Loading...
05/23/2012 MUNICIPAL CODE ENFORCEMENT BOARD MEETING MINUTES CITY OF CLEARWATER May 23, 2012 Present: Michael Boutzoukas Chair Duane Schultz Vice-Chair Sheila Cole Board Member James E. Strickland Board Member Sue A. Johnson Board Member Wayne Carothers Board Member Absent: Michael J. Riordon Board Member Also Present: Andy Salzman Attorney for the Board Camilo Soto Assistant City Attorney Nicole Sprague Secretary to the Board Patricia O. Sullivan Board Reporter The Chair called the meeting to order at 1:30 p.m. at City Hall, followed by the Pledge of Allegiance. To provide continuity for research, items are in agenda order although not necessarily discussed in that order. The Chair outlined the procedures and stated any aggrieved party may appeal a final administrative order of the Municipal Code Enforcement Board to the Circuit Court of Pinellas County within thirty days of the execution of the order. Florida Statute 286.0105 requires any party appealing a decision of this Board to have a record of the proceedings. 2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES – April 25, 2012 Member Johnson moved to approve the minutes of the regular Municipal Code Enforcement Board meeting of April 25, 2012, as submitted in written summation to each board member. The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously. 3. PUBLIC HEARINGS 3.1 Case 17-12 – Continued from April 25, 2012 LOM Inc. 311 S. Gulfview Boulevard Banners & Flags/Attached Signs in Non-Residential Districts/Signage w/o Permits/Window Signs – Weaver Staff reported Case 17-12 was continued to June 27, 2012. 3.2 Case 20-12 Hickory Grove Condo Assn., Inc. 9 Turner Street Roof Maintenance – Schaar Code Enforcement 2011-05-23 1 Property Manager Brian Sawyer was present to represent the condominium association. Inspector Shelby Schaar provided a PowerPoint presentation. A notice of violation was issued on December 27, 2011 following the first inspection. Violations at 9 Turner Street relate to maintenance of the roof and mansard roof. Property photographs on December 20, 2011 and April 19, 2012 showed deterioration of the wood mansard roof and black and blue tarps attached to the mansard roof, covering a unit window. Property Manager Sawyer admitted to the violation. Member Cole moved to find the Respondent(s) in violation of the City of Clearwater Code of Ordinances as referred to in the affidavit in this case. The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously. Inspector Schaar recommended the two violations be considered separately and that compliance be met by: 1) removing tarps and plywood by June 22, 2012 or a fine of $100 per day be imposed and 2) repairing mansard roof by July 22, 2012 or a fine of $100 per day be imposed. Property Manager Sawyer reviewed issues already resolved so that necessary repairs can be authorized. He said once engineering plans to repair or replace the mansard roof are received on May 30, 2012, the association will obtain bids and then approve a special assessment to cover related costs. In response to a question, Mary Ann Caltheirone, President of the Hickory Grove Condo Association, said she thought the assessment will pass, noting the repairs are necessary. She said tarps have been in place for approximately one year. Chuck Butt, member of Viewpoint on the Bay Board of Directors, said the tarps have been up too long, are unsightly, and negatively impact nearby property values. Discussion ensued with concern expressed that tarps should not be removed until repairs can be made or more water will intrude into the condominium unit. It was stated that problems with leaks have been evident for a long time and need to be resolved quickly. Assistant City Attorney Camilo Soto submitted composite exhibits. Member Carothers moved to enter an order requiring the Respondent to correct the violations on or before July 22, 2012. If the Respondent does not comply within the time specified, the Board may order a fine of $100 per day per violation for each day each violation continues to exist. The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously. This case came before the City of Clearwater Code Enforcement Board on May 23, 2012, after due notice to the Respondent(s), and having heard testimony under oath and received evidence, the Board issues the following Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Order: FINDINGS OF FACT Code Enforcement 2011-05-23 2 Based upon the testimony and evidence received, it is evident that the roof and mansard roof require maintenance and tarps need to be removed. A representative of the Respondent(s) was present. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW 3- The Respondent(s) is/are in violation of the City of Clearwater Code Section(s) 1502.D.1, 3-1502.D.3, and 3-1502.D.5 as referred in the Affidavit in this case. ORDER It is the Order of the Board that the Respondent(s) shall comply with said Section(s) of the City of Clearwater Community Development Code by July 22, 2012. If Respondent(s) does/do not comply within the time specified, the Board may order a fine of $100.00 per day per violation for each day each violation continues to exist. Upon complying with said Section(s) of the Code, the Respondent(s) shall notify Inspector Shelby Schaar, who shall inspect the property and notify the Board of compliance. If the Respondent(s) fails/fail to comply within the time specified, a certified copy of the Order imposing the fine may be recorded in the Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida, and once recorded shall constitute a lien against any real property owned by the Respondent(s), pursuant to Chapter 162, Florida Statutes. Any aggrieved party may petition the Board to reconsider or rehear any Board Order resulting from a public hearing. A petition for rehearing must be made in writing and filed with the Board Secretary no later than thirty days after the execution of the Order and prior to the filing of any appeal. Upon receipt of the petition, the Board will consider whether or not to reconsider or rehear the case. The Board will not hear oral argument or evidence in determining whether to grant the petition to reconsider or rehear. Any aggrieved party may appeal a final administrative Order of the Municipal Code Enforcement Board to the Circuit Court of Pinellas County within thirty (30) days of the execution of the Order. Florida Statute 286.0105 requires any party appealing a decision of this Board to have a record of the proceedings. DONE AND ORDERED this 23rd day of May 2012, at Clearwater, Pinellas County, Florida. 3.3 Case 21-12 - WITHDRAWN Ciro Romero 1247 Grove Street Residential Rental Business Tax Receipt – McMahan Staff reported that Case 21-12 had been withdrawn 3.4 Case 22-12 LOM Inc. 311 S. Gulfview Boulevard Sea Turtle Nesting Areas – O’Neil Gilad Ovaknin, representative for LOM Inc., was present Code Enforcement 2011-05-23 3 Inspector Corey O’Neil provided a PowerPoint presentation. A notice of violation was issued on August 5, 2011 following the first inspection. The violation at 311 S. Gulfview Boulevard relates to site lighting which violates sea turtle nesting protection law. Property photographs taken from the beach on January 31, 2012 showed prohibited types of lights visible on the top of both parking garage roofs, through the parking garage windows, and fronting the building along Beach Walk. Property photographs taken from the beach on March 27 and May 21, 2012 showed prohibited types of lights visible on top of the north parking garage roof, through the parking garage windows, and fronting the building along Beach Walk. Gilad Ovaknin, representative for LOM Inc., admitted to the violation. Member Johnson moved to find the Respondent(s) in violation of the City of Clearwater Code of Ordinances as referred to in the affidavit in this case. The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously. Inspector O’Neil recommended compliance by June 22, 2012 or a fine of $150 per day be imposed. Mr. Ovaknin said LOM Inc. would try to comply by that date. Attorney Soto submitted composite exhibits. Member Strickland moved to enter an order requiring the Respondent to correct the violation on or before June 22, 2012. If the Respondent does not comply within the time specified, the Board may order a fine of $150 per day for each day the violation continues to exist. The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously. This case came before the City of Clearwater Code Enforcement Board on May 23, 2012, after due notice to the Respondent(s), and having heard testimony under oath and received evidence, the Board issues the following Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Order: FINDINGS OF FACT Based upon the testimony and evidence received, it is evident that site lighting violates sea turtle nesting protection law. A representative of the Respondent(s) was present. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW 3-1302.D The Respondent(s) is/are in violation of the City of Clearwater Code Section as referred in the Affidavit in this case. ORDER It is the Order of the Board that the Respondent(s) shall comply with said Section(s) of the City of Clearwater Community Development Code by June 22, 2012. If Respondent(s) does/do not comply within the time specified, the Board may order a fine of $150.00 per day for each day the violation continues to exist. Upon complying with said Section(s) of the Code, the Respondent(s) shall notify Inspector Corey O’Neil, who shall inspect the property and notify the Code Enforcement 2011-05-23 4 Board of compliance. If the Respondent(s) fails/fail to comply within the time specified, a certified copy of the Order imposing the fine may be recorded in the Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida, and once recorded shall constitute a lien against any real property owned by the Respondent(s), pursuant to Chapter 162, Florida Statutes. Any aggrieved party may petition the Board to reconsider or rehear any Board Order resulting from a public hearing. A petition for rehearing must be made in writing and filed with the Board Secretary no later than thirty days after the execution of the Order and prior to the filing of any appeal. Upon receipt of the petition, the Board will consider whether or not to reconsider or rehear the case. The Board will not hear oral argument or evidence in determining whether to grant the petition to reconsider or rehear. Any aggrieved party may appeal a final administrative Order of the Municipal Code Enforcement Board to the Circuit Court of Pinellas County within thirty (30) days of the execution of the Order. Florida Statute 286.0105 requires any party appealing a decision of this Board to have a record of the proceedings. DONE AND ORDERED this 23rd day of May 2012, at Clearwater, Pinellas County, Florida. 3.5 Case 23-12 South Beach II Assn. Inc. 1430 Gulf Boulevard Sea Turtle Nesting Areas – O’Neil Ernie Burzumato, President of the South Beach II Association, was present to represent the condominium association. Inspector Corey O’Neil provided a PowerPoint presentation. A notice of violation was issued on August 5, 2011 following the first inspection. The violation at 1430 Gulf Boulevard relates to site lighting which violates sea turtle nesting protection law. Property photographs taken from the beach on January 31 and March 27, 2012 showed prohibited types of lights visible in the parking garage. Property photographs taken from the beach on May 21, 2012 showed the violation had been corrected. Property representative Burzumato said the County Property Appraiser has the wrong address on record for the association and discussed associated delays with meeting compliance. In response to his concern that shielding lights is a safety concern, Inspector O’Neil said the association has the option to install amber lights. Inspector O’Neil requested the board issue a declaration of violation. Attorney Soto submitted composite exhibits. Member Schultz moved to find that the Respondent(s) was in violation of the City of Clearwater Community Development Code as referred to in the affidavit in this case and to enter an order that no fine be imposed against the Respondent. If the Respondent repeats the violation, the Board may order a fine for each day the violation continues to exist after the Respondent is notified of the repeat violation. The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously. Code Enforcement 2011-05-23 5 This case came before the City of Clearwater Code Enforcement Board on May 23, 2012, after due notice to the Respondent(s), and having heard testimony under oath and received evidence, the Board issues the following Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Order as follows: FINDINGS OF FACT Based on the testimony and evidence received, it is evident the condition existed; however, it is further evident this condition was corrected prior to this hearing. A representative of the Respondent(s) was present. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW The Respondent(s) was/were in violation of the City of Clearwater Community Development Code Section 3-1302.D as referred to in the Affidavit in this case. ORDER It is the Order of this Board that no fine shall be imposed against the Respondent(s). The Board further orders that if Respondent(s) repeats/repeat the violation referenced herein, the Board may order the Respondent(s) to pay a fine for each day the violation exists after the Respondent(s) is/are notified of the repeat violation. Should the violation reoccur, the Board has the authority to impose the fine at that time without a subsequent hearing. Any aggrieved party may petition the Board to reconsider or rehear any Board Order resulting from a public hearing. A petition for rehearing must be made in writing and filed with the Board Secretary no later than thirty days after the execution of the Order and prior to the filing of any appeal. Upon receipt of the petition, the Board will consider whether or not to reconsider or rehear the case. The Board will not hear oral argument or evidence in determining whether to grant the petition to reconsider or rehear. Any aggrieved party may appeal a final administrative Order of the Municipal Code Enforcement Board to the Circuit Court of Pinellas County within thirty (30) days of the execution of the Order. Florida Statute 286.0105 requires any party appealing a decision of this Board to have a record of the proceedings. DONE AND ORDERED this 23rd day of May 2012, at Clearwater, Pinellas County, Florida. 3.6 Case 24-12 Sand Key Condo – S Beach Assn., Inc. 1480 Gulf Boulevard Sea Turtle Nesting Areas – O’Neil Chair Boutzoukas declared a conflict of interest. No one was present to represent the condominium association. Code Enforcement 2011-05-23 6 Inspector Corey O’Neil provided a PowerPoint presentation. A notice of violation was issued on August 5, 2011 following the first inspection. The violation at 1480 Gulf Boulevard relates to site lighting which violates sea turtle nesting protection law. Property photographs taken from the beach on January 31 and March 27, 2012 showed prohibited types of lights visible in the parking garage and parking lots. Property photographs on May 21, 2012 showed most lights had been shielded to comply with law; several in one parking lot did not comply. He said due to a miscommunication, those lights were not shielded. He said property management assured him the remaining lights will be shielded. Member Johnson moved to find the Respondent(s) in violation of the City of Clearwater Code of Ordinances as referred to in the affidavit in this case. The motion was duly seconded. Members Schultz, Cole, Strickland, Johnson, and Carothers voted “Aye.” Chair Boutzoukas abstained. Motion carried. Inspector O’Neil recommended compliance by June 22, 2012 or a fine of $150 per day be imposed Attorney Soto submitted composite exhibits. Member Cole moved to enter an order requiring the Respondent to correct the violation on or before June 22, 2012. If the Respondent does not comply within the time specified, the Board may order a fine of $150 per day for each day the violation continues to exist. The motion was duly seconded. Members Schultz, Cole, Strickland, Johnson, and Carothers voted “Aye.” Chair Boutzoukas abstained. Motion carried. This case came before the City of Clearwater Code Enforcement Board on May 23, 2012, after due notice to the Respondent(s), and having heard testimony under oath and received evidence, the Board issues the following Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Order: FINDINGS OF FACT Based upon the testimony and evidence received, it is evident that site lighting violates sea turtle nesting protection law. The Respondent(s) was/were not present. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW 3-1302.D The Respondent(s) is/are in violation of the City of Clearwater Code Section as referred in the Affidavit in this case. ORDER It is the Order of the Board that the Respondent(s) shall comply with said Section(s) of the City of Clearwater Community Development Code by June 22, 2012. If Respondent(s) does/do not comply within the time specified, the Board may order a fine of $150.00 per day for each day the violation continues to exist. Upon complying with said Section(s) of the Code, the Respondent(s) shall notify Inspector Corey O’Neil, who shall inspect the property and notify the Board of compliance. If the Respondent(s) fails/fail to comply within the time specified, a certified copy of the Order imposing the fine may be recorded in the Public Records of Pinellas Code Enforcement 2011-05-23 7 County, Florida, and once recorded shall constitute a lien against any real property owned by the Respondent(s), pursuant to Chapter 162, Florida Statutes. Any aggrieved party may petition the Board to reconsider or rehear any Board Order resulting from a public hearing. A petition for rehearing must be made in writing and filed with the Board Secretary no later than thirty days after the execution of the Order and prior to the filing of any appeal. Upon receipt of the petition, the Board will consider whether or not to reconsider or rehear the case. The Board will not hear oral argument or evidence in determining whether to grant the petition to reconsider or rehear. Any aggrieved party may appeal a final administrative Order of the Municipal Code Enforcement Board to the Circuit Court of Pinellas County within thirty (30) days of the execution of the Order. Florida Statute 286.0105 requires any party appealing a decision of this Board to have a record of the proceedings. DONE AND ORDERED this 23rd day of May 2012, at Clearwater, Pinellas County, Florida. 4. UNFINISHED BUSINESS 4.1 Case 27-11 Affidavit of Compliance John & Louise Cross 445 Hamden Drive Unit 201 Short Term Rental – Franco 4.2 Case 28-11 Affidavit of Compliance John & Louise Cross 445 Hamden Drive Unit 202 Short Term Rental – Franco 4.3 Case 29-11 Affidavit of Compliance John & Louise Cross 445 Hamden Drive Unit 203 Short Term Rental – Franco 4.4 Case 30-11 Affidavit of Compliance John & Louise Cross 445 Hamden Drive Unit 204 Short Term Rental – Franco 4.5 Case 31-11 Affidavit of Compliance John & Louise Cross 445 Hamden Drive Unit 205 Short Term Rental – Franco 4.6 Case 32-11 Affidavit of Compliance John & Louise Cross 445 Hamden Drive Unit 306 Short Term Rental – Franco Code Enforcement 2011-05-23 8 4.7 Case 33-11 Affidavit of Compliance John & Louise Cross 445 Hamden Drive Unit 401 Short Term Rental – Franco 4.8 Case 34-11 Affidavit of Compliance John & Louise Cross 445 Hamden Drive Unit 403 Short Term Rental – Franco 4.9 Case 35-11 Affidavit of Compliance John & Louise Cross 445 Hamden Drive Unit 601 Short Term Rental – Franco 4.10 Case 36-11 Affidavit of Compliance John & Louise Cross 445 Hamden Drive Unit 605 Short Term Rental – Franco 4.11 Case 04-12 Affidavit of Compliance Karas Group LLC 2525 Gulf to Bay Boulevard Effect of Comprehensive Sign Approval – Weaver 4.12 Case 14-12 Affidavit of Compliance Todd & Dawn Pasqualone 2152 Drew Street Banners & Flags/Freestanding Signage-Area/Signage w/o Permits – Weaver 4.13 Case 16-12 Affidavit of Compliance Branch Banking & Trust Co. 1450 Gulf to Bay Boulevard Sign Maintenance/Abandoned Signs/Non-Conforming Signs/Parking Lot Surfaces – Weaver 4.14 Case 06-12 Affidavit of Non-Compliance Dimitrios Kapetanopoulos 705 Court Street Exterior Surfaces - Schaar Member Schultz moved to accept the Affidavits of Compliance for Cases 27-11, 28-11, 29-11, 30-11, 31-11, 32-11, 33-11, 34-11, 35-11, 36-11, 04-12, 14-12, and 16-12 and to accept the Affidavit of Non-Compliance and issue an Order imposing a fine for Case 06-12. The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously. 5. NEW BUSINESS: None. 6. NUISANCE ABATEMENT LIEN FILINGS Code Enforcement 2011-05-23 9 Tarpon IV LLC PNU2011-02385 910 Nicholson Street 10-29-15-69138-002-0100 $349.20 Tarpon IV LLC PNU2011-02386 1304 N Madison Avenue 10-29-15-26892-007-0110 $378.13 Anne M. King PNU2011-02384 908 Nicholson Street 10-29-15-69138-002-0110 $349.20 Barbara Klein & Roberta Keim PNU2011-02188 1014 Pinebrook Drive 10-29-15-69048-004-0090 $402.19 Member Schultz moved to accept the Nuisance Abatement Lien filings. The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously. 7. ADJOURN: i The meeting adjourned at 2:35 p.m. //ii ,i L i, - y Attest: Chair ,......-1(.000F C/; unicipal Code Enforcement :oard JA . 1. 1 t Ji/i�% % ::, ` ..--'cretary for the Bard II ►iw . Code Enforcement 2011-05-23 10 lui FORM 8B MEMORANDUM OF VOTING CONFLICT FOR COUNTY, MUNICIPAL, AND OTHER LOCAL PUBLIC OFFICERS LAA4 NAME-FIRST NAME-MIDDLE NAME . NAME OF BOARD,COUNCIL,COMMISSION'AUTHORITY,OR COMMITTEE �. CC 20;,;/&5 t Il t C i I e d ( if t'rifeertxe - e l MAILING ADD794 S /�` � /4 j�e/ 5/�( 3// THE BOARD, OIS A UNIT COMMISSION,AUTHORITY OR COMMITTEE ON pi. WHICH I SERVE IS A UNIT OF: CIT COU TY 1LCITY ❑COUNTY ❑OTHER LOCAL AGENCY I it tU 8 1 �� �� NAME OF POLITICALL SUBDIVISION: DATE ON WHICH VOTE OCCURRED TT 11 P ITIO Imo" /23' MY POSITION IS: S L ❑ ELECTIVE _A APPOINTIVE WHO MUST FILE FORM 8B This form is for use by any person serving at the county, city,or other local level of government on an appointed or elected board, council, commission, authority, or committee. It applies equally to members of advisory and non-advisory bodies who are presented with a voting conflict of interest under Section 112.3143, Florida Statutes. Your responsibilities under the law when faced with voting on a measure in which you have a conflict of interest will vary greatly depending on whether you hold an elective or appointive position. For this reason, please pay close attention to the instructions on this form before completing the reverse side and filing the form. INSTRUCTIONS FOR COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 112.3143, FLORIDA STATUTES A person holding elective or appointive county, municipal, or other local public office MUST ABSTAIN from voting on a measure which inures to his or her special private gain or loss. Each elected or appointed local officer also is prohibited from knowingly voting on a mea- sure which inures to the special gain or loss of a principal (other than a government agency)by whom he or she is retained(including the parent organization or subsidiary of a corporate principal by which he or she is retained);to the special private gain or loss of a relative; or to the special private gain or loss of a business associate. Commissioners of community redevelopment agencies under Sec. 163.356 or 163.357, F.S.,and officers of independent special tax districts elected on a one-acre, one-vote basis are not prohibited from voting in that capacity. For purposes of this law, a "relative" includes only the officer's father, mother, son, daughter, husband, wife, brother, sister, father-in-law, mother-in-law, son-in-law, and daughter-in-law. A"business associate" means any person or entity engaged in or carrying on a business enterprise with the officer as a partner,joint venturer, coowner of property, or corporate shareholder(where the shares of the corporation are not listed on any national or regional stock exchange). ELECTED OFFICERS: In addition to abstaining from voting in the situations described above,you must disclose the conflict: PRIOR TO THE VOTE BEING TAKEN by publicly stating to the assembly the nature of your interest in the measure on which you are abstaining from voting;and WITHIN 15 DAYS AFTER THE VOTE OCCURS by completing and filing this form with the person responsible for recording the min- utes of the meeting,who should incorporate the form in the minutes. APPOINTED OFFICERS: Although you must abstain from voting in the situations described above, you otherwise may participate in these matters. However, you must disclose the nature of the conflict before making any attempt to influence the decision,whether orally or in writing and whether made by you or at your direction. IF YOU INTEND TO MAKE ANY ATTEMPT TO INFLUENCE THE DECISION PRIOR TO THE MEETING AT WHICH THE VOTE WILL BE TAKEN: • You must complete and file this form(before making any attempt to influence the decision)with the person responsible for recording the minutes of the meeting,who will incorporate the form in the minutes. (Continued on other side) CE FORM 8B-EFF. 1/2000 PAGE 1 APPOINTED OFFICERS (continued) • A copy of the form must be provided immediately to the other members of the agency. • The form must be read publicly at the next meeting after the form is filed. IF YOU MAKE NO ATTEMPT TO INFLUENCE THE DECISION EXCEPT BY DISCUSSION AT THE MEETING: • You must disclose orally the nature of your conflict in the measure before participating. • You must complete the form and file it within 15 days after the vote occurs with the person responsible for recording the minutes of the meeting,who must incorporate the form in the minutes.A copy of the form must be provided immediately to the other members of the agency,and the form must be read publicly at the next meeting after the form is filed. ii DISCLOSURE OF LOCAL OFFICER'S A INTEREST I, i t GL.&L 1 �,�uT Z�r.-L4-4---) , hereby disclose that on May Z_3 ,20 /y : (a)A measure came or will come before my agency which (check one) inured to my special private gain or loss; /� / �[ n )( inured to the special gain or loss of my business associate, (,OO44/ si t, t t7.44 e P ^ta� �U.r 1�(Am. 0 r inured to the special gain or loss of my relative, �' � �a °��i P�� • inured to the special gain or loss of , by whom I am retained;or inured to the special gain or loss of ,which is the parent organization or subsidiary of a principal which has retained me. (b)The measure before my agency and the nature of my conflicting interest in the measure is as follows: C (4) p/4 tei f +o-rv1 -I S �' Q vte lt-a C AAA,d ll fly'-cam p 7 vl a./re flati ,z,t,t.e Gw.- _f' /s d c-t/ //f Gyp $-&2Vt / 0-5/ 11 //117 Date Filed Signature NOTICE: UNDER PROVISIONS OF FLORIDA STATUTES §112.317, A FAILURE TO MAKE ANY REQUIRED DISCLOSURE CONSTITUTES GROUNDS FOR AND MAY BE PUNISHED BY ONE OR MORE OF THE FOLLOWING: IMPEACHMENT, REMOVAL OR SUSPENSION FROM OFFICE OR EMPLOYMENT, DEMOTION, REDUCTION IN SALARY, REPRIMAND, OR A CIVIL PENALTY NOT TO EXCEED$10,000. CE FORM 8B-EFF. 1/2000 PAGE 2