Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
FLD2008-02005
nf) JOft cpg M I n, °�l�rwater 0 Planning Department 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, Florida 33756 Telephone: 727 - 562 -4567 Fax: 727 - 562 -4865 ❑ SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION ❑ SUBMIT 14 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION - Plans and application are required to be collated, stapled, and folded into sets ❑ SUBMIT FIRE PRELIMARY SITE PLAN: $200.00 ❑ SUBMIT APPLICATION FEE $ _ CASE #: RECEIVED BY (staff initials): DATE RECEIVED: * NOTE: 15 TOTAL SETS OF INFORMATION REQUIRED (APPLICATIONS PLUS SITE PLAN SETS) FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project (Revised 07/11/2008) PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT— A. APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4- 202.A) APPLICANT NAME: MAILING ADDRESS: PHONE NUMBER: CELL NUMBER PROPERTY OWNER(S) List ALL owners on the deed AGENT NAME: MAILING ADDRESS: PHONE NUMBER: CELL NUMBER: Hashim Sullaiman. 1504 Garden Inc. 813 - 841 -8712 FAX NUMBER: 813 -433 -5553 813 - 841 -8712 EMAIL: hsullaiman@aol.com Same as Above Todd Pressman 727 -804 -1 FAX EMAIL: pressinc @aol.com B. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4- 202.A) PROJECT NAME: Garden Avenue Complex PROJECT VALUATION: $ 100,000.00 STREET ADDRESS 503 Marshall St., 1504 N. Garden Ave., Clearwater, FL 33755 PARCEL NUMBER(S): (9/29/15155530/000 /0100 PARCEL SIZE (acres): 0.18 A.C. PARCEL SIZE (square feet): 7720 SF LEGAL DESCRIPTION: See Attached PROPOSED USE(S): Retail and one Requested to permit a mixed use 1,610 SF of a retail space and one apartment, in the commercial (c) DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST: district under the provisions of section 2 -704 (c) ; a reduction to the landscape buffer along marshall street (N) from 10 to 4.96' (to pavement) and on sides also under provisions of section 3- 1202.G. buildina heiaht needs to be increased from 25' to 31'. Specifically identify the request (include number of units or square footage of non - residential use and all requested code deviations; e.g. reduction in required number of parking spaces, specific use, etc.) C: \Documents and Settings \nghovaee \Local Settings \Tempbrary'IMernet... b Files \Content.IE5 \G9AJ8L2N\ Comprehensive %201nfill %20Project %20 %%2%�yrw� l� 0 2C0; 07- 11[1].doc q� r Page 1 of 8 0 9 DOES THIS APPLICATION INVOLVE THE TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS (TDR), A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, OR A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED (CERTIFIED) SITE PLAN? YES _ NO _xx_ (if yes, attach a copy of the applicable documents) C. PROOF OF OWNERSHIP: (Code Section 4- 202.A.5) XSUBMIT A COPY OF THE TITLE INSURANCE POLICY, DEED TO THE PROPERTY OR SIGN AFFIDAVIT ATTESTING OWNERSHIP (see page 7) D. WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 3- 913.A) X Provide complete responses to the six (6) GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA — Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail: 1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. The resulting size and scale of the site will be comparable to surrounding projects in an area that sorely needs investment and redevelopment .... in the regard that this is a tough site to make construction and a viable use work. The finished project will be in better character, or equal to new developments, than what is in the vicinity. This includes convenience stores, public laundry uses and general retail. The bulk coverage, density and scale of the surrounding commercial properties are very similar to the property. 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. This development will encourage more investment, more improvement and more renovation. This is a site that will be a leader of investment in the vicinity as well as improvement. This will provide a huge increase in value at this property and will cause significant improvements in neighborhood of the proposed use. Vacant buildings in an area have a negative impact, so we need 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use. Again, this will only be a needed improvement to an area that could use improvement and investment. The removal of backing out parking has improved safety for pedestrians and handicapped. Vacant buildings do not promote safety. 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. The site meets parking codes. The removal of backing out parking has improved safety for pedestrians and handicapped. This small commercial development will not create traffic congestion. 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. Again, this project will be an improvement to the community character and will be an asset to an area that could use some investment and improvement. Since similar uses exist that are in differing states of disrepair, this site will be a leader for change in the area. 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts, on adjacent properties. The activity will be minimal and will be of the same character that surrounding uses maintain. We have improved visual aspect of this property with the elimination of the duplex on the corner, along with the proposed building and landscaping improvements. It coincides with a neighboring retail store. C: \Documents and Settings \nghovaee \Local Settings \Tempbrary Internet Files \Content.IE5 \G9AJ8L2N\ Comprehensive% 201nfill% 20Project% 20% 28FLID %`29 %202(�k,Dog7- '21 @048c { Page 2 of 8 ' DEVEi.ON..1 IT SERV , .,.4 IU27PT a a WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project Criteria) ❑ Provide complete responses to the six (6) COMPREHENSIVE INFILL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT CRITERIA — Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail: 1. The development or redevelopment is otherwise impractical without deviations from the use and /or development standards set forth in this zoning district. The proposed deviations from Code are necessary and minimal in order to make re -use of this existing site. Certain deviations are necessary in order to accommodate the existing building and the site legally developed a long time ago. The site is small and is impractical to develop without approval of requested deviations. There is a market demand in the vicinity and the uses that are proposed can work there- considering the surrounding community factors for example, the building height needs to be increased for safety of apartment plus for better aesthetic. Similarly, setbacks reductions are necessary for this project. The relief sought from the setbacks are required and the minimum necessary to accommodate use of the existing building, pavement and sidewalks. The increase in the overall height of the building is necessary as it is existing and necessary to provide adequate ceiling height for a apartment building. Adequate parking has been provided in order to meet the code requirements. 2. The development or redevelopment will be consistent with the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan, as well as with the general purpose, intent and basic planning objectives of this Code, and with the intent and purpose of this zoning district is common in the immediate area along the main arterial and is therefore compatible, in addition The use is permissible and being a mixed use with an affordable unit. This is a project that seeks to match surrounding uses and provide a substantial; and improvement and investment of a quality use. 3. The development or redevelopment will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of surrounding properties. This site matches uses in the vicinity and the zoning present on the site and the prevailing land use pattern. It will be an asset to encouraging others to invest and improve in the immediate area. The change in parking will be much safer for all involved and in the area. It will be an investment that will improve the area dramatically. It will not impede surrounding properties. The proposed use is compatible with the neighborhood. 4. Adjoining properties will not suffer substantial detriment as a result of the proposed development. The proposed development is similar to surrounding uses, is permissible by the zoning district and would be in market demand in the vicinity. The use is not detriment to uses typical of these locational aspects and will be an asset to the community. 5. The proposed use shall otherwise be permitted by the underlying future land use category, be compatible with adjacent land uses, will not substantially after the essential use characteristics of the neighborhood; and shall demonstrate compliance with one or more of the following objectives: a. The proposed use is permitted in this zoning district as a minimum standard, flexible standard or flexible development use; b. The proposed use would be a significant economic contributor to the City's economic base by diversifying the local economy or by creating jobs; c. The development proposal accommodates the expansion or redevelopment of an existing economic contributor; d. The proposed use provides for the provision of affordable housing; e. The proposed use provides for development or redevelopment in an area that is characterized by other similar development and where a land use plan amendment and rezoning would result in a spot land use or zoning designation; or f. The proposed use provides for the development of a new and /or preservation of a working waterfront use. a. The proposed use is permitted in this zoning district b. Retail store will create jobs and bring taxes to city. I n� n It is mixed use as directed by current planning directions. It c. The present use is compatible with surrounding uses. also a c accommodates the expansion or redevelopment I'-- , t ' !'V Flexibility to lot width, required setbacks, height and off - street parking are justified based on demonstrated compliance;with @4of 6. with regard use, the following design objectives: a. The proposed development will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of the surrounding properties for_ses permitted in this zoning district; LU b. The proposed development complies with applicable design guidelines adopted by the City; LL- c. The design, scale and intensity of the proposed development supports the established or emerging character of an area; In to form visually interesting and attractive appearance, the proposed development incorporates a substantial numbertof„.,.. d. order a cohesive, the following design elements: ❑ Changes in horizontal building planes; ❑ Use of architectural details such as columns, cornices, stringcourses, pilasters, porticos, balconies, railings, awnings, etc.; ❑ Variety in materials, colors and textures; ❑ Distinctive fenestration patterns; ❑ Building stepbacks; and ❑ Distinctive roofs forms. e. The proposed development provides for appropriate buffers, enhanced landscape design and appropriate distances between buildings. a. This will be vast improvement in aesthetics and improved parking, no backing out Proposed site will not impede surrounding properties, which are of similar size and use. b. Site complies applicable design guidelines adopted by the city. c. Project matches surrounding uses and provides improvement. d. Proposed building is cohesive attractive and similar to surrounding developments. e. Redevelopment includes new landscape areas. 'r- cc LI C.) E. STORMWATER PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteria Manual and 4- 202.A.21) A STORMWATER NARRATIVE MUST BE SUBMITTED WITH ALL APPLICATIONS. All applications that involve addition or modification of impervious surface, including buildings, must include a stormwater plan that demonstrates compliance with the City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteria manual. A reduction in impervious surface area does not qualify as an exemption to this requirement. ❑ If a plan is not required, the narrative shall provide an explanation as to why the site is exempt. ❑ At a minimum, the STORMWATER PLAN shall include the following; ❑ Existing topography extending 50 feet beyond all property lines; • Proposed grading including finished floor elevations of all structures; • All adjacent streets and municipal storm systems; • Proposed stormwater detention /retention area including top of bank, toe of slope and outlet control structure; • A narrative describing the proposed stormwater control plan including all calculations and data necessary to demonstrate compliance with the City manual. ❑ Proposed stormwater detention /retention area including top of bank, toe of slope and outlet control structure; ❑ Signature and seal of Florida Registered Professional Engineer on all plans and calculations. ❑ COPY OF PERMIT INQUIRY LETTER OR SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT (SWFWMD) PERMIT SUBMITTAL (SWFWMD approval is required prior to issuance of City Building Permit), if applicable ❑ ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF STORMWATER PLAN REQUIREMENTS (Applicant must initial one of the following): Stormwater plan as noted above is included Stormwater plan is not required and explanation narrative is attached. At a minimum, a grading plan and finished floor elevations shall be provided. CAUTION — IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A STORMWATER PLAN AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 562 -4750. F. SUPPLEMENTAL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 4- 202.A) SIGNED AND SEALED SURVEY (including legal description of property) – One original and 14 copies; TREE SURVEY (including existing trees on site and within 25' of the adjacent site, by species, size (DBH 4" or greater), and location, including drip lines and indicating trees to be removed) – please design around the existing trees; ❑ TREE INVENTORY; prepared by a "certified arborist ", of all trees 4" DBH or greater, reflecting size, canopy (drip lines) and condition of such trees; LOCATION MAP OF THE PROPERTY; ❑ PARKING DEMAND STUDY in conjunction with a request to make deviations to the parking standards (ie. Reduce number of spaces). Prior to the submittal of this application, the methodology of such study shall be approved by the Community Development Coordinator and shall be in accordance with accepted traffic engineering principles. The findings of the study will be used in determining whether or not deviations to the parking standards are approved; GRADING PLAN, as applicable; ❑ PRELIMINARY PLAT, as required (Note: Building permits will not be issued until evidence of recording a final plat is provided); ❑ COPY OF RECORDED PLAT, as applicable; .� --- C: \Documents and Settings \nghovaee \Local Files \Content.IE5 \G9AJ8L2N \Comprehensive %201nfill %20Proj4 Page 4 of 8 11 F ES 12 2€10 Tempora yinternet ;—o =� T 28FLD %29, %202008 %2007 =11 [1 ]:doc G. SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4- 202.A) SITE PLAN with the following information (not to exceed 24" x 36 "): Index sheet referencing individual sheets included in package; North arrow; Engineering bar scale (minimum scale one inch equals 50 feet), and date prepared; All dimensions; Footprint and size of all EXISTING buildings and structures; Footprint and size of all PROPOSED buildings and structures; All required setbacks; All existing and proposed points of access; All required sight triangles; Identification of environmentally unique areas, such as watercourses, wetlands, tree masses, and specimen trees, including description and location of understory, ground cover vegetation and wildlife habitats, etc; Location of all public and private easements; Location of all street rights -of -way within and adjacent to the site; Location of existing public and private utilities, including fire hydrants, storm and sanitary sewer lines, manholes and lift stations, gas _ and water lines; All parking spaces, driveways, loading areas and vehicular use areas; Depiction by shading or crosshatching of all required parking lot interior landscaped areas; Location of all solid waste containers, recycling or trash handling areas and outside mechanical equipment and all required screening {per Section 3- 201(D)(i) and Index #701); Location of all landscape material; Location of all onsite and offsite storm -water management facilities; Location of all outdoor lighting fixtures; Location of all existing and proposed sidewalks; and Floor plan typicals of buildings for all Level Two approvals. A floor plan of each floor is required for any parking garage requiring a Level Two approval. SITE DATA TABLE for existing, required, and proposed development, in written /tabular form: EXISTING REQUIRED PROPOSED Land area in square feet and acres; Number of EXISTING dwelling units; Number of PROPOSED dwelling units; Gross floor area devoted to each use; Parking spaces: total number, presented in tabular form with the _ number of required spaces; Total paved area, including all paved parking spaces & driveways, expressed in square feet & percentage of the paved vehicular area; Official records book and page numbers of all existing utility easement; Building and structure heights; Impermeable surface ratio (I.S.R.); and Floor area ratio (F.A.R.) for all nonresidential uses. ❑ REDUCED COLOR SITE PLAN to scale (8 % X 11); ❑ FOR DEVELOPMENTS OVER ONE ACRE, provide the following additional information on site plan: One -foot contours or spot elevations on site; Offsite elevations if required to evaluate the proposed stormwater management for the parcel; All open space areas; Location of all earth or water retaining walls and earth berms; _a•m .,,..,. , • .. . , - -• - -• - - --• _°- •? Lot lines and building lines (dimensioned); i ,• { " I -I ' `��1 Streets and drives (dimensioned); Building and structural setbacks (dimensioned); �'� +� q 2010 t l Structural overhangs; $ ; ` • -•' C: \Documents and Settings \nghovaee \Local Settings \Temporary Internet,/; Files \Content.IE5 \G9AJ8L2N\ Comprehensive %201nfill %20Project %20 %28FLD %29 %102008 %2007 Page 5 of 8 • H. LANDSCAPING PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4- 1102.A) LANDSCAPE PLAN with the following information (not to exceed 24" x 36 "): All existing and proposed structures; Names of abutting streets; Drainage and retention areas including swales, side slopes and bottom elevations; Delineation and dimensions of all required perimeter landscape buffers; Sight visibility triangles; • Delineation and dimensions of all parking areas including landscaping islands and curbing; Existing trees on -site and immediately adjacent to the site, by species, size and locations, including driplines (as indicated on required tree survey); Location, size, and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, indicated by a key relating to the plant _ schedule; Plant schedule with a key (symbol or label) indicating the size, description, specifications, quantities, and spacing requirements of all _ existing and proposed landscape materials, including botanical and common names; Typical planting details for trees, palms, shrubs and ground cover plants including instructions, soil mixes, backfilling, mulching and protective measures; Interior landscaping areas hatched and /or shaded and labeled and interior landscape coverage, expressing in both square feet and percentage covered; Conditions of a previous development approval (e.g. conditions imposed by the Community Development Board); Irrigation notes. ❑ REDUCED COLOR LANDSCAPE PLAN to scale (8' /2X 11); ❑ COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM application, as applicable. Landscape associated with the Comprehensive Landscape Program shall exceed minimum Code requirements to offset the areas where minimum Code will not be met. I. BUILDING ELEVATION PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4- 202.A.23) ABUILDING ELEVATION DRAWINGS —with the following information: All sides of all buildings Dimensioned Colors (provide one full sized set of colored elevations) Materials ❑ REDUCED BUILDING ELEVATIONS — same as above to scale on 8 % X 11 J. SIGNAGE: (Division 19. SIGNS / Section 3 -1806) ❑ All EXISTING freestanding and attached signs; Provide photographs and dimensions (area, height, etc.), indicate whether they will be removed or to remain. All PROPOSED freestanding and attached signs; Provide details including location, size, height, colors, materials and drawing; freestanding signs shall include the street address (numerals) ❑ Comprehensive Sign Program application, as applicable (separate application and fee required) ❑ Reduced signage proposal (8 X 11) (color), if submitting Comprehensive Sign Program application. i 20T 1 C: \Documents and Settings \nghovaee \Local Settings \Temporary InterrietW } Files \Content.IE5 \G9AJ8L2N\ Comprehensive %201nfill %20Project %20 %28FLD %29 %202008 %2007- 11-[ °1,] dbc ' Page 6 of 8 DEVE4-OI?rv- Ct `f' OF CLEa F1WAY_ER • C� K. TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY: (Section 4- 202.A.13 and 4- 801.C) ❑ Include if required by the Traffic Operations Manager or his /her designee or if the proposed development: ■ Will degrade the acceptable level of service for any roadway as adopted in the Comprehensive Plan. ■ Will generate 100 or more new vehicle directional trips per hour and /or 1000 or more new vehicle trips per day. ■ Will affect a nearby roadway segment and /or intersection with five (5) reportable accidents within the prior twelve (12) month period or that is on the City's annual list of most hazardous intersections. Trip generation shall be based on the most recent edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineer's (ITE) Trip General Manual. The Traffic Impact Study must be prepared in accordance with a " Scoping Meeting" held with the Traffic Operations Manager and the Planning Department's Development Review Manager or their designee (727- 562 -4750) Refer to Section 4 -801 C of the Community Development Code for exceptions to this requirement. XAcknowledgement of traffic impact study requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following): Traffic Impact Study is included. The study must include a summary table of pre- and post - development levels of service for all roadway legs and each turning movement at all intersections identified in the Scoping Meeting. XTraffic Impact Study is not required. CAUTION — IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 562- 4750. L. FIRE FLOW CALCULATIONS/ WATER STUDY: Provide Fire Flow Calculations. Water Study by a FIRE PROTECTION ENGINEER to assure an adequate water supply is available and to determine if any upgrades are required by the developer due to the impact of this project. The water supply must be able to support the needs of any required fire sprinkler, standpipe and /or fire pump. If a fire pump is required the water supply must be able to supply 150% of its rated capacity. Compliance with the 2004 Florida Fire Prevention Code to include NFPA 13, MFPA 14, NFPA 20, NFPA 291, and MFPA 1142 (Annex H) is required. Acknowledgement of fire flow calculations /water study requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following)'^ --" Fire Flow CalculationsNVater Study is included. , Fire Flow Calculations/Water Study is not required. i i1 FEB J 2 20110 CAUTION — IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT E-OR A FIRE FLOW _ CALCULATIONS/ WATER STUDY AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST, BE I RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR." �.. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Fire Prevention Department at (727) 562 -4334. M. SIGNATURE: I, the undersigned, acknowledge that all representations made in this application are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge and authorize City representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application. Signature of property owner or representative STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PIN S Sworn Jo anj subscribed before me this - day of A.D. 20_ o to me and /or by IN V bo is personally known has produced as identification.e is Notary public, My commission a_A V-1 Pv - C: \Documents and Settings \nghovaee \Local Settings \Temporary Internet Files \Content.IE5 \G9AJ8L2N\ Comprehensive %201nfill %20Project %20 %28FLD %29 %202008 %2007 -11 [1 ].doc Page 7 of 8 • • N. AFFIDAVIT TO AUTHORIZE AGENT: �. 1. Provide names of all property owners on deed full names: /- -PRINT 2. That (1 am /we are) the owner(s) and record title holder(s) of the following described property (address or general location): 3. That this property constitutes the property for which a request for a: (describe request) 4. That the undersigned (has /have) appointed and (does /do) appoint: 1 f C ^r i lf�. _tf 9 as (his /their) agent(s) to execute any petitions or other documents necessary to affect such petition; 5. That this affidavit has been executed to induce the City of Clearwater, Florida to consider and act on the above described property; 6. That site visits to the property are necessary by City representatives in order to process this application and the owner authorizes City representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application; 7. That (1 /we), t" undersigned authority, hereby certify that the fforeoing is true and correct. Property Owner Property Owner Property Owner Property Owner STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS Before me the undersigned, an officer duly commissioned by the laws of the State of Florida, on this O day of y personally appeared who having been first duly sworn Deposes and says that he /she fully understands the contents of the affidavit that he /she signed. NOTATI PUBLIC -STATE OF FLOP -MA A Ram A. GOel Commission # DD531438 Notary Public Public Signature Expires: MAY 03, 20 i0 Notary Seal /Stanip)nded Thru Atlantic Bonding Co., Inc. My Commission Expires: O 0.� / Z:\2008 AutoCAD Projects\ray\Com pre he nsive Infill Project (FLD) 2008 07 -1 Page 8 of 8 E 112010 doc CITY OF CLEAFiWAT R a 1 4 F k cr- M i c�9 1t c J RDA IU csr La 1a�P2 eA 6 k "y F# :7274470427 Dec. 02 2009 09:00 P2 Planning Department 100 South Myrtle Avenue C19arW6terr Florida 33794 Telephone: 727 - 5624567 Fax- 727-5624855 ! APPUCATION p SUBMIT ORIQINAL � CI SUBMIT COPIES llstapled AppLICATION - Plans and piilation are aquired t be Collated, ed Into sets CASE NUMBER: _... . RECEIVED BY (Staff lrotlats): DATE RECEI 'AD: * NOTE: A TOTAL OF 16 SETS OF THIS APPLICATION AND ALL SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION 18 REQUIRED TO BE SUBMITTED IN CONJUNCTION WITH A COMPLETE LEVEL ONE OR LEVEL TWO APPLICATION. COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM (Revised 03129/2004) `PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT' APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION: (Co(le Section 4- 202.A) APPLICANT NAME: ���-% �,(�_�_;�1_CS��;X1A.C+- t!{...�. ,: -��-.. - - � �•=% MAILING ADDRESS: PHONE NUMBER: /�,.,..�,.. _..„ CELL NUMBER: PROPERTY OWNERIS): SO��, to�r r C List ALL ownors on tM deed - °,- .... -- _- , .,......._.. AGENT NAME: •1 �(!�a,,.._�C�LiSkrA -_s -Q ?� -----_...____ _._.. MAILING ADDRESS: PHONE NUMBER: _ -. •— _-- -•_-•_ FAX NUMBER: -42 71- 66 9 !9 104, CELL NUMBER: 2�� .tE _..:��k �U...._ .._. EMAIL ADDRESS: _5 1 �. $ ti2� •LAlpn....- - --_ PaY'Ce_ Il,�t'09/zT / 195-5 31:1 /000 /0/00 1. ARCHITECTURAL THEME: a. The landscaping In a Comprehensive Landscape Program "if be designed as a part of the architectural theme of the principal buildings proposed or developed on the parcel proposed for the development. OR b. The design, Character, location andfor materials of the landscape treatment proposed In the Comprehensive Landscape Program shall be demonstrably more attractive than landscaping otherwise permitted on the parcel proposed for development under the minimum landscape Jt�D t-ats _•. S:nanning OePadmentWppllcation FormsldevaMArnent i 9 w12= AWMS11COmpreltenaive Landscape Program 2006.doc [ T C?iriEPJT SERVICES �''� a•,� ®EST s CL — In -A --,, FROM :RUSSEL/REBECK FAX N0. :7274470427 �ec. 02 2009 09:03PM P1 L1014TING; Any lighting proposed as a part of a Comprehensive landscape Program is automatically wntrolled so that the lighting is turned off when the business is closed, 3. COMMUNITY CHARACTER: The landscape treatment proposed m wet Comprehensive Landscape Program Wit enhance the 00 1711004 4 t�taracter of the City of C1earwater, . 1 _ It I �- Al . a:.. .nn 16,r ,[i+IP Lob' hx t t►11I+rKt f1 �1dA G 4. PROPERTY VALUES: The landscape treatment proposed in the Comprehensive Landscape Program Wit have a beneficial impact on the value Of the property in the osed immediate vicinity of the parcel prop for development.. - A _ i _ ...o tr ., e� . -11141 I� 4 if 4• 5. SPECIAL AREA OR SCENIC CORRIDOR PLAN: The landscape treatment proposed in the Comprehensive Landscape Program is consistent with arty special area or scenic corridor plan which the City of Clearwater has prepared and adopted for the area In whicli the parcel proposed for development is located. THE LANDSCAPING REQUIREMENTS OF ARTICLE 3, DIVISION 12 MAY BE WAIVED OR MODIFIED AS A PART OF A LEVEL. ONE OR LEVEL TWO APPLICATION, AS THE CASE MAY BE. IF T14E APPLICATION FOR DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL INCLUDES A COMPREHENSIVE ES 114E LANDSCAPE PROGRAM, HI VHS MAYBE NEC S5AROY TO SUPPLEMENT THE tINFORMA�TION PROVIDED ON THIS WORKSHEET. ELEVATIONS. -- 4'_ l SIGNATURE: 1, the undersigned. acknowledge that all representations made in this application are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge and authorize City 1`815resentatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application. . QK . . Signature -of property owner or representative STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINEL SIB 1 { Sworn to and ubscribed before me this day of A.D. 20 to me and/or by. ry who i6 personally known has al produced r a5 identification.'�� i�u. .5_ c`, " r. 1 i 0 Lru _Notary Public My commission pi!e , 1.ires: MAY O i 20�� ega�.Th.i ' a S:1Plannr'ng �P ment{gpprtcaflon Formstdeveiopment rev►ewt2006 FormslComprehensive Landscape Program 2006. doe Page 2 of 2 cv 4 V4 LJ 0 0 The minimum landscape requirements can't be met in certain areas. The building is existing and therefore can not be relocated. The parking lot meets minimal code, therefore no additional landscape space can be created by deleting a parking space. The parcel itself is small, leaving no room for additional planting once the minimum requirements are met for building. Any remaining areas on this parcel that have not been designated for building has been designated for landscaping with only the retention area sodded., Reductions The landscape requirements for the building facade north, facing Marshall Street is 4' wide instead of the required 5'. The north landscape buffer is 4.96' instead of 10' in certain areas. In other areas it meets the 10' requirement. The south landscape buffer is 0' instead of 5' in certain areas. In other areas it meets the 10' requirement. The east landscape buffer is A' to existing building. The remaining buffer is 5' as required. The west landscape buffer meets the 10' buffer requirement. Provided On the north side perimeter, four trees are required but due to visibility triangles, two ligustrum trees are proposed. A 10' landscape buffer is required. A 4.96' landscape buffer area is proposed with the required perimeter hedge being viburnum suspensum. The remaining space is landscaped with miscellaneous ground cover. On the south side perimeter four trees are required along with a 5' landscape buffer area. The existing building and proposed parking lot occupy part of the perimeter. The remaining area is landscaped with viburnum suspensum and Indian hawthome. Due to lack of space the four required trees have been planted along the west perimeter. On the west side perimeter one tree is required, five bald cypress trees are proposed. Four of the bald cypress are to be credited to the south side perimeter requirements. A 10' landscape buffer is required and provided. A viburnum suspensum hedge is proposed for the perimeter hedge. The retention pond is sodded with bahia sod since no shrubs are recommended for this area. The outer perimeter is landscaped with Indian hawthome to provide low landscaping plus visibility for the sign in the south west comer of property. On the east side perimeter one tree is required, one crape myrtle is proposed. A 5' landscape buffer is required and provided partly along the east side, with a vibumum suspensum hedge proposed for the perimeter hedge with miscellaneous shrubs planted in the remaining space. The existing building occupies the remaining space. 100% of the building facade with a minimum of 5' width landscape area is required along the front of the building facing north. 4' is provided. A viburnum suspensum hedge has been proposed to be planted along the facade with ground cover planted in the remaining space. Two accent trees are required along the front of building also. Six (three pahn trees equal one accent tree) sabal palm trees have been proposed to meet this requirement. There are no requirements for the parking lot due to the size being under 4000 s.f. To make up the lack of landscaping along the south perimeter and also the lack of two trees for the north perimeter, additional landscaping has been added in the interior, between the parking lot to the west and the building. Two little gem magnolia trees, (to be applied for credit for the north perimeter) have been proposed along with miscellaneous shrubs in this area. There is no sod proposed in this area. 4 .�� � r N t C. j G= c+"y CD W �rtit� e`t �s +� L� �j p =_ r. LRSJ ti iu U .. 0, • E RE AND U S A jE A RE MENT W 0,Sk R- b V "l � S� P Y This contract made this2TAidaY of '�Q" 2009 by 1504 Garden, INC., Florida 1504 N corporation, the owner of 503 Marshall Streetfl150he �Ner refe e Harrison, Garden Ave., Clearwater, Pineelas County, Florida, Owner /grantor" and "User /grantee ": The owner/grantor grants to User /grantee access, egress and usage of Waste e property located at 1504 N. Garden Ave., Clearwater, Pinellas County, dum P stet on th Florida, More legally described as: LEGAL DESCRIPTION: PARCEL 1: JOGETHER LOTS 5, 6, AND 7 OF E.A. MARSHALL'S SUBDIVISION VACATED) LYING WITH THE EASTERLY 5 FEET OF THE ALLEY (N 17 Og, ACCORDING RECORDS R PLAT RECORDED A IN PLAT SAID K 7, PAGE PLAT UNTY WAS HII,LSBOROUGH COUNTY, FLORIDA, OF WI�C,T PO�R,T.ION OF LOTS 5, 6, FORMERLY A PART' LESS AND EXCEPT AND 7, LYING EASTERLY OF THE WEST RIGHT -OF -WAY OF GARDEN AVENUE. TOGTHER WITH THE FOLLOWING; ; OMT MOF LESLE E SUBDIV SION INTERSECTION OF NORTH BOUNDARY AS RECORDED ON FEBRUARY 4, 1884, IN DEED BOOK � PAGE F WICH F THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF HII,SSBOROUGH COUNTY, WITH FL _ "PINELLAS COUNTY WAS FORMERLY A PART; E'N'I'LY OCCUPIED; THENCE WAY LINE OF GARDEN AVENUE AS IT IS PRE NORTH 81' 14'34" WEST, (BASIS OF BEARINGS of ASSUMED) 9 FEET; ALONG THE THENCE NORTH BOUNDARY OF SAID LOT 3, A DISTANCE SOUTH 06.04'06" WEST, ALONG THE SOUTHERLY EXTENSION OF THE CENTERLINE OF A VACATED 10 FOOT ALLEY L " �L 'SSUBDIVIISION,6AS AND 7 AND EAST OF LOTS 8, 9, AND 10, E. A. MARS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 7; PAGE 17 OF THE PUBLIC O PLAS Q WAS HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY, FLORID 15.00 FEET FORMERLY A PART; 15.02 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 8B1o14'D4""EE�OF SAID LOT 3, SOUTHERLY OF AND PARALLEL TO NORTH 1' NORTH 7'36" EAST, ALONG THE A DISTANCE OF 70.62 FE WEST RIGHT -OF -WAY LINE OF GARDEN AVENUE, 15.06 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. o0Z :m NimZ ;a* t°o 0 r.- �0 7WCS0A ocn m tZ-4 m noo -� °TNr- U o 2P3—!0- z � - 3 0 Z"mDC PO co Ch � N A O, ORIGINAL RECT JUG � 1 11 2009 PLANNING • COUNTY OF PINELLAS STATE OF FLORIDA • 1504 GARDEN, INC. .444- President Owner /grantor and User /grantee, /- 2-7-0 7 Before me this day personally appeared HASHIM SULLIAMAN, as president of 1504 GARDEN, INC. who is personally known to me to be the person described herein, or who has provided Florida ID as identification, and who executed the foregoing, and acknowledged that he /she executed same of his/her own free act and deed, for the purposes therein. I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my seal, this )7th day of 200c% '" PY LOWIU.A UPSCOM9 tv4Y COMMISSION # DO 743262 JUN 10 2009 SONEY FM LLC 1743 Dorchester Rd Clearwater, FL 33764 soneyfmllcna,hotmail.com Ph: (727) 420 — 4796 Fax: (727) 524 — 7599 To Traffic Operations Division City of Clearwater 100 S Myrtle Ave Clearwater, FL 33756 Ph: (727) 562 —4567 Fax: (727) 562 — 4865 SUBJECT: Request for approval of reduced distance of proposed driveway from the existing intersection. Ref: Community Development Code Section 3 —103B. C, Section 3 — 102.C.3 Dear Sir This letter is to request for approval of reduced distance of proposed driveway from the existing intersection. The proposed distance from the existing intersection of N. Fort Harrison Ave. and Marshall St. is 60' 6 ". This is the most suitable location for the access /driveway proposed for this project. No other cost effective alternate location is feasible. We believe that the proposed location will not cause any undue traffic condition on either N. Fort Harrison Ave. or Marshall St. Hence we request for approval of reduced distance of proposed driveway from the existing intersection. questions please feel free to call the undersigned. m A:ael cy p P,4131, j wee �m (J FM• LLC -' - 174 tq Rd;� Clear' —33764 OR101 RE C'S VW, FEB 0 4 2000 CITY 0r ' CR LEGAL DESCRIPTION: ER CD LJ N Q- Y`•s LOT 10 OF E.A. MARSHALL'S SUBDIVISION, ACCORDING TO THE U F-ov?4 \/a7 MAP OR PLAT THEREOF AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 7, PAGE 17, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY, FLORIDA, OF WHICH PINELLAS COUNTY WAS FORMERLY A PART. AND /--- THE NORTH 50.15 FEET OF THE WEST 5 FEET OF A CERTAIN VACATED 10 FOOT ALLEY RUNNING ALONG THE EAST LINE OF LOT 10 OF E.A. MARSHALL'S SUBDIVISION, ACCORDING TO MAP OR PLAT THEREOF AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 7, PAGE 17, 111 X� 1$ SH AR �`I L� OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY, FLORIDA, (, 0 Tn OF WHICH PINELLAS COUNTY WAS FORMERLY A PART. �C/ 81p ` app __�- 2�k S�7TEE7- $, 8 rho; 8 k5 2p 3' AS AL 7' g p / 5 .01 2$ 5' 6g 66 h0 IP.K. CNC.14" oaKry X k CDNC WAS p5 PP r 72 ° 0X.50 A ^ �p p5X g ,%'© AV$ g,Lk o; 1�O 325, py o _ _3o�x 149 95'- g1 ry 12" OAK a 13 OAK 17 dA TBM cc \ p� ONE STOR .f `b�; 68 ELEV.= 31.0 .01 MA SOLAR Y ry 12 1, g CONCRETE FIR 1/2 �p� I PP 4' CONC. WALK •� �v o 1p °, a"APARTMEI�1r� g,�� k PARKING / (0 12" OAK �0 BUILDING X X01 CONC. LANTFRS 1 �z 1505A F \ ` 5 ". I( 0 0� � p �, � � _ x � 6g p • v 13" OAK 70 0 O # 1505L7 �! 19 3• N �o FINISH FLOOR LOT f0 "1 2' MAS. WALL ni ELEV.= 33.21 ' WOOD g� �` TWO S TOR Y 6 0' 'Q^ J0• (TYP.) 325, 7EPS X �+ ^` J TBM ,#1 TOP F W � FIR 1/2° ^ g� � 15c 1 16" PALM ry MAS BUILDING � I ELEV. _ .26' / / 1 O 503 i X ill 1 g9 N ��_ BOTTOM FINISH FLOOR ELEV. = 31.07' c 1 ` ' 9( • REVISED SURVEY ON 9106102. ADDED TOPOGRAPHIC ELEVATIONS AND TREE LOCARON. :P0 7%570 ` / 9 S/• O.2 (/�-) FIR 5 18 °IJ LOT 9 / NOT INCLUDED CERTIFIED TO: � 1 � 1504 GARDEN INC. ALDAY- DONALSON 77TLE AGENCIES OF AMERICA, INC. STEWART TITLE GUARANTY COMPANY 2 O Z. SMITH �G,QI'El'pRs (V W J U c BEARINGS ARBi'sE@TNE SOUTH LOT LINE OF LOT 10 A',, "S 79 g " "�;pi5a�f �a �� 9. t. .,.• 'w Q`�. • a • , PROPERTY SHOWN HEREON APPEARS TO BE LOCATED IN FLOOD ZONE C PER L_ E G E: BEARINGS ARBi'sE@TNE SOUTH LOT LINE OF LOT 10 A',, "S 79 g " "�;pi5a�f �� 9. t. .,.• 'w Q`�. • a • , PROPERTY SHOWN HEREON APPEARS TO BE LOCATED IN FLOOD ZONE C PER L_ E G E: A.P.O. ASPH. B.M. = �C) = O.R.B. = = A PORTION OF O/H = = ASPHALT PG. = BENCHMARK P.C.P. = CALCULATED ' R.M. = OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK OVERHEAD WIRE PAGE PERMANENT CONTROL POINT PERMANENT REFRENCE MONUMENT •�� y ;! G 1aZ. • • - % G% F.LR.M. NO. 125096 0008 D DATED 8119191 THIS SURVEYOR MAKES NO GUARANTEES AS TO THE ACCURACY OF THE ABOVE INFORMATION, LOCAL F.E.M.A. AGENT SHOULD BE CONTACTED FOR VER/F1CA77ON •: Z� SMl,TN 4DtjTE s' NO UNDERGROUND UTILITIES, UNDERGROUND ENCRrJAC':.'NTS OR BUILDING R SION� S YO FOUNDA77ONS WERE MEASURED OR LOCATED AS FART THIS SURVEY. TREES AND C.L.F. = CONC. CHAIN LINK FENCE = CONCRETE = j = PLAT BOOK PLAT DATA Ofs'J ®�l 74ET(jSTR N 526 OTl IR141A SHRUBS WERE NOT LOCATED UNLESS OTHERWISE .aHOW,.: COV. = (D) = COVERED DESCRIPTION r.O.B. = P.O.C. = POINT OF BEGINNING POINT OF COMMENCEMENT aIj> WOUT THE 4 THIS SURVEY WAS CONDUCTED WITHOUT THE SENERT OF AN ABSTRACT OF TITLE, 1GNA A I$E® EAk'.;OF,`A 1 THEREFORE THERE MAY BE OTHER EASEMENTS, RIGHTS OF WAY, SETBACK LINES, D.B. F_L. - DEED BOOK ELEVATION P.C. P.R.C. POINT OF f URVATURE POINT OF REVERSE CURVE FLOR /D� �l2'ED - S(I{�►VEYQg; s: �� ¢�, C1� AGREEMENTS, RESERVAT7ONS, RESTRICTIONS OR OTHER IILAR MATTERS OF PUBLIC ENC. = ENCROACHMENT P.T. — POINT OF TANGENCY .^ MAPPER ire Jt • f V2� Q \tom _ //,^, V/ RECORD, NOT SHOWN HEREON. ESMT. = EASEMENT P.F'. = POWER POLE ` d 1 UCENSEC BUSINE�SFS� Eli. 6962., fjF, v/ �/ UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, DISTANCES SHOWN HEREON REFER TO PLAT AND FIELD (F) = F.F. = FIELD MEASUREMENT FINISHED FLOOR RES. = R/W = RESIDENT RIGHT OF WAY 1406 W. LINEBAUGH AVENUE �(� V MEASUREMENT F.C.M. = FOUND CONCRETE MONUMENT S.I.R. = SET IRON ROD LB 6962 TAMPA FLORIDA .33612 E �/ THIS CERTIFIES THAT THIS SURVEY WAS MADE UNDER MY SUPER WSICN AND MEETS F.I.P. = FOUND IRON PIPE S. D. = SET DISK LB BENCH TEMPORARY BENCH MARK PHONE (813)935 -1960 FAX (813) 933 -9446 DA V/p L. SMI Ti7 PROFESSIONAL SURVEYORS & MAPPERS INC. APPLICABLE MINIMUM TECHNICAL STANDARDS SET FOR7H IN CHAPTER 61G17 =6 FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE PURSUANT TO SECT70N 472.027 FLORIDA STATUS F.P.K. MAS. = FOUND PARKER -KALON NAIL MASONRY Np = W.C. -- WITNESS CORNER JOB N0.0209 -02.3 RECD DATE:11 /19/01 co—p 01'11 -201 p NGVD = NATIONAL GEODETIC VERTICAL DATUM W.F. — WOOD FENCE LEGAL DESCRIPTION PARCEL 1: LOT 10 OF EA MARSHALL'S SUBDIVISION. ACCORDING TO THE "" OR PLAT THEREOF AS RECORDED IN PUT BOOK 7, PAGE 17, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY, FLORIGA, OF WHICH PINELLAS COUNTY WAS FORMERLY A PART. AND THE NORTH 50.15 FT. OF THE WEST 5 FT, OF A CERTAIN VACATED 10 FOOT ALLEY RUNNING ALONG THE EAST UNE OF LOT 10 OF EA MARSHALL'S SUBDIVISION, ACCORDING TO MAP OR PLAT THEREOF AS RECORDED IN PUT BOOK 7, PACE 17, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY, FLORIDA, OF WHICH PINE COUNTY WAS FORMERLY A PART. FLOOD ZONE INFORMATION THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY APPEARS TO UE WITHIN ZONE C PER FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP 115088 X MAP REVISED: 00/19/91 DAVVO ISMITH, PLS PROVIDED BY A SIGNED R SEALED SURVEY BY: DATED: 03/13/05 SECTION I T811VNSHIP S, RANGQ9 E 15 CITY OF CLEARWATER PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA CD 1W C" N J LJL- LL SITE DATA msTlIVG(E) PROPOSED (?) REQUIRED __ CYbArtJBRCl1l ORVBML LGLOIDAR.eAt USAGE MGZTBwABLYR�FIVIUL RBgR(URODNBPL) ARTnmvr(Aw 1 LOTAREA: ZTA)4F. 61JACRD 0.18ACR&S JWSP.- 10.a83P. AeN BBN�T,• ,1D� ➢�A�4 - �J��T4P�A�e UBAPIO A[✓B: (4F.d %GFGRORD Ob' 1 J,sasF. LJJJ.,4F..RY u..emw - OROSTF /.00RAIe.4 (4P.).' FA.R: f,.1114F. aa4 Oy �I¢OM: Jr 48,BALICE BmE JvAeN ecoG.®orm v- ro➢GPPAR1ear mu- PPwTRroF Jr- roro ➢rowae va•- nATROOP PAVBOVP]BCTR�R VBBARRL lvv 1 I,JU 9P. J.f9s4P. — B.BRRVIOU440E.ACBRA— 4RJ OPEN ACE (4F e % a+GRns srtal 1NeBP. 4Lr.% LO40 SP. PARKINOPgTINSWOR LAMWCAPMO (%OPVUA) ARA IVONB P.fFRdVP IO 1 PARA7NOCALMa7TON4: 1�A�PBR19TO4P.OFOFA. PORRBI' 4PA� ➢bRA➢ARfAPRYTON3BC1]NBPGCORJ+I O(aF- J bPACBS REQO�I88L1M14GP8BT% PPRRmtR]FONFBR lROVIDA•O ➢ARAINO. LEGEND Isr. EU-T.N DIST. CONTOUR -- - - - - -- 'O - - - - -- NEW ELEVATION +10.00 NEW CONTOUR Diu. STORM SEWER - - - - - -- NEW STORM SEWER - - - - - - - NEW UNDERDRAIN .................... Diu. SW. SEWER NEW SAN. SEWER •1 ......... ���• EXIST. WATER SERVICE -- - -- NEN WATER SERVICE ............••••. NEW INLET NEW SAN. LIANHOLE • NEW CLEAN- DUT(C.O.) ....... ffi. PL' NEW BUILDING AREA NEW ASPHALT NEW CONCRETE TEVP. SILT WRIER POINT OF CONNECRON OF NEW UNUTV TO EXIST. M METER B.F.P.0. BACK ON PREVENTON DEVICE FNA Fl RE HYDRANT ASSEMBLY E.O.C. FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTION T.B.O. TEMPDRARY BLOW -OFF T.- TAP AND VALVE C in CIVIL SITE DATA C 217 SITE PLAN C 317 DEMOLITION PLAN C 417 ELEVATIONS C 5/7 LANDSCAPE PLAN C 6/7 LANpSCJEWE DETAILS C 717 COLOR ELEVATIONS ;�P.•GENSF •. A • • 3� rZ • aiu c ¢ neQr DT. - J C) I J�C)ED :5't Ld 0, N J % NOTE, CONCERNING NEW CURBS xox TsTrnc 4YMTE 3e NEW S/W FULL LENGTH CURB TO MEET CITY e• WsonRi on 5� DIPORTANT JOB NOTES / REFERENCES (, AND STATE AND FOOT GUIDELINES pR e'f0 RcNISYFR TOP Di 90YYER 1. Share dumpeter on the adjacent CONTRACTOR DOING THIS WORK TO V� SUBMIT PLANS AND BE APPROVED BY -F2%- e• m 9-D e• Property (also owned by the 0 CITY PLANS EXAMINER AND ENGINEER applicant) through appropriate 4A; PRIOR TO FABRICATION. " "" agreements with the city. Dumpster 70'4 R °• enclosure shall be upgraded FlRE HYDRANT /a ( IXISTING) pgr dad to City 15' RCP FROM CONTROL STRUCTURE DE TO EXISTING 6' WATER LINE Ya, 4• CK = specifications index 701 (wooden). AT EL 29.75' TO EXISTING - I•_e• Co1c aIa 2. Traffic impact fees to be STORMWATER MANHOLE AT EL 29.0' - -- .� a aRAPLOC 9CAId determined and paid prior to C.O. _ - _ emmY of slDru .... I o e o 20 _ _ 82.8' -' 9. All outdoor lighting fixtures shall tg 20'x20' SIGHT �. 109'.53 ,se.,, be solely on the building. VISIBILITY _-�_� _ ,r.sn TRIANGLE - y'j ..- 4. Si h must include the address of FOR R.O.W. I _�__ _ � _ � �- _- � � � e building. NEW 6 ''E't -6_C45 MODIFIED TYPE "D" J 1 E _'�- CONTROL STRUC IURE 5. All applicable building permits will �. ELECT p0 - CUR - - 6' µAS .18 be obtained for all work performed 6 S' '�•�_ ~� EX /ST /N _ end receive all final Inspections� • _ _ G _ ` _ _ - _ _ prior a the issuance sec of f C.O. � ry91A 50 'r°kmw�"e 4.63' SL71ER 0 � � y - Y��SAN 8. The usage of the second floor Monument ry 1 99' �Q"/SI/NG AS - will be limited to apartments. / 6' High Slgn 24. 5 -STORM All asphalt on site except perimeter �O/ I1' ryg. Pfb AL. 7g70 4 � ___ __1\[_',�iT _ - sidewalks to be removed. 9 ` 5.650' ENEµ. 1¢995' A- �- 9 _ 8. Elevator is not required as per = SiD.�K �� 'p y?� 20.3 ASP - __ FL building code section 11 -4.1.9 T � exception (1). X p; 20'x20' Q 15 zT SECT POLE-• ` 9. Sidewalks and sidewalk ramps ar Z SIBWTY 9 O X o 2' 4' CONC µ. Txi� per City of Clearwater Index 1109, p 7 A.D.A. Truncated domes per D.O.T. f 7743 / M 91 �b V. ! .8 S`4 l3g'' 3, 4' Index 1304 an construction plane. X 0� 10. Use standard pre -paimed disabled , 3 U 4' ,wwz o perking sign on 1/8" thick abeet Ol&y b r.o•0 9, 6" PVC PIPE 5' �� �4N SCAPE' 18.0' tl =' w aluminum. mount to 2: HD Galy. ® 0.2% SLOPE 0' i ' / ya $moo wa z std. wt. steel pipe. mount is 8"X / " R EXT. NEW WALL - :yam ° 2' -8" concrete mass. Finish to of NEW N.C. 0.4 C mesa level with Blight raised wepeh R SIGN 31'x19.3' % 2' MA ALL - _ `7 W EXISTING approximatley 1/2" above level of Ig 43, "tt Q o EXISTING TWO STORY DUMPSTE Turf /Sod. 0 ,4 V n� MAS. BUILDING f/503 (SE t) M19 S 7970 -Ty 9 5' O 1st. RETAIL FL. =1,610 S.F. i 48'1 Il. Standard hendicaped perking 6' CURB E 15)0 0.5 6506 2nd. APL FL -1,758 S.F. ^ I �y stall and sign details to conform to 2' S; art 3, div 14, sec 3 -1408, page 26.4' _ / .p8 - - X soTTav Flwsl FLOLw M :2 F, 3 -81 -2 of the city of clearwater land ASSUFfED ELEM- Jt07' A development regulation. 61.01' BASE EL 509 _� - - _ 5876' i W 10 "e1 12. All sigaage (include handicapped) to obtained to upgrade perking on the H.C. RAMP TO BE 1 T,2 y meet city requirements per index 119 �-- VARIES --I 96.34' 1580• FLUSHED WITH PAI�tZfENT ' - 9 Handicap ramp from stall to 1 sidewalk to meet city requirements PER F.D.O.T. INDEX )/304. 1.92' -y per index 109. stall painting to meet 50 -YEAR EVENT RETENTION POND 1 city requirements. 30' BOTTOM 15.0' % 2.0' O EL 28.75, 1.0� .x+n�,...ti.,.„....�.,.. «.ne 13. All utilities are existing at the TOP 79.0' % 14.0' O EL 29.75' 60.66' d.,""wK S,. �'T`*,,,r„""'�^"„d a0 n0 new conetrucU. is requi t 2' RETAINING WALL RETENTION POND CROSS SECTION N.r.S t FTP - 25 1- 1/2%1 kp R yi,G sssysT� �„ TRUNCATED DOME fiADKGUROUND t /r' WDF PER F. D. O. T: INDEX 304 ii�� �r k +i izT2r�x"Eiva 7A' AND SYMBOL R k'X ;Vjq p�zre^ RCeM SIGLLSPECIFICATIONS ,y$t,'^�_piY13 �y'iR �' ' 1. 19•,12' LOGO SIGN Y hHhh tY i _t PARKING BY a4iui �;�ry MtIRE DISABLED 2. 2 SIGN GEMS SHEETING � l +l��~;� J.P 03 03 201 P. 02/21/201 BACKGROUND PERMIT 11 SERIES 'C' REFLECTIVE SHEETING y l.yl y 2 J.P. 01/2 1 20R 3. IERTEAS t0 BE '$'m"� }1'^ FLUSH CURB ONLY 1/2' aIACK 1• HIGH SERIES •C' "i�SXS bSlYfx'CdY ' R O9 11 200 Ra nwND a .N IYaaeal w em n Na avu w ENY E RQaR. w n< -.5' � 4. SIGN TO BE MADE OF S 0 N E Y F M L L C R V. DESCRIP ON a 69 E °1°x"m'smNMOmlaia`N ` xrvME aaEa"°" $255 FINE N.UMINUM Yara lye ala5tr t'�4 E6 # 9746 s;i'lc 16306 DOUNE CT. GARDEN AVENUE COMPLEX BACKGROUND'° 5. POST TO BE MIRE OF a5a . F.S. 318.18 .5* (SEE DETA srEFE (S" °E PER TAMPA, FL 33647 a. SIGNICE PER AOA . .'� �.r � CUENT: HASNIM SULLNMAN DRAWN BY: RC CHECKED BY: RG Dr. Rain A. GOBI, P.E. #47431 vP -u REQUIREMENTS "' CURB PH: 727)420 -4796 PRWECr`REFURB.(2)BUILDINGS SCALE: 1 " -10' cw of lw"�`iN Tn°'""wa mr :1e'm.� HANDICAP RAMP DETAIL ( LarwnoN: f505 Fi. t1ARRI8ON oAte OT112N9 HANDICAP PARKING SIGN DETAIL N.T.S. FAX: (813)972-2846, 593IRARSNALL FlLE Z02 PTtn 1 SHEE N.TS, I DESCRIPOON: SITE PLAN BPNR I I C2 • 0- 1. 9 Q. �MAR 10 2010 D LOP LENT SERVICLSI DEPT C°-'YOFCLEARWW E • _ es2 REMOVE EX. TREES / REMOVE ttie e REMOVE s' EX. CONC. CURB t, ` 9to & WALK REMOVE 1�. ° L `'- - -__ `_ - -- _`8 6 REMOVE EX. CONCRETE PARKING EX. TREES _-SRS 14" OAK `w NC WA K__ 3 -_ T 9y9 _ STRE - Ll 71 �LLLLLLN�45�F 9'Iti ASPyALT LLL X - ?91O O9 L_ p 9 z o LLLLLLLLL fl A bb y L1d.�.�d .LLC_LLLL,— i .. .9. PP 4 CONC WACK 7VLI �L i CO�I EX CON z OAK ��LPLC blLL LLLLLL r`' C Ei �odC L ALL I LLLLL o> TERS- E ALL— s' o se t r3' oa LLLLLL LZd155— LLLLLLLL ( �� !� Ex cork. ho' o�• {LLL - L LLLLLI L REM'gdE _ ` X o LAN IER o ( 2' MAS. WAL(SyJ La' h 4�TT LLL' EX. STEPS REMOVE 'p % '4'4LLLlf1NrSH 71 0 REMAIN 1 -I LL.S- l-L LLL EX. FENCE 3W9= 7 S.F. VY L LL _....�.® GRM•illt SCAIE 5 0 5 10 20 •i 1 +�• L__ I "PALM .p. L -' - EXISTING TWO STORY TO REMAIN 'o h i i---- --�- j^- rL X311` MAS. BUILDING j -I 26.44' REMOVE 299 S 9 ?013 # BOTTOM FINISH ELOOR 5 " (- EX. BUILDING so E 1st 02/ (F,o9 � ELfV.= 31.07" � 'I O ___ e � , j�. SILT FENCE REMOVE ; 9 � N EX. TREES o Lc Z W � EXISTING TREES TO BE REMOVED (7) Q LL (J -u• oAK H (Y }1J' dIN fy L LEGEND ;(e EX. TREES TO BE REMOVED '�� . �� • EX: ING TO BE REMOVED DEMOLITION SITE PLAN. CO +T4pffj'M ;ED G • • 4b [' ; , -••' ` \ Cj r( 5'�'.• 4'r.i� 2 �. P. 01 ZI 3010 FV 1 H.C. OB 14 2009 • SONEY FM LLC REr. OESCR POOH DAE o EB 9746 r 31 # GARDEN AVENUE COMPLEX • 16306 DOUNE CT. �,. ;k• ? �'k : TAMPA, FL 33647 c�w: HASHIMSULLAIMAN oRAwN R: RC CHECNEO B: RG Dr. Ram A.G�I�Er #4743 ; C.�" PH: (727)420 -4796 rRarcT:REFURB.(21BUILDINGS O MSm ra o u siu - 3 La MN: 7505 FT. HARRISON o m- 02117109 (��; FAX: (81 )972 -2846 503 MARSHALL FlENAAE PROJECT SHEE r oescRianoN: DEMOLITION PLAN SPNR C 3TJ • • FF [� EG EL FOYER 58.9' 1ST FLOOR RETAIL 1,610 sf EXISTING PLAN Ale IN - T -c ' LI g; E � a r� A. co Cn LV w _ �g LL_ i 99991. LA h NEW 8' ND NEW SYNQW rvEw sYNTHE110 e• Wp AOM M ADIIAC FACADE ATTACXED m Elps11NG NEW sTNp1ETN: 8' ND TTALHEO m EXISANG AITADE D E. rTAq,EO m E %ISTNG EXI CNU WNL W/ PB04E 8• mu WAU FirAaEOmAT�ipsTWC LWU wALL 2nd FLOOR PLAN cANn(EWA ac roam 1ST FLOOR PLAN cuu wAU w/ Aeo(E a mxm scAlE: ,ro• - ,•_D• sole ,ro' -,•-o- CANTEEYFR aF PROPOSED PLAN REMOVE E%ISIING WNpOWS NEW SYNA R• W) AND PmIACE WTH NEW ALL WNDOWS -App NEW FACADE ADOIP IAON ED m E%1STWG 1'A AND PLANT ONm %i5 PER PVNS DENiRARM i0Y•ER OYm DIMENAONAL p(FS CpUpW: M_ ..M WALL W/ AROE B• oAER , bF VAER \ClAl D EW WNADD As Pm w ANs Y.D ErvmArcE El El X EN..M CANOPY BUR 4GANA GE �. 4 �REPAIR GANRUREPA.T _ C n G UOORw WRODNS A.--sI DOOM NORTH FACADE RI REYOYED 3 AND REPUCE .. NEw EONS ,/9• - -0• REPULED - ApD NEW AS WNDOW A00 NEW AS PER ♦ L`♦ V° • • W W W w • • -� Is • 1� `C • sD • l3 Dr. am�E7474'j 1 E _ z � .A. F M6�E.PVHS /CIE �.5 W1TTE 9wem c • �.. `s�a:a��4.. ...... WEST FACADE AND AINREPA R REPT IT EL ]60 EG FL w w — i D — SOUTH FACADE SCAB ,ro• - 1• -01 PROPOSED BUILDING ANDARE RE E%ISRNG WNpOWs ExA(x WA1 Au NEW WNDOW$ -App NEW AS PER BANS El 1:1 E • A REAAJ�RGI•N,ouREPE•AUNT _ NEw sYNrNEnc A CM EG EL DO.W EAST FACADE SONEY FM LLC RIN.1 DESCRIWION Jay I DAl EB # 9746 GARDEN AVENUE COMPLEX 16306 DOUNE CT. TAMPA, FL 33647 CLEW: HASHIM SULLAIMAN DRAWN BY: RC CHECI(ET PH: (727)420 -4796 PRWECT:REFURB.(2)BUILOINGS scA - 115- •1• -5- 3 EDCATIDN: 1505 FT. HARMON w E ozn2ro5 FAX: (813)972-2846 503 MARSHALL FlLE NPME PRQ ECT WEST FACADE AND AINREPA R REPT IT EL ]60 EG FL w w — i D — SOUTH FACADE SCAB ,ro• - 1• -01 PROPOSED BUILDING ANDARE RE E%ISRNG WNpOWs ExA(x WA1 Au NEW WNDOW$ -App NEW AS PER BANS El 1:1 E • A REAAJ�RGI•N,ouREPE•AUNT _ NEw sYNrNEnc A CM EG EL DO.W EAST FACADE SONEY FM LLC RIN.1 DESCRIWION Jay I DAl EB # 9746 GARDEN AVENUE COMPLEX 16306 DOUNE CT. TAMPA, FL 33647 CLEW: HASHIM SULLAIMAN DRAWN BY: RC CHECI(ET PH: (727)420 -4796 PRWECT:REFURB.(2)BUILOINGS scA - 115- •1• -5- 3 EDCATIDN: 1505 FT. HARMON w E ozn2ro5 FAX: (813)972-2846 503 MARSHALL FlLE NPME PRQ ECT • n J 1 v �y9 4 26 ~ Pi e h q Z o � m % 2' MA ALL t 79 ' A�xNN¢0. .Ym AWl ND�I xxff RY�iOOII�®. v'�mm® aR �x IHE �RpPF�m�,xK FmE me NNnu mnsnr a mt DNe¢¢ m wvnxRir mox. xm RiRr9ea Dr. Ram A. Goel. P.E. ># 47431 aeossm �m ,xc 9e:.�xe aa�itim s� k- 0 W L � 22 VS I2 18 OCE —_ 1 M VS 9 :,. 4.63: RI 13 — — VS — — — — 0{ 9' S ,7920 3 E157`02'(_FJ YO Ppo 22 'y _ - -- _ _ STET A 20.3 ASPyACI �- — SECT pOCE_ ' ; P 4 CO�yC B�AneR o� EXISTING TWO STOJJY AS. BUILDING150 RETAIL FL. =1,61 S.F. APT. FL. =1,768 .F 90T10M FlNISN FLOOR ;1 ��c7=t,;,e,••.••p�- h ^I �_•••�^•�� ^� � ELEV.— J1.07' A ,I- Fn 5676' - wA�+maaL e+muu..s. w,aa�r b wry �.�r�i..w.��r ^P'�_'b m¢.r.xwM. w••u �.an.,,.0 y a. eR+� wx w os spa vrrymx 1w PLANT MATERIAL SCHEDULE ovme�e 00�8�0 Ho* E=lmm� D ©® ®fie oeaa�e RFRRIEIER REOIRREMENTS NORIN 149.95' + JS — (4.2) 4 TREES REQUIRED 10' UWDSCAPAE BUFFER REQUIRED III 149.95' > 35 — (4.2) t TREES REOUIR� 14 .95' S I35 BUFFER REOIUREO EAOT 50.81' + M = (1.15) 1 TREE REQUIRED 5' LANDSEPPAE BUFFER REOIURED WEST 50.81' + 55 = (1.45) 1 TREE REQUIRED 10' AHDSCAPAE BUFFER REQUIRED PAR i UOT u.DDD 9.F. ND LANDSCAPE REQUIRED GENERAL NOTES 1. CONFORMANCE IMPLEMENTATION OF THIS DRAWING sHALL CONFORM TO THE HIGHEST STMDARDS OF THE TRADE AND TO ALL PREYNUNC ORDIRWNCES MD CODES. 2 IRRIGATION: EXECUTION SHALL BE ACWMPMS ED BY THE NSEALLI OF A 1 GO x WER(AP COVERAGE, UNDERGROUND IRRIGA 1 SYSTEM TO THE STANDAIROS AND SPECIFICATIONS OF THE FLORIDA IRRIGATION SOCIETY. 3. SAFETY: DUE CARE AND PROTECTION SHALL BE PRONGED TO PREVENT DAMAGES D IwLRY TO PERSONS, SERVICES, UTILITIES, sRtUCTURES. E2. ON OR ABWT THE STE DURING THE COURSE OF THE WORK. 4. OWNER'S INTERESTS: THE CONTRACTOR SMALL NOT PERFORM ANY WORK THAT -0 HIS KNOWLEDGE OR IN HIS OPINION IS CONTRARY TO THE BEST INTERESTS OF THE OWNER. 5. CLEAN -UP: AT TIIE COMPLETION OF WORN, ALL DEBRIS AND WASTE SHALL BE CLEANED UP AND REMOVED FROM THE SITE 6. ROUGH GRADE THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL FURNSH A ROUGH GRADE TO 43' OF FIXED CONTROL ELEVATIONS. NEE OF DEBTS. CONSTRUCTION WASTE AND WEEDS. TECHNICAL NOTES 1. GRADE: ALL FURNISHED PLANTS SNRLL BE FLORIDA GRADE /1 PER 'GRADES ME STANDARDS FOR NURSERY STOCK' PMTS I & II. FLORIDA DEPT. OF AGR:WLNRE AND PLANTED ACCORDING TO PROPER NURSERY STANDARDS. 2. 500: SOD AS SPECIFIES. SHALL BE CERTIFIED TRUE TO VMIEtt SAND GROWN. LAP STAGGERED IN ROWS, ROLLED AND FER ULD. 3. MULCH: LNDSCARNG SMALL BE TOP DRESSED WITH MMMUM 3' LAYER OF GRAD E 'A' MULCH M ALL PLANTING GETS M'0 AROUND ALL NEE BP SENDING ITS BEFORE LCHInG. UPSTATE W- CONIROt. ARI0. DO NR EE FAU EEP OT PLACE MULCH AGAINST TRUNKS OR SEAS. FINISH LEVEL WIN ADJACENT FINISH CRAZIES. 4. BERMS: 3ERMS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED OF :NOIGENOUS SOIL AND COMPACTED TO 25X . 5. PLANTING: PLANTS SMALL BE SET RUNE. AT THE SAME GRADE AT WHICH THEY HAW CROWN BEST SID' FACING PRIME NLSIBILTY AND THOROUGHLY WATERED IN IO ELIMINATE ANY POCKETS OF AIR. 6. TREES: THEM SHALL BE SET IN A WATER RETENTION DISH 6' IN DEPTH AND EQUAL IN DIAMETER TO THE ROOT GALL AND MULCHED. TREES SHALL BE APPROPRIATELY GUYED AND STAKED AS WARUNUD. ]. MAINTEWWCE ALL MAINTENANCE SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR UNTIL OWNER ACCEPEMCE. 6. PLANT QLWMTIM SHOWN ON WIDSCAPE PUNT AND MATERMLS UST ME OUANTIIES TO BE USED FOR INSTALLATION. B. DURING LAND ALTERATION AND CONSTRUCTION PLDNTIES. T SHALL BE UN- TO REMOVE VECETAION BY GRUBBING OR TO PACE SO'L DEPOSITS. DEBRIS, SOLVENTS, CONSTRUCTION MATERIAL. MACHINERY OR OTHER EQUIPMENT 0-- ANY KIND WITHIN THE DR] ME OF A TREE TO EVAN QN THE SIZE UNLESS OTHERYIISE APPROVED BY THE COUNTY OR CHTY. to ALL PLANTS TO BE FERTILIZED UPON INSTALLATION. 11. SACKFUL ND: W TOP SOIL AND SOIL AMENDMENTS AS PER STANDARD TRADE PRACTICE FOR LOCAL SOL CONDITIONS. 12. INSTALLAo N: TRIM AND SHRUG$ - EXCAVATE PTIS WITH VERTICAL SIDES AND WITH BOTTOM OF EKCAVATON SUGHRY RASED AT CENTER TO ASSIST DRAINAGE EXCAVATE APPROXIMATELY 1 1/2 - 2 TIMES AS WIDE AS BALL DIAMETER AND DEEP ENOUGH TO ALLOW PLACING OF ROOT SAL, ON A SETTING LAYER OF PIINTING SOIL LOOSEN HARD SUBSOIL IN BOTTOM OF EXCAVATION. SET TREES MO SHRUBS PLUMB AND IN CENTER OF PR WON TOP OF BALL RAISED MOVE ADJACENT FINISH GRADES. PUCE A SETTING U.YER OF COMPACTED MKFILL MIX. REMOVE BURLAP AND WIRE GASKETS FROM TOPS OF BAILS AND PARTIALLY FROM SIDES, BUT GO NOT REMOVE NOM UNDER BALLS. GO NOT ME PLANTING STOCK iF BALL 15 CRACKED OR BROKEN BEFORE OR WRING PLANTING OPERATION. RACE BACKIF MOUND BALL IN LAYERS, TMIPING TO SETTLE MKFIiL AND ELIMINATE VOIDS AND MR POCKETS. DISH AND TAMP TOP OF SACKFILL TO FORMA ARCH HIGH MOUND AROUND THE RIM OF THE PT. DO NOT COVER TOP OF ROOT HALL WITH BACKRI IRRIGATION NOTES: 1. IRRICATION DESIGN AND /OR CONSTRUCTION TO BE FURNISHED BY THE LANDSCAPING AND /GPI IRRIGATION CONTRACTOR. IRRIGATION SYSTEM CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WIN THE APPLICABLE SPECIFICATIONS. CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE PRIMAL OF IRRIGATION SYSTEM WIN THE OWNER AND ALL APPLICABLE GOVERNMENT AUTHORITIES, PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION_ 2. IRRIGATION SYSTEMS SHALL UTILIZE LOW VOLUME DESIGN SUCH AS LOW TRIJECTORY HEADS OR SOMER HOSES TO PROVIDE DIRECT APPLICATION AND LOW EVAPORATION AND MUST HAVE A RAIN SENSOR DEVICE OR SWITCH WHICH WILL OVERRIDE THE IRRIGATION MILE OF THE SPRINKLER SYSTEM WHEN AGEOUATE RAINFALL WAS OCCURRED. WATER SUPPLY SMALL BE SPED TO EACH INDMDUAL PLANTER ISLWD. MO IN NO CASE, SHALL MY PLANTED VEGETATION MU BE MORE THAN 50 FEE NOM A WATER SUPPLY HOSE BIBS. SHALLOW WELLS. OPEN SURFACE WATER BODIES. OR RECLAIMED WATER EVIL HE USED (UNLESS UNAVAIIABLE) AS A SOURCE of IRRGATON WATER 3. ENSURE THAT ALL CLNDSCAPEDOO /IMEISSHALL BE FROV.IDEDSM'it NNIRMpOAUiI J 7 f Dr. Ram A. Joel -P E #431 DA R6m1WD�i MEMO O'lTT(CIO5..1, r, xy e • • • IRRIGATION NOTES (CONTINUED): C POP -UP HEADS SHALL BE PROVIDED IN ALL SODDED AND LANOSCMED AREAS, INCLUDING 'ISLANDS', WIN CARE TAKEN IN PLACEMENT OF HEADS TO AWID EXCESSNE BREAKAGE BY AUTOMOBILE AND FOOT TRAFFIC. 5. OWNER SHALL PROVIDE ON -SITE WATER SOURCE (IRRIGATION WELL) FOR USE BY IRRIGATION CONTRACTOR. UNLESS OTHEIT SE SPECIFIED. 6. OWNER SHALL PROVIDE ELECFRCAL HDDK-UP AT A LOCATION PROVIDING ACCESSIBLE SERVICING OF AUTOMATIC TIUER, T. THE CONTRACTOR SNALL PROVIDE ACCESS UNDER ASPHALTED AREAS SUFFICIENT TO RDVDE ACCESS TO ALL ISLANDS AND BEDS FROM WATER SOURCE AND AUTOMANC TIMER MD VALVES- THE SITE CONTRACTOR SMALL COGNDNATE AS NECESSARY WITH ME IRRIGATON CONTRACTOR TO INSURE THAT ALL REOUIREC SLEEVING IS INSTALLED RGR TO ANY PAVING ACTINTES. 8. ANY MD ALL ABOVE GRADE PIPING AND OR OTHER OUTLET OSE BIM ETC) SERVID OTHER THIN POTABLE WATER SMALL BE IN FULL COMPLIANCE MATH SBCCI STANDARD PLUMBING CODE. CHAPTER /6 REFERENCE PAINTING OF PIPE FOR OIffT:RENEroN MCM POTABLE WATER AND LABEUNG OF EACH VALVE MO /DR OUILET NOTING SAME AS NCNPOTABLE WATER. B. CTT /COUNtt WATER MAY NOT BE USED FOR IRR ;CATION WHERE OTHER SOURCES ME REAOILY AVMFBL. 0. All A MATIDN SYSEMS CONNECTED TO THE PUBUC POTABLE WATER SUPPLY SYSTEM SHALL INCLUDE A BACKRDW PH TER AT THE SERVICE CONNECTION. I. ALL SUGAR ON SYSTEMS SMALL BE INSTALLED SO AS -0 MINNIZE SPRAY UPON ANY IMP OM SURFACE. SUCH AS SIDEWALKS AND PAVED AREAS. I. ME ROOT MASS FORM OF EACH TREE PROPOSED NR INSTALLATION SHALL BE BALLED OH BURIAPPED. GLUE ROOT TREES ME NOT ACCEPTABL. ALL NONRODEGRADABLE WRMPMGS WILL BE REMOVED AND BURLAP WILL BE FOLDED DOWN TO ENHANCE WATER ABSORPTION. IF WIRE BASKETS ME USED IN CONJUNCTION WITH BALLED AND BURUPPED TREES THE FRST FEW ROWS OF EACH BASKET SHALL BE REMOVED AT THE TIME OF INSTALLATION. 2. SUPPORTING APPARATUS SHALL BE REMOULD AFTER I COMPLETE GROWING SEASON. ALSO THE FLEXIBLE ATTACHMENTS SHALL BE USED WHERE SUPPORT WIRES ARE WRAPPED MOUND TREE NU /SEAS TO PREVENT CAMBIAL DAMAGE Z. PLOT) HOLES ASSOCIATED WITH PROPOSED TREES MUST DE SLOPED (NOT COMPACTED) AND A MINIMUM OF IB -24 INCHES WIDER THAN THE D-ETER GF THE ROUT BALL TREES SHP11 BE INSTALLED SUCH THAT THE TOP OF THE ROOT MASS IS LEVEL WIN THE SURFACE OF THE PLANTING HOLE. TREES SHOULD BE INSTALLEDi - 5 INCHES ABOVE GRADE ON STIES CONTAINING CLAY. A 2 - 3 INCH DYER OF ORGANIC MULCH MUST ALSO BE PLACED OVER THE ENTIRE SURFACE OF EACH PUNIING HOLE. TO PREVENT FUNGAL INFECTION MULCH SHOULD BE PULLED BACK A FEW INCHES FROM THE BASE OF EACH TREE, 4. IF ON SITE SOIL CONDITIONS ARE SUCH THAT SOIL AMENDMENTS 'NLL BE NECESSARY, THE PLANTING MUST INCLUDE SOIL MIXTURE THROUGHOUT THE ENTIRE SECTION OF EACH PUNTER AREA TO A OEPiH CONSISTENT WITH THE ROOT DEVELOPMENT OF PROPOSED FLINT MATERIAL, 5. PLANTERS ADACENT TO OR WINN VEHICULAR USE AREAS MUST BE CONSTRUCTED SUCH THAT UMEROCK, ASPHALT, CONCRETE OR A OTHER OBSTRUC..ONS OO NOT EXTEND UNDER THE SURFACE IMO THE PRINTING AREAS. 4. THE PRACTICE OF TREE TRUNK WRAPPING AND THE APEUCATION OF PAINTSVTM ONTO PRUNED TREE BRANCHES S NOT RECOMMENDED BY THCC HHERNATIGNAL SOCIETY of ARBORWLTURA: 1. TEASE NOTE TAT THE USE OF FERRLRERS WRING RANT INSTALLATION IS NOT APPROVED. SCIENTIFIC EVIDENCE INDICATES THAT FERTILIZATION (SPECACALL THE APPLICATION OF NEGIO I TO TREES /SXflU85 (THIN THE FIRST G.ROWNG SEASON INHIBITS ROOT �e r urvn sl''' �O Nulcg1F24 �Iraune SMVD �'& NVA74v Ex. ^9 a Wvle. Retenilon O°v° F.am 0.o ulvll� PPnlnq Sol IAWn E.XInq Soil �� Mavwvox SHRUB PLANTING DETAIL N.T.S. _ cePMNC wSex. '�� V (iw uu w,b°a sywnl TYPICAL STAKING FOR PALMS N.T.S. TREE & SHRUB PLANTING DETAILS TREE STAKING & PLANTING DETAIL " s_a ' N.T.S. .. .., _ ...... ... --,_ .�.___. NAMWOGJB PINES MD SPECIMEN TREES p�0 O Opp I p 1 I I MI wow I MM.y. I I I I I I I I I A 1 I I 1 1 A : 4'k2'E2' VeRicd Sfpkesj I FULL ORIPLNE FULL ORIPUNE 1 WOW FENCE i DRIP MES ARE TO BE PLACED THE NLL DRIP KEPT OF ACED HARDWOOD AND PINT TREES MD KEPI MAINTAINED DURING CONSTRUCTION PROTECTIVE BARRIER DETAIL N.T.S. TREE BARRICADE DETAILS REQUIRED TREE BARRICADE AND EROSION CONTROL MEASURES MUST REMAIN INTACT THROUGH CONSTRUCTION. ENCROACHMENT INTO OR FAILURE TO MAINTAIN THESE BARRICADES ''WILL RESULT IN ENFORCEMENT ACTION WHICH MAY INCLUDE CITATIONS AND /OR PERMIT REVOCATION. TREE BARRICADE NOTES: I. BARRIERS ME TO BE ERECTS, AROUND ALL TREES 4' DBH MD GREATER TO REMAIN. THIS MUST BE DONE BEFORE CONSTRICTION. OR ANY TREES ME REMDVED. Z. BARRIERS ARE TO REMAIN IN PLACE UNTIL ALL PAVING AND CONSTRUCTION ARE CONE AND WAVY EQUIPMENT IS OUT OF THE AREA 3. TREES 4' DBH AND GREATER THAT ME LOCATED WITHIN TEN FEE OF THE LOT UNDER CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE PROTECTED BY A BARRICADE. 4. PUCE W HEAW EQUIPMENT INSIDE THE BARRIER. ONLY HAND LIBOR. 5. PLACE NO CONETRUCTION MATERIAL OR SOIL DEPOSITS INSIDE BARRIER AREA fi. MINIMUM RADIUS 10 BE PROTECTED: A PINES-FOUL DRIPUNE OR B' WHICHEVER IS GREATER. B. HARDWOODS -FULL DRPIJNE OR 6' 'WHICHEVER IS GREATER. T. MEN= OF ERECTION (SEE DAGRAM): A MIN. HEIGHT OF UPRIGHTS 4' AND NO LESS THM 2' .2" LUMBER. B. UPRIGHTS SHOULD HAVE HORIZONTAL RMONING AT THE TOP AND 12' BELOW THE TOP C. UPRIGHTS SHOULD BE SPACED AT NO MORE THAN B' IN-S. D. HDRIZONTAL MEMBERS OF NO LESS THAN 1'X 2' LUMBER. 1 R.G. 08 /14/ SONEY FM LLC REV. DESCRIPTION BY DATE EB # 9746 GARDEN AVENUE COMPLEX 16306 DOUNE CT. TAMPA, FL 33647 CLIENT: HASHIM SULLAIMAN DRAWN BY: Rc I CHECKED BY: PH: (727)420 -4796 uxAnow1505 FT. HARRISON GS w 02"7T FAX: (813)972 -2846 503 MARSHALL TILE NAME I.LECT I I Si DESCRIPTION: __.._ I I . c' O //J\\ W E %l pmwAe pl ro Fa Fm Rve TREE STAKING & PLANTING DETAIL " s_a ' N.T.S. .. .., _ ...... ... --,_ .�.___. NAMWOGJB PINES MD SPECIMEN TREES p�0 O Opp I p 1 I I MI wow I MM.y. I I I I I I I I I A 1 I I 1 1 A : 4'k2'E2' VeRicd Sfpkesj I FULL ORIPLNE FULL ORIPUNE 1 WOW FENCE i DRIP MES ARE TO BE PLACED THE NLL DRIP KEPT OF ACED HARDWOOD AND PINT TREES MD KEPI MAINTAINED DURING CONSTRUCTION PROTECTIVE BARRIER DETAIL N.T.S. TREE BARRICADE DETAILS REQUIRED TREE BARRICADE AND EROSION CONTROL MEASURES MUST REMAIN INTACT THROUGH CONSTRUCTION. ENCROACHMENT INTO OR FAILURE TO MAINTAIN THESE BARRICADES ''WILL RESULT IN ENFORCEMENT ACTION WHICH MAY INCLUDE CITATIONS AND /OR PERMIT REVOCATION. TREE BARRICADE NOTES: I. BARRIERS ME TO BE ERECTS, AROUND ALL TREES 4' DBH MD GREATER TO REMAIN. THIS MUST BE DONE BEFORE CONSTRICTION. OR ANY TREES ME REMDVED. Z. BARRIERS ARE TO REMAIN IN PLACE UNTIL ALL PAVING AND CONSTRUCTION ARE CONE AND WAVY EQUIPMENT IS OUT OF THE AREA 3. TREES 4' DBH AND GREATER THAT ME LOCATED WITHIN TEN FEE OF THE LOT UNDER CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE PROTECTED BY A BARRICADE. 4. PUCE W HEAW EQUIPMENT INSIDE THE BARRIER. ONLY HAND LIBOR. 5. PLACE NO CONETRUCTION MATERIAL OR SOIL DEPOSITS INSIDE BARRIER AREA fi. MINIMUM RADIUS 10 BE PROTECTED: A PINES-FOUL DRIPUNE OR B' WHICHEVER IS GREATER. B. HARDWOODS -FULL DRPIJNE OR 6' 'WHICHEVER IS GREATER. T. MEN= OF ERECTION (SEE DAGRAM): A MIN. HEIGHT OF UPRIGHTS 4' AND NO LESS THM 2' .2" LUMBER. B. UPRIGHTS SHOULD HAVE HORIZONTAL RMONING AT THE TOP AND 12' BELOW THE TOP C. UPRIGHTS SHOULD BE SPACED AT NO MORE THAN B' IN-S. D. HDRIZONTAL MEMBERS OF NO LESS THAN 1'X 2' LUMBER. 1 R.G. 08 /14/ SONEY FM LLC REV. DESCRIPTION BY DATE EB # 9746 GARDEN AVENUE COMPLEX 16306 DOUNE CT. TAMPA, FL 33647 CLIENT: HASHIM SULLAIMAN DRAWN BY: Rc I CHECKED BY: PH: (727)420 -4796 uxAnow1505 FT. HARRISON GS w 02"7T FAX: (813)972 -2846 503 MARSHALL TILE NAME I.LECT I I Si DESCRIPTION: __.._ I I . Ll SOUTH FACADE SCALE: 1/4" = l'-O" EAST FACADE SCALE: 1 /11" - l'-O" 4% - �104- 3� uj C) ;2: cf) X C= C114 �-A • RETENTION POND CALCULATIONS Site Area: 7720 SF Existing Impervious Area: 5262 SF Proposed Basin Area: 5630 SF VOLUME PROVIDED BY RETENTION AREA Top Area: 37'X 13' @ EL. 29.75' Bottom Area: 15'X 2' @ EL. 26.75' Depth 3.0' Note: Water Table Seasonal High @ EL. 20.75' (DRI Field Test) Volume Provided = 3.0 X (39'x14' + 15'x2') / 2 =864 CF Cpre. _ (0.9/2) ((5262 + (0.2x2458)) / 7720 = 0.37 Cpost. _ (0.9) ((5630 + 481 + (0.2x2090)) / 7720 = 0.76 AC = 0.76 — 0.37 = 0.39 Rain Intensity (25 yr.) = 3.6 in /hr Q = (0.39 x 3.6 x 5630) / 43560 = 0.18 CF /S =640 CFH Rain Intensity (50 yr.) = 4.0 in /hr Q = (0.39 x 4.0 x 5630) / 43560 = 0.120 CF /S =720 CFH Then, Volume Required for 50 yr= 720 CF Volume Provided (864 CF) is Greater than Volume Required (720. CF). THEREFORE, DESIGN IS ACCEPTABLE. Pond Recovery Avg. Infiltration rate based on the ,DIRI test = 110 ft/d Using Factor of Safety of 2 Bottom of Bond Area = 15'x2'= 30 sq.ft. Volume Pond can handle in 24.hrs. _ (110/2) (15'x2') = 1650 CF /day Volume Provi WIN 4 CF Recovery : t 6 "�24 12.57 Hrs. < 36 Hrs. �,A ` GO e; •.: Therq D� r S e~ =r�" I$ v �F � �;L� P t 's • 0 R��.r.`(.�.ks. • *1 R.nTM 4 MAR 1 0 2010 ' � CLEAMN191. - -R S06EY FM LLC, EO # 9746 727- 420 -4796 Civil ® Structural ■ Land Development Engineers FAX 813- 972 -2846 16306 Doune Ct., Tampa Fl, 33647 P.P.E. # 47431 Authorized by the State of Florida, Board of Professional Engineers, to offer Engineering Services. IN .......... ` d 1504 Garden, Street RAM A. GGEL, PH.D, P.E. 947431 08/12/09 „d'Edl� DRAINAGE NARRATIVE The proposed construction activities consist of the following: • Construction of about 5,000 S.F. of open impervious vehicular use and sidewalk area. • Construction of a stormwater pond to provide water quality treatment for a volume equal to %2" of runoff over the entire site. Treatment of stormwater will be achieved through natural percolation. • Overflow will pop -off into the existing Gutter at SE corner of Ft. Harrison Ave. • The more stringent of SWFWMD's 25yr / 24hr post- development flow not exceeding the 25yr / 24hr pre - development flow vs. Clearwater's weighted coefficient of runoff of stormwater detention was used to determine the storage volume requirement. It was found that the City of Clearwater's stormwater requirement (676 cf) was more strict than S VV I' VV 1V1L s requlr eilleilt ail(1 LIXI C101 C was l,lseu 111 the design of the pond. • The Drainage Calculations have been prepared in accordance with the City of Clearwater Drainage Manual. • The project is located in an open basin. Construction of this project will not increase the existing peak discharge rate or volume. • No wetlands are located in or adjacent to the project area. No wetland impacts will result from construction of this project. NA A U 0 1 F L..4�E riQ F 4i� t RI h �t RETENTION POND CALCULATIONS Site Area: 7720 SF Existing Impervious Area: 5262 SF Proposed Basin Area: 5638 SF VOLUME PROVIDED BY RETENTION AREA Top Area: 37'X 13' @ EL. 29.75' Bottom Area: 15'X 2' @ EL. 27.25' Depth 2.5' Note: Water Table Seasonal High @ EL. 20.75' (DRI Field Test) Volume Provided = 2.5'X (37'x13' + 15'x2') 12 = 640 CF Cpre. _ (0.9/2) ((5262 + (0.2x2458)) / 7720 = 0.37 Cpost. _ (0.9) ((5630 + 481 + (0.2x2090)) / 7720 = 0.76 AC = 0.76 — 0.37 = 0.39 Rain Intensity (25 yr.) = 3.6 in /hr Q = (0.39 x 3.6 x 5638) / 43560 = 0.18 CF /S = 640 CFH Then, Volume Required = 640 CF Volume Provided (640 CF) is Equal to Volume Required (640 CF). THEREFORE, DESIGN IS ACCEPTABLE. Pond Recovery Avg. Infiltration rate based on the DIRI test = 110 ft/d Using Factor of Safety of 2 Bottom of Bond Area = 15'x2'= 30 sq.ft. Volume Pond can handle in 24 hrs. _ (110/2) (15'x2') = 1650 CF /day Volume Provided = 640 CF Recovery = (640/1650) x 24 = 9.37 Hrs. Therefore, Design is Acceptable OMGMAIL Au''I���Yr�� p�1e � re'lM GeoEngineering, Inc. Environmental Engineering _ Consultants February 25, 2004 ORIGINAL REC CD Mr. Hashifn Sullaiman JUN 10 2009 1504 Garden Avenue, Inc. 1504 N. Garden Ave. PLANNING Clearwater, FL 33755 RE: Soil Boring & Double Ring Infiltrometer Testing 1504 GARDEN AVENUE, INC. SE CORNER OF F. HARRISON AND MARSHALL CLEARWATER, FLORIDA Dear Sullaiman: GeoEngineering, Inc. is pleased to submit this report for your review regarding the above referenced project. With reference to your authorization, one (1) soil boring to a maximum depth of 10 feet and one (1) Double Ring Infiltrometer (DR[) test were performed on February 25, 2004 at the above site. Test procedures used were in general accordance with the applicable ASTM Standard Procedures for geotechnical practice. The soil profile was obtained by hand auger boring. The test location was determined by proposed location of the retention pond (Plate #1 of this report). The soil parameters obtained during our field activities may be used in the design of the retention ponds. The following tests were conducted to arrive at the recommended design parameters. In -situ permeability was measured in the field by a Double Ring Infiltrometer (DRI) test based on ASTM D -3385 procedure. The results are applicable for the unsaturated condition analysis according to Standard Drainage Manual. The storage coefficient was based on an assumed porosity of 0.3 and a calculated unit weight of 98.0 pcf. The location of the soil boring and the DRI test are shown on Plate #1. The boring log is shown in Plate #2 and the DRI test results are shown in Plate #3. A summary of the DRI tests results is as follows: DESIGN PARAMETERS Vertical Hydraulic Conductivity (Kv) Unsaturated Vertical Hydraulic Conductivity (Kuv) Horizontal Permeability (Kh) Recommended Factor of Safety Effective Storage Coefficient Design Groundwater Elevation RESULTS 110 ft/day 73 ft/day 166 ft/day 1.50 0.30 19.75' (10 ft. below surface) 10940 N. 56th Street, Suite 201, Tampa, FL. 33617 -3004 a Phone (813) 988 -8600 • Fax (813) 988 -8556 • • ORBmIP7AL. REM) JUN 10 2009 PLANNING There was water entry at a depth of 10 feet below the land surface in the soil boring. The groundwater seasonal high at the subject site, may be assumed at a depth of 8.5 feet below land surface. The test data and soil boring log obtained by auger boring are shown in the attached sheets. DESIGN OF POND UNDERDRAINS A retention pond may be designed with the bottom of the pond one -foot above the Design Groundwater Elevation. If additional water quality volume is required, exfiltration type retention can be designed using the area under the parking and paved, areas. In the design of such a system, either an exfiltration system design as installed in -situ, or a prefabricated system such as an infiltrometer engineered prefabricated system or any equivalent system approved by an engineer may be used. Underdrains under paved areas are applicable if the volume of retention exceeds the allowable areas. We appreciate the opportunity to serve as your geotechnical consultant. If you need any additional information, please feel free to contact our office. Sincerely, Ash coub Field Engineer Adel . B11ZI G Ft_ Professional Geologist # Director of Engineering Services ' " "'"• ORIGINAL REC JUN 1 0 2000 PLANNING LIST OF PLATES Plate # 1: Location of Soil Boring and DRI Plate #2: Boring Log Plate #3: DRI Test Plate # 4: Typical DRI Percolation Test NOTE: Source "SITE PLANE" R HUNT Engineering, Inc. Plate # 1 ®RI Test Location ORIGINAL RECD JUG! 1 2009 PLANNING �k o - � to. W� je jW n/ D O 0 u ✓ r�r��yy -W A v K-r] "M 0 BORING LOG Weather: partially cloudy Location: See Location Map Water Level: 10 feet below surface Client: 1504 Garden Avenue, Inc. IF] JUN 10 2009 PLATE --" Project Site: SE Corner Ft. Harrison & Marshall, Clearwater, FL Date: February 25, 2004 Insitu Tests: Nil Job #: 040209 Depth ft Log Description 0-11 Black top soil 1' — 2' Tan Fine to Medium Sand 25-31- Tan Fine to Medium Sand 3' — 4' Tan Fine to Medium Sand C— 5' Tan Fine to Medium Sand 5' — 6' Tan Fine to Medium Sand 6' — 7' Tan Fine to Medium Sand 7' — 8' Tan Fine to Medium Sand 8' — 9' Tan Fine to Medium Sand 91-10, Tan Fine to Medium Sand GeoEngineering, Inc. fORIGIN L REMY JP i1N 1 0 2009 Plate # 3 DOUBLE RING INFILTROMETER (DRI) TEST Date: February 25, 2004 Site: SE Corner of Ft. Harrison & Marshall, Clearwater, FL Operator: Ash Yacoub Client: 1504 Garden Avenue, Inc. Weather: Cloudy Type: Double Ring. Infiltrometer Rain: No Depth: 18" below land surface Soil Type: Fine to medium Sand Job #: 040209 Inner Ring QR) Total Time in (Sec) DROP INCITES Outer Ring LORI Total Time (Sec) Drop in Inches 54 1 42 1 57 1 49 1 58 1 50 1 58 1 50 1 61 1 59 1 58 1 57 1 61 1 61 1 65 1 64 1 59 1 61 1 58 1 58 1 65 1 64 1 65 1 64 1 65 1 63 1 64 1 64 1 65 1 65 1 65 1 65 1 65 1 65 1 65 1 65 1 Kv = 110 ft /day Kuv = 73 ft /day Kh = 166 ft /day Water Table @ 10 ft. below ground surface. Seasonal High Water Table assumed @ 8.5 ft. below ground surface. Test Conducted by Field Engineer: Ash Yacoub Certified by FL Professional Geologist:_ Adel. Blasi, PG. GeoEngineering, Inc. e ICxl�or. Cir�r�s✓ •. - Ll N PLATE V VALVG� l.1GA�= �tJtLt>,1G -t �tA:�j 3n— 1� 11. ea I11J�gg �rar2A�IHt_ t �I P% DOUBLE RING IN II_TROIV ETER I'ERC01'_�l'�T ION TEST - GeoEngineering, Inc. Site : SE Corner -Ft: Harrison & Marshall ClearNater, Elorida Date: 02/25/04 Southwest Florida Water Management District An Equal Bartow Service Office Lecanto Service Office Opportunity 170 Century Boulevard Suite 226 Employer Bartow, Florida 33830 -7700 3600 West Sovereign Path (863) 534 -1448 or Lecanto, Florida 34461 -8070 1- 800-492 -7862 (FL only) (352) 527 -8131 Neil Combee Chair, Polk Todd Pressman Vice Chair, Pinellas Jennifer E. Closshey Secretary, Hillsborough Ronald E. Oakley Treasurer, Pasco Bryan K. Beswick Desoto Patricia M. Glass Manatee Hugh M. Gramling Hillsborough Albert G. Joerger Sarasota Sallie Parks Pinellas Maritza Rovira- Forino Hillsborough H. Paul Sonft, Jr. Polk Douglas B. Tharp Sumter Judith C. Whitehead Hernando David L. Moore Executive Director William S. Bilenky General Counsel r« April 9, 2009 Hashim Sullaiman 1504 Garden, Inc. 1504 North Garden Avenue Clearwater, FL 33755 F_1 J _ 2379 Broad Street, Brooksville, Florida 34604 -6899 (352) 796 -7211 or 1- 800 - 423 -1476 (FL only) TDD only 1- 800 - 231 -6103 (FL only) On the Internet at: WaterMatters.org Sarasota Service Office 6750 Fruitville Road Sarasota, Florida 34240 -9711 (941) 377 -3722 or 1-800- 320 -3503 (FL only) Subject: Notice of Final Agency Action - Approval Modification of Permit by Letter Project Name: 1505 Ft. Harrison /503 Marshall Permit No.: 47026989.002 County: Pinellas Sec/Twp /Rge: 09/29S/1 5E Letter Received: March 12, 2009 Expiration Date: April 22, 2014 Tampa Service Office 7601 Highway 301 North Tampa, Florida 33637 -6759 (813) 985 -7481 or 1- 800 -836 -0797 (FL only) OFtIGiIdAIL REC'® JUG? 10 200g PLANNING References: Chapters 40D -4 and 40, Florida Administrative Code (F.A.C.) Sections 373.4141 and 120.60, Florida Statutes (F.S.) Dear Mr. Sullaiman: Your request to modify Permit No. 47026989.000 by letter has been approved. This modification authorizes: 1. Extending the duration of this permit until April 22, 2014. 2. All other terms and conditions of Permit No. 47026989.000, dated May 13, 2004, and entitled 1505 Ft. Harrison /503 Marshall apply. Plans and information you submitted to support your request to modify this permit will be kept on file. Final approval is contingent upon no objection to the District's action being received by the District within the time frames described below. You or any person whose substantial interests are affected by the District's action regarding a permit may request an administrative hearing in accordance with Sections 120.569 and 120.57, Florida Statutes, (F.S.), and Chapter 28 -106, Florida Administrative Code, (F.A.C.), of the Uniform Rules of Procedure. A request for hearing must: (1) explain how the substantial interests of each person requesting the hearing will be affected by the District's action, or proposed action, (2) state all material facts disputed by the person requesting the hearing or state that there are no disputed facts; and (3) otherwise comply with Chapter 28 -106, F,A.C. Copies of Sections 28- 106.201 and 28- 106.301, F.A.C. are enclosed for your reference. Permit No.: 47026989.002 0 Page 2 of 2 0 April 9, 2009 A request for hearing must be filed with (received by) the Agency Clerk of the District at the District's Brooksville address within 21 days of receipt of this notice. Receipt is deemed to be the fifth day after the date on which this notice is deposited in the United States mail. Failure to file a request for hearing within this time period shall constitute a waiver of any right you or such person may have to request a hearing under Sections 120.569 and 120.57, F.S. Mediation pursuant to Section 120.573, F.S., to settle an administrative dispute regarding the District's. action in this matter is not available prior to the filing of a request for hearing. Enclosed is a "Noticing Packet" that provides information regarding the District Rule 40D- 1.1010, F.A.C., which addresses the notification of persons whose substantial interests may be affected by the District's action in this matter. The packet contains guidelines on how to provide notice of the District's action, and a notice that you may use. If you have questions regarding this letter modification, please contact Nathan G. Valentin, at the Tampa Service Office, extension 2140. Sincerely, Z53zl Ylka-0 Alba E. Mas, P.E., Director Tampa Regulation Department AEM: NGV:CAL:gjn Enclosure: Noticing Packet (42.00 -039) Sections 28- 106.201 and 28- 106.301, F.A.C. cc: File of Record 47026989.002 Ram A. Goel, Ph.D, P.E., Soney FM, LLC JUN 1 0 2009 PLANNING C 0 Ci LU O 0 O t/ x WD-1 5/93 0 This Warranty Deed (0 Made This 3rd day of December by Abdelmaged Mustafa Ahmed hereinafter called the grantor, to 1504 Garden Inc. whose post office address is: 1504 N. Garden.Avenue Clearwater, Florida 33755 Grantees' SSN; A.D. 2001 Y RAGES a. ACCT # CHG AMT CK AMr AEC DS DR219_ A6 93�,� INT FEES MTF _ WC REV TOTAL o�QcE7 aZS KARLEER F. DE BLAKER, CLERK OF COURT PAELLAS CM, FLORIDA 8MB1457 12-19 -2001 14:55:56 JTF .51 DED -1504 GARDEN 021D96 I #:01444362 BK:11741 SPG:1534 ERG:1535 RECORDING 002 PAGES . 1 $10.50 DOC STAMP GUECTION 2 $330.75 DOC STAMP - DE19 3 $2,625.DO TOTAL: $2,966.25 CHECK AMT.TENXRED: $2,966.25 CHANGE: $.00 BY DEPUTY CLERK hereinafter called the grantee: ('5. f l (whenever wcd.hcmin the term 'grantor' and 'grankc' include all the panic to this insm,ment and the heirs, legal npresetuadva and auigns of individuals, and the successors and assigns of corporadow) Witnesseth, that the grantor, for and in consideration of the sum of $ 10 .00 and other valuable considerations, receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, hereby grants, bargains, sells, aliens, remises, releases, conveys and confirms unto the grantee, all that certain land situate in Pinellas s . County, Florida, *viz: See Schedule A at hereto and by this _reference_made_a_.nart... hereof . P iNELLRS CO OE C-19-2001 11741 1 PG 534 1111M IIIt M IIIII140lllll ill IM 1111IIE Subject to covenants, restrictions, easements of record and taxes for the current year. Said property is:not the homestead of the Grantor under the laws and constitution of the State of Florida in that neither Grantor or any members of the household of Grantor.:reside_ thereon. Parcel Identification Number: 09- 29- 15- 55530- 000 -0'050 Togetherwith all the tenements, hereditaments and appurtenances thereto belonging or in an appertaining. To Have and to Hold, the same in fee simple forever. And the grantor hereby covenants with said grantee that the grantor is lawfully seized of said land in fee simple; that the grantor has good right and lawful authority to sell and convey'said land; that the grantor hereby fully warrants the title to said land and will.defend the same against the lawful claims of all .persons whomsoever; and that said land is free of all encumbrances except taxes accruing subsequent to December 31, 2 0 O 1 In Witness Whereof, the said grantor has signed and sealed these presents the day and year first above written. . Signed, sealed and delivered in our presence: Qb �_J ,tress Pr" Name-de egg1s3�jfa Ahmed I iaJ ones` Pri t rte: TM -'.'SA A flat Ktness Print Neme: / TOSYJ ai i n. mess Print Name: _ State of Florida County of Hillsborough The foregoing. instrument was acknowledged before me this 3rd day of December 2001, by Abdelmaged Mustafa Ahmed who is personally known to me or who has produced drivers license as identification. I c i C � C-4 `> ; j Notary Public Print Name: My Commission E. ices: t LLJ PREPARED BY: A. Moody ppp THOk1AS T. ALCAY j � RETURN TO: Alday- Donalson Title o�o_ No cry Publlc Sla ed FlO da 11103 North 56th Street ^ "b Commission Explresreb.22.=c Temple Terrace, FL 33617 commev«,ccnsts� File No: 5 -01 -0995 y �T .Y rt} s Y CD 1 i r' T'sJi 7 P 0 .G _ 0 4 2000 cyt,� Schedule A pjlj.__LRS COUNTY FLR. OF-F.REC.BK I1741 PG 1535 Parcel 1. Lots 5, 6 and 7 of E.A. Matshall's subdivision, together with (now vacated) lying immediately the easterly 5 feet of the alley to map or plat recorded West of said Lots 5, 6 and 7, according the Public Records of Hillsborough in plat Book 7, Page 17, of Pinellas I County was formerly a part: County, Florida, of which EXCEPT that portion of said.Ltos 5, 6 and 7, lying LESS AND Easterly of the West right-of-way line of Garden Avenue. TOGETHER WITH . the following: Commence at the intersection of as recorded the North boundary. of Lot 3 of LESLEY'S.SUBDIV71SION in Deed Book K, Page.471, of the Public on February 4,.1884, Records of Hillsborough County, Florida, of which Pinellas -of-way e of CO . unty was formerly a part, with the WeP.tright it is presently occupied; thence North Garden Avenue as (basis of bearings is assumed) along the North 88*14134" West, boundary of said Lot 3, a dis . tance of 72.69.feet; thence South O the centerlin e 006 °0.4'06" West, along the Southerly extension lying West of Lots 5f , 6, and 7 and of a vacated 10 foot alley Marsha 11,9 Subdivision, as East of Lots .8, 9 and 10, E.A. in Plat Book, ?, Page 17, of the Public Records of was recorded county Hillsborough County, Flo ida, of which Pinellas thence South 81*14,34" East, 15- 00 formerly a part, .15.02 feet; Lot Southerly of and parallel to the North boundary of-said along feet 3, a distance of 70.62 feet; thence North 13157,3611 East, 15.06 feet to the. the West ri4lit of way line of Garden Avenue, Point of Beginning. Parcel 2 E.A. Marshall's Subdivision, according to the map or Lot 10 of d in Plat Book 7, Pag e 17, of the Public plat thereof as recorded County, Florida, of which Pinellas Hillsborough Recorils*Of County was .formerly �y a par . t AND certain vacated. l0 The North 50.15 feet of the West'5 feet of a 0 f E.A. the East line of Lot 10 foot alley running along to the map or plat thereof as Marshall's Subdivision, according the Public Records of Page 17, of reorded in Plat Book 7, of which Pinellas County was Hillsborough County, Florida, formerly a part. SUBJECT TO that certain mortgage to Bank of America, N.A. from recorded in Abdelmaged Mustafa Ahmed, dated August 24, 1999 ' a7-,d 659, 1715, of the public records of Official Records Volume 10 page Florida, securing a promissory note in t he original Pinellas County, .55. outstanding balance $22,389 amount of $39,153.00; current . SUBJECT TO that certain mortgage to Delaware Savings Bank from Abdelmage d dated November 25, 1997, and X. Ahmed and Gail Ahmed, husband and wife, in O.R. Book 9930, Page 1543, of the public records of Pinellas recorded County, Florida, securing a promissory note .in the original amount of. $82,000.00; current outstanding balance $72,045.78. File No.: 5-01-0995 CN-A CV , W CM LL. PEMEIVe 0 4 2000 cyt,� ALTA OWNER'S POLICY - 10 -17 -92 WITHAMRIDA MODIFICATIONS ':tf.1 /00,.want information about coverage or rP stance to resolve complaints, please call 1 -8[ 9902. If you make a claim under your policy, you must furnish written notice in accordance,. 7Mction 3 of the Conditions and Stipulations." Visit our World -Wide Web site at: httr): / /www.stewart.com POLICY OF TITLE INSURANCE ISSUED BY STEWA nT TITI.E GUARANTY COMPANY SUBJECT TO THE EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE THE SCHEDULE B AND THE CONDITIONS AND STIPULATIONS, °. ,J corporation, herein called the Company, insures,-:as of Date of Po exceeding the Amount of Insurance stated in Schedule A, sustain) 1. Title to the estate or interest described i.n: Schedule A bein 2. Any defect in or lien or encumbrance on the title , f 3. Unmarketability of the title; 4. Lack of a right of access to and from the The Company will also -pay the costs,' attorneys fees aild expi to the extent provided in the Conditions an& fpulatlonszd IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Stewart Title.,:Guarantyo. pa�n4y, duly authorized officers as of the Date of Policy, shown in ..Sch,ec T R:A N T Y COD man of /the Cou 7uthorized Signatory ALDAY- DONALSON TFOAGENCIES Company -f j 43 N 56th QTD E EPTIONS FROM COVERAGE CONTAINED IN FART TITLE GUARANTY COMPANY, a Texas town in Schedule A, against loss or damage, not incurred by the insured by reason of: than as stated therein; in defense of the title, as insured, but only this policy to be signed and sealed by its n 4 L2.ut00 ") PLAI"a' 4 `- P PAZZ e1 lFr q T T7107 r TFRRAGE R-33617 :' >�,y�, u;, d �. City, State EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE The following matters are expressly excluded from the coverage ;.of .tfiis policy and the Company will not pay loss or damage, costs, attorneys' fees or expenses which arise by reason of: 1. (a) Any law,. ordinance or governmental regulation (including but noijimited to`building and zoning laws, ordinances, or regulations) restricting, regulating, prohibiting or relating to (i) the occupancy, use, or enjoy'ment,of fhe land;'(ii) the character, dimensions or location of any improvement now or hereafter erected on the land; (iii) a separation in ownership or a change'. in ttie dimensions or area of the land 'or any parcel of which the land is or was a part; or (iv) environmental protection, or the effect of any violation of these laws, ordinances or governmental regulations, except to the extent that a notice of the enforcement thereof or a notice of a defect, lien or encumbrance resulting from`a 'violation or alleged violation affecting the land has been recorded in the public records at Date of Policy. (b) Any governmental police power not excluded by (a) above, except to the extent that a notice of the exercise thereof or a notice of a defect, lien or encumbrance resulting from a violation or alleged violation affecting the land has been recorded in the public records at Date of Policy. 2. Rights of eminent domain unless notice of the exercise thereof has been recorded in the public records at Date of Policy, but not excluding from coverage_ any taking which has occurred prior to Date of Policy which would be binding on the rights of a purchaser for value without knowledge. 3. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters: l._.._. (a) created, suffered, assumed or agreed to by the insured claimant; ' (b) not known to the Company, not recorded in the public records at Date of Policy, but known to the insured claimant and not disclosed in writing to the Company by the insured claimant prior to the date the insured claimant became an insured under this policy; (c) resulting in no loss or damage to the insured claimant: (d) attaching or created subsequent to Date of Policy; or (e) resulting in loss or damage which would not have been sustained if the insured claimant had paid value for the estate or interest insured by this policy. 4. Any claim, which arises out of the transaction vesting in the Insured the estate or interest insured by this policy, by reason of the operation of federal bankruptcy, state insolvency, or similar creditors' rights laws, that is based on: (a) the transaction creating the estate or interest insured by this policy being deemed a fraudulent conveyance or fraudulent transfer; or (b) the transaction creating the estate or interest insured by this policy being deemed a preferential transfer except where the preferential transfer results from the failure: (i) to timely record the instrument of transfer; or (ii) of such recordation to impart notice to a purchaser for value or a judgment or lien creditor. n Page t of 0 -2125- 374268 Policy Serial No. jl ; • CONDITIONS AND STIPULATIONS I! 1• DEFINITION OF TERMS. The following terms when used in this policy mean: (a) "insured ": the insured named in Schedule A, and, subject to any right or defenses the Company would have had against the named insured, those wh j succeed to the interest of the named insured by operation of law as distinguished from purchase including, but not limited to, heirs, distributees, devisees, survivors personal representatives, next of kin, or corporate or fiduciary successors. (b) "insured claimant ": on insured claiming loss or damage. j or notice which may be imputed to any insured bydreasontof constructive public as defined in this policy or any other records which impart constructive notice of matters affecting the land. (d) "land ": the land described or referred to in Schedule A, and im rove - I ments affixed thereto which by law constitute real property. The term 'land" i does not include any property beyond the lines of the area described or referred to in Schedule A, nor any right, title, interest, estate or easement in abutting streets, roads, avenues, alleys, lanes, ways or waterways, but nothing herein shall modify or limit the extent to which a right of access to and from the land -is insured b� this policy. (e) 'mortgage': mortgage, deed of trust, trust deed, or other security instrument. (f) public records ": records established under state statutes at Date of Pol- icy for the purpose of imparting constructive notice of matters relating to real property to purchasers for value and without knowledge. With respect to Section 1(0)(iv) of the Exclusions From Coverage, "public records" shall also include environmental protection liens filed in the records of the clerk of the United States district court for the district in which the land is located. (g) "unmorketability of the title ": an alleged or apparent matter affecting the title to the.land, not excluded or excepted from coverage, which would entitle a purchaser of the estate or interest described in Schedule A to be released from the obligation to purchase by yiitue of a, contractual condition requiring the delivery of marketable title. 2• CONTINUATION OF INSURANCE AFTER CONVEYANCE OF TITLE. The coverage of this policy shall .continue. in force' -as of Date of Policy, in favor of an insured only so long as the insured retains an estate or interest in the land, or holds an indebtedness secured by a purchase money mortgage given by a purchaser from the insured, or only so long as the insured shall have liability by reason of covenants of warranty made by the insured in any transfer or convey. once of the estate or interest. This policy shall not continue in force in favor of any purchaser from the insured of either (i) an estate or interest in the land, or (ii) an indebtedness secured by a purchase money mortgage given to the insured. 3. NOTICE OF CLAIM TO BE GIVEN BY INSURED CLAIMANT. The insured shall notify #k. r .. litigation as set forth in 5ediony4(a) below�(i)nincase knowledge in case of shall come to an insured hereunder of any claim of title or interest which is adverse to the title to the estate or interest, as insured, and which might cause loss or damage for which the Company may be liable by virtue of this policy, or (iii) if title to the estate or interest, as insured, is rejected as unmarketable. If prompt notice shall not be given to the Company, then as to the insured all liability of the Company shall terminate with regard to the matter or matters for which prompt notice is required; provided, however, that failure to notify the Company shall in no case prejudice the rights of any insured under this policy unless the Company shall be prejudiced by the failure and then only to the extent of the prejudice. 4. DEFENSE AND PROSECUTION OF ACTIONS; DUTY OF INSURED CLAIMANT TO COOPERATE. (a) Upon written request by the insured and subject to the options contained in Section b of these Conditions and Stipulations, the Company, of its own cost and without unreasonable delay, shall provide for the defense of an insured in litigation in which any third party asserts a claim adverse to the title or interest as insured, but only as to those stated causes of action alleging a defect, lien or encumbrance or other matter insured against by this policy. The Company shall have the right to select counsel of its choice (subject to the right of the insured to object for reasonable cause to represent the insured as to those stated causes of action and shall not be liable for and will not pay the fees of any other counsel. The Company will not pay an fees, costs or expenses incurred by the insured in the defense of those causes of action which allege matters not insured against by this policy. (b) The Company shall have the right, at its own cost, to institute and prose. cute any action or proceeding or to do any other act which in its opinion may be necessary or desirable to establish the title to the estate or interest, as insured, or to prevent or reduce loss or damage to the insured. The Company may take any appropriate action under the terms of this policy, whether or not it shall be liable hereunder, and shall not thereby concede liability or waive any provision of this Policy. If the Company shall exercise its rights under this paragraph, it shall do so diligently. (c) Whenever the Company shall have brought an action or interposed a defense as required or permitted by the provisions of this policy, the Company onyandsexpresslylgreserves othe aright ein' its asole bdiscaretion, tocappeal from any adverse judgment or order. (d) In all cases where this policy permits or requires the Company to Pros cute or provide for the defense of any action or proceeding, the insured she s secure to the Company the right to so prosecute or provide defense in the attic 0 or proceeding, and all appeals therein, and permit the Company to use, at i option, the name of the insured for this purpose. Whenever requested by th Company, the insured, at the Company's expense, shall give the Company a reasonable aid (i) in any action or proceeding, securing evidence, obtaining wi; nesses, prosecuting or defending the action or proceeding, or effecting settle ment, and (ii) in any other lawful act which in the opinion of the Company ma be necessary or desirable to establish the title to the estate or interest as insured If the Company is prejudiced by the failure of the insured to furnish the requires cooperation, the Company's obligations to the insured under the policy shall ter minate, including any liability or obligation to defend, prosecute, or continue any litigation, with regard to the matter or matters requiring such cooperation. 5. PROOF OF LOSS OR DAMAGE. In addition to and after the notices required under Section 3 of these Condi- tions and Stipulations have been provided the Company, a proof of loss or dam- age signed and sworn to by the insured claimant shall be furnished to the Com- pany within 90 days after the insured claimant shall ascertain the facts giving rise to the loss or damage. The Proof of loss or damage shall describe the defect in, or lien or encumbrance on the title, or other matter insured against by this policy which constitutes the basis of loss or damage and shall state, ble, the basis of calculating the amount of the to the extent possi- loss or damage. If the Company is rejudiced by the failure of the insured claimant to provide the required proof of loss or damage, the Company's obligations to the insured under the policy shall terminate, including any liability or obligation to defend, prosecute, or continue any litigation, with regard to the matter or matters requiring such proof of loss or damage. In addition, the in claimant may reasonably be required to submit to examination under oath by any authorized representative of the Company and .shall produce for examination, inspection and copying, at such reasonable times and places as may be designated by any authorized representative of the Com. pony, all records, books, ledgers, checks, correspondence and memoranda, whether bearing a date before or after Date of Policy, which reasonably pertain to the loss or damage. Further, if requested by any authorized representative of the;Company, the insured claimant shall grant its permission, in writing, for any authorized .representative of the Company to examine, inspect and copy oil records, books, ledgers, checks, correspondence and memoranda in the custody or control of a third party, which reasonably pertain to the loss or damage. All information designated as confidential by the insured claimant provided to the Company pursuant to this Section shall not be disclo > -� reasoriabie to others unless in the judgment of the Company, it is necessary in the administration of the claim. Failure of the insured claimant to submit for examination under oath, pro- duce other reasonably requested information or grant permission to secure rea. sonably necessary information from third parties as required in this paragraph shall terminate any liability of the Company under this policy as to that claim. 6. OPTIONS TO PAY OR OTHERWISE SETTLE CLAIMS; TERMINATION OF LIABILITY. In case of a claim under this policy, the Company shall have the following additional options: (a) To Pay or Tender Payment of the Amount of Insurance. To pay or tender payment of the amount of insurance under this policy together with any costs, attorneys' fees and expenses incurred by the insured claimant, which were authorized by the Company, up to the time of payment or tender of payment and which the Company is obligated to Pay. Upon the exercise by the Company of this option, all liability, and obligations to the insured under this policy, other than to make the payment required, shall terminate, including any liability or obligation to defend, prosecute, or continue any litigation, . and the policy shall be surrendered to the Company for cancellation. (b) To Pay or Otherwise Settle With Parties Other than the Insured or With the Insured Claimant. (i) to pay or otherwise settle with other parties for or in the name of anN insured claimant any claim insured against under this policy, together with any ;-,j costs, attorneys' fees and expenses incurred by the insured claimant which were authorized by the Company up to the time of payment and which the Company _ is obligated to pay; or (ii) to pay or otherwise settle with the insured claimant the loss or dam -_ k age provided for under this policy, together with any costs, attorneys' fees and expenses incurred by the insured claimant which were authorized by the Com- pany up to the time of payment and which the Company is obligated to pay. Upon the exercise by the Company of either of the options provided for in paragraphs (b)(i) or (ii), the Company's obligations to the insured under this pol- icy for the claimed loss or damage, other than the payments required to be made, shall terminate, including any liability or obligation to defend, prosecute or continue any litigation. 7. DETERMINATION, EXTENT OF LIABILITY. This policy is a contract of indemnity against actual monetary loss or dam- age sustained or incurred by the insured claimant who has sufferPrl Incc -- a,._ age by rencnn ,;f .. _- . t If • CONDITIONS AND STIPULATIONS Continued (continued and concluded from reverse side of Policy Face) (a) The liability of the Company under this policy shall not exceed the least If: (i) the Amount of Insurance stated in Schedule A; or, (ii) the difference between the value of the insured estate or interest as nsured and the value of the insured estate or interest subject to the defect, lien >r encumbrance insured against by this policy. (b) (This paragraph removed in Florida policies.) (c) The Company will pay only those costs, attorneys' fees and expenses ncurred in accordance with Section 4 of the Conditions and Stipulations. 1. APPORTIONMENT. If the land described in Schedule A consists of two or more parcels which are tot used as a single site, and a loss is established affecting one or more of the )orcels but not all, the loss shall be computed and settled on a pro rata basis as f the amount of insurance under this policy was divided pro rata as to the value m Date of Policy of each separate parcel to the whole, exclusive of any mprovements made subsequent to Date of Policy, unless a liability or value has )therwise been agreed upon as to each parcel by the Company and the insured at the time of the issuance of this policy and shown by an express statement or by an endorsement attached to this policy. �. LIMITATION OF LIABILITY. ". (a) If the Company establishes the'title, or removes the alleged: defect, lien Dr encumbrance, or cures the lack of a right of access to_or. from the land, or :ures the claim of unmarketability of title, all as insured, in a reasonably diligent manner by any method, including litigation and the completion of any appeals therefrom, it shall have fully performed its obligations with respect to that matter and shall not be liable for any loss or damage caused thereby. (b) In the event of any litigation, including litigation by the Company or with the Company's consent, the Company shall have no liability for loss or damage until there has been a final determination by a court of competent jurisdiction, and disposition of all appeals therefrom, adverse to the title as insured. (c) The Company shall not be liable for loss or damage to any insured for liability voluntarily assumed by the insured in settling any claim or suit without the prior written consent of the Company. 10. REDUCTION OF INSURANCE; REDUCTION OR TERMINATION OF LIABILITY. All payments under this policy, except payments made for costs, attorneys' fees and expenses, shall reduce the amount of the insurance pro tanto. 11. LIABILITY NONCUMULATIVE. It is expressly understood that the amount of insurance under this policy L _II L _ J d ly L_ /'__. -__.. -.. ,-.. - a.. UAd an" ^ ^I "" :n ln^ Snuu be reduced ur arfy aIT16Uilt tnc \.VIIItJUIIr -IIIUr r�r r N""`7 y a mortgage to which exception is taken in Schedule B or to which the insured has agreed, assumed, or taken subject, or which is hereafter executed by an insured and which is a charge or lien on the estate or interest described or referred to in Schedule A, and the amount so paid shall be deemed a payment under this policy to the insured owner. 12. PAYMENT OF LOSS. (a) No payment shall be made without producing this policy for endorse- ment of the payment unless the PPolicy has been lost or destroyed, in which case proof of loss or destruction shall be furnished to the satisfaction of the Company. (b) When liability and the extent of loss or damage has been definitely fixed in accordance with these Conditions and Stipulations, the loss or damage shall be payable within 30 days thereafter. 13. SUBROGATION UPON PAYMENT OR SETTLEMENT. (a) The Company's Right of Subrogation. Whenever the Company shall have settled and paid a claim under this pol- icy, all right of subrogation shall vest in the Company unaffected by any act of the insured claimant. . The Company shall be subrogated to and be entitled to all rights and reme- dies which the insured claimant would have had against any person or property in respect to the claim had this policy not been issued. If requested by the Com- pany, the insured claimant shall transfer to the Company all rights and remedies against any person or property necessary in order to perfect this right of subro- gation. The insured claimant shall permit the Company to sue, compromise or settle in the name of the insured claimant and to use the name of the insured claimant in any transaction or litigation involving these rights or remedies. If a payment on account of a claim does not fully cover the loss of the insured claimant, the Company shall. be subrogated to these rights and remedies in the proportion which the Company's payment bears to the whole amount of the loss. If loss should result from any act of the insured claimant, as stated above, that act shall not void this policy, but the Company, in that event, shall be required to Pay only that part of any losses insured against by this policy which shall exceed the amount, if any, lost to the Company by reason of the impair- ment by the insured claimant of the Company's right of subrogation. (b) The Company's Rights Against Non- insured Obligors. The Company's right of subrogation against non - insured obligors shall exist and shall include, without limitation, the rights of the insured to indemnities, gua- ranties, other policies of insurance or bonds, notwithstanding any terms or condi- tions contained in those instruments which provide for subrogation rights by rea- son of this policy. 14. ARBITRATION Unless prohibited by applicable law, arbitration pursuant to the Title Insur- ance Arbitration Rules of the American Arbitration Association may be demanded if agreed to by both the Company and the insured: •Arbitrable. matters may include but ire not limited to any coritroversy or claim between the company° and the insured arising out of or relating to this policy, any service of the Company in connection with its issuance or the breach of a policy provision or other obligation Arbitration pursuant to this policy and under the Rules in effect on the date the demand for arbitration is made or, at the option of the insured, the Rules in effect at Date of Policy shall be binding upon the parties. The award may include attorneys' fees only if the laws of the state in which the land is located permit a court to award attorneys' fees to a prevailing party. Judgment upon the award rendered by the Arbitrator(s) may be entered in any court having jurisdiction thereof. The law of the situs of the land shall apply to an arbitration under the Title Insurance Arbitration Rules. A copy of the Rules may be obtained from the Company upon request. 15. LIABILITY LIMITED TO THIS POLICY; POLICY ENTIRE CONTRACT. (a) This policy together with all endorsements, if any, attached hereto by the Company is the entire policy and contract between the insured and the Com- pany. In interpreting any provision of this policy, this policy shall be construed as a whole. (b) Any claim of loss or damage, whether or not based on negligence, and which arises out of the status of the title to the estate or interest covered hereby or by any action asserting such claim, shall be restricted to this policy. (c) No amendment of or endorsement to this policy can be made except by a writing endorsed hereon or attached hereto signed by either the President, a Vice President, the Secretary, an Assistant Secretary, or validating officer or authorized signatory of the Company. 16. SEVERABILITY. In the event any provision of the policy is held invalid or unenforceable under applicable law, the policy shall be deemed not to include that provision and all other provisions shall remain in full force and effect. 17. NOTICES, WHERE SENT. All notices required to be given.the Company and any statement in writing required to be furnished the Company shall include the number. of this policy and shall be addressed to the Company at P.O. Box 2029, Houston, Texas 77252 -2029. L E GUARA YTY f'UMI'ANl' C C cwt t1J d.L,. S'I, EAa'A R 91 '1' I t�; aU CS CQ J L E GUARA YTY f'UMI'ANl' C C cwt t1J d.L,. S'I, EAa'A R 91 '1' I 0 10 z 1 Q frs Z , W5 Q �J., yes z . ................ ................ P4, Sanuil-1, of (onlam �.STEWART TITLE GUARANTY COMPANY P. 0. Box 2029 qL�ston, Texas 77252 POLICY OF TITLE INSURANCE Lu ix! Lu C POLICY OF TITLE INSURANCE 1. R 3 4. SCHEDULE A FILE NO. POLICY NUMBER DATE OF POLICY December 19, 2001 @ 92:56:00 PM 5 -01 -0995 0 -2125- 374268 Name of Insured: 1504 Garden Inc. The estate or interest in the !and which is covered by this Policy is: Fee Simple Title to the estate or interest in the land is vested the Insured. 1504 Garden Inc. The land referred to.in this policy is described as follows: See Attached Continuation Owner's Policy A AMOUNT OF INSURANCE $ 375,000.00 0 ZUO c��y GF Cl Ens ffr, E co CV sC U WC L For Company reference Purposes Only According to insured representation or vesting instrument(s), the street address of the property is: Street Name: 1504 N. Garden Avenue City /State /Zip: Clearwater, Florida 33755 County: Pinellas Pin /Tax //: 09- 29 -15- 55530- 000 -0050 The Company does not represent or insure the above address is accurate S T E W A R T T I T L E REG. D 0012 Rev. 11 -91 "NOT VALID WITHOUT SCHEDULE B" 203 -A -T (100M 2 -85) K] • Attached to and made a part of Stewart Title Guaranty Company Policy No. Continuation of Schedule A Parcel 1 0- 2125 - 374268 Lots 5, 6 and 7 of E.A. Marshall's Subdivision, together with the easterly 5 feet of the alley (now vacated) lying immediately West of said Lots 5, 6 and 7, according to map or plat recorded in Plat Book 7, Page 17, of the Public Records of Hillsborough County, Florida, of which Pinellas County was formerly a part: LESS AND EXCEPT that portion of said Ltos 5, 6 and 7, lying Easterly of the West right -of -way line of Garden Avenue. TOGETHER WITH the following: Commence at the intersection of the North boundary of Lot 3 of LESLEY'S SUBDIVISION as recorded on February 4, 1884, in Deed Book K, Page 471, of the Public Records of Hillsborough County, Florida, of which Pinellas County was formerly a part, with the West right -of -way line of Garden Avenue as it is presently occupied; thence North 88 014'34" West, (basis of bearings is assumed) along the North boundary of said Lot 3, a distance of 72.69 feet; thence South 06 °04'06" West, along the.Southerly extension of the centerline of a vacated 10 foot alley lying West of Lots 5, 6, and 7 and East of Lots 8, 9 and 10, E.A. Marshall's Subdivision, as recorded in Plat Book•7, Page 17, of the Public Records of Hillsborough County, Florida, of which Pinellas County was formerly a part, 15.02 feet; thence South 81014`34" East, 15.00 feet Southerly of and parallel to the North boundary of said Lot 3, a distance of 70.62 feet; thence North 13 057'36" East, along the West right of way line of Garden Avenue, 15.06 feet to the Point of Beginning. 'i Ifs Parcel 2 Co c Lot 10 of E.A. Marshall's Subdivision, according to the map or`Pi. plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 7, Page 17, of the Public``!' Records of Hillsborough County, Florida, of which Pinellas ° County was formerly a part W u.. AND The North 50.15 feet of the West 5 feet of a certain vacated 10 _ foot alley running along the East line of Lot 10 of E.A. Marshall's Subdivision, according to the map or plat thereof as reorded in Plat Book 7, Page 17, of the Public Records of Hillsborough County, Florida, of which Pinellas County was /NA RECTIrED 04 2008 4 � Page PlANI41- DEPA r��.d�UNT .STEWART TITLE GUARANTY COMPANY Attached to and made apart of Stewart Title Guaranty Company Policy No. 0-2125-374268 Continuation of Schedule A formerly a part. 1,ZE.0 FE 3 (94 2008 rg Page 203 -A -T STEWART TITLE (100M2-85) GUARANTY COMPANY zh N IV3. Page 203 -A -T STEWART TITLE (100M2-85) GUARANTY COMPANY C • Attached to and made apart of Stewart Title Guaranty Company Policy No. 0-2125-374268 Continuationof Schedule B 15. Encroachment of fence onto subject property in alley; curb & gutter onto subject property at the northeasterly corner; concrete walk into right.of way for Fort Harrison Avenue; concrete parking area into the right of way for Marshall Street as shown on survey prepared by David L. Smith, dated 11/26/01. Page 203 -A -T STEWART TITLE (100M2-85) GUARANTY COMPANY ,gam 04 2090 1 LU Page 203 -A -T STEWART TITLE (100M2-85) GUARANTY COMPANY ALTA OWNER'S POLICY { • Policy Number: 0 -2125- 374268 File No: 5 -01 -0995 SCHEDULEB REM MW, This policy does not insure against loss or damage by reason of the following: 0 4 2006 1. Rights or claims of parties in possession not shown by the public records.etr 2. Easements, or claims of easements, not shown by the public records. 3. Encroachments, overlaps, boundary line disputes, or other matters which would be disclosed by an accurate survey or inspection of the premises. 4. Any lien, or right to a lien, for services, labor or material heretofore or hereafter furnished, imposed by law and not shown by the public records. 5. Community property, dower, curtesy, survivorship, or homestead rights, if any, of any spouse of the insured. 6. Any titles or rights asserted by anyone including but not limited to persons, corporations, governments or other entities, to tide lands, or lands comprising the shores or bottoms of navigable rivers, lakes, bays ocean or gulf, or lands beyond the line of the harbor or bulkhead lines as established or changed by the United States Government or water rights, if any. 7. Taxes for the year 2002 and thereafter, if any, not recorded in the public records. Folio /Pin No: 09- 29 -15- 55530 - 000 -0050 8. Mortgage executed by 1504 Garden Inc. to Abdelmaged Mustafa Ahmed dated December 3, 2001 and recorded December 19, 2001 in Official Record Book 11741, page 1714 of the Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida, given to secure the principal sum of $309,435.33. 9. Any lien provided by Chapter 159, Florida Statutes, in favor of any city, town, village, or port authority for unpaid service charges for Sertri r_+a }hy any waiter cyst tins; sewer systems or gas systems serving the lands described herein. 10. Matters as set forth in that certain resolution recorded Juy 23, 1942, in Deed Book 1186, Page 538, of the Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida. 11. Existing nrecorded leases and all right thereunder of the lessees -_� - -= - g g and of any person claiming by, through or under the lessees and any ;k. tenants in posession. N 12. Federal Tax Lien recorded in O.R. Book 11354, Page 339, Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida. !..4 13. Mortgage executed by Abdelmaged Mustafa Ahmed in favor of Bank of America, N.A. dated August 24, 1999 and recorded September 15, 1999 in O.R. Book 10659, Page 1715, in the original amount of $39,153.00, of the Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida. 14. Mortgage executed by Abdelmaged M. Ahmed and Gail Ahmed, husband and wife to Delaware Savings Bank, dated November 25, 1997 and recorded December 10, 1997 in O.R. Book 9930 Page 1543, in the original amount of $82,000.00 and recorded in the the Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida. See Attached Continuation Owner's Policy B Exceptions numbered 1, 3 and 4 are hereby deleted from the Owners Policy. f d t Alday - Donalson Title Agencies of America, Inc. 11103 North 56th Street Temple Terrace, FL 33617 Phone: (813) 988 -2836 Fax: (813) 989 -3647 May 1, 2002 1504 Garden Inc. Attn: Hashim Sullaiman 1504 N. Garden Avenue Clearwater, Florida 33755 RE: L 5, 6 & 7, E.A. Marshall's Subd, Bk 7, Pg 17 OUR FILE NO.: 5 -01 -0995 Dear Hashim Sullaiman, In connection with the purchase of the above referenced property, please find the following enclosed: x RECORDED DEED OF TRANSFER x OWNERS TITLE INSURANCE POLICY ADDITIONAL ENCLOSURES: it has been a pleasure to be of service to you. If you have any questions or need further assistance, please call. Very truly yours, Alday- Donalson Title Title Policy Department enc. RIGNIIA r ECAT FEE 04 2008 Ir ;f �y C)" CIE -,. `A,`ATER o N U) z O U H Z_ Ix O tL w D w U7 Cr w w Cr w w Cn DIANE NELSON, CiFCi NOTICE OF AD VALOREM TAXES AND NON -AD VALOREM ASSESSMENTS PINELLAS COUNTY TAX COLLECT �wtaxcollect.com 2009 R EtSTATE TAX PAY IN U.S. FUNDS TO DIANE NELSOAI W COLLECTOR • P.O. BOX 10832 • CLEARVI i FL 33757 -8832 • (727) 464 -7777 Please Pay RKED BY I $3 532.70009 $3 569 0009 I $3 606.30 10 I $3 643.10010 $3,679.90010 ACCOUNT NUMBER ESCROW CODE MILLAGE CODE 01-99902 1504 GARDEN INC 1504 N GARDEN AVE CLEARWATER FL 33755 -2432 I_1 _DL PARCEL NO: 09/29/15/55530/000 /0100 SITE ADDRESS: 1505 N FT HARRISON AVE PLAT: OH7 PAGE: 017 LEGAL: MARSHALL'S, E.A. SUB LOT 10 & W 1/2 OF VAC ALLEY ON E GENERAL FUND 4.8108 175,000 0 175,000 841.89 HEALTH DEPARTMENT .0622 175,000 0 175,000 10.89 EMS .5832 175,000 0 175,000 102.06 SCHOOL -STATE LAW 5.3480 175,000 0 175,000 935.90 SCHOOL -LOCAL BD. 2.9980 175,000 0 175,000 524.65 CLEARWATER 5.1550 175,000 0 175,000 902.13 SW FLA WTR MGMT. .3866 175,000 0 175,000 67.66 PINELLAS ANCLOTE .3200 175,000 0 175,000 56.00 PINELLAS COUNTY PLN.CNCL. .0125 175,000 0 175,000 2.19 JUVENILE WELFARE BOARD .7915 175,000 0 175,000 138.51 SUNCOAST TRANSIT AUTH. .5601 175,000 0 175,000 98.02 TOTAL MILLAGE 21.0279 GROSS AD VALOREM TAXES $3,679.90 NON -AD VALOREM ASSESSMENTS AUTHORITY LEVYING RATE AMID GROSS NON -AD VALOREM ASSESSMENTS TAXES BECOME DELINQUENT APRIL 1ST COMBINED GROSS TAXES AND ASSESSMENTS $3,679.90 PLEASE RETAIN TOP PORTION FOR YOUR RECORDS r_� k p . I O s 4 ut .7 ` SpLa 2/4/2008 wlo Receipt #: 1200800000000001002 2:59:32PM y �= Date: 02/04/2008 T Line Items: Case No Tran Code Description Revenue Account No Amount Paid FLD2008 -02005 04 Flexible Commercial 010 - 341262 1,205.00 FLD2008 -02005 Fire - Prelim Site Plan 010- 342501 200.00 Line Item Total: $1,405.00 • Payments: Method Payer Initials Check No Confirm No How Received Amount Paid Check 1504 GARDEN INC R D 1396 In Person 1,405.00 Payment Total: $1,405.00 THIS IS NOT A PERMIT. This is a receipt for an application for a permit. This application will be reviewed and you will be notified as to the outcome of the application. Page 1 of 1 cReceipt.rpt • • FLD2008 -02005 503 MARSHALL ST MARSHALL BUILDING PLANNER OF RECORD: WW ATLAS # 268B ZONING: C LAND USE: CG RECEIVED: 02/04/2008 INCOMPLETE: COMPLETE: MAPS: PHOTOS: STAFF REPORT: DRC: CDB: CLW CoverSheet u � ;f1P,LA'N'NIN'G & rDi LOPM�E{NT DEPART <MENT a 11r00'>S'�dvlY�2TL �/ °E AENh #2NO :FLOOR N {BUR' K;CL�RK;OF�tCOURT 4 ° `�PINELU1SaCOUNT1ffLORIDA >; °' !1 '9 {' : CLEARWATER .*FL 33756 w k ` )' lI1NST# �2010331111s1/23/2Q10 a15 04 3211PM , 'tom PHONE 727 562.- 4'567;'FAX: 727 -562 -4865 ; oFFtlRe�cpeK `'w7o9s;I�PG;t;'�s9's' (Revised 05.04.2010) 'DocType AGMiIRECORDING147$ 18 DE.GLARATI J WE �Pao�o- og3�lo Property Owner: 1504 Garden Inc. ° JAN 2 6 Zo�� Property Address: 503 Marshall Street L! "Vt�LAPM€�I' SIVi01~8 IIPT KNOW OF ALL ,MEN BY. THESE PRESE S t�h- iul;� ma ces of the Ctty, of Clearwater perkat i ig'i the �issuanoe ! ofrbuildin'g sperm tsj and;regulating la eve opmen 1 ' tivihes, ;the unde&gn&d;,.being the fee owners) of they follow n'gt desc'rtbed` re�aT property (tnsett below or attach legal descrtpttori) situated "in the City'of Cle 'arwater, Co "unty prPmellas and State' of FI'ori da to wit: ' { See - Attached' Exhibit "A" do hdAy.ma&e:.the following declaration of conditions, limitations and restrictions on said lands, hereafter to be known aid referred fo as a DECLARATION OF UNITY OF TITLE, as to the following particulars: 1. That the aforesaid pllot or„ combination of separ Lie lots, ,plots parcels, acreage or portions thereof, shall hereafter; be regarded as,arid is hereby declaredto' be unified under one title as an indtvtstble building., site. i 2. That flit"' id property shall,henceforthibe considered as one plot or parcel f land, and that no portion is of Z � � i r( t ' C I -3 .. � -' 5 ( � � thereof'shall { be rysold, assigned, transferred, conveyed or devised separately except in- its enttre'ty, 'as one ptot or_paicelt,o�f'�land . , 3. That;ths Declaration; of Unity of Title shall constitute a covenant to run. with the land, as provided by law, and shall be I in ing upon. the undersigned, and the heirs, successors. and ;assigns of the undersigned, and ahtparties claiming under them until such time as the same -may zbe,teleased m wr ting;under: the order of the Ctty Manager of't, e City of Clearwater. The undersigned also agrees) that .this instrument shall be recorded in the :public- records of Pinellas County, Florida. Signed,: sealed; :witnessed and. acknowledged this of 3 2b day of /Vd V L° Yh 15 f.P_, , 2010, at Clearwater, Florida. WITNESSES: OWNER (S): IDPeSi // - r Su Lie Adde!1--- OF 4011, 14 0114 '00" Notary PubUC State of Florida �i � ;Jean Pe'eke My Comsion QD833489 mis z Ex6in35 `12/25/2012 this c23#0 day of c!141 rhAA) on Notary Commission Number: D P 9 3 3 1 49 (SEAL ABOVE) Personally known or prod 4d identifi on Type of identification produced iture nted Exhibit "A" 503 Marshall Street LOT 10 OF EA MARSHALL'S' SUBDIVISION; ACCORDING TO THE, MAP DR :PLAT THEREOF AS'RECORDE] ?,IN PLAT „;BOOK. 7, WE :1,7,, OF,,TH, E ;PUBLIC : RECORDS OF HILLSBOROUGH -...COUNTY,, OF WHICH PINELLAS COUNTY WAS FORMERLY APART. AND THE NORTH 50.15 FEET. OF THE WEST 5. FEET. OF A CERTAIN VACATED 10 FOOT ALL RUNNING ALONG THE EAST LINE Q ;LOT ;LO OF . E.A. ,MARSHALL'S SUBDNISION, .ACCORDING I TO:: THE MAP �.OR PLAT THEREOF AS,-RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 7,; ,PAGB 17, ,;OF THE PUBLIC. RECORD'S OF HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY, FLORIDA,, OF WHICH PINELLAS COUNTY WAS FORMERLY A PART. LL } rwater U FET P Fax Cover Memo, CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, 2ND FLOOR CLEARWATER, FL 33756 (727) 562 -4567 FAX: (727).562-4865 TO: �n i v� DATE: �J Z 0 FAX: ?j 3 - 33 _ 3 TELEPHONE: (0) 1 o -71 Z FROM: Wayne M. Wells TELEPHONE: (727) 562 -4504 SUBJECT: cam �/ MESSAGE: r 1�se—q 'j� � Z- 45 ka 77 NUMBER OF SHEETS (INCLUDING THIS PAGE): Z- Permit Plan Procedures of Clearwater Requirements for submittal 1. Building permit application per structure 2. Recorded NOC (over $2,500.00) 3. Three copies of property survey of structure being demolish 4. Letter of authorization from property owner 5. Clearing & Grubbing application 6. Tree or No Tree Removal application • DEMOLITION - RESIDENTIAL ➢ The sewer must be cut & cap and it requires to be permitted separate by a license plumber. ➢ Cut and Cap permit must be completed prior to the issuance of demo permit. ➢ DRT's is responsible to email the City of Clearwater utilities departments. ➢ All requirements, reviews and fees apply to all city ordered demo's If the property is deem unsafe, only a contractor can pull the demo permit Trades: ■ Building ■ Clearing & Grubbing Reviews: ■ Engineering • Clearing & Grubbing • Land Resource Inspections: ■ (802) Demo Final • Traffic 2� /i/ 1, • Tree Removal • No Tree Removal Fee's: ■ Demo Fee determined bv square maximum of $1 000.00 • Clearing & Grubbing Fee • Tree Removal Fee (if applicable) The permit may be obtained by the following: • State Certified General (CGC) • State Certified Building Contractor (CBC) • State Certified Residential Contractor (CRC) • Pinellas County Demo Contractor • Homeowner (except for permit of an unsafe structure) Project Name Box: Add the Business or owners name Description Box: Add the description of the project indicated by the applicant 1) Choose a description ---- that fits the project the best 2) Click on Residential tab — 3) Choose the best description of the property for the existing and proposed use 4) Choose the 645 Cens.as.coc Name:CITY OF ftdrlsss 100 S W 4TER E, iject: XXXXXXX -X) Type of Permit: Inspector Comments: Demolition . Building r- Residential /Commerial: Residential Existina Use: Proposed Use: Units: Stories: Census: Bin -14- Updated: 1/11/2008 JAC Master,` : BCP2007 -09229 Permit Dates Date Received: 9/13/2007 Target Date: F Comments Sent Date: F — Date Issued: F— Date Finaled: F— Date Expired: I— General 2 Type of York Fence R01,7 . _. Zoning Tree Directions PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT 9 CITY OF r CLEARWATER POST OFFICE Box 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758 -4748 MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562 -4567 FAX (727) 562 -4865 April 21, 2010 Hashim Sulliaman 1504 Garden Inc. 1504 N. Garden Avenue Clearwater, FL 33755 RE: Development Order — Case No. FLD2008 -02005 503 Marshall Street Dear Mr. Sulliaman: This letter constitutes a Development Order pursuant to Section 4- 206.D.6 of the Community Development Code. On April 20, 2010, the Community Development Board reviewed your Flexible Development application to permit a Mixed Use (1,610 square feet of Retail Sales and Services on the first floor and one Attached Dwelling on the second floor) in the Commercial (C) District with a lot area of 7,720 square feet, a lot width of 50.81 feet along N. Ft. Harrison Avenue (west) and 149.95 feet along Marshall Street (north), a front (west) setback of 14.6 feet (to pavement), a front (north) setback of 18 feet (to building), eight feet (to sidewalk) and 4.96 feet (to pavement); a side (east) setback of 0.4 feet (to existing building) and 12.93 feet (to pavement), a side (south) setback of one -foot (to existing building) and zero feet (to pavement), a building height of 31 feet (to top of decorative tower) and 10 parking spaces, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project under the provisions of Community Development Code (CDC) Section 2- 704.C; as well as a north landscape buffer width along Marshall Street of 4.96 feet (to pavement), an east landscape buffer width of 0.4 feet (to existing building), a south landscape buffer width of zero feet (to pavement) and a north foundation landscape width of four feet, as a Comprehensive Landscape Program under the provisions of CDC Section 3- 1202.G. The Community Development Board (CDB) APPROVED the application with the following Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and Conditions of Approval: Findings of Fact: 1. The 0.18 acres located at the southeast corner of North Ft. Harrison Avenue and Marshall Street; 2. The subject property is currently developed with a two -story commercial building (presently vacant) on the eastern portion of the site and an attached dwelling building (duplex — presently vacant) on the western portion of the site; 3. The only existing parking area for this site is north of the two -story commercial building, which requires vehicles to back into Marshall Street; 4. Code Compliance issues were initiated for this site on February 5, 2003, when a Stop Work Order was issued for unpermitted demolition and construction within the two -story commercial building (CDC2003- 00559, which is still an active case); M r "EmAI. EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATNF. ACTION E.MPi.OYRR" • April 21, 2010 Sullaiman — Page 2 • 5. On January 18, 2005, the Community Development Board (CDB) approved Case FLD2004 -02010 with nine conditions of approval for the subject property, permitting retail sales and service uses on both floors of this commercial building and included 11 required parking spaces on the parcel directly south of this site at 1411 N. Ft. Harrison Avenue; 6. Building Permit BCP2005 -06914 was submitted June 25, 2005, to facilitate the remodeling of the building and to construct the site improvements, but this permit was never issued and was voided October 24, 2006; 7. The applicant also lost the 11 required parking spaces on the adjacent parcel due to proposed redevelopment of that parcel (1411 N. Ft. Harrison Avenue); 8. This current application was filed February 4, 2008, in a second attempt to resolve the Code Compliance issue through the approval of an appropriate mix of use for the property; 9. The proposal is to demolish the duplex attached dwelling building on the west side of the site and permit, as a Mixed Use, a retail sales and service use of 1,610 square feet on the first floor and one attached dwelling on the second floor; 10. Many potential uses have been analyzed for this site, with the proposed mixed use the best fit for the site, which is part of the reason for the length of time this application has been in the development review process; 11. The proposal includes setback and perimeter buffer reductions from all property lines; 12. The proposal includes a front (west) setback of 14.6 feet (to pavement), a front (north) setback of 18 feet (to building), eight feet (to sidewalk) and 4.96 feet (to pavement), a side (east) setback of 0.4 feet (to existing building) and 12.93 feet (to pavement) and a side (south) setback of one -foot (to existing building) and zero feet (to pavement); 13. The existing building has a building height of 23.5 feet to the flat roof deck; 14. The proposal includes the construction of a decorative tower at an overall height of 31 feet over the entrance to the ratnil calPc 1NCP to giyP the I-III' ling 6CAInl interegt; 15. Based on the proposed uses, 10 parking spaces are required and have been provided on -site; and 16. There is an active Code Compliance issue associated with this subject property for unpermitted remodeling of the two -story commercial building. Conclusions of Law: 1. That the development proposal is consistent with the Standards as per Tables 2 -701.1 and 2 -704 of the Community Development Code; 2. That the development proposal is consistent with the Flexibility criteria as per Section 2 -704.0 of the Community Development Code; and 3. That the development proposal is consistent with the General Standards for Level Two Approvals as per Section 3 -913 of the Community Development Code. Conditions of Approval: 1. That application for a building permit to construct the approved project be submitted no later than December 20, 2010. Failure to submit for these permits within this time frame shall cause this Flexible Development approval by the CDB to be null and void and cause compliance action to be initiated; 2. That, prior to the issuance of any permits, a Declaration of Unity of Title be approved and recorded in the public records; That use of the building be for a retail sales and services use on the first floor and one attached dwelling on the second floor; 0 0 April 21, 2010 Sullaiman — Page 3 4. That the final design and color of the building be consistent with the elevations approved by the CDB; 5. That freestanding signage be limited to monument -style signs, be a maximum height of six feet and be consistent with the color and materials of the building; 6. That electric and communication lines on -site be placed underground; 7. That, prior to the issuance of any permits, appropriate agreements with the City and the abutting property owner be approved and recorded, as necessary, to allow tenants of this site to share the dumpster on the property to the east. Additionally, prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy /Completion for this site, the off -site dumpster shall be upgraded to meet City requirements for design and location; 8. That, prior to the issuance of the building permit, the location and visibility of electric equipment (electric panels, boxes and meters) be reviewed and, if located exterior to the building where visible from adjacent roadways or properties, be painted the same color as the building; 9. That, prior to the issuance of a building permit, outside mechanical equipment be reviewed for Code requirements for location and screening; and 10. That, prior to the issuance of any permit, all requirements of the General Engineering, Environmental Engineering, Stormwater Engineering, Traffic Engineering and Fire Departments be addressed. Pursuant to Section 4 -407, an application for a building permit shall be made according to the time frame listed under Condition of Approval #1 above (December 20, 2010). All required certificates of occupancy shall be obtained within two years of the date of issuance of the initial building permit. The building permit must be obtained within six months of the initial permit application. This timeframe to obtain the initial building permit may be extended for an additional six months for cause by the Community Development Coordinator. Time frames do not change with successive owners. The Community Development Coordinator may grant an extension of time for the Flexible Development approval for a period not to exceed one year and only within the original period of validity. The issuance of this Development Order does not relieve you of the necessity to obtain any building permits or pay any impact fees that may be required. In order to facilitate the issuance of any permit or license affected by this approval, please bring a copy of this letter with you when applying for any permits or licenses that require this prior development approval. Additionally, an appeal of a Level Two approval (Flexible Development) may be initiated pursuant to Section 4 -502.13 by the applicant or by any person granted party status within 14 days of the date of the CDB meeting. The filing of an application/notice of appeal shall stay the effect of the decision pending the final determination of the case. The appeal period for your case expires on May 5, 2010 (14 days from the date of the CDB meeting). If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Planner III, at 727 -562- 4504. You can access zoning information for parcels within the City through our website: www.mvclea_rwa.ter.com /go% %,/d in s;'p_Iatln ng. Sincerely Michael Delk, AICP Planning and Development Director S: (Planning DepartnientlC D BTLEX (FLD)Unactive or Finished ApplicationsWarshall 503 Marshall Building (C) 2010.04 -Approved - WWIMarshall 503 Development Order 4.2/.10. doe F/ 0 Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Monday, April 19, 2010 5:23 PM To: 'hsullaiman @aol.com' Cc: Ipressinc @aol.com' Subject: FLD2008 -02005 - 503 Marshall Street Hashim — • Attached is the memorandum that I will hand out to the CDB tomorrow with the change in the time frame in Condition #1. See you at 1:00 pm at City Hall tomorrow. Wayne M. Wells, AICP Planner III City of Clearwater 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, FL 33756 -5520 Phone: 727 - 562 -4504 Fax: 727 - 562 -4865 uff� Memo to CDB - evised Conditio 0 0 Wells, Wayne From: hsullaiman @aol.com Sent: Monday, April 19, 2010 3:54 PM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: Re: FLD2008 -02005 - 503 Marshall Street except but I might need more time to submit for construction permits. I am afraid the engineer will require extra time. Can you explane condition # 2 Hashim Thanks - - - -- Original Message--- - From: Wayne.Wells @myClearwater.com To: Pressinc @aol.com Cc: hsullaiman @aol.com Sent: Mon, Apr 19, 2010 1:36 pm Subject: FLD2008 -02005 - 503 Marshall Street Todd / Hashim — I was out sick for two days at the end of last week. I apologize for the staff report not getting to you earlier, but is attached. Please let me know as soon as possible, but no later than the end of today, whether the conditions of approval are acceptable or not. If they are acceptable, your application will be placed on the Consent portion of the agenda (ps: it will be the only one on the Consent portion, as there are only two case on the entire agenda). Thanks. Wayne M. Wells, AICP Planner III City of Clearwater 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, FL 33756 -5520 Phone: 727 - 562 -4504 Fax: 727 - 562 -4865 <<Marshall 503 Staff Report.docx>> 1-1 Wells, Wayne From: Presslnc @aol.com Sent: Monday, April 19, 2010 3:51 PM To: Wells, Wayne Cc: hsullaiman @aol.com Subject: Re: FLD2008 -02005 - 503 Marshall Street • Hashim does not really have me working on this at this point - but I have spoken with him directly today to make him aware of what you need here - I told him it needs to be done asap. Thanks In a message dated 4/19/2010 1:36:26 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, Wayne.Wells (aa-)myClearwater.com writes: Todd / Hashim — I was out sick for two days at the end of last week. I apologize for the staff report not getting to you earlier, but is attached. Please let me know as soon as possible, but no later than the end of today, whether the conditions of approval are acceptable or not. If they are acceptable, your application will be placed on the Consent portion of the agenda (ps: it will be the only one on the Consent portion, as there are only two case on the entire agenda). Thanks. Wayne M. Wells, AICP Planner III City of Clearwater 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, FL 33756 -5520 Phone: 727 - 562 -4504 Fax: 727 - 562 -4865 <<Marshall 503 Staff Report.docx>> Todd Pressman Pressman & Associates, Inc. Governmental and Public Affairs P.O. Box 6015 Palm Harbor, FL 34684 727 - 804 -1760 Fx. (888) 977 -1179 E-MAIL Pressinc anaol.Com 1� Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Monday, April 19, 2010 1:36 PM To: 'Presslnc @aol.com' Cc: 'hsullaiman @aol.com' Subject: FLD2008 -02005 - 503 Marshall Street Todd /Hashim — 0 was out sick for two days at the end of last week. I apologize for the staff report not getting to you earlier, but is attached: Please let me know as soon as possible, but no later than the end of today, whether the conditions of approval are acceptable or not. If they are acceptable, your application will be placed on the Consent portion of the agenda (ps: it will be the only one on the Consent portion, as there are only two case on the entire agenda). Thanks. Wayne M. Wells, AICP Planner III City of Clearwater 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, FL 33756 -5520 Phone: 727 - 562 -4504 Fax: 727 - 562 -4865 Marshall 503 .aff Report.docx i Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Tuesday, March 23, 2010 3:38 PM To: 'Presslnc @aol.com' Cc: 'hsullaiman @aol.com' Subject: FLD2008- 02005, 503 Marshall Street Todd /Hashim — • The above referenced application has been scheduled for the April 20, 2010, CDB meeting (see attached letter). A Staff Report for this application will be sent to you no later than April 15, 2010. Should you have any questions, feel free to contact me. Wayne M. Wells, AICP Planner III City of Clearwater 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, FL 33756 -5520 Phone: 727 - 562 -4504 Fax: 727 - 562 -4865 IM Marshall 503 DB Letter 3.23.1 1 PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT 0 0 CITY OF CLEARWATER POST OFFICE BOX 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758 -4748 MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562 -4567 FAx (727) 562 -4865 March 23, 2010 Todd Pressman P.O. Box 6015 Palm Harbor, FL 34684 Re: Community Development Board Meeting (Case No. FLD2008- 02005) Dear Mr. Pressman: You have filed Case No. FLD2008 -02005 for property located generally at 503 Marshall Street for a Flexible Development application to permit a Mixed Use (1,610 square feet of Retail Sales and Services on the first floor and one Attached Dwelling on the second floor) in the Commercial (C) District with a lot area of 7,720 square feet, a lot width of 50.81 feet along N. Ft. Harrison Avenue (west) and 149.95 feet along Marshall Street (north), a front (west) setback of 14.6 feet (to pavement), a front (north) setback of 18 feet (to building), eight feet (to sidewalk) and 4.96 feet (to pavement), a side (east) setback of 0.4 feet (to existing building) and 12.93 feet (to pavement), a side (south) setback of one -foot (to existing building) and zero feet (to pavement), a building height of 31 feet (to top of decorative tower) and 10 parking spaces, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project under the provisions of Community Development Code (CDC) Section 2- 704.C; as well as a north landscape buffer width along Marshall Street of 4.96 feet (to pavement), an east landscape buffer width of 0.4 feet (to existing building), a south landscape buffer width of zero feet (to pavement) and a north foundation landscape width of four feet, as a Comprehensive Landscape Program under the provisions of CDC Section 3- 1202.G. This case has been scheduled for review by the Community Development Board on April 20, 2010. The meeting will take place at 1:00 p.m. in the City Council Chambers, 3rd floor of City Hall at 112 S. Osceola Avenue, Clearwater. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call me at 727 -562- 4504. G e ly, M. Wells, AICP Planner III S: (Planning DepartmentIC D BIFLEX (FLD)IPending cases)Up for the next CDBIMnrshall 503 Marshall Building (C) 2010.04 - 4.20.10 CDB - WWIMa shall 503 CDB Letter 3.23.10.doc �y "Fool. EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACT(I)N F.MPI.0YF.R":t, i 0 Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Wednesday, February 24, 2010 1:54 PM To: 'Presslnc @aol.com'; 'hsullaiman @aol.com' Cc: Tefft, Robert; Watkins, Sherry; Doherty, Steve; Rice, Scott; Vo, Phuong Subject: FLD2008 -02005 - 503 Marshall St Todd /Hashim — Drainage is still an issue with this application (see comments below). As such, your application is not being placed on the March 16, 2010, CDB agenda. Please have your engineer get with our Engineering Department staff to resolve the drainage issues. Resolution may affect the landscaping design (where I am the reviewer). I would appreciate it if this can be resolved soon, such that revised plans, compliant to the City's comments, can be resubmitted no later than March 15, 2010. Only those pages of the application (written material and drawings) that are revised must be resubmitted (changed out in the CDB packages that we have; one original and 14 copies of the original) by this March 15`h date. If acceptable, this would place the application on the April 20, 2010, CDB agenda. Wayne From: Doherty, Steve Sent: Wednesday, February 24, 2010 11:06 AM �To: Wells, Wayne Cc: Vo, Phuong; Rice, Scott Subject: RE: FLD2008 -02005 - 503 Marshall St -My review of the resubmittal leads me to conclude the following: 1. The pond design as described in the stormwater calculations cannot fit into the land lying adjacent to Ft. Harrison Ave. 2:, If the pond area was maximized within the land adjacent to Ft. Harrison Ave., with maximum side slope of 4:1, it appears that volume would be insufficient to meet 25 year storm event. 3.- Storm structure to which pond is to be connected is not described or shown on the plan. 4. Control structure is not shown on the plan. It is likely a retaining wall would need to be constructed on the parking lot side of the pond in order to meet minimum volume requirement. Until we have a plan showing a feasible solution to this issue the Engineering Dept. cannot support this item going forward to CDB. From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Wednesday, February 24, 2010 7:55 AM To: Doherty, Steve Cc: Vo, Phuong Subject: FLD2008 -02005 - 503' Marshall St Steve — Revised application material has been submitted for the above referenced application. I need to get the CDB agenda to the Clerk's office this morning. Could you please look at this ASAP? I have placed one copy on the cabinets outside Rm 216 for your review. Let me know if okay or not okay. Thanks. Wayne M. Wells, AICP 0 • Planner III City of Clearwater 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, FL 33756 -5520 Phone: 727 - 562 -4504 Fax: 727 - 562 -4865 • Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Monday, February 22, 2010 3:59 PM To: 'Robin Rebeck' Subject: Marshall St This is fine as written. Thanks. - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Robin Rebeck [ mailto :rrebeck�latampabay.rr.com] Sent: Monday, February 22, 2010 3:23 PM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: Marshall St • Feel free to redline anything. If I don't have this come back to me I'll be a happy camper! Please let me know you received this and if everything is ok. I need to fax this to Hashim tonight. Thanks alot Robin Rebeck 1 E ft G 1 n E E R S 0 MET FIN LLC, EB # 9746, M.727-429-4788 FAX 813 -972 -2846 E -MAIL: SONEYFMLLC @YANOO.COM WM SON 16306 Doune Ct., Tampa FI, 33647 F.P.E. # 47431 6. Still need to address "d ". (Prior comment: Sheet C1 /7 - Revise the Site Data for the following: d. Proposed setbacks - This is a corner lot where there are two front setbacks (north and west) and two side setbacks (south and east). Provide Proposed Setbacks for both Front setbacks (north and west) and for both Side setbacks (south and east). Include proposed setbacks to building and to pavement;) RESPONSE: Revised. 7. Still need to address comment "d" below. (Prior comment: Sheets C4/7 & C7/7 - Sheets are not coordinated as to window, door and tower addition: d. Sheets C4/7 and C7/7 - Ensure the door on the first floor and the window above the door on the second floor are located properly on the west facade consistent with the floor plan. (Sheet C7/7 - Door on first floor on west side not centered - see Sheet C4/7)) RESPONSE: Revised. 8. Need to attach legal description to application. (Prior comment: Page 1 of the Application - Provide (fill in) the Legal Description (or state "see attached" and attach the legal description to the application) and the Proposed Use.) RESPONSE: Attached. 9. Still need to address "b" and "c" below. (Prior comment: Response to Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria #1 - b. Need to address HOW the proposed uses of retail sales and one residential unit cannot fit onto this site without deviations; c. While this is being processed as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, need to compare the proposal to the retail sales standards for setbacks, building height and parking, especially in light of reductions to the standards (or increase for building height), in detail; and) RESPONSE: Revised. 10. Unclear if the recorded Access, Egress and Usage Agreement - Waste Dumpster is acceptable to the Solid Waste Department. It was recorded in January 2009. RESPONSE: N /A. 11. Need to submit 8.5" x 11" copies of Sheets C2/7, C5/7 and C7/7 (colored elevations) RESPONSE: Submitted. Should you have any questions in this matter, please contact us. •rt0e6fflfff QVp,�A A GOB . vv Sinc .el` G E N D( oR,9 y" MV40joel,V*�,W. E-F,•':`. S, L L w ��zo�o • 4,4, ti ?lteffe,.. � U f1r J • R E it G 1 n E E a 5 • MET F■ LL9, EB # 9746, PH: 727 -426 -4786 FAN 813 -972 -2846 E -MAIL: SONEYFMLLC @YANOO.COM WWW. SONEYFMLLC.COM 16306 Doune Ct., Tampa Fl, 33647 F.P.E. # 47431 FLD2008 -02005 — 503 Marshall Street Stormwater Engineering 1. Pond slope is not 4:1 on plans as indicated in the response. RESPONSE: Pond dimensions revised to maintain 4:1 slope. 2. Connection to a storm inlet is required; pond doesn't have enough volume to handle a 50 -year storm event. RESPONSE: Connection to a storm inlet is provided. Pond is designed to handle 25 years storm event. 50 years storm event is not required, as inlet connection has been provided,. 3. No reduced 8.5" x 11" colored elevations submitted. Sheet C7/7 - West facade now shows a yellow area along the base rather than tan. Revise to tan on the colored elevations (both the 24 "06" and the reduced 8.5 "x 11 "). RESPONSE: Revised. 4. Submit paint samples /swatches for the proposed exterior colors. RESPONSE: Submitted. 5. Still need to address "a" and "c" below. Unclear of what the 5.86 dimension at the NW corner of the western parking area is measured to. (Prior comment: Sheet C2/7 - Provide dimensions for the following: a. Since additional wall extensions are being added to the north (two locations - east and west) and the west walls of the building, show such-building extensions and the new dimensions from the property lines; c. Dimension from the Marshall Street property line to the sidewalk to the dwelling unit (see other Planning comments);) RESPONSE: Revised. Landscaping 1. Comprehensive Landscape Program application submitted. Narrative not submitted. (Prior comment: Provide a narrative with this application, detailing what the landscape requirements are, the reductions requested, the important factors of the landscape design and how this proposed landscape design exceeds the minimum Code requirements in areas of the site where the minimum Code is not -�- bein g met. ) RESPONSE: Narrative has been revised. MMI Zoning o 1. Affidavit to Authorize Agent is not filled in and is not signed by the property owner, although the C=1 notary has attested that Hashim Sullaiman signed the Affidavit. 'gin : M - C*44 W RESPONSE: Affidavit is filled out. co a is Sheet C2/7 the requirement must still be met. Prior comment: 2. Despite the response to comment, q ( Per Section 3 -911, all on -site overhead utility lines must be placed underground with this proposal. t '- °- " t, Provide note that such will be done as part of the construction.) RESPONSE: Revised. 3. No reduced 8.5" x 11" colored elevations submitted. Sheet C7/7 - West facade now shows a yellow area along the base rather than tan. Revise to tan on the colored elevations (both the 24 "06" and the reduced 8.5 "x 11 "). RESPONSE: Revised. 4. Submit paint samples /swatches for the proposed exterior colors. RESPONSE: Submitted. 5. Still need to address "a" and "c" below. Unclear of what the 5.86 dimension at the NW corner of the western parking area is measured to. (Prior comment: Sheet C2/7 - Provide dimensions for the following: a. Since additional wall extensions are being added to the north (two locations - east and west) and the west walls of the building, show such-building extensions and the new dimensions from the property lines; c. Dimension from the Marshall Street property line to the sidewalk to the dwelling unit (see other Planning comments);) RESPONSE: Revised. .► w Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Friday, February 19, 2010 6:39 PM To: press inc @aol.com; 'hsullaiman @aol.com' Cc: Tefft, Robert; Watkins, Sherry Subject: FLD2008 -02005 - 503 Marshall Street Todd & Hashim — The revised application package resubmitted has been reviewed and the following items are still not complied with: Stormwater Engineering 1. Pond slope is not 4:1 on plans as indicated in the response. 2. Connection to a storm inlet is required; pond doesn't have enough volume to handle a 50 -year storm event. Landscaping 1. Comprehensive Landscape Program application submitted. Narrative not submitted. (Prior comment: Provide a narrative with this application, detailing -what the landscape requirements are, the reductions requested, the important factors of the landscape design and how this proposed landscape design exceeds the minimum Code requirements in areas of the site where the minimum Code is not being met.) Zoning 1. Affidavit to Authorize Agent is not filled in and is not signed by the property owner, although the notary has attested that Hashim Sullaiman signed the Affidavit. 2. Despite the response to comment, the requirement must still be met. (Prior comment; Sheet C2/7 - Per Section 3 -911, all on -site overhead utility lines must be placed underground with this proposal. Provide note that such Will be done as part of the construction.) 1 No reduced 8.5" x 11" colored elevations submitted. Sheet C7/7 - West facade now.shows;a:yellow area along the base rather than tan. Revise to tan on the colored elevations (both the 24 "x36" and the reduced 8.5 "x11 "). 4. Submit paint samples /swatches for the proposed exterior colors. 5. Still need to address "a" and "c" below. Unclear of what the 5.86 dimension at the NW corner of the western parking area is measured to. (Prior comment: Sheet C2/7 - Provide dimensions for the following: a. Since additional wall extensions are being added to the north (two locations - east and west) and the west walls of the building, show such building extensions and the new dimensions from the property lines; c. Dimension from the Marshall Street property line to the sidewalk to the dwelling unit (see other Planning comments);) 6. Still need to address "d ". (Prior comment: Sheet C1/7 Revise the Site Data for the following: d. Proposed setbacks - This is a corner lot where there are two front setbacks (north and west) and two side setbacks (south and east). Provide Proposed Setbacks for both Front setbacks (north and west) and for both Side setbacks (south and east). Include proposed setbacks to building and to pavement;) 7. Still need to address comment "d" below. (Prior comment: Sheets C4/7 & C7/7 - Sheets are not coordinated as to window, door and tower addition: d. Sheets C4/7 and C7/7 - Ensure the door on the first floor and the window above the door on the second floor are located properly on the west facade consistent with the floor plan. (Sheet C7/7 - Door on first floor on west side not centered - see Sheet C4/7)) 8. Need to attach legal description to application. (Prior comment: Page 1 of the Application - Provide (fill in) the Legal Description (or state "see attached" and attach the legal description to the application) and the Proposed Use.) 9. Still need to address "b" and "c" below. (Prior comment: Response to Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria #1 - b. Need to address HOW theoposed uses of retail sales and one reside unit cannot fit onto this site without deviations; c. While this is being processed as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, need to compare the proposal to the retail sales standards for setbacks, building height and parking, especially in light of reductions to the standards (or increase for building height), in detail; and) 10. Unclear if the recorded Access, Egress and Usage Agreement - Waste Dumpster is acceptable to the Solid Waste Department. It was recorded in January 2009. 11. Need to submit 8.5" x 11" copies of Sheets C2/7, C5/7 and C7/7 (colored elevations). Revised application materials addressing the above need to be submitted by 9:00 am on Tuesday, February 23, 2010, to stay on track to the CDB meeting on March 16, 2010. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me. Wayne M. Wells, AICP Planner III City of Clearwater 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, FL 33756 -5520 Phone: 727- 562 -4504 Fax: 727 - 562 -4865 2 . V TO THE CITY OF CLEARWATER 100 S. MYRTLE ROAD CLEARWATER, FL 33765 8 -14 -09 SUBJECT: Case Number: FLD2008 -02005 - 503 MARSHALL ST OWNER: 1504 Garden Inc. 1504 N Garden Ave, Clearwater, Fl 33755 REPRESENTED BY: Todd Pressman, 28870 Us Hwy 19 N.,Clearwater, F133761 TELEPHONE: 727 - 804 -1760, FAX: 727.669.8114, E -MAIL: pressinc(.a)aol.com Following are our responses to DRC Comments: General Engineering: 1. Show on a scaled drawing the location of the dumpster enclosure. (Not met 7/22/09). RESPONSE: SHOWN ON C2. 2. Is the property presently connected to the city sanitary sewer system? If the property is presently utilizing a septic tank Pinellas County Environmental may require that a connection be m ide to the City's sanitary sewer system (if septic modification permit is required, this permit -hall be obtained prior to issuance of City building permit per State laws). RESPONSE: CONNECTED TO THE CITY SANITARY SYSTEM. e Prior to the issuance of a building permit: 1. Sidewalks and sidewalk ramps adjacent to or a part of the project shall be designed and f constructed consistent with City of Clearwater Contract Specifications and Standards Index # 109; including the A.D.A. (Truncated domes per D.O.T. Index #304.) Include Index #109 on the construction plans. RESPONSE: AGREED. 2. Water meters are not permitted to be located within driveways, sidewalks or other impervious areas. RESPONSE: ACKNOWLEDGED. Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy: 1. Provide a copy of an agreement, recorded in the Official Records of Pinellas County, allowing for shared use of a dumpster enclosure to be constructed on the adjacent property. The agreement shall be binding upon successors in title to both properties and detemnined to be legally acceptable by the City's Legal Department. (7/22/09, MET) 2. Applicant shall submit 5 sets of as -built drawings that are signed and sealed by a professional registered in the State of Florida. The Construction Services Inspector will field inspect as-built drawings for accuracy. RESPONSE: ACKNOWLEDGED. General Note: If the proposed project necessitates infrastructure modifications to satisfy site - specific water capacity and pressure requirements and/or wastewater capacity requirements, the modifications shall be completed by the applicant and at their expense. If underground water mains and hydrants are to be installed, the installation shall be completed and in- service prior to construction in accordance with Fire Department requirements. General Note: DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review, additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. RESPONSE: ACKNOWLEDGED. I . An Asbestos Survey is required prior to conducting any demolition or renovations. Please contact the Pinellas County Air Quality Department at (727) 464 -4422 for further information. RESPONSE: ACKNOWLEDGED. Environmental: Fire: Must meet the requirements of NFPA 101, 2006 edition Chapter 6 table 6.1.14.4.1 (b) Required Separation of Occupancies (hours). Must provide a 2 hour separation between occupancies. RESPONSE: ACKNOWLEDGED I .Plan shows one means of egress from the second floor. this sole. means of exiting SHALL be a 2 hour rated RESPONSE: ACKNOWLEDGED. 2 .Sheet C 4/7 shows that new windows are being added to second floor living area, mast rneet the requirements of NFPA 101. 2006 edition Chapter 24 22.2.2.3.3* It shall be an outside, window or door operable from - -I C3 CJ W - i.L. the inside without the use of tools. keys, or special effort and shall provide a clear opening of not less than 5.7 ft2 (0.53 m2). The width shall be not less than 20 in. (5 10 mm), and the height shall be not less.than 24 in. (610 mm). The bottom of the opening shall be not more than 44 in. (1120 mm) above the floor. Such means of escape shall be acceptable where one of the following criteria is met: (1) The window shall be within 20 ft (6100 mm) of grade. (2) The window shall be directly accessible to fire department rescue apparatus as approved by the authority having jurisdiction. This will be addressed under the building plans 3. Plan is unclear of the location of the required fire hydrant, sheet C2/7 . Provide detail showing the location of fire hydrant on the plan, SHALL be on the same side of the street within 300 feet. RESPONSE: LOCATION (WHICH'IS WITHIN j00 FT TO BUILDING) SHOWN ON C2. Land Resources: Sheets C2/7 and C5/7 - Must curb the east edge of the parking lot (northeast corner of property) and the north and east edges of the foundation landscape area on the north side of the building. 1 .Sheets C2/7 & C5/7 - Relocate the visibility triangle at the street intersection of N. Ft. Harrison Ave and Marshall Street to be at the property lines (not the roadway pavement edge). RESPONSE: SHOWN ON C2. 2 .Comprehensive Landscape Program - Provide a narrative with this application, detailing what the landscape requirements are, the reductions requested, the important factors of the landscape design and how this proposed landscape design exceeds the minimum Code requirements in areas of the site where the minimum Code is not being met. RESPONSE: PROVIDED. 3 .Sheet C5/7 - Relocate cypress trees to be planted along the top edge of the retention pond, to minimize future maintenance issues due to cypress knees. RESPONSE: RELOCATED. Landscaping: A recreation facility impact fee of $200 is due for each new residential unit prior to issuance of building permit or final plat (if applicable) whichever occurs first. RESPONSE: ACKNOWLEDGED. I Parks and Recreation: The following shall be addressed prior to Community Development Board. 1. Pond shall have a maximum side slope of 4:1, not 2:1 as current design shows. Please revise drainage calculations and plan to adhere to this requirement. RESPONSE: REVISED. 2. Will the pond have an outfall? What is the 15" RCP for? 3. RESPONSE: YES. OUTFALL OF POND. General note: 1. DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. 2. At building permit application, applicant shall submit all information again for review and file. RESPONSE: ACKNOWLEDGED. Prior to a Building Permit: 1. Remove high - visibility crosswalks along driveways. RESPONSE: REMOVED. 2. Sight visibility triangles shall be drawn on the property lines. There shall be no objects in the sight triangle which does meet the City's acceptable vertical height criteria at a level between 30 inches above grade and eight feet above _trade. (City's Community Development Code, Section 3 -904). RESPONSE: REVISED. General Note(s):► 1) Applicant shall comply with the current Transportation Impact Fee Ordinance and fee schedule and paid prior to a Certificate' of Occupancy (C.O.). 2) DRC. review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a z� • n j l Building Permit Application. RESPONSE: ACKNOWLEDGED. Ln ': Sheet C2/7 -'Per Section 3-911. all on -site overhead utility lilie=s must b:, placed underground with this proposal such will be done as part of the construction. RESPONSE: NOT REQUIRED AS EXISTING. LLJ .j ProvId lK ie tha :' N. ' '1 • j 11 ' � • 2 . Sheets 2/7 and 5/7 - The eastern driveway is 24 -foot wide. -Relocate the eastern edge of pavement from that presently shown at approximately four feet from the eastern property line to line up with the eastern radius of the driveway. Reconfigure sidewalk access to the residential unit doorway to provide the minimum sidewalk necessary (no more than four feet in width from north side of foundation landscape area) to the parking lot of one parking space. Revise landscape plan to include landscaping of this larger planting area. recognizing this additional area is within the visibility triangle. Provide a back -up flair of sufficient depth for the space on the north side of the building in accordance with Section 3- 1402.J. I. RESPONSE: REVISED. 3 .Sheet C7/7 ( "colored" elevations) - To be consistent with the north and east facades, indicate a tan area along the bottom of the west facade south of the tower to the south building line. RESPONSE: REVISED. 4. Sheet C 1 /7 - Update in the bottom left corner the survey information date, since a newer survey has been submitted. RESPONSE: UPDATED. 5 .Since the property is legally described as one lot plus half of the abutting vacated alley, the following will be included as a condition of approval by the CDB: That, prior to the issuance of any permits, a Declaration of Unity of Title be recorded in the public records: RESPONSE: ACKNOWLEDGED. 6 .Response to Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria #5 - It has been indicated as a response "a b, e ". Provide a response that details HOW this proposal is in compliance with these objectives. RESPONSE: REVISED. 7 .Revise Parcel Number to 09- 29- 15- 55530 - 000 =0100. Page 1 of the application has an incorrect parcel number. Revise. RESPONSE: REVISED. 8 .Response to Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria #2 - a. Need to address HOW the proposal meets the criteria; b. Second sentence - Revise "substantial" to "substantial ": and c. Unclear of the nature of this "successful" developer, and what this has to do with the application (experience indicated on this plan is not one of "success "). RESPONSE: ACKNOWLEDGED. 9 .Application form states "see attached" for the "Description of Request ", but no request is attached'to the application form. In addition to the height increase indicated below under the 12/22/08 & 2/27/08 comment, need to provide an overall description of the request. Following is what I have prepared for potential usage for attachment to the application (may still need to be revised to the specifics of the proposal): "Flexible Development approval to permit a mixed use (retail sales and services on the first floor and an attached dwelling on the second floor) in the Commercial (C) District with a lot area of 7,720 square feet, a lot width of 50.81 feet along N. Ft. Harrison Avenue (west) and 149.95 feet along Marshall Street (north), a front (west) setback of xx feet (to pavement), a front (north) setback of 18 feet (to building) and 4.96 feet (to pavement), a side (east) setback of 0.4 feet (to existing building). and xx feet (to pavement), a side (south) setback of 1.3 feet (to existing building) and zero feet (to pavement), a building height of 31 feet (to top of decorative tower) and 10 spaces, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2- 704.C-, and a reduction to the landscape buffer along Marshall Street (north) from 10 to 4.96 feet (to pavement), a reduction to the landscape buffer along the east property line from five to 0.4 feet (to existing building) and a reduction to the landscape buffer along the south property line from five to 13 feet (to existing building) and to zero feet (to pavement), as a Comprehensive Landscape Program, under the provisions of Section 3- 1202.G." Request needs to include a building height increase for a decorative tower from 25 feet to xx feet (see other comments about providing the height of the tower from existing grade to top of tower).Request also needs to provide a justification for such increase. RESPONSE: ACKNOWLEDGED. 10 . Response to General Applicability criteria #4 - Response needs to address HOW the project minimizes traffic congestion. Suggestion is to address the removal of the existing back -out parking and the improvements to handicap accessibility and pedestrian safety by the removal of such back -out parking. RESPONSE: ACKNOWLEDGED. 1 l . Response to General Applicability criteria # 1 - a. Unclear of the nature of this "successful" developer, and what this has to do with the "success"): application (experience indicated on this plan is not one of and b. Unclear what "C- stores" is. CONVENIENCE STORE. o 12 .Sheet C4/7 - Revise for the following: : `l j o a. Provide a height dimension from existing grade to top of flat roof (assumed not to be 23'•,6 ": assumed this dimension is to the N J IN top of that portion of the parapet); b. Provide a height dimension from the top of the flat roof to the top of the parapets (see "a" above); and I: c. Ensure the correct height to top of flat roof and to the top of the decorative tower are reflected in the Site Data Table on Sheet lM C 1/7 and in the written material. W RESPONSE: PROVIDED. 13 .Sheets C2/7 & C5/7 = Need to properly show any proposed freestanding/monument signage, which should be coordinated with proposed landscaping. RESPONSE: SHOWN. 1 V �•1 .� 14. Required sign setback is five feet from any property line. Revise. RESPONSE: REVISED. 15 . Submit paint samples /swatches for the proposed exterior colors. Sheet C2/7 - Provide dimensions for the following: a. Since additional wall extensions are being added to the north (two locations - east and west) and the west walls of the building, show such building extensions and the new dimensions from the property lines; b. Dimensions from Marshall Street property line to the edges of all parking lot corners (three locations); c. Dimension from the Marshall Street property line to the sidewalk to the dwelling unit (see other Planning comments); d. Dimension from the east property line to the edge of pavement and to the sidewalk to the dwelling unit: and i e. Dimension the width of the foundation landscape area on the north side of the building. RESPONSE: PROVIDED. 16 .Sheet C1 /7 - Revise the Site Data for the following: a. Proposed Usage - Revise from "apartments" to "apartment "; b. Proposed Density - Revise from "0" to 7.352 du/acre; c. Proposed Gross Floor Area and FAR - Revise Gross Floor Area from 3.536 sf to 1,768 square feet. Revise FAR from 0.45 to 022: d. Proposed setbacks - This is a corner lot where there are two front setbacks (north and west) and two side setbacks (south and east). Provide Proposed Setbacks for both Front setbacks (north and west) and for both Side setbacks (south and east). Include proposed setbacks to building and to pavement; e. Proposed Building Height - Make proposed height dimensions consistent with that depicted on Sheet C4/7; f. Proposed Parking Lot Interior Landscaping - None is required to be provided. Unclear why there is a square footage and % of VUA provided (especially in light of no shading on Sheet C2/7 indicating interior landscape area); and g. Parking calculations - Sheet C4/7 indicates the floor area of the first floor retail use to be 1,768 square feet. Unclear where in the parking calculation the 1,610 square feet used for retail comes from (look at detinition for "gross floor area "). Either revise the parking calculation or the square footage on Sheet C4/7 so they match. If 1,768 sf is correct, then nine spaces are required for the retail and insufficient parking is provided for the mixed use (11 required; 10 provided), where a Parking Demand Study would be required to be submitted justifying the reduced parking. RESPONSE: REVISED. 17 .Sheets C4/7 & C7/7 - Sheets are not coordinated as to window, door and tower addition: a. Sheet C4/7 - Proposed north facade is indicated to "remove existing door and replace with new window add new as per plans "; however, the first floor plan does not show such new window. Also, new window not shown on Sheet C7/7; b. Sheet C4/7 - Proposed west facade indicates the new tower addition to be approximately 1/2 of the facade width, but the first and second floor plans indicate the tower addition to be approximately 3/4 of the facade width. Most likely, from a design standpoint and that indicated on the north facade, the tower addition is only about 1/2 of the facade width; c. Sheet C4/7 - Proposed second floor plan indicates two windows in the center and a large window on the west side; however, Sheet C7/7 indicates three windows in the center and a small window on the west side. Which is correct ?; and d. Sheets C4/7 and C7/7 - Ensure the door on the first floor and the window above the door on the second floor are located properly on the west facade consistent with the floor plan. RESPONSE: CORRECTED. 18 . Page 1 of the Application - Provide (fill in) the Legal Description (or state "see attached" and attach the legal description to the application) and the Proposed Use. RESPONSE: PROVIDED. 19 .Project Name on Application (Marshall Building) is not consistent with that indicated in the title blocks on the plans (Garden Avenue Complex). Decide on a Project Name and place on the application and in the title block on the plans. RESPONSE: CORRECTED. 20 _Response to General Applicability criteria #2 - a. Unclear of the nature of this "successful" developer, and what this has to do with the application (experience indicated on this plan is not one of "success").- b. Unclear HOW the proposed improvements will cause significant improvements in the vicinity • —�� and HOW this proposal will be a leader of investment, since there has been more recent investment in the property to the south. i R �- --- -� la RESPONSE: ACKNOWLEDGED. L rs 21 :Response to General Applicability criteria #3 - Provide a response to the criteria as to HOW this proposal will not have any �i fib adverse effects. Talk about the positive improvements relating to health and safety. — " LI RESPONSE: ACKNOWLEDGED. 22 .Response to General Applicability criteria #5 - Revise in the last sentence "loea.der" to "leader". RESPONSE: TYPO CORRECTED. i)4r F 23 .Response to General Applicability criteria #6 - Response could address the improvement to the visual aspect of this property -...5 with the proposal, with the elimination of the duplex on the corner along with the f�.oposed building, parking and landscapinz improvements: Address hours of operation impacts. Address hovi residential unit on the second floor conforms with this cater R. ° 4 Second sentence'does not fit with this criteria (remove or revise).. R1SPONSE: ACKNOWLEDGED. _ n 24 .a. Rewrite first sentence, as it unclear as to its meaning; 1,% 0 0 b. Need to address HOW the proposed uses of retail sales and one residential unit cannot fit onto this site without deviations; c. While this is being processed as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, need to compare the proposal to the retail sales standards for. setbacks, building height and parking, especially in light of reductions to the standards (or increase for building height), in detail; and d. Need to be more specific (expound) as to "considering the surrounding community character ". RESPONSE: ACKNOWLEDGED. 25 .Page I of the application - Enter the Property Owner's name on the appropriate line. If the agent is the same as the Property Owner, then list such along with the appropriate mailing address, phone number(s) and email. This information is not the same as the Agent information. Revise. RESPONSE: REVISED. 26 .Response to Comprehensive InfiV Redevelopment Project criteria #6 - It has been indicated as a response "a b, c ". Provide a response that details HOW this proposal is in compliance with these objectives. RESPONSE: PROVIDED. 27 .Unclear if the recorded Access, Egress and Usage Agreement - Waste Dumpster is acceptable to the Solid Waste Department. It was recorded in January 2009. RESPONSE: ACKNOWLEDGED. 28 .Potential condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: "That the applicant apply for City building permits for after- the -fact interior renovations, building additions and site improvements by xx, 2009 (three months from CDB date). Failure to submit for these permits within this time frame shall cause this Flexible Development approval by the CDB to be null and void and cause enforcement action to be initiated again;" RESPONSE: ACKNOWLEDGED. 29 .Potential condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: That the final design of the building be consistent with the conceptual elevations submitted, or as modified by the CDB;" RESPONSE: ACKNOWLEDGED. 30 .Potential condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: "That the site be limited to one monument sign, at a maximum height of six feet, located outside of visibility triangles, containing the site address and be coordinated /consistent with the color and materials of the building ;" RESPONSE: ACKNOWLEDGED. We hope that above responses are satisfactory. Should you still have any question, please call me on 727- 420 -4796. Tbanking you, You 'Sincerely, V� Dr. Ram A. Goel Soney FM LLC 7. r ' E N ii hL 4'i C Lu -5 d 4', L1. t 0 LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL Date: February 5, 2010 . To: Wayne Wells, Planner III City of Clearwater Planning Department 100 S. Myrtle Ave, #210 Clearwater, FL 33756 Reference: 1504 N. Garden Ave. / FLD2008 -02005 Proj# 041 We Transmit: X Enclosed Under Separate Cover Mail UPS Overnight Pick -Up X Hand Delivered FFB 12 210 ' Cl_ELT*41 -., --R X Originals X_ Prints Addendum Shop drawings Specifications X Applications Floppy Disk Comments: For CDB 03/15/2010 Please contact us at (727) 420 - 479669 should you have any questions or comments. Copies To: File By: Ram A. Goel Copies Date Description 15 2/05/10 Rev. Civil & Landscape Drawings (7 sheets) 1 2/05/10 Rev. 8.5" X 11 "Civil Site Plan 1 2/05/10 Rev. Colored Elevation Dwg 1 2/05/10 Rev. Flex Development Application (Res. Infill Comments: For CDB 03/15/2010 Please contact us at (727) 420 - 479669 should you have any questions or comments. Copies To: File By: Ram A. Goel ) 1 2/05/10 Response to Comments Comments: For CDB 03/15/2010 Please contact us at (727) 420 - 479669 should you have any questions or comments. Copies To: File By: Ram A. Goel Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Friday, February 05, 2010 3:21 PM To: 'soneyfmllc @yahoo.com' Subject: Application TRIK Comprehensiv Infill Project (.. Wayne M. Wells, A/CP Planner III City of Clearwater 100S ' outh Myrtle Avenue Clearater, FL 33756 -5520 Phone: 727- 562 -4504 Fax: 727 - 562 -4865 Wells, Wayne • From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Monday, February 01, 2010 6:40 PM To: 'Presslnc @aol.com' Cc: Tefft, Robert; Watkins, Sherry Subject: Pressman: Re: FLD2008- 02005, 503 Marshall Street Attachments: FLD2008- 02005, 503 Marshall Street; Case Conditions as of 8.24.09.pdf WoTerelm 1. Yes, this application was deemed sufficient to move forward to the CDB. 2. Submit one original package of plans and application revised to address all DRC comments and 14 copies of that original package. 3. Deadline — February 12th — See my attached email sent to you on January 12, 2010. 4. Color elevations —Yes, in all packages. 5. My file is available if you did not keep your last submittal (see Sherry Watkins). See attached Case conditions still outstanding as of 8/24/09. Wayne From: PressInc @aol.com [ma i Ito: PressInc@aol.com] Sent: Monday, February 01, 2010 11:33 AM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: Pressman: Re: FLD2008- 02005, 503 Marshall Street Wayne, the owner is pulling me back in - he is back from an extended absence out of the Country. So, the status here is that it is set to go to the CDB? You are then looking for the (15) sets of copies to be resubmitted? What is the next deadline? Do they have to do those few color copies for the resubmit? Can we have access to the last submitted and comments so that they can reproduce those? any by email? Thanks very much. In a message dated 10/14/2009 9:13:33 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time, Wayne.Wells amyClearwater.com writes: Todd — Based on a phone conversation with Ram Goel, it is my understanding that Hashim is requesting to resubmit the application package for the above referenced application later since he is out of the country and there are coordination issues between consultants. This application was found sufficient to move forward to the CDB at its meeting on August 6, 2009. The next deadline to resubmit to go to the CDB is November 13, 2009, for the December 15, 2009, CDB meeting. Please see what you can do to meet this deadline, as this case has been dragging on for some time. Wayne M. Wells, A/CP Ah Todd Pressman Pressman & Associates, Inc. Governmental and Public Affairs P.O. Box 6015 Palm Harbor, FL 34684 727 - 804 -1760 Fx. (888) 977 -1179 E -MAIL: Pressinc(a.aol.Com • r Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Tuesday, January 12, 2010 11:30 AM To: pressinc @aol.com Cc: Tefft, Robert; Ruud, Alan K Subject: FLD2008- 02005, 503 Marshall Street Todd — • The above referenced application was last reviewed by the Development Review Committee on August 6, 2009, where it was found sufficient to move forward to the Community Development Board for action. A resubmission for the September 15, 2009, CDB meeting did not adequately address the DRC comments and application material was missing. James Pucillo has been in to see me and go over some of the DRC comments. Could you please advise as to when a complete application will be resubmitted, addressing all of the DRC comments? Since work on this property commenced without necessary City approvals and a Stop Work Order was issued in February 2003, attempts to gain compliance is now going on seven years, which is an unacceptable length of time. The next dates to resubmit for CDB review is noon on January 15, 2010, and February 12, 2010. Should we not receive a complete resubmission by the latest of the February 12th date, we will consider this application withdrawn and will commence Code Compliance action. Wayne M. Wells, A/CP Planner III City of Clearwater 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, FL 33756 -5520 Phone: 727 - 562 -4504 Fax: 727 - 562 -4865 • Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Wednesday, October 14, 2009 9:13 AM To: 'Presslnc @aol.com' Cc: 'HSullaiman @aol.com' Subject: FLD2008- 02005, 503 Marshall Street Todd — • Based on a phone conversation with Ram Goel, it is my understanding that Hashim is requesting to resubmit the application package for the above referenced application later since he is out of the country and there are coordination issues between consultants. This application was found sufficient to move forward to the CDB at its meeting on August 6, 2009. The next deadline to resubmit to go to the CDB is November 13, 2009, for the December 15, 2009, CDB meeting. Please see what you can do to meet this deadline, as this case has been dragging on for some time. Wayne M. Wells, A/CP Planner III City of Clearwater 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, FL 33756 -5520 Phone: 727 - 562 -4504 Fax: 727 - 562 -4865 Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Monday, August 24, 2009 10:26 AM To: 'PressInc @aol.com' Cc: 'HSullaiman @aol.com; Watkins, Sherry; Tefft, Robert; Doherty, Steve Subject: FLD2008- 02005, 503 Marshall Street Todd — The above referenced application was resubmitted August 14, 2009, after being found sufficient to move forward to the CDB by the DRC on August 6, 2009. However, the resubmittal information has not adequately addressed the DRC comments or application material is missing. As such, this application is NOT being placed on the September 15, 2009, CDB agenda. I am attaching the Case Comments that still need to be addressed, which includes the material missing from the resubmittal. When resubmitting this application for the next CDB agenda, ensure the application packages are collated, as this is not the responsibility of Sherry Watkins to collate the application material into the CDB packages. In order to be placed on the October 20, 2009, CDB agenda, please make the necessary changes to application material or submit the necessary material (one original and 14 copies) by September 11, 2009. Wayne M. Wells, A/CP Planner III City of Clearwater 100 South Myrtle Avenue .Clearwater, FL 33756 -5520 Phone: 727 - 562 -4504 Fax: 727 - 562 -4865 Case itions as of 8.24 1 e� * 4 Engineering Condition Conditions Associated Wit* FLD2008 -02005 503 MARSHALL ST Steve Doherty 562 -4773 07/22/2009 Prior to review by the Community Development Board: Not Met 1. Show on a scaled drawing the location of the dumpster enclosure. (Not met 7/22/09). MET 8/24/2009 2. Is the property presently connected to the city sanitary sewer system? If the property is presently utilizing a septic tank, Pinellas County Environmental may require that a connection be made to the City's sanitary sewer system (if septic modification permit is required, this permit shall be obtained prior to issuance of City building permit per State laws) NOT MET 8/24/2009 Prior to the issuance of a building permit: 1. Sidewalks.and sidewalk ramps adjacent to or a part of the project shall be designed and constructed consistent with City of Clearwater Contract Specifications and Standards Index #109, including the A.D.A. (Truncated domes per D.O.T. Index #304.) Include Index #109 on the construction plans. 2. Water meters are not permitted to be located within driveways, sidewalks or other impervious - areas. Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy: 1. Provide a copy of an agreement, recorded in the Official Records of Pinellas County, allowing!, ; for shared use of a dumpster enclosure to be constructed on the adjacent property. The • , agreement shall be binding upon successors in title to both properties and determined to be legally acceptable by the City's Legal Department. (7/22/09, MET) 2. Applicant shall submit 5 sets of as -built drawings that are signed and sealed by a professional- registered in the State of Florida. The Construction Services Inspector will field inspect as- built. drawings for accuracy. General Note: If the proposed project necessitates infrastructure modifications to satisfy site - specific water capacity and pressure requirements and /or wastewater capacity requirements, the modifications shall be completed by the applicant and at their expense. If underground water mains and hydrants are to be installed, the installation shall be completed and in- service prior to construction in accordance with Fire Department requirements. General Note: DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. Environmental Condition Sarah Josuns 562 -4897 02/22/2008 An Asbestos Survey is required prior to conducting any demolition or renovations. Please contact Not Met the Pinellas County Air Quality Department at (727) 464 -4422 for further information. Landscape Wayne Wells, AICP 727 - 562 -4504 07/26/2009 8/23/09 - WW Not Met Foundation landscape area must still be curbed. 7/26/09 - WW Sheets C2/7 and C5/7 - Must curb the east edge of the parking lot (northeast corner of property) and the north and east edges of the foundation landscape area on the north side of the building. 07/26/2009 8/23/09 - WW Not Met Need to submit a revised, completed Comprehensive Landscape Program application with the information requested. Print Date: 08/24/2009 CaseConditons Page 1 of 7 0 0 FLD2008 -02005 503 MARSHALL ST Landscape Wayne Wells, AICP 727 - 562 -4504 7/26/09 - WW Comprehensive Landscape Program - Provide a narrative with this application, detailing what the landscape requirements are, the reductions requested, the important factors of the landscape design and how this proposed landscape design exceeds the minimum Code requirements in areas of the site where the minimum Code is not being met. Parks & Recs Condition Debbie Reid 562 -4818 07/21/2009 A recreation facility impact fee of $200 is due for each new residential unit prior to issuance of Not Met building permit or final plat (if applicable) whichever occurs first. Storm Water Condition Phuong Vo 562 -4752 07/16/2009 The following shall be addressed prior to Community Development Board. Not Met 8/24/2009 Note: CONNECTION TO THE CITY CURB INLET WILL PERMIT RETENTION POND TO BE DESIGNED FOR THE.25 -YEAR EVENT, RATHER THAN THE 50 -YEAR EVENT. THIS . WILL PERMIT A REDUCTION IN REQUIRED POND VOLUME. 1. Pond shall have a maximum side slope of 4:1, not 2:1 as current design shows. Please revise drainage calculations and plan to adhere to this requirement. 8/24/2009 - Not Met 2. Will the pond have an outfall? What is the 15" RCP for? 8/24/2009 - Not Met General note: 1. DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. 2. At building. permit application, applicant shall submit all information again for review and file. Solid Waste Condition Tom Glenn 562 -4930 02/26/2008 8/3/09 - TJG Not Met See comments from 12/18/08 - still applicable. 12/18/08 - TJG If applicant sells this parcel how will solid waste be handled? Best to put enclosure and dumpster at this location now so there is no questions of service at a later date. 2/28/08 - TJG How will solid waste be handled will need dumpster and enclosure for size of project? As agreed in FLD2004- 02010: "That this site share the dumpster on the property to the east, through appropriate agreements with the City and the abutting property owner. This off -site dumpster shall be upgraded with appropriate building permits and be properly located and screened to meet City requirements prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for this site." Traffic Eng Condition Bennett Elbo 562 -4775 07/17/2009 Prior to a Building Permit: Not Met 1. Remove high - visibility crosswalks along driveways. 2. Sight visibility triangles shall be drawn on the property lines. There shall be no objects in the sight triangle which does not meet the City's acceptable vertical height criteria at a level between 30 inches above grade and eight feet above grade. (City's Community Development Code, Section 3 -904). General Note(s): 1) Applicant shall comply with the current Transportation Impact Fee Ordinance and fee schedule and paid prior to a Certificate of Occupancy (C.O.). Print Date: 08/24/2009 CaseConditons Page 2 of 7 • FLD2008 -02005 503 MARSHALL ST 0 Traffic Eng Condition Bennett Elbo 562 -4775 2) DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. Zoning Condition Wayne Wells, AICP 727 - 562 -4504 12/17/2008 8/23/09 - WW Not Met Application form submitted does not include the applicant signature on Page 7 nor the completed Affidavit Page 8. 7/28/09 & 12/17/08 - WW Page 8 of the application, Affidavit to Authorize Agent, has not been submitted (needs to be completed to authorize Todd Pressman as the agent). 02/28/2008 8/23/09 - WW Not Met Despite the response to comment, the requirement must still be met. 7/28/09, 12/22/08 & 2/28/08 - WW Sheet C2/7 - Per Section 3 -911, all on -site overhead utility lines must be placed underground with this proposal. Provide note that such will be done as part of the construction. 07/26/2009 8/23/09 - WW Not Met Driveway revised. The expanded landscaping on the east side of the driveway is shown only as turf. With the reductions requested, this expanded area can be landscaped with shrubs and groundcovers in lieu of turf. Revise. 7/26/09 - WW Sheets 2/7 and 5/7 -.The eastern driveway is 24 -foot wide. Relocate the eastern edge of pavement from that presently shown at approximately four feet from the eastern property,line to. line up with the eastern radius of the driveway. Reconfigure sidewalk access to the: residential... unit doorway to provide the minirrium'sidewalk necessary (no more than four feet m width from <: north side of foundation landscape area) to the parking lot of one parking space., R py!se landscape plan to include landscaping of this larger planting area, recognizing this,additional area is within the visibility triangle. Provide a back -up flair of sufficient depth for the space on the north .side of the building in accordance with Section 3- 1402.J.1. 02/28/2008 8/23/09 - WW Not Met No colored elevations submitted (either 24 "x36" or reduced 8.5 "x11 "). Unclear if revised as requested. 7/28/09, 12/22/08 & 2/28/08 - WW Sheet C7/7 ( "colored" elevations) - To be consistent with the north and east facades, indicate a tan area along the bottom of the west facade south of the tower to the south building line. 02/27/2008 8/23/09, 7/28/09, 12/21/08 & 2/27/08 - WW Not Met Since the property is legally described as one lot plus half of the abutting vacated alley, the following will be included as a condition of approval by the CDB: That, prior to the issuance of any permits, a Declaration of Unity of Title be recorded in the public records; 07/28/2009 8/23/09 - WW Not Met Response to "a" does not address the objective. Unclear how this is affordable housing ( ?). Explain. 7/28/09 & 12/22/08 - WW Response to Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria #5 - It has been indicated as a response "a, b, a ". Provide a response that details HOW this proposal is in compliance with these objectives. 12/17/2008 8/23/09 - WW Not Met Revise the Parcel Number to 09 (not 9). 7/27/09 - WW Revise Parcel Number to 09- 29 -15- 55530 - 000 -0100. Print Date: 08/24/2009 Page 3 of 7 CaseConditons • FLD2008 -02005 503 MARSHALL ST Zoning Condition Wayne Wells, AICP 12/17/09 - WW Page 1 of the application has an incorrect parcel number. Revise. L 727 - 562 -4504 07/28/2009 8/23/09 - WW Not Met Still need responses or revised responses to "a" and "c" below. 7/28/09 - WW Response to Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria #2 - a. Need to address HOW the proposal meets the criteria; b. Second sentence - Revise "substantial" to "substantial "; and c. Unclear of the nature of this "successful" developer, and what this has to do with the application (experience indicated on this plan is not one of "success "). 02/27/2008 8/23/09 and 7/27/09 - WW Not Met Application form states "see attached" for the "Description of Request ", but no request is attached to the application form. In addition to the height increase indicated below under the 12/22/08 & 2/27/08 comment, need to provide an overall description of the request. Following is what I have prepared for potential usage for attachment to the application (may still need to be revised to the specifics of the proposal): "Flexible Development approval to permit a mixed use (retail sales and services on the first floor and an attached dwelling on the second floor) in the Commercial (C) District with a lot area of 7,720 square feet, a lot width of 50.81 feet along N. Ft. Harrison Avenue (west) and 149.95 feet along Marshall Street (north), a front (west) setback of xx feet (to- pavement), a front (north) setback of 18 feet (to building) and 4.96 feet (to pavement), a side. (east) setback of 0.4 feet (to existing building) and xx feet (to pavement), a side (south)�setback.of . 1..3 feet.(to existing building) and'zero feet (to pavement), a building height of 31 feet (to.top of.;..,.... decorative tower) and 10 spaces, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the,...; ;provisions of Section 27704.C; and a reduction to the landscape buffer along Marshall,-Street (north) from 10 to 4.96 feet.(to.pavement), a reduction to the landscape buffer along the east property line from five to 0.4 feet (to existing building) and a reduction to the landscapp.buff, er along the south property line from five to 1.3 feet (to existing building) and to zero feet (to, 'pavement), as a Comprehensive Landscape Program, under the provisions of Section 3- 1202.G." 12/22/08 & 2/27/08 - WW Request needs to include a building height increase for a decorative tower from 25. feet to xx feet (see other comments about providing the height of the tower from existing grade to top of tower). .Request also needs to provide a justification for such increase. 07/28/2009 8/23/09 - WW Not Met Still need to address "a" below. 7/28/09 - WW Response to General Applicability criteria #1 - a. Unclear of the nature of this "successful" developer, and what this has to do with the application (experience indicated on this plan is not one of "success "); and b. Unclear what "C- stores" is. 07/28/2009 8/23/09 - WW Not Met Still unclear on "a ", "b" and "c" below. 7/28/09 - WW Sheet C4/7 - Revise for the following: a. Provide a height dimension from existing grade to top of flat roof (assumed not to be 23' -6'; assumed this dimension is to the top of that portion of the parapet); b. Provide a height dimension from the top of the flat roof to the top of the parapets (see "a" above); and c. Ensure the correct height to top of flat roof and to the top of the decorative tower are reflected in the Site Data Table on Sheet C1/7 and in the written material. 07/28/2009 8/23/09 and 7/28/09 - WW Not Met Submit paint samples /swatches for the proposed exterior colors. Print Date: 08/24/2009 Page 4 of 7 CaseConditons FLD2008 -02005 503 MARSHALL ST • Zoning Condition Wayne Wells, AICP 727 - 562 -4504 07/28/2009 8/23/09 - WW Not Met Still need to address "a" and "c" below. Unclear of what the 5.86 dimension at the NW corner of the western parking area is measured to. 7/28/09 - WW Sheet C2/7 - Provide dimensions for the following: a. Since additional wall extensions are being added to the north (two locations - east and west) and the west walls of the building, show such building extensions and the new dimensions from the property lines; b. Dimensions from Marshall Street property line to the edges of all parking lot corners (three locations); c. Dimension from the Marshall Street property line to the sidewalk to the dwelling unit (see :other, . Planning comments); d. Dimension from the east property line to the edge of pavement and to the sidewalk to the dwelling unit; and e. Dimension the width of the foundation landscape area on the north side of the building. .07/28/2009 8/23/09 - WW Not Met Still need to address "d ", "e" and 'T' below. 7/28/09 - WW Sheet C1/7 - Revise the Site Data for the following: a. Proposed Usage - Revise from "apartments" to "apartment"; b Proposed Density - Revise from "0" to 7.352 du /acre; c. Proposed Gross Floor Area and FAR - Revise Gross Floor Area from 3.536 sf to ,1 768.square feet: Revise FAR from 0.45 to 0.22; ; d: Proposed setbacks. -'This is a corner lot where there are two front setbacks (nortl •:,gpd,west),,,- _ and two side setbacks (south and east). Provide Proposed Setbacks for both Front,aetbacks (north and west) and fog both Side setbacks (south and 'east). Include proposed setbacks building and to pavement; e. Proposed Building Height - Make proposed height dimensions consistent with that depicted on Sheet C4/7; f. Proposed Parking Lot Interior Landscaping - None is required to be provided. Unclear.why there is a square footage and % of VUA provided (especially in light of no shading on Sheet C2/7 indicating interior landscape area); and g. Parking calculations - Sheet C4/7 indicates the floor area of the first floor retail use to be 1,768 square feet. Unclear where in the parking calculation the 1,610 square feet used for retail comes from (look at definition for "gross floor area "). Either revise the parking calculation or the square footage on Sheet C4/7 so they match. If 1,768 sf is correct, then nine spaces are required for the retail and insufficient parking is provided for the mixed use (11 required; 10 provided), where a Parking Demand Study would be required to be submitted justifying the reduced parking. 07/28/2009 8/23/09 & 7/28/09 - WW Not Met Sheets C4/7 & C7/7 - Sheets are not coordinated as to window, door and tower addition: a. Sheet C4/7 - Proposed north facade is indicated to "remove existing door and replace with new window add new as per plans "; however, the first floor plan does not show such new window. Also, new window not shown on Sheet C7/7; b. Sheet C4/7 - Proposed west facade indicates the new tower addition to be approximately 1/2 of the facade width, but the first and second floor plans indicate the tower addition to be approximately 3/4 of the facade width. Most likely, from a design standpoint and that indicated on the north facade, the tower addition is only about 1/2 of the facade width; c. Sheet C4/7 - Proposed second floor plan indicates two windows in the center and a large window on the west side; however, Sheet C7/7 indicates three windows in the center and a small window on the west side. Which is correct ?; and d. Sheets C4/7 and C7/7 - Ensure the door on the first floor and the window above the door on the second floor are located properly on the west facade consistent with the floor plan. Print Date: 08/24/2009 Page 5 of 7 CaseConditons FLD2008 -02005 503 MARSHALL ST Zoning Condition Wayne Wells, AICP 727 - 562 -4504 07/28/2009 8/23/09 & 7/28/09 - WW Page 1 of the Application - Provide (fill in) the Legal Description (or state "see attached" and attach the legal description to the application) and the Proposed Use. 07/28/2009 8/23/09 & 7/28/09 - WW Response to General Applicability criteria #2 - a. Unclear of the nature of this "successful" developer, and what this has to do with the application (experience indicated on this plan is not one of "success "); b. Unclear HOW the proposed improvements will cause significant improvements in the vicinity and HOW this proposal will be a leader of investment, since there has been more recent investment in the property to the south.. Not Met Not Met 07/28/2009 8/23/09 & 7/28/09 - WW Not Met Response to General Applicability criteria #6 - Response could address the improvement to the visual aspect of this property with the proposal, with the elimination of the duplex on the corner, along with the proposed building, parking and landscaping improvements. Address hours of operation impacts. Address how residential unit on the second floor conforms with this criteria. Second sentence does not fit with this criteria (remove or revise). 07/28/2009 8/23/09 & 7/28/09 - WW Response to Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria #1 - a. Rewrite first sentence, as it unclear as to its meaning; b. Need to address HOW the proposed uses of retail sales and one residential_ unit cannot fit,onto this site without deviations; c. While.this is being processed as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, need to compare the proposal to the retail sales standards for setbacks, building ,height and parking especially in light of reductions to the standards (or increase for building - height) if?..detail;:and .., d.,Need to be more specific (expound) as to "considering the surround ing:community character,,, .:._ Not Met 07/27/2009 8/23/09 & 7/27/09 - WW Not Met Page 1 of the application - Enter the Property Owner's name on the appropriate line. If the agent is the same as the Property Owner, then list such along with the appropriate mailing address, phone number(s) and email. This information is not the same as the Agent information. Revise. 07/28/2009 8/23/09 - WW Not Met Provide a response to ALL of the objectives. 7/28/09 & 12/22/08 - WW Response to Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria #6 - It has been indicated as a response "a, b, c ". Provide a response that details HOW this proposal is in compliance with these objectives. 07/28/2009 8/23/09 & 7/28/09 - WW Not Met Unclear if the recorded Access, Egress and Usage Agreement - Waste Dumpster is acceptable to the Solid Waste Department. It was recorded in January 2009. 07/28/2009 8/23/09 & 7/28/09 - WW Not Met Potential condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: "That the applicant apply for City building permits for after - the -fact interior renovations, building additions and site improvements by xx, 2009 (three months from CDB date). Failure to submit for these permits within this time frame shall cause this Flexible Development approval by the CDB to be null and void and cause enforcement action to be initiated again;" 07/28/2009 8/23/09 & 7/28/09 - WW Not Met Potential condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: "That the final design of the building be consistent with the conceptual elevations submitted, or as modified by the CDB;" Print Date: 08/24/2009 Page 6 of 7 CaseConditons I i FLD2008 -02005 503 MARSHALL ST • Zoning Condition Wayne Wells, AICP 727 - 562 -4504 07/28/2009 8/23/09 & 7/28/09 - WW Potential condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: "That the site be limited to one monument sign, at a maximum height of six feet, located outside of visibility triangles, containing the site address and be coordinated /consistent with the color and materials of the building;" Not Met Print Date: 08/24/2009 CaseConditons Page 7 of 7 TO THE CITY OF CLEARWATER 100 S. MYRTLE ROAD CLEARWATER, FL 33765 8 -14 -09 SUBJECT: Case Number: FLD2008 -02005 -- 503 MARSHALL ST OWNER: 1504 Garden Inc. 1504 N Garden Ave. Clearwater, FI 33755 REPRESENTED BY: Todd Pressman, 28870 Us Hwy 19 N.,Clearwater, Fl 33761 TELEPHONE: 727 - 804 -1760, FAX: 727.669.8114. E -MAIL: pressinc taaol.com Following are our responses to DRC Comments General Engineering: 1. Show on a scaled drawing the location of the dumpster enclosure. (Not met 7/22/09). RESPONSE: SHOWN ON C2. 2. Is the property presently connected to the city sanitary sewer system? If the property is presently utilizing a septic tank; Pinellas County Environmental may require that a connection be made to the City's sanitary sewer system (if septic modification permit is required, this permit shall be obtained prior to issuance of City building permit per State laws). RESPONSE: CONNECTED TO THE CITY SANITARY SYSTEM. Prior to the issuance of a building permit: 1. Sidewalks and sidewalk ramps adjacent to or a part of the project shall be designed and constructed consistent with City of Clearwater Contract Specifications and Standards Index 4109, including the A.D.A. (Truncated domes per D.O.T. Index #304.) Include Index # 109 on the construction plans. RESPONSE: AGREED. 2. Water meters are not permitted to be located within driveways, sidewalks or other impervious areas. RESPONSE: ACKNOWLEDGED. Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy: 1. Provide a copy of an agreement, recorded in the Official Records of Pinellas County, allowing for shared use of a dumpster enclosure to be constructed on the adjacent property. The agreement shall be binding upon successors in title to both properties and determined to be legally acceptable by the City's Legal Department. (7/22/09, MET) 2. Applicant shall submit 5 sets of as -built drawings that are signed and sealed by a professional registered in the State of Florida. The Construction Services Inspector will field inspect as -built drawings for accuracy. RESPONSE: ACKNOWLEDGED. General Note: If the proposed project necessitates infrastructure modifications to satisfy site - specific water capacity and pressure requirements and /or wastewater capacity requirements, the modifications shall be completed by the applicant and at their expense. If underground water mains and hydrants are to be installed, the installation shall be completed and in- service prior to construction in accordance with Fire Department requirements. General Note: DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review: additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. RESPONSE: ACKNOWLEDGED. 1 . An Asbestos Survey is required prior to conducting any demolition or renovations. Please contact the Pinellas County Air Quality Department at (727) 464 -4422 for further information. RESPONSE: ACKNOWLEDGED. ORIGINAL R k u 1, Environmental:L����� Fire: Must meet the requirements of NFPA 101. 2006 edition Chapter 6 table 6.1.14.4.1 (b) Required Separation of Occupancies (hours). Must provide a 2 hour separation between occupancies. RESPONSE: ACKNOWLEDGED I .Plan shows one means of egress from the second floor. this sole means of exiting SHALL be a 2 hour rated RESPONSE: ACKNOWLEDGED. 2 .Sheet C 4/7 shows that new windows are being added to second floor living area_ must meet the requirements of NFPA 101. 2006 edition Chapter 24 24.2.2.3.3 * It shall be an outside window or door operable from 0 0 the inside without the use of tools, keys, or special effort and shall provide a clear opening of not less than 5.7 ft2 (0.53 m2). The width shall be not less than 20 in. (5 10 mm), and the height shall be not less than 24 in. (610 mm). The bottom of the opening shall be not more than 44 in. (1120 mm) above the floor. Such means of escape shall be acceptable where one of the following criteria is met: (1) The window shall be within 20 ft (6100 mm) of grade. (2) The window shall be directly accessible to fire department rescue apparatus as approved by the authority having jurisdiction. This will be addressed under the building plans 3. Plan is unclear of the location of the required fire hydrant, sheet C2/7 . Provide detail showing the location of fire hydrant on the plan, SHALL be on the same side of the street within 300 feet. RESPONSE: LOCATION (WHICH IS WITHIN 300 FT TO BUILDING) SHOWN ON C2. Land Resources: Sheets C2/7 and C5/7 - Must curb the east edge of the parking lot (northeast corner of property) and the north and east edges of the foundation landscape area on the north side of the building. 1 .Sheets C2/7 & C5/7 - Relocate the visibility triangle at the street intersection of N. Ft. Harrison Ave and Marshall Street to be at the property lines (not the roadway pavement edge). RESPONSE: SHOWN ON C2. 2 .Comprehensive Landscape Program - Provide a narrative with this application, detailing what the landscape requirements are, the reductions requested, the important factors of the landscape design and how this proposed landscape design exceeds the minimum Code requirements in areas of the site where the minimum Code is not being met. RESPONSE: PROVIDED. 3 .Sheet C5/7 - Relocate cypress trees to be planted along the top edge of the retention pond, to minimize future maintenance issues due to cypress knees. RESPONSE: RELOCATED. Landscaping: A recreation facility impact fee of $200 is due for each new residential unit prior to issuance of building permit or final plat (if applicable) whichever occurs first. RESPONSE: ACKNOWLEDGED. Parks and Recreation: The following shall be addressed prior to Community Development Board. 1. Pond shall have a maximum side slope of 4:1, not 2:1 as current design shows. Please revise drainage calculations and plan to adhere to this requirement. RESPONSE: REVISED. 2. Will the pond have an outfall? What is the 15" RCP for? 3. RESPONSE: YES. OUTFALL OF POND. General note: 1. DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review: additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. 2. At building permit application, applicant shall submit all information again for review and file. RESPONSE: ACKNOWLEDGED. Prior to a Building Permit: I. Remove high- visibility crosswalks along driveways. RESPONSE: REMOVED. 2. Sight visibility triangles shall be drawn on the property lines. There shall be no objects in the sight triangle which does not meet the City's acceptable vertical height criteria at a level between 30 inches above grade and eight feet above grade. (City's Community Development Code, Section 3 -904). RESPONSE: REVISED. General Note(s): 1) Applicant shall comply with the current Transportation Impact Fee Ordinance and fee schedule and paid prior to a Certificate of Occupancy (C.O.). 2) DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. RESPONSE: ACKNOWLEDGED. Sheet C2/7 - Per Section 3-911. all on -site overhead utility lines must be placed underground with this proposal. Provide note that such will be done as part of the construction. RESPONSE: NOT REQUIRED AS EXISTING. ®e1er4n A 10 AUG 1 a NOS 0 0 2 . Sheets 2/7 and 5/7 - The eastern driveway is 24 -foot wide. Relocate the eastern edge of pavement from that presently shown at approximately four feet from the eastern property line to line up with the eastern radius of the driveway. Reconfigure sidewalk access to the residential unit doorway to provide the minimum sidewalk necessary (no more than four feet in width from north side of foundation landscape area) to the parking lot of one parking space. Revise landscape plan to include landscaping of this larger planting area_ recognizing this additional area is within the visibility triangle. Provide a back -up flair of sufficient depth for the space on the north side of the building in accordance with Section 3- 1402.J.1. RESPONSE: REVISED. 3 .Sheet C7/7 ( "colored" elevations) - To be consistent with the north and east facades, indicate a tan area along the bottom of the west facade south of the tower to the south building line. RESPONSE: REVISED. 4 . Sheet C 1/7 - Update in the bottom left corner the survey information date, since a newer survey has been submitted. RESPONSE: UPDATED. 5 .Since the property is legally described as one lot plus half of the abutting vacated alley, the following will be included as a condition of approval by the CDB: That, prior to the issuance of any permits, a Declaration of Unity of Title be recorded in the public records: RESPONSE: ACKNOWLEDGED. 6 .Response to Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria #5 - It has been indicated as a response "a b, e ". Provide a response that details HOW this proposal is in compliance with these objectives. RESPONSE: REVISED. 7 .Revise Parcel Number to 09- 29 -15- 55530- 000 -0100. Page 1 of the application has an incorrect parcel number. Revise. RESPONSE: REVISED. 8 .Response to Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria #2 - a. Need to address HOW the proposal meets the criteria: b. Second sentence - Revise "substantial" to "substantial ": and c. Unclear of the nature of this "successful" developer, and what this has to do with the application (experience indicated on this plan is not one of "success "). RESPONSE: ACKNOWLEDGED. 9 .Application form states "see attached" for the "Description of Request ", but no request is attached to the application form. In addition to the height increase indicated below under the 12/22/08 & 2/27/08 comment, need to provide an overall description of the request. Following is what I have prepared for potential usage for attachment to the application (may still need to be revised to the specifics of the proposal): "Flexible Development approval to permit a mixed use (retail sales and services on the first floor and an attached dwelling on the second floor) in the Commercial (C) District with a lot area of 7,720 square feet, a lot width of 50.81 feet along N. Ft. Harrison Avenue (west) and 149.95 feet along Marshall Street (north), a front (west) setback of xx feet (to pavement), a front (north) setback of 18 feet (to building) and 4.96 feet (to pavement), a side (east) setback of 0.4 feet (to existing building) and xx feet (to pavement), a side (south) setback of 1.3 feet (to existing building) and zero feet (to pavement), a building height of 31 feet (to top of decorative tower) and 10 spaces, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2- 704.C; and a reduction to the landscape buffer along Marshall Street (north) from 10 to 4.96 feet (to pavement), a reduction to the landscape buffer along the east property line from five to 0.4 feet (to existing building) and a reduction to the landscape buffer along the south property line from five to 1.3 feet (to existing building) and to zero feet (to pavement), as a Comprehensive Landscape Program, under the provisions of Section 3- 1202.G." Request needs to include a building height increase for a decorative tower from 25 feet to xx feet (see other comments about providing the height of the tower from existing grade to top of tower).Request also needs to provide a justification for such increase. RESPONSE: ACKNOWLEDGED. 10 . Response to General Applicability criteria #4 - Response needs to address HOW the project minimizes traffic congestion. Suggestion is to address the removal of the existing back -out parking and the improvements to handicap accessibility and pedestrian safety by the removal of such back -out parking. RESPONSE: ACKNOWLEDGED. 11 . Response to General Applicability criteria # 1 - a. Unclear of the nature of this "successful" developer, and what this has to do with the application (experience indicated on this plan is not one of "success "); and b. Unclear what "C- stores" is. CONVENIENCE STORE. 12 .Sheet C4/7 - Revise for the following: a. Provide a height dimension from existing grade to top of flat roof (assumed not to be 23' -6 "; assumed this dimension is to the top of that portion of the parapet): b. Provide a height dimension from the top of the flat roof to the top of the parapets (see "a" above): and c. Ensure the correct height to top of flat roof and to the top of the decorative tower are reflected in the Site Data Table on Sheet Cl /7 and in the written material. RESPONSE: PROVIDED. 13 .Sheets C2/7 & C5/7 - Need to properly show any proposed freestanding/monument signage, which should be coordinated with proposed landscaping. RESPONSE: SHOWN. F6U 6 CC IPLANW4G._ _ 0 0 14. Required sign setback is five feet from any property line. Revise. RESPONSE: REVISED. 15 . Submit paint samples /swatches for the proposed exterior colors. Sheet C2/7 - Provide dimensions for the following: a. Since additional wall extensions are being added to the north (two locations - east and west) and the west walls of the building, show such building extensions and the new dimensions from the property lines: b. Dimensions from Marshall Street property line to the edges of all parking lot corners (three locations); c. Dimension from the Marshall Street property line to the sidewalk to the dwelling unit (see other Planning comments); d. Dimension from the east property line to the edge of pavement and to the sidewalk to the dwelling unit; and e. Dimension the width of the foundation landscape area on the north side of the building. RESPONSE: PROVIDED. 16 .Sheet C1 /7 - Revise the Site Data for the following: a. Proposed Usage - Revise from "apartments" to "apartment "; b. Proposed Density - Revise from "0" to "7352 du /acre; c. Proposed Gross Floor Area and FAR - Revise Gross Floor Area from 3.536 sf to 1,768 square feet. Revise FAR from 0.45 to 0.22: d. Proposed setbacks - This is a corner lot where there are two front setbacks (north and west) and two side setbacks (south and east). Provide Proposed Setbacks for both Front setbacks (north and west) and for both Side setbacks (south and east). Include proposed setbacks to building and to pavement; e. Proposed Building Height - Make proposed height dimensions consistent with that depicted on Sheet C4/7; f. Proposed Parking Lot Interior Landscaping - None is required to be provided. Unclear why there is a square footage and % of V UA provided (especially in light of no shading on Sheet C2/7 indicating interior landscape area); and g. Parking calculations - Sheet C4/7 indicates the floor area of the first floor retail use to be 1,768 square feet. Unclear where in the parking calculation the 1,610 square feet used for retail comes from (look at definition for "gross floor area "). Either revise the parking calculation or the square footage on Sheet C4/7 so they match. If 1,768 sf is correct, then nine spaces are required for the retail and insufficient parking is provided for the mixed use (11 required; 10 provided), where a Parking Demand Study would be required to be submitted justifying the reduced parking. RESPONSE: REVISED. 17 .Sheets C4/7 & C7/7 - Sheets are not coordinated as to window, door and tower addition: a. Sheet C4/7 - Proposed north facade is indicated to "remove existing door and replace with new window add new as per plans "; however, the first floor plan does not show such new window. Also, new window not shown on Sheet C7/7; b. Sheet C4/7 - Proposed west facade indicates the new tower addition to be approximately 1/2 of the facade width, but the first and second floor plans indicate the tower addition to be approximately 3/4 of the facade width. Most likely, from a design standpoint and that indicated on the north facade, the tower addition is only about 1/2 of the facade width; c. Sheet C4/7 - Proposed second floor plan indicates two windows in the center and a large window on the west side; however, Sheet C7/7 indicates three windows in the center and a small window on the west side. Which is correct ?; and d. Sheets C4/7 and C7/7 - Ensure the door on the first floor and the window above the door on the second floor are located properly on the west facade consistent with the floor plan. RESPONSE: CORRECTED. 18 . Page 1 of the Application - Provide (fill in) the Legal Description (or state "see attached" and attach the legal description to the application) and the Proposed Use. RESPONSE: PROVIDED. 19 .Project Name on Application (Marshall Building) is not consistent with that indicated in the title blocks on the plans (Garden Avenue Complex). Decide on a Project Name and place on the application and in the title block on the plans. RESPONSE: CORRECTED. 20 .Response to General Applicability criteria #2 - a. Unclear of the nature of this "successful" developer, and what this has to do with the application (experience indicated on this plan is not one of "success "); b. Unclear HOW the proposed improvements will cause significant improvements in the vicinity and HOW this proposal will be a leader of investment, since there has been more recent investment in the property to the south. RESPONSE: ACKNOWLEDGED. 21 .Response to General Applicability criteria #3 - Provide a response to the criteria as to HOW this proposal will not have any adverse effects. Talk about the positive improvements relating to health and safety. RESPONSE: ACKNOWLEDGED. 22 .Response to General Applicability criteria #5 - Revise in the last sentence "loeader" to "leader ". RESPONSE: TYPO CORRECTED. 23 .Response to General Applicability criteria #6 - Response could address the improvement to the visual aspect of this property with the proposal, with the elimination of the duplex on the corner, along with the proposed building, parking and landscaping improvements. Address hours of operation impacts. Address how residential unit on the second floor conforms with this criteria. Second sentence does not fit with this criteria (remove or revise). RESPONSE: ACKNOWLEDGED. 24 .a. Rewrite first sentence, as it unclear as to its meaning; ORIGINAL RECT AUG 14 2nog PLANNING 9 0 b. Need to address HOW the proposed uses of retail sales and one residential unit cannot fit onto this site without deviations; c. While this is being processed as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project; need to compare the proposal to the retail sales standards for setbacks, building height and parking, especially in light of reductions to the standards (or increase for building height), in detail; and d. Need to be more specific (expound) as to "considering the surrounding community character ". RESPONSE: ACKNOWLEDGED. 25 .Page 1 of the application - Enter the Property Owner's name on the appropriate line. If the agent is the same as the Property Owner, then list such along with the appropriate mailing address, phone number(s) and email. This information is not the same as the Agent information. Revise. RESPONSE: REVISED. 26 .Response to Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria #6 - It has been indicated as a response "a. b. c ". Provide a response that details HOW this proposal is in compliance with these objectives. RESPONSE: PROVIDED. 27 .Unclear if the recorded Access. Egress and Usage Agreement - Waste Dumpster is acceptable to the Solid Waste Department. It was recorded in January 2009. RESPONSE: ACKNOWLEDGED. 28 .Potential condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: "That the applicant apply for City building permits for after - the -fact interior renovations, building additions and site improvements by xx. 2009 (three months from CDB date). Failure to submit for these permits within this time frame shall cause this Flexible Development approval by the CDB to be null and void and cause enforcement action to be initiated again;" RESPONSE: ACKNOWLEDGED. 29 .Potential condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: That the final design of the building be consistent with the conceptual elevations submitted, or as modified by the CDB;" RESPONSE: ACKNOWLEDGED. 30 .Potential condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: "That the site be limited to one monument sign, at a maximum hei4kytJ *i#4fpgt, located outside of visibility triangles, containing the site address and be coordinated /consistent with the color aaH materials of tfi&buildine:" � t above responses-I Saatisfactory. Should you still have any question, please call me on 727 - 420 -4796. Thanking �inc�rel� o � • � " IM ' Goer Q) FDIC. ^^•�C-) r ORIGINAL eLU 1 U9 PANNING a • LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL Date: August 12, 2009 To: Wayne Wells, Planner III City of Clearwater Planning Department 100 S. Myrtle Ave, #210 Clearwater, FL 33756 Reference: 11504 N. Garden Ave. / FLD2008 -02005 Proj # 041 We Transmit: X Enclosed Under Separate Cover X Originals Mail UPS Overnight X Prints Pick -Up X Hand Delivered Addendum Shop drawings Specifications X Applications Floppy Disk Comments: For C'DB 9/1512009 Please contact us at (727) 420 - 479669 should you have any questions or comments. Copies To: File By. kqr, A „ r Ram A. Goel ������ Copies Date Description 8/14/09 Rev. 8 8.5" X 11" Civil Site Plan 1 8 15 8/14/09 Rev. Civil & Landscape 8/14/09 Rev. F Flex Development Application (Res. Infill) 1 8 8/14/09 R Response to Comments 1 8 8/14/09 S Storm Water Drainage Calculations Comments: For C'DB 9/1512009 Please contact us at (727) 420 - 479669 should you have any questions or comments. Copies To: File By. kqr, A „ r Ram A. Goel ������ Drawings sheets) l,S' 8 8/14/09 Rev. 8 8.5" X 11" Civil Site Plan 1 8 8/14/09 Rev. C Colored Elevation Dw 1 S" 8 8/14/09 Rev. F Flex Development Application (Res. Infill) 1 8 8/14/09 R Response to Comments 1 8 8/14/09 S Storm Water Drainage Calculations C'DB 9/1512009 Please contact us at (727) 420 - 479669 should you have any questions or comments. Copies To: File By. kqr, A „ r Ram A. Goel ������ Wells, Wayne From: Press Inc @aol.com Sent: Tuesday, July 28, 2009 8:13 PM To: Jackson, Matthew; Wells, Wayne; Watkins, Sherry Subject: Pressman: Conflict Time for 8/6 DRC Hello ... on 8/6 1 have Hashim Sulliaum for a small use at the DRC on Alt. 19 - it has been in the system for a long time. .. I have already been scheduled for a 10 am DRC in New Port Richey - Lisa Fierce is the boss up there now... So, I would like to request that you please schedule me for after 12 noon on 8/6. Thanks very much Todd Pressman Pressman & Associates, Inc. . Governmental and Public Affairs P.O. Box 6015 Palm Harbor, FL 34684 727 - 804 -1760 Fx. (888) 977 -1179 E -MAIL: Pressinc(a)aol.Com r A Good Credit Score is 700 or Above. See yours in iust 2 easy steps! 1 a • Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Monday, June 29, 2009 10:55 AM To: 'Presslnc @aol.com' Cc: Watkins, Sherry Subject: FLD2008- 02005, 503 Marshall Street WTOTOAL The above referenced application has been scheduled for DRC review on August 6, 2009. We will call or email closer to the DRC meeting as to the specific meeting time for this application. Wayne M. Wells, A/CP Planner III City of Clearwater 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, FL 33756 -5520 Phone: 727 - 562 -4504 Fax: 727 - 562 -4865 1 a Wells, Wayne 0 From: Press Inc @aol.com Sent: Thursday, June 04, 2009 8:02 AM To: Wells, Wayne Cc: HSullaiman @aol.com; Tefft, Robert; Ruud, Alan K; Coccia, Mike Subject: Re: FLD2008- 02005, 503 Marshall Street have just gotten revised plans. Exactly what is required for the resubmittal? Thanks In a message dated 5/15/2009 8:31:09 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time, Wayne.Wells(a�mVClearwater.com writes: Todd - This application was last reviewed by the DRC on January 8, 2009, and was determined insufficient to move forward to the CDB. The provision of an adequate number of parking spaces appears to be the main issue for this application. Based on discussions with you, Hashim and your consultants, it appears that you are pursuing a "mixed -use" of retail on the ground floor and a dwelling on the second floor. However, it has been over four months since the last DRC meeting. This project appears to be again stalled and movement one way or another is necessary. The following actions appear appropriate at this time: Todd Pressman Pressman & Associates, Inc. Governmental and Public Affairs P.O. Box 6015 Palm Harbor, FL 34684 727 - 804 -1760 Fx. (888) 977 -1179 E -MAIL: Press inc(aD-aol.Com We found the real 'Hotel California' and the 'Seinfeld' diner. What will you find? Explore WhereltsAt.com. C Wells, Wayne From: Todd Pressman [pressinc @aol.com] Sent: Wednesday, June 03, 2009 12:58 PM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: Fld 2008 - 02005, 503 Marshall • am getting plans by the end of this week (I've seen them) exactly what is required for the resubmittal? Todd Pressman, President, Pressman & Associates, Inc. P.O. Box 6015 Palm Harbor, Fl. 34684 727 - 804 -1760 fax: 1- 888 - 977 -1179 pressinc(Daol.com Page 1 of 2 Wells, Wayne From: PressInc @aol.com Sent: Sunday, May 17, 2009 10:57 AM To: Wells, Wayne Cc: HSullaiman @aol.com; Tefft, Robert; Ruud, Alan K; Coccia, Mike Subject: Re: FLD2008- 02005, 503 Marshall Street I shall pass this along to the property owner. In a message dated 5/15/2009 8:31:09 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time, Wayne.Wells @myClearwater.com writes: This application was last reviewed by the DRC on January 8, 2009, and was determined insufficient to move forward to the CDB. The provision of an adequate number of parking spaces appears to be the main issue for this application. Based on discussions with you, Hashim and your consultants, it appears that you are pursuing a "mixed -use" of retail on the ground floor and a dwelling on the second floor. However, it has been over four months since the last DRC meeting. This project appears to be again stalled and movement one way or another is necessary. The following actions appear appropriate at this time: A. Withdraw the application; or B. Respond to the DRC comments and resubmit for additional DRC review. Should you decide to pursue Option A, a letter withdrawing the application must be submitted to me no later than June 9, 2009. Should you decide to pursue Option B, a revised application package (one original and 14 copies) must be submitted no later than noon on June 9, 2009, for review by the DRC on July 7, 2009 (if deemed sufficient and upon submission of revised application material by the appropriate time, the CDB meeting will be on August 18, 2009). If a revised application is not submitted by the aforementioned date, this application will be deemed withdrawn from further consideration by the City. There is still the active Code Enforcement case (CDC2003- 00559) that will need to be resolved should this application be withdrawn. Should you have any questions, feel free to call or email me. Wayne M. Wells, AICP Planner III City of Clearwater 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, FL 33756 -5520 Phone: 727- 562 -4504 Fax: 727 - 562 -4865 Todd. Pressman Pressman. & Associates,. Inc. Governmental and Public Affairs P.O. Box 6015 5/17/2009 Page 2 of 2 Palm Harbor, FL 34684 727 - 804 -1760 Fx. (888) 977 -1179 E -MAIL: Pressinc @aol.Com Recession -proof vacation ideas. Find free things to do in the U.S. 5/17/2009 Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Friday,. May 15, 2009.8:31 AM To: Todd. Pressman (E -mail) Cc: 'hsuIlaiman @aol.com; Tefft, Robert; Ruud, Alan. K; Coccia, Mike Subject: FLD2008- 02005, 503. Marshall. Street Todd. - This application was last reviewed by the DRC. on January 8, 2009, and was determined insufficient to move forward to the CDB. The provision. of an adequate number of parking spaces appears. to be the main issue for this application.. Based on discussions with you, Hashim and your consultants, it appears that you are pursuing a "mixed -use" of retail on the ground floor and a dwelling on. the second floor. However,. it has been over four months since the. last DRC meeting... This project appears to be again stalled and movement one way or another is necessary.. The following actions appear appropriate at this time: A. Withdraw the application; or B. Respond to the DRC comments and resubmit for additional. DRC review. Should you decide to pursue Option A, a letter withdrawing the application must be submitted to me no later than June 9, 2009. Should you decide to pursue Option B, a revised application package (one original and 14 copies) must be submitted no later than noon on June 9, 2009, for review by the DRC on July 7, 2009 (if deemed sufficient and upon submission of revised application material. by the appropriate time,. the CDB meeting will be on August 18,. 2009).. If a revised application is not submitted by the aforementioned. date, this application will be deemed withdrawn from, further consideration by the City. . There is still the active. Code Enforcement case (CDC2003- 00559) that will need to be resolved should this application be withdrawn. Should you have any questions, feel free to call or email me. Wayne M. Wells, AICP Planner III City. of Clearwater 100 South. Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, FL 33756 -5520 Phone: 727- 562 -4504 Fax: 727 - 562 -4865 i • Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 2009 8:28 AM To: Todd Pressman (E -mail) Subject: FLD2008- 02005, 503 Marshall Street Todd - Attached are the draft DRC comments for the January 8, 2009, DRC meeting at 11:10 am in our offices. Wayne M. Wells, A/CP Planner III City of Clearwater 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, FL 33756 -5520 Phone: 727 - 562 -4504 Fax: 727 - 562 -4865 ,. draft 1.8.09 c action agenda Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Monday, November 17, 2008 6:40 PM To: Todd Pressman (E -mail) Subject: FLD2008- 02005, 503 Marshall Street Todd - Today you dropped off a resubmittal for this project. Please be aware that I have scheduled this application for review by the DRC at its January 8, 2009, meeting. While the application materials will be distributed to the DRC on December. 9, 2008, the submitted information is lacking in detail for the DRC to adequately review the application, for the following reasons: 1. Page 1 of the application has an incorrect parcel number; 2. Page 1 of the application lacks a "proposed use'; 3. Page 1 of the application lacks a detailed description of the request. The prior submission of this application, as reviewed by the DRC, was "Flexible Development approval to permit offices in the Commercial (C) District with a reduction to lot area from 10,000 to 7,720 square feet, a reduction to lot width along N. Ft. Harrison Avenue (west) from 100 to 50.81 feet, reductions to the front (north) setback from 25 to 18. feet (to building) and to three feet (to pavement), a reduction to the front (west) setback from 25 feet to 22 feet (to pavement), a reduction to the side (east) setback from 10 feet to 0.4 feet (to existing building), reductions to the side (south) setback from 10 feet to 1.3 feet (to existing building) and to zero feet (to pavement), an increase to building height for a decorative tower from 25 feet to xx feet and a reduction to required parking from 14 spaces (four spaces /1,000 square feet) to nine spaces (2.647 spaces /1,000 square feet), as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2- 704.C; and a reduction to the landscape buffer along Marshall Street (north) from 10 to three feet (to pavement), a reduction to the landscape buffer along the east property line from five to 0.4 feet (to existing building) and a reduction to the landscape buffer along the south property line from five to 1.3 feet (to existing building) and to zero feet (to pavement), as a Comprehensive Landscape Program; under the provisions of Section 3- 1202.G." The prior submitted information, reviewed by the DRC at its March 6, 2008, meeting had a much more detailed request. 4. On Page 4 of the application, the following is not complete: ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF STORMWATER PLAN REQUIREMENTS (Applicant must initial one of the following): Stormwater plan as noted above is included. _Stormwater plan is not required and explanation narrative is attached. At a minimum, a grading plan and finished floor elevations shall be provided. 5. On Page 7 of the application, the following is not complete: Acknowledgement of traffic impact study requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following): _Traffic Impact Study is included. The study must include a summary table of pre- and post - development levels of service. for all roadway legs and each turning movement at all intersections identified in the Scoping Meeting. _Traffic Impact Study is not required. 6. On Page 7 of the application, the following is not complete: Acknowledgement of fire flow calculations /water study requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following): _Fire Flow Calculations/Water Study is included. _Fire Flow Calculations/Water Study is not required. 7. Page 8 of the application, Affidavit to Authorize Agent, has not been submitted (needs to be completed to authorize you as the agent). 8. For a retail sales and services use, parking is based on the gross floor area of the building. The submitted information indicates a total of 2,950. square feet of gross floor area. At five parking spaces per 1,000 square feet, a total of 15 parking spaces are required. The Site Data on Sheet C1/7 incorrectly indicates the required parking. Page 1 of the application indicates the request includes a reduction of parking. No Parking Demand Study has been submitted with findings demonstrating whether or not the deviation to the parking standard is acceptable. 9. Dimensions and written information on Sheet C4/7 are unreadable. 10. A black and white Sheet C7/7 has been submitted. Need one colored version for the original case file. Additionally, please submit paint samples /swatches for the proposed exterior colors. It is recommended to revise the application material packages with at least the above changes no later than noon on Monday, December 8, 2008. Wayne M. Wells, AICP Planner III City of Clearwater • • 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, FL 33756 -5520 Phone: 727 - 562 -4504 Fax: 727-562-4865 C Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Friday, October 31, 2008 4:50 PM To: 'Press Inc @aol.com' Subject: Pressman: Hashim Sulliaum on alt. 19 See attached. - - - -- Original Message---- - From: PressInc @aol.com [mailto:PressInc @ aol.com] Sent: Friday, October 31, 2008 3:06 PM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: Re: Pressman: Hashim Sulliaum on alt.19 Thanks. How many copies of plans and the responses do you need for the resubmit? Page 1 of 1 In a message dated 10/31/2008 1:49:01 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, Wayne.Wells @myClearwater.com writes: Todd - See attached. Wayne - - - -- Original Message---- - From: PressInc @aol.com [mailto:PressInc @ aol.com] Sent: Friday, October 31, 2008 1:28 PM Todd Pressman, President, Pressman & Assoc., Inc. 28870 U.S. Highway 19, N., #300. Clearwater,. FL 33761 Cell, 727 - 804 -1760. Ofc. 727- 726- 8683. Fx. 727- 669 -8114. Alt. Fx. 727 - 725 -2933 Plan your next getaway with AOL Travel. Check out Today's Hot 5 Travel Deals! 10/31/2008 <.,_ ,' � • Page 1 of 2 Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Friday, October 31, 2008 1:49 PM To: 'Press Inc @aol.com' Subject: Pressman: Hashim Sulliaum on alt.19 Todd - See attached. Wayne - - - -- Original Message---- - From: PressInc @aol.com [mailto:PressInc @aol.com] Sent: Friday, October 31, 2008 1:28 PM To: Wells, Wayne Cc: HSullaiman @aol.com Subject: Re: Pressman: Hashim Sulliaum on alt.19 Wayne or Hashim, do either of you have the last DRC comments? Wayne, how many copies of plans and responses to DRC do you need. Thanks. In a message dated 10/30/2008 9:45:15 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time, Wayne.Wells @myClearwater.com writes: Todd - Attached is a prior email that outlined what is necessary. Wayne - - - -- Original Message---- - From: 7278041760 [mailto:pressinc @ aol.com] Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2008 4:17 PM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: Pressman: Hashim Sulliaum on alt.19 At this point with minor plan changes - what do you need for re- submittal? Thanks. Sent via Verizon smart phone Todd Pressman, President, Pressman & Associates, Inc. 28870 U.S. Hwy 19, N. #300 Clearwater, FI 33761 ofc. 727 - 726 -8683 (VOTE) cell. 727 - 804 -1760 10/31/2008 . � Page 2 of 2 0 0 Todd Pressman, President, Pressman & Assoc., Inc. 28870 U.S. Highway 19, N., #300. Clearwater, FL 33761 Cell, 727- 804 -1760. Ofc. 727 - 726 -8683. Fx. 727- 669 -8114. Alt. Fx. 727 - 725 -2933 Plan your next getaway with AOL Travel. Check out T_o...day_'.s......_Hot._5 Travel Deals.!. 10/31/2008 Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2008 9:45 AM To: '7278041760' Subject: Pressman: Hashim Sulliaum on alt.19 H. Sullaiman - itatus 10.13.08. Todd - Attached is a prior email that outlined what is necessary. Wayne - - - -- Original Message ----- From:.7278041760 [mailto:pressinc @aol.com] Sent:.Tuesday, October 28, 2008 4:17 PM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: Pressman: Hashim Sulliaum on alt.19 At this point with minor plan changes -.what do you need for re- submittal? Thanks. Sent via Verizon smart phone Todd Pressman, President, Pressman &.Associates, Inc. 28870.U.S. Hwy. 19, N.. #300 Clearwater, F1 33761 ofc. 727 - 726 -8683 (VOTE) cell. 727 - 804 -1760 1 Wells, Wayne From: 7278041760 [pressinc @aol.com] Sent: Monday, October 13, 2008 12:41 PM To: Wells, Wayne; hsullaiman @aol.com Cc: Tefft, Robert; Press Inc @aol.com; Ruud, Alan K; Coccia, Mike Subject: RE: FLD2008- 02005, 503 Marshall Street Hashim and I have been working very hard to make the site.work well. We are actively working toward a resubmittal. Thanks for the direction and communication. Sent via Verizon smart phone Todd Pressman, President, Pressman & Associates, Inc. 28870 U.S. Hwy 19, N. #300 Clearwater, Fl 33761 ofc. 727 - 726 -8683 (VOTE) cell. 727 - 804 -1760 ----- Original.Message ----- From: <Wayne.Wells @myClearwater.com> Sent: Monday, October 13, 2008 10:27 AM To: hsullaiman @aol.com <hsullaiman @aol.com> Cc: Robert.Tefft @MyClearwater.com < Robert.Tefft @MyClearwater.com >; PressInc @aol.com <PressInc @aol.com >; Alan.Ruud @myClearwater.com <Alan.Ruud @myClearwater.com >; mike.coccia @myclearwater.com <mike.coccia @myclearwater.com> Subject: FLD2008- 02005, 503 Marshall Street Hashim - This application was reviewed by the DRC on March 6, 2008, and was determined insufficient to move forward to the CDB. It is my understanding that attempts to "acquire" additional parking on adjacent property has not occurred. My last communication with Todd Pressman on this application was in June 2008. The provision of an adequate number of. parking spaces appears to be the main issue for this.application. This project appears stalled and movement one way or another is necessary. The following actions appear appropriate at this time: A. Withdraw the application; or B. Respond to the DRC comments and resubmit for additional DRC review. A possibility of Option B is that, if deemed sufficient to move forward based on the revised application, staff may not support the application and recommend denial. The CDB ultimately will make a decision based on the merits of the application and the facts and conclusions of law after a public hearing. Should you decide to pursue Option B, a revised application package (one.original.and 14 copies) will need to be submitted no later than November 13, 2008, for review by the DRC on December 4, 2008 (if deemed sufficient and upon submission of revised application material by the appropriate time, the CDB meeting will be on January 20, 2009). If a revised application is not submitted this date, this application will be deemed withdrawn from further consideration by the City. Alternately, a letter withdrawing the application (Option A) may be submitted to me no later than November 13, 2008. There is still the active Code Enforcement case (CDC2003- 00559) that will need to be resolved'should this application be withdrawn. Should you have any questions, feel free to call or email me. 1 Wayne M. Wells, AICP Planner III City of Clearwater 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, FL 33756 -5520 Phone: 727- 562 -4504 Fax: 727 - 562 -4865 FLAGS (XAOL- GOODCHECK -DONE • XAOL- RECEIVED.XAOL- GOOD)) • C. Wells, Wayne • From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Monday, October 13, 2008 10:27 AM To: 'hsullaiman @aol.com' Cc: Tefft, Robert; 'Press Inc @aol.com';. Ruud, Alan K; Coccia, Mike Subject: FLD2008- 02005, 503 Marshall Street Hashim - This application was reviewed by the DRC on March 6, 2008, and was determined insufficient to move forward to the CDB. It is my understanding that attempts to "acquire" additional parking on adjacent property has not occurred. My last communication with Todd. Pressman on this application was in June 2008. The provision of an. adequate number of parking spaces appears to be the main issue for this. application. This project appears stalled and movement one way or another is necessary. The following actions appear appropriate at this. time: A. Withdraw the application; or B. Respond to the DRC comments and resubmit for additional DRC review. A possibility of Option B is that, if deemed sufficient to move forward based on the revised application, staff may not support the application and recommend denial. The CDB ultimately will make a decision based on the merits of the application and the facts and conclusions. of law after a public hearing. Should you decide to pursue Option B, a revised application package (one original and 14 copies) will need to be submitted no later than November 13, 2008, for review by the DRC on December 4, 2008 (if deemed sufficient and upon submission of revised application material by the appropriate time, the CDB meeting will be on January 20, 2009). If a revised application is not submitted this date, this application will be deemed withdrawn from further consideration by the City. Alternately, a letter withdrawing the application. (Option A) may be submitted to me no later than November 13, 2008. There is still the active Code Enforcement case (CDC2003- 00559) that will need to be resolved should this application be withdrawn. Should you have any questions, feel free to call or email me. Wayne M. Wells, AICP Planner III City of Clearwater 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, FL 33756 -5520 Phone: 727 - 562 -4504 Fax: 727 - 562 -4865 Page 1 of 1 Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Sunday, June 22, 2008 5:21 PM To: 'Press Inc @aol.com' Subject: Pressman: Hashim Sulliaum /N. US Alt. 19/FLD2008- 02005 -5 Todd - Right now I do not have anything on my schedule for Monday.. We can meet.. What time do you think you will be down here? Wayne - - --- Original Message ---- -. From: PressInc @aol.com [mailto:PressInc @aol.com] Sent: Sunday, June 22, 2008 11:53 AM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: Pressman: Hashim Sulliaum /N.. US Alt. 19/FLD2008- 02005 -5. Wayne, just found out I will be down there Monday - any time for 15 minutes max. to meet on this? Thanks. I know you're busy and I will keep it short: Wayne, we. met with the adjacent owner and that went very. well. Hashim has a new plan with their property "involvement I'd like to bring it the new plan by for just a few minutes, get your initial and first blush impression only, . and then understand according to you, what needs to be done next (I assume answer all the DRC questions and re- file...). Can you give me a few days and times next week that are good for you? I am good Monday,. Wednesday I am OK except a 1 PM meeting in Pasco; Thursday, outside of a. 11 am meeting in South. Hillsborough. Thanks.. Todd Pressman,. President,. Pressman & Assoc.,. Inc.. 28870 U.S. Highway 19, N., #300 Clearwater,. FL 33761 Cell, 727- 804 - 1760. Ofc. 727 - 726- 8683., Fx.. 727 - 669 - 8114. Alt.. Fx. 727- 725 -2933 Gas prices getting you down? Search AOL Autos for fuel - efficient used cars. 6/22/2008 Page 1. of 1 Wells, Wayne From: Presslnc @aol.com Sent: Friday, June 20, 2008 3:45 PM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: Pressman: Hasim Sullaiam /N. US Alt. 19/FLD2008- 02005 -503 Marshall Street Wayne, we met with the adjacent owner and that went very well. Hashim has a new plan with their property "involvement". I'd like to bring it the new plan by for just a few minutes, get your initial and first blush impression only, and then understand according to you, what needs to be done next (I assume answer all the DRC questions and re- file...). Can you give me a few days and times next week that are good for you? I am good Monday; Wednesday I am OK except a 1 PM meeting in Pasco; Thursday, outside of a 1lam meeting in South Hillsborough. Thanks. Todd Pressman, President, Pressman & Assoc., Inc. 28870 U.S. Highway 19, N., #300 Clearwater, FL 33761 Cell, 727 - 804 - 1760.. Ofc.. 727 - 726- 8683.. Fx. 727- 669 - 8114. Alt. Fx. , 727- 725 -2933 Gas prices getting you down? Search AOL Autos for fuel - efficient used cars. 6/22/2008 Wells, Wayne From: 7278041760. [pressinc @aol.com] Sent: Wednesday, April 30,2008.10:05 AM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: RE: Todd: Small Office Project /503. Marshall street 1504 Garden Inc. FLD 2008 -02 -005 You have articulated this.extremely. well. We. are currently working on the options. you communicate here. However, it is. always my direction to make. Wayne. Wells,. planner,. happy (...or any planner I am working. with...). . Rays.seem to be doing very well! Might.have to go to a game! - - - -- Original. Message---- - From: <Wayne.Wells @myClearwater.com> Sent: Wednesday,.April.30,.2008.8:59 AM To: PressInc @aol.com <PressInc @aol.com> Subject: Todd:.Small Office. Project /503. Marshall street 1504 Garden Inc. FLD 2008 -02 -005 Todd Currently the application is.to permit.offices in this.building with a parking reduction from 14 spaces (4 spaces /1000 sf) to nine spaces. (2.647. spaces /1000 sf). The elimination of 500 square feet.of.floor area would reduce the proposed floor area to 2900 square feet and reduce the required parking.to 12 parking spaces.. There would still be. only nine. parking spaces.provided...Does the reduction in floor area help? Yes. Does it reduce the disparity between the number of.parking spaces required and the number of spaces provided? Yes.. As the offices. are speculative today (no known users), the Parking Demand Study must still justify the requested reduction in the number.of.parking spaces. So far, the Study has. not. Is there any ability to, even with the proposed elimination of the 500 square feet.of.floor area,.to.have shared parking for employees on an adjacent property where there is excess parking (more. parking provided than that. required to be. provided) , such as the property to.the south? If the required parking can be provided with additional parking spaces in an appropriate off -site location in a shared circumstance, then there is no parking reduction necessary.. This is not a question of what makes. Wayne feel good. It is. a question of whether required parking is.being.provided to avoid creating.parking issues on -site or. in the neighborhood, shared parking on an off -site location or whether the Parking Demand Study adequately justifies the requested reduction. Wayne - - - -- Original Message---- - From: PressInc @aol.com [mailto:PressInc @aol.com] Sent: Friday, April 25, 2008.12:32 PM To: Wells, Wayne Subject:.Todd: Small Office. Project /503.Marshall.street 1504 Garden Inc. FLD.2008 -02 -005 Hashim,. the property owner, is.willing to literally cut out /remove 500. SF,.does that make you feel better about.the parking? Thanks Todd Pressman,. President,. Pressman & Assoc., Inc. 28870.U.S. Highway 19,.N.,. #300 Clearwater,. FL 33761 Cell, 727- 804 - 1760. Ofc..727- 726 -8683. Fx. 727 - 669 - 8114 A1t..Fx. 727- 725 -2933 0 • Page 1 of 1 Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2008 4:25 PM To: 'Presslnc @aol.com' Subject: RE: Pressman: Re: FLD2008 -02005 - 503 Marshall Street How about 3:00 pm on Thursday? - - - -- Original Message---- - From: PressInc @aol.com [mailto:PressInc @aol.com] Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2008 3:17 PM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: Re: Pressman: Re: FLD2008 -02005 - 503 Marshall Street I'll try later Thursday. Thanks. In a message dated 4/1/2008 8:46:08 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time, Wayne.Wells @myClearwater.com writes: Todd - The FLD application was deemed insufficient to move forward to the CDB. From at least a Planning standpoint, use of the building and parking are major, related issues. Yes, I am available to meet. I have some time later Thursday afternoon (I have DRC at 1:00 pm) and some time Friday afternoon (I have a meeting at 2:00 pm). Wayne - - - -- Original Message - - - -- Todd Pressman, President, Pressman & Assoc., Inc. 28870 U.S. Highway 19, N., #300 Clearwater, FL 33761 Cell, 727 - 804 -1760. Ofc. 727 - 726 -8683. Fx. 727 - 669 -8114. Alt. Fx. 727 - 725 -2933 Create a Home Theater Like the Pros. Watch the video on AOL Home. 4/2/2008 10 • Page 1 of 1 Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2008 8:46 AM To: 'Presslnc @aol.com' Subject: Pressman: Re: FLD2008 -02005 - 503 Marshall Street Todd - The FLD application was deemed insufficient to move forward to the CDB. From at least a Planning standpoint, use of the building and parking are major, related issues. Yes, I am available to meet. I have some time later Thursday afternoon (I have DRC at 1:00 pm) and some time Friday afternoon (I have a meeting at 2:00 pm). Wayne - - - -- Original Message---- - From: PressInc @aol.com [mailto:PressInc @aol.com] Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2008 7:54 AM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: Pressman: Re: FLD2008 -02005 - 503 Marshall Street Wayne, what is the current status on this - it appears frozen until the applicant gets all the materials in? It appears parking is the most difficult issue? Are you available to meet on this for a few minutes this week? Thanks. Todd Pressman, President, Pressman & Assoc., Inc. 28870 U.S. Highway 19, N., #300 Clearwater, FL 33761 Cell, 727 - 804 -1760. Ofc. 727 - 726 -8683. Fx. 727 - 669 -8114. Alt. Fx. 727 - 725 -2933 Create a Home Theater Like the Pros. Watch the video on AOL Home. 4/1/2008 • Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Sunday, March 02, 2008 7:12 PM To: 'hsullaiman @aol.com' Subject: FLD2008 -02005 - 503 Marshall Street Hashim - • Attached are the draft DRC comments for the March 6, 2008, DRC meeting at 9:35 am, to be held in our offices. Should you have any questions, feel free to contact me. Wayne M. Wells, AICP Planner III City of Clearwater 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, FL 33756 -5520 Phone: 727 - 562 -4504 Fax: 727 - 562 -4865 draft 3.6.08 c action agenda 0 0 Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2008 2:33 PM To: 'hsullaiman @aol.com' Subject: FLD2008 -02005 - 503 Marshall Street Hashim - Attached is a Letter of Completeness for the above referenced project, scheduled for the March 6, 2008, DRC meeting for a determination of sufficiency. The original letter is being mailed to you. Wayne M. Wells, AICP Planner III City of Clearwater 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, FL 33756 -5520 Phone: 727 - 562 -4504 Fax: 727 - 562 -4865 letter of pleteness 2.13.1 0 CITY OF CLEARWATER CO ater PLANNING DEPARTMENT MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE: (727) 562 -4567 FAX: (727),562-4576 W W W. MYCLEARWATER. COM February 13, 2008 Hashim Sullaiman 14927 Lake Forest Drive Lutz, F133559 VIA FAX: 813 - 433 -5553 RE: FLD2008 -02005 -- 503 MARSHALL ST -- Letter of Completeness Dear Hashim Sullaiman The Planning Staff has entered your application into the Department's filing system and assigned the case number: FLD2008- 02005. After a preliminary review of the submitted documents, staff has determined that the application is complete. The Development Review Committee (DRC) will review the application for sufficiency on March 06, 2008, in the Planning Department conference room - Room 216 - on the second floor of the Municipal Services Building. The building is located at 100 South Myrtle Avenue in downtown Clearwater. You will be contacted by the Planning Department's Administrative Analyst within one week prior to the meeting date for the approximate time that your case will be reviewed. You or your representative (as applicable) must be present to answer any questions that the DRC may have regarding your application. Additional comments may be generated by the DRC at the time of the meeting. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at 727 -562 -4504 or Wayne.Wells@myclearwater.com. Sincerely yours, M -!VA Wayne ells. AICP Planner III I.n11er nfCmmnlrlanncc - FI.n700R -07005 - 503 MAR.CHAI I .LT • s From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2008 6:57 PM To: 'hsullaiman @aol.com' Subject: FLD2008 -02005 - 503 Marshall Street Hashim - Attached is 'a Letter of Incompleteness for the above referenced project. The original letter is being mailed to you. Should you have any questions, feel free to call (562 -4504) or email me. Wayne M. Wells, A/CP Planner III City of Clearwater 10.0 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, FL 33756 -5520 Pho 727 -562 -4504 Fa.-. 727- 562 -4865 Letter of )mpleteness 2.7 February 07, 2008 Hashim Sullaiman 14927 Lake Forest Drive Lutz, Fl 33559 r CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE: (727) 562 -4567 FAX: (727) 562 -4576 W W W.MYCLEARWATER.COM VIA FAX: 813- 433 -5553 RE: FLD2008 -02005 -- 503 MARSHALL ST -- Letter of Incompleteness Dear Hashim Sullaiman : The Planning Staff has entered your application into the Department's filing system and assigned the case number: FLD2008- 02005. After a preliminary review of the submitted documents, staff has determined that the application is Incomplete with the following comments. 1. As part of the proposed stormwatc etention/retention area, include the outlet control structure. 2. Provide a tree inventory, prepared by a "certified arborist ", of all trees 4" DBH or greater, reflecting size, canopy (drip lines) and condition of such trees. 3. Provide dimensions for the width of the driveway /drive aisle. 4. Show the location of existing public and private. utilities, including fire hydrants, stone and sanitary sewer lines, manholes and lift stations, gas and water lines. 5. Show on the civil site and landscape plans the sight visibility triangle at the intersection of N. Ft. Harrison Avenue and Marshall Street. 6. Must indicate on the civil and/or landscape plans the required and proposed perimeter landscape buffers. Note: Required buffers along N. Ft. Harrison Avenue and Marshall Street = 10 feet; Required buffers along the south and east property lines = five feet. 7. Provide a tree survey, including existing trees on site and within 25' of the adjacent site, by species, size (DBH 4" or greater), and location, including drip lines and indicating trees to be removed). 8. Landscape Plan must show the location, size, AND quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, indicated by a key relating to the plant schedule. Landscape plan must show the quantities of all plant materials to be planted in the various areas of the site. 9. Plant schedule with a key (symbol or label) indicating the size, description, specifications,' QUANTITIES (of all plant materials), and spacing requirements of all existing and proposed landscape materials, including botanical and common names. Schedule must include the total quantities for VS and variegated jasmine (include in the Schedule). Letter of Incompleteness - FLD2008 -02005 - 503 MARSHALL ST February 07, 2008 0 CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE: (727) 562 -4567 FAX: (727) 562 -4576 W W W . MYCLEARW ATER. C OM 10. On Page 7 of the application, acknowledgement of traffic impact study requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following): Traffic Impact Study is included. The study must include a summary table of pre- and post - development levels of service for all roadway legs and each turning movement at all intersections identified in the Scoping Meeting. Traffic Impact Study is not required. It is noted that the one of the above must be INITIALED, not checked. However, it is indicated that a traffic study is included, but none was submitted. 11. On Page 7 of the Application, acknowledgement of fire flow calculations /water study requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following): Fire Flow Calculations /Water Study is included. Fire Flow Calculations /Water Study is not required. It is noted that the one of the above must be INITIALED, not checked. 12. A Comprehensive Landscape Program application has been submitted: a. It does not indicate why such is being submitted, such as what reductions to landscape requirements are being requested to be reduced. Landscape associated with the Comprehensive Landscape Program shall exceed minimum Code requirements to offset the areas where minimum Code will not be met. b. Must provide responses to the criteria listed. A "yes" answer is insufficient. c. Application must be signed and notarized. Section 4 -202 of the Community Development Code states that if an application is deemed incomplete, the deficiencies of the application shall be specified by Staff. No further development review action shall be taken until the deficiencies are corrected and the application is deemed complete. Please resubmit by noon on Wednesday, February 13, 2008. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at 727 -562 -4504 or Wayne.Wells@myclearwater.com. Sincerely yours, B�' V r� �� /�i ^✓lam Y � Wavne ells Plann III Letter of Incompleteness - FLD2608 -01005 - 503 MARSHALL ST MEMORANDUM TO: Community Development Board / FROM: Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Planner III 1 v7 DATE: April 20, 2010 RE: FLD2008- 02005, 503 Marshall Street After discussions with the owner /applicant (Hashim Sulliaman) regarding the conditions of approval, Staff has agreed to modify the time frame in Condition #1 to ensure adequate time is available for the applicant's consultant to prepare plans for a building permit. Modifying language that is deleted is men and new language is underlined. Conditions of Approval: 1. That application for a building permit to construct the approved project be submitted no later than OetebeFDecember 20, 2010. Failure to submit for these permits within this time frame shall cause this Flexible Development approval by the CDB to be null and void and cause compliance action to be initiated; 2. That, prior to the issuance of any permits, a Declaration of Unity of Title be approved and recorded in the public records; 3. That use of the building be for a retail sales and services use on the first floor and one attached dwelling on the second floor; 4. That the final design and color of the building be consistent with the elevations approved by the CDB; 5. That freestanding signage be limited to monument -style signs, be a maximum height of six feet and be consistent with the color and materials of the building; 6. That electric and communication lines on -site be placed underground; 7. That, prior to the issuance of any permits, appropriate agreements with the City and the abutting property owner be approved and recorded, as necessary, to allow tenants of this site to share the dumpster on the property to the east. Additionally, prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy /Completion for this site, the off -site dumpster shall be upgraded to meet City requirements for design and location; 8. That, prior to the issuance of the building permit, the location and visibility of electric equipment (electric panels, boxes and meters) be reviewed and, if located exterior to the building where visible from adjacent roadways or properties, be painted the same color as the building; 9. That, prior to the issuance of a building permit, outside mechanical equipment be reviewed for Code requirements for location and screening; and 10. That, prior to the issuance of any permit, all requirements of the General Engineering, Environmental Engineering, Stormwater Engineering, Traffic Engineering and Fire Departments be addressed. S.• (Planning DepartmentlC D BIFLEX (FLD) (Pending cases)Up for the next CDBWarshall 503 Marshall Building (C) 2010.04 - 4.20.10 CDB - WWWemo to CDB -Revised Conditions of Approva14.20.10. docx 0 0 CDB Meeting Date: Apri120, 2010 Case Number: FLD2008 -02005 Agenda Item: D.1. Owners /Applicant: 1504 Garden Inc. ( Hashim Sullaiman) Representative: Todd Pressman or Hashim Sullaiman Address: 503 Marshall Street CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT GENERAL INFORMATION: R' GIN A REQUEST: Flexible Development application to permit a Mixed Use (1,610 square feet of Retail Sales and Services on the first floor and one Attached Dwelling on the second floor) in the Commercial (C) District with a lot area of 7,720 square feet, a lot width of 50.81 feet along N. Ft. Harrison Avenue (west) and 149.95 feet along Marshall Street (north), a front (west) setback of 14.6 feet (to pavement), a front (north) setback of 18 feet (to building), eight feet (to sidewalk) and 4.96 feet (to pavement), a side (east) setback of 0.4 feet (to existing building) and 12.93 feet (to pavement), a side (south) setback of one -foot (to existing building) and zero feet (to pavement), a building height of 31 feet (to top of decorative tower) and 10 parking spaces, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project under the provisions of Community Development Code (CDC) Section 2- 704.C; as well as a north landscape buffer width along Marshall Street of 4.96 feet (to pavement), an east landscape buffer width of 0.4 feet (to existing building), a south landscape buffer width of zero feet (to pavement) and a north foundation landscape width of four feet, as a Comprehensive Landscape Program under the provisions of CDC Section 3- 1202.G. CURRENT ZONING: Commercial (C) District CURRENT FUTURE LAND USE CATEGORY: Commercial General (CG) PROPERTY USE: Current Use: Vacant two -story commercial building and vacant duplex attached dwelling building Proposed Use: Mixed Use (1,610 square feet of Retail Sales and Services on the first floor and one Attached Dwelling on the second floor) EXISTING North: Commercial (C) District Retail Sales and Services SURROUNDING South: Commercial (C) District Social & Community Center ZONING AND USES: East: Commercial (C) District Retail Sales and Services West: Commercial (C) District Attached Dwellings Community Development Board — April 20, 2010 FLD2008 -02005 — Page 1 of 11 ANALYSIS: Site Location and Existing Conditions: The 0.18 acres located at the southeast corner of North Ft. Harrison Avenue and Marshall Street. The subject property is currently developed with a two -story commercial building (presently vacant) on the eastern portion of the site and an attached dwelling building (duplex — presently vacant) on the western portion of the site. The only existing parking area for this site is north of the two -story commercial building, which requires vehicles to back into Marshall Street. The subject site has 50.81 feet of frontage along N. Ft. Harrison Avenue (west) and 149.95 feet of frontage along Marshall Street (north). Code Compliance issues were initiated for this site on February 5, 2003, when a Stop Work Order was issued for unpermitted demolition and construction within the two -story commercial building (CDC2003- 00559, which is still an active case). On January 18, 2005, the Community Development Board (CDB) approved Case FLD2004 -02010 with nine conditions of approval for the subject property, permitting retail sales and service uses on both floors of this commercial building. The approval of this project included 11 required parking spaces on the parcel directly south of this site at 1411 N. Ft. Harrison Avenue. Building Permit BCP2005 -06914 was submitted June 25, 2005, to facilitate the remodeling of the building and to construct the site improvements. This permit was never issued and was voided October 24, 2006. The applicant also lost the 11 parking spaces on the adjacent parcel due to proposed redevelopment of that parcel. This current application was filed February 4, 2008, in a second attempt to resolve the Code Compliance issue through the approval of an appropriate mix of use for the property. Retail sales uses exist to the north and east of the subject property. Detached dwellings exist on the west side of N. Ft. Harrison Avenue, north and south of Marshall Street. The property adjacent to the south at 1411 N. Ft. Harrison Avenue was previously approved by the CDB under Case FLS2007 -07035 for a Social /Community Center use, but no construction was completed on the project and Building Permit BCP2007 -08505 was voided, thereby placing that CDB approval into an expired status. There is presently no approved use for the parcel to the south. Development Proposal: The proposal is to demolish the duplex attached dwelling building on the west side of the site and convert the existing commercial building to a Mixed Use with retail sales and service use of 1,610 square feet on the first floor and one attached dwelling on the second floor. Mixed Use is permissible as a Flexible Development use in the Commercial (C) District, but this application is being processed as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project due to the proposed setbacks. While a mixed -use calculation of permitted intensity for this site would allow three dwelling units in addition to the ground floor retail sales use, the site is constrained by the site area, lot width (especially on the north/south axis) and the size and location of the existing two -story commercial building. Many potential uses have been analyzed for this site, with the proposed mixed use the best fit for the site, which is part of the reason for the length of time this application has been in the development review process. The redevelopment of this site will set a standard for this area and the adjoining properties will not suffer substantial detriment as a result of the proposed development. The proposal is consistent with the existing commercial character of the surrounding area and the mixed use is compatible with these adjacent land uses. Based on the proposed uses, 10 parking spaces are required and have been provided on -site, albeit with Community Development Board —April 20, 2010 FLD2008 -02005 — Page 2 of 11 0 0 deviations to setbacks and landscape buffers. There are two proposed driveways on Marshall Street to access the parking areas for these uses. The redevelopment of this site is otherwise impractical without the requested deviations to setbacks and landscape standards. This proposal is different from the previously approved Flexible Development application in 2005 (FLD2004- 02010) where off -site parking on the adjacent parcel to the south was necessary to meet Code requirements. This proposal is similar in design to the prior approved project from the standpoint of the parking lot and retention area on the west side of the building, including the proposed setbacks and landscape buffers. This proposal includes one parking space on the north side of the building in order to meet the parking requirements. The existing building has a building height of 23.5 feet to the flat roof deck. The proposal includes the construction of a decorative tower over the entrance to the retail use to give the building visual interest. The top of the decorative tower is at a building height of 31 feet, which has been included in the advertised request. The proposed height of this tower is on the lower end of the range of allowable building height for a mixed use. Primary access from the main, west parking area to the retail sales use on the first floor is proposed on the northwest corner of the upgraded building. Access to the residential unit on the second floor is at the northeast corner of the building. There is a small building addition on the west side of the north building fagade, which will square off the building at this location. The exterior base and body colors of the building will be tan/ochre at the building tower and along the base of the building and ivory for the majority of the building. Decorative trim on the building will be forest green and white, while the door and window frames will be a forest green. The decorative tower will have dimensional shingles of a medium to dark color. There is a stormwater retention pond proposed on the west side of the site between the parking lot and the N. Ft. Harrison Avenue property line. In order to provide the required pond volume, a retaining wall is proposed to the west of the parking lot. This retaining wall location provides sufficient room to plant a hedge to shield the parking from views along N. Ft. Harrison Avenue. There exist overhead utilities along the Marshall Street right -of -way that will remain, but the utility drops to this building will be placed underground on -site. Density /Intensity: Pursuant to the Countywide Future Land Use Plan and CDC Section 2- 701.1, the maximum density for properties with a designation of Commercial General is 24 dwelling units per acre and the maximum Floor Area Ratio (FAR) is 0.55. A "mixed use" calculation to ascertain the maximum allowable intensity was prepared. Based on the 1,610 square feet of commercial floor area proposed for the ground floor, the net lot acreage would allow a maximum of three dwelling units. The proposal is only for one dwelling unit. As such, the proposed FAR (based on the original lot square footage) is 0.208 and the proposed density is 7.14 units /acre (based on the net lot acreage), which meets the maximum intensity established under the Commercial General land use. Impervious Surface Ratio (ISR): Pursuant to CDC Section 2- 701.1, the maximum allowable ISR is 0.95. The proposed ISR is 0.729, which is consistent with the Code provisions. Minimum Lot Area and Width: Pursuant to CDC Table 2 -704, there is no minimum required lot area or lot width for a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project. However, for a point of Community Development Board — April 20, 2010 FLD2008 -02005 — Page 3 of 11 0 • comparison, the minimum lot area for a mixed use can range between 5,000 — 10,000 square feet. The proposed site is 7,720 square feet of lot area. Pursuant to the same Table, the minimum lot width for a mixed use can range between 50 — 100 feet. The lot width along Marshall Street (north) is 149.95 feet and 50.81 feet of lot width along N. Ft. Harrison Avenue (west). The proposal meets and/or exceeds these Code provisions. Minimum Setbacks: Pursuant to CDC Table 2 -704, there are no minimum required setbacks for a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project. However, for a point of comparison, the minimum setbacks for a mixed use can range for front setbacks from 15 — 25 feet and for side setbacks from 0 — 10 feet (corner lots have only front and side setback requirements). The proposal includes a front (west) setback of 14.6 feet (to pavement), a front (north) setback of 18 feet (to building), eight feet (to sidewalk) and 4.96 feet (to pavement), a side (east) setback of 0.4 feet (to existing building) and 12.93 feet (to pavement) and a side (south) setback of one -foot (to existing building) and zero feet (to pavement). The site is relatively small, with only 7,720 square feet in area and only 50.81 feet of lot width along N. Ft. Harrison Avenue. The applicant proposes to remodel the existing two -story building on the east side of the site for a mixed use for a retail sales use on the first floor and an attached dwelling on the second floor. The location of this existing building is a design constraint for the site. Many potential uses have been analyzed for this site, with the proposed mixed use the best fit for the site. The existing building is nonconforming to the required front and side setbacks and will be deemed conforming with the approval of this application. In order to meet required parking and to meet the dimensional requirements for parking, the proposal includes reductions to setbacks. The redevelopment of this site is otherwise impractical without the requested deviations to setbacks. It is important to note that the proposal includes the removal of nonconforming parking spaces that back into the Marshall Street right -of -way, replacing this parking with spaces that meet current Code design standards. While the required setbacks are not being met, the proposal is in harmony with the scale, bulk and character of adjacent properties. Similar setbacks exist for the retail sales building and parking lot across Marshall Street from this site (constructed in 1996). The reduced setbacks along the street frontages still permit the installation of landscape buffering (albeit at a reduced buffer width). The proposal with its reduced setbacks will not hinder or discourage the development and use of adjacent land and buildings. The parking lot to the west of the existing building is similar in design and location, with the same reduced setbacks, as approved for Case FLD2004 -02010 in 2005. Maximum Building Height: Pursuant to CDC Table 2 -704, there is no maximum height for a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project. However, for a point of comparison, the maximum height for a mixed use can range from 25 — 50 feet. The proposal has been advertised with a maximum building height of 31 feet (to the top of a decorative tower). The building height to the top of the flat roof is 23.5 feet, which is less than the range for a mixed use. The proposed decorative tower over the entrance to the retail sales use will give the building visual interest. The proposed height of this tower is on the lower end of the range of allowable building height for a mixed use. Minimum Off - Street Parking: Pursuant to CDC Table 2 -704, the minimum required parking for a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project is based on the specific uses proposed. Retail Community Development Board — April 20, 2010 FLD2008 -02005 — Page 4 of 11 • • sales uses can range between 4 — 5 spaces per 1,000 square feet as a Level 2 Flexible Development application. Parking for a dwelling is two spaces per unit. The required parking for the retail sales use is eight parking spaces. A total of 10 parking spaces are required and are being provided under this design. Nine parking spaces are proposed on the west side of the building and one parking space is proposed on the north side of the building. Presently, the only parking area for this site is north of the two -story commercial building, which requires vehicles to back into Marshall Street. Current Code does not permit back out parking into the right -of -way. This proposal will remove this existing parking area and provide two driveways on Marshall Street. The driveways and parking lots have been designed to meet Code design standards. The driveway locations have been approved by the City's Engineering Department. There is an existing sidewalk along N. Ft. Harrison Avenue that will be retained. A new sidewalk will be constructed for the site frontages along Marshall Street, increasing pedestrian safety. Mechanical Equipment: Pursuant to CDC Section 3- 201.D.1, all outside mechanical equipment must be screened so as not to be visible from public streets and/or abutting properties. Mechanical equipment will be located on top of the flat roof of the building or on the west side of the building. The parapets surrounding the roof may be insufficient to screen any mechanical equipment on the roof and additional screening may be required. This will be reviewed at time of the building permit submission. Sight Visibility Triangles: Pursuant to CDC Section 3- 904.A, to minimize hazards at the proposed driveways on Marshall Street and the street intersection of Marshall Street and N. Ft. Harrison Avenue, no structures or landscaping may be installed which will obstruct views at a level between 30 inches and eight feet above grade within 20 -foot sight visibility triangles. Shrubbery planted within the sight visibility triangles will need to be maintained to meet the Code requirements. Utilities: Pursuant to CDC Section 3 -911, for development that does not involve a subdivision, all utilities including individual distribution lines must be installed underground unless such undergrounding is not practicable. Electric and communication lines for this mixed use building will be installed underground on -site in compliance with this requirement. There exist overhead utility lines within the right -of -way along Marshall Street, which will remain overhead. It is unknown of the location of proposed electric panels, boxes and meters. If located exterior to the building, to ensure views are minimized, this electrical equipment should be painted the same color as the building. The location and potential views of such electrical equipment will be addressed at the building permit stage. Landscaping_ Pursuant to CDC Section 3- 1202.13, there is a required 15 -foot wide perimeter buffers along N. Ft. Harrison Avenue, a 10 -foot wide perimeter buffer along Marshall Street and a five -foot wide perimeter buffer along the east and south sides of the property. The proposal includes reductions to these perimeter buffers similar to the setback reductions (see above discussion under Minimum Setbacks), but the perimeter buffers proposed are greater than the buffers that exist today (none). The proposal includes a reduction to the foundation planting area along the north side of the building from five to four feet. A foundation planting area on the west Community Development Board —April 20, 2010 FLD2008 -02005 — Page 5 of 11 0 9 side of the building exceeds the required minimum five -foot width. No interior landscape area is required for this project, as the vehicular use area is less than 4,000 square feet. A stormwater retention pond is proposed on the west side of the side between the parking lot and the N. Ft. Harrison Avenue property line. All existing unhealthy trees will be removed. Visibility triangle provisions and the existence of overhead utilities along Marshall Street restrict the location of proposed trees. A Comprehensive Landscape Program has been submitted and proposed landscaping has been increased beyond minimum Code requirements in certain areas of the site to offset the inability to plant landscaping in other areas of the site. The site will be planted with a various trees (Little Gem Magnolia, bald cypress, ligustrum tree, crape myrtle and cabbage palm), shrubs (Indian hawthorn and sandankwa viburnum) and ground covers and ornamental plants (juniper, flax lily, African iris and muhly grass). The landscape treatment proposed for this site will make this site stand out in an area generally devoid of landscaping to assist with softening and reducing building massing and the screening of vehicular use areas. Solid Waste: The proposal includes utilizing existing dumpsters located on the parcel to the east, which is also owned by the applicant, for trash produced from this site. Use of these dumpsters will require appropriate agreements with the City and the abutting property owner to ensure continued use of these off -site trash containers. The off -site dumpster(s) will need to be upgraded with appropriate building permits and be properly located and screened to meet City requirements prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for this site. The proposal has been found to be acceptable by the City's Solid Waste Department. Si rg_iage: The proposal includes a six -foot high, monument -style freestanding sign on the west side of the site. Such future monument -style freestanding sign should be designed to match the exterior materials and color of the building. Attached signage must meet Code requirements. Code Enforcement Analysis: There is still an active Code Enforcement case for this property, initiated on this site on February 5, 2003, when a Stop Work Order was issued for unpermitted demolition and construction within the two -story commercial building (CDC2003- 00559). Community Development Board —April 20, 2010 FLD2008 -02005 — Page 6 of 11 • COMPLIANCE WITH STANDARDS AND CRITERIA: The following table depicts the consistency of the development proposal with the standards as per CDC Tables 2 -701.1 and 2- 704: Based on a "mixed use" calculation; See analysis in Staff Report See analysis in Staff Report Community Development Board — April 20, 2010 FLD2008 -02005 — Page 7 of 11 Standard Proposed Consistent Inconsistent Density 24 dwelling units per acre One dwelling unit (7.14 X dwelling units per acre Floor Area Ratio (FAR) 0.55 1,610 square feet (0.208 X1 FAR) Impervious Surface 0.95 0.729 X2 Ratio Minimum Lot Area Comprehensive Infill 7,720 sq. ft. X2 Redevelopment Project: N/A Mixed Use: 5,000 — 10,000 sf Minimum Lot Width Comprehensive Infill Marshall Street: 149.95 feet X2 Redevelopment Project: N/A S. Ft. Harrison Avenue: Mixed Use: 50 — 100 feet 50.81 feet Minimum Setbacks Front: Comprehensive Infill Marshall Street: 18 feet (to X2 Redevelopment building), eight feet (to Project: N/A sidewalk) and 4.96 feet (to Mixed Use: 15 — 25 pavement) feet S. Ft. Harrison Avenue: 14.6 feet (to pavement) Side: Comprehensive Infill East: 0.4 feet (to existing X Redevelopment building) and 12.93 feet (to Project: N/A pavement) Mixed Use: 0 — 16 feet South: one -foot (to existing building) and zero feet (to pavement) Maximum Height Comprehensive Infill 31 feet (to top of decorative X2 Redevelopment Project: N/A tower) and 23.5 feet (to top Mixed Use: 25 — 50 feet of flat roof) Minimum Comprehensive Infill 10 parking spaces X2 Off - Street Parking Redevelopment Project: N/A Mixed Use: 4 — 5 spaces per 1,000 square feet and 2 spaces per residential unit (Required parking: 10 spaces) Based on a "mixed use" calculation; See analysis in Staff Report See analysis in Staff Report Community Development Board — April 20, 2010 FLD2008 -02005 — Page 7 of 11 L' • COMPLIANCE WITH FLEXIBILITY CRITERIA: The following table depicts the consistency of the development proposal with the Flexibility criteria as per CDC Section 2 -704.0 (Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project): Consistent I Inconsistent 1. The development or redevelopment is otherwise impractical without deviations from X the use and /or development standards set forth in this zoning district. 2. The development or redevelopment will be consistent with the goals and policies of X the Comprehensive Plan, as well as with the general purpose, intent and basic planning objectives of this Code, and with the intent and purpose of this zoning district. 3. The development or redevelopment will not impede the normal and orderly X1 development and improvement of surrounding properties. 4. Adjoining properties will not suffer substantial detriment as a result of the proposed X' development. 5. The proposed use shall otherwise be permitted by the underlying future land use X' category, be compatible with adjacent land uses, will not substantially alter the essential use characteristics of the neighborhood; and shall demonstrate compliance with one or more of the following objectives: a. The proposed use is permitted in this zoning district as a minimum standard, flexible standard or flexible development use; b. The proposed use would be a significant economic contributor to the City's economic base by diversifying the local economy or by creating jobs; c. The development proposal accommodates the expansion or redevelopment of an existing economic contributor; d. The proposed use provides for the provision of affordable housing; e. The proposed use provides for development or redevelopment in an area that is characterized by other similar development and where a land use plan amendment and rezoning would result in a spot land use or zoning designation; or f. The proposed use provides for the development of a new and /or preservation of a working waterfront use. 6. Flexibility with regard to use, lot width, required setbacks, height and off - street X' parking are justified based on demonstrated compliance with all of the following design objectives: a. The proposed development will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of the surrounding properties for uses permitted in this zoning district; b. The proposed development complies with applicable design guidelines adopted by the City; c. The design, scale and intensity of the proposed development supports the established or emerging character of an area; d. In order to form a cohesive, visually interesting and attractive appearance, the proposed development incorporates a substantial number of the following design elements: ❑ Changes in horizontal building planes; ❑ Use of architectural details such as columns, cornices, stringcourses, pilasters, porticos, balconies, railings, awnings, etc.; ❑ Variety in materials, colors and textures; ❑ Distinctive fenestration patterns; ❑ Building stepbacks; and ❑ Distinctive roofs forms. e. The proposed development provides for appropriate buffers, enhanced landscape design and appropriate distances between buildings. I See analysis in Staff Report. Community Development Board — April 20, 2010 FLD2008 -02005 — Page 8 of 11 0 0 COMPLIANCE WITH GENERAL STANDARDS FOR LEVEL TWO APPROVALS: The following table depicts the consistency of the development proposal with the General Standards for Level Two Approvals as per CDC Section 3 -913: Consistent I Inconsistent 1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, X coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage development and use of X' adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons X residing or working in the neighborhood. 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. X 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the X' immediate vicinity. 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including X visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts on adjacent properties. I See analysis in Staff Report. SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION: The Development Review Committee (DRC) reviewed the application and supporting materials at its meetings of March 6, 2008, January 8, 2009 and August 6, 2009, and deemed the development proposal to be legally sufficient to move forward to the Community Development Board (CDB), based upon the following findings of fact and conclusions of law: Findings of Fact. The Planning and Development Department, having reviewed all evidence submitted by the applicant and requirements of the Community Development Code, finds that there is substantial competent evidence to support the following findings of fact: 1. The 0.18 acres located at the southeast corner of North Ft. Harrison Avenue and Marshall Street; 2. The subject property is currently developed with a two -story commercial building (presently vacant) on the eastern portion of the site and an attached dwelling building (duplex — presently vacant) on the western portion of the site; 3. The only existing parking area for this site is north of the two -story commercial building, which requires vehicles to back into Marshall Street; 4. Code Compliance issues were initiated for this site on February 5, 2003, when a Stop Work Order was issued for unpermitted demolition and construction within the two -story commercial building (CDC2003- 00559, which is still an active case); 5. On January 18, 2005, the Community Development Board (CDB) approved Case FLD2004- 02010 with nine conditions of approval for the subject property, permitting retail sales and service uses on both floors of this commercial building and included 11 required parking spaces on the parcel directly south of this site at 1411 N. Ft. Harrison Avenue; 6. Building Permit BCP2005 -06914 was submitted June 25, 2005, to facilitate the remodeling of the building and to construct the site improvements, but this permit was never issued and was voided October 24, 2006; 7. The applicant also lost the 11 required parking spaces on the adjacent parcel due to proposed redevelopment of that parcel (1411 N. Ft. Harrison Avenue); Community Development Board — April 20, 2010 FLD2008 -02005 — Page 9 of 11 • 8. This current application was filed February 4, 2008, in a second attempt to resolve the Code Compliance issue through the approval of an appropriate mix of use for the property; 9. The proposal is to demolish the duplex attached dwelling building on the west side of the site and permit, as a Mixed Use, a retail sales and service use of 1,610 square feet on the first floor and one attached dwelling on the second floor; 10. Many potential uses have been analyzed for this site, with the proposed mixed use the best fit for the site, which is part of the reason for the length of time this application has been in the development review process; 11. The proposal includes setback and perimeter buffer reductions from all property lines; 12. The proposal includes a front (west) setback of 14.6 feet (to pavement), a front (north) setback of 18 feet (to building), eight feet (to sidewalk) and 4.96 feet (to pavement), a side (east) setback of 0.4 feet (to existing building) and 12.93 feet (to pavement) and a side (south) setback of one -foot (to existing building) and zero feet (to pavement); 13. The existing building has a building height of 23.5 feet to the flat roof deck; 14. The proposal includes the construction of a decorative tower at an overall height of 31 feet over the entrance to the retail sales use to give the building visual interest; 15. Based on the proposed uses, 10 parking spaces are required and have been provided on -site; and 16. There is an active Code Compliance issue associated with this subject property for unpermitted remodeling of the two -story commercial building. Conclusions of Law. The Planning and Development Department, having made the above findings of fact, reaches the following conclusions of law: 1. That the development proposal is consistent with the Standards as per Tables 2 -701.1 and 2- 704 of the Community Development Code; 2. That the development proposal is consistent with the Flexibility criteria as per Section 2- 704.0 of the Community Development Code; and 3. That the development proposal is consistent with the General Standards for Level Two Approvals as per Section 3 -913 of the Community Development Code. Based upon the above, the Planning and Development Department recommends APPROVAL of the Flexible Development application to permit a Mixed Use (1,610 square feet of Retail Sales and Services on the first floor and one Attached Dwelling on the second floor) in the Commercial (C) District with a lot area of 7,720 square feet, a lot width of 50.81 feet along N. Ft. Harrison Avenue (west) and 149.95 feet along Marshall Street (north), a front (west) setback of 14.6 feet (to pavement), a front (north) setback of 18 feet (to building), eight feet (to sidewalk) and 4.96 feet (to pavement), a side (east) setback of 0.4 feet (to existing building) and 12.93 feet (to pavement), a side (south) setback of one -foot (to existing building) and zero feet (to pavement), a building height of 31 feet (to top of decorative tower) and 10 parking spaces, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project under the provisions of Community Development Code (CDC) Section 2- 704.C; as well as a north landscape buffer width along Marshall Street of 4.96 feet (to pavement), an east landscape buffer width of 0.4 feet (to existing building), a south landscape buffer width of zero feet (to pavement) and a north foundation landscape width of four feet, as a Comprehensive Landscape Program under the provisions of CDC Section 3- 1202.G, with the following conditions: Community Development Board —April 20, 2010 FLD2008 -02005 —Page 10 of 11 0 0 Conditions of Approval: 1. That application for a building permit to construct the approved project be submitted no later than October 20, 2010. Failure to submit for these permits within this time frame shall cause this Flexible Development approval by the CDB to be null and void and cause compliance action to be initiated; 2. That, prior to the issuance of any permits, a Declaration of Unity of Title be approved and recorded in the public records; 3. That use of the building be for a retail sales and services use on the first floor and one attached dwelling on the second floor; 4. That the final design and color of the building be consistent with the elevations approved by the CDB; 5. That freestanding signage be limited to monument -style signs, be a maximum height of six feet and be consistent with the color and materials of the building; 6. That electric and communication lines on -site be placed underground; 7. That, prior to the issuance of any permits, appropriate agreements with the City and the abutting property owner be approved and recorded, as necessary, to allow tenants of this site to share the dumpster on the property to the east. Additionally, prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy /Completion for this site, the off -site dumpster shall be upgraded to meet City requirements for design and location; 8. That, prior to the issuance of the building permit, the location and visibility of electric equipment (electric panels, boxes and meters) be reviewed and, if located exterior to the building where visible from adjacent roadways or properties, be painted the same color as the building; 9. That, prior to the issuance of a building permit, outside mechanical equipment be reviewed for Code requirements for location and screening; and 10. That, prior to the issuance of any permit, all requirements of the General Engineering, Environmental Engineering, Stormwater Engineering, Traffic Engineering and Fire Departments be addressed. Prepared by Planning and Development Department Staff: WaynA4. Wells, AICP,LPlanner III ATTACHMENTS: ❑ Location Map ❑ Aerial Map ❑ Zoning Map ❑ Existing Surrounding Uses Map ❑ Photographs of Site and Vicinity S: (Planning DepartmentlCD BIFLEX (FLD)IPending caseslUp for the next CDBIMarshall 503 Marshall Building (C) 2010.04 - 4.20. 10 CDB - WWIMarshal1503 Staff Report.docx Community Development Board —April 20, 2010 FLD2008 -02005 — Page 11 of 11 0 s p LEBEAU � Q � w IROQUOIS o O Z PRINCESS U) OSAGE = PLEASANT U MOHAWK a Q j BURST L CT z o d w ST z FAIRMONT Q FAIRMONT a W � 1, Q Q MINNE c-1 �0 = BECKETT MARSHALL 4J BECKETT MARSHALL ST w GRANT PROJECT F- C u Y sr ? o SITE Q CARLTON w ST o ENGMAN E E w Q a-j TANGERIN �J ST w ENGMAN ST C� BI DWELL 2 p LA SALLE ST PALM k BLUFF Q ST J ¢ PALM < PALM BLUFF ST J O � SPRING v.) JURGENS ST Z U� I� w ST CEDAR METTO a METTO ST ��� LOCATION MAP Owner: 1504 Garden, Inc. Case: FLD2008 -02005 Site: 503 Marshall Street Property Size: 0.18 acres PIN: 09/29/15/55530/000 /0100 Atlas Page: 2688 0 0 jp l - r t. s qAA • 7 9 i, » ^� �T r Y i iv 9 "f - • A c, ANIL w AiLJ! *• AERIAL MAP Owner: 150- Garden, Inc. Case: FLD %008 -D2005 Site: 503 Marshall Street Property. }ze: O.1 E.acrrs PIN: 09/29/15/55530/000 /01 CC Atlas Pa-,e: 2683 9 0 1610 1614 1615 1617 - 1613 - 1608 Q� 1612 1613 16 1615 14 :162:5 162 c 2 1611 (v 1610 , 1613 16,'5 `o a IT 1621 Z 2 8 1604 J� Q. 1611 1607 1608 7607 1608 O '05 1606 (O 1611 MINNESOTA DR 1605 1609 ^ 62S 1604 1610 1603 160 1600 1605 1606 160 1 160 2 1604 1600 1609 150 1601 1600 Mq/�Syq�� 1603 604 1 o" 3j 160 1505 y O p q O N 1503 1503 1504 1505 1601 1500 1501 1414 1503 1504 1502 1413 1415 Q 1412 1412 1415 1415 1501 150 149 1496 p m io DR 141 1410 �j 0 1413 1494 1 0 C 1411 1406 1411 1408 Q 1411 1409 1407 140712 A~• 1411 150 1407 1407 0 1403 1407 1406 � 1405 1408 1406 1409 1405 1401 1405 1401 1403 1404 14 06 1403 1308 1402 1401A 1401B O 14 1309 140 1 1402 1403 1310 1309 1400 ,� 1311 MDR 1305 1308 1 1304 1307 Q44' 1309 1307 1308 1305 1301 1302 1306 1307 1304 1305 1306 1 1300 1303 � M 1303 1304 1301 1217 0 p 1216 10 1302 N C1 $ 1215 � 1300 ZONING MAP Owner: 1504 Garden, Inc. Case: FLD2008 -02005 Site: 503 Marshall Street Property Size: 0.18 acres PIN: 09/29/15/55530/000 /0100 Atlas Page: 268B 0 0 1 6 4 / / 161 161 617 0� °i c 9 g 161? 3 z 1161 / 3 1 1614N 1015 _ 1 742 160 167.E _ 1 16181 1 4 U 673 6 5 / 1 g 16 17 18 19 20 .. c c 1 ,� 2 Q 1 q 7 ` 16114 22 23 24 -462.17 — o 2 ? 9 Q� 1 Chid Q _ 16 7 1608 V 16078 6 3 70$14 ' -u les a ail MINNESOTA DR 6W 160�7 _ , (� 16 1604 5 1610 lest I to I 62 s 29 O 1603 16 ° 1600 39 ` �, 26 16 60514 ✓/ 1606 `n - -5 - 057 a I— I ---� 16 5 s- _ 0 ' �6p 25 1so _ I_ 16 12 38 3 _ 31 isp 17 2 16037 D el in S 24 MgRS 1 1so _ _ Re 1` — `ST ��7+E3 160 '150$ 3= o 3 2 9 8 A 11604 yy o 11�17� _ 3_ 0 p 617 0 0 _ 23 79 4 (0 <o '° a 22 15033 1505 p 1601 Ili" 15p1 11111 S 10 y 1504o- �? r- 12438 _ 1S 1- 9 14 2t 1500 03 s 1 1 1413 1415 , 40 a `"� n rn •- M ° ei� —J 15 10 141 8 1 141 S1al `�` X49 IICiI s 4 e li 3 1415 14 11 7 0 ommu 494 2 1410 � 494 71 02 141 I 5 _ 13 1413 6 12 140 192 1411 _a n , CD I I _ 141 5 1A 08- j 3856 1 4 1 11 �7b OQ 14 071/ W 1 10-9 ] 5 eSt�ll �t I z I 1 I I 15 _ � 1 O� h10� 1 / 140 J i o 6 14q� 1407 7 2 1406' _�]� L - X408 1�Qg 1405 Ees >- _ - _ 1 oe I ((,5 )) 7 35 14p1 1405 12 _ _ 6 3 % _ 12 1403 �1 10 1 11 8 1401 - - / 8 1404 Z z° _ _ - 1 - 5 7402- 4 / / 9 13 Ch d 1308 130948 a 1401 A9 j 14 1 II � 14 35 049 1401 y/ 1402 14 a_ _ 399 _ 1310 1795 / C 10 ,� Weil 1 P 1311 1 ., LL14p 13p5 ` _ 40 1 1 ' zo •308 15 o I as 307 - - - - 2 - - 9✓ 33 1 [ ] 41 1304 2 _ _ �/ 1� 09 N 5 1305 3 ` -9 _ 130 2 L — — — 130(7 � 3 5 -{I v - 1308 16 1� _ _ 42 130 1 it _ - 2 18 1304 UiQ l 43 1300 4 = ` 1 09 4 4 - 13 1 0� ° 3� 5 90 3 1304 13 o a`1 _ 01 5 y h _ 27 � 1217 ^ 16 26 — 1 O 68 25 59 1216 ° 7 2 „es 6130 — 1� ' 1 °m Q 1215 67 _ I I n 1300; EXISTING SURROUNDING USES MAP Owner: 1504 Garden, Inc. Case: FLD2008 -02005 Site: 503 Marshall Street Property Size: Atlas Page: 0.18 acres 268B PIN: 09/29/15/55530/000 /0100 ,View looking SW at detached dwellings south of the intersection View looking NE from N. Ft. Harrison Avenue at retail sales use at 1600 N. Myrtle Avenue 0 View looking NW at detached dwelling north of the intersection of Marshall Street and N. Ft. Harrison Avenue View looking NW from Marshall Street at retail sales use at 1600 N. Myrtle Avenue 503 Marshall Street Case Number FLD2008 -02005 Page 2 of 2 View looking S from Marshall Street at subject building on the IA View looking S from Marshall Street at duplex on west side of View looking E from N. Ft. Harrison Avenue at existing duplex on the west side of the subject property View looking SE from Marshall Street looking at the subject building and the commercial property at 1504 N. Garden Avenue View looking S from Marshall Street at the commercial property View looking SE from N. Ft. Harrison Avenue at the property to at. 1504 N. Garden Avenue to the east of the subject property the south of the subject property 503 Marshall Street Case Number FLD2008 -02005 Page 1 of 2 le 1as may, Engineering Condition 0 0 Conditions Associated With FLD2008 -02005 503 MARSHALL ST Steve Doherty 07/22/2009 Prior to review by the Community Development Board: 562 -4773 1. Show on a scaled drawing the location of the dumpster enclosure. (Not met 7/22/09): MET f 8/24/2009 2. Is the property presently connected to the city sanitary sewer system? If the property is presently utilizing a septic tank, Pinellas County Environmental may require that a connection be made to the City's sanitary sewer system (if septic modification permit is required, this permit shall be obtained prior to issuance of City building permit per State laws) NOT MET 8/24/2009 Prior to the issuance of a building permit: 1. Sidewalks and sidewalk ramps adjacent to or a part of the project shall be designed and constructed consistent with City of Clearwater Contract Specifications and Standards Index #109, including the A.D.A. (Truncated domes per D.O.T. Index #304.) Include Index #109 on the construction plans. 2. Water meters are not permitted to be located within driveways, sidewalks or other impervious areas. Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy: 1. Provide a copy of an agreement, recorded in the Official Records of Pinellas County, allowing for shared use of a dumpster enclosure to be constructed on the adjacent property. The agreement shall be binding upon successors in title to both properties and determined to be legally acceptable by the City's Legal Department. (7/22/09, MET) 2. Applicant shall submit 5 sets of as -built drawings that are signed and sealed by a professional registered in the State of Florida. The Construction Services Inspector will field inspect as -built drawings for accuracy. General Note: If the proposed project necessitates infrastructure modifications to satisfy site - specific water capacity and pressure requirements and /or wastewater capacity requirements, the modifications shall be completed by the applicant and at their expense. If underground water mains and hydrants are to be installed, the installation shall be completed and in- service prior to construction in accordance with Fire Department requirements. General Note: DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. Environmental Condition Sarah Josuns 562 -4897 Not Met 02/22/2008 r An Asbestos Survey is required prior to conducting any demolition or renovations. Please contact Not Met the Pinellas County Air Quality Department at (727) 464 -4422 for further information. Parks & Recs Condition Debbie Reid 562 -4818 07/21/2009 A recreation facility impact fee of $200 is due for each new residential unit prior to issuance of building permit or final plat (if applicable) whichever occurs first. Storm Water Condition Phuong Vo 562 -4752 07/16/2009 ti The following shall be addressed prior to Community Development Board. 8/24/2009 Note: CONNECTION TO THE CITY CURB INLET WILL PERMIT RETENTION POND TO BE DESIGNED FOR THE 25 -YEAR EVENT, RATHER THAN THE 50 -YEAR EVENT. THIS Not Met Not Met CaseConditons Print Date: 04/13/2010 Page 1 of 3 "I, 1 0 0 FLD2008 -02005 503 MARSHALL ST Storm Water Condition Phuong Vo 562 -4752 WILL PERMIT A REDUCTION IN REQUIRED POND VOLUME. 1. Pond shall have a maximum side slope of 4:1, not 2:1 as current design shows. Please revise drainage calculations and plan to adhere to this requirement. 8/24/2009 - Not Met 2. Will the pond have an outfall? What is the 15" RCP for? 8/24/2009 - Not Met General note: 1. DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. 2. At building permit application, applicant shall submit all information again for review and file. Solid Waste Condition Tom Glenn 562 -4930 02/26/2008 j' 8/3/09 - TJG Not Met / See comments from 12/18/08 - still applicable. 12/18/08 - TJG If applicant sells this parcel how will solid waste be handled? Best to put enclosure and dumpster at this location now so there is no questions of service at a later date. 2/28/08 - TJG How will solid waste be handled will need dumpster and enclosure for size of project? As agreed in FLD2004- 02010: "That this site share the dumpster on the property to the east, through appropriate agreements with the City and the abutting property owner. This off -site dumpster shall be upgraded with appropriate building permits and be properly located and screened to meet City requirements prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for this site." Traffic Eng Condition Bennett Elbo 562 -4775 07/17/2009 Prior to a Building Permit: Not Met 1. Remove high - visibility crosswalks along driveways. 2. Sight visibility triangles shall be drawn on the property lines. There shall be no objects in the sight triangle which does not meet the City's acceptable vertical height criteria at a level between 30 inches above grade and eight feet above grade. (City's Community Development Code, Section 3 -904). General Note(s): 1) Applicant shall comply with the current Transportation Impact Fee Ordinance and fee schedule and paid prior to a Certificate of Occupancy (C.O.). 2) DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. Zoning Condition Wayne Wells, AICP 727 - 562 -4504 0212812008 2124110 - WW Not Met Placed on Sheet C2/7, but include as a condition of approval in the Staff Report. 2/14/10 & 8/23/09 - WW Despite the response to comment, the requirement must still be met. 7/28/09, 12/22/08 & 2/28/08 - WW Sheet C2/7 - Per Section 3 -911, all on -site overhead utility lines must be placed underground with this proposal. Provide note that such will be done as part of the construction. 02/27/2008 2/24/10, 2/14/10, 8/23/09, 7/28/09, 12/21/08 & 2/27/08 - WW Not Met Since the property is legally described as one lot plus half of the abutting vacated alley, the following will be included as a condition of approval by the CDB: That, prior to the issuance of any permits, a Declaration of Unity of Title be recorded in the public CaseConditons Print Date: 04/13/2010 Page 2 of 3 " . 6 0 0 FLD2008 -02005 503 MARSHALL ST Zoning Condition Wayne Wells, AICP 727 - 562 -4504 records; 07/28/2009 2/24/10 - WW Not Met Include as a condition of approval in the Staff Report. 2/15/10, 8/23/09 & 7/28/09 - WW Unclear if the recorded Access, Egress and Usage Agreement - Waste Dumpster is acceptable to the Solid Waste Department. It was recorded in January 2009. 07/28/2009 2/24/10, 2/15/10, 8/23/09 & 7/28/09 - WW Not Met Potential condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: "That the applicant apply for City building permits for after - the -fact interior renovations, building additions and site improvements by xx, 2010 (three months from CDB date). Failure to submit for these permits within this time frame shall cause this Flexible Development approval by the CDB to be null and void and cause enforcement action to be initiated again;" 07/28/2009 2/24/10, 2/15/10, 8/23/09 & 7/28/09 - WW Not Met Potential condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: "That the final design of the building be consistent with the conceptual elevations submitted, or as modified by the CDB;" 07/28/2009 2/24/10, 2/15/10, 8/23/09 & 7/28/09 - WW Not Met Potential condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: "That the site be limited to one monument sign, at a maximum height of six feet, located outside of visibility triangles, containing the site address and be coordinated /consistent with the color and materials of the building;" Print Date: 04/13/2010 Page 3 of 3 CaseConditons 0 0 4/2/10 Mixed Use Calculation for 503 Marshall Street Property is zoned Commercial District (maximum FAR = 0.55 and maximum density = 24 du /acre) 1. Project area ................ ............................... .......................7,727.96 sf 2. Permitted FAR in Commercial District .............. ...........................0.55 3. Floor area permitted in Commercial District .. ............................... 4,250 sf 4. Floor area proposed ................................ ............................... 1,610 sf 5. Land area available for attached dwellings (#1 minus #4) ..................6,117 sf 6. Land area in an acre ............................. ..............................— 43,560 sf 7. Lot acreage for attached dwellings ( #5 divided by #6) ....................= 0.14 acres 8. Multiply lot acreage (# 7) ........................ ............................... 0.14 acres 9. Maximum density in C District ................ ..............................x 24 du/acre 10. Maximum number of dwelling units permitted ............................ = 3 du 11. Number of dwelling units proposed ........... ............................... l du (OK) 12. Proposed FAR ( #4 divided by #1) ..................... ..........................0.208 13. Proposed density ( #11 divided by #8) ........... ...........................7.14 du/acre • Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Friday, March 12, 2010 5:49 PM To: Doherty, Steve Cc: Vo, Phuong; Watkins, Sherry Subject: FLD2008- 02005, 503 Marshall Street Steve — • Revised plans have been submitted (Sheets C2/7 and C5/7), as well as revised drainage calculations, for the above referenced application revising the drainage pond adjacent to F. Harrison Avenue. I have placed a copy of the revised plans on the cabinets outside Rm. 216. Could you please come by and see if the revisions are acceptable or not? If acceptable, then I will be scheduling this application for the next CDB meeting in April. Please review by Monday, March 22, 2010. Thanks. Wayne M. Wells, AICP Planner III City of Clearwater 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, FL 33756 -5520 Phone: 727 - 562 -4504 Fax: 727 - 562 -4865 0 0 Wells, Wayne From: Doherty, Steve Sent: Wednesday, February 24, 2010 11:06 AM To: Wells, Wayne Cc: Vo, Phuong; Rice, Scott Subject: RE: FLD2008 -02005 - 503 Marshall St My review of the resubmittal leads me to conclude the following: 1. The pond design as described in the stormwater calculations cannot fit into the land lying adjacent to Ft. Harrison Ave. 2. if the pond area was maximized within the land adjacent to Ft. Harrison Ave., with maximum side slope of 4:1, it appears that volume would be insufficient to meet 25 year storm event. 3. Storm structure to which pond is to be connected is not described or shown on the plan. 4. Control structure is not shown on the plan. It is likely a retaining wall would need to be constructed on the parking lot side of the pond in order to meet minimum volume requirement. Until we have a plan showing a feasible solution to this issue the Engineering Dept. cannot support this item going forward to CDB. From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Wednesday, February 24, 2010 7:55 AM To: Doherty, Steve Cc: Vo, Phuong Subject: FLD2008 -02005 - 503 Marshall St Steve — Revised application material has been submitted for the above referenced application. I need to get the CDB agenda to the Clerk's office this morning. Could you please look at this ASAP? I have placed one copy on the cabinets outside Rm 216 for your review. Let me know if okay or not okay. Thanks. Wayne M. Wells, AICP Planner III City of Clearwater 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, FL 33756 -5520 Phone: 727 - 562 -4504 Fax: 727 - 562 -4865 - - - -1 9 0 Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Sunday, February 21, 2010 11:22 AM To: Doherty, Steve Subject: FLD2008 -02005 - 503 Marshall Street Steve — Can you respond Monday am asap? Wayne From: hsullaiman @aol.com [mailto:hsullaiman @ aol.com] Sent: Saturday, February 20, 2010 12:31 PM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: RE: FLD2008 -02005 - 503 Marshall Street Hello On the previous comments you asked to use 25 years instead of 50 now you wants us to change it back to 50 we are confused. Hashim thanks From: Wayne.Wells @myClearwater.com Sent: February 19, 2010 6:38 PM To: pressinc @aol.com; hsullaiman @aol.com Cc: Robert.Tefft @MyClearwater.com; Sherry.Watkins @myClearwater.com Subject: FLD2008 -02005 - 503 Marshall Street Todd & Hashim — The revised application package resubmitted has been reviewed and the following items are still not complied with: Stormwater Engineering 1. Pond slope is not 4:1 on plans as indicated in the response. 2. Connection to a storm inlet is required; pond doesn't have enough volume to handle a 50 -year storm event. Landscaping 1. Comprehensive Landscape Program application submitted. Narrative not submitted. (Prior comment: Provide a narrative with this application, detailing what the landscape requirements are, the reductions requested, the important factors of the landscape design and how this proposed landscape design exceeds the minimum Code requirements in areas of the site where the minimum Code is not being met.) Zoning 1. Affidavit to Authorize Agent is not filled in and is not signed by the property owner, although the notary has attested that Hashim Sullaiman signed the Affidavit. 2. Despite the response to comment, the requirement must still be met. (Prior comment: Sheet C2/7 - Per Section 3 -911, all on -site overhead utility lines must be placed underground with this proposal. Provide note that such will be done as part of the construction.) 3. No reduced 8.5" x 11" colored elevations submitted. Sheet C7/7 - West facade now shows a yellow area along the base rather than tan. Revise to tan on the colored elevations (both the 24 "x36" and the reduced 8.5 "x11 "). 4. Submit paint samples /swatches for the proposed exterior colors. 5. Still need to address "a" and "c" below. Unclear of what the 5.86 dimension at the NW corner of the western parking area is measured to. (Prior comment: Sheet C2/7 - Provide dimensions for the following: a. Since additional wall extensions are being added to the north (two locations - east and west) and the west walls of the building, show such building extensions and the new dimensions from the property lines; c. Dimension from the Marshall Street property line to the sidewalk to the dwelling unit (see other Planning comments);) 6. Still need to address "d ". (Prior comment: Sheet C1/7 - Revise the Site Data for the following: d. Proposed setbacks - This is a corner lot where there are two front setbacks (north and west) and two side setbacks (south and east). Provide Proposed Setbacks for both Front setbacks (north and west) and for both Side setbacks (south and east). Include proposed setbacks to building and to pavement;) 7. Still need to address comment "d" below. (Prior comment: Sheets C4/7 & C7/7 - Sheets are not coordinated as to window, door and tower addition: d. Sheets C4/7 and C7/7 - Ensure the door on the first floor and the window above the door on the second floor are located properly on the west facade consistent with the floor plan. (Sheet C7/7 - Door on first floor on west side not centered - see Sheet C4/7)) 8. Need to attach legal description to application. (Prior comment: Page 1 of the Application - Provide (fill in) the Legal Description (or state "see attached" and attach the legal description to the application) and the Proposed Use.) 9. Still need to address "b" and "c" below. (Prior comment: Response to Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria #1- b. Need to address HOW the proposed uses of retail sales and one residential unit cannot fit onto this site without deviations; c. While this is being processed as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, need to compare the proposal to the retail sales standards for setbacks, building height and parking, especially in light of reductions to the standards (or increase for building height), in detail; and) 10. Unclear if the recorded Access, Egress and Usage Agreement - Waste Dumpster is acceptable to the Solid Waste Department. It was recorded in January 2009. 11. Need to submit 8.5" x 11" copies of Sheets C2/7, C5/7 and C7/7 (colored elevations). Revised application materials addressing the above need to be submitted by 9:00 am on Tuesday, February 23, 2010, to stay on track to the CDB meeting on March 16, 2010. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me. Wayne M. Wells, AICP Planner 111 City of Clearwater 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, FL 33756 -5520 Phone: 727 - 562 -4504 Fax: 727 - 562 -4865 jot Conditions Associated With FLD2008 -02005 503 MARSHALL ST ir 0A Engineering Condition Steve Doherty 07/22/2009 Prior to review by the Community Development Board: 562 -4773 1. Show on a scaled drawing the location of the dumpster enclosure. (Not met 7/22/09). MET 8/24/2009 2. Is the property presently connected to the city sanitary sewer system? If the property is presently utilizing a septic tank, Pinellas County Environmental may require that a connection be made to the City's sanitary sewer system (if septic modification permit is required, this permit shall be obtained prior to issuance of City building permit per State laws) NOT MET 8/24/2009 Prior to the issuance of a building permit: 1. Sidewalks and sidewalk ramps adjacent to or a part of the project shall be designed and constructed consistent with City of Clearwater Contract Specifications and Standards Index #109, including the A.D.A. (Truncated domes per D.O.T. Index #304.) Include Index #109 on the construction plans. 2. Water meters are not permitted to be located within driveways, sidewalks or other impervious areas. Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy: 1. Provide a copy of an agreement, recorded in the Official Records of Pinellas County, allowing for shared use of a dumpster enclosure to be constructed on the adjacent property. The agreement shall be binding upon successors in title to both properties and determined to be legally acceptable by the City's Legal Department. (7/22/09, MET) 2. Applicant shall submit 5 sets of as -built drawings that are signed and sealed by a professional registered in the State of Florida. The Construction Services Inspector will field inspect as -built drawings for accuracy. General Note: If the proposed project necessitates infrastructure modifications to satisfy site - specific water capacity and pressure requirements and /or wastewater capacity requirements, the modifications shall be completed by the applicant and at their expense. If underground water mains and hydrants are to be installed, the installation shall be completed and in- service prior to construction in accordance with Fire Department requirements. General Note: DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. Environmental Condition Sarah Josuns 562 -4897 Not Met 02/22/2008 An Asbestos Survey is required prior to conducting any demolition or renovations. Please contact Not Met the Pinellas County Air Quality Department at (727) 464 -4422 for further information. Parks & Recs Condition Debbie Reid 562 -4818 07/21/2009 A recreation facility impact fee of $200 is due for each new residential unit prior to issuance of building permit or final plat (if applicable) whichever occurs first. Storm Water Condition Phuong Vo 562 -4752 07/16/2009 The following shall be addressed prior to Community Development Board. 8/24/2009 Note: CONNECTION TO THE CITY CURB INLET WILL PERMIT RETENTION POND TO BE DESIGNED FOR THE 25 -YEAR EVENT, RATHER THAN THE 50 -YEAR EVENT. THIS Not Met Not Met CaseConditons Print Date: 02/24/2010 Page 1 of 3 FLD2008 -02005 503 MARSHALL ST Storm Water Condition Phuong Vo 562 -4752 WILL PERMIT A REDUCTION IN REQUIRED POND VOLUME. 1. Pond shall have a maximum side slope of 4:1, not 2:1 as current design shows. Please revise drainage calculations and plan to adhere to this requirement. 8/24/2009 - Not Met 2. Will the pond have an outfall? What is the 15" RCP for? 8/24/2009 - Not Met General note: 1. DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. 2. At building permit application, applicant shall submit all information again for review and file. Solid Waste Condition Tom Glenn 562 -4930 02/26/2008 8/3/09 - TJG Not Met See comments from 12/18/08 - still applicable. 12/18/08 - TJG If applicant sells this parcel how will solid waste be handled? Best to put enclosure and dumpster at this location now so there is no questions of service at a later date. 2/28/08 - TJG How will solid waste be handled will need dumpster and enclosure for size of project? As agreed in FLD2004- 02010: "That this site share the dumpster on the property to the east, through appropriate agreements with the City and the abutting property owner. This off -site dumpster shall be upgraded with appropriate building permits and be properly located and screened to meet City requirements prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for this site." Traffic Eng Condition Bennett Elbo 5624775 07/17/2009 Prior to a Building Permit: Not Met 1. Remove high - visibility crosswalks along driveways. 2. Sight visibility triangles shall be drawn on the property lines. There shall be no objects in the sight triangle which does not meet the City's acceptable vertical height criteria at a level between 30 inches above grade and eight feet above grade. (City's Community Development Code, Section 3 -904). General Note(s): 1) Applicant shall comply with the current Transportation Impact Fee Ordinance and fee schedule and paid prior to a Certificate of Occupancy (C.O.). 2) DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. Zoning Condition Wayne Wells, AICP 727 - 562 -4504 02/28/2008 2/24/10 - WW Not Met Placed on Sheet C2/7, but include as a condition of approval in the Staff Report. 2/14/10 & 8/23/09 - WW Despite the response to comment, the requirement must still be met. 7/28/09,12/22/08 & 2/28/08 - WW Sheet C2/7 - Per Section 3 -911, all on -site overhead utility lines must be placed underground with this proposal. Provide note that such will be done as part of the construction. 02/27/2008 2/24/10, 2/14/10, 8/23/09, 7/28/09, 12/21/08 & 2/27/08 - WW Not Met Since the property is legally described as one lot plus half of the abutting vacated alley, the following will be included as a condition of approval by the CDB: That, prior to the issuance of any permits, a Declaration of Unity of Title be recorded in the public Print Date: 02/24/2010 Page 2 of 3 CaseConditons • FLD2008 -02005 503 MARSHALL ST • Zoning Condition Wayne Wells, AICP 727 - 562 -4504 records; 07/28/2009 2/24/10 - WW Not Met Include as a condition of approval in the Staff Report. 2/15/10, 8/23/09 & 7/28/09 - WW Unclear if the recorded Access, Egress and Usage Agreement - Waste Dumpster is acceptable to the Solid Waste Department. It was recorded in January 2009. 07/28/2009 2/24/10, 2/15/10, 8/23/09 & 7/28/09 - WW Not Met Potential condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: "That the applicant apply for City building permits for after - the -fact interior renovations, building additions and site improvements by xx, 2010 (three months from CDB date). Failure to submit for these permits within this time frame shall cause this Flexible Development approval by the CDB to be null and void and cause enforcement action to be initiated again;" 07/28/2009 2/24/10, 2/15/10, 8/23/09 & 7/28/09 - WW Not Met Potential condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: "That the final design of the building be consistent with the conceptual elevations submitted, or as modified by the CDB;" 07/28/2009 2/24/10, 2/15/10, 8/23/09 & 7/28/09 - WW Not Met Potential condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: "That the site be limited to one monument sign, at a maximum height of six feet, located outside of visibility triangles, containing the site address and be coordinated /consistent with the color and materials of the building;" Print Date: 02/24/2010 Page 3 of 3 CaseConditons 0 9 Wells, Wayne From: Reid, Debbie Sent: Monday, February 22, 2010 10:24 AM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: RE: FLD2008 -02005 - 503 Marshall Street Wayne, P&P fee will need to be paid for the one new residential unit at time of permit /plat. Thanks!! From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Monday, February 15, 2010 11:46 AM To: Albee, Rick; Buzzell, William; Clayton, Gina; Doherty, Steve; Dougall- Sides, Leslie; Glenn, Tom; Gluski, Roberta; Kader, Art; Keller, James; Kurleman, Scott; Morris, William D.; Reid, Debbie; Rice, Scott; Rickard, Leonard; Tefft, Robert; Watkins, Sherry Subject: FLD2008 -02005 - 503 Marshall Street DRC Members — Plans were resubmitted for the above referenced application to be scheduled for the next CDB meeting. This application was last at DRC August 6, 2009. One copy of the resubmittal package has been placed on the cabinets outside Room 216. Please stop by and see if this resubmittal package responses comply with any outstanding comments of yours. Please review by 4 pm on Thursday, February 18, 2010. Please let me know if everything is okay or not, or if a comment needs to be converted to a condition of approval. Thanks. Wayne M. Wells, A/CP Planner III City of Clearwater 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, FL 33756 -5520 Phone: 727 - 562 -4504 Fax: 727- 562 -4865 xN A ear .. Engineering Condition Conditions Associated Witco FLD2008 -02005 503 MARSHALL ST Steve Doherty 07/22/2009 Prior to review by the Community Development Board: 562 -4773 1. Show on a scaled drawing the location of the dumpster enclosure. (Not met 7/22/09). MET 8/24/2009 2. Is the property presently connected to the city sanitary sewer system? If the property is presently utilizing a septic tank, Pinellas County Environmental may require that a connection be made to the City's sanitary sewer system (if septic modification permit is required, this permit shall be obtained prior to issuance of City building permit per State laws) NOT MET 8/24/2009 Prior to the issuance of a building permit: 1. Sidewalks and sidewalk ramps adjacent to or a part of the project shall be designed and constructed consistent with City of Clearwater Contract Specifications and Standards Index #109, including the A.D.A. (Truncated domes per D.O.T. Index #304.) Include Index #109 on the construction plans. 2. Water meters are not permitted to be located within driveways, sidewalks or other impervious areas. Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy: 1. Provide a copy of an agreement, recorded in the Official Records of Pinellas County, allowing for shared use of a dumpster enclosure to be constructed on the adjacent property. The agreement shall be binding upon successors in title to both properties and determined to be legally acceptable by the City's Legal Department. (7/22/09, MET) 2. Applicant shall submit 5 sets of as -built drawings that are signed and sealed by.a. professiona! registered in the State of Florida. The Construction Services Inspector will field inspect as -built drawings for accuracy. General Note: If the proposed project necessitates infrastructure modifications to satisfy site- specific water capacity and pressure requirements and /or wastewater capacity requirements, the modifications shall be completed by the applicant and at their expense. If underground water mains and hydrants are to be installed, the installation shall be completed and in- service prior to construction in accordance with Fire Department requirements. General Note: DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. Not Met Environmental Condition Sarah Josuns 562 -4897 02/22/2008 An Asbestos Survey is required prior to conducting any demolition or renovations. Please contact Not Met the Pinellas County Air Quality Department at (727) 464 -4422 for further information. Landscape Wayne Wells, AICP 727 -562 -4504 07/26/2009 2/15/10 - WW Not Met Application submitted. Narrative not submitted. 8/23/09 - WW Need to submit a revised, completed Comprehensive Landscape Program application with the information requested. 7/26/09 - WW Comprehensive Landscape Program - Provide a narrative with this application, detailing what the landscape requirements are, the reductions requested, the important factors of the landscape design and how this proposed landscape design exceeds the minimum Code requirements in Print Date: 02/19/2010 CaseConditons Page 1 of 5 FLD2008 -02005 503 MARSHALL ST Landscape Wayne Wells, AICP 727 - 562 -4504 areas of the site where the minimum Code is not being met. Parks & Recs Condition Debbie Reid 562 -4818 07/21/2009 A recreation facility impact fee of $200 is due for each new residential unit prior to issuance of building permit or final plat (if applicable) whichever occurs first. Storm Water Condition Phuong Vo 562 -4752 07/16/2009 The following shall be addressed prior to Community Development Board. 8/24/2009 Note: CONNECTION TO THE CITY CURB INLET WILL PERMIT RETENTION POND TO BE DESIGNED FOR THE 25 -YEAR EVENT, RATHER THAN THE 50 -YEAR EVENT. THIS WILL PERMIT A REDUCTION IN REQUIRED POND VOLUME. 1. Pond shall have a maximum side slope of 4:1, not 2:1 as current design shows. Please revise drainage calculations and plan to adhere to this requirement. 8/24/2009 - Not Met 2. Will the pond have an outfall? What is the 15" RCP for? 8/24/2009 - Not Met General note: 1. DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. 2. At building permit application, applicant shall submit all information again for review and file. Solid Waste Condition Tom Glenn 562 -4930 02/26/2008 8/3/09 - TJG See comments from 12/18/08 - still applicable. 12/18/08 - TJG If applicant sells this parcel how will solid waste be handled? Best to put enclosure and dumpster at this location now so there is no questions of service at a later date. 2/28/08 - TJG How will solid waste be handled will need dumpster and enclosure for size of project? As agreed in FLD2004- 02010: "That this site share the dumpster on the property to the east, through appropriate agreements with the City and the abutting property owner. This off -site dumpster shall be upgraded with appropriate building permits and be properly located and screened to meet City requirements prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for this site." Traffic Eng Condition Bennett Elbo 07/17/2009 Prior to a Building Permit: 562 -4775 1. Remove high - visibility crosswalks along driveways. 2. Sight visibility triangles shall be drawn on the property lines. There shall be no objects in the sight triangle which does not meet the City's acceptable vertical height criteria at a level between 30 inches above grade and eight feet above grade. (City's Community Development Code, Section 3 -904). General Note(s): 1) Applicant shall comply with the current Transportation Impact Fee Ordinance and fee schedule and paid prior to a Certificate of Occupancy (C.O.). 2) DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. Zoning Condition Wayne Wells, AICP 727 - 562 -4504 Print Date: 02/19/2010 Page 2 of 5 Not Met Not Met Not Met Not Met CaseConditons FLD2008 -02005 503 MARSHALL ST Zoning Condition Wayne Wells, AICP 727 - 562 -4504 12/17/2008 2/14/10 - WW Not Met Affidavit not filled in and signed, although it has been notarized. 8/23/09 - WW Application form submitted does not include the applicant signature on Page 7 nor the completed Affidavit Page 8. 7/28/09 & 12/17/08 - WW Page 8. of the application, Affidavit to Authorize Agent, has not been submitted (needs to be completed to authorize Todd Pressman as the agent). 02/28/2008 2/14/10 & 8/23/09 - WW Not Met Despite the response to comment, the requirement must still be met. 7/28/09,12/22/08 & 2/28/08 - WW Sheet C2/7 - Per Section 3 -911, all on -site overhead utility lines must be placed underground with this proposal. Provide note that such will be done as part of the construction. 07/26/2009 2/14/10 - WW Not Met Check with Scott Kurleman as to what is proposed and whether adequate. Then revise this comment. 8/23/09 - WW Driveway revised. The expanded landscaping on the east side of the driveway is shown only as turf. With the reductions requested, this expanded area can be landscaped with shrubs and groundcovers in lieu of turf. Revise. 7/26/09 - WW Sheets 2/7 and 5/7 - The eastern driveway is 24 -foot wide. Relocate the eastern edge of pavement from that presently shown at approximately four feet from the eastern property line to line up with the eastern radius of the driveway. Reconfigure sidewalk access to the residential unit doorway to provide the minimum sidewalk necessary (no more than four feet, in width from north side of foundation landscape area) to the parking lot of one parking space. Revise, landscape plan to include landscaping of this larger planting area, recognizing this additional area is within the visibility triangle. Provide a back -up flair of sufficient depth for the space on the north side of the building in accordance with Section 3- 1402.J.1. 02/28/2008 2/14/10 - WW Not Met No reduced 8.5" x 11" elevations submitted. West facade now shows a yellow area along the base rather than tan. Revise to tan. 8/23/09 - WW No colored elevations submitted (either 24 "x36" or reduced 8.5'x11 "). Unclear if revised as requested. 7/28/09, 12/22/08 & 2/28/08 - WW Sheet C7/7 ( "colored" elevations) - To be consistent with the north and east facades, indicate a tan area along the bottom of the west facade south of the tower to the south building line. 02/27/2008 2/14/10, 8/23/09, 7/28/09, 12/21/08 & 2/27/08 - WW Not Met Since the property is legally described as one lot plus half of the abutting vacated alley, the following will be included as a condition of approval by the CDB: That, prior to the issuance of any permits, a Declaration of Unity of Title be recorded in the public records; 07/28/2009 2/14/10, 8/23/09 and 7/28/09 - WW Not Met Submit paint samples /swatches for the proposed exterior colors. 07/28/2009 2/14/10 & 8/23/09 - WW Not Met Still need to address "a" and "c" below. Unclear of what the 5.86 dimension at the NW corner of the western parking area is measured to. 7/28/09 - WW Sheet C2/7 - Provide dimensions for the following: Print Date: 02/19/2010 Page 3 of 5 CaseConditons FLD2008 -02005 503 MARSHALL ST Zoning Condition Wayne Wells, AICP 727 - 562 -4504 a. Since additional wall extensions are being added to the north (two locations - east and west) and the west walls of the building, show such building extensions and the new dimensions from the property lines; b. Dimensions from Marshall Street property line to the edges of all parking lot corners (three locations); c. Dimension from the Marshall Street property line to the sidewalk to the dwelling unit (see other Planning comments); d. Dimension from the east property line to the edge of pavement and to the sidewalk to the dwelling unit; and e. Dimension the width of the foundation landscape area on the north side of the building. 07/28/2009 2/14/10 - WW Not Met Still need to address "d ". 8/23/09 - WW Still need to address "d ", "e" and 'T' below. 7/28/09 - WW Sheet C1/7 - Revise the Site Data for the following: a. Proposed Usage - Revise from "apartments" to "apartment'; b. Proposed Density - Revise from "0" to 7.352 du /acre; c. Proposed Gross Floor Area and FAR - Revise Gross Floor Area from 3.536 sf to 1,768 square feet. Revise FAR from 0.45 to 0:22; d. Proposed setbacks - This is a corner lot where there are two front setbacks (north and west) and two side setbacks (south and east). Provide Proposed Setbacks for both Front setbacks (north and west) and for both Side setbacks (south and east). Include pro_ posed setbacks to building and to pavement; e. Proposed Building Height - Make proposed height dimensions consistent with that depicted on Sheet C4/7; f. Proposed Parking Lot Interior Landscaping None is required to be provided. Unclear why there is a square footage and % of VUA provided (especially in light of no shading on Sheet C2/7 indicating interior landscape area); and g. Parking calculations - Sheet C4/7 indicates the floor area of the first floor retail use, to be 1,768 square feet. Unclear where in the parking calculation the 1,610 square feet used for retail comes from (look at definition for "gross floor area "). Either revise the parking calculation or the square footage on Sheet C4/7 so they match. If 1,768 sf is correct, then nine spaces are required for the retail and insufficient parking is provided for the mixed use (11 required; 10 provided), where a Parking Demand Study would be required to be submitted justifying the reduced parking. 07/28/2009 2/15/10 - WW Not Met See comment "d" below. 8/23/09 & 7/28/09 - WW Sheets C4/7 & C7/7 - Sheets are not coordinated as to window, door and tower addition: a. Sheet C4/7 - Proposed north facade is indicated to "remove existing door and replace with new window add new as per plans'; however, the first floor plan does not show such new window. Also, new window not shown on Sheet C7/7; (2/15/10 - Met) b. Sheet C4/7 - Proposed west facade indicates the new tower addition to be approximately 1/2 of the facade width, but the first and second floor plans indicate the tower addition to be approximately 3/4 of the facade width. Most likely, from a design standpoint and that indicated on the north facade, the tower addition is only about 1/2 of the facade width; (2/15/10 - Met) c. Sheet C4/7 - Proposed second floor plan indicates two windows in the center and a large window on the west side; however, Sheet C7/7 indicates three windows in the center and a small window on the west side. Which is correct ?; and (2/15/10 - Met) d. Sheets C4/7 and C7/7 - Ensure the door on the first floor and the window above the door on the second floor are located properly on the west facade consistent with the floor plan. (Sheet C7/7 - Door on first floor on west side not centered - see Sheet C4/7) Print Date: 02/19/2010 Page 4 of 5 CaseConditons FLD2008 -02005 503 MARSHALL ST Zoning Condition Wayne Wells, AICP 727 - 562 -4504 07/28/2009 2/15/10 - WW Need to attach legal description to application. 8/23/09 & 7/28/09 - WW Page 1 of the Application - Provide (fill in) the Legal Description (or state "see attached" and attach the legal description to the application) and the Proposed Use. 07/28/2009 2/15/10 - WW Still need to address "b" and "c" below. 8/23/09 & 7/28/09 - WW Response to Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria #1 - a. Rewrite first sentence, as it unclear as to its meaning; b. Need to address HOW the proposed uses of retail sales and one residential unit cannot fit onto this site without deviations; c. While this is being processed as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, need to compare the proposal to the retail sales standards for setbacks, building height and parking, especially in light of reductions to the standards (or increase for building height), in detail; and d. Need to be more specific (expound) as to "considering the surrounding community character ". Not Met Not Met 07/28/2009 2/15/10, 8/23/09 & 7/28/09 - WW Not Met Unclear if the recorded Access, Egress and Usage Agreement - Waste Dumpster is acceptable to the Solid Waste Department. It was recorded in January 2009. „ 07/28/2009 2/15/10, 8/23/09 & 7/28/09 -.WW Not Met Potential condition of approval to be.included in the Staff Report: "That the applicant apply for City building permits for after - the -fact interior renovations, building additions and site improvements by xx, 2010. (three months from CDB date). Failure to submit for these permits within this time frame shall cause this Flexible Development approval by the CDB to be null and void and cause enforcement action to be initiated again;" 07/28/2009 2/15/10, 8/23/09 & 7/28/09 - WW Not Met Potential condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: "That the final design of the building be consistent with the conceptual elevations submitted, or as modified by the CDB;" 07/28/2009 2/15/10, 8/23/09 & 7/28/09 - WW Not Met Potential condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: "That the site be limited to one monument sign, at a maximum height of six feet, located outside of visibility triangles, containing the site address and be coordinated /consistent with the color and materials of the building;" 02/15/2010 Need to submit 8.5" x 11" copies of Sheets C2/7, C5/7 and C7/7 (colored elevations). Not Met Print Date: 02/19/2010 Page 5 of 5 CaseConditons • Wells, Wayne 0 From: Doherty, Steve Sent: Thursday, February 18, 2010 4:30 PM To: Wells, Wayne Cc: Rice, Scott; Josuns, Sarah; Vo, Phuong; Elbo, Bennett Subject: RE: FLD2008 -02005 - 503 Marshall Street Two Stormwater Pre CDB conditions have not been met. 1. Pond slope is not 4:1 on plans as indicated in response.. 2. Connection to a storm inlet is required; pond doesn't have enough volume to handle a 50 -year storm event. Otherwise o.k. to go from Gen. Eng., Enviro and Traf. Ops. Standpoint. From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Monday, February 15, 2010 11:46 AM To: Albee, Rick; Buzzell, William; Clayton, Gina; Doherty, Steve; Dougall- Sides, Leslie; Glenn, Tom; Gluski, Roberta; Kader, Art; Keller, James; Kurleman, Scott; Morris, William D.; Reid, Debbie; Rice, Scott; Rickard, Leonard; Tefft, Robert; Watkins, Sherry Subject: FLD2008 -02005 - 503 Marshall Street DRC Members — Plans were resubmitted for the above referenced application to be scheduled for the next CDB meeting. This application,: was last at DRC August 6, 2009. One copy of the resubmittal package has been placed on the cabinets outside Room 216. Please stop by and see if this resubmittal package responses comply with any outstanding comments,of.yours. Please review by 4 pm on Thursday, February 18, 2010. Please let me know if everything is okay or: not,; orJf a comment needs to be converted to a condition of approval. Thanks. Wayne M. Wells, AICP Planner III City of Clearwater 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, FL 33756 -5520 Phone: 727 - 562 -4504 Fax: 727 - 562 -4865 Wells, Wayne From: Albee, Rick Sent: Tuesday, February 16, 2010 2:42 PM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: RE: FLD2008 -02005 - 503 Marshall Street No Issues. From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Monday, February 15, 2010 11:46 AM To: Albee, Rick; Buzzell, William; Clayton, Gina; Doherty, Steve; Dougall- Sides, Leslie; Glenn, Tom; Gluski, Roberta; Kader, Art; Keller, James; Kurleman, Scott; Morris, William D.; Reid, Debbie; Rice, Scott; Rickard, Leonard; Tefft, Robert; Watkins, Sherry Subject: FLD2008 -02005 - 503 Marshall Street DRC Members — Plans were resubmitted for the above referenced application to be scheduled for the next CDB meeting. This application was last at DRC August 6, 2009. One copy of the resubmittal package has been placed on the cabinets outside Room 216. Please stop by and see if this resubmittal package responses comply with any outstanding comments of yours. Please review by 4 pm on Thursday, February 18, 2010. Please let me know if everything is okay or not, or if a comment needs to be converted to a condition of approval::�Thanks,... Wayne M.:Wells, A/CP Planner III City of Clearwater 100 South, Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, FL. 33756 -5520 Phone: 727 - 562 -4504 Fax: 727- 562 -4865 1 I`I 9 Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Monday, February 15, 2010 11:46 AM To: Albee, Rick; Buzzell, William; Clayton, Gina; Doherty, Steve; Dougall- Sides, Leslie; Glenn, Tom; Gluski, Roberta; Kader, Art; Keller, James; Kurleman, Scott; Morris, William D.; Reid, Debbie; Rice, Scott; Rickard, Leonard; Tefft, Robert; Watkins, Sherry Subject: FLD2008 -02005 - 503 Marshall Street DRC Members — Plans were resubmitted for the above referenced application to be scheduled for the next CDB meeting. This application was last at DRC August 6, 2009. One copy of the resubmittal package has been placed on the cabinets outside Room 216. Please stop by and see if this resubmittal package responses comply with any outstanding comments of yours. Please review by 4 pm on Thursday, February 18, 2010. Please let me know if everything is okay or not, or if a comment needs to be converted to a condition of approval. Thanks. Wayne M. Wells, A/CP Planner III City of Clearwater 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, FL 33756 -5520 Phone: 727 - 562 -4504 Fax: 727- 562 -4865 1 • Wells, Wayne • From: Rickard, Leonard Sent: Wednesday, August 19, 2009 11:08 AM To: Watkins, Sherry; Buzzell, William; Chase, Susan; Dougall- Sides, Leslie; DRC Members; Gluski, Roberta; Hollander, Gwen; Hufford, Diane; Josuns, Sarah; Keller, James; Lutz, Deb; Patni, Himanshu; Reid, Debbie; Shell Parsons, Heather; Steve Fairchild; 'US Post Office (E- mail)'; Vo, Phuong; Yellin, Catherine Subject: RE: DRC Resubmittals for the CDB meeting September 15, 2009 Lenny Rickard Assistant Fire Marshal Clearwater Fire and Rescue 610 Franklin St., Clearwater, FL 33756 Office: 727 - 562 -4327 X3078 Cell: 727 - 224 -2091 From: Watkins, Sherry Sent: Friday, August 14, 2009 4:22 PM To: Buzzell, William; Chase, Susan; Dougall- Sides, Leslie; DRC Members; Gluski, Roberta; Hollander, Gwen; Hufford, Diane; Josuns, Sarah; Keller, James; Lutz, Deb; Patni, Himanshu; Reid, Debbie; Rickard, Leonard; Shell Parsons, Heather; Steve Fairchild; US Post Office (E- mail); Vo, Phuong; Yellin, Catherine Subject: DRC Resubmittals for the CDB meeting September 15, 2009 ..; DRC Members, Plans for the following cases have been resubmitted for the September 15, 2009 CDB Meeting: FLD2009 -06020 1575 Sunshine Drive Planner: Scott Kurleman conditions met FLD2009 -07022 26200 US Highway 19 Planner: Wayne Wells conditions met ,;; FLD2008 -02005 503 Marshall Street Planner: Wayne Wells conditions met: FLD2009 -07021 830 Bayway Blvd Planner: Scott Kurleman conditions met I have placed one copy of the case resubmittal package on the cabinets outside of Room 216 in our office for your review (Please do not take it or any of the other copies as they are needed for the CDB members) Please review your comments /conditions for this cases in Permit Plan and determine if they are met. Whether the conditions are "met" or still "not met," please affirm to me via email. Please have these cases reviewed by Wednesday, August 19, 2009 by 2:00 PM. Thank you Sherry Watkins Administrative Analyst Planning Department 562 -4582 Sherry Watkins Administrative Analyst Planning Department 727- 562 -4582 0 Wells, Wayne • From: Doherty, Steve Sent: Tuesday, August 18, 2009 2:34 PM To: Watkins, Sherry; DRC Members; Gluski, Roberta; Josuns, Sarah; Keller, James; Patni, Himanshu; Vo, Phuong Subject: RE: DRC Resubmittals for the CDB meeting September 15, 2009 Sherry, responsive to your request for review of the CDB resubmittals: FLD2009 -06020 1575 Sunshine Drive Planner: Scott Kurleman FLD2009 -07022 26200 US Highway 19 Planner: Wayne Wells FLD2008 -02005 503 Marshall Street CDB Conditions not met FLD2009 -07021 830 Bayway Blvd Planner: Wayne Wells Planner: Scott Kurleman All Engineering pre CDB conditions met All Engineering pre CDB conditions met Gen. Engineering and Stormwater pre All Engineering pre CDB conditions met From: Watkins, Sherry Sent: Friday, August 14, 2009 4:22 PM To: Buzzell, William; Chase, Susan; Dougall- Sides, Leslie; DRC Members; Gluski, Roberta; Hollander;, Gwen; Hufford, Diane; Josuns, Sarah; Keller, James; Lutz, Deb; Patni, Himanshu; Reid, Debbie; Rickard, Leonard, ,Shell. Parsons, Heather; Steve Fairchild; US Post Office (E- mail); Vo, Phuong; Yellin, Catherine Subject: DRC Resubmittals for the CDB'meeting September 15, 2009 y DRC Members, Plans for -the following cases have, been resubmitted -for - the.September 15, 2009 CDB Meeting:. r FLD2009- 06020 1575 Sunshine!Drive Planner: Scott Kurleman , FLD2009 -07022 26200 US Highway 19 Planner: Wayne Wells FLD2008 -02005 503 Marshall Street Planner: Wayne Wells FLD2009 -07021 830 Bayway Blvd Planner: Scott Kurleman I have placed one copy of the case resubmittal package on the cabinets outside of Room 216 in our office for your review (Please do not take it or any of the other copies as they are needed for the CDB members) Please review your comments /conditions for this cases in Permit Plan and determine if they are met. Whether the conditions are "met' or still "not met," please affirm to me via email. Please have these cases reviewed by Wednesday, August 19, 2009 by 2:00 PM. Thank you Sherry Watkins Administrative Analyst Planning Department 562 -4582 Sherry Watkins Administrative Analyst Planning Department 727-562-4582 1 Wells, Wayne From: Watkins, Sherry Sent: Friday, August 14, 2009 4:22 PM To: Buzzell, William; Chase, Susan; Dougall- Sides, Leslie; DRC Members; Gluski, Roberta; Hollander, Gwen; Hufford, Diane; Josuns, Sarah; Keller, James; Lutz, Deb; Patni, Himanshu; Reid, Debbie; Rickard, Leonard; Shell Parsons, Heather; Steve Fairchild; US Post Office (E- mail); Vo, Phuong; Yellin, Catherine Subject: DRC Resubmittals for the CDB meeting September 15, 2009 DRC Members, Plans for the following cases have been resubmitted for the September 15, 2009 CDB Meeting: FLD2009 -06020 1575 Sunshine Drive Planner: Scott Kurleman FLD2009 -07022 26200 US Highway 19 Planner: Wayne Wells FLD2008 -02005 503 Marshall Street FLD2009 -07021 830 Bayway Blvd Planner: Wayne Wells Planner: Scott Kurleman have placed one copy of the case resubmittal package on the cabinets outside of Room 216 in our office for your review (Please do not take it or any of the other copies as they are needed for the CDB members) Please review your comments /conditions for this cases in Permit Plan and determine if they are met. Whether the conditions are "met' or still "not met," please affirm to me via email. Please have these cases reviewed by Wednesday, August 19, 2009 by 2:00 PM. Thank you Sherry Watkins Administrative Analyst Planning Department .562 -4,582 Sherry Watkins Administrative Analyst Planning Department 727 - 552 -4552 1 0 0 Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Monday, August 03, 2009 3:45 PM To: 'PressInc @aol.com' Cc: 'HSullaiman @aol.com' Subject: FLD2008- 02005, 503 Marshall Street fly. •'rt Attached is the draft Development Review Committee (DRC) comments for the above referenced application. This application will be reviewed by the Development Review Committee on Thursday, August 6, 2009, at 1:30 pm in the Planning Department conference room, 100 S. Myrtle Avenue. Wayne M. Wells, AICP Planner III City of Clearwater 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, FL 33756 -5520 Phone: 727 - 562 -4504 Fax: 727 - 562 -4865 Draft 8.6.09 C Action Agend 1 1:30 pm Case Number: FLD2008 -0200-- 503 MARSHALL ST • Owner(s): 1504 Garden Inc b 1504 N Garden Ave Clearwater, Fl 33755 TELEPHONE: No Phone, FAX: No Fax, E -MAIL: No Email OM Representative: Todd Pressman `�� 28870 Us Hwy 19 N Clearwater, F133761 TELEPHONE: 727 - 804 -1760, FAX: 727.669.8114, E -MAIL: pressinc @aol.com Location: 0.177 acres located at the southeast corner of North Ft. Harrison Avenue and Marshall Street Atlas Page: 268B Zoning District: C, Commercial Request: Flexible Development approval to permit a mixed use (retail sales and services on the first floor and an attached dwelling on the second floor) in the Commercial (C) District with a lot area of 7,727.96 square feet, a lot width of 50.81 feet along N. Ft. Harrison Avenue (west) and 149.95 feet along Marshall Street (north), a front (west) setback of xx feet (to pavement), a front (north) setback of 18 feet (to building) and xx feet (to pavement); a side (east) setback of 0.4 feet (to existing building) and xx feet (to pavement), a side (south) setback of one -foot (to existing building) and zero feet (to pavement), a building height of 31 feet (to top of decorative tower) and 10 spaces, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of CDC Section 2- 704.C; and a reduction to the landscape buffer along Marshall Street (north) from 10 to xx feet (to pavement), a reduction to the landscape buffer along the east property line from five to 0.4 feet (to existing building) and a reduction to the landscape buffer along the south property line from five to one -foot (to existing building) and to zero feet (to pavement), as a Comprehensive; Landscape Program, under the provisions of CDC Section 3- 1202.G. Proposed Use: Retail sales and services Neighborhood Clearwater Neighborhoods Coalition Association(s): TELEPHONE: No Phone, FAX: No Fax, E -MAIL: No Email Neighborhood North Greenwood Association, Inc. ; Association(s): TELEPHONE: 560 -4382, FAX: No Fax, E -MAIL: WADENWADE @AOL.COM Neighborhood Bayview Heights Association(s): TELEPHONE: 443 -2550, FAX: No Fax, E -MAIL: No Email Neighborhood Old Clearwater Bay Neighborhood Association(s): TELEPHONE: 461 -0564, FAX: No Fax, E -MAIL: southern @tampabay.rr.com Presenter: Wayne Wells, Planner III Attendees Included: City: 3/6/08: Wayne Wells, Neil Thompson, Scott Rice, Steve Doherty, Jim Keller, Rick Albee; 1/8/09: Wells, Tefft, Rice, Doherty, Keller, Mark Beery; Applicant: 3/6/08: Hashim Sullaiman, Daniel Blignaut; 1/8/09: Todd Pressman, Sullaiman Other: Ron Delp The DRC reviewed this application with the following comments: General Engineering: Development Review Agenda - Thursday, August 6, 2009 - Page 21 DRC Action Agmda 1.1 Prior to review bywommunity Development Board: is 1. Show on a scaled drawing the location of the dumpster enclosure. (Not met 7/22/09). 2. Is the property presently connected to the city sanitary sewer system? If the property is presently utilizing a septic tank, Pinellas County Environmental may require that a connection be made to the City's sanitary sewer system (if septic modification permit is required, this permit shall be obtained prior to issuance of City building permit per State laws) Prior to the issuance of a building permit: 1. Sidewalks and sidewalk ramps adjacent to or a part of the project shall be designed and constructed consistent with City of Clearwater Contract Specifications and Standards Index #109, including the A.D.A. (Truncated domes per D.O.T. Index #304.) Include Index #109 on the construction plans. 2. Water meters are not permitted to be located within driveways, sidewalks or other impervious areas. Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy: 1: Provide a copy of an agreement, recorded in the Official Records of Pinellas County, allowing , for shared use of a dumpster enclosure to be constructed on the adjacent property. The agreement shall be binding upon successors in title to both properties and determined to be legally acceptable by the City's Legal Department. (7/22/09, MET) 2. Applicant shall submit 5 sets of as -built drawings that are signed and sealed by a professional registered in the State of Florida. The Construction Services Inspector will field inspect as -built drawings for accuracy. General Note: If the proposed project necessitates infrastructure modifications to satisfy site- specific water capacity and pressure requirements and/or wastewater capacity requirements, the modifications shall be completed by the applicant and at their expense. If underground water mains and hydrants are to be installed, the installation shall be completed and in- service prior to construction in accordance with Fire Department requirements. General Note: DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; "addrtiorial comments _ ,; i may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. Environmental: 1 , An Asbestos Survey is required prior to conducting any demolition or renovations. Please contact the Pinellas County Air Quality Department at (727) 464 -4422 for further information. Fire: Development Review Agenda - Thursday, August 6, 2009 - Page 22 DRC Action Agmda 1.1 1 , Must meet the re46ments of NFPA 101, 2006 edition Chapter 6 0 6.1.14.4.1 (b) Required Separation of Occupancies (hours) Must provide a 2 hour separation between occupancies. ACKNOWLEDGE PRIOR TO CDB 2. Plan shows one means of egress from the second floor, this sole means of exiting SHALL be a 2 hour rated ACKNOWLEDGE PRIOR TO CDB 3 . Sheet C 4/7 shows that new windows are being added to second floor living area, must meet the requirements ofNFPA 101, 2006 edition Chapter 24 24.2.2.3.3* It shall be an outside window or door operable from the inside without the use of tools, keys, or special effort and shall provide a clear opening of not less than 5.7 ft2 (0.53 m2). The width shall be not less than 20 in. (5 10 mm), and the height shall be not less than 24 in. (6 10 mm). The bottom of the opening shall be not more than 44 in. (1120 mm) above the floor. Such means of escape shall be acceptable where•one of the following criteria is met: (1) The window shall be within 20 ft (6100 mm) of grade. (2) The window shall be directly accessible to fire department rescue apparatus as approved by the authority having jurisdiction. This will be addressed under the building. plans- 4. Plan is unclear of the location of the required fire hydrant, sheet C2/7 . Provide detail showing the location of fire hydrant on the plan, SHALL be on the same side of the street within 300 feet. ACKNOWLEDGE PRIOR TO CDB Harbor Master: 1 . No issues. Legal: 1 , No issues. Land Resources: 1 . No issues. ., Landscaping: 1 . Sheets C2/7 and C5/7 - Must curb, the ea'st'-edge of the parking lot (northeast corner of property) and the north and east edges of the foundation landscape area on the north side of the building. 2 Sheets C2/7 & C5/7 - Relocate the visibility triangle at the street intersection of N._ Ft. Harrison Ave and Marshall Street to be at the property lines (not the roadway pavement edge). 3 . Comprehensive Landscape Program- Provide a narrative with this application, detailing what: the landscape requirements are, the reductions requested, the important factors of the landscape design and how this proposed landscape design exceeds the minimum Code requirements in areas of the site where the minimum Code: is not being met. 4. Sheet C5/7 - Relocate cypress trees to be planted along the top edge of the retention pond, to minimize future maintenance issues due to cypress knees. Parks and Recreation: 1 . A recreation facility impact fee of $200 is due for each new residential unit prior to issuance of building permit or final plat (if applicable) whichever occurs first. Stormwater: 1 . The following shall be addressed prior to Community Development Board. 1. Pond shall have a maximum side slope of 4:1, not 2:1 as current design shows. Please revise drainage calculations and plan to adhere to this requirement. 2. Will the pond have an outfall? What is the 15" RCP for? General note: 1. DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. 2. At building permit application, applicant shall submit all information again for review and file. Solid Waste: Development Review Agenda - Thursday, August 6, 2009 - Page 23 DRC Action Agenda L I 1 . 8/3/09 - TJG • • See comments from 12/18/08 - still applicable. 12/18/08 - TJG If applicant sells this parcel how will solid waste be handled? Best to put enclosure and dumpster at this location now so there is no questions of service at a later date. 2/28/08 - TJG How will solid waste be handled will need dumpster and enclosure for size of project? As agreed in FLD2004- 02010: "That this site share the dumpster on the property to the east, through appropriate agreements with the City and the abutting property owner. This off -site dumpster shall be upgraded with appropriate building permits and be properly located and screened to meet City requirements prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for this site." Traffic Engineering: I . Prior to a Building Permit: 1. Remove high - visibility crosswalks along driveways. 2. Sight visibility triangles shall be drawn on the property lines. There shall be no objects in the sight triangle which does not meet the City's acceptable vertical height criteria at a level between 30 inches above grade _and eight feet above grade. (City's Community Development Code, Section 3 -904). General Note(s): 1) Applicant shall comply with the current Transportation Impact Fee Ordinance and fee schedule and paid prior to a Certificate of Occupancy (C.O.). 2) DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. Planning: re Development Review Agenda - Thursday, August 6, 2009 - Page 24 DRC Action Agmda ]A 1 . 7/28/09 & 12/17/0 'WW • Page 8 of the application, Affidavit to Authorize Agent, has not been submitted (needs to be completed to authorize Todd Pressman as the agent). 2. 7/28/09,12/22/08 & 2/28/08 - WW Sheet C2/7 - Per Section 3 -911, all on -site overhead utility lines must be placed underground with this proposal. Provide note that such will be done as part of the construction. 3 . Sheets 2/7 and 5/7 - The eastern driveway is 24 -foot wide. Relocate the eastern edge of pavement from that presently shown at approximately four feet from the eastern property line to line up with the eastern radius of the driveway. Reconfigure sidewalk access to the residential unit doorway to provide the minimum sidewalk necessary (no more than four feet in width from north side of foundation landscape area) to the parking lot of one parking space. Revise landscape plan to include landscaping of this larger planting area, recognizing this additional area is within the visibility triangle. Provide a back -up flair of sufficient depth for the space on the north side of the building in accordance with Section 3- 1402.J.1. 4. 7/28/09,12/22/08 & 2/28/08 - WW Sheet C7/7 ( "colored" elevations) - To be consistent with the north and east facades, indicate a tan area along the bottom of the west facade south of the tower to the south building line. 5 . 7/28/09 & 12/22/08 - WW Sheet C 1/7 - Update in the bottom left corner the survey information date, since a newer survey has been submitted. 6. 7/28/09,12/21/08 & 2/27/08 - WW Since the property is legally described as one lot plus half of the abutting vacated alley, the following will be included as a condition of approval by the CDB: That, prior to the issuance of any permits, a Declaration of Unity of Title be recorded in the public records; . 7. 7/28/09 & 12/22/08 -'WW Response to Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria #5 - It has been indicated as a response "a, b, e ". Provide a response that details HOW this proposal is in compliance with these objectives. 8. 7/27/09 - WW Revise Parcel Number to 09- 29 -15- 55530- 000 -0100. 12/17/09 - WW Page 1 of the application has an incorrectparcel number. Revise. 9. Response to Comprehensive Infill'Redevelopment Project criteria #2 - a. Need to address'HOW the proposal meets the criteria; b. Second sentence - Revise "substantial" to "substantial "; and c. Unclear of the nature of this "successful" developer, and what this has to do with the application (experience indicated on this plan is not one of "success "). Development Review Agenda - Thursday, August 6, 2009 - Page 25 DRC Action Agmda I.1 10 11 12 . 13 . 14 15 16 7/27/09 - WW 0 9 Application form states "see attached" for the "Description of Request ", but no request is attached to the application form. In addition to the height increase indicated below under the 12/22/08 & 2/27/08 comment, need to provide an overall description of the request. Following is what I have prepared for potential usage for attachment to the application (may still need to be revised to the specifics of the proposal): "Flexible Development approval to permit a mixed use (retail sales and services on the first floor and an attached dwelling on the second floor) in the Commercial (C) District with a lot area of 7,720 square feet, a lot width of 50.81 feet along N. Ft. Harrison Avenue (west) and 149.95 feet along Marshall Street (north), a front (west) setback of xx feet (to pavement), a front (north) setback of 18 feet (to building) and 4.96 feet (to pavement), a side (east) setback of 0.4 feet (to existing building) and xx feet (to pavement), a side (south) setback of 1.3 feet (to existing building) and zero feet (to pavement), a building height of 31 feet (to top of decorative tower) and 10 spaces, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2- 704.C; and a reduction to the landscape buffer along Marshall Street (north) from 10 to 4.96 feet (to pavement), a reduction to the landscape buffer along the east property line from five to 0.4 feet (to existing building) and a reduction to the landscape buffer along the south property line from five to 1.3 feet (to existing building) and to zero feet (to pavement), as a Comprehensive Landscape Program, under the provisions of Section 371202.G." 12/22/08 & 2/27/08 - WW Request needs to include a building height increase for a decorative tower from 25 feet to xx feet (see other comments about providing the height of the tower from existing grade to top of tower). Request also needs to provide a justification for such increase. Response to General Applicability criteria #4 - Response needs to address HOW the project minimizes traffic congestion. Suggestion is to address the removal of the existing back -out parking and the improvements to handicap accessibility and pedestrian safety by the removal of such back -out parking. Response to General Applicability criteria #1 - a. Unclear of the nature of this "successful" developer, and what this has to do with the application (experience indicated on this plan is not one of "success "); and b. Unclear what "C- stores" is. Sheet C4/7 -Revise for the following: . a. Provide a height dimension from existing grade to top of flat roof (assumed not to be 23' -6, ";, assumed this, dimension`is to the top of that portion of the parapet); b. Provide a height dimension from the top of the flat roof to the top of the parapets (see above)'-" and c. Ensure the correct height to top of flat roof and to the top of the decorative tower are reflected, in the Site Data Table on Sheet C1 /7 and in the written material. 7/28/09 & 12/22/09 - WW Sheets C2/7 & C5/7 - Need to properly show any proposed freestanding/monument signage, which should be coordinated with proposed landscaping. Required sign setback is five feet from any property line. Revise. Submit paint samples /swatches for the proposed exterior colors. Sheet C2/7 - Provide dimensions for the following: a. Since additional wall extensions are being added to the north (two locations - east and west) and the west walls of the building, show such building extensions and the new dimensions from the property lines; b. Dimensions from Marshall Street property line to the edges of all parking lot corners (three locations); c. Dimension from the Marshall Street property line to the sidewalk to the dwelling unit (see other Planning comments); d. Dimension from the east property line to the edge of pavement and to the sidewalk to the dwelling unit; and e. Dimension the width of the foundation landscape area on the north side of the building. Development Review Agenda - Thursday, August 6, 2009 - Page 26 DRC Action Agmda I.I 17 . Sheet C1 /7 - Revis& Site Data for the following: • a. Proposed Usage - Revise from "apartments" to "apartment "; b. Proposed Density - Revise from "0" to 7.352 du/acre; c. Proposed Gross Floor Area and FAR - Revise Gross Floor Area from 3.536 sf to 1,768 square feet. Revise FAR from 0.45 to 0.22; d. Proposed setbacks - This is a corner lot where there are two front setbacks (north and west) and two side setbacks (south and east). Provide Proposed Setbacks for both Front setbacks (north and west) and for both Side setbacks (south and east). Include proposed setbacks to building and to pavement; e. Proposed Building Height - Make proposed height dimensions consistent with that depicted on Sheet C4/7; f. Proposed Parking Lot Interior Landscaping - None is required to be provided. Unclear why there is a square footage and % of VUA provided (especially in light of no shading on Sheet C2/7 indicating interior landscape area); and g. Parking calculations - Sheet C4/7 indicates the floor area of the first floor retail use to be 1,768 square feet. Unclear where in the parking calculation the 1,610 square feet used for retail comes from (look at definition for "gross floor area "). Either revise the parking calculation or the square footage on Sheet C4/7 so they match. If 1,768 sf is correct, then nine spaces are required for the retail and insufficient parking is provided for the mixed use (11 required; 10 provided), where a Parking Demand Study would be required to be submitted justifying the reduced parking. .18. Sheets C4/7 & C7/7 - Sheets are not coordinated as to window, door and tower addition: a. Sheet C4/7 - Proposed north facade is indicated to "remove existing door and replace with new window add new as per plans "; however, the first floor plan does not show such new window. Also, new window not shown on Sheet C7/7; b. Sheet C4/7 - Proposed west facade indicates the new tower addition to be approximately 1/2 of the facade width, but the first and second floor plans indicate the tower addition to be approximately 3/4 of the facade width. Most likely, from a design standpoint and that indicated on the north, facade, the tower addition is only about 1/2 of the facade width; . :,•., c. Sheet C4/7 - Proposed second floor plan indicates two windows in the center and a large Window on the west side; however, Sheet C7/7 indicates three windows in the center- and a, small window on the. westi side.. Which is correct ?; and „ d. Sheets .C4/7- and C7/7 - Ensure the .door on the first floor and the window above, the door on, the second floor are located properly ,on the west facade consistent with the floor. plan: . 19:.: Page l: of the Application-- Provide (fill`in) the Legal Description (or state . "see attached" and if attach the legal description to the application) and the Proposed Use. 20. Project Name on Application (Marshall Building) is not consistent with that indicated in the title blocks on the plans (Garden Avenue Complex). Decide on a Project Name and place on the application and in the title block on the plans. 21 . Response to General Applicability criteria #2 - a. Unclear of the nature of this "successful" developer, and what this has to do with the application (experience indicated on this plan is not one of "success "); b. Unclear HOW the proposed improvements will cause significant improvements in the vicinity and HOW this proposal will be a leader of investment, since there has been more recent investment in the property to the south. 22. 7/28/09 & 12/22/08 - WW Response to General Applicability criteria #3 - Provide a response to the criteria as to HOW this proposal will not have 'any adverse effects. Talk about the positive improvements relating to health and safety. 23 . 7/28/09 & 12/22/08 - WW Response to General Applicability criteria #5 - Revise in the last sentence "loeader" to "leader ". 24. Response to General Applicability criteria #6 - Response could address the improvement to the visual aspect of this property with the proposal, with the elimination of the duplex on the corner, along with the proposed building, parking and landscaping improvements. Address hours of operation impacts. Address how residential unit on the second floor conforms with this criteria. Second sentence does not fit with this criteria (remove or revise). Development Review Agenda - Thursday, August 6, 2009 - Page 27 DRC Action Agmda ] A • 25 . Response to CompOnsive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria #0 a. Rewrite first sentence, as it unclear as to its meaning; b. Need to address HOW the proposed uses of retail sales and one residential unit cannot fit onto this site without deviations; c. While this is being processed as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, need to compare the proposal to the retail sales standards for setbacks, building height and parking, especially in light of reductions to the standards (or increase for building height), in detail; and d. Need to be more specific (expound) as to "considering the surrounding community character ". 26. Page 1 of the application - Enter the Property Owner's name on the appropriate line. If the agent is the same as the Property Owner, then list such along with the appropriate mailing address, phone number(s) and email. This information is not the same as the Agent information. Revise. 27. 7/28/09 & 12/22/08 - WW Response to Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria #6 - It has been indicated as a response "a, b, c ". Provide a response that details HOW this proposal is in compliance with these objectives. 28 . Unclear if the recorded Access, Egress and Usage Agreement - Waste Duinpster is acceptable to the Solid Waste Department. It was recorded in January 2009. 29. Potential condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: "That the applicant apply for City building permits for after- the -fact interior renovations, building additions and site improvements by xx, 2009 (three months from CDB date). Failure to submit for these permits within this time frame shall cause this Flexible Development approval by the CDB to be null and void and cause enforcement action to be initiated again;" 30. Potential condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: "That.the final design of the building be consistent with the conceptual elevations submitted, or as modified by the CDB;" 31 . Potential condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: ".That the site be limited to one monument sign, at a maximum height of six feet, located outside ��,of visibility triangles, containing the site address and be coordinated/consistent with -the color.and materials of the building;•" Other: r. No >Comments ..... Notes: Suffcient _ To'be pfaced'on the 9/15/09 CDB agenda, submit 15 collated copies of the fevised plans &- applicat on;material: ,• addressing all above departments' comments by'noori, 8/14/09. Packets shall be collated; ,folded'and, stapled as; appropriate. ,, ., Development Review Agenda - Thursday, August 6, 2009 - Page 28 DRC Action Agmda 1.1 ' r 1.30 pm Case Number: FLD2008 -020-- 503 MARSHALL ST •. Owner(s): 1504 Garden Inc . 1 � 1 1504 N Garden Ave Clearwater, F133755 Do hok TELEPHONE: No Phone, FAX: No Fax, E -MAIL: No Email Representative: Todd Pressman 28870 Us Hwy 19 N Clearwater, FI 33761 TELEPHONE: 727 - 804 -1760, FAX: 727.669.8114, E -MAIL: pressinc @aol.com Location: 0.177 acres located at the southeast corner of North Ft. Harrison Avenue and Marshall Street Atlas Page: 268B Zoning District: C, Commercial Request: Flexible Development approval to permit a mixed use (retail sales and services on the first floor and an attached dwelling on the second floor) in the Commercial (C) District with a lot area of 7,727.96 square feet, a lot width of 50.81 feet along N. Ft. Harrison Avenue (west) and 149.95 feet along Marshall Street (north), a front (west) setback of xx feet (to pavement), a front (north) setback of 18 feet (to building) and xx feet (to pavement), a side (east) setback of 0.4 feet (to existing building) and xx feet (to pavement), a side (south) setback of one -foot (to existing building) and zero feet (to pavement), a building height of 31 feet (to top of decorative tower) and 10 spaces, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2- 704.C; and a reduction to the landscape buffer along Marshall Street (north) from 10 to xx feet (to pavement), a reduction to the landscape buffer along the east property line from five to 0.4 feet (to existing building) and a reduction to the landscape buffer along the south property line from five to one -foot (to existing building) and to zero feet (to pavement), as a Comprehensive Landscape Program, under the provisions of Section 3- 1202.G. Proposed Use: Retail sales and services Neighborhood Clearwater Neighborhoods Coalition Association(s): TELEPHONE: No Phone, FAX: No Fax, E -MAIL: No Email Neighborhood North Greenwood Association, Inc. ; Association(s): TELEPHONE: 560 -4382, FAX: No Fax, E -MAIL: WADENWADE @AOL.COM Neighborhood Bayview Heights Association(s): TELEPHONE: 443 -2550, FAX: No Fax, E -MAIL: No Email Neighborhood Old Clearwater Bay Neighborhood Association(s): TELEPHONE: 461 -0564, FAX: No Fax, E -MAIL: southern @tampabay.rr.com Presenter: Wayne Wells, Planner III Attendees Included: City: 3/6/08: Wayne Wells, Neil Thompson, Scott Rice, Steve Doherty, Jim Keller, Rick Albee; 1/8/09: Wells, Tefft, Rice, Doherty, Keller, Mark Beery; Applicant: 3/6/08: Hashim Sullaiman, Daniel Blignaut; 1/8/09: Todd Pressman, Sullaiman Other: Ron Delp The DRC reviewed this application with the following comments: General Engineering: Development Review Agenda - Thursday, August 6, 2009 - Page 21 DRC Action Agmda I.1 Prior to review byaommunity Development Board: 0 1. Show on a scaled drawing the location of the dumpster enclosure. (Not met 7/22/09). 2. Is the property presently connected to the city sanitary sewer system? If the property is presently utilizing a septic tank, Pinellas County Environmental may require that a connection be made to the City's sanitary sewer system (if septic modification permit is required, this permit shall be obtained prior to issuance of City building permit per State laws) Prior to the issuance of a building permit: 1. Sidewalks and sidewalk ramps adjacent to or a part of the project shall be designed and constructed consistent with City of Clearwater Contract Specifications and Standards Index #109, including the A.D.A. (Truncated domes per D.O.T. Index #304.) Include Index #109 on the construction plans. 2. Water meters are not permitted to be located within driveways, sidewalks or other impervious areas. Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy: 1. Provide a copy of an agreement, recorded in the Official Records of Pinellas County,. allowing for shared use of a dumpster enclosure to be constructed on the adjacent property. The agreement shall be binding upon successors in title to both properties and determined to be legally acceptable by the City's Legal Department. (7/22/09, MET) 2. Applicant shall submit 5 sets of as -built drawings that are signed and sealed by a professional registered in the State of Florida. The Construction Services Inspector will field inspect as -built drawings for accuracy. General Note: If the proposed project necessitates infrastructure modifications to satisfy site - specific water capacity and pressure requirements and/or wastewater; capacity requirements, the modifications shall be completed by the applicant and at their expense. If underground water mains and hydrants are to be installed, the installation shall be completed and in- service prior to construction in accordance with Fire Department requirements. General Note: DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review;; additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. Environmental: I . An Asbestos Survey is required prior to conducting any demolition or renovations. Please contact the Pinellas County Air Quality Department at (727) 464 -4422 for further information. Fire: Development Review Agenda - Thursday, August 6, 2009 - Page 22 DRC Aai- Ag.dx I. 1 1 , Must meet the relaments of NFPA 101, 2006 edition Chapter 60 6.1.14.4.1 (b) Required Separation of Occupancies (hours) Must provide a 2 hour separation between occupancies. ACKNOWLEDGE PRIOR TO CDB 2 . Plan shows one means of egress from the second floor, this sole means of exiting SHALL be a 2 hour rated ACKNOWLEDGE PRIOR TO CDB 3 , Sheet C 4/7 shows that new windows are being added to second floor living area, must meet the requirements ofNFPA 101, 2006 edition Chapter 24 24.2.2.3.3* It shall be an outside window or door operable from the inside without the use of tools, keys, or special effort and shall provide a clear opening of not less than 5.7 ft2 (0.53 m2). The width shall be not less than 20 in. (5 10 mm), and the height shall be not less than 24 in. (6 10 mm). The bottom of the opening shall be not more than 44 in. (1120 mm) above the floor. Such means of escape shall be acceptable where one of the following criteria is met: (1) The window shall be within 20 ft (6 100 nun) of grade. (2) The window shall be directly accessible to fire department rescue apparatus as approved by the authority having jurisdiction. This will be addressed under the building plans 4. Plan is unclear of the location of the required fire hydrant, sheet C2/7 . Provide detail showing the location of fire hydrant on the plan, SHALL be on the same side of the street within 300 feet. ACKNOWLEDGE PRIOR TO CDB Harbor Master: 1 . No issues. Legal: I . No issues. Land Resources: 1 No issues. Landscaping: 1 . Sheets C2/7 and C5/7 - Must curb the east edge of the parking lot (northeast cornet of property) and the north and east edges of the foundation landscape area on the north side of the building. ' 2 Sheets C2/7 & C5/7 - Relocate the visibility triangle`at the street intersection of N. Ft. Harrison Ave and Marshall Street to be at the ,property lines (not the roadway pavement edge). 3. Comprehensive Landscape Program - Provide a narrative with this application, detailing what the landscape requirements are, the reductions requested, the important factors of the landscape design and how this proposed landscape design exceeds the minimum Code requirements in areas of the site where the minimum Code is not being met. 4. Sheet C5/7 - Relocate cypress trees to be planted along the top edge of the retention pond, to minimize future maintenance issues due to cypress knees. Parks and Recreation: 1 . A recreation facility impact fee of $200 is due for each new residential unit prior to issuance of building permit or final plat (if applicable) whichever occurs first. Stormwater: 1 . The following shall be addressed prior to Community Development Board. 1. Pond shall have a maximum side slope of 4:1, not 2:1 as current design shows. Please revise drainage calculations and plan to adhere to this requirement. 2. Will the pond have an outfall? What is the 15" RCP for? General note: 1. DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. 2. At building permit application, applicant shall submit all information again for review and file. Solid Waste: Development Review Agenda - Thursday, August 6, 2009 - Page 23 DRC Action Agcnda 1.1 ' 1 . 8/3/09 - TJG • • See comments from 12/18/08 - still applicable. 12/18/08 - TJG If applicant sells this parcel how will solid waste be handled? Best to put enclosure and dumpster at this location now so there is no questions of service at a later date. 2/28/08 - TJG How will solid waste be handled will need dumpster and enclosure for size of project? As agreed in FLD2004- 02010: "That this site share the dumpster on the property to the east, through appropriate agreements with the City and the abutting property owner. This off -site dumpster shall be upgraded with appropriate building permits and be properly located and screened to meet City requirements prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for this site." Traffic Engineering: I . Prior to a Building Permit: 1. Remove high- visibility crosswalks along driveways. 2. Sight visibility triangles shall be drawn on the property lines. There shall be no objects in the sight triangle which does not meet the City's acceptable vertical height criteria at a level between 30 inches above grade and eight feet above grade. (City's Community Development Code, Section 3 -904). General Note(s): 1) Applicant shall comply with the current Transportation Impact Fee Ordinance and fee schedule and paid prior to a Certificate of Occupancy (C.O.). 2) DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. Planning: Development Review Agenda - Thursday, August 6, 2009 - Page 24 DRC Action Agenda I.I 1 . 7/28/09 & 12/17/04&W • Page 8 of the application, Affidavit to Authorize Agent, has not been submitted (needs to be completed to authorize Todd Pressman as the agent). 2. 7/28/09,12/22/08 & 2/28/08 - WW Sheet C2/7 - Per Section 3 -911, all on -site overhead utility lines must be placed underground with this proposal. Provide note that such will be done as part of the construction. 3 . Sheets 2/7 and 5/7 - The eastern driveway is 24 -foot wide. Relocate the eastern edge of pavement from that presently shown at approximately four feet from the eastern property line to line up with the eastern radius of the driveway. Reconfigure sidewalk access to the residential unit doorway to provide the minimum sidewalk necessary (no more than four feet in width from north side of foundation landscape area) to the parking lot of one parking space. Revise landscape plan to include landscaping of this larger planting area, recognizing this additional area is within the visibility triangle. Provide a back -up flair of sufficient depth for the space on the north side of the building in accordance with Section 3- 1402.J.1. 4. 7/28/09, 12/22/08 & 2/28/08 - WW Sheet C7/7 ( "colored" elevations) - To be consistent with the north and east facades, indicate a tan area along the bottom of the west facade south of the tower to the south building line. 5 . 7/28/09 & 12/22/08 - WW Sheet C1 /7 - Update in the bottom left corner the survey information date, since a newer survey has been submitted. 6. .7/28/09,12/21/08 & 2/27/08 - WW Since the property is legally described as one lot plus half of the abutting vacated alley, the following will be included as a condition of approval by the CDB: That, prior to the issuance of any permits, a Declaration of Unity of Title be recorded in the public records; 7. 7/28/09 & 12/22/08 - WW Response to Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria #5 - It has been indicated as a response "a, b, e ". Provide a response that details HOW this proposal is in compliance with these objectives. 8. 7/27/09 - WW Revise Parcel Number to 09- 29 -15- 55530- 000 -0100. 12/17/09 - WW Page l of the application has an incori&t'parcel number. Revise. 9. Response to Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria #2 - (` a. Need to address HOW the proposal meets the criteria; b. Second sentence - Revise "substantial" to "substantial "; and c. Unclear of the nature of this "successful" developer, and what this has to do with the application (experience indicated on this plan is not one of "success "). Development Review Agenda - Thursday, August 6, 2009 - Page 25 DRC Action Agmda 1.1 10 . 7/27/09 - WW 0 0 Application form states "see attached" for the "Description of Request ", but no request is attached to the application form. In addition to the height increase indicated below under the 12/22/08 & 2/27/08 comment, need to provide an overall description of the request. Following is what I have prepared for potential usage for attachment to the application (may still need to be revised to the specifics of the proposal): "Flexible Development approval to permit a mixed use (retail sales and services on the first floor and an attached dwelling on the second floor) in the Commercial (C) District with a lot area of 7,720 square feet, a lot width of 50.81 feet along N. Ft. Harrison Avenue (west) and 149.95 feet along Marshall Street (north), a front (west) setback of xx feet (to pavement), a front (north) setback of 18 feet (to building) and 4.96 feet (to pavement), a side (east) setback of 0.4 feet (to existing building) and xx feet (to pavement), a side (south) setback of 1.3 feet (to existing building) and zero feet (to pavement), a building height of 31 feet (to top of decorative tower) and 10 spaces, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2- 704.C; and a reduction to the landscape buffer along Marshall Street (north) from 10 to 4.96 feet (to pavement), a reduction to the landscape buffer along the east property line from five to 0.4 feet (to existing building) and a reduction to the landscape buffer along the south property line from five to 1.3 feet (to existing building) and to zero feet (to pavement), as a Comprehensive Landscape Program, under the provisions of Section 3- 1202.G." 12/22/08 & 2/27/08 - WW Request needs to include a building height increase for a decorative tower from 25 feet to xx feet (see other comments about providing the height of the tower from existing grade to top of tower). Request also needs to provide a justification for such increase. 11 . Response to General Applicability criteria #4 - Response needs to address HOW the project minimizes traffic congestion. Suggestion is to address the removal of the existing back -out parking and the improvements to handicap accessibility and pedestrian safety by the removal of such back -out parking. 12 Response to General Applicability criteria #1 - a. Unclear of the nature of this "successful" developer, and what this has to do with the application (experience indicated on this plan is not one of "success "); and "b. Unclear what "C- stores" is. 13 Sheet C4/7 - Revise -for the following: a, Provide a height dimension from existing grade to top of flat roof (assumed not to be 23'-6!'- assumed this dimension is-to. the top of.that portion of the parapet); b. Provide. a• height'dimension: from the top of the flat roof to the top of the parapets (see % : , 4 above); and c. Ensure the correct height to top of flat roof and to the top of the decorative tower are reflected in the Site Data Table on Sheet C1 /7 and in the written material. 14. 7/28/09 & 12/22/09 - WW Sheets C2/7 & C5/7 - Need to properly show any proposed freestanding /monument signage, which should be coordinated with proposed landscaping. Required sign setback is five feet from any property line. Revise. 15. Submit paint samples /swatches for the proposed exterior colors. 16. Sheet C2/7 - Provide dimensions for the following: a. Since additional wall extensions are being added to the north (two locations - east and west) and the west walls of the building, show such building extensions and the new dimensions from the property lines; b. Dimensions from Marshall Street property line to the edges of all parking lot corners (three locations); c. Dimension from the Marshall Street property line to the sidewalk to the dwelling unit (see other Planning comments); d. Dimension from the east property line to the edge of pavement and to the sidewalk to the dwelling unit; and e. Dimension the width of the foundation landscape area on the north side of the building. Development Review Agenda - Thursday, August 6, 2009 - Page 26 DRC Aaion Ag.da I. 1 17 18 lg: 20 21 Sheet C1 /7 - Revi* Site Data for the following: a. Proposed Usage - Revise from "apartments" to "apartment "; b. Proposed Density - Revise from "0" to "7352 du/acre; c. Proposed Gross Floor Area and FAR - Revise Gross Floor Area from 3.536 sf to 1,768 square feet. Revise FAR from 0.45 to 0.22; d. Proposed setbacks - This is a corner lot where there are two front setbacks (north and west) and two side setbacks (south and east). Provide Proposed Setbacks for both Front setbacks (north and west) and for both Side setbacks (south and east). Include proposed setbacks to building and to pavement; e. Proposed Building Height - Make proposed height dimensions consistent with that depicted on Sheet C4/7; f. Proposed Parking Lot Interior Landscaping - None is required to be provided. Unclear why there is a square footage and % of VUA provided (especially in light-of no shading on Sheet C2/7 indicating interior landscape area); and g. Parking calculations - Sheet C4/7 indicates the floor area of the first floor retail use to be 1,768 square feet. Unclear where in the parking calculation the 1,610 square feet used for retail comes from (look at definition for "gross floor area "). Either revise the parking calculation or the square footage on Sheet C4/7 so they match. If 1,768 sf is correct, then nine spaces are required for the retail and insufficient parking is provided for the mixed use (11 required; 10 provided),. where a Parking Demand Study would be required to be submitted justifying the reduced parking. Sheets C4/7 & C7/7 - Sheets are not coordinated as to window, door and tower addition: a. Sheet C4/7 - Proposed north facade is indicated to "remove existing door and replace with new window add new as per plans "; however, the first floor plan does not show such new window. Also, new window not shown on Sheet C7/7; b. Sheet C4/7 - Proposed west facade indicates the new tower addition to be approximately 1/2 of, the facade width, but the first and second floor plans indicate the tower addition to be I . approximately 3/4 of the facade width. Most likely, from a design standpoint and that indicated on the north facade, the tower addition is only about 1/2 of the facade width; .c,: Sheet C4/7 - Proposed second floor plan indicates two windows in the center and a large i ,- window on the west side; however, Sheet C7/7 indicates three windows in the center and a small.. window on the west side. Which is correct ?; and d. Sheets C4 /7.and C7/7. - Ensure the door on the first floor and the window above the door. on: -,. ,, .the second floor are :located properly on the west facade consistent with the _floor plan: ;Page'l of the Application- Provide (fill in) the Legal Description (or state "see, attached" and attach the legal description to the application) and the Proposed Use. Project Name on Application (Marshall Building) is not consistent with that indicated in the title blocks on the plans (Garden Avenue Complex). Decide on a Project Name and place on the application and in the title block on the plans. Response to General Applicability criteria #2 - a. Unclear of the nature of this "successful" developer, and what this has to do with the application (experience indicated on this plan is not one of "success "); b. Unclear HOW the proposed improvements will cause significant improvements in the vicinity and HOW this proposal will be a leader of investment, since there has been more recent investment in the property to the south. 7/28/09 & 12/22/08 - WW Response to General Applicability criteria #3 - Provide a response to the criteria as to HOW this proposal will not have any adverse effects. Talk about the positive improvements relating to health and safety. 7/28/09 & 12/22/08 - WW Response to General Applicability criteria #5 - Revise in the last sentence "loeader" to "leader ". Response to General Applicability criteria #6 - Response could address the improvement to the visual aspect of this property with the proposal, with the elimination of the duplex on the comer, along with the proposed building, parking and landscaping improvements. Address hours of operation impacts. Address how residential unit on the second floor conforms with this criteria. Second sentence does not fit with this criteria (remove or revise). Development Review Agenda - Thursday, August 6, 2009 - Page 27 DRC Action Agenda I.I ` 25 . Response to Comnsive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria #40 a. Rewrite first sentence, as it unclear as to its meaning; b. Need to address HOW the proposed uses of retail sales and one residential unit cannot fit onto this site without deviations; c. While this is being processed as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, need to compare the proposal to the retail sales standards for setbacks, building height and parking, especially in light of reductions to the standards (or increase for building height), in detail; and d. Need to be more specific (expound) as to "considering the surrounding community character ". 26. Page 1 of the application - Enter the Property Owner's name on the appropriate line. If the agent is the same as the Property Owner, then list such along with the appropriate mailing address, phone number(s) and email. This information is not the same as the Agent information. Revise. 27. 7/28/09 & 12/22/08 - WW Response to Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria #6 - It has been indicated as a response "a, b, c ". Provide a response that details HOW this proposal is in compliance with these objectives. 28. Unclear if the recorded Access, Egress and Usage Agreement - Waste Dumpster is acceptable to the Solid Waste Department. It was recorded in January 2009. 29. Potential condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: "That the applicant apply for City building permits for after- the -fact interior renovations, building additions and site improvements by xx, 2009 (three months from CDB date). Failure to submit for these permits within this time frame shall cause this Flexible Development approval by the CDB to be null and void and cause enforcement action to be initiated again;" 30. Potential condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: "That the final design of the building be consistent with the conceptual elevations submitted, or as modified by the CDB;" 31 . Potential condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: "That the site be limited to one monument sign, at a maximum, height of six feet, located outside of visibility triangles, containing the site address and be coordinated/consistent with the color and ' materials of the building;" 'Other.;. No: Comments Notes Siifficient- -= To`be placed on the 9/15/09 CDB agenda, submit 15 collated copies of the revised.plans- &.application material addressing, all above departments 'comments-by noon, 8/14/09. Packets shall be collated;_folded and,stapled.as ap-propriate..,• Development Review Agenda - Thursday, August 6, 2009 - Page 28 DRC Action Agenda I.I 0 0 7/28/09 Mixed Use Calculation for 503 Marshall Street Property is zoned Commercial District (maximum FAR = 0.55 and maximum density = 24 du /acre) 1. Project area ................ ............................... .......................7,727.96 sf 2. Permitted FAR in Commercial District .............. ........................0.55 3. Floor area permitted in Commercial District .. ............................... 4,250 sf 4. Floor area proposed ................................ ............................... 1,768 sf 5. Land area available for attached dwellings ( #1 minus #4) ...............5,959.96 sf 6. Land area in an acre ............................. ..............................— 43,560 sf 7. Lot acreage for attached dwellings ( #5 divided by #6) ..................= 0.136 acres 8. Multiply lot acreage (# 7) ....................... ............................... 0.136 acres 9. Maximum density in C District ................. ..............................x 24 du/acre 10. Maximum number of dwelling units permitted ............................ = 3 du 11. Number of dwelling units proposed ............ ..............................1 du (OK) 12. Proposed FAR ( #4 divided by #1) .................... ...........................0.22 13. Proposed density ( #11 divided by #8) ........... ..........................7.352 du/acre • Wells, Wayne • From: Hersh, Jim Sent: Tuesday, June 30, 2009 9:29 AM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: FLD2008 -02005 maps Attachments: AERIAL_FLD2008- 02005.docx; EXISTING_FLD2008- 02005.docx; LOCATION_ FLD2008- 02005.docx; Map Request Form 6.29.09.docx; ZONING FLD2008- 02005.docx Map Request Planner Name: Wayne Wells Case Number: FLD2008 -02005 Date Requested: June 29, 2009 Date Requested for (date): July 13, 2009 Maps Requested ® Location Map ® Aerial Map ® Zoning Map ® Existing Surrounding Uses Map Required Documents to be submitted to Engineering ® Legal Description Lr,(j*`- OK- IN-2- !�:JP4ey i3-( S tr4 Suf `L^Ca ® Survey e-zo ► -023 Jkl ® Map with Proposed Site Highlighted IN ADDITION TO THE REQUESTED MAPS, PLEASE PROVIDE VERIFICATION THAT THE LEGAL DESCRIPTION WE HAVE PROVIDED IS CORRECT A AC URATE. Thomas Mahony, PSM, Geographic Technology Manager '/"/' i n ure Map Name Owner: 1504 Garden, Inc. Case: FLD2008 -02005 Site: 503 Marshall Street Property Size: 0.18 acres PIN: 09/29/15/55530/000 /0100 Atlas Page: 2686 Wells, Wayne 9 From: We Wayne Sent: Monday, June 29, 2009 11:06 AM To: Hersh, Jim Cc: Herman, Jason Subject: Map Request for FLD2008- 02005, 503 Marshall Street Jim - Attached is a map request for Case FLD2008 -02005 for the property at 503 Marshall Street. Maps were previously created for this site under FLD2004- 02010. 1 will bring over the paperwork. The survey you may keep. Thanks- Wayne M. Wells, AICP Planner III City of Clearwater 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, FL 33756 -5520 Phone: 727 - 562 -4504 Fax: 727 - 562 -4865 r---Cq Map Request orm 6.29.09.doc • Map Request Planner Name: Wayne Wells Case Number: FLD2008 -02005 Date Requested: June 29, 2009 Date Requested for (date): July 13, 2009 Maps Requested Location Map ® Aerial Map ® Zoning Map ® Existing Surrounding Uses Map Required Documents to be submitted to Engineering ® Legal Description ® Survey ® Map with Proposed Site Highlighted IN ADDITION TO THE REQUESTED MAPS, PLEASE PROVIDE VERIFICATION THAT THE LEGAL DESCRIPTION WE HAVE PROVIDED IS CORRECT AND ACCURATE. Thomas Mahony, PSM, Geographic Technology Manager Signature Map Name Owner: 1504 Garden, Inc. Case: FLD2008 -02005 Site: 503 Marshall Street Property Size: 0.18 acres PIN: 09/29/15/55530/000 /0100 Atlas Page: 268B 11:10. am Case Number: FLD2008 -020- 503 MARSHALL ST' Owner(s): 1504 Garden Inc 1504 N Garden Ave Clearwater, 17133755 PLC TELEPHONE: No Phone, FAX: No. Fax, E -MAIL: No Email Representative: Todd Pressman rk1J 28870 Us Hwy 19 N Clearwater, F133761 TELEPHONE: 727 - 804 -1760, FAX: 727.669.8114, E -MAIL: pressinc @aol.com Location: 0.177. acres located at the southeast corner of North Ft.. Harrison Avenue and Marshall Street Atlas Page: 268B Zoning District: C, Commercial Request: Flexible Development approval to permit retail sales and services and warehousing/storage in the Commercial (C) District with a lot area of 7,720 square feet, a lot width of 50.81 feet along N. Ft. Harrison Avenue (west) and 149.95 feet along Marshall Street (north), a front (west) setback of xx feet (to pavement), a front (north) setback of xx feet (to building) and 5.71 feet (to pavement), a side (east) setback of 0.4 feet (to existing building), a side (south) setback of 1.3 feet (to existing building) and zero feet (to pavement), a building height of xx feet (to top of decorative tower) and nine spaces (xx spaces /1,000 square feet), as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2- 704.C; and a reduction to the landscape buffer along Marshall Street (north) from 10 to xx feet (to pavement), a reduction to the landscape buffer along the east property line from five to 0.4 feet (to existing building) and a reduction to the landscape buffer along the south property line from five to 1.3 feet (to existing building) and to zero feet (to pavement), as a Comprehensive Landscape Program, under the provisions of Section 3- 1202.G. Proposed Use: Retail sales and services Neighborhood Clearwater Neighborhoods Coalition Association(s): TELEPHONE: No Phone, FAX: No Fax, E- MAIL: No Email Neighborhood North Greenwood Association, Inc. Association(s): Clearwater, Fl 33755 1751. Kings Highway TELEPHONE: 560 -4382, FAX: No Fax, E- MAIL: WADENWADE@AOL.COM Neighborhood Bayview Heights Association(s): TELEPHONE:. 443 - 2550, FAX:.No. Fax, E -MAIL: No Email Neighborhood Old Clearwater Bay Neighborhood Association(s): Clearwater, 17133767 1828 Venetian Point Drive TELEPHONE: 461 -0564, FAX:. No Fax, E- MAIL: southem @tampabay.rr.com Presenter: Wayne Wells, Planner III Attendees Included: City: 3/6/08:. Wayne Wells, Neil Thompson, Scott Rice, Steve Doherty, Jim Keller, Rick Albee; 1/8/09: Wells, Tefft, Rice, Doherty, Keller, Mark Beery Applicant: 3/6/08: Hashim Sullaiman, Daniel Blignaut; 1/8/09: Todd Pressman, Sullaiman Other: Ron Delp The DRC reviewed this application with the following comments: General Engineering: Development Review Agenda Thursday, January 8, 2009 - Page 23 DRC Action Agenda 1.1 Prior to review bywommunity Development Board: 0 1. Show on a scaled drawing the proposed location of the dumpster enclosure. 2. Site plan is insufficient. Provide a utility plan that indicates how water, stormwater and sanitary sewer connections are to be made. 3. Site plan dimensions do not add up. (Sum of retention area, parking lot and building together with the proposed setbacks exceed lot depth). Provide a properly scaled plan with mathematically correct dimensions. Prior to. the issuance of a building permit: 1. Sidewalks and sidewalk ramps adjacent to. or a part of the project shall be designed and constructed consistent with City. of Clearwater Contract Specifications and Standards Index #109, including the A.D.A. (Truncated domes per D.O.T. Index #304.) Include Index #109 on the construction plans. Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy: 1. Provide a copy of an agreement, recorded in the Official Records of Pinellas County, allowing for shared use of a dumpster enclosure to be constructed on the adjacent property. The agreement shall be binding upon successors in title to both properties and determined to be legally acceptable by the City's Legal Department. 2. Applicant shall submit 5. sets of as -built drawings that are signed and sealed by a professional registered in the State of Florida. The Construction Services Inspector will field inspect as -built drawings for accuracy. General Note: If the proposed project necessitates infrastructure modifications to satisfy site - specific water capacity and pressure requirements and/or wastewater capacity requirements, . the modifications shall be completed by the applicant and at their expense. If underground water mains and hydrants are to be installed, the installation shall be completed and in- service prior to construction in accordance with Fire Department requirements. General Note: DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. Environmental: I . An Asbestos Survey is required prior to conducting any demolition or renovations. Please contact the Pinellas County Air, Quality Department at (727) 464 -4422 for further information. Fire: 1 . Fire Code requires a second means of egress from second floor, not shown on plan 12 -15 -08 Not addressed on page C4/7 of revised plan. Show intent to comply PRIOR TO CDB Harbor Master: 1 . No issues. Legal: 1 . No issues. Land Resources: I . No issues. Landscaping: Development Review Agenda - Thursday, January 8, 2009 - Page 24 DRC Action Ag®da 1.1 1 . 12/22/08 & 2/27 *WW 9 Sheets C2/5 and C5/5 - Must curb the east edge of the parking lot (south of new 4' sidewalk), the south edge of the parking lot and the west edge of the parking lot. 2. 12/22/08, 2/13/08 & 2/7/08 - WW Landscape Plan must show the location, size, AND quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, indicated by a key relating to the plant schedule. Landscape plan must show the quantities of all plant materials to be planted in the various areas of the site. 3. Sheet C5/7 - Revise for the following: a. Plant Material Schedule must indicate ALL plant materials to. be planted, including groundcover plants and sod; b. Provide foundation landscaping on the north and west sides of the building, indicating the plant materials to be planted within the foundation landscaped areas; c. Recommend on the north side of the building to start with foundation landscaping next to the building and then tier landscaping for perimeter landscaping in front of the foundation landscaping in a pleasing design pattern. Groundcover can be placed in front of shrubs. Sod can then be placed closer to the front property line.. Plant trees in a design pattern that won't block any proposed attached signage on the building; d. Show compliance with Code perimeter landscaping requirements on the plan. Recommend a tiering of landscaping on the west side of the retention pond in a pleasing design pattern with sod placed closer to the west property line; e. Keep proposed trees. outside of all visibility triangles; f. Eliminate. the second Note 1, which states "all plant material to be planted ", as this is assumed with the landscape plan that all landscape material shown will be planted as shown; g. Second Note 2 - Rewrite, as some information has been written over it making it unreadable; h. There are two "shadings" on the plan that are not called out as to what they are. Revise; i. Remove first Note #2, as it is unclear what this relates to and is not a Code provision; j. Shade trees should not be planted within 20 feet of overhead power lines (overhead lines are along Marshall Street and serve the convenience store to the east from Marshall Street)... Shade trees should also not be planted closer than 10 feet to the building.. Shade trees should not be planted closer than five feet to pavement.. Shade trees should also not be planted closer than 30 -35 feet to each other; k. Palms, to be counted as one shade tree, must be clustered together, not as shown on the plan;. and 1. Relocate the two LI on the west side to be planted reasonably close to each other. 4. Sheet C5/7 - Revise the Plant Material Schedule for the following: a. Plant Schedule indicates 4 LI, but there are only 2 LI indicated on the plan (2 LI on the. east side of the site are shown but not indicated); b.. Plant Schedule indicates 16 or 18. VS, but the plan does not detail how many. VS. shrubs are planted in each area; c. Written information is fuzzy and unreadable; and d. Include groundcover plants. 5 . Sheet C6/7 -. Revise for the following: a. Landscaping Note #8 - Shade trees must be 10' tall and 2.5" caliper at time of planting;. Accent trees can be 8'. tall and 2 ". caliper; and b. Tree & Shrub Planting Details Note #3 Mulch must be 3" thick (not 2 -3" thick). 6. Response to Comprehensive Landscape Program criteria #1. - Architectural Theme - You have responded to both part "a" and "b" of this criteria. a. With regard to response to part "a ", it is hard to find any "theme" with the landscape plan.. The plant materials and locations do not accent, nor highlight, any of the architectural features of the building.. Trees have been scattered haphazardly on this plan, with little thought as to their function and shading characteristics. This landscape plan does not show compliance with the minimum requirements of the Code. b. Recommend rather only providing a response to part "b Provide tiering of landscaping for interest and design, along with emphasizing building entries. See other Landscape comments that give guidance to the landscape design. Ensure the response addresses the reductions requested and HOW the proposed design compensates, mitigates and offsets the losses in certain areas by a more attractive design elsewhere on the site. Development Review Agenda Thursday, January 8, 2009 - Page 25 DRC Action Agenda 1.1 7 . Comprehensive *cape Program - Recommend including a nar* with this application, . detailing what the landscape requirements are, the reductions requested, the important factors of the landscape design and how this proposed landscape design exceeds the minimum Code requirements in areas of the site where the minimum Code is not being met. Parks and Recreation: 1 . Updated 12/17/08 - no issues. No issues less than one acre. Stormwater: 1 . The. following shall be addressed prior to. Community Development Board. 1. Provide only one drainage calculation signed and sealed by the professional engineer reflecting the current design. Information submitted for this review contradicts with one another and came from two different parties. The drainage calculation that was done by Ahmed Nawab shows the site data different than the one done by Adel M. Blassy.. Pond's cross sections on the current plan and the one done in 2004 are different. 2. Provide water quality. volume calculation.. 3. Provide a detailed stormwater narrative addressing existing and proposed conditions 4. Latest drainage calculation shows the total site area is 7720 sf , but only 5159sf contributes to the surface area runoff. Please delineate this information on the grading plan. 5. Please tie the pond outfall to the inlet nearby, not to the middle of the pipe. This outfall pipe shall be RCP and minimum of 15" in size. 6. Please show pond control structure and its detail.. 7. Drainage calculations and plan shall be' revised to show the pond side slope of maximum 4:1, not 3:1. as current design shows. The following shall be addressed prior to building permit. 1. Provide an approved SWFWMD. permit for the latest design. 2. Provide a 50' adjacent topography. along with the finished floor elevations of adjacent structures and existing storm sewers. 3. Show on grading plan the location of the pond's cross - sections. Pond cross sections shall show all the designed water levels, seasonal high water table, water table, and bank slope of 4:1. General note: 1. DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. 2. At building permit application, applicant shall submit all information again for review Solid Waste: How will solid waste be handled will need dumpster and enclosure. for size of project 2 -28 -2008 as agreed in FLD 2004 -02010 "That this site share the dumpster on the property to the. east, through appropriate agreements with the City and the abutting property owner. This off -site dumpster shall be upgraded with appropriate building permits and be properly located and screened to meet City requirements prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for this site." 12 -18 -2008 If applicant sells this parcel how will SW be handled? best to put another enclosure. and Dumpster at this location now so there is no questions of service at a later date Traffic Engineering: Development Review Agenda - Thursday, January 8, 2009 - Page 26 DRC Action Agwda 1.1 Planning: 1. Correct the ha6apped parking sign detail to read F.S. 318.180 2. Site plan not drawn to scale. 3. Provide a detail of truncated domes and place these at the ends of sidewalk where they . meet a driveway (Use FDOT Standard Index 304 sheet 6 of 6). http://www.dot.state.fl.us/rddesign/rd/RTDS/08/304.pdf 4. Show 20' x 20' sight visibility triangles correctly. (City's Community Development Code, Section 3 -904). 5. There shall be no objects in the sight triangle which does not meet the City's acceptable vertical height criteria at a level between 30 inches above grade and eight feet above grade for example monument sign. (City's Community Development Code, Section 3 -904). 6.. Show ramp in sidewalk to parking lot on the west side of the building. 7. Move the sight visibility triangle in the intersection of Marshall Street and Fort Harrison Avenue to the property lines as required by Community. Development Code Sec. 3 -904 A. The above to be addressed prior to a Community. Development Board (CDB) hearing. General Note(s): 1) Applicant shall comply with the current Transportation Impact Fee Ordinance and fee schedule and paid prior to a Certificate of Occupancy (C.O.). 2) DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. Development Review Agenda - Thursday, January 8, 2009 - Page 27 DRC Action Agenda 1.1 1 . 12/21/08 & 2/27/ *W • Since the property is legally described as one lot plus half of the abutting vacated alley, the following will be included as a condition of approval by the CDB: That, prior to the issuance of any permits, a Declaration of Unity of Title be recorded in the public records; 2. 12/22/08 & 2/27/08 - WW Sheet C2/7 - Unclear if the sidewalk in front of the handicap space is flush with the pavement or raised six inches above with a ramp? Show ramp location. 3. 12/22/08 & 2/28/08 - WW Sheet C7/7 ( "colored" elevations) - To be consistent with the north and east facades, indicate a tan area along the bottom of the west facade south of the tower to the south building line. 4. 12/22/08 & 2/28/08 - WW Sheet C2/7 - Per Section 3 -911, all on -site overhead utility lines must be placed underground with this proposal. Provide note that such will be done as part of the construction. 5. 12/22/08 & 2/13/08 - WW Sheets C2/7. & C5/7 Revise the visibility triangle at the intersection to be located along the property lines. 2/7/08 - WW Show on the civil site and landscape plans the sight visibility triangle at the intersection of N.. Ft. Harrison Avenue and Marshall Street. 6. 12/22/08. & 2/29/08. -. WW Sheets C4/7 and C7/7 - North and West elevations should show the location of any attached signage on the building (at least "SIGN'), if any are anticipated, so. signage can be coordinated with the exterior building design and proposed landscaping. 7. 12/22/08 & 2/27/08 - WW Request needs to include a building height increase for a decorative tower from 25 feet to xx feet (see other comments about providing the height of the tower from existing grade to top of tower). Request also needs to provide a justification for such increase. 8. Page 1 of the application has an incorrect parcel number.. Revise. 9. Page. 1 of the application lacks a "proposed use ". Unclear if there is only one use of the property of "retail sales ". on the first floor with accessory storage on the second floor or if there are two uses with "retail sales ". on the first floor and "warehousing/storage ". on the second floor. Unclear of what specific "retail sales and services" use is proposed. If two uses, what specific. "warehousing/stroage" use is proposed (provide all specifics possible, including operational characteristics)? Warehousing/storage is not a use generally permitted in the Commercial District. Unclear if Planning Staff will support a "warehousing/storage" use, especially when it is on the second floor. Advise /revise. 10. Page 1. of the application lacks a detailed description of the request. The current request, as written by Planning Staff, is "Flexible Development approval to permit retail sales and services and warehousing/storage in the Commercial (C) District with a lot area of 7,720 square feet, a lot width of 50.81 feet along N. Ft. Harrison Avenue (west) and 149.95 feet along Marshall Street (north), a front (west) setback of xx feet (to pavement), a front (north). setback of xx feet (to building). and 5.71 feet (to pavement), a side (east) setback of 0.4 feet (to existing building), a side (south) setback of 1.3 feet (to existing building) and zero. feet (to pavement), a building height of xx feet (to top of decorative tower) and nine spaces (xx spaces /1,000 square feet), as a Comprehensive. Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2- 704.C; and a reduction to the landscape buffer along Marshall Street (north) from 10 to xx feet (to pavement), a reduction to the landscape buffer along the east property line from five to 0.4 feet (to existing building) and a reduction to the landscape buffer along the south property line from five to 1.3 feet (to. existing building) and to zero feet (to pavement), as a Comprehensive Landscape Program, under the provisions of Section 3- 1202.G. Please incorporate into application and fill in the "xx" areas. While this will be processed as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, the applicant and Staff will need to review the request based on retail sales standards for setbacks, parking, height, etc. Development Review Agenda - Thursday, January 8, 2009 Page 28 DRC Active Agenda 1.1 11 . On Page 4 of the a*ation, the following is not complete: • ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF STORMWATER PLAN REQUIREMENTS (Applicant must initial one of the following): Stormwater plan as noted above is included. _Stormwater plan is not required and explanation narrative is attached. At a minimum, a grading plan and finished floor elevations shall be. provided. 12. On Page 7 of the application, the following is not complete: Acknowledgement of traffic impact study requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following): _Traffic. Impact Study is included. The studyy must include a summary table of pre - and post - development levels of service for all roadway legs and each turning movement at all intersections identified in the Scoping Meeting. _Traffic Impact Study is not required. 13.. On Page 7 of the application, the following is not complete: Acknowledgement of fire flow calculations /water study requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following): _Fire Flow Calculations/Water Study is included. _Fire. Flow Calculations/Water Study is not required. 14. Page 8 of the application, Affidavit to Authorize. Agent, has not been submitted (needs to be completed to authorize Todd Pressman as the agent). 15.. If there is to be only one use of the building (both floors) for a retail sales and services use, then parking is based on the gross floor area of the building. If such, at a total of 2,950 square feet of gross floor area and five parking spaces per 1,000 square feet, a total of 15 parking spaces are required. If such, Page 1 of the application indicates the request includes a reduction of parking.. No. Parking Demand Study has been submitted with findings demonstrating whether or not the deviation to the parking standard is acceptable. 16. A black and white Sheet C7/7 has been submitted. Need one colored version for the original case file. Additionally, please submit paint samples /swatches for the proposed exterior colors. 17. Sheet C4/7 - Revise for the following: a. Dimensions and written information are unreadable; b. Provide a height dimension from existing grade (not FFE) to top of flat roof; c. Provide a height dimension from existing grade (not FFE) to top of decorative tower; d. Provide a height dimension from the top of the flat roof to the top of the parapet; e. Scale of floor plans and elevations are not 1" = 1' -0 ". Provide correct scale; f. Provide the proposed building exterior materials and colors; g. Unclear why there is a "foyer" on the second floor. ( ?); h. If floor plans and elevations on the left side are "existing and those in the middle and right side are "proposed ", then label as such; and i. If the building is to be only one. use utilizing both floors, unclear why the hvac equipment is being placed on the ground floor in a closet when the entire second floor is supposed to be storage ( ?). 18. Sheet C4/7 - Gross floor area depictions on the right hand side indicates the first floor to be 1,396 . square feet for the first floor. Gross floor area must include the HVAC room... Revise. 19. Sheets C2/7 & C5/7. -. Need to properly show any proposed freestanding/monument signage, . which should be coordinated with proposed landscaping... Required sign setback is five feet from any property line. Revise. 20. Sheet C1 /7 - Update in the bottom left comer the survey information date, since a newer survey has been submitted. Development Review Agenda -. Thursday, January. 8, 2009 - Page 29 DRC Action Agmda 1.1 21 . Sheet C1 /7 Revi& Site Data for the following: 0 a. Proposed Usage - Unclear if there are two proposed uses of the building, with retail sales on the first floor and warehousing on the second floor, or if there is only one proposed use of the building of retail sales, where the second floor is accessory storage for the retail sales use. Advise /revise; b. Proposed building coverage is indicated as 1,397 square feet to remain. Sheet C4/7 indicates the gross floor area of the first floor to be 1,396 square feet. Based on the dimensions on the survey, the proposed building coverage should be 1,755 square feet; c. Proposed setbacks - This is a corner lot where only front and side setbacks apply.. Eliminate "rear ". Differentiate between front (north) and front (west), as well as side (south) and side (east) in the. table. Ensure the dimensions indicated are correct and indicate the proposed setback to the building as well as to pavement; d. Based on the revised height dimensions on Sheet C4/7 (see other Planning comments), ensure . the Proposed Building Height dimensions are consistent with that depicted on Sheet C4/7; e. Proposed Impervious Surface Ratio and Open Space- Ensure these numbers are correct (see comment "b" above); f. Depending on the answer to "a" above, revise parking calculations. If only one use (retail sales. with accessory storage), then calculate on basis of 5 spaces per 1,000 sf gross floor area. If two uses, then retail sales is calculated on basis of 5 spaces per 1,000 sf gross floor area for that use and warehousing is 1.5 spaces per 1,000 sf for the gross floor area for that use. 22. Sheet C2/7 - Unclear why there are two #9 Important Job. Notes/References, since #1 and the second #9 relate to the same issue. Suggest elimination of the second #9. 23. Sheet C2/7 - Provide dimensions for the following: a. Dimensions from all property lines to the existing/proposed building (additional wall extensions are being added to the north and west walls of the building). Since the lot is not square, need to show dimensions to both corners of the building on the north, east and south sides, of the building; b. Dimensions from Marshall Street property line to the northeast corner of the parking row closest the building and the northwest corner of the western parking row; c. Dimensions from N. Ft.. Harrison Avenue property line to the northwest and southwest,corners of the parking lot; d. If the northeast corner of the existing building is 0.4 feet from the east property line, the drawing appears to not locate the building correctly (scales at approximately 1.5 feet from the east property line); e. Dimension the width of the foundation landscape area on the west side of the building; and f. Unclear what the. 6.42' dimension at the southwest comer of the building depicts. 24. Sheets C2/7. and C5/7 - Building Code will require an accessible path to a public way from the door on the east side of the north side of the building. Sheet C2/7 does not show any sidewalk, different than Sheet C5/7. Coordinate the sidewalk on both sheets. 25. Sheets C2/7 and C5/7 - Suggest extending the sidewalk to the front door on the northwest corner of the building to the entire opening of the foyer on both the north and west sides of the building. 26. Response to General Applicability criteria #1 - a. Need to describe, in detail (not generalities), HOW the criteria is being met. Describe the surrounding commercial uses that you indicate as being better or equal to; b. Unclear of the nature of this "successful" developer, and what this has to do with the application (experience indicated on this plan is not one of "success "); c. Unclear what "C- stores" is; d. Unclear . of the meaning of the last two sentences. Are you saying this proposal is better than the surrounding uses or equal to the surrounding uses?. Expound. 27 Response to General Applicability criteria #2 - a. Unclear of the nature of this "successful" developer, and what this has to. do with the application (experience indicated on this plan is not one of "success "); b. Unclear HOW the proposed improvements will cause significant improvements in the vicinity and HOW this proposal will be a leader of investment, since there has been more recent investment in the property to the south. 28. Response to General Applicability criteria #3 - Provide a response to the criteria as to HOW this proposal will not have any adverse effects. Talk about the positive improvements relating to health and safety. Development Review Agenda - Thursday, January 8, 2009 - Page 30 DRC Action Ag®da 1.1 29 . Response to GeneOpplicability criteria #4 - a. Unclear how a warehouse use is a "non -use" and how it is less than an accessory use (when it would be a primary use); and b. As a warehouse use, one may assume increased truck traffic and truck parking on the premises, which is not provided for in the parking lot.. Unclear how this is an improvement. 30. Response to General Applicability criteria #5 - Revise in the last sentence "loeader" to "leader ". 31 . Response to General Applicability. criteria #6 - Response could address the improvement to the visual aspect of this property with the proposal, with the elimination of the duplex on the corner, along with the proposed building, parking and landscaping improvements. Address hours of operation impacts. 32. Response to Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria #1 -. a. Unclear of what is meant by the first sentence relating to the positive surrounding uses; b. Warehousing/storage as a primacy use may have more negative impacts on the site than anticipated or discussed and may be more intense. Need to. address why this use should be permitted on this site; c.. Unclear what retail sales and services uses you are referring to... Be more specific.. Likewise, . be more specific for the proposed warehousing/storage use; and d. While this is being processed as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, need to compare the proposal to the retail sales standards for setbacks, building height and,parking, especially in light of reductions to the standards (or increase for building height), in detail. 33. Response to Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria #2 -. a. Warehousing/storage use is not a use permitted in the Commercial District. Unclear how is this use consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and the Code? Statement is that this use ( ?) is common in the immediate area; unclear. where; and b. Unclear of the nature of this "successful' developer, and what this has to do with the application (experience indicated on this plan is not one of "success "). 34. Response to Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria #3 - a.. Unclear if the statements made relate only to the proposed retail sales use or if it includes the proposed warehousing/storage use; and b. Need to explain, in detail, HOW these proposed uses meet this criteria. Expound. 35 . Response to Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria #4. - a. Unclear if the statements made relate only to. the proposed retail sales use or if it includes the proposed warehousing/storage use; b. Need to explain, in detail, HOW these proposed uses meet this criteria. Expound; and c. Warehousing/storage as a primary use may have more negative impacts on the site than anticipated or discussed and may be more intense.. Need to address why this use should be permitted on this site. 36. Response to Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria #5 - It has been indicated as a response "a, b, a ". Provide a response that details HOW this proposal is in compliance with this criteria. 37. Response to Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria #6 - It has been indicated as a response "a, b, c ". Provide a response that details HOW this proposal is in compliance with this criteria. 38. Project Name on Application (Marshall Building) is not reflected in the title blocks on the plans.. Revise the plans. Other: No Comments Notes: Application is insufficient to move forward to CDB. Revise application material & resubmit (one original & 14 copies) for additional DRC review (1/12/09 for 2/5/09 DRC or 2/2/09 for 3/5/09 DRC). Development Review Agenda - Thursday, January 8, 2009 - Page 31 DRC Action Agenda 1. 1 11:10 am I Case Number: FLD2008 -020 503 MARSHALL ST Owner(s): 1504 Garden Inc 1504 N Garden Ave ' • O Clearwater, 17133755 TELEPHONE: No Phone, FAX: No Fax, E -MAIL: No Email hm Representative: Todd Pressman �� 28870 Us Hwy 19 N Clearwater, Fl 33761 TELEPHONE: 727 - 804 - 1760, FAX: 727.669.8114, E -MAIL: pressinc @aol.com Location: 0.177 acres located at the southeast corner of North Ft. Harrison Avenue and Marshall Street Atlas Page: 268B Zoning District: C, Commercial Request: Flexible'Development approval to permit retail sales and services and warehousing/storage in the Commercial (C) District with a lot area of 7,720 square feet, a lot width of 50.81 feet along N. Ft. Harrison Avenue (west) and 149.95 feet along Marshall Street (north), a front (west) setback of xx feet (to pavement), a front (north) setback of xx feet (to building) and 5.71 feet (to pavement), a side (east) setback of 0.4 feet (to existing building), a side (south) setback of 1.3 feet (to existing building) and zero feet (to pavement), a building height of xx feet (to top of decorative tower) and nine spaces (xx spaces /1,000 square feet), as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2- 704.C; and a reduction to the landscape buffer along Marshall Street (north) from 10 to xx feet (to pavement), a reduction to. the landscape buffer along the east property line from five to 0.4 feet (to existing building) and a reduction to the landscape buffer along the south property line from five to 1.3 feet (to existing building) and to zero. feet (to pavement), as a Comprehensive Landscape Program, under the provisions of Section 3- 1202.G. Proposed Use: Retail sales and services Neighborhood Clearwater Neighborhoods Coalition Association(s): TELEPHONE: No Phone, FAX: No Fax, E- MAIL: No Email Neighborhood North Greenwood Association, Inc. Association(s): Clearwater, 17133755 1751 Kings Highway TELEPHONE: 560 -4382, FAX: No Fax, E -MAIL: WADENWADE@AOL.COM Neighborhood Bayview Heights Association(s): TELEPHONE:. 443 -2550, FAX: No Fax, E -MAIL: No Email Neighborhood Old Clearwater Bay Neighborhood Association(s): Clearwater, 17133767 1828 Venetian Point Drive TELEPHONE: 461 -0564, FAX: No. Fax, E- MAIL: southern @tampabay.rr.com Presenter: Wayne Wells, Planner III Attendees Included: City: 3/6/08: Wayne. Wells, Neil Thompson, Scott Rice, Steve Doherty, Jim Keller, Rick Albee; 1/8/09: Wells, Tefft, Rice, Doherty, Keller, Glenn Applicant: 3/6/08: Hashim Sullaiman, Daniel Blignaut; 1/8/09: Todd Pressman, Sullaiman Other: Ron Delp The DRC reviewed this application with the following comments: General Engineering: Development Review Agenda - Thursday, January 8, 2009 - Page 18 DRC Action Agenda 1.1 Prior to review by Oommunity Development Board: • 1. Show on a scaled drawing the proposed location of the dumpster enclosure. 2. Site plan is insufficient. Provide a utility plan that indicates how water, stormwater and sanitary sewer connections are to be made. 3. Site plan dimensions do. not add up. (Sum of retention area, parking lot and building together with the proposed setbacks exceed lot depth). Provide a properly scaled plan with mathematically correct dimensions. Prior to the issuance of a building permit: 1. Sidewalks and sidewalk ramps adjacent to or a part of the project shall be designed and constructed consistent with City. of Clearwater Contract Specifications and Standards Index #109, including the A.D.A. (Truncated domes per D.O.T. Index #304.) Include. Index #109. on the construction plans. Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy: 1. Provide a copy of an agreement, recorded in the Official Records of Pinellas County, allowing for shared use of a dumpster enclosure to be constructed on the adjacent property. The agreement shall be binding upon successors in title to. both properties and determined to be legally acceptable by the City's Legal Department. 2. Applicant shall submit 5 sets of as -built drawings that are signed and sealed by a professional registered in the State of Florida. The Construction Services Inspector will field inspect as -built drawings for accuracy. General Note:. If the proposed project necessitates infrastructure. modifications to satisfy site - specific water capacity and pressure requirements and/or wastewater capacity requirements, the modifications shall be completed by the applicant and at their expense. If underground water mains and hydrants are to be installed, the installation shall be completed and in- service prior to construction in accordance with Fire Department requirements. . General Note: DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. Environmental: 1 . An Asbestos Survey is required prior to conducting any demolition or renovations. Please contact the Pinellas County Air Quality Department at (727) 464 -4422 for further information. Fire: Fire Code requires a second means of egress from second floor, not shown on plan 12 -15 -08 Not addressed on page C4/7 of revised plan. Show intent to comply PRIOR TO CDB Harbor Master: 1 . No issues. Legal: 1 . No issues. Land Resources: 1 . No issues. Landscaping: Development Review Agenda - Thursday, January 8, 2009 - Page 19 DRC Action Agenda 1.1 4. 5. 6 12/22/08 & 2/27AWW • Sheets C2/5 and C5/5 - Must curb the east edge of the parking lot (south of new 4' sidewalk), . the south edge of the parking lot and the west edge of the parking lot. 12/22/08, 2/13/08 & 2/7/08 - WW Landscape Plan must show the location, size, AND quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, indicated by a key relating to the plant schedule.. Landscape plan must show the quantities of all plant materials to be planted in the various areas of the site. Sheet C5/7 - Revise for the following: a. Plant Material Schedule must indicate ALL plant materials to be planted, including groundcover plants and sod; b. Provide foundation landscaping on the north and west sides of the building, indicating the plant materials to be planted within the foundation landscaped areas; c. Recommend on the north side of the building to start with foundation landscaping next to the building and then tier landscaping for perimeter landscaping in front of the foundation landscaping in a pleasing design pattern. Groundcover can be placed in front of shrubs.. Sod can then be placed closer to the front property. line. Plant trees in a design pattern that won't block any proposed attached signage on the building; d. Show compliance with Code perimeter landscaping requirements on the plan. Recommend a tiering of landscaping on the west side of the retention pond in a pleasing design pattern with sod placed closer to the west property line; e. Keep proposed trees outside of all visibility triangles; f. Eliminate the second Note 1, which states "all plant material to be planted ", as this is assumed with the landscape plan that all landscape material shown will be planted as shown; g. Second Note 2 Rewrite, as some information has been written over it making it unreadable; h. There are two "shadings" on the plan that are not called out as to what they are.. Revise; i. Remove first Note #2, as it is unclear what this relates to and is not a Code provision; j. Shade trees should not be planted within 20 feet of overhead power lines (overhead lines are along Marshall Street and serve the. convenience store to the east from Marshall Street). Shade . trees should also not be planted closer than 10 feet to the building. Shade trees should not be planted closer than five feet to pavement. Shade trees should also not be planted closer than 30 -35 feet to each other; k. Palms, to be counted as one shade tree, must be clustered together, not as shown on the plan; and 1. Relocate the two LI on the west side to be planted reasonably close to each other. Sheet C5/7 - Revise the Plant Material Schedule for the following: a. Plant Schedule indicates 4 LI, but there are only 2 LI indicated on the plan (2 LI on the east side of the site are shown but not indicated); b. Plant Schedule indicates 16 or 18 VS, but the plan does not detail how many VS shrubs are planted in each area; c. Written information is fuzzy and unreadable; and d. Include groundcover plants. Sheet C6/7 Revise for the following: a. Landscaping Note #8 -. Shade trees must be 10' tall and 2.5". caliper at time of planting; Accent trees can be 8' tall and 2" caliper; and b. Tree & Shrub Planting Details Note #3 Mulch must be 3" thick (not 2 -3" thick). Response to Comprehensive Landscape Program criteria #1 - Architectural Theme - You have responded to both part "a" and "b" of this criteria. a. With regard to response to part "a ", it is hard to find any. "theme" with the landscape plan.. The plant materials and locations do not accent, nor highlight, any of the architectural features of the building. Trees have been scattered haphazardly on this plan, with little thought as to their function and shading characteristics. This landscape plan does not show compliance with the minimum requirements of the Code. b. Recommend rather only providing a response to part "b ". Provide tiering of landscaping for interest and design, along with emphasizing building entries. See other Landscape comments that give guidance to the landscape design. Ensure the response addresses the reductions requested and HOW the proposed design compensates, mitigates and offsets the losses in certain areas by a more attractive design elsewhere on the site. Development Review Agenda Thursday, January. 8, 2009 Page 20 DRC Action Agenda 1.1 7 . Comprehensive 41scape Program - Recommend including a nan& with this application, detailing what the landscape requirements are, the reductions requested, the important factors of the landscape design and how this proposed landscape design exceeds the minimum Code requirements in areas of the site where the minimum Code is not being met. Parks and Recreation: 1 . Updated 12/17/08 -. no issues. No issues less than one acre. Stormwater: 1 . The following shall be addressed prior to Community Development Board. 1. Provide only one drainage calculation signed and sealed by the professional engineer reflecting the current design. Information submitted for this review contradicts with one another and came from two different parties. The drainage calculation that was done by Atoned Nawab shows the site data different than the one done by Adel M. Blassy.. Pond's cross sections on the current plan and the one done in 2004 are different.. 2. Provide water quality volume calculation.. 3. Provide a detailed stormwater narrative addressing existing and proposed conditions 4. Latest drainage calculation shows the total site area is 7720 sf , but only 5159sf contributes to the surface area runoff. Please delineate this information on the grading plan. 5. Please tie the pond outfall to the inlet nearby, not to the middle of the pipe. This outfall pipe shall be RCP and minimum of 15" in size. 6. Please. show pond control structure and its detail. 7. Drainage calculations and plan shall be revised to show the pond side slope of maximum 4:1,. not 3:1 as current design shows. The following shall be addressed prior to building permit. 1: Provide an approved SWFWMD permit for the latest design.. 2. Provide a 50'. adjacent topography along with the finished floor elevations of adjacent structures and existing storm sewers. 3. Show on grading plan the location of the pond's cross - sections. Pond cross sections shall show all the designed water levels, seasonal high water table, water table, and bank slope of 4:1. General note: 1. DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. 2. At building permit application, applicant shall submit all information again for review Solid Waste: How will solid waste. be handled will need dumpster and enclosure for size of project 2 -28 -2008 as agreed in FLD 2004 -02010 "That this site share the dumpster on the property to the east, through appropriate agreements with the City and the abutting property. owner. This off -site dumpster shall be upgraded with appropriate building permits and be properly located and screened to meet City requirements prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for this site." 12 -18 -2008 If applicant sells this parcel how will SW be handled? best to put another enclosure and Dumpster at this location now so there is no questions of service at a later date Traffic Engineering: Development Review Agenda Thursday, January 8, 2009 Page 21 DRC Action Ag®da 1.l Planning: 1. Correct the ha&pped parking sign detail to read F.S. 318.18. .2. Site plan not drawn to scale. 3. Provide a detail of truncated domes and place these at the ends of sidewalk where they meet a driveway (Use FDOT Standard Index 304 sheet 6 of 6). http://www.dot.state.fl.us/rddesign/rd/RTDS/08/304.pdf 4. Show 20' x 20' sight visibility triangles correctly. (City's Community Development Code, Section 3 -904). 5. There shall be no objects in the sight triangle which does not meet the City's acceptable vertical height criteria at a level between 30 inches above grade and eight feet above grade for example monument sign. (City's Community Development Code, Section 3 -904). 6. Show ramp in sidewalk to parking lot on the west side of the building. 7. Move the sight visibility, triangle in the intersection of Marshall Street and Fort Harrison Avenue to the property lines as required by Community Development Code. Sec. 3 -904. A. The above to be addressed prior to a Community Development Board (CDB) hearing. General Note(s): 1) Applicant shall comply with the current Transportation Impact Fee. Ordinance and fee schedule and paid prior to a Certificate of Occupancy (C.O.). . 2) DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. Development Review Agenda -. Thursday, January 8, 2009 - Page 22 DRC Action Ag®da 1.1 1 . 12/21/08 & 2/27/0 'WW • Since the property is legally described as one lot plus half of the abutting vacated alley, the following will be included as a condition of approval by the CDB: That, prior to the issuance of any permits, a Declaration of Unity of Title be recorded in the public records; 2. 12/22/08 & 2/27/08 - WW Sheet C2/7 - Unclear if the sidewalk in front of the handicap space is flush with the pavement or raised six inches above with a ramp? Show ramp. location. 3 . 12/22/08 & 2/28/08 - WW Sheet C7/7 ( "colored" elevations) - To be consistent with the north and east facades, indicate a . tan area along the bottom of the west facade south of the tower to the south building line. 4. 12/22/08 & 2/28/08 - WW Sheet C2/7 - Per Section 3 -911, all on -site overhead utility lines must be placed underground with this proposal. Provide note that such will be. done as part of the construction. 5 12/22/08 & 2/13/08 - WW Sheets C2/7 & C5/7 -. Revise the visibility triangle at the intersection to be located along the property lines. 2/7/08 WW Show on the civil site and landscape plans the sight visibility triangle at the intersection of N. Ft. Harrison Avenue and Marshall Street. 6. 12/22/08 & 2/29/08 - WW Sheets C4/7 and C7/7 - North and West elevations should show the location of any attached signage on the building (at least "SIGN "), if any. are anticipated, so signage can be coordinated with the exterior building design and proposed landscaping. 7. 12/22/08 & 2/27/08 -1 WW Request needs to include a building height increase for a decorative tower from 25. feet to xx feet (see other comments about providing the height of the tower from existing grade to top. of tower). Request also needs to provide a justification for such increase. 8. Page 1 of the application has an incorrect parcel number. Revise. 9. Page 1 of the application lacks a "proposed use ". Unclear if there is only one use of the property of "retail sales" on the first floor with accessory storage on the second floor or if there are two uses with "retail sales" on the first floor and "warehousing/storage" on the second floor. Unclear of what specific "retail sales and services" use is proposed. If two uses, what specific. "warehousing/stroage" use is proposed (provide all specifics possible, including operational characteristics)? Warehousing/storage is not a use generally permitted in the Commercial District. Unclear, if Planning Staff will support a "warehousing /storage" use, especially when it is on the second floor.. Advise /revise. 10. Page 1 of the application lacks a detailed description of the request. The current request, as written by Planning Staff, is "Flexible Development approval to permit retail sales and services and warehousing/storage in the Commercial (C) District with a lot area of 7,720 square feet, a lot width of 50.81 feet along N. Ft. Harrison Avenue (west) and 149.95 feet along Marshall Street (north), a front (west) setback of xx feet (to. pavement), a front (north) setback of xx feet (to building) and 5.71 feet (to pavement), a side (east) setback of 0.4 feet (to existing building), a side (south) setback of 1.3 feet (to existing building). and zero feet (to pavement), a building height of xx feet (to top of decorative tower) and nine spaces (xx spaces /1,000 square feet), as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2- 704.C; and a reduction to the landscape buffer along Marshall Street (north) from 10 to xx feet (to pavement), a reduction to the landscape buffer along the east property line from five to 0.4 feet (to existing building) and a reduction to the landscape buffer along the south property line from five to 1.3 feet (to existing building). and to zero feet (to pavement), as a Comprehensive Landscape. , Program, under the provisions of Section 3- 1202.G. Please incorporate into application and fill in the "xx" areas.. While this will be processed as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, .the applicant and Staff will need to review the request based on retail sales standards for setbacks, parking, height, etc. Development Review Agenda - Thursday, January 8, 2009 -. Page 23 DRC Action Agmda 1.1 11 . On Page 4 of the a0ation, the following is not complete: • ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF STORMWATER PLAN REQUIREMENTS (Applicant must initial one of the following): Stormwater plan as noted above is included. _Stormwater plan is not required and explanation narrative is attached. At a minimum, a grading plan and finished floor elevations shall be provided. 12. On Page 7 of the application, the following is not complete: Acknowledgement of traffic impact study requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following)`. _Traffic Impact Study is included. The study must include a sun-unary table of pre- and post- development levels of service for all roadway legs and each turning movement at all intersections identified in the Scoping Meeting. _Traffic Impact Study is not required. 13. On Page 7 of the application, the following is not complete: Acknowledgement of fire flow calculations /water study requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following): _Fire. Flow Calculations/Water Study is included. _Fire. Flow Calculations/Water Study is not required. 14. Page 8 of the application, Affidavit to Authorize. Agent, has not been submitted (needs to be completed to authorize Todd Pressman as the agent). 15. If there is to be only one. use of the building (both floors) for a retail, sales and services use, then parking is based on the gross floor area of the building. If such, at a total of 2,950 square feet of gross floor area and five parking spaces per 1,000 square feet, a total of 15 parking spaces are required. If such, Page 1 of the application indicates the request includes a reduction of parking. No Parking Demand Study has been submitted with findings demonstrating whether or not the deviation to the parking standard is acceptable. 16. A black and white Sheet C7/7 has been submitted.. Need one colored version for the original case file. Additionally, please submit paint samples /swatches for the proposed exterior colors. 17. Sheet C4/7 -. Revise for the following: a. Dimensions and written information are unreadable; b.. Provide a height dimension from existing grade (not FFE) to top of flat roof; c. Provide a height dimension from existing grade (not FFE) to top of decorative tower; d. Provide a height dimension from the top of the flat roof to the top of the parapet; e. Scale of floor plans and elevations are not 1" = V -0 ". Provide correct scale; f. Provide the proposed building exterior materials and colors; g. Unclear why there is a "foyer" on the second floor ( ?); h. If floor plans and elevations on the left side are "existing" and those in the middle and right side are "proposed ", then label as such; and i. If the building is to be only one use utilizing both floors, unclear why the hvac equipment is being placed on the ground floor in a closet when the entire second floor is supposed to be storage ( ?). 18. Sheet C4/7 Gross floor area depictions on the right hand side indicates the first floor to be 1,396 square feet for the first floor. Gross floor area must include the HVAC room. Revise. 19_ Sheets C2/7 & C5/7 - Need to properly show any proposed freestanding/monument signage, which should be coordinated with proposed landscaping. Required sign setback is five feet from any property line. Revise. 20. Sheet C1/7 -. Update in the. bottom left comer the survey information date, since a newer survey has been submitted. Development Review Agenda - Thursday, January 8, 2009 -. Page 24 DRC Action Agwda 1.1 21 . Sheet C1 /7 - Revis* Site Data for the following: • a. Proposed Usage - Unclear if there are two proposed uses of the building, with retail sales on the first floor and warehousing on the second floor, or if there is only one proposed use of the building of retail sales, where the second floor is accessory storage for the retail sales use. Advise /revise; b. Proposed building coverage is indicated as 1,397 square feet to remain. Sheet C4/7 indicates the gross floor area of the first floor to be 1,396 square feet. Based on the. dimensions on the survey, the proposed building coverage should be 1,755 square feet; c. Proposed setbacks - This is a comer lot where only front and side setbacks apply. Eliminate. "rear ". Differentiate between front (north) and front (west), as well as side (south) and side (east). in the table. Ensure the dimensions indicated are correct and indicate the proposed setback to the building as well as to pavement; d. Based on the revised height dimensions on Sheet C4/7 (see other Planning comments), ensure the Proposed Building Height dimensions are consistent with that depicted on Sheet C4/7; e. Proposed Impervious Surface Ratio and Open Space Ensure these numbers are correct (see comment "b" above); f. Depending on the answer to "a ". above, revise parking calculations. If only one use (retail sales with accessory storage), then calculate on basis of 5. spaces per 1,000 sf gross floor area. If two uses, then retail sales is calculated on basis of 5. spaces per 1,000 sf gross floor area for that use and warehousing is 1.5 spaces per 1,000 sf for the gross floor area for that use. 22. Sheet C2/7 Unclear why there are two #9 Important Job. Notes/References, since #1. and the second #9. relate to the same issue. Suggest elimination of the second #9. 23. Sheet C2/7 - Provide dimensions.for the following: a. Dimensions from all property lines to the existing/proposed building (additional wall extensions are being added to the north and west walls of the building). Since the lot is not square, need to. show dimensions to both comers of the. building on the north, east and south sides of the building; b. Dimensions from Marshall Street property line to the northeast comer of the parking row closest the building and the northwest corner of the western parking row; c. Dimensions from N. Ft. Harrison Avenue property line to the northwest and southwest corners of the parking lot; d. If the northeast corner of the. existing building is 0.4 feet from the east property line, the drawing appears to not locate the building correctly (scales at approximately 1.5. feet from the east property line); e. Dimension the width of the foundation landscape area on the west side of the building; and f. Unclear what the 6.42' dimension at the southwest corner of the building depicts. 24. Sheets C2/7 and C5/7. -. Building Code will require an accessible path to a public way from the door on the east side of the north side of the building. Sheet C2/7 does not show any sidewalk, different than Sheet C5/7. Coordinate the sidewalk on both sheets. 25 . Sheets C2/7 and C5/7 Suggest extending the sidewalk to the front door on the northwest corner of the building to the entire opening of the foyer on both the north and west sides of the building. 26. Response to General Applicability criteria #1 - a. Need to describe, in detail (not generalities), HOW the criteria is being met. Describe the surrounding commercial uses that you indicate as being better or equal to; b. Unclear of the nature of this "successful' developer, and what this has to do with the application (experience indicated on this plan is not one of "success "); c. Unclear what "C- stores" is; d. Unclear of the meaning of the last two sentences. Are you saying this proposal is better than the surrounding uses or equal to the surrounding uses? Expound. 27. Response to General Applicability criteria #2 - a. Unclearr of the nature of this "successful' developer, and what this has to do with the application (experience indicated on this plan is not one of "success "); b. Unclear HOW the proposed improvements will cause significant improvements in the vicinity and HOW this proposal will be a leader of investment, since there has been more recent investment in the property to the south. 28.. Response to General Applicability criteria #3 Provide a response to the criteria as to HOW this proposal will not have any adverse effects. Talk about the positive improvements relating to health and safety. Development Review Agenda - Thursday, January 8, 2009 Page 25 DRC Action Agamda I.I ♦ 29 . Response. to Gene )*pplicability criteria #4 - 0 a. Unclear how a warehouse use is a "non -use" and how it is less than an accessory use (when it would be a primary use); and b. As a warehouse use, one may assume increased truck traffic and truck parking on the premises, which is not provided for in the parking lot. Unclear how this is an improvement. 30. Response to General Applicability. criteria #5 - Revise in the last sentence "loeader" to "leader ". 31 . Response to General Applicability. criteria #6 - Response could address the improvement to the visual aspect of this property with the proposal, with the elimination of the duplex on the corner, along with the proposed building, parking and landscaping improvements. Address hours of operation impacts. 32 Response to Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria #1 - a. Unclear of what is meant by the first sentence relating to the positive surrounding uses; b. Warehousing/storage as a primary use may have more negative impacts on the site than anticipated or discussed and may be more intense. Need to address why this use should be permitted on this site; c.. Unclear what retail sales and services uses you are referring to. Be more specific. Likewise, be more specific for the proposed warehousing /storage use; and d. While this is being processed as a Comprehensive. Infill Redevelopment Project, need to compare the proposal to the retail sales standards for setbacks, building height and parking, especially in light of reductions to the standards (or increase for building height), in detail. 33 . Response to Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria #2 - a. Warehousing/storage use is not a use permitted in the Commercial District. Unclear how is this use consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and the Code ?. Statement is that this use ( ?) is common in the immediate area; unclear where; and b. Unclear of the nature of this "successful' developer, and what this has to do with the application (experience indicated on this plan is not one of "success "). 34. Response to Comprehensive. Infill Redevelopment Project criteria #3 - a. Unclear if the statements made relate only to the proposed retail sales use or if it includes the proposed warehousing/storage use; and b. Need to explain, in detail, HOW these proposed uses meet this criteria. Expound. 35 . Response to Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria #4 - a. Unclear if the statements made relate only to the proposed retail sales use or if it includes the proposed warehousing/storage use; b.. Need to explain, in detail, HOW these proposed uses meet this criteria. Expound; and c. Warehousing/storage as a primary use may have more negative impacts on the site than anticipated or discussed and may be more intense.. Need to address why this use should be permitted on this site. 36. Response to Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria #5 - It has been indicated as a response "a, b, e ". Provide a response that details HOW this proposal is in compliance with this criteria. 37. Response to Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria #6 -. it has been indicated as a response "a, b, c ".. Provide a response that details HOW this proposal is in compliance with this criteria. 38. Project Name on Application (Marshall Building) is not reflected in the title blocks on the plans. Revise the plans. Other: No Comments Notes: Application is insufficient to move forward to CDB. Revise application material & resubmit (one original & 14. copies) for additional DRC review (1/12/09 for 2/5/09 DRC or 2/2/09 for 3/5/09 DRC). Development Review Agenda - Thursday, January. 8, 2009 - Page 26 DRC Action Agenda 1.1 0, • 9:35 am Case Number: FLD2008 4 05 -- 503 MARSHALL ST Owner(s): 1504 Garden Inc • O 1504 N Garden Ave U060 to Clearwater, 17133755 vxtw TELEPHONE: No Phone, FAX: No Fax, E -MAIL: No Email Representative: Hashim Sullaiman Cam► 14927 Lake Forest Drive Lutz ,17133559 TELEPHONE: 813 - 841 -8712, FAX: 813 - 433 -5553, E -MAIL: hsullaiman @aol.com Location: 0.177 acres located at the southeast corner of North Ft. Harrison. Avenue and Marshall Street Atlas Page: 268B Zoning District: C, Commercial Request: Flexible Development approval to permit offices in the Commercial (C) District with a reduction to lot area from 10,000 to 7,720 square feet, a reduction to lot width along N. Ft. Harrison Avenue (west) from 100 to 50.81 feet, reductions to the front (north) setback from 25 to 18 feet (to building) and to three feet (to pavement), a reduction to the front (west) setback from 25 feet to 22 feet (to pavement), a reduction to the side (east) setback from 10 feet to 0.4 feet (to existing building), reductions to the side (south) setback from 10 feet to 1.3 feet (to existing building) and to zero feet (to pavement), an increase to building height for a decorative tower from 25 feet to xx feet and a reduction to required parking from 14 spaces (four spaces /1,000 square feet) to nine spaces (2.647 spaces /1,000 square feet), as a Comprehensive lnfill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2- 704.C; and a reduction to the landscape buffer along Marshall Street (north) from 10 to three feet (to pavement), a reduction to the landscape buffer along the east property line from five to 0.4 feet (to existing building) and a reduction to the landscape buffer along the south property line from five to 1.3 feet (to existing building) and to zero feet (to pavement), as a Comprehensive Landscape Program, under the provisions of Section 3- 1202.G. Proposed Use: Offices Neighborhood Clearwater Neighborhoods Coalition Association(s): Clearwater, Fl 33758 P O Box 8204 TELEPHONE: No Phone, FAX: No Fax, E -MAIL: No Email Neighborhood North Greenwood Association, Inc. Association(s): Clearwater, F133755 1201 Douglas Road TELEPHONE: 560 -4382, FAX: No Fax, E -MAIL: WADENWADE @AOL.COM Neighborhood Bayview Heights Association(s): Clearwater, 17133755 625 Minnesota Drive TELEPHONE: 443 -2550, FAX: No Fax, E -MAIL: No Email Neighborhood Old Clearwater Bay Neighborhood Association(s): Clearwater, FI 33767 1828 Venetian Point Drive TELEPHONE: 461 -0564, FAX: No Fax, E-NIAIL:.southem@tampabay.rr.com Presenter: Wayne Wells, Planner III Attendees Included: City: Wayne Wells, Neil Thompson, Scott Rice, Steve Doherty, Jim Keller, Rick Albee Applicant: Hashim Sullaiman, Daniel Blignaut Other: Ron Delp The DRC reviewed this application with the following comments: General Engineering: Development Review Agenda - Thursday, March 6, 2008 - Page 6 DRC Actimi Agcnda 1.1 e. t 1 . Prior to the issuance of a building permit: 1. Turning radii at all driveways shall be a minimum of 30 feet per City of Clearwater Contract Specifications and Standards index #108. 2. Sidewalks and sidewalk ramps adjacent to or a part of the project shall be designed and constructed consistent with City of Clearwater Contract Specifications and Standards Index #109, including the A.D.A. (Truncated domes per D.O.T. Index #304.) Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy: 1. Applicant shall submit 5 sets of as -built drawings that are signed and sealed by a professional registered in the State of Florida. The Construction Services Inspector will field inspect as -built drawings for accuracy. General Note: If the proposed project necessitates infrastructure modifications to satisfy site - specific water capacity and pressure requirements and/or wastewater capacity requirements, the modifications shall be completed by the applicant and at their expense. If underground water mains and hydrants are to be installed, the installation shall be completed and in service prior to construction in accordance with Fire Department requirements. General Note: DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. Environmental: Fire: An Asbestos Survey is required prior to conducting any demolition or renovations. Please contact the Pinellas County Air Quality Department at (727) 464 -4422 for further information. Show 30' Radii for new curbing into parking lot page C2 /5.PRIOR TO CDB Fire Code requires a second means of egress from second floor, not shown on plan Harbor Master: 1 . No issues. Legal: 1 No issues. Land Resources: 1 . Also show thw 14" oak at the NW corner to be removed as it is too close to the pond top of bank. Revised prior to CDB. Landscaping: Development Review Agenda - Thursday, March 6, 2008 - Page 7 DRC Action Ag-du I.I Response to Comprehensive Landscape Program criteria #4 - Bason the proposed landscape plan submitted, unclear what is meant by the "quality of the proposed plantings" and the meaning of the "professional landscape design ", seeing that the submitted plan does not even meet minimum Code requirements. Write something that actually means something, based on evidence on the plan and the reductions requested as to HOW it would improve property values of the surrounding area. Response to Comprehensive Landscape Program criteria #3 - a. This should be renumbered as #2 (see form). b. This response states no lighting is proposed at this time, yet Note #3 on Sheet C2/5 indicates outdoor lighting will be solely on the building. Which is it? Read and address the criteria (current response doesn't address the criteria). Response to Comprehensive Landscape Program criteria #1 - Architectural Theme - The landscape plan is extremely weak and it is hard to find any "theme ". Unclear what a "Contemporary theme" is. The plant materials and locations do not accent, nor highlight, any of the architectural features of the building. Trees have been scattered haphazardly on this plan, with little thought as to their function and shading characteristics. This landscape plan does not show compliance with the minimum requirements of the Code. This property is not in the downtown and reference to such should be removed. You have chosen part "a" of this criteria, whereas you should be responding to part "b" of this criteria. Provide tiering of landscaping for interest and design, along with emphasizing building entries. See other Landscape comments above that give guidance to the landscape design. Ensure the response addresses the reductions requested and HOW the proposed design compensates, mitigates and offsets the losses in certain areas by a more attractive design elsewhere on the site. Site Data on Sheet C1 /5 indicates 28% interior landscape area being provided. Sheets C2/5 and C5/5 (twice) include in the legend a crosshatched symbol for interior landscape area. Per Section 3- 1202.E.1, since there is less than 4,000 sf of proposed, paved vehicular use area, NO interior landscape area is required. Revise the Site Data table on Sheet C1 /5 appropriately and remove the crosshatched symbol for interior landscape area from the legends on Sheets C2/5 and C5/5 (twice). Sheet C5/5 - a. Plant Material Schedule must indicate ALL plant materials to be planted. b. Remove Note #2 from this sheet and show the trees on the plan and place such in the Plant Material Schedule. c. Remove from the legend near the bottom of the sheet the "variegated jasmine," show the location of such on the plan and place such in the Plant Material Schedule. d. Remove Note #3 and instead show compliance with this Code section on the plan with the quantities provided on the plan and as part of the total number in the Plant Material Schedule. e. Remove Note #4 and instead show compliance on the plan. f. Remove Note #5, as I believe this relates to interior landscaping, which no interior landscape area is required for this proposal. g. Provide foundation landscaping on the north and west sides of the building. h. Recommend on the north side of the building to start with foundation landscaping next to the building and then tier landscaping for perimeter landscaping in front of the foundation landscaping in a pleasing design pattern. Sod can then be placed closer to the front property line. Plant trees in a design pattern that won't block any proposed attached signage on the building. i. Show compliance with Code perimeter landscaping requirements on the plan. Recommend a tiering of landscaping on the west side of the retention pond in a pleasing design pattern with sod placed closer to the west property line. j. Based on the lot and building dimensions and the tree spacing for perimeter and foundation requirements, a minimum of 12 shade trees are required to be planted on this site (includes any replacement trees required by Rick Albee). As part of the Comprehensive Landscape Program, since some of these trees cannot be planted on the south and east sides of the property, these trees can be planted in other areas of the site for mitigation purposes. Two accent trees = one shade tree. Three palms = one shade tree. k. Plant Material Schedule - Crape myrtle may be 2" caliper; remove the box from around the 10' for Washington Palm. 1. Keep proposed trees outside of all visibility triangles. Development.Review Agenda - Thursday, March 6, 2008 - Page 8 DRC Action Agenda I.I 6 . 2/13/08 & 2/7/li3- WW Plant schedule with a key (symbol or label) indicating the size, description, specifications, QUANTITIES (of all plant materials), and spacing requirements of all existing and proposed landscape materials, including botanical and common names. Schedule must include the total quantities for VS and variegated jasmine (include in the Schedule). 7. Sheet C5/5 - a. Remove from the legend "variegated jasmine" as it is inappropriate for this sheet; and b. Legend has a box for "new asphalt" but it is not shaded in. Either remove this from the legend or provide a shade in the box and on the site plan to indicate the pavement, as right now it is white, just like the retention pond and the building. 8 . Response to Comprehensive Landscape Program criteria #2 - a. This should be criteria #3 (see the form). b. The response doesn't address the surrounding community character, whether what is proposed is - consistent with the surrounding landscaping or whether it will be greater than what surrounds this site. Unclear what is meant by "pedestrian friendly" (this site is not in the downtown). Address the reductions requested and how you cannot meet the requirements and HOW this design mitigates or offsets the loss of landscaping in certain areas by planting more in other areas. 9. Sheet C2/5 - a. Remove from the legend "variegated jasmine" as it is inappropriate for this sheet; and b. Legend has a box for "new asphalt" but it is not shaded in. Either remove this from the legend or provide a shade in the box and on the site plan to indicate the pavement, as right now it is white, just like the retention pond and the building. 10. Response to Comprehensive Landscape Program criteria #5 - This site is NOT within the downtown area. This site is NOT within ANY special area or scenic corridor plan. What is written is meaningless to this site. Eliminate all such existing language. An appropriate response to this criteria is "Not applicable ". 11 . 2/13/08 & 2/7/08 - WW Landscape Plan must show the location, size, AND quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, indicated by a key relating to the plant schedule. Landscape plan must show the quantities of all plant materials to be planted in the various areas of the site. 12. Sheets C2/5 and C5/5 - Must curb the east edge of the parking lot (south of new 4' sidewalk), the south edge of the parking lot and the west edge of the parking lot. 13 . Comprehensive Landscape Program Narrative - Revise for the following: a. Foundation Landscaping - There is a five -foot requirement along the west and north sides of the building. Site and Landscape Plans show compliance mith this requirement on both sides of the building. Unclear why you are requesting a reduction ( ?). Eliminate from this Narrative. b. Vehicular Use Landscaping - Since none is required, it should be eliminated from this Narrative. c. Landscape Buffer - The "required" buffer along the rear (south) is five feet, not 10 feet. Note: The Comprehensive Landscape Program request only includes the reductions to the perimeter landscape buffers along the north, east and south sides of the property. Parks and Recreation: No issues - less than one acre. Stormwater: Development Review Agenda - Thursday, March 6, 2008 - Page 9 DRC Acd... Apndx I 1 . The following snail be addressed prior to Community DevelopmeOnBoard. 1. Provide only one drainage calculation signed and sealed by the professional engineer reflecting the current design. Information submitted for this review contradicts with one another and came from two different parties. The drainage calculation that was done by Ahmed Nawab shows the site data different than the one done by Adel M. Blassy. Pond's cross sections on the current plan and the one done in 2004 are different. 2. Provide water quality volume calculation. 3. Provide a detailed stormwater narrative addressing existing and proposed conditions 4. Latest drainage calculation shows the total site area is 7720 sf , but only 5159sf contributes to the surface area runoff. Please delineate this information on the grading plan. 5. Please tie the pond outfall to the inlet nearby, not to the middle of the pipe. This outfall pipe shall be RCP and minimum of 15" in size. 6. Please show pond control structure and its detail. The following shall be addressed prior to building permit. 1. Provide an approved SWFWMD permit for the latest design. 2. Provide a 50' adjacent topography along with the finished floor elevations of adjacent structures and existing storm sewers. 3. Show on grading plan the location of the pond's cross - sections. Pond cross sections shall show all the designed water levels, seasonal high water table, water table, and bank slope of 4:1. General note: 1. DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. 2. At building permit application, applicant shall submit all information again for review Solid Waste: 1 . How will solid waste be handled will need dumpster and enclosure for size of project 2 -28 -2008 as agreed in FLD 2004 -02010 "That this site share the dumpster on the property to the east, through appropriate agreements with the City and the abutting property owner. This off -site dumpster shall be upgraded with appropriate building permits and be properly located and screened to meet City requirements prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for this site." Traffic Engineering: 1 . There shall be no objects in the sight triangle over the City's acceptable vertical height criteria. (City's Community Development Code, Section 3 -904). Move the parking space in the northwest corner of the parking lot toward the building 2 -feet. 2. Provide truncated domes where sidewalk crosses a driveway. 3. Change the the Florida Statute number to read 318.18. 4. Curb radius shall be 30' per Community Development Code Sec. 3 -1905 D. Planning: The above to be addressed prior to a Community Development Board (CDB) hearing. General Note(s): 1) Applicant shall comply with the current Transportation Impact Fee Ordinance and fee schedule and paid prior to a Certificate of Occupancy (C.O.). 2) DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. Development Review Agenda - Thursday, March 6, 2008 - Page 10 DRC Action Ag.,& 1.1 I . Exhibit A - Applicable Flexibility Criteria - Remove as this is being processed as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project. The justification to the reductions to setbacks and parking must be addressed through the Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria. 2. Sheet 1/5 - Revise the Site Data for Proposed Impervious Surface Ratio, from 0.63 to 0.625 (63% and 37.5% (open space] = 100.5 %, which is not possible). 3 . Sheet 115 - Revise the Site Data for Required Parking from eight spaces to 14 spaces and revise the Parking Calculations to indicate 4 spaces per 1,000 sf and 3,400/1,000 = 3.4 x 4 = 14 spaces. The Parking Demand Study should be providing the justification for a parking reduction. 4. Since the property is legally described as one lot plus half of the abutting vacated alley, the following will be included as a condition of approval by the CDB: That, prior to the issuance of any permits, a Declaration of Unity of Title be recorded in the public records; 5 . Sheet C3/6 - a. Provide a height dimension from existing grade to top of roof (Sheet Cl /5 indicates such dimension is 20.58 feet); and b. Revise the height of the decorative tower to be measured from existing grade (not FFE) to top of tower. 6. Index of Sheets on Sheet C1 /5 indicates a total of five sheets. However, a Demolition Plan has been added as Sheet C6/6. Revise for the following: a. Revise the Index of Sheets to add the Demolition Plan as Sheet C6/6; b. Renumber Sheets C1 /5 - C5/5 to reflect there are now six sheets, not five; and c. Number the Elevations as Sheet C3/6. 7. Exhibit A - Response to General Applicability Criteria #2 - Do not answer the criteria with the criteria language. Provide a response as to HOW the proposal will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent properties and buildings or significantly impair the value of the adjacent properties. Be specific as to the surrounding uses and the surrounding property values. 8 . Exhibit A - Include a title above Paragraph 1 stating "Responses to General Applicability Criteria ". 9. Exhibit A - Description of Request - a. Unclear of what is meant on the third line by "miscellaneous uses on the second floor ". The Code does not have such "miscellaneous use" listed in the Commercial District. Be more specific as the the proposed use of the second floor with a use listed in the Commercial District. b. Revise to match what I have written so that it is all inclusive. 10. Sheet C3/6 - North and West elevations should show the location of any attached signage on the building (at least "SIGN "), if any are anticipated, so signage can be coordinated with the exterior building design. 11 . Page 1 of the application - a. Provide the "Legal Description" on the form or state "See attached" and then attach the legal description. b. Revise the "Description of Request" to state "See attached ". 12. Sheet C3/6 - On the proposed north facade elevation, there should be a vertical line indicating the edge of a wall corner on the ground floor under the decorative tower (see floor plan above the elevation). Show this vertical line. 13 . Per Section 3 -911, any on -site overhead utility lines must be placed underground with this proposal. Provide note that such will be done as part of the construction. 14. I am confused. Site data on Sheet C1 /5 indicates there is 1700 square feet existing and proposed on the first floor and 1700 square feet on the second floor. Need to accurately provide the EXISTING and the PROPOSED floor area for each floor. a. It is recommended to calculate gross floor area according to the Code definition. b. Sheet C3/5 indicates the office on the first floor to be 1680 square feet. Is this existing or proposed, seeing there is a small addition to make a closet on the north side of the building near the entrance? c. Sheet C3/5 indicates the office on the second floor to be 760 square feet and 1000 square feet storage. This adds up to 1760 square feet (not 1700). This is extremely important to provide accurate information because parking calculations are based on this information. 15 . Sheet C3/6 (colored elevations) - To be consistent with the north and east facades, indicate a tan area along the bottom of the west facade south of the tower to the south building line. Development Review Agenda - Thursday, March 6, 2008 - Page 11 DRC Action Agmidu 1.1 Development Review Agenda - Thursday, March 6, 2008 - Page 12 DRC Action Agcnde I.1 in 16 . Based on the floor plans on Sheet C3/5, is this one two -story office space or two offices a two -story building (one office unit on the first floor and one office unit on the second floor)? 17. Sheet C2/5 - Unclear if the sidewalk in front of the handicap space is flush with the pavement or raised six inches above with a ramp? Show ramp location. 18. 2/13/08 - WW Revise the visibility triangle at the intersection to be located along the property lines. 2/7/08 - WW Show on the civil site and landscape plans the sight visibility triangle at the intersection of N. Ft. Harrison Avenue and Marshall Street. 19. Sheet C2/5 - Note #7 - What is meant by "similar nature usage "? 20. Exhibit A - Response to General Applicability Criteria #1 - Describe the surrounding commercial uses that you are indicating this proposal is consistent with and the character of the surrounding area. 21 . Sheets C2/5 & C5/5 - Need to properly show any proposed freestanding /monument signage, which should be coordinated with proposed landscaping. There is also a statement near the center top of Sheet C2/5 "Monument Type 6' High Sign" that doesn't relate to anything on the plan. Revise. 22 . Exhibit A - Response to General Applicability Criteria #3 - Unclear as to what is meant by the last sentence. Be specific, not vague. 23 . Exhibit A - Response to General Applicability Criteria #4 - Response is insufficient. HOW are traffic impacts being improved (suggestion: parking that backs out into Marshall Street is being removed and replaced with a parking lot meeting Code requirements). Might also mention how pedestrian and vehicular conflicts will be improved by removal of the backout parking. 24. Exhibit A - Response to General Applicability Criteria #5 - Response is inadequate. HOW is the proposal compatible and consistent with the surrounding uses. Be specific. 25 . Last page of narrative - a. First paragraph - The subject property is not located in the Downtown District, which is approximately 2000 feet to the south, so it is unclear how this project is fulfilling redevelopment of downtown. Also, unclear as to reference to Garden Avenue as a walkable commercial district. Unclear as to need for this paragraph. b. Second paragraph - Again, this property is not located in the Downtown District and not within the Downtown area, so there are no applicable downtown guidelines for this project. Unclear as to need for this paragraph. c. Sixth paragraph - Unclear, if this is proposed to be office uses, what products /services are being displayed to pedestrians that are approximately 20 feet from the building. d. Seventh paragraph - Since this is an existing building and not a proposed building, unclear what is meant by "the placement of the building ". Also, since this building is located on and is oriented toward Marshall Street primarily and N. Ft. Harrison Avenue secondarily, unclear how this building's placement creates "a presence on Garden Avenue" (for which it has no frontage on). Unclear as to any creation of a pedestrian friendly walkway. e. Last paragraph - Unclear as to what is meant by being an addition to "the entry" to the City's downtown. 26 . Response to Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria #1 - Reponse is inadequate. Explain in detail HOW the redevelopment of this parcel is impractical without deviations to setbacks, parking, buffers and height. 27. Response to Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria #2 - Response is inadequate. Explain in detail HOW the proposal complies with this criteria. 28 . Response to Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria #3 - Response is inadequate. Explain in detail HOW is this project compatible with the surrounding properties. Explain in detail HOW the reductions to setbacks, buffers and parking will not impede improvement of surrounding properties or set an unnecessary precedent for not meeting Code requirements, especially parking requirements. 29. Response to Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria #4 - Response provided does not address the criteria. Additionally, the existing building is two story; this is not a proposed building that is being designed. 30 . Response to Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria #5 - Provide an appropriate response to this criteria, most likely objectives a, b and c. Development Review Agenda - Thursday, March 6, 2008 - Page 12 DRC Action Agcnde I.1 31 . Response to Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria #p- Provide a detailed, specific response that addresses ALL of the objectives of this criteria, based on all the setback, buffer and parking reductions and a height increase for the decorative tower. 32 . Parking Demand Study - Exhibits C and D - Totally unclear what these relate to and why they are included. The Study does not reference Exhibits C and D at all. Exhibits C and D review parking observations at a retail center in a totally different part of town on two different days. This was never discussed with Wayne Wells. 33 . Parking Demand Study - Discussion and Conclusion - Based on the comments on the Introduction and Methodology sections, the numbers of required parking spaces and the reduction required from 14 to nine spaces is incorrectly portrayed. The conclusion is inaccurate and cannot be supported by the Planning Department. 34 . Parking Demand Study - Methodology: a. As I noted in my email to Hashim on October 26, 2007; in response to a draft Parking Demand Study, I noted that the October 23, 2007, meeting was with Wayne Wells alone and that a scoping meeting was also necessary with Traffic Engineering. Unclear is such meeting ever occurred. b. We never agreed to a methodology of using ITE Trip Generation rates as a basis for a Parking Demand Study. As I noted in my email to Hashim on October 26, 2007, in response to a draft Parking Demand Study for "retail sales" on both floors (one user in the entire building) "I have talked to Himanshu Patni in Traffic Engineering and we both agree that the basis for determining parking demand is not a direct correlation to Trip Generation by particular uses. It may be used to assist in explaining certain characteristics of parking demand, but not the basis for determining parking demand. I possibly thought that part of your basis would be that the second floor would be used exclusively for storage of products for the first floor." There has been no meeting to discuss the development of a methodology for a Parking Demand Study for 'office" uses in this building. 35 . Parking Demand Study - Introduction: a. First paragraph - There are not two two -story existing buildings on site. The existing duplex is one -story in height. b. Second paragraph - You characterize the remodeling to the exterior of the building as "minor facade changes ". Based on the elevations submitted, I would not so characterize these changes as "minor," especially in light of the decorative tower being proposed. c. Fourth paragraph - The minimum required parking for offices is four spaces per 1,000 square feet, not three. Table 2 -704 provides for an acceptable range of between three and four spaces per 1,000 square feet. Parking calculations must start with four spaces per 1,000 square feet. Building square footage amounts are inconsistent throughout this proposal. Need to accurately calculate the Gross Floor Area for this building (floors one and two) in order to use such in the parking calculations. At 3,400 square feet of building GFA and four spaces per 1,000 square feet, 14 parking spaces are required. Only nine parking spaces are being provided, at a ratio of 2.64 spaces per 1,000 square feet (based on 3,400 square feet of GFA). d. Fifth paragraph - Totally unclear what this is and how it relates to the Parking Demand Study. Remove this paragraph. 36. Sheet C2/5 - If the western property line length is 50.81 feet and parking spaces are nine feet wide, unclear why there is only a three -foot dimension indicated from the north property line to the edge of pavement. Five parking spaces @ nine feet wide each = 45 feet. 50.81 - 45 feet = 5.81 feet. There is some triangulation of the property as the east property line is 50.17 feet, so the dimension from the north property line to the edge of pavement at the western edge of the western parking row should be slightly less than 5.81 feet (not three feet). Likewise, check the dimension from the north property line to the edge of pavement for the eastern parking row to ensure it is six feet. 37 . Remove from Sheets C2/5, C4/5 and C5/5 the Index of Sheets (only necessary on Sheet C1 /6). 38 . Request needs to include a building height increase for a decorative tower from 25 feet to xx feet (see other comments .about providing the height of the tower from existing grade to top of tower). Request also needs to provide a justification for such increase. Development Review Agenda - Thursday, March 6, 2008 - Page 13 DRC Aawn Agenda 1.1 39 . Code requires ASection 3- 1406.B.2 a minimum stacking distance of 20 feet from the front property line on Marshall Street to the first parking space. Indicated is three feet. Any reduction to this stacking length requirement must be supported by a traffic study. Either meet the required stacking length or provide a traffic study specifically relating to this requirement that justifies the reduction. 40. Sheet C115 - Revise Site Data for Proposed Bldg Height to reflect height from existing grade to top of roof (not from FFE), revise the height for the top of parapet, as it is taller than indicated (since a new facade on the east side of the north elevation is being constructed [indicated at 24' -6 ", but needs to be measured from existing grade to top of this new parapet and not FFE]). Other: No Comments Notes: This application is insufficient to move forward to the CDB. Revise application material and resubmit one original and 14 copies for additional DRC review. Development Review Agenda - Thursday, March 6, 2008 - Page 14 DRC Action Aguida I.I 9:35 am Case Number: FLD2008- 02t�05 -- 503 MARSHALL ST Owner(s): 1504 Garden Inc 3• 4606 1504 N Garden Ave Clearwater, F133755 1 TELEPHONE: No Phone, FAX: No Fax, E -MAIL: No Email Representative: Hashim Sullaiman cookW4400drs 14927 Lake Forest Drive Lutz, F133559 TELEPHONE: 813 - 841 -8712, FAX: 813- 433 -5553, E -MAIL: hsullaiman @aol.com Location: 0.177 acres located at the southeast corner of North Ft. Harrison Avenue and Marshall Street Atlas Page: 268B Zoning District: C, Commercial Request: Flexible Development approval to permit offices in the Commercial (C) District with a reduction to lot area from 10,000 to 7;720 square feet, a reduction to lot width along N. Ft. Harrison Avenue (west) from 100 to 50.81 feet, reductions to the front (north) setback from 25 to 18 feet (to building) and to three feet (to pavement), a reduction to the front (west) setback from 25 feet to 22 feet (to pavement), a reduction to the side (east) setback from 10 feet to 0.4 feet (to existing building), reductions to the side (south) setback from 10 feet to 1.3 feet (to existing building) and to zero feet (to pavement), an increase to building height for a decorative tower from 25 feet to xx feet and a reduction to required parking from 14 spaces (four spaces /1,000 square feet) to nine spaces (2.647 spaces /1,000 square feet), as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment.Project, under the provisions of Section 2- 704.C; and a reduction to the landscape buffer along Marshall Street (north) from 10 to three feet (to pavement), a reduction to the landscape buffer along the east property line from five to 0.4 feet (to existing building) and a reduction to the landscape buffer along the south property line from five to 1.3 feet (to existing building) and to zero feet (to pavement), as a Comprehensive Landscape Program, under the provisions of Section 3- 1202.G. Proposed Use: Offices Neighborhood Clearwater Neighborhoods Coalition Association(s): Clearwater, F133758 P O Box 8204 TELEPHONE: No Phone, FAX: No Fax, E -MAIL: No Email Neighborhood North Greenwood Association, Inc. Association(s): Clearwater, F133755 1201 Douglas Road TELEPHONE: 560 -4382, FAX: No Fax, E -MAIL: WADENWADE @AOL.COM Neighborhood Bayview Heights Association(s): Clearwater, F133755 625 Minnesota Drive TELEPHONE: 443 -2550, FAX: No Fax, E -MAIL: No Email Neighborhood Old Clearwater Bay Neighborhood Association(s): Clearwater, F133767 1828 Venetian Point Drive TELEPHONE: 461 -0564, FAX: No Fax, E -MAIL: southern @tampabay.rr.com Presenter: Wayne Wells, Planner III Attendees Included: City: Wayne Wells, Neil Thompson, Scott Rice, Steve Doherty, Jim Keller, Rick Albee Applicant: Hashim Sullaiman, Ram Goel The DRC reviewed this application with the following comments: General Engineering: Development Review Agenda - Thursday, March 6, 2008 - Page 8 DRC Action Agenda 1.1 �I 'v Prior to the issuance of a building permit: 1. Turning radii at all driveways shall be a minimum of 30 feet per City of Clearwater Contract Specifications and Standards index #108. 2. Sidewalks and sidewalk ramps adjacent to or a part of the project shall be designed and constructed consistent with City of Clearwater Contract Specifications and Standards Index #109, including the A.D.A. (Truncated domes per D.O.T. Index #304.) Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy: 1. Applicant shall submit 5 sets of as -built drawings that ate signed and sealed by a professional registered in the State of Florida. The Construction Services Inspector will field inspect as -built drawings for accuracy. General Note: If the proposed project necessitates infrastructure modifications to satisfy site - specific water capacity and pressure requirements and/or wastewater capacity requirements, the modifications shall be completed by the applicant and at their expense. If underground water mains and hydrants are to be installed, the installation shall be completed and in service prior to construction in accordance with Fire Department requirements. General Note: DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. Environmental: An Asbestos Survey is required prior to conducting any demolition or renovations. Please contact the Pinellas County Air Quality Department at (727) 464 -4422 for further information. Fire: 1 . Show 30' Radii for new curbing into parking lot page C2 /5.PRIOR TO CDB Harbor Master: Legal: No issues. No issues. Land Resources: 1 . Also show thw 14" oak at the NW corner to be removed as it is too close to the pond top of bank. Revised prior to CDB. Landscaping: Development Review Agenda - Thursday, March 6, 2008 - Page 9 DRC Action Agcnda 1.1 1 . 2/13/08 & 2 /7 /40P- WW • Landscape Plan must show the location, size, AND quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, indicated by a key relating to the plant schedule. Landscape plan must show the quantities of all plant materials to be planted in the various areas of the site. 2. 2/13/08 & 2/7/08 - WW Plant schedule with a key (symbol or label) indicating the size, description, specifications, QUANTITIES (of all plant materials), and spacing requirements of all existing and proposed landscape materials, including botanical and common names. Schedule must include the total quantities for VS and variegated jasmine (include in the Schedule). 3 . Site Data on Sheet C1 /5 indicates 28% interior landscape area being provided. Sheets C2/5 and C5/5 (twice) include in the legend a crosshatched symbol for interior landscape area. Per Section 3- 1202.E.1, since there is less than 4,000 sf of proposed, paved vehicular use area, NO interior landscape area is required. Revise the Site Data table on Sheet C1 /5 appropriately and remove the crosshatched symbol for interior landscape area from the legends on Sheets C2/5 and C5/5 (twice). 4. Sheets C2/5 and C5/5 - Must curb the east edge of the parking lot (south of new 4' sidewalk), the south edge of the parking lot and the west edge of the parking lot. 5 . Sheet C2/5 - a. Remove from the legend "variegated jasmine" as it is inappropriate for this sheet; and b. Legend has a box for "new asphalt" but it is not shaded in. Either remove this from the legend or provide a shade in the box and on the site plan to indicate the pavement, as right now it is white, just like the retention pond and the building. 6. Sheet C5/5 - a. Remove from the legend "variegated jasmine" as it is inappropriate for this sheet; and b. Legend has a box for "new asphalt" but it is not shaded in. Either remove this from the legend or provide a shade in the box and on the site plan to indicate the pavement, as right now it is white, just like the retention pond and the building. 7. Sheet C5/5 - a. Plant Material Schedule must indicate ALL plant materials to be planted. b. Remove Note #2 from this sheet and show the trees on the plan and place such in the Plant Material Schedule. c. Remove from the legend near the bottom of the sheet the "variegated jasmine," show the location of such on the plan and place such in the Plant Material Schedule. d. Remove Note #3 and instead show compliance with this Code section on the plan with the quantities provided on the plan and as part of the total number in the Plant Material Schedule. e. Remove Note #4 and instead show compliance on the plan. f. Remove Note #5, as I believe this relates to interior landscaping, which no interior landscape area is required for this proposal. g. Provide foundation landscaping on the north and west sides of the building. h. Recommend on the north side of the building to start with foundation landscaping next to the building and then tier landscaping for perimeter landscaping in front of the foundation landscaping in a pleasing design pattern. Sod can then be placed closer to the front property line. Plant trees in a design pattern that won't block any proposed attached signage on the building. i. Show compliance with Code perimeter landscaping requirements on the plan. Recommend a tiering of landscaping on the west side of the retention pond in a pleasing design pattern with sod placed closer to the west property line. j. Based on the lot and building dimensions and the tree spacing for perimeter and foundation requirements, a minimum of 12 shade trees are required to be planted on this site (includes any replacement trees required by Rick Albee). As part of the Comprehensive Landscape Program, since some of these trees cannot be planted on the south and east sides of the property, these trees can be planted in other areas of the site for mitigation purposes. Two accent trees = one shade tree. Three palms = one shade tree. k. Plant Material Schedule - Crape myrtle may be 2" caliper; remove the box from around the 10' for Washington Palm. 1. Keep proposed trees outside of all visibility triangles. Development Review Agenda - Thursday, March 6, 2008 - Page 10 DRC Action Apnda 1.1 Comprehensive Landscape Program Narrative - Revise for the Allowing: a. Foundation Landscaping - There is a five -foot requirement along the west and north sides of the building. Site and Landscape Plans show compliance with this requirement on both sides of the building. Unclear why you are requesting a reduction ( ?). Eliminate from this Narrative. b. Vehicular Use Landscaping - Since none is required, it should be eliminated from this Narrative. c. Landscape Buffer - The "required" buffer along the rear (south) is five feet, not 10 feet. Note: The Comprehensive Landscape Program request only includes the reductions to the perimeter landscape buffers along. the north, east and south sides of the property. 9. Response to Comprehensive Landscape Program criteria #1 - Architectural Theme - The landscape plan is extremely weak and it is hard to find any "theme ". Unclear what a "Contemporary theme" is. The plant materials and locations do not accent, nor highlight, any of the architectural features of the building. Trees have been scattered haphazardly on this plan, with little thought as to their function and shading characteristics. This landscape plan does not show compliance with the minimum requirements of the Code. This property is not in the downtown and reference to such should be removed. You have chosen part "a" of this criteria, whereas you should be responding to part "b" of this criteria. Provide tiering of landscaping for interest and design, along with emphasizing building entries. See other Landscape comments above that give guidance to the landscape design. Ensure the response addresses the reductions requested and HOW the proposed design compensates, mitigates and offsets the losses in certain areas by a more attractive design elsewhere on the site. 10. Response to Comprehensive Landscape Program criteria #2 - a. This should be criteria #3 (see the form). b. The response doesn't address the surrounding community character, whether what is proposed is consistent with the surrounding landscaping or whether it will be greater than what surrounds this site. Unclear what is meant by "pedestrian friendly" .(this site is not in the downtown). Address the reductions requested and how you cannot meet the requirements and HOW this design mitigates or offsets the loss of landscaping in certain areas by planting more in other areas. 11 . Response to Comprehensive Landscape Program criteria #3 - a. This should be renumbered as #2 (see form). b. This response states no lighting is proposed at this time, yet Note #3 on Sheet C2/5 indicates outdoor lighting will be solely on the building. Which is it? Read and address the criteria (current response doesn't address the criteria). 12. Response to Comprehensive Landscape Program criteria #4 - Based on the proposed landscape plan submitted, unclear what is meant by the "quality of the proposed plantings and the meaning of the "professional landscape design ", seeing that the submitted plan does not even meet minimum Code requirements. Write something that actually means something, based on evidence on the plan and the reductions requested as to HOW it would improve property values of the surrounding area. 13 . Response to Comprehensive Landscape Program criteria #5 - This site is NOT within the downtown area. This site is NOT within ANY special area or scenic corridor plan. What is written is meaningless to this site. Eliminate all such existing language. An appropriate response to this criteria is "Not applicable ". Parks and Recreation: No issues - less than one acre. Stormwater: Development Review Agenda - Thursday, March 6, 2008 - Page 11 DRC Action Agcnda L I The following sfll be addressed prior to Community Developmetoard. 1. Provide only one drainage calculation signed and sealed by the professional engineer reflecting the current design. Information submitted for this review contradicts with one another and came from two different parties. The drainage calculation that was done by Ahmed Nawab shows the site data different than the one done by Adel M. Blassy. Pond's cross sections on the current plan and the one done in 2004 are different. 2. Provide water quality calculation. 3. Provide a detailed stormwater narrative addressing existing and proposed conditions 4. Latest drainage calculation shows the total site area is 7720 sf , but only 5159sf contributes to the surface area runoff. Please delineate this information on the grading plan. 5. Please tie the pond outfall to the inlet nearby, not to the middle of the pipe. This outfall pipe shall be RCP and minimum of 15" in size. 6. Please show pond control structure and its detail. The following shall be addressed prior to building permit. 1. Provide an approved SWFWMD permit for the latest design. 2. Provide a 50' adjacent topography along with the finished floor elevations of adjacent structures and existing storm sewers. 3. Show on grading plan the location of the pond's cross - sections. Pond cross sections shall show all the designed water levels, seasonal high water table, water table, and bank slope of 4:1. General note: 1. DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. 2. At building permit application, applicant shall submit all information again for review Solid Waste: 1 , How will solid waste be handled will need dumpster and enclosure for size of project 2 -28 -2008 as agreed in FLD 2004 -02010 "That this site share the dumpster on the property to the east, through appropriate agreements with the City and the abutting property owner. This off -site dumpster shall be upgraded with appropriate building permits and be properly located and screened to meet City requirements prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for this site." Traffic Engineering: 1 . There shall be no objects in the sight triangle over the City's acceptable vertical height criteria. (City's Community Development Code, Section 3 -904). 2. Provide truncated domes where sidewalk crosses a driveway. 3. Change the the Florida Statute number to read 318.18. 4. Curb radius shall be 30'. 5. Driveway shall be 125' from the nearest intersection. Planning: The above to be addressed prior to a Community Development Board (CDB) hearing. General Note(s): 1) Applicant shall comply with the current Transportation Impact Fee Ordinance and fee schedule and paid prior to a Certificate of Occupancy (C.O.). 2) DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. Development Review Agenda - Thursday, March 6, 2008 - Page 12 DRC Action Agcnda 1.1 1 . 2/13/08 - WW • • Revise the visibility triangle at the intersection to be located along the property lines. 2/7/08 - WW Show on the civil site and landscape plans the sight visibility triangle at the intersection of N. Ft. Harrison Avenue and Marshall Street. 2. Index of Sheets on Sheet C1 /5 indicates a total of five sheets. However, a Demolition Plan has been added as Sheet C6/6. Revise for the following: a. Revise the Index of Sheets to add the Demolition Plan as Sheet C6/6; b. Renumber Sheets C1 /5 - C5/5 to reflect there are now six sheets, not five; and c. Number the Elevations as Sheet C3/6. 3 . Sheet 1/5 - Revise the Site Data for Proposed Impervious Surface Ratio from 0.63 to 0.625 (63% and 37.5% {open space] = 100.5 %, which is not possible). 4. Sheet 115 - Revise the Site Data for Required Parking from eight spaces to 14 spaces and revise the Parking Calculations to indicate 4 spaces per 1,000 sf and 3,400/1,000 = 3.4 x 4 = 14 spaces. The Parking Demand Study should be providing the justification for a parking reduction. 5 . Since the property is legally described as one lot plus half of the abutting vacated alley, the following will be included as a condition of approval by the CDB: That, prior to the issuance of any permits, a Declaration of Unity of Title be recorded in the public records; 6. Sheet C3/6 - a. Provide a height dimension from existing grade to top of roof (Sheet C1 /5 indicates such dimension is 20.58 feet); and b. Revise the height of the decorative tower to be measured from existing grade (not FFE) to top of tower. 7. Sheet C1 /5 - Revise Site Data for Proposed Bldg Height to reflect height from existing grade to top of roof (not from FFE), revise the height for the top of parapet, as it is taller than indicated (since a new facade on the east side of the north elevation is being constructed [indicated at 24' -6 ", but needs to be measured from existing grade to top of this new parapet and not FFE]). 8 . Request needs to include a building height increase for a decorative tower from 25 feet to xx feet (see other comments about providing the height of the tower from existing grade to top of tower). Request also needs to provide a justification for such increase. 9. Remove from Sheets C2/5, C4/5 and C5/5 the Index of Sheets (only necessary on Sheet Cl /6). 10. Sheet C2/5 - If the western property line length is 50.81 feet and parking spaces are nine feet wide, unclear why there is only a three -foot dimension indicated from the north property line to the edge of pavement. Five parking spaces @ nine feet wide each = 45 feet. 50.81 - 45 feet = 5.81 feet. There is some triangulation of the property as the east property line is 50.17 feet, so the dimension from the north property line to the edge of pavement at the western edge of the western parking row should be slightly less than 5.81 feet (not three feet). Likewise, check the dimension from the north property line to the edge of pavement for the eastern parking row to ensure it is six feet. 11 . Sheets C2/5 & C5/5 - Need to properly show any proposed freestanding /monument signage, which should be coordinated with proposed landscaping. There is also a statement near the center top of Sheet C2/5 "Monument Type 6' High Sign" that doesn't relate to anything on the plan. Revise. 12. Sheet C2/5 - Note #7 - What is meant by "similar nature usage "? 13. Sheet C2/5 - Unclear if the sidewalk in front of the handicap space is flush with the pavement or raised six inches above with a ramp? Show ramp location. 14. Based on the floor plans on Sheet C3/5, is this one two -story office space or two offices in a two -story building (one office unit on the first floor and one office unit on the second floor)? Development Review Agenda - Thursday, March 6, 2008 - Page 13 DRC Action Ag.Wd 1.1 15 . I am confused. Atedata on Sheet C1 /5 indicates there is 1700 squ f et existing and proposed on the first floor and 1700 square feet on the second floor. Need to accurately provide the EXISTING and the PROPOSED floor area for each floor. a. It is recommended to calculate gross floor area according to the Code definition. b. Sheet C3/5 indicates the office on the first floor to be 1680 square feet. Is this existing or proposed, seeing there is a small addition to make a closet on the north side of the building near the entrance? c. Sheet C3/5 indicates the office on the second floor to be 760 square feet and 1000 square feet storage. This adds up to 1760 square feet (not 1700). This is extremely important to provide accurate information because parking calculations are based on this information. 16. Per Section 3 -911, any on -site overhead utility lines must be placed underground with this proposal. Provide note that such will be done as part of the construction. 17 . Sheet C3/6 - On the proposed north facade elevation, there should be a vertical line indicating the edge of a wall corner on the ground floor under the decorative tower (see floor plan above the elevation). Show this vertical line. 18. Sheet C3/6 (colored elevations) - To be consistent with the north and east facades, indicate a tan area along the bottom of the west facade south of the tower to the south building line. 19. Page 1 of the application - a. Provide the "Legal Description" on the form or state "See attached" and then attach the legal description. b. Revise the "Description of Request" to state "See attached ". 20. Sheet C3/6 - North and West elevations should show the location of any attached signage on the building (at least "SIGN "), if any are anticipated, so signage can be coordinated with the exterior building design. 21 . Exhibit A - Description of Request - a. Unclear of what is meant on the third line by "miscellaneous uses on the second floor ". The Code does not have such "miscellaneous use" listed in the Commercial District. Be more specific as the the proposed use of the second floor with a use listed in the Commercial District. b. Revise to match what I have written so that it is all inclusive. 22. Exhibit A - Include a title above Paragraph 1 stating 'Responses to General Applicability Criteria ". 23 . Exhibit A - Response to General Applicability Criteria #1 - Describe the surrounding commercial uses that you are indicating this proposal is consistent with and the character of the surrounding area. 24. Exhibit A - Response to General Applicability Criteria #2 - Do not answer the criteria with the criteria language. Provide a response as to HOW the proposal will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent properties and buildings or significantly impair the value of the adjacent properties. Be specific as to the surrounding uses and the surrounding property values. 25 . Exhibit A - Response to General Applicability Criteria #3 - Unclear as to what is meant by the last sentence. Be specific, not vague. 26. Exhibit A - Response to General Applicability Criteria #4 - Response is insufficient. HOW are traffic impacts being improved (suggestion: parking that backs out into Marshall Street is being removed and replaced with a parking lot meeting Code requirements). Might also mention how pedestrian and vehicular conflicts will be improved by removal of the backout parking. 27. Exhibit A - Response to General Applicability Criteria #5 - Response is inadequate. HOW is the proposal compatible and consistent with the surrounding uses. Be specific. 28. Exhibit A - Applicable Flexibility Criteria - Remove as this is being processed as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project. The justification to the reductions to setbacks and parking must be addressed through the Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria. Development Review Agenda - Thursday, March 6, 2008 - Page 14 DRC Action Agenda 1.1 29 . Last page of narrative - • a. First paragraph - The subject property is not located in the Downtown District, which is approximately 2000 feet to the south, so it is unclear how this project is fulfilling redevelopment of downtown. Also, unclear as to reference to Garden Avenue as a walkable commercial district. Unclear as to need for this paragraph. b. Second paragraph - Again, this property is not located in the Downtown District and not within the Downtown area, so there are no applicable downtown guidelines for this project. Unclear as to need for this paragraph. c. Sixth paragraph - Unclear, if this is proposed to be office uses, what products /services are being displayed to pedestrians that are approximately 20 feet from the building. d. Seventh paragraph - Since this is an existing building and not a proposed building, unclear what is meant by "the placement of the building ". Also, since this building is located on and is oriented toward Marshall Street primarily and N. Ft. Harrison Avenue secondarily, unclear how this building's placement creates "a presence on Garden Avenue" (for which it has no frontage on). Unclear as to any creation of a pedestrian friendly walkway. e. Last paragraph - Unclear as to what is meant by being an addition to "the entry" to the City's downtown.. 30. Response to Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria #1 - Reponse is inadequate. Explain in detail HOW the redevelopment of this parcel is impractical without deviations to setbacks, parking, buffers and height. 31 . Response to Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria #2 - Response is inadequate. Explain in detail HOW the proposal complies with this criteria. 32 . Response to Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria #3 - Response is inadequate. Explain in detail HOW is this project-compatible with the surrounding properties. Explain in detail HOW the reductions to setbacks, buffers and parking will not impede improvement of surrounding properties or set an unnecessary precedent for not meeting Code requirements, especially parking requirements. 33 . Response to Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria #4 - Response provided does not address the criteria. Additionally, the existing building is two story; this is not a proposed building that is being designed. 34 . Response to Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria #5 - Provide an appropriate response to this criteria, most likely objectives a, b and c. 35 . Response to Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria #6 - Provide a detailed, specific response that addresses ALL of the objectives of this criteria, based on all the setback, buffer and parking reductions and a height increase for the decorative tower. 36. Code requires in Section 3- 1406.13.2 a minimum stacking distance of 20 feet from the front property line on Marshall Street to the first parking space. Indicated is three feet. Any reduction to this stacking length requirement must be supported by a traffic study. Either meet the required stacking length or provide a traffic study specifically relating to this requirement that justifies the reduction. 37 . Parking Demand Study - Introduction: a. First paragraph - There are not two two -story existing buildings on site. The existing duplex is one -story in height. b. Second paragraph - You characterize the remodeling to the exterior of the building as "minor facade changes ". Based on the elevations submitted, I would not so characterize these changes as "minor," especially in light of the decorative tower being proposed. c. Fourth paragraph - The minimum required parking for offices is four spaces per 1,000 square feet, not three. Table 2 -704 provides for an acceptable range of between three and four spaces per 1,000 square feet. Parking calculations must start with four spaces per 1,000 square feet. Building square footage amounts are inconsistent throughout this proposal. Need to accurately calculate the Gross Floor Area for this building (floors one and two) in order to use such in the parking calculations. At 3,400 square feet of building GFA and four spaces per 1,000 square feet, 14 parking spaces are required. Only nine parking spaces are being provided, at a ratio of 2.64 spaces per 1,000 square feet (based on 3,400 square feet of GFA). d. Fifth paragraph - Totally unclear what this is and how it relates to the Parking Demand Study. Remove this paragraph. Development Review Agenda - Thursday, March 6, 2008 - Page 15 DRC Action Agenda I.1 38 . Parking Demand Stud - Methodology: a. As I noted in my email to Hashim on October 26, 2007, in response to a draft Parking Demand Study, I noted that the October 23, 2007, meeting was with Wayne Wells alone and that a scoping meeting was also necessary with Traffic Engineering. Unclear is such meeting ever occurred. b. We never agreed to a methodology of using ITE Trip Generation rates as a basis for a Parking Demand Study. As I noted in my email to Hashim on October 26, 2007, in response to a draft Parking Demand Study for "retail sales" on both floors (one user in the entire building) "I have talked to Himanshu Patni in Traffic Engineering and we both agree that the basis for determining parking demand is not a direct correlation to Trip Generation by particular uses. It may be used to assist in explaining certain characteristics of parking demand, but not the basis for determining parking demand. I possibly thought that part of your basis would be that the second floor would be used exclusively for storage of products for the first floor." There has been no meeting to discuss the development of a methodology for a Parking Demand Study for "office" uses in this building. 39. Parking Demand Study - Discussion and Conclusion - Based on the comments on the Introduction and Methodology sections, the numbers of required parking spaces and the reduction required from 14 to nine spaces is incorrectly portrayed. The conclusion is inaccurate and cannot be supported by the Planning Department. 40. Parking Demand Study - Exhibits C and D - Totally unclear what these relate to and why they are included. The Study does not reference Exhibits C and D at all. Exhibits C and D review parking observations at a retail center in a totally different part of town on two different days. This was never discussed with Wayne Wells. Other: No Comments Notes: This application is insufficient to move forward to the CDB. Revise application material and resubmit one original and 14 copies for additional DRC review. Development Review Agenda - Thursday, March 6, 2008 - Page 16 DRC Action AgaWa 1.1 a Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2008 11:39 AM To: Glenn, Tom Subject: FLD2008- 02005, 503 Marshall Street • Tom - For the above referenced case on the March 6, 2008, DRC agenda, you have made the following comment: "How will solid waste be handled will need dumpster and enclosure for size of project". This case was originally approved under FLD2004 -02010 when it was going to be retail sales in the two -story building. Hashim also owns the convenience store to the east of this property. Case FLD2004 -02010 was approved with the following condition: "That this site share the dumpster on the property to the east, through appropriate agreements with the City and the abutting property owner. This off -site dumpster shall be upgraded with appropriate building permits and be properly located and screened to meet City requirements prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for this site." Now they are proposing office uses (either one office using both floors or two office units, one on the first floor and one on the second floor. The applicant is proposing to use the dumpster next door similar to how it was approved previously under FLD2004- 02010. Will this work again? If so, could you revise your comment appropriately for this case? I am wanting to send out comments.tomorrow (Friday) afternoon. Thanks. Wayne M. Wells, AICP Planner III City of Clearwater 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, FL 33756 -5520 Phone: 727 - 562 -4504 Fax: 727 - 562 -4865 Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Friday, October 26, 2007 6:08 PM To: 'HSullaiman @aol.com' Cc: Thompson, Neil; Patni, Himanshu Subject: Parking Demand Study, 503 Marshall Street Hashim - I have reviewed the draft Parking Demand Study for your property at 503 Marshall Street and have the following comments: 1. Introduction - First Paragraph - The property is located at the southeast corner of N. Ft. Harrison Avenue and Marshall Street (not the northeast corner). 2. Introduction - First Paragraph - Check the square footage of the existing two -story building. I don't recollect it being 1710 square feet GFA, but maybe 1710 for only the first floor. 3. Introduction - First Paragraph - There is an existing duplex, not a house, on the west side of the property to be demolished. 4. Introduction - Second Paragraph - Need to state the square footage of the second floor. The use of the second floor is for accessory storage for the first floor use of retail sales. 5. Introduction - Fourth Paragraph - The proposed use of the building is for retail sales and services. Parking calculations have only been done for the first floor. Need to calculate for both floors. 6. Introduction - Fifth Paragraph - Unclear why this paragraph is necessary. This might be good for the Flexible Development application narrative, but has no bearing on the Parking Demand Study. 7. Methodology - First Paragraph - The meeting on October 23, 2007, was with me. I believe I told you a scoping meeting to discuss the methodology for conducting or preparing the Parking Demand Study also must occur with Traffic Engineering, which has not occurred. 8. Methodology - First Paragraph - I have talked to Himanshu Patni in Traffic Engineering and we both agree that the basis for determining parking demand is not a direct correlation to Trip Generation by particular uses. It may be used to assist in explaining certain characteristics of parking demand, but not the basis for determining parking demand. I possibly thought that part of your basis would be that the second floor would be used exclusively for storage of products for the first floor. 9. Methodology - Second Paragraph - I am unclear why the proposed user of the retail sales is unknown, as you have told me for a long time that it is beauty supplies. Likewise, unclear why the proposed hours of operation are unknown. 10. Discussion - Need to address both floors in any calculations or discussion, for both any prior use and the proposed use. 11. Conclusion - First Paragraph - The methodology and discussion has been about the number of trips being generated, which does not correlated to the number of parking spaces required for a particular use. This Study must justify the requested parking reduction from X number of spaces to Y number of spaces. 12. Conclusion - Second Paragraph - Unclear of the need for this paragraph. There must be excess parking spaces (more existing spaces than required spaces, which means parking calculations must be done for the adjacent business) at the adjacent business in order to enter into a cross - parking agreement. However, if there was excess parking spaces on an adjacent business where a cross- parking agreement could be agreed upon, these spaces being used on the adjacent business could be counted as part of meeting the parking requirements for this property. Since this discussion seems unknown, recommend removing this paragraph. Wayne *ww.sunbiz.org - Departmenjo State . Page 1 of 2 Home Contact Us E-Filing Services Document Searches Pre_v._ious_ on . _List Next-an List. Return_To_List. No Events No Name History -wetail by Entity Namer Florida Prafit Corporation 1504 GARDEN INC Filing Information Document Number P01000085713 FEI Number 752991763 Date Filed 08/28/2001 State FL Status ACTIVE Principal Address 1504 N GARDEN AVE CLEARWATER FL 33755 Mailing Address 1504 N GARDEN AVE CLEARWATER FL 33755 Registered Agent Name & Address SULLAIMAN, HASHIM 1504 N. GARDEN AVE. CLEARWATER FL 33755 US Name Changed: 04/28/2003 Address Changed: 04/28/2003 Officer /Director Detail Name & Address Title DPST SULLAIMAN, HASHIM 1504 N GARDEN AVE CLEARWATER FL 33755 Title V AVOSE, SULLAIMAN 1504 N GARDEN AVE CLEARWATER FL 33755 i Forms H ._ rttjty N� http: / /www. sunbiz. org/ scripts /cordet. exe? action= DETFIL &inq_doc_ number= P01000085 71.:. 2/7/2008 . , ww.sunbiz.org - Departme 4 State Annual Reports Report Year Filed Date 2005 04/25/2005 2006 04/26/2006 2007 04/27/2007 Document Images .0.412. 7/2007 -- ANNUAL REPORT 04/26/2006 -- ANNUAL REPORT 04/2.5/2005... -- AN_N_UAL REPORT �t3 PDI� 03/24/2004 =:= ANNUAL REPORT Vlew�nage rt'1 =` 04/28/2003 -- ANNUAL REPORT 7"j 03/18/2002 -- ANNUAL REPORT Previous on List Next on List Return To List No Events No Name History • Home Contact us Document Searches E- Filing Services Forms Help Copyright and Privacy Policies Copyright @ 2007 State of Florida, Department of State. Page 2 of 2 http://www.sunbiz.org/scripts/cordet.exe?action=DETFIL,&inq_doc number--P01000085 71... 2/7/2008 !' PiAllas County Property Ap er Information: 09 29 15 55530 000 0 Page 2 of 6 ' 0 09 / 29 / 15 / 55530 / 000 / 0100 07- Feb -2008 Jim Smith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 10:53:48 Ownership Information Non - Residential Property Address, Use, and Sales 1504 GARDEN INC OBK: 11741 OPG: 1534 1504 N GARDEN AUE CLEARWATER FL 33755 -2432 EVAC: Nan -EUAC Comparable sales value as Prop Addr: 1505 N FT HARRISON AUE of Jan 1, 2007, based on Census Tract: 261.00 sales from 2005 - 2006: 0 Sale Date OR Book /Page Price (Qual /UnQ) Vac /Imp Plat Information 12/2,001 11,741 }1,534 375,000 (M) I 1911: Book OH7 Pgs 017- 7 /1,997 9,767} 285 77,500 (U) I 0000: Book Pgs - 1 /1,996 9,231 {1,291 125,000 (U) I 0000: Book Pgs - 11/1,984 5,871} 770 145,400 (Q) I 2007 Value EXEMPTIONS Just /Market: 262,000 Homestead: NO Ownership % .000 Govt Exem: NO Use .000 Assessed /Cap: 262,000 Institutional Exem: NO Tax Exempt: .000 Historic Exem: 0 Taxable: 262,000 Agricultural: 0 2007 Tax Information District: Cu Seawall: Frontage: Clearwater View: 07 Tax: 5,223.52 Land Size Unit Land Land Land Front x Depth Price Units Meth 07 Millage: 19.9371 1) 50 x 155 14.00 7,750.00 S 07 Spec Asmt: .00 2) 0 x 0 .00 .00 3) 0 x 0 .00 .00 Without the Save -Our -Homes 4) 0 x 0 .00 .00 cap, 2007 taxes will be 5) 0 x 0 .00 .00 5,223.52 6) 0 x 0 .00 .00 Without any exemptions, 2007 taxes will be 5,223. 52 Short Legal MARSHALL'S, E.A. SUB LOT 10 & W 1 {2 OF UAC Description ALLEY ON E Building Information http:H 136 .174.187.131htbinlcgi- scr3 ?o =1 &a =1 &b =1 &c =1 &r= .16 &s= 4 &t3 =1 &u= 0 &p= 09 +... 2/7/2008 Pid --Has County Property Ap r Information: 09 29.15 55530 000 0� Page 3 of 6 Pro ert and Land Use Code descriptions. • Building 1 • Building_ 2 Building #1 09 / 29 1 15 / 55530 040 / 01+00 :01 07- Feb -2008 Jim Smith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 10:53:48 Commercial Card 01 of 2 Improvement Type: Duplex/Triplex Property Address: 1505 N FT HARRISON AUE Prop Use: 330 Land Use: 17 Structural E1�m��-�.t Foundation Continuous Footing Floor System Wood WJ Subfloor Exterior Wall Frame Stucco Height Factor 0 Party Wall None Structural Frame None Roof Frame Gable & Hip Roof Cover Composition Shingle Cabinet & Mill Average Floor Finish Carpet Combination Interior Finish Drywall Total Units 0 Heating & Air Heating &Cooling Pckg Fixtures 4 Bath Tile None Units Electric Average Area Shape Factor Rectangle 1. 00 Quality Average 7) Year Built 1,906 Effective Age 40 Other Depreciation 0 Function Depreciation 0 Economic Depreciation 0 Sub Aromas Description Factor Area Units Description Factor Area 1) Base Area 1. 00 1,880 7) . 00 0 2) .00 0 8) .00 0 3) .00 0 9) .00 0 4) .00 0 10) _ .00 0 5) :00 0 11) .00 0 6) .00 0 12) .00 0 Commcrclal E3,ctra F(--aturos s Building #2 http:// 136 .174.187.131htbinlcgi- scr3 ?o =1 &a =1 &b =l &c =1 &r= .16 &s= 4 &t3 =1 &u= 0 &p= 09 +... 2/7/2008 Description Dimensions Price Units Value RCD Year 1) PATIOIDECK 1600 SF 6.00 . 1,600 9,600 3,840 1,945 2) FENCE 45LF 8.00 45 360 170 1,985 3) .00 0 0 0 0 4) .00 0 0 0 0 5) .00 0 0 0 0 6) .00 0 0 0 0 TOTAL RECORD VALUE: 4,010 Building #2 http:// 136 .174.187.131htbinlcgi- scr3 ?o =1 &a =1 &b =l &c =1 &r= .16 &s= 4 &t3 =1 &u= 0 &p= 09 +... 2/7/2008 0 Pinillas County Property Ap r Information: 09 29 15 55530 000 016 Page 4 of 6 09 / 29 / 15 / 55530 / 000 / 0100 :0 07- Feb -2008 Jim Smith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 10:53:48 Commercial Card 02 of 2 Improvement Type: Offices Property Address: 503 MARSHALL ST Prop Use: 330 Land Use: 17 Strut -tural Elements Foundation Continuous Footing Floor System Slab on Grade Exterior Wall Concrete Block Height Factor 0 Party Wall Hone Structural Frame Masonry Pillar &Steel Roof Frame Bar Joist /Rigid Fram Roof Cover Built Up /Metal /Gyps Cabinet & Mill Hone Floor Finish Carpet Combination Interior Finish Drywall Total Units 0 Heating & Air Heating &Cooling Pckg Fixtures 2 Bath Tile Hone Area Electric Average Description Factor Shape Factor Rectangle 1) Quality Average 1. 00 Year Built 1,965 Effective Age 35 Other Depreciation 10 Function Depreciation 0 Economic Depreciation 0 Sub Aromas Gommc-_rcial Extra FsaturE3s Description Dimensions Description Factor Area Year Description Factor Area 1) Base Area 1. 00 1.743 7) . 00 0 2) Canopy .25 57 8) .00 0 3) Upper Stry Base Area .90 1'800 9) .00 0 4) 0 . 00 0 10) . 00 0 5) .00 0 11) .00 0 6) .00 0 12) . 00 0 Gommc-_rcial Extra FsaturE3s Description Dimensions Price Units Value RCD Year 1) ASPHALT 1200 SF 1.75 11200 2,100_ 21100 0 2) .00 0 0 0 0 3) .00 0 0 0 0 4) .00 0 0 0 0 5) . 00 0 0 ., 0 0 6) .00 0 0 0 0 TOTAL RECORD VALUE: 2,100 Map With Property Address (non- vacant) ®®®® M FIE� http: // 136 .174.187.13 /htbin/cgi- scr3 ?o =1 &a =1 &b =1 &c =1 &r= .16 &s= 4 &t3 =1 &u= 0 &p= 09 +... 2/7/2008 =' Pingllas County Property Ap *r Information: 09 29 15 55530 000 046 300 tRSHALL S7. HO E Jk I: i ' 140 2 _� d tr HAPPISON GA DEN c- 1/8 Mile Aerial Photograph (2002) Page 5 of 6 MARSHA MIA http:H 136 .174.187.131htbinlcgi- scr3 ?o =1 &a =1 &b =1 &c =1 &r= .16 &s= 4 &t3 =1 &u= 0 &p= 09 +... 2/7/2008 i 52 i Mfr 60� r'a3 AVE DP MINN KAYPTI F MARSHA MIA http:H 136 .174.187.131htbinlcgi- scr3 ?o =1 &a =1 &b =1 &c =1 &r= .16 &s= 4 &t3 =1 &u= 0 &p= 09 +... 2/7/2008 Pinellas Count- ?- Operty Ap r Information: 09 29 15 55530 000 Q Page 6 of 6 Pinellas County Property Appraiser Parcel Information Back to Search Page An explanation o= this screen zttp:// 136. 174. 187. 13/ ?ztbin /cgi- scr3 ?o= 1 &a-- l&b= 1 &c= 1 &r=.- 6 &s=4 &t =1 &u= 0&r-=09 +... 2/7/2008 A ' FLD2008- 02005; 95 t 1504 GARDEN INC .40 0 1504 N GARDEN AVE ANDERSON, EDWARD H CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 2432 604 MARSHALL ST CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 2531 ASHLEY, EMILY EPSTEIN, MATHEW 609 S PROSPECT AVE CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5627 BOOMER & DADS PROPERTIES LLC 1204 W ESTLEY ST SAFETY HARBOR FL 34695 - 2709 BRITT, LEE 1621 N MYRTLE AVE CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 2559 BURNEY, MILDRED 1749 JADE AVE CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 1933 BAYVIEW HEIGHTS ASSOCIATION 625 MINNESOTA DRIVE CLEARWATER, FL 33755 BORTKO, WILLIAM E UNIT 201 612 WELLS CT CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5313 BROOKS, HASTINGS 610 MINNESOTA DR CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 2539 CAHALL, CHARLES V 6520 126TH AVE LARGO FL 33773 - 1834 ARAYA, HENRY E 1467 HAGEN AVE DUNEDIN FL 34698 - 2219 BLUNT, ODELL G SR BLUNT, ODELL E JR EST 1020 APACHE TRL CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 1801 BRASWELL, LAUREL E 1609 N MYRTLE AVE CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 2550 BRUWER, JENNIFER 1601 SUNSET DR CLEARWATER FL 33755 -2459 CASALE,ANN THE IPPOLITO, ILARA THE 1200 GULF BLVD # 1404 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 3700 CLARK, - RICHARD L CLEARWATER NEIGHBORHOODS CLEARWATER RES TRUST 1402 N GARDEN AVE COALITON FICKEN, JAMES R THE CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 2473 SHELLEY KUROGHLIAN PRESIDENT 1608 N OSCEOLA AVE 1821 SPRINGWOOD CIR S CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 2447 CLEAWTATER, FL 33763 COEUR DE LION INC PO BOX 1564 LARGO FL 33779 - 1 564 CONNORS- COOPER, CARRIE L 19014 SANDIA PINES HUMBLE TX 77346 - 3118 DEUTSCHE BANK NATL TRUST CO 1270 NORTHLAND DR STE 200 MENDOTA HEIGHTS MN 55120 - 1176 COMMUNITY LEARNING CENTER INC 1611 N FT HARRISON AVE CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 2425 CRUZ, EDWARD P CRUZ, NINA M 1401 N OSCEOLA AVE CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 2444 EVERYBODY'S TABERNACLE INC 1120 N BETTY LN CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3303 CONNORS, CARRIE L 19014 SAN DIA PINES DR HUMBLE TX 77346 - 3118 DANIELS, JOHNNY L EST 1405 N GARDEN AVE CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 2431 EWART HOLDINGS INC P O BOX 747 LARGO FL 33779 - 0747 FRANKLIN, LINDA GAIL GAIK, ARDEN J GLASSMAN, HOWARD 1500 N OSCEOLA AVE 1603 SUNSET DR 18641 SILVER MAPLE WAY CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 2445 CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 2459 SANTA ANA CA 92705 - 2144 { J • GUIDI, HAZEL M THE HALL, VICKIE A 1503 SUNSET DR 1612 OSCEOLA AVE N CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 2457 CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 2447 HARRIS, CHARLIE THE 1417 PINEBROOK DR CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3439 HUDSON,CHERYL MILLER, JOSEPH 610 MARSHALL ST CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 2531 JACKSON, JOHNNY S JR JACKSON, MARIAN J 609 MINNESOTA DR CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 2540 LAMBERT, MALVIN H 1271 WOODLAWN TER CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 1154 MAAS, TODD T 334 E LAKE RD # 301 PALM HARBOR FL 34685 - 2427 MOUNTENAY, JOAN L PO BOX 6523 CLEARWATER FL 33758 - 6523 OKUBOYE, DEJI O 600 N OSCEOLA AVE CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3838 P F M INVESTMENTS LLC 4644 W GANDY BLVD STE 4 -411 TAMPA FL 33611 - 3300 HARRIS, MARY J 609 MARSHALL ST CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 2532 HUDSON, JAMES W 1412 N OSCEOLA AVE CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 2443 JOHNSON, SHAWN L 619 MINNESOTA DR CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 2540 LARKIN, NEDRA K H 602 MARSHALL ST CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 2531 MC KINNEY, LEROY MC KINNEY, HENRY T 607 MARSHALL ST CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 2532 NATHAN, DELORES 608 MARSHALL ST CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 2531 OLD CLERWATER BAY NEIGHBORHOODS ASSOCIATION SIOUXIE BOSHOFF PRESIDENT 113 SUNBURST CT CLEARWATER, FL 33755 PARLOR, KATHLEEN PARLOR, GREGORY D 1415 SUNSET DR - CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 2454 HARDING, MAURICE L 515 N LINCOLN AVE CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 4733 HERITAGE CONDO ASSN INC 2905 W BAY DR LARGO FL 33770 - 2621 IRLE, WILLIAM A 1402 N FT HARRISON AVE CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 2420 LADD, MICHELLE E 1089 GLENWOOD DR DUNEDIN FL 34698 - 6516 LUHRSEN, TRACY JO PADHYA,TAPAN 2902 W BAY VISTA AVE TAMPA FL 33611 - 1610 MERRITT, LAWRENCE S MERRITT, CAROLE W 9002 SILVERTHORN RD LARGO FL 33777 - 3157 NORTH GREENWOOD COMMUNITY COALITION, INC. MAURICE MICKENS JOHNATHAN WADE CO- CHAIRS 1402 N MARTIN LUTHER KING JR AVE CLEAWATER, FL 33755 OLSEN, TOD OLSEN, DENISE T 1609 N FORT HARRISON AVE CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 2425 PAULTRE, FRANTZ G LIANG - PAULTRE, YU HSIANG 1308 VERMONT AVE TARPON SPRINGS FL 34689 - 3878 PEARSON, DAVID H PERSECHINO, FRANK PHAM, AN PEARSON, DANIEL A TEIXEIRA, LINA DAM, MINH 1625 N FORT HARRISON AVE 902 S MARTIN L KING JR AVE 341 RISHNELL DR CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 2425 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 4048 OAKLAND CA 94619 - 2335 1 v < Y POOK, PEACHES QURESHI, ZAHID REDHEAD RENOVATIONS INC 234 DOLPHIN PT # 1 APT 1 670 ISLAND WAY # 1002 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2110 1840 N GRAMERCY PL CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1979 LOS ANGELES CA 90028 - 5773 RELIGIOUS COMNTY SVC INC ROBLYER, JOSEPH A ROSADO, WILLY P 503 S M L KING JR AVE ROBLYER, PAULA T ROSADO, MARIELA P CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 1611 N OSCEOLA AVE 1417 N OSCEOLA AVE CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 2448 CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 2444 ROY, ZAHID N ROY- RAJARAM, DAVID SAGE RYAN REALTY INC 1412 N FORT HARRISON AVE 7712 BINGHAM CT 1401 MYRTLE AVE CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 2462 TAMPA FL 33625 - 2417 CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 2546 SANDERS, HILLARD SCHOENHERR, ALEX SCHOENHERR, KARIN 608 MINNESOTA DR SCHOENHERR, RUTH 1407 SUNSET DR # A CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 2539 1402 SUNSET DR CLEARWATER FL 33755 - CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 2453 SHAW, GLEN A SOUTHARD FAMILY TRUST STICKLER, SARA L 1615 N OSCEOLA AVE 401 VISTA CT QUEEN, JOHN -BEAU CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 2448 BENICIA CA 94510 - 2715 PO BOX 165 OAK HILL NY 12460 - 0165 SZABO, ELIZABETH S TREMMEL, JAMES H TREMMEL, JAMES H 1603 N OSCEOLA AVE 1411 N OSCEOLA AVE 5156 CYRIL DR CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 2448 CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 2444 DADE CITY FL 33523 - 9137 TROISI, DANIEL J TROISI, MARY 1605 N FORT HARRISON AVE CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 2425 U S BANK NATL ASSN THE 1 MERIDIAN XING STE 100 MINNEAPOLIS MN 55423 - TROISI, ROBERT A 1610 N FT HARRISON AVE CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 2415 USA FED NATL MTG ASSN 950 E PACES FERRY RD ATLANTA GA 30326 - TUCKER - ALLEN, ROBIN PO BOX 1952 CLEARWATER FL 33757 - 1952 VINCA, SELIM 1450 MARJOHN AVE CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 2431 VIVERETTE, KIMBERLY S WALTERS, ROBERT JR WHITNEY, ROBERT SR 1501 OSCEOLA AVE N 615 MINNESOTA DR WHITNEY, CRESCENSA CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 2446 CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 2540 6628 DEL PRADO TER NEW PORT RICHEY FL 34652 - 1504 WILLIAMS, EMILY RAE WILLIAMS, ROBERT S WOLFE, GERALD BENNETT 1611 SUNSET DR PLASKA, JACQUELYN K WOLFE, MARY LYNNE CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 2459 1706 CYPRESS AVE 11398 16TH PL NE BELLEAIR FL 33756 - ST MICHAEL MN 55376 - 3101 v ,.t ,III 0 WORLD LITERACY CRUSADE PIN ZELLNER, MARY J CTY 1304 PARKWOOD ST 1611 N FT HARRISON AVE CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 2730 CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 2425 PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER POST OFFICE Box 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758 -4748 MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562 -4567 FAX (727) 562 -4865 April 21, 2010 Hashim Sulliaman 1504 Garden Inc. 1504 N. Garden Avenue Clearwater, FL 33755 RE: Development Order — Case No. FLD2008 -02005 503 Marshall Street Dear Mr. Sulliaman: This letter constitutes a Development Order pursuant to Section 4- 206.D.6 of the Community Development Code. On April 20, 2010, the Community Development Board reviewed your Flexible Development application to permit a Mixed Use (1,610 square feet of Retail Sales and Services on the first floor and one Attached Dwelling on the second floor) in the Commercial (C) District with a lot area of 7,720 square feet, a lot width of 50.81 feet along N. Ft. Harrison Avenue (west) and 149.95 feet along Marshall Street (north), a front (west) setback of 14.6 feet (to pavement), a front (north) setback of 18 feet (to building). eight feet (to sidewalk) and 4.96 feet (to pavement), a side (east) setback of 0.4 feet (to existing building) and 12.93 feet (to pavement), a side (south) setback of one -foot (to existing building) and zero feet (to pavement), a building height of 31 feet (to top of decorative tower) and 10 parking spaces, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project under the provisions of Community Development Code (CDC) Section 2- 704.C; as well as a north landscape buffer width along Marshall Street of 4.96 feet (to pavement), an east landscape buffer width of 0.4 feet (to existing building), a south landscape buffer width of zero feet (to pavement) and a north foundation landscape width of four feet, as a Comprehensive Landscape Program under the provisions of CDC Section 3- 1202.G. The Community Development Board (CDB) APPROVED the application with the following Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and Conditions of Approval: Findings of Fact: 1. The 0.18 acres located at the southeast corner of North Ft. Harrison Avenue and Marshall Street; 2. The subject property is currently developed with a two -story commercial building (presently vacant) on the eastern portion of the site and an attached dwelling building (duplex — presently vacant) on the western portion of the site; 3. The only existing parking area for this site is north of the two -story commercial building, which requires vehicles to back into Marshall Street; 4. Code Compliance issues were initiated for this site on February 5, 2003, when a Stop Work Order was issued for unpermitted demolition and construction within the two -story commercial building (CDC2003- 00559, which is still an active case); To uAI. F,MPI,nYMRNT ANn AFFIRMATNF ACTION EMPLnYFR" April 21, 2010 Sullaiman — Page 2 5. On January 18, 2005, the Community Development Board (CDB) approved Case FLD2004 -02010 with nine conditions of approval for the subject property, permitting retail sales and service uses on both floors of this commercial building and included 11 required parking spaces on the parcel directly south of this site at 1411 N. Ft. Harrison Avenue; 6. Building Permit BCP2005 -06914 was submitted June 25, 2005, to facilitate the remodeling of the building and to construct the site improvements, but this permit was never issued and was voided October 24, 2006; 7. The applicant also lost the 11 required parking spaces on the adjacent parcel due to proposed redevelopment of that parcel (1411 N. Ft. Harrison Avenue); 8. This current application was filed February 4, 2008, in a second attempt to resolve the Code Compliance issue through the approval of an appropriate mix of use for the property; 9. The proposal is to demolish the duplex attached dwelling building on the west side of the site and permit, as a Mixed Use, a retail sales and service use of 1,610 square feet on the first floor and one attached dwelling on the second floor; 10. Many potential uses have been analyzed for this site, with the proposed mixed use the best fit for the site, which is part of the reason for the length of time this application has been in the development review process; 11. The proposal includes setback and perimeter buffer reductions from all property lines; 12. The proposal includes a front (west) setback of 14.6 feet (to pavement), a front (north) setback of 18 feet (to building), eight feet (to sidewalk) and 4.96 feet (to pavement), a side (east) setback of 0.4 feet (to existing building) and 12.93 feet (to pavement) and a side (south) setback of one -foot (to existing building) and zero feet (to pavement); 13. The existing building has a building height of 23.5 feet to the flat roof deck; 14. The proposal includes the construction of a decorative tower at an overall height of 31 feet over the entrance to the retail galas iIIeP to giyP the h,�ildir,g yiciial intF- Pgt; 15. Based on the proposed uses, 10 parking spaces are required and have been provided on -site; and 16. There is an active Code Compliance issue associated with this subject property for unpermitted remodeling of the two -story commercial building. Conclusions of Law: 1. That the development proposal is consistent with the Standards as per Tables 2 -701.1 and 2 -704 of the Community Development Code; 2. That the development proposal is consistent with the Flexibility criteria as per Section 2 -704.0 of the Community Development Code; and 3. That the development proposal is consistent with the General Standards for Level Two Approvals as per Section 3 -913 of the Community Development Code. Conditions of Approval: 1. That application for a building permit to construct the approved project be submitted no later than December 20, 2010. Failure to submit for these permits within this time frame shall cause this Flexible Development approval by the CDB to be null and void and cause compliance action to be initiated; 2. That, prior to the issuance of any permits, a Declaration of Unity of Title be approved and recorded in the public records; 3. That use of the building be for a retail sales and services use on the first floor and one attached dwelling on the second floor; X April 21, 2010 Sullaiman — Page 3 4. That the final design and color of the building be consistent with the elevations approved by the CDB; 5. That freestanding signage be limited to monument -style signs, be a maximum height of six feet and be consistent with the color and materials of the building; 6. That electric and communication lines on -site be placed underground; 7. That, prior to the issuance of any permits, appropriate agreements with the City and the abutting property owner be approved and recorded, as necessary, to allow tenants of this site to share the dumpster on the property to the east. Additionally, prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy /Completion for this site, the off -site dumpster shall be upgraded to meet City requirements for design and location; 8. That, prior to the issuance of the building permit, the location and visibility of electric equipment (electric panels, boxes and meters) be reviewed and, if located exterior to the building where visible from adjacent roadways or properties, be painted the same color as the building; 9. That, prior to the issuance of a building permit, outside mechanical equipment be reviewed for Code requirements for location and screening; and 10. That, prior to the issuance of any permit, all requirements of the General Engineering, Environmental Engineering, Stormwater Engineering, Traffic Engineering and Fire Departments be addressed. Pursuant to Section 4 -407, an application for a building permit shall be made according to the time frame listed under Condition of Approval #1 above (December 20, 2010). All required certificates of occupancy shall be obtained within two years of the date of issuance of the initial building permit. The building permit must be obtained within six months of the initial permit application. This timeframe to obtain the initial building permit may be extended for an additional six months for cause by the Community Development Coordinator. Time frames do not change with successive owners. The Community Development Coordinator may grant an extension of time for the Flexible Development approval for a period not to exceed one year and only within the original period of validity. The issuance of this Development Order does not relieve you of the necessity to obtain any building permits or pay any impact fees that may be required. In order to facilitate the issuance of any permit or license affected by this approval, please bring a copy of this letter with you when applying for any permits or licenses that require this prior development approval. Additionally, an appeal of a Level Two approval (Flexible Development) may be initiated pursuant to Section 4 -502.13 by the applicant or by any person granted party status within 14 days of the date of the CDB meeting. The filing of an application/notice of appeal shall stay the effect of the decision pending the final determination of the case. The appeal period for your case expires on May 5, 2010 (14 days from the date of the CDB meeting). If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Planner III, at 727 -562- 4504. You can access zoning information for parcels within the City through our website: wwW.iiiyclea.r\vater.com/go-\,,'dei?ts/l)laiitiixig. Sincerely, Michael Delk, AICP Planning and Development Director S:IPlanning DepartmenIICD BIFLEX (FLD)Unactive or Finished ApplicationsWarshall 503 Marshall Building (C) 2010.04 - Approved - WWIMarshal1503 Development Order 4.21.10.doc PARCEL 1: LOT 10 OF E.A. MARSHALL'S SUBDIVISION, ACCORDING TO THE MAP OR PLAT THEREOF AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 7, PAGE 17, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY, FLORIDA, OF WHICH PINELLAS COUNTY WAS FORMERLY A PART. F-IML THE NORTH 50.15 FT. OF THE WEST 5 FT. OF A CERTAIN VACATED 10 FOOT ALLEY RUNNING ALONG THE EAST LINE OF LOT 10 OF E.A. MARSHALL'S SUBDIVISION, ACCORDING TO MAP OR PLAT THEREOF AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 7, PAGE 17, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY, FLORIDA, OF WHICH PINELLAS COUNTY WAS FORMERLY A PART. F L 0 n 0 Z fN E I ritmo F 0 In' M AT I 0"N" %# w THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY APPEARS TO LIE WITHIN FLOOD ZONE C PER FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP 125096 0008 D MAP REVISED: 08/19/91 SURVEY INFORMATION PROVIDED BY A SIGNED & SEALED SURVEY BY: DAVID L. SMITH, PLS #5265 DATED: 03/13/08 SECTION , T�lIVNSHIP S, RANGE�9 E 44, J 4_11 ! SITE DA7A EXISTING (E) PROPOSED (P) REQUIRED C C C ZONING: 0 LAND USE: COMMERCIAL GENERAL COA4WRCML GENERAL COMMERCIAL GENERAL USAGE. • OFFICE & MULTIFAMILYRESIDENTIAL RETAIL GROUND FL ( ) Ln '4. ONE APARTMENT (2ND FL) � C �• 1 i . t_7 ...1 i 7,720 S.F. 7,720 S.F. 3,500 S.F. - LOTAREA: 0.18 ACRES 0.18 ACRES 10, 000 S.F. MIN. DENSITY 11 UNITS PER ACRE 7.352 UNITS PER ACRE 24 UNITS PER ACRE 0 3,669.7 S.F. - EX +58.S.E I... BUILDING COVERAGE: 3,622 S.F. 1,959 S.F. - DEMO - -- (S.E & % OF GROSS SITE) 46.92% 1,768 S.F. TO REMAIN GROSS FLOOR AREA (S.F.): 5,332 S.F. 1, 610 SF CO F.A.R.: 0.55MAX 0.69 0.20 cn W 99.3'- BLDG. WEST 99.3'- BLDG. WEST J FRONT: I8' - BLDG. NORTH 18'- BLDG. NORTH 25' 14'- PAVEMENT WEST 14'- PAVEMENT WEST SETBACKS: S' - PAVEMENT NORTH 0'- PAVEMENT NORTH SIDE: 0.2'- BLDG. EAST 0.2'- BLDG. EAST 10' MIN 0.95'- BLDG. SOUTH 0.95'- BLDG SOUTH 23'- TOP OF PARAPET 3P - TOP OF TOWER BLDG. HEIGHT. 20.58' - FLATROOF 23' 6" - FLATROOF 25' - -35' MAX. PAVED VEHICULAR USE AREA: (V. U.A) 1,533 S.F. 3,566.5 S.F. - -- IMPERVIOUS SURFACE RATIO: 5,630 S.F. (I.S.R.) 5,262 S.F. 0.729 0.95MAX. OPENSPACE: 2,458 S.F. 2,090 S.F. 5% MIN (S.F. & % OF GROSS SITE) 31.84% 27.0% PARKING LOT INTERIOR LANDSCAPING 300.43 S.F. (% OF V. U.A) NIA 8.4% NONE PARKING: 8 10 10 PARKING CAL CULAT(ONS.• 5 SPACES PER 1, 000 S.F. OF G.F.A. FOR RETAIL = 5x1, 610 /1, 000 =1.6 xS =8 SPACES 2 SPACES PER APARTMENT ON SECOND FLOOR =1 UNIT = 2 SPACES REQUESTED LANDSCAPE BUFFER REDUCTIONFOR PROVIDING PARKING. 9 FUb a100g0a0os 4:10V rt) EXIST. ELEVATION x EXIST. CONTOUR „ 10 NEW ELEVATION +10.00 NEW CONTOUR EXIST. STORM SEWER °° p NEW STORM SEWER ® ®® ®® NEW UNDERDRAIN ■s��s���s��s�����asns�■ EXIST. SAN. SEWER �� �_% w•� �•A �A..� � NEW SAN. SEWER' EXIST. WATER SERVICE ---------------- — NEW WATER SERVICE osssmmmmsmssmmumv NEW INLET NEW SAN. MANHOLE C.O. NEW CLEAN- OUT(C.O.) NEW BUILDING AREA- _;_:�.., ,- ;:x.. >` -,.�' .a 1 1. NEW ASPHALT x3;tPS33' Y'7jj '` NEW CONCRETE TEMP. SILT BARRIER POINT OF CONNECTION OF NEW UTILITY TO EXIST. M METER B.F.P.D. BACKFLOW PREVENTION DEVICE F.H.A. FIRE HYDRANT ASSEMBLY F.D.C. FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTION T.B.O. TEMPORARY BLOW -OFF T. &V. TAP AND VALVE SITE PLAN APPROVED CASE # )::i_DZ -00 f2z_00,r CASE TYPE DRC DATE 3�1�n ' 6 CDB DATE SIGNATURE IN&qw- 1A DATE U ' I� I--- � I I— -1-j- Nt .—I (_0 U (_p I 1 d- LJJ 0 � 0-) W m D 0100 z Q 0 Q0 n U 0 .. .. X Q =Q n I, Issue Date: 08/14109 Revisions: No. Date Description 01 21 10 COMMENTS mi 0 0 Ln '4. A � C �• 1 i . t_7 ...1 i � �....y 0 0 0 Uj U ' I� I--- � I I— -1-j- Nt .—I (_0 U (_p I 1 d- LJJ 0 � 0-) W m D 0100 z Q 0 Q0 n U 0 .. .. X Q =Q n I, Issue Date: 08/14109 Revisions: No. Date Description 01 21 10 COMMENTS mi 0 0 Ln A LU 0 0 0 Uj I... 0 > y ❑ DESIGN /DEVELOPMENT 09 PERMITTING & BIDDING ❑ CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS 9-01 .1 �I 7 LU 6S- THIS DRAWING IS AN INS$r�R 0 UROICE 41111- _ LLNR IN THE, PROPERTY OF THE ENGINEER, AND SHALL N4�T RE IF�CDUCED, Ul�LI$H_ _ Q� EDtIN_ANY.WAY WITHOUT THE WRITTEN CONSENT X f THW WINEER. a (QCOPYRIGPV 2010. NOT PUBLISHED. v COMBOS EDTWiTI; �a� SiGNIIV NENGINEER'S SEAL x Uj mi 0 Ln CD M LU M Uj I... 0 > y J J N. J � W LLJ CO Q Q cn W CD J C 1l7 15" RCP FROM CONTROL STRUCTURE AT EL. 29.75' TO EXISTING STORMWATER MANHOLE AT EL. 29.0' 20'X20' SIGHT VISIBILITY l TRIANGLE / FOR R. 0. W. -� 70.4' z NOTE: CONCERNING NEW CURBS: 4' -1" NON TRAFFIC GRATE v TOP OF SKIMMER (SEE DETAIL) 1. Share dumpster on the adjacent CONTRACTOR DOING THIS WORK TO ty ( SUBMIT PLANS AND BE APPROVED BY " --�}-- 6" FREE BOARD 6" Proper also owned by the CITY PLANS EXAMINER AND ENGINEER applicant) through appropriate PRIOR TO FABRICATION. 15" RCP agreements with the city. Dumpster 00 6" enclosure shall be upgraded to city FIRE HYDRANT 114 (EXISTING) -' 6" specifications index 701 (wooden). � TIE TO EXISTING 6 " WATER LINE � P ( ) CONC SLAB K � V -6" 2. Traffic impact fees to be GRAPHIC SCALE gr,n determined and paid prior to C.O. LC r% r, 1rl /l/ 3. All outdoor lighting fixtures shall - -_ _ , 82.8 IN SET be solely on the building. -_ 109'5J -- - -_ y g 1 inch = 10 M _ 4. Sign must include the address of ......... ............................... the building. - �V - NEW 6 --E�- 6'_GAS - MODIFIED TYPE "D" _ _ 5. All applicable building permits will -- E CONTROL STRUCTURE ti V• `L/ p • Ac ,MOD, COW J n RO1 STRUCTURE ' Monument / 6' High Sign Al cz) � 2 I � ;� X22 X �X � 0 2 soh 0)•0 m E Na v CO , X / 2" MA� LL (TY . 26.4" X4.01 Ql 1,9 4`3 �0 E� T P �CUR� _ � GI/ be obtained for all work performed EC 0� - �X _ - - _ ` 6_grER N.T.S. and receive all final inspections prior to the issuance of a C.O. S IV - - -__ • 63, 2 _ _ 9 - _ _ _ 6. The usage of the second floor �EXjsj /�G cURB� - - - - _ _ _ _ will be limited to apartments. 24 as �� zl_Ivll R /NE _ _ 7. All asphalt on site except perimeter Ppo /V, 2' CURB BUTT 2 ,� - _ 0• - - - sidewalks to be removed. 2, 2 79 °70'09 E �_ �C�_�_ W 14 �� �° • _ 8. Elevator is not required as per ' S. 8�0 • 2 ' N 9.95' - � `� Eyi 4 SID 6-W 20 AS - _ FL building code section 11 -4.1.3 � E�ALK 2° '�s�'h'.gL - _ exception (1). 4.0 lv �°�' S� EX /ST E� T - 20'X20' Q s 2' cUR EC% POSE 9. Sidewalks and sidewalk ramps 3 ISIBILITY _ �°�' PP 4' COA/C e c�rrER per City of Clearwater Index #109, IA 02, 2, _ w�iL/- A.D.A. Truncated domes per D.O.T. 9.9 77 43 138' � 4' # 7. Index 304 on construction plans. Q � v ' ' 12' �� • Q 12 3 �' 10. Use standard pre-painted disabled 3 v 7' �°, 'r ° parking sign on 1/8" thick sheet 6" PVC PIPE 5 ° o= - - �- _ \ _ L,gNOSC�P Z 18.0, " X N aluminum. mount to 2: HD Galy. 9 @ 0.2% SLOPE - E • 0 o w a ^x std. wt. steel pipe. mount in 8 "X EXT. NEW WALL 'j 0 4' ° �� o 2' -6" concrete mass. Finish top of NEW H. C. � � , mass level with slight raised wash SIGN �• , J. x19.3 EXISTING approximatley 1/2" above level of o EXISTING o DUMPSTE � o TWO STORY � � Turf /Sod. X , g (U MAS. BUILDING 1150) �, 48 1 ' (SEE 1) 11. Standard handicapeA parking .15' O I st. RETAIL FL.- 1,610 S.F. W ; stall and sign details to conform to E 757.02 0. 0 6 2nd . APT FL . = 1 768 S. F. �� 1. Sidewalks and sidewalk romps ad)aoent to or a part o/ the prohat shall be deslgnad and art 3 div 14 sec 3-1408, page / ` , constructed conalstent with Gty o/ Gearwater Contract SpedOrntllons and Standards Index 7 7 (F �, X o IIduding the AD.A (Puncoted domes per D.A.T. Index 13") Include Index ,1109 on the 3-81-2 o f the c i t o f c 1 e a rwate r land (� _ BOTTOM FINISH FLOOR construct /on plans y 0 ELEV.= UI�iI 31.07 �� °o ALL EXISTING OVERHEAD UnLITLlTY LINES development regulation. ASSED 0� 1X_ _ _ AS PART OFECONSMUC ONRGROUND 12. All si na e include handicapped) to 61.01 BASE ELEV. _50 - 58.76 ° o g g ( PP ) _ _ W Water meters are not permitted to be located within driveways, obtained to upgrade parking on the sidewalks or other impervious H. C. RAMP TO BE -- 1 71\, areas meet city requirements per index 119 96.34 FLUSHED Vl//TH PA IMENT _ - - 0 °� Handicap ramp from stall to 15.90 sidewalk to meet city requirements PER F. D. 0. T. INDEX ,#304. 1.92' per index 109. stall painting to meet VARIES 3.0' I_ 2 _I RETENTION POND CROSS SECTION N.T.: THIS DRAWING IS AN INSTRUM ,�9 S NI 9 'S LL REMAIN THE PROPERTY OF THE ENGINEER, AND SHALL NOT - 1301 UBL;I'SH P1. OR USED IN ANY WAY WITHOUT THE WRITTEN CONSENT OF .�HZ- EI�GI , E(R. F Q: CbPY,.R GHT 2009. NOT PUBLISHED. ./ N o • P 4y • •ra to COPIES OF TH �! ARB!VOT: VALID UNLESS EMBOSSED WITH THE IGMNG ENGINEER'S SEAL BLUE BACKGROUND 00 WHITE BACKGROUND RETAINING WALL 12" FTP - 25 1-1/2"R 1/2" WIDE WHITE BORDER AND SYMBOL SIGN SPECIFICATIONS PARKING BY ' 1. 18 "x12" LOGO SIGN DISABLED „ 2• 2 SIGN COMBINATION 1 SERIES C REFLECTIVE SHEETING PERMIT LETTERS ONLY 1/2" BLACK 3. LETTERS TO BE BORDER 1" HIGH SERIES "C" 1.5" 4. SIGN TO BE MADE OF WHITE $255 FINE �„ ALUMINUM BACKGROUND 5. POST TO BE MADE OF F.S. 318.18 1 GALVANIZED STEEL 1.5" (SEE DETAIL) 3" 6" 3" 6. SIGNAGE PER A.D.A. FTP - 55 REQUIREMENTS HANDICAP PARKING SIGN DETAIL N.T.S. city requirements. 1.0' General Note: If the proposed project necessitates infrastructure modifications to satisfy 13. All utilities are existing at the building site- specific water capacity and pressure requirements and /or wastewater capacity requirements, So no new construction is re uired. 60.68 the modifications shall be completed by the applicant and at their expense. If underground water q mains and hydrants are to be installed, the installation shall be completed and in- service prior to construction in accordance with Fire Department requirements. N.T.S. TRUNCA TED DOME PER F.D. 0. T. INDEX 304 Pri SONEY FM LLC EB # 9746 6306 DOUNE CT. AMPA, FL 33647 H: (727)420-4796 rAX: (81 )972 -2846 'JJ. MAR 10 2010 01 NEW S/W FULL LENGTH CURB TO MEET CITY 8 8" MASONRY OR I IMPORTANT JOB NOTES / REFERENCES 3. All outdoor lighting fixtures shall - -_ _ , 82.8 IN SET be solely on the building. -_ 109'5J -- - -_ y g 1 inch = 10 M _ 4. Sign must include the address of ......... ............................... the building. - �V - NEW 6 --E�- 6'_GAS - MODIFIED TYPE "D" _ _ 5. All applicable building permits will -- E CONTROL STRUCTURE ti V• `L/ p • Ac ,MOD, COW J n RO1 STRUCTURE ' Monument / 6' High Sign Al cz) � 2 I � ;� X22 X �X � 0 2 soh 0)•0 m E Na v CO , X / 2" MA� LL (TY . 26.4" X4.01 Ql 1,9 4`3 �0 E� T P �CUR� _ � GI/ be obtained for all work performed EC 0� - �X _ - - _ ` 6_grER N.T.S. and receive all final inspections prior to the issuance of a C.O. S IV - - -__ • 63, 2 _ _ 9 - _ _ _ 6. The usage of the second floor �EXjsj /�G cURB� - - - - _ _ _ _ will be limited to apartments. 24 as �� zl_Ivll R /NE _ _ 7. All asphalt on site except perimeter Ppo /V, 2' CURB BUTT 2 ,� - _ 0• - - - sidewalks to be removed. 2, 2 79 °70'09 E �_ �C�_�_ W 14 �� �° • _ 8. Elevator is not required as per ' S. 8�0 • 2 ' N 9.95' - � `� Eyi 4 SID 6-W 20 AS - _ FL building code section 11 -4.1.3 � E�ALK 2° '�s�'h'.gL - _ exception (1). 4.0 lv �°�' S� EX /ST E� T - 20'X20' Q s 2' cUR EC% POSE 9. Sidewalks and sidewalk ramps 3 ISIBILITY _ �°�' PP 4' COA/C e c�rrER per City of Clearwater Index #109, IA 02, 2, _ w�iL/- A.D.A. Truncated domes per D.O.T. 9.9 77 43 138' � 4' # 7. Index 304 on construction plans. Q � v ' ' 12' �� • Q 12 3 �' 10. Use standard pre-painted disabled 3 v 7' �°, 'r ° parking sign on 1/8" thick sheet 6" PVC PIPE 5 ° o= - - �- _ \ _ L,gNOSC�P Z 18.0, " X N aluminum. mount to 2: HD Galy. 9 @ 0.2% SLOPE - E • 0 o w a ^x std. wt. steel pipe. mount in 8 "X EXT. NEW WALL 'j 0 4' ° �� o 2' -6" concrete mass. Finish top of NEW H. C. � � , mass level with slight raised wash SIGN �• , J. x19.3 EXISTING approximatley 1/2" above level of o EXISTING o DUMPSTE � o TWO STORY � � Turf /Sod. X , g (U MAS. BUILDING 1150) �, 48 1 ' (SEE 1) 11. Standard handicapeA parking .15' O I st. RETAIL FL.- 1,610 S.F. W ; stall and sign details to conform to E 757.02 0. 0 6 2nd . APT FL . = 1 768 S. F. �� 1. Sidewalks and sidewalk romps ad)aoent to or a part o/ the prohat shall be deslgnad and art 3 div 14 sec 3-1408, page / ` , constructed conalstent with Gty o/ Gearwater Contract SpedOrntllons and Standards Index 7 7 (F �, X o IIduding the AD.A (Puncoted domes per D.A.T. Index 13") Include Index ,1109 on the 3-81-2 o f the c i t o f c 1 e a rwate r land (� _ BOTTOM FINISH FLOOR construct /on plans y 0 ELEV.= UI�iI 31.07 �� °o ALL EXISTING OVERHEAD UnLITLlTY LINES development regulation. ASSED 0� 1X_ _ _ AS PART OFECONSMUC ONRGROUND 12. All si na e include handicapped) to 61.01 BASE ELEV. _50 - 58.76 ° o g g ( PP ) _ _ W Water meters are not permitted to be located within driveways, obtained to upgrade parking on the sidewalks or other impervious H. C. RAMP TO BE -- 1 71\, areas meet city requirements per index 119 96.34 FLUSHED Vl//TH PA IMENT _ - - 0 °� Handicap ramp from stall to 15.90 sidewalk to meet city requirements PER F. D. 0. T. INDEX ,#304. 1.92' per index 109. stall painting to meet VARIES 3.0' I_ 2 _I RETENTION POND CROSS SECTION N.T.: THIS DRAWING IS AN INSTRUM ,�9 S NI 9 'S LL REMAIN THE PROPERTY OF THE ENGINEER, AND SHALL NOT - 1301 UBL;I'SH P1. OR USED IN ANY WAY WITHOUT THE WRITTEN CONSENT OF .�HZ- EI�GI , E(R. F Q: CbPY,.R GHT 2009. NOT PUBLISHED. ./ N o • P 4y • •ra to COPIES OF TH �! ARB!VOT: VALID UNLESS EMBOSSED WITH THE IGMNG ENGINEER'S SEAL BLUE BACKGROUND 00 WHITE BACKGROUND RETAINING WALL 12" FTP - 25 1-1/2"R 1/2" WIDE WHITE BORDER AND SYMBOL SIGN SPECIFICATIONS PARKING BY ' 1. 18 "x12" LOGO SIGN DISABLED „ 2• 2 SIGN COMBINATION 1 SERIES C REFLECTIVE SHEETING PERMIT LETTERS ONLY 1/2" BLACK 3. LETTERS TO BE BORDER 1" HIGH SERIES "C" 1.5" 4. SIGN TO BE MADE OF WHITE $255 FINE �„ ALUMINUM BACKGROUND 5. POST TO BE MADE OF F.S. 318.18 1 GALVANIZED STEEL 1.5" (SEE DETAIL) 3" 6" 3" 6. SIGNAGE PER A.D.A. FTP - 55 REQUIREMENTS HANDICAP PARKING SIGN DETAIL N.T.S. city requirements. 1.0' General Note: If the proposed project necessitates infrastructure modifications to satisfy 13. All utilities are existing at the building site- specific water capacity and pressure requirements and /or wastewater capacity requirements, So no new construction is re uired. 60.68 the modifications shall be completed by the applicant and at their expense. If underground water q mains and hydrants are to be installed, the installation shall be completed and in- service prior to construction in accordance with Fire Department requirements. N.T.S. TRUNCA TED DOME PER F.D. 0. T. INDEX 304 Pri SONEY FM LLC EB # 9746 6306 DOUNE CT. AMPA, FL 33647 H: (727)420-4796 rAX: (81 )972 -2846 'JJ. MAR 10 2010 01 ti V• `L/ p • Ac ,MOD, COW J n RO1 STRUCTURE ' Monument / 6' High Sign Al cz) � 2 I � ;� X22 X �X � 0 2 soh 0)•0 m E Na v CO , X / 2" MA� LL (TY . 26.4" X4.01 Ql 1,9 4`3 �0 E� T P �CUR� _ � GI/ be obtained for all work performed EC 0� - �X _ - - _ ` 6_grER N.T.S. and receive all final inspections prior to the issuance of a C.O. S IV - - -__ • 63, 2 _ _ 9 - _ _ _ 6. The usage of the second floor �EXjsj /�G cURB� - - - - _ _ _ _ will be limited to apartments. 24 as �� zl_Ivll R /NE _ _ 7. All asphalt on site except perimeter Ppo /V, 2' CURB BUTT 2 ,� - _ 0• - - - sidewalks to be removed. 2, 2 79 °70'09 E �_ �C�_�_ W 14 �� �° • _ 8. Elevator is not required as per ' S. 8�0 • 2 ' N 9.95' - � `� Eyi 4 SID 6-W 20 AS - _ FL building code section 11 -4.1.3 � E�ALK 2° '�s�'h'.gL - _ exception (1). 4.0 lv �°�' S� EX /ST E� T - 20'X20' Q s 2' cUR EC% POSE 9. Sidewalks and sidewalk ramps 3 ISIBILITY _ �°�' PP 4' COA/C e c�rrER per City of Clearwater Index #109, IA 02, 2, _ w�iL/- A.D.A. Truncated domes per D.O.T. 9.9 77 43 138' � 4' # 7. Index 304 on construction plans. Q � v ' ' 12' �� • Q 12 3 �' 10. Use standard pre-painted disabled 3 v 7' �°, 'r ° parking sign on 1/8" thick sheet 6" PVC PIPE 5 ° o= - - �- _ \ _ L,gNOSC�P Z 18.0, " X N aluminum. mount to 2: HD Galy. 9 @ 0.2% SLOPE - E • 0 o w a ^x std. wt. steel pipe. mount in 8 "X EXT. NEW WALL 'j 0 4' ° �� o 2' -6" concrete mass. Finish top of NEW H. C. � � , mass level with slight raised wash SIGN �• , J. x19.3 EXISTING approximatley 1/2" above level of o EXISTING o DUMPSTE � o TWO STORY � � Turf /Sod. X , g (U MAS. BUILDING 1150) �, 48 1 ' (SEE 1) 11. Standard handicapeA parking .15' O I st. RETAIL FL.- 1,610 S.F. W ; stall and sign details to conform to E 757.02 0. 0 6 2nd . APT FL . = 1 768 S. F. �� 1. Sidewalks and sidewalk romps ad)aoent to or a part o/ the prohat shall be deslgnad and art 3 div 14 sec 3-1408, page / ` , constructed conalstent with Gty o/ Gearwater Contract SpedOrntllons and Standards Index 7 7 (F �, X o IIduding the AD.A (Puncoted domes per D.A.T. Index 13") Include Index ,1109 on the 3-81-2 o f the c i t o f c 1 e a rwate r land (� _ BOTTOM FINISH FLOOR construct /on plans y 0 ELEV.= UI�iI 31.07 �� °o ALL EXISTING OVERHEAD UnLITLlTY LINES development regulation. ASSED 0� 1X_ _ _ AS PART OFECONSMUC ONRGROUND 12. All si na e include handicapped) to 61.01 BASE ELEV. _50 - 58.76 ° o g g ( PP ) _ _ W Water meters are not permitted to be located within driveways, obtained to upgrade parking on the sidewalks or other impervious H. C. RAMP TO BE -- 1 71\, areas meet city requirements per index 119 96.34 FLUSHED Vl//TH PA IMENT _ - - 0 °� Handicap ramp from stall to 15.90 sidewalk to meet city requirements PER F. D. 0. T. INDEX ,#304. 1.92' per index 109. stall painting to meet VARIES 3.0' I_ 2 _I RETENTION POND CROSS SECTION N.T.: THIS DRAWING IS AN INSTRUM ,�9 S NI 9 'S LL REMAIN THE PROPERTY OF THE ENGINEER, AND SHALL NOT - 1301 UBL;I'SH P1. OR USED IN ANY WAY WITHOUT THE WRITTEN CONSENT OF .�HZ- EI�GI , E(R. F Q: CbPY,.R GHT 2009. NOT PUBLISHED. ./ N o • P 4y • •ra to COPIES OF TH �! ARB!VOT: VALID UNLESS EMBOSSED WITH THE IGMNG ENGINEER'S SEAL BLUE BACKGROUND 00 WHITE BACKGROUND RETAINING WALL 12" FTP - 25 1-1/2"R 1/2" WIDE WHITE BORDER AND SYMBOL SIGN SPECIFICATIONS PARKING BY ' 1. 18 "x12" LOGO SIGN DISABLED „ 2• 2 SIGN COMBINATION 1 SERIES C REFLECTIVE SHEETING PERMIT LETTERS ONLY 1/2" BLACK 3. LETTERS TO BE BORDER 1" HIGH SERIES "C" 1.5" 4. SIGN TO BE MADE OF WHITE $255 FINE �„ ALUMINUM BACKGROUND 5. POST TO BE MADE OF F.S. 318.18 1 GALVANIZED STEEL 1.5" (SEE DETAIL) 3" 6" 3" 6. SIGNAGE PER A.D.A. FTP - 55 REQUIREMENTS HANDICAP PARKING SIGN DETAIL N.T.S. city requirements. 1.0' General Note: If the proposed project necessitates infrastructure modifications to satisfy 13. All utilities are existing at the building site- specific water capacity and pressure requirements and /or wastewater capacity requirements, So no new construction is re uired. 60.68 the modifications shall be completed by the applicant and at their expense. If underground water q mains and hydrants are to be installed, the installation shall be completed and in- service prior to construction in accordance with Fire Department requirements. N.T.S. TRUNCA TED DOME PER F.D. 0. T. INDEX 304 Pri SONEY FM LLC EB # 9746 6306 DOUNE CT. AMPA, FL 33647 H: (727)420-4796 rAX: (81 )972 -2846 'JJ. MAR 10 2010 01 WHITE $255 FINE �„ ALUMINUM BACKGROUND 5. POST TO BE MADE OF F.S. 318.18 1 GALVANIZED STEEL 1.5" (SEE DETAIL) 3" 6" 3" 6. SIGNAGE PER A.D.A. FTP - 55 REQUIREMENTS HANDICAP PARKING SIGN DETAIL N.T.S. city requirements. 1.0' General Note: If the proposed project necessitates infrastructure modifications to satisfy 13. All utilities are existing at the building site- specific water capacity and pressure requirements and /or wastewater capacity requirements, So no new construction is re uired. 60.68 the modifications shall be completed by the applicant and at their expense. If underground water q mains and hydrants are to be installed, the installation shall be completed and in- service prior to construction in accordance with Fire Department requirements. N.T.S. TRUNCA TED DOME PER F.D. 0. T. INDEX 304 Pri SONEY FM LLC EB # 9746 6306 DOUNE CT. AMPA, FL 33647 H: (727)420-4796 rAX: (81 )972 -2846 'JJ. MAR 10 2010 01 R15MOVE cON ��� -6 J* L E TREE - OAK _50 A L L LL A- l L� L 2 of L L LLLL L 'LL m N COO 'EX. 26, 44 � f EXISTING, TREES TO SE REIN E-1)(7) -(2)-12- OAK' (2)_'I3- .OAK e1)_ 144, OAK 3�t 16: PALM (1),-17" OA k LEGEND EX. TREESTO BE REMOVED L LL '0 BE REM EX.. BUILDING T OVED' EX., CONC', TO 'BE .'REMOVED THIS DRAWING IS AN fiNSTRUhM'4 F. NY,$HALL, REMAIN THE-PRdPEOTY, OF' THE ENGINEER AND SHALL - -N T-,B EP�ForF4J.BLlSWED,',,OR USE.D �,, K" ANY - WW,,WlTHOUT_ T FT E •t I EM THE WR!Th�Nl CONSENT- F,:T P,'�PPPYR;GHT,�P_jq:; NOT PUBLISHED, 47431 f 10 Dr., Rd, 1 #47431, COPIES R OT VALID, UNLESS 0 EMBOSSED` WlltfT3Hf*E :SIGNING, ENGINEER'S _SEAL, REMOVE--J EXBUILDING SILT FENCE REMOVE' EkTREES 0 mciviuvc EX. THE . S, REMOVE� EX. CONGd CURB 7' Kl: -Qa id. EX". CONC. Ul LAN TER Q, -N 7_ MIN 2 01,/2-13/20,1-0 R.G. 08 14 20,0 "9 ZE-V.,, DESCRIPTION BY' DATE, %jA,K,UEmNn "E"Nu HUE 0 M nPLEA", 'LIENT:' SULLAIMAR DRAWN' BY; R6, J,CHECKED BY RG IROJECT: REFURS. _ 12)''BUILDIOS scALE-'. I IN low- .;DCATION: 1505 FT., HARRISON DATE.,, 02/1,12/019 503, MARSHALL FILE .'NAME PROJECT SHEET,,- DE$QRlPTl0.N DIEMOLITION PLAN SPNR C 317 r77- :,EXISTING PLAN .._ 58.9' PROPOSED:. .PLAN , FACADE .1 ADDITION ATTACHED TO EXISTING CMU WALL 2nd', FLOOR: PLAN, SCALE: 1/8" = l'-O" REMOVE.- EXISTING, WINDOWS N'DOWS AND, REPLACE-- WITH' NEW ALL WINDOWS, – ADD NEW PLANS DECORATIVE TOWER OVER A8,OER PL DECORA STUCCO AND' PAINT OVER ENTRANCE -NEW WD- CONSTRUCTION QIMENTI'ONIAL TILES , (L 0, 71 T -T r `WD' ENTRANCE' CANOPY–, J-41 LP 0 WD ENTRANCE CANOP Y 7, Tr o 40 a- SIGANAbE F2 04 EXISTING- "CMU,,-' "FACADE , f /—DECORATIVE TOWER OVER 1/--EN - ENTRANCE REMOVE EXISTING WINDOWS AND REPLACE WITH ALL AS PER PLANS, NEW WINDOWS , ADIJ NEW TA FF EL. 31.07" FF EL, 3t07,_ E.'G, EL. 30.14 —E.G, EL. 31, eXISTING dOOR, ' &r S= -REMOVE' EXISTING DO OR _NORTH FACADE- WEST FACADE 'AND' REPLACE, WITH ;NEW, SCALE:'�� 1/8", /8 TO,_BE REMOVED' & SCALE:, 1 WINDOW ADD NEW', AS' PER REPLACED," - ADD NEW AS PER' PLANS PLANS EXISTING CMU' FACADE REPAIR AND REPAINT I NEW SYNTHETIC 890 WD FACADE ADDITION' ATTACHED TO EXISTING CMU :WALL.-W/ ABOVE, 8-" CANTILEVER- OF TOWER NEW SYNTHETIC -8 i's WD FACADE ADDITION, ATTACHED TO EXISTING CMU 'WALL W/ .ABOVE 8" CANTILEVER OF TOWER REMOVE' EXISTING WINDOWS AND REPLACE WITH .ALL` -- NEW WINDOWS;- -ADD NEW AS PER PLANS I L J__ ___EXISTING CMU FACADE /—EXISTING CMU' FACADE REPAIR AND REPAINT REPAIR AND REPAINT NEW ZYNTHETIO 8" WD FACADE AAbu,Dl ION L_ J 'ATTACHED, To L_ EXls_'-n I ill t] CMU 'WALL FF EL., 31.07 E.G. EL. 30.9, -"_,,,, FF EL. 31.07 PROPOSED' BUILDIN�;. — -CADE� SL SOUTH -FACADE EAST FA C P off' SCALE: S AL6 . 4_1 � c► 3 02/2-1/2010 2 J. P, Y.f - - , 01, 2/2010 ca LLU 06/GT/2009 REV: DESCRIPTION BY' DATE MARIDEN" "EN' n fl%`jlE,wC%0` M PLEA`. 3 02/2-1/2010 2 J. P, Y.f - - , 01, 2/2010 1 R. G. 06/GT/2009 REV: DESCRIPTION BY' DATE MARIDEN" "EN' n fl%`jlE,wC%0` M PLEA`. 'CLIENT:',HASHIM SULLAIMAR DRAWN; 13Y. _RG, :CHECKED -B 'RG -PROJECT: REFURB. (2) ,BUILDINGS SCALE: I vr 0" LOCATIOW 1-505. FT: HARRISON 503 MARSHALL DATE.. 02112109 FILE NAME PROJECT #; SHEET DESCRIPTION:- ELEVATION PLAN SPNR to .417 GRAPHIC SCALE 5 0 5 10 20 ( IN FEET ) _ — - - ►�— ` ! 1 inch =10M _ _ �� 22 E �_ - VS 2 18 V X� l ' ELEcT LIG - v '� p046 M G 6 _ / - _ _- VS 14 ' ` ` - - _ PLANT MATERIAL SCHEDULE 0 6 19 � - �v X4.63, 2�• 13 � �_ _ � � o VS -`_� -_ -_ � •� —' 'p RI LA �� _ ` _ — — — — ` SYMBOL LEGEND COMMON NAME BOTANICAL NAME SPECIFICATIONS QUANTITY —_` ACC S v - _ _ �j • f _ - A AFRICAN IRIS DIETES SPP. 1 GAL. FULL 18 X - _ _ pp 2 CURB v L 2 2 _ — O�' � � — _ ® MU MUHLY GRASS MUHLENBERGIA 3 GAL. FULL 3 — CAPILLARIS r� 7n c TT - / ►. X 2� • O l� / `� e 0 " E � �_� � 8' HEIGHT Oj — _ � LIG LIGUSTRUM TREE LIGUSTRUM 2" CALIPER 2 X,1,� • �, ; 9 95 2 _ � � JAPONICUM MULTI —TRUNK p d v ^ (� ' 2� - ' Sp i1 7' — �_ _ CM CAPE MYRTLE AGE NDICAEMIA 8' " CALIPER 1 26 _ __ O / v 2 CU % ,o0LE SP CABBAGE PALM SABAL PALMETTO 10' C.T. STRAIGHT 6 Q� ��, • X PP 4 CONC UTTER CY BALD CYPRESS TAXODIUM DISTICHUM 2 1/2" CAL. 5 MAGNOLIA MG LITTLE GEM MAGNOLIA GRAN IGEMRA 10' HT. 2 C Y _ 2 -1 /2" CAL. 9 �, e .9 o V �• ° ,�, F L � 3 GAL. F FLAX LILY DIANELLA ENSIFOLIA 50 0 � �, �' S 2 r O.C. FULL / X . e� 7 Q Q � 3 GAL. 18 -24" HT. r ` SANDANKWA VIBURNUM — : • • • VS N VS VIBURNUM SUSPENSUM PLANTING /3F O.C. 65 r , _ 9 .9 — O r,, 1 a x W N 1 GAL. JUN JUNIPER JUNIPERUS SPP. 2' O.C. FULL 33 3 GAL. 57 Z INDIAN HAWTHORNE RAPHIOLEPIS INDICA 2 -1/2' O.C. 2 M = = 0.0 - EXISTING TWO STO Y l T4 ALL A MULCH SHREDDED CYRESS 3" DEPTH Y . / 9 • O — � 4,3 ►Q S. BUILDING #50 , S 2° , Q4 PERIMETER BUFFER SHRUBS SHALL BE MAINTAINED AT A HT. OF 36" EXCEPT WHEN LOCATED 9 I St. RETAIL FL. = 7, 61 O S. F. , � W/I THE VISIBILITY TRIANGLE, WHERE THEY SHALL BE MAINTAINED AT A HT. OF 30" E 7 /N+R 157 0 �� • _ 2nd APT. FL. — I , / V V . F ' I n 1. strutted and stewolk romps o fCle r to or o part o/ ci project anal/ to dards Id and .i J 1109hvcted cons /stmt w/ln Gty of Clearwater Contract SpedReoHana and Standards Index � /109, _ BOTTOM FINISH FLOOR n� tndudlny the AD.A (Truncated domes per D.O.T. Index 1304) Include Index /!09 on the COn9t/IJat /On plane. �Q• _ ELEV.= 31.07 ,O ALL EXlSnNG OVERHEAD UnLITLITYLINES 00 � SHALL BE RELOCATED UNDERGROUND PERIMETER REQUIREMENTS g 12 — _ 58 76' ' Q AS PART OF CONSTRUCTION. NORTH 3 _ Water meters are not permitted to be located within driveways, I = sidewalks or other impervious 149.95 , _ 35 = (4.2) 4 TREES REQUIRED R I ___ areas 10' LANDSCAPAE BUFFER REQIURED 1� 9 3 �' o 15 1 9 A A \—S—P/ 3 11449.95' _ 35 = (4.2) 4 TREES REQUIRED U VS SP A 5' LANDSCAPAE BUFFER REQIURED THIS DRAWING IS AN INSTRUMENT OF,S R�V6E - ",IS ft REMAIN THE PROPERTY OF THE ENGINEER, AND SHALL NOT BE REP, ED "Pl1'BU e, D114R SED IN ANY WAY WITHOUT THE WRITTEN CONSENT OF THE; E� ER.0 S N S c e COPkRI HT 2009. NOT PUBLISHED. � •, � � . No A� A31 Dr. Rai , ne: „� 7 3 COPIES OF THESE ` %Y{ � NOT VAJ ID UNLESS EMBOSSED WITH ;;TH !.�IvjING",ENGINEER'S SEAL , y, n General Note: If the proposed project necessitates infrastructure modifications to satisfy site— specific water capacity and pressure requirements and /or wastewater capacity requirements, the modifications shall be completed by the applicant and at their expense. If underground water mains and hydrants are to be installed, the installation shall be completed and in— service prior to construction in accordance with Fire Department requirements. SONEY FM LLC EB # 9746 16306 DOUNE CT. TAMPA, FL 33647 PH: (727)420 -4796 FAX: (813)972 -2846 EAST 50.81' - 35 = (1.45) 1 TREE REQUIRED 5' LANDSCAPAE BUFFER REQIURED WEST 50.81' - 35 = (1.45) 1 10' LANDSCAPAE BUFFER PARKING LOT <4,000 S.F. NO LANDSCAPE REQUIRED TREE REQUIRED REQIURED til MAR 10 2010��,�,, -> I , I I I I I . , I � 4 ? _ -- Z, - - - , - : - - !1 , � 0E 1N EAL' - ,N10.TE r I � I � I - - . - THE ; � I I - I - '' � __ �` Y., CONFORMANCE- �'I M PLEMENTATION' OF' THIS DRNNING, SHALL. CONFORM T - 0--, T -_ � -A .1 a � �_ 1''" , , , I L-24RE:VAILI 'G,"bRtINAN - - _� H GHES �',STI NDARD5,� OF' T -,TO AL ,,P GES',1 , � � , 1, - - � 11 I -1 I .- , N� _1 � I � I � I , � . � - I i , ,_ '' - ... .... , ,, i', _'�% -� � _ __ - __ I I- "', , , '' ` , , - � -_ �,-_ ,-'-- , -, __ _ , " - - , - - - L BE,ACCOMPLISHE[ , , _' ' ' CATION N �`,' 6 F' A I , �-.-i IRRIGATIQN:,I�EXE 514 - I 1. - ) -,�BY- THEE - 'INS - TAL ,TIO '' -,-_., z - I 1, ; '00 ;' " ' ' -_ - - ' ' _� ' `STANDARbS_ I 1 R �COVERAGE,UNDERGROU D' -IRRIGATION-,, - 1, � % OVE LAP-` N _'SYSTEM 1 O,-,�THE � I - ' P - - ' � ''' ' '-'-' _ 11 I - , , , -1 ;, ,, I-ANb. s0ta F- THE,"FLORiDA ]RkiCATION �SOCIETY,,, �f , I � , ,,_ F.I.CATI-ONS ,O, . - I I -1 I � _'"', � . - I - ,, � -, - I -1 11 1. , - . I . I i' '3; SAFETY`�- i;DUE, ;CARE. 'PROTEC ION, -SHALL -'BE �P[�OVIDED`70',- PREVENT �DAMAGES� fl, T �, _ - "-, - I L I _!, � � I I - :__ - I I , - , - . , - ABOUT , .IN,- U RY` TO I I ) I � " - t - 11 -1 , - � I SAND ' ' '-' RVI,CESi,�'UTILITIES,-�STRUIC.-FU,RES'L.-�,�Td-''ON-O-R,4 , I I I __ - , - I � � � I TH'E�,'�,'SITE--"b-U-R'ING���THE 'CO.UR,5E,,--OF'-jHE W0_RK;- z 7 - - 11 - � I I � 1 � I q I i - I - -1 I I : I - I ,4i, :OWNER THE*�, CONTRACTOR; SHALL -'N_OT_'PERFORy ANY ,WQfRrv,rTHAT TO � : -, ' ' - - " . -1 _ .' � __ '_ -, ' _4L -, ' 0 I I I Lf L -OR TO THE BEST"- INTERESTS--,:_OF. THE::, - , ' - . -IS' 1, , 14 141' � . I � � - - S �OPINIOI, is,, c o TP,ARY , ,E1 e H , NO I N �10 �4 R �, - - � I ; - W E ," � I � I - . I - - � ___ I'll- - " __ 11-1 - - I I , , - I i � DEBRIS AND ,WASTE .SHALE. BE-- - 1, ; '6,,tLtAN� 'U'J5-,�`�Af THE `-_6b_mPLETibN',�,b1F Wb R-K,, ALL, -DE .1 * - _, __ � , -, - I � -1 � ;t , 1 C'CLLANED ,UP'ANb'. REmbVED'fRdM! THE'-,�',SITE.' , 1 I I - - I ., I— I I I I I j . f � - '6'. ROUGH `QRADE:`.'-,'THE (,�E.NEP�'AL--(,-ONTRACTOq-L-',,-'LSHALL,-,�',-F I - '� � ' - ,- 11 .1 . ,URNj`SH',,,k 'RO0GR_,-`,6_RADET0 " � 1. -_ "" L � I I _ � - --- - :1, - - - % _1 --,--, - ", - � -1 , . - I I E -4�'��,`," OF hk'E'D' ', CONTROL ELEVATIONS,-` FREE , -OF , DEBRIS--- ,�, CONSTRIJCTION'�,VASTE � AND; i L , -1 � i ( � I 1. 7 i - I WEED. I � � ,- . - 11-1 __ � � I : : . � , I I , , I , "', TECH NfCAL NOTE-S.i, .�. - 1_1 � -1 __ - I- I I I - " " � - F . .�', -1 . -_ M_ � 1,,.__GRADE'._,_ALL, FORNISIAED�-Pt�MITS;.-�S'HALL-�'BE-, FLORIDA,,_G'RADE,-' :PER , GRADES, ,AND- �_' � � - - I � __ , - I_ �1'1 � ' 1_11�1 -1 - � -:,-- _� _' L", �, �"" L "�'� �'� � -- L. I � I -1 _' ,, I " I i T CALL ' . - , � _ - � I . . , - `6` FOR NUR, ERY,,ST0CK"PA`RT- � 1; , - . F AGRICUL7URE' TA N - A_RbS,�_,'' S S &` Ili �FLORI A., �,Ek. -, S , - b"' b' _0 I DICIER: -11 __ , --- � - I - - - - I -STAN DARDI�.-�-.` I ,'PIL4"N'YED',� AdC� O'R'DING-:TO PROPER- � _ _NU � RSERY� i , I � - , I AND, . ,,, - ': , _ , , , �� ', - - __ ' 1 1. I- i, -, P_ - ,, - I- - I , , VARIETY---�, . :SOD: -SOD AS 1-` SPECIFIED �-SHALL_,_BE CERt�'F['E6,,T'R'UE",TO,"L,.� I I I I I 1 1 I -1 , ' - ` -IN,'- RD 15 RO ' , � � �: .t_ � SA LI-Ep,"' AND 'FERTILIZED,- I � _�ID'�-ORQWN,� LAID 'STAGGERED, -7'' � 0, ", - : '', -1 , . � � - " 1 , - ,- , I I - , � i I - "OP " DRESSED", WITH- A MINIMUM `_13"� �_ � '� 1`1 . � - - 1.0 - -3;wULCH.' LA 4DSCAPING ,SHALL,.. Ll I 1. L, IL' - � , - , L � MULCH I ,1 H ' IN " '_ - � � 11 I , I I � iA'YtR�OF -GRADE "'A"' ALL PLAINTING -BEDS AND AROUNb ALL _ - - I ., - I - - _�N- LCH NG-` I I I 11 - ' FREE ',STANDING -VEES'_BEFORE, 4U1 I ' 'I ANSTALL i� WEED" -CbNTROE-, I � I - I ,L � ' 11 I � " 'NOT 1 N ; I I , ER., Pfd - H� _% �BARRI Pt ,AGAINST, TRUNK$� ORz STEMS"�,.', FINISH. __ - I 1 - � q � - 1� f� � � 'LEVEL WITH, ADJACENT � FINISH'-i'GRADES., � I - I _ ; ,� - - _1 GRADES.. - �, i - - � . ___ - f 41 � � . --, �BERMS'-_-�� BERMS, SHALL, BE-` CONSTRUCTED OF. INDIGENOU!5, SOIL," AND" F 141- _,. , - I "' '- '- "' ' - " _ - - '_ -'- �. 1. I - 0 1 . � , I - P�WACTED��,--T ,:25%- I.' L . 11-1-1 I'll 1 2 I � - I E`' -, ,6,, ��F�LANtit4b':--�,�,"OL�ANTS-'8HALL tt',_-�ET.' PLU'-MB,,L ' - THL _:qAME!_"GRAD Af , I ' _ --- I :� 1-1 : I AT, i, ,�, ,- - I I � , � I -1 �, � I . I I - �, . __L �-W H I c H -'IL"-�- THEY E`Y_�_ HAVE. G'R&NN'� BEST"'SIDE:' ' FACING �PRIME� '.VISIBILITY.': � - 1, � . � - E I- - � Ts 'OF�-, - I , E- Di _ ! "I ,AND THOROUGHLY,-'WATERE IN ;TO, -ANY PotKE AIR.-I 1, � I _ANY - ELIMINATE __ . - __ I _. � . I I � , -1 - � 11 - 11 - � 'L - � � 1, _ _T f, , ; �,� � � - - E R, ��,,'R E T NTION,",DiS , , , . I I '� ;-SEF, IN 'A .:WKI - H tp` iN` . I , ;.-.,�'TREES'.' TREES .S'HALL�, BE,, E' I I I I : I ; I � ,� ., I � DEPTH'-' AND' EQUAL- IN; bEAMETER� 10 -THE "ROOT'BALL ANP�,".MULC'HED' , I - - ' � TREES,,-,',,SHALL�.BE APPROPRIATEL �` GU . STAKED I � I � , YLD:,AND� �"- I � I _ �_ � ;� , - , , � ; , _ � ... - � - " � 1 '- " � , - -, _7y ' . - - � , � , , - , , - - : I I I MAINTENANCE',ALL,- MAINTENANCE SHALL, BE_THE� EIBILITY. ,OF',-TH,r ,, , , , , , - - , - - I 'L 1 " , - � _'. _ ,C,0JNTRACT,OR-_ _- - -1 , i - I � "I __ - I—- I 11 OW ER,,,; QC TAN ; NT( - 1N ER ;'. A tP ,.� �, -"'- I . ,,UNTIL' L CE � , : �_� - _ i� 1, � - Z., - LANDSCAPE'.?LANT, AND; - MATERIALS'. , LIST,, � i I � , : ,�l�,-S.,�PLANT"L,QUANTITIES�'�--HOWN ON� I - � I I I I ' - N " 11�1111- - I I I , I - - " I ; 1, Y` � ARE' - - 11 ' -`T6 ,BE,,QSW FOR' . ; _�;'QUANTITI ES, . i � , _ . I 1_1 - - " -1 L 1 � 11� ''I __ -1 I- � � . 1, � . - - , "' � , -_ �7 " ' , 4 J, �, RI G'-,,: LAN AND` AL - - -i - _ ' � "�'__1'T",i"S'i ALLI , " - - '" "--' - ' `JtW164_,'A'� `_ _'d ON �f R` 6 C TO IN, ACTIVITIES-, 4 , � , �9"� �Db N' D! � � , , , , I . 1. � PLACE_. I I '"ONLAWF , _- REMOVEl'�7VEGE-TATI(-)N--,'���BY----GRUF3BING, - i 1. - I I '. , :1 - , L �T 0, � BE`� ,U OR�jb ,,, ___ I A z � , ITS, - I - � I 1 � "� -,, POS T1 I- � �ACHNI�RY� - ' �SbLVENTS','CbNSTRUCTIONf �`�� 11 - -A. 1�i i i $61ILD-E , DEBRIS,,-,. __ - MATERIAL � � � I ' I ' - - -, I - T0 CITY` , I � .`1 'OR �OTHER ',EQUIPMENT: 6F�AN'e, X'IND',`�'WITHIN� THE`t'�DRIP'LINE &-k-TREt" I " 11 I L ,11 . ' __ 1� " 1 - ; = I � -' SITE: UNLESS "bTHERWISE"' APPRQVED�` --, OUNTY 'OR-, � '. " � .- . 'I ,,REMAIN !ON ;THE-; . BY THE�� ; � � , - � , - , . � ; ' "16;'ALLI PLANTS rIERTLIZE-0 UPON, 1, "INSTAL jION`. ' ' i -4 ;, 11 - 1�1 LA � � � I I - - :1 1, I I , 1, � I I I 1, - 1 I � i , 7 - - � I , I AMENDMENTS, AS'JPER,�iLSTANPA : I I 411!,, B,ACKFILL MIX. MIX,TOP- SOIL,, ,SOIL' I I!, _ I - L '_ , � I I - - L , I _ I - _ - � - I 11 � �' � I � I - , 11 , 'r ` SOIL CONDITION . I � z IR DE,�PRACTICE ,,FOR 'LOCALS §1 , A I I .- I - �, � 1� �' , � � -, "� k"_1 -,"" � _1 2' - 'N:,,'�' 1�--i " - � i� _. .,,,INSfALLATIO' TREES',_AND _SHRUBS! ____EXCAVATE� PITS,-,WIT �,`,-VERTICAL SIDES.'- I I - - 1, C, , - ' :CENTERS I I I I _11 AND- - I _ BOTTOM - '-'A7r --CENTL I ASSIST , - A , I - � ? , ,,WITH, BOTTOM �OF� EXCAVATION! SLIGHTLY -�RAI§Eb -' _R" TO ASSIST�-DRAIN,GE, 7 ' SLIGHTLY 1 1 " - "' I L, - - - ! � 1 1 1 f - � I , . I , I I 8 LL,,,DIAM1E7.E .,, D'�-, I I I - "' , -, -'''A- ' -, , 'EXCAVATE, � ;,.-APPROXIMATEL,�-I',7 1A_ ;-�--2'' TIMES-IA& WIDE-AS , '"'R-", AN - ! I - . - I 1 , _� - - __. - � " I 1, i� I I , ; HL'-ib _4"LLOW, - I I , - I _ _Iroc - 11 I " - ' ' , I , - - I- _11 1� I I I . � - E' 0 - "' .L MN b 6 -0�i---A-,�',SM--,ING�-L,'�YE'F�- -1 , L ;'bE PL-4ciN& 017�`,,�ROOT- BALL I k , ,,� I I 1 , Z'' - - '_ - " - , - '_ -, 1-11 � � I �, " -. - ' OP ,,ROOT -.BALL , - I It ., - � I , OOSE N � - , IARD L - SU68' OIL .. I ' l' � 4 � � ' BOTTOM: t 0 -,' E` -`� ,� ,- - " 1 PLANTING,�'SOI - I - H-1 � F EXCAVATION. ,SET ,,TREE$ , ,. . - - _ , '�' -, I— �- -,bAL'L RXLISr,�- - � , I I � I t, I- OF TOP,,`�OF I I ED',�ABOVE:-�_ - - '� _` I ' � � .' - , ' ' '!., � . - � I - I AI 'PLJMB- AND:AN_-',10ENTER -,.,PIT'-, WITH " I : � I I � - , - - ,_ , , L - ' - L N , , - 11 �Ii I . I � - CENT. -A.:'SE, , , I � '': , ,, '. � � �'AP: � - FINISH' ADES.-, PLAC&_ TTI G � LAYER, "OF COMPACTEP bAqKFIL ; , I I I 1 - 1 _1 -1,1" _,, ", - 11 - , I— - -, � __ - _ - - L " I , . " ,_ � BASKETS PARTIALLY MIX., �REMOVE BURLAP `AND B K S FROM�`_, TOPS,,---,'OF , -1 , - - - -, I I I- I � - M I'll " 1, ' LDO; N� � I LANTING'.i � SIDES, I . - �FRQ � I 6of-1- - "' , ., E, -- O'M 0 N, D E, R ,,, BALLS.` S-- - , , ,, - , , , " �i_,_` 0 S 2 � � ""o . I --' ' . � Pq�T - 1 11�7 ,- ' � I ,, li;�: 11 11 - ., , 0 � 0 , ;�� �� ,� STOdK., IF,BALL ,IS CRACREb�,,,, R�_"BR� kEN t'bEFORE-- OR `DUkkd,1' PLANTING- � 1 4 � - TAMPING: 1 7 - I I _0PERATI='PLACE-'L BACKFILL AROUND; BALL IN'� LAYERS' TAMPING: TO"'SETTLE `BA � , I I - I -- - - - - -:,;--, , BALL , , -,, � I , �_ �, I I - , , � - ' � I � I 1 � I I . . I � 1. - - Ll� TA P-,,:TOP-,'-,OF BACKF LL-,� �� '- ` V66S AND iPOCKET.S.-.-, DISH --AND M � - - , -, I � _ -- '�� %� �t � �_ , , ' I '! . b!,,:,LimiNATE_'-, -1 , I I , TO . �. i _ - - 1". -.T%,- , , - - - 1, _1�711_ � - I 1. 1'FORV',A ,,&��.INCH_,-HIGH� MOUND', , RIM,'-'�_OF_`,'THE, PIT.,i'DO;-- I CC) ; I OUND' A'I46UN6`Tkt-' �` ''� _' ` __'` A �. , AI�R " - � �� ,, __ .� , L - " ", � ; I A , NOT VER-1,", TOP ; �1 L - INCH. � , - - I 'RIM:" " _-, 1,1" -L"', - �1_ "I , - : 11 4 ": "L T P,OF ROOT BALL, , WITH " BAC K F I LL.- � I I ; � L I " ,q - ,,.,- ,,, I - _1 I'll i 1. i I - � I I , I i ; _,^�. , . I . ; 1, I I - 1.0N MT ` 1RR I _ 1-Gh-T, E -S:)):'-, I I � � - I � , I I- :� � �, 11 1 I - � �_ 1-.i','IRP%IGATION�,,,,��DESIGN,- ANU/ -;TO; -jo; SE' BY' -7 ` - I J. � - ' CSR ' � 1, - " ' � I 1.1-11, I I I— 1_ i _, �_, - -1 1.11, 7 I - I � I - � " I , =SHALL �BE� K ) ` - 6 R � RRIGAT ON ,CQ CTO - -AT -1 �-�Nb'/` I f NTRA" k.,i 'ORi-c i6l�� SYSTEM :CONSTRUCTIO1 7, ' , I 'r," " - � - - , I 8. __ " 7 _ toNtl I 11 � I I - I 1, � �ACCOI I I TH, THE� APPLICABLE' SPECI ICATIC . RACTOR,_',,TQ,',CO3O - DINATE: - j , RbAkE--,-_; W! - - - - - r )K - R -,- I I , " 4 T I ,� . " I I , - J 'i " I ' PLIcAk�,, ;� ,-. , I 'API`,--lROV'A_L, -*O'F"",-IRRI'GA'TION-----'SYS*r-EM', WITH 'itHE-�.,,OWNE�"-'�AND""ALL��, AP I L " I __ � , 'r - I I L I T I 11 I . ;1-1AUTH_0RI � PRIOR; - ,- , ,, . -GOVERNMENT P��_ �RIOR` TO t'��,'CONSTRUCTJO]N' I , - I- �", I I I -, , -�� - ... � " I ". , - - .- I I . I � -1 - I _t - ; , , T I.,_��,-� 0 - _, ' � -L _�Aj t ,- ,�t ' - ' , dWi f . I ' ' - ,1RRGA ION:','SYSTEMS '! ZE, E. E_Sl(3N ,S CH�A§ , , I CTORY� ' - - , 4 ' b" ' - . ;'IRRIGATION; " '_ - -'- - 't-H-ALL OTI'L _" .7- �b _ J _.L VqLU, -1 1. L ' 'r- A' ` � - I I � 1 � I I - L , , " ' 'IHEA'S�-��_013�`30AKER,; HOSES ,TO�i-pk , E",; DIME i,APP JCATION,,`_, ND, LQ.W_� E"P0RATION � I `� , I 11 " OVIDE' L - .THE I t, I I I - - - ICK__WI,LI" , , - MUST` , , - , ; _4 -, _ AND - ---' �,`HAV"E' rA ;�', RAIN- -`SENSOR __ btul_� -,'b'O,',S�WT--C"'H-,,",-"-WH-"- - --J-,OVERRIDE � , ' 'SENSOR 11 - - - N_ L',__ L , I - � I ' � - - - - � I I _� , - I , _.O �7 __ � -bitOLIATE' RAI FALL" HA,s",-'.1__ ' I. IRRfGATl ON ICYdL" -, OF SPRINKLER' ;SYST-E11V1*H�N'f_J% I '_ - - I -0' ' L- ' F _ I 1, 11 I I � , 1 . I 11,WATERSUP I - - DIVID AL�,P,ANTER,-_-,A LAND-,, I OdCURREIJ` ", ' - -,PLY`,SHALLB E ��-P'IP'E-[)'�:.""i-Q--"EAc'H -IN I s 'AND 1 � L� I , -1 I I , - I T - _' - - T � I '''IN,,NO. ,QASE,,�,,'-,SHALL,_:ANY PLANTED_ _VEGETATION ' BE---:MORE, THANi5`07,_FEIET . . 11 '' T � M��A WA HIOSIIJ�BIBB`. - .�' ' VELL8,", ,OP�N,"',�b�F-AC'-r-"""WkFffkL",' BODIES, , FRO "' ER SUPPLY SHALLOW ,:, ' I 1 I � I j ', t - -1 - - - 1, ) I _-, I I � --- - I I � - " � I � , - 1 I, � I - - , , I 1, " . - -� - -SHALL, -,BE USED: D � L S,.�U_A T _OR_,RECLAIMED WATER , It"UN'ES "' N, , S,,A SQURCE,-OF: � I ,( . - , VAILABLEj A 1, I -1 11 ;RECLAIMED ' ' I I.- I . ) - I , , ! �' , -, IRRIGATION;"WXIER.� i I I � I 11 I - I I . � - � "I r '3� �IT SHALL BE.,,'�THE CONTRACI"OR/IRRIGATION�"SUBCONTRACTORS-4��RESPONSIBILITY�, TO` i, .1 ' ' ' P - � I � ' AFL :. - ' ' - - GL 'T - I I , , 3T, - : - LANDSCAPED-,"iAREA -S ALL,, �13E`-�L 0, -� - ION I �:A'SURE'�--I'HAT. �,1ANO` , L '' S-',,,' - �bViDED' �WITH�`AN"'IRRLI A I . ' - I , � . I ' IES�; 1,00 �, : ;1 1� , 1 1, SY L -L I - I T - , - - - , -1 ,, � - - - I I - �11 � Stm ,"T40,'�,,SUPPL ' -�P' RCENT� �MiNWUM , - 00VERA'GE'-_.T0-;ALL._ -�'AL - REQuIRO' __ . �- I -1 I I I L � - I _ - t L " I" . ,-.� � MAY'-'�'CON.l , - I RR 1 G&I 6 W � SYST E M' ' F � N - ' � LAN DSCA�l NG: '-,',PLANT � '�:MATERIAL THE ,"I � 1, 31817�;�-,O 7, A, �, � I AUTOMATIC; L _ - _ ,�, - - ' , - '' '_ - __ , � I - ''I -, _ I - , I - OR,` UNDERGROU ,, DRIP,,`SYSTEM�,i "' - -V&,VE§- R� -,� ' ,AUTOMATIC� N6 �Y'STEM' - 0 , . - I - QUICK� C UPLIN - ' ,, , _*�- I - _. - , - - ', � 9 ' _' . P - __ t - I ; 7 t ,_W �ET OF":�'AL''L :R"-E-'-Q'Ll''�Eb-,,'LA�'NDSC-ARN�-G,--'-P'L-A,NT MA 1 � - - , - HOSE BIBBS'' ITHIN-.50 - i' F - I - I - " 1 I � `,tkIAL,':',�: LOW", ' I - - - , -Lt,,:Nb!',_IRRIGATION I—' .10 I - I �_, I 6 I - 11 - � � V - TEM -,i',SHOULD,:'BE;,, USE�D 'WHEREVER 'POS.' ,,,- . LUM�,'_,"IRR GKOON: SYS - - I 'SIB I , e ;i i 11 ' S�., Y LR, � � 11 , � . - - _' - - _, � _ _ _ _ _ _ I I I z ; - . F, ;AN T E�S` ' k _� I I ", . . , I'AL _`_ R' ' '' - _� , , , LINES_�SFI L._,�, 1�UN,"THRbUcH .THE -,.PROTECTIVE' RAIJIU O UNLESS TOOT , I � - , 1 " � � L- - ANY " I - I -,- I - _..L ' CT 1, f � ! ; I ��OTE ION' �MEASU I - ktSr"ARit, TAKEN'i L - � . 1 - I—, , � 1_' : , I I - � I I I � � _ -, � � "' , j - [ __ - --- . - - - - -, - - 1, - -.--." I - - __ _____ -1 ------- - __ ________.___�.m_.a___�___,, � I __ _1_1_ - __ -1 � - __ __ __ - ___ __ - _ - - - 1 I -1-11 ____ - - _ _____1____ -, ---- - ____. _ __ __ _______1z_ I - - � � � L I - I - - - 11 I Al - , - - __ �_ I ___ 1__1__________1 � ; ". .." � ." , ." " 5, " , I - � � - I I I— I - I __ - - -1 - � � I - I I ' THIt''DRAWING , IS- AN I L NSTRUM'ENT_ OF StRVICEAND S14ALL BEMAIN-VT �jf lfl� -TY,. Or, THE ; , .R , DRAWING. I -Z W _ - ENGINEERS AND SHALL' NOT BE REPRODUtEll,PUBLISHE '(5Ft_ W%WliM4AY �,VVT TROUT' U T' ' _-, , r , , I"- , . I , ` THE'WR17TEW CONSENT OF THEENGINEtR. ,V� II17'66110 , * I , J HED.- Q, 9 W 4! ...�-* J - .. .-, % / . N .� .. - I . V. % �_ _ - � ft .. N/ �, �--_ 1� � � I 6 , i I ; . A ., - - - I - __,_ • 1 1, , - ill I . �,, ,!: / , �_ 11 r. i :: P, * - 1, ;., : I , ►n.-Ra o6141 � R, 1_1-, - '_ - Z z : I - , _1 - 1�1 1�, " . j, - LL ... 1-4 1 1 \",-&,, 1_17-_ 41 . mA G ]��, 0 . I - tI bPlEt 'OP-THESE-) P- LANS. A- RE-' N6 " T yXI C" I 6_A" . , T g V-- . i EMBOSSED WITH THE, SIGNING ENGWEER,'��V,, � ! 11 F1_ - I - ONTINQ'�-P�_- - - I- 4� P'0P'-L�UP'1-HEAD_S, SHALL ,BE 'PROVIDED, � IN,,. ALL .,� SODDED .AND :LA * �, -�,__ ,,,_ _' '_ , :LANDSCAPED AREAS,, , , , - I - -1 11 , _ I I I INCLUDING. "ISLANDS". , 'WITI-i - CARE ,TAKEN,, IN, ,'PLACEMENT OF HEADS TO AVOID . I L ' L I I - - I - -_ . i - iVE BREAKAGE BY 'AUTOMOBILE AND 'FOOT TRAFFIC. I , - L 5. OW ... -'--"' ' 'DE, ON-SiTE WATER'SbURCE, (IRR�IGATION 'WELL) TOR USE BY' IRRIGATIO__N' '(CONTRACTOR, 'UNLESS ,OTHERWISE 'SPECIFIED. I 6.'. OWNER'� SHALL-1� PROVIDE, E--LECTRICAL,,HOOK_UP AT, k1OCATION ' PROVIDING' I - -'- HOOK_ UP . - . 11, I - ACCESSIBLE, ,SERVICING 'OF AUTO Mfflb'� TIMER'.. I _11-- 11-11 I I _-, , T. THEE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE ACCESS --UNDER - ASPHALTED I , I - -I I I - - AREA S I SUFFICIENT,,, TO O PROV ID- E`"'AC SS TO ALL ISLANDS' AND .BEDS: FROM' WATER' SOURCE, AND -AUTOMATIC ' TIMER' AND ,VALVES'.; -'THE; SITE CONTRA,COORDINATE' CTOR�SHALL AS NECESs AR YwitH THE 'I RIG ATION , CNTRACT OR TO � INSURE fkk� A LL REQUIRED' ,3LEEVING IS I N STA L L E D ' PRIOR-_70 �'ANY PAVI,IG-ACTIVlT1ES. . " , "" "' TH . ' ' Y, AND � 8'. AN, I ,ALL- ABOVE 'GRADE -PIPING AND',�OR 'O . ER_"0UTLET (H10S'E,'BIBB ETC,) I 1- - ' I - SERV(6 ;OTHER' 'POTABIL_E,�' WkrER"-sHALL_-BE IN FULL-COMPLIANICEIWITH.SBCCI, - . ' ' - " " I - '' PAINTING I I , - i CH API ijj,�& -ERENCE' OF PIPE FOR STAN DA0D; `P'LUM PLUMBING CODE C A ' ' - REF ERE . 1 '� I I _ - - � REl - I � , - I DIFFERENTION� FROM POTABLE WATER,�'ANL1�`,LABELING OF' EACH�VAUVE- AND/OR .OUTLET. I NbTIN^:`tAI0'E%" AS 'NONPOTABLE "WATER: '-- - 1 Y' , , - _ I , "WATER I "I -9. ,tIf /'d6- 0- - N,- TY'1" W A T , E" R ', MAY Y , N O T , 'B- E 'USED , F O"R IRRIGATION I WHERE I OTHER SOURCES, CE& A_ I ;',READILY AVAILABLE.: - _ _ I - T -1 - � - 1, I - .ALL,:- IRRIGATION .'THC'PUBL I iC .PoTABLE,W.ATER SUPPLY SYST . EM . , - ,, 10.- - SYSTEMS `CONNECTED�,�.'Tol I I 1z 1 I 1 S'A )NCLUDE X 'AT -THE SERVICE'' CONNECTION, .� `,H .LL� � I --BACKFLOW,,, PREVENTER - r_ I - I- - I -, - I I - .1 I -1' 't I . I I I I - I _t 'ALL IRRIGATION_ SYSTEMS -SHAL , - I AS 10 ! ' 4- - I .IL 'BE-.. INStALLtb SO '' " MINIMIZE-: SPRAY UPON' 11 H�` I -sib 1 ANY, IMOERVIOUS SURFACE, :SUCH -�AS ,� ItWALK5 AND PAVED AREAS. . 11 -. - - - 1, �, 1. ,_ I I I I " "I - F - - I - TR, EE-�, -,-&, - S14R U B, PLAT~! T.I N,G'__ ,1D ErT-AI'L5.-:, I _-, 11 - - I - I I I 1'. THIE'' ROO1 I*- 'MASS-" FORM OF' EACH tTREE �PR�bPOSED FOR' INSTALLATION, ION, SHALL, BE . ' - I � _BALLLb-,�'OR� 8URLAPPED. BARE- ROOT TREES ARE NOT'ACCEPTABLE.'ALL I r I ,1� ,I ' '- __ - V ,--NON 510 DEGRADABLE, WRAPPINGS WILL :ESE; REMO.ED AND �'BURLAP WILL BE FOLDED , - _. I I I I , I - , cE:,WATER ., ABSORPTION�, IF -WIRE 'BASKETS -ARE ,USED IN`," _1 - 11 -0 10JUNCTION,_1 ' � � - I ' , I 1C ' - , WIT4 BALLED' AND' D APPED TREES, ,THE,.'FIRST, FEW", ROWS OF, EACH, - I .BASKET1_`S_HALL_-8'E 'REMOVED AT THE TIME-'OF INSTALLATION.- • 1 .,SUPPORTIN.*G APPARATUS, SHALL, ESE, ,'REMOVED- AFTER- I COMPLETE 11 GRbWING sc-:AsbN.,. ALSO " THE, FLEXIBLE, ATFA,CHMENTS -SHALL BE'USED WH'ERE" SUPPORT, "WIRES ARE ,WRAPPED'AROUND TREE TRUNKS/STEMS- I "WIRE'S - I I TO'__P',RtVENT,, cAmBiAL ,DAMAGE.' ' '" I I , � 1 -1 - - . Z�. PLANTING- HOLES ASSOCIATED WITH'PROPOSED' TREES MU,7 BE '_,LOPED ,. 11 " - I .- - 1, ' 9 S ` Of_ , ''(4 , 'CO PACT ED) 'AND A_'MINIMUM_-O, , I : , 5` � M _' I 1 11 ,i_ I - I - . � F 11 . - I -, I THAN ll , ��1�8;24, INCHES'WIDER , I I I ' ' I - I 1� , THEI� -',DIAMETER ,OF THE', ROOT., BALL. TREES SHALL BE INSTALLED SUCH 13HAT''THE', TOP ,`-_017,, 71!E�' ROOT MASS IS LEVEL::;. THE OF �' 1' ' , - " tA - G' ' CAF-, 'TREE&"3'HOU'LIJ BE�_ INSTALLED,,1, 5 .INCHES I HOLE. THE ? NTIN H . I � L " __ T - "' � I - ,-MbVt-��LG' ' ' ' __� ITES' CON - LAY A��2� _�3, INCH ,-LAYER OF RADE�_ ON��S_l JAINING' C " . ' I I ,O_RGANIC-',,`EMULCH_ MUST'' ALSO, 'BE_,PLAC,W_,`OVER. , t,ENTIRE SURFACE - y - , , - , , , - I I - THE I I I . , � -,OF, - EACH 'PLANTING' HOLE. TO PRLEVENT_-.,L FU N GAL, INFECTION' MULCH ' ' I - SHOUL6 �8E PULLED- BACK A FEW, INCHES, FROM THE'-BASE OF EACH TREE. _ - I - . 4�.11F,',ON' SITE '--SOIL C'O_NDITIO - NS L -, ARE sucH"'THAT SOIL, �AMENDMENTS' - ""' , - I � I , - I I I , L1111' PE,.- NECESSARY, 1 ' I HE- PLANTING, I MU . ST, ,dNCLUDE - - SOIL MIXTURE' L yl 14 ' L �' I THRF0__U` _T' ', 'NTIRE, -, - _GHOU '�� HE, I- -�_,81ECTION�,&, EACH' PLANTER AREA TO A - _3 , - I " DE I DEVELOP'MENT,OF PROPOSED PLANT . T��,,�-'CQNSISTENT: WITH"THL' Roof_� , _- - _, � , P , MATERIAL. I PLAN -, ,-,- , ITO , - _ _ WITHIN � ` 5., - , __ § I ADJACENT- TO? OR, --_- , VEH _ IC , U , LAR, �USE AREAS _ ', ' M , UST - -' ' - ' - ' - -OR ANY I BE, C(*ST� LJMEROCK�AsPHALT, -CONCRETE I - , � - �, 1 0"tH.E'R-,.;'OB'S'TRUCTIONS -,DO', NOT EXTEND,' UNDER, 'THE � THE . . I I , ;-_ _� ,:5URFACE ,INTO' I �'PLANTflq'G'.AkEAS._ ' . - � I I - -1 - , I - - I � . . 6,. THE. PR'ACTICE, OF TREE TRUNK, YVRAPPING -AN - D, ' 'THE,- APPLICATION, OF PAINTS /TAri'ON1-0 ,'PRUNED' TREE BRANCHES IS NOT RECOMMENDED I I - 11 BY THE SOCIETY OF', ARBORICULTURAL. I - - 11 - - I . - , - I - 7, , ,PLEASE - NOTE ,,TH- A 1 ,T ` H- 7E U SEI "OF I FERTILIZERS - LURING ,I ',PL A: - N T ' INSTA1AfibN_ I NOT;APPROVED.- SCIENTIFIC -EVIDENCE 'I NDIC A, TES _ I THAT FERTIL17A ION (SPE IFICAL LY'' •THE', AP PLICATION OF 'NITROGEN ) TO 0 I EES/SHRUBS ,WITHIN THE FIRST GROWING -SEASON INHIBITS: R OOI T I I ,e t, CROWN _SPREAD�' ,, - - - f � I,' f � 1 ,_ _____1 - - I.- I - - ' ' . ' NoTE: , ALL TREE StAk ' 8 -AND -SUPPORT WIRES . - - WILL. -BE' ' REMOVEP°_AFTERl COMPLETE, I'll e'-�-, 'GROWING_11� SEASON_ � 'W - 1, , , 1, x (W_�A' A I I , - - - -_ It > - I , . �_, ,- I _:�V Remove Dead an& Injured'- _�' I .; I - . ,,j1f`\_ ao 6- � I i ,I -1 L, - , I - I � � I- 3" _ M1 . _ I , r Twigs, Trim, Na N Leaders,, __� I , -h 0go - Refain'-Nabural Shape.-� - �� - - - , C nlmurn�4ulc Layer r I _� � -1 - -, 0000 � �, I ''I - I I . "I I 11 0 I , 1 - -Reinforced . 1. - I ; - 11 - - 3 11: " - '- L B , _,r, Rubber !Hose' - - __ " , 'foo,o 1� I - I - , - - I I , - Gypress., ark -1 I � - , I , __ . 0 .� r I Mulch i,24` Around ,Sfir'ub` §tdkes {3- Pee - , . , I I _-, - 3,L_ 12 G ie- Galvanized -Wires , . I I I I 0'I w - � 11 I ,� I , 1. q A I lo, Be buried 3Tte 0, 1: � � Spaced.. "'12003round Tred arid' , I , t Existing Grade _�_ ,j I -1 r Grade Minimum At r45� Angle- - I � -1 , I - � , --so , - , I I At'LA' 4.5* Angle - I Water,'Rete'ritioni I � _�� �� ,, , . - : I I . � , - _ - I - - 1-11 - I . � - - - I � - I I . I ,-- I 11 6" EartK �Sbil,'Sbucer, 1 _7 - 1-1 _� � 1` 3', DIA. - L-- , � - - I `11 _,___�. I - __ - - - ' - _' 11 �� 11 e I Rem 0ivd, Ci6ntainer� � I - I i ) I )Y. ", . �, , i -,-, , " , - � I., ,X I I . I I Trom Rdootball I I - I " -1 - , I I . _' ' _- I �_ - - - ____ I -1 __ -, - Y-Soucer Rim - - _, T � "" , 7 . - ') Nl...w......_.._._.. - Ri , __ �,', . '' � 'r . Planting— rSoil , Mixture I I � � -1 I ____ -.-,. I I 4'!,ri, , ': " , I - - " , 61..� I .. , . ` "��__ ' __ - I �.p I - ., - , � , , �� _ 11 '- I L � ,;�, I ,, � -1 - � I - I 11 � 11 ` 'K.. � � . I- . I'll, , 11 .-I _ - - I --- - - , _ I 1 I � - . - fi�� 1 ____--��_,�, Remove . To - , , I ,d, Wire � From: " , 19 ': Treei, Sall , I I - I " . , I f Existing ,.Soil� '��, � , p 1/3 OF Bur ap ,An - � I I - 11 , ,� - , I - " � 11 , I � Vertical Excavation , - ..14 �� � ',, � .1. h __ - , -1 I I ". - � , TV, , " Pjar"jng.� Soil Mixture __ - - - �_-`: I - � - __ - __ � q - I - I . 1� I � � I (Provide .1 /3 CU YD For Each' Tee. Mini.)'; " I - - " �� 1 _6 � , I I I - I ' VAMES , . I I TING DETAIL 1 � N.T.S. TREE STAKING & PLANTING' ,DETAIL 1�� I ,IN, T. S w - � . - - - - - 1: -1 - - . I - L - I LL - I � - - I - I IL - , I � r - - , I , ' NOTE. ALL TREE STARES AND -SUPPORT ' WIRE I ' "I -1 WILL BE REMOVED AFTER I COMPLETE' � I I - , 5' Layers: Burlap - ' I GROWING SEASON, - - , (Wrap, At Ploi.nt,Of Support) , - __ I � � � r I Wire Tie; � '- " - -, *I . I I I 1 2" W_4 Wood Brace (3) 1 - , , , I I - � _�.� I , . � - iSoll Saucer 7- Lj - - � 2' Wood, Stake �_ (3) I/ I eight' j.h :Grade ,� ' 11 I Fin rode ' I Of ,Trunk, ' I I ' - I I - I 41IN I L - - I - �� --III - __ I Hd , I I -11 1. � .,--, . r I , - - I- Soil mixture " I I . Soil &;iting l L TYPICAL _STAKING' ,F0R,",_PALMS _N.T:S. � THEE &, SNRUB ?LfiNTING R WP : , - _ -, I - � � - � I;) c! , �1\1 � -1_� , I ', - i,,�� --I � 1.. � I I' 11, 1 r I I , A I , � " � _4 I�, - �� I � � I 11 I It , I �� I , 1' r 7 � - - 11 t- __ - _ r fULL.: ' DRIPLINE I I� - - - - ; -. � - )", ,9_-�, , L , I I I , �, , - � 1 ,I - , 1 ". I- , l ��it __ �� - - - I- "� X -4" Horilzonial Wood, � , I Member, , - ' I I I -, I-- : I , 1 ; I 1; L , I I I -1 Pq -- .' - " - __ , - r -, N E S � ",, r, -- L-_ I " �, L, - AND, � I - � �`; -SPECI MEN 1VE_E�-_-,,,' , __ � - �,� ---- _. 1, - , , I I - I , . i I I � - I -, L\. jL. Y ;.� _1, , �' � 11,� � . ';L Lt, _L 1 4 , I : I 1, : - , ,�_ '. I : __ --- � - � I , ,r, rl " � _ , I �, 4a. - , � , - I , , r �, - - . I'll" , I _1� . � r _K 11, i , t-f i I I I . � . � I � I I I I t I . I - I- � - � , I , � ,� - � -1 i I r I r I I I 11 ,� ; li I m -1 I I "'I � � 1� -1 I I _ r , _- ' ; L ' 1, I � I , , � I _ I , ,_ :11; r , _X � , - I � I ! I � A '.,- -4`2"& Verflcd!, ,St,lakes, , , � I ". , , ,-''- - , I I � I .1� I'i I �15 "' 8` MAX-- - � � - 11 I � " -11 :I; . I L I - I FULL DROL-INE, I � 1. .0 - - 171t_ - _____ _j �_____ , , - � P-C i _., _1 - _____,]1, - I - I " ° 1111 'WOO ' D FENCE'' BARRICADES ARE TO BE PLACED' THE I !FULL DRIPLINE, OF = HARDWOOD AND PINE, TREES ' - ' , 1 . I r _. :-_,_ , , , I "' -, -, AND kE'P'T'- -MAINTAINED DURING CONSTRUCTION PROTECTIVE j BARRIER DETAIL - I � - - - - , N,.S_'�- -, 11 TREE . BARRICADE - - � DETAIL - I , . MUST REMAIN MIA' REWIRED- TREE 'BARRICADE AND, �EROSION CONTROL MEASURES . - ' I -, _ , - - -, , '' - �, _ I I I 'T " , I 0 O ' ' : � I MAINTAIN- - E "' I , , , " CTI N., EN � CROACHMENT "] N�_"T,0` , "OR' �" FAILURE" TO � - "I , I., � I I-, � �_ � - - , I - THES . I I -, - I � 1, I - I � I , , - " I ___ -i � . 4. ,,, _ - 11, _ " , -,- _ , I - � �, -11 .1 " �'AY` INCLUDT' `CIT,,AT,I0NS,, � ' - I , , �d- , BARRICADES WILL, �RESUL,f �]N `ENF0RCEMEN17,AQTI0W WHICH L - I- I - - - - - � 1, .! AND/0R, PERMIT REV0C/JI0'N,.. - I .1 . _1 - - I � 1. - 1, - I � TREE, B "A R'R'I'(,;A D'E" ' N . - 0TES: I - � ,__'��J� I—_ -,--.,-, _,� ____ -, �, � - - , - __ , � ", _. _,�_N6 111;._, �,�- " -- . 1 . 11,jBXRRIERS -ARE,-_T0 BE,�:ERECTED AROUND ALL TREES ,4 � DBH' A I � ATER . , i Ro�WN'. I _' -, . - ,- I 1� 1. - _ I __ I - - .. GRE - -TO' _ - M' `NEE 6- � BEFORE- - I �!�: __ � -1 - _1 ,,,, - ,THIS _' UST I DONE! CONSTRUCTIQN-�'OR' ANY' TREES_,-A ,REMOVED.,'' � I , , - � � , � � _ I L � . �� 11`�P, " , , , I - 2., BAkRlMS1_-AR -,!Tb 'REmAm� - ,, -PAVING 'A" " - tbNSTRu& - � _ARE I I 1, - IN PLACE U,NTiL,,A-LL, AN �, ,[ON 1 I - � I I 1_lr_, - ill 11. q Q I UIPM I EN I T_,_IS - , OUT, • , OF AL_ L, , ARE -!'DONE,,--AN "_ �'EAVY�i,E'_ - I tIHE,_'AREA_k`��. � .- $1 �81� � - - _- �, - - I -7 '' _� _11'11-1`:1 - � I -'FEET; OF-T E .4 � D AND, THAT,',-ARE L(.)CATED�:' ITHIN" TEN _- _i, TREES I � GREATER J, __,:4__ I -1-1 .1, � , - i -H - I � _AND SHALL BE 'PROTECTED ,BYE. -A BARRICADE., ' LOT-'UNb�k.' C6 , , , 1. .- - I 11 - _1 - I - I L - - � ,t,�,, _ �. --, __ - I _ , , I I - - , EA�, -EQUIPMENT INSIDE THE_.,OARRI'ER,,�� NLY �HAND':`-L--Abbk'� 1, - --- - ----,, _ ____. 4.- :',PLACE = N 0 H I , Q_ � , I- - I - - __: ------ - , " �_'_____- ,,, ii -�,-_--, � -- " f tj I A _. . '' . � 'D OSTS`-_I_SIDE-,,'B RRIER'�Akk _ - _ , I � I I _§f 'Q tb N '' 'AfER (AL, � OR SO-IL, � - Ek _§ -, _W - - - - _ . I 5.,-:�PLACE.�N'd-tOl R C ��'M I . " ,i - - I , i . - I I . , _11 I I I _. " - i__ I : . . ; � � ill ! � I- I ; - - bjus,"jo B 1� -'-' ' ' � -, , , I)- � " 1 C. -! , MINIMUM, R A' � E' PROTECTED: . -: [ _ I = - - t"". 11 , I E , L_ I - 4' R - I -, EV R ' '' GREATER « - - � I -, - , , , , X,- PINIE-,S--�-,FU,]--L-,?-,DRI"PLI'NE OR;, WHICH ' IS �GRE -, �, - I F ,`,, , ,,, �,,, ', , �, -I_ , , _ - - - � ' I _ L-.-''. 11 I I .� Cn ., J. i . I � I IS' I . B �.' HARDWOODS: FULL; OR 6"- It l� � . GREATER'. I - I " I C�l I L-, -J , A Co. V " � ., � 1 7. `:METHODS OF' ERECTION .SEE! DIAGRAM): I " "' LU t" -11 � � I—' I - I - _11,- I - . , - , - I - I , � - , , ; I �_'_LUMBER,'. ` ,,-� -_ � A MIN., HEIGHT "OF -UPRIGHTS'.4' :AND,'-NO 'LESS, THAN:, 2�' _�2�;! - -, . I A. - . L - I � I- _ I I 1 - � I � , . . - � I I—, _ , - - _ , �!I' _ I .- HAVE _ I � ' ' ' -1 1 - I �____�.� � B.': UPRIG �SHOULD` HORIZONTA1_` "RIB'BONING' 'AT'_'THE fbP `,_-�,',-_"_-__3 ,-,-a " � � - 1� , , _ "_ - I I I I I - - ___ , __ I - - -, - I � - 1, - I I _7 . 1- - -"- , �D LJ AND, 12" BELOW'ITHE TOP' I— Z _.______ - - - - ` '-"-' ' L I - E','z f H " ' ' d!;' � I- " _ " . .1 GH ` " `6 - ' ' - ' L C �- UPRII "' IT$ SH , UL(D' BE' AT �NO' _MKOR - - AN - ANTERVALS'_ k ' L - - I— -.11 - - - " ' - I - ' - i ff o D. HORIZONTAL-�-`�EMBE S. THAN"- ''!xl 2 LUMBER" , I 1� 'l o O r C%J ��- y LL2 LI.. ,r I V1 _j�WF M " 0-. - ulr- wly"a ARE 14 a A "Ov a VAU AUb 1 ? 2000 PLANNNVG DEPARTMEMI CITY OP CLEARWATER s r �z SCALE 1 " _ 20' TA LEGAL DESCRlPTfON: 0 10' 20' 20' LEGAL DESCRIPTION. -LOT to OF E.A. MARSHALL'S SUBDIVISION, ACCORDING TO THE �h MAP OR PLAT THEREOF-AS RECORDED IN PLAT ROOK 7, PAGE 17, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY ~ FLORIDA, OF WHICH PINELLAS COUNTY WAS FORMERLY A PART. �' -- 41 AND "--- 3 THE NORTH 50.15 FEET OF THE WEST 5 FEET OF A CERTAIN 3V `�' RA VACATED f0 FOOT ALLEY RUNNING ALONG THE EAST LINE OF � I ;i^ -� °�- �- _�- ,X ��� _ 4 LL -_ -5�, - - -- - -- - - -- -__ _ ._ -- - ... - - -_- - - LQT- fO- OF -E.A.- MARSHALL- S- SUBDIV/510N,- ACCORDING TO MAP- - 4 � - -- - OR PLAT THEREOF AS RECORDED /N PLAT BOOK 7, PAGE 17, �� IQ �` ' .---. ��T OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF' COUNTY, FLORIDA, 2 �� �0b ?0,3 ASW, ' ' -I' ' OF WHICH PINELLAS COUNTY WAS FORMERLY A PART Q• _0, Q Z aj X 2p' O cb• � " '.• --.� toy �I ?,�a P.K. NAIL 2 S �C. Wq� PP eb°� "~ x � °ti �o `JQ l �� ON�14 4G�GUf^� t���?i �� �� try of • °5 C 32s. 2 ° i3' OAK 17- ` x • 1 j� �+s f2" OAK o ► 9.9 J /�'' 1 �b FN AN 3i. 4, ro0, ONE STORY" ��Z �� �, FIR I /, -!- r. w r�r >' 2 . CONCRETE PP • �` 12 -':: AFAR BEN T PARKING ro 'D•O' BUILDING X ���� o, K CONO CANTERS i�' �' Zoo 95056 7 • 13".OAK ' a " LOT 10 ro •� FINISH' FLOOR "� 2� °, °'' rte)"""`` " 3ELEV.•� 33.21+ x�ti o TVVO STORY a4' �¢r. 7PS f6" PALM MAS. BUILDING I Tax. EVU °= .26' �`rR 1/2Z�, x�� , 503 ' W Lor BOTTOM FIN /SK FLOOR b 3h s ELEv.= 31.07' 1K A5, Ap 3 02 X0, I J2 � / h x 9; ' X%, ` x e��. X f0o INVERT EL. -29.29 GRATE INLET LOT 3 OF TOP EL. =31.27 LESLEY'S SUBD1WS/ON (DEED BOOK K, PC 471) x 3�' xti1 cERriFIED ra: •: . 1504 GARDEN, INC. ALDAY DONALSON -777LE AGENC,rES' OF AMERICA; INC.' -- 57EWART.7ITLE GUARANTY COMPANY • - � X31 X 3ti2 0, BEARINGS ARE BASED ON' THE SOU7N tOT LINE OF LOT 70 AS; X 3~ "S 7920'13" E", ASSUMED. EL.EVA7IONS BASED ON CITY. OF CLEARWA TER BMAH -06. ELEV• = 30187 (NGVD 29) Sur- Veyor's No t_es: :P.ofnt of Curvature 1) Property shown hereon appears to be located fn Flood Zone 'C'. per F.I.R.M. No. 125096 OOORD Dated PC, `` t'D) :�� 8- 18 -91. This surveyor makes no guarantees as. to the accuracy of the above Inlbrr»otion.. Laval F.E.M.A. agent pT -Point of. Tangency (LLso) ;Qes�ption should be contacted for verification. p rPo;nt of Rewrae CUlvoture C) :Calculation p� :Point of''Carppound Curvntuie F :Field Measured 2) No underground utilities, underground encroachments or building foundations wer+t measured or located as PP) -point of Intersection () part of this survey. Trees and shrubs were not located unless otherwise shown. :Plot w. c. :Witness Corner 3) This survey was conducted without • the benefit of an abstract of tiffs, therefore them :may be other SLR. ,Set Plat C��ped Iron Rod 1 e2' Sec. :Section easements, rights of way, setback lines, agreements, resermtlons, restrIctfons or other similar matters of public Twp. :Township record, not shown hereon. 01H :Overhead ,4) Unless oths rwlse noted, distances shown hereon refer to plat and- field measurements. FIR :Found Iran' Red �, :Cgnterifne 5). Re• use of this survey for purposes other than it was Intended without written veriReatlan, will be the RP :Found' Iran Pipe A/C Air Conditioner re -users sole risk and without IlabUlty to the surveyor. Nothing herein shall be construed to convey any rights = TIP :Found Pinched Iron Pipe - 0 A :overall or benefits to anyone other then those to whom thfs survey was arigfnally cm piled, 4'0.M. :Found Concrete Monument 01A :Concre#s AGM. :Set Concrete. Monument p'D A 'PT D Le SA .MH A.P.O. A Part Of r?'` ' „�j1S �,$d,/ PSEf DISK :Set P -K Nall & Disk LB&962 Oj 7BM :Temporary FPX •Found P -K Nall & Disk :FND . R SPK :Found, Rallrood dsrA •Spike Benchmark SMEYNG AM fiM, :No Comer Found 'a Set BY : Benchmork r ; :Permanent Reference Monument COW' -. :Covered .1406 W. UIVE&UGH AVC Tampa, f7 33612 :Range MAS. : Masgnry' 1py� 0 .• Phone (813) 93 -1960 .Fax (813) 933 -9446 ! RAY :Right of Way RES :Residence = - -. .* - :Wood Fence (WO P.B. :Plat Book Certificate of Authorization "L. B. #6962 - :Chain Unk Fence: (CIF) PG . page SURVEYOR'S CER77F_ICA�TF P.O.B. : Point of Beginning Pp :Power Pole P.CLG :Point of Commencement' I hereby certify that the surety represented hereon meets the regrikements of 69aapter tthe s1 a, f7oNdo TYF: Typical AdminlstratIve code puraaant to Chapter 472:027 of the Florida Statufes. Unless It bears the slgnatura and AE. :Pool Equipment RLS ,Registered Lana the anginal raised •seal of this Florida i(censed„ srrrmyor and stopper this drawing, swch, prof -or me . Is for . Surveyor infarmollonal ortl and Is not ic/i Field ct st Set 04WO L• IN A$Ar 5265 a- • Date: -_ - MARK JOHNSYIN, P.,SAl. 6572 Sfgncture Date' 3`Z Number: 0803 -025 x 31 2. 50' © i 2.00' y 640CFH W M� P ❑ND LAYOUT Then, Volume Required = 640 CF 0 0 Lo RETENTION POND CALCULATIONS Pond Recovery Z Z V Z 35.00' Site Area: 7720 SF co LLj Wn w M ® Existing Impervious Area: 5262 SF Proposed Basin Area: 5630 SF EL 29 75 ( =) z u ~ z a of Volume Provided = � � Recovery = (640/1650) x 24 = 9.37 Hrs. < 36 Hrs. z z Oo E4 ^mss= W W 0) 0.'. -15.00 - ::�'f ���e tetr• -« - , , PROJECT to - VOLUME PROVIDED BY RETENTION AREA OR BY - Z Top Area: 37'X 13' @ EL. 29.75' W �r 12.00' Bottom Area: 15'X 2' @ EL. 27.25' U) \ I Depth 25 Q Note: @ Table Seasonal High ).00' EL. 0.75(DRI Field Test) }Volume Provided = 2.6'X (37'x13' + 15'x2') / 2 A' = 640 CF Cpre. = (0.9/2) ((5262 + (0.2x2458)) / 7720 = 0.37 z Cpost. _ (0.9) ((5630 + 481 + (0.2x2090)) / 7720 0 J �, = 0.76 I.._. J a M AC = 0.76 - 0.37 = 0.39 0 :C 2 O a) a Rain Intensity (25 yr.) = 3.6 in /hr J W _ Q = (0.39 x 3.6 x 5630) / 43560 = 0.18 CF /S I-- Q 1z a 640CFH W M� P ❑ND LAYOUT Then, Volume Required = 640 CF 0 0 Lo /� 0 N Pond Recovery Z Z Avg. Infiltration rate based on the DIRT test = 110 ft/d R R 5 c Using Factor of Safety of 2 W co TOP O F BANK U w M Volume Pond can handle in 24 hrs. = (110/2) (15'x2') Z �� EL 29 75 ( (a rn¢ Volume Provided = � � Recovery = (640/1650) x 24 = 9.37 Hrs. < 36 Hrs. z z Oo E4 ^mss= W W 0) 0.'. -15.00 - ::�'f ���e tetr• -« - , , PROJECT to - ' ♦ • • O OR BY - SECTION A A hf,.. a,a .4 ��.�� • • AT - �i ";S• fir+ `•../EL�'% ` F,, SHEET NUMBER l Nv �., . S -1 Ur° '� ' �•', h' Q•i