Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
FLD2007-11035
LL o Col arwater Planning Dy tle A ent 100 South M rtle Avenue Clearwater, Florida 33756 u Telephone: 727 - 562 -4567 Fax: 727 -562 -4865 ❑ SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION ❑ SUBMIT 14 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION -Plans and application are required to be collated, stapled, and folded into sets ❑ SUBMIT FIRE PRELIMARY SITE PLAN: $200.00 ❑ SUBMIT APPLICATION FEE CASE #: RECEIVED BY (staff initials): DATE RECEIVED: * NOTE: 15 TOTAL SETS OF INFORMATION REQUIRED (APPLICATIONS PLUS SITE PLAN SETS) " talNAl MAR 07 2000 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project (Revised 04/24/2007) PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT- A. APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4- 202.A) APPLICANT NAME: MAILING ADDRESS PHONE NUMBER: CELL NUMBER PROPERTY OWNER(S): List ALL owners on the deed AGENT NAME: MAILING ADDRESS: PHONE NUMBER: CELL NUMBER: Doug Dale, Verizon Corporate Real Estate 2200 W. Airfield Drive, Dock E E MC: HQD01D76, DFW Airport, TX 75261 972.615.4039 FAX NUMBER: 214.437.7119 EMAIL: GTE Florida, Inc., c/o Property Tax Section General Telephone Company of Florida James H. Shimberg, Jr. Holland & KNight LLP 100' iNd 7th- �.TamoaSStreet. _':Suite :41:00. Tampa, FL 33602 -3644 813.227.6412 FAX NUMBER: 81 3.314.5108 813.293.1912 EMAIL: jim.shimberq @hklaw.com B. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4- 202.A) PROJECT NAME: Verizon Office PROJECT VALUATION: $ 300, 000.00 STREET ADDRESS 1280 Cleveland Street, Clearwater PARCEL NUMBER(S): 15- 29 -15- 26658- 000 -0010, 15- 29 -15- 12276- 003 -0010, see below PARCEL SIZE (acres): 3.3 acres PARCEL SIZE (square feet): 145,135 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: 15- 29 -15- 12276- 003 -0130 and 15- 29 -15- 65250 - 002 -0010 PROPOSED USE(S): No new uses proposed DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST: Retain existing 185194 square feet of Utilities /Infrastructure Specifically identify the request (include number of units or square Facility uses and create new vacant lot; site plan to reflect footage of non - residential use and all existing building and new parking layout; Termination of requested code deviations; e.g. Status of Nonconformity to Height and FAR of existing reduction in required number of �Ui7 lIl parking spaces, specific use, etc.) g C: \Documents and Settings \derek.ferguson\ Desktop\ planningforms _0707\Comprehensive Infill Project (FLD) 04- 24- 07.doc Page 1 of 8 . 'MURPHY LAROCCACONSULTING;�UP; INC...: j• URBAN PLANNING AND REAL ESTATE GvNSULTING . i . f TERRI A. VERTES BANK OF AMERICA PLAZA = 1,01'E. KENNEDY BOULEVARD, SUITE 3020 TAMPA; FLORIDA 33602 _ f TEL: (813) 226 -8970 FAX: -(813) 229 -0617. Terri .VertesOMurphyLaRocca.com.' J 1� nr �(QitJ`iVQ .NIL k DOES THIS APPLICATION INVOLVE THE TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS (TDR), A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED PLANNED UNI DEVELOPMENT, OR A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED (CERTIFIED) SITE PLAN? YES _ NO _ (if yes, attach a copy of the applicable documents) C. PROOF OF OWNERSHIP: (Code Section 4- 202.A.5) ❑ SUBMIT A COPY OF THE TITLE INSURANCE POLICY, DEED TO THE PROPERTY OR SIGN AFFIDAVIT ATTESTING OWNERSHIP (see page 7) D. ❑ 1. WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 3- 913.A) Provide complete responses to the six (6) GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA — Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail: The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. See attached. 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. See attached. 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use. See attached. 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. See attached. 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. See attached. 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts, on adjacent properties. See attached. ORIGINAL MAR 07 2000 -'WNNING DEPARTMEN7 G11Y OF CLEARWATER C: \Documents and Settings \derek.ferguson\ Desktop\ planningforms _0707\Comprehensive Infill Project (FLD) 04- 24- 07.doc Page 2 of 8 WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project Criteria) ❑ Provide complete responses to the six (6) COMPREHENSIVE INFILL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT CRITERIA — Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail: 1. The development or redevelopment is otherwise impractical without deviations from the use and /or development stanUbak forth in this zoning district. RECEIVED See attached. -------_____.._ ............. ._._....... _.......__-_.---__---.____...------.-------..__._..------- _ ------- ---- __.. ._.__.- .------- .__..----- - - - -_- -MAR 0 .... -- ........ _____ -_ - - - -- - - -- - - - - -- -- - - - - -- 200K -- ............ . ......... ...... _ .... ... .................................. ........................................... - .... __ ................ _ ........ _ .... .......... ..._......._.........._........................................................ _._ ........ _......... ........ _ .......... ........__......................._..............................._...._................... .._...._..._...............2Lt KING- DEPARTIVIENT....._ or- 2. The development or redevelopment will be consistent with the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan, asl well as'NRgeneral purpose, intent and basic planning objectives of this Code, and with the intent and purpose of this zoning district ___See __attached_,_ 3. The development or redevelopment will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of surrounding properties. See attached. 4. Adjoining properties will not suffer substantial detriment as a result of the proposed development. See attached. 5. The proposed use shall otherwise be permitted by the underlying future land use category, be compatible with adjacent land uses, will not substantially alter the essential use characteristics of the neighborhood; and shall demonstrate compliance with one or more of the following objectives: a. The proposed use is permitted in this zoning district as a minimum standard, flexible standard or flexible development use; b. The proposed use would be a significant economic contributor to the City's economic base by diversifying the local economy or by creating jobs; c. The development proposal accommodates the expansion or redevelopment of an existing economic contributor; d. The proposed use provides for the provision of affordable housing; e. The proposed use provides for development or redevelopment in an area that is characterized by other similar development and where a land use plan amendment and rezoning would result in a spot land use or zoning designation; or f. The proposed use provides for the development of a new and /or preservation of a working waterfront use. See attached. 6. Flexibility with regard to use, lot width, required setbacks, height and off - street parking are justified based on demonstrated compliance with all of the following design objectives: a. The proposed development will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of the surrounding properties for uses permitted in this zoning district; b. The proposed development complies with applicable design guidelines adopted by the .City; c. The design, scale and intensity of the proposed development supports the established or emerging character of an area; d. In order to form a cohesive, visually interesting and attractive appearance, the proposed development incorporates a substantial number of the following design elements: ❑ Changes in horizontal building planes; ❑ Use of architectural details such as columns, cornices, stringcourses, pilasters, porticos, balconies, railings, awnings, etc.; ❑ Variety in materials, colors and textures; ❑ Distinctive fenestration patterns; ❑ Building stepbacks; and ❑ Distinctive roofs forms. e. The proposed development provides for appropriate buffers, enhanced landscape design and appropriate distances between buildings. See attached. S: \Planning Department\Application Forms \Development Review \2007 Forms \Comprehensive Infill Project (FLD) 04- 24- 07.doc Page 3 of 8 E. STORMWATER PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteria Manual and 4- 202.A.21) ❑ A STORMWATER NARRATIVE MUST BE SUBMITTED WITH ALL APPLICATIONS. All applications that involve addition or modification of impervious surface, including buildings, must include a stormwater plan that demonstrates compliance with the City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteria manual. A reduction in impervious surface area does not qualify as an exemption to this requirement. El If If a plan is not required, the narrative shall provide an explanation as to why the site is exempt. RECEIVED ❑ At a minimum, the STORMWATER PLAN shall include the following; MAR ❑ Existing topography extending 50 feet beyond all property lines; M AD R ti 2U00 ❑ Proposed grading including finished floor elevations of all structures; ❑ All adjacent streets and municipal storm systems; PLANNING DEPARTMENT L3 Proposed stormwater detention /retention area including top of bank, toe of slope and outlet control structure; CITY OF CLEAR WATER ❑ A narrative describing the proposed stormwater control plan including all calculations and data necessary to demonstrate compliance with the City manual. ❑ Proposed stormwater detention /retention area including top of bank, toe of slope and outlet control structure; ❑ Signature and seal of Florida Registered Professional Engineer on all plans and calculations. ❑ COPY OF PERMIT INQUIRY LETTER OR SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT (SWFWMD) PERMIT SUBMITTAL (SWFWMD approval is required prior to issuance of City Building Permit), if applicable ❑ ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF STORMWATER PLAN REQUIREMENTS (Applicant must initial one of the following): _ _ Stormwater plan as noted above is included St rmwater plan is not required and explanation narrative is attached. At a minimum, a grading plan and finished floor elevations shall be provided. CAUTION — IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A STORMWATER PLAN AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 562 -4750. F. SUPPLEMENTAL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 4- 202.A) ❑ SIGNED AND SEALED SURVEY (including legal description of property) — One original and 14 copies; ❑ TREE SURVEY (including existing trees on site and within 25' of the adjacent site, by species, size (DBH 4" or greater), and location, including drip lines and indicating trees to be removed) — please design around the existing trees; ❑ TREE INVENTORY; prepared by a "certified arborist", of all trees 4" DBH or greater, reflecting size, canopy (drip lines) and condition of such trees; ❑ LOCATION MAP OF THE PROPERTY; ❑ PARKING DEMAND STUDY in conjunction with a request to make deviations to the parking standards (ie. Reduce number of spaces). Prior to the submittal of this application, the methodology of such study shall be approved by the Community Development Coordinator and shall be in accordance with accepted traffic engineering principles. The findings of the study will be used in determining whether or not deviations to the parking standards are approved; ❑ GRADING PLAN, as applicable; ❑ PRELIMINARY PLAT, as required (Note: Building permits will not be issued until evidence of recording a final plat is provided); ❑ COPY OF RECORDED PLAT, as applicable; S: \Planning Department\Application Forms \Development Review\2007 Forms \Comprehensive Infill Project (FLD) 04- 24- 07.doc Page 4of8 G. SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4- 202.A) ORIGINAL ❑ RFCFNED SITE PLAN with the following information (not to exceed 24" x 36 "): Index sheet referencing individual sheets included in package; &App North arrow; ` IAR 07 f 200 0 Engineering bar scale (minimum scale one inch equals 50 feet), and date prepared; PLANNING DEPARTMENT All dimensions; CITY OF CLEARWATER Footprint and size of all EXISTING buildings and structures; Footprint and size of all PROPOSED buildings and structures; All required setbacks; All existing and proposed points of access; All required sight triangles;, Identification of environmentally unique areas, such as watercourses, wetlands, tree masses, and specimen trees, including _ description and location of understory, ground cover vegetation and wildlife habitats, etc; Location of all public and private easements; Location of all street rights -of -way within and adjacent to the site; Location of existing public and private utilities, including fire hydrants, storm and sanitary sewer lines, manholes and lift stations, gas and water lines; All parking spaces, driveways, loading areas and vehicular use areas; Depiction by shading or crosshatching of all required parking lot interior landscaped areas; Location of all solid waste containers, recycling or trash handling areas and outside mechanical equipment and all required screening {per Section 3- 201(D)(i) and Index #701 }; Location of all landscape material; Location of all onsite and offsite storm -water management facilities; Location of all outdoor lighting fixtures; and Location of all existing and proposed sidewalks. ❑ SITE DATA TABLE for existing, required, and proposed development, in written /tabular form: Existing 185,194 SF 185,194 SF Utilities /Infrastructure Facility. No Change. EXISTING REQUIRED PROPOSED Land area in square feet and acres; Number of EXISTING dwelling units; Number of PROPOSED dwelling units; Gross floor area devoted to each use; Parking spaces: total number, presented in tabular form with the number of required spaces; Total paved area, including all paved parking spaces & driveways, expressed in square feet & percentage of the paved vehicular area; Official records book and page numbers of all existing utility _ easement; Building and structure heights; Impermeable surface ratio (I.S.R.); and Floor area ratio (F.A.R.) for all nonresidential uses. ❑ REDUCED COLOR SITE PLAN to scale (8' /s X 11); ❑ FOR DEVELOPMENTS OVER ONE ACRE, provide the following additional information on site plan: One -foot contours or spot elevations on site; Offsite elevations if required to evaluate the proposed stormwater management for the parcel; All open space areas; Location of all earth or water retaining walls and earth berms; Lot lines and building lines (dimensioned); Streets and drives (dimensioned); Building and structural setbacks (dimensioned); Structural overhangs; C: \Documents and Settings \derek.ferguson\ Desktop \planningforms_0707 \Comprehensive Infill Project (FLD) 04- 24- 07.doc Page 5 of 8 H. LANDSCAPING PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4- 1102.A) ORIGINAL ❑ LANDSCAPE PLAN with the following information (not to exceed 24" x 36 "): RECEN D Ll UN All existing and proposed structures; MAR 07 2008 Names of abutting streets; (( _ Drainage and retention areas including swales, side slopes and bottom elevations; PLANNING DEPARTMENT Delineation and dimensions of all required perimeter landscape buffers; CITY OF CLEARWATER Sight visibility triangles; Delineation and dimensions of all parking areas including landscaping islands and curbing; Existing trees on -site and immediately adjacent to the site, by species, size and locations, including driplines (as indicated on required _ tree survey); Location, size, and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, indicated by a key relating to the plant schedule; Plant schedule with a key (symbol or label) indicating the size, description, specifications, quantities, and spacing requirements of all existing and proposed landscape materials, including botanical and common names; Typical planting details for trees, palms, shrubs and ground cover plants including instructions, soil mixes, backfilling, mulching and protective measures; Interior landscaping areas hatched and /or shaded and labeled and interior landscape coverage, expressing in both square feet and percentage covered; Conditions of a previous development approval (e.g. conditions imposed by the Community Development Board); Irrigation notes. REDUCED COLOR LANDSCAPE PLAN to scale (8 % X 11); COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM application, as applicable. Landscape associated with the Comprehensive Landscape Program shall exceed minimum Code requirements to offset the areas where minimum Code will not be met. I. BUILDING ELEVATION PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4- 202.A.23) ❑ BUILDING ELEVATION DRAWINGS — with the following information; All sides of all buildings; Dimensioned; Colors (provide one full sized set of colored elevations); Materials; Sight visibility triangles; ❑ REDUCED BUILDING ELEVATIONS — same as above to scale on 8 % X 11. J. SIGNAGE: (Division 19. SIGNS / Section 3 -1806) ❑ All EXISTING freestanding and attached signs; Provide photographs and dimensions (area, height, etc.), indicate whether they will be removed or to remain. ❑ All PROPOSED freestanding and attached signs; Provide details including location, size, height, colors, materials and drawing; freestanding signs shall include the street address (numerals) ❑ Comprehensive Sign Program application, as applicable (separate application and fee required). ❑ Reduced signage proposal (8' /z X 11) (color), if submitting Comprehensive Sign Program application. C: \Documents and Settings \derek.ferguson\ Desktop\ planningforms _0707\Comprehensive Infill Project (FLD) 04- 24- 07.doc Page 6 of 8 K. TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY: (Section 4202.A.13 and 4801.C) RECOVER ❑ Include if required by the Traffic Operations Manager or his /her designee or if the proposed development: MAR 07 2008 • Will degrade the acceptable level of service for any roadway as adopted in the Comprehensive Plan. PLANNING DEPARTMENT • Will generate 100 or more new vehicle directional trips per hour and /or 1000 or more new vehicle trips per day. CITY OF CLEARWATER • Will affect a nearby roadway segment and /or intersection with five (5) reportable accidents within the prior twelve (12) month period or that is on the City's annual list of most hazardous intersections. Trip generation shall be based on the most recent edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineer's (ITE) Trip General Manual. The Traffic Impact Study must be prepared in accordance with a " Scoping Meeting" held with the Traffic Operations Manager and the Planning Department's Development Review Manager or their designee (727 -562 -4750) Refer to Section 4 -801 C of the Community Development Code for exceptions to this requirement. Acknowledgement of traffic impact study requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following): Traffic Impact Study is included. The study must include a summary table of pre- and posfdevelopment levels of service for all ro way legs and each turning movement at all intersections identified in the Scoping Meeting. Traffic Impact Study is not required. CAUTION - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 562- 4750. L. FIRE FLOW CALCULATIONS/ WATER STUDY: Provide Fire Flow Calculations. Water Study by a FIRE PROTECTION ENGINEER to assure an adequate water supply is available and to determine if any upgrades are required by the developer due to the impact of this project. The water supply must be able to support the needs of any required fire sprinkler, standpipe and /or fire pump. If a fire pump is required the water supply must be able to supply 150% of its rated capacity. Compliance with the 2004 Florida Fire Prevention Code to include NFPA 13, MFPA 14, NFPA 20, NFPA 291, and MFPA 1142 (Annex H) is required. L3 Acknowledgement of fire flow calculations /water study requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following): Fire Flow Calculations/Water Study is included. Fire Flow Calculations/Water Study is not required. CAUTION - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A FIRE FLOW CALCULATIONS/ WATER STUDY AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Fire Prevention Department at (727) 562 -4334. M. SIGNATURE: I, the undersigned, acknowledge that all representations made in this application are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge and authorize City representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application. of STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS Sworn to and subscribed before me this day of `P1 ���jE►� A.D. 20 07 to me and /or by who is personally known has produced �PrS�n G,.l L k 1n�w ic� as identification! �— TERRI ANNE VERTES Notary public, EXPIRES: December 17, 2009 My commission expires: �,fPF �g; Bonded Thru Notary Public Underwriters Page 6 of 7 N. AFFIDAVIT TO AUTHORIZE AGENT: ORIGINAL RECEIVED 1. Provide names of all property owners on deed - PRINT full names: General Telephone Company of Florida MAR 47 2000 PLANNING DEPARTMENT 2. That (I am /we are) the owner(s) and record title holder(s) of the following described property (address or general location): 3.2_$_0.......C.leve_ land ....... S.tre.et.,.__Cl.earwat.er -,. FL.._ _ 337. 5. 5. ._ ............... ._ .......... ._ .. _............ ........... ............................ ... .__._- ____.__ __. 3. That this property constitutes the property for which a request for a: (describe request) Flexible Development Application (Residential Infill Project) and 111 _.. ........ ......... _. Flexible Development Application (Comprehensive Infill. Redevelopment p_r o j e c t )..........__ 4. That the undersigned (has/have) appointed and (doesfdo) appoint: James H. Shimberg, Jr., Holland & Knight Tampa, Florida _... ...._._ .............._......_._ _.._ _—__—_.__._.__._ - -- as (his /their) agent(s) to execute any petitions or other documents necessary to affect such petition; 5, That this affidavit has been executed to induce the City of Clearwater, Florida to consider and act on the above described property; 6. That site visits to the property are necessary by City representatives in order to process this application and the owner authorizes City representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application; 7. That (itwe), the undersigned authority, hereby certify that the foregoing is true and correct. Property Owner yP�ro/pert y O er ................ . _..__.. _... ,.,.,..... ��/ .. .... ............... Property Owner Property Owner DO��IQS Vii, cG STATE OF _ : � I � q ci b °fZ v€�izovr• BOUNTY OF RNettAS - Tk.^(JS Before me the undersigned, an officer duly commissioned by the laws of the State of 'Ft a, on this J ....... .... ... _._. day of O9 personally appeared ... who having been first duly sworn Deposes and says that he /she fully understands the contents of the affidavit that he/she signed. �QgY Rrje 0 zo. c� Cherie K Rudolph Feasley * Miy Commission Expires v ... + 11114/2009 3W-J—k- K-1--1 Notary Public Signature Notary Seal/Stamp My Commission Expires: (1- �__'¢�iC�......._ ....v...._.. ._._........._._.._......._.._. C.SDocuments and Setting sW erek .rerguson%Desktoptplanningforms 0707tflexible Standard Development (F.S) 04.24.07.doe Page 7 of 7 This Document Prepared by: Mary W. Clark, Senior Paralegal Verizon — HQE03H08 600 Hidden Ridge - Irving, TX 75038 Return to: VERIZON FLORIDA LLC AFFIDAVIT OF CORPORATE SUCCESSION TO TITLE FROM VARIOUS ENTITIES, INCLUDING: VERIZON FLORIDA INC. GTE FLORIDA INCORPORATED GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY OF FLORIDA PENINSULAR TELEPHONE COMPANY MAR 0 3 2008 BY.............. _a__s.. ORIGINAL RECEIVED MAR 07 2008 PLANNING DEPARTMENT_ Cam' OF CLEARWATER The Affiant, after being duly sworn and deposed, makes this affidavit to identify and explain the corporate succession to title from various owners of record for property located in the state of FLORIDA. 1. Peninsular Telephone Company changed its name to General Telephone Company of Florida, effective March 26, 1958. 2. General Telephone Company of Florida changed its name to GTE Florida Incorporated, effective January 1, 1988. GTE Florida Incorporated changed its name to Verizon Florida Inc., effective June 30, 2000. 4. Verizon Florida Inc. converted to a Florida limited liability company and became Verizon Florida LLC effective November 15, 2006. Dated: February 21, 2008 VERIZON FLORIDA LLC By: rY✓ Ro alynn Ohristian, Assistant Secretary STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF DALLAS I, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for said County, in said State, hereby certify that Rosalynn Christian, whose name as Assistant Secretary of Verizon Florida LLC, a Florida limited liability company, is signed to the foregoing Affidavit, and who is known to me, acknowledged before me on this day, that she, as such officer, with full authority, executed the same voluntarily for and as the act of said limited liability company. Given under my hand and official seal this 21St day of February, 2008. AFFID -corp succ -vfl NOTARY PYIPLIC Mary Clark, to of Texas MARY CLARk S S 3 a Notary Public. State of Texas My Commission Expires 14-22.88 yf� '� AFFID -corp succ -vfl NOTARY PYIPLIC Mary Clark, to of Texas ORIGINAL MAR 0 7 2000 ASSISTANT SECRETARY'S CERTIFICATE PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER I, Rosalynn Christian, a duly appointed and qualified Assistant Secretary of Verizon Florida LLC (the "Company "), do hereby certify that: 1. On July 19, 2002, the Company adopted Corporate Policy Statement 103 (CPS - 103) "Authority to Approve Transactions," as it may be amended from time to time, effective June 1, 2002; and 2. John Terpin, Director -Real Estate Operations, or Douglas M. Dale, Manager - Transactions, are authorized, pursuant to the signing authorities adopted by the aforementioned resolution and a duly authorized delegation of authority, to make, enter into, and sign agreements and documents, related to real estate located on 1280 Cleveland St., Pinellas County, Clearwater, Florida on behalf of the Company. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have signed this certificate and affixed the seal of the Company this 21 st day of February, 2008. ,® raj® Rosal nn C ristian Assistant Secretary > 1901 Q���� FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION (RESIDENTIAL INFILL PROJECT) FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION (COMPREHENSIVE INFILL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT) For VERIZON -4280 CLEVELAND STREET ORIGINAL RECEIVED WRITTEN DESCRIPTION (REVISED) MAR 0 7 2000 March 4, 2008 ' CITY OF CD�WA ERr Background The subject property is located on the north side of Cleveland Street between Betty Lane and Fredrica Avenue The property contains an existing Utilities /Infrastructure Facility related to Verizon operations and existing parking. The current owner desires to sell off approximately 40% of the surplus underutilized land it owns to the north of the existing Verizon building and parking lot. This will result in the separation of the existing parcel into two parcels. The northern parcel that will be sold is entirely within the MHDR zoning district. The retained portion of the property is located within two zoning districts: Medium High Density Residential (MHDR) and Downtown (D). This is the subject property. We are submitting two Flexible Development Applications -a Residential Infill Project and a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project for the subject property. The Residential Infill Project application is needed to allow parking in a non - residential zoning district. The Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project application is needed to recognize the existing building with a new site plan that addresses various site development requirements such as parking, setbacks, and drainage. A minor lot adjustment will be prepared and processed if the requested Flexible Development Applications are approved. Residential Infill Project Application The portion of the subject property that is within the MHDR zoning district currently contains existing parking spaces. However, since subject property will essentially be a new lot with existing facilities, the proposed redesigned parking spaces in this portion of the property must be addressed through the Residential Infill Project application. In addition, no reduction of interior landscaping within the vehicular use area is needed. The code requires that 10% of the vehicular use are be landscaping. The proposed plan indicates that approximately 14.3% can be provided. The setback on this portion of the subject property from Betty Lane and Fredrica Avenue will comply with the city code setback requirement of 25 feet. Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project Application The portion of the subject property that is within the D zoning district currently contains an existing Utilities/Infrastructure Facility building and parking spaces. The Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project Application will essentially recognize the existing building with a new site plan that addresses parking layout, landscape plan, drainage, public facilities, etc. The existing building comprises 185,194 square feet. The subject property (both the MHDR and D portions of the property) can be designed to 1 accommodate 145 spaces. A parking study indicates that approximately 105 spaces are needed to accommodate the existing facility. A site plan submitted with these applications indicates: (1) the location of the 145 parking spaces; (2) a reduction in the amount of impervious surface; (3) increased radii of the access to the property to accommodate fire service vehicles; and (4) compliance with required setbacks. An equipment service area is indicated on the site plan. This area is needed for trucks to operate in order to service the existing switching equipment within the existing building. Currently, this area is 22.3 feet from the right of way for Betty Lane with no landscaping. This area is proposed to be redesigned to be 17.3' from the existing building to a proposed 5' landscape area on Betty Lane. Termination of Status of Nonconformity for Floor Area Ratio and Height per Section 6 -109 Due to the Downtown Redevelopment Plan (Plan) standards for the East Gateway District, the Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project Application also includes a request for Termination of Status of Nonconformity for Floor Area Ratio and Height per Section 6 -109 of the Community Development Code. Specifically, the maximum F.A.R. allowed in this district is .55 and the maximum height allowed is 50 feet. The existing F.A.R. is 1.29 and the proposed F.A.R. is 1.27. The existing height is 86 feet. No change to the existing building height is proposed. Summary of Requests 1. Flexible Development approval for the Termination of Status of Nonconformity for Floor Area Ratio (F.A.R. ) and for building height in the Downtown District (East Gateway Character District) under the provisions of Section 6 -109; 2. Permit the improvement of the existing site and parking areas for a Utilities/Infrastructure Facility use in the Downtown District as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project under the provisions of Section 2- 903.C; and 3. Permit Nonresidential Off - Street Parking in the Medium High Density Residential (MHDR) District with deviations to reduce the north setback (side) from 10 to 5 feet to pavement and to allow the placement of landscaping on the inside of the buffer fence along this north side of the property as a Residential Infill Project under the provisions of Section 2- 404.F. ORIGINAL RECEIVED MAR 0 7 2000 2 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER Date: 3/4/08 Revised Responses to Written Submittal Requirements (Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Proiect Criteria 1. The development or redevelopment is otherwise impractical without deviations from the use and/or development standards set forth in this zoning district. The existing Utilities/Infrastructure Facility building is non - conforming to the Downtown Redevelopment Plan East Gateway District standard for F.A.R. and height. As such, a deviation through the Termination of Status of Nonconformity is needed to recognize the existing F.A.R. and height and to allow the sale of the unused northern portion of the property for residential development consistent with the MHDR designation. The portion of the subject property that is within the D zoning district currently contains an existing Utilities /Infrastructure Facility building and existing parking spaces. The Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project Application will essentially recognize an existing building; provide a new parking layout; address other public facility concerns; and allow the sale of an unused portion of the property to the north. Z The development or redevelopment will be consistent with the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan, as well as with the general purpose, intent and basic planning objectives of this Code, and with the intent and purpose of this zoning district. This application proposes no additions to the existing Utilities /Infrastructure Facility building. However, this building is non - conforming to the Downtown Redevelopment Plan East Gateway District standard for F.A.R. and height. As such, a deviation through the Termination of Status of Nonconformity is needed to recognize the existing F.A.R. and height and to allow the sale of the unused northern portion of the property for residential development consistent with the MHDR designation. By allowing the existing project to remain along with improvements to the parking, buffering, landscaping, vehicular access, and pedestrian on the existing Verizon property, the residential infill project will not materially reduce the fair market value on abutting properties. 3. The development or redevelopment will not impede the normal and orderly development of surrounding properties. Approval of the application for a Residential Infill Project will allow the sale of the underutilized northern portion of the property to be resold for new residential development as well as improvements to the existing Verizon property described above. This potential new residential development will provide for a better transition of uses from the existing Utilities /Infrastructure Facility property to the existing residential area to the north. 4. Adjoining properties will not suffer substantial detriment as a result of the proposed development. Adjoining properties will not suffer substantial detriment because this application will allow for potential development of adjacent land which will likely increase property values in the area. The proposed site plan removes parking from the right of way and will provide additional lanja ing. RECEIVED 1 MAR 07 2000 PLANNING DEPARTMENT 5. The proposed use shall otherwise be permitted by the underlying future land use category, be compatible with adjacent land uses, will not substantially alter the essential use characteristics of the neighborhood; and shall demonstrate compliance with one or more of the following objectives: a. The proposed use is permitted in this zoning district as a minimum standard, flexible standard or flexible development use, b. The proposed use would be a significant economic contributor to the City's economic base by diversifying the local economy or by creating jobs; C. The development proposal accommodates the expansion or redevelopment of an existing economic contributor, d. The proposed use provides for the provision of affordable housing; e. The proposed use provides for development or redevelopment in an area that is characterized by other similar development and where a land use plan amendment and rezoning would result in a spot land use or zoning designation; or f. The proposed use provides for the development of a new and/or preservation of a working waterfront use. The existing Utilities /Infrastructure Facility is listed in the Downtown District as a Level 1, Flexible Standard Development (FLS) use. This application will recognize the existing Utilities /Infrastructure Facility in its present size and height in order to allow for the sale of the unused northern portion of the property for residential development. The improvements to the existing use parking area, landscaping, access, pedestrian circulation, etc. represents a redevelopment of the existing economic contributor and the residential northern portion of the property provides redevelopment of a potential economic contributor: 6. Flexibility with regard to use, lot width, required setbacks, height and off - street parking are justified based on demonstrated compliance with all of the following design objectives: a. The proposed development will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of the surrounding properties for uses permitted in this zoning district, b. The proposed development complies with applicable design guidelines adopted by the City; C. The design, scale and intensity of the proposed development supports the established or emerging character of an area; d. In order to form a cohesive, visually interesting and attractive appearance, the proposed development incorporates a substantial number of the following design elements: • Changes in horizontal building planes; • Use of architectural details such as columns, cornices, stringcourses, pilasters, porticos, balconies, railings, awnings, etc.; • Variety in materials, colors and textures; • Distinctive fenestration patterns; • Building stepbacks; and • Distinctive roofs forms. e. The proposed development provides for appropriate buffers, enhanced landscape design and appropriate distances between buildings. Approval of this application request will allow the sale of unused property to the north for other development consistent with consistent with the CBD Plan designation and medium high density residential (NMR) zoning. The remaining property is the subject of this application and will remain in its current Utilities /Infrastructure Facility use. ORIGINAL RECEIVED 2 MAR 07 2000 PLANNING DEPARTMENT /'l1N nF rl FARINATFR The revised site plan will provide for improvements to the existing Utilities /Infrastructure Facility site, such as removing parking from the right of way; providing additional landscaping and buffering; improving handicap access to the existing building; relocating dumpsters away from Betty Lane; providing new driveways that comply with code; and removing an existing one story building to provide a more efficient parking area. In addition, the new parking layout will reduce pedestrian/vehicle conflicts by repairing sidewalks and providing improved handicap access to the existing building. The property currently contains existing parking spaces and multiple driveway entries. The redesigned parking lot will provide increased radii for the driveways into the property to accommodate fire service vehicles; new landscaping that will comply with code; reduced impervious surface; and elimination of parking spaces that back into public right of way and/or impede fire exits. ORIGINAL RECFIUFD 3 MAR 07 2000 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER ORIGINAL RECEIVED Date: 3/4/08 MAR 07 2009 Responses to Revised Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project Application, PLANNING DEPARTMENT General Applicability Criteria (Code Section 3- 913.A) CITY OF CLEARWATER 1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. The subject of this application is a 3.3 acre parcel containing an existing Utilities /Infrastructure Facility. Approval of this application request will allow the sale of unused property to the north for other development consistent with consistent with the CBD Plan designation and medium high density residential (MHDR) zoning. The remaining property, Verizon Site, is the subject of this application and will remain in its current Utilities /Infrastructure Facility use. The existing Utilities /Infrastructure Facility building is non - conforming to the East Gateway District of the Downtown Redevelopment Plan standard for F.A.R. and height. The maximum F.A.R. allowed in this district is .55 and the maximum height allowed is 50 feet. The existing F.A.R. is 1.29 and the proposed F.A.R. is 1.27. The existing height is 86 feet. Therefore, as part of this application, a request for a Termination of Status of Nonconformity for Floor Area Ratio and Height is included. It should be noted that the original building was put into service in 1954 with several additions to the original buildings in 1967, 1970 and 1974 all of which predates the Downtown Redevelopment Plan East Gateway District requirements. In addition, the revised site plan will provide for improvements to the Verizon Site such as removing parking from the right of way; providing additional landscaping and buffering; improving handicap access to the existing building; relocating dumpsters away from Betty Lane; providing new driveways that comply with code; and removing an existing one story building to provide a more efficient parking area. This application proposes no new development. 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. Approval of this application request will allow the sale of unused property to the north for other development consistent with consistent with the CBD Plan designation and medium high density residential (MHDR) zoning. This will allow for potential development of adjacent underutilized land which will likely increase property values in the area. 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety or persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use. As stated in #1 above, the revised site plan will provide for improvements to the site such as removing parking from the right of way; providing additional landscaping and buffering; relocating dumpsters away from Betty Lane; providing new driveways that comply with code; and removing an existing one story building to provide a more efficient parking area. In addition, the new parking layout will reduce pedestrian/vehicle conflicts by repairing sidewalks and providing improved handicap access to the existing building. 1 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. No building area is being added therefore there is no change in the existing site traffic generation. The existing driveways will be realigned to improve vehicular access while providing better access for the Fire Department; parking in the right of way will be removed; and pedestrian and handicapped access will be improved. S. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. The existing building is nonconforming to the Gateway District of the Downtown Redevelopment Plan standard for F.A.R. and height, and a request for Termination of Status of Nonconformity is included with this application. The Utilities /Infrastructure Facility use occupies the southern portion of the block and generally abuts other commercial and non - residential uses on the west, south and east sides of the property except for a residential parcel on Fredrica Avenue. The proposed site plan is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity by providing for buffering that currently does not exist adjacent to the vacant MHDR zoned property to the north and existing residential use to the east; and, as stated in 4 above, traffic congestion and conflict will be improved by removing parking in the right of way and improving pedestrian circulation. 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts, on adjacent properties. As stated in the above responses, the new site plan provides for additional landscaping and buffering; relocates entries that meet code requirements for vehicular as well as emergency vehicles; removes unsafe parking spaces; and provides improved pedestrian and handicap access —all of which will minimize any adverse effects of the existing building and use on adjacent properties. ORIGINAL. RECEIVED 2 MAR 07 2000 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER Date: 3/4/08 ORIGINAL. RECEIVED MAR 0 7 2000 Responses to Requirements for Termination of Status of Nonconformity for Floor ArA& E rP RT Height per Section 6 -109 of the Community Development Code. A. A nonconforming use or structure may be deemed to be in conformity with this development code, and may thereafter be allowed to continue and to expand as a lawfully existing use or structure, if such use or structure is granted level two approval in accordance with the provisions of this section. This request for Termination of Status of Nonconformity is included with a Flexible Development Application for Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project Application. The subject of this application is a 3.3 acre parcel (with an existing Utilities /Infrastructure Facility building) that will be created to allow the sale of unused property to its north. This application proposes no new development. Generally, the northern portion of the 3.3 acre parcel is zoned MHDR and southern portion is zoned D. The southern portion contains the existing building and most of the parking lot; the northern portion contains a small portion of the parking lot and a retention pond. The existing building is non - conforming to the Downtown Redevelopment Plan East Gateway District standard for F.A.R. and height. The maximum F.A.R. allowed in this district is .55 and the maximum height allowed is 50 feet. The property has an existing F.A.R. of 1.29 and is proposed to have an F.A.R. of 1.27. The existing building height is 86 feet with no additions proposed. The original building was put into service in 1954 with several additions to the original buildings in 1967, 1970 and 1974 all of which predates the Downtown Redevelopment Plan East Gateway District requirements. B. A structure which is nonconforming with respect to density may be reconstructed on the same parcel with the same density provided Level Two approval is obtained and that: 1. Such reconstruction complies with all other requirements of this Community Development Code, and 2. Such reconstruction does not constitute a change in use. The request is for an existing Utilities /Infrastructure Facility building as described in A. above. C A level two approval shall not be granted to terminate status as a nonconforming use or structure unless the nonconformity is improved according to the following requirements: 1. Perimeter buffers conforming to the requirements of section 3- 1202(C) shall be installed. 2. Off - street parking lots shall be improved to meet the landscaping standards established in section 3- 1202(D). 3. Any nonconforming sign, outdoor lighting or other accessory structure or accessory use located on the lot shall be terminated, removed or brought into conformity with this development code. 4. The comprehensive landscaping and comprehensive sign programs may be used to satisfy the requirements of this section. Proposed buffers will comply with Section 3- 1202(c). In "D" portion, no buffers are required. However, in the D portion of the site, an equipment service area is indicated on the site plan. This area is needed for trucks to operate in order to service the existing switching equipment within the existing building. A 5 -foot landscape screening area is provided to screen this equipment service area from Betty Lane. 1 In the MHDR portion of the property, the following buffers are provided: 1) 25' setback with landscaping on Betty Lane 2) 25' setback with landscaping on Fredrica Avenue 3) 5' landscape buffer on the north property line abutting the parcel to be sold of with 6" curbing around and wheel stops 4) A solid 4' fence between the existing residential lot and the retention pond on Fredrica Avenue The existing parking area will be improved by removing parking from the right of way; providing additional landscaping and buffering around the parking area; relocating dumpsters away from Betty Lane; providing new driveways that comply with code; and providing a new parking layout that will reduce pedestrian/vehicle conflicts by repairing sidewalks and providing improved handicap access to the existing building. In addition, an existing one story building will be removed to provide a more efficient parking area. No changes are proposed to the existing signage. A landscape plan is included with this request. ORIGINAL RECEWD 2 MAR 0 7 2000 ,'LANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER 'Clearwater 0 Planning Department 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, Florida 33756 Telephone: 727- 562 -4567 Fax: 727 - 562 -4865 ❑ SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION ❑ SUBMIT 14 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION -Plans and application are required to be collated, stapled, and folded into sets ❑ SUBMIT FIRE PRELIMARY SITE PLAN: $200.00 ❑ SUBMIT APPLICATION FEE $ CASE #: RECEIVED BY (staff initials): DATE RECEIVED: * NOTE: 15 TOTAL SETS OF INFORMATION REQUIRED (APPLICATIONS PLUS SITE PLAN SETS) ORIGINAL RECEIVED MAR 07 2000 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION Residential Infill Project (Revised 04/24/2007) PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT- A. APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4- 202.A) APPLICANT NAME: DOUg Dale, Verizon Corporate Real Estate MAILING ADDRESS: 2200 W. Airfield Drive, Dock E MC: HQD _ 01 D76, DFW Ai PHONE NUMBER: 972.615.4039 FAX NUMBER: CELL NUMBER: 21 4.437.7119 EMAIL: PROPERTY OWNER(S): List ALL owners on the deed AGENT NAME: MAILING ADDRESS: PHONE NUMBER: CELL NUMBER: IGTE Florida, Inc., c/o Property Tax Section General Telephone Company of Florida James H. Shimberg, Jr., Holland & Knight LLP 100 N. Tampa Street, Suite 4100, Tampa, FL 33602 -3644 813.227.6412 FAX NUMBER: 813, 314.5108 813.293.1912 EMAIL: jim.shimberq @hkl B. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4- 202.A) PROJECT NAME: STREET ADDRESS PARCEL NUMBER(S): PARCEL SIZE (acres): LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Verizon Office TX .com PROJECT VALUATION: $300,000.00 Izbu cleveland Street, Clearwater 15- 29 -15- 26658- 000 -0010, 15- 29 -15- 65250 - 002 -0010, see below 3.33 acres PARCEL SIZE (square feet): 145,1 35 15- 29 -15- 12276 - 003 -0010 and 15- 29 -15- 12276 - 003 -0130 PROPOSED USE(S): No new uses proposed DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST: Retain existing 185, 194 square feet Of . Utilities /Infras Specifically identify the request Facility use and create new vacant lot; (include number of units or square a OW non -resl eri la par lrig lri zone por lOri O footage of non - residential use and all requested code deviations; e.g. 15-29-1 -65 50- - reduction in required number of _ parking spaces, specific use, etc.) uumenss ana aemngstaereK .terguson \Desktop\planningforms _0707 \Residential Infill Project (FLD) 04- 24.07.doc Pagel of 8 DOES THIS APPLICATION INVOLVE THE TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS (TDR), A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, OR A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED (CERTIFIED) SITE PLAN? YES _ NO _ (if yes, attach a copy of the applicable documents) C. PROOF OF OWNERSHIP: (Code Section 4- 202.A.5) ❑ SUBMIT A COPY OF THE TITLE INSURANCE POLICY, DEED TO THE PROPERTY OR SIGN AFFIDAVIT ATTESTING OWNERSHIP (see page 7) D. WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 3- 913.A) ❑ Provide complete responses to the six (6) GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA — Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail: 1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. See attached 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. See attached. 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety or persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use. See attached. 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. See attached. 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. See attached. 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts, on adjacent properties. ORIGINAL See attached. RECEIVED ............ .._... _.._....._..._..._....._..._....__._.._....................._..................._._..........._....._......._.._._.........._....--..._._..___..._......_...............-.............__...._._.............._.__........._...__............_...-......._.........................._.._.........._....___._.__...__.... .....- MAR- .QT.2009-- ._.... - ...._........._.._._. _.._..._ .............. _.. --... ...................._..._._.... ..................... .... _.._I ....... ..... __ ...... -- - _._. ...... - -- P - ---._.._..---- I......._._......_...._._.. ._.. -- ..._._..- -. _...._- .._._ .......... _........ LANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER SAPlanning Department\Applicalion Forms \Development Review\2007 Forms \Residential Infill Project (FLD) 04.24- 07.doc Page 2 of 8 WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Residential Infill Project Criteria) ❑ Provide complete responses to the seven (7) RESIDENTIAL INFILL PROJECT CRITERIA – Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail: The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development is otherwise impractical without deviations from the intensity and development standards. INAI See attached. ORI� REMIED - ... ..... ........... --...-........... _,......_._....._.._.. - -- - ---__........ _.._...__-._._.._.._._._... _.__.._.. - .._.. --_ .................. _. ............. - .... - -- ---- ._..---AAR__Q..._�� ..... -- --------- -.._ -- - - - - - -_ __.._---- -_ —_ -� _ __ - - -, UMING-D1:PARTMENI CITY OF CLEARWATfR 2. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a residential infill project will not materially reduce the fair market value o abutting properties. (Include the existing value of the site and the proposed value of the site with the improvements.) S.e e.......a.t.ta ch. e. d..,....._ ........ .... ..... ................................... ........._.._....._.... __ ........ _ ... _.........._. .......................... _........_. .......... --- ...... ............ _.. .... - ............ -..... ............. _ ....... . .......... . ..... ._.... ............ _ .............. . ........... - ... .... - .... _ ... _ ............ _ ........................ I............ 3. The uses within the residential infill project are otherwise permitted in the City of Clearwater. See attached. 4. The uses or mix of use within the residential infill project are compatible with adjacent land uses. See attached. 5. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a residential infill project will upgrade the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. See attached. 6. The design of the proposed residential infill project creates a form and function that enhances the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. See attached. 7. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height and off - street parking are justified by the benefits to community character and the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. See attached. SAPlanning DepartmentWpplication Forms \Development Reviewt2007 FormslResidential Infill Project (FLD) 04- 24- 07.doc Page 3 of 8 E. STORMWATER PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteria Manual and 4- 202.A.21) ❑ A STORMWATER NARRATIVE MUST BE SUBMITTED WITH ALL APPLICATIONS. All applications that involve addition or modification of impervious surface, including buildings, must include a stormwater plan that demonstrates compliance with the City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteria manual. A reduction in impervious surface area does not qualify as an exemption to this requirement. ❑ If a plan is not required, the narrative shall provide an explanation as to why the site is exempt. ❑ At a minimum, the STORMWATER PLAN shall include the following ❑ Existing topography extending 50 feet beyond all property lines; ❑ Proposed grading including finished floor elevations of all structures; ❑ All adjacent streets and municipal storm systems; ❑ Proposed stormwater detention /retention area including top of bank, toe of slope and outlet control structure; ❑ A narrative describing the proposed stormwater control plan including all calculations and data necessary to demonstrate compliance with the City manual. . ❑ Proposed stormwater detention /retention area including top of bank, toe of slope and outlet control structure; ❑ Signature and seal of Florida Registered Professional Engineer on all plans and calculations. ❑ COPY OF PERMIT INQUIRY LETTER OR SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT (SWFWMD) PERMIT SUBMITTAL (SWFWMD approval is required prior to issuance of City Building Permit), if applicable ❑ ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF STORMWATER PLAN REQUIREMENTS (Applicant must initial one of the following): Stormwater plan as noted above is included water plan is not required and explanation narrative is attached. At a minimum, a grading plan and finished floor elevations shall be provided. CAUTION — IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A STORMWATER PLAN AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 562 -4750. F. SUPPLEMENTAL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 4- 202.A) ❑ SIGNED AND SEALED SURVEY (including legal description of property) — One original and 14 copies; ❑ TREE SURVEY (including existing trees on site and within 25' of the adjacent site, by species, size (DBH 4" or greater), and location, including drip lines and indicating trees to be removed) — please design around the existing trees; ❑ TREE INVENTORY; prepared by a "certified arborist ", of all trees 4" DBH or greater, reflecting size, canopy (drip lines) and condition of such trees; ❑ LOCATION MAP OF THE PROPERTY; ❑ PARKING DEMAND STUDY in conjunction with a request to make deviations to the parking standards (ie. Reduce number of spaces). Prior to the submittal of this application, the methodology of such study shall be approved by the Community Development Coordinator and shall be in accordance with accepted traffic engineering principles. The findings of the study will be used in determining whether or not deviations to the parking standards are approved; ❑ GRADING PLAN, as applicable; ❑ PRELIMINARY PLAT, as required (Note: Building permits will not be issued until evidence of recording a final plat is provided); ❑ COPY OF RECORDED PLAT, as applicable; ORIGINAL RECEIVED C: \Documents and Settings \derek.ferguson\ Desktop \planningforms_0707\Residential Infll Project (FLD) 04- 24- 07.doc MAR 0 7 2000 Page 4 of 8 PLANNING DEPAR CITY OF CL EARWATER ATCR G. SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4- 202.A) LJ SITE PLAN with the following information (not to exceed 24" x 36 "): Index sheet referencing individual sheets included in package; North arrow; Engineering bar scale (minimum scale one inch equals 50 feet), and date prepared; All dimensions; Footprint and size of all EXISTING buildings and structures; Footprint and size of all PROPOSED buildings and structures; All required setbacks; All existing and proposed points of access; All required sight triangles; Identification of environmentally unique areas, such as watercourses, wetlands, tree masses, and specimen trees, including _ description and location of understory, ground cover vegetation and wildlife habitats, etc; Location of all public and private easements; Location of all street rights -of -way within and adjacent to the site; Location of existing public and private utilities, including fire hydrants, storm and sanitary sewer lines, manholes and lift stations, gas and water lines; All parking spaces, driveways, loading areas and vehicular use areas; Depiction by shading or crosshatching of all required parking lot interior landscaped areas; Location of all solid waste containers, recycling or trash handling areas and outside mechanical equipment and all required screening {per Section 3- 201(D)(i) and Index #7011; Location of all landscape material; Location of all onsite and offsite storm -water management facilities; Location of all outdoor lighting fixtures; and Location of all existing and proposed sidewalks. O SITE DATA TABLE for existing, required, and proposed development, in written /tabular form: Existing 185,194 SF Utilities /Infrastructure Facility. No Change. EXISTING REQUIRED PROPOSED 19 19 Land area in square feet and acres; Number of EXISTING dwelling units; Number of PROPOSED dwelling units; Gross floor area devoted to each use; Parking spaces: total number, presented in tabular form with the number of required spaces; Total paved area, including all paved parking spaces & driveways, expressed in square feet & percentage of the paved vehicular area; Official records book and page numbers of all existing utility _ easement; Building and structure heights; Impermeable surface ratio (I.S.R.); and Floor area ratio (F.A.R.) for all nonresidential uses. REDUCED COLOR SITE PLAN to scale (8 % X 11); FOR DEVELOPMENTS OVER ONE ACRE, provide the following additional information on site plan: One -foot contours or spot elevations on site; Offsite elevations if required to evaluate the proposed stormwater management for the parcel; _ All open space areas; Location of all earth or water retaining walls and earth berms; _ Lot lines and building lines (dimensioned); Streets and drives (dimensioned); Building and structural setbacks (dimensioned); Structural overhangs; ORIGINAL RECEIVED MAR 07 2008 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER CADocuments and Settings \derek. Ferguson \Desktop\planningforms_0707 \Residential Infill Project (FLD) 04- 24 -07.doc Page 5 of 8 H. LANDSCAPING PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4- 1102.A) ORIGINAL. ❑ LANDSCAPE PLAN with the following information (not to exceed 24" x 36 "): krceiwb All existing and proposed structures; MAR 07 2000 Names of abutting streets; _ Drainage and retention areas including swales, side slopes and bottom elevations; PLANNING DEPARTMENT Delineation and dimensions of all required perimeter landscape buffers; CITY OF CLEARWATER Sight visibility triangles; Delineation and dimensions of all parking areas including landscaping islands and curbing; Existing trees on -site and immediately adjacent to the site, by species, size and locations, including driplines (as indicated on required _ tree survey); Location, size, and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, indicated by a key relating to the plant schedule; Plant schedule with a key (symbol or label) indicating the size, description, specifications, quantities, and spacing requirements of all existing and proposed landscape materials, including botanical and common names; Typical planting details for trees, palms, shrubs and ground cover plants including instructions, soil mixes, backfilling, mulching and protective measures; Interior landscaping areas hatched and /or shaded and labeled and interior landscape coverage, expressing in both square feet and percentage covered; Conditions of a previous development approval (e.g. conditions imposed by the Community Development Board); Irrigation notes. ❑ REDUCED COLOR LANDSCAPE PLAN to scale (8'/2 X 11); ❑ COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM application, as applicable. Landscape associated with the Comprehensive Landscape Program shall exceed minimum Code requirements to offset the areas where minimum Code will not be met. I. BUILDING ELEVATION PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4- 202.A.23) ❑ BUILDING ELEVATION DRAWINGS — with the following information; All sides of all buildings; Dimensioned; Colors (provide one full sized set of colored elevations); Materials; ❑ REDUCED BUILDING ELEVATIONS — same as above to scale on 8' /s X 11. J. SIGNAGE: (Division 19. SIGNS / Section 3 -1806) ❑ All EXISTING freestanding and attached signs; Provide photographs and dimensions (area, height, etc.), indicate whether they will be removed or to remain. ❑ All PROPOSED freestanding and attached signs; Provide details including location, size, height, colors, materials and drawing; freestanding signs shall include the street address (numerals) ❑ Comprehensive Sign Program application, as applicable (separate application and fee required). ❑ Reduced signage proposal (8 %2 X 11) (color), if submitting Comprehensive Sign Program application. CADocuments and Settings \derek.ferguson\ Desktop \planningforms_0707 \Residential Infill Project (FLD) 04- 24- 07.doc Page 6 of 8 WKI 111^6 K. TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY: (Section 4202.A.13 and 4801.C) RECEPAD L] Include if required by the Traffic Operations Manager or his /her designee or if the proposed development: MAR 07 2000 Will degrade the acceptable level of service for any roadway as adopted in the Comprehensive Plan. PLANNING DEPARTMENT Will generate 100 or more new vehicle directional trips per hour and /or 1000 or more new vehicle trips per GM OF CLEARWATER Will affect a nearby roadway segment and /or intersection with five (5) reportable accidents within the prior twelve (12) month period or that is on the City's annual list of most hazardous intersections. Trip generation shall be based on the most recent edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineer's (ITE) Trip General Manual. The Traffic Impact Study must be prepared in accordance with a "Scoping Meeting" held with the Traffic Operations Manager and the Planning Department's Development Review Manager or their designee (727 - 562 -4750) Refer to Section 4 -801 C of the Community Development Code for exceptions to this requirement. D Acknowledgement of traffic impact study requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following): Traffic Impact Study is included. The study must include a summary table of pre- and postclevelopment levels of service for all _ roadway legs and each turning movement at all intersections identified in the Scoping Meeting. Traffic Impact Study is not required. CAUTION — IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 562- 4750. L. FIRE FLOW CALCULATIONS/ WATER STUDY: Provide Fire Flow Calculations. Water Study by a FIRE PROTECTION ENGINEER to assure an adequate water supply is available and to determine if any upgrades are required by the developer due to the impact of this project. The water supply must be able to support the needs of any required fire sprinkler, standpipe and /or fire pump. If a fire pump is required the water supply must be able to supply 150% of its rated capacity. Compliance with the 2004 Florida Fire Prevention Code to include NFPA 13, MFPA 14, NFPA 20, NFPA 291, and MFPA 1142 (Annex H) is required. 0 Acknowledgement of fire flow calculations /water study requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following): U&;��7ire Fire Flow Calculations/Water Study is included. Flow Calculations/Water Study is not required. CAUTION — IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A FIRE FLOW CALCULATIONS/ WATER STUDY AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Fire Prevention Department at (727) 562 -4334. M. SIGNATURE: I, the undersigned, acknowledge that all representations made in this application are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge and authorize City representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application. of STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS Sworn to and subscribed before me this day of S,%t CMVe -r- , A.D. 20 to me and /or by who is personally known has produced PP!r ckx) a.11r 4 k hpw>4 oe irlcn4ifiro� -' �_ TERRI ANNE VERTES Notary public, My commission expires: -7'' •...•d% EXPIRES: December 17, 2009 '+%pg c Bonded Thru Notary Public Underwriters Pa .ae 6 of 7 N. AFFIDAVIT TO AUTHORIZE AGENT: 1. Provide names of all property owners on deed — PRINT full names: ORIGINAL REOEIVFD General Telephone Company of Florid __ .. _ _ _ __.a PLANNING DEPARTMEN i.. pE..0 LEAR1 [VATER............. ....... .. 2. That (I am /we are) the owner(s) and record title holder(s) of the following described property (address or general location): 3.3. 755- ........... ................. ........... ..... ............. .._...._._ ................___..__..__.___ 3. That this property constitutes the property for which a request for a: (describe request) Flexible Development Application (Residential Infill Project) and Flexible Development Application (Comprehensive Znfill- Redevelopment 4. That the undersigned (has/have) appointed and (does /do) appoint: James H. Shimberg, Jr., Holland & Knight ___ ...... _. ___... ,,_..._. __- . ...._.......___.._.__ �`ampa, mmFTorida as (his /their) agent(s) to execute any petitions or other documents necessary to affect such petition; 5. That this affidavit has been executed to induce the City of Clearwater, Florida to consider and act on the above described property; 8. That site visits to the property are necessary by City representatives in order to process this application and the owner authorizes City representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application; 7. That (1 1we), the undersigned authority, hereby certify that the foregoing is true and correct. Pro perty Owner Property O er ............ .- ........................................ _.._._......__.._- Property Owner _ .,,,_ .. .......... ......... Property Owner 16 _ ...__. ti t4 STATE OF �e1`� -q b�CZ vipzo COUNTY OF S i�1� F�CS,�1o� L IrC_ —FES�as Before me the undersigned, an officer duly commissioned by the laws of the State of r#a, on this S day of personally appeared ©"A(�w , (� who having been first duly sworn Deposes and says that he ?she fully understands the contents of the affidavit that he /she signed. O��Y PV6 Cherie K Rudolph Feasley y My Commission Expires y ,oF v 11/14/2009 Notary Public Signature Notary Seal/Stamp My Commission . Expires: (�' `-E'o1v0 CADocuments and Settingslderek. ferguson\Desktoptplanningforrns 0707tFlexible Standard Development (F!S) 04- 24�07.doc Page 7 of 7 This Document Prepared by: Mary W. Clark, Senior Paralegal Verizon — HQE03H08 600 Hidden Ridge - Irving, TX 75038 Return to: VERIZON FLORIDA LLC AFFIDAVIT OF CORPORATE SUCCESSION TO TITLE FROM VARIOUS ENTITIES, INCLUDING: VERIZON FLORIDA INC. GTE FLORIDA INCORPORATED GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY OF FLORIDA PENINSULAR TELEPHONE COMPANY MAR 0 3 2008 BY-------------------- a:. MAR 0 7 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER The Affiant, after being duly sworn and deposed, makes this affidavit to identify and explain the corporate succession to title from various owners of record for property located in the state of FLORIDA. Peninsular Telephone Company changed its name to General Telephone Company of Florida, effective March 26, 1958. General Telephone Company of Florida changed its name to GTE Florida Incorporated, effective January 1, 1988. 3. GTE Florida Incorporated changed its name to Verizon Florida Inc., effective June 30, 2000. 4. Verizon Florida Inc. converted to a Florida limited liability company and became Verizon Florida LLC effective November 15, 2006. Dated: February 21, 2008 VERIZON FLORIDA LLC By: Ro alynn ahristian, Assistant Secretary STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF DALLAS I, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for said County, in said State, hereby certify that Rosalynn Christian, whose name as Assistant Secretary of Verizon Florida LLC, a Florida limited liability company, is signed to the foregoing Affidavit, and who is known to me, acknowledged before me on this day, that she, as such officer, with full authority, executed the same voluntarily for and as the act of said limited liability company. Given under my hand and official seal this 21St day of February, 2008. 1tlttln MARY CLAIK • E Notary Public. State of Tomas My Commission Expires 18-22 -8e AFFID -corp succ -vfl ' Y 01,41 1 NOTARY P LIC Mary Clark, to of Texas MAR 07 2000 ASSISTANT SECRETARY'S CERTIFICATE PLANNING DEPARTMENT CRY OF CLEARWATER I, Rosalynn Christian, a duly appointed and qualified Assistant Secretary of Verizon Florida LLC (the "Company "), do hereby certify that: 1. On July 19, 2002, the Company adopted Corporate Policy Statement 103 (CPS - 103) "Authority to Approve Transactions," as it may be amended from time to time, effective June 1, 2002; and 2. John Terpin, Director -Real Estate Operations, or Douglas M. Dale, Manager - Transactions, are authorized, pursuant to the signing authorities adopted by the aforementioned resolution and a duly authorized delegation of authority, to make, enter into, and sign agreements and documents, related to real estate located on 1280 Cleveland St., Pinellas County, Clearwater, Florida on behalf of the Company. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have signed this certificate and affixed the seal of the Company this 21 st day of February, 2008. 1!VO 0�4�F�� QEAL 0 1901 IW,6WrA&�_ I/ Rosal nn ClUristian Assistant Secretary Date: 3/4/08 Responses to Revised Residential Infill Project Application, MAR 07 2000 General Applicability Criteria (Code Section 3- 913.A) PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER 1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. The subject of this application is a portion of a 3.3 acre parcel (containing an existing Utilities /Infrastructure Facility) that will be created to allow the sale of unused property to its north. This northern portion of the 3.3 acre parcel is zoned MHDR and contains a retention pond and a small portion of a larger parking lot which serves the existing Utilities /Infrastructure Facility on the southern portion which is zoned D. The portion of the subject property that is within the MHDR zoning district and is the subject of this Residential Infill Project Application currently contains existing parking spaces. However, since this property is a portion of a new parking lot, the parking spaces on this portion of the property required a request to permit Nonresidential Off - Street Parking in the MHDR District with deviations to reduce the side (north) setback from 10 feet to 5 feet (to pavement) and to allow the placement of landscaping on the inside of the buffer fence along this north side as a Residential Infill Project. This property is part of a new site plan that includes the D zoned portion of the property to south. 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. The setbacks on the east and west sides of the MHDR portion of the subject property on Betty Lane and Fredrica Avenue will comply with the city code setback requirement of 25 feet. There will be no reduction of the interior landscaping within the overall vehicular use area, and, in fact, there will be more landscaping provided than required. The code requires that 10% of the vehicular use be landscaping. The proposed plan indicates that approximately 14.3% can be provided. Further, by incorporating the MHDR portion of the property into the overall redesign of the parking area serving the Utilities /Infrastructure . Facility which includes improvements to the overall parking layout, buffering, landscaping, vehicular access, and pedestrian access, the Residential Infill Project will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value of adjacent properties. 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety or persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use. As stated above, the MHDR portion of the property is incorporated into the revised site plan and will provide for improvements to the site such as removing parking from the right of way; providing additional landscaping and buffering; relocating dumpsters away from Betty Lane; providing new driveways that comply with code; and removing an existing one story building to provide a more efficient parking area. In addition, the new parking layout will reduce pedestrian/vehicle conflicts by repairing sidewalks and providing improved handicap access to the existing building. 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. As stated above, the MHDR portion of the property is part of an overall new site development plan that incorporates the existing Utilities /Infrastructure Facility use into a new parking lot. No building area is being added therefore there is no change in the existing site traffic generation. The existing driveways will be realigned to improve vehicular access while providing better access for the Fire Department; parking in the right of way will be removed; and pedestrian and handicapped access will be improved. 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. The parking spaces in the MHDR portion of the subject property will be part of a new parking lot to accommodate the existing utility facility. The MHDR portion of the property will meet the setback requirements on Betty Lane and Fredrica Avenue. Adjacent to the MHDR portion of the site to the north is a vacant parcel that will be sold for new development. The new site plan will provide 5 feet of landscaping with a fence along the northern portion of this parcel. As such, the Residential Infill Project will be consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity. 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts, on adjacent properties. As stated in the above responses, the new site plan provides for additional landscaping and buffering; relocates entries that meet code requirements for vehicular as well as emergency vehicles; removes unsafe parking spaces; and provides improved pedestrian and handicap access —all of which will minimize any adverse effects of the existing building and use on adjacent properties. ORIGINAL RECEIVED MAR 07 2000 PLANNING DEPARTMENT 2 C17Y CP CLEARWATER Date: 3/4/08 Revised Responses to Written Submittal Requirements (Residential Infill Project Criteria) 1. The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development is otherwise impractical without deviations from the intensity and development standards. The subject of this application is a portion of a 3.3 acre parcel (containing an existing Utilities/Infrastructure Facility) that will be created to allow the sale of unused property to its north. This northern portion of the 3.3 acre parcel is zoned MHDR and contains a retention pond and a small portion of a larger parking lot which serves the existing Utilities /Infrastructure Facility on the southern portion which is zoned D. The portion of the subject property that is within the MHDR zoning district currently contains existing parking spaces. However, since this property is a portion of a new parking lot, the parking spaces on this portion of the property required a request to permit Nonresidential Off - Street Parking in the MHDR District with deviations to reduce the side (north) setback from 10 feet to 5 feet (to pavement) and to allow the placement of landscaping on the inside of the buffer fence along this north side as a Residential Infill Project. 2. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a residential infill project will not materially reduce the fair market value of abutting properties. The setbacks on the east and west sides of the MHDR portion of the subject property on Betty Lane and Fredrica Avenue will comply with the city code setback requirement of 25 feet. There will be no reduction of the interior landscaping within the overall vehicular use area, and, in fact, there will be more landscaping provided than required. The code requires that 10% of the vehicular use be landscaping. The proposed plan indicates that approximately 14.3% can be provided. By incorporating the MHDR portion of the property into the overall redesign of the parking area serving the Utilities /Infrastructure Facility which includes improvements to the overall parking layout, buffering, landscaping, vehicular access, and pedestrian access, the Residential Infill Project will not materially reduce the fair market value on abutting properties. 3. The uses within the residential infill project are otherwise permitted in the City of Clearwater. The Off - Street Parking in the MHDR District, with deviations to reduce the side (north) setback from 10 feet to 5 feet (to pavement) and to allow the placement of landscaping on the inside of the buffer fence along the north side, can be permitted as a Residential Infill Project. 4. The uses or mix of use within the residential infill project are compatible with adjacent land uses. The parking spaces in the MHDR portion of the subject property will be part of a new parking lot to accommodate the existing utility facility. ORIGINAL RECEIVER MAR 07 2000 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER 5. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a residential infill project will upgrade the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. As stated in Response #2 above, the MHDR portion of the property will be incorporated into the overall redesign of the parking area serving the Utilities /Infrastructure Facility. This new design includes improvements to the overall parking layout, buffering, landscaping, vehicular access, and pedestrian access. The MHDR portion of the property will meet the setback requirements on Betty Lane and Fredrica Avenue, and will provide 5 feet of landscaping with a fence along the northern portion of this parcel. As such, the Residential Infill Project will provide for an upgrade to the immediate vicinity. 6. The design of the proposed residential infill project creates a form and function that enhances the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. As stated above, the MHDR portion of the property will be incorporated into the overall redesign of the parking area serving the Utilities /Infrastructure Facility. The MHDR property currently contains existing parking spaces. The overall property contains existing parking and multiple driveway entries. The redesigned parking lot will provide increased radii for the driveways into the property to accommodate fire service vehicles as well as landscaping that will comply with code. In addition, a 4 foot fence will be provided in the MHDR portion of the property on the south side of the existing retention pond abutting the existing residential parcel. 7. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height and off - street parking are justified by the benefits to community character and the immediate vicinity of the parcels proposed for development and City of Clearwater as a whole. As stated above, the setbacks on the east and west sides of the MHDR portion of the subject property on Betty Lane and Fredrica Avenue will comply with the city code setback requirement of 25 feet. There will be no reduction of the interior landscaping within the overall vehicular use area, and, in fact, there will be more landscaping provided than required. The code requires that 10% of the vehicular use be landscaping. The proposed plan indicates that approximately 14.3% can be provided. ORIGINAL RECEIVED 2 MAR 07 2000 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CRY OF CLEARWATER t ANDERSON LESNIAK LIMITED, INC. - 'landscape architecture land planning 4921 SOUTH WESTSHORE BLVD. TAMPA, FLORIDA 33611 (813) 831 -9595 FAX 831 -5485 anderson.lesnlak @ vedzon.net F- U) 0 z Q J W W J U L AMY$ IJ�T, ; kSLA ,-AS ©091 x'63 0 _4--- POLE RE CATON A! FREDRICA AVENUE ++ -4. Or 1W 30* so' o"M 1��W!A� 6. gERrCAL HVNblC RTDp C" "".1 CuRe ..... . ........ - ----- 777 W yw A!i �g 1 5' RED SETBACX • 25' REQ`D L I n- RFQ�D" IR DR) EMT SETBACK (Dj (SETBACK (14111 -.4 EMICK ENCLOSURE !� To BE REMOVED OR 3 LOWERED TO M IN gol LECTRICAL IR 5F RMDC I . -.11 1 - I E SIGHT TRIANGLES . ..... ........ ..... ...... TO HOUSE E EMT JD C.C.. 2�! RUNE -q 4' HIGH C� t • SOLID FENCE V. gj . A :;.h D SETBACK j;E EMT 4 ... • U �41-WR g R-C.-ITIE-RT17 TO BE L - ev N1. 11 T �41-WR R �.H fiat V 141 . .... . NOR N 12 5, 14, go". 2 . 1 . - 11 C-MESTEUC.IATE INLET 21V' - -------- 1� i I.NING ..IR 14-t S 4- EMSTING a' % Re r NEW 71\ 'i 18. Typi WHEEL S P ( 4- 41 Re Ii I LAND USE SUMMARY &ii TRIANGLES N, TRIANGLES seal Z-10d., Z.-talt D (ID-abana) PGF(tl�u . I 11,4 MMR 0d.&-HjSb D.Mfty R.WmA4 v RESURFACE AANDSCAP R S& 3.33 (145.135 d) PRPOOSEO� SETBACK Iftwd" U., CBD (CMdniJ BuMaNI Din TZLOT REO'D SETBACK RH (RddMW High) BWMI,z 91. mad E.kft 8W9 or 1.29 FAM) -,7; FAJL: 1 1. EASING PARKING LOT WILL BE MILLED. Fmpowd 185,184d(( 27F-AM) "K , LRE.AE EXISTING 0.40 SHON S BAR 1, VERTICAL 1,115 Sr BUILDING STOP SIG To TO BE REMOVED BETTY LAIL AS KOWN. 8 R REFUSE AREA OVERWID WTH NEW ASPHALT AND STRIPED MIMI- RI -1 24' WHITE OUR j CUT .0 CAP ALL 2 ParkInIn Rm-d N-pinxifilUtibly/InfiaMMUI UTILITIES MM 7bDECIMT11DII MSrNG GRADES AND FLOW PATTERNS WILL 105 VIMMII E SrNG ASPHALT IS TO BE R/W REMAIN. Pmiftg Stakly (Anaft 2BI dm-Madl REMOVED WITHIN THE BETTY LANE U.& M I I\,) AREA TO BE PAVED CATION MAP Pmpowd 145q-.bpwAdM1 .._To_ EMSTNG GRACE Ms INTERIM LANDSCAPE AREA IN 65,369 Mf(45%) R) MEDIUM-HIGH DENSITY PROPOSEO GRADE Vdd.hr U. A- (VUA): F.H. ESIDENTAL 9.364d (14.3%) GAL DESDMPRW Sf- Rft (18111)-, LE E.Wing; 0.86 (2.87 A- - 124,9% d) A PM-. WM 7 NOWN 10 AND WE 13 ROMAN Ik FA EM4CDYS TO UVE Nuaak AS RRUIROD IN RAT M 11, PIWE 4 T THE RMUC MONO 7 rMELLM MR RORDA prq..m: 0.90 (2.66 116,040.1) IMEHER TN -PROJECT A - q Ins 1 aQXMH N% A SADVISM OF LOS 16 AND 17 Me TIE EAST 1/2 M Uas 5 W 6 OF ME PNXETT MAE su-SM, M REOMMED 0 - M 6, PIKE S. T RE NMLC RE� W FaOLL'a M", LOCATION 0imm SiM-u 0.67 A- (29,095 d) (20%) EXETER WTH .I A PMTEN T LOTS A Me % U ANIMMYS TO LANE AXIM, As W0 N MY M 11, POE M, 7 X PALC RECOG 7 PNDLAs =TY FUMDL EBMG WE 1.10N 1 aEsa`MEu As iQLOYN B.i.d.g 96 ft mamm ff w:Ltm summam. As Wanness IN Run 11.11ft. Iffauft �M ATTNEMIRIN 1/40�TSOBICRIIN 1% RIONGERM WrWE R.OETHEN OTIN MCWTSIM sECaaN Is AMSTAMET 1,0085HU; T19VXRUNSMY5g3�R ff FA ONE M SMT52r% A 0 TMOE OF N&V RD V THE MTT HEIGNINK INEWE RUN SE12TWE ALDRG THE MPARLY MOMYT Un k suao % REM Me'sMIM TURACE, As REXAM11 0 M M k F`WE 14. RE PELE KDIRDS T�n Mw. -& ,d P-,,dWP,&- P-dtoBffd- 11CREFLY EIIIEN9OL A dST:W. ff ]TIM FED 1011E SMTEAST CfiPDi ff SND 4016; TIdR MM SMOLl6i11101G TE FASIFAY Bd6DlAY ff SW 400(0 EMRD RAT 6 BAOMLOM TML1.. A LDAX. ff 2MI0 FEET 10 TE SMIIEAST CMEN ff lM 14 SE BOOT ; IENSO j G • • Sdb.d.: I- Ofiat 012e1 (9) N/A 61100MICE THIACE, A 09MM OF MM � M RE NUTTRIEST � OF LOT 11 SO HLOX I IEM �T OF BROOKKOO RERIIACE, THEME W MI'VE XGNG RE RMONERLY MOMY OF SO Uff 14 A USDME T 1ILV w To RE wMNEA`a on- B` SO WT k MID: AMA flMt (E) 0 0 WA M sarafffil ALUM ff �Y MY OF SO BMX I UVIED PAT T MMM MEADE. A - ff =02 FEET M W BMTREM ca- T SO - I IEM �T W aganan's EMIR[ MM RM W`Lnn -M M stu Y suatuer M SO BGo a, `NEnAs 1- 0 1. 0 fiO (w) MA REOGED Ansa- A -TUNTNEL�YMUMARYUF A SAUVISON TuRaMM 17MMEW I/2TWE 5 "Iler"PNEETESTOE-But MEONEDW ROM IIJ� K-EaMas CUTv. -A, THEN. - 4006481 A DUMDE . M.- M THE SM11FA5T CaNFN R SO A SUMEMN OF - M - 11 Ma RE EAST 1/2 OF WE 5 AND 6 OF THEP-ESTATE SAIROMN, IID%E U WLTUrIt A WMCE OF 102.09 FEET Ta A PUNT MAT TES 10 FEETIEWITINEM �T�ff�A� TMl6Ml7MOMEWI/2TLM5MDfiTXP�MAI�WMMMMNM5iSL�AME10�WMP�MM�Y��ff�AM WUM16M17 t i., selbaclan F'O'n 25 fixt 7.1 figt (E) NIA AWX06T49IMMAMTMKSdDDEYBGNONNYTWtBTMF.&OMIWYSFOMMIM MAT UMIG FEET EAST TMMNE malts T SAD WT&MMMNMW nmm L a�Hjgh Fgamt 25 fixt 25 fact (W) N/A SUREILY MUMMY OF SO LOT L FOR A UNDOE OF IOM Her M RE staffl- c- a SO LOT & THEME RUN 110015111 VNG N EST M111MY OF SO WIT A A [ISTNUE OF 27.81 FEET TO THE PUNT Or BEGME11 Ell k UNTONG 14gIB WINE OR 133 ADES. MAE M 1. RE E-1 - SEEN - IS M BE BIT Damdty B-) SI& 5 fi. SfO(N& N/A ALL num ILL BE MXED MODMOLNG IF VERIZON r,.1111b. Gulf Coast Consulting, Inc. -4 1 w 1290 Clcvcland Street a-.. CLEAR. LUTE 1. 11 Site Plan A.I. IRE .. PER .1 or OUEARW CIcarviatcr, Florida 1 2/a/aS REMSED PER arY 0' O.EARWATER V. R L- VERIZON SITE RP ORIGINAL RECEIVED MAR 07 2000 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER 0 9 PHOTO I SCiJTHVNEST CORNER 0= E: {ISTI JG BUILDING PHOTO 2 WEST SIDEiVCRTH VJEST COR �Z R OF EXISTING EUILDING ORIGINAL RFCFW-rl MAR 07 2000 PLANNING L)EPARIMEM CITY OF CLEARWATEP �- 0 0 < )TO 3 SOUTHEAST COPNEP. 0: EXISTING BU LCIN�i PH070 4 EAST SIDE /NORTHEAST CCRNER 07- E"JSTING BU-DING FROM ADJACENT G)4-S STAT ON 3UILDIl')G 0 9 ORIGINAL RFCFIVFQ MAR 07 2000 IL4NNING DEPARTMEN) CITY OF CLFARWATER 0 PHOTO 5 MCP. —H SIDE C-F E;ISTR\,-: E'U LDING FRCM PAF K N G AREA TO BE RECESIGr\ ED PHO--`J 6 SOUT-1 ,31D= CF EX STINC BUILDING FROIV �c 0 JTH SI DE OF C_EVELA%JD S-TREET 0 0 ORIGINAL PFC'FWFr MAR 0 7 2008 "LANNING CITY OF i)EPARTMEN) CIFARWATEP 0 0 PHOTO 7 WEST SIDE OF EXISTING BUILDING FROM ADJACENT MOTEL PROPERTY PHOTO 8 EAS- SIDE CF EXSITING BUILDING FRUM ADJACENT GAS STATION PROPERTY 0 0 ORIGINAL RFCt;Il P MAR 0 7 2000 OLANNING DEPARTMEN) CITY OF CLEARWATF.R 0 0 PHOTO 9 NORTH SIDE'�ORTHMST CORNER OF EX STING BUILCING FR:)M BETTY LANE .&A-. 'HDTO 10 E: STING 61. ILDING TO BE REMOVIED 0 0 ORIGINAL RFOFIVFD MAR 0 7 2000 �'LANNING ®EFARIMENT CITY OF CLEARW.ATER 0 0 F'HOT4D ' 1 NOR -H EAST CORNER OF EX STING BUILDING FROM NORTH SIDE Oz EX 3T1NG FESIDENTIAL LOT 0 0 ORIGINAL RECENEr` MAR 0 7 2009 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY Of CLEARWATER m Gulf Coast Consulting, Inc. ORIGINAL RECEIVED NOV 02 2001 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CL.EARWATER PARKING STUDY FOR VERIZON OFFICE BUILDING 1280 CLEVELAND STREET CLEARWATER , FLORIDA PREPARED FOR: VERIZON, INC. PREPARED BY: GULF COAST CONSULTING, INC. AUGUST 2007 PROJECT # 07 -053 Robert Pergolf4z- v.CP AICP #9023 ORIGINAL RECEIVED NOV 02 2007 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER I. INTRODUCTION Verizon maintains an office building/switching station at 1280 Cleveland Street in Clearwater. The site is located on the north side of Cleveland Street between Betty Lane and Frederica Avenue. Verizon is proposing to sell the northern portion of their property and consolidate the parking on the southern two - thirds of the property adjacent to the existing building. (See Figure 1) The redevelopment of the property is the subject of a Flexible Development Application. This application requires an assessment of the parking adequacy for the operation and it was determined a parking study should be completed. As part of the redevelopment the parking lot will be reconfigured to include a total of 180 spaces. II. METHODOLOGY The site currently contains 185,194 square feet of building space which is characterized as an office. The building houses a maximum of 141 employees and much of the space is devoted to switching equipment, and non - office space. It is not a call center or 24 -hour operation. The site currently contains 368 parking spaces. Per the Community Development Code there is a minimum parking requirement of 3 spaces per 1,000 square feet of office space. According to strict interpretation of the code, the existing building would require 556 parking spaces. The sale of excess property will reduce the parking lot to 180 spaces (0.967/1000 s.f.) The code provides for reducing the required number of parking spaces to recognize the special situations that exist for Verizon. The Community Development Code allows a reduction in parking if the property will require fewer parking spaces per floor area than otherwise required due to unique operations and a significant portion of the building is used for storage or non- parking demand- generating purposes. Prior to conducting this analysis a methodology was established with the City of Clearwater staff. It was agreed GCC would conduct a parking accumulation study on a normal weekday between 7 AM and 7 PM. The study area included the existing parking lot only since public parking lots and on- street spaces are not in close proximity to the site III. EXISTING PARKING CONDITIONS Existing conditions were established by conducting parking lot counts between the hours of 7:00 AM and 7:00 PM on Tuesday August 21, 2007. The existing Verizon parking lot was checked on the hour for the number of spaces that were ORIGINAL RECEIVED NOV 02 2007 1 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER a 0 0 n 0 0 N f+1 00 U 3 v w cem 0 M 0 0 L v v U W V O U oa N� v� LnN J W C Z i a � Y (J N ORIGINAL RECEIVED NOV 02 2007 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER PROJECT LOCATION — VERIZON OFFICE PROJECT NO: 07 -053 Gulf Coast Consulting, Inc. DATE: FIGURE: s�2oo7 Land Development Consulting DRAWN BY: G.J.S. occupied. The number of occupied spaces was noted and an hourly accumulated total was obtained. Tuesday August 21, 2007 On Tuesday (a normal weekday) parking demand varied significantly throughout the day from a low of 20 occupied spaces (5 %) at 5:00 PM to a peak demand of 105 occupied spaces (29 %) at 10:00 AM. Table 1 provides an hourly tabulation and Figure 2 provides a graph of hourly parking space occupancy. IV. FUTURE CONDITIONS WITH REDEVELOPMENT The proposed modifications would result in 180 on -site parking spaces. The site would require 556 parking spaces according to strict interpretation of the code. Assuming the worst case, a minimum of 75 parking spaces (180 -105) would be available. Therefore, the modification of the parking lot to contain 180 spaces will still provide adequate parking for the existing operation at this site. V. CONCLUSION This analysis was conducted in accordance with a specific methodology established with City of Clearwater staff. This analysis demonstrates a maximum of 105 parking spaces were occupied during any hour of the study period. As such, the Verizon office building parking demands are easily satisfied by the current parking supply. With the redevelopment of site decreasing the parking supply to 180 spaces, the parking demands of the office building can be accommodated. ORIGINAL RECEIVED NOV 02 2007 2 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CRY OF CLEARWATER TIME 7:00 AM 8:00 AM 9:00 AM 10:00 AM 11:00 AM 12 NOON 1:00 PM 2:00 PM 3:00 PM 4:00 PM 5:00 PM 6:00 PM 7:00 PM TABLE 1 TUESDAY AUGUST 21, 2007 VERIZON PARKING LOT OCC. TOTAL % OCCUPIED 42 368 11% 85 368 23% 103 368 28% 105 368 29% 103 368 28% 88 368 24% 96 368 26% 104 368 28% 99 368 27% 75 368 20% 34 368 9% 25 368 7% 20 368 5% �t NOV 02 2007 PLANNING DEPARYMUNt Cffy OF CLWWATIM U Oz 00 v aR �4 360 340 320 300 280 260 240 w 220 U Qa 200 U) 0 180 160 V 0 140 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 C 0 O c a� 0 -w FIGURE 2 - TUESDAY AUGUST 21, 2007 7:00 AM 8:00 AM 9:00 AM 10:00 11:00 12 1:00 PM 2:00 PM 3:00 PM 4:00 PM 5:00 PM 6:00 PM 7:00 PM AM AM NOON TIME OF DAY --o— Series1 AM- _J6 c�QAto -p T Receipt #: 1200700000000009870 Date: 11/02/2007 11/2/2007 11:46:46AM Line Items: Case No Tran Code Description Revenue Account No Amount Paid FLD2007 -11035 04 Flexible Commercial 010- 341262 1,205.00 FLD2007 -11035 Fire - Prelim Site Plan 010- 342501 200.00 Line Item Total: $1,405.00 Payments: s Method Payer Initials Check No Confirm No How Received Amount Paid Check HOLLAND AND KNIGHT LLP R_D 22033 In Person 1,405.00 Payment Total: $1,405.00 THIS IS NOT A PERMIT. This is a receipt for an application for a permit. This application will be reviewed and you will be notified as to the outcome of the application. Page 1 of ] cReceipt.rpt FLD2007mlIO35 1280 CLEVELAND ST VERIZON OFFICE PLANNER OF RECORD: WW ATLAS # 287B ZONING: D LAND USE: CBD RECEIVED: 11/02/2007 INCOMPLETE: COMPLETE: MAPS: PHOTOS: STAFF REPORT: DRC: CDB: CLWCoverSheet Older. P DEC 312001 c"McMMMER CITY 'OE LEA WAT E I� 1, POST OFFICE BOX 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758 -4748 MUNICIPAL, SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33776 TELEPHONE (727) 562 -4567 FAx (727) 562 -4865 PLANNING DEPARTMENT March ,19, 2008 James Shimberg Holland & Knight 100 N. Tampa Street, Suite 4100 Tampa, FL 33602 -3644 RE: Development Order - Case FLD2007 -11035 1280 Cleveland Street Dear Mr, Shimberg: This letter constitutes a Development Order pursuant to Section 4- 206.D.6 of the Community Development Code. On March 18, 2008, the Community Development Board reviewed your request for Flexible Development approval (1) for the Termination of Status of Nonconformity for Floor Area Ratio [FAR] (1.27 FAR existing /proposed; where 0.55 FAR permitted today) and for building height (86 feet existing; where 50 -foot height permitted today) in the Downtown District (East Gateway Character District), under the provisions of Section 6 -109; (2) to permit the improvement of the existing site and parking areas for a "utilities /infrastructure facility" use in the Downtown District, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2- 903.C; and (3) to permit Nonresidential Off - Street Parking in the Medium High Density Residential (MHDR) District with deviations to reduce the side (north) setback from 10 to five feet (to pavement) and to allow the placement of landscaping on the inside of the buffer fence /wall along the north and south sides of the property, as a Residential Infill Project, under the provisions of Section 2- 404.F. The Community Development Board (CDB) APPROVED the application with the following Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and Conditions of Approval: Findings of Fact: 1. The 3.33 acres is located on the north side of Cleveland Street between N. Betty Lane and N. Fredrica Avenue; 2. The property owner owns the entire block between Cleveland Street, Drew Street, N. Betty Lane and N. Fredrica Avenue, except the residential out - parcel at 22 N. Fredrica Avenue; 3. It is the owners' desire to split off the northern portion of the parking lot that is no longer needed and sell it for residential development; 4. The buildings and a portion of the accessory parking lot is zoned Downtown (D) District, while the majority of the accessory parking lot to the north of the main building is zoned Medium High Density Residential (MHDR) District; 5. The property has been developed with the utility /infrastructure facility for some time, as well as the accessory parking lot on the north side of the building; "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER" March 19, 2008 Shimberg — Page 2 6. The land area to be retained for the Verizon utility/infrastructure facility will be 145,135 square feet (3.33 acres); 7. The main building currently has 185,184 square feet of gross floor area at a height of 86 feet measured from the eastern property line; S. The Floor Area Ratio, based on the land area to be retained for the Verizon utility/infrastructure facility and the gross floor area of the main building, is 1.27; 9. The intensity standards adopted for the East Gateway Character District sets a maximum Floor Area Ratio of 0.55 and a maximum height of 50 feet for office uses (which this is most similar to); 10. The existing Verizon utility/infrastructure facility is nonconforming to both Floor Area Ratio and Height; 11. The development proposal includes a request for Termination of Status of Nonconformity for Floor Area Ratio [FAR] (1.27 FAR existing /proposed; where 0.55 FAR permitted today) and for building height (86 feet existing; where 50 -foot height permitted today) in the Downtown District (East Gateway Character District); 12. The applicant proposes to upgrade their parking lots to City standards and improve the property to landscaping requirements; 13. There is no parking requirement for utility/infrastructure facilities in the Downtown District. The applicant had prepared a Parking Demand Study, which determined a parking need for 105 parking spaces. This proposal includes the provision of 145 parking spaces, which will more than meet their identified parking need; 14. The primary parking lot on the north side of the main building will include the removal of the small, one -story building to allow for the improvement of the parking lot, cutting back the pavement to a 10 -foot setback from N. Betty Lane to install landscape screening for the parking lot within the D District and cutting back the pavement to meet the required 25 -foot front setback from N. Betty Lane and installing landscape screening for the parking lot within the MHDR District; 15. The applicant is requesting a deviation to provide only the required setback of five -feet along the north property line, as well as requesting a deviation to the flexibility criteria to place the required landscaping on the inside of the required fence rather than the outside of the fence. This deviation request also applies to the south side of the property adjacent to the residential out - parcel at 22 N. Fredrica Avenue, where the required fence is proposed along the property line and the landscaping is proposed on the inside of the fence; 16. Foundation landscaping will be installed along the edge of the building along N. Fredrica Avenue and Cleveland Street, which will aid in softening the building fagade and improve. the street appearance of this otherwise blank -wall building; 17. The landscape design represents a dramatic visual improvement to this site, one that will provide visual interest and shade to the parking areas, as well as substantially enhancing and upgrading the neighborhood appearance; 18. There are no outstanding Code Enforcement issues associated with the subject property. Conclusions of Law: 1. That the development proposal is consistent with the Flexibility criteria for Termination of Status of Nonconformity as per Section 6 -109 of the Community Development Code; 2. That the development proposal is consistent with the Standards as per Table 2 -902 for the Downtown District and Tables 2 -401.1 and 2 -404 of the Community Development Code; 3. That the development proposal is consistent with the Flexibility criteria as per Section 2 -903.0 of the Community Development Code; _i 1 March 19, 2008 Shimberg — Page 3 4. That the development proposal is consistent with the Flexibility criteria as per Section 2 -404.F of the Community Development Code; 5. That the development proposal is consistent with the General Standards for Level Two Approvals as per Section 3 -913 of the Community Development Code; and 6. That the development proposal is consistent with the Design Guidelines of the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan. Conditions of Approval: 1. That, prior to the submission for a site development building permit to effect the site changes, a Release of Unity of Title and Minor Lot Adjustment application be submitted to and approved by the Planning Department; 2. That, prior to the issuance of a site development building permit, the owner deed as additional right - of -way, or dedicate as a right -of -way easement, to the City of Clearwater the southern 10 feet for that part of Lots 7 — 10 along Cleveland Street; 3. That the shrubs along the north side of the existing detached dwelling attain six feet height within three years; 4. That the existing overhead utility lines which run along the east side of Betty Lane be placed underground prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Completion on the site improvements building permit; 5. That the relocation of the existing overhead utilities serving 22 N. Fredrica Avenue be in a manner and location acceptable to, and at no expense to, that property owner; 6. That, prior to the issuance of a site development building permit, the site and landscape plans be amended to show vertical curbing along the edge of pavement for the equipment service area on the west side of the building adjacent to Cleveland Street and N. Betty Lane; and 7. That, prior to the issuance of a site development building permit, compliance with all requirements of General Engineering, Stormwater Engineering and Traffic Engineering be met. Pursuant to Section 4 -407, an application for a building permit shall be made within one year of Flexible Development approval (March 18, 2009). All required certificates of occupancy shall be obtained within two years of the date of issuance of the initial building permit. The building permit must be obtained within six months of the initial permit application. This timeframe to obtain the initial building permit may be extended for an additional six months for cause by the Community Development Coordinator. Time frames do not change with successive owners. The Community Development Coordinator may grant an extension of time for the Flexible. Development approval for a period not to exceed one year and only within the original period of validity. The Community Development Board may approve one additional extension of time for the Flexible Development approval after the Community Development Coordinator's extension to initiate a building permit application. The issuance of this Development Order does not relieve you of the necessity to obtain any building permits or pay any impact fees that may be required. In order to facilitate the issuance of any permit or license affected by this approval, please bring a copy of this letter with you when applying for any permits or licenses that require this prior development approval. Additionally, an appeal of a Level Two approval (Flexible Development) may be initiated pursuant to Section 4 -502.B by the applicant or by any person granted party status within 14 days of the date of the CDB meeting. The filing of an application /notice of appeal shall stay the effect of the decision pending March 19, 2008 Shimberg — Page 4 r I the final determination of the case. The appeal period for your case expires on April 1, 2008 (14 days from the date of the CDB meeting). If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call Wayne M. Wells, Planner III, at 727 -562 -4504. You can access zoning information for parcels within the City through our website: www.myclearwater.com/ og v/depts /planning. Sincerely, Michae Delk, A P Planning Director S:IPlanning Depart»2entlC D BIFLEX (FLD)IInactive or Finished Applications l Cleveland Street 1280 Verizon Office (D and MHDR) - ApprovedlCleveland 1280 Development Order 3.19.08.doc AFFIDAVIT STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF PINELLAS. BEFORE ME, the undersigned authority, this date appeared Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Planner III of the City of Clearwater, Florida, who being first duly sworn, deposed and said: That he is a Planner III in the Planning Department for the City of Clearwater, Florida, and that he has first hand knowledge of the information herein contained. 2. That on , 2009, the City of Clearwater, Florida, approved a Minor Lot Adjustment (Case File No. MIS2008- 06003) for GTE Florida Inc, c/o Property Tax Section, formerly owners of all of the real property described below in Section 3. and located in Clearwater, Pinellas County, Florida (hereinafter the "Lots of Record "). As approved by the Community. Development Board on March 18, 2008, under Case Number FLD2007- 11035, it was the intent to reconfigure the Lots of Record for the purpose of selling the northern portion of the property to a separate entity (Parcel A) and GTE Florida Inc, c/o Property Tax Section retaining the southern portion of the property (Parcel B). Based upon the information submitted to the City by the applicant, the City determined that all requirements for such Minor Lot Adjustment were complied with as required by Section 4 -701.D of the Community Development Code of the City of Clearwater, Florida. This Affidavit is made upon information currently available to the City of Clearwater, and is subject to change in the event that such information is subsequently determined to be incorrect.. 3. That prior to the approval of the Minor Lot Adjustment, the Lots of Record were legally described as: Parcel 1 (Parcel #15/29/15/26658 /000 /0010) LOTS 1 THROUGH 9 INCLUSIVE, F.A. KENNEDY'S FAIR LANE ADDITION, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 11, PAGE 16, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA. Parcel 2 (Parcel #15/29/15/12276 /003/0010) LOTS 1 THROUGH 10 INCLUSIVE, REVISED. PLAT OF BROOKWOOD TERRACE, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 8, PAGE 34, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA. PREPARED BY: City of Clearwater Planning Department 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, FL 33756 -5520 Case MIS2008 -08003 — 0612 Druid Road — Page 1 of 9 Parcel 3 (Parcel #15/29/15/12276 /003/0130) LOTS 13 THROUGH 18 INCLUSIVE, REVISED PLAT OF BROOKWOOD TERRACE, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 8, PAGE 34, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA. Parcel 4 (Parcel #15/29/15/65250 /002/0010) LOTS 1 THROUGH 10 INCLUSIVE, LESS ROAD, PADGETT'S ESTATES SUBDIVISION, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 6, PAGE 59, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA. 4. That a certified survey for Parcel reflecting the lot line locations as approved by this Minor Lot Adjustment are attached to and submitted with this Affidavit for recording in the Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida. Said Parcel A and Parcel B will be legally described as: PARCEL A ` "� (Address: �: r` : �� Ft '° >�iw'ri�prAvenu ;; Parcel #15/29/15/26658 /000 /0010) A PORTION OF LOTS 1 THROUGH 6, REVISED PLAT OF BROOKWOOD TERRACE, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 8, PAGE 34, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA. TOGETHER WITH: A PORTION OF LOTS 1 THROUGH 8, F.A. KENNEDY'S FAIR LANE ADDITION, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 11, PAGE 16, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA. BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE NORTH 1/4 CORNER OF SECTION 15, TOWNSHIP 29 SOUTH, RANGE 15 EAST; THENCE RUN S89 °18'56 "E ALONG THE NORTH BOUNDARY OF SAID SECTION 15, A DISTANCE. OF 1,093.85 FEET; THENCE RUN S00 °15'53 "W, A DISTANCE OF 31.80 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF KELLET'S SUBDIVISION, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 11, PAGE 24, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA; THENCE RUN S89 °05'28 "E, A DISTANCE OF 40.00 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF F.A. KENNEDY'S FAIR LANE ADDITION, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 11, PAGE 16, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA, SAID POINT ALSO BEING THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE RUN S89 021'09 "E ALONG THE NORTH BOUNDARIES OF SAID F.A. KENNEDY'S FAIR LANE ADDITION AND REVISED PLAT OF BROOKWOOD TERRACE, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 8, PAGE 34, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA, A Case MIS2008 -08003 — 0612 Druid Road — Page 2 of 9 DISTANCE OF 310.07 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF BLOCK 3, SAID REVISED PLAT OF BROOKWOOD TERRACE; THENCE RUN S00 °00' 19 "W ALONG THE EAST BOUNDARY OF SAID BLOCK 3, REVISED PLAT OF BROOKWOOD TERRACE, A DISTANCE OF 310.02 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 6, OF SAID BLOCK 3, . REVISED PLAT OF BROOKWOOD TERRACE;. THENCE RUN N89 °22' 14 "W ALONG THE SOUTHERLY BOUNDARY OF SAID LOT. 6 AND ITS WESTERLY EXTENSION, A DISTANCE OF 311.44 FEET TO A POINT ON THE WESTERLY BOUNDARY OF F.A. KENNEDY'S. FAIR LANE ADDITION; THENCE RUN N00 °15'26 "E ALONG THE WEST BOUNDARY. OF F.A. KENNEDY'S FAIR LANE ADDITION, A DISTANCE OF 310.10 FEET TO THE POINT. OF BEGINNING. CONTAINING. 96,349 SQUARE FEET OR 2.21 ACRES, MORE OR LESS.... PARCEL B (Address: 1280 Cleveland Street; Parcel #15/29/15/65250 /002/0010) A PORTION OF. LOTS 7 THROUGH 10 AND LOTS 13 THROUGH 18, F.A. KENNEDY'S FAIR LANE ADDITION, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 11, PAGE 6, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA. TOGETHER WITH:. A PORTION OF LOTS 1 THROUGH 10, A SUBDIVISION OF LOTS 16 AND 17 AND THE EAST 1/2 OF LOTS 5 AND 6 OF THE PADGETT ESTATE SUBDIVISION, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 6, PAGE 59, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS. COUNTY, FLORIDA TOGETHER WITH:. A PORTION OF LOTS 8 AND 9, F.A. KENNEDY'S FAIR LANE ADDITION,. AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 11, PAGE 16, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA. BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE NORTH 1/4 CORNER OF SAID SECTION 15; THENCE RUN S89 °18'56 "E ALONG THE NORTH BOUNDARY OF SAID SECTION 15, A DISTANCE OF 1,093.85 FEET; THENCE RUN S00 015'53 "W, A DISTANCE OF 31.80 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF KELLET'S SUBDIVISION, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 11, PAGE 24, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA; THENCE RUN S89 005'28 "E, A DISTANCE OF 40 FEET, TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF F.A. KENNEDY'S FAIR LANE ADDITION, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 11, PAGE 16, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA; THENCE RUN S00 015'26 "W, A DISTANCE OF 310.10 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE RUN S89 °22' 14 "E ALONG THE Case MIS2008 -08003 — 0612 Druid Road — Page 3 of 9 SOUTHERLY BOUNDARY OF LOT 6, REVISED PLAT OF BROOKWOOD TERRACE, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 8, PAGE 34, IN THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA, AND ITS WESTERLY EXTENSION, A DISTANCE OF 311.44 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT 6; THENCE RUN S00 °00' 19 "W ALONG THE EASTERLY BOUNDARY OF SAID BLOCK 3, REVISED PLAT OF BROOKWOOD TERRACE, A DISTANCE OF 200.10 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 10, SAID BLOCK 3, REVISED PLAT OF BROOKWOOD TERRACE; THENCE RUN N89 036'34 "W ALONG THE SOUTHERLY BOUNDARY OF SAID LOT 10, A DISTANCE OF 111.00 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT 10; THENCE RUN S00 007'34 "W ALONG THE WESTERLY BOUNDARIES OF LOTS 11 AND 12, SAID BLOCK 3, REVISED PLAT OF BROOKWOOD TERRACE, A DISTANCE OF 100.00 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 13, SAID BLOCK 3, REVISED PLAT OF BROOKWOOD TERRACE; THENCE RUN S89 °31'43 "E ALONG THE NORTHERLY BOUNDARY OF SAID LOT 13, A DISTANCE OF 111.22 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT 13; THENCE RUN S00 °00'06 "E ALONG THE EASTERLY BOUNDARY OF SAID BLOCK 3, REVISED PLAT OF BROOKWOOD TERRACE, A DISTANCE OF 208.02 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID BLOCK 3, REVISED PLAT OF BROOKWOOD TERRACE; THENCE RUN N89 °43' 18 "W ALONG THE SOUTHERLY BOUNDARY OF SAID BLOCK 3, REVISED PLAT OF BROOKWOOD TERRACE, A DISTANCE OF 111.63 FEET TO A POINT ON THE EASTERLY BOUNDARY OF A SUBDIVISION OF LOTS 16 AND 17 AND THE EAST 1/2 OF LOTS 5 AND 6 OF THE PADGETT ESTATE SUBDIVISION, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 6, PAGE 59, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA; THENCE RUN S00 005'48 "W, A DISTANCE OF 10.00 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID A SUBDIVISION OF LOTS 16 AND 17 AND THE EAST 1/2 OF LOTS 5 AND 6 OF THE PADGETT ESTATE SUBDIVISION; THENCE RUN N89 °43' 18 "W, A DISTANCE OF 192.09 FEET TO A POINT THAT LIES 10 FEET EAST OF THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID A SUBDIVISION OF LOTS 16 AND 17 AND THE EAST 1/2 OF LOTS 5 AND 6 OF THE PADGETT ESTATE SUBDIVISION; THENCE RUN N00 015'26 "E, ALONG A LINE 10 FEET EAST AND PARALLEL TO THE WESTERLY BOUNDARY OF SAID A SUBDIVISION OF LOTS 16 AND 17 AND THE EAST 1/2 OF LOTS 5 AND 6 OF THE PADGETT ESTATE SUBDIVISION, A DISTANCE OF 492.50 M, TO A POINT ON THE SOUTHERLY BOUNDARY OF LOT 8 OF SAID F.A. KENNEDY'S FAIR LANE ADDITION THAT LIES 10 FEET EAST OF THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT 8; THENCE RUN N89° 19'40 "W, ALONG THE SOUTHERLY BOUNDARY OF SAID Case MIS2008 -08003 — 0612 Druid Road — Page 4 of 9 Q LOT 8, FOR A DISTANCE OF 10 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT 8; THENCE RUN N00 °15'26 "E, ALONG THE WEST BOUNDARY OF SAID LOT 8, A DISTANCE OF 27.61 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. CONTAINING 145,135 SQUARE FEET OR 3.33 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. Nothing herein shall be construed to excuse full compliance with all applicable governmental requirements relating to the development of the aforementioned Lots of Record. STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF PINELLAS (SEAL ABOVE) Attachments: Wayne M. Wells, AICP Planner III The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 51 2009, by WAYNE M. WELLS, on behalf of whom the instrument was executed. Notary Commission Number: Personally known Type of identification produced Notary Public Signature Name of Notary Printed or produced identification Case MIS2008 -08003 — 0612 Druid Road — Page 5 of 9 S. (planning DepartmentiLettersMinor Lot AdjustmentlDruid 0612 Rosen- Gabash (D) - MIS2008- 08003IDruid 0612 Affidavit 9.8.08.doc Case MIS2008 -08003 — 0612 Druid Road — Page 6 of 9 Menno To: Wayne Wells ..r From: Mary Thurman ° / a 6-> 9 �o CC: Date: June 5, 2008 Re: Minor Lot Adjustment for 1280 ClevelandNerizon Site Wayne: Southport is purchasing the northern 2.21 acres of 1280 Cleveland (the Verizon Site). Verizon is retaining the balance of the site. At the request of the City we need to submit for a minor lot adjustment to the site. Attached are three copies of the survey (2 full size and 1 8.5 x 14) for the portion of the site we are purchasing and the portion Verizon is retaining. I have also included a copy of the existing deed and a check to the City of Clearwater for $150. Please let me know if there is any additional information that you need and the timeline for completing the lot adjustment. Regards, Z-13o Cs C"� 1 Fax Cover Memo CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, 2ND FLOOR CLEARWATER, FL 33756 (727) 562 -4567 FAX: (727) 562 -4865 TO: MIOINA % ✓r rV DATE: (o V 10 FAX: �O fo 9 - +2-33 TELEPHONE: (uj • 3 w h o FROM: Wayne M. Wells TELEPHONE: (727) 562 -4504 SUBJECT: M S ZVO 0 h fl 01 MESSAGE: NUMBER OF SHEETS (INCLUDING THIS PAGE): Z_- Check SOUTHPORT FINANCIAL vjs 1138 SERVICES In Person Payment Total: THIS IS NOT A PERMIT. This is a receipt for an application for a permit. This application will be reviewed and you will be notified as to the outcome of the application. Page 1 of 1 150.00 $150.00 cReceipt.rpt 6/6/2008 Sig ,.1;• Receipt #: 1200800000000004707 10:37:10AM .p := r Date: 06 /06/2008 Line Items: Case No Tran Code Description Revenue Account No Amount Paid MIS2008 -06003 Miscellaneous Fees 001000000341405000 150.00 Line Item Total: $150.00 Payments: Method Payer Initials Check No Confirm No How Received Amount Paid Check SOUTHPORT FINANCIAL vjs 1138 SERVICES In Person Payment Total: THIS IS NOT A PERMIT. This is a receipt for an application for a permit. This application will be reviewed and you will be notified as to the outcome of the application. Page 1 of 1 150.00 $150.00 cReceipt.rpt SECTION 15, TWP. 29 S., RNG. 15 E., PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA ------------- tI --------- 1 _ l � P�6 _ ---- - - - --- - - --- -- - - - --- -- - FIT - - -- - S -HAT � j I -------------- -- - - - -- -' idAT EET aao a Ac �wOH -,S °°d d' . m f lo "o jdNE FA -.. w Ins PADWrrS ESTATES y N A SU®DMSM OF LOTS 18 MW 9 - yoo'. 1 SUBOWISM i i' . MW THE EAST' V2 OF LOTS 5 AIDS 5 o f ° °�° >.+ •'.r O� a�l ATNdA I " OF THE PADOETT ESTATE SUBDIVISIOPi W m I L�ate, ` � m I 10 15 F 1m s 17 s. 18 D I -------- - - - -------- - --------- _ - • z,�a,, ... . y�0 .... Dom. y`O . ydi e�� <� re $. y°eaO I' _6W¢H - a106mwawns�lmF'.nFA p'p` I . FIAt/tT106 1 '$ [AST IO aAO63N04 a H ANNIE 6NE 9m'A911 E H NRII FSaE 9 ®'®I I �I - -- -.� -- - - --Ya - -- �, I� - --+- -- -- - - -- -- - - - - -- - -- CLEVELAND SDZEET - - - -- - -- - -- -�- - -- i I A RNNN ff lOR ] TH111N IO ND LOTS ll ➢NmDI I& fA IEIIImYS FNf UAE /IDeDI A5 RELWm N NAT 8006 1I. PAff 4 ff TE RHC ND1R15 ff PNEIIAS CONTY, ADm\ TE ABM PROMM AP F M BE N 2DE A N ACCOaTOE 611N TE M YAP ff TE OR Cr IORIIER NDE 4EARMAA, OAYNO PA 125094 WP NA®t 12107G-0 MA WP MY= WT 17, M PNPA6D iDR A PDTINN 6 LpA l 11HIIAN 14 A NHIl9JN ff 101518 ND 17 llD TE EAST In ff 1015 S AID 6 ff AE PMRTf ESGT 9®f60E M IE4lDm M RAT BOR 4 PAE `$ ff 11E RHC �S 6 PHIlAS CDNIY, i1DIDA Eldml ROIb1 � TO GEM EM A PDmD1 W 1015 6 AD 4 FA IE @Qn FAR LANE MMM M NOTHD N RAT WX 11, PACE 14 ff TE "M AECWS ff P6611M CDNIT. fiO✓DA NNW wK PAFIIOAAAY Mum AS FO701@ OO6ENDC AT TIE ICBM 1/4 COB ff W ffCTD117{ T RLN S6P1656'E A THE IIWN BDADARY ff SAD SELTHI 14 A 06TANE ff IO ffi RET TENff RN SW15V K A DAAIff W 71.60 RET 10 TIE NWI1EASf CO66T W KMM 28D9190 L AS �` N RAT BOR 11, PAR 24, ff TE PEW KC ff NE= mIRBY, RDRON Ma RN 56E UX A 06TANM ff 10W FEED 10 mE NWW*M C ff FA ADEEDYS FAN INE ADDTOLA AS R WFD N RAT BODL IL PAGE 14 ff M R PFEl W ff 1ETIlAS CDTOT, RDmA Ma RN 50015161, A 061NICE ff 71010 FEET W TE PRR ff BDEFEI4 T RN SDM14i NONE TE SOARROY BN6DART ff mT 4 NOR 6. IEE® RAT ff WOWM TINA{ AS RMM N RAT BOW 4 PAGE 74, N TE RH IECOMS OF PNL W M N .. ROMk AID R5 NSTAT WDEM A 06T:Wff ff 711.44 FEET TO THE mOOEAST olINM ff SID L 4 Ma 1H15000017E NOD TE EASMT BOMATY W SAD NOR 1 f"n RAT ff WWWO IFARACE A DSTAAT ff 20010 FEET T1 DE SAOIEA3T 0MG ff LOT 14 SAD RAR 1 E M RAT ff WODDDW EWN IN= RN N N76'747 NDC 11E SATNIOY BDEODTT ff SO LR 14 A DM.M OF lll.m FEET M TE $OMRS7 CDOQf ff SAD M 14 Ma RN 50007747 MM K EESIFRT NAMALS T 101511 ANO 12. SID NOR 1 tj A D RATE WORW00 TARACE. A DWANE 7 MOD FEET TD lff IImIN1 Y MM ff WT A SAD NOR 4 REAIID RAT ff MM=M MWACE. Ma RAI 5H7 VE ADC TE NDIOpOT BDlDARY ff SAO IDf it A 06TAIH ff 1111E FET TO 11E IIWTEAA DHEA ff SAD WT n: TEND RN WOOORE AMO 11E EASmOY WM MY ff SAD NOR 1 W4MD RAT ff WORNJID T M A OW ff MM FEET VD DE 9118E/57 LWER ff SAD NOR 7. R.1® MT ff === TINA[ Ma RN X6745167 AM TE MnHAY BD6DAAT ff SAD NOR 7. IEVSD RAT ff WORIROD TRtlq A DWA ff ,jT FELT TO A NT M DE FASRAT BOADATY W A SHN6R 61015 16 A D 1] AD TE FAA 1/E ff IOTS 5 AD 6 6 TE PADCOT FSTAE S,ffiA6DE AS FE» N RAT M 4 PIGE 5q ff TE RHC ND1P6 ff PB619A5 4L1IT, RDmN E611ff AW SOOWW4 A DW4a ff 1000 FEET N TE WW CDHA ff 5AD A ROMM ff L015 N AND 17 AD M EAA 1/2 ff t0T5 5 AD 6 W TE PWM ESTAE 91B VEM T RN N674ST61 A DSTNIR 7192.00 R E T 1D A Pffif TNT M 10 F EL T F A S T 7 11E SDFAIEST COB ff SAO A SIDIESR 71015 R W 17 AD,TE F A A , / E ff l 5 MD 6 OF TE PADRTT EAAT MMREM Ma RN L I N E D A T A MW1526 NOC A DE 10 iFEf FAA AD P/ANIEL TI 1H ESTERT BDIQOLY ff SID A 9B•,BOX ff 106 N ND T1 ND kE FAA 1/2 OF LOR 5 AD 6 ff LIE PADEIT MAE SDDILINE A =6 ff 49254 10 A Fff1i W OE 1,Ig7 ff,N DWAN ff TE SWIIERLT BOLA6MY ff 1016 ff SAD FA WNWn FM WE /0DNT4 lw] IES 1D RET FAA ff W S°ImEST N6R ff SAD LD1 4 ➢EIR RM NB917g7 ADC TE Wm1EAT BOLA6WT ff SAD 1014 FTR A 06TAI L1 OO9N ff 16W FFFT N W 91ATEA CD66A ff SW 1 4 Wa DD 1D015'Mt AM TE Q 8U Mf ff SID 1014 A DW0 W 2251 FQT TO M PRR ff MWM L2 N 10 SHEET 1 OF 2 =mw IAIZ WIWE FEET W 711 Aacs, 110AE W m U WE .615 F A r aNr 2s i 0 2p M 60 _..— GRA PHIC SCALE LEGEND 20 ®- w NAI610E PONA POLE - OEREAD NNS O _ OD11 PDE TREES m 1 mP�OE .— ♦ - PNN M • --•- -• - TOP ff 8Aw An YEmE 116E —9 - OAS' DPAKAM - w1Eit WE D� 1 a - N6�TRN�t1N11 PIE iRF o - w� E .l9 - W � ®- wTA 1ETFA BROOKWOOD 1N149A IRE � °� ° T TERRACE a - YAD]LI TH 0 _FHA ffilC wINW R6T 1 Ee RLAR ME 0-M NSOR/PR ab EIERDHN iNE . - BIO( FM PREIFMAA - u4 LNAIVE DE SO SllFiYEY ABBfirYlA71OP6 � M :raevaw v e w�m u.0 m�A; xEm®A�ou r�m�' xa�iwa°s.vF Fv v.mo.n Nm smm Em GENERAL NOTES RwD ®o19Aa1 EE.d ws RVDDN HOd[d DwR A xoxvA NRH DAPP A66NA IUAW1dS wE lA1ImILNGW O�G> � Ar [.oEa°w rHans Ns sEVCwiNxdy N�FxI �Fm HnIC1 WF a m IaA� omr u sod IDmA A W!a /mAM1 G41FN61Y1fY -dA M001tA W1�aa�. FIIE YMd Mp wTE DN 1®[ BA'>mSO1R LOPE ' 9lw I®l i dSa NA®IRab6xwAa Hx6uldRY fW ID DNIAL IxAIaDRRI®6 H M9 d16 H�iOYtY1An6 �w1 Ndq Y1 EI WOpISd H11O91i I. dxn6HN mo NON ADmcAV6w Nrt EVFa wmDAply Axr Ida 16F6 Ew0 H Sods SIe(gR Rrtu m6vl �ItB _ wF SUIE ®dnF m IHE x61 IDE IvN (m0 NtNA6ROl4 N 63iE9. N H W16NA �C 9AnR NL qlw 6 FlWIl YIN9IOGa.W OAH 9[ W.Dgf 16Ga 9lw IDFd NF N.NIDNA O/MII6A5, offs OAf11NE RAE6 �NAID�T __ ®TSE Y66f wn 94M Ha WEE Ed YHID ib H S H NE ROd IDE IFxR WSF E oFmSFm n xi uufex 16 9EFt' o1VP®ES IA�Im ¢ESHE d Eax OMBP. ii TFIE WxEAmwW NSFCPDE fA41D16 d0AR W1RNaE90 wl AF XPf 9DN. �IH¢TUwixmE m6F 9H0FI w l xE P 4p6v uN�"ifx'NUFAAd IH.TD N NTNAn6q K W® �9MIA �- a' -wxaob m¢r. xoHGV xwFa -rtla Em uiE dH WWLaOEC Nx1'AKTl6)[F -AFFxH - N674ST61 A DSTNIR 7192.00 R E T 1D A Pffif TNT M 10 F EL T F A S T 7 11E SDFAIEST COB ff SAO A SIDIESR 71015 R W 17 AD,TE F A A , / E ff l 5 MD 6 OF TE PADRTT EAAT MMREM Ma RN L I N E D A T A MW1526 NOC A DE 10 iFEf FAA AD P/ANIEL TI 1H ESTERT BDIQOLY ff SID A 9B•,BOX ff 106 N ND T1 ND kE FAA 1/2 OF LOR 5 AD 6 ff LIE PADEIT MAE SDDILINE A =6 ff 49254 10 A Fff1i W OE 1,Ig7 ff,N DWAN ff TE SWIIERLT BOLA6MY ff 1016 ff SAD FA WNWn FM WE /0DNT4 lw] IES 1D RET FAA ff W S°ImEST N6R ff SAD LD1 4 ➢EIR RM NB917g7 ADC TE Wm1EAT BOLA6WT ff SAD 1014 FTR A 06TAI L1 OO9N ff 16W FFFT N W 91ATEA CD66A ff SW 1 4 Wa DD 1D015'Mt AM TE Q 8U Mf ff SID 1014 A DW0 W 2251 FQT TO M PRR ff MWM L2 N 10 SHEET 1 OF 2 =mw IAIZ WIWE FEET W 711 Aacs, 110AE W m U WE .615 F A r aNr SECTION 15, TWP. 29 S., RNGJ 15 E., PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA PAt Si g%E_'MliLC -��- - - - --- DREW mo�w� ------- �m- °- 'x-- - - - - -- 6 NLLR 9Ip'SL , ^I a i a �iF.A. Koamrs FAIR WE ADDITION so w \i'9 j p1 wa \' J xJ •J .•! i �_— H LE GmseHICzS A i 6 .. LEGEND ® _ I - - mW vain ..ok ]IOU y N� l I41 g ]I P YJ I BLOCK a O . OROE 0 ifi5 _ -8. J 5 i J s 6msu # �..— - TREES m Qg _ rcrc m Tm �r IE1FR °aE 7 I il'!O Is W ME TREE _�OfNWE NAMIDE .. 4 f.we .: Jes - curxm mE WE IXIE e AuSlxAW1 EIC iRFE {I .n nsx ME na TNEE —..� - I I ciy,. j *,�i x4 fi • i......R i I •'f .o -.9.0u n mx v - rye xlm rweoc wer - , .`.: s„ mnxsvn%NSxNE I o m .o usoou T6E . ®NT TTac v°. Tua IwN IsrANTm ' -- : ■ NOlIQOC NFLL m - - caE rvaNO sot uc mwAm uc nA .x m a. a y • B _ om i .. ash__ -..:. sn �. Y900W�S IF I ruse i i K w oW REVISED 9LdY OF NOOKWOOD r EROOKWIOW TRUCE � I BEWflICE j i •` iD .; J a vlmlam sao j J n.ofr�6aNn,� �n,�»max®.nNn�N�, mu,1%�a i J i � C$SiAL NM nr�r ®m. oN.� wsa.a xo®n,»E ann m mn mmo msnue a. a o.0 J j J J.s ,or,o '. � w�m'ANO'm_� �a ,annn�nrumnuanusw.wmsw,rxmmNm� IF- _ a �' 3 awf41an J i :ss ,j °'J I,� m�aer�onP isz«"`n.vs ows s+�.n«nono wFnc ncr. wK . , '� avE sTOer eaoc euaxc � i i l �,� ra v "• xre]A'x�v ni.mk Han �sna ne ssN.r ws �.%un x Nwn 6 w m%vise ss wr s =tea —..� �J i os %swemairomosmnnm%r erm®N ,. �m,�«oorm,saroNwN.m.n%nxm.NT j ! Sg ✓;� i ®Hum.my; ..— ..— .. —.. —. —. — .. —..— fJ f-0. I rAUU %Nail minas mfila""%m ee oc x'roO°. �a�vrai. �u" 2a e.ac Ia nrsun NNm wusos Ns mo sc rTVNOn u�umN Nn. N.� NN g �d �mcuau¢u�muemm xox M1I � zi °.'� P® b �xn3 Nn�agYEmfAr mOa.�mN WO �B: afnf6]mm9OmL • ,,,,, J � I �..— r. ° °� �u�wanaaasvrcnNwNrrortan•N.Pix - .tI I .• — . O r, ; .� - - -- -a . iidYfxi ' . -- _-- -- --- ------------ ------------------ J " I ' - awsc`mo��a�.i.woo.>wN�s �s �NP�� N lnNmnz, n x n .� w.� n °sNn w°�u1 ir.om imso .fm a.m WA - -- ------ -- -f- a•�aar lc� ca a roe HNEa� mmn wTTE E asmw %6Filcrm m - - -- ------ - -- --- ----- - - -- -- -- ® a- - -- YCq - -- -- - - - - - -- m LAT ft I 3/2W7 m s MW d SRW D SHEET 2 OF 2 P�1FfiM ; ®�' °wa uvne�crer� nvrnxroxe� �1 LAW srcwcrraes uw nANAVU 9�A N)>S AWN nM(IOfW En H/1'L�.f��//MG71 .rRH/ f fl<W N� nm m 18.H /96? /°2f/ °Ihfrllr /1l /7n/ iK -116 V, S-M�WE R:off 3 2 .41 4, alli'm All, 3 . . . . . . . 6 ..41 ��FJL MMMY.4 FM 11 um Awrm I3 I wIl!. V114 MN Irj' 5 KEUErS sumvpHIM 15. 7 7 SECTION 15, TWP. 29 S., RNC. 15 E., PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA ®6 4 D 0 i 20 60 GRAPHICS 41 A FK0M OF Im5 I ➢FAM 4 WkCSED PLAI CF 9MM TURP&. M I== N PLAT SM t 6a T PACE X IF If PIM WM T RtllAi CM11M. rlRaa MEM NIX A � 61 M I IIM L FA WMn FAIR M AMMOK AS RE03M IN PUT M 11, PMX Ia. 61K R" MM T RaW IMM. MM 111M M PiMVAT =M IS (01101& anew AT x m" 1/4 con Of sm I% mww 7 SIM Will Is Ew+ ma M SUMUT NM IK H" � T W � IS MM.M CF MM Rn *M M M w % A 051IX T � M M M WWW�M � T KalM RI 4 U[M)'N PIE M 11, PAM 14, T K M= MM W PlGW WAM, M"' Ma MA SWUMt A M7MM OF � FEET M IW NMWKV CWJG OF FA M.CM FM LAW ADMIX $S MUM M UT BU 11, PAM K IF BE MIX MM W MMM M". 2 APARnmas amk W) � � Im m � T sn"m � " Ivn � w � BUGAM OF SM FA ODOM FAR M MVM M WM PUT OF WWM M&M AS p CO-OP MW M JUT M A P� X W M IF R=k A =MM M MMIn XW K M � T SW W� JUT T MMM 10RUE A MWIll OF SM FEEr 10 If MEAST MRO OF WT G. OF SAID SM I MW NAT T WWM IMML DIDU " MWM0 AM M SWHXT BMWART W W LDT IS W IIS 113MILY DMQX A m MCE IT DLO FM M A Pm1T 011 IC VMXY WJV A W FA KD.CM AM Wt BENS M NMIM N ➢E>FSf WMNT T FA MICM FA LAW AMnM A MM4M OF MIM FM 10 ➢K FMIT (F HMM CM WED M" MOW FM M is A= Un M M 41 JJ M AM OMM MFGM WMAM M BE III M X III MMMM � Of M W OF Of CV (F UIDWRIM aMUM PAI& 12M VIM K%W I2)=-MWIt W* MM MY 17, i5 sw 3 7 OINm CLUB WM ur SUM ASNEVATM TREES un — IS; e MMED PLAT OF'-. �Iwaa PK mm BROOKWOOD TERRACE all � BE 41 5 io cma KE ENUKRID W MoNviow MM 3 Tomm CEN90L NOTS L E G E N 0 VA*0LE % IW OYCKA an RM sc. --! 13 Wo p" Worm - WALIM yS M MTER V&%E 0: IATE MIC MIN 3dK 2 .1m wa 1 =M-4 0 1-a RM PREWM Ill C'. VA" It I MAXIM u BOMAW AM TOPOMMM SW&-f Property Appraiser General Information: 15/29/15/65250/002 /0010 Card 1 Page 1 of 4 Interactive Mai of tivs Comparab.le_5ales Back to uez New Tam Collector Question/Conunent about this parcel Listing Results Search Information parcel 15/29/15/65250/002 /0010 Building-2-of f 5 Building 1 Data Current as of February 22, 2009 [5:31 pm Sunday February 22] Nonresidential Property Owner, Address, and Sales Print Warehouse Property Ilse: 332 PADGETT'S ESTATES SUB BLK B, LOTS 1 THRU 10 INCL TOGETHER WITH S 29.2FT OF LOT 8 & ALL OF LOT 9 OF FAIR LANE ADD ALSO TOGETHER WITH LOTS 7 THRU 10 INCL & 13 THRU 18 INCL OF BLK 3, BROOKWOOD TERRACE REVISED (PER OR'S 3003/381, 3008/542, 4130/ 1755 & 4287/825) ** Click here for short legal ** 2008 Exemptions Homestead: No Use: 0% Ownership: 0% Tax Exempt: 0% Government: No Institutional: No Agricultural: $0 Historic: $0 2008 Value 2008 Tax Information Comparable Sales Value:: $0 Tax District: CWD Building Value per F.S. Millage: 21.3229 553.844 Just/Market Value: $7,800,000 Non Ad Valorem Assessments: $.00 Assessed. Value/ SOH Cap: $7,800,000 Taxes: $166,319.00 History Taxable Value: $7,800,000 Taxes without Save - Our -Homes cap: $166,319.00 A. significant taxable value increase may Taxes without any exemptions: $166,319.00 occur when sold. Click here for details. Owner /Mailing Address GTE FLORIDA INC C/O PROPERTY TAX SECTION PO BOX 152206 IRVING TX 75015 -2206 Property Address 1280 CLEVELAND ST Parcel Information Book/Page: Land Use: Office. 03008/0542 buildings, no... (18Y Census Tract: 264.00 Sale Date Book/Page Price Q//U V/I No Recent Sales Plat Year Plat Book/Page(s) 1924 006/059 http:// www. pcpao.org/general_nadet.php ?pn= 1529156525000200101 2/22/2009 Property Appraiser General Information: 15/29/15/65250/002 /0010 Card 1 Seawall: Land Information Frontage: None Land Use Office buildings, non - professional service build ... Office buildings, non - professional service build ... 18 Foundation: Special Footing Floor System: Slab on Grade Exterior Wall: Concrete Block Brick Roof Frame: Reinforced Concrete Roof Cover: Built -up Metal/Gypsum Height Factor: 0 Floor Finish: Concrete Finish Interior Finish: None Party wall: None Structural Frame: Concrete Reinforced Cabinet & Mill: None Quality: Average Heating & Air: Cooling with Ducts Electric: Average Bath Tile: None Fixtures: 0 Total Units: 0 Year Built: 1971 Effective Age: 25 Other Depreciation: 0 Functional Depreciation: 10 Economic Depreciation: 0 Page 2 of 4 View: Land Unit. Units Method Size Value 12.00 62,638.31 S Structural Elements 6.50 86,251.69 S No Building Drawing for this card http: / /www.pcpao.org/general _ nadet.php ?pn= 1529156525000200101 2/22/2009 Property Appraiser General Information: 15/29/15/65250/002 /0010 Card 1 Sub Area information Description Building Finished Ft2 Gross Area Ft2 ;Base Area 1,344 1,344 Total Building Finished SF: 1,344 Total Gross SF: 1,344 Nonresidential Extra Features Description Dimensions Value/Unit Units Total NewValue No Extra Features on Record Page 3 of 4 Factor Effective F12 1.00 1,344 Total Effective SF: 1,344 Depreciated Value Year http:// www. pcpao.org/general_nadet.php ?pn= 1529156525000200101 2/22/2009 Welcome to VDB on the Web � Pan Tool . Zoom Taal lltodaw Tuo1 Aerial Photography: 12007 Color Transparency (0.0 -rn-7- Theme his is the default set. It has no data yers, just linework. All of the map yers are black. Page 1 of 1 ' e .l .� JtL�. � 4 � !'s•. ~�,� � -� -'fir. �3�i � � it ��. te��>yl L �.a•.V Y �r 1% 1'i , -'mow Lod V i T w+ M � w -� ax *�,��� Y� •PUS �1 F I .a �'.`�. {w :.� � �' .!i , �jr .... Eby T j y ' ,r!�[7�lTe�lr: ; � �riL.'i►t•�i.� ��,� 4 ��:1U��1��C �� ����. ' � l �f � r - .. 9 `" �+�,���ggQj'�j -�y �.1';% a •.F�e� T� �'G t� `S'`�� t'::�/1 - T i r,.. `R. f. :�f *'•�'i'1 p�" ` > E�'X`�51:I �� - �atP.'1 e'f r� / • '�r,_��l_ .�� - irQ� \'y .ii�� M � T.: I. _o 1'�' ., M•a�`f'h:�w"�`��4 = al1�Ilf'�i� �t� � - '�E:2- http: / /vdb.pcpao.org/vdb.php 2/22/2009 Property Appraiser General Information: 15/29/15/26658/000 /0010 Card 1 Page 1 of 3 lnteractive._Map of thus Back to_Que y New Tax_Collector (�uestionjComment about this parc.e.,,l Results Search Information parcel 15/29/15/26658/000 /0010 Data Current as of February 22, 2009 [5:33 pm Sunday February 22] Vacant Property Owner, Address, and Sales Print Property Use: 290 FAIR LANE ADD LOTS 1 THRU 7 & PT OF LOT 8 TOGETHER WITH LOTS 1 THRU 6, BLK 3 OF BROOKWOOD TERRACE REVISED ALL DESC BEG NW COR OF SD LOT 4, FAIR LANE ADD TH S89D21' 09'E 310.07FT TO NE COR BLK 3, BROOKWOOD TERRACE REVISED TH SOOD00'19'W 310.02FT TO SE COR OF LOT 6 BLK 3, BROOKWOOD TERRACE REVISED TH N89D22'14'W 311.44FT TO POINT ON W'LY BNDRY OF FAIR LANE ADD TH NOODI5'26'E 310.1OFT ALG W BNDRY TO POB ** Click here for short legal ** 2008 Exemptions Homestead: No Use: 0% Ownership: 0% Tax Exempt: 0% Government: No Institutional: No Agricultural: $0 Historic: $0 2008 Value 2008 Tax Information Comparable Sales Value:: $0 Tax District: CW_ Just /Market Value: $626,100 Millage: 20.3578 Assessed Value/ SOH Cap_..$626,100 Non Ad Valorem Assessments: $.00 History Taxable Value: $626,100 Taxes: $12,746.00 A significant taxable value increase may Taxes without Save - Our -Homes cap: $12,746.00 occur when sold. Click here for details. Taxes without any exemptions: $12,746.00 Owner /Mailing property Address Sale Date Book/Page Price QLV V/I Address 6/2008 16296/1326 $680,000 Q I S P COUNTRY CLUB HOMES LLC Plat Year Plat Book/Page(s) 2430 ESTANCIA BLVD 1925 011/016 STE 101 CLEARWATER FL 33761 -2607 Parcel Information Book/Page: Land Use: Vacant 16296/1326 Commercial (10) Census Tract: 264.00 Land Information Seawall: Frontage: None View: Land Use Land Size Unit Value Units Method Vacant Commercial(10) 6.50 96,352.70 S http: / /www.pcpao.org/general _ vadet.php ?pn= 152915266580000010 2/22/2009 Property Appraiser General Information: 15/29/15/26658/000 /0010 Card 1 Page 2 of 3 http: / /www.pcpao.org/general _ vadet.php ?pn= 152915266580000010 2/22/2009 Property Appraiser General Information: 15/29/15/26658/000 /0010 Card 1 Page 3 of 3 Interactive Map of this Back to QueU New Tax Collector Question/ Comment about this parcel Results Search Information pa_e http: / /www.pcpao.org/ general_ vadet.php ?pn = 152915266580000010 2/22/2009 Welcome to VDB on the Web Page 1 of 1 7t mat,, — r5 5 Dftq,St r 'vt St �e s Lk� :tI -Ild St St g' ry =`giC e 5T. _. f�ialn!JTtK ��rt3 Identity Tool Aerial Photography: 12007 Color Transparency (0.0- r Theme is the default set. It has no data s, just linework. All of the map s are black. http: / /vdb.pcpao.org /vdb.php 2/22/2009 IL 1/4 COINER IF SELHM IS, LOCAn01 OASES A ONF ED OCFM REFU ICES P.O:�S89TB56'E OF C ETS SIDN a 3 I I XIELLET'S (FIAT BOOK 11, RIO: N) Q I I I I I � I �� • xy� x� - "'_�� - - -- y0.` � x�r 26ti1.4D1' �' SB91B56'E i6ff -0 -UGLY WIN VME[ n --- - - - - -- 157155V ,J' -- do K 9•Y ff � Y4A (,� GA l�E➢YS � � "l- :t }ffi -17F/ , 0NB 1/ET yp V4E X101 d umr a -as maul an ... \ r v FKg} cY Umrt 4s ni,p p�{� 63,b�` F4a A0.� 9bY L�4 yi 'Vi J' N 1528'E 40004 --------- _ _____ tp - T 4D.OD'RC wR ____ 710.074: 7108 ImC) IZ 55100 5n S5400 P.O.B. ! N PA iE]WmED NN ff ,pp YS FAR yy y0. D.NS YAay ?e , LINE NOTOT AlA . I Y� dsd ISSN. m�iom�'mNAOE amS. I' d ?R 4 �� yss. c•� e,r x IR• yaQaf e+' d I r N NE 2WR d 2 a� dQ v_`1 LAW App # ON 14 I I I � I I' $ I 1 � I d0. I o L. � 1 � j i by" I fx ..1 � 0.•d 1. MY I A I/I' 12512 1 I sO I I wp I f alb. x�9 (ANwAn x0. %Hs xH� x¢0.'.. -_ -.. �d xD+ L ,r• �x am- SITE 'TBE'.. yN: 3i NET p .r• x[ n� x� 4p x� y0. zmT fAANn LOT k a= 63 yf v ~� x f �IDaROm meMa II d. ! 1: uxmrru,w AKT a i Mal xd,. xllp. t� ff aDO( 3. ff 91D0('10ED RRNACE SSR SSWO RB 0E °m�E anR HCE N x� SECTION 15, TWP. 29 S., RNG. 15 E., PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA HE MM _ DOOM WL o zo 0.0 so L GRAPHIC SCALE I. LEGAL DESCRIP A PORTION OF LOTS 1 MOM 5, BLOCK 3. REVISED PLAT OF BR MWOCU TERRACE, AS RECORDED N PLAT BOOK L PACE 34, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PNFIIAS COUNTY, FLORIDA _ Ax4'F01 TOGETHER Oft - - -- 59.66'4: SO'_R _ 1 - Tyd A PORTION OF LOTS 1 THOUGH B. F.A. KENNEDY'S FAR LANE MOIIKIN, AS RECORDED N RAT 600( 11, ®' �► 13� N1ET PAGE 16, OF THE PLIEIC RECORDS OF P9E1AS COUNTY. FLORIDA. v j� BERG MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: f1 COMMENCING AT RE NORTH 1/4 C08At OF SECTIOII 15, TONNSFP 29 SOUTH, RANGE 15 EAST; THENCE RUIN S8918^56'E ALONG THE NORTH BOUNDARY OF SAID SECTION 15, A DISTANCE OF 1,09185 FEET: THENCE I.,. RUN =5'53'W. A DISTANCE OF 31.80 FEET TO OE NORTHEAST GORIER OF KUM 91BDN190N. AS RECORDED N RAT BOO( 11, PAGE 24, OF THE PUNIC RECORDS OF PNELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA; THENCE RUN 589D528'E, A DISTANCE O 4mw FEET TO THE NOITHIIEST CORER OF F.A. KEN EDYS FAR LANE i ADDITION, AS RECORDED N RAT BOOK 11, PAGE 16, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PNEL AS COUNTY, FLORIDA. SAID PORT ALSO SONG THE PONT OF BEGINNING. THENCE RUN SBM'DB'E ALONG THE NORTH BOUNDARIES OF SAID F.A. KENEDYS FAR LANE ADDITION AND REVISED PUT OF BROO(WOOD TERRACE, AS GULF RIAMOR RECORDED N RAT BOOK Q PACE 34, OF THE P UBLN: RECORDS OF PNEL AS COUNTY, RCA. A DISTANCE �' >c� QPQ�e4I�I�Qd4� OF 310.01 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF BLOOD 3, SAID REVISED RAT OF BROIKKOOD TERRACE: HENCE RUN SOOODIDrill ALONG THE EAST BOUDARY OF SAD BLOOD 3, REVISED PUT OF BROOKWOOD CO -CP TERRACE, A DISTANCE OF 310.02 FEET TO THE SOMEAST CORER OF LOT 6, OF SAD BLOCK 3, REVISED ® I RAT OF BROOKROOD TERRACE; THENCE RUN N897214 -W ALSO THE SOUTHERLY BOUNDARY OF SAID LOT 6 AND ITS WESTERLY E1(TEN SO. A DISTANCE OF 311.44 FEET TO A PONT ON THE WESTERLY WMARY OF (" I F.A. KENNEDY'S ADDIRM THENCE RUN WS!26'E ALM THE WEST BOUNDARY OF F.A.IONNNFDYS FAR LAZE AODDIOF, A DISTANCE OF 310.10 FEET TO THE POINT OF BECI NNm CONTAINING 96,349 SQUARE FEET OR 121 ACRq MOPE OR LESS I' THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY APPEARS M BE N ZONE K IN ACCORDANCE WDI THE FIRM MAP OF THE + CITY OF C EAR'WATER allRMTY PANE. 125096, MAP NUMBER 121030- 008-HI MAR REVISED MAY 17, 20M PD1,11 - PRPARED FOR VERQON FLORIDA LTC FFF SP COUNTRY CLUB HOES LLC CHICAGO RTRE INSURANCE MWANY CITY OF CLEARWATER dy HOLLAND & KNIGHT suNEY A68FIEVIATIONS s Y,t ��^�° ,T91:�ID[u[ v�91: �91Ak1A W40 'Fay Nay +w:AON'x�i � :osiNLa1E m } A -ax n0. PLwlw :,rcioa wN aNNv N0. - sNUO M -�rro ui 'ur. U-- mAei �.� Nam Rau uW 4:�� UI� m.�aAN1°°� xvN aaQmc w m: �1 .A.o o0. Na an me'. moWN 61110 ,amc .Nlrx oAnN Au ro¢ TREES:�vA i PN.11 TRICE - sov!.nmsnuoarnu I @ i°:v o.:6roarrmwr •a' {fly s+ - 'WILL T OW LE a soAVOn41�vr u : a v r.N a• - 0. TREE i¢ . r•n'a mnAO oAnc N/°INm CAMPHOR TREE • 0.x a N� n - su•n ms m rv"Vi. mue ar -..a AUSTRALIAN PINE TREE No - PINE TREE ov - PUNK TREE • LAO a m Lon s m:omar r. me uA n: �onAal ma MIMOSA TREE 0.D - MAGNOLIA TREE : w:mwATO moot uNAAm - rowN: Ne - CEDAR TREE 90 N0. - EVER(�EQN TREE . NIIRMATKNS MAY AIM BE CONCATENATED AS IEDINEC II a OTHER OLgLY CELLO® AND/OR NSFPTim A®EMATI NS ARE A131 UMOD BUT NOT SINGED HDEm BRO®GSf OOD CIEN6iAL NOTES TERRACE OM PAGE 1. UUM OIIFRWS STATED. TE PROPERTY OMWTIOI SOW HMON WAS WM BY TIE OENT• Ot DOTS (RAT e0u(4 PAAZ K) DENNATED AGENT. I : L E G E N D L LFODNNWD M RD"M NONWC MIT NOT LIMITED ID MIEDNG FONDATIMA HAVE NOT DEER LOCATED 901FT AS 91011 HELM VEREZON MANHOLE 1 NA ®E ABLE OIOIID I RDMOM (E.G. pODNG OMNINK$ TIM WHIN BONED AWAY ETC), RAVE • POWER POE NOT BON LOCATED DKEPT AS SOM HUM - POWER 'O WITS 4. WEE OMM STATER THIS SURE:Y WAS REPINED MNOIT THE ®EAT ff A MIRE SEARCH AID MY BE SIBELT TO AmROU. EASOBII& INORQ -MiD. AND OTHER MATI06 OF RE079 j G - LICIT POLE S THERE All NO MOUE FNOD/C MNTIS DCPT AS SHOW HE EDFL [. IM - ROAD 9TH 6 BECAUSE OF THE P®TIT OF TA/EOFNT OF THE MIAlENTAT ON FMN I13 MORAL M ACWENT BY POWs 91 - METER POLE ORES THAN THE SRMTR, IT IS Of7LBOED THAT PRIOR D ANY NEV 1NI0,4WTS ON THE PRO1.5 Y x--r-w - TOP OF BANK HIE PC6MI ff THE W AMNTATION ff '.FRED. 4t �1gg INN THOlm CUES ND/M IEPIKID 0006 MA ANY IEAM ff D6 DOCUMENT CE ANY WDION BEBOP GUY 'WIRE ARE WMMY RD6RD OW THE WIND 9EMYWS WTKTTFN WaEXT. ®- DRAINAGE MANHOLE E WAVED WANDS ARE N REFERENCE TO RCDA STATE RIME 000OM11 OD NORTH, NEST ZOE NW7H Cb - WATER VALVE MEIBRLaIDRyDATUM OP IMT (1900 HFACUSHENT), AS ESTABHED BY THE NATIONAL MEND SMEY. Dt -GATE VALVE y4il A Rj O4NN1 10 BOUNDARY IN4 W 4 STATED. SOAR IET®I NE - BOU.ARO 10p RZO, ZONE WOM MION' AND/OR RXID Z0E OOP (i ANYJ 9MKN IETECHI 1NMi aFN 9UlM FROM THE ® -WATER METER /,[p' +A i MAP A10 NE NiR011ATE R£ iq,E RDM ZONE LN9 MIST ff DEADENED BY AN DINED. LOCK a - OEARWT /yW° T llEl)F %TEZ- FARId 5 M OREA WPDS C RECOID NT NE D SOAR FIBER OPPCi AR HNC- T IDivT tleSi tNT' ff etc wt� o' INS murtY.. Tf - FIRE AYORXINT,U�y� E�SBSRF,_ _ IMiY IyG _SjlNll HEREON A E Bl3D M URfIY DDIFAIIOI RN,DfD BY ffMASflI✓S NC O - UO '�✓ . ` E'. AN i1a�NrD?IOg7)REE• tWSIiF' KWAY ff OEM SWEET. AND I E FAST RENT -OF-MY OF WIT LANE BFI. - BA OW PREVENRER . ~` 14. OEYAIIOKS •14910NMi(1E01 ,BE M D !N10UE ODIETC 9lM1EYS MMNN ?ERE IV AT Nql THE 4 0 - MONN)iiTEDNG'NElI. ° DEYAtxx s fEPME$ AS {4A{jj$t gTgg737 F�ETiN,AVnID. aap I D - ChABBT�<EE NARNING SIGNF p�fdA �pyl,)' ��pp��yy��pp/�L ppLL��. �y p��y r F -D- - U (p°, DRAINAGE UNE • _ � . 4' IV111.4 TOPOGRAP N A7llF1WC L 4I` NASD DEVA71O6 M TO/m= (OrO77ADWG) IE115ED IST MUNDARY. Wff- -DIY FASf1FNi a 12/13/A0/ (m01rIA-201c) ' ADDED IMOC i.TO W"DATKNS M OK/OS1700E (07017MINi) Ig gI: g r" iuAHAry r A'I O4 -SINE TBHN F,7 NAa- nrllrun LAAan _ N SET Nkt ..- ..- .. -.. -.. IIOIt .. -.. _.. -.. -. R x� x's x y- (A�n p ..- .- .._m�pg -gg �p p -,,ppFF��_ __ g o g b. e.BW WED, K &T N!D ' +x ,• .y0. BR WOOD TERRACE +1 (RAT BOOK B PAC 34) 'L � �• 0.r S � ay ®CGS 3 '� r• ..- ..- ..- ..- ..- ..__...- .. -_ -. Vim" �� tiDR• ai' x� xAd x y� a PANTY 1 'I S. BIDY ff :• RtM1; 3fORC. / NOT 0 a i nn' MTE an dy, r° [AAwp a- _.x ..� � r• ro? xot SE. OF �x ' 1 � � a'4r 1 I O aa9 y ON-SDE 7BLI A 3 44 3. a I: T T>o A A r rJ s sd � �! I ' .s f fb n n•t 'R x ' • y ype I I'� I I � �•a ¢ ¢y1 r r• I I i F F x �s ON-SITE T TBM + sv y- x SET NH + s I I I � I I' $ I 1 � I d0. I o L. � 1 � j i by" I fx ..1 � 0.•d 1. MY I A I/I' 12512 1 I sO I I wp I f alb. x�9 (ANwAn x0. %Hs xH� x¢0.'.. -_ -.. �d xD+ L ,r• �x am- SITE 'TBE'.. yN: 3i NET p .r• x[ n� x� 4p x� y0. zmT fAANn LOT k a= 63 yf v ~� x f �IDaROm meMa II d. ! 1: uxmrru,w AKT a i Mal xd,. xllp. t� ff aDO( 3. ff 91D0('10ED RRNACE SSR SSWO RB 0E °m�E anR HCE N x� SECTION 15, TWP. 29 S., RNG. 15 E., PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA HE MM _ DOOM WL o zo 0.0 so L GRAPHIC SCALE I. LEGAL DESCRIP A PORTION OF LOTS 1 MOM 5, BLOCK 3. REVISED PLAT OF BR MWOCU TERRACE, AS RECORDED N PLAT BOOK L PACE 34, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PNFIIAS COUNTY, FLORIDA _ Ax4'F01 TOGETHER Oft - - -- 59.66'4: SO'_R _ 1 - Tyd A PORTION OF LOTS 1 THOUGH B. F.A. KENNEDY'S FAR LANE MOIIKIN, AS RECORDED N RAT 600( 11, ®' �► 13� N1ET PAGE 16, OF THE PLIEIC RECORDS OF P9E1AS COUNTY. FLORIDA. v j� BERG MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: f1 COMMENCING AT RE NORTH 1/4 C08At OF SECTIOII 15, TONNSFP 29 SOUTH, RANGE 15 EAST; THENCE RUIN S8918^56'E ALONG THE NORTH BOUNDARY OF SAID SECTION 15, A DISTANCE OF 1,09185 FEET: THENCE I.,. RUN =5'53'W. A DISTANCE OF 31.80 FEET TO OE NORTHEAST GORIER OF KUM 91BDN190N. AS RECORDED N RAT BOO( 11, PAGE 24, OF THE PUNIC RECORDS OF PNELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA; THENCE RUN 589D528'E, A DISTANCE O 4mw FEET TO THE NOITHIIEST CORER OF F.A. KEN EDYS FAR LANE i ADDITION, AS RECORDED N RAT BOOK 11, PAGE 16, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PNEL AS COUNTY, FLORIDA. SAID PORT ALSO SONG THE PONT OF BEGINNING. THENCE RUN SBM'DB'E ALONG THE NORTH BOUNDARIES OF SAID F.A. KENEDYS FAR LANE ADDITION AND REVISED PUT OF BROO(WOOD TERRACE, AS GULF RIAMOR RECORDED N RAT BOOK Q PACE 34, OF THE P UBLN: RECORDS OF PNEL AS COUNTY, RCA. A DISTANCE �' >c� QPQ�e4I�I�Qd4� OF 310.01 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF BLOOD 3, SAID REVISED RAT OF BROIKKOOD TERRACE: HENCE RUN SOOODIDrill ALONG THE EAST BOUDARY OF SAD BLOOD 3, REVISED PUT OF BROOKWOOD CO -CP TERRACE, A DISTANCE OF 310.02 FEET TO THE SOMEAST CORER OF LOT 6, OF SAD BLOCK 3, REVISED ® I RAT OF BROOKROOD TERRACE; THENCE RUN N897214 -W ALSO THE SOUTHERLY BOUNDARY OF SAID LOT 6 AND ITS WESTERLY E1(TEN SO. A DISTANCE OF 311.44 FEET TO A PONT ON THE WESTERLY WMARY OF (" I F.A. KENNEDY'S ADDIRM THENCE RUN WS!26'E ALM THE WEST BOUNDARY OF F.A.IONNNFDYS FAR LAZE AODDIOF, A DISTANCE OF 310.10 FEET TO THE POINT OF BECI NNm CONTAINING 96,349 SQUARE FEET OR 121 ACRq MOPE OR LESS I' THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY APPEARS M BE N ZONE K IN ACCORDANCE WDI THE FIRM MAP OF THE + CITY OF C EAR'WATER allRMTY PANE. 125096, MAP NUMBER 121030- 008-HI MAR REVISED MAY 17, 20M PD1,11 - PRPARED FOR VERQON FLORIDA LTC FFF SP COUNTRY CLUB HOES LLC CHICAGO RTRE INSURANCE MWANY CITY OF CLEARWATER dy HOLLAND & KNIGHT suNEY A68FIEVIATIONS s Y,t ��^�° ,T91:�ID[u[ v�91: �91Ak1A W40 'Fay Nay +w:AON'x�i � :osiNLa1E m } A -ax n0. PLwlw :,rcioa wN aNNv N0. - sNUO M -�rro ui 'ur. U-- mAei �.� Nam Rau uW 4:�� UI� m.�aAN1°°� xvN aaQmc w m: �1 .A.o o0. Na an me'. moWN 61110 ,amc .Nlrx oAnN Au ro¢ TREES:�vA i PN.11 TRICE - sov!.nmsnuoarnu I @ i°:v o.:6roarrmwr •a' {fly s+ - 'WILL T OW LE a soAVOn41�vr u : a v r.N a• - 0. TREE i¢ . r•n'a mnAO oAnc N/°INm CAMPHOR TREE • 0.x a N� n - su•n ms m rv"Vi. mue ar -..a AUSTRALIAN PINE TREE No - PINE TREE ov - PUNK TREE • LAO a m Lon s m:omar r. me uA n: �onAal ma MIMOSA TREE 0.D - MAGNOLIA TREE : w:mwATO moot uNAAm - rowN: Ne - CEDAR TREE 90 N0. - EVER(�EQN TREE . NIIRMATKNS MAY AIM BE CONCATENATED AS IEDINEC II a OTHER OLgLY CELLO® AND/OR NSFPTim A®EMATI NS ARE A131 UMOD BUT NOT SINGED HDEm BRO®GSf OOD CIEN6iAL NOTES TERRACE OM PAGE 1. UUM OIIFRWS STATED. TE PROPERTY OMWTIOI SOW HMON WAS WM BY TIE OENT• Ot DOTS (RAT e0u(4 PAAZ K) DENNATED AGENT. I : L E G E N D L LFODNNWD M RD"M NONWC MIT NOT LIMITED ID MIEDNG FONDATIMA HAVE NOT DEER LOCATED 901FT AS 91011 HELM VEREZON MANHOLE 1 NA ®E ABLE OIOIID I RDMOM (E.G. pODNG OMNINK$ TIM WHIN BONED AWAY ETC), RAVE • POWER POE NOT BON LOCATED DKEPT AS SOM HUM - POWER 'O WITS 4. WEE OMM STATER THIS SURE:Y WAS REPINED MNOIT THE ®EAT ff A MIRE SEARCH AID MY BE SIBELT TO AmROU. EASOBII& INORQ -MiD. AND OTHER MATI06 OF RE079 j G - LICIT POLE S THERE All NO MOUE FNOD/C MNTIS DCPT AS SHOW HE EDFL [. IM - ROAD 9TH 6 BECAUSE OF THE P®TIT OF TA/EOFNT OF THE MIAlENTAT ON FMN I13 MORAL M ACWENT BY POWs 91 - METER POLE ORES THAN THE SRMTR, IT IS Of7LBOED THAT PRIOR D ANY NEV 1NI0,4WTS ON THE PRO1.5 Y x--r-w - TOP OF BANK HIE PC6MI ff THE W AMNTATION ff '.FRED. 4t �1gg INN THOlm CUES ND/M IEPIKID 0006 MA ANY IEAM ff D6 DOCUMENT CE ANY WDION BEBOP GUY 'WIRE ARE WMMY RD6RD OW THE WIND 9EMYWS WTKTTFN WaEXT. ®- DRAINAGE MANHOLE E WAVED WANDS ARE N REFERENCE TO RCDA STATE RIME 000OM11 OD NORTH, NEST ZOE NW7H Cb - WATER VALVE MEIBRLaIDRyDATUM OP IMT (1900 HFACUSHENT), AS ESTABHED BY THE NATIONAL MEND SMEY. Dt -GATE VALVE y4il A Rj O4NN1 10 BOUNDARY IN4 W 4 STATED. SOAR IET®I NE - BOU.ARO 10p RZO, ZONE WOM MION' AND/OR RXID Z0E OOP (i ANYJ 9MKN IETECHI 1NMi aFN 9UlM FROM THE ® -WATER METER /,[p' +A i MAP A10 NE NiR011ATE R£ iq,E RDM ZONE LN9 MIST ff DEADENED BY AN DINED. LOCK a - OEARWT /yW° T llEl)F %TEZ- FARId 5 M OREA WPDS C RECOID NT NE D SOAR FIBER OPPCi AR HNC- T IDivT tleSi tNT' ff etc wt� o' INS murtY.. Tf - FIRE AYORXINT,U�y� E�SBSRF,_ _ IMiY IyG _SjlNll HEREON A E Bl3D M URfIY DDIFAIIOI RN,DfD BY ffMASflI✓S NC O - UO '�✓ . ` E'. AN i1a�NrD?IOg7)REE• tWSIiF' KWAY ff OEM SWEET. AND I E FAST RENT -OF-MY OF WIT LANE BFI. - BA OW PREVENRER . ~` 14. OEYAIIOKS •14910NMi(1E01 ,BE M D !N10UE ODIETC 9lM1EYS MMNN ?ERE IV AT Nql THE 4 0 - MONN)iiTEDNG'NElI. ° DEYAtxx s fEPME$ AS {4A{jj$t gTgg737 F�ETiN,AVnID. aap I D - ChABBT�<EE NARNING SIGNF p�fdA �pyl,)' ��pp��yy��pp/�L ppLL��. �y p��y r F -D- - U (p°, DRAINAGE UNE • _ � . 4' IV111.4 TOPOGRAP N A7llF1WC L 4I` NASD DEVA71O6 M TO/m= (OrO77ADWG) IE115ED IST MUNDARY. Wff- -DIY FASf1FNi a 12/13/A0/ (m01rIA-201c) ' ADDED IMOC i.TO W"DATKNS M OK/OS1700E (07017MINi) Ig gI: g r" iuAHAry r A'I O4 -SINE TBHN F,7 NAa- nrllrun LAAan _ N SET Nkt ..- ..- .. -.. -.. IIOIt .. -.. _.. -.. -. R x� x's x y- (A�n p ..- .- .._m�pg -gg �p p -,,ppFF��_ __ g o g b. e.BW WED, K &T N!D ' +x ,• .y0. BR WOOD TERRACE +1 (RAT BOOK B PAC 34) 'L � �• 0.r S � ay ®CGS 3 '� r• ..- ..- ..- ..- ..- ..__...- .. -_ -. Vim" �� tiDR• ai' x� xAd x y� a PANTY 1 'I S. BIDY ff :• RtM1; 3fORC. / NOT 0 a i nn' MTE an dy, r° [AAwp a- _.x ..� � r• ro? xot SE. OF �x fx ..1 � 0.•d 1. MY I A I/I' 12512 1 I sO I I wp I f alb. x�9 (ANwAn x0. %Hs xH� x¢0.'.. -_ -.. �d xD+ L ,r• �x am- SITE 'TBE'.. yN: 3i NET p .r• x[ n� x� 4p x� y0. zmT fAANn LOT k a= 63 yf v ~� x f �IDaROm meMa II d. ! 1: uxmrru,w AKT a i Mal xd,. xllp. t� ff aDO( 3. ff 91D0('10ED RRNACE SSR SSWO RB 0E °m�E anR HCE N x� SECTION 15, TWP. 29 S., RNG. 15 E., PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA HE MM _ DOOM WL o zo 0.0 so L GRAPHIC SCALE I. LEGAL DESCRIP A PORTION OF LOTS 1 MOM 5, BLOCK 3. REVISED PLAT OF BR MWOCU TERRACE, AS RECORDED N PLAT BOOK L PACE 34, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PNFIIAS COUNTY, FLORIDA _ Ax4'F01 TOGETHER Oft - - -- 59.66'4: SO'_R _ 1 - Tyd A PORTION OF LOTS 1 THOUGH B. F.A. KENNEDY'S FAR LANE MOIIKIN, AS RECORDED N RAT 600( 11, ®' �► 13� N1ET PAGE 16, OF THE PLIEIC RECORDS OF P9E1AS COUNTY. FLORIDA. v j� BERG MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: f1 COMMENCING AT RE NORTH 1/4 C08At OF SECTIOII 15, TONNSFP 29 SOUTH, RANGE 15 EAST; THENCE RUIN S8918^56'E ALONG THE NORTH BOUNDARY OF SAID SECTION 15, A DISTANCE OF 1,09185 FEET: THENCE I.,. RUN =5'53'W. A DISTANCE OF 31.80 FEET TO OE NORTHEAST GORIER OF KUM 91BDN190N. AS RECORDED N RAT BOO( 11, PAGE 24, OF THE PUNIC RECORDS OF PNELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA; THENCE RUN 589D528'E, A DISTANCE O 4mw FEET TO THE NOITHIIEST CORER OF F.A. KEN EDYS FAR LANE i ADDITION, AS RECORDED N RAT BOOK 11, PAGE 16, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PNEL AS COUNTY, FLORIDA. SAID PORT ALSO SONG THE PONT OF BEGINNING. THENCE RUN SBM'DB'E ALONG THE NORTH BOUNDARIES OF SAID F.A. KENEDYS FAR LANE ADDITION AND REVISED PUT OF BROO(WOOD TERRACE, AS GULF RIAMOR RECORDED N RAT BOOK Q PACE 34, OF THE P UBLN: RECORDS OF PNEL AS COUNTY, RCA. A DISTANCE �' >c� QPQ�e4I�I�Qd4� OF 310.01 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF BLOOD 3, SAID REVISED RAT OF BROIKKOOD TERRACE: HENCE RUN SOOODIDrill ALONG THE EAST BOUDARY OF SAD BLOOD 3, REVISED PUT OF BROOKWOOD CO -CP TERRACE, A DISTANCE OF 310.02 FEET TO THE SOMEAST CORER OF LOT 6, OF SAD BLOCK 3, REVISED ® I RAT OF BROOKROOD TERRACE; THENCE RUN N897214 -W ALSO THE SOUTHERLY BOUNDARY OF SAID LOT 6 AND ITS WESTERLY E1(TEN SO. A DISTANCE OF 311.44 FEET TO A PONT ON THE WESTERLY WMARY OF (" I F.A. KENNEDY'S ADDIRM THENCE RUN WS!26'E ALM THE WEST BOUNDARY OF F.A.IONNNFDYS FAR LAZE AODDIOF, A DISTANCE OF 310.10 FEET TO THE POINT OF BECI NNm CONTAINING 96,349 SQUARE FEET OR 121 ACRq MOPE OR LESS I' THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY APPEARS M BE N ZONE K IN ACCORDANCE WDI THE FIRM MAP OF THE + CITY OF C EAR'WATER allRMTY PANE. 125096, MAP NUMBER 121030- 008-HI MAR REVISED MAY 17, 20M PD1,11 - PRPARED FOR VERQON FLORIDA LTC FFF SP COUNTRY CLUB HOES LLC CHICAGO RTRE INSURANCE MWANY CITY OF CLEARWATER dy HOLLAND & KNIGHT suNEY A68FIEVIATIONS s Y,t ��^�° ,T91:�ID[u[ v�91: �91Ak1A W40 'Fay Nay +w:AON'x�i � :osiNLa1E m } A -ax n0. PLwlw :,rcioa wN aNNv N0. - sNUO M -�rro ui 'ur. U-- mAei �.� Nam Rau uW 4:�� UI� m.�aAN1°°� xvN aaQmc w m: �1 .A.o o0. Na an me'. moWN 61110 ,amc .Nlrx oAnN Au ro¢ TREES:�vA i PN.11 TRICE - sov!.nmsnuoarnu I @ i°:v o.:6roarrmwr •a' {fly s+ - 'WILL T OW LE a soAVOn41�vr u : a v r.N a• - 0. TREE i¢ . r•n'a mnAO oAnc N/°INm CAMPHOR TREE • 0.x a N� n - su•n ms m rv"Vi. mue ar -..a AUSTRALIAN PINE TREE No - PINE TREE ov - PUNK TREE • LAO a m Lon s m:omar r. me uA n: �onAal ma MIMOSA TREE 0.D - MAGNOLIA TREE : w:mwATO moot uNAAm - rowN: Ne - CEDAR TREE 90 N0. - EVER(�EQN TREE . NIIRMATKNS MAY AIM BE CONCATENATED AS IEDINEC II a OTHER OLgLY CELLO® AND/OR NSFPTim A®EMATI NS ARE A131 UMOD BUT NOT SINGED HDEm BRO®GSf OOD CIEN6iAL NOTES TERRACE OM PAGE 1. UUM OIIFRWS STATED. TE PROPERTY OMWTIOI SOW HMON WAS WM BY TIE OENT• Ot DOTS (RAT e0u(4 PAAZ K) DENNATED AGENT. I : L E G E N D L LFODNNWD M RD"M NONWC MIT NOT LIMITED ID MIEDNG FONDATIMA HAVE NOT DEER LOCATED 901FT AS 91011 HELM VEREZON MANHOLE 1 NA ®E ABLE OIOIID I RDMOM (E.G. pODNG OMNINK$ TIM WHIN BONED AWAY ETC), RAVE • POWER POE NOT BON LOCATED DKEPT AS SOM HUM - POWER 'O WITS 4. WEE OMM STATER THIS SURE:Y WAS REPINED MNOIT THE ®EAT ff A MIRE SEARCH AID MY BE SIBELT TO AmROU. EASOBII& INORQ -MiD. AND OTHER MATI06 OF RE079 j G - LICIT POLE S THERE All NO MOUE FNOD/C MNTIS DCPT AS SHOW HE EDFL [. IM - ROAD 9TH 6 BECAUSE OF THE P®TIT OF TA/EOFNT OF THE MIAlENTAT ON FMN I13 MORAL M ACWENT BY POWs 91 - METER POLE ORES THAN THE SRMTR, IT IS Of7LBOED THAT PRIOR D ANY NEV 1NI0,4WTS ON THE PRO1.5 Y x--r-w - TOP OF BANK HIE PC6MI ff THE W AMNTATION ff '.FRED. 4t �1gg INN THOlm CUES ND/M IEPIKID 0006 MA ANY IEAM ff D6 DOCUMENT CE ANY WDION BEBOP GUY 'WIRE ARE WMMY RD6RD OW THE WIND 9EMYWS WTKTTFN WaEXT. ®- DRAINAGE MANHOLE E WAVED WANDS ARE N REFERENCE TO RCDA STATE RIME 000OM11 OD NORTH, NEST ZOE NW7H Cb - WATER VALVE MEIBRLaIDRyDATUM OP IMT (1900 HFACUSHENT), AS ESTABHED BY THE NATIONAL MEND SMEY. Dt -GATE VALVE y4il A Rj O4NN1 10 BOUNDARY IN4 W 4 STATED. SOAR IET®I NE - BOU.ARO 10p RZO, ZONE WOM MION' AND/OR RXID Z0E OOP (i ANYJ 9MKN IETECHI 1NMi aFN 9UlM FROM THE ® -WATER METER /,[p' +A i MAP A10 NE NiR011ATE R£ iq,E RDM ZONE LN9 MIST ff DEADENED BY AN DINED. LOCK a - OEARWT /yW° T llEl)F %TEZ- FARId 5 M OREA WPDS C RECOID NT NE D SOAR FIBER OPPCi AR HNC- T IDivT tleSi tNT' ff etc wt� o' INS murtY.. Tf - FIRE AYORXINT,U�y� E�SBSRF,_ _ IMiY IyG _SjlNll HEREON A E Bl3D M URfIY DDIFAIIOI RN,DfD BY ffMASflI✓S NC O - UO '�✓ . ` E'. AN i1a�NrD?IOg7)REE• tWSIiF' KWAY ff OEM SWEET. AND I E FAST RENT -OF-MY OF WIT LANE BFI. - BA OW PREVENRER . ~` 14. OEYAIIOKS •14910NMi(1E01 ,BE M D !N10UE ODIETC 9lM1EYS MMNN ?ERE IV AT Nql THE 4 0 - MONN)iiTEDNG'NElI. ° DEYAtxx s fEPME$ AS {4A{jj$t gTgg737 F�ETiN,AVnID. aap I D - ChABBT�<EE NARNING SIGNF p�fdA �pyl,)' ��pp��yy��pp/�L ppLL��. �y p��y r F -D- - U (p°, DRAINAGE UNE • _ � . 4' IV111.4 TOPOGRAP N A7llF1WC L 4I` NASD DEVA71O6 M TO/m= (OrO77ADWG) IE115ED IST MUNDARY. Wff- -DIY FASf1FNi a 12/13/A0/ (m01rIA-201c) ' ADDED IMOC i.TO W"DATKNS M OK/OS1700E (07017MINi) Ig gI: g r" iuAHAry r A'I O4 -SINE TBHN F,7 NAa- nrllrun LAAan _ N SET Nkt ..- ..- .. -.. -.. IIOIt .. -.. _.. -.. -. R x� x's x y- (A�n p ..- .- .._m�pg -gg �p p -,,ppFF��_ __ g o g b. e.BW WED, K &T N!D ' +x ,• .y0. BR WOOD TERRACE +1 (RAT BOOK B PAC 34) 'L � �• 0.r S � ay ®CGS 3 '� r• ..- ..- ..- ..- ..- ..__...- .. -_ -. Vim" �� tiDR• ai' x� xAd x y� a PANTY 1 'I S. BIDY ff :• RtM1; 3fORC. / NOT 0 a i nn' MTE an dy, r° [AAwp a- _.x ..� � r• ro? xot SE. OF �x PA ®OI�T�e3 ' SM ® ®o�o3u ®� iA�i� 41111 M Our R91x L PAff 59) , v - / 1- r L -- - <�_ -� - - - - - -® - iATOKI ------ - - - - -- '---------- - - - - -- -- � - - s -- r- ; --- - - - - -- a B s I IAwwp I s �R WE 8 A Smmlom OF 6073 is AND 99 A90 TM [ASV 9/2 of d ®43 5 AND 8 OF M PA00T4 MATE 3JUBUNRON - - -- - =- : � - - - -- "- - - - - -- °x ' - - -- GPA L PAGE 59)- L .I DER. 1 Lii'L- a ILxldr OF aaoc NO I --------- - - - - -� - -- I 12 my. ff ---- HATCH MHC- ____________________X _ _ /LOT12 I'A AP - T.v x ADY. S N 0 Y O.ID RE PUi ff 9EOD mm TFRAA/E m iAn / LOT I3 t v SE9.31'43? ivn 111.2214 1108 �xa ff 13 ff�mu n > • PAIL TREE 1 METAL LID . 3 OAK TREE 9a r= a sre - AUSTRALIAN PINE TREE A Smmlom OF 6073 is AND 99 A90 TM [ASV 9/2 of d ®43 5 AND 8 OF M PA00T4 MATE 3JUBUNRON - - -- - =- : � - - - -- "- - - - - -- °x ' - - -- GPA L PAGE 59)- L .I DER. 1 Lii'L- a ILxldr OF aaoc NO ...� YA9M7 FASCIA ® InTd 59 Ar�A:,D I I 1RAT STORY C.R.S. i- o' I. I' �I. ® ♦nII 10 IS gl 18 gi. 1® Hill F SEDF ff k 9 ®�fiW EAT THE PmYff LOINS 4D6 } ff THE P,YKLfT. ESTATE 54ffiABD/ -1'- SECTION 15, TWP. 29 S., RNG. 15 E., PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA -- I --------- - - - - -� - -- I ss x � nc meta SLOT! O'1.. . 19 ?y s '4 . P fit• .. I'A AP - N89'431 $ 192 190 N 0 Y O.ID RE PUi ff 9EOD mm TFRAA/E m .. IELIRDE 2 d� Y:�� _ Y�o - - - Y�4 WILT QE SE con ff A %NDRtm � OF LOTS 16. AID IT AND THE �� . LD - ROAD SIGN FAST 1/2O LUZ 5 AM 5 ®- METER POLE � TOP OF BANK > • PAIL TREE 1 OF TWPAOTT ESTATE SI®OSIGN ®- DRAINAGE MANHOLE OAK TREE I: �_- a sre - AUSTRALIAN PINE TREE RD - I. : -_ _-_____- ___- A111:6 WL.Lf1iWY: J'll{CGI RINFQ`MY Tom vam (AWIALO. - 'CLEAN CLEAN mD - YIYOSA TREE M - FIRER OPTIC WARNING POST a'o - MAGNOLIA TREE 'Cr - LIRE HYOUN7 se - CEDAR TREE o - LID a'0 - EVERGREEN TREE SFr. - BACK FLOW PREVENTER ® - MONITORING WELL © - CABLE WARNING SIGN -D- - U.G. DRAINAGE LINE I I ,A9N.n I �ff ' �9N- I e � A•sn SE COW OF A SIHIf601 I_ 111*311 AND 17 4* TEE. - T(2'LM5NO6. - EAST ff ff THE PADGETT MATE 9®1601 �O ( ...� YA9M7 FASCIA ® InTd 59 Ar�A:,D I I 1RAT STORY C.R.S. i- o' I. I' �I. ® ♦nII 10 IS gl 18 gi. 1® Hill F SEDF ff k 9 ®�fiW EAT THE PmYff LOINS 4D6 } ff THE P,YKLfT. ESTATE 54ffiABD/ -1'- SECTION 15, TWP. 29 S., RNG. 15 E., PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA -- I --------- - - - - -� - -- I ss x � nc meta SLOT! DUE ILET 2'eya Af SIR -IIa Ix• m `I``\ J'o s l3 J -- I I I ill EH OE v.Yir � ®a Mo L3HO0K 's00o TERHACE (PUT Bml L PAM N) . um 13 aR l ODY: . ,L 1.15SM; 11OR ff 3m 3! O'1.. . 19 ?y s '4 . P fit• .. I'A AP - N89'431 $ 192 190 N 0 Y O.ID RE PUi ff 9EOD mm TFRAA/E m .. IELIRDE 2 d� Y:�� _ Y�o - - - Y�4 WILT QE SE con ff A %NDRtm � OF LOTS 16. AID IT AND THE �� . LD - ROAD SIGN FAST 1/2O LUZ 5 AM 5 ®- METER POLE TOP OF BANK > • PAIL TREE -1 - GUY WIRE OF TWPAOTT ESTATE SI®OSIGN ®- DRAINAGE MANHOLE OAK TREE I: �_- a sre - AUSTRALIAN PINE TREE RD - I. : -_ _-_____- ___- A111:6 WL.Lf1iWY: J'll{CGI RINFQ`MY Tom vam (AWIALO. LEGAL DESCRIP 111Y A POR71OU OF LOTS 7 THROUGH 10 AND LOTS 13 1HI000H 18, F.A. KENNEDYS FAR LANE ADDITION. AS RECORDED IN PUT BOOK 11, PAGE 6, OF THE PUBIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA TOGETHER WITH: A PORTION OF LOTS I TROTH 10, A SUBDIVISION OF BLOTS 16 AND 17 AND THE EAST 1/2 OF LOTS 5 AND 6 OF THE PADGETT ESTATE 9ABVISIO, AS RECORDED IN PUT BOO( S. PAGE 59, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY FLORIDA TOGETHER *Tit A PORTION OF LOTS 6 AND 9, F.A IOHEDYS FAR LANE ADEFOCK AS RECORID IN PUT BOOK 11, PAGE 16, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA. BEING WORE PARTICULARLY O3OiIHD AS MM- CM104MG AT 1HE NORTH 1/4 COMER OF SAD SECTION 15; TH9KX RUN SIB18'56'E AllkD THE NORTH BOUNDARY OF SAID SECTION 15, A DISTANCE OF 1.09165 FEET; THENCE RUN SOOIS'ST71; A DISTANT): OF 31.60 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORER OF KI11E7'S 9DIVLLOL AS RECORDED IN PUT BOO( 11. PAGE 24, OF THE R)UC EMS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA; THENCE RUIN SNW28'E A DISTANCE O 4000 FEET. TO THE NORTHWEST COMER OF F.A. KENNEDYS FAR LANE ADDITION. AS RECORDED N PUT BOOK 11, PACE 116. OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA, THENCE RUN SOOIS'261, A DISTANCE OF 310.10 FEET TO THE POINT OF BET7HlKA THENCE RUN SW&14 -E ALONG THE SOUTHERLY BOUNDARY OF LOT 6, BLDG( 6, REVISED PAT O 9RODKMDOD TERRACE AS RECORDED N PAT BOOK R, PAGE 34, N THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS CUM. FLORIDA. AND ITS WESTERLY WD190K A DISTANCE OF 311.44 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT 5; THENCE RUN S ffWI9^W AIONNO THE EASTERLY BOUNDARY OF SAD BLOCK I REM PAT OF OD01(YDOD TRRACE, A DISTANCE OF 20010 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST OWNER OF LOT 10. SAD BLOCK 3. REVISED L RAT O BROOKYIDOD TERRACE; THENCE RUN N897 COIF ALONG THE SIIRERLY BOUNDARY OF SAD LOT 10, A DISTANCE O 111.00 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORER O SAID LOT IQ THENCE RUN Mro734�F HONG THE WESTERLY BOUNDARIES O LOTS 11 AND 12 SAD BLDG( 1 AEL45ED RAT OF BROOKWOOD TERRACE, A DISTANCE OF 100.00 FEET TO THE NORTEAT CORNER O LOT 13, SAID BLOCK 1 REVISED RAT O RR00KNOD TERRACE THENCE RUN 5119'31'0E ALONG THE NORTHERLY BOUNDARY O SAID LOT 11 A DISTANCE O 111.22 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST COMER OF SAD LOT 13; THENCE RUN SDOW06-E ALONG THE EASTERLY BOUNDARY OF SAD BLOCK 3. REVISED RAT O 9ROOKMAX TERRACE A DISTANCE O 70&02 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST COMER OF SAD BLOCK S REVISED. RAT OF BROOKWOOD TERRACE; THENCE RUN N89.4nrV ALONG Of SOUTHERLY BOUNDARY OF SAD BLOCK Z REV® PUT OF BROCIMOO 1ERRNF. A DISTANCE OF 111.63 FEET TO A PONT ON THE E45TMY BOUNDARY O A SUBDIVISION O LOTS 16 AND 17 AND RE EAST 1/2 O LETS 5 AND 6 OF THE PADGETT ESTATE SUBDIVISION, AS RECODED N PAT BOOK 5, PAGE 5% OF THE PUBIC RECORDS OF RMEILIS COUNTY, FLORIDA. THENCE RUN SDDS'49V. A DISTANCE O 1000 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID A SUBDIVISION OF LOTS 116 AND 17 AND THE FAST 1/2 O LOTS 5 AND 6 OF THE PADGETT ESTATE SUBDIVISION; THENCE RUN iffff4398'1E A DISTANCE O 19209 FEET TO A PONT THAT LIES 10 FEET EAST OF THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAD A SUBDIVI911 OF LOTS 116 AND 17 AND THE EAST 1/2 O LOTS 5 ARID 6 O 111E PADGETT ESTATE SUwm R THENCE RUN NOO15'25- AM A LIE 10 FEET EAST AND PARALFL TO THE WESTERLY BOUNDARY OF SAD A SROPiNIN O LOTS 16 AND 17 AND THE EAST 1/2 O LOTS 5 AND 6 O THE PADGETT ESTATE SUBIW90N, A DISTANCE O 49250• TO A PONT ON THE. SOUTHERLY BOUNDARY O LOT 8 OF SAD FA. I@IEDYS FAN LANE ADDITION THAT LAS 10 FEET EAST O THE SOUTHWEST CODER OF SAID LOT Q THENCE RUN N8919.4CrW, ALONG THE SOUTHERLY BOUNDARY OF SAD LOT S, FOR A 1STANCE O 10.00 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST COMER OF SAID LOT 8; TENCH RUN NOD15'26'E. ALONG THE WEST BOUNDARY O SAID LOT 8. A DISTANCE O 27.61 FEET TO THE PONT O BEGINNING, SHEET i OF 2 COUTMNG 1456135 SQUARE FEET OR 133 ACRES, WORE OR !!§ FLOOD ZONE THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY APPEARS TO BE IN ZONE X N ACCORDANCE NTH THE FIN YAP OF THE CITY OF QEARWATEII COMENIY PANEL 125096, MAP NUMBER 12103C- 0108 -H, MAP REVISED WAY 17, 215 PREPARED FOR 0 20 40 60 GRAPHIC SCALE LU h -20 x WWY ABBREVIATIONS Ri9MT- �4s�`ll n4 ��.eesromm4a orm � -� use,- xsA.mee �oeD m- A4 nxx u • �Rewo�i 'I'I Tee . � _ m.m�alitcD Sieemr¢ �is:�mscmi K: �>�s��� i•allmN �. rw m,elD UW st. 1.[m sue u. ma sR x4•x*wA Ut�xN as SLOT - vrmem a4 ax 'v - m41ue WAA- tafa1Q"`ce _Nmm s nA,eaOAta oR �� e0p •VIVA sec awuW e - � :aom � ¢¢ � 41. V �TlIYB1, milli � L16 �-.ellemAle mrr •�rAmee mmx - eN vef Alm sm omm is ®ma rt.na 4411 'm �:rmauA .. mesa m¢ m:m`°°et �.romir awswwluE �: m'w lit: LOA � ® - weuDlT elTmc nAAaR ASSITEM DIS W7 ADD BE mf TEXATED 6 IEMIRM r GTR MADLY W=M VD/OR ACCEPTED QKWAIIDG ARE AM MM 3R NO 94611E HOMO/ GENERAL NOTES I: !NESS 073RWS STATER THE ?RffFRTY MAIM SWN HII I'/AS iND.QD EN THE CANT, OR C EM D9191ATED AGENT. L UNDERGROUND AROYEMEM NOl01G 31T NOT Wien TO SUNK FDADATIONSS NAVE 40T 00 LOCATED D(OFT AS 9DN am 1 MCESSIRF ABOVE MM APROElIX6 (EG KUM OWNAI= TIM WHIN YMED A" LTG), RASE NOT SEEN LOCATED DICPT AS SIM MEAL A iNESS 01 ERMiE STATED, 116 SIN," WS PREPARED WM1IWT THE iE7EFiT ff 4 TIRE SHARON AND WY 3 SUBJECT TO AMMUL EASE E]li; RIGHT-4-NAM AND OTHER NATIFI6 OF REMR 5 TIDE AM ID VIBE ENODWtOaS DMIT AS 9DN TERM t SET-AIH OF THE PDSSHITY OF WOM7OR T THE WAtENTATIW FROM ITS MGIMA. PIAMENT HY POW45 ORER SIAM IF 9.RVEIDA IT 5 RECMWE DED THAT PRIOR TO ANY NEW ANPRVODRS d THE gMRT' LIE POSITION 6 THE NORAENTAHW SE WEER .�7,,AIE E161E® ST- 6 ANY POSITIONS THOW VII:IIOI FLORIDA C!L tRB WIIWT 7H SONG SIMEYDti METIER mN3NT. WAIINGS ARE N WE ERC TO ROmA STATE PLAE mLRDIO,TE DD NOOK EST ZOE, MON 4 QEAf.1' R dkfW jF3O6�1 (1111110 RF/AIhTIENQ, AS ESTIHHm IT LIE UMM 4flgm SENT. l,yi NIN�EAU tOrAM .ND OTHER SITE W9A7dT UXATKMS SIM 1E]EW AE 90UNDARTY LINES, AM -�` " ,• ?yck P. 'mMR ZONE LINES ANY) N I�E3OI HAVE BEEN TAM FROM THE ` ;,(�•,; �MAP TE TE TRUE 1Dm ZOE LIES. BE DDERUED BY AN ENISEE4. .AT''71.� 16�4RVEY :OI'JpL7 RND6iAA 6 OTER HATLESS T IEmD DINT AE NOT SI N Ana LOAMFEIE9 AW BA9D DI U7111Y 001FA710I rliO,DFD 117 lE066IFD5 RIG I OF DEW SKEET, AID nE EAST 908- F -447 ff EM LAW . . N.A; AONO71Y70 FA'¢(� 9H111L9d G _ ♦� .� -.'k. �,,,� il.. DEYA 14�E91 AI$Bl3D ON 7Hiau110W1 O.I<411C 994EY5 SEMYNIX 7lEFII l' AT Wql TIE 1 q I!l Di�Ail1� AS A1G7 FF2l: NAYJiffi LEGEND ® - VMZCN MANHOLE . -POWER ?CLE -- - -- - OVERHEAD WIRES # - LIGHT POLE LD - ROAD SIGN T R E E S ®- METER POLE TOP OF BANK > • PAIL TREE -1 - GUY WIRE av -WILLOW FEE ®- DRAINAGE MANHOLE OAK TREE X - WATER VALVE >� CAMPHOR TREE CN GATE VALVE sre - AUSTRALIAN PINE TREE RD slo - PINE 'WEE ® WATER W 4E1FR en - PUNK TREE - 'CLEAN CLEAN mD - YIYOSA TREE M - FIRER OPTIC WARNING POST a'o - MAGNOLIA TREE 'Cr - LIRE HYOUN7 se - CEDAR TREE o - LID a'0 - EVERGREEN TREE SFr. - BACK FLOW PREVENTER ® - MONITORING WELL © - CABLE WARNING SIGN -D- - U.G. DRAINAGE LINE WWY ABBREVIATIONS Ri9MT- �4s�`ll n4 ��.eesromm4a orm � -� use,- xsA.mee �oeD m- A4 nxx u • �Rewo�i 'I'I Tee . � _ m.m�alitcD Sieemr¢ �is:�mscmi K: �>�s��� i•allmN �. rw m,elD UW st. 1.[m sue u. ma sR x4•x*wA Ut�xN as SLOT - vrmem a4 ax 'v - m41ue WAA- tafa1Q"`ce _Nmm s nA,eaOAta oR �� e0p •VIVA sec awuW e - � :aom � ¢¢ � 41. V �TlIYB1, milli � L16 �-.ellemAle mrr •�rAmee mmx - eN vef Alm sm omm is ®ma rt.na 4411 'm �:rmauA .. mesa m¢ m:m`°°et �.romir awswwluE �: m'w lit: LOA � ® - weuDlT elTmc nAAaR ASSITEM DIS W7 ADD BE mf TEXATED 6 IEMIRM r GTR MADLY W=M VD/OR ACCEPTED QKWAIIDG ARE AM MM 3R NO 94611E HOMO/ GENERAL NOTES I: !NESS 073RWS STATER THE ?RffFRTY MAIM SWN HII I'/AS iND.QD EN THE CANT, OR C EM D9191ATED AGENT. L UNDERGROUND AROYEMEM NOl01G 31T NOT Wien TO SUNK FDADATIONSS NAVE 40T 00 LOCATED D(OFT AS 9DN am 1 MCESSIRF ABOVE MM APROElIX6 (EG KUM OWNAI= TIM WHIN YMED A" LTG), RASE NOT SEEN LOCATED DICPT AS SIM MEAL A iNESS 01 ERMiE STATED, 116 SIN," WS PREPARED WM1IWT THE iE7EFiT ff 4 TIRE SHARON AND WY 3 SUBJECT TO AMMUL EASE E]li; RIGHT-4-NAM AND OTHER NATIFI6 OF REMR 5 TIDE AM ID VIBE ENODWtOaS DMIT AS 9DN TERM t SET-AIH OF THE PDSSHITY OF WOM7OR T THE WAtENTATIW FROM ITS MGIMA. PIAMENT HY POW45 ORER SIAM IF 9.RVEIDA IT 5 RECMWE DED THAT PRIOR TO ANY NEW ANPRVODRS d THE gMRT' LIE POSITION 6 THE NORAENTAHW SE WEER .�7,,AIE E161E® ST- 6 ANY POSITIONS THOW VII:IIOI FLORIDA C!L tRB WIIWT 7H SONG SIMEYDti METIER mN3NT. WAIINGS ARE N WE ERC TO ROmA STATE PLAE mLRDIO,TE DD NOOK EST ZOE, MON 4 QEAf.1' R dkfW jF3O6�1 (1111110 RF/AIhTIENQ, AS ESTIHHm IT LIE UMM 4flgm SENT. l,yi NIN�EAU tOrAM .ND OTHER SITE W9A7dT UXATKMS SIM 1E]EW AE 90UNDARTY LINES, AM -�` " ,• ?yck P. 'mMR ZONE LINES ANY) N I�E3OI HAVE BEEN TAM FROM THE ` ;,(�•,; �MAP TE TE TRUE 1Dm ZOE LIES. BE DDERUED BY AN ENISEE4. .AT''71.� 16�4RVEY :OI'JpL7 RND6iAA 6 OTER HATLESS T IEmD DINT AE NOT SI N Ana LOAMFEIE9 AW BA9D DI U7111Y 001FA710I rliO,DFD 117 lE066IFD5 RIG I OF DEW SKEET, AID nE EAST 908- F -447 ff EM LAW . . N.A; AONO71Y70 FA'¢(� 9H111L9d G _ ♦� .� -.'k. �,,,� il.. DEYA 14�E91 AI$Bl3D ON 7Hiau110W1 O.I<411C 994EY5 SEMYNIX 7lEFII l' AT Wql TIE 1 q I!l Di�Ail1� AS A1G7 FF2l: NAYJiffi + fEY4D =F ;`!: CRII1GAt7Dt F�[� TT@@$$SS��5i Y!i ^' 11NT0E 9AAfl'9*NSINYNIM1MM YEEO L I N E D A T A Y a STNDWDS F1A LAD 9NE1MC D9eSED M 0E RA "°Tm f_ l�DNDWD UNE LIBEL BEAR DISTANCE OR PARI6 OTTER 'LYN7R,�.N4ED. DI TIEi 9PA.Y ll7 '.vAm uD aa* ASI9aT nei Li 500D5'48^N 10.00811 R® SDHAA ff WWI® '4' - L2 N8919.531Y 10.00811 LSE NOOT5'24'E 27.61'Y GEMCEA •�r'RD»hN%L ..,DIEWA 4I/A5 RASES IRTO _ DREW SIRE T �Y s SECTION 15, TWP. 29 S., RNG. 15 E., PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA P.O.C. 58918'56` t097.85'MC aorta= rrToix'vusvir s (A4+IALl - -- -- -- — '- -- - -- -'- �_! kr. ONO OF ' A ID.0 T FM LAW AEg11N . M[ 3FAEV sAFEETS SKmneCRK�, 589V5'28 -E !0.001 yt . of i 2 nl LANE AMMON I , I I a9 0 20 40 60 Ems,I x nCa x i i GRAPHIC SCALE Wa ".. I P t. PAZ 1 I L—h 20 R 3 :9p t x — ..r— ...— ..— .. —.. —_ —.. ..— .. —..— — . —. —.. —.. uawn �I 9� L E G E N D LOT 6. x ff`HO NATO + v I EN t/Y BfPI I ®- `/ERIZCN MANHOLE POWER POLE 1 I. S. MIT OF � I ---- - OVERHEAD WARE NBR- ,M4- W '(SE) 31T.K1k 310'RC' .+r l LOCK 2 C - LIGHT POE 12 i ® �' do �* ltn %z ape a� I� T R E E S p _ METER �PGN aE CRATE Ku W LOT 'a XF ae - PALL TREE • --•rte• - TOP OF BANK GUY WIRE OAK ®- DRAINAGE MANHOLE x } I D4 - WATER V ALV E OF e CAMPHOR TREE _ GATE VALVE hUiA PINE TREE BOLLARD '� PINE TREE yI PUNK 1E 40 WOT A I mA �U 8Ri I'Y i -- +• m• - 'H� � � T I I '¢c-� S_ _ x X - kNoA +Cr --nNa•- IQ art. I ao - MIMOSA TREE 0 - ER INC POST OF MAGNOLIA TREE Y1 - FlRHYORANTk I IDf GRATE EVERGREEN FII tREE SWAZI. 3N WE aFy. BACK FLOW PREVENTE7t GO CABLE WARNING 711. __O__ - U.C' DRAINAGE UNE • Ay DO I SURVEY ABBREVIATIONS PLAT 90Y: a4x _ . -. .. , i g �'I� I ..R ,w- •am qc ry -� "r �IS • e, 98 uR'wr•mO°a m: marur n''� u.•mer"0 I �(I� yp�,�. j a!p en �^ 'r L. �.+sx� iii cF•oxa mm,[ ru�o -'uurt� •rrw LI$ aB6•:eex wn ocnm� w-� . : nom n mu m, aona (', � I (ArAaO •_.. .. —..ay. m -rAAS _ I�rr�nr vnans� ra x * � uI u>m ri r°azr. �mm uAr srrr• yi xs`' CRATE 1W � o''►° - +s'P OOITf. —..— —,�,t +'� m -. m��[�em mc,ue , � 4rnx 'mni: marz mn 44 y Y 4 YV:' a - O 'r• a rymlf - W mrt � a Mt � � °vi '�v nrmays, �� a �rmA� wv.�mw ire rwnnAw� a -m�,ae (RAT 200( 12 PACE iA) ` i-T.. ..i .— ..— ..— ..— .. —.. —.. �. L3 q m mrlwry 2uam��a — .waerio�A •�r�'®' w• I fSMSED PLAT OF I S ® BROOKYOOD TEHRAC[ � (ITERRACE (Pa 6 PACE 34) I' we marz m .•u w - I: O q (PLAT STICK 2W PAGE OA) rb u®w 2 5i .. —.. nok n n:ru ui m ra- �v,rvm.amur `s _.'®mane ma c� �'4 yf: ae f. x e Grp "Fr. xb t`' w -rm n -Amm 4 4 RERTIl10N POND ne -r10•A wa m•. ne. �6aw¢ymn4 N. mroa TIb Mr WI • 6DOa AvAAEm p i j TE Y (A-" r TOE s %W d .. � N6E`OWS MY &W 8E CONCATENATED AS REQUIRE. u• x � n 08tA O]YCLY IEfLO® NO ACEPhD II8ENA7106 ME ANN JIIIDD 917 NOT ffECFID IflEM 90 I 29 (SAL NOTES F' J OI�JIFa �HiR SBAICIAE d• I 1. CEE6 OTIEIEH STAhD, THE F1104NIY OE90fPDC1 910AI1 fElEC1 WAS r'NOALLD SY THE CE71[ N ODIR sE mem BE901A1m AIDff. s !OT KTI I 2 U@FOAID NR; MIDI NCIOIG 9R MOT WIED ro 9EING FMNAATIOM HAVE 40T BEEN TED weT� YID MNEnE I I' ------ -- as • �' X =WT 4 SHOW HOE IN. Y I. .r gg '� sC �' v yW d + of +ky - J4 a MCCE�¢ ASK GROM AEATOW2flN5 (Er a llNC CAITHA NR TN7.BE WITH SESM MEAT, ERL HAW m IF wr 10 • r' O auk CRAW , O IV BEEN MIS) DwrT a 910.1 mom �.. _ t. WES OOEDWS: STATED, 116 W*"f WAS PIEPA ED WN01T THE SDEFIT CF A M STANCH " MAY BE ONE SRWY ERICi 91d➢BiG' i iUT�ff,34'W I11.W1: I70'R :91 CAS . � � S iHF1E'A MO Nsc 910mwEENTZ ME" wo IEIECI MATTERS 6 a17/dl u' W t0 - E BECAUSE ff THE P®Itt C" MMERT ff TIE =01ENTATION MCC 115 CdCIK NACIETR 8T MEW a� I N PTSWCN 6 THE WAAEIRrc IS BE Nem TO ANY IEW MPnOW1ELrs CI DE FN6Emr x 81( z GI ANY NA006 THI E6 30 . OF PRMED WTN9rt Wa TDI CONSENT .'Qa .mONx ..— .._._�tn_{t _ -- x @ 99 Ix�n �� A�4 =i Y�ARE WAR THE A9 STATER 6n6 Omi __ 4" 1FAIN6 N 1iFFTElItf ro RDim STATE ftNE dN9mxA NCRFDI REST z1Ne FRhME V ! x� I ,A9r� A 9. ALL OI�ff MNAOD8UIrAlKIIRS NCR 110 979E iNmW1oN 1DGn01S WON HIM ARE d 5 - / IO:NLLwlff ®IOARY UES IAAES OOEDIH STATED. - j J g �i u K Kmcr tw�HF 9ATE NETJ q 8 ^� /� IEFF7EIIQD WP'NO TE TU MZONE EilFS NBEGIN aST BE WXTERWIE•EDD BY NOOUR Ir I + t4.t4 �O7•Hb69txA�oa. ax W A� Y 11. nts 51.Rk7 oafs M07'BEJFIEWE I. •AM1. aj. MOUTH f6T1#CTOIi EA9IENR N OTHER MATTERS s FECM NAT ARE N07 4qN _ - I I I , 1J� -. ' "i 9O ARE l 9i N1E01 SKEET, rY OE 1101 PLIJAWFD BY6 CMST95 MG SMMWSON .11 IIOR fw1F/ ro9F4N ftEDl AfE.3l4D THE IAIgAL CHIC 9MEY5 BENOYVa( tJEFII 11 AT Wql THE gq3id e➢ 0 '0 -0' i `� `� L ° 'A4 *. * X X, x ,xy , ED AS,uM7 TEST Mvna BOII�DARY SURVEY ' iEVeTE`ANFD TBE00VRC NPOEADN ON iTIM 12 / (mOTWM72A- . iW41T WEST adAOARTi7R -a- EASEMENT a uhT/a1TI/ (mm 20i) I.l�r,.iD iFE n uC.31iF JOB NUMBER: 070172 GATE SURV£YFD: 07 9 7 - -- - -_ - -- I_-- - -- - -- .. _ --- - - - -T ---------- -- -- ®- ` dTR. ----- ------- -__ - -- -- _ --- t9OY ff - - -_I 9� I I DAr"E SAWY sWN' AEEE1 DRAWING FlIE 070172 DATE DRAWN: 08 - -T o _ r<P_ i - y4 •.'Q�: �ii. L(. '- ------ - - - - -- - - EDT T2 �AT�N ,���F ----- ---- ------------------ - - - - -. - - - - - -- - - -i --------- - - - - -h - � - - - -- sn/oFgr%Fa Lro vNWnc oE9olan STATE nn2 LAST REVHOk 12 3 7 K RER:1tENfE: N A2 U•7 -SAC r $IIEAIOFi�:l6 CAIf1C111C1 9W1. Iqf EONI� F62ID5 W 1 I I - s PAEIfSODkR Dv+K PKOE M sANEYtNO Hur ff Ee tea• AGMai nE' vNAE1m°°mr GEORGE A. SEW H JAM A ..r am,.ks T.�w•m. ,.a„a„a .MWVdl CC 7A/MAPnNA7Tn SHEET 2 OF 2 d�1i, f l� VIAR 1AHTY DEED•— Pg1te,C LL r- 1.� r 1, ,�„� Q 4302 ,,AGE 824 V»8h* ev MQ40 thta a7O • •8 %. day of Kay , A. D. 1975 , BETWEEN Paul C, Smith and Gladio 0. Smith, his xife R�tvtip0 of Ibe Coanty of Piriallaa aad $lobo o! Florida L1fll0 (Itli Wf G:hri o F1o:i®o of tlw flra4 p3yt, sad C»ftERAL TP.i,BPdQNB 0014'Ci�'f OF FFARII1Ar1d P. O. Box 110, Taupe, Florida 3S ra lix bd at the amty of Rilimborouah abd %2e of Florida Part 9 of rho owomd P"*, WrrNZBW$, that tbd said Put ias oY tho ford part„ Yoe and la roaraderptim o! the ooao of TAM sod NO /100 IJoDgNy tra thcam fa bs11d paW, tbo uoomiipt er4eecoF to tlarobp eehnawkdged, ba ve a—tm, huBwAed, cold and feaoafartod, And by t 'h= Aamub �'A . p-t, b-,Wa, -V and tmWo.r Gnt, t$o MM q=ty of *9 r ;I i 54P" 4`7t1 itn SW 4avo Yo xw. a that sartab f MVQ aY hod bWff and b*s ha tlxe Coaft P, 1ao , aad state of M-WO, >M PZIUMMY &smama an 1640M. .r&att 3, Slocft 3, Btoobwood Te=aoo Revised, tau rWrded in Plat Bean 0 tba P� PTS& Hacards 09. iTt «..tY .7:;. '? js."�'`l. ���• . {: T: lhr •1 i� r.rri �: _ • 2 •'t • {; '• rr �{ iin t' ��; a _'}.�. !1� -�?` . � }:4: �'';�I nM'•' -Y•�: i�rt '%+. iy ±•.. ••E. Diu '.F' s .y '' •�« L;{ i.:�.t '.� . }. 1 f�T`,_• t• J IP� -mot 4Y.�T.- :•Gw�.. ^Iy�pN.�S r�..�'.�.••'. :•, �j..t•'' ��",�.: ••..... . �iY .'•fir.}. • fa/YYa.4�tM•�t� nu tk �Y�ir'di. umftnu and m]1�- •^!•-•CM voth ••Qmy Pi' 'r •T•�,.-♦• � t&•' b,l,Ja"tom 'fin � falar�mt :.. {. and aWis, do.rar sadi� of dear. revrtafoa, avlwtader W1d eseemaut theroto beton6tmg or m agywieo oppou. t�ttarst.ao,i�at D a!b>@D TO B1010 as came th fee otaly%fatrrer. Ana the bta 1d3 1,99 of tdm (fiats Pace ;ovmant UM rho sold eset y of tba tsaond part Ana they i &92 r miacd of Ow cdd pr all then t&W of Yma from a➢ oacombremceo eACeat :i tsd valoreM lases for the year 1975. :.} aad' tbee `s they have Good Ti;ht nod lmalal auUwrfty-to meal the ewe, nad'tbat the amid p=t jag of the Ora part do Imteby folly F1mreN{t rho th1v to tbo cold fend, and W41 derend the mmme against the lawfo) eulma of _ •- alt gatsono wlwaseacot; ii IN tF1T1MS 4T$L> SROP, tM said parties Of the Best part ){see beagmto ad their bend 9 tad �•f' .` wade per ni}avo dttao{• � °••i vexed ' •� � ...,....._' M* Mkt XUMM ' PnMLIAS ZOMIF Of y 1 , That oa thw a� aY J ¢. may D. 1075 . m0 uom too panmdky appeased Paul C. Smith a2d Gladis Smith, his wife bQe to me &maws to bo mo pose g deat3ed is'ood 6 im mx%tW the 4oro90438 oonveFobm to GERI 4AL TELEPHONE COltl'ANY OF FLORIDA cd M0004 ea %--&dM tho —tk- *--1 b be t h-ir lmre act aad dad for rise nmm. omd papam ��Er saxoin�mod;iaatffik ,r• A.•K�1 - �Yaag L�ltilf�Qlln�OY` 1[r , t9' � IIlSd asflriml esal a!O•,•i/V iF0 i 1� � �.7 ` Fn 4Sm Cmantr a$ � mad Sete oL -t7 i✓, , °g` too¢ otarawld. Are W oar pn ar xASre , ! 191` Cormtafmtma >�I>ftES OC7 8e. 1vm A �tit� +ezluarnvsli Xvtair Poblk Thto lwtrvmvnt propmed byt awwrd R. Rutherford, Attorney at Law, P. i). box 110, T� , Fla. c 0 Vesting Deed 1 . I Order: CTPA- 200701630 Doc: 2.0111121031BPIOR.4302.8241111 Page 1 of 1 Created By: boverman Printed: 4/12/2007 9:49:35 PM EST !i f i r s , ,!n Y .'i if WARRANTY DEED —FORM li E. 1•Rw.— Fnnitl ®nl���',�.,` � O k.4392 PAGE 825 ��Tff itthent"E4., W.R. tbta 4 P41 dap of May , A. D. 1975 BECWEEN Ellis Hayes Roach and Esther F. Roach, his wife kkull %Q_. ptocri a Aa rw of rho County of Pinmllao and State of Florida Cuiv ogevir wiv= partlew of tbo itrot pest, and General Telephone Company of Plorids P. 0. Box 110 Tampa, Florida 33601 JIM Zi A fulls of tho County of Hillsborough and State of Florida plow of the tmeand port. ItiITISESM4, that tho ontd V.%ee of Ohs dttt Port, for anal in wnuidenflon of tae woae of Ten and NonOO D4.0W- to than in head PaW, the reeaipt vAwxmf L hereby ackmawk- td, have Wanted, bgrtai -dp wA and trampfeswd, cad by tbaee premnto do Wmti b4n*h4 tall and Uwd*v oeto rho mqd putty of ttao mmi wt aad itp boim m¢ mai p s fomor, eB Um eptpiip petal of Lad bUW 1@0 bed is tba of oS of Pinellas , and state of Wilda, store p.eiantarly d-odW rA fa". 1AS 49 Bloek•3, Revised Nap of Brookwged Terrace, Aceordiv's Ra the plat f9iereof taeordt4d in Plat Book 8, Page y#,Public Records of Pinellas County, Piorida yL '.Ysf�v :i: l:� d•::h - - ,• A +r.•.Tn �". Ste• t.•:. 1:� '� � {!•?A7 :_a:�._•.Vr .:: ::'Tr`I .• :.���! � :'fit S. rooLvalt with aII the tonemputai hot ditemmto aid appnttenanem wjtb every plivoere, i iatattaat Well assns. dower and t of dotter,. u"irdon scmriadcr and' easement thereto betol!Et{+a or e arm a appen• 'SO HAVE BLI1S TO $pLD rtes Dams yin taw timpk. tottxt . Red the acid parties of rho Srot pmt covenant with the 0.14 party ' of tba wean past that ,they ere Ip u4 aaiaed of rho ¢dal psmbbea that they aaa nee from alt eae braaeca except Ad Valorem twma for the year 1975 vm4 flat they have aced viabt a" tiv,fal authority to 4*11 the same: and that the old Part, LOS of tie StA pmt do hcmby faRy wu mt the titio to the sabl ] and, and P ll defend the same ogatnet Me 14w*W chbas se n8 pKnm wbeA10wm. IN vrna83 IFBWMF, the Bald past Les of the flat part here . ltmunto net tbpit hinds ood the day and ear Dhow �trlttoa. DoRvemd In Our pmaenter N j$)kalz of Flor119 . ._ --) of Pl.11na - --• 4 I AERFBY GERTWT. That on this r ?g day of May A. A a 75. vo'i baface me petu.4y nWUad Ellis H. Roach and Esther P. Roach, his ei.fe• i H to me mown to he the partoa deaerAwd in tetd uW es0eded the fur%viup; coaMwce to General Telephone Compasry of Florida d md.oeve: any aekaowkdw the excentha thereof to ba their fm act and dekd for the men and pmpoeoa r6i m N beret TMu&A".. s 1 Vie, , W17AM try ernes acA otadst tent 5u7C, 10, 4.e ate -I- 1.1 Vesting Deed I a• r NJ j4 UP inRmment prepared W. Howard R. Rutherford, P,ttomtay at taw �j�; ?,;•° P. O. Box 110 Tampa, Florida 33601 ' "'•••• Order: CTPA- 200701630 Doc: 2.0111121031BPipR.4302.82511I1 Page 1 of 1 Created By: boverenan Printed: 4/12/2007 9:49 :34 PM EST r° i. 11. ., .trnn• J; ; r iI + r a z F Y 1e. i I t r; 1-15� zol;e 4' =� TVTSIA »x ..,ere..:., . ,,..r. A ,....33« FAGF Z'$,5 AN- A lti��'1t1�1' Iftrle• dell/ ref A•:gnSt 1. /J, 1;1 76 P�IUPplt Charles :.. Smitii, and Delpha Smith, his wife, 1D12 Riverview Roadr Sterling, Illinois 61081 j; j"If lh1' ! nt+ltti/ ref Whiteside an,! .� u(r of JCllinOi& � pert ies ff //,r /lrmt e rt, rend General Tolc:p� one Company of Florida, a Florida corpora on IirJ r•nlytnr,+ / / "u r.timlln!+ nn.lr'r the /urn.+ uI' /hr .� /air' ul• Florida hurdler Ila pJ•ill'i/utl IJ.Jrr ry' I,rtmill,• ;1r Ihr r' „,,fill rrf ilillshorough eerie( 1 .Wert.• (/' Florida /,mill ,tI' Ihr arras /rri par 1, �I WitUffifift4. MW /llrxtild parl iea n/ the /t:..t putrt, for afill in r•n,xldc)- fiPlr•,n 'y' tJ..• `,"If ref TP,a And N01100 and other valuable considerations Mdlirrv, I: h' the:, fee hour/ I gr.J ehr• t'rrr;p/ rr Jrr•rr•r;P ;x hr -rhll rrrklJUh lterl_>r•,1, rpf Ve ,•.tree,,,, 1 „rrj,t;u•d, ...,Irl, aliened. r•urirr,l, rr/,•a•r,/, raj�•n / /ial, ,• „)n'rg,•d 111,1 Poll - !i:•nrrd Ltl th -ef. Jet-, nrr:l. dt, J•Jr•I;,I. /.ull :"iL, ne•ll, Woe. rrvlr;m•, reie,Ixr•r rl” r•qR t'W rNnl r•nAllrJJl Jru /n 'JrP If &/ /,trill .,j Mt, •vnrinid parl and Its Apt -r•rx- �I xrery and ax. -d4ltx ftlreet'r, rill lb-11 r•'r/,rla /rurvl ry' Jrlad llliud «JJr/ hrrtld IJr the, ('•ruuly 'if 2inellas .run �trtlr' u/' /'(•rrbla, ,lore' pnrifrrriNrl4 de•xeribed elm fitill111•s. f 40 Pac ` • d-d Lot; Five (5) of Block Three (3) Brookwood Terrace j) Subdivision. in the City of Clearwater, Flci~i.da 42 :_r ;,-, D according to the revised map or plat thereof as <31.t recorded in Plat Book 8, Page 34 of the Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida � Subject to restrictions, easements, reservations of record, if any an well as taxecr for the year 1975 and subscquont year9. 1• , ,1 I r 1t FL'OQ110A( ?� r�`v°', f�o� {bas SUR :fir _ nod 5(l1ARY,;.. stn X o,• o rF.r serene ►R �3rJ.Z01� - `tFi - Sir ITfiCti4(`t? -'• : =40 001 • .- now t10eT -' 5-- �^� ---- ter. -.�•' i o � oEn IIze, ate xdf F-e � f' E S 7 i•- w1 �t I = 1FV#d1(tc trith rr /I lht• Irlrtftern/s. Irrrrdl /,unruly an•1 u),p►rr /rnrlrr.•v, rr;llr plil•;Irtrr•, rJ_r/rt, 10f,• ;I'Ir,•r•mr rend etelrltr, el JN'rr•'It?'I rI_ % /tl rrj drat.'., 1•r•r•rtvlalt, I(rru,uirider atttfr�( f'rrtNI'Mi'll {t lite ret,r�hrl„rr;.;tJ;% ter in ugl/rri.r• upper /wlJlinle: 1 T.0 RUM U11t) `il M111 ! Ihr' .+•rJ1Jrr• M fee niJHplr /iwreer. f hell the, a,•uld parties vj lhr llisl /"Irl ,tu rnrr•nunl with +l,r' vulrl I,il•ty r,l• lhP Nr'r -unrl p,1rl 11ne1 they Irllt j'1llt fl ar'I;e4l Nl' the mild Jere Nrl.tra• /left/ that fire, I; fare o/' rill Inrvtulhrtrue•e, tried /hut they hold d,",r/ rhilrt and hrtry'rel ur,11ieprily 1,, melt the aura and that ,.,fill Purl iesuf Ilrr /Irml purl duth hrerebil /all# trarrout ti.r tNlr• Ire maid Irt1n/, an'/ Ireh' drJ'ond the miller ..satire/ the /.rueful elulnrx fir all •• hrrx+ n,r n•hr.J•r.:r•r r• r. i. E. 21 iI 11F ? itlrrr f. I /rr' -ill purl ies ref the first part /Verve h errruttrt i mrel their h-ols r,h,l ,f/s the tl'rl/ urtrl /fair tibare Jrrille'a, Migned, Scaled un.•!. Si::::eJ.•ti :n tAre I'n•,.vnrr: _ I • /t •; ,r�� 'z led` y • srI}i t]p; i ls, i�'r i,wr >•C ! yR� i e )PW •6t' 1 v ' �. CEP IT• •i 43 P>'I e�� 1• I! Order: CTPA- 200701630 Doc: 2.0111121031BPIOIL4330.24511j2 Delpha Smith J Vesting peed a M.I 7 L 4+ 1 F� rA S 4 Page 1 of 2 Created By: boverman Printed: 4/12/2007 9 :49:26 PM EST 1 #tall' of , 1 Y Illinois ' Z. L'4330 PAR 246 , !� (20" Of Whiteside. ? 1 Vttthg ccrrvrg Veil un We 21st rluy r,f August 1(r 75, Gr fare err penionolly upprared Charlos N. Smith and pelpha ' Smith, his wife. to rrre knnu•n h) by the prrxons rlrxeribed In atnf rrlru .r,rrrrtrr'r! the %rr;,fr. lug rnrrrryanre to General Telephone Company of Florida, a Florida corporation, (ind . mertrll(1 rrr•6wr,n•lndlrvd If the crceulion tlrrrro[ In lie their jrer art and deed for flee rrxrx nn;i.• /err% /rs!xr:r 11:vr�fll�� »tcat(ortrr(• ' • tlrr , tttR'1M uty x 1�1111ahtrr aur( uJ(Irfrrt ,ru( a0 Stezlinr, I g��' +,: I� fn Ile+' !•aunty :rf Whiteside rr„J , \rRfr• of l!lflr(rt+/ yrnr lull rt/ •r arl,l. (; .fly Cotrrr,rissiun Isrlares? ? -z ?N, fl.. A °nfrrry l'rchlin , x, i Y h f Y N r r r a p a >r W m, a� o � V � r7 2 .x 7� tr: Ak Order: CTPA- 200701630 Doe: 2.0111121031BP1OR4330.2451112 I 1 1 I Ll G W' Page 2 of 2 A 8 n G 0 �i 1 t; to ?i J Created By: boyerman Printed: 4/12/2007 9:49:28 PM EST Created By: boyerman Printed: 4/12/2007 9:49:28 PM EST F op eninsular Telephone Comapny Vesting Deed mw1409 vw499 I TUT WARRA'Iffy DMD i-15 INLE7.7M Made this 5th day of January, A. D. 1953, :::•green ::. :!�ILLUS and HA ME M. ?HILLIF3, his Ore. of the State or Florida, parties o!' the first parts T: 'LE-;HON-K ",0'1eA.oY, a co:poration organized art! 1 ia;er the laws of t*-.e State of Florlda, with its o:Tl2e ,:I•-, .-lace of business at Tanpa, In the ; -runty of -*—,,*-o'. o" '-'lorlda, w*r'.o!:t, p:.-st o!'flce address Is ?. . in rida, party of the secor•. pert, .. - -* .: AS FAL,',S: I i.,iL tit• said parties ,3: tl.— N r:-.t . 'rt — - :, -:'.. In -),' t*ie --=. of 110.00, and other roo-1 -!- -1 *C.' *.hec I:-. :.,s:A paid by the s•ild party �-- :-.- : -::-*-, 1.7 ifereb.r ar.-k:.-,v'*- d an•! to sa•: r.•I•t.y ')., t-ft ::- ! i.,rt' --.: ali: --ert-sln r•!,il 1) and i.1 -ht (3), a -s. ( S'!) :: :! the allf; ':r, :'OT'n lve (•-)) ur,(; ly. ((j), of R7,1ordin to the :)r thereof -d J ,, .-Le (b), •u:-u . L.v'ry-r,1t,P (59), pu'a1-- is m•j::e by U.0 Slet UCr,*ejA1:d 1,r Lhr- tt.e con(.1tion th• it. ti.ti •-)ovo deser•10•1 !"-Y --!,J oj the grai.Ler- for thr- lo,,- at !on o!' Its office In the ',Ity o:' 'Ic-arr.rater, !•'!or1':FI, and in,..rov,-::�ents t'-.)r :.r:)i;r-rty so uv-(i -althlri (3) j--ar:; :'vin, the P-.- the grantt•e shall riot. cell nor djsjj,)!:#- or •il-thin sfil,i three-y-:ar ,ertod except in cf,r- .L-. Lhn L81-s Lr.J CSP03it!0% 0:- all Of itr L•ele- r. :)r,,)nrt:r ani: factlitir-z It. the r:lty of ';In- r- n :. r) L' r 1:* sold, shall be sunj,rct L , Lha.tibove COV•rn!I..t. 11:: to c)•:c•-j,)ation. In 0,e event th-it grariteets n•••m I!, not nstablis'ned upon chid premis• -s within P! ^rlod of throe (3) y:ars, 1,1i,i ;;rantor3 may at any L!Mr.- -.7't*-,I.,i slxcy (0.')) days a!'t,:r the •--Yairatlon of said period L!, re,-jr-abase said promist❑ •At and for the sum of Dollars (t20,000.00) and in the event of' such ln-c , �Ion, by grantors, within said period, the grantee shall •f!-::nvay :::tie'- premises by warranty deed, free and clear of all lien; and nnqumbrances upon payment or Bald sun or money. Antos maw And said parties of the first part do hereby 8 the title to said land, and will-defend the same ahains` claims of all persons whomsoever, except: Taxes and assessments levied subsequent to recem!)ei Iii ifIl'iie55 iii:EREOF, the said parties of the fi have hereunto signed their names and affixed their sealt and year first above written. r 51,ned, :;waled and nelivered� t in the ?resence W. If. l'iULCIPS 6 TF Y. ST '.Ti: OF :'LORI' A :Ua Y F' P1:.'1A, AC I ;1':iCEf3Y 'EnIFY that on this 5th day of .7r.trn 1953, before me, the undersigned authority, i,er:;anally ti fir ?iiILI.I:•5 anti IIA ?T1:: '!. ::'ILLI:'S, iris -rife, is :c,Nr. t• ti:.t pers:)nr. de::�ribed in and whi crecuted the fort: r -An.:: aeverilly acitr,c,rrledged the execution thercof to he ti:trir And deed for the uses arid. pur)oses therein ^i••ntioned. A fi ntii=. :! eii;Li.:n, ti:e wire o. * the said •,, F. :':iILLIPS, ^xaniantion takr -n and msde. separately anti a,art i'rom ^_r av�barel, ;'urtiv:r ac,::,orrledged that she r..nde herself a p•j. s•ii•i Irtstrumont for the purpose of renout:cin' anri rc•1irrl d,)K(.r and ri. -4ts of donor and conveying; her caparate e. ^,tr to tht• Linds, Lenemonts ana hereditaments th °rei:. descril, thereby .-ranted anti released, and that sire executed said !'realy and voluntarily, and without any •:o-nptilsion, ccr.=+ apprehension or roar o:' or from her said husband, .:IT':XE S -ny hand and official seal the date _sa!' )i Notary. uoollic State or FOrldF lay commission expires: .r 1k nw •.u�.t _ in us tat w.l srsa. noun dart', ow u& � Qi.t .ClewiI Caare. i Clee�. ' WARRANTY DEL+D --FORM R. E. I.R•r.— Franklin Prin•mg Co ,Tu ips Yin�ii�vS &Si„+�'33t�iiF�12,`'+'1{•tL 2t�Su i7V. 7a.. g+.•i r.,�.. v . .. _• .. , _ t,.t �..'y.. Miff ate' y �S7i1S a }Y& Sl fil'.1S -7.S1' sisSAAU?V- • IS7,1k:.:1 -_'. 1y ;V q4ry Ui�yiR}lFtr vnPlFa inbenture�, Wide �$U9% S day- of Aprf1 A. P. Idly . '• 13F,TtWF.1• -1`i John F. NoulLon and Edith h. Houltou,his wife 1 O ' e � of t4 � /4,Y`�fr° F.4287 P�sE 8 county of Pinellas NO S'lte of Flar('a pasi leg; of the Ant put, and General TelWhone Compagy pf Pio -ida Post Office Box 110 Tampa, Florida 33601 Of the County of Hillsborough and State of Florida party of the second part. WITNESSE'1•H, that the said pastes of the 11"I put., for and in considetotion of the some of Ten and no 100a Dollars, ' to them in harm pajd, the reeewt whereot is horcby glinowic.lgad. ha ve granted, bargained, sold and imafetnd, and by these presents do grant, bargola, salt and transfer unto the eaid part y of the second pact and its htdts and aaaigna-forever, all that ectwit parcel of land lying and bein4 !n the Couotp +�I of Pinellas , and State of Florida, mare partict•larly described as follows: i ti �s Lots 1 and 2 in Mock 3 of Brookwnod Terrace $ubdivision , according to Revised Map or Plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 8, page 34 of the public records of Pinellas County, Florida, i OGETHEA with all the ten, ments. hereditan+enla are appurtenvrcra, with every privth•:oe, tight, title interest and estate, dower and right of dower, tercraion. nmu!adtr nail mn ament thoreto balongmif or in ani;& apper• tainingt TO HAVE AND Iff) IIOLD the same in rou s+mpla for,.ter. And Cho Bald part ter of the flat part do euvenent with tho sutd part Y of The Recond part that they arelawfully solved of the said premises that they are fro* from all encumbrances except advalorem taxes for the year 1915 r a7:r6 and that i 'hey have good tight and lawtul authority to sell the same; and the, the said prrtios of the Emt Part 7 r hereby fully warrant the title to the said Lvrd, +ml will urfand the Fame against this iawfai cwq a of ( per..ons whorrzoevor. IN WITR•FSS WHEREOF• the said part fasof the a: >t part have 4munto act their lands and o ul a the day and year shore written. a 07 -end, Settled ata-De1j,"'JU iin.O-ur[ Presence- ~ (SEAL) e/1 C. �¢.ti _ (SEAL) I la c H q �'" ;Orin[ of P'1_neilas a ra o 1 HEREBY CERTIFY. That os this s ^ lay of Aril A D. 1!375 , efotr me personally apptarsd John R, Moulton and Edith L. Houlton, his wife t to m: known to be the prraon a dotard ed fn aed +bo executed the futrgaing conveynnea to General Telephone Company of Florida j� aad sevcslhr aelaowlcdae nra osacurion thereof to be their free uut and dctn for the us" and poryoseo Haute mt- Uonsd)asjjbegR*k igrL @ � w.r.lenatmm and ofatdal seal I cams last afe y of ? �Lc•' _ . mC State of '�.rr� ti �m . +.._ . the )lij utrYrarr Ur Canmaidoa Ewmst_sss r S_f1iE_sf ROHOR M_ lh f `vim.. •� _ f a. -i . _ _ . i_ 1 fi l� Thi• in:trsment prepared brz n amrara r.. rucnerigro, At 610 !Wigan Street Tampa, Vesting Deed a J ';der: CTPA- 200701630 Doc: 2.0111121031BPIOR4287.82511 12 Page 1 of 2 Created $y: bovermanl Printed: 4/4/ 007 8:43:15 PM EST 4 r i i t a J ';der: CTPA- 200701630 Doc: 2.0111121031BPIOR4287.82511 12 Page 1 of 2 Created $y: bovermanl Printed: 4/4/ 007 8:43:15 PM EST o syr* ! W"...MNTY DRED —PORN R. FI, I'Rov.,— FranBlln Painting Co. Tamps . i i ;F =n .r Vesting Deed 9414 bbletuture, Died. this 26th._ _ _ -.. - — day of duly D. is 75 , ub'TWEEN George W, Pierce and Victoria M. Pierce, his wife �' 43A PAM �32 of the County of Pinellas and State of Florida Wise of tho first put, and General Telephone Company of Florida P. 0. Box 110. Tampa, Florida 33601 of the County of . tiillaborough and. State or Florida Peru of the ooeond part, WITNESSETH, that the anti part iea of the Bret part, for and In consideration of the turn of Tex and Iw /l0Q Dp>tayp, . to Chem In hand pall, the rocalpt whereof Is b.mby aalatowledged, ha vat granted, Immulned, sold and transferred, gad by theot pteeonta do groat, bargain, sell and itansfur unto the sold part y of the ooeond part and its helm and aetlgns forever, an thut certain parcel of Ie,at lying vnt going Ilk the County of Pinellas , and Stalo of Florido, more partloularly described ox follows: Lot 6, Block 3, Revised Nap of Brookwood Terrace, accords -3 to Use plat thareof recorded in Plat Book B, Page 34, Public Records of Piucllas County, Florida. '" '-� a�' � -`•t� �ICl'+ + q � DUGUMETIiARY• =•; „,•. DeAU8 -919 I • M LII I °'° va .:�r'� P,e. '�".1 . i� TOGETHER with oil the tenements, hemditamrnts and appuctertancez, with every prlvilr.Rn, rl ht, title Intomet and oatata, down and right of ,4mwcr, reversion, remalmlcr and ratrmmtt literal* belongmg or�n anyw{eo ayper- tafning: TO HAY£ AND TO IiOLD the some hm fee obnple forever, rLtd Via Bald purties of tits first part covenant with the Bahl party of the second part that they are lawfully acltcd of •lho Beal pmratma that they rn• free from all vocunrbrances except ad valorem taxes for tiro year 1975. and that y have good right and Iawfat authority to Bull the auto; and that Me Pahl Imn lee of the first part do homhy fully tmrrautl tits Lille to the avid land, anti will defend tan raver ttguiaet the lawful claims of all Deem. whonrmorer. IN WrIWESS WIIL•'REOV. the said port fee of flu• Aral Iatrl have hereunto not their hands and Beals the daT artd year aboty wAttan, Signed, Sealed "4 Delivered U Oar .sanest ' .. Ytyr .. _ !/.•i°t :K.�.9 j,�r (SEAL) btate oL__. FLORlo� pbc -a -.6 -2a Ply °i:i Y f N1:I l.A$ (Coulltp or__ ....... I IIEKEBY CERTIFY, That on this 28th day of July A. D. 18 75 , bofom ran parsonally appe:rod George W. Pierce and Victoria M. Pt:rco, his wife to mr huona to Ire fro pL-mn doscrlbod in and ahe rzeautoil tho foretro:ug convo)anon to Coneral Telephone Company of Florida and severally acknowledge the execution thereof to be their free act :uul doss fur the one and purposco thorela mentloned; 3ihrn *-i % WITNMS'rt5 eignntgtegUd official veal a4 A, MA in the County:0.,�.- �d�.,..�i_rtAA --r _. ... an.1 State of .,�z0/?,��/a• the day and year last nforessld.;, . r ` amisefoa E � xR.'.3:r"" � .._._.__ /i.i 4_ !Sef =!7_ SEALI my Cot tl` Notary Yublie � . Ln . �t�rx�vti .�'i�r'�:�iR�''S�:�.+i.:�r�k � ••r'Y,�rQ�xi��' instrument prupdfW -hy, Iloward K. gutheriurd. Attorney at l.av, P. fm, %ox 11Q, Tampa, Fla. r•.S{ R�(t1RId T� 33601 y t). i t •a,l P Order: CTPA- 200701630 Doc: 2.0111121031BPIOR.4316.23211I1 Page 1 of 1 Created By: boverman Printed: 4/12/2007 9:44:30 PM EST i i i i ;F =n .r Vesting Deed 9414 bbletuture, Died. this 26th._ _ _ -.. - — day of duly D. is 75 , ub'TWEEN George W, Pierce and Victoria M. Pierce, his wife �' 43A PAM �32 of the County of Pinellas and State of Florida Wise of tho first put, and General Telephone Company of Florida P. 0. Box 110. Tampa, Florida 33601 of the County of . tiillaborough and. State or Florida Peru of the ooeond part, WITNESSETH, that the anti part iea of the Bret part, for and In consideration of the turn of Tex and Iw /l0Q Dp>tayp, . to Chem In hand pall, the rocalpt whereof Is b.mby aalatowledged, ha vat granted, Immulned, sold and transferred, gad by theot pteeonta do groat, bargain, sell and itansfur unto the sold part y of the ooeond part and its helm and aetlgns forever, an thut certain parcel of Ie,at lying vnt going Ilk the County of Pinellas , and Stalo of Florido, more partloularly described ox follows: Lot 6, Block 3, Revised Nap of Brookwood Terrace, accords -3 to Use plat thareof recorded in Plat Book B, Page 34, Public Records of Piucllas County, Florida. '" '-� a�' � -`•t� �ICl'+ + q � DUGUMETIiARY• =•; „,•. DeAU8 -919 I • M LII I °'° va .:�r'� P,e. '�".1 . i� TOGETHER with oil the tenements, hemditamrnts and appuctertancez, with every prlvilr.Rn, rl ht, title Intomet and oatata, down and right of ,4mwcr, reversion, remalmlcr and ratrmmtt literal* belongmg or�n anyw{eo ayper- tafning: TO HAY£ AND TO IiOLD the some hm fee obnple forever, rLtd Via Bald purties of tits first part covenant with the Bahl party of the second part that they are lawfully acltcd of •lho Beal pmratma that they rn• free from all vocunrbrances except ad valorem taxes for tiro year 1975. and that y have good right and Iawfat authority to Bull the auto; and that Me Pahl Imn lee of the first part do homhy fully tmrrautl tits Lille to the avid land, anti will defend tan raver ttguiaet the lawful claims of all Deem. whonrmorer. IN WrIWESS WIIL•'REOV. the said port fee of flu• Aral Iatrl have hereunto not their hands and Beals the daT artd year aboty wAttan, Signed, Sealed "4 Delivered U Oar .sanest ' .. Ytyr .. _ !/.•i°t :K.�.9 j,�r (SEAL) btate oL__. FLORlo� pbc -a -.6 -2a Ply °i:i Y f N1:I l.A$ (Coulltp or__ ....... I IIEKEBY CERTIFY, That on this 28th day of July A. D. 18 75 , bofom ran parsonally appe:rod George W. Pierce and Victoria M. Pt:rco, his wife to mr huona to Ire fro pL-mn doscrlbod in and ahe rzeautoil tho foretro:ug convo)anon to Coneral Telephone Company of Florida and severally acknowledge the execution thereof to be their free act :uul doss fur the one and purposco thorela mentloned; 3ihrn *-i % WITNMS'rt5 eignntgtegUd official veal a4 A, MA in the County:0.,�.- �d�.,..�i_rtAA --r _. ... an.1 State of .,�z0/?,��/a• the day and year last nforessld.;, . r ` amisefoa E � xR.'.3:r"" � .._._.__ /i.i 4_ !Sef =!7_ SEALI my Cot tl` Notary Yublie � . Ln . �t�rx�vti .�'i�r'�:�iR�''S�:�.+i.:�r�k � ••r'Y,�rQ�xi��' instrument prupdfW -hy, Iloward K. gutheriurd. Attorney at l.av, P. fm, %ox 11Q, Tampa, Fla. r•.S{ R�(t1RId T� 33601 y t). i t •a,l P Order: CTPA- 200701630 Doc: 2.0111121031BPIOR.4316.23211I1 Page 1 of 1 Created By: boverman Printed: 4/12/2007 9:44:30 PM EST oa' Qli" �. F..43O2 PAGE $ Ci AU WAWrY DEED— •FBRP4 R. E. 1•Sev. Aran I n sunya MIS $8th 08 t im, Panda thi. 'n%+r. ^'� ¢.iy of /,,e:-- - A. D. ie 75 BETWEM peter I!ounarides end Frances N0•marWas. his •� t ivTl oiaetiA«a fi0Nt0a 6 of the County of Piaellos oed $Lto of Florida �f•� •• e thtatp fiacuer :•s•a e pones of tbt arat part. nod General Telephone Cronp4M of Floridm ®p� Qg q P. O. Bog 110. Tempe, Florida 33601 � ,� 4 0F11ii115 = 2 of eau Oouttr of aillsborov& and 3wte of Florida Forty of ft caevad Pant, WITMESSETH, that the m!d putiee of the duet past,, for and la a.nei:leratipa of the glop of TM and do /100 >7qunan, to them is Lund p014 the —aipt whenaf is hereby admoah;dVd, he ve gr-kA. ba moped, P94 Md trgaeferred, and by tbeas pre;arto do grmt, hu%ain; -4 gr.d ezaarfgr unto the 004 Dart y of co ,y f9 pant sud baba Cod rwolu m forerar, a$ that omb.,tn ppnd sA bmd lylag 4ed bateg I* as owey of Pallas . DPA a!* of Florid4 tors parff*ae4! daecdW $2 f.UCM -. Lot 4, 8404 3, Rev.Saed lisp of Sx'oo4voad Tensor. Agcoxdittg to gh® plot thereag rocorded In Pla; _,poglc 8 3+_.a, Publi�e ft6orda of Piuemm Count, F$t11t �° •• Lss` SL=Y- '_1zZ.4S;�kc -r,' T'041P1T1E. B. with ajt Ne taaeps 4. bared'it.meeto and oVputfet�a 'een, rrith ovar pdvnege.. r4tllt' t}tte inteiapt read'Utaea; doe0r and. of demer,.70 -4oe wWer an eanmeat thereto bdo4gC o{ in anpo/+o opppt. tit TO 40-9 82 To UPW tL. roars is lac simple foraPer.' Aid !be `sold patios of two am Putt OMM. "t with 00 setd' party. of'tbo aeetad pact tw they t are *0`14Y Plaad of the .nid pr®irn0 that tb•Y are flea from os eaeumbrwoua e;eept ad valorem taste for the year 1975 i • .1 a am ant ! = bay have good right and korm autawity to cell the sense; and Nat the said parties of elm Gast past do bwtbs folly warsmat Ne tillo to the said Lad. sad Tilt defend the mane myaiuet the ;reds; old= of �Tt Drraona erboamwTes IN MUMS WHM=F, the paid pot its of the ant part have hereunto ant their bando w4 rut a tba day nod grasp abort mrKwp. 84piaL Sealed Card DeUvomd in par b boas•• @ Florida I HERMT CUTEVY, That on tWm 2 , day of tt.q..x._ A. A 10 75. afore we peraaaour appeared Peter Moungrides and prances wou..idea, his wife tome haovg to be the Fuson a doomed in pad ` at eaaeoeod *0 foregeing eou"Paaee to GEtiiBAL TEWK,il HE COM$ANY OF FLORIDA Q US .d eaaarattp adowkAp tba elan thereof to be the4 fret act sad deed for the asea tad parpaaaa t. 7 f. Vesting peed • � t' f i i., �. Ind afdeial end � %_!�¢: Sol orNfr �tettc, � of Ftoo9m at � i .:.•' >tp cow, -h—a"14 Ntearl Pub r '.� Tbia bsttraweat prepw by: Howard R. Rutherford; Attorney at fate, P. 0, Box 110, Tampa, P grids Order: CTPA- 200701630 Doc: 2.0111121031BPIOK4302.8261111 Page I of I Created Bay: Ubovaman Printed: 4/12/2007 9:49:33 PM BST y - 8V17X VAjWYY DQP3— POt9 FL !L 1An FazliaYrntWC �b[s� �iii�8&1$8!(i t3v Ainde thta �� Jay of , A, D. 297 Z�a 8$TWEIM Charles J. Eufemf•a and Joyce Eufemia, his ifs: f4 g of U County of Pinallcpp and atata of Florida poets ®p of the deli Pate, sad General Telephone Company of Florida P. 0. sox 110. Tampa, Florida 33601 of tho Coungi of llilleborough and Stale of Florlde PPV of tho r ngoad put, WITAESSSTtf, thot the sold pates of tjra brat Part, for and is eons Qmuon of tU sung of Ten and No /100 1 Po themin hoed paid, the em dvt wbasmof h Lusby gckpawkdged, have grated, WCM.aed, aald sad band t"4 sad by tbew prey do grant, bomb, cell sad trapafer uMa the add party of iho C—od Pat and Uo b*a woo BuIroo fgmw, an tact tvtalp Patel of lava in tLa c0auty ef. 8'ltrllam , and -rata of k7arida, more p wd-ob* desetUnd as foliose: e44 lob-, Koch 3. Revised mop of Broakwtlod Terrace. according; to the plat ther®off Y ttia�eoxdsti fa P1ett Moak G. Page 34. Public R805Wds of YS AMRs Cgesptys Florida z � s 5' ... • k�::�: - =;�, r.;. }so- �jt;•:id F• •,F,. .F. 3t1t ^. :; e a ., ' t 1 . +i:li'+t ['�.eu3.i!:'�: s n:•G r �':3• :'^'.� f i ....:. r: l.. -i•.. ,. :. - �xF.,a:��'`'.�i.�- •'r'i. ee lu�.t�i` %',• � e.:. Y •+ ; c z ' t ' ' . e ..t�� � •f •�.. •1'NlaJ - './•. C.• .�.... H'.4••:••.h /yi `:I •H'li"Al R�� /� t TOM= with 14 the tenen"th Lere4ltAMn6 rind apH4deaa4eea. with every ydvtiette, �4 title., intarnas aad fMtatr, dower and right of dower, tnverapa •remainder and easeazept tkwreto petoggra; or La aaywLte ggpmr () SAYS, TO HOLD t8o aiesw.ris, fee aimpio'fvrevez. . th9 said patina -of'tha bite fact ' zoatarit with the mild pazty of the secaa twit 4Lat tb, y . n lawhdly ewlsed oP tbs Omid plemfats that tizeT are free Pews all eaeambrapeea excepe L ' and valovu taxes for the year 1973 no thA Choy kume goad r'&M cud h;wfol im9writy to WI the serge; mad 04 the gold part lea of tbs }, vs pert dm Latoby faliy,tratroAt the Utlo tv the said Lad, and wM defend the same sgsfmt the Lwfd dmiara v4 ; d* pa w'! :bosteziee.r. _ . IR W117d MS Y7$ffi OP. the said pact lea of tho 9W past hose he:eanto set their bands pod aaw rim drq aFd year above iarittoa d, 1 aad Dotiwryd is • q 7 i � (-HAL) -•^mac;. j F2(iSlldH,-'- ct; u oRevir ju-4, nff Pinellas „ I HY BEBY CE�PIFY. Thor as tLia d:♦y of N/Z4c A. D Is p.= meow ma penounay appemed Charles J. Bufemia & Joyca E femis, his wifae to me known to be %no pawn desalt" is oa8 ° otm executed the torexnipt wsveye W to General Telephone Coapany of Florida std ft"n ly ar2aev+tedaa the eaeeatiea thateaf to be their free act Mad do9d for iha wee and pspaeso yobs menumsed; QWRNVAUFM `LE{a d I W1fIf�8a �J�� �JA4@eW aural at ✓e�tf turd: - C—W t,Q�' ••9 and State ffiy Comtnir8as IiaPfrsa_ coa:.n...,., .'.+•;c ncr, n:;•a:.z.� Vesting Deed i Y l j I Thb invAument pemtared bre Howard K. Rutherford. Attorney at Law ;. P. 0. Box 110, Tampa, Florida 33601 Order: CTPA- 200701630 DQC: 2.011i121031BPIOR4302.8341111 Page 1 of 1 Created By: boverman Printed: 4/12/2007 9:49:31 PM EST 750SOM '' c. i 4302 PACE 833 QUIT -CLAIM DEED This Quit - Claim Deed, executed thiab4yttdsy of_- _-./f• •. A.D. 1975 by Albert P. Rogers and J. Tweed HeNuilea as the last survilin directors of the DAM Corporation a dissolved Florida Corporation, and as such, the role surviving Trustees of the property of said dissolved corporation for the benefit of the stockholders of said dissolved corporation Grantor, to General Telephone Cowp4ay of Florida, a Florida Corporation whose Post Office Address io: P. 0. Box 110 Tampa, Florida 33601, Grantee, (Oherever'ased herein the termp' "Grantor" and "Grantee" shall ineludo singular and plural, boire, legal representatives a - aastrw of individuals, anti the successors of eorporations) WnMSETR, that the ewid Creutor, for and in consideration of the asps of s ;r' Tea and no /100 Dollars in hand paid by the said Grantee, the receipt whereof is 'bareby sckaowledged, does hereby re4se, release and quit -claim unto the said Creates forever, all the right. title, interest, claim. sad demand which the said 'Creator bas in and to the following described lot, place or parcel at land, lyin; in the County of Pinallas State of Florida, to-wit. 1 •Tot 10, Stock 9, Revised Nap of Brookwood Terrace. according �? to the Plat thereof recorded in Plat Book 8, Page 34, Public Records of Pinellas Coiwty, Florida To Have and to Hold the same together with all and singular the appurta mores theta to belonging or in anywise appertaining, and all the estate, right, title, interest, Us%-equity and claim whatsoever of the said Grantor, either is law or egnity, to the Grantee forever. in Witness Whereof, the said Grantors have her to set their hands and seals :the day and year first above written. Y� Signed, sealed and deliver in our �� . Win. �. �,.,. �•�_ w Albett P. Rogers as surviving Members o of Directors oh1NI.1C Dissolved Flof„rda C Last Board ,oration►, a 4j."=n eeNa Nulled as -ou4 oft . Bole ..:.:, : iF` ' t� `g�Maa�`s "����;.as :� surviving Members of the x.sat Board of Directors of AAUO Corporation, a f;, r, i9 ; �• , : 4iftt rtersir vil", Dissolved Fiprida Corporation �• r -.., .'•s' �' "j Jw Z4 4 art CN'75 rim Of ..�•,., e. c, Wiens. - 7• � = ,_.^ L;a&pfficer authorized to take 4ckpowledgewaCS of deeds and other instramenf's according to the laws of the State of Florida, duly qualified and acting HRRBLY CERTIFIES that Albert P. Rogers and J. Tweed McMullen, as the sole surviving members of the last Board of Directors of DARO Carparatioa, a dissolved Florida Corporation, to we personally known, this day personally appeared and acknowledged Wore at that they executers the foregoing Quit -Claim Deed, and I FURTHER CERTIFY that I know the said persons making said acknowledgement to be the individuals described in and who executed same. �( iN W7TNESS WHEREOF, 1 here+mto set my hrnd and official seat raid Canty and State, this thea`f fl day of '1'5Njbw , A.. D. 1975. Order: CTPA- 200701630 Doc: 2,0111121031BPjQR4302.8311111 Vesting Deed - r. Page 1 of 1 Created By: boverman Printed: 4/12/2007 9:49:32 PM EST Vesting Deed • 0.0'b 6POO 673 D.H. 3903 FOX 381 '971-�pe4 rN 1,.•tyere Tide G-y F.0, t►a„aaa, n.,tea R�QQoRal<a itkhuj.0 ag lA Meyer o ! MA ►rt utl••i•_ l �,rt 10WHtE1m1(R &HEYER ,Gw13 3 Ilk ix is � am qtr are nth deed WAIMO OW -Sm" 689.01 al CLURVAas, HQ=A USEd (64ls 3titralar. Ntsde t44 29th dayof January 1969 , 3911tunu W. L. LYONS and Oi1A M LYONS, his wife, of the county of Pinellas , state of Florida , gantor•, and GENERAL TELEPWIM CONPAAY OF FLORIDA, a Florida corporation , `%`bw post office address Is v 610 Morgan Street, Tampa, Florida. 33602 of the County of ✓ Hillsbbropgh , State of ✓ Florida , g -tec•, 912atoat14, That said grantor, for and in comi&ttion of the sum of----- - - - --- - --- - -- - -- — — TEN ($ 10. 00)--- -- ------------- ^----- ^--------------- Dopxm and other good and valuable considerations to said graptor in head paid try said grantees the raapt whercaf is berrbj�vy acknowledged has granted, bargained ana via to the :aid grantee, and granteei hero and asggnS fom rr, the for- lowing described land, situate, lying and being in Pinellas County, FWda, t0-wit: Lots 13 and 14, Block 3, Revised Plat of Brookwood Terrace Subdivision, according to the may or plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book S, Page 34, Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida. Subject to easements and restrictions of record. F ph'IE) 1 DO ENTARY TA 1F T 1 WM.r1191411 1 ea = tutn9 = 6 3. 0 0 1 o Drool J .r �O."UMENEAR 0 1 Ft,ORE A -S�URU a IcRi and - a grantor does hereby fogy warrant the tick to aatd land, and will defend the same agaput the lawful claim of ail persons whomsoever. • "Grantor and "Vantee are used for singutar or p6u:1, u context requires. 31a w1wras W !reef Grantor has hereunto set grantors hand -rid 4 the d and year Ent above rstitt = SE sealed and liv in our presence; W. 'L. LYONS' • - (seal) 0 L LYONS'- a� "V�l (Sew) IIi (sit} STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF PINELi.AS 1 1 HEREBY CERTIFY that on this day before me, an cEcer duly qualiBcd to take acknowledgmeatr, personally appeared W, L. LYONS and ORA MAE LYONS, his wife, to me known to be the person sdacribod In and Viso executed ebe foregoing instrument and acknowledged before me that they executed the same. 1YITNESS my land and oificfal seal In the County and State left aai 29 'l�daat gf January , 19 69. My commission expires: thj6tujs @tnbec IjDtA" M= VATEdRNISAitURCE D YT tOYYrSSbi1 p IES FIX 2L 1953 •, • ' aeM•aa xYaov -r I•r• �• DaRN'o••r � ... . jt. r .j •:w'f+W�`�a..Lr�.G+:i+r + = +_'� . ... .T •. N f •'� S.�11�11 r. f . • .f Order: CTPA- 200701630 Doc: 2.0111121031BPIOR.3003.381Iill Page 1 of I Created By-, bovennan Printed: 4113/2007 12:54 :18 AM BST i c h � u,M12922 o.e 3008 Fns -.S42 THIS INDENTURE Made this 3.rd _day of FebTrua1:y A.D. 19. Fi9., between.._JAM6S_ RUSSELL MEZZATESTA and MARY ROSE MEZZATESTt,..n1,s. w fie of the County of Pinellae State of Florida partle$ of the first part, and --- .. GENERAL TEIEZJM COMUNY QZ FL_QRIDA, a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of _FIri¢a 10 Morgan Street, Tampa with its office and principal place of business at 6 — _ --in the County of Hillsboro ough , State of_ FloridF party of the second part, WITNESSETH AS FOLLOWS: That the said partJ.P.;3 of the first part for and in consideration of the sum of $10.00,-... _.and other good and valuable consideration !n their in hand paid by the said party of the sezmnd part, the receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, ha Ve _granted, bargained and sold to said party of the second part. its surcess,Frs an.' Rssigna forever, that certain real estate situate in PineI las County, Florida, more parficularly described as follows: Lots One (1) and Two (2) and the .North 25 feet of ,-n Lut Three (3) in Block 'B." of a sQodivision of w of Lots Sixteen (16) and Seventeen (17) and the East 1/2 of Lots Five (5) and Six (6) of .THE PADQETT ESTATE SUBDIV151ON, according -to the map or plat < < m thereof as recor -Jed in Flct Bcok 6, page 59 of rm the P011c Records of Pinellas County, Florida. ^' 9v N � � •- ; ". w ~ � ' �� ^ i�vr�i�hENTitY = ir7 — `" 1;64.90 r i � a � ILoFS And said parties of the first part do hereby fully warrant. the title to said land; and will defend the same against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever, except: Real property taxes for the ,yerr 1969 and subsequent years rind zoning regulation. IN WITNESS WHEREOF the said part 1C« of the first part hn Ye hereV)Atn, signed ;, ;.e 12. name': and affixed the it Real' the day and year first abt7re •wt'itYen, . 0 1 igned, sealed a d del' ered in the presence of q��t5Y 6 MZZATIS-57A W. T__. (Seal) Vesting Deed �1 LN � y J. T I :'TATE OF FIORMA r 3008 , 543 I HVREBY CERTIFY that on thia IJILY of A it 19• !he under- signed authority, persmally appeared led: .',* 'Nk4E M 1." I.TE:; Th 1,; w I I't - , k:mwn ti me its be d(•scribed in and who executed the foregoing in4trunivist and mv•einfly I( - :ct-1 the (-xvviltion thereof to bei-!jl: I 1free act and dc•il for the uitt-m and purpom-.4 'AITNE.Al; it,, hItntl and official Beal the date or aforesaid. Notary Public, State at J.fmg- Idy Commission I-XI)II-11ti :• •1 • •• I ! . 19 - 'AX:. - u G z E :i 7C I i ti Zz G z E :i 7C I i Vesting Deed t7l i tiEE91 aoQ OW THIS Il:DT,."`irtlRE !dada lain =•� # of S68tODOU• r-r- --.-. A. V. 30 gib between, . R03ALP ER• a corporotIm orpadaed aced odatl wr oar the teem of the atPto d _ .,{—wnh its olttce and prdactpal place or bmloea at Cletts•pla er p �,aty Pinolloa __. _ State or - Flor1 the pmt p2et, oaA,. _,_t _ Peninsular Telephone Comppnry. , -. c eorpomelom araanired and mfstlea Rader the loon of the state. FIPd • _ with Ito office aced prfaetpal Dlece or bu new a. 610 F1orBan S��o On CeamW of . $lllCbortnlgh . State of.. Florida trbues y� ofsee adbipo IP 51,0 porara�t StreataTotap¢• �• of ' the w nd part, R7iN$SSETIt AS MWAWS: . to easutaemllCO d ate aqm of..,.Q�9,49_ .. aaa other g.Nd I Cara party of tpo 000ned part, the roodpt whcmI to hmaby lic- e Paid party of the taoomd pact, Ito ouc.=Mm NW ow4m forever. arty. Florida, mete p=UcW W dekatbod m IQU-W: And said party of the Not part does hereby My warrant the Me to cad had, and win defmd the name oeainrt the taafuj dolma of all pemom whomooever, tamp!: a. Taxes and rtaeesamenta levied submeguont to Doom*or 31, 1953. b. City of Clearwater tibning regulations. M WITh -= y=RMF the mid pmty at the brat pan by Ila duly snthorlsed offieom, has bcrouao a jour im name to be stgeod and Its corpomte oral A?Raad the day and year drat above tnittsm WATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF An + A$ OdtOber r immmY CERTIFY that on We - d'p' of�_ Were me, the used authmtly. p.m.-By o9pomeL- k�Y r•.c• �i ...- snit• motba nod Ow Ladtvldoela Cho who mrordty admwkftw that fnamo far and ea b0aff of =Id mepmmtka for the rtes and pur• &=-. . Esrehta alai rho " a flapd to d ott W9 e�a¢�l1m he �1 is Beat the oo�mom euporats ;9fln Dsown{ p tgHml��m 4WOtil9g iha 8oan9 � Dfsostwo oi�.®oFlL 3faMeg d's1�4.SQAtm � 11n*gi • . - r� ar _ Q'aqi° s Order; CTPA- 200701630 Doc: 2.011112103PPIDB.1501.05291111 Page 1 of F Created By. boverman Printed: 4/13/2007 12:54:35 AM EST I�i.r!'i 1! •t.� ii,k;dir ; . wr, +.1 �kxL 1'kaq,tapp • �d ® Y 11 r0 .m b O Wl OO,WO Made Chia 22n4 cloy of �T . df. D. �� 53 �34wo een BOO air. INC a corporation existing sunder the laws of the State of F1oPidra har•ing its principal place of 5usiness in the County of Piii1 a Id State of Florida party of the prat part, and PENINSULAR TLLEPHONL COMPANY whose mailing address lot Tampa, Florida. of the County of and State of part q� of the second part, f° Btnt'14ftah. That the aai¢ party of the first part, for and !ra torasi4leration of the suer of other ralnable considerations and Ten to it to hand paid,by the said part y of the seeand part, the rereilpt , rrhereeT ix Iterehy ar•krtorrledged, has granted, bargained and sold to the "i'l part y of the aerond part, its sucee'JdOPR and j.,rever, the fogouing described lwrd, situate, loin¢¢ and being in Courtly of Pinellas ..Stale aj Florida, to wll; Lot 6i* Block Bn of a HESUBDTVISION of Lots 16 and 17 and the $ast halt (E*) of Lots 5 and 6, pf the PADGE'I`T ESTATr: SUBDIVIsi0N according tp the map or plat rhjf T as recorded in Plat Book 6, page 5% of the public records of Pinellas County9 Florida,-less the SoUth 5 feet of the Bast 100 feet thereof. Jnrl the said party . of theftrsf part does hereby fullyivarrant the title tu Najd land, marl trill ttejenrl the sane against the lair /ul elairrrs (01411 Permits reho»tsuerer, In Witness Wltelreod' the said party of the first part has caused these presents tole signed in its name by Its PreSidelat, and its corporate seal to be afflxed, attested by its (Corporate Secretary the day and Year above wrdtten. Seal) Soeretsiry • _.- --. _ Precrdcl t. yigned� Sealed iwd Delivered in pre"aee. ors �i* 4*,L State od Floi °id a, County or pnELLAS I "alEREB9 CERTIFY. That on this 22nd day or H1W .4. IA 1953, befrore me ersonallli appeared ALBERT L. ROGERB and J. TWBB�MeM1JI,LtM , President and 5lecrotaa�rg respectively of IfOtIALg INC. , a corporation under the laws of the State of Florida , to me knoton to be the persona described in and who executed the foregoing conveyance to PENINSULAR TET.E WH3 COMPANY and severally. acknowledged the execution thereof to be their free aet and deed as aaeh officers, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned; and thae they afflavd thereto the official seal of said corporation, and the said (ketrumerat is the aot aaad deed of said corporation. WITNESS my Signature and olAcial seal at 03rarwatorg in the County o/ Pinellas and State of Florida, the day and Year last aforeepid. �IstiFJLtls�s _ Notary Prablio z Dlisfl Qaoa ate i'�ii uAd do em i I!IS ilfte i b/g 1 ,t r iii its% v' 1 lit „ r. lip R 815 PAGE I AIM%W� "fr-, WGUASIDIAWS DIM VVIEW 5 FM R. 1. 413% M—Ndirld -d t. W. 4 Th to W. 6, IN.. C—m. All Sy Ilk Janu eb�o 3nDolure, executed the .... .................day of S. BETWEEN !�aPVs.Axemtrix of. the Estate of John Atren. .. ........... . .............._......... »_..._ ............ . . ..... .... . ......... . . ...... .......... ..... ..... .... ... . .. ..... ....... . .. .... . . ... ...... ..... ........... .......... ... ... .. ........ . ... . . ..... general TeIeph2ne..Co.m;>anv..of P.I.g.ri.da. . .. ...... .._.party of the MAIIiAig 'addre'69:610. 9,;wj) §t4aetfR.&,, Hillsborough COUnty, Flo second part, WIMMUD: Said par* of the lir# part the Estate of John Atren, .......... .. . th - ----------- ....day a/ September A, D, by petition applied to the County judge in and Pinellas 2 L real t1mg, ;a r&U E, County hereinafter described, averring is it ne�ciiary and expedient to sell the game and also racis and every jurisdictional fact; and the prayer sit said petition hailing appeared to and found by said luder to be reasonable and just and said petition true and the sale to the but interest of jaid...94.t4t:P. ... ..... . ...... . . ........ ...... ......... said Court rendered the order dated the day • of September j D. directing raid /tarry of the first part to sell the raid real estate at priuote sale; and thereupon the said putty of the first part contracted to tell the said real estate to the said party at the second Part forl'the sum of Pollees. to be paida; follows. .9h . ... . ..................................... .. ........ . .. . . ... ......... .... ..... . . I .. ...... .. .. . .. ........... .... .. .. . .. And said party of the first part reported said contract to raid Court, and raid Court being fully advised in the premises finds that the price offered Joe said real estate and said contract fair and reasonable, and that the conditions of such sure such as the intertr; of raid. Estate of John Atren, Deceased ........................ ..... .... ...................... required, by order rendered,on the day of Septergbe, .......... .. A. D-0.1, ratified and confirmed said contract of sale and ordered said party of the first part to excettle the dead ti ,raid party of the second part of the real astats as Vesting Deed I 2315 PAGE183 )OW' Cbexefore, in consideration of the premises and the sum of. ........ _... I Seventy -five Thousand ($75,000.00) - - -- ........... ................._. ................_..._._._._....._.........._._ ................................ ..... Dollars, in hand paid, said party of the first part hereby grants, bargains, sells, aliens, remise, releases, conveys and confirms unto the said parry of the second part, and to_�t;$._..i rX (successors) and assigns forever, said certaln.landrin said County Pinellas • •;,., tY f " "' "° - "'- ° °• ^•••• -•- - •• —•- _......_._..._, $late of Florida, described as follo-td , to- uiit: -, &Lots 9 and 10 and the South 5 feet pf the East 100 feat 0,I,ot'6y lock -B;- 2t;— sub &iv s Can- of"�^PA E2aT�$_ 4TAPES;- Prnel as evniitv........ Florida as recorded in Plat Book 6 'ine Tat`- 'touniY - -yt riia`_5_� ct .� Page 59, Public Records' pf ___ ,an...tt�e_.Ir'Arth_ and _Wp- sj._-AIWA-..- Zpts...J-5Q_1b r...17- antin18en$ lack enis' revised Plat of BROOKWOOD TERRACE SUBDIVISION, Pinellas Count Florida;'_ as _'re'cPxd>rzi— izr..pia'BpaSic $', °.aga....�..•FtY1ti7i ...lie. "4Yiis....yf...... ....said ................... . _...._...--- ..... -.... _ .. its I6 and l7 and the East 1(2 of Lots 5 ! nAl ... ,.of,•...• „__..__ Cogetber with all and singular the tenements, hereditaments and appurtenances thereunto belonging or in anywise appertaining. I 1 Co I1)abz F'” CU 00113 the same unto the said party of the second part, and to- At6.................. I 29XNs (successors) and assign, in fee simple forever. I And the said party „ f the first part Both hercb-= covenant to and with the said party of the se, and part, I I . ....•••ft8 .............. k*c (successors) and assigns, that in all things preliminary to and in and about said sale and this conveyance the orders of said Court and the taws of tender have been followed and complied with in aft respects, In Oftntoo Mberzof, the said party of the first part has hereunto set hand and seal on this the.day and year first above written. Signed sealed an•' delivered in the presence of ���"���— — .// ...- ......... .. (Seal) _ . ._........_._....._... ALE xecutrix ..................__........ .................._..........of the estate of I ............ �•••••••••• •_....._. John Atren,• Deceased .............. ............................... . ... ............................... I 46tate of 510ribR QLountp Of_.... Dade ............................... .................. :...... } j Before me, an officer authorized to take acknowledgment, personally appeared..PY.!R,# - JARM as xecutrix of the Estate of John Atren Deceased ................ ............................... . ... .........•..••.• ............... s... ............ well known to me, and known to me as 1Idie individual and the official (guardian) representntive here and there acknowledged before me that "••- •- ••&hp.•••••••••••••— •..... executed the foregoing deed in the capacity as set forth thrrcin. I �I it2ieS8 my hand and official seal this ............... .day of. ..... :r.'�:nuarY 1 A. D. 19.`x'6._.... �° '.iF ., _ .........Kota .. .._ .............................. •J _ {Sral) MART Rl1A d URGE c C `;: :14 : My > IFS-31-70;1W ......_ ................... i o p o xpre s Vesting Deed 7 �- `t'4U14609 �. x.4130 PAGE1755 1•riatrd for taw„ •r.' 'nilr Guannq Fund, Orlando, Florid, This Inxtnnnenl wawa prepared bye \amr y 8��t,BTi -�. H4$QLD...1L. Atdrers�oeE �Yeftue • �` �eC 5TAMORY FORM. —XVION 684,01 EV, Clearwater. Florida 33516 (0410 3Itlbrilhtrr, glade this 30th day of January, 19 74, Wrtwrell ` JAMES T. WALKER and SARAH WALKER, his wife 1 of the County of Pinellas , State of Florida •, srantor•, and EE� GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY OF FLORIDA, a Florida Corporation Maine post office address Is 610 Morgan St., Tampa, Fla - 33602 i of the County of , Wit of , grantee', 1 litt"t5litt4. That suid grantor, fiir and in consideration of the sum of O.V.C. and Ten ($10.00) and no /100•-- - - - - -• ----------------- r--- t)on.rs, E and other gtrx[ mat valuable considerations to said grantor in hand puld - aid grantee, the mxipt whereof is he uekoinvielgmd, has granted, bargained mid sold to the said grantee, and i mtces heirs and assigm.forever, the fit Inwi ig described fund, situate, tying and Ming in Pinellas County, Fforidh to -wit: Lots It 2 and 7, and the East 75 feet of Lot 5, and Lot 6, LESS the North 10 feet of the West 125 feet thereof, of F. A. KENNEDY'S FAIR TAW ADDITION, according to the map or plat thereof, as recorded in Plat $ook 11, page 16, of the public records of Pinellas County, i Florida. µfi -' 'Sub�ect to — easemerite aiid- xesl:riefi'tin of'metfr�� ° "' � -- ! Subject to taxes for 1974 and subsgquent years, ARY FWRlbq \�SUR �� �gu s N S M r dtno l� 2.7 .0 a.:{ =ins. >t . and said grantue dies herchy fully warrant the title to said huid, and will defrral the surge against the lawful claims of all prisons whornsixver. "Crantiu" and "1;r4utee' we !taco for %hignlar or plural. as context requires. +' lit Witnros Obtrrof. C utot has hereunto so ganhtt's h id and seal the day and year first above written. r Sigi 1. srnkd amt del' • -red h our pros ce. - 1 ,:r a ter . _ vS([ L s T., W ...- .(Seel) Sarah Walker r'�E1 - - (Sol) , tactKtt:oo"" — — i bT)IN OF �S • cat xTY OF 1 11HREMY CF.11TtFY that on this they before tar, nu affce, tbrly qualified to take ack,arwhdgnients, personally j aplimin•d James T. Walker and Sarah Walker, his wife, i to nn• kiamtn tv he• thr pe•rsiniS desrrninl in aunt who eie4.utrd the foregoing instnutaat and acknowledged before i nn' that t ti.•y executed the same. i t @iTNESS at) hatet and official still in the Qiunty unit Stub• last rhnt -said this -Yd dxy of ( s is 74. �Y" A ley cti n nNstno expires• r.T ` Notary Rii,irc Return: Robert A. ersteen t,T� r••• .... 610 Morzan $t. r� Tampa, Fla. 33602 Order: CTPA- 200701630 Doc: 2.0111121031BPjOR.4130.17551Ill Page 1 of 1 Created By: boverman Printed: 4/4/2007 8:43:18 PM EST FORM star 1ru,1, ►Were QD17 CLAIM Dg0. 74014606 - .WO 1 TYTfa 1.ANlt rwu�o y ...r �t 3 ,�� •}ol�,.K.E.Lt�� co`�:t :'r �(y�(►�' . fd�' �. x.4130 exeei7b� CLERX CIRC D� JWQF Made this 3 day of 'J* 't'" rt � rf, D,19 7/' tpil HEIDI VAN DR=, a single woman, Pinellas o the County of ?nd Sfateof Florida , parim of the fuse part, and General Telephone Company of Florida whose address is: 610 "an St., Tampa. Fla, 33602 y�•; and ,State of Florida . 0! the County of lfnrssrffr r MKY Pf the second part, r that the paid Party the Brat part, for and in eonsMowion of Me sum of --- -- - - -No Consideration- .. - -__.. in lgtn<y paid by the said pa of the second part, the receipt whereof is hereby acknowl- edgged, has rem4od, released and q,.itclatmed, and by these presents does ramise, d retense and gwficiaim, unto shy 4,04 party of W second part all the right, title, interest H Chains and demand which. the sand party pf the fleet�part has in and to the followtnf 9 described tot ,piece or parcel of land, situate lying and being in the County of Pinellas b'tau of Florida, to wit: Lots Z and 7, and the East 75 feet of Lot 5, and Lot 6 LESS the North 10 feet of the West r 4 125 feet thereof, of F. A. KENNEDY'S FAIR LANE ADDITION, according to map or plat thereof as ".. _.. - ragordect•ixt Pxttt °Boo &' L1 e-1 •o:• the ►��; , "fig 6; Pu;, ;i ................ o Records of Pinellas County, Florida. I , il ex � D�Ct!#tEN?ARY: °' ST�k c>P ' Kan °` t O1 .fear Fi0Tfi A -SURTAX O r m « x$ � _• • ' ,;ti OCii: CF EtfM ,qr•:p". t�,;•, {�y.; ai .N•rw '� �` a � � H dM�1'il '- •trity'a'�- 'i.i,,.: t a +tent sisal �to,sa 31aur itltb to Mb the saute, together w*hs alt and for dar the 1 appurtenances thereunto belonging or in a,tyu'ise appek4ining, and all the estate, right, title, interest and slums whatsoever of the said party of the first port, eithiar in law or equity, to the only proper tae, benefit and behoof of the sgid party of Ahe second harE r �n Quires U- 4erraf. the said party of the Itnt part fists hereunto 861 his hand amd seal the day and year. first above taritten. b a, firth a& lion is MW frrata:r: L . l62 v X/A -i c s,t — f m Heidi an Bf4ut ' F t;rn. LOP, 94 ty it of Moan. 0 l �o 0 F e,uq vt Pinellas 3 That on this day porvonaity appeared before me, an officer z dt ly authorized to odminisfer oaths and take aekmmded finents, Heidi Van Brunt to me well known to be the person described in and who esectcdod this' o rPfo, instrwnent and she aeknowtedied before me Oat 0e " * executed the same freredy and voluxtarUy for the purposes thereig expressed.': Cosast o Pv flats � °fetal owl at Clearwater .4. b ! y and s at or Blorida, this - - day of � o�sn �l 1. A. 19 ? � • fir Co-^•. : t • '�. i:.1_,.:L �/, • v e�7'= X:'7�^ {fy Commission A.rfdrrs. J I Vesting Deed >rr-- Order: CPPA- 200701630 Doc: 2.011i12103iBPiOP-4130.175211i1 Page 1 of 1 Created By: boverman Printed: 4/13/200712:54:31 AM EST 4 t:k. 74014601 v0,• 1Y \ALI1M1[ +.w�.y0 v ...� w,,C■ fflarewurf r L4180 rAcF1753 "w.u,°"wn� w� ii:.�..�i"..'1 ��. ri. M r.. w ,.. ,/n,rrrn• wY ��w. ��+�.....i, yw./• wY,.•�•r%• wu�`+�.ww.w. aww.�w� y,.s., �f day of <��crisr r •s• •D. 1973 Anita Van Brunt Bowman (formerly Anita Louise Joined by her husband, George M, Bowman, 1"t "ar-i y andStaieof Virginia and General Telephone Company of Florida whose address is: 610 Morgan St., Tampa, , of the County of party of the first ion, Fla. 33602 and State of Florida of the County of 8$F ,that the said ,.{! o ' Ply of the second part, •3 f Me first part, for and in c ors of tam Of ��--- - - -iry 4onsideration+--------- arad paid by the said party of the second part, the receipt whereof it hereby "IMO vl= d, has reaais4 release and gtitclatmed, and by these presents aloes rd?ft ie, we and quitclaim, unto the satd party of the second part all the r8ght, title, tRtcrut P& and derraand which the said party of the first part has in sad to the galiourinj f ibed lot , piece or parcel of land, &Ouate lying anti beias.g to the ouaty of Pinellas, Skate of Floridac, to wit: Lots 1 and 7, and the East 75 feet of Lot 5, and Lot 6 LESS the North 10 feet of the West 125 feet thereof, of F. A. XEWNEDYIS FAIR LANE ADDITION, according to map or plat - thereof $b -- .reCa1X$g0, in' Plat Book 11, page 16, of the public Records of Pine1rin— PRn -iy-a l,,orid'a:- •-- --•••• :. erg 31N11P Mlb to *4 the sane, together W" all and sbtjular fba appurtsnances thsreuxta bd Iing or in anuwist appertainia�{, and all the estate. right f�itle, interest and oWas whatsoever of the said party of the jlrst part, etthwins law or equity, to the only proper case, betwflt and behoof of the said party of the aeeonaj /art .fin 38itmos W*tuf, the said party of the flrat part has hereunto see his hand and seal feu day and year first above aorsttm. %:"A. VA,_ , c%; A& Anita Van runt Bowman W r e Daman *tit of VIRGINIA aaa3g *Mbff � � That vis this day persoft,44 appeared bdfore bee, aeojJloer duly authorized to adn�ster oath+ and Bake acknowledgmem s, George M. Bowan and Anita Vow Brunt Bosman, husbandt and wii., tO ins mw� UM takes a the persons described is and i,4,h exeaaated ilea 1ors:cii�i Y acknowladjad before boa t"t they -' etecated the saws freely and vduntanTy for JAG p.vpws t thereto +;caressed. TAUN M viand and ojfiefaT seal at e_/ Via° 3i of Ar-F • D. t97a'• and 3 0� rg o at .• i'�y Public My Commrasfo>r Expirts�llit��fi Vesting Deed 1 Order: CTPA- 200701630 Doe: 2.Oi11121031BPIOR.4130.1753i111 Page 1 of 1 Created By: boverman Printed: 4/13/2007 12:54:32 AM EST f - .f/ d 1 � i.c 6 4h ¢ 7 1 I 7YC n � Co i aZ 0 SX& I — O = d 3 2=dv1 —; t' i FORM Or 1f 4 th'"14 9MY CLAIM •CCO. 740UG' OS Yuia L4M; hU..rp.n a �n...r rrl..6f L hio InOWntr 1.. k. 41.30 ncdL754 earl- ....rr b..fr. w r}}ww ryvy,Wt tvW. w lnaA M� mw«arhni, ,�.ru�..I /- w�+ +M14 ..yMr•r „•hrr 11,.1ia, fY Yr,/01r.••hW +wrY. ��, aai, y�r wA.n "Ai' wu f.eW%ey7fMWa Mr- aJ,w+tMty aqr. Made tills 11th day of January .4. D, 19 74 11PtMfjT W. 0. Van Brunt, also known as William 0, Van Brunt, joined by his wife, Constance P. Van Brunt, the County f Pinellas and Stateof Florida p,X of the flrstp o' and General Telephone Company of Florida whose address is: 610 Morgan St.; Tampa, Fla. 33602 of the County of and ,State of Florida , party of the second part, ittiP311P that the said party of the first part, for and in consideration of the sure of • - -- - - - -No Conaideration-- - - - - -- , in hand paid by thesaid part;/ of the second part, the receipt whereof is hereby aek;nowl- edged, has remised, released and quitclaimed, and by these presents does remise, refuse and quitektim unto the said party o the second part all the right, title interest id claim and demand whscht the sa party o1 the jbit Part has in and to the ollowind described lot , piece or parcel of land, ailuale king and being in the County of Pinellas, State of Florida, to wit. Lots 1 and 7, and the East 75 feet of Lot 5, and Lot 6 LESS the North 10 feet of the West 125 feet thereof, of F. A. KENNEDY'S FAIR LANE ADDITION, according to mad qr plat thereof as ___ -_ - recorded in Plat Book 11, page 1.6, of the li Pubc Records of Pinellas County, Florida. DQCUMENTAR1'' M r 3t .p P fLOR \{ A SUERTAX �k as N AR ;r:1 o , fglRla If0a1 _ ro — f °Ar11 = Q ail 311111t onb to MOM the sal", together U*4 au and singular flu appurtmanm thereunto beloneinf or w anywise appertainin¢, and all the estate, right, title, interest and claim whatsoever of the said party of th4 first pan, either in law or equity, to the only proper use, benefit and behoof of the said party of the second Part 3n Mass Mhtrtaf, the said party of the first paH has hereunto set hie hand and seal the day and year first abore wraten. BEStse Bra sltnrr a TF vrnw_r. tINCUT, C011R, ratan a P. an Isrunt S u of Marib». M'7� bands at Pinellas 3 11"by anft That on this day personaUjr apppeared before me, an officer duly authorized to administer oaths and take aeknouirSimcnts, 1: . Y. 0, V_R Brunt, */k /a William O. Van Brunt, and Constant P. Van Brunt, husband and wife, to me :Dell known to be, the persona described in and who executed Ills forejw4j! irtatr+grtent and they acknowledied before me th4 y" esarreted the same freely and voluntarily for the purpotu therein ezpressed. 'irdww my hand and official seal at Clearwater Munfu of Pinellas . and State of Ptoiida, this 11th "• day of January d. D. 19 74 . Order: CTPA- 200701630 Doc: 2.Oi1i121031BPiOR.4130.175411i1 1 iot<wy F lic MY Fs. „s. , rs S ;i. �. La7► I my Com ion .i.., Cali j Vesting Deed Page 1 of 1 Created By: boverman Printed: 4/13/2007 12:54:33 AM EST i f ,J~ryt� My a {y D. N �'Szam Sr;ys� 6N x�x5 rdc � 0 n 4 2 �ggA� �iW rj y 'a Ica 0 Vesting Deed WAN IM than ►1,1wry� QUIT CL,7t DIED. 74014605 +1NitiLts.�1l,: � �.+ r. �.4i.:iU�rar�l75i o'�ir`x�t`tecvl��'t�c^o� R: �t�.�� ,,�b��,�•�•I��iii,� 1�1 al � +�� �i1 ��Ziw.arw.+�w.. w i..y MYI NNW W Wti Ivgsrl nl..whNw. ,L.L N,hJ. W a�W �Or OYM1., ir,,..• air a« ql y, n.,rh, ....Ye Xadr this -' V' rh day of t { (( wl -t -r-- d. D. 19 `7 *1=ttt Mary Myrtle Van Brunt Schulte, also known as Mary Myrtle Vctn Brunt, joined by her husband, Edwin P. Schulte, , the County I Pinellas and tale of Florida pay of the t and General Telephone Company of Florida whose address is: 610 Morgan Street, Tampa, Fla, 33602 arc<1 .State of Florida of the County .,f tttttsBet , chart the said pl1 of the second part, face sewer o 4 party of the first part, for and in consideration of f -- - - -No Consideration!----- - - - - -- in hand paid by the said Park ofthesecond part, the receipt u+he.reof ishsrebrj ackknow edged, has rencise$, released and quitclaimed, and by these presents does remise, release and quttclaini N.nto the said party o the second part ail the right, title, interest claim and demand which the said party of the first part has in and to the follo:cing dearribed lot , piece or patel of land, sitcuale lying and being in the County pf Pinellas, stau of I'lorzda, to sift: Lots 2 and 7, and the Bast 75 feet of Lot 5, and Lot 6 LESS the North 10 feet of the West 125 feet thereof, of F. A. KENNEDY'S FAIR LANE -- .......AADIT�Qi�, • aecQrding to map or plat thereof as recorded in Flat Boa& lj',' page'lti; o�th"e �ulr2ie--- ._..._....,• Records of Pinellas County, Florida. -:� DOCUrlrA ?r. FLOR A t �" �i else! UT u MT �11 FL w = va=�UM; =IVV.a ��'•. Rossi 1 T ell "Of allb tq 3101a OW sarru, together with, au and singular as afrp:crtenance -1 thereunto belonging or in anywtse appertainiaj*, and all the. estate, ri 'tht, title, interest and claim whatsoever of the said party a tho first part, either in law or equity, to the only proper use, benefit and behoof of the said party of face second part Jn Mums 94trtnf. the said party of the first part has hereunto set his land and seal the day & d year Just above written. £irsUt?► raD in Gputreararr. Y M tle Van Brunt Scbul Edwin F. Schulte State of Swfoa, lzamdg at Pinellas 3 Im% Girdg 17ea 7n Chas day personalty appeared before me, an officer duly anthorixed to administer oaths and take acAnowledgmsnts, Edwin F. Saaulte amd MrY ::Y-tla VAn Brunt Schulte, husbap�_ and w�.—, to me w9U knottm to be elks person deseribo to a44 who scouted the oregoing m instruent and they aa,E?sdXoisdgddl�rsfora ms that they executed the same Jrseiy anal aai4ntarily•for the pilrpses therein expressed. my hand and 00014 seO at Clearwettfr'. Costu+ty of Pinellas , and $tats of Ron this ;, rt 7-� day of t C{ w 6 tr d. D, 1873 . ,1 ,., t NgbJlr �LM� STKf tf FLC`.'D1 <{T LAltf __ —�v <f- J..•v� "'1 Nt tp•p• " " r' T. 23. 1974 'Notary Publies� ter" iD!lDUI ni; 9 fB91Y. D.E:.::tfi74r .i(y Commission E.rpirrs 1 i t iI F I Order: CTPA - 200701630 ' Doc: 2.0j11121031BPIOR.4130.17511111 Page 1 of 1 Created By- boverman Printed: 4 /13/2007 12:54:30 AM EST M.. 2 `dyr0 1bAB1mY7 Dl£Si0 —FORCI ll. lE. t -Aos -- Flroal�lln Prtnt Co �TunDa 6. k. `Ye30 PAS 8• L141a �nbrnlhiirr, Mario tm, - 92 der of May , A. D. 19 75 gETWEb1Y 8 P 1). Brock and Cleo D. Brock, his wife 4.1 3 ( of the County of FL4e1180 r apd Stale of Florida p patties of ft Ar4 putt, cad @ENEM TEL$FROM CO MM-OF FL•ORIQA P. 0. $oz 110, Tampa, Florida 33601 of tits County of 8111sborougb and Stets of Florida poqy of the -=d yaY4 WITNS 6TH, that tho mU parviee of the Ant part, for and In WadderWou of tare aaeo a TEN apd No 1100 Dolloh toeb- fn hand pow. the teeplpt wbft mef Ill b."hy eelmnsledped. have vaeted, batgnfoed. 00A and t+aaofa¢sed, cod by them ptc=tp em gta 4 Bar=atn. sou and ut-or unto the =a van of am anooail trA aid ieo hft w4 a f�u foz--, nR Oat eattgln pave of land kteg and being bn tha Cogee &tJ.nal lea , and $Belo r$ Morido, oaoso pvtStuju* deeexibad as Won.- Lot 9, of F. A Remnedy' a Pair. mate Addition, aceozdittE to the "p or plat thereof, w recorded to Plat BooA 11, Pop 16o of tAe Public R*corrin of FinelMs Ci,yuty. Florida. ill .., ^ -.: o:•+M :k'L:5. � n.Vao. Qryn TOGE3Ek tdtb: alt the leuamentu, Btaiditameata`znr& Pwfeaenmg with every prK.V, ridbt, two, buv? a Odi at%%a, dovan sari :isl3 of. dower, rararaioa, rcto der nad eawment thereto beloo&K or to egwu,p oppor• lOhkv TO. R".31 .BND TO HOLD the cam 0 to fee ehople fo eYer. Awl the old pelt tell of the Beet part - toveuwot wM as acid pa ty of the t»eond Pmt tbat they i. Dire lewfoUy offiad of the mid protzi m that they we free ftom. aB eacumbrapnw ezcept cad valorem taxes for the year 1975 and tkA t4ray have flood ri¢bt qad bawfal aatlmrity to salt the•. Dame: aed that the said parties of the And past do - 4MAY 90HY wOrMt the title to the Raid lead, end will defend the wme agultot rte IvRM do= CC r1B parew Rbsmaoarrs Uf Wit'A= WMAIZOF, the mid parties of tlm out pwt have haeupto mt t;heir bandy =4 ' CWO tlta day and poll' above'Od tfo. ad. Svala rod De]fveted ht Our Preoem".. t !jS To - IL - t` — —.,-- (BEAW V1 .7 Florida p6A - - I TUMMY 4RRTIb`4, vat oe (bill ®(af G? d day of PLOY A. v. 265 , ,• ' 119m ma pm a By appomd Rog* D. Brock and Cleo D. Brock, his wife to too brown to be too perwaS drmzbcd In and to asoaatW Cho fotegobcg eoaaeMee to GMEM TEIJ'd'1iONE CWANY OF MUM • ad "MOT oafinembodgo tbo oz e;am tbaeof to be their free act and deed fat the nets cad pAp... .I. � uaefamaatloaadi7bgh>�t&d8t .. ...• tmd afotrrfd, — �• '4o0r Mi Con ' ' � -= %.lf'' � w... � _ - •- - - (6EAi.T t Vesting Deed l I f Thb ln4mmentprq=t4 by:Howard 1{, Rutherford, Attorney at.1•aw, P. 0. Box 110, Tampa, Fla. Order: CTPA- 200701630 Doc: 2,Oi11121031BPIOR.4302.828i1i1 Page 1 of 1 Created By: boverman Printed: 4/I2/2007 9:49:51 PM EST Vesting Deed —FORM C i-litav—FraccUln Printing Co.,Tiompa L. 1. 4338 a F $07 43 in 10 ;= o,:Te,'*A;R ture, Moan this quy of Salklidallier A. D. 1,75 li 'jWEE. Lillie M. Clouser, a widow he fist Part, and CENERAJ, TELEPHONE COMPANY OF FLORIDA ofUMQjUn;y*f Pinellas nod State at Florida party or L P. 0. Box 110, Tampa, Florida 33601 of the County of Hillaborough and Slate of Florida party or "'o sect)-ld Part, WUNESSETH, that the said party of the first part, far and In comiderntion of the won, of Ten and No/100 to her to hand paid, the receipt w1hicroof 13 hereby acknowledged, In 8 gratittil. burgainvil, sold and transferred, and by then prtment3 does grant, bargain, P-31 and Lrunsfor unto the wlit party of the - .ad part nod its heir, .1 vicalps Ionver, all Mal cenain parcel of land lying and being in the County of Pinellas and State of k7oridN more panic la � described as fflows: Lot 4, of F. A. Kcanedy a Fair Lane Ids tion according to map or plat thereof as the same appears of record in Plat Boole 11, Page 16, of the Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida A I DOCUMENTARY= S C" M1 ,;,'STAMP_ IIJX . ;GR �14 SURTA MrT. of fiEv"" L I , . TjQ'rs ?11 3 12 9. 4 Z 6 5 Lit' 106 ROOM —I it' TOGETHER with all thr• teneirchts, hereditament3 and appunerrine�.. with evory gh interest arid estate, dower and right of dower, reversion, remainder anti t-111AIDLOnt therein 4io`i1ig1Tjne:'orrl in anywise lkppcn taming: TO RAVE AND TO HOLD the mine In fee sintpla fort.,%vr. If And the said party of Ulm first part covenant with the said parer of the weand pan that she IIII is lawfully seized of the said premises that they are I'me from sit encumbrances except ad valorem taxes for the year 1975 and that 4 to she hasgoad right and lawful authority to sell the =ne, and that the �ula patty r pa of the first, part r do ea hereby to& w, ymfuley warrant the I.ItIr to the said Unit, acid will defe I th%, rnince.agninat the lawrUl claims of all persons 10 so Ter. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said party of the firn par. hn a hereunto sot her hood And meal the day and year above vm'ucn. Biped, Sealed and IDdiverea In Our rieftece. FkE--IAo PC, ;iqplo, O .4--•sr (SEAL) CaUntp Qf_.Pinellas oc-TOVA I ITERESY CERTIFY, That on •lls toy of Sep cub"- L D. 1.975 before late pinniatrally appeared Lillie M. alowl-vir+ a widow to me known to be the person described in and who executed the foregoing conveyance to CeneraL Telephone Company of Florida sdodge the execution thereof to bit her free c4t it dptd for the -, . mad wreaUr w1mo in therein mentioned ir'®trDOeiaa'�leellli :.t 41 U W wig Is 1111 1 n 4 gifivita seal In the County unLY of. and StaleRr the day and Y't Rr My commicalnu n &pIres "EA -�O'tary Public L) This instrument prepar.1 by-: Howard K. Rutherford, attorney -at Law P. O. Box 110, Tampa, F13. 31601 Order: CTPA-200701630 Doc: 2.0111121031BPIOP-4338.5071111 Page I of I Created By- bovernian Printed: 4/12/2007 9:49:49 PM EST 2738 ,nu"r I:u, r �•.,. ,. 1.,. r'rl•[�'Ut�. RETURN TO: ns...,., +...I �f•.w W nn" w..r wrn w• M.r.rru.r LAW DIME J.Jrr w6.4 iAr f`, `�frY ter• '•�' FN. »ar. GO HAIL 8110 WA?iS. P. A. P. 0. BOX 6314 ''"'�' ILARWAIER, FLORIDA 33518 made this 5th day of November Irbon CARL FRICKE, an unrernarried widower, o it W 8 s� d� K3� s C3 4 4 M `3 r° f. i•42,M FAt,E 338 .1. D. 19 74 of the Count of Pinellas in the State of Florida Party of thtlrat part, and GFNF.R AL TFLEPHONF CQMPANY OF FLORII)A, a Florida corporation, whose mailing address in: (,1 0 n"1t%Rr1a1 S[: of the Colinty of Pinellas in the ,Stair of F)o ida i"o.ajc` 33bo i ,party of the second wart, 11itasrs dk that. the said party of the first part, for and in consideration of thesicmof other good and valuable considerations and Tan ,Dollard, to him in hand (raid by The said party of the second part, the receipt w7wreof is hereby acknowledged, has granted, bargained and. sold to the said partly of the second part his heirs and assigns former, the• foilo+rin a drsoribed land, situate. Ming and bring ire the County of Pinellas , State of Florida. 42 roit: I,ot 5, LESS the East 75 feet and North 10 feet of West 12.5 feet of Lot 6, FAIR LANE ADDITION, according to the map or plat thereof as recorded In Plat Hook 11 , page I; ' , Public Rzcords of Pinellas County, Florida. Subject to easements and restrictions of record and taxes for 1974. ,n -�• t3R L2 A A °° _ oT TEaY a t And the said party of the jlrat part doto hereby jiatty uAarrant the We to said 1=4 and will defend the same ao'ainst the lawful clalrns of all persons estr whomroeuer. lu Wita the said arty of the flrsi part hoar here4;1t rot his hand and seat the day and year first ve tie Sittaeitoi3sa�eb aaD 3BrltmnD,tn (Our 11r, ntr Carl Fricke _^ .._.. ^..._. .. _... `�- -n piimlMENTARY EE �auMg td PINEI.LA.S J • 3 )Imbg %stft That on this day personally appearid before nte, an oXcer duty authorized to administer oaths and take aeknutrledgments,. CARL FRICKE, an unremarri d widower, to me well known and known to me lA be t4einditidaal described In. and who executed- the foregoing deed, and he • ' : • acknolcledgrd before me that he executed the same frrrly and vulunta lU fyr the purpo;es therein expressed. my hand and oJicial seal at Clearwater County of Pinellas Slack of Florida, this 5th day of November , ,4. D. 19., My Comm IMAM rumm WAYS of flow" AT (AM 7 Notary Public Vesting Deed 7 I Order: CTPA- 200701630 Doc: 2.011112103[BPIOIt.4233.33811I1 Page I of I Created By: boverman Printed: 4/12/20079:49:52 PM EST Vesting Deed y o t. 3006 ua.537 �6 o(s) t, `b THIS TNDFEWURE blade this -m&day o€ Janustr between A4I-9S S-MM R 2, widow and widow of IMRW H. SCHDHRKS, deceased of the County of gym. 1alk , State of M-1— , party.-Of the first part, and M -NSRAZ A. Im (W =T,.i' A� IL corporation organised and existing under the laws of the State of E1 #14s with Its office and principal place of bueilaeas at 610 Moran $treetA Tampa Florida lu the County cf rt�aborbuo , ttate of Fio party of the second part, WITNFSSM AS FOLLOWS: That the said pert—X —of the first part for and in consideration of the suiii of $ 10.00 , and other good and valuable consideration to her in hand paid by the said party of the second part, the receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, hats granted, bargained and sold to said party of the second part, its successors and assigns forever, that certain real estate situate in -- pt+,Etlle- County, Florida, more particularly described as follows: Lot 9, Less the Best 10 feet of F. A. ISNt3DXtS PAIR LANE ADDITION, according to a map or plat thereof recorded in plat Book 11, page 16, PubLtc Aecords df Pinellas aixmty, Florida. subject to any existing easements aid restrictions of record. DS�SURTAX e.t<:. Fi.aAl A u m 1 B. 5 0 v x eL ° teat sue.' . And 8314 partY--of the first part do€sL hereby fully warrant the title tb said land, and will d�tend the Same against the Iawf clair4s of la�g��a8'whonr8oe�ec'"t•, �n"c.'°' "`'^"`�'•' Real property taxes for the year 1969 and subsequent years and zoning regulations. N �- ' o�, FIrORlDAI N D M ARY STAMP TAXI c+'M.trotue i - = ea =►r�.re � � 6.0 0 1 o = +cut ) IN VMiTF,48 WHEREOF the said partat__..of the first part hs.a hereunto signed her n me_and &W=ed her seal the day and year first above written. Si ed, sealed and de ' e the presence of AG 5 S CdiUfiRlE , wi ow .a Sti oW U7 of R14AN H. SWUHRXS, deMMpd (Sell) ' (Seal) Order: CTPA- 200701630 Doc: 2.0111121031BPIOR.3006.5371142 Page 1 of Created By: boverman Printed: 4/131200712:54:19 AM EST STATE OF FiARIDA j +'53$ COUNTY OF j • iTIItLLAS I HEREBY CERTNY that on tbjm ALp �day Of January , A.D. 19 69 before mo, the undersigned aut#iorIfy, pem aiiy appeared. AM AdmMU : w1dwt Ana vldar of H93M N. SOMMUR ds�aiQ kAOwa to me to be the persons deeoribed in and who executed the foregQlag ipstrament and severauy ac- knowledged the execatton thereof to be—,A,frse act and decd for the Uses and purposes therein mentioned. ` .. •` tie :rr4 S. hand and official sad the date of sroresaid. flu Votary Pu . c, State at Large my CommW ioa i expires �d 19 . Cy�yOccpp+ 3X ,%.3 P. 19 lu Q ta Order: CTPA- 20070I630 Doc: 2.0111121031BPJOR.3006.5371112 m m viers l CS Zen SD a •.h DO O M ri Cy�yOccpp+ 3X ,%.3 P. 19 lu Q ta Order: CTPA- 20070I630 Doc: 2.0111121031BPJOR.3006.5371112 m w Page 2 of 2 Created By: boverman Printed: 4/13/2007 12:54:20 AM EST i i S r i r fi E 3 ,Re i T �y a WARRANTY DEED —FORM R. E. i•Ray— FrankAn Pr[niinr Co.,Tampa av OIWL IDIa day of Hacch , A D. is 74 , I HLrwESN James R. Mezzatesta and Mary R. Mezaatestu, his wife j a x•4159 NtCf 6 1 of tba County of Pinellas and State of Florida � patties of the Asst pat, and General Telephone Corapsny of Florida P. 0. Box 110, Tamps, Florida 33601. p� of the County of Hillsborougb lied State of Florida pUW of the fr1 teronJ part, w1TNESSETB, that the toad p{rt lea of the Arst past, for utd in «+nsWgntieu of the no of {p'' TEN AND NO /1v0 DOW* to them in hand paid, the receipt ahunof L koft mUowledted, have ttaated, bs lsbKd, add and barltferml, and by Muss pram4 do p-t, battatu, sell and trandv unto tLa Aid party of the tsxaod put and its UW and asaitaa ioteveg ap tpat - xatsfs pacat of lead ii•Llt spd bint in tbs Count' y: of Pinellas . sad State of Ffocldy arcs psrtteuWy dtwS tt d as fottowat Lot 8, F. A. Kennedy's Fair Lane Addition, Less the Southerly 25 feet of the Easterly 10 feet thereof, accordiog to the well or plat thereof. as recorded in.Plat Book 11, Page 16, Public Record,& of Pinellas County, Florida mm � �t. i�'m i� I .•�,.. '- - - - -._ .�:irt.ir�. - v .q .�; �. •tj; �, •i fit'" 54 < t ; This lsetrumcnt prepared by: Howard K. Rutherford, Aetorney 3t Law P. 0, Box 110, Tatopa, Florida 33601 Order. CTPA- 200701630 Doc: 2.Oi1112103PPIOR.4159.5611l1 Page 1 of 1 Vesting Deed Created $y: boverman Printed: 4/13/2007 12 :54:34 AM EST i `i • WARUWTY "U10 -47OR I R. 8. i•B¢rir- FvwkHA Wfnttoc Co.,'hmye WOO boo tture, tfade eLla ZS Ar. day of Jrnwry , A. n., 10 75 , RK:'1vMj0hn A. sad Sharon L, Patterson, bis wife r44 tfw 0Mt7 o7 Pinailas wed State of Fluids i M • past Los of tlrt ArAt inac, lead Oatt*ral T*1*Photfa Cospaay of llorfda ' rt P. 01 Box ltif t i Tampa, Fiovidd 33601 of tbs Ctotuty of Nil1*borough xLd State of Florida► Derry of the ji *Mood part, WMW.WP, twat tbo add puties of the W pate, fvr sad in maddsrOkm of the on of :I TM ar,d Ho /W11ars Do3atsq y` to them in hand Paid, ela reWA- wweraof b bwt&Y sckaovkdyvd, Uwve granted, wa:<aioed, void "d a{ ft a.tad, aid by throe Pr. is ds feapf, wsrtatu, ore and tranat r Data tae *W Party of rho :f aaosad Dart clad its bedre and QWZDN fonsw, oll tw "rW.0 Partal 0 ]sad Iri *g and Oohs A ow Covrsa' of vKvAllaa , clad swig of Florida, mam p4lenln'iy duvIed as fagowat p ! L+oxr t7:tand 6, Block 3, Brookwood Terrava• Revived, as rvoorded in Plat Hook S, Paget :t 3$ of he Public~ Records of Picellas.Cotmty; Florida Y[ts 11�ax tea (14) f¢st of the S9vth tvaafiy -five W) fao of Lot & and that Y. st tX ° tap (10) feet of the North twenty -five (25) feet'of Lot 9. Remedy's Fairless '• Addixift, as rtcorded In Plitt Hook 11. Page 16 of the Pablio Records of Pin*11ar ' CMM$t , Florida - TOtILTF= With all the tue nOm% h9ridkiviftns and apPurtenaueee, • al.. eveiy PrivflRm right, two..intaraat aad.eatcta, dower sad 7 fit o! daaar. arnsrma. ;im*dm and *-=meat thatto -&hm&C or in anytdao rjFetr a - tawrlert TO BAVE antr TU t OLD Wu #me tea fee *vle ioterer. . 'And the M& Pattie* of tht lira ywA cot'iadnt With tho toad pa-7 of *4 W Md plot thAtifey ar :fit ; , � tawftatr sebed o! the oo!a peaadsao tact they tee kaa teoat sII wcstalnapoea tncapt ad vtaloram cases .for tie -year 1975 r lvod tl*wit sad Ltdol aattwe[t,Z W sdt the aamat sod clot tlts std partial at:tis dae!•poutt • . r• dde Frrvrh � the tick to the laid wty51, and adli difsad the ason'anfart tM,Ya>�S1I akdsa Oi'. ' 1% WrAum W93MMP, the Ovid parties kf tie drat part ttaYe wnvmdo as their heads sad q sal the dal Md Sear above wrfttva. • � -Be" aid Ddir ttd is P a: (82AL) • '' •pe; t� �- S RKCIRGUIiCWR _ ' <` WIMM T3 FI ti YS711S g I 1 CFJt41FY, ,W on tau r T� der of Janpary A. D. 19 75, rotors me vv-mn4 &PPS John R. sad Sharon L. Patterson, his wife f to me knotro to be tas persona 4rAcr ed in and '3 d 3d rho itxagolnz warsynwn to Genassl Telephone Company of Florida A Nil , aq►tiL,'iaaVtrnYJM.Wu4P tha e:omu t %amf to ws thels i:ce set and doed for t#te ttaea sad Ptvpoau Mal , and style _. Thb InvWtneot Pn!Puvd t7t nars•, e r ..,.. «c.. , __ _ Order: CTPA- 200701630 Doe: 2.0111121031BPIOR.4263.18121112 l Page 1 oft Vesting Deed a Created By: bovennan Printed: 4/12/2007 9:49:37 PM BST 2 q C> C) O K=) O ova 0 a• -P is 00 trJ cn Z" z! 4V v mum Y To ABOTR= Or MCUMOI! 44 Z" z! 4V v iL ClQ Cl Lz: L, TO ABSTRACT a." ARSORIMrom —I 11 01.1 7t cn 00 --r- C:o CD O C14 I.. C, C4 oq t- oo C, 0 icl C:) m %0 C) t— CD C> L; I 0 M )P-3133 -tA58 .J1 .'t f•` J QCITCLAI \: HEED THIS 11,DEN7LtP.E, trade thisrday of A.D. 1969. bttwecnCFYERAl izir1- I10ncomi -AN QFFLaRDA, a curpo:xtion existing unaer the !ew:..I tha .State of Florida. Count) of llillsborougb, garty of the first pzrt, and the CITY OF CI Faille' PTFP, FLORIW., a municipal corporation, party of the second p%rt: WITMESSFVit 7bat the eaid party of the first part, for acid in co:talder&tion of the -um of 'W- r'allar ($1.00) and other fa3d and valtuble conaidercti,nz, to h.nd paid by tic party of the second part, the receipt v,hereof is hereby i ackrouledged, his remised, released and quitcle_i °aed, and by these preserta dot. rcrtisc. release and quitclaim unto :l:e ;!id ptrLv of the second part, its succe-jaarz and assisns forever, all the. right, title, interest, claim and demand r.hich the party of the first P:.ft t ±a in and to the described property situate to the County of Pinellas, 4tatt: of Florida, t; wit; The nest 10 feet of Lots One (I) and TNO (:).and the North 25 feet A I of Three (3) in Block I'D" of a subdiviafon of I at$ Six-ton (l o) and °everteet: (17) and the F.st 1/_1 of Iots Five (5) and Six (6) of THE T ArGFTT °STF,TE y. SLIBDIYL4ION. according to the map or plat thereof as rF, t e_ recorded f-, Plat Book b, pate 59 of the Public Records of, s n Pinellas C-'rurty. Fl,)rida; �Me- tND u+ .a The t- est 10 feet of the follot;ing described property: 'Atz: an Iet 9, .ass the Fast I0 feet, of F. .'. M:XNEDY S FAIR I ANE 1 DDITIONO according to a :nap or plat thereof as recorded in Plat Boole 11. pa jL 16 of the Public Records of 'Pinellas Conuty, Florida. This deed is given for rigtt of ,+ay F.rrposas. TJ 11A7.17 A,tD TO hOLD *%c sae:;e together with all and sir;ular the appurtenance: thereunto belonaina or it: 4r,"ise app:rtairine, .9n3 all the estate. rigbts title. irtereat .nd elair..:.batzocvcr of the said party of the first part cithtr i.•t ".% or equity, to 1to only proper use. 'botieftt a.-%d bthoof am Order: CTPA- 200701630 Doc: 2.0111121031BPIDR.3133.3581112 Page 1 of Created By: bomman Printed: 4/13/2007 12:54:21 AM EST .t P :313 --,-359 Of the said party of the second part, its asceessors an¢ assigns forever. IN WITWI$M kHE:rtFOF, the <_aid party of the first part ha: caused tl•atc presents to be duly executes b;• itt proper officers and its corparatc• seal affixed, the datt'hereln fiat aboyc written. GrN3HA�I T LEFHON NIS%AIJY f): FL .IIT> STt f- t By, , 4� \r.i ', bCiW�� ice' Fj dent Y Secretary S • STATE CF F10RIDr ,DUNTY OF MUSBORJuCH r. I HEREBY CERTT -FY that on the - 17 c:.y of before me, the undersiyner: autborlty, personally appeared J and _ t . A Vlce President and Cgcrotary respectively, of General re!ept,one Company of Florida, a ,;u- .}aratlm.i sander the lav:s of the $Late of Florida. to me known to be the pers :ns described in and who executed the for +going lmtrument and teverally ackAgiwledgee the execution thereof to as their free ict and deed as such officers, for t.`.o uses and purposes therein mentioned, and the said inssru=.rnt t¢ the act and decd of said corporation. +'FITNESS my signature and Official s :il in said County tad State the day and year ]sat aforesaid. My Commission Expires: �+ahF.34b NpyttdLaid Mt L:xy,p:a j,7,;;; rr ae .•�. Order. CTPA- 200701630 Doc: 2.q 11 121031BPIOR3133.3581112 Page 2 of 2 Created By: boverman Printed: 4/13/2007 12:54:22 AM EST ��` =`?r'� t •t+a: "'''>y • r.1,. +'�;Y"'G".►r.'.'` wit" �. rry,.'„ nc'y..•:'.•' ? °•- 5- ••a.- ,•-r.'•• \ ��wJ• )A IUI tk" Qg el. ;tY DI.jD, J�f��(,7 'rUT0LA4X Aao,% 60 YL1 / (►feO (:9r jm v fr ryryJQ(3wFMfssyy3t7 a ■An//r• b �1.. f,r fnw •p,ry` Nntl Nebir IA1 rtN. ,•raven( N,TI/wNgM, rWpnnryry wwi ��r orw' //N�IAt..vP+rrrr MnNt le.rfr. f�r wr./fM N.JW nY�Mr • Ibft u/eWrf DtYraR 1i flry4 fqr dw(vryr rM wr YJnre Jr.t /r l�.11 iedmlr .� .bn .� rJw..L tAr y.w -Mr• 4di nrhefrrJtfM+Nri nrn,n dnm4d i/ wr Hade this 20th day of July , •1. A 1970 Between GENERAL TEL);PRONE COMPANY OF FLC)IUDA a corporation existing under the laws of the State of Florida party of thefirst part, and CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA, a municipal corporation, , of the county of Pinellas and State of Florida pwhj of the second part, Witnvaseth, that the said party of the first part, for and in consideration of the sum. of - ------- -- - - - ---- - -- --- One --------- -- - -N---- .Dollars, in hand paid by the said parly of the second part, the receipt whereof is hereby acknowl- edged, has remised, released and ggitclaimed, and by thess presents does remise, release and quitelaim unto the said party of the second part alithe right, title, interest claim and V'emand which the said party of the flrat part has in and to the following described lot , piece or parcel of land, situate lying and being in the county of Pinellas State of Florida, to wit; p, 'West 10 feet of the South 25 feet of Lot 3, the West 10 p, yr lee Of loots 4.5, 6 bat ; esn 1 6 un o a get s m =r�... 'd a Estates, Plat Book 6r page 59, as recorded in the Public Nn Records of Pinellas County, Florida. ooQ a F v p This deed is given for right of way purposes. s � G =M L s 4 Party of the First Part may use the subject property until M _ such time as the property is required for widening of Betty Lane. jai ;4 2�3 DOCUMENfAAY TAT D E o> F ORIDQ) �� m FLORI A �,► N OCU E TAQY STAMP TAXI =0 Q 3,0:1 To Have and to Hold the same, together with all and singtclar the appurtenances thereunto belonging or in anywise appertaining¢, and all the estate, right, title, interest and claim whatsoever of the said party of the first part, either in law or eyuityf to the only proper use, benef(t and behoof of the said party of the second part. in Witnem Whereof, the said party of the first part has caused th presents to be o9gned iniiti #am y itser�sident, ;sit • and its corporate seal to be agxed attested b itr F'orporatp secretary the day and year above teritten. Seadj' i GENERA T p COMPANY OF FL y Jce President. Secretrsry 51 ed, gealed sad Delivered in Our Presence: ev a r e 4—'�C" fee, tvsfa Order: CTPA- 200701630 Doc: 2,011112103JBPJOP0379.1091112 Page 1 of 2 Created By: boverman Printed: 4/13/2007 12:54:42 AM EST t State of Florida, 1 n 1 J L.'. 33Iii PAGE ��O F County of Hi1LLSBOROUGH I HEREBY CERTIFY. Thar on this 20th day of July 4. A 1#70, before me personally appeared Vice E: L. LANGLEY and D. A. BROWN , respectively/President and Secretary of General Telephone Company of Florida , a corporatign under the lams of the State of Florida , to me known to Se the persons described in and who executed the forejoin j conveyance to City of Clearwater, Florida, a mynicipo.l corporation and severally acknowledged the execution thereof to be their free act and deed as such officers, for the-uses and purposes therein mentioned; and that they affixed thereto the official seal of said corporation, and the said instrument is the act and deed of said corporation. WAINESS my sifnature and official seal at Tampa In the County of Hillsborough, and State of Florlda, the day and year last aforesaid. Newry h61k Sbb d Florida d tat=! My Commission Expires �"k°o °txgarlu'is,diaryPublic ;.• ���- Order: CTPA- 200701630 Doc: 2.0111121031BPIOR.3379.10911J2 1 Page 2 of 2 Created By: boverman Printed: 4/13/2007 12:54:43 AM EST IT'Y OF C LEARWAT'ER POST OFFICE Box 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758 -4748 MUNICIPAL. SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TFLEPHONE (727) 562 -4567 FAx (727) 562 -4865 PLANNING DEPARTMENT March 19, 2008 James Shimberg Holland & Knight 100 N. Tampa Street, Suite 4100 Tampa, FL 33602 -3644 1% RE: Development Order - Case FLD2007 -11035 1280 Cleveland Street Dear Mr. Shimberg: This letter constitutes a Development Order pursuant to Section 4- 206.D.6 of the Community Development Code. On March 18, 2008, the Community Development Board reviewed your request for Flexible Development approval (1) for the Termination of Status of Nonconformity for Floor Area Ratio [FAR] (1.27 FAR existing /proposed; where 0.55 FAR permitted today) and for building height (86 feet existing; where 50 -foot height permitted today) in the Downtown District (East Gateway Character District), under the provisions of Section 6 -109; (2) to permit the improvement of the existing site and parking areas for a "utilities /infrastructure facility" use in the Downtown District, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2- 903.C; and (3) to permit Nonresidential Off - Street Parking in the Medium High Density Residential (MHDR) District with deviations to reduce the side (north) setback from 10 to five feet (to pavement) and to allow the placement of landscaping on the inside of the buffer fence /wall along the north and south sides of the property, as a Residential Infill Project, under the provisions of Section 2- 4041. The Community Development Board (CDB) APPROVED the application with the following Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and Conditions of Approval: Findings of Fact: 1. The 3.33 acres is located on the north side of Cleveland Street between N. Betty Lane and N. Fredrica Avenue; 2. The property owner owns the entire block between Cleveland Street, Drew Street, N. Betty Lane and N. Fredrica Avenue, except the residential out - parcel at 22 N. Fredrica Avenue; 3. It is the owners' desire to split off the northern portion of the parking lot that is no longer needed and sell it for residential development; 4. The buildings and a portion of the accessory parking lot is zoned Downtown (D) District, while the majority of the accessory parking lot to the north of the main building is zoned Medium High Density Residential (MHIDR) District; 5. The property has been developed with the utility /infrastructure facility for some time, as well as the accessory parking lot on the north side of the building; "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE, ACTION EMPLOYER" March 19, 2008 Shimberg — Page 2 6. The land area to be retained for the Verizon utility/infrastructure facility will be 145,135 square feet (3.33 acres); 7. The main building currently has 185,184 square feet of gross floor area at a height of 86 feet measured from the eastern property line; 8. The Floor Area Ratio, based on the land area to be retained for the Verizon utility /infrastructure facility and the gross floor area of the main building, is 1.27; 9. The intensity standards adopted for the East Gateway Character District sets a maximum Floor Area Ratio of 0.55 and a maximum height of 50 feet for office uses (which this is most similar to); 10. The existing Verizon utility/infrastructure facility is nonconforming to both Floor Area Ratio and Height; 11. The development proposal includes a request for Termination of Status of Nonconformity for Floor Area Ratio [FAR] (1.27 FAR existing /proposed; where 0.55 FAR permitted today) and for building height (86 feet existing; where 50 -foot height permitted today) in the Downtown District (East Gateway Character District); 12. The applicant proposes to upgrade their parking lots to City standards and improve the property to landscaping requirements; 13. There is no parking requirement for utility/infrastructure facilities in the Downtown District. The applicant had prepared a Parking Demand Study, which determined a parking need for 105 parking spaces. This proposal includes the provision of 145 parking spaces, which will more than meet their identified parking need; 14. The primary parking lot on the north side of the main building will include the removal of the small, one -story building to allow for the improvement of the parking lot, cutting back the pavement to a 10 -foot setback from N. Betty Lane to install landscape screening for the parking lot within the D District and cutting back the pavement to meet the required 25 -foot front setback from N. Betty Lane and installing landscape screening for the parking lot within the MHDR District; 15. The applicant is requesting a deviation to provide only the required setback of five -feet along the north property line, as well as requesting a deviation to the flexibility criteria to place the required landscaping on the inside of the required fence rather than the outside of the fence. This deviation request also applies to the south side of the property adjacent to the residential out - parcel at 22 N. Fredrica Avenue, where the required fence is proposed along the property line and the landscaping is proposed on the inside of the fence; 16. Foundation landscaping will be installed along the edge of the building along N. Fredrica Avenue and Cleveland Street, which will aid in softening the building fagade and improve the street appearance of this otherwise blank -wall building; 17. The landscape design represents a dramatic visual improvement to this site, one that will provide visual interest and shade to the parking areas, as well as substantially enhancing and upgrading the neighborhood appearance; 18. There are no outstanding Code Enforcement issues associated with the subject property. Conclusions of Law: 1. That the development proposal is consistent with the Flexibility criteria for Termination of Status of Nonconformity as per Section 6 -109 of the Community Development Code; 2. That the development proposal is consistent with the Standards as per Table 2 -902 for the Downtown District and Tables 2 -401.1 and 2 -404 of the Community Development Code; 3. That the development proposal is consistent with the Flexibility criteria as per Section 2 -903.0 of the Community Development Code; March 19, 2008 Shimberg — Page 3 4. That the development proposal is consistent with the Flexibility criteria as per Section 2 -4041 of the Community Development Code; 5. That the development proposal is consistent with the General Standards for Level Two Approvals as per Section 3 -913 of the Community Development Code; and 6. That the development proposal is consistent with the Design Guidelines of the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan. Conditions of Approval: 1. That, prior to the submission for a site development building permit to effect the site changes, a Release of Unity of Title and Minor Lot Adjustment application be submitted to and approved by the Planning Department; 2. That, prior to the issuance of a site development building permit, the owner deed as additional right - of -way, or dedicate as a right -of -way easement, to the City of Clearwater the southern 10 feet for that part of Lots 7 — 10 along Cleveland Street; 3. That the shrubs along the north side of the existing detached dwelling attain six feet height within three years; 4. That the existing overhead utility lines which run along the east side of Betty Lane be placed underground prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Completion on the site improvements building permit; 5. That the relocation of the existing overhead utilities serving 22 N. Fredrica Avenue be in a manner and location acceptable to, and at no expense to, that property owner; 6. That, prior to the issuance of a site development building permit, the site and landscape plans be amended to show vertical curbing along the edge of pavement for the equipment service area on the west side of the building adjacent to Cleveland Street and N. Betty Lane; and 7. That, prior to the issuance of a site development building permit, compliance with all requirements of General Engineering, Stormwater Engineering and Traffic Engineering be met. Pursuant to Section 4 -407, an application for a building permit shall be made within one year of Flexible Development approval (March 18, 2009). All required certificates of occupancy shall be obtained within two years of the date of issuance of the initial building permit. The building permit must be obtained within six months of the initial permit application. This timeframe to obtain the initial building permit may be extended for an additional six months for cause by the Community Development Coordinator. Time frames do not change with successive owners. The Community Development Coordinator may grant an extension of time for the Flexible Development approval for a period not to exceed one year and only within the original period of validity. The Community Development Board may approve one additional extension of time for the Flexible Development approval after the Community Development Coordinator's extension to initiate a building permit application. The issuance of this Development Order does not relieve you of the necessity to obtain any building permits or pay any impact fees that may be required. In order to facilitate the issuance of any permit or license affected by this approval, please bring a copy of this letter with you when applying for any permits or licenses that require this prior development approval. Additionally, an appeal of a Level Two approval (Flexible Development) may be initiated pursuant to Section 4 -502.B by the applicant or by any person granted party status within 14 days of the date of the CDB meeting. The filing of an application /notice of appeal shall stay the effect of the decision pending March 19, 2008 Shimberg — Page 4 the final determination of the case. The appeal period for your case expires on April 1, 2008 (14 days from the date of the CDB meeting). If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call Wayne M. Wells, Planner 111, at 727 -562 -4504. You can access zoning information for parcels within the City through our website: www.myclear-vvater.com/gov/depts/planning. Sincerely, Michae Delk, A P Planning Director S: (Planning DeparUnentlC D BIFLEX (FLD)Ihiactive or Finished Applications I Cleveland Street 1280 Verizon Office (D and MHDR) - ApprovedlCleveland 1280 Development Order 3.19.08.doe Page 1 of 1 Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Monday, March 17, 2008 12:12 PM To: 'Allen Murphy' Subject: Verizon 1:00 pm, 3rd Floor, City Hall, 112 S. Osceola Avenue - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Allen Murphy [ mailto: allen.murphy @murphylarocca.com] Sent: Monday, March 17, 2008 12:08 PM . To: Wells, Wayne Subject: RE: Verizon Thanks! And, where will the meeting be held? From: Wayne.Wells @myClearwater.com [ mailto :Wayne.Wells @myClearwater.com] Sent: Monday, March 17, 2008 12:06 PM To: allen.murphy @murphylarocca.com Subject: Verizon Allen - Yes, I have placed it on the Consent portion of the agenda. We will be submitting to the CDB members at the meeting the letter /email from Dave Durfee. They may ask for clarification and /or I may stand up to clarify the circumstance with the letter and my conversation with Mr. Durfee so that it can stay on the Consent agenda. I think the condition of approval covers Mr. Durfee's concern. We (you and 1) need to be ready to answer any questions should it get pulled from the agenda. So, from your side, whomever can provide such answers should attend. Wayne - - - -= Original Message---- - From: Allen Murphy [ mailto: allen.murphy @murphylarocca.com] Sent: Monday, March 17, 2008 12:01 PM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: verizon Wayne: Is the Verizon project still on consent agenda? Jim Shimberg will not be able to attend and we need to know who should be there. Thanks. Allen Allen S. AlurlMy illuipk_y LaRocca Consulting Group, Inc. 101 fast Kennedy .Boide yard Sadie 3020 Tampa, FL 33602 Qjflce: (813) 226 -8970 Fax: (813) 229 -06.17 3/17/2008 Wells, Wayne From: jim.shimberg @hklaw.com Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2008 3:23 PM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: RE: FLD2007- 11035, 1280 Cleveland Street Wayne, We are okay with the conditions. We understand that the matter will be on the consent agenda. Thanks, Jim - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Wayne. Wells @myClearwater.com [ mailto :Wayne.Wells @myClearwater.com] Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2008 10:22 AM To: Shimberg, James H (TPA - X36412) Subject: FLD2007- 11035, 1280 Cleveland Street Jim - Attached is the Staff Report for the above referenced application, to be heard by the CDB at 1:00 pm on March 18, 2008, in City Council chambers at City Hall, 112 S. Osceola Avenue, Clearwater, FL. I am also attaching a letter from Dave Durfee regarding his property at 22 N. Fredrica Avenue. Please review the Conditions of Approval and let me know if these conditions are acceptable or not. I have talked to Mr. Durfee and indicated Condition #5 is regarding his property. I have also sent a copy of, the Staff Report to Mr. Durfee. I will be checking to see if your application can be placed onto the consent portion of the CDB agenda, since it appears Mr. Durfee is not in opposition to the application, but he does have a concern (which I think Condition #5 addresses). If Mr. Durfee's letter does not constitute a letter of objection, and the Conditions of Approval are acceptable to you, then the application will be placed on the consent portion of the CDB agenda. Thanks. Wayne M. Wells, AICP Planner III '• City of Clearwater 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, FL 33756 -5520 Phone: 727 - 562 -4504 Fax: 727 - 562 -4865 <<Cleveland 1280 Staff Report.doc>> <<Letter from Dave Durfee re 22 N. Fredrica Ave 3.13.08.txt>> 1 Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2008 10:22 AM To: 'jim.shimberg @hklaw.com' Subject: FLD2007- 11035, 1280 Cleveland Street 91 or], Attached is the Staff Report for the above referenced application, to be heard by the CDB at 1:00 pm on March 18, 2008, in City Council chambers at City Hall, 112 S. Osceola Avenue, Clearwater, FL. I am also attaching a letter from Dave Durfee regarding his property at 22 N. Fredrica Avenue. Please review the Conditions of Approval and let me know if these conditions are acceptable or not. I have talked to Mr. Durfee and indicated Condition #5 is regarding his property. I have also sent a copy of the Staff Report to Mr. Durfee. I will be checking to see if your application can be placed onto the consent portion of the CDB agenda, since it appears Mr. Durfee is not in opposition to the application, but he does have a concern (which I think Condition #5 addresses). If Mr. Durfee's letter does not constitute a letter of objection, and the Conditions of Approval are acceptable to you, then the application will be placed on the consent portion of the CDB agenda. Thanks! Wayne M. Wells, AICP Planner III City of Clearwater 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, FL 33756 -5520 Phone: 727 - 562 -4504 Fax: 727 - 562 -4865 rin.J1 1:s Cleveland Letter from 0 Staff Report.ove Durfee re 22 MURPH . _AROCCA CONSULTING GRO\ , INC. URBAN PLANNING AND REAL ESTATE CONSULTING March 7, 2008 Mr. Wayne Wells City of Clearwater 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, FL 33756 RECEIVE. RECEIVED MAR 07 2006 Subject: Verizon Office -Case Number: FLD2007 -11035 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER Dear Mr. Wells: We have revised the request for Flexible Development Applications for Residential Infill Project and Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project for the Verizon Utilities Infrastructure building located at 1280 Cleveland Street. Specifically, we are submitting the following: 1) Revised Flexible Development Application (Residential Infill Project) 2) Revised. Responses to Written Submittal Requirements (Residential Infill Project) 3) Revised Flexible Development Application (Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project) 4) Revised Responses to Written Submittal Requirements (Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project Criteria) 5) Revised Written Description 6) Prepared responses to the Requirements for Termination of Status of Nonconformity for Floor Area Ratio and Height per Section 6 -109 of the Community Development Code 6) Revised landscape plan-15 copies 7) Revised Site Plan -15 copies If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact either me (813- 226 -8970) or Mr. James H. Shimberg at (813- 227 - 6412). Thank you for your assistance in this request. Sincerely, Murphy aRocca Consulting Group, Inc. f -, Allen S. Murphy, A CP Attachments as noted BANK OF AMERICA PLAZA 101 E. KENNEDY BOULEVARD, SUITE 3020 TAMPA, FLORIDA 33602 TEL(813)226 -8970 FAX(813)229 -0617 Page 1 of 1 Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2008 1:03 PM To: 'Allen Murphy' Subject: Verizon I need a total of 15 sets (one original and 14 copies) of everything (with the application, I don't need a new original signature on the application and affidavit). - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Allen Murphy [mailto:allen.murphy @murphylarocca.com] Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2008 10:16 AM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: verizon Wayne: I am submitting 20 copies of the revised site plan and 20 copies of the revised landscape plan. How many copies of the applications do you want? Allen Allen S. Murplq Alurphy LaRocca Consulting Group, Inc. .701 East Kennedy Boulevard Sicite 3020 Tampa, FL 33602 Office: (8 13) 226 -8970 Fat: (813) 229 -0 6.17 3/6/2008 Wells, Wayne From: jim.shimberg @hklaw.com Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2008 9:46 AM To: Wells, Wayne Cc: Thompson, Neil; Watkins, Sherry; allen.murphy @murphylarocca.com; pergo @gulfcoastconsultinginc.com; MPatterson @collman- karsky.com Subject: RE: FLD2OO7- 11035, 1280 Cleveland Street Thanks Wayne. I am getting with my team and working to address all of the issues that you have raised within your deadline. Jim - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Wayne.Wells @myClearwater.com ( mailto :Wayne.Wells @myClearwater.com] Sent: Monday, February 25, 2008 6:55 PM To: Shimberg, James H (TPA - X36412) Cc: neil.thompson @MyClearwater.com; Sher .ry.Watkins @myClearwater.com Subject: FLD2007- 11035, 1280 Cleveland Street Jim - The above referenced application has been revised and resubmitted on February 19, 2008. This application has been placed on the March 18, 2008, CDB agenda (see attached letter - original is being mailed). However, after review of the submitted application material, the following material is necessary to be revised and /or resubmitted (these will need to be collated into the application packages we already have in our office): 1. Only Page 1 of the Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project and Residential Infill Project applications have been submitted. Submit 15 copies of the other pages of this application, as submitted previously. We do not need the responses to criteria, as you resubmitted those on February 19, 2008. 2. Submit 14 copies (not the original raised seal version, but copies of such) of the survey (I have the original, signed and raised seal survey for my file). 3. 15 copies of the 8.5" x 11" reduced, colored site plan. 4. There are a number of revisions still necessary to the plans and /or application material prior to the packages being sent to the CDB. See the attached Case Conditions as of 2.25.08. The following Department comments still needing changes are: Engineering #1, Landscape and Zoning. You, and your consultant, may need to have a meeting with me to go over these necessary changes. There was no response to comments submitted with your last submission and it is unclear how some of these comments were addressed (if at all). All of these revisions need to be resubmitted and collated into the CDB application packages no later than noon on Friday, March 7, 2008. While I have placed the application on the CDB agenda, it is imperative that the application package be correct before sending it to the CDB. I will be working on the Staff Report and do not desire to make unnecessary negative comments in the Staff Report based on things not changed /addressed. 1 ie I Wayne M. Wells, AICP Planner III City of Clearwater 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, FL 33756 -5520 Phone: 727 - 562 -4504 Fax: 727 - 562 -4865 <<Cleveland 1280 CDB Letter.doc>> <<case conditions as of .25.08.pdf>> Wells, Wayne s From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Monday, February 25, 2008 6:55 PM To: 'jim.shimberg @hklaw.com' Cc: Thompson, Neil; Watkins, Sherry Subject: FLD2007- 11035, 1280 Cleveland Street Jim - The above referenced application has been revised and resubmitted on February 19, 2008. This application has been placed on the March 18, 2008, CDB agenda (see attached letter - original is being mailed). However, after review of the submitted application material, the following material is necessary to be revised and /or resubmitted (these will need to be collated into the application packages we already have in our office): 1. Only Page 1 of the Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project and Residential Infill Project applications have been submitted. Submit 15 copies of the other pages of this application, as submitted previously. We do not need the responses to criteria, as you resubmitted those on February 19, 2008. 2. Submit 14 copies (not the original raised seal version, but copies of such) of the survey (I have the original, signed and raised seal survey for my file). 3. 15 copies of the 8.5" x 11" reduced, colored site plan. 4. There are a number of revisions still necessary to the plans and /or application material prior to the packages being sent to'the CDB. See the attached Case Conditions as of 2.25.08. The following Department comments still needing changes are: Engineering #1, Landscape and Zoning. You, and your consultant, may need to have a meeting with me to go over these necessary changes. There was no response to comments submitted with your last submission and it is unclear how some of these comments were addressed (if at all). All of these revisions need to be resubmitted and collated into the CDB application packages no later than noon on Friday, March 7, 2008. While I have placed the application on the CDB agenda, it is imperative that the application package be correct before sending it to the CDB. I will be working on the Staff Report and do not desire to make unnecessary negative comments in the Staff Report based on things not changed /addressed. Wayne M. Wells, AICP Planner III City of Clearwater 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, FL 33756 -5520 Phone: 727 - 562 -4504 Fax: 727- 562 -4865 Cleveland case BO CDB Letter.ctions as of 2.25 Conditions Associated With FLD2007- 11035 1280 CLEVELAND ST oil Engineering Condition Steve Doherty 562 -4773 01/28/2008 Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Completion: Not Met 1. 180 -feet of public sidewalk along Cleveland Street is presently located within a 10 -foot wide strip of private property. Public utililites are also located in this portion of property. Applicant shall deed or dedicate to the City of Clearwater a 10 -foot right -of -way easement. At 2/07/08 DRC MEETING REPRESENTATIVE AGREED TO DISCUSS THIS CONDITION WITH PROPERTY OWNER. 2. Applicant shall submit 5 sets of as -built drawings that are signed and sealed by a professional engineer registered in the State of Florida. Construction Services Inspector will field inspect as -built drawings for accuracy. ACKNOWLEDGED General Note: DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. Environmental Condition Sarah Josuns 562 -4897 11/19/2007 A "one story block building" and a "wood frame addition" are shown on the survey in an area Not Met proposed as parking on the site plan. If buildings are to be demolished, an Asbestos Survey and Notification to Pinellas County Air Quality is required prior to demolition. Fire Condition James Keller 562 -4327 x3062 01/31/2008 No Issues Not Met Landsca a Wayne Wells, AICP 727 - 562 -4504 1 /28/2008 2/21/08 & 1/28/08 - WW Not Met Condition of Approval to be included in the Staff Report: That the shrubs along the north side of the existing detached dwelling attain six feet height within Ithree years; 11 /29/2007 2/21/08 - WW Not Met Include as a condition of approval in the Staff Report. 1/28/08 - WW > Sheet 1/1 - Plans are unclear if the front of the northernmost parking space row is provided with vertical curbing. Increase line width if so. 11/29/07 - WW Must provide vertical curb along the front of the parking spaces facing Fredrica Avenue north of the retention pond, the edges of the terminal landscape island north of this row of spaces and / along the front of the northernmost parking space rows. 02/21/2008 ,[ Sheet 1 /1 now indicates the existing dumpster enclosure that is partially within the Betty Lane Not Met right -of -way to be removed, but Sheets L -2 and L -3 do not indicate this dumpster enclosure and other "extra" concrete around it within the right -of -way to be removed and sodded. Revise. Storm Water Condition Phuong Vo 562 -4752 01/30/2008 The following shall be addressed prior to review by the Community Development Board: 1. Provide a grading and drainage plan showing the proposed grades of the new parking lot. 02/07/08 ACKNOWLEGED BY APPLICANT. 2. Provide drainage narrative and calculations addressing the increased impervious area. Per the telephone conversation among the Engineer, Richard Harris, Bob Maran, and Phuong Vo on 1/30/08, the increase impervious area may be addressed by payment in lieu option. 02/07/08 ACKNOWLEGED BY APPLICANT. 3. It appears that the proposed 24'x10' dumpster enclosure is located on top of an existing Not Met CaseConditons Print Date: 02/25/2008 Page 1 of 6 FLD2007 -11035 1280 CLEVELAND ST Storm Water Condition Phuong Vo 562 -4752 stormwater inlet; please relocate the inlet to the west of the proposed dumpster or provide a different location for this dumpster. 02/07/2008 APPLICANT AGREED TO RELOCATE INLET. 4. The existing grate inlet located near the proposed concrete flume to the east shall not be blocked by the proposed curb and wheel stop. 02/07/08 ACKNOWLEGED BY APPLICANT. 5. When the northern portion is being redeveloped, the City will require either an on -site new retention pond with new outfall to a stormwater pipe in Fredrica Drive or an agreement between the two owners allowing the existing pond and private stormwater facilities to be used for the northern portion and allowing for pond maintenance. 02/07/08 ACKNOWLEGED BY APPLICANT. NOTE: If the proposed development of the northerly property necessitates infrastructure modifications to satisfy site - specific stormwater outfall needs the modifications shall be completed by the applicant and at their expense. 02/07/08 ACKNOWLEGED BY APPLICANT. The following shall be addressed prior to the issuance of building permit. 1. All storm pipes and storm structures shall be cleaned and made functional. 02/07/08 ACKNOWLEGED BY APPLICANT. 2. Applicant shall acknowledge in writing that if the northern portion at the later time being redeveloped and has its own storm system and retention pond on site, the owner of the southern portion shall tie the existing storm system into the existing pond. (Currently, the southern portion's storm system ties directly into the City's system) 02/07/08 ACKNOWLEGED BY APPLICANT. 3. The grading plan shall show the complete storm sewer system. 02/07/08 ACKNOWLEGED BY APPLICANT. 4. Provide an approved SWFWMD permit or letter of exemption. 02/07/08 ACKNOWLEGED BY APPLICANT. General notes: 02/07/08 ACKNOWLEGED BY APPLICANT. 1. DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. 2. At building permit application, applicant shall submit all documentation again for review Traffic Eng Condition Bennett Elbo 562 -4775 11/24/2007 The accessible route from handicap parking spaces to a building's accessible entrance shall be Not Met exclusive of the 24' wide drive aisle. (Note: Ramp to the accessible entrance is near the west - property line. Crossing should me moved this direction.) 02/07/08 ACKNOWLEGED BY APPLICANT. 2. Provide an accessible route from a building's accessible entrance to a public sidewalk compliant with Florida Accessibility Code for Building Construction Chapter 11, Section 11- 4.3.2. 02/07/08 ACKNOWLEGED BY APPLICANT. 3. A tall brick enclosure located in the sight - visibility triangle on the soulth side of the property entrance on Fredrica shall be removed. This structure exceeds the 30 -inch height maximum per Community Development Code Section 3 -904. 02/07/08 ACKNOWLEGED BY APPLICANT. The above to be addressed prior to a Community Development Board (CDB) hearing. The following shall be addressed prior to the issuance of building permit. 1. Provide handicapped parking stall and sign details compliant with City standards. http: / /www.myclearwater.com /gov /depts /pwa /engin /Production /stddet/index.asp 02/07/08 ACKNOWLEGED BY APPLICANT. Print Date: 02/25/2008 Page 2 of 6 CaseConditons FLD2007 -11035 1280 CLEVELAND ST Traffic Eng Condition Bennett Elbo 562 -4775 General Note(s): 02/07/08 ACKNOWLEGED BY APPLICANT. 1) Applicant shall comply with the current Transportation Impact Fee Ordinance and fee schedule and paid prior to a Certificate of Occupancy (C.O.). 2) DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. Zon-i Condition Wayne Wells, AICP 727 - 562 -4504 C11 /26/2007 2/21/08 - WW I I d;t; f I' th St ff R rt 11/25/2007 Y 11/26/2007 Y 11/27/2007 4 01/30/20,08 J 11/27/2007 V nc ude as a con i ion o approva in e a epo . 1/30/08 - WW No response to east side of Betty Lane. 11/26/07 - WW Existing overhead utility lines run along the east side of Betty Lane and down the "middle" of the subject property. Section 3 -911 requires the undergrounding of these overhead utility lines. Such undergrounding of these existing overhead utility lines appears feasible. 2/21/08 - WW Revise Page 1 of the application to fill in the Parcel Size (square feet) as 145,135 square feet. 1/30/08 - WW Revise Page 1 of the application to 3.33 acres for Parcel Size (acres) and fill in the Parcel Size (square feet) as 145,135 square feet. 11/25/07 - WW On Page 1 of the application the parcel size is listed as 5.6 acres, yet on the site plan it is listed as 3.21 acres. Which is correct? Not Met Not Met 2/21/08,1/30/08 & 11/26/07 - WW Not Met In lieu of providing building elevations of the existing building, provide color photos of all four sides of the building. 2/21/08, 1/30/08 & 11 /27/07 - WW Not Met On Page 6 of 7 of the application, must complete the following: Acknowledgement of fire flow calculations /water study requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following): Fire Flow Calculations/Water Study is included. Fire Flow Calculations/Water Study is not required. 2/21/08 - WW Not Met Still not correct. 1/30/08 - WW On the north side of the building, there is a handicap ramp that stretches out to the sight visibility triangle on the south side of the southern middle driveway. The plans indicate a handicap path from the hanidcap parking spaces across this southern drive aisle to the building, but would be to the side of an elevated ramp. The accessible path needs to be relocated to access the bottom of the ramp, which is about 20 feet back from the property line at the end of the visibility triangle. Revise. 2/21/08,1/30/08 & 11/27/07 - WW Not Met On Page 6 of 7 of the application, must complete the following: Acknowledgement of traffic impact study requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following): Traffic Impact Study is included. The study must include a summary table of pre- and post - development levels of service for all roadway legs and each turning movement at all intersections identified in the Scoping Meeting. Traffic Impact Study is not required. 11 /27/2007 J 2/21/08 & 1/30/08 - WW Not Met The plan does not indicate screening of the equipment service area by landscaping or a three -foot Print Date: 02/25/2008 Page 3 of 6 CaseConditons FLD2007 -11035 1280 CLEVELAND ST Zoning Condition , Wayne Wells, AICP 727 - 562 -4504 high fence or wall along Betty Lane (see Page 90 of the Downtown Design Guidelines). Prefer cutting back the pavement of the equipment service area a minimum of five feet from the front property line along Betty Lane and installing landscaping for screening to be consistent with rest of property. Revise. 11/27/07 - WW Comply with Downtown Design Guidelines of the Downtown Redevelopment Plan, including the requirement to screen parking from street rights -of -way (see page 84 of the Downtown Redevelopment Plan). 11/27/2007 2 2/21/08,1/30/08 & 11/27/07 - WW Not Met Page 7 of the application, Affidavit to Authorize Agent, need to indicate under Douglas Dale's name his position title in General Telephone Company of Florida (president, secretary, etc.). 12/03/2007 2 2/21/08,1/30/08 & 12/3/07 - WW Not Met On Page 1 of the application the project valuation has been listed as "N /A ". However, there will be a cost associated with constructing the proposed improvements. Recommend inserting a reasonable project valuation. 01 /30/2008 2/21/08 - WW Not Met No explanatory response provided, nor any changes to the plans indicated. 1/30/08 - WW Equipment service area on west side of the building - Unclear why it must be 22.3 feet in width (from Betty Lane property line) and why it must go all the way to Cleveland Street. Cut back to what is necessary or provide justification as to why it must be the proposed dimensions (see other Zoning comment regarding screening of this area). Application Narrative - Provide a description of the equipment service area, including the need for such (any necessary enlightening background information) and how it will function. 2/21/08,1/30/08 & 11/27/07 - WW Not Met The purpose of this request is to be able to sell off the northern portion of the site for other development. As such, the following will be included as a condition of approval: That, prior to the submission for a site development building permit to effect the site changes, a Release of Unity of Title and Minor Lot Adjustment application be submitted to and approved by the Planning Department. 12/02/2007 2/21/08 - WW Not Met Sheet 1/1 now indicates the building to be 86 feet in height. It is really that tall? Additionally, no written material was submitted setting forth the Termination of Status of Nonconformity criteria and responses to such criteria (see criteria below). 12/2/07 - WW Under the East Gateway District of the Downtown Redevelopment Plan, the maximum floor area ratio (FAR) is 0.55 and the maximum height is 50 feet. The proposed FAR exceeds the maximum of 0.55, which is deemed to be nonconforming to that permitted under the Downtown Redevelopment Plan. Additionally, while the actual building height is NOT provided, the application previously noted that the height exceeds the maximum of 50 feet. Provide the existing height. Assumed to be greater than 50 feet in height, which is also nonconforming to that permitted under the Downtown Redevelopment Plan. The application must also request a Termination of Status of Nonconformity for building height (in addition to FAR), under the provisions of Section 6 -109. For the Termination portion of this request, need to provide written responses to the requirements under Section 6- 109.C: a. Perimeter buffers conforming to the requirements of section 3- 1202(C) shall be installed. b. Off - street parking lots shall be improved to meet the landscaping standards established in section 3- 1202(D). c. Any nonconforming sign, outdoor lighting or other accessory structure or accessory use located Print Date: 02/25/2008 Page 4 of 6 CaseConditons FLD2007 -11035 1280 CLEVELAND ST Zoning Condition Wayne Wells, AICP 727 - 562 -4504 on the lot shall be terminated, removed or brought into conformity with this development code. d. The comprehensive landscaping and comprehensive sign programs may be used to satisfy the requirements of this section. 01/31/20138 J 2/21/08 - WW Not Met Sheet 1/1 indicates this "brick enclosure to be removed or lowered to 30" in height ", which is fine, but, if it is to be removed, Sheet L -2 does not indicate any replacement landscaping to shield the parking. Could you make a choice or, at least, put some language on Sheet L -2 regarding the installation of "x" number of "what type" of shrubs in the event the wall is removed? 1/31/08 - WW There is an "L or U" shaped wall approximately six feet tall within the sight visibility triangle at the parking area off Fredrica Avenue. This wall is within the visibility triangle and should either be cut down in height to a maximum of 36- inches or removed and replaced with landscaping to screen the parking area. Note: Fredrica Avenue will soon be changed to a two -way street (not one -way as present). 02/05/2008 J 2/21/08 - WW Not Met The submitted Written Description (Revised) but still dated Dec. 20, 2007, still includes a statement that only 8% interior landscaping is being provided, yet Sheet 1/1 indicates 14.3% is being provided. Which is correct, the Written Description or Sheet 1/1? Revise the incorrect statement. 2/5/08 - WW Written Description (Revised) - Residential Infill Project Application - Page 1 - In conjuction with other Landscaping comments, unclear if minimum 10% interior landscaping is being provided or not ( ? ?). The interior landscaping is a function of the vehicular use area, irrespective of the zoning of the parking lot. 02/05/2008 f 2/21/08 - WW Not Met The response relates more to the Comprehensive Infill portion of this request in the Downtown District rather than the "nonresidential off - street parking" in the MHDR District. Revise response to address the parking lot in the MHDR District portion of this request. 2/5/08 - WW Response to Residential Infill Project Criteria #1 - Need to include in the response how this existing /proposed parking lot in the MHDR District cannot be constructed without the deviations listed in the request (see above, written by staff). 02/05/2008 J 2/21/08 - WW Not Met The response relates more to the Comprehensive Infill portion of this request in the Downtown District rather than the "nonresidential off - street parking" in the MHDR District. Revise response to address the parking lot in the MHDR District portion of this request in light of the comments below. 2/5/08 - WW Response to Residential Infill Project Criteria #2 - Response should include how site and landscaping improvements could improve property values of abutting properties. I am not aware of any additional drainage facilities being constructed as part of this application for the parking lot in the MHDR District (last sentence). 02/05/2008 J 2/21/08 - WW Not Met a. Sheet 1/1 indicates a four -foot high solid fence along the north proposed property line. This conflicts with Sheet L -2, which indicates a six -foot high solid pvc vinyl fence, reduced to three feet high within the front setbacks. What height of fence is proposed? Statement for such should be consistent on both Sheets 1/1 and L -1. Revise. b. Neither Sheet 1/1 or Sheet L -2 indicates a minimum four -foot high solid fence along the south property line adjacent to the north side of the detached dwelling on Fredrica Avenue. Revise. c. The Residential Infill Project Application Written Description does not provide any statements regarding the Code requirement for the location of landscaping in relation to this fence and does Print Date: 02/25/2008 Page 5 of 6 CaseConditons FLD2007 -11035 1280 CLEVELAND ST Zoning Condition Wayne Wells, AICP 727 - 562 -4504 not request a deviation to this requirement to allow the landscaping on the inside of the fence (rather than the outside of the fence). Revise written material. 2/5/08 - WW Criteria #3 for Nonresidential Off - Street Parking in the MHDR District requires a solid fence or wall along the proposed north property line and along the south property line adjacent to the detached dwelling outparcel (22 Fredrica Avenue) a minimum of four feet in height (must be reduced to three feet in height within the front setback along Betty Lane and Fredrica Avenue. Indicate compliance on the plans. This same section requires the landscaping to be placed on the outside of the fence /wall, which I strongly recommend requesting the landscaping be placed on the inside of the fence /wall as a deviation to this criteria (staff will support such. deviation). 02/05/2008 2/21/08 & 2/5/08 - WW Sheet 1/1 - Revise Land Use Summary for Setbacks (MHDR District) for Side - Proposed to Parking from "5 feet (N & E)" to "5 feet (N & S) ". Not Met CaseConditons Print Date: 02/25/2008 Page 6 of 6 CITY OF CLEARWATER POST OFFICE Box 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758 -4748 ;` MUNICIPAL. SERVICES BUILDING, LOO SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562 -4567 FAX (727) 562 -4865 PLANNING DEPARTMENT February 25, 2008 James Shimberg Holland & Knight 100 N. Tampa Street, Suite 4100 Tampa, FL 33602 -3644 Re: Community Development Board Meeting (Case No. FLD2007- 11035) Dear Mr. Shimberg: You have filed Case No. FLD2007 -11035 for property located at 1280 Cleveland Street for Flexible Development approval (1) for the Termination of Status of Nonconformity for Floor Area Ratio [FAR] (1.27 FAR proposed; where 0.55 FAR permitted today) and for building height (86 feet existing; where 50 -foot height permitted today) in the Downtown District (East Gateway Character District), under the provisions of Section 6 -109; (2) to permit the improvement of the existing site and parking areas for a "utilities /infrastructure facility" use in the Downtown District, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2- 903.C; and (3) to permit Nonresidential Off - Street Parking in the Medium High Density Residential (MHDR) District with deviations to reduce the side (north) setback from 10 to five feet (to pavement) and to allow the placement of landscaping on the inside of the buffer fence /wall along the north and south sides of the property, as a Residential Infill Project, under the provisions of Section 2- 4041. This case has been scheduled to be reviewed by the Community Development Board on March 18, 2008. The meeting will take place at 1:00 p.m. in the City Council Chambers, 3rd floor of City Hall at 112 S. Osceola Avenue, Clearwater. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call me at 727 -562 -4504. Sincerely, WaynIhL Wells, AICP Planner III S: IPlanning DeparhnentlC D BIFLEX (FLD) (Pending casesl Up for the next CDB(Cleveland 1280 Verizon Office (D and MHDR) - 3.18.08 CDB - WWI Cleveland 1280 CDB Letter. doc "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER" MURPt LAROCCA CONSULTING GRC. A, INC. URBAN PLANNING AND REAL ESTATE CONSULTING February 19, 2007 Mr. Wayne Wells City of Clearwater - 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, FL 33756 Subject: Verizon Office -Case Number: FLD2007 -11035 Dear Mr. Wells: Based on our DRC meeting on February 7, 2008, we have revised the request for Flexible Development Applications for Residential Infill Project and Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project for the Verizon Utilities Infrastructure building located at 1280 Cleveland Street. Specifically, we are submitting the following: 1) Revised Flexible Development Application (Residential Infill Project) 2) Revised Flexible Development Application (Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project) 3) Revised Responses to Written Submittal Requirements (Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project Criteria) 3) Revised Written Description 4) Revised landscape plan-15 copies 5) Revised Site Plan-15 copies If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact either me (813- 226 -8970) or Mr. James H. Shimberg at (813- 227 - 6412). Thank you for your assistance in this request. Sincerely, , Attachments as noted BANK OF AMERICA PLAZA 10 1 E. KENNEDY BOULEVARD, SUITE 3020 TAMPA, FLORIDA 33602 TEL(813)226 -8970 FAX(813)229 -0617 ORIGINAL REM FED 2000 1 LMMIG D5 RAE14 T CITY OF CLVIMXER Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2008 6:20 PM To: 'Allen Murphy' Subject: Verizon application Allen - I have reviewed the attached revised responses and offer the following comments: 1. General Applicability criteria #1 - Second paragraph, second line - remove "with consistent" as it is unnecessary. Page 1 of 2 2. Residential Infill Project criteria #1 - This portion of the application is related to the nonresidential parking within the MHDR District. Need to address this use and the requested deviations in relation to the criteria, not the utilities /infrastructure facility building and its nonconformities (and Termination). The nonresidential parking within the MHDR District is meeting required setbacks, but deviations are necessary to the criteria (see request as written on the top of the Draft DRC action agenda). 3. Residential Infill Project. criteria #2 - This portion of the application is related to the nonresidential parking within the MHDR District. Need to address this use and the requested deviations in relation to the criteria, not the utilities /infrastructure facility building and its nonconformities (and Termination). 4. Residential Infill Project criteria #3 - The "Nonresidential Off - Street Parking" use is listed as a Flexible Development use in the MHDR District. 5. Residential Infill Project criteria #4 - You may want to discuss, as part of the compatibility discussion, that this nonresidential off - street parking currently exists, but is being improved as part of this proposal. Discussion may want to discuss its improved compatibility due to the proposed improvements. 6. Residential Infill Project criteria #5 - You may also want to discuss compliance with required setbacks in relation to improved landscaping and how this relates to the surrounding neighborhood. 7. Residential Infill Project criteria #6 and #7- Similar comments as above relating to criteria #5. 8. Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria #2 - Need to look at the Downtown Redevelopment Plan for goals and policies that relate to this proposal and address how this proposal is consistent with these goals and policies.. Additionally, last sentence is addressing a "residential infill project" (which this is not) and is addressing market value, which this criteria is not asking you to address. 9. Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria #3 - First sentence - This is not a "Residential Infill Project ". Also look at East Gateway District for policies related to the provision of new housing when discussing this criteria. Need to address how the proposed parking and landscaping improvements will improve this site's appearance, which could lead to increase redevelopment potential for the surrounding area (beyond the northern portion you want to sell off). 10. Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria #5 - You might want to state how long this use has been at this location (relating to compatibility and the use characteristics of the neighborhood). 11. Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria #6 - Need to better address a =e. Should discuss the purpose of the Termination portion of the request is because the existing FAR and height exceed that which has been adopted as part of the East Gateway District and that the existing building is to be retained in its existing built condition, which does not comply with the standards for new buildings (see d). 2/14/2008 Page 2 of 2 12. Termination of Status of Nonconformity criteria of Section 6 -109.0 - Need to provide appropriate responses. Wayne - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Allen Murphy [ mailto: allen.murphy @murphylarocca.com] Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2008 3:00 PM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: Verizon application Wayne: Attached are the edits to the Verizon application responses per your DRC review. Thanks for looking them over before we submit next week. Allen Allen S. JVurpliy Murphy LaRocca Consulting Group, Inc. 101 Fast Ac -"tzfaedy Boulevard Suite 3020 Tampa, FL 33002 Of/ice: (813) 226 -8970 F, ax: (8.13) 229-067.7 2/14/2008 11 A' Date: 2/14/08 Responses to Revised Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project Application, General Applicability Criteria (Code Section 3- 913.A) 1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. The subject of this application is a 3.3 acre parcel (Verizon Site) that will be created to allow the sale of unused property to its north. This application proposes no new development. Approval of this application request will allow the sale of unused property to the north for other development consistent with consistent with the CBD Plan designation and medium high density residential (MHDR) zoning. The remaining property, Verizon Site, is the subject of this application and will remain in its current Utilities /Infrastructure Facility use. The existing Utilities /Infrastructure Facility building is non - conforming to the Downtown Redevelopment Plan East Gateway District standard for F.A.R. and height. The maximum F.A.R. allowed in this district is .40 and the maximum height allowed is 50 feet. Therefore, as part of this application, a request for Termination of Status of Nonconformity for Floor Area Ratio and Height is included. It should be noted that the original building was put into service in 1954 with several additions to the original buildings in 1967, 1970 and 1974 all of which predates the Downtown Redevelopment Plan East Gateway District requirements. In addition, the revised site plan will provide for improvements to the Verizon Site such as removing parking from the right of way; providing additional landscaping and buffering; improving handicap access to the existing building; relocating dumpsters away from Betty Lane; providing new driveways that comply with code; and removing an existing one story building to provide a more efficient parking area. The existing Utilities /Infrastructure Facility building is non - conforming to the Downtown Redevelopment Plan East Gateway District standard for F.A.R. and height. As such,. a deviation through the Termination of Status of Nonconformity is needed to recognize the existing F.A.R. and height and to allow the sale of the unused northern portion of the property for residential development consistent with the MHDR designation. 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. This application will allow for potential development of adjacent land which will likely increase property values in the area. The proposed site plan removes parking from the right of way and will provide additional landscaping. 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety or persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use. As stated in #1 above, the revised site plan will provide for improvements to the Verizon Site such as removing parking from the right of way; providing additional landscaping and buffering; relocating dumpsters away from Betty Lane; providing new driveways that comply with code; and removing an existing one story building to provide a more efficient parking area. In addition, the new parking layout will reduce pedestrian/vehicle conflicts by repairing sidewalks and providing improved handicap access to the existing building. I ! , f 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. No building area is being added therefore there is no change in the existing site traffic generation. The existing driveways will be realigned to improve vehicular access while providing better access for the Fire Department; parking in the right of way will be removed; and pedestrian and handicapped access will be improved. S. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. The existing building is nonconforming to the Downtown Redevelopment Plan East Gateway District standards for F.A.R. and height and a request for Termination of Status of Nonconformity is included with this application. The Verizon site occupies the southern portion of the block and generally abuts other commercial and non - residential uses on the west, south and east sides of the property. The proposed site plan is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity by providing for buffering that currently does not exist adjacent to the vacant residential zoned property to the north and existing residential use to the east; and, as stated in 4 above, traffic congestion and conflict will be improved by removing parking in the right of way and improving pedestrian circulation. 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts, on adjacent properties. As stated in the above responses, the new site plan provides for additional landscaping and buffering; relocates entries that meet code requirements for vehicular as well as emergency vehicles; removes unsafe parking spaces; and provides improved pedestrian and handicap access —all of which will minimize any adverse effects of the existing building and use on adjacent properties. Revised Responses to Written Submittal Requirements (Residential Inlill Project Criteria) 1. The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development is otherwise impractical without deviations from the intensity and development standards. The existing Utilities /Infrastructure Facility building is non - conforming to the Downtown Redevelopment Plan East Gateway District standard for F.A.R. and height. As such, a deviation through the Termination of Status of Nonconformity is needed to recognize the existing F.A.R. and height and to allow the sale of the unused northern portion of the property for residential development consistent with the MHDR designation. 2. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a residential infill project will not materially reduce the fair market value of abutting properties. The existing Utilities /Infrastructure Facility building is non - conforming to the Downtown Redevelopment Plan East Gateway District standard for F.A.R. and height. As such, a deviation through the Termination of Status of Nonconformity is needed to recognize the existing F.A.R. and height and to allow the sale of the unused northern portion of the property for residential development consistent with the MHDR designation. By allowing the existing project to remain along with improvements to the parking, buffering, landscaping, vehicular access, and pedestrian on the existing Verizon property, the residential infill project will not materially reduce the fair market value on abutting properties. 3. The uses within the residential infill project are otherwise permitted in the City of Clearwater. The property currently contains existing parking spaces and multiple driveway entries. The proposed parking can be reviewed and approved via the Flexible Development Application. 4. The uses or mix of use within the residential infill project are compatible with adjacent land uses. The parking spaces in the MHDR portion of the subject property will be part of a new parking lot to accommodate the existing utility facility. 5. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a residential infill project will upgrade the. immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. The property currently contains existing parking spaces and multiple driveway entries. The redesigned parking lot will provide increased radii for the driveways into the property to accommodate fire service vehicles; new landscaping that will comply with code; reduced impervious surface; and elimination of parking spaces that back into public right of way and/r impede fire exits. 6. The design of the proposed residential infill project creates a form and function that enhances the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. As stated above, the property currently contains existing parking spaces and multiple driveway entries. The redesigned parking lot will provide increased radii for the driveways into the property to accommodate fire service vehicles as well as landscaping that will comply with code. 7. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height and off - street parking are justified by the benefits to community character and the immediate vicinity of the parcels proposed for development and City of Clearwater as a whole. As stated above, the property currently contains existing parking spaces and multiple driveway entries. The redesigned parking lot will provide increased radii for the driveways into the property to accommodate fire service vehicles as well as landscaping that will comply with code. 1. The development or redevelopment is otherwise impractical without deviations from the use and/or development standards set forth in this zoning district. The existing Utilities /Infrastructure Facility building is non - conforming to the Downtown Redevelopment Plan East Gateway District standard for F.A.R. and height. As such, a deviation through the Termination of Status of Nonconformity is needed to recognize the existing F.A.R. and height and to allow the sale of the unused northern portion of the property for residential development consistent with the MHDR designation. The portion of the subject property that is within the D zoning district currently contains an existing Utilities /Infrastructure Facility building and existing parking spaces. The Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project Application will essentially recognize an existing building; provide a new parking layout; address other public facility concerns; and allow the sale of an unused portion of the property to the north. 2. The development or redevelopment will be consistent with the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan, as well as with the general purpose, intent and basic planning objectives of this Code, and with the intent and purpose of this zoning district. This application proposes no additions to the existing Utilities /Infrastructure Facility building. However, this building is non - conforming to the Downtown Redevelopment Plan East Gateway District standard for F.A.R. and height. As such, a deviation through the Termination of Status of Nonconformity is needed to recognize the existing F.A.R. and height and to allow the sale of the unused northern portion of the property for residential development consistent with the MHDR designation. By allowing the existing project to remain along with improvements to the parking, buffering, landscaping, vehicular access, and pedestrian on the existing Verizon property, the residential infill project will not materially reduce the fair market value on abutting properties. 3. The development or redevelopment will not impede the normal and orderly development of surrounding properties. Approval of the application for a Residential Infill Project will allow the sale of the underutilized northern portion of the property to be resold for new residential development as well as improvements to the existing Verizon property described above. This potential new residential development will provide for a better transition of uses from the existing Utilities /Infrastructure Facility property to the existing residential area to the north. 4. Adjoining properties will not suffer substantial detriment as a result of the proposed development. Adjoining properties will not suffer substantial detriment because this application will allow for potential development of adjacent land which will likely increase property values in the area. The proposed site plan removes parking from the right of way and will provide additional landscaping. 5. The proposed use shall otherwise be permitted by the underlying future land use category, be compatible with adjacent land uses, will not substantially alter the essential use characteristics of the neighborhood; and shall demonstrate compliance with one or more of the following objectives: a. The proposed use is permitted in this zoning district as a minimum standard, flexible standard or flexible development use; b. The proposed use would be a significant economic contributor to the City's economic base by diversifying the local economy or by creating jobs; C. The development proposal accommodates the expansion or redevelopment of an existing economic contributor; d. The proposed use provides for the provision of affordable housing; e. The proposed use provides for development or redevelopment in an area that is characterized by other similar development and where a land use plan amendment and rezoning would result in a spot land use or zoning designation; or f. The proposed use provides for the development of a new and/or preservation of a working waterfront use. The existing Utilities /Infrastructure Facility is listed in the Downtown District as a Level 1, Flexible Standard Development (FLS) use. This application will recognize the existing Utilities /Infrastructure Facility in its present size and height in order to allow for the sale of the unused northern portion of the property for residential development. The improvements to the existing use parking area, landscaping, access, pedestrian circulation, etc. represents a redevelopment of the existing economic contributor and the residential northern portion of the property provides redevelopment of a potential economic contributor. 6. Flexibility with regard to use, lot width, required setbacks, height and off - street parking are justified based on demonstrated compliance with all of the following design objectives: a. The proposed development will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of the surrounding properties for uses permitted in this zoning district; b. The proposed development complies with applicable design guidelines adopted by the City; C. The design, scale and intensity of the proposed development supports the established or emerging character of an area; d. In order to form a cohesive, visually interesting and attractive appearance, the proposed development incorporates a substantial number of the following design elements: • Changes in horizontal building planes; • Use of architectural details such as columns, cornices, stringcourses, pilasters, porticos, balconies, railings, awnings, etc.; • Variety in materials, colors and textures; • Distinctive fenestration patterns; • Building stepbacks; and • Distinctive roofs forms. e. The proposed development provides for appropriate buffers, enhanced landscape design and appropriate distances between buildings. Approval of this application request will allow the sale of unused property to the north for other development consistent with consistent with the CBD Plan designation and medium high density residential (MHDR) zoning. The remaining property is the subject of this application and will remain in its current Utilities /Infrastructure Facility use. The revised site plan will provide for improvements to the existing Utilities /Infrastructure Facility site, such as removing parking from the right of way; providing additional landscaping and buffering; improving handicap access to the existing building; relocating dumpsters away from Betty Lane; providing new driveways that comply with code; and removing an existing one story building to provide a more efficient parking area. j P In addition, the new parking layout will reduce pedestrian/vehicle conflicts by repairing sidewalks and providing improved handicap access to the existing building. The property currently contains existing parking spaces and multiple driveway entries. The redesigned parking lot will provide increased radii for the driveways into the property to accommodate fire service vehicles; new landscaping that will comply with code; reduced impervious surface; and elimination of parking spaces that back into public right of way and/or impede fire exits. Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2008 4:20 PM To: 'jim.shimberg @hklaw.com' Subject: FLD2007- 11035, 1280 Cleveland Street Jim - Attached are the Draft February 7, 2008, DRC comments for the above referenced application. The meeting will be held in the Planning Department offices at 1:00 pm (100 S. Myrtle Avenue, Clearwater, FL). Should you have any questions, feel free to email or call me (727- 562 - 4504). Wayne M. Wells, AICP Planner III City of Clearwater 100 South Myrtle Avenue` Clearwater, FL 33756 -5520 Phone: 727 - 562 -4504 Fax: 727 - 562 -4865 draft 2.7.08 c action agenda Page 1 of 2 Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2008 4:45 PM To: 'Terri Vertes' Cc: 'Allen Murphy'; Watkins, Sherry; Thompson, Neil Subject: Verizon Flexible Development - FLD2007 -11035 Terri - The Development Review Committee (DRC) meeting will occur on February 7th. The time of such meeting for this case has not been scheduled yet. We won't set the time of the meeting until late Thursday, January 31 st or on Friday, February 1 st. We will call the applicant of such meeting time once it is determined. The applicant should also receive draft DRC comments on Monday, February 4th. If the application is found by the DRC to be sufficient to move forward to the Community Development Board (CDB), you will be told at the DRC meeting. If sufficient, 15 new sets /packages of ALL application materials, revised to comply with the DRC comments, will need to be submitted to us no later than noon on February 19th. We (all DRC members) will review the resubmittal and let me know that you have complied with their comments, that you have not complied with their comments and your case cannot move forward (would need to be something severe) or that you have primarily complied with their comments and can move forward with conditions of approval. If everything is okay, we place your application on the CDB agenda for March 18th. I will notify you of such placement on the CDB agenda. Alternately, I may require additional revisions to the application material, to be submitted by a certain date, so that the application is more compliant (ie: requiring less or no negative comments in the staff report or less conditions of approval). Once the application is placed on the CDB agenda, then I will produce a staff report. This staff report must be sent to you no later than March 13th. I hope this answers your questions. Thanks. Wayne - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Terri Vertes [ mailto :terri.vertes @murphylarocca.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2008 2:54 PM To: Wells, Wayne Cc: 'Allen Murphy' Subject: Verizon Flexible Development - FLD2007 -11035 Importance: High Wayne, We were given a DRC meeting date for the Verizon Flexible Development Application (FLD2007- 11035) February 7th, but were not given the time or any correspondence related to the meeting. Can you confirm the meeting time for me? Also, is there a deadline for the Staff Report? Thank you. Terri A. Vertes Murphy LaRocca Consulting Group, Inc. 101 East Kennedy Boulevard Suite 3020 Tampa, FL 33602 Office: 813 - 226 -8970 1/23/2008 Development & Neighborhood Services Department 100 S. Myrtle Avenue, Suite 210 Clearwater, FL 33756 Telephone: (727) 562 -4567 Fax: (727) 562 -4576 www.myclearwater.com RESPONSE TO COMMENTS /PLAN AMENDMENT APPLICATION (PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY) S;1�1 += I---b 2b o n -\ I o a S ber: Project Address: k V,�0 0<fVeb fic l 3 -t e c ,A- Permit has been issued. (Plan Amendment) Permit has not been issued. (Response to Comments) Detailed description of changes: -1 �`� C ev ®RIGIt -AX RED: 312007 PLANNING DWRRTMEN r CITY DF CI.M. WATER Date Remived/Office Use Only \, eoAi cin 5-e )N -' -tom V J f '`1 See attached cover letter for details. Any Change in Job Valuation: $ Office use only /Label Here Contact person for this project: - N �fkl M UY-01 �I Please Print I Contact Phone: $13 2_ Z Lo %01-10 Signature Contact Fax: Building div/fonrsBapPlication12006 /MAL MURPH December 27, 2007 ..AROCCA CONSULTING GRO, INC. URBAN PLANNING AND REAL ESTATE CONSUL TING Mr. Wayne Wells City of Clearwater Planning Department 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, FL 33756 Subiect: Case Number FLD2007 -11035 (1280 Cleveland Street) Dear Mr. Wells: Based on our DRC meeting held on December 6, 2007, we have revised the request for Flexible Development Applications for Residential Infill Project and Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project for the Verizon Utilities Infrastructure building located at 1280 Cleveland Street. Specifically, we are submitting the following: 1. Revised Flexible Development Application (Residential Infill Project) 2. Revised Flexible Development Application (Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project) 3. Revised Written Description 4. Revised survey to accurately reflect the easements and property boundaries 20 copies 5. Revised landscape plan 20 copies 6. Revised site plan 20 copies If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact either me (813- 226 -8970) or Mr. James H. Shimberg at (813- 227 - 6412). Thank you for your assistance in this request. Sincerely, Mu by LaRoc a Consulting Group, Inc. Allen S. Murphy BANK OF AMERICA PLAZA 10 1 E. KENNEDY BOULEVARD, SUITE 3020 TAMPA, FLORIDA 33602 TEL(813)226 -8970 FAX(813)229 -0617 MO RECIM DEC 3 12007 PLAMING D TfA C EN ITY CLEW "vez Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Monday, December 03, 2007 7:28 PM To: 'jim.shimberg @hklaw.com' Subject: FLD2007- 11035, 1280 Cleveland Street 1� Attached are the Draft December 6, 2007, DRC comments for the above referenced application. The meeting will be held in the Planning Department offices at 1:05 pm (100 S. Myrtle Avenue, Clearwater, FL). The purpose of the meeting is to ensure you understand the DRC comments so that you know how to revise the application material appropriately. The purpose of the meeting is not go over each and every comment (some comments are easily understood). Should you have any questions, feel free to email or call me (727- 562 - 4504). Wayne draft 12.6.07 rc action agend. 'I CITYYOF C LEARtXATER POST OFFICE BOX 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758 -4748 MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 X TELEPHONE (727) 562 -4567 FAX (727) 562 -4865 vrr PLANNING DEPARTMENT November 13, 2007 VIA FAX: (813) 314 -5108 Mr. James Shimberg Holland & Knight 100 N. Tampa Street, Suite 4100 Tampa, Florida 33602 -3644 Re: FLD2007 -11035 —1280 Cleveland Street — Letter of Completeness Dear Mr. Shimberg: The Planning Department staff has entered your application into the Department's filing system and assigned the case number FLD2007- 11035. After a preliminary review of the submitted documents, staff.has determined that the application is complete. The Development Review Committee (DRC) will review the application for sufficiency on Thursday, December 6, 2007, in the Planning Department Conference Room (Room 216), which is located on the second floor of the Municipal Services Building at 100 South Myrtle Avenue. You will be contacted by the Planning Department's Administrative Analyst within one week prior to the meeting date for the approximate time that your case will be reviewed. You or your representative (as applicable) must be present to answer any questions that the DRC may have regarding your application. Additional comments may be generated by the DRC at the time of the meeting. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at 727 -562 -4504 or wayne.wells c�myclearwater.com. Sincerely yours, Wayne Wells, AICP Planner III FRANK HIBBARD, MAYOR JOHN KORAN, COUNCILMEMBER J.B. JOHNSON, COUNCILMEMBER BILL. JONSON, COUNCILMEMBER Alm CAREEN A. PETERSEN, COUNCILMEMBER "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER" AFC nCDri .' PLANNING DEPARTMENT November 5, 2007 Mr. James Shimberg Holland & Knight 100 N. Tampa Street, Suite 4100 Tampa, Florida 33602 -3644 CITY OF CLEARWATER POST OFFICE BOX 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758 -4748 MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAx (727) 562 -4865 Re: FLD2007 -11035 —1280 Cleveland Street — Letter of Incompleteness Dear Mr. Shimberg: VIA FAX: (813) 314 -5108 The Planning Department staff has entered your application into the Department's filing system and assigned the case number FLD2007- 11035. After a preliminary review of the submitted documents, staff has determined that the application is incomplete with the following comments: 1. A signed and sealed survey is required to be submitted as part of the application (14 copies are also required). 2. Pursuant to Section G of the application, the following items must be incorporated on the site plan: - all required setbacks; - all required sight triangles; and - building and structural setbacks (dimensioned). 3. Pursuant to Section H of the application, a landscape plan is required to be provided as a part of this application. Submit landscape plans consistent with the requirements of this section. Pursuant to Section 4 -202 of the Community Development Code, if an application is deemed incomplete, the deficiencies of the application shall be specified by Staff and no further development review action shall be taken until those specified deficiencies are corrected and the application is deemed complete. Please resubmit revised plans and application materials as per the above comments no later than Noon, Tuesday, November 13, 2007. Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at 727 -562 -4504 or Wayne.Wells@myclearwater.com. Sincerely yours, Wayne Wells Planner III FRANK HIBBARD, MAYOR JOHN DORAN, COUNCILMEMBER J.B. JOHNSON, COUNCILMEMBER BILL JONSON, COUNCILMEMBER CARLEN A. PETERSEN, COUNCILMEMBER MY "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER" CITY OF CLEARWATER LL PLANNING DEPARTMENT ° } Clearwater 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE ~_ CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 U TEL: (727) 562 -4567 FAx: (727) 562 -4865 Date: To: From: Re: Comments: FACSIMILE COVER SHEET November 5, 2007 James Shimberg, Holland & Knight, (813) 314 -5108 Robert G. Tefft, Planner III FLD2007 -11035 11280 Cleveland Street Number of Pages Including Cover Sheet: 2 ** Please confirm receipt via e-mail at: robert.tefft a nayclearwater.com ** ** Visit the Planning Department online at www.myclearwater.com ** Gulf Coast Consulting, Inc. Land Development Consulting • Engineering • Planning • Transportation • Permitting ICOT Center ti 13825 ICOT Boulevard, Suite 605 Clearwater, FL 33760 Phone: (727) 524 -1818 Fax: (727) 524 -6090 July 27, 2007 Mr. Wayne Wells, AICP, Senior Planner City of Clearwater Planning Department 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, FL 33756 Re: Verizon Office @ 1280 Cleveland Street Parking Analysis Dear Mr. Wells: Per our discussion we are submitting this proposed methodology for the Parking Analysis for the existing Verizon Office building parking lot reduction. As you know Verizon seeks to sell excess land on the northern end of the property and consolidate the parking field on the southern portion of the property to contain 188 spaces. This will require a Flexible Development Application with a Parking Demand Study. The existing parking lot contains parking spaces scattered throughout the site, many unused. According to the Community Development Code the existing 185,194 s.f. office /warehouse would require 556 spaces (3 per 1,000 s.f.).With the proposed reconfigured site the parking supply will be reduced to 188 spaces (1 per 1,000 s.f.). It is believed the existing office generates a low parking demand, such that ample spaces exist to accommodate existing office building. The building is houses 141 employees, and much of the space is devoted to switching equipment, and non - office space. This is not a call center or a 24 -hour operation. Gulf Coast Consulting, Inc. (GCC) will conduct hourly parking observations on a weekday between 7 AM and 7 PM. Parking accumulation will be noted and a written report prepared demonstrating occupied and available spaces. A Parking Analysis report will be submitted with the Flexible Development Application. Please contact me if you have any questions regarding this methodology. Si ly, Robert Pergoli i, P Principal Cc: Allen Murphy, Murphy LaRocca Jim Shimburg, Holland & Knight Mike Lewis, Verizon 07 -053 RECENED JUL 31 2007 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER Page 1 of 1 Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2007 10:35 AM To: 'Lorraine Lyn' Subject: RE: GTE property Lorraine - The requirement is three spaces per 1,000 sf. At a Staff level request (Flexible Standard - FLS) or a public hearing level request (Flexible Development - FLD), parking can range as low as one space per 1,000 sf. Parking provided at less than three spaces per 1,000 sf will require the submission of a Parking Demand Study to justify the reduction desired. A scoping meeting with the Planning Department and Traffic Engineering Departments is required prior to conducting the Parking Demand Study. Wayne - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Lorraine Lyn [mailto:lyn @murphylarocca.com] Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2007 10:28 AM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: FW: GTE property Hi Wayne, Thanks for your help ysterday on the property at Betty and Drew. Would the parking requirements in D zoning for offices be one per 1,000 sq. ft. of office? Thanks, Lorraine Lyn Murphy LaRocca Consulting Group, Inc. Ph: 813 - 221 -7813 1/9/2008 9 CDB Meeting Date: March 18, 2008 Case Numbers: FLD2007 -11035 Agenda Item: G2 Owners: GTE Florida, Inc. and General Telephone Company of Florida Applicant: Doug Dale, Verizon Corporate Real Estate Representative: James Shimberg, Holland & Knight Address: 1280 Cleveland Street CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT GENERAL INFORMATION: REQUEST: Flexible Development approval (1) for the Termination of Status of Nonconformity for Floor Area Ratio [FAR] (1.27 FAR existing /proposed; where 0.55 FAR permitted today) and for building height (86 feet existing; where 50 -foot height permitted today) in the Downtown District (East Gateway Character District), under the provisions of Section 6 -109; (2) to permit the improvement of the existing site and parking areas for a "utilities /infrastructure facility" use in the Downtown District, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2- 903.C; and (3) to permit Nonresidential Off - Street Parking in the Medium High Density Residential (MHDR) District with deviations to reduce the side (north) setback from 10 to five feet (to pavement) and to allow the placement of landscaping on the inside of the buffer fence /wall along the north and south sides of the property, as a Residential Infill Project, under the provisions of Section 2- 404.F. CURRENT ZONING: Downtown (D) District and Medium High Density Residential (MHDR) District CURRENT FUTURE LAND Central Business District (CBD) and Residential High (RH) USE CATEGORY: DOWNTOWN CHARACTER DISTRICT: PROPERTY USE: East Gateway Character District Current Use: Utility /Infrastructure Facility Proposed Use:. Utility /Infrastructure Facility Community Development Board — March 18,. 2008 FLD2007- 11035, —Page 1 of 12 EXISTING SURROUNDING ZONING AND USES: ANAT.VCTC- North: Medium High Density Residential (MHDR) District South: Downtown (D) District East: Medium High Density Residential (MHDR) District and Commercial (C) District West: Downtown (D) District and Medium High Density Residential (MHDR) District Parking lot Overnight accommodations and Utility /infrastructure facility Automobile service station, Parking lot and Detached dwellings Overnight Accommodations, Attached dwellings and Detached dwellings Site Location and Existing Conditions: The 3.33 acres is located on the north side of Cleveland Street between N. Betty, Lane and N. Fredrica Avenue. The property has been developed with the utility /infrastructure facility for some time, as well as the accessory parking lot on the north side of the building. The buildings and a portion of the accessory parking lot is zoned Downtown (D) District, while the majority of the accessory parking lot to the north of the main building is zoned Medium High Density Residential'(MHDR) District. It is the owners' desire to split off the northern portion of the parking lot that is no longer needed and sell it for residential development. . The properties to the south across Cleveland Street are zoned Downtown District and are developed with an overnight accommodation use and a utility /infrastructure facility. The properties directly east of the subject property across Fredrica Avenue are currently developed with an automobile service station and parking lot zoned Commercial District (approved by the CDB on January 15, 2008, under FLD2007- 09029 to be redeveloped with a new building with retail sales and services on the ground floor and offices on the second floor) and detached' dwellings zoned Medium High Density Residential District north of the existing parking lot. The properties directly west of the subject property across N. Betty Lane are currently developed with - an overnight accommodation use zoned Downtown District and attached and detached dwellings zoned Medium High Density Residential District. Development Proposal: The impetus for this proposal is the owners' desire to split off the northern portion of the parking lot that is no longer needed and sell it for residential development. The land area to be retained for the Verizon utility/infrastructure facility will be 145,135 square feet (3.33 acres). There presently exist two buildings on the property. The main building currently has 185,184 square feet of gross floor area at a height of 86 feet measured from the eastern property line. Where is a smaller, one -story building of 1,665 square feet to the north of the main building. This one -story building is proposed to be demolished and enveloped into the main parking lot. The Floor Area Ratio, based on the land area to be retained for the Verizon utility/infrastructure facility and the gross floor area of the main building, is 1.27. This property is located within the East Gateway Character. District of the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan. The adoption of the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan was effective February, 3, 2004. The intensity standards adopted for the East Gateway Character District sets a maximum Floor Area Ratio of 0.55 and a maximum height of 50 feet for office uses (which this is most similar to). As such, this existing Verizon utility/infrastructure facility is nonconforming to both Floor Area Ratio and Height. Community Development Board — March 18,,2008' FLD2007- 11035, — Page 2 of 12 The use of the property utility /infrastructure facility in the Downtown District is provided as a Flexible Standard Development use; therefore, the use is not nonconforming, only the use characteristics of Floor Area Ratio and height. Policy 11 of the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan encourages the relocation of nonconforming uses and prohibits the use of Termination of Status of Nonconformity within the Downtown Plan area. Since this is not a nonconforming use, it has been determined that this request is in conformance with this Policy 11. In order to provide for the sale of the existing parking lot to the north for future residential development, prior to the submission for a site development building permit to construct the site improvements, a Release of Unity of Title and Minor Lot Adjustment application will be required to be submitted to and approved by the Planning Department. Through the development review process, it was determined that the location of public improvements along Cleveland Street actually are located on private property due to a jog in the property line location. As part of this proposal, prior to the issuance of a site development building permit, the owner will need to deed as additional right -of -way, or dedicate as a right -of -way easement, to the City of Clearwater the southern 10 feet for that part of Lots 7 — 10 along Cleveland Street for those existing (or future) public improvements presently located on the Verizon property. As part of this application, the applicant proposes to upgrade their parking lots to City standards and improve the property to landscaping requirements. The majority of the property where the main building is located and much of the parking lot is zoned Downtown (D) District. The very northern portion of this request and the eastern portion of the site adjacent to N. Fredrica Avenue is zoned Medium High Density Residential (MHDR) District. This application includes a Flexible Development application to provide for the improvement for that portion of the property in the D District and a Flexible Development application to provide for the improvement of the nonresidential off - street parking lot in the MHDR District. In the D District, there are no required setbacks, however, vehicular use areas -must be screened from view. In the MHDR District, the required setbacks for nonresidential off - street parking lots are 25- foot front and five -foot side. There is no parking requirement for utility/infrastructure facilities in the Downtown District. The applicant had prepared a Parking Demand Study, Which determined a parking need for 105 parking spaces. This proposal includes the provision of 145 parking spaces, which will more than meet their identified parking need. There is an existing parking area on the west side of the main building adjacent to Cleveland Street and-N. Betty Lane, Existing parking spaces within this small parking area are located within the N. Betty Lane right -qf -way. This proposal includes the removal of parking spaces from this area, retaining this paved area as a equipment service area, rem_ oval of the pavement from the right -of -way and sodding this area and cutting back the pavement five feet from the property line to install landscaping to screen this vehicular use area. This new edge of pavement will need to be curbed to protect the proposed landscaping from vehicular encroachment. The primary parking lot on the north side of the main building will include the removal of the small, one -story building to allow for the improvement of the parking lot, cutting back the pavement to a 10 -foot setback from N. Betty Lane to install landscape screening for the parking lot within the D District and cutting back the pavement to meet the required 25 -foot front setback from N. Betty Lane and installing landscape screening for the parking lot within the MHDR District. Driveways on N. Betty Lane for the subject property will be aligned with the east /west drive aisles in the redesigned main parking lot. The driveways and parking lot design will provide adequate access for both garbage truck and fire truck maneuvering into and through the site. The applicant is providing the required five -foot setback .(to pavement) along the north side of the property. There is a discrepancy in the Code between this required side setback standard in Table 2- 404 and the flexibility criteria of Section 2- 404.C.2, where the required five -foot side setback (which they are meeting) is smaller than the criteria side setback requirement of 10 feet. The applicant is requesting a deviation to provide only the required setback of five -feet along the north property line, as well as requesting a deviation to the flexibility criteria to place the required landscaping on the inside of Community Development Board — March 18,.2008 FLD2007- 11035,— Page 3 of 12 the required fence rather than the outside of the fence. This deviation request also applies to the south side of the property adjacent to the residential out - parcel at 22 N. Fredrica Avenue, where the required fence is proposed along the property line and the landscaping is proposed on the inside of the fence. Placement of the landscaping on the inside of the required fence ensures maintenance of the landscaping by the property owner and aids with site beautification. An existing double dumpster enclosure presently located partially within the N. Betty Lane right -of -way is proposed to be removed and a new double dumpster enclosure meeting City standards will be constructed just north of the main building on the east end of the main parking lot. The main parking lot will be upgraded to comply with City design standards with the requited interior parking lot landscaping. The east side of the main parking lot adjacent to the residential out - parcel at 22 N. Fredrica Avenue (zoned D District) will be improved with a hedge and trees for the screening of the parking lot, with existing nuisance trees removed. There is also a small parking lot on the north side of the main building accessed off N. Fredrica Avenue. The landscape area between this small parking lot and the adjacent detached dwelling at 22 N. Fredrica Avenue will be improved with a continuous hedge and trees to screen this parking area from the detached dwelling. Foundation landscaping will be installed along the edge of the building along N. Fredrica Avenue and Cleveland Street, which will aid in softening the building fagade and improve the street appearance of this otherwise blank -wall building. Termination of Status of Nonconformity: The development proposal includes a request for Termination of Status of Nonconformity for Floor Area Ratio [FAR] (1.27 FAR existing /proposed; where 0.55 FAR permitted today) and for building height (86 feet existing; where 50 -foot height permitted today) in the Downtown District (East Gateway Character District). The adoption of the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan was effective February 3, 2004. The intensity standards adopted for the East Gateway Character District sets a maximum Floor Area Ratio of 0.55 and a maximum height of 50 feet for office uses (which this is most similar to). As such, this existing Verizon utility /infrastructure facility is nonconforming to both Floor Area Ratio and Height. The use of the property utility /infrastructure facility in the Downtown District is provided as a Flexible Standard Development use; therefore, the use is not nonconforming, only the use characteristics of Floor Area Ratio and height. This building has existed at this location at its present floor area and height for some time. From a planning perspective, it is important,to provide for additional residential development on the unused northern parking lot. It is highly unlikely that this Verizon building will be reduced in floor area or height anytime soon, and as such, its existing status in the neighborhood is established. Improvement of the parking lots serving this existing facility and the installation of foundation landscaping adjacent to Cleveland Street and N. Fredrica Avenue will improve the appearance of the. property and its relationship to the surrounding neighborhood. The criteria for Termination of Status of Nonconformity, as per Section 6 -109 of the Community Development Code and outlined in the table below, including compliance with perimeter buffer requirements, the provision of required landscaping for off - street parking lots and bringing nonconforming signs, lighting and accessory uses /structures into compliance with the Code will be met with this development proposal. Community Development Board — March 18, 2008 FLD2007 -11035 —Page 4 of 12 Consistent Inconsistent 1. Perimeter buffers conforming to the requirements of Section 3- 1202.D of the X Community Development Code shall be installed. 2. Off - street parking lots shall be improved to meet the landscaping standards established X in Section 3- 1202.E of the Community Development Code. 3. Any nonconforming sign, outdoor lighting or other accessory structure or accessory X use located on the lot shall be terminated, removed or brought into conformity with this development code. 4.. The comprehensive landscaping and comprehensive sign programs may be used to X satisfy the requirements of this section. Community Development Board — March 18, 2008 FLD2007 -11035 —Page 4 of 12 Pursuant to Section 3- 1202.D, there are no perimeter buffers required in the Downtown District, but there are perimeter buffers required in the Medium High Density Residential District. Parking lots and vehicular use areas are required to be screened from view by walls, fences or landscaping by the Design Guidelines of the Downtown Redevelopment Plan. The equipment service area on the west side of the main building, the main parking lot to the north of the main building and the small parking lot accessed off N. Fredrica Avenue are being improved to meet the screening requirement of the Design Guidelines and the perimeter buffer requirements in the MHDR District. There exists a masonry wall on the south side of the driveway for the small parking lot accessed off N. Fredrica Avenue that will either be reduced in height to 30- inches or removed completely and landscaping installed to provide such screening and to meet the sight visibility triangle requirements.' There are no nonconforming signs or outdoor lighting on this site. The accessory dumpster enclosure presently located partially within the N. Betty Lane right -of- way will be removed as part of this proposal. Impervious Surface Ratio (I.S.R.� In the Downtown District, the allowable I.S.R is governed by the Downtown Redevelopment Plan. While the Downtown Redevelopment Plan does not state a maximum I.S.R, since there are no setback requirements, it is. presumed the maximum I.S.R is 1.0. Pursuant to Section 2 -401.1 of the Community Development Code, the maximum allowable I.S.R. in the MHDR District is 0.85. The overall existing I.S.R is 0.86 and the proposed I.S.R. is 0.80, which is consistent with the Code provisions. Minimum Lot Area and Width: There are no minimum lot area and lot width requirements in the Downtown District. Pursuant to Table 2 -404 of the Community Development Code (MHDR District), there are no minimum lot area and lot width requirements for "nonresidential off - street parking." Minimum Setbacks: In the Downtown District there are no required setbacks. Pursuant to Table 2 -404 of the Community Development Code for "nonresidential off - street parking" in the MHDR District, the minimum front setback is 25 feet and the minimum side setback is five feet (there is no rear setback for this property). The proposal is complying with the, minimum front setback requirement in the MHDR District along N. Betty .Lane and N. Fredrica Avenue, as well as the minimum side setback along the north property line. There is a discrepancy in the Code between the required side setback standard in Table 2 -404 and the flexibility criteria of Section 2- 404.C.2, where the required five -foot side setback (which they are meeting) is smaller than the flexibility criteria requirement of 10 feet. The applicant is requesting a deviation to provide the- required setback of five -feet along the north property line, which is acceptable. Maximum Buildin Height: This property is located within the East Gateway Character District of the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan. The adoption of the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan was effective February 3, 2004. The intensity standards adopted for the East Gateway Character District set a maximum height of 50 feet for office uses (which this is most similar to). The main building currently is at a height of 86 feet measured from the .eastern property line. As such, this existing Verizon utility/infrastructure facility is nonconforming to height. The applicant is requesting to terminate this nonconforming use characteristic to allow the building to remain as is (see discussion under Termination of Status of Nonconformity above). Minimum. Off - Street Parking: There is no parking requirement for utility /infrastructure facilities in the Downtown District. The applicant, had prepared a Parking Demand Study, which determined a parking need for 105 parking spaces. The proposal includes the provision of 145 parking spaces. The proposal includes upgrading the driveways, parking areas and vehicular use areas to meet Code provisions for .design and landscaping (see also discussion under Development Proposal above). Community Development Board — March 18, 2008 FLD2007- 11035• —Page 5 of 12 Mechanical Equipment: Pursuant to Section 3- 201.D.1 of the Community Development Code, all outside mechanical equipment must be screened so as not to be visible from public streets and /or abutting properties. Except for an equipment area on the west side of the building that is screened by a six -foot high wall, all mechanical equipment is on the roof. There is a paved equipment service area on the west side of the building that will be improved to City standards. This equipment service area is for. equipment that is located within the building. The development proposal is consistent with the Code with regard to screening of outdoor mechanical equipment. Sight Visibility Triangles: Pursuant to Section 3 -904.A of the Community Development Code, to minimize hazards at driveway intersections on N. Betty Lane and N. Fredrica Avenue, no structures or landscaping may be installed which will obstruct views at a level between 30 inches above grade and eight feet above grade within 20 -foot sight visibility triangles. The proposed site and landscape design meet this requirement. Utilities: Pursuant to Section 3 -911 of the Community Development Code, for development that does not involve a subdivision, all utilities including individual distribution lines shall be installed underground unless such undergrounding is not practicable. There exists overhead utility lines along the east side of N. Betty Lane adjacent to this site and running north/south through the site serving the residential out - parcel at 22 N. Fredrica Avenue. The submitted site plan includes a note that all utilities will be placed underground. The site plan also indicates for the overhead utility lines that run north/south through the site serving the residential out - parcel at 22 N. Fredrica Avenue to be removed and that utilities will be relocated to serve the dwelling from N. Fredrica Avenue. In a telephone conversation with the property owner of 22 N. Fredrica Avenue, concern was expressed as to how that would be effected and that it not be at his expense. To ensure the overhead utilities within the N. Betty Lane are placed underground, any approval of this request should include a condition of approval for such. Additionally, a condition of approval should be included to ensure the relocation of utility service to 22 N. Fredrica Avenue be acceptable to that property owner and not be at his expense. Landscaping: Pursuant to Section 3- 1202.D, there gre no perimeter buffers required in the Downtown District, but. there are perimeter buffers required in the Medium High Density Residential District. Parking lots and vehicular use areas are required to be screened from view by walls, fences or landscaping by the Design Guidelines of the Downtown Redevelopment Plan. The equipment service area on the west side of the main building, the main parking lot to the north of the main building and the small parking lot accessed off N. Fredrica Avenue are being improved to meet the screening requirement of the Design Guidelines and the perimeter buffer requirements in the MHDR District. Section 3- 1202.D.1 for perimeter buffers of a nonresidential use adjacent to a detached dwelling requires shrubbery attain six feet height within three years along the north side of the existing detached dwelling. This should be included as a condition of approval. The proposal includes the installation of interior landscaping in excess of Code requirements to break up the pavement of the main parking lot to allow for shading of the pavement. Vertical concrete curbing is required on -site to protect landscape materials and areas from vehicular encroachment. The proposal indicates such curbing except along the edges of the equipment service area on the west side of the building, which should be required as a condition of approval. The landscape design represents a dramatic visual improvement to this site, one that will provide visual interest and .shade to the _parking areas, as well as substantially enhancing and upgrading the neighborhood appearance. Live oak, crape myrtle and weeping yaupon holly trees will be planted adjacent to or within the parking lot. Travelers Palm, fishtail palm and weeping yaupon holly trees will be planted within foundation landscape areas. Crape myrtle trees will be planted within the Cleveland Street right -of -way as street trees. The proposed on -site landscaping complies with and exceeds Code requirements. Community Development Board — March 18, 2008 FLD2007-1103 5. — Page 6 of 12 Solid Waste: An existing double dumpster enclosure presently located partially within the N. Betty Lane right -of -way is proposed to be removed and a new double dumpster enclosure meeting City standards will be constructed just north of the main building on the east end of the main parking lot. The access driveways and parking lot has been designed for trash truck maneuvering. The proposal has been found to be acceptable by the City's Solid Waste Department. Signage: There are no existing or proposed freestanding signs for this property. There are two small attached signs on the building, one on the south side and one on the west side, that are to remain as is. No additional attached signage is proposed. Code Enforcement Analysis: There are no outstanding Code Enforcement issues associated with the subject property. COMPLIANCE WITH STANDARDS AND CRITERIA: The following table depicts the consistency of the overnight accommodation use development proposal with the standards as per the East Gateway Character District standards in the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan and Tables 2- 401.1 and 2- 404 of the Community Development Code: I See analysis on Termination of Status of Nonconformity Community Development Board — March 18,, 2008 FLD2007-1103 5. — Page 7 of 12 Standard Proposed Consistent Inconsistent FAR 0.55 1.27 Xt I.S.R. Downtown: 1.0 Overall: 0.80 X MHDR: 0.85 Setbacks Front: Downtown: Zero feet Downtown: South — 3.09 X MHDR: 25 feet feet (to building); West: five feet (to pavement); East: 1.54 feet (to building) MHDR: West: 25 feet (to pavement); East: 25 feet (to pavement) Side: Downtown: Zero feet Downtown: North: Seven X -MHDR- Five feet feet (to pavement) MHDR: North: Five feet (to pavement) MHDR: South: 95 feet (to X pavement) Rear: Downtown: Zero feet Downtown: East: Seven X MHDR: 10 feet feet (to pavement and dumpster enclosure) MHDR: N/A Height 50 feet 86 feet (measured fi•om east X1 property line to highest roof deck Off - Street None 145 spaces X Parkin I See analysis on Termination of Status of Nonconformity Community Development Board — March 18,, 2008 FLD2007-1103 5. — Page 7 of 12 COMPLIANCE WITH FLEXIBILITY CRITERIA: The following table depicts the consistency of the development proposal with the Flexibility criteria as per Section 2 -903.0 of the Community Development Code (Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project): Community Development Board — March 18, 2008 FLD2007-1103 5. — Page 8 of 12 Consistent Inconsistent 1. The development or redevelopment is otherwise impractical without deviations from X the use and/or development standards set forth in this zoning district. 2. The development or redevelopment will be consistent with the goals and policies of X the Comprehensive Plan, as well as with the general purpose, intent and basic t planning objectives of this Code, and with the intent and purpose of this zoning district. 3. The development or redevelopment will not impede the normal and orderly X development and improvement of surrounding properties. 4. Adjoining properties,will not suffer substantial detriment as a result of the proposed X development 5. The proposed use shall otherwise be permitted by the underlying future land use X category, be compatible with adjacent land uses, will not substantially alter the essential use characteristics of the neighborhood; and shall demonstrate compliance with one or more of the following objectives: a. The proposed use is permitted in this zoning district as a minimum standard, flexible standard or flexible development use; b. The proposed use would be a significant economic contributor to the City's economic base by diversifying the local economy or by creating jobs; c. The development proposal accommodates the expansion or redevelopment of an existing economic contributor; d. The proposed use provides for the provision of affordable housing; e. The proposed use provides, for development or redevelopment in an area that is characterized by other similar development and where a land use plan amendment and rezoning would result in a spot land use or zoning designation; or f The proposed use provides for the development of a new and/or preservation of a working waterfront use. 6. Flexibility with regard to use, lot width, required setbabks, height and off - street X parking are justified based on demonstrated compliance with all of the following design objectives: a. The proposed development will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of the surrounding properties for uses permitted in this zoning district; b. The proposed development complies with applicable design guidelines adopted by the City; c. The design, scale and intensity of the proposed development supports the established or emerging character of an area; d. In order to form a cohesive, visually interesting and attractive appearance, the proposed development incorporates a substantial number of the following design elements: ❑ Changes in horizontal building planes; ❑ Use of architectural details such as columns, cornices, stringcourses, pilasters, porticos, balconies, railings, awnings, etc.; ❑ Variety in materials, colors and textures; ❑ Distinctive fenestration patterns; ❑ Building stepbacks; ,and ❑ Distinctive roofs forms. e. The proposed development provides for appropriate buffers, enhanced landscape design and appropriate distances between buildings. Community Development Board — March 18, 2008 FLD2007-1103 5. — Page 8 of 12 The following table depicts the consistency of the development proposal with the Flexibility criteria as per Section 2 -404.F of the Community Development Code (Residential Infill Project): COMPLIANCE WITH GENERAL STANDARDS FOR LEVEL TWO APPROVALS: The following table depicts the consistency of the development proposal with the General Standards for Level Two Approvals as per Section 3 -913 of the Community Development Code: Consistent Inconsistent 1. The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development is X otherwise impractical without deviations from one or more of the following: intensity or other development standards. X 2. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a residential infill X project will not materially reduce the fair market value of abutting properties. X 3. The uses within the residential infill project are otherwise permitted in the district. X 4. The uses within the residential infill project are compatible with adjacent land uses. X 5. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a residential infill X project will upgrade the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. 6. The design of the proposed residential infill project creates a form and function X which enhances the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. 7. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height, off - street parking, access X or other development standards are justified by the benefits to community character and the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. COMPLIANCE WITH GENERAL STANDARDS FOR LEVEL TWO APPROVALS: The following table depicts the consistency of the development proposal with the General Standards for Level Two Approvals as per Section 3 -913 of the Community Development Code: SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION: The Development Review Committee (DRC) reviewed the application and supporting materials at its meetings of December 6, 2007, and February 7, 2008, and deemed the development proposal to be sufficient to move forward to the Community Development Board (CDB), based upon the following findings of fact and conclusions of law: Findings of Fact: 1. The 3.33 acres is located on the north side of Cleveland Street between N. Betty Lane and N. Fredrica Avenue; Community Development Board — March 18, 2008 FLD2007 -11035 — Page 9 of 12 Consistent Inconsistent 1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, X coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage development and use of X adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons X residing or working in the neighborhood. 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. X 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the X immediate vicinity. 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including X visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts on adjacent properties. SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION: The Development Review Committee (DRC) reviewed the application and supporting materials at its meetings of December 6, 2007, and February 7, 2008, and deemed the development proposal to be sufficient to move forward to the Community Development Board (CDB), based upon the following findings of fact and conclusions of law: Findings of Fact: 1. The 3.33 acres is located on the north side of Cleveland Street between N. Betty Lane and N. Fredrica Avenue; Community Development Board — March 18, 2008 FLD2007 -11035 — Page 9 of 12 2. The property owner owns the entire block between Cleveland Street, Drew Street, N. Betty Lane and N. Fredrica Avenue, except the residential out - parcel at 22 N. Fredrica Avenue; 3. It is the owners' desire to split off the northern portion of the parking lot that is no longer needed and sell it for residential development; 4. The buildings and a portion of the accessory parking lot is zoned Downtown (D) District, while the majority of the accessory parking lot to the north of the main building is zoned Medium High Density Residential (MHDR) District; 5. The property has been developed with the utility/infrastructure facility for some time, as well as the accessory parking lot on the north side of the building; 6. The land area to be retained for the Verizon utility/infrastructure facility will be 145,135 square feet (3.33 acres); 7. The main building currently has 185,184 square feet of gross floor area at a height of 86 feet measured from the eastern property line; 8. The Floor Area Ratio, based on the land area to be retained for the Verizon utility /infrastructure facility and the gross floor area of the main building, is 1.27; 9. The intensity standards adopted for the East Gateway Character District sets a maximum Floor Area Ratio of 0.55 and a maximum height of 50 feet for office uses (which this is most similar to); 10. The existing Verizon utility /infrastructure facility is nonconforming to both Floor Area Ratio and Height; 11. The development proposal includes a request for Termination of Status of Nonconformity for Floor Area Ratio [FAR] (1.27 FAR existing /proposed; where 0.55 FAR permitted today) and for building height (86 feet existing; where 50 -foot height permitted today) in the Downtown District (East Gateway Character District); 12. The applicant proposes to upgrade their parking lots to City standards and improve the property to landscaping requirements; 13. There is no parking requirement for utility/infrastructure facilities in the Downtown District. The applicant had prepared a Parking Demand Study, which determined a parking need for 105 parking spaces. This proposal includes the provision of 145 parking spaces, which will more than meet their identified parking need; 14. The primary parking lot on the north side of the main building will include the removal of the small, one -story building to allow for the improvement of the parking lot, cutting back the pavement to a 10 -foot setback from N. Betty Lane to install landscape screening for the parking lot within the D District and cutting back the pavement to meet the required 25 -foot front setback from N. Betty Lane and installing landscape screening for the parking lot within the MHDR District; 15. The applicant is requesting a deviation to provide only the required setback of five -feet along the north property line, as well as requesting a deviation to the flexibility criteria to place the required landscaping on the inside of the required fence rather than the outside of the fence. This deviation request also applies to the south side of the property adjacent to the residential out - parcel at 22 N. Fredrica Avenue, where the required fence is proposed along the property line and the landscaping is proposed on the inside of the fence; 16. Foundation landscaping will be installed along the edge of the building along N. Fredrica Avenue and Cleveland Street, which will aid in softening the building fagade and improve the street appearance of this otherwise blank -wall building; 17. The landscape design represents a dramatic visual improvement to this site, one that will provide visual interest and shade to the parking areas, as well as substantially enhancing and upgrading the neighborhood appearance; 18. There are no outstanding Code Enforcement issues associated with the subject property. Community Development Board — March 18, 2008 FLD2007 -11035 — Page 10 of 12 Conclusions of Law: 1. That the development proposal is consistent with the Flexibility criteria for Termination of Status of Nonconformity as per Section 6 -109 of the Community Development Code; 2. That the development proposal is consistent with the Standards as per Table 2 -902 for the Downtown District and Tables 2 -401.1 and 2 -404 of the Community Development Code; 3. That the development proposal is consistent with the Flexibility criteria as per Section 2 -903.0 of the Community Development Code; 4. That the development proposal is consistent with the Flexibility criteria as per Section 24041 of the Community Development Code; 5. That the development proposal is consistent with the General Standards for Level Two Approvals as per Section 3 -913 of the Community Development Code; and 6. That the development proposal is consistent with the Design Guidelines of the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment. Plan. Based upon the above, the Planning Department recommends APPROVAL of the Flexible Development application (1) for the Termination of Status of Nonconformity for Floor Area Ratio [FAR] (1.27 FAR existing /proposed; where 0.55 FAR permitted today) and for building height (86 feet existing; where 50- foot height permitted today) in the Downtown District (East Gateway Character District), under the provisions of Section 6 -109; (2) to permit the improvement of the existing site and parking areas for a "utilities /infrastructure facility" use in the Downtown District, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2- 903.C; and (3) to permit Nonresidential Off - Street Parking in the Medium High Density Residential (MHDR) District with deviations to reduce the side (north) setback from 10 to five feet (to pavement) and to allow the placement of landscaping on the inside of the buffer fence /wall along the north and south sides of the property, as a Residential Infill Project, under the provisions of Section 2- 404.F, with the following conditions: Conditions of Approval: 1. That, prior to the submission for a site development building permit to effect the site changes, a Release of Unity of Title and Minor Lot Adjustment application be submitted to and approved by the Planning Department; 2. That, prior to the issuance of a site development building permit, the owner deed as additional right - of -way, or dedicate as a right -of -way easement, to the City of Clearwater the southern 10 feet for that part of Lots 7 — 10 along Cleveland Street; 3. That the shrubs along the north side of the existing detached dwelling attain six feet height within three years; 4. That the existing overhead utility lines which run along the east side of Betty Lane be placed underground prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Completion on the site improvements building permit; 5. That the relocation of the existing overhead utilities serving 22 N. Fredrica Avenue be in a manner and location acceptable to, and at no expense to, that property owner; 6. That, prior to the issuance of a site development building permit, the site and landscape plans be amended to show vertical curbing along the edge of pavement for the equipment service area on the west side of the building adjacent to Cleveland Street and N. Betty Lane; and 7. That, prior to the issuance of a site development building permit, compliance with all requirements of General Engineering, Stormwater Engineering and Traffic Engineering be met. Prepared by Planning Department Staff: M - W" Wayne M. ells, AICP, Planner III Community Development Board — March 18, 2008 FLD2007 -11035 — Page 11 of 12 ATTACHMENTS: ❑ Location Map ❑ Aerial Map ❑ Zoning Map ❑ Existing Surrounding Uses Map ❑ Photographs of Site and Vicinity S: (Planning DepartmentlC D BIFLEX (FLD) (Pending cases)Up for the next CDBICleveland 1280 Verizon Office (D and MHDR) - 3.18.08 CDB - WMCleveland 1280 Staff Report.doc Community Development Board — March 18, 2008 FLD2007 -11035 — Page 12 of 12 Wells, Wayne From: Sent: To: Subject: 1 Cleveland 0 Staff Report.c Dave - Wells, Wayne Thursday, March 13, 2008 10:05 AM 'ddurfee @tampabay.rr.com' FLD2007 -11035 Attached is the Staff Report for this application. Please see the conditions of approval regarding your property. Wayne - - - -- Original Message---- - From: David @ddurfee.com [ mailto:ddurfee @tampabay.rr.com] Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2008 9:48 AM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: Fwd: FLD200711035 David Durfee 813 334 -1059 1 uj uj uj LLJ <> RD FORES12 RI 0 0 In 0 z 0 PROJECT (n 0 ui U) ui SITE U) !> I< CRESTVIE F—B r.j,,, n uWj 0 LLJ s 0 ❑ !Lj LL, > w <> LIJ z W lJ GROVE 'j ST 11 ----------------- 0— Jul I Zi W 0 Wz L ST < 7ir 1 'u'j z W 0 PARK PARK ST 0", 7 Ulzu"I u 1>w)f L' U—) ui LPIERCE Q ST Evergreen >< W P Z- n <. C. co <1 z I < FRANKLM ST G, FRANKLIN/ '%,\' ST CIR DELEON SAN ROSA SAN JUAN ST LOCATION MAP Owner: GTE of Florida, Inc. Case: FLD2007-11035 Site: 1280 Cleveland Street Property Size(Acres): 3.28 15/29/15/12276/003/0010 PINS: 15/29/15/12276/003/0130 15/29/15/26658/000/0010 15/29/15/65250/002/0010 287B Atlas Page: 0 0 Ail � d�u 4`1 e �'%i '!s �` Vii., � •I., -. � ` � � �,�- ` � �� Y i' AIL AERIAL MAP Owner: GTE of Flotida, Inc. :--ase: FLD2007 -1 1035 I site: 1280 Clevel end Street 'roperty 140 15/29/15/12276/003 /0010 PINS: 15/29/15/1226/003/0130 15/29/15/2b6:8/000/0010 15/29/15/652f.0/002/0010 Atlas Page: 2878 65 DREW ST R ^° ° u 1 118 40 L-21 G i� r o� 40 25 26 ' N N 2 1 73 1 I F r II N ' @ 40 I I �2665� I 60 — —13 1 lOs 2 14 105 _ 3 12 2 4 124 II 1 2� 27 21 23 — — 24 17 25 26 27 -13— — — — — — 29 28 4 6 2 I (�- fi i 2 11 - — 125 6 7 30 a 13 1 m 3 128 126 4 1 3 1 2 1 — 1 — 1 ' — — — —1- 3 — 5 121 9 1 10 136 4 W —mHbR — 4 — 19 116 123 114 6 m N 117 — 8 _ 114 7 121 m — _ —101 —_ 5 115 112 113 112 6 ,p 7 — — — — — — — 6 1 \J 9 11 111 z tto 7 ■ ■ ■ ■ ■■� ■■ H =l� v 1081 12 109 11 — — — — —9 — — 7 Q 106 m 107 8 8 U X10 N I 11 I� 12 4 1 132 X14 15 9— Q 40 N 1 2 W GROVE ST^ 53 . 3 10 LL i� r o� 40 25 26 ' 27 2 I 73 1 30 131 19 1 18 5i ;S � I _ 1 T-- � I 65286 1 ^- I 4 �I 5 6 I I I tlar 7 1 8 1 9 1 10 15 116 11711 40 I 1 I O I n r M M N M I I 1 3 2 1 1 123 6 121 7 122 120 119 9 8 118 113 10 11 12 110 — —13 1 lOs 2 14 105 _ 17 4 100 31 18 19 — 30 20 _ 27 21 21 22 23 — — 24 17 25 26 27 -13— — — — — — 29 28 I1;z133�7 E�(� Ili 11111 OS /R 60 r I� {I II b I 1 1 I. Lk 4 5 6 _ F ILL - 8 9 —10 0 12 13 I— 14 Q 1�L 1 15 8 Z 16 1�v1 I 9 I 60 I I I - - - - - -- D CLE ELAND ST C II I II I I I11�11 IIIN 111 1111 I t, 191 117 151 ,3 111 191 17 T 131 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I 1019 I8 17 16 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ,I 101 I jB 1 1161 174 1121 �01 8 6 q 2 9 16 716 5 413 2 1 g 13 2 1 1 1 15 4 1 3 12 1 1 8 1 7 16 5 4 3 1 LI _ ,� >_ I I I I I I v I I I I I — 1 _ I I_ ,_, I I� �rz1 — I 5 11 12 9 1 126 1� r1 b7 I 139 I 141 p3 1 11112 61 11511, 18 19 — — — — — 1 r14e1X01 IP41F1rIi1 ;21120 W II III s((4)1 —- 14t�9if13 —_ �6 0 — I III I I I III I m I I `I 15_ 1-16 1 y — 124 — 1- 8 1 18 1 17 ZONING MAP Owner: GTE of Florida, Inc. Case: FLD2007 -1 1035 Site: 1280 Cleveland Street Property 3.40 Size(Acres): 15/29/15/12276/003 /0010 PINS: 15/29/15/12276/003 /0130 15/29/15/26658/000 /0010 15/29/15/65250/002 /0010 Atlas Page: 287B a 40 C\ 40 �as386 I 70 DREW ST a I I I I� II I IIIII I ICI' � 1��1 i II I I 0 dep I7 ffig0S 41 179 117 1151 1 1 I 1 I I 78 1 1161 114 1x 1 h01 8 6 a x 9 18 7 _ L II 1111 Z 1 1 I 14 126127 66 19 I" p3 67 I lag 1 141 ix IIII 1 1 1 1 I f4 1361 l i i l 1 1 z0 m 1 bf I I 11 I I I ti I� g PARK ST 1 L 1952 2276 69 t d 11� A Attached_ dweii'14S � II L110 111 -- __ Attached — 6 1 gS I , 123 s etas 11s 9 _ — 7 1 113 11'in 8 U 105 1a- 1 1 etaehe I Q 4 1 8 sI 60 welly — _ 10 27 21 taehe 23 u' — Deta� A — — S dwelli g — — 13 _ 14 1 10 1 15 116 1 17118 1 1 1 w Attached_ dweii'14S � II L110 111 -- __ Attached �iw lei 1 gS I , 123 s etas 11s 9 w8e log 1 113 11'in —11— _ 12 11 13 105 1a- 1 1 etaehe I Q 4 1 8 sI 60 welly 19 30 ache 27 21 taehe 23 ellr►g 24 Ot 29 28 133 io 11 137 4I'I�11C Ae5ohir roan' I I I I I Attached_ dweii'14S � II L110 111 -- __ Attached 11 Q 12 I 13 � 14 a I Q 1ItL jj �C� ,SzI 8 sI 60 I„ 1 191 121 I I �l �I I CLEVELAND ST I I I 1 so 1 eo rI�n,t 1 1 1I I I I I I I I I 1911 1 4 13 12 1 10 IIWI e I u }I ®13 1 110 lad. 5 11 12 1leppir 111 118 I )- — —1a t C — s — — ( 0 _ I �� 15 - -- -- —I -16 -- -- 1 S3 8 18 1 17 1 EXISTING SURROUNDING USES MAP Owner: GTE of Florida, Inc. Case: FLD2007 -1 1035 Site: 1280 Cleveland Street Property 3.40 Size(Acres): 15/29/15/12276/003 /0010 PINS: 15/29/15/12276/003 /0130 15/29/15/26658/000 /0010 15/29/15/65250/002 /0010 Atlas Page: 287B View looking north f-om Cevelind'•t at t View looking north at existing X irking amz it southvwest corner of building View looking south at existing arr_pster and equipment enclosure on west si--e c building 1280 Cleveland Street View looking northeas- along Ceti --land St T .. T .1 • 1 �1 l View looking north at existr_g durrpster and equipment e-rcicsure on weal di,L, )f building View lookir_g n.)r-.hea3t at cue , )ry building (to be demolished; FLDE2007 -110 3 5 Page 1 of 3 View looking west at western portion of the north View looking north from Cleveland St at the southeast corner of the existing bui ding View looking northeast from N. Betty Ln at the parking area north of the existing building 1280 Cleveland Street View looking west at parking area on tze eastern View looking northwest along Cleveland St from Fredrica Ave at the View looking northwest from Cleveland St at existing motel on west side of N. Betty Lane FLD2007 -1103 5 Page 2 of 3 View looking southwest at existing busi- iesses on south side of Cleveland St west of Betty Lane Fredrica Ave v View looking north at existing gas staticn at 1310 Cleveland St (to be redeveloped for reta_1 sales) 1280 Cleveland Street View looking northwest at Existing detached View looking northwest at t_1e existing retention pond north of 22 N Fredrica Ave View looking southeast at existing business at 1315 Cleveland St FLD2007 -11035 Page 3 of 3 R 2 i Conditions Associated With FLD2007 -11035 1280 CLEVELAND ST Engineering Condition Steve Doherty 562 -4773 01/28/2008 Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Completion: Not Met 1. 180 -feet of public sidewalk along Cleveland Street is presently located within a 10 -foot wide strip of private property. Public utililites are also located in this portion of property. Applicant shall deed or dedicate to the City of Clearwater a 10 -foot right -of -way easement. At 2/07/08 DRC MEETING REPRESENTATIVE AGREED TO DISCUSS THIS CONDITION WITH PROPERTY OWNER. 2. Applicant shall submit 5 sets of as -built drawings that are signed and sealed by a professional engineer registered in the State of Florida. Construction Services Inspector will field inspect as -built drawings for accuracy. ACKNOWLEDGED General Note: DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. Environmental Condition Sarah Josuns 562 -4897 11/19/2007 A "one story block building" and a "wood frame addition" are shown on the survey in an area Not Met proposed as parking on the site plan. If buildings are to be demolished, an Asbestos Survey and Notification to Pinellas County Air Quality is required prior to demolition. Landscape Wayne Wells, AICP 727 - 562 -4504 01/28/2008 2/21/08 & 1/28/08 - WW Not Met Condition of Approval to be included in the Staff Report: That the shrubs along the north side of the existing detached dwelling attain six feet height within three years; Storm Water Condition Phuong Vo 562 -4752 01/30/2008 The following shall be addressed prior to review by the Community Development Board: Not Met 1. Provide a grading and drainage plan showing the proposed grades of the new parking lot. 02/07/08 ACKNOWLEGED BY APPLICANT. 2. Provide drainage narrative and calculations addressing the increased impervious area. Per the telephone conversation among the Engineer, Richard Harris, Bob Maran, and Phuong Vo on 1/30/08, the increase impervious area may be addressed by payment in lieu option. 02/07/08 ACKNOWLEGED BY APPLICANT. 3. It appears that the proposed 24'x10' dumpster enclosure is located on top of an existing stormwater inlet; please relocate the inlet to the west of the proposed dumpster or provide a different location for this dumpster. 02/07/2008 APPLICANT AGREED TO RELOCATE INLET. 4. The existing grate inlet located near the proposed concrete flume to the east shall not be blocked by the proposed curb and wheel stop. 02/07/08 ACKNOWLEGED BY APPLICANT. 5. When the northern portion is being redeveloped, the City will require either an on -site new retention pond with new outfall to a stormwater pipe in Fredrica Drive or an agreement between the two owners allowing the existing pond and private stormwater facilities to be used for the northern portion and allowing for pond maintenance. 02/07/08 ACKNOWLEGED BY APPLICANT. NOTE: If the proposed development of the northerly property necessitates infrastructure modifications to satisfy site- specific stormwater outfall needs the modifications shall be completed by the applicant and at their expense. 02/07/08 ACKNOWLEGED BY APPLICANT. The following shall be addressed prior to the issuance of building permit. Print Date: 03/10/2008 Page 1 of 3 CaseConditons FLD2007 -11035 1280 CLEVELAND ST Storm Water Condition Phuong Vo 562 -4752 1. All storm pipes and storm structures shall be cleaned and made functional. 02/07/08 ACKNOWLEGED BY APPLICANT. 2. Applicant shall acknowledge in writing that if the northern portion at the later time being redeveloped and has its own storm system and retention pond on site, the owner of the southern portion shall tie the existing storm system into the existing pond. (Currently, the southern portion's storm system ties directly into the City's system) 02/07/08 ACKNOWLEGED BY APPLICANT. 3. The grading plan shall show the complete storm sewer system. 02/07/08 ACKNOWLEGED BY APPLICANT. 4. Provide an approved SWFWMD permit or letter of exemption. 02/07/08 ACKNOWLEGED BY APPLICANT. General notes: 02/07/08 ACKNOWLEGED BY APPLICANT. 1. DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. 2. At building permit application, applicant shall submit all documentation again for review Traffic Eng Condition Bennett Elbo 562 -4775 11/24/2007 The accessible route from handicap parking spaces to a building's accessible entrance shall be exclusive of the 24' wide drive aisle. (Note: Ramp to the accessible entrance is near the west property line. Crossing should me moved this direction.) 02/07/08 ACKNOWLEGED BY APPLICANT. 2. Provide an accessible route from a building's accessible entrance to a public sidewalk compliant with Florida Accessibility Code for Building Construction Chapter 11, Section 11- 4.3.2. 02/07/08 ACKNOWLEGED BY APPLICANT. 3. A tall brick enclosure located in the sight - visibility triangle on the soulth side of the property entrance on Fredrica shall be removed. This structure exceeds the 30 -inch height maximum per Community Development Code Section 3 -904. 02/07/08 ACKNOWLEGED BY APPLICANT. The above to be addressed prior to a Community Development Board (CDB) hearing. The following shall be addressed prior to the issuance of building permit. 1. Provide handicapped parking stall and sign details compliant with City standards. http: / /www.myclearwater.com /gov /depts /pwa /engin /Production /stddet/index.asp 02/07/08 ACKNOWLEGED BY APPLICANT. General Note(s): 02/07/08 ACKNOWLEGED BY APPLICANT. 1) Applicant shall comply with the current Transportation Impact Fee Ordinance and fee schedule and paid prior to a Certificate of Occupancy (C.O.). 2) DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. Zoning Condition Wayne Wells, AICP 727 - 562 -4504 11/26/2007 2/21/08 - WW Include as a condition of approval in the Staff Report. 1/30/08 - WW No response to east side of Betty Lane. 11/26/07 - WW Existing overhead utility lines run along the east side of Betty Lane and down the "middle" of the subject property. Section 3 -911 requires the undergrounding of these overhead utility lines. Such undergrounding of these existing overhead utility lines appears feasible. Not Met Not Met CaseConditons Print Date: 03/10/2008 Page 2 of 3 FLD2007 -11035 1280 CLEVELAND ST Zoning Condition Wayne Wells, AICP 727 - 562 -4504 01/30/2008 3/10/08 - WW Not Met A five -foot landscape area now provided. This needs to be curbed. Include as a condition of approval in the Staff Report. 2/21/08 - WW No explanatory response provided, nor any changes to the plans indicated. 1/30/08 - WW Equipment service area on west side of the building - Unclear why it must be 22.3 feet in width (from Betty Lane property line) and why it must go all the way to Cleveland Street. Cut back to what is necessary or provide justification as to why it must be the proposed dimensions (see other Zoning comment regarding screening of this area). Application Narrative - Provide a description of the equipment service area, including the need for such (any necessary enlightening background information) and how it will function. 11/27/2007 2/21/08,1/30/08 & 11/27/07 - WW Not Met The purpose of this request is to be able to sell off the northern portion of the site for other development. As such, the following will be included as a condition of approval: That, prior to the submission for a site development building permit to effect the site changes, a Release of Unity of Title and Minor Lot Adjustment application be submitted to and approved by the Planning Department. 12/02/2007 2/21/08 - WW Not Met Sheet 1/1 now indicates the building to be 86 feet in height. It is really that tall? Additionally, no written material was submitted setting forth the Termination of Status of Nonconformity criteria and responses to such criteria (see criteria below). 12/2/07 - WW Under the East Gateway District of the Downtown Redevelopment Plan, the maximum floor area ratio (FAR) is 0.55 and the maximum height is 50 feet. The proposed FAR exceeds the maximum of 0.55, which is deemed to be nonconforming to that permitted under the Downtown Redevelopment Plan. Additionally, while the actual building height is NOT provided, the application previously noted that the height exceeds the maximum of 50 feet. Provide the existing height. Assumed to be greater than 50 feet in height, which is also nonconforming to that permitted under the Downtown Redevelopment Plan. The application must also request a Termination of Status of Nonconformity for building height (in addition to FAR), under the provisions of Section 6 -109. For the Termination portion of this request, need to provide written responses to the requirements under Section 6- 109.C: a. Perimeter buffers conforming to the requirements of section 3- 1202(C) shall be installed. b. Off - street parking lots shall be improved to meet the landscaping standards established in section 3- 1202(D). c. Any nonconforming sign, outdoor lighting or other accessory structure or accessory use located on the lot shall be terminated, removed or brought into conformity with this development code. d. The comprehensive landscaping and comprehensive sign programs may be used to satisfy the requirements of this section. Print Date: 03/10/2008 Page 3 of 3 CaseConditons Wells, Wayne From: Albee, Rick Sent: Friday, February 22, 2008 9:38 AM To: Watkins, Sherry; Wells, Wayne; Tefft, Robert Subject: RE: Resubmittals for the March 18, 2008 CDB Meeting 1280 Cleveland- Conditions Met. 612 Druid- Updated conditions, some Met some deferred to.building permit. - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Watkins, Sherry Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2008 8:18 AM To: Buzzell, William; Chase, Susan; Dougall- Sides, Leslie; DRC Members; Gluski, Roberta; .Hollander, Gwen; Hufford, Diane; James Miller; Josuns, Sarah; Lutz, Deb; Patni, Himanshu; Reid, Debbie; Rickard, Leonard; Shell, Heather C.; US Post Office (E- mail); Vo, Phuong; Yellin, Catherine Subject: Resubmittals for the March 18, 2008 CDB Meeting DRC Members, Plans for the following cases have been resubmitted for the March 18, 2008 CDB Meeting: FLD2007 -11035 1280 Cleveland Street Planner: Wayne Wells FLD2007 -12040 612 Druid Road Planner Robert Tefft I have placed one copy of the case resubmittal package on the cabinets outside of Room 216 in our office for your review (Please do not take it or any of the other copies as they are needed for the CDB members ) Please review your comments /conditions for this cases in Permit Plan and determine if they are met. Whether the conditions are "met' or still "not met," please affirm to me via email. Please have these cases reviewed by Friday, February 22, 2008 by 4:30PM. Thank you Sherry Watkins Administrative Analyst Planning Department 562 -4582 Wells, Wayne From: Watkins, Sherry Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2008 11:05 AM To: Wells, Wayne; Tefft, Robert Subject: FW: Resubmittals for the March 18, 2008 CDB Meeting - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Reid, Debbie Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2008 10:45 AM To: Watkins, Sherry Subject: RE: Resubmittals for the March 18, 2008 CDB Meeting Sherry, P &R has no issues - conditions "met ". Thanksll Debbie O - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Watkins, Sherry Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2008 8:18 AM To: Buzzell, William; Chase, Susan; Dougall- Sides, Leslie; DRC Members; Gluski, Roberta; Hollander, Gwen; Hufford, Diane; James Miller; Josuns, Sarah; Lutz, Deb; Patni, Himanshu; Reid, Debbie; Rickard, Leonard; Shell, Heather C.; US Post Office (E- mail); Vo, Phuong; Yellin, Catherine Subject: Resubmittals for the March 18, 2008 CDB Meeting DRC Members, Plans for the following cases have been resubmitted for the March 18, 2008 CDB Meeting: FLD2007 -11035 1280 Cleveland Street Planner: Wayne Wells FLD2007 -12040 612 Druid Road Planner Robert Tefft I have placed one copy of the case resubmittal package on the cabinets outside of Room 216 in our office for your review (Please do not take it or any of the other copies as they are needed for the CDB members) Please review your comments /conditions for this cases in Permit Plan and determine if they are met. Whether the .conditions are "met" or still "not met," please affirm to me via email. Please have these cases reviewed by Friday, February 22, 2008 by 4:30PM. Thank you Sherry Watkins Administrative Analyst Planning Department 562 -4582 Wells, Wayne From: Doherty, Steve Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2008 3:47 PM To: Watkins, Sherry Cc: Wells, Wayne; Tefft, Robert; Elbo, Bennett; Fahey, Robert; Gluski, Roberta; Josuns, Sarah; Maran, Robert (Bob); Patni, Himanshu; Rice, Scott; Vo, Phuong Subject: RE: Resubmittals for the March 18, 2008 CDB Meeting FLD2OO7- 110351289 Cleveland St. Engineering condition related to requirement for right -of -way easement along Cleveland St. not met. Stormwater condition related to revised stormwater narrative not met. FLD2OO7 -12040 612 Druid Road All Pre CDB conditions have been met. Stephen L. Doherty Engineering Specialist I City of Clearwater Engineering steve.daherty@myclearwater.com 727.562.4773 - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Watkins, Sherry Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2008 8:18 AM To: Buzzell, William; Chase, Susan; Dougall- Sides, Leslie; DRC Members; Gluski, Roberta; Hollander, Gwen; Hufford, Diane; James Miller; Josuns, Sarah; Lutz, Deb; Patni, Himanshu; Reid, Debbie; Rickard, Leonard; Shell, Heather C.; US Post Office (E- mail); Vo, Phuong; Yellin, Catherine Subject: Resubmittals for the March 18, 2008 CDB Meeting DRC Members, Plans for the following cases have been resubmitted for the March 18, 2008 CDB Meeting: FLD20O7 -11035 1280 Cleveland Street Planner: Wayne Wells FLD20O7 -12040 612 Druid Road Planner Robert Tefft I have placed one copy of the case resubmittal package on the cabinets outside of Room 216 in our office for your review (Please do not take it or any of the other copies as they are needed for the CDB members) Please review your comments /conditions for this cases in Permit Plan and determine if they are met. Whether the conditions are "met" or still "not met," please affirm to me via email. Please have these cases reviewed by .Friday, February 22, 2008 by 4:3OPM. Thank you Sherry Watkins Administrative Analyst Planning Department 562 -4582 Wells, Wayne From: Watkins, Sherry Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2008 8:18 AM To: Buzzell, William; Chase, Susan; Dougall- Sides, Leslie; DRC Members; Gluski, Roberta; Hollander, Gwen; Hufford, Diane; James Miller; Josuns, Sarah; Lutz, Deb; Patni, Himanshu; Reid, Debbie; Rickard, Leonard; Shell, Heather C.; US Post Office (E- mail); Vo, Phuong; Yellin, Catherine Subject: Resubmittals for the March 18, 2008 CDB Meeting DRC Members, Plans for the following cases have been resubmitted for the March 18, 2008 CDB Meeting: FLD2007 -11035 1280 Cleveland Street Planner: Wayne Wells FLD2007 -12040 612 Druid Road Planner Robert Tefft I have placed one copy of the case resubmittal package on the cabinets outside of Room 216 in our office for your review (Please do not take it or any of the other copies as they are needed for the CDB members) Please review your comments /conditions for this cases in Permit Plan and determine if they are met. Whether the conditions are "met' or still "not met," please affirm to me via email. Please have these cases reviewed by Friday, February 22, 2008 by 4:30PM. Thank you Sherry Watkins Administrative Analyst Planning Department 562 -45 &2 1:00 P m Case Number: FLD2007 -11035 -- 1280 CLEVELAND ST' Owner(s): Gte Florida Inc � • C/O Property Tax Section Irving, Tx 75015 TELEPHONE: No Phone, FAX: No Fax, E -MAIL: No Email Applicant Verizon Corporate Real Estate 220 W Airfield Dr Dock E Mc Dfw Airport, Tx 75261 TELEPHONE: 972 - 615 -4039, FAX: No Fax, E -MAIL: No Email Representative: James Shimberg 100 N Tampa Street Tampa, F133602 TELEPHONE: 813- 293 -1912, FAX: 813- 314 -5108, E -MAIL: No Email Location: 3.33 acres located on the north side of Cleveland Street between Betty Lane and Fredrica Drive. Atlas Page: 287B Zoning District: D, Downtown Request: Flexible Development approval (1) for the Termination of Status of Nonconformity for Floor Area Ratio [FAR] (1.27 FAR proposed; where 0.55 FAR permitted today) and for building height (xx feet existing; where 50 -foot height permitted today) in the Downtown District (East Gateway Character District), under the provisions of Section 6 -109; (2) to permit the improvement of the existing site and parking areas for a "utilities /infrastructure facility" use in the Downtown District, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2- 903.C; and (3) to permit Nonresidential Off - Street Parking in the Medium High Density Residential (MHDR) District with deviations to reduce the side (north) setback from 10 to five feet (to pavement) and to allow the placement of landscaping on the inside of the buffer fence /wall along the north side of the property, as a Residential Infill Project, under the provisions of Section 2- 404.F. Proposed Use: Utility/infrastructure facilities Neighborhood Clearwater Neighborhoods Coalition Association(s): Clearwater, F133758 P O Box 8204 TELEPHONE: No Phone, FAX: No Fax, E -MAIL: No Email Neighborhood Skycrest Neighbors Association(s): Clearwater, F133755 121 N Crest Avenue TELEPHONE: No Phone, FAX: No Fax, E -MAIL: No Email Presenter: Wayne Wells, Planner III Attendees Included: City: 12/6/07 Wells, Thompson, Rice, Doherty, Albee, Keller, Glenn; 2/7/08 - Same, except Glenn; Applicant: 12/6/07 - James Shimberg, Robert Pergolizzi, Brian Gee, Jim Ford, Mike Patterson, Alan Murphy; 2/7/08 - Richard Harris, Patterson, Murphy The DRC reviewed this application with the following comments: General Engineering: Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Completion: 1. 180 -feet of public sidewalk along Cleveland Street is presently located within a 10 -foot wide strip of private property. Public utililites are also located in this portion of property. Applicant shall deed or dedicate to the City of Clearwater a 10 -foot right -of -way easement. At 2/07/08 DRC MEETING REPRESENTATIVE AGREED TO DISCUSS THIS CONDITION WITH PROPERTY OWNER. 2. Applicant shall submit 5 sets of as -built drawings that are signed and sealed by a professional engineer registered in the State of Florida. Construction Services Inspector will field inspect as -built drawings for accuracy. ACKNOWLEDGED General Note: DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. Environmental: Development Review Agenda - Thursday, February 7, 2008 - Page 20 DRC Aaio Agc da 1.1 A "one story block building" and a "wood frame addition" are shown on the survey in an area proposed as parking on the site plan. If buildings are to be demolished, an Asbestos Survey and Notification to Pinellas County Air Quality is required prior to demolition. Fire: 1 . No Issues Harbor Master: 1 . No issues. Legal: I . No issues. Land Resources: 1 . 11/16/07 -Once the proposed grades are established reasses the root prune requirements at tree 13 and 15. Root pruning can not occur within the root plate zone, 2.5' from tree 13 and 12' from tree 15. Revise prior to CDB. 1 /15 /08 -No root pruning should occur at tree #15 as no grade cuts appear to be proposed. Revise plans prior to building permit. 2. 11/16/07- Remove all #2 and below rated trees, see arborist report. Modify all plans prior to CDB. 1/15/08 -Show to remove tree #17 as it should be rated #2. Modify all plans prior to building permit. Landscaping: Development Review Agenda - Thursday, February 7, 2008 - Page 21 DRC Aaion Agcnda 1.1 Condition of Approval to be included in the Staff Report: That the shrubs along the north side of the existing detached dwelling attain six feet height within three years; 1/25/08 - WW a. Concerned with vehicular use area (VUA). Previously, based on 180 parking spaces provided, the proposed VUA was 56,368 s£ Now, based on 145 parking spaces provided, Sheet 1/1 indicates 65,368 sf, Sheet L -1 indicates 69,465 sf and Sheet L -2 indicates 56,368 sf. Which is correct? b. Sheet 1/1 indicates interior landscape area proposed of 5,113 sf, yet Sheet L -1 indicates 9,933 sf to be provided. Which is correct? 11/26/07 - WW Code requires a minimum interior landscape area of 10 percent of the vehicular use area (should be 5,637 sf required, based on 56,368 sf of vehicular use area). Site plan indicates proposed is 2,763 sf and 2 percent. With 2,763 sf, this should be 4.9 percent. Sheet 1/3 indicates total greenspace of 9,413 s£ Cannot count as interior landscape area perimeter buffers in the MHDR District. Revise calculations. If it the applicant's proposal to not provide the required interior landscape area, then the application must include such as a reduction. Alternately, if the interior landscape area were to be placed in other appropriate locations where the design, character, location and/or materials are demonstrably more attractive than minimum landscape requirements, then a Comprehensive Landscape Program application must be also submitted, complying with Code criteria. Sheet L -2 - Along the north property line you are creating a five -foot wide landscape buffer. You are proposing to plant 18 bald cypress trees within this buffer. Replace with red cedar trees, 10 -foot tall and 2.5 -inch caliper. 1/28/08 - WW In addition to the Walter's Vibumam Trees proposed between the northern property line adjacent to the detached dwelling that is not part of this application and the adjacent parking lot, install shrubs for screening the lower views of the parking lot, to comply with the following Downtown Design Guideline: "Parking lot design that minimizes negative impacts such as light glare, exhaust fumes, noise and undesirable views." 11/27/08 - WW While there is no required perimeter buffer required in the Downtown District, the detached dwelling parcel fronting on Fredrica Avenue within the MHDR District should be buffered from this use through trees and shrubs (shrubs to grow to six feet in height within three years). Alternately, potentially, a six -foot high solid fence or wall could be substituted, with shrubs on the Verizon side of the fence /wall. 1/30/08 - WW Below comment erroneously said the proposed QV trees were 3 -inch caliper. Prior plan indicated 3" BDH. Code requires caliper, not DBH. Revise QV to 10 -foot tall and 2.5 -inch caliper. 11/27/07 - WW Plant Material List indicates the QV to be 16 -foot tall and 3 -inch caliper. For this caliper size, 16 -foot tall seems excessively tall. Code minimum at time of planting is 10 -foot tall and 2.5 -inch caliper. Sheet L -2 - Instead of CE - Silver Buttonwood along the south building foundation, suggest rather weeping yaupon holly (Ilex vomitoria'Pendula'). 1/28/08 - WW Sheet 1/1 - Plans are unclear if the front of the northernmost parking space row is provided with vertical curbing. Increase line width if so. 11/29/07 - WW Must provide vertical curb along the front of the parking spaces facing Fredrica Avenue north of the retention pond, the edges of the terminal landscape island north of this row of spaces and along the front of the northernmost parking space rows. Development Review Agenda - Thursday, February 7, 2008 - Page 22 DRC Action Ag.idz 1.1 g . Sheet L -2 indicates a total of 82 trees required, which when multiplied by 2.5" caliper produces 210" of trees to be planted (not 200" as indicated; check math). However, you have added the 84" of tree replacement to the 200" (should be 210 ") of tree inch required to come up with 284" (revised math would be 294 ") required to be planted. Your math is in error, in that you don't add 200" (should be 210 ") and 84 ", but rather the 84" of replacement tree is INCLUDED in the total tree inch required (the 210 "). Revise. Suggest, as a means of bringing the total number of tree inch down to the required amount, to cut down on the number of trees along the north property line to be planted to that required by Code at one tree per 35 feet. Parks and Recreation: 1 . No issues - project in CRA. Stormwater: 1 . The following shall be addressed prior to review by the Community Development Board: 1. Provide a grading and drainage plan showing the proposed grades of the new parking lot. 02/07/08 ACKNOWLEGED BY APPLICANT. 2. Provide drainage narrative and calculations addressing the increased impervious area. Per the telephone conversation among the Engineer, Richard Harris, Bob Maran, and Phuong Vo on 1/30/08, the increase impervious area may be addressed by payment in lieu option. 02/07/08 ACKNOWLEGED BY APPLICANT. 3. It appears that the proposed 24'x10' dumpster enclosure is located on top of an existing stormwater inlet; please relocate the inlet to the west of the proposed dumpster or provide a different location for this dumpster. 02/07/2008 APPLICANT AGREED TO RELOCATE . INLET. 4. The existing grate inlet located near the proposed concrete flume to the east shall not be blocked by the proposed curb and wheel stop. 02/07/08 ACKNOWLEGED BY APPLICANT. 5. When the northern portion is being redeveloped, the City will require either an on -site new retention pond with new outfall to a stormwater pipe in Fredrica Drive or an agreement between the two owners allowing the existing pond and private stormwater facilities to be used for the northern portion and allowing for pond maintenance. 02/07/08 ACKNOWLEGED BY APPLICANT. NOTE: If the proposed development of the northerly property necessitates infrastructure modifications to satisfy site - specific stormwater outfall needs the modifications shall be completed by the applicant and at their expense. 02/07/08 ACKNOWLEGED BY APPLICANT. The following shall be addressed prior to the issuance of building permit. 1. All storm pipes and storm structures shall be cleaned and made functional. 02/07/08 ACKNOWLEGED BY APPLICANT. 2. Applicant shall acknowledge in writing that if the northern portion at the later time being redeveloped and has its own storm system and retention pond on site, the owner of the southern portion shall tie the existing storm system into the existing pond. (Currently, the southern portion's storm system ties directly into the City's system) 02/07/08 ACKNOWLEGED BY APPLICANT. 3. The grading plan shall show the complete storm sewer system. 02/07/08 ACKNOWLEGED BY APPLICANT. 4. Provide an approved SWFWMD permit or letter of exemption. 02/07/08 ACKNOWLEGED BY APPLICANT. General notes: 02/07/08 ACKNOWLEGED BY APPLICANT. 1. DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. 2. At building permit application, applicant shall submit all documentation again for review Solid Waste: Development Review Agenda - Thursday, February 7, 2008 - Page 23 DRC Action Agcnda I.I 1/14/08 - TJG Has the question about location of the dumpster been resolved with Planning and Engineering? 12/6/07 - WW It was discussed at the DRC meeting the location of the existing dumpster for two dumpsters. Any relocation on -site will need to provide an enclosure meeting City Code for the two dumpsters acceptable to Solid Waste, making sure the solid waste truck can access the enclosure and leave in a safe manner. 11/21/07 - TJG How is Solid Waste handled? Traffic Engineering: I , The accessible route from handicap parking spaces to a building's accessible entrance shall be exclusive of the 24' wide drive aisle. (Note: Ramp to the accessible entrance is near the west property line. Crossing should me moved this direction.) 02/07/08 ACKNOWLEGED BY APPLICANT. 2. Provide an accessible route from a building's accessible entrance to a public sidewalk compliant with Florida Accessibility Code for Building Construction Chapter 11, Section 11- 4.3.2. 02/07/08 ACKNOWLEGED BY APPLICANT. 3. A tall brick enclosure located in the sight - visibility triangle on the soulth side of the property entrance on Fredrica shall be removed. This structure exceeds the 30 -inch height maximum per Community Development Code Section 3 -904. 02/07/08 ACKNOWLEGED BY APPLICANT. Planning: The above to be addressed prior to a Community Development Board (CDB) hearing. The following shall be addressed prior to the issuance of building permit. 1. Provide handicapped parking stall and sign details compliant with City standards. http:// www. myclearwater. com/ gov/ depts/ pwa/ engin /Production/stddet/index.asp 02/07/08 ACKNOWLEGED BY APPLICANT. General Note(s): 02/07/08 ACKNOWLEGED BY APPLICANT. 1) Applicant shall comply with the current Transportation Impact Fee Ordinance and fee schedule and paid prior to a Certificate of Occupancy (C.O.). 2) DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. Development Review Agenda - Thursday, February 7, 2008 - Page 24 DRC Action Agenda 1.1 1/30/08 - WW No response to east side of Betty Lane. 11/26/07 - WW Existing overhead utility lines run along the east side of Betty Lane and down the "middle" of the subject property. Section 3 -911 requires the undergrounding of these overhead utility lines. Such undergrounding of these existing overhead utility lines appears feasible. 2. 1/30/08 - WW Revise Page 1 of the application to 3.33 acres for Parcel Size (acres) and fill in the Parcel Size (square feet) as 145,135 square feet. 11/25/07 - WW On Page 1 of the application the parcel size is listed as 5.6 acres, yet on the site plan it is listed as 3.21 acres. Which is correct? 3 . 1/30/08 & 11/26/07 - WW In lieu of providing building elevations of the existing building, provide color photos of all four sides of the building. 4. 1/30/08 & 11/27/07 - WW On Page 6 of 7 of the application, must complete the following: Acknowledgement of fire flow calculations /water study requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following): Fire Flow Calculations/Water Study is included. Fire Flow Calculations/Water Study is not required. 5 . On the north side of the building, there is a handicap ramp that stretches out to the sight visibility triangle on the south side of the southern middle driveway. The plans indicate a handicap path from the hanidcap parking spaces across this southern drive aisle to the building, but would be to the side of an elevated ramp. The accessible path needs to be relocated to access the bottom of the ramp, which is about 20 feet back from the property line at the end of the visibility triangle. Revise. 6. 1/30/08 & 11/27/07 - WW On Page 6 of 7 of the application, must complete the following: Acknowledgement of traffic impact study requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following): Traffic Impact Study is included. The study must include a summary table of pre- and post - development levels of service for all roadway legs and each turning movement at all intersections identified in the Scoping Meeting. Traffic Impact Study is not required. 7. Sheets 1 /1, L -2 and L -3 - Plans do not indicate the removal of the pavement and base material within the right -of -way of Betty Lane west of the equipment service area. Likewise, remove concrete and dumpster enclosure within the right -of -way north of this equipment service area. Indicate sod to be planted within the right -of -way where this pavement/concrete is removed. Revise. 8 . 1/30/08 - WW The plan does not indicate screening of the equipment service area by landscaping or a three -foot high fence or wall along Betty Lane (see Page 90 of the Downtown Design Guidelines). Prefer cutting back the pavement of the equipment service area a minimum of five feet from the front property line along Betty Lane and installing landscaping for screening to be consistent with rest of property. Revise. 11/27/07 - WW Comply with Downtown Design Guidelines of the Downtown Redevelopment Plan, including the requirement to screen parking from street rights -of -way (see page 84 of the Downtown Redevelopment Plan). 9. 1/30/08 & 11/27/07 - WW Revise the Written Description, Background, first line to indicate Fredrica Avenue (not Street). Development Review Agenda - Thursday, February 7, 2008 - Page 25 DRC Action Agmida I.1 10 . 1/30/08 - WW A new double dumpster enclosure is indicated to be located at the east end of the southern drive aisle adjacent to the east property line. The plans do not indicate that the existing dumpster enclosure that is partially within the Betty Lane right -of -way is to be removed. Revise. 12/2/07 - WW The existing dumpster enclosure on the west side of the site requires truck pickup in two directions (from the north and from the south). This dumpster enclosure is located within the right -of -way of Betty Lane. Relocate it on -site to a location and with a design meeting City requirements acceptable to the Solid Waste Department. 11 . 1/30/08 & 11/27/07 - WW Page 7 of the application, Affidavit to Authorize Agent, need to indicate under Douglas Dale's name his position title in General Telephone Company of Florida (president, secretary, etc.). 12. 1/30/08 & 12/3/07 - WW On Page 1 of the application the project valuation has been listed as "N /A ". However, there will be a cost associated with constructing the proposed improvements. Recommend inserting a reasonable project valuation. 13 . Equipment service area on west side of the building - Unclear why it must be 22.3 feet in width (from Betty Lane property line) and why it must go all the way to Cleveland Street. Cut back to what is necessary or provide justification as to why it must be the proposed dimensions (see other Zoning comment regarding screening of this area). Application Narrative - Provide a description of the equipment service area, including the need for such (any necessary enlightening background information) and how it will function. 14. 1/30/08 & 11/27/07 - WW The purpose of this request is to be able to sell off the northern portion of the site for other development. As such, the following will be included as a condition of approval: That, prior to the submission for a site development building permit to effect the site changes, a Release of Unity of Title and Minor Lot Adjustment application be submitted to and approved by the Planning Department. 15 . Under the East Gateway District of the Downtown Redevelopment Plan, the maximum floor area ratio (FAR) is 0.55 and the maximum height is 50 feet. The proposed FAR exceeds the maximum of 0.55, which is deemed to be nonconforming to that permitted under the Downtown Redevelopment Plan. Additionally, while the actual building height is NOT provided, the application previously noted that the height exceeds the maximum of 50 feet. Provide the existing height. Assumed to be greater than 50 feet in height, which is also nonconforming to that permitted under the Downtown Redevelopment Plan. The application must also request a Termination of Status of Nonconformity for building height (in addition to FAR), under the provisions of Section 6 -109. For the Termination portion of this request, need to provide written responses to the requirements under Section 6- 109.C: a. Perimeter buffers conforming to the requirements of section 3- 1202(C) shall be installed. b. Off - street parking lots shall be improved to meet the landscaping standards established in section 3- 1202(D). c. Any nonconforming sign, outdoor lighting or other accessory structure or accessory use located on the lot shall be terminated, removed or brought into conformity with this development code. d. The comprehensive landscaping and comprehensive sign programs may be used to satisfy the requirements of this section. 16. There is an "L or U" shaped wall approximately six feet tall within the sight visibility triangle at the parking area off Fredrica Avenue. This wall is within the visibility triangle and should either be cut down in height to a maximum of 36- inches or removed and replaced with landscaping to screen the parking area. Note: Fredrica Avenue will soon be changed to a two -way street (not one -way as present). Development Review Agenda - Thursday, February 7, 2008 - Page 26 DRC Action Agenda 1.1 17 . Written Description (Revised) -Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project Application - bottom of Page 1 - Remove statement "A detailed parking study is attached to this application" and recommend not including the parking study to the CDB. Top of Page 2 - Revise the second sentence from "The parking study..." to "A parking study..." Due to the Downtown Redevelopment Plan (Plan) standards for the East Gateway District, the Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project Application also includes a request for Termination of Status of Nonconformity for Floor Area Ratio and Height ( ?? - see other Planning comments). The Written Description should include a narrative describing the proposal. in light of the Plan requirements for this portion of the request. 18. Written Description (Revised) - Residential Infill Project Application - Page 1 - In conjuction with other Landscaping comments, unclear if minimum 10% interior landscaping is being provided or not ( ? ?). The interior landscaping is a function of the vehicular use area, irrespective of the zoning of the parking lot. 19. Revise the second line of the title "Revised Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project Application, Section D. Written Submittal Requirements (Code Section 3- 913.A)" to responses to 'Revised Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project Application, General Applicability Criteria (Code Section 3- 913.A) ". 20. Response to General Applicability Criteria #1 - The existing Utilities /Infrastructure Facility is NOT consistent with the Downtown Redevelopment Plan East Gateway District standards for FAR and height, thus the reason a portion of this request is for the Termination of Status of Nonconformity. Need to readdress how this response is written, in light of the nonconformity and the request to terminate its nonconforming status. Discussion might involve how long this use has been here, its future use and potentially how landscaping is being employed to help soften the scale and bulk of the building. Also discuss parking lot and landscaping improvements in relation to adjacent properties. 21 . Response to General Applicability Criteria #3 - Revise to NOT discuss the potential development of the northern portion of the overall property that is desired to be cut off from that which will be retained by Verizon. I would discuss removal of parking from the right -of -way, reworking the driveways to meet current City Codes (including the ability of the Fire Department to access the property), reducing pedestrian/vehicular conflicts through improved driveways and sidewalks, improving handicap accessibililty, separation of pedestrians and vehicles by landscaping, etc. 22. Response to General Applicability Criteria #4 - Remove the comment that the parking study is "attached" as it is not necessary to attach such. I would discuss the realignment of the driveways for improved access, including the Fire Department, improved separation of vehicles and pedestrians. improved pedestrian access through repaired sidewalks and improved handicap accessibility. 23 . Response to General Applicability Criteria #5 - Revise to NOT discuss the potential development of the northern portion of the overall property that is desired to be cut off from that which will be retained by Verizon as the primary response to this criteria. The existing Utilities /Infrastructure Facility is NOT consistent with the Downtown Redevelopment Plan East Gateway District standards for FAR and height, thus the reason a portion of this request is for the Termination of Status of Nonconformity. Need to readdress how this response is written, in light of the nonconformity and the request to terminate its nonconforming status. Speak to the issue of community character of the immediate vicinity around this property. 24. Response to General Applicability Criteria #6 - The existing Utilities /Infrastructure Facility is NOT consistent with the Downtown Redevelopment Plan East Gateway District standards for FAR and height, thus the reason a portion of this request is for the Termination of Status of Nonconformity. Need to address how this proposed revised site ( Verizon) minimizes negative visual effects on adjacent properties (improved through installation of proposed landscaping). 25 . Response to Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project Criteria #1 - The existing Utilities /Infrastructure Facility is NOT consistent with the Downtown Redevelopment Plan East Gateway District standards for FAR and height, thus the reason a portion of this request is for the Termination of Status of Nonconformity. Need to readdress how this response is written, in light of the nonconformity and the request to terminate its nonconforming status. Deviation is necessary through the Termination process to retain the existing facility in its present size and height in order to allow for the sale of the northern portion of the existing property for a residential use. Development Review Agenda - Thursday, February 7, 2008 - Page 27 DRC Action Agenda 1.1 26 . Response to Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project Criteria #2 - The existing Utilities /Infrastructure Facility is NOT consistent with the Downtown Redevelopment Plan East Gateway District standards for FAR and height, thus the reason a portion of this request is for the Termination of Status of Nonconformity. Need to address how this proposal furthers the District Vision and Development Patterns of the East Gateway District by allowing the retaining of the existing facility in its present size and height in order to allow for the sale of the northern portion of the existing property for a residential use. 27 . Response to Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project Criteria #3 - Need to add to this response how approval of this application will provide for the development of the northern area to be sold off for residential use. 28. Response to Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project Criteria #5 - The existing Utilities /Infrastructure Facility is listed in the Downtown District as a Level 1, Flexible Standard Development (FLS) use. Need to address in the response compliance with Criterial #5a and c (in relation to to retaining the existing facility in its present size and height in order to allow for the sale of the northern portion of the existing property for a residential use). 29. Response to Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project Criteria #6 - Need to address how this proposal is in compliance with all of the design objectives of this criteria. 30. Response to Residential Infill Project Criteria #1 - Need to include in the response how this existing /proposed parking lot in the MHDR District cannot be constructed without the deviations listed in the request (see above, written by staff). 31 . Response to Residential Infill Project Criteria #2 - Response should include how site and landscaping improvements could improve property values of abutting properties. I am not aware of any additional drainage facilities being constructed as part of this application for the parking lot in the MHDR District (last sentence). 32. Response to Residential Infill Project Criteria #4 - Need to include in the response that this nonresidential parking lot is existing, not proposed, and is being improved to allow for the sale of the northern portion of Verizon property for a future residential use. 33 . Criteria #3 for Nonresidential Off - Street Parking in the MHDR District requires a solid fence or wall along the proposed north property line and along the south property line adjacent to the detached dwelling outparcel (22 Fredrica Avenue) a minimum of four feet in height (must be reduced to three feet in height within the front setback along Betty Lane and Fredrica Avenue. Indicate compliance on the plans. This same section requires the landscaping to be placed on the outside of the fence /wall, which I strongly recommend requesting the landscaping be placed on the inside of the fence /wall as a deviation to this criteria (staff will support such deviation). 34. Sheet 1/1 -Revise Land Use Summary for Setbacks (MHDR District) for Side -Proposed to Parking from "5 feet (N & E)" to "5 feet (N & S) ". Other: No Comments Notes: To be placed on the 3/18/08 CDB agenda, submit 15 collated copies of the revised plans & application material addressing all above departments' comments by noon, 2/19/08. Packets shall be collated, folded and stapled as appropriate. Development Review Agenda - Thursday, February 7, 2008 - Page 28 DRC Action Agenda 1.1 Wells, Wayne From: Doherty, Steve Sent: Monday, February 11, 2008 4:03 PM To: Watkins, Sherry; Thompson, Neil; Molter, Molly; Tefft, Robert; Wells, Wayne; Elbo, Bennett; Fahey, Robert; Gluski, Roberta; Josuns, Sarah; Maran, Robert (Bob); Patni, Himanshu; Rice, Scott; Vo, Phuong Subject: FEB 07 DRC I have finalized Engineering review of these cases. Please note the following holds: FLS2007- 12054Stormwater and Traffic Engineering holds need to be met prior to issuance of a D.O. FLS2007 -12055 No holds FLS2008 -01001 No holds FLS2008 -01002 Stormwater and Engineering holds need to be met prior to issuance of a D.O. FLS2007 -01003 No holds FLD2007 -11035 Stormwater and Traffic Engineering holds need to be met prior to review by C.D.B. FLD2007 -12040 Traffic Engineering holds need to be met prior to review by C.D.B. FLD2008 -01001 Traffic Engineering holds need to be met prior to review by C.D.B. ♦din,❑ nLE O� 4 ❑,^�1n,0�❑^ Engineering Specialist 1 City of Clearwater Engineering steve.doherty@myclearwater.com 727.562.4773 1.00 pm Case Number: FLD2007 -11035 -- 1280 CLEVELAND ST Z• 7l, Owner(s): Gte Florida Inc P900W C/O Property Tax Section Irving, Tx 75015 TELEPHONE: No Phone, FAX: No Fax, E -MAIL: No Email Applicant Verizon Corporate Real Estate 220 W Airfield Dr Dock E Mc Dfw Airport, Tx 75261 TELEPHONE: 972 - 615 -4039, FAX: No Fax, E -MAIL: No Email Representative: James Shimberg 100 N Tampa Street Tampa, F133602 TELEPHONE: 813 - 293 -1912, FAX: 813 - 314 -5108, E -MAIL: No Email Location: 3.33 acres located on the north side of Cleveland Street between Betty Lane and Fredrica Drive. Atlas Page: 287B Zoning District: D, Downtown . Request: Flexible Development approval (1) for the Termination of Status of Nonconformity for Floor Area Ratio [FAR] (1.27 FAR proposed; where 0.55 FAR permitted today) and for building height (xx feet existing; where 50 -foot height permitted today) in the Downtown District (East Gateway Character District), under the provisions of Section 6 -109; (2) to permit the improvement of the existing site and parking areas for a "utilities /infrastructure facility" use in the Downtown District, as a Comprehensive lnfill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2- 903.C; and (3) to permit Nonresidential Off - Street Parking in the Medium High Density Residential (MHDR) District with deviations to reduce the side (north) setback from 10 to five feet (to pavement) and to allow the placement of landscaping on the inside of the buffer fence /wall along the north side of the property, as a Residential Infill Project, under the provisions of Section 2- 404.F. Proposed Use: Utility/infrastructure facilities Neighborhood Clearwater Neighborhoods Coalition Association(s): Clearwater, Fl 33758 P O Box 8204 TELEPHONE: No Phone, FAX: No Fax, E -MAIL: No Email Neighborhood Skycrest Neighbors Association(s): Clearwater, Fl 33755 121 N Crest Avenue TELEPHONE: No Phone, FAX: No Fax, E -MAIL: No Email Presenter: Wayne Wells, Planner III Attendees Included: City: 12/6/07 Wells, Thompson, Rice, Doherty, Albee, Keller, Glenn; 2/7/08 - Same; Applicant: 12/6/07 - James Shimberg, Robert Pergolizzi, Brian Gee, Jim Ford, Mike Patterson, Alan Murphy; 2/7/08 - Shimberg, Pergolizzi, Gee, Ford, Patterson, Murphy The DRC reviewed this application with the following comments: General Engineering: 1 . Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy: 1. 180 -feet of public sidewalk along Cleveland Street is presently located within a 10 -foot wide strip of private property. Public utililites are also located in this portion of property. Applicant shall deed or dedicate to the City of Clearwater a 10 -foot right -of -way easement. 2. Applicant shall submit 5 sets of as -built drawings that are signed and sealed by a professional engineer registered in the State of Florida. Construction Services Inspector will field inspect as -built drawings for accuracy. General Note: DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. Environmental: A 'one story block building" and a "wood frame addition" are shown on the survey in an area proposed as parking.on the site plan. If buildings are to be demolished, an Asbestos Survey and Notification to Pinellas County Air Quality is required prior to demolition. Development Review Agenda - Thursday, February 7, 2008 - Page 23 DRC Action Agenda 1.1 Fire: I . No Issues Harbor Master: 1 . No issues. Legal: I . No issues. Land Resources: I . 11/16/07 -Once the proposed grades are established reasses the root prune requirements at tree 13 and 15. Root pruning can not occur within the root plate zone, 2.5' from tree 13 and 12' from tree 15. Revise prior to CDB. 1 /15 /08 -No root pruning should occur at tree #15 as no grade cuts appear to be proposed. Revise plans prior to building permit. 2. 11/16/07- Remove all #2 and below rated trees, see arborist report. Modify all plans prior to CDB. 1/15/08 -Show to remove tree #17 as it should be rated #2. Modify all plans prior to building permit. Landscaping: .Development Review Agenda - Thursday, February 7, 2008 - Page 24 DRC Aaiun Agwd, 1.1 Condition of Approval to be included in the Staff Report: That the shrubs along the north side of the existing detached dwelling attain six feet height within three years; 1/25/08 - WW a. Concerned with vehicular use area (VUA). Previously, based on 180 parking spaces provided, the proposed VUA was 56,368 sf. Now, based on 145 parking spaces provided, Sheet 1/1 indicates 65,368 sf, Sheet L -1 indicates 69,465 sf and Sheet L -2 indicates 56,368 sf. Which is correct? b. Sheet 1/1 indicates interior landscape area proposed of 5,113 sf, yet Sheet L -1 indicates 9,933 sf to be provided. Which is correct? 11/26/07 - WW Code requires a minimum interior landscape area of 10 percent of the vehicular use area (should be 5,637 sf required, based on 56,368 sf of vehicular use area). Site plan indicates proposed is 2,763 sf and 2 percent. With 2,763 sf, this should be 4.9 percent. Sheet 1/3 indicates total greenspace of 9,413 sf. Cannot count as interior landscape area perimeter buffers in the MHDR District. Revise calculations. If it the applicant's proposal to not provide the required interior landscape area, then the application must include such as a reduction. Alternately, if the interior landscape area were to be placed in other appropriate locations where the design, character, location and/or materials are demonstrably more attractive than minimum landscape requirements, then a Comprehensive Landscape Program application must be also submitted, complying with Code criteria. Sheet L -2 - Along the north property line you are creating a five -foot wide landscape buffer. You are proposing to plant 18 bald cypress trees within this buffer. Replace with red cedar trees, 10 -foot tall and 2.5 -inch caliper. 1/28/08 - WW In addition to the Walter's Vibumam Trees proposed between the northern property line adjacent to the detached dwelling that is not part of this application and the adjacent parking lot, install shrubs for screening the lower views of the parking lot, to comply with the following Downtown Design Guideline: "Parking lot design that minimizes negative impacts such as light glare, exhaust fumes, noise and undesirable views." 11/27/08 - WW While there is no required perimeter buffer required in the Downtown District, the detached dwelling parcel fronting on Fredrica Avenue within the MHDR District should be buffered from this use through trees and shrubs (shrubs to grow to six feet in height within three years). Alternately, potentially, a six -foot high solid fence or wall could be substituted, with shrubs on the Verizon side of the fence /wall. 1/30/08 - WW Below comment erroneously said the proposed QV trees were 3 -inch caliper. Prior plan indicated 3" BDH. Code requires caliper, not DBH. Revise QV to 10 -foot tall and 2.5 -inch caliper. 11/27/07 - WW Plant Material List indicates the QV to be 16 -foot tall and 3 -inch caliper. For this caliper size, 16 -foot tall seems excessively tall. Code minimum at time of planting is 10 -foot tall and 2.5 -inch caliper. Sheet L -2 - Instead of CE - Silver Buttonwood along the south building foundation, suggest rather weeping yaupon holly (Ilex vomitoria'Pendula'). 1/28/08 - WW Sheet 1/1 - Plans are unclear if the front of the northernmost parking space row is provided with vertical curbing. Increase line width if so. 11/29/07 - WW Must provide vertical curb along the front of the parking spaces facing Fredrica Avenue north of the retention pond, the edges of the terminal landscape island north of this row of spaces and along the front of the northernmost parking space rows. Development Review Agenda - Thursday, February 7, 2008 - Page 25 URC Adion Agenda 1.1 8 . Sheet L -2 indicates a total of 82 trees required, which when multiplied by 2.5" caliper produces 210" of trees to be planted (not 200" as indicated; check math). However, you have added the 84" of tree replacement to the 200" (should be 210 ") of tree inch required to come up with 284" (revised math would be 294 ") required to be planted. Your math is in error, in that you don't add 200" (should be 210 ") and 84 ", but rather the 84" of replacement tree is INCLUDED in the total tree inch required (the 210 "). Revise. Suggest, as a means of bringing the total number of tree inch down to the required amount, to cut down on the number of trees along the north property line to be planted to that required by Code at one tree per 35 feet. Parks and Recreation: Stormwater: Solid Waste: No issues - project in CRA. The following shall be addressed prior to review by the Community Development Board: 1. Provide a grading and drainage plan showing the proposed grades of the new parking lot. 2. Provide drainage narrative and calculations addressing the increased impervious area. Per the telephone conversation among the Engineer, Richard Harris, Bob Maran, and Phuong Vo on 1/30/08, the increase impervious area.may be addressed by payment in lieu option. 3. It appears that the proposed 24'x10' dumpster enclosure is located on top of an existing stormwater inlet; please relocate the inlet to the west of the proposed dumpster or provide a different location for this dumpster. 4. The existing grate inlet located near the proposed concrete flume to the east shall not be blocked by the proposed curb and wheel stop. 5. When the northern portion is being redeveloped, the City will require either an on -site new retention pond with new outfall to a stormwater pipe in Fredrica Drive or an agreement between the two owners allowing the existing pond and private stormwater facilities to be used for the northern portion and allowing for pond maintenance. NOTE: If the proposed development of the northerly property necessitates infrastructure modifications to satisfy site - specific stormwater outfall needs the modifications shall be completed by the applicant and at their expense. The following shall be addressed prior to the issuance of building permit. 1. All storm pipes and storm structures shall be cleaned and made functional. 2. Applicant shall acknowledge in writing that if the northern portion at the later time being redeveloped and has its own storm system and retention pond on site, the owner of the southern portion shall tie the existing storm system into the existing pond. (Currently, the southern portion's storm system ties directly into the City's system) 3. The grading plan shall show the complete storm sewer system. 4. Provide an approved SWFWMD permit or letter of exemption. General note: 1. DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. 2. At building permit application, applicant shall submit all documentation again for review 1/14/08 - TJG Has the question about location of the dumpster been resolved with Planning and Engineering? 12/6/07 - WW It was discussed at the DRC meeting the location of the existing dumpster for two dumpsters. Any relocation on -site will need to provide an enclosure meeting City Code for the two dumpsters acceptable to Solid Waste, making sure the solid waste truck can access the enclosure and leave in a safe manner. 11/21/07 - TJG How is Solid Waste handled? Traffic Engineering: Development Review Agenda - Thursday, February 7, 2008 - Page 26 DRC Aclion Ag .da I.1 Planning: The accessible route from handicap parking spaces to a building's accessible entrance shall be exclusive of the 24' wide drive aisle. (Note: Ramp to the accessible entrance is near the west property line. Crossing should me moved this direction.) 2. Provide an accessible route from a building's accessible entrance to a public sidewalk compliant with Florida Accessibility Code for Building Construction Chapter 11, Section 11- 4.3.2. 3. A tall brick enclosure located in the sight - visibility triangle on the soulth side of the property entrance on Fredrica shall be removed. This structure exceeds the 30 -inch height maximum per Community Development Code Section 3 -904. The above to be addressed prior to a Community Development Board (CDB) hearing. The following shall be addressed prior to the issuance of building permit. 1. Provide handicapped parking stall and sign details compliant with City standards. http: / /www.myclearwater. com/ gov/ depts/ pwa /engin/Production/stddet/index. asp General Note(s): 1) Applicant shall comply with the current Transportation Impact Fee Ordinance and fee schedule and paid prior to a Certificate of Occupancy (C.O.). 2) DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. Development Review Agenda - Thursday, February 7, 2008 - Page 27 DRC Action Agenda 1.1 I . 1/30/08 - WW No response to east side of Betty Lane. 11/26/07 - WW Existing overhead utility lines run along the east side of Betty Lane and down the "middle" of the subject property. Section 3 -911 requires the undergrounding of these overhead utility lines. Such undergrounding of these existing overhead utility lines appears feasible. 2. 1/30/08 - WW Revise Page 1 of the application to 3.33 acres for Parcel Size (acres) and fill in the Parcel Size (square feet) as 145,135 square feet. 11/25/07 - WW On Page 1 of the application the parcel size is listed as 5.6 acres, yet on the site plan it is listed as 3.21 acres. Which is correct? 3 . 1/30/08 & 11/26/07 - WW In lieu of providing building elevations of the existing building, provide color photos of all four sides of the building. 4. 1/30/08 & 11/27/07 - WW On Page 6 of 7 of the application, must complete the following: Acknowledgement of fire flow calculations /water study requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following): Fire Flow Calculations/Water Study is included. Fire Flow Calculations/Water Study is not required. 5. On the north side of the building, there is a handicap ramp that stretches out to the sight visibility triangle on the south side of the southern middle driveway. The.plans indicate a handicap path from the hanidcap parking spaces across this southern drive aisle to the building, but would be to the side of an elevated ramp. The accessible path needs to be relocated to access the bottom of the ramp, which is about 20 feet back from the property line at the end of the visibility triangle. Revise. 6. 1/30/08 & 11/27/07 - WW On Page 6 of 7 of the application, must complete the following: Acknowledgement of traffic impact study requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following): _Traffic Impact Study is included. The study must include a summary table of pre- and post - development levels of service for all roadway legs and each turning movement at all intersections identified in the Scoping Meeting. _Traffic Impact Study is not required. 7. Sheets 1/1, L -2 and L -3 - Plans do not indicate the removal of the pavement and base material within the right -of -way of Betty Lane west of the equipment service area. Likewise, remove concrete and dumpster enclosure within the right -of -way north of this equipment service area. Indicate sod to be planted within the right -of -way where this pavement/concrete is removed. Revise. 1/30/08 - WW The plan does not indicate screening of the equipment service area by landscaping or a three -foot high fence or wall along Betty Lane (see Page 90 of the Downtown Design Guidelines). Prefer cutting back the pavement of the equipment service area a minimum of five feet from the front property line along Betty Lane and installing landscaping for screening to be consistent with rest of property. Revise. 11/27/07 - WW Comply with Downtown Design Guidelines of the Downtown Redevelopment Plan, including the requirement to screen parking from street rights -of -way (see page 84 of the Downtown Redevelopment Plan). 1/30/08 & 11/27/07 - WW Revise the Written Description, Background, first line to indicate Fredrica Avenue (not Street). Development Review Agenda - Thursday, February 7, 2008 - Page 28 DRC Action Agenda 1.1 10 . 1/30/08 - WW A new double dumpster enclosure is indicated to be located at the east end of the southern drive aisle adjacent to the east property line. The plans do not indicate that the existing dumpster enclosure that is partially within the Betty Lane right -of -way is to be removed. Revise. 12/2/07 - WW The existing dumpster enclosure on the west side of the site requires truck pickup in two directions (from the north and from the south). This dumpster enclosure is located within the right -of -way of Betty Lane. Relocate it on -site to a location and with a design meeting City requirements acceptable to the Solid Waste Department. 11 . 1/30/08 & 11/27/07 - WW Page 7 of the application, Affidavit to Authorize Agent, need to indicate under Douglas Dale's name his position title in General Telephone Company of Florida (president, secretary, etc.). 12. 1/30/08 & 12/3/07 - WW On Page 1 of the application the project valuation has been listed as "N /A ". However, there will be a cost associated with constructing the proposed improvements. Recommend inserting a reasonable project valuation. 13. Equipment service area on west side of the building - Unclear why it must be 22.3 feet in width (from Betty Lane property line) and why it must go all the way to Cleveland Street. Cut back to what is necessary or provide justification as to why it must be the proposed dimensions (see other Zoning comment regarding screening of this area). Application Narrative - Provide a description of the equipment service area, including the need for such (any necessary enlightening background information) and how it will function. 14. 1/30/08 & 11/27/07 - WW The purpose of this request is to be able to sell off the northern portion of the site for other development. As such, the following will be included as a condition of approval: That, prior to the submission for a site development building permit to effect the site changes, a Release of Unity of Title and Minor Lot Adjustment application be submitted to and approved by the Planning Department. 15. Under the East Gateway District of the Downtown Redevelopment Plan, the maximum floor area ratio (FAR) is 0.55 and the maximum height is 50 feet. The proposed FAR exceeds the maximum of 0.55, which is deemed to be nonconforming to that permitted under the Downtown Redevelopment Plan. Additionally, while the actual building height is NOT provided, the application previously noted that the height exceeds the maximum of 50 feet. Provide the existing height. Assumed to be greater than 50 feet in height, which is also nonconforming to that permitted under the Downtown Redevelopment Plan. The application must also request a Termination of Status of Nonconformity for building height (in addition to FAR), under the provisions of Section 6 -109. For the Termination portion of this request, need to provide written responses to the requirements under Section 6- 109.C: a. Perimeter buffers conforming to the requirements of section 3- 1202(C) shall be installed. b. Off - street parking lots shall be improved to meet the landscaping standards established in section 3- 1202(D). c. Any nonconforming sign, outdoor lighting or other accessory structure or accessory use located on the lot shall be terminated, removed or brought into conformity with this development code. d. The comprehensive landscaping and comprehensive sign programs may be used to satisfy the requirements of this section. 16. There is an "L or U" shaped wall approximately six feet tall within the sight visibility triangle at the parking area off Fredrica Avenue. This wall is within the visibility triangle and should either be cut down in height to a maximum of 36- inches or removed and replaced with landscaping to screen the parking area. Note: Fredrica Avenue will soon be changed to a two -way street (not one -way as present). Development Review Agenda - Thursday, February 7, 2008 - Page 29 DRC Action Agenda 1.1 17 . Written Description (Revised) - Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project Application - bottom of Page 1 - Remove statement "A detailed parking study is attached to this application" and recommend not including the parking study to the CDB. Top of Page 2 - Revise the second sentence from "The parking study..." to "A parking study..." Due to the Downtown Redevelopment Plan (Plan) standards for the East Gateway District, the Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project Application also includes a request for Termination of Status of Nonconformity for Floor Area Ratio and Height ( ?? - see other Planning comments). The Written Description should include a narrative describing the proposal in light of the Plan requirements for this portion of the request. 18. Written Description (Revised) - Residential Infill Project Application - Page 1 - In conjuction with other Landscaping comments, unclear if minimum 10% interior landscaping is being provided or not ( ? ?). The interior landscaping is a function of the vehicular use area, irrespective of the zoning of the parking lot. 19. Revise the second line of the title 'Revised Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project Application, Section D. Written Submittal Requirements (Code Section 3- 913.A)" to responses to 'Revised Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project Application, General Applicability Criteria (Code Section 3- 913.A) ". 20. Response to General Applicability Criteria #1 - The existing Utilities /Infrastructure Facility is NOT consistent with the Downtown Redevelopment Plan East Gateway District standards for FAR and height, thus the reason a portion of this request is for the Termination of Status of Nonconformity. Need to readdress how this response is written, in light of the nonconformity and the request to terminate its nonconforming status. Discussion might involve how long this use has been here, its future use and potentially how landscaping is being employed to help soften the scale and bulk of the building. Also discuss parking lot and landscaping improvements in relation to adjacent properties. 21 . Response to General Applicability Criteria #3 - Revise to NOT discuss the potential development of the northern portion of the overall property that is desired to be cut off from that which will be retained by Verizon.. I would discuss removal of parking from the right -of -way, reworking the driveways to meet current City Codes (including the ability of the Fire Department to access the property), reducing pedestrian/vehicular conflicts through improved driveways and sidewalks, improving handicap accessibililty, separation of pedestrians and vehicles by landscaping, etc. 21. Response to General Applicability Criteria #4 - Remove the comment that the parking study is "attached" as it is not necessary to attach such. I would discuss the realignment of the driveways for improved access, including the Fire Department, improved separation of vehicles and pedestrians. improved pedestrian access through repaired sidewalks and improved handicap accessibility. 23. Response to General Applicability Criteria #5 - Revise to NOT discuss the potential development of the northern portion of the overall property that is desired to be cut off from that which will be retained by Verizon as the primary response to this criteria. The existing Utilities /Infrastructure Facility is NOT consistent with the Downtown Redevelopment Plan East Gateway District standards for FAR and height, thus the reason a portion of this request is for the-Termination of Status of Nonconformity. Need to readdress how this response is written, in light of the nonconformity and the request to terminate its nonconforming status. Speak to the issue of community character of the immediate vicinity around this property. 24. Response to General Applicability Criteria #6 - The existing Utilities /Infrastructure Facility is NOT consistent with the Downtown Redevelopment Plan East Gateway District standards for FAR and height, thus the reason a portion of this request is for the Termination of Status of Nonconformity. Need to address how this proposed revised site ( Verizon) minimizes negative visual effects on adjacent properties (improved through installation of proposed landscaping). 25 . Response to Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project Criteria #1 - The existing Utilities /Infrastructure Facility is NOT consistent with the Downtown Redevelopment Plan East Gateway District standards for FAR and height, thus the reason a portion of this request is for the Termination of Status of Nonconformity. Need to readdress how this response is written, in light of the nonconformity and the request to terminate its nonconforming status. Deviation is necessary through the Termination process to retain the existing facility in its present size and height in order to allow for the sale of the northern portion of the existing property for a residential use. Development Review Agenda - Thursday, February 7, 2008 - Page 30 DRC Aawn Ag-d. 1.1 26 . Response to Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project Criteria #2 - The existing Utilities /Infrastructure Facility is NOT consistent with the Downtown Redevelopment Plan East Gateway District standards for FAR and height, thus the reason a portion of this request is for the Termination of Status of Nonconformity. Need to address how this proposal furthers the District Vision and Development Patterns of the East Gateway District by allowing the retaining of the existing facility in its present size and height in order to allow for the sale of the northern portion of the existing property for a residential use. 27. Response to Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project Criteria #3 - Need to add to this response how approval of this application will provide for the development of the northern area to be sold off for residential use. 28. Response to Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project Criteria #5 - The existing Utilities /Infrastructure Facility is listed in the Downtown District as a Level 1, Flexible Standard Development (FLS) use. Need to address in the response compliance with Criteria] #5a and c (in relation to to retaining the existing facility in its present size and height in order to allow for the sale of the northern portion of the existing property for a residential use). 29. Response to Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project Criteria #6 - Need to address how this proposal is in compliance with all of the design objectives of this criteria. 30. Response to Residential Infill Project Criteria #1 - Need to include in the response how this existing/proposed parking lot in the MHDR District cannot be constructed without the deviations listed in the request (see above, written by staff). 31 . Response to Residential Infill Project Criteria #2 - Response should include how site and landscaping improvements could improve property values of abutting properties. I am not aware of any additional drainage facilities being constructed as part of this application for the parking lot in the MHDR District (last sentence). 32. Response to Residential Infill Project Criteria #4 - Need to include in the response that this nonresidential parking lot is existing, not proposed, and is being improved to allow for the sale of the northern portion of Verizon property for a future residential use. 33 . Criteria #3 for Nonresidential Off - Street Parking in the MHDR District requires a solid fence or wall along the proposed north property line and along the south property line adjacent to the detached dwelling outparcel (22 Fredrica Avenue) a minimum of four feet in height (must be reduced to three feet in height within the front setback along Betty Lane and Fredrica Avenue. Indicate compliance on the plans. This same section requires the landscaping to be placed on the outside of the fence /wall, which I strongly recommend requesting the landscaping be placed on the inside of the fence /wall as a deviation to this criteria (staff will support such deviation). 34. Sheet 1/1 - Revise Land Use Summary for Setbacks (MHDR District) for Side - Proposed to Parking from "5 feet (N & E)" to "5 feet (N & S) ". Other: No Comments Notes: To be placed on the 3/18/08 CDB agenda, submit 15 collated copies of the revised plans & application material addressing all above departments' comments by noon, 2/19/08. Packets shall be collated, folded and stapled as appropriate. Development Review Agenda - Thursday, February 7, 2008 - Page 31 DRC Add Agenda 1.1 Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Monday, January 28, 2008 4:56 PM To: Doherty, Steve Cc: Rice, Scott; Kurtz, Timothy M. Subject: FLD2007- 11035, 1280 Cleveland Street Steve - While discussing this project with Robert Tefft, which is on the next DRC agenda, Robert mentioned that the City is in the beginning stages of a streetscaping plan for Cleveland Street for the East Gateway District. As you may recall, their property line for over 50% of the frontage along Cleveland Street is within 2 -3 feet of the roadway pavement curbing. You are asking for a ROW easement be deeded or dedicated so that the public sidewalk and utilities will be within this ROW easement. They are indicating to plant trees between the sidewalk and roadway curbing. We should be looking at what they are proposing to ensure this will work with our future streetscaping plans. Could you have Tim Kurtz look at the plans for this project and, if necessary, add into Permit Plan for this case any necessary comments regarding plantings within this area so that we can discuss at this Thursday pre -DRC meeting? Thanks. Wayne Wells, Wayne From: Fresk, Sheryl Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2008 2:33 PM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: FLD2007 -11035 AERIAL.doc EXISTING.doc LOCATION.do ZONING.doc C Sheryl A. Fresk City of Clearwater Engineering Department (727)562 -4763 Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2008 1:17 PM To: Herman, Jason Subject: Map Request for 1280 Cleveland Street Jason - Attached is a map request for Case FLD2007 -11035 for the property at 1280 Cleveland Street. I will bring over the paperwork. The survey that I will bring over you may keep. Thanks- Wayne -'; FLD Map equestForm.& Flexible Development Application - Map Request Planner Name: Wayne Wells Case Number: FLD2007 -11035 Date Requested: January 17, 2008 Date Requested for (date): January 31, 2008 .Maps Requested X❑ Location Map X❑ Aerial Map X❑ Zoning Map X❑ Existing Surrounding Uses Map Required Documents to be submitted to Engineering X❑ Legal Description X❑ Survey X❑ Map with Proposed Site Highlighted Map Name Owner: GTE of Florida, Inc. Case: FLD2007 -11035 Site: 1280 Cleveland Street Property Size(Acres): 3.33 15/29/15/12276/003 /0010 PINS: 15/29/15/12276/003 /0130 15/29/15/26658/000 /0010 15/29/15/65250/002 /0010 287B 'Atlas Page: � �--__--_� --- - _ ---___--- ---- - , -~-- 0 sm PREPARED BY PUBLICENORKS ADMINISTRATION 100 S. MyrueG ri 2AV7s,4,C1F8.2:7,a128.rj FL 337S6 ad Ad 1 4".2 ML In HIM! PaAx 0 y Owned Property 10 1h I Agreement to Ann.. a. Legend SUB NUMBER 1. PI.J) 0 BLOCK NUMBER SUBPARCELNUMBER PARCEL NUMBER (M&B) l LAND HOOK (COMMON OWNERSHIP) Aa 11 al a COUNTY HIGHWAY STATE HIGHWAY al U.S. HIGHWAY Of Clearwater OUtSidle City MURT Zoning Atlas Ij Aug 04, 2005 1:05 pm Case Number: r• FLD2007- 110.55 -- 1280 CLEVELAND ST !� Owner(s): Gte Florida Inc �+ ' C/O Property Tax Section .Irving, Tx 75015 P)mco TELEPHONE: No Phone, FAX: No Fax, E -MAIL: No Email Applicant Verizon Corporate Real Estate 220 W Airfield Dr Dock E Mc Dfw Airport, Tx 75261 Cow *A#*%4 TELEPHONE: 972 - 615 -4039, FAX: No Fax, E -MAIL: No Email Representative: James Shimberg 100 N Tampa Street Tampa, F133602 TELEPHONE: 813- 293 -1912, FAX: 813 - 314 -5108, E -MAIL: No Email Location: 3.21 acres located on the north side of Cleveland Street between Betty Lane and Fredrica Drive. Atlas Page: 287B Zoning District: D, Downtown Request: Flexible Development approval (1) to permit an existing office use in the Downtown (D) District with a reduction to number of required parking spaces from three spaces per 1,000 square feet (556 parking spaces) to 0.967 spaces per 1,000 square feet (180 spaces), as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2- 903.C; and (2) to permit nonresidential off - street parking in the Medium High Density Residential (MHDR) District with a reduction to the front (west along Betty Lane) from 25 to 15 feet (to pavement), a reduction to the front (east along Fredrica Avenue) from 25 to 15 feet (to pavement) and deviations to allow a structure (pavement) within the front setback and to place landscaping on the inside of the buffer fence along the north side of the property, as a Residential Infill Project, under the provisions of Section 2- 404.F. (NOTE: APPLICATION WILL NEED TO BE AMENDED ACCORDING TO REVISED REQUEST.) Proposed Use: Utility /infrastructure facilities Neighborhood No Registered Assocation Association(s): TELEPHONE: No Phone, FAX: No Fax, E -MAIL: No Email Neighborhood Clearwater Neighborhoods Coalition Association(s): Clearwater, F133758 P O Box 8204 TELEPHONE: No Phone, FAX: No Fax, E -MAIL: No Email Presenter: Wayne Wells, Planner III Attendees Included: City: Wayne Wells, Neil Thompson, Scott Rice, Steve Doherty, Rick Albee, Jim Keller, Tom Glenn Applicant: James Shimberg, Robert Pergolizzi, Brian Gee, Jim Ford, Mike Patterson, Alan Murphy . The DRC reviewed this application with the following comments: General Engineering: Development Review Agenda - Thursday, December 6, 2007 - Page 21 The following conditions shall be met prior to review by the Community Development Board: 1. The legal description on the survey and site plan appears incorrect. The 10 -foot right -of -way easement described in O.R.3379 -107 is part of the privately owned property. Similarly, O.R. 4448 -112 is a 20 -foot right -of -way easement that is located inside of the west property lines of Lots 4 - 8, inclusive, of F.A. Kennedy's Fair Lane Addition Sub. Please note Lot 9 of this subdivision has no easement over the west 20 -feet. 2. Turning radii at all driveways shall be a minimum of 30 feet per City of Clearwater Contract Specifications and Standards index #108. The proposed redesigned parking lot shall meet this requirement. 3. Curbing along the north end of the proposed redesigned parking lot will block stormwater that currently drains to retention area. Provide a method for directing this stormwater to the retention area. 4. Parking spaces located at the south end of Betty Lane are proposed to be redesigned. Revise the plan to show the dimensions of the parking spaces and the aisle serving the parking spaces to confirm the design will meet Community Code dimensional requirements. 5. A "one story block building" and a "wood frame addition" are shown on the survey in an area proposed as parking on the site plan. Are these buildings to be demolished? If so, utilities will need to be cut and capped prior to the demolition. Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy: 1. 180 -feet of public sidewalk along Cleveland Street is presently located within a 10 -foot wide strip of private property. Public utililites are also located in this portion of property. Applicant shall deed or dedicate to the City of Clearwater a 10 -foot right -of -way easement. 2. Applicant shall submit 5 sets of as -built drawings that are signed and sealed by a professional engineer registered in the State of Florida. Construction Services Inspector will field inspect as -built drawings for accuracy. General Note: DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. Environmental: 1 , A "one story block building" and a "wood frame addition" are shown on the survey in an area proposed as parking on the site plan. If buildings are to be demolished, an Asbestos Survey and Notification to Pinellas County Air Quality is required prior to demolition. Fire: 1 . Northern Driveway has been removed, how does Fire Apparatus turn around as you have a building and cars parking as they proceed south ? Explain. 2. Parking has been adjusted on the West Side of the building to move against the building, this is now blocking doors marked as DO NOT BLOCK, FIRE EXIT. You can not block a fire exit. 3 . New Driveway entry needs to have a 30' radius for fire access. Not shown Harbor Master: 1 . No issues. Legal: 1 , No issues. Land Resources: Development Review Agenda - Thursday, December 6, 2007 - Page 22 1 . Remove all #2 and below rated trees, see arborist report. Modify all plans prior to CDB. 2. Provide the tree tag numbers on the Tree Preservation Plan prior to CDB. 3 . Revise the spread sheet expressing the total number of trees to be removed, calculating the the DBH of all trees being removed with a rating of 3 and above on an inch for inch. basis and the total proposed inches. Note: palm trees with 10' of clear trunk receive a 1" deficit if removed and a 1" credit if proposed and accent trees receive a 2" deficit if removed and a 2" credit if proposed. No preserved credits allowed. Revise prior to CDB. 4. Provide a Utility & a Paving and Grading Plan prior to CDB. Additional comments may be forthcoming once this data is received and reviewed as grade changes affect root prune limits which then may affect the Tree Preservation Plan. 5 . Once the proposed grades are established reasses the root prune requirements at tree 13 and 15. Root pruning can not occur within the root plate zone, 2.5' from tree 13 and 12' from the tree 15. Revise prior to CDB. 6. The tree inventory is inaccurate. Tree 15 is a 48" laurel oak, tree 17 is a 28 ", 29" twin laurel oak and tree 30 is a 42" laurel oak that should be rated a #1. Revise inventory prior to CDB. 7. Provide ratings for ALL trees on the inventory prior to CDB. Landscaping: Development Review Agenda - Thursday, December 6, 2007 - Page 23 1 . Landscape plan Sheet 2/3 - Live oak spacing proposed too close. Should be no closer than 30 - 35 feet together. 2. Landscape plan Sheet 2/3 - Perimeter landscape buffers in the MHDR District requires a 10 -foot buffer along Betty Lane and Fredrica Avenue and adjacent to the north side of the existing detached dwelling. Buffers to have trees and 100 percent shrubs per Section 3- 1202.D.1. Shrubs along the north side of the existing detached dwelling must attain six feet, height within three years. 3 . Must provide vertical curb along the front of the parking spaces facing Fredrica Avenue north of the retention pond, the edges of the terminal landscape island north of this row of spaces and along the front of the northernmost parking space rows. 4. Landscape Plan Sheet 2/3 - Small interior landscape island on the north side of the row of parallel parking spaces is too small for a live oak tree. Change to two accent trees. 5 . Landscape plan Sheet 2/3 - Revise Plant Material List or the plan: a. indicates 26 QV, but the plan only indicates 24 QV based on the quantity in the symbol legends; b. indicates 180 DV, but the plan indicates 202 DV. 6. While there is no required perimeter buffer required in the Downtown District, the detached dwelling parcel fronting on Fredrica Avenue within the MHDR District should be buffered from this use through trees and shrubs (shrubs to grow to six feet in height within three years). Alternately, potentially, a six -foot high solid fence or wall could be substituted, with shrubs on the Verizon side of the fence /wall. 7. Landscape plan Sheet 2/3 - Plan appears to be removing existing grass from under the trees adjacent to the retention pond and replacing with mulch. Unclear why? 8 . Landscape plan Sheet 2/3 - Pine trees proposed to be planted too close to parking spaces. Sap from trees drip on parked cars and then owners later want to remove them as a nuisance. Plant pine trees no closer than 20 feet to parking spaces. 9. Plant Material List indicates the QV to be 16 -foot tall and 3 -inch caliper. For this caliper size, 16 -foot tall seems excessively tall. Code minimum at time of planting is 10 -foot tall and 2.5 -inch caliper. 10. Dimension the width of landscape islands, where non - typical. It appears that all islands are proposed at nine -foot wide (outside curbing), except the eastern island north of the building. 11 . Landscape Plan Sheet 2/3 - Accent trees must be 2 -inch caliper, not 1 -inch. Revise. 12 . A minimum planting area five feet in width is required for Foundation Landscaping (Section 3- 1202.E.2), where buildings face rights -of -ways. If it cannot be provided in full (such as on the east side along Fredrica Avenue where it ranges from 1.54 to 3.2 feet in width or along the south along Cleveland Street where it is 3.09 feet at the southeast corner), then such reduction must be included in the request. Based on other Planning comments, foundation area on the west side along Betty Lane will be able to be met. Plantings within the foundation landscape area must meet Code requirements (trees, shrubs and groundcovers). Landscape plan Sheet 2/3 indicates muhly grass along the east side of the building. With the adjacent sidewalk, this foundation area is narrow. With growth of muhly grass, unclear if this will produce a nuisance to pedestrians walking along the sidewalk. If trimmed to minimize nuisance, how will muhly grass look along this side. Should be planting palms to provide landscape height and other accent trees within the foundation landscape areas to help soften the blank building facade. 13 . Enlarge proposed interior landscape island in the parking rows on the northernmost side of the parking lot by eliminating the terminal island on the west side of this northernmost parking row and transferring the landscape area from this west side to the interior landscape island. Adjust parking spaces to the west. This gives a greater area for the tree preservation root system. 14. Code requires a minimum interior landscape area of 10 percent of the vehicular use area (should be 5,637 sf required, based on 56,368 sf of vehicular use area). Site plan indicates proposed is 2,763 sf and 2 percent. With 2,763 sf, this should be 4.9 percent. Sheet 1/3 indicates total greenspace of 9,413 s£ Cannot count as interior landscape area perimeter buffers in the MHDR District. Revise calculations. If it the applicant's proposal to not provide the required interior landscape area, then the application must include such as a reduction. Alternately, if the interior landscape area were to be placed in other appropriate locations where the design, character, location and/or materials are demonstrably more attractive than minimum landscape requirements, then a Comprehensive Landscape Program application must be also submitted, complying with Code criteria. Development Review Agenda - Thursday, December 6, 2007 - Page 24 15 . Landscape sheets 1 - 3 were prepared by L. Alyson Utter, but signed/sealed in the box where Richard Harris name is on the sheet. Revise by removing Richard Harris' name. Parks and Recreation: No issues - project in CRA. Stormwater: 1 . The following shall be addressed prior to review by the Community Development Board: 1. The grading plan shall show the complete storm sewer system. 2. Provide a grading and drainage plan showing the proposed grading of the new parking lot that'shows how runoff gets to the retention area. 3. Until the northern property is redeveloped the applicant shall maintain the same drainage pattern and system for both properties. 4. The parking lot redesign prevents runoff from the northern portion from draining to the pond. Please address this problem. 5. When the northern portion is being redeveloped, the City will require either an on -site new retention pond with new outfall to a stormwater pipe in Fredrica Drive or an agreement between the 2 owners allowing the existing pond and private stormwater facilities to be used for the northern portion. NOTE: If the proposed development of the northerly property necessitates infrastructure modifications to satisfy site - specific stormwater outfall needs the modifications shall be completed by the applicant and at their expense. The following shall be addressed prior to the issuance of building permit. 1. Upon review of the storm water system, an agreement between landowners may be required to allow for maintenance and use of the existing stormwater system by both properties. General note: 1. DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. Solid Waste: 1 . 12/6/07 - WW It was discussed at the DRC meeting the location of the existing dumpster for two dumpsters. Any relocation on -site will need to provide an enclosure meeting City Code for the two dumpsters acceptable to Solid Waste, making sure the solid waste truck can access the enclosure and leave in a safe manner. 11/21/07 - TJG How is Solid Waste handled? Traffic Engineering: Development Review Agenda - Thursday, December 6, 2007 - Page 25 1 . Provide handicapped parking stall and sign details compliant with City standards. http:// www. myclearwater. com/ gov/ depts/ pwa /engin/Production/stddet/index. asp 2. Provide an accessible route from h/c parking spaces to nearest accessible entrance that shall be designed such that users are not compelled to walk or wheel behind parked vehicles. Florida Accessibility Code for Building Construction Chapter 11, Section 11- 4.6.2. 3. Provide an accessible route from a building's accessible entrance to a public sidewalk compliant with Florida Accessibility Code for Building Construction Chapter 11, Section 11- 4.3.2. 4. Install ADA standard truncated domes where sidewalk crosses the driveways. 5. Civil site plan is too busy. Remove the existing parking lot and landscaped islands if not in the proposed parking lot design. 6. Align the internal drive aisle and driveway at Betty Lane for better vehicular flow. 7. Remove the word "Compact" for the parking spaces. City does not allow compact parking Planning: spaces. 8. Parking spaces located at the south end of Betty Lane are proposed to be redesigned. Revise the plan to show the dimensions of the parking spaces and the aisle serving the parking spaces to confirm the design will meet Community Code dimensional requirements. 9. Retain/realign northerly driveway on Betty Lane to provide for better access for Fire Department vehicles through redesigned parking lot. Driveway shall be aligned with parking aisle and have minimum 30 -foot radii at street. The above to be addressed prior to a Community Development Board (CDB) hearing. General Note(s): 1) Applicant shall comply with the current Transportation Impact Fee Ordinance and fee schedule and'paid prior to a Certificate of Occupancy (C.O.). 2) DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. Development Review Agenda - Thursday, December 6, 2007 - Page 26 I . Provide as part of the site data (existing, proposed and required): a. site area (existing property is proposed to be reduced to allow for the sale of the northern portion of the property [not included]); b. building floor area; c. FAR; d. building height; d. vehicular use area; e. interior landscape area; and . f. number of parking spaces. 2 . Response to General Applicability criteria #6 - Provide a response that addresses this proposal and the criteria. 3 . There is an existing one -story building within the existing parking lot. One can assume that this building is being removed, but plan is not explicit. If this building is being removed, it would also seem that there is more existing floor area and that the proposed floor area would be less. 4. Response to General Applicability criteria #4 - The parking demand study looked at the number of parking spaces. Provide a response that addresses traffic congestion (or lack thereof) for this proposal. 5 . Response to General Applicability criteria #3 - Provide a response that speaks to this proposal, not the future request on the northern property the owner wants to sell off. 6. The purpose of this request is to be able to sell off the northern portion of the site for other development. As such, the following will be included as a condition of approval: That, prior to the submission for a site development building permit to effect the site changes, a Release of Unity of Title and Minor Lot Adjustment application be submitted to and approved by the Planning Department. 7. Survey indicates a 'ROW easement" along Betty Lane, outside the boundary of the site as indicated. Easements are usually on property, not within the ROW. Based on a review of recorded documents for this side of the property by our Engineering Department, revise the survey and the site and landscape plans modifying the location of the Betty Lane property line and revise ALL site data. 8 . On Page 1 of the application; provide the parcel size in square footage on the appropriate line. 9. In lieu of providing building elevations of the existing building, provide color photos of all four sides of the building. 10 . On Page 1 of the application the parcel size is listed as 5.6 acres, yet on the site plan it is listed as 3.21 acres. Which is correct? 11 . Existing overhead utility lines run along the east side of Betty Lane and down the "middle" of the subject property. Section 3 -911 requires the undergrounding of these overhead utility lines. Such undergrounding of these existing overhead utility lines appears feasible. 12 . Wheel stops are not required when parking spaces abut other parking spaces internally in the parking lot. As such, may remove these wheel stops. 13 . Show on the site plan: a. the zoning district lines of the Downtown and MHDR Districts (may be as an inset); and b. the property at 22 Fredrica Avenue as "not included ". 14. On Page 6 of the application, must complete the following: Acknowledgement of fire flow calculations /water study requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following): Fire Flow Calculations/Water Study is included. Fire Flow Calculations/Water Study is not required. 15 . On Page 6 of the application, must complete the following: Acknowledgement of traffic impact study requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following): Traffic Impact Study is included. The study must include a summary table of pre- and post - development levels.of service for all roadway legs and each turning movement at all intersections identified in the Scoping Meeting. Traffic Impact Study is not required. 16. Response to General Applicability criteria #5 - Provide a response that addresses this proposal, not the future request on that portion to be sold off. 17. Revise the survey to indicate Fredrica Avenue (field) Fredrica Drive (plat) and revise the site plan and landscape plans to indicate Fredrica Avenue (not Drive). 18 . Revise the Written Description, Background, first line to indicate Fredrica Avenue (not Street). Development Review Agenda - Thursday, December 6, 2007 - Page 27 19 . Revise the Written Description, Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment rroject Application - Ensure the building square footage is correct (see other Planning comments regarding existing versus proposed building square footage). 20. Response to Residential Infill Project criteria #5 - Revise Fredrica Street to Fredrica Avenue. Need to address landscape upgrades. 21 . Response to Residential Infill Project criteria ##4 - Address compatibility of this proposal. Hint - The parking lot is not a new use, but has existed for "x" number of years. How has it operated in the past and how will it operate differently in the future? 22. Response to Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria #6 - Address HOW this proposal is in compliance with this criteria, including all of the objectives. 23 . Provide a demolition site plan. Site plan is too busy with existing conditions and inconsistent information, which is confusing. 24. Response to Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria #5 - Address HOW the proposal meets the criteria, in as much detail as necessary, as the existing response does not address the criteria, especially one or more of the objectives. 25 . Response to Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria #3 - The reason for the request is to reduce parking to allow for the sale of the northern portion of the property for redevelopment in conformance with the MHDR District (most likely attached dwellings). 26. Parking lot designed with parking space stall length of 19 feet generally. Code minimum stall length requirement is 18 feet. May reduce stall length. 27. Response to Residential Infill Project criteria #6 - Revise Fredrica Street to Fredrica Avenue. Need to address landscape upgrades as an enhancement. 28. Response to Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria #2 - Address HOW this proposal is in compliance with the criteria (Downtown Redevelopment Plan and zoning). 29. Page 7 of the application, Affidavit to Authorize Agent, need to indicate under Douglas Dale's name his position title in General Telephone Company of Florida (president, secretary, etc.). 30. Comply with Downtown Design Guidelines of the Downtown Redevelopment Plan, including the requirement to screen parking from street rights -of -way (see page 84 of the Downtown Redevelopment Plan). 31. Based on discussions with senior Planning management of this application, the existing, primary use of the building is deemed to be a "utility/infrastructure facility" and not an "office" use. "Utility/infrastructure facility" is defined as: "Utilities /infrastructure facility means an electric or gas substation, stormwater management facilities, water or wastewater pumping station, telephone repeater station or similar structure used as an intermediary switching, boosting, distribution or transfer station or lines for electricity, cable television, or telephone services between the point of generation and the end user, but not including satellite dish antennas, facilities for the handling of solid waste, or radio, television, or relay towers." Revise Description of Request on Page 1 of the application, Written Description narrative and any appropriate standards /information in the Land Use Summary on the site plan. 32. As an "utilities /infrastructure facility" use, such is listed as a Level 1, Flexible Standard Development (FLS) use in the Downtown District. However, since flexibility criteria #1 and #2 cannot be met, this cannot be processed as a FLS application. Since an "utilities /infrastructure facility" use is not listed as a Level 2, Flexible Development (FLD) use, such request must be processed as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project application. 33 . The Downtown District does not require any parking for an "utilities /infrastructure facility" use. The Parking Demand Study is still helpful, in that it determined the amount of parking needed for this use (105 spaces minimum). As such that there is no requirement for a minimum number of parking spaces, however, the applicant must provide for the parking needs of the existing use. The applicant may continue with the parking design on the north side or may modify it to reduce closer to present need. Staff would recommend not reducing the parking count too low, where it may impact future company parking needs where there is no ability to expand on -site parking. Development Review Agenda - Thursday, December 6, 2007 - Page 28 34 . Under the East Gateway District of the Downtown Redevelopment Plan, the maximum floor area ratio (FAR) is 0.55 and the maximum height is 50 feet. The calculation of the existing FAR is based on the entire land area between Betty Lane and Fredrica Avenue from Cleveland Street to Drew Street. The proposed FAR is based on the proposed land area (keeping in mind that the existing one -story building is being removed, which decreases the floor area square footage)., In any case, the existing and proposed FAR exceeds the maximum of 0.55, which is deemed to be nonconforming to that permitted under the Downtown Redevelopment Plan. Additionally, while the actual building height is not provided, the application notes that the height exceeds the maximum of 50 feet. The existing height is also nonconforming to that permitted under the Downtown Redevelopment Plan. Recommend as part of the Level 2 application to also request a Termination of Status of Nonconformity for FAR and building height, under the provisions of Section 6 -109. The requirements under Section 6 -109.0 are: a. Perimeter buffers conforming to the requirements of section 3- 1202(C) shall be installed. b. Off - street parking lots shall be improved to meet the landscaping standards established in section 3- 1202(D). c. Any nonconforming sign, outdoor lighting or other accessory structure or accessory use located on the lot shall be terminated, removed or brought into conformity with this development code. d. The comprehensive landscaping and comprehensive sign programs may be used to satisfy-the requirements of this section. 35 . Existing parking spaces on the west side of the building closest to Cleveland Street are located facing Betty Lane. Proposal relocates these parking spaces to be adjacent to the building. There are existing doors on the west side of the building, including required egress doors, which is not accounted for. The required egress doors cannot open into parking spaces. In any way, these existing spaces are situated within the Betty Lane right -of -way or are proposed to be relocated so that they must back into the right -of -way of Betty Lane. Recommend removing all of these spaces and drive aisle/backup area and replacing with landscaping. Planning staff cannot support retaining these spaces or drive aisle that would be in the Betty Lane right -of -way and requests the removal of all of these spaces and drive aislelbackup area and replacing such with landscaping. 36 . The existing dumpster enclosure on the west side of the site requires truck pickup in two directions (from the north and from the south). This dumpster enclosure is located within the right -of -way of Betty Lane. Relocate it on -site to a location and with a design meeting City requirements acceptable to the Solid Waste Department. 37 . On Page 1 of the application the project valuation has been listed as "N /A ". However, there will be a cost associated with constructing the proposed improvements. Recommend inserting a reasonable project valuation. Other: No Comments Notes: This application is insufficient to move forward to the CDB. Revise application package (plans and written material) and resubmit one original package and 14 copies to go back to future DRC. Development Review Agenda - Thursday, December 6, 2007 - Page 29 I . o *Dr& 1.05 pm Case Number: FLD2007 -1 Yv 15 -- 1280 CLEVELAND ST • Owner(s): Gte Florida Inc ' ?we `0 O, C/O Property Tax Section Irving, Tx 75015 "pit TELEPHONE: No Phone, FAX: No Fax, E -MAIL: No Email Applicant Verizon Corporate Real Estate 220 W Airfield Dr Dock E Mc Dfw Airport, Tx 75261 TELEPHONE: 972 - 615 -4039, FAX: No Fax, E -MAIL: No Email Representative: James Shimberg 100 N Tampa Street Tampa, F133602 TELEPHONE: 813 - 293 -1912, FAX: 813 - 314 -5108, E -MAIL: No Email Location: 3.21 acres located on the north side of Cleveland Street between Betty Lane and Fredrica Drive. Atlas Page: 287B Zoning District: D, Downtown Request: Flexible Development approval (1) to permit an existing office use in the Downtown (D) District with a reduction to number of required parking spaces from three spaces per 1,000 square feet (556 parking spaces) to 0.967 spaces per 1,000 square feet (180 spaces), as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2- 903.C; and (2) to permit nonresidential off - street parking in the Medium High Density Residential (MHDR) District with a reduction to the front (west along Betty Lane) from 25 to 15 feet (to pavement), a reduction to the front (east along Fredrica Avenue) from 25 to 15 feet (to pavement) and deviations to allow a structure (pavement) within the front setback and to place landscaping on the inside of the buffer fence along the north side of the property, as a Residential Infill Project, under the provisions of Section 2- 404.F. (NOTE: APPLICATION WILL NEED TO BE AMENDED ACCORDING TO REVISED REQUEST.) Proposed Use: Utility /infrastructure facilities Neighborhood No Registered Assocation Association(s): TELEPHONE: No Phone, FAX: No Fax, E -MAIL: No Email Neighborhood Clearwater Neighborhoods Coalition Association(s): Clearwater, F133758 P O Box 8204 TELEPHONE: No Phone, FAX: No Fax, E -MAIL: No Email Presenter: Wayne Wells, Planner III Attendees Included: City: Wayne Wells, Neil Thompson, Scott Rice, Steve Doherty, Rick Albee, Lenny Rickard, Tom Glenn Applicant: James Shimberg, Robert Pergolizzi, Richard Harris The DRC reviewed this application with the following comments: General Engineering: Development Review Agenda - Thursday, December 6, 2007 - Page 19 The following conaitions shall be met prior to review by the Community, Development Board: 1. The legal description on the survey and site plan appears incorrect. The 10 -foot right -of -way easement described in O.R.3379 -107 is part of the privately owned property. Similarly, O.R. 4448 -112 is a 20 -foot right -of -way easement that is located inside of the west property lines of Lots 4 - 8, inclusive, of F.A. Kennedy's Fair Lane Addition Sub. Please note Lot 9 of this subdivision has no easement over the west 20 -feet. 2. Turning radii at all driveways shall be a minimum of 30 feet per City of Clearwater Contract Specifications and Standards index #108. The proposed redesigned parking lot shall meet this requirement. 3. Curbing along the north end of the proposed redesigned parking lot will block stormwater that currently drains to retention area. Provide a method for directing this stormwater to the retention area. 4. Backout parking spaces located at the south end of Betty Lane are proposed. Community Development Code Sec. 3- 1402(B) prohibits parking spaces that require a vehicle to back into a street right -of -way. Accordingly, either show the current location of these parking spaces on the plan or redesign parking in this area to meet Community Code requirements. 5. 180 -feet of public sidewalk along Cleveland Street is presently located within a 10 -foot wide strip of private property. Public utililites are also located in this portion of property. Applicant shall deed or dedicate to the City of Clearwater a 10 -foot right -of -way easement. 6. A "one story block building" and a "wood frame addition" are shown on the survey in an area proposed as parking on the site plan. Are these buildings to be demolished? If so, utilities will need to be cut and capped prior to the demolition. Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy: 1. Applicant shall submit 5 sets of as -built drawings that are signed and sealed by a professional engineer registered in the State of Florida. Construction Services Inspector will field inspect as -built drawings for accuracy. General Note: DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. Environmental: 1 . A "one story block building" and a "wood frame addition" are shown on the survey in an area proposed as parking on the site plan. If buildings are to be demolished, an Asbestos Survey and Notification to Pinellas County Air Quality is required prior to demolition. Fire: 1 , Northern Driveway has been removed, how does Fire Apparatus turn around as you have a building and cars parking as they proceed south ? Explain. 2. Parking has been adjusted on the West Side of the building to move against the building, this is now blocking doors marked as DO NOT BLOCK, FIRE EXIT. You can not block a fire exit. 3 . New Driveway entry needs to have a 30' radius for fire access. Not shown Harbor Master: 1 . No issues. Legal: I , No issues. Land Resources: Development Review Agenda - Thursday, December 6, 2007 - Page 20 6. 7. Remove all #2 ana below rated trees, see arborist report. Modify ah plans prior to CDB. Provide the tree tag numbers on the Tree Preservation Plan prior to CDB. Revise the spread sheet expressing the total number of trees to be removed, calculating the the DBH of all trees being removed with a rating of 3 and above on an inch for inch basis and the total proposed inches. Note: palm trees with 10' of clear trunk receive a 1" deficit if removed and a 1" credit if proposed and accent trees receive a 2" deficit if removed and a 2" credit if proposed. No preserved credits allowed. Revise prior to CDB. Provide a Utility & a Paving and Grading Plan prior to CDB. Additional comments may be forthcoming once this data is received and reviewed as grade changes affect root prune limits which then may affect the Tree Preservation Plan. Once the proposed grades are established reasses the root prune requirements at tree 13 and 15. Root pruning can not occur within the root plate zone, 2.5' from tree 13 and 12' from the tree 15. Revise prior to CDB. The tree inventory is inaccurate. Tree 15 is a 48" laurel oak, tree 17 is a 28 ", 29" twin laurel oak and tree 30 is a 42" laurel oak that should be rated a #1. Revise inventory prior to CDB. Provide ratings for ALL trees on the inventory prior to CDB. Landscaping: Development Review Agenda - Thursday, December 6, 2007 - Page 21 1 . Landscape plan Sheet 2/3 - Live oak spacing proposed too close. Should be no closer than 30 - 35 feet together. 2. Landscape plan Sheet 2/3 - Perimeter landscape buffers in the MHDR District requires a 10 -foot buffer along Betty Lane and Fredrica Avenue and adjacent to the north side of the existing detached dwelling. Buffers to have trees and 100 percent shrubs per Section 3- 1202.D.1. Shrubs along the north side of the existing detached dwelling must attain six feet height within three years. 3 . Must provide vertical curb along the front of the parking spaces facing Fredrica Avenue north of the retention pond, the edges of the terminal landscape island north of this row of spaces and along the front of the northernmost parking space rows. 4. Landscape Plan Sheet 2/3 - Small interior landscape island on the north side of the row of parallel parking spaces is too small for a live oak tree. Change to two accent trees. 5 . Landscape plan Sheet 2/3 - Revise Plant Material List or the plan: a. indicates 26 QV, but the plan only indicates 24 QV based on the quantity in the symbol legends; b. indicates 180 DV, but the plan indicates 202 DV. 6. While there is no required perimeter buffer required in the Downtown District, the detached dwelling parcel fronting on Fredrica Avenue within the MHDR District should be buffered from this use through trees and shrubs (shrubs to grow to six feet in height within three years). Alternately, potentially, a six -foot high solid fence or wall could be substituted, with shrubs on the Verizon side of the fence /wall. 7. Landscape plan Sheet 2/3 - Plan appears to be removing existing grass from under the trees adjacent to the retention pond and replacing with mulch. Unclear why? 8 . Landscape plan Sheet 2/3 - Pine trees proposed to be planted too close to parking spaces. Sap from trees drip on parked cars and then owners later want to remove them as a nuisance. Plant pine trees no closer than 20 feet to parking spaces. 9. Plant Material List indicates the QV to be 16 -foot tall and 3 -inch caliper. For this caliper size, 16 -foot tall seems excessively tall. Code minimum at time of planting is 10 -foot tall and 2.5 -inch caliper. 10. Dimension the width of landscape islands, where non - typical. It appears that all islands are proposed at nine -foot wide (outside curbing), except the eastern island north of the building. 11 . Landscape Plan Sheet 2/3 - Accent trees must be 2 -inch caliper, not 1 -inch. Revise. 12. A minimum planting area five feet in width is required for Foundation Landscaping (Section 3- 1202.E.2), where buildings face rights -of -ways. If it cannot be provided in full (such as on the east side along Fredrica Avenue where it ranges from 1.54 to 3.2 feet in width or along the south along Cleveland Street where it is 3.09 feet at the southeast corner), then such reduction must be included in the request. Based on other Planning comments, foundation area on the west side along Betty Lane will be able to be met. Plantings within the foundation landscape area must meet Code requirements (trees, shrubs and groundcovers). Landscape plan Sheet 2/3 indicates muhly grass along the east side of the building. With the adjacent sidewalk, this foundation area is narrow. With growth of muhly grass, unclear if this will produce a nuisance to pedestrians walking along the sidewalk. If trimmed to minimize nuisance, how will muhly grass look along this side. Should be planting palms to provide landscape height and other accent trees within the foundation landscape areas to help soften the blank building facade. 13 . Enlarge proposed interior landscape island in the parking rows on the northernmost side of the parking lot by eliminating the terminal island on the west side of this northernmost parking row and transferring the landscape area from this west side to the interior landscape island. Adjust parking spaces to the west. This gives a greater area for the tree preservation root system. 14. Code requires a minimum interior landscape area of 10 percent of the vehicular use area (should be 5,637 sf required, based on 56,368 sf of vehicular use area). Site plan indicates proposed is 2,763 sf and 2 percent. With 2,763 sf, this should be 4.9 percent. Sheet 1/3 indicates total greenspace of 9,413 s£ Cannot count as interior landscape area perimeter buffers in the MHDR District. Revise calculations. If it the applicant's proposal to not provide the required interior landscape area, then the application must include such as a reduction. Alternately, if the interior landscape area were to be placed in other appropriate locations where the design, character, location and/or materials are demonstrably more attractive than minimum landscape requirements, then a Comprehensive Landscape Program application must be also submitted, complying with Code criteria. Development Review Agenda - Thursday, December 6, 2007 - Page 22 15 . Landscape sheets i - 3 were prepared by L. Alyson Utter, but signea/sealed in the box where Richard Harris name is on the sheet. Revise by removing Richard Harris' name. Parks and Recreation: No issues - project in CRA. Stormwater: I . The following shall be addressed prior to review by the Community Development Board: 1. The grading plan shall show the complete storm sewer system. 2. Provide a grading and drainage plan showing the proposed grading of the new parking lot that shows how runoff gets to the retention area. 3. Until the northern property is redeveloped the applicant shall maintain the same drainage pattern and system for both properties. 4. The parking lot redesign prevents runoff from the northern portion from draining to the pond. Please address this problem. 5. When the northern portion is being redeveloped, the City will require either an on -site new retention pond with new outfall to a stormwater pipe in Fredrica Drive or an agreement between the 2 owners allowing the existing pond and private stormwater facilities to be used for the northern portion. NOTE: If the proposed development of the northerly property necessitates infrastructure modifications to satisfy site - specific stormwater outfall needs the modifications shall be completed by the applicant and at their expense. The following shall be addressed prior to the issuance of building permit. 1. Upon review of the storm water system, an agreement between landowners may be required to allow for maintenance and use of the existing stormwater system by both properties. General note: 1. DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. Solid Waste: 1 How is Solid Waste handled? Traffic Engineering: Development Review Agenda - Thursday, December 6, 2007 - Page 23 Planning: Provide handicapped parking stall and sign details compliant with City standards. http: / /www. myclearwater. com/gov/ depts/ pwa /engin/Production/stddet/index. asp 2. Provide an accessible route from h/c parking spaces to nearest accessible entrance that shall be designed such that users are not compelled to walk or wheel behind parked vehicles. Florida Accessibility Code for Building Construction Chapter 11, Section 11- 4.6.2. 3. Provide an accessible route from a building's accessible entrance to a public sidewalk compliant with Florida Accessibility Code for Building Construction Chapter 11, Section 11- 4.3.2. 4. Install ADA standard truncated domes where sidewalk crosses the driveways. 5. Civil site plan is too busy. Remove the existing parking lot and landscaped islands if not in the proposed parking lot design. 6. Align the internal drive aisle and driveway at Betty Lane for better vehicular flow. 7. Remove the word "Compact" for the parking spaces. City does not allow compact parking spaces. 8. Backout parking spaces located at the south end of Betty Lane are proposed. Community Development Code Sec. 3- 1402(B) prohibits parking spaces that require a vehicle to back into a street right -of -way. Accordingly, either show the current location of these parking spaces on the plan or redesign parking in this area to meet Community Code requirements. 9. Retain/realign northerly driveway on Betty Lane to provide for better access for Fire Department vehicles through redesigned parking lot. Driveway shall be aligned with parking aisle and have minimum 30 -foot radii at street. The above to be addressed prior to a Community Development Board (CDB) hearing. General Note(s): 1) Applicant shall comply with the current Transportation Impact Fee Ordinance and fee schedule and paid prior to a Certificate of Occupancy (C.O.). 2) DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. Development Review Agenda - Thursday, December 6, 2007 - Page 24 Provide as part of the site data (existing, proposed and required): a. site area (existing property is proposed to be reduced to allow for the sale of the northern portion of the property [not included]); b. building floor area; c. FAR; d. building height; d. vehicular use area; e. interior landscape area; and f. number of parking spaces. Response to General Applicability criteria #6 - Provide a response that addresses this proposal and the criteria. There is an existing one -story building within the existing parking lot. One can assume that this building is being removed, but plan is not explicit. If this building is being removed, it would also seem that there is more existing floor area and that the proposed floor area would be less. Response to General Applicability criteria #4 - The parking demand study looked at the number of parking spaces. Provide a response that addresses traffic congestion (or lack thereof) for this proposal. Response to General Applicability criteria #3 - Provide a response that speaks to this proposal, not the future request on the northern property the owner wants to sell off. The purpose of this request is to be able to sell off the northern portion of the site for other development. As such, the following will be included as a condition of approval: That, prior to the submission for a site development building permit to effect the site changes, a Release of Unity of Title and Minor Lot Adjustment application be submitted to and approved by the Planning Department. 7. Survey indicates a 'ROW easement" along Betty Lane, outside the boundary of the site as indicated. Easements are usually on property, not within the ROW. Based on a review of recorded documents for this side of the property by our Engineering Department, revise the survey and the site and landscape plans modifying the location of the Betty Lane property line and revise ALL site data. 8 . On Page 1 of the application, provide the parcel size in square footage on the appropriate line. 9. In lieu of providing building elevations of the existing building, provide color photos of all four sides of the building. 10 . On Page 1 of the application the parcel size is listed as 5.6 acres, yet on the site plan it is listed as 3.21 acres. Which is correct? 11 . Existing overhead utility lines run along the east side of Betty Lane and down the "middle" of the subject property. Section 3 -911 requires the undergrounding of these overhead utility lines. Such undergrounding of these existing overhead utility lines appears feasible. 12. Wheel stops are not required when parking spaces abut other parking spaces internally in the parking lot. As such, may remove these wheel stops. 13 . Show on the site plan: a. the zoning district lines of the Downtown and MHDR Districts (may be as an inset); and b. the property at 22 Fredrica Avenue as "not included ". 14. On Page 6 of the application, must complete the following: Acknowledgement of fire flow calculations /water study requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following): Fire Flow Calculations/Water Study is included. Fire Flow Calculations/Water Study is not required. 15 . On Page 6 of the application, must complete the following: Acknowledgement of traffic impact study requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following): Traffic Impact Study is included. The study must include a summary table of pre- and post - development levels of service for all roadway legs and each turning movement at all intersections identified in the Scoping Meeting. Traffic Impact Study is not required. 16. Response to General Applicability criteria #5 - Provide a response that addresses this proposal, not the future request on that portion to be sold off. 17. Revise the survey to indicate Fredrica Avenue (field) Fredrica Drive (plat) and revise the site plan and landscape plans to indicate Fredrica Avenue (not Drive). 18 . Revise the Written Description, Background, first line to indicate Fredrica Avenue (not Street). Development Review Agenda - Thursday, December 6, 2007 - Page 25 19 . Revise the Written Description, Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project Application - Ensure the building square footage is correct (see other Planning comments regarding existing versus proposed building square footage). 20. Response to Residential Infill Project criteria #5 - Revise Fredrica Street to Fredrica Avenue. Need to address landscape upgrades. 21 . Response to Residential Infill Project criteria #4 - Address compatibility of this proposal. Hint - The parking lot is not a new use, but has existed for "x" number of years. How has it operated in the past and how will it operate differently in the future? 22. Response to Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria #6 - Address HOW this proposal is in compliance with this criteria, including all of the objectives. 23 . Provide a demolition site plan. Site plan is too busy with existing conditions and inconsistent information, which is confusing. 24. Response to Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria #5 - Address HOW the proposal meets the criteria, in as much detail as necessary, as the existing response does not address the criteria, especially one or more of the objectives. 25 . Response to Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria #3 - The reason for the request is to reduce parking to allow for the sale of the northern portion of the property for redevelopment in conformance with the MHDR District (most likely attached dwellings). 26. Parking lot designed with parking space stall length of 19 feet generally. Code minimum stall length requirement is 18 feet. May reduce stall length. 27. Response to Residential Infill Project criteria #6 - Revise Fredrica Street to Fredrica Avenue. Need to address landscape upgrades as an enhancement. 28. Response to Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria #2 - Address HOW this proposal is in compliance with the criteria (Downtown Redevelopment Plan and zoning). 29. Page 7 of the application, Affidavit to Authorize Agent, need to indicate under Douglas Dale's name his position title in General Telephone Company of Florida (president, secretary, etc.). 30. Comply with Downtown Design Guidelines of the Downtown Redevelopment Plan, including the requirement to screen parking from street rights -of -way (see page 84 of the Downtown Redevelopment Plan). 31 . Based on discussions with senior Planning management of this application, the existing, primary use of the building is deemed to be a "utility/infrastructure facility" and not an "office" use. "Utility/infrastructure facility" is defined as: "Utilities /infrastructure facility means an electric or gas substation, stormwater management facilities, water or wastewater pumping station, telephone repeater station or similar structure used as an intermediary switching, boosting, distribution or transfer station or lines for electricity, cable television, or telephone services between the point of generation and the end user, but not including satellite dish antennas, facilities for the handling of solid waste, or radio, television, or relay towers." Revise Description of Request on Page 1 of the application, Written Description narrative and any appropriate standards /information in the Land Use Summary on the site plan. 32. As an "utilities /infrastructure facility" use, such is listed as a Level 1, Flexible Standard Development (FLS) use in the Downtown District. However, since flexibility criteria #1 and #2 cannot be met, this cannot be processed as a FLS application. Since an "utilities /infrastructure facility" use is not listed as a Level 2, Flexible Development (FLD) use, such request must be processed as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project application. 33 . The Downtown District does not require any parking for an "utilities /infrastructure facility" use. The Parking Demand Study is still helpful, in that it determined the amount of parking needed for this use (105 spaces minimum). As such that there is no requirement for a minimum number of parking spaces, however, the applicant must provide for the parking needs of the existing use. The applicant may continue with the parking design on the north side or may modify it to reduce closer to present need. Staff would recommend not reducing the parking count too low, where it may impact future company parking needs where there is no ability to expand on -site parking. Development Review Agenda - Thursday, December 6, 2007 - Page 26 34 . Under the East Gateway District of the Downtown Redevelopment Plan, the maximum floor area ratio (FAR) is 0.55 and the maximum height is 50 feet. The calculation of the existing FAR is based on the entire land area between Betty Lane and Fredrica Avenue from Cleveland Street to Drew Street. The proposed FAR is based on the proposed land area (keeping in mind that the existing one -story building is being removed, which decreases the floor area square footage). In any case, the existing and proposed FAR exceeds the maximum of 0.55, which is deemed to be nonconforming to that permitted under the Downtown Redevelopment Plan. Additionally, while the actual building height is not provided, the application notes that the height exceeds the maximum of 50 feet. The existing height is also nonconforming to that permitted under the Downtown Redevelopment Plan. Recommend as part of the Level 2 application to also request a Termination of Status of Nonconformity for FAR and building height, under the provisions of Section 6 -109. The requirements under Section 6 -109.0 are: a. Perimeter buffers conforming to the requirements of section 3- 1202(C) shall be installed. b. Off - street parking lots shall be improved to meet the landscaping standards established in section 3- 1202(D). c. Any nonconforming sign, outdoor lighting or other accessory structure or accessory use located on the lot shall be terminated, removed or brought into conformity with this development code. d. The comprehensive landscaping and comprehensive sign programs may be used to satisfy the requirements of this section. 35 . Existing parking spaces on the west side of the building closest to Cleveland Street are located facing Betty Lane. Proposal relocates these parking spaces to be adjacent to the building. There are existing doors on the west side of the building, including required egress doors, which is not accounted for. The required egress doors cannot open into parking spaces. In any way, these existing spaces are situated within the Betty Lane right -of -way or are proposed to be relocated so that they must back into the right -of -way of Betty Lane. Recommend removing all of these spaces and drive aisle/backup area and replacing with landscaping. Planning staff cannot support retaining these spaces or drive aisle that would be in the Betty Lane right -of -way and requests the removal of all of these spaces and drive aisle/backup area and replacing such with landscaping. 36. The existing dumpster enclosure on the west side of the site requires truck pickup in two directions (from the north and from the south). This dumpster enclosure is located within the right -of -way of Betty Lane. Relocate it on -site to a location and with a design meeting City requirements acceptable to the Solid Waste Department. 37. On Page 1 of the application the project valuation has been listed as "N /A ". However, there will be a cost associated with constructing the proposed improvements. Recommend inserting a reasonable project valuation. Other: No Comments Notes: This application is insufficient to move forward to the CDB. Revise application package (plans and written material) and resubmit one original package and 14 copies to go back to future DRC. Development Review Agenda - Thursday, December 6, 2007 - Page 27 '/lap CO Aput 0 0 ?age 1 of 1 Clearwater eConnect GIS Palr Ounedi Clealp Be I lea i r La Le Le Higi Feat Add Parc Pa rc P *� Rail Ej Brid ,aft H ig i Stre Area Clea Sere Clea Sera Aeri. 200 ib tp:// pibLcgismycleam -Aci.cor-il3crvletrcom.esri esrinap.Esrir_nap ?S:-T iicel-�me =OV... 11/25/2007 Map Outpit 9 is Page 1 of 2 http: / /puHicgis.mN clrar-,-a- er. ccm /,-.ervlet /com.esri.esrimap.Esr: map?ServiceNar_e =OV... 11/25/2007 Map Oub -it 0 0 Page 1 of 2 1ttp: / /pu-D_icg_€ n-3clearw,--er. ccro/ sv nvle- icom. esr_. esrima -).Esri-nap ?S,-,rviceNarri, =OV.. 11/25/2007 Pinellas County Property Apr- ~iser Information: 15 29 15 65250 002 01110 Page 2 of 5 15 / 29 / 15 / 20058 / 000 1 0010 25 -Nov -2007 Jim Smith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 19:16:25 Ownership Information Uacant Property Use and Sales GTE FLORIDA INCORPORATED OBK: 04130 OPG: 1755 C/O PROPERTY TAX DEPT PO BOX 152206 IRUING TX 75015 -2206 EVAC: Nan -EUAC Comparable sales value as Prop Addr: 0 of Jan 1, 2007, based on Census Tract: 264.00 sales from 2005 - 2006: Sale Date OR Book /Page Price (Qual /UnQ) Vac /Imp 0 Plat Information 0 /1,974 4,130/1,755 90,000 (U) I 1925: Book 011 Pgs 016- 0 /1,970 3,436/ 357 15,000 (Q) I 0000: Book Pgs - 0 /1,970 3,324/ 346 7,000 (Q) I 0000: Book Pgs - 0 /0 0/ 0 0 { ) 2007 Value EXEMPTIONS Just /Market: 493,600 Homestead: NO Ownership % .000 Govt Exem: NO Use %: .000 Assessed /Cap: 493,600 Institutional Exem: NO Tax Exempt %: .000 Historic Exem: 0 Taxable: 493,600 Agricultural: 0 2007 Tax Information District: Cu Seawall: Frontage: Clearwater View: 07 Tax: 9,840.95 Land Size Unit Land Land Land Front x Depth Price Units Meth 07 Millage: 19.9371 1) 200 x 389 6.50 77, 800.00 S 07 Spec Asmt: .00 2) 0 x 0 .00 .00 3) 0 x 0 .00 .00 Without the Save - Our -Homes 4) 0 x 0 .00 .00 cap, 2007 taxes will be 5) 0 x 0 .00 .00 9,840.95 6) 0 x 0 . 00 . 00 Without any exemptions, 2007 taxes will be 9,840.95 Short Legal FAIR LANE ADD LOTS 1 THRU 9 INCL Description Building Information http : / /136.174.187.13/htbin/cgi- click ?o =1 &a =1 &b =1 &c =1 &r= .16 &s= 4 &t3 =1 &u= 0 &p =... 11/25/2007 S. Pinellas County Property Apr- °iser Information: 15 29 15 65250 002 0 ()' 0 15 / 2 / 15 / 20058 / 000 / 0010 Page 3 of 5 25 -Nov -2007 Jim Smith, CFA Pinellas COunty Property Appraiser 19:16:25 Vacant Parcel Property Use: 000 Land Use: i0 Vacant Extra FcaturOs Description Dimensions Price Units Value RCD Year 1) ASPHALT 55000 1.75 55,000 96,250 96,250 0 2) .00 0 0 0 0 3) .00 0 0 0 0 4) .00 0 0 0 0 5) .00 0 0 0 0 6) .00 0 0 0 0 TOTAL RECORD VALUE: 96,250 Map With Property Address (non- vacant) F*_1 F_*1 Fil ® ® FQ http: // 136.174.187.13 /htbin/cgi- click ?o =1 &a =1 &b =1 &c =1 &r= .16 &s= 4 &t3 =1 &u= 0 &p =... 11/25/2007 00 a b O O �Q A� b N O O N (�J >MFr3 l � M% C Tl '1 I are =1 ft EREDRI A AVENUE Tl '1 r� -9 Tl TI -9 Fj 7}r� �rQr rrl r'l Apr r`1- CQp x„r'1 <�'r x r'1q-_-4rri 7 M7-Q M- rT1 =v�r' fit- mn r2{ r) r ) �k c y r } t'y > {'S :� _ , Pimellas County Property Ap�ser Information: 15 29 15 65250 002 0 Page 5 of 5 Pinellas County Property Appraiser Parcel Information http: // 13 6.174.187.13 /htbin/cgi- click ?o =1 &a =1 &b =1 &c =1 &r= .16 &s= 4 &t3 =1 &u= 0 &p =... 11/25/2007 Pinellas County Property App- -user Information: 15 29 15 26658 000 ( "1 0 Page 2 of 5 15 / 29 / 15 / 12270 / 003 / 0010 25 -Nov -2007 Jim Smith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 19:16:44 Ownership Information Uacant Property Use and Sales GTE FLORIDA INCORPORATED OBK: 04287 OPG: 0825 C/O PROPERTY TAX SECTION PO BOX 152206 IRUIN6 TX 75015 -2206 EVAC: Non -EUAC Comparable sales value as Prop Addr: 0 of Jan 1, 2007, based on Census Tract: 264.00 sales from 2005 - 2006: 0 Sale Date OR Book /Page Price (Qual /UnQ) Vac /Imp Plat Information 0 /1,975 4,2871 825 80,000 (Q) I 1924: Book 008 Pgs 034- 0 /1,969 3,0461 490 44,000 (U) I 0000: Book Pgs - 0 /0 0/ 0 0 { ) 0000: Book Pgs - 0 /0 0/ 0 0 { ) 2007 Value EXEMPTIONS Just /Market: 358,300 Homestead: NO Ownership % .000 Govt Exem: NO Use %: .000 Assessed /Cap: 358,300 Institutional Exem: NO Tax Exempt %: .000 Historic Exem: 0 Taxable: 358,300 Agricultural: 0 2007 Tax Information District: Cu Seawall: Frontage: Clearwater View: 07 Tax: 7,143.46 Land Size Unit Land Land Land Front x Depth Price Units Meth 07 Millage: 19.9371 1) 510 x 110 6.50 56,455.71 S 07 Spec Asmt: .00 2) 0 x 0 .00 .00 3) 0 x 0 .00 .00 Without the Save -Our -Homes 4) 0 x 0 .00 .00 cap, 2007 taxes will be : 5) 0 x 0 .00 .00 7,143.46 6) 0 x 0 . 00 . 00 Without any exemptions, 2007 taxes will be 7,143.46 Short Legal BROOKWOOD TERRACE REVISED BLK 3, LOTS i THRU 10 INCL Description Building Information http: / /136.174.187.13 /htbin/cgi- click ?o =1 &a =1 &b =1 &c =1 &r= .16 &s= 4 &t3 =1 &u= 0 &p =... 11/25/2007 Pinellas County Property Apt —iser Information: 15 29 15 26658 000 On" 0 15 / 2 / 15 / 12270 / 003 / 0010 Page 3 of 5 25 -How -2007 Jim Smith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 19:16:44 Vacant Parcel Property Use: 000 Land Use; 10 �I;acant Extra F�a-tur�s Description Dimensions Price Units Value RCD Year 1) ASPHALT 40000 1.75 40,000 70,000 70,000 0 2) .00 0 0 0 0 3) .00 0 0 0 0 4) .00 0 0 0 0 5) .00 0 0 0 0 6) .00 0 0 0 0 TOTAL RECORD VALUE; 70,000 Map With Property Address (non- vacant) ®®® ❑RFq http: // 136 .174.187.13 /htbin/cgi- click ?o =1 &a =1 &b =1 &c =1 &r= .16 &s= 4 &t3 =1 &u= 0 &p =... 11/25/2007 Pinellas County Property Apr--- -i.ser Information: 15 29 15 26658 000 M' 0 10D Page 4 of 5 338e63 1 –T— L--319,-52 STS - EE T' I w 130lq 31 r 1325 DREAr RE DREW Ui z LU FREDFtICA LADY AVE MARY 0 + FR FR RICA LADY.. AV ESA AVE tw1ARY FIR tvt RY FREDR ICA AVE AVE l �k Q AVE j +C FR E1 E Fool FR Uj AV ESA L4 FIR tvt RY AVE FRE ICA Q AVE j FREDRICA AVE 1320 CLEVELAND ST FND II CLEVEL.NJ I z �T � 1/8 Mile Aerial Photograph (2002) http : //136.174.187.13/htbin/cgi- click ?o =1 &a =1 &b =1 &c =1 &r= .16 &s= 4 &t3 =1 &u= 0 &p =... 11/25/2007 Pinellas County Property A P ser Information: 15 29 15 26658 000 �0 Page 5 of 5 Pinellas County Property Appraiser Parcel Information http : / /136.174.187.13/htbin/cgi- click ?o =1 &a =1 &b =1 &c =1 &r= .16 &s= 4 &t3 =1 &u= 0 &p=... 11/25/2007 Pinellas County Property App-- -=ser Information: 15 29 15 12276 003 0' 11) Page 2 of 5 15 / 29 / 15 / 12270 / 003 / 0130 25 -Nov -2007 Jim Smith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 19:13:21 Ownership Information Non - Residential Property Address, Use, and Sales GTE FLORIDA INCORPORATED OBK: 03003 OPG: 0381 C/0 PROPERTY TAX SECTION PO BOX 152206 IRUIHG TX 75015 -2206 EVAC: Non -EUAC Comparable sales value as Prop Addr: 1280 CLEVELAND ST of Jan 1, 2007, based on Census Tract: 264.00 sales from 2005 - 2006: 0 Sale Date OR Book /Page Price {Qual /UnQ} Vac /Imp Plat Information 0 /0 0/ 0 0 { } 1924: Book 008 Pgs 034- 0 /0 01 0 0 { } 0000: Book Pgs - 0 /0 0/ 0 0 { } 0000: Book Pgs - 0 /0 0/ 0 0 { } 2007 Value EXEMPTIONS Just /Market: 1,930,000 Homestead: NO Ownership % .000 Govt Exem: NO Use %: .000 Assessed /Cap: 1,930,000 Institutional Exem: NO Tax Exempt %: .000 Historic Exem: 0 Taxable: 1,930,000 Agricultural: 0 2007 Tax Information District: CWD Seawall: Frontage: Clearwater Downtown Bev Bd View: 07 Tax: 40,341.25 Land Size Unit Land Land Land Front x Depth Price Units Meth 07 Millage: 20.9022 1} 0 x 0 12. 00 22,638. 31 S 07 Spec Asmt: .00 2} 0 x 0 .00 .00 3} 0 x 0 .00 .00 Without the Save -Our -Homes 4} 0 x 0 .00 .00 cap, 2007 taxes will be : 5} 0 x 0 .00 .00 40, 341.25 6} 0 x 0 . 00 . 00 Without any exemptions, 2007 taxes will be 40, 341.25 Short Legal BROOKWOOD TERRACE REVISED BLK 3, LOTS 13 THRU 18 Description IHCL Building Information http:// 136 .174.187.13 /htbin /cgi- scr3 ?o =1 &a =1 &b =1 &c =1 &r= .16 &s= 4 &t3 =1 &u= 0 &p =1... 11/25/2007 r /� Pinellas County Property Apr- iser Information: 15 29 15 12276 003 '10 Page 3 of 5 Property and Land Use Code descriptions 15 / 29 / 15 1 12270 003 0130 :01 25- Nov -2007 Jim Smith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 19:13:21 Commercial Card 01 of i Improvement Type; Offices Property Address; 1280 CLEUELANO ST Prop Use; 332 Land Use; 18 Structural Elcmcnts Foundation Special Footing Floor System Slab on Grade Exterior Wall Conc Block /Brick Height Factor 0 Party Wall None Structural Frame Concrete Reinforced Roof Frame Reinforced Concrete Roof Cover Built Up /Metal /Gyps Cabinet & Mill Minimum Floor Finish Uinyl Asbestos Tile Interior Finish Masonry Total Units 0 Heating & Air Heating &Cooling Splt Fixtures 18 Bath Tile Floor and Wall Electric Average Description Factor Shape Factor Rectangle 1) Quality Average 1.00 Year Built 1,974 Effective Age 26 Other Depreciation 0 Function Depreciation 10 Economic Depreciation 0 Sub Arras C omme r c i al E x t r a F cat ur o s Description Factor Area Units Description Factor Area 1) Base Area 1.00 18,700 7) . 00 0 2) Upper Stry Base Area .90 17,700 8) . 00 0 3) Utility .55 16,525 9) .00 0 4) Open Porch .30 175 10) .00 0 5) Canopy .25 136 11) .00 0 6) .00 .00 0 12) .00 0 C omme r c i al E x t r a F cat ur o s Map With Property Address (non- vacant) 010101131a� http: // 136 .174.187.131htbinlcgi- scr3 ?o =1 &a =1 &b =1 &c =1 &r= .16 &s= 4 &t3 =1 &u= 0 &p =1... 11/25/2007 Description Dimensions Price Units Value RCD Year 1) ASPHALT 40500SF 1.75 40,500 70,880 70,880 0 2) ELEU PASS 3 STOP 30,000.00 1 30,000 12,000 1,974 3) ELEU STOP 3 STOP 3,500.00 3 10,500 4,200 1,974 4) FENCE .00 100 0 0 2,001 5) FENCE .00 58 0 0 21001 6) .00 0 0 0 0 TOTAL RECORD VALUE; 87,080 Map With Property Address (non- vacant) 010101131a� http: // 136 .174.187.131htbinlcgi- scr3 ?o =1 &a =1 &b =1 &c =1 &r= .16 &s= 4 &t3 =1 &u= 0 &p =1... 11/25/2007 Pin^.11as County Property App-- '-,er Information: 15 29 15 12276 003 0' '11) FRE_DRACA kFREDCA 1320 CLEVELAND i Page 4 of 5 0 175 1285 ^95 EV LANG �L E'� T A� �j� LAN r z 13Gi� 1 a: . 5 L PA1Rf� 4 CLE1 AND Q� i 1/8 Mile Aerial Photograph (2002) http: // 136 .174.187.13 /htbin/cgi- scr3 ?o =1 &a =1 &b =1 &c =1 &r= .16 &s= 4 &t3 =1 &u= 0 &p =1... 11/25/2007 It,S F F� 'C r FR ED RICA. � ' FREDRICA L AVE FRE_DRACA kFREDCA 1320 CLEVELAND i Page 4 of 5 0 175 1285 ^95 EV LANG �L E'� T A� �j� LAN r z 13Gi� 1 a: . 5 L PA1Rf� 4 CLE1 AND Q� i 1/8 Mile Aerial Photograph (2002) http: // 136 .174.187.13 /htbin/cgi- scr3 ?o =1 &a =1 &b =1 &c =1 &r= .16 &s= 4 &t3 =1 &u= 0 &p =1... 11/25/2007 Pinellas County Property Apo ser Information: 15 29 15 12276 003 w Page 5 of 5 Pinellas County Property Appraiser Parcel Information Back to Search Page An explanation of this screen http: //136 .174.187.13 /htbin/cgi- scr3 ?o =1 &a =1 &b =1 &c =1 &r= .16 &s= 4 &t3 =1 &u= 0 &p =1... 11/25/2007 { ^Pinellas County Property Apr -ser Information: 15 29 15 12276 003 0 "0 Page 2 of 8 15 / 29 / 15 / 05250 / 402 / 0010 25 -Nov -2007 Jim Smith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 19:15:17 Ownership Information Non - Residential Property Address, Use, and Sales GTE FLORIDA INC OBK: 03008 OPG: 0542 C/O PROPERTY TAX SECTION PO BOX 152206 IRUING TX 75015 -2206 EVAC: Non -EUAC Comparable sales value as Prop Addr: 1280 CLEVELAND ST of Jan 1, 2007, based on Census Tract: 264.00 sales from 2005 - 2006: 0 Sale Date OR Book /Page Price {Qual /UnQ} Vac /Imp Plat Information 0 /0 0/ 0 0 { } 1924: Book 0o6 Pgs 059- 0 /0 01 0 0 { } 0000: Book Pgs - 0 /0 0/ 0 0 { } 0000: Book Pgs - 0 /0 0/ 0 0 { } 2007 Value EXEMPTIONS Just /Market: 5,540,000 Homestead: NO Ownership % .000 Govt Exem: NO Use %: .000 Assessed /Cap: 5,540,000 Institutional Exem: NO Tax Exempt %: .000 Historic Exem: 0 Taxable: 5,540,000 Agricultural: 0 2007 Tax Information District: CUD Seawall: Frontage: Clearwater Downtown Dev Bd View: 07 Tax: 115,798.1 Land Size Unit Land Land Land Front x Depth Price Units Meth 07 Millage: 20.9022 1} 200 x 200 12.00 40, 000.00 S 07 Spec Asmt: .00 2} 200 x 245 6.50 49,000.00 S 3} 0 x 0 .00 .00 Without the Save -Our -Homes 4} 0 x 0 .00 .00 cap, 2007 taxes will be 5} 0 x 0 .00 .00 115, 798.19 6} 0 x 0 . 00 . 00 Without any exemptions, 2007 taxes will be 115, 798.19 Short Legal PADGETT'S ESTATES SUB BLK B, LOTS i THRU 10 INCL Description LESS RD Building Information http://l 36.174.187.13/htbin/cgi- click ?o =1 &a =1 &b =1 &c =l &r= .16 &s= 4 &t3 =1 &u= 0 &p =... 11/25/2007 I Pinellas County Property Apr -iser Information: 15 29 15 12276 003 0`10 Page 3 of 8 • Building._l • Building 2 • Buildin-33 • Building-4 Building #1 15 / 29 / 15 / 05250 / 002 / 0010 :01 25- Nov -2007 Jim Smith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 19:15:16 Commercial Card 01 of 4 Improvement Type: Warehouse Property Address: 1280 CLEUIELAND ST Prop Use: 332 Land Use: 18 Stru�ctural Elsmsn-ts Foundation Special Footing Floor System Slab on Grade Exterior Wall Conc Block /Brick Height Factor 0 Party Wall None Structural Frame Concrete Reinforced Roof Frame Reinforced Concrete Roof Cover Built Up /Metal /Gyps Cabinet & Mill None Floor Finish Concrete Finish Interior Finish None Total Units 0 Heating & Air Cooling with Ducts Fixtures 0 Bath Tile None Value Electric Average Area Shape Factor Rectangle i. 00 Quality Average 7) Year Built 11971 Effective Age 25 Other Depreciation 0 Function Depreciation 10 Economic Depreciation 0 Sub Arsas Description Factor Area Value Description Factor Area 1) Base Area i. 00 1,344 7) . 00 0 2) .00 0 8) .00 0 3) .00 0 9) .00 0 4) .00 0 10) .00 0 5) .00 0 11) .00 0 6) .00 0 12) .00 0 Comm4ercial Extra FeatLirs Description Dimensions Price Units Value RCD Year 1) .00 0 0 0 0 2) .00 0 0 0 0 3) .00 0 0 0 0 4) .00 0 0 0 0 5) .00 0 0 0 0 6) .00 0 0 0 0 TOTAL RECORD VALUE: 0 Building #2 http: / /136.174.187.13/htbin/cgi- click ?o =1 &a =1 &b =1 &c =1 &r= .16 &s= 4 &t3 =1 &u= 0 &p =... 11/25/2007 _, Tinellas County Property Apr ° ^iser Information: 15 29 15 12276 003 01 '10 Page 4 of 8 15 / 29 / 15 / 65250 / 002 / 0010 :02 25 -How -2007 Jim Smith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 19:15:17 Commercial Card 02 of 4 Improvement Type: Offices Property Address: 1280 CLEVELAND ST Prop Use: 332 Land Use: 18 Structural EliBmonts Foundation Special Footing Floor System Slab on Grade Exterior Wall Conc Block /Brick Height Factor 0 Party Wall None Structural Frame Concrete Reinforced Roof Frame Reinforced Concrete Roof Cover Built Up/Metal /Gyps Cabinet & Mill Minimum Floor Finish Uinyl Asbestos Tile Interior Finish Masonry Total Units 0 Heating & Air Heating &Cooling Spit Fixtures 32 Bath Tile Floor and Wall Electric Average Description Factor Shape Factor Rectangle 1) Quality Average i.00 Year Built 1,953 Effective Age 30 Other Depreciation 0 Function Depreciation 10 Economic Depreciation 0 Sub AriBas C+ammorcial Extra F+BaturiBs Description Dimensions Description Factor Area RCD Description Factor Area 1) Base Area i.00 28,468 7) .00 0 2) Canopy .25 446 8) .00 0 3) 0 .00 0 9) .00 0 4) 0 .00 0 10) .00 0 5) 6) .00 0 11) .00 0 6) .00 0 12) .00 0 C+ammorcial Extra F+BaturiBs Description Dimensions Price Units Value RCD Year 1) ELEU PASS 40,000.00 1 40,000 16,000 1,981 2) ELEU STOP 3,500.00 4 14,000 5,600 1,981 3) .00 0 0 0 0 4) .00 0 0 0 0 5) .00 0 0 0 0 6) .00 0 0 0 0 TOTAL RECORD VALUE: 21,600 Building #3 http: / /136.174.187.13/htbin/cgi- click ?o =1 &a =1 &b =1 &c =1 &r=.16 &s= 4 &t3 =1 &u= 0 &p =... 11/25/2007 1, Tinellas County Property Apr-- -iser Information: 15 29 15 12276 003 0110 Page 5 of 8 15 / 29 / 15 / 05250 / 002 / 0010 :03 25 -Nov -2007 Jim Smith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 19:15:17 Commercial Card 03 of 4 Improvement Type: Offices Property Address: 1280 CLEVELAND ST Prop Use: 332 Land Use: 18 Structural E1omonts Foundation Special Footing Floor System Slab on Grade Exterior Wall Cone Block /Brick Height Factor 0 Party Wall None Structural Frame Concrete Reinforced Roof Frame Reinforced Concrete Roof Cover Built Up /Metal /Gyps Cabinet & Mill Minimum Floor Finish Uinyl Asbestos Tile Interior Finish Masonry Total Units 0 Heating & Air Heating &Cooling Spit Fixtures 60 Bath Tile Floor and Wall Electric Average Area Shape Factor Rectangle 1.00 Quality Average 7) Year Built 1,970 Effective Age 30 Other Depreciation 0 Function Depreciation 10 Economic Depreciation 0 Sub Aroas Description Factor Area Price Description Factor Area 1) Base Area 1.00 69,400 7) .00 0 2) .00 0 8) .00 0 3) .00 0 9) .00 0 4) . 00 0 10) , 00 0 5) .00 0 11) .00 0 6) .00 0 12) .00 0 CommiBrcial Extra F�atur�s Building #4 http : / /136.174.187.13 /htbin/cgi- click ?o =1 &a =1 &b =1 &c =1 &r= .16 &s= 4 &t3 =1 &u= 0 &p =... 11/25/2007 Description Dimensions Price Units Value RCD Year 1) ELEU PASS 5 STOP 30,000.00 2 60,000 24,000 1,970 2) ELEU PASS 5 STOP 30,000.00 1 30,000 12,000 1,970 3) ELEU STOP 5 STOP 3,500.00 5 17,500 7,000 1,970 4) ELEU STOP 5 STOP 3,500.00 10 35,000 14,000 1,970 5) .00 0 0 0 0 6) .00 0 0 0 0 TOTAL RECORD VALUE: 57,000 Building #4 http : / /136.174.187.13 /htbin/cgi- click ?o =1 &a =1 &b =1 &c =1 &r= .16 &s= 4 &t3 =1 &u= 0 &p =... 11/25/2007 ;, , Pinellas County Property App ser Information: 15 29 15 12276 003 (" 10 Page 6 of 8 15 1 29 1 15 1 05250 1 002 1 0010 :04 25- Nov -2007 Jim Smith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 19:15:18 Commercial Card 04 of 4 Improvement Type: Offices Property Address: 1280 CLEUELAHD ST Prop Use: 332 Land Use: 18 Structural Elcmcnts Foundation Special Footing Floor System Slab on Grade Exterior Wall Conc Block /Brick Height Factor 0 Party Wall None Structural Frame Concrete Reinforced Roof Frame Reinforced Concrete Roof Cover Built Up/Metal/Gyps Cabinet & Mill Minimum Floor Finish Uinyl Asbestos Tile Interior Finish Masonry Total Units 0 Heating & Air Heating &Cooling Spit Fixtures 20 Bath Tile Floor and Wall Value Electric Average Area Shape Factor Rectangle 1.00 Quality Average 7) Year Built 1,967 Effective Age 30 Other Depreciation 0 Function Depreciation 10 Economic Depreciation 0 Sub Aromas Description Factor Area Value Description Factor Area 1) Base Area 1.00 32,300 7) .00 0 2) .00 0 8) .00 0 3) .00 0 9) .00 0 4) .00 0 10) .00 0 5) .00 0 11) .00 0 6) .00 0 12) .00 0 Commercial Extra Fcaturos Description Dimensions Price Units Value RCD Year 1) ASPHALT 31850SF 1.75 31,850 55,740 55,740 0 2) FENCE 360LF 5.00 360 1,800 720 1,981 3) .00 0 0 0 0 4) .00 0 0 0 0 5) .00 0 0 0 0 6) .00 0 0 0 0 TOTAL RECORD VALUE: 56,460 Map With Property Address (non- vacant) 010111131�� http: / /136.174.187.13 /htbin/cgi- click ?o =1 &a =1 &b =1 &c =1 &r= .16 &s= 4 &t3 =1 &u= 0 &p =... 11/25/2007 Pinellas County Property App -iser Information: 15 29 15 12276 003 0' "0 Page 7 of 8 ,ET 124 7 fI 1275 GROVE 1277 GRT�� 2 BLNY ��� RAND Lc� 0 LID 1274 CLEVELAND ST z Q6 V ,4 ND ��528_J ELAD 22 F'REDRIC-A AVE 125�D C'LEVEPAN ST A< U rx C w ILL F VE L ELVE "LE AND CLEA !ZE: AN CLELAND ST D z r- I I I 1 11 1 11.1 1/8 Mile Aerial Photograph (2002) http: / /136.174.187.13/htbin/cgi- click ?o =1 &a =1 &b =1 &c =l &r= .16 &s= 4 &t3 =1 &u= 0 &p =... 11/25/2007 Pinellas County Property Aposer Information: 15 29 15 12276 003 4 Page 8 of 8 Pinellas County Property Appraiser Parcel Information http : / /l36.174.187.13/htbin/cgi- click ?o =1 &a =1 &b =l &c =l &r= .16 &s= 4 &t3 =1 &u= 0 &p =... 11/25/2007 CITY OF CLEARWATER NOTICE OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD PUBLIC HEARINGS The Community Development Board of the City of Clearwater, Florida, will hold public hearings on Tuesday, March 18, 2008, beginning at 1:00 PM, in the City Council Chambers, in City Hall, 3rd floor, 112 South Osceola Ave, Clearwater, Florida, to consider the following requests: NOTE: All persons wishing to address an item need to be present at the BEGINNING of the meeting. Those cases that are not contested by the applicant, staff, neighboring property owners, etc. will be placed on a consent agenda and approved by a single vote at the beginning of the meeting. 1. Gabash LLC is requesting Flexible Development (FLD) approval to construct a 15,498 sq ft medical clinic within the Downtown (D) District as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, pursuant to Community Development Code Sec 2- 903.C. (Proposed Use: Medical Clinic) at 610 E Druid Rd, 612 Druid Rd. 609 and 611 Pine St, and 715 South Ft Harrison Ave, Wallace's Add Blk 8, S Y2 of Blk 8 less W 200 ft, Wallace's Add Blk 4, Lots 1 -9 & all of Vac 1Oft Alley E of Lots 4 -9 & N % Vac & Mrs N.E. McMullen's Sub, Lot 1 & W 47'/ ft & E 2'h ft of Lot 2 & E 9 ft of Lot 3. Assigned Planner: Robert G. Tefft, Planner III. FLD2007 -12040 2. GTE Florida, Inc. (Verizon Office) is requesting Flexible Development approval (1) for the Termination of Status of Nonconformity for Floor Area Ratio [FAR] (1.27 FAR existing /proposed; where 0.55 FAR permitted today) and for building height (86 ft existing; where 50 ft height permitted today) in the Downtown District (East Gateway Character District), under the provisions of Sec. 6 -109; (2) to permit the improvement of the existing site and parking areas for a "utilities /infrastructure facility" use in the Downtown District, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Sec. 2- 903.C; and (3) to permit Nonresidential Off - Street Parking in the Medium High Density Residential (MHDR) District with deviations to reduce the side (north) setback from 10 to 5 ft (to pavement) and to allow the placement of landscaping on the inside of the buffer fence /wall along the north and south side of the property, as a Residential Infiil Project, under the provisions of Sec. 2- 404.F. (Existing Use: Utility /Infrastructure Facility) at 1280 Cleveland St, Fair Lane Add, Lots 1 -9 incl; Padgett's Estates Sub Blk B, Lots 1 -10 incl less road; Brookwood Terrace Revised Blk 3, Lots 13 -18 incl. Assigned Planner: Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Planner III. FLD2007- 11035 Interested parties may appear and be heard at the hearing or file written notice of approval or objection with the Planning Director or City Clerk prior to the hearing. Any person who decides to appeal any decision made by the Board or Council, with respect to any matter considered at such hearings, will need to request a record of the proceedings and, for such purpose, may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based per Florida Statute 286.0105. Community Development Code Sec 4 -206 states that party status shall be granted by the Board in quasi-judicial cases if the person requesting such status demonstrates that s /he is substantially affected. Party status entitles parties to personally testify, present evidence, argument and witnesses, cross- examine witnesses, appeal the decision and speak on reconsideration requests, and needs to be requested and obtained during the case discussion before the CDB. b. An oath will be administered swearing in all persons giving testimony in quasi - judicial public hearing cases. If you wish to speak at the meeting, please wait to be recognized, then state and spell your name and provide your address. Persons without party status speaking before the CDB shall be limited to three minutes unless an individual is representing a group in which case the Chairperson may authorize a reasonable amount of time up to 10 minutes. Five days prior to the meeting, staff reports and recommendations on the above requests will be available for review by interested parties between the hours of 8:30 a.m. and 4:30 p.m., weekdays, at the City of Clearwater, Planning Department, 100 S. Myrtle Ave., Clearwater, FL 33756. Please contact the case presenter, at 562 -4567 to discuss any questions or concerns about the project and /or to better understand the proposal and review the site plan. Michael Delk Cynthia E. Goudeau, MMC Planning Director City Clerk City of Clearwater P.O. Box 4748, Clearwater, FL 33758 -4748 NOTE: Applicant or representative must be present at the hearing. A COPY OF THIS AD IN LARGE PRINT IS AVAILABLE IN OFFICIAL RECORDS AND LEGISLATIVE SERVICES. ANY PERSON WITH A DISABILITY REQUIRING REASONABLE ACCOMMODATION IN ORDER TO PARTICIPATE IN THIS MEETING SHOULD CALL (727) 562 -4093 WITH THEIR REQUEST. To learn more about presenting to Clearwater boards and City Council, go to http:// clearwater .granicus.com /ViewPublisher.php ?view id =11 and click on "Resident Engagement Video." You can also check the informational video out from any Clearwater public library. Ad: 03/06/08 A E M ERFAHRUNG LLC PO BOX 45-2124 MIAMI FL 33245 - AUSTIN MEDICAL CTR INC 3389 CLARINE WAY E DUNEDIN FL 34698 - 9439 BAY REAL ESTATE INVESTORS WEISS, MARY L THE 1744 N BELCHER RD STE 200 CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 1305 CANADA CALVARIO, ALBERTO CALVARIO, DEBORA 20140 EAGLE GLEN WAY ESTERO FL 33928 - 3051 CASTAGNA LAW FIRM 611 DRUID RD E STE 710 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3947 DELP, MICHAEL DELP, SUSAN C 516 JASMINE WAY CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3940 DRUID ROAD 611 DRUID RD E STE 105 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3948 FIFTY OAKS REALTY LLC 1173 LONG BOW LN CLEARWATER FL 33764 - HAROLD COURT TOWNHOMES LLC 2506 S MACDILL AVE TAMPA FL 33629 - 7261 FLD2007- 12040; 163 AMSOUTHBANK 3000 GALLERIA TOWER STE 1 BIRMINGHAM AL 35244 - 2315 BACH, MICHAEL BACH, PATTI 4176 MYSTIC CT SAN JOSE CA 95124 - 3327 BOTANICAL & HERBAL RESOURCES 805 S FT HARRISON AVE CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3901 CARPENTER, JANA Q THE 612 HARBOR IS CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1801 CREDITIQ INC 611 DRUID RD E # 405 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3935 DEXTER PROPERTIES 612 DRUID RD E CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3912 FERRARA TECHNOLOGY PARTNERS 611 DRUID RD E # 704 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3939 FULLER, JOYCE E THE 639 PONCE DE LEON BLVD CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 1018 HARRITY, MICHELLE 803 S FORT HARRISON AVE CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3901 ASHRAF, BESSADA DMP PA 3184 CRESCENT OAKS BLVD TARPON SPRINGS FL 34688 - 7610 BATT, HOWARD C 611 DRUID RD E # 712 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3931 BRIDGETON INVESTMENTS LLC 611 DRUID RD E # 201 & 202 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3959 CARRINGTON & CARRINGTON PA 619 TURNER ST CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5314 CSX TRANSPORTATION INC 500 WATER ST JACKSONVILLE FL 32202 - 4423 DRUHILL PROF CTR CONDO ASSN DRUID RD CLEARWATER FL 33756 - FETTIG, ALBERT G 524 JASMINE WAY CLEARWATER FL 33756 - HAMMESFAHR FAMILY LAND TRUST 600 DRUID RD CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3912 HENDRIX, SCOTT D HENDRIX, RANNIE D 221 GREENWOOD DR WEST PALM FL 33405 - HEYE, HANS F HORNE, THOMAS L KEDAN, ELITE 611 DRUID RD E STE 200 HORNE, MICHELE B 2354 HADDON HALL PL CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3946 PO BOX 3009 CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 7510 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - KEDAN, ELLA THE KENIG, EDWARD LAWFORD, KENNETH 2354 HADDON HALL PL KENIG, STANISLAWA LAWFORD, MARY CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 7510 606 WELLS CT # 201 CLORAGH COTTAGE CLORAGH RD CLEARWATER FL 33756 - TIBRADDEN DUBLIN 16 00000 - IRELAND LEWIS, CATHERINE 553 JASMINE WAY CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3917 MC CLURE, MICHAEL W MC CLURE, SANDRA K 606 DRUID RD E CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3912 NICHOLS, DEAN E NICHOLS, ANN C 119 POINCIANA LN LARGO FL 33770 - 2662 OLD CLEARWATER CITY FLATS COND 401 CORBETT ST #110 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - LINETSKY, LIDIA LINETSKY, FELIX S 611 DRUID RD E # 302 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3919 MINES, JONATHAN MINES, CARLEN 505 DRUID RD E CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3909 O'BRIEN, MICHAEL J LIVING TRUS 200 N RIVER LN # 403 GENEVA IL 60134 - PANTELIDES, GUS K 611 DRUID RD # 703 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3939 MADDALUNA, JOHN J 813 HARBOR OAK LN CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3933 MS CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION INC 926 S MYRTLE AVE CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3918 OHANA ENTERPRISES INC 201 S LINCOLN AVE . CLEARWATER FL 33756 - PATCH, JAMES M PATCH, SHARON E 825 HARBOR OAK LN CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3933 PAUL, JASON PERFECTLY BALANCED BOOKS INC PHILLIPS, CRAIG 845 HARBOR OAK LN 611 DRUID RD E # 401 PHILLIPS, PEGGY CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3933 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3920 611 DRUID RD E #707 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3947 PHILLIPS, J WAYNE PHILLIPS, BRIDGET M 2811 SABER DR CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 1122 PINELLAS COUNTY 315 COURT ST CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5165 RELIGIOUS COMMUNITY SERVICES RESNIK, ROBERT 1 3517 SHORELINE CIR 503 ML KING JR AVE S # 4 PALM HARBOR FL 34684 - 1727 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5607 RODRIGUEZ, ROSALIA C 418 LEEWARD IS CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2309 SAAD, FATHY Z SHENODA, SAMIRA S 528 JASMINE WAY CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3940 QUARTETTI, RALPH W QUARTETTI, BERNADINE J 2040 MICHIGAN AVE NE ST PETERSBURG FL 33703 - 3408 ROBINSON, A G ROBINSON, ANN S 707 DRUID RD E CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3951 SERENITY CLUB CLEARWATER INC 631 TURNER ST CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5314 SEUFERT, DENISE A SHAMSAH, H SHIDI TRUST SHAUGHNESSY, PATRICK J BRUNVAND, BJORN E 611 DRUID RD E STE 301 HAYNES, SHERYL M 615 TURNER ST CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3919 PO BOX 1773 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5314 LARGO FL 33779 - 1773 SHEHU, FATBARDH SHOHAM, ILANA SILVER, LESLIE 809 HARBOR OAK LN 815 HARBOR OAK LN SILVER, GILDA CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3933 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3933 816 HARBOR OAK LN CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3936 SKOU, JAN ERIK KNUDSGAARD SPIRIDELLIS, NIKOLAOS T STEWART, BRUCE TYRIVEGEN 19 STEWART, DONNA 170 SAND KEY ESTATES DR JESSHEIM 2050 00000 _ CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2981 841 HARBOR OAK LN NORWAY CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3933 SZABO, BRUCE TOLBA, ALAN TOLBA MICHAEL A TOMAK, TYRONE J , 611 DRUID RD E STE 717 7870 DANA POINT RD CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3947 837 HARBOR OAK LN LAS VEGAS NV 89117 - 1927 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3933 TOWN HOMES OF HARBOR OAKS TULLY, JOE TURNER, GERALDINE C HOME TULLY, CYNTHIA 801 S FORT HARRISON AVE 4131 GUNN HIGHWAY 611 DRUID RD # 407 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3901 TAMPA FL 33618 - CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3935 TWEAN SUBSIDIARY VANDERNOOT, PETER G WACHOVIA BANK NA PO BOX 4739 VANDERNOOT, CATHLEEN G PO BOX 36246 SYRACUSE NY 13221 - 4739 606 WELLS CT # 446 CHARLOTTE NC 28236 - 6246 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - WELLS COURT DEV LLC WELLS COURT DEV LLC WHITEHOUSE, ETHEL L 401 CORBETT ST # 110 401 CORBETT ST # 110 603 TURNER ST CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 7302 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 7302 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5314 WINTERS, ELISE K YOUSSEF, AIDA N REVOCABLE YOUSSEF, NANCY S TRUST 609 TURNER ST TRUST 536 JASMINE WAY CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5314 PO BOX 6062 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3940 CHESTERFIELD MO 63006 - 6062 YOUSSEF, TAMER S 2001 TRUST JAY MYERS, MYERS & ASSOCIATES CLEARWATER NEIGHBORHOODS PO BOX 508 ARCHITECTURE COALITION PRESIDENT JOE FRITZ INDIAN ROCKS BEACH FL 33785 - 9170 OAKHURST ROAD, SUITE 313 P.O. BOX 8204 0508 SEMINOLE, FLORIDA 33776 CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758 HARBOR OAKS NEIGHBORHOOD BACH, MICHAEL ASSOCIATION BAIR, DAVID M PRESIDENT BOB FRITZ BACH, PAT 17389 US HIGHWAY 19 N 4176 SAN 9 320 MAGNOLIA DRIVE, MYSTI C CLEARWATER FL 33764 - CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 SAN JOSE CA 95124 - 3327 BATT, HOWARD C BEKIRI, REIS BOWERS, MAX A JR 611 DRUID RD E # 712 BEKIRI, MAZES BOWERS, JANE W CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3931 539 JASMINE WAY 1474 MANATEE CIR CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3917 TARPON SPRINGS FL 34689 - BURWELL, -ROBERT A SR CAITAK, DORIS CARPENTER, JANA Q THE BURWELL, MERRY JUNE MARTINAZZI, LUCA 612 HARBOR IS 680 ISLAND WAY # 410 702 HAMILTON CRES CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1801 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1983 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - CARRINGTON & CARRINGTON PA 619 TURNER ST CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5314 CONTI, DIANA 525 JASMINE WAY CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3917 DI POLITO, DOREEN 420 DRUID RD W CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3812 DURKEE, KEITH W DURKEE, PHYLLIS L 416 JASMINE WAY CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3822 CASTAGNA LAW FIRM 611 DRUID RD E STE 710 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3947 COPE, WINSTON T COPE, CANDACE GLOGER 433 DRUID RD W CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3854 DUBE, ROBERT C DUBE, SUSAN LEE K 416 DRUID RD W CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3812 EQUITY TRUST CO FBO ROBERT A BURWELL JR IRA 815 S FORT HARRISON AVE CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3901 FIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH FOTIOU, ZACHARIAS 411 TURNER ST FOTIOU, MERCEDES CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5328 517 JASMINE WAY CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3917 GOULD, RICHARD TREVOR GOULD, DIANE CHRISTINE 513 JASMINE WAY CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3917 HEMERICK, F DAVID 902 S FORT HARRISON AVE CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3904 HOLMES, JENNIFER PO BOX 592 PARK RIDGE IL 60068 - 0592 HAMMESFAHR FAMILY LAND TRUST 600 DRUID RD CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3912 HENDRIX, SCOTT D HENDRIX, RANNIE D 221 GREENWOOD DR WEST PALM FL 33405 - HUTCHESON, DAVID D HUTCHESON, WILLIAM C JR 11 FOUNTAIN SQ CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 1451 CLARK, ALICE D THE 9312 S LONGWOOD DR CHICAGO IL 60620 - 5639 DEEGAN, ROBERT H 609 OAK AVE # 6 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5207 DUNN, THOMAS COMIANO, RONALD F 843 S FT HARRISON AVE CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3901 FARRIS, STEVEN FARRIS, LAUREN 472 HARBOR DR S INDIAN ROCK BEACH FL 33785 - 3156 GIOTAKIS, BOB 2401 VIRGINIA ST PARK RIDGE IL 60068 - 2252 HANGHOFER, ADELHEID G 500 JASMINE WAY CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3940 HEYE, HANS F 611 DRUID RD E STE 200 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3946 JOSEPH, THOMAS A JOSEPH, DUNIA E 612 WOODLAKE DR LOUISVILLE KY 40245 - KAUF, OTTO KERR, RUTH THEL KIRBY, JOHN 0 REGINATO, WERNER KIRBY, ANNE 501 JASMINE WAY 701 OAK AVE CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3917 1344 RANCHWOOD DR CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5226 CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 2816 LAY, JERRY MADDALUNA, JOHN J MARION, BRANDON L 106 W 5TH ST # 3 813 HARBOR OAK LN MARION, ANGELA M COVINGTON KY 41011 - 1404 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3933 849 HARBOR OAK LN CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3933 MC CLURE, MICHAEL W MC KEOWN, RUTH E LIV TRUST MIHOPOULOS, ALEXANDER MC CLURE, SANDRA K MC KEOWN, RUTH E THE MIHOPOULOS, ELEONORA 606 DRUID RD E 432 DRUID RD W 545 JASMINE WAY CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3912 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3817 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3917 MINES, JONATHAN MINKOFF HOLDINGS LTD MOORES, REBECCA J MINES, CARLEN YEHUDAH LP 201 HOWARD DR 505 DRUID RD E 403 EDGEWOOD AVE BELLEAIR BEACH FL 33786 - 3533 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3909 CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 5706 PAITSEL, RICHARD PANTELIDES, GUS K PINELLAS BD OF PUB INST PAITSEL, PATRICIA 611 DRUID RD # 703 PO BOX 2942 853 HARBOR OAK LN CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3939 LARGO FL 33779 - 2942 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3933 PARKS, ERIC D PATCH, JAMES M PAUL, JASON PARKS, RENEE A PATCH, SHARON E 845 HARBOR OAK LN 11347 OYSTER BAY CIR 825 HARBOR OAK LN CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3933 NEW PORT RICHEY FL 34654 - 4462 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3933 PINELLAS DENTAL ARTS PRIOR, HARVEY PURVIS, JEANNE R 650 E TARPON AVE PRIOR, JOANNE PURVIS, WILLIAM R TARPON SPRINGS FL 34689 - 4202 427 DRUID RD W 700 HAMILTON CRES # 3 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3854 CLEARWATER-FL 33756 - 5360 RUIZ, MIGUEL SCHAEFER, JAMES 0 SKOU, JAN ERIK KNUDSGAARD 811 S FORT HARRISON AVE SCHAEFER, NANCY E TYRIVEGEN 19 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3901 430 JASMINE WAY JESSHEIM 2050 00000 - CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3822 NORWAY STANLEY, HAROLD N STEVENS, KAREN STEWART, BRUCE STANLEY, GYNETH S STEWART, DONNA 424 JASMINE WAY 421 DRUID RD W CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3822 841 HARBOR OAK LN CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3854 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3933 SOTOS, ELAINE SPIRIDELLIS, NIKOLAOS T THOMPSON, PATTI 8507 W NORMAL 170 SAND KEY ESTATES DR 705 OAK AVE NILES IL 60714 - CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2981 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5226 TAGGART, JANE K TAM PARTNERS LLC TEMME, R WAYNE 401 HAMILTON CRES 1 RED MILL LN 421 JASMINE WAY CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5330 DARIEN CT 06820 - 3612 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3821 SUBRAMANIAN, ARUNACHALAM SUBRAMANIAN, ARUNACHALAM WAGSTAFF, MARY LOU SUBRAMANIAN, VALLI SUBRAMANIAN, VALLI 418 JASMINE WAY 800 S FORT HARRISON AVE 8777 LAUREL DR CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3822 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3902 PINELLAS PARK FL 33782 - 4345 WAYLAND, ROBERT E CHALACHE, NAJEH F 905 S FT HARRISON AVE CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3903 YOUSSEF, TAWFIK, REVOCABLE TRU PO BOX 6062 CHESTERFIELD MO 63006 - 6062 WILLIAMS, TODD WILLIAMS, JENNIFER 430 DRUID RD W CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3817 WRIGHT, OLIN S III WRIGHT, TONI ' 423 DRUID RD W CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3854 Wells, Wayne From: David @ddurfee.com [ddurfee @tampabay.rr.com] Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2008 9:29 AM To: waynewells @myclearwater.com Subject: FLD200711O35 March 13, 2008 City of Clearwater Community Development Board Re; FLD200711035 Gentlemen: I am receipt of your notice on the proposed hearing by GTE Florida, Inc Verizon Office. My property is adjoining this property seeking approval for the changes, located at 22 N. Fredrica Drive. This is the only residence that is on that block. I have spoke to Wayne Wells and to the GTE Attorney and Allen Murphy the company that Verizon hired to prepare the modification to this property's use. Except for the item noted below dealing with the electrical power to my property, I don't have any objection to the improvements. With regard to the moving of my electrical service, it is my understanding that this is totally been requested by the City of Clearwater. The electric service comes into my house at the rear of the property and has been that way for over 40 years. As you might not be aware of, this block was once residential property and it appears that Florida Power has an easement along the back side of the property. I have asked for a detailed drawing on how my power will be routed if this is changed. To date, I have not been able to get said drawing of the proposed electrical rerouting of service. Having just upgraded my electrical service, I don't want to have lead in wires place over the house structure. It appears to me that this concern should be addressed prior to the approval process or the City of Clearwater should change there stance on rerouting my power connection. I will be traveling on March 18, 2008 and would like this letter entered into the official records. Given that I am the only adjacent and abutting property owner with concerns, this should be considered when deciding this case. Sincerely yours, David Durfee 10302 Carroll Shores Place Tampa, Florida 33612 Phone 813 334 -1059 David Durfee 813 334 -1059 Wells, Wayne From: David @ddurfee.com [ddurfee @tampabay.rr.com] Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2008 9:48 AM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: Fwd: FLD200711035 LI FLD20071103 David Durfee 813 334 -1059 POLE RELOCATION {{ �a FREDRICA AVENUE 19 _ ��— — �E (�zvrd} :Aaa� l a� os— — — f�tari�AV, ata.a ,as �' _ g P BAR �srrrsasr} -AVM -a As X O — !g 's!, C• '1 i9 66 �'• !S, io. sd ¢ . '. » lf+. a, ^ x" — ti !8 �AiHB �f3f �� � a gl 3i1N3A VBI�B3 s! 9l sl s! 24 WHITE � 3ilN O vmaiw - =•d lea �'. � � � 2> ?�?r �,• �• ,�,�• z�1Z' `'y��' `'•Jfy' tid�' ��d� �,;�' a�'v �' �`'� y' �'�•�' �� �' �'`�' �$ '�' �'•' �•• � � �. /ya gg a a X d ! d d d d d (! vd vl `d 50 d° 0 1 J® �0 9 30 FDOT �`,, e G` J� 6" VERTICAL # T% �` -r d STO S N. �'s. ! �l l �. HANDICAP RAM TO 30k�31C Y }3-131�tdo3SA3a IN 4 �� �z ge $2 �� �� �� �� CURB R1 1 c z a.00t� 'N' o-ot ` . rh.st,oaaas a,o•0oz 41,avooz M.600.0as- z ? z -20 ` ' ti �Atz sv,zo'sai•''•�z . o m` :3d ° ° 20 3. aaaaas �z z o! _ ° ° - _ Z/� Sep z k0tt �T 2i,05 4, B.Q, — NC4 Sao a`.% a : BAS ?L� ION ° x N.GS } 4OS — — �s ,Ly ,' SCALE: 1" =30' x - a 25 SETBACK ° a� tf t a - .,�'£3 I a X t� nL { _ iS✓f131 Ck.1z Oa3 lYfa O'.Ln3 , ,' »a 20 20's a a ly. 3 }tlhii3l 41840 *A 1Vkf II�ti� 1 0 T Zola A A0 E$ 3 "t ® 9 9 :' �_.�• £,3xar3 a o I (MHDR) 25 REQ D' 0 REQ D ca �`� 7, 5 REV ID SETBACK J1 v OEM 1 y s ry, ° T SETBACK (MHDR} g �2 ��`�� SETBACK ¢ z . �' (M DR) E EXIT ( m o I ga vl.�� 1 >' _ x x k� �. BRICK ENCLOSURE I— J 4 y — — — — RELOCATE 21 v TO BE REMOVED OR � X �`�lz� - SI HT TRIANGLES' ¢ - e �! t � x o ELECTRICAL ° , .tip �z 1 m o LOWERED TO 30" IN 4att — �. ea ,_ g - `X X F� —o-- — :s ti w � HEIGHT T� � - 1 Q o � - OrLz1j � ®� .� POWER x �-- -� o tv o x�� o e- N''� {�k. ¢a TO HOUSE 4 E EXIT m F- w CONC. >- �L��" I , F- CD L /yam ss� i,. ca v I 00. Yi5 d ect t �. 2 d t : Vd r k"' ,� L $ X U I� Q Q a o FLUME (TYP} _ �d r� ° I — < o � _' m `1h' 3,4Ii r,,.,� °� Off`'' a O tY -y:; AA O a O C�x.es (� x }r x .I Cii•-•' Lam! O `7" �• ti cam " �; .•�� 4 HIGH ��� s 6 VERTICAL z�� o _ a e� =_ � SOLID FENCE se�"a ca CURB = 54.8 - i� $k Xti' CD ®� 1ti - . Q " " ry U 't 1 s�2 l!• 4,® d c c' > N !c'x I- X Eli X U r 9' Q� `9 m ° X z C,h ts'! i -' C1 IZV CV l A �' D `! O — `C' C. QJ V. �, � �� � � �• 4 HIGH �_ - � � � �s `� � j -I I N L`' ` ' o °� `l IRE EXIT uAtt 0 N x zJd !� � SOLID FENCE rr I a�, : c �- .( > �• 5 REQ D SETBACK OVERHEAD `� °OWE LINE TO BE o� a J -� I " _ REMOVED PER CITY OF CLEARWATER (MHDR) 1 :.� s L0 x o ti aAS x �°� ���� NEW STORM �^ '' 13d z .N x x ti x SEWER MdQas Ne $ ..:. ti moo•oot MH R h1,n,Lo.aas � � gas d€s I watt tt a� — ?tom 1 s� — ti f d MHDR ti U I ._,..� -� tt�3 �v�a cos gas re N ,...- a; cos _.- . .,._ . .� ., >.... _ .,_ ,.. .. _ CS { i. s '°�"' ..... - . r r:: ? _ --�i - :.' : �•: _ ... {--° S.SZ FXib'A1a&.RS S3LVIS3 Lt�lotla 91tL M Uj T. ..,_t v__ _ g ~_ _ . s . _ _ D._ � ot, s sao � a/t isv3 t- iyRx J . D J , 01.. L t�k'1SiN ans V � 1043 3 M Js'• • i O d. t, `�l,• !• d. '�l•• �1 . -Rr U (%a LEI // 3f{i a1M Lt at,Y 23' t t tl tip` oE X - , `max Q� X r v F ® ® �- W tttL,}�, ,A� i0 y {7 ^ \ ' . - 'rte _ s .°y' EN - c. " ',A•, q � 4 •cF G 3�Bc" `�� - 'Y� fA V 11 �N ' -.. j -B. /N ar LO mo - �W •v x x a - / IUI =� 'd- �`.^c' 1,W .s ii•- X tf) > ' X x X x ti eo X W .! EXISTING 6— Q� (6 N � w h- q o Q `� - 01 �'i X 1 ¢ate-- C� R•�1• leer � ��', VERTICAL CURB -=d'• ("�j x ca a a a a zn•u e� - tN 16�y W ti� s,, g, s�.. x 1 w ° 9 x . 9 12 5 14 - d _, c' o 11 � �• 6i'• 9 �, ca s— vi ti • 9 o , _ _ 4 0.s z ' X �' !,� `� °�' � �, fi �, x � ,� t°° -°'1 � CONSTRUCT NEW � o � s X x 24 ZONING MHDR LL_ ' }` 12 x TYPE E GRATE INLET LL_ x- " T •,-+1 A °Y m u: =- i 24'd !" €s <P s s X - F e C-0 CITY �_ X �s �`� 0- 12 !� 9 K~ ;' a - VS i 2 AP LAN' x•N'C t P '_ — c T �X * �• ¢` • ®4 a ,� `A. -7' Gam. -voi ` ,�` lea: ,. !!• L •�' \0' '�` N ° tv ! LL? F— ."� • �`c'' ! n . �x c,,�' J -WHEEL STOP (TYI �� Q�9 qqg 05� y,�,�, s� Cn K Ic .11W Ueel y t' a ,e+. '' ' 3 4 N .� ` ,1 X15 a s , !� a- - a ,� X' a x 1a 4 �,�, �� a tL ¢ xQ I p N �- x , ° 1 \ \ \ 1 \ \ `� = ` z t"- ° m ® CITY OF CLEARW TE LLJ x N -` �� `� Q \ `'� \ ` - 4 \ \ } ° cn CD v 4 F- _j s : LANMN DE ° BY /:�,?� �!. _'_ t ° J:��' O• m N•:r F., `�h,^�� - `�!�� ,�• cy� , ® -" ,� ; ; e4 ,�• -� Q Q m m AT Q \ \ , \ \ to I— 1— x I It HIGH'. \ \ \ _ 24 : �, ,,� z �• v� l�yb� SOLID FENCE \ \ \ \ `. \ \' \'.. Mt-= + to w ro �ti�* p ® d s! ��, U ti �° Q 1 °'� `�\ \ \ \' '� \ : r e cn Q t— u Q c W 4— I :: 6 �ti g xtiox 6 L, Ls l U Z x I x �x '�\ \ \\ \\ \\ \`. \ \ \\ J�, 6a, VERTICAL ° `�o m LAND USE SUMMARY cy \ `� \ \ ' \ �. CURB ' .. SI HT TRIANGLES . ail m -N �r� ,:. N Ncn , doh N� `� = 2' kLj �,1 TRI.AN GLES 24' b :: �° = p `� .- ,._ • �`�£i 3u Existing 21 D (Downtown) 1 : , ' �,`, @ �B• �� a 4 1 ' , t, $ c \ \`9ii• ® \ \ \ �9• •�a. ! - -' ' '' Zi' R ediurn -i Density esidential = $�: \3 1' s x q- - • �t� a : tY ) � �', �7 4 X ti6�\ \ 25� �oQ 1 �6 \X �5° RESURFACE 5' LANDSCAPE I Site Area: 3.33 Acres (145,135 sf) Ifns) �sz,s�oo>� 20 i'' 25 REQ D aaoz w <saozs cata'eL££ a'at�a 20 20 ].9zsRaayxl x a ,x BUFFER -- �', ORIGINAL nA5 �t'o a?a Zr °r �; C,3 Q— PR OS��D �t / �ry a H RECEIVED }� � ° SETBACK MHDR Ix- istA La Use: C D Central Business District �u �d � ( } � ?� (Central High) ) "I'll" any aA�' � ,��' � ` 20 `,. '� '££ts 'sa a� arrt tt/s t�'v a a x'31 0 . a ,�• aat� i rt�;t� .� - '�+. h eot �a 11 7ro � - 20 20 ::: � � .�.: • . � . • .. - v `-rat �a `sc££ re'o x�t a 1AtdL"i M%kE AON31Y?d lYt e. 0 R EQ D SETBACK ( ,, /a �! 1 (y F y ry (� _. ~i 23A5 3j+ 8, ®. !S•' SSiC_ 11 f G ll ^. . .I cK0.( ® — - -- ..- .:: .. ...... ... .. ° :. .. '-- - -'. -: ' ' ' -'..:: -. � - - •`s '�'•.' ' • ��, ?. � NINC DEPARTMENT x a vd .- CITY OF CL WATER . .. Existing 86 849 sf 1.29 F.A.R. �•, �• �, = N !l�- � BETTY LANE �' �° '' � �:• �• ®!. �•. ` � ham• � �•'� �• � : � Jl. �, ;� : � � �, �• � � � � 9 ( ) x- - - �- , _ �" ,s �' �`,���BETTY LANE s •�• �• �,•.� ••�,•• � � � � <..r ��� ��"�• ^�'�°' �' � � — ---� -- — GEN E AL NOTES �' pan -o -xAY: (rxr� �J 60tr -c -AV: (�} �g s Proposed 185,184 sf 1.27 F.A.R. ^ ' ! ?� p ( ) � m, �• � REMOTE EXISTING � � c� BETTY LANE STOP SIGN STOP BAR 6 VERTICAL y 4'M2� � tA�€ALl) 1. EXISTING PARKING LOT WILL BE MILLED, 1,665 SF BUILDING ffi REFUSE AREA OVERLAID WITH NEW ASPHALT AND STRIPED STOP SIGN STOP BAR Maxim 0.40 � R1 -1 24" WHITE CURB R1 -1 24" WHITE �s CUT AND CAP ALL TO BE REMOVED BETTY LANE AS SHO ar ga e aired None re wired for Utili astructure Use - M cn ¢9 UTILITIES RI E q q w N �a jj 2. EXISTING GRADES AND FLOW PATTERNS WILL Par g Study (August 2007) demonstrated 105 spaces `� "' "' 00 o # r (n ® EXISTING ASPHALT IS TO BE REMAIN LEGEND (D) DOWNTOWN X-� EXISTING GRADE °tk (MHDR) MEDIUM -HIGH DENSITY 33 PROPOSED GRADE RESIDENTIAL REMOVED WITHIN THE BETTY LANE R/W M `' AND 5' INSIDE PROPERTY OCATION MAP h m n 0 N x N 3 d M 0 0 a 3 ro 0 0 0 N �r m u T: `3 u a_ 8 = O2 o o 3^ C W� Z a d � 3- S W-. `t Setbacks: Used. 0 feet (Downtown) Front 0 feet w �. AREA TO BE PAVED Setbacks: Proposed 145 spaces to be provided LLJ 25 feet Density Res.) Side 5 feet 10/19/07 Vehicular Use Arej_OYA 65,368 sf (45 %) OF ' s INTERIOR LANDSCAPE AREA A---- n 'ALA _.V !3 A ') n�\ LEGEND (D) DOWNTOWN X-� EXISTING GRADE °tk (MHDR) MEDIUM -HIGH DENSITY 33 PROPOSED GRADE RESIDENTIAL REMOVED WITHIN THE BETTY LANE R/W M `' AND 5' INSIDE PROPERTY OCATION MAP h m n 0 N x N 3 d M 0 0 a 3 ro 0 0 0 N �r m u T: `3 u a_ 8 = O2 o o 3^ C W� Z a d � 3- S W-. `t Setbacks: Front 0 feet (Downtown) Front 0 feet Front 0 feet Setbacks: Front 25 feet (Medium-High Front 25 feet Density Res.) Side 5 feet DESIGNED VT DRAWN CHEMED RP 1 \1 COMMENCING AT THE NORTH 1/4 CORNER OF SAID SECTION 15; THENCE RUN S89`18'56 °E ALONG THE NORTH BOUNDARY OF SAID SECTION 15, A DISTANCE OF 1,093.85 FEET; THENCE RUN S001553 °W, A DISTANCE OF 31.80 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF KELLET'S SUBDIVISION, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 11, PAGE 24, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA; THENCE RUN S89'05'28 °E, A DISTANCE OF 40.00 FEET, TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF F.A. KENNEDY'S FAIR LANE ADDITION, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 11, PAGE 16, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA, THENCE Proposed to Parking Proposed to Building RUN S0015'26 "W, A DISTANCE OF 310.10 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, THENCE RUN S89'22WE ALONG THE SOUTHERLY BOUNDARY OF LOT 6, BLOCK 6, REVISED PLAT OF BROOKWOOD TERRACE, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 8, PAGE 34, IN THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA, AND ITS WESTERLY EXTENSION, A DISTANCE OF 311.44 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT 6; THENCE RUN SOO'OO'19 °W ALONG THE EASTERLY BOUNDARY OF SAID BLOCK 3, REVISED PLAT OF BROOKWOOD TERRACE, A DISTANCE OF 200.10 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 10, SAID BLOCK 3, REVISED PLAT OF BROOKWOOD TERRACE; THENCE RUN N89'36'34AW ALONG THE SOUTHERLY BOUNDARY OF SAID LOT 10, A DISTANCE OF 111.00 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT 10; THENCE RUN S00'07'3eW ALONG THE WESTERLY BOUNDARIES OF LOTS 11 AND 12, SAID BLOCK 3, REVISED PLAT OF 0 feet (S) N/A BROOKWOOD TERRACE, A DISTANCE OF 100.00 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 13, SAID BLOCK 3, REVISED PLAT OF BROOKWOOD TERRACE; THENCE RUN S89.31'43aE ALONG THE NORTHERLY BOUNDARY OF SAID LOT 13, A DISTANCE OF 111.22 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT 13; THENCE 0 feet (E) N/A RUN S00.00'06 °E ALONG THE EASTERLY BOUNDARY OF SAID BLOCK 3, REVISED PLAT OF BROOKWOOD TERRACE, A DISTANCE OF 208.02 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID BLOCK 3, REVISED PLAT OF BROOKWOOD TERRACE, THENCE RUN N89 °43'18 °W ALONG THE SOUTHERLY BOUNDARY OF SAID BLOCK 3, 0 feet N/A REVISED PLAT OF BROOKWOOD TERRACE, A DISTANCE OF 111.63 FEET TO A POINT ON THE EASTERLY BOUNDARY OF A SUBDIVISION OF LOTS 16 AND 17 AND THE EAST 1/2 OF LOTS 5 AND 6 OF THE PADGETT ESTATE SUBDIVISION, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 6, PAGE 59, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA; THENCE RUN SOO°05'48 °W, A DISTANCE OF 10.00 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID A SUBDIVISION OF LOTS 16 AND 17 AND THE EAST 1/2 OF LOTS 5 AND 6 OF THE PADGETT ESTATE SUBDIVISION; THENCE RUN N8943'18"W, A DISTANCE OF 192.09 FEET TO A POINT THAT LIES 10 25 feet (E) N/A FEET EAST OF THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID A SUBDIVISION OF LOTS 16 AND 17 AND THE EAST 1/2 OF LOTS 5 AND 6 OF THE PADGETT ESTATE SUBDIVISION; THENCE RUN N0015'26 °E, ALONG A LINE 10 FEET EAST AND PARALLEL TO THE WESTERLY BOUNDARY OF SAID A SUBDIVISION OF LOTS 16 AND 17 AND THE EAST 1/2 OF LOTS 5 AND 6 OF THE PADGETT ESTATE SUBDIVISION, A DISTANCE OF 492.50, TO A POINT ON THE SOUTHERLY BOUNDARY OF LOT 8 OF SAID F.A. KENNEDY'S FAIR LANE ADDITION THAT LIES 10 FEET EAST OF THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT 8; THENCE RUN N8919'40 °W, ALONG THE 25 feet N/A SOUTHERLY BOUNDARY OF SAID LOT 8, FOR A DISTANCE OF 10.00 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT 8; THENCE RUN N0015'26'E, ALONG THE WEST BOUNDARY OF SAID LOT 8, A DISTANCE OF 27.61 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. 5 feet (N & S) N/A NOTE: CONTAINING 145,135 SQUARE FEET OR 3.33 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. 1. THE EXISTING STORM SEWER SYSTEM IS TO BE CLEANED OUT 2. ALL UTILITIES WILL BE PLACED UNDERGROUND PREPARED FOR: gNFF.T nF- gCRTPTTC)N• THESE PLANS MAY NOT BE COPIED OR GULF COAST CONSULTING, INC. NO. DATE REVISIONS CMMCATE OF AUTHORIZATION Na 9774 ' /�rrrtt�t��r JOB NO. 07 °053 SIT- DATE: APPD 10/19/07 BY OF it 00"A -®- PALM TREE E50TA NICAL NAME — 111 N TREE RATIN& — OAK TREE 00-M — GAMPHOR TREE oo,,,L — Au5TRALjAN PINE Tp=E 00"0 — PINE TREE OOU — PUNK TREE 00-ED MI TREE 00"(j) — MAGNOLIA TREE 001-& — CEDAR TREE 00" — EVERC-REEN TREE EX15TINO TREE TO REMAIN 1511 A ra TA 6 # GOMMONNAME E50TA NICAL NAME Daff RATIN& REPLACEMENT STATU5 I HA51-IIN67TON PALM Hashingtonla Robusta 12 5 0 5 2 HA5HIN5TON PALM Hashingtonla Robusta 111 13 0 5 3 IN TON PALM— Hashingtonla RoWrta 12 3 0 5 4 K-N51-11NOTON PALM HmhIngtonla Robu5ta 12 5 1 R 5 ITALIANGYPI;ZE5!5 6u,pre5su5!5empqrvIren9 5 2 R 6 NA5HINOTON PALM Hashingtonla, Robusty Il 5 0 5 1"7 HA51-11NOTON PALM Hashingtonla Robusta 11 5 0 5 HA5HINC-7TON PALM Harhingtonla Robuqta I1 5 0 5 ORIENTAL ARBOR-VITAE Thu ja orlentalt!5 8' 2 2 R 110 E30TTLE BRU51-1 GaIll9teman rIgIclur, 5, 5 2 BOTTLE BRU51-1 Callisteman r1cliclus -7 5 --2 GA- E515AC-E PALM sabal Palmetto 12 3 0 ,15 LIVE OAK 6bjerc-u5 virginlana' '._ 10 5 10 R PUNK TREE maialevca gulngveneryla 0 15 LAUREL OAK Gvercus laurifolla 45 4 0 1h PUNK TREE Malaleuca vufnqvenervla 15 l 0 1 1 '7 LAURAL OAK Quercvs laurifolla 25, 2cl 2 0 R la YELLON-POINCIANA Peltophorum Inerme I ro 3 2 R jq PUNK TREE Malaleura gyInguenervi-a 12 1 0 R 20 LIVE- OAK Guerrus virginlana R 21 GABBAeE PALM 5a Palmetto l# 1 R 22 LAtRF-L OAK Guercv-s laurifolla 14 - 4 0 5 23 GVEEN PALM Arer-ortrum romanzofflanum q 5 0 5 24 LAUREL OAK Guercus laurifolla-, - 4 0 5 25 LAUREL OAK Guercus laurifolla q 3 Cl R 265 LAUREL OAK Guercus laur-Ifolla 15 3 13 R 21 GABBAOE PALM 50bal Palmetto 15 1 0 R 25 LAUREL OAK Gvercur, laurifolla 12 3 12 R 2cl, LAUREL OAK GuerLus laurtfolla 16 2 0 R 30 LAUREL OAK Gueraus laurifolla 42 1 0 R 31 LAUREL OAK Gvercu5 lourfolla 1(0 4 16 R. 52 GAE35A 6E PALM 50bal Palmetto 15 5 1 35 G 67E PALM 50bal Palmetto 16 3 I R 54 CAE313AC-E PALM 50bal Palmetto 14 5 R TOTALINCHF-5 4q5 54" TREE EVALUATION fq=-RFOR-I`-� BY: E-LENA NEAL - CERTWIED AfMORIST * FL Sba2l DESIGNED ANERSH LES141AK LIMITED, INC. JF DRAWN landscape architects land planners JF 4921 S. WESTSHORE BOULEVARD TAMPA, FLORIDA 33611 CHECKED AU (813) 831-9595 FAX 831-5485 anderson.lesniak@verizon.net www.andersonlesniak.nel Q.C. AU' OWN, 0 > ME! bf f JOB NO- E 20 20. 20' 20 r- 1 2J' >0' 20' 10 A, V 1/// F7-�;—x JnN]AV VONMNJI Fa F i S 7 —9 G 0 S BETTY LANE 1280 Cleveland Street Clearwater, Florida 6 NOW on ` • • Q�t 0- M 0 0 0 Nil (3 R I i j I it W�91 N I I 1 9 JF JOB NO- 07217 �-B&PG DATE- AP?D '1/0/07 1 __A_ 'OF Z' F, j- F; -1 ! J DFSTGNM ANDERSON LESMAKLIMITED, INC. JF DRAWN land planners landscape architects JF 4921 S. WESTSHORE BOULEVARD TAMPA, FLORIDA 33611 CHECKED (813) 831-9595 FAX 831-5485 4 AU Q.C. anderson.lesnlak(�Pverlzonmet www.andersonlesniak.net AU O - "Wila-AW 4 APE 5""(MBOL LEOEND AR TI BAHIA 50D 6VANT11Y 10 0 .................. .............. .......... GV 5FEGIE5 5,000 50 PT\ g 0 0 00 0 0 0,900 0- ce 0 0 0 6 O� 0 O 0 0. 0 :0 IT- 2X 5HRUB FLANTINC-7 DETAIL VERIZON I 280 Cleveland Street Clearwater,, Florida m m REGUIRED 2 AGCENT OR 5 PALM PER 40 L.F. AND I 5HRUS PER 20 5.f=. cl30 L.F. /40 = 25 X 2 = 46 AGGENT TREE5 OR 6cl PALMS X130 L.F. / 20 41 5 f:)Rovm>ED,: 14 ACCENT TREE-5 + 24 PALMS = 5& FOUNDATION TREE5 AND 211 5HRU55 0 3nN3AV Voldam NOTE: -!A N 4' HIGH 5OLIP FVG 2C VINAL— FNr.F 5±JALL_BF 7 7 7 7 REOUGED TO 31 HEIGHT N ------ - ------ FHIN THE FRONT ............ ------------- .... .. ..................... 5ETE3AGK ALONG N A\ -1\ . ..... FEDRICA AVENUE. ... .......... &5 NOTE: X 02, n. HAX MYRTLE T 0:: R 23 u ....... Y 5HALL ATTAIN A sir. . .................... HEI6HT OF HITHINO THREE ..... YEARS /25 ----------- ......... ...... --N .... ..... .... .. D- ....... 35 RI .... ..... .. ... ........ ..... F5 D- ................ .......... MG J 20 \r5V !j mml� RN 7 43T m- I/ ro \1 QV TY 0 20' N 3Tj $2 azf Oz 0I aro, -1 kl--41 b4 EGUIPMENT 5Ef;ZVICE AREA BETTY LANE M Z 011 Ili JF 07297 FA & M. OF SPACINO Sym OTY BOTANICAL NAME WWON NAME SPECIFICATIONS 30 0 30 60 OV 30 GUERCU5 VIRC;-,INIANA LIVE OAK 1O' HT X 5'SM, 25" CAL, RFC A6 5HOWN RM q RAVENALA MADAeA5GARIEN515 TRAVELER5 PALM 14' I-OC-MT OVERALL AS SHOWN GM 14 CARYOTA MITI5 F15HTAIL PALM 12' OVERALL HEIGHT, DOUBLE AS 5HOWN LA 27 LAC-5ER5TROEMIA MICA CRAPE MYRTLE 5TAWAR-0 £1' HT X ro"SPD, 2" CAL, 30 GALLON A5 5HOWN VO 13 VIBURNUM OBOVATUM NALTERS VIBURNUM TREE 6- HT X 6- 51:10, 30 GALLON 101 CE 25 ILEX VOMIT IA PENDULA kEEPIN99 'rAUPON HOLLY 10- HT X 4'!5FV, 50 GALLON A5 SHOWN 5HRU135 MY 4 e� MYi;ZERFERA irA C I kiAX PfrRXE 45"-HT X 3b" 5FD, 15 &ALLON 48" 205 VIBURNUM OBOVATUM COMPACT HALTER5 VIBURMN I&- HT X la' 5PD, 3 GALLON 36" P5 121 PHILODENDRON 5ELLOUM PHILODEWRON 24" HT X 24" 5PD, 3 GALLON 56il 5A 2qi 5rHEFFLERA AR5ORICOLA 5CHEFFLERA 7-RINET7-E 'a" HT X I&" 5PD, 5 GALLON 63ROUND GOVER MG 455 MUHLENBERC-AA GAPILLAR15 MUHLr 6RA55 12" HT X 12",5PP, 1 C7ALLON 24" DV 525 DIETE5 VEC-;ETA kIH17E AFRICAN IR15 10" HT X 10" 5PD, I GALLON 24" RI 555 APHID 15 INDIOA DkIARF INDIAN NAkITHORN lO-'HT X 10" SM, I &ALLON 2411 Tf= 1570 TRIP5AOUIM FLORIDA NA DkIARF FAKAHATCHEE 04zk5_5 �12" HT X 12- SPD, I GALLON 2411 j- F; -1 ! J DFSTGNM ANDERSON LESMAKLIMITED, INC. JF DRAWN land planners landscape architects JF 4921 S. WESTSHORE BOULEVARD TAMPA, FLORIDA 33611 CHECKED (813) 831-9595 FAX 831-5485 4 AU Q.C. anderson.lesnlak(�Pverlzonmet www.andersonlesniak.net AU O - "Wila-AW 4 APE 5""(MBOL LEOEND AR TI BAHIA 50D 6VANT11Y 10 0 .................. .............. .......... GV 5FEGIE5 5,000 50 PT\ g 0 0 00 0 0 0,900 0- ce 0 0 0 6 O� 0 O 0 0. 0 :0 IT- 2X 5HRUB FLANTINC-7 DETAIL VERIZON I 280 Cleveland Street Clearwater,, Florida m m REGUIRED 2 AGCENT OR 5 PALM PER 40 L.F. AND I 5HRUS PER 20 5.f=. cl30 L.F. /40 = 25 X 2 = 46 AGGENT TREE5 OR 6cl PALMS X130 L.F. / 20 41 5 f:)Rovm>ED,: 14 ACCENT TREE-5 + 24 PALMS = 5& FOUNDATION TREE5 AND 211 5HRU55 0 3nN3AV Voldam NOTE: -!A N 4' HIGH 5OLIP FVG 2C VINAL— FNr.F 5±JALL_BF 7 7 7 7 REOUGED TO 31 HEIGHT N ------ - ------ FHIN THE FRONT ............ ------------- .... .. ..................... 5ETE3AGK ALONG N A\ -1\ . ..... FEDRICA AVENUE. ... .......... &5 NOTE: X 02, n. HAX MYRTLE T 0:: R 23 u ....... Y 5HALL ATTAIN A sir. . .................... HEI6HT OF HITHINO THREE ..... YEARS /25 ----------- ......... ...... --N .... ..... .... .. D- ....... 35 RI .... ..... .. ... ........ ..... F5 D- ................ .......... MG J 20 \r5V !j mml� RN 7 43T m- I/ ro \1 QV TY 0 20' N 3Tj $2 azf Oz 0I aro, -1 kl--41 b4 EGUIPMENT 5Ef;ZVICE AREA BETTY LANE M Z 011 Ili JF 07297 FA & M. OF A' B—] z 30 0 30 60 j- F; -1 ! J DFSTGNM ANDERSON LESMAKLIMITED, INC. JF DRAWN land planners landscape architects JF 4921 S. WESTSHORE BOULEVARD TAMPA, FLORIDA 33611 CHECKED (813) 831-9595 FAX 831-5485 4 AU Q.C. anderson.lesnlak(�Pverlzonmet www.andersonlesniak.net AU O - "Wila-AW 4 APE 5""(MBOL LEOEND AR TI BAHIA 50D 6VANT11Y 10 0 .................. .............. .......... GV 5FEGIE5 5,000 50 PT\ g 0 0 00 0 0 0,900 0- ce 0 0 0 6 O� 0 O 0 0. 0 :0 IT- 2X 5HRUB FLANTINC-7 DETAIL VERIZON I 280 Cleveland Street Clearwater,, Florida m m REGUIRED 2 AGCENT OR 5 PALM PER 40 L.F. AND I 5HRUS PER 20 5.f=. cl30 L.F. /40 = 25 X 2 = 46 AGGENT TREE5 OR 6cl PALMS X130 L.F. / 20 41 5 f:)Rovm>ED,: 14 ACCENT TREE-5 + 24 PALMS = 5& FOUNDATION TREE5 AND 211 5HRU55 0 3nN3AV Voldam NOTE: -!A N 4' HIGH 5OLIP FVG 2C VINAL— FNr.F 5±JALL_BF 7 7 7 7 REOUGED TO 31 HEIGHT N ------ - ------ FHIN THE FRONT ............ ------------- .... .. ..................... 5ETE3AGK ALONG N A\ -1\ . ..... FEDRICA AVENUE. ... .......... &5 NOTE: X 02, n. HAX MYRTLE T 0:: R 23 u ....... Y 5HALL ATTAIN A sir. . .................... HEI6HT OF HITHINO THREE ..... YEARS /25 ----------- ......... ...... --N .... ..... .... .. D- ....... 35 RI .... ..... .. ... ........ ..... F5 D- ................ .......... MG J 20 \r5V !j mml� RN 7 43T m- I/ ro \1 QV TY 0 20' N 3Tj $2 azf Oz 0I aro, -1 kl--41 b4 EGUIPMENT 5Ef;ZVICE AREA BETTY LANE M Z 011 Ili JF 07297 FA & M. OF A' B—] If !! W7 11 ON WEN "40 ZEN 5YMBOL GUANTITY MODEL NUMBER A 0 p, MPR4O-Ob--rV-MP2O003bO, W POP-UP ROTATOR a 0 65 HPR4O-0&--_GV-MP2OOI ro" POP-UP ROTATOR G 0 4 MPR4O�4&-rV-MPC.4 RNERc14, Co- POP-UP ROTATOR D o 1 MPR4O-O&-C,\/-MP2OOO2IO, III POP-UP ROTATOR E 0 11 MPR4O0b--6V-MP5553O,5IVE STRIP 5 X 30., 6® POP-UP ROTATOR F 0 5 MPR4O0b-GV-MPRG55l5, RIC-MT BV STRIP 5 X 15, b- POP4JP ROTATOR 0 2-1 PCN-10, 1.00 OPM PRE55UREC4MPEN5ATIN6 BU55LER 0 -15 HPICTIll PRE55URE GOMPITIN& EMMITER 2,&(T7 L.F. TLOVcl-1200, TECHL]INE 0\/ DRIP 7UBINe (D 4 Ir_.V 1516-F-5-A!5, HUNTER 15" IGV FILTER VALVE 4 DF1505-120,1.5- D15G FILTER 120 ME5H, RED 2 lov - 1510, IS" ELECTRIC VALVE I,?_OO_L.F. 2" PI 5G LE 40, MAIN LINE I PC - 600 PL, 65TATION04NTROLLER I HRO: HIRELE-55 RAIN 5EN50R 0011111111130 1 2" f3RONZE 5ATE VALVE f3ACKFLOW PREVENTOR A5 RE61UIREr? BY LOCAL ACSENGY ,I –1 I �� I'll I IIII _"N I III I DESIGNED F PRAWN JF CHECKED AtJ Q.C. AU ANDERSON LESNIAK LIMITED, INC. landscape architects land pfarmers 4921- S. WESTSHORE BOULEVARD TAMPA, FLORIDA 33611 (813) 831-9595 FAX 831-5485 anderson.lesniek Ccoverizon.net www.andersonlesniak.net 1 151! 11 • "I V 1 K;Qd, NO MI 1 1 m i - FIN15H C—RADE L 1. MA31 TO HEADS .0 00c) 00 D 0-00 00 1-10 0 00 J t Am 11 CONTROLLER HALL 120 VOLT HIRE CONTROL II IN CONDUIT COMMON H PE 4 ' FLEX CONDUIT -------- 7 FLOOR FvI j- AN10 VM01WI 2 war 3 - - K,7 0, L 12-21-07 CHANGES PER CITY COMMENTS 2-11-08 CHANGES- PER CITY COMMENTS 2-11-08 CHANGES PER CITY COMMENTS DATE fL Reg., 1163 NO. 7 ------ --- REVISION'S 1t� i'/ `i' •1` 111 .. ,, 1 .`1+ i t tt � ! !t !, -, - !' �� �� � �t, !,° � � •�,� +,� - a• �. � .r,� . � - -•ic �� 1, �, -', ��, � 1 i � i� i 'i ,' 1 i i i' �` 1 1 • 1 i! i � r 1 1 1 1► 1 '•1 � .1 /: � • 11 . i 1 1 `•'• 1 i i 1.� i r t r i' i i � 'r ,,1 , i i 1 i '•1 � 1 1`, 1 � .. r .i .i # i �` ! 1•' i i i i �i .!1 i � i� , # i i• �. i r r r>' M.. ,_r. i i T 1i 1, i { i i i' 1 .. i t li r� i � i' i r i; � ti' �' • 1 :i ' 1.' i 1 i 1 1 + q i 'i i LINE DATA UNE LABEL BEARING DISTANCE L1 S00'05'48 "W 10.00'RM L2 N891953 "W 10.00'RM L3 N0015'24 "E 27.61'M e uncwno n. im- , +rnvrw�vi;rus -m scxun -a, mpwr -Ln iiu. <uiui __ ♦ a . y/A/ ygry 78/ 54p0 . y . /G! J 700. .. lGdS. .: LB 1834. .. [N�.TI/4 ER 6F SEION 15- LOCATION `r' 11"aQe ��llVW�1J ll P tf'Q�� I u v r o o. e AL DESCRIPTION a•. r•, •r r r / a a r r r a' • r/ ? w 44 4. nui DUR LwnoLU LAVE-17 " JHVMI 1,LI,Lw,. UNLESS OTHERWISE STATED, THIS SURVEY WAS PREPARED WITHOUT THE BENEFIT OF A TITLE SEARCH AND MAY BE A PORTION OF LOTS 7 THROUGH 10 AND LOTS 13 THROUGH 18, F.A. KENNEDYS FAIR LANE ADDITION, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 11, PAGE 6, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA. THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY APPEARS TO BE IN ZONE X, IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE FIRM MAP OF THE CITY OF WATER, COMMUNITY PANEL 125096, MAP NUMBER 12103C- 0108 —H, MAP REVISED MAY 17, 2005. 5. SUBJECT TO ADDITIONAL EASEMENTS, RIGHT -OF -WAYS, AND OTHER MATTERS OF RECORD. THERE ARE NO VISIBLE ENCROACHMENTS, EXCEPT AS SHOWN HEREON. 6. BECAUSE OF THE POSSIBILITY OF MOVEMENT OF THE MONUMENTATION FROM ITS ORIGINAL PLACEMENT BY PERSONS TOGETHER WITH: PREPARED FOR ! ' OTHER THAN THE SURVEYOR, IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT PRIOR TO ANY NEW IMPROVEMENTS ON THE PROPERTY -- THE POSITION OF THE MONUMENTATION BE VERIFIED. A POR11ON OF LOTS 1 THROUGH 10, A SUBDIVISON OF LOTS 16 AND 17 AND THE EAST 1/2 OF LOTS 5 AND 6 OF THE PADGETT ESTATE SUBDIVISION, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 6, PAGE 59, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA VERIZON FLORIDA LLC ' 7. UNAUTHORIZED COPIES AND /OR REPRODUCTIONS VIA ANY MEDIUM OF THIS DOCUMENT OR ANY PORTIONS THEREOF ARE EXPRESSLY PROHIBITED WITHOUT THE SIGNING SURVEYOR'S W4RITTEN CONSENT. 8. MEASURED BEARINGS ARE IN REFERENCE TO FLORIDA STATE PLANE COORDINATE GRID NORTH, WEST ZONE, NORTH TOGETHER WITH: AMERICAN DATUM OF 1983 (1994 READJUSTMENI)I, AS ESTABLISHED BY THE NATIONAL GEODETIC SURVEY. I 9. ALL BUILDING TIES, PROPERTY MARKER LOCATIONS AND OTHER SITE IMPROVEMENT LOCATIONS SHOWN HEREON ARE A PORTION OF LOTS 8 AND 9, F.A. KENNEDYS FAIR E ADDITION, AS RECORDED IN PLAT B 11, PACE 16, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA 10. MEASURED PERPENDICULAR to ADJACENT BOUNDARY LINES, UNLESS OTHERWISE HAVE FLOOD ZONE DESIGNATION AND/OR FLOOD ZONE LINES (IF ANY) SHOWN HEREON HAVE . BEEN SCALED FROM THE REFERENCED MAP AND ARE APPROXIMATE. THE TRUE FLOOD ZONE LINES MUST BE DETERMINED BY AN ENGINEER. BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: 11. 12. THIS SURVEY DOES NOT DETERMINE OR IMPLY OWNERSHIP. THERE MAY BE ADDITIONAL RESTRICTIONS, EASEMENTS OR OTHER MATTERS OF RECORD THAT ARE NOT SHOWN COMMENCING AT THE NORTH 1/4 CORNER OF SAID SECTION 15; THENCE RUN S8918'56 -E ALONG THE NORTH BOUNDARY OF SAID SECTION 15, A DISTANCE OF 1,093.85 FEET; THENCE RUN S0015531, A DISTANCE OF 31.80 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST 13. HEREON THAT MAY BE FOUND IN THE PUBLIC RECORDS of THIS COUNTY. SUBSURFACE UTILITY LOCATIONS SHOWN HEREON ARE BASED ON UTILITY DELINEATION PROVIDED BY GEOMASTERS, INC. CORNER OF KELLIETS SUBDIVISION, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 11, PAGE 24, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINEUS COUNTY, FLORIDA; THENCE RUN S89'05'28'E, A DISTANCE OF 40.00 FEET, TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF F.A. KENNEDYS FAIR LANE AND ARE LIMITED TO THE SOUTH RIGHT -OF-WAY OF DREW STREET, AND THE EAST RIGHT —OF —WAY OF BETTY LANE ADDITION, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 11 PAGE 16 OF THE PUBt1C RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA, THENCE RUN S0015'26" W, A DISTANCE OF 310.10 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE RUN S89.22WE ALONG THE SOUTHERLY 14. ADJACENT To F.A. KENNEDYS SUBDIVISION ELEVATIONS SHOWN HEREON ARE BASED ON THE NATIONAL GEODETIC SURVEYS BENCHMARK BREEZE W, AT WHICH THE BOUNDARY OF LOT 6, BL 6, REVISED PLAT OF BR TERRACE, AS RECORDED IN PLAT B 8, PAGE 34, IN THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA, AND ITS WESTERLY EXTENSION, A DISTANCE OF 311.44 T TO THE ELEVATION Is REPORTED As 43,93 FEET N.Ava.as SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT 6; THENCE RUN SOO'00'19"W ALONG THE EASTERLY BOUNDARY OF SAID BLOCK 3, REVISED PLAT OF BROOKWOOD TERRACE, A DISTANCE OF 200.10 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 10, SAID BLOCK 3, REVISED °W { PLAT OF BROOKWOOD TERRA CE, • THENCE RUN N8936'34"W ALONG THE SOUTHERLY BOUNDARY OF SAID LOT 10, A DISTANCE OF 111.00 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT 10; THENCE RUN SOO'07'34 ALONG THE WESTERLY BOUNDARIES f OF LOTS 11 AND 12, SAID BLOCK 3, REVISED PLAT OF BROOKWOOD TERRACE, A DISTANCE OF 100.00 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 13, SAID BLOCK 3, REVISED PLAT OF BROOKWOOD TERRACE; THENCE RUN S8931 -43 "E ALONG THE REVISION: ADDED TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION ON 10/17/2007 (070172A- 1.DWG) REVISED WEST BOUNDARY FOR RIGHT —OF —WAY EASEMENT ON 12 13 2007 070172A -2.DWG NORTHERLY BOUNDARY OF SAID LOT 13, A DISTANCE OF 111.22 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT 13; THENCE RUN SOO'00 O6-E ALONG THE EASTERLY BOUNDARY OF SAID BLOCK 3, REVISED PLAT OF BROOKY TERRACE, A DISTANCE OF ", <T 0�°&fY'KNOWLED( aNO BELIEF JOB NUMBER: 070172' DATE SURVEYED: 07 19 2007 208.02 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID BL 3 REVISED PLAT OF BR TERRACE; THENCE RUN N89.43'18*W ALONG THE SOUTHERLY BOUNDARY OF SAID BLOCK 3, REVISED PLAT OF BROOK WOOD TERRACE, A DISTANCE OF 111.63 cERnFlc nm I HEREBY cER IRI�ij THAT THE SURVEY SHOWN H suesTAN>abuYL TRULE DRAWING FILE Q70172 DWG DATE DRAWN: 08 Q2 2007 T TO A POINT ON THE EASTERLY BOUNDARY OF A SUBDIVISION OF LOTS 16 AND 17 AND THE EAST 1/2 OF LOTS 5 AND 6 OF THE PADGETT ESTATE SUBDIVISION, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 6, PAGE 59, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINE S 1 .4 FLORIDA °su vEYING. - Ttl€��T TES FLORI RULE stc17. a•. r•, •r r r / a a r r r a' • r/ ? w 44 GEORGE # 1.... 1 r r• al r . .. � .. 1 `fib /•�! `+ "`' H rr 1 1 h 1i it 1' i * vil . r vt P I'll •t `iY v - r• 1 •'i "�� % ! I • • ' }, UND SURVErYORS LAND, PLANNERS t 1. u u u 0 20 40 60 GRAPHIC SCALE 9 vn� ucawzor orviv A PORTION OF LOTS 7 THROUGH 10 AND LOTS 13 THROUGH 18, F.A. KENNEDY'S FAIR LANE ADDITION, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 11, PAGE 6, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA. TOGETHER WITH: A PORTION OF LOTS 1 THROUGH 10, A SUBDIVISON OF LOTS 16 AND 17 AND THE EAST 1/2 OF LOTS 5 AND 6 OF THE PADGETT ESTATE SUBDIVISION, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 6, PAGE 59, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA. TOGETHER VATH: A PORTION OF LOTS 8 AND 9, F.A. KENNEDY'S FAIR LANE ADDITION, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 11, PAGE 16, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: rE 1 OF CONTAINING 145,135 SQUARE OR ACRES, MORE OR I-Eli ZON 3. cA"r, „a anvmv nLnrur. INACCESSIBLE ABOVE (MOUND IMPROVEMENTS (E.G. BUILDING OVERHANGS, THOSE WITHIN SECURED AREAS, ETC.), HAVE DISTANCE L1 S00'05'48 °W NOT BEEN LOCATED EXCEPT AS SHOWN HEREON. L2 THE 0 DESCRIBED PROPERTY APPEARS TO BE IN ZONE X, IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE FIRM MAP OF THE CITY OF 4. UNLESS OTHERWISE STATED, THIS SURVEY WAS PREPARED WITHOUT THE BENEFIT OF A TITLE LARCH AND MAY BE N0015WE WA , COMMUNITY PANEL 125096, MAP NUMBER 12103C- 0108 —H, MAP REVISED MAY 17, 2005. SUBJECT TO ADDITIONAL EASEMENTS, RIGHT—OF—WAYS, AND OTHER MATTERS of RECORD. 5. THERE ARE NO VISIBLE ENCROACHMENTS, EXCEPT AS SHOWN HEREON. PREPARED FOR 1 6. BECAUSE OF THE POSSIBILITY OF MOVEMENT OF THE MONUMENTATION FROM ITS ORIGINAL PLACEMENT BY PERSONS ! OTHER THAN THE SURVEYOR, IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT PRIOR TO ANY NEW IMPROVEMENTS ON THE PROPERTY THE POSITION OF THE MONUMENTATION BE VERIFIED. IZ FL IDA LLC 7. UNAUTHORIZED COPIES AND /OR REPRODUCTIONS VIA ANY MEDIUM OF THIS DOCUMENT OR ANY PORTIONS THERE ARE EXPRESSLY PROHIBITED WITHOUT THE SIGNING SURVEYOR'S WRITTEN CONSENT. G 11. MEASURED BEARINGS ARE IN REFERENCE TO FLORIDA STATE PLANE COORDINATE GRID NORTH, WEST ZONE, NORTH AMERICAN DATUM OF 19113 (1990 READJUSTMENT), AS ESTABLISHED BY THE NATIONAL GEODETIC SURVEY. 9. ALL BUILDING TIES, PROPERTY MARKER LOCATIONS AND OTHER SITE IMPROVEMENT LOCATIONS SHOWN HEREON ARE MEASURED PERPENDICULAR TO ADJACENT BOUNDARY LINES, UNLESS OTHERWISE STATED. 10. FLOOD ZONE DESIGNATION AND /OR FLOOD ZONE LINES (IF ANY) SHOWN HEREON NAVE BEEN SCALED FROM THE REFERENCED MAP AND ARE APPROXIMATE. THE TRUE FLOOD ZONE LINES MUST BE DETERMINED BY AN ENGINEER. 11. THIS SURVEY DOES NOT DETERMINE OR IMPLY OWNERSHIP. 12. THERE MAY BE ADDITIONAL RESTRICTIONS, EASEMENTS OR OTHER MATTERS OF RECORD THAT ARE NOT SHOWN HEREON THAT MAY BE FOUND IN THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF THIS COUNTY 11 SUBSURFACE UTILITY LOCATIONS SHOWN HEREON ARE BASED ON UTILITY DELINEATION PROVIDED BY GEOMASTERS, INC. AND ARE LIMITED To THE SOUTH RIGHT —OF —WAY OF DREW STREET, AND THE EAST RIGHT —OF—WAY OF BETTY LANE ADJACENT TO F.A. KENNEDYS SUBDIVISION 14. ELEVATIONS SHOWN HEREON ARE BASED ON THE NATIONAL GEODETIC SURVEYS BENCHMARK 'BREEZE W,' AT WHICH THE ELEVATION IS REPORTED AS 43.93 FEET N.A.V.D.88 a BOUNDARY otmu'RIVEY REVISION: ADDED TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION ON 10/17/2007 (070172A- 1.DWG) REVISED WEST BOUNDARY FOR RIGHT —OF —WAY EASEMENT ON 12 13 2007 070172A -2.DWG CERTIFICATION: I HEREBY CERTIFY TQ,THE,BEST'OFiMYsKNOW1JEDGE AND BELIEF JOB NUMBER: 070172 DATE SURVEYED: 07 19 2007 . THAT THE SURVEY SHOWN HEREONIIS 1BSfA,N�Aj1Y, 6Ei 'THE MINIMUM TECHNICAL DRAWING FILE: 070172.DWG DATE DRAWN: 08 02 2007 LINE DATA LINE LABEL BEARING DISTANCE L1 S00'05'48 °W 10.00'RM L2 N8919'53"W 10.00'RM L3 N0015WE 27.61'M gal 1 ` r •.;;u 1' 1'� 1 ` �� �a r• 1 ' �' ���� / i1 J ' ' 1 ' / 'Jim I - , Ocr,& — PALM TREE 00'0 — WILLOW TREE 00'0 — OAK TREE 0013 — CAMPHOR TREE WA — AUSTRALIAN PINE TREE 00'0 — PINE TREE mu — PUNK TREE o0m — MIMOSA TREE Oft — MAGNOLIA TREE W,& — CEDAR TREE oft — EVERGREEN TREE -91 (D — VERIZON MANHOLE 0 — POWER POLE — OVERHEAD WIRES — LIGHT POLE I!] — ROAD SIGN lil — METER POLE — TOP OF BANK — GUY WIRE @ — DRAINAGE MANHOLE — WATER VALVE — GATE VALVE 13 — BOLLARD 0 — WATER METER re) — rl 17ANN IT ------------- 2" x C, r--x — — — — — — — — — — - - - -- — — — @ — — — — — — — — — W. BNDY. Of .9 --WATCH, UN ----------------------------------------- ------------- _4 —,/LOT 12 HATCH UME -------------------- ------ -------- r. -"m Lr%-,LMLJII "I If./w/1vul kvlul/Lm-"m) CERTIn .�TION: I HEREBY CERM�.' -TO ' �THE!BESJ_ MY KNOWLEDM AND BELIEF JOB NUMBER: 070172 DATE SURVEYED: D: OZ19 L2007 H IN a THAT'TH SURVEY SHOIA , § TIALL AUPS THE MINIMUM TECHNICAL , 00" - STANDARDS FOR LAND .80'RgTA,,pESaWlNTH �efAJE, OF FLORIDA RULE 61(317, DRAWING FILE: 070172.DWG DATE DRAWN: 08LO2L2007 ORE VTHIS in F.A.C. FURWA TIMATICNJ�Ml-N Pft TO ANY OTHER Paws LAST. REVISION: 12L1312007 X REFERENCE: N THO' ' . I., OR PARTIES OTHEWTHAN SE � AMEDON,,M$ Pkft AND SHALL NOT BE VALID AND BINDING �01`�T THEUNDERSIGNED SVRVD%VfTHOtJT THE ORIGINAL .0 GEORGE A. SHWH RAISED SK AND:SIGNATI THE FL6lRlDN PCENSEP SURVEYOR AND MAPPER, N AND ASSOMITS, MORPOMMO /7 w LAND SURVEYORS LAND PLANNERS GEORGE lk SHI", 11 IDA k6SiEREQ6L"AND %RVEYOR No. 2512 890/ POSOTO 801ILff", Sb)7f B GREGORY A. 'SHIMP, - P ANAL SQRVEY(A di MAPPER No. 6161 P" ffILWOR, FLORIDA 8488 PffOff (7) 784F LB 1834 72 -US6 Fff (727) 786-1256 r ®f SE C TION 151 RNG, 15 E., PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORID.?] n I SIGNAL PM _ Gli 4U bu '� LANE ADDITION THROAT EL = "2.4.88 / THROAT EL- 26.33 1_ co � `�,�• � ti WTDt METAL � s E I 0.50' ^p• oti 1 G CUTS f b > t ° , c• � . �• e� SUPPORT Auras e , > 4s: � t, t� 3 d l 1• i 1 ? /� � 4� �, yo r,. n �o .� s¢p r ;� 1° k�s GRAPHIC SCALE TELEPHONE "" : ; • x �' . .... � � •�. 1 inch = 20 ft. N.E. CORNER (VAULT �'�� n� ���' �` �o I OF KELLEf S SUBDIVISION `r' I �, : " : : :. : , ,. - - - - - - - - - do _ _ N.E. CORNER OF BLOCK 3, , t n , 1 - do �ti S89 05 28 E 40.00 M ?� _ ; ..` : r~ .. LEGAL DESCRIPTION 1 - -____ -1 -- -------- - - - - -- °-- °------- - - - - -° ?��� __ - -- REVISED PLAT OF BROOKWOOD TERRACE 5/8 FlR ' _ t j - _ ®5892109 E® -- =- ti� -- -- 3i0,07M, 31a'R caNC. -- �SS4DD ( ) . 4'X4' FCM - _ 4o.aa R C 1 2512 �'� i 50 R 50'R 50'R . .-•... .. �s� = == - 5o'R 9° .. .,. '. --- -- -- ----- ---- -- .. A PORTION OF LOTS 1 THROUGH 6, REVISED PLAT OF BRQOKWOOD TERRACE, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 8, I N. BNDY. OF SS4� 55'R 55'R FND. DRILL P.O.B. : 0.281S. S89'0 'Q3 °E 59.86'M; 60'R PAGE 34, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA. ' ttt'0 I �, a,. F.A. KENNEDYS FAIR 0.36'S. p T LANE ADDITION P' r �> �� , l ? ?�> T��,� 12° vti 1s' �DEWALK t Tc �r `' ?'� ti 1 ?a'a TOGETHER WITH: t I .�? x �,, ?� N. BNDY. OF BLOCK 3, 0.55 S. �o Q . CURB INLET t 27• I, s REVISED PLAT OF BROOKW }� �. Et - 24.08 � TERRACE I ry � ITCIP 20.00 T ` Y THROAT Et= 23.18 I , : •- 4' � , � , TELEPHONE �. ,�. A PORTION OF LOTS 1 THOUGH 8, F.A. KENNEDYS FAIR LANE ADDITION, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 11 x 3 r VAULT y`�' ' ti PAGE 16, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA. s t4' 240 I �° �o t ' ..I. •, � I BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: x :.l. I (ASPHALT) 29.60: ' j oti �4 J. , 20 x COMMENCING AT THE NORTH 1 4 CORNER OF SECTION 15 TOWNSHIP 29 SOUTH RANGE 15 I - � EAST, THENCE f 1- '� , I I •I s RUN S89i856 E ALONG THE N E QR>N BOUNDARY OF SAID SECTION 15 A DISTANCE 'z, �s ?. •T ! ` �h - � NGE OF 1,093.85 FEET, THENCE RUN S00i553 W, A DISTANCE OF 31.80 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST S CORNER OF KELLEY'S SUBDIVISION, AS x I Q RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 11, PAGE 24, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY FLORIDA THENCE I 1 , S , - , � � RUN S89'05 28 E, A DISTANCE 4F 40.00 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER X - I OF F.A. KENNEDY' I ON -SITE TBM ,� - S FAIR LANE l..l 1% 1 ADDITION AS RECORDED SET NdcT yo 1 MANOR , N PLAT BOOK 11, PAGE 16, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, EL= 29.40 NAVU88 0 0 6 y �c , a .- � .- � �.ti FLORIDA, SAID POINT ALSO BEING THE POINT OF BEGINNING; ti THENCE RUN S89'2109 E ALONG THE NORTH ,. � I I APARTMENT'S L ; lYI o I BOUNDARIES OF SAID F.A. KENNEDYS FAIR LANE ADDITION AND REVISED PLAT OF BROOKWQQD . •! " 1 I �, .� 0;' � � M. � � � TERRACE, AS � x. °1 , p RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 8 PAGE 34 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY DISTANCE �, �' ;� 3t , 1• o � �'' C�Q ° ©r� , , FLORIDA, , ANCE OF o1 X �,. x x ,_ ti 3i0A7 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF BLOCK 3, SAID REVISED PLAT OF BRQOKW006 TERRACE; 1�. I t I Q : ��� I THENCE RUN SQO'0019 W ALONG THE EAST BOUNDARY OF SAID BLOCK 3, REVISED PLAT OF BROOKWOOD i.: I ���� a, . ti a. •�, .� g TERRACE, A DISTANCE OF 310.02 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF LOT F r , f X 12 6, 0 SAID BLOCK 3, REVISED fi i. n T4' t4 c� . A t4 PLAT OF BRQOK .� � z WOAD TERRA THENCE RUN N89 14 W CE, '22 ALONG THE SOUTHERLY BOUNDARY OF SAID LOT I .� _ o I (ASPHALT) I t AND ITS WESTERLY EXTENSION, A DISTANCE OF 311.44 FEET TO A POINT ON THE WESTERLY BOUNDARY OF ' ' I::ca �• ��3r8i 1st 13.: (ASPtIALT} . i 3 F.A. KENNEDYS ADDITION, THENCE RUN N00'15 26 E ALONG 1 y I 29.74:FL , 11iE WEST BOUNDARY OF F.A. KENNEDYS FAIR ` LANE ADDi11QN, _A DISTANCE OF 310.10 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. I c . 1. x 16' ,� CONTAINING 96,349 SQUARE FEET OR 2.21 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. I I x , 1. I ON -SITE TBM �' . - i °, ZONE W SET'` N &T .�,�k9�`' 21• ! Y EL= 32.49 NAVD68 `�'i '' I 1z' s x :. 55'R 55'R = o THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY APPEARS TO BE IN ZONE IN ACCORDANCE WITH TH 1• x :. X, E FIRM MAP OF THE " o CITY OF CLEARWATER COMMUNITY PAN .- , . • EL 125096, MAP NUMBER 12103C- 0108 -H MAP REVISED MAY I `� ? c'g= X X 32 ,.,7 _ r 17, A , > 'l ` O 1 `Fs y 1 :;� � �� 24. x 9 � ryh� ,�O 2005. 1: I PREPARED FOR F i -Wro t 50 14' -2r X I SP COUNTRY CLUB HOMES LLC i �� �,R t4' ON-SITE TBM LS26 :1 50 R 50'R SET N &T TO UTILI TY' s� j 1. , $;. 1s EL= z7.79 NAVD88 INLET GRATE INLET A SURVEY ABBREVIATIONS TOP ETEV= 25.84 POLE 2008 ' S. NY. EL= 23.39 (15' RCP} t2• CD ((( T a A =ARC LENGTH ! I Gt I FPP = FOUND PINCHED PEE X X z 9`O _ PROP = PROPERTY _ l m 10 5 10 I A/C = AIR CONDITIONER = - I .l : I . •. I' DJ I ` ' 65 SG�ryr i 16 - FRM FLOOD PSM - PROFESSIONAL SURVEYOR MAPPER 1 _ j� nn (1�(�(�f j(�f ��5 �V% n (� 3r E-- �, may. AF ALUMINUM El?7CE FZL -FLOOD ZOtE UNE 'PT = POINT � TANGENCY ) XhT� g� nWa UUL!�U�lNECI 11 DS FWOUlI , c� I ALUM = ALUlCtd1N GAR = GARAGE PVAIi = PAVEMENT c� I x (jjj //�� jj�1f jj((�� /jpp�� �j'jj (�jj 110 R ASPH = AsPNAIT G!E = aASS ENCLOSURE RAD = RAD�S htrilUVl� tn1 © ©� U ll Ufa : BFE =BASE FLOOD ELEVATION HRif =HOG YaRE F1310E R = RECORD (ASPHALT) O o X BLDG = BUILDING NWL = HIGH WATER LIME REF = REFERENCE J P.B. 11, PAGE 16 "' ?� x x Bx = BLDCK INV - INVERT ( ? - RES = RESIDENCE w I `' ?> ?a 1 BM = BENCH NARK LB = LAND SURVEYING BUSINESS RL = RADIAL UNE I t . I .J " :. I" � ^ � 1 t� k1 : ''x• ?> ?s EaDY = BOUNDARY LFE - LOWEST FLOOR E1fV f6S = REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR BRG = LNG UT = LOWtSf HORIZONTAL SUPPORiiNG MEIaBER FOND = ROUND j�L!!�(((��(� ((�I jI�� j�p o (��/j (j O - BWF = BARBED PARE FENCE LS = LAND SURVEYOR RNG =RANG KELL�L5 U S SUMM 1! WON 20' I a ( �. # ,¢V, C = CALCULATED M = MEASURED RRS = RAiL ROAD SPIKE �� yy I , CB = CHORD BEARING MAS = M - RIGHT-OF-WAY BOOK 11, PAGE 24} ( -. f% e`? r MITERED R/W = RIGHT OF WAY I IDS = CONaTLIE BLOCK STRUCTURE MES = MITERED END SECTION SCM =BET CONCRETE MONUMENT 6 'Ij�4f. 1 • ' I I X� 3 : t}ID = CHORD MH = MANHOLE SA = SCREENED ENCLOSURE OL - CENTERLINE MHWL = MEAN HIGH WATER LINE SEC = SECTION 200'R LA-- CLF = CHAIN LINK FENCE MSL = MEAN SEA LEVEL - r SET NkD -SET NAIL AND DISK R 2512 a_Os = Ctow N&B = NAIL AND BOTTLE CAP >g.` : °n i SIR = SET 1/2' RON ROD 2512 h�' �' . }' fi+ . s Tj 'lv COL" = COLUMN N&D = NAIL AND DISK / .,v (ASPHALT} � �J _ SO =SQUARE CONC = CON CRf1E N &T = NAB AND TAB _ ` � - SPLIT RAIL FENCE CR = COUNTY ROAD HGVD = NATIONAL GEODETIC VERTICAL DATUM SR = STATE ROAD STY = STORY f w: I EOP 0.5' CURB TREES _ sly No = treat _ a I 20 , _ 0/A OVERALL SUB - SUBDIVISION i ca `3' , COV = COVERED AREA OiW = OVERHEAD S = SIDEWALK � k .�. Coe PALM TREE D - DEED OR = .. �- � `V I OFFICIAL RECORDS - '� X e? 1® DOT = DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION TB -- i BAR ON 0/S OFFSET TBM = TEMPORARY BENCH MARK ,�• 00 - WILLOW TREE DTrnc = DRAINAGE _ i o I _ X` ' D = OR! Y P PUT TC = TOP OF CURB 110 R p , 00 — OAK TREE /W VErrA PB =PLAT eoaK TOO = TOP OF BANK I I to I (� EL OR ELEV = ELEVATION PC = POINT OF CURVE lT)S =TOE SLq'E a I I V C) X ?6 a Do — CAMPHOR TREE EOP _ EDGE OF PAVE?tENT PCG = PONi OF COMPOUND CURVE TRANS = TRANSFORM ® x� 1kti X Gn _ EOW = � OF WATER PCP = PERMANENT CONTROL POINT TWP = TOWNSHIP G"t C C�� LSD PLAT II �6r M� AUSTRALIAN PINE TREE Eswr = EASEMENT PG = PACE TYP TYPICAL Ol! > wo - Faa = FOUND CONCRETE MONUMENT PK = PARKER KALON UG = UNDERGROUND _ . PINE TREE , _ o pn �' L FES FLARED ETD SECTION i B , �IIUV aLI 1717 O�L !I L�UilUUln1 04'Q — PLJN FlP = FOUND RON PIPE 9 I 9 t5 TERRACE Ira l� PL PROPERTY LINE U11L - UTILITY .y � � �i' • " K TREE POB = POINT OF BEGINNING � = WOOD ; 1 ! ! I 2s P 20 _ FIR = FOUND RON ROD POC = POINT OF CCMMENCEMENT WF = WOOD FENCE X (PLAT BOOK 8, PAGE 34) MIMOSA TREE FL = FLOW LYNNE POL = PONT ON UNE WiF = WROUGHT IRgd FENCE 1 ON -SITE TBM RD = ITan PP = POWER POLE WT = WROUGH ' i I SET N&T arm - MAGNOLIA TREE ) � , �, _ FND =UND PRC = PONT OF REVERSE CURVATURE WRF = WIRE FENCE t 1 t ! o EL= 31.37 NAVOM _ ,� e CEDAR TREE FOUND OPEN PiPE PRM = PERMANENT REFERENCE MONUMENT WV = WATER VALVE .� 00'� FPC = FLORIDA POWER COW. ! t I o EVERGREEN TREE ! i 1 ,, 200'R 10 . , ' a I x I •* ABBREVIATIONS MAY ALSO BE CONCATENATED AS REQUIRED. i Z !'' !,! . • m = j ( `'o, x _* OTHER COMMONLY RECOGNIZED AND /OR ACCEPTED ABBREVIATIONS ARE ALSO UTILIZED BUT NOT SPECIFIED HEREON. �sg a BLOCK 12� TERRACE GENERAL NOTES (PLAT BOOK 8, PAGE 34) 14� 1. UNLESS OTHERWISE STATED, THE PROPERTY DESCRIPTION SHOWN HEREON WAS PROVIDED BY THE CLIENT, OR CLIENTS 1 a, x? �" ���c;a L E G E D DESIGNATED AGENT. I•. .� I �� t1o'R t 1" •! I n° EOP �' " 2. UNDERGROUND IMPROVEMENTS, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMM TO BUILDING FOUNDATIONS, HAVE NOT BEEN LOCATED I r 1 e �x ( - VERIZON MANHOLE EXCEPT AS SHOWN HEREON. A- 3. .! �® ,k ?s - P 3. INACCESSIBLE ABOVE GROUND IMPROVEMENTS E.G. BUILDING I ' t ECP POWER POLE LDING OVERHANGS, THOSE WITHIN SECURED AREAS ETC. HAVE tio� x xti xtie — - - - — - NOT BEEN LOCATED EXCEPT AS SHOWN HEREON. }, I T 1 , OVERHEAD ORES 4, UNLESS OTHERWISE STATED, THIS SURVEY WAS PREPARED WITHOUT THE BENEFIT � A TITLE SEARCH AND MAY I ! I - LIGHT POLE BE ... x I SUBJECT TO ADDITIONAL .I . t � D ANAL EASEMENTS, AND OTHER MATTERS OF RECORD. iD -- ROAD SIGN 5. THERE ARE NO VISIBLE ENCROACHMENTS, EXCEPT AS SHOWN HEREON. ® - METER POLE 6. BECAUSE OF THE POSSIBILITY OF MOVEMENT OF THE MONUMENTATiON FROM ITS ORIGINAL PLACEMENT BY PER 1 f SONS t. (ASPHALT) ' _ OTHER THAN THE SURVEYOR, IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT PRIOR TO ANY NEW IMPROVEMENTS ON THE PROPERTY _ .. C --� TOP OF BANK THE POSITION OF THE MONUMENTAiION BE VERIFIED. 1 �� --� - GUY WIRE 7. UNAUTHORIZED COPIES AND/OR REPRODUCTIONS VIA ANY MEDIUM I' W. EXTENSION I OF THIS I i OF � 1s / DOCUMENT OR ANY PORTIONS THEREOF (ASPHALT) x 0 : D DRAINAGE ARE EXPRESSLY P , ( U LOTs6, BLOCK 3 O GE MANHOLE ESSL PROHIBITED WITHOUT THE SIGNING SURVEYORS WRITTEN CONSENT. 1 _ t REVISED PLAT OF ? > D4 WATER VALVE 8. MEASURED BEARINGS ARE IN REFERENCE TO FLORIDA STATE PLANE COORDINATE GRID NORTH WEST ZON NOR t J 1 ®. E, NORTH 12 WAY - Z , _ AMERICAN DATUM OF 1983 1990 READJUSTMENT), AS EST I. BR TERRACE m I FIR 1/2 B.F.P ( T), ESTABLISHED BY THE NATIONAL GEODETIC SURVEY. ! . 8 WAY I P GATE VALVE 9. ALL BUILDING TIES PROP I ERTY MARKER LOCATIONS AND 0 41v I 1 ( I ~ , S. BND #2512 _ OTHER SITE IMPROVEMENT LOCATIONS SHOWN HEREON ARE •� ,�. A> �, Y Of BOLLARD MEASURED PERPENDICULAR TO ADJACENT BOUNDARY LINES UNLESS ! N89 2214 W �� i s , SS OTHERWISE STATED. (SE) �> 311.44 M• 31 LoT s �? BLOCK - WATER METER 10. FLOOD ZONE DESIGNATION AND/OR 0 x 1 I a RC � .� o p Q / FLOOD ZONE LINES (IF ANY) SHOWN HEREON HAVE BEEN SCALED FROM THE FIR 1/2 '�' O - CLEANOUT REFERENCED MAP AND ARE APPROXIMATE. THE TRUE FLOOD ZONE LINES MUST BE DETERMINED BY AN ENGINEER. 110'R 11. THIS SURVEY DOES NOT DETERMINE OR IMPLY t ! ! #2512 h� '> �� F OWNERSHIP. D -FIBER OPTIC WARNING POST S.E. CORNER 12, THERE MAY E B ADDITIONAL RESTRICTIONS; EASEMENTS OR OTHER MATTERS OF RECORD THAT ARE NOT SHOWN 1 OF LOT 6 30' ' - FIRE HYDRANT HEREON THAT MAY BE . 1. GRATE INLET FOUND IN THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF THIS COUNTY. TOP M.= 25.sz - LID 13. SUBSURFACE UTILITY LOCATIONS SHOWN HEREON ARE BASED ON UTILITY DELINEATION PROVIDED BY GEOMASTERS INC. LS26 N. INV. EL= 23.00 15 RCP t i , s INV. EL = 22 9 tB' RCP) B.F.P. - BACK FLOW PREVENTER AND ARE LIMITED TO THE SOUTH RIGHT - -OF -WAY OF DREW STREET", AND THE EAST RIGHT -OF -WAY OF BETTY LANE ADJACENT TO F.A. KENNEDYS SUBDIVISION MONITORING WELL ? ' 12° T 14. ELEVATIONS SHOWN HEREON ARE BASED ON THE NATIONAL GEODETIC SURVEYS BENCHMARK 'BREEZE W' AT WHICH THE L2 SIR I is I� CABLE WARNING SIGN ELEVATION IS REPORTED AS 43.93 FEET N.A.V.D.88. � x D (ASPHALT) ?m" ti°�`'� t. x ?�, 6� ��' � D - U.G. DRAINAGE LINE k� ! SIR 0.5' CURB x t3, ti Xti x ' Q I 200'R BOUNDARY AND TOPOGWHIC SURVEY µ._ REVISION: ADDED TREES AND ET.EVATiONS ON 10 /08/2007 070172A.DWG VJ ; ST BOUNDARY FOR RIGHT -OF -WAY EASEMENT ON 12/13/2007 (070172A- 2.DWG) CERTIFICATION: I HTREBY'CER7Y- �jk1dBE?�F 600 'lSo1�EDCE'AND BRIEF JOB NUMBER: 070172 DATE SURVEYED: 07 19 2007 THAT THE SURVEY SHOWN HERE STANTTALt_Y =�Nlru►w TECHNICAL DRAWING FILE: 070172.DWG DATE DRAWN: 08 02 2007 STANDARDS FOR LAND" SURVEY! •DE It1 i�iP, rAJE O ,.,A0RIDA RULE 61G17, F.A.C. FURTHERMORE; THIS FIC SHALL, NOT TOLA y OTHER PERSONS LAST REVISION: 12 13 2007 X REFERENCE: N/A OR PARTIES OTHER THANTHOSE: N ET7a THIS9, SURvEt AND SHACK NOT BE VAUD AND BINDING "AGAINST TH€ UNDER ED SURVEiOR Wi�H(k�T VE `ORIGINAL GEORGE A. S H RAISED AND Sl( tA* THE FLORIDA LK TISED SURjIEEYE t iND MAPPER. l% ASSO(; �+,S, MCO O • . LAND SURVEYORS LAND PLANNERS GEOR A. SHRR t. J� ' i , !) `LAND SURVEYOR No. 2512 3301 IIeSOPO BOIILh'Y�rYD, SlliT1f' !1 GREGORY 'A. $HIMP; PROFESSION L�SU�VEYOR� S ,MAPPER No. 6161 P BiRBOh; FLORIlI� 34683 ,.. ... ". ..,.... _ ... r ._,,. o 4 t "sa s i - - LB 1834 PBOff 7?.7 78.0-5-ON FIX 727 786 -125G I N. 1/4 CORNER OF SECTION 15, TWP, 29 S., RNG. 15 E., PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA f X ( = lb 1 t I. 1 I I 1 r 1 f 4 O f i R' k X ON-SITE TBM �; • I.. 1 1 1 1C $' ' SET N &T e t � ^r 1 EV o _ 4 0 ((� j� MANOR 0��� IMIQ l a _ � Boa 3 EL 29.40 NA BB o 1 1 6__ c W 0 1° I 1 r 1 ;k APARTMENTS M, .1 I M h o� , e� - x � r(j � M 3t 1. D I 'S .— M 1 'G 'i� h ..1 P '� , ti ® 0 0 B9 M 1 6 M x CO -Op X � t -v x l _ X M o w d i 4 � 14 Q d 4r (ASPHALT) � t ' • -31,9' 19 ASPHAL t •p CI t ., ( T1 i 25 fL 3 3O.itct� - 1. ° � I 2s. - - 74. t s t I FL t t I O -`mob •y - 1 - '�a � ° -t• i I. ti x <b �a• B" , PORTION OF i THROUGH , REVISED PLAT OF :•#t Nil TERRACE, RECORDED : #t PAGE 34, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA. TOGETHER POR11ON OF LOTS # UGH 8, F.A. KENNEDYS FAIR LANE ADDITION, RECORDED PLAT :i/ PAGE 16, OF THE PUBLJC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA. BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING 1' TH 1/4 CORNER OF # N 15, TOWNSHIP 29 SOUTH, RANGE RUN S8918'56*E ALONG THE NORTH BOUNDARY OF SAID SEC11ON 15, A DISTANCE OF 1,093.85 FEET, THENIC11 RUN S0015'53*W, A DISTANCE OF 31.80 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF KELLETS SUBDIVISION, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 11, PAGE 24, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA; THENCE RUN S891W281, A DISTANCE OF 1 1# FEET TO THE NORTHWEST t' ER OF F.A. KENNEDYS ADDITION, RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 11, PAGE 16, OF / "i OF 1 COUNTY, .FLORIDA, SAID POiNT ALSO BEING THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE RUN S89'21'09*E ALONG THE NORTH BOUNDARIES OF ) F.A. KENNEDYS ADDITION 1 REVISED PLAT OF BROOKWOOD TERRACE, RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 8, PAGE 34, OF R OF ECOUNTY, t' 1' A DISTANCE OF # # 7 FEETJO THE NORTHEAST i' OF BLOCK 1 REVISED PLAT OF BROOKWOOD TERRACE; THENCE tt ll • ALONG BOUNDARY OF 1 BLOCK a/ PLAT OF BROOKWOOD TERRACE, A DISTANCE OF 310.02 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 6, OF SAID BLOCK 3, REVISED PLAT OF :'11 111 TERRAC�' THENCE RUN 89ALONG r E` BOUNDARY OF SAID LOT AND ITS WESTERLY DMSION, A DISTANCE OF 311.44 FEET TO A POINT ON THE WESTERLY BOUNDARY OF F.A. KENNEDYS ADDITION, THENCE RUN N0015'26*E ALONG THE WEST BOUNDARY OF F.A. KENNEDYS FAIR LANE ADDITION, DISTANCE OF i i FEET TO THE POINT OF CONTAINING 96,349 SQUARE FEET OR ACRES, MORE OR FLOOD ZON THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY APPEARS TO BE IN ZONE X, IN ACCORDANCE NTH THE FIRM MAP OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, COMMUNITY PANEL 125096, MAP NUMBER 12103C-0108-H, MAP REVISED MAY 17, 2005. PREPARED FOR SP COUNTRY CLUB HOMES LLC rvu 4 I T ( P L. RCPj . . . I (ASPHALT] ' _ I ( • 1 4 SURVEY ABBREVIATIONS A =ARC LENGTH FPP = FOUND PINCHED PPE PROP = PROPERTY 10 A C = AIR COtUR10NER 9u i ` 0h ti 1° / - FRM = FRAME PS/ = PROFESSIONAL SURVEYOR fl MAPPER F ° 3r i tie • R i ry51° ALUM ALUMINUM AMU�CE FZL = FLOOD ZONE LINE PT = POINT OF TANGENCY GAR = GARAGE PVMi = PAVEMENT z`c3 I X X ! 11O'R ASPH = ASPHALT GA = GLASS ENCLOSURE RAD - RADIUS 1 ' I fl fl - — _ _ BA FLOOD ELEVATION tNWf =HOG WIRE FENCE R = RECORD F t: (ASPHALT) a X HWL HIGH WATER LINE REF = REFERENCE .I •.1 4 ) (P.B. 11, PAGE 16) "' �F x x RES = RESIDENCE � _ �� INY = INVERT - I w �j, X62 t BM = BENCH MARK LB = LAND SURVEYING BUSINESS RL = RADIAL LINE 1 I __ x ' LFE = LOWEST FLOOR ElEV RLS = REGISTERED [AND SURVEYOR 1 t 1 1 •1' 4 o I �b PS. ! ��1 BRGY BEARING�Y LHSM = LOWEST HORIZONTAL SUPPORTING MEMBER FIND = ROUND IjtN/�Ij'((�� tI1I fpi hI��j'D D� D f t " -E t Js• Po r BWF =BAND WORE FENCE LS = LAND SURVEYOR RNG = RANG tL1115L°�L�15 U VL7�� U!!�?� ©UV 20 I Q 1 3 3 Q C= CALCULATED M= MEASURED RRS =RAIL ROAD SPIKE ( P LA T BOOK 11, PAGE 24) G v CB = CHORD BEARING MAS = MASONRY R/W = RiGNT - OF -WAY Q CBS = CONCRETE BLOCK SiRUCTURE MES = MITERED END SECTION _ SCM = SET CONCRETE MONUMENT pf 3 CL - CHORD _ _ d tii fit, X , MH - MANHOiE SA - SCREENED ENCLOSURE CL = CENTERLINE MHWL = MEAN HIGH WATER LINE SEC = SECTION ! t 0— u> r GF CHAIN ILK FENCE MSL = MEAN SEA LEVEL _ i ge' cis , SET N&D - SET NAIL AND DISK R 2512 nn CLOS = CLOSURE N&B = NAIL AND BOTTLE CAP SR =SET 1/2 RON ROD R 2512 COL 22 = COLUMN N&D = NAIL AND DISK SO = SOUARE 1 I 24 CONIC = CONCRETE N&T = NAIL AND TAB SW = SPLIT RAIL FEND b CR = COUNTY ROAD NGVD = NATIONAL GEODETIC VERTICAL DATUM SR = STATE ROAD 'I` c EOP 0.5° CURB m 1 C C/S = CONCRETE SLAB NO = NUMBER STY = STORY 1 i e t I i 20 1' O/A = OVERALL SUB = SUBDIVISION �, _ Cov - COVERED AREA aNw = OVERHEAD WvRE(s) S/W = SIDEWALK 3 k h 1 fV PALM TREE = DEED OR = OFFICIAL RECORDS - 1 : r I `�J �•; � �, X yd G5 1� DOT = DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 0 S = OFFSET TB - 'T' BAR 1 1 o cn . nc 00'0 - WILLOW TREE / - TBM = TEMPORARY BENCH MARK �+' DUNG = DRAINAGE P =PLAT TC = TOP OF CURB OAK TREE I i �• � I x 110'R o OMti9 - D/W = DRIVEWAY PB = FLAT BOOK TOM = TO' OF BANK ,° .. .. Co t EL OR ETEV = ELEVATION PC = POUT OF CURVE TOS =TOE OF SLOE I or_ X �,� o 00 - CAMPHOR TREE EDP = EDGE G PAVDW PCC = POINT OF COMPOUND CURVE TRANS = TRANNGORMER iB• 1�� ° X cn OM� _ EOW - EDGE Of WATER PCP = PERMANENT CONTROL POUT TWP = TOWNSHIP ti REWSED PLAT OF l,A� AUSTRALIAN PINE TREE ESMT= EASEMENT PG = PAGE TYP = TYPICAL j OM•b -PINE TREE FCM =FOUND (X1NCFttTE MONUMENT PK = PARKER KALCN UG = UNDERGROUND ° t5• ; D ° 0 0 ,' 0 0 D ° ° a - . ' OR _ FES =FLARED END SECTION PL = PROPERTY LINE UTIL = UTILITY 8s I I I s ., yh BROOXVOOD TERRACE � PUNK TREE F1P _ FOUND RON APE POB = POINT O" BEGINNING WD = WOOD t j 1 2s e ' 1h 20' FIR = FOUND RON ROD POC = POINT OF COMMENCEMENT WF = WOOD FENCE a= �b x (PLAT BOOK 8, PAGE 34) MIMOSA TREE FL = FLOW LINE POL = POINT ON UNE - 1 - � W1F - WROUGHT IRON FENCE ¢ t , p ( ON SITE TBM rs DD'® RD = FIELD PP = POWER POLE WT = WITNESS MAGNOLIA TREE SET N&T , FND = FOUND PRC = POINT OF REVERSE CURVATURE WRF = WRE FENCE EL= 31.37 HAN)8B 20• � 00% - CEDAR TREE FOP = FOUND OPEN PIPE PRM = PERMANENT REFERENCE MONUMENT WV = WATER VALVE u°z L 00O - FPC = FLORIDA POWER CORP. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. � Q � EVERGREEN TREE 1 j I _ 1 200'R m �d t -- a N x * ABBREVIATIONS MAY ALSO BE CONCATENATED AS REQUIRED. I z t a, : •* OTHER COMMONLY RECOGNIZED AND /OR ACCEPTED ABBREVIATIONS ARE ALSO UTILIZED BUT NOT SPECIFIED HEREON. (ASPHALT) °g 1�11 4s Al, 1 9i GENERAL NOTES z ^x� 9 Q I BLOCK 0 126 8:k 1 TERRACE E t4• (PLAT BOOK 8, PAGE 34) r t I o d ��, 1. UNLESS OTHERWISE STATED, THE PROPERTY DESCRIP110N SHOWN HEREON WAS PROVIDED BY THE CLIENT, OR CLIENT'S ( ,� x m ���° � L G D DESIGNATED AGENT. - °J 110'R _ 2 UNDERGROUND IMPROVEMENTS, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO BUILDING FOUNDATIONS HAVE NOT BEEN LOCATED 7'.1 nX EOP Q - VtRIZON MANHOLE EXCEPT AS SHOWN HEREON. cs ! 1 �� �k �s - 3. INACCESSIBLE ABOVE GROUND IMPROVEMENTS UILDING OVERHANGS, t E� 1 POWER POLE (E.G. ( ANGS, THOSE WITHIN SECURED AREA x ti ti� � S, ETC.), HAVE x X , -- - - - --- - OVERHEAD WIRES NOT BEEN LOCATED EXCEPT AS SHOWN HEREON. 1 �� 4. UNLESS OTHERWISE STATED l , _ , THIS SURVEY WAS PREPARED WITHOUT THE BENETIT OF A TITLE SEARCH AND MAY BE t.t I; LIGHT POLE � SUBJECT TO ADDITIONAL EASEMENTS, RIGHT OF WAYS, AND OTHER MATTERS � RECORD. t, -1 I] - ROAD SIGN 5. THERE ARE NO VISIBLE ENCROACHMENTS, EXCEPT AS SHOWN HEREON. 1. 1 I' �'� ` = M - 6. BECAUSE OF THE POSSIBILITY OF MOVEMENT OF TH ❑ METER POLE E MONUMENTATION FROM ITS ORIGINAL PLACEMENT BY PERSONS t C : ,z, _ _ OTHER THAN THE SURVEYOR IT iS RECOMMENDED THAT PRIOR TO ANY NEW IMPROVEMENTS ON THE PROPERTY 1.. .. .. '• . .. , .� .. � o (ASPHALT) ,° m� TOP OF BANK a --1 200'R - THE POSITION OF THE MONUMENTATiON BE VERIFIED. 13 � GUY WIRE • f �1� ! 7. UNAUTHORIZED L W Ej(TENSION,� � I ORIZED COPIES AND/OR REPRODUCTIONS VIA ANY MEDIUM 'Y. t M OF THIS DOCUMENT :I 1: 1 (ASPHALT) x B ® - DRAINAGE MANHOLE RE EXPRESSLY PROHIBITED OR ANY PORTIONS THEREOF o i .�;, LOT'6, BLOCK 3 x 1 OLE IBITID WITHOUT THE SIGNING SURVEYOR'S WRITTEN CONSENT. "p ,{� 42 . .,. REVISED PLAT OF , ., DQ -WATER VALVE 8. MEASURED BEARINGS ARE IN REFERENCE TO FLORIDA STATE PLANE COORDINATE GRID NORTH, WEST ZONE, NORTH ' I ' 12 WAY `� AMERICAN DATUM t I. BR TERRACE m FiR 1 2° B.F.P _ 983 (1990 READJUSTMENT ]I, AS ESTABLISHED BY THE NATIONAL GEODETIC SURVEY. fir' I 8 WAY I ` ti- ! 2512 GATE VALVE 9. ALL BUILDING TIES, PROPERTY MARKER LOCATIONS AND OTHER SITE IMPROVEMENT LOCATIONS I I, . r S. 3NDY -BOLLARD SHOWN HEREON ARE NS9 2214 W S •'� n r �6 t MEASURED PERPENDICULAR TO ADJACENT BOUNDARY LINES, UNLESS OTHERWISE STATED. LOT 6 ® -WATER METER 10. FLOOD ZONE DESIGNATION AND /OR FLOOD ZONE LINES IF ANY SHOWN HEREON HAVE BEEN SCALED FROM ? E o, 311.44 M; 31p RC �� 66 ti�1 @� Q ( ) THE s� DDj (� tx i FIR 1/2° i y� • � . BL�,O BLOCK � REFERENCED MAP AND ARE APPROXIMATE THE TRUE FLOOD ZONE LINES MUST BE DETERMINED BY AN ENGINEER. ° 2512 I �,, tip' © - CLEANOUT I D h ° 110 R 0 _ 11. THIS SURVEY DOES NOT DETERMINE OR IMPLY OWNERSHIP. F19ER OPTIC WARNING POST a . 1 S.E. CORNER 12 THERE MAY BE ADDITIONAL RESTRICTIONS EASEMENTS OR OTHER MATTERS OF RECORD AT ,1 f I OF LOT 6 t - FIRE HYDRANT THAT ARE NOT SHOWN t :t.' GRATE INLET HEREON THAT MAY BE FOUND IN THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF THIS COUNTY. I' `f LS26 I �' �`•a 25.92 - LID 13. SUBSURFACE UTILITY LOCATIONS SHOWN HEREON ARE BASED ON UTILITY DELINEATION PROVIDED BY GEOMASTERS, INC. N. INN. E_= 23,OM t5 RCP) B.F.P. _ A AND ARE LIMITED TO THE SOUTH RIGHT -OF -WAY OF DREW STREET, AND THE EAST RIGHT -OF -WAY OF BETTY LANE 1 I t s MNV. EL= 2299 (18- RCP) BACK FLOW PREVENTER si, t ( ` i f - _ ADJACENT TO F.A. KENNEDYS SUBDIVISION & P , i MONITORING WELL :' t2• ; _ 14. ELEVATIONS SHOWN HEREON ARE BASED ON THE NATIONAL GEODETIC SURVEYS BENCHMARK 'BREEZE W,° AT WHICH THE t • •, SIR I 16 k� ?l J�x ��, �1h © CABLE WARNING SIGN ELEVATION IS REPORTED AS 43.93 FEET N.A.V.D.88. 1 .� 1 (ASPHALT} U ?6 ti F• t3• x o - U.G. DRAINAGE LINE ' x e, x TOPOGRAPHIC 6y° .' : ' SIR �. 0.5' Ci RB X 200'R t3 , REVISION: ADDED TREES AND ELEVATIONS ON 10 /08/2007 (070172A.DWG) REVISED W1ST BOUNDARY FOR RIGHT -OF -WAY EASEMENT ON 12/13/2007 (070172A- 2.DF1G) CERTIFICATION: I HEREBY CERTIFY "T« BE•: oWacE AND BELIEF JOB NUMBER: 070172 DATE SURVEYED: 07L19/2007 THAT THE SURVEY SHOWN `.HERtEL I ATM TI �F�UVIMUM TECHNICAL DRAWING FILE: 070172 DWG DATE DRAWN: 08 02 2007 STANDARDS FOR LAND SUR G�'DESCRIEL�I�IHE� tA�� FCQRIDA RULE 61GI7, F A C RIRl}IFRi1nRF1" i1JICs !`ATftNh` cuet v unT n Tn euv >'n`rurn o�cn�ic I ACT RC\flCl(1N• 17 /11 /"n7 V DCCCDCMIl�C. At /A