The URL can be used to link to this page

FLD2008-07021FLD20,-0-8 -07021 1314 S MISSOURI AVE ORIDA PAIN MANAGEMENT ATLAS # 306A ZONING: C LAND USE: CG RECEIVED: 07/02/2008 INCOMPLETE: COMPLETE: MAPS: PHOTOS: STAFF REPORT: DRC: CDB: CLWCoverSheet E °Clearwater U s Planning Department 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, Florida 33756 Telephone: 727 - 562 -4567 Fax: 727 - 562 -4865 ❑ SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION ❑ SUBMIT 14 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION - Plans and application are required to be collated, stapled, and folded into sets ❑ SUBMIT FIRE PRELIMARY SITE PLAN: $200.00 ❑ SUBMIT APPLICATION FEE $ i CASE #: RECEIVED BY (staff initials): 1314 S MISSOURI AVE FLD2008 -07021 FLORIDA PAIN MANAGEMENT Zoning: C atlas# 306A * NOTE: 15 TOTAL SETS OF INFORMATION REQUIRED (APPLICATIONS PLUS SITE PLAN SETS) FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project (Revised 04/24/2007) PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT– APPLICANT, APPLICANT NAME: MAILING ADDRESS: PHONE NUMBER: CELL NUMBER PROPERTY OWNER(S): List ALL owners on the deed AGENT NAME: MAILING ADDRESS: PHONE NUMBER: CELL NUMBER: AGENT INFORMATION: (Code Section b Z. KAZI WASS'AAII PIMP 63 1 —SY TN �_ ZrAlU g Al-09 ?27 -Sys- 381 ___A/1A 934 -0 You*rO M" PA ?AA-1- W - ?39- 51700 rto! 813- g3 .7 -S/ 61 NUMBER: EMAIL: FAX NUMBER: EMAIL: B. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4- 202.A) PROJECT NAME: rLo/uDA PAIv MAMA4CMEAT PROJECT VALUATION: $ STREET ADDRESS ?/ Y 3'o la/ N 4 ly ISSou2I AYEW U'SI QkWATU2L I Fl d PARCEL NUMBER(S): ZZ/2 -!5/ 97 OOS/DI %O PARCEL SIZE (acres): A �� C/Ztl s PARCEL SIZE (square feet): LEGAL DESCRIPTION: -0,FF ATrAGNED &HI21 T to l PROPOSED USE(S): DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST: S e_f_A_ -A cy 610 9)9)e1 al I" Specifically identify the request (include number of units or square footage of non - residential use and all requested code deviations; e.g. reduction in required number of parking spaces, specific use, etc.) C: \Documents and Settinas\ derek .ferouson \DesktoD\Dlanninaforms 0707\Comarehensive Infill Page 1 of 8 OR* IM R 0 DOES THIS APPLICATION INVOLVE THE TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS (TDR), A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED PLANNED UNI DEVELOPMENT, OR A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED (CERTIFIED) SITE PLAN? YES _ NO �L (if yes, attach a copy of the applicable documents) C. PROOF OF OWNERSHIP: (Code Section 4- 202.A.5) ❑ SUBMIT A COPY OF THE TITLE INSURANCE POLICY, DEED TO THE PROPERTY OR SIGN AFFIDAVIT ATTESTING OWNERSHIP (see page 7) D. ❑ 1. WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 3- 913.A) Provide complete responses to the six (6) GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA— Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail: The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent.properties in which it is located. SEF i5gHIN �� -I' ATIAGNED 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. —SLOE fiKJ�'11�-�' A�G_N_ED 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use. 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. 5EE Ex��il�rr �� 1 'Fl-rl_,�c -rEb 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. SSE wir' 4 ' AVACHE V 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts, on adjacent properties. SEE EKHI(d l T �/J� ��Q_(��C•}} �D Itv ! AL - -- RECE! ED (1 2 2008 C:\Documents and Settings\derek.ferguson\ Desktop\ planningforms _0707\Comprehensive Inleroyek(1 Ld?e)4-0�Zyd Page 2 of 8 WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project Criteria) ❑ Provide complete responses to the six (6) COMPREHENSIVE INFILL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT CRITERIA —Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail: 1. The development or redevelopment is otherwise impractical without deviations from the use and /or development standards set forth in this zoning district. _S�g ,�ICN /B /T D -2' �I_77RCtf�b 2. The development or redevelopment will be consistent with the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan, as well as with the general purpose, intent and basic planning objectives of this Code, and with the intent and purpose of this zoning district L__Jly 3. The development or redevelopment will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of surrounding properties. se& ,EX/T 'V=ZA Al 1T A LNB b 4. Adjoining properties will not suffer substantial detriment as a result of the proposed development. 5. The proposed use shall otherwise be permitted by the underlying future land use category, be compatible with adjacent land uses, will not substantially alter the essential use characteristics of the neighborhood; and shall demonstrate compliance with one or more of the following objectives: a. The proposed use is permitted in this zoning district as a minimum standard, flexible standard or flexible development use; b. The proposed use would be a significant economic contributor to the City's economic base by diversifying the local economy or by creating jobs; c. The development proposal accommodates the expansion or redevelopment of an existing economic contributor; d. The proposed use provides for the provision of affordable housing; e. The proposed use provides for development or redevelopment in an area that is characterized by other similar development and where a land use plan amendment and rezoning would result in a spot land use or zoning designation; or f. The proposed use provides for the development of a new and /or preservation of a working waterfront use. S f E f_a1N 17- '19- Z' ,llTl c H940 6. Flexibility with regard to use, lot width, required setbacks, height and off - street parking are justified based on demonstrated compliance with all of the following design objectives: a. The proposed development will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of the surrounding properties for uses permitted in this zoning district; b. The proposed development complies with applicable design guidelines adopted by the City; c. The design, scale and intensity of the proposed development supports the established or emerging character of an area; d. In order to form a cohesive, visually interesting and attractive appearance, the proposed development incorporates a substantial number of the following design elements: ❑ Changes in horizontal building planes; ❑ Use of architectural details such as columns, cornices, stringcourses, pilasters, porticos, balconies, railings, awnings, etc.; ❑ Variety in materials, colors and textures; ❑ Distinctive fenestration patterns; ❑ Building stepbacks; and ❑ Distinctive roofs forms. e. The proposed development provides for appropriate buffers, enhanced landscape design and appropriate distances between buildings. s�E Lrkt / /Brr 'n. Z. - ILACHtb rZ, RXd:.l V" * #0;7 C: \Documents and Settings \derek.ferguson\ Desktop\ planningfonns- 0707\Comprehensive Infill ProjeW(FWY 24-07.doc Page 3 of 0 2 2gU8 7 tR STORMWATER PLAN SUBMITTAL Manual and 4- 202.A.21) • of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteria ❑ A STORMWATER NARRATIVE MUST BE SUBMITTED WITH ALL APPLICATIONS. All applications that involve addition or modification of impervious surface, including buildings, must include a stormwater plan that demonstrates compliance with the City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteria manual. A reduction in impervious surface area does not qualify as an exemption to this requirement. ❑ If a plan is not required, the narrative shall provide an explanation as to why the site is exempt. ❑ At a minimum, the STORMWATER PLAN shall include the following; ❑ Existing topography extending 50 feet beyond all property lines; ❑ Proposed grading including finished floor elevations of all structures; ❑ All adjacent streets and municipal storm systems; ❑ Proposed stormwater detention/retention area including top of bank, toe of slope and outlet control structure; ❑ A narrative describing the proposed stormwater control plan including all calculations and data necessary to demonstrate compliance with the City manual. ❑ Proposed stormwater detention/retention area including top of bank, toe of slope and outlet control structure; ❑ Signature and seal of Florida Registered Professional Engineer on all plans and calculations. El SUBMITTAL OF PERMIT INQUIRY LETTER OR SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT (SWFWMD) PERMIT SUBMITTAL (SWFWMD approval is required prior to issuance of City Building Permit), if applicable ❑ ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF STORMWATER PLAN REQUIREMENTS (Applicant must Initial one of the following): ��o� �Stormwater plan as noted above is included Stormwater plan is not required and explanation narrative is attached. At a minimum, a grading plan and finished floor elevations shall be provided. CAUTION — IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A STORMWATER PLAN AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 562 -4750. F. SUPPLEMENTAL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 4- 202.A) ❑ SIGNED AND SEALED SURVEY (including legal description of property) — One original and 14 copies; ❑ TREE SURVEY (including existing trees on site and within 25' of the adjacent site, by species, size (DBH 4" or greater), and location, including drip lines and indicating trees to be removed) — please design around the existing trees; ❑ TREE INVENTORY; prepared by a "certified arborist", of all trees 4" DBH or greater, reflecting size, canopy (drip lines) and condition of such trees; RiUX, W k( &. ) ❑ LOCATION MAP OF THE PROPERTY; ❑ PARKING DEMAND STUDY in conjunction with a request to make deviations to the parking standards (ie. Reduce number of spaces). Prior to the submittal of this application, the methodology of such study shall be approved by the Community Development Coordinator and shall be in accordance with accepted traffic engineering principles. The findings of the study will be used in determining whether or not deviations to the parking standards are approved; ❑ GRADING PLAN, as applicable; ❑ PRELIMINARY PLAT, as required (Note: Building permits will not be issued until evidence of recording a final plat is provided); ❑ COPY OF RECORDED PLAT, as applicable; C:%Documents and Settings\ derek. ferguson% DesktopWanningforms _0707\Comprehensive Infill Project (FLRT041AAb 1'd c Page 4 of 8 "_ 022008 ON OF G. SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4- 202.A) 13 SITE PLAN with the following information (not to exceed 24"x 361: Index sheet referencing individual sheets included in package; North arrow; Engineering bar scale (minimum scale one inch equals 50 feet), and date prepared; All dimensions; Footprint and size of all EXISTING buildings and structures; Footprint and size of all PROPOSED buildings and structures; All required setbacks; All existing and proposed points of access; C] A required sight triangles; I entification of environmentally unique areas, such as watercourses, wetlands, tree masses, and specimen trees, including description and location of understory, ground cover vegetation and wildlife habitats, etc; Location of all public and private easements; Location of all street rights -of -way within and adjacent to the site; Location of existing public and private utilities, including fire hydrants, storm and sanitary sewer lines, manholes and lift stations, gas and water lines; All parking spaces, driveways, loading areas and vehicular use areas; _ Depiction by shading or crosshatching of all required parking lot interior landscaped areas; Location of all solid waste containers, recycling or trash handling areas and outside mechanical equipment and all required screening {per Section 3- 201(D)(i) and Index #701); Location of all landscape material; Location of all onsite and offsite storm -water management facilities; Location of all outdoor lighting fixtures; and Location of all existing and proposed sidewalks. O SITE DATA TABLE for existing, required, and proposed development, in writtentlabular form: EXISTING REQUIRED PROPOSED Land area in square feet and acres; Number of EXISTING dwelling units; Number of PROPOSED dwelling units; _ Gross floor area devoted to each use; Parking spaces: total number, presented in tabular form with the number of required spaces; Total paved area, including all paved parking spaces & driveways, expressed in square feet & percentage of the paved vehicular area; Official records book and page numbers of all existing utility _ easement; Building and structure heights; Impermeable surface ratio (I.S.R.); and Floor area ratio (F.A.R.) for all nonresidential uses. 13 REDUCED COLOR SITE PLAN to scale (8'/2 X 11); O FOR DEVELOPMENTS OVER ONE ACRE, provide the following additional information on site plan: One -foot contours or spot elevations on site; _ Offsite elevations if required to evaluate the proposed stormwater management for the parcel; All open space areas; Location of all earth or water retaining walls and earth berms; 0I)IA. Lot lines and building lines (dimensioned);: Streets and drives (dimensioned); 22006 Building and structural setbacks (dimensioned); Structural overhangs; 1'.d &r(nqy C7,17V ra,° rte � N CADocuments and Seffinas\ desk_ femusnn\Desktnn %nlanninafnrrns 07n7\Cmmnrehensive Infill Proiect (FLD) 04- 24- 07.doc Page 5 of 8 H. LANDSCAPING PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4- 1102.A) ❑ LANDSCAPE PLAN with the following information (not to exceed 24" x 36 "): All existing and proposed structures; Names of abutting streets; Drainage and retention areas including swales, side slopes and bottom elevations; _ lineation and dimensions of all required perimeter landscape buffers; _ t visibility triangles; Delineation and dimensions of all parking areas including landscaping islands andlcurbb''p' Existing trees on -site and immediately adjacent to the site, by species, size and to ons, including driplines (as indicated on required survey). =Lo Ition, size, and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, indicated by a key relating to the plant _ edule; PI t schedule with a key (symbol or label) indicating the size, description, specifications, quantities, and spacing requirements of all _ existing and proposed landscape materials, including botanical and common names; Typical planting details for trees, palms, shrubs and ground cover plants including instructions, soil mixes, backfilling, mulching and ective measures; Int or landscaping areas hatched and /or shaded and labeled and interior landscape coverage, expressing in both square feet and ercentage covered; Conditions of a previous development approval (e.g. conditions imposed by the Community Development Board); Irrigation notes. ❑ REDUCED COLOR LANDSCAPE PLAN to scale (8' /zX 11); ❑ COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM application, as applicable. Landscape associated with the Comprehensive Landscape Program shall exceed minimum Code requirements to offset the areas where minimum Code will not be met. I. BUILDING ELEVATION PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4- 202.A.23) ❑ BUILDING ELEVATION DRAWINGS — with the following information; All sides of all buildings; Dimensioned; Colors (provide one full sized set of colored elevations); Materials; _ Sight visibility triangles; ❑ REDUCED BUILDING ELEVATIONS — same as above to scale on 8 %: X 11. J. SIGNAGE: (Division 19. SIGNS / Section 3 -1806) ❑ All EXISTING freestanding and attached signs; Provide photographs and dimensions (area, height, etc.), indicate whether they will be removed or to remain. ❑ All PROPOSED freestanding and attached signs; Provide details including location, size, height, colors, materials and drawing; freestanding signs shall include the street address (numerals) ❑ Comprehensive Sign Program application, as applicable (separate application and fee required). ❑ Reduced signage proposal (8'/: X 11) (color), if submitting Comprehensive Sign Program application. RECEIM-) ;? 2 2000 C: \Documents and Settings\derek.ferguson\ Desktop\ planningforms_0707\Comprehensive Infill Projec 0-24--07 Ooc , 4 . A e Page6of r`�rta aT41'14 C171%, OF ! wCarQ`� Chi • i K. TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY: (Section 4- 202.A.13 and 4- 801.C) ❑ Include if required by the Traffic Operations Manager or his/her designee or if the proposed development: ■ Will degrade the acceptable level of service for any roadway as adopted in the Comprehensive Plan. • Will generate 100 or more new vehicle directional trips per hour and /or 1000 or more new vehicle trips per day. • Will affect a nearby roadway segment and /or intersection with five (5) reportable accidents within the prior twelve (12) month period or that is on the City's annual list of most hazardous intersections. Trip generation shall be based on the most recent edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineer's (ITE) Trip General Manual. The Traffic Impact Study must be prepared in accordance with a "Scoping Meeting" held with the Traffic Operations Manager and the Planning Department's Development Review Manager or their designee (727 - 562 -4750) Refer to Section 4 -801 C of the Community Development Code for exceptions to this requirement. LJ Acknowledgement of traffic impact study requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following): Traffic Impact Study is included. The study must include a summary table of pre- and post-development levels of service for all roadway legs and each turning movement at all intersections identified in the Scoping Meeting. - da��raffic Impact Study is not required. CAUTION — IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 562- 4750. L. FIRE FLOW CALCULATIONS/ WATER STUDY: Provide Fire Flow Calculations. Water Study by a FIRE PROTECTION ENGINEER to assure an adequate water supply is available and to determine if any upgrades are required by the developer due to the impact of this project. The water supply must be able to support the needs of any required fire sprinkler, standpipe and /or fire pump. If a fire pump is required the water supply must be able to supply 150% of its rated capacity. Compliance with the 2004 Florida Fire Prevention Code to include NFPA 13, MFPA 14, NFPA 20, NFPA 291, and MFPA 1142 (Annex H) is required. O Acknowledgement of fire flow calculations/water study requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following): Ica rr��,,g : !, ac, l Fire Flow Calculations/Water Study is included. -Fire Flow Calculations/Water Study is not required. , . 0 - 2006 CAUTION — IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR � cFIRE-; FLOW;` &I'l CALCULATIONS/ WATER STUDY AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICA` ir►► ONCMI'S.T: /:BEO -ol . RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Fire Prevention Department at (727) 562 -4334. M. SIGNATURE: 1, the undersigned, acknowledge that all representations made in this application are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge and authorize City representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application. Signa re of property owner or representative STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS Swom to and subscribed before me this Z-~ oday of A.D. 20 O Vs to me and /or by 01-1,Ifi4 A-k 9 who is personally known has produced F�-+7k 4 3't I1-0U9 41`4 as identification. C—"-, Notary public, CI My commission expire �a— 2O� l C: \Documents and Settings\ derek. ferguson\DesktopXplanningforms _0707\Comprehensive Infill Project (FLD) 04- 24-07.doc Page 7 of 8 E r i • N. AFFIDAVIT TO AUTHORIZE AGENT: 1. Provide names of if property rs on deed- PRINT full names: 2. That (I arntwe are) the owner(s) and record title holders) of the following described property (addressor general location): ...1 IL� s .� 151 —.. 3:. That this property constitutes tha property for which a request for a: (describe request) USE n MAPICAL USE 4. That the undersigned (hasMave) appointed and (do-Wdo) appoint: _ul-L- al A, PF _#48tj .0 THeAS �R IXI'VAL ., _thrEnT�1�Et.�l.o as (his/thelo agents) to execute any petitions or other documents necessary to affect such. petition; b. That this affidavit has been executed to induce the City of Clearwater, Florida to consider and ad on the above described property; e. That alte,visits to the property are necessary by City representatives. In order to process this application and the owner authorizes City representatives to vM and photograph the property described In this application; 7. Thit (Uwe), the undersigned authority, hereby certify that the foregoing Is true a correct. Property Owner _Propartjr Owner -- Pro"'Oomer -- -- Property Owner - - STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS. // 1 Before me the undersigned, an officer duly commissioned, by the laws of the State of Florida, on this �lD day of 00� personally W appeared s_"� al Cr/,D who laving been fret duly swom Deposes and says that helshe fully understands-the contents of the affidavit that he/she signed. Notary Public Signature My- Commission Expires: // - Y_ U 0:1Docrmtents and Souftsldemtfergusonoesktopllllannkabr n . 0707%Comprehenstve Info Projed (FlD) 04- 24.07.doc Page 8 of 8. E EXHIBIT A LEGAL DESCRITION i A PARCEL OF LAND LOCATED IN SECTION 22, TOWNSHIP 29 SOUTH, RANGE 15 EAST, PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA. BLOCK 'E', LOTS 17 THROUGH 24, AND BLOCK 3, LOT 24, AND THE EAST 1/2 OF THE VACATED RIGHT OF WAY OF SOUTH STREET; ALL OF THE PLAT OF "LAKEVIEW HEIGHTS ", AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 13, PAGE 5, IN THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA. ALL OF THE ABOVE LESS THE EAST 10 FEET FOR RIGHT OF WAY FOR SOUTH MISSOURI AVENUE. ExHiBiT B DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST This project requests a change of use for the property located at 1314 South Missouri Avenue, Clearwater, from retail use to medical use. The existing building and parking lot do not meet the Minimum Development Standards for the Commercial District `C' as described within the City of Clearwater Community Development Code. We request to retain the existing building (with modifications), retain the majority of the parking lot located on the southerly portion of the site and redevelop the northerly portion of the site into additional parking and a stormwater retention pond. The building is currently encroaching on the standard building setbacks at the rear, front and north side. To reduce the impact of the building within the standard front setback we propose to remove the existing overhanging canopy and remove the mansard roof that overhangs the front covered entry. The building will have an 18' front set back and the covered entry will have a 9' -8" front setback. All of the pervious surfaces will be removed from between the building and right -of -way from the covered entry northward to provide a landscape buffer. The rear of the building will remain unchanged with a 4.4' rear setback & landscape buffer. To enhance the screening of the rear of the building from the adjoining properties to the west a 6 feet high wood privacy fence will be constructed. The northerly portion of the existing building will be demolished to provide the required additional onsite parking spaces. Removing the northerly portion of the building makes it compliant with the side setback requirement. The parking area on the southerly portion of the property will remain primarily intact. The current configuration of the existing parking lot will not have the required amount of interior landscaping. To add interior landscaping space we propose to remove the pervious surfaces from the existing islands, remove the sidewalk along the building and remove the pavement between the entry and exit drive aisles. The sidewalk running parallel to the front face of the building at the southeast corner will be shifted toward the Missouri Avenue to provide a continuous planting bed adjacent to the building (the affected diagonal parking spaces will be re- striped as parallel spaces). The southerly landscape buffer will remain approximately 3 feet wide and the westerly landscape buffer will remain approximately 2 feet wide. To provide an increased buffing effect a 6 feet high masonry wall will be constructed between the parking area and the properties to the west. No landscaping buffer will be provided between the parallel parking spaces and the right of way. I • r EXHIBIT D -1 WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA 1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. The development includes the reuse of an existing structure within a well - established commercial district. The adjoining commercial buildings are of similar height, character and position to the street but do not have the street front coverage of the structure on our site. The proposed development will increase the harmony of the adjacent properties by reducing the overall bulk and street front coverage of the building located on this site. The reduction in the size of the building will also lessen the visual impact on the residential neighbors to the west. 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. The proposed development will have no effect on the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings. The proposed development will correct and/or mitigate zoning nonconformities on this site. The change of use should make this development more harmonious with its surroundings. The medical clinic will not operate during evening hours as a retail establishment does reducing activity and noise adjacent to residential uses. The loading dock will be removed which will eliminate large delivery trucks from the property. The construction of the privacy fences and walls will create better buffers between the commercial property and the residential properties on the west. The proposed stormwater retention pond and stormwater management system will divert stormwater runoff away from neighboring lands. The drastically enhanced landscaping program is good for the esthetics of the neighborhood and the environment. All these improvements should be beneficial to the value of adjacent properties. 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use. The proposed development should enhance the health and safety persons residing and working in the neighborhood. The medical clinic will provide health services to the neighborhood and the City of Clearwater in general. The elimination of large delivery trucks maneuvering in and out of the site will enhance motor vehicle and pedestrian traffic in the area. 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. The proposed development minimizes traffic congestion by creating limited vehicle ingress and egress points. The existing condition has unmarked parking spaces that require users and delivery trucks to back onto Missouri Avenue. 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. The, building on the project site is part of the c�ormmiinity character in itc 5imil2ritie,c of crale, and site position to the other surrounding buildings. The proposed project will continue to operate as a rnmmF+rrial hncinncc in tha ciirrnnndino m;v, -d nec- rnmmare;n1 d;ctrirt f9 t 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts, on adjacent properties. The proposed project design minimizes adverse effects visually by enhancing the fagade of the building and reducing its mass and creating more green spaces, acoustically by providing walls, fences and landscaping buffers between our site and our neighbors, olfactory by eliminating large diesel delivery trucks from the site, operationally by eliminating evening retail operations, and adjacently by reducing stormwater runoff impacts on our neighbors. 0 EXHIBIT D -2 WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS COMPREHENSIVE INFILL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT CRITERIA 1. The development or redevelopment is otherwise impractical without deviations from the use and/or development standards set forth in this zoning district. The existing building would have to be demolished to conform to current development standards. Because of the unusual shape of the project site and the location of the building on the site the existing parking spaces need to be retained. Reconfiguring the parking would make it impossible to meet the current parking requirements and preserve a majority of the structure. 2. The development or redevelopment will be consistent with the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan, as well as with the general purpose, intent and basic planning objectives of this Code, and with the intent and purpose of this zoning district. The proposed development plan is consistent with the goals of the Comprehensive Plan and this Zoning District in that it continues the use of the site with an allowed use. The proposed plan complies with the intent and basic planning objectives by complying explicitly with the code where practical and by modifying the existing conditions to as closely resemble code objective where possible. 3. The development or redevelopment will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of surrounding properties. The redevelopment is complimentary in use, scale and character to existing surrounding development and is contained in its operation to the site; therefore it will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvements of surrounding properties. 4. Adjoining properties will not suffer substantial detriment as a result of the proposed development. Adjoining properties will benefit from the proposed development by a reduction in large delivery truck activity, a reduction in stormwater runoff, a reduction in the scale of he building, the enhancement of green space and landscaping, and the reduction of evening business hours. S. The proposed use shall otherwise be permitted by the underlying future land use category, be compatible with adjacent land uses, will not substantially alter the essential use characteristics of the neighborhood; and shall demonstrate compliance with one or more of the following objectives: a. The proposed use is permitted in this zoning district as a minimum standard, flexible standard or flexible development use; b. The proposed use would be a significant economic contributor to the City's economic base by diversifying the local economy or by creating jobs; c. The development proposal accommodates the expansion or redevelopment of an existing economic contributor; d. The proposed use provides for the provision of affordable housing; e. The proposed use provides for development or redevelopment in an area that is characterized by other similar development and where a land use plan amendment and rezoning would result in a -snot land » -se or zoning designation; or f. The proposed use provides for the development of a new and/or preservation of a working xx7AtP r not imp 0 0 The proposed use is permitted under the Future Land Use Category. This project will diversify the City's economic base by providing specialized medical job opportunities and will accommodate the redevelopment of an existing economic contributor. 6. Flexibility with regard to use, lot width, required setbacks, height and off - street parking are justified based on demonstrated compliance with all of the following design objectives: a. The proposed development will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of the surrounding properties for uses permitted in this zoning district; See item 3 above. b. The proposed development complies with applicable design guidelines adopted by the City; The proposed development was designed in accordance with applicable design guidelines and with consideration of input from City staff during the BPRC meeting and subsequent conversations. c. The design, scale and intensity of the proposed development supports the established or emerging character of an area; The design, scale and intensity of the proposed development supports established character because it is similar to the existing fabric of the surrounding commercial district and emerging character by enhancing he landscaping and green space on the property and by creating a modern exterior facade. d. In order to form a cohesive, visually interesting and attractive appearance, the proposed development incorporates a substantial number of the following design elements: • Changes in horizontal. building planes The proposed elevation provides a variety of horizontal building planes. • Use of architectural details such as columns, cornices, stringcourses,, pilasters, porticos, balconies, railings, awnings, etc.; The proposed building elevations incorporate columns, cornices, pitched tiled accent roofs, and awnings • Variety in materials, colors and textures; The proposed building elevations incorporate a variety of materials and trim color. • Distinctive fenestration patterns; The proposed building elevations demonstrate distinctive fenestration in the use of new windows and column arrangements. • Building setbacks; and A variety of design elements have been introduced the building to break up the expanse of the front facade and create of a variety of depths on the facade 0 • Distinctive roof forms. This project is distinctive in the design in that the elevations incorporate signature elements and forms identifiable with Florida Pain Management. e. The proposed development provides for appropriate buffers, enhanced landscape design and appropriate distances between buildings. The proposed development provides substantially enhanced buffers and landscape design. The reduction in the size of the building provides greater distances between buildings which is more compatible with the adjoining residential properties. i °(Clearwater 0 Planning Departmeni 100 South Myrtle Avem Clearwater, Florida 337 Telephone: 727 - 562-45 Fax: 727- 562 -4865 ❑ SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION ❑ SUBMIT 14 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION - Plans and application are required to be collated, stapled and folded into sets 1314 S MISSOURI AVE FL ®2008 -07021 FLORIDA PAIN MANAGEMENT Zoning: C atlas# 306A * NOTE: A TOTAL OF 15 SETS OF THIS APPLICATION AND ALL SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION IS REQUIRED TO BE SUBMITTED IN CONJUNCTION WITH A COMPLETE LEVEL ONE OR LEVEL TWO APPLICATION. COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM (Revised 04/24/2007) PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT— APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4- 202.A) APPLICANT NAME: _ Q[L KAS/ NASSAN,J'JzES_ l NT;j�4pR—PA.IN / - MAILING ADDRESS: Sy W AvENUB No/t -TKO ST)'E7fltSBvR,G11� FJa2/AA PHONE NUMBER: '7Z7- jW- 7?1/ FAX NUMBER: ?27• SYt - CELL NUMBER: /`/� EMAIL: �, 4-0—* k ?31a PROPERTYOWNER(S): _!%JALD �. —l� RX15*0A) l��JV1'i a'faa4isr C. KAA List ALL owners on the deed AGENT NAME: j,D64, oeatNhAt7 P&AICi� 7 MAILING ADDRESS: !/ qO $AU-r(4 AAAIVRA'GAN_IV ,t►U_W4_T_R_ ij.P_i PHONE NUMBER: fa - 839 " $QOO K /OI FAX NUMBER: CELL NUMBER: /,T,��.5 /i% EMAIL: 1. ARCHITECTURAL THEME: OUP GoM a. The landscaping in a Comprehensive Landscape Program shall be designed as a part of the architectural theme of the principal buildings proposed or developed on the parcel proposed for the development. �S_ife ATJAcrJ ,eo OR b. The design, character, location and /or materials of the landscape treatment proposed in the Comprehensive Landscape Program shall be demonstrably more attractive than landscaping otherwise permitted on the parcel proposed for development under the minimum landscape standards. SEE 5Xt -IJ6'I7' `C' 81TA (-H9V CA)ocuments and Settings% den k.ferguson%DesktopWianningfofms 0707%Compfohensive Landscape Program 04- 2"7.doc Page 1 of 2 ,y 2 2008 PMNp €'. I, e�.tk,ua Yfel� 2. COMMUNITY CHARACTER: The landscape treatment proposed in the Comprehensive Landscape Program will enhance the community character of the City of Clearwater. 3. PROPERTY VALUES: The landscape treatment proposed in the Comprehensive Landscape Program will have a beneficial impact on the value of the property in the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. 5-9,E 9,YK 16/7 �'G r AITAG KAU 4. SPECIAL AREA OR SCENIC CORRIDOR PLAN: The landscape treatment proposed in the Comprehensive Landscape Program is consistent with any special area or scenic corridor plan which the City of Clearwater has prepared and adopted for the area in which the parcel proposed for development is located. $'6t 9)eH I IT V ATrAS�r19D THE LANDSCAPING REQUIREMENTS OF ARTICLE 3, DIVISION 12 MAY BE WAIVED OR MODIFIED AS A PART OF A LEVEL ONE OR LEVEL TWO APPLICATION, AS THE CASE MAY BE, IF THE APPLICATION FOR DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL INCLUDES A COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM, WHICH SATISFIES THE ABOVE CRITERIA. THE USE OF LANDSCAPE PLANS, SECTIONS / ELEVATIONS, RENDERINGS AND PERSPECTIVES MAY BE NECESSARY TO SUPPLEMENT THE INFORMATION PROVIDED ON THIS WORKSHEET. SIGNATURE: 1, the undersigned, acknowledge that all representations made in STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS this application are true and accurate to the best of my Sworn to and subscribed before me this Z- " C) day of knowledge and authorize City representatives to visit and `Su L� , A.D. 20 O'er to me and/or by photograph the property described in this application. -L)=LU5U A-L0Qr1 who is personally known has produced Fc AL A-q' Jb r-11-0 t.P-j N � as identification. 91gnatu of property caner or representative Notary public, My commissio expires: yvvA4`4 1--c S 4 09 too, E?tMED C:1Documents and Settingsiderek .fergusonlDesktoplplanningfom►s 070AComprehensive Landscape Program 04- 24-07.doc Page 2 of 2 . ^ f1 2 t1 2008 � C tl.�e�0r•Eu �Y•r,.�.r .,� a EXHIBIT C COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM 1. Architectural theme: The landscape design, character, location and materials are demonstrably more attractive that landscaping otherwise permitted by the minimum landscape standards. There are more trees and shrubs, of larger size than minimum requirements. The landscape program features many native and flowering plants with a unified design theme. 2. Community Character: The opening up of this site to extensive planting along South Missouri Avenue will enhance the community character by contributing to the attractive landscaped throughways within the city and by expanding the green environment. 3. Property Values: The redevelopment and landscaping of this site will have a beneficial impact on the properties within the immediate vicinity of the project by providing a more open and attractive environment and by creating planted buffers between adjacent properties. 4. Special area or scenic corridor plan: This project will contribute to the landscaped treatment of a primary corridor roadway within the community. 0 2 2008 lair• N ?7wld. rl�Y1AI7TT t�/G►J��(� /'- TUT1l/W X w..... .... rs e...c• -- - -•—• ' tZ.. �s�►T l..aNe -[rw A•mr./4.e %nne� lw.nwid,N d - - -: ools4 - - r tl._g�8F53,� .. . -� - �t �tt�tt � .JIlrade thin 17th dab of Docoln ,q, j), 1g 56 BetWeen GEORGE C... HARR I SON_and_IIELEH- HARR.1 SON_a I so__known.___ as HELEN M. HARRISON,- his .wife, of the .city of C191arwater, . -- - - --- -- -- of•the-Cdunt71'of ' '"f� -iris l -i Qa __._.- _. -..._. _..._.anal- State.aj""_F'I "o`r'i d`a'-- -- '-...� part iee of the flret part, and GEORGE C. HARRISON REAL'T'Y CO. Box 566 Ca ,n r,,ater, Fla. - -' -,I_�r corporation existing under the •laton of the State of F I or ; d having its p-xincipai.place of business in the County of Pine I I•as and State o F.lorid-a __. f �- - - - - -- party of the second part, _ . _ • _.. _,._.... -_—__WitneaRet 'that the said arL ia the pet art. - h, p f ti p for and 'n considerat'on of the sure of Sov ©nty -f i we Thousand and no (00 Do I I. are_ �$75,coo.00� �rurr.aexs, vur�uar.crs, svla., a.terlea,: re»Wecs, •reteasea,-enleouea,_eonveyed ana.con- firmed• and by theee presents do front, bargain '. sell, alien, remise, release, enfeofJ", convey and eonfi.rm, unto the said party of the second. part and its eucces- sors- and assigne forever, all that certain pdreel of land lying and beinLt in the - - - CaurFtlj of- -Pine I I as and State q- FZorida; more pnrticaTaZy - - - described as, follows: Lots seventeen (17); eighteen (18) ni•neteen (19), twenty (20), and twenty -one t2l), loss 1, r� . 1, r the East ten feet- (Elo,, of" said lots in cording'to map or plat thereof as'recorded in o• plat. book-13, page 5, of the public records of Pinellas County, - -Florida, Subject to -a mortgage to the Pi lot 'L i fc_ I nsur- °'� once Company a. cop orat ion.'exist'in 1 P S', p g .under the Iawa of tho state. of Forth -Carol ilia, dated - _ - `• sand and no / Navcm6cr`•23-- 1`956�-i "n�tho ariiourit - o:fF_rftY- -- Thou - -- - c { °Q- y'�_• 100 Dollars ($50,000.00) arid, • Further subject to a lease between the .gran { ° tors and the Harr ison Furniture Company, a j 1 corporation organized and 'incorporated under the laws of. the state of Florida, with its Princ -ipal' "place- of- birsiricss at C'leai� water, Ijj -P.i ne I I as County, E Lori da, dated Clio I Sth ..day. I of play, _. : ugether with. all the .tenern.en -to. Xeredilaments and appa.rt.ellnlice.a, rr•i.t.h every privileFc;-rtght, title, interest and-estate, dower and right bf doulcr, reverxii:rr, re»loinder.urtd ease»aent thereto belonging or in anyztise appertainin,tf,- tFo Have and to Hold the same in fee ein:.ple fZrcr•er_ -- r 1nd---the said part ieso/ the first part' do covenarit with the said party of the second p � t tat. sire lawfully seised of. the saifl premises, that.tl {cyrnrr! free uj all/ir ft:yrarance, and that they have good rr0h.t acrd - laroflrl. cruth�rity �to_sell�tl +e as »:e;. and tlrai acid p_art_i.c_9.oft�t.e_flr_st part doth_Iler_eEy_fu1111_rcurralr.L the title trisnsnirZ- la`►;Ei and will defend the sate against. tile lawful clairlr.r of 611 per9ons whomsocver. In WVitness Whereof, the said parties of the first part Lave lresreun-to set the i r hanak and seals the day rand year abotrc' written. Signed, $ended and Delivered is Our Prevcnce eat 4S PAu Sts;t� o� F16rida, ' CO—V .or P i no 1 [ ae -`l;- HEREBY CERTIFY. That on t.h£a� 17th -_ da o Decemb "or __. - - - - -- •• --- d. D. I$6 be ore me b f ' / peraorsall� appeared GEORGE- C..__F1ARR -1 -SON -- and-' • - - -• - --- - - -- -- EN- 11ARR:1 50N; a (no known ae _HELEN M- ._JiARR.I.SON., -his __wife ,• o me knauin" = "to - -bo- "the p-- e- reons described in and whd executed thc_ foregoinLi_. _.-- - _GEORGE C_ HARR-1-SON ..REALTY__ CO- . - - - - -- the c l". m nt ned. of to be the i r free act and deed- for the uses and purposes s tFaarelrs mentioned. - W4TNF�_<i_rr: aY ►salure-arid-o�2cial'scuZ at. tha city of C toerwates;, the County ore of Pine I r as and State of Florida, the .day and in year last. aforesaid. NetvN Public, SN&w M Fiwido al iur00 .. _.._. ., My-c mitulon- ewpir",Moy_.,114, _1960 _.. .._ et _.�•� -_s,� - - -,��r_:r. -x:_._ _ Ev CRS._'.. m e M f M a Cn- - IMAM (� M tag �r T\ • !Y V WWI `a � �. •,z S v% v c-. o� �... z rhea. wusairts sr peg �y�y ` rureaw�cx <.. .�. .._.....<. VC�V 7 A T ,�t�. J= sn:Panan�- k.�.di 251 fial-1.3 SO t tti�ttt� Made this dal/ of January Bet' een YhLTSR J. R%iINEL 6RD and AMU H. EXINHARD, his wife, of the County Pinellss and State of Florida parties of the of part, and GFORGS C. HARRISON RICA%TY CO?WANY, a corporation exiatint under the Laws of the State of Flbri.da ; having its prsncivai place of business in the County of Pinellas amd State o Flox -f da r of the second part; Whoae pa�iling address �v 330 So.Miaaouri, Clearwaterr,Flso itnesseth' that the said parties of the .first part, for and in consideration of the =urn of --- ----- ..._ti -... - -TEti DOL.r.xn --------------------------- to them in hand paid, the receipt whereof -is hereby acknoxdsedged, ha ve gra7tted, bargained, told, aliened, remised, released, enfeojfed, conveyed and eon - jtrmed and by these presents do grant, bargains, sell, alien, remise, release, enf11V convey and confirm unto the said party of the second part and its sucees- aors and assigns forteuer, a4l that eertaim parcel of land Lying and beinf in the County of Pinellas and State of Florida, more particuJO? i/ described as foUows. Lots Twenty -Two (22), irenty -Three (23) and t `- • Twenty -Four (24), Block -8 -, LAMYISY HEIGHTS, secording to the map or.plat thereof as re- r� corded in Plat Book -13, -Page 5,• of the Pub11O Records of FlInellaa County, Florida. I t /Rif >..\ -A 1 �iI<lf•�+ .PI <)ft[E ^. \ t.... f -'Z..` - r...•:.1. � ... -,, i�o-;� may; L.g t,[LV UtI ,wNS•iTn�a :] P. •.. .. - y2L 3( () T ,? -30t1 .53.00 - IEF To -ether with alt the tenements, hereditamesats and appurtenances, with every PATLQege, right, title, inWest and estate, dower and right of d6wer, reversion, remainder and easement thereto beZonfirsts or in an;z=ise appartainsn h g: To Have and - to Hold the same ins fee simple forever. .Ind the said part ie sof the first part do covenant with the said party of the .second part that they are Lawfully seized of the said premises, that they are free of all incumbrance, and that • they have food ri¢ht and Lawful authority to sell the same; and that said part lea of the )Zrst part loth .hereby fwUy utarrtaast the - title to said land, and :viii defend the game againat the AP—PwJ CUd,,zs of aR: perroris whomsoever. ' In Witness • Whereofs the, *aid parties of the *It part hisve hefeuato set their hared aand scats the day and year a=bove rvritte:n- SigEed, Seated &ad D uVered is Oar Presmee i 0 e . . State of FIfDI'Ed O.R. County of I EUKREBY UUMEFY, That an thae 9 dap mf Jranaana l A': D. ISM, before rme person.aUy appeared VALTRR J. REINEARD and ANNA. H. RRINRARD, hia vice, to me known to be tke person adescribed in and who executed the forejoinj _.sonveganice to _ GSORGE .C. HAJUUSOH_ RFAY.TY COMPANY and severally aeknowledjed the execution thereof to be their- free act 'and deed. for the uses and purposes' therein mentioned. . WITNESS my sifnatu•re and offLeiai seal at Clea"ater in the county of Pirnellas and State of FEorsda, the dap and year Zast rsloreaaid. day C'om musinn E.cpires - -- - vtczr�y Public '4"'y P.6rlC- SLUM pf Fto.t¢a .#'y c•o.• -Mft sian expires fs 22, 1958 by /timari¢an Surctr C.. of M Y. J •^ Al ;j IM5 nCz m� O �. �•. O � R„ i p„ 1 o ` m o c« !^d O A w o 1 } O z, I, n C t ^' m z C O A w o 1 } O z, I, i 0 s.-.. r:s r-Lu 4rnsLy,xT'{ nm. fi: /Qfi:i,�'.�! ••r:s•.•"Y ♦ i� 2994 e .1rade this 16th day of January .f. D. 1469 t i BCt%Vk'C11 ORIN S- YARBROUGH, joined by his wife. )Lu BzE , R. s YA RB ROUGH l Of the County of Pinellas and State of Florida j 33 p+srt =ea of the frrrt POW, and GEORGE C. HARRISON Rr -kLTY CO.. 1627 Golfview Road. Belleau. Clearwater, Florida 33516 a corpora rzislingf urrcler the laws of the State of Florida harirtd its prin.•iprl place- of bssi►zess in the County of Pinellas and State cif Florida party of the second part, i _ NN'"RIC-17SCOX, thUt CA s,i3 part ies of the first part, for and in consideration i of the. sun: of other good and valuable corslaeraticn and 'Ten--Dollars. to the s in hand paid. the receipt w-herenj is hereby acknou•lexdged, have gr.,nte.l, b sold, uliened, remised, released, enfeo,ied, eonveytd' and core - fIr„o7-J and by'-ihcse presesr- is -do �raat; bar ai>s, -sell, alien,— >enaist; retcosc - -`- n enfco.T. eornvcy and co,.lrm unto the said parts, aj the second part and its suecer- sors end assigns fsrerer, all that certain parcel of land lying and being in the County ev Pinellas and State of 17orida, more particulariy •lescri yed as follows: Lot 24. LESS the East 20 feet thereof, Block `J -. LAKE vlzw HEIGHTS, according to the rap or plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book' 13, page S. Public Records of Pinellas County. j Flox1aa. j Subject to taxes for 1969. a { _t• —` z L._^ r•_,r�•rf - ST/ATS n— P- ©R1 i _•- ,. { {gfff',, ` > FLORIDA St.J. Thy' - OQCU HiEtS7ARY - za -y, S TA AIP=$ A 00-5 51 _ r.' } � 0 0. 3 0 1 i { �S a 1 i i J- Wilder a'� �rn C� y TO ' 'ether with all the tcnerrir7zts,, hereditaments and appurtenances, rrith ctery przzilc1e, right, title, interest and estate, doxcer and right of dower, reversion, rcnzaindcr and casernent thereto belonging or in anywise appertaining_ TO Have and tee Hold the same in fee simple forever. .Ind the said pares of the first part do cotenant uith the said party of Lhv second part that they are lawfully scized of the said premises, that they are free of art i:.eum8rance, and that they have good right and Iazefa.l authority to sell the sarrze; and that said parties of the Just part doth hereby fully warrant the title to said land, and will defend the same against the lawful claimr of all person s whot>msoever. ZW1tSAt:.58 NX-- hereof. the said parties of the first part ho ve hereunto set their hand and scats the day and year abor-e written. Cigne -d, Sealed said 1Delivvrr-d is Our r'rze eez .. .. f State "f Florida, � �vj�� - ^_• �y� Conway oP PINELI-kS I i3 IM E1 CERXIFY. That on this 16th day of Janumry { _1. tl. 19 696 before nse personolly appeared OR:KN S_ YARBROUGH and 1 YaBEY.. R. YARBROUGH. his wife, to me t,nou-n to be the personadescribed an and who executed the forefoin. f Conveyance to GF.ORaE C. FIARRISON Rzpj,.rY CO_ I and severally acknautedfed the execution thereof to be their free act and deed for the uses and purposes therein mentioned_ wl,r FSS my signature and njjicial seat of Clearwater, in the Cvunly of Pinellas as:d State of P70rida, the day and year last aforesaid. .Ifj f- wn�iirccinn F.•s)•ir.•s. _ _1 i.furxj ]'rtbl- ... 1 i ' ear 9 C C) �i ■j. C C] 47 0 za ri rn •� �9 a oo a i O Cl _ _ z p •rss n v� H • z 4 O 71693563 429 AES0L'C!T•1:0M_ _ No. 71 - 92 ' vS'IiIrREAS, it -'ba.s been_ requester) by'George C: 7-Ia.ricison Rl. ty' Company aad'rratxic Scli-anwissaer. tit- owner j3f ctrta.in rsa.I -pr opeity - in t ixkc View Heights, in :tl:e City c9 Clearvc„ . Florida-, that the City _ ' - cf Clear- ccatek. Fidrida. 9aczte_a certain portion of dedicated right of wag _ ' knOWn a.s Snu ;#a .5areet; and _ - -- W.I•VtREEL'6', 'said rigb£ of w y ii_ -nat xLecessary nor_rcq fired and it - - -- -- titexand to b+e is tbe.,�at zirt� LfE'vt�e -Oi[y ard-tlrs $ublic.tbat jtbs same be vfa.cated, NOW, TiiEREFQIIE, BE IT R£S0ltArED 8Y THE CITY � 602;1 3SSION OF -EHX CITY OF CJ_Z� 'iRWATEi:,. FLOELLI)A•. - IN.S- kSSION Dut;x Al4b RMCl3'3UARI:Y fS3�E3s LEi7, 1s3 - FOL:7A g - 5 - -I_ :'l'ba.1 tn'a iollovris.gi = ! • �.• -• -- ' • � - _' • - -- . n_ G Tbat.portieom•aftSOUtFi5trect ('fo.rnie.�ri;r piatt�d as •7.aicciricvr - _ .. 5y Dsipej Iyiiag >etwecn-,F31drks -- Es'-a=A- And Eatst •of the - - a t right of_waT'liae of Miehiga3 Avenuq as almawa on the - ' Snat a8 S alte Yiclw : seH gbfa as rerb3`2ItRI as 'tat $Dale �3y's■.z$e- ^!. of the Public Records - of Pin"las - - . F ' C.ossfy. F'lorsda: a,.� ad e o issoar venue Newt o e es wag as r relocated and_rcc -cr ed tz •0. R. Book 1353. "Page -23. mx3A _ - O-R. floalc 1354,'.:E�Se 377. "ad the•.Fsnblfc'Rec�Yd¢ of Pinellas -- Gauaty. F3orida. be and the game is hBrcbg vacatea', ci`ogad and zeleaicd, and tbe._Gsty. of Clearwater bereby gtvit c-la Siae, and 'rcicancm all of ite right; Titlsand iateI rent'-• -_ - �GScc'pting. that the .- CiSy_o£Igara'atFL?I7g,4iad_s tw.�f1 i° 'i�OZ - - - - - - draiaa.ge and n lity easeniea: IZr'arg te`a feet ;(1Q°) eac2�,eide of the 4;X"j ng _ - K,e of all " ceatezliae of Scrutfi Sire et: fox_ "ti,e ' inatal3atioa and maintena - c - .- � _ �L3'b +a4. - i3tlsiilL" S . .. _... , - ... " •' .. .- - - .- • .. _ • - - 2. Tbat the City Clerlc,ia. hezebg diiectpd to record this Reo,9�nt Rn• . z�a tfie Ihiblic`i�GCOrds•of Pinellas County, .Florida.. _...- --..._. T - _._...., PA_5SED AND AI.IOPTED this 16th'day_bf A- � A.D_ - 9Z1 - - = Mayor -C *49- A tte ..- This. firs rumeni r: a.4 yrep3+_ ed 'by: KERSERr W. F>: J'.: r� �Citj F ttaraV6 City of Clea.waetra. P. i7• Box 4?48 _ Clearwater, Florida `,{�b18 _ .. . - .. _� .e... �: ... ':l.s -. i..4 .> j.� - ,• ttic: •. '. r ..? a •i: i.� :.;�,' - r'N�i�w �, L•+.�� ..,• „"�: ;. �. •_ • j -_— 4 i I� i i I I; I, _f I i �r�w91 �'. A, �m G =;�� t I. S (AeYE TC7 z;r C'ZETi /KATE �N a., aw ,�� ,uwr♦ nanw i a. AYPAoYAL AwaCu.a.rs ,.•an. ,.w +29�••. EDMoND P./GOLE Co. 1 GYi• •xs LMSSCa,[ EMNwIRA• _ Qunwwru FLA. J LAKE VIEW HEIGHTS -SUBDIVISION - CL EARWA TER — FL ORIDA PINELLAS — COUNTY PROPERTY OF O.W.CLAYTON- TRUSTEE • xealYii /✓M L. rJ L. 1, wNa 9 at r.<. xanawas w �c .. nL uJ1 i[ tN ew'AL „L ,.;74 C C S SHE., cl L •/ ,2 A a' ?:Q 3 .{c l l Z 3 3 4. / / Z 3 / L 8 4 • A�� + •5... . �l S L'. f. •• /s, L Li • .I� L L. s s. ../ J S S � �� /S � S •/J t • +iI (, / /b t 7 17 t t t 7 , ,7 7 7 17 . i i 7 // t 7 7, /7t B Ig 8 8 1 18 t 8 8 /L i i g it i B B, , 9 ii 19 S S 9 B B /9 9 9 C /9 i 9 9 D /9 i 1 1 9 i to zi ) 2/ /• Z t /L 2Z i i IL Z )) f /1 IL l / /L 22, / /Z / /3 Z Z9 ( 4 4 B B 13 t Q "iJ la / /° Lai ,E 13 a3 • •_ / Q " Z44 V1E 64' D DAVE / L4 1 "LAKE V 14 i t t 1 14 / / 14 t t 1• 14 Z .Z3 Z3 Z Z . L- �I�TBk 13,5 DES CeJPTION L.�. .. • ,ra h�j wxo a AL l s•JL AMO, b. ~l.ir.a•wa e...+rr ran DrDICAT/o,v �rxa ACKNoWLED"meNT f.oa•ne, AL•.rr.rr km...+V T. na nrrsB!��FV�zs RqC ji 320771 A TEIS . LEASE made thi • 18th day' of flay, A. D., 1cTKfi, Hy AND BLT1dEZR GEORGE C. iiAARISON and REL$N H. HAH"ISON. of '-= Clearwator, Pinellas County, Florida, hereinafter called the, LESSORS, and FiARRISON FURNITURE COMPANY, a corporation orge- raixod and incorporated under the less of the State of Florida, with i to principal place of buaineaA at Clettrxat. r, Pinallsa County, Florida, herein called the LFSSEFA, _ aITHz-SSir'Til, that in consideration of the covenants 'herein centatnad, on the pert a, the saki E,FS%1 -X to be kept and performed, the said LESSORS do horeby leaue to the aeld LFZSKis, the rollovinl, deacvlbed property :t' ts' ooil Located at 1303 - 1b%'Ml:; :.OUti Itl1.M1Ut., ,'Lul,10A, more purtic:a.Inrly doacrlbed -an: - - hots 17" 1 -a',- 19'. �-C anti �1 , .1 Tess ,ttie . ,::.sat ten (1 0)`- rot:t of _,n1d lots;, In Block L or LAYi -V 1 t:i+ HF TGHTS S01401 V i c i IN , CL!-A4 AT K, = L1�T'tA, acrorriing to the -"p or plr<. t theveof as recorded In Plat 'Book 13, pt*v, *• ,, of tteo p.►bllc rveorrin of P:. :....t,5 CC:INTY.. 'I*,,,: ?' iiA . * :'C ati• : t .•i: i 1, C:. t) the not ne for the teyvi or. let yeerm rrc"t :.:tt ir.tt• tne pre mises nre- ready for occupnney, :,npinr: thnrn- for a zt :n squAl to 5'.,• of tho ,giros;_ ennuel :.rsloa of soid 1'0.R?W +AT' tr!th o -tin' -curs ; ay.me.n.t or `:I'4i� TJOL1. ;•1.1j , i.- ' -R (�'),O1s0.00) ;.,t r ' yoter certain, s..t-1 nininum pr,ym -n4 '•e b�- gnS. 1 ,cents of Sc111-:: nj'': .,1: S) r t r i'V. .1.1.c.x1. (.; 7r ?. Jn) Per non t,r, an 0-,n .firm day .of t!ar_!x anti, nrory :rkmzil.h.- d...tr_lrnt stt'tI.._tea: er,._L S th the ftr- t pay-nen t he cc -ai • r dt.e u.ton oc cupttncy of sold pro^:i mom by Tier mli rat.raent between t!:c •nSnlmt&,n pn,vmt -rm e.i '!i. ! `.Itr•. :;i•I :L' yt!nr tend H m urn ria•:wl to "" of i:ht• t;ro: r• annual V - -F lcs of sa. d In to be co•*potcd on a nuar- terty uaaia d.r.- . t -.c t..r-n o:' rsNitl occuntency t.nd ps•onnr• ar1,)utrt munt :,nil 1•rrc salt' L•.: S'.b covnnrent :r ui':.h Ltsc :.tit d LLSS"'12 to n b Aft nc . +„1 t.vS :l , improper or offensive use •of `.•S,c oveml a,�r ; not tv asst--n '..:r.- it•LSa or to :runlet nny part of : aid prnniacr. ultltt..tt the vrltt.en cc:nsent o1' tlte. L.-. :s : +c; re; nos ;.o u:.+e maid prigmtst:a fc•r tiny otnt r pu: -posto turn rya r, wita•r'hou:ar nisi ;tr1.t•ar•onrn, and to qu? t and dtilivr.r ut,. vnid premiat:s ttt. the er,ti �f : oil t�r-n i- an -.cod coed -L`. icn nm they art! now (ordinary wear tird deeny an� d4.zrtvt• by the el omenta only excepted)- Arid tit« v ee i.i LK'SSF. hoz+tp co- tntant: and rip re.en tDsnt if tivirA.It at.ull !`e :Tmde l n the pay-nAnt of the rent 'PI rtSoroaai d , or If the as S ti LrSScx nhsll ¢Solnte, tiny o: the covcnantn cif tY•iv letro, then saki snall heQeme•- tenant ut a•tSfersncr., heretiv t nSv ;n ail, r1:7.nt c: nail ems, bred trrt. L •SS�ti :' uhtill It. or.t: t.leA 1 n -n- disttely tc Y----enter tend rr -take: por.nonston •o!' the dea:^i-sud -rrt-miner. I' :s al.%c understood rend ,:!;reed tt.st. t:no T. :;nits rt. to pay tLe. tnxor., s,.eclal aaoesaror.tts, lrsnur. net, rnd ;r ,ern! 'hod ordinar1 I ?steep cad repair tar said btA1-1de rat;. t '.0 c P *.w t o .r 4 1. ILT.tta..s3'f G "R x I 'Y thot. on this dv, -, , os n ,ran7l.y w ponred hip1rovn me. an oificor dnly author-Imed to int4minietcr oathzv #%nd tukn d+eirTxr,trlt +ci ;tanr,tz;, f.+L'`UFG #• C. rind af.S':LF_N 11.. HA104'1 !: CL)Z t.- ;me well kxicun to be the persons domerr*tbcd In -arid who axemuted Lr-, u I`c, ve rci nv L. RLE , antl they nctmowledged before mu that they 07+0cl-7Cd t)-e same s'or tho pttrpones tAorcIn axprea9irsedl IN W4 MESS W11R.:Ir-OF, a have herct:,r.tc. P6t my h,and. and 9 £`fi.f-Aral ;may ofxictal 04--al apt C :LL- '- A3Zk:A'T1,H, oaald .Co."XV'z;, nndi Stnte, t.hkab 1.8~1.1 day vs l3ey; .A. gl, I sJG. Notary Putlic ` My Commiesaion £rpiroz: ` Mad a-v ltubUc. Setts e-1 % at %rap My [sir i+a lvr' *syt* WF r a• j?fA _.. .. LdonCsc des .s srirvrt :xu�as Ca, of N,Y. i silo f*r reedric Teri WITNESS O%Lr handa and meals this 18th 69y of May, ' A. D.. 1?56. ` Signed, Samled And Diftlivore(! In Praoence chi: _ -�"�t --E'er. �. �� ,..� �� ' _ �,.,acr,�� - - �`�+� --•�-� � .,.�� t : � s•; s r, ) }S:•` ". r: !its d•' ds.ii� _ €, s t;i `' � Y w .47- '.0 c P *.w t o .r 4 1. ILT.tta..s3'f G "R x I 'Y thot. on this dv, -, , os n ,ran7l.y w ponred hip1rovn me. an oificor dnly author-Imed to int4minietcr oathzv #%nd tukn d+eirTxr,trlt +ci ;tanr,tz;, f.+L'`UFG #• C. rind af.S':LF_N 11.. HA104'1 !: CL)Z t.- ;me well kxicun to be the persons domerr*tbcd In -arid who axemuted Lr-, u I`c, ve rci nv L. RLE , antl they nctmowledged before mu that they 07+0cl-7Cd t)-e same s'or tho pttrpones tAorcIn axprea9irsedl IN W4 MESS W11R.:Ir-OF, a have herct:,r.tc. P6t my h,and. and 9 £`fi.f-Aral ;may ofxictal 04--al apt C :LL- '- A3Zk:A'T1,H, oaald .Co."XV'z;, nndi Stnte, t.hkab 1.8~1.1 day vs l3ey; .A. gl, I sJG. Notary Putlic ` My Commiesaion £rpiroz: ` Mad a-v ltubUc. Setts e-1 % at %rap My [sir i+a lvr' *syt* WF r a• j?fA _.. .. LdonCsc des .s srirvrt :xu�as Ca, of N,Y. i silo f*r reedric Teri • .0 121 -0 9 t; 113 RE SO 1, U T ION No. 71 - 92 WHERE'AS, it has been requcsted by Guorge C. Hartison Realty Company and Fi.amk Schoen wissnc-r, the ownur of certain rcal property in Lake View Heights, in the City of ClearvraLcr, Florida, that the City of Clearwater, Florida, vacate a, certain portion of dedicated right of way kno%vn as South Sireet; and X cessary nor rcqLUirCd dlICI it WIJH�'REAS, said 1 tight of way is not nL is deemed to be to the bust interest and advanttgc of flic; City and tho genr!ral public that the sm-mo be vacated; NOW,, THrR1:_'jY0RF-, BJT T � T.PUESOLVED J,-)Y THE CITY CO)AIMISSION Or THE CITY OF CLEARVVATER, FLORMA, IN SESSION DI-11-Y AND REGULARLY ASSEMBLE].), AS FOLLOWS: That the foflowing: V. That portion of South Strc-ut (fori-nerly phatted as Lakeview Drive.) lying be- oxcork Blocks "Ell and "Pt and East of the East right of \vay line of -Michigan Avenuc as shown on the Plat of Lakc-, View Heights as recorded in Plat Book 1.3, page 5 of tllv. Public RQcords of P-inuAas County, Floridti., and Wust of 01-je West right of way line of Missouri A vunuc, as reloc.ated and recorded in Book. 1353, page 23, and ©.R. Book 1135-1, page 3771, oA the Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida, be and 'Llic- same is liccn-eby vacated, closed and released, and the City of Clearwater hereby quit, claims and releases all of its right, title and interest thcrc-to to the persons, firms or corporations entitled thereto by la\•, excepting that the City of Clearwater hereby retains a- tvventy foot (2W1 drainage fUld Utility cascrncnt lying 'con fee-- (10') each side of the existing c(niterlinc of South Street for the installati.onand m;-a4itenance of all public Utilitics. 2. That the City Clerk is hereby directed to record this Resolution in the Public Recor6s of Pinellas County, Florida. PASSED AND ADOPTED this bath day of Au t A. D, 197 R sit" T Line Items: Case No 7/2/2008 Receipt #: 1200800000000005477 12:09:4 Date: 07 /02/2008 Tran Code Description Revenue Account No Amount Paid FLD2008 -07021 04 Flexible Commercial 001000000341262000 1,205.00 FLD2008 -07021 Fire - Prelim Site Plan 001000000342501000 200.00 Line Item Total: $1,405.00 Payments: Method Payer Initials Check No Confirm No How Received Amount Paid Check FLORIDA PAIN MANAGEMENT adb 1030 In Person 1,405. INC Payment Total: $1,405.00 THIS IS NOT A PERMIT. This is a receipt for an application for a permit. This application will be reviewed and you will be notified as to the outcome of the application. Page 1 of 1 cReceipt.tpt F y�YL, PLANNING DEPARTMENT i • CITY OF CLEARWATER. POST OFFICE BOX 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758 -4748 MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562 -4567 FAX (727) 562 -4865 September 16, 2008 Mr. Dillon Alderman Southeast Principal The Waterfield Design Group, Inc. 4340 South Manhattan Avenue Tampa, Florida 33611 Re: FLD2008 -07021 1 1314 S. Missouri Avenue Dear Mr. Alderman: This letter constitutes a Development Order pursuant to Community Development Code (CDC) Section 4- 206.D.6. On September 16, 2008, the Community Development Board (CDB) reviewed your Flexible Development approval for a medical clinic within the Commercial (C) District with a lot area of 48,320 square feet, a lot width of 512 feet, a building height of 25 feet, front (east) setbacks of 9.58 feet (to building) and 11 feet (to parking), side (north) setbacks of 149 feet (to building) and 10 feet (to parking), side (south) setbacks of 116 feet (to building) and 5.99 feet (to parking), rear (west) setbacks of 4.47 feet (to building) and 2.5 feet (to parking), with 47 off - street parking spaces as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project as per Community Development Code Section 2- 704.C. The CDB APPROVED the application with conditions based upon the following findings of fact and r.mr_.liicinng of layer. Findings of Fact: 1. That the 1.11 acre subject property is located on the west side of Missouri Avenue, approximately 200 feet south of Lakeview Road; 2: That the subject property is located within the Commercial (C) District and the Commercial General (CG) Future Land Use Plan category and will consist of a 16,374 square foot medical clinic and associated off - street parking lots and solid waste facility; 3. That the existing building and off - street parking lot encroach into the required setbacks for the Commercial (C) District, and the proposed modifications will substantially reduce these existing nonconformities; and 4. That the prior retail sales and service use of the property did not meet the minimum off - street parking requirement, and that the proposed modifications and change of use will bring the site into compliance with off - street parking requirements. Conclusions of Law: 1. That the development proposal has been found to be in compliance with the Maximum Development Potential standards as per CDC Section 2- 701.1; 2. That the development proposal has been found to be in compliance with the applicable Standards and Criteria as per CDC Section 2 -704; 3. That the development proposal has been found to be in compliance with the Flexibility criteria for a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project as per CDC Section 2- 704.C; and 4. That the development proposal has been found to be in compliance with the General Standards for Level Two Approvals as per CDC Section 3- 913.A. "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER" September 16, 2008 FLD2008 -07021 1.1314 S. Missouri Avenue Page 2 of 2 0 Conditions of Approval: 1. That prior to the issuance of any building permits, any outstanding comments of the Engineering Department shall be addressed; 2. That prior to issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy, all on -site utility facilities, whether they be existing or proposed, are to be placed underground as part of the redevelopment of the site; 3. That any /all wireless communication facilities to be installed concurrent with or subsequent to the construction of the subject development must be screened from view and/or painted to match the building to which they are attached, as applicable; 4. That any /all future signage must meet the requirements of Code and be architecturally integrated with the design of the building with regard to proportion, color, material and finish as part of a final sign package submitted to and approved by Staff prior to the issuance of any permits which includes: (a) All signs fully dimensioned and coordinated in terms of including the same color and font style and size; and (b) All signs be constructed of the highest quality materials which are coordinated with the colors, materials and architectural style of the building; and 5. That the final design and color of the building shall be consistent with the architectural elevations submitted to (or as modified by) the CDB, and be approved by Staff. Pursuant to Community Development Code Section 4 -407, an application for a building permit shall be made within one year of Flexible Development approval (September 16, 2009). All required certificates of occupancy shall be obtained within two years of the date of issuance of the initial building permit. The building permit must be obtained within six months of the initial permit application. This timeframe to obtain the initial building permit may be extended for an additional six months for cause by the Community Development Coordinator. Time frames do not change with successive owners. The Community Development Coordinator may grant an extension of time for the Flexible Development approval for a period not to exceed one year and only within the original period of validity. The Community Development Board may approve one additional extension of time for the Flexible Development approval after the Community Development Coordinator's cx CnsIon o iiii�iate $ vuiiumg peiiTii� application. The issuance of this Development Order does not relieve you of the necessity to obtain any building permits or pay any impact fees that may be required. In order to facilitate the issuance of any permit or license affected by this approval, please bring a copy of this letter with you when applying for any permits or licenses that require this prior development approval. Additionally, an appeal of a Level Two approval (Flexible Development) may be initiated pursuant to Community Development Code Section 4 -502.B by the applicant or by any person granted party status within 14 days of the date of the CDB meeting. The filing of an application/notice of appeal shall stay the effect of the decision pending the final determination of the case. The appeal period for your case expires on September 30, 2008 (14 days from the date of the CDB meeting). Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact Robert G. Tefft, Development Review Manager, at (727) 562 -4539 or via e -mail at robert.tefft@myclearwater.com. Sincerely, Micch�el , Planning Director S: (Planning Departmen6C D BIFLEX (FLD)Ilnactive or Finished Applications Wissouri Ave S 1314 Florida Pain Mgmt (C) 2008 09 -16 RTIMissouri Ave S 1314 - Development Order 2008 09- 16.doc 0 f DRC Review Comments Case Number: FLD2008 -07021 —1314 South Missouri Avenue Location: 1314 South Missouri Avenue, Clearwater Florida 33756 Atlas Page: 306A Zoning District: C, Commercial Proposed Use: Medical Clinic Please find below a response to the DRC plan review comments issued for the DRC meeting of Thursday, August 7, 2008. General Engineering: 1 Prior to review by the Community Development Board: 1. Please find the utilities plan sheet (S.8) which has been added to the plan set. A 6" water line is proposed to serve the new fire hydrants. This new water line will originate from a 6" line on Michigan Avenue and run though an existing public drainage and utilities easement to the project site. We will provide a loop connection to avoid stagnation of the water as directed by the City of Clearwater engineering department. Prior to issuance of a building permit: 1. We will provide a copy of an approved FDOT for any work proposed within the right of way. 2. Please find that the dumpster enclosure has been relocated the Northerly parking lot and the standard City of Clearwater construction detail Index #701 has been added to sheet S.2. 3. The dumpster enclosure has been relocated to the northerly parking lot. 4. This comment has been noted as note 2 under the utilities notes on sheet 5.8: 5. A thirty feet turning radius has been incorporated into the northern most drive entry for solid waste servicing of the dumpster enclosure. All other entry and exit points have existing curb cuts. 6. The sanitary connection is shown on sheet 5.8. Standard detail Index # 305 can also be found on sheet 5.8. 7. This comment has been added as note 3 under the utilities notes on sheet 5.8. 8. This comment has been added as note 4 under the utilities notes on sheet 5.8. • • Prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy: 1. Please find this comment addressed in note 4 under general notes on sheet 5.2. There are notes on the plan sheet S.2 referencing this note where applicable. The F.D.O.T. Index #304 can be found on sheet 5.8. 2. Five sets of as-built drawings will be provided to the City at the conclusion of development for review and inspection. Environmental: Fire: 1. This comment has been added as note 5 under the general notes on sheet 5.2. 1. Per our discussion at the DRC meeting, fire access will be from South Missouri Avenue and access drive aisles will not be required on site. 2. This comment has been added as note 6 under the general notes on sheet 5.2. 3. Please see sheet S.8 illustrating the proposed location of a new 6" water line to service the proposed fire hydrants. Land Resources: 1. The tree canopies have been added to all applicable plan sheets. 2. The dumpster has been relocated to the northerly parking lot. Landscaping: 1. Per the Comprehensive Landscape application the landscape buffer has been enhanced with a six -foot tall privacy fence with creeping fig planted at two - feet on center to provide enhanced screening in lieu of hedges and 12 foot buffer where landscape requirements cannot be met. 2. Code required landscape deficiencies have been addressed by enhanced vegetation plantings per Comprehensive Landscape application. 3. Southerly buffer requirements have been enhanced with solid hedge plantings over the entire buffer in lieu of the required width per Comprehensive Landscape application. 4. Please see Sheet 5.3, enhanced vegetative plantings have been provided to alleviate buffer deficiencies per Comprehensive Landscape application. 5. Please find on Sheet S.3 that trees have been relocated and re- spaced to meet the requirements of the code. 6. This requirement cannot be met because of existing site conditions that overhead power lines run parallel to 84% of our site boundary — see Comprehensive Landscape application. • 7. Please find on Sheet S.3 that the southerly parking lot has been reconfigured so that the deficiencies in the landscape island requirements are addressed per the Comprehensive Landscape application. 8. Please find on Sheet S.3 that tree species have been redistributed to meet the requirements with the exception of those trees that are accent plants. 9. Please find Comprehensive Landscape application previously submitted. 10. Please see Sheet S.3 for planting revisions. 11. Please find on Sheet S.2 and S.3 that the required curbing has been added to the parking lot. 12. Please find on Sheet S.3 that the tree planting spacing has been revised. Stormwater: The following shall be addressed prior to issuance of building permit: We are submitting a revised plan (sheet S.4) reflecting the reconfiguration of the parking lot. These changes have negligible affect on the calculations previously provided. We have submitted a permit application to SWPWMD and have received review comments from them. Their comments and requests for additional information were very similar to those in comment items 1 through 6. We will provide this information and any other need documents with our permit application. Item 7: Potential impacts to the adjacent properties were considered in the course of the design for the infiltration pond. The pond was sized to ensure the peak elevation during the 24- hour, 100 -year storm ( 60.8') would be below the floor elevations of the adjacent properties (min. FFE= 61.5). This coupled with the rapid infiltration rate inherent to the on site soils, an observed distance above Seasonal High Water Table (SHWT) elevation of over 6' and the overall flat site topography will prevent migration of infiltrated stormwater beyond the limits of the pond footprint. Solid Waste: 1. Please find the dumpster enclosure location has been moved to the northerly parking lot and the Index #701 details have been added to sheet S.2. Traffic Engineering: 1. Please see sheets S.2 & S.3; the parallel parking spaces have been deleted. • 2. The proposed driveway connections serve two parking areas at existing curb cut locations. Each has a one -way entry and exit. These parking areas represent a reconfiguration of and improvement to existing conditions. The proposed parking entry and exit configuration on the southerly portion of the site is very similar to the one -way entry and exit drive locations that currently exist. However the current configuration also has drive surface area between the lanes. The proposed design removes that drive surface for better circulation control. The northerly parking entry and exit drives are an improved controlled circulation configuration over the current condition. The current parking condition on the northerly portion on the site requires some cars and delivery trucks to back onto South Missouri Avenue. 3. The driveway separation does not meet the 125 feet spacing because we are utilizing the existing curb cut locations. These are preexisting conditions that we are utilizing. 4. We will provide a copy of an approved FDOT for any work proposed within the right of way. 5. This comment has been added as note 3 under the general notes on sheet 5.2. 6. Please find this detail on sheet 5.8. 7. Please find this detail on sheet S.2. General Notes: 1. This comment has been added as note 7 under the general notes on sheet S.2 Planning: 1. Please find on sheet S.2 that the southerly parking lot has been reconfigured for compliance. The landscaping deficiencies are addressed in the Comprehensive Landscape application 2. Please find a copy of the revised response attached. 3. This comment has been noted as note 5 under the utilities notes on sheet 5.8. 4. This comment has been addressed as note 2 under the general notes on sheet S.2 5. Please find on sheet S.2 that the dimension has been added to the plan. 6. Please find on sheet S.2 that the walk has been reduced. to 42" wide. 7. Resolved at DRC meeting. 8. Please find on sheet S.6 the requested information. Please also find color and awning material samples with the submittal package. 9. The existing adjacent grade is very close to the finish floor elevation. The building height will not exceed the 25 feet height limit. 10. Please find on sheet S.2 that both the northerly and southerly parking lots have been reconfigured to accommodate the required separation. • • 11. The applicant proposes to operate this medical clinic the same as their current Florida Pain Management facility located in St. Petersburg. It is not operated like an office facility. There are no deliveries at the St Petersburg facility made by any vehicle that would require a loading space. We request a deviation from this requirement because it will not serve or support the operation of this project. 12. The proposed driveway connections serve two parking areas at existing curb cut locations. Each has a one -way entry and exit. These parking areas represent a reconfiguration of and improvement to existing conditions. The proposed parking entry and exit configuration on the southerly portion of the site is very similar to the one -way entry and exit drive locations that currently exist. However the current configuration also has drive surface area between the lanes. The proposed design removes that drive surface for better circulation control. The northerly parking entry and exit drives are an improved controlled circulation configuration over the current condition. The current parking condition on the northerly portion on the site requires some cars and delivery trucks to back onto South Missouri Avenue. If you have any questions please call: (813) 833 -5161 Thank you, Dillon John Alderman The Waterfield Design Group, Inc. LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL DATE: August 15, 2008 TO: City of Clearwater, Municipal Services Building, 100 South Myrtle Ave. Suite 210 ATTENTION: Mr. Wayne Wells, Planning and Zoning REFERENCE: Florida Pain Management Office, 1314 South Missouri Avenue, Clearwater, Florida 33756 WDG PROJECT NUMBER: WE ARE SENDING YOU: W :1382 15 Copies of DRC Response Letter 15 Copies of the Application Fee Receipt 15. Copies Florida Development Application Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project And Attachments (D -1, D -2, A, B) 15 Copies of the Deed . 15 Copies of the Stormwater Calculations (Includes Stormwater Narrative) 15 Copies of Receipt of SWFWMD Application 15 Copies of the Tree, Topography, and Boundary Survey • (1 Original Signed and Sealed) 15 Copies of the Site, Drainage, and Landscape, Elevations, and Sign Plans 15 Copies 8.5 "x11" Color Site Plan 15 Copies 8.5 "x11" Color Landscape Plan 15 Copies Comprehensive Landscape Program Application 15 Copies 8.5 "x11" Color Building Elevations 1 Set of color'swatches, awning sample 15 Copies of the plat 15 Copies of the Geotechnical Report Signed: 10:30 am Case Number: FLD2008- 0702 *1314 S MISSOURI AVE • Owner(s): George Realty Co 1330 S Missouri Ave Clearwater, Fl 33756 TELEPHONE: No Phone, FAX: No Fax, E -MAIL: No Email Representative: Dillon Alderman Waterfield Design Group Tampa, F133611 TELEPHONE: 813 - 839 -5700, FAX: 813 - 839 - 5774,, E -MAIL: dalderman @waterfielddesign.com Location: 1.1 -acre parcel on the west side of Missouri Avenue, approximately 200 feet south of Lakeview Road Atlas Page: 306A Zoning District: C, Commercial Request: Flexible Development approval for a medical clinic within the Commercial (C) District with a lot area of 48,320 square feet, a lot width of 512 feet, a building height of 25 feet, front (west) setbacks of 10 feet (to building) and zero feet (to parking), side (north) setbacks of 143.99 feet (to building) and 10 feet (to parking), side (south) setbacks of 116.69 feet (to building) and 3.75 feet (to parking), rear (east) setbacks of 4.45 feet (to building) and 2.14 feet (to parking), with 51 off - street parking spaces as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project as per Community Development Code Section 2- 704.C. Proposed Use: Medical clinic Neighborhood Clearwater Neighborhoods Coalition Association(s): Clearwater, F133763 1821 Springwood Cir S TELEPHONE: No Phone, FAX: No Fax, E -MAIL: No Email Neighborhood South Clearwater Citizens For Progr Association(s): Clearwater, F133756 1120 Kingsley St. TELEPHONE: No Phone, FAX: No Fax, E -MAIL: duketieman @aol.com Presenter: Robert Tefft, Planner III Attendees Included: WW'V_ " The DRC reviewed this application with the following comments: General Engineering: Development Review Agenda - Thursday, August 7, 2008 - Page 15 DRC Action Aycoda I.I Prior to review by thRommunity Development Board: is .� 1. The two proposed Fire Hydrant Assemblies need to be connected to a water main having an inside diameter of not less than 6 ". Presently only a 2" water main is located on the west side of Missouri Avenue in front of this property. Describe how connections will be made to a properly sized water main. Prior to issuance of a building permit: 1. Applicant shall provide a copy of an approved FDOT right -of -way permit for all work proposed to take place in Missouri Avenue (S.R. 651). 2. New dumpster enclosure shall be constructed in accordance with City of Clearwater Contract Specifications and Standards, Index #701. Note outside width of approved dumpster enclosure is 14' -4". 3. South parking lot has insufficient maneuvering room for solid waste vehicular access to dumpster. A minimum turning radius of 30' is required to provide this access. 4. Because the proposed occupancy of the building is medical office, the applicant/owner will be responsible for all associated fees for a required reduced pressure B.F.P.D.. (back flow preventor device). Article IV, Water, Sec. 32.140(2). 5. Turning radii at all driveways shall be a minimum of 30 feet per City of Clearwater Contract Specifications and Standards index #108. 6. Show location of the sanitary connection to this building. Once located, show on the plans a double -sweep cleanout to be provided in the street right -of -way and include applicable Clearwater Contract Specifications and Standards Index #305. 7. Applicant shall pay all applicable sewer and water impact fees prior to issuance of the building permit. S. The 3 -foot utility easement lying along the rear property of the site will need to be staked out and an Engineering Easement Inspection requested and approved before construction activities commence. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy: 1. Applicant shall bring all substandard sidewalks and sidewalk ramps adjacent to or a part of the project up to standard, including A.D.A. (Truncated domes per D.O.T. Index #304.). 2. Applicant shall submit 5 sets of as -built drawings that are signed and sealed by a State of Florida Registered Professional Engineer. The Construction Services Inspector will field inspect as -built drawings for accuracy. General Note: If the proposed project necessitates infrastructure modifications to satisfy site - specific water capacity and pressure requirements and/or wastewater capacity requirements, the modifications shall be completed by the applicant and at their expense. If underground water mains and hydrants are to be installed, the installation shall be completed and in service prior to construction in accordance with Fire Department requirements. General Note: DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. Environmental: I . Please Note: An Asbestos Survey is required prior to conducting any demolition or renovations. Please contact the Pinellas County Air Quality Department at (727) 464 -4422 for further information. Fire: Development Review Agenda - Thursday, August 7, 2008 - Page 16 DRC Action Agcnda L I eq, One way drive aisle3"�Cre required to be 20' minimum width for fire Als. Show on plan -PRIOR TO CDB — - .- -- - 2. Must Comply with Ordinance No. 7617 -06 Radio System Regulations for buildings, install 911 Radio Repeater / Antenna Booster System Provide acknowledgment of intent to comply PRIOR TO CDB 3 . Plan shows fire hydrants being added. This plan shows a 2" water line. Fire Hydrants can not come off of a 2" line. Check with Public Utilities Coordinator Mr. Terry LaBelle @ (727) 562 -4960 ext. 7227 Acknowledge PRIOR to CDB arbor Master: No Comments gal: // `` No Comments Land Resources: ./ 1 . Show the canopies of all trees to remain on all plan sheets. Provide prior to CDB. 12. Reassess the location of the dumpster as there is not enough vertical height under the trees to dump the container. Resolve prior to CDB. Landscaping: Development Review Agenda - Thursday, August 7, 2008 - Page 17 DRC Action Aecnda I.I 1 . Pursuant to CommuRR'y Development Code (CDC) Section 3- 12024, where adjacent to detached dwellings, a landscape buffer with a minimum width of 12 feet shall be provided with trees every 35 feet and a hedge extending along the full length of the perimeter. The required buffer width is not provided at any point along the property line and the majority of the buffer does not consist of any landscaping. Please be advised that pursuant to CDC Section 3- 1202.D.2, the front slopes of stormwater retention areas may comprise up to 50% of a required landscape buffer width. As proposed the entire stormwater retention area is part of the buffer. 2. Pursuant to Community Development Code (CDC) Section 3- 1202.A.2, any landscape area serving a new use of a change of use shall satisfy the standards of this division. There are several areas of the site that do not meet code; these must be improved as part of this application. 3 Pursuant to Community Development Code (CDC) Section 3- 1202.D.3, as the subject property is greater than one acre, a landscape buffer with a minimum width of 10 feet shall be provided along both the north and south property lines. While the proposed north buffer meets this requirement, the south buffer does not and must be modified. 4. Pursuant to Community Development Code (CDC) Section 3- 1202.D.1, where adjacent to an arterial/collector right -of -way, a landscape buffer with a minimum width of 15 feet shall be provided. While this is provided for a majority of the property, it is not provided adjacent to the parallel parking spaces, at the southeast corner of the property, or adjacent to the proposed covered entry. 5 . Pursuant to Community Development Code (CDC) Section 3- 1202.B.1, shade trees must be plated a minimum of five feet from any impervious area. The shade trees proposed within the central landscape island in the north parking lot do not meet this requirement. Additionally, the existing oak tree at the south property line does not meet this requirement and will need to comply with the revisions to the south parking lot. 6. Pursuant to Community Development Code (CDC) Section 3- 1202.13.1, accent trees shall account for no more than 25% of the required trees. As proposed, accent trees account for approximately 50% of the required trees. 7. Pursuant to Community Development Code (CDC) Section 3- 1202.E.1, interior landscape islands shall be a minimum of 150 square feet and have a width of 8 feet from back of curb to back of curb. The interior landscape islands within the south parking lot do not meet this provision and must be revised. 8. Pursuant to Community Development Code (CDC) Section 3- 1202.B.4, each tree species shall account for a minimum of 10% of the total number of trees. The development proposal does not meet this requirement. 9. Please be advised that pursuant to CDC Section 3- 1202.G, landscape requirements matey, be waived or modified with the submittal of a Comprehensive Landscape application that satisfies the requried criteria. 10. Pursuant to Community Development Code (CDC) Section 3- 1202.E.1, a minimum of one tree is required within each interior landscape island. The landscape islands at the northwest and southwest corners of the south parking lot do not have the required number of trees (only two palms at the northwest, and only one accent tree at the southwest). 11 . Pursuant to Community Development Code (CDC) Section 3- 1204.1), all landscaping shall be protected from vehicular traffic by curbing. Curbing is not proposed along the west side of the drive aisle for the south parking lot and is not depicted along the landscape areas on the east half of the north parking lot. 12. The west landscape buffer for the north parking lot consists of numerous trees that are proposed to be planted far too close to one another (10 feet on center). Trees, or tree groupings should be planted approximately 25 feet to 35 feet on center depending upon the species. Revise the plan to provide for a more functional landscape design. Parks and Recreation: 1 . No issues - change of use from retail to medical - reduction in bldg footpring. Stormwater: Development Review Agenda - Thursday, August 7, 2008 - Page 18 DRC Anion Agenda I The following shallf addressed prior to issuance of Building Permil 1. Provide a copy of the approved FDOT permit for the proposed outfall drainage connection 2. Provide a copy of the approved SWFWMD permit. 3. Show on the Paving and Grading plan the 50'adjaceriLlopography along with the finished floor elevation of the existing structures within this aramete . 4. Please revise the drainage calculation showing the following information: a) Stage /storage table, b) drawdown analysis demonstrating that the pond recovers within 24 hours or less, c) Weir design calculations to show that post - development discharge is equal or less than the pre - development discharge, d) Minimum Time of Concentration is 60 minutes, not 15 minutes as current design (Per section 8, page 4 of City of Clearwater Stormwater Criteria, "Detention design shall incorporate a minimum time of concentration of one hour and 25 -year storni intensity"). 5. Control structure detail shall show the following elevations: Weir invert, skimmer top and bottom, outfall invert, pond bottom, \o 6. Provide stormwater managment facility maintenance schedule. 7. Have the relatively low finished floor elevations of the existing structures located on the west `oq)o�-A' side of the subject property been considered in design of the pond? Provide explanation. General note: 1. DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. 2. At building permit application, applicant shall submit drainage report, soil report, and any other drainage related document for review and record. Solid Waste: I . That dumpster enclousure(s) needs to be brought up to City specifications. re- locate enclosure Traf ' Engineering: Remove the parallel parking spaces and the vehicular access located in front of the proposed arallel parking spaces to reduce vehicular and pedestrian conflict points. 2. rovide justification for the proposed number of driveway connections along Missouri venue to satisfy section 3 -1402 of the Community Development Code, that limits the number of driveway accesses to no more than one entrance and one exit or combined entrance and exit per street frontage. 3. Provide justification for driveways with a spacing of less than 125 feet apart along Missouri Avenue to satisfy Section 3 -102 B. of the Community Development Code. Section 3 -102 F. provides for an exception to the spacing requirement if the appicant can demonstrate the driveway installations will enhance the safety or operation of the roadway. 4. Obtain FDOT permit for driveway access or other work within the state road right -of -way. 5. Install "stop ", "do not enter ", and "one -way" signage where appropriate per current Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices. 6. Show detail of and install ADA standard truncated domes where sidewalk crosses all driveways and/or vehicular travel areas. Use link provided and see FDOT detail 304 page 6 of 6 (http://www.dot.state.fl.us/rddesign/rd/RTDS/08/304.pdf). 7. Show detail of current City of Clearwater's handicap parking stall (series 118). Use link provided: http: / /www.myclearwater.com/gov/ depts/ pwa/ engin /Production/stddet/index.asp 8. On the handicap sign detail change the fine to read $255 and the Florida Statute to read 318.18. The above to be addressed prior to a Community Development Board (CDB) hearing. Planning: General Note(s): 1. Applicant shall comply with the current Transportation Impact Fee Ordinance and fee schedule and paid prior to a Certificate of Occupancy (C.O.). 2. DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. Development Review Agenda - Thursday, August 7, 2008 - Page 19 DRC A«kn Ag,,Wa I.I Notes 1 . Pursuanl to Commum'Development Code (CDC) Section 3- 1401.B.2, y parking area which is to serve a new use of land shall satisfy the requirements of the Code as they pertain to parking and landscaping. Virtually the entire south parking lot is non - conforming with regard to parking and landscape code requirements and must be brought in to full compliance. 2. Pursuant to Community Development Code (CDC) Section 3- 913.A.5, the proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. The written response provided to this criterion does not seem to make sense or address the criterion. Provide a revised response. 3 . Pursuant to Community Development Code (CDC) Section 3 -911, all utilities, including individual distribution lines, shall be installed underground. 4. Pursuant to Community Development Code (CDC) Section 3- 201.D.1, outside mechancial equipment shall be completely screened. from view from public streets and abutting properties. How is the existing /proposed mechanical equipment proposed to. be screened in compliance with the above? 5. The description of request provided states a proposed front setback of 9' -8" for the covered entry. Dimension this setback on the proposed site plan. 6. Reduce the width of the 8 -foot concrete sidewalk to 42 ". >< Clarify the intended purpose of extending the canopy into the drive aisle of the north parking lot. 8. Revise the architectural elevations to denote the proposed materials and colors. Also, provide swatches for paint colors and a sample of the awning material. /4+j0 Pursuant to the definition of height as set forth in CDC Section 8 -102, building height is measured from existing grade. The proposed elevations appear to measure the building height from finished floor. Revise the building elevations. - 10 . Pursuant to Community Development Code (CDC) Section 3- 1406.13.2, the minimum distance .between the right -of -way and the first parking space or drive aisle shall be 20 feet. The drive aisle associated with the parallel spaces does not meet this requirement; therefore the aisle and its associated parking spaces should be eliminated. The ingress aisles of the north and south parking lots do not meet this requirement. However, in this instanace it may be appropriate to request a reduction to the stacking distance requirement to 14 feet and 15 feet, respectively, and provide a traffic study justifying /supporting said request. 11 . Pursuant to Community Development Code (CDC) Section 3- 1406.A.2, the proposed use (determined to be consistent with the office category for these purposes) requires one loading space. The proposal does not provide for this space. Revise the plan to comply with this requirement or request and justify, per code, a deviation to this requirement. 12. Pursuant to Community Development Code (CDC) Section 3- 1402.13, there shall be no more than one entrance and one exit of one combined entrance and exit per property along any street unless otherwise determined necessary by the traffic engineer to alleviate congestion and improve traffic flow. Other: No Comments Development Review Agenda - Thursday, August 7, 2008 - Page 20 DRC Action Agenda I.I 0 eir M PLANNING DEPARTMENT July 15, 2008 Mr. Dillon Alderman Southeast Principal The Waterfield Design Group, Inc. 4340 South Manhattan Avenue Tampa, Florida 33611 CITY OF C LEARWATE R POST OFFICE BOX 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758 -4748 MUNICIPAL. SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE'(727) 562 -4567 FAx (727) 562 -4865 RE: FLD2008 -07021 1 1314 South Missouri Avenue I Letter of Completeness Dear Mr. Alderman: ** VIA FAX /MAIL ** The Planning Department staff has entered your application into the Department's filing system and assigned the case number FLD2008- 07021. After a preliminary review of the submitted documents, staff has determined that the application is complete. The Development Review Committee (DRC) will review the application for sufficiency on Thursday, August 7, 2008, in the Planning Department Conference Room (Room 216), which is located on the second floor of the Municipal Services Building at 100 South Myrtle Avenue. You will be contacted by the Planning Department's Administrative Analyst within one week prior to the meeting date for the approximate time that your case will be reviewed. You or your representative (as applicable) must be present to answer any questions that the DRC may have regarding your application. Additional comments may be generated by the DRC at the time of the meeting. Sincerely, Robert G. Tefft, Planner III Tel: (727) 562 -4539 Fax: (727) 562 -4865 E -Mail: robe rt. tefft@myclearwater.corn "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER" CITY OF CLEARWATER LL PLANNING DEPARTMENT ° } ate r 100 SOUTH MYRTLE MTENUE -, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 U TEL: (727) 562 -4567 FAX: (727) 562 -4865 FACSIMILE COVER SHEET ` Date: July W, 2008. To: Dillon. Alderman, The Waterfield Design. Group, (813) 839 -5774 From:. Robert G. Tefft, Planner III Re: FLD2008- 07021. 1. 1314. S. Missouri Avenue (Florida Pain. Management) Number of Pages. Including Cover Sheet: 2. Comments :. ** Please confirm receipt via e-mail at: robert .tcfft(rintycleanvater.conz ** ** Visit the Planning Department online at www.myclearwater.com ** ITA PEI E-, • Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project Florida Pain Management Center Date: July 14th, 2008 To: Mr. Robert G. TeM Planner III - City of Clearwater, Planning department Case #: FLD2008 -07021 Address: 1314 South Missouri Avenue Clearwater, Florida QMSINft 4 Mr. Tefit, In response to your Letter of Incompleteness dated July 8, 2008 Waterfield Design Group submits the following: 1. Per section G of the Comprehensive IrM Redevelopment Project application, we have included on the proposed site plan, all dimensions including southern parking lot, all required setbacks, and all required sight visibility triangles. 2. Per Section H of the Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project application, we have included on the landscape plan, delineation and dimensions of all required perimeter landscape buffers, including southern parking lot, sight visibility triangles, and a plant schedule with a key indicating size description, specifications, quantities, and spacing requirements of all existing, and proposed landscape materials including botanical, and common names. If you have any questions, or need clarification of the changes made, please call me at, 813 833 -5161. Thank you, Dillon Alderman The Waterfield Design Group, Inc. CnC-- / lvr.....T.,,..«,... T d,.......,.1.......««.. / ni Oon 1 7 Tc A LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL DATE: 1.4 July, 2008 TO: City of Clearwater, Planning Department Municipal Services Building, 100 South Myrtle Avenue, Clearwater Florida 33756 ATTENTION: Mr. Robert G. TeM Planner III REFERENCE: Case # FLD2008 =07021 Florida Pain Management Clearwater Office, 1314 South Missouri Avenue, Clearwater, Florida 33756 WDG PROJECT NUMBER: WE ARE SENDING YOU: W -1382 1 Origional Response Letter, Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project 15 Copies Site Plan, 24" x 36" 15 Copies Landscape Plan, 24" x 36" 15 Copies Color Landscape Plan, 8.5" x 11" Signed: Z� C= F ® 0 Signed: • r' n� PLANNING DEPARTMENT July 8, 2008 Mr. Dillon Alderman Southeast Principal The Waterfield Design Group, Inc. 4340 South Manhattan Avenue Tampa, Florida 33611 • C ITY OF C LEARWATER POST OFFICE BOX 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758 -4748 MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAx (727) 562 -4865 RE: FLD2008 -07021 1 1314 South Missouri Avenue I Letter of Incompleteness Dear Mr. Alderman: ** VIA FAX /MAIL ** The Planning Department staff has entered your application into the Department's filing system and assigned the case number FLD2008- 07021. After a preliminary review of the submitted documents, staff has determined that the application is incomplete with the following comments: 1. As per Section G of the Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project application,the site plan shall include the following information: all dimensions (provide for southern parking lot); all required setbacks; and all required sight visibility triangles (provide as per CDC Section 3 -904). As per Section H of the Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project application, the landscape plan shall include the following information: delineation and dimensions of all required perimeter landscape buffers (provide for southern parking lot); sight visibility triangles (see CDC Section 2- 903); and a plant schedule with a key indicating the size, description, specifications, quantities, and spacing requirements of all existing and proposed landscape materials, including botanical and common names. Pursuant to Community Development Code (CDC) Section 4 -202, if an application is deemed incomplete, the deficiencies of the application shall be specified by Staff and no further development review action shall be taken until those specified deficiencies are corrected and the application is deemed complete. Please resubmit revised plans and application materials as per the above comments no later than Noon, Monday, July 14, 2008. Should you have any questions,. please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, � � r Robert G. Tefft, Planner III Tel: (727).562-4539 Fax: (727) 562 -4865 E -Mail: robert.tefftgmyclearwa ter. com "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER" LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL DATE: TO: ATTENTION: REFERENCE: 2 July, 2008 City of Clearwater, Municipal Services Building, 100 South Myrtle Ave. Suite 210 Mr. Wayne Wells, Planning and Zoning Florida Pain Management Office, 1314 South Missouri Avenue, Clearwater, Florida 33756 WDG PROJECT NUMBER: VVE ARE SENDING YOU: W -1382 1 /Application Fee Check for $1,405.00 15 Copies Florida Development Application Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project And Attachments (D-1, D-2, A, B) (1 Original Signed and Notarized) 15 Copies of the Deed 15 Copies of the Stormwater Calculations (Includes Stormwater Narrative) (1 Original Signed and Sealed) 15 Copies of Receipt of SWFWMD Application 15 /Copies of the Tree, Topography, and Boundary Survey (1 Original Signed and Sealed) 15 e6eotechniical Report (1 signed and Sealed) 15 Copies of the Recorded Plat 15 Copies of the Site, Drainage, and Lanscape, Elevations, and Sign Plans 15 .Copies 8.5" x 11" Color Site Plan ,P' 15 Copies 8.5" x 11" Color Landscape Plan 15 Copies Comprehensive Landscape Program Application (1 Signed and Notarized) 1 Copy Color Building Elevations 15 Copies 8.5" x 11" Color Building Elevations Color swatches, manufacturer, Signed: py� p p ran^ �u�ri7fiiER •�A 0 of ii LETTER OF { TRANSAUTTAL DATE: TO: REFERENCE: 2 July, 2008 • Southwest Florida Water Management District 7601 US Hwy. 341, Tampa, Florida. 33637 -6759 Florida. Pain Management Clearwater Office, 1314 South Missouri Avenue, Clearwater, Florida 33756 SWFWMD Environmental Resource Permit Application # WDG PROJECT NUMBER: WE ARE SENDING YOU: W -1382 I Permit Application Fee Check for $200.00 5 Copies of Environmental Resource Permit Application Sections A, C and H 5 Copies of Corporate Entity Information 5 Copies of the Application Section A Fart 7 — Project Description 5 Copies of Exhibit A Legal Description 5 Copies of the USGS Quadrangle Map �v 5 Copies of the Site Development Construction Plans and Details % 5 Copies of the Boundary and Topography Graphic Survey 5 Copies of the Project Aerial 1�itu• N.►'A a' 5 Copies of the Surface Water Management Calculations 5 Copies of the Geotechnical Report (I signed and Sealed) 5 Copies of the Surface Water Management System Operation and Maintenance Letter (1; �,_ D 5 Copies of the Deed F 2008 cr, c Signed: CDB Meeting Date: September 16, 2008 Case Number: FLD2008 -07021 Agenda Item: E. 2. Owner: George C. Harrison Realty Co. Applicant: Dr. Kazi Hassan Representative: Dillon Alderman, The Waterfield Design Group, Inc. Address: 1314 South Missouri Avenue CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT GENERAL INFORMATION: REQUEST: Flexible Development approval for a medical clinic within the Commercial (C) District with a lot area of 48,320 square feet, a lot width of 512 feet, a building height of 25 feet, front (east) setbacks of 9.58 feet (to building) and 11 feet (to parking), side (north) setbacks of 149 feet (to building) and 10 feet (to parking), side (south) setbacks of 116 feet (to building) .and 5.99 feet (to parking), rear (west) setbacks of 4.47 feet (to building) and 2.5 feet (to parking), with 47 off - street parking spaces as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project as per Community Development Code Section 2- 704.C. CURRENT ZONING: Commercial (C) District CURRENT FUTURE Commercial General (CG) LAND USE CATEGORY: PROPERTY USE: Former Use: Retail Sales and Services Proposed Use: Medical Clinic EXISTING North: Commercial (C) District SURROUNDING Retail Sales & Services ZONING AND USES: South: Commercial (C) District Offices East: Pinellas County Zoning C -2 Offices, Retail Sales & Services, Vehicle Sales West: Low Medium Density Residential (LMDR) and Medium Density Residential (MDR) Detached Dwellings Community Development Board — September 16, 2008 FLD2008 -07021 — Page 1 0 • ANALYSIS: Site Location and Existing Conditions: The 1.1 -acre subject property is located on the west side of Missouri Avenue, approximately 200 feet south of Lakeview Road. The property is zoned Commercial (C) District with an underlying Future Land Use Plan designation of Commercial General (CG). The property presently consists of a vacant 25,569 square foot building that was most recently occupied by Thomasville Furniture, a 25 -space off - street parking lot on the south side of the building, six (6) parking spaces at the southeast corner of the building that back -out on to Missouri Avenue, and substantial excess asphalt between the building and Missouri Avenue. It is noted that both the existing building and the off - street parking lot are nonconforming with regard to setbacks. Additionally, the off - street parking lot does not meet current design standards (i.e. minimum drive -aisle and parking spaces dimensions) and the back -out parking is not permissible with commercial uses. Development Proposal: On July 2, 2008, a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project application was submitted for the subject property. Under the development proposal a 9,195 square foot portion of the existing building will be demolished to make way for a 22 -space off - street parking lot at the north end of the property. In . addition, the existing 25 -space off - street parking lot at the south end of the property will be reconfigured to meet current design standards, and the existing back -out parking and excess pavement along the east side of the building will be replaced by landscaping. The request had been made as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project as the proposed Medical Clinic use is only specifically authorized within the Commercial (C) District as a Flexible Standard Development (FLS) use with no flexibility in required setbacks and reduced setbacks to the building and pavement have been requested. The development proposal's compliance with the various development standards of the Community Development Code (CDC) is discussed below. Floor Area Ratio (F.A.R.): Pursuant to CDC Section 2- 701.1, within the CG Future Land Use Plan category, the maximum allowable F.A.R. is 0.55; therefore the 1.11 -acre parcel is permitted a maximum of 26,576 square feet of gross floor area. The development proposal is for only 16,374 square feet (0.34 FAR); thus the proposal is in compliance with the above requirement. Impervious Surface Ratio (I.S.R.): Pursuant to CDC Section 2- 701.1, within the CG Future Land Use Plan category, the maximum allowable I.S.R. is 0.95. As proposed, the development will have an I.S.R. of 0.72 and therefore meets the above requirement. Minimum Lot Area/Minimum Lot Width: Pursuant to CDC Section 2 -704, there is no applicable minimum lot area or lot width for Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Projects. However, as a Flexible Standard Development (FLS) use, medical clinics are required a minimum lot area and lot width of 10,000 square feet and 100 feet, respectively. The subject property has a lot area of 48,320 square feet and a lot width of 512 feet, which are both far in excess of those requirements. Maximum Building Height: Pursuant to CDC Section 2 -704, there is no applicable maximum building height for Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Projects. However, as a Flexible Standard Development (FLS) use, medical clinics are permitted a height of 25 feet. The development proposes a building height of 25 feet from the average existing grade, which meets the aforementioned standard for medical clinics. Community Development Board — September 16, 2008 FLD2008 -07021 — Page 2 • • Minimum Setbacks: Pursuant to CDC Section 2 -704, within the C District, there are no applicable minimum setbacks for Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Projects. However, the medical clinic use has a minimum required front setback of 25 feet, a side setback of 10 feet and a rear setback of 20 feet, which is typical for most development within the .0 District. The existing building is generally not compliant with the above requirements. The building has only a 10 -foot setback from the east (front) property line, a 4.24 -foot setback from the north (side) property line and 4.47 -foot setback from the west (rear) property line. However the setback from the south (side) property line is 116.56 feet, which is well in excess of requirements. This south setback will be retained with the proposal as will the west setback. The east setback will be lessened slightly to 9.58 feet for a revised covered entry, and the north setback will be increased to 149 feet as a result of demolishing a large portion of the building. With regard to setbacks to pavement/parking, the majority of the property as it exists has been paved without the provision of any setback. The development proposal will modify this providing a setback between 11 and 15 feet along the east property line, a 10 -foot setback along the north property line, a setback of just less than 6 feet along the south property line, and a 2.5 -foot setback along the west property line. While the west setback sounds insignificant, it must be understood that this distance is for only a 72 -foot segment of the total property, and that for the majority of the property pavement will be set back at least 12 feet. Minimum Off - Street Parking: Pursuant to CDC Section 2 -704, Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Projects shall have their minimum off - street parking requirement determined by the Community Development Coordinator based on the specific use and/or ITE Manual standards. The development proposal would establish a total of 47 off - street parking spaces for the 16,374 square foot medical clinic, which is a rate of 2.87 spaces per 1,000 square feet of gross floor area. Typically, medical clinic uses within the C District are required to provide off - street parking at a rate of three spaces per 1,000 square feet, which in this instance would be the provision of 49 off - street parking spaces - only two more than presently proposed. In its most recent use as a retail sales and services business (Thomasville Furniture), the subject property was substantially nonconforming with regard to the provision of off - street parking. As it exists the building is 25,569 square feet, which at the required rate of five spaces per 1,000 square feet, would require 128 off - street parking spaces. The site, as striped, has 31 parking spaces; however the overwhelming majority of these do not meet current design standards with regard to dimensions or they back into the adjacent Missouri Avenue right -of -way. Thus, there is a substantial nonconformity with regard to off - street parking for a retail sales and services use on the subject property. With this proposal this use of the property will be changed to a use with a less intense off - street parking requirement, a considerable portion of the existing building (9,195 square feet) will be demolished, the nonconforming back -out parking spaces will be eliminated, the existing 25 -space off - street parking lot (south side of property) will be brought into compliance with current design standards, and a new 23- space off - street parking lot will be constructed on the north side of the property. This development proposal represents a substantial improvement upon the properties current situation and is most likely the best opportunity to obtain quality redevelopment of this property. As noted previously, the development proposal is short two off - street parking spaces from achieving a parking requirement of three spaces per 1,000 square feet. However, in order to provide these off - street parking spaces enough of the building would have to be demolished that the parking spaces would no Community Development Board — September 16, 2008 FLD2008 -07021 — Page 3 longer be required. As such, and given the,improvements already being proposed, it has been determined that the development proposal meets is off - street parking requirement. Utilities: Pursuant to CDC Section 3 -911, all utilities, including individual distribution lines, shall be installed underground unless such undergrounding is not practicable. It is attached as a condition of approval that prior to the issuance of certificate of occupancy all on -site utility facilities, whether they be existing or proposed, are to be placed underground as part of the redevelopment of the site. Code Enforcement Analysis: There is no outstanding Code Enforcement issue associated with_the any of the individual subject properties. COMPLIANCE WITH STANDARDS AND CRITERIA: The following table depicts the consistency of the development proposal with the standards and criteria as per CDC Section 2 -704: Community Development Board — September 16, 2008 FLD2008 -07021 — Page 4 Standard Proposed Consistent Inconsistent F.A.R. 0.55 0.34 X I.S.R. 0.95 0.72 X Minimum Lot Area N/A 48,320 SF (1.1 acres) X Minimum N/A 512.18 feet X Lot Width Maximum N/A 25 feet X Building Height Minimum Setbacks Front (east): N/A 9.58 feet (to building) X 11 (to parking) Side (north): N/A 149 feet (to building) X 10 feet (to parking) Side (south): N/A 116 feet (to building) X 5.99 feet (to parking) Rear (west): N/A 4.47 (to building) X 2.5 feet (to parking) Minimum Determined by the Community Development 47 parking spaces X Off - Street Parking Coordinator based on the specific use and/or (2.87/1,000 GFA) ITE Manual standards Community Development Board — September 16, 2008 FLD2008 -07021 — Page 4 • COMPLIANCE WITH FLEXIBILITY CRITERIA: The following table depicts the consistency of the development proposal with the Flexibility criteria as per CDC Section 2 -704.0 (Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project):, Community Development Board — September 16, 2008 FLD2008 -07021 — Page 5 Consistent Inconsistent 1. The development or redevelopment is otherwise impractical without deviations from X the use and /or development standards set forth in this zoning district. 2. The development or redevelopment will be consistent with the goals and policies of X the Comprehensive Plan, as well as with the general purpose, intent and basic planning objectives of this Code, and with the intent and purpose of this zoning district. 3. The development or redevelopment will not impede the normal and orderly X development and improvement of surrounding properties. 4. Adjoining properties will not suffer substantial detriment as a result of the proposed X development 5. The proposed use shall otherwise be permitted by the underlying future land use X category, be compatible with adjacent land uses, will not substantially alter the essential use characteristics of the neighborhood; and shall demonstrate compliance with one or more of the following objectives: a. The proposed use is permitted in this zoning district as a minimum standard, flexible standard or flexible development use; b. The proposed use would be a significant economic contributor to the City's economic base by diversifying the local economy or by creating jobs; c. The development proposal accommodates the expansion or redevelopment of an existing economic contributor; d. The proposed use provides for the provision of affordable housing; e. The proposed use provides for development or redevelopment in an area that is characterized by other similar development and where a land use plan amendment and rezoning would result in a spot land use or zoning designation; or f. The proposed use provides for the development of a new and /or preservation of a working waterfront use. 6. Flexibility with regard to use, lot width, required setbacks, height and off - street X parking are justified based on demonstrated compliance with all of the following design objectives: a. The proposed development will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of the surrounding properties for uses permitted in this zoning district; b. The proposed development complies with applicable design guidelines adopted by the City; a The design, scale and intensity of the proposed development supports the established or emerging character of an area; d. In order to form a cohesive, visually interesting and attractive appearance, the proposed development incorporates a substantial number of the following design elements: ❑ Changes in horizontal building planes; ❑ Use of architectural details such as columns, cornices, stringcourses, pilasters, porticos, balconies, railings, awnings, etc.; ❑ Variety in materials, colors and textures; ❑ Distinctive fenestration patterns; • Building stepbacks; and • Distinctive roofs forms. e. The proposed development provides for appropriate buffers, enhanced landscape design and appropriate distances between buildings. Community Development Board — September 16, 2008 FLD2008 -07021 — Page 5 COMPLIANCE WITH GENERAL STANDARDS FOR LEVEL TWO APPROVALS: The following table depicts the consistency of the development proposal with the General Standards for Level Two Approvals as per CDC Section 3- 913.A: SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION: The Development Review Committee (DRC) reviewed the application and supporting materials at its meeting of August 7, 2008, and deemed the development proposal to be legally sufficient to move forward to the Community Development Board (CDB). Findings of Fact. The Planning Department, having reviewed all evidence submitted by the applicant and requirements of the Community Development Code, finds that there is substantial competent evidence to support the following findings of fact: 1. That the 1.11 acre subject property is located on the west side of Missouri Avenue, approximately 200 feet south of Lakeview Road; 2. That the subject property is located within the Commercial (C) District and the Commercial General (CG) Future Land Use Plan category and will consist of a 16,374 square foot medical clinic and associated off - street parking lots and solid waste facility; 3. That the existing building and off - street parking lot encroach into the required setbacks for the Commercial (C) District, and the proposed modifications will substantially reduce these existing nonconformities; and 4. That the prior retail sales and service use of the property did not meet the minimum off - street parking requirement, and that the proposed modifications and change of use will bring the site into compliance with off - street parking requirements. Conclusions of Law. The Planning Department, having made the above findings of fact, reaches the following conclusions of law: 1. That the development proposal has been found to be in compliance with the Maximum Development Potential standards as per CDC Section 2- 701.1; 2. That the development proposal has been found to be in compliance with the applicable Standards and Criteria as per CDC Section 2 -704; 3. That the development proposal has been found to be in compliance with the Flexibility criteria for a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project as per CDC Section 2- 704.C; and 4. That the development proposal has been found to be in compliance with the General Standards for Level Two Approvals as per CDC Section 3- 913.A. Community Development Board — September 16, 2008 FLD2008 -07021 — Page 6 Consistent Inconsistent 1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, X coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage development and use of X adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons X residing or working in the neighborhood. 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. X 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the X immediate vicinity. 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including X visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts on adjacent properties. SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION: The Development Review Committee (DRC) reviewed the application and supporting materials at its meeting of August 7, 2008, and deemed the development proposal to be legally sufficient to move forward to the Community Development Board (CDB). Findings of Fact. The Planning Department, having reviewed all evidence submitted by the applicant and requirements of the Community Development Code, finds that there is substantial competent evidence to support the following findings of fact: 1. That the 1.11 acre subject property is located on the west side of Missouri Avenue, approximately 200 feet south of Lakeview Road; 2. That the subject property is located within the Commercial (C) District and the Commercial General (CG) Future Land Use Plan category and will consist of a 16,374 square foot medical clinic and associated off - street parking lots and solid waste facility; 3. That the existing building and off - street parking lot encroach into the required setbacks for the Commercial (C) District, and the proposed modifications will substantially reduce these existing nonconformities; and 4. That the prior retail sales and service use of the property did not meet the minimum off - street parking requirement, and that the proposed modifications and change of use will bring the site into compliance with off - street parking requirements. Conclusions of Law. The Planning Department, having made the above findings of fact, reaches the following conclusions of law: 1. That the development proposal has been found to be in compliance with the Maximum Development Potential standards as per CDC Section 2- 701.1; 2. That the development proposal has been found to be in compliance with the applicable Standards and Criteria as per CDC Section 2 -704; 3. That the development proposal has been found to be in compliance with the Flexibility criteria for a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project as per CDC Section 2- 704.C; and 4. That the development proposal has been found to be in compliance with the General Standards for Level Two Approvals as per CDC Section 3- 913.A. Community Development Board — September 16, 2008 FLD2008 -07021 — Page 6 • ! Based upon the above, the Planning Department recommends APPROVAL of the Flexible Development application for a medical clinic within the Commercial (C) District with a lot area of 48,320 square feet, a lot width of 512 feet, a building height of 25 feet, front (east) setbacks of 9.58 feet (to building) and 11 feet (to parking), side (north) setbacks of 149 feet (to building) and 10 feet (to parking), side (south) setbacks of 116 feet (to building) and 5.99 feet (to parking), rear (west) setbacks of 4.47 feet (to building) and 2.5 feet (to parking), with 47 off - street parking spaces as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project as per Community Development Code Section 2 -704.0 with the following conditions: Conditions of Approval: 1. That prior to the issuance of any building permits, any outstanding comments of the Engineering Department shall be addressed; 2. That prior to issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy, all on -site utility facilities, whether they be existing or proposed, are to be placed underground as part of the redevelopment of the site; 3. That any /all wireless communication facilities to be installed concurrent with or subsequent to the construction of the subject development must be screened from view and/or painted to match the building to which they are attached, as applicable; 4. That any /all future signage must meet the requirements of Code and be architecturally integrated with the design of the building with regard to proportion, color, material and finish as part of a final sign package submitted to and approved by Staff prior to the issuance of any permits which includes: (a) All signs fully dimensioned and coordinated in terms of including the same color and font style and size; and (b) All signs be constructed of the highest quality materials which are coordinated with the colors, materials and architectural style of the building; and 5. That the final design and color of the building shall be consistent with the architectural elevations submitted to (or as modified by) the CDB, and be approved by Staff. Prepared by Planning Department Staff: Robert G. Tefft, Development Review Manager ATTACHMENTS: Location Map; Aerial Map; Zoning Map; Existing Surrounding Uses Map; and Photographs S: (Planning Departmen6C D BIFLEX (FLD)IPending cases)Up for the next CDBIMissouri Ave S 1314 Florida Pain Mgmt (C) 2008 09 -16 R71Missouri Ave S 1314 - Staff Report 2008 09-16-doe Community Development Board — September 16, 2008 FLD2008 -07021 — Page 7 0 0 Robert G. Tefft 100 South Myrtle Avenue, Clearwater, Florida 33756 Phone: (727) .562 -45391 Email: rob ert.tefftAmyclearwater.com PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE ■ Development Review Manager City of Clearwater, Clearwater, Florida August 2008 to Present Direct Development Review activities for the City. Supervise professional planners, land resource specialists and administrative staff. Conduct performance reviews. Serve as staff to the Community Development Board. ■ Planner III City of Clearwater, Clearwater, Florida June 2005 to August 2008 Duties include performing technical review of and preparation of staff reports for various land development applications, the organization of data and its display in order to track information and provide status reports, and making presentations to various City Boards and Committees. ■ Planner II City of Clearwater, Clearwater, Florida May 2005 to June 2005 Duties include performing technical review of and preparation of staff reports for various land development applications, the organization of data and its display in order to track information and provide status reports. ■ Senior Planner City of Delray Beach, Delray Beach, Florida October 2003 to May 2005 Performed technical review of and prepared staff reports for land development applications such as, but not limited to: site plans, conditional uses, rezonings, land use amendments, and text amendments. Organized data and its display in order to track information and provide status reports. Make presentations to various City Boards. Planner City of Delray Beach, Delray Beach, Florida March 2001 to October 2003 Performed technical review of and prepared staff reports for land development applications such as, but not limited to: site plans, conditional use and text amendments. Organization of data and its display in order to track information and provide status reports. Provided in -depth training to the Assistant Planner position with respect to essential job functions and continuous guidance. Assistant Planner City of Delray Beach, Delray Beach, Florida October 1999 to March 2001 Performed technical review of and prepared staff reports for site plan development applications. Performed reviews of building permit applications. Provided information on land use applications, ordinances, land development regulations, codes, and related planning programs /services to other professionals and the public. EDUCATION ■ Bachelor of Arts, Geography (Urban Studies), University of South Florida, 1999 ASSOCIATION MEMBERSHIP ■ American Planning Association Community Development Board — September 16, 2008 FLD2008 -07021 — Page 8 1� • Pinks TU skavwi I I a LIJ 0 > � LAKEVIEW i ry d W J _ Li LLj . _ Q > SO UT H ST � D C7 O D J I- PROJECT z O < Z SITE 0 w 7 (KINGSLIEY ST d LU) QUEEN ST QUEEN LOCATION MAP Owner: George Harrison Realty Co. Case: FLD2008 -07021 Site: 1314 South Missouri Avenue Property Size: 1.14 acres PIN: 22- 29 -15- 48978 - 005 -0170 Atlas Page: 306A • 0 Owner: George Harrison Realty Co Site: 1314 South Missouri Avenue PIN: 22- 29 -15- 48978 - 005 -0170 t AERIAL MAP :a;r: FLD2CC8 -07021 'row/ Size: 1.14 acres AtL E P-ge: 306A n 3� 48978 1 S& 13532 1355 ^1 2 ^ ^3-1 1304 355 1352 23 1354 22 1358 1306 1309 5 15 1308 1313 8 1312 16 1315 1314 1317 7 1316 17 1319 1318 1321 8 1320 16 1323 1322 1325 C 1324 19 1327 1326 1329 1331 10— 20 1330 1333 11 — — 21 1335 24 133912 22 1334 23 1338 ii - 14 24 ^ 1344 3� 48978 1 S& 13532 1355 J 13419 24 1348 355 1352 23 1354 22 1358 3 1364 21 1360 Ll — _ 1362 5 20 1364 19 1370 13669 1371 137 18 1374 17 1378 1389 g 1325 • • I 514A2 ^ ^ 1 24 13532 1355 23 1352 22 — 21 1 1364 T�14 5 — ,J7�y, /( R 1308 1313 3'y �S 16 17 1314 6 13177 13218 18 1320 130 1322 g 1325 t9 1324 1326 1320 1328 20 1330 133311 21 1334 1337 12 22 1336 13 337 23 1340 134514 24 1344 ^ 1 24 13532 1355 23 1352 22 — 21 1 1364 IVY ` 5 — 20 1366 191368 1373 3757 1372 18 1377 13796 1376 17 1378 100 1 ,299 ZONING MAP Owner: George Harrison Realty Co. Case: FLD2008 -07021 Site: 1314 South Missouri Avenue Property Size: 1.14 acres I PIN: 22- 29 -15- 48978 - 005 -0170 Atlas Page: 306A .o m u� 130 :.:.:.: •,: .:.. ::•...... •. t� 10 •..::•;:'.::.;� .N- 50 1307 ;;;::_:: � 1 2 3 57 58 1309 15 1310 6 16 i::•; _•'.: •::'. 4 1309 1315 : •:.;.:.•� "' " " — — — W 13177 17 5 1310 — — 1319 — 6 1314 Q 8 18 1323 —7_ — _ 131Z — Q 9 13 1 : •,':;: -:.••p :; :'.; 8 1327 :: "^:.•;`•"::'. -: 1318 — — — 20 �=•`•��:� : -:� 9 1320 — — — 1319 5 V 1329 _ _ :(, ._::....;tos3':•:•.� :•_:: 2 vi 13331 1335 21 :.�.- %.::::::;•..: @335:.: 35532 Q 1332 1339 '::; ...::.... •. - ..1:37 -;; p + 1325 134¢3 1343 23 1340 8 _ _ 1327 _4 134 24 C 14 8 134p _ — - - — — — 1 (+j cV I 9 15 — 1330 1329 4 1349 110 1331 -- -- - -- - 1 24 5 17 - — 1350 11 18 13 - 4 1353 23 1354 — 1339 41 3 22 136n2 — — — — — 1359 _ 20 1340 1364 21 13 21— 1343 3 1W _ _ 136 0 — 1365 — — — 13655 J 201364 14 22 — — 1U5 38 — — 23 13 g 1369 19 — - - — 15 & 49 36 137 18 1371 _ 148 1351 — 35 — — — •137 16 8 17 1 1 ZONING MAP Owner: George Harrison Realty Co. Case: FLD2008 -07021 Site: 1314 South Missouri Avenue Property Size: 1.14 acres I PIN: 22- 29 -15- 48978 - 005 -0170 Atlas Page: 306A 0 • n 100 EDUCATIONAL RETAII. z FACILITY IR91 SALES 1�9SERVIC S 514D2 9✓(s1 60 O Oi r M M n 1 2 3 1104 h n ^ ^ . IF306 1309 ... . 13115 15 1308 1313 1312 13156 s 1314 1317 1316 13197 n 1318 1321 a 1320 1323 1a 1322 1325 C 1324 1317 191326 1329 ED a 133110_ 201330 • .....: . .•.:'i:i: — 133511 21 133912 221334 23 1338 1a 1320 Q is 14 —7— — — 1 132 1 24 1344 60 O Oi r M M n n 6 300 ° 60 h h n ^ ^ . M h 1 130 r ... . .:.. ua.::•:::: 21 1364 sa zo ....::•:•::...F:.::: n ^ N N s 3 5 57 58 13136 — 1 151308 1 1301`) 1 15 r a 4 to 4 21 ETA E ED a W 1 ':;;. _:: • • .....: . .•.:'i:i: — H I 1309 — — a 131 1 132 1 1a 1320 Q a , 1317 — —7— — — 1 132 1 ,s1324 Q s 1 _ — 10 1 — s —132 1 Iff 133' 2 21 1334 t 1335 2 — 1j"`E'Tifl H 133 7 — — �' :::::::;: :::•: 12 22 13i 1336 3 .;:::::;.: •:::::::: Q 1339 _ i:i: %:.i' ::i•.'::13 %il O 133Y _ 231340 1134435 134 CO) 134 i4 241344 1347 24 a 48978 J SOUTH ST 1349 — — Q 1a s y J- - 139 z4 1348 1355 23 1354 3 — 13611 — _ 5 22 135 21 1360 1362 20 1364 1369 1* 1377 19 1370 18 1374 13,79 t7 1378 5 — — 1 24 135 15_1330 1 52 WnL IGS 1361 — � 1361 21 1364 5 zo 1/368 1373 1379 18 1372 1374 137a 1376 17 1379 1 1378 5 — — — 1327 4 13294 133.L — — 1335 4 1339 41 1343 3 10 15_1330 1 24 135 Q _ — — 1145 38 — � 135:1 23 y „ _ 13_54 3 1359 1369 22 h 13 1361 21 13163— _ 1360 1365 13s�s jiff E AN UU I Al SA 14 136 & S IVICES 15 1375 18 1371 - - — — 1137 1s 8 17 5 — +?*-I —' Q 0 1327 4 13294 133.L — — 1335 4 1339 41 1343 3 _ _ 14 >28 15_1330 — — — 17 18 1 -19 - - 20 1340 z1- - z3 134 1145 38 — � s M '�34 135135 EXISTING SURROUNDING USES MAP Owner: George Harrison Realty Co. I Case: FLD2008 -07021 Site: 1314 South Missouri Avenue I PIN: 22- 29 -15- 48978 - 005 -0170 Property Size: 1.14 acres Atlas Page: 306A 0 0 Looking south along Missouri Avenue toward subject property subject property toward existing building F 6PY Loo ing nort rom north property line toward adjacent property Looking north along Missouri Aven ae toward subject property ,- property property 1314 S. Missouri Avenue FLD2008 -07021 0 2379 Broad Street, Brooksville. Florida 34504.6899 Southwest Mori& t - •(352) 796 -7211 or 1- 800-423 -1476 (FL only) Mater- laaageinent District 6284150 7DD 1-800-231-6103 only) f SUNCOM only (FL On the Internet at: WaterMatters.org Bartow Service Office Lecanto Service Office Sarasota Service Office Tampa Service Office iw , A r fc r :a!7>+;tiss 1.70 Century Boulevard Suno 226 6750 Frurtvllle Road 7601 Highway 301 North Bartow, Florida 33830 -1700 3600 Wes'. Sovereign Path Sarasota, Flonda 34240 -9711 Tampa. Florida 33637.6759 (863) 534 -1448 or Lecanto. Florida 34461 -8070 (941)377.3722 or (818) 985.7481 or 1-800-492-7862 (FL only} (352) 5273131 i -WO. 320.3503 (FL only) 1.80"36-0791 (FL only) SUNCOM 572.6200 SUNCOM 667-3271 SU;400W,.531.6900 SUNCOM 57$.2070 JULY 15, 2008 GEORGE C HARRISON REALTY GROUP MO_ S MISSOURI AVE CLEARWATER, FL 33756 -0000 t Nell Combee SUBJECT, .,- ENVIRONMENTAL .RESOURCE PERMIT Chair. Polk APPLICATION .NQ. 46- 034276.000. Todd Pressman. PROJECT.- FLORIDA PAIN MANAGEMENT CLWTR OFFICE Vice Chair; Pinellas APPLICANT REFERENCE N0. NOT SPECIFIED 7 Jennifer E. Closshey Secretary. Hilsborough On JULY 01, 2008, your above application was received. Ronald E.Oakley please use this number in all correspondence. With-in 30 days of p Yi?auCer. Pastn 5 receipt of your application you will receive a request for Bryan K. Beswick Desoto additional_ .information or a notice stating your application is Patricia M. Glass complete.. 'Manatee Hugh M. Gra;nling Please be aware of choices • you have in order to address any ; Hillsborough disagreements that may arise during the permitting process. If a Albert Co.Joergor regulation- related, disagreement occurs between an applicant and s`"`°ta a district staff member which cannot be.'resolved at staff level, Saline Parks the applicant should 1) Appeal "the contested .issues: by meeting Pinellas with the staff member's manager. If a resolution is not reached, MartizaRavtra•Forino Hillsborough the, applicant should 2) Seek ,a meeting with the Regulation Department Director. If a resolution is not reached, the H. Paul Senft,Jr. Polls applicant should 3) Seek to meet with the Deputy Executive Judith C. Whitehead Director of Regulation and the Technical. Services Director. If a fi Hernando resolution is not reached, -the applicant should 4) Seek: a meeting , ' with the Executive Director. The only requirement is that the process must be followed sequentially. Executive Director please contact our TAMPA REGULATORY DEPARTMENT at i William S.BUenky 985 -7481 or 1- 800 - 836 =0797 (Florida only.) if you have any 1 General Counsel questions regarding the evaluation of your application. Sincerely, (SIGNED) ANTOINETTE SEAMAN RECORDS AND DATA DEPARTMENT CC: WATERFIELD DESIGN GROUP INC 4340 S MANHATTAN AVE TAMPA, FL 33611 -0000 a 0 • GULF COAST TESTING LABORATORY, INC. 5745 PARK BOULEVARD PINELLAS PARK, FL 33781 CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS ENGINEERING COUNCIL CERTIFIED CERTIFIACT E of AUTHORIZATION # 00002370 INFILTRA TION RATE OF SOILS IN FIELD USING DOUBLE RING INFIL TR OME TER CLIENT: Dr. Kazi Hassan PROJECT: 1314 S Missouri Avenue, Clearwater, Florida DATE TESTED: 6/25/08 LOCATION OF TEST: Test #1, 21' W x Y N of NE Corner of North Most Building Section DEPTH TO EXISTING WATER TABLE: 9'2" Below the Existing Ground Surface ESTIMATED SEASONAL HIGH WATER LEVEL: 61t Below the Existing Ground Surface REMARKS: WATER TEMP: 82 deg. F WATER pH: 7.99 •= INNER RING READINGS 33.0 32.0 31.0 30.0 29.0 28.0 27.0 26.0 25.0 24.0 INCH PER HOUR .5 1 2 3 4 5 Elapsed Time (Hours) ,j0 F1LrfRQ,iTION RATE = 27.9 INCHES / HR. I N F I L T R A T I O N R A T E PHONE: (727) 544 -4080 FAX: (727) 544 -7532 LAB NO: 15262 DATE REPORTED: 6/26/08 SOIL PROFILE Depth CLASSIFICATION in feet. (EXISTING SURFACE APPROX. ELEV.) Gray SAND w/ Glass, Metal & 0' 5" Occasional Roots, 10YR 511 2' 4" Gray SAND, I OYR 6/1 3' 0" Light Gray SAND, IOYR 7/1 Dark Yellowish Brown SAND w/ 3'5" Trace Roots, I OYR 4/4 Very Pale Brown SAND, 4' 2" 2.5 Y R 7/3 White SAND w/ Trace of Roots, 10YR 8/1 91311 Black SAND w/ Organic Stain & 10' 0" Occasional Roots, l OYR 2/1 Hole Terminated at 120" •' re �r� Ground level ..._...........: Su It + _: 12" Inner 1/8" 1/4 TEST Depth �2'-0 ring / - -- belo_w-Existin>? Grade - - - - i' '' .......__.. _......_ .................._.... . — j I 6 "water Test Elevation 1 " -- y `- ..__..... ._ - a ^ ` ring set .. T 2- 4 . 24" Outer ring This report is the property of the Client listed and cannot be copied or reproduced without written permission of the Client or GCTL. b. M� i • GULF COAST TESTING LABORATORY, INC. 5745 PARK BOULEVARD PINELLAS PARK, FL 33781 CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS ENGINEERING COUNCIL CERTIFIED CERTIFIACTE oJAUTHORl7_AT /ON # 00002370 PHONE: (727) 544 -4080 FAX.- (727) 544 -7532 INFILTRA TION RATE OF SOILS IN FIELD USING DOUBLE RING INFIL TR OME TER CLIENT: Dr. Kazi Hassan LAB NO: 15262 PROJECT: 1314 S Missouri Avenue, Clearwater, Florida DATE REPORTED: 6/27/08 DATE TESTED: 6/27/08 LOCATION OF TEST: Test #2, 35' E x 27' S of NE Corner of North Most Building Section DEPTH TO EXISTING WATER TABLE: 8' 1" Below the Existing Ground Surface ESTIMATED SEASONAL HIGH WATER LEVEL: Approx. 5' 6" Below the Existing Ground Surface REMARKS: This DRI test location is approximately 12" lower in elevation than DRI Test #1 location. As per Client's rep., this DRI test location was moved to the east side of the existing loading dock area. WATER TEMP: 81 deg. F WATER pH: 7.99 •= INNER RING READINGS SOIL PROFILE 30.0 29.0 28.0 27.0 26.0 25.0 24.0 23.0 22.0 21.0 20.0 INCH _rf - -5:. 1 2 3 4 5 PER,..;"+�!>i +! +��r��• Elapsed Time (Hours) A�[ON RATE = 23.4 INCHES / HR. 0 I N F I L T R A T I O N R A T E ' �ibm Ground level Wal File at y r rte. -7 . • �isan 2 +0000 ., cJi� Agn Gro p 1 1 pd ' TEST Depth Y -0° below_ Existing.... rade - == - - -- Test Elevation l Depth In feet. CLASSIFICATION (EXISTING SURFACE APPROX. ELEV.) 0' 3" Asphalt 1'4" Very Pal Brown SAND w/ She]] (Base), 10YR 7/3 2' 0" Light Gray SAND, 1 OYR 7/1 2' 10" Dark Brown SAND, 7.5YR 4/2 4' 5" Light Gray SAND, 1 OYR 7/2 8' S" White SAND, I OYR 8/1 9' 2" Light Brownish Gray SAND, l OYR 6/2 10,011 Black SAND, 1 OYR 2/1 Hole Terminated at 120" This report is the property of the Client listed and cannot be copied or reproduced without written permission of the Client or GCTL. t • • GULF COAST TESTING LABORATORY, INC. 5745 PARK BOULEVARD PINELLAS PARK, FL 33781 CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS ENGINEERING COUNCIL CERTIFIED CERT /FIACTE of A UTHORIZAT /ON # 00002370 CLIENT: Dr. Kazi Hassan PROJECT: 1314 S Missouri Avenue, Clearwater, Florida DATE TESTED: 6/25/08 LOCATION OF TEST: Test #1, 21'W x 3'N of NE Corner of North Most Building Section DEPTH TO EXISTING WATER TABLE: 9'2" Below the Existing Ground Surface ESTIMATED SEASONAL HIGH WATER LEVEL: 6'f Below the Existing Ground Surface REMARKS: WATER TEMP: 82 deg. F WATER pH: 7.99 A— UNTT,TF'D DM1t -Z D r A rii Kirc INCH .5 1 2 3 4 5 6 PER Elapsed Time (Hours) HOUR INFILTRATION RATE= 27.9 INCHES/HR. Respectfully Submitted, 1 Ground level R. Gunasekaran, P.E. Fla. License No. 20402 cc: Dr. Kazi Hassan 2 Waterfield Design Group 1 File 1 NNE TEST Depth 2'-0" below ExTStmQ Grade y N Test Elevation PHONE: (727) 544 -4080 FAX: (727) 544 -7532 LAB NO: 15262 DATE REPORTED: 6/26/08 SOIL PROFILE Depth CLASSIFICATION In feet. (EXISTING SURFACE APPROX. ELEV.) Gray SAND w/ Glass, Metal & 0" Occasional Roots, lOYR 5/1 White SAND w/ Trace of Roots, 10YR 8/1 Black SAND w/ Organic Stain & i0';0 "fps Occasional Roots, IOYR 2/1 All Hole Terminated at 120" .... .............. _........... ............................... Gray SAND, l OYR 6/1 Light Gray SAND, l OYR 7/1 Dark Yellowish Brown SAND w/ 35' , Trace Roots, IOYR 4/4 Very Pale Brown SAND, y 2.5YR 7/3 White SAND w/ Trace of Roots, 10YR 8/1 Black SAND w/ Organic Stain & i0';0 "fps Occasional Roots, IOYR 2/1 All Hole Terminated at 120" .... .............. _........... ............................... 12" Inner 1/8 1/4 ring vp 6 water 6 nng set � 'x 24" Outer ring This report is the property of the Client listed and cannot be copied or reproduced without written permission of the Client or GCTL. 0 GULF COAST TESTING LABORATORY, INC. 5745 PARK BOULEVARD PINELLAS PARK, FL 33781 CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS ENGINEERING COUNCIL CERTIFIED CERTIFIACTE of A UTHORIZA TION 0 00002370 PHONE: (727) 544 -4080 FAX: (727) 544 -7532 CLIENT: Dr. Kazi Hassan LAB NO: 15262 PROJECT: 1314 S Missouri Avenue, Clearwater, Florida DATE REPORTED: 6/27/08 DATE TESTED: 6/27/08 LOCATION OF TEST: Test #2, 35' E x 27' S of NE Corner of North Most Building Section DEPTH TO EXISTING WATER TABLE: 8' 1" Below the Existing Ground Surface ESTIMATED SEASONAL HIGH WATER LEVEL: Approx. 5'6" Below the Existing Ground Surface REMARKS: This DRI test location is approximately 12" lower in elevation than DRI Test #1 location. As per Client's rep., this DRI test location was moved to the east side of the existing loading dock area. WATER TEMP: 81 deg. F WATER pH: 7.99 A— Tl-,Wrl? VINTr: uFAnrnrnc SOIL PROFILE 30.0 29.0 28.0 27.0 26.0 25.0 24.0 23.0 22.0 21.0 INCH .5 1 2 3 4 5 6 PER Elapsed Time (Hours) HOUR INFILTRATION RATE = 23.4 INCHES / HR. Respectfully Submitted, 1 Ground level R. Gunasekaran, P.E. Fla. License No. 20402 cc: Dr. Kazi Hassan 2 Waterfield Design Group 1 File 1 TEST Depth Y -0" below Extstin t6i de AM Test Elevation Depth CLASSIFICATION in feet. (EXISTING SURFACE APPROX. ELEV.) 10YR 7/2 X White SAND, IOYR 8/1 Light Brownish Gray SAND, 9 2' 10YR 6/2 10 4" Black SAND, l OYR 2/1 Hole Terminated at 120" 12" Inner 1/8" 1/4" ring - P. 6 water -- - - -- . ` 6 ring set 24" 24" Outer ring This report is the property of the Client listed and cannot be copied or reproduced without written permission of the Client or GCTL. Very Pal Brown SAND w/ Shell r� (Base), IOYR 7/3 Light Gray SAND, I OYR 7/1 Dark Brown SAND, 7.5YR 4/2 10YR 7/2 X White SAND, IOYR 8/1 Light Brownish Gray SAND, 9 2' 10YR 6/2 10 4" Black SAND, l OYR 2/1 Hole Terminated at 120" 12" Inner 1/8" 1/4" ring - P. 6 water -- - - -- . ` 6 ring set 24" 24" Outer ring This report is the property of the Client listed and cannot be copied or reproduced without written permission of the Client or GCTL. Gulf Coast Testing Laboratory, Inc. Lab #15262 6/25/08 1314 S Missouri Avenue, Clearwater, FL DRI Test Locations 0 DRAINAGE REPORT Prepared for Pain Management 1314 South Missouri Avenue Clearwater, Florida -54tr,mwcJA Submitted to the Clearwater Planning Department Flexible Development Application Prepared by: CRAIG R. MILLER, P. E. No. 62325 The Waterfietd Design Group, Inc. WATERFIELD DESIGN GROUP, ;NO. - S. MANHATTAN AVE. TAM TAM ' 4340 South Manhattan Avenue � PA, FL 33611 PHONE: (873) 839 -5700 Tampa, FL 33611 ©G o Y, . y Iry C>1 G.. .. July 1, 2008 TABLE OF CONTENTS PURPOSE........................................................................ ............................... I SITEDESCRIPTION ........................................................... ..............................I EXISTINGCONDITIONS .................................................... ..............................2 PROPOSED DESIGN ........................................................... ..............................2 RATIONAL............................... m....................................... ..............................3 CALCULATIONS............................................................... ..............................3 CONCLUSION................................................................... ..............................3 EXISTING CONDITIONS SHEET .......................................... ..............................5 PROPOSED CONDITIONS SHEET ........................................ ..............................6 HYDROCAD CALCULATIONS ............................................ ...........................7 -38 ' 7i1►1i]il ZONE 6 RAINFALL IDF CURVES F -2 OVERLAND FLOW VELOCITIES FOR VARIOUS LAND USE TYPES t ki Xl L•; P Purpose PROJECT NARRATIVE The Applicant is proposing to redevelop approximately one -third of the existing site. The Applicant is proposing to remove the northern one -third of the existing building and the loading dock and replace them with proposed parking, landscaping, and a dry detention basin. The purpose of this report is to model the exiting peak flows emanating from the limits of the redeveloped area and compare these exiting peak flows to those calculated for the proposed redevelopment to this same area. Site Description The project site is an approximately 48,319 SF lot bounded by South Missouri Avenue to the east, private commercial properties to the north and south, and private residential properties to the west. The site is currently utilized as for commercial purposes. The site consists of an attached 19.5' and 13.0' high structure with a footprint of 25,568 SF, a parking lobo the south, a paved area to the east for access, and a paved loading dock to the north. Infiltration rate of soils in the field were determined using a double ring infiltrometer. These tests were conducted by Gulf Coast Testing Laboratory, Inc, 5745 Park Boulevard, Pinellas Park, FL 33781. Test #1 located 21' west and 3' north of the existing northeast building corner revealed the following: 0' 5" Gray Sand 2'4" Gray Sand 3'0" Light Gray Sand 3'5" Dark Yellowish Brown Sand 4'2" Very Pale Brown Sand 9'3" White Sand 10'0" Black Sand Existing water table: 9'2" Estimated Seasonal High Water Level: 6'± Infiltration Rate: 27.9 inches /hr. Test #2 located 35' east and 27' south of the existing northeast building corner revealed the following: 0' 3" Asphalt Z -2! 1'4" Very Pale Brown Sand' 2'0" Light Gray Sand4 2'10" Dark Brown Sand 4'5" Light Gray Sand i {® ,f .:� cQ 8'5" White Sand C.) 9'2" Light Brownish Gray' y 3 s F. hp A.�� 1 10'0" Black Sand Existing water table: 8'1" Estimated Seasonal High Water Level: 5'6" Infiltration Rate: 23.4 inches/hr. Existing Conditions (See Existing Conditions Sheet) The majority of the site slopes gently downward from southeast to northwest across the site and, ultimately, to the westerly abutters' properties. There is an existing low spot in the southern parking area where the majority of the flow from the southern portion of the property leaves the site. The building storm drains currently exit to downspouts or through sheet flow at the rear of the property and flow onto the westerly abutters' properties. The paved access way in front of the site slopes onto South Missouri Avenue. There is an existing state owned catch basin along South Missouri Avenue. This catch basin collects the overland flow from the existing paved access area. The stormwater from the northern loading dock flows north and onto abutters' properties. There are no wetlands present on site. The site is not contributing to an existing flooding problem. Proposed Design (See Proposed Conditions Sheet) The northern one -third of the existing building will be removed and replaced with parking, landscaping and a dry detention pond. A strip of asphalt to the east of the existing building will be replaced with landscaping. The southern parking area will remain predominately the same with some paving being removed and replaced with landscaping. Because the modifications to this area are so minor it was not considered in the redevelopment calculations. Proposed drainage at the site will follow existing flow patterns in the southern portion and new flow patterns in the northern portion. In the redeveloped northern portion, stormwater will be the collected from proposed parking area and from the 13.0' high, 7,559 SF portion of the remaining building. Although it is not necessary to retain the stormwater runoff from the existing building a portion is proposed to be tied into the detention pond to help mitigate the overall runoff from the site. These areas will flow into 1,937 cubic feet proposed dry detention pond. The detention basin has been sized to accommodate flows associated with storm frequencies up to and including the 25 -year storm event as required in Section 1 of the City of Clearwater's Storm Drainage Design Criteria (SDDC) for detention ponds with outfalls. Test #1's infiltration rate was used in the design of the detention pond as it was the closest to the proposed detention pond location. Soil testing was not possible in the center of the proposed detention pond since the building currently occupies that location. l The proposed parking area will be graded to flow towards the northwest corner of the site. The stormwater from the parking area will enter the pond from a catch basin in the northwest corner �1 of the parking area. The stormwater will flow from the catch basin to the pond through a 10" r { V reinforced concrete pipe. The existing building downspouts will be connected to underground 4" q: u'a PVC pipe which will direct the flow to the detention pond. The outlet of both the catch basin U outlet and the storm drain outlet will flow through a pipe end flare and treatment. The stormwater U4 I CM p 1 a� G retained in the pond will exit the site through ground infiltration and a 15" diameter RCP outfall to the existing storm sewer along South Missouri Avenue. Rational The runoff calculations use the Rational Method, with the Zone 6 Rainfall Intensity- Duration- Frequency Curves to depict pre- development and post - development peak design flows as recommended in Section 8 of the SDDC. Given the relatively small subcatchments on the site and that the SDDC in Section 2 requires the use of the F -2 Overland Velocities for Various Land Use Types chart with a minimum time of concentration of 15 minutes, a time of concentration of 15 minutes was assumed for most of the site. Existing, pre - development runoff calculations used a Weighted Coefficient of Runoff of 1/2 the actual C value as allowed by the City of Clearwater as defined on the table in Section 8 of the SDDC for sites undergoing redevelopment and not contributing to an existing flooding problem. The 25 -year storm event was used for the design frequency to determine peak runoff flows as required by the SDDC in Section 1 for channels and detention areas with outfalls. The proposed detention area has a proposed outfall that connects to the existing storm sewer under South Missouri Avenue. A minimum storm duration of 60 minutes is required according to SDDC Section 8. According to the Zone 6 IDF curve chart the intensity for a 25 year storm using the Rational Method with a Duration of 60 minutes is 3.70 in/hr. Calculations HydroCAD calculations are provided for the existing and proposed conditions on site. These calculations demonstrate that the new flow patterns allow for less flow to leave the site in the redeveloped areas during the 25 -year storm than the existing conditions. The calculations also show that through infiltration the dry detention pond will drain out within 24 hours or less of the end of the 25 -year storm event. As can be seen in the proposed calculations, the dry detention pond has been modeled so that the peak elevation for the 25 -year storm event will reach 61.0 with the top of bank being 62.0, therefore there will be 1.0' of freeboard during the 25 -year storm event which is greater than the 6" of freeboard required in SDDC Section 8. This demonstrates that the detention pond can handle the volume of runoff generated by 25 -year storm without increasing offsite runoff. Separate HydroCAD calculations are provided for the treatment volume to demonstrate the system's ability to detain the first half an inch of runoff from the portion of the site undergoing redevelopment for the duration of the storm event as required by SDDC Section 8. Conclusion Using Weighted Coefficient of Runoff allowed by the SDDC for pre - development conditions 9 redevelopment of the 48,319 SF lot will result in higher runoff concentration over the_ predevelopment conditions. By using the proposed on -site dry detention area the pres'm6& additional flow generated from redevelopment will be mitigated on site during the 25 ayear_'Is xn. Flow off -site from the redeveloped area is decreased in comparison to existing conditioiis:through E� e . e the use of a dry detention pond with infiltration. The detention pond is designed to retain through infiltration 0.80 cfs of the 1.48 cfs flow that enters the pond during the 25 -year storm event. The other 0.68 cfs exits the pond through the outfall control structure and connects to the existing state storm sewer system. This is less than the 0.73 cfs that currently flows from the same areas during existing conditions. Therefore, all new runoff from the proposed redevelopment will be mitigated on site. This is shown in the HydroCAD calculations below. A summary of flow rates for the entire property are as follows: Note: Existing Condition and Proposed Southern Residential Properties flow rates were calculated using the SDDC Modified Weighted Coefficient of Runoff. Existing Conditions Peak Discharge Rates — ft'/sec 25 -Year Storm Investigation Point 1- Northern Residential Properties 0.42 Investigation Point 2- South Missouri Avenue 0.21 Investigation Point 3- Southern Residential Properties 1.32 TOTALS 1.95 Post-development Peak Discharge Rates — ft /sec 25 -Year Storm Investigation Point 1- South Missouri Avenue 0.78 Investigation Point 2- Southern Residential Properties 1.01 TOTALS 1.79 t. - Z cm ms C\2 c 9 r . L • LEGEND: 6 Sheet D.1 ... d ---- - - - - -- TIME OF CONCENTRATION PATH W 0) o o EXISTING OVERLAND FLOW PATH % = ^^ 0 37a AREA DRAINING SOUTH RESIDENTIAL AREA DRAINING TO SOUTH MISSOURI AVENUE AREA GRAINING NORTH RESIDENTIAL N x W 6 Sheet D.1 0 0 LEGEND: ---------- ...... .... TIME OF CONCENTRATION PATH cn INVESTIGATION POINT #2 ........ ...... ..... . .... <a. . k- ............. ....... .. ... . ... ... .... .. ...... ..... . .... ........ ............ ... ....... o! AREA DRAINING TO SOUTH MISSOURI AVENUE 1 K�7 o AREA DRAINING NORTH RESIDENTIAL 7 LEGEND: ---------- ...... .... TIME OF CONCENTRATION PATH cn EXISTING OVERLAND FLOW PATH OW so AREA DRAINING SOUTH RESIDENTIAL AREA DRAINING TO SOUTH MISSOURI AVENUE o AREA DRAINING NORTH RESIDENTIAL Sheet D.2 x 1S Existing Building to be Removed 2S Private property (Investigation Point #1) Existing East Pavement & Canopy & Northern Lawn to be Removed 3S N 1i Existing Paving to Street State Property (Investigation Point #2) ' 6S Existing Building to be Remain 13' Height Private Property Existing Building to be (Investigation Point #3) Remain 16.5' Height 5S Existing South, Southeast, and Southwest to Remain Subcat Reach Pon Link; 7 1 x A Existing Conditions FL -City of Clearwater 25 -Year Duration =60 min, Inten =3.70 in /hr Prepared by Watefield Design Group, Inc. Page 2 HydroCADO 7.00 s/n 002870 © 1986 -2003 Applied Microcomputer Systems 7/1/2008 Time span =0.00 -2.00 hrs, dt =0.01 hrs, 201 points Runoff by Rational method, Rise /Fall = 1.0/1.0 xTc Reach routing by Stor- Ind +Trans method - Pond routing by Stor -Ind method Subcatchment 1 S: Existing Building to be Removed Runoff Area =8,399 sf Runoff Depth= 1.78" Tc =15.0 min C =0.48 Runoff =0.35 cfs 0.029 of Subcatchment 2S: Existing East Pavement & Canopy & Northe Runoff Area =2,638 sf Runoff Depth = 1.18" Tc =15.0 min C =0.32 Runoff =0.07 cfs 0.006 of Subcatchment 3S: Existing Paving to Street Runoff Area =5,180 sf Runoff Depth = 1.78" Tc =15.0 min C =0.48 Runoff =0.21 cfs 0.018 of Subcatchment 4S: Existing Building to be Remain 16.5' Height Runoff Area =9,611 sf Runoff Depth= 1.78" Tc =15.0 min C =0.48 Runoff =0.40 cfs 0.033 of Subcatchment 5S: Existing South, Southeast, and Southwest Runoff Area = 14,884 sf Runoff Depth= 1.78" Tc =15.0 min C =0:48 Runoff =0.61 cfs 0.051 of Subcatchment 6S: Existing Building to be Remain 13' Height Runoff Area =7,559 sf Runoff Depth= 1.78" Tc =15.0 min C =0.48 Runoff =0.31 cfs 0.026 of Reach 1 R: Private property (Investigation Point #1) Inflow =0.42 cfs 0.035 of Outflow =0.42 cfs 0.035 of Reach 2R: State Property (Investigation Point #2) Inflow =0.21 cfs 0.018 of Outflow =0.21 cfs 0.018 of Reach 3R: Private Property (Investigation Point #3) Inflow =1.32 cfs 0.109 of Outflow =1.32 cfs 0.109 of Total Runoff Area= 1.108 ac Runoff Volume =0.161 of Average Runoff Depth= 1.74" 8 k 'r Existing Conditions FL -City of Clearwater 25 -Year Duration =60 min, lnten =3.70 in /hr Prepared by Watefield Design Group, Inc. Page 3 HydroCADOO 7.00 s/n 002870 © 1986 -2003 Applied Microcomputer Systems 7/1/2008 Subcatchment 1S: Existing Building to be Removed Runoff = 0.35 cfs @ 0.25 hrs, Volume= 0.029 af, Depth= 1.78" Runoff by Rational method, Rise /Fall = 1.0/1.0 xTc, Time Span= 0.00 -2.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs FL -City of Clearwater 25 -Year Duration =60 min, Inten =3.70 in /hr Area (sf) C Description 8,399 0.48 Existing Roof Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) Oft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 15.0 Direct Entry, Roof Runoff Subcatchment 1S: Existing Building to be Removed 0 1 2 Time (hours) D7 Hydrograph 0.38 ........... .... ... ❑Runoff 0.36— 0.34: ' .. _ 0.35 cfs ,�(- _. _.... FL -City ... ... _ _. .... _. .... ... _ .._ ..... ...... _ _of Clearwater.25 -Year_ .m ".. ` " " "" '? 0.32 _ .. Duration -60 min; 0.3- 0.28 0.26 " Runoff -Area -8,399 sf- - 0.24- Runoff Volume -0.029 af... ,3 0.22 _ 0.2 . ... .... Runoff Depth- 1.78�� _ 0 0.1s — Tc_150 min LL 0.16 _.... _- ......._ _ .._.. _ ... C .. 0.14 F -0.48: 0.12 _ 0.1- 0.08— 0.06-- _. 0.04 a _..... 0.02 " 0 1 2 Time (hours) D7 41 Existing Conditions FL-City of Clearwater 25 -Year Duration=60 min, Inten=3.70 in /hr Prepared by Watefield Design Group, Inc. Page 4 HydroCADO 7.00 s/n 002870 0 1986-2003 Applied Microcomputer Systems 7/1/2008 Subcatchment 2S: Existing East Pavement & Canopy & Northern Lawn to be Removed Runoff = 0.07 cfs P 0.25 hrs, Volume= 0.006af, Depth= 1.18" Runoff by Rational method, Rise/Fall=1.0/1.0 xTc, Time Span= 0.00-2.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs FL-City of Clearwater 25-Year Duration=60 min, lnten=3.70 in/hr Area (sf) C Description 1,506 0.48 Loading Dock and Aspalt in Front 1,132 0.10 Northern and Western Lawn 2,638 0.32 Weighted Average Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 15.0 Direct Entry, Paved Subcatchment 2S: Existing East Pavement & Canopy & Northern Lawn to be Removed Hydrograph ----------- 0.08 f/F 0 1 2 Time (hours) 10 Existing Conditions FL -City of Clearwater 25 -Year Duration =60 min, Inten =3.70 in /hr Prepared by Watefield Design Group, Inc. Page 5 HydroCADO 7.00 s/n 002870 © 1986 -2003 Applied Microcomputer Systems 7/1/2008 Subcatchment 3S: Existing Paving to Street Runoff = 0.21 cfs C@ 0.25 hrs, Volume= 0.018 af, Depth= 1.78" Runoff by Rational method, Rise /Fall = 1.0/1.0 xTc, Time Span= 0.00 -2.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs FL -City of Clearwater 25 -Year Duration =60 min, Inten =3.70 in /hr Area (sf) C Description 5,180 .0.48 Canopy and Paved Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft /ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 15.0 Direct Entry, Paved Subcatchment 3S: Existing Paving to Street m Hydrograph Runoff 0.23 .. . ..... 022_" 0.21- ... 0.21 cfs of Clearwater 25- Year 0.2- z D . min,._ _uration60_ .. Inten_370. in/hr_ 016 =' "` .3 __..__.. ..... . _ Runoff Area_5,180 sf. 0.15 ' �._ Runoff_Vo ume_0.018 af._ 0.14 ..... _. - . 0.13'.... ........ ......... ._ ... _ _. _. .......... Runoff Depth -1 7.- 0 0.11 ..... y. , ... ...... Tc -15.0 min.. . LL0.1 i . ... _.. ._ __ ... _ ... ..... .. _.. . _. _. ...._ s ... _- _.... ..... _. ... _. .. 00.48... 0.07. 0 0s __._........_ ..... ................ - 0.05- _ ..... 0.04 0.03 _....... ... ... ... ..... ..... _. ._ ._ _.... _- ... _ _ ... ... .... ... - ... __.. 0.02 .... ... ... .... 0.01. r a , • ,.. 0 0 1 2 Time (hours) 11 4 Existing Conditions FL -City of Clearwater 25 -Year Duration =60 min, Inten =3.70 in /hr Prepared by Watefield Design Group, Inc. Page 6 HydroCAD® 7.00 s/n 002870 © 1986 -2003 Applied Microcomputer Systems 7/1/2008 Subcatchment 4S: Existing Building to be Remain 16.5' Height Runoff = 0.40 cfs @ 0.25 hrs, Volume= 0.033 af, Depth= 1.78" Runoff by Rational method, Rise /Fall= 1.0/1.0 xTc, Time Span= 0.00 -2.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs FL -City of Clearwater 25 -Year Duration =60 min, Inten =3.70 in /hr Area (sf) C Description 9,611 0.48 Existing Roof Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft /ft) (ft /sec) (cfs) 15.0 Direct Entry, Roof Runoff 0 0.24 3 0.2[ .0 o.G 0.1E 0.1 E 0.14 0.11, 0.1 0 . ... ... ... ... .. ... ... .. - .. . ... ... ... 1 Time (hours) 12 2 Existing Conditions FL -City of Clearwater 25 -Year Duration =60 min, Inten =3.70 in /hr Prepared by Watefield Design Group, Inc. Page 7 HydroCAD® 7.00 s/n 002870 © 1986 -2003 Applied Microcomputer Systems 7/1/2008 Subcatchment 5S: Existing South, Southeast, and Southwest to Remain Runoff = 0.61 cfs C) 0.25 hrs, Volume= 0.051 af, Depth= 1.78" Runoff by Rational method, Rise /Fall= 1.0/1.0 xTc, Time Span= 0.00 -2.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs FL -City of Clearwater 25 -Year Duration =60 min, Inten =3.70 in /hr Area (sf) C Description 14,884 0.48 Parking spaces with planters Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft /sec) (cfs) 15.0 Direct Entry, Parking with Planters Subcatchment 5S: Existing South, Southeast, and Southwest to Remain Time (hours) 13 s Existing Conditions FL -City of Clearwater 25 -Year Duration =60 min, Inten =3.70 in /hr Prepared by Watefield Design Group, Inc. Page 8 HydroCADO 7.00 s/n 002870 © 1986 -2003 Applied Microcomputer Systems 7/1/2008 Subcatchment 6S: Existing Building to be Remain 13' Height Runoff = 0.31 cfs @ 0.25 hrs, Volume= 0.026 af, Depth= 1.78" Runoff by Rational method, Rise /Fall= 1.0/1.0 xTc, Time Span= 0.00 -2.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs FL -City of Clearwater 25 -Year Duration =60 min, Inten =3.70 in /hr Area (sf) C Description 7,559 0.48 Existing Roof Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 15.0 Direct Entry, Roof Runoff Subcatchment 6S: Existing Building to be Remain 13' Height 0 1 2 Time (hours) 14 Hydrograph 0.34 ... .... ... __...____......_ ... ... ... .__...... _ ............ 0.32- 0-31 cfs FL =City of Clearwater 25 -Year 0.3 - _ ... ... ... ._ ... ... ... ___. 0.28 :. _.. _ _ ..... _ .... _ „' _. _ _..........._ ......D.u...ration ..60._mi.n,_ .. 0.26 . 4 ........._Inten 3.70 -in /hr 0.24 Runoff -Area- 7,559 sf _ 0.22. . ... Runoff Volume - 0.026 of w 0.2 0.18 Runoff Depth- 1.78" 0 0.16 . ' Tc- 15.0.min 0,14- C =OA8... _ 0.12= 0., 0.081 "; 0.04 0 1 2 Time (hours) 14 0 0 Existing Conditions FL -City of Clearwater 25 -Year Duration =60 min, Inten =3.70 in /hr Prepared by Watefield Design Group, Inc. Page 9 HydroCADO 7.00 s/n 002870 ©1986 -2003 Applied Microcomputer Systems 7/1/2008 Reach 1 R: Private property (investigation Point #1) Inflow Area = 0.253 ac, Inflow Depth = 1.63" for 25 -Year event Inflow = 0.42 cfs Qa 0.25 hrs, Volume= 0.035 of Outflow = 0.42 cfs @ 0.25 hrs, Volume= 0.035 af, Atten= 0 %, Lag= 0.0 min Routing by Stor- Ind +Trans method, Time Span= 0.00 -2.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs N U 3 O LL 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0. 0 Reach 1 R: Private property (Investigation Point #1) Hydrograph _ ....... ......... ............... ............................... _. _.. __ ... _. _............... - _. ... ... ... ... ... _........._ ........... _.. _:....._...._ ...... ... .. .... Outflow o.42cf5 Inflnw Araa -n -9- ate_ -T- 1 Time (hours) 15 2 . �. . : � � . : � � � �- . � �� © °��. \ . �� .. . . . � � } \ � � �: � ��\� � �,� � � � � �� •3 a, . �� . � � . � \i � � � ' . � � � � Existing Conditions FL -City of Clearwater 25 -Year Duration =60 min, Inten =3.70 in /hr Prepared by Watefield Design Group, Inc. Page 10 HydroCAD@ 7.00 s/n 002870 @ 1986 -2003 Applied Microcomputer Systems 7/1/2008 Reach 2R: State Property (Investigation Point #2) Inflow Area = 0.119 ac, Inflow Depth = 1.78" for 25 -Year event Inflow = 0.21 cfs @ 0.25 hrs, Volume= 0.018 of Outflow = 0.21 cfs @ 0.25 hrs, Volume= 0.018 af, Atten= 0 %, Lag= 0.0 min Routing by Stor- Ind +Trans method, Time Span= 0.00 -2.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Reach 2R: State Property (Investigation Point #2) 16 Hydrograph Inflow 0.23 i .... 0 27 cls , : , ,� s . _.. _. - -_ _..... ... . Outflow 0.22 0:2, cs ,z °; Inflow- Area = 0.119 ac 0.21. .... 0.2 ..... ...... 0.18:' - 0.17 ....... ...... .. ... ... ................___.... 016.' 0.15: - .... _ ... .....� 014 v, _ y 0.13' 0.12 .' _ ._ - ........ 0 0.11 ... ' LL 0.1 ... 0.09 _' _ �.v - _- ......... _ _ ... ..._ ....... ......_ _. _ ... ... -_ _ _ ..... 0.08 .... .... 0.07- _ .. 0.06- ., . ' 0.05 004 ... _ 0.03Z - _. -. u a 0.02— 0.01 0 0 1 2 Time (hours) 16 w + w Existing Conditions FL -City of Clearwater 25 -Year Duration =60 min, Inten =3.70 in /hr Prepared by Watefield Design Group, Inc. Page 11 HydroCADO 7.00 s/n 002870 © 1986 -2003 Applied Microcomputer Systems 7/1/2008 Reach 3R: Private Property (Investigation Point #3) Inflow Area 0.736 ac, Inflow Depth = 1.78" for 25 -Year event Inflow = 1.32 cfs @ 0.25 hrs, Volume= 0. 109 of Outflow = 1.32 cfs @ 0.25 hrs, Volume= 0.109 af, Atten= 0 %, Lag= 0.0 min Routing by Stor- Ind +Trans method, Time Span= 0.00 -2.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs N V 3 0 LL Reach 3R: Private Property (Investigation Point #3) Hydrograph 0 1 2 Time (hours) 17 E Inflow ® Outflow w � ca 6S D 3R 2P` d— u1 F a 1 S Portion of Existing Roof Drain Retention Pond Catch Basin Building to Tie into (Pris odial) Pond 3S 1 R Landscaped Front of State Property Building to Street (Investigation Point #1) Existing South, Southeast, and Southwest to Remain Subcat Reach Pon LICIk`; a 18 Proposed Parking and Landscaping a xa: ZI tr ^it • • Proposed Conditions FL -City of Clearwater 25 -Year Duration =60 min, Inten =3.70 in /hr Prepared by Watefield Design Group, Inc. Page 2 HydroCADO 7.00 s/n 002870 © 1986 -2003 Applied Microcomputer Systems 7/1/2008 Time span =0.00 -2.00 hrs, dt =0.01 hrs, 201 points Runoff by Rational method, Rise /Fall= 1.0/1.0 xTc Reach routing by Stor- Ind +Trans method - Pond routing by Stor -Ind method Subcatchment 1S: Proposed Parking and Landscaping Runoff Area = 13,311 sf Runoff Depth= 2.81" Tc =15.0 min C =0.76 Runoff =0.87 cfs 0.072 of Subcatchment 3S: Landscaped Front of Building to Street Runoff Area =2,954 sf Runoff Depth= 1.44" Tc =15.0 min C =0.39 Runoff =0.10 cfs 0.008 of Subcatchment 4S: Existing Building to Remain Runoff Area =9,611 sf Runoff Depth= 1.78" Tc =15.0 min C =0.48 Runoff =0.40 cfs 0.033 of Subcatchment 5S: Existing South, Southeast, and Southwest Runoff Area = 14,884 sf Runoff Depth= 1.78" Tc =15.0 min C =0.48 Runoff =0.61 cfs 0.051 of Subcatchment 6S: Portion of Existing Building to Tie into Pon Runoff Area =7,559 sf Runoff Depth= 3.51" Tc =15.0 min C =0.95 Runoff =0.62 cfs 0.051 of Reach IR: State Property (Investigation Point #1) Inflow =0.78 cfs 0.055 of Outflow =0.78 cfs 0.055 of Reach 2R: Private Property (Investigation Point #2) Inflow =1.01 cfs 0.083 of Outflow =1.01 cfs 0.083 of Reach 3R: Roof Drain Peak Depth =0.19' Max Vet =12.1 fps Inflow =0.62 cfs 0.051 of D =4.0" n =0.011 L =15.0' S= 0.2000 T Capacity =1.01 cfs Outflow =0.62 cfs 0.051 of Pond 1 P: Catch Basin Peak Elev= 61.62' Inflow =0.87 cfs 0.072 of 10.0" x 4.0' Culvert Outflow =0.87 cfs 0.072 of Pond 2P: Retention Pond (Prismodial) Peak Elev= 60.95' Storage =510 cf Inflow =1.48 cfs 0.122 of Discarded =0.80 cfs 0.075 of Primary =0.68 cfs 0.047 of Outflow =1.48 cfs 0.122 of Total Runoff Area = 1.109 ac Runoff Volume = 0.214 of Average Runoff Depth = 2.31" 19 W y � • Proposed Conditions FL -City of Clearwater 25 -Year Duration =60 min, Inten =3.70 in /hr Prepared by Watefield Design Group, Inc. Page 3 HydroCAD® 7.00 s/n 002870 0 1986 -2003 Applied Microcomputer Systems 7/1/2008 Subcatchment 1S: Proposed Parking and Landscaping Runoff = 0.87 cfs @ 0.25 hrs, Volume= 0.072 af, Depth= 2.81" Runoff by Rational method, Rise /Fall = 1.0/1.0 xTc, Time Span= 0.00 -2.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs FL -City of Clearwater 25 -Year Duration =60 min, Inten =3.70 in /hr Area (sf) C Description 8,464 0.95 Parking and Concrete Walkway 1,632 0.20 Landscaping 1,375 1.00 Retention Pond 368 0.20 Landscaping 1,472 0.20 Landscaping 13,311 0.76 Weighted Average Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft /ft) (ft /sec) (cfs) 15.0 Direct Entry, Assumed from CL SDC 0 1 2 Time (hours) 20 la." �s vk 44 '4n�� • Proposed Conditions FL -City of Clearwater 25 -Year Duration =60 min, Inten =3.70 in /hr Prepared by Watefield Design Group, Inc. Page 4 HydroCADO 7.00 s/n 002870 © 1986 -2003 Applied Microcomputer Systems 7/1/2008 Subcatchment 3S: Landscaped Front of Building to Street Runoff = 0.10 cfs @ 0.25 hrs, Volume= 0.008 af, Depth= 1.44" Runoff by Rational method, Rise /Fall = 1.0/1.0 xTc, Time Span= 0.00 -2.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs FL -City of Clearwater 25 -Year Duration =60 min, Inten =3.70 in /hr Area (sf) C Description 2,199 0.20 Landscaped Area to Street 75 0.95 Asphault 680 0.95 Canopy 2,954 0.39 Weighted Average Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 15.0 Direct Entry, Landscaped Area Subcatchment 3S: Landscaped Front of Building to Street Hydrograph 0.11. Runoff 0.105' o.io 1. cis FL City of Clearwater 25 -Year 0.095 009 Duration -60 -min 0.085 =3 70._in h.r.... 0.08 . _Intern 000 _. _ Runoff Area =2,954 sf Runoff Volume 0.008 af.... Z 0.06 v >_ Runoff Depth_1.44" . 3 0.055' 0 0.05 _ .... r ... Tc _ min.. 15 0 - 0.045 0.04 _.... _ .. _. . _ __.. 0.035 0.03= ..... _. ... .. _ _ ...... 0.025-1 _ _. _ ..... ........ _. . 0.02-1 _ .......... ... ... ........ 0.015 - . ............._ _...... 001 ... ... . . _ ................._ _ .........................._ _ _ s 0.005 a OIL 1 2 0 Time (hours) 21 -. ,� f� x ,� f� z, —� r-. 'p4 4�6 �• `^ � � kA j ' �;� CCJ �`�'..;.ta� � "➢ . l � R� °"� a �`,�i9 � . Q® `�� V�d • 0 Proposed Conditions FL -City of Clearwater 25 -Year Duration =60 min, Inten =3.70 in /hr Prepared by Watefield Design Group, Inc. Page 5 HydroCADO 7.00 s/n 002870 ©1986 -2003 Applied Microcomputer Systems 7/1/2008 Subcatchment 4S: Existing Building to Remain Runoff = 0.40 cfs @ 0.25 hrs, Volume= 0.033 af, Depth= 1.78" Runoff by Rational method, Rise /Fall= 1.0/1.0 xTc, Time Span= 0.00 -2.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs FL -City of Clearwater 25 -Year Duration =60 min, Inten =3.70 in /hr Area (sf) C Description 9,611 0.48 Existing Roof Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 15.0 Direct Entry, Roof Runoff Subcatchment 4S: Existing Building to Remain 22 Proposed Conditions FL -City of Clearwater 25 -Year Duration =60 min, Inten =3.70 in /hr Prepared by Watefield Design Group, Inc. Page 6 HydroCADO 7.00 s/n 002870 © 1986 -2003 Applied Microcomputer Systems 7/1/2008 Subcatchment 5S: Existing South, Southeast, and Southwest to Remain Runoff = 0.61 cfs @ 0.25 hrs, Volume= 0.051 af, Depth= 1.78" Runoff by Rational method, Rise /Fall= 1.0/1.0 xTc, Time Span= 0.00 -2.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs FL -City of Clearwater 25 -Year Duration =60 min, Inten =3.70 in /hr Area (sf) C Description 14,884 0.48 Parking spaces with planters Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft /ft) (ft /sec) (cfs) 15.0 Direct Entry, Parking with Planters Subcatchment 5S: Existing South, Southeast, and Southwest to Remain Time (hours) 23 '� ,. '� , i° _ to .. � - � . 4i `"�� .. � - _ � � �� `� � � (� ' `;_ � � f�d �?� �� 9 8 ' � •�J `? ,;�� Proposed Conditions FL -City of Clearwater 25 -Year Duration =60 min, Inten =3.70 in /hr Prepared by Watefield Design Group, Inc. Page 7 HydroCADO 7.00 s/n 002870 © 1986 -2003 Applied Microcomputer Systems 7/1/2008 Subcatchment 6S: Portion of Existing Building to Tie into Pond Runoff = 0.62 cfs @ 0.25 hrs, Volume= 0.051 af, Depth= 3.51" Runoff by Rational method, Rise /Fall= 1.0/1.0 xTc, Time Span= 0.00 -2.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs FL -City of Clearwater 25 -Year Duration =60 min, Inten =3.70 in /hr Area (sf) C Description 7,559 0.95 Existing Building Tying into Pond Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 15.0 Direct Entry, Roof Runoff Subcatchment 6S: Portion of Existing Building to Tie into Pond 0 1 2 Time (hours) 24 r: ..fl c -5 Proposed Conditions FL -City of Clearwater 25 -Year Duration =60 min, Inten =3.70 in1hr Prepared by Watefield Design Group, Inc. Page 8 HydroCADO 7.00 s/n 002870 © 1986 -2003 Applied Microcomputer Systems 7/1/2008 Reach 1 R: State Property (Investigation Point #1) Inflow Area = 0.547 ac, Inflow Depth = 1.21" for 25 -Year event Inflow = 0.78 cfs @ 1.00 hrs, Volume= 0.055 of Outflow = 0.78 cfs C@ 1.00 hrs, Volume= 0.055 af, Atten= 0 %, Lag= 0.0 min Routing by Stor- Ind +Trans method, Time Span= 0.00 -2.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs y 3 0 LL Reach 1 R: State Property (Investigation Point #1) Hydrograph 0 1 2 Time (hours) 25 o Inflow Outflow _ ,„ � � � , ,. �p �.;�, -� a� ,�.. ,,� � �. -�� r.a �� .� �' ¢� � ..� -� - �� - ,, •. Proposed Conditions FL -City of Clearwater 25 -Year Duration =60 min, Inten =3.70 in /hr Prepared by Watefield Design Group, Inc. Page 9 HydroCADO 7.00 s/n 002870 ©1986 -2003 Applied Microcomputer Systems 7/1/2008 Reach 2R: Private Property (Investigation Point #2) Inflow Area = 0.562 ac, Inflow Depth = 1.78" for 25 -Year event Inflow = 1.01 cfs Ca) 0.25 hrs, Volume= 0.083 of Outflow = 1.01 cfs @ 0.25 hrs, Volume= 0.083 af, Atten= 0 %, Lag= 0.0 min Routing by Stor- Ind +Trans method, Time Span= 0.00 -2.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs N V 3 0 IL Reach 2R: Private Property (Investigation Point #2) Hydrograph 0 1 2 Time (hours) 26 Inflow O Outflow • ,� � �� .; � .: �;3 � �z F ^� �'L �� y� �� ;� Qoi � r r^ ju q. M"•�d P�O � �- a �f� R .g. a � ,�;� !� �. �, ` Proposed Conditions FL -City of Clearwater 25 -Year Duration =60 min, Inten =3.70 in /hr Prepared by Watefield Design Group, Inc. Page 10 HydroCADO 7.00 s/n 002870 © 1986 -2003 Applied Microcomputer Systems 7/1/2008 Reach 3R: Roof Drain Inflow Area = 0.174 ac, Inflow Depth = 3.51" for 25 -Year event Inflow = 0.62 cfs @ 0.25 hrs, Volume= 0.051 of Outflow = 0.62 cfs @ 0.26 hrs, Volume= 0.051 af, Atten= 0 %, Lag= 0.6 min Routing by Stor- Ind +Trans method, Time Span= 0.00 -2.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Max. Velocity= 12.1 fps, Min. Travel Time= 0.0 min Avg. Velocity = 11.1 fps, Avg. Travel Time= 0.0 min Peak Depth= 0.19' @ 0.26 hrs Capacity at bank full= 1.01 cfs Inlet Invert= 63.00', Outlet Invert= 60.00' 4.0" Diameter Pipe n=0.011 Length= 15.0' Slope= 0.2000 '/' 27 Inflow 0 Outflow s . jw: f ;;' � •;r�; Grp (� CC= 0 Proposed Conditions FL -City of Clearwater 25 -Year Duration =60 min, Inten =3.70 in /hr Prepared by Watefield Design Group, Inc. Page 11 HydroCADO 7.00 s/n 002870 © 1986 -2003 Applied Microcomputer Systems 7/1/2008 Pond 1 P: Catch Basin Inflow Area = 0.306 ac, Inflow Depth = 2.81" for 25 -Year event Inflow = 0.87 cfs @ 0.25 hrs, Volume= 0.072 of Outflow = 0.87 cfs @ 0.25 hrs, Volume= 0.072 af, Atten= 0 %, Lag= 0.0 min Primary = 0.87 cfs @ 0.25 hrs, Volume= 0.072 of Routing by Stor -Ind method, Time Span= 0.00 -2.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Peak Elev= 61.62' Ca) 0.25 hrs Flood Elev= 63.00' Plug -Flow detention time= 0.0 min calculated for 0.072 of (100% of inflow) Center -of -Mass det. time= 0.0 min ( 37.5 - 37.5) # Routing Invert Outlet Devices 1 Primary 61.00' 10.0" x 4.0' long Culvert Ke= 1.000 Outlet Invert= 60.00' S=0.2500'/' n=0.011 Cc= 0.900 Primary OutFlow Max =0.87 cfs @ 0.25 hrs HW= 61.62' (Free Discharge) t-1 =Culvert (Inlet Controls 0.87 cfs @ 2.0 fps) 0.8E O.E 0.7'. 0.7 0.6E O.E H 0.5E U _2 0.4E LL 0.4 0.3E 0.: 0.2E 0.21 0.1E 0.1 Pond 1 P: Catch Basin ,: ........ ......... iX.; Cif. 0 1 Time (hours) 28 2 -t M - ',� co CJ Proposed Conditions FL -City of Clearwater 25 -Year Duration =60 min, Inten =3.70 in /hr Prepared by Watefield Design Group, Inc. Page 12 HydroCAD® 7.00 s/n 002870 © 1986 -2003 Applied Microcomputer Systems 7/1/2008 Pond 2P: Retention Pond (Prismodial) Inflow Area = 0.479 ac, Inflow Depth = 3.07" for 25 -Year event Inflow = 1.48 cfs @ 0.26 hrs, Volume= 0.122 of Outflow = 1.48 cfs @ 1.00 hrs, Volume= 0.122 af, Atten= 0 %, Lag= 44.4 min Discarded = 0.80 cfs @ 1.00 hrs, Volume= 0.075 of Primary = 0.68 cfs @ 1.00 hrs, Volume= 0.047 of Routing by Stor -Ind method, Time Span= 0.00 -2.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Peak Elev= 60.95' @ 1.00 hrs Surf.Area= 1,214 sf Storage= 510 cf Plug -Flow detention time= 5.7 min calculated for 0.122 of (100% of inflow) Center -of -Mass det. time= 5.7 min ( 43.3 - 37.5 ) # Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description 1 60.00' 1,937 cf 2.00'W x 119.00'L x 2.00'H Prismatoid Z =4.0 2,583 cf Overall x 75.0% Voids # Routing Invert Outlet Devices 1 Primary 60.50' 15.0" x 90.0' long Culvert Ke= 1.000 Outlet Invert= 58.25' S=0.0250'/' n=0.013 Cc= 0.900 2 Discarded 0.00' 0.038750 fpm Exfiltration over entire Wetted area Discarded OutFlow Max =0.80 cfs @ 1.00 hrs HW= 60.95' (Free Discharge) L2 =Exfiltration (Exfiltration Controls 0.80 cfs) Primary OutFlow Max =0.68 cfs @ 1.00 hrs HW= 60.95' (Free Discharge) t-1 =Culvert (Inlet Controls 0.68 cfs @ 1.7 fps) 29 .F:`. r r�. �a . ��,�- � �� x �� Pte; � f 4� �� {��rl Q r� � . � p�� 6M __ �� °� _ 0 Proposed Conditions FL -City of Clearwater 25 -Year Duration =60 min, Inten =3.70 in /hr Prepared by Watefield Design Group, Inc. Page 13 HydroCADO 7.00 s/n 002870 © 1986 -2003 Applied Microcomputer Systems 7/1/2008 N U 3 0 LL Pond 2P: Retention Pond (Prismodial) Hydrograph 1 Time (hours) 30 IInflow OutflowDiscarded Primary � a _w "!C f�7 � �. �-+� F` "x51 ��;'� �° �� 9 �;� �:,: :_ip 6 ^d,. � � .. �'.�' �. a . _ 0 3R cap 6S D D 2P <}— � 1 P,. ' Ois Portion of Existing Roof Drain Retention Pond Catch Basin Proposed Parking and Building to Tie into (Prismodial) Landscaping Pond S" ubcat Reach Pori L6' a 31 r h e� Proposed treatment of first half inch of rainfall Rainfall Duration =60 min, Inten =0.50 in /hr Prepared by Watefield Design Group, Inc. Page 2 HydroCADO 7.00 s/n 002870 ©1986 -2003 Applied Microcomputer Systems 7/1/2008 Time span =0.00 -2.00 hrs, dt =0.01 hrs, 201 points Runoff by Rational method, Rise /Fall = 1.0/1.0 xTc Reach routing by Stor- Ind +Trans method - Pond routing by Stor -Ind method Subcatchment 1S: Proposed Parking and Landscaping Runoff Area = 13,311 sf Runoff Depth = 0.38" Tc =15.0 min C =0.76 Runoff =0.12 cfs 0.010 of Subcatchment 6S: Portion of Existing Building to Tie into Pon Runoff Area =7,559 sf Runoff Depth = 0.47" Tc =15.0 min C =0.95 Runoff =0.08 cfs 0.007 of Reach 3R: Roof Drain Peak Depth =0.07' Max Vet =6.0 fps Inflow =0.08 cfs 0.007 of D =4.0" n =0.011 L =15.0' S=0.1333'/' Capacity =0.82 cfs Outflow =0.08 cfs 0.007 of Pond 1 P: Catch Basin Peak EIev= 62.20' Inflow =0.12 cfs 0.010 of 10.0" x4.0' Culvert Outflow =0.12 cfs 0.010 of Pond 2P: Retention Pond (Prismodial) Peak EIev= 60.07' Storage =1 5 cf Inflow =0.20 cfs 0.017 of Discarded =0.20 cfs 0.017 of Primary =0.00 cfs 0.000 of Outflow =0.20 cfs 0.017 of Total Runoff Area = 0.479 ac Runoff Volume = 0.017 of Average Runoff Depth = 0.41" 32 n 6� Proposed treatment of first half inch of rainfall Rainfall Duration =60 min, Inten =0.50 in /hr Prepared by Watefield Design Group, Inc. Page 3 HydroCADO 7.00 s/n 002870 © 1986 -2003 Applied Microcomputer Systems 7/1/2008 Subcatchment 1S: Proposed Parking and Landscaping Runoff = 0.12 cfs @ 0.25 hrs, Volume= 0.010 af, Depth= 0.38" Runoff by Rational method, Rise /Fall= 1.0/1.0 xTc, Time Span= 0.00 -2.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Rainfall Duration =60 min, Inten =0.50 in /hr Area (sf) C Description 8,464 0.95 Parking and Concrete Walkway 1,632 0.20 Landscaping 1,375 1.00 Retention Pond 368 0.20 Landscaping 1,472 0.20 Landscaping 13,311 0.76 Weighted Average Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 15.0 Direct Entry, Assumed from CL SDC Subcatchment 1S: Proposed Parking and Landscaping Hydrograph 0.13- 0.125= . . ...... .. _ Runoff 0.12. - 0.12cts ✓ `.s' �".; _.. ....... ...._ ..... ..... _ ... r 0.115, ...... —.-Rainfall „ 0.105 ...... Duration- 60... 0.1 °:: min , 0.095 Inten =0:5O in /hr 0 09 0.085 008 ... __ ... ... Runoff Area =1 =3,311 sf , 0.075 .. ..... 0.07 =' _. _ _ unoff Volume= 0.010 of . . 3 0.065 3 0.06- u Runoff Depth - 0:38' 0.055 -' ..... .... 0.05 ....... . Tc -15.0 min 0.045- 0.04- .. _ .. .. _ C- 0.76._ 0.035 .. .. 0 03 .... 0.025 ..... 0.024' 02 ...... - 0.015 0.01' ... ...... .... 0 1 2 Time (hours) 33 a a V E fia ice, • 0 Proposed treatment of first half inch of rainfall Rainfall Duration =60 min, Inten =0.50 in /hr Prepared by Watefield Design Group, Inc. Page 4 HydroCADO 7.00 s/n 002870 © 1986 -2003 Applied Microcomputer Systems 7/1/2008 Subcatchment 6S: Portion of Existing Building to Tie into Pond Runoff = 0.08 cfs @ 0.25 hrs, Volume= 0.007 af, Depth= 0.47' Runoff by Rational method, Rise /Fall = 1.0/1.0 xTc, Time Span= 0.00 -2.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Rainfall Duration =60 min, Inten =0.50 in /hr Area (sf) C Description 7,559 0.95 Existing Building Tying into Pond Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft /ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 15.0 Direct Entry, Roof Runoff Subcatchment 6S: Portion of Existing Building to Tie into Pond 0 1 2 Time (hours) 34 Hydrograph 0.09 .. _. ... ... . ... .... ......... _....._ _ Runoff 0.085- ' 0.0e cfs .. ..... . 008 " . Rainfall 0.075 - "` _.. , .._............_. ......_.. Duration =60...min, 0.077' 0.065 ...... .... In.ten =0.50 in /hr. 0.06 _ # _ Runoff Area -7,559 sf 0.055- 0.05-- - - unoff. Volume -0.007 of 3 0.045- 0.04_ unoff Depth- 0.47" 0.035 Tc -15 0 min 0.03 0.025 ' lr .. U.95...... 0.02 ,.... _ .. 0.015 ..... 0.01 0.005 0 1 2 Time (hours) 34 r d, LIT M .mss z Proposed treatment of first half inch of rainfall Rainfall Duration =60 min, Inten =0.50 in /hr Prepared by Watefield Design Group, Inc. Page 5 HydroCADO 7.00 s/n 002870 © 1986 -2003 Applied Microcomputer Systems 7/1/2008 Reach 3R: Roof Drain Inflow Area = 0.174 ac, Inflow Depth = 0.47" Inflow = 0.08 cfs @ 0.25 hrs, Volume= 0.007 of Outflow = 0.08 cfs @ 0.26 hrs, Volume= 0.007 af, Atten= 0 %, Lag= 0.6 min Routing by Stor- Ind +Trans method, Time Span= 0.00 -2.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Max. Velocity= 6.0 fps, Min. Travel Time= 0.0 min Avg. Velocity = 5.5 fps, Avg. Travel Time= 0.0 min Peak Depth= 0.07'@ 0.26 hrs Capacity at bank full= 0.82 cfs Inlet Invert= 62.00', Outlet Invert= 60.00' 4.0" Diameter Pipe n=0.011 Length= 15.0' Slope= 0.1333 '/' Reach 3R: Roof Drain 35 Hydrograph ..... .. _.... .... ... ._ ... _... ... ... .. ... ... Inflow 0.09 . o oe crs E Inflow Area -0.174 ac El Outflow 0.08 = - � Peak . Depth 0.07' _ 0.075 � ` _.. 0.07z' ' Max Vet -6.0 fps - 0.065 - , 0.06 s 0.055 y .......... 0.05 _ .... f_A 0 o.oas LL '. x . L 0' =15: o.oa .... 0.035 - S= 0.133.3 0.03 ._ .. _.... 0.025 -" Capacity -0.82 -cfs- 0.02 - ... __ ... - - - - - 0.015- ........ ., . ........ 0.01-1 0.005 0 1 2 Time (hours) 35 C . ts) pa 0 Proposed treatment of first half inch of rainfall Rainfall Duration =60 min, Inten =0.50 in /hr Prepared by Watefield Design Group, Inc. Page 6 HydroCADO 7.00 s/n 002870 © 1986 -2003 Applied Microcomputer Systems 7/1/2008 Pond 1 P: Catch Basin Inflow Area = 0.306 ac, Inflow Depth = 0.38" Inflow - 0.12 cfs @ 0.25 hrs, Volume= 0.010 of Outflow = 0.12 cfs @ 0.25 hrs, Volume= 0.01Oaf, Atten= 0 %, Lag= 0.0 min Primary = 0.12 cfs @ 0.25 hrs, Volume= 0.010 of Routing by Stor -Ind method, Time Span= 0.00 -2.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Peak Elev= 62.20'@ 0.25 hrs Flood Elev= 63.00' Plug -Flow detention time= (not calculated) Center -of -Mass det. time= (not calculated) # Routing Invert Outlet Devices 1 Primary 62.00' 10.0" x 4.0' long Culvert Ke= 1.000 Outlet Invert= 61.00' S=0.2500'/' n=0.011 Cc= 0.900 0.01 0 —r— Time (hours) 36 K .. .., .� ,;, ,, G ( r 0 Proposed treatment of first half inch of rainfall Rainfall Duration =60 min, Inten =0.50 in /hr Prepared by Watefield Design Group, Inc. Page 7 HydroCAD® 7.00 s/n 002870 © 1986 -2003 Applied Microcomputer Systems 7/1/2008 Pond 2P: Retention Pond (Prismodial) Inflow Area = 0.479 ac, Inflow Depth = 0.41" Inflow = 0.20 cfs @ 0.26 hrs, Volume= 0.017 of Outflow = 0.20 cfs @ 1.00 hrs, Volume= 0.017 af, Atten= 0 %, Lag= 44.4 min Discarded = 0.20 cfs @ 1.00 hrs, Volume= 0.017 of Primary = 0.00 cfs @ 0.00 hrs, Volume= 0.000 of Routing by Stor -Ind method, Time Span= 0.00 -2.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Peak Elev= 60.07' Ca) 1.00 hrs Surf.Area= 308 sf Storage= 15 cf Plug -Flow detention time= 1.0 min calculated for 0.016 of (100% of inflow) Center -of -Mass det. time= 1.0 min ( 38.5 - 37.5 ) # Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description 1 60.00' 1,937 cf 2.00'W x 119.00'L x 2.00'H Prismatoid Z =4.0 2,583 cf Overall x 75.0% Voids # Routing Invert Outlet Devices 1 Primary 60.50' 15.0" x 90.0' long Culvert Ke= 1.000 Outlet Invert= 58.25' S=0.0250'/' n=0.013 Cc= 0.900 2 Discarded 0.00' 0.038750 fpm Exfiltration over entire Wetted area Discarded OutFlow Max =0.20 cfs @ 1.00 hrs HW= 60.07' (Free Discharge) t-2 =Exfiltration (Exfiltration Controls 0.20 cfs) Primary OutFlow Max =0.00 cfs @ 0.00 hrs HW= 60.00' (Free Discharge) t-1 =Culvert ( Controls 0.00 cfs) 37 r aY ,, . ,: r � e �v �� .: �� ® 4 s;.7 � =_+� -..; C Proposed treatment of first half inch of rainfall Rainfall Duration =60 min, Inten =0.50 in /hr Prepared by Watefield Design Group, Inc. Page 8 HydroCADO 7.00 s/n 002870 © 1986 -2003 Applied Microcomputer Systems 7/1/2008 Pond 2P: Retention Pond (Prismodial) 0 1 2 Time (hours) 38 =00, , , r • , . / ®! ®Ili 0� 0 1 2 Time (hours) 38 J . s •' b IOC �6.! .�.ri J 0 Appendix T cl • 4, , 4� r, I' m o FEE', •� g'. ��') � � r .m1� 9 „rE.P O B9°d 7v 1 yn `- 1 p Hydrology Handbook January 2004 F -2 Overland Flow Velocities for Various Land Use Types L CL } 0 W m z Q J CC W 5 O W C7 Q W } Q IC L t: �1 m1 �1 01 _ ■a�� INNyIMMEN IMMIMEMEM =MEE 0 i 2 3 4 5 6 AVERAGE SLOPE OF TERRAIN (Percent) Paved — — Municipal- Highly Developed •. .... Municipal - Residentiol - -- Rural- Cultivated - - - Wooded -Low Storage - - - -- Wooded -High Storage B -24 GULF COAST TESTING LABORATORY, INC -z; z,-4 5745 PARK BOULEVARD PINELLAS PARK, FL 33781 0 CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS ENGINEERING COUNCIL CERTIFIED ;? n ZoQ9 CERTIFIACTE ofAUTHORIZATION # 00002370 - �(727)_5,4,4-4080 17, r +r' {FA. (,727.) 5044 -7532 CLIENT: Dr. Kazi Hassan PROJECT: 1314 S Missouri Avenue, Clearwater, Florida DATE TESTED: 6/25/08 LOCATION OF TEST: Test # 1, 21' W x 3' N of NE Comer of North Most Building Section DEPTH TO EXISTING WATER TABLE: 9' 2" Below the Existing Ground Surface ESTIMATED SEASONAL HIGH WATER LEVEL: 6'f Below the Existing Ground Surface REMARKS: WATER TEMP: 82 deg. F WATER pH: 7.99 •= INNER RING READINGS 33.0 32.0 31.0 30.0 29.0 28.0 27.0 26.0 25.0 24.0 INCH PER HOURo �, . I N F I L T R A T I O N R A T E .5 1 2 3 4 5 6 Elapsed Time (Hours) UMRATION RATE = 27.9 INCHES / HR s TMS`lf Ground level k a e A L .aey' OA,t "2_.�" �' 62• PF ;I g n}e.A Ztet'&ld- be'sotroup 1 �ilee`e$cc�t�4 ;�Jd 1 TEST Depth <: >:::.. T-011 U.... below Exlstinde :_... Test Elevation LAB NO: 15262 DATE REPORTED: 6/26/08 SOIL PROFILE Depth CLASSIFICATION in feet. (EXISTING SURFACE APPROX. ELEV.) Gray SAND w/ Glass, Metal & Occasional Roots, 10YR 511 IOYR 6/1 >3:<;tt'<«<< Light Gray SAND, 10YR 7/1 Dark Yell owish Brown SAND w/ " <'> ' Trace Roots, 10YR 4/4 Very Pale Brown SAND, 2.5YR 7/3 White SAND w/ Trace of Roots, 10YR 8/1 ;<«'? Black SAND w/ Organic Stain & f fl} Occasional Roots, IOYR 2/1 Hole Terminated at 120" 1211 Inner 1/8 ...........,.1/4" runs .-----------.::.:::::• ?<•6 wat er � _....._. :..,g,.. ., 24" Outer ring This report is the property of the Client listed and cannot be copied or reproduced without written permission of the Client or GCTL. GULF CAST TESTING LABORATORY INC.��= 5745 PARK BOULEVARD :�1t�0 PINELLAS PARK, FL 33781 02 CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS ENGINEERING COUNCIL CERTIFIED CERTIFIACTEofAUTHORIZATION #00002370 ir!,l't, �i H0NE-- (727):544 -4.080 {727)° 544.7532 is CLIENT: Dr. Kazi Hassan LAB NO: 15262 PROJECT: 1314 S Missouri Avenue, Clearwater, Florida DATE REPORTED: 6/27/08 DATE TESTED: 6/27/08 LOCATION OF TEST: Test #2, 35' E x 27' S of NE Corner of North Most Building Section DEPTH TO EXISTING WATER TABLE: 8' 1" Below the Existing Ground Surface ESTIMATED SEASONAL HIGH WATER LEVEL: Approx. 5'6" Below the Existing Ground Surface REMARKS: This DRI test location is approximately 12" lower in elevation than DRI Test #1 location. As per Client's rep., this DRI test location was moved to the east side of the existing loading dock area. WATER TEMP: 81 deg. F WATER pH: 7.99 •= INNER RING READINGS SOIL PROFILE 30.0 29.0 28.0 27.0 26.0 25.0 24.0 23.0 22.0 21.0 INCH PER HOUR r Cuter Ne .5 1 2 3 4 5 6 Elapsed Time (Hours) INFILTRATION RATE = 23.4 INCHES/ HR Submitted, I N F I L T R A T I O N R A T E Ground level TEST Depth '' > 3'°O" below Exptin .:: rrlde ::... 4 Test Elevation'' IDepth CLASSIFICATION in feet. (EXISTING SURFACE APPROX. ELEV.) 10YR 7/2 White SAND, 10YR 8/1 Light Brownish Gray SAND, 10YR 6/2 Black SAND, IOYR 2/1 Hole Terminated at 120" 12" Inner ... .... ........... ... .... ... . - [ .. ............ ...... ... ...... ....._ 2-4" 24" Outer ring 1/4" 6 "water beset This report is the property of the Client listed and cannot be copied or reproduced without written permission of the Client or GCTL. Gulf Coast Testing Laboratory, Inc. Lab #15262 6/25/08 1314 S Missouri Avenue, Clearwater, FL DRI Test Locations C) RECS , �. L 0 22008 PIANW -4G 'AMACENr CITY OF a- CEARI'i% I ER DRAINAGE REPORT Prepared for Pain Management 1314 South Missouri Avenue Clearwater, Florida Submitted to the Clearwater Planning Department Flexible Development Application �CRAIG R. MILLER, P. E. No. 62325 The Waterfield Design Group, Inc. WATERFIELD DESIGN GROUP, INC. S. MANHATTAN AVE. TAM PA, FL 33611 ` 4340 South Manhattan Avenue TAM PHONE: (813) 839 -5700 Tampa, FL 33611 July 1, 2008 ru ebb PY_e DRAINAGE REPORT Prepared for Pain Management 1314 South Missouri Avenue Clearwater, Florida Submitted to the Clearwater Planning Department Flexible Development Application �CRAIG R. MILLER, P. E. No. 62325 The Waterfield Design Group, Inc. WATERFIELD DESIGN GROUP, INC. S. MANHATTAN AVE. TAM PA, FL 33611 ` 4340 South Manhattan Avenue TAM PHONE: (813) 839 -5700 Tampa, FL 33611 July 1, 2008 • TABLE OF CONTENTS 0, PURPOSE........................................................................ ............................... I SITEDESCRIPTION ... ..................................................... ..............................1 EXISTING CONDITIONS .................................................... ..............................2 PROPOSED DESIGN ........................................................... ..............................2 RATIONAL ............................................... ............................... ......3 ................. CALCULATIONS............................................................... ..............................3 CONCLUSION................................................................... ..............................3 EXISTING CONDITIONS SHEET .......................................... ..............................5 PROPOSED CONDITIONS SHEET ........................................ ..............................6 HYDROCAD CALCULATIONS ............................................ ...........................7 -38 a ' ' alp to ZONE 6 RAINFALL IDF CURVES F -2 OVERLAND FLOW VELOCITIES FOR VARIOUS LAND USE TYPES PROJECT NARRATIVE Purpose The Applicant is proposing to redevelop approximately one -third of the existing site. The Applicant is proposing to remove the northern one -third of the existing building and the loading dock and replace them with proposed parking, landscaping, and a dry detention basin. The purpose of this report is to model the exiting peak flows emanating from the limits of the redeveloped area and compare these exiting peak flows to those calculated for the proposed redevelopment to this same area. Site Description The project site is an approximately 48,319 SF lot bounded by South Missouri Avenue to the east, private commercial properties to the north and south, and private residential properties to the west. The site is currently utilized as for commercial purposes. The site consists of an attached 19.5' and 13.0' high structure with a footprint of 25,568 SF, a parking lot to the south, a paved area to the east for access, and a paved loading dock to the north. Infiltration rate of soils in the field were determined using a double ring infiltrometer. These tests were conducted by Gulf Coast Testing Laboratory, Inc, 5745 Park Boulevard, Pinellas Park, FL 33781. Test #1 located 21' west and 3' north of the existing northeast building comer revealed the following: 0' S" Gray Sand 214" Gray Sand 3'0" Light Gray Sand 3'5" Dark Yellowish Brown Sand 4'2" Very Pale Brown Sand 9'3" White Sand 10'0" Black Sand Existing water table: 9'2" Estimated Seasonal High Water Level: 6't Infiltration Rate: 27.9 inches/hr. Test #2 located 35' east and 27' south of the existing northeast building comer revealed the following: 0' 3" Asphalt 1'4" Very Pale Brown Sand 2'0" Light Gray Sand 2' 10" Dark Brown Sand 4'5" Light Gray Sand 8'5" White Sand 9'2" Light Brownish Gray 10'0" Black Sand Existing water table: 81" Estimated Seasonal High Water Level: 5'6" Infiltration Rate: 23.4 inches/hr. Existing Conditions (See Existing Conditions Sheet) The majority of the site slopes gently downward from southeast to northwest across the site and, ultimately, to the westerly abutters' properties. There is an existing low spot in the southern parking area where the majority of the flow from the southern portion of the property leaves the site. The building storm drains currently exit to downspouts or through sheet flow at the rear of the property and flow onto the westerly abutters' properties. The paved access way in front of the site slopes onto South Missouri Avenue. There is an existing state owned catch basin along South Missouri Avenue. This catch basin collects the overland flow from the existing paved access area. The stormwater from the northern loading dock flows north and onto abutters' properties. There are no wetlands present on site. The site is not contributing to an existing flooding problem. Proposed Design (See Proposed Conditions Sheet) The northern one -third of the existing building will be removed and replaced with parking, landscaping and a dry detention pond. A strip of asphalt to the east of the existing building will be replaced with landscaping. The southern parking area will remain predominately the same with some paving being removed and replaced with landscaping. Because the modifications to this area are so minor it was not considered in the redevelopment calculations. Proposed drainage at the site will follow existing flow patterns in the southern portion and new flow patterns in the northern portion. In the redeveloped northern portion, stormwater will be the collected from proposed parking area and from the 13.0' high, 7,559 SF portion of the remaining building. Although it is not necessary to retain the stormwater runoff from the existing building a portion is proposed to be tied into the detention pond to help mitigate the overall runoff from the site. These areas will flow into 1,937 cubic feet proposed dry detention pond. The detention basin has been sized to accommodate flows associated with storm frequencies up to and including the 25 -year storm event as required in Section 1 of the City of Clearwater's Storm Drainage Design Criteria (SDDC) for detention ponds with outfalls. Test #1's infiltration rate was used in the design of the detention pond as it was the closest to the proposed detention pond location. Soil testing was not possible in the center of the proposed detention pond since the building currently occupies that location. The proposed parking area will be graded to flow towards the northwest corner of the site. The stormwater from the parking area will enter the pond from a catch basin in the northwest corner of the parking area. The stormwater will flow from the catch basin to the pond through a 10" reinforced concrete pipe. The existing building downspouts will be connected to underground 4" PVC pipe which will direct the flow to the detention pond. The outlet of both the catch basin outlet and the storm drain outlet will flow through a pipe end flare and treatment. The stormwater retained in the pond will exit the site through ground infiltration and a 15" diameter RCP outfall to the existing storm sewer along South Missouri Avenue. Rational The runoff calculations use the Rational Method, with the Zone 6 Rainfall Intensity- Duration- Frequency Curves to depict pre - development and post- development peak design flows as recommended in Section 8 of the SDDC. Given the relatively small subcatchments on the site and that the SDDC in Section 2 requires the use of the F -2 Overland Velocities for Various Land Use Types chart with a minimum time of concentration of 15 minutes, a time of concentration of 15 minutes was assumed for most of the site. Existing, pre- development runoff calculations used a Weighted Coefficient of Runoff of V2 the actual C value as allowed by the City of Clearwater as defined on the table in Section 8 of the SDDC for sites undergoing redevelopment and not contributing to an existing flooding problem. The 25 -year storm event was used for the design frequency to determine peak runoff flows as required by the SDDC in Section 1 for channels and detention areas with outfalls. The proposed detention area has a proposed outfall that connects to the existing storm sewer under South Missouri Avenue. A minimum storm duration of 60 minutes is required according to SDDC Section 8. According to the Zone 6 IDF curve chart the intensity for a 25 year storm using the Rational Method with a Duration of 60 minutes is 3.70 in/hr. Calculations HydroCAD calculations are provided for the existing and proposed conditions on site. These calculations demonstrate that the new flow patterns allow for less flow to leave the site in the redeveloped areas during the 25 -year storm than the existing conditions. The calculations also show that through infiltration the dry detention pond will drain out within 24 hours or less of the end of the 25 -year storm event. As can be seen in the proposed calculations, the dry detention pond has been modeled so that the peak elevation for the 25 -year storm event will reach 61.0 with the top of bank being 62.0, therefore there will be 1.0' of freeboard during the 25 -year storm event which is greater than the 6" of freeboard required in SDDC Section 8. This demonstrates that the detention pond can handle the volume of runoff generated by 25 -year storm without increasing offsite runoff. Separate HydroCAD calculations are provided for the treatment volume to demonstrate the system's ability to detain the first half an inch of runoff from the portion of the site undergoing redevelopment for the duration of the storm event as required by SDDC Section 8. Conclusion Using Weighted Coefficient of Runoff allowed by the SDDC for pre- development conditions, redevelopment of the 48,319 SF lot will result in higher runoff concentration over the predevelopment conditions. By using the proposed on -site dry detention area the presumed additional flow generated from redevelopment will be mitigated on site during the 25 -year storm. Flow off site from the redeveloped area is decreased in comparison to existing conditions through 0 the use of a dry detention pond with infiltration. The detention pond is designed to retain through infiltration 0.80 cfs of the 1.48 cfs flow that enters the pond during the 25 -year storm event. The other 0.68 cfs exits the pond through the outfall control structure and connects to the existing state storm sewer system. This is less than the 0.73 cfs that currently flows from the same areas during existing conditions. Therefore, all new runoff from the proposed redevelopment will be mitigated on site. This is shown in the HydroCAD calculations below. A summary of flow rates for the entire property are as follows: Note: Existing Condition and Proposed Southern Residential Properties flow rates were calculated using the SDDC Modified Weighted Coefficient of Runoff. Existing Conditions -- Peak Discharge Rates — ft /sec 25 -Year Storm Investigation Point 1- Northern Residential Properties 0.42 Investigation Point 2- South Missouri Avenue 0.21 Investigation Point 3- Southern Residential Properties 1.32 TOTALS 1.95 Post-development Peak Discharge Rates — ft /sec 25 -Year Storm Investigation Point 1- South Missouri Avenue 0.78 Investigation Point 2- Southern Residential Properties 1.01 TOTALS 1.79 INVESTIGATION POINT #2 I d Y =M c o 4 J E L L w ' -.... _ c 4 �aMtea, 3 d � m Z v � U '0 a 0 INVESTIGATION POINT #1 a W 4 4 .§ o a Oa LEGEND: 4) Gl ---- - - - - -- TIME OF CONCENTRATION PATH y o: n i_o a EXISTING OVERLAND FLOW PATH c a F a W AREA DRAINING SOUTH RESIDENTIAL c v W� AREA DRAINING TO SOUTH MISSOURI AVENUE d ; o CL O AREA DRAINING NORTH RESIDENTIAL a Sheet D.2 • • 1S Existing Building to be Removed 1 R 2S Private property (Investigation Point #1) Existing East Pavement & Canopy & Northern Lawn to be Removed 3S 2R Existing Paving to Street State Property (Investigation Point #2) 6S Existing Building to be Remain 13' Height 3R 4S Private Property Existing Building to be (Investigation Point #3) Remain 16.5' Height 5S Existing South, Southeast, and Southwest to Remain Subcat Reach Pond Link 7 Existing Conditions FL -City of Clearwater 25 -Year Duration =60 min, Inten =3.70 in /hr Prepared by Watefield Design Group, Inc. Page 2 HydroCADO 7.00 s/n 002870 C 1986 -2003 Applied Microcomputer Systems 7/1/2008 Time span =0.00 -2.00 hrs, dt =0.01 hrs, 201 points Runoff by Rational method, Rise /Fall= 1.0/1.0 xTc Reach routing by Stor- Ind +Trans method - Pond routing by Stor -Ind method Subcatchment 1S: Existing Building to be Removed Runoff Area =8,399 sf Runoff Depth= 1.78" Tc =15.0 min C =0.48 Runoff =0.35 cfs 0.029 of Subcatchment 2S: Existing East Pavement & Canopy & Northe Runoff Area =2,638 sf Runoff Depth= 1.18" Tc =15.0 min C =0.32 Runoff =0.07 cfs 0.006 of Subcatchment 3S: Existing Paving to Street Runoff Area =5,180 sf Runoff Depth= 1.78" Tc =15.0 min C =0.48 Runoff =0.21 cfs 0.018 of Subcatchment 4S: Existing Building to be Remain 16.5' Height Runoff Area =9,611 sf Runoff Depth= 1.78" Tc =15.0 min C =0.48 Runoff =0.40 cfs 0.033 of Subcatchment 5S: Existing South, Southeast, and Southwest Runoff Area = 14,884 sf Runoff Depth = 1.78" Tc =15.0 min C =0.48 Runoff =0.61 cfs 0.051 of Subcatchment 6S: Existing Building to be Remain 13' Height Runoff Area =7,559 sf Runoff Depth = 1.78" Tc =15.0 min C =0.48 Runoff =0.31 cfs 0.026 of Reach 1 R: Private property (Investigation Point #1) Inflow =0.42 cfs 0.035 of Outflow =0.42 cfs 0.035 of Reach 2R: State Property (investigation Point #2) Inflow =0.21 cfs 0.018 of Outflow =0.21 cfs 0.018 of Reach 3R: Private Property (Investigation Point #3) Inflow =1.32 cfs 0.109 of Oufflow =1.32 cfs 0.109 of Total Runoff Area =1.108 ac Runoff Volume= 0.161 of Average Runoff Depth =1.74" 8 Existing Conditions FL -City of Clearwater 25 -Year Duration =60 min, Inten =3.70 in /hr Prepared by Watefield Design Group, Inc. Page 3 HydroCADO 7.00 s/n 002870 © 1986 -2003 Applied Microcomputer Systems 7/1/2008 Subcatchment 1S: Existing Building to be Removed Runoff = 0.35 cfs @ 0.25 hrs, Volume= 0.029 af, Depth= 1.78" Runoff by Rational method, Rise /Fall= 1.0/1.0 xTc, Time Span= 0.00 -2.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs FL -City of Clearwater 25 -Year Duration =60 min, Inten =3.70 in /hr _ Area (sf) C Description 8,399 0.48 Existing Roof Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 15.0 Direct Entry, Roof Runoff 0.38 0.36 0.34 0.32 0.3 0.26 0.26 0.24 y 0.22 0.2 0 0.18 u 0.16 0.14 0.12 0.1 0.08 0.06 0.04 0.02 0 Subcatchment 1S: Existing Building to be Removed Hvdroprinh 0 1 Time (hours) 9 FL -City of Clearwater 25 -Year Duration =60 min, Inten =3.70 in /hr Runoff Area =8,399 sf Runoff Volume =0.029 of Runoff Depth= 1.78" Tc =15.0 min C =0.48 '�A - - ---- 2 Runoff 0 • Existing Conditions FL -City of Clearwater 25 -Year Duration =60 min, Inten =3.70 in /hr Prepared by Watefield Design Group, Inc. Page 4 HydroCADOO 7.00 s/n 002870 © 1986 -2003 Applied Microcomputer Systems 7/1/2008 Subcatchment 2S: Existing East Pavement & Canopy & Northern Lawn to be Removed Runoff = 0.07 cfs @ 0.25 hrs, Volume= 0.006 af, Depth= 1.18" Runoff by Rational method, Rise /Fall= 1.0/1.0 xTc, Time Span= 0.00 -2.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs FL -City of Clearwater 25 -Year Duration =60 min, Inten =3.70 in /hr Area (sf) C Description 1,506 0.48 Loading Dock and Aspalt in Front 1,132 0.10 Northern and Western Lawn 2,638 0.32 Weighted Average Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 15.0 Direct Entry, Paved Subcatchment 2S: Existing East Pavement & Canopy & Northern Lawn to be Removed 0.08- 0.075 0.07 I 0.07 0.065 0.06 0.055: 0.05 0.045 -: 3 0.04 0 0.035 = 0.03- 0.025 0.02-- 0.015 _ 0.01 - 0.005 0 0 1 Time (hours) 10 ity of Clearwater 25 -Year Duration =60 min, Inten =3.70 in /hr Runoff Area =2,638 sf Runoff Volume =0.006 of Runoff Depth = 1.18" Tc =15.0 min C =0.32 9 Runoff Existing Conditions FL -City of Clearwater 25 -Year Duration =60 min, Inten =3.70 in /hr Prepared by Watefield Design Group, Inc. Page 5 HydroCADO 7.00 s/n 002870 © 1986 -2003 Applied Microcomputer Systems 7/1/2008 Subcatchment 3S: Existing Paving to Street Runoff = 0.21 cfs @ 0.25 hrs, Volume= 0.018 af, Depth= 1.78" Runoff by Rational method, Rise /Fall= 1.0/1.0 xTc, Time Span= 0.00 -2.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs FL -City of Clearwater 25 -Year Duration =60 min, Inten =3.70 in /hr Area (sf) C Description 5,180 0.48 Canopy and Paved Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft /ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 15.0 Direct Entry, Paved 0.23 0.22 0.21 0.2 0.19 0.18 0.17 0.16 0.15 0.14 0.13 3 0.12 0 0.11 LL 0.1 0.09 0.08 0.07 0.06 0.05 0.04 0.03 0.02 0.01 0 Subcatchment 3S: Existing Paving to Street Hvdrnqraph 0 1 Time (hours) W FL -City of Clearwater 25 -Year Duration -60 min, Inten -3.70 in /hr Runoff Area -5,180 sf Runoff Volume -0.018 of Runoff Depth= 1.78" - Tc -15.0 min C_0.48 a 2 Runoff • 0 Existing Conditions FL -City of Clearwater 25 -Year Duration =60 min, Inten =3.70 in /hr Prepared by Watefield Design Group, Inc. Page 6 HydroCAD® 7.00 s/n 002870 © 1986 -2003 Applied Microcomputer Systems 7/1/2008 Runoff = Subcatchment 4S: Existing Building to be Remain 16.5' Height 0.40 cfs @ 0.25 hrs, Volume= 0.033 af, Depth= 1.78" Runoff by Rational method, Rise /Fall = 1.0/1.0 xTc, Time Span= 0.00 -2.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs FL -City of Clearwater 25 -Year Duration =60 min, Inten =3.70 in /hr Area (sf) C Description 9,611 0.48 Existing Roof Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 15.0 Direct Entry, Roof Runoff 0.44 0.42 0.4 0.38 0.36 0.34 0.32 0.3 0.28 0.26 0.24 3 0.22 0.2 LL 0.18 0.16 0.14 0.12 0.1 0.08 0.06 0.04 0.02 0 i Subcatchment 4S: Existing Building to be Remain 16.5' Height Hvdropror 1 FL -City of Clearwater 25 -Year Duration =60 min, Inten =3.70 in /hr Runoff Area =9,611 sf Runoff Volume =0.033 of Runoff Depth = 1.78" Tc =15.0 min C =0.48 Time (hours) 12 Runoff �I n Existing Conditions FL -City of Clearwater 25 -Year Duration =60 min, Inten =3.70 in /hr Prepared by Watefield Design Group, Inc. Page 7 HydroCADO 7.00 s/n 002870 © 1986 -2003 Applied Microcomputer Systems 7/1/2008 Subcatchment 5S: Existing South, Southeast, and Southwest to Remain Runoff = 0.61 cfs @ 0.25 hrs, Volume= 0.051 af, Depth= 1.78" Runoff by Rational method, Rise /Fall= 1.0/1.0 xTc, Time Span= 0.00 -2.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs FL -City of Clearwater 25 -Year Duration =60 min, Inten =3.70 in /hr Area (sf) C Description 14,884 0.48 Parking spaces with planters Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft /ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 15.0 Direct Entry, Parking with Planters 0.65 0.6 0.55 0.5 0.45 0.4 H 0.35 = 3 LL 0.3 0.25 0.2 0.15 0.1 0.05 0 0 Subcatchment 5S: Existing South, Southeast, and Southwest to Remain Hydroaraph 0.61 cfs 1 Time (hours) 13 FL -City of Clearwater 25 -Year Duration =60 min, Inten =3.70 in /hr Runoff Area = 14,884 sf Runoff Volume =0.051 of Runoff Depth = 1.78" Tc =15.0 min C =0.48 2 Runoff 0 i Existing Conditions FL -City of Clearwater 25 -Year Duration =60 min, Inten =3.70 in /hr Prepared by Watefield Design Group, Inc. Page 8 HydroCADOO 7.00 s/n 002870 © 1986 -2003 Applied Microcomputer Systems 7/1/2008 Subcatchment 6S: Existing Building to be Remain 13' Height Runoff = 0.31 cfs @ 0.25 hrs, Volume= 0.026 af, Depth= 1.78" Runoff by Rational method, Rise /Fall = 1.0/1.0 xTc, Time Span= 0.00 -2.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs FL -City of Clearwater 25 -Year Duration =60 min, Inten =3.70 in /hr Area (sf) C Description 7,559 0.48 Existing Roof Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft /ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 15.0 Direct Entry, Roof Runoff 0.34 0.32 - 0.3 0.28 0.26 0.24 0.22 n 0.2 ° 0.18 c 0.16 0.14 0.12 0.1 0.08 0.06 0.04 0.02 0 0 Subcatchment 6S: Existing Building to be Remain 13' Height 0.31 cfs I - FL -City of Clearwater 25 -Year Duration =60 min, Inten =3.70 in /hr Runoff Area =7,559 sf Runoff Volume =0.026 of _ Runoff Depth= 1.78" Tc =15.0 min - C =0.48 1 Time (hours) 14 E Runoff • • Existing Conditions FL -City of Clearwater 25 -Year Duration =60 min, Inten =3.70 in /hr Prepared by Watefield Design Group, Inc. Page 9 HydroCADO) 7.00 s/n 002870 © 1986 -2003 Applied Microcomputer Systems 7/1/2008 Reach 1 R: Private property (Investigation Point #1) Inflow Area = 0.253 ac, Inflow Depth = 1.63" for 25 -Year event Inflow = 0.42 cfs @ 0.25 hrs, Volume= 0.035 of Outflow = 0.42 cfs @ 0.25 hrs, Volume= 0.035 af, Atten= 0 %, Lag= 0.0 min Routing by Stor- Ind +Trans method, Time Span= 0.00 -2.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs 0.46 0.44 0.42 0.4 0.38 0.36 0.34 0.32 0.3 _ 0.28 0.26 0.24 c 0.22 LL 0.2 0.18 0.16 0.14 0.12 0.1 0.08 0.06 0.04 0.02 0 Reach 1 R: Private property (Investigation Point #1) Hy drugs . ,;.a; 1 Time (hours) 15 Inflow Outflow 0 Existing Conditions FL -City of Clearwater 25 -Year Duration =60 min, Inten =3.70 in /hr Prepared by Watefield Design Group, Inc. Page 10 HydroCADO 7.00 s/n 002870 © 1986 -2003 Applied Microcomputer Systems 7/1/2008 Reach 2R: State Property (Investigation Point #2) Inflow Area = 0.119 ac, Inflow Depth = 1.78" for 25 -Year event Inflow = 0.21 cfs @ 0.25 hrs, Volume= 0.018 of Outflow = 0.21 cfs Co-) 0.25 hrs, Volume= 0.018 af, Atten= 0 %, Lag= 0.0 min Routing by Stor- Ind +Trans method, Time Span= 0.00 -2.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs 0.23 0.22 0.21 0.2 0.19 0.18 0.17 0.16 0.15 0.14 N � 0.13 0.12 0 0.11 °' 0.1 0.09 0.08 0.07 0.06 0.05 0.04 0.03 0.02 0.01 0 Reach 2R: State Property (investigation Point #2) Time (hours) 16 Inflow Outflow Existing Conditions FL -City of Clearwater 25 -Year Duration =60 min, Inten =3.70 in /hr Prepared by Watefield Design Group, Inc. Page 11 HydroCADO 7.00 s/n 002870 © 1986 -2003 Applied Microcomputer Systems 7/1/2008 Reach 3R: Private Property (Investigation Point #3) Inflow Area = 0.736 ac, Inflow Depth = 1.78" for 25 -Year event Inflow = 1.32 cfs @ 0.25 hrs, Volume= 0.109 of Outflow = 1.32 cfs @ 0.25 hrs, Volume= 0.109 af, Atten= 0 %, Lag= 0.0 min Routing by Stor- Ind +Trans method, Time Span= 0.00 -2.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs N U 3 0 LL 1 0 0 Reach 3R: Private Property (Investigation Point #3) .132 cfs: .,ffflf %f17fi!ff 1.3'cfs ,� / f- Inflow Area =0.736 ac y. 1 Time (hours) 17 2 Inflow Outflow 6S [3R 2P , \ Q� -- ca ` - 1 P —� . 1 S Portion of Existing Roof Drain Retention Pond Catch Basin Proposed Parking and Building to Tie into (Pris odial) Landscaping Pond 3S - -- -- j [1- R Landscaped Front of State Property Building to Street (Investigation Point #1) 4S Existing Building to j Remain 12R iv Pr ate Property 5S (Investigation Point #2) Existing South, Southeast, and Southwest to Remain Subcat Reach l Pond Link Drainage Diagram for Proposed Conditions Prepared by Watefield Design Group, Inc. 7/1/2008 HydroCAD® 7.00 s/n 002870 ©1986 -2003 Applied Microcomputer Systems 18 • 0 Proposed Conditions FL -City of Clearwater 25 -Year Duration =60 min, Inten =3.70 in /hr Prepared by Watefield Design Group, Inc. Page 2 HydroCAD® 7.00 s/n 002870 © 1986 -2003 Applied Microcomputer Systems 7/1/2008 Time span =0.00 -2.00 hrs, dt =0.01 hrs, 201 points Runoff by Rational method, Rise /Fall = 1.0/1.0 xTc Reach routing by Stor- Ind +Trans method - Pond routing by Stor -Ind method Subcatchment 1S: Proposed Parking and Landscaping Runoff Area = 13,311 sf Runoff Depth= 2.81" Tc =15.0 min C =0.76 Runoff =0.87 cfs 0.072 of Subcatchment 3S: Landscaped Front of Building to Street Runoff Area =2,954 sf Runoff Depth = 1.44" Tc =15.0 min C =0.39 Runoff =0.10 cfs 0.008 of Subcatchment 4S: Existing Building to Remain Runoff Area =9,611 sf Runoff Depth= 1.78" Tc =15.0 min C =0.48 Runoff =0.40 cfs 0.033 of Subcatchment 5S: Existing South, Southeast, and Southwest Runoff Area= 14,884 sf Runoff Depth= 1.78" Tc =15.0 min C =0.48 Runoff =0.61 cfs 0.051 of Subcatchment 6S: Portion of Existing Building to Tie into Pon Runoff Area =7,559 sf Runoff Depth= 3.51" Tc =15.0 min C =0.95 Runoff =0.62 cfs 0.051 of Reach 1R: State Property (Investigation Point #1) Inflow =0.78 cfs 0.055 of Outflow =0.78 cfs 0.055 of Reach 2R: Private Property (Investigation Point #2) Inflow =1.01 cfs 0.083 of Outflow =1.01 cfs 0.083 of Reach 3R: Roof Drain Peak Depth =0.19' Max Vet =12.1 fps Inflow =0.62 cfs 0.051 of D =4.0" n =0.011 L =15.0' S=0.2000'/' Capacity =1.01 cfs Outflow =0.62 cfs 0.051 of Pond 1 P: Catch Basin Peak Elev= 61.62' Inflow =0.87 cfs 0.072 of 10.0" x 4.0' Culvert Outflow =0.87 cfs 0.072 of Pond 2P: Retention Pond (Prismodial) Peak Elev= 60.95' Storage =510 cf Inflow =1.48 cfs 0.122 of Discarded =0.80 cfs 0.075 of Primary=0.68 cfs 0.047 of Outflow =1.48 cfs 0.122 of Total Runoff Area -1.109 ac Runoff Volume = 0.214 of Average Runoff Depth = 2.31" 19 Proposed Conditions FL -City of Clearwater 25 -Year Duration =60 min, Inten =3.70 in /hr Prepared by Watefield Design Group, Inc. Page 3 HydroCADOO 7.00 s/n 002870 © 1986 -2003 Applied Microcomputer Systems 7/1/2008 Subcatchment 1S: Proposed Parking and Landscaping Runoff = 0.87 cfs @ 0.25 hrs, Volume= 0.072 af, Depth= 2.81" Runoff by Rational method, Rise /Fall= 1.0/1.0 xTc, Time Span= 0.00 -2.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs FL -City of Clearwater 25 -Year Duration =60 min, Inten =3.70 in /hr Area (sf) C Description 8,464 0.95 Parking and Concrete Walkway 1,632 0.20 Landscaping 1,375 1.00 Retention Pond 368 0.20 Landscaping 1,472 0.20 Landscaping 13,311 0.76 Weighted Average Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft /ft) (ft /sec) (cfs) 15.0 Direct Entry, Assumed from CL SDC 0.95 0.9 0.85 0.8 0.75 0.7 0.65 0.6 ,i 0.55 0.5 0 0.45 u. 0.4 0.35 0.3 0.25 0.2 0.15 0.1 0.05 0 0 Subcatchment 1S: Proposed Parking and Landscaping FL -City of Clearwater 25 -Year Duration -60 min, Inten -3.70 in /hr Runoff Area= 13,311 sf Runoff Volume -0.072 of Runoff Depth= 2.81" Tc_15.0 min - - - - -- C -0.76 1 Time (hours) 20 Y1 - - - - 2 Runoff • • Proposed Conditions FL -City of Clearwater 25 -Year Duration =60 min, Inten =3.70 in /hr Prepared by Watefield Design Group, Inc. Page 4 HydroCADOO 7.00 s/n 002870 © 1986 -2003 Applied Microcomputer Systems 7/1/2008 Subcatchment 3S: Landscaped Front of Building to Street Runoff = 0.10 cfs Cad 0.25 hrs, Volume= 0.008 af, Depth= 1.44" Runoff by Rational method, Rise /Fall= 1.0/1.0 xTc, Time Span= 0.00 -2.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs FL -City of Clearwater 25 -Year Duration =60 min, Inten =3.70 in /hr Area (sf) C Description 2,199 0.20 Landscaped Area to Street 75 0.95 Asphault 680 0.95 Canopy 2,954 0.39 Weighted Average Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft /ft) (ft /sec) (cfs) 15.0 Direct Entry, Landscaped Area 0.11 0.105 0.1 0.095 0.09 0.085 0.075 0.07 0.065 m 0 0.06 3 0.055 —° 0.05 a 0.045 0.04 0.035 0.03 0.025 0.02 0.015 0.01 0.005 0 0 Subcatchment 3S: Landscaped Front of Building to Street - �raF, 0.10 cfs FL -City of Clearwater 25 -Year - - Duration =60 min, Inten =3.70 in /hr Runoff Area =2,954 sf Runoff Volume =0.008 of Runoff Depth = 1.44" Tc =15.0 min C -0.39 1 Time (hours) 21 Runoff Proposed Conditions FL -City of Clearwater 25 -Year Duration =60 min, Inten =3.70 in /hr Prepared by Watefield Design Group, Inc. Page 5 HydroCADOO 7.00 s/n 002870 © 1986 -2003 Applied Microcomputer Systems 7/1/2008 Subcatchment 4S: Existing Building to Remain Runoff = 0.40 cfs @ 0.25 hrs, Volume= 0.033 af, Depth= 1.78" Runoff by Rational method, Rise /Fall= 1.0/1.0 xTc, Time Span= 0.00 -2.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs FL -City of Clearwater 25 -Year Duration =60 min, Inten =3.70 in /hr Area (sf) C Description 9,611 0.48 Existing Roof Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description _ (min) (feet) (ft /ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 15.0 Direct Entry, Roof Runoff 0.44 0.42 o.ao crs ' 0.38 0.36 0.34 0.32 0.3 0.28 0.26 0.24 3 0.22 C 0.2 LL 0.18 0.16 0.14- 0 -12 0.1 0.08 0.06 0.04 0.02 0 0 Subcatchment 4S: Existing Building to Remain Hydrogra- 1 Time (hours) 22 FL -City of Clearwater 25 -Year Duration =60 min, Inten =3.70 in /hr Runoff Area =9,611 sf Runoff Volume =0.033 of Runoff Depth= 1.78" Tc =15.0 min C =0.48 Runoff Proposed Conditions FL -City of Clearwater 25 -Year Duration =60 min, Inten =3.70 in /hr Prepared by Watefield Design Group, Inc. Page 6 HydroCADOO 7.00 s/n 002870 © 1986 -2003 Applied Microcomputer Systems 7/1/2008 Subcatchment 5S: Existing South, Southeast, and Southwest to Remain Runoff = 0.61 cfs @ 0.25 hrs, Volume= 0.051 af, Depth= 1.78" Runoff by Rational method, Rise /Fall = 1.0/1.0 xTc, Time Span= 0.00 -2.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs FL -City of Clearwater 25 -Year Duration =60 min, Inten =3.70 in /hr Area (sf) C Description 14,884 0.48 Parking spaces with planters Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft /ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 15.0 Direct Entry, Parking with Planters 0.65 0.6 0.55 0.5 0.45 N 0.4 0.35 3 0 LL 0.3 0.25 0.2 0.15 0.1 0.05 0 Subcatchment 5S: Existing South, Southeast, and Southwest to Remain ; 0.61 cfs I♦ Time (hours) 23 FL -City of Clearwater 25 -Year Duration =60 min, Inten =3.70 in /hr Runoff Area = 14,884 sf Runoff Volume =0.051 of _ Runoff Depth =1.78" Tc =15.0 min C =0.48 Runoff Proposed Conditions FL -City of Clearwater 25 -Year Duration =60 min, Inten =3.70 in /hr Prepared by Watefield Design Group, Inc. Page 7 HydroCADO 7.00 s/n 002870 © 1986 -2003 Applied Microcomputer Systems 7/1/2008 Subcatchment 6S: Portion of Existing Building to Tie into Pond Runoff = 0.62 cfs @ 0.25 hrs, Volume= 0.051 af, Depth= 3.51" Runoff by Rational method, Rise /Fall= 1.0/1.0 xTc, Time Span= 0.00 -2.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs FL -City of Clearwater 25 -Year Duration =60 min, Inten =3.70 in /hr Area (sf) C Description 7,559 0.95 Existing Building Tying into Pond Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft /ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 15.0 Direct Entry, Roof Runoff Subcatchment 6S: Portion of Existing Building to Tie into Pond HvdrOC!rq.nh Runoff 0.65 0.62 cfs 0.6 ' FL -City of Clearwater 25 -Year 0.55 Duration =60 min, 0.5 - - - Inten =3.70 in /hr 0.45 Runoff Area =7,559 sf 0.4 - - Runoff Volume =0.051 of N 0.35 Runoff Depth= 3.51" FL 0.3 Tc =15.0 min 0.25 =0.95 0.2 0.15 0.1 0.05 0 - 0 1 2 Time (hours) 24 0 0 Proposed Conditions FL -City of Clearwater 25 -Year Duration =60 min, Inten =3.70 in /hr Prepared by Watefield Design Group, Inc. Page 8 HydroCADO 7.00 s/n 002870 © 1986 -2003 Applied Microcomputer Systems 7/1/2008 Reach 1 R: State Property (Investigation Point #1) Inflow Area = 0.547 ac, Inflow Depth = 1.21" for 25 -Year event Inflow = 0.78 cfs Ca) 1.00 hrs, Volume= 0.055 of Outflow = 0.78 cfs @ 1.00 hrs, Volume= 0.055 af, Atten= 0 %, Lag= 0.0 min Routing by Stor- Ind +Trans method, Time Span= 0.00 -2.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs 0.85 0.8 0.75 0.7 0.65 0.6 0.55 w 0.5 ° 0.45 0 0.4 LL 0.35 0.3 0.25 0.2 0.15 0.1 0.05 0 0 Reach 1 R: State Property (Investigation Point #1) 1 Time (hours) 25 I Inflow Outflow Proposed Conditions FL -City of Clearwater 25 -Year Duration =60 min, Inten =3.70 in /hr Prepared by Watefield Design Group, Inc. Page 9 HydroCADOO 7.00 s/n 002870 © 1986 -2003 Applied Microcomputer Systems 7/1/2008 Reach 2R: Private Property (Investigation Point #2) Inflow Area = 0.562 ac, Inflow Depth = 1.78" for 25 -Year event Inflow = 1.01 cfs @ 0.25 hrs, Volume= 0.083 of Outflow = 1.01 cfs @ 0.25 hrs, Volume= 0.083 af, Atten= 0 %, Lag= 0.0 min Routing by Stor- Ind +Trans method, Time Span= 0.00 -2.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Vl U 3 0 LL 0 0 0 1 2 Time (hours) Reach 2R: Private Property (Investigation Point #2) 26 Inflow Outflow • Proposed Conditions FL -City of Clearwater 25 -Year Duration =60 min, Inten =3.70 in /hr Prepared by Watefield Design Group, Inc. Page 10 HydroCADO 7.00 s/n 002870 ©1986 -2003 Applied Microcomputer Systems 7/1/2008 Reach 3R: Roof Drain Inflow Area = 0.174 ac, Inflow Depth = 3.51" for 25 -Year event Inflow = 0.62 cfs @ 0.25 hrs, Volume= 0.051 of Outflow = 0.62 cfs @ 0.26 hrs, Volume= 0.051 af, Atten= 0 %, Lag= 0.6 min Routing by Stor -Ind +Trans method, Time Span= 0.00 -2.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Max. Velocity= 12.1 fps, Min. Travel Time= 0.0 min Avg. Velocity = 11.1 fps, Avg. Travel Time= 0.0 min Peak Depth= 0.19'@ 0.26 hrs Capacity at bank full= 1.01 cfs Inlet Invert= 63.00', Outlet Invert= 60.00' 4.0" Diameter Pipe n= 0.011 Length= 15.0' Slope= 0.20007' Reach 3R: Roof Drain €-lydregra;: t Inflow i, 4 Outflow °fi5 r 01`' Inflow Area= 0.174 ac 0.6- - Peak Depth -0.19' °.55 _ 0.5 = - = Max Vel_12.1 fps r ,R a 0.4 V n -0.011 0.35 L =15.0' 0.3- yP 0.25 S= 0.2000 '/' 02 - .�"'�iy Capacity_1.01 cfs 0.15,, 0.05 0 ,. 0 1 2 Time (hours) 27 • i Proposed Conditions FL -City of Clearwater 25 -Year Duration =60 min, Inten =3.70 in /hr Prepared by Watefield Design Group, Inc. Page 11 HydroCADO 7.00 s/n 002870 © 1986 -2003 Applied Microcomputer Systems 7/1/2008 Pond 1P: Catch Basin Inflow Area = 0.306 ac, Inflow Depth = 2.81" for 25 -Year event Inflow = 0.87 cfs @ 0.25 hrs, Volume= 0.072 of Outflow = 0.87 cfs Co) 0.25 hrs, Volume= 0.072 af, Atten= 0 %, Lag= 0.0 min Primary = 0.87 cfs @ 0.25 hrs, Volume= 0.072 of Routing by Stor -Ind method, Time Span= 0.00 -2.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Peak Elev= 61.62' @ 0.25 hrs Flood Elev= 63.00' Plug -Flow detention time= 0.0 min calculated for 0.072 of (100% of inflow) Center -of -Mass det. time= 0.0 min ( 37.5 - 37.5 ) # Routing Invert Outlet Devices 1 Primary 61.00' 10.0" x 4.0' long Culvert Ke= 1.000 Outlet Invert= 60.00' S= 0.25007' n= 0.011 Cc= 0.900 Primary OutFlow Max =0.87 cfs @ 0.25 hrs HW= 61.62' (Free Discharge) t-1= Culvert (Inlet Controls 0.87 cfs @ 2.0 fps) Pond 1 P: Catch Basin 0.35 yR) 0.3 0.25 0.2 0.15 0.1> 0.05 _* ky' 0 1 Time (hours) 28 F_t Inflow Primary Inflow Aro2=0.306 ac Peak Elev= 61.62' 10.0" x 4.0' Culvert 4 0 i Proposed Conditions FL -City of Clearwater 25 -Year Duration =60 min, Inten =3.70 in /hr Prepared by Watefield Design Group, Inc. Page 12 HydroCADOO 7.00 s/n 002870 © 1986 -2003 Applied Microcomputer Systems 7/1/2008 Pond 2P: Retention Pond (Prismodial) Inflow Area = 0.479 ac, Inflow Depth = 3.07" for 25 -Year event Inflow = 1.48 cfs @ 0.26 hrs, Volume= 0.122 of Outflow = 1.48 cfs @ 1.00 hrs, Volume= 0.122 af, Atten= 0 %, Lag= 44.4 min Discarded = 0.80 cfs @ 1.00 hrs, Volume= 0.075 of Primary = 0.68 cfs @ 1.00 hrs, Volume= 0.047 of Routing by Stor -Ind method, Time Span= 0.00 -2.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Peak Elev= 60.95' @ 1.00 hrs Surf.Area= 1,214 sf Storage= 510 cf Plug -Flow detention time= 5.7 min calculated for 0.122 of (100% of inflow) Center -of -Mass det. time= 5.7 min ( 43.3 - 37.5 ) # Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description 1 60.00' 1,937 cf 2.00'W x 119.00'L x 2.00'H Prismatoid Z =4.0 2,583 cf Overall x 75.0% Voids # Routing Invert Outlet Devices 1 Primary 60.50' 15.0" x 90.0' long Culvert Ke= 1.000 Outlet Invert= 58.25' S=0.0250'/' n=0.013 Cc= 0.900 2 Discarded 0.00' 0.038750 fpm Exfiltration over entire Wetted area Discarded OutFlow Max =0.80 cfs @ 1.00 hrs HW= 60.95' (Free Discharge) L2 =Exfiltration (Exfiltration Controls 0.80 cfs) Primary OutFlow Max =0.68 cfs @ 1.00 hrs HW= 60.95' (Free Discharge) t1 =Culvert (Inlet Controls 0.68 cfs @ 1.7 fps) 29 Proposed Conditions FL -City of Clearwater 25 -Year Duration =60 min, Inten =3.70 in /hr Prepared by Watefield Design Group, Inc. Page 13 HydroCADO 7.00 s/n 002870 © 1986 -2003 Applied Microcomputer Systems 7/1/2008 Pond 2P: Retention Pond (Prismodial) Ul U 3 0 LL 0 1--- 0 1.48 cfs 48o1s Inflow Area -0.479 ac f Peak Elev_60.95' Story J e -510 cf 1 Time (hours) 30 11 fed cB 6S __ 3R 2P 1 P (1 S Portion of Existing Roof Drain Retention Pond Catch Basin Proposed Parking and Building to Tie into (Prismodial) Landscaping Pond Subcat, R Pond Lltli( Drainage Diagram for Proposed treatment of first half inch of rainfall J Prepared by Watefield Design Group, Inc. 7/1/2008 HydroCADO 7.00 s/n 002870 © 1986 -2003 Applied Microcomputer Systems 31 • Proposed treatment of first half inch of rainfall Rainfall Duration =60 min, Inten =0.50 in /hr Prepared by Watefield Design Group, Inc. Page 2 HydroCADO 7.00 s/n 002870 © 1986 -2003 Applied Microcomputer Systems 7/1/2008 Time span =0.00 -2.00 hrs, dt =0.01 hrs, 201 points Runoff by Rational method, Rise /Fall= 1.0/1.0 xTc Reach routing by Stor- Ind +Trans method - Pond routing by Stor -Ind method Subcatchment 1S: Proposed Parking and Landscaping Runoff Area = 13,311 sf Runoff Depth = 0.38" Tc =15.0 min C =0.76 Runoff =0.12 cfs 0.010 of Subcatchment 6S: Portion of Existing Building to Tie into Pon Runoff Area =7,559 sf Runoff Depth = 0.47" Tc =15.0 min C =0.95 Runoff =0.08 cfs 0.007 of Reach 3R: Roof Drain Peak Depth =0.07' Max Vet =6.0 fps Inflow =0.08 cfs 0.007 of D =4.0" n =0.011 L =15.0' S=0.1333'/' Capacity =0.82 cfs Outflow =0.08 cfs 0.007 of Pond 1 P: Catch Basin Peak EIev= 62.20' Inflow =0.12 cfs 0.010 of 10.0" x 4.0' Culvert Outflow =0.12 cfs 0.010 of Pond 2P: Retention Pond (Prismodial) Peak EIev= 60.07' Storage =15 cf Inflow =0.20 cfs 0.017 of Discarded =0.20 cfs 0.017 of Primary--0.00 cfs 0.000 of Outflow =0.20 cfs 0.017 of Total Runoff Area = 0.479 ac Runoff Volume= 0.017 of Average Runoff Depth= 0.41" 32 • • Proposed treatment of first half inch of rainfall Rainfall Duration =60 min, Inten =0.50 in /hr Prepared by Watefield Design Group, Inc. Page 3 HydroCAD® 7.00 s/n 002870 © 1986 -2003 Applied Microcomputer Systems 7/1/2008 Subcatchment IS: Proposed Parking and Landscaping Runoff = 0.12 cfs C) 0.25 hrs, Volume= 0.010 af, Depth= 0.38" Runoff by Rational method, Rise /Fall= 1.0/1.0 xTc, Time Span= 0.00 -2.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Rainfall Duration =60 min, Inten =0.50 in /hr Area (sf) C Description 8,464 0.95 Parking and Concrete Walkway 1,632 0.20 Landscaping 1,375 1.00 Retention Pond 368 0.20 Landscaping 1,472 0.20 Landscaping 13,311 0.76 Weighted Average Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description _ (min) (feet) (ft /ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 15.0 Direct Entry, Assumed from CL SDC 0.13 0.125 0.12 0.115 0.11 0.105 0.1 0.095 0.085 0.08 m0.075 0.07 3 0.065 0.06 " 0.055 0.05 0.045 0.035 0.03 0.025 0.02 0.015 0.01 0.005 0 0 Subcatchment 1S: Proposed Parking and Landscaping iy drogra,: - 1 Time (hours) 33 Rainfall Duration -60 min, Inten -0.50 in /hr Runoff Area_13,311 sf 'unoff Volume -0.010 of Runoff Depth= 0.38" 4 Tc -15.0 min C =0.76 2 Runoff 9 0 Proposed treatment of first half inch of rainfall Rainfall Duration =60 min, Inten =0.50 in /hr Prepared by Watefield Design Group, Inc. Page 4 HydroCAD® 7.00 s/n 002870 © 1986 -2003 Applied Microcomputer Systems 7/1/2008 Subcatchment 6S: Portion of Existing Building to Tie into Pond Runoff = 0.08 cfs @ 0.25 hrs, Volume= 0.007 af, Depth= 0.47" Runoff by Rational method, Rise /Fall= 1.0/1.0 xTc, Time Span= 0.00 -2.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Rainfall Duration =60 min, Inten =0.50 in /hr Area (sf) C Description 7,559 0.95 Existing Building Tying into Pond Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft /ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 15.0 Direct Entry, Roof Runoff 0.09 0.085 0.08 0.075 0.07 0.065 0.06 r 0.055 w 0.05 u 0.045 0.04 0.035 0.03 0.025 0.02 0.015 - 0.01- 0� 0 Subcatchment 6S: Portion of Existing Building to Tie into Pond Time (hours) 34 Rainfall Duration =60 min, Inten =0.50 in /hr Runoff Area =7,559 sf noff Volume =0.007 of Runoff Depth =0.47' Tc =15.0 min C =0.95 2 Runoff • i Proposed treatment of first half inch of rainfall Rainfall Duration =60 min, Inten =0.50 in /hr Prepared by Watefield Design Group, Inc. Page 5 HydroCADOO 7.00 s/n 002870 © 1986 -2003 Applied Microcomputer Systems 7/1/2008 Reach 313: Roof Drain Inflow Area = 0.174 ac, Inflow Depth = 0.47" Inflow = 0.08 cfs @ 0.25 hrs, Volume= 0.007 of Outflow = 0.08 cfs @ 0.26 hrs, Volume= 0.007 af, Atten= 0 %, Lag= 0.6 min Routing by Stor -Ind +Trans method, Time Span= 0.00 -2.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Max. Velocity= 6.0 fps, Min. Travel Time= 0.0 min Avg. Velocity = 5.5 fps, Avg. Travel Time= 0.0 min Peak Depth= 0.07'9 0.26 hrs Capacity at bank full= 0.82 cfs Inlet Invert= 62.00', Outlet Invert= 60.00' 4.0" Diameter Pipe n=0.011 Length= 15.0' Slope= 0.1333 '/' 0.09 0.085. 0.08 0.075 0.07 0.055 N 0.05 c 0.045 LL n na 0.01 0.005 0 0 Reach 3R: Roof Drain 0.08 efa Irirluw /firmed -0.174 ac Peak Depth -0.07' Max Vet -6.0 fps D =4.0" n -0.011 L=15.0' S=0.1333'/' r Capacity -0.82 cfs 1 Time (hours) 35 V.7 Inflow Outflow Proposed treatment of first half inch of rainfall Rainfall Duration =60 min, Inten =0.50 in /hr Prepared by Watefield Design Group, Inc. Page 6 HydroCADO 7.00 s/n 002870 © 1986 -2003 Applied Microcomputer Systems 7/1/2008 Pond 1 P: Catch Basin Inflow Area = 0.306 ac, Inflow Depth = 0.38" Inflow = 0.12 cfs @ 0.25 hrs, Volume= 0.010 of Outflow = 0.12 cfs @ 0.25 hrs, Volume= 0.01Oaf, Atten= 0 %, Lag= 0.0 min Primary = 0.12 cfs @ 0.25 hrs, Volume= 0.010 of Routing by Stor -Ind method, Time Span= 0.00 -2.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Peak Elev= 62.20'@ 0.25 hrs Flood Elev= 63.00' Plug -Flow detention time= (not calculated) Center -of -Mass det. time= (not calculated) # Routing Invert Outlet Devices 1 Primary 62.00' 10.0" x 4.0' long Culvert Ke= 1.000 Outlet Invert= 61.00' S=0.2500'/' n=0.011 Cc= 0.900 Primary OutFlow Max =0.12 cfs @ 0.25 hrs HW= 62.20' (Free Discharge) Li =Culvert (Inlet Controls 0.12 cfs @ 1.1 fps) 0.13 nip 0.11 0.1 0.09 0.08 0.07 0 0.06 LL 0.05 0.04 0.03 0.02 0.01 0 0 Pond 1P: Catch Basin 1 Time (hours) KE Inflow ,Area•0.306 ac Peak Elev= 62.20' 10.0" x 4.0' Culvert 2 Inflow Primary • • Proposed treatment of first half inch of rainfall Rainfall Duration =60 min, Inten =0.50 in /hr Prepared by Watefield Design Group, Inc. Page 7 HydroCADO 7.00 s/n 002870 © 1986 -2003 Applied Microcomputer Systems 7/1/2008 Pond 2P: Retention Pond (Prismodial) Inflow Area = 0.479 ac, Inflow Depth = 0.41" Inflow = 0.20 cfs @ 0.26 hrs, Volume= 0.017 of Outflow = 0.20 cfs @ 1.00 hrs, Volume= 0.017 af, Atten= 0 %, Lag= 44.4 min Discarded = 0.20 cfs @ 1.00 hrs, Volume= 0.017 of Primary = 0.00 cfs @ 0.00 hrs, Volume= 0.000 of Routing by Stor -Ind method, Time Span= 0.00 -2.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Peak Elev= 60.07'@ 1.00 hrs Surf.Area= 308 sf Storage= 15 cf Plug -Flow detention time= 1.0 min calculated for 0.016 of (100% of inflow) Center -of -Mass det. time= 1.0 min ( 38.5 - 37.5 ) # Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description 1 60.00' 1,937 cf 2.00'W x 119.00'L x 2.00'H Prismatoid Z =4.0 2,583 cf Overall x 75.0% Voids # Routing Invert Outlet Devices 1 Primary 60.50' 15.0" x 90.0' long Culvert Ke= 1.000 Outlet Invert= 58.25' S=0.0250'/' n=0.013 Cc= 0.900 2 Discarded 0.00' 0.038750 fpm Exfiltration over entire Wetted area Discarded OutFlow Max =0.20 cfs @ 1.00 hrs HW= 60.07' (Free Discharge) t2 =Exfiltration (Exfiltration Controls 0.20 cfs) Primary OutFlow Max =0.00 cfs @ 0.00 hrs HW= 60.00' (Free Discharge) t--1 =Culvert ( Controls 0.00 cfs) 37 J Proposed treatment of first half inch of rainfall Rainfall Duration =60 min, Inten =0.50 in /hr Prepared by Watefield Design Group, Inc. Page 8 HydroCADOO 7.00 s/n 002870 © 1986 -2003 Applied Microcomputer Systems 7/1/2008 0.22 0.21 0.2 0.19 0.18 0.17- 0.16 0.15 0.14 0.13- , 0.12 3 0.11 - 0.1 a 0.09 0.08 -. 0.07- 0.06 - 0.05 - 0.04 0.03 0.02 n n nn rf� 0.1 0 Pond 2P: Retention Pond (Prismodial) 0.20 d9 �'' °Z° °'S Inflow Area_0.479 ac w , o.zo cts Peak Elev= 60.07' Storage -15 cf 1 J 1 2 Time (hours) 38 Inflow Outflow Discarded Primary ! i Appendix -- - - - -211.10M....... I Hydrology Handbook January 2004 F -2 Overland Flow Velocities for Various Land Use Types 11111111111111MIll } C L 70 a- t u 60 0 W z z a w 50 w 0 CC w a 40 30 . 20 AVERAGE SLOPE OF TERRAIN (Percent) - Poved Municipal- Highly Developed • •• Municipot- Residential - -- Rural- Cultiwoted Wooded -Low Storage - - -- Wooded -High Storage B -24 0 r 0 CITY OF CLEARWATER NOTICE OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD PUBLIC HEARINGS The Community Development Board of the City of Clearwater, Florida, will hold public hearings on Tuesday, September 16, 2008, beginning at 1:00 p.m., in the City Council Chambers, in City Hall, 3rd floor, 112 South Osceola Ave, Clearwater, Florida, to consider the following requests: NOTE: All persons wishing to address an item need to be present at the BEGINNING of the meeting. Those cases that are not contested by the applicant, staff, neighboring property owners, etc. will be placed on a consent agenda and approved by a single vote at the beginning of the meeting. 1. BVG Acquisition Inc. (Marc Mariano and Bryan Zarlenga, Tampa Bay Engineering Group Inc.) are requesting Flexible Development approval for the redevelopment of the overall 31.12 acre - property zoned Commercial (C) District, Office (0) District and proposed Medium High Density Residential (MHDR) District (companion rezoning Case No. REZ2008- 07007) to permit a total of 229 attached dwellings (Independent Living Units) (73 units existing to remain; 156 units proposed), a total of 40 nursing home beds (proposed) and a total of 170 beds of assisted living facility (94 beds existing to remain; 76 beds proposed); (A) In the Commercial (C) District with a lot area of 2.45 acres, a lot width of 200 feet along Gulf to Bay Blvd (north) and a total of 210 ft along Cross Blvd, a front (north) setback along Gulf to Bay Blvd of 4 feet (to existing sign) and 28 ft (to existing pavement), a front (east) setback along Cross Blvd of 1 -foot (to existing pavement), a front (north) setback along Cross Blvd of 25 ft (to proposed guardhouse), a side (east) setback of 5 ft (to existing pavement), a side (west) setback of 2 ft (to existing pavement), a side (north) setback of zero feet (to existing pavement) and a building height of 81 ft (to roof deck of existing assisted living facility building), as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project in the Commercial (C) District, under the provisions of Sec 2- 704.C; (B) A lot area of 28.33 acres, a lot width along Sky Harbor Dr. of 282 ft, a reduction to the front (west) setback along Sky Harbor Dr. from 25 to 21 ft (to existing building), an increase to building height from 30 to 82 ft (to top of roof of proposed building) and a reduction to the required number of parking spaces from 583 to 426 parking spaces, as a Residential Infill Project in the proposed Medium High Density Residential (MHDR) District, under the provisions of Sec. 2- 304.G; and (C) Reductions to perimeter buffers along Cross Blvd (east) from 10 ft to 1 -ft (to existing pavement), along the east side from 7 to 5 feet (to existing pavement), along the west side from 5 to 2 ft (to existing pavement), along the north side from 10 ft to zero feet (to existing pavement) and at the southeast corner of the adjacent nursing home parcel from 10 ft to 5 ft (to proposed pavement), as a Comprehensive Landscape Program under the provisions of Sec 3- 1202.G. [Proposed Use: 229 attached dwellings (Independent Living Units) (73 units existing to remain; 156 units proposed), a total of 40 nursing home beds (proposed) and a total of 170 beds of assisted living facility (94 beds existing to remain; 76 beds proposed] at 2855 Gulf to Bay Blvd, Baskin's Replat Resub pt of lot 2 desc from NE cor of lot 1 TH E 60FT & S 190FT for the POB TH E 132.2FT. Assigned Planner: Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Planner III. FLD2008 -05012 2. Harrison, George Realty Co. (Dr. Kazi Hassan) are requesting Flexible Development approval for a medical clinic within the Commercial (C) District with a lot area of 48,320 square feet, a lot width of 512 feet, a building height of 25 feet, front (east) setbacks of 9.58 feet (to building) and 11 feet (to parking), side (north) setbacks of 149 feet (to building) and 10 feet (to parking), side (south) setbacks of 116 feet (to building) and 5.99 feet (to parking), rear (west) setbacks of 4.47 feet (to building) and 2.5 feet (to parking), with 47 off - street parking spaces as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project as per Community Development Code Section 2- 0 , , • 704.C.. (Proposed Use: Medical Clinic) at 1314 South Missouri Avenue, Lakeview Heights Blk E, Lots 17 thru 24 Incl & Blk J, Lot 24 & E '' /z Vac Alley Lying Between Blks E & J Less E 10 ft for Rd. Assigned Planner: Robert G. Tefft, Development Review Manager. FLD2008 -07021 3. City of Clearwater are requesting Flexible Development approval for a public facility use within the Institutional (I) District with a lot area of 283,140 square feet, a lot width of 1,075 feet, a maximum building height of 50 feet, front (east) setbacks of 16 feet (to building) and 20 feet (to pavement), side (north) setbacks of 123 feet (to building) and zero feet (to existing pavement), side (south) setbacks of 153 feet (to building) and 11 feet (to pavement), and rear (west) setbacks of 260 feet (to building) and 60 feet (to pavement), with 37 off - street parking spaces as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project as per Community Development Code Section 2- 1204.A; as well as a waiver to the interior landscaping requirements, and a partial waiver to the perimeter landscaping requirements where the existing landscape materials would be determined to be an acceptable perimeter buffer, as a Comprehensive Landscape Program under the provisions of Community Development Code Section 3- 1202.G. (Proposed Use: Public Facility) at 1640 N. Arcturas Ave., Pinellas Groves Nw 1/4, Lot 12, part of Lot 5 Less Rd On E part of Lot 6, part of Lot 11, a 15 Ft Vac Rd on S of Lot 11 & 12 (12/29/15/70182 /200/81200) Assigned Planner: Scott Kurleman, Planner III. FLD2008 -08028 Interested parties may appear and be heard at the hearing or file written notice of approval or objection with the Planning Director or City Clerk prior to the hearing. Any person who decides to appeal any decision made by the Board or Council, with respect to any matter considered at such hearings, will need to request a record of the proceedings and, for such purpose, may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and 'evidence upon which the appeal is to be based per Florida Statute 286.0105. Community Development Code Sec 4 -206 states that party status shall be granted by the Board in quasi-judicial cases if the person requesting such status demonstrates that s/he is substantially affected. Party status entitles parties to personally testify, present evidence, argument and witnesses, cross - examine witnesses, appeal the decision and speak on reconsideration requests, and needs to be requested and obtained during the case discussion before the CDB. An oath will be administered swearing in all persons giving testimony in quasi-judicial public hearing cases. If you wish to speak at the meeting, please wait to be recognized, then state and spell your name and provide your address. Persons without party status speaking before the CDB shall be limited to three minutes unless an individual is representing a group in which case the Chairperson may authorize a reasonable amount of time up to 10 minutes. Five days prior to the meeting, staff reports and recommendations on the above requests will be available for review by interested parties between the hours of 8:30 a.m. and 4:30 p.m., weekdays, at the City of Clearwater, Planning Department, 100 S. Myrtle Ave., Clearwater, FL 33756. Please contact the case presenter, at 562 -4567 to discuss any questions or concerns about the project and/or to better understand the proposal and review the site plan. Michael Delk Cynthia E. Goudeau, MMC Planning Director City Clerk City of Clearwater P.O. Box 4748, Clearwater, FL 33758 -4748 NOTE: Applicant or representative must be present at the hearing. • A COPY OF THIS AD IN LARGE PRINT IS AVAILABLE IN OFFICIAL RECORDS AND LEGISLATIVE SERVICES. ANY PERSON WITH A DISABILITY REQUIRING REASONABLE ACCOMMODATION IN ORDER TO PARTICIPATE IN THIS MEETING SHOULD CALL (727) 562 -4093 WITH THEIR REQUEST. To learn more about presenting to Clearwater boards and City Council, go to http:// clearwater .granicus.com /ViewPublisher.php ?view id =11 and click on "Resident Engagement Video." You can also check the informational video out from any Clearwater public library. Ad: 9/4/08 FLD408- 07021: 110 1350 S MICHIGAN AVENUE LAND TR ABRAMS, EDGAR A 13785 WALSINGHAM RD # 126 1312 S MADISON AVE LARGO FL 33774 - 3221 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3526 •ABS FLA INVESTOR LLC 250 E PARK CENTER BLVD BOISE ID 83726 - 0001 ALL LINES INSURANCE GROUP INC ANTHONY, ROBERT ARMITAGE, KIMBERLY 1345 S MISSOURI AVE SIRAGUSA, MEGHAN 110 12TH AVE S CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 6533 1367 MICHIGAN AVE S SAFETY HARBOR FL 34695 - 3829 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3527 AUSTIN, BARRY F BAER, WILLIAM R AUSTIN, CHARLOTTE E BAER, NANCY E 1135 LA KEVIEW BARLOW, FRANK P THE 1389 CHESTERFIELD DR 1380 MICHIGAN AVE CLEARWATER LAKEVIEW FL 3 3 3756 - 3584 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 6324 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 6507 CLE BARLOW, JOHN P BARWIOLEK, JUNE BAUTISTA, PURITA BARLOW, FRANK P KOZIENIAK, JOYCE L 1316 MADISON AVE S 1326 S MADISON AVE 103 EMERALD AVE CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3526 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - IRWIN PA 15642 - 7612 BEDNARSKI, JERRY A BELL, ERNEST EUGENE BLAKE, VALERIE A BEDNARSKI, IRENE 1345 S MADISON AVE 1348 MADISON AVE S 2190 BELCHER RD S STE B CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3525 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 6505 LARGO FL 33771 - 4020 BONFIETTI, EBI P BOSSERMAN, JOSEPH H BROWN, HARRY B JR REV TRUST 1359 S MICHIGAN AVE • BOSSERMAN, DIANA H BROWN, ANN L REV TRUST CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3527 1324 YOUNG AVE 3060 ALT 19 N CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3554 PALM HARBOR FL 34683 - 1929 BROWN, RHEA BURWELL, ROBERT A JR THE CHURCHILL, KEVIN 1235 LAKEVIEW RD 845 BAY ESPLANADE 1368 S MICHIGAN AVE CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3545 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1108 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 6507 COMBS, MARVIN G COMIGHOD, LEOPOLDO G COREY, HAROLD D TRUST COMBS, JUDY K COMIGHOD, VILMA 486 HARBOR DR N 1231 LAKEVIEW RD 1300 MICHIGAN AVE S INDIAN ROCKS BEACH FL 33785 - CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3545 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3528 3115 CROWN LIQUORS BROWARD INC CZAPLINSKY, DONALD C DAILEY, CHRIS 910 NW 10TH PL 1336 YOUNG AVE 1740 EVANS DR FT LAUDERDALE FL 33311 - 61.32 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3554 CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 1908 DAVIDSON, LESLIE F DE LOACH, DENNIS R JR THE DEAN, DUSTIN J DAVIDSON, TERESITA C 8640 SEMINOLE BLVD NORTH -DEAN, PATRICIA M 1370 MADISON AVE S SEMINOLE FL 33772 - 3801 1308 S MADISON AVE CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 6505 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3526 •Dillon Alderman � • DI GIOVANNI, ROBERTO Southeast Principal 1330 YOUNG AVE The Waterfield Design Group, Inc. CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3554 4340 S Manhattan Avenue Tampa, FL 33611 EDWARDS, DAVID J EDWARDS, DARRYL J 1335 S MISSOURI AVE CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3529 GARCIA, MARIA E 1320 S MADISON AVE CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3526 GONZALEZ, PEDRO J PEREZ, JENNIFER 1329 S MADISON AVE CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3525 HARKINS, TAMMY 1620 SANDSTONE CT CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 4529 HILLMON, DEONDREY L HILLMON, CHONICE M 1313 S MADISON AVE CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3525 KAY, KRISTOPHER A 4666 IRIS ST N ST PETERSBURG FL 33714 - 3244 KRUGER, KURT T 1314 YOUNG AVE CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3554 LAMOSTRE, JONATHAN L LAMOSTRE, MARIA ANA L 1308 S MICHIGAN AVE CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3528 FETTERS, JENNIFER 1346 YOUNG AVE CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3554 GILMORE, RANDOLPH D BRABENEC, ELISA 3465 S CENTER HWY SUTTONS BAY MI 49682 - 9252 GONZALEZ- ZAMORA, ALEJANDRO 1378 MICHIGAN AVE CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 6507 HARRISON, GEORGE REALTY CO 1330 S MISSOURI AVE CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3530 HUNSTEIN, DORIS ROSE HUNSTEIN, RALPH J 604 BRANDYWINE DR LARGO FL 33771 - 1854 KEIPER, MICHELLE B 1316 YOUNG AVE CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3554 KUSCHEL, MARK W 1334 YOUNG AVE CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3554 LATELERS, ANNIE G LATELERS, ROBERT 1360 S MADISON AVE CLEARWATER FIL 33756 - 6505 Dr. Kazi Hassan 6333 54th Avenue N St. Petersburg, FL 33709 FREEMAN, COLIN FREEMAN,KATHY 1420 SUNSET POINT RD CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 1536 GOLDEN, NATHANIEL JR GOLDEN, CYNTHIA Y 1385 S MADISON AVE CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 6506 GRONBECK,DONN 112 W GRAPEFRUIT CIR CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 2411 HECKROW, CINDY 603 RUSKIN RD CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 2336 JONES, EDWIN A RIMKUS- JONES, MICHELLE L 1354 S MADISON AVE CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 6505 KING, DAVID O KING, MERRIAN D 1325 S MADISON AVE CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3525 LAMBERT, STEVEN D LAMBERT, DENISE M 1340 YOUNG AVE CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3554 LINCONA, VICTOR 1315 MICHIGAN AVE CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3527 MAC DONALD, MICHAEL L MC CRAY, GLEMMA L F MC DOUGAL, BOOKER T 2342 PEMBROOK DR 1247 NICHOLSON ST MC DOUGAL, ESSIE R CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 6511 CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 4326 1338 S MADISON AVE CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3526 • - ' 0 MC MULLEN, CLAUDE D MC MULLEN, D GUY PROP INC MONGO, DEMARCUS TORIBIO, ERMA J PO BOX 91 1363 S MADISON AVE 1331 S WASHINGTON AVE CLEARWATER FL 33757 - 0091 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 6506 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3535 MR TAX INC NELSON, BILLY J NEW MILLENNIAL LC EILEEN 1311 MISSOURI AVE S NELSON, 7303 N NEBRASKA AVE CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3529 1157 LAKEVIEW RD TAMPA FL 33604 - 4918 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3585 PEMBERTON, MARIA PENA, APOLONIA ' PERR, EVA I 1374 S MICHIGAN AVE 1309 S MICHIGAN AVE 1390 S MICHIGAN AVE CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 6507 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3527 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 6507 PHILLIPS, TERRI PINELLAS BD OF PUB INST PINELLAS FARM BUREAU GONZALEZ, GABRIEL PO BOX 2942 1165 LAKEVIEW RD 1379 S MADISON AVE LARGO FL 33779 - 2942 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3586 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 6506 POLAKOFF, KURT E QAZIMI, PERPARIM RABAII, JAWDETT I PA BARNES, LORITA S QAZIMI, BURBUQE 1358 MISSOURI AVE 1352 S MICHIGAN AVE 87 FRENCH ST CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 6535 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 6507 WATERTOWN CT 06795 - 2923 RALEY, PAUL RAWLS, CALVIN J RICHARD, J SELTZER RALEY, LEE RAWLS, WANDA V RD 1371 MISSOURI AVE S 1830 S LADY MARY DR CLEARWATER LAKEVIEW ARWATER FL 3 3 3756 - 3586 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3529 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 1736 CLE ROGERO, ANN M ROGERS, KELLY RUIZ, MARY EST 1353 S MICHIGAN AVE 1321 S MADISON AVE PO BOX 261041 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3527 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3525 CRP CHRISTI TX 78426 - 1041 SAMARAS, GEORGE SCHLUETER, GREG SEECHARAN, FRANKLYN 1503 PUTNAM CTR 1364 MICHIGAN AVE S 2124 FLAMINGO PL DUNEDIN FL 34698 - 7433 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 6507 SAFETY HARBOR FL 34695 - 4958 SEILBACH, JEFFREY SHAW, MARK G SHUGARS, EVA A GAYLE F 1241 FAIRWAY CIR S SHAW, 1319 MICHIGAN AVE S ST PETERSBURG FL 33705 - 4652 1314 MICHIGAN AVE S CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3527 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3528 SIMPSON, LUCIUS SMITH, DEBORAH SMITH, DOROTHY M 1344 S MICHIGAN AVE SMITH, HEATHER 1153 SOUTH ST CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3528 1231 EASY ST CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3561 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3539 SNOW, SCOTT EST SNOW, GAYLE WORDIE 1804 MAPLELEAF BLVD OLDSMAR FL 34677 - 2732 STRATTON, JAMES W 15 S NEPTUNE AVE CLEARWATER FL 33765 - THOMPSON, ROBERT 1375 S MADISON AVE CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 6506 TUGGLE, BILLY L 1364 S MADISON AVE CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 6505 VASILAROS, JACK 111 BAYSIDE DR CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2502 STEPPUTAT- FLOENER, EVELYN H 1310 YOUNG AVE CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3554 TAYLOR, JOHN S III ATTN: AYER, ORION T. JR PO BOX 16007 ST PETERSBURG FL 33733 - 6007 TOTH, VIRGINIA 1334 S MICHIGAN AVE CLEARWATER FL 33756 - VANDEBURGT, TANYA J VANDEBURGT, PAUL S 3127 SHORELINE DR CLEARWATER FL 33760 - 1737 WASHINGTON- MILLER, PRISCILLA 1337 S MADISON AVE CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3525 WORLD SAVINGS & LOAN ASSN YOUNG, CAROLYN ATTN PROPERTY TAX PROC NC0340 SIERRA, JOEL PO BOX 36246 1327 S MICHIGAN AVE CHARLOTTE NC 28236 - 6246 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3527 0 STOCKMAN, JOHN A 1336 S MICHIGAN AVE CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3528 TEKA, OMAWATTIE 13611 SW LURAY RD FT LAUDERDALE FL 33330 - 3601 TRUST NO 1356 PO BOX 186 LAKE WALES FL 33859 - 0186 VASILAROS, JACK 111 BAYSIDE DR CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2502 WELLS, THEODORE A WELLS, ELLEN 13517 EBELL ST PANORAMA CITY CA 91402 - 5534 Property Appraiser General Information: 22/29/15/48978/005/0170 Card 1 , At , , - int—e rq UiV & Mqp.ANjj q - Comparable giable Sale - s Oaa-to-Qry New Tax Collect_... Pkr ce I Listing Results Search Information Page 1 of 4 QuestjopiLQomment about t ' this pqrcel 22/29/15/48978/005/0170 BuildinglBuildint, 2of 2 Data Current as of July 20, 2008 [9:39 am Thursday July 24] a. Nonresidential Property Owner, Address, and Sales Print Retail Store Property Use: 320 LAKEVIEW HEIGHTS BLK E, LOTS 17 THRU 24 INCL & BLK J, LOT 24 & E 1/2 VAC ALLEY LYING Click here for full legal 2008 Exemptions Homestead: No Use: 0% Ownership: 0% Tax Exempt: 0% Government: No Institutional: No Agricultural: $0 Historic: $0 2007 Value 2007 Tax Information Comparable Sales value based on sales from 2005- Tax District:CW 2006:$0 Millage: 19.9371 F.S. 553.844 Just/Market Value: $1,477,800 Non Ad Valorem Assessments: $.00 Assessed Value/ SOH Cap: $1,477,800 Taxes: $29,463.10 History .. . Taxable Value: $1,477,800 Taxes without Save-Our-Homes cap: $29,463.10 A. significant taxable value increase may occur Taxes without any exemptions: $29,463.10 when sold. Click here . for details. Owner/Mailing Address Property Address Sale Date Book/Page Price Q—/U V/1 HARRISON, GEORGE No Recent Sales REALTY CO 1330 S MISSOURI AVE 1314 S MISSOURI AVE Plat Year Plat Book/Page(s) CLEARWATER FL 33756- 1925 013/ 005 3530 Parcel Information Book/Page: Land Use: Stores (11) 01.640/0535 Census Tract: 258.00 Evacuation Zone: NON- EVAC http: / /www.pcpao.org/general _ nadet.php ?pn= 1529224897800501701 7/24/2008 Property Appraiser General Information: 22/29/15/48978/005 /0170 Card 1 low Land Information Seawall: Frontage: None Land Use Land Size Unit Value Stores 11 250 x 94 12.00 Foundation: Spread/Monolithic Footing Floor System: Slab on Grade Exterior Wall: Concrete Block/Stucco Roof Frame: Bar Joist/Rigid Frame Roof Cover: Built -up Metal/Gypsum Height Factor: 0 Floor Finish: Carpet Combination Interior Finish: Drywall Party wall: None Structural Frame: Masonry Pillar & Steel Cabinet & Mill: Average Quality: Average Heating & Air: Heating & cooling Package Electric: Average Bath Tile: None Fixtures: 5 Total Units: 0 Year Built: 1960 Effective Age: 20 Other Depreciation: 0 Functional Depreciation: 0 Economic Depreciation: 0 Structural Elements Page 2 of 4 View: Units Method 23,500.00 S Open plot in New Window. View Floor: 1 ..... ;Click here if screen is blank http: / /www.pcpao.org/ general_ nadet .php ?pn = 1529224897800501701 7/24/2008 Property Appraiser General Information: 22/29/15/48978/005 /0170 Card 1 Page 3 of 4 Nonresidential. Extra. Features Description Dimensions Value/Unit Units Total NewValue Depreciated Value Year Asphalt 11500 $1.75 11500 $20,130.00 $20,130.00 Unknown http:// www. pcpao.org/general_nadet.php ?pn= 1529224897800501701 7/24/2008 Sub. Area information Description Building Finished Ft2 Gross Area Ft2 Factor Effective Ft2 Base Area 13,845 13,845 1.00 13,845 Utili Room Finished 1,924 .55 1,058 Canopy 1,485 .25 371 Loading Platform 310 .50 155 Total Building Finished SF: 13,845 Total Gross SF:. 17,564 Total Effective SF: 15,429 Nonresidential. Extra. Features Description Dimensions Value/Unit Units Total NewValue Depreciated Value Year Asphalt 11500 $1.75 11500 $20,130.00 $20,130.00 Unknown http:// www. pcpao.org/general_nadet.php ?pn= 1529224897800501701 7/24/2008 Property Appraiser General Information: 22/29/15/48978/005/0170 Card 1 Page 4 of 4 Interactive Map of this Cqmp Sales Back to Qu� New Tax Collector Question; Comment about this parcel Umin.", Results Search Information. paZe http: / /www.pcpao.org/general _ nadet.php ?pn= 1529224897800501701 7/24/2008 It z i Property Appraiser General Information: 22/29/15/48978/005/0170 Card 2 Iwirl d.c t ve MaD o......f .thi. s QQ—rnpa- r- -able Sales 105A k-to-Qugry New T a. . x .. . . C.ol lec parcel.' Listin g Results Search Information Page I of 4 Qpestion/Comment about this . __ ---.- . . ..... . ..... . ..... . parcel <<Building 122/29/15/48978/005/0170 Building 2 Data Current as of July 20, 2008 [9:40 am Thursday July 24] Nonresidential Property Owner, Address, and Sales Print Retail Store Property Use: 320 LAKEVIEW HEIGHTS BLK E, LOTS 17 THRU 24 INCL & BLK J, LOT 24 & E 1/2 VAC ALLEY LYING Click here for full legal 2008 Exemptions Homestead: No Use: 0% Ownership: 0% Tax Exempt: 0% Government: No Institutional: No Agricultural: $0 Historic: $0 2007 Value 2007 Tax Information Comparable Sales value based on sales from 2005- Tax District: CW ..... . . ....... 2006:10 Millage: 19.9371 F.S. 553.844 Just/Market Value: $1,477,800 Non Ad Valorem Assessments: $.00 Assessed Value/ SOH Cap: $1,477,800 Taxes: $29,463.10 History . . Taxable Value: $1,477,800 Taxes without Save-Our-Homes cap: $29,463.10 A significant taxable value increase may occur Taxes without any exemptions: $29,463.10 when sold. Click here, for details. Owner/Mailing Address Property Address Sale Date Book/Page Price Q/U V/1 HARRISON, GEORGE No Recent Sales REALTY CO 1330 S MISSOURI AVE 1314 S MISSOURI AVE Plat Year Plat Book/Page(s) CLEARWATER FL 33756- 1925 013/005 3530 Parcel Information Book/Page: Land Use: Stores (11) 01640/0535 Census Tract: 258.00 Evacuation Zone: NON- EVAC http://www.pcpao.org/general–nadet.php?pn=l 5292248978005017002 7/24/2008 Property Appraiser General Information: 22/29/15/48978/005 /0170 Card 2 Land Information Seawall: Frontage: None Land Use Land Size Unit Value Stores 11 250 x 94 , 12.00 Foundation: Spread/Monolithic Footing Floor System: Slab on Grade Exterior Wall: Concrete Block/Stucco Roof Frame: Bar Joist/Rigid Frame Roof Cover: Built -up Metal/Gypsum Height Factor: 18 Floor Finish: Carpet Combination Interior Finish: Drywall Party wall: None Structural Frame: Masonry Pillar & Steel Cabinet & Mill: Average Quality: Average Heating & Air: Heating & cooling Package Electric: Average Bath Tile: None Fixtures: 0 Total Units: 0 Year Built: 1971 Effective Age: 20 Other Depreciation: 0 Functional Depreciation: 0 Economic Depreciation: 0 Structural Elements Page 2 of 4 View: Units Method 23,500.00 S Open plot in New Window View Floor:. l ;Click here if screen is blank http:// www. pcpao.org/general_nadet.php ?pn= 15292248978005017002 7/24/2008 Property Appraiser General Information: 22/29/15/48978/005 /0170 Card 2 Sub. Area information Description Building Finished Ft2 Gross Area Ft? Base Area 9,555 9,555 Open Porch Finished 805 Total Building Finished SF: 9,555 Total Gross SF: 10,360 Nonresidential Extra Features Description Dimensions Value/Unit Units Total NewValue No Extra Features on Record Page 3 of 4 Factor Effective Ft2 1.00 9,555 .30 242 Total Effective SF: 9,797 Depreciated Value Year http: / /www.pcpao.org/ general_ nadet .php ?pn = 15292248978005017002 7/24/2008 Property Appraiser General Information: 22/29/15/48978/005 /0170 Card 2 Page 4 of 4 Interactive. Map of this Comparable Sales Back to Query New Tax Collector Question / Comment about this p a rcel . Listing Results Search Information pale http: / /www.pcpao.org/general _ nadet.php ?pn= 15292248978005017002 7/24/2008 The Waterfield Design Group, Inc. P.O. Box 55755 Saint Petersburg, Florida 33732 Phone:813- 833 -5161 Fax:813- 315 -6664 Response Letter Date: June 6th, 2010 To: (;o � iew Re: Florida Pain Management Clearwater Office 1330 & 1340 South Missouri Avenue, Clearwater, Florida 33756 Project Number: BCP2009 -07576 Parcel ID Number: 22- 29 -15- 48978 - 005 -0170 The following explain how your initial review plan comments have been addressed: Zoning Review 10/21/09: While sheet S.7 has been indicated on the coversheet (CS) that it is deleted, it is still in the plans and not deleted. 8/12/09: Signage is not reviewed or approved thru the building permit process. Remove all signage from the plans. Please find on sheet CS of the site plans that sheet S.7 has been deleted from the plan set and the sheets have been removed from the plan copies provided. Please note that the two parking areas on our site were reconfigured to accommodate the 50' Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) ingress throat depth requirement. A copy of the FDOT permit is attached with the re- submittal package. The changes have not reduced the required number of parking spaces, the green space area has remained the same and the type and number of plant species identified on the landscaping plan have not changed (only reconfigured). We have also maintained the setback requirements stated in the Flexible Development Order. / If you have any questions please call me at: (813) 833 -5161. Thank you, Dill John Alderman Southeast Principal The Waterfield Design Group, Inc: 110 �L ► � JUN t 7 2010 1330 S MISSOURI AVE 1340 '- BCP2009 -07576 REDEVELOPMENT OF EXIST RETAIL FLORIDA PAIN MANAGEMENT Zoning: C Atlas #: 306A FLJ) aoo8-09-0a1 LEGAL DESCRIPTION _ A PARCEL OF LAND LOCATED IN SECTION 22, TOWNSHIP 29 SOUTH, RANGE 15 EAST, PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA. BLOCK 'E', LOTS 17 THROUGH 24, AND BLOCK 3, LOT 24, AND THE EAST 1/2 OF THE VACATED RIGHT OF WAY OF SOUTH STREET; ALL OF THE PLAT OF "LAKEVIEW HEIGHTS ", AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 13, PAGE 5, IN THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA. ALL OF THE ABOVE LESS THE EAST 10 FEET FOR RIGHT OF WAY FOR SOUTH MISSOURI AVENUE. 1 STY FRAME RES. #1353 GARAGE FF = 65.63 FF = 63.97 >-< x� e Qty, R 02 1 STY MAS RES xs x o #1349 Q FF =64.22 CD n m x lOt # 1 F I R1 /2" NO ID i zv Z 0'o ° e - ¢ O a e a e° a '`tlx ° lot # 23 e ° ° -- / TO-P0 F BANK m a ° I /x_ BOT OF BANK -A, et a d e• ° e d I I p,OjENS\ON PPP I s ° `'aX :'•_ x __�''�� B FIR 1/2 L-4 a PSM 4086 00 • �� a •� p . . �? o :s 550.8' to N. R/W of KINGSLEY ST. M = 65.31 S -E INV = 61 31 VITREOUS CLAY PIPE X es_ I I O ow"B< eA /Xe r, i 11� EL &4AD Si to TBM s 1. TBM #1,'ON THE NORTH RIM OF SAN. M.H., LOCATED 272' SOUTH OF NE PROPERTY CORNER, ELEV = 64.14 NAVD 88. 2. TBM #2, ON NGS MON. "HARRIS AA ", LOCATED 96' NORTH OF NE PROPERTY CORNER, AND 2.8' BEHIND THE CURB. ELEV. = 61.99 NAVD 88. SURVEY NOTES 1. NO VISIBLE CEMETERIES OR BURIAL GROUNDS EXIST. 2. UNDERGROUND ENCROACHMENTS, IF EXISTING, WERE NOT MAPPED. 3. 8'X1 O' METAL SHED ATQENCROACHES WEST PROPERTY LINE BY 1.24' 4. BASIS OF BEARINGS: THE WEST BOUNDARY LINE OF SUBJECT PARCEL AS: N00'00'00 "E. x -ohw -xRr `'a x s xer 6' wood fence X_ x a,� 0 0 0 .e C, lot # 14 CD WOOD SHED � 9'x 10' ALUM SHED 189 ?o e's i7 /ems +s> �5 pin 6' CON�`RETE SID WALK ° ° 110 WIT& 2' SRD CUR 2 STY FR RES. #1341 FF =63.49 2 STY FR RES. #1337 FF = 63.34 ,S'CI�E'I�IILE' '�'; ,S'E'CTION ,2, E'XCE'PTIONS OA 3' EASEMENT AT THE REAR OF ALL LOTS FOR UTILITIES. (PER PLAT) FLOOD ZONE THIS PROPERTY FALLS IN ZONE'X', WHICH IS IN AN AREA THAT HAS BEEN DETERMINED TO BE IN AN AREA OUTSIDE OF THE 500 YEAR FLOODPLAIN. DATA WAS DERIVED BY F.I.R.M. # 12103C 0108 H, IN PINELLAS COUNTY. EFFECTIVE DATE: MAY 1 =', 2005. Ix 0 x xe �x lot # 13 lot # 12 RAIN 2 STY FR RES. #1333 FF = 62.83 I lot # 11 xe ] x \max 5.06 �s e`s _ x ohw - s� \ e Lje 2_ - - - N 0 "00'00 "E 511.80' ( ,Qw) eye 1 & 2 STORY MASONRY COMMERCIAL BUILDING AREA = 25,568 SQ. FT. HEIGHT= 19.5'& 13.0' I 2 STORY HEIGHT = 19.5' 2 STY FR RES. #1329 FF = 62.68 lot # 10 C'ERTITICA TIONS THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THIS MAP OR PLAT ON WHICH IT IS BASED CONFORMS TO THE MINIMUM TECHNICAL STANDARDS OF CHAPTER 61G17 -6, OF THE FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE. ADDITIONS OR DELETIONS TO SURVEY MAPS OR REPORTS BY OTHER THAN THE SIGNING PARTY OR PARTIES IS PROHIBITED WITHOUT THE WRITTEN CONSENT OF THE SIGNING PARTY OR PARTIES. LOU BOUDREAU 715 71 STAVE. ST. PETE BEACH, ,�, /% FLORIDA 33706 %� -, ' DATE: 6/25/08 THE MAP AND COPIES THEREOF ARE NOT VALID WITHOUT THE SIGNATURE AND ORIGINAL RAISED SEAL OF A FLORIDA LICENSED SURVEYOR AND MAPPER. 1 STY FR RES REVISIONS e x a ?pia added FF on Legal Bldg, changed 6 parking spaces to 7 spaces, added curb cut opposite NE corner of building., added utility MH. JL no 30, 2008 1 STY FR RES x e�9ti metal guardrail BFP = BACKFLOW PREVENTER x = FOUND IRON PIPE PERM = PERMANENT CALC = CALCULATED #1319 = FOUND IRON ROD POB _ CICB = CURB INLET CATCH BASIN FF= 62.62 = FOUND POC = FF = FF = 62.07 FF = 61.69 pP = STY FR RES CLRS = CLEARS FPP = FND PINCHED PIPE 0 POWER POLE CON = CONCRETE GVN = GAS VALVE =POWER 0 CD = CONC. LIGHT POLE GM = GAS METER R = RECORDED or RADIUS C/O = SAN. CLEAN -OUT x�CD n v' \c � xea COR Q= = CORNER STORM MANHOLE F F 61.46 = LIGHT POLE SIR = 0 \ x M = MEASURED \ SPIKE CD = EASEMENT � s A / SRD = 116.56\ EB lot #6 MLP = METAL LIGHT POLE 0 = TELEPHONE PEDESTAL �X = FIRE HYDRANT MON = MONUMENT IwN = WATER VALVE FCM = FOUND CONCRETE MON. lot #7 = OVERALL XRR = POWER TRANSFORMER FC FENCE PAV x lot #9 CATCH BASIN 4 \ � o� k AR x 10 "TREE EN ' o p /x,12 , x x e''� x a /a�f 'eAo 29.1 �� J x er \s 8 "TREE 'o '•y 189 ?o e's i7 /ems +s> �5 pin 6' CON�`RETE SID WALK ° ° 110 WIT& 2' SRD CUR 2 STY FR RES. #1341 FF =63.49 2 STY FR RES. #1337 FF = 63.34 ,S'CI�E'I�IILE' '�'; ,S'E'CTION ,2, E'XCE'PTIONS OA 3' EASEMENT AT THE REAR OF ALL LOTS FOR UTILITIES. (PER PLAT) FLOOD ZONE THIS PROPERTY FALLS IN ZONE'X', WHICH IS IN AN AREA THAT HAS BEEN DETERMINED TO BE IN AN AREA OUTSIDE OF THE 500 YEAR FLOODPLAIN. DATA WAS DERIVED BY F.I.R.M. # 12103C 0108 H, IN PINELLAS COUNTY. EFFECTIVE DATE: MAY 1 =', 2005. Ix 0 x xe �x lot # 13 lot # 12 RAIN 2 STY FR RES. #1333 FF = 62.83 I lot # 11 xe ] x \max 5.06 �s e`s _ x ohw - s� \ e Lje 2_ - - - N 0 "00'00 "E 511.80' ( ,Qw) eye 1 & 2 STORY MASONRY COMMERCIAL BUILDING AREA = 25,568 SQ. FT. HEIGHT= 19.5'& 13.0' I 2 STORY HEIGHT = 19.5' 2 STY FR RES. #1329 FF = 62.68 lot # 10 C'ERTITICA TIONS THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THIS MAP OR PLAT ON WHICH IT IS BASED CONFORMS TO THE MINIMUM TECHNICAL STANDARDS OF CHAPTER 61G17 -6, OF THE FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE. ADDITIONS OR DELETIONS TO SURVEY MAPS OR REPORTS BY OTHER THAN THE SIGNING PARTY OR PARTIES IS PROHIBITED WITHOUT THE WRITTEN CONSENT OF THE SIGNING PARTY OR PARTIES. LOU BOUDREAU 715 71 STAVE. ST. PETE BEACH, ,�, /% FLORIDA 33706 %� -, ' DATE: 6/25/08 THE MAP AND COPIES THEREOF ARE NOT VALID WITHOUT THE SIGNATURE AND ORIGINAL RAISED SEAL OF A FLORIDA LICENSED SURVEYOR AND MAPPER. -1 X w FF Elev = 64.3£ 9 ro N N O0 � m 10 I y9< c0 ° .y •. ° n .e n °.• ,rte ° n ��° eir I•? I E \� V d�lr X••c° p e ° ° x 90 , . n p4 X .41 ,° e �O p � FIBER DUCT 3.36 - ►I cP,o - y I {? a QD ® ° 0�' o 4a ' N'F - - - - �x -x� es �� BANK n. r p °•' ' co ° I o D o ,p AZm 9< - - - -- �' co AD-mi > (3) 4" iron pipes - - - - - - - ae '9Sp Inv =63.59 'xv O� TMH 164N4RIM oa, pp S00 °13'18 "E 512.18' (R &S) hq <T �° PP - - - - - (A 8'7. U, ♦ ♦ 'o. N Co 44 •V, �- UA f%1 �r-r UY IK/J� !/1��8�Co Vl (n N.a ll _ ".. n Ul ' '�•l�',�"� A_ -� t- ♦ .,a -. . ••" :4_�( u ALA 1)' -�W ° n. - -W -- ° - -JL.. •.-•� a -- -W�' W. ° ply .. ♦ n ° 'p. •p• ° s. �� °'-- -- -- OI,1W ♦ pp ' 9> R 6�9 DESTINATION .t • �U" sanitar line �o ti c, �2� conc SI ewa ? 2 *� 2< 09T UNKNOWOWN a's y OVERHEAD ? 9r o 2' SRD CUR w `2" water main CANOPY 0 0 OVERHEAD - rz CANOPY GTC RIM .. 64.14 (0o o Q- O N -S INV - 59 82 3X X .-+ / UTILl_ -MH 8" VITREOUS CLAY PIPE RIM ELEV= 64 25 � r �� 10 x mj:5450 _r ��_Z xJU _Ax a X61% s� ?, ,T--y iL � m 100' PUBLIC R /Af; BO' ASPHALT PAVZ7VG This Mac and copies thereof nre not vnlirl withnllt thin cinnntllrP nnrl rnicPri cPnl of n Florida licensed Surveyor /Mapper. Additions or deletions to survey maps or reports by other than the signing party is prohibited without written consent of the signing party or parties. 1 STY FR RES REVISIONS D.ATE.- 1 STY FR RES added FF on Legal Bldg, changed 6 parking spaces to 7 spaces, added curb cut opposite NE corner of building., added utility MH. JL no 30, 2008 1 STY FR RES 01 BFP = BACKFLOW PREVENTER #1327 = FOUND IRON PIPE PERM = PERMANENT CALC = CALCULATED #1319 = FOUND IRON ROD POB _ CICB = CURB INLET CATCH BASIN FF= 62.62 = FOUND POC = FF = FF = 62.07 FF = 61.69 pP = STY FR RES CLRS = CLEARS FPP = FND PINCHED PIPE = POWER POLE CON = CONCRETE GVN = GAS VALVE =POWER 15 = CONC. LIGHT POLE GM = GAS METER R = RECORDED or RADIUS C/O = SAN. CLEAN -OUT ® = GRATE INLET Q = SANITARY SEWER COR Q= = CORNER STORM MANHOLE F F 61.46 = LIGHT POLE SIR = SET IRON ROD M = MEASURED lot #8 SPIKE ESMT = EASEMENT MEAS = MEASURED SRD = STATE ROAD DEPARTMENT EB lot #6 MLP = METAL LIGHT POLE 0 = TELEPHONE PEDESTAL �X = FIRE HYDRANT MON = MONUMENT IwN = WATER VALVE FCM = FOUND CONCRETE MON. lot #7 = OVERALL XRR = POWER TRANSFORMER FC FENCE PAV x lot #9 CATCH BASIN % x 10 "TREE 8 "TREE 'o '•y 6,e x a'.0 x ego 0 e 0,0 x e, x U _ ei9 TA L S LL e B..T�E is 0 'o 2 :/ SHS *xSHOWEIR [ _ AK 4(� 1 bfdg . 1 / x x - OOM F S N STALL = 6 4.67 \�\ / _fence AD / 6p. x W EN E s = AfhY ID q;1" \ x \ \ I 1 1 STORY HEIGHT= 13.0' I FF Elev = 64.47 - 6rw 7 t 61.99 asphalt aA g 63.24 top of wall xQ � lot # 16 x CO _ wooden X loa di ng e CON STEPS dock Z -1 X w FF Elev = 64.3£ 9 ro N N O0 � m 10 I y9< c0 ° .y •. ° n .e n °.• ,rte ° n ��° eir I•? I E \� V d�lr X••c° p e ° ° x 90 , . n p4 X .41 ,° e �O p � FIBER DUCT 3.36 - ►I cP,o - y I {? a QD ® ° 0�' o 4a ' N'F - - - - �x -x� es �� BANK n. r p °•' ' co ° I o D o ,p AZm 9< - - - -- �' co AD-mi > (3) 4" iron pipes - - - - - - - ae '9Sp Inv =63.59 'xv O� TMH 164N4RIM oa, pp S00 °13'18 "E 512.18' (R &S) hq <T �° PP - - - - - (A 8'7. U, ♦ ♦ 'o. N Co 44 •V, �- UA f%1 �r-r UY IK/J� !/1��8�Co Vl (n N.a ll _ ".. n Ul ' '�•l�',�"� A_ -� t- ♦ .,a -. . ••" :4_�( u ALA 1)' -�W ° n. - -W -- ° - -JL.. •.-•� a -- -W�' W. ° ply .. ♦ n ° 'p. •p• ° s. �� °'-- -- -- OI,1W ♦ pp ' 9> R 6�9 DESTINATION .t • �U" sanitar line �o ti c, �2� conc SI ewa ? 2 *� 2< 09T UNKNOWOWN a's y OVERHEAD ? 9r o 2' SRD CUR w `2" water main CANOPY 0 0 OVERHEAD - rz CANOPY GTC RIM .. 64.14 (0o o Q- O N -S INV - 59 82 3X X .-+ / UTILl_ -MH 8" VITREOUS CLAY PIPE RIM ELEV= 64 25 � r �� 10 x mj:5450 _r ��_Z xJU _Ax a X61% s� ?, ,T--y iL � m 100' PUBLIC R /Af; BO' ASPHALT PAVZ7VG This Mac and copies thereof nre not vnlirl withnllt thin cinnntllrP nnrl rnicPri cPnl of n Florida licensed Surveyor /Mapper. Additions or deletions to survey maps or reports by other than the signing party is prohibited without written consent of the signing party or parties. NO: REVISIONS D.ATE.- 1 added FF on Legal Bldg, changed 6 parking spaces to 7 spaces, added curb cut opposite NE corner of building., added utility MH. JL no 30, 2008 01 BFP = BACKFLOW PREVENTER FIP = FOUND IRON PIPE PERM = PERMANENT CALC = CALCULATED FIR = FOUND IRON ROD POB _ Dc / o'Z0 a'(0 �/ II �/W Cf)/LL r i RAN t o A "6 ASPHALT I RIM = 6213 N -S INV = 5833 EINV= 5973 8" VITREOUS CLAY PIPE TBM 2 ON N MON "HARRIS AA ". ELEV = 61 99 NAVD 88. xssso xOso, TO) OG)IM)DHIC SURI/EY OF.- PARCEL L OCA TED A T.• 1 314 S. AIISS'O URI A VENUE CLEARWA TER, FLORIDA 33756 FLD BK: #600/16 -23 DATE OF FIELD SURVEY:June 26, 2008 SHEET 1 OF 1 IA E tD 0 01 cis 0 iv a 0 0 cis 0 0- a) co U n n 7 0 LEGEND / ABBREVIATIONS E7 = AIR CONDITIONING UNIT 01 BFP = BACKFLOW PREVENTER FIP = FOUND IRON PIPE PERM = PERMANENT CALC = CALCULATED FIR = FOUND IRON ROD POB _ CICB = CURB INLET CATCH BASIN FND = FOUND POC = POINT OF COMMENCEMENT pP = POWER POLE CLRS = CLEARS FPP = FND PINCHED PIPE = POWER POLE CON = CONCRETE GVN = GAS VALVE =POWER POLE &LIGHT = CONC. LIGHT POLE GM = GAS METER R = RECORDED or RADIUS C/O = SAN. CLEAN -OUT ® = GRATE INLET Q = SANITARY SEWER COR Q= = CORNER STORM MANHOLE # = LIGHT POLE SIR = SET IRON ROD M = MEASURED SPK = SPIKE ESMT = EASEMENT MEAS = MEASURED SRD = STATE ROAD DEPARTMENT EB = ELECTRIC PANEL /BOX MLP = METAL LIGHT POLE 0 = TELEPHONE PEDESTAL �X = FIRE HYDRANT MON = MONUMENT IwN = WATER VALVE FCM = FOUND CONCRETE MON. 0/A = OVERALL XRR = POWER TRANSFORMER FC FENCE PAV = PAVING CB = CATCH BASIN Dc / o'Z0 a'(0 �/ II �/W Cf)/LL r i RAN t o A "6 ASPHALT I RIM = 6213 N -S INV = 5833 EINV= 5973 8" VITREOUS CLAY PIPE TBM 2 ON N MON "HARRIS AA ". ELEV = 61 99 NAVD 88. xssso xOso, TO) OG)IM)DHIC SURI/EY OF.- PARCEL L OCA TED A T.• 1 314 S. AIISS'O URI A VENUE CLEARWA TER, FLORIDA 33756 FLD BK: #600/16 -23 DATE OF FIELD SURVEY:June 26, 2008 SHEET 1 OF 1 IA E tD 0 01 cis 0 iv a 0 0 cis 0 0- a) co U n n 7 0 / 01 x xis Dc / o'Z0 a'(0 �/ II �/W Cf)/LL r i RAN t o A "6 ASPHALT I RIM = 6213 N -S INV = 5833 EINV= 5973 8" VITREOUS CLAY PIPE TBM 2 ON N MON "HARRIS AA ". ELEV = 61 99 NAVD 88. xssso xOso, TO) OG)IM)DHIC SURI/EY OF.- PARCEL L OCA TED A T.• 1 314 S. AIISS'O URI A VENUE CLEARWA TER, FLORIDA 33756 FLD BK: #600/16 -23 DATE OF FIELD SURVEY:June 26, 2008 SHEET 1 OF 1 IA E tD 0 01 cis 0 iv a 0 0 cis 0 0- a) co U n n 7 N F= x 1 STY FRAME R #1353 /// /PF =i iRR xI x / 2 STY FR RES.' #1341' FF =63.49 2 STY FR #1337 FF = 63.3• #9333 FF = 62.83 / xv. € 1 STY MAS RES I F x x x 1 x r_ x/; ° X I ° #1349 / �/ z 0): {'k a FF = 84.22 Oil I x N xf,3 ,rf Q .':... '4. s• yi.' ^ i,'3's / `� . •4,i:. f, >= CD m \\ RAIN I REMOVE METAL 9' x 10'ALUM SHED FF =63. Ja �� >:':`:•.:... x xj� \\\� x x t +s, } GUARDRAIL J A O //' I1 \ \�\ 5.06 q3 ,. x` 6' wood fence x - -` 3 ° 1 ABEL J,1j}�x —? — ohw — F IF— N60 00 00 E 511.80 (R &M) , r > >. r h ', tr metal •J:• FIR1 /2" ' x' guardrail y, NO ID x N, x °�.. f• / "t. i' x 2 STY FR ES./ #1329 / FF =62.68 WINE IMFIA '104 NINE v ♦ LA ♦ IINVAIS nn 1 & 2 STORY MASONRY COMMERCIAL BUILDING REMOVE CONCRETE °' AREA = 25,568�SQ. FT. IN ISLAND HEIGHT= 19.5 & 13.0 PORTION OF 61.99 asphalt _ O x BUILDING TO BE y4/ v , 63.40 top of wall x �u I DEMOLISHED x j ° a '' REMOVE PAVEME N,p w rn r;•. 4c..... : :: ::i:::: ...........:::::::: :::;:::` d —c °� . ° - 0) i g ..............: x 1 � I r &CURBING S� o n C) o 0 �, � r; N ° °° ° m rn REMOVE CONCRETE, ° :,° :� •' Xr �' X'!�, CURB & ASPHALT II j ° v a a•' a �j 0 xu. REMOVE I iii R o CID PLANTER ;� .�........ �' 2 STORY HEIGHT = 19.5' ' 1 .56 REMOVE °O °' " xs FF Elev = 64.39 Z/, • L ;;,i ! ?•; REMOVE OVER- PLANTER REMOVE OVER- 4 p co �?G� REMOVE ASPHAL Y REMOVE CURB 10 HEAD CANOPY HEAD CANOPY .y Q/� V O M ° , °. Q��• ° '° x� TOPOFB ryli HAND WITHIN &ASPHALT PROTECTIVE RADIUS 1 1J a ' OF TREE y 1 / fi,, x x� x' EN Xir. x ��i' ° .G% • o o /� . o c o .° p f7 . IB W ..° • n s I 'f3 �y7 .9� 'O /d ��iJ �s °o n a n ':f :A ' /G' IC 3 M -r- 4 I \O Pg� /; ! 7 ..3, f fy i ° n x U ` , •.1i o ....k.......... I L:% -Oy fl . /� e� . ° .. •'g;, ' I I ��•Cfc x2. � • :li /• ° 1. X s t K C_ '4s . t............af% i :1B "BABEL fr n O !tx i.. ... �F ♦ i�' E AR �Y/ 'i •sy . / . ...................................... A/ G <i ae .�4, o r n r x ; _ SM 4086 e%u a�fe t - 4 p 4 {R UJ Co RNV .,.,.. .....'.,;;....... ......................... .. ... ....:.......... ..........is�:....... ' .• a - '° - - '• s •'L.: , .,r - In N r —:A, �' • n eq _%5�.'.fn f%y •' > 'r•.•f n „Jd" '•—'' ' ° v .. • • A P d.. fA �a .. i r r .... • n —' s --ohw ` z r f,F= - e^-�9 -'' :T. 'a -•vim .n, a �•i: '�.s- p- -- -� OIIW- --s-- -a- 7� f o p 'YS- �IF- n4- --W�/r -- f, as '�11/, •^'':: . °�' c . �� p. 6 CON &BETE SID WALK ° ' ' M / T!ter >. y ' Cork Sl ewa :l5 ..9 O :o r 7.? i O UNKNOWO ita Iln .-« '• 7(D ' // REMOVE fip i/ �® DESTINATIO ry ls' 9 '•% �•f' T OVERHE 2 SRD CUR r AD c 2' D CUR �' REMOVE OVER- main ASPHALT & CANOPY � o 0 SAW CUT EDGES OF OVERHEAD CONCRETE ='o^ 0- � //.......: >.iv.c.:,i .' I :ii /iyi' ''si, s '! •'. '........ , ' ASPHALT & ASPHALT '1 REMOVE CURB HEAD CANOPY CONCRETE SAW CUT EDGES OF PAVEMENT PRIOR TO RIM cno 0 rL S- o & ASPHALT PAVEMENT PRIOR TO D B CANOPY x =-x x REMOVAL OF REMOVAL OF m a ^VITREOUS CLAY PIPE / MATERIALS TYP) SAW CUT EDGES OF 7, � MATERIALS (TYP) ( ' PAVEMENT PRIOR TO REMOVAL OF oC` MATERIALS (TYP) & 0�' X^ X M x x„ xfi' /T �/T / /7� \ \ \ \ \ \/T /T �x /7�, ' n W xf�% x •�•/ �s ��® �/ j Y' 1 V �LJ �LJ y�'s• x x Z t O � ..................... .. - ---------- ....... - - - -. - 1 LD ............................................. ............................... � C � O > .100 ' PUBLIC R /R; BO' ASPHALT PA VING � .N � 1 STl( FR REST .� U) - 1 STY FR REST 1 STY FR RES =o� O 2 w 1 #133 / Q 1 FF 2.62/ 0 FF ?62.07 d z FF 61.69 STY FR RES W o p � o EL V/ 5// U I i m i FF 61.46 C) X s f� 's 010 x 10 "TREE 8 "jREE x {�fi ` r•f3 a S O �, ^Y r ,s a i uu xis a of DEMOLIS x xu/ 6 T6 u U LL LL x� THIS PORTI CID oZ ; 8 "TJtE C7 - e LL am Z �� 4�'o rn s W D SHE 3. S I AK bfdl x u—''- x� o w TAL-- OOM 9 z s D N / / i x� SHOWER STALL e 6� j r u' - WINE IMFIA '104 NINE v ♦ LA ♦ IINVAIS nn 1 & 2 STORY MASONRY COMMERCIAL BUILDING REMOVE CONCRETE °' AREA = 25,568�SQ. FT. IN ISLAND HEIGHT= 19.5 & 13.0 PORTION OF 61.99 asphalt _ O x BUILDING TO BE y4/ v , 63.40 top of wall x �u I DEMOLISHED x j ° a '' REMOVE PAVEME N,p w rn r;•. 4c..... : :: ::i:::: ...........:::::::: :::;:::` d —c °� . ° - 0) i g ..............: x 1 � I r &CURBING S� o n C) o 0 �, � r; N ° °° ° m rn REMOVE CONCRETE, ° :,° :� •' Xr �' X'!�, CURB & ASPHALT II j ° v a a•' a �j 0 xu. REMOVE I iii R o CID PLANTER ;� .�........ �' 2 STORY HEIGHT = 19.5' ' 1 .56 REMOVE °O °' " xs FF Elev = 64.39 Z/, • L ;;,i ! ?•; REMOVE OVER- PLANTER REMOVE OVER- 4 p co �?G� REMOVE ASPHAL Y REMOVE CURB 10 HEAD CANOPY HEAD CANOPY .y Q/� V O M ° , °. Q��• ° '° x� TOPOFB ryli HAND WITHIN &ASPHALT PROTECTIVE RADIUS 1 1J a ' OF TREE y 1 / fi,, x x� x' EN Xir. x ��i' ° .G% • o o /� . o c o .° p f7 . IB W ..° • n s I 'f3 �y7 .9� 'O /d ��iJ �s °o n a n ':f :A ' /G' IC 3 M -r- 4 I \O Pg� /; ! 7 ..3, f fy i ° n x U ` , •.1i o ....k.......... I L:% -Oy fl . /� e� . ° .. •'g;, ' I I ��•Cfc x2. � • :li /• ° 1. X s t K C_ '4s . t............af% i :1B "BABEL fr n O !tx i.. ... �F ♦ i�' E AR �Y/ 'i •sy . / . ...................................... A/ G <i ae .�4, o r n r x ; _ SM 4086 e%u a�fe t - 4 p 4 {R UJ Co RNV .,.,.. .....'.,;;....... ......................... .. ... ....:.......... ..........is�:....... ' .• a - '° - - '• s •'L.: , .,r - In N r —:A, �' • n eq _%5�.'.fn f%y •' > 'r•.•f n „Jd" '•—'' ' ° v .. • • A P d.. fA �a .. i r r .... • n —' s --ohw ` z r f,F= - e^-�9 -'' :T. 'a -•vim .n, a �•i: '�.s- p- -- -� OIIW- --s-- -a- 7� f o p 'YS- �IF- n4- --W�/r -- f, as '�11/, •^'':: . °�' c . �� p. 6 CON &BETE SID WALK ° ' ' M / T!ter >. y ' Cork Sl ewa :l5 ..9 O :o r 7.? i O UNKNOWO ita Iln .-« '• 7(D ' // REMOVE fip i/ �® DESTINATIO ry ls' 9 '•% �•f' T OVERHE 2 SRD CUR r AD c 2' D CUR �' REMOVE OVER- main ASPHALT & CANOPY � o 0 SAW CUT EDGES OF OVERHEAD CONCRETE ='o^ 0- � //.......: >.iv.c.:,i .' I :ii /iyi' ''si, s '! •'. '........ , ' ASPHALT & ASPHALT '1 REMOVE CURB HEAD CANOPY CONCRETE SAW CUT EDGES OF PAVEMENT PRIOR TO RIM cno 0 rL S- o & ASPHALT PAVEMENT PRIOR TO D B CANOPY x =-x x REMOVAL OF REMOVAL OF m a ^VITREOUS CLAY PIPE / MATERIALS TYP) SAW CUT EDGES OF 7, � MATERIALS (TYP) ( ' PAVEMENT PRIOR TO REMOVAL OF oC` MATERIALS (TYP) & 0�' X^ X M x x„ xfi' /T �/T / /7� \ \ \ \ \ \/T /T �x /7�, ' n W xf�% x •�•/ �s ��® �/ j Y' 1 V �LJ �LJ y�'s• x x Z t O � ..................... .. - ---------- ....... - - - -. - 1 LD ............................................. ............................... � C � O > .100 ' PUBLIC R /R; BO' ASPHALT PA VING � .N � Legend STRUCTURES AND IMPROVEMENTS TO BE REMOVED SHOWN THUS: C6 .� U) - N =o� O ix w Idi Q 2j I 0 _j d z -0 W o p � o EL V/ U W m ry D C) 010 Z a Z EL W oZ ; C7 o a.-o am Z �� 4�'o rn Legend STRUCTURES AND IMPROVEMENTS TO BE REMOVED SHOWN THUS: N =o� Idi Q 2j I 0 _j d z W ofo p � o EL W m i > 4 / .1 r• I STY f #1353/ GARAGE FF = FF = 63.97 r 0ED6' M WALL T IL 'B' FOR SPEC IONS • W-M-01 • #1349 / ,FIF = 64.22 i ohw - wood fence N -- 72100 115. 155 SF rn � o n Landscaping # Buffer ° 9'x 1(0' ALUM SHED 0 {{ N SF Buffer 232 SF--".': 76 SF ' ,/t c ...:.. RU 5 %• 5 CO LO FF = 62.68 / Prop. Outfall 1.) WALLS Control Structure GENERAL NOTES ON SEE SHEETS S.4 & GENERAL NOTES ON S.5 FOR STY FR RES. 1345 SPECIFICATIONS 2 STY FR RES. /FF =63.49/ W z W 2 STY FR RES. /FF 363.34/ Grade 60. Vertical reinforcement shall be placed in the center of the 2 STY FR RES. 36283 = °a _ = 63.75 2. If a slab dowel does not line -up with a vertical core, it shall not be sloped SINGLE ENCLOSURE X <> CD o_. 3. Horizontal wall reinforcement shall be standard truss type DUR -O -WALL (or �FF o ...:.. RU 5 %• 5 CO LO FF = 62.68 / 1: #1 1 ST #132 8Z FF = i " REE r s U U_ TREE ao2r S "• RU �-�.,, " • • •'mil MANDATE 1 STY FR #1319 / 'FF = 61.6! Y FR 5 61.4( �� II y� /�iFi.s':'':: S? %� ' S N , :.;y :i _B: RE AK lot: 7 :. 15 "GOL 3 lic Utility PROPOSED 6' WOOD 1 WD o Catch Bas' /18•X14' asement ? P• /WOOOSHeo PRIVACY FENCE r7 i SHF S ; ' E SHEETS SEE DETAIL 'A' FOR _ OOM £ S.5 FOR z A t T Publi Utility Easement SPECIFICATIONS I U TU ; FF =X1,9 S SPECIFICATI g}jyA t SHOWER ALLj1 \� T"ll Exs 6 wood fence IN N00 °00'00 "E' '511.80' (R& d t ' II w� ........... .......... .......... ........ • .. .... .. ................. .... ................. -- ......................... ..,.......... Landsca IFl $offer 1227 S•F ..,,.,,.,........,.,.. .,,,..,........ ............1,,,� ,.,. .;. .,.,. .. P 9 x•.... ifiscaping Buffer ..... .. ....,....... 246.95' `N`• U 1806 SF . N 150.36 Prop. Stormwater Retentl and � •. iED TOE OF SLOPE 1 FOOTPRINT OF ' OPOSED EXISTING BUILDING TO BE WOOD GATE ayi U 6" CONIC. CURB a N 20' M.B.S.L. DEMOLISED 20' M.B.S.L. Int i/o ° 12 Drive Aisle ° 8 9'x18' Spaces PROPOSED 145 SF v� PROPOSED POND WALL /:. Interior () P EXISTING 1 STORY MASONRY COMMERCIAL BUILDING & RAILING SEE Lan c i A ,, 3 s ;;- : s,. . r• 10' Landsca in Interior WOOD GATE 37.73 ro 3 5 's3£iii.:. /• r;: :/: } p g AREA = 16,374 SQ. FT. to ' r n c in rp a ,� M : SECTION DETAIL 'C' rt' L ndsca ing N 24 Drive Aisle Landscaping HEIGHT = 19.5' & 13.0' DRAINPIPE TO a� sp rn ': ° - (n (Z) Buffer 41st• 1 a Pro 5' Conc. SEE NOTE 4 IN THE CURB INLET �� ehjehd /r� FOR SPECIFICATIONS O o A' .Q _ m AdV�~•S.p/j O i 70 SF CD HEIGHT = 19.5' GENERAL NOTES ON 0 a - •.......v N 00 Milk d P 4 a ' I �, fie:. O /t o Sidewalk I ° a >, a °� a i cc -i � 0 6.00 SHEET S.2 w ° to a v N W N r v1 c 0 24.00 18.00 24.00 18.00 HEIGHT = 13.0' / j ¢ x L c� o? N e° :• a 'If" ~ m a PROP. WHEEL I Accessible = U cc C m 6 S °0 rn -°r° 0 0 c II ° a .: • . a 'I •' w STOP (TYP) Ent / v - p X CV 'e °• ° A•' ,. (n Q N YC / SEE 'TYPICAL DOUBLE HANDICAP ° �N a I Q P .�. "' LO ° M 171 sF > a, o \]- N VJ u, 18.00 24.00 18.0 w (� 60 > c� L Landsc In I �. co ° STALL' ON SHEET S.8 FOR STRIPING ° Q O aa:. .e•. X p Q• ..• / // AND SIGNAGE SPECIFICATIONS °o N X ° ONo Z,�.,� M d acs: tir• w N c e 1b °' ° � 1� (Y� e• a• �2G r••�. � N 16.69 6" CONIC. CURB Xlt Y y v � CO a'� 'V^ o 18.00 ao 24.00 18.00 w 1I vJ Cn J °: �¢��, O b) ACCESSIBLE RAMP Landscaping Landscaping ° Accessible - A Cr) �' d Interior P 9 �I p _ �•• _ �` . °. Q° Fa 2 m Po 41 SF Oiw e • G �• :Ad • an Sca in " S 477 SF 282 SF •, - '° ° Ent o °• �'� S 1 49.49 14. GO P g 25'M .B.S.L. Aat'cgSA� ° '�a 44.8' / v'- 95.12' u� v A.!'sg ph ° t 4 . VV aN: °; Pro .5 ConcSidewalk CoveredE�' ° o ° -° c 4t 1 e:• ° ' , 7.32 �` A a : ° 677 SF -1� -� ° o .. .. ..... .... ....- . -- Ot�: co 4-a 1 @ /t .� '::1 .. ....... ' :. N ' °n �f• ° . .. .. ... ........... ............................... .... .. .U... / :.� �: O, ��..i d: , -a ?t ht 15 Landscaping p. . :..•. -" ' 15' Landsca in - 15 Landscaping Landscaping :.I o ° 9 :. K� 4 _ o a . :. Buffer �_ :. .:I ` o o ° Buffer P o 15 L dscaping o ON Buffer O0 9 e' ° A E - 459 SF : 0 2119 SF 1988 SF ° o Buffer ° 830 SF 24.95 354 S . TAW .. :: i. ° :. °° 14.00 ° 3.50 ° ::394 SF' 14.00 PP ... :. :. ° 14.00 : :::::...... ............................... ° S00 1318E 512.18 R &S) FH :.:.::.._ .:: ......... s o 291 SF ......••••• ••• PP a ......., b ..... ♦ H ';in,' /:T ..jam,. N 4 co ° ° .e- Ce iii- -- • °.__ ° ° N. �� Oh t° • -� d: o to °�Oh cn -p yr �_ w e yV�_ a -° 'µ I16 -w- o n . w. ° . o ° - ,eI o - e o o ° a a ..� . 9 ° ---C- 'A 1.. 7 � e .............. s 2' Conc • o., . Conc s�ewa ° ' e •• ExsT c Rscu x ur EXST. CURB - •••..... , EXST.CURBCUT Conc. sanitary line 2' Conc. Curb DRAINPIPE FROM V r EXST. BCUT •• ••• ... . rY "• •• PROPOSED FIRE 15' Landscaping C b ° e® E t. SIGHT VISIBILITY Landscaping !SIGHT VISIBILITY •• .... Sidewalk 55 OUTFACE CONTROL HYDRANT D SEE NOTE #4 IN THE .O in WATER METER 2 water main Buffer ti TRIANGLE Buffer TRIANGLE UTILITY BOX STRUCTURE GENERAL NOTES ON EXISTING CURB UT 0 .. . 2 SEE NOTE #4 IN THE •• �•••� CURB INLET CATCH BASIN: •• .. SHEET S. s-- o ' GENERAL NOTES ON EXISTING CURB CUT PROPOSED FIRE CURB INLET CATCH BASIN: EXISTING CURB CUT THROAT ELEV, = 62.52 CURB CUT EX STIN U EXISTING C � •• ' ••� "� I G CURB C== SHEET S.2 HYDRANT *SOUTH: 18" RCP, INV. ELEV. = 58.5 BILIT BILIT SIGHT VISIBILITY SIGHT VISIBILITY • ' � ••••�- .. THROAT ELEV. = 63.76 "'•••••. , � F�da, TRIANGLE TRIANGLE *NORTH: 18" RCP, INV. ELEV. = 59.0 *NORTH: 124" RCP, I INV. ELEV. =58.0 UNKNOWN TRIANGLE I Y p TRIANGLE * *EAST: 5" RCP, NV ELEV. = SEE NOTE #4 IN THE SEE NOTE #4 IN THE * *EAST: 18" RCP, INV. ELEV. = UNKNOWN • "" "' • ••-•• .... ••. SEE NOTE #4 IN THE SEE NOTE 4 IN THE SEE DUMPSTER GENERAL NOTES ON GENERAL OTES ON Prop. Outfall 1.) WALLS Control Structure GENERAL NOTES ON SEE SHEETS S.4 & GENERAL NOTES ON S.5 FOR !;iii's ^:':,: - li;s ?•: SPECIFICATIONS RtJ 1: #1 1 ST #132 8Z FF = i " REE r s U U_ TREE ao2r S "• RU �-�.,, " • • •'mil MANDATE 1 STY FR #1319 / 'FF = 61.6! Y FR 5 61.4( �� II y� /�iFi.s':'':: S? %� ' S N , :.;y :i _B: RE AK lot: 7 :. 15 "GOL 3 lic Utility PROPOSED 6' WOOD 1 WD o Catch Bas' /18•X14' asement ? P• /WOOOSHeo PRIVACY FENCE r7 i SHF S ; ' E SHEETS SEE DETAIL 'A' FOR _ OOM £ S.5 FOR z A t T Publi Utility Easement SPECIFICATIONS I U TU ; FF =X1,9 S SPECIFICATI g}jyA t SHOWER ALLj1 \� T"ll Exs 6 wood fence IN N00 °00'00 "E' '511.80' (R& d t ' II w� ........... .......... .......... ........ • .. .... .. ................. .... ................. -- ......................... ..,.......... Landsca IFl $offer 1227 S•F ..,,.,,.,........,.,.. .,,,..,........ ............1,,,� ,.,. .;. .,.,. .. P 9 x•.... ifiscaping Buffer ..... .. ....,....... 246.95' `N`• U 1806 SF . N 150.36 Prop. Stormwater Retentl and � •. iED TOE OF SLOPE 1 FOOTPRINT OF ' OPOSED EXISTING BUILDING TO BE WOOD GATE ayi U 6" CONIC. CURB a N 20' M.B.S.L. DEMOLISED 20' M.B.S.L. Int i/o ° 12 Drive Aisle ° 8 9'x18' Spaces PROPOSED 145 SF v� PROPOSED POND WALL /:. Interior () P EXISTING 1 STORY MASONRY COMMERCIAL BUILDING & RAILING SEE Lan c i A ,, 3 s ;;- : s,. . r• 10' Landsca in Interior WOOD GATE 37.73 ro 3 5 's3£iii.:. /• r;: :/: } p g AREA = 16,374 SQ. FT. to ' r n c in rp a ,� M : SECTION DETAIL 'C' rt' L ndsca ing N 24 Drive Aisle Landscaping HEIGHT = 19.5' & 13.0' DRAINPIPE TO a� sp rn ': ° - (n (Z) Buffer 41st• 1 a Pro 5' Conc. SEE NOTE 4 IN THE CURB INLET �� ehjehd /r� FOR SPECIFICATIONS O o A' .Q _ m AdV�~•S.p/j O i 70 SF CD HEIGHT = 19.5' GENERAL NOTES ON 0 a - •.......v N 00 Milk d P 4 a ' I �, fie:. O /t o Sidewalk I ° a >, a °� a i cc -i � 0 6.00 SHEET S.2 w ° to a v N W N r v1 c 0 24.00 18.00 24.00 18.00 HEIGHT = 13.0' / j ¢ x L c� o? N e° :• a 'If" ~ m a PROP. WHEEL I Accessible = U cc C m 6 S °0 rn -°r° 0 0 c II ° a .: • . a 'I •' w STOP (TYP) Ent / v - p X CV 'e °• ° A•' ,. (n Q N YC / SEE 'TYPICAL DOUBLE HANDICAP ° �N a I Q P .�. "' LO ° M 171 sF > a, o \]- N VJ u, 18.00 24.00 18.0 w (� 60 > c� L Landsc In I �. co ° STALL' ON SHEET S.8 FOR STRIPING ° Q O aa:. .e•. X p Q• ..• / // AND SIGNAGE SPECIFICATIONS °o N X ° ONo Z,�.,� M d acs: tir• w N c e 1b °' ° � 1� (Y� e• a• �2G r••�. � N 16.69 6" CONIC. CURB Xlt Y y v � CO a'� 'V^ o 18.00 ao 24.00 18.00 w 1I vJ Cn J °: �¢��, O b) ACCESSIBLE RAMP Landscaping Landscaping ° Accessible - A Cr) �' d Interior P 9 �I p _ �•• _ �` . °. Q° Fa 2 m Po 41 SF Oiw e • G �• :Ad • an Sca in " S 477 SF 282 SF •, - '° ° Ent o °• �'� S 1 49.49 14. GO P g 25'M .B.S.L. Aat'cgSA� ° '�a 44.8' / v'- 95.12' u� v A.!'sg ph ° t 4 . VV aN: °; Pro .5 ConcSidewalk CoveredE�' ° o ° -° c 4t 1 e:• ° ' , 7.32 �` A a : ° 677 SF -1� -� ° o .. .. ..... .... ....- . -- Ot�: co 4-a 1 @ /t .� '::1 .. ....... ' :. N ' °n �f• ° . .. .. ... ........... ............................... .... .. .U... / :.� �: O, ��..i d: , -a ?t ht 15 Landscaping p. . :..•. -" ' 15' Landsca in - 15 Landscaping Landscaping :.I o ° 9 :. K� 4 _ o a . :. Buffer �_ :. .:I ` o o ° Buffer P o 15 L dscaping o ON Buffer O0 9 e' ° A E - 459 SF : 0 2119 SF 1988 SF ° o Buffer ° 830 SF 24.95 354 S . TAW .. :: i. ° :. °° 14.00 ° 3.50 ° ::394 SF' 14.00 PP ... :. :. ° 14.00 : :::::...... ............................... ° S00 1318E 512.18 R &S) FH :.:.::.._ .:: ......... s o 291 SF ......••••• ••• PP a ......., b ..... ♦ H ';in,' /:T ..jam,. N 4 co ° ° .e- Ce iii- -- • °.__ ° ° N. �� Oh t° • -� d: o to °�Oh cn -p yr �_ w e yV�_ a -° 'µ I16 -w- o n . w. ° . o ° - ,eI o - e o o ° a a ..� . 9 ° ---C- 'A 1.. 7 � e .............. s 2' Conc • o., . Conc s�ewa ° ' e •• ExsT c Rscu x ur EXST. CURB - •••..... , EXST.CURBCUT Conc. sanitary line 2' Conc. Curb DRAINPIPE FROM V r EXST. BCUT •• ••• ... . rY "• •• PROPOSED FIRE 15' Landscaping C b ° e® E t. SIGHT VISIBILITY Landscaping !SIGHT VISIBILITY •• .... Sidewalk 55 OUTFACE CONTROL HYDRANT D SEE NOTE #4 IN THE .O in WATER METER 2 water main Buffer ti TRIANGLE Buffer TRIANGLE UTILITY BOX STRUCTURE GENERAL NOTES ON EXISTING CURB UT 0 .. . 2 SEE NOTE #4 IN THE •• �•••� CURB INLET CATCH BASIN: •• .. SHEET S. s-- o ' GENERAL NOTES ON EXISTING CURB CUT PROPOSED FIRE CURB INLET CATCH BASIN: EXISTING CURB CUT THROAT ELEV, = 62.52 CURB CUT EX STIN U EXISTING C � •• ' ••� "� I G CURB C== SHEET S.2 HYDRANT *SOUTH: 18" RCP, INV. ELEV. = 58.5 BILIT BILIT SIGHT VISIBILITY SIGHT VISIBILITY • ' � ••••�- .. THROAT ELEV. = 63.76 "'•••••. , � F�da, TRIANGLE TRIANGLE *NORTH: 18" RCP, INV. ELEV. = 59.0 *NORTH: 124" RCP, I INV. ELEV. =58.0 UNKNOWN TRIANGLE I Y p TRIANGLE * *EAST: 5" RCP, NV ELEV. = SEE NOTE #4 IN THE SEE NOTE #4 IN THE * *EAST: 18" RCP, INV. ELEV. = UNKNOWN • "" "' • ••-•• .... ••. SEE NOTE #4 IN THE SEE NOTE 4 IN THE SEE DUMPSTER GENERAL NOTES ON GENERAL OTES ON d BOARDON BOARD ... ......:.... ........................,, ....,.•....:.:................. ........ PRESSURE TREATED 4 "X4 "'PRESSURE WOOD FENCING TREATED POST (FINISHED SIDE 8' O.C. MAX. FACING OUTWARD) I CONCRETE MASONRY WALL CONSTRUCTION 1.) WALLS Materials, construction and quantity control of masonry shall be in accordance GENERAL NOTES ON with Uniform Building Code (UBC), Chapter 24. General conditions and GENERAL NOTES ON F-w° *FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION during grouted masonry work. D W z W *FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Grade 60. Vertical reinforcement shall be placed in the center of the SHEET S.2 = °a SHEET 2 2. If a slab dowel does not line -up with a vertical core, it shall not be sloped SINGLE ENCLOSURE X <> CD o_. 3. Horizontal wall reinforcement shall be standard truss type DUR -O -WALL (or I o SHEET S.2 4. Hollow Load- bearing Concrete Masonry Units shall be normal weight SHEET S.2 conforming to ASTM C -90, with a minimum compressive strength of 1,900 AS -BUILT STATE JOB #15570 -3605 •••••. .• • •• ....:......... -MAINTAIN 2" AS -BUILT STATE JOB #15570 -3605 ......... "' "' DETAIL ON SHEET S.2 '' '`• ........... 5.) GATES 6. Coarse grout shall conform to ASTM C -476, with a maximum aggregate size • BETWEEN BOTTOM w /privacy -type slats inserted in galvanized steel mesh fabric, * *FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION hinge- mounted on min. 3" diameter galvanized steel post. (Gates and post constructed and installed per applicable building ;:.•,. ••• code by licensed fence contractor). * *FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION •• ...... _ FOR SPECIFICATIONS N grouting. 1/2" dia. 18" long metal rod gate latch. Provide 3/4" dia. hole 2 (MIN.) 6" into concrete for rods. In asphalt provide a 3/4" P.V.C. greater the 1/z ", mortar droppings or other foreign material. All cells shall be in AS -BUILT STATE JOB 15007 -3501 FINISH GRADE �s VZ5Z ® U V U AS -BUILT STATE JOB 15007 -3501 IN- GROUND TRAFT FiC1 ;;••:, CONTROL BOX O middle bond beam masonry. 8.) BOLLARD I 1 V ..... ............................... _ ............ .--- ..........,...,......, - -. ............ -------- ,................:..............,.......,•... ......,..................•..... ...... .............. d BOARDON BOARD ... ......:.... ........................,, ....,.•....:.:................. ........ PRESSURE TREATED 4 "X4 "'PRESSURE WOOD FENCING TREATED POST (FINISHED SIDE 8' O.C. MAX. FACING OUTWARD) I CONCRETE MASONRY WALL CONSTRUCTION 1.) WALLS Materials, construction and quantity control of masonry shall be in accordance W • with Uniform Building Code (UBC), Chapter 24. General conditions and of concrete block (8 "x8 "x16 "). Materials used should be F-w° J during grouted masonry work. ° W z W Materials) Grade 60. Vertical reinforcement shall be placed in the center of the b.) Existing: maximum 6' -0' high replacement materials can = °a W 2. If a slab dowel does not line -up with a vertical core, it shall not be sloped co X <> CD o_. 3. Horizontal wall reinforcement shall be standard truss type DUR -O -WALL (or 8"x16" concrete w /2- #5 continuous rebar imbedded. o o 4. Hollow Load- bearing Concrete Masonry Units shall be normal weight Monolithic, min. 6" thickness w /imbedded 6 "x6 "/ 10x10 welded conforming to ASTM C -90, with a minimum compressive strength of 1,900 d PSI. 4.) CONCRETE FILLED CELLS -MAINTAIN 2" I masonry in running bond with 3/8" mortar joints. Provide complete coverage every 4' O.C. CLEARANCE 5.) GATES 6. Coarse grout shall conform to ASTM C -476, with a maximum aggregate size Constructed of min. 1 -1/2" diameter galvanized tubular steel BETWEEN BOTTOM w /privacy -type slats inserted in galvanized steel mesh fabric, 28 days. hinge- mounted on min. 3" diameter galvanized steel post. (Gates and post constructed and installed per applicable building OF FENCE AND code by licensed fence contractor). all of all cells to verify grout placement. Clean -outs shall be sealed after TOTAL IMPERMEABLE AREA SQUARE FEET: FINISH GRADE N grouting. 1/2" dia. 18" long metal rod gate latch. Provide 3/4" dia. hole 8• Prior to grouting, the grout space shall be clean, with no mortar projections 6" into concrete for rods. In asphalt provide a 3/4" P.V.C. greater the 1/z ", mortar droppings or other foreign material. All cells shall be in sleeve, 6" long, or equal. FINISH GRADE 7.) SOIL 9. During placing, grout shall be consolidated with flexible cable vibrator. First Soil bearing capacity to be at least 2,500 P.S.F. grout pour shall be stopped a minimum of 1 - 1/2" below the top of the O middle bond beam masonry. 8.) BOLLARD I z S -6" high, 6" diameter steel pipe bollard filled with concrete, BACKFILL WITH N CONCRETE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA painted traffic yellow, imbedded S -0" deep in 18" concrete AROUND POST I = U EXCAVATE THREE TIMES THE WIDTH N.T.S. OF THE POST Detail 'A' Typical 6' Wood Privacy Fence Section L 6" dia, Steel • bollards conc, Filled (typD;I- 10, 81 "- U \ I C a� Q_ L U 4 0 Q) d F0 a 48 12' _ Max clearance rein, o0 4' N, Min. (D PLAN N.T.S, General Notes 1. OUTSIDE MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT TO BE LOCATED ON THE ROOF OF THE BUILDING 2. ALL OUTSIDE MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT SHALL BE COMPLETELY SCREENED FROM VIEW FROM PUBLIC STREETS AND PROPERTIES. ROOFTOP EQUIPMENT TO BE SCREENED WITH PARAPET WALLS. 3. PARKING SPACES, ALL AISLES APPROACH LANES, AND MANEUVERING AREAS SHALL BE CLEARLY MARKED WITH DIRECTIONAL ARROWS AND LINES ACCORDING TO THE STANDARDS SET FORTH IN THE MANUAL ON UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES (MUTCD) AS ADOPTED BY THE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND AS APPROVED BY THE CITY ENGINEER 4. ALL SUBSTANDARD SIDEWALKS AND SIDEWALK RAMPS ADJACENT TO OR PART OF THE PROJECT SHALL BE BROUGHT INTO COMPLIANCE WITH A.D.A. AND THE REQUIREMENTS OF F.D.O.T. INDEX #304 -SEE SHEET S.8 FOR SPECIFICATIONS. 5. AN ASBESTOS SURVEY IS REQUIRED PRIOR TO CONDUCTING AN DEMOLITION OR RENOVATIONS. CONTACT THE PINELLAS COUNTY AIR QUALITY DEPARTMENT AT (727) 464 -4422 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION. 6. REDEVELOPMENT MUST COMPLY WITH ORDINANCE NO 7617 -06 RADIO SYSTEM REGULATIONS FOR BUILDINGS, INSTALL 911 RADIO REPEATER /ANTENNA BOOSTER SYSTEM. 7. OWNER SHALL COMPLY WITH THE CURRENT TRANSPORTATION IMPACT FEE ORDINANCE AND FEE SCHEDULE AND PAY FEE PRIOR TO CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY. Tie bear) with 1 - #5 rebar continuous 12' _ clearance min, 6 drop 1 T� �� I 1�� pin typ,) Gr A swing gate (typ,) 1 - #5 at 4' center Grade 14' u gate 8" swing 6t. swing p,s,i, concrete slab 8 "x 16" concrete with fiber mesh reinforcing - rlonolithic, min 6" footing w/ 2- #5 rebar (typ,) thickness, 6x6 / 10x10 W.W.F. drop pin ELEVATION hole (typ,) N.T.S. CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA PUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATION ENGINEERING DRAWN BY DATE 2 8/16/04 Rev. Notes B.V.D. E.A. 6/01 Rev. Notes R.G. CHECKED BY DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE INDEX NO. 1 4/9/02 D.M. SINGLE DESIGNED BY 701 REV. DATE DESCRIPTION APP. T.G. 100 PUBLIC R /A; 80 ASPHALT PA VING :.: (40 M.P.H. Posted) 2a Of (t1r6 NOTES: CONCRETE MASONRY WALL CONSTRUCTION 1.) WALLS Materials, construction and quantity control of masonry shall be in accordance a.) New construction: maximum 6' -0' high and constructed with Uniform Building Code (UBC), Chapter 24. General conditions and of concrete block (8 "x8 "x16 "). Materials used should be construction requirements shall be applied as specified in UBC, Section 2404 (f), consistent with those used in the construction of and during grouted masonry work. architectural style of the principal building. (Section 3 -802 1. All reinforcing steel shall be deformed bars conforming to ASTM A -615, Materials) Grade 60. Vertical reinforcement shall be placed in the center of the b.) Existing: maximum 6' -0' high replacement materials can masonry cell, and shall be held in position at the top and bottom. be made of the some materials as long as they are made of 2. If a slab dowel does not line -up with a vertical core, it shall not be sloped approved opaque material. more than one horizontal in six verticals (1: 6). 2.) FOOTINGS 3. Horizontal wall reinforcement shall be standard truss type DUR -O -WALL (or 8"x16" concrete w /2- #5 continuous rebar imbedded. equivalent) at 16' o. c.. 3.) CONCRETE SLAB 4. Hollow Load- bearing Concrete Masonry Units shall be normal weight Monolithic, min. 6" thickness w /imbedded 6 "x6 "/ 10x10 welded conforming to ASTM C -90, with a minimum compressive strength of 1,900 wire fabric (W.W.F.), 3000 P.S.I. with fiber mesh reinforcing. PSI. 4.) CONCRETE FILLED CELLS 5. Mortar shall be type M or S, in accordance with ASTM C -270. Place all With 1 - #5 vertical rebar tied to footer steel at each corner and masonry in running bond with 3/8" mortar joints. Provide complete coverage every 4' O.C. face shell mortar bedding, horizontal and vertical. 5.) GATES 6. Coarse grout shall conform to ASTM C -476, with a maximum aggregate size Constructed of min. 1 -1/2" diameter galvanized tubular steel of 3/8 ", 8" to 10" slump, and a minimum compressive strength of 2,500 PSI at w /privacy -type slats inserted in galvanized steel mesh fabric, 28 days. hinge- mounted on min. 3" diameter galvanized steel post. (Gates and post constructed and installed per applicable building - - required at the bottom course 7. Minimum 3" X 3" clean out holes (saw cut) are Ir code by licensed fence contractor). all of all cells to verify grout placement. Clean -outs shall be sealed after TOTAL IMPERMEABLE AREA SQUARE FEET: masonry inspection - provided in accordance with ACI 531 -4.6, and before 5.) DROP PIN grouting. 1/2" dia. 18" long metal rod gate latch. Provide 3/4" dia. hole 8• Prior to grouting, the grout space shall be clean, with no mortar projections 6" into concrete for rods. In asphalt provide a 3/4" P.V.C. greater the 1/z ", mortar droppings or other foreign material. All cells shall be in sleeve, 6" long, or equal. vertical alignment, and shall solidly be filled with coarse grout as specified. 7.) SOIL 9. During placing, grout shall be consolidated with flexible cable vibrator. First Soil bearing capacity to be at least 2,500 P.S.F. grout pour shall be stopped a minimum of 1 - 1/2" below the top of the .95 ALW. middle bond beam masonry. 8.) BOLLARD S -6" high, 6" diameter steel pipe bollard filled with concrete, CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA painted traffic yellow, imbedded S -0" deep in 18" concrete = U PUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATION ENGINEERING foundation. (See Detail) � U DRAE BY DATE 2 08/16/04 Rev. Notes B.V.D. A 6/01 o 1 4/9/02 Rev. Notes R.G. CHECKED BY D.M. DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE INDEX NO. 701 Cn'^ 80 0 I "i 0 NOTES CO REV. DATE DESCRIPTION APP. DESIGNED BY T.G. 0 32" TURN -OUT COURSE - (1) #5 REBAR VERT. IN I THREE COURSES ONLY CELL POURED SOLID ENDS AND 8' -0" @ O.C. WITH CONCRETE (TYP) El I (MIN.) 0 TURN -OUT COURSE 8" 32"x12" CONIC. FOOTER WITH (3) #5 REBAR CONT. 00 TOP OF WALL ELEV. =63.00 z . z oW )=z 0o z W W J I W J V) Sn I TOP VI EW ALUMINUM PIPE RAIL TOP AT 42" (MIN.) ABOVE ADJACENT GRADE Z_ POST ONE COURSE OF KNOCK -OUT SUPPORT N BLOCK WITH 1 - #5 CONT. REBAR BRACKET �4 POURED SOLID WITH CONCRETE TOP OF POND WALL ELEV. = 47.00 1 - #5 REBAR IN SOLID POURED CELL 24" O.C. (MIN.) d- 1 i10 ^ <,a (PAVED SURFACE( O PROPOSED TREE SIZE, TYPE & LAND AREA SQUARE FEET: z a N/A TURN OUT COURSE LAND AREA ACRES: �N WA ENDS AND 8' -0" GROSS FLOOR AREA SQUARE FEET: 25,569 55% ALW. (26.576) O.C. (MIN.) USE: RETAIL BOTTOM OF POND ELEV. = 60.00 N FILL ALL CELLS SOLID WITH - CONCRETE. 1 32" 32 "X12° CONIC. FOOTER WITH 90' HOOK AT EVERY (4) #5 REBAR CONT. AND 1 VERTICAL REBAR #5 REBAR PERPENDICULAR 4' -0" O.C. SECTION N.T.S. I Typical Pond Wall Section 'C' I L 15,5So, -7 Legal Description A PARCEL OF LAND LOCATED IN SECTION 22, TOWNSHIP 29 SOUTH, RANGE 15 EAST, PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA. BLOCK 'E', LOTS 17 THROUGH 24, AND BLOCK 3, LOT 24, AND THE EAST 1/2 OF THE VACATED RIGHT OF WAY OF SOUTH STREET; ALL OF THE PLAT OF "LAKEVIEW HEIGHTS ", AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 13, PAGE 5, IN THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA. ALL OF THE ABOVE LESS THE EAST 10 FEET FOR RIGHT OF WAY FOR SOUTH MISSOURI AVENUE. Site Tabulation Table DESCRIPTION EXISTING REQUIRED /ALLOWED PROPOSED TREE SIZE, TYPE & LAND AREA SQUARE FEET: 48,320 N/A 48,320 LAND AREA ACRES: 1.11 WA 1.11 GROSS FLOOR AREA SQUARE FEET: 25,569 55% ALW. (26.576) 16,374 USE: RETAIL N/A MEDICAL TOTAL NUMBER OF PARKING SPACES: 31 47 REQ.* 47 TOTAL NUMBER OF H C SPACES: 1 2 REQ. 2 TOTAL PAVED AREA SQUARE FEET: 15,796 N/A 16,653 VUA % OF PAVED AREA: 100% N/A 92% 3' PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT PB 13, PG 5 N/A PB 13, PG 5 BUILDING HEIGHT IN FEET 19.5 25 25 TOTAL IMPERMEABLE AREA SQUARE FEET: 44,888 95% ALW. (45,904) 34,838 TOTAL PERVIOUS AREA SQUARE FEET: 3,432 N q 13,4b' FLOOR AREA RATIO (FAR): .53 .55 ALW. .34 IMPERVIOUS SURFACE RATIO (ISR): 93 .95 ALW. .72 * 16,374 SF Q 3/1000 SPACES = 49 REQUIRED SPACES, LESS TWO REQUIRED SPACES PER ARTICLE 3, DIVISION 2, SECTION 3- 201.D.4 = 47 TOTAL REQUIRED Legend FOOTPRINT OF DEMOLISHED BUILDING SHOWN THUS: " "' " "'" "''" " " " "' TREE SIZE, TYPE & LOCATION SHOWN THUS: 0" TREE TREES TO BE REMOVED X 0" TREE SHOWN THUS: EXISTING CONTOURS SHOWN :..:. THUS: :..:........:::... . .... ..... .. .... VUA INTERIOR LANDSCAPING AREA SHOWN THUS; SANITARY SEWER LINES SHOWN THUS: rn WATER LINES SHOWN THUS: -w -w- OVERHEAD POWER LINES ohw SHOWN THUS: ~CD PROPOSED FIRE HYDRANT FHA SHOWN THUS: SITE VISIBILITY TRIANGLE 'cn Y LINE SHOWN THUS: o �r 1: v Z IL W 0 Z >�o L7 4 - o Z (D Z 4 Ln 1- [7 N Ism W Q13M _LL ,.. 03 0 1-4W W aICl LL NOEL � a W M Q � 3 I.. j ANY STRUCTURES OR Sheet -� PLANTINGS IN THE SIGHT TRIANGLE MUST BE LESS THAN 30" IN HEIGHT OR 20.00 HAVE 8' OF CLEAR TRUNK (TYP) ' 2 T wnshi 15 Section 22, Range 9, o p aCn wz o- OQO C) p ~CD > M 'cn Y LLJ •� N 0 W z w Z w � J � = U � U Of � a o Cn'^ 80 0 I "i 0 CO 0 I DO CU O N a Z 1: v Z IL W 0 Z >�o L7 4 - o Z (D Z 4 Ln 1- [7 N Ism W Q13M _LL ,.. 03 0 1-4W W aICl LL NOEL � a W M Q � 3 I.. j ANY STRUCTURES OR Sheet -� PLANTINGS IN THE SIGHT TRIANGLE MUST BE LESS THAN 30" IN HEIGHT OR 20.00 HAVE 8' OF CLEAR TRUNK (TYP) ' 2 T wnshi 15 Section 22, Range 9, o p � I- .� -,- -,,- - ,/- -7 I STY FRAME RES. #1353/ "/ FF = 655/�.63 GARA 3E FF = 63 9 /// �1 � \� -IC ,//v 2 STY FR RES. / #1345/ / FF = 63.75 X/ 01 77/y, 1 STY M A S IR X. - ES' 0 W, j // 2 STY IF R RES.' STY FIR RES./ 2 STY FIR RES. #1341' /#1337 '/ X #3/ F�F =63.49 7 11 b2l FF = 62.83 L 'B' FOR - FF 64 IONS U-) o 0 I OVA CL Fa 9 PROPOSE 6' WOOD �7z. --m m i Buffer Pj�IVCY FENCE IN MWINVIN. FM q • 4 9'x 10'ALUM SHED 5 CN 0 III N d SI E DETAIL 'A' FOR ohw- R&R. 0 'wood fence Sl IPRIONS LID Ell 11111 - - ■ 0Will ■ AffAl MY is �illi'l,R",Jll• ' I'I �� i .. • �I •_� n� R IM A MAC-DATE !V"2 STY FIR RES. Category Name Common/Scientific Size. Spacing _&0ing-T Quantity LINE SHOWN THUS: CO (0 C) 70 Q :3 ctl W .!t' U) > CD of 0 0 (3) 10' Clear Trunks Min. Proposed FF=62.68/- S RES lb2�// Shade Tree R IES 10' 2.5" Min. DBH 1319/ 0 3 F= 62.62 7 0 3 62 OAK QUERCUS SPP. IF 61.69 25' - 35' co 3 4 OVERHEAD POWER LINES 00 3 Palm Tree 3 FOXTAIL PALMS a) -1-4 FH 00 Q. Shade Tree MAPLE ACER SPP. 10, 2.5 " Min. 25' - .35' 0 5 5 T7o< 1 Palm Tree DBH Trunks Min. PLAN 0 29 29 CRAPE MYRTLE 8' 18-24" Min. F1 _G] Shrub GOLDEN DEWDROP Height; 3 36" O.C. 0 117 117 Shrub RHODODENDRON HYBRIDS Gallon Min. 36" O.C. 0 14 14 F I 01A_ INDIA HAWTHORN 18-24" Min. 7 17-4-U-1 HYBISCUS 18-24" Min. Lbr,.Y. �. _._ ,,,�-_�.._�.��.�.. ��__._- __.__,\`►��. _ _ 1131 '�,r... :TAT' -! � � , _ _� 5'/ 61.4( M 18-36 Prop. So ete 9.70 MO VF SHED T_ �� / SF • 1�)UUI TOE OF SLOPE --FOOTPRINT OF 0 EXISTING (' / / 5.99 16" CONC. C��B:] BUILDING TO BE it 20'M.B.S.L. (D 20'M.B.S.L. DEMOLISED Interi PROPOSED / / or (8) 9'xl8'Spaces Intef(c/r//, CL / /�� / 0 10, EXISTING 1 STORY MASONRY COMMERCIAL BUILDING CIO 12ADri e Aisle ,0 an s�ca Interior WOOD GATEI T= 2� // /Z / T, Landscapin Landscaping 24' Drive Aisle Landscaping AREA = 16,374 SQ. FT. Lands9appg A �0, a) PROPOSED POND WALLI 10 'o & RAILING SEE 4�j 5 7 3 n LZ Buffer �t&t 4� HEIGHT 19.5'& 13.0' - f I e " - -1 91 Uso, G U) ---: Prop. DRAINPIPE TO 0 SECTION DETAIL 'C' A </ED CURB INLET CD 'A Co 1-e Ll o- s_F1 In 01-0 FOR SPECIFICATIONS __4__�'. - n V/?L, .01t 0 Sidewalk En d) WO "T _.d V HEIGHT 19.5' A -65 1�t ID. U U) - . - CU ..... CD 1/0 24.00 18.00 24.00 (1) 18.00 P 0 CL ;;z 'D 1 8 00 4 4, 2 1 1 0 1 0 CL U) _C0 - - - - Z /ClI , . C:_�J? : M CL WHEEL] U) CL 0 ZO CL 0 C < 00 0') C:) U) cli M P 9) STOP (TYP) e ?< - A' 4 CL < Entry U) 0 (n 00 E m a7 < I a) 0 -?< U) HEIGHT= 13.0' L_j - 4. 1 C) Accessible C0 C2 (D 0 4* c V) 1/1 SF 0 CL 0) C.0 Co 0) M C\1 EO > j L_ 6 - 0 :;t n ❑ / / / / I QII 0 Landsc i _J& 'S�: Cq 4� o co 4, X 0 18.00 24.00 18.0 w Q L0 C) CN or) ED 00 ('.69 cN' Z [6" _CONC. CURbi Exit-/ co C113 _j cn LO W/vi J�u 4 [7AC,,�SSIBLE RAMP a n FW_o_w_1 18.00 18.00 0 ka Interior pi� [M 4 24.00 T,- -Us-caping 4" 0 'd C U) _j .,o 11an Qp� FA� n U) 1 4 .. Entry fo 25'M.B S L 41 C:? Prop. 5'Conc Sid M ... _Vl�t C Cf) LL 1400 F- LL in U)/LL 4 \/V 4 4 7.32 2t I - 4 - - .. " . Covered entry- O C\j b a d. U Lan U. 00 C 40 149 49 N 2 6. 13 :�p ... ... ....0 El - (9 Q) . ...... -C 5'Landscaping 3pi F2 _2H] -�q I CO ) 0 -1-4 CIO 2 14.00 3 8 B S 0 / . ..... 14.00 191 Zm . . . . . . . . . . . . . ...... .. ... ... 00 14.0 53 SF p 24. 6 6J 0 - M�� N 27J 7 1171 pp SO 13`1 WE 512.1 &S) 3 F 181 CO LLL� .. ... .. ......................... -7 PP 4 IL CU -oh - C/) . .......... Jt 15 ........ . ..... w A. 4 4. w W, 4 c S eWalKw EXST. CURB CUT EXST CURB CUT Z EXST. CURB CUT EXST. CURB CUT Exst. 2'Conc. I Curb PROPOSED FIRE 15'Landsca Cc C0 9" water main HYDRANT T1_ UTILITY I (D Buffer .9 S TRIANGLE SIGHT VISIBILITY sanitary line-/ 2'Conc. Curb I Buffer -_ __1 WATER METER IGI I r VISIBILITY] Landscaping TRIANGLE EXIS]ING CURB CUT =OX Buffe EXISTING CURB CUT PROPOSED FIRE CURB INLET CATCH BASIN: HYDRANT CURB INLET CATCH BASIN: EXISTING CURB C UT THROAT ELEV. = 62.52 EXISTING CURB CUT .....E.X.ISTING CURBICUT 10 ISIGHT VISIBILITY SIGHT VISIBIL I 1-Yj THROAT ELEV. = 63.76 *SOU TRIANGLE *SOUTH: 18" RCP, INV. ELEV. = 58.5 *NORTH: 18" RCP, INV. ELI-V. 59.0 SIGHT VISIBILI SIGHT VISIBILITY A, **EAST: 18" RCP, INV. ELEV. UNKNOWN *NORTH: 24" RCP, INV. ELEV. = 58.0 TRIANGLE TRIANGLE • **EAST: 15" RCP, INV ELEV. = UNKNOWN IN-GROUND TRAFFIC *FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATIO *FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION CONTROL I 'SINGLE' ENCL SEE DUMPSTER AS-BUILT STATE JOB #155/0-3605 AS-BUILT STATE Joe #15570-3605 ENCLOSURE **FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATIO N **FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DETAIL ON SHEET S.2 AS =BUILT STATE JOB #15 07-3501 AS-BUILT STATE JOB #15007-3501 FOR SPECIFICATIONS • 17-U U-I?l -A VH-A 00 .......... .............. ... ....... ......... .... .... ... ...... ........... ....................... .......... .......... ...... V) ............ ......... ...... --------- (D Z 0 100 PUBLIC RZP-, BO' A.-,IPZZA.L.T PA VZArC .... ..... Landscaping Notes General RIMMIN,: UNDFRTAKI N ON ANY EXISTING TREES SHALL BE 111RIHNI-1) IN A,'(,NDANCI WIIII THE NATIONAL ARBORIST ASSOCIATION th/\A) 1, IlNlrj(, I ANDA,II)S :/.) A[ I fi\L I , m ml IN oIN si r[ t)IIALI BE PROTECTED BY TREE I INO I FC I 1)N I iAl N11 RS /\I A 10' RADIUS, EXCEPT WHERE LAND Al IL RA I ON Ilk ONSIF\"JCIION ACTIVITIES ARE APPROVED WITHIN THE I)RII I I IN.. � I I I RF L I IROTI CTION DETAIL ON THIS SHEET FOR HAIIRIIN ('UN', II ACTION BARRIERS SHAI L REMAIN IN PLACE UNTIL I AND Al 11 NA III J AND ON.,-,TRUC TION A( TIVITIES ARE COMPLETED. ,.) MIN' P, I N1, A[ 11 IcA11ON AND CONSIRUCTION ACTIVITIES, IT 'A IAI I I UN, A 11 UI I( R1 MOVE VFGETA IION BY GRUBBING OR TO III A(J III I I I )',I I), III HNI , SO[ VI_N IS, CONSTRUCTION MATERIAL, MACHINI (-I,, ) I III R QUIPMEN I OF ANY KIND WITHIN FHE DRIP I INI 01 A IkI I I() NI MAIN ON If II: SITL UNLESS OTHERWISE APPROVI 1) B1 I IL CIFY 4.) NO ' I IADI I �FFS 10 BF PLANTED WFIHIN 25 FEET OF OVERHEAD 1OWER I NFS t).) PRO' IUL S" \41NIMUM COVERAGE OF CYPRESS OR PINE BARK MULCH (IN Al I ILANTER BEDS. 3.) MAINTAIN 4' UNDISTURBED PROTECTIVE RADIUS AROUND EXISTING JAK TRI S. 7.) NO ONDIJII TO BE INSTALLED WITHIN PROTECTIVE TREE RADIUS. 3.) ALI �;REFNSIACE OIHER THAN MULCHED PLANT BEDS TO ST. 4000SlI:;I CNA, � USING SOD WHICH IS CLEAN, FREE OF WEEDS, IE STS, / ND I)ISI ASE. Irrigation Notes I AN \U I CIM/' I IC PF RMANI NF IRRIGATION SYSTEM PROVIDING COMPLETE WATI__R COVERAGE FOR ALL REQUIRE 1) AND OiIIFR I / NDSCAI ING MATERIALS Sl IALL BE PROVIDED AND MAINTAINED AS A FULLY F UCTIONING SYSTEM IN O)RDLI< 10 PHI -)ERVE IHE I ANDSCAPING IA A HEALTHY GROWING CONDITION. 1 A[ I IHHI(,AIION SY IEMS CONNECTED TO THE PUBLIC POTABLE WATER SUPPLY SYSTEM SHALL INCLUDE A BACKI OW PRI VENTER AT HE SERVICE CONNECTION. 5. Al I llNHI(,AI:0N SY!,TEM:, SHALL BE INSTALLED SO AS TO MINIMIZE SPRAY UPON ANY 1011 RVIOUS SURF A( I ,,UCI I SS'11)1 VV \1 KS AND PAVED AREAS. 4 Al I lNlRl(:A 1,()N SY', I E MS SHAI L INCLUDE A RAIN SENSOR/SHUT OFF SERVICE 10 AVOID IRRIGA FION DURIN1, I I-kl()l • HI 1 .1 .1 1 C11 N I RAINFALL. t). UNI R(;I\()I Il) IRRI,;ATION SHAI I NO I BE INSTALLED WITHIN THE DRIPLINES Of EXISTING IREE�; UNLESS R.)O I PRO I I IION M ASURI ARI: PROM ). 6. IF i VAIIA131 i RICI AIMFI) WAIT SHALL BE USED FOR IRRIGATION PURPOSES. (40 M.P.H. Posted) Symbol Category Name Common/Scientific Size. Spacing _&0ing-T Quantity LINE SHOWN THUS: CO (0 C) 70 Q :3 ctl W .!t' U) > CD of 0 0 (3) 10' Clear Trunks Min. Proposed Total O Shade Tree SOUTHERN MAGNOLIA MAGNOLIA GRANDIFLORA 10' 2.5" Min. DBH 25' - 35' 0 3 3 0 Shade Tree OAK QUERCUS SPP. 10' 2.5 " Min. DBH 25' - 35' co 3 4 OVERHEAD POWER LINES 00 3 Palm Tree 3 FOXTAIL PALMS a) -1-4 FH 00 Q. Shade Tree MAPLE ACER SPP. 10, 2.5 " Min. 25' - .35' 0 5 5 T7o< 1 Palm Tree DBH Trunks Min. PLAN 0 29 29 CRAPE MYRTLE 8' 18-24" Min. OAccent Tree LAGERSTROEMIA INDICA 2" Min. 10 15 J jo Jo FAURIEI DBH WAX MYRTLE 8 E) MYRICA CERIFERA 2" Min. 8' 12' 0 11 11 Shrub Height; 3 36" O.C. 0 43 43 ROSA-SINENSIS Gallon Min. IXORA 18-24" Min. FIX-1 Shrub Height; 3 35" O.C. 0 291 291 CORRINEA 001lon Min, JASMINE UE Ground Cover TRACHELOSPERMUM 1 Gallon 24" O.C. 0 167 167 ... .. ....... JASMINOIDES Min. Section 22 - ----- Range 29,11T -Legend Accent Tree UNDER CANOPY TREE DBH SITE VISIBILITY TRIANGLE LINE SHOWN THUS: TREE SIZE, TYPE & 3 Palm Tree Cluster 3 PAUROTIS PALM ACOELORRHAPHE WRIGHT11 (3) 10' Clear Trunks Min. 4' - 8- 0 2 6 256' THUS: Palm Tree CANARY ISLAND DATE PALM PHOENIX CANARIENSIS FICUS PUMILA 10' Clear Trunks Min. AS SHOWN ON PLAN 0 8 95 co WATER LINES SHOWN THUS: -w- -w- OVERHEAD POWER LINES PLUMBAGINOIDES 3 Palm Tree 3 FOXTAIL PALMS 1 n' r.1 FH SHOWN THUS: Q. I _7 Shrub Height; 3 36" O.C. 0 43 43 ROSA-SINENSIS Gallon Min. IXORA 18-24" Min. FIX-1 Shrub Height; 3 35" O.C. 0 291 291 CORRINEA 001lon Min, JASMINE UE Ground Cover TRACHELOSPERMUM 1 Gallon 24" O.C. 0 167 167 ... .. ....... JASMINOIDES Min. Section 22 - ----- Range 29,11T -Legend Cluster WODYETIA BIFURCATA Trunks Min. SITE VISIBILITY TRIANGLE LINE SHOWN THUS: TREE SIZE, TYPE & -1p] Vine CREEPING FIG 1 Gallon 24" O.C. AT 0 256 256' THUS: ...... Shrub FICUS PUMILA Min. BASE OF FENCE 0 95 95 co WATER LINES SHOWN THUS: -w- -w- OVERHEAD POWER LINES PLUMBAGINOIDES Gallon Min. PROPOSED FIRE HYDRANT FH SHOWN THUS: Q. Efl SABAL PALM 10' Clear AS SHOWN ON 1 0 1 Palm Tree SABAL PALMETTO Trunks Min. PLAN 0 29 29 AZALEA 18-24" Min. F1 _G] Shrub GOLDEN DEWDROP Height; 3 36" O.C. 0 117 117 Shrub RHODODENDRON HYBRIDS Gallon Min. 36" O.C. 0 14 14 F I 01A_ INDIA HAWTHORN 18-24" Min. 7 Shrub Height; 3 36" O.C. 0 43 43 ROSA-SINENSIS Gallon Min. IXORA 18-24" Min. FIX-1 Shrub Height; 3 35" O.C. 0 291 291 CORRINEA 001lon Min, JASMINE UE Ground Cover TRACHELOSPERMUM 1 Gallon 24" O.C. 0 167 167 ... .. ....... JASMINOIDES Min. Section 22 - ----- Range 29,11T -Legend FOOTPRINF OF DEMOLISHED RAPHICLEPIS INDICA Gallon Min. SITE VISIBILITY TRIANGLE LINE SHOWN THUS: TREE SIZE, TYPE & -1p] LOCATION SHOWN THUS: PLUMBAGO 18-24" Min. X 0- TREE SHOWN THUS: EXISTING CONTOURS SHOWN THUS: ...... Shrub CERATOSTIGMA Height; 3 36" O.C. 0 95 95 co WATER LINES SHOWN THUS: -w- -w- OVERHEAD POWER LINES PLUMBAGINOIDES Gallon Min. PROPOSED FIRE HYDRANT FH SHOWN THUS: Q. Efl AMERICAN BEAUTYBERRY 18-24" Min. Shrub Height; 3 36" O.C. 0 29 29 CALLICARPA AMERICANA Gallon Min. F1 _G] GOLDEN DEWDROP 18-24" Min. Shrub Height; 3 36" O.C. 0 14 14 DURANTA REPENS Gallon Min. 17-4-U-1 HYBISCUS 18-24" Min. Shrub Height; 3 36" O.C. 0 43 43 ROSA-SINENSIS Gallon Min. IXORA 18-24" Min. FIX-1 Shrub Height; 3 35" O.C. 0 291 291 CORRINEA 001lon Min, JASMINE UE Ground Cover TRACHELOSPERMUM 1 Gallon 24" O.C. 0 167 167 ... .. ....... JASMINOIDES Min. Section 22 - ----- Range 29,11T -Legend FOOTPRINF OF DEMOLISHED BUILDING SHOWN THUS: SITE VISIBILITY TRIANGLE LINE SHOWN THUS: TREE SIZE, TYPE & LOCATION SHOWN THUS: 0" TREE TREES TO BE REMOVED X 0- TREE SHOWN THUS: EXISTING CONTOURS SHOWN THUS: ...... VUA INTERIOR LANDSCAPING AREA SHOWN THUS: SANITARY SEWER LINES SHOWN THUS: co WATER LINES SHOWN THUS: -w- -w- OVERHEAD POWER LINES ohw SHOWN THUS: PROPOSED FIRE HYDRANT FH SHOWN THUS: Q. SITE VISIBILITY TRIANGLE LINE SHOWN THUS: 0 ANY STRUCTURES OR CN PLANTINGS IN THE SIGHT TRIANGLE MUST BE LESS THAN 30" IN HEIGHT OR 20.00 HAVE 8' OF CLEAR TRUNK (TYP) nship 15 6 Z a. W 3 0 Z > w L7 a 13 Z Z 4 Ln M D W Z EO (3 j LL 03 J 3 IL Z W 13 jo W <I 0 �- CL W F- W /,j 00/1. r 1 no= 'QJ /W 11� Z Lf" L'+ ;1 LEGEND N =om 4 -; .......... EXIST. 2 FT CONTOUR D � 00 o 3: °W EXIST. 5 FT CONTOUR W N a = PROP. CONTOUR w I LL CL no I w — ••– ••– ••– •• –••— PROP. DRAINAGE PIPE Q 11 v 3 ® PROP. CATCH BASIN ails w o PROP. OUTFALL STRUCTURE T. x62.8 PROP. SPOT GRADE ELEV.° ti�_R, :,_M� r'�•- GWT GROUNDWATER TABLE;;] .y •. STATE op Sheet ., ...• .tip 0' 5' 10' 20' 40' 80' SCALE 1 " = 20' 1-, .4 ii w TOP EL. = 62.0 0 w z —' 1' -10" I 8' -0" I 2't DRY DETENTION POND SECTION A —A NOT TO SCALE ALUMINUM SKIMN CONCRETE PAD UNDER SKIMMER DESIGN HIGH WATER LEVEL 25 YR. STORM ELEV. = 61.0- TOP OF BANK 6" FREEBOARD MIN. VERTICAL RETAINING WALL (SEE SITE PLAN FOR SPECIFICS) PLAN VIEW N 5-3/4" - G RATE TOP OF OUTFALL EL. = 60.5 WATER QUANTITY — WEIR ALUMINUM SKIMMER WATER QUALITY 5 -3/4" 4' -4" ,„ STEEL GRATE SCI. E T PLAN StOp- SEE TABLE FOR SLOPE CULVERT PLANNED I END SECTION CULVERT LENGTH SLOPE DETAIL DHW 25 —YEAR 'FALL PIPE r STORM = 61 0 0 „ 5.75" 4.5 r r ® N 1 -- 4 0 Q Z SLOPE BOTTOM EL. = 60.0 • NATURALLY OCCURING SAND - GWT = 6'f DEEP INFILTRATION RATE = 0.03875 FT. /MIN. DRY DETENTION POND SECTION A —A NOT TO SCALE ALUMINUM SKIMN CONCRETE PAD UNDER SKIMMER DESIGN HIGH WATER LEVEL 25 YR. STORM ELEV. = 61.0- TOP OF BANK 6" FREEBOARD MIN. VERTICAL RETAINING WALL (SEE SITE PLAN FOR SPECIFICS) PLAN VIEW N 5-3/4" - G RATE TOP OF OUTFALL EL. = 60.5 WATER QUANTITY — WEIR ALUMINUM SKIMMER WATER QUALITY 5 -3/4" 4' -4" ,„ STEEL GRATE SCI. E T PLAN StOp- SEE TABLE FOR SLOPE CULVERT PLANNED I END SECTION CULVERT LENGTH SLOPE DETAIL EYE BOLTS PER FDOT INDEX 201 3' -4" a m GROOVED END ON OUTLET END SECTION TONGUE END ON INLET END SECTION (OR END SECTION TO FIT PIPE USED) T C B X T 'Y A BAR OR STEEL FABRIC REINFORCEMENT IAMETER R END VIEW IG D NOTE: DESIGN OF END SECTION SHALL CONFORM TO STANDARD T G REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE, LONGITUDINAL SECTION AASHTO CLASS III PIPE FLARED END DETAIL NOT TO SCALE TYP E E STRAIGHT BARS 2" x 16" RETICULINE BARS 1-11Y4 " x 3/16" A BANDS 1-1/2" x 1/4" APPROX. WEIGHT 215LBS G 0 0.�0_ GRATE 2.5" 0 I LU M 2' -4" 2' -4" Li in N 1.5" 2" 1.5" z 0 I i� 0 3' -4" TOP CATCH O SCALE BAST N 5 NOT T o. �o 'FALL PIPE r to MINIMUM to N „ 5.75" 4.5 r r ® M r w 0 Q Z 4. m • N N EYE BOLTS PER FDOT INDEX 201 3' -4" a m GROOVED END ON OUTLET END SECTION TONGUE END ON INLET END SECTION (OR END SECTION TO FIT PIPE USED) T C B X T 'Y A BAR OR STEEL FABRIC REINFORCEMENT IAMETER R END VIEW IG D NOTE: DESIGN OF END SECTION SHALL CONFORM TO STANDARD T G REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE, LONGITUDINAL SECTION AASHTO CLASS III PIPE FLARED END DETAIL NOT TO SCALE TYP E E STRAIGHT BARS 2" x 16" RETICULINE BARS 1-11Y4 " x 3/16" A BANDS 1-1/2" x 1/4" APPROX. WEIGHT 215LBS G 0 0.�0_ GRATE 2.5" 0 I LU M 2' -4" 2' -4" Li in N 1.5" 2" 1.5" z 0 I i� 0 3' -4" TOP CATCH O SCALE BAST N 5 NOT T o. �L / of DTTOM EL. 6" 59.33 SECTION 2' -6" ACCORDING TO THE SOIL REPORT THE ESTIMATED SEASONAL HIGH WATER TABLE IS APPROXIMATELY 9 FEET 2 INCHES BELOW THE SURFACE SEE FLARED END DETAIL FILTER FABRIC SECTION A -A Bury End Of Fabric 12" Min. UO NOTES: 21p PLAN 1. FILTER FABRIC SHALL MEET FDOT STANDARD SPECIFICATION 145 � 2. THE ROCK RIPRAP SHALL MEET FDOT STANDARD SPECIFICATION 330 -2.2 4 PTPo END TREATMENT AT POND SCALE ' ZCONC 8 — OUTFALL PIPE . PAD # BARS 15" MINIMUM ®12" CTNS 4 "N MIN CR INSTALL 6" ( OSS SECTION GRAVEL BEDDING) NOTES: FASTEN SKIMMER WITH 4 STAINLESS FDOT TYPE E INLET (MODIFIEQ� STEEL; BOLTS W/ LEAD ANCHORS 2. SEAL ALL EDGES OF SKIMMER AT CONTACT POINTS WITH STRUCTURE WITH STORM SEWER 0 UTFALL CONTROL WATERPROOF CAULKING OR APPROVED EQUAL METAL GRATE 31-.4" 5.75" 2 TOP EL. = 62.6f „ 5.75" 4.5 W,�UNDER WALLS: 3,000 P.S.I. AK 4. • CONC. 8" THICK WITH #4 REBAR ® 12" O.C. 8" 2P -O$I 8" EACH WAY 0 1410" RCP INV. =60.3 N FOOTER PAD: 3,000 P.S.I. CONC. 8" DEEP WITH #5 REBAR ® 6" O.C. EACH WAY �L / of DTTOM EL. 6" 59.33 SECTION 2' -6" ACCORDING TO THE SOIL REPORT THE ESTIMATED SEASONAL HIGH WATER TABLE IS APPROXIMATELY 9 FEET 2 INCHES BELOW THE SURFACE SEE FLARED END DETAIL FILTER FABRIC SECTION A -A Bury End Of Fabric 12" Min. UO NOTES: 21p PLAN 1. FILTER FABRIC SHALL MEET FDOT STANDARD SPECIFICATION 145 � 2. THE ROCK RIPRAP SHALL MEET FDOT STANDARD SPECIFICATION 330 -2.2 4 PTPo END TREATMENT AT POND SCALE ' ZCONC 8 — OUTFALL PIPE . PAD # BARS 15" MINIMUM ®12" CTNS 4 "N MIN CR INSTALL 6" ( OSS SECTION GRAVEL BEDDING) NOTES: FASTEN SKIMMER WITH 4 STAINLESS FDOT TYPE E INLET (MODIFIEQ� STEEL; BOLTS W/ LEAD ANCHORS 2. SEAL ALL EDGES OF SKIMMER AT CONTACT POINTS WITH STRUCTURE WITH STORM SEWER 0 UTFALL CONTROL WATERPROOF CAULKING OR APPROVED EQUAL NOT TO SCALE TRENCH DETAIL NOTES: 1. GRAVEL EMBEDMENT SHALL BE COMPACTED TO A MINIMUM 95% STANDARD PROCTOR DENSITY. USE HAND TAMPERS OR VIBRATORY COMPACTORS. 2. AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER, FILTER FABRIC SHALL BE INSTALLED AGAINST THE EXCAVATION WALLS AND /OR BOTTOM, WHEN FINE SANDS, SILT, CLAY, OR ORGANIC MATERIALS ARE ENCOUNTERED AT THE TRENCH BOTTOM. 3. MAXIMUM TRENCH WIDTH FROM BOTTOM OF TRENCH UP TO 12" ABOVE THE TOP OF PIPE SHALL BE 3 FT. UNDER PAVEMENT - ^BIT. CONC. AND BASE COURSES AS DETAILED I I` SUITABLE BAC K Fl LL MATERIAL COMPACTED GRAVEL BORROW INITIAL BACKFILL (INSTALL AND COMPACT IN 6" LAYERS) T COMPACTED GRAVEL BORROW HAUNCHING (INSTALL IN 6" LAYERS) LPIPE D '18" COMPACTED GRAVEL BORROW BEDDING SPRINGLINE (,INSTALL IN 6 LAYERS) D +2' -0" FIRM SUBGRADE OR COMPACTED BACKFILL 3' -0" (MIN.) REMOVE UNSUITABLE MATERIAL AS DIRECTED AND BACKFILL WITH GRAVEL BORROW.) TYPICAL DRAINAGE PIPE DETAIL NOl TO SCALE DUMP S1 1" REBAR FOR BAG REMOVAL FROM INLET SILTSACK ,STRUCTURE W,�UNDER DRAIN 4. NOT TO SCALE TRENCH DETAIL NOTES: 1. GRAVEL EMBEDMENT SHALL BE COMPACTED TO A MINIMUM 95% STANDARD PROCTOR DENSITY. USE HAND TAMPERS OR VIBRATORY COMPACTORS. 2. AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER, FILTER FABRIC SHALL BE INSTALLED AGAINST THE EXCAVATION WALLS AND /OR BOTTOM, WHEN FINE SANDS, SILT, CLAY, OR ORGANIC MATERIALS ARE ENCOUNTERED AT THE TRENCH BOTTOM. 3. MAXIMUM TRENCH WIDTH FROM BOTTOM OF TRENCH UP TO 12" ABOVE THE TOP OF PIPE SHALL BE 3 FT. UNDER PAVEMENT - ^BIT. CONC. AND BASE COURSES AS DETAILED I I` SUITABLE BAC K Fl LL MATERIAL COMPACTED GRAVEL BORROW INITIAL BACKFILL (INSTALL AND COMPACT IN 6" LAYERS) T COMPACTED GRAVEL BORROW HAUNCHING (INSTALL IN 6" LAYERS) LPIPE D '18" COMPACTED GRAVEL BORROW BEDDING SPRINGLINE (,INSTALL IN 6 LAYERS) D +2' -0" FIRM SUBGRADE OR COMPACTED BACKFILL 3' -0" (MIN.) REMOVE UNSUITABLE MATERIAL AS DIRECTED AND BACKFILL WITH GRAVEL BORROW.) TYPICAL DRAINAGE PIPE DETAIL NOl TO SCALE DUMP S1 1" REBAR FOR BAG REMOVAL FROM INLET SILTSACK 00 O O o CO w CO aa) O 0� U) CO ai N CC -F-+ 0 0 0 Z STRAP _A_n FLOW FLOW o-- uvivir Pte• EXPANSION RESTRAINT (1/4 NYLON ROPE, 2' FLAT WASHERS) 4. SECTION VIEW BAG DETAIL NOTES: 1. SILTSACKO SHALL BE MANUFACTURED R D FROM A SPECIALLY DESIGNED WOVEN POLYPROPELNE GEOTEXTILE AND SEWN BY A DOUBLE NEEDLE MACHINE, USING HIGH STRENGTH NYLON THREAD. 2. SILTSACK® WILL BE MANUFACTURED TO FIT THE OPENING OF THE CATCH BASIN DROP INLET. SILTSACK® WILL HAVE THE FOLLOWING FEATURES: TWO DUMP STRAPS ATTACHED AT THE BOTTOM TO FACILITATE THE EMPTYING OF SILTSACK®; SILTSACK® SHALL HAVE LIFTING LOOPS AS AN INTEGRAL PART OF THE SYSTEM TO BE USED TO LIFT SILTSACK® FROM THE BASIN; SILTSACK® SHALL HAVE A RESTRAINT CORD APPROXIMATELY HALFWAY UP THE SACK TO KEEP THE SIDES AWAY FROM THE CATCH BASIN WALLS, THIS YELLOW CORD IS A VISUAL MEANS OF INDICATING WHEN THE SACK SHOULD BE EMPTIED. ONCE THE STRAP IS COVERED WITH SEDIMENT, SILTSACK® SHOULD BE EMPTIED, CLEANED AND PLACED BACK INTO THE BASIN. _TEMPORARY SILT SACKSILT SACK NOT TO SCALE V z a 3 w 0z �W E3 Z aM Ln N Ion e� �LL ro J 0i13 LL NAIL O W m Q� 3 F- �i 4. • • 00 O O o CO w CO aa) O 0� U) CO ai N CC -F-+ 0 0 0 Z STRAP _A_n FLOW FLOW o-- uvivir Pte• EXPANSION RESTRAINT (1/4 NYLON ROPE, 2' FLAT WASHERS) 4. SECTION VIEW BAG DETAIL NOTES: 1. SILTSACKO SHALL BE MANUFACTURED R D FROM A SPECIALLY DESIGNED WOVEN POLYPROPELNE GEOTEXTILE AND SEWN BY A DOUBLE NEEDLE MACHINE, USING HIGH STRENGTH NYLON THREAD. 2. SILTSACK® WILL BE MANUFACTURED TO FIT THE OPENING OF THE CATCH BASIN DROP INLET. SILTSACK® WILL HAVE THE FOLLOWING FEATURES: TWO DUMP STRAPS ATTACHED AT THE BOTTOM TO FACILITATE THE EMPTYING OF SILTSACK®; SILTSACK® SHALL HAVE LIFTING LOOPS AS AN INTEGRAL PART OF THE SYSTEM TO BE USED TO LIFT SILTSACK® FROM THE BASIN; SILTSACK® SHALL HAVE A RESTRAINT CORD APPROXIMATELY HALFWAY UP THE SACK TO KEEP THE SIDES AWAY FROM THE CATCH BASIN WALLS, THIS YELLOW CORD IS A VISUAL MEANS OF INDICATING WHEN THE SACK SHOULD BE EMPTIED. ONCE THE STRAP IS COVERED WITH SEDIMENT, SILTSACK® SHOULD BE EMPTIED, CLEANED AND PLACED BACK INTO THE BASIN. _TEMPORARY SILT SACKSILT SACK NOT TO SCALE V z a 3 w 0z �W E3 Z aM Ln N Ion e� �LL ro J 0i13 LL NAIL O W m Q� 3 F- �i O O u J N CEMENTITIOUS COATING OVER BAND DETAIL BLOCK B SHEET CD.1 37.83 TILE ROOFING BAND DETAIL E SHEET CD.1 12 BAND DETAIL 5 BAND DETAIL E SHEET W.1 E SHEET CD.1 BAND AIL -- — BAND DETAIL A SHE T E I CEMENTITIOUS COATING OVER BAND DETAIL BAND oETAa EA HEET CD1 BLOCK B SHEET col CEMENTITIOUS I B SHEET CD1 \}_,I = _ — = CEMENT111OUS _ . COATING OVER \ n BLOCK COATING OVER BLOCK L i i BAND DETAIL AWNING AWNING C i1 SHEET CD CEMENTITIOUS COATING OVER BAND DETAIL BLOCK BAND DETAIL H SHEET LD.1 H SHEET LD1 II DEE BAND DETAIL BAND DI,ETAIL BAND DETAIL BAND DETAIL BAND DETAIL BAND DETAIL D SHEET CD.1 D SNEEt CD.1 o SHEET col PRE —CAST o srEEr col D sHEEr co.t PRECAST o SHEET cot pRE —CAST WATER TABL 7 O 7 9 WATER TAIL WATER TABL Right Elevatiorft TILE ROOFING 12 5 BAND DETAIL A SHEET CD1 f CEMENTITIOUS CEMENTITIOUS CEMENTITIOUS COATING OVER COATING OVER COATING OVER BLOCK BLOCK BLOCK t v CEMENTITIOUS COATING OVER BLOCK 251 .83 .I 1 ,�i*....... 1 ! 3w I / - -- 12 i m I CEMENTITIOUS COATING OVER BLOCK O rO u / N 12 5 12 Q 5 CEMEN11TIOUS COATING OVER BLOCK Will . — M - - I. aI3Tr1i� O . Q � cu cu O N W N cu I cu Z U V Ec co • O 1 STY FRAME RES. #1353 GARAGE FF = 65.63 FF = 63.97 Landscapinq Buffer Z -n o�5 vN 1 STY MAS RES #1349 FF = 64.22 ` � '>i i R o a N 3 9' x 10' ALUM SHED m 6' wood fence = FF =6389 • n scaplrJ9............ Interior Buffer Landscaping F� st ,oa �gsAh pa�e� h?aif c ID a ID U d N C/) c J O) Q n = 7 O U3 Cn Q :x X UJ w w cn Fxs� AC?1,0 ha /f Accessible w U elf Entry 2 (0 EO a) X Q Interior Interior r U) 2 STY FR RES. #1345 FF = 63.75 2 STY FR RES. #1341 FF =63.49 ROOM FF = 61.9 U Prop. Stormwater Retention Pond v Z SHED METAL o 0O co o 0 Interior a(D 10'X14' BO v U o. z .................... ::.:..... .12' Landsca-in Bu ier . Landscaping FF =63.60 FIR1 /2., U0 ID ` Landscaping v Of O I! I 0 O M CD 12' Drive Aisle 0 LL ° 7 U) LL cm � L M co Ad`e�sphd 'o. r 'Drop o® � � U a) U) M co w r- d- N e /f C.n ca j o 'nn:- i .. � J Lo � ra GP�� `` ° y At spha /7 eft C6 - n Cvul GO�GC _U -n ,.....:a.... U) .........tic w Y �j Q C a Accessible _.._ _ �........ ............... U y 1 STY MAS RES #1349 FF = 64.22 ` � '>i i R o a N 3 9' x 10' ALUM SHED m 6' wood fence = FF =6389 • n scaplrJ9............ Interior Buffer Landscaping F� st ,oa �gsAh pa�e� h?aif c ID a ID U d N C/) c J O) Q n = 7 O U3 Cn Q :x X UJ w w cn Fxs� AC?1,0 ha /f Accessible w U elf Entry 2 (0 EO a) X Q Interior Interior r U) 2 STY FR RES. #1345 FF = 63.75 2 STY FR RES. #1341 FF =63.49 105.8' scaping Landscaping ndscaping Prop. 5' Conc Sidewalk gsph /tj Olt f t (4) 23'x8' Parallel Spaces �s 15' Landscaping Land - d - s - p t q scaping Buffer nve isle - ---- �� - Buffer eft pp ° HEIGHT = 19.5' EXST. CURB CUT Landscaping Buffer Existing Sign 5 + ::::::::::.::::::::::::: ..... ::.:..::80. Sqr are..F et C CC 2 STY FR RES. #1337 W = 63.34 2 STY FR RES. #1333 FF = 62.83 N00 °00'00 "E 511.80' (R &M) ------ L-andscaping - Buffer..... 251.45' X 44.8' Covered n i �,JeLandscaping _ Buffer - EXST. CURB 1 STORY MASONRY COMMERCIAL BUILDING AREA = 16,766 SQ. FT. HEIGHT = 19.5'& 13.0' `= 100.62' 15' Landscaping Buffer — — — — - -MrS00 °13'18 "E 512.18' (R &S) sanitary line - 2" water main / r, i 1 !: / i VA09 10, 100' PUl&LIC R /H; 60' ASPHALT PAVING (40 M.P.H. Posted) Proposed Monument Sign 11'-0" 66 Square Feet 2 STY FR RES. #1329 FF = 62.68 1 STY FR RES #1327 FF= 62.62 1 STY FR RES #1323 FF = 62.07 dMAFDATE 1 STY FR RES #1319 FF = 61.69 cr .•e Prop. Outfall -Wur e Land us ; "J R" Control Structure U� :,=.,.tFi is Land 2.:,. ,., .... H =:: L: i..•3 c> ..r:ir. �?:>fii; : \i.? 6'X 6' ,; U LL METAL LL SHED o i : FF 62.2 z Prop. Catch Basin SHED SCREEN 1 STY FR RES #1315 FF = 61.46 ...... 7iiEiZR RIJ METAL 3' Public Utility Easement SHOWER STALL ROOM FF = 61.9 U Prop. Stormwater Retention Pond : zAure 1,wid Use ; SHED METAL o 3 0 Interior 0 10'X14' BO v U o. WOOD SHED .................... ::.:..... .12' Landsca-in Bu ier . Landscaping FF =63.60 FIR1 /2., U0 ID tD Landscaping v 3' Public Utility O M CD 12' Drive Aisle to J 105.8' scaping Landscaping ndscaping Prop. 5' Conc Sidewalk gsph /tj Olt f t (4) 23'x8' Parallel Spaces �s 15' Landscaping Land - d - s - p t q scaping Buffer nve isle - ---- �� - Buffer eft pp ° HEIGHT = 19.5' EXST. CURB CUT Landscaping Buffer Existing Sign 5 + ::::::::::.::::::::::::: ..... ::.:..::80. Sqr are..F et C CC 2 STY FR RES. #1337 W = 63.34 2 STY FR RES. #1333 FF = 62.83 N00 °00'00 "E 511.80' (R &M) ------ L-andscaping - Buffer..... 251.45' X 44.8' Covered n i �,JeLandscaping _ Buffer - EXST. CURB 1 STORY MASONRY COMMERCIAL BUILDING AREA = 16,766 SQ. FT. HEIGHT = 19.5'& 13.0' `= 100.62' 15' Landscaping Buffer — — — — - -MrS00 °13'18 "E 512.18' (R &S) sanitary line - 2" water main / r, i 1 !: / i VA09 10, 100' PUl&LIC R /H; 60' ASPHALT PAVING (40 M.P.H. Posted) Proposed Monument Sign 11'-0" 66 Square Feet 2 STY FR RES. #1329 FF = 62.68 1 STY FR RES #1327 FF= 62.62 1 STY FR RES #1323 FF = 62.07 dMAFDATE 1 STY FR RES #1319 FF = 61.69 cr .•e Prop. Outfall -Wur e Land us ; "J R" Control Structure U� :,=.,.tFi is Land 2.:,. ,., .... H =:: L: i..•3 c> ..r:ir. �?:>fii; : \i.? 6'X 6' ,; U LL METAL LL SHED o i : FF 62.2 z Prop. Catch Basin SHED SCREEN 1 STY FR RES #1315 FF = 61.46 ...... 7iiEiZR RIJ METAL 3' Public Utility Easement SHOWER STALL ROOM FF = 61.9 U Prop. Stormwater Retention Pond 12x8' WD SHED 11 BAD SHED METAL o Exs 6' wood fen e E� Interior • BO v U a � co .................... ::.:..... .12' Landsca-in Bu ier . Landscaping LO FIR1 /2., U0 ID ............ ............ Proposed Attached Sign Z o Q c(D � n o w LL ------ - - - - -- -- J_.... 2' Conc. Curb 24 Square Feet U Prop. Stormwater Retention Pond O 1 o 0 E� Interior BO v U a � co LO Landscaping v O M N prop 12' Drive Aisle to J 1 U) LL °v � L M co Ad`e�sphd .� r 'Drop o® � � a) U) M O CN d- N e /f Interior Landscaping j o A q N -O Lo � ra n/�I .J.. ° y At spha /7 eft C6 - n Cvul Va 3(D ,.....:a.... .:.:...... .........tic w Y Q C a Accessible U y -' Entry HEIGHT= 13.0' EO U C) x CL U 00)) c ONi az < � o0o Y 3 �� N U CL ii0 U co D ` W o v a) c nj x x N OD m o v LO W U io ao m o) Arop A rop O a N AaL Aa qs . ;0 p v.. Ps hd/ ............. ep� 1 ::...:: U a ��°::a�f df � Q v o _ 5' Landscaping 15' Landscaping - - - EL7anU*sc—ap-,n-q- ? o _ - —� Buffer pp r ° o ° 6' cone sidewalk Proposed Attached Sign Z o Q c(D � n o w LL ------ - - - - -- -- J_.... 2' Conc. Curb 24 Square Feet 0 0 p M 'w C4 m O a� 0 Fz� O 1 o 0 E� N � co LO 1 -� M v O M U) to J 1 U) LL °v � L M .� r o® � � U) M O CN d- N Z U j o cc co N -O Lo e� r n/�I .J.. ° 0 0 p M 'w C4 m O a� 0 Fz� rr HANDICAPPED SIGNS ------------ -SEE INDEX N0. 119 ON SHEET S.8 CONC. WALK RAMP DOWN RAMP DOWN CONC. WALK SEE INDEX NO. 109 � SEE INDEX NO. 109 WIDE TRAFFIC BLUE STRIPE TRAFFIC WHITE (TYPICAL) + 6" WIDE TRAFFIC WHITE ft L Ve " STRIPE (TYPICAL) 6 STROKE 0 (TYPICAL) q0• 5'-0" A 5'-0" 12'-0 2" (TYPICAL) 12'-0" 29'-0" NOTE: All pavement markings to be thermoplastic. HANDICAPPED STALL DETAIL CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA PUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATION REDRAWN BY ENGINEERING DATE TYPICAL DOUBLE 5/99 CHECKED _�_Y_ INDEX NO. M•Q• HANDICAPPED STALL 118 REV. DATE DESCRIPTION APP, DESIGNED BY 10 21MR911 60 ' PUBLIC R/W EXST. 6" PVC WATER LINE CONNECT TO EXISTING WATER MAIN AS DIRECTED BY THE CITY OF CLEARWATER ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT LLJ d' 1 LU x LU Finish grade to allow 0.4' min,, 1,0' max. fa(( from property line to Baclx< of curIOT Minimum 36' Behind Back Of Curb Or Edge of Paveme 36" I rrvvri SECTION EXST. 6" PVC WATER LINE FIH EXST. 20' Public Drainage and Utility Easement -City of Clearwater Resolution No. 71-92 20' Public FEa Easement Resolution 2 STY FR F OF R'A 7!; jam(e a n o u Double -Sweep Tee-, R/W sidewalk 30'-36' or as Directed by the City CITY OWNED HOMEOWNER OWNED AND AND MAINTAINED MAINTAINED ANY VARIANCE MUST HAVE ervice Lateral, WRITTEN APPROVAL OF THE CITY ENGINEER, CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA PUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATION ENGINEERING 2 3/04 Revised Per Utilities REDRAWN BY STREET LATERAL DATE D,Klnq 10117102 CHECKED BY DETAIL INDEX NO. & 1 7/03 1 Move C.O. Into R/W 305 REV.1 DATE I DESCRIPTION I APP. IDESID 1�' GNED BY 1 OF 3 C' .......... r7//77A 2 STY FIR RES FF =b3.49 2 STY FIR RES. #11337 FF =63.34 .. . .... ..... . .. ........... . ...... : *+ ... I ..... ..... ... . .. ........... EXST. CURB CUT SIGHT VISII ILITY 133 / AR sanitary line-/ 2'Conc. Curb ... OUTFALL CONTROL 62.83 FF = 62.68 Buffer C) 00 Mill Ld Prop. Outfall C) Buffer ti Control Structure ... .... . .... ... SEE SHEEf,,S S.4 & E S.5 i4OR EXISTIN CURB CUT .... .... ... ..... Li SPECIFIC' TIONS 10h qj U) 0 (0 EXISTING CURB CUT THROAT ELEV. = 62.52 0 TRIANGLE SIGHT VISIBILITY •=3 '11 STY MAS RES *SOUTH: 18" RCP, INV. ELEV. = 58.5 • 1349 0 M 17F = 64.22/ ITRIANGLE ITRIANGLE I *NORTH: 18" RCP, INV. ELEV. _j *NORTH: • 24" RCP, INV. ELEV. = 58.0 LLJ d' 1 LU x LU Finish grade to allow 0.4' min,, 1,0' max. fa(( from property line to Baclx< of curIOT Minimum 36' Behind Back Of Curb Or Edge of Paveme 36" I rrvvri SECTION EXST. 6" PVC WATER LINE FIH EXST. 20' Public Drainage and Utility Easement -City of Clearwater Resolution No. 71-92 20' Public FEa Easement Resolution 2 STY FR F OF R'A 7!; jam(e a n o u Double -Sweep Tee-, R/W sidewalk 30'-36' or as Directed by the City CITY OWNED HOMEOWNER OWNED AND AND MAINTAINED MAINTAINED ANY VARIANCE MUST HAVE ervice Lateral, WRITTEN APPROVAL OF THE CITY ENGINEER, CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA PUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATION ENGINEERING 2 3/04 Revised Per Utilities REDRAWN BY STREET LATERAL DATE D,Klnq 10117102 CHECKED BY DETAIL INDEX NO. & 1 7/03 1 Move C.O. Into R/W 305 REV.1 DATE I DESCRIPTION I APP. IDESID 1�' GNED BY 1 OF 3 C' .......... r7//77A 2 STY FIR RES FF =b3.49 2 STY FIR RES. #11337 FF =63.34 .. . .... ..... . .. ........... . ...... : *+ ... I ..... ..... ... . .. ........... EXST. CURB CUT SIGHT VISII ILITY 133 / AR sanitary line-/ 2'Conc. Curb ... OUTFALL CONTROL 62.83 WHITE BORDER & SYMBOL BLUE BACKGROUND BLACK BORDER & LETTERS WHITE BACKGROUND BLACK BORDER & LETTERS WHITE BACKGROUND ALL LETTERS 1" SERIES "C" PARKING BY DISABLED PERMIT ONLY $255 FINE F.S. 318.18 Ict ICL STANDARD PRE-PAINTEE DISABLED PARKING SIGN ON 1/8" THICK SHEET ALUMINUM C� �n Ci 2" HOT DIPPED GALVANIZED STANDARD WEIGHT STEEL P11 4- 4, . . . 4i; i i 8 "X2' -6" CONCRETE MASS. FINISH TOP OF MASS LEVEL WITH A SLIGHT RAISED WASI APPROXIMATELY 1/2" ABOVE LEVEL OF TURF/SOD. 4*.l 1 4 < " < 0) HANDICAPPED &GN DETAIL CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA PUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATION ENGINEERING REDRAWN BY DATE A.C. 5/99 F- y E)- TYPICAL HANDICAPPED - 1 12/99 Updated Fine M.G. CHECKED INDEX NO. 11.0. - SIGN DETAIL 119 REV. DATE DESCRIPTION APP. DESIGNED M.G. TY FIR RES. /2 STY FR RES EXST. CURB CUT SIGHT VISII ILITY 133 / #11329// sanitary line-/ 2'Conc. Curb ... OUTFALL CONTROL 62.83 FF = 62.68 Buffer C) 00 Mill .... .... ... .... ..... ..... . ..... SEE SREET LATERAL .. .. .... .... . Prop. Outfall C) Buffer ti Control Structure ... .... . .... ... SEE SHEEf,,S S.4 & E S.5 i4OR EXISTIN CURB CUT .... .... ... ..... c jr:n: %,A D =4 SPECIFIC' TIONS 10h qj > (0 EXISTING CURB CUT 1 STY FIR #1327 FF= 62.62 1 ST j2 I TIREE ............................ ........... ................. ......... EVA ....... jj i:, * .... ... ...... o Q OV cr, . ..... ------- �....., . ...... ...... 11. "_'::.:.C; . ..... ............ - () r 0. T"I"In PDX- 0 f4m wo . .................. ------ WAIVAL P4A=E4Y' (W 05rZOrMIZ WAMV%ro MW M#,z% MAr-DATE 1 STY FIR 'FF = 61.6! 5'/ 61.46 FLAX p ga- 90 IN :67 M1 'a. Milk If sow 0AWPz • 01 Mgmm ; %Tt M M V ILI R t kR L Miff, _10 0- _"S� I g W p' I, W/1 (14 NO 111, - kj ........ . . ................... IPA, i t, n. . ► } 0 0 0:11 pa I N SAM as-0.1 a q RMINVA Ig L9 WAv Emu= Isrz M1. 1 0 V IN ME 16 1 qh%�A LM VA, FAFV FRI U 10 M. Utility Notes 1. SURVEY WORK WITHIN EASEMENTS, RIGHT-OF-WAY, AND WORK AREAS SHALL INCLUDE TREE LOCATIONS. 2. OWNER WILL WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL ASSOCIATED FEES FOR A REQUIRED REDUCED PRESSURE BACK FLOW PREVENTOR DEVICE. 3. OWNER SHALL PAY ALL APPLICABLE SEWER AND WATER IMPACT FEES PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF THE BUILDING PERMIT. 4. THE 3 FEET WIDE UTILITY EASEMENT LYING ALONG THE REAR PROPERTY LINE OF THE SITE SHALL BE STAKED OUT AND AN ENGINEERING EASEMENT INSPECTION REQUESTED AND APPROVED BEFORE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES COMMENCE. 5. ALL UTILITIES, INCLUDING INDIVIDUAL DISTRIBUTION LINES, SHALL BE INSTALLED UNDERGROUND. Landscaping EXST. CURB CUT EXST. CURB CUT SIGHT VISII ILITY .... . .... ... ..!�S T. CURB CUT Conc. TWO WAY CLEAN-OUT, .. ISidewal 1 sanitary line-/ 2'Conc. Curb ... OUTFALL CONTROL a s I g Buffer C) 00 Mill .... .... ... .... ..... ..... . ..... SEE SREET LATERAL .. .. .... .... . 2" water main STRUCTURE C) Buffer ti ... .... . .... ... EXISTING CURB CUT E CURB INLET CATCH BASIN: EXISTIN CURB CUT .... .... ... ..... CURBIC UT 10h qj > (0 EXISTING CURB CUT THROAT ELEV. = 62.52 LO TRIANGLE SIGHT VISIBILITY •=3 co *SOUTH: 18" RCP, INV. ELEV. = 58.5 SIGHT VISIBILITY 0 M ITRIANGLE ITRIANGLE I *NORTH: 18" RCP, INV. ELEV. _j *NORTH: • 24" RCP, INV. ELEV. = 58.0 TRIANGLE z TRIANGLE C/Cn ) LL 00 1PROPOSED FIREJ ... ••. .•• . .... **EAST: 18" RCP, INV. ELEV. UNKNOWN **EAST: 15" RCP, INV ELEV. = UNKNOWN IN-GROUND TRAFFICI PROVIDE LCOP CONNECTION SEE DUMPSTER CIO HYDRANT IC= *FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION CONTROL BOX FOR PROPOSED 6" WATER 'SINGLE' ENCLOSURE Lek RM W CU 0 C'4 z cc CY) ff LO p ga- 90 IN :67 M1 'a. Milk If sow 0AWPz • 01 Mgmm ; %Tt M M V ILI R t kR L Miff, _10 0- _"S� I g W p' I, W/1 (14 NO 111, - kj ........ . . ................... IPA, i t, n. . ► } 0 0 0:11 pa I N SAM as-0.1 a q RMINVA Ig L9 WAv Emu= Isrz M1. 1 0 V IN ME 16 1 qh%�A LM VA, FAFV FRI U 10 M. Utility Notes 1. SURVEY WORK WITHIN EASEMENTS, RIGHT-OF-WAY, AND WORK AREAS SHALL INCLUDE TREE LOCATIONS. 2. OWNER WILL WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL ASSOCIATED FEES FOR A REQUIRED REDUCED PRESSURE BACK FLOW PREVENTOR DEVICE. 3. OWNER SHALL PAY ALL APPLICABLE SEWER AND WATER IMPACT FEES PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF THE BUILDING PERMIT. 4. THE 3 FEET WIDE UTILITY EASEMENT LYING ALONG THE REAR PROPERTY LINE OF THE SITE SHALL BE STAKED OUT AND AN ENGINEERING EASEMENT INSPECTION REQUESTED AND APPROVED BEFORE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES COMMENCE. 5. ALL UTILITIES, INCLUDING INDIVIDUAL DISTRIBUTION LINES, SHALL BE INSTALLED UNDERGROUND. Landscaping EXST. CURB CUT EXST. CURB CUT SIGHT VISII ILITY .... . .... ... ..!�S T. CURB CUT Conc. TWO WAY CLEAN-OUT, .. ISidewal 1 sanitary line-/ 2'Conc. Curb ... OUTFALL CONTROL a s I g Buffer ANGLE WATER METER .... .... ... .... ..... ..... . ..... SEE SREET LATERAL .. .. .... .... . 2" water main STRUCTURE HYDRANT ... .... ..... Buffer ti ... .... . .... ... EXISTING CURB CUT DETAIL ON SHEET S.8 CURB INLET CATCH BASIN: EXISTIN CURB CUT .... .... ... ..... CURBIC UT SIGHT VISIBILITY EXISTING CURB CUT ... .. ....... PROPOSED 6"] EXISTING CURB CUT THROAT ELEV. = 62.52 TRIANGLE SIGHT VISIBILITY I . ..... WATER SIGHT VISIBILITY CURB INLET CATCH BASIN: THROAT ELEV. = 63.76 *SOUTH: 18" RCP, INV. ELEV. = 58.5 SIGHT VISIBILITY SIGHT VISIBILITY • ITRIANGLE ITRIANGLE I *NORTH: 18" RCP, INV. ELEV. 59.0 *NORTH: • 24" RCP, INV. ELEV. = 58.0 TRIANGLE z TRIANGLE 1PROPOSED FIREJ ... ••. .•• . .... **EAST: 18" RCP, INV. ELEV. UNKNOWN **EAST: 15" RCP, INV ELEV. = UNKNOWN IN-GROUND TRAFFICI PROVIDE LCOP CONNECTION SEE DUMPSTER HYDRANT *FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION CONTROL BOX FOR PROPOSED 6" WATER 'SINGLE' ENCLOSURE ci z 0. :1 W 3 0 z 0! W > - E9 4 E3 � 113 ZZ m Ln M M z LL Vo J 3 W a. z Ull H [L 3: 0 0! W 3 1J 3: ji j/j *FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION LINE A� DIRECTED BY THE DETAIL ON SHEET S.2 AS-BUILT STATE JOB #15570-3605 ... ..... ... AS-BUILT STATE JOB #15570-3605 .. ..... .... .... Sheet **FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION CITY OF CLEARWATER FOR SPECIFICATIONS **FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION� STATE JOB #15007-3501 AS-BUILT STATE JOB #15007-3501 ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT AS-BUILT ASY .......... O Uj? f .4 V _/\/, _H - ---------- .. . .... . ....... .... . ......................................................... .... . .. . . .............. ........... . . 100' PUBLIC SO - A_-%PJ7,4Z,2- PA VZIVG . . . . . .. . .. . ......... ........ ... ... •. .. .. (40 M.P.H. Posted) • section 22 Ran a 29 Tovvnshi 15 63--_ 64 y A-7. 1Dell ,0-3A- C,/ -1 Al v-A U--/1 V c/.dJ 100' PilBLIC 80' ASPHALT PAVING 1 LEGEN D- 61 W" EXIST. 2 FT CONTOUR EXIST. 5 FT CONTOUR — ••— •-- ••- -• —••— PROP. DRAINAGE PIPE ® PROP. CATCH BASIN O PROP. OUTFALL STRUCTURE X62.8 PROP. SPOT GRADE ELEV. GWT GROUNDWATER TABLE TRbkTMENT = 60.0 X61 ;0.3 60.0 fCH BASIN 32.6 #16 Rd 0' 5' 10' 20' 40' 80' SCALE 1" = 20' g 4y ' �sr • 4- Sheet i#ml 40 N 0o I O 4) > c O O Of E N > ''0 aIo > CO ai Z (o r- Q Ls) UI ca C.) C :3 O M U) cf) � 0 yaw Mn ono Qj co O co O M = .� � -a) cu ■� ti cu o O 0 0. U) ca Q °' z W U 1 N •O L p LLM Sheet i#ml N 0o I Q > c O O Of E > ''0 aIo cO CO ai Z U O UI = m W Z e� a) cf) 0 yaw ono Qj co O co O N 0 M N d' r -a) cu m ti ob o W 0 Z N Sheet i#ml Z I W 0 z w > ''0 aIo ® Z t0 Ls Z F [r1 U1 UI = m W Z e� =Lm 0 yaw ono W m�a U. m � W � Q W 110 1 I- Sheet i#ml