The URL can be used to link to this page

FLD2008-12034FLD21u- 20 2034 KENDALLST AMBIANCE CANNER OF REC;U" :1N v 1 Ll� 11 ATLA S # 258A ZONING: T LAND USE: RFH 12/01 /20 RECEIVED: 08 � INCOMPLETE: Ov COMPLETE: E MAPS: PHOTOS: STAFF REPORT: DRC . 05 i 09 CDB : CLWCoverSheet X. 0 0 CDB Meeting Date: June 16, 2009 Case Numbers: FLD2008 -12034 (Related to DVA2008- 00003) Agenda Item: D.1. (Related to E.1.) Owner /Applicant: Panorama on Clearwater Beach, LLC and Evangeline P. Samarkos, as Trustee of the Evangeline P. Samarkos Revocable Trust UAD 3/27/06, Michael A. Samarkos, Victoria Harkey 106 Midway Island, Clearwater Beach, FL 33767 -2313 Representative: Ed Hooper, Consus Group, LLC Address: 20 Kendall Street CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT GENERAL INFORMATION: REQUEST: (1) Flexible Development approval to permit an 88 -room overnight accommodation use in the Tourist (T) District with a reduction to lot width along Kendall Street from 150 feet to 100 feet (south side), a reduction to the front (south) setback from 15 feet to 10.8 feet (to proposed building) and zero feet (to proposed sidewalk), a reduction to the front (north) setback from 15 feet to 10 feet (to proposed building) and zero feet (to proposed pavement), a reduction to the side (west) setback from 10 feet to five feet (to proposed building) and zero feet (to proposed pavement), a reduction to the side (east) setback from 10 feet to five feet (to proposed building), a reduction to the rear (south) setback from 20 feet to five feet (to proposed building), and an increase to the building height from 35 feet to 72 feet (to top of roof deck) and 86.5 feet (to elevator equipment), under the provisions of Community Development Code (CDC) Section 2- 803.I, and approval of a two -year development order; and (2) Increase of the permitted density by the allocation of 58 overnight accommodation units from the Hotel Density Reserve created pursuant to Beach by Design. CURRENT ZONING: Tourist (T) District CURRENT FUTURE LAND USE CATEGORY: Resort Facilities High (RFH) BEACH BY DESIGN CHARACTER DISTRICT: Old Florida Community Development Board — June 16, 2009 FLD2008 -12034 —Page 1 of 11 0 0 PROPERTY USE: Current Use: Detached dwelling and vacant land Proposed Use: Overnight accommodation use of a total of 88 rooms (150 rooms /acre on total site, including the allocation of 58 units from the Hotel Density Reserve) and approximately 1,482 square feet (1.07 FAR on total site) of amenities accessory to the hotel at a height of 72 feet (to roof deck) and 86.5 feet (to elevator equipment). EXISTING North: Tourist (T) District & Open Space /Recreation (OS/R) SURROUNDING District ZONING AND USES: City parking lot and Attached Dwellings South: Tourist (T) District Overnight accommodations and Automobile service East: Tourist (T) District Restaurant, Retail sales & services & Attached Dwellings West: Open. Space/Recreation (OS/R) District City parking lot ANALYSIS: Site Location and Existing Conditions: The 0.60 acres is located between the south side of Avalon Street and the north side of Kendall Street approximately 150 feet west of Mandalay Avenue. The site is comprised of eight parcels. The eastern parcel on the north side of Kendall Street currently is developed with a detached dwelling with the remaining seven parcels being vacant. On April 19, 2005 the Community Development Board approved Ambiance on White Sands (FLD2005- 01007), a 15 -unit condominium project to be constructed on seven of the eight subject parcels with setback reductions and a height increase. Due to changes in the real estate market following the approval, the proposed project was not marketable and the development approvals expired. To the west on the Gulf of Mexico a City surface parking lot exists. The Sand Dollar Vacation rentals and another City surface parking lot are located to the north of subject property. A restaurant, office and retail use with dwellings above exists to the east of the subject site. The Palm Pavilion Inn and a metal storage building are located to the south of the subject property. All prior uses on this property have been demolished except for the detached dwelling on the newly acquired parcel. Development Proposal: The proposal is to construct an 88 -unit overnight accommodation use at a density of 150 units /acre, which includes the allocation of 58 units from the Hotel Density Reserve under Beach Community Development Board — June 16, 2009 FLD2008 -12034 — Page 2 of 11 0 9 by Design. This is the second hotel to be placed on the Community Development Board agenda since the amendment of Beach by Design in July 2008 creating the Hotel Density Reserve as a means to encourage the construction of new mid -size, mid -priced hotels on the beach in response to the loss of hotel rooms since 2002. Also on this CDB agenda is a companion Development Agreement (DVA2009- 00003) that must be approved by City Council, which provides for the allocation of the 58 units from the Hotel Density Reserve. This Development Agreement provides for mandatory evacuation/closure of the hotel in the event of the posting of a hurricane watch including Clearwater Beach by the National Hurricane Center, which also complies with Beach by Design criteria. This proposal complies with the Beach by Design criteria to access all rooms through a lobby and internal corridors. The hotel is proposed on a 0.60 -acre parcel located between Avalon Street and Kendall Street in the Beach by Design "Old Florida" Character District. The hotel is proposed at a height of 72 feet from the Base Flood Elevation (BFE) to the roof deck. The first three levels of the hotel will provide a total of 94 valet only parking spaces, with driveway access on Kendall Street. There is an entry lobby on the ground floor providing access to the elevators. The main lobby and registration desk is located on the fourth floor, along with the respective hotel offices and hotel pool. The fourth floor also provides amenities for the hotel guests of approximately 1,482 total square feet (meeting room, exercise room and lounge/bar) and eight hotel rooms. The fifth floor provides 25 hotel rooms. Floors 6 — 8 provide both hotel rooms and fractional share units. The sixth floor provides 15 hotel rooms and four fractional share units, and the seventh and eighth floors provide 13 hotel rooms and five fractional share units each. All parking garage levels will be screened with decorative black perforated metal panels. Balconies are provided for 44 guest rooms with the balance not having balconies. The main exterior colors of the building are a light blue (CL 2251W) and a light beige (CLW 1027W). Discussions have taken place regarding alternate paint colors, should alternates be chosen the colors will be reviewed and approved by the Planning Department during the building permit process. Spanish tile roofs are proposed above the balconies on the eighth floor guest rooms along with the elevator equipment room roof. Other architectural features include copper cap flashing, EIFS moulding and "eyebrows ", aluminum railings and impact rated spandrel glass. The building is proposed to be set back 10.8 feet on Kendall Street and 10 feet on Avalon Street. Setbacks of five feet to the building are proposed on the west, east and south (side) property lines. The proposal also includes a 10 foot wide offset, five feet deep on both the north and west fagade to break up each of those planes of the building as required by the Beach by Design guidelines. Both the north and south building facades, which front on streets, step back 15 feet at 35 feet above base flood elevation as required by the Beach by Design guidelines. This results in floors 6 — 8 being set back 25 feet on the north and 25.8 feet on the south. The building is proposed to be 72 feet above base flood elevation with the elevator enclosure, 86.5 feet above base flood elevation. The applicant is requesting a two -year development order due to market conditions. Community Development Code (CDC) Section 4 -407 specifies that an application for a building permit must be submitted within one year of the date the CDB approves the project, unless otherwise specified under this approval. Community Development Board — June 16, 2009 FLD2008 -12034 — Page 3 of 11 0 0 Density: Pursuant to the Countywide Future Land Use Plan and CDC Section 2- 801.1, the maximum density for properties with a designation of Resort Facilities High is 50 overnight accommodation units per acre. Based on the 0.60 overall acres zoned Tourist District, a maximum of 30 overnight accommodation units are permissible under current regulations. The proposal also requests 58 hotel rooms from the Hotel Density Reserve, adopted as an amendment to Beach by Design under Ordinance 7925 -08. The overall density for this project is 150 overnight accommodation units /rooms per acre, which meets the maximum established in Beach by Design for projects that have acquired units from the Hotel Density Reserve. Impervious Surface Ratio (ISR): Pursuant to CDC Section 2- 801.1, the maximum allowable I.S.R. is 0.95. The overall proposed I.S.R. is 0.83, which is consistent with the Code provisions. Minimum Lot Area and Width: Pursuant to CDC Table 2 -803, the minimum lot area for overnight accommodations can range between 10,000 — 20,000 square feet. The overall existing site is 26,076 square feet of lot area. Pursuant to the same Table, the minimum lot width for overnight accommodations can range between 100 — 150 feet. For the northern portion of the site, the lot width along Avalon Street is approximately 200 feet and along Kendall Street the lot width is 100 feet. The lot width reduction on Kendall Street does not produce a building that is out of scale with existing buildings in the immediate vicinity. The existing two -story six unit motel to the southeast is approximately two feet from the west property line and 3.8 feet from the north property line. The existing building to the east appears to have 100 percent building coverage. The proposal is consistent with these Code provisions. Minimum Setbacks: Pursuant to CDC Table 2 -803, the minimum front setback for overnight accommodations can range between 0 — 15 feet, the minimum rear setback can range between 0 — 20 feet and the minimum side setback can range between 0 — 10 feet. In addition, Section II.A.2.and 4 Beach by Design "Old Florida ", requires a front setback of 15 feet and rear /side setbacks of 10 feet. The above referenced sections of Beach by Design also allow a maximum setback reduction of five feet if the decreased setback results in an improved site plan, landscaping areas in excess of the minimum required and/or improved design and appearance and a minimum five foot unobstructed access is provided along the entire side setback to ensure that unimpaired access to mechanical features of the building is maintained. The proposal includes a reduction to the front (south) setback from 15 feet to 10.8 feet (to proposed building) and zero feet (to proposed sidewalk), a reduction to the front (north) setback from 15 feet to 10 feet (to proposed building) and zero feet (to proposed pavement), a reduction to the side (west) setback from 10 feet to five feet (to proposed building) and zero feet (to proposed pavement), a reduction to the side (east) setback from 10 feet to five feet (to proposed building) and a reduction to the rear (south) setback from 10 feet to five feet (to proposed building). With regard to the proposed development, the building will be set back 10.8 feet and 10 feet from the Kendall Street property line and Avalon Street property line respectively. While the Community Development Code does not require perimeter landscape buffers in the Tourist (T) District, Section II.A.6 Beach by Design "Old Florida" requires a 10 foot landscape buffer along the street frontage of all properties. The Kendall Street frontage will have a 10.8 foot landscape buffer and the Avalon Street frontage will have a 10 foot landscape buffer meeting code Community Development Board — June 16, 2009 FLD2008 -12034 — Page 4 of 1 l 0 requirements. The building will be set back five feet from all side and rear property lines. All side and rear setbacks have been generously landscaped thereby providing areas in excess of the minimum required. The side (east) setback will also have the required five feet of unobstructed access to mechanical features. The west side is adjacent to a City parking lot on the Gulf of Mexico and set back five feet from the property line. The east side (northern most) is adjacent to a two story development consisting of a restaurant, office, retail and attached dwellings and is set back five feet from the property line. It is noted that the adjacent two story development on the east is at a zero setback. The east side (southern most) is adjacent to a two story motel and is set back five feet from the property line. Finally the south (rear) is adjacent to a one story building and is set back five feet from the property line. All proposed side and rear setbacks are within the flexibility range. Minimum Stepbacks: Section II.A.3. Beach by Design "Old Florida" requires a building stepback (horizontal shifting of the building massing towards the center) on the front side of the building. The required ratio is one foot of stepback for every two feet of building height above 35 feet. Similar to the setback reduction provisions above, the stepback may be decreased a maximum of five feet. The stepback requirement for this proposal is 18.5 feet on both building fronts. On both Kendall Street and Avalon Street the building steps in 15 feet; thereby meeting the reduced stepback requirement of 13.5 feet. Maximum Building Height: This site is located within the Old Florida character district of Beach by Design, which allows a maximum height of 75 feet for overnight accommodations. Beach by Design "Old Florida" is an area of transition between resort uses to low intensity residential neighborhoods. The southern end of "Old Florida" is bound by Rockaway Street and the northern end is bound by Acacia Street. Beach by Design supports the development of new overnight accommodations and attached dwellings along with limited retail and commercial uses on Mandalay Avenue. While the subject properties proposed of height of 72 feet (as measured from base flood elevation) is close to the maximum height it is appropriate as it is located just north of Rockaway Street adjacent to other resort uses. It is envisioned that the district will transition from the greater height north of Rockaway Street to the lower heights near Acacia Street. Minimum Off - Street Parking: Pursuant to CDC Table 2 -803, the minimum required parking for overnight accommodations is one parking space per room, or a minimum of 88 parking spaces. The proposal includes constructing a total of 94 parking spaces. From an amenities accessory to the hotel standpoint, the proposal includes a meeting room of approximately 740 square feet, an exercise room of approximately 392 square feet and a lounge/bar of approximately 350 square feet, or a total of approximately 1,482 square feet. With such minimal amenities, the provided parking appears adequate for both hotel guests and employees. Mechanical Equipment: Pursuant to CDC Section 3- 201.D.1, all outside mechanical equipment must be screened so as not to be visible from public streets and/or abutting properties. There will be mechanical equipment located on top of the flat roof of the building for the common areas of the building. The parapets surrounding the roof are 42 inches above the roof providing adequate screening. Community Development Board — June 16, 2009 FLD2008 -12034 — Page 5 of 11 Sight Visibility Triangles: Pursuant to CDC Section 3- 904.A, to minimize hazards at the driveways, no structures or landscaping may be installed which will obstruct views at a level between 30 inches above grade and eight feet above grade within 20 -foot sight visibility triangles. The hotel building is proposed within the sight visibility triangles. These encroachments have been reviewed by the City's Traffic Engineering Department and been found to be acceptable, given the circumstances of this site. Shrubbery planted within the sight visibility triangles will need to be maintained to meet the Code requirements. Utilities: Pursuant to CDC Section 3 -911, for development that does not involve a subdivision, all utilities including individual distribution lines must be installed underground unless such undergrounding is not practicable. Electric and communication lines for this hotel will be installed underground on -site in compliance with this requirement. Electric panels, boxes and meters are proposed to be located on the east facade adjacent to the required five foot ingress corridor and painted the same color as the building. Landscaping Pursuant to CDC Section 3- 1202.13, there are no perimeter buffers required in the Tourist District; however as discussed previously "Old Florida" requires a 10 foot landscape buffer along the street frontages of all properties. This proposal complies with the minimum 10 foot wide buffer requirement on both Kendall Street and Avalon Street, which will be planted with palms including foxtail, washingtonia and bismark. Along with the palms will be multiple species of shrubs and groundcover. All remaining side and rear property lines have been generously. landscaped and exceed code requirements. Landscaping assists with softening and reducing building massing to both pedestrians and motorists. Solid Waste: The proposal will utilize hotel housekeeping staff to remove trash from units and transport the trash to the dumpster(s) housed in a storage room on the ground floor of the hotel. On trash days, hotel employees will place the dumpster(s) outside the building in a trash staging area for truck pickup. After dumping, hotel employees will roll the dumpster(s) back inside the building out of view. The proposal has been found to be acceptable by the City's Solid Waste Department. Additional Beach by Design Guidelines: Section VII.C.1 requires buildings with a footprint of greater than 5,000 square feet to be constructed so that no more than two of the three building dimensions in the vertical or horizontal planes are equal in length. The proposed building footprint is approximately 20,908 square feet. The project's overall horizontal plane dimensions are approximately 190 feet along Avalon Street and 90 feet along Kendall Street, while the vertical plane is approximately 95.5 feet from grade to the top of the tallest roof. Only two of these dimensions are equal; thus meeting Code requirements. Section VII.C.2 requires no plane or elevation to continue uninterrupted for greater than 100 feet without an offset of more than five feet. The north facade of the building has been designed with a linear dimension of approximately 190 feet. This elevation is interrupted in the center with an offset five feet deep by 15 feet wide. Likewise, the west facade has been designed with a linear dimension of approximately 154 feet. This elevation is interrupted in the center with an offset five feet deep by 12 feet wide. Both the south and east elevations do not exceed 100 feet. Community Development Board — June 16, 2009 FLD2008 -12034 —Page 6 of 11 0 0 Section VII.C.3 requires at least 60 percent of any elevation to be covered with windows or architectural decoration. The applicant has calculated the west elevation at 71 percent, the north elevation at 75 percent, the east elevation at 65 percent, and the south elevation at 70 percent. Section VII.CA provide that no more than 60 percent of the theoretical maximum building envelope located above 45 feet be occupied by a building. However, in those instances where an overnight accommodations use on less than two acres that has been allocated additional density via the Hotel Density Reserve, no more than 75. percent of the theoretical maximum building envelope located above 45 feet be occupied by a building. As the later is the case, the applicant has calculated the overall proposed building mass between 45 — 72 feet at 71.5 percent. Code Enforcement Analysis: There are no outstanding Code Enforcement issues. COMPLIANCE WITH STANDARDS AND CRITERIA: The following table depicts the consistency of the overnight accommodation use (hotel) with the standards as per CDC Tables 2- 801.1 and 2 -803: ' Includes 58 units /rooms allocated from the Hotel Density Reserve pursuant to Beach by Design 2 See analysis in Staff Report Community Development Board —June 16, 2009 FLD2008 -12034 —Page 7 of 11 Standard Pro osed Consistent Inconsistent Density 50 units /rooms per acre 88 units /rooms X (maximum of 30 units /rooms) (150 units /rooms per acre)' Impervious Surface 0.95 0.83 X Ratio Minimum Lot Area 10,000 — 20,000 sq. ft. 26,076 sq. ft. X Minimum Lot Width 100 — 150 feet North: X Avalon Street: 200 feet South: X2 Kendall Street: 100 feet Minimum Setbacks Front: 0 — 15 feet North: 10 feet (to building) X2 0 feet (to pavement) South: 10.8 feet (to building) X2 0 feet (to sidewalk) Side: 0 — 10 feet West: 5 feet (to building) X2 0 feet (to pavement) Rear: 0 — 20 feet East: 5 feet (to building) X2 South: 5 feet (to building) X2 Maximum Height 35 — 100 feet 72 feet (to flat roof) X2 Minimum 1.0 space per unit/room 1.06 spaces per unit/room X Off - Street Parkin 88 parking spaces) 94 parking spaces) ' Includes 58 units /rooms allocated from the Hotel Density Reserve pursuant to Beach by Design 2 See analysis in Staff Report Community Development Board —June 16, 2009 FLD2008 -12034 —Page 7 of 11 0 • COMPLIANCE WITH FLEXIBILITY CRITERIA: The following table depicts the consistency of the overnight accommodation use with the Flexibility criteria as per CDC Section 2- 803.I: Consistent I Inconsistent 1. With the exception of those properties located on Clearwater Beach, the parcel X' proposed for development shall front on but shall not involve direct access to a major arterial street unless no other means of access would be possible. 2. Height: The increased height results in an improved site plan and/or improved X design and appearance. 3. Signs: No sign of any kind is designed or located so that any portion of the sign is X' more than six feet above the finished grade of the front lot line of the parcel proposed for development unless such signage is a part of an approved comprehensive sign program. 4. Front setback: X1 a. The reduced setback shall contribute to a more active and dynamic street life; b. The reduced setback shall result in an improved site plan through the provision of a more efficient off - street parking area, and/or improved building design and appearance; and c. The reduced setback will not result in a loss of landscaped area, as those areas being diminished by the setback reduction will be compensated for in other areas through a Comprehensive Landscape Plan. 5. Side and rear setbacks: X a. The reduced setback does not prevent access to the rear of any building by emergency vehicles and /or personnel; b. The reduced setback results in an improved site plan through the provision of a more efficient off - street parking area, and/or improved building design and appearance; and c. The reduced setback will not result in a loss of landscaped area, as those areas being diminished by the setback reduction will be compensated for in other areas through a Comprehensive Landscape Plan. 6. The design of all buildings shall comply with the Tourist District site and X1 architectural design guidelines in Section 3 -501, as applicable. 7. Lot area and/or width: The reduction shall not result in a building which is out of X1 scale with existing buildings in the immediate vicinity. 8. The parcel proposed for development shall, if located within the Coastal Storm X1 Area, have a hurricane evacuation plan requiring the use close when a hurricane watch is posted. 9. A development agreement must be approved by the City Council pursuant to F.S. §§ X1 163.3221 -- 163.3243 and Community Development Code Section 4 -606 if the development proposal exceeds the base density and/or base F.A.R. established for the underlying Future Land Use designation. The development agreement shall: a. Comply with all applicable requirements of the "Rules Concerning the Administration of the Countywide Future Land Use Plan" as they pertain to alternative density/intensity, and as amended from time to time; b. Be recorded with the Clerk of the Circuit Court pursuant to F.S. § 163.3239, with a copy filed with the Property Appraiser's Office, and a copy submitted to the PPC and CPA for receipt and filing within 14 days after recording; and c. Have its development limitations memorialized in a deed restriction, which shall be recorded in the Official Records of Pinellas County prior to the issuance of any building permit for the overnight accommodations use. See analysis in Staff Report. Community Development Board —June 16, 2009 FLD2008 -12034 — Page 8 of 11 0 0 COMPLIANCE WITH GENERAL STANDARDS FOR LEVEL TWO APPROVALS: The following table depicts the consistency of the overnight accommodation use with the General Standards for Level Two Approvals as per CDC Section 3 -913: Cnncictrnt I TnrnncictP.nt 1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, X coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage development and use of X' adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons X residing or working in the neighborhood. 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. X' 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the X' immediate vicinity. 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including X' visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts on adjacent properties. I See analysis in Staff Report. SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION: The Development Review Committee (DRC) reviewed the application and supporting materials at its meeting of May 7, 2009, and deemed the development proposal to be sufficient to move forward to the Community Development Board (CDB), based upon the following findings of fact and conclusions of law: Findings of Fact: The Planning Department, having reviewed all evidence submitted by the applicant and requirements of the ' Community Development Code, finds that there is substantial competent evidence to support the following findings of fact: 1. The 0.60 acres is located between the south side of Avalon Street and the north side of Kendall Street approximately 150 west of Mandalay Avenue; 2. The site is comprised of eight parcels, two on the north side of Kendall Street and six on the south side of Avalon Street; 3. The proposal is to construct an 88 -unit overnight accommodation use at a density of 150 units /acre, which includes the allocation of 58 units from the Hotel Density Reserve under Beach by Design; 4. A companion Development Agreement (DVA2008- 00003) that must be approved by City Council is also on this CDB agenda is, providing for the allocation of the 58 units from the Hotel Density Reserve; 5. The hotel is proposed at a height of 72 feet from the Base Flood Elevation (BFE) to the roof deck; 6. The first four levels of the hotel will provide a total of 94 valet only parking spaces, with driveway access on Kendall Street; 7. The proposal includes setback reductions from all property lines; and 8. There are no outstanding Code Enforcement issues associated with the subject property. Community Development Board — June 16, 2009 FLD2008 -12034 —Page 9 of 11 0 Conclusions of Law: The Planning Department, having made the above findings of fact, reaches the following conclusions of law: 1. That the development proposal is consistent with the Standards as per Tables 2 -801.1 and 2- 803 of the Community Development Code; 2. That the development proposal is consistent with the Flexibility criteria as per Section 2- 803.I of the Community Development Code; 3. That the development proposal is consistent with the General Standards for Level Two Approvals as per Section 3 -913 of the Community Development Code; 4. That the development proposal is consistent with the Design Guidelines of Beach by Design; and 5. The proposal is compatible with the adjacent land uses. Based upon the above, the Planning Department recommends APPROVAL of the (1) Flexible Development approval to permit an 88 -room overnight accommodation use in the Tourist (T) District with a reduction to lot width along Kendall Street 150 feet to 100 feet (south side), a reduction to the front (south) setback from 15 feet to 10.8 feet (to proposed building) and zero feet (to proposed sidewalk), a reduction to the front (north) setback from 15 feet to 10 feet (to proposed building) and zero feet (to proposed pavement), a reduction to the side (west) setback from 10 feet to five feet (to proposed building) and zero feet (to proposed pavement), a reduction to the side (east) setback from 10 feet to five feet (to proposed building), a reduction to the rear (south) setback from 20 feet to five feet (to proposed building), and an increase to the building height from 35 feet to 72 feet (to top of roof deck) and 86.5 feet (to elevator equipment), under the provisions of Community Development Code (CDC) Section 2- 803.I, and approval of a two - year development order; and (2) Increase of the permitted density by the allocation of 58 overnight accommodation units from the Hotel Density Reserve created pursuant to Beach by Design with the following conditions: Conditions of Approval: 1. That approval of this Flexible Development case is subject to the approval of a Development Agreement with the City (Case DVA2008- 00003); 2. That application for a building permit to construct the approved project be submitted no later than June 16, 2011, unless time extensions are granted pursuant to CDC Section 4 -407; 3. That, prior to the issuance of any permit, a Declaration of Unity of Title be recorded in the public records; 4. That the final design and color of the buildings be consistent with the elevations approved by the CDB; 5. That the books and records pertaining to use of each hotel room be open for inspection by authorized representatives of the City, upon reasonable notice, in order to confirm compliance with the Hotel Density Reserve criteria of Beach by Design as allowed by general law; 6. That, prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy, all utility and communication lines be placed underground and electric panels and boxes be painted the same color as the building; 7. That, prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy, an easement be recorded in the public records for any encroachments on the subject property; Community Development Board — June 16, 2009 FLD2008 -12034 —Page 10 of 11 0 8. That any applicable Public Art and Design Impact Fee be paid prior to the issuance of any permits; 9. That all Parks and Recreation fees be paid prior to the issuance of any permits; and 10. That, prior to the issuance of any permit, all requirements of General Engineering, Stormwater Engineering, Traffic Engineering and the Fire Department be addressed. Prepared by Planning Department Staff: ..,C! A. Scott Kurleman, Planner III ATTACHMENTS: • Location Map • Aerial Map ❑ Zoning Map ❑ Existing Surrounding Uses Map ❑ Photographs of Site and Vicinity S.-(Planning Departmen6C D BIFLEX (FLD)Wending cases)Up for the next CDBXendall S 20 - Ambiance (T) - 616.09 CDB - SKXendall 20 Staff Report. doc Community Development Board — June 16, 2009 FLD2008 -12034 — Page 11 of 11 0 0 Resume A. Scott Kurleman 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, FL 33756 727 -562 -4553 Scott .kurleman(a,myclearwater.com PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE • Planner III • Planner II August 2008 to present June 2005 to August 2008 Regulate growth and development of the City in accordance with land resource ordinances and regulations related to community development. Landscape plan review including: conceptual, variance, and conditional use. Reviews and analyzes site plans and conducts field studies to determine the integrity of development plans and their compatibility with surroundings. Interdepartmental and zoning assistance. Respond as a City representative to citizens, City officials, and businesses concerning ordinances and regulations. Make recommendations and presentations at staff level at various review committees, boards, and meetings. • Land Resource Specialist City of Clearwater June 1996 to June 2005 Coordinates with City Legal Department to initiate legal proceedings for non - compliance with City land resource regulations. Landscape re- inspection program. Plans and directs program to ensure that plant material installed per the approved landscape plan remains in a healthy growing condition in perpetuity and restores deficient landscaped with new plant material. Certificate of Occupancy Inspection. Perform inspections with contractors, owners, and City departments to monitor the installation of required landscape material per an approved site plan. Process tree permits ensuring that regulations governing the removal criteria are followed. Provide technical tree evaluations for structural defects, hazards, proper pruning, and identification for trees on public and private properties. • Account Manager Cherry Lake Farms, IMG Enterprise, Inc. 1993-1996 Groveland, FL Supervised and managed existing territory accounts, while handling a strategic marketing plan. Planned and directed in -field inspection program for landscape architects, municipalities and private corporations. Prepared technical training modules for corporate employees and customers regarding arboricultural techniques related to trees. • Licensed Marketing Representative Allstate Insurance Company 1991-1993 Clearwater, FL Field inspections of insured structures. Policy service and account maintenance. 0 0 • Store Manager William Natorp company, Inc. 1983-1991 Cincinnati, OH Managed a team of 20 sales people and sales associates in a landscape center. Responsible for teams of employees including but not limited to payroll, budgeting, sales, store and equipment maintenance, workplace safety, and advertising. Managed outdoor staff, merchandised and cared for all outdoor products. Responsible for all indoor staff and horticultural products. EDUCATION GRADUATE — Certificate: Community Development, UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA, TAMPA, FLORIDA. Currently pursuing. BA in Business Administration, ST. LEO UNIVERSITY, ST. LEO, FLORIDA. Graduated July, 2002 Cum Laude. Major: Management AA in Business Administration, ST. PETERSBURG COLLEGE, FLORIDA. Graduated 1998. Major: Management. AS in Ornamental Horticulture, OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY, WOOSTER, Graduated 1984 Cum Laude. Major: Horticulture Technology with emphasis in Arboriculture. ISA, International Society of Arboriculture, Certified Arborist, FL -0414. Case # DVA2008 -00003 • Sign Posting Acknowledgement I hereby acknowledge receiving a notification sign to post on the subject property that is undergoing an amendment to a previously approved Development Agreement and will post the provided sign(s) on the subject property so that it (they) is (are) readable from the most significant adjacent road(s) a minimum of 10 days before the Public Hearing. Print Name Date Sign Name Public Hearing Date: CDB: 06 -16 -09 Posting Date — No Later Than: 1.1.1• CC: 07 -16 -09 07 -06 -09 Q Pianning Department 100 South Myrtle Avenue r .,. ,. :.. _. Clearwater, Florida 33756 U Telephone: 727- 562 -4567 Fax: 727- 5624865 ❑ SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION • SUBMIT 14 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION -Plans and application are required to be collated, stapled, and folded Into sets • SUBMIT FIRE PRELIMARY SITE PLAN: $200.00 ❑ SUBMIT APPLICATION FEE$ CASE #: RECEIVED BY (staff initials): DATE RECEIVED: �0. N a * NOTE: 15 TOTAL SETS OF INFORMATION REQUIRED '(APPLICATIONS PLUS SITE PLAN SETS) FLEXMLE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION Comprehensive InfiIl Redevelopment Project (Revised 07/11/2008) — PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT— A. APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4- 202.A) Panorama on Clearwater Beach, LLC., APPLICANTNAME: a Florida limited liability company MAILING ADDRESS: 691 S. Gulfview Boulevard, Clearwater Beach, FL 33767 PHONE NUMBER: (727) 421 -1250 FAX NUMBER: CELL NUMBER EMAIL: P. PROPERTYOWNER(S): Samarlcns Reir. Triigt TTAn 3/27 .106, Mir•haPl A. Samarkog List ALL owners on the dead 106 Midway Island, Clearwater Beach, FL 33767 -2313 AGENT NAME: � 4C3Jz ,t'.' LQ u 6_f j ��1_'*/ _ MAILING ADDRESS: A. ' ��q U j�`7SRD PHONE NUMBER: FAX NUMBER: � <�4e 0 CELL NUMBER: EMAIL:�� B. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4- 202.A) PROJECT NAME: Ambiance- PROJECT VALUATION: $ Approx. $28 milli STREET ADDRESS 20 Kendall Street (and adjoining vacant parcels) PARCELNUMBER(S): See Exhibit "A" attached -- 8 parcels PARCEL SIZE (acres): 0,6 acre PARCEL SIZE (Square feet): 26,076 sq. ft. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: See Exhibit "A" attached'. PROPOSED USE(S): BA —unit overnight accommodations see Exhibit "B" attached. DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST: See Exhibit "B" attached. Specifically Identify the request (Include number of units or square footage of non - residential use and all requested code deviations; e.g. reduction in required number of parking spaces, specific use, etc.) CADocuments and Setting s\ derek.ferguson \Desktop\planning dept forms 0708 \Comprehensive Infill Project (FLD) 2008 07 -1 f .doc Pagel of 8 r DOES THIS APPLICATION INVOLVE THE TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS (fDR), A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, OR A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED (CERTIFIED) SITE PLAN? YES _ NO _ (if yes, attach a copy of the applicable documents) C. PROOF OF OWNERSHIP: (Code Section 4- 202.A.5) ❑ SUBMIT A COPY OF THE TITLE INSURANCE POLICY, DEED TO THE PROPERTY OR SIGN AFFIDAVIT ATTESTING OWNERSHIP (see page 7) D. ❑ 1. WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 3- 913.A) Provide complete responses to the six (6) GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA — Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail: The proposed development of the land will be In harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which' it Is located. See Exhibit "B" attached for responses to Criteria 1 through b. 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly Impair the value thereof. Ad �Y 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, Including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts, on adjacent properties. C: \Documents and Settings\ derek.ferguson \Desktop\planning dept forms 0708 \Comprehensive Infill Project (FLD) 2008 07- 11.doc Page 2 of 8 O c: • WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project Criteria) ❑ Provide complete responses to the six (6) COMPREHENSIVE INFILL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT CRITERIA — Explain how each criteria is achieved, In detail: 1. The development or redevelopment Is otherwise Impractical without deviations from the use and /or development standards set forth in this zoning district. See Exhibit "B" attached for responses to Criteria 1 through 6. 2. The development or redevelopment will be consistent with the goals and policles of the Comprehensive Plan, as well as with the general purpose, Intent and basic planning objectives of this Code, and with the intent and purpose of this zoning district 3. The development or redevelopment will not impede the normal and orderly development and Improvement of surrounding properties. 4. Adjoining propertles will not suffer substantial detriment as a result of the proposed development. 5 5. The proposed use shall otherwise be permitted by the underlying future land use category, be compatible with adjacent land uses, will rich„ substantially alter the essential use characteristics of the neighborhood; and shall demonstrate compliance with one or more of the follow £ objectives: a. The proposed use is permitted in this zoning district as a minimum standard, flexible standard or flexible development use; b. The proposed use would be a significant economic contributor to the City's economic base by diversifying the local economy or by creating ., jobs; c. The development proposal accommodates the expansion or redevelopment of an existing economic contributor; 7Z7 d. The proposed use provides for the provision of affordable housing; e. The proposed use provides for development or redevelopment in an area that is characterized by other similar development and where a land use plan amendment and rezoning would result in a spot land use or zoning designation; or f. The proposed use provides for the development of a new and /or preservation of a working waterfront use. 6. Flexlbility with regard to use, lot width, required setbacks, height and off - street parking are justified based on demonstrated compliance with all of the following design objectives: a. The proposed development will not Impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of the surrounding properties for uses permitted In this zoning district; b. The proposed development complies with applicable design guidelines adopted by the City; c. The design, scale and intensity of the proposed development supports the established or emerging character of an area; d. In order to form a cohesive, visually Interesting and attractive appearance, the proposed development incorporates a substantial number of the following design elements: ❑ Changes In horizontal building planes; ❑ Use of architectural details such as columns, cornices, stringcourses, pilasters, porticos, balconies, railings, awnings, etc.; '❑ Variety in materials, colors and textures; • Distinctive fenestration patterns; • Building stepbacks; and ❑ Distinctive roofs forms. ate buffers, enhanced landscape design and appropriate distances between buildings. e. The proposed development provides for appropri i n •Inn/1 !17_'1'1 tint C:\Documents and Settings \derek.ferguson\Desktop \planning d t s uruowompinllull v I till, Page of g ._ M0 t n .> � ©f�" 0 . 0 E. STORMWATER PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteria Manual and 4- 202.A.21) ❑ A STORMWATER NARRATIVE MUST BE SUBMITTED WITH ALL APPLICATIONS. All applications that involve addition or modification of impervious surface, indVding buildings, must include a stormwater plan that demonstrates compliance with the City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteria manual. A reduction in impervious surface area does not qualify as an exemption to this requirement. ❑ If a plan Is not required, the narrative shall provide an explanation as to why the site is exempt. • At a minimum, the STORMWATER PLAN shall Include the following; • Existing topography extending 50 feet beyond all property Imes; • Proposed grading Including finished floor elevations of all structures; ❑ All adjacent streets and municipal storm systems; ❑ Proposed stormwater detention/retention area including top of bank, toe of slope and outlet control structure; ❑ A narrative describing the proposed stormwater control plan Including all calculations and data necessary to demonstrate compliance with the City manual. n proposed stormwater detantlon /retention area including top of bank, toe of slope and outlet control structure; O Signature and seal of Florida Registered Professional Engineer on all plans and calculations. . ❑ COPY OF PERMIT INQUIRY LETTER OR SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT (SWFWMD) PERMIT SUBMITTAL (SWFWMD approval Is required prior to Issuance of City Building Permit), if applicable ❑ ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF STORMWATER PLAN REQUIREMENTS (Applicant must Initial one of the following): Stonnwater plan as noted above is Included 'ter Stormwater plan is not required and explanation narrative is attached. At a minimum, a grading plan and finished 0 elevations shall be provided.�� CAUTION — IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A STORMWATER P AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DET MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 562 -4750. F. SUPPLEMENTAL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 4- 202.A) ❑ SIGNED AND SEALED SURVEY (including legal description of property) —One original and 14 copies: ❑ TREE SURVEY (including existing trees on site and within 25' of the adjacent site, by species, size (DBH 4" or greater), and location, Including drip Imes and Indicating trees to be removed) —please design around the existing trees; ❑ TREE INVENTORY; prepared by a "certified arborist ", of all trees 4" DBH or greater, reflecting size, canopy (drip lines) and condition of such trees; ❑ LOCATION MAP OF THE PROPERTY; ❑ PARKING DEMAND STUDY In conjunction with a request to make deviations to the parking standards (le. Reduce number of spaces).. Prior to the submittal of this application, the methodology of such study shall be approved by the Community Development Coordinator and shall be In accordance with accepted traffic engineering principles. The findings of the study will be used in determining whether or not deviations to the parking standards are approved; ❑ GRADING PLAN, as applicable; ❑ PRELIMINARY PLAT, as required (Note: Building permits will not be issued until evidence of recording a final plat is provided); ❑ COPY OF RECORDED PLAT, as applicable; C: \Documents and Settings \derek.ferguson \Desktop \planning dept forms 0708\Comprehensive Infiil Project (FLD) 2008 07- 11.doc Page 4 of 8 Q G. SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4- 202.A) U SITE PLAN with the following Information (not to exceed 24" x 38'): Index sheet referencing individual sheets Included In package; North arrow; Engineering bar scale (minimum scale one Inch equals 50 feet), and date prepared; All dimensions; Footprint and size of all EXISTING buildings and structures; Footprint and size of all PROPOSED buildings and structures; All required setbacks; All existing and proposed points of access; All required sight triangles; dentificatlon of environmentally unique areas, such as watercourses, wetlands, tree masses, and specimen trees, including _ description and location of understory, ground cover vegetation and wildlife habitats, etc; Location of all public and private easements; Location of all street rights -of -way within and adjacent to the site; Location of existing public and private utilities, including fire hydrants, storm and sanitary sewer lines, manholes and lift stations, gas _ and water lines; All parking spaces, driveways, loading areas and vehicular use areas; Depiction by shading or crosshatching of all required parting lot Interior landscaped areas; Location of all solid waste containers, recycling or trash handling areas and outside mechanical equipment and all required screening (per Section 3- 201(D)(i) and Index #7011; Location of all landscape material; Location of all onsite and offslte storm -water management facilities; Location of all outdoor lighting fixtures; Location of all existing and proposed sidewalks; and Floor plan typicals of buildings for all Level Two approvals. A floor plan of each floor Is required for any parking garage requiring a _ Level Two approval. 0 SITE DATA TABLE for existing, required, and proposed development, In written/tabular form: EXISTING REQUIRED PROPOSED Land area In square feet and acres; Number of EXISTING dwelling units; Number of PROPOSED dwelling units; Gross floor area devoted to each use; Parking spaces: total number, presented in tabular form with the _ number of required spaces; Total paved area, Including all paved parking spaces & driveways, expressed In square feet & percentage of the paved vehicular area; Official records book and page numbers of all existing utillty _ easement; Building and structure heights; Impermeable surface ratio (I.S.R.); and Floor area ratio (FA.R.) for all nonresidential uses. ❑ REDUCED COLOR SITE PLAN to scale (8 % X 11); ❑ FOR DEVELOPMENTS OVER ONE ACRE, provide the following additional Information on site plan: One -foot contours or spot elevations on site; Offslte elevations if required to evaluate the proposed stormwater management for the parcel; All open space areas; Location of all earth or water retaining walls and earth berms; Lot lines and building lines (dimensioned); Streets and drives (dimensioned); Building and structural setbacks (dimensioned); Structural overhangs; C: \Documents and Settings \derek.ferguson\Desktop \planning dept forms 0708 \Comprehensive Infill Project (FLD) 2008 07- 11.doc Page 5 of 8 I`O C4� Uri 0 .0 H. LANDSCAPING PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4- 1102.A) ❑ LANDSCAPE PLAN with the following Information (not to exceed 24'x 36): All existing and proposed structures; Names of abutting streets; Drainage and retention areas Including swales, side slopes and bottom elevations; Delineation and dimensions of all required perimeter landscape buffers; Sight visibility triangles; Delineation and dimensions of all parking areas Including landscaping islands and curbing; Existing trees on -site and immediately adjacent to the site, by species, size and locations, including dripiines (as indicated on required tree survey); Location, size, and quantifies of all existing and proposed landscape materials, indicated by a key relating to the plant _ schedule; Plant schedule with a key (symbol or label) indicating the size, description, specifications, quantities, and spacing requirements of all _ existing and proposed landscape materials, Including botanical and common names; Typical planting details for trees, palms; shrubs and ground cover plants including instructions, soil mixes, backfilling, mulching and protective measures; Interior landscaping areas hatched and /or shaded and labeled and interior landscape coverage, expressing in both square feet and — percentage covered; Conditions of a previous development approval (e.g. conditions Imposed by the Community Development Board); Irrigation notes. ❑ REDUCED COLOR LANDSCAPE PLAN to scale (8 Y =X 11); Cl COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM application, as applicable. Landscape associated with the Comprehensive Landscape Program shall exceed minimum Code requirements to offset the areas where minimum Code will not be met. I. BUILDING ELEVATION PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4- 202.A.23) ❑ BUILDING ELEVATION DRAWINGS —with the following information: _31 w 0 J'D Irm All sides of all buildings' T Dimensioned Colors (provide one full sized set of colored elevations) t — Materials rat . 'm ❑ REDUCED BUILDING ELEVATIONS —same as above to scale on 8' / =X 11 J. SIGNAGE: (Division 19. SIGNS/ Section 3 -1806) ❑ All EXISTING freestanding and attached signs; Provide photographs and dimensions (area, height, etc.), Indicate whether they will be removed or to remain. ❑ All PROPOSED freestanding and attached signs; Provide details including location, size, height, colors, materials and drawing; freestanding signs shall include the street address (numerals) ❑ Comprehensive Sign Program application, as applicable (separate application and fee required). ❑ Reduced signage proposal (8 Y X 11) (color), If submitting Comprehensive Sign Program application. CADocuments and Settings \derek.ferguson \Desktop \planning dept forms 0708 \Comprehensive Infill Project (FLO) 2008 07- 11.doc Page 6 of 8 K. TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY: (Section 4- 202.A.13 and 4- 801.C) ❑ Include if required by the Traffic Operations Manager or his/her designee or If the proposed development: • Will degrade the acceptable level of service for any roadway as adopted in the Comprehensive Plan. ■ Will generate 100 or more new vehicle directional trips per hour and /or 1000 or more new vehicle trips per day. • Will affect a nearby roadway segment and /or Intersection with five (5) reportable accidents within the prior twelve (12) month period or that is on the City's annual list of most hazardous intersections. Trip generation shall be based on the most recent edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineer's (ITE) Trip General Manual. The Traffic Impact Study. must be prepared in accordance with a "Scoping Meeting" held with the Traffic Operations Manager and the Planning Department's Development Review Manager or their designee (727 - 562 -4750) Refer to Section 4 -801 C of the Community Development Code for exceptions to this requirement. a_,!..._.h__,. 13 Acknowledgement of traffic impact study requirements ( Appiicaant n lust initial or of tho iuiwwn yr. �//�� Traffic Impact Study Is Included. The study must include a summary table of pre- and post - development levels of service for all roadway legs and each turning movement at all intersections identified In the Scoping Meeting. Traffic Impact Study Is not required. CAUTION — IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 562- 4750. L. FIRE FLOW CALCULATIONS/ WATER STUDY: Provide Fire Flow Calculations. Water Study by a FIRE PROTECTION ENGINEER to assure an adequate water supply Is available and to Wermine if any upgrades are required by the developer due to the impact of this project. The water supply must be able to support the needs of i('uired fire sprinkler, standpipe and /or firs pump. If a fire pump is required the water supply must be able to supply 150% of its rated capacity. nce with the 2004 Florida Fire Prevention Code to include NFPA 13, MFPA 14, NFPA 20, NFPA 291, and MFPA 1142 (Annex H) is required. z - - _ - A ❑ Acknowledgement of fire flow calculafions/water study requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following): F �f r Fire Flow Calculatlons/Water Study is Included. Fire Flow Calculations/Water Study is not required. lei, C 9 CAUTION -- IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A FIRE U-2 CALCULATIONS/ WATER STUDY AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MU E RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. if you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Fire Prevention Department at (727) 562 -4334. M. SIGNATURE: I, the undersigned, acknowledge that all representations made In this application are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge and authorize City representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application. JOHNSON, POPE, BOKOR, RUPPEL & BURN LLP BT. Signature of property owner or repre sentative D Katherine E. Cole. Escuire STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINE,( ,LAS Swom to and subscribed before me this 14_rl`day of Nntrenh e r A.D. 20__D_B_ to me and/or by Katherine E. Cole who is personally known" Im XXXXXXXXXXX x�c'jfl��x �t edary bfic, .•■�� "dL Ja ne E. Sears My commission expires: = 1Ct\; •, T commission # D0449633 Expires 5eptemoer z, .4vvzo Bc,4e TM, Fee- MOM%& Inc e004e5l019 C :\Documents and Settings \derek.ferguson\Desktop \planning dept forms 0708\Comprehensive Infill Project (FLD) 2008 07- 11.doc Page 7 of 8 72— r. �rRI?fIERrhtL?t�rRDFIERF PAGE X11 y4 4I��94244(�7 P.1 I r fCUI'1: CITY OF CLEARWATER AFFIDAVIT TO AUTHORUE AGENT PL,ANNENG 91 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES A®R[IA7ySTRATTON MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, loo S01-MI MYRTLE AVENU12. 2^4 rLaoR PHONE (727 - 662 -4567 PAX (727) 562 -4576 Fvangeline P Samnrkoe, Revocable Writer c/o Samarkaa, Fvangelina P '1`r (iJaarne at all prop ®,ay r,wnura) �' _ - 1. That (I Sm/we are) the owner(s) and record title holder(s) of the following described property: 20 1(anda2l. Street, Clearwater Boach, FL {Addroos brGanaml Lacr�lla�l — — z. That this property cortatitutes the property for which a request for a., 0 � 74 transient unit accomadntl,ons wid 14 iractional unit P i s presently peedi ng Irlal�a� of fa�cluaeE)> _ _ ras � c r 3. That the undersignad (has /have) appointed and (does /do) appoint VA Hoopar. ea {tltaAhnlr) �atlmnq�} to wx4ttole any p0fians air othar ctomcmamte . ^,sawa ry ho aftnt auah pwitlan; 4. That this affidavit has he an executed to induce the City of Cleanristar, Florida to consider and act on the abova described pmporty; 5. That (ilwaj, this terlci8r:ti rt et authority, hereby Certl / th at the using is true nd correct, rzipgrfy t;?wnst i PM,}',arty L�n�r STA.T15 of FLORIDA, COO NTV OF <g1f4Et.l,As 13edor me Ilia unde lgiied, an officer duty camIaaloned y His laws of tho omongAy appeared -, 4 L.121 doposes nd says that ho� a, dilly understands tim enta a9 tho' afAdavft My Commission Expires: JC(o a,C % U; aPPalasUOn inrrttsre 8V01apmant rbvinw /AttgdWt to Aollin as t1(Ont or Piorida, on this /• L day of Qn.., who having bsen,flrat duly sworn ra ` oio� °�o� SHARON SKINNER � tJotary Public -State of Florida My Corhm. Expires Ott 16, 2012 �� 1 F I Commission # DD 031684 0 f CITY OF LE A RWAT AFFIDAVIT TO AUTHORIZE AGENT S�,Atva�� PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES ADMINISTRATION ��` ✓,grEq MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILI)TNG, 100 SOU "l "Ji NAYll'rLE AVENUE, 2 "<' FLOOR PHONE (727) - 562 -4567 17AX (727) 562 -4576 Uday Lele, Managing Member, Panorama on Clearwater Beach (Name of all property owners) 1. That (I am /we are) the owner(s) and record title holder(s) of the following described property: Lots 5, 6, 7, 8 & 14, Block 7, Clearwater Beach, Florida (Address or General Location) 2. That this property constitutes the property for which a request fora: 74 transient unit accommodations and 14 fractional units ,Z r --s (Nature of request) 3. That the undersigned (/has /have) appointed / and (doesi'do) appoint Ed Hooper as (his /their) agent(s) to execute any petitions or other documents necessary to affect such petition, 4. That this affidavit has been executed to induce the City of Clearwater, Florida to consider and act on the above described property; That (Uwe), the undersigned authority, hereby certify that the foreq.oing is true and eoerect. y Property Owner Property Owner STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS on this day of Before me the undersigned, an officer duly commissioned by the I . s �F\the State of Floridawho having been first duly sworn \�` personally appeared ��F \1 depose\s and says that he /she fully understands the contents oY the affidavit that he /she signed. Notary ublic My Commission Expires: t5' s: application forms /development review /Affidavit to Authorize Agent � db g� +` i) t�rJ!' +rstt `,ta zlfst t �y1 s 3' h11ti i i CYj ;! rr ?.S 0 t (tai= kf ,K,. ` I #: 21004480869 BK: 13994 PG: 1450• /10/2004 at 10:54 AM, RECORDING 1 PAGE• $10.00 D DOC STAMP COLLECTION $15015.00 KARLEEN F. DE BLAKER, CLERK OF COURT PINELLAS COUNTY, FL BY DEPUTY CLERK: CLKDUI5 ;s File No. R -33710 ? Parcel I.D. No.: 05/29/15/16367/4'110i40 This Instrument Prepared By aqd - *4_mto: R. Carlton Ward, Esclufie; " Richards, Gilkey, File, Slaughter,p'relesi & Ward, P.A. 1253 Park Street Clearwater, Florida 337561, 1 , Grantee S.S. No.: t Name: Panorama o�ilaarwater Beach, I.I.C. Grantee S. S. No.:; 1� Name: /. Space Above This Line for Recording Data] WARRANTY DEED i i Indenture made this day of fj)42/Z�, 2004 BETWEEN Allan J. Crocker, matheO, whose mailing address is 16 Kendall Street, Clearwater, Florida 33767, GRANTOR% and Panorama on GI@ar yater Beach, LLC., a Florida limited liability company, as GRANTEE', whose mailing address Is x.211 South Myrtle Ave, Clearwater, Florida 33756. i 'W I T N E S S E T H, That said Grantor, for and in consideration of the sum of TEN AND 00 /100'S ($10.00) �v ©ollars and other good and valuable considerations to said Grantor In hand paid by said Grantee, the receipt whereof is _„!hereby acknowledged, has granted, bargained and sold to the Grantee and Grantee's heirs and assigns forever the following described land situate, lying and being Pinellas County, Florida, to -wit: The South 23.5 feet of Lot 5, and all of Lot 14, Block 7, REVISED MAP OF CLEARWATER BEACH, according to the map or plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 11, page 5, Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida.. Subject to easements, restrictions and reservations of record and taxes for the year 2005 and thereafter. This property is not now, nor has it ever been, during the period of Grantor(s) ownership, homestead property as defined by the constitution of the State of Florida. and said Grantor does hereby fully warrant the title to said land, and will defend the same against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever. — Grantor" and "Grantee" are used for singular or plural, as context requires. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Grantor has hereunto set Grantor's hand and seal this day and year first above written. Signed, sealed and delivered In our presence as witnesses: Print1N s e' r -70e, Allan J. CrooKer Print Wftness Name: STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF PINELLAS I HEREBY CERTIFY that on this day before me, an officer duly author �ica e�rnow10 gem n Allan J. Crocker, married, who is personally known to me or who has produced �Ty"'fTi1��'Gl. /2`?71 .YGr�r ff6iiiihtHicetlon, and he/she Is the person described In and who executed the Warranty Deed and he/she acknowledged then and there before me that he/she executed the same for the purposes therein expressed - WITNESS my hand and official seal in the County and State lest said t of 15_4004. No blic R.CatltonVANd Sion expriabUN- 18,6006 a O� Fk1" 0� ORIGINAL RECEIVED �� 10 2009 PIANK f CLtARA'Aft I #: 2004480867 BK: 13994 PG: 1448• /10/2004 at 10:54 AM, RECORDING 1 PAGES $10.00 D DOC STAMP COLLECTION $9800.00 KARLEEN F. DE BLAKER, CLERK OF COURT PINELLAS COUNTY, FL BY DEPUTY CLERK: CLKDUI5 :r File No. R -33709 Parcel I.D. No.: 05/29/15/1636910#7 /0050 This Instrument Prepared By al�clkPgtuuln to: R. Carlton Ward, Esquire,,, .' Richards, Gilkey, Fite, Slaughter, Pretesl 8 Ward, P.A. 1253 Park Street Clearwater, Florida 3375, .. [Space Above This Line for Recording Data] WARRANTY DEED Thi;g.,�tl�lendure made this day of _, 2004 BETWEEN LaMar Beach Club, LLC., a Colorill o.60nited Liability company, having its principal place of business at 200 Brightwater,Dr., 67, Cleerwgt..i orida 33767, party of the first part, and Panorama on Clearwater Beach, LLC., a Florida limitaid'1lab,illty company, whose mailing address is 211 South Myrtle Ave, Clearwater, Florida 33756, party of the T N E S S E T H, That said party of the first part for and in consideration of the sum of TEN AND 1bdh0drS (510.00) Dollars and other good and valuable considerations to said party of the first part in hand paid by said ^- •part'y•yf the second part, the receipt whereof Is hereby acknowledged, has granted, bargained and sold to the said party bf:the second part forever, the following described land situate, lying and being Pinellas County, Florida, to -wit: The North 63 1/2 feet of Lot 5, Block 7, REVISED MAP OF CLEARWATER BEACH, according to the map or plat thereof as recorded In Plat Book 11, page 5 of the Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida. Subject to easements, restrictions and reservations of record and taxes for the year 2005 and thereafter. and said party of the first part does hereby fully warrant the this to said land, and will defend the same against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said party of the first part has caused these presents to be signed In its name by its authorized corporate officer, and its corporate seal to be affixed thereto, the day and year above written. Signed, sealed and delivered in our presence as witnesses: LaMar B Clu ,LLC. rint Wftn oil 4 C=e-'r- Print Witness Name: Ajn raig Nasal esiden STATE OF C ORADO COUNTY OF I HEREBY CERTIFY that on this day the next above named State and County before me, an officer duly authorized and acting personally appeared Craig Nasal, President of LaMer Beach Club, LLC., a Colorado Limited Liability company to me known and he is the person described In and who executed the foregoing hstrument, and he acknowledged that he executed the same as such officer for the purposes therein expressed; that he affixed thereto the official seal of said corporation; and that the said Instrument Is the act and deed of said corporation. WITNESS my hand and official seal In the County and State foresaid this y of 2004. i Name: L NICOLE S. COPPLE Notary Public NOTARY PUBLIC Commission No. STATE OF COLORADO My Commission expires: 3U My Commission Expires 08/30/2008 Q 1< ORIGINAL RECEIVED 17M 10 2009 WARWAMP i I #: 2004480868 BK: 13994 PG: 1449, 12/10/2004 at 10:54 AM, RECORDING 1 PAGES $10.00 D DOC STAMP COLLECTION $4900.00 KARLEEN F. DE BLAKER, CLERK OF COURT PINELLAS COUNTY, FL BY DEPUTY CLERK: CLRDUI5 W `I,T,.,N E S S E T H, That said party of the first part for and In consideration of the sum of TEN AND 00/1QOfS ($10.00) Dollars and other good end valuable considerations to as party of the first part In hand paid by said pally ot.t as pert, the receipt where of is hereby acknowledged, has granted, bargained and sold to the said party ob.the and part forever, the fofiowing described and situate, yang and being Pinellas County, Florida, to-wk. Lot 6, Block 7, CLEARWATER BEACH REVISED, according to the map or plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 11, page 5 of the Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida. Subject to easements, restrictions and reservations of record and taxes for the year 2005 and thereafter. and said party of the first part does hereby fully warrant the title to said land, "and will defend the same against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever. - IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said party of the first part has caused these presents to be signed In its name by its authorized corporate officer, and its corporate seal to be affixed thereto, the day and year above written. Signed, sealed and delivered In our presence as witnesses: McSmith, Inc. P Wkn s ame: a Flor cor. ration By; Pant Witness Name: D. Le ikon, President FR-- 146ew STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF PINELLAS I HEREBY CERTIFY that on this day the next above named State and County before me, an officer duly authorized and acting personally appeared D. Lance Wilson, President of McSmith, Inc., a Florida corporation to me known and he Is the person described In and who executed the foregoing Instrument, and he acknowledged that he executed the same as such officer to, the purposes therein expressed; that he affixed thereto the official seat of said corporation; and that the said Instrument is the act and deed of said corporation. WITNESS my hand and official sea] In the County and State last aforesaid this day of 2004. Name: Notary P "I. Commiss No. nµ,2i:vly Comm slon expires: Y: pis as G. Hercem '.: MYCOMAtisSfOa, 00152202 4amESah" o�Z20�0IRES Ke RIGIM aCEI Y ED 10 2009 PLA ' i& WOW NT NT Flie No. R- 33698 <' Parcel I.D. No.: 05129/15/1636#/`OQA060 This Instrument Prepared By a dAeiuu0 to: R. Carlton Ward, Esquire," Richards, Gilkey, Fite, Slaughter, Pretest 8 Ward, P.A. 1253 Park Street y Clearwater, Florida 33756 • 64 [Space Above This Line for Recording Data] -' WARRANTY DEED This,. hi' ', ture made this :�4 day of zk�11. 2004 BETWEEN McSmith, Inc., a Florida corporatio'#, tIa'ying Its principal place of business at 2440 Roberta Lane, Clearwater, Florida 33764, party of the first pan, and PaOrama on Clearwater Beach, LLC., a Florida limited liability company, whose mailing address 15 f3t.1 South Myrtle Ave, Clearwater, Florida 33756, party of the second part. W `I,T,.,N E S S E T H, That said party of the first part for and In consideration of the sum of TEN AND 00/1QOfS ($10.00) Dollars and other good end valuable considerations to as party of the first part In hand paid by said pally ot.t as pert, the receipt where of is hereby acknowledged, has granted, bargained and sold to the said party ob.the and part forever, the fofiowing described and situate, yang and being Pinellas County, Florida, to-wk. Lot 6, Block 7, CLEARWATER BEACH REVISED, according to the map or plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 11, page 5 of the Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida. Subject to easements, restrictions and reservations of record and taxes for the year 2005 and thereafter. and said party of the first part does hereby fully warrant the title to said land, "and will defend the same against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever. - IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said party of the first part has caused these presents to be signed In its name by its authorized corporate officer, and its corporate seal to be affixed thereto, the day and year above written. Signed, sealed and delivered In our presence as witnesses: McSmith, Inc. P Wkn s ame: a Flor cor. ration By; Pant Witness Name: D. Le ikon, President FR-- 146ew STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF PINELLAS I HEREBY CERTIFY that on this day the next above named State and County before me, an officer duly authorized and acting personally appeared D. Lance Wilson, President of McSmith, Inc., a Florida corporation to me known and he Is the person described In and who executed the foregoing Instrument, and he acknowledged that he executed the same as such officer to, the purposes therein expressed; that he affixed thereto the official seat of said corporation; and that the said Instrument is the act and deed of said corporation. WITNESS my hand and official sea] In the County and State last aforesaid this day of 2004. Name: Notary P "I. Commiss No. nµ,2i:vly Comm slon expires: Y: pis as G. Hercem '.: MYCOMAtisSfOa, 00152202 4amESah" o�Z20�0IRES Ke RIGIM aCEI Y ED 10 2009 PLA ' i& WOW NT NT I #: 2005028500 BK: 14080 PG: 1014, 01/25/2005 $27.00 D DOC STAMP COLLECTION $11200.00 KEN COUNTY, FL BY DEPUTY CLERK: CLKDUI7 . 4 This document prepared by And after recording return to: John B. Gibbons, Esq. ' Saxon, Gilmore, Carraway, Gibbdns� Lash & Wilcox, P.A. 201 East Kennedy Boulevard Suite 600 " • at 11:39 AM, RECORDING 3 PAGES BURKE, CLERK OF COURT PINELLAS Tampa, FL 33602 PARCEL I.D. NOS. .,- 05=29 -15- 16362- 007 -0070 '05.29 -15- 16362- 007 -0071 - 5- 29 -15- 16362- 007 -0080 ;,- -_% ti -5- 29 -15- 16362 -007 -0081 ` ` WARRANTY DEED Ts` Indenture, is made this day of January, 2005, between Pasquale Calderoni, as Trustee Q the,,Tasquale Calderoni Revocable Trust, by trust instrument dated June 25, 2001, and Aida ..U&xotiL as Trustee of the Aida Calderoni Revocable Trust, by trust instrument dated June 25, 80P-vhose address is 4516 W. North B Street, Tampa, Florida 33609 (together, " Chwitvr'% and Panorama on Clearwater Beach, LLC, a Florida limited liability company, ,uirhq .— address is 483 Mandalay Avenue, Suite 209, Clearwater, Florida 33765, of the County of Pinellas, State of Florida ( "Grantee "). WITNESSETH, that Grantor, for and in consideration of the sum of Ten Dollars and other good and valuable consideration to Grantor in hand paid by Grantee, the receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, has granted, bargained and sold to Grantee and Grantee's successors and assigns forever, the following described land, situate, lying and being in the County of Pinellas, State of Florida, to wit: SEE EXHIBIT "A" ATTACHED HERETO Grantor does hereby fully warrant the title to said land, and will defend the same against lawful claims of all persons whomsoever. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Grantor has hereunto set its hand and seal the day and year first above written. Witnesses: iVA , 24 PAASQUALE CALDERONI, AS TRUSTEE OF THE PASQUALE CALDERONI REVOCABLE TRUST, BY TRUST INSTRUMENT DATED JUNE 25, 2001 ORIGIN RICER® !:17R 10 2009 CffY OF CLEARWA` 1 PINELLAS COUNTY FL OFF. REC. BK 14080 PG 1015 Print Name: ./8101 AIDA CALDERONI, AS TRUSTEE OF THE AIDA CALDERONI REVOCABLE TRUST, BY TRUST INSTRUMENT. DATED JUNE 25, 2001 Print Name: 6 .l'I 4, 1 STATE Q� PLORIDA COUNTY., HILLSBOROUGH Thu foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 5 day of January, 2005, by �asquale Calderon, as Trustee of the Pasquale Calderoni Revocable Trust, by trust instrument dafeii >Iune 25, 2001. He is personally known to me or has produced as i entification. ti's•, ��° V � � _ Zubm E Rm Notary Public, State of Florida W carW"M GOMM2 E, W11 FArmy Co. = STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF HILLSBOROUGH Print Name: My Commission Expires: The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of January, 2005, by Aida Calderon, as Trustee of the Aida Calderon Revocable Trust, by trust instrument dated June 25, 2001. She is personally known to me or has produced as identification. D 4 ZWM E• Pm Notary Public, State of Florida EON F'°""`y °°. soa Print Name: op'lGIML My Commission Expires: �'ECIE VED e:\ caideroni \closdocs\deedfinal.doc 4 } 0 LU0 CW1( OF CLtAR AAFE PINELLAS COUNTY FL-OFF. REC. BK 14080 PG 1016 EXHIBIT "A" Lots 7 and 8, Block 7 REYIStb"MAP OF CLEARW ATER BEACH, according to the map or plat thereof recorded i(plat Book 11, page 5, of the pub id,, of Pinellas County, Florida. 01RIGIM FF1 .10 2009 g, C, Wy OF C&RIRA"F: I #:2005494589 BK: 14801 PG: 517, 12/13/2005 at 09:00 AM, RECORDING 2 PAGES $18.50 D DOC STAMP COLLECTION $0.70 KEN BURKE, CLERK OF COURT PINELLAS COUNTY, FL BY DEPUTY CLERK: CLKDMC6 Personal Representative's Deed``.,� 0 RETURN TO & Gary W. Lyoria,,,sq. PREPARED BY: McFarlan;., o" d, Lyons, Sullivan &`$ogan, P.A. 311 S, "ssouri Avenue Clearwatei,,Florida 33756 Tax Parcel No. 05/29I'k5116362/007/0130 �.z Grantor's Name: s Isa of Anthony M. Samarkos, deceased Grantee's Name: j~, l.vangeline Samarkos Grantee's Name:"',*' Michael A. Samarkos Grantee's Name;' ,,. Victory Harkey PropertyAdd�ss: 20 Kendall Street Clearwater, FL PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE'S DEED This Indenture, made this la day of CL A.D., 2005, Between, 'EVANGELINE P. SAMARKOS, Personal Representative of the Estate of ANTHONY M. SAMARKOS, deceased, as Decedent's interests may appear (hereinafter referred to as "Grantor "), - AND- EVANGELINE SAMARKOS, an unremarried widow, as to a 50% interest, whose post q f jice address is: 106 Midway Island, Clearwater, FL 33767, MICHAEL A. SAMARKOS, a married man as to a 25% interest, whose post o ffice address is: 944 Oakview Road Tarpon Springs, FL 34689 and VICTORIA HARKEY, a married woman as to a 25% interest, whose post office address is: 1509 Willow Brook Drive, Palm, Harbor, Fl 34683 (hereinafter referred to as "Grantee"). WITNESSETH, That Grantor, acting under the power and authority granted the Personal Representative under the last Will and Testament ofANTHONYM. SAMARKOS„ deceased, and such Letters ofAdministration datedApril 29,2005 admitted to probate in Pinellas County, Florida, Probate Division, Case No. 05- 3267 -ES3„ for the sum of $10.00 in hand paid, does hereby grant, bargain, sell and convey unto the Grantee and Grantee's heirs and assigns forever, the land situate in the County of Pinellas, State of Florida, to -wit: Lot 13, Block 7, CLEARWATER BEACH REVISED, according to the map or plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 11, page 5, of the Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida. mia Subject to Real properly taxes for the year 2005 and subsequent years. Subject to all easement, reservation, restrictions, and covenants of record. UJ TOGETHER WITH all and singular the tenements, hereditaments, and appurtenances thereunto belonging or in anywise appertaining, and all the right, title, interest, claim and demand whatsoever, which the decedent had at the time of his death, in and to the premises. The undersigned Personal Representative also releases any lien rights that it may have pursuant to Chapter 733, Florida Statutes and warrants against the possibility of a Personal Representative's Lien. p- U_ 0 PINELLAS COUNTY FL OFF. REC. BK 14801 PG 518 0 TO HAVE AND T HOLD the same unto the Grantee and Grantee's successors and assigns forever. IN WITNESS,,WWEREOF, Grantor has hereunto set Grantor's hand and seal the day and year first above written. '•L� i .y Witne s #4' �ff "� Signature cW Print Naive: EVANGELINE P. SAMARKOS Personal Representative of the Estate of ANTHONY M. SAMARKOS, deceased STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF PINELLAS The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this Jp day of 2005, by EVANGELINE P. ,SAMARKOS, as Personal Representative of the Estate ofANTHONYM. SAMARKOS, deceased, who is/arepxxsonally know or who has produced a driver's license as identification and who did take an ath. 7 KAREN M. ROGIERS h MY COMMISSION 1 DD 177649 IXPIRES: January 15, 2007 ��:� Bwded7TrulblsryRLklhderwleri Notary Public Notary Please Print Name: My Commission Expires: Commission Number: (SEAL) P:\ does \CLIENTS4 4-40999\40875.01 Samarkos, Estate of Andmy - Probate\PRDeed 700 N Pinellas.wpd ga�EWEID 10 zoos PLO". CIO OF CL I #: 2006119018 BK: 15024 PG: 1778, 03/31/2006 at 11:19 AM, RECORDING 2 PAGES $18.50 D DOC STAMP COLLECTION $0.70 KEN BURKE, CLERK OF COURT PINELLAS COUNTY, FL BY DEPUTY CLERK: CLKDM04 ;i r : RETURN TO & Prepared By: Gary W. Lyons, )sq., McFarland, Gould ;• Lyons, Sullivan ,& fZog i -,P.A. 311 S. Missouri Avenue Clearwater,I..3756 j� 727 -461 -1111 Grantor's Name: _, ; f)r ngeline Samarkos Grantee's Name-,,, `,_tvangeline P. Samarkos, Trustee Tax Parcel No.: `'•'. 05/29/15/16362/007 /0130 Property AdBress;' 20 Kendall Street, Clearwater, Florida !C QUITCLAIM DEED This Indenture, made this 27't' day of March, A.D. 2006, Between Evangeline Samarkos, an unremarried t�vi`llow, whose post office address is: 106 Midway Island, Clearwater, FL 33757 (hereinafter referred to as "Grantor'), 6,Evangeline A Samarkos, as Trustee of the Evangeline A Samarkos Revocable Trust under trust dated March 27, • .,2b06whose post office address is: 106 Midway Island, Clearwater, FL 33757 (hereinafter referred to as "Grantee'). WITNESSETH, That said Grantor, in consideration of the sum of TENAND 001100'S ($10.00) Dollars and other good and valuable considerations in hand paid by the said Grantee, the receipt whereof is' hereby acknowledged, has remised, released and quit claimed, and by these presents does remise, release and quitclaim unto the said Grantee all the right, title, interest claim and demand which the said Grantor has in and to the following described lot, piece or parcel of land, situate, lying and being in the County of Pinellas, State of Florida, to -wit: Lot 13, Block 7, CLEARWATER BEACHREVISED, according to the map or plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 11, page 5, of the Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida, said interest being a 50% interest in this described property. The Grantee, as trustee, has the full power and authority to protect, conserve, sell, convey, lease, encumber, and to otherwise manage and dispose of said real property pursuant to F.S. 689.071. Subject property is not the homestead property of the Grantee. Subject to all Easements, Covenants, Restrictions and Reservations of record and to Real property taxes for the year 2006 and subsequent years. To Have and to Hold the same, together with all and singular the appurtenances thereunto belonging or in anywise appertaining, and all the estate, right, title, interest and claim whatsoever of the said Grantor, either in law or equity, to the only proper use, benefit and behoof of the said Grantee. "Grantor" and "Grantee" are used for singular or plural, as context requires. SAW. � PINELLAS COUNTY FL OFF. REC. BK 15024 PG 1779 FR x IN9777VESS NWEREOF, Grqhtor has hereunto set Grantor's hand and seal the day and year first above written. Signed, sealed and delivered in Me•iesence of.- N, t i---,Gt7TY OF PINELLAS The foregoing ins truf as acknowledged before me this known n! 0! w!! n to 0 :3� Samarkos who js �rsonally own o or who has produced a as identificaftn—a-n-d-wTo-Vid not take an oath. #0 0& Notary Public State of Florida Barbara i WolDdzko My Commission DD460438 V100 Ik Expires 08110009 214 day of March 2006, by Evangeline driver's license 4Notary Public Notary Please PI),-C: My Commission Expires: Commission Number: (SEAL) P:\docs\M1S0Cathy White\Jan Vella\GWL\QCD Samarkos to Samarkos TR 20 Kendall.wpd I #: 2004480869 BK: 13994 PG: 1450, 14 4/10/2004 at 10:54 AM, RECORDING 1 PAGES $10.00 D DOC STAMP COLLECTION $15015.00 KARLEEN F. DE BLAKER, CLERK OF COURT PI14ELLAS COUNTY, FL BY DEPUTY CLERK: CLKDUI5 File No. R -33710 Parcel I.D. No.: 05/29/15/1636VO.Q770.140 This Instrument Prepared By and1?6tuim fo: Carlton Ward, Esquire;. Richards, d 20 K E N DA L L ST Richards, Glkey, Fite, Slaughter'. Ids! &Ward, P.A. 1263 Park Street F L D 2 00 8 -12 0 34 Clearwater, Florida 33756'- "` Grantee S.S. No.: Name: Panorama 6r)'Qearwaler Beach, I.I.C. AMBIANCE Grantee S.S. No.;_ Zoning: T atlas# 258A Name: [Space Above This Line for Recording Data] — WAR R A N T Y D E E D Tt>i6 Indenture made this day of 2004 BETWEEN Allan J. Crocker, merited, whose mailing address is 16 Kendall Street, Clearwater, Florida 33767, GRANTOR% and Panorama on ,,Clearwater Beach, LLC., a Florida limited liability company, as GRANTEE', whose mailing address is - `.211'S.outh Myrtle Ave, Clearwater, Florida 33756. W .I T N E S S E T H, That said Grantor, for and in consideration of the sum of TEN AND 001100'S ($10.00) ,Dollars and other good and valuable considerations to said Grantor in hand paid by said Grantee, the receipt whereof is _, .ihereby acknowledged, has granted, bargained and sold to the Grantee and Grantee's heirs and assigns forever the following described land situate, lying and being Pinellas County, Florida, to -wit: The South 23.5 feet of Lot 5, and all of Lot 14, Block 7, REVISED MAP OF CLEARWATER BEACH, according to the map or plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 11, page 5, Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida. Subject to easements, restrictions and reservations of record and taxes for the year 2005 and thereafter. This property is not now, nor has it ever been, during the period of Grantor(s) ownership, homestead property as defined by the constitution of the State of Florida. and said Grantor does hereby fully warrant the title to said land, and will defend the same against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever. "Grantor" and "Grantee" are used for singular or plural, as context requires. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Grantor has hereunto set Grantor's hand and seal this day and year first above written. Signed, sealed and delivered in our presence as witnesses: Print W s• ,e:' z Alwo T Allan J. Crool er i Prin t fitness Name: STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF PINELIAS I HEREBY CERTIFY that on this day before me, an officer duly authoru: d t 'e air rows gem ntt Alta J. Crocker, married, who is personally known to me or who has produced _ �§ i�efttHication, and he/she is the person described in and who executed the Warranty Dead and he/she acknowledged then and there before me that he /she executed the same for the purposes therein expressed. �� WITNESS my hand and official seal in the County and State lZ�t said _ of kk 4_�1 04. Name: obliNc, R CaAtonWad stop expr�htu0ry180.0 0� P, V { VVE EC 01 2008 CITY OF CLEA"liv, I #: 2004480867 BK: 13994 PG: 1448, 110%2004 at 10:54 AM, RECORDING 1 PAGES $10.00 D DOC STAMP COLLECTION $9800.00 KARLEEN F. DE BLAKER, CLERK OF COURT PINELLAS COUNTY, FL BY DEPUTY CLERK: CLKDUI5 File No. R -33709 Parcel I.D. No.: 05/29/15/1636MO 0050 This Instrument Prepared By and tatutn to: R. Carlton Ward, Esquire,__,` Richards, Gilkey, Fite, Slaughter, Pratesl & Ward, P.A. 1253 Park Street Clearwater, Florida 3375F�`;_ [Space Above This Line for Recording Data] '.,. WARRANTY DEED Thig.,Rudeiiture made this S� day of _. 2004 BETWEEN LaMer Beach Club, LLC., a Colorado: Limited Liability company, having its principal place of business at 200 Brightwaler Dr., i7, Clearwater,'F,lorida 33767, party of the first part, and Panorama on Clearwater Beach, LLC., a Florida limiti fi. 1010ltity company, whose mailing address is 211 South Myrtle Ave, Clearwater, Florida 33756, party of the LT N E S S E T H, That said party of the first part for and in consideration of the sum of TEN AND !b(,(11,Ob`S'($10.00) Dollars and other good and valuable considerations to said party of the first part in hand paid by said Party of the second part, the receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, has granted, bargained and sold to the said party bf1he second part forever, the following described land situate, tying and being Pinellas County, Florida, to-wit: The North 63 1/2 feet of Lot 5, Block 7, REVISED MAP OF CLEARWATER BEACH, according to the map or plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 11, page 5 of the Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida. Subject to easements, restrictions and reservations of record and taxes for the year 2005 and thereafter. and said party of the first part does hereby fully warrant the title to said land, and will defend the same against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever. M WITNESS WHEREOF, the said party of the first part has caused these presents to be signed in its name by its authorized corporate officer, and its corporate seal to be affoted thereto, the day and year above written. Signed, sealed and delivered in our presence as witnesses: f' LaMer Clu , LLC. riot Wltn Print witness Name: q j raig Nasal esiden STATE OF C ORADO COUNTY OF I HEREBY CERTIFY that on this day the next above named State and County before me, an officer duly authorized and acting personally appeared Craig Nassi, President of LaMer Beach Club, LLC., a Colorado Lirnilyd Liability company to me known and he is the person described in and who executed the foregoing Instrument and he acknowledged that he sxecuted the same as such officer for the purposes therein expressed: that he affixed thereto the official seal of said corporation; and that the sald instrumem is the act and deed of said corpora%ion. WITNESS my hand and official seal in the County and State foresatd this6� y of , 2004. Name: C — NICOLE S. COPPLE Notary Public NOTARY PUBLIC Commission No. STATE OF COLORADO My Commission expires: 3U My Commission Expires 08130/2008 �o I #: 2004480868 BK: 13994 PG: 1449, 12/10/2004 at 10:54 AM, RECORDING 1 PAGE $10.00 D DOC STAMP COLLECTION $4900.00 KARLEEN F. DE BLAKER, CLERK OF COURT PINELLAS COUNTY, FL BY DEPUTY CLERK: CLKDUI5 File No. R -33698 Parcel I.D. No.: 05/29/15/16364/164.7/b060 This Instrument Prepared By andAe)ufn to: R. Carlton Ward, Esquire..._ Richards, Gilkey, Fite, Slaughter, Pratesi 6 Ward, P.A. 1253 Park Street Clearwater, Florida 33756,,._ i ]Space Above This Line for Recording Data] WARRANTY - DEED Thie ii tleriture made this day of A X� Lane, BETWEEN MCSmith, Inc., a Florida corporati;;n, h'"g Its principal place of business at 2440 Roberta Lane, Clearwater, Florida 33764, party of the first part, and;PaRorama on Clearwater Beach, LLC., a Florida limited liability company, whose mailing addre ss ,is•'21.1.South Myrtle Ave, Clearwater, Florida 33756, party of the second part. ,,W ''t T, N E S S E T H, That said party of the first part for and in consideration of the sum of TEN AND 00 /1p�S (810.00) Dollars and other good and valuable considerations to said party of the first part in hand paid by said pahy,o,tthe second part, the receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, has granted, bargained and sold to the said party � -•o6.ths,second part forever, the following described land situate, lying and being Pinellas County, Florida, to -wit: Lot 6, Block 7, CLEARWATER BEACH REVISED, according to the map or plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 11, page 5 of the Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida. Subject to easements, restrictions and reservations of record and taxes for the year 2005 and thereafter. and said party of the first part does hereby fully warrant the title to said land, "end will defend the same against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever. -AN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said party of the first part has caused these presents to be signed in its name by its authorized corporate officer, and its corporate seal to be affixed thereto, the day and year above written. Signed, sealed and delivered In our presence as witnesses: McSmith, Inc. Pr Wnn s Name: a Flor cor oration By: Print Witness Name: fZomM — I J49ec,4— D. ire%711son, President STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF PINELLAS I HEREBY CERTIFY/ that an this day the next above named State and County before me, an officer duly authorized and acting personally appeared D. Lance Wilson, President of McSmith. Inc., a Florida corporation to me known and he is the person described In and who executed the foragoing Instrument, and he acknowledged that he executed the same as such officer to, the purposes therein expressed; that he affixed thereto the official seal of said corporation; and that the said Instrument is the act and deed of said corporation. WITNESS my hand and official seal in the County and State last aforesaid th'.sZ day of!�, 2004. Name. Notary blic Commiss No. 2",MY Comm Ion expires: ' • '3x� _ MYCOM Thomas G Herwm MISSION♦ 00152204 >•....,� Septemberl Exl'IRES •Rf„1 ?•' LONnn'1HPJI,"t,IN 2006; ;v( e Il tAL 1 2000 CM psi dsS O� r I #: 2005028500 BK: 14080 PG: 1014, 01/25/2005 $27.00 D DOC STAMP COLLECTION $11200.00 KEN COUNTY, FL BY DEPUTY CLERK: CLKDUI7 t This document prepared by And after recording return to: John B. Gibbons, Esq. `'' •.... Saxon, Gilmore, Carraway, Gibbonsi -ash & Wilcox, P.A. 201 East Kennedy Boulevard Suite 600 0 at 11:39 AM, RECORDING 3 PAGES BURKE, CLERK OF COURT PINELLAS Tampa, FL 33602 PARCEL I.D. NOS. .,' 05=29 -15- 16362 -007 -0070 "�05- 29 -15- 16362- 007 -0071 -29-1 5 -16362-007-0080 ",05- 29 -15- 16362- 007 -0081 WARRANTY DEED This`Indenture, is made this day of January, 2005, between Pasquale Calderoni, as Trustee ofihe.•- Pasquale Calderoni Revocable Trust, by trust instrument dated June 25, 2001, and Aida .Calderon, as Trustee of the Aida Calderon Revocable Trust, by trust instrument dated June 25, i00P` whose address is 4516 W. North B Street, Tampa, Florida 33609 (together, "Graritar" ), and Panorama on Clearwater Beach, LLC, a Florida limited liability company, virbge:.'address is 483 Mandalay Avenue, Suite 209, Clearwater, Florida 33765, of the County of Pinellas, State of Florida ( "Grantee "). WITNESSETH, that Grantor, for and in consideration of the sutra of Ten Dollars ($10.00), and other good and valuable consideration to Grantor in hand paid by Grantee, the receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, has granted, bargained and sold to Grantee and Grantee's successors and assigns forever, the following described land, situate, lying and being in the County of Pinellas, State of Florida, to wit: SEE EXHIBIT "A" ATTACHED HERETO Grantor does hereby fully warrant the title to said land, and will defend the same against lawful claims of all persons whomsoever. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Grantor has hereunto set its hand and seal the day and year first above written. Witnesses: 1\ • T � ! i/ v SQUAL CALDERONI, AS TRUSTEE OF THE PASQUALE CALDERONI REVOCABLE TRUST, BY TRUST INSTRUMENT DATED JUNE 25, 2001 �1 DEC 01 2000 �r" ° i�[�F�'•tl °��' ""Oil- ."#,i". °��['� r.f,. 0 PINELLAS COUNTY FL OFF. REC. BK 14080 PG 1015 C1 .. . .... ......... ....... . Print Name: 10tVIV'13 - AIDA CALDERONI, AS TRUSTEE OF THE AIDA CALDERON] REVOCABLE TRUST, BY TRUST INSTRUMENT DATED JUNE 25, 2001 Print Name: STATE OP".V�6iiDA . il 1. %..' COUNTYIPF, HILLSBOROUGH Tlaz foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 5 day of January, 2005, by Pasquale Calderoni, as Trustee of the Pasquale Calderoni Revocable Trust, by trust instrument d°june 25, 2001. He is personally known to me or has produced as identification. Zu%u F- P40 Notary Public, State of Florida * Caffl*Wm E*Vft Febwry 08, 200E Print Name: My Commission Expires: STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF HILLSBOROUGH The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this G'1� day of January, 2005, by Aida Calderoni, as Trustee of the Aida Calderoni Revocable Trust, by trust instrument dated June 25, 2001. She is personally known to me or has produced as identification. or Z,*" E. RON WCOMM40mrflo aliq Eqk" Februmy 06.200E e:\caideroni\closdocs\deedfinal.doc Notary Public, State of Florida Print Name: My Commission Expires- 7 r7-7' 01 2008 0 PINELLAS COUNTY FL OFF..REC. BK 14080 PG 1016 10 EXHIBIT "A" ( Lots 7 and 8, Block 71 "VISE P OF CLEARWATER BEACH, according to the map or plat thereo f recorded i Plat Book 11, page 5, of the pubjiq,, records of Pinellas County, Florida. EL DEC 0 1 2098 Ofy O� f EXHIBIT "A" ( Lots 7 and 8, Block 71 "VISE P OF CLEARWATER BEACH, according to the map or plat thereo f recorded i Plat Book 11, page 5, of the pubjiq,, records of Pinellas County, Florida. EL DEC 0 1 2098 Ofy O� 0 I #: 2005494589 BK: 14801 PG: 517, 12/13/2005 at 09:00 AM, RECORDING 2 PAGES $18.50 D DOC STAMP COLLECTION $0.70 KEN BURKE, CLERK OF COURT PINELLAS COUNTY, FL BY DEPUTY CLERK: CLKDMC6 Personal Representative's Deed''. RETURN TO & Gary W. Lyons f tsq. PREPARED BY: McFarland .,Gould, Lyons, Sullivan &'°Kogan, P.A. 311 S, Missouri Avenue Clearwatet,,Florida 33756 Tax Parcel No. 05/29115/16362/007 /0130 Grantor's Name: :Esfit #e of Anthony M. Samarkos, deceased Grantee's Name. , ;:`: `.. vangeline Samarkos Grantee's Name: Michael A. Samarkos Grantee's Name;` Victory Harkey Property.., fess: 20 Kendall Street Clearwater, FL PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE'S DEED This Indenture, made this 1b day of 0__ p Y' A. D., 2005, Between, 'EVANGELINE A SAMARKOS, Personal Representative of the Estate of ANTHONY M. SAMARKOS, deceased, as Decedent's interests may appear (hereinafter referred to as "Grantor "), - AND- EVANGELINE SAMARKOS, an unremarried widow, as to a 50% interest, whose post office address is: 106 Midway Island, Clearwater, FL 33767, MICHAEL A. SAMARKOS, a married man as to a 25% interest, whose post once address is: 944 Oakview Road, Tarpon Springs, FL 34689 and VICTORIA HARKEY, a married woman as to a 25% interest, whose post office address is: 1509 Willow Brook Drive, Palm, Harbor, Fl 34683 (hereinafter referred to as "Grantee "). WITNESSETH, That Grantor, acting under the power and authority granted the Personal Representative under the last Will and Testament of ANTHONY M. SAMARKOS„ deceased, and such Letters ofAdministration dated April 29, 2005 admitted to probate in Pinellas County, Florida, Probate Division, Case No. 05- 3267 -ES3„ for the sum of $10.00 in hand paid, does hereby grant, bargain, sell and convey unto the Grantee and Grantee's heirs and assigns forever, the land situate in the County of Pinellas, State of Florida, to -wit: Lot 13, Block 7, CLEARWATER BEACH REVISED, according to the map or plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 11, page 5, of the Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida. Subject to Real property taxes for the year 2005 and subsequent years: Subject to all easement, reservation, restrictions, and covenants of record. TOGETHER WITH all and singular the tenements, hereditaments, and appurtenances thereunto belonging or in anywise appertaining, and all the right, title, interest, claim and demand whatsoever, which the decedent had at the time of his death, in and to the premises. The undersigned Personal Representative also releases any lien rights that it may have pursuant to Chapter 733, Florida Statutes and warrants against the possibility of a Personal Representative's Lien. 0 0 PINELLAS COUNTY FL OFF. REC. BK 14801 PG 518 TO HAVE AND TO 00LD the same unto the Grantee and Grantee's successors and assigns forever. IN WITNESS., WHEREOF, Grantor has hereunto set Grantor's hand and seal the day and year first above `wrzdten. Witne s #. '1 ..'' ::.n" Signature cW Print Naive`...` W--u EVANGELINE P. SAMARKOS Personal Representative of the Estate of ANTHONY M. SAMARKOS, deceased STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF PINELLAS The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this JO _ day of 2005, by EVANGELINE P. ` SAMARKOS, as Personal Representative of the Estate ofANTHONYM. SAMARKOS, deceased, who is /are pxzsonally know or who has produced a driver's license as identification and who did take an ath. Notary Public KAREN M. ROGERS Mr COMMISSION x oo msas Notary Please Print Name: t"ar", EXPIRES: January 15, 2007 � WdedPruN mryPttkLPrex»�t� My Commission Expires: Commission Number: (SEAL) P:\docs \CLIENTS\40000- 40999\40875.01 Samarkos, Estate of Anthony - Probate\PRDeed 700 N Pinellas.wpd _ � m a. DEC 0 1 2000 OF Ca hirV,"`.'[ a I #: 2006119018 BK: 15024 PG: 1778, 03/31/2006 at 11:19 AM, RECORDING 2 PAGES $18.50 D DOC STAMP COLLECTION $0.70 KEN BURKE, CLERK OF COURT PINELLAS COUNTY, FL BY DEPUTY CLERK: CLKDM04 RETURN TO & Prepared By:. Gary W. Lyons, Esq.,, McFarland, Godtd Lyojvs, Sullivan & Hogan;;P A. 311 S. Missouti Avenue Clearwater, 0L.33756 727 -461 -1111 1a. Grantor's Name: Evangeline Samarkos Grantee's Name:,.:'.., '.,.."Evangeline P. Samarkos, Trustee Tax Parcel No.'., `` 05/29/15/16362/007 /0130 Property Address;.' 20 Kendall Street, Clearwater, Florida QUITCLAIM DEED This Indenture, made this 27"' day of March, A.D. 2006, Between Evangeline Samarkos, an unremarried widow, whose post office address is: 106 Midway Island, Clearwater, FL 33757 (hereinafter referred to as "Grantor'), to. Evangeline R Samarkos, as Trustee of the Evangeline P. Samarkos Revocable Trust under trust dated March 27, 1006whose post office address is: 106 Midway Island, Clearwater, FL 33757 (hereinafter referred to as "Grantee'). WITNESSETH, That said Grantor, in consideration of the sum of TENAND 001100S ($10.00) Dollars and other good and valuable considerations in hand paid by the said Grantee, the receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, has remised, released and quit claimed, and by these presents does remise, release and quitclaim unto the said Grantee all the right, title, interest claim and demand which the said Grantor has in and to the following described lot, piece or parcel of land, situate, lying and being in the County of Pinellas, State of Florida, to -wit: Lot 13, Block 7, CLEARWATER BEACHREVISED, according to the map or plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book I1, page 5, of the Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida, said interest being a 50% interest in this described property. The Grantee, as trustee, has the full power and authority to protect, conserve, sell, convey, lease, encumber, and to otherwise manage and dispose of said real property pursuant to F.S. 689.071. Subject property is not the homestead property of the Grantee. Subject to all Easements, Covenants, Restrictions and Reservations of record and to Real property taxes for the year 2006 and subsequent years. To Have and to Hold the same, together with all and singular the appurtenances thereunto belonging or in anywise appertaining, and all the estate, right, title, interest and claim whatsoever of the said Grantor, either in law or equity, to the only proper use, benefit and behoof of the said Grantee. "Grantor" and "Grantee" are used for singular or plural, as context requires. fz t� Y [' 01 �0� PINELLAS COUNTY FL OFF. REC. BK 15024 PG 1779 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, `Grantor has hereunto set Grantor's hand and seal the day and year first above written. Signed, sealed and delivered in the presence of.- STATE OF BOUNTY OF PINELLAS Thejoregaing instru� as acknowledged before me this 27'R day of March 7.00h, by Evangeline Samarkos who ' r�on lly known to or who has produced a driver's license as identifica an id not take an oath. �µr . Notary Public State of Florida Bart) ;)r;, i Wolodzko My Gnmm;ssion OD460438 an Expires 0811012009 i Notary Public Notary Please Pn ame: My Commission Expires: Commission Number: (SEAL) P: \docs\MlSC\Cathy WhiteVan Vella \GWL \QCD Samarkos to Samarkos TR 20 Kendall.wpd Receipt #: 1200800000000009399 Date: 12/01/2008 12/l/2008 12:08:48PM Line Items: Case No Tran Code Description Revenue Account No Amount Paid FLD2008 -12034 04 Flexible Commercial 001000000341262000 1,205.00 FLD2008 -12034 Fire - Prelim Site Plan 001000000342501000 200.00 DVA2008 -00003 Development Agreement Fee 001000000341262000 1,500.00 Line Item Total: $2,905.00 Payments: Method Payer Bank No Account No Confirm No How Received Amount Paid Check PANORAMA ON CLWR BEACH R_D 3008174 In Person 2,905.00 LLC Payment Total: $2,905.00 t� r.� THIS IS NOT A PERMIT. This is a receipt for an application for a permit. This application will be reviewed and you will be notified as to the outcome of the application. Page 1 of I cRcccipt.rpt • CITY ATTORINEY S OFFICE VIA FEDEX CITY OF CLEARWATER POST OFFICE BOX 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758 -4748 CITY HAIL, 112 SOUTH OSCEOLA AvENTUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562 -4010 FAx (727) 562 -4021 July 22, 2009 Robert S. Cohen Director and Chief Judge Division of Administrative Hearings 1230 Apalachee Parkway Tallahassee, Florida 32399 -3060 RE: 20 Kendall Street, Appeal of Community Development Board (CDB) Decision of Case No. FDL 2008 - 12034: Appeal No. APP2009 -00004 Dear Judge Cohen: Enclosed are two copies of the following items regarding the above - referenced case before the Community Development Board, whose decision is being appealed by 20 Kendall Street. 1. Planning Department file with Flexible Development Application, correspondence, including agenda packet for CDB meeting and Appeal Application; 2'. (One) DVD recording of the Community Development Board June 16, 2009 hearing; 3. Photocopy of transcript of minutes and Notice of Community Development Board Public Hearings of the Clearwater Community Development Board June 16, 2009, meeting provided by the City Clerk's office. For the convenience of the parties and witnesses please schedule the hearing in Clearwater. The Council Chambers on the third floor of City Hall, 112 South Osceola Avenue, Clearwater, Florida is usually available. You may contact Diane Manni, City Manager's Office at (727) 562 -4042 to arrange a location. Ink "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOVER° f • Robert S. Cohen, Director and Chief Judge Division of Administrative Hearings Page Two July 22, 2009 Please advise the parties as soon as an administrative law judge is assigned to this case. Very truly yours, Leslie K. Dougall- . s Assistant City Attorney LDS /grh Enclosures Cc: Patricia M. Stough, Appellant 1634 San Roy Drive Dunedin, FL 34698 Telephone: 727 -733 -3769 Gina K. Grimes, Esquire Hill, Ward and Henderson P.A. 3700 Bank of America Plaza 101 East Kennedy Boulevard Tampa, FL 33602 -5195 Telephone: 813- 221 -3900 Attorney for Community Development Board ,Michael Delk Director of Planning City of Clearwater Cynthia E. Goudeau City Clerk City of Clearwater r Li PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES CITY OF CLE.',PWATER • Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Wednesday, August 19, 2009 9:18 AM To: WAL PATEL' Cc: Kurleman, Scott Subject: Ambiance Hotel - license to sell alcohol Kal — i While I was not the case planner for your proposed hotel, I have read the staff report and see there is a bar /lounge proposed on the 4`" floor as an amenity for the hotel guests. There is a State license from the Department of Professional and Business Regulation, Division of Restaurant and Alcohol, that you will need to obtain their application form and complete. I assume you will be applying for a 4COP license to sell beer, wine and liquor for on- premise consumption. Prior to submitting to the State, you will need to bring the completed application form to our office for signoff. There. is no fee for such review /signoff by the City and is usually a walk - through signoff at the Zoning counter. Filling out the application at this time would be premature, as you need to submit for building permits and be under construction before the Planning Department would sign off on the application to the State. The City's Business Tax Receipt (occupational license), which is also necessary prior to opening the hotel, would also need to indicate the bar /lounge as part of the hotel with the State license for the alcohol sales listed. Wayne From: KAL PATEL [mailto:kalshlmk @yahoo.com] Sent: Tuesday, August 18, 2009 6:31 PM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: Ambiance Hotel - licence to sell alcohol Good Afternoon Wayne: Can you guide me in the process of obtaining a licence to sell alcohol in the Hotel we are about to build. I have researched this and have come up with no best avenue. So I thought of you. An help would be appreciated. Regards, Kal Patel Ambiance Hotel • Planning Department 100 South Myrtle Avenue d1 Telephone: 7271562 4567 a ~ Fax: 727 - 562 -4576 u- 20 KENDALL ST APP2009 -00004 I � Zoning: T atlas# 258A • SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION ORIGINAL REED • SUBMIT 12 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION q • SUBMIT APPLICATION FEE $ SOQ ,F� a00� , I ZO i JUL Q 1 2009 - APPEAL APPLICATION PLANNING Level One and Level Two Reviews (Revised 03/29/01) — YLbASb'1'YFE UK F.RlN'1'- APPLICATIOWNOTICE OF APPEAL (Code Section 4 -502.A & B) An appeal of a level one approval (flexible standard) may be initiated by a property owner abutting the property which is the subject of the approval within seven days of the date the development order is issued. The filing of an application/ notice of appeal shall stay the effect of the decision pending the final determination of the case. An application/ notice of appeal of appeal of any decision of the city, as provided in Section 4 -501, may be initiated by the applicant or any person granted party status within 14 days of the decision. Such application shall be filed with the city clerk in a form specified by the community development coordinator identifying with specificity the basis for the appeal and accompanied by a fee as required by Section 4- 202.E. The filing of an application/ notice of appeal shall stay the effect of the decision pending the final determination of the case. A. APPELLANT AND AGENT INFORMATION: APPELLANT NAME: r_o&-Tre %4c;A. JM • cST�y }( MAILING ADDRESS :�(c3¢ £��4wJ /2�S! IQ�PIVE PHONE NUMBER: (72.7 733 -377 e.q FAX NUMBER: 727 _7 7e. Q AGENT NAME: MAILING ADDRESS: PHONE NUMBER: FAX NUMBER: B. APPEAL INFORMATION CHECK THE SPECIFIC APPEAL: Appeals to the Community Development Board ❑ Orders, requirements, decisions or determinations made by an administrative official in the administration of the development code, except for enforcement actions. ❑ Administrative interpretations of the development code ❑ Level One (Flexible and Minimum Standard) approval decisions ❑ Denials of any permit or license issued under the provisions of this Code _Appeals to a hearing officer Ot Decisions of the community development board regarding level two approvals ❑ Decisions of the community development board regarding level one approvals ❑ OTHER (as allowed by Code) ADDRESS OF SUBJECT APPEAL (if applicable): ZQ LCr_ C L.W IR S&C" fnt2a 33 76' SPECIFIC CASE NUMBER TO BE APPEALED (if applicable): 1'1-0 2068 12034-- DATE OF DECISION: Page 1 of 2 - Appeal Application (Level One and Level Two Reviews)- City of Clearwater C. BASIS OF APPEAL: Explain in detail the basis for the appeal. Use additional sheets if necessary. D. SIGNATURE: I, the undersigned, acknowledge that all representations made in this STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS � application are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge. Sv orn to and subscribed before a this (2 day of A.D. t� to me and/or by U who is rsonal y kno has produced as identification. Signature of property Aner or repre ative Nota public, My commission expires: IIMS2IPDSIPlannin De artmentW lication Formsldevelo ment reviewlA �'' ''• 9 p Pp p ppeal Application.doc 4• in S. Beekson '+ *Commission # DD520973 �°•,. e Expires February 21, 2010 Bonded Troy FAin • I@p WCO, Ina 800 - 3857019 Page 2 of 2 — Appeal Application (Level One and Level Two Reviews)— City of Clearwater • FLD2008 -12034 20 Kendall Street June 16 Community Development Board (CDB) Appeal. • The basis for this appeal includes but is not limited to the following: JUL b 1 `9 Building exceeds code requirements and does not meet standards for flexibility. Section 2 -803 Flexible Development I. Overnight Accommodations and Comprehensive Infill redevelopment requirements (i.e. "will not reduce the fair market value of abutting properties ") Floor Area Ratio is not in compliance with the County Land Use Plan. (Ordinance No. 07 =50.) -Building setback allowances did not-include "additional" required ste -back. Beach by'Design Section AA.a.3 There are no dimensions of the building on the floor plans. The building Volume is not within the design standards of Beach by Design i.e. 75% above 45' box. No sidewalk provided along Kendall Street, with reduced setback, '"an improved site -plan, landscaping area in excess of minimum required area and or improved design and appearance are required for flexibility. Further Beach by Design page 67, D. Setbacks states, that the area between the building and edge of pavement shall be sufficiently wide to create a pedestrian - friendly environment. Structure to edge of ROW should be 12'. ADA parking and path of travel not provided to the Street Florida Building Code, Building Type needs to be "IB" due to size, and height. "IB" with a 23' distance to the property line is allowed only 45% "unprotected "openings within the wall. The window areas exceed 45 % on the east and west elevations. Parking garage openings within 10'. of the property line need to have protected openings max 15 %. Beach by design requires 60% windows or architectural ornamentation. The development agreement allows for _(2) years from approval to .get permit as opposed to the codified (1) year. The city does not have a method to monitor the room cost to assure that this will be a mid -price product. Thus the room allocation from the Hotel Density Reserve is questionable. Maximum height cannot be increased to accommodate hotel rooms from the reserve. Beach by design p. 55. CBD Approved height is 72'-0" actual height is 75 "4 ". Civil plans show 1St finish floor elevation to be 6.5' to 7.0' NAVD. Building elevation drawings Indicate height to be 72' -0 ", "calculations" show height to be 75 "-4 "" from NAVD 13.0. • • 5 4 .�r Receipt #: 1200900000000004513 Date: 07/01/2009 ,:�51c, 7/l/2009 12:31:30PM Line Items: Case No Tran Code Description Revenue Account No Amount Paid CSP2009 -00005 Comprehensive Sign Program FLD2009 -07021 04 Flexible Commercial FLD2009 -07021 Fire - Prelim Site Plan MIS2009 -07002 Board of Adjustment & Appeals 001000000341262000 001000000341262000 001000000342501000 001000000322108000 Line Item Total: 400.00 1,005.00 200.00 130.00 $1,735.00 Payments: Method Payer Bank No Account No Confirm No How Received Amount Paid Check CLWR YACHT CLUB R D 06709 Check CLWR YACHT CLUB R_D 06711 Check CLWR YACHT CLUB R D 06710 Check CLWR YACHT CLUB R D 06712 In Person 400.00 In Person 200.00 In Person 1,005.00 In Person 130.00 Payment Total: $1,735.00 THIS IS NOT A PERMIT. This is a receipt for an application for a permit. This application will be reviewed and you will be notified as to the outcome of the application. Page 1 of 1 cRcccipt.IPt • `Clearwater Fax Cover Sheet To: Legal Leslie Dougale -sides Fax: 4021 Phone: From: Sherry Watkins Date: July 2, 2009 Sub�ect Appeal Application 20 Kendall Message: Number of Pages including this page • City of Clearwater Planning Department 100 S. Myrtle Ave., 2nd Floor Clearwater, FL 33756 Telephone: (727) 562 -4567 Fax: (727) 562 -4865 • June 17, 2009 The Consus Group, LLC Ed Hooper P.O. Box 4268 Clearwater, FL 33758 1] RE: Development Order - Case FLD2008 -12034 (Related to DVA2008- 00003) 20 Kendall Street Dear Mr. Hooper: This letter constitutes a Development Order pursuant to Section 4- 206.D.6 of the Community Development Code. On June 16, 2009, the Community Development Board reviewed your request for (1) Flexible Development approval to permit an 88 -room overnight accommodation use in the Tourist (T) District with a reduction to lot width along Kendall Street from 150 feet to 100 feet (south side), a reduction to the front (south) setback from 15 feet to 10.8 feet (to proposed building) and zero feet (to proposed sidewalk), a reduction to the front (north) setback from 15 feet to 10 feet (to proposed building) and zero feet (to proposed pavement), a reduction to the side (west) setback from 10 feet to five feet (to proposed building) and zero feet (to proposed pavement), a reduction to the side (east) setback from 10 feet to five feet (to proposed building), a reduction to the rear (south) setback from 20 feet to five feet (to proposed building), and an increase to the building height from 35 feet to 72 feet (to top of roof deck) and 86.5 feet (to elevator equipment), under the provisions of Community Development Code (CDC) Section 2- 803.I, and approval of a two -year development order; and (2) Increase of the permitted density by the allocation of 58 overnight accommodation units from the Hotel Density Reserve created pursuant to Beach by Design. The Community Development Board (CDB) APPROVED the application with the following Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and Conditions of Approval: Findings of Fact: 1. The 0.60 acres is located between the south side of Avalon Street and the north side of Kendall Street approximately 150 west of Mandalay Avenue; 2. The site is comprised of eight parcels, two on the north side of Kendall Street and six on the south side of Avalon Street; 0 0 3. The proposal is to construct an 88 -unit overnight accommodation use at a density of 150 units /acre, which includes the allocation of 58 units from the Hotel Density Reserve under Beach by Design; 4. A companion Development Agreement (DVA2008- 00003) that must be approved by City Council is also on this CDB agenda is, providing for the allocation of the 58 units from the Hotel Density Reserve; 5. The hotel is proposed at a height of 72 feet from the Base Flood Elevation (BFE) to the roof deck; 6. The first four levels of the hotel will provide a total of 94 valet only parking spaces, with driveway access on Kendall Street; 7. The proposal includes setback reductions from all property lines; and 8. There are no outstanding Code Enforcement issues associated with the subject property. Conclusions of Law: 1. That the development proposal is consistent with the Standards as per Tables 2 -801.1 and 2- 803 of the Community Development Code; 2. That the development proposal is consistent with the Flexibility criteria as per Section 2- 803.I of the Community Development Code; 3. That the development proposal is consistent with the General Standards for Level Two Approvals as per Section 3 -913 of the Community Development Code; 4. That the development proposal is consistent with the Design Guidelines of Beach by Design; and 5. The proposal is compatible with the adjacent land uses. Condition of Approval: 1. That approval of this Flexible Development case is subject to the approval of a Development Agreement with the City (Case DVA2008- 00003); 2. That application for a building permit to construct the approved project be submitted no later than June 16, 2011, unless time extensions are granted pursuant to CDC Section 4 -407; 3. That, prior to the issuance of any permit, a Declaration of Unity of Title be recorded in the public records; 4. That the final design and color of the buildings be consistent with the elevations approved by the CDB; 5. That the books and records pertaining to use of each hotel room be open for inspection by authorized representatives of the City, upon reasonable notice, in order to confirm compliance with the Hotel Density Reserve criteria of Beach by Design as allowed by general law; 6. That, prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy, all utility and communication lines be placed underground and electric panels and boxes be painted the same color as the building; 7. That, prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy, an easement be recorded in the public records for any encroachments on the subject property; 8. That any applicable Public Art and Design Impact Fee be paid prior to the issuance of any permits; 9. That all Parks and Recreation fees be paid prior to the issuance of any permits; and 0 0 10. That, prior to the issuance of any permit, all requirements of General Engineering, Stormwater Engineering, Traffic Engineering and the Fire Department be addressed. Pursuant to Section 4 -407, an application for a building permit or other approvals shall be made within two years of the date of Flexible Development approval (June 16, 2011). All required certificates of occupancy shall be obtained within two years of the date of issuance of the initial building permit. The building_ permit must be obtained within six months of the initial permit qpplication. This timeframe to obtain the initial building permit may be extended for an additional six months for cause by the Community Development Coordinator. Time frames do not change with successive owners. The Community Development Coordinator may grant an extension of time for the Flexible Development approval for a period not to exceed one year and only within the original period of validity. The issuance of this Development Order does not relieve you of the necessity to obtain any building permits or pay any impact fees that may be required. In order to facilitate the issuance of any permit or license affected by this approval, please bring a copy of this letter with you when applying for any permits or licenses that require this prior development approval. Additionally, an appeal of a Level Two approval (Flexible Development) may be initiated pursuant to Section 4 -502.13 by the applicant or by any person granted party status within 14 days of the date of the CDB meeting. The filing of an application/notice of appeal shall stay the effect of the decision pending the final determination of the case. The appeal period for your case expires on June 30, 2009 (14 days from the date of the CDB meeting). If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call A. Scott Kurleman, Planner I11, at 727- 562 -4553. You can access zoning information for parcels within the City through our website: www.nwLclearwate.r.coi-.n/gov/dgpts/planiiin . Sincerely, Michael Delk, AICP Planning Director S:\Planning Department \C D B\FLEX (FLD) \Inactive Or Finished Applications\Kendall S 20 - Ambiance (T) - 2009.06 - Approved - SK\Kendall St - 20 - Ambiance Hotel - Development Order.Doc 0 0 Y�p low %Ab i I r� ff/M1.. Flow it ' - �! a � c z j ' = a E F AERIAL MAP C,wne -: 'arorama on Clearwater Beach, LLC and c,:ise: FLD2008 -12034 verge* -L-, aamarkos, as Trustee of the DVA2008- 00003 v--ngeli-L-- Scmankos Rev Trust U,4D 3/27/06, hli _ hael A .3amarkos &'✓icioria -1ar<e Site: 20 Kendal a;lreet Pr-Doe-ty Size: .60 Ares P N: 05- 29 -15 -16 =62)07 -0050 Aas Page: 258A 05- 29- 15- 16.62 -- )07 -0060 05-29-15-16-- 62-)07-0070 05- 29- 15 -16= 62-)07-0071 05-29- 15 -16= 62-)07-0080 05- 29- 15 -16= 62-)07-0081 35-29-15-16-- 62-)07-0140 055-229-15-16-- 62-)07-0130 Ill 0 0 ZONING MAP O 1 1 7 6 1 8 1 643 3 648 9 I 14 13 4 11 110 - b d 2 L °D� X40 63ZS t38 1 I a Q 6491 2 z GLENDALE ST Q 15 � GULF 1— T' n 94146 l 1 L J 631 636 :n N 1 � 13 OF 1q 3 10 629 2 I 9634 5 632 a 1 I MEXICO 619 3� 11 110 7 n 40 ^ rn o, n 62 O a 03436 3 N N1 - - - 622 4 5 6 7 I8 2 60 —�— 15 114 13 12 11 � — — — I I 611 T 10 �I I N N N �9z I I 9 1 OS /R ►'� III 1 h i 0) 1 6 3 8 I I 5 4 - n 603 8 5 7 8 1 I I � a 3 - 3 6p0 7 2 r 14 1 4 605 11 2 3 15 13 12 111 , 1 A 60 583 6 M g 10 5T4 5 g Q 579 r- -1I L 16362 1 534 603 - - 581 d I N 579 9 I 5 5 _ _ �, r - 57 L �� 1 3 5 602 I — — r —I —1 1 _55 e0 a Lill- 1 � 905(5) 531 OSA? g j 532 P (16) ZONING MAP Owner: Panorama on Clearwater Beach, LLC and Case: FLD2008 -12034 Evangeline P. Samarkos, as Trustee of the DVA2008 -00003 Evangeline P Samarkos Rev Trust UAD 3/27/06, Michael A Samarkos & Victoria Harkey Site: 20 Kendall Street Property Size: .60 Acres PIN: 05- 29 -15- 16362- 007 -0050 Atlas Page: 258A 05- 29- 15- 16362- 007 -0060 05- 29- 15- 16362- 007 -0070 05- 29- 15- 16362- 007 -0071 05- 29- 15- 16362- 007 -0080 05- 29- 15- 16362- 007 -0081 05- 29- 15- 16362- 007 -0140 05- 29- 15- 16362- 007 -0130 — 3 1 4 15 6 17 8 19 2 I— -1 — a- — to — 15 1 14 13 12 11 11110 1 a I N I r- -1I L 16362 1 534 603 - - 581 d I N 579 9 I 5 5 _ _ �, r - 57 L �� 1 3 5 602 I — — r —I —1 1 _55 e0 a Lill- 1 � 905(5) 531 OSA? g j 532 P (16) ZONING MAP Owner: Panorama on Clearwater Beach, LLC and Case: FLD2008 -12034 Evangeline P. Samarkos, as Trustee of the DVA2008 -00003 Evangeline P Samarkos Rev Trust UAD 3/27/06, Michael A Samarkos & Victoria Harkey Site: 20 Kendall Street Property Size: .60 Acres PIN: 05- 29 -15- 16362- 007 -0050 Atlas Page: 258A 05- 29- 15- 16362- 007 -0060 05- 29- 15- 16362- 007 -0070 05- 29- 15- 16362- 007 -0071 05- 29- 15- 16362- 007 -0080 05- 29- 15- 16362- 007 -0081 05- 29- 15- 16362- 007 -0140 05- 29- 15- 16362- 007 -0130 0 0 EXISTING CONDITIONS MAP 1 16 I 7 I a Y. 643 3 648 VI 4 13 11 110 00 2 _ L°'� w I N40 w N — xa638 1 I a Q 6491 GLENDALE ST Q 15 GULF 94146 s ~ 15 (— 631 I 636 Q) 1 Z 477 OF 14 3 10 629 2 9634 632 MEXICO 619 3 - - -'IF 1 9 606 609 1 of a' s = 605 —_ 4 5 7 1 8 n 603 8 2 r 14 1 04 Q 605 I I L J L °o 7 — 15 13 12 1 11 1 1 C 601 585 1 I " N M Q 583 6 10 5x84 D 581 ,5 C 579 �� 3 — 2 a 5 6 I 7 I8 6 620 I M I � L — 4 — — 622 5 — 6 — I I B O 7 1 1 9 03436 1___ — —� 0a 611 so 10 — �— 15 I 14 113 DI N �f NN 11 N 'I 1Q 072 610 - - -'IF 1 9 606 609 1 of a' s = 605 —_ 4 5 7 1 8 n 603 8 2 r 14 1 04 Q 605 I I L J L °o 7 — 15 13 12 1 11 1 1 C 601 585 1 I " N M Q 583 6 10 5x84 D 581 ,5 C 579 I— ---I L6362 1 534 603 581 dO 55799 I 5 L 5713 5 — — — 57 g I 7 6 80 4 60 L`I 60 1 BAY ESPLANADE L_54792 100 531 v h s 8 532 g (16) EXISTING CONDITIONS MAP �� 1 M — 3 14 15 8 17 819 2 I— 3/27/06, Michael A Samarkos & Victoria to- 15 1 14 1 12 11 1° 00 N I M I— ---I L6362 1 534 603 581 dO 55799 I 5 L 5713 5 — — — 57 g I 7 6 80 4 60 L`I 60 1 BAY ESPLANADE L_54792 100 531 v h s 8 532 g (16) EXISTING CONDITIONS MAP Owner: Panorama on Clearwater Beach, LLC and Case: FLD2008 -12034 Evangeline P. Samarkos, as Trustee of the DVA2008 -00003 Evangeline P Samarkos Rev Trust UAD 3/27/06, Michael A Samarkos & Victoria Harkey Site: 20 Kendall Street Property Size: .60 Acres PIN: 05- 29 -15- 16362- 007 -0050 Atlas Page: 258A 05- 29- 15- 16362- 007 -0060 05- 29- 15- 16362- 007 -0070 05- 29- 15- 16362- 007 -0071 05- 29- 15- 16362- 007 -0080 05- 29- 15- 16362- 007 -0081 05 -29 -15 -16362 -007 -0140 05- 29- 15- 16362- 007 -0130 0 9 LOCATION MAP �0 Q w w IRIS z � m ASTER O ACAC;IA�RT SOMERSET ST 0 CAMBRIA w D Inl Fwu n 0 GLENDALE PROJECT I ROYAL AY HpR� SITE HEILWOOD BAY N !r w DO KE D L Juanita Z O D BAY ESPLANADE �vl ROCKAWAY Ambler S BAYMONT ST w o Q > SKIFF SAN MgRCO n . POINT PAPAYA ST Q w DO LOCATION MAP Owner: Panorama on Clearwater Beach, LLC and Case: FLD2008 -12034 Evangeline P. Samarkos, as Trustee of the DVA2008 -00003 Evangeline P Samarkos Rev Trust UAD 3/27/06, Michael A Samarkos & Victoria Harkey Site: 20 Kendall Street Property Size: .60 Acres PIN: 05- 29- 15- 16362- 007 -0050 Atlas Page: 258A 05- 29- 15- 16362- 007 -0060 05- 29- 15- 16362- 007 -0070 05- 29- 15- 16362- 007 -0071 05- 29- 15- 16362- 007 -0080 05- 29- 15- 16362- 007 -0081 05- 29- 15- 16362- 007 -0140 05- 29- 15- 16362- 007 -0130 0 0 Subject vacant property looking north. Subject vacant property looking south. City parking lot and attached dwellings to the north. =a Vacation rentals to the north. Restaurant and attached dwellings to the east. 20 Kendall Street �J FLD2008 -12034 DVA2008 -00003 • • Rear of the b J ding -o the e ist of the subject property. Subject property is to the west of the above building. City parking lotto frtc Hest cf the subject property. Vacation rentals to the east of Kendall Street. 20 Kendall Street FLD2008 -12034 DVA2008 -00003 0 9 Map Request Planner Name: A. Scott Kurleman Case Number: FLD2008 -12034 Date Requested: 5/15/2009 Date Requested for (date): 5/22/2009 Maps Requested ® Location Map ® Aerial Map ® Zoning Map ® Existing Surrounding Uses Map Required Documents to be submitted to Engineering ® Legal Description tiF,46AL RIZom SUyc, ,,7 r3Y EdE SL/Lvq ® Survey VC4 0 0000z>/ ® Map with Proposed Site Highlighted IN ADDITION TO THE REQUESTED MAPS, PLEASE PROVIDE VERIFICATION THAT THE LEGAL DESCRIPTION WE HAVE PROVIDED IS CORREXature CITE. Thomas Mahony, Geographic Technology Manager S LV (--Jj Map N ame Owner: Panorama on Clearwater Beach, LLC and Case: FLD2008 -12034 Evangeline P. Samarkos, as Trustee of the Evangeline P Samarkos Rev Trust UAD 3/27/06, Michael A Samarkos & Victoria Harkey Site: 20 Kendall Street Property Size: .62 Acres PIN: 05- 29 -15- 16362- 007 -0050 Atlas Page: 258A 05- 29- 15- 16362- 007 -0060 05- 29 -15- 16362 - 007 -0070 05- 29- 15- 16362- 007 -0071 05- 29- 15- 16362- 007 -0080 05- 29- 15- 16362- 007 -0081 05- 29- 15- 16362- 007 -0140 05- 29- 15- 16362- 007 -0130 9 0 0 0 0 • E 0 6 m 0 0 0 0 EXHIBIT "A" Legal Description Lots 5, 6, 7, 8, 13 and 14, Block 7, REVISED MAP OF CLEARWATER BEACH, according to the plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 11, Page 5 of the Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida. Parcel Numbers Owned by Panorama on Clearwater Beach, LLC: 05/29115/16362/007 /0050 05/29/15/16362/007 /0060 05/29/15/16362/007 /0070 05/29115/16362/007 /0071 05/29/15/16362/007 /0080 05/29115/16362/00710081 05/29/15/16362/00710140 Owned by Evangeline P. Samarkos, as Trustee of the Evangeline P. Samarkos Revocable Trust, UAD 3127106, Michael A. Samarkos and Victoria Harkey: 05/29115/16362/007 /0130 0- 0� 0 Aj ®r-- u �w f� 0 • EXHIBIT "B" TO FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION FOR COMPREHENSIVE INFILL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT .Ambiance /Hotel Indigo ORIGINAL 20 Kendall Street iRE-CFNED aJJ Section B. Description of Request PB_ANINING DEPAR MPNT UY OF CLEARWATER Request The Applicant, Panorama on Clearwater Beach, LLC, proposes to redevelop the property with an 88 -unit hotel, including 58 units from the Beach by Design Hotel Density Reserve. The subject pro,perty is an aggregate of 0.6 acre comprised of eight parcels located between Kendall Street and Avalon Street approximately 150 feet west of Mandalay Avenue. Specifically, the Applicant requests flexible development approval to permit 90 overnight accommodation units in the Tourist (T) District, which includes an increase in density of 60 overnight accommodation units from the Beach by Design Hotel Density Reserve, with a. a Lot Area of 26,076 square feet-, b. a Lot Width of 200 -feet on Avalon Street and 100' on Kendall Street; c. a maximum height of 74' -4" (above BFE) to top of precast plank at roof; d. a front (south) setback along Kendall Street of 10.8' to building and 3' to pavement (sidewalk), where 15' is required by Code-, e. a front (north) setback along Avalon of 10' to building and 5' to pavement (dumpster pad), where 15' is required by Code; f. A side (west) setback of S to building and 0' to pavement (concrete pad), where 10' is required by Code-, g. A side (east) setback of 5' to building where 10' is required by Code; h. A rear (south adjoining Lot 12) setback of 5' to building where 10' is required by Code; i. Flexibility to minimum standards for sight visibility triangles on Kendall Street-, j. 94 Code - compliant parking spaces where 88 are required by Code; and 171 k. Approval of a two -year development order; ORIGINAL RECEIVED PLANNING ®E�'?. RWpe�1 CITY OF CLEP',iRWAtO as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2 -803.0 of the Code. Simultaneously with this request, the applicant has submitted a Development Agreement application seeking approval of a proposed Development Agreement setting forth the terms of the project's use of 58 rooms from the Beach by Design Hotel Density Reserve. History The property is the former site of several single - family and multi - family residences and small hotels, built as early as the 1920s, most of which have been demolished. On April 19, 2005, the Community Development Board approved Ambiance on White Sands, a 15 -unit condominium project (FLD2005- 01007) to be constructed on the majority of the current site (Lot 13 excluded), which included approval of setback reductions and a height increase. Due to changes in the real estate market following the approval, the proposed project was not marketable and the development approvals expired. The Applicant now proposes a gy- room hotel and the project site incorporates additional land (Lot 13), which the Applicant has under contract. Proposed Use The Applicant proposes to redevelop the site with a hotel consisting of 88 overnight accommodation units including both traditional hotel units and fractional share units and to enter into a Development Agreement with the City. The proposed beachfront hotel will include a restaurant /bar and a small meeting room for guest use. Section D. Written Submittal Requirements General Applicability Criteria: 1) The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. West: The property is bounded on the west by a parcel owned by the City of Clearwater, which is currently used for parking. North: The adjacent property to the north across Avalon is also City of Clearwater property (a metered parking lot) along the beachfront, with duplexes in the middle of the street and office use on Mandalay Avenue. East: The property is bounded on the east by mixed use — motel, multi - family residential, office and retail. 2 aRfGoM RECEIVED 20Q9 PLANNING DEPARTV-4flT C OF CL AR%k E,R South: The property located to the south across Kendall reet is e al m Pavilion restaurant on the beach, a 24 -unit motel in the middle of the street and the Hess station /convenience store on Mandalay. The scale, bulk, coverage and density of the proposed project are in keeping with the Design Guidelines set forth in Beach by Design for the Old Florida District and for projects including approvals of hotel density reserve units. Please see the more detailed discussion of these criteria in response to Comprehensive Infill Criteria No. 6.b. in this exhibit. 2) The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. The proposed project will enhance this area of the beach in a number of ways, including: (1) Superior architectural design and landscaping which will visually enhance the neighborhood. (2) Incorporation of public sidewalks around the property and pedestrian access to the beach. (3) Construction which meets current building codes. (4) Provision of adequate parking for the entire project on site. The parking will have adequate stacking space and loading area, in order to eliminate any traffic congestion at the site and eliminate potential off -site parking in public lots. The parking is designed to accommodate staff, guests, and overnight visitors, as well as provide adequate space for taxis and airport shuttles: - (5) The property value will significantly increase. (6) The guests of the proposed hotel will be potential clientele for nearby restaurants and retail businesses. 3) The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use. With regard to health, safety and welfare, the proposed development and structure will comply as required with applicable codes including the Florida Building Code, the Life Safety Code and the Florida Fire Prevention Code. 4) The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. The Applicant has included in this submittal a traffic assessment prepared by Gulf Coast Consulting, Inc. which indicates that traffic impacts will be minimal. The Applicant proposes 94 parking spaces where 88 spaces are required by Code. Adequate parking will insure that guests will not have to wait for spaces or 3 circle the garage looking for a parking space, therefore, allowing traffic to flow smoothly into the parking garage off Kendall Street. A Parking Study prepared by Gulf Coast Consulting, Inc. included with this submittal evidences that the proposed spaces will adequately accommodate both guests and employees of the project. 5) The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. The property is located within the "Old Florida District" of Clearwater Beach, which Beach by Design describes as an area of transition between resort uses in the Central Beach to the low intensity residential neighborhoods to the north. The proposed hotel project is appropriate for this transition area, as the site is located between retail uses to the south and multi - family residential to the north with other smaller motels in the area. The proposed hotel will be a nice amenity for residents of the north beach who may wish to have out -of -town guests stay there. 6) The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts on adjacent properties. The proposed redevelopment project will improve the visual appeal as viewed from Mandalay Avenue and the beach. The architectural style integrates a post modern design which is appropriate and aesthetically pleasing for this beachfront p rope rty -. As previously discussed, more than adequate parking spaces will keep vehicles off of the street which will enhance and encourage the flow of pedestrians from Mandalay Avenue to the beach, to the site or other retail properties to the south. Vehicular access to the hotel is solely on Kendall Street so as not to create additional traffic on Avalon Street, which is of a more residential character. The proposed trash collection area is screened at the grade level so as not to impact passersby. The swimming pool is located at the northwest corner of the structure on the fourth level. It is an "infinity edge" configuration flowing over two sides of the building fagade. This location, in addition to providing a visual enhancement to passersby, minimizes the potential noise impact to those areas on the north side of the project. ORIGII' A ReCEIVED PLANNINIG D � R}F 4 CITY' OF CL &\R4mA"eR • Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project Criteria: 1. The development or redevelopment is otherwise impractical without deviations from the use and /or development standards set forth in this zoning district. The proposed deviations from Code, which are discussed in detail below, are necessary and minimal and without which the project cannot be constructed at this location. The Applicant has designed the proposed redevelopment project to comply with Beach by Design guidelines to the fullest extent possible. The proposed redevelopment of this site into a hotel meets the City's vision of adding hotel rooms to Clearwater Beach specifically, mid -sized hotel projects, and is also consistent with the nature of the Old Florida District as described in Beach by Design as a transition area. Setbacks The previously approved project (FLD2005- 01007) also included relief for building setbacks (10' to building on the north and south, 7' to building on the west and 3' to building on the east). The relief sought from setbacks is required due to the property having two street frontages on Avalon and Kendall Streets, although the project is using only Kendall Street for access. The requested setback relief is within the parameters set forth in Section II.A.4 of Beach by Design regarding flexibility of setbacks in the Old Florida District. Sight Visibility Triangles As to the applicant's request for flexibility with regard to sight visibility triangles on Kendall Street, the applicant proposes to install safety measures (such as mirrors and signage) to insure adequate visibility for the safety of motorists and pedestrians entering and exiting the garage. Two -Year Development Order The Applicant requests a two -year development order due to market conditions. 2. The development or redevelopment will be consistent with the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan, as well as with the general purpose, intent and basic planning objectives of this Code, and with the intent and purpose of this zoning district. Overnight accommodations are allowed in the "Tourist" zoning district. Primary uses in the "Resort Facilities High" land use category are "high density residential /overnight accommodation." The site is located in the Old Florida District of Beach by Design which supports development of new overnight accommodations. 060 -IN& RECEIVED X09 IT t CITY OF CL RWA� ER 3. The development or redevelopment will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of surrounding properties. The proposed project is compatible with the neighborhood, as is more particularly discussed in General Applicability Criteria 1 and Comprehensive Infill Criteria 4 below, and will not impede other development. The improvement of the site will pave the way for future redevelopment and set an example of style and quality architecture envisioned by Beach by Design. 4. Adjoining properties will not suffer substantial detriment as a result of the proposed development. West: The property is bounded on the west by a parcel owned by the City of Clearwater, which is currently used for parking. North- The adjacent property to the north across Avalon is also City of Clearwater property (a metered parking lot) along the beachfront, with duplexes in the middle of the street and office use on Mandalay Avenue. East: The property is bounded on the east by mixed use — motel, multi - family residential, office and retail. South: The property located to the south across Kendall Street is the Palm Pavilion restaurant on the beach, a 24 -unit motel in the middle of the street and the Hess station /convenience store on Mandalay. 5. The proposed use shall otherwise. be permitted. by the underlying future land use category, be compatible with adjacent land uses, will not substantially alter the essential use characteristics of the neighborhood; and shall demonstrate compliance with one or more of the following objectives: y��F , LU a. The proposed use is permitted in this zoning district as a minimum standard, flexible standard or flexible development use; b. The proposed use would be a significant economic contributor to the City's economic base by diversifying the local economy or by creating jobs; G. The development proposal accommodates the expansion or redevelopment of an existing economic contributor; d. The proposed, use provides for the provision of affordable housing; e. The proposed use provides for development or redevelopment in an area that is characterized by other similar development and where a C� 0 0 land use plan amendment and rezoning would result in a spot land use or zoning designation; or f. The proposed use provides for the development of a new, and/or preservation of a working waterfront use. Overnight accommodations are permitted by the "Resort Facilities High" land use category and in the "Tourist" zoning district as a minimum standard, flexible standard and flexible use. Redevelopment of Clearwater Beach is a significant economic contributor to the City. The proposed hotel is an economic contributor by increasing the number of tourists to Clearwater Beach and encouraging patronization of local businesses. The proposed project will generate new jobs in the City of Clearwater as it is expected to employ approximately 15 persons. The proposed use as overnight accommodations is supported by the Old Florida District. As previously discussed in General Applicability Criteria 1 and Comprehensive Infill Criteria 4 the proposed project is compatible with the surrounding uses. 6. Flexibility with regard to use, lot width, required setbacks, height and off - street parking are justified based on demonstrated compliance with all of the following design objectives: a. The proposed development will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of the surrounding properties for uses permitted in this zoning district. Overnight accommodations are a use permitted in the Tourist zoning district without this approval. Surrounding properties on three sides are well - established uses and not likely to be redeveloped —the City's land, to the west and north, the Palm Pavilion and motel and retail to the south. The duplexes to, the north and mixed uses to the east on Mandalay are some areas that may undergo future redevelopment. The proposed project could stimulate additional tourist - related uses in this area. b. The proposed development complies with applicable design guidelines adopted by the City. The proposed project is designed to meet the requirements of Beach by Design in scale, bulk, coverage, density and character. The architectural stepbacks are as prescribed by Beach by Design. Parking is internal to the project site to reduce noise transmission and visual distraction to adjacent properties. This project furthers the City's objective of revitalizing the beach and creating additional hotel rooms. We provide the following information concerning the design, scale and mass criteria: Beach by Design VII C Design Scale and Mass of Buildings rA 10 0 The quantifiable aspects of the architectural vocabulary are as follows per Beach by Design: 9 Buildings with a footprint of greater than 5,000 square feet ... will be constructed so that no more than two of the three building dimensions in the vertical or horizontal planes are equal in length. The building dimensions vary considerably so that no more than two of the three building dimensions in the vertical or horizontal planes are equal in length. The building height is approximately 81 feet above finished grade. Please refer to Exhibit C for the various building dimensions. • No plane (or elevation) of the project "...continue (s) uninterrupted for greater than one hundred (100'). Each building facade that exceeds 100' incorporates a vertical recess, each of which is at least five feet deep; the widths vary. • At least sixty percent (6091o) of any elevation will be covered with windows or architectural decoration. All of the elevations are provided with large windows or architectural decoration, including columns, arches, and particularly on the lowest three levels various and frequent openings and penetrations of the perimeter planes. The percentage of decoration on each of the exterior elevations are as follows, all exceeding the minimum requirement of 60 %: O The height and mass of buildings will be correlated to: (1) the dimensional aspects of the parcel proposed for development and (2) adjacent public spaces such as streets and parks. • North elevation - 73% O East elevation - 62% ® South elevation - 66% LU West elevation - 71% C= s 1 No more than sixty percent (7591o) of the theoretical maximum building envelope located above 45 feet will be occupied by a building. �yU lm 1�i , � � ,,'The proposed building envelope above 45 feet equals 556,620 CF; the theoretical maximum building envelope above 45 feet equals 742,163 CF. U Thus, the overall building envelope above 45 feet is 75% of the theoretical maximum allowed building envelope. O The height and mass of buildings will be correlated to: (1) the dimensional aspects of the parcel proposed for development and (2) adjacent public spaces such as streets and parks. 0 0 While the height and mass of the building are as described above, the apparent scale is correlated to the parcel and adjacent public spaces by means of applying several design devices, including but not limited to.. 1) conforming and maximizing the shape of the building to the shape of the site in order to suggest "urban infill "; 2) identifying changes of floor level; 3) arraying and repeating "human scaled" items, such as discreet windows; 4) dividing the fagade, for both scalar and decorative purposes, into two colors borrowed from Beach by Design, and; 5) varying the application of texture and opacity. s • The guideline for mixed use is not applicable. c. The design, scale and intensity of the proposed development supports the established or emerging character of an area; The architectural style and compliance with design guidelines will support the emerging character of the area as envisioned by Beach by Design. d. In order to form a cohesive, visually interesting and attractive appearance, the proposed development incorporates a substantial number of the following design elements: • Changes in horizontal building planes; • Use of architectural details such as columns, cornices, stringcourses, pilasters, porticos, balconies, railings, awnings, etc; • Variety in materials, colors and textures; • Distinctive fenestration patterns; • Building stepbacks; and �..,. • Distinctive roofs forms. C" Many of these elements have been incorporated into the design as discussed in detail in response to Criteria 6.b. above. As shown on the �; & < color elevations and perspective rendering, a variety of colors and L" �y materials, including stucco, copper, aluminum and glass are used. 32 2.- Z 9. The proposed development provides for appropriate buffers, enhanced landscape design and appropriate distances between Q buildings. 0 0 0 Landscaping The landscape plan is in accordance with design guidelines set forth in Beach by Design with special emphasis on selecting plant material that is native and salt - tolerant but provides visual interest. Two sides of the project are building facades fronting on public- rights -of -way. Landscaping will include native palms and lush shrubbery as more specifically noted on the accompanying Comprehensive Landscape Program application. Granting of Hotel Density Reserve Units In connection with the Applicant's request for hotel density reserve units, the following indicate how the Applicant meets Beach by Design requirements for such additional units. 1. Those properties and/or developments that have acquired density from the Destination Resort Density Pool are not eligible to have rooms allocated from the Reserve. The subject property does not qualify for units from the Destination Resort Density Pool. 2. Those properties and /or developments that have had density transferred off to another _property and /or development(s) through. an approved Transfer of Development Rights (TDR) application by the City after December 31, 2007, are not eligible to have rooms allocated from the Reserve. There has been no transfer of density off of the subject property. ; fx 3. A maximum of 100 hotel rooms may be allocated from the Reserve to any development with a lot size of less than 2.5 acres. Those developments o with a lot size greater than or equal to 2.5 acres may use the Reserve to M achieve a density of 88 hotel rooms per acre. However, in no instance shall 00 0 rm the density of a parcel of land exceed 150 units per acre regardless of whether it has received benefit of transfers of development rights in Z addition to the Reserve, or not. 2 ®_ The subject property contains 0.6 acre, making it eligible to receive up to 100 hotel rooms. The amount requested is 58 rooms. The proposed 88 -room project will have a density of 150 rooms per acre but shall not exceed that amount. 10 0 ' 0 4. Accessory uses inconsistent with amenities typical of a mid - priced hotel shall require compliance with the base FAR requirements of the Resort Facilities High (RFH) Future Land Use category. . There are no such accessory uses proposed. The proposed amenities will be an internal restaurant /bar and a small meeting room, adequate to serve the hotel guests. 5. No hotel room allocated from the Reserve may be converted to a residential use (i.e. attached dwelling). Acknowledged. 6. The maximum building heights of the various character districts cannot be increased to accommodate hotel rooms allocated from the Reserve. No height increase is proposed. 7. A legally enforceable mandatory evacuation /closure covenant that the overnight accommodation use will be closed as soon as practicable after a hurricane watch that includes Clearwater Beach is posted by the National Hurricane Center. Acknowledged. Such covenant is included in the associated proposed Development Agreement. S. Access to overnight accommodation units must be provided through a lobby-and internal corridors. This requirement is met as shown on proposed architectural plans. 9. All hotel rooms obtained from the Reserve that are not constructed shall be returned to the Reserve. w- ujAcknowledged. Such covenant is included in the associated proposed � Development Agreement. a_ 9jThe development shall comply with the MPO's countywide approach to the gib c� Oapplication of concurrency management for transportation facilities, and �_ ®the transportation analysis conducted for the development shall include (criteria stated in Ordinance 7925 -08]. This application includes a traffic assessment. 11.A reservation system shall be required as an integral part of the hotel use and there shall be a lobby /front desk area that must be operated as a typical lobby /front desk area for a hotel would be operated. 11 Acknowledged. 12. The books and records pertaining to use of each hotel room shall be open for inspection by authorized representatives of the City, upon reasonable notice, in order to confirm compliance with these regulations as allowed by general law. Acknowledged. 5/27/2009 10:52 AM 50146.116759 #469571 v1 - Lele /Ex to Comp Infill Px Q _Vpwr�g 12 d a v i d I. w a I I a c e & a s IRIGIN. RECEIVED m CITY ( i i iates, p. o./ mpa bay ( 7 2 7 736 6 0 0 0 ) �0r EXHI5IT -G Northwest Corner Ambiance Dotal architects •DO; • 0 � • NorthSfde Civil Land Planning Due Diligence Reports Re- Zoning, Land Use, Annexation 4�4 r✓vwq� .5mv lac. Stormwater Management Utility Design Traffic. Construction Administration May 11, 2009 Mr. Scott Kurleman OR11 City of Clearwater 100 S. Myrtle Avenue R' yt; �[� � Clearwater, FL 33756 Y 1. _i 2009 RANNG D�`1T RE: Ambiance on White Sand � Y " ' LEARWATER 20 Kendall Street FLD2008 -12034 Dear Sir /Madam: Below are responses to comments made by staff: ENGINEERING — Steve Doherty Prior to the issuance of a Building Permit: Revise sheet C4.1 to indicate separate taps on the water main for potable water and supply water for the fire suppression system. Separate taps are indicated for potable water & fire. See Sheet C4.1. 2. Replace City of Clearwater Contract Specifications and Standards Index #404, pg. 1/1 (Blow off Detail) with current index (02/09 revision). Detail has been replaced. 3. Replace City of Clearwater Contract Specifications and Standards index #109 pg. 1/3 (Typical Sidewalk Construction and Ramp Detail) with current index (01 /09 revision). Detail has been replaced. 4. Replace City of Clearwater Contract Specifications and Standards Index #304, pg. 1/1 with current index #304, pg. '/z depicting a double -sweep cleanout (03/04 revision). Detail has been replaced. 5. Notes imply that reclaimed water will be used on this site. If so, indicate how this connection will be made on the utility plan. Connection to be made prior to building permit after irrigation plan is designed. 300 South Belcher Road Clearwater, Florida 33765 tech @northsideengineering.com 727 443 2869 Fax 727 446 8036 Mr. Scott Kurleman Ambianace May 11, 2009 Page Two Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy: OR IGIM RECEIVED PiAff 15 2009 NNINO , . T CLEARWAT Engineering Department agrees that the installation of sidewalk along Kendall Street frontage is impractical given limited right -of -way width. Applicant will be required instead to make a payment in lieu of sidewalk installation based upon most recent City of Annual Sidewalk Contract cost per square foot. Contact Steve Doherty for specific information (727) 562- 4750). Acknowledged. 2. Applicant shall submit 5 sets of as -built drawings that are signed and sealed by a State of Florida Registered Professional Engineer. The Construction Services Inspector will field inspect as -built drawings for accuracy. As- builts to be submitted prior to C.O. General Notes: 1. Reclaimed water is available to this site for non - potable water usage. Acknowledged. 2. General Note: DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Application. Acknowledged. ENVIRONMENTAL — Sarah Josuns Please note: An Asbestos Survey is usually required prior to conducting any demolition or renovations. Please contact Pinellas County Air Quality (464 -4422) for further information. Note is shown on civil plans on Sheet C2.1. PARKS & RECREATION — Debbie Reid 4/16/09 — The site data table needs to be corrected to reflect the number of proposed overnight accommodations and number of proposed fractional share unites. These specific numbers are 2/23/09 — The site data table needs to reflect the number of proposed overnight accommodations and number of fractional share units. Specific numbers of each type of unit is needed in order to calculate impact fees. (The number of previous units has been addressed.) 74 overnight accommodations and 14 fractional units are reflected on CI.1 • Mr. Scott Kurleman Ambianace May 11, 2009 Page Three :J RIC C a' - u, 9NI I)1 IV CL;,ARWATV*1- 12/18/08 — The site data table needs to be corrected to reflect the number of previous residential units and numbers of previous hotel /motel units, as well as number of proposed overnight accommodations and number of fractional share units. See revised site data table on C1.I Open space /recreation impact fees are due prior to issuance of building permits or final plat (if applicable) whichever occurs first. These fees could be substantial and it is recommended that you contact Debbie Reid at 727 -562 -4818 to calculate the assessment. Acknowledged 12/18/08 — The Public Art and Design Impact Fee is due and payable on this project prior to the issuance of building permit. This fee could be substantial and it is recommended that you contact Chris Hubbard at 727 -562 -4837 to calculate the assessment. Acknowledged TRAFFIC ENGINEERING — Bennett Elbo 04/14/09 — The FLD application indicates that all parking shall be 100% valet. Show on the site plan the vehicle staging area and the maximum number of vehicles that can be staged given the dimension of each vehicle is 18 feet in length with a 2 feet gap between vehicles. See C3.1— Staking plan for staging. The above to be addressed prior to a Community Development Board (CDB) hearing. General Note(s): 1. Applicant shall comply with the current Transportation Impact Fee Ordinance and fee schedule and paid prior to a Certificate of Occupancy (C.O.). Acknowledged 2. DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. Acknowledged ZONING — Scott Kurleman 04/28/09: Prior to CDB. Provide color scaled building elevations of all sides. Both 24 "X36" and 8.5 "X11 size copies. Per telephone message left with Scott Kurleman on 0112109, 8 %x11 rendered elevations are included. 24x36 colored elevations will be submitted as soon as they are returned from the printer. 0 0 Mr. Scott Kurleman Ambianace May 11, 2009 Page Four NNIKI D WMAVAKIT CKYOY CLEARWAR-1; Prior to CDB. Explain how the loading zone functions. This was explained verbally at the DRC meeting. A gate has been added to allow passage from the parking area to the loading area. See sheet AI00. Prior to CDB revise. Stepback is measured incorrectly. Why do the drawings depict a measurement from the 10 foot setback line? It is measured from the building edge. Setbacks /Stepbacks have been relocated to their correct positions. See sheets A400 and A401. Prior to CDB. Provide heigl(t dimensions from base flood elevat on to the top of the elevator shaft and the top of�roof structure. See sheets A400 through A47; Prior to CDB. Revise landscape plan to show the ingress /egress area on the north facade. See revised landscape plan. Prior to CDB. Revise palm tree specifications to at least 10 feet of CT. The west side needs to be augmented with larger plant material (height) and quantities. Pygmy Date Palms at 6 foot overall height will look dwarf against an 85 foot tall building. Revise White Indian Hawthorne specification to 24 inch spread. See revised landscape plan and specifications. 05/04/09: Prior to CDB. Revise Exhibit B, description of request "f' to zero feet to pavement. Exhibit B has been revised to show "0" setback to pavement. Prior to CDB revise. Two 800 sq ft fractional share units are not labeled as such on Floors 6 & 7. Appropriate notations have been added on sheetA100. Prior to CDB. Indicate on the large scale building elevations the proposed exterior material and colors. Materials call -outs have been added on sheets A400 through A403. Prior to CDB. Dimension all projections from the building (awnings, balconies, etc.) on the large scale elevations. Projections have been dimensioned on sheets A400 through A403. Condition of Approval to be included in any approval by the CDB: That, prior to issuance of any permits, a Declaration of Unity of Title be recorded in the public records. Acknowledged. Mr. Scott Kurleman Ambianace ' >`d (-JR May 11, 2009I,� Page Five t CLEAR WAR. Condition of Approval to be included in any approval by the CDB: That all meter, electric boxes, communication boxes, etc be painted the same color as the building prior to Certificate of Occupancy. Acknowledged. Prior to CDB. Provide written responses to the Flexibility Criteria in CDC Section 2 -803. These responses have been made on Exhibit `B'; Page S. If you have any further questions, please feel free to contact me at the office on 727 - 443 -2869. Sincerely, Doreen A. Williams Project Director 0 0 RESPONSES TO 315/09 DRC COMMENTS FLD2008 -12034 — 20 Kendall Street GENERAL ENGINEERING: ORIGINAL PLANII,w CITY OFCLLARWATPR Please acknowledge the following prior to review by the Community Development Board: General Note 1: If the proposed project necessitates infrastructure modifications to satisfy site - specific water capacity and pressure requirements and /or wastewater capacity requirements, the modifications shall be completed by the applicant and at their expense. If underground water mains and hydrants are to be installed, the installation shall be completed and in service prior to construction in accordance with Fire Department requirements. Response No. 1: Note has been added to Utility plan Sheet C4.1 General Note 2: DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. Response No. 2: Acknowledged. Prior to the issuance of a Building Permit: Comment No. 1: Provide a separate tap off City water main for domestic water supply Response No. 1: Acknowledged. ENVIRONMENTAL: Comment No. 1: Prior to issuance of building permit: No light within 300 feet shall be visible or extend in areas identified as Sea Turtle Nesting Areas during the nesting season of May 1 to October 31. Those areas where security and public safety requires lighting, alternative light management approaches shall be applied. Demonstrate compliance on plans acceptable to the Environmental Division, prior to the issuance of building permits. Response No. 1: Acknowledged. Note has been added to plan Sheet 4.1. • Please note: An Asbestos Survey is usually required prior to conducting any demolition or renovations. Please contact Pinellas County Air Quality (464 -4422) for further information. FIRE: HARBOR MASTER: LEGAL: LAND RESOURCES: No issues. No issues. No issues. No issues. PARKS AND RECREATION: ORIGINAL RFIVED PLAN rp D WMT M&NT CtiY OF CLEARWAIM Comment No. 1: The Public Art and Design Impact Fee is due and payable on this project prior to issuance of a building permit. This fee could be substantial and it is recommended that you contact Chris Hubbard at 727- 562 -4837 to calculate the assessment. Response No. 1: Acknowledged. Comment No. 2: The site data table needs to reflect the number of proposed overnight accommodations and number of fractional share units. (The number of previous units has been addressed.) Response No. 2: See Revised Sheet C.1.1. Comment No. 3: Open space /recreation impact fees are due prior to the issuance of building permits or final plat (if applicable) whichever occurs first. These fees could be substantial and it is recommended that you contact Debbie Reid at 727- 562 -4818 to calculate the assessment. Response No. 3: Acknowledged. 2 • ORIGINAL 12Fr'r-F \A D STORMWATER: PLAW;uNw, The following shall be addressed prior to review by the Comm uniViy 67eWAAFR -" Board: Comment No. 1: 6" of freeboard shall be provided from top of weir to the bottom of the vault cover, not to the top of vault cover. Response No. 1: The cover elevation of the 8" top slab of the vault is 6.5. The elevation of the bottom of the vault cover is 5.8. The DHW elevation is 5.3, therefore 6" of freeboard has been provided. Comment No. 2: How can proposed vault be maintained if there are not maintenance ports? Show location of the maintenance ports on the drainage and utility plan. Response No. 2: Maintenance door has been added on the east side of the vault which provides access to the entire vault for maintenance. The following shall be addressed prior to issuance of Building Permit: Comment No. 1: Please show the calculations of the volume provided by the vault. Response No. 1: Calculations to be provided prior to Building permit submittal. Comment No. 2: Information on the Retention Vault detail does not match Sheet C-4.1. Note: Cross section of proposed vault shall show the top of vault elevation and the thickness of the cover. Response No. 2: Vault detail to be revised at submittal of building permit. Comment No. 3: Grading Plan, C4.1 shows proposed outfall pipe is 18" RCP, but the retention vault section view on Sheet C5.1 shows 15" RCP. Design high water level is also inconsistent Response No. 3: Corrections to be made prior to submittal of building permit. Comment No. 4: Show on the Grading plan the roof collection system routing roof runoff to the proposed vault, and provide the drainage calculations demonstrating that the size of this system can handle the 25 -year storm event. A plumbing plan for collection of stormwater runoff from the roof will be required as part of the building permit process. 3 Comment No. 7: Provide a detail of the proposed manhole and underdrain system. Submitted underdrain detail does not specify the type of drain material. Note: private stormwater manhole cover shall not read "City of Clearwater ". Response No. 7: Plan to be revised at building permit submittal. Comment No. 8: Provide a detail of the skimmer. Clearance between vault bottom and skimmer bottom is minimum 6 ". Response No. 8: Plan to be revised at building permit submittal. Comment No. 9: What are the dimensions of the control structure? Response No. 9: Plan to be revised at building permit submittal. Comment No. 10: Revise cross sections A -A and B -B to show dimension of the retention vault cover. In addition, please provide a north to south cross section of the vault. Response No. 10: Plan to be revised at building permit submittal. Comment No. 11: Show in detail the side view with invert elevations of the two 18 "x18" openings on the vault. It appears that the openings are located at the proposed building support columns. In addition, please provide grates for the openings to trap debris from flowing into the vault. Response No. 11: Plan to be revised at building permit submittal. Comment No. 12: An east to west swale between the new building and the existing building shall be provided. Provide a cross section for the proposed swales showing they meet 4:1 slope requirement. 4 r,y nw. � • ° x r 9 CFRI fear CL �. . Response No. 4: To be provided prior to building permit submittal. Architect has not completed construction documents at this time. Comment No. 5: Show on the Grading plan the survey datum that is used in the design. Response No. 5: Survey datum is shown on C4.1 grading plan. Comment No. 6: Provide a copy of the approved SWFWMD ERP permit. Response No. 6: Modification to the SWFMD permit pending. Comment No. 7: Provide a detail of the proposed manhole and underdrain system. Submitted underdrain detail does not specify the type of drain material. Note: private stormwater manhole cover shall not read "City of Clearwater ". Response No. 7: Plan to be revised at building permit submittal. Comment No. 8: Provide a detail of the skimmer. Clearance between vault bottom and skimmer bottom is minimum 6 ". Response No. 8: Plan to be revised at building permit submittal. Comment No. 9: What are the dimensions of the control structure? Response No. 9: Plan to be revised at building permit submittal. Comment No. 10: Revise cross sections A -A and B -B to show dimension of the retention vault cover. In addition, please provide a north to south cross section of the vault. Response No. 10: Plan to be revised at building permit submittal. Comment No. 11: Show in detail the side view with invert elevations of the two 18 "x18" openings on the vault. It appears that the openings are located at the proposed building support columns. In addition, please provide grates for the openings to trap debris from flowing into the vault. Response No. 11: Plan to be revised at building permit submittal. Comment No. 12: An east to west swale between the new building and the existing building shall be provided. Provide a cross section for the proposed swales showing they meet 4:1 slope requirement. 4 Response No. 12: Plan to be revised at building permit submittal. Comment No. 13: Please provide the operational maintenance plan for the proposed stormwater facility. This shall be signed and accepted by the project owner(s). Response No. 13: Operations and maintenance manual to be submitted with building permit set. Comment No. 14: Revised drainage report reflecting all the required changes shall be submitted. Response No. 14: Acknowledged. Revised drainage report to be submitted with building permit set. General Note 1: DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of s a Building Permit Application. Response 1: Acknowledged. General Note 2: At building permit application, applicant shall submit drainage report, soil report, and any other drainage related document for review and record. Response 2: Acknowledged. SOLID WASTE: � mment No. 1: As shown enclosure is under building. This Dumpster will have to be rolled out to a staging area on day(s) of collection, no larger then a 4yd Dumpster. 320 (j&)sponse No. 1: Plan has been revised to show dimension of dumpster, ® w dumpster enclosure and accessibility. F99AFFIC ENGINEERING: Comment No. 1: Provide three additional accessible parking spaces to comply with the City of Clearwater Community Development Code Sec. 3 -1409 A. Response No. 1: Parking will be 100 percent valet. The required accessible parking space at the passenger loading /unloading zone is provided. The above to be addressed prior to a Community Development Board (CDB) hearing. 5 General Note 1: Applicant shall comply with the current Transportation Impact Fee Ordinance and fee schedule and paid prior to a Certificate of Occupancy (C.O.). Response No. 1: Acknowledged. General Note 2: DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. Response No. 2: PLANNING: Acknowledged. Comment No. 1: Per CDC Section 3- 908.D. balconies that linearly extend 50 percent or less of the width of the building wall to which they are attached shall be permitted to extend into a required setback area not more than 24 inches. As proposed the balconies extend 6.5 feet into the stepback and exceed the 50% limitation. Response No. 1: Project has been substantially redesigned, including balconies that project no farther than 24" into setbacks or stepbacks. Please refer to building elevations. Comment No. 2: Exhibit B Comp Infill 4. How will the adjoining properties not suffer substantial detriment as a result of this size of development? 2/27/09 Specifically, the properties to the immediate east and south adjacent to the five foot setback. Response No. 2: Please see revised Exhibit "B." Comment No. 3: Application is insufficient. See notes. Resp& No. 3: Acknowledged. The application is resubmitted for the May 7 DRC meeting. o. 4: Exhibit B.D.1 Describe how this proposed development of land is in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density ,a and character of the properties to the immediate east and south. Describe as you are trying to "sell" .this project to the CDB. Response No. 4: Please see revised Exhibit "B." Comment No. 5: VII.C.1. Provide an exhibit showing that no more than two of the three building dimensions in the vertical or horizontal 1.1 • • planes are equal in length. The two shorter lengths must vary by 40% or more. Show for each elevation. Response No. 5: See attached Exhibit "C" Observe that, of the three building dimensions (L =190', W= 154 ", H =85 "), only two are equal, that is, they vary by less than 40% of the smaller. Thus, project complies with VII.C.1. Comment No. 6: Beach by Design "Old Florida" A.3.4 . Show dimensions and data on elevations. A.3.c. this property fronts on two rights -of- ways, building step -back must be met on both building fronts. The minimum stepback must be 15 feet at 35 feet in height. It may not gradually stepback to 15 feet. The first submittal depicted the correct stepback criteria but only showed the stepback on one front. Response No. 6: Project has been substantially redesigned so as to comply with staff interpretation that the required 2:1 ratio for setbacks and stepbacks shall be arithmetically calculated (averaged). Please refer to building elevations. Comment No. 7: VII.C.3. Show how the elevations are covered with windows or architectural decoration to achieve the 60% coverage. List what is included in the architectural decoration. Response No. 7: Please refer to building elevations and Exhibit "D." Comment No. 8: Exhibit B. Comp Infill 1. How is the development impractical without deviations? 2/27/09 You discuss the project can not be completed without deviations, why not, what happens? I need to defend this in a staff report. 7 Cn 7 Response No. 8: See revised Exhibit "B." Without the requested 5' of relief to the setbacks and stepbacks, the resulting buildable width for that portion of the building parallel to Avalon and Kendall Streets will be too narrow to allow hotel rooms on both sides of the corridor; nor will it allow parking on both sides of the drive aisle. For that portion of the building perpendicular to Avalon and Kendall Streets, the resulting buildable width will be too narrow to allow parking on both sides of the drive aisle plus the vehicle ramp. Assuming that a hotel project at this location is economically viable without the setback and stepback relief, which is highly unlikely, our best -case estimate is that the unit yield would be reduced to not more than 45 hotel rooms and 9 suites, while parking count would shrink to 56 spaces. Comment No. 9: The proposed development does not meet the Design Scale & Mass of buildings C.2. (uninterrupted plane) of Beach by Design. There must be an offset (interruption) of at least 5 feet for every building plane greater than 100 feet in length. Response No. 9: Project has been substantially redesigned such that the maximum dimension of uninterrupted building planes does not exceed 100 feet. Please refer to building elevations and schematic floor plans. Comment No. 10: A request has been made for a reduced setback and stepback. Each should result in an improved site plan, landscaping areas in excess of the minimum required and /or improved design and appearance. Explain in detail how this has been achieved for both the setback and stepback reduction. Response No. 10: Based on the estimate of unit and parking yield referenced in Response No. 8, the project is not viable without the requested relief; without a project, there is no entity upon which to improve the design. However, we believe that, because of the location — and consequent price - of this and similar sites, most development efforts will find it necessary to approach the maximum allowable building volume with their proposed designs. Therefore, if we were asked to design this project, regardless of the economics, within the unrelieved setbacks and f stepbacks, we would — now that we have done it for the third time - begin by simply moving each side of the currently 0 proposed design toward the center of the site as necessary, and cs C'J make appropriate reconciliations at the new intersections. This is not to say that superior design is not to be exchanged for requested relief, rather, it says that we have optimized the many and various compromises that must always be made when 0 � r developing in the public environment, and that we would apply the same superior design decisions to a similar project of reduced volume. Comment No. 11: Exhibit B Comp Infill 6.c. Explain in detail how this architectural style and design support the established or emerging character. Response No. 11: See revised Exhibit "B." Comment No. 12: Exhibit B Comp Infill 6.e. Explain in detail how the five foot distance between the proposed project and the existing properties to the immediate east and south is appropriate. Response No. 12: See revised Exhibit "B." Comment No. 13: The proposed building design and architecture has not met Beach By Design VII. Design 1 objective "to ensure aesthetically pleasing architecture in a tropical vernacular ". Suggest a more traditional look versus the contemporary look to gain staff support. Building must be revised to meet stepback and uninterrupted building plane requirements. Response No. 13: As a result of meetings with several members of city staff, including the Director of Planning, the exterior image of the project has been substantially redesigned so as to offer more traditional, Mediterranean - inspired stylistic elements. At the same time, it incorporates some less traditional elements, such as aluminum- and -glass storefront, that are typical not only to commercial projects in general, but also, to existing buildings in this district, as well. Please refer to building elevations and color rendering. OTHER: No Comments 4/9/2009 9:18 AM 050146.116759 #485420 v1 - Ambiance /Second Round Responses to DRC F-� E' \g y E 0 0 W LL U . }� rwater December 08, 2008 Ed Armstrong Po Box 1368 Clearwater, F133757 -1368 40 CITY OF CLEORWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE: (727) 562 -4567 FAX: (727) 562 -4576 W W W.MYCLEARWATER. COM VIA FAX: 727 - 462 -0365 RE: FLD2008 -12034 -- 20 KENDALL ST -- Letter of Completeness Dear Ed Armstrong : The Planning Staff has entered your application into the Department's filing system and assigned the case number: FLD2008- 12034. After a preliminary review of the submitted documents, staff has determined that the application is complete. The Development Review Committee (DRC) will review the application for sufficiency on January 08, 2009, in the Planning Department conference room - Room 216 - on the second floor of the Municipal Services Building. The building is located at 100 South Myrtle Avenue in downtown Clearwater. You will be contacted by the Planning Department's Administrative Analyst within one week prior to the meeting date for the approximate time that your case will be reviewed. You or your representative (as applicable) must be present to answer any questions that the DRC may have regarding your application. Additional comments may be generated by the DRC at the time of the meeting. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at 562 -4553 or Scott.Kurleman@myclearwater.com. Sincerely yours, Scott Kurleman Planner III Letter of Completeness - FLD2008- 12034 - 20 KENDALL ST °Clearwater 0 December 03, 2008 Ed Armstrong Po Box 1368 Clearwater, F133757 -1368 CITY OF CLEVERWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE: (727) 562 -4567 FAX: (727) 562 -4576 WWW.MYCLEARWATER.COM VIA FAX: 727- 462 -0365 RE: FLD2008 -12034 -- 20 KENDALL ST -- Letter of Incompleteness Dear Ed Armstrong : The Planning Staff has entered your application into the Department's filing system and assigned the case number: FLD2008- 12034. After a preliminary review of the submitted documents, staff has determined that the application is Incomplete with the following comments. 1. Dimension elevations as required in Section I. 2. Provide a traffic impact study per ordinance 7925 -08. (Gulf Coast Consulting may already be performing this). 3. Provide the F.A.R. on the site data table. Section-4-202 of the Community Development Code states that if an application is deemed incomplete, the deficiencies of the application shall be specified by Staff. No further development review action shall be taken until the deficiencies are corrected and the application is deemed complete. Please resubmit by Monday, December 8, 2008 at NOON. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at 562 -4553 or Scott.Kurleman@myclearwater.com. Sincerely yours, Scott Kurleman Planner III Letter of Incompleteness - FLD2008 -12034 - 20 KENDALL ST I` Traffic Assessment For Ambiance on White Sands The proposed 90 room hotel will contain an internal restaurant / bar but will not have conference or banquet facilities. Based on ITE Trip Generation, 8t' Edition rates the hotel development would generate 735 daily trips of which 28 would occur during the AM peck hour and 38 would occur during the PM peak hour (16 entering / 22 exiting). Typically the City of Clearwater does not require a detailed traffic analysis if the trip generation is less than 1000 daily trips and 100 peak hour trips. The adjacent segment of Mandalay Avenue (north of Baymont Street), is a two lane collector roadway and per FDOT Generalized Tables has a LOS D capacity of 1390 vehicles per hour. This segment of Mandalay Avenue is not recognized as a regulated roadway in the MPO 2008 Level of Service Report. The project generated traffic represents 2.73% of the peak hour LOS D capacity, and the impacts are minimal. €. 7J , 0 AVALON ST KENDALL ST . ROCKAWAY ST y, d AMBLER ST PROJECT LOCATION BAY ESPLANADE BAYMONT ST H H W 0 a L� W ^O F`Y N PROJECT LOCATION — Ambiance on White Sands PROJECT 08 -072 2 Gulf Coast Consulting, Inc. DATE: FIGURE: � �2oos Land Development Consulting DRAWN BY: G.J.S. L A I '00 1� PROJECT LOCATION — Ambiance on White Sands PROJECT 08 -072 2 Gulf Coast Consulting, Inc. DATE: FIGURE: � �2oos Land Development Consulting DRAWN BY: G.J.S. Hotel (310) Average Vehicle Trip Ends vs: Rooms On a: Weekday Number of Studies: 10 Average Number of Rooms: 476 Directional Distribution: 50% entering, 50% exiting Trip Generation per Room Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation 8.17 3.47 - 9.58 3.38 Data Plot and Equation Trip Generation, 8th Edition 580 Institute of Transportation Engineers - 18,000 X 17,000 ---- '--- -- ---- - ----- - - -- 16,000 - - - ,.... , ......... : - . 15,000 - ---: --- =--- ------• -- ; - - - -; --- ,-- - -• --- 14,000 ............ -- •- --- -- - - --. -. - -- . . , 13,000 --------- --------- --- - - - -- •---- •- -- - --- Cn c - W 12,000 , - . ... - - . - - °— 11,000 ----- ----- -- -- - - -, - -- - a) 10,000 - - - ;- -- --- --- •-- --. ................ - - - - ,- - - -; = -- > 9,000 -- _ _ _I ... _' _ _ .. . _ _. . _ _ _. . _ _ _ _ _ _. ,_ _ _ _; .. ..; _ _ _ _ _ - - - =__ F� ;_ i at 8,000 - -- ---- ; > 7,000 - - - -, - - ; - - - ,- II j 4 �- m i- 6,000 :...... - - - ' 5,000 = --=- ----- - ----- - 4,000 - - -. - - -- -- . -- . - - -, -- 3,000 . , X, 2,000 ; -- -- - -- - - - - - - -- -- -- -- -- -, - - -- -- . - --- -, - - -, 1,000 X ---- ------ --- :--- -;-- -- - -- ------ 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 1900 X = Number of Rooms X Actual Data Points Fitted Curve - - - - -- Average Rate Fitted Curve Equation: T = 8.95(X) - 373.16 R2 = 0.98 Trip Generation, 8th Edition 580 Institute of Transportation Engineers • Resort Hotel (330) • Average Vehicle Trip Ends vs: Rooms On a: Weekday, Peak Flour of Adjacent Street Traffic, One Flour Between 7 and 9 a.m. Number of Studies: 7 Average Number of Rooms: 504 Directional Distribution: 72% entering, 28% exiting Trip Generation per Room Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation 0.31 0.24 - 0.41 0.57 ®ata Plot and Equation 400 300 c W Q H U_ S 200 N N Q 100 0 300 400 500 600 X = Number of Rooms X Actual Data Points Fitted Curve Fitted Curve Equation: T = 0.40(X) - 40.79 700 800 900 - - - - -- Average Rate R2 = 0.75 Trip Generation, 8th Edition 654 Institute of Transportation Engineers C= C= C1J MMIN11 I r�'i r Data Plot and Equation 500 400 ----- ----- '-- -- ----- - x U) LU CL 300 - --------- --------- -------------------------------------- --- - --- -X-------------- ID a) 200 - --------- --------- -------- ....... x .............. ----------- -------- x :x X 100 - --------- --------- --------- ....... -------- --------- ......... X 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 X = Number of Rooms X Actual Data Points . — Fitted Curve - - - - -- Average Rate Fitted Curve Equation: Ln(T) = 1.44 Ln(X) - 3.62 R2 = 0.93 Trip Generation, 8th Edition 655 Institute of Transportation Engineers Resort Hotel (330) Average Vehicle Trip Ends vs: Rooms On a: Weekday, Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic, One Hour Between 4 and 6 p.m. Number of Studies: 10 Average Number of Rooms: 495 Directional Distribution: 43% entering, 57% exiting Trip Generation per Room Data Plot and Equation 500 400 ----- ----- '-- -- ----- - x U) LU CL 300 - --------- --------- -------------------------------------- --- - --- -X-------------- ID a) 200 - --------- --------- -------- ....... x .............. ----------- -------- x :x X 100 - --------- --------- --------- ....... -------- --------- ......... X 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 X = Number of Rooms X Actual Data Points . — Fitted Curve - - - - -- Average Rate Fitted Curve Equation: Ln(T) = 1.44 Ln(X) - 3.62 R2 = 0.93 Trip Generation, 8th Edition 655 Institute of Transportation Engineers J - ,o r , 0 0 TABLE 4 -4 GENERALIZED PEAK HOUR TWO -WAY VOLUMES FOR FLORIDA'S UNINTERRUPTED FLOW HIGHWAYS Class 11(2.00 to 4.50 signalized intersections per mile) URBANIZED AREAS* Paved Shoulder Level of Service Lanes Divided A B C D 2 Undivided 210 730 1,450 2,060 4 Divided 1,940 3,140 4,540 5,870 6 Divided 2,900_ 4,700 6,800 .8,810 STATE TWO -WAY ARTERIALS Class I ( >0.00 to 1.99 signalized intersections per mile) Lanes A Level of Service Lanes Divided A B C D 2 Undivided ** 400 1,310 1,560 4 Divided 460 2,780 3,300 3,390 6 Divided 700 4,240 4,950 5,080 8 Divided 890 5,510 6,280 6,440 Class 11(2.00 to 4.50 signalized intersections per mile) URBANIZED AREAS* E 1,610 * ** * ** Paved Shoulder Level of Service Lanes FREEWAYS B C Interchange spacing? 2 mi. apart 2 Undivided ** 180 E 1,460 1,550 Level of Service 2,470 2,620 Lanes A B C D 6,670 4 2,310 3,840 5,350 6,510 10 010 6 8 3,580 4,840 5,930 8,020 8,270 11,180 10,050 13,600 Major City /County Roadways (Buses per hour) 10 6,110 10,110 14,110 17,160 Sidewalk Coverage A B C D E 12 7,360 12,200 17,020 20,710 E 1,610 * ** * ** Class III (more than 4.5 signalized intersections per mile and not within primary city central business district of an urbanized area over 750,000) Interchange spacing < 2 mi. apart Paved Shoulder Level of Service Lanes Lanes Divided A B C D E 2 Undivided ** 180 1,070 1,460 1,550 4 Divided ** 390 2,470 3,110 3,270 6 Divided ** 620 3,830 4,680 4,920 8 Divided ** 800 5,060 6,060 61360 Class III (more than 4.5 signalized intersections per mile and not within primary city central business district of an urbanized area over 750,000) Interchange spacing < 2 mi. apart J. -A E�� 7,240. 11,180 15,130 19,050 23,000' l E see 7,110 11,180 15,240 19,310 23,360 C= cv BICYCLE MODE (Note: Level of service for the bicycle mode in this table is based on roadway geometrics at 40 mph posted speed and traffic conditions, not number of bicyclists using the facility.) (Multiply motorized vehicle volumes shown below by number of directional roadway lanes to determine two -way maximum service volumes.) Paved Shoulder Level of Service Lanes A B C D 4 2,050 3,350 4,840 6,250 6 3,240 5,250 7,600 9,840 8 4,420 7,160 10,360 13,420 10 5,600 9,070 13,130 16,980 12 6,780 10,980 15,890 20,560 J. -A E�� 7,240. 11,180 15,130 19,050 23,000' l E see 7,110 11,180 15,240 19,310 23,360 C= cv BICYCLE MODE (Note: Level of service for the bicycle mode in this table is based on roadway geometrics at 40 mph posted speed and traffic conditions, not number of bicyclists using the facility.) (Multiply motorized vehicle volumes shown below by number of directional roadway lanes to determine two -way maximum service volumes.) I., c f y f c U Paved Shoulder Level of Service Bicycle Lane Level of Service Lanes Divided A B C D E Coverage A B C D E 2 Undivided ** ** 500 1,200 1,470 0 -49% ** ** 310 1,310 >1,310 4 Divided ** ** 1,180 2,750 3,120 50 -84% ** 240 390 >390 * ** 6 Divided ** ** 1,850 4,240 4,690 85 -100% 300 680 >680 * ** * ** 8 Divided ** ** 2,450 5,580 6,060 PEDESTRIAN MODE Class IV (more than 4.5 signalized intersections per mile and within (Note: Level of service for the pedestrian mode in this table is based on roadway primary city central business district of an urbanized area geometrics at 40 mph posted speed and traffic conditions, not number of pedestrians over 750,000) using the facility.) (Multiply motorized vehicle volumes shown below by number Level of Service of directional roadway lanes to determine two -way maximum service volumes.) Lanes Divided A B C D E Level of Service 2 Undivided ** ** 490 1,310 1,420 Sidewalk Coverage A B C D E 4 Divided ** ** 1,170 2,880 3,010 0 -49% ** ** ** 600 1,480 6 Divided ** ** 1,810 4,350 4,520 50 -84% ** ** ** 940 1,800 8 Divided ** ** 2,460 5,690 5,910 85 -100% ** 210 1,080 >1,080 * ** BUS MODE (Scheduled Fixed Route) NON -STATE ROADWAYS Major City /County Roadways (Buses per hour) Level of Service (Note: Buses per hour shown are only for the peak hour in the single direction of higher traffic flow.) Lanes Divided A B C E Level of Service 2 Undivided ** ** 870 1,480 Sidewalk Coverage A B C D E 4 Divided ** ** 2,030 3,120 050B 0 -84% ** >5 >4 >3 >2 6 Divided *% ** 3,170 , 4,690 85 -100% >6 >4 >3 ?2 >1 ARTERIAL/NON -STATE ROADWAY ADJUSTMENTS Other Signalized Roadways (alter corresponding volume by the indicated percent) (signalized intersection analysis) Level of Service Lanes Median Left Turns Lanes Adjustment Factors Lanes Divided A B C D E 2 Divided Yes +5% 2 Undivided ** ** 450 950 1,200 2 Undivided No -20% 4 Divided * * * * 1,050 2,070 2,400 Multi Undivided Yes -5% Multi Undivided No -25% Source: Florida Department of Transportation 05/17/07 Systems Planning Office 605 Suwannee Street, MS 19 ONE -WAY FACILITIES Tallahassee, FL 32399 -0450 Multiply the corresponding two - directional volumes in this table by 0.6. http://www.dot.state.fl.us/planning/systems/sm/los/default.htin *Values shown are presented as hourly two -way volumes for levels of service and we for the automobile/truck modes unless specifically stated Although presented as peak hour two -way volumes, they actually represent peak hour peak direction conditions with an applicable D factor applied This table does not constitute a standard and should be used only for general planning applications. The computer models from which this table is derived should be used for more specific planning applications. The table and deriving computer models should not be used for corridor or intersection design, where more refined techniques exist Level of service letter grade thresholds are probably not comparable across modes and, therefore, cross modal comparisons should be made with caution. Furthermore, combining levels of service of different modes into one overall roadway level of service is not recommended Calculations are based on planning applications of the Highway Capacity Manual, Bicycle LOS Model, Pedestrian LOS Model and Transit Capacity and Quality of Service Manual, respectively for the automobile/truck, bicycle, pedestrian and bus modes. _ .. * *Cannot be achieved using table input value defaults. ** *Not applicable for that level of service letter grade. For automobilehruck modes, volumes greater than level of service D become F because intersection capacities have been reached For bicycle and I., c f y f c U 0 E TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY FOR AMBIANCE ON WHITE SANDS 20 KENDALL STREET . CLEARWATER BEACH, FLORIDA PREPARED FOR: PANORAMA, LLC PREPARED BY: GULF COAST CONSULTING, INC. DECEMBER 2008 PROJECT # 08 -072 ��a r , • L , e • I. INTRODUCTION The applicant is proposing to redevelop their property on Clearwater Beach into a 90 room resort hotel. (See Figure 1) The redevelopment of the property is the subject of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment in Tourist "T" zoning district. This application requires an assessment of the traffic impacts of development. The site is currently vacant and is located at 20 Kendall Street with frontage on Avalon Street as well. Prior to completing this analysis a methodology was established with the City of Clearwater staff. II. EXISTING TRAFFIC CONDITIONS The property has direct access to Kendall Street west of Mandalay Avenue. Mandalay Avenue is a four -lane roadway which transitions to two -lanes with on- street parking north of Bay Esplanade. As requested by the City of Clearwater traffic engineering staff PM peak period traffic counts were conducted in December 2008 at the following intersections: N. Mandalay Avenue / Bay Esplanade N. Mandalay Avenue / Kendall Street N. Mandalay Avenue / Royal Way All traffic counts were converted to annual average equivalents using FDOT seasonal adjustment factors. According to the traffic counts Mandalay Avenue carries 452 vehicles between Bay Esplanade and Kendall Street and 471 vehicles south of Royal Way. Existing traffic volumes are shown in Figure 2. Existing intersections were analyzed using the HCS+ software. The HCS+ printouts are included in Appendix A. Presently the signalized intersection at N. Mandalay Avenue / Bay Esplanade operates at LOS A with average delay being 4.1 seconds per vehicle. At the intersection at N. Mandalay Avenue / Kendall Street northbound left turns operate at LOS A and the eastbound approach (Kendall) operates at LOS B. At the intersection of N. Mandalay Avenue / Royal Way the northbound left turns operate at LOS A. and the westbound approach (Royal Way) stop - controlled movements operate at LOS B. Mandalay Avenue functions as collector roadway and according to FDOT 2002 QLOS Handbook capacity tables has a LOS D capacity of 1,390 vehicles per hour on the undivided segment. The segment between Bay Esplanade and Kendall Street presently operates at LOS C during the PM peak hour carrying 452 vehicles, and the segment between Kendall Street and Royal Way operates at LOS C carrying 471 vehicles. ORIGINAL RECEIVE® rr 10 2009 1 plA"Ng, WMAYANT Calf Of CtR14� I\ N tj 0. L Z0 zo PROJECT LOCATION — Ambiance on White Sands PROJECT NO: 08 -072 T) A TF.• 17M TRF. c 7ult uoast Uonsuiting, Inc. Land Development Consulting 11/2008 DRAWN BY: G.J.S. . y N L2 o�2M M —0 90 GLENDALE ST I L 19 ROYAL WAY o--1 I 0- 2� N 0 N Nj n} � N Q AVALON ST �1 C, N L 0 N�o d I L f -0 8 KENDALL ST JUANITA WAY 5 71 r 0— 5--- °' CD N ° �1 L� N 2 00 a0 �: — LF —2 16 BAY ESPLANADE 5 f -11 r 2 - 20 °M°NM N� M L1 M N PROJECT NO: EXISTING PM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUME (2008) 08 -072 Gulf Coast Consulting, Inc. DATE: FIGURE: Land Development Consulting 12/2008 DRAWN BY: G.J.S. Q: C-4 90 PROJECT NO: EXISTING PM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUME (2008) 08 -072 Gulf Coast Consulting, Inc. DATE: FIGURE: Land Development Consulting 12/2008 DRAWN BY: G.J.S. M. FUTURE TRAFFIC CONDITIONS Existing traffic was adjusted by a 2% annual growth rate to the expected build -out year of 2010 to account for background traffic from other nearby redevelopment projects. The site will be developed as a 90 room resort hotel. Using Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation, 8t' Edition rates, the amount of project trips was calculated and estimate is shown below: TRIP GENERATION ESTIMATES Land Use Amount Daily Trips PM Peak Trips Resort Hotel 90 Rooms 735 38(16/22) All vehicular access will be taken from Kendall Street which intersects with N. Mandalay Avenue and the expected distribution is as follows: 100% to / from the south (3 8) PROJECT IMPACT CALCULATIONS Project Road Segment Lanes Project Trips Capacity Percent Mandalay Ave. (Bay Esplanade — Site) 2LU 38 1390 2.73% Mandalay Ave. (Site — Royal Way) 2LU 0 1390 0.00% With project traffic added the signalized intersection at N. Mandalay Avenue / Bay Esplanade would operate at LOS A with average delay being 4.0 seconds per vehicle. At the intersection at N. Mandalay Avenue / Kendall Street northbound left turns would continue to operate at LOS A and the eastbound approach (Kendall) would continue to operate at LOS B. At the intersection of N. Mandalay Avenue / Royal Way the northbound left turns would operate at LOS A and the westbound approach (Royal Way) stop - controlled movements would continue to operate at LOS B. With background traffic and project traffic added the segment of N. Mandalay Avenue would carry 507 vehicles between Bay Esplanade and Kendall Street and 489 vehicles between Kendall Street and Royal Way. This represents LOS C operations which are acceptable. Future traffic volumes are shown in Figure 3, and the HCS+ printouts are included in Appendix B. ORIGIN & RECEIVED Pr1 102009 PLANNING ASM 2 CffYOF C i&4 _ LO N O O -0 KENDALL ST L 8 5� r 0— LO, U3 o N LO 27 --- I N �°I 1N I p 1+ N ROYAL WAY JUANITA WAY N Ln 2 O �— 00 N .-- L-� r 17 BAY ESPLANADE p " T 2— 0 - r Cr . 21 N ld . �j L N M PROJECT NO: FUTURE PM PEAK HOUR- TRAFFIC VOLUME (2010) 08 -072 Gulf Coast Consulting, Inc. DATE: FIGURE: Land Development Consulting 122008 1 DRAWN BY: 3 G.J.S. L2 O OT to —0 I L_._ F20 GLENDALE ST 0� r 0— LO N 2--] N N AVALON ST a $_ I TE 38 PM TRIPS M °0- (16 IN/22 OUT) _ LO N O O -0 KENDALL ST L 8 5� r 0— LO, U3 o N LO 27 --- I N �°I 1N I p 1+ N ROYAL WAY JUANITA WAY N Ln 2 O �— 00 N .-- L-� r 17 BAY ESPLANADE p " T 2— 0 - r Cr . 21 N ld . �j L N M PROJECT NO: FUTURE PM PEAK HOUR- TRAFFIC VOLUME (2010) 08 -072 Gulf Coast Consulting, Inc. DATE: FIGURE: Land Development Consulting 122008 1 DRAWN BY: 3 G.J.S. a IV. CONCLUSION This analysis was conducted in accordance with a specific methodology established with City of Clearwater staff. This analysis demonstrates traffic operations at nearby intersections and on adjacent roadways would continue at acceptable levels of service with the project impacts. 3 CNM �1 W © d LL 0 APPENDIXA 0 3nN3AVAV7VaNVN -- -- -- -- -- - o . I E_ Q h °Si I L�, � I a m 1 ( ,LB 0,£69,9 N) 3,1*,zao 4—Li L im =J_ nva -JWU I ir r ;�� y d r '451;5. ys a _v_r� g''�Vlrj: $ rSi>:r'_e _ • �'� nn��rLY! •, ' ;•,'.'�� ,r '•� }• =' :��`;t:s.. ?rBC a 1. 9 � � 1 c' ;� a;� •taro /�,i.� ^�,��' "��T' ,� ,qr_4 S .,: it •,+ r eL. 7 i. q; . G {a . i.;a�'.", A V�q7Fj�.'' 'rZ tiS• D,� �� 'f'- 'fi.:•1 !`•�•' I `•;,�'q-„•'ifG+%: Jy.' �'+tC.s itt`••ti�';�' !r ?f -. }$, '/ � •."rrSFlwr'�• •srF��'�.'.'.';��'Ly`': ?� ?' �:�1'�`'..i y >� �9a� 1O i I O �� :�i'k�, #s"�%'x�.+'y,3 i1,�c ,f .l�..�(��'^aT:�y •tip, � x�T ^yl�F��•�;,,c •• r` � I ti..; ++•1.4rQ.t.°+�; T, i" C �`,'Vlf �� 4�.T�. ,+ + ' I � I 'S`• r�s "tiY' N�4,•�y� f.�:��s°��`:+�'t's�,,�• �,».��'csir� d (�,Z69B (�1% 3.6Z.LQ00 S 1 q,� ° iy �aty c,*• j lia a� � "'�1:��1>:�. Y7„'!ts�t r� I r 1 TIYM 7Ftl7 l� ,ta -7i� A•'1'� %'�_ �d? :i 'a- L-r ac- �h�, +.. % �� I -� :.Y s asC }x,;32 i� '1;,•n�t r, f��• ym��,y� _'� '� �'fr``ier",i:t �•S�'�"'n„ 2 �r;t `�� m I� ,;7: �t.��.4�, .�� ° �:� '�- � � � „x�r,r,l.t•.��•L��'.�: r,. � z .t, � a ''ww ,0{ ic�La <•''� >�aa �..��iiiasr� �• A2 z�' 7 L s. ��+ ,�° rd,p"isT'o �L• �.i, ki, Q .Tf' v vi '•�.t�'�7'� ai �.lr t X`l'� .y+• .T;'SF•!•'• �: u'..- �F+ . +"' •,tf y�' ?: M. s �� .a ,,rz fr piv 9' . •4'- `_•5,ai r..: • } r•.�{,'-'� r" Id : vx:?��.i_ 4: ��' ,,f�s,�"._i �.- '•;.'w,.�r��:R. } z"'k;�a•+r,�'.w;4'F.i,i;.' y�Z••.1 •u.5. 1 `' I ;'```�> �3`�4rgi'm' IN "N' ..1�' t }w yy7 C c Y5[�.y SY X aT �° Q I '• t. t a: T.titi ! ��Y �t�,��. :17a 'ern �.p T ••'f:.F3:• M+ '8 n 0 m I `' Iii• y ti8 � `I; >,; _ _ .: 1 . ii'•i O I r 3rsf�T�, p: - : � •L"E��g��i,}',�r{,:`Ta.`r ,, ,.- m 'y s. �„ fri� + Fr9��T` °^a�y,�'yt}sy tit • r � � ;"�• : i � • p ? • 1 � _-.'�• � ... v � a A� r., e' _ r . - y a tFY , •�. L• : + v � i ;. .i tf �,�. v `k -.... F • -.i = � �, ... : n• � ,� `e." 4r' ,T#`a', 's Y. f> •t� '+T � I �n ' 1: • r� . tfir?aV? rry � :>.•t7. a, A t - - n � �.. 2C. �a;�s7'4'��,`�'cr¢,�rx'�i,�""•i `t�. Ei7.�:�A.� • ,I �� i �as• ti• _ Yr� ''•�: �d £ ��0.,,�ik V�•,�; tr .{_R,9 ..+.,L �4•i .hri ,i', .y�•. {! 9% 4.} a,,�•( +5.' ,r, h �� ' � 41 . �T:� 1 f�' i;,. �itt •L•t> Y.'je�2."WF;i� . .. _•L�•Y %3� � ly�c b�•�•y - i{�'>x�`F'E�'rr",,i j s�'.S�i .C'� : d�ti !•�� 'dt 's +` rj `i„ ,'� „��y`,y�� •K'•{ °F'j•J= 4 • i� {.•yea ,��'•f6r tprr.,;� �A Y,yY�.�'s�ir�+a�y,.4��';f �.,G ' iY : tif• S.r,_` dig it`o-s• c r E1r -}`s g us3�`. IP �z• y�L`g4 u• r : t.1 axe o �.•A"',rlt�'�•tc!• `[;'r�' Y [n'��y ,(..iwr�.,.,fi.x. ,�na.r.. ft ��v`d t ^-•!'!` i'xNT ' I r Ai.rY .1:�i• tC•.}��'1.•�Y}a:�.1is`�g• ^15•S,Yt' �.tj•q N .h��:, iS :p'.i�.'-��b:.: �•�i. �• �• �•i.�' ;r'yi�.' f.�� I 7f}ryy��(u .�, cv cs{„a�s?T� j IFtiiyrt`,i it a x rtp 3 xtu�i +y Yia 'vim. +`i�T r. v �-La. �3u �i > i�7• rytT•.; iel lyC�j''t'• ;�+'?.�7�,�v^5�'t`'Y� ( VU. Z�i ..•r` ;r,,'M;d� ^;?`�`'�ry� -4. f C `� G i''•_•��, yk�' ar- :3i a•LyYT �{�'�f�•�.+F'.A�ji•3`r• 1,'� 4.tiW'�Y' � I •�' 4 i`,r•Cs it 1 S Yt ,�c,s il+• .y 4 T,:r•1•t, 'i. Y,, :_',�{• �� ! Ol ”. '% ta•',cA >43''.,: . •r:'4,+• q1 �i• J.- ��`y4•'''Tat Star'.{` s '�+�.L.i• 4'CL C'i L f;'A.G 1 Jam. .. Yiy ��L � , � � b' 'r .L•� }� � 'i%�d °'}i rfi yf �J'R� • • -•f< . •F� �• h s. ;.:•F J.'�rI�SS.sssc,ss '�,•�`• i' -',.e. S' .. t . t?L t •b� {Ya�i•'y ' �f.�',Cys �x�3�� 2 r�� < ' ".��,�:I:�Y. �rx �a' �~' r��7�a lti� N4�. i ^� �4 � : J. ti+Xb ��' :� >.:!',�„� i��•�. tr4�Ta K- r,� +•r`' t`I€ . �Y"" I v� ,. "y. ` ;z's ry)•x..• �`' 4..11 i`r � �'c'• -- �wvrr'A � n y.; �•- u C >y�r'0'p, � e , %,. ; q� ' r�•~� a• i : • .. 'Y�� 1 0 =y n i ''• �, � yt c x: � �;,; ' `�•�"�'^ z : �/t:�, � r,�?.n" 3 +ttY= "- .46 t r• s5 � " • a �'`' TrtifP �t �, �� zr•'�;. ��5',A;,�i..��K,s1, ` .. t. `c ��44'�r..:� �,�i �� '�St,•+'�y"ti• ;q��; ��,,�. Y'�:fy" •��1 '� !E�Y • Z•. y .a � •e�' �•r .��r •X �u> �,La('' ,1,•'N. ,!rT�„� '�c4 #"� ' �. a .. a...,;r.�T �:..�. �, .,, ss,°.f �Er: ..r.e, ,F.• � '�; SL lb � ONDMId J.1%4d5V 1 t 9{ ? I t d Detailed Report Page 1 of 2 HCS +'M DETAILED REPORT General Information Site Information Analyst Agency or Co. GCC Date Performed 121412008 Time Period PM PEAK Intersection MANDALAYBAY ESPLANADE Area Type All other areas Jurisdiction CLEARWATER Analysis Year EXISTING 2008 Project ID Volume and Timing Input EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT I TH RT LT TH RT Number of Lanes, Ni 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 Lane Group LTR LTR L TR LTR Volume, V (vph) 5 2 20 16 2 2 38 258 39 1 178 8 % Heavy Vehicles, %HV 2 2 2 2 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 10.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 10.85 Pretimed (P) or Actuated A A A A A A A A A A A A A Start-up Lost Time, 11 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Extension of Effective Green, e 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival Type, AT 3 3 3 3 3 Unit Extension, UE 3.0 13.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Filtering /Metering, 1 1.000 11.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Initial Unmet Demand, Qb 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Ped / Bike / RTOR Volumes 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Parking / Grade / Parking N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N Parking Maneuvers, Nm Buses Stopping, NB 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 Min. Time for Pedestrians, Gp 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2 Phasing EW Perm 02 03 04 NS Perm 06 07 08 Timing G= 7.0 G= G= G= G= 45.0 G= G= G= Y= 4 Y= Y= Y= IY= 4 Y= Y= 1Y= Duration of Analysis, T = 0.25 Cycle Length, C = 60.0 Lane Group Capacity, Control Delay, and LOS Determination EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Adjusted Flow Rate, v 32 23 45 350 219 Lane Group Capacity, c 185 164 868 1370 1388 v/c Ratio, X 0.17 0.14 0.05 0.26 0.16 Total Green Ratio, g/C 0.12 0.12 0.75 0.75 , . 0.75 Uniform Delay, di 23.9 23.8 2.0 2.3 2.1 Progression Factor, PF 1.000 1.000 11.000 1.000 ' 1.000 Delay Calibration, k 0.11 10.11 0.11 0.11 10.11 Incremental Delay, d2 0.4 0.4 0.0 0.1 1 0.1 file: / /C:\Documents and Settings\rpergolizzi,GCC\Local Settings \Temp \s2k2BA.tmp 12/4/2008 WGINAL RICEIVED FFg 10 2009 P�Ng � T CRY OF CLEARWA Detailed Report Page 2 of 2 Initial Queue Delay, d3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Control Delay 24.3 24.2 2.0 2.4 2.2 Lane Group LOS C C A A A Approach Delay 24.3 24.2 2.4 2.2 Approach LOS C C A A Intersection Delay 4.1 Xc = 0.24 Intersection LOS A Copyright © 2007 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS +rM Version 5.3 Generated: 12/4/2008 11:18 AM ORIGINAL. RECEIVED ccg 10 2009 PLANKNG DRVAiMT CHY OF CLAP WA file: / /C:\Documents and Settings\rpergolizzi.GCC\Loca1 Settings \Temp \s2k2BA.tmp 12/4/2008 Two -Way Stop Control Page 1 of 2 TWO -WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information ISite Information Analyst RP Intersection MANDALAY/KENDALL Agency/Co. GCC Jurisdiction CLEARWATER Date Performed 121412008 Analysis Year EXISTING 2008 Analysis Time Period PM PEAK IStudy Project Description East/West Street: KENDALL ST North /South Street: MANDALAYAVENUE Intersection Orientation: North -South IStudy Period hrs : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume veh/h) 9 256 0 0 174 2 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR veh /h 10 301 0 0 204 2 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 — — 2 -- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR Upstream Signal 1 0 0 Minor Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume veh/h) 5 0 5 8 0 0 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR veh /h 5 0 5 9 0 0 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 2 2 2 2 2 Percent Grade ( %) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR Delay, Queue Len at and Level of Service Approach Northbound Southbound Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LTR LTR LTR LTR (veh /h) 10 0 9 10 C (m) (veh/h) 1365 1260 454 593 lc 0.01 0.00 0.02 0.02 95% queue length 0.02 0.00 0.06 0.05 Control Delay (s /veh) 7.7 7.9 13.1 11.2 LOS A A B B pproach Delay — — 13.1 11.2 file: / /C:\Documents and Settings\rpergolizzi.GCC\Local Settings \Temp \u2k2BE.tmp 12/4/2008 0 • ® cz cr. S C) 03- • Two -Way Stop Control • Page 2 of 2 s /veh pproach LOS -- — B B Copyright © 2007 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS +TM Version 5.3 Generated: 12/4/2008 11:25 AM ®R1GOW j CE ® W 0 2009 W Cfly OF CLWWAXV file: / /CADocuments and Settings\rpergolizzi.GCC\Local Settings \Temp \u2k2BE.tmp 12/4/2008 Two -Way Stop Control neral Information TWO -WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Site Information Analyst RP Agency/Co. GCC Date Performed 121512008 Analysis Time Period PM PEAK Page 1 of 2 Intersection MANDALAY / ROYAL WAY Jurisdiction CLEARWATER Analysis Year EXISTING 2008 Major Street Northbound Project Description East/West Street: ROYAL WAY /GLENDALE ST. North /South Street: MANDALAYAVENUE Intersection Orientation: North -South IStudy Period hrs : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume veh/h) 5 251 11 3 183 2 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR veh /h 5 269 11 3 196 2 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 — — 2 — — Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR Upstream Signal 0 1 0 Minor Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume veh/h) 0 0 2 19 0 2 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR veh /h 0 0 2 20 0 2 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 2 2 2 2 2 Percent Grade ( %) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR Delay, Queue Len at and Level of Service Approach Northbound Southbound Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LTR LTR LTR LTR (veh /h) 5 3 22 2 C (m) (veh /h) 1375 1283 503 844 lc 0.00 0.00 0.04 0.00 95% queue length 0.01 0.01 0.14 0.01 Control Delay (s /veh) 7.6 7.8 12.5 9.3 LOS I A I A 8 A file: / /C:\Documents and Settings\rpergolizzi.GCC\Local Settings \Temp \u2k2ED.tmp 12/5/2008 0 0 C" C= cc Two -Way Stop Control 0 Page 2 of 2 Copyright © 2007 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS +TM Version 5.3 Generated: 12/5/2008 8:01 AM Of cu file : /CADocuments and Setdngs\rpergolizzi.GCC\Loca1 Settings \Temp \u2k2E9.tmp .-12/5/2008 2007 Peak Season Factor Category Report - Report Type: DISTRICT ` Category: 1500 PINELLAS COUNTYWIDE MOM 0.94 Week Dates SF PSCF 1 01/01/2007 - 01/06/2007 1.09 1.17 2 01/07/2007 - 01/13/2007 1.05 1.12 3 01/14/2007 - 01/20/2007 1.02 1.09 4 01/21/2007 - 01/27/2007 1.01 1.08 5 01/28/2007 - 02/03/2007 0.99 1.06 6 02/04/2007 - 02/10/2007 0.98 1.05 * 7 02/11/2007 - 02/17/2007 0.96 1.03 * 8 02/16/2007 - 02/24/2007 0.95 1.02 * 9 02/25/2007 - 03/03/2007 0.94 1.00 *10 03/04/2007 - 03/10/2007 0.93 0.99 *11 03/11/2007 - 03/17/2007 0.91 0.97 *12 03/18/2007 - 03/24/2007 0.92 0.98 ' *13 03/25/2007 - 03/31/2007 0.92 0.98 *14 04/01/2007 - 04/07/2007 0.92 0.98 *15 04/08/2007 - 04/14/2007 0.92 0.98 *16 04/15/2007 - 04/21/2007 0.93 0.99 *17 04/22/2007 - 04/28/2007 0.94 1.00 *18 04/29/2007 - 05/05/2007 0.95 1.02 *19 05/06/2007 - 05/12/2007 0.97 1.04 20 05/13/2007 - 05/19/2007 0.98 1.05 21 05/20/2007 - 05/26/2007 0.99 1.06 22 05/27/2007 - 06/02/2007 0.99 1.06 23 06/03/2007 - 06/09/2007 1.00 1.07 24 06/10/2007 - 06/16/2007 1.00 1.07 25 -06/17/2007 - 06/23/2007 1.00 .1.07 26 06/24/2007 - 0'6/30/2007 1.00 1.07 27 07/01/2007 - 07/07/2007 1.00 1.07 28 07/08/2007 - 07/14/2007 0.99 1.06 29 07/15/2007 - 07/21/2007 0.99 1.06 30 07/22/2007 - 07/28/2007 1.00 1.07 31 07/29/2007 - 08/04/2007 1.01 1.08 32 08/05/2007 - 08/11/2007 1.02 1.09 33 08/12/2007 - 08/18/2007 1.03 1.10 34 08/19/2007 - 08/25/2007 1.03 1.10 35 08/26/2007 - 09/01/2007 1.04 1.11 36 09/02/2007 - 09/08/2007 1.04 1.11 C 37 09/09/2007 - 09/15/2007 1.05 1.12 a9 38 39 09/16/2007 - 09/23/2007 - 09/22/2007 09/29/2007 1.05 1.04 1.12 1.11 . � 40 09/30/2007 - 10/06/2007 1.04 1.11 °41 41 42 10/07/2007 - 10/14/2007 - 10/13/2007 10/20/2007 1.04 1.03 1.11 1.10 9- 43 10/21/2007 - 10/27/2007 1.04 1.11_ 44 10/28/2007 - 11/03/2007 1.04 1.11 " 45 11/04/2007 - 11/10/2007 1.05 1.12 46 11/11/2007 - 11/17/2007 1.05 1.12 d� ` 47 11/18/2007 - 11/24/2007 1.06 1.13 48 11/25/2007 - 12/01/2007 1.07 1.14 49 12/02/2007 - 12/08/2007 1.0 1.15 50 12/09/2007 - 12/15/2007 1.09 1.17 51 12/16/2007 - 12/22/2007 1:06 1.13 52 12/23/2007 - 12/29/2007 1.04 1.11 53 12/30/2007 - 12/31/2007 1.02 1.09 * Peak Season Page 1 of 2 N i • TABLE 4 -4 GENERALIZED PEAK HOUR TWO -WAY VOLUMES FOR FLORIDA'S URBANIZED AREAS UNINTERRUPTED FLOW HIGHWAYS Class II (2.00 to 4.50 signalized intersections per mile) FREEWAYS Interchange spacing > 2 mi. apart Level of Service Lanes Divided A B C D 2 Undivided 210 730 1,450 2,060 4 Divided 1,940 3,140 4,540 5,870 6 Divided 2,900 4,700 6,800 8,810 STATE TWO -WAY ARTERIALS Class I ( >0.00 to 1.99 signalized intersections per mile) 4 2,310 Level of Service Lanes Divided A B C D 2 Undivided ** 400 1,310 1,560 4 Divided 460 2,780 3,300 3,390 6 Divided 700 4,240 4,950 5,080 8 Divided 890 5,510 6,280 6,440 Class II (2.00 to 4.50 signalized intersections per mile) FREEWAYS E 1,610 k ## kk# kkk Interchange spacing > 2 mi. apart Level of Service Bicycle Lane Level of Service Lanes Divided A E C D Level of Service 2 Undivided ** 2,620 Lanes A B C D E 6,670 4 2,310 3,840 5,350 6,510 7,240 10,010 6 3,580 5,930 8,270 10,050 11,180 13,130 8 4,840 8,d20 11,180 13,600 15,130 20,560 10 6,110 10,110 14,110 17,160 19,050 6 Divided *% ** 3,170 4,450 4,690. 12 7,360 12,200 17,020 20,710 23,000 E 1,610 k ## kk# kkk Class III (more than 4.5 signalized intersections per mile and not within primary city central business district of an urbanized area over 750,000) Interchange spacing < 2 mi. apart Paved Shoulder Level of Service Bicycle Lane Level of Service Lanes Divided A B C D E 2 Undivided ** 180 1,070 1,460 1,550 4 Divided ** 390 2,470 3,110 3,270 6 Divided ** 620 . 3,830 4,680 4,920 8' Divided ** 800 5,060 6,060 6,360 Class III (more than 4.5 signalized intersections per mile and not within primary city central business district of an urbanized area over 750,000) Interchange spacing < 2 mi. apart BICYCLE MODE (Note: Level of service for the bicycle mode in this table is based on roadway geometries at 40 mph posted speed and traffic conditions, not number of bicyclists using the facility.) (Multiply motorized vehicle volumes shown below by number of directional roadway lanes to determine two -way maximum service volumes.) Paved Shoulder Level of Service Bicycle Lane Level of Service Lanes A B C D E 4 2,050 3,350 4,840 6,250 7,110 6 3,240 5,250 7,600 9,840 11,180 8 4,420 7,160 10,360 13,420 15,240 10 5,600 9,070 13,130 16,980 19,310 12 6,780 10,980 15,890 20,560 23,360 BICYCLE MODE (Note: Level of service for the bicycle mode in this table is based on roadway geometries at 40 mph posted speed and traffic conditions, not number of bicyclists using the facility.) (Multiply motorized vehicle volumes shown below by number of directional roadway lanes to determine two -way maximum service volumes.) Paved Shoulder Level of Service Bicycle Lane Level of Service Lanes Divided A B C D E Coverage A B C D E 2 Undivided ** ** 500 1,200 1,470 0-49% ** ** 310 1,310 >1,310 4 Divided ** ** 1,180 2,750 3,120 50 -84% ** 240 390 >390 * ** 6 Divided ** ** 1,850 4,240 4,690 85 -100% 300 680 >680 * ** * ** 8 Divided ** ** 2,450 5,580 6,060 PEDESTRIAN MODE Class IV (more than 4.5 signalized intersections per mile and within (Note: Level of service for the pedestrian mode in this table is based on roadway primary city central business district of an urbanized area geometries at 40 mph posted speed and traffic conditions, not number of pedestrians over 750,000) using the facility.) (Multiply motorized vehicle volumes shown below by number Level of Service of directional roadway lanes to determine two-way maximum service volumes.) Lanes Divided A B C D E Level of Service 2 Undivided ** ** 490 1,310 1,420 Sidewalk Coverage A B C D E 4 Divided ** ** 1,170 2,880 3,010 0-49% *" ** ** 600 1,480 6 Divided "* *" 1,810 4,350 4,520 50 -84% *" ** ** 940 1,800 8 Divided ** ** 2,460 5,690 5,910 85 -100% *" 210 1,080 >1,080 kkk BUS MODE (Scheduled Fixed Route) - NON -STATE ROADWAYS Major City /County Roadways MpNoXLAY (Buses per hour) . Level of Service Arta (Note: Buses per hour shown are only for the peak hour in the single direction of higher traffic flow.) Lanes Divided A B C E Level of Service 2 Undivided *" ** 870 1390 1,480 Sidewalk Coverage A B C P2 E 4 Divided ** ** 2,030 2,950 i 3,120 0 -84% "* >5 ?4 >3 ?2 6 Divided *% ** 3,170 4,450 4,690. 85 -100% >6 >4 2:3 >2 2:1 ` ARTERIAL/NON -STATE ROADWAY ADJUSTMENTS. Other Signalized Roadways (alter corresponding volume by the indicated percent) (signalized intersection analysis) Level of Service Lanes Median Left Turns Lanes Adjustment Factors Lanes Divided A .4 B, C D E 2 Divided Yes +5% 2 Undivided .', ** ** 450 950 1,200 2 Undivided No -20% 4 Divided - �7 ** ' * * 1,050 2,070 2,400 Multi Undivided Yes -5% Multi Undivided No -25% Source: Florida Department of Transportation 05/17/07 Systems Planning "Office 605 Suwannee Street, MS 19 ONE -WAY FACILITIES Tallahassee, FL 32399 -0450 Multiply the corresponding two - directional volumes in this table by 0.6. http: /Avww.dot te.fl.us/Pl=3ing/systems/sm/Ios/default.htn "Values shown are presented as hourly two -way volumes for levels of service and are for the automabile/huck modes unless specifically stated. Although presented as peak hour two -way volumes, they actually represent peak hour peak direction conditions with an applicable D factor applied. This table does not constitute a standard and should be used only for general planning applications. The computer models from which this table is derived should be used for more specific planning applications The table and deriving computer models should not be used for corridor or intersection design, where more refined techniques racist Level of service letter grade thresholds are probably not comparable across modes and, therefore, cross modal comparisons should be made with caution. Furthermore, combining levels of service of different modes into one overall roadway level of service is not recommended. Calculations are based on planning applications of the Highway Capacity Manual, Bicycle LOS Model, Pedestrian LOS Model and Transit Capacity and Quality of Service Manual, respectively for the automobilahruck, bicycle, pedestrian and bus modes. "Cannot be achieved using table input value defaults. * **Not applicable for that level of service letter grade. For armmobilehtuck modes, volumes greater than level of service D become F because intersection capacities have been reached For bicycle and pedestrian modes the level of service letter grade (including F) is not achievable, because there is no maximum vehicle volume threshold using table inputs value defaults. • 0 ow J i APPENDIX Owq r po i t Hotel (310) Average Vehicle Trip Ends vs: Rooms On a: Weekday ®R1GbN& RECEIVED Number of Studies: 10 Average Number of Rooms: 476 efff OF CLWA"�k Directional Distribution: 50% entering, 50% exiting Trip Generation per Room Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation 8.17 3.47 - 9.58 3.38 Data Plot and Equation - 18,000 X 17,000 .. -, . • . • 16,000 -- .• -- • . -- - -- - .. .. 15,000 ......... .......... -- - -•---- ....•..- _:....:. 14,000 . . . . . , •. -------- . • -- ... . . -- 13,000 --: -. ; -- .. ....:. . .. ... :....:. :....: :... .. , c 12,000 -- - - -- -, .. _. .. .. . . .. . . W 1. 11,000 -- . - -- .. .. .. ....... .e ...... - -- -- - -- - 10,000 ,... _,_....._._,....._......_....., ;-- - -• ... 73 ��. , 9,000 • • .. oM 8,000 ' - - - -- --------- .......... ..... :. ..:........ .... ..._...__ ... ca > 7,000 . . . . . . . . . • . Q ; ; ; 6,000 .. . . . . . • -. • . . - - -; . .. _ ; ;- ; 5,000 ........ 4,000 - - - . . . . • . . . . . . 3,000 ............. . .. - •• -• - - : - -- .. ._ ,_.. --------- -------- . -• 2,000 . .. . _ _ .. .. _ X,. 1,000 .. , •. .. . .• .. . . . . , . . . . 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 1900 X = Number of Rooms X Actual Data Points Fitted Curve ---- -- Average Rate Fitted Curve Equation: T = 8.95(X) - 373.16 R2 = 0.98 Trip Generation, 8th Edition 580 Institute of Transportation Engineers Resort Hotel lZaCe M (330) FFi 10 209 MAIN t- . CKY Average Vehicle Trip Ends vs: Rooms OF WAWA On a: Weekday, Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic, One Hour Between 7 and 9 a.m. .Number of Studies: 7 Average Number of Rooms: 504 Directional Distribution: 72% entering, 28% exiting Trip Generation per Room Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation 0.31 0.24 - 0.41 0.57 Data Plot ancil Equation 400 300 M C W Q F- m U L 200 CD a) (Tl a� Q F- 100 0 300 400 500 600 X = Number of Rooms X Actual Data Points Fitted Curve Fitted Curve Equation: T = 0.40(X) - 40.79 700 800 900 -- - - -- Average Rate R2 = 0.75 Trip Generation, 8th Edition 654 Institute of Transportation Engineers X ,X X , X . -----X---X X-- -- -------- ----- ---- -- -- ----- ---- ....................... 700 800 900 -- - - -- Average Rate R2 = 0.75 Trip Generation, 8th Edition 654 Institute of Transportation Engineers ORIGINM Resort Hotel RICEMD �'"R 10 2009 (330) PVl Nlg Average Vehicle Trip Ends vs: Rooms Uffy Of CLEARWA ", On a: Weekday, Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic, One Hour Between 4 and 6 p.m. Number of Studies: 10 Average Number of Rooms: 495 Directional Distribution: 43% entering, 57% exiting Trip Generation per Room Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation 0.42 0.19 - 0.51 0.65 Data Plot and Equation 500 400 uJ a c W a 300 N U t N a, 200 Q F- 100 ;X - --•----- ,-- - - - --- X... ;__... - - - - -- - - - - -- X; X X ,X i N X , X ; 0 , 100 200 300 400 500 X = Number of Rooms X Actual Data Points Fitted Curve Fitted Curve Equation: Ln(T) =1.44 Ln(X) - 3.62 Trip Generation, 8th Edition 600 700 800 900 - - - - -- Average Rate R2 = 0.93 • 655 Institute of Transportation Engineers Deidled Report . Page 1 cLf-2 �f HCS +' DETAILED REPORT General Information Site Information Analyst 121412008 Agency or Co. GCC Date Performed 121412008 Date Time Period PM PEAK Intersection MANDALAYBAY CX use M ESPLANADE 0 CX Type All other areas U- Jurisdiction CLEARWATER Analysis Year FUTURE WITH PROJECT Project ID Volume and Timing Input EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH I RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Number of Lanes, Ni 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 Lane Group LTR LTR L TR LTR Volume, V (vph) 5 2 21 17 2 2 40 284 41 1 207 8 % Heavy Vehicles, %HV 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 2 2 2 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 10.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 10.85 0.85 Pretimed (P) or Actuated A A A A A A A A A A A A A Start -up Lost Time, 11 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Extension of Effective Green, e 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival Type, AT 3 3 3 3 3 Unit Extension, UE 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Filtering /Metering, 1 1.000 1.000 1.000 11.000 1.000 Initial Unmet Demand, Qb 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Ped / Bike / RTOR Volumes 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lane Width 12.0 1 12.0 1 12.0 12.0 12.0 Parking / Grade / Parking N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N Parking Maneuvers, Nm Buses Stopping, NB 0 0 0 0 0 Min. Time for Pedestrians, Gp 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2 Phasing EW Perm 02 03 04 NS Perm 06 07 08 Timing G= 7.0 IY= G= G= G= G= 45.0 G= G= G= ly= 4 1Y= Y= Y= IY= 4 Y= Y= Duration of Analysis, T = 0.25 Cycle Length, C = 60.0 Lane Group aci , Control Delay and LOS Determination EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT I TH RT Adjusted Flow Rate, v 33 24 47 382 254 Lane Group Capacity, c 185 163 841 1371 1390 v/c Ratio, X 0.18 0.15 0.06 0.28 0.18 Total Green Ratio, g/C 0.12 0.12 0.75 0.75 0.75 Uniform Delay, di 23.9 123.8 2.0 12.4 2.2 Progression Factor, PF 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Delay Calibration, k 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 Incremental Delay, d2 0.5 0.4 0.0 0.1 0.1 file:XADocuments and Settings\rpergolizzi.GCC\Local Settings \Temp \s2k2D0.ttnp 12/4/2008 Detailed Report . i Page 2 of 2 Initial Queue Delay, d3 0.0 Q C 0.0 (� 0 0.0 0.0 L� IXy 0" Cr 0.0 Control Delay rc 24.4 24.2 2.0 2.5 2.2 Lane Group LOS C C A A A Approach Delay 24.4 24.2 2.4 2.2 Approach LOS C C A A Intersection Delay 4.0 Xc = 0.27 Intersection LOS A Copyright 0 2007 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS +TM Version 5.3 Generated: 12/4/2005 11:55 Am file: //CADocuments and Setti.ngs\rpergolizzi.GCC\Local Settings \Temp \s2k2D0.tmp 12/4/2008 t�— Q C (� 0 C) '--4 - L� IXy 0" Cr i 0 � rc file: //CADocuments and Setti.ngs\rpergolizzi.GCC\Local Settings \Temp \s2k2D0.tmp 12/4/2008 Two -Way Stop Control Page 1 of 2 TWO -WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information ISite Information Analyst RP Intersection MANDALAY/KENDALL Agency/Co. GCC Jurisdiction CLEARWATER Date Performed 121412008 Analysis Year FUTURE WITH PROJECT Analysis Time Period PM PEAK Intersection Orientation: North -South Project Description East/West Street: KENDALL ST North /South Street: MANDALAYAVENUE Intersection Orientation: North -South IStudy Period hrs : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume veh/h) 25 266 0 0 181 2 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR veh /h 29 312 0 0 212 2 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 — — 2 — — Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume veh/h) 5 0 27 8 0 0 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR veh /h 5 0 31 9 0 0 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 2 2 2 2 2 Percent Grade ( %) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR Delay, Queue Len at and Level of Service Approach Northbound Southbound Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LTR LTR LTR LTR (veh /h) 29 0 9 36 C (m) (veh /h) 1356 1248 391 727 /c 0.02 0.00 0.02 0.05 95% queue length 0.07 0.00 0.07 0.16 Control Delay (s /veh) 7.7 7.9 14.4 10.2 LOS A A 8 8 Approach Delay — — 14.4 10.2 file: //C:\Documents and Settings\rpergolizzi.GCC\Local Settings \Temp \u2k2D4.tmp 12/4/2008 co Two -Way Stop Control . Page 2 of 2 Approach LOS -- — 8 8 . Copyright © 2007 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS +TM Version 5.3 Generated: 12/4/2008 12:05 PM file: / /CADocuments and Settings\rpergolizzi.GCC\Local Settings \Temp \u2k2D4.tmp 12/4/2008 ' Two -Way Stop Control • Page 1 of 2 TWO -WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information ISite Information A AA A/r1 Al A \/ /r]/1 \ /AI - -- Analyst RP Intersection VL '" AIY /^"" ' "" """ WAY enc /Co. GCC Jurisdiction CLEARWATER Date Performed 121512008 Analysis Year FUTURE WITH PROJECT Analysis Time Period PM PEAK East/West Street: ROYAL WAY /GLENDALE ST. - -- Project Description East/West Street: ROYAL WAY /GLENDALE ST. North /South Street: MANDALAYAVENUE Intersection Orientation: North -South IStudy Period hrs : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume veh/h) 5 261 11 3 190 2 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR veh /h 5 280 11 3 204 2 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 — — 2 — — Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR Upstream Signal 0 1 0 Minor Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R olume veh/h) 0 0 2 20 0 2 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR veh /h 0 0 2 21 0 2 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 2 2 2 2 2 Percent Grade ( %) 0, 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR Delay, Queue Len qt and Level of Service Approach Northbound Southbound Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LTR LTR LTR LTR (veh /h) 5 3 23 2 C (m) (veh /h) 1365 1271 487 836 lc 0.00 0.00 0.05 0.00 95% queue length 0.01 0.01 0.15 0.01 Control Delay (s /veh) 7.6 7.8 12.8 9.3 LOS A A 8 A file: //C:\Documents and Setdngs\rpergolizzi.GCC\Local Settings \Temp \iz2k2ED.tmp 12/5/2008 0 0 Q o N.0 b � b 60 1 i Two -Warr Stop Control .L pproach Delay s /veh pproach LOS — — Copyright © 2007 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved jjCEID_ i 0 2009 } s- 12.8 8 HCS +TM Version 5.3 0 Page 2 of 2 9.3 A Generated: 12/5/2006 8:04 AM file: //C:\Documents and Settings\rpergolizzi.GCC \Local Settings \Temp \u2k2ED.tmp 12/5/2008 Norths1de STORMWATER REPORT Civil Land Planning Due Diligence Reports Re- Zoning, Land Use, Annexation Stormwater Management Utility Design Traffic Construction Administration AMBIANCE ON WHITE SAND UJUE P.O. Box 4948 Clearwater, FL 33758 -4948 tech @northsideengineering.com 727 443 2869 Fax 727 446 8036 DEC 01 2000 CITY Qi CLb'."V rd LU `� °.�. F:.. , • • ; • ' C'a� � Y'1 /25/08 Drainage narrative • The proposed construction consists of the following activities: 1- Removal of 15,996 SF of impervious area (13,596 SF of impervious area is already removed) Please see the demolition plan attached to the drainage report. 2- Construction of retention/detention vault to provide attenuation and treatment for the project site. 3- The water quality treatment will be achieved through the under drain. 1. PROJECT NAME: PROJECT NO.: EXISTING CONDITIONS TOTAL DRAINAGE AREA= IMP. AREA= POND AREA= PERV. AREA= C CALCULATIONS TOTAL DRAINAGE AREA= IMP. AREA= POND AREA= PERV. AREA= Ambiance on white sands # 817 26,076 SF = 0.60 ACRES 15,996 SF = 0.37 ACRES 0 SF = 0.00 ACRES 10,080 SF = 0.23 ACRES 26,076 SF 15,996 SF OF IMP. AREA @ C = 0 SF OF POND AREA @ C = 10,080 SF OF PERV. AREA @ C = C = 0.37 T.O.C. = 60 MINUTES PROPOSED CONDITIONS TOTAL DRAINAGE AREA= IMP. AREA= POND AREA= PERV. AREA= C CALCULATIONS TOTAL DRAINAGE AREA= IMP. AREA= POND AREA= PERV. AREA= 26,076 SF = 21,850 SF = 0 SF = 4,226 SF = 0.60 ACRES 0.50 ACRES 0.00 ACRES 0.10 ACRES 26,076 SF 21,850 SF OF IMP. AREA @ C = 0 SF OF POND AREA @ C = 4,226 SF OF PERV. AREA @ C = C = 0.83 T.O.C. = 60 MINUTES H - DEC 01 20� 0.475 1 0.2 0.95 1 0.2 PROJECT: Ambiance on white sands PROJECT NO. # 817 RUN -OFF COEFFICIENTS PRE- CONSTRUCTION TOTAL DRAINAGE AREA= IMP. AREA= POND AREA= PERV. AREA= C= 0.37 POST- CONSTRUCTION TOTAL DRAINAGE AREA= IMP. AREA= POND AREA= PERV.AREA= C= 0.83 STORAGE CALCULATION WEIR DESIGN PRE - CONSTRUCTION DRAINAGE AREA = TIME OF CONC. Tc = I @ Tc =60 (25 YEAR EVENT)= Q(out)= CXIXA= POST - CONSTRUCTION U 26,076 SF 0.60 AC 15,996 SF OF IMP. AREA @ C = 0.475 0 SF OF POND AREA @ C = 1 10,080 SF OF PERV. AREA @ C = 0.2 26,076 SF 0.60 AC 21,850 SF OF IMP. AREA @ C = 0.95 0 SF OF POND AREA @ C = 1 4,226 SF OF PERV. AREA @ C = 0.2 0.60 AC 60 MIN 3.60 IN /HR 0.79 CFS TIME MIN. I IN /HR Q(in) CFS INFLOW CF OUTFLOW CF STORAGE CF 60.00 3.601 1.791 6,4271 2,8601 3,567 PRE - CONSTRUCTION WATER QUALITY DEPTH = TOTAL VOLUME REQUIRED = TOTAL VOLUME PROVIDED = MAX. STORAGE = 3,567 CF DRAINAGE AREA = TIME OF CONC. Tc = I @ Tc =10 (25 YEAR EVENT)= Q(out)= CXIXA= TOP. OF WEIR ELEV.= 5.40 FT BOT. OF WEIR ELEV.= 4.45 FT H = 0.95 FT Q = 1.89 CFS L =Q/3.1 "H ^1.5 = 0.66 FT or 8" 0.5 in. MAX. STORAGE REQUIRED = MAX. STORAGE PROVIDED = 0.60 AC 10 MIN 8.50 IN/HR r 1.89 CFS_' ._--, Ll tit y_ 3,567 CF 3,764 CF PROJECT NAME: Ambiance on white sands PROJECT NO.: # 817 POND STAGE STORAGE DATA: T.O.V. EL.= D.H.W. 25 EL.= W.Q. EL.= BOTTOM EL.= STAGE ft -NGVD AREA SF AREA AC STORAGE CF 6.00 2,676 0.061 5,352 5.40 2,676 0.061 3,746 5.00 2,676 0.061 2,676 4.60 2,676 0.061 1,606 4.45 2,676 0.061 1,204 4.20 2,676 0.061 535 4.00 2,676 0.061 0 TOTAL WATER QUALITY CALCULATIONS: DRAINAGE AREA = REQUIRED WATER QUALITY DEPTH = REQUIRED WATER QUALITY VOLUME = PROPOSED OUTFALL ELEVATION = AVAILABLE WATER QUALITY VOLUME = 26,076 SF 0.50 IN 1,087 CF 4.45 FT 1,204 CF c'" PROJECT: PROJECT NO.: NORTHSIDE ENGINEERING SERVICES POND DRAWDOWN ANALYSIS Ambiance on white sands # 817 VOLUME PROVIDED = 1,204 C.F. BOTTOM OF SLOT ELEV. = 4.45 BOTTOM OF POND ELEV. = 4.00 UNDERDRAIN INVERT ELEV. = 2.40 COEFFICIENT OF PERMEABILITY (K) = 0.09 FT /MIN LENGTH OF UNDERDRAIN = 30 FT SIZE OF UNDERDRAIN = 6 INCH POND AREA (SF) = 2,676 S.F. POND AREA (SF) = 2,676 S.F. ELEV. AVG. HEAD INCR HEAD L (AVG) HYD. GRAD. FILTER AREP FLOW POND AREA [NCR VOL. INCR TIME FT FT FT FT FT /FT S.F. CFM S.F. C.F. MIN. 4.45 2,676 1.74 0.11 2.75 0.63 47 2.69 301 112 4.34 2,676 1.63 0.11 2.75 0.59 47 2.51 301 120 4.23 2,676 1.52 0.11 2.75 0.55 47 2.34 301 129 4.11 2,676 1.41 0.11 2.75 0.51 47 2.17 301 139 4.00 2,676 TOTAL DRAWDOWN VOLUME _ TOTAL DRAWDOWN TIME = 1,204 C.F. 8.3 HOURS I� \`�, worts I ai1 a4 LO V S wi 0.39 E mot° _A,_._:_.�;L _ � � +11 �: _:_ \..�d4 � ASPHALT �:�. � atL — — ...yep: � �;� �yt � � � �:I* BW 1.79E VE 6E aPkyy•P, A VDiDit' k• ti - ..• - - - . r _ - - - - I �� k ¢ =X+ a 1 �w � 0 = �tad � = a.� � y g `ry y8 IAN g w. z99 a cowc ,�1 qty s . fA 11�r70' ®i ?� ed� 6 G�°�:' l;' ..r'tr....• t � y -c✓ :ir/ r °rs • '' E • .• r IIt10a` :P i .+r ..•r b I�y----------.—'i fir` r DL SR7i& .p 0 k?M1 ". � K /./,,j�if. ,�„ 2i� d�,s,+'i�,r' •COI�C' ns� � ...; � i,+' .L+, _ � cRaIE sz T .�.r /.r__- /.,✓ ✓. % /.�r:�t'DRIYv E aYfSDE .+: 7 e • a- w, t�. '.��. L .L. I I r:t' 1h ! 1.2 Building Line per plat L L LLL �• ., ♦ 5 ,' 4 :�01' LL: LL €_ { 1 I_TI 9 P plot-,' / ,. .LLL7- S70RY_ Building Line per (sealed from plot) 1 +, L L L I CONC - •� - R .�S'TORY.Lt ! {FRAME = (scaled from plot) oc ter PIPE Ldg L.• ►� a� 8 e z ' I i=I LL Ian 7 + :� r c!b ` aLLt LLL I C L �'� L FRAM l i BLDG. - 2-STORY e' _ LLLL2�LLLLLLL «° Li„LLLLL .'`.; °t" `�L 3 R. BLDG. I. _LLL a7 - MASONRY 7 &Ee�17�LLLLLL L'Crl :T� LLL II c' , «.' 1= STORY -L I` BLDG. LLLLLL LL !:'. L sL�LLL`�: ` ,L FRAME = �LL� Lim LLg �. I:. 11 !- s !11 y . Li2- STORY�-,_� LL ,,K, L DUPLEX- LL LLLLLL Ll _LCLLL LLLLL�-SY{,J; ILL'�i':_-'�`' "• -_€„ i23 I' fd_� LLLLi� I LL(�giL -t�:L ASPHALT L{ FRAME LLL 7 ,', LiAGLLIAASONRYLLdLL j'. ti� LLLLLLL L L� —. L W Ll BLDG. 3 LL i . t�L L BLDG- LLLLL� L -LL LLLLL�L{p I, 5 LL g' 7 LL _ LLB LL I LLLL LLIL.LL L LLB L �.yy..�.LLh� LL e� L LLi�L�,,II L tp r. x i1.L Pf, L LLL WOOD tps� *�g y :� I LLLLLLLf' !� \�"� . II' ;�Llt STORY -L LLL. LE L _. tpE� �, a ' C0 b • t; � ' L .LLLLL'�3f L 4na.ti•+Yye!47 4� a y 7 Ipp L.{ FRAME ' �a V LLLLLLLLLL' L e \ { ^T DUPLEX Ig ', 1. 67�sJ 8 I 1 v I { �( FRAME B DE OLL 3 4 L I y�' aDfX a - SHED i�1rr,f r € L'L`CC° O1 _% LL5 kyn� T;;�� fee fi, PAtto ON LLLLLLLL I LL�.� �LLafS ,�y n. %'a e•,PL —J e` w �D ° O ak. LLLLLLLL e4' 3 9LL i Lj'L �x! n.1.� .R° . a e usl�sEr 0' o LLLLLLL L {LI,LELLe"s�tLL- 7 5 Co BLDG. ^I L P/ 1I�177-I !t 1! E L n �S � < s:C✓- _..-- �{"It- SfORT_L •+! •LLL 1 1 � A 5 � LI FRAME _ s t LLL 3 I! �%� L - Q CONC • I it. e1 larmc % , Lu oe k ' J N ' lL�LLLLLL.L.LLL, 4 C!FO s� <• txf m tmao ''� LLt -STORY / r LLLM RY- srePS Pb e• Q BLDG. ON MASOM °' "� L�'.�.,!,,- -•� LLL• �5'xr LLLLLLLLL ✓% 2jy� F LLLLLLLL. i LLLL _LLL LLLLLLL g's LLLLLLLII t r ,,., ��, - L2- STORY_L ASPHALT r �'� {v l LMASONRY -{ K ILL_ B W A a ,p - j'°iy•.,rrLL.L...L{ Nl UIII!/Y POLE /LF7,OG7/ONS ro BE ODORDINAIED WITH J ; �% . i I� �r -� LLLL LLL t • p -4 1HE OWNERS OF SUCH FAgU116 AS -NOTED ON DRAWINGS l LpjI THE POLE RELOCATIONS MILL AccavYODtTE THE PROPOSED LLLLLLLL SIDEWALK RAID /OR DRNE APRONS INSTAI1A YON W1TMN z, °•' LLLLLLLL r. F LLLLLLLLL' THE R1ONf -0 -WAYS OF 7Nf SIILFE7S f'- LLLLLLLLL`'I ,t r'e LLLLLLLLL{,�� lip L LL JP ht LLLLL LLL _L _ fir L LLLLij CAIE Building Line per plot k�1 ��- LLLLLL, d — — — — — — — — — — — — ` Lll:� BuAding Line per plat � (scaled from plot) kR r < i; .• ?LLLLLLLLL scaled from lot u..Sl-Ib�....ia♦ �... �4v..r�c L " a& \ b�k a� _ a s ` M4 b I\ 1A1vY 228 KEVDALL STREET ASPHALT 4 .................................................... M t . ... .............................. o . 0 PARKING STUDY FOR AMBIANCE ON WHITE SANDS HOTEL CLEARWATER BEACH, FLORIDA PREPARED FOR: UDAY LELE PREPARED BY: GULF COAST CONSULTING, INC. REVISED JANUARY 2009 PROJECT # 08 -072 w � ku cr Ej obert Pergolizg, OP, PTP a AICP 99023, PTP 0133 ' C I. INTRODUCTION The applicant is proposing to redevelop property located at 15 -17 Avalon Street and 16 Kendall Street on Clearwater Beach into a 90 room hotel. (See Figure 1) The redevelopment of the property is the subject of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment in Tourist "T" zoning district. This application requires an assessment of the parking characteristics of the redevelopment. Based on City of Clearwater requirements, on -site parking should include one (1) space per hotel room. This would result in a code requirement of 90 parking spaces. A parking garage proposed to contain 97 spaces will be constructed. The City of Clearwater has requested a detailed analysis estimating the number of parking spaces actually needed to service the proposed hotel based on site specific operations. As a result of comments received at the January 8, 2009 DRC meeting this study was revised to reflect 80% of hotel employees needing a parking space. H. PARKING SUPPLY After redevelopment a new 97 space parking garage will be constructed on the site. III. PARKING DEMAND Ambiance on White Sands will be a beachfront hotel containing few amenities that would generate additional need for parking vehicles. The facility will include 90 hotel rooms, and an internal restaurant/bar. There will be no banquet facilities and a small meeting room will be limited to hotel guests. The proposed operator provided data regarding expected staffmg, occupancy, hours of operation of accessory uses, and mode of travel of staff and hotel guests. The parking demand assumptions for hotel staff; hotel guests, and restaurant/bar staff are summarized in Table 1. Hotel staff will operate on three shifts per day. Shift A (7 AM -3PM would employ 9 staff members under normal operations and 10 staff under full occupancy. Shift B (3 PM —11 PM) would employ 7 staff members under normal operations and 8 staff under full occupancy. Shift C (11 PM -7 AM) would employ only 2 staff members year round. The restaurant/bar will be limited in service and have three (3) additional staff members. The restaurant would serve breakfast and lunch operating between 7 AM — 2 PM. The bar would be open between 11 AM — 11 PM. Based on expected employee travel patterns and information provided by the City of Clearwater approximately 80% of the employees will require a parking space since some employees would travel by bus, trolley, and bicycle. OR1GiNA RECENED __1 10 2009 1 Chi 1( Of CLE�16Pa: AVALON ST KENDALL ST ROCKAIST d AMBL 110 H H w PROJECT LOCATION ° BAY ESPLANADE BAYMONT ST N C c O a PROJECT LOCATION — Ambiance on White Sands PROJECT NO: 08 -072 Gulf Coast Consulting, Inc. DATE: FIGURE:. "'- Land Development Consulting 1 1 /2008 DRAWN BY: G.J.S. Mi 0 ix °^ �'O LL O a PROJECT LOCATION — Ambiance on White Sands PROJECT NO: 08 -072 Gulf Coast Consulting, Inc. DATE: FIGURE:. "'- Land Development Consulting 1 1 /2008 DRAWN BY: G.J.S. IV. 0 r During normal occupancy periods 70% of the hotel rooms are expected to be occupied which translates to 63 rooms. During full occupancy all 90 rooms would be used. Based on expected travel patterns approximately 70% of the hotel guests would require a parking space for a car, whereas the remaining 30% would arrive by others modes of travel such as taxicab, or limousine service. A. NORMAL OCCUPANCY An analysis was conducted by time -of -day to determine the total number of parking spaces needed for normal occupancy conditions with no banquet. Table 2 summarizes the parking demand for this condition as ranging between 46 and 60 parking spaces. B. FULL OCCUPANCY An analysis was conducted by time -of -day to determine the total number of parking spaces needed for full occupancy conditions. Table 3 summarizes the parking demand for this condition as ranging between 65 and 81 parking spaces. COMPARION OF SUPPLY AND DEMAND A comparison was made to determine whether the calculated parking demand can be reasonably met with the proposed number of spaces to be provided on -site. During periods of normal occupancy the 60 space demand represents 62% of the proposed parking supply. During periods of full occupancy the 81 space demand represents 84% of the proposed parking supply. As such adequate parking will be provided for the hotel operations. This analysis was conducted based upon reasonable assumptions regarding the parking characteristics of hotel staff and guests. The Ambiance on White Sands will have limited ancillary services and functions and therefore the parking demand would be reduced as compared to convention/banquet hotels. This analysis demonstrates hotel operations can easily be accommodated with the proposed 97 on -site parking spaces. 2 ORiGlML RECEDED p' 0 2009 CHY ►vf; TABLE 1 - AMBIANCE ON WHITE SANDS - PARKING DEMAND CALCULATIONS NORMAL OCCUPANCY (70 %) FULL OCCUPANCY SPACES REQUIRED SPACES REQUIRED FUNCTION VARIABLE NUMBER PERSOWROOM SPACES NUMBER PERSON /ROOM SPACES HOTEL STAFF SHIFT A 7 AM -3 PM EMPLOYEES 9 80% USE CAR 1 7 10 80% USE CAR 8 HOTEL STAFF SHIFT B 3 PM - 11 PM EMPLOYEES 7 80% USE CAR 6 8 80% USE CAR 7 HOTEL STAFF SHIFT C 11 PM -7AM EMPLOYEES 2 80% USE CAR 2 2 80% USE CAR 2 HOTEL GUESTS 90 ROOMS 70% ROOMS 63 70% USE CAR 44 90 70% USE CAR 63 RESTAURANTIBAR EMPLOYEES 3 80% USE CAR 3 3 80% USE CAR 3 ASSUMPTIONS: NORMAL OCCUPANCY IS 70% WITH 70% HOTEL GUESTS USING CAR, OTHER 30% ARRIVE BY TAXI, LIMO) EMPLOYEE PARKING IS LIMITED TO 80% OF EMPLOYEES USING A CAR BASED ON CLEARWATER EXPECTATIONS THERE ARE NO BANQUET FACILITIES, SMALL MEETING ROOM FOR HOTEL GUESTS ONLY ON SITE RESTAURANT OPEN 7 AM - 2 PM, BAR OPEN 11 AM -11 -PM • TABLE 2 - NORMAL OCCUPANCY - TIME OF DAY PARKING DEMAND HOTEL STAFF EMPLOYEES HOTEL RESTAURANT TOTAL TIME PERIOD SHIFT A SHIFT B SHIFT C GUESTS BAR STAFF DEMAND 12 MID -1 AM 2 44 46 1 AM - 2 AM 2 44 46 2AM -3AM 2 44 46 3AM -4AM 2 44 46 4AM -5AM 2 44 46 5 AM - 6 AM 2 44 46 6AM -7AM 7 2 44 53 7AM -8AM 7 2 44 3 56 8AM -9AM 7 44 3 54 9AM - 10 AM 7 44 3 54 10 AM - 11 AM 7 44 3 54 11 AM - 12 NOON 7 44 3 54 12 NOON - 1 PM 7 44 3 54 1 PM -2 PM 7 44 3 54 2PM -3PM 7 6 44 3 60 3 PM - 4 PM 7 6 44 3 60 4 PM - 5 PM 6 44 3 53 5 PM - 6 PM 6 44 3 53 6PM -7 PM 6 44 3 53 7 PM -8 PM 6 44 3 53 8PM -9 PM 6 44 3 53 9PM -10 PM 6 44 3 53 10 PM - 11 PM 6 2 44 3 55 11 PM -12 MID 6 2 44 3 55 ORRIGIN& RjcENE® Prg 102009 PJANK G&NAOMPUT CM T Of d WW AVt X • TABLE 3 - FULL OCCUPANCY - TIME OF DAY PARKING DEMAND 6 HOTEL STAFF EMPLOYEES HOTEL RESTAURANT TOTAL TIME PERIOD SHIFT A SHIFT B SHIFT C GUESTS BAR STAFF DEMAND 12 MID -1 AM 2 63 65 1 AM - 2 AM 2 63 65 2 AM - 3 AM 2 63 65 3 AM - 4 AM 2 63 65 4 AM - 5 AM 2 63 65 5 AM - 6 AM 2 63 65 6AM -7AM 8 2 63 73 7AM - 8 AM 8 2 63 3 76 8AM -9AM 8 63 3 74 9 AM - 10 AM 8 63 3 74 10 AM - 11 AM 8 63 3 74 11 AM - 12 NOON 8 63 3 74 12 NOON - 1 PM 8 63 3 74 1 PM - 2 PM 8 63 3 74 2PM -3 PM 8 7 63 3 81 3 PM -4 PM 8 7 63 3 81 4 PM - 5 PM 7 63 3 73 5 PM - 6 PM 7 63 3 73 6 PM - 7 PM 7 63 3 73 7 PM -8 PM 7 63 3 73 8 PM - 9 PM 7 63 3 73 9PM -10 PM 7 63 3 73 10 PM - 11 PM 7 2 63 3 75 11 PM - 12 MID 7 2 63 3 75 oRl(;N RECEIVED m7q 1 O 2009 CITY OF CL WAI Property Appraiser General Information: 05/29/15/16362/007 /0050 Car* Pagel of 2 0 Interactive Map of this Back to Query New T ,Collector Question/Comment about this parcel Results Search Information parcel 05/29/15/16362/007 /0050 Data Current as of December 07, 2008 [ 1:02 pm Monday December 8] Vacant Property Owner, Address, and Sales Print Propedy_Use: 0 E CLEARWATER BEACH REV BLK 7, N 63.5FT OF LOT 5 2008 Exemptions Homestead: No Use: 0% Ownership: 0% Tax Exempt: 0% Government: No Institutional: No Agricultural: $0 Historic: $0 2008 Value 2008 Tax Information Comparable Sales Value:: $0 Tax District: CW Just/Market Value: $376,200 Millage: 20.3578 Assessed Value/ SOH Cap. $376,200 Non Ad Valorem Assessments: $.00 History Taxable Value:. $376,200 Taxes: $7,658.61 A significant taxable value increase may Taxes without Save - Our - Homes cap: $7,658.61 occur when sold. Click here for details. Taxes without any exemptions: $7,658.61 Owner/Mailing Property Address Sale Date Book/Page Price Q/U V/I - Address 12/2004 13994/1448 $1,400,000 U I PANORAMA ON 3/2004 13415/2092 $1,050,000 U I CLEARWATER BEACH LLC 10/2002 12273 / 2235 $530,000 Q I 483 MANDALAY AVE 1971 3680/687 $8,000 U I STE 209 CLEARWATER FL Plat Year Plat Book/Page(s) 33767 -2035 1925 0111005 Parcel Information Book/Page: Land Use: Vacant 13994/1448 Commercial (10). Census Tract: 260.02 Land Information Seawall: Frontage: None View: Water Land Use Land Size Unit Value Units Method Vacant Commercial(10) 50 x 64 150.00 3,175.00 S http:// www. pcpao.org/general_vadet.php ?pn= 1529051636200700500 12/8/2008 Property Appraiser General Information: 05/29/15/16362/007 /0060 Car* Page 1 of 2 _I..._n..teracti,ve Map,. .of this, Back to:.__Q.uery New Tax Collector. QuestionlComment about this. parcel Results Search Information ,parcel 05/29/15/16362/007 /0060 z Data Current as of December 07, 2008 [ 1:02 pm Monday December g] Vacant Property Owner, Address, and Sales Print Proerty.Use: 0 CLEARWATER BEACH REV BLK 7, LOT 6 2008 Exemptions. Homestead: No Use: 0% Ownership: 0% Tax Exempt: 0% Government: No Institutional: No Agricultural: $0 Historic: $0 2008 Value. 2008 Tax Information Comparable Sales Value:: $0 Tax District: CW Just/Market Value: $515,500 Millage: 20.3578 Assessed Value/ SOH Cap: $515,500 Non Ad Valorem Assessments: $.00 History Taxable Value: $515,500 Taxes: $10,494.40 A significant taxable value increase may Taxes without Save -Our -Homes cap: $10,494.40 , occur when sold. Click here for details. Taxes without any exemptions: $10,494.40 Owner/Mailing Property Address Sale Date Book/Page Price O/U V/I Address 12/2004 13994/1449 $70000 U I PANORAMA ON 4/1997 9663/1360 $172,000 Q I CLEARWATER BEACH LLC 1967 2731/663 $1,100 U I 483 MANDALAY AVE Plat Year Plat Book/Page(s) STE 209 CLEARWATER FL 1925 0111005 33767 -2035 Parcel Information Book/Page: Land Use: Vacant 13994/1449 Residential (00) Census Tract: 260.02 Land Information Seawall: Frontage: Gulf View: Land Use Land Size Unit Value Units Method Vacant Residential(00) 50 x 87 150.00 4,350.00 S http: / /www.pcpao.org/general _ vadet.php ?pn= 1529051636200700600 12/8/2008 Property Appraiser General Information: 05/29/15/16362/007/0070 Carlo Page 1 of 2 0 InterInteractive. Map _of this Back to Oueiv New Tax Collector Question /Comment about this active ..... .......... Back . ..... I I ...... -1.11-1. .. . ..... . . Search . . ...... .... -..- -.- -- .... . .... . .. - ..... . ... . . .. . ......... . . . .... . ....... about . .......... . . ........ . .. . parcel Results Search information parcel �— 05/29/15/16362/007/0070 Data Current as of December 07, 2008 [1:03 pm Monday December 8] Vacant Property Owner, Address, and Sales Print PrQpgq -y-�U.se: 0 F CLEARWATER BEACH REV BLK 7, W 1/2 OF LOT 7 2008 Exemptions Homestead: No Use: 0% Ownership: 0% Tax Exempt: 0% Government:. No Institutional: No Agricultural: $0 Historic:. $0 2008 Value 2008 Tax Information Comparable Sales Value:: $0 Tax District: CW Just/Market Value: $257,700 Millage: 20.3578 Assessed Value/ SOH Cap: $257,700 Non Ad. Valorem Assessments: $.00 History Taxable Value: $257,700 Taxes: $5,246.21 A significant taxable value increase may Taxes without Save-Our-Homes cap: $5,246.21 occur when sold. Click here for details. Taxes without any exemptions: $5,246.21 Owner/Mailing Property Address Sale Date Book/Page Price O/U V/1 Address 1/2005 14080/1014 $19600,000 M I PANORAMA ON 12/1998 10365/380 $959000 Q I CLEARWATER BEACH LLC Plat Year Plat Book/Page(s) 483 MANDALAY AVE 1925 0111005 STE 209 CLEARWATER FL 33767-2035 Parcel Information Book/Page: Land Use: Vacant 14080/1014 Residential (00) Census Tract: 260.02 Land Information Seawall: Frontage: Gulf View: Land Use Land Size Unit Value Units Method Vacant Residential(O0) 25 x 87 150.00 2,175.00 S http: / /www.pcpao.org/general _ vadet.php ?pn= 1529051636200700700 12/8/2008 Property Appraiser General Information: 05/29/15/16362/007 /0071 Carl* Pagel of 2 0 Interactive Map of this Back to Query New Tax Collector Question/Comment about this parcel R...esults. Search Information parcel 05/29/15/16362/007 /0071 Data Current as of December 079 2008 [ 1:03 pm Monday December 8] Vacant Property Owner, Address, and Sales Print PMerty Use: 0 P CLEARWATER BEACH REV BLK 7, E 1/2 OF LOT 7 2008 Exemptions Homestead: No Use: 0 % Ownership: 0% Tax Exempt: 0% Government: No Institutional: No Agricultural: $0 Historic: $0 2008 Value 2008 Tax Information Comparable Sales Value:: $0 Tax District: CW Just/Market Value: $257,700 Millage: 20.3578 Assessed Value/ SOH Cap: $257,700 Non Ad Valorem Assessments: $.00 History Taxable Value: $257,700 Taxes: $5,246.21 A significant taxable value increase may Taxes without Save - Our -Homes cap: $5,246.21 occur when sold. Click here for details. Taxes without any exemptions: $5,246.21 Owner/Mailing Property Address Sale Date Book/Page Price Q/U V /1. Address 1/2005 14080/1014 $1;600,000 M I PANORAMA ON 1975 4313/728 $15,000 Q I CLEARWATER BEACH LLC Plat Year Plat Book/Page(s) 483 MANDALAY AVE 1925 0111005 STE 209. CLEARWATER FL 33767 -2035 Parcel Information Book/Page: Land Use: Vacant 14080/1014 Residential (00) Census Tract: 260.02 Seawall: Land Use Vacant Residential(00) Land Information Frontage: Gulf Land Size 25 x 87 Unit Value 150.00 View: Units Method 2,175.00 S http: / /www.pcpao.org/general _ vadet.php ?pn= 1529051636200700710 12/8/2008 Property Appraiser General Information: 05/29/15/16362/007 /0080 Carf Pagel of 2 Interactive Map of this Back to Query_ New Tax Collector _ uestion/Comment about this Parcel Results. S-e_arch Information parcel 05/29/15/16362/007 /0080 Data Current as of December 07, 2008 [ 1:04 pm Monday December 8] Vacant Property Owner, Address, and Sales Print ' . ... Pro ert Use: 0 p y -- CLEARWATER BEACH REV BLK 7, LOT 8 LESS E 25FT OF THE N 55FT 2008 Exemptions Homestead:. No Use: 0% Ownership: 0% Tax Exempt: 0% Government: No Institutional: No Agricultural: $0 Historic: $0 2008 Value 2008 Tax Information Comparable Sales Value:: $0 Tax District: CW Just /Market Value: $352,500 Millage: 20.3578 Assessed Value/ SOH C_ ap_,_$352,500 Non Ad Valorem Assessments: $.00 History Taxable Value: $352,500 Taxes: $7,176.12 A significant taxable value increase may Taxes without Save - Our -Homes cap: $7,176.12 occur when sold. Click here for details. Taxes without any exemptions: $7,176.12 Owner/Mailing Property. Address Sale Date Book/Page Price AUU V/I _ Address 1/2005 14080/1014 $1,600,000 M I PANORAMA ON 1978 4763/297 $25,000 U I CLEARWATER BEACH LLC Plat Year Plat Book/Page(s) 483 MANDALAY AVE 1925 0111005 STE 209 CLEARWATER FL 33767 -2035 Parcel Information Book/Page: Land Use: Vacant 14080/1014 Residential (00) Census Tract:. 260.02 Land Information Seawall: Frontage: Gulf View: Land Use Land Size Unit Value Units Method Vacant Residentialj00) 150.00 2,975.00 S http: / /www.pcpao.org/ general_ vadet .php ?pn = 1529051636200700800 12/8/2008 Property Appraiser General Information: 05/29/15/16362/007 /0081 Car#& Pagel of 2 Interactive Map of this Back to uei _ New Tax Collector Question /Comment about this parcel Results Search Information parce_1 05/29/15/16362/007/0081 Data Current as of December 07, 2008 [1:04 pm Monday December 8] Vacant Property Owner, Address, and Sales Print Property_ Use: 0 CLEARWATER BEACH REV BLK 7, E 25FT OF N 55FT OF LOT. 8 2008 Exemptions Homestead: No Use: 0% Ownership: 0% Tax Exempt: 0% Government:. No Institutional: No Agricultural: $0 Historic: $0 2008 Value 2008 Tax Information Comparable Sales Value:: $0 Tax District: CW Just/Market Value:. $162,900 Millage: 20.3578 Assessed Value/ SOH Cap: $162,900 Non Ad Valorem Assessments: $.00 History Taxable Value: $162,900 Taxes: $3,316.29 A significant taxable value increase may Taxes without Save - Our -Homes cap: $3,316.29 occur when sold. Click here. for details. Taxes without any exemptions: $3,316.29 Owner/Mailin Property Address Sale Date Book/Page Price Q/U VII . Address 1/2005 14080/1014 $1,600,000 M I PANORAMA ON 3/1996 9279/721 $66,900 Q I CLEARWATER BEACH LLC 1969 3093/287 $11,000 U I 483. MANDALAY AVE Plat Year Plat Book/Page(s) STE 209. CLEARWATER FL 1925 0111005 33767 -2035 Parcel Information Book/Page: Land Use: Vacant 14080/1014 Residential (00) Census Tract:. 260.02 Land Information Seawall: Frontage: Gulf View: Land Use Land Size Unit Value Units Method Vacant Residential(00) 25 x 55 150.00 1,375.00 S http:// www. pcpao.org/general_vadet.php ?pn= 1529051636200700810 12/8/2008 Property Appraiser General Information: 05/29/15/16362/007/0140 Car Page I of 2 0 Interactive MaD of t1lis Back to Query New. Tax Collector Question/Comment about this Parcel Results Searcb Information Parcel 05/29/15/16362/007/0140 Data Current as of December 07, 2008 L [1:04 pm Monday December 8] Vacant Property Owner, Address, and Sales Print Property. Use: 0 CLEARWATER BEACH REV BLK 7, LOT 14 & S 23.5FT OF LOT 5 2008 Exemptions Homestead: No Use: 0% Ownership: 0% Tax Exempt: 0% Government: No Institutional: No Agricultural: $0 Historic:. $0 2008 Value 2008 Tax Information Comparable Sales Value:: $0 Tax District: CW Just/Market Value: $660,600 Millage: 20.3578 Assessed Value/ SOH Cap: $660,600 Non Ad Valorem Assessments: $.00 MOM Taxable Value: $660,600 Taxes: $13,448.30 A significant taxable value increase may Taxes without Save-Our-Homes cap: $13,448.30 occur when sold. Click here for details. Taxes without any exemptions: $13,448.30 Owner/Mailing Property Address Sale Date Book/Page Price Qx V/1 Address 12/2004 13994/1450 $2,145,000 U I PANORAMA ON 1969 3199/210 $55,000 U I CLEARWATER BEACH LLC Plat Year Plat Book/Page(s) 483 MANDALAY AVE 1925 0111005 STE 209 CLEARWATER FL 33767-2035 Parcel Information Book/Page: Land Use: Vacant 13994/1450 Commercial (10) Census Tract: 260.02 Land Information Seawall: Frontage: None View: Land Use Land Size Unit Value Units Method Vacant Commercial(10) 50x 111 150.00 5,575.00 S http://www.pcpao.org/general—vadet.php?pn=l 529051636200701400 12/8/2008 Property Appraiser General Information: 05/29/15/16362/007 /0130 Carl* Interactive Mar) of this Compa..rable_S.ales. Back to_ Query New Tax Collector parcel Lis...ti_ng Results Search. Information Page 1 of 4 Question/Comment about,th..is parcel 05/29/15/16362/007 /0130 Building 1 k ._ Data Current as of December 07, Portability Calculator 2008 [ 1:05 pm Monday December 8] Residential Property Owner Address, and Sales Print Duplex/Triplex ProRertv Use.: 220 Living Units: 2 CLEARWATER BEACH REV BLK 7, LOT 13 2008 Exemptions Homestead: No Use: 0% Ownership: 0% Tax Exempt: 0% Government: No Institutional: No Agricultural: $0 Historic: $0 2008 Value 2008 Tax Information Comparable Sales Value:. $603,000 Tax District: CW F.S. 553.844 Just /Market Value: $410,200 Millage: 20.3578 Assessed Value/ SOH Cap: $410,200 Non Ad Valorem Assessments: $.00 History . Taxable Value: $410,200 Taxes: $8,350.75 A significant taxable value increase may Taxes without Save - Our -Homes cap: $8,350.75 occur when sold. Click here for details. Taxes without any exemptions: $8,350.75 Owner/Mailing Property Address Sale Date Book/Page Price Q/U WI Address No Recent Sales SAMARKOS, EVANGELINE P Plat Year Plat Book/Page(s) REVOCABLE TRUST 1925 0111005 SAMARKOS, MICHAEL A HARKEY, VICTORIA 20 KENDALL ST C/O SAMARKOS, EVANGELINE P THE 106 MIDWAY IS. CLEARWATER FL 33767 -2313 Parcel Information Book/Page: Land Use: Multi-Family 15024/1778 - Less ... (08y Census Tract: 260.02 http: / /www.pcpao.org/general _ radet.php ?pn= 1529051636200701301 12/8/2008 Property Appraiser General Information: 05/29/15/16362/007 /0130 Caro Page 2 of 4 Land Information 11 Seawall: No Frontage: None View: ,Land Use Land Size Unit Value Units Method Multi- Family - Less than 10 units(08) 50 x 87 110.00 4,350.00 S Structural Elements Foundation: Piers Floor System: Wood Exterior Wall: Frame /Siding Roof Frame: Gable -Hip Roof Cover: Composite - Shingle 1 Story Floor Finish: Carpet/Vinyl/Asphalt/Soft Wood/Terazzo Interior Finish: Wood/Wallboard Fixtures: 6 Quality: Average Year Built: 1925 Effective Age: 45 Heating: Unit/Space/Wall/Floor Furnace Cooling: None Other Depreciation: 0 Functional Depreciation: 20 Economic Depreciation: 0 Open plot_in_New _Window View Floor: 1_, here if screen is blank PAS oaf Click http: / /www.pcpao.org/general _ radet.php ?pn= 1529051636200701301 12/8/2008 1?roperty Appraiser General Information: 05/29/15/16362/007 /0130 Carl* Page 3 of 4 Sub. Area Information Description Living Area Ft2 Gross Area Ft2 Factor Effective Ft2 Base. Area 1,163 1,163 1.00 1,163 Enclosed Porch 651 .60 391 Finished Total Living SF: 1,163 Total Gross SF: 1,814 Total Effective SF: 1,554 Residential Extra Features Description Dimensions Value/Unit Units Total NewValue Depreciated Value Year No Extra Features on Record http:// www. pcpao.org/general_radet.php ?pn= 1529051636200701301 12/8/2008 610 Frankki BMW - ",laarvvetn:', t' -13756 Pubilc Work; Administratior , 1ztn-.gin,.�f2rincj D-eparlunvent 100 S. AAyrUe Amenue, SuRe 200 - Maanuatvq NO= 33706 Flf .r I-Low-& — "'z"N T47-v-)i o, F� i E -s f - i E. r:: PAGL C1 2 / N •is warksheet is, require(! to A sukrilMd to and epproved ir',y 9!e Aulnorily HEM(Ig Airlsdictlon. !(AH,ji prior to DRO nisMing for'sny ;wcject that is trore than 3i storiss or mme Dian 30 Ut 0 huyl above Ine io✓est Firc; Dop( vehicle accesm point or for einy other prc;ect that wN rooks an Wornatil V01: Standpipe Sy stern. anidlnr Fire, Pomp before any,pevrnos for new b0ldhg co"Kxtion, bull expeumn or Is hyMpAs WE be issued by the City of Cfearwater. InfonratOn and desIn must campy wRh Qrsa Building Code, �D"pkr 2 - Re Protection ,SyRtems, FlorirJ2 Fire Prn.vcnitinn Ccde to '!!C!Ude zap..p1jc,.-)Ne NFPA Code (MFPA 1, 13, 130. SE, 13R. 14, 1,5,, 20: Z01 2..nd 1142 Annay H) and AVVWA '0-1 7 - MKIAUori, Heid 7 Psling arid N.,-@jnienancc oF Fire HyMenk. �5R5J'ffT INFORMATION Proje3i N earn e Pro i ject Addrecs: Locabon of Nfeerest Firs ..Hydrant: Y 40 Siza of kNater NANn emu" Yog Fire Fbwl-- Looped System or Dead End %fater t'-,1.ain?- 11'.tauc: psi Residual: Poo; L40 psi Flow! ENstonce of Test Gaugos Relative to Via Basle of he Poser Horizontaf jj,,Q Verticl Edevaton Hydrew Test ConAwNd by_ fil 6 UA QW-A- -11 A. A t j Ondude=ch Copy of Awal Ast I NFPA HAZ A-,9,9 f F I GATI ON;-'*-7'--'--'-*---,--" Ar,ea 41 Descripilion of Haza'rd allS6 I- NROA ------------- .......... Alfz!rh it (sago 1 of Clio,I 4 PARAAfj T FW F S Systrm T, z - 1-11.rea ..... . ..... . . . . . ....... . WiLL,4 .. . ... . .. . ..... - ----- . ........... . At to I A d6,Ww'Bj S h �.e!s if Afociumvy ota� Nemded {-"!'p 7-Irv,1 (N r' F.) is Fxjstlng System, Supply Sufficicnl io fvlleet N.F: Abc)ve'� N c) . . . . ......... CODES AND S'TANDARDS Sysfem Ap p ifc a b! e P F-, A S f a n ddard i ye p,, r itio, r, o r7 d Of h a r A p phi c 6 ble 0 a d T S o, S t 1, 1 f'- s e P C_ ct. MAM-- O 02., r-IFPA, -go C19* t4.Fp_'A_S z�zp_ox ... .......... f PrOJ-ect Includes Fire Pulrn.p, Suppry the Plump frilarmaticin- Pump Cappcity: ("hum Press"Ire, Ra.ed Pressure, r SLIM 11550% Flow: 011-"�;J*e stolm'ge TarlK ""apacity (?JI' N PREPARER SPECTIER IN�_0_P.W!�rRdW---- . . . ........ . . Company Name: �JANIES K CU IS kjoress J, n. 1{ jr-- . ......... ....... 2`77E BAYHEAD RCI. 9 6 L 33523 a5 iP. E. Scar Pagn 2 of ADDITIONAL IN }'ORMA "i {,iP'J IREi UIkED _..�__..._....... ._.........�__._ .... Crrjvld8 re f ~I:Jvi' G Icttt�ltu�rs . ••'��i C : t t by t ::t _� 1 ;iii i e l I, ...P< iC . ^S:i.WO 'Ifl {.'.:;(yt`i 11 : wti- ',O!' Supply is .'af3lz .antl to dryt�r.�;l •le ,( a;1,, tpyractrs are::,:'!,u; Cu by the Ie:,?Cnrr Ht.e iC it':e' .,„ ,a;;t ;,f 1'iiS rroieci: lh(r wator Sujlj;iy MUst be able t`i $up 1 ,ri.t ^e ee's o pit, y ra ''ire,: fir6 "� ''rtl::E r, 5f nd';irt i � %w'' itr tri - ;f <l flre pi,frnp is 4iolird, the wat_&r s:;ppl {t s 1 to r; ri r� r2 d capes i`v. (:rltY',�;ir' rn ,,S;,a n, !,n; 'd«i - �ti :'it'.1{l 'ode I- Inck,,,p Y '':L, t t)( tjiU a'U�f..: r.tf n �: is C. ..we ' �� G ?"i, ter- Fire 'r /(` I ✓ .rJ N,;, : A 1u'. N'FF -A i4, f= %jt 20 ! "11Fr'A 2, �" : a id NF'Fa 7'r,: 6v rl ox Hi', `aquirc- 2. UiJhe . }r. ri�C r irk'. 't gf1 ^+ n' U'„ F �t rf .,;. .:• v -ll:; '+ I .. _,,. h . ;? ;,,, >{ .f + be nin' 5:e -... 5::a. r, ,; c•; r,'; it 'JJii% 7 a Ili; IiJ(; I'i( $" no I P r1�- tEi;'• . ; zs e Fi -c ^n ide r;:.st J ih "1n a do l,ect i 12t1 not r.r: ~ii)e s ?�,y r^ai(, t`� . it.., .,,.,r!' ^..._r <.rtU 1:..:,, i;•y ^.r _ ..h; sid. ... 2 i.urie <;2; .� Th!S i1 r1r'ani is in +itlltic tG tl';c i':y`Mr n, that is r8r irir(i F(}r `t ^e1 lltiS':C': ;t; : +i) t':° h3i: iS :,y ^r r'it" +„ j'Q(l 3'E,r'; Oi I)iiildin�; As the hose inwS, andf r..n tha same"! S:COo rP t 1 stre'e't cS IN4 project. flrU`1i'E •� 1�anJ r r'(`.r: ;-- G t� ` i r -? : r em.e eWcl,. Ss fl," 4sS at ill @,'nt(c i c^os and Cs an1d l or. the p"an ? MI ii 3U-fG t r� . 5�I IS `C: fDG^ `' .. � ` �a RCr f?ri;'v (�e BrTd 511pVt Dtl tlE Si$@ t:lcn %N ?Et ,x';;�itll fat Ci'? �'r }'> CI "it +fi i3i$l2s 60' er1:.P'n5f`C ' vsnlcira. tr':,£J(p.S nd eurps4 fv� fro,11 -se ^,j fe-:f hAfl(in0 iDtS. Where ;+�'v!< +s 218'r (? f; tl . j• v e ; 1- o..igr;at� ^. r'� aA h Cir �` .<,I'�,, I �t !.. i. 'f .} y u(1 siand iJ't, f'.•„ c3 "i:C; ..C:: 1s ' iR@ a-d $,l< •. f.rtaVlLe _jricl show On the 6!t ,jolan 20 feet of width at, 4ha dr ve'wa;ys 0.11 ec2r.I $ICI(? Of th-s 'sl3mj, ti i °.? ? e 7r C n Department t, es +`. �r r...i4i rn. r'' Tor r.�.�..., l {. -s' ; Firn tp; rt ea r v; i . rr: . e,par merit a �r.. , s raC ay ,•J. i t ^fou:l., Y', 'I :ar G'v;_" mac; ..� ,c:;Cr'CI <..yc,;; ��:Itr, ivFF';� ? �� i. Qt,N:�. n:.. ocu4ii.c rn idwaay must Neva 24._tf9()t rIear an, "r •, ;G'. "Ortic l Cir3 il8rl :: prid, ba cgpat: c of Sii{,ip r )Ig the woioh , :'' . it =; vehic -lea iii j 1'I)41• :,.� : ✓� . 2 r1 75, 6,4 6 1 rwater FAX MESSAG CITY OF C-LEAP,`a ATER /PUBLIC UTiL,iT1E:� 1656 -C A1?C i URAS AVE. N. CLEARVIA T ER; Fl— 33766 PHONE (727) 562 =4960 1 FAX (727) 562. 963.. r s !_OCATION: -.�. FAX NUMEER- ��_%�-_ `-! a D A7rr:.. MA.RKS. ;e a, NUMBER' CP PA,CiwS OWN Ric Los A—E EN' 2 e, el 7 2 7 `5 6 f" 3 6, 1 FLOW TEST CITY OF CLEARWATER WATER DEPARTMENT FLOCATION AVA LON ST !DATE OF TEST L ISTATIC: p5( �RESIDIJAL 65 . Is[ v ;11TOT psi --44 20 --777-- - GPM //vo HYDRANT # . ......... URICI It COEFFICI-E&l PAUL 051 OE" PAGE 04 PA5E PJBLM 45 27 .5, 2 4, F RE I Y _ A FETY ,fW A w - - . Pori a R, i _ . _.. . _.. - ....................... ..... _... ....... ...... ,.... : a. P to C� 0. x Job Name AMBIANCE ON THE BEACH Building Hotel Location 20 Kendall Street Clearwater, Florida 33767 System. 1 Contract Data File Arnbian:.ce.vvxl Co:r ouier PragramS by iydratec irc. Ro le ill \Ahirdharl NA. USA 03 37 t u w a` La t 7 Ct is Lj Lj 5; r . Job Name AMBIANCE ON THE BEACH Building Hotel Location 20 Kendall Street Clearwater, Florida 33767 System. 1 Contract Data File Arnbian:.ce.vvxl Co:r ouier PragramS by iydratec irc. Ro le ill \Ahirdharl NA. USA 03 37 FIRE SAFETY INC. )ON Page 1 AMBIANCE THE BEACH Date 120108 --j ',-J; V, n i e e - I t y y 1; fx 11 F, P. 1.11 -X- Fop P-los4, Pre"3. cat Tnlo Ar� d D r oc! a ti 0. v So . . ... ............ ... Water SLJr)pIY Curve (C) FIRE SAFETY INC. Paae 2 AMBIANCE ON THE BEACH Date 120,108 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 FLOW (NA 1.85) Demand: D1 - Elevation 36.380 D2 - System Flow D2 - System Pressure -f _3 T 3 79F Hose di City) Hose Demand) D3 - System Demand 7 50 Safety tVlaryin 21-946 ornpuk M t 1 . . "I -, 0",0 I fer Programs by Flydmtec Inc, Rcu*c- 111 �-ar N I :. US ' 87 1800 m 0 Fittings Used Summary FIRE SAFETY INC. Page 4 AMBIANCE ON THE BEACH Date 120108 Fitting Legend Abbrev: game rz '1< 1 1 i+ 1'ei 2 2 3 3',!: 4 5 6 8 10 12 14 16 1 £i : =u 24 B Generic Butterfly Valve 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 10 0 12 9 10 12 19 21 0 0 0 0 0 F_ 90' Standard Elbow 2 2 2 ', 4 .5- 6 7 8 10 12 '14 18 22 27 35 40 45 50 61 G Generic Gate Valve 0 0 0 0 0 1 ] 1 1 2 2 3 4 5 6 7 c, 10 11 13 S Generic Swing Check V1v 4 5 5 7 5 11 14 16 1 9 22 27 32 45 55 65 76 87 98 109 N 30 "i 90' Flow Thru Tee 3 4 5 a 8 10 12 is 17 20 25 30 .35 50 60 .71 81 9 "i 101 121 l Generic Flow switch 2 2 2 3 4 5 6 8 10 12 ":4 18 22 27 35 40 45 50 kit • Units Surnmar1/ Diameter Units inches Length Units Feet Flow Units US Gallons per Minute Pressure Units Pounds per Square Inch Ire 0 �o .;ompu,er Proaramc by Hydratec inc_ Route. 1 11 Windharn N H ,...... ::3087' Final Calculations - Hazen -Wi-111ams FIRE SAFETY INC. Page 6 AMBIANCE ON THE BEACH Date 120108 Hyd. Qa Dia. F ttitIg Pipe Pt Pt Ref. "C" or Ftng's Pe Pv 'Xkx Notes_x., Point Qt Pf1Ft Env. Ln. Total Pf Pn 12 250.00 4.26 1E 13.167 0.540 100.238 Qa = 2 50 to 120 0.0 13.167 27.718 13 250.0 0.0151 _..... , ,._..... _.. 0.0 13.707 _ ....... 0.207 .. ...._ ..._... Vel = 5.63 „ ......._ . _ ... " 3 0.0 4.26 1E 13.167 128:910 128.183 to 120 113. 15.8 28.967 0.0 4 250.0 0.0151 0.0 157.877 2.388 Vel = 5.63 0.0 250.00 13 0. 55 5 1 K Factor= 21.88 2 500.00 4.26 1 E 13. 167 0.500 100..000 Qa = 500 to 120 0.0 13.167 27.718 3 500.0 0.0545 0.0 13.667 0.745 Vel = 11.25 3 0.0 6.357 1 E 17.603 201.080 128.463 to 120 IT 31.72 67.896 0.0 4 500.0 0.0078 1 B 12.573 268.976 2.088 Vet = 5.05 4 250.00 6.357 2E 35.205 7 5.580 130.551 to 120 0.0 35.205 0.0 5 750.0 0.0164 0.0 110.785 1.820 Vel = 7.58 5 0.0 5.295 1E 15.158 5.830 132.371 to 120 0.0 15.158 0.0 6 750.0 0.0400 0.0 20.988 0.840 Vel = 10.93 6 0.0 6.357 1E 17.603 7,500 133.211 to 120 1 B 12.573 88.014 2.599 PMPO 750.0 0.0164 1Z 17.603 95.514 1.569 Vel = 7.58 1S 40.235 0.0 750.00 137 379 K Factor = 83.99 System Demand Pressure 137 .37 9 ORIGINAL Safety Margin 21.946 Continuation Pressure 159.325 RECEIVED Pressure @ Pump Outlet 159.325 - -1 02009 Pressure From Pump Curve - 110.000 lal.ANKNG DEWmalM.4T Pressure Pump Piet 49.325 _. CITY OF CLEARWAIPER PMPI 0.0 6.357 2E 35.205 8.410 49.325 to 120 1G 3.772 76.697 0.0 7 750.0 0,0164.... 1 T 37.72 85.107 1, 399 Vel = 7.58 7 0.0 6.357 1 E 17.603 .1 5.870 50.724 to 120 0.0 17.603 0.0 8 750.0 ©.0164 0.0 33.473 0.550 Vel = 7.58 8 0.0 6.357 1 E 17.603 14.000 51.274 to 120 0.0 17.603 7.363 9 750.0 0.0164 _.. .... ...... ..__..... .._..._. .... ... ..._.... .... .... :..... 0.0 _, . ._....._.....__........ 31.603 0.519 .......... Vel = 7.58 9 0.0 6.16 1 E 20.084 8.200 59.156 to 140 0.0 20.084 0.0 10 750.0 0.0144 0.0 28.284 0.407 Vel = 8.07 C'o!rrPuter Programs by }lych ate c Ino'. Ro i e tt "'11 t.! tr�t ?n;'~.^ . " . Z . U S` � J„D87 Y Final Calculations - Hazen- `J'Jilms FIRE SAFE Y INC. Page 7 AMBIANCE O.N. THE BEACH Date 120108 Hyd. Oa Dia. Fitting Pipe Pt Pt Ref. "C" or Ft 'g's Pe Pv „v.r ;:: *.: Notes :K Point Ot Pf /Ft Eqv. `n . Total Pf Pt, 10 0.0 8.85 1 G 3.834 100.000 69.563 to 150 2E 35.786 39.620 3:101 x Fixed foss EST 750.0 0.0162 0.0 139.620 2.25' Vow 8.92 0.0 750.00 65.521 K Factor = 32.66 ORIGO ��g • 10 '��09 AR C,%y, �e Gq ;nputer Prccrar?;s by Hyd;atec.lrc. ROUte 1 1 Ni ld>>a;T N.K USA 03087 11/ !b/ ZUUb Ud: J'J /L I44bdUjb NUK 11-I: 11JE f_- NU P GL 02/04 e n r Clearwater 1=i,-e & Rescue 610 Franklin Street - Clearwater, Florida 33736 Public Works Administration -• Engineering Department 100 S. Myrtle Avenue, Suite 200 - Clearwater,, Florida 33756 _ FIRE r-LOW & HYDRANT WOF KSREET -� (Revised 03/29/2DOO) This worksheet Is required to be submitted to and approved by the Authority Having Jurisdiction (AFIJ) prior to DRC meeting for any project that is more fhan 3 stories or more than 30 feet in height above the lowest Fire Dept vehicle access point or for any other project that will require an Automatic Wet Standpipe System and /or Flre Pump before any permits for new building construction, building expansion or fire hydrants will be issued by the City of Clearwater. Information and design must comply with Florida Building Code, Chapter 9 . Fire Protection Systems, Florida Fire Prevention Code to include applicable NFPA Code (NFPA 1, 13, 13D, 13E, 13th, 14, 15, 20, 291 and 1142 Annex, H) and AWWA M -17 - Inslallafion, Field Testing and Maintenance of Fire Hydrants. FP_R0J'ff CT INFORMATION Project Narne; Project Address: Att. G E:T" GC,�Pe+d►�fL l.�q`i�,. GENERAL WATER SYSTEM IN:FORIVI''TION Location of Nearest Firc Hydrant: A!V,Oa OiN,. ST Hydrant #: .0.C7 Size of Water Main Supplying Fire Flow: (0 t 1 Looped System or Dead End Water Main? 1,00,0C a Static: psi Residual:_ S5 psi Pitot: — LL ___LT. -D psi Flow: ` (p gpm Distance of Test Gauges Relative to the Base of the Riser: Horizontal Ft, Vertical Elevation _ I F't. Hydrant Test Conducted by: Gd E°y ®-� e'a Q�►�' i�l�l �,� � ^ (Include /Attach Copy of Actual Test Shoat) NFPA HAZARD CLASSIFICATION Area #€ Classification Description of Hazard Protected (Commodlly Uoscrlptlon, Sloragc Height and Arrangemcnl, If applicable): Affich Additional S17r3ets if Neressary ORIGINAL MCE"D Pago 1 or 3 0 2 2008 F DIPA. wwwr CffY OF CttARWR Iuzm/zmou mu: d1i /z/ovud UJb wux/*SIuL. PAGE 83/84 DESIGN . . -- � ��6�a Hooe/oon� Hos� /g�n� Area # Syobn/� Type A Den �pnx7V .~.� ' uuc//u� -� -�.=��-_-_-_'_ _-~=�~~�____-_- ____-"-_--_-'___' _-- _--__. - ......... ___-� x/bqvxAudiflon@lJooe(S ifNnUCouNY Total Needed Firp, Flow (NPF) ' . Is ExIstIng System Supp|ySuffink»nt to Meet N FF Above? No . Yp,,,:,, FcODE§ AND STANDARDS $yubemCumponont ApplfcmbleNFP\4 Standard / Year Edition and Other Applicable Code!o at, Stato/s� oic�'Z RA � A itamAdditivowSheets ff/Vecexsmry IfProject Includes Piro Pump, Supply the Fol|uw|ng: 5ioo Pump Information: Pump Capacity:_ gprr, Rated Pressure, psi On-Site Storage Tank Capacity CkurnPrmoauro: i FORE-PARER / SPECIFIER INFORMATION-— Proparer Name-. Company Name-, R-TIS #37 2 Mailing Address: ES M x 352- 196 305 W21 AYHEAD RD- State: 29775 BA DADECITY FL 31123 � MCF.MD n0�� 0� "p �w�w p,)ov z n/o � "=~--- - CRY Of C1��VVW t k LU/ "Jiud U b; J'_1 (Ztc1qbbUdb NU1'IH51.JE ENU 4 LADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUIPED . ..... ...... . ..... Fire Prevention Iterns to be Addressed Prior to DRC. Approval; 1 w= aicul'�tliO,AVI Water Study by a FIIRI PROTECTION ENGINEER Io aSGUro an adequate 'Nn(Gr Supply is available and to datormine if any L1Pgr@d(,,s are required by the developer due to the impact of this project. Tho wator supply must be able 'to support the needs of any required fire sprinkler, standpipe and/or (ire pump. If a fire pump is required, the water SUPPIY must be able to supply 150% of its rated capacity. Compliance with the 2004 Florida Fire Prevention Code to Include NrP'A 13, NFPA 14, NFPA 20, NFPA 291, and NFPA 111? (Annex H) Is required. 2. When an rDC is required, It ,half be @ minimum of 15 feet from building and shall have a fire hydrant within 40 feet. This hydrant shall not be located an the same main as the Fire Sprinkler and must be on the supply side of a double detector chock valve. This hydrant is in addition to the: hydrant that Is requirrd'For firefIgh(ing purposes that, is to be within 300 feet of building, as the hose lays, and on the sarne side of the street as the project. 3. Provide and ;how on the plan a minimum 30-foot turning radius for emergency vehicle ingress and egress at all entrances and exits. 4 Provide and show on the site plan 24 feet of width at driveways / drive aisles for emergency vphlc(e Ingress and egress for front and rear p . irking lots. Where driveways are split by an island with one-way traffic, each side of the island shall provide arid show an the site plan 20 feet of width at the driveways on each side of the ISI ind. 5. Provide a Fire Department access roadway (with turn - around, Y, T or cul-do ,sac) In accordance with NFPA 1, A Fire Department access roadway must have 24-foot clear width and 14-foot vertical clearance, and be capaolo of supporting the waight of Fire Department vehicles (80,00010s). Page 3 of 3 0MINAL I&CElVED 'c 0? I , , , 2008 pLANt,%* 9V-#MM_R4T , W� -C. Vly OF CLtARWXE`X 12101/2008 11:54 7274468036 NORTHSIDE ENG CS 12/01/2008 3.1:dS 7275*1 PUBLIC UTILITT* ""Urwater FAX MESSAGE CITY OF CLEARWATER / PUBLIC UTILITI 1650-C ARCTURAS AVE. N.. CLEARWATER, FL. 33765 PHONE (727) 5E32-4960 FAX (727) 562-4963,. TO: Vo LOCATION, FAX NUMBER: FROM; fooD a 13-1- DATE: 12 1 1 10P, I I REMARKS: F I T-if t, r NUMBER OF PAGES (INCLUDING THIS COVC-R PAGE) TIME: 127. PAGE 02/08 PAGE 01 ORIGNAL M i ED ? 2008 12/01/2008 11:54 12/01/2008 1.1;45 72744680 36 7275601 NORTHSIDE ENG CS PUBLIC UTIL1TIt� PAGE 05/08 PAGE 04 6+1`9 T %J AL Q G 2008 V 6�O \ 4�Y Y c•2-- Ar; FLOW TEST CITY OF CLEARWATER WATER DEPARTMENT L a ST. DATE OF TEST / I STATIC; 7� P'SI L IDUAL,� PSI IRITOT PSI ��1� (7 ,Q 20 FLAW D GPM IHYDRANT# Z O [GRID # MISC: C®EF F CC CUSTOMER REQUESTING TEST ORIGIN 6+1`9 T %J AL Q G 2008 V 6�O \ 4�Y Y c•2-- Ar; 12/01/2003 11:54 7274468036 12/01/2008 11:45 727541 N r 7 J d �.tJ'14/ NdW O � CL+ � I IJJ O LJ C C9 � HOV39 N tp 0 Ff NORTHSIDE ENG ICS PUBLIC UTILITIA BAY to I I CY F Flu S N C9 6 IE 'Na lJ I LGSN10c! I Fl. L �I PAGE 08/03 PAGE 11 ur 0 3 a V3 L LJ i pdcH z oz oRIGINAL C'D ,. 0 2 2000 CVTy OF CLtAR M � CO Y oRIGINAL C'D ,. 0 2 2000 CVTy OF CLtAR M 0 0 FIRE =SAFETY! A SERA= ICE CONWA NY James M. Curtis, P.E. Florida Registration # 37912: 29775 DAYHEAD ROAD DADE CITY, FL 33523 (8Q) 299 -7211 - FAY,. (352) M8 -1136 FIRE SAFETY INC. design @firesafety - inc.com P.O. BOX 17371 CLEARWATER, FL 33762 727 - 523 -1843 Job Name AMBIANCE ON THE BEACH Building Hotel Location 20 Kendall Street Clearwater, Florida 33767 System 1 Contract Data File Ambiance.wx1 Computer Programs by Hydratec Inc. Route 111 Ch uY tl: X �< W e cr) ® LO tr3 ® co d WLL Q �-• m� L0 UJI rn< �C) ORIGINAL Rt/EQ :> G 2 2600 PLAM DEIPAMP41 Cp OF W-ARWX Windham N.H. USA 03087 FIRE SAFETY INC. -- Page 1 ' AMBIANCE ON THE BEACH Date 120108 HYDRAULIC DESIGN INFORMATION SHEET Name - Ambiance no the Beach Date - 12-1-08 Location - 20 Kendall Street Clearwater, Florida 33767 Building - Hotel System 0n. - I Contractor - mocthaide Engineering Contract mo. - Calculated By - Byron Scott Drawing mo. - n/a Occupancy - Light Hazard S (x)mrPa 14 Number of Standpipes ( )l <x>2 ( )3 ( )4 ( > Y < )Other S ( )Specific Ruling Made by Date T' E Flow '��rop-��['��t- --------'---- 5-0-0- Gpm System Type M Pres. at Top Most Outlet - 100 Psi (x) Wet < } Dry Flow For Ea. Additional Standpipe - 250 8pm D Total Additional Flow - 250 Spm E Elevation at Highest Outlet - 84' . Feet S Hose valve Connection ( )I 112'' (X)2 1/2" z Class Service <x>z ( >zz G Note: N Calculation GPm Required 750 Psi Required 43 At Test Summary C-Factor Used: Overhead 120 Underground 150 .... ..... ------ _- W Water Flow Test: Pump Data: Tank or Reservoir: * Date of Tent - 12/01/08 Cap. T Time of Test - o/a Rated Cap. 750 Elev. E Static (Psi) - 74 @ Psi llO R Residual (Psi) - 55 Elev. I41-0 well Flow (Gpm) - 1160 Proof Flow Gpm S Elevation - 2 U P Location: Avalon Street - Hydrant If20 - see attached map P L Source of information: City of Clearwater Water DepoctmeoL Y ^ / ^ �~� p9 nC�0 " 1100 CITY OF CLEARMWEN Water Supply Curve (C) FIRE SAFETY INC. AMBIANCE ON THE BEACH Page 2 Date 120108 City Water Supply: Pu Data: Demand: C1 - Static Pressure 74 P1 -Pump Churn Pressure 132 D1 - Elevation 36.380 mpp C2 - Residual Pressure: 55 P2 - Pump Rated Pressure 110 D2 - System Flow C2 - Residual Flow 1160 P2 - Pump Rated Flow 750 D2 - S stem Pressure T3T.37T P3 - Pump Pressure @ Max Flow 71.5 Hose Adj City ) City Water AdJ*Justed to Pump Inlet P3 - Pump Max Flow 1125 Hose Demand) /bU for Pf - Elev - Hose Flow City Residual Flow @ 0 = 2419.00 D3 - System Demand :750 Al - Adjusted Static: 62.936 City Residual Flow a) 20 = 2040.18 Safety Margin 21.946 A2 - Adj Resid 49.325 750 City Water @ 150% of Pump = 56.05 A3 - Adj Resid 34.118 81125 210 Al P P1 196 182 P 168 + + R 154 E 140 S126 D D3 S112 U 98 R 84 C C1 E 70 2 56 Al 42 D1 28 D 14 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 ORIGINAL FLOW (N ^ 1.85) FD 02 2008 CITY OF CLtAMQA -, °E'; Computer Programs by Hydratec Inc. Route 111 Windham N.H. USA 03087 • • Flow Diagram FIRE SAFETY-INC. Page 3 AMBIANCE ON THE BEACH Date 120108 250 12 <- 13 <- 4 250 500 750 750 2 <- 3 < 4 <_ 5 <- 6 <- PMPO 500 750 750 750 750 PMP!- 7 <- 8 <- 9 <- 10 F TEST 750 750 Computer Programs by Hydratec Inc. Route 111 Windham N.H. USA 03087 c d U Q p �U a Computer Programs by Hydratec Inc. Route 111 Windham N.H. USA 03087 Fittings Used Summary FIRE SAFETY INC. Page 4 AMBIANCE ON THE BEACH Date 120108 Fitting Legend Abbrev, Name '/2 '/4 1 1'/4 1' /z 2 2'/2 3 3' /z 4 5 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 24 B Generic Butterfly Valve 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 10 0 12 9 10 12 19 21 0 0 0 0 0 E 90' Standard Elbow 2 2 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 10 12 14 18 22 27 35 40 45 50 61 G Generic Gate Valve 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 2 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 10 11 13 S Generic Swing Check Vlv 4 5 5 7 9 11 14 16 19 22 27 32 45 55 65 76 87 98 109 130 T 90' Flow Thru Tee 3 4 5 6 8 10 12 15 17 20 25 30 35 50 60 71 81 91 101 121 Z Generic Flow Switch 2 2 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 10 12 14 18 22 27 35 40 45 50 61 Units Summary Diameter Units Length Units Flow Units Pressure Units ORIGINAL t- C;-;KD 2008 PLANINMG CITY OF CL:AR %4A X-4,',,) Inches Feet US Gallons per Minute Pounds per Square Inch Computer Programs by Hydratec Inc: Route 111 Windham N.H. USA 03087 • • Pressure / Flow Summary - ST ARD FIRE SAFETY INC. Page 5 AMBIANCE ON THE BEACH Date 120108 Node Elevation K -Fact Pt Pn Flow Density Area Press No. Actual Actual Req. 12 84.0 100.24 na 250.0 13 20.0 128.16 na 2 84.0 100.0 na 500.0 3 20.0 128.46 na 4 20.0 130.55 na 5 20.0 132.37 na 6 20.0 133.21 na PMPO 14.0 137.38 na PMPI 14.0 49.33 na 7 14.0 50.72 na 8 14.0 51.27 na 9 -3.0 59.16 na 10 -3.0 59.56 na TEST 0.0 65.52 na The maximum velocity is 11.25 and it occurs in the pipe between nodes 2 and 3 co •. 2 y QD ® Lf C) Computer Programs by Hydratec Inc. Route 111 Windham N.H. USA 03087 Final Calculations - Hazen - Wills FIRE SAFETY INC. Page 6 AMBIANCE ON THE BEACH Date 120108 Hyd. Qa Dia. Fitting Pipe Pt Pt Ref. "C" or Ftng's Pe Pv * * * * * ** Notes Point Qt Pf /Ft Eqv. Ln. Total Pf Pn 12 250.00 4.26 1 E 13.167 0.540 100.238 Qa = 250 to 120 0.0 13.167 27.718 13 250.0 0.0151 0.0 13.707 0.207 Vel = 5.63 13 0.0 4.26 1 E 13.167 128.910 128.163 to 120 1 B 15.8 28.967 0.0 4 250.0 0.0151 0.0 157.877 2.388 Vel = 5.63 0.0 250.00 130.551 K Factor = 21.88 2 500.00 4.26 1 E 13.167 0.500 100.000 Qa = 500 to 120 0.0 13.167 27.718 3 500.0 0.0545 0.0 13.667 0.745 Vel = 11.25 3 0.0 6.357 1 E 17.603 201.080 128.463 to 120 1 T 37.72 67.896 0.0 4 500.0 0.0078 1 B 12.573 268.976 2.088 Vel = 5.05 4 250.00 6.357 2E 35.205 75.580 130.551 to 120 0.0 35.205 0.0 5 750.0 0.0164 0.0 110.785 1.820 Vel = 7.58 5 0.0 5.295 1 E 15.158 5.830 132.371 to 120 0.0 15.158 0.0 6 750.0 0.0400 0.0 20.988 0.840 Vel = 10.93 6 0.0 6.357 1 E 17.603 7.500 133.211 to 120 1 B 12.573 88.014. 2.599 PMPO 750.0 0.0164 1Z 17.603 95.514 1.569 Vel = 7.58 1S 40.235 0.0 750.00 137.379 K Factor= 63.99 System Demand Pressure 137.379 Safety Margin 21.946 Continuation Pressure 159.325 Pressure @ Pump Outlet 159.325 Pressure From Pump Curve - 110.000 Pressure @ Pump Inlet_ 49.325 PMPI 0.0 6.357 2E 35.205 8.410 49.325 to 120 1G 3.772 76.697 0.0 7 750.0 0.0164 1 T 37.72 85.107 1.399 Vel = 7.58 7 0.0 6.357 1 E 17.603 15.870 50.724 to 120 0.0 17.603 0.0 , 8 750.0 0.0164 0.0 33.473 0.550 Vel = 7.58 C U 8 0.0 6.357 1 E 17.603 14.000 51.274 1 "- to 120 0.0 17.603 7.363 9 750.0 0.0164 0.0 31.603 0.519 _ Vel _ 7.58 9 0.0 6.16 1 E 20.084 8.200 59.156 to 140 0.0 20.084 0.0 10 750.0 0.0144 0.0 28.284 0.407 Vel = 8.07 Computer Programs by Hydratec Inc. Route 111 Windham N.H. USA 03087 Final Calculations - Hazen-Will FIREf "SAFETY INC. AMBIANCE ON THE BEACH Page 7 Date 120108 Hyd. Qa Dia. Fitting Pipe Pt Pt Ref. "C" or Ftng's Pe Pv Notes Point Qt Pf/Ft Eqv. Ln. Total Pf Pn 10 0.0 5.86 1 G 3.834 .100.000 59.563 ..... ...... to 150 2E 35.786 39.620 3.701 Fixed loss = 5 TEST 750.0 0.0162 0.0 139.620 2.257 Vel = 8.92 0.0 750.00 65.521 K Factor= 92.66 C= vs C'S 0 ') 9- Computer Programs by Hydratec Inc. Route 111 Windham N.H. USA 03087 VALONS US Ace FLOOR ME RETENTION VAULT --------_'--------------------- -_--' --- ��___'----_-_—_---__-____-----------------------------____------_—_ KENDALL ST � ^ c 51 lw Lj 7c 0 li Z &I": 0 ..................... tVALONST. --4 ------------------ z EB #5936 rose, Issue Date: 1111312L Revision: —AMgSM—E" csAW�MNMW&� MWALU39sfflmff�� Inv AINFROW�RMW M&IW N2 co z LU ------------------ z Or*V ---------------------------- cl. LU Z-j SCALE: V=20' 20 C3.1 W gii SSFM- FLD2008- 12034/DVA2008- 00003; 121 13 HEILWOOD STREET LLC 26 AVALON LAND TRUST • ABBYDALLAS ENTERPRISES LLC,., 7105 PELICAN ISLAND DR 610 MANDALAY AVE 14515 MIRABELLE VISTA CIR TAMPA FL 33634 - 7461 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1632 TAMPA FL 33626 - 3346 ADRIC, ALFRED C JR ADRIC, ALMUTH H IN DEN WEINGAERTEN 23A 65835 LIEDERBACH TS 00003 - GERMANY ANDRESON, DEAN ANDRESON,ANN 2046 BRENDLA RD CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 1309 BEN - AVRAHAM, RENE BEN - AVRAHAM, SUSAN 3806 S LINWOOD AVE TAMPA FL 33611 - 1528 BUMGARNER, DANA BUMGARNER, MARTHA 5303 ANSONIA CT ORLANDO FL 32839 - 5249 CAY AT CLEARWATER BEACH CONDO 620 MANDALAY AVE CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1632 CORNELL, MICHAEL CORNELL, JANA 1525 WINDING WAY ANDERSON IN 46011 - 1661 DIGIACOMO, MICHAEL DIGIACOMO, LESLIE 107 ANDERSON FARM RD PHOENIXVILLE PA 19460 - 5769 EVERETT, JOE S PO BOX 803 CLEARWATER FL 33757 - 0803 AERQ INC 22 KENDALL ST CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1626 BAY ESPLANADE AT CLEARWATER BE 2110 DREW ST # 100 CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 3231 BRANTNER, DOUGLAS A BRANTNER, LINDA L 14300 E 13TH ST WICHITA KS 67230 - 1450 BYRD, KATHLEEN D 611 POINSETTIA AVE CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1637 CHAPEL BY SEA CLEARWATER BCH C 54 BAY ESPLANADE CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1607 CRIST, GEORGE CRIST, SHARLENE 4729 MOUNTAIN VIEW RD HARRISBURG PA 17110 - 2835 DUMMAR, ANDREW H DUMMAR, JENNIFER 605 POINSETTIA AVE # 5 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - AIELLO, ITALO RUFFOLO, LILIA 93 CORNELIUS PKWY TORONTO ON M61- 2K6 00001 - CANADA BECKERMAN, CHARLES G BECKERMAN, MADELINE L 12044 STONE CROSSING CIR TAMPA FL 33635 - 6227 BROOKS, CAROLYN C REVOCABLE LI 209 SCOTLAND ST DUNEDIN FL 34698 - 6957 CARPENTER, STEVEN K CARPENTER, JANE D 693 W GRAND RIVER OKEMOS MI 48864 - 3110 CLEMEN, MICHAEL G CLEMENS, GWEN S 3920 CAPITOL DR PALM HARBOR FL 34685 - 1079 DAY, LESLIE MC CLAIN DAY, BARRIE M 6127 CEZANNE AVE LUTZ FL 33558 - 2831 DYER, FREDERICK T TRUST DYER, ROSE L TRUST 210 E GOVERNOR PL 1610 ST CHARLES MO 63301 - 4573 FLORENCE ENTERPRISES 603 INDIAN ROCKS RD BELLEAIR FL 33756 - 2056 FLURNOY, RONALD D FLURNOY, MARY ANGELA 2054 LARCHMONT WAY CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 6720 GARRONE, JEFF GENCO, FRANK GIBSON, SUE ELLEN 4518 S CAMERON AVE GENCO, FRANK N 4725 SEYMOUR RD TAMPA FL 33611 - 2223 3019 PALMETTO ST JACKSON MI 49201 - 7636 TAMPA FL 33607 - 2936 GREENWOOD, THOMAS G GREENWOOD, MELISSA M 140 CASA DEL LAGO WAY LENIOR CITY TN 37772 - GTE FLORIDA INCORPORATED PO BOX 152206 IRVING TX 75015 - 2206 HUCKER ENTERPRISES 81 TIMBER DR BERKELEY HEIGHTS NJ 07922 - JACKSON, LANNY R JACKSON, VICKI J 785 BAY ESPLANADE CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1412 JOHNSON, RICHARD M JOHNSON, LORI A `664 N FIRST BANK DR PALATINE IL 60067 - 8112 KNOWLES, NANCY J 41 ,LAKESHORE RD E ° OAKVILLE ON L6J 1 H3 00001 - CANADA ' 'L"OOKRETIS, JOHN L LOOKRETIS, SOPHIE 29 AVALON ST CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1602 MANUS, GEORGE E 9480 BRYNDALE WAY NE ADA M 149301 - 8854 MEROLI, PETRIT 699 BAY ESPANDE CLEARWATER FL 33767 - • GREGORY, STEVE C GRUBB, JOHN D 4502 MARINE PKWY GRUBB, TAMMY L NEW PORT RICHEY FL 34652 - 3332 605 POINSETTIA AVE # 6 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1610 GUNTHER, EDWARD F HUBER, RICHARD C GUNTHER, APPLE R HUBER, DIANE M 3 ASTOR CT 9217 SUNNY OAK DR LAKE FOREST IL 60045 - 4703 RIVERVIEW FL 33569 - 5672 HUNTER, RICHARD F IGGESUND TOOLS INC HUNTER, PEGGY P 220 SCARLET BLVD PO BOX 3646 OLDSMAR FL 34677 - 3016 CHATTANOOGA TN 37404 - 0646 JAY -GEE DEVELOPMENT LLC JILLICH, LIESELOTTE MARIA 13555 AUTOMOBILE DR 602 POINSETTIA AVE CLEARWATER FL 33762 - 3853 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1635 KINNARD, LOUIS R KIRBY, SUSAN M KINNARD, LUCRETIA L 2255 WESTBURY AVE 4013 ZELAR ST CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 6714 TAMPA FL 33629 - 5029 LAZZARA, PAUL LAZZARA, SHEILA 1750 VALLEY VIEW LN STE 210 DALLAS TX 75234 - 9025 LOPEZ, ROSA LOU RYALS 3105 LA SALLE ST TAMPA FL 33607 - 5114 MC COY, DAVID DUVALL, STEPHEN 11580 116TH ST LARGO FL 33778 - 3033 MICHAEL, BASKOVICH MICHAEL, SANDRA 2866 QUAIL HOLLOW RD W CLEARWATER FL 33761 - 3222 LO, JAMES K LO, KAREN A 2966 POST ROCK CT TARPON SPRINGS FL 34688 - 7309 MANDALAY CLEARWATER LLC 8834 N 56TH ST TAMPA FL 33617 - 6214 MEROLI, PETER 610 MANDALAY AVE CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1632 MILLER, DIANE L 622 MANDALAY AVE CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1632 MINER LIVING TRUST MINOR, HELEN MONIN, OLIVIER 774 SAINT ANNE DR 693 W GRAND RIVER MONIN, CAROLINE DUNEDIN FL 34698 - 3403 OKEMOS MI 48864 - 3110 2100 RANGE RD CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 2125 MORAITIS, DENIS • MORDOCHE, LUIS M NAGENGAST, WILLIAM E MORAITIS, MARY MORDOCHE, MARIA E NAGENGAST, JUDITH E 147 AMBLESIDE RD 11042 LYNN LAKE DR 925 ANDERSON FRANKTON RD DES PLAINES IL 60016 - 2652 TAMPA FL 33625 - 5641 ANDERSON IN 46011 - 8737 NATSIS, EVANGELOS NATSIS, MARIA 622 POINSETTIA AVE CLEARWATER FL 33767 - NELSON, EARL G NELSON, GLORIA M 2060 ARCADE ST 1638 ST PAUL MN 55109 - 2565 NOTO, PETER NOTO, MARY 18 PERRYWINKLE WAY WEBSTER NY 14580 - 4217 OGILVIE, SCOTT 18 GLENDALE ST # 1 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1566 PANORAMA ON CLEARWATER BEACH PARE, CAROL A L 15 GLENDALE ST # 15 483 MANDALAY AVE STE 209 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1552 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2035 PELLEGRINELLI, GUY A JR PELLEGRINELLI, MARY 16 GLENDALE ST CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1511 PERLIN, MICHAEL PERLIN, JODI 1970..PROMENADE WAY CLEARWATER FL 33760 - 1734 PHILLIPS, WAYNE H PIERSON, DON C, . PHILLIPS, GAY M P.IERSON, GLORIA G 605 POINSETTIA AVE # 8 5833'MARINER.DR CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1610 TAMPA FL 33609 - 3411 PORTER, THOMAS PRESTON, MICHAEL G THE PORTER, MARCELLA 419 EASTSHORE DR 2256 VICTORIA CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2028 WINDSOR ON N8X 1R1 CANADA 00001 - RASCONA, ANTHONY RASCONA,ESTHER 11 IDLEW ILD ST # 402 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1519 ROPHIE, RALPH A ROPHIE, VANESSA 450 PALM ISL SE CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1938 RICHARDS, JAMES F 1884 CASCADE CT MARCO ISLAND FL 34145 - 4209 ROWE, ROBERT B THE ROWE, WENDY A THE PO BOX 3711 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 8711 NOSTIMO INC ATTN TAX DEPT ONE HESS PLZ WOODBRIDGE NJ 07095 -1229 PALM PAVILION CLWR INC 18 BAY ESPLANADE CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1603 PARKS, DANA L BARKES, MICHAEL G 11961 LOCUST LN COLUMBUS IN 47201 - 8964 PHILLIPS, JOHN 5414 W CRENSHAW TAMPA FL 33634 - 3009 POOK, PEACHES 234 DOLPHIN PT # 1 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2110 .RAILEY, DANIEL E RAILEY, ANN H 1345 S MISSOURI AVE CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 6533 ROHEN, WILLIAM A 1704 N 12TH AVE MELROSE PARK IL 60160 - 2251 ROYAL CAMELOT CONDO ASSN INC 703 COURT ST CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5507 ROYAL CAMELOT LLC ROYAL CAMELOT LLC RUBINSON, AILEEN 119 WOODCREEK DR S 5560 BATES ST 4315 AEGEAN DR # 204C SAFETY HARBOR FL 34695 - SEMINOLE FL 33772 - 7149 TAMPA FL 33611 - 2415 SAMARKOS, EVANGELINE P REVD* SAMPSON, THOMAS A SANFILIPPO, JAMES A SAMARKOS, MICHAEL A SAMPSON, CAROLYN L MARTIN, JOHN E 106 MIDWAY IS 11 IDLEWILD ST # 602 PO BOX 310 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2313 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1521 MIDDLETOWN NJ 07748 - 0310 SHAY, BRIAN & STEPHANIE FAMILY 7838 SE 22ND PL MERCER ISLAND WA 98040 - 2237 SOBOLESKI, JAMES W 191 DEVON DR CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2439 STERNS, DANIEL STERNS,DONYA 2150 120TH PL SE BELLEVUE WA 98005 - 4651 SUNSET GREEN FLASH LLC 10 BAY ESPLANADE CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1603 TINSLEY, RICHARD C TINSLEY, PATSY A 8713 BAY POINTE DR TAMPA FL 33615 - 4900 WALLACE, A BARBARA 1800 RIVERSIDE DR # 3210 COLUMBUS OH 43212 - WESTER, ROBERT M WESTER, PATRICIA A 6 WOODGLEN ESTATES DR ST CHARLES MO 63368 - WILSON, WILLIAM D 217 FERNWOOD PL WOODSTOCK GA 30188 - 6242 ZAIM COTTAGES LLC 610 MANDALAY AVE CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1632 SHEAR, L DAVID 401 E JACKSON ST STE 2700 TAMPA FL 33602 - 5841 SOULOUNIAS, KALIOPE 30 KENDALL ST CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1624 STOUGH, ANTHONY W STOUGH, PATRICIA M 1634 SAN ROY DR DUNEDIN FL 34698 - 3412 SIBERT, LUTHER L JR SIBERT, SHARON D UNIT 3001 777 N ASHLEY DR TAMPA FL 33602 - 4385 SOWAKINAS, DAVID J 2 ADALIA AVE # 408 TAMPA FL 33606 - 3315 STYPUL,BRYAN STYPUL,SHERYL 100 MAIN ST # 301 SAFETY HARBOR FL 34695 - SURFSIDE OF PINELLAS CONDO ASS TALON PROJECT 11 IDLEWILD ST 3437 OTHERDAY CIR CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1563 SHAKOPEE MN 55379 - 9615 VILLAS OF CLEARWATER BEACH CON WAIALUA SUNSET PARADISE LLC :. -'1.5 GLENDALE ST APT A14 5320 COLLEGE BLVD CLEARWATER FL 33767 -1514 OVERLAND PARK KS 66211 - 1621 WALSH, MARY RHODES, QUANAH 286 PRAIRIE VIEW LN WHEELING IL 60090 - 3223 WHITEHURST, DONALD E TESTAMENT 1801 SE US HIGHWAY 19 CRYSTAL RIVER FL 34229 - XANIA INC 1299 MAIN ST STE E DUNEDIN FL 34698 - 5333 WAMO 1211 COURT ST CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5801 WHITLEY, CLARENCE KING, MARGARET M 9982 LAKE SEMINOLE DR W LARGO FL 33773 - 4550 YEAROUT, JANE R YEAROUT, JANET A 806 NARCISSUS CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1334 From The Desk Of Barrie M. Dag Les1Te M. Dag -= ::jj� CA ` U i City Of Clearwater Planning Department Registered with the Citv Clerk RE: Proposed Hotel Setbacks, Height and occupancy changes nve7nnst -nnnn,A 20 Kendall St Lots 5.6.7.8.13 8t 14 Planning Director, Michael Delk, N We formally object to the changes being proposed. We understand the community growth, but certain parameters exist on how this growth should occur for a .purpose. The setbacks effect the beach traffic and public parking, the occupancy rate alone is an issue with the empty rooms that already exist in this area. But the height change request RUINS views and property value to your current residents on the beach. We bought in faith of your current rules and regulations. Now, you are taking away our value in our property. Taking a property from 35 ft to 86.5 is way beyond a small change to existing regulations. Small setback changes are not often allowed much less all sides of a building and one side a change from 20ft to 5 ft and 150ft to 1001 The Condos are not allowed to go weekly in renting due to restrictions that exist today, but now the accommodation allotment is to change from 58 to 88 rooms. Please do not punish current residents with one groups greed. This community has grown well and now needs controls kept in place not removed. We as citiz ns implore you not to devalue our property any more than the economy h4 already done. Please notice the people who support -you already! Sincere Barrie Michael Day and Leslie M. Day Citizens of your community 605 Poinsettia Ave #7 *Clearwater Beach, Florida * 33767 HM: 813- 841 -7898 * CELL: 813- 263 -8882 D ECEY-E ,AN 1 6 ZM PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES CITY OF CLEARWATER To: Scott Kurleman, Planner III FAX 727 562 4865 ScotLkurleman@myclearwater.com myclearwater.com Community Development Board, Michael Delk, Planning Director Cynthia E. Goudeau AMC, City Clerk Date of hearing: Tuesday, June 16,2009 Re: Proposed Development agreement between City of Clearwater and Panorama on Clearwater Beach, LLC and ,Evangeline P. Samarkos, as trustee of the ]Evangeline P. Samarkos Revocable 'Trust UAD 3/27 /06, Michael A. Samarkos, Victoria Markey Property in question: .60 acres described as 20 Kendall St. Lots 5,6,7,8,13 & 14 Block 7 Page 5 of the Public Records of Pinellas County DVA200 3 I was sent a notification of this proposal hearing and I hereby strongly object to this proposal. I object to many of the items in this proposal. Signature Date Print name C29" Sr Address L ar�i1T�T .%ZHF L 33767 City, State, Zip Code P B1 BUTLER, F�� t' ►Ve Knnw n' /mf Grows Horticulture Professional Butler Design Group, Inc Ron Belko Jr. 11" Sabal Palm 3, Mechanical Damage to trunk 2 4203 46 "' Avenue North 4 3 9" Sabal Palm St. Petersburg, Florida 33714 Ph (727) 521 -1684 4 11" Sabal Palm 3, Nails in trunk, Mechanical injury to trunk Fax (727) 527 -7422 10" Sabal Palm 4 LJ E -mail: bdpintampabay.rr.com 3, Inventoried tree from a distance outside fence viewed approx. 2700 of tree 7 19" Sabal Palm Tree Inventory iI - �^t ao r 2, Moderate to severe injury to trunk, Inventoried tree from a distance outside fence viewed approx. 2700 of tree Ambiance r.-I o fJ Avalon & Kendall La Clearwater, Florida ^'- .� eM ids November 29, 2008 As required by the City of Clearwater, I have completed an assessment of all trees (4" dbh or greater) on the subject site. My opinion is set forth below as to the viability (rating of 1 -5) and any potential hazards of these trees. # / TREE DBH & SPECIES / RATING AND COMMENTS 1 11" Sabal Palm 3, Mechanical Damage to trunk 2 10" Sabal Palm 4 3 9" Sabal Palm 3, Nails in trunk, Mechanical injury to trunk 4 11" Sabal Palm 3, Nails in trunk, Mechanical injury to trunk 5 10" Sabal Palm 4 6 10" Sabal Palm 3, Inventoried tree from a distance outside fence viewed approx. 2700 of tree 7 19" Sabal Palm 3, Inventoried tree from a distance outside fence viewed approx. 2700 of tree 8 13" Sabal Palm 2, Moderate to severe injury to trunk, Inventoried tree from a distance outside fence viewed approx. 2700 of tree I affirm that my opinions have been made in good faith, with no coercion from others. I further affirm that I have no interest with the parties or people involved with neither this issue nor any interest with regard to the outcome. Sincerely, Ron Belko Jr, ISA Certified Arborist, Certificate #FL -5802A Butler Design Group/ Golden Rain Nursery, Inc. 3 ZZ .I�� Z�G� �1�. � ��Q�� ® �3 lm; �. llili _M,' M3DView3 E =r ( 1 t. M 30 View 2 ".,.Revisbn Schedule Revlebn Number baud M i J C6 W -p L Oo Z if W U z� Q � m� QU d hitects 51� O Du R' "596 wnw;tlNN Mt 91 DRAWN Author EDIT DATE 5/1420099.10:52 PM ISSUE DATE Issue Dat SCALE JOB NUMBER Project Number SHEET NAME Model V._ SHEETNUMBER AR -1.0.0 op IRV I , .. Y -1 KA 'A 111 MIR -- - --------------------- Reveion Schedule LMI—ed by Uj 00 r LL LLJ Z co co a r c h i t e c t s QU —,;r, DRAWN AuQuX` &1420099.1d:31 PM ISSUE DATE Issue DaM SCALE JOB NUMBER PM,eCt Number SHEETNAME East El..lba SHEET NUMBER AR-1.0.1 ORPS"INAL PTCEOWED "LANNING. Cri'l IONIC La�w Out - U .. 0, Ma PIT nd i _-1 v yp Rwbwn SGhetlule Rwiebn Number bwed W H 00 _ LL W 1- U zcp Q � co CZ 2i QU d I Lu architect, 'J2].1J65(Y.0 www.tllwarehlfects. c Om eatut+uan n�a tx9. DRAWN Author eeiT &' ms 5/14/2009 9.17 45 PM ISSUE DATE Issue Date SCALE JOB NUMBER Project Number SHEET NAME West ...bon SHEET NUMBER AR -1.0.2 OPI;IONAL RFCEIVFD KAN ca y ROWW Sr tM Revision ..., _._..._..__ Numb. owed I I I I W 70 t i os _ I W �- U W zcz a� m� 2i QU i architects �Q..tir;O 9pri )2].>:S4,b www.giworchheCls.<o situ hlisM1 ed iV.91 DRAWN Author EDIT DATE 5/142009 9'.19'.55 PM ISSUE DATE ewe Date SCALE JOB NUMBER Project Number SHEET NAME South Elevation SHEET NUMBER AR -1.0.3 I'VE D I ti PLANNPNG; bw� .. At CITY CIF CLLQ VAT& m I Trrglfrijm Reviwon Schedule R—m- ' Number I W..d by 'U D t � 4- 00 r LL L.: ku 75 'L C) ei�abr�> non X99. F, 216- PRAWN AuMm EDIT DATE 5114,2009 9.22'.26 PM ISSUE DATE I_. Date — SCALE JOB NUMBER Prooct Number SHEET NAM Nm h ElevaOOu SHEET NUMBER AR-1.0.4 ii iii IN'll I I 111�1514� IT, III "A ftASI Numl- I 1--d by O0 -r LL W Z LU ORS FINAL RPCEIV' 1) PLANNiN riv bk*,,ttvNWT Cff Y OF CLLARWAE�'k HP111Am 1, '1-'.:. OMP L jgg Mill ilull Alt M K V " Aq 1.0 g. DIM" M P I zo�,2� ere'! -110 7�C,4 n )t JAW M Vol,, ............... J, M, oil 1 0 11 gg- -mm op, 2- I. I M-11 1 11 81-1111 W- i5s, I! m IN -777=-;4� , trAji ro ill � SEA W N II lis ii -41 51 II W Min IRA AN a-A I WON as il I I ggn Mill ■ 41-11% .1. Zj P 'Elff it Ml F IN All R IN mo, gg, e3 ` �m EN Kr" 4ioA Ilk , Till t E. .4m Ijl * Ord S1 1111.9 �1111 I I Kill, gill: Mill Wl I H iii 9.�ili113I9A nn 911 11.1 11 1 1 , if IN ill 111! 111111 L T—F 111 11I1 gal fill mill 11111 poll _ 11111 v: gig N 111 III If ILI if, M7 Mm trr M 22 I nr A, LL, a .� f Flill 12am yI J$,: - kill • ltd LU % I 1' d- AVALON STREET LEVELS AVALON STREET LEVEL AVALON STREET LEVEL AVALON STREET LEVEL 200' 200' 200' 200' _ _, -_ -._ 7-f fll. - _ -._ - -_ - -_- - -_ - -. —__ - -- ___- CID A- _ 1' ? IT- - - - - -i - - -� - �I - -- r -= - -- / , / / / / CID X7 J77 co ;1151.1, 4 100' 100' 100' / � 100' j ;/ /i/ /// // / //i /�/ / �/ iU j' he Ina hel Nei / / / //. U 00 /j m j% //, ,, �,; m � /, /// F-� t7u 00 00 Ln /V/ 100' KEN DALL STREET: 100' KEN DALL STREET 100' KEN DALL STREET 100' KEN DALL STREET * Guest units designated as "Rooms" are overnight accommodations; guest units designated as "Suites" are fractional o al own r e shi P �— AVALON STREET LEVELS AVALON STREET LEVEL 200' 200' SPILLWAY BASIN FIRE PUMP SPILLWAY BASIN TRANSFORMER BELOW gig 10.1 n' � 00 — - R = 10'- 0" IY O i di V I Q ' O ' C in I� O C — — ® — — ^ ^ Q — — — — ® v 1.0 Q- 100' ® o C c 100' IV) Rio 0 1 9 2 a� I 10 2 aN, 18_67' ` ^ 10 .1104 00 / — / -- 00 1 I 1 2T M 0' I � A210 0' ' 2' 3rd o ldg land6 ng to 2n lev el 1 I 1 I 1 7.25_ N transfer beams - -- - I 100' 100' KEN DALL STREET KEN DALL STREET S AVALON 200' STREET 5'SETBACK 100' KEN DALL STREET LEVEL 1 1 I Y V 00 LA in 1 1 0 REVISIONS BY 051209 re DRC comm 3n,,o LU o ' i AREA I 1 PARKING I_ UNITS * 04 03 09 ISSUE DATE 6- LEVEL I ! L - - -- - -- - - - - - -- -- - - conditioned unconditione T TAL O i SPACES __ -- - . -___- - - -- - -- -- -GUEST ROOMS- - - I - - -- -I- - -,- — K QQ S T. I I I -- - - - -- i 800 SUITES UI ' 1 000 - -- - -- -- -- TOTAL -- ' 1250 - T. FILE NAME o-- i i i SCHEMATIC PLANS SHEET NUMBER A VU cn 1 I 545 1 20 255 20 800 j 29 LU z I - - — - I -- - - -- I - - — - -- -- - i Y 1 2 r•- 1 � 20 600 20 600 � 3 z Q 1 - - j - - - - U,--- - - - - -- Q Lz 3 I 17 750 17 750 I 32 4 13 650 11 5 150 18800 � j I � 14 1 4 I 8 1 1 i I, 8 I 1 z 5 14 020 j 1 050 15 070 141 6 5 25 j 25 -! - - -- 6 - - - -- - - - - - 14 130 1 1 135 u"► 15 265 110 15 1 1 1 1 1 2 4 19 j 1 5 m _ ---- - -- - - - -- - I 7 i 14 130 - - - - - - -- --- - - - - -- - 1 135 ------------------ 15 265 10 1 3 -- 131 I - - - - -- j 1 - - -- �- - - - 2 1 2 -- - -- 5 - - - - -- 18 15 265 10 ! 1 3 2 j 2 5 1 8 14 130 i 1 135 13 �1 1 •18 TOTAL 11 70 355 1 68 460 138 815 94 147110 16 74 ; 3 5 1 6 14 88 100' KEN DALL STREET * Guest units designated as "Rooms" are overnight accommodations; guest units designated as "Suites" are fractional o al own r e shi P �— AVALON STREET LEVELS AVALON STREET LEVEL 200' 200' SPILLWAY BASIN FIRE PUMP SPILLWAY BASIN TRANSFORMER BELOW gig 10.1 n' � 00 — - R = 10'- 0" IY O i di V I Q ' O ' C in I� O C — — ® — — ^ ^ Q — — — — ® v 1.0 Q- 100' ® o C c 100' IV) Rio 0 1 9 2 a� I 10 2 aN, 18_67' ` ^ 10 .1104 00 / — / -- 00 1 I 1 2T M 0' I � A210 0' ' 2' 3rd o ldg land6 ng to 2n lev el 1 I 1 I 1 7.25_ N transfer beams - -- - I 100' 100' KEN DALL STREET KEN DALL STREET S AVALON 200' STREET 5'SETBACK 100' KEN DALL STREET LEVEL 1 1 I Y V 00 LA in 1 1 0 REVISIONS BY 051209 re DRC comm 3n,,o DRAWN d RC EDIT DATE 04 03 09 ISSUE DATE ' SCALE i JOB NO. e learwater Beach Indlfc ej FILE NAME o-- i i i DRAWN d RC EDIT DATE 04 03 09 ISSUE DATE ' SCALE 11 a 30' 11,3601 JOB NO. e learwater Beach Indlfc ej FILE NAME SITE3 0 - A100 SHEET NAIVE SCHEMATIC PLANS SHEET NUMBER A VU N c J 41 Q O 0.. 10' -0" 15' -0" Setback 2:1 Step back i I i Eifs "Eyebrow" I I � Impact Rated, Low'e' Tinted Glass in Alum. Frame Efis Finish F-- Spanish Tile Roof Building �I�� VIII /• ,tt Y L!'jp'3 Y .' Q�.� \ ■j.�:� ■fll ®]Y�S'rAt-fst, I �;o._ I _ _ k W � � _ ��,i ■ � � Iii ' I 0■ ■ ■MIM !; 'i' 11�11jIIlll�Il.11 II f illyI !'.I !! `� ■ -��: �� IN . y�li.i1 �I: ��.I�..��.,..i '_iiii_i.il �II�I�I0111111�11�11�1 1>�llll11 ll I1i� � 1 ��!a�I��H��l��'I If1 1 • ; ■MEN ■ ■; ■■, ft klI !! 1! 11111 Illt 'II ;- I 1 I mom, NUMN I' i I III II I 'Ililll111 III I k 1 I P'I _� - - - - -_ �> l�1��1�11��I�1lll�ll�l�l�llll��1 _II�I�I I. ��ill�� t ■�1 111 i 1T�11 lip p !11 IIIi� mom, li III It I�I .h -I�.I. III I I i lil I I I i {1q 1 .4` ■ "I 11 Spillway" 0 S Q) Impact Rated Spanish Tile Roof Copper Cap Flashing o Spandrel Glass a 5 ■■■ ■': ■ ■' I i I'i � �l: I � � I I I I �I i - ...�_.�� 111111111111111111111111 I IIII I I I I � 111111 III ulll�uq111�II IILIIIII I � II VIII �� I II1�11�II11�1�� Y .. �� .I. .. _( m,i I \I Mimi 111111111 IF �ij ILJ Lam• L LL /v] L(1v1 Lfy� �i/ (nom.a1 Lti�jj a r i L J L J J L L 1g:%g:,Lwww J J 9 rIJ LE � q �fs U L M � y � J � J J � y Rf J � LL�W �T",J � � -� -■ � � � � � a � � � !F iN ^A �Q _ a u o a m J J Lrs J _ A * C *, ,II r� * ♦ !�. L � �� SS-L �,,�,y.€ I � , .rc�a�)....r.., �O� V,]� J Y *]� /} Vii LL•V L�+� �.V.�7� �,p Y`,I`� p_'£4 L ®tl V L.V V,�1 1 E�/a] ®U V�]I I(ejvYj v1.. , W C W C 7 G 1 0 O IP LL J LL• ,il �' •J L}s alj J �j JJ �(. �x �J I ,y J L .ai.:,.. LL LL' J �( `� LL. �` (n al � J LL• •J J J a3 L .] cr r�, '1, rF , P , G '15 3� � q� � IF q � ��ia • ar", dii rG � F ar " G I,- ....... q, � 51 Fa jl 51 6� IF W, �G qLi R^9 IF r 'I r ,J� rc r fir W��PG '1,�rG 9�� q �� a> #� +> >�c+�>��'� �Q�� a�N�� a� a � #� o ,� ■'� � _ •>�o��_ o ®� �o � o � oat I��4�0>�0�0,, �.... i� _ .li�rr,�4 ��s�_ ice„•• �Y��r,�..,,.� -�� y �r. �JI�. _ 1 �$�..q� � ��, � �� ,.,q � � - IfC- ur.��G U # �� 1 ± � w,fU� �' � L 1'l w' � ,w, b� 'R 'w +�� f # � � �L � wr `R��aU Gs, rc>R � s Iw ``# r , rc��, e • - - un �y--rL Ie _� e� ■ � �g � Y�iG_ i�,q.@�.Q'� �,�� abL �.,�,a��1 1 .., . _ • • • • I�'°5 ``'�, �w. ��aG'r� �� .�x�i Irv.^g1 wq� �',•rvq� �`+q�F � �0.9 C�',q'e� � ..- .__... ,T.. -.,:_: ��fi,4Ya ��a� �r� ,�� J �u�s --� -�i�U_ ��-L _ _ �':' .:''., I xx�� + (��) + a + ,y .y • rC 'A rG 'A111� .M, . 4J y.'1 ,y'J"l r(` ++'J, rG q, rC \� +% d�� LL*'J L'FOJ 2� � � L'btiMJ � O � � � ' � .. •F lx � � � # � �/. S� h� � iF xt xxY � , b +��, ri�� , *r��i *ar� *a �♦ ► *� L�� *�� ° , , a L s W R W,: G m rG - rG F � W, W l� F W fJ' , F w r 1 9 F b Y1 I� r s • a q F A W W Wy R Rl, rR W ' �rF W I �� P � I" ; G� ��. +r �►aa� ;a�r c•7>�o>� ��:• �``• ®��o � ��co. ooh � � �� c� Q � ��J 0 0�0�: � E' , � � o o � ; �L yJ L� . J V' .]J�L• J L OJ �: a1j LL a1j xV" J L � OZ - f L J L'4 4L l� LF :i LL J� � ' J � � �� -..- �� L ��. r) R (/y �� "J[��"/) F • r q� R[/y�')d� W R ��'''1111 F R .l R q1 {{,. ((�� . ^y P(�� I�.a ///___...,,,,,, (/��) iE�� LCta L�J�•' J�� ®331�L' J LGV� L4'�•I 1• _aJ ��Si ®aIJ L� lxP�� ...� �•. � �? a1j ® fc L•V ' ✓ � C , ��J �d � � C ©a1j � � `© [o® LVJ ®iL Wtif SxVI �1 IL'�. lxiOiL IU'�`3 S?L IL'OtL � � V � r� � v '� , , '�Y' . W '1 Ca 4l rR F s! R F � rG '1 G W Ca 7, R al rR F ■ ■ ■ - - � eu � et �, .rrv. � � = -_i � a ry �r u �a �s �, .c � �.� s L�._,n, I+•rM� Imo. I�.s:. :rra �a ., r��J s � � � . a m a a %1 West er, i Q q=° 7' Revision Schedule Revision Number K-a, Revision Schedule Revision Number I Issued by r. Y CU 00 i U. Y W L �. U Z W`V CU m k ajc"hite.ct.s 542 Do.u�tas AV*" be Dohedln> Fl 34698 727.236.6000 vvwt.dlwQrchitects,com established 1981 DRAWN Jonathan E MD HATE assaro 5/27/2009 ,�.,,3 AM ISSUE DATE 01/28/09 p SCALE 1/811 = 1' -0" J JOB NUMBER 08 -000 SHEET NAME Exterior Elevation ( West) SHEET NUMBER A4.0.0 0 C Q. 0 a 1 East 1/8 = 1 0 Revision Number Issued by toC�c :Z) ,rte° W l 1 East 1/8 = 1 0 d a J Revision Schedule Revision Number Issued by C :Z) ,rte° W l GIL d a J Revision Schedule Revision Number Issued by J Co W L 00 M V- W U � Z ca Q m ca QU arc'h.ijer, ts 542 Douglas Avenue Duhodlh'> FL 34698 727.784.6000 v w.c11IvvCtr.'ghttects,com estatdished ' 1981 DRAWN Jonathan ED•T MITE 5 12712009Massaro4 AM ISSUE DATE 01/28/09 SCALE 1/8" = 1' -0" JOB NUMBER 08 -000 SHEET NAME Exterior Elevation ( East) SHEET NUMBER A4.0.1 C J N Q. O a I I I I 5' -011 Setback I I I I I I I I I I Aluminum Railing Efis Moulding I I I i- — 121 -01 I I I I I I I I .r Cub Finish Spanish Tile Roof r CI{UIGLUU IVIULdI Panels 4 MIU111 IUUC VUlvCU to 58' Radius @ Center Line /11U111 Rtlllllly System Cllb r'llllbll on Concrete Building P11U111 IX 11113 OUL Glass Railing System Glazed CMU or Perforated Metal Panel 1 South 1 /8" = 1' -0" N C J 2 a) C. 0 a I I I 5' -0" Setback I I I I _ I I I T.O. Stair Roof 95' -611 Elevator & Stair 901-411 V T.O. Parapet A--\ 85' - 2"!!V N co va s V m a b a n. Revision Schedule e � Issued by �n 3 Revision Schedule Revision Number Issued by J CU F- 00 T 1 LL �Wy L- V CD Z CU M� W CU �U a .C._h :i t:s C' f s' 542 poUlds AvenUe Di ned3n. T- 34698 727.736,6000 ww,cilwcirc hi#ects.c orn estobifshod 3981• DRAWN Jonathan ED•T nnTE 5127/2009Mas TJ AM ISSUE DATE 01/28/09 SCALE 1/8" = 1' -01, JOB NUMBER 08 -000 SHEET NAME Exterior Elevation ( South ) SHEET NUMBER A4.0.2 1I � �, � � i � 3 ©1 O SP 3in SP O a W �i w O SPA 0 ABBREVIATION LEGEND: T BY NUMPER F.I.R. = FOUND IRON ROD SIZE INDICATED) SEC. = SECTION GV GAS VALVE S.I.R. = SET IRON ROD 1/2�' P.S.M. NO. 3983 TM'• = TOWNSHIP DCV - DOUBLE CHECK VALVE F.I.P. = FOUND IRON PIPE (SIZE INDICATED) PROFESSIONAL SURVEYOR �c MAPPER 300 A SOUTH BELCHER ROAD CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33765 OFFICE (727) 474 -3751 FAX (727) 474 -3753 = RANGE GM - = GAS METER F.N.D. - FOUND NAIL & DISK D D = DEED SV = SEWER VALVE S.N.D. = SET NAIL & DISK P.S.M. NO. 3983 P = PLAT WM =WATER METER F.C.M. = FOUND CONCRETE MONUMENT M = MEASURED TS = TRAFFIC SIGN P.R.M. = PERMANENT REFERENCE MONUMENT C I =CALCULATED PP =POWER POLE P.C.P. = PERMANENT CONTROL POINT = FIELD = LIGHT POLE P.I. = POINT OF INTERSECTION R = RADIAL H =FIRE HYDRANT P.C. = POINT OF CURVE PB. =PLAT BOOK U11L U11 = UTILITY P.O.B. = POINT OF BEGINNING PG. = PAGE TR = TRANSFORMER R/W = RIGHT -OF -WAY CONC.= CONCRETE WV = WATER VALVE TYP. = TYPICAL COV. - COVERED CLF = CHAIN LINK FENCE OHW = OVERHEAD WIRES ASPH. = ASPHALT E/P = EDGE OF PAVEMENT ULP = UTIUTY/UGHT POLE PVMT. = PAVEMENT O.R. - OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK GA = GUY ANCHOR P.S.M. = PROFESSIONAL SURVEYOR & MAPPER ULP SANITARY MANHOLE 3 RIM ELEV. = 4.67 INV. ELEV. = 0.97 a�w A VALON ST. - - - - - - - -CO SANITARY MANHOLE (40 R /W) RIM ELEV. = 4.70 --- - - - - -- - - - -- ------"^---------- ---------- - - - - -- - - - - - -- S N. INV. ELEV. _ -0.60 _ ------------ - - - - -- " .y 2 CONC. VALLEY CURB I W. INV. ELEV. _ -0.20 -- ----- ' -' - -'" 8 SANITARY SEWER F.C.M. 4 "x 4" I S. INV. ELEV. _ -0.65 LB 6928 I 4 Z: I wv + wM N 90 °00'00" E® (M) 0 "�" ® wMm ®WM ® 200.00' (M F- - - - - - -WV 10' S0' (P) 50' (P) 50� (P) WM 50' (P) wry s.4' - - - - - -- F.N.D. I I I I I BUILDING S I.R. " " i LB 3889 r I I I ENCROACHES I 6" CONC. CURB) I I (� (F.C.M. 47 4 I I LB 6928 I I I I 1.01' W.) I I I I I I I I I I �' I 1 STORY �. I I �- BUILDING # 608 I LOT 4 �= LOT 5 LOT 6 LOT 7 LOT 8 I B L O C K 7 B L O C K 7 I B L O C K 7 B L O C K 7 I B L O C K 7 ELEV. 005.15 I 1 I I 2 I I I 3 I 3 I B L O C K 7 I SP S P ENCROAC I SP 8 I 0.5' I I I I I W 7.2' I I COULD NOT SET I 3.6' 4 I CORNER OF WALL �� Z 2 STORY I I I I OCCUPIES BOUNDARY I a I\ _ N BUILDING # 604 I I c ORNER 3 0 & ''' N FLOOR I I P } V I I 6 AIN LINK FENCE I 3• z Q M ELEV. = 5.13 I z 5 I I I ,� o 0,�3I I >_ 6' WOOD FENCE 0" 9" o I �o �'� Sw. CORNER OF WALL wl PP N 89 °5948" W (M I 100.0 %'(M) 0.27'N.. 0.66'W. OF S.I.R. I �I o_ : i' I----- - - - - -- ------- - - - --- _ ----- - - - --� _QI t:. °" Hw F-I I Q Q ::. Z G �. STORAGE ri 45.8' I Q I Qj _ _ < : BUILDING 8.0' S.I.R. � ( q 4• CHAIN UNK FENCE I O_ O- PARKING METER POST ' CONC. " " I I ¢ a `� WITH 2 METERS (TYP.) '2 N 10.0' N I WALL ^i (F.C.M. 4 x 4 Ca 31.2 1 STORY Ui LB 6928 I BUILDING N 1.05 W.) I Q ". -- -- - - �s I FLOOR 1 STORY BUILDING # 602 I I $ I ELEV. = 8.80 FLOOR ELEV. = 7.79 I I t I � rn L O T 1 2 I I z Q A/C 3 I I I I BLOCK 7 I I 03 :'. < 2 STORY g I I Z = = BUILDING I I I I cn FLOOR ELEV. (0 = 8.44 = I L O T 1 5 p :s ' L O T 1 4 /C E W 2 STORY L O T 1 1 L O T 1 0 I I B L 0 C K 7 0 B L 0 C K 7 /P L O T 1 3 N BUUIL2DING I B L 0 C K 7 I B L 0 C K 7 I I y: n. ~ - BLOCK M FLOOR ELEV. I I I I o - 8.16 I I I I I s.ls'a I I I I WATER METER a 31.2 I I I I 6" CON CURB j &CHECK vALVE W. S .s w POLE 11" , ASPH. PVMT 0 I I I I- - - - -- s "- S0 (P) ? 50 (P),---- .- - - - - -- I- -- 149.93 (M)- 150_(P) --- 1----- - - - - -- I -89 °59'39' -' -W- M T 00.00' M FOUND "x" I c SIR CUT IN I SIDEWALK F.C.M. 4 "x 4" 18" CONC. CURB (TOP BROKEN) -- 8" SANITARY SEWER 8_ "_S_AN. �S- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -3- ------------------------------------------------------------ - - - - -- SEWER -- I �- - T. SANITARY MANHOLE SANITARY MANHOLE KENDALL S al RIM ELEV. = 4.57 4,z RIM ELEV. = 4.19 (40' R /W) _`nlw N. INV. ELEV. = -1.08 SW. INV. ELEV. = 1.59 w1� E. INV. ELEV. _ -0.93 E. INV. ELEV. = 0.94 � S. INV. ELEV. _ -1.13 W. INV. ELEV. = -0.23 SYMBOL LEGEND *'0' DENOTES A PALM TREE - SIZE INDICATED LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lots 5, 6, 7, 8, 13 and 14, Block 7, REVISED MAP OF CLEARWATER BEACH, according to the plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 11, Page 5, of the Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida. The above described parcel contains 0.60 acres, more or less. SECTION 5, TOWNSHIP 29 SOUTH, RANGE 15 EAST PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA N 20 0 10 20 40 GRAPHIC SCALE 1 inch = 20 ft. TREE INVENTORY NOTES 8, TREE PROPOSED TO BE REMOVED TREE CANOPY /ROOT ZONE TREE DBH 8 TREE SYMBOL ® TREE BOTANICAL ABBR. QV TREE INVENTORY 4� � RATING f:" RELOCATE TREE PER LANDSCAPE PLAN TREE INVENTORY NUMBER Tree Inventory by: BUTLER DESIGN GROUP, INC 4203 46TH AVE. N. ST. PETERSBURG, FL. 33714 PH 727 -521 -1684, FAX: 727 - 527 -7422, E- MAIL•BDGIOTAMPABAY.RR.COM DRAWN BY: RON BELKO ISA CERTIFICATION # FL -5802A Jam= Cabbage / Sabal Palm (Sp) Sabal palmetto TREE TABULATION TABLE 8 TREES INVENTORIED T BY NUMPER L� Al 5,6,7,8 CERTIFIED AS A BOUNDARY SURVEY LAST DAY OF FIELD WORK: 8/13/08 SURVEYORS NOTES: 2, ALL BEAR NGSTANDND FOUND DESIGNATING THE PREVIOUS SURVEYOR OR COMPANY AS NOTED. PLAT AND/OR DEED UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 3. NO UNDERGROUND ENCROACHMENTS, FOUNDATIONS OR UTILITIES HAVE BEEN LOCATED OR SHOWN UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED HEREON. 4. NO INSTRUMENTS OF RECORD REFLECTING EASEMENTS, RIGHTS -OF -WAY AND /OR OWNERSHIP WERE FURNISHED THIS SURVEYOR EXCEPT AS SHOWN HEREON 5. ELEVATION DATUM: N.A.V.D. 1988, BENCHMARK: CITY OF CLEARWATER "H -02 ", ELEV. = 5.2142 6. BASIS OF BEARINGS: S. R/W LINE OF AVALON ST-BEING N 90'00'00" E (ASSUMED). 7. UNLESS IT BEARS THE SIGNATURE AND THE ORIGINAL RAISED SEAL OF A FLORIDA LICENSED SURVEYOR AND MAPPER, THIS DRAWING, SKETCH, PLAT OR MAP IS FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY AND IS NOT VALID. 8.) THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT 1 HAVE CONSULTED THE�FEDERAL INSURANCE ADMINISTRATION FLOOD HAZARD BOUNDARY MAP, COMMUNITY NO. 125096, PANEL NO. 0102 G. PANEL EFFECTIVE DATE 9/3/2003, AND THE PARCEL SHOWN HEREON IS IN FLOOD ZONE AE WITH A BASE FLOOD ELEVATION OF 12.0' M.S.L. AND ZONE VE WITH A BASE FLOOD ELEVATION OF 13.0' M.S.L. 1 TREES RATED 2 OR LESS ON INVENTORY 7 3 PROTECTED TREES TO BE REMOVED RATED 3+ 5,6,8 PROFESSIONAL SURVEYOR �c MAPPER 300 A SOUTH BELCHER ROAD CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33765 OFFICE (727) 474 -3751 FAX (727) 474 -3753 PALMS REMOVED DEFICIT @ 2-112- CAL EA. 7 -112 TOTAL INCHES REMOVED (DEFICITINCHES) 82 TOTAL INCHES PROPOSED TREES INSTALLED (notincluding anypalms) PROPOSED INSTALLED PALMS 311 CREDIT WITH A HEIGHT OF 1WCT 21 SABALS = 2113 OR 7 + 12 FOXTAILS =1213 OR 4 7 +4 =11 11 X 2.5" = 27.5" "CREDIT 82 +275= 109.5 CREDIT- 75 DEFICIT = 102 "CREDIT CHECKED BY: ECE EDWARD C. ELLIOTT FLORIDA PROFESSIONAL SURVEYOR AND MAPPER N0. 3983 JOB NO. 080021 DATE No. REVISION 8 TREES INVENTORIED T BY NUMPER 4 TREES INSIDE PROPERTY BOUNDARIES 5,6,7,8 CERTIFIED AS A BOUNDARY SURVEY LAST DAY OF FIELD WORK: 8/13/08 SURVEYORS NOTES: 2, ALL BEAR NGSTANDND FOUND DESIGNATING THE PREVIOUS SURVEYOR OR COMPANY AS NOTED. PLAT AND/OR DEED UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 3. NO UNDERGROUND ENCROACHMENTS, FOUNDATIONS OR UTILITIES HAVE BEEN LOCATED OR SHOWN UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED HEREON. 4. NO INSTRUMENTS OF RECORD REFLECTING EASEMENTS, RIGHTS -OF -WAY AND /OR OWNERSHIP WERE FURNISHED THIS SURVEYOR EXCEPT AS SHOWN HEREON 5. ELEVATION DATUM: N.A.V.D. 1988, BENCHMARK: CITY OF CLEARWATER "H -02 ", ELEV. = 5.2142 6. BASIS OF BEARINGS: S. R/W LINE OF AVALON ST-BEING N 90'00'00" E (ASSUMED). 7. UNLESS IT BEARS THE SIGNATURE AND THE ORIGINAL RAISED SEAL OF A FLORIDA LICENSED SURVEYOR AND MAPPER, THIS DRAWING, SKETCH, PLAT OR MAP IS FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY AND IS NOT VALID. 8.) THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT 1 HAVE CONSULTED THE�FEDERAL INSURANCE ADMINISTRATION FLOOD HAZARD BOUNDARY MAP, COMMUNITY NO. 125096, PANEL NO. 0102 G. PANEL EFFECTIVE DATE 9/3/2003, AND THE PARCEL SHOWN HEREON IS IN FLOOD ZONE AE WITH A BASE FLOOD ELEVATION OF 12.0' M.S.L. AND ZONE VE WITH A BASE FLOOD ELEVATION OF 13.0' M.S.L. 1 TREES RATED 2 OR LESS ON INVENTORY 7 3 PROTECTED TREES TO BE REMOVED RATED 3+ 5,6,8 PROFESSIONAL SURVEYOR �c MAPPER 300 A SOUTH BELCHER ROAD CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33765 OFFICE (727) 474 -3751 FAX (727) 474 -3753 PALMS REMOVED DEFICIT @ 2-112- CAL EA. 7 -112 TOTAL INCHES REMOVED (DEFICITINCHES) 82 TOTAL INCHES PROPOSED TREES INSTALLED (notincluding anypalms) PROPOSED INSTALLED PALMS 311 CREDIT WITH A HEIGHT OF 1WCT 21 SABALS = 2113 OR 7 + 12 FOXTAILS =1213 OR 4 7 +4 =11 11 X 2.5" = 27.5" "CREDIT 82 +275= 109.5 CREDIT- 75 DEFICIT = 102 "CREDIT '�i FOR THE BENEFIT OF: NORTHSIDE ENGINEERING SERVICES INC. ? ®�� © CERTIFIED AS A BOUNDARY SURVEY LAST DAY OF FIELD WORK: 8/13/08 SURVEYORS NOTES: 2, ALL BEAR NGSTANDND FOUND DESIGNATING THE PREVIOUS SURVEYOR OR COMPANY AS NOTED. PLAT AND/OR DEED UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 3. NO UNDERGROUND ENCROACHMENTS, FOUNDATIONS OR UTILITIES HAVE BEEN LOCATED OR SHOWN UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED HEREON. 4. NO INSTRUMENTS OF RECORD REFLECTING EASEMENTS, RIGHTS -OF -WAY AND /OR OWNERSHIP WERE FURNISHED THIS SURVEYOR EXCEPT AS SHOWN HEREON 5. ELEVATION DATUM: N.A.V.D. 1988, BENCHMARK: CITY OF CLEARWATER "H -02 ", ELEV. = 5.2142 6. BASIS OF BEARINGS: S. R/W LINE OF AVALON ST-BEING N 90'00'00" E (ASSUMED). 7. UNLESS IT BEARS THE SIGNATURE AND THE ORIGINAL RAISED SEAL OF A FLORIDA LICENSED SURVEYOR AND MAPPER, THIS DRAWING, SKETCH, PLAT OR MAP IS FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY AND IS NOT VALID. 8.) THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT 1 HAVE CONSULTED THE�FEDERAL INSURANCE ADMINISTRATION FLOOD HAZARD BOUNDARY MAP, COMMUNITY NO. 125096, PANEL NO. 0102 G. PANEL EFFECTIVE DATE 9/3/2003, AND THE PARCEL SHOWN HEREON IS IN FLOOD ZONE AE WITH A BASE FLOOD ELEVATION OF 12.0' M.S.L. AND ZONE VE WITH A BASE FLOOD ELEVATION OF 13.0' M.S.L. SCALE: 1" = 20' PROFESSIONAL SURVEYOR �c MAPPER 300 A SOUTH BELCHER ROAD CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33765 OFFICE (727) 474 -3751 FAX (727) 474 -3753 DRAWN BY: PT & ED CHECKED BY: ECE EDWARD C. ELLIOTT FLORIDA PROFESSIONAL SURVEYOR AND MAPPER N0. 3983 JOB NO. 080021 DATE No. REVISION '�i rA Lots 5, 6, 7, 8, 13 and 14, Block 7, REVISED MAP OF CLEARWATER BEACH, according to the plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 11, Page 5, of the Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida. The above described parcel contains 0.60 acres, more or less. OOD ZOO INFORMA T THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY APPEARS TO LIE WITHIN FLOOD ZONE "X" PER FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP 120112 0195 D MAP REVISED: SEPTEMBER 3, 1992 IN 01111 fflAij 0,01FIffil NO ml�' SURVEY INFORMATION PROVIDED BY A SIGNED & SEALED SURVEY BY: EDWARD C. ELLIOTT FLORIDA PROFESSIONAL SURVEYOR AND MAPPER NO. 3983 DA TED: 7123108 SECT�GN 5 TOWNSHW 29 S, RANGE 15 UVY OF CLEARWATER M11 �.CU�IIY �wi�'. / �� ;dC�� pa� � ~�n j �� Ahk:n .1 ' �•� � ' I, =Wmul� �:1 r F1 I I I U) z rn G LEN DALE ST Q ROYAL WAY D g Q rn z HEILWOOD ST Q LU Q AVALON ST Q D ~ z w CT o D z TE7 G a- ILL KENDALL ST rn JUANITA WAY C1 -n 33 C rn BAY ESPLANADE BAY ESPLANADE rn b Z rn 03 rn U)0 r D Z O m i Revisions: No. Date DescrIp Eionj ;'SITE". DATA EXIST. CONTOUR 8 NEW ELEVATION +10.00 .._._... .:.EXISTING ...(E), ........... . .........,_ PROPOSED ., ._( P{...._ ,.. 4,.,... ...... .,.,,.,,., ......> :�.,:REQUIRED NEW UNDERDRAIN N' EXIST. SAN. SEWER s NEW SAN. SEWER EXIST. WATER SERVICE Y TOURIST NEW INLET TOURIST NEW SAN. MANHOLE TOURIST ZONING: ®0® NEW BUILDING AREA :. NEW ASPHALT C NEW CONCRETE C TEMP. SILT BARRIER POINT OF CONNECTION zL OF NEW UTILITY TO EXIST. M METER B. F. P. D. BACKFLOW PREVENTION DEVICE RESORT FACILITY HIGH HYDRANT ASSEMBLY RESORT AC! ITY HIGH RESORT FACILITY HIGH LAND USE: T. &V. TAP AND VALVE { 15 OVERNIGHT ACCOM. 9 RESIDENTIAL UNITS F: 74 OVERNIGHT ACCOMODATIONS 3 O. K. USAGE: 14 FRACTIONAL UNITS 26, 076 S.F. 26, 076 20,000 S.F. LOT AREA: 0.60 AC. 0.60 AC. ' E 3 SINGLE FAMILY *30 UNITS —BASE DENSITY DENSITY: ATTACHED DWELLINGS r 58 UNITS FROM RESERVED POOL a 50 U.P.A. ' = 88 ROOMS BUILDING COVERAGE: 8,210 S.F. 20,908 S.F. N/A (S.F. & % OF GROSS SITE) , 37.7% 80% z FRONT: TO BLDG.: 10.8'(S) 10'(N) s^ 15 i BLDG. TO PVMT.: 0'(S) 0'(N) 3 ..__ ._- .... _..:........._ _._ ..... . SETBACKS: SIDE: 8.20'(W) 60.54'(E) a TO BLDG.: 5'(W) 5'(E) 5'(E)5 10' I TO PVMT.: 5'(W) 5'(E) 5'(E) ( REAR: j 2.1 , TO BLDG.: 5'(S) ti 10, a TO PVMT.: 51(S) , I I BLDG HEIGHT: 1 & 2 STORY ;! 74' -4 " TO TOP OF 75' PRECAST PLANK AT ROOF PAVED VEHICULAR USE AREA: :j y (V. U. A.) _ 818 S.F. i! 525 S.F. A IMPERVIOUS SURFACE RATIO: 2,96,1 S.F. 21,850 S.F. F (I.S.R.) 0.11 0.83 •95 OPEN SPACE: ' 23,115 S.F. 4,226 S.F. OS (S.F. & % OF GROSS SITE) ' w g9% iI 17% PARKING LOT INTERIOR LANDSCAPING:' N/A N/A N/A (S.F. & % OF V.U.A.) 2 a _ = -- 94 SPACES 1 SPACE 11 UNIT PARKING: 100% VALET 88x1 — 8 PARKING CALCULATIONS: 88 ROOMS x 1 SP. /ROOM = 88 REQUIRED 194 SPACES PROVIDED * BASE DENSITY— 50 U.P.A: X .60 AC.= 30 POOL DENSITY— 100 U.P.A. X .60 i AC.= 60(ALLOWED) 58(USED) rn b Z rn 03 rn U)0 r D Z O m i ®R, r Mfiz MIGPIAL C I� s 'Ft ss i7f" ' �x16`T -GO} .. Drawn HES Comm.: 08 �,. 1 issue ®ate: I I Revisions: No. Date DescrIp Eionj EXIST. ELEVATION 01 12G109 EXIST. CONTOUR 8 NEW ELEVATION +10.00 NEW CONTOUR ME= l® ®1®® EXIST. STORM SEWER IA NEW STORM SEWER � NEW UNDERDRAIN N' EXIST. SAN. SEWER �w. �,...�,m •» NEW SAN. SEWER EXIST. WATER SERVICE NEW WATER SERVICE ® m" ® Em NEW INLET NEW SAN. MANHOLE 9Y'I• „rINVn't4• NEW CLEAN— OUT(C.O,) ®0® NEW BUILDING AREA C NEW ASPHALT C NEW CONCRETE C TEMP. SILT BARRIER POINT OF CONNECTION zL OF NEW UTILITY TO EXIST. M METER B. F. P. D. BACKFLOW PREVENTION DEVICE F.H.A. FIRE HYDRANT ASSEMBLY F.D.C. FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTION T.B.0. TEMPORARY BLOW —OFF T. &V. TAP AND VALVE ®R, r Mfiz MIGPIAL C I� s 'Ft ss i7f" ' �x16`T -GO} .. Drawn HES Comm.: 08 �,. 1 issue ®ate: I I Revisions: No. Date DescrIp Eionj �I 01 12G109 City Comments 8 04/OG/09 Drc Comments 0 05/13/09 Drc Comments IA N' { i K 0 9Y'I• „rINVn't4• ;O y r. z\ 0 11 ti. ww YY _ yr A� h W" R-T THIS DRAWING IS', Ip�STRU��lT� VICE NC.SHALL*REMAIN THE PROPERTY OF THE ENGINEER, AND, SHAD" NOT $E NZPRODUCED, PUBLISHED (i& USED IN ANY WAY WITHOUT THE CONSENT OF ;THLf , EN G E� R.t4 4 47 A 3A' 6 OPYFtGHT 2009 NOT PUBLISHED N -' � •;;ray:.. , _�-�� ; . . •� MAY 13 2009 P.E'.447431 Cbr?IES PF THESE,;IPLANS ARE- NOT VALID UNLESS EMBOSS, o'ImTH THE.. SIGNING ENGINEER'S SEAL I iif}l�ei.YY'. N' K 9Y'I• „rINVn't4• P� y r. 11 ti. ww YY _ yr I iif}l�ei.YY'. l`S9Mo oti'Lalud12. / MGMH 88ME ONE 1. DURING CONSTRUCTION SEDIMENT IS TO REMAIN ON SITE. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE INSTALLATION OF EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL DEVICES PRIOR TO INITIATING AND DURING ALL PHASES OF LAND CLEARING AND CONSTRUCTION TO PREVENT SOIL EROSION AND SILTATION. 2. THE RETENTION AREAS SHALL BE ROUGH GRADED PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION, WITH ALL STORM WATER DIRECTED TO IT AFTER COMPLETION OF ALL WORK, REMOVE DEBRIS AND SILTATION FROM THE BOTTOM OF THE RETENTION BASIN, AND FINE GRADE THE FINAL SIX (6) INCHES AND SOD. CONTRACTOR TO MAINTAIN THE SIDE SLOPE REQUIRED AND SHOWN ON PLAN, AND NOTIFY ENGINEER FOR AN INSPECTION PRIOR TO SODDING, J. THE RETENTION -AREAS AND OUTFALL CONTROL STRUCTURES SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED EARLY IN THE CONSTRUCTION PERIOD TO MITIGATE ANY ADVERSE WATER QUANTITY IN PARTS OFF SITE. 4. AFTER COMPLETION OF THE PROJECT THE OWNER WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE OF THE STORMWATER FACILITIES, ACTIONS INCLUDED SHALL BE REGULAR MOWING OF THE BOTTOM AND SIDE SLOPES, PLUS PERIODIC INSPECTIONS AND REMOVAL OF DEBRIS, TRASH, ETC. THAT MAY BLOCK THE OPENINGS IN THE CONTROL STRUCTURES. 5. ALL DISTURBED CONDITIONS SHALL BE RESTORED TO NATURAL CONDITIONS OR BETTER. 6. ALL SIDE SLOPES OF RETENTION OR SWALE AREAS SHALL BE STABILIZED BY VEGETATION OR OTHER MATERIALS TO MINIMIZE EROSION AND PROTECT THE STORMWATER BASIN. NOTE: PLAN CONFLICTS, SHOWN OR UNSHOWN, WITH OTHER EXISTING SITE IMPROVEMENTS SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO MAKE ADJUSTMENTS AND PROTECT OR REINSTALL ALL DISTURBED EXISTING UTILITIES, PHONE LINES, POWER LINES, POWER SUPPORT CABLES, SPRINKLER LINES AND CONTROLS, MECHANICAL PIPELINES OR UNDERGROUND POWER CABLES AND RETURN EXISTING CONCRETE WALKS, DUMPSTER PADS, FENCE, HANDRAIL, VALVES, HYDRANTS, GUY WIRES, ELECTRIC BOXES AND PIPELINES WHICH SHALL BE REPAIRED OR REINSTALLED AS INCIDENTAL TO THE COST OF WORK SHOWN HEREUNDER. IT SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO RESOLVE ANY CONFLICTS PRIOR TO AWARD OF THE CONTRACT. NOTE' REQUIRED EROSION CONTROL MEASURES MUST REMAIN INTACT THROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTION. FAILURE TO INSTALL OR PROPERLY MAINTAIN THESE BARRICADES WILL RESULT IN ENFORCEMENT ACTION WHICH MAY INCLUDE CITATIONS, AS PROVIDED BY CHAPTERS 4OD -4 & 4OD -40 F.A.C. CAN RESULT IN A PENALTY NOT TO EXCEED $10,000 PER OFFENSE WITH EACH DATE DURING WHICH SUCH VIOLATION OCCURS CONSTITUTING A OFFENSE. MROATHSANGE AND 1pffllams OPEDIONS ADD MEN VETO OWN= MEN 1. ALL SODDED AREAS SHALL BE MOWED AND MAINTAINED PROPERLY. 2. UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCES SHALL THE RETENTION AREA BE FILLED WITH ANY OTHER SUBSTANCE THAN STORMWATER. 3. SWALE AREAS SHALL BE KEPT CLEAN AND FREE OF ANY OBSTRUCTIONS. 4. IF DAMAGE TO THE SYSTEM DOES OCCUR, THE SYSTEM SHALL BE RECONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE APPROVED PLAN. THE OWNER SHALL PERIODICALLY MONITOR THE STORMWATER SYSTEM (PIPE CONVEYANCE SYSTEM AND RETENTION POND) FOR SILT AND SEDIMENTATION BUILD UP. THE PIPE CONVEYANCE SYSTEM SHALL BE FLUSHED, AS DEEMED NECESSARY NO LESS THAN TWICE A YEAR. ALL MATERIAL SHALL BE COLLECTED DOWNSTREAM AND REMOVED. THE RETENTION POND SHALL BE KEPT MOWED AND THE BOTTOM FREE OF DEBRIS, IF WATER STANDS IN THE POND MORE THAN 48 HOURS THE OWNER SHALL RAKE AND /OR SCARIFY THE POND BOTTOM, AS DEEMED NECESSARY AND NO LESS THAN TWICE A YEAR TO RESTORE THE PERCOLATION CHARACTERISTICS OF THE POND. THE OWNER WILL BE RESPONSIBLE TO MAKE SURE THAT TO THE BEST OF HIS ABILITY NOTHING ENTERS THE SYSTEM BESIDES STORMWATER THAT COULD DETERIORATE THE FUNCTIONING CAPABILITIES OF THE SYSTEM, I.E GASOLINE, OIL, GREASE, CHEMICALS, ETC. THE POND UNDERDRAIN SYSTEM SHALL BE INSPECTED ANNUALLY AND RETROFITTED AND FLUSHED SEMI- ANNUALLY. CLOGGED OR SPENT FILTER MATERIAL SHALL BE DISPOSED OF IN ALL MANNERS AS WITH THE HANDLING OF HAZARDOUS WASTE. THE SPENT FILTER MATERIAL SHALL BE DISPOSED OF IN A PERMITTED FACILITY. END 10 RUN 501VAIM DONTRU MOVES 1. SEDIMENT TRAPPING MEASURES: SEDIMENT BASINS AND TRAPS, PERIMETER BERMS, FILTER FENCES, BERMS, SEDIMENT BARRIERS, VEGETATIVE BUFFERS AND OTHER MEASURES INTENDED TO TRAP SEDIMENT AND /OR PREVENT THE TRANSPORT OF SEDIMENT ONTO ADJACENT PROPERTIES, OR INTO EXISTING WATER BODIES, MUST BE INSTALLED, CONSTRUCTED OR, IN THE CASE OF VEGETATIVE BUFFERS, PROTECTED FROM DISTURBANCE, AS A FIRST STEP IN THE LAND ALTERATION PROCESS. SUCH SYSTEMS SHALL BE FULLY OPERATIVE AND INSPECTED BY THE ENGINEER BEFORE ANY OTHER DISTURBANCE OF THE SITE BEGINS. 2. PROTECTION OF EXISTING STORM SEWER SYSTEMS: DURING CONSTRUCTION, ALL STORM SEWER INLETS IN THE VICINITY OF THE PROJECT SHALL BE PROTECTED BY SEDIMENT TRAPS SUCH AS SECURED HAY BALES, SOD, STONE, ETC., WHICH SHALL BE MAINTAINED AND MODIFIED AS REQUIRED BY CONSTRUCTION PROGRESS, AND WHICH MUST BE APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER BEFORE INSTALLATION. J. SEDIMENTATION BASIN: THE CONTRACTOR WILL BE REQUIRED TO PROHIBIT DISCHARGE OF SILT THROUGH THE OUTFALL STRUCTURE DURING CONSTRUCTION OF ANY RETENTION AREA AND WILL BE REQUIRED TO CLEAN OUT THE RETENTION AREA BEFORE INSTALLING ANY PERMANENT SUBDRAIN PIPE. IN ADDITION, PERMANENT RETENTION AREAS MUST BE TOTALLY CLEANED OUT AND OPERATE PROPERLY AT FINAL INSPECTION AND AT THE END OF THE WARRANTY PERIOD. 4. SWALES, DITCHES AND CHANNELS: ALL SWALES DITCHES AND CHANNELS LEADING FROM THE SITE SHALL BE SODDED WITHIN (3) DAYS OF EXCAVATION. ALL OTHER INTERIOR SWALES, ETC., INCLUDING DETENTION AREAS WILL BE SODDED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY. 5. PROTECTION AND STABILIZATION OF SOIL STOCKPILES. FILL MATERIAL STOCKPILES SHALL BE PROTECTED AT ALL TIMES BY ON -SITE DRAINAGE CONTROLS WHICH PREVENT EROSION OF THE STOCKPILED MATERIAL. CONTROL OF DUST FROM SUCH STOCKPILED MATERIAL, MAY BE REQUIRED, DEPENDING UPON THEIR LOCATION AND THE EXPECTED LENGTH OF TIME THE STOCKPILES WILL BE PRESENT. IN NO CASE SHALL UNSTABILIZED STOCKPILE REMAIN AFTER THIRTY (30) CALENDAR DAYS. 6. MAINTENANCE: ALL EROSION AND SILTATION CONTROL DEVICES SHALL BE CHECKED REGULARLY, ESPECIALLY AFTER EACH RAINFALL AND WILL BE CLEANED OUT AND /OR REPAIRED AS REQUIRED. MUEN MEMO SPEDUOMMIAS THE FILTER SAND SHALL BE WASHED MATERIAL MEETING F.D.O.T ROAD AND BRIDGE SPECIFICATIONS FOR SILICA SAND AND QUARTZ GRAVELS, OR MIXTURES THEREOF (LESS THAN ONE (1) PERCENT SILT CLAY AND ORGANIC MATTER), UNLESS FILTER CLOTH IS USED WHICH IS SUITABLE TO RETAIN THE SILT CLAY AND ORGANIC MATTER WITHIN THE FILTER; CALCIUM CARBONATE AGGREGATE IS NOT AN ACCEPTABLE SUBSTITUTE; AND HAVE AN EFFECTIVE GRAIN SIZE OF 0.20 TO 0,55 MILLIMETERS IN DIAMETER; A UNIFORMITY COEFFICIENT OF 1.5 OR GREATER. RATE OF 0. 125 CM /SEC. OR GREATER. lF THE PERMEABILITY RATE OF THE FILTER SAND IS LESS THAN 0. 125 CM /SEC. A REPLACEMENT OF THE FILTER SYSTEM WILL BE REQUIRED AT THE CONTRACTORS EXPENSE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL HAVE THE SAND TESTED AND APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT THE CONTRACTOR HAVE THE FILTER SAND TESTED AND APPROVED. 2. THE PERFORATED PIPE SHALL CONSIST OF POLYVINYL CHLORIDE (PVC) CONFORMING TO ASTM D 3033, HAVE MINIMUM OF SIXTEEN (16) 318 INCH DIAMETER PERFORATIONS PER LINEAR FOOT OF PIPE AND BE ON THE BOTTOM 135' OF THE PIPE. J. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE DEWATERING MEASURES AS REQUIRED DURING THE INSTALLATION OF THE UNDERDRAIN AND ALL OF ITS COMPONENTS. 4. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT BACKFILL THE DRAIN PIPE UNTIL THE ENGINEER HAS VERIFIED AND APPROVED THE DRAIN PIPE GRADES AND INSTALLATION OF FILTER MEDIA. 5. SWFWMD REQUIRES AS -BUILT CERTIFICATION BY THE ENGINEER FOR THIS FILTER SYSTEM, TEST REPORTS FROM AN APPROVED LABORATORY ON GRADATION AND PERMEABILITY SHALL BE INCLUDED IN THE AS -BUILT SUBMITTAL. WaRo al RE MDUDD M Of HNS I. PRIOR TO ANY SITE CLEARING, ALL TREES SHOWN TO REMAIN ON THE CONSTRUCTION PLANS SHALL BE PROTECTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LOCAL REGULATORY AGENCY'S TREE ORDINANCE AND DETAILS CONTAINED IN THESE PLANS. IT SHALL BE THE CONTRACTORS RESPONSIBILITY TO MAINTAIN THESE TREES IN GOOD CONDITION. NO TREES SHOWN TO REMAIN SHALL BE REMOVED WITHOUT WRITTEN APPROVAL FROM THE 2. THE CONTRACTOR IS TO PREPARE THE SITE PRIOR TO BEGINNING ACTUAL CONSTRUCTION IN ACCORDANCE, WITH THE SOILS TESTING REPORT COPIES OF THE SOILS REPORT ARE AVAILABLE THROUGH THE OWNER OR THE SOILS TESTING COMPANY, QUESTIONS REGARDING SITE PREPARATION REQUIREMENTS DESCRIBED IN THE SOILS REPORT ARE TO BE DIRECTED TO THE SOILS TESTING COMPANY. J. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CLEAR AND GRUB, ONLY THOSE PORTIONS OF THE SITE, NECESSARY FOR CONSTRUCTION. DISTURBED AREAS WILL BE SEEDED, MULCHED, OR PLANTED WITH OTHER APPROVED LANDSCAPE MATERIAL IMMEDIATELY FOLLOWING CONSTRUCTION. 4. THE TOP 4" TO 6" OF GROUND REMOVED DURING CLEARING AND GRUBBING SHALL BE STOCKPILED AT A SITE DESIGNATED BY THE OWNER TO BE USED FOR LANDSCAPING PURPOSED, UNLESS OTHERWISE DIRECTED BY THE OWNER. M E=@ EM mmummiul 2DVES [18071 5. ALL CONSTRUCTION DEBRIS AND OTHER WASTE MATERIAL SHALL BE DISPOSED OF OFF -SITE IN ACCORDANCE WITH APPLICABLE REGULATIONS. ONLY "GRADING BY HAND" IS PERMITTED WITHIN THE CANOPY LINE OF TREES THAT ARE TO REMAIN. 6. THE CONTRACTOR IS TO OBTAIN ALL NECESSARY PERMITS FOR REMOVING ANY EXISTING STRUCTURES, 7 IT IS THE CONTRACTORS RESPONSIBILITY TO NOTIFY ALL UTILITY COMPANIES TO DISCONNECT OR REMOVE THEIR FACILITIES PRIOR TO REMOVING OR DEMOLISHING. 8. THE CONTRACTOR WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR MAKING A VISUAL INSPECTION OF THE SITE AND WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE DEMOLITION AND REMOVAL OF ALL UNDERGROUND AND ABOVE GROUND STRUCTURES THAT WILL NOT BE INCORPORATED WITH THE NEW FACILITIES, SHOULD ANY DISCREPANCIES EXIST WITH THE PLANS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CALLING THE OWNER AND REQUESTING A CLARIFICATION OF THE PLANS PRIOR TO DEMOLITION. 9. DURING CONSTRUCTION, ALL STORM SEWER INLETS IN THE VICINITY OF THE PROJECT SHALL BE PROTECTED BY SEDIMENT TRAPS SUCH AS SECURED HAY BALES, SOD, STONE, ETC. WHICH SHALL BE MAINTAINED AND MODIFIED AS REQUIRED BY CONSTRUCTION PROGRESS. 10. ALL EROSION AND SILTATION CONTROL METHODS SHALL BE IMPLEMENTED PRIOR TO THE START OF CONSTRUCTION AND MAINTAINED UNTIL CONSTRUCTION IS COMPLETE. 11. WHEN CONSTRUCTION IS COMPLETED, THE RETENTION /DETENTION AREAS WILL BE RESHAPED, CLEANED OF SILT, MUD AND DEBRIS, AND RE- SODDED IN ACCORDANCE TO THE PLANS. 12. CONTRACTOR IS TO PROVIDE EROSION CONTROL /SEDIMENTATION BARRIER (HAY BALES OR SILTATION CURTAIN) TO PREVENT SILTATION OF ADJACENT PROPERTY, STREETS, STORM SEWERS, WATERWAYS, AND EXISTING WETLANDS. W, ilrlI11�STEM I m � l f: PF, 1. ALL WATER MAINS SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM OF 36 INCHES OF COVER. 2. ALL WATER SYSTEM WORK SHALL CONFORM WITH LOCAL REGULATORY STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS. J. ALL DUCTILE IRON PIPE SHALL BE CLASS 52 IN ACCORDANCE WITH ANSI A 21.50 (AWWA C 150) AND ANSI A 21.31 (AWWA C 151) AND PIPE SHALL RECEIVE EXTERIOR BITUMINOUS COATING IN ACCORDANCE WITH ANSI A 21.6, A 21.8 OR A 21.51 AND SHALL BE MORTAR LINED, STANDARD THICKNESS, AND BITUMINOUS SEALED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ANSI A 21.6 (AWWA C 104 -71). 4. ALL FITTINGS LARGER THAN 2" SHALL BE DUCTILE IRON CLASS 53 IN ACCORDANCE WITH AWWA C - -1 10 WITH A PRESSURE RATING OF 350 PSI. JOINTS SHALL BE MECHANICAL JOINTS IN ACCORDANCE WITH AWWA C -1 1 1. FITTINGS SHALL BE CEMENT MORTAR LINED AND COATED IN ACCORDANCE WITH AWWA C -104. 5. ALL PVC WATER MAINS 4" THROUGH 12" SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH AWWA C -900. PIPE SHALL BE CLASS 15FO AND MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF SDR 18 IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM D -2241. 5. WATER MAIN PIPING OF LESS THAN 4" SHALL BE PER ASTM D2241 -89. 7. ALL FITTINGS 2" AND SMALLER SHALL BE SCHEDULE 40 PVC WITH SOLVENT WELDED SLEEVE TYPE JOINTS. 8. ALL GATE VALVES 2" OR LARGER SHALL BE RESILIENT SEAT OR RESILIENT WEDGE MEETING THE REQUIREMENTS OF AWWA C509. 9. ALL FIRE HYDRANTS SHALL MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF AWWA C502 AND SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE LOCAL UTILITY AND FIRE MARSHALL. 10. THE CONTRACTOR IS TO INSTALL TEMPORARY BLOW -OFFS AT THE END OF WATER SERVICE LATERALS TO ASSURE ADEQUATE FLUSHING AND DISINFECTION, 11. THRUST BLOCK!IVG SHALL BE PROVIDED AT ALL FITTINGS AND HYDRANTS AS SHOWN ON DETAILS. 12. MATERIALS AND CONSTRUCTION METHODS FOR WATER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LOCAL REGULATORY AGENCY CODES. 13. THE IRRIGATION SYSTEM SHALL HAVE PURPLE COLOR PIPING AND LABELING ON THE PIPE TO INSURE DIFFERENTIATION FROM POTABLE WATER PIPING. 1. ALL COMPONENTS OF THE WATER SYSTEM, INCLUDING FITTINGS, HYDRANTS, CONNECTION, Ai,.') VALVES SHALL REMAIN UNCOVERED UNTIL PROPERLY PRESSURE TESTED AND AC: -EPTED BY THE OWNER'S ENGINEER. PRESSURE TESTS TO BE IN ACCORDANCE W,'TH WATER DEPARTMENT SPECIFICATIONS. CONTRACTOR TO NOTIFY OWNERS ENGINEER.AND WATER DEPARTMENT INSPECTORS 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE OF PERFORMING TESTS. 2. NEW WATER MAINS AFTER COMPLETION OF INSTALLATION OF NEW WATER MAINS, PRESSURE TESTING SHALL BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LOCAL JURISDICTION WATER SYSTEM STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS. CONTRACTOR TO PERFORM CHLORINATION. SAMPLING OF NEW WATER MAINS SHALL CONFORM WITH COUNTY PUBLIC HEALTH UNIT REQUIREMENTS AND RESULTS FORWARDED TO THE ENGINEER. UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCES SHALL A NEW WATER SYSTEM BE PLACED INTO SERVICE UNTIL CERTIFICATION BY THE ENGINEER HAS BEEN COMPLETED AND A RELEASE FROM COUNTY PUBLIC HEALTH UNIT HAS BEEN ISSUED. � f t .s r � 1. ALL SANITARY SEWER MAINS & LATERAL SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM OF 36 INCHES OF COVER. 2. ALL SANITARY SEWER MAINS & SERVICE LATERALS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED OF POLYVINYL CHLORIDE PIPE, SDR 35 OR AS OTHERWISE INDICATED ON THE CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS. J. ALL SANITARY SEWER WORK SHALL CONFORM WITH LOCAL REGULATORY STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS 4. PRIOR TO COMMENCING WORK WHICH REQUIRES CONNECTING NEW WORK TO EXISTING LINES OR APPURTENANCES, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY LOCATION AND ELEVATION OF EXISTING CONNECTION POINT AND NOTIFY OWNER'S ENGINEER OF ANY CONFLICTS OR DISCREPANCIES. 5. PVC PIPE AND FITTINGS SHALL CONFORM TO ASTM SPECIFICATIONS DESIGNATION D- 3034 -77C, MA SDR 35. INSTALLATION OF SDR 35 PIPE SHALL BE IN STRICT ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF ASTM SPECIFICATION SECTION D2321. ALL SANITARY SEWER PIPELINES SHALL BE SOLID GREEN IN COLOR. 6. ALL PVC FORCE MAINS SHALL BE CLASS 2000, SDR 21, COLOR GREEN, WITH A GREEN MAGNETIC TAPE A MINIMUM OF 2" WIDE, PLACED 1 FOOT BELOW THE PROPOSED GRADE THE PRINTING ON THE MAGNETIC TAPE SHOULD READ FORCEMAIN ". 7. ALL DUCTILE IRON PIPE SHALL BE CLASS 52 IN ACCORDANCE WITH ANSI A 21.50 (AWWA C 150) AND ANSI A21.51 (AWWA C 151). DUCTILE IRON PIPE SHALL RECEIVE INTERIOR AND EXTERIOR BITUMINOUS COATING IN ACCORDANCE WITH ANSI A21.6, A21.8, ORA21.51. 8. ALL SANITARY SE!^.'ER GRAVITY MAINS OR SANITARY SEWER FORCEMAINS THAT REQUIRE D.I.P. ARE TO BE POLYLINED OR EPDXY LINED. 9. ALL SANITARY SEWER COVERS SHALL BE TRAFFIC RATED FOR HS -20 LOADING. SOME SEMEN TESTIN ME OpHyge H. ROOM SO 1. ALL GRAVITY SEWER PIPING SHALL BE SUBJECT TO A TELEVISION INSPECTION BY THE OWNER'S CONTRACTOR. CONTRACTOR TO NOTIFY THE ENGINEER 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE TO SCHEDU LE INSPECTION. 2. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PERFORM N A EXFILTRATION TEST N 0 ALL GRAVITY SEWERS INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REGULATION AGENCY HAVING JURISDICTION MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE LEAKAGE RATE • 100 GPD PER INCH PIPE DIAMETER PER MILE. TEST RESULTS ARE TO BE SUBMITTED TO THE REGULATORY AGENCY FOR APPROVAL. COORDINATION AND NOTIFICATION OF ALL PARTIES IS THE CONTRACTORS RESPONSIBILITY. 3 ALL FORCE MAINS SHALL BE SUBJECT TO A HYDROSTATIC PRESSURE TEST IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REGULATORY AGENCY HAVING JURISDICTION. SAID TESTS ARE TO BE CREATED BY THE ENGINEER OF RECORD AND SUBMITTED TO THE REGULATORY AGENCY FOR APPROVAL. COORDINATION AND NOTIFICATION OF ALL PARTIES IS THE CONTRACTORS RESPONSIBILITY. 62- 555.314 LOCATION_ OF PUBLIC WATER SYSTEM MAINS FOR THE PURPOSE OF THIS SECTION, THE PHASE "WATER MAINS" SHALL MEAN MAINS, INCLUDING TREATMENT PLANT PROCESS PIPING, CONVEYING EITHER RAW, PARTIALLY TREATED, OR FINISHED DRINKING WATER, FIRE HYDRANT LEADS, AND SERVICE LINES THAT ARE UNDER THE CONTROL OF A PUBLIC WATER SYSTEM AND THAT HAVE AN INSIDE DIAMETER OF THREE INCHES OR GREATER. (1) HORIZONTAL SEPARATION BETWEEN UNDERGROUND WATER MAINS AND SANITARY OR STORM SEWERS, WASTEWATER OR STORMWATER FORCE MAINS, RECLAIMED WATER PIPELINES, AND ON -SITE SEWAGE TREATMENT AND DISPOSAL SYSTEMS. (A) NEW OR RELOCATED, UNDERGROUND WATER MAINS SHALL BE LAID, TO PROVIDE A HORIZONTAL DISTANCE OF AT LEAST THREE FEET BETWEEN THE OUTSIDE OF THE WATER MAIN AND THE OUTSIDE OF ANY EXISTING OR PROPOSED STORM SEWER, STORMWATER FORCE MAIN, OR PIPELINE CONVEYING RECLAIMED WATER REGULATED UNDER PART Ill OF CHAPTER 62- 610,F.A.C. (B) NEW OR RELOCATED, UNDERGROUND WATER MAINS SHALL BE LAID TO PROVIDE A HORIZONTAL DISTANCE OF AT LEAST THREE FEET, AND PREFERABLY TEN FEET, BETWEEN THE OUTSIDE OF THE WATER MAIN AND THE OUTSIDE OF ANY EXISTING OR PROPOSED VACUUM -TYPE SANITARY SEWER. (C) NEW OR RELOCATED, UNDERGROUND WATER MAINS SHALL BE LAID TO PROVIDE A HORIZONTAL DISTANCE OF AT LEAST SIX FEET, AND PREFERABLY TEN FEET, BETWEEN THE OUTSIDE OF THE WATER MAIN AND THE OUTSIDE OF ANY EXISTING OR PROPOSED GRAVITY -OR PRESSURE -TYPE SANITARY SEWER, WASTEWATER FORCE MAIN, OR PIPING CONVEYING RECLAIMED WATER NOT REGULATED UNDER PART III OF CHAPTER 62 -610, F.A.C. THE MINIMUM HORIZONTAL SEPARATION DISTANCE BETWEEN WATER MAINS AND GRAVITY -TYPE SANITARY SEWERS SHALL BE REDUCED TO THREE FEET WHERE THE BOTTOM OF THE WATER MAIN IS LAID AT LEAST SIX INCHES ABOVE THE TOP OF THE SEWER. (D) NEW OR RELOCATED, UNDERGROUND WATER MAINS SHALL BE LAID TO PROVIDE A HORIZONTAL DISTANCE OF AT LEAST TEN FEET BETWEEN THE OUTSIDE OF THE WATER MAIN AND ALL PARTS OF ANY EXISTING OR PROPOSED 'ON -SITE SEWAGE TREATMENT AND DISPOSAL SYSTEM" AS DEFINED IN SECTION 381.0065(2), F.S., AND RULE 64E- 6.002, F.A.C. (2) VERTICAL SEPARATION BETWEEN UNDERGROUND WATER MAINS AND, SANITARY OR STORM SEWERS, WASTEWATER OR STORMWATER FORCE MAINS, AND RECLAIMED WATER PIPELINES. (A) NEW OR RELOCATED, UNDERGROUND WATER MAINS CROSSING ANY, EXISTING OR PROPOSED GRAVITY -OR VACUUM -TYPE SANITARY SEWER OR STORM SEWER SHALL BE LAID SO THE OUTSIDE OF THE WATER MAIN IS AT LEAST SIX INCHES, AND PREFERABLY 12 INCHES, ABOVE OR AT LEAST 12 INCHES BELOW THE OUTSIDE OF THE OTHER PIPELINE. HOWEVER, IT IS PREFERABLE TO LAY THE WATER MAIN ABOVE THE OTHER PIPELINE. i (B) NEW OR RELOCATED, UNDERGROUND WATER MAINS CROSSING ANY' EXISTING OR PROPOSED PRESSURE -TYPE SANITARY SEWER, WASTEWATER OR STORMWATER FORCE MAIN, OR PIPELINE CONVEYING RECLAIMED WATER SHALL BE LAID SO THE OUTSIDE OF THE WATER MAIN IS AT LEAST 12 INCHES ABOVE OR BELOW THE OUTSIDE OF THE OTHER PIPELINE. HOWEVER IT IS PREFERABLE TO LAY THE WATER MAIN ABOVE THE OTHER PIPELINE. (C) AT THE UTILITY CROSSING DESCRIBED IN PARAGRAPHS (A) AND (B) ABOVE, ONE FULL LENGTH OF WATER MAIN PIPE SHALL BE CENTERED ABOVE OR BELOW THE OTHER PIPELINE SO THE WATER MAIN JOINTS WILL BE AS FAR AS POSSIBLE FROM THE OTHER PIPELINE. ALTERNATIVELY, AT SUCH CROSSINGS, THE PIPES SHALL BE ARRANGED SO THAT ALL WATER MAIN JOINTS ARE AT LEAST THREE FEET FROM ALL JOINTS IN VACUUM -TYPE SANITARY SEWERS, STORM SEWERS, STORMWATER FORCE MAINS, OR PIPELINES CONVEYING RECLAIMED WATER REGULATED UNDER PART N OF CHAPTER 62 -610, F.A.C., AND AT LEAST SIX FEET FROM ALL JOINTS IN GRAVITY -OR PRESSURE -TYPE SANITARY SEWERS, WASTEWATER FORCE MAINS, OR PIPELINES CONVEYING RECLAIMED WATER NOT REGULATED UNDER PART 111 OF CHAPTER 62 -610, F.A.C. (3) SEPARATION BETWEEN WATER MAINS AND SANITARY OR STORM SEWER MANHOLES. (A) NO WATER MAIN SHALL PASS THROUGH, OR COME INTO CONTACT WITH, ANY PART OF A SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE. (B) EFFECTIVE AUGUST 28, 2003, WATER MAINS SHALL NOT BE CONSTRUCTED OR ALTERED TO PASS THROUGH, OR COME INTO CONTACT WITH, ANY PART OF A STORM SEWER MANHOLE OR INLET STRUCTURE. WHERE IT IS NOT TECHNICALLY FEASIBLE OR ECONOMICALLY SENSIBLE TO COMPLY WITH THIS REQUIREMENT (I.E., WHERE THERE IS A CONFLICT IN THE ROUTING OF A WATER MAIN AND A STORM SEWER AND WHERE ALTERNATIVE ROUTING OF THE WATER MAIN OR THE STORM SEWER IS NOT TECHNICALLY FEASIBLE OR IS NOT ECONOMICALLY SENSIBLE), THE DEPARTMENT SHALL ALLOW EXCEPTIONS TO THIS REQUIREMENT (I.E, THE DEPARTMENT SHALL ALLOW CONSTRUCTION OF CONFLICT MANHOLES), BUT SUPPLIES OF WATER OR PERSONS PROPOSING TO CONSTRUCT CONFLICT MANHOLES MUST FIRST OBTAIN A SPECIFIC PERMIT FROM THE DEPARTMENT IN ACCORDANCE WITH PART V OF THIS CHAPTER AND MUST PROVIDE IN THE PRELIMINARY DESIGN REPORT OR DRAWINGS, SPECIFICATIONS, AND DESIGN DATA ACCOMPANYING THEIR PERMIT APPLICATION THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION: (1) TECHNICAL OR ECONOMIC JUSTIFICATION FOR EACH CONFLICT MANHOLE. (2) A STATEMENT IDENTIFYING THE PARTY RESPONSIBLE FOR MAINTAINING EACH CONFLICT MANHOLE. (3) ASSURANCE OF COMPLIANCE WITH THE DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION REQUIREMENTS IN SUB - SUBPAWRAPHS A. THROUGH D. BELOW. (A) EACH WATER MAIN PASSING THROUGH A CONFLICT MANHOLE SHALL HAVE A FLEXIBLE, WATERTIGHT JOINT ON EACH SIDE OF THE MANHOLE TO ACCOMMODATE DIFFERENTIAL SETTING BETWEEN THE MAIN AND THE MANHOLE. H✓ST WITHIN ED IN AHWATTERTIGHTMCASING PIPE HAVING HIGH IMPACT STRENGTH (I.E., HAVING AI:N IMPACT STRENGTH I.E., HAVING AN IMPACT STRENGTH AT LEAST EQUAL TO THAT OF 0.25 - INCH -THICK DUCTILE IRON PIPE). (C) EACH CONFLICT MANHOLE SHALL HAVE AN ACCESS OPENING, AND SHALL BE SIZED, TO ALLOW FOR EASY CLEANING OF THE MANHOLE. (D) GRATINGS SHALL BE INSTALLED AT ALL STORM SEWER INLETS UPSTREAM OF FACH CONFLICT MANHOLE TO PREVENT LARGE OBJECTS FROM ENTERING THE MANHOLE. (4) SEPARATION BETWEEN FIRE HYDRANT DRAINS AND SANITARY OR STORM SEWERS, WASTEWATER OR STORMWATER FORCE MAINS, RECLAIMED WATER PIPELINES, AND ON -SITE SEWAGE TREATMENT AND DISPOSAL SYSTEMS NEW OR RELOCATED FIRE HYDRANTS WITH UNDERGROUND DRAINS SHALL BE LOCATED SO THAT THE DRAINS ARE AT LEAST THREE FEET FROM ANY EXISTING OR PROPOSED STORM SEWER, STORMWATER FORCE MAIN, OR PIPELINE CONVEYING RECLAIMED WATER REGULATED UNDER PART Ill OF CHAPTER 62 -610, F.A.C., AT LEAST THREE FEET, AND PREFERABLY TEN FEET, FROM ANY EXISTING OR PROPOSED VACUUM -TYPE SANITARY SEWER, AT LEAST SIX FEET AND PREFERABLY TEN FEET, FROM ANY EX +STING OR PROPOSED GRAVITY OR PRESSURE -TYPE SANITARY SEWER, WASTEWATER FORCE MAIN, OR PIPELINE CONVEYING RECLAIMED WATER NOT REGULATED UNDER PART Ill OF CHAPTER 62 -610, F.A.C. AND AT LEAST TEN FEET FROM ANY EXISTING OR PROPOSED ON -SITE SEWAGE TREATMENT AND DISPOSAL SYSTEM' AS DEFINED IN SECTION 381.0065(2), F.S. AND RULE 64E - 6.002, F.A.C. (5) EXCEPTIONS, WHERE IT 1S NOT TECHNICALLY FEASIBLE OR ECONOMICALLY SENSIBLE TO COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS IN SUBSECTION (1) OR (2) ABOVE, THE DEPARTMENT SHALL ALLOW EXCEPTIONS TO THESE REQUIREMENTS IF SUPPLIES OF WATER OR CONSTRUCTION PERMIT APPLICANTS PROVIDE TECHNICAL OR ECONOMIC JUSTIFICATION FOR EACH EXCEPTION AND PROVIDE ALTERNATIVE CONSTRUCTION FEATURES THAT AFFORD A SIMILAR LEVEL OF REL14BILITY AND PUBLIC HEALTH PROTECTION. ACCEPTABLE ALTERNATIVE CONSTRUCTION FEATURES, INCLUDING THE FOLLOWING. (A) WHERE AN UNDERGROUND WATER MAIN IS BEING LAID LESS THAN THE REQUIRED MINIMUM HORIZONTAL DISTANCE F, OM ANOTHER PIPELINE AND WHERE AN UNDERGROUND WATER MAIN IS CROSSING ANOTHER PIPELINE AND JOINTS IN THE WATER MAIN ARE BEING LOCATED LESS THAN THE REQUIRED MINIMUM DISTANCE FROM JOINTS IN THE OTHER PIPELINE. (1) USE OF PRESSURE -RATED PIPE CONFORMING TO THE AMERICAN WATER WORKS ASSOCIATION STANDARDS INCORPORATED INTO RULE 62- 555.330, F.A.C., FOR THE OTHER PIPELINE IF IT IS A GRAVITY -OR, VACUUM - TYPE PIPELINE. (2) USE OF WELDED, FUSED, OR OTHERWISE RESTRAINED JOINTS FOR EITHER THE WATER MAIN OR THE OTHER PIPELINE. (3) USE OF WATERTIGHT CASING PIPE OR CONCRETE ENCASEMENT AT LEAST FOUR INCHES THICK FOR EITHER THE WWATER MAIN OR THE OTHER PIPELINE. (B) WHERE AN UNDERGROUND WATER MAIN IS BEING LAID LESS THAN THREE FEET HORIZONTALLY FROM ANOTHER PIPELINE AND WHERE AN UNDERGROUND WATER MAIN IS CROSSING ANOTHER PIPELINE AND IS BEING LAID LESS THAN THE REQUIRED Q ED M INIMUM VERTICAL DISTAN CE FROM THE OTHER PIPELINE. PQUALSTO OF THA PIPE, OR PIPE, DUCTILE IRONPPPESOR CO C1ltl7t ENCASEMENT IMPACT T LESTRENGTH ST FOUR AT THICK FOR THE WATER MAIN, AND ) (2 ) USE OF PIPE, OR CASING PIPE, HAVING HIGH IMPACT STRENGTH (I.E., HAVING AN IMPACT STRENGTH AT LEAST EQUAL TO THAT OF 0.25 - INCH -THICK DUCTILE IRON PIPE) OR CONCRETE ENCASEMENT AT LEST FOUR INCHES THICK FOR THE OTHER PIPELINE IF IT IS NEW AND IS CONVEYING WASTEWATER OR RECLAIMED WATER. P??I�l A, 1144 1. ALL DELETERIOUS SUBSTANCE MATERIAL, (I.E. MUCK, PEAT BURIED DEBRIS), IS TO BE EXCAVATED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THESE PLANS, OR AS DIRECTED BY THE OWNERS ENGINEER, OR OWNERS SOIL TESTING COMPANY. DELETERIOUS MATERIAL IS TO BE STOCKPILED OR REMOVED FROM THE SITE AS DIRECTED BY THE OWNER. EXCAVATED AREAS ARE TO BE BACKFILLED WITH APPROVED MATERIALS AND COMPACTED AS SHOWN ON THESE PLANS. 2. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PROTECTING EXCAVATING AGAINST COLLAPSE AND WILL PROVIDE BRACING, SHEETING, OR SHORING, AS NECESSARY, TRENCHES SHALL BE KEPT DRY WHILE PIPE AND APPURTENANCES ARE BEING PLACED. DEWATERING SHALL BE USED AS REQUIRED. J. ALL STORM SEWER PIPE SHALL BE REINFORCED CONCRETE CLASS Ill (ASTM C -76) UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED ON PLANS 4. PVC STORM PIPE, 12" AND SMALLER SHALL CONFORM TO AWWA C -900, CLASS 150 STANDARDS, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 5. ALL DRAINAGE STRUCTURE GRATES AND COVERS WITHIN TRAFFIC AREAS SHALL BE TRAFFIC RATED FOR HS -20 LOADINGS. 5. THE CONTRACTOR IS TO SOD THE RETENTION /DETENTION POND AS INDICATED ON PLANS WITHIN ONE WEEK FOLLOWING CONSTRUCTION OF THE POND. 7 MATERIALS L AND CONSTRUCTION METHODS FOR R 0 STREETS AND STORM DRAINAGE CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LOCAL REGULATORY AGENCY. 8. ALL STORM STRUCTURES SHALL BE GROUTED TO THE INVERT ELEVATION(S) OF THE STORM PIPES(S). STORM PIPE SHALL BE SAW -CUT EVEN WITH THE STRUCTURE WALL(S). GROUT AROUND PIPES FOR WATER TIGHT AND SMOOTH FINISH. pfful0m, M090.2 0 MORE ORE VEMM Min o 3PECTIO N DEQUIREME I. THE STORM DRAINAGE PIPING AND FILTRATION SYSTEM SHALL BE SUBJECT TO A VISUAL INSPECTION BY THE OWNERS SOILS ENGINEER PRIOR TO THE PLACEMENT OF BACKFILL. 2. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN THE STORM DRAINAGE SYSTEMS UNTIL FINAL ACCEPTANCE OF THE PROJECT J. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR COORDINATING THE APPLICABLE TESTING WITH THE SOILS ENGINEER. TESTS WILL BE REQUIRED PURSUANT WITH THE TESTING SCHEDULE FOUND IN THE ENGINEERING CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS. UPON COMPLETION OF THE WORK, THE SOILS ENGINEER MUST SUBMIT CERTIFICATIONS TO THE OWNER'S ENGINEER STATING THAT ALL REQUIREMENTS HAVE BEEN MET f lymacyalls RESPO 3111196 MOVE IT IS THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO PERFORM A SURVEY (ACCOMPANIED BY THE ARCHITECT AND OWNER) OF THE ENTIRE PROJECT AREA INCLUDING BUILDING(S) AND SITE IMMEDIATELY UPON OCCUPYING THE WORK AREA AND BY PHOTOGRAPHIC AND WRITTEN CORRESPONDENCE DETAILING ANY AREAS THAT ARE NOT IN A FIRST CLASS CONDITION (SURFACES THAT ARE UNBROKEN, NON- CRACKED, NON- RUSTING, WITHOUT CHIPS, WITHOUT SPLINTERS, OF TEXTURE MATCHING ITS SURROUNDING, WITH NEW APPEARING FINISHES, AND OPERATING AS ORIGINALLY DESIGNED OR INTENDED TO OPERATE) WHICH WILL REMAIN IN THEIR PRESENT CONDITION AT THE CONCLUSION OF THE PROJECT THE CONTRACTOR WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PROVIDING THE OWNER A COMPLETE PROJECT IN FIRST CLASS CONDITION MEETING INDUSTRY WIDE STANDARDS IN QUALITY AND PERFORMANCE THROUGHOUT THE ENTIRE PROJECT AREA BUILDING(S) AND SITE (REGARDLESS OF WHETHER AN AREA IS SPECIFICALLY IDENTIFIED WITHIN THE DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS OR NOT) UNLESS A PARTICULAR AREA HAS BEEN DESCRIBED IN THE AFOREMENTIONED PHOTOGRAPHS AND WRITTEN DETAILS. CONTRACTOR HAS THE RESPONSIBILITY TO PROTECT THE EXISTING BUILOING(S) UTILITIES AND SITE THROUGHOUT THE PROJECT TIME FRAME. SHOULD, DURING THE COURSE OF THE WORK, ANY AREA OF THE BUILDING(S) AND /OR UTILITIES AND /OR THE BUILOING(S) AND /OR UTILITIES AND /OR THE SITE BECOME DAMAGED AND THAT AREA WAS NOT SPECIFICALLY CALLED OUT TO BE A PART OF THE CONSTRUCTION, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR AND /OR REPLACE THE DAMAGED AREA TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE ARCHITECT AND OWNER AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO THE OWNER. WATER SUPPLY SANITARY SEWER STORM SEWER NATURAL AND LP GAS LINES ELECTRICAL POWER RECLAIMED WATER SUPPLY IRRIGATION LINES T V. CABLES FIBER OPTIC CABLES TELEPHONE CABLES FIRE ALARM SYSTEM CABLES SECURITY WIRING CONTROL WIRING SITE UNDERGROUND MECHANICAL SYSTEMS INCLUDING INSULATION IT WILL BE THE CONTRACTORS RESPONSIBILITY TO DETERMINE THE SPECIFIC LOCATION OF THE UNDERGROUND SERVICES BY CAREFUL HAND EXCAVATION ONLY UNLESS OTHER MEANS ARE APPROVED BY ARCHITECT AND OWNER BEFORE BEGINNING THE WORK. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPLACE OR REPAIR, PER SPECIFICATIONS, ANY AND ALL DAMAGED UNDERGROUND SERVICES AS LISTED ABOVE AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO THE OWNER. 1. TRENCH EXCAVATION - INCLUDE OSHA STANDARD 29 CFR, SECTION 1925.650 SUBPART P, WHICH IS NOW A PART OF LAWS OF FLORIDA CHAPTER 90 -96. - THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE WRITTEN ASSURANCE OF COMPLIANCE WITH THIS LAW. - A SEPARATE COST ITEM IDENTIFYING THE COST OF COMPLIANCE. - A TRENCH SAFETY SYSTEM SHALL BE DESIGNED BY THE CONTRACTOR, AND APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER. 2. ALL RETENTION AREAS, STORM SEWER PIPING, STORM SEWER STRUCTURES, ETC. MUST BE IN PLACE AS PART OF THE FIRST PHASE OF CONSTRUCTION, IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO ACCOMMODATE POSITIVE DRAINAGE THROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTION TO AVOID FLOODING OF THE ADJACENT PROPERTIES, ANY FLOODING THAT MAY OCCUR DUE TO HIS WORK WILL BE THE SOLE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR 3. THE USE OF ELECTRONICALLY STORED DATA IS INTENDED FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY AND NOT TO BE USED FOR CONSTRUCTION. CONTRACTOR MUST UTILIZE SIGNED AND SEALED DOCUMENTS FOR CONSTRUCTION. PIECE NOTES 1. PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTING CONCRETE PAVEMENT THE CONTRACTOR IS TO SUBMIT A PROPOSED JOINTING PATTERN TO THE OWNER'S ENGINEER FOR APPROVAL. 2. THE CONTRACTOR IS TO PROVIDE A 112" BITUMINOUS EXPANSION JOINT MATERIAL WITH SEALER, AT ABUTMENT OF CONCRETE AND ANY STRUCTURE. J. ALL PAVEMENT MARKINGS SHALL BE MADE WITH TRAFFIC PAINT IN ACCORDANCE TO FOOT STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS 971 -12. PARKING STALL STRIPING TO BE 4" WIDE PAINTED WHITE STRIPES. 4. THE CONTRACTOR IS TO INSTALL EXTRA BASE MATERIAL WHEN THE DISTANCE BETWEEN THE PAVEMENT ELEVATION AND THE TOP OF THE PIPE OR BELL IS LESS THAN TWELVE (12) INCHES. 5. STANDARD INDEXES REFER TO THE LATEST EDITION OF FOOT 'ROADWAY AND TRAFFIC DESIGN STANDARDS, " 6. PAVEMENT IN THE PROPERTY SHALL CONSIST OF I -1/2" ASPHALT TYPE S -3, ON 6" LIMEROCK BASE COMPACTED TO 989 OF MAXIMUM DENSITY, ON SUB -BASE COMPACTED TO 989 OF MAXIMUM DENSITY PER AASHTO T -180, 7 PAVEMENT IN R.O.W. SHALL CONSIST OF 2" ASPHALT, TYPE S -I ON 8" LIMEROCK BASE COMPACTED TO 989 OF MAXIMUM DENSITY, ON 10 -112" SUB -BASE STABILIZED TO 40 LBR AND COMPACTED TO 989 OF MAXIMUM DENSITY PER AASHTO T -180. ,I. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE CERTIFIED RECORD DRAW- INGS, SIGNED AND SEALED BY A PROFESSIONAL LAND SUR /EYOR. THE RECORD DRAWINGS SHALL SHOW FINAL GRADES FOR RETENTION BASIN(S), CONTROL STRUCTURE(S), INLETS & PIPES WITH TOP & BOTTOM ELEVATIONS, INVERTS & DIMENSIONING OF SLOT & BAFFLE. LOCATIONS OF ALL UT'LITIES INCLUDING THE SANITARY SEWER AND WATER PIPING, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE TWO COPIES OF THE CERTIFIED RECORD DRAWINGS TO THE ENGINEER. THE AFOREMENTIONED RECORD DRAWING SHALL BE SUFFICIENT ENOUGH IN DETAIL TO BE ACCEPTABLE BY AGENCIES HAVING JURISDICTION, GERRRM cousTflucyllp NOTES 1. ALL THE WORK PERFORMED SHALL COMPLY WITH THE REGULATIONS AND ORDINANCES OF THE VARIOUS GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES HAVING JURISDICTION OVER THE WORK. 2. ALL ELEVATIONS ARE REFERENCED FROM NATIONAL AMERICAN VERTICAL DATUM 1988. J. LOCATIONS, ELEVATIONS, AND DIMENSIONS OF EXISTING UTILITIES, STRUCTURES, AND OTHER FEATURES ARE SHOWN ACCORDING TO THE BEST INFORMATION AVAILABLE AT THE TIME OF PREPARATION OF THESE PLANS, THE CONTRACTOR WILL VERIFY THE LOCATIONS, ELEVATIONS, AND DIMENSIONS OF ALL EXISTING UTIL ITIES, STRUCTURES AND OTHER FEATURES AFFECTING THIS WORK PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. 4. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CHECK THE PLANS FOR CONFLICTS AND DISCREPANCIES PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE OWIVER S ENGINEER OF ANY CONFLICTS OR DISCREPANCIES BEFORE PERFORMING ANY WORK IN THE AFFECTED AREA. 5. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL EXERCISE EXTREME CAUTION IN AREAS OF BURIED UTILITIES, AND SHALL PROVIDE AT LEAST 48 HOURS NOTICE TO THI VARIOUS UTILITY COMPANIES, IN ORDER TO PERMIT MARKING THE LOCATIONS OF EXISTING UNDERGROUND UTILITIES, IN ADVANCE OF CONSTRUCTION, BY CALLING 'SUNSHINE" AT 1 -800- 432 -4770 MINIMUM OF 2 DAYS AND MAXIMUM OF 5 OHYS PRIOR TO THE START OF CONSTRUCTION. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR CONTACTING ALL UTILITIES NOT INCLUDED IN THE SUNSHINE" PROGRAM. 6. CONTRACTOR IS SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR CONSTRUCTION SAFETY, SPECIAL PRECAUTIONS MAY BE REQUIRED IN THE VICINITY OF POWER LINES AND OTHER UTILITIES. 7 ALL UNDERGROUND UTILITIES MUST BE IN PLACE AND TESTED AND INSPECTED PRIOR TO BASE AND SURFACE CONSTRUCTION. 8. IT IS THE CONTRACTORS RESPONSIBILITY TO BECOME FAMILIAR WITH THE PERMIT AND INSPECTION REQUIREMENTS OF THE VARIOUS GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN ALL NECESSARY PERMITS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION, AND SCHEDULE INSPECTIONS ACCORDING TO AGENCY INSTRUCTION. CONTRACTOR SHALL PAY ANY FINE IMPOSED BY ANY AGENCY. 9. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT FOR APPROVAL TO THE OWNERS ENGINEER; SHOP DRAWINGS ON ALL PRECAST AND MANUFACTURED ITEMS FOR THIS SITE. FAILURE TO OBTAIN APPROVAL BEFORE INSTALLATION MAY RESULT hV REMOVAL AND REPLACEMENT AT THE CONTRACTORS EXPENSE. ALL SHOP DRAWINGS ARE TO BE REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE CONTRACTOR PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL TO THE OWNERS ENGINEER. 10, AT LEAST THREE (3) WORKING DAYS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE ENGINEER AND APPROPRIATE AGENCIES, AND SUPPLY THEM WITH ALL REQUIRED SHOP DRAWINGS, THE CONTRACTOR'S NAME, STARTIN3 DATE, PROJECTED SCHEDULE, AND OTHER INFORMATION AS REQUIRED. AIJY WORK PERFORMED PRIOR TO NOTIFYING THE ENGINEER, OR WITHOUT AGENCY INSPECTOR PRESENT, MAY BE SUBJECT TO REMOVAL AND REPLACEMENT AT THE CONTRACTOR'S EXPENSE. 11. BACKFILL MATERIAL SHALL BE SOLIDLY TAMPED AROUND PIPES IN C" LAYERS UP TO A LEVEL OF AT LEAST ONE FOOT ABOVE THE TOP OF THE PIPE IN AREAS TO BE PAVED, BACKFILL SHALL BE COMPACTED TO 1009 MAXIMUM DEIISITY AS DETERMINED BY AASHTO T -99. 12. SITE WORK CONCRETE SHALL HAVE A COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH OF AT LEAST 3,000 P.S.I. IN 28 DAYS, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 13. ALL PRIVATE AND PUBLIC PROPERTY AFFECTED BY THE WORK SHAL,'_ BE RESTORED TO A CONDITION EQUAL TO OR BETTER THAN EXISTING CONDITIONS UNLESS SPECIFICALLY EXEMPTED BY THE PLANS. ADDITIONAL COSTS ARE INCIDENTAL TO OTHER CONSTRUCTION AND NO EXTRA COMPENSATION IS TO BE AL,:OWED. 14. ALL DISTURBEO -AREAS WHICH ARE NOT TO BE SODDED, ARE TO B1 SEEDED AND MULCHED i'0 DOT STANDARDS, AND MAINTAINED UNTIL A SATISFACTORY STAND OF GRASS, ACCEPTABLE TO THE REGULATORY AGENCY AND ENGINEER (-IF RECORD, HAVE BEEN OBTAINED. ANY WASHOUTS, REGRADING, RESEEDING, AND G&ISSING WORK, AND OTHER EROSION WORK REQUIRED, WILL BE PERFORMED BY TH,_ CONTRACTOR, AT HIS EXPENSE, UNTIL THE SYSTEM IS ACCEPTED FOR MAINTENANCE, BY THE REGULATORY AGENCY AND ENGINEER OF RECORD. 15. THE SOILScNGINEER lS TO SUPPLY THE ENGINEER WITH A PHOTOCOPY OF ALL COMPACTION TESTS, AND ASPHALT RESULTS, THE SOILS ENGINEER IS TO CERTIFY TO THE ENGINEER OF RECORD, IN WRITING, THAT ALL TESTING REQUIREMENTS, REQUIRED BY THE LOCAL REGULATORY AGENCY, AND THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (FOOT), FOR THE IMPROVEMENTS, AS REQUIRED BY THE ENGINEERING CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS, HAVE BEEN SATISFIED. 16, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN A COPY OF THE APPROVED PLANS AND PERMITS AT THE CONSTRUCTION SITE 17 THESE DRAWINGS DO NOT INCLUDE NECESSARY COMPONENTS FOR CONSTRUCTION SAFETY. THE CONTRACTOR IS SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR MEANS APID METHODS FOR CONSTRUCTION SITE SAFETY. 18, ALL SODDING, SEEDING AND MULCHING SHALL INCLUDE WATERING AND FERTILIZATION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR MAINTAINING THESE AREAS UNTIL THE PROJECT IS COMPLETED AND ACCEPTED BY THE OWNER. 19. ALL PIPE I F_NGTHS ARE PLUS OR MINUS. PIPE MEASUREMENTS ARE CENTER TO CENTER OF STRUCTURES OR FITTINGS. PIPE MEASUREMENTS FOR MITERED END SECTIONS ARE TO END OF PIPE. 20, EXISTING PAVEMENT SHALL BE SAW -CUT WHERE NEW PAVEMENT IS TO BE ADDED OR EXISTING PAVEMENT TO BE ELIMINATED. 21. ADJUSTMENTS OF INLETS, 'JUNCTION BOXES, MANHOLE TOPS, WATER VALVES, WATER METERS, ETC., SHALL BE INCLUDED IN THE CONTRACTORS BID AND NO CLAIM SHALL BE MADE AGAINST THE OWNER OR ENGINEER FOR THESE AD1.'USTMENTS, IF REQUIRED. 22. ALL BACKFILL OVER ANY PIPE (STORM SEWER, SANITARY SEWER, OP WATERLINES) THAT IS INSTALLED UNDER ROADWAYS OR WITHIN THE EMBANKMENT OF THE ROADWAY, SHALL BE COMPACTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH F.D.O.T STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS, SECTION 125 -8.3, LATEST EDITION. 23. THE CONTRACTOR PERFORMING TRENCH EXCAVATION, IN EXCESS OF 5' FEET IN DEPTH, SHALL COMPLY WITH THE OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMIN'STRARON S (OSHA) TRENCH EXCAVATION SAFETY STANDARDS, 29 C.F.R., S. 1926.550, SUBPART P, INCLUDING ALL SUBSEQUENT REVISIONS OR UPDATES TO THE STANDARDS AS ADOPTED BY THE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND EMPLOYMENT SECURITY (DLES). 24. CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE THE POINTS OF CONNECTIONS OF THE UTILITIES WITH DIFFERENT SUBS, SITE CONTRACTOR TO CONSTRUCT THE UNDERGRO,ND INFRASTRUCTURES ;.e. SANITARY SEWER, STORM SEWER, WATER LINES, FIRE LINES, EIC., TO 5' OUTSIDE OF THE BLOG(S), THE PLUMBING CONTRACTOR TO CONNECT AND PEET THE INVERT ELEVATIONS OF THE SAID UTILITIES. ANY UTILITY WORK PERFORMED 'WITHIN 5' OF THE BLDG. SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE PLUMBING CONTRACTOR. ALL WORK SHALL COMPLY WITH ALL APPLICABLE FEDERAL, STATE, AND LOCAL !:ODES, ORDINANCES AND REQUIREMENTS. 25. ALL WORK SHALL BE PERFORMED AND FINISHED IN A WORKMANLIKE MANNER TO COMPLETE SATISFACTION OF THE ARCHITECT /ENGINEER IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE BEST RECOGNIZED TRADE PRACTICES. 26. DEVIATIONS TO THESE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS WITHOUT CONSEN ' OF THE ENGINEER MAY BE CAUSE FOR THE WORK TO BE UNACCEPTABLE. DEVIATIONS SHALL RECEIVE WRITTEN APPROVAL FROM THE ENGINEER. 27. SIGNS, BUFFER WALLS & FENCES ARE SUBJECT TO SEPARATE SUBMITTAL(S) AND PERMITTING. DEVIATIONS SHALL RECEIVE WRITTEN APPROVAL FROM THE ENGINEER. I ®' i '��t�t N:ttttr1t �� A ': Gn,.'Jp. , \ Issue Date: 11/13/0 Revisions: No. Date Description QI %!m 21 I C= R� 9 4"!�' E,. tta Vu ,. . r q L. 0 � � 2� . .„ 1, .. U I ®' i '��t�t N:ttttr1t �� A ': Gn,.'Jp. , \ Issue Date: 11/13/0 Revisions: No. Date Description QI 01 126109 City Comments 8 04/OG/09 Drc Comments A 05/13/09 Drc Comments 0 . .„ 1, .. ,t� µ eKtYi<ksoL:'. '. rvuAgw* XJ ,10. �v'Aml- ;...1,..: 0 � &.,,a T ; .,., 0 ,.; 3I + 1� ;-; 0 i r 0 Ng ktAWi W1,14 I ' 0 ,zn k ".. ":. : u I 61 I -i, t! . r- _.:. �d �wnmrt $iX.xr,klf! uNJUY!141�k Ys+WGiA4 5 � �Si(x14NW1 �a i THIS DRAWING AN' IIJ+aCRUf�ENf Iu"ail D•SHALL•,VEMAIN THE PROPERTY OF THE ENGINEER, ANr,SHALL�TIOT REL20DUCED, LISHED OR USED IN ANY WAY WITHOUT THE CONSENT Of THEE 0W� 19* ,- (L�CQPYf�GHT 2009 NOT PUBLISHED .. , ;.. s F t10 47491 �AT o' .� Zp09 4 -- '.,h �` • N w� 1 CO'P EC§ OF'-THESE :PL:AfJS'ARE NOT VALID UNLESS EM3OSSEp ,WIT14iTHE,SIGNING- ENGINEER'S SEAL f '_ r; l ,; -- -u ,,Vf•. ,«::.AN'+,IiH4em5n I s.. ",,o,,,- .",:rnie.m z _:.. M 9 ..... . .„ 1, .. ,t� µ eKtYi<ksoL:'. '. rvuAgw* XJ ,10. �v'Aml- ;...1,..: � &.,,a T ; .,., ,.; 3I + 1� ;-; i r Ng ktAWi W1,14 I ' ...,1 ,zn k ".. ":. : u I 61 I -i, t! . r- _.:. ;.In I 1, i - 1r. k.prN :.. ^': .... , 11 ar."F'� $ljlr ....w..i_w T.B.M. U1,- ly. NAIL &DISK I . IN PAVEMENT ELEV. = 4.52 r AVALON ST. . EYllSJ 9a9:YJ W3iY. �l :a W111 ra.�'•". Y1i51 sLF�.:i I;att9 @aTr figs also 4+le±l aasu'i LLIa: h:ii�u =6 kw my A MA U:a I rcP� 111]1 a u we w" am E?e711 mm WA mm P,M, att�l WIA 'w Sra LiA Iwa ut a I= 6'� p am ImA 11" Ema Lm ma wal mu amn ILm IWA am tr3YPd ask `' '"�• i ;: ; • \, I+ ! r -;f , . i ' 9 .c - _ '&ld8 6 J}Y Cva Es S11 fGa 0151 4l'1 ICYd un. 3 v�"sd 4L I(ln l5a f:£Y hYd t&5 f+"Ya '639 iS,Y,' 0 t3L w m u 153 Eg iw im aN to 44 5.9 is r.:U will IiH 4e5 BILI fh'C 61a -'wk IJa W1 6ia b£7 � 618 toil G¢ uv '4$ fi�5 6M i4➢ {&I.CLi CL!•�9 m1 81g GS 6111 IS6 051 ®a hFA 16Y_iILL IL°i tai Cp3 fLH SJ! It}/ i29 IG7 Li i�•7Cb �N� Yuli '1�..61I Lt8 IY8 C�5 iC3 fC! Otfl t`..1 tdt 1'n tJ' F9a 699 d9 tlAi � 1'16 EJ L'fs` ti� A'�ii I&u tl� !LY C� �7'- 133 ,Ifp1 x'07 v. AdP I j� N 90 00 00 E M :,200. °`00M) spill 111111p 111!11�1111111 �l i v r,� I W I El I I I 91 ,fj •o � i I I L,q I o I I TEMPORARY SILT BARRIER (TYP.) j �Efi trT i I t W .pppiE 4 f 6' WOOD FENC PP I n -,• , N �Q" �' -' 'I•, •' 1•s - �\ VYae3t3L'f691Y,61r:!t�lL ras+xw�maimnna S I ' i '; I , % J oz� N 89 5 4's M' tt 100.0% (M TEMPORARY SILT I ' -11 4' CHAIN LINK FENCE BARRIER (TYP.) I; j 1 1 W r IS Q 1 a z W I T�,\ J I m I l„� < L 2 STORY co i f I u BUILDING 6 20 FLOOR ELEV. I i "11g _ o p 8.44 = I A/C ' t1 ISM C7F E/P I I 7LF� 5 - a E/P p a CILI I 1 ;Y cf) f� WATER METER a dal ® ®I III p� & CHECK VALVE 'll hj SA w L -J Ill I -- — --, LU - J POLE v�rn 3 ASPH. PVMT Wrf P� -rrs 6�I 5id1 w: � Is,a lfs9 a4 u.�6 •e I ~ I \�\b' T. B. M. L9915,91,9 0i G k(>I / � `0 $ a9 IV0. 00 (M) r NAIL & DISK \ r IN PAVEMENT 6 ELEV. = J.97 WO am, aqZ ;"a a0at ti3:A I= YYv.'�. pIm e-ma t" U la 8m L+618n 0112 9fiW uaj "im tID"..d" f+t'_`".6 am \u2-J InS� raw 64!62 11m9 ItLAd! Win WIM Imm so m" 4fa6 m rArt 2m um '9= .m C<1918 Im m W Bm am um wej 69aY ti6dd ma nu wa 683tl mm VA" lati0' mm 6m kol "jo ma w' m "u F+61B9 =a p ° ® r , •. -1 ;(;111 _i /4' f ; Ah NOTE: SILT FENCE SHALL NOT BE TRENCHED IN WHERE ADJACENT TO TREES DESIGNATED TO REMAIN. THE SILT FENCE MUST BE SECURED THROUGH THE PLACEMENT OF FILL OVER THE LOWER LIP OF THE THE LOWER LIP OF THE BARRICADE. �-- -- 6' MAX. –i MIN. 18 �. ''�`' `.t ",<`••> ;. C %cr< > Ax II 1 18.111 I If, HJj;lff IJ. )fK ,fly�f} { N� • ,FI)lt I I POST OPTIONS. 2'W' OR 2.5'DIAM. WOOD; 1.JJLBS. 1FT. MIN. STEEL FILTER FABRIC IN CONFORMANCE WITH SEC. 985 F. D.O, T. SPECS, OR EQUAL EXIST GROUND PRINCIPAL POST OPTIONAL j— POSITION, CANTED POSITION 20' TOWARD FLOW >� '---FILTER FABRIC SILT FLOW EXIST. II11 =1111 II = 1111_ = 1111_ 1111 °lili = GROUND SILT BARRIER DETAIL N.T.S. DEMOLITION NOTES LEGEND REMOVE: =_1 CONCRETE ASPH. &BASE BUILDING DEMOLITION OF THE SITE INCLUDES THE REMOVAL /RELOCATION OF ALL EXISTING STRUCTURES WITHIN PROJECT AREA, PAVING AND BASE, UTILITY LINES (SANITARY SEWER, STORM PIPES, WATER LINES, POWER POLES, OVERHEAD AND UNDERGROUND POWER AND TELEPHONE CABLES, GAS LINES, TREES, SHRUBS, ETC.) AND IS NOT LIMITED TO WHAT'S SHOWN. 1❑ REMOVE CONCRETE PADS AND CONCRETE WALKS TO THE NEAREST EXPANSION JOINT. 0 REMOVE EX ASPHAL T AND BASE. J❑ REMOVE EX. STRUCTURE AND FOOTING. REMOVE EX. TREE. 5❑ REMOVE EX. FENCE AND GATE AND ASSOCIATED POSTS. 60 REMOVE EX. POWER POLE & POWER LINES. 70 REMOVE EX. WATER METER /CHECK VALVE. 8 ALL CAVITY & EXCAVATION RESULTING FROM REMOVAL OF TREES, SHRUBS, PI -ES, INLETS, GREASE TRAPS, SIGN, AND POLE BASE SHALL BE FILLED WITH APPROVED SUITABLE MATERIAL AND COMPACTED IN 12" LIFTS TO 959" OF MAX DENSITY. 9 OFF –SITE DISPOSAL OF STRUCTURES, UTILITIES AND CONSTRUCTION DEBRIS SHALL OCCUR IN SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL FACILITIES APPROVED BY F. D. E. P., AND PINELLAS COUNTY. NO TE. SILT FENCES AND EROSION CONTROL MEASURES MUST BE IN PLACE PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION AND BE MAINTAINED THROUGH THE PROJECT. "I ACKNOWLEDGE THE PLACEMENT & LOCATION ALL MEASURES THIS PLAN REQUIRES TO CONTROL TURBIDITY & EROSION FOR T IS SITE. THIS PLAN SHALL BE MADE AVAILABLE TO SITE CONTRACTOR" NOTE.• ASBESTOS SURVEY MAYBE REQUIRED PRIOR TO ANY DEMOLITION OR RENOVATIONS. CONTACT PINELLAS COUNTY AIR QUALITY AT 727 - 464 -4422 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, SH GHOVAEE) M R Cam' •, u ' 50 QK THIS DRAWING IS AN ENGINEER, AND SHAT THE CONSENT OF TF, 61 EtAMaA�. GOEL: Ph'D.. P COPIE EMI3 =2r {�l 7" Imo; ( i RUMAIN THE PROPERTY OF THE )R WED14 ANY WAY WITHOUT rRIG19 2009 NOT PUBLISHED Y� K • "me-2m 4 r 3 s } r , 11 f k f ; Ah T. B. M. NAIL & DISK IN PAVEMENT ELEV. = 4.52 --- @ 0 U.M. NAIL & DISK IN PAVEMENT ELEV. = 3.97 ®AL ST. • f� NEW 4' DECORATIVE CONC.— r` N 90'00'0 I TRASH ENCLOSURE ON T CONCRETE PAD Iizl I 5 I I ! I 4 Y0. ROLL-OUT o f I ! (2) BOLLARDS i DUMPS Q) ER '9 °p Lu i I I ON 3 SIDE i I O O v 00 ' �o j i 12' OPENING I I? ? `n I I FOR SERVICE I W I li J In STR`PED � 4 i r TYP.) 25' i O pA 00 Em N 89 5C1 -�3g48 , 18' 24' 18' NEW L-Li RETENTION rVAULT (3) �.. . O r �.,. 26.92' 5' ! 5' �� :; ,' 6 antc>nxranasrrR_ 30 � j n , - - - - '- -- -N 89 59'39 W (M) /Vo. 00'(M) 20'X20' SIGHT VISIBILITY TRIANGLES (TYP,) KENDALL T® r �g 1,"&'YLVn51 I I ! ! i i I i i I , 1 C /VOTES. - VERTICAL CLEAR. HEIGHT FOR PARKING GARAGE H/C VAN ACCESSIBILITY SHALL BE 8' -2" WHICH INCLUDES ENTRANCE, ROUTE, PARKING SPACE & EXIT. - VERTICAL CLEAF - HEIGHT FOR VEHICULAR & PEDESTRIAN AREAS FOR ALL LEVELS OF THE PARKING GARAGE OTHER THAN VAN ACCESSIBILITY PARKING SHALL BE MIN. 7' CLEAR HEIGHT. Issue Date: 11/13/08 Revisions: No. Date Description 01 01 /26/09 _ City Comments 8 041OG109 Drc Comments © 05/13/09 Drc Comments 0 1 0 0 , a i 0 i 0 y'- t C* f L k"v '1 :. all .11.11) LMA I� c"J M r - L, vs� 4' r:s SCALE: 1 " =20' ra AA MAI AA // r THIS DRAWING IS AN INS T \k,.SER,I CE -ANDS,�p,LLrREMAINr�HE PROPERTY OF THE ENGINEER, AND SHALL ERRO lE �U L1S11D;i0R. USED tiIN ANY WAY WITHOUT THE CONSENT OF THE �hy; �� . (OGOP�YRIGHT 2009 NOT PUBLISHED NV 3 20 i I a '+ u, t, a 1 1 z x. a i i y'- t C* f a TOP EL IA r 51- I T B. M. NAIL & DISK IN PAVEMENT ELEV. = 4, 52 --- , 12 RED LETTERS W/ A WHITE BACKGROUND NO PACKING 20 KENDALL ST. o 00 g GAL VANIZED METAL SIGN POST WITH 3/8" o HOLES DRILLED 0 ON I" CENTERS 0 FINISHED GROUND 0 0 0 0 0 1 'DROP �11, 3000 PSI CONC, 0 f 0 12" FDC SIGN DETAIL N.T.S. 0 T. B. M. NAIL & DISK IN PAVEMENT ELEV. = 3.97 PROVIDE DOOR Y• FOR ACCESSIBILITY TOP EL. 6.0 S. H. W. EL. 5.7 -• 18" - I 24, W. EL. 5.7 B, D. V. EL. 4.0 INV. EL. 6" GRAVEL 6" 5.5 ROCK ! 18" ! �' N `L 6" B. 0. V. EL. 3.0 IMPERVIOUS MEMBRANE 6' CONC. - NEW 6" PVC U.D. INV. EL. 2.0 SECTIN -S N.T.S. R. O. V F1 SECTION C -C N.T.S. SECTION - N.T.S. ft 14.7" 72' 29.4" ' %'•' 1 �• r NEW DOGHOUSE M.H. NEW TYPE 'C' INLET TOP EL. 5.4 Ti NEW TAP NEW TAP NEW FDC TOP EL 5 4 INV. EL. 1.4 & VALVE & VALVE GN INV. EL. 1.7 - - - ` ' 1 MU will 7c•8 a11fY 4„CrA G3:Ui 41aB dSaa was Idl, izw M'm iwi:1 li,4 S A14a Idw W" ::= Wm low ,M I= 1-1 JIM 651 63ie 3 �a wN mow Eai= am 07Ufe &.a 9�6 dsWS Nbllm a7,FtY fdYdli t,31, -�� ii :f;l, t' r ' NEW 10 L. F. OF 18 RCP Q 3.09 - 'LRUL7 iiS ilii E7& FSI i'r3 L-11 l"1! t1+1 f'A1 'lE3' ,;:8 ftititid FL+'S Eel YL°] 14 W1 `f I0 11A [1!Y i7A fr'3� 221 to S•Y. '."ill ka F3Y &J iu am &5 kq 14U 0-H ffl! 00.1 0 till fW 4U [a u H yl Im Jr. 6'a L' , M ''1 Utl I • @a C47` tTdl ,�31 w� �S 69 i57 W71 IU3 951 ® IL°l 6L1 � C6f Id{l C51 YYH i1i �d 811 651 til L&'i'SC, 'IfW E� 1^ul �i f5i 4fi � � t A h41 1W lift 6U1 nib in M to an 51U Bhl is aA ATi 1641 U n N M 0 4d !� L f; EX. FHA NEW 6" D.I.P.- . � - /.P_ --,-- - -- -- -- -� p - _..._._. NEW 57 L. F. OF - L 59 N DCVA W FHA NEW ®, . ® NEW STORM MH j TOP EL. i _ FDC - - - - -- INV. EL. 1.50 } uu16 u „now is ' ,- i,Pi;,. .;:��•: -- I i" I ` g - - -- - (SEE DETAIL •6 i I ) ® EX. INLET 7.1 TOP �L. 4,� INV. �L. l , � LU lit 4' I ® `\ ® ® ® N 00 C\4 I I1 I . C7 I I i , k �:NET 130 L. F. OF- Q5 I i If \ \\ I 6.3+ - ® 18 RCP 0.239 J i I NEW SWALE 6.6'x' -- -- q�,-®- _ ®�- '- - - - - - - ,l TEMPORARY SILT�-�--� i; ` \\ C 65 ®� NEW CONTROL STRUCTURE i I .1 BARRIER (TYP.) . it ti \\ (SEE DETAIL THIS SHEET) I z I Iii I NEW 30 L. F. OF !ki I 6 ' PVC U. D. @ 09 Zi 6. B 4. LlSJI I C.O. INV. �• - _ - - - - - - - - - - EL. 2.0 " V 895 -•�� ,wnrawum7m0Am0ua . x 18 a0rt:.9 s RARY SILT OPENING i I BARRIER (TYP.) IN WILL I 6.6 6.3 <<i id / A A MAINTANENCE DOOR IN <• WALL OF RETENTION j VAUL T ® rl D p J ! I NEW SWALE ; i * 6.6 -- R.L_ - -- 16 -5 - -- I �a NEW :0 q I RETENTION i` VAULT D. H. W. EL. 5.3 w t o ' BO T. EL. 4.0 o iL --- - - - - -- .Z - - -5.1 ---b-.27 ------ - - -- -�- - - - -- , j l I SLOT & SKIMMER DETAIL N.T.S. i At Terminal Manhole PLAN ELEV TOP ELEV, 5,J GREASE BAFFLE TO BE 114" THICK ALUMINt w /STAINLESS STEEL BOTTOM ELEV.: 4.5 SECTION E-E. CONTROL STRUCTURE Storrs Sewer Manhole 3' A Ring & Cover (See Index No. 204 C Shallow 0'- 4' Polyethylene Adjusinent Rini 3' -6' Concentric cone 'Flat cov Standard 4.1'- 6' on shallow manhol as 0' to Approved barrel 'joint seals J4' depth) are 'O-Rings' and 'Rain- Necks' 10' Two continuous rings at all 1 48' Max joints Steel reinforce'ient 'B' Min. 48' Max Or to suit pipe i � 5' min. wall thicl -ness ST® type II acid re:: istant A y cement 4000 p.s . I 2' joint in pile entry Grout fill opening with 1 (Typ.) non - shrink mortar 18' RCP 18' RCP P.V.C. pipe requires manhole adapter coupling by Flo Grout flow channel Control, Inc., or approved water stop coupling. SECTION A -A PRECAST STORM SEWER MANHOLE DETAIL CITY INDEX NO. 202; 1 OF 1 N.T.S. 1a C 6.(� GENERAL NOTE: ; t ® ® . IF THE PROPOSED PROJECT NECESSITATES INFRASTRUCTURE MODIFICATIONS TO . . . . _.. �1 REQUIREMENTS AND /OR SATISFY SITE SPECIFIC WATER CAPACITY &PRESSURE REQ /�1' 3�''gg" !A 3 Iva 00,(M) BY THE APPLICANT & AT THEIR EXPENSE. IFO�NDERGROUNDAWATER MAINS L &E EX. FHA HYDRANTS ARE TO BE INSTALLED, THE INSTALLATION SHALL BE COMPLETED & IN SERVICE PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION IN ACCORDANCE WITH FIRE DEPT. REQUIREMENTS. A B C Shallow 0'- 4' 4' Max 3' -6' 24' Max Standard 4.1'- 6' 6' Max 4' 30' Max Deep 6.1'- 10' 10' 4' 48' Max Deep 10,1'- 14' 14' 5' 48' Max 1a C 6.(� GENERAL NOTE: ; t ® ® . IF THE PROPOSED PROJECT NECESSITATES INFRASTRUCTURE MODIFICATIONS TO . . . . _.. �1 REQUIREMENTS AND /OR SATISFY SITE SPECIFIC WATER CAPACITY &PRESSURE REQ /�1' 3�''gg" !A 3 Iva 00,(M) BY THE APPLICANT & AT THEIR EXPENSE. IFO�NDERGROUNDAWATER MAINS L &E EX. FHA HYDRANTS ARE TO BE INSTALLED, THE INSTALLATION SHALL BE COMPLETED & IN SERVICE PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION IN ACCORDANCE WITH FIRE DEPT. REQUIREMENTS. ELEVA TION DATUM: N.A. V D 1988, BENCHMARK CITY OF CLEARWA TER "H -02 ". ELEV. = 5.2142 NOTES. 1. ALL OVERHEAD UTILITY & COMMUNICATION LINES TO BE PLACED UNDERGROUND. 2. NO LIGHT WITHIN 300 FEET SHALL BE VISIBLE OR EXTEND IN AREAS IDENTIFIED AS SEA TURTLE NESTING AREAS DURING THE NESTING SEASON OF MAY 1 -OCT, 31. S a a, A EV. 5.3 ss r SKIMMER )ETAIL) 4 OF SLOT 4.7 ;P _EV,: 2.0 J a Q c a ` y E s , 1 1 t k y Ai t i i I �,�r16YYYiYi!Fi` A I < _ . ♦ OR sue• THIS DRAWING I "AqN J ISTR ',�v�'L 7T QF•' yI� ANq'SHALL'REMAIN THE PROPERTY OF THE ENGINEER, AND NA LC N{?F,, IR P CEb yy��BL%HED OR USED IN ANY WAY WITHOUT THE CONSENT „'THE �IGINE0. ! • c ,t'Q�OPYRIGHT 2009 NOT PUBLISHED oil ` - f . _ _ MAY 00 RAiI -At'GO.EL, Ph:Q6,PIZ.,�AZ'43 Co F ES �'OF 'lHESB P NS'AR E •tJOT A/ID ,t�Y]hE EM OSSED WITH;'•TF SIGNING ENGINEW "SEAL i <j, Jt, s 1 ' 1 I;iGfi L`.IdG W3:5 t5t119 d11N ;lyjj} IrtSq F:li,9 P8rM9 HaXSS L.5Ytl1 110 6f974 Ch'Pd LNU "M ' B&D Rita "V Mal 4,dW wu kno aaa 6, a ' ua w i=11 k',liHl 110. iG401 6631E i®(S'6 kw Wki MAI v QW Well ftllw &l awW 11-4 td]i ll Wa 9= Ihf NIM k1a LIM dMA W20 Mid Wd &G. WA8 L%U =1 &W ZWM , 1657.'Nt Pak"! &W MAU • s EN ALL ST® P. ELEVA TION DATUM: N.A. V D 1988, BENCHMARK CITY OF CLEARWA TER "H -02 ". ELEV. = 5.2142 NOTES. 1. ALL OVERHEAD UTILITY & COMMUNICATION LINES TO BE PLACED UNDERGROUND. 2. NO LIGHT WITHIN 300 FEET SHALL BE VISIBLE OR EXTEND IN AREAS IDENTIFIED AS SEA TURTLE NESTING AREAS DURING THE NESTING SEASON OF MAY 1 -OCT, 31. S a a, A EV. 5.3 ss r SKIMMER )ETAIL) 4 OF SLOT 4.7 ;P _EV,: 2.0 J a Q c a ` y E s , 1 1 t k y Ai t i i I �,�r16YYYiYi!Fi` A I < _ . ♦ OR sue• THIS DRAWING I "AqN J ISTR ',�v�'L 7T QF•' yI� ANq'SHALL'REMAIN THE PROPERTY OF THE ENGINEER, AND NA LC N{?F,, IR P CEb yy��BL%HED OR USED IN ANY WAY WITHOUT THE CONSENT „'THE �IGINE0. ! • c ,t'Q�OPYRIGHT 2009 NOT PUBLISHED oil ` - f . _ _ MAY 00 RAiI -At'GO.EL, Ph:Q6,PIZ.,�AZ'43 Co F ES �'OF 'lHESB P NS'AR E •tJOT A/ID ,t�Y]hE EM OSSED WITH;'•TF SIGNING ENGINEW "SEAL i <j, Jt, s 1 f � A • s -= 1 P. 2- 1/2"x2- 1/2"x1/2" ANGLE 4 "x3/8 "4 ANCHOR STUD GRATE FRAME W /STUD. STEEL FRAME W/2 ANCHOR STUDS PER SIDE - EQUAL CENTERS, GALVANIZE AFTER FABRICATION ANCHOR STANDARD DETAIL 1-1/2" TYPE S -3 ASPHALT @ 1/4" - -- _ - _ • - - -- PER FT. MIN. - EXCEPT AS NOTED +' - -- illj ,I. ,1 `I I - -- 6„ LIMEROCK BASE F.D.O,T. CERTIFIED - COMPACTED TO 98% MAX. DENSITY SUBBASE STABILIZED 40 L.B.R. COMPACTED TO 98% MAX. DENSITY IN R.O.W. & DRIVEWAY SECTION N.T.S. PARKING BY DISABLED PERMIT ONLY $255 FINE F.S.® ®18.18 P/L CAST IRON RETICULINE SEE PLAN m GRATE, TRAFFIC TYPE 1 -1 /2 "R BELOW PAVEMENT EDGE OF WALK FIN. GRADE PRIOR 2' LEVEL (H -20 LOADING) W/2 SIDED NEW ASPHALT POSITIVE DRAINAGE (4:1 MAX) AND BASE 2" ANCHOR — — GRATE SEAT w I: 7 1 -1/2" RADIUS VERTICAL CURB AND SYMBOL l 8" CONIC. WALL NOTE: WHEN SIDEWALK IS 6„ - --- SEE FDOT INDEX 2U1 PAVING .- 4000 PSI Q BE ADDED, IT IS TO FOR EYE BOLT AND I 28 > JOINT. EXPANSION JOINTS CHAIN O 40' O.C. FOR 4' DAYS SIDEWALKS, 50' O.C. COMPACTED FOR 5' OR GREATER. FDOT "C" 2' -0" x 3' -1" Il l #4 X @12" O.C.E.W. SUBBASE M V ONLY CO — _ NOTE: 6' �'�' I ! 1. CUT PIPE FLUSH w /INSDE FACE OF I • CONTROL JOINTS WALL. $255 FINE Q 4'O.C., 5' O.C., 2. MORTAR BOTTOM TO WHITE 8' O.C., OR 12' O.C. MATCH INVERT OF INLET DETAIL OUTFALL PIPE. N.T.S. 1 1-1/2" TYPE S -3 ASPHALT @ 1/4" - -- _ - _ • - - -- PER FT. MIN. - EXCEPT AS NOTED +' - -- illj ,I. ,1 `I I - -- 6„ LIMEROCK BASE F.D.O,T. CERTIFIED - COMPACTED TO 98% MAX. DENSITY SUBBASE STABILIZED 40 L.B.R. COMPACTED TO 98% MAX. DENSITY IN R.O.W. & DRIVEWAY SECTION N.T.S. PARKING BY DISABLED PERMIT ONLY $255 FINE F.S.® ®18.18 P/L SEE PLAN PLACE SOD 1/2" BELOW PAVEMENT FIN. GRADE PRIOR NEW ASPHALT ' AND BASE TO SODDING POSITIVE DRAINAGE (4,1 MAX) MEET EX. , . ".., = , 1'A -�'r -� u. din,_ i �Ja6::a COMPACTED GROUND GROUND TRANSITION AT THE PROPERTY LINE N.T.S. PLACE SOD 1/2" BELOW PAVEMENT NEW ASPHALT FIN. GRADE PRIOR AND BASE TO SODDING POSITIVE DRAINAGE COMPACTED GROUND PLACEMENT OF SOD AT PAVEMENT N.T.S. P/L FINISH GRADE TO SEE PLAN PLACE SOD 1/2" 1 -1 /2 "R BELOW PAVEMENT EDGE OF WALK FIN. GRADE PRIOR 2' LEVEL TO SODDING NEW ASPHALT POSITIVE DRAINAGE (4:1 MAX) AND BASE MEET EX. — — COMPACTED GROUND P/L SEE PLAN PLACE SOD 1/2" BELOW PAVEMENT FIN. GRADE PRIOR NEW ASPHALT ' AND BASE TO SODDING POSITIVE DRAINAGE (4,1 MAX) MEET EX. , . ".., = , 1'A -�'r -� u. din,_ i �Ja6::a COMPACTED GROUND GROUND TRANSITION AT THE PROPERTY LINE N.T.S. PLACE SOD 1/2" BELOW PAVEMENT NEW ASPHALT FIN. GRADE PRIOR AND BASE TO SODDING POSITIVE DRAINAGE COMPACTED GROUND PLACEMENT OF SOD AT PAVEMENT N.T.S. ON SITE PARKING & DRIVEWAY SECTION N.T.S. ASPHALT @ 1/4" FINISH GRADE TO PER FT. MIN. r- EXCEPT AS NOTED =- ASPHALT PC -1 1/4" THICK 1 -1 /2 "R LIMEROCK BASE EDGE OF WALK F.D.O.T. CERTIFIED 2' LEVEL COMPACTED TO SHOULDER VARIES (SEE PLAN) 98% AASHTO T -180 MAX. DENSITY FINISH CONC. WALK SUBBASE COMPACTED TO WHITE BORDER 98% AASHTO T -180 MAX. DENSITY ON SITE PARKING & DRIVEWAY SECTION N.T.S. N.T.S. 6 5' 6' I SIGN WHEEL �. STOP EACH PARKING CONIC. WALK AMP RAM SPACE SHALL BE 11 DOWN DOWN CONSPICUOUSLY STRIPED IN BLUE AND WHITE PAINT, .W W AND SHALL BE POSTED M N AND MAINTAINED WITH A W 4- PERMANENT, ABOVE- GRADE SIGN BEARING 60• UJ THE INTERNATIONAL a SYMBOL OF ACCESSIBILLITY AND THE CAPTION SEE _ _I 12' 5' I 12' "PARKING BY DISABLED PERMIT ONLY I_' SITE PLAN SUCH SIGNS SHALL NOT BE OBSCURED BY A SYMBOL VEHICLE PARKED IN THE 6" 6" H I ~-I SPACE. ALL HANDICAPPED 1 1 - I--I y, PARKING SPACES MUST m� 3 BE SIGNED & MARKED 3� �m yl IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE STANDARDS 21T 2 ADOPTED BY THE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND A.D.A. HANDICAP PARKING STRIPING DETAIL N.T.S. EXIST. SURFACE SAW -CUT EXIST. EDGE OF PAVEMENT & BASE NEW SURFACE EXIST. BASE NEW BASE NEW SUBBASE PAVEMENT TRANSITION DETAIL N.T.S. F FILL GROUND AROUND BLDG. TO 3" BELOW FIN, FLOOR ELEVATION & SOD MAX. SLOPE 4:1 MIN. SLOPE 2% GROUND PREPARATION AT ALL BUILDINGS N.T.S. MEDIUM BROOM FINISH GRADE TO FINISH CONC. WALK 1 " BELOW 1 -1 /2 "R 1' BELOW EDGE OF WALK EDGE OF WALK 2' LEVEL MEDIUM BROOM SHOULDER VARIES (SEE PLAN) SHOULDER FINISH CONC. WALK 4" WHITE BORDER EXPANSION JOINT RAMP DETAIL I: 7 1 -1/2" RADIUS VERTICAL CURB AND SYMBOL 4" �� NOTE: WHEN SIDEWALK IS 6„ TO BE REMOVED & /OR PAVING COMPACTED FILL'' Q 4'0.C., 5' O.C., BE ADDED, IT IS TO BASE OR UNDISTURBED NEAREST EXPANSION & 1/2" BITUMINOUS JOINT. EXPANSION JOINTS SOIL O 40' O.C. FOR 4' 1 SERIES "C" SIDEWALKS, 50' O.C. COMPACTED FOR 5' OR GREATER. CONCRETE WALK DETAIL N.T.S. I, SUBBASE M V ONLY 1/2" BLACK NOTE: 3,000 PSI CONCRETE 6' �'�' I ! PROVIDE 1/4" 1.5" I • CONTROL JOINTS $255 FINE Q 4'O.C., 5' O.C., ALUMINUM WHITE 8' O.C., OR 12' O.C. & 1/2" BITUMINOUS BACKGROUND L° EXPANSION JOINTS 1 5. POST TO BE MADE OF Q 40' O.C. FOR 4' F.S. 318.18 SIDEWALKS, 50' O.C. GALVANIZED STEEL FOR 5' OR GREATER. CURB /WALK DETAIL N.T.S. 6 5' 6' I SIGN WHEEL �. STOP EACH PARKING CONIC. WALK AMP RAM SPACE SHALL BE 11 DOWN DOWN CONSPICUOUSLY STRIPED IN BLUE AND WHITE PAINT, .W W AND SHALL BE POSTED M N AND MAINTAINED WITH A W 4- PERMANENT, ABOVE- GRADE SIGN BEARING 60• UJ THE INTERNATIONAL a SYMBOL OF ACCESSIBILLITY AND THE CAPTION SEE _ _I 12' 5' I 12' "PARKING BY DISABLED PERMIT ONLY I_' SITE PLAN SUCH SIGNS SHALL NOT BE OBSCURED BY A SYMBOL VEHICLE PARKED IN THE 6" 6" H I ~-I SPACE. ALL HANDICAPPED 1 1 - I--I y, PARKING SPACES MUST m� 3 BE SIGNED & MARKED 3� �m yl IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE STANDARDS 21T 2 ADOPTED BY THE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND A.D.A. HANDICAP PARKING STRIPING DETAIL N.T.S. EXIST. SURFACE SAW -CUT EXIST. EDGE OF PAVEMENT & BASE NEW SURFACE EXIST. BASE NEW BASE NEW SUBBASE PAVEMENT TRANSITION DETAIL N.T.S. F FILL GROUND AROUND BLDG. TO 3" BELOW FIN, FLOOR ELEVATION & SOD MAX. SLOPE 4:1 MIN. SLOPE 2% GROUND PREPARATION AT ALL BUILDINGS N.T.S. I- E - -i i i 1 I I I- L i i- I Ln Ij I I ' [L_i f I_ -i I I I I I I4 „I SYMBOL SHALL BE 5 FT. HIGH & WHITE PAINT COLOR HANDICAPPED PAVEMENT SYMBOL N.T.S. 3 PLACE CONC. SLAB /WALK 4” BELOW FLOOR ELEV. EXCEPT AT DOORS REMAIN FLUSH. EXPANSION JOINT SLOPE AT 1/4" PER FOOT 10:1 MAX. SLOPE SOD NOTES: 1. PROVIDE 5'x5'x4" THICK CONC, SLAB ® ALL EMERGENCY EXITS. 2. CONFORM TO ABOVE DETAIL FOR PLACING WALKS AT THE BLDGS. PLACEMENT OF CONCRETE SLAB AT ALL BUILDINGS N.T.S. NEW BLDG. FIN. FL. GRADE cD� WATER MAIN OR STORM DRAIN 18" MIN. VERTICAL CLEARANCE — — SAN. SEWER rRAnF ROOF DRAIN I� FIN. GROUND I I I 5' UTILITY (i.e. SANITARY SEWER, WATER SERVICE, _ " "` • • FIRE LINE OR STORM DRAIN) BY SITE CONTRACTOR I I TO 5' FROM BLDG. UTILITY WITHIN 5' OF BLDG. BY PLUMBING CONTRACTOR. FINAL CONNECTION BY PLUMBING CONTRACTOR UNLESS OTHERWISE COORDINATED BY THE G,C, UTILITY CONNECTION AT ALL BUILDINGS N.T.S. - to 10 � z WATER MAIN OR STORM DRAIN D.I.P. IS USED IN PLACE OF P.V.C. FORA USED OF 10' EACH WAY + FROM CE OF WATER MAIN WHEN GRADE THE VERTICAL CLEARANCE BETWEEN�� WATER & SEWER MAINS IS 18' OR LESS. o z 18" OR MORE VERTICAL CL. WATER MIN - - I 10' MIN L . P.V.C. OR V.C.P. HORIZONTAL CLEARANCE A SAN. SEWER GRAVITY MAIN NOTE: CONCRETE ENCASEMENT OF STORM SEWER + SANITARY SEWER GRAVITY OR SAN. SEWER MAIN IS NOT PERMITTED. GRAVITY MAIN VERTICAL CLEARANCE HORIZONTAL CLEARANCE WATER MAIN & SANITARY SEWER CLEARANCES N.T.S. MEDIUM BROOM '[ FINISH CONC. WALK FINISH GRADE TO 1 -1 /2 "R 1' BELOW BLUE EDGE OF WALK 2' LEVEL 2' LEVEL SHOULDER VARIES (SEE PLAN) SHOULDER SOD SLOPE 1/4" PER FOOT SOD 4" WHITE BORDER j. RAMP DETAIL I: 7 COMPACTED FILL OR AND SYMBOL UNDISTURBED SOIL �� NOTE: WHEN SIDEWALK IS PROVIDE 1/4" TO BE REMOVED & /OR CONTROL JOINTS NEW SIDEWALK IS TO Q 4'0.C., 5' O.C., BE ADDED, IT IS TO 1. 18 "x12" LOGO SIGN BE REMOVED TO THE 8' O.C., OR 12' O.C. NEAREST EXPANSION & 1/2" BITUMINOUS JOINT. EXPANSION JOINTS •616 O 40' O.C. FOR 4' 1 SERIES "C" SIDEWALKS, 50' O.C. BACKGROUND FOR 5' OR GREATER. CONCRETE WALK DETAIL N.T.S. I- E - -i i i 1 I I I- L i i- I Ln Ij I I ' [L_i f I_ -i I I I I I I4 „I SYMBOL SHALL BE 5 FT. HIGH & WHITE PAINT COLOR HANDICAPPED PAVEMENT SYMBOL N.T.S. 3 PLACE CONC. SLAB /WALK 4” BELOW FLOOR ELEV. EXCEPT AT DOORS REMAIN FLUSH. EXPANSION JOINT SLOPE AT 1/4" PER FOOT 10:1 MAX. SLOPE SOD NOTES: 1. PROVIDE 5'x5'x4" THICK CONC, SLAB ® ALL EMERGENCY EXITS. 2. CONFORM TO ABOVE DETAIL FOR PLACING WALKS AT THE BLDGS. PLACEMENT OF CONCRETE SLAB AT ALL BUILDINGS N.T.S. NEW BLDG. FIN. FL. GRADE cD� WATER MAIN OR STORM DRAIN 18" MIN. VERTICAL CLEARANCE — — SAN. SEWER rRAnF ROOF DRAIN I� FIN. GROUND I I I 5' UTILITY (i.e. SANITARY SEWER, WATER SERVICE, _ " "` • • FIRE LINE OR STORM DRAIN) BY SITE CONTRACTOR I I TO 5' FROM BLDG. UTILITY WITHIN 5' OF BLDG. BY PLUMBING CONTRACTOR. FINAL CONNECTION BY PLUMBING CONTRACTOR UNLESS OTHERWISE COORDINATED BY THE G,C, UTILITY CONNECTION AT ALL BUILDINGS N.T.S. - to 10 � z WATER MAIN OR STORM DRAIN D.I.P. IS USED IN PLACE OF P.V.C. FORA USED OF 10' EACH WAY + FROM CE OF WATER MAIN WHEN GRADE THE VERTICAL CLEARANCE BETWEEN�� WATER & SEWER MAINS IS 18' OR LESS. o z 18" OR MORE VERTICAL CL. WATER MIN - - I 10' MIN L . P.V.C. OR V.C.P. HORIZONTAL CLEARANCE A SAN. SEWER GRAVITY MAIN NOTE: CONCRETE ENCASEMENT OF STORM SEWER + SANITARY SEWER GRAVITY OR SAN. SEWER MAIN IS NOT PERMITTED. GRAVITY MAIN VERTICAL CLEARANCE HORIZONTAL CLEARANCE WATER MAIN & SANITARY SEWER CLEARANCES N.T.S. PARFJNG BY DISABLED PEBMff ONLY $255 FINE F.S. 318,18 GALVANIZED METAL SIGN POST WITH 3/8" HOLES DRILLED' ON 1" CENTERS FINISHED o GROUND ° O ° O O O ^T ,, g 1 "DROP 8 ° 3000 PSI CONIC. "4. i; 8 ° N 0 0 12" SIGN POST DETAIL 6" CONC 12" CONC: 6" ELECTRIC BELL--\ WATER FLOW SWITCH - 2" MAIN DRAIN VAr- RETENTION VAULT N.T.S. SITE PLAN --- -� SCALE: SYSTEM SUPPLY t. t — 6" CONC. —SLOT 4.45 ANCE CHECK VALVE ( VA / //J 2FLY VA. MPER SW, UG SUPPLY BLDG. 'RISER DETAIL SCALE: N.T,S. Clearwater Fire & Rescue requires all fire department connections to be located on the private property unless and exception is issued in writing by the authority having jurisdiction (AHJ). Such connection SHALL be a two and one half -inch (2 1/2 ") Siamese connection verified by the AHJ II fire department connections (FDC) shall be yard FDC and shall be a minimum of 15ft. from the protected building. IFreestanding FDC piping shall be capable of supporting and /or resisting the weight and lateral Forces applied by connecting (2) three -inch (3 ") hose lines when subjected to a minimum of 150 psi. New FDC locations shall not be located on any double check valve assembly. The FDC shall be a two and one half inch (2 1/2 ") connection listed for use as a fire) department sprinkler connection. The two and one half inch (2 1/2 ") connection shall be in accordance with design specifications as stated in NFPA 1963, Standard for Fire Hose Connections The FDC shall be arranged so that the connection is between thirty inches (30 ") anti thirty -six inches (36 ") above the finished grade at the location of the connection TRUNCATED DOMES PER FDOT INDEX 304 �'Z J N' • 'dam.. -. u °�" '` ��. FLUSH CURB CURB HANDICAP RAMP DETAIL N.T.S. CURB 1� 1 THIS DRAWING IS ENGINEER, AND S THE CONSENT OF N.T.S. N.T.S. CO'' EIAI 1�1 12" '[ 3 1 t FTP - 25 1 -1 /2 "R BLUE FLUSH CURB 1/2" WIDE BACKGROUND FLUSH CURB WHITE BORDER j. RAMP DETAIL I: 7 AND SYMBOL z �� IPARK SIGN SPECIFICATIONS we ING BY 1. 18 "x12" LOGO SIGN �,. • SABLED 2. 2 SIGN COMBINATION WHITE •616 1 SERIES "C" REFLECTIVE SHEETING BACKGROUND ERMIT LETTERS V M V ONLY 1/2" BLACK 3. LETTERS TO BE "C" A.• GILL F'tLD. PA. • BORDER 1" HIGH SERIES Fr - di 4 -s a •__• �r fi, -'. .*..'p'i . ,fib :,`1 _ 1.5" 4. SIGN TO BE MADE OF $255 FINE 1" ALUMINUM WHITE BACKGROUND L° 1 5. POST TO BE MADE OF F.S. 318.18 1 GALVANIZED STEEL 1.5 (SEE DETAIL) 3" 6" 3" 6. SIGNAGE PER A.D.A. FTP -55 REQUIREMENTS HANDICAP PARKING SIGN DETAIL PARFJNG BY DISABLED PEBMff ONLY $255 FINE F.S. 318,18 GALVANIZED METAL SIGN POST WITH 3/8" HOLES DRILLED' ON 1" CENTERS FINISHED o GROUND ° O ° O O O ^T ,, g 1 "DROP 8 ° 3000 PSI CONIC. "4. i; 8 ° N 0 0 12" SIGN POST DETAIL 6" CONC 12" CONC: 6" ELECTRIC BELL--\ WATER FLOW SWITCH - 2" MAIN DRAIN VAr- RETENTION VAULT N.T.S. SITE PLAN --- -� SCALE: SYSTEM SUPPLY t. t — 6" CONC. —SLOT 4.45 ANCE CHECK VALVE ( VA / //J 2FLY VA. MPER SW, UG SUPPLY BLDG. 'RISER DETAIL SCALE: N.T,S. Clearwater Fire & Rescue requires all fire department connections to be located on the private property unless and exception is issued in writing by the authority having jurisdiction (AHJ). Such connection SHALL be a two and one half -inch (2 1/2 ") Siamese connection verified by the AHJ II fire department connections (FDC) shall be yard FDC and shall be a minimum of 15ft. from the protected building. IFreestanding FDC piping shall be capable of supporting and /or resisting the weight and lateral Forces applied by connecting (2) three -inch (3 ") hose lines when subjected to a minimum of 150 psi. New FDC locations shall not be located on any double check valve assembly. The FDC shall be a two and one half inch (2 1/2 ") connection listed for use as a fire) department sprinkler connection. The two and one half inch (2 1/2 ") connection shall be in accordance with design specifications as stated in NFPA 1963, Standard for Fire Hose Connections The FDC shall be arranged so that the connection is between thirty inches (30 ") anti thirty -six inches (36 ") above the finished grade at the location of the connection TRUNCATED DOMES PER FDOT INDEX 304 �'Z J N' • 'dam.. -. u °�" '` ��. FLUSH CURB CURB HANDICAP RAMP DETAIL N.T.S. CURB 1� 1 THIS DRAWING IS ENGINEER, AND S THE CONSENT OF N.T.S. N.T.S. CO'' EIAI 1�1 �- CURB '[ 3 1 t e� ga FLUSH CURB 0 ph !IN FLUSH CURB j. RAMP DETAIL I: 7 N.T.S. ~ z �� ■ we �,. • o M � •616 E13 #5936 0 $LOMN OF `S R �H�LL ,REMAIN THE PROPERTY OF THE ISHEL�OI�jS USED IN ANY WAY WITHOUT V M V �- CURB '[ 3 1 t e� i FLUSH CURB i FLUSH CURB j. RAMP DETAIL I: 7 N.T.S. ~ f; ■ �,. •616 �$�'�! £1•'v ..; $LOMN OF `S R �H�LL ,REMAIN THE PROPERTY OF THE ISHEL�OI�jS USED IN ANY WAY WITHOUT d RF,RRb0LiCtD,•R pEl?! _7G E N S . •©COiG,HT %' 2009 NOT PUBLISHED A.• GILL F'tLD. PA. • {{1'TH L�j� •NN�F $LID`: UNLESS 0F• SSFp{IIT,T{ SIU� G.(EN`GiM1}ER;Sr SEAL - Fr - di 4 -s a •__• �r fi, -'. .*..'p'i . ,fib :,`1 _ '[ 3 1 t i i( i 4 j. I: 7 f; ■ 6" Res „ .. ium NOTE; I. NO PVC RISERS ALLOWED BLOWOEE DETAIL CITY INDEX N❑. 404j 1 OF 1 N.T.S. �e J�,Iet NOTE: Win s onl If 3' Transition Side Slo es Re ulre. L`Ll ve`'er A A Back of Curb 1 I Non —slip surface require— _0 a) erty / R.O. y Conc, Sidewalk B B PLAN VIEW TYPICAL EIRE HYDRANT SETTING n.t.s. ONLY APPROVED Kennedy Guardian No. K -81A Mutter Centurian No, A -423 Varies U.S. Pipe Metropolitan /—Valve Box c I Valve cu Connecting Piece w /integrally I 'Restraining Joint (Typ,) cast Mech, Joint Gland on one End -D,I, Rotatable Mech, Joint Gland on Other End, NOTES: 1, All Fire Hydrants to have 5 1/4" Valve Seat, 2, See Index # 407 for Jack & Bore Details, Remove Curb if Existing Exist Conc Drive Max Slope 1" 1" 1� Max Slope 14 4„ 1/2" Exp. Joint 1 /2" Exp. Joint 6" TYPICAL DRIVEWAY CROSS SECTION E� O L w v R E o 0 4' Min Residential Street 1' City R/W Remove Back of Curb on State or Vertical Curbs with a vertical Saw cut 0 5' Min Arterial Street 2' County R/W or Remove entire Curb and Replace as Part of Sidewalk Ramp. Modified and Volley Gutter Curbs 1 /4" per Foot join exist back of curb �— o 4 4 1211 Textured Surface 1 "0 Max Slope �� Back of Curb 3000 psi cant 411 thick. Constr. 6" �- o v thick at driveways with 6x6 #10 e Remove to an welded wire mesh, See note 7. �1/2" Expansion Joint even joint or sawcut SECTION A -A SECTION B -B NOTES: 1. Provide tooled joints at distances matching the width. Also place expansion joints at driveways. 2. If some physical obstruction exists which prevents the placing of sidewalks as shown, contact the Engineering Division for alternate location. 3. Wooden and other spacers will not be permitted in sidewalks or driveways. 4. No coatings of any kind will be permitted on concrete sidewalks or driveways without specific approval of the City Engineer. 5. All concrete shall be 3000 psi min. O 28 days, with fiber mesh reinforcing. 6. Concrete surface to be light broom finish. 7. Concrete driveway construction shall be 6" thick w 6x6 /10x10 welded wire mesh reinforcement. 8. Romps shall have a tactile surface, textured to a depth not exceeding 1/811 by use of tamp or roller in conformance with requirements of FDOT Roadway and Traffic Design Standards, Detail 304 or most recent modifications. 3 4/9/02 Rev. Notes R C. 2 1/95 odded note J.C.J. TYPICAL SIDEWALK 1/93 I 11/93 modified curb cut CONSTRUCTION AND JWR T.C.J. RAMP DETAIL 109 C.M.H. 1 OF 3 Lot 2 �, Lot Lot I f 4 wry or /w line I ----------- -- - - - - -- - Water Main -------- 1 ------------------------------------------------------ Curbi I I O I � � n San, O Water Servi M,H, (Typ,) �i —Sanitary Lateral Curd_� I I r/w (inRj Wm 2 I-- ®-10' NOTE: SANITARY LATERALS TO BE I c� WITHIN 10' OF CENTER OF LOT ON DOWNHILL SIDE OF CENTER OF LOT, PLAN VIEW Rim M,H, of Street Sanitary Water Main PR ❑FILE (Typ,) OSidewalk Main 2' joint in pipe entry Side Lot Line Lot (Typ,) CITY ❑F CLEARWATER, FLORIDA ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT REDRAWN BY SANITARY LATERAL DATE B.V.D. 06/30/94 CHECKED BY LOCATIONS INDEX N0 OS REV DATE DESCRIPTION APP. APPROVED BY 3 G.C.H. of 3 NS S: l Win e s onl r if �e�e 4top o` �c � *�5�' 3' Transition o s Re uie. A of A soak of Curb Non —slip surface require- ments, see Note 8. Property / R.O.W. Line 0 U Conc. Sidewalk B 0 B PLAN VIEW 1 Tapping Sleeve & Valve By City, Fee by Owner or Contractor Exist, Water Main I 2 Non - Penetrating Pick Holes • 24" - ---— 25 3/4' �I 29 1/2' RING — SECTI ❑N Weight 85 lbs, ° 0 ° p ° 0 0 0 ° 0 ° 0 ° 0 0 0 ° 0 ° 0 0 ° 0 ° 0 ° 0 ° p ° p ° p ° ° 0 ° 0 ° S ❑LID COVER 25 112" — - I iu S ❑LID COVER �.ECTI ❑N NOTES Weight 120 lbs. 1, U.S. Foundry No, 117 Ring And BL Cover, Or Equal, CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT REDRAWN BY ;ANITARY SEWER DATE Novo 4/95 CHECKED BY MANHOLE COVER INDEX NO. R.C.S. CAST IR ❑N 301 REV. DATE DESCRIPTION APP. DESIGNED BY 2 OF 2 U.S.Foundr Finish grade to R/W allow 0,4' min., 1,0' max. fall from property line to , loack oF cur , Minimum 36" Behind Back Of Curb Or Edge of Paveme 36" v sidewalk Hull I SECTION Remove Curb if Existing Exist Conc Drive Max Slope O1" 1" 10 Max Slope v a e 6 "6 a 4,. , 4., 1/2" Exp. Joint 1/211 Exp. Joint E 1 TYPICAL DRIVEWAY CROSS SECTION R o 0 4' Min Residential Street 1' City R/W o- 5' Min Arterial Street 2' County R/W I)NF0 1/4" per Foot i � • o Back of Curb 3000 psi concrete 4" thick. Constr. 6" thick at driveways with 6 "x 6" /10x10 NOTES: SECTION B —B welded wire fabric. (See note 7.) I. Provide tooled joints of distances matching the width. Also place expansion joints at driveways. 2. If some physical obstruction exists which prevents the placing of sidewalks as shown, contact the Engineering Division for alternate location. Remove entire Curb and Replace as Part of Sidewalk Ramp. 3. Wooden and other spacers will not be permitted in sidewalks or driveways. 4. No coatings of any kind will be permitted on concrete sidewalks or driveways without specific approval of the City Engineer. 12" Textured Surface 5. All concrete shall be 3000 psi min, @ 28 days, with fiber 1 "� Max Slope mesh reinforcing. 6. Concrete surface to be light broom finish. , e 7. Concrete driveway construction shall be 611 thick w 6"x 6" /10x10 Remove to an welded wire fabric reinforcement. 1/211 Expansion Joint even joint or sawcut 8. Ramps shall have a tactile surface, textured to o depth not exceeding 1/8" by use of tamp or roller in conformance with SECTION A -A requirements of FOOT Roadway and Traffic Design Standards, Detail 304 or most recent modifications. TYPICAL SIDEWALK CONSTRUCTION & RAMP DETAIL CITY INDEX NO. 109; 1 OF 3 N.T.S. cleanou 0 Double -Sweep Ted_ L_ CITY OWNED AND MAINTAINED ervice Lateral N 30 " -36" or as Dir�th ed by e C ity HOMEOWNER OWNED _ AND MAINTAINED ANY VARIANCE MUST HAVE WRITTEN APPROVAL OF THE CITY ENGINEER. 3' C.I. FRAME & COVER U,5. FOUNDRY 1195 W OR EQUAL APPROVED BARREL JOINT SEALS CONCENTRIC CONE (FLAT COVER '0' Revisions: No. Date Description z 1 01 126109 ARE -RINGS AND RAM - NECKS' ON SHALLOW MANHOLES 0' TO Q 04106109 Drc Comments TWO CONTINUOUS RINGS AT ALL JOINTS 4' DEPTH) 05/ 1 3/09 Drc Comments 0 ALL JOINTS SHALL BE SEALED, 0 5 ISTEEL REINFORCEMENT . 0 -- 5" MIN. WALL THICKNESS 0 TYPE H ACID RESISTENT 0 4' MIN. I CEMENT 4000 PSI r — GROUT FILL OPENING WITH 12" MIN. f NON- SHRINK MORTAR . . 2 %FT MIN • h g 2' JOINT IN PIPE ENTRY g`, T (TYPICAL) C" 1`� GROUT FLOW CHANNEL NOTES ZI Iii ,� � a �t r,• 04 PVC PIPE REQUIRES MANHOLE 1• MINIMUM CONCRETE COMPRHENSIVE STRENGTH.' 4000 PSI ®28 DAYS ADAPTER COUPLING BY FLO 0 LU �- 2. DESIGN LOADING; H -20 CONTROL, INC., OR APPROVED 7R, BASE SECTION IS MONOLITHIC WATER STOP COUPLING. 0 113;� . 4 MANHOLES SHALL HAVE AN INTERIOR AND EXTERIOR COATING PER SPECIFICATION SECTION GS -10. NOTE. DOG HOUSE MANHOLE SHALL BE INSTALLED ON TOP OF A PRE -CAST OR POURED -IN -PLACE CONCRETE SLAB. Issue Date: 11/13/0�� Revisions: No. Date Description z 1 01 126109 City Comments Q 04106109 Drc Comments ® 05/ 1 3/09 Drc Comments 0 A . 0 5 . 0 0 0 0 r r k,. F r t i I 't F t z m DOGHOUSE MANHOLE DETAIL FE IS DRAWING IS p '�_'TRUNI~NROF•tE(� IEEhINQ NAt�;REMAIN THE PROPERTY OF THE GINEER, AND SH LJr� •NOT ZE ='REI P DNCED, PUBL ED' OR USED IN ANY WAY WITHOUT E CONSENT OF''< b..EN EER.• ,� COBi'131GHT'2009 NOT PUBLISHED N. T. S. ;. ;: �:N:. A 7 A 3� i' i . "' 009 �� • 4F: .. S TE ,MAY 4 R�►il�'+� �AEGe thz� R�� P' "7` ,439` �-- COfrIE$, OF _1WESE tPLANS'RftE• NOT VQiID UNLESS EAIBQS$ED-', ITH- 'THE!SIGNING- ENGINEER'S SEAL . A . 5 r 1` n 1 % w a i ;i D 5 r 0 AIM// IV ST ------ --- - 1 031 00 ELM MM am M MqU I, f mm rw ffm om ong r/ 01719 offl- [Tam N 3 2 W15 3 1 2 If—,i5 WB _Mk W15 L i P W o-� RA] lY F, P o SIR U--UU- RL 30, 1W - 4 �o Vs 4 lr [4 JP �2 P R� V AV 0 'p, kg 1. SO c� I-, 16 91 RA .05 3 z a WILE '1151rdi`� R%1ki4"WjAqW= 3 1 11 - - -, - * I'll -1,/ 11. i r,, 155 110 27 01 AV zz -4 PM1 5V 1 0 IF N DT C 57 2 WR I-WR WPI CB C-15- [ 1 C5__ 1. - - -J ' ' ' 111 A L — ----- ----------- TREE INVENTORY NUMBER -C 1 -5 5,6,7,8 BUILD 7 IS DT_ 3 PROTECTED TREES TO BE REMOVED RATED 3+ 5,6,8 3 j C[31 WA PROPOSED INSTALLED PALMS 3/1 CREDIT WITH A HEIGHT OF I 0`CT (6 Adonidia, 4 fishtail, 2 Areca, 8 Alexander, 21 Sabals, 20 Washingtonia, 11 Foxtail) = 68 trees@ 311 = 22.6 or 22 trees@ 2" ="I. (3 Bizmarkla Barge canopy palm]) @ III or 3 @ 2" ea. = 6" Lj_ I AC.1 _j M Q r) 5 C -) NP_ —LCd2 M 2 KA �H, r. � z TO �txl [ 1 C5__ 1. - - -J ' ' ' 111 A L — ----- ----------- TREE INVENTORY NUMBER 3 L 01 01 If TREE INVENTORY NUMBER 3 5,6,7,8 BUILD 7 IS 08 3 PROTECTED TREES TO BE REMOVED RATED 3+ 5,6,8 3 j tt WA PROPOSED INSTALLED PALMS 3/1 CREDIT WITH A HEIGHT OF I 0`CT (6 Adonidia, 4 fishtail, 2 Areca, 8 Alexander, 21 Sabals, 20 Washingtonia, 11 Foxtail) = 68 trees@ 311 = 22.6 or 22 trees@ 2" ="I. (3 Bizmarkla Barge canopy palm]) @ III or 3 @ 2" ea. = 6" Lj_ I AC.1 M Q r) 5 C -) NP_ —LCd2 M �H, r. TO �txl j Z, slow _-Z L Ellin Mom a 000 inns L 01 01 If TREE INVENTORY NUMBER 3 5,6,7,8 BUILD 7 IS 08 3 PROTECTED TREES TO BE REMOVED RATED 3+ 5,6,8 3 j tt WA PROPOSED INSTALLED PALMS 3/1 CREDIT WITH A HEIGHT OF I 0`CT (6 Adonidia, 4 fishtail, 2 Areca, 8 Alexander, 21 Sabals, 20 Washingtonia, 11 Foxtail) = 68 trees@ 311 = 22.6 or 22 trees@ 2" ="I. (3 Bizmarkla Barge canopy palm]) @ III or 3 @ 2" ea. = 6" Lj_ I AC.1 M Q r) 5 C -) NP_ —LCd2 M r. L 01 01 CM If TREE INVENTORY NUMBER 3 5,6,7,8 BUILD 7 IS 08 3 PROTECTED TREES TO BE REMOVED RATED 3+ 5,6,8 3 j tt WA PROPOSED INSTALLED PALMS 3/1 CREDIT WITH A HEIGHT OF I 0`CT (6 Adonidia, 4 fishtail, 2 Areca, 8 Alexander, 21 Sabals, 20 Washingtonia, 11 Foxtail) = 68 trees@ 311 = 22.6 or 22 trees@ 2" ="I. (3 Bizmarkla Barge canopy palm]) @ III or 3 @ 2" ea. = 6" Lj_ I AC.1 M CM Ul 5V_1 2G_ lwrrrlA ■■I i. II 5 F 2(_� b_ __ �CB2 _- _1 I If TREE INVENTORY NUMBER 3 5,6,7,8 BUILD 7 T 3 PROTECTED TREES TO BE REMOVED RATED 3+ 5,6,8 3 j _j;= WA PROPOSED INSTALLED PALMS 3/1 CREDIT WITH A HEIGHT OF I 0`CT (6 Adonidia, 4 fishtail, 2 Areca, 8 Alexander, 21 Sabals, 20 Washingtonia, 11 Foxtail) = 68 trees@ 311 = 22.6 or 22 trees@ 2" ="I. (3 Bizmarkla Barge canopy palm]) @ III or 3 @ 2" ea. = 6" Lj_ I AC.1 Q r) 5 C -) NP_ —LCd2 r. TO �txl j Z, slow _-Z L Ellin Mom a 000 inns Ul 5V_1 2G_ lwrrrlA ■■I i. II 5 F 2(_� b_ __ �CB2 _- _1 I now NONE loura 0 /00.01 ;i 3 PE 8.3C) If TREE INVENTORY NUMBER 3 5,6,7,8 BUILD 7 T 3 PROTECTED TREES TO BE REMOVED RATED 3+ 5,6,8 3 j _j;= WA PROPOSED INSTALLED PALMS 3/1 CREDIT WITH A HEIGHT OF I 0`CT (6 Adonidia, 4 fishtail, 2 Areca, 8 Alexander, 21 Sabals, 20 Washingtonia, 11 Foxtail) = 68 trees@ 311 = 22.6 or 22 trees@ 2" ="I. (3 Bizmarkla Barge canopy palm]) @ III or 3 @ 2" ea. = 6" Lj_ I AC.1 Q r) 5 C -) NP_ —LCd2 r. _-Z L Q) [7 now NONE loura 0 /00.01 ;i 3 PE 8.3C) R E 2 WR MMM –am .4 0 0 J. ii (J 3 C_[3 01", TH 22 L j W_P_ DL o rog r 1- l (� 1 l - - -- i �- -t'1- �r} �; __ -.'� Iii __1_1- �-_f. � i ?';x`�� ,,r �� , ' ,4 o 4 h1 (A 0 U Q IE 1i N.W 711�./ RETENTIOPi 1 WR V0 N 1.1 7" 3 0 � 7111ul -CB2 3'- NP, F 17 L4, NP �7 NP j Mr. I IM, I IMAM LAUT j 7 AV � 1 ?� inig" 'P, 7 J. _\Aj "'q 10 a t . � _ . - f 'j, I , - 1,V V Vj C\ A. AV -A. C 21 112 KA " z RA --- --- ---- - --- ------ - ----- --- 3V X. - ------ -- - ----- -------- ------ -- ---- ----- _q 0. 0 0 '(/v / ) I ___ 135 A/ 8,9 05 39 W G r, 345 KA-1 1� 5A M ME rN no M Mal mm L., M mm M W, M MM ME Em M, om Mm M an mm 0M UM EM 11M EM EM m g" z, mm, M M M M MRA W""M M M LK-ILKLA glim, in" KENDALL ST PLANT SCHEDULE TREES CODE QTY BOTANICAL COMMON CONT CAL 512E AC G Adondia merrillu Christmas Palm B * b 5in,31c trunk I O'oa 155 3 Bj5marckia nobilis'51ver' Silver Bh5mark Palm 13*13 Robust 10' ct+ CM 4 Caryota mites fishtail Palm 15*13 Multi-trunk 14'-1 G' CB II Conocarpus crectus seri(CCU5 Silver Buttonwood 45 jai 3"Cal 10,0a DL G Dyp5is lute5cens Areca Palm B * 13 Multi-trunk 12-15' H W 2 Lt-justrum japonicum Japanese Privet 100 jai 4"Cal I O'oa PE 8 Ptychosperms elegans Alexander Palm 1545 Robust I O'ct+ 55 21 5abal palmetto Cabbage Palmetto B * B Robust I O'ct+ WR 20 Washmgtonta robusta Mexican Fan Palm B*13 Robust I O'ct+ W5 I I Wodyetia bifurcata Foxtall Palm 5 * 13 Robust 18, SHRUBS CODE QTY BOTANICAL COMMON CONT HT AV 29 Alpinia zenumbet 'Varieaata' Variegated Shell Ginger 7 gal 30 C152 39 Can553 macrocarpa 'Boxwood Beauty' Dwarf Carissa 3 gal 12" DT 110 Dianclia tasmanica Flax bly 3 gal 18.. DE 31 Duranta erects 'Gold Mound' Gold Mound Duranta 3 gal 16, NP 55 Nerium oleander 'Petite Pink' Petite Pink Oleander 3 jai 24"oa 0. PM 95 Podocarpus macrophyllus Yew Pine 7 gal 48" RA IG7 Rhapholepi5 indica 'Alba' White Indian Hawthorn 3 gal 24" 5pr 5V 89 5chefflera arboncola 'Trinettd' Variegated Arboricola 3 gal 24'oa Vs 9 Viburnum su5pen5um 5andankwa Viburnum 3 gal 24"oa GROUND COVER5 CODE QTY BOTANICAL COMMON CONT F177 ir IOG Jumpen.15 chinerl Tar5omi' Parsons Juniper 3 -jai@ 24'oc LLI 5A 130 5f 5tenotaphrum secundatum 'Floritam' flontam 5t. Augustine Sad sod TREE TABULATION TABLE 8 TREES INVENTORIED If TREE INVENTORY NUMBER 3 5,6,7,8 BUILD 7 T 3 PROTECTED TREES TO BE REMOVED RATED 3+ 5,6,8 _j;= 7-112 TOTAL INCHES REMOVED (DEFICIT INCHES) 41 TOTAL INCHES PROPOSED TREES INSTALLED (not including any palms) PROPOSED INSTALLED PALMS 3/1 CREDIT WITH A HEIGHT OF I 0`CT (6 Adonidia, 4 fishtail, 2 Areca, 8 Alexander, 21 Sabals, 20 Washingtonia, 11 Foxtail) = 68 trees@ 311 = 22.6 or 22 trees@ 2" ="I. (3 Bizmarkla Barge canopy palm]) @ III or 3 @ 2" ea. = 6" Lj_ R E 2 WR MMM –am .4 0 0 J. ii (J 3 C_[3 01", TH 22 L j W_P_ DL o rog r 1- l (� 1 l - - -- i �- -t'1- �r} �; __ -.'� Iii __1_1- �-_f. � i ?';x`�� ,,r �� , ' ,4 o 4 h1 (A 0 U Q IE 1i N.W 711�./ RETENTIOPi 1 WR V0 N 1.1 7" 3 0 � 7111ul -CB2 3'- NP, F 17 L4, NP �7 NP j Mr. I IM, I IMAM LAUT j 7 AV � 1 ?� inig" 'P, 7 J. _\Aj "'q 10 a t . � _ . - f 'j, I , - 1,V V Vj C\ A. AV -A. C 21 112 KA " z RA --- --- ---- - --- ------ - ----- --- 3V X. - ------ -- - ----- -------- ------ -- ---- ----- _q 0. 0 0 '(/v / ) I ___ 135 A/ 8,9 05 39 W G r, 345 KA-1 1� 5A M ME rN no M Mal mm L., M mm M W, M MM ME Em M, om Mm M an mm 0M UM EM 11M EM EM m g" z, mm, M M M M MRA W""M M M LK-ILKLA glim, in" KENDALL ST PLANT SCHEDULE TREES CODE QTY BOTANICAL COMMON CONT CAL 512E AC G Adondia merrillu Christmas Palm B * b 5in,31c trunk I O'oa 155 3 Bj5marckia nobilis'51ver' Silver Bh5mark Palm 13*13 Robust 10' ct+ CM 4 Caryota mites fishtail Palm 15*13 Multi-trunk 14'-1 G' CB II Conocarpus crectus seri(CCU5 Silver Buttonwood 45 jai 3"Cal 10,0a DL G Dyp5is lute5cens Areca Palm B * 13 Multi-trunk 12-15' H W 2 Lt-justrum japonicum Japanese Privet 100 jai 4"Cal I O'oa PE 8 Ptychosperms elegans Alexander Palm 1545 Robust I O'ct+ 55 21 5abal palmetto Cabbage Palmetto B * B Robust I O'ct+ WR 20 Washmgtonta robusta Mexican Fan Palm B*13 Robust I O'ct+ W5 I I Wodyetia bifurcata Foxtall Palm 5 * 13 Robust 18, SHRUBS CODE QTY BOTANICAL COMMON CONT HT AV 29 Alpinia zenumbet 'Varieaata' Variegated Shell Ginger 7 gal 30 C152 39 Can553 macrocarpa 'Boxwood Beauty' Dwarf Carissa 3 gal 12" DT 110 Dianclia tasmanica Flax bly 3 gal 18.. DE 31 Duranta erects 'Gold Mound' Gold Mound Duranta 3 gal 16, NP 55 Nerium oleander 'Petite Pink' Petite Pink Oleander 3 jai 24"oa 0. PM 95 Podocarpus macrophyllus Yew Pine 7 gal 48" RA IG7 Rhapholepi5 indica 'Alba' White Indian Hawthorn 3 gal 24" 5pr 5V 89 5chefflera arboncola 'Trinettd' Variegated Arboricola 3 gal 24'oa Vs 9 Viburnum su5pen5um 5andankwa Viburnum 3 gal 24"oa GROUND COVER5 CODE QTY BOTANICAL COMMON CONT F177 ir IOG Jumpen.15 chinerl Tar5omi' Parsons Juniper 3 -jai@ 24'oc LLI 5A 130 5f 5tenotaphrum secundatum 'Floritam' flontam 5t. Augustine Sad sod TREE TABULATION TABLE 8 TREES INVENTORIED TREE INVENTORY NUMBER 4 TREES INSIDE PROPERTY BOUNDARIES 5,6,7,8 I TREES RATED 2 OR LESS ON INVENTORY 7 3 PROTECTED TREES TO BE REMOVED RATED 3+ 5,6,8 PALMS REMOVED DEFICIT 2-112- CAL EA. 7-112 TOTAL INCHES REMOVED (DEFICIT INCHES) 41 TOTAL INCHES PROPOSED TREES INSTALLED (not including any palms) PROPOSED INSTALLED PALMS 3/1 CREDIT WITH A HEIGHT OF I 0`CT (6 Adonidia, 4 fishtail, 2 Areca, 8 Alexander, 21 Sabals, 20 Washingtonia, 11 Foxtail) = 68 trees@ 311 = 22.6 or 22 trees@ 2" ="I. (3 Bizmarkla Barge canopy palm]) @ III or 3 @ 2" ea. = 6" (Credit inches = 41 "+44"+6' = 91 "total) - (Deficit inches 75') = 83.5" credit BUTLER DESIGN GROUP, INC 4203 46TH AVE. N. ST. PETERSBURG, FL. 33714 PH 727-521-1684, FAX: 727-527-7422, E-MAIL:RONSPLANS@TAMPABAY.RR.COM DRAWN BY: RON BELKO ISA Certified Arborist: FL-5802A ISA Certified Municipal Specialist: FL-5802M FNGLA Certified Landscape Designer: D31-66 FNGLA Certified Horticulture Professional: H31-6445 R Iltll r. R Iltll STAKING DETAIL =1 1-1 III Q a "CINCH -TIE ", "GRO- STRAIT ", 8 THAN THE OR EQUAL FLEXIBLE RUBBER w o AERIAL GUY TREE TIES IN FIGURE EIGHT w I -I CABLES TO FASHION. ATTACH TO STAKE F- CONNECT W/ TWO GALV. ROOFING NAILS. x TRUNKS; KEEP TURF CLEAR F OR 18 O 0 m W G CABLE 2" LODGEPOLE PINE TREATED a s PLASTIC TREE STAKES. SET STAKES COATING THRU APPROXIMATELY 120 DEGREES -1 5/8" DIA. APART. 00 r- RUBBER HOSE 00 TIE. ry . ° o - cN I-- I- WATER RING (6' WIDTH B, HEIGHT) , i AREAS. FINISHED GRADE ' FINISHED GRADE, I AT LAWN. X ROOTBALL co Ln a 12" 1 K=M II IT SHR UBS. %L� I - -- - - - -- - - -- =I I ROOTBALL I I I I I I I -I I; I w 0 -' Ln t 0 (o ; III�IIII�IIII- II :IIII��II a� / ¢¢¢ ¢ x0 0 Lo A m O - - . - - AVOID PLACING STAKES -- PLANT TABLETS AS - SEE PLANT PIT - -- THRU ROOTBALL. NOTED OR SPEICIFIED. DETAIL. \ 00 CO i STAKING DETAIL =1 1-1 III Q 5 LAYERS OF BURLAP, - - -- SET ROOTBALL CROWN 1 1/2" HIGHER 8 THAN THE SURROUNDING FINISHED © GRADE. SLOPE BACKFILL AWAY FROM Drc Comments ROOTBALL FOR POSITIVE DRAINAGE. PLANTING AT PLANTING AT TURF AREAS. 0 SHRUB AREAS. KEEP TURF CLEAR F OR 18 KEEP MULCH 6" - 8" RADIUS CIRCLE AROUND THE FROM BASE OF TREE. TREE. MULCH WITH A 3" THICK LAYER OF SHREDDED BARK. 0 < MULCH WATER WELL 1 AREA TO 3" DEPTH. RECESS TURF AREA - -- - -- 6" HIGH WATER = 1" TO ALLOW FOR MULCH. ry . ° o - cN WELL AT SHRUB WATER RING (6' WIDTH B, HEIGHT) , i AREAS. FINISHED GRADE ' PROVIDING A WATER COLLECTION co AT LAWN. X ROOTBALL INISHED GRADE 12" 1 K=M II IT SHR UBS. %L� J 0 0 0l AT 5 GALLON Ir =1 =1 ¢ m m m - III -I I I I I I I I -I 11- I- -' Ln t 0 (o ; ROOTBALL --I a� / ¢¢¢ ¢ O \, Y \ O - - . - / -- PLANT TABLETS AS - C 04 'D NNN UNIFORMLY AROUND NOTED OR SPEICIFIED. \ ROOT MASS BETWEEN BACKFILL MIX, SEE -- 2X ROOTBALL NOTES AND SPECIFICATIONS. 32" AT 15 GALLON - NATIVE SOIL MIX 48" AT 24-" BOX FIRMLY COMPACTED. OF THE ROOTBALL 60" AT 30" BOX 72" AT 36" BOX PLANT PIT DETAIL DETAIL TREE PLANTING MULTI -STAKE WATER WELL: 4" HIGH AT SHRUB, NO WATER WELL AT LAWN AREA, - zo N : z 0 J =1 1-1 III Q 5 LAYERS OF BURLAP, City Comments 8 0410G109 _ - III -I © 05/13/09 Drc Comments J I _jJ < 0 1 I=L IF OR APPROVED ALTERNATE ROOTBALL 0 JI (D LO REMOVE BURLAP AND ALL TIE 0 ¢I �0r- ROOTBALL 0 < z 1 0 Oi ¢ NAIL TO BATTENS & STAKES ry . ° o - cN Z� WATER RING (6' WIDTH B, HEIGHT) , V V ;�D' PROVIDING A WATER COLLECTION co 2 X ROOTBALL BASIN 12" AT 1 GALLON - - 22" AT 5 GALLON 32" AT 15 GALLON 6*,Tmmlwmtljam�� 32 9343.23 -03 SET ROOTBALL CROWN 1 " HIGHER THAN SURROUNDING FINISHED GRADE. SLOPE FINISHED GRADE AT BACKFILL AWAY FROM ROOTBALL. MULCH TO 2" DEPTH AT WATER WELL. IF FINISHED GRADE. III PLANT TABLETS AS NOTED OR SPEICIFIED. BACKFILL MIX, SEE NOTES AND SPECIFICATIONS. NATIVE SOIL MIX FIRMLY COMPACTED. 1" = 1' -0" 32 9333.13 -01 BASE OF HEART /NUT OF PALM CABBAGE PALMS MAY BE HURRICANE CUT ALL OTHERS MUST HAVE FRONDS TIED W /BIODEGRADABLE STRAP OR TWINE TRUNK SHALL BE STRAIGHT AND WITHOUT CURVES, FREE OF SCARS, BURNMARKS AND BOOTS NOTE, STAKING & GUYING REQUIRED FOR PALM, IF NECESSARY, OR AS DIRECTED BY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. HABI TAT MANAGEMENT AND LANDSCAPING PERMITS: HARDWOODS DRIP LINE t✓ a, 0� CIO CC j �T 1. A HABITAT MANAGEMENT AND LANDSCAPING PERMIT IS REQUIRED FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF THIS PROJECT. APPLICATION SHOULD NOT BE MADE UNTIL FINAL ADMINISTRATIVE APPROVAL HAS BEEN GRANTED. o. AN APPLICATION AND AN EXTRA COPY OF THE APPROVED FINAL APPLICATION PLAN MUST BE SUBMITTED TO THIS DEPARTMENT IN ORDER TO PROCESS THE PERMIT. b. ALL EXOTIC SPECIES, I.E., BRAZILIAN PEPPER (SCHINUS TEREBIN- THIFOLIUS), PUNK TREES (MELALEUCA QUINQUENERVIA), AND CHINESE TALLOW (SAPIUM SEBIFERUM) MUST BE REMOVED AS A CONDITION OF SITE DEVELOPMENT. WHERE NECESSARY DUE TO THEIR PROXIMITY TO PROTECTED PLANT MATERIAL, HAND REMOVAL WILL BE REQUIRED. SHOULD THIS REMOVAL BE TO A DEGREE THAT A POTENTIAL FOR EROSION IS CREATED, THE ARE4 MUST BE RESTABILIZED WITH SUITABLE MATERIAL. c. ONCE FINAL ADMINISTRATIVE APPROVAL (FAA) HAS BEEN GRANTED, A BARRICADE INSPECTION CAN BE SCHEDULED, WHEN THE BARRICADES HAVE BEEN APPROVED THE PERMIT CAN BE TYPED AND RELEASED. TREE PROTECTION AND PRESERVATION.- TREE BARRICADES AND EROSION CONTROL MEASURE REQUIREMENTS 1. TREE BARRICADES AND /OR SILT SCREENS OR HAYBALES SHALL BE REQUIRED ALONG THE EDGES OF VEGETATED AREAS TO BE PROTECTED PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF HABITAT MANAGEMENT AND LANDSCAPE PERMITS. THE LOCATION FOR EROSION CONTROL MEASURES ARE SHOWN ON THE CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS. 2. ALL DESIRABLE TREES MUST BE RETAINED WHEREVER POSSIBLE. IT WILL BE REQUIRED THAT PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS (i.e. BUILDINGS, WALKWAYS, DRIVEWAYS, POND BANKS, DRAINAGE SYSTEMS, ETC.) BE ADJUSTED TO RETAIN DESIRABLE TREES. GRADE CHANGES MUST BE SENSITIVE TO TREES REMAINING. IN GENERAL, NO GRADE CHANGES SHOULD OCCUR WITHIN THE CANOPY DRIP LINE OF PINE TREES AND 213 THE CANOPY DRIP LINE OF HARDWOOD TREES TO BE SAVED. LANDSCAPING 1. EACH LANDSCAPING AND REPLANT TREE MUST BE PLANTED WITHIN A MINIMUM FIVE (5) FOOT BY TEN (10) FOOT OPEN SPACE PLANTER WITH SUITABLE GROUND COVER. LANDSCAPE TREES MUST BE PLANTED IN SAME VICINITY AS VEHICULAR USE AREAS IN ORDER TO BREAK THE MONOTONY OF UNBROKEN EXPANSES OF PAVING. TREES MUST NOT BE PLANTED WITHIN MAINTENANCE EASEMENTS. 2. THE USE OF XERISCAPE DESIGN MUST BE UTILIZED FOR THE REQUIRED LANDSCAPE DESIGN. THE DESIGN DEMONSTRATES THE USE OF A LOW VOLUME IRRIGATION SYSTEM, ORGANIC MULCHES, DROUGHT AND COLD TOLERANT PLANT MATERIAL, ZONING OF PLANT MATERIAL BY WATER REQUIREMENTS, SOIL AMENDMENTS (IF NECESSARY) AND THE PRACTICAL USE OF TURF. 3. NEW LANDSCAPING MUST BE PROTECTED FROM VEHICULAR MOVE- MENT BY WHEEL STOPS OR CURBING WHERE POSSIBLE, THE AREA BETWEEN THE BARRIER AND LANDSCAPE MATERIAL SHOULD REMAIN AS GREENSPACE. 4. LARGE TREE SPECIES PROPOSED FOR INSTALLATION MUST BE A MINIMUM OF 20 FEET AWAY FROM BUILDINGS, SIGNS, FENCES, LIGHT POLES, UTILITY LINES AND ANY OTHER OBSTRUCTIONS THAT MAY IMPAIR NATURAL GROWTH. 5. TREES PROPOSED FOR INSTALLATION MUST NOT BE IN CONFLICT WITH PROPOSED OR EXISTING UTILITY LINES OR STRUCTURES, EASE- MENTS OR OTHER AREAS WHICH MAY REQUIRE EXCAVATION IN THE EVENT OF SYSTEM FAILURE. THESE FEATURES SUCH AS THE WATER LINES MUST REMAIN OUTSIDE THE 5' X 10' PLANTER AREA. 6. SOILS WITHIN PLANTER BEDS MUST BE SUITABLE FOR PROPOSED PLANTED MATERIAL WITH REGARDS TO pH, SOIL TEXTURE, SOIL STRUCTURE, AND SEASONAL HIGH WATER TABLE. 7 ALL LANDSCAPE MATERIAL MUST BE FLORIDA GRADE /1 OR BETTER. 8. ALL REQUIRED TREES MUST BE A MINIMUM OF 10' HIGH, 2 -112" CALIPER AT TIME OF PLANTING. 9. ALL HEDGES MUST BE 24" HIGH AT THE TIME OF PLANTING, PLANTED AT 30" ON CENTER, AND BE MAINTAINED AT A MINIMUM OF 3' IN HEIGHT. 10. WHERE LANDSCAPE OR REPLANT TREES ARE PROPOSED TO BE PLANTED IN THE PERIMETER BUFFER, THE BUFFER MUST BE A MINIMUM OF 5' WIDE. IRRIGATION NOTES SPECIFICATIONS - WOOD BARRIER 1, MINIMUM RADIUS TO BE PROTECTED1 A. HARDWOODS - 2/3 DRIPLINE B, CONIFERS & SABAL PALMS - ENTIRE DRIPLINE, 2. UPRIGHTS - NO LESS THAN 2" X 2' LUMBER. 3. HORIZONTALS - NO LESS THAN 1' X 4' LUMBER, 4. BARRIERS SHALL BE ERECTED AROUND ALL PROTECTED TREES AND PALMS, AND INSPECTED BY CITY REPRESENTATIVE BEFORE CONSTRUCTION BEGINS. 5. UPRIGHT POSTS ARE TO BE AT LEAST 4 FEET IN LENGTH WITH A MINIMUM OF 1 FOOT ANCHORED IN GROUND AND 3 FEET ABOVE GROUND, 6. BARRIERS TO REMAIN IN PLACE UNTIL ALL PAVING, CONSTRUCTION AND HEAVY EQUIPMENT IS OUT OF AREA. FURTHER INFORMATION MAY BE OBTAINED FROM THE LAND RESOURCE SPECIALIST AT 562 -4741, 'RIGHT - . I,--, - TREE BARRICADES CLEARWATER INDEX No. 909, SH. 1 of 1 Rev. 4/09/03 N.T.S. 1. RECLAIMED WATER MUST BE USED AS A SOURCE OF IRRIGATION WATER. THE DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM FOR IRRIGATION MUST NOT BE CONNECTED TO COUNTY OR MUNICIPAL WATER SOURCES. 2. IRRIGATION SYSTEMS MUST UTILIZE LOW VOLUME DESIGNS SUCH AS LOW 1 RAJECTORY HEADS OR SOAKER HOSES TO PROVIDE DIRECT AP- PLICAT.I!1A1 AND LOW EVAPORATION. SYSTEMS THAT OVERSPRAY AREAS THAT DO NOT REQUIRE IRRIGATION, SUCH AS PAVED AREAS WILL NOT BE AL'CEPTABLE. HIGH IRRIGATION NEED AREAS MUST NOT OVERSPRAY LOW NEED AREAS. J. HIGH WATER DEMAND LANDSCAPE AREAS SUCH AS TURF MUST BE SERVED BY A SEPARATE IRRIGATION ZONE THAN LOW WATER NEED PLANTER BEDS, OR MULCHED AREAS WITH TREES. IN NO CASE, SHALL ANY f %.ANTED VEGETATION AREA BE MORE THAN 50' FROM A WATER SUPPLY HOSE BIBB. 4. AUTOMATIC IRRIGATION SYSTEMS MUST BE OPERATED BY AN IRRI- GATION SYSTEMS OPERATED BY AN IRRIGATION CONTROLLER CAPABLE OF DIFFERENTIATING BETWEEN THE SCHEDULES OF HIGH AND LOW WATER DEMAND AREAS CONTROLLERS MUST HAVE MULTIPLE CYCLE START CAPACITY AND A FLEXIBLE CALENDAR PROGRAM ABLE TO BE SET TO COMPLY WITH LOCAL OR WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT IMPOSED RESTRICTIONS. 5. AUTOMATIC IRRIGATION SYSTEMS MUST BE EQUIPPED WITH RAIN SENSOR DEVICE OR SWITCH WHICH WILL OVERRIDE THE IRRIGATION CYCLE OF THE SPRINKLER SYSTEM WHEN ADEQUATE RAINFALL HAS THE IRRIGATION CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE AN UNDERGROUND IRRI- GATION SYSTEM TO COVER 1007 OF ALL ON SITE PLANTING AREA. THIS SYSTEM SHALL CONTAIN BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE FOLLOWING: 1. UNDERGROUND PIPING, SHALL BE PVC SCHEDULE 40 OR BETTER. 2. SEVEN (7) DAY PROGRAMMABLE TIME CLOCK TO ACTIVATE ZONES. J. SPRINKLER HEADS COMPATIBLE WITH THE TYPE OF PLANTING. 4. ELECTRIC VALVES. 5. GAUGE 14 OF COPPER WIRE. 6. FIBERGLASS OR PLASTIC ZONE VALVE BOXES. i WHERE PIPING IS UNDER DRIVEWAY AND CONCRETE WALKS, THE PIPES SHALL BE INSTALLED IN SCHEDULE 40 SLEEVES 18" BELOW GRADE. MATERIALS SUPPLIED SHALL BE EQUAL TO THOSE MANUFACTURED BY RAIN BIRD CO. OR APPROVED EQUAL. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT A SYSTEM LAY -OUT ALONG WITH CATALOG SHEETS OF ALL COMPONENTS IN THE SYSTEM TO THE OWNER FOR APPROVAL PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. THE ENTIRE SYSTEM SHALL BE GUARANTEED BY THE CONTRACTOR FOR ONE YEAR FROM THE DATE OF ACCEPTANCE BY THE ARCHITECT/ ENGINEER. ANY AND ALL USE OF HOSE BIBBS IN ASSOCIATION WITH NON - POTABLE WATER SUPPLIES SHALL BE IN FULL COMPLIANCE WITH SBCCI STANDARD PLUMBING CODE, CHAPTER VI CRITERIA REFERENCE COLOR CODING OF ABOVE GRADE RISER PIPING AND LABEL /TAGGING OF OUTLETS AS NON- POTABLE WATER SUPPLY. ANY BUILDING TO BE DEMOLISHED IS SUBJECT TO NOTIFICATION TO THE AIR TOXICS SECTION OF THE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PRIOR TO ANY DEMOLITION OF BUILDINGS. PINES DRIP LINE FNITTRF TIRTP I TNIF XERISCAPING 1. ORGANIC MULCHES AND /OR DROUGHT TOLERANT GROUNDCOVERS WITHIN PROPOSED LANDSCAPE PLANTER BEDS. 2, DROUGHT AND COLD TOLERANT PLANT MATERIAL. 3. GROUPING OR ZONING PLANT MATERIAL BASE ON SIMILAR WATER REQUIREMENTS AND THE LOCATION OF PROPOSED IRRIGATION WATERING SYSTEMS. 4. THE USE OF SOIL TESTING TO IDENTIFY SOIL CONDITIONS NECES- SARY FOR THE CONTINUED SURVIVAL OF PROPOSED LANDSCAPING. 5. ORGANIC SOIL AMENDMENTS (SUCH AS TOP SOILS, MANURES, PEAT AND COMPOSTED MATERIALS) MIXED EXISTING SOILS WITHIN LANDS- CAPING PLANTER BEDS TO DEPTHS CONSISTENT WITH THE ROOT DEPTH OF PROPOSED PLANTED MATERIAL (USE ONLY IF EXISTING SOIL CONDITIONS WARRANT THESE AMENDMENTS). 6. THE PRESERVATION AND INCORPORATION OF EXISTING PLANT COMMUNITIES ON SITE INTO THE LANDSCAPE PLAN. 7 THE MINIMAL USE OF TURF GRASSES WHICH REQUIRE FREQUENT IRRIGATION. 8. LOW- MAINTENANCE DESIGN. TREE & SHRUB PLANTING DETAILS 1. THE ROOT MASS FORM OF EACH TREE PROPOSED FOR INSTALLATION SHALL BE BALLED OR BURLAPPED, BARE ROOT TREES ARE NOT AC- CEPTABLE. ALL NONBIODEGRADABLE WRAPPINGS WILL BE REMOVED AND BURLAP WILL BE FOLDED DOWN TO ENHANCE WATER ABSORPTION. IF WIRE BASKETS ARE USED IN CONJUNCTION WITH BALLED AND BURLAPPED TREES. THE FIRST FEW ROWS OF EACH BASKET WILL BE REMOVED AT THE TIME OF INSTALLATION. 2. SUPPORTING APPARATUS SHALL BE REMOVED AFTER 1 COMPLETE GROWING SEASON, ALSO THE FLEXIBLE ATTACHMENTS SHALL BE USED WHERE SUPPORT WIRES ARE WRAPPED AROUND TREE TRUNKS /STEMS TO PREVENT CAMBIAL DAMAGE, J. PLANTING HOLES ASSOCIATED WITH PROPOSED TREES MUST SLOPE (NOT COMPACTED) AND A MINIMUM OF 18 -24 INCHES WIDER THAN THE DIAMETER OF THE ROOT BALL. TREES SHALL BE INSTALLED SUCH THAT THE TOP OF THE ROOT MASS IS LEVEL WITH THE SURFACE OF THE PLANTING HOLE TREES SHOULD BE INSTALLED 3 - 5 INCHES ABOVE GRADE ON SITES CONTAINING CLAY. A 2 - 3 INCH LAYER OF ORGANIC MULCH MUST ALSO BE PLACED OVER THE ENTIRE SURFACE OF EACH PLANTING HOLE. TO PREVENT FUNGAL INFECTION MULCH SHOULD BE PULLED BACK A FEW INCHES FROM THE BASE OF EACH TREE. 4. IF ON SITE SOIL CONDITIONS ARE SUCH THAT SOIL AMENDMENTS WILL BE NECESSARY, THE PLANTING MUST INCLUDE SOIL MIXTURE THROUGHOUT THE ENTIRE SECTION OF EACH PLANTER AREA TO A DEPTH CONSISTENT WITH THE ROOT DEVELOPMENT OF PROPOSED PLANT MATERIAL. 5. PLANTERS ADJACENT TO OR WITHIN VEHICULAR USE AREAS MUST BE CONSTRUCTED SUCH THAT LIMEROCK, ASPHALT, CONCRETE OR ANY OTHER OBSTRUCTIONS DO NOT EXTEND UNDER THE SURFACE INTO THE PLANTING AREAS. 6. THE PRACTICE OF TREE TRUNK WRAPPING AND THE APPLICATION OF PAINTS /TAR ONTO PRUNED TREE BRANCHES IS NOT RECOMMENDED BY THE INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY OF ARBORICULTURAL. T Issue Date: 09/16/06 Revisions. No. Date Description Q 5 LAYERS OF BURLAP, City Comments 8 0410G109 5 - 2'x4'x16' WOODEN BATTENS, © 05/13/09 Drc Comments CONNECTED WITH 2 -3/4' STEEL BANDS. OR APPROVED ALTERNATE 0 REMOVE BURLAP AND ALL TIE 0 MATERIAL FROM TYNE TOP 1/3 OF ROOTBALL z 2'X4' WOOD BRACE (3 EA, MIN.) 0 i NAIL TO BATTENS & STAKES e Z� WATER RING (6' WIDTH B, HEIGHT) V V ;�D' PROVIDING A WATER COLLECTION co aF BASIN TILLED AND LOOSENED v - - (3) 2'x4'x36' WOODEN STAKES NATIVE SOIL BACKFILL l w o ROOTBALL 3' MULCH LAYER a� / \, Y \ FERTILIZER TABLETS AS SPECIFIED. PLACE / / / / EXISTING UNDISTURBED SOIL UNIFORMLY AROUND ROOT MASS BETWEEN MIDDLE AND BOTTOM MIN. 3 TIMES THE WIDTH OF ROOT MASS. OF THE ROOTBALL PALM PLANTING DETAIL CLEARWATER INDEX No. 904, SH. lof 1 Rev, 8/21/06 N.T.S. HABI TAT MANAGEMENT AND LANDSCAPING PERMITS: HARDWOODS DRIP LINE t✓ a, 0� CIO CC j �T 1. A HABITAT MANAGEMENT AND LANDSCAPING PERMIT IS REQUIRED FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF THIS PROJECT. APPLICATION SHOULD NOT BE MADE UNTIL FINAL ADMINISTRATIVE APPROVAL HAS BEEN GRANTED. o. AN APPLICATION AND AN EXTRA COPY OF THE APPROVED FINAL APPLICATION PLAN MUST BE SUBMITTED TO THIS DEPARTMENT IN ORDER TO PROCESS THE PERMIT. b. ALL EXOTIC SPECIES, I.E., BRAZILIAN PEPPER (SCHINUS TEREBIN- THIFOLIUS), PUNK TREES (MELALEUCA QUINQUENERVIA), AND CHINESE TALLOW (SAPIUM SEBIFERUM) MUST BE REMOVED AS A CONDITION OF SITE DEVELOPMENT. WHERE NECESSARY DUE TO THEIR PROXIMITY TO PROTECTED PLANT MATERIAL, HAND REMOVAL WILL BE REQUIRED. SHOULD THIS REMOVAL BE TO A DEGREE THAT A POTENTIAL FOR EROSION IS CREATED, THE ARE4 MUST BE RESTABILIZED WITH SUITABLE MATERIAL. c. ONCE FINAL ADMINISTRATIVE APPROVAL (FAA) HAS BEEN GRANTED, A BARRICADE INSPECTION CAN BE SCHEDULED, WHEN THE BARRICADES HAVE BEEN APPROVED THE PERMIT CAN BE TYPED AND RELEASED. TREE PROTECTION AND PRESERVATION.- TREE BARRICADES AND EROSION CONTROL MEASURE REQUIREMENTS 1. TREE BARRICADES AND /OR SILT SCREENS OR HAYBALES SHALL BE REQUIRED ALONG THE EDGES OF VEGETATED AREAS TO BE PROTECTED PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF HABITAT MANAGEMENT AND LANDSCAPE PERMITS. THE LOCATION FOR EROSION CONTROL MEASURES ARE SHOWN ON THE CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS. 2. ALL DESIRABLE TREES MUST BE RETAINED WHEREVER POSSIBLE. IT WILL BE REQUIRED THAT PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS (i.e. BUILDINGS, WALKWAYS, DRIVEWAYS, POND BANKS, DRAINAGE SYSTEMS, ETC.) BE ADJUSTED TO RETAIN DESIRABLE TREES. GRADE CHANGES MUST BE SENSITIVE TO TREES REMAINING. IN GENERAL, NO GRADE CHANGES SHOULD OCCUR WITHIN THE CANOPY DRIP LINE OF PINE TREES AND 213 THE CANOPY DRIP LINE OF HARDWOOD TREES TO BE SAVED. LANDSCAPING 1. EACH LANDSCAPING AND REPLANT TREE MUST BE PLANTED WITHIN A MINIMUM FIVE (5) FOOT BY TEN (10) FOOT OPEN SPACE PLANTER WITH SUITABLE GROUND COVER. LANDSCAPE TREES MUST BE PLANTED IN SAME VICINITY AS VEHICULAR USE AREAS IN ORDER TO BREAK THE MONOTONY OF UNBROKEN EXPANSES OF PAVING. TREES MUST NOT BE PLANTED WITHIN MAINTENANCE EASEMENTS. 2. THE USE OF XERISCAPE DESIGN MUST BE UTILIZED FOR THE REQUIRED LANDSCAPE DESIGN. THE DESIGN DEMONSTRATES THE USE OF A LOW VOLUME IRRIGATION SYSTEM, ORGANIC MULCHES, DROUGHT AND COLD TOLERANT PLANT MATERIAL, ZONING OF PLANT MATERIAL BY WATER REQUIREMENTS, SOIL AMENDMENTS (IF NECESSARY) AND THE PRACTICAL USE OF TURF. 3. NEW LANDSCAPING MUST BE PROTECTED FROM VEHICULAR MOVE- MENT BY WHEEL STOPS OR CURBING WHERE POSSIBLE, THE AREA BETWEEN THE BARRIER AND LANDSCAPE MATERIAL SHOULD REMAIN AS GREENSPACE. 4. LARGE TREE SPECIES PROPOSED FOR INSTALLATION MUST BE A MINIMUM OF 20 FEET AWAY FROM BUILDINGS, SIGNS, FENCES, LIGHT POLES, UTILITY LINES AND ANY OTHER OBSTRUCTIONS THAT MAY IMPAIR NATURAL GROWTH. 5. TREES PROPOSED FOR INSTALLATION MUST NOT BE IN CONFLICT WITH PROPOSED OR EXISTING UTILITY LINES OR STRUCTURES, EASE- MENTS OR OTHER AREAS WHICH MAY REQUIRE EXCAVATION IN THE EVENT OF SYSTEM FAILURE. THESE FEATURES SUCH AS THE WATER LINES MUST REMAIN OUTSIDE THE 5' X 10' PLANTER AREA. 6. SOILS WITHIN PLANTER BEDS MUST BE SUITABLE FOR PROPOSED PLANTED MATERIAL WITH REGARDS TO pH, SOIL TEXTURE, SOIL STRUCTURE, AND SEASONAL HIGH WATER TABLE. 7 ALL LANDSCAPE MATERIAL MUST BE FLORIDA GRADE /1 OR BETTER. 8. ALL REQUIRED TREES MUST BE A MINIMUM OF 10' HIGH, 2 -112" CALIPER AT TIME OF PLANTING. 9. ALL HEDGES MUST BE 24" HIGH AT THE TIME OF PLANTING, PLANTED AT 30" ON CENTER, AND BE MAINTAINED AT A MINIMUM OF 3' IN HEIGHT. 10. WHERE LANDSCAPE OR REPLANT TREES ARE PROPOSED TO BE PLANTED IN THE PERIMETER BUFFER, THE BUFFER MUST BE A MINIMUM OF 5' WIDE. IRRIGATION NOTES SPECIFICATIONS - WOOD BARRIER 1, MINIMUM RADIUS TO BE PROTECTED1 A. HARDWOODS - 2/3 DRIPLINE B, CONIFERS & SABAL PALMS - ENTIRE DRIPLINE, 2. UPRIGHTS - NO LESS THAN 2" X 2' LUMBER. 3. HORIZONTALS - NO LESS THAN 1' X 4' LUMBER, 4. BARRIERS SHALL BE ERECTED AROUND ALL PROTECTED TREES AND PALMS, AND INSPECTED BY CITY REPRESENTATIVE BEFORE CONSTRUCTION BEGINS. 5. UPRIGHT POSTS ARE TO BE AT LEAST 4 FEET IN LENGTH WITH A MINIMUM OF 1 FOOT ANCHORED IN GROUND AND 3 FEET ABOVE GROUND, 6. BARRIERS TO REMAIN IN PLACE UNTIL ALL PAVING, CONSTRUCTION AND HEAVY EQUIPMENT IS OUT OF AREA. FURTHER INFORMATION MAY BE OBTAINED FROM THE LAND RESOURCE SPECIALIST AT 562 -4741, 'RIGHT - . I,--, - TREE BARRICADES CLEARWATER INDEX No. 909, SH. 1 of 1 Rev. 4/09/03 N.T.S. 1. RECLAIMED WATER MUST BE USED AS A SOURCE OF IRRIGATION WATER. THE DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM FOR IRRIGATION MUST NOT BE CONNECTED TO COUNTY OR MUNICIPAL WATER SOURCES. 2. IRRIGATION SYSTEMS MUST UTILIZE LOW VOLUME DESIGNS SUCH AS LOW 1 RAJECTORY HEADS OR SOAKER HOSES TO PROVIDE DIRECT AP- PLICAT.I!1A1 AND LOW EVAPORATION. SYSTEMS THAT OVERSPRAY AREAS THAT DO NOT REQUIRE IRRIGATION, SUCH AS PAVED AREAS WILL NOT BE AL'CEPTABLE. HIGH IRRIGATION NEED AREAS MUST NOT OVERSPRAY LOW NEED AREAS. J. HIGH WATER DEMAND LANDSCAPE AREAS SUCH AS TURF MUST BE SERVED BY A SEPARATE IRRIGATION ZONE THAN LOW WATER NEED PLANTER BEDS, OR MULCHED AREAS WITH TREES. IN NO CASE, SHALL ANY f %.ANTED VEGETATION AREA BE MORE THAN 50' FROM A WATER SUPPLY HOSE BIBB. 4. AUTOMATIC IRRIGATION SYSTEMS MUST BE OPERATED BY AN IRRI- GATION SYSTEMS OPERATED BY AN IRRIGATION CONTROLLER CAPABLE OF DIFFERENTIATING BETWEEN THE SCHEDULES OF HIGH AND LOW WATER DEMAND AREAS CONTROLLERS MUST HAVE MULTIPLE CYCLE START CAPACITY AND A FLEXIBLE CALENDAR PROGRAM ABLE TO BE SET TO COMPLY WITH LOCAL OR WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT IMPOSED RESTRICTIONS. 5. AUTOMATIC IRRIGATION SYSTEMS MUST BE EQUIPPED WITH RAIN SENSOR DEVICE OR SWITCH WHICH WILL OVERRIDE THE IRRIGATION CYCLE OF THE SPRINKLER SYSTEM WHEN ADEQUATE RAINFALL HAS THE IRRIGATION CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE AN UNDERGROUND IRRI- GATION SYSTEM TO COVER 1007 OF ALL ON SITE PLANTING AREA. THIS SYSTEM SHALL CONTAIN BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE FOLLOWING: 1. UNDERGROUND PIPING, SHALL BE PVC SCHEDULE 40 OR BETTER. 2. SEVEN (7) DAY PROGRAMMABLE TIME CLOCK TO ACTIVATE ZONES. J. SPRINKLER HEADS COMPATIBLE WITH THE TYPE OF PLANTING. 4. ELECTRIC VALVES. 5. GAUGE 14 OF COPPER WIRE. 6. FIBERGLASS OR PLASTIC ZONE VALVE BOXES. i WHERE PIPING IS UNDER DRIVEWAY AND CONCRETE WALKS, THE PIPES SHALL BE INSTALLED IN SCHEDULE 40 SLEEVES 18" BELOW GRADE. MATERIALS SUPPLIED SHALL BE EQUAL TO THOSE MANUFACTURED BY RAIN BIRD CO. OR APPROVED EQUAL. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT A SYSTEM LAY -OUT ALONG WITH CATALOG SHEETS OF ALL COMPONENTS IN THE SYSTEM TO THE OWNER FOR APPROVAL PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. THE ENTIRE SYSTEM SHALL BE GUARANTEED BY THE CONTRACTOR FOR ONE YEAR FROM THE DATE OF ACCEPTANCE BY THE ARCHITECT/ ENGINEER. ANY AND ALL USE OF HOSE BIBBS IN ASSOCIATION WITH NON - POTABLE WATER SUPPLIES SHALL BE IN FULL COMPLIANCE WITH SBCCI STANDARD PLUMBING CODE, CHAPTER VI CRITERIA REFERENCE COLOR CODING OF ABOVE GRADE RISER PIPING AND LABEL /TAGGING OF OUTLETS AS NON- POTABLE WATER SUPPLY. ANY BUILDING TO BE DEMOLISHED IS SUBJECT TO NOTIFICATION TO THE AIR TOXICS SECTION OF THE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PRIOR TO ANY DEMOLITION OF BUILDINGS. PINES DRIP LINE FNITTRF TIRTP I TNIF XERISCAPING 1. ORGANIC MULCHES AND /OR DROUGHT TOLERANT GROUNDCOVERS WITHIN PROPOSED LANDSCAPE PLANTER BEDS. 2, DROUGHT AND COLD TOLERANT PLANT MATERIAL. 3. GROUPING OR ZONING PLANT MATERIAL BASE ON SIMILAR WATER REQUIREMENTS AND THE LOCATION OF PROPOSED IRRIGATION WATERING SYSTEMS. 4. THE USE OF SOIL TESTING TO IDENTIFY SOIL CONDITIONS NECES- SARY FOR THE CONTINUED SURVIVAL OF PROPOSED LANDSCAPING. 5. ORGANIC SOIL AMENDMENTS (SUCH AS TOP SOILS, MANURES, PEAT AND COMPOSTED MATERIALS) MIXED EXISTING SOILS WITHIN LANDS- CAPING PLANTER BEDS TO DEPTHS CONSISTENT WITH THE ROOT DEPTH OF PROPOSED PLANTED MATERIAL (USE ONLY IF EXISTING SOIL CONDITIONS WARRANT THESE AMENDMENTS). 6. THE PRESERVATION AND INCORPORATION OF EXISTING PLANT COMMUNITIES ON SITE INTO THE LANDSCAPE PLAN. 7 THE MINIMAL USE OF TURF GRASSES WHICH REQUIRE FREQUENT IRRIGATION. 8. LOW- MAINTENANCE DESIGN. TREE & SHRUB PLANTING DETAILS 1. THE ROOT MASS FORM OF EACH TREE PROPOSED FOR INSTALLATION SHALL BE BALLED OR BURLAPPED, BARE ROOT TREES ARE NOT AC- CEPTABLE. ALL NONBIODEGRADABLE WRAPPINGS WILL BE REMOVED AND BURLAP WILL BE FOLDED DOWN TO ENHANCE WATER ABSORPTION. IF WIRE BASKETS ARE USED IN CONJUNCTION WITH BALLED AND BURLAPPED TREES. THE FIRST FEW ROWS OF EACH BASKET WILL BE REMOVED AT THE TIME OF INSTALLATION. 2. SUPPORTING APPARATUS SHALL BE REMOVED AFTER 1 COMPLETE GROWING SEASON, ALSO THE FLEXIBLE ATTACHMENTS SHALL BE USED WHERE SUPPORT WIRES ARE WRAPPED AROUND TREE TRUNKS /STEMS TO PREVENT CAMBIAL DAMAGE, J. PLANTING HOLES ASSOCIATED WITH PROPOSED TREES MUST SLOPE (NOT COMPACTED) AND A MINIMUM OF 18 -24 INCHES WIDER THAN THE DIAMETER OF THE ROOT BALL. TREES SHALL BE INSTALLED SUCH THAT THE TOP OF THE ROOT MASS IS LEVEL WITH THE SURFACE OF THE PLANTING HOLE TREES SHOULD BE INSTALLED 3 - 5 INCHES ABOVE GRADE ON SITES CONTAINING CLAY. A 2 - 3 INCH LAYER OF ORGANIC MULCH MUST ALSO BE PLACED OVER THE ENTIRE SURFACE OF EACH PLANTING HOLE. TO PREVENT FUNGAL INFECTION MULCH SHOULD BE PULLED BACK A FEW INCHES FROM THE BASE OF EACH TREE. 4. IF ON SITE SOIL CONDITIONS ARE SUCH THAT SOIL AMENDMENTS WILL BE NECESSARY, THE PLANTING MUST INCLUDE SOIL MIXTURE THROUGHOUT THE ENTIRE SECTION OF EACH PLANTER AREA TO A DEPTH CONSISTENT WITH THE ROOT DEVELOPMENT OF PROPOSED PLANT MATERIAL. 5. PLANTERS ADJACENT TO OR WITHIN VEHICULAR USE AREAS MUST BE CONSTRUCTED SUCH THAT LIMEROCK, ASPHALT, CONCRETE OR ANY OTHER OBSTRUCTIONS DO NOT EXTEND UNDER THE SURFACE INTO THE PLANTING AREAS. 6. THE PRACTICE OF TREE TRUNK WRAPPING AND THE APPLICATION OF PAINTS /TAR ONTO PRUNED TREE BRANCHES IS NOT RECOMMENDED BY THE INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY OF ARBORICULTURAL. T Issue Date: 09/16/06 Revisions. No. Date Description Q 01 126/09 City Comments 8 0410G109 Drc Comments © 05/13/09 Drc Comments 0 0 's 0 Z 0 0 Z\ r Z� V ;�D' C." SZ, . BUTLER DESIGN GROUP, INC 4203 46TH AVE. N. ST. PETERSBURG, FL. 33714 PH 727 - 521 -1684, FAX: 727 - 527 -7422, E- MAIL: RONSPLANSOTAMPABAY. RR. COM DRAWN BY: RON BELKO ISA Certified Arborist: FL -5802A ISA Certified Municipal Specialist: FL -5802M FNGLA Certified Landscape Designer: D31 -66 FNGLA Certified Horticulture Professional: H31-6445 �I t LLJ 06 's U) Uj z LLI r CL V ;�D' C." SZ, . co aF ."o BUTLER DESIGN GROUP, INC 4203 46TH AVE. N. ST. PETERSBURG, FL. 33714 PH 727 - 521 -1684, FAX: 727 - 527 -7422, E- MAIL: RONSPLANSOTAMPABAY. RR. COM DRAWN BY: RON BELKO ISA Certified Arborist: FL -5802A ISA Certified Municipal Specialist: FL -5802M FNGLA Certified Landscape Designer: D31 -66 FNGLA Certified Horticulture Professional: H31-6445 �I t 's r