The URL can be used to link to this page

FLD2007-03010FLD2007-03010 808 EWING AVE OPTI DEVELOPMENT Clearwater 0 Planning Department 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, Florida 33756 Telephone: 727 - 562 -4567 Fax: 727 - 562 -4865 ❑ SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION ❑ SUBMIT 14 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION -Plans and application are required to be collated, stapled, and folded into sets ❑ SUBMIT APPLICATION FEE $ CASE #: ):1,122-007- 0 3 D( D RECEIVED BY (§tall initials): DATE RECEIVED: * NOTE: 15 TOTAL SETS OF INFORMATION REQUIRED (APPLICATIONS PLUS SITE PLAN SETS) FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION (Revised 03/28/2006) PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT— A. APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4- 202.A) APPLICANT NAME: 0 / 2 /), i S{') MAILING ADDRESS: c;:26(c) PHONE NUMBER: 7a % FAX NUMBER: 7. 7- _ PROPERTY OWNER(S): �� j r be ve /(n /;2 rne n /-, -rh C.- List ALL owners on the deed AGENT NAME: — MAILING ADDRESS: � J7.;L C� �T ✓�e �� PHONE NUMBER: .� 7 —J a -• l G-rC/ FAX NUMBER: 7 �pZ a- // Q`� L! CELL NUMBER: 7 - 77a - 3 cZ-7 U E -MAIL ADDRESS: B. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4- 202.A) PROJECT NAME: CYO,?-90q ��,�/� (�LOi 14Ve , PROJECT VALUATION: $ STREET ADDRESS ��'� �Q(� r`-% �'��/i`p �]ZJC' C�E�Gt�G(iCi �2� PARCEL NUMBER(S): 15- O O 3 C) PARCEL SIZE (acres): ;,2, (� /�� PA CEL SIZE (square feet): /// LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Moon* 01-a /� � e � � � ��l f'S I L A- L,O i PROPOSED USE(S):� le DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST- Specifically identify the request (include number of units or square footage of non - residential use and all requested code deviations; e.g. reduction in required number of parking spaces, specific use, etc.) 00 �� /i sec, ck-W-6 che-cl , 0 /S S: \Planning Department\Application Forms\development review\2006 Forms \Flexible Development (FLD) 2006.doc Page 1 of 7 ORIGINAL U • DOES THIS APPLICATION INVOLVE THE TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS (TDR), A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, OR A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED (CERTIFIED) SITE PLAN? YES _ NO _ (if yes, attach a copy of the applicable documents) C. PROOF OF OWNERSHIP: (Code Section 4- 202.A.5) SUBMIT A COPY OF THE TITLE INSURANCE POLICY, DEED TO THE PROPERTY OR SIGN AFFIDAVIT ATTESTING OWNERSHIP (see page 7) D. WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 3- 913.A) C/ Provide complete responses to the six (6) GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA — Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail: 1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. 2. The propos development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the val thereof. 3. The proposed development will t adversely affect the health or safety or persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use. 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize ffic congestion. 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, ac stic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts, on adjacent properties. RECERE D A PLANNING DEPARTMENT vvr►t CK SAPlanning Department\Application FormsWevelopment reviewt2006 FormsTlexible Development (FLD) 2006.doc Page 2 of 7 0 WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Flexibility Criteria) ;�/ Provide complete responses to the applicable flexibility criteria for the specific Use as listed in each Zoning District to which the waiver is requested (use separate sheets as necessary) — Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail: V e- i E. STORMWATER PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteria Manual and 4- 202.A.21) ❑ A STORMWATER NARRATIVE MUST BE SUBMITTED WITH ALL APPLICATIONS. All applications that involve addition or modification of impervious surface, including buildings, must include a stormwater plan that demonstrates compliance with the City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteria manual. A reduction in impervious surface area does not qualify as an exemption to this requirement. ❑ If a plan is not required, the narrative shall provide an explanation as to why the site is exempt. ❑ At a minimum, the STORMWATER PLAN shall include the following, ❑ Existing topography extending 50 feet beyond all property lines; ❑ Proposed grading including finished floor elevations of all structures; ❑ All adjacent streets and municipal storm systems; ❑ Proposed stormwater detention /retention area including top of bank, toe of slope and outlet control structure; ❑ A narrative describing the proposed stormwater control plan including all calculations and data necessary to demonstrate compliance with the City manual. ❑ Proposed stormwater detention /retention area including top of bank, toe of slope and outlet control structure; ❑ Signature and seal of Florida Registered Professional Engineer on all plans and calculations. ❑ COPY OF PERMIT INQUIRY LETTER OR SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT (SWFWMD) PERMIT SUBMITTAL (SWFWMD approval is required prior to issuance of City Building Permit), if applicable ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF STORMWATER PLAN REQUIREMENTS (Applicant must initial one of the following): Stormwater plan as noted above is included Stormwater plan is not required and explanation narrative is attached. At a minimum, a grading plan and finished floor R/57 !� elevations shall be provided. CAUTION — IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A STORMWATER PLAN AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 562 -4750. F. SUPPLEMENTAL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 4- 202.A) SIGNED AND SEALED SURVEY (including legal description of property) — One original and 14 copies; ❑ TREE SURVEY (including existing trees on site and within 25' of the adjacent site, by species, size (DBH 4" or greater), and location, including drip lines and indicating trees to be removed) — please design around the existing trees; ❑ TREE INVENTORY; prepared by a "certified arborist ", of all trees 8" DBH or greater, reflecting size, canopy (drip lines) and condition of such trees;. LOCATION MAP OF THE PROPERTY; ❑ PARKING DEMAND STUDY in conjunction with a request to make deviations to the parking standards (ie. Reduce number of spaces). Prior to the submittal of this application, the methodology of such study shall be approved by the Community Development Coordinator and shall be in accordance with accepted traffic engineering principles. The findings of the study will be used in determining whether or not deviations to the parking standards are approved; ❑ GRADING PLAN, as applicable; ❑ PRELIMINARY PLAT, as required (Note: Building permits will not be issued until evidence of recording a final plat is provided); ORIGINAL- ❑ COPY OF RECORDED PLAT, as applicable; RECEIVED SAPlanning Department\Application Forms \development review\2006 Forms \Flexible Development (FLD) 2006.doc D....e 2 ..F'7 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER 00 G. SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4- 202.A) Ll SITE PLAN with the following information (not to exceed 24" x 36 "): Index sheet referencing individual sheets included in package; North arrow; u P1 A Engineering bar scale (minimum scale one inch equals 50 feet), and date prepared; All dimensions; Footprint and size of all EXISTING buildings and structures; _ Footprint and size of all PROPOSED buildings and structures; All required setbacks; ` All existing and proposed points of access; All required sight triangles; Identification of environmentally unique areas, such as watercourses, wetlands, tree masses, and specimen trees, including _ description and location of understory, ground cover vegetation and wildlife habitats, etc; Location of all public and private easements; Location of all street rights -of -way within and adjacent to the site; Location of existing public and private utilities, including fire hydrants, storm and sanitary sewer lines, manholes and lift stations, gas and water lines; All parking spaces,. driveways, loading areas and vehicular use areas; Depiction by shading or crosshatching of all required parking lot interior landscaped areas; Location of all solid waste containers, recycling or trash handling areas and outside mechanical equipment and all required screening _ (per Section 3- 201(D)(i) and Index #701 }; Location of all landscape material; Location of all onsite and offsite storm -water management facilities; _ Location of all outdoor lighting fixtures; and Location of all existing and proposed sidewalks. SITE DATA TABLE for existing, required, and proposed development, in written /tabular form: EXISTING REQUIRED PROPOSED _ . Land area in square feet and acres; Number of EXISTING dwelling units; _ Number of PROPOSED dwelling units; _ Gross floor area devoted to each use; Parking spaces: total number, presented in tabular form with the _ number of required spaces; Total paved area, including all paved parking spaces & driveways, _ expressed in square feet & percentage of the paved vehicular area; Official records book and page numbers of all existing utility easement; Building and structure heights; . Impermeable surface ratio (I.S.R.); and Floor area ratio (F.A.R.) for all nonresidential uses. REDUCED COLOR SITE PLAN to scale (8'/Y X 11); FOR DEVELOPMENTS OVER ONE ACRE, provide the following additional information on site plan: One -foot contours or spot elevations on site; _ Offsite elevations if required to evaluate the proposed stormwater management for the parcel; — All open space areas; Location of all earth or water retaining walls and earth berms; Lot lines and building lines (dimensioned); Streets and drives (dimensioned); Building and structural setbacks (dimensioned); _ Structural overhangs; SAPlanning Department\Application Forms \development review\2006 Forms\Flexible Development (FLD) 2006.doc Page 4 of 7 ORIGINAL RECFE WE D APR 02 2007 PLANNING IDEPARTNIEN CITY OF CLEARWATER H. LANDSCAPING PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4- 1102.A) ❑ LANDSCAPE PLAN with the following information (not to exceed 24" x 36 "): All existing and proposed structures; Names of abutting streets; Drainage and retention areas including swales, side slopes and bottom elevations; Delineation and dimensions of all required perimeter landscape buffers; Sight visibility triangles; Delineation and dimensions of all parking areas including landscaping islands and curbing; Existing trees on -site and immediately adjacent to the site, by species, size and locations, including driplines (as indicated on required tree survey); Location, size, and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, indicated by a key relating to the plant _ schedule; Plant schedule with a key (symbol or label) indicating the size, description, specifications, quantities, and spacing requirements of all _ existing and proposed landscape materials, including botanical and common names; Typical planting details for trees, palms, shrubs and ground cover plants including instructions, soil mixes, backfilling, mulching and _ protective measures; Interior landscaping areas hatched and /or shaded and labeled and interior landscape coverage, expressing in both square feet and percentage covered; _ Conditions of a previous development approval (e.g. conditions imposed by the Community Development Board); Irrigation notes. ❑ REDUCED COLOR LANDSCAPE PLAN to scale (8 %X 11); ❑ COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM application, as applicable. Landscape associated with the Comprehensive Landscape Program shall exceed minimum Code requirements to offset the areas where minimum Code will not be met. I. BUILDING ELEVATION PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4- 202.A.23) ❑ BUILDING ELEVATION DRAWINGS — with the following information; _ All sides of all buildings; Dimensioned; _ Colors (provide one full sized set of colored elevations); Materials; Sight visibility triangles; ❑ REDUCED BUILDING ELEVATIONS — same as above to scale on 8'/2 X 11. J. SIGNAGE: (Division 19. SIGNS / Section 3 -1806) ❑ All EXISTING freestanding and attached signs; Provide photographs and dimensions (area, height, etc.), indicate whether they will be removed or to remain. ❑ All PROPOSED freestanding and attached signs; Provide details including location, size, height, colors, materials and drawing; freestanding signs shall include the street address (numerals) ❑ Comprehensive Sign Program application, as applicable (separate application and fee required). ❑ Reduced signage proposal (8 '/2 X 11) (color), if submitting Comprehensive Sign Program application. APR 0 2 2007 SAPlanning Departmenl\Application Forms \development review\2006 Forms\Flexible Development (FLD) 2006.doc PLANNING DEPARTMENT Page 5 of 7 CITY OF CLEARWATER K. TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY: (Section 4- 202.A.13 and 4- 801.C) O Include if required by the Traffic Operations Manager or his /her designee or if the proposed development: • Will degrade the acceptable level of service for any roadway as adopted in the Comprehensive Plan. ■ Will generate 100 or more new vehicle directional trips per hour and /or 1000 or more new vehicle trips per day. • Will affect a nearby roadway segment and /or intersection with five (5) reportable accidents within the prior twelve (12) month period or that is on the City's annual list of most hazardous intersections. Trip generation shall be based on the most recent edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineer's (ITE) Trip General Manual. The Traffic Impact Study must be prepared in accordance with a "Scoping Meeting" held with the Traffic Operations Manager and the Planning Department's Development Review Manager or their designee (727 - 562 -4750) Refer to Section 4 -801 C of the Community Development Code for exceptions to this requirement. Acknowledgement of traffic impact study requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following): Traffic Impact Study is included. The study must include a summary table of pre- and post - development levels of service for all roadway legs and each turning movement at all intersections identified in the Scoping.Meeting. Traffic Impact Study is not required. CAUTION — IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 562- 4750. L. FIRE FLOW CALCULATIONS/ WATER STUDY: Provide Fire Flow Calculations. Water Study by a FIRE PROTECTION ENGINEER to assure an adequate water supply is available and to determine if any upgrades are required by the developer due to the impact of this project. The water supply must be able to support the needs of any required fire sprinkler, standpipe and/or fire pump. If a fire pump is required the water supply must be able to supply 150% of its rated capacity. Compliance with the 2004 Florida Fire Prevention Code to include NFPA 13, MFPA 14, NFPA 20, NFPA 291, and MFPA 1142 (Annex H) is required. �R�GI(VAl. Acknowledgement of fire flow calculations/water study requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following): IRIGI d Fire Flow Calculations/Water Study is included. Fire Flow Calculations/Water Study is not required. APR 0 2 2007 CAUTION —IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR AFIRE FLOW PLANNING CALCULATIONS/ WATER STUDY AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST PLANNING , (717y f RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Fire Prevention Department at (727) 562 -4334. M. SIGNATURE: I, the undersigned, acknowledge that all representations made in this application are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge and authorize City representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application. A I Signature of prq6erty owner or representative /� o SAPlanning DepartmentWpplication STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINE LAS S ;qrn to a d subscribed before me this day of �p A.D. 20 0 to me and/or by who is personally known has produc as identiflpation.. _ If,--\ A commission 11 9 Commission # DDR63554 Expires February 3, 2011 Bated Troy Fain • Insumrft. Inc. WD- 395.7019 Comiriiss +ort # D0603554 o & ,Vires February 3, 2011 Bonded -ro, nsurance, me PoJ -'ng m+y N. AFFIDAVIT TO AUTHORIZE AGENT: Provide names of all property owners on deed — PRINT full names: 2., That (I am /we are) the owner(s) and record title holder(s) of the following described property (address or general location): 0Oe 3. That this property constitutes the property for which a request for a: (describe request) V 4. That the undersigned (has /have) appointed and (does /do) appoint: as (his /their) agent(s) to execute any petitions or other documents necessary to affect such petition; 5. That this affidavit has been executed to induce the City of Clearwater, Florida to consider and act on the above described property; 6. That site visits to the property are necessary by City representatives in order to process this application and the owner authorizes City representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application; 7. That (Uwe), the undersigned authority, hereby certify that the foregoing is true and correct. r Pr pe Owner Property Owner � -.. Property Owner Property Owner STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS Before me the undersigned, an officer duly commissioned by the laws of the SSttatej of Florida, on this 0942' I personally appeared Deposes and says that he /she fully understands the contents of the affidavit that he /she signed. o�AR" °��, Mistelle M. Whigham * Commission # DD6 33554 `"4 o` Expires February 3, 2011 OF p1.� t "'d Troy Fein • Insure M. Mc. 8003857019 Notary Seal/Stamp S day of who having been first duly sworn C�� Notary Public ature My Commission Expires: SAPlanning DepartmenMpplication Forms \development revievA2006 FormsTlexible Development (FLD) 2006.doc Page 7 of 7 ORIGINAL. RECEIVED APR 0 2 2007 PLANNING DEPARMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER Opti Development, Inc. 200 Beach Drive NE #12 St. Petersburg, Fl 33701 727 - 892 -9999 June 8, 2007 Mr. Robert G. Tefft City of Clearwater Planning Department P. O. Box 4748 Clearwater, Fl 33758 -4748 RE: FLD2007- 03010- 808 804 Ewing Avenue Residential Infill Redevelopment Application Dear Mr. Tefft: This responds and supplements the Development Review Comments of May 4, 2007. Opti now submits the proposal as a Residential Infill Redevelopment Project pursuant to Community Development Code Section 2 -204 E, for the CDB meeting of July 17; 2007. 1. The request for a minor lot line adjustment is withdrawn. 2. — 4. See new survey. 5. The average volume to lot size ratio of all existing structures within 500 feet of the proposed lot is .25. See Exhibit A. Community Development Code Section 2 -204 E Criteria: Opti seeks to create a 4;467 square foot lot suitable for construction of a single - family detached dwelling of no more than 1,150 square feet. The existing 11,475 square foot parcel contains a detached single family structure. A two story, two unit frame structure was previously located on the northwest corner of the parcel. Flexibility is requested regarding lot size to accommodate a 5 foot setback on the proposed lot south line for the existing single family structure. The proposed single family use is permitted in the City of Clearwater. Criteria 1 -6. Not applicable as no structure is presently proposed ORIGINAL. RECEIVED JUN 12 2007 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER Criteria 7. Flexibility as to lot size is ,justified by benefits to the community character in the immediate vicinity of the parcel and for the City of Clearwater as a whole. The creation of a new lot will benefit the community character by providing a consistent streetscape facing Ewing Ave. in keeping with the opposing southeast corner, which currently contains four similarly sized lots under 5,000 square feet. These are 903 Ewing Ave, 1001, 1003 and 1003 A Jasmine Way sized at 3,250;3,599; 2800; and 3950 square feet respectfully. Exhibit B. Moreover, the resulting lot width of 50.63 feet will be consistent with many (16 under 55') lot widths on Jasmine Way and Ewing Ave. further advancing a consistent streetscape in the immediate vicinity of the parcel. Exhibit C. Additionally, the proposed lot size is consistent with the character of lots in the community as eight other lots within 500 feet of the proposed lot are smaller than 5,000 square feet. Exhibit D. The creation of a new lot will benefit the City of Clearwater as a whole as it promotes housing near mass transit routes, in a pedestrian friendly location, thereby encouraging mass transit use over automobiles. The size of the lot is suitable for workforce or first time buyer housing, which benefits the community by promoting homeownership at entry level price points. Finally, the creation of a new. lot will add value to the tax rolls, encourage construction of new housing, which will be maintained and taxed for the City of Clearwater's benefit. Please see supporting documents: Exhibits A -D, Survey and Copy of Orginial Submission attached. Respectfully submitted, i Mary S. SAllivan Opti Development, Inc. ORIGINAL RECEIVED JUN 12 2007 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER 808 804 EWING AVE. CLEARWATER SUPPLEMENTAL SUBMISSION RESIDENTIAL INFILL PROJECT ORIGINAL. RECEIVED JUN 12 2007 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER EXHIBIT A ORIGINAL, RECEIVED JUN 12 2007 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER I N` 14 i A C, —N I y ORLVE i 52 z '?FCSIVF.D Pinellas County Property Appraiser JUN 12 2007 PLANNING DEPARTMENT Parcel Information CITY OF CLEARWATER ro Z ZC-,2t-4 (P7 f5 Lo 12C ;2 sz 73- E 3oj , 77, u-, kM I y ORLVE i 52 z '?FCSIVF.D Pinellas County Property Appraiser JUN 12 2007 PLANNING DEPARTMENT Parcel Information CITY OF CLEARWATER ro Z ZC-,2t-4 (P7 f5 Average volumn to lot size ratio of all existing structures within 500 feet of the proposed lot GROSS SF SUBJECT BLOCK 911 Druid Rd 2962 909 Druid Rd 2386 905 Druid Rd 1970 903 Druid Rd 1448 801 Prospect 1348 803 Prospect 1082 805 Prospect 1116 807 Prospect 1666 904 Jasmine 963 906 Jasmine 1518 908 Jasmine 1333 912 Jasmine 1716, 2220 1010 Magr olia Dr EAST OF SUBJECT BLOCK 1005 Druid Rd 1103 1007 Druid Rd 1532 1009 Druid Rd 1150 800 MLK 1,668 804 MLK 1,280 816 MLK 1177 1010 Jasmine 1295 1008 Jasmine 2088 1006 Jasmine 1190 1004 Jasmine 1306 1002 Jasmine 1138 1000 Jasmine 1360 SOUTH EAST OF SUBJECT BLOCK 1001 Jasmine 1210 1003 Jasmine 1071 1003 A Jasmine 1402 1005 Jasmine 1278 1007 Jasmine 1446 1011 Jasmine 3162 1015 Jasmine 1102 1017 Jasmine 972 902 MLK 1762 904 MLK 1324 906 MLK 1476 1014 Magnolia Dr 2220 1010 Magr olia Dr 2955 1008 Magnolia Dr 1565 1006 Magr olia Dr 1340 1004 Magnolia Dr 948 1002 Magnolia Dr 1284 71000, 100a Magnolia 2005 LOT AREA <5000 SF SF /LOT AREA AVERAGE 11,205 0.26 0.25 8,100 0.29 6,750 0.29 6,750 0.21 6,000 0.22 5,000 0.21 5,000 0.22 5,000 0.33 6:000 0.16 6,750 0.22 6,750 0.19 n�7,4257� 11 0.23 13,770 .0.08 6,885 0.22 8,100 0.14 8,400 0.19 6,000 -0.21 6,000 10.19 12,000 '0.1 6,750 0.3 6.885 0.17 6,885 0.18 6,885 ` 0.16 6,885 0.19 ' ,tyl.? I {j- = 0.1115 3,599 XXXXXXX: 0.34 2,800 XXXXXXX 0.38 3,950 XXXXXXX 0.35 6,750 0.18 6,750 0.21 8,250 0.38 2,700 XXXXXXX; 0.4 3,900 XXXXXXX 0.24 6.000 0.29 5,000 0.26 5,000 0.29 5,000 , 0.44 10,000 0.29 6,750 0.23 6,750 0.19, 6,750 0.14 6,750 0.19 3,350 XXXXXXX 0.59 4 ORIGINAL RECEIVED JUN 12 2007 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY QE CLEARWATER 903 Ewing Ave 1488 3,250 XXXXXXX: 0.45 SOUTH OF SUBJECT BLOCK 905 Jasmine 1215 6,420 0.18 907 Jasmine 1864 8,100 0.23 909 Jasmine 2699 8,100 -0.33 913 Jasmine 1423 5,400 0.26 915 Jasmine 2334 8.505 0.27 916 Magnolia Dr 2586 8,694 0.29 912 Magnolia Dr 940 5,520 0.17 910 Magnolia Dr 1620 72590 0.21 908 Magnolia Dr 1596 81970 ' 0.17 904 Magnolia Dr 1144 5,550 0.2 905 Prospect Ave 3491 6,600 0.52 ivy v,27-2�2�1 2nd BLOC[ K SOUTH EAST AND SOUTH OF SUBJECT BLOCK 1007 Magnolia Dr 1358 10,125 0.13 1005 Magnolia Dr 1562 12,025 0.12 917 Magnolia Dr 2559 7,500 0.34 911 Magnolia Dr 1820 5,670 0.32 908 Magnolia Dr 1596 8,970 0.17 1001 Prospect Ave 20210 29,700 0.68 SOUTHWEST OF SUBJECT BLOCK 904 Prospect Ave 9816 110,970 0.38 7311 8860 ZG 10604 0.'� 3 0. 4642 1181 812 Magnolia Dr 948 6072 0.15 WEST OF SUBJECT BLOCK 806 Prospect Ave 951 5,000 0.19 802 Prospect Ave 1208 5,000 0.24 / OA-7-z- 800 Prospect Ave 1288 6,000 0.21 811 Druid Rd 1600 7,965 0.2 808 Druid Rd 1243 9,774 0.52 612 830 1177 1248 NORTH WEST OF SUBJECT BLOCK 812 Druid Rd 1381 4,428 XXXXXXX: 0.31 816 Druid Rd 1776 4,428 XXXXXXX: 0.4 708 Prospect Ave. 1801 5,400 0.33 ORIGINAL RECEIVED NORTH OF SUBJECT BLOCK 711 Prosp( ect Ave 1008 11,800 0.24 JUN 12 2007 1364 520 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER 707 Prospect Ave 2904 10,350 10.28 705 Prospect Ave 1498 8,700 0.17f 904 Druid Rd 1324 5,000 0.26 906 Druid Rd 1476 5,000 • 0.29 908 Druid Rd 908 9,000 0.1 910 Druid Rd 1098 9,000 0.2 770 912 Druid Rd 1392 9,000 '0.3 1344 914 Druid Rd 976 8,950 r 0.24 1226 1000 Druid Rd 2488 8,950 ' 0.38 988 1002 Druid Rd 1284 8,950 0.14 1004 Druid Rd 948 8,771 0.1 1006 Druid Rd 1340 6,750 0.19 1010 Druid Rd 1599 10.500 0.28 648 708 1012 Druid Rd 5289 22,428 0.23 909 Pine St 3310 8,750 , 0.38 911 Pine St 1494 5750 0.26 913 Pine St 2038 8,750 10.23 915 Pine St 2214 8,750 0.25 1001 Pine St 2118 17,500 0.12 1005 Pine St 1452 8,575 0.17 1009 Pine St 1236 17,150 0.07 907 Pine St. 2558 8,750 0.29 23.49 RIB. I ,z 2�- 2 �U�fo ORIGINAL RECEIVED JUN 12 2007 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER EXHIBIT D JIJIV 1001 ® INS' J)Ep ARiylt r p�, t t S g -°G Oki g lilt Al- 47, F ��. :� to �� bl..�°s�"' ��k; F�. •. t, .' ` "viol k AL .IF. �^ � ' yq �4 .'4.16 •_ -�• ♦. .S g �` � s , is �y'• "�, �,�' it 4k i. t �.n �F �� c �� Y i ,p •� Ate +ra �� § - ,y�. ` e�x •�e f 4� �, i� sit rte^ AN sIF, 0 0 ORIGINAL RECENED JUN 12 2001 PI CIV 0 GC EARWATE R CI OF '{ ,Y3ii F x .a ��M� ° +Y g +,�F .. �U' r � "9 � •ys: �'� �� , � (" 4. •s ��r �'� �r �L+ r e 7 '. :� � ", 'k a i . tip, ' y ,1 Q �,r �. �y•� � ,.�. p " ,ii ' "''4., " ,� p ;d`: ° � � �4r.. , � � � �t"�"� �'iL � 1� , a�� . �P z'A ff. YAt r'�Fl.r • fi � . A �, • � •#t �. �� ''4�,`L•�+t ",�'�. ,4,. ,lwr.. �+y� ,''S. ra�' 3f ' ;4�:1; "a`'r� .✓`... I' �:, '�. "�. �F ie. ,.*'i � �- ",�� ,. ® aR �'�NB. ��n�• g3 V*�A�� p y<<,H�,gt �� "r. � 4'3 t�+ r. £ ,� °' " �` ✓• RLq "� ;Yr,.i „� .,, lob 'i a •' R, ` 4 "q• w• i,yyx. " ,T' ` maw °±. 9 r w., 4�r 4�x+s :";„ ; ,s:, .. r Y. ,,.e,�Y ��►��. TI�}�^�'»s w.F � � C r 9�d � r r „ "e y ` �¢ 'Y� c ,•3- .y3 q�{ A' "�. �,* r �1� ,� 7 � r:� +arc !!• wy � �y x x a t• Y , r �) F ,H R< i e ,R\rll ,or ti2�� t ��N GQ�ti��pSE Q�N OF G� go FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION Owner: Opti Development, Inc. Location: 808,806,804 Ewing Ave. B. Proposed Development Information and Description of Request: Owner, Opti Development, Inc. seeks to create 2 lots (808 Ewing with existing block structure, and a second vacant build able lot 804 Ewing) from a single 11,475 square foot corner parcel located at 808, 806, and 804 Ewing Ave. And to address a side fence that is constructed across the abutting property line by granting a small portion of the lot to the abutter. The parcel is in a Low Medium Density Residential District ( "LMDR" ). The parcel currently contains three units consisting of a single family block structure at 808 Ewing and a two unit two story frame structure at 804 Ewing. This request for flexible development stems from a fire creating an unsafe condition in the two unit wood frame structure located at 804 Ewing. Demolition, Tree Removal and Grubbing Permits have issued for the demolition of the two story frame structure and removal of a large oak tree in the center of 804 Ewing. Opti seeks to: 1. Divide the existing parcel into two parcels consisting of a.) 804 Ewing: a northerly located vacant build able parcel of approximately 4,150 square feet and b.) 808 Ewing: a southerly parcel of approximately 7,055 square feet containing the existing single family block home. 2. Further, Opti seeks to address a misplaced side fence which currently crosses the property line by granting the East 5 feet of Lot 30 Block A to the abutting property owner of Lot 30 in order to reestablish the original platted Lot 30 and thereby allow the existing abutter's fence to be established wholly on Lot 30 rather than crossing the property line onto Lot 31 as currently constructed. D. Written Submittal Requirements: 1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. The proposed southerly parcel contains a single family dwelling presently in scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of the adjacent single family homes on Jasmine Way. ORIGINAL RELIVE[? APR 0 2 2007 PLANNING DEPARTIAENT CITY OF CLEARWATER Page 2 The proposed vacant lot will be suitable for a newly constructed detached dwelling meeting the guidelines articulated in Section 2 -204. Flexible development criteria Table 2 -204 "LMDR" District Flexible Development. Specifically the new lot size ranges between 3,000- 5,000 sq. ft. The lot width exceeds 50'. The area allows for minimum front, side, and rear setbacks of 15 -25, 2 -5, 5 -15 feet, respectfully, to be observed. Further, the Maximum height limitation of 30' is consistent with abutting properties on Ewing and Jasime Way. The proposed lot also permits room for a minimum of Off — Street Parking of 2 /unit. 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof because the adjacent land and buildings are developed on Ewing and Jasmine Way. The adjacent land on Druid Rd. contains a multi family structure whose use is established and whose value is not impaired by the construction of a detached dwelling with the articulated setbacks at 804 Ewing. 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety or persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use because there will be no health or safety changes stemming from a similar detached single family dwelling. 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion because it will reduce-the number of dwelling units from 3 to two at this location. A reduction in living units will reduce and minimize traffic congestion associated with the reduction of one unit at this location. 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the proposed two parcels because it seeks to maintain detached single family dwelling use consistent with the character of the existing single family dwelling units on Jasmine Way and Ewing Ave. The multiple units on Druid abutting the parcel relate and face away from Jasmine and Ewing towards Druid. The proposed use for a single family detached residential use is in keeping with the community character of residential use of all abutting parcels. 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic, olfactory and hours of operation impacts on adjacent properties because the proposed use is consistent with detached single story, single family visual effect. Noise, smell, and hours of use are the same as the residential detached dwellings structures surrounding and abutting the proposed parcels on Jasmine and Ewing Ave. The multi - family adjacent on Druid Ave. is a residential structure conforming with acoustic, olfactory and hours of operation.as the ORIG IN proposed residential dwelling use. ,;� ORIRI INAL REC OR 02 2007 PLA1%4ING DEPARDAENT CITY OF CLEARWATER .* 00 Page 3 Flexible Development Proposal 808, 806, 804 Ewing Ave. The Flexibility Criteria for B. Detached Dwellings: 1. By creating a lot size of less than 5,000 square feet is necessary for the redevelopment of 804 Ewing Ave, because it provides a 5 ` side line set back for the existing block structure at 808 Ewing without increasing the density of the location. 2. Access is .provided to the North lot by frontage on Ewing Ave. Access to the South lot is provided by frontage on Ewing Ave. and Jasmine Way. 3. No structure is proposed to be developed on the North lot now; however it is agreed that the volume to lot size ratio of any structure to be developed on the lot is no more than ten percent greater than the average volume to lot size ratio of all existing structures within 500 feet of the lot. 4, 5, 6. The proposal does not request reductions in front, rear, or side setbacks. E. Stormwater Plan Submittal Applicant acknowledges that stormwater plan is not required because the application does not involve the addition or modification of impervious surfaces. F. Signed and sealed survey and location map of property provided. K. Traffic Impact Study Applicant acknowledges that no traffic impact study is required as no increase in density or traffic is proposed. Applicant seeks to reduce traffic impact because density will be reduced by one dwelling unit. L. Fire Flow Calculations Applicant acknowledges that no fire flow calculations /water study is required as the applicant seeks to reduce density by one dwelling unit. This will result in reduction in fire flow /water for the parcel. ORIGINAL. REIVED APR 0 2 2007 PLANNING DEPAil MENT CITY OF CLEARWATER ALTA OWNER'S POLICY - 10 -17 -92 WITH FLORIDA MODIFICATIONS "If you want information about coverage or need assistance to resolve complaints, please call 1- 800 - 729 -1902. If you make a claim under your policy, you must famish written notice in accordance with Section 3 of the Conditions and Stipulations." POLICY OF TITLE INSURANCE ISSUED BY STEWART TITLE GUARANTY COMPANY SUBJECT TO THE EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE, THE EXCEPTIONS FROM COVERAGE CONTAINED IN SCHEDULE B AND THE CONDITIONS AND STIPULATIONS, STEWART TITLE GUARANTY COMPANY, a Texas corporation, herein called the Company, insures, as of Date of Policy shown in Schedule A, against loss or damage, not exceeding the Amount of Insurance stated in Schedule A, sustained or incurred by the insured by reason of: 1. Title to the estate or interest described in Schedule A being vested other than as stated therein; 2. Any defect in or lien or encumbrance on the title; 3. Unmarketability of the title; 4. Lack of a right of access to and from the land. The Company will also pay the costs, attorneys' fees and expenses incurred in defense of the title, as insured, but only to the extent provided in the Conditions and Stipulations. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Stewart Title Guaranty Company has caused this policy to be signed and sealed by its duly authorized officers as of the Date of Policy shown in Schedule A. Title First, Inc. " Company 53381st Avenue North St. Petersburg, Florida 33710 City, State EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE The following matters are expressly excluded from the coverage of this policy and the Company will not pay loss or damage, costs, attorneys' fees or expenses which arise by reason of 1. (a) Any law, ordinance or governmental regulation (including but not limited to building and zoning laws, ordinances, or regulations) restricting, regulating, prohibiting or relating to (i) the occupancy, use, or enjoyment of the land; (ii) the character, dimensions or location of any improvement now or hereafter erected on the land; (iii) a separation in ownership or a change in the dimensions or area of the land or any parcel of which the land is or was a part; or (iv) environmental protection, or the effect of any violation of these laws, ordinances or governmental regulations, except to the extent that a notice of the enforcement thereof or a notice of a defect, lien or encumbrance resulting from a violation or alleged violation affecting the land has been recorded in the public records at Date of Policy. (b) Any governmental police power not excluded by (a) above, except to the extent that a notice of the exercise thereof or a notice of a defect, lien or encumbrance resulting from a violation or alleged violation affecting the land has been recorded in the public records at Date of Policy. 2. Rights of eminent domain unless notice of the exercise thereof has been recorded in the public records at Date of Policy, but not excluding from coverage any taking which has occurred prior to Date of Policy which would be binding on the rights of a purchaser for value without knowledge. 3. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters: (a) created, suffered, assumed or agreed to by the insured claimant; (b) not known to the Company, not recorded in the public records at Date of Policy, but known to the insured claimant and not disclosed in writing to the Company by the insured claimant prior to the date the insured claimant became an insured under this policy; (c) resulting in no loss or damage to the insured claimant; (d) attaching or created subsequent to Date of Policy; or (e) resulting in loss or damage which would not have been sustained if the insured claimant had paid value for the estate or interest insured by this policy. 4. Any claim, which arises out of the transaction vesting in the Insured the estate or interest insured by this policy, by reason of the operation of federal bankruptcy, state insolvency, or similar creditors' rights laws; that is based on: (a) the transaction creating the estate or interest insured by this policy being deemed a fraudulent conveyance or fraudulent transfer; or (b) the transaction creating the estate or interest insured by this policy being deemed a preferential transfer except where the preferential transfer results from the failure: (i) to timely record the instrument of transfer; or (ii) of such recordation to impart notice to a purchaser for, value or a judgment or lien creditor. POLICY SERIAL NO. 0- 2201- 322616 Order No.: 501823 SCHEDULE A j Date of Policy: August 29, 2006 at 11:02 AM Amount of Insurance: $170,000.00 1. Name of Insured: Opti Development, Inc., a Florida Corporatio n 2. The estate or interest in the land which is covered by this Policy is: Fee Simple 3. Title to the estate or interest in the land is vested in the insured. 4. The land referred to in this policy is described as follows: Policy No.: 0- 2201 - 322616 The East Five feet of Lot 30, and ALL of Lots 31, 32, 33, and 34, in Block A, MOUNT ORANGE REVISED PLAT, according to the plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 6, Page 46, Pinellas County, Florida For Company Reference Purposes Only According to the insured representation or vesting instrument(s), the street address of the property is: Street Name: 808 Ewing Ave. City/State /Zip: Clearwater, Florida 33756 -4006 County: Pinellas Pin/Tax #: 15/29/15/59292/001 /0320 The Company does not represent or insure the above address is accurate. Page 1 of 2 Reg. D 0012 Rev. 01 -05 " This Policy is not valid unless Schedule A and Schedule B are included." ORIGINAL REDUED APR 0 2 2007 Pf.M14ING DEFAR -i MENT CI'!Y OF CLEARWATER STEWART TITLE GUARANTY COMPANY Order No.: 501823 SCHEDULE B Policy No.: 0- 2201 - 322616 This policy does not insure against loss or damage (and the Company will not pay costs, attorneys' fees or expenses) i which arise by reason of- 1 . Rights or claims of parties in possession not shown by the public records. 2. Easements, or claims of easements, not shown by the public records. 3. Encroachments, overlaps, boundary line disputes, or other matters which would be disclosed by an accurate survey and inspection of the premises. 4. Any lien, or right to a lien, for services, labor, or material heretofore or hereafter furnished, imposed by law and not shown by the public records. 5. Any adverse ownership claim by the State of Florida by right of sovereignty to any portion of the lands insured hereunder, including submerged, filled, and artificially exposed lands and lands accreted to such lands. 6. Taxes for the year 2006 and subsequent years, which are not yet due and payable. Exceptions numbered 1 and 4 are hereby deleted from the Owner's Policy. Page 2 of 2 Reg. D 0012 Rev. 01 -05 "This Policy is not valid unless Schedule A and Schedule Bare included" ORIGINAL RE �VFD APR 0 2 2001 PLANNING DEPAR -IMEN CITY OF CLEARWATER STEWART TITLE GUARANTY COMPANY • CONDITIONS AND STIPULATIONS 1. DEFINITION OF TERMS. The following terms when used in this policy mean: (a) "insured ": the insured named in Schedule A, and, subject to any rights or defenses the Company would have had against the named insured, those who succeed to the interest of the named insured by operation of law as distinguished from purchase including, but not limited to, heirs, distributees, devisees, survivors, personal representatives, next of kin, or corporate or fiduciary successors. (b) "insured claimant ": an insured claiming loss or damage. (c) "knowledge" or "known ": actual knowledge, not constructive knowledge or notice which may be imputed to an insured by reason of the public records as defined in this policy or any other records which impart constructive notice of matters affecting the land. (d) "land ": the land described or referred to in Schedule A, and improvements affixed thereto which by law constitute real property. The term "land" does not include any property beyond the lines of the area described or referred to in Schedule A, nor any right, title, interest, estate or easement in abutting streets, roads, avenues, alleys, lanes, ways or waterways, but nothing herein shall modify or limit the extent to which a right of access to and from the land is insured by this policy. (e) "mortgage ": mortgage, deed of trust, trust deed, or other security instrument. (f) "public records ": records established under state statutes at Date of Policy for the purpose of imparting constructive notice of matters relating to real property to purchasers for value and without knowledge. With respect to Section 1(a) (iv) of the Exclusions From Coverage, "public records" shall also include environmental protection liens filed in the records of the clerk of the United States district court for the district in which the land is located. (g) "unmarketability of the title ": an alleged or apparent matter affecting the title to the land, not excluded or excepted from coverage, which would entitle a purchaser of the estate or interest described in Schedule A to be released from the obligation to purchase by virtue of a contractual condition requiring the delivery of marketable title. 2. CONTINUATION OF INSURANCE AFTER CO NVEYANCE OF TITLE. The coverage of this policy shall continue in force as of Date of Policy in favor of an insured only so long as the insured retains an estate or interest in the land, or holds an indebtedness secured by a purchase money mortgage given by a purchaser from the insured, or only so long as the insured shall have liability by reason of covenants of warranty made by the insured in any transfer or conveyance of the estate or interest. This policy shall not continue in force in favor of any purchaser from the insured of either (i) an estate or interest in the land, or (ii) an indebtedness secured by a purchase money mortgage given to the insured. 3. NOTICE OF CLAIM TO BE GIVEN BY INSURED CLAIMANT. The insured shall notify the Company promptly in writing (i) in case of any litigation as set forth in Section 4(a) below, (ii) in case knowledge shall come to an insured hereunder of any claim of title or interest which is adverse to the title to the estate or interest, as insured, and which might cause loss or damage for which the Company may be liable by virtue of this policy, or (iii) if title to the estate or interest, as insured, is rejected as unmarketable. If prompt notice shall not be given to the Company, then as to the insured all liability of the Company shall terminate with regard to the matter or matters for which prompt notice is required; provided, however, that failure to notify the Company shall in no case prejudice the rights of any insured under this policy unless the Company shall be prejudiced by the failure and then only to the extent of the prejudice. 4. DEFENSE AND PROSECUTION OF ACTIONS; DUTY OF INSURED CLAIMANT TO COOPERATE . (a) Upon written request by the insured and subject to the options contained in Section 6 of these Conditions and Stipulations, the Company, at its own cost and without unreasonable delay, shall provide for the defense of an insured in litigation in which any third party asserts a claim adverse to the title or interest as insured, but only as to those stated causes of action alleging a defect, lien or encumbrance or other matter insured against by this policy. The Company shall have the right to select counsel of its choice (subject to the right of the insured to object for reasonable cause) to represent the insured as to those stated causes of action and shall not be liable for and will not pay the fees of any other counsel. The Company will not pay any fees, costs or expenses incurred by the insured in the defense of those causes of action which allege matters not insured against by this policy. (b) The Company shall have the right, at its own cost, to institute and prosecute any action or proceeding or to do any other act which in its opinion may be necessary or desirable to establish the title to the estate or interest, as insured, or to prevent or reduce loss or damage to the insured. The Company may take any appropriate action under the terms of this policy, whether or not it shall be liable hereunder, and shall not thereby concede liability or waive any provision of this policy. If the Company shall exercise its rights under this paragraph, it shall do so diligently. (c) Whenever the Company shall have brought an action or interposed a defense as required or permitted by the provisions of this policy, the Company may pursue any litigation to final determination by a court of competent jurisdiction and expressly reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to appeal from any adverse judgment or order. (d) In all cases where this policy permits or requires the Company to prosecute or provide for the defense of any action or proceeding, the insured shall secure to the Company the right to so prosecute or provide defense in the action or proceeding, and all appeals therein, and permit the Company to use, at its option, the name of the insured for this purpose. Whenever requested by the Company, the insured, at the Company's expense, shall give the Company all reasonable aid (i) in any action or proceeding, securing evidence, obtaining witnesses, prosecuting or defending the action or proceeding, or effecting settlement, and (ii) in any other lawful act which in the opinion of the Company may be necessary or desirable to establish the title to the estate or interest as insured. If the Company is prejudiced by the failure of the insured to fumish the required cooperation, the Company's obligations to the insured under the policy shall terminate, including any liability or obligation to defend, prosecute, or continue any litigation, with regard to the matter or matters requiring such cooperat ion. (continued) (ALTA Owner's Policy) ORIGINAL. RECEIVED APR 0 2 2007 PLANNING DEPAWIn ENT CITY OF CLEARWAY VP C CONDITIONS AND STIPULATIONS Continued 5. PROOF OF LOSS OR DAMAGE. In addition to and after the notices required under Section 3 of these Conditions and Stipulations have been provided the Company, a proof of loss or damage signed and sworn to by the insured claimant shall be furnished to the Company within 90 days after the insure d claimant shall ascertain the facts giving rise to the loss or damage. The proof of loss or damage shall describe the defect in, or lien or encumbrance on the title, or other matter insured against by this policy which constitutes the basis of loss or damage and shall state, to the extent possible, the basis of calculating the amount of the loss or damage. If the Company is prejudiced by the failure of the insured claimant to provide the required proof of loss or damage, the Company's obligations to the insured under the policy shall terminate, including any liability or obligation to defend, prosecute, or continue any litigation, with regard to the matter or matters requiring such proof of loss or damage. In addition, the insured claimant may reasonably be required to submit to examination under oath by any authorized representative of the Company and shall produce for examination, inspection and copying, at such reasonable times and places as may be designated by any authorized representative of the Company, all records, books, ledgers, checks, correspondence and memoranda, whether bearing a date before or after Date of Policy, which reasonably pertain to the loss or damage. Further, if requested by any authorized representative of the Company, the insured claimant shall grant its permission, in writing, for any authorized representative of the Company to examine, inspect and copy all records, books, ledgers, checks, correspondence and memoranda in the custody or control of a third party, which reasonably pertain to the loss or damage. All information designated as confidential by the insured claimant provided to the Company pursuant to this Section shall not be disclosed to others unless, in the reasonable judgment of the Company, it is necessary in the administration of the claim. Failure of the insured claimant to submit for examination under oath, produce other reasonably requested information or grant permission to secure reasonably necessary information from third parties as required in this paragraph shall terminate any liability of the Company under this policy as to that claim. 6. OPTIONS TO PAY OR OTHERWISE SETTLE CLAIMS; TERMINATION OF LIABILITY . In case of a claim under this policy, the Company shall have the following additional options: (a) To Pay or Tender Payment of the Amount of Insurance. To pay or tender payment of the amount of insurance under this policy together with any costs, attorneys' fees and expenses incurred by the insured claimant, which were authorized by the Company, up to the time of payment or tender of payment and which the company is obligated to pay. Upon the exercise by the Company of this option, all liability and obligations to the insured under this policy, other than to make the payment required, shall terminate, including any liability or obligation to defend, prosecute, or continue any litigation, and the policy shall be surrendered to the Company for cancellation. (b) To Pay or Otherwise Settle With Parties Other than the Insured or With the Insured Claimant. (i) to pay or otherwise settle with other parties for or in the name of an insured claimant any claim insured against under this policy, together with any costs, attorneys' fees and expenses incurred by the insured claimant which were authorized by the Company up to the time of payment and which the Company is obligated to pay; or (ii) to pay or otherwise settle with the insured claimant the loss or damage provided for under this policy, together with any costs, attorneys' fees and expenses incurred by the insured claimant which were authorized by the Company up to the time of payment and which the Company is obligated to pay. Upon the exercise by the Company of either of the options provided for in paragraphs (b)(i) or (ii), the Company's obligations to the insured under this policy for the claimed loss or damage, other than the payments required to be made, shall terminate, including any liability or obligation to defend, prosecute or continue any litigation. 7. DETERMINATION, EXTENT OF LIABILITY. This policy is a contract of indemnity against actual monetary loss or damage sustained or incurred by the insured claimant who has suffered loss or damage by reason of matters insured against by this policy and only to the extent herein described. (a) The liability of the Company under this policy sha 11 not exceed the least of: (i) the Amount of Insurance stated in Schedule A; or, (ii) the difference between the value of the insured estate or interest as insured and the value of the insured estate or interest subject t o the defect, lien or encumbrance insured against by this policy. (b) (This paragraph removed in Florida policies.) (c) The Company will pay only those costs, attorneys' fees and expenses incurred in accordance with Section 4 of the Conditions and Stipulations. 8. APPORTIONMENT. If the land described in Schedule A consists of two or more parcels which are not used as a single site, and a loss is established affecting one or more of the parcels but not all, the loss shall be computed and settled on a pro rata basis as if the amount of insurance under this policy was divided pro rata as to the value on Date of Policy of each separate parcel to the whole, exclusive of any improvements made subsequent to Date of Policy, unless a liability or value has otherwise been agreed upon as to each parcel by the Company and the insured at the time of the issuance of this policy and shown by an express statement or by an endorsement attached to this policy. 9. LIMITATION OF LIABILITY. (a) If the Company establishes the title, or removes the alleged defect, lien or encumbrance, or cures the lack of a right of access to or from the land, or cures the claim of unmarketability of title, all as insured, in a reasonably diligent manner by any method, including litigation and the completion of any appeals therefrom, it shall have fully performed its obligations with respect to that matter and shall not be liable for any loss or damage caused thereby. (b) In the event of any litigation, including litigation by the Company or with the Company's consent, the Company shall have no liability for loss or damage until there has been a final determination by a court of competent jurisdiction, and disposition of all appeals therefrom, adverse to the title as insured. (c) The Company shall not be liable for loss or damage to any insured for liability voluntarily assumed by the insured in settling any claim or suit without the prior written consent of the Company. (continued) (ALTA wNO Policy) REME VED APR 0 2 2007 PLANNING DEPAWWENT CITY OF CLEARWATER CONDITIONS AND STIPULATIONS Continued 10. REDUCTION OF INSURANCE; REDUCTION OR TERMINATION OF LIABILITY. All payments under this policy, except payments made for costs, attorneys' fees and expenses, shall reduce the amount of the insurance pro Canto. 11. LIABILITY NONCUMULATIVE. It is expressly understood that the amount of insurance under this policy shall be reduced by any amount the Company may pay under any policy insuring a mortgage to which exception is taken in Schedule B or to which the insured has agreed, assumed, or taken subject, or which is hereafter executed by an insured and which is a charge or lien on the estate or interest described or referred to in Schedule A, and the amount so paid shall be deemed a payment under this policy to the insured owner. 12. PAYMENT OF LOSS. (a) No payment shall be made without producing this policy for endorsement of the payment unless the policy has been lost or destroyed, in which case proof of loss or destruction shall be furnished to the satisfaction of the Company. (b) When liability and the extent of loss or damage has been definitely fixed in accordance with these Conditions and Stipulations, the loss or damage shall be payable within 30 days thereafter. 13. SUBROGATION UPON PAYMENT OR SETTLEMENT. (a) The Company's Right of Subrogation. Whenever the Company shall have settled and paid a claim under this policy, all right of subrogation shall vest in the Company unaffected by any act of the insured claimant. The Company shall be subrogated to and be entitled to all rights and remedies which the insured claimant would have had against any person or property in respect to the claim had this policy not been issued. If requested by the Company, the insured claimant shall transfer to the Company all rights and remedies against any person or property necessary in order to perfect this right of subrogation. The insured claimant shall permit the Company to sue, compromise or settle in the name of the insured claimant and to use the name of the insured claimant in any transaction or litigation involving these rights or remedies. I f a payment on account of a claim does not fully cover the loss of the insured claimant, the Company shall be subrogated to these rights and remedies in the proportion which the Company's payment bears to the whole amount of the loss. If loss should result from any act of the insured claimant, as stated above, that act shall not void this policy, but the Company, in that event, shall be required to pay only that part of any losses insured against by this policy which shall exceed the amount, if any, lost to the Company by reason of the impairment by the insured claimant of the Company's right of subrogation. (b) The Company's Rights Against Non - insured Obligors. The Company's right of subrogation against non - insured obligors shall exist and shall include, without limitation, the rights of the insured to indemnities, guaranties, other policies of insurance or bonds, notwithstanding any terms or conditions contained in those instruments which provide for subrogation rights by reason of this policy. 14. ARBITRATION Unless prohibited by applicable law, arbitration pursuant to the Title Insurance Arbitration Rules of the American Arbitration Association may be demanded if agreed to by both the Company and the insured Arbitrable matters may include but are not limited to any controversy or claim between the Company and the insured arising out of or relating to this policy, any service of the Company in connection with its issuance or the breach of a policy provision or other obligation Arbritration pursuant to this policy and under the Rules in effect on the date the demand for arbitration is made or, at the option of the insured the Rules in effect at Date of Policy shall be binding upon the parties. The award may include attorneys' fees only if the laws of the state in which the land is located permit a court to award attorneys' fees to aaprevailing party. Judgment upon the award rendered by the Arbitrator(s) may be entered in any court having jurisdiction thereof The law of the situs of the land shall apply to an arbitration under the Title Insurance Arbitration Rules. A copy of the Rules may be obtained from the company upon request. 15. LIABILITY LIMITED TO THIS POLICY; POLICY ENTIRE CONTRACT . (a) This policy together with all endorsements, if any, attached hereto by the Company is the entire policy and contract between the insured and the Company. In interpreting any provision of this policy, this policy shall be construed as a whole. (b) Any claim of loss or damage, whether or not based on negligence, and which arises out of the status of the title to the estate or interest covered hereby or by any action asserting such claim, shall be restricted to this policy. (c) No amendment of or endorsement to this policy can be made except by a writing endorsed hereon or attached hereto signed by either the President, a Vice President, the Secretary, an Assistant Secretary, or validating officer or authorized signatory of the Company. 16. SEVERABILITY. In the event any provision of the policy is held invalid or unenforceable under applicable law, the policy shall be deemed not to include that provision and all other provisions shall remain in full force and effect. 17. NOTICES, WHERE SENT. All notices required to be given the Company and any statement in writing required to be furnished the Company shall include the number of this policy and shall be addressed to the Company at P.O. Box 2029, Houston, Texas 77252 -2029. (ALTA Owner's Policy) ORIGIN& RECEIVED AIN 022007 PLANNING DEPA�jMi l CITY OF CLEApWATFF STEWART TITLE GUARANTY COMPANY �f Return to: Title First Name: K. Knoop Address: 53381" Ave N. O(� St. Petersburg, FL 33710 60 This Instrument Prepared: Karen Knoop /t �O Title First, Inc. �v U 2280 4th Street North St. Petersburg, Florida 33704 as a necessary incident to the fulfillment of conditions contained in a title insurance commitment issued by it. Property Appraisers Parcel I.D. (Folio) Number(s): 15/29/15/59292/001 /0320 Grantee(s) S.S. #(s): File No:501823 0, KEN BURKE, CLERK OF COURT PINELLAS COUNTY FLORIDA INST# 2006322192 08/29/2006 at 11:02 AM OFF REC BK: 15333 PG: 1260 -1250 DocType:DEED RECORDING: $10.00 D DOC STAMP: $1190.00 WARRANTY DEED This Warranty Deed Made the A O day of August, 2006, by Katherine Ann Zevetchin, a single woman, hereinafter called the grantor, whose post office address is: SE 1, 's+ u 33705' to Opti Development, Inc., a Florida Corporation, whose post office address is: 3348 Tyrone Blvd., St. Petersburg, FL 33710 hereinafter called the grantee, WITNESSETH: That said grantor, for and in consideration of the sum of $10.00 Dollars and other valuable considerations, receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, hereby grants, bargains, sells, aliens, remises, releases, conveys and confirms unto the grantee, all that certain land situate in Pinellas County, Florida, viz: The East Five feet of Lot 30, and ALL of Lots 31, 32, 33, and 34, in Block A, MOUNT ORANGE REVISED PLAT, according to the plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 6, Page 46, .Pinellas County, Florida The property is the homestead of the Grantor(s). TOGETHER with all the tenements, hereditaments and appurtenances thereto belonging or in anywise appertaining. To Have and to Hold, the same in fee simple forever. And the grantor hereby covenants with said grantee that the grantor is lawfully seized of said land in fee simple; that the grantor has good right and lawful authority to sell and convey said land; that the grantor hereby,fully warrants the title to said land and will defend the same against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever; and that said land is free of all encumbrances, except taxes accruing subsequent to 2006, reservations, restrictions and easements of record, if any. (The terms "grantor" and "grantee" herein shall be construed to include all genders and singular or plural as the context indicates.) In Witness Whereof, Grantor has hereunto set grantor's hand and seal the day and year first above written. Signed, sealed and delivered in our presence: r Witness Signature: Printed Name: )(,, heh / _ �/ �� (� at erine Ann Zevetchin VP Witness Signature: 1 Printed Name: C �1 0 644l1Ct STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF Pinellas The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this s-,?) 0 day of August, 2006, by Katherine Ann Zevetchin, a single woman, who is /are personally known to me or who has/have produced driver license(s) as identification. My Commission Expires: Karen L. Knoop Karin L. Knoop" Commission # OD550610 Notary Public �c Expires August 31, 2009 Serial Number �` 5ondedTmyFw- 11W-nceJK 800. 385.7019 ORIGINAL RECEIVED APR 0 21007 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CiiY OF CLEARWATEp S�gLw 3/6/2007 Receipt #: 1200700000000002005 2:50:57PM p = Date: 03/06/2007 Line Items: Case No Tran Code Description Revenue Account No -Amount Paid FLD2007 -03010 04 Flexible Residential (SFR) 010 - 341262 200.00 Line Item Total: $200.00 Payments: Method Payer Initials Check No Confirm No How Received Amount Paid Check OPTI DEV INC R D 259 In Person 200 Payment Total: $200.00 THIS IS NOT A PERMIT. This is a receipt for an application for a permit. This application will be reviewed and you will be notified as to the outcome of the application. cReceipt.rpt Page 1 of 1 PLANNING DEPARTMENT July 23, 2007 Ms. Mary S. Sullivan 200 Beach Drive NE, #8 St. Petersburg, Florida 33701 ITY OF CLEARWATER POST OFFICE BOX 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758 -47448 MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562 -4567 FAX (727) 562 -4865 Re: FLD2007 -03010 — 808 Ewing Avenue Dear Ms. Sullivan: This letter constitutes a Development Order pursuant to Section 4- 206.D.6 of the Community Development Code. On July 17, 2007, the Community Development Board (CDB) reviewed your Flexible Development application to reduce the minimum lot size from 5,000 square feet to 4,467 square feet in association with the creation of a new parcel for a detached dwelling (single - family residence) within the Low Medium Density Residential (LMDR) District as a Residential Infill Project, pursuant to Section 2 -204.E of the Community Development Code. The CDB APPROVED. the application with conditions based upon the following findings of fact and conclusions of law. Findings of Fact: 1. That the 0.26 -acre subject property is located at the northwest corner of Ewing Avenue and Jasmine. Way, and if subdivided will create a 0.102 -acre (4,467 square foot) north lot and a 0.174 -acre (7,593 square foot) south lot; 2. That the subject property is located within the Low Medium Density Residential (LMDR) District; 3. That the subject property is located within the Residential Urban (RU) Future Land Use Plan category; and 4. That there are no outstanding Code Enforcement issues associated with the subject property. Conclusions of Law: 1. That the development proposal is consistent with the applicable Standards and Criteria as per Sections 2- 201.1 and 2 -204 of the Community. Development Code; 2. That the development proposal is inconsistent with the Flexibility criteria as per Section 2- 204.B.1 of the Community Development Code (Detached Dwelling); 3. That the development proposal is consistent with the Flexibility criteria as per Sections 2- 204.B.2 and 3 of the Community Development Code. (Detached Dwelling); 4. That the development proposal is consistent with the Flexibility criteria as per Section 2 -204.E of the Community Development Code (Residential Infill Project); and 5. That the development proposal is consistent with the General Standards for Level One and Level Two. Approvals as per Section 3 -913.A of the Community Development Code. Conditions of Approval: 1. That prior to the submittal of a building permit application for the new single - family detached dwelling on the north lot, a Minor Lot Adjustment be approved by the Planning Department; FRANK HIBBARD, MAYOR JOHN DORAN, COUNCILMEMBER J.B. JOHNSON, COUNCILMEMBER BILL JONSON, COUNCILMEMBER CARLEN A. PETERSEN, COUNCILMEMBER "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER" July 23, 2007 FLD2007 -03010 (808 Ewing Avenue) Page 2 of 2 2. That prior to the submittal for a Minor Lot Adjustment, the existing concrete on the proposed north lot and that concrete on the south lot within five feet of the property line between the north and south lots must be removed; 3. That the newly created north lot is to be exclusively used as a single- family detached dwelling; and 4. That the total square footage of all buildings built on the north lot shall be no more than ten percent greater than the average volume to lot size ratio of all existing buildings within 500 feet of the lot (1,296 square feet). Pursuant to Section 4-407 of the Community Development Code, an application for a building permit shall be made within one year of a Flexible Development approval (by July 17, 2008). All required Certificates of Occupancy must be obtained within two years of the date of issuance of the initial building permit. Plea -se be advised that time frames do not change with successive owners. The Community Development Coordinator may grant an extension of time for a period not to exceed one year and only within the original period of validity of the Development Order. The CDB may approve one additional extension of time after the Community Development Coordinator's extension to initiate a building permit application. The issuance of this Development Order does not relieve you of the necessity to obtain any building permits or pay any impact fees that may be required. In order to facilitate the issuance of any permit or license affected by this approval, please bring a copy of this letter with you when applying for any permits or licenses that require this prior development approval. Additionally, an appeal of a Level Two approval (Flexible Development) may be initiated pursuant to Section 4- 502.B of the Community Development Code by the applicant or by any person granted party status within 14 days of the date of the CDB meeting. The filing of an application/notice of appeal shall stay the effect of the decision pending the final determination of the case. The appeal period for your case expires on July 31, 2007 (14 days from the date of the CDB meeting). Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact Robert G. Tefft, Planner III at (727) 562 -4539 or via e -mail at robert.tefft a,myclearwater.com. Sincerely, er A_40� Michael Delk, AICP Planning Director S:0anning DepartmentlC D BIFLEX (FLD)Ilnaciive or Finished ApplicationslE STREET - FT HARRISOMEwingAve 808 (LMDR) ApproveMwing Ave 808 - Development Order 07- 23- 07.doc PLANNTING DEPARTMENT May 14, 2007 Ms. Mary S. Sullivan 200 Beach Drive NE, #8 St. Petersburg, Florida 33701 C G-' 1rT '; OF CLEARWATER POST OFFICE Box 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758 -4748 1 \4f iN;CIPAL SER�`ICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562 -4567 FAx (727) 562 -4865 Re: FLD2007 -03010 — 808 Ewing Avenue Dear Ms. Sullivan: This letter is provided to you as the designated agent for the above referenced application. As of the above date, no response has been received with regard to the comments of the Development Review Committee (DRC) from May 4, 2007. Revised plans addressing those comments are necessary in order for the application to proceed before the Community Development Board (CDB). If it is still your intent to proceed with this application, then the resubmittal of revised plans addressing the comments of the DRC would need to be made to our office on or before Noon, Monday, June 18, 2007, in order to be scheduled for the CDB meeting of July 17, 2007. Please be advised that if revised plans are not received by above referenced date, then the application will be considered to be withdrawn. Once withdrawn, a new application and submittal fee will be required in order to pursue this development proposal. Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, Robert G. Tefft, Planner III Tel: (727) 562 -4539 Fax: (727) 562 -4865 E -Mail: roberuef ftEyn 1 %clecafiI %ater.corn I I ANN HIBBARD, _�AAYOR �OTlt`. iOkAi', CG'J1'4ai' :?.-ErR J.B. JOHNSON, COUNCIL;MEMBER BPl ONSON, COUNCILLiEMBER ORLEN A. PETERSEN, COUNCILMEMBER 'F UF,L _ ;-MPLO1b�IENT fJ1D Pi.FFIP.MF.'CI`JE ACTION EMPLOY.EP" 11.40 am Case Number: FLD2007 -03010 -- 808 EWING AVE Owner(s): Opti Development Inc 3348 Tyrone Blvd St Petersburg, F133710 TELEPHONE: No Phone, FAX: No Fax, E- MAIL.: No Email Representative: Mary S Sullivan 200 Beach Drive Ne, #8 St. Petersburg, F133701 TELEPHONE: 727 - 892 -9999, FAX: 727 - 822 -1104, E -MAIL: MARY. SULLIVAN @HOMEVESTORS.COM Location: 0.273 -acre parcel at the northwest corner of Ewing Avenue and Jasmine Way Atlas Page: 296A Zoning District: LMDR, Low Medium Density Residential Request: Flexible Development approval to reduce the minimum lot width from 5,000 square feet to 4,150 square feet for a detached dwelling within the Low Medium Density Residential (LMDR) District pursuant to Section 2 -204.B of the Community Development Code. Proposed Use: Detached dwelling Neighborhood Clearwater Neighborhoods Coalition Association(s): Clearwater, F133758 P O Box 8204 TELEPHONE: No Phone, FAX: No Fax, E -MAIL: No Email Neighborhood Harbor Oaks Neighborhood Assoc Association(s): Clearwater, Fl 33756 320 Magnolia Drive TELEPHONE: 461 -9657, FAX: No Fax, E -MAIL: No Email Presenter: Robert Tefft, Planner III Attendees Included: The DRC reviewed this application with the following comments: General Engineering: 1 . No issues. Environmental: I . No Issues. Fire: I , No Issues Harbor Master: 1 . No issues Legal: I . No issues Land Resources: I , No Issues. Landscaping: I . No issues. Parks and Recreation: I . No issues - division of lots with existing structures. If land is redeveloped, P &R fees may apply at that time. Stormwater: I . No Issues. Solid Waste: No Comments Traffic Engineering: I . No Issues. Planning: Development Review Agenda - Thursday, May 3, 2007 - Page 22 I . The application includes a request for a minor lot line adjustment to shift the west property line eastward five feet consistent with the originally platted lot line between lots 30 and 31 so as to address a fence constructed across the property line. Shifting this property line five feet eastward would result in a smaller lot size than is necessary for the proposed lot where a deviation is already necessary for the proposed lot size. Further, such a deviation would result in a wide section of property being left as a "no man's land" between the new property line and the existing fence. This part of the request is not supportable. It is instead recommended that the fence be relocated along the existing property line. 2. The proposed Division of Lots survey prepared for the north lot depicts a proposed parking area that has no apparent relevence to the request as well as a two -story frame residence that no longer exists. Provide a revised Division of Lots survey. 3. The proposed property line between the proposed 804 and 808 lots bisects existing pavement. As pavement is a structure, per the City's code, it must meet setbacks. The concrete will be required to be removed prior to the creation of this property line. 4. The proposed Division of Lots surveys are not signed and sealed. Provide signed and sealed surveys. 5. Pursuant to Section 2- 204.B.3 of the Community Development Code, the volume to lot size ratio of the detached dwelling to be built on the proposed lot shall not be greater than 10% of the average volume to lot size ratio of all existing structures within 500 feet of the proposed lot. The application provides a statement of compliance for this criterion, it does not provided any data pertaining to the volume to lot size ratio of existing structures within 500 feet. 6. Pursuant to Section 2- 204.B.1 of the Community Development Code, a lot size less than 5,000 square feet is permissable when the lot is existing or when necessary to the development/redevelopment of a vacant lot which would otherwise not be economically feasible. The request is not for existing development on a lot less than 5,000 square feet or for development/redevelopment of an existing vacant lot, but instead for the creation of a new lot; thus compliance with this criterion cannot be achieved. As compliance cannot be achieved, it is recommended that the request be submitted as a Residential Infill Redevelopment application. Other: No Comments Notes: While this application can be deemed sufficient provided the correct application is submitted, the Planning Department does not support the approval of this application. Revisions addressing the above comments must be submitted by Noon, May 11, 2007. Development Review Agenda - Thursday, May 3, 2007 - Page 23 CITY OF CLEARWATER LL PLANNING DEPARTMENT °. 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE earwa er 0 1 ''1 111% '' 1%, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TEL: (727) 562 -4567 FAX: (727) 562 -4865 Date: To: From: Re: Comments: FACSIMILE COVER SHEET May 1, 2007 Candace or Mary S. Sullivan, (727) 456 -7299 Robert G. Tefft, Planner III FLD2007 -03010 (808 Ewing Avenue) Number of Pages Including Cover Sheet: 3 ** Please confirm receipt via e-mail at: robert. teffiRmyclearwater. coin ** ** Visit the Planning Department online at www.myclearwater.com ** May. 01 2007 01:24PM YOUR LOGO' YOUR FAX NO. ::7275624865 NO. OTHER FACSIMILE START TIME USAGE TIMEI MODE PAGES RESULT 01 94567299 May.01 01:23PM 01'06 SND 03 OK TO TURN OFF REPORT, PRESS 'MENU' #04. THEN SELECT OFF BY USING ' +' OR ' -'. FOR FAX ADVANTAGE ASSISTANCE, PLEASE CALL 1- 800 - HELP -FAX (435- 7329). PLANNING DEPARTMENT April 3, 2007 Ms. Mary S. Sullivan 200 Beach Drive NE, #8 St. Petersburg, Florida 33701 UITY OF C LEARWATE.R POST OFFICE Box 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758 -4748 MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAx (727) 562 -4865 Re: FLD2007 -03010 — 808 Ewing Avenue — Letter of Completeness Dear Ms. Sullivan: The Planning Department staff has entered your application into the Department's filing system and assigned the case number FLD2007- 03010. After a preliminary review of the submitted documents, staff has determined that the application is complete. The Development Review Committee (DRC) will review the application for sufficiency on Thursday, May 3, 2007, in the Planning Department Conference Room (Room 216), which is located on the second floor of the Municipal Services Building at 100 South Myrtle Avenue. You will be contacted by the Planning Department's Administrative Analyst within one week prior to the meeting date for the approximate time that your case will be reviewed. You or your representative (as applicable) must be present to answer any questions that the DRC may have regarding your application. Additional comments may be generated by the DRC. at the time of the meeting. Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, Robert G. Tefft, Planner III Tel: (727) 562 -4539 Fax: (727) 562 -4865 E -Mail: robert .tefftL&niycleai-ivater.com FRANK HIBBARD, MAYOR JOHN DORAN, COUNCILMEMBER J.B. JOHNSON, COUNCILMEMBER BILL JONSON, COUNCILMEMBER CARLEN A. PETERSEN, COUNCILMEMBER "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER" . CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TEL: (727) 562 -4567 FAX: (727) 562 -4865 °Clearwater III, IIIII FACSIMILE COVER SHEET Date: April 3, 2007 To: Mary S. Sullivan, (727) 822 -1104 From: �obert G. Tefft, Planner III Re: FLD2007 -03010 (808 Ewing Avenue) Number of Pages Including Cover Sheet: 2 Comments: ** Please confirm receipt via e-mail at: robert.tefftna,myclearwater.com ** ** Visit the Planning Department online at www.mvclearwater.com ** j Apr. 03 2007 01:33PM YOUR LOGO YOUR FAX NO. 7275624865 NO. OTHER FACSIMILE START TIME USAGE TIME MODE PAGES RESULT 01 98221104 Apr.03 01:31PM 01'11 SND 02 OK TO TURN OFF REPORT, PRESS MB,,P J #04. THEN SELECT OFF BY USING ' +' OR FOR FAX ADVANTAGE ASSISTANCE, PLEASE CALL 1- 800-HE P -FAX 0435- 73291. Opti Development Inc. 200 Beach Drive #8 St. Petersburg, FL, 33701 727- 892 -9999 Fax 727 - 822 -1104 Cell 727- 772 -3210 optidevelopment (ii),homevestors.com _-Uf- i ayne M. Wells Planning Department 100 south Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, Fl 33756 -4748 RE: Flexible Development Application 808/806/804 Ewing Ave. Parcel No. 15/29/15/59292/001 /0320 Dear Mr. Wells: Enclosed please find Opti Development, Inc.'s Application for Flexible Development for the referenced parcel. Please note we seek to partition the parcel creating two parcels. One at 808 Ewing containing the existing single dwelling block structure, and a second vacant lot, suitable for construction of a single dwelling structure at 804 Ewing. Further, we seek to adjust the side lot line at platted Lots 30/31 to address a fence constructed across the property line. This would reestablish the originally platted Lot 30 and allow the fence to wholly rest on Lot 30. Please feel free to contact me at the above numbers with any questions. Very truly yours MOW RED Mary SJSl1rivan+ APR 0 2 2007 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF OLEARWATER EXHIBIT C i . I t....thSn�3. �i�t L�L.S '9' QllcsrbS II ORIGINAL„ RECEIVED JUN 12 2007 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER w4y OR LVE z ORIGINAL an n S c n, RECEIVED JUN 12 2007 PLANNING DEPARTMENT- <-- CITY-OF CLEARWAIER 1C - cc 4:2 w4y OR LVE z ORIGINAL an n S c n, RECEIVED JUN 12 2007 PLANNING DEPARTMENT- <-- CITY-OF CLEARWAIER �05 tv"FA (%(Vuv- 96e a �6 2A U FJ 0 f2�� • 0 Y'�'� nM,....,. ,:� ,: 0 0 Cf o N �3 r. W Q� v a 0 0 L) 4-rIt c_ J &sw�,iwe �C 0 0 W Q U a 4 �..� j '� .t j �± ,cam,�c,, :.�.. i ZlJ W `— o 3 uj N W 0 OR O Z � Z o gv a i r� X v x4` �; ORIGINAL RECEIVED JUN T 2 2007 PLANNING DEFARMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER Z� W `2 Q W N W �uUa z0 Z g� 0 • ORIGINAL RECEIVED JUN 12 2001 pLANNING DEPARTMENT CIPI OF CLEARWATER e 0 Z� W Q G N 7! O U � U 0 p '3 U a e 0 �sr i E z� W L� N H Q W �u W zD IX �U i E g 1 w+ e „i s A p • Zy1 W C Q © C � rya�j tL W C c � J L{7 Z Q e d • a mini . . . . . . . . . . . . . ............. z� W o fl N a W =j ui �uuj a U Zp 0� 7 U a 0 ORIGINAL. RECEIVED JUN 12 2001 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER EXHIBIT B ORIGINAL RECEIVED JUN 12 2007 PLANNING ©EPARIMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER Pin-el-a-s P=per7v 15 29 ': 5 5 9 2' 9,_- 0 0 73 07 ;JUC� A rn 7 0- -IN > tr' zr 7, cc mj CC Sj 5 C NE V'\ WAY ;JUC� A rn 7 > zr 7, cc mj NE V'\ WAY 7C. y. oo.11 . 5iD !CC 1A OR LVE 71:. 1 T- Zi yes o 1- LC Pinellas County Property Appraiser Parcel Information RECEIVED 1_2 2007 F PLANNING DEPAR IMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER 7 7C. y. oo.11 . 5iD !CC 1A OR LVE 71:. 1 T- Zi yes o 1- LC Pinellas County Property Appraiser Parcel Information RECEIVED 1_2 2007 F PLANNING DEPAR IMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER E "RIGll�gt P6CEIVED JUN 121001 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER • 0 z- a�- JU LU LLJ cl, --I ortr a. x ,�'@ t, +. FA�jl�yc. i1 f�• - r'�� • 1r 4 '�1++ �l� g � t'' . .f r - _ �' �'. - � -i �� yam.•=', V _ q _ x 1 •i low Waft _ !1011 r a.y�� 0 ko 0 0 ORIGINAL SUBMISSION ORIGINAL, RECEIVED JUN 12 2007 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER 0 Clearwater Planning Department 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, Florida 33756 Telephone: 727-562-4567 Fax: 727-562-4865 ❑ SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION ❑ SUBMIT 14 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION -Plans and application are required to be collated, stapled, and folded into sets ❑ SUBMIT APPLICATION FEE $ CASE #: , . '12Z007 - 0 RECEIVED BY (Maff initials): DATE RECEIVED: NOTE: 15 TOTAL SETS OF INFORMATION REQUIRED (APPLICATIONS PLUS SITE PLAN SETS) FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION (Revised 03/28/2006) -PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT- A. APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A) APPLICANT NAME: MAILING ADDRESS: 77 _J_ 7- PHONE NUMBER: ? Cj FAX NUMBER: 7,3,7- PROPERTY OWNER(S): List ALL owners on the deed ck MAILING ADDRESS: j/ , AGENT NAME: -5(-� / , 1,7 D PHONE NUMBER: 7 - - FAX NUMBEk: CELL NUMBER: 7 - 7 1 E -MAIL ADDRESS: C.-C) ----) B. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A) PROJECT NAME: 6WO'11 Ly,-v �n I-ILI,? PROJECT VALUATION: STREET ADDRESS IL PARCEL NUMBER(S): s. PARCEL SIZE (acres): 3 PA CEL SIZE (square feet): LEGAL DESCRIPTION: e-j jLA PROPOSED USE(S): - ilk- DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST: e, C. Specifically identify the request (include number of units or square footage of non-residential use and all requested code deviations' e.g. reduction in required number of parking spaces, specific use, etc.) �15 7C1 .. ,7 7 b:vIlarming DepartmenOApplication Formskdevelopment review12006 Forms\Flexible Development (FLD) 2006.dOG Pagel of7 JUN 12 2007 PL4NNING DEPAIMENT C11Y OF WARMER DOES THIS APPLICATION INVOLVE THE TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS (TDR), A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, OR A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED (CERTIFIED) SITE PLAN? YES _ NO _ (if yes, attach a copy of the applicable documents) C. PROOF OF OWNERSHIP: (Code Section 4- 202.A.5) f SUBMIT A COPY OF THE TITLE INSURANCE POLICY, DEED TO THE PROPERTY OR SIGN AFFIDAVIT ATTESTING OWNERSHIP (see page 7) D. 1. WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 3- 913.A) / Provide complete responses to the six (6) GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA — Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail: The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. is J t 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety or persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use. 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize'traffic congestion. 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. 4 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts, on adjacent properties. f, rF(_. " d �, t ••!i t F � RECEIVED SiPlanning DeparlmentlApplication Formsldevelopmenl reviewk2006 FormsTlexible Development (FLD) 2006.doc �Q�� Page 2 of 7 JUN PLANNING DEPAWINENT CITY OF CLEARWATER WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Flexibility Criteria) O., Provide complete responses to the applicable flexibility criteria for the specific Use as listed in each Zoning District to which the waiver is requested (use separate sheets as necessary) — Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail: l E. STORMWATER PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteria Manual and 4- 202.A.21) ❑ A STORMWATER NARRATIVE MUST BE SUBMITTED WITH ALL APPLICATIONS. All applications that involve addition or modification of impervious surface, including buildings, must include a stormwater plan that demonstrates compliance with the City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteria manual. A reduction in impervious surface area does not qualify as an exemption to this requirement. ❑ If a plan is not required, the narrative shall provide an explanation as to why the site is exempt. ❑ At a minimum, the STORMWATER PLAN shall include the following; ❑ Existing topography extending 50 feet beyond all property lines; ❑ Proposed grading including finished floor elevations of all structures; ❑ All adjacent streets and municipal storm systems; ❑ Proposed stormwater detention /retention area including top of bank, toe of slope and outlet control structure; ❑ A narrative describing the proposed stormwater control plan including all calculations and data necessary to demonstrate compliance with the City manual. ❑ Proposed stormwater detention /retention area including top of bank, toe of slope and outlet control structure; ❑ Signature and seal of Florida Registered Professional Engineer on all plans and calculations. ❑ COPY OF PERMIT INQUIRY LETTER OR SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT (SWFWMD) PERMIT SUBMITTAL (SWFWMD approval is required prior to issuance of City Building Permit), if applicable L4, ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF STORMWATER PLAN REQUIREMENTS (Applicant must initial one of the following): Stormwater plan as noted above is included Stormwater plan is not required and explanation narrative is attached. At a minimum, a grading plan and finished floor ' r elevations shall be provided. CAUTION — IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A STORMWATER PLAN AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 562 -4750. F. SUPPLEMENTAL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 4- 202.A) C7, SIGNED AND SEALED SURVEY (including legal description of property) — One original and 14 copies; ❑ TREE SURVEY (including existing trees on site and within 25' of the adjacent site, by species, size (DBH 4" or greater), and location, including drip lines and indicating trees to be removed) — please design around the existing trees; ❑ TREE INVENTORY; prepared by a "certified arborist ", of all trees 8" DBH or greater, reflecting size, canopy (drip lines) and condition of such trees;. ©' LOCATION MAP OF THE PROPERTY; ❑ PARKING DEMAND STUDY in conjunction with a request to make deviations to the parking standards (ie. Reduce number of spaces). Prior to the submittal of this application, the methodology of such study shall be approved by the Community Development Coordinator and shall be in accordance with accepted traffic engineering principles. The findings of the study will be used in determining whether or not deviations to the parking standards are approved; ❑ GRADING PLAN, as applicable; ❑ PRELIMINARY PLAT, as required (Note: Building permits will not be issued until evidence of recording a final plat is provided); ❑ COPY OF RECORDED PLAT, as applicable; It7W/1L �ECEIVED S1Planning Department\Application FormsWevelopment review12006 Forms \Flexible Development (FLD) 2006.doc ,, � { ";..pI Page 3 of 7 JUN 1 � .2007 PL;ANNINO,DEWWENT C11Y OF CLEARWATER G. SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4- 202.A) O SITE PLAN with the following information (not to exceed 24" x 36 "): Index sheet referencing individual sheets included in package; North arrow; Engineering bar scale (minimum scale one inch equals 50 feet), and date prepared; All dimensions; — Footprint and size of all EXISTING buildings and structures; Footprint and size of all PROPOSED buildings and structures; All required setbacks; All existing and proposed points of access; All required sight triangles; Identification of environmentally unique areas, such as watercourses, wetlands, tree masses, and specimen trees, including _ description and location of understory, ground cover vegetation and wildlife habitats, etc; Location of all public and private easements; Location of all street rights -of -way within and adjacent to the site; Location of existing public and private utilities, including fire hydrants, storm and sanitary sewer lines, manholes and lift stations, gas and water lines; All parking spaces, driveways, loading areas and vehicular use areas; Depiction by shading or crosshatching of all required parking lot interior landscaped areas; Location of all solid waste containers, recycling or trash handling areas and outside mechanical equipment and all required screening (per Section 3- 201(D)(i) and Index #701); Location of all landscape material; Location of all onsite and offsite storm -water management facilities; Location of all outdoor lighting fixtures; and Location of all existing and proposed sidewalks. Q SITE DATA TABLE for existing, required, and proposed development, in written /tabular form: EXISTING Land area in square feet and acres; Number of EXISTING dwelling units; Number of PROPOSED dwelling units; Gross floor area devoted to each use; Parking spaces: total number, presented in tabular form with the number of required spaces; Total paved area, including all paved parking spaces & driveways, expressed in square feet & percentage of the paved vehicular area; Official records book and page numbers of all existing utility _ easement; Building and structure heights; Impermeable surface ratio (I.S.R.); and Floor area ratio (F.A.R.) for all nonresidential uses. O REDUCED COLOR SITE PLAN to scale (8 % X 11); FOR DEVELOPMENTS OVER ONE ACRE, provide the following additional information on site plan: One -foot contours or spot elevations on site; Offsite elevations if required to evaluate the proposed stormwater management for the parcel; All open space areas; Location of all earth or water retaining walls and earth berms; Lot lines and building lines (dimensioned); Streets and drives (dimensioned); Building and structural setbacks (dimensioned); Structural overhangs; REQUIRED PROPOSED PECEMED 1._l::i,:: JUN 1 2.2001 PLANNING,c E ARTMEW, >>�l CITY OF CtII�TT,.:,,;,,: S: \Planning Department\Application Forms\development review \2006 Forms \Flexible Development (FLD) 2006.doc Page 4 of 7 H. LANDSCAPING PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4- 1102.A) ❑ LANDSCAPE PLAN with the following information (not to exceed 24" x 36 "): All existing and proposed structures; Names of abutting streets; Drainage and retention areas including swales, side slopes and bottom elevations; Delineation and dimensions of all required perimeter landscape buffers; Sight visibility triangles; Delineation and dimensions of all parking areas including landscaping islands and curbing; Existing trees on -site and immediately adjacent to the site, by species, size and locations, including driplines (as indicated on required tree survey); Location, size, and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, indicated by a key relating to the plant schedule; Plant schedule with a key (symbol or label) indicating the size, description, specifications, quantities, and spacing requirements of all existing and proposed landscape materials, including botanical and common names; Typical planting details for trees, palms, shrubs and ground cover plants including instructions, soil mixes, backfilling, mulching and protective measures; Interior landscaping areas hatched and /or shaded and labeled and interior landscape coverage, expressing in both square feet and percentage covered; Conditions of a previous development approval (e.g. conditions imposed by the Community Development Board); Irrigation notes. ❑ REDUCED COLOR LANDSCAPE PLAN to scale (8 Yz X 11); ❑ COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM application, as applicable. Landscape associated with the Comprehensive Landscape Program shall exceed minimum Code requirements to offset the areas where minimum Code will not be met. I. BUILDING ELEVATION PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4- 202.A.23) ❑ BUILDING ELEVATION DRAWINGS — with the following information; All sides of all buildings; Dimensioned; Colors (provide one full sized set of colored elevations); Materials; Sight visibility triangles; ❑ REDUCED BUILDING ELEVATIONS — same as above to scale on 8 % X 11. J. SIGNAGE: (Division 19. SIGNS / Section 3 -1806) ❑ All EXISTING freestanding and attached signs; Provide photographs and dimensions (area, height, etc.), indicate whether they will be removed or to remain. ❑ All PROPOSED freestanding and attached signs; Provide details including location, size, height, colors, materials and drawing; freestanding signs shall include the street address (numerals) ❑ Comprehensive Sign Program application, as applicable (separate application and fee required). ❑ Reduced signage proposal (8 % X 11) (color), if submitting Comprehensive Sign Program application. SAPlanning DepartmenllApplicalion Forms \development review \2006 Forms \Flexible Development (FLD) 2006.doc Page 5 of 7 j P .ECEIYED 12 207, PIA ,N1NO DEN CITY OF CLFJRRMER K. TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY: (Section 4- 202.A.13 and 4- 801.C) 0 Include if required by the Traffic Operations Manager or his /her designee or if the proposed development: • Will degrade the acceptable level of service for any roadway as adopted in the Comprehensive Plan. • Will generate 100 or more new vehicle directional trips per hour and /or 1000 or more new vehicle trips per day. • Will affect a nearby roadway segment and /or intersection with five (5) reportable accidents within the prior twelve (12) month period or that is on the City's annual list of most hazardous intersections. Trip generation shall be based on the most recent edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineer's (ITE) Trip General Manual. The Traffic Impact Study must be prepared in accordance with a "Scoping Meeting" held with the Traffic Operations Manager and the Planning Department's Development Review Manager or their designee (727- 562 -4750) Refer to Section 4 -801 C of the Community Development Code for exceptions to this requirement. O* / Acknowledgement of traffic impact study requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following): Traffic Impact Study is included. The study must include a summary table of pre- and post - development levels of service for all roadway legs and each turning movement at all intersections identified in the Scoping.Meeting. Traffic Impact Study is not required. CAUTION — IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 562- 4750. L. FIRE FLOW CALCULATIONS/ WATER STUDY: Provide Fire Flow Calculations. Water Study by a FIRE PROTECTION ENGINEER to assure an adequate water supply is available and to determine if any upgrades are required by the developer due to the impact of this project. The water supply must be able to support the needs of any required fire sprinkler, standpipe and/or fire pump. If a fire pump is required the water supply must be able to supply 150% of its rated capacity. Compliance with the 2004 Florida Fire Prevention Code to include NFPA 13, MFPA 14, NFPA 20, NFPA 291, and MFPA 1142 (Annex H) is required. b Acknowledgement of fire flow calculations /water study requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following): g..,,'; , Fire Flow Calculations/Water Study is included. € Fire Flow Calculations/Water Study is not required. CAUTION — IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A FIRE FLOW CALCULATIONS/ WATER STUDY AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Fire Prevention Department at (727) 562 -4334. M. SIGNATURE: I, the undersigned, acknowledge that all representations made in this application are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge and authorize City representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application. • � �.C. -t,.', .�J � I �'� , C'.(�-" -dam l Signature of pra4rty owner or representative 6 )e t / 2,11 STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS S �qqrn to a d subscribed before me this day of 1AQttr , A.D. 200 to me and /or by who is personally known has produc UL- as identifflipation. . No p blic, My commission expires: L SAPlanning Department\Application Forms\dev o 2Wnded *.W�lffl9bt fPa : Commission # DD603554 ";�OF ed` "e EXpioeSn -i sbfUce.Injr33285 5070,9 oos dsd is � em) m, r•,. Y 2007 r i�•i „i,,nce Sul �.�� PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWIATER N. AFFIDAVIT TO AUTHORIZE AGENT: 1. Provide names of all property owners on deed - PRINT full names: i. 2. That (I am /we are) the owner(s) and record title holder(s) of the following described property (address or general location): 3. That this property constitutes the property for which a request for a: (describe request) 4. That the undersigned (has /have) appointed and (does /do) appoint: as (his /their) agent(s) to execute any petitions or other documents necessary to affect such petition; 5. That this affidavit has been executed to induce the City of Clearwater, Florida to consider and act on the above described property; 6. That site visits to the property are necessary by City representatives in order to process this application and the owner authorizes City representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application; 7. That (1 /we), the undersigned authority, hereby certify that the foregoing is true and correct. Propertj Owner Property Owner Property Owner Property Owner STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS Before me the undersigned, an officer duly commissioned by the laws of the StState j of Florida, on this JC day of K�V` o"" I personally appeared . sdl y� who having been first duly sworn Deposes and says that he /she fully understands the contents of the affidavit that he /she signed. o�PRY p`'�, Miste99e 147. Whigham ` :Commission # DD603554 "� o` Expires February 3, 2011 OF W� BondeE Troy Fan • knlwance. Me. WO- 395.7019 Notary Public ature Notary Seal /Stamp My Commission Expires: �. •.tom i ;! s;,. SAPlanning Department\Application Forms \development review \2006 FormsTlexible Development (FLD) 2006.doc Page 7 of 7 JUN 122007 PLANNING DEPMCI TENT CITY OF CLEARWATER FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION Owner: Opti Development, Inc. Location: 808,806,804 Ewing Ave. B. Proposed Development Information and Description of Request: Owner, Opti Development, Inc. seeks to create 2 lots (808 Ewing with existing block structure, and a second vacant build able lot 804 Ewing) from a single 11,475 square foot corner parcel located at 808, 806, and 804 Ewing Ave. And to address a side fence that is constructed across the abutting property line by granting a small portion of the lot to the abutter. The parcel is in a Low Medium Density Residential District ( "LMDR" ). The parcel currently contains three units consisting of a single family block structure at 808 Ewing and a two unit two story frame structure at 804 Ewing. This request for flexible development stems from a fire creating an unsafe condition in the two unit wood frame structure located at 804 Ewing. Demolition, Tree Removal and Grubbing Permits have issued for the demolition of the two story frame structure and removal of a large oak tree in the center of 804 Ewing. Opti seeks to: 1. Divide the existing parcel into two parcels consisting of a.) 804 Ewing: a northerly located vacant build able parcel of approximately 4,150 square feet and b.) 808 Ewing: a southerly parcel of approximately 7,055 square feet containing the existing single family block home. 2. Further, Opti seeks to address a misplaced side fence which currently crosses the property line by granting the East 5 feet of Lot 30 Block A to the abutting property owner of Lot 30 in order to reestablish the original platted Lot 30 and thereby allow the existing abutter's fence to be established wholly on Lot 30 rather than crossing the property line onto Lot 31 as currently constructed. D. Written Submittal Requirements: The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. The proposed southerly parcel contains a single family dwelling presently in scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of the adjacent single family homes on Jasmine Way. 5N �' RIGINAL EDVED J UN .2`2007 1140 Ut A f t�l CfW pE ER Page 2 The proposed vacant lot will be suitable for a newly constructed detached dwelling meeting the guidelines articulated in Section 2 -204. Flexible development criteria Table 2 -204 "LMDR" District Flexible Development. Specifically the new lot size ranges between 3,000 -5,000 sq. ft. The lot width exceeds 50'. The area allows for minimum front, side, and rear setbacks of 15 -25, 2 -5, 5 -15 feet, respectfully, to be observed. Further, the Maximum height limitation of 30' is consistent with abutting properties on Ewing and Jasime Way. The proposed lot also permits room for a minimum of Off — Street Parking of 2 /unit. 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof because the adjacent land and buildings are developed on Ewing and Jasmine Way. The adjacent land on Druid Rd. contains a multi family structure whose use is established and whose value is not impaired by the construction of a detached dwelling with the articulated setbacks at 804 Ewing. 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety or persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use because there will be no health or safety changes stemming from a similar detached single family dwelling. 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion because it will reduce the number of dwelling units from 3 to two at this location. A reduction in living units will reduce and minimize traffic congestion associated with the reduction of one unit at this location. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the proposed two parcels because it seeks to maintain detached single family dwelling use consistent with the character of the existing single family dwelling units on Jasmine Way and Ewing Ave. The multiple units on Druid abutting the parcel relate and face away from Jasmine and Ewing towards Druid. The proposed use for a single family detached residential use is in keeping with the community character of residential use of all abutting parcels. 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic, olfactory and hours of operation impacts on adjacent properties because the proposed use is consistent with detached single story, single family visual effect. Noise, smell, and hours of use are the same as the residential detached dwellings structures surrounding and abutting the proposed parcels on Jasmine and Ewing Ave. The multi - family adjacent on Druid Ave. is a residential structure conforming with acoustic, olfactory and hours of operation as the proposed residential dwelling use. . `DR!GINAL PI CllY: aFtLtAg ATER Page 3 Flexible Development Proposal 808, 806, 804 Ewing Ave. The Flexibility Criteria for B. Detached Dwellings: . 1. By creating a lot size of less than 5,000 square feet is necessary for the redevelopment of 804 Ewing Ave, because it provides a 5 ` side line set back for the existing block structure at 808 Ewing without increasing the density of the location. 2. Access is provided to the North lot by frontage on Ewing Ave. Access to the South lot is provided by frontage on Ewing Ave. and Jasmine Way. 3. No structure is proposed to be developed on the North lot now; however it is agreed that the volume to lot size ratio of any structure to be developed on the lot is no more than ten percent greater than the average volume to lot size ratio of all existing structures within 500 feet of the lot. 4, 5, 6. The proposal does not request reductions in front, rear, or side setbacks. E. Stormwater Plan Submittal Applicant acknowledges that stormwater plan is not required because the application does not involve the addition or modification of impervious surfaces. F. Signed and sealed survey and location map of property provided. K. Traffic Impact Study Applicant acknowledges that no traffic impact study is required as no increase in density or traffic is proposed. Applicant seeks to reduce traffic impact because density will be reduced by one dwelling unit. L. Fire Flow Calculations Applicant acknowledges that no fire flow calculations /water study is required as the applicant seeks to reduce density by one dwelling unit. This will result in reduction in fire flow /water for the parcel. ORIGIIV6Al, REC` VED , JUN 12 200 ?, -.'% PtANNING BEPARIMEN CITY Of CLEARWATER CDB Meeting Date: July 17, 2007 Case Number: FLD2007 -03010 Agenda Item: E. 2. Owners /Applicant: Opti Development, Inca Agent: Mary S. Sullivan Address: 804 - 808 Ewing Avenue CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT GENERAL INFORMATION: REQUEST: Flexible Development approval to reduce the minimum lot size from 5,000 square feet to 4,467 square feet in association with the creation of a new parcel for a detached dwelling (single - family residence) within the Low Medium Density Residential (LMDR) District as a Residential Infill Project, pursuant to Section 2 -204.E of the Community Development Code. ZONING: Low Medium Density Residential (LMDR) FUTURE LAND USE CATEGORY: Residential Urban (RU) PROPERTY USE: Current Use: Detached Dwelling Proposed Use: Detached Dwelling SURROUNDING ZONING North: LMDR Attached and Detached Dwellings AND USES: South: LMDR Attached and Detached Dwellings East: LMDR Attached and Detached Dwellings West: LMDR Attached and Detached Dwellings ANALYSIS: Site Location and Existing Conditions: The 0.26 -acre subject property is located at the northwest corner of Jasmine Way and Ewing Avenue. The subject property has a zoning designation of Low Medium Density Residential (LMDR) with an underlying and compatible future land use designation of Residential Urban (RU). Until recently the subject property consisted of three dwelling units, a single - family detached dwelling located along the southern half of the parcel, and a duplex located on the parcels northern half. However, the duplex was severely damaged in a fire and was demolished in March of this year. The single - family detached' dwelling was undamaged in the fire and is to remain; however the property owner desires to construct a new single - family detached dwelling in place of the demolished duplex. Development Proposal: In order to facilitate this construction, the owner seeks to subdivide the property into two lots with the south lot containing the existing single - family detached dwelling and the north lot to eventually contain a new single - family detached dwelling. Due to the size and configuration of the existing structure on the parcel, the south lot would be approximately 88.28 feet by 86.01 feet in size (7,593 square feet), leaving roughly 88 feet by 50 feet for Community Development Board — July 17, 2007 FLD2007 -03010 — Page 1 the north lot (4,467 square feet). This dimension would result in a nonconforming lot size of 4,467 square feet as per the minimum development standards of the LMDR district. Therefore, the applicant has requested a deviation from the minimum lot area requirement as a Residential Infill Project in order to create the two lots as stated above. The development proposal's compliance with the various development standards of the Community Development Code relative to the development proposal is discussed below. Impervious Surface Ratio (I.S.R.): Pursuant to Section 2 -201.1 of the Community Development Code, the maximum I.S.R. within the RU Future Land Use category is 0.65. As noted above, the south parcel will contain the existing single - family detached dwelling; thus it will have an I.S.R. of approximately 0.17, which meets the above requirement. The north parcel is presently not proposed with any development. As such, I.S.R. requirements will be assessed when a specific development proposal is made. Lot Size: Pursuant to Section 2 -204 of the Community Development Code, within the LMDR District the minimum lot size for a single - family detached dwelling is 5,000 square feet. As proposed, the south lot would total approximately 7,593 square feet, which exceeds the development standard. However, the north lot would total only 4,467 square feet. While the development standards for detached dwellings require a minimum lot size of 5,000 square feet, the Code does allow for this standard to be reduced to 3,000 square feet. However, the applicable Flexibility Criteria [ref. Section 2- 204.B] states that such a deviation is for an existing developed lot or for the development of a vacant lot. In either case, the criterion requires that the lot already exist in order to acquire the deviation. No provision is made for this variation to be applicable to the creation of a new lot. As such, the applicant has made their request as a Residential Infill Project, which does not set forth a specific minimum lot size requirement. The standard by which a deviated lot size is deemed appropriate through the Residential Infill Project application process is through the following criterion: ❑ Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height, off - street parking, access or other development standards are justified by the benefits to community character and the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. The applicant has stated in response to this criterion that "the creation of a new lot will benefit the community character by providing a consistent streetscape facing Ewing Avenue in keeping with the opposing southeast corner, which currently contains four similarly sized lots under 5,000 square feet. These are 903 Ewing Avenue, 1001, 1003 and 1003A Jasmine Way sized at 3,250; 3,599; 2,800; and 3,950 square feet respectfully. Additionally, the proposed lot size is consistent with the character of lots in the community as eight other lots within 500 feet of the proposed lot are smaller than 5,000 square feet. The creation of a new lot will benefit the City of Clearwater as a whole as it promotes housing near mass transit routes, in a pedestrian friendly location, thereby encouraging mass transit use over automobiles. The size of the lot is suitable for workforce or first time buyer housing, which benefits the community by promoting homeownership at entry level price points. Finally, the creation of a new lot will add value to the tax rolls, encourage construction of new housing, which will be maintained and taxed for the City of Clearwater's benefit ". While the proposed lot size is inconsistent with those development standards set forth in the Code as well as being inconsistent with the majority of the existing lots in the area, it is not out of character for the area, and will not be detrimental to the area. The portion of the existing lot proposed to be separated was previously occupied by a duplex, and the creation of a new lot for a single - family detached dwelling will Community Development Board — July 17, 2007 FLD2007 -03010 — Page 2 not increase demand for services in the area to any greater capacity than it was at previously. Staff finds no outright reason why the request to reduce the minimum lot size from 5,000 square feet to 4,467 square feet for the creation of a new parcel for a detached dwelling (single - family residence) cannot be supported. Lot Width: Pursuant to Section 2 -204 of the Community Development Code, within the LMDR District the minimum lot width for a single - family detached dwelling is 50 feet. As proposed, the south lot will have a width of 86 feet and the north lot a width of 50 feet. Thus, compliance with this minimum development standard will be achieved. Minimum Setbacks: Pursuant to Section 2 -202 of the Community Development Code, within the LMDR District the minimum standard development side setback requirement is five feet. As proposed, the existing structure on the south lot would have a setback of 5.9 feet from the newly created property line. There are no changes to the parcel in any other capacity that would impact the other existing setbacks; thus no deviations are necessary. Further, as nothing is presently proposed on the north lot, no setback review or deviation is necessary. Maximum Building Height: Pursuant to Section 2 -202 of the Community Development Code, within the LMDR District the minimum standard development height for a single - family detached dwelling is 30 feet. The existing structure on the south lot is well below the maximum height and no change to this structure is proposed; thus no deviation is necessary. Further, as nothing is presently proposed on the north lot, no building height review or deviation is necessary. Minimum Off - Street Parking: Pursuant to Section 2 -202 of the Community Development Code, within the LMDR District, the minimum off - street parking requirement for a single - family detached dwelling is two parking spaces. The existing dwelling on the south lot has the required two parking spaces, and as nothing is presently proposed on the north lot, no deviations are necessary. Code Enforcement Analysis: There are no outstanding Code Enforcement issues associated with the subject property. COMPLIANCE WITH STANDARDS AND CRITERIA: The following table depicts the consistency of the development proposal with the applicable standards. and criteria as per Sections 2 -201.1 and 2 -204 of the Community Development Code: 1 See above discussion with regard to Lot Size. Community Development Board — July 17, 2007 FLD2007 -03010 — Page 3 Standard Pro osed Consistent Inconsistent North Lot South Lot I.S.R. 0.65 N/A 0.17 X Lot Size 3,000 — 5,000 square feet 4,467 square feet 7,593 square feet X1 (0.102 acres) (0.174 acres) Lot Width 25 — 50 feet 50.63 feet 86.21 feet X Setbacks Front: 15 — 25 feet N/A 22.5 feet (south) N/A N/A 14.4 feet (east) N/A N/A Side: 2 —5 feet N/A 5.9 feet (north) X 41 feet (west) N/A N/A Rear: 5 — 15 feet N/A N/A N/A N/A Building Height 30 feet N/A N/A N/A N/A Off - Street Detached Dwelling: N/A 2 X Parking 2 per unit 1 See above discussion with regard to Lot Size. Community Development Board — July 17, 2007 FLD2007 -03010 — Page 3 COMPLIANCE WITH FLEXIBILITY CRITERIA: The following table depicts the consistency of the development proposal with the Flexibility Criteria as per Section 2 -204.B of the Community Development Code (Detached Dwellings): 1 See above discussion with regard to Lot Size. 2 See the attached Conditions of Approval. The following table depicts the consistency of the development proposal with the Flexibility Criteria as per Section 2 -204.E of the Community Development Code (Residential Infill Project): Consistent Inconsistent 1. Minimum lot size per dwelling of less than 5,000 square feet is an existing lot or a N/A X' lot size of less than 5,000 square feet is necessary to the development or redevelopment of a vacant lot which would otherwise not be economically feasible. 2. Access is provided to each lot by frontage on a public street or by an easement of X N/A access at least 15 feet in width. 3. The volume to lot size ratio of the structures to be developed on the lot is no more X2 than ten percent greater than the average volume to lot size ratio of all existing X structures within 500 feet of the lot. N/A N/A 4. Front setback: a. The existing structures along the same side of the road have been constructed N/A N/A with irregular setbacks and the proposed reduction in front setback will not be out of character with the neighborhood. b. The extent to which existing structures in the neighborhood have been N/A N/A constructed to a regular or uniform setback from the right -of -way. c. The reduction in front setback will not adversely affect adjacent property values. N/A N/A 5. Rear setback: a. The reduction in rear setback will allow for the preservation of existing N/A N/A vegetation which could not otherwise be preserved; b. The reduction in rear setback will allow the development or redevelopment of a N/A N/A substandard structure which would otherwise not be feasible; or c. The reduction results in an efficient house layout. N/A N/A 6. Side setback: The reduction in side setback will allow for the preservation of N/A N/A existing vegetation which could not otherwise be preserved. 1 See above discussion with regard to Lot Size. 2 See the attached Conditions of Approval. The following table depicts the consistency of the development proposal with the Flexibility Criteria as per Section 2 -204.E of the Community Development Code (Residential Infill Project): Community Development Board — July 17, 2007 FLD2007 -03010 — Page 4 Consistent Inconsistent 1. The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development is N/A N/A otherwise impractical without deviations from one or more of the following: intensity or other development standards. 2. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a residential infill N/A N/A project will not materially reduce the fair market value of abutting properties. 3. The uses within the residential infill project are otherwise permitted in the district. X 4. The uses within the residential infill project are compatible with adjacent land uses. X 5. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a residential infill N/A N/A project will upgrade the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. 6. The design of the proposed residential infill project creates a form and function N/A N/A which enhances the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. 7. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height, off - street parking, access X or other development standards are justified by the benefits to community character and the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. Community Development Board — July 17, 2007 FLD2007 -03010 — Page 4 COMPLIANCE WITH GENERAL STANDARDS FOR LEVEL ONE AND LEVEL TWO APPROVALS: The following table depicts the consistency of the development proposal with the General Standards for Level One and Level Two Approvals as per Section 3 -913.A of the Community Development Code: SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION: The Development Review Committee (DRC) reviewed the application and supporting materials at its meeting of May 3, 2007, and deemed the development proposal to be sufficient to move forward to the Community Development Board (CDB), based upon the following findings of fact and conclusions of law: Findings of Fact: 1. That the 0.26 -acre subject property is located at the northwest corner of Ewing Avenue and Jasmine Way, and if subdivided will create a 0.102 -acre (4,467 square foot) north lot and a 0.174 -acre (7,593 square foot) south lot; 2. That the subject property is located within the Low Medium Density Residential (LMDR) District; 3. That the subject property is located within the Residential Urban (RU) Future Land Use Plan category; and 4. That there are no outstanding Code Enforcement issues associated with the subject property. Conclusions of Law: 1. That the development proposal is consistent with the applicable Standards and Criteria as per Sections 2 -201.1 and 2 -204 of the Community Development Code; 2. That the development proposal is inconsistent with the Flexibility criteria as per Section 2- 204.B.1 of the Community Development Code (Detached Dwelling); 3. That the development proposal is consistent with the Flexibility criteria as per Sections 2- 204.B.2 and 3 of the Community Development Code (Detached Dwelling); 4. That the development proposal is consistent with the Flexibility criteria as per Section 2 -204.E of the Community Development Code (Residential Infill Project); and 5. That the development proposal is consistent with the General Standards for Level One and Level Two Approvals as per Section 3 -913.A of the Community Development Code. Based upon the above, the Planning Department recommends APPROVAL of the Flexible Development approval to reduce the minimum lot size from 5,000 square feet to 4,467 square feet in association with the creation of a new parcel for a detached dwelling (single - family residence) within the Low Medium Density Residential (LMDR) District as a Residential Infill Project, pursuant to Section 2 -204.E of the Community Development Code with the following conditions: Community Development Board — July 17, 2007 FLD2007 -03010 — Page 5 Consistent Inconsistent 1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, X coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage development and use of X adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons X residing or working in the neighborhood. 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. X 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the X immediate vicinity. 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including X visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts on adjacent properties. SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION: The Development Review Committee (DRC) reviewed the application and supporting materials at its meeting of May 3, 2007, and deemed the development proposal to be sufficient to move forward to the Community Development Board (CDB), based upon the following findings of fact and conclusions of law: Findings of Fact: 1. That the 0.26 -acre subject property is located at the northwest corner of Ewing Avenue and Jasmine Way, and if subdivided will create a 0.102 -acre (4,467 square foot) north lot and a 0.174 -acre (7,593 square foot) south lot; 2. That the subject property is located within the Low Medium Density Residential (LMDR) District; 3. That the subject property is located within the Residential Urban (RU) Future Land Use Plan category; and 4. That there are no outstanding Code Enforcement issues associated with the subject property. Conclusions of Law: 1. That the development proposal is consistent with the applicable Standards and Criteria as per Sections 2 -201.1 and 2 -204 of the Community Development Code; 2. That the development proposal is inconsistent with the Flexibility criteria as per Section 2- 204.B.1 of the Community Development Code (Detached Dwelling); 3. That the development proposal is consistent with the Flexibility criteria as per Sections 2- 204.B.2 and 3 of the Community Development Code (Detached Dwelling); 4. That the development proposal is consistent with the Flexibility criteria as per Section 2 -204.E of the Community Development Code (Residential Infill Project); and 5. That the development proposal is consistent with the General Standards for Level One and Level Two Approvals as per Section 3 -913.A of the Community Development Code. Based upon the above, the Planning Department recommends APPROVAL of the Flexible Development approval to reduce the minimum lot size from 5,000 square feet to 4,467 square feet in association with the creation of a new parcel for a detached dwelling (single - family residence) within the Low Medium Density Residential (LMDR) District as a Residential Infill Project, pursuant to Section 2 -204.E of the Community Development Code with the following conditions: Community Development Board — July 17, 2007 FLD2007 -03010 — Page 5 Conditions of Approval: 1. That prior to the submittal of a building permit application for the new single- family detached dwelling on the north lot, a Minor Lot Adjustment be approved by the Planning Department; 2. That prior to the submittal for a Minor Lot Adjustment, the existing concrete on the proposed north lot and that concrete on the south lot within five feet of the property line between the north and south lots must be removed; 3. That the newly created north lot is to be exclusively used as a single - family detached dwelling; and 4. That the total square footage of all buildings built on the north lot shall be no more than ten percent greater than the average volume to lot size ratio of all existing buildings within 500 feet of the lot (1,296 square feet). Prepared by Planning Department Staff: Robert G. Tefft, Planner III ATTACHMENTS: ❑ Location Map • Aerial Map • Future Land Use Map ❑ Zoning Map ❑ Existing Surrounding Uses Map ❑ Photographs of Site and Vicinity S: (Planning DepartmenllC D BIFLEX (FLD) (Pending cases)Up for the next CDBIEwing Ave 808 (LMDR) 07 -17 -07 RTEwing Ave 808 -Staff Report 07- 17- 07.doc Community Development Board — July 17, 2007 FLD2007 -03010 — Page 6 Robert G. Tefft 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, Florida 33756 (727) 562 -4539 robert.tefftAmvclearwater.com PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE • Planner III City of Clearwater, Clearwater, Florida June 2005 to Present Duties include performing technical review of and preparation of staff reports for various land development applications, the organization of data and its display in order to track information and provide status reports, and making presentations to various City Boards and Committees. • Planner II City of Clearwater, Clearwater, Florida May 2005 to June 2005 Duties include performing technical review of and preparation of staff reports for various land development applications, the organization of data and its display in order to track information and provide status reports. Senior Planner City of Delray Beach, Delray Beach, Florida October 2003 to May 2005 Performed technical review of and prepared staff reports for land development applications such as, but not limited to: site plans, conditional uses, rezonings, land use amendments, and text amendments. Organized data and its display in order to track information and provide status reports. Make presentations to various City Boards. Planner City of Delray Beach, Delray Beach, Florida March 2001 to October 2003 Performed technical review of and prepared staff reports for land development applications such as, but not limited to: site plans, conditional use and text amendments. Organization of data and its display in order to track information and provide status reports. Provided in -depth training to the Assistant Planner position with respect to essential job functions and continuous guidance. Assistant Planner City of Delray Beach, Delray Beach, Florida October 1999 to March 2001 Performed technical review of and prepared staff reports for site plan development applications. Performed reviews of building permit applications. Provided information on land use applications, ordinances, land development regulations, codes, and related planning programs /services to other professionals and the public. EDUCATION, • Bachelor of Arts, Geography (Urban Studies), University of South Florida, 1999 LICENSES & CERTIFICATES • American Planning Association Community Development Board — July 17, 2007 . FLD2007 -03010 — Page 7 > (D CD F! z 10 N) 10 > 00 0 oo 0 HAULS rn n 0 -n 0 X z 0 z 0 Iz > rn ;D rn INOIA INQKNI, 0 Cn 10 N) 10 C) Q- (D < (D 0 7C) 3 cn o C) C) co co ) (D :3 m rn (]n, CA) :3 > < c :m) 0 AVE .0-1 9 C9 z n > m m 0 >El AVE 11 E Q E WING AVE EV F4 0 " C) a (D a (D (D MART NLUTHER KING JR. p K3 CA) X N :2 z 2 m X 0 0 X z rn r- r- I C) 0 MADI ON �(,n C) 4F MISSOURI AV E S.R. 651 1 • 0 S �iwAll• r y ,, ,� f Iry _ - . d T 4W fir' S DR U RD P6 A t, W,4 'LIF k Q i 4 NI Aerial Map • •. r- - .. - - r 00 Sites: 804, 806 and 808 Ewing Avenue Property - es): 0.273 Atlas Pa •.• 1 1 131 I I606 _ 1 14 1 13 12 11 10 9 30 29 128 27 26 25 24 23 22 21 20 19 18 167 610 z ¢ 1 $ 612 a OCO 611 I PINE ST ^ °� m 1 700 3 4 5 4 2 702 3 I 1 i 14 13 12 11 I 10 1 9708 IOo 0 0 Q I Q 1 m m m m m I III i I 171 6 31410 1 3 4 1 5 1 I6 141 i2to, _I T- 8 17 1 6 1101 112 14 ,6 1 1 I $I t1 1131 151 I I I I�11 JASMINE WAY 11111 ill I X111 1 fi 4 1j111 11 2 11 ( 81 1 6 1 I 1 1 1131I TI '9 1 1711514131 I 1 1- i?7 bI I2 1' r i b4 hS 36 39 11, q I 1 1 I II F I 1 1 I I I I 1111.,11,.1 "111. EP1� 1 1 I I 1$ 1 so 1 16 -ICJ I III 1 1Q 1 ] 1 51 13''1 11 9 15 I6 16 13 I 1 1 W 303 tJ 2 1 1 1 I Q i 111 1 i'Bi0 p,tP2 3I?4 ps 619 P' IT , 133 �d I9il I � 1 I�I IIII II 1�1 1AI I I 1 4 5 6 7 8 I I 9 1 10 11 I I 12 I 13 14 I I 15 1 16 i 1 2 i 3 703 1 11 1 2 1 3 � III 7 24 I I I 8 O 1 O 7 'o � I o 4 I 708 32 I 310 30 29 28 27 26 25 24 23 22 21 20 I 19 1 18 1 170 I I m O D M N cc a a � 01 I 712 714 elrrrn n EP1� 1 1 I I 1$ 1 so 1 16 -ICJ I III 1 1Q 1 ] 1 51 13''1 11 9 15 I6 16 13 I 1 1 W 303 tJ 2 1 1 1 I Q i 111 1 i'Bi0 p,tP2 3I?4 ps 619 P' IT , 133 �d I9il I � 1 I�I IIII II 1�1 1AI I I IN 116 1 I �Io ICI i 17116'5 i 41t3112 rho 1B ] 11 6 800 1 5 II91 1 II f3 III T I I( t 11 1 2 1 3 � III 7 5 a 1 I 2 1 3 i 4 /L ° 6 1 HDR 3483 1.61 A c �' 1e 10 9 V I 90 12 11 903 6 800 1 802 + 2 1 3 4 7 5 ` 7 J v 90 I N 8 O 804 O 7 'o � I o 4 81 5 6 7 8 8 a 1 I 2 1 3 i 4 /L ° 6 1 HDR 3483 1.61 A c �' 1e m ° Zoning Map Owner. Opti Development, Inc. Case: FLD2007 -03010 Sites: 804,806 and 808 Ewing Avenue Property Size Acres : 0.273 Atlas Page: 296A PIN: 15- 29 -15- 59292 -001 -0320 10 9 V I 90 12 11 903 17 18 1s 20 1 904 15 16 ` 7 J v 90 1'4 N 8 O � Q O 7 'o � I o m ° Zoning Map Owner. Opti Development, Inc. Case: FLD2007 -03010 Sites: 804,806 and 808 Ewing Avenue Property Size Acres : 0.273 Atlas Page: 296A PIN: 15- 29 -15- 59292 -001 -0320 I 1 1 31 1 1 6C 1 14 13 12 11 10 9 30 29 1 28 27 26 25 24 23 22 21 20 19 18 17 10 I i 6o1 s, Q 1 $ 6�•11 1 I MM m N N O 1 O ? O O O O O N 'g 3 4 5 414 13 12 11 a 1 W 9 T 171 5 31 1 3 41 5 Its 14I 12 J aq I 1 8 17 i s 1101 112 14 1 ,E 1 81 11 1,31 1151 1 1 I 1 i l JASMINE WAY 111 `°111111 11 1 111 j1 11111 111 1 I 1 _ 1 6'15( 1 4 113 2 '6 111 81 17'6 151413 1 i 1 1 � � I 1 lrt1 I I I 1 1�1 I %n1�i �° �'�i �'6 36P 391 1`1iZ 1111 �! I II 1 "1111 I � PINE ST X11 1 1 1 1 1 al I I I so I el I I 1 I is g 121 1, 8 g 1 7 0 5 13 „ 191 16 13 1' 1 Ill 8031 J 2 1 1 1 I:�b 1 I II I I 6 �0 b2 J2, 1?B� B gI �S �2 1,8 '1 I lso 18 '1 �'I III II Ill � 9 81718 EIR 514 311 1 gp7 p 1 1 , M M-Q 1, M I o g o I S a1 4 5 6 7 8 V 9 1 10 11 I 12 1 13 14 I 15 1 16 i 1 2 3 I 703 1 81 5 24 I I I 701 8 1 708 32 131 30 29 28 27 0 26 25 24 0, 23 22 0 21 20 1 0 01 I 19 18 1 1710 � G I IED (D 1 $ m m rn m� g o , S 1 0 X11 1 1 1 1 1 al I I I so I el I I 1 I is g 121 1, 8 g 1 7 0 5 13 „ 191 16 13 1' 1 Ill 8031 J 2 1 1 1 I:�b 1 I II I I 6 �0 b2 J2, 1?B� B gI �S �2 1,8 '1 I lso 18 '1 �'I III II Ill MAGNOLIA DR 3 h 01 a iJ DRUID RD � 9 81718 EIR 514 311 1 gp7 p 1 II 26 I o 1, 2 3 4 MAGNOLIA DR 3 h 01 a iJ DRUID RD 5p 70 � L-�N 2 I 3 1 V4 /L 5 r 6 I 113,U3 1.61 Ac aIY�Il1 Future land Use Map Owner: Opti Development, Inc. Case: FLD2007 -03010 Sites: 804,806 and 808 Ewing Avenue Property Size Acres : 0.273 Atlas Page: 296A PIN: 15- 29 -15- 59292 -001 -0320 / gp7 p 802 2 3 4 7 804 4 81 5 8 g 8 N 5p 70 � L-�N 2 I 3 1 V4 /L 5 r 6 I 113,U3 1.61 Ac aIY�Il1 Future land Use Map Owner: Opti Development, Inc. Case: FLD2007 -03010 Sites: 804,806 and 808 Ewing Avenue Property Size Acres : 0.273 Atlas Page: 296A PIN: 15- 29 -15- 59292 -001 -0320 I I 1 3, 1 1 14 113 12 11 10 9 30 29 1 28 27 26 25 24 23 22 21 20 19 18 7 1608 1 , I I N I Q I o 1 e z 1 Vp• ,pD bp m O N I a 1 tD O N V• O V• to m !O+ p N 61 1 e a� ap a0 a0 O 611 I �- � � O O 1 2 PINE ST o °' 1 I I 12 171 e 1 1318b' VA 1 1 1 1 3 4 1 5 61 16 141 12$0 1 17161 s13 1 �1 _I 2 Lj 8 1 7 6 101112141 1B 1 AT 1 JASMINE WAY DETACHED 11 11 111 D 11I111111111111111 96 141 1121 170 181 18 41 12 1 1 115 131 111 19 1 17 I51 31 11 I -1- I I C� OIF 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 rF � � 6rI �,�2I J46 1 111 W 11 g $ 5 , 700 7 In 8 1 0 9 1 O TA C ' t2 -'i�3 O 14 Q I 3 4 5 4 2 702 W EL 24 I TA DA a I 70i 32 I 31 30 29 28 27 0 26 1 24 NN ats T kCF ED I p I 14 13 1i E I a I p of am p CD 10 I 970 U) O N O tp O 1 N V 1 p 1 °' 1 I I 12 171 e 1 1318b' VA 1 1 1 1 3 4 1 5 61 16 141 12$0 1 17161 s13 1 �1 _I 2 Lj 8 1 7 6 101112141 1B 1 AT 1 JASMINE WAY DETACHED 11 11 111 D 11I111111111111111 96 141 1121 170 181 18 41 12 1 1 115 131 111 19 1 17 I51 31 11 I -1- I I C� OIF 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 rF � � 6rI �,�2I J46 1 111 W 11 1 01 4 5 6 7 In 8 1 0 9 1 O TA C ' t2 -'i�3 O 14 O 15 I 16 I 2 3 1 703 I 8 ?0 el 1194 I - 23 m D EL 24 I ET C$ED 6 I 70i 32 I 31 30 29 28 27 0 26 25 040 Vsi 24 NN ats 23 E 24 0 ° 21 20p I .- °I I 708 9 118 1 �1 1 1 712 I 1 714 1 1 n1 1 V Q W p of am p CD O N O tp O I N V 1 p 1 °' 1 I I 12 171 e 1 1318b' VA 1 1 1 1 3 4 1 5 61 16 141 12$0 1 17161 s13 1 �1 _I 2 Lj 8 1 7 6 101112141 1B 1 AT 1 JASMINE WAY DETACHED 11 11 111 D 11I111111111111111 96 141 1121 170 181 18 41 12 1 1 115 131 111 19 1 17 I51 31 11 I -1- I I C� OIF 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 rF � � 6rI �,�2I J46 1 111 W 11 1 I I$ I I$ 1 P �I 1 61 171 115 4 112 113 1101 8 16 11 19 17 14 5 1 12 3 1 I1 ICI I � I 11 4 26 I �5I I I I 01 (1 I 11 N PIS 8 ?0 el 1194 I - 23 m D EL IN S W MAGNOLIA DR ,6 h DRUID RD O 01 O O ©F 1'' 11�,8ii2 1 r12 A I 1% 18 DiTACHED 19 204 I Soo 4 81 D EL IN S W 5 6 7 8 g 3 C N O V O 11 O 1 O O p 2 mm 1 � 2 1 3 1 4 5 I 6 I 45 0 I ^� 45 Existing Surrounding Uses Map Owner: Opti Development, Inc. Case: FLD2007 -03010 Sites: 804,806 and 808 Ewing Avenue Property Size Acres : 0.273 Atlas Page: 296A PIN: 15- 29 -15- 59292 - 001 -0320 901 3403 1.61 Ac 9 1 r12 A I 1% 18 0 1 19 204 I 13N \ 14 W 1L Q 2 (DI C 40 C� CO 0 mm 1 � 2 1 3 1 4 5 I 6 I 45 0 I ^� 45 Existing Surrounding Uses Map Owner: Opti Development, Inc. Case: FLD2007 -03010 Sites: 804,806 and 808 Ewing Avenue Property Size Acres : 0.273 Atlas Page: 296A PIN: 15- 29 -15- 59292 - 001 -0320 901 3403 1.61 Ac 0 0 Looking southwest from Ewing Avenue toward existing building lot across the street from Ewing Avenue toward property Looking west from Ewing Avenue toward existing building the west Looking northwest from Ewing Avenue toward property across the street 804 -808 Ewing Avenue FLD2007 -03010 /Sut xL *t7,. 1wk, owm d Slllu 114 Ai �co �o� �CU�in� Qi�P�.a,�� D� ;t�.� �,a�cde ��,�,��'a,, �Ja�, ��d �d -,-�_ ate. t" 4tae av-A� awA�� /goo 1i� � �a �,�O 160 J� 6 Y�15 1 005 goo/ �i l5 , ,, l�rw,a` 7y;�5 CJ 5g0O x'505 70,335 toot i U T � I El D El n 0 11 $08 W 9ra Y R 915., 913 dog J,XPUL 0, ev-,?v�ld O Caul -4 2 4t&a"f-- Q J,XPUL 0, ev-,?v�ld O Caul -4 2 4t&a"f-- (3-) Cep dw�vzLa >✓c nrA'a, /).�c°�RE;:.�ckn� ,✓r�, �t,� a -uii, � C��1�iu�.dz'z<. .�+,�,s� �1e�.- /rrw,/�✓n6 ,Grrt�9vY<`m�<x.�o G"+�- O ,/�anJ'�✓CenG�'. fN�G2¢.��'n,�c /hec ��eGL -L�.�e �e� QAeu� ,C�Fc6.uK� 01 y.'h';' inw'9. ;opacu2ca; ..! c YIG :cat (J� w� c2d�L i`� &tdt&-� tz %� ,u� iut fig u�,ce LU UJ F� O goO L ir. P J J �C I 04 3 July 9, 2007 City of Clearwater K Clearwater Development Board C'4 1S IM Attn: Robert Tefft r`- VJ j Dear Mr. Tefft, z� As a resident within 500 feet of 808 Ewing Ave, l request that the variance proposal for the subdivision of 804 -808 Ewing Ave, parcel # 15/29/15/59292/001 /0320, not be approved. The main reasons are outlined as follows: 1) Safety, A new property too closely situated to other existing properties will only increase the risk of a fire potentially jumping to the other structures. 2) Property Values. A house built into an extremely small lot will only devalue the existing surrounding properties, and hence future tax revenue for the city. 3) Quality of neighborhood. The neighborhood will not be benefited by lowering the existing standards. The proposed lot would be over 500 sq ft smaller than the minimum permitted. The existing lot is well spaced and has curb appeal. Name: i Address: 'Z7 a-Sr�.�r.A svv o--I . OL V 10012 Tasrnwr.e fit) �_ 1, t� 1 z P 3 July 9, 2007 City of Clearwater , Clearwater Development Board. o Qc Attn: Robert Tefft N 1 Dear Mr. Tefft, 4� �� As a resident within 500 feet of 808 Ewing Ave, I request that the variance proposal for the subdivision of 804 -808 Ewing_Ave, parcel. # 15/29/15/59292/001 /0320, not be . Q- approved. The main reasons are outlined as follows: 1) Safety. A new property too closely situated to other existing properties will only increase the risk of a fire potentially jumping to the other structures. 2) Property Values. A house built into an extremely small lot will only devalue the existing surrounding properties, and hence future tax revenue for the city. 3) Quality of neighborhood. The neighborhood will not be benefited by lowering the existing standards. The proposed lot would be over 500 sq ft smaller than the minimum permitted. The existing lot is well spaced and has curb appeal. Address: i (o5 TA6m, tj,- IAJAY 1001 -S(ASVk-'M July 9, 2007 City of Clearwater r- w us Clearwater Development Board Attn: Robert Tefft r- U., Dear Mr. Tefft, 0 W. As a resident within 500 feet.of 808 Ewing Ave, i request that the variance proposal for the subdivision of 804 -808 Ewing Ave, parcel # 15/29/15/59292/001 /0320, not be approved. The main reasons are outlined as follows: 1) Safety. A new property too closely situated to other existing properties will only increase the risk of afire potentially jumping to the other structures. 2) Property Values. A house built into an extremely small lot will only devalue the existing surrounding properties, and hence future tax revenue for the city. 3) Quality of neighborhood. The neighborhood will not be benefited by lowering the existing standards. The proposed lot would be over 500 sq ft smaller than the minimum permitted. The existing lot is well spaced and has curb appeal. N Address: �•' l/� ci U-* �n' Yt J l00 0 J-0- 5 r►-t i (I �`J WI A)00 74 -sSmin e- W'1a - July 9, 2007 City of Clearwater Community Development Attn. Neil Thompson Dear Mr. Taft, REcE1vw JUL 0 9 2001 �'�NNING DEPl�►t1ENT C1TYpFCIE AUTEI� I am writing to you in regards to the variance request for 804 -808 Ewing Ave, parcel # 15/29/15/59292/001 /0320. This variance requests for the separating the lot and allowing a second property be built upon the separated lot. The city should not approve this variance request. As an existing property owner adjacent to the above mentioned parcel, I have some strong concerns that I think the city should consider when making their decision. What value does this bring to the existing neighborhood and Clearwater? The second lot is already too small to build upon, hence the variance request. So then, what exceptional gain is to be made to the community by making an exception in this case? I don't think a substandard size house wedged into a sandbox sized lot is what Clearwater is envisioning for the future of our city. If this variance is approved, the surrounding homes and neighborhood will only be devalued and not benefited by an. additional `new house'. From a financial perspective for the city, it is true there will be quick gain of another taxable property. However, at what cost? Lowering the community standard? In the big picture, this initial gain will only be outweighed by the longer term tax devaluation to the surrounding properties and neighborhood in general. It doesn't add up. With these points in mind, it is clear that the city should not approve this variance request. The city established these guidelines for a good reason, quality of neighborhood and life. Please do not allow these two qualities to be reduced for a variance that does not contribute to them. Respectfully, Jeff Souers 912 Jasmine Way II Tefft, Robert From: JSOUERS @tampabay.rr.com Sent: Monday, June 25, 2007 9:55 PM To: Tefft, Robert Subject: 808 Ewing June 23, 2007 City of Clearwater Attn. Robert Taft Dear Mr. Taft, Pagel of 2 I am writing to you in regards to the variance request for 808 Ewing Ave, parcel # 15/29/15/59292/001 /0320. This variance requests for the separating the lot and allowing a second property be built upon the separated lot. The city should not approve this variance request. As an existing property owner adjacent to the above mentioned parcel, I have some strong concerns that I think the city should consider when making their decision. What value does this bring to the existing neighborhood and Clearwater? The second lot is already too small to build upon, hence the variance request. So then, what exceptional gain is to be made to the community by making an exception in this case? I don't think a. substandard size house wedged into a sandbox sized lot is what Clearwater is envisioning for the future of our city. If this variance is approved, the surrounding homes and neighborhood will only be devalued and not benefited by an additional `new house'. From a financial perspective, lowering the standard for a quick gain of another taxable property will only be outweighed by the long term tax devaluation to the surrounding properties and neighborhood in general. It doesn't add up. With these points in mind, it is clear that the city should not approve this variance request. The city established these guidelines for a good reason, quality of neighborhood and life. Please do not allow these two qualities to be reduced for a variance that does not contribute to them. Respectfully, Jeff Souers 6/26/2007 .e 803 PROSPECT TRUST 411 CLEVELAND ST # 182 CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 4004 BANCROFT, GEORGE V BANCROFT, MAXIMIANA 1007 MAGNOLIA DR CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 4035 BIANCHINI, JOSEPH D BIANCHINI, MARISA 1004 DRUID RD CLEARWATER FL 33756 - BROWN, GREGORY W 14121 SULLIVAN ST SPRING HILL FL 34609 - BYRD, RICHARD E BYRD, DONNA L 10528 1/2 HILLHAVEN AVE TUJUNGA CA 91042 - 1543 CLEARWATER LAND LTD 17480 DALLAS PKWY STE 1 DALLAS TX 75287 - 7337 CONRAD, LESLIE A PARKER, ANDREW D III 908 JASMINE WAY CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 4016 DESAI, VARSHA S THE DESAI, SUKETU K THE 7593 ARALIA WAY LARGO FL 33777 - 4910 DRUID OAKS PROPERTIES LLC 800 INDIAN SPRING RD NOVATO CA 94947 - 4204 NLCALDE, MANUEL W /ALLEN, CHARLES RR ALCALDE, DONNA 802 S PROSPECT AVE 1530 ELMWOOD ST CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 4038 CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 5403 BECKETT, TIMOTHY 1002 JASMINE WAY CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 401.8 BICKERSTAFFE, ROBERT D BICKERSTAFFE, BARBARA B 1007 DRUID RD CLEARWATER FL 33756 - BUCKLEW, KRISTINA L 360 WOODLAWN AVE BELLEAIR FL 33756 - 2041 CARPENTER, MARY S CRAIN, JOSEPHINE A 907 PINE ST CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5621 CLEARWATER MM INVESTMENT CO 12813 WILD ACRES RD LARGO FL 33773 -1517 CORREA, MARILYN S 906 S MARTIN L KING AVE CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 4048 DIOCESE OF ST PETERSBURG PO BOX 40200 ST PETERSBURG FL 33743 - 0200 EICHENLAUB, ERNESTYNA E 1001 PINE ST CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5623 BEHM, RAY G JR BEHM, MARY A 807 S PROSPECT AVE CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 4037 BILELLO, ENZA V 308 MIDLAND AVE GARFIELD NJ 07026 - 1717 BUTE, WAYNE 1006 JASMINE WAY CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 4018 CLARIDA, WILLIAM 1703 JOSHUA CT PALM HARBOR FL 34683 - 4735 CLEARWATER NEIGHBORHOODS COALITION JOE EVICH, PRESIDENT P.O. BOX 8204 CLEARWATER, FL 33758 DAKAN, DEREK DAKAN, BUFFY 1010 MAGNOLIA DR # B CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 4079 DIRTY NELLIE'S REAL ESTATE COR 809 DRUID RD E CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5601 EICHTEN, TERRENCE M EICHTEN, ANGELA R 705 PROSPECT AVE S CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5629 FAVINGER, MICHAEL A FOAT, ELLA E EST FOREMAN, ROBERT L JR FAVINGER, LISA H 1006 JASMINE WAY FOREMAN, PATRICIA A 1005 JASMINE WAY CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 4018 904 S MARTIN L KING AVE CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 4017 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 4048 (. 4 1 FRANCE, JOHN V GARCIA, PEDRO J JR UARCIA, PEDRO J FRANCE, ELIZABETH A 1007 JASMINE WAY GARCIA, GENOVEVA V 1629 CLEVELAND ST 907 JASMINE WAY CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 6102 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 401 7 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 4015 GERUM, MARY E GIBBS, AMY M GODWIN, WINIFRED L N 11404 DEREG RD STRINGFIELD, CHRISTOPHER J 1009 PINE ST TOMAHAWK WI 54487 - 9706 905 DRUID RD E CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5623 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5603 GOODMAN, SHERRY A GOUDY, DAVID JR GOVAN, DENIS D 420 LOTUS PATH 13308 THOUROUGHBRED LOOP 807 MAGNOLIA DR CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3832 LARGO FL 33773 - 1671 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 4031 GRAY, WILLIAM L THE HARBOR OAKS NEIGHBORHOOD GRAY, JANET C THE ASSOCIATION BOB FRITZ, , EL 903 DR UID D R RD E 1951 EDGEWATER DR PRESIDENT 903 DRD CLEARWATER FL 33755. - 1417. 320 MAGNOLIA DRIVE CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5603 CLEARWATER, FL 33756 HIDDEN OAKS APT INC HUBLER, THOMAS A HUTCHESON, DAVID D 1910 LAGO VISTA BLVD 8200 TR 561 HUTCHESON, WILLIAM C JR FOUNTAIN SO. PALM HARBOR FL 34685 - 3332 HOLMESVILLE OH 44633 - 11 11 FOUNTAIN IR FL 33756 - 1451 HUTCHESON, DAVID D HUTCHESON, WILLIAM C JR HUTCHESON, WILLIAM C JR HUTCHESON, DAVID D F I LLC 1 PO BOX 183 252 PINE RD 1011 2 DRUID RD E CLEARWATER FL 33757 - 0183 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 1017 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5606 JONES, ROBERT L KALIS, JAMES KINDER, ERNESTINE R JONES, BETTY J 1004 E JASMINE WAY 704 S PROSPECT AVE 2946 GULF TO BAY BLVD # 66 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 4018 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5630 CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 4222 LASHLEY, CELESTE W LEAP E BRAVO LLC LEONARD, LE CLAIR K 908 DRUID RD E 1428 LEMON ST 708 S PROSPECT AVE CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5604 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 2341 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5630 LEONARD, LECLAIR LICCIARDI, SAMUEL A JR LITTLE E BRAVO LLC 708 S PROSPECT AVE 215 N JEFFERSON AVE 1428 LEMON ST CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5630 CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 4719 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 2341 LUCAS, CLIFFORD L LUCAS, CLIFFORD L LUKE, RALPH LUCAS, ARLINE LUCAS, ARLINE LUKE, RACHEL 1011 PINE ST 915 JASMINE WAY 811 DRUID RD E CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5623 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 4015 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5601 LYLES- SANZO, TRICIA MACIAG, RAFAL MADDEN, JENNIFER A PORTER, KAREN S 2307 NASH ST 909 MAGNOLIA DR 1015 JASMINE WAY CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 4226 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 4033 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 4017 MAHANY, BRIAN 904 JASMINE WAY CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 4016 MC BRIDE, MATTHEW 0 MC BRIDE, DEBRA A 1000 JASMINE WAY CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 4018 MICHAELS, SHARON R 1002 EWING AVE CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 4010 NASH, CLAYTON E 906 DRUID RD E CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5604 PERDOMO, OVIDIO 1002 MAGNOLIA DR CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 4036 PERSECHINO, FRANK 902 S MARTIN LUTHER KING AVE CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 4048 ROGERS, SCOTT I ROGERS, MARIAN M 15 FOUNTAIN SQ BELLEAIR FL 33756 - 1451 SPRADLING, MARY B 912 DRUID RD E CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5604 MAROLDA, JOANN S 913 E PINE ST CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5621 MC CAFFREY, MERCEDES M 805 S PROSPECT.AVE CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 4037 MORITZ- SCOTT, MARY L 97 MINEOLA DR E LARGO FL 33770 - 1907 OBERG, RALPH D 1009 DRUID RD CLEARWATER FL 33756 - PERDUE, TROY PERDUE, JODI 904 DRUID RD E CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5604 POLK, GAIL A 904 E MAGNOLIA DR CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 4034 SAFETY HARBOR CENTRE INC 685 MAIN ST #A SAFETY HARBOR FL 34695 - 3562 SUITERS, DONALD M SUITERS, MARIA R 1005 MAGNOLIA DR CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 4035 MARY S. SULLIVAN 200 BEACH DRIVE NE, #12 ST. PETERSBURG, FL 33701 MC NEIL, GRACE 913 JASMINE WAY CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 4015 MOURA, ANTHONY A 906 JASMINE WAY CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 4016 PECORARO, CARMINE J JR 444 N PAULA DR DUNEDIN FL 34698 -1825 PERKINS, EDGAR M PERKINS, JEANNINE F 1006 MAGNOLIA DR CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 4036 RAVIN, SHELDON J RAVIN, ALAINE 133 MIRAMAR DR COLORADO SPGS CO 80906 - 3723 SOUERS, JEFFERY 912 JASMINE WAY CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 4049 SULLIVAN, REGINALD E SULLIVAN, URSULA B 2952 ADRIAN AVE LARGO FL 33774 - 1404 TAYLOR, MARGARET TEPETATE, TOMAS P TILLEY, JASON L 1005 PINE ST 905 JASMINE WAY TILLEY, CELIA J CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5623 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 4015 912 MAGNOLIA DR CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 4034 1 . TRUST NO 909 -911 PO BOX 186 LAKE WALES FL 33859 - 0186 WILLIAMS, JUSTIN M 1252 ELRIDGE ST CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 4311 WIRTH, RALPH E 909 JASMINE WAY CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 4015 WOODY, NATHAN L WOODY, JOAN E 800 S MARTIN L KING AVE CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 4046 ZEVETCHIN, KATHERINE A 808 EWING AVE CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 4006 VVALTER- DEPERLET, PETER WALTER - DEPERLET, SUZANNE 1824 SW GREENWAY CIR WEST LINN OR 97068 - 9747 WILLIAMS, REBECCA J WILLIAMS, GERALD 910 1/2 DRUID RD E CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5604 WONG, HARRY K WONG, SAFARI V 90 IROQUOIS TRL PORTOLA VALLEY CA 94028 - 7607 WRIGHT, TONY A WRIGHT, JUDY 1004 MAGNOLIA DR CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 4036 vvELLER, HERBERT L JR WELLER, JACQUELINE 915 PINE STE CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5621 WILLIAMS, ROBERT M III 5020 COUNTY ROAD 316A BUSHNELL FL 33513 - 8122 WOODWARD, STEWART G 1005 DRUID RD E CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5605 YOKOYAMA, DALE A THE 97 VELMA DR W LARGO FL 33770 - 2109 i,.tu - .. CITY OF CLEARWATER NOTICE OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD PUBLIC HEARINGS The Community Development Board of the City of Clearwater, Florida, will hold public hearings on Tuesday, July 17, 2007, beginning at 1:00 PM, in the City Council Chambers, in City Hall, 3rd floor, 112 South Osceola Ave, Clearwater, Florida, to consider the following requests: NOTE: All persons wishing to address an item need to be present at the BEGINNING of the meeting. Those cases that are not contested by the applicant, staff, neighboring property owners, etc. will be placed on a consent agenda and approved by a single vote at the beginning of the meeting. 1. Skiff Point of Clearwater, LLC.( Ryan Oliver, Delta Seven Inc) are requesting Flexible Development approval to permit a 15 -slip, 1,666 sq -ft. multi -use dock in conjunction with a 15- unit attached dwelling (condominium) development, under the provisions of Sec 3- 601.C.2. [Proposed Use: Multi -use dock of 1,666 sq. ft for 15 slips, in conjunction with a 15 -unit attached dwelling (condominium)] at 200 -201 Skiff Point, Island Estates of Clearwater Unit 5 -A Lots 35- 36. Assigned Planner: Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Planner III. FLD2007 -05017 2. Opti Development, Inc (Mary S. Sullivan) are requesting Flexible Development approval to reduce the minimum lot size from 5,000 sq. ft. to 4,467 sq. ft in association with the creation of a new parcel for a detached dwelling (single - family residence) within the Low Medium Density Residential (LMDR) District as a Residential Infill Project, pursuant to Sec 2 -204.E of the Community Development Code. (Proposed Use: Detached Dwelling) at 804 -808 Ewing Ave, Mount Orange Revised Blk A, E 5Ft of Lot 30 & All of Lots 31 -34. Assigned Planner: obert' . efft, Plann iI. FLD2007 -03010 3. Housh Ghovaee (Doreen Williams, Northside Engineering Services, Inc.) are requesting Flexible Development approval to permit offices in the Commercial District with a reduction to the front (east along South Belcher Road) setback from 25 ft to zero ft (to existing pavement), reductions to the front (north along Rainbow Drive) setback from 25 ft to two ft (to existing pavement) and to 11 ft (to proposed pavement), reductions to the side (south) setback from 10 ft to seven ft (to existing building) and to zero ft (to existing pavement and proposed dumpster enclosure), a reduction to required parking from 32 spaces to 28 spaces and a deviation to required stacking spaces at the driveways on Rainbow Dr., as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Sec. 2- 704.C, and a reduction to the perimeter buffer (east) along South Belcher Rd. from 15 ft to zero ft (to existing pavement), a reduction to the perimeter buffer (north) along Rainbow Dr from 10 ft to two ft (to existing pavement), a reduction to the perimeter buffer along the south property line. from five ft to zero ft (to existing pavement), a reduction to foundation landscaping from five ft to four ft wide, as a Comprehensive Landscape Program, under the provisions of Sec. 3- 1202.G.(Proposed Use: Offices of 8,000 sq. ft) at 300 S. Belcher Rd., Short & Short Sub Lot 1. Assigned Planner: Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Planner III. FLD2007 -05014 4. City of Clearwater (E. D. Armstrong III, Esq., Johnson, Pope, Bokor, Ruppel & Burns, LLP) is requesting Flexible Development approval to permit in the submerged lands adjacent to the Clearwater Beach Recreation Center a 42 -slip marina dock in conjunction with the Sandpearl Resort project (39 wet slips and three day slips, of which 15 slips will be for public usage and 27 slips will be leased to the Sandpearl Resort) of 11,343 sq. ft with a deviation to allow the docks and tie poles to exceed the 25 percent of the width of the waterway and a reduction to required parking from 24 to zero spaces, under the provisions of Sec 2- 1502.A, 3- 601.C.3 and 3 -603. (Proposed Use: Docks of 39 wet slips and three day slips, of which 15 slips will be for public usage and 27 slips will be leased to the Sandpearl Resort) at 69 Bay Esplanade, Beg At NW Cor Lot 9 Yacht Basin Sub Run N'LY Along E R/W Mandalay Ave 400 Ft (S) Th ELY Along S R/W. Assigned Planner: Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Planner III. FLD2007 -02003 5. TMJ of Pinellas County, Inc (Keith E. Zayac, P.E., RLA) is requesting Flexible Development approval to permit vehicle sales /display in the Commercial District with reductions to the front (east) setback from 25 ft to 15 ft (to pavement) and from 25 ft to 13.7 ft (to existing building), a reduction to the side (south) setback from 10 ft to 3.9 ft (to pavement), a reduction to the rear (west) setback from 20 ft to 3.5 ft (to pavement and existing building), a reduction to required parking from 35 spaces to 10 spaces, a deviation to allow vehicle sales /display contiguous to residentially -zoned property, a deviation to allow the display of vehicles for sale outdoors and a deviation to allow direct access to a major arterial street, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Sec 2- 704.C, and a reduction to the landscape buffer width along S Missouri Ave from 15 ft to 13.7 ft (to existing building), a reduction to the landscape buffer width along the south property line from five ft to 19 ft (to pavement), a reduction to the landscape buffer width along the west property line adjacent to single family dwellings from 12 ft to 5.9 ft (to pavement), a reduction to the landscape buffer width along the west property line adjacent to a nonresidential use from five ft to 3.5 ft (to pavement and existing building) and a reduction to the foundation landscaping adjacent to buildings from five ft to zero ft, as a Comprehensive Landscape Program, under the provisions of Sec. 3- 1202.G. (Proposed Use: Vehicle sales /display) at 1460 -1480 S. Missouri Ave., Duncan's A.H. Resub Part of Lots 11 -13 & Zephyr Hills Sub Lots 7 -10. Assigned Planner: Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Planner IJI. FLD2007 -02006 6. Peter Pan Developments, LLC, Petrit Meroli, Panaviotis Vasiloudes, Epic Holdings South, LLC, and Somerset Place, Inc. (Sherry Bagley and/or Bill Woods, Woods Consulting) are requesting Flexible Development approval to construct a 4,062 sq. ft multi -use dock facility to provide 16 slips as an amenity to a proposed 16 unit attached dwelling (two buildings with eight dwelling units in each) in the Tourist (T) District with an increase to the length of the southern dock from 75 percent of the lot width (93.75 ft) to 111 percent of the lot width (139 ft) under the provisions of Sec. 3- 601.C.3. [Proposed Use: Multi -use dock of 4,062 square feet for 16 slips, in conjunction with a 16 =unit attached dwelling (condominium)] at 685, 689, 693 and 699 Bay Esplanade, Mandalay Unit No.S Replat Blk 76 & 77, Lots 12 &13 & part of Lot 11. Assigned Planner: A. Scott Kurleman, Planner II. FLD2007- 03007 7 Nation Land Trust (Lenore Jacobs) is requesting to delete a condition of approval ( #5 on Development Order of June 20, 2003) requiring all signage to meet Code and be architecturally integrated into the design of the site and/or buildings, to implement Modification of Settlement Stipulation between City of Clearwater and Clear Channel Outdoor, Inc. in Case No. 93- 174 -CI- 21. (Proposed Use: vehicle sales and display in association with an existing auto sales use) at 19246 US Highway 19 N, N 70ft of S 610ft of W 275ft of E 375ft of NEI /4 . Assigned Planner: Gina L. Clayton, Assistant Planning Director. FLD2003 -04020 Interested parties may appear and be heard at the hearing or file written notice of approval or objection with the Planning Director or City Clerk prior to the hearing. Any person who decides to appeal any decision made by the Board or Council, with respect to any matter considered at such hearings, will need to request a record of the proceedings and, for such purpose, may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based per Florida Statute 286.0105. Community Development Code Sec 4 -206 states that party status shall be granted by the Board in quasi-judicial cases if the person requesting such status demonstrates that s /he is substantially affected. Party status entitles parties to personally testify, present evidence, argument and witnesses, cross - examine witnesses, appeal the decision and speak on reconsideration requests, and needs to be requested and obtained during the case discussion before the CDB. An oath will be administered swearing in all persons giving testimony in quasi-judicial public hearing cases. If you wish to speak at the meeting, please wait to be recognized, then state and spell your name and provide your address. Persons without party status speaking before the CDB shall be limited to three minutes unless an individual is representing a group in which case the Chairperson may authorize a reasonable amount of time up to 10 minutes. Five days prior to the meeting, staff reports and recommendations on the above requests will be available for review by interested parties between the hours of 8:30 a.m. and 4:30 p.m., weekdays, at the City of Clearwater, Planning Department, 100 S. Myrtle Ave., Clearwater, FL 33756. Please contact the case presenter, at 562 -4567 to discuss any questions or concerns about the project and/or to better understand the proposal and review the site plan. Michael Delk Cynthia E. Goudeau, MMC Planning Director City Clerk City of Clearwater P.O. Box 4748, Clearwater, FL 33758 -4748 NOTE: Applicant or representative must be present at the hearing. A COPY OF THIS AD IN LARGE PRINT IS AVAILABLE IN OFFICIAL RECORDS AND LEGISLATIVE SERVICES. ANY PERSON WITH A DISABILITY REOUIRING REASONABLE ACCOMMODATION IN ORDER TO PARTICIPATE IN THIS MEETING SHOULD CALL (727) 562 -4093 WITH THEIR REQUEST. Ad: 07/05/07 Property Appraiser General Information: 15/29/15/59292/001/0320 Card I Interactive Map of this Comparable-Sales Back to Query New Tax Collector pq,rcel Listing Results Search Information Page I of 4 Ouestion/Comment about this page 15/29/15/59292/001/0320 Building 2of 2 Building I Data Current as of April 01, 2007 [8:40 am Tuesday April 3] Residential Property Owner, Address, and Sales Print Single Family Property Use: 220 Living Units: I MOUNT ORANGE REVISED BLK A, E 5FT OF LOT 30 & ALL OF LOTS 31,32,33 AND 34 2006 Exemptions Homestead: No Use: 46% Ownership: 100% Tax Exempt: 0% Government: No Institutional: No Agricultural: $0 Historic: $0 2006 Value Save-Our-Homes Can 2006 Tax Information Comparable Sales value based on sales from Tax District: CW 2004-2005: $213,600 Millage: 21.7640 Just/Market Value: $184,400 Special Tax: $.00 Assessed Value/ SOH Cap: $141,909 Taxes: $2,544.41 History Taxable Value: $116,909 Taxes without Save-Our-Homes cap: $3,469 . .18 A significant taxable value increase may Taxes without any exemptions: $4,013.28 occur when sold. Click here for details. Owner/Mailing Property Address Sale Date Book/Page Price _Qou V / I Address 8/2006 15333/1250 $170,000 Q I OPTI DEVELOPMENT 12/2000 11141/2370 $89,900 Q I INC 3348 TYRONE BLVD 808 EWING AVE 8/1985 6061/1466 $70,000 Q I ST PETERSBURG FL 11/1982 5429/1442 $55,000 Q I 33710-2340 Parcel Information Plat Year Plat Book/Page(s) Book/Page: Land Use: Multi-Family - 1924 006/046 15333/1250 Less ... (08) Census Tract: Evacuation Zone: NON- 259.02 EVAC http://www.pcpao.org/general—radet.php?pn--1529155929200103201 4/3/2007 Property Appraiser General Information: 15/29/15/59292/001 /0320 Card 1 Page 2 of 4 Land Information Seawall: No Frontage: None View: Land Use Land Size Unit Value Units Method Multi- Family - Less than 10 units(08) 85 x 135 1,625.00 85.00 F Structural Elements Foundation: Continuous Wall Floor System: Slab on Grade Exterior Wall: Concrete Block Roof Frame: Flat -Shed Roof Cover: Composite - Shingle 1 Story Floor Finish: Carpet/Vinyl /Asphalt/Soft Wood/Terazzo Interior Finish: Drywall /Plaster Fixtures: 3 Quality: Fair Year Built: 1954 Effective Age: 30 Heating: Unit/Space/Wall /Floor Furnace Cooling: None Other Depreciation: 0 Functional Depreciation: 0 Economic Depreciation: 0 Open plot in New Window View Floor: 1 Help http: / /www.pcpao.org /general _ radet.php ?pn = 1529155929200103201 4/3/2007 Property Appraiser General Information: 15/29/15/59292/001 /0320 Card 1 Sub Area Information Page 3 of 4 Description :Living Area Ft2 Gross Area Ft2 Factor Effective Ft2 Base Area 906 906 1.00 906 Utility Room Finished 154 .35 54 Carport Unfinished 264 .15 40 Total Living SF: 906 Total Gross SF: 1,324 Total Effective SF: 1,000 Residential Extra Features Description Dimensions Value /Unit Units Total NewValue Depreciated Value Year Patio /Deck 12X9 $6.00 108 $650.00 $260.00 1959 http: / /www.pcpao.org /general _ radet.php ?pn = 1529155929200103201 4/3/2007 Property Appraiser General Information: 15/29/15/59292/001 /0320 Card 2 Interactive Ma of this Comparable Sales Back to Query New Tax Collector ap reel Listing Results Search Information Page 1 of 4 Question /Comment._ about this uaee 15/29/15/59292/001 /0320 «Building 1 Building 2 Data Current as of April 01, 2007 Qt [8:49 am Tuesday April 3] Residential Property Owner, Address, and Sales Print k Duplex/Triplex Property Use: 220 Living Units: 2 -- MOUNT ORANGE REVISED BLK A, E 5FT OF LOT 30 & ALL OF LOTS 31,32,33 AND 34 2006 Exemptions Homestead: No Use: 46% Ownership: 100% Tax Exempt: 0% Government: No Institutional: No Agricultural: $0 Historic: $0 2006 Value Save - Our -Homes Cab 2006 Tax Information Comparable Sales value based on sales from Tax District: CW 2004 -2005: $213,600 Millage: 21.7640 Just /Market Value: $184,400 Special Tax: $.00 Assessed Value/ SOH Cap: $141,909 Taxes: $2,544.41 History Taxable Value: $116,909 Taxes without Save - Our -Homes cap: $3,469.18 A significant taxable value increase may Taxes without any exemptions: $4,013.28 occur when sold. Click here for details. Owner/Mailing Property Address Sale Date Book/Page Price Q/U V/I Address 8/2006 15333/1250 $170,000 Q I OPTI DEVELOPMENT 12/2000 11141/2370 $89,900 Q I INC 3348 TYRONE BLVD 808 EWING AVE 8/1985 6061/1466 $70,000 Q I ST PETERSBURG FL 11/1982 5429/1442 $55,000 Q I 33710 -2340 Parcel Information Plat Year Plat Book/Page(s) Book/Page: Land Use: Multi - Family - 1924 006/046 15333//250 Less... (08)- Census Tract: Evacuation Zone: NON - 259.02 EVAC http: / /www.pcpao.org /general _ radet.php ?pn = 15291559292001032002 4/3/2007 Property Appraiser General Information: 15/29/15/59292/001 /0320 Card 2 Page 2 of 4 Land Information Seawall: No Frontage: None View: Land Use Land Size Unit Value Units Method Multi - Family - Less than 10 units(08) 85 x 135 1,625.00 85.00 F Structural Elements Foundation: Continuous Wall Floor System: Slab on Grade Exterior Wall: Frame /Siding Roof Frame: Gable -Hip Roof Cover: Composite - Shingle 2 Stories Floor Finish: Carpet/Vinyl /Asphalt/Soft Wood/Terazzo Interior Finish: Drywall /Plaster Fixtures: 6 Quality: Fair Year Built: 1926 Effective Age: 40 Heating: Unit/Space/Wall /Floor Furnace Cooling: None Other Depreciation: 0 Functional Depreciation: 0 Economic Depreciation: 0 Open plot in New Window View Floor: 1 2 Help http: / /www.pcpao.org /general _ radet.php ?pn = 15291559292001032002 4/3/2007 Property Appraiser General Information: 15/29/15/59292/001 /0320' Card 2 Page 3 of 4 http: / /www.pcpao.org /general _ radet.php ?pn = 15291559292001032002 4/3/2007 Sub Area Information Description Living Area Ft2 Gross Area Ft2 Factor Effective Ft2 Base Area 360 360 1.00 360 Base Semi Finished 320 320 .80 256 Upper Story Finished 360 360 .90 324 Utility Room Unfinished 264 .25 66 Total Living SF: 1,040 Total Gross SF: 1,304 Total Effective SF: 1,006 Residential Extra Features Description Dimensions Value /Unit Units Total NewValue Depreciated Value Year No Extra Features on Record http: / /www.pcpao.org /general _ radet.php ?pn = 15291559292001032002 4/3/2007 SCALE: 1 "-- 20' BOUNDARY SURVEY FND 3/4" IP (NO /) OPEN N. W. CORNER LOT 17, BLOCK A 6 GENERA L NOTES: 1. No instruments of record reflecting easements, rights -of-way, and /or ownership were furnished. except as shown. 2. No foundations or underground improvements located except os shown. J. If elevations are shown, such elevations are based on N.C.VO. 1929 (MSL - 0.00), Except Pinellas County Where elevations ore based on N.A.V. D. 1988 (MSL - 0.00'). 4. Declorotion is mode to original purchaser o/ the survey. If is not transferable to additional institutions or subsequent owners. 5. Surveyor has mode no investigation or independent search for easements of record, encumbrances, restrictive covenants. ownership title evidence, or any other facts that an accurate and current title scorch may disclose. 6. No water meters located except as shown. 7. This Survey is prepared (Or the exclusive use Of those parties certified herein and is valid for one (1) year from Date of Certification. i 6' W00¢ FENCE LOT 6 1 LOT 5 BLOCK A BLOCK A 05 fs.8' TWO STORY I�OO RAME dANOING RE IDENCE MX 0 OF wo00 STAIRS G N Z 26.4' " 3` f�3 e ° � 7x e9 f�Clf .. ° 14��3E�,��,' { I d DATE • e. 4 �� N.89-56'16 -W.(M) 255'(R) 255.76'(M) FND 314" IP (NO /) OPEN IN CONC. S. W. CORNER LOT 18, BLOCK ))A a�U f\ FND 518" IP (NO /) OPEN 6' WOOD OFF 0.8' -� 'PORnoN of LOT 30 BLOCK A (�DT /NCLUDE7 JASMINE LO LOT 29 0 BLOCK A 6' WOOD ON 1.3' E This property lies within Flood Zone X -as depicted on Flood Insurance Rote Mop Community Panel # 12103CO 108H Doted: 5 -17 -05 BENCHMARK: BASE FLOOD ELEVATION: SECTION-j5 - TOWNSHIP -29-S_RANGE 1-5L- BASIS OF BEARINGS: N. R/W LINE OF JASMINE WAY LEGAL DESCRIPTION. THE,. EAST 5 FEET OF LOT JO, AND ALL OF LOTS 31, 32, 33, AND 34, BLOCK A, MOUNT ORANGE REVISED PLAT, ACCORDING TO THE MAP OR PLAT THEREOF AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 6, PAGE 46, PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA. FAD 47x4" CM (NO 1/) MATCH LINE N.E. COr'NER 1 LOT 1, 31LOCK4 n BLOCK4A BLOCK A BLOCK A BLOC I KA I M oI o 6' CLF WOOD P.P. 55 '4 8 „E S2 (M Ur 8 v FND 4 "x4" CM 6' WOOD FENCE I 1 _ .8 iJ.J' fs.8' TWO STORY I�OO RAME dANOING RE IDENCE LINE I 0,804 wo00 STAIRS chargeinimum Technical Standards as set forth W000 FENCES 6 26.4' 15.8' Florida ;St'a��oesy�3g r Field Survey: 10 -9 -06 WIRE, FENS , � e ° d e e BUILDING TIE�IMENSION1� - f�Clf .. ° ° C�NC. 14��3E�,��,' { I d DATE • e. 4 a e1 CON e LOT 33 LOT 34 BLOCK A I BLOCK A 18.7' 22.1' I� r e ° CONC n � , I TILE .I - l PA0 �! LOT 31 LOT 32 I BLOCK A BLOCK A� Phi E. 5' OF LOT 30 'MM �i2 ��f I � 4.7' ONE STOR MASON�?Y RESIDENC #808 � ' 11.4' f4.4'_ 20.7(! l I GUY I.�LOCK A I I I I ANCHOR,' I Io I� I I FND 5/8" lP (NO /) OPEN 5 (R) 20'(11) .20 "(R) I � 20'(R) 23'(R) 12.1 _T / FND 5 /B" lP —' S. 89 "49' 1 1 " iii 88. 40'(Ml 88 rl R� (NO j) OPEN Gur � POWERLINES I I' I VCHOR � C WOOD P.P. I - P- P- P- P -P -P -P I ° � A HOR a a i I a I i 4 LO a � a I N; a e Iti Q N a � a O � (O a v D a Q. a I 0.5' CONC. CURB t REVISED: OFFICE LOCATION: 1305 SOUTH HIGHLAND AVE. CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33 75 6 -35 08 NOT VALID WITHOUT THE SIGNATURE AND THE ORIGINAL RAISED SEAL OF A FLORIDA LICENSED SURVEYOR AND MAPPER. PREPARED FOR AND CERTIFIED TO: OPTI DEVELOPMENT, INC. D.B.A. HOMEVESTERS NJ COPYRIGHT 0 2005 TARGET LAND SURVEYING INC. LEGEND: BM - Benchmark CB - Concrete Block CL - Centerline CM - Concrete Monument ELEV - Elevation FND -Found IP -Iron Pipe IR -Iron Rod ASP - Asphalt LS/ - Land Surveyor Registration Number N/T - Noil & Tob N3[D - Nail h Disk M.H. - Manhole P.R.M. - Permanent Reference Monument R/W -Right Of Way CONC - Concrete P.C. -Point OF Curvature P.T. -Point 01 Tangent P.R.C. -Point Of Reverse Curvature P.C.C. -Point 01 Compound Curve Ch. -Chord P.P. -Power Pole W.M. -Water Meter R.R.S. - Railroad Spike RAD. - Radius R - Record D -Deed M - Measured C - Calculated D.B. - Deed Book P.B. - Plot Book O.R. - Official Record Book PG -Page PVMT - Pavement P.O.B. Point 01 Beginning P.O.C. Point 01 Commencement CH.B. Chord Bearing R.P. - Radius Point CLF - Chain Link Fence P.C.P - Permanent Control Point P.I. - Point of Intersection WAY X60' R W� ASP. PvMr. I �y t 08 I W i MATCH Ll� B e i OD P.P. P -P i a P--1 P I 3 Q. i LINE LEGEND: _ TARGET LAND SURVEYING, INC. � CENTERLINES - BOUNDARY LINES P.O. BOX 663 BUILDING LINE --1 DUNEDIN, FL 34697 -0663 PH:(727) 784 -0573 PLAT LOT LINE--I_ _ �, EASEMENT d' CONC. ORIVLi LINE I I hereby' tho�'.this survey was made under my responsible —� c chargeinimum Technical Standards as set forth W000 FENCES 6 61 ; G 17 ',,Florida A�6`rr9eniSt�,otive Code, w CHAIN LINK FENCES x F Florida ;St'a��oesy�3g r Field Survey: 10 -9 -06 WIRE, FENS , � - � - BUILDING TIE�IMENSION1� - f�Clf .. 14��3E�,��,' { - f�1.0` =�6 Drawn By: B. MARCH DATE • 'ALE. 1 "= 20' BOUNDARY SURVEY FND 314' IP (NO /) OPEN N. W. CORNER LOT 17, BLOCK A R ^1 N N n IN h g 8 2 i LEGEND:. - BM .- Benchmark CB -Concrete Block CL - Cantedine CM - Concrete Monument ELEV - Elevation FWD - Found /P - Iron Pipe /R - Iron Rod ASP - Asphalt LS/ - Land Surveyor Registration Number NIT - Nail k Tab N &D - Nail k Disk M.H. - Manhole P.R.M. - Permanent Reference Monument RIW - Right Of Way CONC -. Concrete P.C. - Point OF Curvature P.T. - Point Of Tangent P.R.C. Point Of Reverse Curvature P.C.C. - Point Of Compound Curve Ch. - Chad P.P. - Power Pb_ le W.M. - Water Meter R.R.S. - Railroad Spike RAO. - Radius R - Record D - Deed- M - Measured C - Calculated Atka Deed Book P.B. - Plot Book O.R. - Official Record Book PG - Page PVMT - Pavement P.O.B. Point Of Beginninmgg P.O.C. Point Of Commencement CH.B. Chord Bearing R.P. - Radius Pain! CLF - Chain Link Fence P.C.P - Permanent Control Point P.l. - Point of Intersection GENERAL NOTES: 1. No instruments of record reflecting easements, rights -of -way, and /or ownership were furnished, except as shown. 2. No foundations or underground knprovements located except as shown. J. If elevations are shown, such elevations are based on N.C.V.O. 1929 (MSL 0.00), Except Plnpllgs County Where elevations ore based on NAV.O. 1988 (MSL 0.00). 4. Declaration is mods to original purchaser of the survey. It is not transferable to additional institutions or subsequent owners. 5. Surveyor has mode no imestigation or Independent -search for easements of record, mrcumbrance% restrictive covenants, ownership title evidence, or any other facts that an accurate andeurrent title search may disclose. 6. No water maters located except as shown. 7. This Survey is- prepared Iva the exclusive use of those sorties certified heroin and is valid for one (1) year from Data of Certification. This property lies within Flood Zone X as depicted on Flood Insurance Rote Mop Community Panel # 12103CO108H Dated: 5117105 BENCHMARK. BASE FLOOD ELEVATION: SECTION 1-5 _TOWNSHIP _29_S._RANGE_L5E_ BASIS OF BEARINGS: N. R/W LINE OF JASMINE WAY LEGAL DESCRIPTION: THE NORTH 50.63 OF LOTS 31, 32, 33, AND 34, BLOCK A, AND THE NORTH 50.63 OF BLOCK A, MOUNT ORANGE REVISED PLAT, ACCORDING TO THE MAP OR PLAT THEREOF AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 6, PAGE 46, PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA. Z W w i� a Q C= fY U4 o(I PROPOSED DIVISION OF `x = �� LOT 6 I LOT 5 I LOT 4 BLOCK A BLOCK A BLOCK A FNO 518' 6' (NO B OPEN 6' WOOD OFF 0.8' -y I 6' WOOD FENCE / PORTION OF E. 5' OF LOT 30 - BLOCK A d 6' CLF N b- 0 0 Iz - -- SET 1/2' IR I . w IS 3035 CONCRETE +OPOSED TO BE REMOVED , Low, PORTION 6' W000 FENCE 0. PORTION OF I PORTION OF I PORTION OF BLOCK A FND 41x4' CM LOT 32 LOT' 33 PORTION OF BLOCK A (NO /) BLOCK A .� M MATCH LINE N.E. CORNER LOT 1, BLOCK A LOT .3 LOT 2 LOT 1 FEE– BLOCK A BLOCK A I BLOCK A TO BE 1150 h O h C LESS p �tih d 0 pv b R b D P.P. 10 b- 0 0 Iz - -- SET 1/2' IR I . w IS 3035 CONCRETE +OPOSED TO BE REMOVED , Low, PORTION 6' W000 FENCE PORTION OF I PORTION OF I PORTION OF BLOCK A LOT 31 LOT 32 LOT' 33 PORTION OF BLOCK A BLOCK A BLOCK A .� BLOCK A O LOT AREA = 4467 SQUAREI FEE– PROPOSED N '-W RESDF_NCE TO BE 1150 FEET SO. OR LESS �tih d 0 pv b- 0 0 Iz - -- SET 1/2' IR I . w IS 3035 CONCRETE +OPOSED TO BE REMOVED , Low, S.89 °55'48 "W. 88. a OI CONC. I d EXlSTIN 0 1 FND 41W CM (NO /) PORTION OF LOT 34 BLOCK A 0 u N i i IL a � a © a 0 a SET 112- IR 88'(R) I a a � I Nr� 4 rryWy� I `V 1 a LOT 29 BLOCK A �`1 ONE STORY N x Y " (NOT INCLUDED) 6' � ON 1.3, MASO 1.3' I I � a SET 112' IR RESIDENCE o Ls 3035 #808 ui a of I I a hI I b I I I a PORTION OF w OF E. LOT '30 ? I PORTION OF PORTION OF PORTION OF PORTION OF LO 'K A LOT 31 LOT 32 LOT 33 LOT 34 (NOT IN�LUDED) I BLOCK A I BLOCK A I BLOCK A I BLOCK A (NOT INCLUDED) (NOT INCLUDED) (NOT INCLUDED) (NOT INCLUDED) M89'S6 M) I 255 (R) 255-" . 7676'(M) MD 314" /P -- FND 518' 1P S.89 °49'1 1 "i'�� 88.40' /M 88'(R MD 5/6' lP (NO /) OPEN IN CONC. (NO /) OPEN l ) l ) (NO /) OPEN S. W. CORNER LOT iQ BLOCK A REVISED. OFFICE LOCATION: 1305 SOUTH HIGHLAND AVE. CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 -3508 �InT VALID WITHOUT THE SIGNATURE AND ORIGINAL RAISED SEAL OF A FLORIDA L,uENSED SURVEYOR AND MAPPER. PREPARED FOR AND CERTIFIED. TO: OPTI DEVELOPMENT, INC. D. B.A. HOMEVESTERS I COPYRIGHT ® 2005 TARGET LAND SURVEYING INC. Kw CENTERLINE — BOUNDARY LINE BUILDING LINE --- PLAT LOT LINE ---3_ EASEMENT LINE POWER LINE —) P_P_ PP WOOD FENCE CHAIN LINK FENCE WIRE FENCE —i WATERLFLOOD_ZONE LINE BUILDING TIE (DIMENS /ON2:—a MATCH LINE L j CL I< I W TARGET LAND SURVEYING. INC. P:O. BOX 663 DUNEDIN, FL 34697 -0663 PH :(727) 784 -0573 I hereby certify _that this survey was mode under my responsible charge and_.meets.-tha minimum Technical Standards as set forth by the _Flarido-- Booi-d' of-Professional Land Surveyors in Chapter 61 -G 17,. Florida Administrative Code, pursuant to Section 472.027, Florida Statutes _ Field Survey: 05106107 ' _ L° FBI, 475 Pg 30 Phi p _C. _ Sfack Job# 061004.01 B RLS #3035;_.L-B #5570 05106107 Drawn By: B. MARCH DATE OF CERTIFICATION Surveyed By: D. FRISCIA PORTION LOT 31 BLOCK A NOT INCLM ( PORTION OF LOT 30 .� BLOCK A ( OT INCLUDED) 0 S.89 °55'48 "W. 88. a OI CONC. I d EXlSTIN 0 1 FND 41W CM (NO /) PORTION OF LOT 34 BLOCK A 0 u N i i IL a � a © a 0 a SET 112- IR 88'(R) I a a � I Nr� 4 rryWy� I `V 1 a LOT 29 BLOCK A �`1 ONE STORY N x Y " (NOT INCLUDED) 6' � ON 1.3, MASO 1.3' I I � a SET 112' IR RESIDENCE o Ls 3035 #808 ui a of I I a hI I b I I I a PORTION OF w OF E. LOT '30 ? I PORTION OF PORTION OF PORTION OF PORTION OF LO 'K A LOT 31 LOT 32 LOT 33 LOT 34 (NOT IN�LUDED) I BLOCK A I BLOCK A I BLOCK A I BLOCK A (NOT INCLUDED) (NOT INCLUDED) (NOT INCLUDED) (NOT INCLUDED) M89'S6 M) I 255 (R) 255-" . 7676'(M) MD 314" /P -- FND 518' 1P S.89 °49'1 1 "i'�� 88.40' /M 88'(R MD 5/6' lP (NO /) OPEN IN CONC. (NO /) OPEN l ) l ) (NO /) OPEN S. W. CORNER LOT iQ BLOCK A REVISED. OFFICE LOCATION: 1305 SOUTH HIGHLAND AVE. CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 -3508 �InT VALID WITHOUT THE SIGNATURE AND ORIGINAL RAISED SEAL OF A FLORIDA L,uENSED SURVEYOR AND MAPPER. PREPARED FOR AND CERTIFIED. TO: OPTI DEVELOPMENT, INC. D. B.A. HOMEVESTERS I COPYRIGHT ® 2005 TARGET LAND SURVEYING INC. Kw CENTERLINE — BOUNDARY LINE BUILDING LINE --- PLAT LOT LINE ---3_ EASEMENT LINE POWER LINE —) P_P_ PP WOOD FENCE CHAIN LINK FENCE WIRE FENCE —i WATERLFLOOD_ZONE LINE BUILDING TIE (DIMENS /ON2:—a MATCH LINE L j CL I< I W TARGET LAND SURVEYING. INC. P:O. BOX 663 DUNEDIN, FL 34697 -0663 PH :(727) 784 -0573 I hereby certify _that this survey was mode under my responsible charge and_.meets.-tha minimum Technical Standards as set forth by the _Flarido-- Booi-d' of-Professional Land Surveyors in Chapter 61 -G 17,. Florida Administrative Code, pursuant to Section 472.027, Florida Statutes _ Field Survey: 05106107 ' _ L° FBI, 475 Pg 30 Phi p _C. _ Sfack Job# 061004.01 B RLS #3035;_.L-B #5570 05106107 Drawn By: B. MARCH DATE OF CERTIFICATION Surveyed By: D. FRISCIA N ORIGINAL RECHVED APR 0 2 2007 PLANNING DEPARIMEW CITY OF CLEARW ATEp tr O • a ob a. ti to v o Ev Lm tA 14 F L ORIGINAL RECHVED APR 0 2 2007 PLANNING DEPARIMEW CITY OF CLEARW ATEp tr O ORIGINAL RECHVED APR 0 2 2007 PLANNING DEPARIMEW CITY OF CLEARW ATEp • ORIGINAL RECHVED APR 0 2 2007 PLANNING DEPARIMEW CITY OF CLEARW ATEp SCALE: 1 "= 20' BOUNDARY SURVEY FND 3/4' IP (NO 1) OPEN N. W. CORNER LOT 17, BLOCK A i LEGEND: BM - Benchmark CB - Concrete Block CL - Centerline CM - Concrete Monument ELEV - Elevofion FND - Found IP - Iron Pipe IR - Iron Rod ASP - Asphalt LSJ - Land Surveyor Registration Number NIT - Noil i Tab Nd'D - Nail & Disk M.H. — Manhole P.R.M. — Permanent Reference Monument R/W — Right Of Way CONC — Concrete P.C. — Point OF Curvature P.T. — Point Of Tangent P.R.C. — Point Of Reverse Curvature P.C.C. — Point Of Compound Curve Ch. — Chord P.P. — Power Pole W.M. — Water Meter R.R.S. — Railroad Spike RAO. — Radius R — Record D — Deed M — Measured C — Calculated D.B. — Deed Book P.B. — Plot Book O.R. — Official Record Book PG — Page PVI11T — Pavement P.O.B. Point Of Beginning P.O.C. Point Of Commencement CH.B. Chord Bearing R.P. — Radius Pant CLF — Chain Link Fence P.C.P — Permanent Control Point P.I. — Point of Intersection GENERAL NOTES: 1. No instruments of record reflecting easements, rights —of —way, and /or ownership were furnished• except as shown. 2. No foundations or underground improvements located except as shown. 3. If elevations ore shown, such elevations are based on N.G.V.D. 1929 (MSL 0.00), Except Pinellas County Where elevations ore based on N.A.V.D. 1988 (MSL 0.00). 4. Declaration is mode to original purchaser of the survey. If is not transferable to additional institutions or subsequent owners. 5. Surveyor has made no investigation or independent search for easements of record, encumbrances, restrictive covenants, ownership title evidence, or any other facts that an accurate and current title search may disclose. 6. No water meters located except as shown. 7. This Survey is prepared for the exclusive use of those parties certified herein and is valid for one (1) year from Date of Certification. This property lies within Flood Zone X as depicted on Flood Insurance Rote Mop Community Panel # 12103CO 108H Dated: 5-17-05 BENCHMARK. BASE FLOOD ELEVATION: SECTION- 1-5- - TOWNSHIP-29-S.- RANGE -l-5L- BASIS OF BEARINGS: N. R/W LINE OF JASMINE WAY LEGAL DESCRIP110N., THE SOUTH 85,84 FEET OF LOTS 31, 32, 33, AND 34, BLOCK A, MOUNT ORANGE REMISED PLAT, ACCORDING TO THE MAP OR PLAT THEREOF AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 6, PAGE 46, PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA. PROPOSED DIVISION-..,-OF LOTS LOT 6 LOT 5 BLOCK A BLOCK A I N89'S6')61Y.(M) 255'(R) 255.76'(M) FND 3/4' IP (NO /) OPEN IN CONC. S. W. CORNER LOT 18, BLOCK A I LOT J BLOCK SET 1/2 IR LS 3035 MATCHTLINE I LOT 4 I LOT 3 I LOT 2 I LOT 1 BLOCK A I BLOCK A I BLOCK A I BLOCK A FND 41x4' CM CORNER LOT LOT 34, BLOCK A PO 0 -, ..I z N 31 I q I 'on, N rV C POR770N OF PORTION OF $ g SI m m �Z 2 h N89'S6')61Y.(M) 255'(R) 255.76'(M) FND 3/4' IP (NO /) OPEN IN CONC. S. W. CORNER LOT 18, BLOCK A I LOT J BLOCK SET 1/2 IR LS 3035 MATCHTLINE I LOT 4 I LOT 3 I LOT 2 I LOT 1 BLOCK A I BLOCK A I BLOCK A I BLOCK A FND 41x4' CM CORNER LOT LOT 34, BLOCK A PO TION OF PORTION OF LOT 32 FRAME L)T 31 I BLOCK A I RESIDENCE BL (NOT CK A CLUDED). POR770N OF PORTION OF $ WOOD STAIRS 61 G 17, Florida Administrative Code, pursuant to Section 472.027, LOT 33 LOT 34 h p( BLOCK LUDED) (NOTL OT INCLUDED) h TWO STORY ° d e — 42: CONC a °I a p I CON � e LOT 29 1.�gi BLOCK A 6' WOOD OFF 4.0' ^' Q) Z SET 1/2' IR LS 3035 POWERLINES IIOo y P-P 4, , I REVISED: 1 -31 -07 (NEW LOT DIVISION) OFFICE LOCATION: 1305 SOUTH HIGHLAND AVE. CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 -3508 NOT VALID WITHOUT THE SIGNATURE AND THE ORIGINAL RAISED SEAL OF A FLORIDA LICENSED SURVEYOR AND MAPPER. PREPARED FOR AND CERTIFIED TO: OPTI DEVELOPMENT, INC. D. B.A. HOMEVESTERS I COPYRIGHT 0 2005 TARGET LAND SURVEYING INC. P a SET 112' IR LS 3035 LL 12.9 I .•�! 18.7' — a Q) e �F d u. 1 CONC. DRNEI < ` y 4 J CL TILE PATIO 4.7' ONE S T RY MASON Y RESIDE CE #808 I I I 20.7' 36.5 PORTION OF PORTION G!F PORTION OF POTION OF LOT 31 LOT 32 LOT JJ BLOCK A i BLOCK A i I BLOCK A I BLOCK A .70-OV mw S.89'49' 11 "W. 83.40'(IU) 83'(R) in Iw P P Q. Q a Z W � a �L i ! w a a e � a GUY ANCHOR G UOD P.P. P (^/ 12.0 MD (NO J) OPEN GUY � ! ^IANCHOR LL WOOD P.P. P —P —P -- P— P— P— P— P —P —P —N p P —P P GUY ° ( — ANCHOR a B ° a JASMINE WAY 60' R W)- ASP. PVMT. _ a FND 4x4' CM (NO /) N, E. CORNER LOT 1, BLOCK A e 14 w 8 vi i MATCH LINE "NE LEGEND,- TARGET LAND SURVEYING, INC. CENTERLINES _ _ FRAME X�0000 FANDING �� P.O. BOX 663 BUILDING LINE ---I RESIDENCE PLAT LOT LINE-- EASEMENT LINES I hereby certify that this survey was mode under my responsible POWER LINE P— P— a —P —N— #804 WOOD STAIRS 61 G 17, Florida Administrative Code, pursuant to Section 472.027, CHAIN LINK FENCE Florida Statutes '. Field Survey: 10 -9 -06 d e — 42: CONC a °I a p I CON � e LOT 29 1.�gi BLOCK A 6' WOOD OFF 4.0' ^' Q) Z SET 1/2' IR LS 3035 POWERLINES IIOo y P-P 4, , I REVISED: 1 -31 -07 (NEW LOT DIVISION) OFFICE LOCATION: 1305 SOUTH HIGHLAND AVE. CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 -3508 NOT VALID WITHOUT THE SIGNATURE AND THE ORIGINAL RAISED SEAL OF A FLORIDA LICENSED SURVEYOR AND MAPPER. PREPARED FOR AND CERTIFIED TO: OPTI DEVELOPMENT, INC. D. B.A. HOMEVESTERS I COPYRIGHT 0 2005 TARGET LAND SURVEYING INC. P a SET 112' IR LS 3035 LL 12.9 I .•�! 18.7' — a Q) e �F d u. 1 CONC. DRNEI < ` y 4 J CL TILE PATIO 4.7' ONE S T RY MASON Y RESIDE CE #808 I I I 20.7' 36.5 PORTION OF PORTION G!F PORTION OF POTION OF LOT 31 LOT 32 LOT JJ BLOCK A i BLOCK A i I BLOCK A I BLOCK A .70-OV mw S.89'49' 11 "W. 83.40'(IU) 83'(R) in Iw P P Q. Q a Z W � a �L i ! w a a e � a GUY ANCHOR G UOD P.P. P (^/ 12.0 MD (NO J) OPEN GUY � ! ^IANCHOR LL WOOD P.P. P —P —P -- P— P— P— P— P —P —P —N p P —P P GUY ° ( — ANCHOR a B ° a JASMINE WAY 60' R W)- ASP. PVMT. _ a FND 4x4' CM (NO /) N, E. CORNER LOT 1, BLOCK A e 14 w 8 vi i MATCH LINE "NE LEGEND,- TARGET LAND SURVEYING, INC. CENTERLINES _ _ BOUNDARY LINE--I P.O. BOX 663 BUILDING LINE ---I DUNEDIN, FL 34697 -0663 PH:(727) 784 -0573 PLAT LOT LINE-- EASEMENT LINES I hereby certify that this survey was mode under my responsible POWER LINE P— P— a —P —N— charge and meets the minimum Technical Standards as set forth by the Florida Board .qC. Professional Land Surveyors in Chapter WOOD FENCE- w- 61 G 17, Florida Administrative Code, pursuant to Section 472.027, CHAIN LINK FENCE Florida Statutes '. Field Survey: 10 -9 -06 WIRECE--:j, f' WATERLFLOOD ZONE LINES wA' .. FB# 475 Pg 30 BUILDING TIE DIMENSION --- -� - -1� P.,. PhCl , ' %�. SfC1Ck Jobs 061004.01 B RLS f ,3035, LB 115570 10 -13 -06 Drawn By: B. MARCH DATE OF CERTIFICATION Surveyed By: D. FRISCIA SCALE: I"= 20' BOUNDARY SURVEY LEGEND: BM - Benchmark CB - Concrete Block CL - Centerline CM - Concrete Monument ELEV - Elevation FND - Found IP - Iron Pipe IR - Iron Rod ASP - Asphalt LS/ - Land Surveyor Registration Number N/T - Noil k Tab N&D - Nail h Disk M.H. - Manhole P.R.M. - Permanent Reference Monument R/W - Right Of Way CONC - Concrete P.C. - Point OF Curvature P.T. - Point Of Tangent P.R.C. - Point Of Reverse Curvature P.C.C. - Point Of Compound Curve Ch. - Chord P.P. - Power Pole W.M. - Water Meter R.R.S. - Railroad Spike RAD. - Radius R - Record D - Deed M - Measured C - Calculated D.B. - Deed Book P.B. - Plot Book O.R. - Official Record Book PG - Page PVMT - Pavement P.O.B. Point Of Beginning P.O.C. Point Of Commencement CH.B. Chord Bearing R.P. - Radius Point CLF - Chain Link Fence P.C.P - Permanent Control Point P.I. - Point of Intersection GENERAL NOTES: 1. No instruments of record reflecting easements, rights -of -way, and /or ownership were furnished, except as shown. 2. No foundotfons or underground improvements located except as shown. 3. If elevations we shown, such elevations ore based on N.G.V.D. 1929 MSL - 0.00' , Except Pinellas County Where eevations ore based on N.A.V.D. 1988 (MR - 0.00). 4. Declorotion is mode to original purchaser of the survey. It is not transferable to additional institutions or subsequent owners. 5. Surveyor has mode no investigation or independent search for easements of record, encumbronees, restrictive covenants, ownership title "donee, or any other facts that on accurate and current title search may disclose. 6. No water meters located except as shown. 7. This Survey is prepared for the exclusive use of those parties certified herein and is valid for one (1) year from Dote of Certification. 0�> OSO FND 3/4" IP (NO /) OPEN N. W. CORNER LOT 17, BLOCK A z N N i I N m !n g YI i I N.89-56'16'W(M) 255'(R) 255.76'(M) FND 314 v IP -- (NO /) OPEN IN CONIC. S. W. CORNER LOT 18, BLOCK A This property lies within Flood Zone X -as depicted on Flood Insurance Rate Map Community Panel # 12103CO 108H Dated: 5-17-05 BENCHMARK: BASE FLOOD ELEVATION: SECTION 1-5 — TOWNSHIP--2-9-5-.- RANGE -l-5L- BASIS OF BEARINGS: N. R/W LINE OF JASMINE WAY LEGAL DESCRIPTION: THE NORTH 50.63 FEET OF LOTS 31, 32, 33, AND 34, BLOCK A, MOUNT ORANGE REVISED PLAT, ACCORDING TO THE MAP OR PLAT THEREOF AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 6, PAGE 46, PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA. LOT 2 PROPOSED DIVISION OF LOTS BLOCK A I BLOCK A I BLOCK A I BLOCK A i BLOCK A i 6' WOOD FENCE LOT 29 BLOCK A 6' WOOD OFF 4.7' SET i LS 3 PORTION OF LOT 30 BLOCK A (NOT INCLUDE! 6' CLF 8.4' I I� (0 " 8.3' 10 WOOD LANDING O WOOD Z STAIRS CS f to O '55'48"E. 8121'(M) 83'A 1 w I 6' W000 FENCE PORTION OFI PORTION OF LOT 32 � I PORTION OF BLOCK A " LOT 33 BLOCK A BLOCK A TWO STORY RAME RE IDENCE #804 26.4' d o IR - ° S�3I a �. ° 'h PORTION LOT 31 e BLOCK A a i k i i q i MATCH LINE T LOT 1 BLOCK A h 0 a D P.P. t FND 4"x4" CM (NO /) PORTION OF LOT 34 BLOCK A PROPOSED PARKING AREA d o i SET 1/2" IR vi l LS 3035 o�z;I A. ONE ST RY MASON Y RESIDE CE #808 .. i � a O a Ai a N h o a o vi a 12.9'1 REVISED: 1 -31 -07 (NEW LOT DIVISION) OFFICE LOCATION: 1305 SOUTH HIGHLAND AVE. LINE LEGEND: CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33 75 6 -35 08 CENTERLINES NOT VALID WITHOUT THE SIGNATURE AND -- BOUNDARY LINE THE ORIGINAL RAISED SEAL OF A FLORIDA BUILDING LINE ---� LICENSED SURVEYOR AND MAPPER. PREPARED FOR AND CERTIFIED TO: PLAT LOT LINE EASEMENT LINE_ --� _ OPTI DEVELOPMENT, INC. POWER LINE D. B.A. HOMEVESTERS D WOOD FENCE w —w CHAIN LINK FENCE O PiPR 02 2007 WIRE FENP� ^x WATER/FLOOD ZONE LINE O BUILDING TIELIMENSION2-a PLANNING DEPARTMEN! r1W OF r9.EARWATER COPYRIGHT 0 2005 TARGET LAND SURVEYING INC. Q I \I �I W Z FND 4'x4" CM (NO /) N.E. CORNER. LOT 1, BLOCK A D �I M S 1 ui �1 MATCH LINE TARGET LAND SURVEYING. INC. P.O. BOX 663 DUNEDIN, FL 34697 -0663 PH:(727) 784 -0573 I hereby certify that this survey was made under my responsible charge and meets the minimum Technical Standards as set forth by the Florida Board of Professional Land Surveyors in Chapter 61 G 17, Florida Administrative Code, pursuant to Section 472.027, Florida Statutes Field Survey: 10 -9 -06 U St& FB# 475 P9 30 Phi I/ `C. Stock Job# 061004.01A RLS" #3035, LB #5570 10— 13 -06 Drawn By: B. MARCH DATE OF CERTIFICATION Surveyed By: D. FRISCIA PORTION OF PORTION OF PORTION OF PORTION OF LOT 31 LOT 32 LOT JJ LOT J4 BLOCK A I BLOCK A I BLOCK A I BLOCK A (NOT INCLUDED) (NOT INCLUDED) . (NOT INCLUDED) (NOT INCLUDED) __i__i__I__I REVISED: 1 -31 -07 (NEW LOT DIVISION) OFFICE LOCATION: 1305 SOUTH HIGHLAND AVE. LINE LEGEND: CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33 75 6 -35 08 CENTERLINES NOT VALID WITHOUT THE SIGNATURE AND -- BOUNDARY LINE THE ORIGINAL RAISED SEAL OF A FLORIDA BUILDING LINE ---� LICENSED SURVEYOR AND MAPPER. PREPARED FOR AND CERTIFIED TO: PLAT LOT LINE EASEMENT LINE_ --� _ OPTI DEVELOPMENT, INC. POWER LINE D. B.A. HOMEVESTERS D WOOD FENCE w —w CHAIN LINK FENCE O PiPR 02 2007 WIRE FENP� ^x WATER/FLOOD ZONE LINE O BUILDING TIELIMENSION2-a PLANNING DEPARTMEN! r1W OF r9.EARWATER COPYRIGHT 0 2005 TARGET LAND SURVEYING INC. Q I \I �I W Z FND 4'x4" CM (NO /) N.E. CORNER. LOT 1, BLOCK A D �I M S 1 ui �1 MATCH LINE TARGET LAND SURVEYING. INC. P.O. BOX 663 DUNEDIN, FL 34697 -0663 PH:(727) 784 -0573 I hereby certify that this survey was made under my responsible charge and meets the minimum Technical Standards as set forth by the Florida Board of Professional Land Surveyors in Chapter 61 G 17, Florida Administrative Code, pursuant to Section 472.027, Florida Statutes Field Survey: 10 -9 -06 U St& FB# 475 P9 30 Phi I/ `C. Stock Job# 061004.01A RLS" #3035, LB #5570 10— 13 -06 Drawn By: B. MARCH DATE OF CERTIFICATION Surveyed By: D. FRISCIA