Loading...
FLD2005-07071K •n iw IdOMIL 3 11111,Q11!3w�11 Now s � L4M� 4t.`.Si:� 7 +�1-.r+�f ,1,R• ,y� 4 a . , f�qJ'', ::fit_ d-, r rT',.tw''ni3*{7':F rz. f s�os f( 1C'1 p • Ir cornt *woo-% 0 , 97 Ic Iry V Air i 2 Planning Department rr Ater' 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, Florida 33756 Telephone: 727- 562 -4567 • _, Fax: 727- 562 -4865 ❑ SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION • SUBMIT 14 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION including 1) collated, 2) stapled and 3) folded sets of site plans • SUBMIT APPLICATION FEE $ —_ -_ �ev CASE #: ------------------ - - - - -- DATE RECEIVED: RECEIVED BY (staff initials): ----------- ATLAS PAGE #: ZONING DISTRICT: LAND USE CLASSIFICATION: --------- SURROUNDING USES OF ADJACENT PROPERTIES: NORTH: --------------- - SOUTH: --------------- - -- WEST: ---------- - - - - -- - EAST: * NOTE: 15 TOTAL SETS OF INFORMATION REQUIRED (APPLICATIONS PLUS SITE PLAN SETS) FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION SAN 2 5 2006 Comprehensive Infill Project (Revised 12/30/2004) PLANNING DEPARTMENT ITv nF CLEARWATER -- PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT --- A. APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4- 202.A) APPLICANT NAME: MAILING ADDRESS PHONE NUMBER: ��2^%� 'i �J --- - - - - -- FAX NUMBER: �7Z7� Q =� -7 ------ - - - - -- PROPERTYOWNER(S): --- L: _�� jNom__ P- _- _T_1G_}('1�VJ__ p� (Must include ALL owners as listed on tht: deed — provide original signature(s) on page 6) AGENT NAME: MAILING ADDRESS: PHONE NUMBER: - -__ FAX NUMBER: _ CELL NUMBER: � V-7 -7 P"/ - 69q 3 __ _ E -MAIL ADDRESS: B. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4- 202.A) STREET ADDRESS of subject site: _ •_— L, K� (ZIAL— &U4—i LEGAL DESCRIPTION: t i l l __ —L_U 7> _ _ L _ (if notf l here I se no loc —r f thi nt in the submitte PARCEL NUMBER: -� =��= PARCEL SIZE: _ ?z4L =__ —__ (acres, square feet) l ^ - -� PROPOSED USE(S) AND SIZE(S): - j _Vl -} 1 (nu bar of dwelling units, hotel rolms or square footage of non II n .t. I I �'J . / �a —Se n "f__J/Jvi01 Try IS IMP (–IM --------------- -- use) DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST(S): _ - - -� Attach sheets and be specific when identifying the request (include all requested code deviations; e.g. reduction in required number of parking spaces, specific use, etc.) Page 1 of 7 - Flexible Development Comprehensive Infill Application 2005- City of Clearwater DOES THIS APPLICATION INVOLVE THE TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS (TDR), A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT. OR A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED (CERTIFIED) SITE PLAN? YES NO of yes, attach a copy of the applicable documents) C. PROOF OF OWNERSHIP: (Code Section 4.202.A.5) tJBMIT A COPY OF THE TITLE INSURANCE POLICY, DEED TO THE PROPERTY OR SIGN AFFIDAVIT ATTESTING OWNERSHIP (see page 6) D_ WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Corte Section 3- 913.A) Provide complete responses to the six (6) GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA — Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail: 1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties In which it is located. 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety or persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use. 4- The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. :F 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts, on adjacent properties. provide complete responses to the ten (14) COMPREHENSIVE INFILL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT. CRITERIA (as applicable) — Explain how each criteria is achieved in detail: 1. The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development is otherwise Impractical without deviations from the use, intensity and development. standards. 0 0 The development of the parcel proposed for development as a comprehensive infiil redevelopment project or residential infili project will not reduce the fair rnarket value of abutting properties. (Include the existing value of the site and the proposed value ofojtlh the improvements.) = RECEIVED The uses within the comprehensive infiil redevelopment project are otherwise permitted in the City of Clearwater. PLANNING DEPARTMEN CITY OF CLEARWATER 4. The uses or mix of use within the comprehensive infiil redevelopment project are compatible with adjacent land uses. 5. Suitable sites for development or redevelopment of the uses or mix of uses within the comprehensive Mill redevelopment project are not otherwise available in the City of Clearwater. 6. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a comprehensive Infrll redevelopment project will upgrade the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development The design of the proposed comprehensive infili redevelopment project creates a form and function that enhances the community character of the Immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. 8. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street parking are justified by the benefits to community character and the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole_ 9. Adequate off - street parking in the immediate vicinity according to the shared parking formula in Division 14 of Article 3 will be available to avoid on- street parking in the immediate vicinity of parcel proposed for development. 10. The design of all buildings complies with the Tourist District or Downtown District design guidelines in Division 5 of Article 3 (as applicable). Use separate sheets as necessary. 0. f E. STORMWATER PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design C Manual and 4- 202.A.21) A STORMWATER NARRATIVE MUST BE SUBMITTED WITH ALL APPLICATIONS. All applications that im addition or modification of impervious. surface, including buildings, must include a stormwater plan that demonstrates compliance the City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteria manual. A reduction in impervious surface area does not qualify as an exem to this requirement. if a plan is not required, the narrative shall provide an explanation as to why the site is exempt. At a minimum, the STORMWATER PLAN shall include the following: Existing topography extending 50 feet beyond all property lines; Proposed grading including finished floor elevations of all structures; All adjacent streets and municipal storm systems; Proposed stormwater detentionlretention area including top of bank, toe of slope and outlet control structure; A narrative describing the proposed stormwater control plan including all calculations and data necessary to demonstrate compliance with the City ma)r ual. Signature and seal of Florida Registered Professional Engineer on all plans and calculations. COPY OF PERMIT INQUIRY LETTER OR SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT (SWFWMD) PERMIT SUBMITTAL 7 ' (SWFWMD approval is required prior to issuance of City Building Permit), if applicable 1p� nowledgement of stormwater plan requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following): Stormwater plan as noted above is included Stormwater plan is not required and explanation narrative Is attached. At a minimum, a grading plan and finished floor elevations shall: be provided. CAUTION -- IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A STORMWATER PLAN AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 562 -4750. F. SUPPLEMENTAL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 4- 202.A) t,e' SIGNED AND SEALED SURVEY (including legal description df.property) — One original and 94 copies, Q,—FR-EE SURVEY (including existing trees on site and within 25' of the adjacent site, by species, size (DBH 4" or greater), and location, including drip lines and indicating trees to be removed) — please design around the existing trees; LOCATION MAP OF THE PROPERTY; ARKING DEMAND STUDY in conjunction with a request to make deviations to the parking standards (e. Reduce number of spaces). Prior to the submittal of this application, the methodology of such study shall be approved by the Community Development Coordinator and shall be in accordance with accepted traffic engineering principles. The findings.of the study will be used in determining whether or not deviations to the parking standards are approved; //_�,,G� DiNG PLAN, as applicable; �PPRELIMINARY PLAT, as required (Note: Building permits will not be issued until evidence of recording a final plat is provided); PY OF RECORDED PLAT, as applicable; G. SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4- 202.A) ORIGINAL • ITE PLAN with the following Information (not to exceed 24" x 36'): RECEIVED All dimensions; North arrow; JAN 112006 Engineering bar scale (minimum scale one inch equals 50 feet), and date prepared; Location map; PLANNING DEPARTMENT T Index sheet referencing individual sheets Included in package; Footprint and size of all EXISTiNG buildings and structures; CITY OF CLEARWATER Footprint and size of all PROPOSED buildings and structures; All required setbacks; All existing and proposed points of access; All rnnuired sight triangles: i Location of existing public and private utilities, including fire hydrants, storm and sanitary sewer lines, manholes and lift stations, gas and water lines; All parking spaces, driveways, loading areas and vehicular use areas; Depiction by shading or crosshatching of all required parking lot interior landscaped areas; Location of all solid waste containers, recycling or trash handling areas and outside mechanical equipment and all required screening (per Section 3- 201(D)(i) and Index #7011; Location of all landscape material; Location of all onsite and offsite storm - water management facilities; Location of all outdoor lighting fixtures; and Location of all existing and proposed sidewalks. GC , SITE DATA TABLE for existing, required, and proposed development, in written /tabular form: Land area in square feet and acres; Number of EXISTING dwelling units; Number of PROPOSED dwelling units; Gross floor area devoted to each use; Parking spaces: total number, presented in tabular form with the number of required spaces; Total paved.area, including all paved parking spaces and driveways, expressed in square feet and percentage of the paved vehicular area; Size and species of all landscape material; Official records book and page numbers of all existing utility Easement; Building and structure heights; impermeable surface ratio (LS.R.); and Floor area ratio (F.A.R.) for all nonresidential uses. ORIGINAL EDUCED SITE PLAN to scale (8' /z X 11) and color rendering if possible; RECEIVED S1�011 DEVELOPMENTS OVER ONE ACRE, provide the following additional Information on site plan: ' . JAN 112006 One -fact contours or spot elevations an site; Offsite elevations if required to evaluate the proposed starmwater management for the parcel; PLANNING DEPARTMENT All open space areas; Location of all earth or water retaining walls and earth berms; CITY OF CLEARWATER Lot lines and building lines (dimensioned); Streets and drives (dimensioned); Building and structural setbacks (dimensioned); Structural overhangs; Tree Inventory; prepared by a "certified arborist ", of all trees 8" DBH or greater, reflecting size, canopy (drip lines) and condition of such trees: H. LANDSCAPING PLAN SUBMITTAL. REQUIREMENTS- (Section 4- 1102..A) LANDSCAPE PLAN: All existing and proposed structures; Names of abutting streets; Drainage and retention areas including swales, side slopes and bottom elevations; _ Delineation and dimensions of all required perimeter landscape buffers; Sight visibility triangles; Delineation and dimensions of all parking areas including landscaping islands and curbing; Proposed and required parking spaces; _ Existing trees on -site and immediately adjacent to the site, by species, size and locations, Including dripiines (as indicated on required tree survey); Plant schedule with a key (symbol or label) indicating the size, description, specifications and quantities of all existing'and proposed landscape materials, including botanical and common names; Location, size, and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, indicated by a key relating to the plant schedule; Typical planting details for trees, palms, shrubs and ground cover plants including instructions, soil mixes, backflling, mulching and protective measures; Interior landscaping areas hatched and /or shaded and labeled and interior landscape coverage, expressing in both square feet and percentage covered; Conditions of a previous development approval (e.g. conditions imposed by the Community Development Board); Irrigation notes. REDUCED LANDSCAPE PLAN to scale (8 %s X 11) (color rendering if possible); {%►� IRRIGATION PLAN (required for level two and three approval); COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM application, as applicable. Landscape associated with the Comprehensive Landscape Program shall exceed minimum Code requirements to offset the areas where minimum Code will not be met. 1. BUILDING ELEVATION PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4- 202A_23) Required in the event the application includes a development where design standards are in issue (e.g. Tourist and Downtown Districts) or as part of a Comprehensive Infiil Redevelopment Project or a Residential Infill Project. Civ�BUILDiNG ELEVATION DRAWINGS -- all sides of all buildings including height dimensions, colors and materials; ❑ RZ-1:50CED BUILDING ELEVATIONS — four sides of building with colors and materials to scale (8' /z X 11) (black and white and color rendering, if possible) as required. J. SIGNAGE: (Division 18, SIGNS / Section 3 -1806) �j�,� A -L ❑ All EXISTING freestanding and attached signs; Provide photographs and dimensions (area, height, etc.), indicate whether they will be removed or to remain. Ail PROPOSED freestanding and attached signs; Provide details including location, size, height, colors, materials and drawing; freestanding signs shall include the street address (numerals) ❑ Comprehensive Sign Program application, as applicable (separate application and fee required). ORIGINAL RECEIVED 0 Reduced signage proposal (8'h X 11) (color), if submitting Comprehensive Sign Program application. K. TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY: (Section 4- 202.A.13 and 4- 801.C) PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER ❑ ude if required by the Traffic Operations Manager or his/her designee or if the proposed development: Will degrade the acceptable level of service for any roadway as adopted in the Comprehensive Plan. Will generate 100 or more new vehicle directional trips per hour and /or 1000 or more new vehicle trips per day. Will affect a nearby roadway segment andlor intersection with five (5) reportable accidents within the prior twelve (12) month period or that is on the City's annual list of most hazardous intersections. Trip generation shall be based on the most recent edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineer's (ITE) Trip General /Manual. The Traffic Impact Study must be prepared in accordance with a °Scoping Meeting' held with the Traffic Operations Manager and the Planning Department's Development Review Manager or their designee (727 - 562 -4750) Refer to Section 4=801 C of the Community Development Code for exceptions to this requirement. a ---A'c c sowledgemeni of traffic impact study requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following): Traffic Impact Study is included. The study must Include a summary table of pre- and post - development levels of service for all roadway leg and each,kurning movement at all intersections identified in the Scoping Meeting. Traffic Impact Study is not required. LZ CAUTION — IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 562 -4750. L. SIGNATURE: t, the undersign d, acknowledge that all representations made in this application true and accurate to the best of my knowledge and authorize it representatives to visit and photograph the property described n. is application. property owner or representative STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELL4S S)Vom. to nd subscribed before me this A� day of A.D. 20�— to me andlor by '7 _ ,f�L who is personally known has produced __ ;�� }} _ as Identification. c Notbry public, 4 CITY OF CLEARWATER. AFFIDAVIT TO AUTHORIZE : -AGENT 99%%'A7EA�v�� MACIPALvSERVICES BUILDING, PMEN SORTH MYR LE AVEUE, ADMINISTRATION FLOOR PHONE (727)- 562 -4567 FAX (727) 562 74576 1. That (l amlwe are) the owner(s) and record title holder(s) of the following described property: >/� N ORIGINAL -- - - --ice s,��{�._ (Address or General Location) 2. That this property constitutes the property for which a request for a:- JAN 112006 y1hat the undersigned (has /have) appointed and (does /do) appoin M-5 ��� as (his /their) agent(s) to execute any petitions or other documents necessary to affect such petition; 4. That this affidavit has been executed to induce the City of Clearwater, Florida to consider and act on the above described properi ; 5. That 'f(l /we), the undersigned authority, hereby certify that the foreg i and correct Property Owner Property Owner STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS r Before me the undersigned, an officer duly comm' "signed y tt la�ros f the_ �St, to of Florida, on this J day of s2s�.6 personally appeared 4V who having been first d sworn deposes and says that he /she fully understands the contents of the affid�vi} khs�t he /she signer My Commission'Expires: 1j-60 S: application forms /development review /Affidavit to Authorize Agent Public ts- ot) t' lei r # rx ) tJ,?iiOS £rlF'w �+ ;r ;3 4ir "L�ftY Pl blc"` So jc" & ean&g, � LETTER OF AUTHORIZATION This letter wiii serve as authorization for Housh Ghovaec with Northside Engineering Services, Inc. to act as an agent for C and to execute any and all documents related to securing permits and approvals for the construction, on the prone generally ocated at A lying within County, State 6 SIg—na Address of Prop&t Owner City/State/Zip Code hdoio- Print Name of Property Owner "' �RIGINAL Tele ho' n6 Number RECEIVED JAN 112006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER State �)z The foregoing instrument was acknowledge .before me this day County -7� of by/jAlyt-Lj(,��- as 01 who is personally known to me or who has produced as identification and who did (did not) take an oath. rICNALID M. A 1 MY ExY'MEL-: "lay 1�' 2 Notary Public Commission # (SEAL ABOVE) �ofl�� � (ImI4, Name of Notary Typed, Printed or Stamped) 0 • 1/23/2006 ORIGINAL FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION (Comprehensive Infill Project) RECEIVED Playa Del Sol Resort - 678 S. Gulfview Blvd. JAN 2 Z 2036 NES Project 40554 PLANNING DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST: CITY OF CLEARWATER To raze three of the four overnight accommodation buildings and redevelop the site as a mixed use project. The project will consist of 27 attached dwelling units, rental office space and a condo /concierge's office which will run as a "go to" service for owners whether it be. for finding a service, picking up medication or bringing around their car. As an amenity to the attached dwelling units the new development will provide a fitness room and club house. The total number of overnight accommodation units to be raised is 38. The site, based on the square footages of the non - residential use in the amount of 3,650 square feet supports 27 attached dwelling units. Currently our ground level parking (west side of the building) and part of the south -west part of the building is located over a parking easement (deed attached). The current existing parking easement to the west will 'remain. We are also adding to our site for the use by Walgreens a dumpster enclosure and dumpster pad. Please note the existing lot lines and the lot lines to be adjusted. We are requesting a deviation to the allowable height from 35' to 85' -1" to the flat roof with an additional 5.70' for the parapets. At reductions to the following setbacks are being requested: Front (East): From 15' to 0' to the dumpster From 15' to 10.3' to the building Front (North): From 15' to 0' to dumpster pad From 15' to 9.6' to the building Front (South): Currently, the Gondolier Restaurant/Walgreen's plaza has designated 2 parking spaces which are marked for building. A (Clearwater Beach Resort), the legal document is attached. Also, two additional spaces were provided in the back of the property. Upon redevelopment, there will no longer be shared parking. The overnight accommodation building will have use of parking . on site at the condominium building. A new lot line is being created behind Building A Improvements will be made to Building A as part of the development of the new building to provide a more compatible fagade. Additionally, the brick pavers which impede on the adjacent property to the west and the pavers located on the south. side of Building A along the Gulfview Boulevard will be removed and additional landscaping is proposed in both locations. Further, there are items located along the east side of Page 1. of 3 From 10' to 0' to trash staging From 10' to 7.4' to building From 10' to 8' to building From 10' to 0 to existing sidewalk & pavement Side (West): From 10' to 0' to pavement (SW) From 10' to 5' to pavement (SE) From 10' to 5' to pool deck Height: 35' to 85.08' to roof deck Currently, the Gondolier Restaurant/Walgreen's plaza has designated 2 parking spaces which are marked for building. A (Clearwater Beach Resort), the legal document is attached. Also, two additional spaces were provided in the back of the property. Upon redevelopment, there will no longer be shared parking. The overnight accommodation building will have use of parking . on site at the condominium building. A new lot line is being created behind Building A Improvements will be made to Building A as part of the development of the new building to provide a more compatible fagade. Additionally, the brick pavers which impede on the adjacent property to the west and the pavers located on the south. side of Building A along the Gulfview Boulevard will be removed and additional landscaping is proposed in both locations. Further, there are items located along the east side of Page 1. of 3 1/23/2006 Building A (concrete tank and covered concrete) which will be removed as well. The existing pool and deck will be removed and will be addressed by a separate permit request and submittal at a later date, the ISR calculations and drainage plan submitted takes into consideration the existing areas of both the pool and deck. GENERAL APPLICABLE STANDARDS (Section 3- 913.A) Additionally, it is understood by the applicant that any non - conforming signs will be removed as a part of this development proposal and any new proposed signage will be installed to meet all current regulations relating to signage including but not limited to height, area, design and placement. Any future proposed signage will require separate review and permitting. 1. The bulk, scale, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties are in conformity. To the north of the property are condominium units and townhomes; to the east is a retail shopping center along with office suites; to the southeast is a convenience store, to the west is a retail center and to the southwest is a restaurant. The proposed mixed use building will comprise of offices, overnight accommodations and condominiums. Across Gulfview Blvd. Enchantment Condominiums has been issued a Development Order to construct a 150' tower. Our building will be 85'1". Although we are not consistent in height with the units along Bayway, we are consistent with use and will be consistent on Gulfview Blvd. 2. The proposed site will not hinder or discourage development and use of adjacent land and buildings. The location of this site and its surrounding area is of mixed use. Bayway is a street of already developed and new construction of retail, restaurants and attached dwelling units. The proposed development will be of similar size and scale as the previously approved Enchantment development across the street from this proposed development. No values should be impaired to the surrounding buildings. 3. The project has been designed to ensure that the development will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use. The majority of the parking will be contained within the building footprint and all sight triangles are being met. The development plan provides for on- site retention. 4. The current use of this facility is a 41 unit transient usage site. The number of units is being reduced by 10 and therefore traffic will be approximately the same even though a restaurant and shop is being added to the site. Additional trip generations will not be created by this proposed development as the majority of the visitors will be pedestrian traffic or residence of the site. (See attached traffic study) 5. The property is located within and at the northern end of the "Clearwater Pass District" of Clearwater Beach. The project is welcomed in the Beach by Design. 6. The proposed redevelopment will improve the visual appeal of the vicinity as the proposed architectural style of the building is in color and appearance of Italian architecture. All parking and retention will be on -site and all sight triangles are being met and will provide for safe and efficient pedestrian travel. Page 2 of 3 1/23/2006 COMPREHENSIVE INFILL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT CRITERIA 1. Beach by Design describes the Clearwater Pass District as an appropriate location for high - rise condominiums and resort hotels as well as mixed uses. In order for our site to be conforming, we will be making a lot line adjustment on the southwest side of our building. This will pull the adjacent property out of our property line. The site has retained a parking easement to the west to support Walgreens parking. Due to the shape of the parcel . (T), variance requested needed to be made. The largest portion of the building has 2 additional (already developed) projects to the south. These buildings have a 3' setback to our property line. In order to keep the drive aisle at 24', which is per code, we had to ask for variances on the north and south sides of the property. As to the west property line, we have an existing parking lot easement which must be retained in order to not make Walgreens non - conforming for their parking count. The pavement is 0'. We maintained the easement for another parcels site. The reduction to the east is at a 10' setback. Although this is considered a "front setback ", it is a side street (not a major road). This is a very short block consisting of a retail shopping center and parking lot. 2. The current assessed value of the property, per the Pinellas County Tax Appraiser's office is $2,228,500.00. The applicant estimates that the value of the property after the proposed redevelopment will be approximately $45- 48,000,000.00. The value of the surrounding properties will be increased by the redevelopment of this project. 3. Attached dwelling, retail, overnight accommodations and services are all allowed uses in the "Tourist" zoning district. Such mixed uses are also appropriate uses per Beach by Design. 4. The proposed project is compatible with the high rise condominiums south of the proposed site such as Harborview Grande, Gulfside, and Shepherds along with the strip shopping centers running along Bayway and S. Gulfview Blvds. 5. No other sites are practical within the City for the developer for this mixed use project. 6. The development of the mixed use proposed for this site will upgrade the immediate vicinity. A new attached dwelling building and rentable office space, along with overnight accommodations will bring more visitors to this end of Gulfview Blvd. 7. The proposed redevelopment promotes the strategies and guidelines set forth in Beach by Design. The community will be enhanced with the redevelopment. New building; new uses are always an enhancement to any community. 8. The requested setbacks to the property are minor. Many of the attached dwelling units along Bayway have minimum front setbacks, our project is 105. The side setbacks are being maintained at 10' and will provide a nice landscape buffer while the rear of the property backs up to retail, 10' will be maintained and landscaped. 9. All parking will be contained on -site. The required parking spaces for attached dwelling units is 1.5 /unit, office is 4/1000 s.£ All these requirements are met. The site requires 75 parking spaces; to better serve the community this design provides 85 spaces. 10. The proposed project has been designed in accordance with Beach by Design guidelines. All new sidewalks are proposed for the site; mixed use is being proposed and will entice walk -up traffic. The density has not been maxed out on the project; we are consistent with other surround uses, such as offices, attached dwelling and overnight. accommodations. Page 3 of 3 • 0 1/23/2006 Building A (concrete tank and covered concrete) which will be removed as well. The existing pool and deck will be removed and will be addressed by a separate permit request and submittal at a later date, the ISR calculations and drainage plan submitted takes into consideration the existing areas of both the pool and deck. GENERAL APPLICABLE STANDARDS (Section 3- 913.A) Additionally, it is understood by the applicant that any non - conforming signs will be removed as a part of this development proposal and any new proposed signage will be installed to meet all current regulations relating to signage including but not limited to height, area, design and placement. Any future proposed signage will require separate review and permitting. 1. The bulk, scale, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties are in conformity. To the north of the property are condominium units and townhomes; to the east is a retail shopping center along with office suites; to the southeast is a convenience store, to the west is a retail center and to the southwest is a restaurant. The proposed mixed use building will comprise of offices, overnight accommodations and condominiums. Across Gulfview Blvd. Enchantment Condominiums has been issued a Development Order to construct a 150' tower. Our building will be 851". Although we are not consistent in height with the units along Bayway, we are consistent with use and will be consistent on Gulfview Blvd. 2. The proposed site will not hinder or discourage development and use of adjacent land and buildings. The location of this site and its surrounding area is of mixed use. Bayway is a street of already developed and new construction of retail, restaurants and attached dwelling units. The proposed development will be of similar size and scale as the previously approved Enchantment development across the street from this proposed development. No values should be impaired to the surrounding buildings. 3. The project has been designed to ensure that the development will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use. The majority of the parking will be contained within the building footprint and all sight triangles are being met. Thq development plan provides for on- site retention. 49 7,1 'A.4 w� �+�; + 3 coSo s� • cat 4. The current use iftthis facility is a 41 unit transient usage site. The number of units is being reduced bjtAO and therefore traffic will be approximately the same even though a most s dded to the site. Additional trip generations will not be created by this proposed development as the majority of the visitors will be pedestrian traffic or residen6 of the site. ee attached traffic stud 7 I <- 5. The property is located within and at the northern en o the "Clearwater Pass District" of Clearwater Beach. The project is welcomed in the Beach by Design. 6. The proposed redevelopment will improve the visual appeal of the vicinity as the proposed architectural style of the building is in color and appearance of Italian architecture. All parking and retention will be on -site and all sight triangles are being met and will provide for safe and efficient pedestrian travel. Page 2 of 3 — — — — — — — — n _RVAEi Ssvm _7AlYaAVM" Vd WA.9*,lE.6 slup .SIB, E) FA Or- Al I -TMf tRESS BN 11 F di Off—, �d -A 0 qm .......... — — — 7,99-Al (W%d)3,72Z.9TN ORI INAL ESS/ x�ss' PARKIK RECEIVED TRAFFIC & mENT R 6936, PGS. 520 ­5?6) JAN 112006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT C ITY OF CLEARWATER N IN3W3AVd I-IVHdSV ,ST <= (6C-9E SDd 'BE 'U'd) aw - - — - - — - JAIYaAVM WVd 0 IN3W3AVd I=> i lVHdSV ,ST Imay 0 0 C36 CU, it cci N 0, IN3W3AVd I-IVHdSV ,ST <= (6C-9E SDd 'BE 'U'd) AVA-AO-iHDIS 08 - - — - - — - JAIYaAVM WVd NVI(13W SSV*dE) 102 IN3W3AVd I=> i lVHdSV ,ST ld),00'4 21 (Nlaigm ng ila - -JAT7- PLANNING CITY OF E<3 "Ry � S7 ADDRESS #678 E LLF.E-6,75 L ol! 1 IV sj m vii r1cu r. z L! �a cjl cn 0 x O L-Jhi (W),99,171 (W,8d)3,lc,a8-8TN Ell F I— W> BUILDING'A': EAST ELEVATION RZ6v4, � I 1 ZI & *Z�a 0 1! ►* /1►i/aI►- V-4 1 Ali I►c� I►gI1 - -4 V./� ►�/ �/ /�: ►�/ /� /�1� ■ �/ �� i /�i ►ill �/ /i1 �� ►i/ �: �� -F1 -► i -/ /:►- ► -/ - 1 i ►-4 ►64/ 1 ► -4'I 64!66 1� -&! ►6� �-p -o -; 6� 644 64., -4 64 �; .� ��,1 1 ►� �-W4 4 r a 11 1 = :III =.II II m 11 11 111 II . 1: 31 rl -. -il -11 II: li ..:L'lll o P 111 'r 11 -,:I.. 111FAM; :MW i - 41410all 0019 7G� IMAI MI❑ICI 1 ululului�. ORIGINk RECEIVED JAN 2 51006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLWWATER • • ORIGINAL RECEIVED AN 2 5 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMEN CITY OF CLEARWATER 11!i Is. 19 11 i 19 ILI " a— 1-;; E., I on; n' 1-1 'fEuk I NO' —0 1 1. 1. q I IN -1 IIIIIIIIIIIIII.Ilus III In 111 l�,411 T-1 4 —�.,ww,, '1011 r--j 7. IOU am am am qu—.... FA MR Ma vini uiii pli ilurn: I 171717'.1's =1717 -.70% TAN F- V 1-171 am ON am am 7.7.11 IN! F1 10- 1 MR; 0 No &B M &M 'I I liverk loins an -%-70 .... . .. 1 Lip ----- -- ------------ - 17.7. ....IN am Is oil ■ 11151711 111 a in oil 1. rlru 17 F, f 1 1 J; z T, [1-1 11 1 kq r� r, k�j o�w r,. �Wo �4 r, 171 11,6 r� -:4 Ire —� nR• �- Eli, win M Li Q(W 1�1 1-� L I 11j, �j"�71F J: ■ ftj .. ..... amp - t Milli 1111A -Its P-10 I I PRIM-1 III Mimi! ■1p.."112111411 lau.6yului. III ............ ................. Fir Gt I gill Is Ill f lino Sign low ul, 111 1 i, Ell 10111 G to,. loin -lit pop Illli�� 111111, 1. .1, 1 111m1 vo;A Ir I -.-,.FrT TIFF -5r,=--L a "11111" I 7-m- .......... FIF-1 r- ......... .............................. M El MOPM L13 Mgxcgm 0 M W--q Wong 7,ml W.W. I Md 11 r R 11::::10111:: ::11W 11.941-0 Vs LKS. 11,111 oil 11111 11MEW.n. IEI'-! P1 111m: 1111: Mill Mor- am am am am ma ma nu nu IGMA -.7111-1-WEA11. OWN, rjn� rn1��1 -� MrA Mu INS NA D'/ 1 Mu ML jMTA 0 P1 . � �... d rICVfi'': ---�—=6-777 IN .......... HIM ...... i%-K - 'd 0 0 REtt: I M14 ,.,+ ,,..,, m �� uuul lunul ■ ur.i� ,,, .�� m �I uun ' '�t I - ■ 1111! H.: �'i,2 v "WEINNIM: an �_�..- -,i1,. , - -, -� _,- F1 i:: -- :1,i:, 2121.. 2121. Fi- i 1 7 1. 1 Pig M El MgMEM M 19921M 0 M :2121.. ......�''�!�� i rip "D 2121 OW'" 0 - I Ma - 1 m I I 11 loll, ..1111,21• 2121 11,11 1,11MEN: 111!ilnmj_ loll _j J111 _ _ , _ W_ loll pipsmol 11 10111 HE i T5.1 I 11 InE. . 7-:..j —r..-7. Ij 2121 PIMAN!" 75AW": Sim jj!w I ONE. I--1— ����u�n��n`���!f��!��..�- 2121.._- � -�.�� ���i .�.�..� ~� 2121.... �n� .�.,.. 2121.... . Iloilo _ _ _ __ - _,o ��;._. _..- :_::: _ tee_._..._ C- k Q Q _ _. _ __._� rr. ".f n raw ,?.. a. n7.,. Fit H i ... ... Fill .. .. 11111 .......... -9[ 1416 _ II II Ki WRip-p a �I.,:,�1,:.:..:.1:..:..1�1 -1 'Agowh p Q'41 r. ----------------- .............. L .r W W, p LAC �m fl, M�01. T-P. I - 4 i Im Aff��I- Irr-11i- 11 - -�- 6m �� �� I� � IIf'.� rib e I�1 1� TIE M [ ma - 1 INN, 'Ell L © © oilll REVAL �I OFFICES lamaj ISO I Ir O pl p G� ro ro RENTAL CONDO CONCIERGE OFFICE uc t— sca�am�u --► GROUND FLOOR FLAN ac�u. �re-o PIS Roth A mU � Qz rn U C)E �E� x 1 W pU+y �w ■■■ 0 t rr�i� AV MH 1 1 1 .NOV.05 CL • • 0 N d �u r 04-208 C A -01.1 • • © O O O ac.ua� vr-r -r r� narui ORIGINAL RECEIVED JAN 112006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER 0 • Eco C3 9 - � 0 E- ® 0 0 0 0 E- - - - - -� mom ° 001 0 y to p 9 1 I 3 , ril O tj 4 a ❑° F1110011 LA Trash LOB B LCONY Q EQUIP ENT FITNESS CENTER GAMEROOM REST ROC M � IGenaret 1 Fire ROOMS E -OP N TO LOBBY BELOW PUP p i g N ------------ ---------- �- ORIGINAL a a` RECEIVED 8 0 l n FLOOR PLAN 2nd FLOOR JAN 112006 o4 -2os TOTAL PARKING: 35 SPACES mom Mth V PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER A -01.2 i 0 Z 3 Q tj 4 a ❑° F1110011 LA Trash LOB B LCONY Q EQUIP ENT FITNESS CENTER GAMEROOM REST ROC M � IGenaret 1 Fire ROOMS E -OP N TO LOBBY BELOW PUP p i g N ------------ ---------- �- ORIGINAL a a` RECEIVED 8 0 l n FLOOR PLAN 2nd FLOOR JAN 112006 o4 -2os TOTAL PARKING: 35 SPACES mom Mth V PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER A -01.2 i 0 0 0 0 0 FLOOR PLAN : 2ND FLOOR, EXTENDED PARKING DECK IF WALM v -o No Nwth ORIGINAL RECEIVED JAN 112006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER 0 0 FLOOR PLAN 3rd FLOOR Wm Nath ORIGINAL �° "'° RECEIVED UNIT443 .......... 201 sq.ft. UNITt2 .............2184 sq.ft. UNITS4t6 .......... 2123 sq.ft. UNIT45 ..............1925 sq.ft. JAN 112006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER 0 0 t —LUUt'r,' t—'LAN `tth 1 -LUUtlz� N ORIGINAL """" ° RECEIVED UNITu1N9 .......... 201 sq.ft. UNIT48 .............2184 sq.ft. UNIT4100 .......... 2123 sq.ft. UNIT411 ..............1925 sq.ft. ip%'14 112006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER 0 FLOOR PLAN 5th FLOOR PIM KOM ORIGINAL RECEIVED UNIT413 #15 .......... 2631 sq.ft. UNIT414 .............2184 sq.ft. UNITu16t18 .......... 2121 sq.ft. UNIT#ll ..............1925 sq.ft. JAN 112006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER [�J 0 i' i i FLOOD` PLAN 6th Fl UNIT 4 19 t 20 ...........3012 sq.ft. UNIT 4 21a t 23a (Lower Floor) ........... 2111 sq.ft. UNIT 4 A t 23b(Upper Floor) ................822 sq.ft. Total ..............3539 sq.ft. _ooR 0 UNIT 4 22a (Lauer Floor) ........... 1919 sq.ft. UNIT 4 22b (Upper Floor) ........... 1919 sq.ft. Total ............ 3838 sq.ft �1 0 FLOOR PLAN: ith FLOOR �'" ORIGINAL W"� RECEIVED UNIT # 22b (Upper Floor) ........... 1919 sq.ft. UNIT # 22a (Lauer Floor) ........... 1919 sq.ft. Total ............ 3838 sq.ft. UNIT 4 21b i 23b (Upper Floor) ........... 822 sq.ft. UNIT # 24a 125a (Lamer Floor) ........... 3855 sq.ft. UNIT 4 26a t 21a (Lower Floor) ........... 1445 sq.ft. JAN 112006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER • • 0 ORIGINAL RECEIVED JAN 112006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER 0 FLOOR PLAN: 8th FLOOR PWm UNIT 4 24a t 25a (Lower Floor) ........... 3855 sq.ft. UNIT 4 26a t 21a (Lower Floor) ........... 1100 sq.ft. UNIT # 24b t 25b (Upper Floor) ........... 2823 sq.ft. UNIT 4 26b 121b (Upper Floor) ........... 2338 sq.ft. Total ............ 4418 sq.ft. Total ............ 4038 sq.ft. i LIN AWL R UNA ItL OCT 0 6 295-E PLANNING 8. ID 7CN 8016 OLD COUNTY ROAD No. 54 at . - _- .slrL]LLTB S ua y1?.. -0. 1%11 c PRO..:SSIONAL SURVEYORS AN ,PPERS NEW PORT RICHEY, FLORIDA 34653 OFFICE: 727 - 834 -8140 FAX: 727 - 834 -8150 SKETCH AND LEGAL DESCRIPTION: EXHIBIT "A" LEGAL DESCRIPTION: (INGRESS- EGRESS CROSS PARKING EASEMENT VACATION) A PARCEL OF LAND LYING IN SECTION 17, TOWNSHIP 29 SOUTH, RANGE 15 EAST, PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA AND BEING DESCRIBED IN THE OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 6835, PAGES 520 -526 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA. BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: A PORTION OF LOTS 9 AND 10, BLOCK B OF BAYSIDE SUBDIVISION No. 5, ACCORDING TO THE MAP OR PLAT THEREOF, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 38, PAGES 38 -39 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA. BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT 9, BLOCK B; THENCE ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID LOT 9, NORTH 18° 22'31" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 121.16 FEET TO A POINT ON THE ARC OF A CIRCULAR CURVE CONCAVE TO THE SOUTHWEST, HAVING A RADIUS OF 4820.00 FEET AND ALSO BEING THE SOUTHERLY RIGHT -OF -WAY LINE OF BAYWAY BOULEVARD NORTH; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE TO THE RIGHT, AN ARC DISTANCE OF 25.00 FEET AND A CHORD BEARING AND DISTANCE OF SOUTH 71° 28'34" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 25.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 18° 22'31" EAST, PARALLEL AND 25.00 FEET EAST OF THE WEST LINE OF SAID LOT 9, A DISTANCE OF 96.59 FEET (96.65 FEET DEED); THENCE SOUTH 70° 29'561" EAST, PARALLEL AND 25.00 FEET NORTH OF THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID LOTS 9 & 10, A DISTANCE OF 90.02 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 18'22'31" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 25.00 FEET TO THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 10; THENCE NORTH 70° 29'56" WEST, ALONG THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID LOTS 9 & 10, A DISTANCE OF 115.02 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. CONTAINING 5,286 SQUARE FEET, OR 0.1213 ACRES MORE OR LESS. NOTES: 1. BEARINGS BASED ON THE SOUTH LINE OF'LOTS 9 & 10. BLOCK B. ACCORDING TO THE MAP OR PLAT THEREOF, HAVING A BEARING OF NORTH 70 °29'56" WEST. 2. THIS IS NOT A BOUNDARY SURVEY, BUT ONLY A -LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF THE SKETCH AS SHOWW ON SHEET 2 OF 2 ORIGINAL RECEIVED JAN 112006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER 12/01/05 BRUCE A KLEIN DATE: PROFESSIONAL SURVEY AND MAPPER FLORIDA LICENSED No. LS 5052 INGRESS - EGRESS PARKING VACATION I JOB No. 03O155SK91 DATE: 12/01/05 1 SHEET: 1 OF 2 SHEETS WarisT &- .S-rATjia 7CNC PROi...z>SIONAL SURVEYORS AI APPERS 8016 OLD COUNTY ROAD No. 54 NEW PORT RICHEY, FLORIDA 34653 OFFICE: 727- 834 -8140 FAX: 727 -834 -8150 SKETCH AND LEGAL DESCRIPTION: EXHIBIT "A" BAYW_AY BOULEVARD NORTH 60' RIGHT -OF -WAY (P.B. 38, PGS. 38 -39) 36' ASPHALT PAVEMENT' a R- 4820.00' A- 25.00' 5' DRAINAGE, UTILITY & o CHID.- 25.00' — SIDEWALK EASEMENT /—CB -S71° 28'34 "E I O.R.B. 6958, PGS.423 -424 ff � N70° 29'56 "W 115.02' ` SOUTH LINE OF LOTS 9 & 10, BLOCK B LOT 19 LOT 18 LOT 17 BLOCK B BLOCK B BLOCK B POINT OF COMMENCEMENT ORIGINAL NORTHWEST CORNER LEGEND: OF LOT 9, BLOCK B P.B. 38, PGS. 38 -39 A = ARC DISTANCE CB = CHORD BEARING CHD. = CHORD DISTANCE P.B. = PLAT BOOK PGS. = PAGES R = RADIUS RECEIVED JAN 112006 ' PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER NOTES: 1. BEARINGS BASED ON THE SOUTH LINE OF LOTS 9 810. BLOCK B. ACCORDING TO THE MAP OR PLAT THEREOF, HAVING A BEARING OF NORTH 70 °29'56" WEST. 2. THIS IS NOT.A BOUNDARY SURVEY, BUT ONLY A SKETCH OF THE LEGAL DESCRIPTION AS SHOWN ON SHEET 1 OF 2. IGRESS- EGRESS PARKING VACATION JOB No. 030155SK.9 DATE: 12/01/05 1 SHEET: 2 OF 2 SHEETS SOUTHERLY RIGHT -OF -WAY LINE Cl N� N a ° N N 0 20 40 Z Qp ° - 10 N cD N_ C� W CT u° m LOT 9 LOT 10 BLOCK B BLOCK B M N rn rn rl - Comm, (n m Ln In —I 0 M 22 X cnZZ� • --i --A' Ln -u S70° 29'56 "E 90.02' . nom_ (n Z Z rn J N cD �N ON OW r+l ff � N70° 29'56 "W 115.02' ` SOUTH LINE OF LOTS 9 & 10, BLOCK B LOT 19 LOT 18 LOT 17 BLOCK B BLOCK B BLOCK B POINT OF COMMENCEMENT ORIGINAL NORTHWEST CORNER LEGEND: OF LOT 9, BLOCK B P.B. 38, PGS. 38 -39 A = ARC DISTANCE CB = CHORD BEARING CHD. = CHORD DISTANCE P.B. = PLAT BOOK PGS. = PAGES R = RADIUS RECEIVED JAN 112006 ' PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER NOTES: 1. BEARINGS BASED ON THE SOUTH LINE OF LOTS 9 810. BLOCK B. ACCORDING TO THE MAP OR PLAT THEREOF, HAVING A BEARING OF NORTH 70 °29'56" WEST. 2. THIS IS NOT.A BOUNDARY SURVEY, BUT ONLY A SKETCH OF THE LEGAL DESCRIPTION AS SHOWN ON SHEET 1 OF 2. IGRESS- EGRESS PARKING VACATION JOB No. 030155SK.9 DATE: 12/01/05 1 SHEET: 2 OF 2 SHEETS �]LIEICN Sr' S r A- UR sTJ� -y-l.' . '7, 7CNC PROFtSSIONAL SURVEYORS AN >PPERS 8016 OLD COUNTY ROAD No. 54 NEW PORT RICHEY, FLORIDA 34653 OFFICE: 727 - 834 -8140 FAX: 727- 834 -8150 SKETCH AND LEGAL DESCRIPTION: EXHIBIT "A" LEGAL DESCRIPTION: (CROSS PARKING EASEMENT VACATION) A PARCEL OF LAND LYING IN SECTION 17, TOWNSHIP 29 SOUTH, RANGE 15 EAST, PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA AND BEING DESCRIBED IN THE OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 6835, PAGES 1730 -1731 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA. BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: A PORTION OF LOT 9, BLOCK B OF BAYSIDE SUBDIVISION No. 5, ACCORDING TO THE MAP OR PLAT THEREOF, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 38, PAGES 38 -39 OF THE PUBLIC, RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA. BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT 9, BLOCK B; THENCE ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID LOT 9, NORTH 18° 22'31" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 121.16 FEET TO A POINT ON THE ARC OF A CIRCULAR CURVE CONCAVE TO THE SOUTHWEST, HAVING A RADIUS OF 4820.00 FEET AND ALSO BEING -THE SOUTHERLY RIGHT -OF -WAY LINE OF BAYWAY BOULEVARD NORTH; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE TO THE RIGHT, AN ARC DISTANCE OF 25.00 FEET AND A CHORD BEARING AND DISTANCE OF SOUTH 71° 28'34" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 25.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 18° 22'31" EAST, PARALLEL AND 25.00 FEET EAST OF THE WEST LINE OF SAID LOT 9, A DISTANCE OF 121.59 FEET; THENCE NORTH 70° 291561" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 25.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. CONTAINING 3035 SQUARE FEET, OR 0.0670 ACRES MORE OR LESS. NOTES: 1. BEARINGS BASED ON THE SOUTH LINE OF LOTS 9 & 10, BLOCK B. ACCORDING TO THE MAP OR PLAT THEREOF, HAVING A BEARING OF NORTH 70 °29'56" WEST.. 2. THIS IS NOT A BOUNDARY SURVEY, BUT ONLY A SKETCH OF THE ABOVE LEGAL DESCRIPTION. ORIGINAL RECEIVED JAN 112006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER. i 12/01/05 BRUCE A. KLEIN DATE: PROFESSIONAL SURVEY AND MAPPER FLORIDA LICENSED No. LS 5052 PARKING EASEMENT VACATION IJOB No. 030155SK.10 1 DATE: 12/01/05 1 SHEET: 1 OF 2 SHEETS �]LIEgN air _ S -rAUR SST -Yl- !3, ][NC PROFESSIONAL SURVEYORS AN aPPERS 8016 OLD COUNTY ROAD No. 54 NEW PORT RICHEY, FLORIDA 34653 OFFICE: 727 - 834 -8140 FAX: 727- 834 -8150 SKETCH AND LEGAL DESCRIPTION: EXHIBIT "A" BAY_WAY_ BOULEVARD NORTH 60' RIGHT -OF -WAY (P.B. 38, PGS. 38 -39) 36'ASPHALT PAVEMENT 0 R- 4820.00' A- 25.00' 5' DRAINAGE, UTILITY & o CHD.- 25.00' SIDEWALK EASEMENT CB -S71° 28'34 "E O.R.B. 6958, PGS.423 -424 SOUTHERLY RIGHT -OF -WAY LINE T —ul n 25.0' PARKING EASEMENT O.R.B. 6835, PGS: 1731 -1732 N� 0 20 40 cn o0 10 � N N N W L4 -+ se � rn j LOT 9 LOT 10 BLOCK B BLOCK B GO v m a w y (n (T1 vr*'�rn z LEGEND: Ln I,-) D � A = ARC DISTANCE ° �*1T. CB = CHORD BEARING N C) Z CHD. = CHORD DISTANCE rn P.B. = PLAT. BOOK PGS. = PAGES R = RADIUS SOUTH LINE OF LOTS 9 & 10, BLOCK B 25.00' N70° 29'56 "W LOT 19 LOT 18 LOT 17 BLOCK B BLOCK B BLOCK B POINT OF COMMENCEMENT NORTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 9, BLOCK B P.B. 38, PGS. 38 -39 ORIGINAL NOTES: RECEIVED 1. BEARINGS BASED ON THE SOUTH LINE OF LOT 9. BLOCK B, ACCORDING TO THE MAP OR PLAT THEREOF, HAVING A BEARING OF NORTH 70 °29'56" WEST. OT JAN 112006 2. THIS IS NOT ASBOUNDARONSURVET,1BUT ONLY A SKETCH OF THE LEGAL 2. PLANN DEPARTMENT LEARWA ER CjTy OF PARKING EASEMENT VACATION -JOB No. 030155SKAOI DATE: .12/01/05 I SHEET: 2 OF 2 SHEETS P.O.C. SOUTHEAST CORNER 0,28' OF LOT 16, BLOCK B N72° 46'57 "W P.B. 38, PGS. 38 -39 14.90' N20° 37'52 "E 60' RIGHT -OF -WAY (P.B. 38, PGS. 38 -39) SOUTH GULFVIEW BOULEVARD LEGAL DESCRIPTION: (WALKWAY EASEMENT VACATION) A PARCEL OF LAND LYING IN SECTION 17, TOWNSHIP 29 SOUTH, RANGE 15 EAST, PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA AND BEING DESCRIBED IN THE OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK. 10971, PAGES 408 -410 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA. BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: A PORTION OF LOT 16, BLOCK B OF BAYSIDE SUBDIVISION No. 5, ACCORDING TO THE MAP OR PLAT THEREOF, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 38, PAGES 38-39 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA. BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCE AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT 16, BLOCK BI THENCE NORTH 20° 37'52" EAST, ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID LOT 16, A DISTANCE OF 14.90 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING: THENCE NORTH 72° 46157" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 0.28 FEET, THENCE NORTH 17° 37'02" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 36.81 FEET: THENCE NORTH 70° 26'44" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 0.55 FEET; THENCE NORTH 19° 33'16" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 41.20 FEET: THENCE SOUTH 70° 27'38" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 3.54 FEET TO A POINT ON THE EAST LINE OF SAID LOT 16: THENCE SOUTH 20° 37'52" EAST, ALONG SAID EAST LINE, A DISTANCE OF 77.96 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. CONTAINING 176 SQUARE FEET, OR 0.0040 ACRES MORE OR LESS. NOTES: 1. BEARINGS BASED ON THE EAST LINE OF LOT 16, BLOCK B, ACCORDING TO THE MAP OR PLAT THEREOF, HAVING A BEARING OF NORTH 20 037'52" EAST.. 2. THIS IS NOT A BOUNDARY SURVEY., BUT ONLY A SKETCH OF THE ABOVE LEGAL DESCRIPTION. ORIGINAL RECEIVED JAN 11 2006 r PLANNING DEPARTMENT I � 12/05/05 CITY OF CLEARWATE R BRUCE A. KLEIN DATE: PROFESSIONAL SURVEY AND MAPPER FLORIDA LICENSED No. LS 5052 WALKWAY EASEMENT VACATION JOB No. 030155SK.12 I DATE: 12/05/05 SHEET 1 OF 1 SHEETS 'ji- , ]CNC �]L]EICN & S'7CA -uia SgTH$'v "' PROFESSIONAL SURVEYORS Al APPERS 8016 OLD COUNTY ROAD No. 54 NEW PORT RICHEY. FLORIDA 34653 OFFICE: 727- 834 -6140 FAX: 727 - 834 -8150 SKETCH AND LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LEGEND: EXHIBIT "A" 3.54' O.R.B. = OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK S70° 27'38 "E P. B. = PLAT BOOK PISS. = PAGES EAST LINE OF P.O.B. = POINT OF BEGINNING LOT 16, BLOCK B P.O.C. = POINT OF COMMENCEMENT 0 N � d- UJI ip N '= LOT 16 LOT 15 No BLOCK B ;� BLOCK B rn v z cn N 0 20 40 0.55' z N70° 26'44 "W o ­4 10 °_' P.O.C. SOUTHEAST CORNER 0,28' OF LOT 16, BLOCK B N72° 46'57 "W P.B. 38, PGS. 38 -39 14.90' N20° 37'52 "E 60' RIGHT -OF -WAY (P.B. 38, PGS. 38 -39) SOUTH GULFVIEW BOULEVARD LEGAL DESCRIPTION: (WALKWAY EASEMENT VACATION) A PARCEL OF LAND LYING IN SECTION 17, TOWNSHIP 29 SOUTH, RANGE 15 EAST, PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA AND BEING DESCRIBED IN THE OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK. 10971, PAGES 408 -410 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA. BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: A PORTION OF LOT 16, BLOCK B OF BAYSIDE SUBDIVISION No. 5, ACCORDING TO THE MAP OR PLAT THEREOF, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 38, PAGES 38-39 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA. BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCE AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT 16, BLOCK BI THENCE NORTH 20° 37'52" EAST, ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID LOT 16, A DISTANCE OF 14.90 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING: THENCE NORTH 72° 46157" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 0.28 FEET, THENCE NORTH 17° 37'02" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 36.81 FEET: THENCE NORTH 70° 26'44" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 0.55 FEET; THENCE NORTH 19° 33'16" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 41.20 FEET: THENCE SOUTH 70° 27'38" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 3.54 FEET TO A POINT ON THE EAST LINE OF SAID LOT 16: THENCE SOUTH 20° 37'52" EAST, ALONG SAID EAST LINE, A DISTANCE OF 77.96 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. CONTAINING 176 SQUARE FEET, OR 0.0040 ACRES MORE OR LESS. NOTES: 1. BEARINGS BASED ON THE EAST LINE OF LOT 16, BLOCK B, ACCORDING TO THE MAP OR PLAT THEREOF, HAVING A BEARING OF NORTH 20 037'52" EAST.. 2. THIS IS NOT A BOUNDARY SURVEY., BUT ONLY A SKETCH OF THE ABOVE LEGAL DESCRIPTION. ORIGINAL RECEIVED JAN 11 2006 r PLANNING DEPARTMENT I � 12/05/05 CITY OF CLEARWATE R BRUCE A. KLEIN DATE: PROFESSIONAL SURVEY AND MAPPER FLORIDA LICENSED No. LS 5052 WALKWAY EASEMENT VACATION JOB No. 030155SK.12 I DATE: 12/05/05 SHEET 1 OF 1 SHEETS �lE7CN S�CA><T� S>< R'm -yIC." PROFESSIONAL SURVEYORS At NWPPERS 8016 OLD COUNTY ROAD No. 54 NEW PORT RICHEY. FLORIDA 34653 OFFICE: 727 -834 -8140 FAX: 727 - 834 -8150 SKFTCH ANTI I FGAI nFSCRIPTION: 0 Y U ' O J DO 0 LOT 9 I. BLOCK B 0 J L� 0 w J EAST 40.00' WES a, o F— F- O O J J w w 0 0 w w zz J J r r Q w w � r V) S70- 29'56 "E 75.00' w -- � R N� LOT 10 BLOCK B 5.00' I 0 =�� N70- 29'56 "W 75.00' t UTH LINE OF LOTS 9 & 10, BLOCK B BASIS OF BEARINGS SIDEWALK EASEMENT O.R.B. 7173, PGS. 1896 -1899 .TO BE VACATED LOT 18 LOT 17 BLOCK B BLOCK B LEGAL DESCRIPTION: (5.00' SIDEWALK EASEMENT TO BE VACATED) A PARCEL OF LAND LYING IN SECTION 17, TOWNSHIP 29 SOUTH, RANGE 15 EAST, PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA. BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: A 5.00 FOOT SIDEWALK EASEMENT, ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF LOTS 9 AND 10, BLOCK B, OF BAYSIDE SUBDIVISION No. 5, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 38, PAGES 38 -39 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA, SAID SIDEWALK EASEMENT DESCRIBED IN THE OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 7173, PAGES 1896 -1899 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA. BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: THE SOUTH 5.00 FEET OF THE WEST 35.00 FEET OF LOT 10 AND THE SOUTH 5.00 FEET OF THE EAST 40.00 FEET OF LOT 9, BLOCK B, BAYSIDE SUBDIVISION No. 5, ACCORDING TO THE MAP OR PLAT THEREOF, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 38, PAGES 38 -39 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA. CONTAINING 375 SQUARE FEET OR 0.0086 ACRES MORE OR LESS. NOTES: 1. BEARINGS BASED ON THE SOUTH LINE OF LOTS 9 & 10, BLOCK B, ACCORDING TO THE MAP OR PLAT THEREOF, HAVING A BEARING OF NORTH 70 °29'56" WEST. 2. THIS IS NOT A BOUNDARY SURVEY, BUT ONLY A SKETCH OF THE ABOVE LEGAL DESCRIPTION. LEGEND: O.R.B. = OFFICIAL RECORDS BODK P.B. = PLAT BDOK PGS. = PAGES P.O.B. = POINT OF BEGINNING P.O.C. = POINT OF COMMENCEMENT i 11/02/05 BRUCE A. KLEIN I DATE PROFESSIONAL SURVEY AND MAPPER FLORIDA LICENSED No, LS 5052. SIDEWALK EASEMENT VACATION JOB No. 030155SK.4 DATE 11/02/05 SHEET 1 OF 1 SHEETS 8016 OLD COUNTY RDAD No. 54 v1� a No an ,r.A T. R 8-JII2 yu �, ]CNC PROFESSIONAL SURVEYORS Al: �PPERS NEW PORT RICHEY. FLORIDA 34653 OFFICE: 727 -834 -8140 FAX: 727- 834 -8150 SKETCH AND LEGAL DESCRIPTION: EXHIBIT "A" 0 20 40 10 BAYWAY BOULEVARD NORTH 60' RIGHT -OF -WAY (P.B. 38, PGS. 38 -39) 36'ASPHALT PAVEMENT 5' DRAINAGE, UTILITY & SIDEWALK EASEMENT O.R.B. 6958; PGS.423 -424 R =4820.00' A =25.00' POINT OF CHD.= 25.00' BEGINNING CB -S71° 28'34 "E R- 4820.00' A- 10.00' CHD.- 10.00' GCB -S71° 16'13 "E 0 0 M SOUTHERLY RIGHT -OF -WAY LINE 10.00' N18° 40'21 "W 10.00' 10.00' POINT OF COMMENCEMENT N71° 16'13 "W S18° 40'21 "E LOT 10 NORTHWEST CORNER BLOCK B OF LOT 9,BLOCK B LOT 9 P.B. 38, PGS. 38 -39 BLOCK B LEGAL DESCRIPTION: (PROPOSED NORTH DUMPSTER PAD) A PARCEL OF LAND LYING IN SECTION 17, TOWNSHIP 29 SOUTH, RANGE 15 EAST, PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA. BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: A PORTION OF LOTS 9, BLOCK B OF BAYSIDE SUBDIVISION No. 5, ACCORDING TO THE MAP OR PLAT THEREOF, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 38, PAGES 38 -39 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA. BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCE AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT 9, BLOCK B, SAID POINT BEING ON THE ARC OF A CIRCULAR CURVE CONCAVE TO THE SOUTHWEST, HAVING A RADIUS OF 4820.00 FEET AND ALSO BEING THE SOUTHERLY RIGHT -OF -WAY LINE OF BAYWAY BOULEVARD NORTH; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE TO THE RIGHT, AN ARC DISTANCE OF 25.00 FEET AND A CHORD BEARING AND DISTANCE OF SOUTH 71° 28'34" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 25.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUE ALONG SAID CURVE, HAVING A RADIUS OF 4820.00 FEET AN ARC DISTANCE OF 10.00 FEET, AND A CHORD BEARING AND DISTANCE OF SOUTH 71° 16'13 EAST, A DISTANCE OF 10.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 181 40'21" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 10.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 71° 16'13" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 10.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 18° 40'21" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 10.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. CONTAINING 100 SQUARE FEET, OR 0.0023 ACRES MORE OR LESS. NOTES: 1. BEARINGS BASED ON THE SOUTH LINE OF LOTS 9 8 10, BLOCK B, ACCORDING TO THE MAP OR PLAT THEREOF, HAVING A BEARING OF NORTH 70 °29 56 WEST. 2. THIS IS NOT A BOUNDARY SURVEY, BUT ONLY A SKETCH OF THE ABOVE LEGAL DESCRIPTION. LEGEND: A = ARC DISTANCE CB = CHORD BEARING CHO. = CHORD DISTANCE P.B. = PLAT BOOK PGS. = PAGES R = RADIUS BRUCE A. KLEIN PROFESSIONAL SUAVE! AND MAPPER FLORIDA LICENSED No. LS 5052 12/01/05 DATE: ORIGINAL RECEIVED JAN 112006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER PRnPnSFn nIIMPSTFR (N0RTH) ')OR No. 030155SK.8 I nATF: »/01/051 SHEET: 1 OF 1 SHEETS WIE]CN &r S r AJJIa S1<JaWYl- -G, ]CNC PRO[— S I ONAL SURVEYORS At APPERS 8016 OLD COUNTY ROAD No. 54 NEW PORT RICHEY. FLORIDA 34653 OFFICE: 727 -834 -8140 FAX: 727 - 834 -8150 LOT 8 BLOCK B POINT OF BEGINNING 3.507 N18° 22'31 "E LOT 19 BLOCK B SKETCH AND LEGAL DESCRIPTION: EXHIBIT "A" o_ DY LOT 9 zvo BLOCK B J DO DO I— o w f... 3:0 J — 5 .00' N16° 22'31 "E S70° 19'36 "E 99.72' N70° 29'56 11W 99.62' N 0 b LOT 10 No BLOCK B . 0 20 40 10 SOUTH LINE OF LOTS 9'& 10, BLOCK B BASIS OF BEARINGS POINT OF COMMENCE SOUTHWEST CORNER LOT 17 OF LOT 9, BLOCK B BLOCK B P.B. 38, PGS. 38 -39 LOT 18 BLOCK B LEGAL DESCRIPTION: (PROPOSED SIDEWALK EASEMENT) -5.00, 9° 30'04 "W A PARCEL OF LAND LYING IN SECTION 17, TOWNSHIP 29 SOUTH; RANGE 15 EAST, PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA. BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: A PORTION OF LOTS 9 AND 10, BLOCK B OF BAYSIDE SUBDIVISION No. 5, ACCORDING TO THE MAP OR PLAT THEREOF, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 38, PAGES 38 -39 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA. BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCE AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT 9, BLOCK B; THENCE .NORTH 18° 22'31" EAST, ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID LOT 9, A DISTANCE OF 3.50 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUE ALONG SAID WEST LINE, NORTH 18° 22'31" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 5.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 70° 19136" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 99.72 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 19° 30'04" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 5.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 70° 19'36" WEST, A DISTANCE .OF 99.62 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. CONTAINING 498 SQUARE FEET, OR 0.0114 ACRES MORE OR LESS. NOTES: 1. BEARINGS BASED ON THE SOUTH LINE OF LOTS 9 & 10, BLOCK B. ACCORDING TO THE MAP OR PLAT THEREOF, HAVING A BEARING OF NORTH 70 °2956" WEST. 2. THIS IS NOT A BOUNDARY SURVEY, BUT ONLY A SKETCH OF THE ABOVE LEGAL DESCRIPTION. LEGEND: ORIGINAL P.B. = PLAT BOOK RECEIVED PGS. = PAGES JAN 112006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER 12/01/05 BRUCE A. KLEIN DATE: PROFESSIONAL. SURVEY AND MAPPER FLORIDA LICENSED No. LS 50E2 PRnPn'z�Fn S10FWAI K FASFMFNT I JOR Nn. 030155SK.6 F OATF: 12/01/05 I SHEET: 1 OF 1 SHEETS w]L.IEICN & s- A uB S><JI]EY7[" TG, ]CNC PROt -SS I ONAL SURVEYORS Ai IAPPER:, 8016 OLD COUNTY ROAD No. 54 NEW PORT RICHEY. FLORIDA 34653 OFFICE: 727 -834 -8140 FAX: 727- 834 -8150 SKETCH AND LEGAL DESCRIPTION: EXHIBIT "A" O_ LOT 8 0y LOT 9 BLOCK B z vo BLOCK B J J m (n o w �o 3.50' N18° 22'31 "E S700 19'36"E 112.12' n m LOT 10 No BLOCK B 0 20 40 10 3.16' S19° 30'04 "W - N700 29'56 "W 112.05' SOUTH LINE OF LOTS 9 & 10, BLOCK B BASIS OF BEARINGS POINT OF BEGINNING SOUTHWEST CORNER LOT 17 OF LOT 9,BLOCK B BLOCK B P.B. 38, PGS. 38 -39 LOT 19 LOT 18 BLOCK B BLOCK B LEGAL DESCRIPTION: A PARCEL OF LAND LYING IN SECTION 17, TOWNSHIP 29 SOUTH, RANGE 15 EAST, PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA. BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: A PORTION OF LOTS 9 AND 10, BLOCK B OF BAYSIDE SUBDIVISION No. 5, ACCORDING TO THE MAP OR PLAT THEREOF, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 38, PAGES 38 -39 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA. BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT 9, BLOCK B; THENCE NORTH 18° 22'31" EAST, ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID LOT 9, A DISTANCE OF 3.50 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 70-19-36" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 112.12 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 19° 30'04" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 3.16 FEET TO THE SOUTH LINE OF LOT 10 OF SAID BLOCK B; THENCE NORTH 70° 29'56" WEST, ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID LOTS 9 AND 10, BLOCK B, A DISTANCE OF 112.05 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. CONTAINING 373 SQUARE FEET, OR 0.0086 ACRES MORE OR LESS. NOTES: 1. BEARINGS BASED. ON THE SOUTH LINE OF LOTS 9 & 10, BLOCK B, ACCORDING TO THE MAP OR PLAT THEREOF, HAVING A BEARING OF NORTH 70 °29156 WEST. 2. THIS IS NOT A BOUNDARY SURVEY, BUT ONLY A SKETCH OF THE ABOVE LEGAL DESCRIPTION. LEGEND: ORIGINAL P.B. = PLAT BOOK PGS. = PAGES JAN 112006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER PROFESSIONAL_ SURVEY AVD MAPPER FLORIDA LICENSED No. LS 5052 PAR(:FI TAKING (SOUTH PROPERTY) IJOB No. 030155SK.5 DATE: 12/01/05 1 SHEET: 1 OF 1 SHEETS 12/01/05 BRUCE A. KLEIN ` �' DATE: PROFESSIONAL_ SURVEY AVD MAPPER FLORIDA LICENSED No. LS 5052 PAR(:FI TAKING (SOUTH PROPERTY) IJOB No. 030155SK.5 DATE: 12/01/05 1 SHEET: 1 OF 1 SHEETS LIE][N der S r.&.-TTB SltJR- oz][7`'%, ][NC PRO ..iSIONAL SURVEYORS Al PPER'- 8016 OLD COUNTY ROAD No. 54 NEW PORT RICHEY. FLORIDA 34653 OFFICE: 727 -834 -8140 FAX: 727 - 834 -8150 SKETCH AND LEGAL DESCRIPTION: EXHIBIT "A" 0 LL O Y W U ZO J i 07 �c LOT 8 wI- LOT 9 BLOCK B 3 of BLOCK B IS70 0.15'27 "E 10.00' 10.00' 10.00' N190 44'33 "E S19° 44'33 "W S70° 15'27 "E 7.80' 25.17' N18° 22'31 "E POINT OF 10.5'2 N70° 15'27 "W BEGINNING LOT 19 BLOCK B C� 'y n LOT 10 00 BLOCK B 0 20 40 10 -SOUTH LINE OF LOTS 9 1& 10, BLOCK B BASIS OF BEARINGS POINT OF COMMENCE SOUTHWEST CORNER LOT 17 OF LOT 9,BLOCK 8 BLOCK B P.B. 38, PGS. 38 -39 LOT 18 BLOCK B LEGAL DESCRIPTION: (PROPOSED SOUTH DUMPSTER PAD) A PARCEL OF LAND LYING IN SECTION 17, TOWNSHIP 29 SOUTH, RANGE 15 EAST, PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA. BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: A PORTION OF LOTS 9, BLOCK B OF BAYSIDE SUBDIVISION No. 5, ACCORDING TO THE MAP OR PLAT THEREOF, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 38, PAGES 38 -39 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA. BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCE AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT 9, BLOCK B; THENCE NORTH 18° 22'31" EAST, ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID LOT 9, A DISTANCE OF 7.80 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 70-19'36" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 25.17 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING: THENCE NORTH 19° 44'33" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 10.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 70° 15'27" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 10.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 19° 44'33" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 10.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 70-15'27" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 10.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. CONTAINING 100 SQUARE FEET, OR 0.0023 ACRES MORE OR LESS. NOTES: 1. BEARINGS BASED ON THE SOUTH LINE OF LOTS 9 8,10, BLOCK B, ACCORDING TO THE MAP OR PLAT THEREOF, HAVING A BEARING OF NORTH 70 °29'56" WEST. 2. THIS IS NOT A BOUNDARY SURVEY, BUT ONLY A SKETCH OF THE ABOVE LEGAL DESCRIPTION. ORIGINAL RECEIVED LEGEND: P.B. = PLAT BOOK JAN 112006 PGS. = PAGES PLANNING DEPARTMENT - CITY OF CLEARWATER r 12/01/05 BRUCE A. KLEIN ✓ DATE: PROFESSIONAL SURVEY AND MAP'ER FLORIDA LICENSED No. L': 5052 - CUCCT• I nr' I cuPCTc S°]C2.,'EJ]3 STJRV]E 'Y7[� , ][NC PROS ..�SIONAL SURVEYORS AND MAPPER 8016 OLD COUNTY ROAD No. 54 NEW PORT RICHEY, FLORIDA 34653 OFFICE: 727- 834 -8140 FAX: 727 - 834 -8150 SKETCH AND LEGAL DESCRIPTION: EXHIBIT "A" LEGAL DESCRIPTION: (INGRESS- EGRESS CROSS PARKING EASEMENT VACATION) A PARCEL OF LAND LYING IN SECTION 17, TOWNSHIP 29 SOUTH, RANGE 15 EAST, PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA AND BEING DESCRIBED IN THE OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 6835, PAGES 520 -526 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA. BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: A PORTION OF LOTS 9 AND 10, BLOCK B OF BAYSIDE SUBDIVISION No. 5, ACCORDING TO THE MAP OR PLAT THEREOF, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 38, PAGES 38 -39 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA. BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT 9, BLOCK B; THENCE ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID LOT 9, NORTH 18° 22'31" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 121.16 FEET TO A POINT ON THE ARC OF A CIRCULAR CURVE CONCAVE TO THE SOUTHWEST, HAVING A RADIUS OF 4820.00 FEET AND ALSO BEING THE SOUTHERLY RIGHT -OF -WAY LINE OF BAYWAY BOULEVARD NORTH; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE TO THE RIGHT, AN ARC DISTANCE OF 25.00 FEET AND A CHORD BEARING AND DISTANCE OF SOUTH 710 28'34" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 25.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 180 22'31" EAST, PARALLEL AND 25.00 FEET EAST OF THE WEST LINE OF SAID LOT 9, A DISTANCE OF 96.59 FEET (96.65 FEET DEED); THENCE SOUTH 700 29'561" EAST, PARALLEL AND 25.00 FEET NORTH OF THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID LOTS 9 & 10, A DISTANCE OF 90.02 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 180 22'31" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 25.00 FEET TO THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 10; THENCE NORTH 700 29'56" WEST, ALONG THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID LOTS 9 & 10, A DISTANCE OF 115.02 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. CONTAINING 5,286 SQUARE FEET, OR 0.1213 ACRES MORE OR LESS. NOTES: 1. BEARINGS BASED ON THE SOUTH LINE OF LOTS 9 8.10, BLOCK B. ACCORDING. TO THE MAP OR PLAT THEREOF, HAVING A BEARING OF NORTH 70 029'56" WEST. 2. THIS IS NOT A BOUNDARY SURVEY, BUT ONLY A LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF THE SKETCH AS SHOWN ON SHEET 2 OF 2 ORIGINAL RECEIVED r'.LEtk. DEC �y 13 2005 t PLANNING I)EP oc �0 CITY OF CLEARWrMENT r § 12/01/05 BR CE A. KLEIN / n DATE: PROFESSIONAL SURVEY' AND M415rER FLORIDA LICENSED No. LS 5052 INGRESS - EGRESS PARKING VACATION I JOB No. 030155SK.9 I DATE: 12/01/05 1 SHEET: 1 OF 2 SHEETS ]�]L]E][N S�°t4�Tl� S�T]EgV]E�][ �, 11 PR01�► SIONAL SURVEYORS AND MAPPE R 8016 OLD COUNTY ROAD No. 54 NEW PORT RICHEY. FLORIDA 34653 OFFICE: 727 -834 -8140 FAX: 727 - 834 -8150 SKETCH AND LEGAL DESCRIPTION: EXHIBIT "A" BAYWAY BOULEVARD NORTH — — -M 60' RIGHT-OF-WAY (P.B. 38, PGS. 38 -39) 36' ASPHALT PAVEMENT z .I OD 0 N N W J O m mU J 00 mM rn wycnm --' mxx ( (n -7 U) o Dn cn I C) z N CF) v R- 4820.00' A- 25.00' CHD.- 25.00' CB -S710 28'34 "E 00 0 N N W J cD O co W SOUTHERLY LOT 9 BLOCK B S700 5' DRAINAGE, UTILITY & — SIDEWALK EASEMENT O.R.B. 6958, PGS.423 -424 RIGHT -OF -WAY LINE V' C/ 00 0 20 40 10 LOT 10 BLOCK B '56 "E 90.02' N700 29'56 "W 115.02' SOUTH LINE OF LOTS 9 & 10, BLOCK B LOT 19 LOT 18 LOT 17 BLOCK B BLOCK B BLOCK B POINT OF COMMENCEMENT NORTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 9, BLOCK B LEGEND: P.B. 38, PGS. 38 -39 ORIGINAL A = ARC DISTANCE RECEIVED CB = CHORD BEARING CHID. = CHORD DISTANCE DEC 13 2005 P.B. = PLAT BOOK PGS. = PAGES PLANNING DEPARTMENT R = RADIUS CITY OF CLEARWATER z U1 CID N O N J rn NOTES: 1. BEARINGS BASED ON THE SOUTH LINE OF LOTS 9 & 10, BLOCK B, ACCORDING TO THE MAP OR PLAT THEREOF, HAVING A BEARING OF NORTH 70 029'56" WEST. 2. THIS IS NOT A BOUNDARY SURVEY, BUT ONLY A SKETCH OF THE LEGAL DESCRIPTION AS SHOWN ON SHEET 1 OF 2. IGRESS- EGRESS PARKING VACATION I JOB No. 030155SK.9I DATE: 12/01/05 1 SHEET: 2 OF 2 SHEETS PROM SIONAL SURVEYORS AND MAPPERS 8016 OLD COUNTY ROAD No. 54 NEW PORT RICHEY, FLORIDA 34653 OFFICE: 727- 834 -8140 FAX: 727 - 834 -8150 SKETCH AND LEGAL DESCRIPTION: EXHIBIT "A" LEGAL DESCRIPTION: (CROSS PARKING EASEMENT VACATION) A PARCEL OF LAND LYING IN SECTION 17, TOWNSHIP 29 SOUTH, RANGE 15 EAST, PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA AND BEING DESCRIBED IN THE OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 6835, PAGES 1730 -1731 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA. BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: A PORTION OF LOT 9, BLOCK B OF BAYSIDE SUBDIVISION No. 5, ACCORDING TO THE MAP OR PLAT THEREOF, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 38, PAGES 38 -39 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA. BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT 9, BLOCK B; THENCE- ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID LOT 9, NORTH 18° 22'31" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 121.16 FEET TO A POINT ON THE ARC OF A CIRCULAR CURVE CONCAVE TO THE SOUTHWEST, HAVING A RADIUS OF 4820.00 FEET AND ALSO BEING THE SOUTHERLY RIGHT -OF -WAY LINE OF BAYWAY BOULEVARD NORTH; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE TO THE RIGHT, AN ARC ,DISTANCE OF 25.00 FEET AND A CHORD BEARING AND DISTANCE OF SOUTH 710 28'34" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 25.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 18° 22'31" EAST, PARALLEL AND 25.00 FEET EAST OF THE WEST LINE OF SAID LOT 9, A DISTANCE OF 121.59 FEET; THENCE NORTH 700 29'561" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 25.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. CONTAINING 3035 SQUARE FEET, OR 0.0670 ACRES MORE OR LESS. NOTES: 1. BEARINGS BASED ON THE SOUTH LINE OF LOTS 9 & 10, BLOCK B, ACCORDING TO THE MAP OR PLAT THEREOF, HAVING A BEARING OF NORTH 70 029'56" WEST. 2. THIS IS NOT A BOUNDARY SURVEY, BUT ONLY A SKETCH OF THE ABOVE LEGAL DESCRIPTION. 00 BRUCE A. KLEIN,, ' /-g� �- PROFESSIONAL `/ s RV,x,.. A, I[� IOAo I FLORIDA LICENSED "'5.505 .: PARKING EASEMENT VACATION ORIGINAL RECEIVED DEC 13 2005 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER 12/01/05 DATE: ,JOB No. 030155SKAO I DATE: 12/01/05 1 SHEET: 1 OF 2 SHEETS 7E IL E][N 7C.&.,uB SuR vF, -Y][ *, ][NC PROM'SSIONAL SURVEYORS AND MAPPERS 8016 OLD COUNTY ROAD No. 54 NEW PORT RICHEY, FLORIDA 34653 OFFICE: 727- 834 -8140 FAX: 727- 834 -8150 SKETCH AND LEGAL DESCRIPTION: EXHIBIT "A" BAYWAY BOULEVARD NORTH 60' RIGHT -OF -WAY (P.B. 38, PGS. 38 -39) 36' ASPHALT PAVEMENT R- 4820.00' A- 25.00' CHD.- 25.00' CB -S71° 28'34 "E SOUTHERLY 5' DRAINAGE, UTILITY & — SIDEWALK EASEMENT O.R.B. 6958, PGS.423 -424 T RIGHT -OF -WAY LINE_ — PARKING EASEMENT O.R.B. 6835, PGS. 1731 -1732 LOT 9 BLOCK B SOUTH LINE OF 5.00' N70 2° 2956 "W LOT 19 LOT 18 BLOCK B BLOCK B POINT OF COMMENCEMENT NORTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 9, BLOCK B P.B. 38, PGS. 38 -39 NOTES: c� 0 v7 = ARC DISTANCE z o0 00 ° ° N N N N W 0 20 40 _ J O m �p x G -0 W I'1 J J � o� rn m -� L� rn a rri cn z V) cn�;u- o D� N G) In rn LOT 9 BLOCK B SOUTH LINE OF 5.00' N70 2° 2956 "W LOT 19 LOT 18 BLOCK B BLOCK B POINT OF COMMENCEMENT NORTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 9, BLOCK B P.B. 38, PGS. 38 -39 NOTES: c� 0 v7 = ARC DISTANCE n = CHORD BEARING r = CHORD DISTANCE P.B. = PLAT BOOK PGS. = PAGES NO = RADIUS 0 20 40 10 LOT 10 BLOCK B LEGEND: A = ARC DISTANCE CB = CHORD BEARING CHID. = CHORD DISTANCE P.B. = PLAT BOOK PGS. = PAGES R = RADIUS LOTS 9 & 10, BLOCK B LOT 17 BLOCK B ORIGINAL RECEIVED DEC 13 2005 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER 1.'BEARINGS BASED ON THE SOUTH LINE OF LOT 9, BLOCK B, ACCORDING TO THE MAP OR PLAT THEREOF, HAVING A BEARING OF NORTH 70 029'56" WEST. 2. THIS IS NOT A BOUNDARY SURVEY, BUT ONLY A SKETCH OF THE LEGAL DESCRIPTION AS SHOWN ON SHEET 1 OF 2. PARKING EASEMENT VACATION I JOB No. 030155SK.10 I DATE 12/01/05 1 SHEET: 2 OF 2 SHEETS `CAlUB SURV]EYl- I l[NC PROFtSSIONAL SURVEYORS AND MAPPERS 8016 OLD COUNTY ROAD No. 54 NEW PORT RICHEY, FLORIDA 34653 OFFICE: 727- 834 -8140 FAX: 727 - 834 -8150 SKETCH AND LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LEGEND: EXHIBIT "A" LEGAL DESCRIPTION: (WALKWAY EASEMENT VACATION) A PARCEL OF LAND LYING IN SECTION 17, TOWNSHIP 29 SOUTH, RANGE 15 EAST, PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA AND BEING DESCRIBED IN THE OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 10971, PAGES 408 -410 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA. BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: A PORTION OF LOT 16, BLOCK B OF BAYSIDE SUBDIVISION No. 5, ACCORDING TO THE MAP OR PLAT THEREOF, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 38, PAGES 38 -39 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA. BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCE AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT 16, BLOCK B; THENCE NORTH 200 37'52" EAST, ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID LOT 16, A DISTANCE OF 14.90 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 720 46'57" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 0.28 FEET; THENCE NORTH 17° 37'02" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 36.81 FEET; THENCE NORTH 700 26'44" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 0.55 FEET; THENCE NORTH 190 33'16" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 41.20 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 70° 27'38" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 3.54 FEET TO A POINT ON THE EAST LINE OF SAID LOT 16; THENCE SOUTH 200 37'52" EAST, ALONG SAID EAST LINE, A DISTANCE OF 77.96 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. CONTAINING 176 SQUARE FEET, OR 0.0040 ACRES MORE OR LESS. NOTES: 1. No BEARINGS BASED ON THE EAST LINE OF LOT 16, BLOCK B, ACCORDING'TO THE MAP OR PLAT THEREOF, HAVING A BEARING OF NORTH 20 037'52" EAST. THIS IS NOT A BOUNDARY SURVEY, BUT ONLY A SKETCH OF THE ABOVE LEGAL D E S C R LP"T l6'tt--, BRUCE A. KL PROFESSION FLORIDA LIC ANDS, MAPPER S 5052 12/05/05 DATE: ORIGINAL RECEIVED DEC 13 2005 J PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER WALKWAY EASEMENT VACATION I JOB No. 030155SK.12 I DATE: 12/05/05 SHEET: 1 OF 1 SHEETS 3.54' O.R.B. = OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK S700 27'38 "E P.B. =PLAT BOOK PGS. = PAGES EAST LINE OF P.O.B. = POINT OF BEGINNING LOT 16, BLOCK B P.O.C. = POINT OF COMMENCEMENT 0 N W (O LOT 16 M N LOT 15 r'o BLOCK B ;� a BLOCK B LAI v z cin N 0 20 40 0.55' N700 26'4 10 1�-4-4 .8. P.O.C.SOUTHEAST CORNE0.28' OF LOT 16, BLOCK N720 46'57 "W P.B. 38, PGS. 38 -39 14.90' N200 37'52 "E 60' RIGHT -OF -WAY (P.B. 38, PGS. 38 -39) SOUTH GULFVIEW BOULEVARD LEGAL DESCRIPTION: (WALKWAY EASEMENT VACATION) A PARCEL OF LAND LYING IN SECTION 17, TOWNSHIP 29 SOUTH, RANGE 15 EAST, PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA AND BEING DESCRIBED IN THE OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 10971, PAGES 408 -410 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA. BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: A PORTION OF LOT 16, BLOCK B OF BAYSIDE SUBDIVISION No. 5, ACCORDING TO THE MAP OR PLAT THEREOF, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 38, PAGES 38 -39 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA. BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCE AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT 16, BLOCK B; THENCE NORTH 200 37'52" EAST, ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID LOT 16, A DISTANCE OF 14.90 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 720 46'57" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 0.28 FEET; THENCE NORTH 17° 37'02" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 36.81 FEET; THENCE NORTH 700 26'44" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 0.55 FEET; THENCE NORTH 190 33'16" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 41.20 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 70° 27'38" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 3.54 FEET TO A POINT ON THE EAST LINE OF SAID LOT 16; THENCE SOUTH 200 37'52" EAST, ALONG SAID EAST LINE, A DISTANCE OF 77.96 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. CONTAINING 176 SQUARE FEET, OR 0.0040 ACRES MORE OR LESS. NOTES: 1. No BEARINGS BASED ON THE EAST LINE OF LOT 16, BLOCK B, ACCORDING'TO THE MAP OR PLAT THEREOF, HAVING A BEARING OF NORTH 20 037'52" EAST. THIS IS NOT A BOUNDARY SURVEY, BUT ONLY A SKETCH OF THE ABOVE LEGAL D E S C R LP"T l6'tt--, BRUCE A. KL PROFESSION FLORIDA LIC ANDS, MAPPER S 5052 12/05/05 DATE: ORIGINAL RECEIVED DEC 13 2005 J PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER WALKWAY EASEMENT VACATION I JOB No. 030155SK.12 I DATE: 12/05/05 SHEET: 1 OF 1 SHEETS PROFCSSIONAL SURVEYORS AND MAPPERS 8016 OLD COUNTY ROAD No. 54 NEW PORT RICHEY, FLORIDA 34653 OFFICE: 727 -834 -8140 FAX: 727 - 834 -8150 SKETCH AND LEGAL DESCRIPTION: V), Lu S700 29'56 "E 1 75.00' 5.00' 1 . N700 29156 11W 75.00' t I ,UTH LINE OF LOTS 9 & 10, BLOCK B BASIS OF BEARINGS SIDEWALK EASEMENT O.R.B. 7173, PGS. 1896 -1899 TO BE VACATED LOT 18 LOT 17 BLOCK B BLOCK B LEGAL DESCRIPTION: (5.00' SIDEWALK EASEMENT TO BE VACATED) A PARCEL OF LAND LYING IN SECTION 17, TOWNSHIP 29 SOUTH, RANGE 15 EAST, PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA. BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: A 5.00 FOOT SIDEWALK EASEMENT, ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF LOTS 9 AND 10, BLOCK B,, OF BAYSIDE SUBDIVISION No. 5, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 38, PAGES 38 -39 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA, SAID SIDEWALK EASEMENT DESCRIBED IN THE OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 7173, PAGES 1896 -1899 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA. BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: THE SOUTH 5.00 FEET OF THE WEST 35.00 FEET OF LOT 10 AND THE SOUTH 5.00 FEET OF THE EAST 40.00 FEET OF LOT 9, BLOCK B, BAYSIDE SUBDIVISION No. 5, ACCORDING TO THE MAP OR PLAT THEREOF, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 38, PAGES 38 -39 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA. CONTAINING 375 SQUARE FEET OR 0.0086 ACRES MORE OR LESS. NOTES: 1. BEARINGS BASED ON THE SOUTH LINE OF LOTS 9 8 10, BLOCK B, ACCORDING TO THE MAP OR PLAT THEREOF, HAVING A BEARING OF NORTH 70 029'56" WEST. 2. THIS IS NOT A BOUNDARY SURVEY, BUT ONLY A SKETCH OF THE ABOVE LEGAL DESCRIPTION. LEGEND: O.R.B. = OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK P.B. = PLAT BOOK PGS. = PAGES P.O.B. = POINT OF BEGINNING P.O.C. = POINT OF COMMENCEMENT, ORIGINAL RECENED DEC 13 2005 KLEf "` • •• • •p •�;. PLANNING DEPARTMENT i T CITY OF CLEARWATER 11/02/05 BRUCE A. KLEIN �{.� ie DATE: PROFESSIONAL' +SUi�'�Y. /NPJ SAPPER aY FLORIDA LICEN x I 'q� is, 505, SIDEWALK EASrhdt T-- V-AC'QTION I JOB No. 030155SK.4 I DATE: 11/02/05 SHEET: 1 OF 1 SHEETS C� r � o � Y 0) O J y U H O � OJ � O m -LOT 10 a; LOT 9 0 o BLOCK B ~o BLOCK B Z Z 0 20 40 J J J 0 o V) V) 10 U-1 Z Q EAST 40.00' w w WEST 35.00' I V), Lu S700 29'56 "E 1 75.00' 5.00' 1 . N700 29156 11W 75.00' t I ,UTH LINE OF LOTS 9 & 10, BLOCK B BASIS OF BEARINGS SIDEWALK EASEMENT O.R.B. 7173, PGS. 1896 -1899 TO BE VACATED LOT 18 LOT 17 BLOCK B BLOCK B LEGAL DESCRIPTION: (5.00' SIDEWALK EASEMENT TO BE VACATED) A PARCEL OF LAND LYING IN SECTION 17, TOWNSHIP 29 SOUTH, RANGE 15 EAST, PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA. BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: A 5.00 FOOT SIDEWALK EASEMENT, ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF LOTS 9 AND 10, BLOCK B,, OF BAYSIDE SUBDIVISION No. 5, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 38, PAGES 38 -39 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA, SAID SIDEWALK EASEMENT DESCRIBED IN THE OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 7173, PAGES 1896 -1899 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA. BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: THE SOUTH 5.00 FEET OF THE WEST 35.00 FEET OF LOT 10 AND THE SOUTH 5.00 FEET OF THE EAST 40.00 FEET OF LOT 9, BLOCK B, BAYSIDE SUBDIVISION No. 5, ACCORDING TO THE MAP OR PLAT THEREOF, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 38, PAGES 38 -39 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA. CONTAINING 375 SQUARE FEET OR 0.0086 ACRES MORE OR LESS. NOTES: 1. BEARINGS BASED ON THE SOUTH LINE OF LOTS 9 8 10, BLOCK B, ACCORDING TO THE MAP OR PLAT THEREOF, HAVING A BEARING OF NORTH 70 029'56" WEST. 2. THIS IS NOT A BOUNDARY SURVEY, BUT ONLY A SKETCH OF THE ABOVE LEGAL DESCRIPTION. LEGEND: O.R.B. = OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK P.B. = PLAT BOOK PGS. = PAGES P.O.B. = POINT OF BEGINNING P.O.C. = POINT OF COMMENCEMENT, ORIGINAL RECENED DEC 13 2005 KLEf "` • •• • •p •�;. PLANNING DEPARTMENT i T CITY OF CLEARWATER 11/02/05 BRUCE A. KLEIN �{.� ie DATE: PROFESSIONAL' +SUi�'�Y. /NPJ SAPPER aY FLORIDA LICEN x I 'q� is, 505, SIDEWALK EASrhdt T-- V-AC'QTION I JOB No. 030155SK.4 I DATE: 11/02/05 SHEET: 1 OF 1 SHEETS 8016 OLD COUNTY ROAD No. 54 v1 C� Vo &dhB -r k R S-E.TRV]E 'Y][A09 11--qC PROFtSSIONAL SURVEYORS AND MAPPERS NEW PORT RICHEY, FLORIDA 34653 OFFICE: 727- 834 -8140 FAX: 727- 834 -8150 SKETCH AND LEGAL DESCRIPTION: EXHIBIT "A" 0 20 40 10 BAYWAY BOULEVARD NORTH 60' RIGHT -OF -WAY (P.B. 38, PGS. 38 -39) 36'ASPHALT PAVEMENT 5' DRAINAGE, UTILITY & SIDEWALK EASEMENT O.R.B. 6958, PGS.423 -427 R- 4820.00' A- 10.00' R= 4820.00' A =25.00' POINT OF CH 71* 1 '13 CHD.= 25.00' BEGINNING CB -S71° 16'13 "E CB =S710 28'34 "E SOUTHERLY RIGHT -OF -WAY LINE POINT OF COMMENCEMENT NORTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 9, BLOCK B P.B. 38, PGS. 38 -39 1005 10.00' 10.00' N180 40'21 "W L-- ' .00 S18° 40'21 "E N710 16'13 "W LOT 10 LOT 9 BLOCK B BLOCK B LEGAL DESCRIPTION: (PROPOSED NORTH DUMPSTER PAD) A PARCEL OF LAND LYING IN SECTION 17, TOWNSHIP 29 SOUTH, RANGE 15 EAST, PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA. BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: A PORTION OF LOTS 9, BLOCK B OF BAYSIDE SUBDIVISION No. 5, ACCORDING TO THE MAP OR PLAT THEREOF, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 38, PAGES 38 -39 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA. BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCE AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT 9, BLOCK B, SAID POINT BEING ON THE ARC OF A CIRCULAR CURVE CONCAVE TO THE SOUTHWEST, HAVING A RADIUS OF 4820.00 FEET AND ALSO BEING THE SOUTHERLY RIGHT -OF -WAY LINE OF BAYWAY BOULEVARD NORTH; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE TO THE RIGHT, AN ARC DISTANCE OF 25.00 FEET AND A CHORD BEARING AND DISTANCE OF SOUTH 710 28'34" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 25.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUE ALONG SAID CURVE, HAVING A RADIUS OF 4820.00 FEET AN ARC DISTANCE OF 10.,00 FEET, AND A CHORD BEARING AND DISTANCE OF SOUTH 71016'13" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 10.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 180 40'21" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 10.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 71016'13" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 10.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 180 40'21" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 10.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. CONTAINING 100 SQUARE FEET, OR 0.0023 ACRES MORE OR LESS. NOTES: 1. BEARINGS BASED ON THE SOUTH LINE OF LOTS 9 810, BLOCK B. ACCORDING TO THE MAP OR PLAT THEREOF, HAVING A BEARING OF NORTH .70 °2956" WEST. 2. THIS IS NOT A BOUNDARY SURVEY, BUT ONLY A SKETCH OF THE ABOVE LEGAL. DESCRIPTION. LEGEND: A = ARC DISTANCE ORIGINAL CB = CHORD BEARING CHD. = CHORD DISTANCE RECEIVED P.B. = PLAT BOOK DE -C = -PAC CrC 13 2005 IV. = P� ,.• C j F ••.. !� `, PLANNING DEPARTMENT ' CITY OF CLEARWATER 12/01/05 BRUCE A. NK-EIN cam ` DATE: PROFESSiMfAL. SUO'�If,''-AND -MAPPER FLORIDA LI13EV, § .No. Lt,'6052 T—I PROPOSED DUMPSTER (NORTH) JOB No. 030155SK.8 DATE 12/01/05 SHEET 1 OF 1 SHEETS KII E][N SpCAL'LTB STJRVF,'Yl , ][N C PROF�!SSIONAL SURVEYORS AND MAPPER 8016 OLD COUNTY ROAD No. 54 NEW PORT RICHEY, .FLORIDA 34653 OFFICE: 727- 834 -8140 FAX: 727 - 834 -8150 SKETCH AND LEGAL DESCRIPTION: EXHIBIT "A" o_ LOT 8 o", LOT 9 BLOCK B Z vo BLOCK B J J m �- c U-1 I.- 3:o J POINT OF BEGINNING 5.00' /1418- 22'31 "E S700 19'36"E 1 3.50'—/ N180 22'31 "E LOT 19 BLOCK B N700 29'56 "W 99.72' 9.62' LOT 10 No BLOCK B " 0 20 40 10 �— SOUTH LINE OF LOTS 9'& 10, BLOCK B BASIS OF BEARINGS 'POINT OF COMMENCE SOUTHWEST CORNER LOT 17 OF LOT 9, BLOCK B BLOCK B P.B. 38, PGS. 38 -39 LOT 18 BLOCK B LEGAL DESCRIPTION: (PROPOSED SIDEWALK EASEMENT) — 5.00' 190 30'04 "W A PARCEL OF LAND LYING IN SECTION 17, TOWNSHIP 29 SOUTH, RANGE 15 EAST, PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA. BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: A PORTION OF LOTS 9 AND 10, BLOCK B OF BAYSIDE SUBDIVISION No. 5, ACCORDING TO THE MAP OR PLAT THEREOF, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 38, PAGES 38 -39 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA. BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCE AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT 9, BLOCK B; THENCE NORTH 180 22'31" EAST, ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID LOT 9, A DISTANCE OF 3.50 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUE ALONG SAID WEST LINE, NORTH 180 22'31" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 5.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 70019'36" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 99.72 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 190 30'04" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 5.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 70019'36" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 99.62 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. CONTAINING , 498 SQUARE FEET, OR 0.0114 ACRES MORE OR LESS. NOTES: 1. BEARINGS BASED ON THE SOUTH LINE OF LOTS 9 & 10, BLOCK B, ACCORDING TO THE MAP OR PLAT THEREOF, HAVING A BEARING OF NORTH 70 029'56" WEST. 2. THIS IS NOT A BOUNDARY SURVEY, BUT ONLY A SKETCH OF THE ABOVE LEGAL DESCRIPTION. LEGEND: P.B. = PLAT BOOK PGS. = PAGES .r' e i BRUCE A. KLEIN % J\ PROFESSION& - SURVVYL $Ab FLORIDA IIJC&1t 9-) •No.;LS- 50 ORIGINAL RECEIVED DEC 13 2005 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER 12/01/05 DATE: PROPOSED �tEiE -WALK EASEMENT I JOB No. 030155SK.6 I DATE: 12/01/05 1 SHEET :' 1 OF 1 SHEETS Sa Al1<T]� SURV]E -y*G, 7[NC PROr �SIONAL SURVEYORS AND MAPPER 8016 OLD COUNTY ROAD No. 54 NEW PORT RICHEY, FLORIDA 34653 OFFICE: 727 - 834 -8140 FAX: 727 - 834 -8150 LOT 8 BLOCK B LOT 19 BLOCK B 0 D Y �U �0 JJ m nc w� �0 I SKETCH AND LEGAL DESCRIPTION: EXHIBIT "A" LOT 9 BLOCK B 3.50' N180 22'31 "E S700 19'36 "E LEGAL DESCRIPTION: v1 C� r LOT 10 No BLOCK B 0 20 40 10 112.12' N700 29'56 "W 112.05' OUTH LINE OF LOTS 9 & 10, BLOCK B BASIS OF BEARINGS . POINT OF BEGINNING SOUTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 9, BLOCK B P.B. 38, PGS. 38 -39 LOT 18 BLOCK B 3.16' S190 30'04 "W. LOT 17 BLOCK B A PARCEL OF LAND LYING IN SECTION 17, TOWNSHIP 29 SOUTH, RANGE 15 EAST, PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA. BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: A PORTION OF LOTS 9 AND 10, BLOCK B OF BAYSIDE SUBDIVISION No. 5, ACCORDING TO THE MAP OR PLAT THEREOF, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 38, PAGES 38 -39 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA. BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT 9, BLOCK B; THENCE NORTH 18"22'31" EAST, ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID LOT 9, A DISTANCE OF 3.50 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 70-19'36" EAST, A DISTANCE, OF 112.12 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 190 30'04" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 3.16 FEET TO THE SOUTH LINE OF LOT 10 OF SAID BLOCK B; THENCE NORTH 700 29'56" WEST, ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID LOTS 9 AND 10, BLOCK B, A DISTANCE OF 112.05 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. CONTAINING 373 SQUARE FEET, OR 0.0086 ACRES MORE OR LESS. NOTES: 1. BEARINGS BASED ON THE SOUTH LINE OF LOTS 9 810, BLOCK B, ACCORDING TO THE MAP OR PLAT THEREOF, HAVING A BEARING OF NORTH 70 029'56" WEST. 2. THIS IS NOT A BOUNDARY SURVEY, BUT ONLY A SKETCH OF THE ABOVE LEGAL DESCRIPTION. LEGEND: P.B. = PLAT BOOK PGS. = PAGES a� ' KLE I N «� BRUCE A. K?EIN PROFESSIONAI_;SURVE'9- M'D MAPPER FLORIDA LICENSED- Flo. LS 5052 1. / �' ti t PARCEL TAKING? (SOUTH PROPERTY) ORIGINAL RECEIVED EEC 13 2005 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER 12/01/05 DATE: JOB No. 030155SK.51 DATE: 12/01/05 1 SHEET: 1 OF 1 SHEETS f KlC.]ElN S7CATJR SURN7 E'Yl ][NC PRO SIONAL SURVEYORS AND MAPPER 8016 OLD COUNTY ROAD No. 54 NEW PORT RICHEY, FLORIDA 34653 OFFICE: 727- 834 -8140 FAX: 727- 834 -8150 SKETCH AND LEGAL DESCRIPTION: EXHIBIT "A" 0 L� `- OY ) uj DJ LOT 10 No LOT 8 I- LOT 9 BLOCK B BLOCK B BLOCK B S70° 15'27 "E 0 20 40 10.00' 10.00' 10.00' N190 4433 "E S190 44'33 "W 10 S70° 15'27 "E 7.80' 25.17' N180 22'31 "E POINT OF 10.00' N70' 15'27'W BEGINNING SOUTH LINE OF LOTS 9 & 10, BLOCK B BASIS OF BEARINGS POINT OF COMMENCE SOUTHWEST CORNER LOT 17 OF LOT 9,13LOCK B BLOCK B P.B. 38, PGS. 38 -39 LOT 19 LOT 18 BLOCK B BLOCK B LEGAL DESCRIPTION: (PROPOSED SOUTH DUMPSTER PAD) A PARCEL OF LAND LYING IN SECTION 17, TOWNSHIP 29 SOUTH, RANGE 15 EAST, PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA. BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: A PORTION OF LOTS 9, BLOCK B OF BAYSIDE SUBDIVISION No. 5, ACCORDING TO THE MAP OR PLAT THEREOF, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 38, PAGES 38 -39 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA. BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCE AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT 9, BLOCK B; THENCE NORTH 180 22'31" EAST, ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID LOT 9, A DISTANCE OF 7.80 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 70019'36" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 25.17 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 19° 44'33" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 10.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 70015'27" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 10.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 190 44'33" WEST, A DISTANCE OF- 10.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 70° 15'27" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 10.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. CONTAINING 100 SQUARE FEET, OR 0.0023 ACRES MORE OR LESS. NOTES: 1. BEARINGS BASED ON THE SOUTH LINE OF LOTS 9 810, BLOCK B. ACCORDING TO THE MAP OR PLAT THEREOF, HAVING A BEARING OF NORTH 70 029'56" WEST. 2. THIS IS NOT A BOUNDARY SURVEY, BUT ONLY A SKETCH OF THE ABOVE LEGAL DESCRIPTION. LEGEND: P.B. = PLAT BOOK PGS. = PAGES _yv�LE 6••6A 1 ORIGINAL RECEIVED DEC 13 2005 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER 12/01/05 B UCE A. KLEIN_�' DATE: PROF'y'SS'iONAL SURVEY ANE,x MAP!SER FL @�4 140ENSED Va.:! �, 605 PROP � ' ERA (SL7UTH) JOB No. 030155SK.7 I DATE: 12/01/05 1 SHEET: 1 OF 1 SHEETS Gulf Coast Consulting, Inc. Land Development Consulting • Engineering • Planning • Transportation • Permitting COT Center 13825 ICOT Boulevard, Suite 605 Clearwater, FL 33760 Phone: (727) 524 -1818 Fax: (727) 524 -6090 June 28, 2005 Mr. Bennett Elbo City of Clearwater Traffic Engineering Division 100 S. Myrtle Avenue, #220 Clearwater, FL 33756 Re: Clearwater Grande #655 S. Gulfview Blvd. Dear Mr. Elbo: Per your discussion with Ms. Doreen Williams earlier this week it is understood the traffic analysis prepared in November 2004 was accepted, and demonstrated the impact of a 93 room resort hotel and 3,500 s.f. restaurant would be minimal. The report assumed 1,275 daily trips would be generated with 83 during the PM peak hour. The revised plan is for a reduced development of 68 attached dwelling units. Per ITE Trip Generation, 7th Edition Land Use Code 232 (High -Rise Residential Condominium) the revised project would generate only 284 daily trips of which only 26 would occur during the PM peak hour. This represents a substantial reduction in traffic impacts. We hope this information meets your needs. Please contact me if you have any questions. Sincerel Robert Pergolizzi, I Principal Cc Doreen Williams Steve Page 04 -074 PLANS Tree Inventory Clearwater Beach Resorts DtL 1 2 2nn6 As required by the City of Clearwater, I have completed an assessment of all trees (4" dbh or greater) on the subject site and within 25' beyond the property lines. My opinion is set forth below as to the viability (rating of 1 -5) and any potential hazards of these trees. 1 13" Sabal Palm 4 2 10" Live Oak 4 3 12" Sabal Palm 3 4 12" Sabal Palm 3 5 15" Washin tonia Palm 4 6 10" Live Oak 4 7 12" Live Oak 4 Co- dominate 8 10" Live Oak 3 Cross branching, In wires 9 10" Sabal Palm 3 Under canopy of tree #10 10 18" Live Oak 4 Co- dominate, Included bark 11 16" Live Oak 3 Co- dominate, Poor branching 12 12" Sabal Palm 3 13 16" Live Oak 3 Included bark 14 20" Live Oak 3 Poorly branched 15 10" Queen Palm 3 16 12" Sabal Palm 3 171 12" Washin tonia 3 18 10" Queen Palm 3 19 10" Queen Palm 3 20 10" Queen Palm 3 21 10" Queen Palm 3 ORIGINAL RECEIVED JAN 112006 pLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER 22 8" Queen Palm 3 28 23 8" Queen Palm 3 5" Drake Elm 24 8" Queen. Palm 4 3 25 8" Queen Palm 3 32 26 12" Washin tonia Palm 3 6" Live Oak 27 4" Live Oak 3 28 8" Washin tonia Palm 3 29 5" Drake Elm 3 30 6" Drake Elm 3 .31 5" Drake Elm 3 32 5" Live Oak 3 33 6" Live Oak 4 34 6" Live Oak 4 35 6" Live Oak 3 36 5" Live Oak 3 I affirm that my opinions have been made in good faith, with no coercion from others. I further affirm that I. have no interest with the parties or people involved with neither this issue nor any interest with regard to the outcome. Sincerely, Chuck Butler, Certified Arborist, Certificate #FL -1235A ORIGINAL RECEIVED JAN 11 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER 00- 201737 JAY- 7 -2000 1:30pm P INELLRS CQ':. QK 10971 PG 349 11111111 WAVE I I I 1 11111111111111111 Prcpared by /retum to: Nickolas C. Ekonomidea Ekonomidea & Associates, P.A SouthTtust Plaza 201 R. Kennedy Blvd, Suite 1130 Tampa, Florida 33602 R1 Z p1Nu R E(: tttY���l D70. S. fNT FEES MTF P/C REV i KARLEEN F. DE BLAKER, = OF COURT PIIELLAS C(1IAtTY, FLORIDA 80118317 07-07 -2000 13:31:34 01) 51 DED- ANASTAM ULGS 0000000000 III: B(: SPG: EPG: RECORDING 002 PAGES 1 $10.50 IOC STAMP - DR219 3 $10,745.00 TOTAL: $10,755.50 P CHECK AHT.TENDERED: $10,755.50 CHANGE: 5.00 BY -- -- DEPUTY CLERK j `S, TOTA S �.., WARRANTY DEED THIS WARRANTY DEED, Executed this l day of May 2000, by Elias Anastasopoulos, social security numb -t; - 3-) , whose address is 1600 Gulf Boulevard, PH -1, Clearwater, Florida 33Zb.7;.`ar4Gregory Politis, social security number s ~1eh- i-�g }whose address is 965 Bayshote Biiulevaid, South, Safety Harbor, Florida 34695,Togetller as Grantors, and SKTEL, Inc., whose address is .678 South Gulfview Boulevard, Clearwater, Florida 33767, together as Grantee. Wi:TNESSETH, that Grantor, for and in consideration of the sum of $10.00 in hand paid by Grantee;, the receipt and sufficiency whereof is hereby acknowledged, have granted, bargained, transferred xrld .$.pld unto Grantee in fee simple forever, all the right, title, interest, claim and demand which Grantor < have:.,in and to the following described lot, piece or parcel of land situate, lying and being in the County of °` Volu$ia, State of Florida, to wit: j LOTS 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 AND 15 M BLOCK B OF BAYSIDE SUBDMSION NO. 5, ACCORDING TO MAP OR PLAT THEREOF AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 38, PAGES 38 AND 39 PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the same together with all and singular tenements, hereditaments and appurtenances thereunto belonging or in anywise appertaining, and all the privilege, right, title, interest, estate, lien, equity and claim whatsoever of Grantor, either in law or equity, to the only proper use, benefit and behoof of Grantee in fee simple forever. SUBJECT to taxes for 2000 and subsequent years, and restrictions, easements and reservations of record. AND Grantor covenants with Grantee that, except as noted above, the grantor does fully warrant title to said land and will defend same against lawful claims of all persons whomsoever. RE EIVED JAN 1 2006 PLANNING jDEPARTMENT CITY OF MEARWATER IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Grantor has signed and sealed these presents the day and year first above written. "THIS IS NOT THE HOMESTEAD OF THE GRANTOR, ELIAS ANASTASOPOULOS WHO resides at : 1600 Gulf Blvd. PH -1, Clearwater, F1 33767 NOR IS THIS THE HOMESTEAD OF THE GRANTOR, GREGORY POLITIS WHO residea at: 965 South Bayshore Blvd., Safety Harbor, FL 34-695 SI ATE OF COUNTY L 0 P'NELLRS COUNTY FLA OFF .REC.6K 10971 pa 350 Elias Anastasopoulos Gregory P 1`4#94Y CERTIFY THAT BEFORE ME personally appeared Elias Anastasopoulos, who is Wrg nAlly' known to be the person described in the conveyance, or who produced a valid ' number as identification and who, did take 0 oath and di; owledged the execution of this instrument to be his free act and deed for the uses as therein expressed. , `-WITNESS my hand and official seal in the county and state last aforesaid this day of NIs; 2000. rt.Commission ,.Patricia J. Ceelen # CC 902313 '? Expires Feb. 15, 2004 Bonded Atlantc Bonding Co., Inc. . JRY O �State My Commission Expires: STATE OFFLORIDA COUNTY OFHILLSBOROUGH I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT BEFORE ME personally appeared Gregory Politis, who is personall+ y known to be the person described in the conveyance, or who produced a valid number as identification and who, did take an oath and acknowledged the execution of this instrument to be his free act and deed for the uses as therein expressed. ,,�e WITNESS my hand and official seal in the county and state last aforesaid this �/ Aday of May, 2000. Patricia J. Ceelen Commission # CC 902313 Expires Feb. 15, 2004 T Y PUBLI State of Florida >if� •dc`c Bonded Thru "400,`,, Atlantic Bonding Co., Inc. My Commission Expires: 7 JAI 112006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY O CLEARWATER HorthS LAND PLANNING ENVIRONMENTAL 5"ik"smaal loco TRANSPORTATION • STORMWATER REPORT FOR: Playa Del Sol 678 S. Gulfview Blvd 601 CLEVELAND STREET, SUITE 930 CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33755 N ESADMI N @MI NDSPRI N6.COM NESTECH@MINDSPRIN6.COM 727 • 443 • 2869 FAX 727 • 446 • 8036 ORIGINAL RECEIVED JAN 112006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER et��pitstrrt� ' � 11 i, ♦♦ /y "� �� is �� rt 4r+� :c_�,_ . f d w _ fa# ♦• s • `tI 1 Ft- h I��.•tltttt9p' t .. ,. i January 2006 Project No. 0534/554 PLAYA DEL SOL DRAINAGE NARRATIVE The proposed project is located in Clearwater, Florida (Section 17, Township 29 south, Range 15 east) at 678 South Gulf View Blvd. The project consists of the redevelopment of 47,215 sf of property and will include 4 existing overnight accommodation to remain and the new construction of 27 condominium units and offices with associated infrastructure improvements such as roadways, utilities, stormwater detention facility and landscaping. The existing site contains 28,334 sf of impervious and 18,884 sf of open space. The proposed site will contain 38,789 sf of impervious and 8,426 sf of open space. Discharge will be into the City of Clearwater stormwater system and quantity attenuation is provided for the 25 year storm event totaling a volume of 6,044 cf. For water quality purposes 1/2 quality treatment volume equal to 1,988 cf will be provided. Recovery of this volume will -be within 20.0 hours through 40' of underdrain. Because the quality volume is recovered in less than 36 hours, this volume can be used in the required quantity volume yielding a vault required total volume of 6,044 cf. The proposed retention vault provides a total volume of 6,160 cf between elevation 3.5 and the design high water elevation of 5.7. ORIGINAL RECEIVED JAN 112006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER PROJECT NAME: Playa Del Sol I PROJECT NO.: 534 EXISTING CONDITIONS TOTAL DRAINAGE AREA= 47,215 SF = 1.08 ACRES IMP. AREA= 28,334 SF = 0.65 ACRES POND AREA= 0 SF = 0.00 ACRES PERV. AREA= 18,881 SF = 0.43 ACRES CN CALCULATIONS PERV. AREA= TOTAL DRAINAGE AREA= 47,215 SF IMP. AREA= 28,334 SF OF IMP. AREA CN = 98 POND AREA= 0 SF OF POND AREA @ CN = 100 PERV. AREA= 18,881 SF OF PERV. AREA @ CN = 49 (LAWN IN FAIR CONDITION, HYDROLOGIC GROUP A) CN = 78.41 ORIGINAL C CALCULATIONS TOTAL DRAINAGE AREA= 47,215 SF IMP. AREA= 28,334 SF OF IMP. AREA @ C = 0.9 POND AREA= 0 SF OF POND AREA @ C = 1 PERV. AREA= 18,881 SF OF PERV AREA @ C = 0.2 C= 0.20 PER C.O.C. WEIGHTED COEFFICIENT OF RUNOFF T.O.C. = 20 MINUTES i ORIGINAL PROPOSED CONDITIONS RECEIVED TOTAL DRAINAGE AREA= 47,215 SF = 1.08 ACRES IMP. AREA= 38,789 SF = 0.89 ACRES JAN 112006 POND AREA= 0 SF = 0.00 ACRES PERV. AREA= 8,426 SF = 0.19 ACRES PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER CN CALCULATIONS TOTAL DRAINAGE AREA= 47,215 SF IMP. AREA= 38,789 SF OF IMP. AREA @ CN = 98 POND.AREA= 0 SF OF POND AREA @ CN = 100 PERV. AREA= 8,426 SF OF PERV. AREA @ CN = 49 (LAWN IN FAIR CONDITION, HYDROLOGIC GROUP A) CN = 89.26 C CALCULATIONS TOTAL DRAINAGE AREA= 47,215 SF IMP. AREA= 38,789 SF OF IMP. AREA @ C = 0.9 POND AREA= 0 SF OF POND AREA @ C = 1 PERV. AREA= 8,426 SF OF PERV. AREA @ C = 0.2 C = 0.78 T.O.C. = 20 MINUTES 0 PROJECT NAME: PROJECT NO.: Playa Del Sol 1 534 POND'S STAGE STORAGE DATA T.O.V. EL.= D.H.W. EL.= W.Q. EL.= BOTTOM EL. STAGE ft -NGVD AREA SF AREA AC STORAGE CF 5.90 2,800 0.064 6,720 5.70 2,800 0.064 69160 5.25 2,800 0.064 4,900 5.00 2,800 0.064 4,200 4.21 2,800 0.064 1,988 3.60 2,800 0.064 280 3.50 2,800 0.064 . 0 TOTAL WATER QUALITY CALCULATIONS: DRAINAGE AREA = REQUIRED WATER QUALITY DEPTH = REQUIRED WATER QUALITY VOLUME _ PROPOSED OUTFALL ELEVATION = AVAILABLE WATER QUALITY = ORIGINAL RECEIVED JAN 112006, PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER 47,215 SF 0.50 IN 1,967 CF 4.21 FT 1,988 CF NORTHSIDE ENGINEERING SERVICES POND DRAWDOWN ANALYSIS PROJECT: Playa Del Sol I PROJECT NO.: 534 VOLUME PROVIDED = 1,988 C.F. BOTTOM OF SLOT ELEV. = 4.21 BOTTOM OF POND ELEV. = 150 UNDERDRAIN INVERT ELEV. = 2.75 COEFFICIENT OF PERMEABILITY (K) = 0.09 FT /MIN LENGTH OF UNDERDRAIN = 40 FT SIZE OF UNDERDRAIN = 6 INCH 0 POND AREA (SF) = 2,800 S.F. POND AREA (SF) = 2,800 S.F. ELEV. AVG. HEAD INCR HEAD L (AVG) HYD. GRAD. FILTER ARE FLOW POND AREA INCR VOL. INCR TIME FT FT FT FT FT /FT S.F. CFM S.F. C.F. MIN. 4.21 2,800 1.12 0.18 2.75 0.41 63 2.30 497 216 4.03 2,800 0.94 0.18 2.75 0.34 63 1.94 497 256 3.86 2,800 0.77 0.18 2.75 0.28 63 1.57 497 316 3.68 2,800 0.59 0.18 2.75 0.21 63 1.21 497 411 3.50 2,800 TOTAL DRAWDOWN VOLUME _ TOTAL DRAWDOWN TIME _ 1,988 C.F. 20.0 HOURS �4 ORIGINAL RECEIVED JAN 112006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER NORTHSIDE ENGINEERING SERVICES 25 YEAR STORM EVENT PROJECT: ' Playa Del Sol I PROJECT NO. 534 RUN -OFF COEFFICIENTS PRE - CONSTRUCTION TOTAL DRAINAGE AREA= 47,215 SF 1.08 AC IMP. AREA= 28,334 SF OF IMP. AREA @ C = POND AREA= 0 SF OF POND AREA @ C = PERV. AREA= 18,881 SF OF PERV. AREA @ C = C= 0.20 PER C.O.C. WEIGHTED COEFFICIENT OF RUNOFF POST - CONSTRUCTION TOTAL DRAINAGE AREA= IMP. AREA= POND AREA= PERV.AREA= C= 0.78 STORAGE CALCULATION PRE - CONSTRUCTION DRAINAGE AREA = TIME OF CONC. Tc = I @ Tc =20 (25 YEAR EVENT)= Q(out)= CXIXA= POST - CONSTRUCTION 47,215 SF 1.08 AC 38,789 SF OF IMP. AREA @ C = 0 SF OF POND AREA @ C = 8,426 SF OF PERV. AREA @ C = 1.08 AC 20 MIN 6.40 IN /HR 1.39 CFS TIME MIN. I IN /HR ) Q(in) (CFS) INFLOW (CF OUTFLOW CF STORAGE CF 15.00 7.40 6.22 5,595 1,249 4,346 30.00 5.30 4.45 8,015 2,497 5,517 45.00 4.30 3.61 9,754 3,746 6,008 60.00 3.65 3.07 11,039 4,995 6,044 75.00 3.20 2.69 12,098 6,243 5,854 90.00 2.80 2.35 12,703 7,492 5,211 105.00 2.60 2.18 13,761 8,741 5,020 120.00 2.35 1.97 14,215 9,989 4,225 MAX. STORAGE = 6,044 TOTAL VOLUME REQUIRED = MAX. STORAGE REQUIRED = TOTAL VOLUME PROVIDED = MAX. STORAGE PROVIDED = WEIR DESIGN DHW EL. 5.70 FT CENTER OF ORIFICE ELEN 4.50 FT H = 1.20 FT Q = 1.39 CFS R= (Q/3.88 *H ^.5) ^.E 0.57 FT WATER QUALITY DEPTH = 0.5 in. WATER QUALITY = TOTAL POST CONST. AREA* DEPTH* 1ft/12in= TOTAL VOLUME REQUIRED = MAX. STORAGE + 3 /4in. WATER QUALITY = 6,044 CF 6,160 CF 14.4 6.85600488 1,967 CF 6,044 CF 0.9 1 0.2 0.9 1 0.2 ORIGINAL RECEIVED JAN 112006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER 06/14/2005 14:34 172745 ? OFFICAL RECORDS • PAGE 02/14 � «y A8 CDWVIY FLA. i ;' X4.50 INeT 0 90- 004731 - t- FTG X185- 34813SP , *s* OFFICIAL kECOFRIPS Ur SOOK.7173 _ PAGr 1096 -*- F� NT AgRFeE .� THIS EASE)MNT AGREEMENT (this "Agreement ") is made and entered. ow ""Tito 'this 11th' day* of January, 1990, by and between E & q iAS JMASTASOPOULOUS and-- GREGORr -- C:-- POL-11"S antee "). - y WHE1tE, S, Grantor is se fixed iA fee simple and in Possession of w 4 :the real property designated in Exhibit "A" attached hereto And :incorporated herein by reference "Parcel 1, as 8 and Grantee in - •':FHB' kR--1snd� it.' ;designated in the attached Exhibit "A- as• °paxcal A "r. and t • W WAS, the building constructed on' Parcel. A (the "Parcel A :Bul,lding^) encroaches onto Parcel 8, in an area'whosp approximate .10cation Is described on Exhibit "e" attached her @ta and w incorporated herein (the "Encroachment EaMement•Area "), sg depicted on .,4the plat of survey- prepared by Cornerstone Engineering rA ., Su�ivt�Yi1n4, Inc last dated -, 1Iovemliar 27, 1.9,89, and bearing project No. 88. 445; and .-`-- WHtREAS; Grantor has agreed that in conslderation of the sum Of TEN.-AND NO4sADL.=L14.LRS ($10.00) and- - other -•good -and •val�aabl.e ; -� consideration iron Grantee and all ,other persons claiming by,, through or under Grantee, their successors and assigns, Grantor shall grant a perpetual, exclusive easement for the c©ntinued exietence and maintenance of the Parcel A Suilding encroaching into + the JEncreachmant Easement Area for the benefit of and appurtenant to PlOcel A, NOW, TNLRSPORE, for and in consideration of TEN AND 00/100 0 4 DOLLARS (51000) and other good and val"able cons•idaration; •the _ An' d suff,iciOncy._of_ -which are bereby. acknowledged, Gza »tor hereby grant's and confirms unto•'Grantee, their successors and assigns, and all persons claim'intl by, through or under,Gtrantee, Q �. , for the benefit of Parcel'-A, • rn a peizeanent exclusive easement over, y under anti across the encroachment Sameent Area for the coOtlnued existence, maintenance and repair of the portion-of the ParCel'*A . Building which is presently located in the Encroachment Ea6emPnt Area, j TO HAVE AND TO HOLD, 'this Easement unto Grantee,' their = successors and assigns, ard all persons cldim }ng "by, through or under Grantee, forever. The benefits and burdens of this Easement shall inure to and —be- -big. •upon- the-•-s+ ncessors and -arnd Cron tee, and the terms, cgv nts • and conditiona - hereof shall:. be ]1stitlLte,�GOUeaaat��r ,ursine-- 'r.rl.+�}+_T„rbarrcrt a s.,,�..,,�,��» y�,��_.�y�is _ — _-Fas,ement- shall be appurtenant. to _,and io_r the _ -,beAe£it -of Parcel A. ,... Grantee, for itself, their successors and Assigns, by _.. acceptance o£'this grant of easement, hereby agries that-they-will Indemnify and hold Grantpr harmless of.and - from any and all claims; for damages, costs or expenses including reasonable attorneys r -and lecial, assisceht_s fees_,. which ��y • be i�r rred,rb��attt�_as . a - -...._ .._ _._.... result bf the use of Grantee and their•successors, assigns„ -ibis instrument prepared by' o Should -be raturim"as rr R, chard H. Solleer, Esq., Txenam, S3.mmons, 1KeM%er, —'- - Ftf'rsCbA ri3te d'/�r1Aw�i►rii Scharf, Bark in r 2700 Burnett Plaza " SLPB!@fSbtuy,r.r 371 Poat Office Box 1102, Tampa, Florida 33601 KARLL EN F , DFRI- ANF'R, Cl F'RK JAN. 1 i L u-i car Q CD 0 r a GuuF w 0 0�: z Z t CL 06/14/2005 14:34 172745 1 OFFICAL RECORDS PAGE 03/14 * *t OFFICIAL RC60ftm-sft� C.. -- -- -- BQEiK 7173 PAGE 19+7 - invitees and.licennees of the easement granted herein. • I1 5 WHEREOF, Grantor and Graotoo havgjcau60d this Agream nt� o be dxecuted and delivered as of the dal and juar first y above- written, Signed, •sealed and delivered in the presence oft GRP,XTORr '1 ,7 ' E & G INVESTORS, INC , S'" :•; a Florida corporation' BY$ A k ,..�.., . - _ - - -- -- - •- -1,S- ti�..- •.•fir �-� ' __� O to Grantor. GRANTEE t CD cr- • ELI ,RNASAS0' 5. ILI .,, to E. Ana u oa •� Q a to G. pbiitis _ STAVE OF FLORIDA Q COUNTY Of HILLSB6R66GH THE FOREGOING INSTAUMENT was acknowledged before NO this- •I., ! D day of January, 1990, by ELIAS ANASTASOPOULOS and GREGO1lY',C „•;'•' �.-✓ POLITTS . 2. ? ' ► - -' CD Natwpublic, Sta Florida at Large ' • I ' �” My Commission Expires: _. 'STATE OF flORIDA OF HILLSBOROUGH. - .- --..^..,_�.., .- •- - , a �M - _ - • —• . -- . .. �„ THE FOREGOING XNSTRiJFiENT acknovIedgad before me this //� ..._.__... .,day Of January, 1990, by EL POULOS *%d 049GORY-ILLT of B &`G INVESTORS, INC., a Florida 26rporaMn, on behalf of the _ N ary Public, Sta Zf Florida at barge - _� My. Commission Expireat 2, �. 06/;14/2005 14:34 172745 OFFICAL RECORDS PAGE 04/14 Xtx CWP) ., FAME liari►g , ' EXHIBIT law' R11RCiZ.' Jt 3 - SOBDIVXSION MIO., 5, ACCORDING'TO Ex,il THERS0* AS RUCORDIRD IN PLAT OWE 39, PAGES 38 MW 39 6P THE PUBLIC RECORD$ - OF .P- l"SLLAS Cdum! FLORIDA. ' 1 _ • _ R'lueCtti s x � y �_ �L/O�/T�}S�y� 9 AND ZQ, BLOCK 'Bo RAYS/I�DD2 STJBDZVISIpN�/!No. 5,• ."• !1.n�j ,r:.1 P 1 iRTL �/ n{' rl C.=. 77�ZG E[ 7)<:'- _�'S "- �SV�4MaRf+R{�"'�'"'ICGR /T = -" 'AND 39 O1� 7'F!8 PUBLIC R COxtDS Or PINBI.LA.�i COUNTY, -: N FALORIDI� Ql ' ' �u , F • _ r , s -(} - ue�.i.i4 CD — R.,.... -- .. ... _- •--- . -r-... �.�� .,.,.....ice - ,.,,..,.., i, .....,. .. -, • •�- - •_ CD .�_— ^.- '' -^^^_L •' - . ^- , Try __ -. - _. - I -�� ._— ___..�•.... , ._, -, , ._ —.:. .-. 4L 06/,14/2005 14:34 172745 OFFICAL RECORDS PAGE 05/14 • E *t•OPPICIAL AE01 l9(l(W "_7173 ' "PAM ' E�RA.,P�A N�N • ,• r� mm SG1M 5 1►EET OF THE 1ZST 35 FEET OF MM 10 AND ' THE - SOUTH 5 PUT 0? THE _Sl1 T 40 PEET OF LOT 9, BLOCK B, - SAYSIDE- SUBol hSi0N N0. 5, ACCORDING. TO FLAT THERM AS RECORDED IN FLAT BOOK 38, PAGES 38 AND.39 OF THE PUBLIC a RBCORDS'OP PXNLLLAS COUNW, PLORIM L9 g� L0 � r ... -�� • .- N �' Q� uuj Lam. - � ....... « �.r.- '.1! c`..i .- DOC VAriF5 _ - TOTAL, CHECK ri IT. Itilo RED; cti CHAN&, #tl.OU ' I CD CD - 4 4. 06/,14/2005 14:34 1727451 OFFICAL RECORDS• PAGE 06/14 ' .862Z.948 '5. aF,nw ?_.0 KARLEEN K AS BL.AAEP " ,.LUK OF CIRCU:1 CdURi• •. ` "IriELLAS :CLIVY. FL ° 99 5EP 16 PH 5; 16 , �. �..., `YASEM NY�CRBEM£� � n -- • • .. Easement made this gQth day of Jn �, L988, between i ELIAS,ANASTOUPOULOS and GREGORY POLITI4 doing business an the Elias Aaaatoupeulos and Cre opt Po11ti_# Partnership; (hereinafter referred to cr as "Grantor ") and WAI,CAEEN Co., an Illinois oorporation (hereinafter referred to as "Grantee "), as folloya: WHEAEAS, Grantor is the ovttar of a tract of land legally described' on_2xhibit PA" attached hereto and made a part haraof and herainsEter - LC? referred to as "Parcel One "; and WHEREAS, Grantor is also tbi owner of a tract of land legally j' a described i.n.Uhibit "B" attached hereto and made a part hereof, hereinafter raferr4O as'" Parcel Two", WAMEAS, Craftor ha la*aad; eel Two'co Crantee under„ chat 'dated 'L� - - -•� -- I certain.lesse 1988, and whereas Crantor wishes to grant to Cronta nd Granted wishes to receive an easement over, under, across and upon Parcel 0na for the foilovir+q ueeaeand. purpooes. TMEMWpE. ia•Consideration 4f' the premise$, Ten Dollaxa' (ilo.oc) and oChRr good,and valuable'conexdaration inclu ng.'but not li its exeCution by GrAtae of chit cattail leaopdatcd tov'ch* 5r-IL, by tt As Tenant- with respect to Parcel Wo, ^� ' Grantor *nt to Grantak the folloioing emteutnt* and makea-she M low ing..B,Rreemegta. cayeniinca and reat:'i`cLions: , Crant4r grs•nts to Cr,setes, stir suaceasors and assigns and �/j CrA.*tee'a t2nanta, aubtanancs, iiedneaae pnd: invitees -aa A�RA6�men.t______. - - -� -• appurtenant 60 'Parcel'.Two; an esaemant for ingress and egreaa of CD vehicular and ptdotrian'traffic over, acr000 and upon Parcel Onp and to and From all stteeCs and road* note er horeg„f,Car abutting Parcel One, Grantee is hereby granted tHa'rYaht, pc' its optfbn,a 0 install ii, e•t ah,Parcel Old, paved p4rking s1+d Other facitl40 ipcluding, but n O _ limipfwg'to, arivewiye, Curb cuts; curs* diradrtional sign*', draing',' '• landachping•,- dllumination equipment and such other Ucilitles'as Grantee . �,__ daerus itppropriats in lonneeEion therewith, Grantsaa,,�� i stall' -sty, all "c °f{a Grsncee - a , ar jjvft "of tie £oregoinQt ac its option. In the wfn doo in a gb'aii�snaw: ^ "° aba11 installs any of such iaciXiciel, it j woridbanlike manner, in iccordahca with Gtantea`s plane, and Grantertrr-YFit:cRplan.• ;Istcju. spscificatio" tbarafor and in accordance with In' the event -Grantee installs such impcavemants, Grantees - maink4A; repair and replace the saige,• as necessary, at CxaaCaes's ctfEm =:, fir° '��� C..uG pn4 expense until such time ae: estcel One is developed with buiiditiga v other structure's, At such Uvile-as anY such buildings or oche! otructures are installed '(whether -the same -or not dii accually occupied), Grantor aha'll eciamence and thereafter ConC2nua to -m necessary of the and -foci Zlea o a repair and replace as all improvssrlents on Parcel One in good order and condition °sad at Grantor '.9 so-ie 'doilt. and Grantor shall, at Grantor's 'expense, make all repents tb aY4 =° to all improvements becoming necessary as a result• of the �. repiatementr Or cC aa'sruct�cn, au I�nga or -other atructures onercr if � q,e•� a f° �4 One, 6uring' the period that Grantee maintains said improvements. Grartiree in�immpify, And hold Grantor' harmless from and against aAy C; r-, O shall A (This Instrument Prepared by A. H. Aesnicid► 200 Wilmot Road Darrfield• °v D,'... .,r, Ccua!/ ' .. • .... _ 06/,14/2605 14:34 5 OFFICAL RECORDS 18 PAGE 07/14 •17274 • 21438L r x835er (152.1 lops, coat or expense arising out of a claim for bodily injury or property damage occurring an the driveways, parklma aqd other faciliclea A. ° Iii'iiialled by'Grantee. The foregoing indemnity shall cease an - of the date that Grantor coemteneem any conatructton dp Parcel One. - In no 'event' oha11"dny" of said curb cuts, • driveways or curbs' bA' closed. Said curb out, driveway and paved ar'sas may be relocated - Lj : • provided that it shxll'at_p2.1'tines remain mouth of any buildings upon r I ' Parcel one and shall All$w direct access to and from Gulf View Boulevard South. There shalt be no curbs, barriers or other obstxuaciona - p separating Parcel One from Paicol Two during rho term of this asaemant, O odr ahall-aity cemporaty or permanent structure be fnatailad or parmipcad t� N over any,aueh;parking areas or- driveways which would, preclude or impede the £rse flew of traffic between Parcels One and Two and the str*ets Tom.= tri abutting the same. aw 2, Grantee hereby'grante to Grantor, its successors, assigns', tenants, subtenants, licensee: and invitees an esihment over and upon' the paved parking,areag from tia14 to time located On Ps Ma� Tva for ' vahicular'nnd pedeattXan ingreas.and egresa.ftom and to Parcel One. 3• Grantor grants to Grantee, it aucceasots,•aas wg , tenants, t� aubtenantp„ licensees end invitees as 'an easemenE app urtenant to.Part'el —� Twb;•a non - exclusive 4asem4t for vehlculai'parking on the parking edCeae•', 40 on Par* One.' Grantee grants to Grantor, it auccessars, assigns. tehancs, subtenants, libensee4 and invitoea, as an easement appurtenant to ' Parcel ono, a hon•excluaivm eseemantYor vehicuiar.ptrking over the 'parking areas', !i the same ara•conatItut,ad 'fro% time to.time, on Parcel Two. , Grantee •rraerves the right. at any time Upon notice td Grd'ntor, to " terminate the parkin; easement over and upon••Pareal 'two.,, In such event,.- M -fife parking tiaemint gYante�d .t0 Grarrtea 4,0ar end upon d'arcel One, is aforedese'sibed shall be, likewise terminated. In the event of any such termination. +no other eanas<ant, right or restriction granted by this, Eimement Agreemant shall be affected. 4. if any portion of the drivawsys'and,eu'rb cuts upon Parcel One is domag.d or destroyed by cesimaltys'after Parcel One is davelopad.by Graneor%'GrVto>; ahall prmeptly and at itl'°own expense, rentore.,repair ¢. or r #bu.11d the damaged os destroyed portions of Parcai One to a condition of goad order jand relsei.x so the the easements -granted herein sAy be fully utilised. S. In 6he •event that any porfton of Parcel Ong ahalZ be -taken - ` pursuant -to the A�rarciae p£ eminent domain'6r in the avant of a deed for a portion of damsel One in given in lieu or in fte course of aminnat domain proceedings.' the rt*Ainhg portion, Parcel, One shall be -" (^ bf restored by Grantor in i4tb "ever W as Gri enable Grantee the fullei&_ possible enjoyn4mt of,the within eaaementa. P6., Cxantor, hereby codemanca shat during abe coctinuagce of•thia ~ Easement Agreement, no porttiom.,of Parcel One ahall be'used for the ` ;aparacion of e.preacripcian pharmacy, drug atdre; petablishment engaged „ prltari in cha sale of haolth and beauty,•sids,..nar an establishment engaged the sale of aleoholiebeverasea fcx'off�prpmiseB gopsuaptiop. , t,� Irt iha event that hither party or their resepcCiva eucceambr4 add a4ai$ns,'vi.olate, attempts to violate, Or threatens to violate any of tea easements, restxictions'or covanante-contaibad harein, Grantee may, ° in addition to the recovery of such damages as much party hem, incurred, onforee this Easement Agreftedt by initiating proceedings for injunctive- • and. gquitable relief. The parties acknowledge chat in the evat►t any such violation or attempted or threatened violation, the racovery of damages shall he inadequate to fully coepenaate the non - breaching party or prevent.fuiure damage and that, in such event, the non - breaching party shall be'entitled to such i%junctAv■ an4,,equitab].e relief, -2- x? +• W 4t 06414/2005 14:34 r— . 1. a 172745 1 ,.. OFFICAL RECO_RDS� PAGE 08/1.4 @, This Easement Agretaent and the rights hereby created shall be superior to all leasea, convayances, transfers, assignments, contracts. arartge;es, deeds - of.trust end -other thV06raneat and dncuionEA In 'any way affecting any part of Portal one. Any person or'entley foreclosing +,any—such sortgage.•dced of trust, fien.or ancurErance and'any person or entity declaring title at pnaaeasion to Any portion of parcel One shall. Acquirer%nd hold such title or poasenaion iapreaoiy aubjaoc ca.tho piovisions.of this Eaaaaua't A4yaemeut, Any transfer of any interest in ° °. any part of Parcel one shall-xutaratically be deewe4. by acceptance of _ _ such interest, to agree co be bound by all tie truus of this Easemagt � � V 1 {� V? to be done and performed hereunder. 9. if any cars, caveaant or condition of this Uasment Agreement t try. Or tba application, thereof to -any parson or^ circumstance shall be ' ' ' .'. invalid or vnenforceabla.,xhe remainder of this E+aamont Aeraamant•or C [; ' CN the application of euch'carrs, covenant or condition to persona or t t" - -+`+ circubatat,caa other than thoae to which it is held invalid or unenforceable shall not be affected thereby and each other taros. ' ' W WUu� covenant, And condition shall be valid. and ■nforpaabla to the fullidt extent parmitted by law. L Lry� �. 10. No sodifieaeion, A%endment or termination of this Easement = z z Agrsemant shall be'delmed valid," or enforceable unless the aamo is in '� Z Z written form arld'consented to bys- (Frange, or its successors and ' ! 1 AV'— r under its leas# W th respaet to Parce 11. Each agrssmant, covenant, prOViee.•uadertaking, condition, aaaaiadt,,'right, pri'ilogp and restrietlou Contained herein shell Us,. . deemed ,+ covenant running wfth the land and shall riaain in fu onto and 'if -fact during the taim of ,the aforedikr� ibad leasedated —I.-- %J - , 1988, by ,dad batweih Grant6r ai Landlord 'And 'drahfAe AS The eas'satenta granted herein are also appurienant,to any land that may hWtifftr come to cosmos ownerahtp with Parcels one and /or -- — *scea.;3Wro.- — r F 1drantor'har'6y warrants• thi:t it has good and got ai*ple tlas , .to Parcel One. - Ral GLWOR EZ w AAA To1lPOmos , 0. •�•, �� f yam•, •, •' v �- �10EeatY ;''• '' CkEGM PAT T a + IP ' �' • ".•, Wica 'ass::. J - � � ',:, � e .1{ e toupoulcs axtd Po i_tis� r NOV eJ CD C) 06/14/2005 14:34 172745M1 OFFICAL RECORDSAlbk PAGE 09/14 STATE of ILLINOIS ) COUNTY. 00 1AKE Z hereby certify Char on this day before me, an officer duly .� authorized in the otats aforesaid and in t a county sfora std to lake ae wl ementd; personally appiared and �to re -known o ■ the persona escriibed .na wh xecVts.d_C6 *Gba foregathg instrument es Vice Presidani and - Assiatent soretary, respactivily4,of W94REEN Co., an Illinois ebrpaYaciony and severally aeknowledgad before me that they execuced, the gage as such offictWla the name'of and on behalf of said corporation. Witness my hatod apd offit i seal in the couacy snd,ataia.IAst aiorasai,d this day of (STi,AL) Notary Public liy.'Cow.ission Expires- STATE' r 1 •"1 '` � • SSA �' '. •?" Comm OF VotU5r,) n .► 4 ",; ' I hereby ce'tlfj that oo this day before 114 40 officer duly • _ auchpuizelf in thi stet: aforesaid end $q.tha countMefofasald to inks, 140- C. i ilclmowledgisenta; personally appeered *nIA'S AN"tOUPOULOS tnd CRE404Y 5 ;, r �, loLItIS, t ws known to, be ttfa perabna deaeribsi$ in�And who executed the �� 9� foregoing instrument as partners, respectively, of ELIAS MAT T¢UPOULOS ►� _0 + AND_CR=Ry, p0.1,ITI$ pARTNWjap, and ;sdvsrally ackoo`4edgad Wde 'ne' c' ° Ln '� that thijr es:ecutad the ass ,as, part's ■rs'to chr ;.name of '.Ap on behalf of ti' C� � C� said paituarstiip. "• . r P �—'- SV Lu VirnesR my hand and oEficl ea .dn the county and seat; last. ULJ c� aEore�eid this day of ►•!��• _ LU r (SEAL) s / — •�Cg zu ^ }(gar salon Upirsat CL — r ate Air sQ4 firres' L,_ +ch 17. IM" - '? U "0 v . ` ' .6 CD 06/,14/2005 14:34 172745 ' 1 OFFICAL RECORDS PAGE 10/14 SKETCH OF OtWRIPTION— r NoRr•N ' Gl1LF My BE, tap NolarK CPUrr) . d�ONIFyI -��• �•97�'ig'35" L AX9 y. ti a N- = cu V ff �•r =oitoo �•oaa:si• ,�rraoa a.or• :�.aa" ' Fig �' d ° , " /ss ��� •N�TIfs's�•�✓ '� c• /sg49�' ea�7/'�d''w c� L • - J • 4 &4�-c WAY LILvd !.*sav -k r.A�.Qt'jl. a s • C"r i CL BEAiiII GS ARE BASED -ON ,kCORD' PLAT '• SEE' SHEET•- x AND 3 Of 3 +K T POR DESCRIPTION THIS IS VT A SURVEY • ' • Tt� CALLS 'ON THIS PLAT Attt; FROM TtlE HEST *W-4)A AY10M AYAILAt AT sHi5 Ttf1E. AT THE CLI&TS REOLKa- MO CORNERS WE 8 L SET' (.�LWSUL AAi�+ a 11EWTHGMI ASSUWES No gESeQ!!$ 6EMMO, ACCEPTED 'MATHEMATICAL CLOSU µ,A OF -ARIOW AMA DISTANCES SHOWPI Ate 201 s• R% r' Ar•nW OII FIgt16� 9Qt1R17 11061 ¢96.131 i fills tCCT TO '1+IELa WRIMATION pRERAIkD FOR: WALGREFE CO, +� bATE,: T • 1 89 DFJAW(N 8T : Nl)g 7 f �4 x• iYti �� f.G REVISED.' doa N° adbd4.10 SCALE: Iwo 500 SHEET I CA � NQ 4?5a—I)AT 9 - OG/-.14/2005 14:34 1727451 OFFICAL RECORDS PAGE 11/14 .7- 0 Kerc" 4 &XR1010 - aRi;8359G 525 PARCEL A nGUK-'U- OF - *or ,*tt Lon ... _AAySIDR SUBDIVISJOJN NO. 5 AS -IT IS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK,;$, PAGES 38 AND 39 OF THE PUUTC R ECOROS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, F.LORIFA BEING MORE -PARTIPLARLY .--DESCR;BEO AS•FOLLOWS.: OEM AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER'OF SAID LOT40; THENCE RUN N 160 52,,42' E SAID L07,7 A DISTANCE OF 230.72 FEET ALONG THE WEST LINE Of SAID LOT 20 AND TO A POINT ON SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF BAYWAY EMULEVXRD NORTH (GULF NORTH ON PLAT),; SAID POINT BEING A P01,NT ON CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHERLY WRY BOULEVARD N AR 2--n -r v_.— TIM--OF S__l HAVING A RAMU"F-402T."W.'FEET; RUN EASTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF 5610 CURVE AND SAID-SOUnERLY RIGO-OF 7WAY LINE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 010 47' 39" A DISTANCE OF 150.93 FEET;, THENCE DEPARTING SAIIJ CURVE. RUN S 180 22' 31" W A DISTANCE OF 249.99'FEET 'TO A POINT ON THE NORTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF GULF VIEW BOULEVARD SOUTH (GULF WAY 8OLUVARD SOUTH ON PLAT); SAID POINT BEING A POINT ON A CURVE CONCAVE NORTHERLY HAVING A RADIUS OF 2640.00 FEET: THENCk RUN NORTHWESTERLY ALONG fKf 'ARC OF SAID CURVEAD SAID NORTHERLY RIGHT -OF -WAY LINE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE Of 030•08' 610 A OISTMCE OF 145.03 FEET . TO TH.E PONT OF CONTAINING 0.02 ACRES kbRF DR LESS, 'THIS DESCRIPTION WA$'BAtED-ON'A SURVEY BY GEORGE F."YpUNG, P.L.S. CD r CD 2t. Ar N ID Lf-2 CI! cf) SEE' SHF-ET I OF ;$ $K OH : A .. ., �: �LOIt^�VP�lA�• 6/>•W/R•�r !NG .. - rA4 EN VEERS PREPAMCD tO WAI�_GRE DATE MAYM BY Joe o8q64.10 SQAL£ NIA, SHEET 2 6r. s : �-a ZLLi Uik 2`l 0a. ., L 06/14/2005 14:34 172745 1 OFFICAL RECORDS - SkETCH. OF' D4SCRIPTION -, OR - i 8.3 5 PG O 5 � 6 " PARCEL 0 LOTS 16, 17'AMD A PORTION OF�OT 18, BLOCK• "Q'" OF BAYSIDE SUBDIVISION N0. 5 „ IlS rt ,: RECORDER 1N P� 800K Ie; PA E �6 AND 3 s •to �iJa rd, f9COR05 OF v -- P1NfLLI15 COUNTY, FLORIDA BEING MORE_ PARMCULARLY OESCRISED A5 QLLOWS; BEGIN AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT 16; THENCE RUN S 204 37' 52" W., ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID-QT 16 A DISTANCE OF 127.00 FEET TO A POINT ON PAGE 12/14 MR r.. THE NORTHERLY RIGHT -OF -NAY LINE'0F'r2ULF VIEW,BOULEVARD SOUTH (GULF WAY BOULEVARD 50M ON PLAT); SAID POINT BEING A POINT ON A CURVE CONCAVE NORTHERLY ; HAVING A RADIUS OF 2640.00 FEET; THENCE FROM A CHORD BEARING OF N )10 O1' 04" i1 „ RUN NORTHWESTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE AND SAID NORTHERLY RIGHT -OF- ;�._ri11Y_ LANE T�IKLaMI A_ TM1 .,AN,GLE_Of 03p -2-1 �9" FOR A DISTANCE OF THENCE DEPARTING SAID'CURVE RUN N 180 22' 31" E•A DISTANCE' OF .,FEET;- 128.40 FEET;TO., HE: MIRTH LINE OF SAID LOT 18; THENCE S 700 29' 56" E ALONG THE N0RTHZINk4QF•SAID LOT I8 AND SAID LOTS 16 AND�17 A DISTANCE OF- 159.99 ' FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGIN LNG. , ` CONTAINING 0:464 ACRES- MORE.OR LESS, THIS OESCRI'PT160 WAS BASED ON A,SURVEY BY GURGE F. YOUNG, P.L.S. - PROJECT BS- 13'0655 -00. _ p C='i - f__? =(i 0- ` +; - - w . SEE SHEET I OF $ FOR SKETCH = ir' cYWSt Mlb cim ENyyRWAtENZA4 ENiMDWS, LAM tows " •. .Y-xo� s. Rw�wir �w.nw Q�+�o, Flala, a2eva Y�aIBOa• �t PREPARED FOR: r WALGRE N CO. , J DATE : 7 . 1- 6 DRAWN BW 1y J - .� 11ES�iSED: _jail N4_�00064.10" $CASE: N/A SKEET 3 'OF 5 06/14/2005 14:34 172745AME1 OFFICAL RECORD PAGE 13/14 - $823 13 ORr,339�1 �i31 GRAM OF EASEMNT fMlt 1 +� THIS dRANT••OF EASWMKT made the day and year below written witnesseth that, twtrte•- -� - — - , — +� WEREAS, E S G INC.; a Florida corporation, hereinafter _ �- refereed to as "Grantor" , is the •owner" 6f —L2ae 1anc� c�� scribed -HC -�--�- below idcat,ed in Pinellas Cxwnty, Florida; and - WHEREAS, ELIAS 4MASTAg�OULOS and GRYGORY POLITIS, IV hereinafter referred. to as "Grantee ", are the 'Owners of parcels adjoining the land of Grantor and dcq�res an easement Cox- parking; WM, ,THEREFORE, Grantor in consideration of the sum T of s•10.00 and other valuable considerations does by this .instrument, give and grant tu° Grantees, thukr" h-e-txs and assigns, a permanent casement for tiarking over, across and upon the land 4escribed as.follows. ro� a f • O N C �x+m. 0 N �b ca a 1- Fog a Point of Beginning, commebce at the northwesterly corner of Lot 9, Block S, BAYSIpE SUBDI'VISSION NO. 5, as recorded in Plat Book 38. Pages 38 and 39 of the Public Records of pinallas.County, Florida. Said northwesterly Corner also being a point on th•e southerly Right -Of -Way Line of Gulf Way -6oulevdrd North (Ba)rway Boulevard);, thence along the said southerly Right -Of -WAY Line with a curve to the right, having d radius of 4820.00', a central angle of X00 °17149.9 ", an arc dxstanoe, of 25.00', a 'chord of 25.00' and a chord ,bearing of $71'27'37.0"&; therrclk departing card southerly Right -Of -way Line along a lime paratiel with and 25.00" from the westerly lot line of said Lot 9, Sl$ °2231.0'i4, 96,65'; thence along a line parallel with and 25.00' from-the southerly boundary of said Lot 9 and adjoining Lot x0 of the above %lock B, 570629156.0E, 90,.02' thence S1$'22'31.0 "W4 25.00' -to a point on the southerly boundary of said Lot l0;" thence along -the'aoutherlY boundaries of Lots 10 end 9', N70 °29'56.0 "W,, 115.02' to the southwesterly COr[feX 6f -said- 9 thence with the' wost'erly lot line of r. Jlc�M r 5 oa A.p t said Lot 9; N18,°22'31.0 0B, 121.16�h1 N►"�f'd7! poi" of Beginning. This easemennt• is granted with the - express condittaft, that Grantor shall have no Responsibility for O• ' maintaining the property that 'presently existb, nor'any O*"Wt1 liability or responsibility tb Grantee, their heirs or assigns, or to those who may use the property-. This conveyanoe is on the condition that if Grant %o oeastYs to use the easement for parking purposes, title to tbeL- easement shall revert to and vest in Grantor }rnmediat¢ly and automatift1ly. This easement is for the use of Grantee, their #heirs and assigns, and by irfvitees of and persons doing. business with Grantee, their heirs and assigns: T)ii9 r instrument rtadl9$8 d executed on this ,•�� day' of r - witnesses a o Grantor 4 P E 6 0 INC. a Florida corporation Bye .J� :✓. /< rr -+c.� Its Ftegxdent, sso.� CD (.J C63 o •r tL.lU i L1JU t sso.� CD (.J 06/14/2005 14:34 172745 OFFICAL RECORDS PAGE 14/14 -- -J•'•- "— STAVE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF PINELLAS BEFORE ME this day personally appeared F•(" Uq President of t & G, INC., a Floridn ' corporation, known to me to be the person described in and . who executed the foregoing instrument as President of E & C,, INC,,.fox' the purposes described therein. SWORN to before me on this _(�. day of J 7, s 1588': a'o t r NOtatry PubliO 'a +'•� ;' G°% -D t, My Commission ex�irA' CD M 7 , ti .. 412 E. Madison Street, Suite 111 FES _ TOTAL' $101871.00 Tampa, FL 33602 P/C AMT,T D: $101$71.00 813 - 226 -3138 REV -- C $.00 File Number: 03 -009A TOTAL l Will Call No.: r r BY DEPUTY CLUX -' (space Above This Line For Recording Data] Warranty; Deed This Warranty Deed made this 10th day of February; 2003 !between RATN, Inc., a Florida corporation whose post affice address is , grantor, and. Cotel, Inc., a Florida corporation ,whose post office address is 5649 49th Street North , St. Petersburg, FL 33709, grantee: (Whenever used herein the terms "grantor" and "grantee" include all the parties, to this instrument and the heirs, legal representatives, and assigns of individuals, and the successors and assigns of corporations, trusts and trustees) i Witnesseth, that said grantor, for and in consideration of the sum of TEN AND NO /100 DOLLARS ($10.00) and other good and valuable considerations to said grantor in hand paid by said grantee, the receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, has granted, bargained, and sold to the said grantee, and grantee's heirs and assigns forever, the following described land, situate, lying and being in Pinellas County, Florida to -wit: Lot 12, 13 & 14, Block B, Barbour- Morrow Subdivision, according to the map or plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 23, Page(s) 45, Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida Parcel Identification Number: Folio:08- 29 -15- 02592- 002 -0120 j SUBJECT TO a First Mortgage in favor of First National Bank, recorded in O.R. Book 11462, Page 2150, of the Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida, securing the original principal sum of $999,000.00, and which has a present principal. balance of $ 969,359.09, which mortgage Grantee herein expressly assumes and agrees to pay. Subject to taxes for 2003 and subsequent years; covenants, conditions, restrictions, easements, reservations and limitations of record, if any. Together with all the tenements, hereditaments and appurtenances thereto belonging or in anywise appertaining. To Have and to Hold, the same in fee simple forever. And the grantor hereby covenants with said grantee that the grantor is lawfully seized of said land in fee simple; that the grantor has good right and lawful authority to sell and convey said land; that the grantor hereby fully wan-ants the title to said land and will defend the same against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever; and that said land is free of all encumbrances, except taxes accruing subsequent to December 311 2002. In Witness Whereof, grantor has hereunto set grantor's hand and seal the day and year first above written. Signed, sealed and delivered in our presence: RATN, Inc., a Fl rida ation By: Witness Name: / eA Q Haris tel ident , <o;o AUGG 2 0 2005 1 Witn shame: "",-^- --• Svcc f. IIIII{ 11111 illll 11111 IIIII lun uni um uu list WES � ----------- - - - - -- __.....-- ____ -- -._ ___ -- -.. C4012771 03-04 -V, 3 13:34:07 EDZ 51 DED -RATN INC /COTEL INC ACCT x MOO CK AMT I #:03085443 DK:12574 SF'G:0964 EF'G:0967 e aced by- and return o: tephen Daniel Hayman, Esq. �� (� [� I I I 0 \ i v RECORDING �4 PAGES 1 $1`x.50 DOC STAMP' - DR,19 � $101850.00 pl?219 Attorney at Law Ds 13 $1.50 Rhoton &Hayman, P.A. ,NT 412 E. Madison Street, Suite 111 FES _ TOTAL' $101871.00 Tampa, FL 33602 P/C AMT,T D: $101$71.00 813 - 226 -3138 REV -- C $.00 File Number: 03 -009A TOTAL l Will Call No.: r r BY DEPUTY CLUX -' (space Above This Line For Recording Data] Warranty; Deed This Warranty Deed made this 10th day of February; 2003 !between RATN, Inc., a Florida corporation whose post affice address is , grantor, and. Cotel, Inc., a Florida corporation ,whose post office address is 5649 49th Street North , St. Petersburg, FL 33709, grantee: (Whenever used herein the terms "grantor" and "grantee" include all the parties, to this instrument and the heirs, legal representatives, and assigns of individuals, and the successors and assigns of corporations, trusts and trustees) i Witnesseth, that said grantor, for and in consideration of the sum of TEN AND NO /100 DOLLARS ($10.00) and other good and valuable considerations to said grantor in hand paid by said grantee, the receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, has granted, bargained, and sold to the said grantee, and grantee's heirs and assigns forever, the following described land, situate, lying and being in Pinellas County, Florida to -wit: Lot 12, 13 & 14, Block B, Barbour- Morrow Subdivision, according to the map or plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 23, Page(s) 45, Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida Parcel Identification Number: Folio:08- 29 -15- 02592- 002 -0120 j SUBJECT TO a First Mortgage in favor of First National Bank, recorded in O.R. Book 11462, Page 2150, of the Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida, securing the original principal sum of $999,000.00, and which has a present principal. balance of $ 969,359.09, which mortgage Grantee herein expressly assumes and agrees to pay. Subject to taxes for 2003 and subsequent years; covenants, conditions, restrictions, easements, reservations and limitations of record, if any. Together with all the tenements, hereditaments and appurtenances thereto belonging or in anywise appertaining. To Have and to Hold, the same in fee simple forever. And the grantor hereby covenants with said grantee that the grantor is lawfully seized of said land in fee simple; that the grantor has good right and lawful authority to sell and convey said land; that the grantor hereby fully wan-ants the title to said land and will defend the same against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever; and that said land is free of all encumbrances, except taxes accruing subsequent to December 311 2002. In Witness Whereof, grantor has hereunto set grantor's hand and seal the day and year first above written. Signed, sealed and delivered in our presence: RATN, Inc., a Fl rida ation By: Witness Name: / eA Q Haris tel ident , <o;o AUGG 2 0 2005 1 Witn shame: "",-^- --• Svcc f. PINELLAS COUNTY FLA, OFF . REC . BK 12574 PG 965 Y ' State of FlorA _County of _JJl Y2 -� ��RS The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 10th day of February, 2003 by Harish, J. Patel, President of RAIN,. Inc., a Florida corporation, on behalf of the corporation. He /0 is personally known to me or� [X] has produced a driver's license as identification. / [Notary Seal] otary blic �y +� Roberta W Comber r l y�MY Commission D0185102 Printed Name( �i„ Expires December 29, 2008 My Commission Expires:a 9�6 iv i Irepared by /rclum lo: Nickolas C. Fkononlidcs P:konomide,s & Associales, P.A. Sout111rust Plaza 201 E. Kennedy Blvd., Suite 1130 Tampa, Florida 33602 r • CROSS PARKING EASEMENT 0R9GIAL D U C� ocroszo�� PLAN Cif t'Y 't FNI CJC$ THIS CROSS GRANT OF EASEMENT made the day and year below written is between Elias Anastasopoulos and Gregory Politis on the one hand ( "First Party ") and SKTEL, Inc. on the other ( "Second. Party "). WHEREAS, First Party owns the land described as Lots 7,.8, 16, 17, 19. 10 and 20 in Block B of Bayside Subdivision No. 5, according to the map or plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 38, pages 38 and 39 Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida ( "Parcel A "), and WHEREAS, Second Party owns the land described as Lots 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 a►ul 15 in Block B of Bayside Subdivision No. 5, according to the map or plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 38, pages 38 and 39 Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida ( "Parcel B "); and WHEREAS each party wishes to grant the other access to two parking spots on their respective parcels on a non- exclusive basis. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of $99.00 and other good and valuable consideration the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the First Party and the Second Party do hereby agree as follows: The First Party does hereby grant to the Second Party a non - exclusive easement over and across Parcel A only for access to and use of the two adjacent parking spots located on lot 16 of Parcel A and being adjacent to the east property line and adjacent and parallel to the south property line of said Parcel A. The Second Party does hereby grant to the First Party a non- exclusive casement over and across Parcel B only for access to and use of the two adjacent parking spots located on lot 9 of Parcel B and being in the parking area of building "D" as labeled on that certain survey certified on February 29, 2000, and being adjacent to the south property line and adjacent and parallel to the west property line said Parcel A. This cross - parking easement is granted with the express condition that neither party shall have the responsibility for maintaining the parking spots for which this easement applies. nor have any liability or responsibility to the other party, their succcsst rs wid assigns, except for loss and dzunage caused by such party or its agents, invitees or successors an assigns and provided further that each party shall indemnify, defend and hold harmless the other from and against any damages, liability actions, claims, and expenses in connection with the loss of life, personal injury m , or daage to property arising from or in connection with the use of the other party's said parking spots. This cross parking easement is for the use of both parties, their heirs or assigns, and by invitees of and persons doing business with each respective part,/. rarcei B only for access to and use of the two�adjacent Part), arlcina ►ion- exclusive casement over and and being in the parking area of building • " " parking spots located on lot 9 of Parcel B 2000, and being adjacent to the south prop rtyclinc and adjac intcandir Survey l c.c,ttilicd on l;cbcuary 2�), said Parcel A. p to tllc west property line This cross - parking easement is granted with the express condition that neither art the responsibility for maintaining parking spats for which this casement applies. liability or responsibility to the other a party shall have party, their success' rs and assigns, except for loss and dam�c caused de such party or its agents, invitees or successors an assigns and provided further that shall indemnify, defend and hold harmless the other from and against any ided further liability claims, and expenses in connection with the loss of life, personal in'u each party actions, from or in connection with the use of the other party's said parkiiig oiia inj ry' or damage to property arising This cross parking easement is for the use of both parties, their heirs or assi n *of and persons doing business with each g s, and b invitees party. Y itc,cs This instrument is made and executed on this -day of 2000 Witnesses as to First Party First Party • A - - ►Vr / CIQ ca 0 Prepared by /return to: Nickolas C. Ekonomides Ekonomides & Associates, P.A. SouthTrust Plaza 201 E. Kennedy Blvd., Suite 1130 Tampa, Florida 33602 • 4 WARRANTY DEED URIUIN THIS WARRANTY DEED, Executed this % day of May 2000, by E & G Investors, Inc., whose address is 678 South Gulfview Boulevard, Clearwater, Florida 33767, as Grantor, and Elias Anastasopoulos, social security number r _ --,7 - 7afr? whose address is 1600 Gulf Boulevard, PH- I, Clearwater, Florida 33767, and Gregory Politis, social security number whose address is 965 Bayshore Boulevard, South, Safety Harbor, Florida 34695, together as Grantees. WITNESSETH, that Grantor, for and in . consideration of the sum of $10.00 in hand paid by Grantee, the receipt and sufficiency whereof is hereby acknowledged, have granted, bargained, transferred and sold unto Grantees an undivided half interest each in ;fee simple forever, all the right, title, interest, claim and demand which Grantor have in and to the following described lot, piece or parcel of land situate, lying and being in the County of Volusia,,,State of Florida, to wit: LOTS 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 AND 15 IN BLOCK B OF BAYSIDE SUBDIVISION NO. 5, ACCORDING TO MAP OR PLAT THEREOF AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 38, PAGES 38 AND 39 PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the same together with all and singular tenements, hereditaments and appurtenances thereunto belonging or in anywise appertaining, and all the privilege, right, title, interest, estate, lien, equity and claim whatsoever of Grantor, either in law or equity, to the only proper use, benefit and behoof of Grantee in fee simple forever. SUBJECT to taxes for 2000 and subsequent years„ and restrictions, easements and reservations of record. AND Grantor covenants with Grantee that, except as noted above, the grantor does fully warrant title to said land and will defend same against lawful claims of all persons whomsoever. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Grantor has signed and sealed these presents the day and year first above written. • Signed, Seal and Delivered in the presence of Witness �rte: a�ia� 111 Witness 1•*, Witness cy—) STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF HILLSBORO UGH • E & G Investors, Inc. OR 11, GINAL C�� � By: Elias Anastasopoulos Its: President E & G Investors, Inc. By:- (j'regory Pout's Its: Vice President In �o OCT 0 6 2005 PLANNiN 8.:�t-y::i <"VMFNT�UC; I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT BEFORE ME personally appeared Elias Anastaso potlf os; yas ' >� -_ = -t President of E & G Investors, Inc., IA personally known to be the person described in the conveyance, or who produced a valid number as identification and who, did take an oath and acknowledged the execution of this instrument to be his free act and deed for the uses as therein expressed. WITNESS my hand and official seal in the county and state last aforesaid this day of May, 2000. Patricia J. Ceelen �`Y�': ' „Commission # CC 902313 � 117 Expires Feb. 15, 2004 Bonded 0 ARY PUBL State of Florida vma Co,, Atlantic Bonding C Inc. , My Commission Expires: STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF HILLSBORO UGH I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT BEFORE ME personally appeared Gregory Politis, as Vice President of E & G Investors, Inc., who is personally known to be the person described in the conveyance, or who produced a valid number as identification and who, did take an oath and acknowledged the execution of this instrument to be his free act and deed for the uses as therein expressed. WITNESS my hand and official seal in the county and state ZStateofFlorida & day of May, 2000. 000J9 Patricia J. Ceelen 'd,�;_Commission # CC 902313 My Commission Expires: =? Expires Feb. 15, 3004 Bonded Thru: .,„�� Atlantic Bonding Co., Ina. r � FURTHER ASSURANCE AND COMPLIANCE AGREEMENT BUYER: SELLER: LENDER: BUSINESS: PURCHASE PRICE: CLOSING AGENT: BROKER: SKTEL, Inc. E & G Investors, Inc. E & G Investors, Inc. Clearwater Beach Resort $1,535,000.00 Nickolas C. Ekonomides Rudy Alstrom ; ORIGINAL For and in consideration of Ten Dollars ($10.00) and other good and valuable consideration, the funding of the purchase money loan from Lender to Borrower, if any, the closing of the aforesaid transaction and the Closing Agent disbursing proceeds of this sale, the undersigned do mutually agree to cooperate, adjust, initial, correct, execute, reexecute, reaffirm and redeliver any and all closing documents including but not limited to any notes, mortgages, deeds, affidavits and closing statements if deemed necessary and desirable in the reasonable discretion of Closing Agent in order to consummate the transactions described hereinbefore and in the Purchase and Sale Agreement relating thereto (the ";Purchase Agreement "). It is the intention of the undersigned that all documentation for this transaction and all payments or disbursements made will be an accurate reflection of the parties' agreements that each party should pay all costs and expenses contemplated by the Purchase Agreement or dictated by custom and usage in this area, and that Closing Agent shall be relieved of the burdens of Section 697.10 and Section 212. 10, Florida Statutes, by this Assurance. The undersigned agree and covenant to assure that this transaction and its documentation shall conform to the Purchase Agreement or Lender's requirements. Closing Agent is relying upon this Agreement and the covenants herein in closing this transaction. Further, the undersigned hereby acknowledge that Closing Agent prepared documents and closed this transaction in a neutral capacity and did not furnish any legal representation or counsel whatsoever to either party hereto. Closing Agent shall have the right, but shall not be obligated, to bring suit in his own name to enforce the obligations incurred by the parties in connection with the Purchase Agreement, and in the event any suit is brought to enforce this Agreement, the prevailing party shall be entitled to recover all costs and expenses including a reasonable attorney's fee. Furthermore, the parties hereby agree to hold Closing Agent and Broker, if any, free and harmless from any and all liability of any nature whatsoever associated with the herein transaction. 111111 OCT o 6 20,E PLANNING ± ')Cv�:I 0PtAFN i VCS I I I.f. - �,V;yaTFq — Signed, sealed, and delivered this 1 lth day of May, 2000. WITNESSES QRfGI "urn "SELLER" E & G Investors, Inc.. BY: Elias Anastasopoulos -- ITS: President "BUYER" SKTEL, INC. BY: Haris P ITS: Presiden • CLWCoverSheet r FLD2005 -07071 678 S GULFVIEW BLVD Date Received: 07/01/2005 PLAYA DEL SOL ZONING DISTRICT: T LAND USE: RFH ATLAS PAGE: 285A PLANNER OF RECORD: WW ORIGINAL RECEIVED JAN 112006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER .+.J0 SEC DS — TNT ---- FEES MTF - P/C REV 89CO6773 DECLARATION OF UNITY OF TITLE OR69I 4PG 1266 _ KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that pursuant to the Tojpi/O..�a ordinances of the City of Clearwater pertaining to the —1%9"' issuance of building permits and regulating land development activities, the undersigned, bring the fee owner(s) of the following described real property situated in the City, of Clearwater, County of Pinellas and State of Florida, to wits 0 cn .o v r- w v 0 va v c4 As H *PARCEL Is Lots 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 15, Block B, BAYSIDE SUBDIVISION NO. 5, according to the plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book Xo; 38, Pages 38 and 39, of tLe Public aca>: _ Records of Pinellas County, Florida. W ^y � oUO - Containing 1. 09 Acres MOL 140A07" GEM 01 -10-69 Wow z * *PARCEL Its Lots 7, 8, 16, 17, 18, " aAW-20, Block B, BAYSIDE SUBDIVRS111 LNQO. 5, 1 according to the plat thereof as c-an' a`n. recorded in Plat Book 38, Pages 38 TOTALY and 39, of the Public Records6 -af AT}T.TENDEREDT Pinellas County, Florida. GNANOE: Containing 1.23 Acres MOL *Parcel I is owned by E & G Investors, Inc., a Florida corporation, the principals of which are Gregory Politis and Elias Anastasopoulos. * *Parcel II is owned by Gregory Politis and Elias Anastasopoulos. do hereby make the following declaration of conditions, limitations and restrictions 'on said lands, hereafter to be known and referred to as a DECLARATION OF UNITY OF TITLE, as to the following particulars: 1. That the aforesaid plot or combination of separate lots, plots, parcels, acreage or portions thereof, shall 11s5?s0A � _ 31o.so s10.5d = f0.00 = hereafter be regarded as and is hereby declared to be unified under one title as an indivisible building site. 2. That the said d„pxoperty sba- ]..l hen.catorth—be -` considered as one plot of parcel of land under a site plan _ - Identified by the City of Clearwater as File Number PSP 88- _ 50, and that present owners rsaliae and that successor = developers and /or owners are hereby put on notice that Parcel = I is a timeshare project organized and existing under the = laws of the State of Florida, and that Parcel II is being = developed by present owners as a Walgveens Drug Store and = a retail strip shopping center; further, that the issuance = of building permits and regulated land development activities = of Parcel II have been predicated and conditioned upon the = fact that Parcel I and Parcel II are considered to be one _ plat or parcel of land, and that should successor developers = and /or owners wish to develop the property in any fashion = other than its present intended use as shown on the site = plan, that the parcel must be developed in a manner = consistent with the site plan. The contents of this = Declaration of Unity of Title are not intended to prohibit the sale of one parcel or another, but merely to give notice = that the uses for each parcel as identified on the site plan = cannot be changed, modified, or amended except in a manner = i� Description: Pinellas,FL Document -Book. Page 6914.1266 Page: I of 2 Order: 2187422 Comment: �. OR6914PC126 7 consistent with the site plan, which site plan may be amended subject to the approval of the City of Clearwater in accordance with its ordinances and procedures for site plan amendments. 3. That this Declaration of Unity of Title shall constitute a covenant to run with the land, as provided by law, and shall be binding upon the undersigned, and their heirs, successors and assigns of the undersigned, and all parties claiming under them until such time as the same may be released in writing under the order of the City Manager of the City of Clearwater. The undersigned also agree(s) that this instrument shall be recorded in the Public Records of `Pinellas County, Florida. S gned, sealed, witnessed an ack owledged this day of A11,1AlL 1969, at , Florida. v .- o - -- OWNER(S) 2 Parcel I Witnesssess n E & G INVESTORS, INC. By: GO IS Its VIce Preside -nit vile tic By: 6CAAi e A,.��GYs�o ELIAS ANASTASO OULOS- Its President Witnesses: STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF PINELLAS OWNER(S): Parcel II GREGORY POLITIS and ELIAS ANASTASOP ULOS By �i/".%f By 2 C—_ 611­ 14i&MQ& ELIAS ANASTASOPOUL BEFORE ME personally appeared GREGORY POLITIS and ELIAS ANASTASOPOULOS, to me known to be the persons described In a:,d who exacuted the foregoing instrument, and who acknowledged to me the execution thereof to be his or their free act and deed for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. WITNESS my hand and official seal this t� day of 1989. Description: Pinellas,FL Document -Book Order: 2187422 Comment: NOTARY PUBLIC ,• _ .,,,..;,ice: £9mmission Expires: A [IRV PUBLIC, STATE DI' FLORMA. iJDMM156I0N EXPIRES: AUG. 31, 11991. . a Jac .•wu MOYARY pusue UF.0KRWKIT=RR • ° I r. 1 < :�. •i i..i ;C; Page 6914.1266 Page: 2 of 2 eIG/14/2005 14:34 172745--- DFFICAL RECORDS ()Ie-X 4 '�*'AGE 02/14 F. 'COLWY FLA. bh 114ST 6 70-009731 FTG 189-346USP .*4t* OFFICIAL RECOFtfjS St* DOOK, 7173 p4C3r 1096 THIS RASEM• ACHUMENT (this "AgrGOMQW) In made and entered. is lltK 'day' of January, 1990, by And between E & Q A 111--i n atin !rzrAntcur_-_i n 4.Airj�NX.: of 'AS AMSTASOVOULOUS and --'%,%�Ior, 7 rv-myl antee"). POLMS (colrwu ILI 2 N 9 S-S 5-2 WHEItM# Grantor IS seized iA fee simple and in pqsseaslon of ?rte :the real Property designated In Rxhibit -A- attached hereto jind J :incorporat-ed herein by reference an "Parcel B", and Grantee is of t?M V_ :designated In the attatchqe"du Exhibit -(bit wA* as •paxcel A.;. and NNEREAS, the building constructed -on' Pa=Sf A (the -parcel :Building•) encroaches onto parcel D, in an ara�A'Whoqv approximate Location described on Exhibit •D. attached her9to and • :incorporated herein (-the -Encroachment saxemenLL-1 Area 4) , an depicted on the plat of survey, 'prepared by Corneisto► Znqine0rLftq a TffX-A-,W, Inc., last fisted November 27, 19.0,9,. and bearing proj L, No. 89­-45; and ec. MItREAgi Grantor'has agreed that In consideration of the sum of TEN.-An N04-wa-=1.i�1ti.S (810-00) and- ath r_qood -and • consideration from Grantee and All Other Persona claiming by,,• through or under Grantee, their successors and avoLqns, 'Grantor shall g rant a perpetual, exclusive easement for the continued • existence and maintenance of `the Parcel A Building encroaching into theFni:koachmqnt Easement Area for the benefit of and appurtenant to Pdxcel A; NOW, THERVrOPE, for and in ron6ideratlon of TEN AND 00/10() • COLLARS ($10j,00) and other good and valuable consideration; -the r6c0IM-ADA Guf 1iciQnqY-,of_whLqh are beiaby'acknow1odged, Grantor hereby, grantla and confirms unto Grantee, th9li Successors and assigns, and all persons claiminV by, through or under,Grrantee, for the benefit of Parlcer.A, a permanent exclusive easement ever, 4 pndex aro across the Encroachment Basement Area for the continued OxiitOnce, maintenance and repair of the portion•of th4 parcel•A Building which Is presently located in the encroachment Epsement. Area. b TO, HAVE AND To HOLD, 'this saeeimnt unto Grantee, their successors and a9vigns, aqA all pereons clAiming by, through or • under Grantee; forever. The beAefits and burdens of this Easement shall Inure to and —be.-b ladin -upga-4he-s"ces Sot,; and asa-19ndl-of era tor -1wid -*Gran toe; and the - terms, rQY"A" - and conditions -hereof Shall . be . A0.__':. SX It-12t.0 g-nlzemants. running * 10h parasol P-aXpa4-43--- -This co I A A - -F."emom"hall be appuitah'ani. to; end -.for it -of Parcel A. Grantee, for itself, their successors and assigns, by . . acceptance of, this grant of easement, hereby agrites that -they.will Indemnify and hold Grantor harmless of and -from any and all claims L for damages, costs or•expenoen including reasonable attorneys " -and J-0cial' assistants' f eee - whLch MMY ia"rre . - A- tksA_ result bf'ihe use of Grantee and their successors, agaigns., This Anstrvaent prepared by* and---should -be rwtnzi=&•tCr2 Richard H. Sollner, Esq.- rtmi IL-'- Tkenam, Simmons, Kemker, Scharf, B&Lkkqj_ Frye- r. FqCiXt —i"A dr 2700 Barnett plaza r.6 �Poat Office Box 1102, Tampa, Florida 33601 KARLEEN F., pFpj.AKF*Rj 13 VRK 05/14/2005 14:34 1727453 '1 OFFICAL RECORDS PAGE 03/14 **9 OFFICIAI. kECOtsI1S.. sfrR t.. 90O 7173 PMiS 18f►7 - j' invitees and•licenaees of the easement• granted herein.• ' ��t;SS- WHEREOF, Grantor and Grantee hevg4caubed this ' Rgre n o be dxecute4 and delivered as of the day and year first above-written, Signed, sealed and delivered .• {• in the presence oft GRJlMRt • _ . E & G INVESTORS, INC., a Florida cozparatisitt ►�� .�": :.' Dye A �,`•' to Grantor, _ A . GRANTEES —._. _ .. LIAS AMAS TASOPOUWS AWA to E. Am a os _ 1 GREWRY C&WP TIS to G. Pblitis - STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY Or HILLS80RO15GH _ - • �� .. THE FOREGOING INSx$UMENT was acknowledged before me'this- ,.. day of January, 1990, Ay ELIAS A27ASTASOPOUL05 And MGORV .C.. -,'% , ol . POf.I9'IS. - •' � � ' � N otf6 Public, Sta Florida at Large My Commission Expires: STALE OF - MORIDA •-t-- .CRSi11iTi OF }tILLSBpRpUGH• _..._ .......... .. ._ _ , zm _ - -• -. ,- .. � THE FOREGOING INSTRpltENT aCkno�+ladggd before me this ����,._•_• _ ,day of January, 1990, by ELL TASQPOULOS of it i`G INVESTORS, INC., a Florida rporatidn, on behalf of thtr N awry Public, Sts of Florida at barge - - My Commission Expires :. S'_ f:�j - - - - - o - 06./14/2005 14:34 172745 OFFICAL RECORDS PAGE 04/14 7173 PArlg 1 r 23MINIT 'RA- . FAR= As i ,�, - , • SV9DiVISIOlt N0. 5, ACCORDIli6'TO ALA'l �RgO!' !1S RECORDED -. . IN P 001C LAT a 39, PACES 38 AND 39 6F '1'!{S• PUBLIC RECORpg O! nP� tam COt11177, PIAAiD1►. LOTS. 9 AM 11D, BLOCK 'Bo DAXSIDE $t1BDIVIS.TPN HO. 5, ae-i - -- ikGf�3RBii} bA' P- TQi6i480!!- ,l�s^RECOlt9Blik-P6i�T- BOOIEn; — - PAGES 38 -MD 39 OP TIM PUBLIC R#COPMS OP PINgLLA$ COURTl, FLORIDA. t 66/14/2005 14:34 1727453 OFFICAL RECORDS PAGE 05/14 • t #t • Opp IC ?AL• MWORD8 Inli • f mo SODTH 5 FE&T OF THE WEST 35 FRET OP 1AM 10 AND•THR SOUTH s rxRT Or THE _WT 40 ]FORT OF LOT 9, sLOCK B, � BAYSID - sUBbIVT5I0N N0. 5, ACCORDING TO PT.AT THRREW AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 38, PAaQS 30 AND .39 OF THE PUBLIC a . ARCORDS'Or PINBLLAS COUNW, rWRIDA. s 5tC u1 -1l-9a 47:37:28 { DOC Was - Tu7PL: $ w —. 4, _ _ Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2008 7:30 AM To: Dougall- Sides, Leslie Cc: Delk, Michael; Clayton, Gina; Tefft, Robert Subject: 678 S. Gulfview Blvd. Gulfview S 678Gulfview S 678 avelopment Orc6taff Report.do.. Leslie - On February 21, 2006, the CDB approved Case No. FLD2005 -07071 to permit a mixed use on the subject property. As part of the application, the proposal included a "swap" of land with the adjacent property owner to eliminate an existing building encroachment of an adjacent commercial building onto the subject property, but also giving some of the adjacent commercial property to the subject property such that the "swap" of property was approximately equal. This was to be memorialized in a Minor Lot Adjustment approval by the City prior to the issuance of any permits for the mixed use project (Condition of Approval #3 in the attached Development Order; the Staff Report is also attached), which then would have required the recording of deeds to effect the "swap" of property. However, this Minor Lot Adjustment has not been yet submitted. The approvals under FLD2005 -07071 are set to expire on August 21, 2008 (no additional time extensions available). In preliminary discussions regarding the new proposal, I have indicated that a similar Minor Lot Adjustment should be included in the new proposal, so as to eliminate the building encroachment. Apparently, the adjacent property owner also owned the subject property in the past and decided to divide the property without regard to locations of existing improvements. Elimination of the building encroachment from the subject property will also eliminate the nonconformity that exists on the subject property, which would be the cleanest option available. If the building encroachment is to stay on the property, albeit within this easement, then the proposed use of the property will be a "mixed use" of commercial floor area in addition to the proposed overnight accommodation use. A mixed use calculation will need to be performed, which may affect the proposed density of the overnight accommodation use. The building encroachment cannot be excluded from the subject property (it is either intended to be on the subject property or be off through a Minor Lot Adjustment prior to issuance of any permits, but it cannot be "excluded "). The encroaching building does affect required setbacks when detailing the "request" for development approval. I don't know whether we would support a reduction to required setbacks for this encroaching, nonconforming building. I am unaware if the encroaching building affects title issues for the subject property. There are also parking and trash facilities for the adjacent commercial development on the subject property that affect site design. The encroachments and easements to address the encroachment issues are cumbersome when dealing with the redevelopment of the subject property. These are my thoughts on the issues. Wayne - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Dougall- Sides, Leslie Sent: Friday, August 08, 2008 2:40 PM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: FW: 678 S. Gulfview I'd be interested in knowing your thoughts on this... - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Jayne E. Sears [mailto:JayneS @jpfirm.com] Sent: Friday, August 08, 2008 1:44 PM To: Dougall- Sides, Leslie Cc: Wells, Wayne; Katie Cole Subject: 678 S. Gulfview I'm sending this email on behalf of Katie Cole. Katie will be calling you to discuss this matter and we wanted to provide you some background information. Katie and I have both previously discussed this with Wayne. Our client will be submitting an application for redevelopment of 678 S. Gulfview with a hotel (151 rooms proposed) and will be requesting 100 rooms from the newly established Hotel Density Reserve, so our application will include a development agreement. There is an encroachment of a neighboring building onto this site. It is depicted in the attached portion of the survey. There is a recorded easement agreement (attached) concerning the encroachment. on a previously approved development order (FLD2005- 07071) for redevelopment of 678 S. Gulfview, there was a condition of approval for a minor lot adjustment. Wayne Wells has preliminarily indicated that planning would again require the lot adjustment in connection with the redevelopment application. We are aware that the current owner spent substantial time in previously trying to terminate the easement in exchange for conveying the encroachment area and getting the neighbor's cooperation in accomplishing the lot adjustment but was unable to come to an agreement with the neighboring property owner. Further, the potential reduction in lot size may negatively impact the density available on the site. Due to these difficulties involved in attempting to terminate the encroachment easement and effectuate the lot adjustment, we would like to explore any other options, such as excluding the encroachment area from the site plan or including it and requesting relief from setbacks for the encroaching building. Katie will call you on Monday to discuss but wanted you to have the proper facts and background information. Jayne E. Sears Legal Assistant Johnson, Pope, Bokor, Ruppel & Burns, LLP 911 Chestnut Street Clearwater, FL 33756 Phone: (727) 461 -1818 Fax: (727) 462 -0365 2 ' �i ° Y xY J I,VIVI rCt I t ')IUtVVALr\ 0-1Q) rvnn � 6.41 . — — WPP6 � — — — WM 0 , INLET ao -- — -- `-`O 0 — GRASS — CONCRETE ° SWALE� sp `v SACK L 2 LINE 7.0' 29.9' PGS. 38 -39 "" - 62.2' o or 62.2' h/ � N r s �3° CI ..5.. 5.4' 5.4' 25.0., PARKING EASMENT �Fyl O.R.B. 6835, PGS. 1731 -1732 a 5" 1 (2) STORY C. 1.0 * , B.S. P CONCRETE LOT 11 b ASPHALT ADDRESS 678D PARKING LOT CONCRETE PARKING BLOCK B �h N PF "ARKIN� UNDER BUILDING 00 w 6$a GARAGE EL. -6.18 in'. 0 z - `' ` LOT 10 00 (2) STORY C.B.S. � 0 M i BLOCK B (6 ;7- ADDRESS *678C OT 8 0° rn n N �`JRIPLE) LOT 9 � CONCRETE PARKING 1` UNDER BUILDING OCK B ono m M -, ;o � 1 \ BLOCK B c� GARAGE EL.-6.72 Lnn�'�� z r 0 m z 0 *� ENCROACHMENT J EASEMENT 5.4' z N ?, `� a_ O.R.B. 7173, PGS. 1896 -1899 PLANTER 0Dn 0 4 2.4' -� 62.2' = PLANTER B.S. r. - iL cr TI C p�.�.69 c� G) ro• / ss C E rn �� WALE 8. ASPHALTRKIN 'EASEMEN 3 O.R. 6835 S.1731 -1 2 PARKJNG ^� rk SPILL AY 5.5' CQ CRETE I EWALK N7 ° 15'05 "11( &M) 69. 4'(C &M) 0.8 62.3' FN /D - N70 °X9'56 "WpP &M) 185.00'(P M) LB 3889 GRASS TBM No. 2 EL.-6.97 0.7' CONC.. ' WALL CONC. WALK / DRAINAGE EASEMENT 'O.R.B. 10971,-PAGES 398 -400 ASPHALT 0.8 CONC ONE DRAINAGE City of Clearwater Development &Neighborhood Services Building Department Meeting Loq NAME Please Pant Cornpany c , k De artrnent Contact: Phone or E -mail r� -•9 C-� 1.1 %� , C ✓ ) J r ill J) V, j 2 / (ti L U G b t � � � � r✓ !i' DA TE OF MEETING ROOM # TOPIC ITY OF C L E A R W A T E R POST OFFICE Box 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758 -4748 f MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562 -4567 FAX (727) 562 -4865 IT Lt [� 3 PLANNING DEPARTMENT May 16, 2007 Ms. Doreen Williams Northside Engineering Services, Inc. 601 Cleveland Street, Suite 930 Clearwater, FL 33755 RE: FLD2005 -07071 — 678 South Gulfview Boulevard Time Extension Development Order Dear Ms. Williams: On May 15, 2007, the Community Development Board (CDB) APPROVED your request to extend the time frame for the Development Order for the above referenced case. Pursuant to Section 4 -407, an application for a building permit to construct the site improvements on your parcel at 678 South Gulfview Boulevard shall be submitted by August 21, 2008. All required certificates of occupancy shall be obtained within two years of the date of issuance of the building permit. Time frames do not change with successive owners. Should you be unable to apply for a building permit to construct the improvements approved under the above referenced case, you will need to re -apply for development approval in accordance with the requirements of the Community Development Code. Please be aware that the issuance of this Development Order does not relieve you of the necessity to obtain any building permits or pay any impact fees that may be required. In order to facilitate the issuance of any permit or license affected by this approval, please bring a copy of this letter with you when applying for any permits or licenses that require this prior development approval. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Planner III at 727 -562 -4504. Since rel Michael Delk, AICP Planning Director S: IPlanning DepartmentlCD BIFLEX (FLD)Ilnactive or Finished Applications )Gulfview S 0678 Playa Del Sol (7) #1 Mixed Use - ApprovedIGulfview S 678 CDB Time Extension Development Order 5.16.07.doc FRANK HIBBARD, MAYOR JOHN DORAN, COUNCILMEMBER J.B. JOHNSON, COUNCILMEMBER BILL JONSON, COUNCILMEMBER CAREEN A. PETERSEN, COUNCILMEMBER "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER" '-Horths e CIVIL • n LAND PLANNING • Fct�urrev�ut y sm' • loco ENVIRONMENTAL • TRANSPORTATION • April 23, 2007 Community Development Board c/o Michael Delk Planning Director 100 S. Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, FL 33756 RE: Playa Del Sol — FLD2005 -07071 678 South Gulfview Blvd. Dear Mr.. Delk: We would like to formally request a one -year time extension to the Development Order for case FLD2005- 07071. Previously we requested a six month extension which was granted and this will be - expiring ion August 21, 2007. Due to the downfall of the condominium market, or real estate in general in Florida, it currently is not feasible to move forward with construction at this time. In addition, the architect is still tweaking his design for the interior spaces of the building. We want to assure:you.thatme are working diligently on this project and that it will be built to the architectural standards of the City of Clearwater and be a building everyone can be proud of The project consisting of 27 dwelling units, 4 overnight accommodations and 3,650 square feet of office has been approved with 88 parking spaces where only 63 were required. With the current code change, meeting the two spaces per unit, we still have an overage of 12 spaces for the site. While awaiting to submit for building permits, we have obtained a permit from SWFWMD. Upon the city's countersignature of the Florida Department of Environmental Protection, and Pinellas County Health Department applications, we will be submitting for water and wastewater permits. We appreciate you placing this agenda item on the next CDB hearing in regards to this extension. Thank you in advance for your cooperation; we awaiting hearing from you with a confirmed date of the hearing. Sincerely; reenA: ;Williams n' REC � P.roject Director.. 1 APR 2 6 2007 601 CLEVELAND STREET, SUITE'930 CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33755 PLANNING DEPARTMENT NESADMIN @MIND5PRIN6.00M CITVOFCLEARWARR N E S T E C H @M N D S P R I N6.COM 727 - 443 - 2869 FAX 727 - 446 • 8036 04/23/2007 15:56 7274468036 Nonns e April 23, 2007 Community Development Board c/o Michael Dells Planning Director 100 S. Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, FL 33756 RE: Playa Del Sol — FLD2005 -07071 678 South, Gulfview Blvd. Dear Mr. Delk: NORTHSIDE ENG SVGS • PAGE 02/02 CIVIL • LAND PLANNING 10 ENVIRONMENTAL 6 TRANSPORTATION 6 We would like to formally request a one -year time extension . to the Development Order for case FLD2005- 07071. Previously we requested a six month extension which was granted and this will be expiring on August 21, 2007. Due to the downfall of the condominium market, or real estate in general in Florida, it currently is not feasible to move forward with construction at this time. In addition, the architect is still tweaking his design for the interior spaces of the building. We want to assure you that we are working diligently on this project and that it will be built to the architectural standards of the City of Clearwater and be a building everyone can. be proud of The project consisting of 27 dwelling units, 4 overnight accommodations and 3,650 square feet of office has been approved with 88 parking spaces where only 63 were required. With the current code change, meeting the two spaces per unit, we still have an overage of 12 spaces for the site, While awaiting to submit for building permits, we_ have obtained a permit from SWFWM. D. Upon the city's countersignature of the Florida Department of Environmental Protection, and Pinellas County Health Department applications, we will, be submitting for water and wastewater permits. We appreciate you placing this agenda item on the next CDB hearing in regards to this extension. '!'hank you in advance for your cooperation; we awaiting hearing from you with a confirmed date of the hearing. Sincerely, reen A. Williams Project Director 001 CLEVFIANn STRFFT, SLIT !-F. 43c) CLEARWA7ER, F1.Q)RIDA 33755 NE5ADMINrTMINDSPRItlG.C..QM N E S T E C Ii«!-MIND5PRINC..C_0M 727 - 443 • 2869 FAX 727 • 446 • 8036 04/23/2007 15:56 7274468036 NORTHSIDE ENG SVCS PAGE 01102 Northside. LANDSCAPE•' • ENVIROWT. NT1t 1 TRf1NSPORWION + FACSIMILE TRANSMITTAL DATE: April 23, 2007 TIME: 3.55 pml PAGE 1 OF 2 TO: Mr. Michael Della FAX NO: 5624865 OF: Clearwater Planning Deptartment i FROM Angel H. Crisp, Executive Admit7istrativ6 Assistant PROJECT NAME: Playa. Del Sol / FLD2005- 07071. COMMENTS: Request for a titre extension to D.Q. J PLEASE DO NOT HESITATE TO CONTACT OUR OFFICE SHOULD YOU HAVE ANY FURTHER QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS REGARDING THIS PROJECT, i 601 CLEVEZAND STREET, SUITE 930 CLEARWATER, FLO.RJDA 33755 T (72 7) 443- 2$691F (72 7) 446 -5036 E— MAIL: A1DM N cz,NORT'ITSIDEENG.FNEERINC. COM I Horthside 54�� SMA&a Ito# April 3, 2007 Community Development Board c/o Michael Delk Planning Director 100 S. Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, FL 33756 RE: Playa Del Sol — FLD2005 -07072 678 South Gulfview Blvd. Dear Mr. Delk: YN, CIVIL • LAND PLANNING • ENVIRONMENTAL • TRANSPORTATION • We would like to formally request a one -year time extension to the Development Order for case FLD2005- 07071. Previously we requested a six month extension which was granted and this will be expiring on August 21, 2007. Due to the downfall of the condominium market, or real estate in general in Florida, it currently is not feasible to move forward with construction at this time. In addition, the architect is still tweaking his design for the interior spaces of the building. We want to assure you that we are working diligently on this project and that it will be built to the architectural standards of the City of Clearwater and be a building everyone can be proud of. We appreciate you placing this agenda item on the next CDB hearing in regards to this extension. Thank you in advance for your cooperation; we awaiting hearing from you with a confirmed date of the hearing. Sincerely, oreen A. Williams Project Director IT IJDI ' i. ` APR - 5 201,= =7 PLANNING R DEVELOPMENT SERVICES CITY OF CLEARWATER a u PLANNING DEPARTMENT POST OrPicr Box 4748 CLenRwArPR Fl.oalDA 33758 -4748 MUNICIPAL. St3RVIC1iSUll.i)ING, LOO SOUTH MYR'I'LI; AVINUIy CLFARWA "1'1iR, FLORIDA 33756 TL?LIiPHONY. (727) 562 -4567 FAx (727) 562 -4865 LONG RANGE PLANNING DEVELOPMHNT Rr:virw December 1, 2006 Ms. Doreen Williams Northside Engineering Services Inc. 601 Cleveland Street, Suite # 930 Clearwater, Florida 33755 RE: FLD2005 -07071 — 678 South Gulfview Boulevard Time Extension Development Order Dear Ms. Williams: On February 21, 2006, the Community Development Board (CDB) approved the above application for Flexible Development approval to permit a mixed use (3,650 square feet of office floor area, 27 attached dwellings and four overnight accommodation rooms /units) with reductions to the front (north along Bayway Blvd) setback from 15 feet to 9.6 feet (to building), from 15 feet to five feet (to existing pavement) and from 15 feet to zero feet (to trash staging area), reductions to the front (east along Parkway Drive) setback from 15 feet to 10.3 feet (to building) and from 15 feet to zero feet (to trash staging area), reductions to the side (west) setback from 10 feet to five feet (to pool and patio decks) and from 10 feet to zero feet (to existing pavement and sidewalk), reductions to the side (south) setback from 10 feet to 7.4 feet (to building), from 10 feet to zero feet (to trash staging area), and from 10 feet to zero feet (to existing sidewalk and pavement), a reduction to the side (east) setback from 10 feet to five feet (to pool deck) and an increase to building height from 35 feet to 85.08 feet (to roof deck) with an additional 5.67 feet for perimeter parapets (from roof deck), as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2- 803.C. Section 4-407 of the Community Development Code requires the application for a building permit within one year of the date the CDB approved the request (February 21, 2007). This same Section allows an extension of time to initiate a building permit, provided good cause is shown and documented in writing within the original period of validity. The Planning Director may also consider whether significant progress on the project is being made and whether or not there are pending or approved Code amendments that would significantly affect the project. On November 14, 2006, you submitted a request for a six -month time extension to apply for a building permit to construct the improvements on this parcel. Your letter cited issues of current work load of both the architect and engineer in order to submit a properly designed building and site, incorporating the minor revisions approved on June 14, 2006, and coordinated through a private reviewer to minimize comments upon submission of the plans for a building permit. Since the approval of this project, the Code has been amended in the following that affect this project: PRANK I IMBAIM, NIA) 01" JOIf"� 1)(m\'\' H T I kNI11.10N. C()I XCII,MI :MBER B1].i.Jo'\";oN, Ccn,NCai. nt nse; C.ARIA:N A. PHERSE:N. C0 I NC1L\1FNIBH,' "F(,mAL IINIPLO nIFNT AND nr•r•rr.MA' ivi•: Ac[ ON EMPLO) 1 :1," December 1, 2006 Williams — Page Two The requirement for parapet height for buildings with flat roofs has been amended to a maximum of 42- inches. This project was approved with a parapet height of 5.67 feet (from roof deck). In considering the above change to the Code, in accordance with the provisions of Section 4 -407 of the Community Development Code, I APPROVE a six -month time extension to August 21, 2007, to submit an application for a building permit to construct the site improvements on your parcel at 678 South Gulfview Boulevard. In the event you are unable to proceed with the project by submitting for the building permit, the CDB may approve one additional extension of time to initiate a building permit application. Such extension shall not exceed one year, shall be for the project originally approved (or as approved through the Minor Revision process) and shall be for good cause shown and documented in writing. The CDB must receive the request for this extension within the time frame granted by the Planning Director (period of validity after the original extension approved by the Planning Director, which means that any time extension request must be submitted with sufficient lead time to be placed on the CDB agenda that precedes the above expiration date). Good causes may include, but are not limited to, an unexpected national crisis (acts of war, significant downturn in the national economy, etc.), excessive weather - related delays, and the like. The CDB may also consider these same Code amendments enumerated above, whether significant progress on the project is being made and whether or not there are additional pending or approved Code amendments that would further significantly affect the project. Please be aware that the issuance of this Development Order does not relieve you of the necessity to obtain any building permits or pay any impact fees that may be required. In order to facilitate the issuance of any permit or license affected by this approval, please bring a copy of this letter with you when applying for any permits or licenses that require this prior development approval. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Planner III at 727 -562 -4504. Sincerely, Michael Delk, AICP Planning Director S: (Planning DepartmentlC D BIFLEX (FLD)Vnactive or Finished Applicationsl Gulfview S 0678 Playa Del Sol (T) #1. Mixed Use - ApprovedlGulfview S 678 Time Ext. Dev. Order 12.1.06.doc Horths e November 14, 2006 Mr. Wayne Wells Planner III City of Clearwater 100 S. Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, FL 33755 RE: FLD2005 -07071 678 South Gulfview Boulevard NES: 554 — Playa Del Sol Dear Mr. Wells CIVIL • LAND PLANNING • ENVIRONMENTAL • TRANSPORTATION • ORIGINAL RECEIVED NOV 212006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER On February 21, 2006, the Community Development Board approved the above case and ;a Development Order was issued. As stated in the Development Order, pursuant to Section 4 -407, an application must apply for a building permit by February 21, 2007. Although a little pre - mature, we would like to formally request a 6 month extension to the Development Order. With the minor modifications being made to the building (which have been approved) as well as the work load of the architect and engineer, we are unable to meet the February 21St deadline. We would like to be able to coordinate our efforts along with a private reviewer in order to minimize the building comments which will be generated upon building plan submittal. We look forward to your favorable response. Sincerely,. oreen A.-Williams Project Director 601 CLEVELAND STREET, SUITE 930 CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33755 N ESADMI N @MI N DSPRI N6.COM N ESTECH@MI N DS PRI N6.COM 727 • 443 - 2869 FAX 727 • 446 • 8036: 11/14/2006 11:42 727446 HUiFiliib,� be November 14, 2006 Mr. Wayne Wells Planner, III, City of Clearwater 100 S. Myrtle avenue Clearwater, FL 33755 RE: FLD2005- 07071 67$ South Gulfview Boulevard NES: 554 — Playa Del Sol Dear Mr. Wells' NORTHSIDE ENG PAGE 02/02 CIVIL • LAND PLANNING F'NVI RON MEN [AL TRANSPORTATION On February 21, 2006, the Community Development Board approved the above case and a Development Order was issued. As stated in the Development Orden, pursuant to Section 4-407, an application. must apply for a building permit by February 21, 2007; Although a little pre- mature, we would like to formally request a 6 rnorith extension to the Development Order. With the minor modifications being made to the building (which have been approved) as well as the work load of the architect and engineer, we are unable to meet the February 21' deadline. We would like to be able to coordinate our efforts along with a private reviewer in order to minimize the building comments which will be generated upon building plan submittal. We look forward to your favorable response Sincerely, preen A. Williams Project Director 601 CLEVELAND 5TRF_FT,,5UITF 9)0 CLCARWAI ER, FLORIDA 33755 NE5ADMIN(s,MINDSPRI NG.CC7M NE;STFCH «+lMINDSPRING.COM 727 • 443 - 2869 FAX 727'• 446 • 8036 i 11/14/2006 11:42 7274468 NORTHSIDE ENGS CIVIL Northside LANDSCAPE ncace� cur �, rlrc. ENT!TRONMENTAL TRANSPORTATION FACSIMILE TRANSMITTAL DATE: November 14, 2006 TIME: 11:55 pm PAGE 1 OF 2 TO: Mr. Wayne Wells FAX NO: 562 -486 OF: Clearwater PlanniTg FROM; Angel Haines, Executive Administrative A_ ssistant PROJECT NAME: Playa Del Sol — FLD2005 -0707 1, COMMENTS: D.Q. extension request. PAGE 01/02 �LE.ASE DO NOT HESITATE TO CONTACT OUR OFFICE SHOULD YOU HAVE ANY FURTHER QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS REGARDING THIS PROJECT, 601 CLEVELAND STREET SUITE 930 CLEAR WA TER, FLORIDA 33 755 T (72 7) 443- 28691F (72 7) 446 -8036 ,E -MAIL: ADMI1 @jVOR 2'HSIDEENGINEE.RING. C'OM V, ■ /' CITY OF C LEARWAT E R 'PLANNING DEPARTMENT Possr Orrua: Box 4748, CLI'J \K \Yh \'17iK Fi,ofm)A 33758 -4748 0 4` . MuNI(al>nl. SIiRVICliS I3un.nING, 1.00 So[,rll Mvtrru: Avr•.Nln•:, CIYARWnTKK, FL.OKIDA 33756 Trl.la'IIONB (727) 562 -4567 FAX (727) 562 -4865 LONG R\NG? PIANNING DEVI:I.OPMBNT Ri- 'ViiiW June 14, 2006 Ms. Doreen Williams Northside Engineering Services Inc. 601 Cleveland Street, Suite # 930 Clearwater, Florida 33755 Re: Development Order — Minor Revision FLD2005 -07071 — 678 South Gulfview Boulevard Dear Ms. Williams: On February 21, 2006, the Community Development Board (CDB) approved with 13 conditions the above referenced case, which was a request for Flexible Development approval to permit a mixed use (3,650 square feet of office floor area, 27 attached dwellings and four overnight accommodation rooms /units) with reductions to the front (north along Bayway Blvd) setback from 15 feet to 9.6 feet (to building), from 15 feet to five feet (to existing pavement) and from 15 feet to zero feet (to trash staging area), reductions to the front (east along Parkway Drive) setback from 15 feet to 10.3 feet (to building) and from 15 feet to zero feet (to trash staging area), reductions to the side (west) setback from 10 feet to five feet (to pool and patio decks) and from 10 feet to zero feet (to existing pavement and sidewalk), reductions to the side (south) setback from 10 feet to 7.4 feet (to building), from 10 feet to zero feet (to trash staging area), and from 10 feet to zero feet (to existing sidewalk and pavement), a reduction to the side (east) setback from 10 feet to five feet (to pool deck) and an increase to building height from 35 feet to 85.08 feet (to roof deck) with an additional 5.67 feet for perimeter parapets (from roof deck), as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2- 803.C. A proposal has been submitted to modify the approved plans by revising the dumpster area at the southwest corner of the building to provide sufficient area for the storage of dumpsters serving the retail and restaurant building to the south and to provide a passageway through the ground floor of the parking garage to access the trash staging area on Bayway Boulevard. Provision of the passageway through the ground floor of the parking garage reduces provided parking from 86 to 84 spaces, which still exceeds required parking (including the provision of two parking spaces per dwelling unit). In accordance with Section 4 -406.A of the Code, the revisions proposed are deemed to be a Minor Revision and is APPROVED. These Minor Revisions must be shown on the site plans and building plans when submitting to the Development Services Department for building permits, with the following additional changes from the plans submitted June 2, 2006, and approved under this Minor Revision: 1. Revise the Site Data table on Sheet C1.1 for provided parking (84 spaces) and for any associated changes to the impervious surface ratio and open space calculations due to the enlarged dumpster enclosure and sidewalks. 2. Revise Sheets C4.1 and L1.1 to show the changes approved under this Minor Revision. l a:\NK I I11MA I), :: \1:\v„!; )„!m DolK\N, (: ,rXCIIAIFMI ..I; I Im I I I:\VII.mN• ("OI MI _MENI rI" BIU, N( ii_\u w.r!; (; \!;i r;N A. I'i rertieN, ("()I I { \m! .M. \II..N I :\NU Arriioi:\ r!r!: Ac. r[c,,,\ F ;\m!.m hK" ��4 • June 14, 2006 Williams — Page 2 • 3. Revise Sheets C3.1, C4.1 and L1.1 to show sidewalks to access the east and west sides of the dumpster enclosure at the southwest corner of the building and a sidewalk from the north side of the building to the trash staging area. 4. Revise the architectural floor plan for the ground floor to reflect the passageway created through the parking garage. Should you have any questions, feel free to contact Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Planner III, at 727 -562 -4504. Sincerely, Michael DeKA , ICP Planning Director S: (Planning DepartmentlCD BIFLEX (FLD)IInactive or Finished ApplicationslGulfview S 0678 Playa Del Sol (7) #1 Mixed Use - ApprovedlGulfview S 678 Minor Revisions Letter 614.06doc -NorlhSide ! CIVIL • LAND PLANNING 0 ENVIRONMENT TRANSPORTATION N 0 • June 1, 2006 ORIGINAL Mr. Wayne Wells RECEIVED Planner III City of Clearwater Planning Department JUN 02 2006 100 S. Myrtle Avenue PLANNING DEPARTMENT Clearwater, FL 33756 CITY OFCLEARWATER RE: Playa Del Sol — 678 S. Gulfview Blvd. FLD2005 -07071 Dear Mr. Wells: Attached herewith please find a revised Civil Site Plan, Sheet C3.1, along with revised Architectural Elevations, Sheets A2.1, A2.2 and A2.3 showing a minor modification to the above redevelopment project. The above project has been approved through the CDB on February 21, 2006. Since then, we have been working with the previous owner of the site and current owner of the retail shops to the west of our parcel regarding lot line revisions, sidewalks and dumpsters. In keeping with everyone being happy we have agreed to retain the dumpster for the retail on our site. The current Clearwater Beach Hotel as it stands today provides a location on site for the dumpster which is used by the retail shops. We have agreed to open our building on the west side running north to south and locate the dumpster and enclosure on the south side of our building for roll -out purposes. Please review the enclosed site plan and architectural elevations showing placement of dumpster along with minor changes to the west side of the building. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call. We look forward to hearing favorably from you. Sincerely, oreen A. Williams Project Director Enc. 601 CLEVELAND STREET, SUITE 930 CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33755 NESADMIN @MINDSPRIN6.COM N ESTECH @MI N DSPRI N6.COM 727 • 443 • 2869 FAX 727 • 446 • 8036 Northsiiie CIVIL • + LAND PLANNING • 5 "l" s� /000 ENVIRONMENTAL• I --7_- TRANSPORTATION 0 LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL Date: June 1, 2006 To: Mr. Wayne Wells, Planner III Planning Department City of Clearwater 100 S. Myrtle Ave #210 Clearwater, FL 33755 Reference: Playa Del Sol NES Proj# 554 We Transmit: Enclosed Mail Pick -Up Per Your Request X For Your Use For Your Files Under Separate Cover UPS Overnight Hand Delivered For Your Review & Comment For Your Approval For Your Information Descripti ORIGINAL RECEIVED JUN 0 2 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT' CITY OF CLEARWATER X Originals X_ Prints Addendum Shop drawings Specifications Applications Floppy Disk 1 Letter 1 Sheet C3.1, Signed and Sealed 1 Set of Architectural Renderings Please contact us at (727) 443 -2869 should you have any questions or comments. By: 'Anje-1 H n'es, Executive Admin. Assistant Copies To: File N. Pelzer D. Williams 601 CLEVELAND STREET, SUITE 930 CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33755 NESADMIN @MINDSPRING.COM NESTECH@MINDSPRING.COM 727 • 443 • 2869 FAX 727 • 446 • 8036 N�� • LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL Date: May 17, 2006 To: Mr. Wayne Wells, Planner III Planning Department City of Clearwater 100 S. Myrtle Ave #210 Clearwater, FL 33755 Reference: Playa Del Sol/ FLD2005 -07071 NES Proj# 554 We Transmit: Enclosed Mail Pick -Up Per Your Request X For Your Use For Your Files Under Separate Cover UPS Overnight X Hand Delivered For Your Review & Comment For Your Approval For Your Information CIVIL• LAND PLANNING • ENVIRONMENTAL0 TRANSPORTATION • ORIGINAL RECEIVED MAY 18 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER X Originals Prints Addendum Shop drawings Specifications Applications Floppy Disk Please contact us at (727) 443 -2869 should you have any questions or comments. ByAeD n A. Williams, Project Director Copies To: File N. Pelzer 601 CLEVELAND STREET, SUITE 930 CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33755 NESADMIN @MINDSPRIN6.COM N ESTECH@MI N DSPRI N6.COM 727 • 443 • 2869 FAX 727 • 446 • 8036 Copies Description 1 Minor Modification Request Letter 1 Sheet C3.1 CIVIL• LAND PLANNING • ENVIRONMENTAL0 TRANSPORTATION • ORIGINAL RECEIVED MAY 18 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER X Originals Prints Addendum Shop drawings Specifications Applications Floppy Disk Please contact us at (727) 443 -2869 should you have any questions or comments. ByAeD n A. Williams, Project Director Copies To: File N. Pelzer 601 CLEVELAND STREET, SUITE 930 CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33755 NESADMIN @MINDSPRIN6.COM N ESTECH@MI N DSPRI N6.COM 727 • 443 • 2869 FAX 727 • 446 • 8036 Horthslide CIVIL• LAND PLANNING • C0 # Sewk& 1100f I ENVIRONMENTAL• (� w" 7-- _..7 TRANSPORTATION • May 17, 2006 Mr. Wayne Wells ANAL. Planner III RECENED City of Clearwater Planning Department 100 S. Myrtle Avenue MAY 18 2006 Clearwater, FL 33755 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER RE: Playa Del Sol FLD2005 -07071 Dear Mr. Wells: We would like to request a minor modification to the above approved plan. In conversations with the adjacent property owners, the following has been determined:. The dumpster for the retail center cannot be rolled out to the curb if cars are parked on the lot to the west. The proposal is to provide an opening through the building for easy access for roll -out. No parking spaces were lost. Please review the attached plans referencing the above plan changes. If you have any questions or need additional information, do not hesitate to call. Sincerely," Doreen A. Willi Project Director Cc: Troy Perdue Dr. Harish Patel File Enc. 601 CLEVELAND STREET, SUITE 930 CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33755 NESADMIN @MINDSPRINC.COM NESTECH@MINDSPRINC.COM 727 • 443 • 2869 FAX 727 • 446 • 8036 Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Wednesday, May 16, 2007 10:49 AM To: Doreen Williams (E -mail) Subject: FLD2005- 07071, 678 S. Gulfview Blvd. Doreen - Attached is the Development Order for the time extension for the above project. The original letter will be mailed. Wayne Ti 3ulfview S 678 CDB Time Extens... C] Wells, Wayne 1] From: Jayne E. Sears [JayneS @jpfirm.com] Sent: Wednesday, May 10, 2006 8:48 AM To: Wells, Wayne Cc: Troy J. Perdue Subject: RE: Minor Revision for Playa Del Sol, 678 S. Gulfview Blvd. Wayne, thank you for following up on this. It helps us to have this in writing for purposes of dealing with the adjacent owners. Troy, I will fax a copy to Dr. Patel. - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Wayne. Wells @myClearwater.com [ mailto :Wayne.Wells @myClearwater.com] Sent: Tuesday, May 09, 2006 5:48 PM To: doreen@northsideengineering.com Cc: Jayne E. Sears Subject: Minor Revision for Playa Del Sol, 678 S. Gulfview Blvd. Doreen - Attached is the Development Order for the recently submitted Minor Revision for the above referenced project. The original letter is being mailed. Wayne <<Gulfview S 678 Minor Revisions Letter 5.9.06.doc>> 1 . 41 - )f • 0 ` 'Y�v° fsTf11 LONG RANGE PLANNING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW C ITY OF C LEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT POST OFFICE BOX 4748, CLFARWATER, FLORIDA 33758 -4748 MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAx (727) 562 -4865 May 9, 2006 Ms. Doreen Williams Northside Engineering Services Inc. 601 Cleveland Street, Suite # 930 Clearwater, Florida 33755 Re: Development Order - Minor Revision FLD2005 -07071 - 678 South Gulfview Boulevard Dear Ms. Williams: On February 21, 2006, the Community Development Board (CDB) approved with 13 conditions the above referenced case, which was a request for Flexible Development approval to permit a mixed use (3,650 square feet of office floor area, 27 attached dwellings and four overnight accommodation rooms /units) with reductions to the front (north along Bayway Blvd) setback from 15 feet to 9.6 feet (to building), from 15 feet to five feet (to existing pavement) and from 15 feet to zero feet (to trash staging area), reductions to the front (east along Parkway Drive) setback from 15 feet to 10.3 feet (to building) and from 15 feet to zero feet (to trash staging area), reductions to the side (west) setback from 10 feet to five feet (to pool and patio decks) and from 10 feet to zero feet (to existing pavement and sidewalk), reductions to the side (south) setback from 10 feet to 7.4 feet (to building), from 10 feet to zero feet (to trash staging area), and from 10 feet to zero feet (to existing sidewalk and pavement), a reduction to the side (east) setback from 10 feet to five feet (to pool deck) and an increase to building height from 35 feet to 85.08 feet (to roof deck) with an additional 5.67 feet for perimeter parapets (from roof deck), as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2- 803.C. A proposal has been submitted to modify the approved plans with the following two items: Remove the existing /proposed landscape area between the proposed building and the existing parking for Walgreen's on the west side for the purpose of providing a sidewalk to roll out the additional dumpster being provided for Walgreen's on the subject property to the trash staging area approved on Bayway Boulevard. Response: Criteria #6 of Section 4- 406.A.6 states that a minor revision is one which: "Does not result in a substantial modification or the cancellation of any condition placed upon the application as originally approved." In the "Analysis" section on page 5 for Case FLD2005- 07071, the Staff Report stated "All areas of the site will be heavily planted, including the area around the existing overnight accommodation building fronting on South Gulfview Boulevard, which will provide a pleasing appearance for this entire project. The areas on the west side of the site around the existing parking area for Walgreen's must also be improved to the same standard as the new areas of the site, which should be shown on a revised landscape plan prior to the issuance of any permits." The approval of this case by the CDB included Condition #6, which states: "That, prior to the issuance of any permits, the landscape plan be revised to show the west PRANK HIBBARD, MAYOR 13111 JONSON, VICE -MAYOR JOHN DORAN, COUNCIL M1 ?M13ER HOl'1' HAMICLON, COUNCILMEMI3RR ® CARL6N A. Pl- FERSEN, COUNC.ILMI.M11FR "EQUAL. (EMPLOYMENT AND APFIRMATIVIi ACTION EMPLOYER" May 9, 2006 Williams — Page 2 side of the site improved to the same standard as the new areas of the site, acceptable to the Planning Department. The desired sidewalk would result in a substantial modification or cancellation of Condition #6 on the approval of FLD2005- 07071. In accordance with Section 4 -406.A of the Code, the revision proposed in Item #1 above is not deemed to be a minor revision and is DENIED. Should you desire to further pursue this sidewalk as desired, it would require an application to be submitted as an amendment to the originally approved project for review and decision by the CDB. Alternately, based on a site inspection and our discussion, it appears that this dumpster is not for Walgreen's but for the adjacent commercial uses to the west of the overnight accommodation use building. It is recommended that a dumpster enclosure for a rollout dumpster be constructed on the north side of the existing Walgreen's building where such would not interfere with this loading and dumpster area. This new dumpster could still be rolled to the proposed trash staging area shown on the approved plans. An additional alternative would be to rework the existing dumpster enclosure north of Walgreen's to accommodate an additional fixed dumpster within this enclosure, thereby eliminating the need for the trash staging area on the subject property. 2. Reconfigure the side lot line between the adjacent commercial development to the west and south to allow the proposed amended, common lot line to run straight in a line rather than having a jog in the lot line. This change reduces the lot area for the subject property from 47,215 to 46,985 square feet. In conjunction with the reduction of the parcel size, the proposal reduces the proposed nonresidential building square footage from the approved 3,650 to 3,400 square feet. Response: This portion of the proposal actually takes property away from the subject parcel. The reduction in the parcel size, coupled with the reduction of the nonresidential building square footage, maintains the approved 27 attached dwelling units and four overnight accommodation rooms /units (see attached mixed -use calculation). A Minor Lot Adjustment will still be necessary, in compliance with Condition #3: "That, prior to the issuance of any permits, a Minor Lot Adjustment be submitted to the Planning Department, approved and recorded in the public records." In accordance with Section 4 -406.A of the Code, the revision proposed in. Item #2 above is deemed to be a minor revision and is APPROVED. This minor revision must be shown on plans submitted to the Development Services Department for permitting purposes and on the Minor Lot Adjustment request to be filed with the Planning Department for approval. Should you have any questions, feel free to contact Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Planner III, at 727 -562 -4504. Sincerely, Michael elk, AICP Planning Director S.•IPlanning DepartmentlCD BIFLEX (FLD)IInactive or Finished ApplicationslGulfview S 0678 Playa Del Sol (7) W Mixed Use - ApprovedlGulfview S 678 Minor Revisions Letter 5.9.06.doc I 5/5/06 Mixed Use Calculation for Playa Del Sol Property — 678 South Gulfview Boulevard A. Property is zoned Tourist District (maximum FAR .= 1.0 .and maximum density = 30 du /acre) 1. Permitted FAR ............. ............................... ....................1.0 2. Multiply #A1 by bldg sq. ftg. of retail & restaurant proposed...........x 3,400 sf 3. Lot area required to support #A2 in the building .........................= 3,400 sf 4. Lot area ......................................... ............................... 46,985 sf 5. Subtract the lot area required to support non- residential use in the building ( #A3) ..... ............................... 3,400 sf 6. Lot area (sf) to calculate the maximum number of dwelling units ....= 43,585 sf 7. Divide #A6 ........ ............................ ............................... 43,585 sf 8. Land area in an acre .................... ..... ..............................— 43,560 sf 9. Lot acreage for residential portion ............ .............................. = 1.000 acres 10. Multiply #A9 .................................. ............................... 1.000 acres 11. Maximum density ............................. ..............................x 30 du/acre 12. Maximum number of dwelling units permitted ........................ — 30 du B. Maximum Development Potential for Property 1. Existing. Overnight Accommodation Rooms/Units (OVA) to remain... 4 rooms 2. Conversion of OVA in #B1to dwelling units (40/30 rule) ................ 3 du 3. Maximum number of dwelling units (# Al2 ) ............................. 30 du 4. Subtract converted OVA to remain ( #B2) from #B3 ........................3 du 5. Maximum # of dwelling units ............... ............................... = 27 du • Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Tuesday, May 09, 2006 5:48 PM To: Doreen Williams (E -mail) Cc: Jayne Sears (E -mail) Subject: Minor Revision for Playa Del Sol, 678 S. Gulfview Blvd. Doreen - Attached is the Development Order for the recently submitted Minor Revision for the above referenced project. The original letter is being mailed. Wayne Gulfview S 678 Minor Revisions... 1 i r� sqiw" smlim 9000 April 21, 2006 Mr. Wayne Wells Planner III City of Clearwater Planning Department 100 S. Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, FL 33755 RE: Playa Del Sol FLD2005 -07071 Dear Mr. Wells: We would like to request a minor modification to the above approved plan. CIVIL* LAND PLANNING ENVIRONMENTAL • TRANSPORTATION • In conversations with the adjacent property owners, the following has been determined:. 1. The dumpster cannot be rolled out to the curb if cars are parked on the lot to the west. We can roll it out between the wheel stops and the building if we can remove the (2) .:5" trees and either replace them elsewhere on the property or payment in lieu of replacement. 2. Another lot line adjustment from the original approved lot line adjustment following the lot line to the east to straighten out the property lines for future development of the property to the south. The lot area will change and it has been calculated that we can reduce our rental space to 3,400 square feet. The approved rental space was 3,650. This will give us a 250 s.f. reduction. Please review the attached plans referencing the two above plan changes. If you have any questions or need additional information, do not hesitate to call. Sincerely, � Doreen A. W Project Director Cc: Troy Perdue Dr. Harish Patel File Enc. 601 CLEVELAND STREET; SUITE 930 CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33755 NESADMIN @MINDSPRING.COM N ESTECH @MI N DSPRI NG..COM 727 443 2869 FAX 727 446 8036 ORIGINAL RECEIVED APR 21 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER ORIGINAL RECEIVED APR 21 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER DENSITY CACULATIONS: Proposed 41 - Permitted door Area Ratio (FAR): 1.0 x Area of nonresidential portion: 3,400 s.f. = lot size required to support non - residential use: 3,400 s.f. Total area of site: 46,985 s.f. less non - residential use of 3,400 s.f. = 43,585 s.f. = 1.0006 Ac. Less area required to support Overnight Accomodations (40 Units /Acre) = 4,365 s.f. = 39,220 s.f.= 0.9004Ac Allowable density: 30 u.p.a. x 0.9004 Ac = 21 units. NON - RESIDENTIAL AREA : 4,294 S.F, EXISTING MOTEL UNITS 4 NEW CONDOMINIUM UNITS : 21 10 R S '1 0 0 Page 1 of 1 Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Monday, April 10, 2006 10:15 AM To: 'Doreen Williams' Cc: Jayne Sears (E- mail); Stephen R. Fowler (E -mail) Subject: RE: Playa Del Sol Doreen - Based on the provisions of Section 4 -406, it would appear that such changes (reducing the land area and office floor area) would be a Minor Revision. However, you will need to submit such changes for a formal determination. It is unclear whether any setbacks are being reduced by the additional change(s) to the lot lines, which could be a major change requiring CDB review and approval. Wayne - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Doreen Williams [mailto: Doreen @northsideengineering.com] Sent: Monday, April 10, 2006 9:05 AM To: Wells, Wayne Cc: Jayne E. Sears Subject: FW: Playa Del Sol Wayne, we did a new calculation based on having to do another lot line adjustment to satisfy Louie. Based on the calculations, we would have to reduce the office space by 250 sf. Is this going to be a major modification that will send us back to CDB or can we do a minor modifications and work through staff? From: FOWLERARCH @aol.com [mailto:FOWLERARCH @aol.com] Sent: Monday, April 10, 2006 8:59 AM To: Doreen Williams Cc: WCN531 @aol.com Subject: Re: Playa Del Sol D, My calculations (see attached) figure that we need to reduce the office spaces from 3,650 s.f. to 3,400 s.f.. in order to keep the Overnight Accom. and the 27 Units. See if you agree... thanks. Steve Fowler 449 -2021 Internal Virus Database is out -of -date. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.375 / Virus Database: 268.1.2/274 - Release Date: 3/3/2006 Internal Virus Database is out -of -date. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.375 / Virus Database: 268.1.2/274 - Release Date: 3/3/2006 4/10/2006 , 1JA1 LONG RANGE PLANNING DEVELOPMENT RFVIFW Mr. Housh Ghovaee CITY.OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT POST OFFicF, BOX 4748, CI.EARWATER, FLORIDA 33758 -4748 MUMCIPAL SFRVICFS BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTI.E AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562 -4865 February 22, 2006 Northside Engineering Services Inc. 601 Cleveland Street, Suite # 930 Clearwater, Florida 33755 RE: Development Order - Case No. FLD2005 -07071 — 678 South Gulfview Boulevard Dear Mr. Ghovaee: This letter constitutes a Development Order pursuant to Section 4- 206.D.6 of the Community Development Code. On February 21, 2006, the Community Development Board reviewed your requests for Flexible Development approval to permit a mixed use (3,650 square feet of office floor area, 27 attached dwellings and four overnight accommodation rooms /units) with reductions to the front (north along Bayway Blvd) setback from 15 feet to 9.6 feet (to building), from 15 feet to five feet (to existing pavement) and from 15 feet to zero feet (to trash staging area), reductions to the front (east along Parkway Drive) setback from 15 feet to 10.3 feet (to building) and from 15 feet to zero feet (to trash staging area), reductions to the side (west) setback from 10 feet to five feet (to pool and patio decks) and from 10 feet to zero feet (to existing pavement and sidewalk), reductions to the side (south) setback from 10 feet to 7.4 feet (to building), from 10 feet to zero feet (to trash staging area), and from 10 feet to zero feet (to existing sidewalk and pavement), a reduction to the side (east) setback from 10 feet to five feet (to pool deck) and an increase to building height from 35 feet to . 85.08 feet (to roof deck) with an additional .5.67 feet for perimeter parapets (from roof deck), as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2- 803.C. The Community Development Board (CDB) APPROVED the application with the following bases and conditions: Bases for Approval: . 1. The proposal complies with the Flexible Development criteria as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project per Section 2- 803.C. 2. The proposal is in compliance with other standards in the Code including the General Applicability Criteria per Section 3 -913. 3. The development is compatible with the surrounding area and will enhance other redevelopment efforts. Conditions of Approval: 1. That the final design and color of the buildings be consistent with the conceptual elevations submitted to, or as modified by, the CDB; 2. That a Unity of Title be recorded in the public _records prior to the issuance of any permits; 3. That, prior to the issuance of any permits, a Minor Lot Adjustment be submitted to the Planning Department, approved and recorded in the public records; PRANK HIBBARD, MAYOR BILL- JONSON, VICE -MAYOR JOHN DORAN, COUNCILMEM ER HOYT HAM11:1-ON, COUNCILMPN4151T CARLHN A. PI I'F16EN, COUNCILME BER "I.OUAL EMPLOYMI.NT AND AFI�IRMAI'IVI{ ACTION EMPLOYI:R" February 22, 2006 Ghovaee — Page 2 4. That the condominium concierge office area be solely accessory to the attached dwellings on this property. This office area on the first floor shall not be converted to general tenant office space; 5. That, prior to the issuance of any permits, the civil plans be revised to curb the edges of pavement and provide wheel stops for the existing surface parking area on the west side; 6. That, prior to the issuance of any permits, the landscape plan be revised to show the west side of the site improved to the same standard as the new areas of the site, acceptable to the Planning Department; 7. That a condominium plat be recorded prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy; 8. That any future freestanding signs be monument -style designed to match the exterior materials and color of the buildings. The maximum height shall be four feet, unless approved at a height of six feet high through a Comprehensive Sign Program. Existing signage shall be brought into compliance with Code provisions; 9. That all proposed utilities (from the right -of -way to the proposed building) be placed underground. Conduits for the future undergrounding of existing utilities within the abutting right -of -way shall be installed along the entire site's street frontages prior to the issuance of a. Certificate of Occupancy. The applicant's representative shall coordinate the size and number of conduits with all affected utility providers (electric, phone, cable, etc.), with the exact location, size and number of conduits to be approved by the applicant's engineer and the City's Engineering Department prior to the commencement of work; 10. That all utility equipment including but not limited to wireless communication facilities, electrical and gas meters, etc. be screened from view and/or painted to match the building to which they are attached, as applicable, prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy; 11. That all Fire Department requirements be met prior to the issuance of any permits; 12. That all Parks and Recreation fees be paid prior to the issuance of any permits; and 13. That, prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy, traffic impact fees be assessed and paid. Pursuant to Section 4-407, an application for a building permit shall be made within one year of Flexible Development approval (February 21, 2007). All required certificates of occupancy shall be obtained within two years of the date of issuance of the building permit. Time frames do not change with successive owners. The Community Development Coordinator may grant an extension of time for a period not to exceed one year and only within the original period of validity. The Community Development Board may approve one additional extension of time after the community development coordinator's extension to initiate a building permit application. The issuance of this Development Order does not relieve you of the necessity to obtain any building permits or pay any impact fees that may be required. In order to facilitate the issuance of any permit or license affected by this approval, please bring a copy of this letter with you when applying for any permits or licenses that require this prior development approval. Additionally, an appeal of a Level Two approval (Flexible Development) may be initiated pursuant to Section 4 -502.B by the applicant or by any person granted party status within 14 days of the date of the CDB meeting. The filing of an application/notice of appeal shall stay the effect of the decision pending the final determination of the case. The appeal period for your case expires on January 31, 2006 (14 days from the date of the CDB meeting). February 22, 2006 Ghovaee — Page 3 If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call Wayne M. Wells, Planner III, at 727 -562 -4504. You can access zoning information for parcels within the City through our website: www.Myclearwater.com/ og v/depts /planning. ' *Make Us Your Favorite! Sincerely, Michael Delk ICP Planning Director S: (Planning DepartmentlC D BIFLEX (FLD) Vnactive or Finished ApplicationslGulfview S 678 Playa Del Sol (T) #/ Mixed Use - ApprovedlGulfview S 678 Development Order.doc IC U o 6 '7 6`7 Ni Patel DRB Presentation Intro Our firm has been retained to evaluate the proposed application with respect to: • The project's compliance with the City of Clearwater adopted land use and zoning regulations; • The project's compliance with the guidelines and design standards set forth for the South Beach /Clearwater Pass District in Beach by Design; • The impact to surrounding properties of the proposed building types, locations and uses. The project site is located in the tourist (T) district, and this site falls into the Residential Facilities High (RFH) land use category. It is also located in the South Beach /Clearwater Pass district of Beach by Design. This project is consistent with the proposed vision of South Beach as set forth in Beach by Design, which proposes a mix of uses, including high -rise condominiums, hotels and commercial use. Beach by Design also encourages individual mixed use projects. The project has been designed in compliance with Beach by Design standards. II. The proposed uses in the project are consistent with the surrounding land uses. This area has numerous condominium projects both on the Gulf frontage and on the Intercoastal frontage. The area is mixed, with retail, office and residential forming the fabric of this area of Clearwater Beach. A mixed use project will be compatible and consistent with Beach by Design guidelines. The Land Development Code establishes criteria for review of such infill project proposals. We have evaluated the proposal relative to those criteria and find the project consistent with the criteria's objectives. 1. The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development is otherwise economically impractical without deviations from the intensity and development standards. This project is intended to be a stimulus for new development as well as a standard for high -end residential. This project Page 1 of 4 • • would not be able to maintain its design uniformity, economic value or high - quality of design without the requested deviations. 2. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a comprehensive infill redevelopment proiect will not reduce the fair market value of abutting properties. The property's design will be an asset to the Clearwater Beach community and to the surrounding neighborhood. It will substantially upgrade the architectural component of the South Beach area. The proposed project will significantly add to the assessed value of the subject property, and will have a positive impact to surrounding properties. 3. The uses within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are otherwise permitted in the City of Clearwater. The city of Clearwater Land Use and Zoning encourage these types of high- density residential condominiums in their definitions for the HDR and T districts. 4. The uses or mix of uses within the comprehensive infill redevelopment proiect are compatible with adiacent land uses; The design is representative of the type of uses that are already seen in this district as well as the uses desired in the Beach by Design analysis and the Future Land Use Plan. The project proposal fits well within the mix and scale of uses already established or approved in this immediate area. 5. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a comprehensive infill redevelopment project will upgrade the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. The proposal will add value to the vicinity through its beautiful design, and furtherance of Beach by Design guidelines. 6. The design of the proposed comprehensive infill redevelopment proiect creates a form and function which enhances the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. This project will build on the vibrancy of the resort Page 2 of 4 r� C • community by adding to the more permanent population of the area as well as decreasing the overall traffic flow. 7. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks height and off - street Parking are iustified by the benefits to community character and the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. These reductions in setbacks are minor. This site has three frontages, and compliance with all setbacks would be extremely difficult. We feel the flexibility creates abetter design and is a clear improvement that provides benefit to the surrounding community. 8. Adequate off - street parking in the immediate vicinity accordinq to the shared parking formula in Division 14 of Article 3 will be available to avoid on- street parking in the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. All parking will be provided on site. The number of parking spaces provided exceeds that which is required in the Code. 9. The design of all buildings complies with the Tourist District design -guidelines in Division 5 of Article 3. The design complies with the tourist district flexible use section 2 -803. T 11. The site is located in the Clearwater Pass District of Beach by Design. This area is. defined as "mixed -use — high rise condominiums, resort hotels, recreation and tourist and neighborhood serving uses." The proposed project of 85 feet in height is in keeping with the described character of this district. Beach by Design discusses in depth the need for stimulus projects, and this proposal gives the Clearwater Pass District another opportunity for a landmark project. Page 3 of 4 r • The proposed improvements to the site will raise the standard for design by setting a precedent for future improvements in the area. III. The project is requesting two waivers to standards within the Tourist District - height and setbacks. It is my opinion that the increased height should be approved. We have prepared a graphic that demonstrates the height of surrounding structures in the immediate neighborhood. This graphic demonstrates that the proposed height of this project is consistent with Beach by Design guidelines, and presents a step -down effect from the taller structures on the Gulf frontage to the residential structures on the intracoastal waterway. It is also consistent with similarly situated projects in the Clearwater Beach community. The requested flexibility in setbacks is justified (1) due to the fact that the site has three street frontages, which significantly constrains the utility of the site if all three frontages must adhere to front yard setbacks, and (2) by the enhanced architecture and upgraded physical appearance of the site. Conclusion: In summary, it is our opinion that the proposed project is in conformity with the City of Clearwater's land development regulations, is consistent with the Beach by Design guidelines, and will provide a positive benefit to the surrounding Clearwater Beach Community. Page 4 of 4 1, • D ECEYE FEB 2 2 2006 f kl PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES C!, -, Y OF CLEARWATER Message Page 1 of 1 Wells, Wayne From: Jayne E. Sears [JayneS @jpfirm.com] Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2006 10:23 AM To: Wells, Wayne Cc: Doreen @northsideengineering.com; Ed Armstrong Subject: Sktel - FLD2005 -07071 - 678 S. Gulfview We have confirmed with the applicant that the proposed conditions of approval (1 through 13 on page 11 of staff report) are acceptable. Jayne E. Sears Legal Assistant Johnson, Pope, Bokor, Ruppel & Burns, LLP 911 Chestnut Street Clearwater, FL 33756 Phone: (727) 461 -1818 Fax: (727) 462 -0365 I 2/16/2006 I FAX COVER MEMO CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT 100 S. MYRTLE AVE. CLEARWATER, FL 33756 (727) 562 -4567 FAX: (727) 562 -4865 TO: Y a reAe% �j iV ar..,S / c%ol- FAX: .4- 1-19 � am0sAn FROM: Phone: S (O. DATE:_ Z� �- �O RE: (a 7 S S. C� V1 ✓�_ C �J —„�� J Q . MESSAGE: W NUMBER OF PAGES(INCLUDING THIS PAGE) Z' Feb. 14 2006 05:17PM YOUR LOGO YOUR FAX NO. 7275624865 NO. OTHER FACSIMILE START TIME USAGE TIME MODE PAGES RESULT 01 94468036 Feb.14 05:16PM 01'06 SND 02 OK TO TURN OFF REPORT, PRESS 'MENU' #04. THEN SELECT OFF BY USING ' +' OR " . �EhdL? I h JG F'EF'OF'T 0 Feb. 14 2006 05:19PM YOUR LOGO YOUR FAX NO. 7275624865 NO. OTHER FACSIMILE START TIME USAGE TIME MODE PAGES RESULT 01 94620365 Feb.14 05:18PM 01'01 _ SND 02 OK TO TURN OFF REPORT, PRESS 'MENU' U04. THEN SELECT OFF BY USING ' +' OR " . • ■ �� ••I •lira •4.�. •I « �•i.�1 • F1 :illy -M ' • . L,� CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT 100 S. MYRTLE AVE. CLEARWATER, FL 33756 (727) 562 -4567 FAX: (727) 562 -4865 T FAX: + % 2-' 494 (9 - 8 03 Q � q Phone: 1 b S/ / �- 3' Z. 8 6 FROM: Q vim- Y � e -Phone:---s 10.0 4 DATE:_ Z' : & 78 S• g � e.,.j 131 J , NUMBER OF PAGES(INCLUDING THIS PAGE)_ Feb. 13 2006 03:27PM YOUR LOGO YOUR FAX NO. 7275624865 NO. OTHER FACSIMILE START TIME USAGE TIME MODE PAGES RESULT 01 94468036 Feb.13 03:20PM 07'45 SND 08 OK TO TURN OFF REPORT, PRESS 'MENU' #04. THEN SELECT OFF BY USING ' +' OR " . '::;E[--ID I hdG F'EF'URT • Feb. 13 2006 03:12PM YOUR LOGO YOUR FAX NO. 7275624865 NO. OTHER FACSIMILE START TIME USAGE TIME MODE PAGES RESULT 01 94620365 Feb.13 03:08PM 03'40 SND 08 OK TO TUIRJ OFF REPORT, PRESS 'MENU' #04. THEN SELECT OFF BY USING ' +' OR " . Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Monday, February 13, 2006 12:58 PM To: Doreen Williams (E- mail); E. D. Armstrong Esquire (E -mail) Subject: Playa Del Sol, 678 S. Gulfview Blvd. Doreen and Ed - Attached is a copy of the Staff Report for FLD2005 -07071 for Playa Del Sol, 678 S. Gulfview Boulevard for the February 21, 2006, CDB meeting. Please let me know by noon on February 17, 2006, whether the conditions of approval are acceptable or not. Wayne ELJ Gulfview S 678 Staff Report.do... orthside • CIVIL • LAND PLANNING • ��tu�a II - ENVIRONMENTAL • P TRANSPORTATION • roject Director LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL Date: February 13, 2006 To: City of Clearwater Planning Dept. 100 Myrtle Ave Clearwater, FL Attn: Wayne Wells Reference: Playa Del Sol NES: 534 We Transmit: () Enclosed () Under Separate Cover () Originals () Mail () Courier (X) Prints () Pick -up (X) Hand Delivered () Addendum () Shop Drawings (X) Per Your Request () For Your Review & Comment () Specifications () For Your Use () For Your Approval () Applications () For Your Files () For Your Information () Floppy Disk COPIES DATE DESCRIPTION 15 2/13/06 Sheet C 1.1 (1 sheet) (1 signed & sealed) Comments: Copies To: File r Doreen A. Williams Project Director 601 CLEVELAND STREET, SUITE 930 CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33755 NESADMIN @MINDSPRING.COM NESTECH @MINDSPRING.COM 727 • 443 • 2869 FAX 727 • 446 • 8036 d31VMdV3T) 3O J111O 1.N3W1dVd3a 9NINNVId 900Z E 1 933 o3N3D3a 1VNl91ao 0 0 Wells, Wayne From: Ed Armstrong [EdA @jpfirm.com] Sent: Friday, February 10, 2006 8:26 PM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: RE: FLD2005- 07071, 678 S. Gulfview Blvd., Playa Del Sol yes, confirm. - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Wayne. Wells @myClearwater.com [ mailto :Wayne.Wells @myClearwater.com] Sent: Friday, February 10, 2006 6:15 PM To: Ed Armstrong Subject: FLD2005- 07071, 678 S. Gulfview Blvd., Playa Del Sol Ed - In the back of my pea brain I believe you have told me you represent Dr. Patel for this case and would like a copy of the Staff Report. Can you confirm? Wayne 1 FAX: +4- V - g>,)-3u Phone: q' 3 - L$ 6 9 FROM: Phone: 2-- +3-0 '- DATE:,— j `O RE: r-t_ P 2--o0 - 6 710 7 fkc,'O', 'pa ( 10 1 MESSAGE: 7 NUMBER OF PAGES(INCLUDING THIS PAGE) .3 :GF..Ir1 T hJl ; R�Pi iRT Feb. 10 2006 06:00PM YOUR LOGO YOUR FAX NO. 7275624865 NO. OTHER FACSIMILE START TIME USAGE TIME MODE PAGES RESULT 01 94468036 Feb.10 05:58PM 01'38 SND 03 OK TO TURN OFF REPORT: PRESS 'MENU' #04. THEN SELECT OFF BY USING ' +' OR �1' • • I •I • Ci •�� •I '� �•ti� •I :,III �� • � � r. Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Tuesday, February 07, 2006 7:34 PM To: Renee Ruggiero (E -mail) Cc: Doreen Williams (E- mail); Stephen R. Fowler (E -mail) Subject: FLD2005- 07071, 678 S. Gulfview Blvd. Renee - I am preparing my Staff Report for the above referenced project. I have discovered that the architectural plans (large scale, 24 "x36" sheets) are missing the floor plan for the 8th floor (reduced 8.5 "x14" plans include the 8th floor). Could you obtain the 8th floor plans from Mr. Fowler (15 copies) and collate them into the packages? I need them to be collated into the packages no later than early Thursday morning so they can be sent to the CDB (reminder: our offices close at 2:30 pm on Wednesday). Thanks. Wayne Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Friday, February 03, 2006 1:42 PM To: 'Jayne E. Sears' Cc: Doreen Williams (E- mail); Renee Ruggiero (E -mail) Subject: RE: Lot Adjustment Question Jayne - The approval of the Playa Del Sol project will be conditioned on the submission and approval of a Minor Lot Adjustment prior to the issuance of any permits for the Playa project. To submit for the Minor Lot Adjustment, the following must be submitted: 1. A "Letter of Request" to modify the lot lines between the two parcels as reflected in the attached surveys. This letter needs to include the names of the owner(s) of both parcels as shown on the most recent deed, and /or attach the deeds (this is for tracking through the Clerk of the Court records). 2. Application fee of $150. 3. The legal descriptions for the two parcels as they exist today (not just the "encroachment area" legal description). 4. Three signed and sealed surveys of each of the two parcels as they are desired (with the lot lines modified), including their legal description (Parcel A - "X" minus the "encroachment area "; Parcel B - "Y" plus the "encroachment area "). There is no deadline as to when the Minor Lot Adjustment is submitted. Depending on the amount of cases submitted requiring my time on those cases I have been assigned, please allow at least 2 -3 weeks for me to prepare the necessary documents and Development Order. I will prepare an "Affidavit" for recording (by you) and "Unity of Title" documents for both parcels. I will request a copies of the recorded documents, as well as a copy of a recorded deed transferring the "encroachment area" from Parcel A to Parcel B. Any questions, feel free to ask. Wayne - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Jayne E. Sears (mailto:JayneS @jpfirm.com] Sent: Thursday, February 02, 2006 4:37 PM To: Wells, Wayne Cc: Ed Armstrong Subject: Lot Adjustment Question We previously chatted about a minor lot adjustment on Dr. Patel's property and I understand the process, but I have a question. Please see the attached survey which shows a crosshatch of the "encroachment area ". The surveyor provided me with a legal of the "encroachment area" and as you can see it is currently located within Lots 9 and 10, proposed to be moved to Lots 17 and 18. Do I need to have the surveyor separate the "encroachment area" description into one legal for the portion located on Lot 9 (being moved to Lot 18) and one legal for the portion on Lot 10, being moved to Lot 17? Jayne E. Sears Legal Assistant Johnson, Pope, Bokor, Ruppel & Burns, LLP 1 .1 4 911 Chestnut Street Clearwater, FL 33756 Phone: (727) 461 -1818 Fax: (727) 462 -0365 <<LotAdj . pdf >> I I cNO'lo�' 5' CONCRETE SIDEWALK <!k WPP 06 .41 ro 6, —�,— `� — �� WPP-- - INLET� ao — — — "tSO CONCRETE N T SETBACK LINE \ APRON 27.0' 29.9' 3. 38, PGS. 38 -39 62.2' 1 o rn 'I ALT % s Q I :ING �d 5" LOT 8 BLOCK B Y C.B.S RCIAL IN >���:�.i! iii! s !i!i!�!�+!'iri!i!:�:�i::i.►►::� �. �I I ;l 0 1 -- TBM No. 2 - EL. -6.97 ASPHALT PARKING LOT 19 I LOT 18 BLOCK 8 ( BLOCK B WL_LvI�WM V1Q�� SWAIE� � 62.2' LOT 11 BLOCK B (2) STORY C.B.S. _'ADDRESS 0678C CONCRETE PARKING UNDER BUILDING GARAGE EL. -6.72 - -- GRASS 0.7' CONC. WALL CONC. WALK DRAINAGE EASEMENT --� O.R.B. 10971, PAGES 398 -400 I (1) STORY C.B.S. ADDRESS •672 I COMMERCIAL 10' SETBACK LINE P.B. 38, PGS. 38 -39 Awn ® Lot Rd' ks-rme n'r 0.8'� CONC. OND DRAINAGE SIDEWALK EASEMENT - O.R.B. 10971, PAGES 408-410 LOT 17 , LOT 16 BLOCK B BLOCK B I I 5.4 5.4 25.0' 1 PARKING EASEMENT l7 O.R.B. 6835, PGS. 1731 -1732 J a 5" I (2) STORY C.B.S. I ASPHALT ADDRESS 0678D NCRE h 41 PARKING I CONCRETE PARKING UNDER w PARKING BUILDING o z w see u GARAGE EL. -6.18 �° I LOT 10 m� T IPLF1 LOT 9 BLOCK B . r- w r*m m m N ao j K BLOCK B LnN -+Mo z m�� N z pz N z ENCROACHMENT I EASEMENT 5.4' 1 A fjl \� \ 69� aJ O.R.B. 7173, PGS. 1896 -1899 LANTER NO -DTI 25.4' 62.2' PLM4TER -9 T, N oz 0 0 - -- — 6' SWALE � sse CONCRETE FS ASPH PARK/ tT PARKING EASEMENT O.R. 6835, PGS. 1731 -1732 11- - /4' CONCRETE SIDEWALK sPILLwnr 5.5' IN >���:�.i! iii! s !i!i!�!�+!'iri!i!:�:�i::i.►►::� �. �I I ;l 0 1 -- TBM No. 2 - EL. -6.97 ASPHALT PARKING LOT 19 I LOT 18 BLOCK 8 ( BLOCK B WL_LvI�WM V1Q�� SWAIE� � 62.2' LOT 11 BLOCK B (2) STORY C.B.S. _'ADDRESS 0678C CONCRETE PARKING UNDER BUILDING GARAGE EL. -6.72 - -- GRASS 0.7' CONC. WALL CONC. WALK DRAINAGE EASEMENT --� O.R.B. 10971, PAGES 398 -400 I (1) STORY C.B.S. ADDRESS •672 I COMMERCIAL 10' SETBACK LINE P.B. 38, PGS. 38 -39 Awn ® Lot Rd' ks-rme n'r 0.8'� CONC. OND DRAINAGE SIDEWALK EASEMENT - O.R.B. 10971, PAGES 408-410 LOT 17 , LOT 16 BLOCK B BLOCK B J"..'Northside January 23, 2006 Mr. Wayne Wells Planner III City of Clearwater Planning Department 100 S. Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, FL 33756 RE: FLD2005 -07071 678 S. Gulfview Blvd. Dear Mr. Wells: 0 ORIGINAL RECEIVED JAN 2 5 2006 CIVIL • LAND PLANNING • ENVIRONMENTAL • TRANSPORTATION • PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER Listed below are our responses to the final outstanding issues on the above site. Landscape 1. All the edges on the existing west side of the site which are to remain have been curbed. Wheel stops have been added to existing parking which is to remain. See Sheet C3.1 Land Resource 1. Rick Albee originally stated that "trees 1, 2, 6, 7 and 8 needed to be preserved and all utilities be relocated to avoid being run under canopies ". After a meeting with Rick, it is understood that these trees cannot be preserved as there is no place to move the utilities in order to stay clear of their canopies. The developer has agreed to add to the tree preservation fund at $48.00 per inch. Parks and Rees i . It is acknowledged that open space /recreation impact fees are due prior to the issuance of building permits or final plat which ever occurs first. Traffic Engineering 1. Bennett Elbo had one outstanding condition "accessible rout from handicap parking space on the first floor to elevator forces user to share rout with vehicles. Revise to provide for safety of accessible route user ". The plan has been revised and approved by Bennett via facsimile. See Sheet C3.1 for revision. Zoning 1. Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria #1 has been revised to state how the redevelopment of the site is impractical without deviations. 2. All potential conditions of approval are acknowledged and acceptable. 601 CLEVELAND STREET, SUITE 930 CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33755 N E sELD280MMIP RING.COM Page- 1 -of 2 NE5TECH @MIND5PRIN6.COM 727 • 443 • 2869 FAX 727 • 446 • 8036 Mr. Wayne Wells January 23, 2006 Page Two 3. The 8.5" x 14" legal descriptions provided have been labeled on the original survey for the vacation of easements and Civil Staking Plan for easements which are to be recorded. 4. The former "storage" building, which is now a maintenance building no longer has the door to the outside sidewalk in the front of the building. See architectural plans for revision. 5. The Civil plans, Sheet C3.1 show the existing parking area to remain as well as all other drawing sheets. 6. Site Data Table has been revised to show the correct parking spaces at 4/1000 for offices. See Sheet C 1.1 7. The Site Data Table has been corrected to show 3,650 square feet of office, 27 attached dwelling units and 4 overnight accommodations. See Sheet C 1.1 8. Architect has submitted Sheet A -02 (overnight accommodations building elevations). 9. Sheet C1.1 has been recalculated for the,proposed Vehicular Use Area (VUA). - If there are any additional comments, please do not hesitate to call. Sincerely, oreen A. Williams Project Director FLD2005 -07071 Page - 2 - of 2 North�i�e • LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL Date: January 24, 2006 To: Mr. Wayne Wells, Planner III Planning Department 100 S. Myrtle Ave #210 Clearwater, FL 33755 Reference: Playa Del Sol — 678 S. Gulfview Blvd NES Proj# 554/534 We Transmit: Enclosed Mail Pick -Up Per Your Request X_ For Your Use For Your Files Under Separate Cover UPS Overnight X Hand Delivered For Your Review & Comment For Your Approval For Your Information CIVIL • LAND PLANNING • ENVIRONMENTAL• TRANSPORTATION • X Originals X_ Prints Addendum Shop drawings Specifications Applications Floppy Disk 15 Response Letters 15 Comp Infill Application with Narrative 15 Civil Sheets C'1.1 & (3.1, Signed and Sealed 15 Reduced Architectural Elevations 15 Architectural Sheets A01.1, A2.1 & A02 Please contact us at (727) 443 -2869 should you have any questions or comments. (� - Copies To: By- ,.. '_ reen A. Williams; Project Director File N. Pelzer ORIGINAL RECEIVED JAN 2 55 L0" 11)6 601 CLEVELAND STREET, SUITE 930 PLANNING Uc17,ItIIdIENT CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33755 NESADMIN @MINDSPRING.COM CITY OF CLEA 4 "iAl- R NESTECH @MINDSPRING.COM 727 • 443 • 2869 FAX 727 • 446 • 8036 f 0 1, D � gTER LONG RANGE PLANNING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW Cl ITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT POST OFFICE Box 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758 -4748 MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562 -4865 January 24, 2006 Mr. Housh Ghovaee Northside Engineering Services Inc. 601 Cleveland Street, Suite # 930 Clearwater, Florida 33755 Re: Community Development Board Meeting (Case No. FLD2005- 07071) Dear Mr. Ghovaee: The Case No. FLD2005 -07071 for Flexible Development approval to permit a mixed use (3,650 square feet of office floor area, 27 attached dwellings and four overnight accommodation rooms /units) with reductions to the front (north along Bayway Blvd) setback from 15 feet to 9.6 feet (to building), from 15 feet to five feet (to existing pavement) and from 15 feet to zero feet (to trash staging area), reductions to the front (east along Parkway Drive) setback from 15 feet to 10.3 feet (to building) and from 15 feet to zero feet (to dumpster enclosure), reductions to the side (west) setback from 10 feet to five feet (to pool and patio decks) and from 10 feet to zero feet (to existing pavement and sidewalk), reductions to the side (south) setback from 10 feet to 7.4 feet (to building), from 10 feet to zero feet (to dumpster enclosure), and from .10 feet to zero feet (to existing sidewalk and pavement), a reduction to the side (east) setback from 1.0 feet to five feet (to pool deck) and an increase to building height from 35 feet to 85.08 feet (to roof deck) with an additional 5.67 feet for perimeter parapets (from roof deck), as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2- 803.C, for property located at 678 South Gulfview Boulevard, has been scheduled to be reviewed by the Community Development Board on February 21, 2006. The meeting will take place at 1:00 p.m. in the City Council Chambers, 3rd floor of City Hall at 112 S. Osceola Avenue, Clearwater. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call me at 727 -562 -4504. Sincerely, Wr,L-M.� Wa e M. Wells, AICP Planner III S: (Planning DepartmentlCD BIFLEX (FLD)IPending caseslUp for the next CDBIGulfview S 678 Playa Del Sol (T) #1 Mixed Use 2.21.06 CDB - WWIGulfview S 678 CDB Letter.doc FRANK HIBBARD, MAYOR BILL JONSON, VICE -MAYOR JOHN DORAN, COUNCIL MEMBER HOYT HAMILTON, COUNCILMFMBER CARLEN A. PETERSEN, COUNCIL \1EM1IBER "EQUAL, EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER" Northsimde LAND PLANNINI6 • ,,,,, ENVIRONMENTAL* SwAaa �Nc. TRANSPORTATION • LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL Date: January 11, 2006 Copies Description ORIGINAL 1 Sherry L. Watkins, Administrative Analyst RECEIVED City of Clearwater Planning Department Flex Development Application (Comp. InCill) 100 S. Myrtle Ave, #210 JAN 112006 Letter of Authorization &Affidavits Clearwater, FL 33756 15 Warranty Deeds PLANNING DEPARTMENT Reference: Playa Del Sol / FLD2005 -07071 CITY OF CLEARWATER NES Proj# 0554//534 15 We Transmit: 15 X Originals 15 Stormwater Report &Narrative (1 Signed And Sealed) X_ Prints X Enclosed Under Separate Cover Addendum Mall., UPS Overnight Shop drawings Civil & Landscape Drawings (6 Sheets), 1 Signed And Sealed Pick -Up X Hand Delivered Specifications 15 8.5" X 11" Civil Site Plan Applications 15 Floppy Disk Please contact us at (727) 443 -2869 should you have any questions or comments. Copies To: FILE By. N. PELZER oreen A. Williams, Project Director A.HAINES 601 CLEVELAND STREET, SUITE 930 CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33755 NESADMIN @MINDSPRING.COM NESTECHQMINDSPRING.COM 727 • 443 • 2869 FAX 727 • 446 8036 Copies Description 1 Comments Letter 15 Flex Development Application (Comp. InCill) 15 Letter of Authorization &Affidavits 15 Warranty Deeds 15 Surveys 15 Easements And Vacations (8 Total),-- 15 24 X 36 Architectural Drawings 15 Stormwater Report &Narrative (1 Signed And Sealed) 15 Tree Inventory &Report 15 Civil & Landscape Drawings (6 Sheets), 1 Signed And Sealed 15 8.5" X 11" Civil Site Plan 15 8.5" X 11 "Colored Landscape Plan 15 8.5 X 1T" Colored Renderings 15 8.5 X 11 "Building Elevations 1 Color chip att Please contact us at (727) 443 -2869 should you have any questions or comments. Copies To: FILE By. N. PELZER oreen A. Williams, Project Director A.HAINES 601 CLEVELAND STREET, SUITE 930 CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33755 NESADMIN @MINDSPRING.COM NESTECHQMINDSPRING.COM 727 • 443 • 2869 FAX 727 • 446 8036 ached to Original Arc. Drawing 15 24 X 36 Architectural Drawings Please contact us at (727) 443 -2869 should you have any questions or comments. Copies To: FILE By. N. PELZER oreen A. Williams, Project Director A.HAINES 601 CLEVELAND STREET, SUITE 930 CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33755 NESADMIN @MINDSPRING.COM NESTECHQMINDSPRING.COM 727 • 443 • 2869 FAX 727 • 446 8036 Northside CIVIL • LAND PLANNING • C-- 4" s� gae ENVIRONMENTAL • �jW� TRANSPORTATION • January 9, 2006 Mr. Wayne Wells III ORIGINAL Planner City of Clearwater Planning Department RECEIVED 111 S. Myrtle Avenue JAN 112006 Clearwater, FL 33756 RE: FLD2005 -07071 678 S. Gulfview Blvd, Dear Mr. Wells: PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER Listed below are our outstanding DRC comments dated December 21, 2005. LANDSCAPE: 1. Site and Landscape plan are now coordinated to show trees being preserved. 2. - Additional trees and tree types have been added to foundation landscaping. 3. Vertical 6" curb now shown on all sheets. 4. VUA has been recalculated. 5. Landscape Table on Sheet LL 1 has been corrected. LAND RESOURCES 1. Utilities have been re- routed to avoid trees which are to be reserved. ZONING CONDITIONS 1. Existing parking easement to the west will be retained. 2. See architectural plan in regards to roof top mechanical equipment and screening. 3. Proposed monument signs have been revised to meet 5' setback. 4. 'Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project Criteria #1 has been revised to explain how we are compatible with surrounding parcels. 5 General Applicability Criteria #1 has been revised to correct directions of adjacent properties. 6. Description of Request has been revised to explain concierge service. 7. Architect has revised plan to show dimensional lines. 8. All the revised legal descriptions which were attached have the description of the requests on the bottom left corner. 9. There is no longer storage area, not building maintenance room and the door does not have access from the sidewalk. 10: Architectural plans now show building elevations for overnight accommodations. 11. Architect has made doors and windows coordinate. 12. Description of request narrative has been changed to read "condo /concierge office. 601 CLEVELAND STREET, SUITE 930 CLEARWATER, FLORIDA'33755 NESADMIN @MINDSPRING.COM NESTECH ®MINDSPRING.COM 727 - 443 - 2869 FAX 727 - 446 - 8036 Mr. Wayne Wells ORIGINAL January 11, 2006 RECEIVED Page Two JAN 112006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER ZONING continued 13. All dimensions are shown on civil plans. 14. Architect has provided proposed color schemes and revised elevations. 15. Northwest parking showing existing parking easement for Walgreens will remain as is. 16. Gotta love the cad designers! Vault line has been lightened for clarity. 17. Building addition to the west is for parking on the 2nd floor. 18. See note stating dumpster enclosure will be of masonry stucco similar to building and painted "soft apricot" in color, also the gate color and material has been noted. 19. The site data table has been revised showing the correct parking calculation. 20. Description of request has been revised regarding 4' to 5' sidewalk as well as drawings corrected to show 5' sidewalk. 21. Four parking spaces for overnight accommodations will be located on site. Access has been provided from Building A through pool and condo to access parking. 22. Mixed Use calculations have been corrected. See attached. 23. Additional landscaping has been added to the northwest corner of the building. 24. Existing and proposed properties lines are now shown on Sheet C3.1. 25. Walgreens dumpster and staging area has been noted on plans. Walgreens will roll- out dumpster to staging area. 26. Sheets AO1.1A and A -01.2A match. This concludes our DRC responses. Please direct any additional comments if necessary: Sincerely, Aaoreen AA. Williams Project Director • Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Wednesday, January 04, 2006 1:41 PM To: Stephen R. Fowler (E -mail) Subject: Patel density Mixed Use :alculation for Play.. • Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Tuesday, January 03, 2006 4:28 PM To: Stephen R. Fowler (E -mail) Subject: Playa Del Sol Steve - I just received your fax regarding the elevation with the dimension from BFE to roof deck. This dimension shown on the small drawing is what I have been requesting to be placed on the elevation drawings. I assume you will be making this change to the large scale drawings. Thanks. Wayne FROG : • PHONE NO. : • JAN. 03 2006 04:32PM P1 FOWLER ASSOCIATES ARCHITECTS, INC. 1,421 COURT STREET CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 337156 1i21)+449- -2021 FAX (121)4-41-5339 DATE: OCR PROJECT:'• PROJECT: �a TO: G 'S ua l FAX #: ATTN: FROM: NOTES: u I s .e, a to Iro v 0 v Number of a es Including ' A9 9 cover: HARDCOPY TO FOLLOW; Ax 0 M rl 3980M ul MMM II 111 i11 17.;-.1 7'7'j7'7 11L jw 'n, �.111 -11i =AM I ............. r I LH - Ll M.. M.M.... 1 7... 17 i :: F its, 1 1-:� 7 a WOM 10 199 am ii Affillil oxvi. ... M..7. is 7.7. in z, i sim 11RON1. . Wi. i . n-.7... i I � i fp- i,, I ii.. i . m... i IRV iin vi 4f I Mi -5.11 IIHM (!' �_u .� u�u' u u Ir... OW .IM17. " • -..aW -�Ql- w f f it'l Irr - .�,v,' ^-. —` ._. `..■ I z x — � ✓_- . �g ?.x't -':;h �:e•• I' - -'— •� � —iICI{ Iunl — iii -11 -=��3 : � � �:� � i �:��i�w$9.►w3�� �i1 ........... 777, .... I'll's 0. 0 Wells, Wayne From: doreen [ doreen @northsideengineering.com] Sent: Thursday, December 22, 2005 2:50 PM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: Playa Del Sol New address. 671 Bayway Blvd B1ackBerry service provided by Nextel Wells, Wayne From: Rice, Scott Sent: Thursday, December 22, 2005 2:26 PM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: FW: 678 S. Gulfview FYI D. Scott Rice Land DeveL Engr. Manager 727 - 562 -4781 scott.rice @MyClearwater.com - - - -- Original Message---- - From: FOWLERARCH @aol.com [mailto:FOWLERARCH @ aol.com] Sent: Thursday, December 22, 2005 2:25 PM To: Rice, Scott Cc: WCN531 @aol.com; renee @northsideengineering.com Subject: Re: 678 S. Gulfview Page 1 of 1 Scott, We are in the process of revising the ground floor parking /drives where the ground floor parking will enter /exit from the side street and the ramp will enter /exit from N. Bayway. This plan should get to your office late today or tomorrow. Thank you for your help in this project. Steve Fowler 449 -2021 12/22/2005 Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Thursday, December 22, 2005 2:23 PM To: Doreen Williams (E -mail) Cc: Renee Ruggiero (E -mail) Subject: FW: FLD2005- 07071, 678 S. Gulfview Blvd. Doreen - Just needed to correct one of the Zoning comments. There are 88 parking spaces now shown on the site and building plans, not the 80 1 stated I counted, as there are eight additional on the second floor on the west side. Wayne - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Thursday, December 22, 2005 2:12 PM To: Doreen Williams (E -mail) Cc: Renee Ruggiero (E -mail) Subject: FLD2005- 07071, 678 S. Gulfview Blvd. Doreen - I have previously sent to you Traffic Engineering and Fire Department comments on the most recent resubmittal. I will be faxing to you Land Resource, Landscaping and Zoning comments that still need to be addressed. Comments still needing to be addressed are marked with an asterisk *. I would strongly suggest, prior to resubmitting any documents to this office, that some time is spent on reading the narrative material part of the application to ensure information and directions (north, south, east and west) are correct in relation to the site, landscaping and architectural plans AND that the site, landscaping and architectural plans are coordinated between themselves. My frustration level is growing regarding this project and my patience growing thin. It is not my responsibility to check your plans for consistency between narratives and plans, but rather is yours as the representative for this project. This project is attempting to be scheduled for the February 21, 2006, CDB agenda. Revised plans and application materials must be submitted no later than noon on January 11, 2006, to determine compliance with all DRC comments (as revised due to resubmittals). If you would like to meet to go over one set of the revised plans and application materials prior to copying to meet the resubmittal deadline, feel free to contact me. Wayne 0 0 Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Thursday, December 22, 2005 2:12 PM To: Doreen Williams (E -mail) Cc: Renee Ruggiero (E -mail) Subject: FLD2005- 07071, 678 S. Gulfview Blvd. Doreen - have previously sent to you Traffic Engineering and Fire Department comments on the most recent resubmittal. I will be faxing to you Land Resource, Landscaping and Zoning comments that still need to be addressed. Comments still needing to be addressed are marked with an asterisk . I would strongly suggest, prior to resubmitting any documents to this office, that some time is spent on reading the narrative material part of the application to ensure information and directions (north, south, east and west) are correct in relation to the site, landscaping and architectural plans AND that the site, landscaping and architectural plans are coordinated between themselves. My frustration level is growing regarding this project and my patience growing thin. It is not my responsibility to check your plans for consistency between narratives and plans, but rather is yours as the representative for this project. This project is attempting to be scheduled for the February 21, 2006, CDB agenda. Revised plans and application materials must be submitted no later than noon on January 11, 2006, to determine compliance with all DRC comments (as revised due to resubmittals). If you would like to meet to go over one set of the revised plans and application materials prior to copying to meet the resubmittal deadline, feel free to contact me. Wayne FAX COVER MEMO CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT 100 S. MYRTLE AVE. CLEARWATER, FL 33756 (727) 562 -4567 FAX: (727) 562 -4865 TO: FAX: q- 4 t� " 2036 Phone: 4:+3. ` z 8 (o 2 FROM: Wam Phone: S 62 3-0 DATE:. I 2:70 DJ- RE: 7 S BV 1"-t--P 7-005-- 07V? MESSAGE: NUMBER OF PAGES(INCLUDING THIS PAGE) 6 C'41--evse-k t 4 C.Fh•In T hI,, PFPI IPT • Dec. 22 2005 02:18PM YOUR LOGO YOUR FAX NO. 7275624865 NO. OTHER FACSIMILE START TIME USAGE TIME MODE PAGES RESULT 01 94468036 Dec.22 02:14PM 04'00 SND 09 OK TO TURN OFF REPORT, PRESS 'MENU' #104. THEN SELECT OFF BY USING ' +' OR FOR FAX ADVANTAGE ASSISTANCE, PLEASE CALL 1- 800—FELP —FAX (435- 7329). Conditions Associated With ' ;' FLD2005 -07071 try"'` , S, 678 S GULFVIEW BLVD Fire Condition Leonard Rickard 562 -4327 x3062 11/27/2005 Provide Fire Flow Calculations / Water Study by a FIRE PROTECTION ENGINEER to assure an Not Met adequate water supply is available and to determine if any upgrades are required by the developer due to the impact of this project. Calculations / Water Study due PRIOR TO CDB. 12/15/2005 Water Flow Calculations Insufficiant. Calculations Must meet NFPA 1142 to include ANNEX H Landscape Wayne Wells, AICP 727 - 562 -4504 09/28/2005 12/21/05 - WW Not Met Site and Landscape Plan continues to on show the trees that are being preserved nor is coordinated as to new trees being proposed under the canopy of existing trees being preserved. Revise. 11/29/05 - WW Comment still applicable, as there are existing trees indicated on photographs from a site visit that are not shown on the plans nor indicated as to being preserved or*to be removed (such as west of the westernmost building - east of Walgreens, adjacent to Parkway Drive and south of easternmost building - north of Subway). 9/28/05 - WW Show on the civil and landscape plans all existing trees, with an indication as to whether they are being retained /preserved or being removed. 09/28/2005 12/21/05 - WW Not Met Landscape plan still does not comply. Foundation landscaping with trees is required along the north and east sides of the proposed building (facing Bayway Blvd. and Parkway Drive) and along the south side of the existing building (facing S. Gulfview Blvd.). Revise Sheet 1-1.1. 11/29/05 - WW Comment is still applicable. In some areas only two palms are shown to be planted (north and east of proposed building) and insufficient numbers south of existing to remain overnight accommodation building. 9/28/05 - WW Ensure that the number of trees for the foundation landscape area are being met per Section 3- 1202.E.2 (at least two accent trees (or palm equivalents) or three palms for every 40 linear feet of building facade). 09/28/2005 12/21/05 - WW Not Met No sheet indicates that 6" vertical curbing is to be installed in such areas. Indicate on Sheet C3.1. 11/2b/05 - WW Comment still applicable. 9/28/05 - WW Show on Sheets C2.1, C3.1 and L1.1 all edges of pavement for open parking areas, including the existing parking area on the west side, being curbed. Provide wheel stops for the four parking spaces in the southwest side. 11 /29/200 12/21/05 - WW Not Met Based on the revised plan adding building to the west side of the proposed building, it would appear (although I am not sure that there is a floor as part of this building addition on the west side) that the vehicular use area (VUA) square footage may be reduced. Recalculate square footage of VUA and revise the Site Data table appropriately. 11/29/05 - WW Site data table on Sheet C1.1 indicates 6,173 square feet of proposed paved vehicular use area CaseConditons Print Date: 12/22/2005 Page 1 of 8 0 0 FLD2005 -07071 678 S GULFVIEW BLVD Landscape Wayne Wells, AICP 727 - 562 -4504 (VUA). Interior landscaping required at ten percent of the VUA is 617 square feet. Site data table also indicates 844 square feet of proposed interior landscaping, yet is indicated at only 1.98 percent (should be 13.67 percent ?). Revise percentage. 12/21/2005 Revise the quantities in the Landscape Table on Sheet 1-1.1 to show 185 VS (not 235) and 177 IH Not Met (not 167). Indicate what landscape treatment is being proposed in all areas not indicated with the landscape materials in the Landscape Table (such as sod). Land Resource Condition Rick Albee 727 - 562 -4741 09/22/2005 11/28/08 -Show trees # 1,2,6,7 and 8 to be preserved. Relocate ALL utilities from under their Not Met canopies prior to CDB. 12/16/05 -Re -route utilities instead of removing the trees. Additional comments will be forthcoming at building permit. 09/22/2005 Provide a Tree Preservation Plan prepared by a certified arborist, consulting arborist, landscape Not Met architect or other specialist in the field of arboriculture. This plan must show how the proposed building, parking, stormwater and utilities impact the critical root zones (drip lines) of trees to be preserved and how you propose to address these impacts ie; crown elevating, building lintels, root pruning and /or root aeration systems. Other data required on this plan must show the trees canopy line, actual tree barricade limits (2/3 of the drip line and /or in the root prune lines if required), and the tree barricade detail. And any other pertinent information the arborist feels relates to tree preservation. Provide prior to building permit. Parks & Recs Condition Debbie Reid 562 -4818 11/17/2005 Open space /recreation impact fees are due prior to issuance of building permits or final plat (if Not Met applicable) whichever occurs first. These fees could be substantial and it is recommended that you contact Art Kader at 727 - 562 -4824 to calculate the assessment. Traffic Eng Condition Bennett Elbo 562 -4775 11/21/2005 1. Handicap parking spaces must meet the minimum vertical clear height of 8 feet 2 inches (8'2") Not Met including entrance, route, parking space and exit per Florida Building Code. 12/14/05 - ACKNOWLEDGED 2. Florida Building Code Section 406.2.2 requires a minimum .7 -foot clear height in parking garages. Will parking spaces under ramps meet this requirement? 12/14/05 - SEE APPLICANT RESPONSE 3. Objects inside sight distance triangles must not exceed the City's vertical height limitations. (City's Community Development Code, Section 3 -904) 12/14/05 - OBJECTS EXIST WITHIN SIGHT TRIANGLES. WHAT PROVISIONS WILL BE MADE TO PROVIDE PEDESTRIAN AND VEHICULAR SAFETY? 4. The two driveways along N. Bayway Blvd. do not meet the City's 125' minimum driveway separation for access management. 12/14/05 - NOT MET 5. Demonstrate how a parked motorist can exit out of the parallel parking space(s). 12/14/05 - NOT MET All of the above to be addressed prior to CDB. General note: Comply with the current Transportation Impact Fee Ordinance and fee schedule. Print Date: 12/22/2005 Page 2 of 8 CaseConditons 0 FLD2005 -07071 678 S GULFVIEW BLVD Zoning Condition Wayne Wells, AICP 727 - 562 -4504 09/02/200 _ 12/21/05 - WW Not Met Comment is still applicable. See additional comment regarding existing parking area on the west side (being retained or being removed ? ?). 11/29/05 - WW Comment is still applicable. 9/28/05 & 9/2/05 - WW Depict by shading or crosshatching all required parking lot interior landscaped areas and include the square footages of all areas being counted toward the interior landscaping. 09/02/2005 12/21/05 & 11 /29/05 - WW Not Met Comment still applicable. Alternately, provide a rooftop plan. 9/2/05 - WW Indicate on the building elevations that the outdoor mechanical units are proposed on the roof. Indicate screening materials. 07/09/2005 12/21/05 - WW Not Met Sheet C3.1 - Proposed monument sign shown does not meet the required five -foot setback (revise). 11/29/05 - WW Comment is still applicable. Signage must be shown at least in concept as indicated below to review relationship to other site improvements, including landscaping, and to building design. 9/28/05 & 9/2/05 & 7/9/05 - WW Show at least in concept all proposed freestanding and attached signs; showing on Sheets C2.1, C3.1 and L1.1 the location and setback from property lines of proposed freestanding signage and on the building elevations the location of proposed attached signage. Details may come later through the building permit review process or through the submission of a Comprehensive Sign Program application. Also address existing signage, which will be required to be brought into conformance with Code requirements (provide at least photographs of existing signage). 09/29/2005 12/21/05 - WW Not Met Just because there are three front setbacks to be met, doesn't justify why the setback reductions are being requested. Inadequate justification is provided. Revise. 11/29/05 - WW Comment is still applicable. Potentially the site is being overbuilt if significant deviations are being requested, especially required parking. 9/29/05 - WW Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria #1 response: Provide the justification as to HOW this proposal is "otherwise impractical without deviations from the use, intensity and development standards." Be specific. 09/29/2005 12/21/05 - WW Not Met Revise the directions for many of the statements. Look at the north arrow when writing about surrounding development, as none of your directions are accurate. 11/29/05 - WW Comment is still applicable. 9/29/05 - WW General Applicability criteria #1 response: Correct the directions of surrounding development. Additionally, most of the townhomes are 31 feet to the midroof point and the condos at 692 Bayway is 42 feet to the roof deck. Provide more detailed information as to HOW this proposal is "in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties." 09/28/20* 12/21/05 - WW Not Met Include in the "Description of Request" a statement(s) regarding the concierge service in the one "office" area as to what services will be provided. Any approval of this request will be conditioned on this "office" area being restricted in use to be solely accessory to the dwellings and no CaseConditons Print Date: 12/22/2005 Page 3 of 8 0 FLD2005 -07071 678 S GULFVIEW BLVD • Zoning Condition Wayne Wells, AICP 727- 562 -4504 occupational license as a separate office will be issued. 11 /29/05 - WW Unclear why a "management office" is necessary for 27 condos. Other projects of similar or larger number of units have not provided such an "office." Provide greater details and justification for such "management office." Alternately, remove such office. 9/28/05 - WW Site and building plans indicate an "office" next to the "shop" with a "storage" area to the rear of the "shop." Unclear what this "office" is for, since it doesn't have any clear access to it. If for the condos, still unclear why such is necessary, since there is a "clubhouse" on the ground level and a "gameroom" and "fitness center" on the second floor. Advise /revise. 09/28/2005 Potential condition of approval: Not Met That any future freestanding sign be a monument -style sign and be designed to match the exterior materials and color of the building. The maximum height shall be four feet, unless approved at six feet high through a Comprehensive Sign Program; 09/28/2005 Potential condition of approval: Not Met That all Parks and Recreation fees be paid prior to the issuance of any permits; 09/28/2005 Potential condition of approval: Not Met That a condominium plat be recorded prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy; 09/28/2005 Potential condition of approval: Not Met That all proposed utilities (from the right -of -way to the proposed building) be placed underground. Conduits for the future undergrounding of existing utilities within the abutting right -of -way shall be installed along the entire site's street frontages prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. The applicant's representative shall coordinate the size and number of conduits with all affected utility providers (electric, phone, cable, etc.), with the exact location, size and number of conduits to be approved by the applicant's engineer and the City's Engineering Department prior to the commencement of work; 07/09/2005 12/21/05 - WW Not Met LAST REQUEST - ARCHITECT MUST PLACE A DIMENSION LINE FROM BFE TO THE HIGHEST ROOF DECK FOR THE NEW BUILDING WITH A DIMENSION FOR THIS BUILDING HEIGHT. I CANNOT MAKE THIS ANY CLEARER. IF TOTALLY NOT UNDERSTOOD OR THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS COMMENT, PLEASE CALL ME (562- 4504). 11/30/05 - WW Provide a dimension line from BFE to the highest roof deck for the new building. 9/28/05 & 9/2/05 & 7/9/05 - WW Indicate on the building elevations the height of the building from BFE to the highest roof deck (not ceiling), as well as the height of the parapet from the roof deck of the highest roof deck. Ensure these heights are indicated in the site data table on Sheet C1.1. 09/28/2005 Potential condition of approval: Not Met That all Fire Department requirements be met prior to the issuance of any permits; 09/28/2005 Potential condition of approval: Not Met That any future storage units on the ground floor be used for storage only, in compliance with all Federal Emergency Management Administration (FEMA) rules and guidelines. Should such storage units be proposed and approved by Staff as a Minor Revision to this approval, evidence of this restriction of use, embodied in condominium documents, homeowner's documents, deed restrictions or like forms, shall be submitted to the Building Official prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy; 09/28/2005 Potential condition of approval: Not Met That a Unity of Title be recorded in the public records prior to the issuance of any permits; 09/28/2005 Potential condition of approval: Print Date: 12/22/2005 Page 4 of 8. Not Met CaseConditons 0 FLD2005 -07071 678 S GULFVIEW BLVD :7 Zoning Condition Wayne Wells, AICP 727 - 562 -4504 That the final design and color of the building be consistent with the conceptual elevations submitted to, or as modified by, the CDB; 09/29/2005 Potential condition of approval: Not Met That, prior to the issuance of any permits, a Minor Lot Adjustment be approved and recorded in the public records; 07/08/2005 12/21/05 - WW Not Met Comment below for 11/30/05 still is applicable. Additionally, many legal descriptions have been ^` submitted with no explanation as to what these are for and there is no overall plan /survey as to where these are located on the site. Need to provide complete information as I am not going to try to figure this out. 11/30/05 - WW Need to be more specific as to what portion of the parking lot easement is proposed to be terminated. No 8.5 "x11" sketch was attached to the response letter dated 10/4/05. The "cross parking easement" document (signed August 25, 2000) submitted is not a complete document (not all pages submitted) nor is it recorded. Submit a copy of the complete, recorded document. 9/28/05 - WW It is unclear whether the aplicant will be attempting to terminate the entire parking easement or only a portion. Staff will not support a termination of the entire parking easement (see comment under 7/8/05 below). 9/2/05 - WW The comment below is still applicable. 7/8/05 - WW Note: Description of Request narrative indicates that the parking easement on this property on the north side is being terminated by this owner. There may be a Zoning Code issue with such termination, as this parking may be required parking for the adjoining businesses. Provide documentation that such parking is not required parking for these adjacent businesses. If it produces a reduction to required parking, a request (with all supporting applications, plans, etc.) for such must be filed to run concurrently with this request: Staff may not support any reduction of required parking for such businesses. 11/29/2005 12/21/05 - WW Not Met Pool. equipment must be screened from view from adjacent property per Code requirements. Indicate screening materials and height. 11/29/05 - WW Since the existing pool and spa are being demolished, unclear where the pool equipment is to be located. Show /revise. 11/29/2005 12/21/05 - WW Not Met Still unclear as to purpose for this storage area, since it is accessed solely by a sidewalk from the public sidewalk and is not internal to the building and the people who potentially be using it. It appears as a rentable unit for warehousing (true or not ? ?). There has been no narrative or any explanatory information submitted as to this storage area. Provide the square footage for this storage room. Revise /advise. 11/29/05 - WW Sheet A -01.1 - Unclear as to need for "storage" room in the northwest corner of the building and whom this "storage" is to be used for. There is no sidewalk access provided to this room. Unclear why access cannot be located internally. North elevation on Sheet A -2.1 indicates double doors /windows to the east of the access door, but the floor plan doesn't indicate such doors /windows. Advise /revise. 11/30/2005 12/21/05 - WW Not Met COMMENT STILL APPLICABLE. 11/30/05 - WW Building elevation for the existing to remain overnight accommodation use (Sheet A -02) - Provide CaseConditons Print Date: 12/22/2005 Page 5 of 8 FLD2005 -07071 678 S GULFVIEW BLVD Zoning Condition Wayne Wells, AICP 727 - 562 -4504 a dimension line with the height of the building from BFE to the roof deck. Also dimension the height of the parapet from roof deck. 11/30/200* 12/21/05 - WW Not Met COMMENT IS STILL APPLICABLE. REVISE. 11/30/05 - WW Window and door locations are not coordinated between the floor plans and the building elevations. Coordinate /revise. 11/30/2005 12/21/05 - WW I Not Met Comment is still applicable. Narrative must include a description of this concierge accessory use. 11/30/05 - WW Unclear as to the request. In the "Description of Request" narrative (second sentence) "office" is mentioned as part of the mixed use proposal. However, in the response to Planning comment #23 in the 10/4/05 letter it is noted that the office is a "management office." Much like one of Planning's other comments, unclear as to the purpose of this "office" space shown on the plans. If it rentable nonresidential space, has it been calculated as part of the 3,350 square feet of nonresidential space or what? 111/30/2005 12/21/05 - WW Not Met COMMENTS FROM 11/30/05 BELOW ARE STILL APPLICABLE. In addition, place setback dimensions: 1) from the south property line to the "bay window" bumpout north of the adjacent Subway building; and 2) from the existing /proposed property line to all different points of the proposed building north of the adjacent strip retail bulding. 11/30/05 - WW Sheet C3.1 - Provide the setback dimensions for the following: a) Side (south) setback from the proposed lot line to the proposed pavement (north of existing adjacent retail building); b) Side (south) setback from the proposed lot line (corner of the existing adjacent retail building) to the corner of the proposed building; c) Side (west) setback to the patio deck (west of existing to remain overnight accommodation use building). 11/30/2005 12/21/05 - WW Not Met COMMENT IS STILL APPLICABLE. 11 /30/05 - WW Indicate on the building elevations (both buildings) the proposed color scheme for the entire building (indicate the proposed color names). Provide the proposed colors of-the awnings indicated on the north side of the proposed mix_ ed use building and on the east and west sides of the overnight accommodation use building. 12/21/200, Totally unclear as to what is happening on the northwest portion of the site. Prior submittals Not Met indicated'the existing parking area accessed from Walgreens, yet on the subject property, to remain. I have had comments regarding the relationship of proposed improvements on the subject property to those existing parking areas and sidewalks on the adjacent parcel and ensuring the plan is clear. Now ... Sheet C2.1 does not indicate any removal of the parking areas on the northwest side of the subject property, yet Sheets C3.1 and C4.1 seem to indicate that these parking areas and sidewalk are removed.... and.... Sheet 1-1.1 shows the installation of landscaping of this existing parking area on the northwest side. The plans need to: 1. if it is the intent to retain this parking area, the plans clearly need to reflect this; or 2. it it is the intent to remove this parking area, it MUST be demonstrated through gross floor area square footage calculations for all floor area on the adjacent parcel and parking calculations at the appropriate Code rates that ALL required parking for the adjacent parcel will still be provided. If ALL required parking for the adjacent parcel will not be provided, then an appropriate Parking CaseConditons Print Date: 12/22/2005 Page 6 of 8 • FLD2005 -07071 678 S GULFVIEW BLVD • Zoning Condition Wayne Wells, AICP 727 - 562 -4504 Study will be required to be submitted justifying the proposed reduction (a scoping meeting is required with Traffic Engineering and Planning prior to the start of such Parking Study). Additionally, an application to reduce the required parking for the adjacent parcel, with all appropriate application materials (application, site plans, building plans or photographs, etc.) and the application fee must be submitted. Planning has raised the concern regarding these parking areas and what this proposal is doing to them throughout the review of this project and is still concerned. 12/21/2005, _ Sheet C3.1 has gotten worse in regard to line weight for proposed structures. The "underground" Not Met retention vault has a wider and darker line weight, giving more visual weight to the viewer, than where the building lines are, thereby making the retention vault more important to the viewer than the building. There also has been additional building added to the west side of the new building. No where in any application material or any cover narrative has this been conveyed from prior submittals. No verbiage regarding "building line above" has been provided on this west side (versus the east side of the building). 12/21/2005 What is the purpose of the building addition to the west side of the new building, which only covers Not Met the parking that was previously surface parking spaces? Since this new building addition is west of the ramp from Bayway Blvd. to the second floor, what will the second floor be used for (it is assumed to have a roof /floor on the second floor and not just vertical walls with the parking on the ground floor open to the sky)? 12/21/2005 Indicate on Sheet C3.1 that the dumpster enclosure will be constructed of masonry block, Not Met stuccoed like the building and will be painted "soft apricot" in color. Indicate the material for the gates, as well as the color the gates will be. 12/21/2005 Sheet C1.1 - Revise the Site Data table for parking calculations, as the required amount of Not Met parking for offices is four spaces /1,000 square feet (17 spaces) and it should be shown that two spaces per unit are being provided (54 spaces). The total required parking is 75 spaces. You indicate there are 78 spaces being provided, yet I count 80 spaces. Count the spaces again and revise the provided number as necessary. Ensure any narrative or response to criteria reflects the revised required amount of parking. 12/21/2005_ Narrative in the second paragraph of the "Description of Request" states that the existing four -foot Not Met wide sidewalk behind the retail will be widened to five -foot wide, yet the plans do not indicate such. Revise either the narrative or the drawings. 12/21/2005 Plans are not clear as to where the four parking spaces for the overnight accommodation use are Not Met Y , located (indicate on Sheet C3.1). Additionally, since all parking is now being provided in the new building, THERE IS STILL NO SIDEWALK ACCESS INDICATED FROM THE NEW BUILDING TO THE OLD BUILDING FOR THESE OVERNIGHT ACCOMMODATION GUESTS. BUILDING PLANS FOR THE OVERNIGHT ACCOMMODATION USE BUILDING INDICATES TWO DOORS ON THE NORTH SIDE WITHOUT ANY SIDEWALK ACCESS. REVISE. 12/21/200 Plans are confusing as to the existing overnight accommodation use building and what the Not Met proposed site plan is depicting. Sheet C2.1 indicates certain pavers and concrete to be removed. Sheet C3.1 still indicates brick pavers and concrete in areas that C2.1 showed to be removed. Sheet L1.1 doesn't indicate what landscape treatments are being proposed in all these areas where the pavers and concrete are being removed. Please revise and coordinate these plans. 12/21/2005 The changes to the lot area and the square footage of nonresidential floor area now only Not Met produces a maximum of 26 dwelling units (in addition to the 4,294 sf of offices and the four overnight accommodation units), per the following mixed use calculation: Mixed Use Calculation for Playa Del Sol Property - 678 South Gulfview Boulevard A. Property is zoned Tourist District (maximum FAR = 1.0 and maximum density = 30 du /acre) CaseConditons Print Date: 12/22/2005 Page 7 of 8 • FLD2005 -07071 678 S GULFVIEW BLVD s Zoning Condition Wayne Wells, AICP 727- 562 -4504 1. Permitted FAR aeaeaeaeaewwaeaeaeaeaeaeaeaeaeaeaea eaeaeae1.0 2. Multiply #A1 by bldg sq. ftg. of retail & restaurant proposedee ... ae..x 4,294 sf 3. Lot area required to support #A2 in the building aeaeaeeec-eae..ae..= 4,294 sf 4. Lot area aeaeaeaeaeaearaeaeaeaea r aeaeaeaeaeaeaeaeaea : aear 47,215 sf 5. Subtract the lot area required to support non - residential use in the building ( #A3) aeaeaeaeaeaeaeaeaeaeae..- 4,294,sf 6. Lot area (sf) to calculate the maximum number of dwelling units ea.= 42,921 sf 7. Divide #A6 a?aeaeaeaeaeaeaeaeaeaeaeaeaeaeaeaeaeaeaea?aeae 42,921 sf 8. Land area in an acre aeaeaeaeaeaea raeaeaeaeaeaeaeaeaeaeaeae= 43,560 sf 9. Lot acreage for residential portionaearararaeaea:.aea ; a r aawce..= 0.985 acres 10. Multiply #A9 aeaeaeaeaea; aeaeaeaeaeaeaeaea?aeaeaeaea :ae.. 0.985 acres 11. Maximum density 30 du /acre 12. Maximum number of dwelling units permitted ara:aeaeaaa:ae... = 29 du B. Maximum Development Potential for Property 1. Existing Overnight Accommodation Rooms /Units (OVA) to remainae 4 rooms 2. Conversion of OVA in #131 to dwelling units (40/30 rule) ar.araeaeae 3 du 3. Maximum number of dwelling units ( #Al2)aeae.aeaeaeaeaearae. 29 du 4. Subtract converted OVA to remain ( #62) from #63aeaearaeaeaea r ae3 du 5. Maximum # of dwelling unitseeaeaeaea:aeaea r aeaeaeaeaeae.ae = 26 du 12/21/20 Due to an excess of parking proposed and the lack of landscaping, remove the northernmost Not Met parallel parking space in the northwest corner of the proposed building. Install landscaping to south of trash staging area for screening of parking. 12/21/20Q� Sheet C3.1 - Put back on the plan the existing and proposed property lines, with appropriate Not Met notations with regard to such, between the strip commercial building and the proposed building. 12/21/2005 While I have been told there will be a dumpster for Walgreens on this property, no where does it Not Met state that the square area over in the southwest corner of the proposed buidling that such is a dumpster enclosure or trash room. This is now part of the proposed building and the building plans and elevations (south and west) do not reflect this dumpster enclosure or trash room. It is also noted "storage" without any information as to what this is. Storage should be screened from view. Reflect such in the building plans and elevations. Additionally, since this area is adjacent to parking spaces, it is totally unclear how any dumpster could be wheeled out of this area to the trash staging area. Finally, if this is for Walgreens, how do Walgreen personnel access such enclosure /room, since there is no walkway /sidewalk access nor any doorways providing such access. Revise all appropriate site, building and elevation drawings. 12/21/2005 Add Sheet A- 01.1A, much like Sheet A -01.2A has been added, showing the western building Not Met extension for the ground floor. Print Date: 12/22/2005 Page 8 of 8 CaseConditons y "� • Page 1 of 2 Wells, Wayne From: Rice, Scott Sent: Wednesday, December 21, 2005 8:23 AM To: 'FOWLERARCH @aol.com' Cc: WCN531 @ aol.com; renee @northsideengineering.com; Elbo, Bennett; Wells, Wayne Subject: RE: 678 S. Gulfview The following is the Email I sent to Wayne Wells after review of the resubmittal with Traffic Operations: Wayne, The letter and narrative dated 12/15/05 for the subject application have been reviewed with Traffic Operations. Comment #3 - The response regarding sight triangles is acceptable except at the two adjacent driveways as noted below. Comment #4 - The two driveways are in conflict with Sections 3 -102 and 3- 1402.B. of the Community Development Code and are not acceptable. With the proposed arrangement, additional conflict points are created in the public right -of way. Also, full sight distances do not exist between motorists using the two adjacent driveways. As this is new construction, creating these conflicts within the public right -of -way is not warranted. A simple solution is to connect the two areas of first floor parking through the center of the building and eliminating the westernmost driveway on Bayway. Comment #5 - Redesign to address Comment #4 may resolve this issue, however, with the maneuvers necessary to use these parallel parking spaces occurring near the throat of the driveway, these spaces have the potential to affect the public right -of way and are not acceptable. Since this is new construction, our thoughts were that the design could be modified such that first floor parking be accessed by a driveway from Parkway and second floor parking be accessed via a ramp from Bayway. D. Scott Rice Land Deve% Engr. Manager 727 - 562 -4781 scott.rice@MyClearwater.com - - - -- Original Message---- - From: FOWLERARCH @aol.com [ma i Ito: FOWLERARCH @aol.com] Sent: Tuesday, December 20, 2005 3:39 PM To: Rice, Scott Cc: WCN531 @aol.com; renee @northsideengineering.com Subject: 678 S. Gulview Scott, The folks at Northside tell me that you might have a solution for the driveways at the above referenced 12/21/2005 Page 2 of 2 project. Please give me a call, or email your thoughts... thanks. Steve Fowler 449 -2021 12/21/2005 Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Tuesday, December 20, 2005 10:40 AM To: Doreen Williams (E -mail) Cc: Renee Ruggiero (E -mail) Subject: FW: FLD2005 -07071 - 678 S Gulfview Need to address prior to January 11, 2006. - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Rice, Scott Sent: Tuesday, December 20, 2005 10:04 AM To: Wells, Wayne Cc: Elbo, Bennett Subject: RE: FLD2005 -07071 - 678 S Gulfview Wayne, 9 The letter and narrative dated 12/15/05 for the subject application have been reviewed with Traffic Operations. Comment #3 - The response regarding sight triangles is acceptable except at the two adjacent driveways as noted below. Comment #4 - The two driveways are in conflict with Sections 3 -102 and 3- 1402.13. of the Community Development Code and are not acceptable. With the proposed arrangement, additional conflict points are created in the public right -of way. Also, full sight distances do not exist between motorists using the two adjacent driveways. As this is new construction, creating these conflicts within the public right -of -way is not warranted. A simple solution is to connect the two areas of first floor parking through the center of the building and eliminating the westernmost driveway on Bayway. Comment #5 - Redesign to address. Comment #4 may resolve this issue, however, with the maneuvers necessary to use these parallel parking spaces occurring near the throat of the driveway, these spaces have the potential to affect the public right -of way and are not acceptable. D. Scott Rice Land Devel. Engr. Manager 727 - 562 -4781 scott.rice @MyClearwater.com - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Rice, Scott Sent: Wednesday, December 14, 2005 11:07 AM To: Wells, Wayne Cc: Elbo, Bennett Subject: FLD2005 -07071 - 678 S Gulfview Wayne, There are unresolved traffic issues on this case: TRAFFIC COMMENTS 3. Objects inside sight distance triangles must not exceed the City's vertical height limitations. (City's Community Development Code, Section 3 -904) 12/14/05 - OBJECTS EXIST WITHIN SIGHT TRIANGLES. WHAT PROVISIONS WILL BE MADE TO PROVIDE FOR PEDESTRIAN AND VEHICULAR SAFETY? 4. The two driveways along N. Bayway Blvd. do not meet the City's 125' minimum driveway separation for access management (Community Development Code Section 3- 102.). 12/14/05 - NOT MET 5. Demonstrate how a parked motorist can exit from the parallel parking spaces located along the west side of the westernmost driveway. 12/14/05 - NOT MET D. Scott Rice Land DeveL Engr. Manager 727 -562 -4781 scott.rice@MyClearwater.com Question........ • Page 1 of 1 Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Monday, December 19, 2005 2:09 PM To: 'Renee Ruggiero' Cc: Doreen Williams (E- mail); Watkins, Sherry Subject: RE: Question........ Renee - Regarding the cases that were on the December 8, 2005, DRC agenda, I am still working on the 678 S. Gulfview Blvd. case. Regarding 150 Brightwater Drive, I will fax over the Zoning Conditions still outstanding. You need to deal with the comments marked with an asterisk *, as I have added in comments regarding your resubmission. Looking at the comments, you need to address the comments and revise the submittal documents (narrative or site /building plans), but they are not comments that would keep this case off of the agenda. If possible, I would like to see revised application materials submitted by 2:00 pm on Wednesday, December 28, 2005. 1 need to send this agenda over to the City Clerk by the end of today. However, Fire Department _ comments. which I have sent to you, still need to be addressed rior to scheduling this case, as well as the case at 678 S Gulfview Blvd (sent to Doreen) for the CDB. You need to work this out with Fire. Wayne - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Renee Ruggiero [mailto :Renee @northsideengineering.com] Sent: Monday, December 19, 2005 8:50 AM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: Question........ Wayne - good Morning : ) I believe I answered all issues relating to my cases last week, shy of the North Somerset issues with fire, Have I addressed everything you need to move forward ? I sent over acceptance letters for conditions of approval, anything else out there I am forgetting about for you? Hope you had a great week -end Renee Ruggiero, Project Planner Northside Engineering Services, Inc. T- 727 - 443 -2869 F- 727 - 446 -8036 12/19/2005 0 0 Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Friday, December 16, 2005 8:21 AM To: Doreen Williams (E -mail) Cc: Renee Ruggiero (E -mail) Subject: FLD2005- 07071, 678 S Gulfview Blvd Doreen - Fire Department has reviewed the resubmission and the following comments are still not met that need to be addressed ASAP: Provide Fire Flow Calculations / Water Study by a FIRE PROTECTION ENGINEER to assure an adequate water supply is available and to determine if any upgrades are required by the developer due to the impact of this project. Calculations / Water Study due PRIOR TO CDB. 12/15/2005 Water Flow Calculations Insufficient. Calculations Must meet NFPA 1142 to include ANNEX H Wayne Northside • CIVIL • LAND PLANNING • 5_,,Me" Sm, Ise. ENVIRONMENTAL • �� TRANSPORTATION • LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL Date: December 16, 2005 To: Wayne Wells, Planner III City of Clearwater Planning Department 100 S. Myrtle Ave, #210 Clearwater, FL 33756 Reference: Playa Del Sol / 678 S. Gulfview Blvd NES Proj# 534/554 We Transmit: Enclosed Under Separate Cover Mail UPS Overnight Pick -Up X Hand Delivered Per Your Request For Your Review & Comment X For Your Use For Your Approval For Your Files For Your Information X Originals X_ Prints Addendum Shop drawings Specifications Applications Floppy Disk Please contact us at (727) 443 -2869 should you have any questions or comments. Copies To: FILE N. Pelzer D. Williams 601 CLEVELAND STREET, SUITE 930 CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33755 NESADMIN @MINDSPRIN6.COM NE5TECHQMINDSPRIN6.COM 727 • 443 • 2869 FAX 727 • 446 • 8036 0MG1W RECEV*D DEC 16 2005 pEpARDAENT p►A V OF C &.WATER Copies Date Description 15 Sheets C3.1, 1 signed and sealed Please contact us at (727) 443 -2869 should you have any questions or comments. Copies To: FILE N. Pelzer D. Williams 601 CLEVELAND STREET, SUITE 930 CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33755 NESADMIN @MINDSPRIN6.COM NE5TECHQMINDSPRIN6.COM 727 • 443 • 2869 FAX 727 • 446 • 8036 0MG1W RECEV*D DEC 16 2005 pEpARDAENT p►A V OF C &.WATER Horthside December 15, 2005 Mr. Wayne Wells Planner City of Clearwater Planning Department 100 S. Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, FL 33756 RE: FLD2005 -07071 - 678 S Gulfview DRC Response Dear Mr. Wells: CIVIL 0 LAND PLANNING • ENVIRONMENTAL • TRANSPORTATION • Listed below are our additional responses to the Development Review meeting held on December 8, 2005. Traffic Engineering 3. Stop bars have been provided at each exit with pavement markings and the plan has been revised to also provide "Caution Pedestrian Crossing" signs. Please also see the attached responses provided by the architect to this item. 4. Please see the attached responses provided by the architect. 5. Please see revised sheet C3.1, which provides the turning template for maneuverability. If there are any additional comments or concerns, please contact our office. ely, Renee Ruggiero Project Planner ORIGINAL RECEIVED DEC 16 2005 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER 601 CLEVELAND STREET, SUITE 930 CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33755 N ESADMI N @MI N DS PRI NG.COM NESTECH @MINDSPRING.COM Page 1 of 1 727 • 443 • 2869 FAX 727 • 446 • 8036 0 0 FOWLER ASSOCIATES ARCHITECTS, INC. 1 421 COURT STREET, SUITE D CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 449.2021 FAX 447.5339 Date: 15 December 2005 The two driveways along N. Bayway Blvd. are positioned so that only the residents of the project will be permitted access to the elevated parking. It is the intent of the project developers that this resident only access would provide a secure parking area for at least one of the resident's automobiles and that the amount of vehicle trips generated from this area will not be in conflict with the resident overflow and office patrons. In addition, the residential trips will be generally at a different time of the day, therefore lessening any potential conflict of adjacent drives. All service traffic will be generated at the easterly drive onto Bayway Dr. and will not be in conflict with the residential trips. Vision Triangle: The Building location on Bayway Blvd. is over 14' from the property line and a pedestrian warning sign will be installed before the stop bar. The building location on Parkway Drive is over 10' from the property line and this drive too, will be provided with the proper pedestrian warning signs. ORIGINAL RECEIVED DEC 16 2005 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER Horthside CIVIL LAND PLANNING • ,,,�;, ENVIRONMENTAL l • �u' smuaa loco TRANSPORTATION • December 12, 2005 Mr. Wayne Wells Planner City of Clearwater Planning Department 100 S. Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, FL 33756 RE: FLD2005 -07071 — 678 S. Gulfview Blvd DRC Response Dear Mr. Wells: Listed below are our responses to the Development Review meeting held on December 8, 2005. General Engineering 1. See note on sheet C4.1. 2. _See note on sheet C4.1. 3. Existing sanitary sewer to remain and be maintained by owner. 4. See water and sewer service for `Building A' on utility plan C4.1. To be addressed prior to building permits: 1. Gate valves are shown on sheet C4.1. Prior to CO: 1. Acknowledged. ORIGINAL. RECEIVED Environmental 1. See sheet C4.1. DEC 13 1005 Fire PLANNING DEPARTMENT 1. Acknowledged. CITY OF CLEARWATER 2. Three story existing building to be sprinklered. Land Resources 1. Acknowledged. 2. Acknowledged. 3. Tree inventory and survey has been updated. 4. All trees and canopies are shown on all Civil and Landscape plans. Landscaping 1. All trees have been shown on plans and are indicated as to whether they are being . retained /preserved or being removed. 2. Sheet L1.1 Note #8 has been revised. 3. Sheet L1.1 has been revised. 601 C L E V E 4 l'A &M?Eli, W1n13L01.1 designate all edges of pavement, curbing and wheel stops. CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33755 NESADMIN @MIND5PRIN6.COM NESTECH ®MIND5PRIN6.COM Page 1 of 727 • 443 • 2869 FAX 727 • 446 • 8036 5. Sheet L.1 has been revised to show correct plant natural count. 6. Sheet L1.1 has been revised. 7. Site data table on sheet C 1.1 has been corrected. Parks and Recreation 1. Acknowledged. Stormwater 1. Sheet C4.1 currently shows downspouts and how runoff will be handled. Prior to the issuance of a building permit: 1. Acknowledged. 2. See sheet C4.1. Traffic Engineering 1. 8'2" clearance is met, see Architectural plans. 2. Parking spaces under ramps will meet this requirement. 3. Acknowledged. 4. Two -way driveway along N. Bayway Boulevard has been addressed with Engineering. 5. Spaces have been moved. Planning 1. All interior landscaping has been crosshatched. 2. See architectural plans for mechanical unit location and screening material. 3. See attached photos of existing signage already supplied. Location of proposed sign has been indicated. 4. Comprehensive Infill Criteria #1 has been revised. 5. No longer a restaurant on the site. 6. Comprehensive Infill Criteria #1 has been revised. 7. A parking study is no longer required. We have increased the parking and have an overage due to no longer having a restaurant or retail space. Spaces have been converted to office. 8. Encroachment has been eliminated. 9. Parking spaces under ramp has been revised. 10. Management office is for condo concierge service. ORIGINAL 11. Acknowledged. RECEIVED 12. Acknowledged. 13. Acknowledged. DEC 13 2005 14. Acknowledged. 15. All heights are from BFE & are shown on sheet C 1.1. PLANNING DEPARTMENT 16. Acknowledged. CITY OF CLEARWATER 17. Acknowledged. 18. Acknowledged. 19. Acknowledged. 20. Parking spaces currently at Walgreen's will not be used. All parking will be retained on site. 21. Acknowledged. 22. General Applicability Criteria #4 has been revised. 23. Comprehensive Infill Criteria #3 has been revised. 24. Required parking for adjoining businesses is no longer applicable. 25. Sheets have been revised to show building A's access to parking. See pedestrian route. 26. See location of pool equipment on C3.1. 27. See. revised sheet C3.1. Page 2 of 3 28. See Architectural plans. 29. Concrete is to be removed. 30. No longer applicable due to revised building. See Architectural and Civil plans. 31. See Architectural plans. 32. See Architectural plans. 33. Sheet C1.1 has been corrected. 34. See Architectural plans. 35. See Architectural plans. 36. All dimensions to existing are noted on sheet C3.1. 37. Description request has been revised. 38. Description request has been revised. 39. See C3.1 for all dimensions. 40. Civil and Architectural plans have been coordinated. 41. Color rendering for building A is included. 42. See Architectural plans. If there are any additional comments or concerns, please contact our office. Sincerely, D en A. Williams Project Director Page 3 of 3 ORIGINAL RECEIVED DEC 13 2005 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER Northside • CIVIL • LAND PLANNING • 15"4"!ll�l� SMuad loco ENVIRONMENTAL • � %�''' TRANSPORTATION • LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL Date: December 13, 2005 15 To: Sherry L. Watkins, Administrative Analyst ORIGINAL RECEIVED 15 City of Clearwater Planning Department 15 Surveys, 1 Signed And Sealed 100 S. Myrtle Ave, #210 DEC 13 2005 15 Clearwater, FL 33756 15 Tree Inventory & Report 15 PLANNING DEPARTMENT Reference: Playa :Del Sol % FLD2005- 07071 CITY OF CLEARWATER NES Proj# 0554 8.5 X 11" Colored Renderings We Transmit: 8.5 X 11" Building Elevations X Originals Color chip attached to Original Arc. Drawing 15 X_ Prints X Enclosed Under Separate Cover Addendum Mail UPS Overnight Shop drawings Pick -Up X Hand Delivered Specifications Applications Floppy Disk 1 Comments Letter 15 Flex Development Application (Comp. Infill) 15 Letter of Authorization & Affidavits 15 Warranty Deeds 15 Surveys, 1 Signed And Sealed 15 Easements And Vacations (8 Total, Signed And Sealed 15 Stormwater Report & Narrative (1 Signed And Sealed) 15 Tree Inventory & Report 15 Civil & Landscape Drawings (5 Sheets), 1 Signed And Sealed. 15 8.5" X 11 " Civil Site Plan 15 8.5" X 11" Colored Landscape Plan 15 8.5 X 11" Colored Renderings 15 8.5 X 11" Building Elevations 1 Color chip attached to Original Arc. Drawing 15 24 X 36 Architectural Drawings Please contact us at (727) 443 -2869 should you have any questions or comments. Copies To: FILE By: e0s, N.PELZER A.HAINES reen A. Williams, Project Director 601 CLEVELAND STREET, SUITE 930 CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33755 NESADMIN @MINDSPRIN6.COM NESTECH@MINDSPRIN6.COM 727 • 443 • 2869 FAX 727 • 446 • 8036 0 Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Wednesday, December 07, 2005 6:42 PM To: Doreen Williams (E -mail) Subject: FLD2005- 07071, 678 S. Gulfview Blvd. Doreen - • Attached are the draft DRC comments for the above referenced case, scheduled for review at 2:20 pm tomorrow. I apologize for not sending the draft comments earlier (too many projects, too little time). These comments are slightly different for this case than that which was part of the entire DRC action agenda Sherry sent to Angel earlier today. Wayne draft 12.8.05 dre action agend... Norths e • LAND PLANNINI6 • ENV[ RON MENTAL • sqia" smka loco TRANSPORTATION • LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL Date: October 17, 2005 To: Mr. Wayne Wells, Planner III Planning Department 100S . Myrtle Ave #210 Clearwater, FL 33755 Reference: Playa Del Sol Building A - 678 S. Gulfview Blvd NES Proj# 554 We Transmit: Enclosed Mail Pick -Up Per Your Request X For Your Use For Your Files Under Separate Cover UPS Overnight X Hand Delivered For Your Review & Comment For Your Approval For Your Information Originals X Prints Addendum Shop drawings Specifications Applications Floppy Disk Please contact us at (727) 443 -2869 should you have any questions or comments. r ) By' oreen A. Williams, Project Director RECEIVED Copies To: FILE N. Pelzer A. Haines OCT 17 2005 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER 601 CLEVELAND STREET, SUITE 930 CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33755 ORIGINAL NESADMIN @MINDSPRIN6.COM NESTECH @MINDSPRING..COM 727 • 443 • 2869 FAX 727 • 446 • 8036 Copies Date Description 15 Architectural Plan, Sheet A -02 Please contact us at (727) 443 -2869 should you have any questions or comments. r ) By' oreen A. Williams, Project Director RECEIVED Copies To: FILE N. Pelzer A. Haines OCT 17 2005 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER 601 CLEVELAND STREET, SUITE 930 CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33755 ORIGINAL NESADMIN @MINDSPRIN6.COM NESTECH @MINDSPRING..COM 727 • 443 • 2869 FAX 727 • 446 • 8036 17-1 Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Monday, October 10, 2005 6:13 PM To: Doreen Williams (E -mail) Subject: FLD2005- 07071, 678 South Gulfview Blvd. Doreen - • With Angel's help this afternoon, the wayward architectural plans (large scale and reduced size) for the proposed new mixed use building were located. Wayne • Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Saturday, October 08, 2005 10:55 AM To: Doreen Williams (E -mail) Cc: Delk, Michael; Clayton, Gina; Thompson, Neil Subject: FLD2005- 07071, 678 South Gulfview Blvd. Doreen - • Revised plans were resubmitted on October 6, 2005, for the above reference case. These revised civil and landscape plans now incorporate the overnight accommodation building, previously submitted under Case FLD2005 -09092 (withdrawn on October 4, 2005). Architectural plans for neither the new mixed use building or the existing overnight accommodation building were resubmitted, including reduced (8.5'x11 ") copies. Please submit these architectural drawings. Please be aware that, while these plans were resubmitted on October 6, 2005, this case was found insufficient to move forward at the September 29, 2005, DRC meeting. As previously noted, resubmittal of revised civil, landscaping and architectural drawings prior to, or by noon on, November 2, 2005, will cause this case to be scheduled for review by the DRC on December 8, 2005. Wayne Northside S"M" sm?& 1008 October 4, 2005 Mr. Wayne Wells Planner III City of Clearwater 100 S. Myrtle Avenue ,,: Clearwater, FL 3'3755 RE: FLD2005 -07071 678 S. Gulfview Blvd. Dear Mr. Wells: • CIVIL • LAND PLANNING • ENVIRONMENTAL 0 TRANSPORTATION • ORIGNAL Listed below are;our responses to the September 29, 2005 Development Review Agenda comments. - General Engineering 1. F.D.C. will be installed at least 15' from the face of the building. See Sheet C3.1. 2. F.D.C. will be located no more than 40' from a fire hydrant. See Sheet C3.1. 3. Address change is no longer applicable at this time. Both projects are being submitted at one and this will be addressed prior to building permit. 4. All unused drive aprons and/or parking surfaces will be removed at applicant's expense. R.O.W.'s will be restored with new sidewalk and sod. See Note on Sheet C3.1. 5. Directional arrows have been corrected on 1 st floor of the garage. 6. All sanitary sewer has been shown on site. This goes away since the site will be as one. 7. We are trying to resolve the existing Stormwater system running through the site. We are working with engineering. This will be resolved prior to building permit. Prior to Building Permit: 1. All fire hydrant assemblies installed greater than 10' from water main will be constructed with ductile iron pipe. See Note on Sheet C3.1 2. All new concrete driveway aprons constructed within the ROW will be a minimum 6" thick fibrous concrete, etc., See Note on Sheet C3.1. 3. Sidewalks and sidewalk ramps adjacent to or a part of the project shall be designed & constructed per Index #109 and D.O.T. Index #304. See Note on Sheet C3.1. 4. It is acknowledged that a ROW permit is required for all work within the ROW. 601 CLEVELAND STREET, SUITE 930 CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33755 NESADMIN @MINDSPRIN6.COM NESTECH@MINDSPRIN6.COM 727 • 443 • 2869 FAX 727 • 446 • 8036 D kM V/ kii OCT 0 6 2005 • Mr. Wayne Wells October 4, 2005 Page Two ORIGINAL Environmental 1. The use of an underground vault in lieu of a surface treatment pond is due to the fact the site is nearly 100% impervious with the exception of 18' of open space on the western property line. This area is capable of generating approximately .990 c.f of retention volume. The required volume quality and quantity attenuation volume is approximately 7,400 c.f. 2. See skimmer detail on Sheet C3.1 for treatment system to capture auto pollutants. 3. See vault details and cross - section on Sheet C3.1. 4. See attached vault maintenance schedule attached herewith. Fire 1. Acknowledged. 2. Acknowledged 3. Minimum 30' turning radii has been provided along Bayway. See Sheet C2.1. 4. Retention Vault will be able to withstand 80,000 lbs. Land Resources 1. All trees with canopies have been shown on all civil and landscape plans. 2. Trees 1, 2, 6, 7 and 8 will be preserved. Utilities will be relocated as to not be under canopies. See Sheet C3.1. 3. Oak trees to the east of the proposed parking lot will be preserved. 4. Tree preservation plan and inventory has been provided. LandscaninQ 1. See revised Sheets C2.1, CM and L1.1 for all edges of pavement for open parking areas. Wheel stops have been added. 2. Foundation landscaping is being complied with. See Sheet Ll.l. 3. Note #8 on Sheet L1.1 has been revised. 4. All existing trees have been located on civil and landscape plans indicating removal or preserving. 5. Sheet L1.1 has been revised to comply with Section 3- 1202.B.1. 6. Landscape t able on Sheet L1.1 has been corrected. Parks and Recreation 1. It is acknowledged that open space /recreation impact fees will be paid prior to building permit or final plat, whichever occurs first. D �d ElOCT 0 6 2005 PLANNING & 0E VFd.OPfAFEINN i SVCS 1C Mr. Wayne Wells OCT 0 6 20m ORIGINAL October 4, 2005{ Page Three plAHNING DEVE 4.f)Pt,4 o Stormwater 1. The vault will discharge into the inlets located on the southeast corner of the intersection of North Bayway Blvd. and Parkway Drive. See revised Sheet C33.1. SWFW'VM permit will be issued prior to building permit. Solid Waste 1. Trash rooms have been enlarged to hold 27 residential units and 4 overnight accommodation units. Traffic Engineering 1. Handicap space has been relocated on the first floor. 2. Garage height clearance does not meet 8'2 ", we have located the handicap space outside and this has been approved through traffic. 3. Parking garage vertical clear height meets 7. 4. A variance has been requested along Parkway Blvd. for a portion of the stairs to be located in the sight visibility triangle. 5. See Sheet C2.1 for revised driveway along N. Bayway Blvd. 6. Parallel spaces have been removed. 7. All parking spaces and drive aisles have been dimensioned on the architectural plans. Planning 1. The entire parking lot will not be terminated. Please see attached 8.5x11 sketch. 2. See revised Sheet C2.1 showing all dimensions to everything we can possible put a dimension to. 3. All plans have the same address "678 S. Bayway Blvd." 4. Per Floor square footages has been included. 5. All off -site sight visibility triangles are shown on Sheets C2.1 and Ll.1. 6. `` All outdoor lighting fixtures have been shown on C2.1. 7. Sheet C1.1 has been revised to show the correct building height as well as the architectural drawings. 8. FAR has been provided for retail and restaurant. See Sheet C 1.1. 9. A photo of the existing signage is included herewith. Sign will be brought up to code in compliance with City of Clearwater sign program. 10. All interior landscaping has been shaded or cross - hatched. 11. The roof top a/c units will be screened by parapets that will be in keeping with the overall architectural character of the project. See architectural plans. 12. Building A will be brought up to code, new landscaping and a facelift. 13. See attached survey for legal description. 14. Sheet C 1.1 has been revised to reflect correct density. 15. Sheet C1.1 has been revised to show correct parking calculations. 16. Parking demand study is currently being done by Gulf Coast Consulting and will be hand delivered upon completion Mr. Wayne Wells QCT Q 20�� ORIGINAL October 4, 2005 Page Four 01 A,, mshlr: Q. !19:11;•3 f)PAAFNTgVrS Plannin-e continued 17. Sheet C1.1 has been corrected under "project site ". 18. Sheet C1.1 has been revised to show the correct building height. 19. Sheet C 1.1 has been revised to show correct density. 20. Sidewalk entrances have been revised to the retail, restaurant and lobby. 21. The four 90 degree parking spaces have been corrected as to not encroach into easement. 22. See revised architectural drawings regarding ramp. 23. Office will be used for the management office. 24. It is acknowledged that ground floor must be floodproofed. 25. Mixed use and overnight accommodations one site. Existing pool will be removed and new pool will be constructed under separate contract. 26. The two spaces given to the overnight accommodations will be remain on the Walgreens site (see attached agreement). Also two additional spaces will be provided on site for the additional two units. 27. The issue with the trash and dumpster staging area has been resolved. 28. Potential Condition acknowledged. 29. Potential Condition acknowledged. 30. Potential Condition acknowledged. 31. Potential Condition acknowledged. 32. Potential Condition acknowledged. 33. Potential Condition acknowledged. 34. Potential Condition acknowledged. 35. Potential Condition acknowledged. 36. Sheet A01.6 has bee revised to show correct unit numbers. 37. Page 1 of the application has been revised under "proposed use ". 38. Square footage on Page 1 of the application has been revised. 39. Description of request now has the correct spelling of `RAZE ". 40. Potential Condition acknowledged. 41. General Applicability Criteria #1 response has been revised. 42. General Applicability Criteria #4 response has been revised. 43. General Applicability Criteria #5 response has been revised. 44. General Applicability Criteria #6 response has been revised. 45. Comp. Infill Criteria #1 response has been revised. 46. Comp. Infill Criteria #4 response has been revised. 47. Comp. Infill Criteria #6 response has been revised. 48. Comp. Infill Criteria #8 response has been revised. 49. Comp. Infill Criteria #9 response has been revised. 50. Comp. Infill Criteria #10 response has been revised. 0 Mr. Wayne Wells October 4, 2005 OCT 0 6 2005 Page Five ORIGINAL (:Ill' (� WAT For purposes of this application, all the responses have been changed on the application since this site is currently being put back together as one site and not two separate sites. If any other additional information is needed, please feel free to call. Sincere Doreen A. Williams Project Director • • Page 1 of 1 Wells, Wayne From: Doreen Williams [ Doreen @northsideengineering.com] Sent: Friday, September 30, 2005 2:10 PM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: Playa Del Sol Hello - we would like.to make this into one project again. Please call me. Thanks Doreen El Doreen A. Williams Project Director Northside Engineering Services, Inc. 601 Cleveland Street, Suite 930 Clearwater, FL 33755 Phone: 727 - 443 -2869 / Fax: 446 -8036 / Cell: 235 -8474 Email: doreen northsideengineeriA.com 10/3/2005 0 0 Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2005 8:37 AM To: • Renee Ruggiero (E -mail) Subject: Draft DRC comments for 678 S. Gulfview Blvd (two cases) Renee - Attached are the Draft 9.29.05 DRC comments for the following cases: 1. FLD2005 -07071 (Mixed Use) 1:00 pm 2. FLD2005 -09092 (Overnight accommodations) 1:15 pm Wayne draft 9.29.05 dre draft 9.20.05 dre action agend... action agend... 0. 0 Page 1 of 1 Wells, Wayne From: Renee Ruggiero [ Renee @northsideengineering.com] Sent: Tuesday, September 13, 2005 11:00 AM To: Wells, Wayne Cc: Angel Haines Subject: Playa Del Sol Good Morning Wayne: I am posing the following points to hopefully gain your agreement that perhaps a parking study will not be required for the above project. The previous use consisted of 42 overnight accommodations and the site provided 41 parking spaces (39 on site with 2 spaces at the neighboring shopping plaza) The proposed development provides 41 spaces for the proposed 27 attached dwelling units - four spaces for the existing four overnight accommodations - 5 spaces for the 850 sq ft of retail space and 25 spaces to service the restaurant for a grand total of 75 proposed parking spaces. With the understanding that the unit owners will obviously frequent the restaurant and will require no additional spaces for their visits, together with the pedestrian environment of the Beach in general, the availability and use of the Beach Trolley and the proposed substantial improvements to the non - conforming parking situation it is our hope that a formal parking study will not be required. Please see the below information gathered to assist, please provide your thoughts and any comments you may have. The existing use based upon ITE Trip Generation provided the following information: Existing 42 Overnight accommodations w/ 206 Expected Daily Trips - 17 PM Peak - 8 PM In - 9 PM out Based upon the proposed development of 27 attached dwelling units, 850 sq ft of retail and 2,500 sq ft Quality Restaurant ITE Trip Generation provided the following: 460 Expected Daily Trips - 40 PM Peak - 26 PM In - 14 PM Out Thank you as always for your kind consideration and direction. Respectfully, Renee Ruggiero, Project Planner 9/13/2005 Clearwater September 08, 2005. Housh Ghovaee 601 Cleveland Street Suite 930 Clearwater, FI 33755 CITY OF CLEORWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE: (727) 562 -4567 FAX: (727) 562 -4576 W W W .MYCLEARW ATER. COM RE: FLD2005 -07071 -- 678 S GULFVIEW BLVD -- Letter of Completeness Dear Housh Ghovaee : The Planning Staff has entered your application into the Department's filing system and assigned the case number: FLD2005- 07071. After a preliminary review of the submitted documents, staff has determined that the application is Complete. The Development Review Committee (DRC) will review the application for sufficiency on September 29, 2005, in the Planning Department conference room - Room 216 - on the second floor of the Municipal Services Building. The building is located at 100 South Myrtle Avenue in downtown Clearwater. Please call Sherry Watkins, Administrative Analyst, at 727 -562 -4582 no earlier than one week prior to the meeting date for the approximate time that your case will be reviewed. You or your representative (as applicable) must be present to answer any questions that the DRC may have regarding your application. Additional comments may be generated by the DRC at the time of the meeting. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at 727 -562 -4504 or Wayne. Wells@myclearwater.com. Sincerely yours, Wayne ells, AICP Planner III Letter of Completeness - FLD2005 -07071 - 678 S GULFVIEW BLVD • Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Thursday, September 08, 2005 11:39 AM To: Doreen Williams (E -mail) Subject: Letters of Completeness Doreen - Attached are Letters of Completeness for the following cases: FLD2005- 07071, 678 S. Gulfview Blvd. FLD2005- 09092, 678 S. Gulfview Blvd. I will send the originals to you. Wayne letter of letter of repleteness 9.8.05.,mpleteness 9.8.05., ,Horthside CIVIL • LAND PLANNING • 15 "M uuy smaa lace ENVIRONMENTAL • ��' TRANSPORTATION • September 7, 2005 Mr. Wayne Wells Planner ,� p City of Clearwater Planning Department J�p' (�0� 7 ZQQS 100 S. Myrtle Avenue J I Clearwater, FL 33756 ':..By RE: FLD2005 -07071 — 678 Gulfview Blvd. — NES #534 Letter of Incompleteness Response Dear Mr. Wells: Listed below are our responses to the Letter of Incompleteness dated September 2, 2005. 1. Photographs are being provided as a part of this submittal. A plan is being developed to provide the existing building with a facelift. 2. Parking is being provided as follows and will be sufficient for the site and all uses: Shops - 850 s.f. at 5 per 1,000 = 5 spaces provided Restaurants — 2,500 s.f. at 10 per 1,000 = 25 spaces provided Residential - 27 units at 1.5 per unit = 41 spaces provided Four existing Overnight 1 per unit = 4 spaces provided Accommodations - 75 required spaces / 77 spaces provided 3. All setbacks have been provided on the plans as per your request. 4. The address of the property within the title block has been changed to reflect 678 South Gulfview Blvd. It is the developer's intention to work with Don Malone of the City's Engineering Department to provide the address of 681 North Bayway Blvd. for the new development. 5. A table has been provided as requested PER FLOOR on sheet C 1.1. 6. All visibility triangles have been added to plans as required. 7. The building will be removed and brought up to Code as requested and in concert with construction of the new development. 8. No outdoor lighting fixtures are requested at this time. 9. Building heights have been provided on the elevation drawings as per your request and have been added to the Site Data Table. 10. The Gross Floor Area and Floor Area Ratio on the Site Data Table as been revised to indicate the retail and restaurant floor area. 11. Curbing has been added as requested. 12. The Comprehensive Landscape Program application has been removed from the application packages as no landscape variances are being requested at this time. 13. A new monument style sign will be proposed and submitted by others at a later date. It is understood that any signs shall meet all required building codes. 601 CLEVELAND STREET, SUITE 930 CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33755 NESADMIN @MINDSPRING.COM N ESTECH @MI N DSPRI N6.COM 727 • 443 • 2869 FAX 727 • 446 • 8036 Page 1 of 2 �r Mr. Wayne Wells Page Two 14. No TDR's are proposed at this time. 15. A supplementary application addressing the building that will remain; containing the four overnight accommodations has been provided. 16. The application, Site Data Table, parking calculations, and Description of the Request have all been modified to provide corresponding information. 17. Shading and crosshatching have been added to the plan as requested. 18. Mechanical equipment will be roof mounted. 19. Assuming you were speaking of Building A, the foundation plantings have been added to the plan along the street as per your special request. Additionally, brick pavers in front of Building A will be removed. 20. Parking calculations for the restaurant square footage is being based upon 12 spaces per 1,000 square feet, it is our hope that this will be found to be sufficient. If there are any additional comments or concerns, please contact our office. ly, Renee Ruggiero Project Planner Page 2 of 2 41 'Clearwater September 02, 2005 Housh Ghovaee 601 Cleveland Street Suite 930 Clearwater, Fl 33755 CITY OF CLERRWATER r PLANNING DEPARTMENT MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE: (727) 562 -4567 FAX: (727) 562 -4576 WWW.MYCLEARWATER.COM RE: FLD2005 -07071 -- 678 S GULFVIEW BLVD -- Letter of Incompleteness Dear Housh Ghovaee : The Planning Staff has entered your application into the Department's filing system and assigned the case number: FLD2005- 07071. After a preliminary review of the submitted documents, staff has determined that the application is Incomplete with the following comments. 9/2/05 - WW If this building is going to be on a separate parcel, then the building elevations (if there are to be facade improvements proposed) or photographs of the existing building must be submitted with the additional Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project application. The other portions of the comments under 7/8/05 would still be applicable regarding site improvements. If this building is still going to be a part of the overall parcel and part of the Playa Del Sol application, then the comment below is still appropriate. 7/8/05 - WW Provide building elevations and floor plans for the overnight accommodation building (Building A). Elevations must indicate how this building is being modified to make it consistent with the new building. Note: Staff will .not support this request unles there are improvements to the site around this building, including removing existing encroachments onto this site and encroachment of this site's improvements onto adjacent property. This has been previously communicated to the architect. Make this site one cohesive site. 2. 9/2/05 - WW The comment below is still applicable. 7/8/05 - WW Note: Description of Request narrative indicates that the parking easement on this property on the north side is being terminated by this owner. There may be a Zoning Code issue with such termination, as this parking may be required parking for the adjoining businesses. Provide documentation that such parking is not required parking for these adjacent businesses. If it produces a reduction to required parking, a request (with all supporting applications, plans, etc.) for such must be filed to run concurrently with this request. Staff may riot support any reduction of required parking for such businesses. Letter of Incompleteness - FLD2005 -07071 - 678 S GULFVIEW BLVD LL CITY OF CLEXRWATER Clearwater PLANNING DEPARTMENT MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE: (727) 562 -4567 FAX: (727) 562 -4576 W W W .MYCLEARWATER. COM September 02, 2005 3. 9/2/05 - WW The building appears to be lined up with the property line along Parkway Drive at a 10 -foot setback, however, it appears that the building is not parallel with the property line along Bayway Blvd. but rather at a slight angle. A dimension of 12.8 feet is provided to a column closer to the ramp but the same 12.8 -foot dimension is also provided to the face of the building at the southeast corner, yet the colum does not meet a 10 feet setback from Bayway Blvd. at this southeast corner. An 11.6 -foot dimension has been provided on the south side, but to the existing property line (not the proposed property line, although both should be provided). Need to provide the dimension from the new corner of the proposed lot line (corner of the retail building) to the proposed Playa building (side setback). 7/8/05 - WW Provide on Sheet C2.1 dimensions to all structures, including the columns on the east adjacent to Parkway Drive, the columns adjacent to Bayway Blvd, the columns close to the pool, the pool deck, the existing Building A, pavement /pavers /deck/other structures around Building A, the trash staging area from the front property line, the existing pavement from the front property line in the northeast corner 4. 9/2/05 - WW Civil and architectural plans still differ on the address. If this is to be a separate parcel for Playa, a new address will need to be assigned. 7/9/05 - WW Revise address of project in title block on civil and architectural plans from 678 N. Bayway Blvd. to 678 S. Gulfview Blvd. 5. 9/2/05 & 7/9/05 - WW Provide on Sheet C 1.1 a table PER FLOOR of the square footage of nonresidential floor area, number of parking spaces, number of dwellings and number of overnight accommodation units, including the totals of all. 6. 9/2/05 - WW Provide on Sheets C2.1 and L1.1 the sight visibility triangles adjacent to the driveway (off -site) at the northWEST (my mistake) corner of the property on Bayway Blvd. 7/9/05 - WW Provide on Sheets C2.1 and L1.1 the sight visibility triangles at the intersection of Bayway Blvd and Parkway Drive and adjacent to the driveway (off -site) at the northeast corner of the property on Bayway Blvd. 7. 9/2/05 & 7/9/05 - WW Indicate /show on Sheet C3.1 the utilities to existing Building A (to remain) and whether any improvements are required (such as fire sprinklers and fire hydrant, due to being three story in height). 8. 9/2/05 & 7/9/05 - WW Show /indicate the location of all outdoor lighting fixtures. Letter of Incompleteness - FLD2005 -07071 - 678 S GULF VIEW BLVD LL * CITY OF CLEgRWATER Clearwater PLANNING DEPARTMENT MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING ' 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE: (727)562 -4567 FAX: (727) 562 -4576 W W W .MYCLEARWATER. COM September 02, 2005 9. 9/2/05 & 7/9/05 - WW Indicate on the building elevations the height of the building from BFE to the highest roof deck (not ceiling), as well as the height of the parapet from the roof deck of the highest roof deck. Ensure these heights are indicated in the site data table on Sheet C1.1. 10. 9/2/05 & 7/9/05 - WW Provide the proposed gross floor area and FAR in the site data table on Sheet C1.1 FOR ONLY THE RETAIL AND RESTAURANT FLOOR AREA (emphasis added this time). 11. 9/2/05 - WW Show on Sheets C2.1, C3.1 and L1.1 the edges of both driveways onto Bayway Blvd being curbed, as well as all edges of pavement for open parking areas, including the existing on the west side. 7/9/05 - WW Show on Sheets C2.1, C3.1 and L1.1 the edges of both driveways onto Bayway Blvd being curbed. 12. 9/2/05 - WW While a Comprehensive Landscape Program application has been submitted, it is unclear why. The site data table indicates the minimum interior landscape area is being provided. Is the foundation landscaping being provided as indicated below? 7/9/05 - WW Submit a Comprehensive Landscape Program application, as applicable, if the interior landscape area or foundation planting area requirements are not proposed to be met. Landscape associated with the Comprehensive Landscape Program shall exceed minimum Code requirements to offset the areas where minimum Code will not be met. 13. 9/2/05.& 7/9/05 - WW Show at least in concept all proposed freestanding and attached signs; showing on Sheets C2.1, C3.1 and L1.1 the location and setback from property lines of proposed freestanding signage and on the building elevations the location of proposed attached signage. Details may come later through the building permit review process or through the submission of a Comprehensive Sign Program application. Also address existing signage, which will be required to be brought into conformance with Code requirements (provide at least photographs of existing signage). Letter of Incompleteness - FLD2005 -07071 - 678 S GULMEW BLVD • Clearwater September 02, 2005 14. 9/2/05 WW CITY OF CLEqRWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE: (727) 562 -4567 FAX: (727) 562 -4576 W W W.MYCLEAR WATER. COM Does the application include TDRs or not? If not, revise the asterik * on the bottom of the site data table on Sheet C 1.1 and submit a letter withdrawing the TDRs. If yes, then submit new information. 7/9/05 - WW Application includes the Transfer of Development Rights (TDR) from 400 East Shore Drive (sending site) of four dwelling units to this receiving site. The sending site is presently developed with an operating overnight accommodation use of 38 rooms /units. Based on the current maximum density allowable of 40 rooms /units per acre and the site area of the sending site of 0.396 acre (17,250 square feet), the sending site can only support 15 rooms /units today. Therefore, the sending site is currently nonconforming to density. The sending site does not have any dwelling units to transfer to the subject, receiving site. Based on the mixed use calculation, a total of five dwelling units could be requested to be transferred to this site through the TDR process. Either need to reduce the proposed number of dwelling units allowable for this site or need to find dwelling units from other appropriate sending sites. Revise /correct. 15. It appears, based on the reduced land area of 42,615 square feet identified in the site data table on Sheet C1.1, that the western portion of the existing parcel that will have the four overnight accommodation units is being separated from the majority of the existing parcel. As such, this western portion of the existing parcel of 4,953 square feet that will have the four overnight accommodation units remaining will need to be requested as part of a separate and additional Flexible Development application (Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project) because 1) it will now be on a separate lot, 2) the proposed lot area is below that listed in Table 2 -803 for overnight accommodation uses and 3) a zero rear setback is proposed. As I have indicated in the past, improvements to this area with the four overnight accommodation units will be necessary. This application will need to track along to the same CDB agenda, because we cannot create a separate parcel not meeting Code requirements for lot area and setbacks through the approval of the Playa Del Sol project. Letter of Incompleteness - FLD2005 -07071 - 678 S GULFVIEW BLVD LL CITY OF CLEORWATER Clearwater PLANNING DEPARTMENT MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE: (727) 562 -4567 FAX: (727) 562 -4576 W W W. MYC LEAR W ATER. C OM September 02, 2005 16. Application is confusing as to what is requested: 1. Site data table on Sheet C1.1 under "density" indicates 27 attached dwellings, but then has an asterik which indicates "27 attached dwellings + 4 TDRs = 31 units ". Note: No amended request was resubmitted for four TDRs. 2. Parking calculations for residential equates to 31 dwellings. 3. Best I can tell from the building floor plans submitted is that there is 27 units. 4. Description of Request indicates 31 units. This Description equates the overnight accommodation units to dwelling units, which is inaccurate. It also inaccurately intimates the mixed use calculation for "transient units supports 27 units." This Description also indicates that the four overnight accommodation units will be in Building A, which is assumed to be on the subject property under consideration, yet they are on a separate "desired /proposed" parcel. This Description also indicates the number of units to be raised (should be razed) is 38, but does not differentiate between overnight accommodation (transient. units) or dwelling units. 5. The mixed use calculation submitted indicates 27 dwelling units with the 3350 square feet of retail and restaurant square footage. 17. Depict by shading or crosshatching all required parking lot interior landscaped areas and include the square footages of all areas being counted toward the interior landscaping. 18. Indicate the location of all outdoor mechanical units for both the Playa building and for the existing Building A (to remain). Indicate screening materials. 19. Per Section 3- 1202.E.2, foundation plantings shall be provided for 100% of a building facade with frontage along a street right of way, excluding space necessary for building ingress and egress, within a minimum five foot wide landscaped area composed of at least two accent trees (or palm equivalents) or three palms for every 40 linear feet of building facade and one shrub for every 20 square feet of required landscaped area. A minimum of 50% of the area shall contain shrubs with the remainder to be ground cover. Provide along the southern frontage of the existing Building A to remain. 20. Parking calculations in the site data table indicate only seven spaces per 1,000 square feet of restaurant GFA is being provided. This is a reduction from the required 15 spaces per 1,000 square feet of GFA. As such, a Parking Demand Study must be submitted. Prior to the submittal of this application, the methodology of such study shall be approved by the Community Development Coordinator and shall be in accordance with accepted traffic engineering principles. The findings of the study will be used in determining whether or not deviations to the parking standards are approved. Letter of Incompleteness - FLD2005 -07071 - 678 S GULFVIEW BLVD LL CITY OF CLEORWATER r" Clearwater PLANNING DEPARTMENT MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE: (727) 562 -4567 FAX: (727) 562 -4576 W W W.MYCLEARWATER. COM September 02, 2005 Section 4 -202 of the Community Development Code states that it an application is cieemea incomplete, the deficiencies of the application shall be specified by Staff. No further development review action shall be taken until the deficiencies are corrected and the application is deemed complete. Please resubmit by 9:00 am on Wednesday, September 7, 2005. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at 727 -562 -4504 or Wayne.Wells@myclearwater.com. Sincerely yours, Wayn Wells Planner III Letter of Incompleteness - FLD2005 -07071 - 678 S GULFVIEW BLVD 0 0 Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Friday, September 02, 2005 6:52 PM To: Doreen Williams (E -mail) Subject: FLD2005- 07071, 678 S. Gulfview Blvd. Doreen - Attached is a Letter of Incompleteness for the above referenced project. Disregard the first paragraph in the letter on the last page. You may pick it up the original Tuesday morning when you come over for other projects. Wayne M1' letter of completeness #2 9 Northside �ngixeartng. sacu�e� 9KC. i CIVIL • LAND PLANNING • ENVIRONMENTAL • TRANSPORTATION • ORIGINAL LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL Date: August 25, 2005 To: Sherry L. Watkins, Administrative Analyst City of Clearwater Planning Department 100 S. Myrtle Ave, #210 Clearwater, FL 33756 Reference: Playa Del Sol NES Proj# 0534 We Transmit: X Enclosed Under Separate Cover Mail UPS Overnight Pick -Up X Hand Delivered Descripti y AUG, 2 5 20U05 PY„ °I`c° X Originals X_ Prints Addendum Shop drawings Specifications X Applications Floppy Disk 15 Flex Development Application (Comp. In. fill) '15 Letter of Authorization & Affidavits 15 Warranty Deeds 15 Surveys (1 signed and sealed) 15 Stormwater Report & Narrative (1 signed and sealed 15 Tree Inventory and Surveys 15 Comprehensive Landscape Application 1'5 Civil & Landscape Drawings (4 sheets) 15 8.5" X 11 "Civil Site Plan 15 8.5" X 11" Colored Landscape Plan 15 8.5 X 11" Colored Renderings 15 8.5 X 11" Building Elevations 1 Color chip attached to Original Arc. Drawing 15 24 X 36 Architectural Drawings Please contact us at (727) 443 -2869 should you have any questions or comments. In Doreen A. Williams, Project Director 601 CLEVELAND STREET, SUITE 930 CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33755 NE5ADMIN @MINDSPRIN6.COM N ESTECHQMI NDSPRI N6.COM 727 • 443 - 2869 FAX 727 • 446 • 8036 Copies to: FILE N. Pelzer A. Haines 0 } Clearwater U July 09, 2005 Housh Ghovaee 601 Cleveland Street Suite 930 Clearwater, Fl 33755 CITY OF CLEtRWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE: (727) 562 -4567 FAX: (727) 562 -4576 WW W.MYCLEARWATER.COM RE: FLD2005 -07071 -- 678 S GULFVIEW BLVD -- Letter of Incompleteness Dear Housh Ghovaee : The Planning Staff has entered your application into the Department's filing system and assigned the case number: FLD2005- 07071. After a preliminary review of the submitted documents, staff has determined that the application is Incomplete with the following comments. i1. Based on the site plan and floor plans submitted, I count 91 parking spaces provided and 32 dwellings proposed. Site data table on Sheet C1.1 indicates 88 parking spaces being provided and only 31 dwellings proposed. Revise /correct. 2. Site data table on Sheet C 1.1 fails to indicate that there are four overnight accommodation units being retained on this property (under proposed density), also requiring one parking space per room (under parking calculations). Sheets C2.1, C3.1 and L1.1 fail to indicate the building to be used for the overnight accommodation units (indicated in the narrative as Building A). Revise /correct. (3, Provide building elevations and floor plans for the overnight accommodation building ✓✓ (Building A). Elevations must indicate how this building is being modified to make it consistent with the new building. Note: Staff will not support this request unles there are improvements to the site around this building, including removing existing encroachments onto this site and encroachment of this site's improvements onto adjacent property. This has been previously communicated to the architect. Make this site one cohesive site. Note: Description of Request narrative indicates that the parking easement on this property on the north side is being terminated by this owner. There may be a Zoning Code issue with such termination, as this parking maybe required parking for the adjoining businesses. Provide documentation that such parking is not required parking for these adjacent businesses. If it produces a reduction to required parking, a request (with all supporting applications, plans, etc.) for such must be filed to run concurrently with this request. Staff may not support any reduction of required parking for such businesses. J5. Submit one original signed and sealed survey (surveys submitted are copies of signed and sealed survey). J6. Property is 1.092 acre. Submit a tree Inventory; prepared by a "certified arborist ", of all trees 8" DBH or greater, reflecting size, canopy (drip lines) and condition of such trees. Indicate trees to be removed and preserved on Sheets C2.1, C3.1 and L1.1. Letter of Incompleteness - FLD2005 -07071 - 678 S GULFVIEW BLVD • °Clearwater 0 July 09, 2005 CITY OF CLE*ARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE: (727) 562 -4567 FAX: (727) 562 -4576 W W W.MYCLEARWATER. COM 70 Provide on Sheet C2.1 dimensions to all structures, including the columns on the east adjacent to Parkway Drive, the columns adjacent to Bayway Blvd, the columns close to the pool, the pool deck, the existing Building A, pavement/pavers /deck/other structures around Building A, the trash staging area from the front property line, the existing pavement from the front property line in the northeast corner �8 Revise address of project in title block on civil and architectural plans from 678 N. Bayway Blvd. to 678 S. Gulfview Blvd. J9. It appears with the architectural plans that Floor 3 is missing or that floor numbering is incorrect. Revise. 10. Provide on Sheet C1.1 a table PER FLOOR of the square footage of nonresidential floor area, number of parking spaces, number of dwellings and number of overnight accommodation units, including the totals of all. 11. Provide on Sheets C2.1 and Ll.I the sight visibility triangles at the intersection of Bayway Blvd and Parkway Drive and adjacent to the driveway (off -site) at the northeast corner of the property on Bayway Blvd. 12. Indicate /show on Sheet C3.1 the utilities to existing Building A (to remain) and whether any improvements are required (such as fire sprinklers and fire hydrant, due to being three story in rr height). d13. Site data table on Sheet C1.1 indicates 11,814 square feet of paved vehicular use area, which requires a minimum of 10 percent of this VUA in interior landscaping. Site data table indicates no proposed interior landscape sqaure footage. Revise. Also depict by shading or crosshatching all required parking lot interior landscaped areas. ,/14. Sheet A -1.9 indicates 20 a/c units. However, there are 31 dwellings proposed, as well as nonresidential floor area. Indicate the location of the other a/c units. Also indicate the location of the outdoor mechanical equipment for the existing Building A (to remain). J15. Indicate screening materials. Civil and architectural plans are not coordinated as to the location of the two elevators within the lobby of the new building, with the civil indicating the elevators located adjacent to the western stairwell and the architectural plans indicating the elevators adjacent to'the easten stairwell. Coordinate plans. This affects the location of the trash room on the ground level and the trash rooms on every floor. Civil and architectural plans are also not coordinated as to the location of the columned entry on the south side of the proposed building into the club house. Revise. © Show /indicate the location of all outdoor lighting fixtures. J 17. Provide in the site data table on Sheet C 1.1 the number of existing overnight accommodation units (by occupational license, 42 rooms /units are listed). 18 Indicate on the building elevations the height of the building from BFE to the highest roof deck (not ceiling), as well as the height of the parapet from the roof deck of the highest roof deck. Ensure these heights are indicated in the site data table on Sheet C 1.1. Letter of Incompleteness - FLD2005 -07071 - 678 S GULFVIEW BLVD LL 0 CITY OF CL RWATER ° ClearWater a PLANNING DEPARTMENT MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING 0 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE: (727) 562 -4567 FAX: (727) 562 -4576 WW W.MYCLEARWATER.COM July 09, 2005 19. Provide the proposed gross floor area and FAR in the site data table on Sheet C1.1 for only the retail and restaurant floor area. 20. Provide the south and east building elevations (including reduced 8.5" x 11" versions of same). 0 Show on Sheets C2.1, C3.1 and L1.1 the edges of both driveways onto Bayway Blvd being curbed. Submit a Comprehensive Landscape Program application, as applicable, if the interior landscape area or foundation planting area requirements are not proposed to be met. Landscape associated with the Comprehensive Landscape Program shall exceed minimum Code requirements to offset the areas where minimum Code will not be met. 23. Show at least in concept all proposed freestanding and attached signs; showing on Sheets C2.1, C3.1 and L1.1 the location and setback from property lines of proposed freestanding signage and on the building elevations the location of proposed attached signage. Details may come later through the building permit review process or through the submission of a Comprehensive Sign Program application. Also address existing signage, which will be required to be brought into conformance with Code requirements (provide at least photographs of existing signage). Letter of Incompleteness - FLD2005 -07071 - 678 S GULFVIEW BLVD LL 0 CITY OF CLARWATER ° Clearwater PLANNING DEPARTMENT MUNICIPAL SERVICES- BUILDING 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE: (727) 562 -4567 FAX: (727) 562 -4576 W W W. MY C LEAR W ATER. C OM July 09, 2005 /24. Add the following mixed use calculation to Sheet C 1.1 (will also email): Mixed Use Calculation for Playa Del Sol Property - 678 South Gulfview Boulevard A. Property is zoned Tourist District (maximum FAR = 1.0 and maximum density = 30 du/acre) 1. Permitted FAR GGI,G000GLGLLG(,LGGGI,Gl,L1.0 2. Multiply #A1 by bldg sq. ftg. of retail & restaurant proposedL ... Z..x 4,015 sf 3. Lot area required to support #A2 in the building 4,015 sf 4. Lot area I,GGLGL000GGGGGLLGLGLGGG� 47,568 sf 5. Subtract the lot area required to support non - residential use in the building ( #A3) 4,015 sf 6. Lot area (sf) to calculate the maximum number of dwelling units L.= 43,553 sf 7. Divide #A6 GGGLLGLGGLGGGGGLLLGGGGG 43,553 sf 8. Land area in an acre GL�LGGGLGGG(,GC GGGLG— 43,560 sf 9. Lot acreage for residential portlonZZ4Z44Z.4ZGZGL••= 0.999 acres 10. Multiply #A9 1.526 acres 11. Maximum density 30 du/acre 12. Maximum number of dwelling units permitted Z�ZZ�44.. = 29 du B. Transfer of Development Rights (TDR) 1. Maximum number of dwelling units permitted Z44�"44. 29 du 2. Multiply by maximum transfer of 20% of #B 1 LLLZZ4�Lx 0.2 3. Maximum number of du to be transferred in to this property LZ ... = 5 du C. Maximum Development Potential for Property 1. Existing Overnight Accommodation Rooms/Units (OVA) to remainZ 4 rooms 2. Conversion of OVA in #Clto dwelling units (40/30 rule) �.ZZZZ 3 du 3. Maximum number of dwelling units ( #Al2)ZZ.�Z�ZZZ�. 29 du 4. Subtract converted OVA to remain ( #C2) from #C% 444ZZ�3 du 5. Maximum # of dwelling unitsZ��44�ZZ�ZZZZZ.Z = 26 du 6. Add in maximum TDR (B3) + 5 du 7. Total number of dwelling units and nonresidential floor area allowable 31 du Letter of Incompleteness - FLD2005 -07071 - 678 S GULFVIEW BLVD °Clearwater July 09, 2005 CITY OF CLERRWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE: (727) 562 -4567 FAX: (727) 562 -4576 W W W.MYCLEARWATER. COM 25. Application includes the Transfer of Development Rights (TDR) from 400 East Shore Drive (sending site) of four dwelling units to this receiving site. The sending site is presently developed with an operating overnight accommodation use of 38 rooms /units. Based on the current maximum density allowable of 40 rooms /units per acre and the site area of the sending site of 0.396 acre (17,250 square feet), the sending site can only support 15 rooms /units today. Therefore, the sending site is currently nonconforming to density. The sending site does not have any dwelling units to transfer to the subject, receiving site. Based on the mixed use calculation, a total of five dwelling units could be requested to be transferred to this site through the TDR process. Either need to reduce the proposed number of dwelling units allowable for this site or need to find dwelling units from other appropriate sending sites. Revise /correct. Section 4 -202 of the Community Development Code states that if an application is deemed incomplete, the deficiencies of the application shall be specified by Staff. No further development review action shall be taken until the deficiencies are corrected and the application is deemed complete. Please resubmit by 4:00 pm on Tuesday, July 12; 2005 (one original and 14 copies of all revised application material). If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at 727 -562 -4504 or Wayne.Wells@myclearwater.com. ISincerely yours, ^�Q�w Wayne Wells Planner III Letter of Incompleteness - FLD2005 -07071 - 678 S GULFVIEW BLVD f� 7/9/05 Mixed Use Calculation for Playa Del Sol Property — 678 South Gulfview Boulevard A. Property is zoned Tourist District (maximum FAR =1.0 and maximum density = 30 du /acre) 1. Permitted FAR ...................................... ............................1.0 2. Multiply #A1 by bldg sq. ftg. of retail & restaurant proposed...........x 4,015 sf 3. Lot area required to support #A2 in the building .........................= 4,015 sf 4. Lot area ......................................... ......... ....................... 47,568 sf 5. Subtract the lot area required to support non - residential use in the building ( #A3) ..... ............................... 4,015 sf 6. Lot area (sf) to calculate the maximum number of dwelling units ....= 43,553 sf 7. Divide #A6 ...................................... ............................... 43,553 sf 8. Land area in an acre ........................... ..............................— 43,560 sf 9. Lot acreage for residential portion ............ .............................. = 0.999 acres 10. Multiply #A9 .................................. ............................... 1.526 acres 11. Maximum density ............................ ..............................x 30 du/acre 12. Maximum number of dwelling units permitted ....................... = 29 du B. Transfer of Development Rights (TDR) 1. Maximum number of dwelling units permitted ......................... 29 du 2. Multiply by maximum transfer of 20% of #B 1 ........................x 0_2 3. Maximum number of du to be transferred in to this property .........= 5 du C. Maximum Development Potential for Property 1. Existing Overnight Accommodation Rooms/Units (OVA) to remain... 4 rooms 2. Conversion of OVA in #Clto dwelling units (40/30 rule) ................ 3 du 3. Maximum number of dwelling units (# Al2 ) ............................. 29 du 4. Subtract converted OVA to remain ( #C2) from #C3 ........................3 du 5. Maximum # of dwelling units ............... ............................... = 26 du 6. Add in maximum TDR (B3) .................. ............................... ± 55 du 7. Total number of dwelling units and nonresidential floor area allowable 31 du LL 0 } 0 FAX COVER MEMO CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT 100 S. MYRTLE AVE. CLEARWATER, FL 33756 (727) 562 -4567 FAX: (727) 562 -4865 TO: 12,D _r&jw , _ Li � .1 a.v—S FAX: Phone: ¢'r 3 - L 6 (of FROM: �-- d Is Phone: s bZ ¢J f9 + DATE:_ �' J `� / 0S RE: Ft UoS- 0 7 v 71 /x&Z,"J'- 0 7•L4. b 7 d S. G �1�,•, t31 ✓a. MESSAGE: -" L- ,P+tr" of NUMBER OF PAGES(INCLUDING THIS PAGE) 7 _ Jul. 10 2005 02:58PM YOUR LOGO CityOfClearwater -Plan Dept YOUR FAX NO. 727 562 4865 NO. OTHER FACSIMILE START TIME USAGE TIME MODE PAGES RESULT 01 94468036 Ju1.10 02:55PM 02'49 SND 07 OK TO TURN OFF REPORT, PRESS 'MENU' #04. THEN SELECT OFF BY USING ' +' OR FOR FAX ADVANTAGE ASSISTANCE, PLEASE CALL 1- 800 -HELP -FAX (435- 7329). Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Saturday, July 09, 2005 11:22 AM To: Doreen Williams (E -mail) Subject: FLD2005- 07071/TDR2005- 07024, 678 S. Gulfview Blvd. Doreen - Letter of incompleteness and mixed use calculation attached. Wayne II li� letter of Mixed Use completeness 7.9.0:alculation for Play.. NorthSide CS 1\ NES Proj# We Transmit: 0 ORIGINAL. LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL July 1, 2005 Sherry L. Watkins, Administrative Analyst City of Clearwater Planning Department 100 S. Myrtle Ave, #210 Clearwater, FL 33756 Clearwater Beach. Resort 0534 X Enclosed Mail Pick -Up Date Under Separate Cover UPS Overnight X Hand Delivered CIVIL • LAND PLANNING • ENVIRONMENTAL • TRANSPORTATION • .011 q t �l . a , X Originals X Prints Addendum Shop drawings Specifications Applications Floppy Disk 15 Civil & Landscape Drawings ( 5 sheets) 15 8.5" X 11" Civil Site Plan 15 8.5" X 11" Colored Landscape Plan 15 Flex Development Applications (Comp. lnfill) 15 Transfer of Development Rights Applications 15 Letter of Authorization & Affidavits 15 Warranty Deeds 15 Surveys (1 signed and sealed 15 Stormwater Report & Narrative (1 signed and sealed) 15 8.5 X 11" Colored Renderings 15 8.5 X 11" Building Elevations 1 Color chip attached to Original Arc. Drawing 15 24 X 36 Architectural Drawings 1 Check #1.220 for 51,205 Comments: For Design Review Committee for 7/1/2005 deadline. Please contact us at (727) 443 -2869 should you have any questions or comments. ~ Copies To: File 414�p N. Pelzer Doreen Williams, Pr ect , irect r A. Haines 601 CLEVELAND STREET, SUI E 930 CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33755 NESADMIN @MIND5PRIN6.COM N E5TECH ®MI NDSPRI N6.COM 727 • 443 • .2869 FAX 727 • '446 • 8036 MEMORANDUM TO: Community Development Board FROM: Wayne M. Wells, AICP WM Planner III RE: Request for Time Extension FLD2005 -07071 — 678 South Gulfview Boulevard DATE: April 23, 2007 Attached is information related to the request by Doreen Williams of Northside Engineering Services, Inc., on behalf of SKTEL, Inc., for an extension of time relative to the above referenced project located at 678 South Gulfview Boulevard. A one -year extension is being requested which would expire on August 21, 2008. Pursuant to Section 4-407 of the Community Development Code, extensions of time "shall be for good cause shown and documented in writing." The Code further delineates that good cause "may include but are not limited to an unexpected national crisis (acts of war, significant downturn in the national economy, etc.), excessive weather - related delays, and the like." In this particular case, the applicant has indicated that the project is being delayed for economic reasons as it relates to deteriorating market conditions and for architectural changes in the plans. It should be noted that, pursuant to Section 4-407, the Planning Director has previously granted a six -month extension. The Code further directs that the Community Development Board may consider whether significant progress on the project is being made and whether or not there are pending or approved code amendments which would significantly affect the project. It should be noted by the Board that in the intervening period subsequent to the original approval, the Code has been amended in the following that affect this project: The requirement for parapet height for buildings with flat roofs has been amended to a maximum of 42- inches. This project was approved with a parapet height of 5.67 feet (from roof deck). Attachments: Letter of Request Time Extension Development Order December 1, 2006 Maps and Photos S: (Planning DepartmentlC D BIFLEX(FLD)IPending,caseslUp for the next CDBIGulfview S 0678 Playa Del Sol (7) #1 Mired Use - Approved - 5.15.07 CDB - WWIGulfview S 678 Time Extension Memorandum for 5.15.07 CDB.doc Jrm� Cx7-6vsrot* F LID2005-07071 678 S GULFVIEW BLVD PLAYA DEL SOL PLANNER OF RECORD: WW ATLAS # 285A ZONING: T LAND USE: RFH RECEIVED: 07/01/2005 INCOMPLETE: COMPLETE: MAPS: PHOTOS: STAFF REPORT: DRC: CDB: CLWCoverSheet Pin &llas County Property App *r Information: 17 29 15 51755 000 0 Page 2 of 8 17 / 29 / 15 / 51755 / 000 / 0000 23- Apr -2007 Jim Smith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 10:50:58 Ownership Information Non - Residential Property Address, Use, and Sales SKTEL INC OBK: 10971 OPG: 0349 678 S GULFVIEW BLVD CLEARWATER FL 33767 -2642 EVAC: A EUAC Comparable sales value as Prop Addr: 678 S GULFVIEW BLVD of Jan 1, 2006, based on Census Tract: .00 sales from 2004 - 2005: 0 Sale Date OR Book /Page Price (Qual /UnQ) Vac /Imp Plat Information 7 /2,000 10,9711 349 1,535,000 (Q) I 1994: Book Pgs - 0 /0 0/ 0 0 { } 0000: Book Pgs - 0 /0 0/ 0 0 { } 0000: Book Pgs - 0 /0 0/ 0 0 { } 2006 Value EXEMPTIONS Just /Market: 2,785,000 Homestead: NO Ownership % .000 Govt Exem: NO Use %: .000 Assessed /Cap: 2,785,000 Institutional Exem: NO Tax Exempt %: .000 Historic Exem: 0 Taxable: 2,785,000 Agricultural: 0 2006 Tax Information District: CW Seawall: Frontage: Clearwater view: 06 Millage: 21.7640 Land Size Unit Land Land Land Front x Depth Price Units Meth 06 Taxes: 60,612.74 1) 270 x 121 50. 00 32, 670.00 S Special Tax .00 2) 60 x 127 50.00 71620.00 S 3) 63 x 121 1, 000. 00 .18 A Without the Save -Our -Homes 4) 0 x 0 .00 .00 cap, 2006 taxes will be 5) 0 x 0 .00 .00 60, 612.74 6) 0 x 0 . 00 .00 Without any exemptions, 2006 taxes will be 60, 612.74 Short Legal LIFETIME OF VACATIONS (UNRECORDED T/S CONDO) Description ALL UNITS (FKA: LOTS 9,10, 11,12,13 & 15 BLK B OF Building Information http: // 136 .174.187.13 /htbin /cgi- scr3 ?o =1 &a =1 &b =1 &c =1 &r= .16 &s= 4 &t3 =1 &u= 0 &p =17... 4/23/2007 Pin611as County Property Appoer Information: 17 29 15 51755 000 06 Property and Land Use Code descriptions • Building-1 • Building-2 • Buildin 3 • Building 4 Building #1 Page 3 of 8 17 / 29 / 15 / 51755 / 000 / 0000 :01 23- Apr -2007 Jim Smith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 10:50:58 Commercial Card 01 of 4 Improvement Type: Hotel /Hotel C 4 St Property Address: 678 S GULFUIEW BLVD Prop Use: 242 Land Use: 04 Structural Elements Foundation Special Footing Floor System Structural Slab Exterior Wall Conc Block /Stucco Height Factor 0 Party Wall None Structural Frame Concrete Reinforced Roof Frame Reinforced Concrete Roof Cover Built Up /Composition Cabinet & Mill Average Floor Finish Carpet Combination Interior Finish Drywall Total Units 0 Heating & Air Heating &Cooling Pckg Fixtures 36 Bath Tile Floor + Half Wall Electric Average Description Factor Shape Factor Rectangle 1) Quality Average 1.00 Year Built 11982 Effective Age 18 Other Depreciation 0 Function Depreciation 0 Economic Depreciation 0 Sub ArcaaS Commercial Extra Features Description Factor Area Value Description Factor Area 1) Base Area 1.00 3,348 7) . 00 0 2) Open Porch .30 2,120 8) .00 0 3) Utility .40 64 9) .00 0 4) Carport .20 4,408 10) .00 0 5) Upper Stry Base Area .90 3,348 11) .00 0 6) SPA /JAC /HT .00 0 12) .00 0 Commercial Extra Features http: // 136 .174.187.131htbinlcgi- scr3 ?o =1 &a =1 &b =1 &c =l &r= .16 &s= 4 &t3 =1 &u= 0 &p =17... 4/23/2007 Description Dimensions Price Units Value RCD Year 1) TEHHISCT 35,000.00 1 35,000 14,000 1,982 2) POOL 30, 000.00 1 30,000 12,000 1'982 3) CONC PAVE 2000SF 4.00 2,000 8,000 8,000 1,982 4) PND /FHT /WF 1,500.00 1 1,500 1,500 11982 5) SHUFBDCT 1,500.00 1 11500 11500 11982 6) SPA /JAC /HT 9,000.00 1 91000 3,600 1,982 TOTAL RECORD VALUE: 40,600 http: // 136 .174.187.131htbinlcgi- scr3 ?o =1 &a =1 &b =1 &c =l &r= .16 &s= 4 &t3 =1 &u= 0 &p =17... 4/23/2007 Pinellas County Property Appoer Information: 17 29 15 51755 000 06 Page 4 of 8 Building #2 17 / 29 / 15 / 51755 / 000 / 4000 :02 23- Apr -2007 Jim Smith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 10:50:58 Commercial Card 02 of 4 Improvement Type: Motel /Hotel C 4 St Property Address: 678 S OULFUIEU BLVD Prop Use: 242 Land Use: 04 Structural E1�m�nts Foundation Special Footing Floor System Structural Slab Exterior Wall Conc Block /Stucco Height Factor 0 Party Wall Hone Structural Frame Concrete Reinforced Roof Frame Reinforced Concrete Roof Cover Built Up /Composition Cabinet & Mill Average Floor Finish Carpet Combination Interior Finish Drywall Total Units 0 Heating & Air Heating &Cooling Pckg Fixtures 48 Bath Tile Floor + Half Wall Electric Average Description Factor Shape Factor Rectangle 1) Quality Average 1.00 Year Built 1,982 Effective Age 18 Other Depreciation 0 Function Depreciation 0 Economic Depreciation 0 Sub Aromas CommoBrcl.al Extra Fsatur�s Description Dimensions Description Factor Area RCO Description Factor Area 1) Base Area 1.00 4,208 7) . 00 0 2) Open Porch .30 3,936 8) .00 0 3) Utility .40 512 9) .00 0 4) Carport .20 4,000 10) .00 0 5) Upper Stry Base Area .90 4,208 11) .00 0 6) .00 0 12) .00 0 CommoBrcl.al Extra Fsatur�s Description Dimensions Price Units Value RCO Year 1) .00 0 0 0 0 2) .00 0 0 0 0 3) .00 0 0 0 0 4) .00 0 0 0 0 5) .00 0 0 0 0 6) .00 0 0 0 0 TOTAL RECORD VALUE: 0 Building #3 http: // 136 .174.187.13 /htbin /cgi- scr3 ?o =1 &a =1 &b =1 &c =1 &r= .16 &s= 4 &t3 =1 &u= 0 &p =17... 4/23/2007 ' Pinbllas County Property AppWer Information: 17 29 15 51755 000 06 Page 5 of 8 17 / 2 / 15 / 51755 / 000 / 0000 :03 23- Apr -2007 Jim Smith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 10:51:00 Commercial Card 03 of 4 Improvement Type: Motel /Hotel t 4 St Property Address: 678 S OULFUIEW BLVD Prop Use: 242 Land Use: 04 Structural Elcmcnts Foundation Special Footing Floor System Structural Slab Exterior Wall Conc Block /Stucco Height Factor 0 Party Wall Hone Structural Frame Concrete Reinforced Roof Frame Reinforced Concrete Roof Cover Built Up /Composition Cabinet & Mill Average Floor Finish Carpet Combination Interior Finish Drywall Total Units 0 Heating & Air Heating &Cooling Pckg Fixtures 36 Bath Tile Floor + Half Wall Electric Average Description Factor Shape Factor Rectangle 1) Quality Average 1.00 Year Built 1,982 Effective Age 18 Other Depreciation 0 Function Depreciation 0 Economic Depreciation 0 Sub Arras Commercial Extra Fcatures Description Dimensions Description Factor Area RCD Description Factor Area 1) Base Area 1.00 3,348 7) . 00 0 2) Open Porch .30 2, 120 8) .00 0 3) Utility .40 64 9) .00 0 4) Carport .20 4,408 10) .00 0 5) Upper Stry Base Area .90 3,348 11) .00 0 6) .00 0 12) .00 0 Commercial Extra Fcatures Description Dimensions Price Units Value RCD Year 1) .00 0 0 0 0 2) .00 0 0 0 0 3) .00 0 0 0 0 4) .00 0 0 0 0 5) .00 0 0 0 0 6) .00 0 0 0 0 TOTAL RECORD VALUE: 0 Building #4 http:// 136 .174.187.13 /htbin /cgi- scr3 ?o =1 &a =1 &b =1 &c =1 &r= .16 &s= 4 &t3 =1 &u= 0 &p =17... 4/23/2007 Pinellas County Property App *r Information: 17 29 15 51755 000 06 Page 6 of 8 17 / 29 / 15 / 51755 / 000 / 0000 :04 23- Apr -2007 Jim Smith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 10:50:58 Commercial Card 04 of 4 Improvement Type: Hotel /Hotel ( 4 St Property Address: 678 S GULFUIEW BLVD Prop Use: 242 Land Use: 04 structural E1�m�nts Foundation Special Footing Floor System Structural Slab Exterior Wall Conc Block /Stucco Height Factor 0 Party Wall Hone Structural Frame Concrete Reinforced Roof Frame Reinforced Concrete Roof Cover Built Up/Composition Cabinet & Mill Average Floor Finish Carpet Combination Interior Finish Drywall Total Units 0 Heating & Air Heating &Cooling Pckg Fixtures 18 Bath Tile Floor t Half Wall Electric Average Description Factor Shape Factor Rectangle 1) Quality Average 1.00 Year Built 1,982 Effective Age 18 Other Depreciation 0 Function Depreciation 0 Economic Depreciation 0 sub Arcas Commcrcial Extra Fsatures Description Dimensions Description Factor Area RCD Description Factor Area 1) Base Area 1.00 1,438 7) .00 0 2) Open Porch .30 788 8) .00 0 3) Utility .40 64 9) .00 0 4) Upper Stry Base Area .90 2,220 10) .00 0 5) 6) .00 0 11) .00 0 6) .00 0 12) .00 0 Commcrcial Extra Fsatures Description Dimensions Price Units Value RCD Year 1) .00 0 0 0 0 2) .00 0 0 0 0 3) .00 0 0 0 0 4) .00 0 0 0 0 5) .00 0 0 0 0 6) .00 0 0 0 0 TOTAL RECORD VALUE: 0 Map With Property Address (non- vacant) 0000a http: // 136 .174.187.13 /htbin /cgi- scr3 ?o =1 &a =1 &b =1 &c =1 &r= .16 &s= 4 &t3 =1 &u= 0 &p =17... 4/23/2007 Pinellas County Property Apper Information: 17 29 15 51755 000 06 ,-- Wwm ' 1/8 Mile Aerial Photograph (2002) 05651 X892 2 06 Oq 0 Page 7 of 8 DE http: // 136 .174.187.131htbinlcgi- scr3 ?o =1 &a =1 &b =1 &c =1 &r= .16 &s= 4 &t3 =1 &u= 0 &p =17... 4/23/2007 Pi- iellas County Property A er In�nnation: 17 29 1_` 51755 000 0� Page 8 of 8 Pinellas County Property Appraiser Parcel Information �acktoSearch P ._ ..._ An explanation of this screen http:H 136 .174.187.13 /hf)iii'�6 -scr3 : o =1 &a =1 &b =1 &c =1 &r =.16& s= 4 &t3 =1 &u= 0 -&p =1; .. 4/23/2007 Message Page 1 of 1 Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Friday, May 05, 2006 6:11 PM To: 'Jayne E. Sears'' Cc: Doreen Williams (E- mail); Troy Perdue (E -mail) Subject: RE: Playa Del Sol FLD2005 -07071 Jayne - I am preparing a response letter. I have also revisited the subject site and Walgreen's. I may have some questions for Doreen and Troy regarding the dumpster situation. Potentially, a response letter (Development Order) can be issued early to mid next week. Wayne - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Jayne E. Sears [mailto:JayneS @jpfirm.com] Sent: Wednesday, May 03, 2006 2:36 PM To: Doreen @northsideengineering.com Cc: Wells, Wayne; Troy J. Perdue Subject: Playa Del Sol FLD2005 -07071 Dr. Patel just called me asking for a recap of where we stand. I told him we are awaiting: 1) Revised sketches and legals from the surveyor re revised easements. 2) Response from Wayne regarding your letter of 4/21/06. When we hear back on these items then Troy can present the revisions to Nick Ekonomides and Louie. Do you agree? Wayne, please respond to Doreen's letter if you have not already done so. Thank you. Jayne E. Sears Legal Assistant Johnson, Pope, Bokor, Ruppel & Burns, LLP 911 Chestnut Street Clearwater, FL 33756 Phone: (727) 461 -1818 Fax: (727) 462 -0365 5/5/2006 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 CDB Meeting Date Case Number: Agenda Item: Owner: Applicant: Representative: Address: 0 February 21, 2006 R"I C I FLD2005 -07071 E2 SKTEL, Inc. Plava Del Sol Resort Mr. Housh Ghovaee, Northside Engineering Services, Inc. 678 South Gulfview Boulevard CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT GENERAL INFORMATION: REQUEST: Flexible Development approval to permit a mixed use (3,650 square feet of office floor area, 27 attached dwellings and four overnight accommodation rooms /units) with reductions to the front (north along Bayway Blvd) setback from 15 feet to 9.6 feet (to building), from 15 feet to five feet (to existing pavement) and from 15 feet to zero feet (to trash staging area), reductions to the front (east along Parkway Drive) setback from 15 feet to 10.3 feet (to building) and from 15 feet to zero feet (to trash staging area), reductions to the side (west) setback from 10 feet to five feet (to pool and patio decks) and from 10 feet to zero feet (to existing pavement and sidewalk), reductions to .the side (south) setback from 10 feet to 7.4 feet (to building), from 10 feet to zero feet (to trash staging area), and from 10 feet to zero feet (to existing sidewalk and pavement), a reduction to the side (east) setback from 10 feet to five feet (to pool deck) and an increase to building height from 35 feet to 85.08 feet (to roof deck) with an additional 5.67 feet for perimeter parapets (from roof deck), as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2- 803.C. EXISTING ZONING/ Tourist (T) District; Resort Facilities High (RFH) Category LAND USE: PROPERTY SIZE: 1.0839 acres; 47,215 square feet PROPERTY USE: Current Use: Overnight accommodations (42 rooms /units) Proposed Use: Mixed use (3,650 square feet of office floor area, 27 attached dwellings and four overnight accommodation rooms /units) Staff Report — Community Development Board — February 21, 2006 Cases FLD2005 -07071 — Page 1 of 12 C 0 ADJACENT ZONING/ North: Tourist District; Attached dwellings LAND USES: East: Tourist District; Retail sales South: Tourist District; Overnight accommodations (approved by CDB for attached dwellings [90 condominiums]) West: Tourist District; Retail sales CHARACTER OF THE IMMEDIATE VICINITY: The surrounding area is developed with attached dwellings, overnight accommodation and retail sales uses. With the redevelopment of properties within this area, overnight accommodation uses are being replaced with attached dwelling projects, either in the form of townhomes or condominium -flat projects. ANALYSIS: Site Location and Existing Conditions: The 1.0839 acres is located between South Gulfview Boulevard and Bayway Boulevard on the west side of Parkway Drive. The site is in the shape of a "T" and is triple fronted, being located on South Gulfview Boulevard (south), Bayway Boulevard (north) and Parkway Drive (east). The site has 60 feet of frontage on South Gulfview Boulevard, 333 feet of frontage on Bayway Boulevard and 117 feet of frontage on Parkway Drive. The site is currently developed with a total of 42 overnight accommodation rooms /units (timeshare). The site is located within the "South Beach/Clearwater Pass District" of Beach by Design, which is a distinctive area of mixed uses including high -rise condominiums, resort hotels and commercial uses. Beach By Design contemplates this District will be an area of strategic revitalization and renovation in response to improving conditions on the balance of Clearwater Beach. The property to the south across South Gulfview Boulevard is presently developed with an overnight accommodation use, but has been approved to be redeveloped with 90 attached dwellings (condominiums) in a building 150 feet tall (Enchantment, 691 South Gulfview Boulevard). The property to the east is presently developed with one -story retail sales uses (adjacent and across Parkway Drive). The property to the west is presently developed with one - story retail sales uses (including Walgreen's). The property to the north is developed with attached dwelling uses, both townhomes (two- stories over ground -level parking) and condominiums (three - stories over ground level parking). The Police Department Substation is across Bayway Boulevard to the northeast. While there are still commercial uses existing in close proximity, redevelopment of properties in this area of the beach is changing the character from a tourist - dominated area of overnight accommodation uses to a residential area of attached dwellings ( townhomes and condominiums). Proposal: As a part of this proposal, the applicant proposes to modify the south property line approximately three feet to the north on the west side to eliminate the present encroachment of the adjacent retail building onto the subject property. This lot line modification will need to be completed prior to the issuance of any permits for this project. The change in the lot line location and its effect on land area has been reflected in the mixed -use calculation for density and intensity ratios for the proposed development on this property. Staff Report — Community Development Board — February 21, 2006 Cases FLD2005 -07071 — Page 2 of 12 0 0 The proposal includes constructing a mixed -use project consisting of 3,650 square feet of office floor area, 27 attached dwellings and four overnight accommodation rooms /units. As a mixed -use project, this proposal has been calculated to not exceed the density and intensity ratios contained in the Comprehensive Plan. The office uses are proposed on the ground floor of the new building facing Bayway Boulevard. A concierge office area on the first floor off of the residential lobby has been provided for the condominium owners. Any approval of this request should include a condition restricting use of this area of the building, as this area is considered accessory to the residential use and cannot be rented out as a general office use. A clubhouse (accessory use) for the condominium residents is located on the south side of the ground floor. There are two levels of parking proposed. A fitness center and game room for the condominium residents are proposed on the second floor (accessory uses). The project includes four overnight accommodation rooms /units (two rooms /units each on the second and third floors) within an existing building facing South Gulfview Boulevard, which will be renovated to be consistent architecturally with the new building. The new building will contain 27 dwelling units on six living floors. Within the new building, the third, fourth and fifth floors will contain six units each, with one unit approximately 1,925 square feet and the other units ranging between 2,637 and 2,784 square feet. The sixth floor will contain two units of 3,012 square feet each and the lower level of three, two - story units (composed of two units with a total of 3,539 square feet between the two levels and one unit of 3,838 square feet between the two levels). The seventh floor will have the upper levels of the three, two -story units from the sixth floor, as well as the lower level of four, two -story units (composed of two units with a total of 6,678 square feet between the two levels and two units with a total of 4,038 square feet between the two levels). The proposed building meets the Design Guidelines of Beach by Design where the plane of the building has been provided with offsets to avoid long linear planes of the building. The proposal includes a total of 86 parking spaces on two levels of the building, whereas a total of 73 parking spaces are required. This project is providing the new requirement of two parking spaces per dwelling unit. Most of the parking is under the building, however, there is some parking on the west side not under the residential portion of the building. Parking for the offices, overnight accommodation guests, dwelling residents and their guests are proposed on the ground floor, which is accessed from Parkway Drive. Parking for dwelling residents only is provided on the second floor, which is accessed from Bayway Boulevard. This site also is retaining existing surface parking spaces for the retail sales businesses (including Walgreen's) on the west side of the site, which is covered through an existing parking easement with the adjacent property owner. The landscaping adjacent to the existing surface parking area must be improved with curbing and with wheel stops (where missing) for the protection of the landscaping. Such curbing and wheel stops must be shown on a revised civil plans prior to the issuance of any permits for this project. The request is being processed as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project due to a "mixed - use" not being a use permitted within the Tourist District. The proposal includes reductions to the front (north along Bayway Blvd) setback from 15 feet to 9.6 feet (to building), from 15 feet to five feet (to existing pavement) and from 15 feet to zero feet (to trash staging area), reductions to the front (east along Parkway Drive) setback from 15 feet to 10.3 feet (to building) and from 15 feet to zero feet (to trash staging area), reductions to the side (west) setback from 10 feet to five feet (to pool and patio decks) and from 10 feet to zero feet (to existing pavement and sidewalk), reductions Staff Report — Community Development Board — February 21, 2006 Cases FLD2005 -07071 — Page 3 of 12 to the side (south) setback from 10 feet to 7.4 feet (to building), from 10 feet to zero feet (to dumpster enclosure), and from 10 feet to zero feet (to existing sidewalk and pavement) and a reduction to the side (east) setback from 10 feet to five feet (to pool deck). The property is in the shape of a "T," where the property has the greatest property length along Bayway Boulevard. The proposal includes a reduction to the front setback to 9.6 feet to the northwest corner of the building and to 9.7 feet to the northeast corner of the building. This dimension is actually to the columns for the entry overhangs and the balconies for Floors 2 — 8. The wall of the building for the first two floors is at approximately 14 feet from the front property line along Bayway Boulevard. The exterior walls for the dwellings on Floors 3 — 8 are approximately 21 feet from the front property line along Bayway Boulevard. The project to the north at 692 Bayway Boulevard was approved and constructed with a front setback of five feet to the elevator and nine feet to the stairwell. This proposed building steps back to approximately 38 feet to the second floor parking deck on the west side. The existing parking area on the west side for the adjacent retail uses ( Walgreen's), covered through a parking easement, must be retained. This existing parking area is at a five -foot front setback to Bayway Boulevard. The proposed reductions to the front setback to the east along Parkway Drive is 10.3 feet at the northeast corner of the building and 11.9 feet at the southeast corner of the building. Except for the stairwell on the east side of the building, these front setbacks are to the columns for the open balconies (actual exterior wall of the dwellings is at approximately 17 — 18 feet from the front property line along Parkway Drive. The commercial building for Surf Style at 700 South Gulfview Boulevard (across Parkway Drive) was approved and constructed at a front setback from Parkway Drive of two feet to the building. The side setback reduction to the south property line to the adjacent retail sales buildings of 7.4 feet on the east side and eight feet on the west side is to balcony "bump outs" for Floors 1 — 5, but is to the actual exterior wall of the dwellings for Floors 6 — 8. The side setback reduction to the west property lines occurs at two locations of the "T" shaped property. On the extreme west side adjacent to Walgreen's the pavement for the existing parking area for Walgreen's is at a zero setback, which must be retained due to this parking being required parking for the adjacent retail businesses and is covered under a parking easement. On the lower portion of the "T" where the existing overnight accommodation building is being retained, an existing patio /sidewalk on the west side of that building is being removed to create a five -foot wide landscape area along the property line. The existing pool on the property is being removed. A new pool between, and for, the residential and overnight accommodation buildings is proposed with the pool deck at a five - foot side setback on the east and west sides. All but a sidewalk adjacent to the east side of the overnight accommodation building is being removed, which will be landscaped as part of this proposal. Existing buildings, pavement and patios on the retail parcels to the east and west of the overnight accommodation building are located between zero and five feet. With regard to the front setback reductions from Bayway Boulevard and Parkway Drive related to the trash staging areas, the building will have a refuse collection room on the ground floor next to the residential lobby. A dumpster enclosure for Walgreen's is being provided on this property at the southwest corner of the new building. Dumpsters or recycling carts will be rolled out to the staging areas on collection days. The location of the trash staging areas within the front setback are necessary to eliminate the necessity of the trash truck coming on -site and are common with many newer developments. The requested flexibility in regard to required setbacks is justified by the benefits to an upgraded site appearance to the surrounding area. The proposal is compatible and consistent with the attached dwelling character of the immediate vicinity. Staff Report — Community Development Board — February 21, 2006 Cases FLD2005 -07071 — Page 4 of 12 r • The proposal includes an increase to building height from 35 feet to 85.08 feet (to roof deck) with an additional 5.67 feet for perimeter parapets (from roof deck). The site is located within the "South Beach/Clearwater Pass District" of Beach by Design, which is a distinctive area of mixed uses including high -rise condominiums, resort hotels and commercial uses. Beach By Design contemplates this District will be an area of strategic revitalization and renovation in response to improving conditions on the balance of Clearwater Beach. The proposed building replaces three two -story over ground level parking overnight accommodation buildings. Attached dwelling projects constructed across Bayway Boulevard are lower in height (656: 31 feet; 674: 31 feet; and 692: 42 feet), while projects farther west are taller in height (600: 45.43 feet; 514: 93 feet). The project at 706 Bayway Boulevard northeast of the subject site was approved at a height of 87.25 feet. The residential buildings in the Clearwater Point attached dwelling project east of Gulf Boulevard are close to 100 feet in height. To the south across South Gulfview Boulevard, the existing Continental Towers building at 675 South Gulfview Boulevard is 94.7 feet in height, while there are other projects are approved to be constructed of similar height or taller (655: 99.5 feet; 691: 150 feet; and 715: 150 feet). The proposed height is compatible and consistent with other projects within this "South Beach/Clearwater Pass District." The proposal includes a request to increase the height of perimeter parapets around the edge of the roof deck an additional 5.67 feet (from roof deck), where the Code permitted maximum is 30- inches. This increase may be viewed as making the parapets proportional in respect to the height of the building and to aid in the screening of the rooftop air conditioning units. The Mediterranean -style of architecture of the building will include alternating vertical areas of the fagade in soft apricot and youthful coral stucco for the main building color, accented by corona (off white) on the horizontal bands and on columns, windows, door frames and railings. The landscape plan utilizes groundcover (variegated minima jasmine), shrubs (viburnum, Indian hawthorne, petite pink oleander and cast iron plant) and trees (cabbage palm, live oak, crape myrtle and ligustrum tree). All areas of the site will be heavily planted, including the area around the existing overnight accommodation building fronting on South Gulfview Boulevard, which will provide a pleasing appearance for this entire project. The areas on the west side of the site around the existing parking area for Walgreen's must also be improved to the same standard as the new areas of the site, which should be shown on a revised landscape plan prior to the issuance of any permits. The applicant is proposing two monument -style signs oriented toward Bayway Boulevard and Parkway Drive. There is an existing freestanding sign in front of the existing, to- remain overnight accommodation building oriented to South Gulfview Boulevard, which is nonconforming to current Code provisions. The applicant acknowledges that this sign will need to be removed and any replacement freestanding sign will need to meet Code provisions. Any future freestanding sign should be a monument -style at a maximum four feet in height (unless a maximum six -foot height is approved through a Comprehensive Sign Program) and be designed to match the exterior materials and color of the building. On -site utility facilities (electric and communication lines) will be required to be placed underground as part of the site redevelopment. Provisions for the placement of conduits for the future undergrounding of existing aboveground utility facilities in Staff Report — Community Development Board — February 21, 2006 Cases FLD2005 -07071 — Page 5 of 12 the public right -of -way should be completed prior to the issuance of the first certificate of occupancy in a manner acceptable to the utility companies and the City. All applicable Code requirements and criteria including, but not limited to, General Applicability criteria (Section 3 -913) and Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria (Section 2- 803.C) have been met. Code Enforcement Analysis: There is an active enforcement issue associated with this site. The buildings on the north side are not being maintained, with facia missing allowing fowl and vermin access to the inside of the building (CDC2005- 01801). CnMPLIANCE WITH gTANDARM ANII CRITERIA- (Sections 2 -801.1 and 2 -803) STANDARD PROPOSED CONSISTENT INCONSISTENT MAXIMUM 27 dwelling units, four overnight X DENSITY (maximum accommodation rooms /units and 3,650 30 dwelling units per square feet of office use (a) acre; 40 rooms /units overnight accom. per acre; FAR of 1.0) (27 dwelling units, four rooms /units overnight accom. and 3,650 sf office use maximum IMPERVIOUS 0.86 X SURFACE RATIO ISR (0.95 maximum) LOT AREA 1.0839 acres; 47,215 square feet X (Attached dwellings: 5,000 — 10,000 sf; overnight accom: 10,000 — 20,000 sf; offices: 10,000 sf minimum LOT WIDTH North (along Bayway Blvd): 333 feet X (Attached dwellings: East (along Parkway Dr): 117 feet 50 -100 feet; overnight South (along S. Gulfview Blvd): 60 accom: 100 -150 feet; feet offices: 100 feet minimum Staff Report — Community Development Board — February 21, 2006 Cases FLD2005 -07071 — Page 6 of 12 • 0 STANDARD PROPOSED CONSISTENT INCONSISTENT FRONT SETBACK North: 9.6 feet (to building); five feet X* (Zero -15 feet) (to existing pavement); zero feet (to trash staging area) East: 10.3 feet (to building); zero feet (to trash staging area) South: 20 feet (to building); 16.3 feet (to sidewalk) REAR SETBACK Corner lot (three fronts; all other: X sides SIDE SETBACK East: five feet (to pool deck) X* (0 -10 feet) West: five feet (to pool and patio decks); zero feet (to existing pavement and sidewalk) South: 7.4 feet (to building), zero feet (to trash staging area) HEIGHT (35 -100 feet 85.08 feet (to roof deck) with an X* maximum) additional 5.67 feet for perimeter parapets (from roof deck PARKING SPACES 86 spaces total X (Attached dwellings: two spaces per unit; overnight accom: one space per room/unit; office: four spaces/ 1000 sf) (73 spaces required) * See discussion under Analysis. (a) Based on a mixed -sue calculation utilizing the maximum density and intensity ratios and the size of the property. Staff Report — Community Development Board — February 21, 2006 Cases FLD2005 -07071 — Page 7 of 12 0 0 COMPLIANCE WITH COMPREHENSIVE INFILL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT FLEXIBILITY CRITERIA (Section 2- 803.C): * See discussion under Analysis. Staff Report — Community Development Board — February 21, 2006 Cases FLD2005 -07071 — Page 8 of 12 Consistent Inconsistent 1. The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for X development is otherwise impractical without deviations from the use, intensity and development standards. 2. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a X Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project will not reduce the fair market value of abutting properties. 3. The uses within the Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project are X otherwise permitted in the City of Clearwater. 4. The use or mix of uses within the Comprehensive Infill X Redevelopment Project are compatible with adjacent land uses. 5. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a X Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project will upgrade the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. 6. The design of the proposed Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment X Project creates a form and function that enhances the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. 7. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height and off- X street parking are justified by the benefits to community character and the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. 8. Adequate off - street parking in the immediate vicinity according to the X shared parking formula in Division 14 of Article 3 will be available to avoid on- street parking in the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. 9. The design of all buildings complies with the Tourist District design X guidelines in Division 5 of Article 3. * See discussion under Analysis. Staff Report — Community Development Board — February 21, 2006 Cases FLD2005 -07071 — Page 8 of 12 0 0 COMPI.IANC'F WITH C:FNFRAL STANDARDS (Section 3 -913): * See discussion under Analysis. FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW: FINDINGS OF FACT 1. The subject 1.0839 acres is zoned Tourist District and is located within the "South Beach/Clearwater Pass District" of Beach by Design; 2. The site is in the shape of a "T" and is triple fronted, with 333 feet of lot width on Bayway Boulevard, 117 feet of lot width on Parkway Drive and 60 feet of lot width on South Gulfview Boulevard; 3. The site is currently developed with a total of 42 overnight accommodation rooms /units; 4. The proposal includes constructing a mixed use (3,650 square feet of office floor area, 27 attached dwellings and four overnight accommodation rooms /units), a use not permitted in the Tourist District, which is the reason for processing the request as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project; 5. As a mixed -use project, this proposal has been calculated to not exceed the density and intensity ratios contained in the Comprehensive Plan; 6. The proposal includes a modification to the south property line approximately three feet to the north on the west side to eliminate the encroachment of the adjacent retail building onto the subject property; 7. The proposed building of a total of eight stories (height of 85.08 feet to roof deck) is consistent with that envisioned for the "South Beach/Clearwater Pass District" by Beach by Design, where building heights range from 31 feet to 150 feet in the surrounding area; 8. Setback reductions along Bayway Boulevard, which is the main or longest fagade facing a roadway, are actually to the columns for the entry overhangs and the balconies for Floors 2 — 8, while the wall of the building for the first two floors is at approximately 14 feet from the front property line along Bayway Boulevard and the exterior walls for the dwellings on Floors 3 — 8 are approximately 21 feet from the front property line along Bayway Boulevard; Staff Report — Community Development Board — February 21, 2006 Cases FLD2005 -07071 — Page 9 of 12 Consistent Inconsistent 1. Development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, X coverage, density and character of adjacent properties. 2. Development will not hinder or discourage development and use of X adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. 3. Development will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons X residing or working in the neighborhood. 4. Development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. X 5. Development is consistent with the community character of the X immediate vicinity. 6. Design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, X including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts on adjacent properties. * See discussion under Analysis. FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW: FINDINGS OF FACT 1. The subject 1.0839 acres is zoned Tourist District and is located within the "South Beach/Clearwater Pass District" of Beach by Design; 2. The site is in the shape of a "T" and is triple fronted, with 333 feet of lot width on Bayway Boulevard, 117 feet of lot width on Parkway Drive and 60 feet of lot width on South Gulfview Boulevard; 3. The site is currently developed with a total of 42 overnight accommodation rooms /units; 4. The proposal includes constructing a mixed use (3,650 square feet of office floor area, 27 attached dwellings and four overnight accommodation rooms /units), a use not permitted in the Tourist District, which is the reason for processing the request as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project; 5. As a mixed -use project, this proposal has been calculated to not exceed the density and intensity ratios contained in the Comprehensive Plan; 6. The proposal includes a modification to the south property line approximately three feet to the north on the west side to eliminate the encroachment of the adjacent retail building onto the subject property; 7. The proposed building of a total of eight stories (height of 85.08 feet to roof deck) is consistent with that envisioned for the "South Beach/Clearwater Pass District" by Beach by Design, where building heights range from 31 feet to 150 feet in the surrounding area; 8. Setback reductions along Bayway Boulevard, which is the main or longest fagade facing a roadway, are actually to the columns for the entry overhangs and the balconies for Floors 2 — 8, while the wall of the building for the first two floors is at approximately 14 feet from the front property line along Bayway Boulevard and the exterior walls for the dwellings on Floors 3 — 8 are approximately 21 feet from the front property line along Bayway Boulevard; Staff Report — Community Development Board — February 21, 2006 Cases FLD2005 -07071 — Page 9 of 12 0 1 0 9. Setback reductions are consistent with existing or approved development projects within the surrounding area; 10. Parking provided for this project exceeds the minimum requirements for attached dwellings, overnight accommodations and office uses; 11. The proposal is compatible and consistent with the existing and emerging attached dwelling character of the surrounding area; and 12. There is an active code enforcement case for the parcel. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW 1. Staff concludes that the proposal complies with the Flexible Development criteria as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project per Section 2- 803.C; 2. Staff further concludes that the proposal is in compliance with the General Applicability criteria per Section 3 -913 and the other standards of the Code; and 3. Based on the above findings and proposed conditions, Staff recommends approval of this application. SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION: The Development Review Committee reviewed the application and supporting materials on September 29, 2005, and on December 8, 2005. The Planning Department recommends APPROVAL of the Flexible Development application to permit a mixed use (3,650 square feet of office floor area, 27 attached dwellings and four overnight accommodation rooms /units) with reductions to the front (north along Bayway Blvd) setback from 15 feet to 9.6 feet (to building), from 15 feet to five feet (to existing pavement) and from 15 feet to zero feet (to trash staging area), reductions to the front (east along Parkway Drive) setback from 15 feet to 10.3 feet (to building) and from 15 feet to zero feet (to trash staging area), reductions to the side (west) setback from 10 feet to five feet (to pool and patio decks) and from 10 feet to zero feet (to existing pavement and sidewalk), reductions to the side (south) setback from 10 feet to 7.4, feet (to building), from 10 feet to zero feet (to trash staging area), and from 10 feet to zero feet (to existing sidewalk and pavement), a reduction to the side (east) setback from 10 feet to five feet (to pool deck) and an increase to building height from 35 feet to 85.08 feet (to roof deck) with an additional 5.67 feet for perimeter parapets (from roof deck), as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2- 803.C, for the site at 678 South Gulfview Boulevard, with the following bases and conditions: Bases for Approval: 1. The proposal complies with the Flexible Development criteria as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project per Section 2- 803.C. 2. The proposal is in compliance with other standards in the Code including the General Applicability Criteria per Section 3 -913. 3. The development is compatible with the surrounding area and will enhance other redevelopment efforts. Staff Report — Community Development Board — February 21, 2006 Cases FLD2005 -07071 — Page 10 of 12 0 0 Conditions of Approval: 1. That the final design and color of the buildings be consistent with the conceptual elevations submitted to, or as modified by, the CDB; 2. That a Unity of Title be recorded in the public records prior to the issuance of any permits; 3. That, prior to the issuance of any permits, a Minor Lot Adjustment be submitted to the Planning Department, approved and recorded in the public records; 4. That the condominium concierge office area be solely accessory to the attached dwellings on this property. This office area on the first floor shall not be converted to general tenant office space; 5. That, prior to the issuance of any permits, the civil plans be revised to curb the edges of pavement and provide wheel stops for the existing surface parking area on the west side; 6. That, prior to the issuance of any permits, the landscape plan be revised to show the west side of the site improved to the same standard as the new areas of the site, acceptable to the Planning Department; 7. That a condominium plat be recorded prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy; 8. That any future freestanding signs be monument -style designed to match the exterior materials and color of the buildings. The maximum height shall be four feet, unless approved at a height of six feet high through a Comprehensive Sign Program. Existing signage shall be brought into compliance with Code provisions; 9. That all proposed utilities (from the right -of -way to the proposed building) be placed underground. Conduits for the future undergrounding of existing utilities within the abutting right -of -way shall be installed along the entire site's street frontages prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. The applicant's representative shall coordinate the size and number of conduits with all affected utility providers (electric, phone, cable, etc.), with the exact location, size and number of conduits to be approved by the applicant's engineer and the City's Engineering Department prior to the commencement of work; 10. That all utility equipment including but not limited to wireless communication facilities, electrical and gas meters, etc. be screened from view and/or painted to match the building to which they are attached, as applicable, prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy; 11. That all Fire Department requirements be met prior to the issuance of any permits; 12. That all Parks and Recreation fees be paid prior to the issuance of any permits; and 13. That, prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy, traffic impact fees be assessed and paid. Prepared by: Planning Department Staff: �- . Lau, Wayn M. Wells, AICP, Planner III Staff Report — Community Development Board — February 21, 2006 Cases FLD2005 -07071 — Page 11 of 12 • ATTACHMENTS: Location Map Aerial Map Zoning Map Existing Surrounding Uses Map Application 0 S: (Planning DepartmenllC D BIFLEX (FLD)Wending casesl Up for the next CD&Gulfview S 678 Playa Del Sol (T) #1 Mixed Use 2.21.06 CDB - WMGulfview S 678 Staff Report.doc Staff Report — Community Development Board — February 21, 2006 Cases FLD2005 -07071 — Page 12 of 12 Resume Wayne M. Wells, AICP 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, FL 33756 727 -562 -4504 wayne.wells(a,myclearwater.com PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE • Planner III Planning Department, City of Clearwater, FL November 2001 to Present As part of the Development Review Division, prepared and presented staff reports for Flexible Standard Development (staff -level cases), Flexible Development (public hearing cases) and Plats before the Development Review Committee and the Community Development Board and Development Agreements before the City Council; reviewed building permits for Code conformance; prepared and/or assisted preparation of Code amendments; provided public information (via telephone, mail, email, zoning counter or predevelopment meetings). • Zoning Coordinator Zoning Division, City of Pinellas Park, FL March 1989 to November 2001 Acting Zoning Director, Represented the Zoning Division on cases and issues before the City Council, Community Redevelopment Agency, Planning and Zoning Commission, Board of Adjustment and outside agencies; Prepared and presented staff reports for land use plan amendments, rezoned, planned unit developments, conditional uses, variances and site plans; reviewed final site plans and building permits for Code conformance; prepared and/or assisted preparation of Code amendments; provided public information (via telephone, mail, zoning counter or predevelopment meetings). • Program Manager, Zoning Branch Manatee County Department of Planning and Development June 1984 to March 1989 Bradenton, FL Trained and supervised three employees; Prepared and presented variances and appeals to the Board of Zoning Appeals; Coordinated final site plan and building permit review for Code conformance; Assisted in preparation of Code amendments; Provided public information (via telephone, mail, zoning counter or predevelopment meetings). Interim Code Enforcement Manager- Managed the Code Enforcement Section; supervised six employees; prosecuted cases before the Code Enforcement Board; investigated and prepared cases of alleged violations of land use and building codes. Planner II, Current Planning Section — Prepared and presented staff reports for rezones, planned developments, special permits, plats and mobile home parks to Planning Commission and Board of County Commissioners; reviewed final site plans and building permits for Code enforcement; assisted in preparation of Code amendments; provided public information (via telephone, mail, zoning counter or predevelopment meetings). P-j • • Planner I Alachua County Department of Planning and Development June 1980 to June 1984 Gainesville, FL Prepared and presented staff reports for rezones and special permits to Planning Commission and Board of County Commissioners; reviewed site plans and plats for Code conformance; assisted in preparation of Code amendments; provided public information (via telephone, mail, zoning counter or predevelopment meetings). Intern — Compiled and coordinated the Alachua County Information and Data Book; drafted ordinance revisions; general research. • Graduate Assistant University of Florida Department of Urban and Regional Planning 1979 to 1981 Gainesville, FL Coordinated downtown study for Mayo, FL; coordinated graphics for Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan. • Planning Technician Planning Division, City of St. Petersburg, FL 1977 to 1979 Prepared primarily graphics, for both publication and presentation; Division photographer for 1 %2 years; worked on historic survey and report. EDUCATION Master of Arts in Urban and Regional Planning (Degree not conferred; course work completed, thesis not completed), University of Florida, 1981 Bachelor of Design in Architecture, University of Florida, 1976 LICENSES & CERTIFICATES American Institute of Certified Planners American Planning Association, Suncoast Section February 9, 2006 City of Clearwater } Planning Department FER I }AQ Attn: Wayne M. Wells, AICP Planner III 100 S. Myrtle Ave. Clearwater, Fl 33756 Re: Proposed changes to the Clearwater Beach Resort (Playa Del Sol Resort) at 678 South Gulfview Blvd., Clearwater Beach Dear Mr. Wells: Clearwater Beach area is an area that is changing at a very fast pace. Many luxurious condo /townhouses/hotels are being built which increase market value for all owners of property on the beach. Our street ( Bayway Blvd.) is somewhat unique because it has recently changed from "mostly commercial property" to "mostly residential property" with some commercial. For example, the motel at 678 South Gulfview Blvd. (Clearwater Beach Resort) faces our townhouses at 656 Bayway Blvd. Our townhouse complex consists of 11 units and the majority of owners are full time residence. We shop at local stores, entertain friends and family, enjoy our fabulous beaches and send our children to local schools. We take pride in our homes and are very concerned about the appearance of our neighborhood. As neighbors of the existing Clearwater Beach Resort, we have several concerns about the new building (Playa Del Sol Resort) that is being pioposed to replace this motel: 1. The height of the new structure: Mr. Patel is requesting that the building height be increased from 35 ft. to 85.08 ft. We feel that this height is detrimental to the appearance of our neighborhood and will create the "tunnel" affect that is a major criticism of our neighboring street Brightwater. Currently, the new townhouse /condo developments on the 600 block are 3 to 5 stories in height. We are requesting that the building height be no higher than 50 ft. to conform to the new residential structures on the 600 block of Bayway Blvd. 2. The setback of the new structure: Mr. Patel is requesting that the setback of the structure be reduced on the north along Bayway Blvd from 15 ft. to 9.6 ft. Again, we feel that this will contribute to the "tunnel" affect that is a major criticism of our neighboring street Brightwater and will leave little room for landscaping, sidewalks and green space. We are requesting that the setback remain at 15 ft. along Bayway Blvd to allow for additional landscaping, larger sidewalks and more green space. This will help avoid the "tunnel" affect, soften the appearance of the building and be in keeping with the current residential neighborhood. 0 -2- 0 Re: Proposed changes to the Clearwater Beach Resort (Playa Del Sol Resort) at 678 South Gulfview Blvd., Clearwater Beach As you know, we currently have concerns with the lack of property maintenance on the existing Clearwater Beach Motel. The motel was damaged last year during the hurricane season (well over 6 months ago) and has never been repaired. The existing motel consists of three individual motel structures. Extensive fascia and exterior wallboards are missing from all three buildings. Of the three structures, it appears that the owner (Mr. Patel) is currently renting motel rooms in one or two of these buildings; the other building(s) appears to be vacant with mattress and furniture against the windows. We feel the condition of these buildings creates several problems for our neighborhood: Given that the rented building(s) has fascia and exterior boards missing, animals and insects can crawl into the buildings thereby creating a health issue. All 3 buildings are an eyesore, actually look abandoned, and are a very unattractive site for our neighborhood. The fact that the structure(s) looks abandoned/uninhabited, invites crime and additional littering and loitering. Since last year, we have requested that the City of Clearwater Code Enforcement Department require that Mr. Patel make the repairs to the existing building since he is still actively operating this motel. We understand the motel may be demolished and a new resort constructed at some point in the future, but this may take several months or even years. To date, Mr. Patel has not made any of the repairs to the exterior of the building and it is truly an eyesore. As I mentioned earlier, we are in a changing community and we need to work together to make this beautiful beach area even better and more desirable. Please feel free to contact me at (727) 812 -9831 if you have any questions or need additional information. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, Share Mancuso cc: Leslie F. Howell, President of 656 Bayway Townhome Homeowners Assoc., Inc. Michael -Scott, Secretary of 656 Bayway Townhome Homeowners Assoc., Inc. Robert Mancuso, Treasurer of 656 Bayway Townhome Homeowners Assoc., Inc. Teri R.Averill, LCAM, Representing First Choice Assoc. Mgmt., Inc. Frank Hibbard, Mayor of City of Clearwater Shelby Brown, Code Enforcement Officer for City of Clearwater .,,,Bob Hall, Manager of Development & Neighborhood Services for City of Clearwater t/ Michael Delk, Planning Manager for City of Clearwater 0 .6 t $ Oar PAS6AG8 i P1Br� 0 CmrBwaY 6Ad �5 ^j (/ �(J Y v WNMARG 6� Q RAT 67 C MIRE 67 OR q_ � o 'Y M tf I% �l�+t WA7FR Rt FIFM �7 ecrS1 x � PROJECT SITE r s Hass 0 0 Location Map Owner. SKTEL, Inc. Case: FLD2005 -07071 Site: 678 South Gulfview Boulevard Property Size(Acres): 1.09 PIN: 17/29/15/51755/000 /0000 Atlas Page: 285A • r N i 1! b1 `'•'ter � - � .. Rf yy ' OV ,,..._ �. ■I��Iwr111 Al IL F � ; - r .. ... •`sG 2' Aerial Map Owner: SKTEL, Inc. Case: FLD2005 -07071 Site: 678 South Gulfview Boulevard Property 1.09 Size(Acres): PIN: 17/29/15/51755/000/0000 Atlas Page: 285A • 0 P - ! �0 Ay B4 - I - -_- 30, � �_- I I / 84 VD I ell 89 J \ t ; - -I 1 ti I P715 I � -1 Zoning Map Owner: SKTEL, Inc. Case: FLD2005 -07071 Site: 678 South Gulfview Boulevard Property 1.09 Size (Acres) : PIN: 17/29/15/51755/000 /0000 Atlas Page: 285A 0 Q 1 Ada l�dkvellings� YW ye VD ti e _ Police Outdoor w N s_ ;` -, S bstati / enterfa anent ngs 1 del s tt�ched tai RetailfSales' , O might r- `�--- - - - - -- o a ommodat'�ons _/ a y> taiY ales' Retail Sales 1 m U. Attached ````- S '` -- ` ' - - -- - GU��EWg� dwellings VD vernight '- acpWmmodation / L,' 'a- cc-o"odations l I �1 I 1 715 % I 1 Existing Surrounding Uses Map Owner. SKTEL, Inc. Case: FLD2005 -07071 Site: 678 South Gulfview Boulevard Property 1.09 Size(Acres): PIN: 17/29/15/51755/000 /0000 Atlas Page: 285A • View looking north at existing overnight accom. View looking north at south side of existing overnight accom. and 696 S. Gulfview Blvd. View looking southeast from Bayway Blvd. at north side of sut ject property 678 South Gulfview Boulevard FLD2005 -07071 View looking north at area betw. existing overnight accom. building and retail sales to the west View looking south at north side of subject property (on left), existing parking & Walgreen's on right View looking southwest at subject property at intersection of Bayway Blvd. & Parkway Drive Page 1 of 3 View looking west at area between ex. development on subiect uronerty & 696 S. Gulfview Blvd. View looking southwest at retail sales /restaurant at 696 S. Gulfview Blvd. View looking northeast at retail sales at 700 S. Gulfview Blvd. 678 South Gulfview Boulevard FLD2005 -07071 r� i f = View looking west at adjacent retail sales from View looking east at Bay Bazaar shoppi-ig center (east of Parkway Dr betw. Bayway & S. Gulfview) o` 7 Page 2 of 3 View looking northwest at existing retail sales to west & south of subject property View looking northwest at 656 Bayway Blvd. (attached dwellings — townhomes) View looking northeast at 692 Bayway Blvd. (attached dwellings — condominiums) 678 South Gulfview Boulevard FLD2005 -07071 View looking northwest zt existing adjacent retail sales (`1Valgreen's) to wes of subject prop -Irty View looking northeast at 674 Bayway blvd. (attached dwellings — townhomes) Page 3 of 3 Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Monday, February 13, 2006 2:52 PM To: Watkins, Sherry Subject: Nick Fritsch Sherry - Regarding Case FLD2005- 07071, 678 S. Gulfview Blvd. (Playa Del Sol), Northside Engineering has changed out Sheet C1.1, at my request, changing only the "Existing Lot Area," where the number changed to 47,569 square feet (increase of 354 square feet). Part of this proposal is the modification of the lot line with the adjacent retail parcel to the south so that the lot line does not go through the retail building, thereby reducing the subject parcel's "Proposed Lot Area" to that shown at 47,215 square feet (47,569 - 354 = 47,215). Wayne "--I Wells, Wayne 0 0 From: Brown, Shelby Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2006 12:24 PM To: Wells, Wayne; Hall, Bob Cc: Kronschnabl, Jeff Subject: 678 S. Gulfview Blvd., CWB Resort, Compliance Met Please be advised that the repairs have been made to this property; compliance has been met and the case will be closed. I have advised Dr. Patel of such and I'll also follow -up with the neighbor who had complained. Shelby - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Brown, Shelby Sent: Monday, February 13, 2006 11:09 AM To: Hall, Bob; Wells, Wayne Cc: Kronschnabl, Jeff Subject: FW: 678 S. Gulfview Blvd., CWB Resort Hello All - wanted to give you an update on this case (CDC2005- 01801).... I spoke with Dr. Patel this morning, 543 -5599. We discussed the outstanding violation, the complaints from neighboring properties, a hearing before the CEB, etc. He said he did not wish for the case to come before the CEB and agreed to voluntarily comply by making arrangements to have the missing fascia replaced and painted. He agreed to contact me by the end of the week to confirm that the arrangements had been made with a timeframe for completion. I'll hope the above scenario plays out, however, should it not I'll have everything ready to move forward with CEB for 3/22/06. Shelby - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Friday, January 27, 2006 2:29 PM To: Brown, Shelby Cc: Hall, Bob; Thompson, Neil Subject: RE: 678 S. Gulfview Blvd. Shelby - As a normal practice, we mention in the Staff Report whether there are any active Code Enforcement cases. Short of including a condition of approval regarding property maintenance, which is something we will not include, any agreement from the property owner to correct the violation should be pursued by you through whatever Code Enforcement procedures possible. This issue just needs to be dealt with (he can fix/repair however temporary it may be or he can demolish the building to come into compliance). Wayne - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Brown, Shelby Sent: Monday, January 23, 2006 4:25 PM To: Wells, Wayne Cc: Hall, Bob Subject: FW: 678 S. Gulfview Blvd. Hello Wayne - I met w /Jeff & Bob, we were wondering.... would it be possible to incorporate something into the CDB application process that addresses the property maintenance case? Not necessarily a condition of approval, but possibly agreement from the property owner to correct the violation in the short term. Your thoughts, please or just give me a call. Thanks! Shelby - ext. 5275 - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Brown, Shelby Sent: Monday, January 23, 2006 3:14 PM To: Hall, Bob Subject: FW: 678 S. Gulfview Blvd. Hi Bob, FYI Message from Wayne is in reference to the Clearwater Beach Resort (hotel across the street from the P.D. sub - station on Bayway). Property maintenance violation (missing fascia on every building, very unsightly) has not been corrected. Owner (Dr. Patel) has told me they aren't planning to make repairs because eventually buildings will be coming down, however property still continues to be open for business and it could be months /year before they move forward with construction of the new condos (even if approved through CDB).. Next step for enforcement would be CEB. Before moving ahead, could we please run through Jeff, make sure there aren't any potential land mines with this project? Thanks very much, Shelby - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Monday, January 23, 2006 11:01 AM To: Brown, Shelby Subject: 678 S. Gulfview Blvd. Shelby - The Flexible Development application for this address is scheduled for review and decision by the Community Development Board (CDB) on February 21, 2006 (FLD2005- 07071). I will let you know of the CDB decision when they make it. Wayne Ir, �# gilppl' JrY � � t •' : y r 0 0 Conditions Associated With FLD2005 -07071 678 S GULFVIEW BLVD Landscape Wayne Wells, AICP 727- 562 -4504 0912812005 2110106 - WW Not Met Include as a condition of approval. 1/16/06 - WW Edges of driveway on Bayway Blvd and existing parking area to remain on west side of site must be curbed. Additionally, if existing parking spaces to remain on west side do not presently have wheel stops, wheel stops must be provided. Revise Sheet C3.1. 12/21/05 - WW No sheet indicates that 6" vertical curbing is to be installed in such areas. Indicate on Sheet C3.1. 11/29/05 - WW Comment still applicable. 9/28/05 - WW Show on Sheets C2.1, C3.1 and 1-1.1 all edges of pavement for open parking areas, including the existing parking area on the west side, being curbed. Provide wheel stops for the four parking spaces in the southwest side. Parks & Recs Condition Debbie Reid 562 -4818 11/17/2005 Open space /recreation impact fees are due prior to issuance of building permits or final plat (if Not Met applicable) whichever occurs first. These fees could be substantial and it is recommended that you contact Art Kader at 727 - 562 -4824 to calculate the assessment. Zoning Condition Wayne Wells, AICP 727 - 562 -4504 09/29/2005 1/16/06 - WW ' Not Met Insufficient justification is still provided regarding HOW redevelopment of the site is otherwise impracticable without deviations from the intensity and development standards. 12/21/05 - WW Just because there are three front setbacks to be met, doesn't justify why the setback reductions are being requested. Inadequate justification is provided. Revise. 11/29/05 - WW Comment is still applicable. Potentially the site is being overbuilt if significant deviations are being requested, especially required parking. 9/29/05 - WW Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria #1 response: Provide the justification as to HOW this proposal is "otherwise impractical without deviations from the use, intensity and development standards." Be specific. 09/28/2005 1/16/06 - WW Not Met Include as a condition of approval. 12/21/05 - WW Include in the "Description of Request" a statement(s) regarding the concierge service in the one "office" area as to what services will be provided. Any approval of this request will be conditioned on this "office" area being restricted in use to be solely accessory to the dwellings and no occupational license as a separate office will be issued. CaseConditons Print Date: 02/10/2006 Page 1 of 2. FLD2005 -07071 678 S GULFVIEW BLVD Zoning Condition Wayne Wells, AICP 727 - 562 -4504 11/29/05 - WW Unclear why a "management office" is necessary for 27 condos. Other projects of similar or larger number of units have not provided such an "office." Provide greater details and justification for such "management office." Alternately, remove such office. 9/28/05 - WW Site and building plans indicate an "office" next to the "shop" with a "storage" area to the rear of the "shop." Unclear what this "office" is for, since it doesn't have any clear access to it. If for the condos, still unclear why such is necessary, since there is a "clubhouse" on the ground level and a "gameroom" and "fitness center" on the second floor. Advise /revise. 09/28/2005 Potential condition of approval: Not Met That any future freestanding sign be a monument -style sign and be designed to match the exterior materials and color of the building. The maximum height shall be four feet, unless approved at six feet high through a Comprehensive Sign Program; 09/28/2005 JPotential condition of approval: Not Met That all Parks and Recreation fees be paid prior to the issuance of any permits; 09/28/2005 f Potential condition of approval: Not Met That a condominium plat be recorded prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy; 09/28/2005 Potential condition of approval: Not Met That all proposed utilities (from the right -of -way to the proposed building) be placed underground. Conduits for the future undergrounding of existing utilities within the abutting right -of -way shall be installed along the entire site's street frontages prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. The applicant's representative shall coordinate the size and number of conduits with all affected utility providers (electric, phone, cable, etc.), with the exact location, size and number of conduits to be approved by the applicant's engineer and the City's Engineering Department prior to the commencement of work; 09/28/2005 Potential condition of approval: Not Met That all Fire Department requirements be met prior to the issuance of any permits; 09/28/2005 Potential condition of approval: Not Met That any future storage units on the ground floor be used for storage only, in compliance with all Federal Emergency Management Administration (FEMA) rules and guidelines. Should such storage units be proposed and approved by Staff as a Minor Revision to this approval, evidence of this restriction of use, embodied in condominium documents, homeowner's documents, deed restrictions or like forms, shall be submitted to the Building Official prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy; 09/28/2005 / Potential condition of approval: Not Met J That a Unity of Title be recorded in the public records prior to the issuance of any permits; 09/28/2005 Potential condition of approval: Not Met That the final design and color of the building be consistent with the conceptual elevations submitted to, or as modified by, the CDB; 09/29/2005 J Potential condition of approval: Not Met That, prior to the issuance of any permits, a Minor Lot Adjustment be approved and recorded in the public records; Print Date: 02/10/2006 Page 2 of 2 CaseConditons 0 0 Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Monday, January 23, 2006 11:01 AM To: Brown, Shelby Subject: 678 S. Gulfview Blvd. Shelby - The Flexible Development application for this address is scheduled for review and decision by the Community Development Board (CDB) on February 21, 2006 (FLD2005- 07071). I will let you know of the CDB decision when they make it. Wayne 0 Wells, Wayne • From: Albee, Rick Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2006 2:28 PM To: Watkins, Sherry; DRC Members; Gluski, Roberta; Hufford, Diane; Reid, Debbie; 'Tracy Harmon'; US Post Office (E -mail) Subject: RE: resubmittals for the Feb 21, 2006 CDB meeting 1415 MLK -One condition required prior to building permit. 706 Bayway- No issues. 150 Brightwater- No issues. 678 Gulfview- Conditions modified and MET. - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Watkins, Sherry Sent: Wednesday, January 11, 2006 1:08 PM To: DRC Members; Gluski, Roberta; Hufford, Diane; Reid, Debbie; Tracy Harmon; US Post Office (E -mail) Subject: resubmittals for the Feb 21, 2006 CDB meeting DRC Members, Plans for the following cases have been resubmitted for the Feb 21, 2006 CDB meeting: FLD2005 -11112 1415 S Martin Luther King Planner John FLD2005 -11110 706 Bayway Blvd Planner Wayne FLD2005 -11109 150 Brightwater _ Planner Wayne FLD2005 -07071 678 S Gulfview Blvd Planner Wayne I have placed one copy of the case resubmittal package on the cabinets outside of Room 216 in our office for your review (please do not take it, as we need it for the CDB mail out). Please review your comments /conditions for this case in Permit Plan and determine if they are met. Whether the conditions are "met" or still "not met," please affirm to me via email. Please have these cases reviewed, if possible by 4:00 pm on Friday January 13, 2006. Sherry L Watkins Planning Department Administrative Analyst (727) 562 -4582 sherry. watkins @myclearwater. coin • � Page 1 of 1 Wells, Wayne From: Doreen Williams [ Doreen @northsideengineering.com] Sent: Thursday, January 12, 2006 8:54 AM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: RE: Playa Del Sol Thanks - will do From: Wayne.Wells @myClearwater.com [ mailto :Wayne.Wells @myClearwater.com] Sent: Thursday, January 12, 2006 8:52 AM To: Doreen Williams Subject: RE: Playa Del Sol To my knowledge only Engineering has reviewed. I have not reviewed the resubmittal, as well as there may be others. Don't print yet. However, ensure that the changes made to the drawings will be acceptable (when submitted) to Engineering (Scott Rice). - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Doreen Williams [mailto: Doreen @northsideengineering.com] Sent: Thursday, January 12, 2006 8:50 AM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: Playa Del Sol Good morning. Are you expecting any more comments coming on the above? I don't want to print 15 sets and then another 15 sets if something else come in. Thanks Doreen El Doreen A. Williams Project Director Northside Engineering Services, Inc. 601 Cleveland Street, Suite 930 Clearwater, FL 33755 Phone: 727 - 443 -2869 / Fax: 446 -8036 / Cell: 235 -8474 Email: doreen northsideengineering com 1/12/2006 0 0 Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Wednesday, January 11, 2006 4:54 PM To: 'Doreen Williams' Subject: RE: FLD2OO5 -07071 - 678 S Gulfview yes; yes - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Doreen Williams [mailto: Doreen @northsideengineering.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 11, 2006 3:14 PM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: RE: FLD2005 -07071 - 678 S Gulfview Bah!!!! Don't you close at 2:30 today? I will revise and resubmit in the morning if this is ok - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Wayne.Wells @myClearwater.com [ mailto :Wayne.Wells @myClearwater.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 11, 2006 2:58 PM To: Doreen Williams Cc: Renee Ruggiero Subject: FW: FLD2005 -07071 - 678 S Gulfview Need to address ASAP to stay on track. • - - - -- Original Message - - - -- • From: Rice, Scott • Sent: Wednesday, January 11, 2006 2:40 PM • To: Wells, Wayne; Watkins, Sherry • Cc: Elbo, Bennett • Subject: FLD2005 -07071 - 678 S Gulfview > > Wayne, > Revised parking access has resulted in a problem with the accessible route: > TRAFFIC > 6. WITH NEW PARKING LAYOUT, ACCESSIBLE ROUTE FROM HANDICAP PARKING SPACE ON FIRST FLOOR TO ELEVATOR FORCES USER TO SHARE ROUTE WITH VEHICLES. REVISE TO PROVIDE FOR SAFETY OF ACCESSIBLE ROUTE USER. > Also, the fire flow calculations have not been resolved. > D. Scott Rice > Land Devel. Engr. Manager > 727 - 562 -4781 > scott.rice @MyClearwater.com 1 Wells, Wayne From: Rice, Scott Sent: Wednesday, January 11, 2006 2:40 PM To: Wells, Wayne; Watkins, Sherry Cc: Elbo, Bennett Subject: FLD2005 -07071 - 678 S Gulfview Wayne, Revised parking access has resulted in a problem with the accessible route: TRAFFIC 6. WITH NEW PARKING LAYOUT, ACCESSIBLE ROUTE FROM HANDICAP PARKING SPACE ON FIRST FLOOR TO ELEVATOR FORCES USER TO SHARE ROUTE WITH VEHICLES. REVISE TO PROVIDE FOR SAFETY OF ACCESSIBLE ROUTE USER. Also, the fire flow calculations have not been resolved. D. Scott Rice Land DeveL Engr. Manager 727 -562 -4781 scott.rice@MyClearwater.com • Wells, Wayne • From: Watkins, Sherry Sent: Wednesday, January 11, 2006 1:08 PM To: DRC Members; Gluski, Roberta; Hufford, Diane; Reid, Debbie; Tracy Harmon; US Post Office (E -mail) Subject: resubmittals for the Feb 21, 2006 CDB meeting DRC Members, Plans for the following cases have been resubmitted for the Feb 21, 2006 CDB meeting: FLD2005 -11112 1415 S Martin Luther King Planner John FLD2005 -11110 706 Bayway Blvd Planner Wayne FLD2005- 1 11 09 150 Brightwater Planner Wayne FLD2005 -07071 678 S Gulfview Blvd Planner Wayne I have placed one copy of the case resubmittal package on the cabinets outside of Room 216 in our office for your review (please do not take it, as we need it for the CDB mail out). Please review your comments /conditions for this case in Permit Plan and determine if they are met. Whether the conditions are "met" or still "not met," please affirm to me via email. Please have these cases reviewed, if possible by 4:00 pm on Friday January 13, 2006. Sherry L Watkins Planning Department Ad-ministrative Analyst (727) 562 -4582 shemj.watkins@mycleat7vater.com • Wells, Wayne From: Rickard, Leonard Sent: Tuesday, January 10, 2006 7:46 AM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: RE: FLD2005- 08090, 693 -699 Bay Esplanade • Wayne, According to Chief Strong and Rob Fahey I can release 693 -699 Bay Esplanade and I have cleared it in the computer. Also bcp2005 -07071 at 678 S Gulfview Blvd is being released after Rob's consultation with Jeffrey from Northside and an agreement has been made to tap into a 16" line for the water supply for this project. - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Friday, December 30, 2005 12:06 PM To: Rickard, Leonard Subject: RE: FLD2005- 08090, 693 -699 Bay Esplanade Thanks. Just needed to know, so that I can appropriately deal with the case for the January 17th CDB agenda. Looks like they will need to be continued to the February meeting of the CDB. - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Rickard, Leonard Sent: Friday, December 30, 2005 8:45 AM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: RE: FLD2005- 08090, 693 -699 Bay Esplanade Wayne, No we have not received the calculations as of today. _I have not heard from them. - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Thursday, December 29, 2005 7:35 PM To: Rickard, Leonard , Subject: FLD2005- 08090, 693-699 Bay Esplanade Lenny - The above case was continued from the November 15th and December 20th Community Development Board (CDB) meetings to the January 17, 2006, CDB meeting. Has the Fire Department received Fire Flow calculations for this project that are acceptable to the Fire Department? Let me know as soon as possible, as I am trying to prepare documents for the January 17, 2006, CDB agenda. Thanks. Wayne • • 12/22/05 Mixed Use Calculation for Playa Del Sol Property — 678 South Gulfview Boulevard A. Property is zoned Tourist District (maximum FAR = 1.0 and maximum density = 30 du /acre) 1. Permitted FAR ...................................... ............................1.0 2. Multiply #A1 by bldg sq. ftg. of retail & restaurant proposed...........x 4;29* sf 17 107 3. Lot area required to support #A2 in the building .........................= 4-,-29+sf 37 6 4. Lot area ......................................... ............................... 47,215 sf 5. Subtract the lot area required to support p non- residential use in the building ( #A3) ..... ............................... sf I?%,7 3 sit 6. Lot area (sf) to calculate the maximum number of dwelling units ....= 4 2;921 sf 43 4� 7. Divide #A6 ...................................... ............................... 42-,92t sf43 Jr+ 8. Land area in an acre ......................................................... 43,560 sf 000 9. Lot acreage for residential portion ............ .............................. = 0:98§ acres 0. g 17 10. Multiply #A9 ....... ............................... ...........................048.5 acres 0. g 7 11. Maximum density ... .....................x 30 du/acre 30 12. Maximum number of dwelling units permitted ........................ = 29 du B. Maximum Development Potential for Property 1. Existing Overnight Accommodation Rooms/Units (OVA) to remain... 4 rooms 3 2. Conversion of OVA in #Blto dwelling units (40/30 rule) ................ 3 du 3. Maximum number of dwelling units (# Al2 ) ............................. 29 du 4. Subtract converted OVA to remain ( #B2) from #B3 ........................3 du 2,7 5. Maximum # of dwelling units ............................................... = 26 du 12/22/05 Mixed Use Calculation for Playa Del Sol Property — 678 South Gulfview Boulevard A. Property is zoned Tourist District (maximum FAR = 1.0 and maximum density = 30 du /acre) 1. Permitted FAR .................. ............................... ...............1.0 2. Multiply #A1 by bldg sq. ftg. of retail & restaurant proposed...........x 4,294 sf 3. Lot area required to support #A2 in the building .........................= 4,294 sf 4. Lot area ......................................... ............................... 47,215 sf 5. Subtract the lot area required to support non - residential use in the building ( #A3) ..... ............................... 4,294 sf 6. Lot area (sf) to calculate the maximum number of dwelling units ....= 42,921 sf 7. Divide #A6 ...................................... ............................... 42,921 sf 8. Land area in an acre .......................... ................ • • • • • ........ 43,560 sf 9. Lot acreage for residential portion ............ .............................. = 0.985 acres 10. Multiply #A9 .................................. ............................... 0.985 acres 11. Maximum density .... ............................... .....................x 30 du/acre 12. Maximum number of dwelling units permitted ........................ = 29 du B. Maximum Development Potential for Property 1. Existing Overnight Accommodation Rooms/Units (OVA) to remain... 4 rooms 2. Conversion of OVA in #B1to dwelling units (40/30 rule) ................ 3 du 3. Maximum number of dwelling units (# Al2 ) ............................. 29 du 4. Subtract converted OVA to remain ( #B2) from #B3 ........................3 du 5. Maximum # of dwelling units .............................................. = 26 du Wells, Wayne From: Elbo, Bennett Sent: Tuesday, December 20, 2005 11:21 AM To: Rice, Scott; Wells, Wayne Subject: RE: FLD2005 -07071 - 678 S Gulfview concur with Scott. Thanks Bennett Elbo City of Clearwater Traffic Operations Division Phone: (727)562-4775 Fax: (727)562-4755 bennett.elbo @myclearwater.com - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Rice, Scott Sent: Tuesday, December 20, 2005 10:04 AM To: Wells, Wayne Cc: Elbo, Bennett Subject: RE: FLD2005 -07071 - 678 S Gulfview Wayne, The letter and narrative dated 12/15/05 for the subject application have been reviewed with Traffic Operations. Comment #3 - The response regarding sight triangles is acceptable except at the two adjacent driveways as noted below. Comment #4 - The two driveways are in conflict with Sections 3 -102 and 3- 1402.B. of the Community Development Code and are not acceptable. With the proposed arrangement, additional conflict points are created in the public right - of way. Also, full sight distances do not exist between motorists using the two adjacent driveways. As this is new construction, creating these conflicts within the public right -of -way is not warranted. A simple solution is to connect the two areas of first floor parking through the center of the building and eliminating the westernmost driveway on Bayway. Comment #5 - Redesign to address Comment #4 may resolve this issue, however, with the maneuvers necessary to use these parallel parking spaces occurring near the throat of the driveway, these spaces have the potential to affect the public right -of way and are not acceptable. D. Scott Rice Land DeveL Engr. Manager 727 -562 -4781 scott.rice@MyClearwater.com - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Rice, Scott Sent: Wednesday, December 14, 2005 11:07 AM To: Wells, Wayne Cc: Elbo, Bennett Subject: FLD2005 -07071 678 S Gulfview Wayne, There are unresolved traffic issues on this case: TRAFFIC COMMENTS 3. Objects inside sight distance triangles must not exceed the City's vertical height limitations. (City's Community Development Code, Section 3 -904) 12/14/05 - OBJECTS EXIST WITHIN SIGHT TRIANGLES. WHAT PROVISIONS WILL BE MADE TO PROVIDE FOR PEDESTRIAN AND VEHICULAR SAFETY? 4. The two driveways along N. Bayway Blvd. do not meet the City's 125' minimum driveway separation for access management (Community Development Code Section 3- 102.). 12/14/05 - NOT MET 5. Demonstrate how a parked motorist can exit from the parallel parking spaces located along the west side of the westernmost driveway. 12/14/05 - NOT MET D. Scott Rice Land Devel. Engr. Manager 727 -562 -4781 scott.rice@MyClearwater.com Wells, Wayne From: Rice, Scott Sent: Tuesday, December 20, 2005 10:04 AM To: Wells, Wayne Cc: Elbo, Bennett Subject: RE: FLD2005 -07071 - 678 S Gulfview Wayne, The letter and narrative dated 12/15/05 for the subject application have been reviewed with Traffic Operations. Comment #3 - The response regarding sight triangles is acceptable except at the two adjacent driveways as noted below. Comment #4 - The two driveways are in conflict with Sections 3 -102 and 3- 1402.B. of the Community Development Code and are not acceptable. With the proposed arrangement, additional conflict points are created in the public right -of way. Also, full sight distances do not exist between motorists using the two adjacent driveways. As this is new construction, creating these conflicts within the public right -of -way is not warranted. A simple solution is to connect the two areas of first floor parking through the center of the building and eliminating the westernmost driveway on Bayway. Comment #5 - Redesign to address Comment #4 may resolve this issue, however, with the maneuvers necessary to use these parallel parking spaces occurring near the throat of the driveway, these spaces have the potential to affect the public right -of way and are not acceptable. D. Scott Rice Land DeveL Engr. Manager 727 - 562 -4781 scott.rice@MyClearwater.com - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Rice, Scott Sent: Wednesday, December 14, 2005 11:07 AM To: Wells, Wayne Cc: Elbo, Bennett Subject: FLD2005 -07071 - 678 S Gulfview Wayne, There are unresolved traffic issues on this case: TRAFFIC COMMENTS 3. Objects inside sight distance triangles must not exceed the City's vertical height limitations. (City's Community Development Code, Section 3 -904) 12/14/05 - OBJECTS EXIST WITHIN SIGHT TRIANGLES. WHAT PROVISIONS WILL BE MADE TO PROVIDE FOR PEDESTRIAN AND VEHICULAR SAFETY? 4. The two driveways along N. Bayway Blvd. do not meet the City's 125' minimum driveway separation for access management (Community Development Code Section 3- 102.). 12/14/05 - NOT MET 5. Demonstrate how a parked motorist can exit from the parallel parking spaces located along the west side of the westernmost driveway. 12/14/05 - NOT MET D. Scott Rice Land DeveL Engr. Manager 727 -562 -4781 scott.rice@MyClearwater.com 1. 0 0 Wells, Wayne From: Albee, Rick Sent: Friday, December 16, 2005 1:50 PM To: Watkins, Sherry; DRC Members; Gluski, Roberta; Hufford, Diane; 'Tracy Harmon' Subject: RE: CDB REsubmittals for the January 17, 2005 Meeting 125/143 Island Way- No Issues 150 Brightwater- No Issues 400 Jones- No Issues 678 Gulfview- Revised comments to be met at building permit. - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Watkins, Sherry Sent: Tuesday, December 13, 2005 3:29 PM To: DRC Members; Gluski, Roberta; Hufford, Diane; Tracy Harmon Subject: CDB REsubmittals for the January 17, 2005 Meeting DRC Members, Plans for the following cases have been resubmitted for the January 17, 2006, CDB meeting FLD2005 -11106 125 & 143 Island Way Planner :Robert Tefft DVA2005- 00004A 2506 Countryside Planner: Mike Reynolds FLD2005 -11109 150 Brightwater Dr Planner Wayne Wells FLD2005 -08085 FLD2005 -07071 ANX2005 -10036 ANX2005 -10035 400 Jones Street 678 S Gulfview Blvd Planner: Robert Tefft Planner: Wayne Wells 2066 Mall Planner: Cky 3012 Grand View Ave Planner:Cky I have placed one copy of the cases resubmitted on the cabinets outside of Room 216 in our office for your review (please do not take it, as we need it for the CDB mail out). Please review your comments /conditions for these cases in Permit Plan and determine if they are met. Whether the conditions are "met" or still "not met," please affirm to the planner via email. Please have these cases reviewed, if possible by 9AM, Friday, December 16, 2005. Thank you, Sherry L Watkins Planning Department Administrative Analyst (727) 562-4582, sherry. wa tkins @m ycleaiwater. coin • Wells, Wayne • From: Rickard, Leonard Sent: Friday, December 16, 2005 7:55 AM To: Watkins, Sherry Cc: Wells, Wayne; Tefft, Robert; Reynolds, Mike Subject: RE: CDB Resubmittals for the January 17, 2005 Meeting FLD2005 -11106 125 & 143 Island Way Planner :Robert Tefft DVA2005- 00004A 2506 Countryside Planner: Mike Reynolds FLD2005 -11109 150 Brightwater Dr Planner Wayne Wells FLD2005 -08085 400 Jones Street Planner: Robert Tefft MET NO ISSUES NOT MET NOT MET FLD2005 -07071 678 S Gulfview Blvd Planner: Wayne Wells NOT MET ANX2005 -10036 2066 Mall Planner: Cky NO ISSUES ANX2005 -10035 3012 Grand View Ave Planner:Cky NO ISSUES 1 Wells, Wayne From: Reid, Debbie Sent: Thursday, December 15, 2005 1:52 PM To: - Reynolds, Mike; Wells, Wayne Subject: FW: CDB REsubmittals for the January 17, 2005 Meeting Mike and Wayne, please see notations below. There are two cases that have not yet met our requested changes. Debbie O - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Kader, Art Sent: Wednesday, December 14, 2005 12:46 AM To: Reid, Debbie Subject: FW: CDB REsubmittals for the January 17, 2005 Meeting fyi - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Watkins, Sherry Sent: Tuesday, December 13, 2005 3:29 PM To: DRC Members; Gluski, Roberta; Hufford, Diane; Tracy Harmon Subject: CDB REsubmittals for the January 17, 2005 Meeting DRC Members, Plans for the following cases have been resubmitted for the January 17, 2006, CDB meeting FLD2OO5 -11106 125& 143 Island Way Planner :Robert Tefft DVA2OO5- O0OO4A 2506 Countryside Planner: Mike Reynolds [Reid, Debbie] Mike, Art Kader had emailed you on December 6th regarding a change that needed to be made to the development agreement, per our Legal Dept. The agreement needs to address the payment of open space impact fees to protect the City. I don't see those changes on the agreement. If you need me to forward Art's email to you, please let me know. FLD2OO5 -11109 150 Brightwater Dr Planner Wayne Wells [Reid, Debbie] Wayne, we requested that the site data table on this project needed to be corrected to show the existing usage of the property, specifically if the 42 existing units are residential dwellings or hotel /motel units. That has not been changed /corrected yet and we will need to know that information in order to compute their fees. FLD2OO5 -08085 FLD2OO5 -07071 ANX2OO5 -10036 ANX2OO5 -10035 400 Jones Street 678 S Gulfview Blvd 2066 Mall Planner: Robert Tefft Planner: Wayne Wells Planner: Cky 3012 Grand View Ave Planner:Cky have placed one copy of the cases resubmitted on the cabinets outside of Room 216 in our office for your review (please do not take it, as we need it for the CDB mail out). Please review your comments /conditions for these cases in Permit Plan and determine if they are met. Whether the conditions are "met" or still "not met," please affirm to the planner via email. Please have these cases reviewed, if possible by 9AM, Friday, December 16, 2005. Thank you, Sherry L Watkins Planning Department Administrative Analyst (727) 562 -4582 sherry.watkins @m ycleanvater.corn Wells, Wayne From: Rice, Scott Sent: Wednesday, December 14, 2005 11:07 AM To: Wells, Wayne Cc: Elbo, Bennett Subject: FLD2005 -07071 - 678 S Gulfview Wayne, There are unresolved traffic issues on this case: TRAFFIC COMMENTS 3. Objects inside sight distance triangles must not exceed the City's vertical height limitations. (City's Community Development Code, Section 3 -904) 12/14/05 - OBJECTS EXIST WITHIN SIGHT TRIANGLES. WHAT PROVISIONS WILL BE MADE TO PROVIDE FOR PEDESTRIAN AND VEHICULAR SAFETY? 4. The two driveways along N. Bayway Blvd. do not meet the City's 125' minimum driveway separation for access management (Community Development Code Section 3- 102.). 12/14/05 - NOT MET 5. Demonstrate how a parked motorist can exit from the parallel parking spaces located along the west side of the westernmost driveway. 12/14/05 - NOT MET D. Scott Rice Land DeveL Engr. Manager 727 -562 -4781 scott.rice@MyCiearwater.com 0 Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Wednesday, December 14, 200511:11 AM To: Doreen Williams (E -mail) Cc: Renee Ruggiero (E- mail); Angel Haines (E -mail) Subject: FW: FLD2005 -07071 - 678 S Gulfview Doreen - Need to address by 9 am Friday, December 16, 2005. Thanks. Wayne - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Rice, Scott Sent: Wednesday, December 14, 2005 11:07 AM To: Wells, Wayne Cc: Elbo, Bennett Subject: FLD2005 -07071 - 678 S Gulfview Wayne, There are unresolved traffic issues on this case: TRAFFIC COMMENTS • 3. Objects inside sight distance triangles must not exceed the City's vertical height limitations. (City's Community Development Code, Section 3 -904) 12/14/05 - OBJECTS EXIST WITHIN SIGHT TRIANGLES. WHAT PROVISIONS WILL BE MADE TO PROVIDE FOR PEDESTRIAN AND VEHICULAR SAFETY? 4. The two driveways along N. Bayway Blvd. do not meet the City's 125' minimum driveway separation for access management (Community Development Code Section 3- 102.). 12/14/05 - NOT MET 5. Demonstrate how a parked motorist can exit from the parallel parking spaces located along the west side of the westernmost driveway. 12/14/05 - NOT MET D. Scott Rice Land Devel. Engr. Manager 727 -562 -4781 scott.rice@MyClearwater,com LI Wells, Wayne • From: Watkins, Sherry Sent: Tuesday, December 13, 2005 3:29 PM To: DRC Members; Gluski, Roberta; Hufford, Diane; Tracy Harmon Subject: CDB REsubmittals for the January 17, 2005 Meeting DRC Members, Plans for the following cases have been resubmitted for the January 17, 2006, CDB meeting FLD2005 -1 1 1 06 DVA2005- 00004A FLD2005 -1 1 1 09 FLD2005 -08085 FLD2005 -07071 ANX2005 -10036 ANX2005 -10035 125 & 143 Island Way Planner :Robert Tefft 2506 Countryside 150 Brightwater Dr 400 Jones Street 678 S Gulfview Blvd Planner: Mike Reynolds Planner Wayne Wells Planner: Robert Tefft Planner: Wayne Wells 2066 Mall Planner: Cky 3012 Grand View Ave Planner:Cky I have placed one copy of the cases resubmitted on the cabinets outside of Room 216 in our office for your review (please do not take it, as we need it for the CDB mail out). Please review your comments /conditions for these cases in Permit Plan and determine if they are met. Whether the conditions are "met" or still "not met," please affirm to the planner via email. Please have these cases reviewed, if possible by 9AM, Friday, December 16, 2005. Thank you, Sherry L Watkins Planning Department Administrative Analyst (727) 562 -4582 sherry. watkins @myclearwa ter. com • Wells, Wayne From: Glenn, Tom Sent: Thursday, December 08, 2005 6:55 AM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: RE: FLD2005- 07071, 678 S. Gulfview Blvd. In my notes I have them OK (Done) sorry for the confusion Tom Glenn Solid Waste Program Coordinator 727 - 562 -4930 cell 727 - 224 -7388 - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Wednesday, December 07, 2005 5:56 PM To: Glenn, Tom Subject: FLD2005- 07071, 678 S. Gulfview Blvd. Tom - • Don't know if you plan to attend DRC tomorrow (12/8/05), but regarding the above case, you do not have any conditions not met in Permit Plan (only comment appears to be checked met on 11/21/05), yet in activities" , you still have a "hold" on this case. Just checking to make sure you are (or not) okay with their proposal. Let me know before 2:20 pm. Thanks. Wayne • Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Wednesday, December 07, 2005 5:56 PM To: Glenn, Tom Subject: FLD2005- 07071, 678 S. Gulfview Blvd. Tom - • Don't know if you plan to attend DRC tomorrow (12/8/05), but regarding the above case, you do not have any "conditions" "not met" in Permit Plan (only comment appears to be checked "met" on 11/21/05), yet in "activities" you still have a "hold" on this case. Just checking to make sure you are (or not) okay with their proposal. Let me know before 2:20 pm. Thanks. Wayne 2:20 pm Case Number: - 7 71 -- 678 S GULFVIEW BLVD Owner(s): Sktel Inc. 678 S. Gulfview Blvd. Clearwater, F133767 TELEPHONE: 727 -543 -5599, FAX: 727 -528 -1437, E -MAIL: No Email Applicant Playa Del Sol Resort 678 S. Gulfview Blvd. Clearwater, F133767 TELEPHONE: 727 -543 -5599, FAX: 727 -528 -1437, E -MAIL: No Email Representative: Housh Ghovaee 601 Cleveland Street Clearwater, F133755 TELEPHONE: 727 - 443 -2869, FAX: 727 - 446 -8036, E -MAIL: renee @northsideengineering.com Location: 1.092 acres located between South Gulfview Boulevard and Bayway Boulevard on the west side of Parkway Drive. Atlas Page: 285A Zoning District: T, Tourist Request: Flexible Development approval to permit a mixed use (3,350 square feet of retail and restaurant floor area, 27 attached dwellings and four overnight accommodation rooms /units) with reductions to the front (north along Bayway Blvd) setback from 15 feet to 10 feet (to building), from 15 feet to xx feet (to existing pavement) and from 15 feet to 8.3 feet (to pavement), reductions to the front (east along Parkway Drive) setback from 15 feet to 10 feet (to building) and from 15 feet to zero feet (to trash staging area), reductions to the side (west) setback from 10 feet to five feet (to pool deck), from 10 feet to xx feet (to patio deck), from 10 feet to five feet (to pavement) and from 10 feet to zero feet (to existing pavement and sidewalk), reductions to the side (south) setback from 10 feet to xx feet (to building), from 10 feet to zero feet (to existing sidewalk) and from 10 feet to xx feet (to pavement), a reduction to the side (east) setback from 10 feet to five feet (to pool deck), an increase to building height from 35 feet to 89.5 feet (to roof deck) with an additional 5.67 feet for perimeter parapets (from roof deck) and a reduction to required parking for the proposed restaurant from 38 spaces (15 spaces /1,000 square feet) to 28 spaces (xx spaces /1,000 square feet), as a Comprehensive Infili Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2- 803.C. Proposed Use: Mixed use Development Review Agenda - Thursday, December 8, 2005 - Page 36 Neighborhood Clearwater Beach Association Association(s): Clearwater, Fl 33767 100 Devon Dr TELEPHONE: 443 -2168, FAX: No Fax, E -MAIL: papamurphy @aol.com Neighborhood Clearwater Neighborhoods Coalition Association(s): Clearwater, Fl 33758 P O Box 8204 TELEPHONE: 727 - 725 -3345, FAX: No Fax, E -MAIL: Djw @gte.net Neighborhood Clearwater Point 1 Beach House 16 Association(s): Clearwater, F133767 845 Bayway Blvd TELEPHONE: 535 -2424, FAX: No Fax, E -MAIL: No Email Neighborhood Clearwater Point 3 Marina House 17 Association(s): Clearwater, Fl 33767 868 Bayway Blvd #212 TELEPHONE: No Phone, FAX: No Fax, E -MAIL: No Email Neighborhood Clearwater Point 4 Island House 1 Association(s): Clearwater, Fl 33767 895 S Gulfview Blvd TELEPHONE: 530 -4517, FAX: No Fax, E -MAIL: No Email Neighborhood Clearwater Point 5 Admiral House 19 Association(s): Clearwater, Fl 33767 825 S Gulfview Blvd #104 TELEPHONE: 447 -0290, FAX: No Fax, E -MAIL: No Email Neighborhood Clearwater Point 7 Inc, Yacht House Association(s): Clearwater, F133767 851 Bayway Blvd TELEPHONE: 727 -441 -8212, FAX: No Fax, E -MAIL: cpoint7 @knology.net Neighborhood Clearwater Point 8 Shipmaster, Sail Association(s): Clearwater, F133767 800 S Gulfview Blvd TELEPHONE: 727 - 442 -0664, FAX: No Fax, E -MAIL: clwpt8 @tampabay.rr.com Presenter: Wayne Wells, Planner III Attendees Included: City Staff. 12/8/05 - Wells, Thompson, Rice, Rickart, Albee; 9/29/05 - Wells, Thompson, Rice, Rickart, Keller, Buzzell, Albee Applicant/Rep: 12/8/05 - Williams, Ruggerio, Fowler; 9/29/05 - Doreen Williams, Renee Ruggiero, Steve Fowler The DRC reviewed this application with the following comments: General Engineering: Development Review Agenda - Thursday, December 8, 2005 - Page 37 • 1. Fire Department Connection (F.D.C.) shall be installed at least 15 feet from the face of the building. NOT MET: Resubmitted sheets C3.1 nor C4.1 do not specify 15 ft. requirement. Add note to drawing or provide dimension. 2. F.D.C. shall be located no more that 40 feet from a fire hydrant. NOT MET: Resubmitted sheets C3.1 nor C4.1 do not specify 40 ft.maximum distance requirement. Provide dimension or note on detail sheet specifying the FDC shall be located no more than 40 ft. maximum distance requirement. 3. Show private sanitary sewer main that exists on the proposed site. What does the main service and will it be maintained? NOT MET: City sanitary atlas shows a private 8 -inch sewer line and manhole entering subject property from the west. 4. Show water and sewer service lines to existing 3 -story building. All of the above to be addressed prior to CDB. The following to be addressed prior to building permit: 1. All fire hydrant assemblies installed greater than 10 ft. from a water main shall be constructed with ductile iron pipe and shall have a gate valve at the tee on the branch line, and at the fire hydrant assembly (F.H.A.). NOT MET: Gate valves are not shown. Prior to CO: 1. Condo plat shall be recorded with Pinellas County. General Note: If the proposed project necessitates infrastructure modifications to satisfy site - specific water capacity and pressure requirements and/or wastewater capacity requirements, the modifications shall be completed by the applicant and at their expense. If underground water mains and hydrants are to be installed, the installation shall be completed and in service prior to construction in accordance with Fire Department requirements. General Note: DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review, additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. Environmental: 1 . 1. Indicate on plans direction of runoff flow from site (specifically the parking lot). Recommendation: Trench drain at the east entrance of parking lot would provide pathway to inlet. All of the above to be addressed prior to CDB. Fire: 1 . Provide Fire Flow Calculations / Water Study by a FIRE PROTECTION ENGINEER to assure an adequate water supply is available and to determine if any upgrades are required by the developer due to the impact of this project. Calculations / Water Study due PRIOR TO CDB. 2. Is three story building to be sprinklered. Does building meet the exceptions allowed by NFPA 101, 28.3.5.2? Answer PRIOR TO CDB Harbor Master: 1 . No issues. Legal: l . No issues. Land Resources: 1 . Show the oak trees west of the proposed parking lot to be preserved prior to CDB. 2. Show trees # 1,2,6,7 and 8 to be preserved. Relocate ALL utilities from under their canopies prior to CDB. 3 . Provide a Tree Preservation Plan prepared by a certified arborist, consulting arborist, landscape architect or other specialist in the field of arboriculture. This plan must show how the proposed building, parking, stormwater and utilities impact the critical root zones (drip lines) of trees to be preserved and how you propose to address these impacts ie; crown elevating, building lintels, root pruning and/or root aeration systems. Other data required on this plan must show the trees canopy line, actual tree barricade limits (2/3 of the drip line and/or in the root prune lines if required), and the tree barricade detail. And any other pertinent information the arborist feels relates to tree preservation. Provide prior to building permit. 4. Show ALL trees with their canopies on ALL civil and landscape plans prior to CDB. Landscaping: Development Review Agenda - Thursday, December 8, 2005 - Page 38 1 , 11/29/05 - WW • 0 Comment still applicable, as there are existing trees indicated on photographs from a site visit that are not shown on the plans nor indicated as to being preserved or to be removed (such as west of the westernmost building - east of Walgreens, adjacent to Parkway Drive and south of easternmost building - north of Subway). 9/28/05 - WW Show on the civil and landscape plans all existing trees, with an indication as to whether they are being retained/preserved or being removed. 2. 11/29/05 - WW Comment still applicable. 9/28/05 - WW Sheet L1.1 - Revise Landscaping Note #8, as required trees must be a minimum of 10 -foot tall and 2.5 -inch caliper at time of planting. 3 . 11/29/05 - WW Comment is still applicable. In some areas only two palms are shown to be planted (north and east of proposed building) and insufficient numbers south of existing to remain overnight accommodation building. 9/28/05 - WW Ensure that the number of trees for the foundation landscape area are being met per Section 3- 1202.E.2 (at least two accent trees (or palm equivalents) or three palms for every 40 linear feet of building facade). 4. 11/29/05 - WW Comment still applicable. 9/28/05 - WW Show on Sheets C2.1, C3.1 and L1.1 all edges of pavement for open parking areas, including the existing parking area on the west side, being curbed. Provide wheel stops for the four parking spaces in the southwest side. 5 , Revise Sheet L1.1 - a) Revise the quantities in the Landscape Table, as only the SB and SP numbers are correct; b) There are also 85 PP indicated on the landscape plan not indicated in the Table; and c) Between the existing to remain overnight accommodation use building and the retail building to the west there are 2 WR indicated with the indicator line on the retail lot (not the subject lot) and no symbols shown. 6. Sheet Ll. I - Coordinate the location of proposed trees with the canopy of existing trees to remain. Some proposed trees are shown to be planted under the canopy of existing trees to remain. Revise. 7. Site data table on Sheet C 1.1 indicates 6,173 square feet of proposed paved vehicular use area (VUA). Interior landscaping required at ten percent of the VUA is 617 square feet. Site data table also indicates 844 square feet of proposed interior landscaping, yet is indicated at only 1.98 percent (should be 13.67 percent ?). Revise percentage. Parks and Recreation: 1 . Open space /recreation impact fees are due, prior to issuance of building permits or final plat (if applicable) whichever occurs first. These fees could be-substantial and it is recommended that you contact Art Kader at 727 -562 -4824 to calculate the assessment. Stormwater: 1 . 1. Downspouts from existing building to the south of the project discharge into depression. between properties. How will this runoff be handled with the proposed construction? The above to be addressed prior to CDB. Prior to issuance of a building permit: 1) The applicant is to provide a copy of the approved SWFWMD permit for the proposed project. 2) Show that all proposed runoff is entering into the stormwater vault. Solid Waste: No Comments Traffic Engineering: Development Review Agenda - Thursday, December 8, 2005 - Page 39 Planning: 0 0 1. Handicap parking spaces must meet the minimum vertical clear height of 8 feet 2 inches (8' 2 ") including entrance, route, parking space and exit per Florida Building Code. 2. Florida Building Code Section 406.2.2 requires a minimum 7 -foot clear height in parking garages. Will parking spaces under ramps meet this requirement? 3. Objects inside sight distance triangles must not exceed the City's vertical height limitations. (City's Community Development Code, Section 3 -904) 4. The two driveways along N. Bayway Blvd. do not meet the City's 125' minimum driveway separation for access management. 5. Demonstrate how a parked motorist can exit out of the parallel parking space(s). All of the above to be addressed prior to CDB. General note: Comply with the current Transportation Impact Fee Ordinance and fee schedule. Development Review Agenda - Thursday, December 8, 2005 - Page 40 • 1 . 11/29/05 - WW Comment is still applicable. 9/28/05 & 9/2/05 - WW Depict by shading or crosshatching all required parking lot interior landscaped areas and include the square footages of all areas being counted toward the interior landscaping. 2. 11/29/05 - WW Comment still applicable. Alternately, provide a rooftop plan. 9/2/05 - WW Indicate on the building elevations that the outdoor mechanical units are proposed on the roof. Indicate screening materials. 3 . 11/29/05 - WW Comment is still applicable. Signage must be shown at least in concept as indicated below to review relationship to other site improvements, including landscaping, and to building design. 9/28/05 & 9/2/05 & 7/9/05 - WW Show at least in concept all proposed freestanding and attached signs; showing on Sheets C2.1, C3.1 and L 1.1 the location and setback from property lines of proposed freestanding signage and on the building elevations the location of proposed attached signage. Details may come later through the building permit review process or through the submission of a Comprehensive Sign Program application. Also address existing signage, which will be required to be brought into conformance with Code requirements (provide at least photographs of existing signage). 4. 11/29/05 - WW Comment is still applicable. Potentially the site is being overbuilt if significant deviations are being requested, especially required parking. 9/29/05 - WW Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria #1 response: Provide the justification as to HOW this proposal is 'otherwise impractical without deviations from the use, intensity and development standards." Be specific. 5 . 11/29/05 - WW Comment is still applicable. Unclear what type of restarant is proposed, since this location is not on the main street (S. Gulfview Blvd). Remove last sentence. 9/29/05 - WW Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria #9 response: The proposal represents a parking reduction for the restaurant, yet no Parking Demand Study has been submitted justifying the proposed reduction. 6. 11/29/05 - WW Comment is still applicable. 9/29/05 - WW General Applicability criteria #1 response: Correct the directions of surrounding development. Additionally, most of the townhomes are 31 feet to the midroof point and the condos at 692 Bayway is 42 feet to the roof deck. Provide more detailed information as to HOW this proposal is "in harmony with the scale; bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties." 7. 11/29/05 - WW Comment is still applicable. No parking study justifying the parking reduction request has been submitted for review. 9/28/05 - WW Parking for the restaurant is required at 15 spaces per 1,000 square feet. For a 2,500 square -foot restaurant, 38 parking spaces are required. The proposal indicates that only 18 spaces, or seven spaces per 1,000 square feet, are being provided. No parking demand study has been submitted justifying the proposed reduction to required parking for the restaurant/site. Based on the proposed uses, and since two parking spaces are assigned to the Clearwater Beach Resort proposal (FLD2005- 09092), 86 spaces are required to be provided (five for retail; 38 for restaurant; 41 for residential; two for overnight accommodation). Only 77 spaces are provided. Revise the proposal and/or submit a parking demand study for any reduction. Prior to the submittal of the study, the methodology of such study shall be approved by the Community Development Coordinator and shall be in accordance with accepted traffic engineering principles. The findings of the study will be used in determining whether or not deviations to the parking standards are approved. Development Review Agenda - Thursday, December 8, 2005 - Page 41 i • B . 11/29/05 - WW a) Sidewalk for the adjacent retail building must be retained and placed within an easement (if not presently). Plans are not too clear as to what pavement/concrete is being removed/retained in the area of the northwest corner of the adjacent retail building. b) Drive aisle between these four spaces has not been reduced as indicated, as well as the dimension line has been eliminated from the plans (replace on plans). 9/28/05 - WW The four 90- degree parking spaces south of the retention vault encroach onto the required sidewalk at the rear of the adjacent retail building and the drive aisle between the spaces at 32 feet is excessive. Revise to eliminate the encroachment and reduce the drive aisle width. 9 . 11/29/05 - WW Provide on the west elevation on Sheet A -2.2 the dimension for the proposed height (vertical clearance) for the northernmost parking space under the ramp (shortest dimension on the north side of the space). Additionally, the west elevation indicates the ramp to extend at least three feet north of the columns, yet the grading plan Sheet C4.1 does not provide proposed grades for this ramp. Revise. 9/28/05 - WW The site design indicates three proposed parking spaces tucked under the ramp up to the second floor parking level. Provide details as to vertical clearance for these vehicles through cross - sections and also show on the west side elevation, which does not acknowledge these parking spaces tucked under the ramp. 10. 11/29/05 - WW Unclear why a "management office" is necessary for 27 condos. Other projects of similar or larger number of units have not provided such an "office." Provide greater details and justification for such "management office." Alternately, remove such office. 9/28/05 - WW Site and building plans indicate an "office" next to the "shop" with a "storage" area to the rear of the "shop." Unclear what this "office" is for, since it doesn't have any clear access to it. If for the condos, still unclear why such is necessary, since there is a "clubhouse" on the ground level and a "gameroom" and "fitness center" on the second floor. Advise /revise. 11 . Potential condition of approval: That any future freestanding sign be a monument -style sign and be designed to match the exterior materials and color of the building. The maximum height shall be four feet, unless approved at six feet high through a Comprehensive Sign Program; 12. Potential condition of approval: That all Parks and Recreation fees be paid prior to the issuance of any permits; 13 . Potential condition of approval: That a condominium plat be recorded prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy; 14. Potential condition of approval: That all proposed utilities (from the right -of -way to the proposed building) be placed underground. Conduits for the future undergrounding of existing utilities within the abutting right -of -way shall be installed along the entire site's street frontages prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. The applicant's representative shall coordinate the size and number of conduits with all affected utility providers (electric, phone, cable, etc.), with the exact location, size and number of conduits to be approved by the applicant's engineer and the City's Engineering Department prior to the commencement of work; 15 . 11/30/05 - WW Provide a dimension line from BFE to the highest roof deck for the new building. 9/28/05 & 9/2/05 & 7/9/05 - WW Indicate on the building elevations the height of the building from BFE to the highest roof deck (not ceiling), as well as the height of the parapet from the roof deck of the highest roof deck. Ensure these heights are indicated in the site data table on Sheet C1.1. 16. Potential condition of approval: That all Fire Department requirements be met prior to the issuance of any permits; 17. Potential condition of approval: That any future storage units on the ground floor be used for storage only, in compliance with all Federal Emergency Management Administration (FEMA) rules and guidelines. Should such storage units be proposed and approved by Staff as a Minor Revision to this approval, evidence of this restriction of use, embodied in condominium documents, homeowner's documents, deed restrictions or like forms, shall be submitted to the Building Official prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy; Development Review Agenda - Thursday, December 8, 2005 -Page 42 i • 18 . Potential condition of approval: That a Unity of Title be recorded in the public records prior to the issuance of any permits; 19. Potential condition of approval: That the final design and color of the building be consistent with the conceptual elevations submitted to, or as modified by, the CDB; 20. 11/30/05 - WW Response dated 10/4/05 states that the two spaces for the overnight accommodation use will remain on the Walgreens site, with the two other spaces required for the overnight accommodation use to be provided on -site. Indicate on Sheet C3.1 the location of the two spaces on the Walgreen site and the two on -site parking spaces dedicated for the overnight accommodation use. Still a question of how visitors will access the overnight accommodation building from these four parking spaces. 9/28/05 - WW It is my understanding that, as part of this proposal, two of the existing parking spaces that are accessed from the drive aisle adjacent to Walgreens are to be removed and will be reoriented to be accessed from the proposed northern driveway for this mixed use project. These two spaces, which are required parking for the overnight accommodation use (FLD2005- 09092), are to be located in the northwest corner of this site. Clarify. Also, if the above is correct, how will the overnight accommodation guests access their units from these parking spaces? 21 . Potential condition of approval: That, prior to the issuance of any permits, a Minor Lot Adjustment be approved and recorded in the public records; 22. 11/30/05 - WW Comment is still applicable. The site is today an overnight accommodation use. The proposal is to raze most of the existing units, retaining only four units in the existing buildng facing S. Gulfview. The proposal includes 27 attached dwelling units. Dwelling units are not equal to overnight accommodation units /rooms. Revise response. 9/29/05 - WW General Applicability criteria #4 response: There are presently 42 overnight accommodation rooms /units. Unclear as to statement that "the number of units is being reduced by 10..." as this is not the case. Revise. 23 . 11/30/05 - WW Revise response to correct directions for projects listed (most are wrong directions). This proposed building fronts on Bayway Blvd. where attached buildings to the east of this project are two- or three -story over ground -level parking, with front setbacks to buildings ranging from five feet to 30 feet. The project at 706 Bayway Blvd was 87.25 feet to the roof deck, but where the stairs /elevator portion of the building was at a front setback of 16 feet, but the bulk of the building was approved at a front setback of 33 feet. With this project, the entire building is proposed at a front setback of 10 feet. Need to provide greater justification as to how the requested flexibility is consistent with the community character of the surrounding area. 9/29/05 - WW Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria #8 response: Provide specific information justifying HOW "flexibility in regard to required setbacks, height and off - street parking are justified by the benefits to community character and the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole." Besides setbacks, address height and parking. Development Review Agenda - Thursday, December 8, 2005 - Page 43 24 . 11/30/05 - WW Need to be more specific as to what portion of the parking lot easement is proposed to be terminated. No 8.5 "x11" sketch was attached to the response letter dated 10/4/05. The "cross parking easement" document (signed August 25, 2000) submitted is not a complete document (not all pages submitted) nor is it recorded. Submit a copy of the complete, recorded document. 9/28/05 - WW It is unclear whether the aplicant will be attempting to terminate the entire parking easement or only a portion. Staff will not support a termination of the entire parking easement (see comment under 7/8/05 below). 9/2/05 - WW The comment below is still applicable. 7/8/05 - WW Note: Description of Request narrative indicates that the parking easement on this property on the north side is being terminated by this owner. There may be a Zoning Code issue with such termination, as this parking may be required parking for the adjoining businesses. Provide documentation that such parking is not required parking for these adjacent businesses. If it produces a reduction to required parking, a request (with all supporting applications, plans, etc.) for such must be filed to run concurrently with this request. Staff may not support any reduction of required parking for such businesses. 25 . Sheet C2.1 indicates areas around the existing to remain overnight accommodation building to be removed for landscaping (as indicated on Sheet L1.1). However, there are parking spaces to the west adjacent to S. Gulfview for the overnight accommodation use that do not make these two spaces readily accessible. Additionally, there is no access to parking at the new building that is supposedly for the overnight accommodation use. Need to revise Sheets C2.1, C3.1 C4.1 and L1.1 to show necessary access to parking areas for the overnight accommodation use. 26. Since the existing pool and spa are being demolished, unclear where the pool equipment is to be located. Show /revise. 27. Revise all appropriate sheets to indicate existing /proposed sidewalk access to the existing to be retained overnight accommodation use building (front, east and rear elevations show doors). 28. Revise the title on Sheet A -02 for the existing to be retained overnight accommodation use building for the "front" elevation to "right" elevation (east side of building). 29. There are two concrete areas on the north and south sides of an a/c pad on the east side of the existing to be retained overnight accommodation use building. Unclear why these two concrete areas are being retained. Advise or revise all appropriate sheets. 30. The survey indicates a 10 -foot setback line along Bayway Blvd, Parkway Drive and S. Gulfview Blvd (per PB 38 Pgs 38 -39). This dashed line is carried onto Sheet C3.1 where dimensions from the property lines to the building or other structures have been indicated. Unclear in the northeast corner of the property (at intersection of Bayway Blvd and Parkway Drive) that the building has been dimensioned at a 10 -foot setback from Bayway Blvd, yet the dashed line goes through the column ( ?). Something is wrong - which is correct? Unclear why the proposed building is designed on an angle (10 -foot setback in the northeast corner to 13 -foot setback in the northwest corner). Architectual plans on Sheet A -01.1 indicates a 10 -foot setback to all columns along Bayway Blvd. 31 . Sheet A -01.1 - Unclear as to need for "storage" room in the northwest corner of the building and whom this "storage" is to be used for. There is no sidewalk access provided to this room. Unclear why access cannot be located internally. North elevation on Sheet A -2.1 indicates double doors /windows to the east of the access door, but the floor plan doesn't indicate such doors /windows. Advise /revise. 32. Based on the floor plans on Sheets A -01.1, A -01.2 and A -01.3 and the north and west elevations, it is assumed that there is no roof over the ramp on the west side of the building and that the two -story area for this ramp is only a vertical facade. Advise. Also, revise Sheet A -01.3 to indicate the upper facade walls for the ramp area on the west side of the building. 33 . Sheet C1.1 - Revise the acreage number in the proposed lot area (not 10.92 acres, but 1.092 acres). 34. Building elevation for the existing to remain overnight accommodation use (Sheet A -02) - Provide a dimension line with the height of the building from BFE to the roof deck. Also dimension the height of the parapet from roof deck. 35 . Window and door locations are not coordinated between the floor plans and the building elevations. Coordinate /revise. Development Review Agenda - Thursday, December 8, 2005 - Page 44 Notes: 36 . Sheet C3.1 - Providet a dimension for the front setback to the existing pavement from Bayway Blvd in the northwest corner of the property. 37. Unclear as to the request. In the "Description of Request" narrative (second sentence) "office" is mentioned as part of the mixed use proposal. However, in the response to Planning comment #23 in the 10/4/05 letter it is noted that the office is a "management office." Much like one of Planning's other comments, unclear as to the purpose of this "office" space shown on the plans. If it rentable nonresidential space, has it been calculated as part of the 3,350 square feet of nonresidential space or what? 38 . Revise the "Description of Request" narrative for height and setbacks to the present proposal (see above "Request" for Staffs interpretation of the proposal). 39. Sheet C3.1 - Provide the setback dimensions for the following: a) Side (south) setback from the proposed lot line to the proposed pavement (north of existing adjacent retail building); b) Side (south) setback from the proposed lot line (corner of the existing adjacent retail building) to the corner of the proposed building; c) Side (west) setback to the patio deck (west of existing to remain overnight accommodation use building). 40. Civil and architectual plans - Revise the space indicated as "shop" to "retail" on the ground floor. 41. Provide a color rendering of the existing to remain (but renovated) overnight accommodation use building (at least the front elevation). 42. Indicate on the building elevations (both buildings) the proposed color scheme for the entire building (indicate the proposed color names). Provide the proposed colors of the awnings indicated on the north side of the proposed mixed use building and on the east and west sides of the overnight accommodation use building. Other: No Comments Development Review Agenda - Thursday, December 8, 2005 - Page 45 0 ajild Community Response Team Planning Dept. Cases — DRC Case No.% L0, (9707 Meeting Date: /Z "$� ©� Location: 6 -2 9 51 z u -0. ,)2--durrent Use: h�7`9 C n41 P#r-?L11q�zv e. Active Code Enforcement Case (no)�es Address number . e (no) (vacant land) `,a- Landscaping yes (no Overgrown (yes) no) Debris (yes) � no Inoperative vehicle(s ye (no) ,,zr,'Building(s) (good) air (poor) (vacant land) a,a' Fencing on (good) (dilapidated) (broken and /or missing pieces) ,a- Paint (good) & (poor) (garish) .,v,K Grass Parking (yes) o) ,er Residential Parking Violations (yes) 'no) la-' Signage (none) (o (not ok) (billboard) Parking (n /a) (striped) (handicapped) (needs repaving) p- Dumpste (enclos) (not enclosed) _j2-- Outdoor storage (yes) . no Comments /Status Report (attach any pertinent docu ts): Date: 1 - 29 -01; — Reviewed by: S%�� Telephone: �a a Revised 0 02 -04 -03 0 ,#rT CITY OF CLEARWATER *� . ,il PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVE. CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 PHONE (727) 562 -4567 FAX (727) 562 -4576 CASE SUMMARY PNU2005 -03100 678 S GULFVIEW BLVD CLEARWATER BEACH RESORT ABV's - boat, limo, been there for months PEOPLE Role: Owner /Property CONDITIONS SKTEL INC. 678 S GULFVIEW BLVD CLEARWATER, FL 33767 PHONE: No Phone FAX: No Fax 3- 1503.B.1. Not Met "PUBLIC NUISANCE CONDITION"* a condition or use that exists on this property causes a substantial diminution of value of property in the vicinity of this condition or use and is considered a public nuisance. 3- 1503.6.6. Not Met " *INOPERATIVE VEHICLE"* The outdoor storage of all or part of any dismantled, partially dismantled, inoperative or discarded vehicle, machinery, appliance, farm equipment, aircraft, construction equipment, boat, personal watercraft, trailer, truck, motorcycle, bicycle, or scrap metal, on any public or private property within the city limits. ACTIVITIES Date 1 Date 2 Date 3 Complaint Received 11/7/2005 Done Disp By SDB Inspection 11/7/2005 11/9/200511/9/2005 FAIL SDB photos; ABV boat, trailer and van that aren't under carport. Several other ABV's but all under carports so no violation, just look terrible to all passersby. Inspection 11/9/2005 12/2/2005 Research Records 11/18/2005 Had to change owners name in permit plan; came up incorrectly. Courtesy Letter 11/18/200512/2/2005 DONE SDB DONE SDB r: \Forms \lnfoSum mary.rpt �- CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING +hI UIW _�''0�._ 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVE. CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 PHONE (727) 562 -4567 FAX (727) 562 -4576 CASE SUMMARY CDC2005 -01801 678 S GULFVIEW BLVD CLEARWATER BEACH RESORT Missing fascia on all buildings PEOPLE Role: Owner /Property SKTEL INC. PHONE: No Phone 678 S GULFVIEW BLVD FAX: No Fax CLEARWATER, FL 33767 CONDITIONS 3- 1502.B. Not Met "EXTERIOR SURFACES" - All building walls shall be maintained in a secure and attractive manner. Exterior surfaces shall be free of mildew; rust; loose material including peeling paint; and patching, painting or resurfacing shall be accomplished to match the existing or adjacent surfaces as to material, color, bond and joining. All exterior surfaces other than decay- resistant wood and other weather durable finishes, shall be protected from the elements by paint or other protective covering applied and maintained in accord with manufacturer's specifications and otherwise treated in a consistent manner. Done ACTIVITIES Date 1 Date 2 Date 3 Disp By Inspection 7/18/2005 11/9/2005 11/9/2005 photos missing fascia, open holes on every bldg. Complaint Received Inspection 11/9/2005 12/27/2005 7/18/2005 Research Records 11/18/2005 Had to correct owners name; came up wring in property appraiser. Courtesy Letter 11/18/200512/27 /2005 FAIL SDB SDB DONE SDB DONE SDB rAForms \InfoSummary,.rpt Wells, Wayne From: Kambourolias, Sam Sent: Tuesday, November 29, 2005 1:16 PIVI To: Wells, Wayne Cc: Watkins, Sherry Subject: FLD2005-07071 EL I ®D aerial.doc existing.doc FLD Map request location.doc zone.doc form.doc Sam Kambourolias 9 Oil a rw=� 0) M 2 8 �fl N 9D 3 ltl-� • Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Wednesday, November 23, 2005 2:47 PM To: Kambourolias, Sam Cc: Herman, Jason Subject: Map Request for 678 South Gulfview Boulevard 0 Sam - Attached is a map request for Case FLD2005 -07071 for the property at 678 South Gulfview Boulevard. I will bring over the paperwork. The survey that I will bring over you may keep. Thanks- Wayne I FLD Map request form.doc • • Flexible Development Application - Map Request Planner Name: Wayne Wells Case Number: FLD2005 -07071 Date Requested: November 23, 2005 Date Requested for (date): December 9, 2005 Maps Requested x❑ Location Map x❑ Aerial Map x❑ Zoning Map x❑ Existing Surrounding Uses Map Required Documents to be submitted to Engineering x❑ Legal Description x❑ Survey x❑ Map with Proposed Site Highlighted Map Name Owner: SKTEL, Inc. Case: FLD2005 -07071 Site: 678 South Gulfview Boulevard j Property Size(Acres): 1.09 ! PIN: 17/29/15/51755/000 /0000 Atlas Page: 285A AL, /Ze,o r- a 70-7 678 So Gu4aarw 15Nwas 0 • ♦ 276A 276B ,, CITY OF CLEARWATER rdr AND VICINITY ,o A SAY PINSUAS COUNTY. ITARIDA ` y oe� e -'+0 / j BuyNy>m<[Y c<eswa rACxe T �./ `IZMWATER ! PREPARED By ` PURWC WORKS AD14INISTRATION ENGINEERING 22/02 1 @ t� a e��� 18 ,9 jjj,,, POINT c��� too S Y `_� Ph.: (613)sMfilr 4750, roc (613)526-475 5 0 TOWNHOUSE hllp: / /www.d<arwate a<om /eng6<y/ 1,2 eT�O e V'� 22 80 –s 2S Dimialmer. •`•. °� 1 Y4 6 B e Q 21 7 6 Q F s B� d s/ C� 1 DAD r�I roll1� 6 Public hfmm°Ilm data Is furnlsned by the City of Clearwoler Pudic Works .�� 2 �a 21 F Op E Admhlstralbn /Englncaring, ontl mull De occeple0 bnd used by the recipient with the unde'I. ing that the dal° 3 { j1 @��e a eg�$e9 20 dCA N WNDOe �Oa Ol -9 {w ed �kmem for developing a graphic a Pur/he raelry I S 66 /9 1B b Ns at ' � he 1� Mt city y y of Clearwater PWA/E makes no worroniks, expressed or ImPlled, mncerning the 6 17 16 1j> w k we �y 1 �T k° accuracy. ComPletmess. rNlobllily, m sultablllly of this data for any other Particular use. Eurthnm the City Ciearwo/er 4 2 , of PWA/E assume. no IWblllly wholeoeler associated with the ure g e g 6 ®3 m misuse of u dot.. I 0 10 " CONTINENT yu pa 2 11 10 B y B i This Altos pope Is subject to Periodic changes. TOWERS t wo r �> e n R �8 fm Mfmmallarl Obout Wiest —War, please call PWA/t m dsit our Web site. I CONDO w N J I 'kre 6 -9 to 17 �> e�gol ,B e ` 1Y.`O e �" `•+.i tg� t O J� I % 0 100 200 400 600 V 4q{ SCALE: 1" = 400' I 13, a �Jd ID a LEGEND: I ���y/�(/j O BLOCK NUMBER J g N CO 1234 LOT ADDRESS (n ® I T r ii l L a) , CITY LIMITS LINE I - 17 ::; -:1 SHADED AREA - PROPERTY OUTSIDE CLEARWATER CITY LIMITS A AGREEMENT TO ANNEX ♦ CITY OWNED PROPERTY MDR ZONING DESIGNATION _ Jaa y a ZONE LINE rJ lit Aw � f { P REraNI mb ID eyes 05 /07/57 ;SAND KEY COUNTY PARK �., OS /R t_ r r ' 2� /D, i '- - - -- -- - - - - -- t '1 +» 2Jp REVISED. 03/08/99. ZONING ATLAS ' NW 1/4 OF SE ♦ 294A 29 S 150E 2 8 5 A 0 • • s Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Saturday, October 08, 2005 10:36 AM To: Albee, Rick; Blackburn, Anne; Buysse, Beverly A.; Dougall- Sides, Leslie; Glenn, Tom; Gluski, Roberta; Kader, Art; Kurleman, Scott; Melone, Donald; Morris, William D.; Rice, Scott; Schodtler, John; Strong, Steve; Tefft, Robert; Thompson, Neil; Watkins, Sherry Subject: FLD2005- 07071, 678 South Gulfview Blvd DRC Members - Plans were recently resubmitted for the above referenced project and placed on the file cabinets along with those projects found sufficient at the September 29, 2005, DRC meeting. THIS PROJECT WAS PLACED ON THE FILE CABINETS IN ERROR. This case, as well as FLD2005 -09092 (overnight accommodations), was found INSUFFICIENT to move forward to the CDB. While some of you have been reviewing the revised plans, this case will be scheduled for review by the DRC on December 8, 2005. You may wish to not rush to review these plans at this time. Please note that Case FLD2005 -09092 (overnight accommodations) has been withdrawn from further review. That portion of the property has now been enveloped /combined with the mixed use case (FLD2005- 07071). Wayne 1:00 Om Case Number: FLD2005 -00 -- 678 S GULFVIEW BLVD FI Owner(s): Moorings Town Homes Ii 1r 9100 Bayhill Blvd ��, �� Orlando, Fl 32819 TELEPHONE: No Phone, FAX: No Fax, E -MAIL: No Email Applicant Playa Delsol Resort 678 S. Gulfview Blvd Clearwater, Fl 33767 TELEPHONE: 727 -543 -5599, FAX: 727 -523 -1437, E -MAIL: No Email Representative. Housh Ghovaee 601 Cleveland Street Clearwater, Fl 33755 TELEPHONE: 727 - 443 -2869, FAX: 727 - 446 -8036, E -MAIL: nestech @mindspring.com Location: 0.978 acres located at the southwest corner of the intersection of Bayway Boulevard and Parkway Drive. Atlas Page: 285A Zoning District: T, Tourist Request: Flexible Development approval to permit a mixed use (3,350 square feet of retail and restaurant floor area and 27 attached dwellings) with reductions to the front (east along Bayway Blvd) setback from 15 feet to 10 feet (to building), from 15 feet to xx feet (to existing pavement), from 15 feet to 8.7 feet (to pavement) and from 15 feet to zero feet (to trash staging area), a reduction to the front (east along Parkway Drive) setback from 15 feet to 10 feet, reductions to the side (west) setback from 10 feet to xx feet (to building, from 10 feet to zero feet (to pool deck), from 10 feet to xx feet (to pavement) and from 10 feet to zero feet (to existing sidewalk), a reduction to the side (south) setback from 10 feet to zero feet (to pool deck), reductions to the side (north) setback from 10 feet to zero feet (to existing pavement), from 10 feet to xx feet (to pavement) and from 10 feet to zero feet (to pool deck), an increase to building height from 35 feet to 100 feet (to roof deck) with an additional xx feet for perimeter parapets (from roof deck), a reduction to required parking for the proposed restaurant from 15 spaces seven spaces per 1,000 square feet, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2- 803.C. Proposed Use: Mixed use Development Review Agenda - Thursday, September 29, 2005 - Page 28 Neighborhood Clearwater4'h Association • Association(s): Clearwater, 1 33767 100 Devon Dr TELEPHONE: 443 -2168, FAX: No Fax, E -MAIL: papamurphy @aol.com Neighborhood Clearwater Neighborhoods Coalition Association(s): Clearwater, Fl 33761 2544 Frisco Drive TELEPHONE: 727 - 725 -3345, FAX: No Fax, E -MAIL: Djw @gte.net Neighborhood Clearwater Point I Beach House 16 Association(s): Clearwater, Fl 33767 845 Bayway Blvd TELEPHONE: 535 -2424, FAX: No Fax, E -MAIL: No Email Neighborhood Clearwater Point 3 Marina House 17 Association(s): Clearwater, Fl 33767 868 Bayway Blvd #212 TELEPHONE: No Phone, FAX: No Fax, E -MAIL; No Email Neighborhood Clearwater Point 4 Island House I Association(s): Clearwater, Fl 33767 895 S Gulfview Blvd TELEPHONE: 530 -4517, FAX: No Fax, E -MAIL: No Email Neighborhood Clearwater Point 5 Admiral House 19 Association(s): Clearwater, Fl 33767 825 S Gulfview Blvd #104 TELEPHONE: 447 -0290, FAX: No Fax, E -MAIL: No Email Neighborhood Clearwater Point 7 Inc, Yacht House Association(s): Clearwater, F133767 851 Bayway Blvd TELEPHONE: 727 - 441 -8212, FAX: No Fax, E -MAIL: cpoint7 @knology.net Neighborhood Clearwater Point 8 Shipmaster, Sail Association(s): Clearwater, F1 33767 800 S Gulfview Blvd TELEPHONE: 727 - 442 -0664, FAX: No Fax, E -MAIL: clwpt8 @tampabay.rr.com Presenter: Wayne Wells, Planner III yy Attendees Included: City Staff: Wayne Wells, Neil Thompson, Scott Rice, Lenny Rickart, JZ*",- Q��QT�, 3��1 Applicant/Rep: Doreen Williams, Renee Ruggiero, C- v"rvtiJ1Ql The DRC reviewed this application with the following comments: General Engineering: Development Review Agenda - Thursday, September 29, 2005 - Page 29 1. Fire Departm nnection (F.D.C.) shall be installed at least t from the face of the building. 2. F.D.C. shall be located no more that 40 feet from a fire hydrant. 3. Proposed property line will separate 678 S. Gulfview Blvd. from site and leave no frontage on S. Gulfview Blvd. A correct address for the proposed building will be provided by the Engineering Department. Contact Steve Doherty (727) 562 -4773 for address assignment. 4. All unused drive aprons and/or parking surfaces are to be removed in its entirety, by the contractor, at the applicant's expense. The right -of- way(s) are to be restored with new sidewalk and sod as required. 5. Directional arrows on pavement at the east end of the building and within the I st floor of the garage are reversed. 6. Show private sanitary sewer main that exists on_ the proposed site. What does the main service and will it be maintained? 7. There is an existing stormwater system that runs through the site. What is the drainage area to the existing system? All of the above to be addressed prior to CDB. The following to be addressed prior to building permit: 1. All fire hydrant assemblies installed greater than 10 ft. from a water main shall be constructed with ductile iron pipe and shall have a gate valve at the tee on the branch line, and at the fire hydrant assembly (F.H.A.). 2. Any new concrete driveway apron(s) constructed within the right -of -way shall be a minimum 6" thick fibrous concrete, and a minimum 3000 psi with 6" x 6" / 10 x 10 w.w.m. 3. Sidewalks and sidewalk ramps adjacent to or a part of the project shall be designed and constructed consistent with City of Clearwater Contract Specifications and Standards Index #109, including the A.D.A. (Truncated domes per D.O.T. Index #304.) 4. A separate right -of -way permit will be required for all work within the right -of -way of any of the adjacent street(s) that are assigned to the city. See Don Melone (727) 562 -4798 in Room #220 at the MSB (Municipal Services Building). General Note: DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review, additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. Environmental: I , Prior to CDB: 1. Underground Vaults are not allowed as water quality facilities and are permittable only if specifically approved by the City Engineer. Provide justification for an underground vault. 2. In the event that an underground vault is approved, an oil and grease separator or comparable treatment system to capture automobile pollutants will be required. 3. Details and a cross - section of the vault must be submitted. Prior to Building Permit: 4. A vault maintenance schedule must be submitted to include an event following construction and at least on an annual basis thereafter. Fire: 1 . Fire pump and Generator must be installed above BFE. Acknowledge PRIOR TO CDB 2 . This building is determined to meet the criteria of a High Rise Building as defined by the Florida Fire Prevention Code, 2004 Edition, therefore the requirements of a High Rise structure must be met. These requirements include, but are not limited to Fire Code items such as: Fire Pump and generator if pump is electric, sprinkler system throughout with control valve and water flow device on each floor, Class I Standpipe System, Fire Alarm using voice /alarm communication, Central Fire Control Station, firefighter phone system, Emergency lighting, and Standby Power as per NFPA 70, Pressurized Stairwells, Stairwell marking and Elevator Lobbies. Please acknowledge PRIOR TO CDB. 3 . Provide and show on the plan mini um 30' turning radius for emergency vehicle ingress and egress at West Entry off of Bay,,, PRIOR TO CDB. 4 The Retention Vault SHALL be built to withstand 80,000 lb. Load of Fire Apparatus. Acknowledge PRIOR TO CDB. Harbor Master: 1 . No issues. Legal: 1 . No issues. Development Review Agenda - Thursday, September 29, 2005 - Page 30 Land Resources: • 1 . Show ALL trees with their canopies on ALL civil and landscape plans prior to CDB. 2 . Show trees # 1,2,6,7 and 8 to be preserved. Relocate ALL utilities from under their canopies prior to CDB. 3 . Show the oak trees east of the proposed parking lot to be preserved prior to CDB. 4 . Provide a Tree Preservation Plan prepared by a certified arborist, consulting arborist, landscape architect or other specialist in the field of arboriculture. This plan must show how the proposed building, parking, stormwater and utilities impact the critical root zones (drip lines) of trees to be preserved and how you propose to address these impacts ie; crown elevating, building lintels, root pruning and/or root aeration systems. Other data required on this plan must show the trees canopy line, actual tree barricade limits (2/3 of the drip line and/or in the root prune lines if required), and the tree barricade detail. And any other pertinent information the arborist feels relates to tree preservation. Provide prior to building permit. Landscaping: 1 . Show on Sheets C2.1, C3.1 and L1.1 all edges of pavement for open parking areas, including the existing parking area on the west side, being curbed. Provide wheel stops for the four parking spaces in the southwest side. 2 . Ensure that the number of trees for the foundation landscape area are being met per Section 3- 1202.E.2 (at least two accent trees (or palm equivalents) or three palms for every 40 linear feet of building facade). 3 . Sheet L1.1 - Revise Landscaping Note #8, as required trees must be a minimum of 10 -foot tall and 2.5 -inch caliper at time of planting. 4. Show on the civil and landscape plans all existing trees, with an indication as to whether they are being retained/preserved or being removed. 5 . Per Section 3- 1202.B.1, palms can be used to satisfy 75% of tree requirements on the Beach. Staggered clusters of 3 palm trees = 1 shade tree, except for specimen palm trees such as: phoenix canariensis (canary island date palm), phoenix dactylifera (edible date palm) and . phoenix reclinata (senegal date palm), which count as shade trees'on a 1:,1 ratio. Revise Sheet L1.1. 6 . Sheet Ll.l - Revise the quantities in the Landscape Table. I find 88 XA, 113 IH, 86 SB (correct), 151 VA, 87 PD, 20 SP (correct), 12 WR and zero PT. There are also four TB indicated on the landscape plan not indicated in the Table. Revise. Parks and Recreation: 1 . Open space /recreation impact fees are due prior to issuance of building permits or final plat (if applicable) whichever occurs first. These fees could be substantial and it is recommended that you contact Art Kader at 727 -562 -4824 to calculate the assessment. Stormwater: 1 Prior to CDB the consulting engineer is to modify the proposed plan to show where the stormwater vault discharges into the City of Clearwater storm system. Prior to issuance of a building permit the applicant is to provide a copy of the approved SWFWMD permit for the proposed project. Solid Waste: 1 . Trash room not large enough to hold residental 35 units plus commercial trash (seems like a long haul to staging area) Show where recycling carts will be placed for resident use. Traffic Engineering: Development Review Agenda - Thursday, September 29, 2005 - Page 31 1 Re- locate hand* pace adjacent to trash room on 2nd floor to oor close to an accessible entrance or near elevator per Florida Building Code Section 11.4.6. 2. Handicap parking spaces must meet the minimum vertical clear height of 8 feet 2 inches (8' 2 ") including entrance, route, parking space and exit per Florida Building Code. 3. Parking garage must meet a minimum vertical clear height of 7 feet (7') for parking spaces other than handicap parking per Florida Building Code. 4. Objects inside sight distance triangles must not exceed the City's vertical height limitations. (City's Community Development Code, Section 3 -904) 5. The two driveways along N. BayWay Blvd. do not meet the City's 125' minimum driveway separation for access management. 6. Demonstrate how a parked motorist can exit out of the parallel parking space(s). 7. Dimension parking spaces and drive aisles on architectural plans. All of the above to be addressed prior to CDB. Planning: General note: Comply with the current Transportation Impact Fee Ordinance and fee schedule. Development Review Agenda - Thursday, September 29, 2005 - Page 32 1 . 9/28/05 - WW 0 Is It is unclear whether the aplicant will be attempting to terminate the entire parking easement or only a portion. Staff will not support a termination of entire parking easement (see comment under 7/8/05 below). 9/2/05 - WW The comment below is still applicable. 7/8/05 - WW Note: Description of Request narrative indicates that the parking easement on this property on the north side is being terminated by this owner. There may be a Zoning Code issue with such termination, as this parking may be required parking for the adjoining businesses. Provide documentation that such parking is not required parking for these adjacent businesses. If it produces a reduction to required parking, a request (with all supporting applications, plans, etc.) for such must be filed to run concurrently with this request. Staff may not support any reduction of required parking for such businesses., 2 . 9/28/05 & 9/2/05 - WW The building appears to be lined up with the property line along Parkway Drive at a 10 -foot setback, however, it appears that the building is not parallel with the property line along Bayway Blvd. but rather at a slight angle. A dimension of 12.8 feet is provided to a column closer to the ramp but the same 12.8 -foot dimension is also provided to the face of the building at the southeast corner, yet the colum does not meet a 10 feet setback from Bayway Blvd. at this southeast corner. An 11.6 -foot dimension has been provided on the south side, but to the existing property line (not the proposed property line, although both should be provided). Need to provide the dimension from the new corner of the proposed lot line (corner of the retail building) to the proposed Playa building (side setback). 7/8/05 - WW Provide on Sheet C2.1 dimensions to all structures, including the columns on the east adjacent to Parkway Drive, the columns adjacent to Bayway Blvd, the columns close to the pool, the pool deck, the existing Building A, pavement/pavers /deck/other structures around Building A, the trash staging area from the front property line, the existing pavement from the front property line in the northeast corner 3 . 9/28/05 & 9/2/05 - WW Civil and architectural plans still differ on the address. If this is to be a separate parcel for Playa, a new address will need to be assigned. 7/9/05 - WW Revise address of project in title block on civil and architectural plans from 678 N. Bayway Blvd. to 678 S. Gulfview Blvd. 4 . 9/28/05 - WW Placed on Sheet C 1.1 for FLD2005- 09092. Move to this set of plans. 9/2/05 & 7/9/05 - WW Provide on Sheet C 1.1 a table PER FLOOR of the square footage of nonresidential floor area, number of parking spaces, number of dwellings and number of overnight accommodation units, including the totals of all. 5 . 9/28/05 & 9/2/05 - WW Provide on Sheets C2.1 and L1.1 the sight visibility triangles adjacent to the driveway (off -site) at the northWEST (my mistake) corner of the property on Bayway Blvd. 7/9/05 - WW Provide on Sheets C2.1 and Ll. I the sight visibility triangles at the intersection of Bayway Blvd and Parkway Drive and adjacent to the driveway (off -site) at the northeast corner of the property on Bayway Blvd. 6 . 9/28/05 & 9/2/05 & 7/9/05 - WW Show /indicate the location of all outdoor lighting fixtures. 7. 9/28/05 & 9/2/05 & 7/9/05 - WW Indicate on the building elevations the height of the building from BFE to the highest roof deck (not ceiling), as well as the height of the parapet from the roof deck of the highest roof deck. Ensure these heights are indicated in the site data table on Sheet C1.1. 8 . 9/28/05 & 9/2/05 & 7/9/05 - WW Provide the proposed gross floor area and FAR in the site data table on Sheet C1.1 FOR ONLY THE RETAIL AND RESTAURANT FLOOR AREA (emphasis added this time). Development Review Agenda - Thursday, September 29, 2005 - Page 33 9 . 9/28/05 & 9/2/0/9/05 - WW • Show at least in concept all proposed freestanding and attached signs; showing on Sheets C2.1, C3.1 and L1.1 the location and setback from property lines of proposed freestanding signage and on the building elevations the location of proposed attached signage. Details may come later through the building permit review process or through the submission of a Comprehensive Sign Program application. Also address existing signage, which will be required to be brought into conformance with Code requirements (provide at least photographs of existing signage). 10. 9/28/05 & 9/2/05,- WW Depict by shading or crosshatching all required parking lot interior landscaped areas and include the square footages of all areas being counted toward the interior landscaping. 11 . Indicate on the building elevations that the outdoor mechanical units are proposed on the roof. Indicate screening materials. 12 . Staff indicated on 7/8/05 that Staff will not support this request unless there are improvements to the site around the overnight accommodation building (Building A). This is still Staffs position, as reflected in the review comments for FLD2005- 09092. 13 . Provide a legal description for the subject area. 14. Sheet C1.1 - Revise the Site data table under "density" to remove the asterik. Also remove from the bottom of the table the asterik which indicates "27 attached dwellings + 4 TDRs = 31 units ". 15 . Sheet C 1.1 - Parking calculations at the bottom of the Site Data table for residential equates to 31 dwellings. Only 27 units are proposed. Revise. 16. Parking for the restaurant is required at *15 spaces per 1,000 square feet. For a 2,500 square -foot restaurant, 38 parking spaces are required. The proposal indicates that only 18 spaces, or seven spaces per 1,000 square feet, are being provided. No parking demand study has been submitted justifying the proposed reduction to required parking for the restaurant/site. Based on the proposed uses, and since two parking spaces are assigned to the Clearwater Beach Resort proposal (FLD2005- 09092), 86 spaces are required to be provided (five for retail; 38 for restaurant; 41 for residential; two for overnight accommodation). Only 77 spaces are provided. Revise the proposal and/or submit a parking demand study for any reduction. Prior to the submittal of the study, the methodology of such study shall be approved by the Community Development Coordinator and shall be in accordance with accepted traffic engineering principles. The findings of the study will be used in determining whether or not deviations to the parking standards are approved. 17 . Sheet C1.1 - Fix the "Project Site" depiction on the map and aerial to coincide with property lines. Note: Aerial is too dark. 18 . Sheet C1.1 - Revise the Site Data table for "Building Height" to that actually proposed. Include the height of the parapet, if greater than 30- inches. 19 . Sheet C1.1 - Remove from the Site Data table under "Density" the "4 overnight accommodations (to remain)" since these four rooms /units are under Case No. FLD2005- 09092. 20. The sidewalks to the retail area, the lobby and the restaurant on Bayway Blvd. and to the restaurant on Parkway Drive are excessively wide. Those sidewalks on Bayway Blvd. are the same width as the driveways for vehicles, whereas sidewalks are for people. Reduce in width and location in relation to doors. 21 . The four 90- degree parking spaces south of the retention vault encroach onto the required sidewalk at the rear of the adjacent retail building and the drive aisle between the spaces at 32 feet is excessive. Revise to eliminate the encroachment and reduce the drive aisle width. 22 . The site design indicates three proposed parking spaces tucked under the ramp up to the second floor parking level. Provide details as to vertical clearance for these vehicles through cross - sections and also show on the west side elevation, which does not acknowledge these parking spaces tucked under the ramp. 23 . Site and building plans indicate an "office" next to the "shop" with a "storage" area to the rear of the "shop." Unclear what this "office" is for, since it doesn't have any clear access to it. If for the condos, still unclear why such is necessary, since there is a "clubhouse" on the ground level and a "gameroom" and "fitness center" on the second floor. Advise /revise. 24. Since this site is within an AE flood zone, uses on the ground floor must be floodproofed. Advise how this will be accomplished from an architectural standpoint and whether some of the spaces indicated are allowable below BFE (equipment, tele /data, storage, clubhouse, etc.). Development Review Agenda - Thursday, September 29, 2005 - Page 34 S£ 02?ud - SOOZ `6Z .zaquzajdoS `Xppsmgj - 19pu92?d matna2i juau.tdolanaQ „ azp.i„ of ,@sve.i,, joauoo of jsanboZj jo uoudt.tosaQ aqi jo p autl astnaZl 6£ •(I•TD laagS uo alqui plpQ ajiS oqj uo umogs sr) •Iaoj a.ipnbs SI9`Zb of looiud oqj jo oSplooj a.tunbs oqj loauoo of uoilBogddu agl3o l 3272(1 astna'd g£ •osina21 -Itpja.i/aogjo;ou `poj asunbs OS£`£3o juu.inpisa.i pup liploi io3 sum asn paxtui oqj jq�3nogj I - „asn posodoid,, zqj uotlpoilddp aqj jo l a�3pd astna- L£ •astna21 'ull oq pinogs p 9I }tufl pup `72 1Z oq pinogs uSi ;tuff `OZ oq pinorls bi Itun `61 aq pinogs £I ;curl `joonoout air a�?pd agl3o uzouoq all ju szagwnu ;tun - .ioot3 qj9 - 9•I0-V loogS 9£ `u1721201d UOTS antsuogoiduioD p q$norgl q�3tq Iaa3 xis ;u panoiddp ssalun `jaoj .ino3 oq Ilpgs jg2ioq uznuzixuw oq L -2utpltnq oqj jo .ioloo pup slptiaiput .ioi_ialxo oqj goluui of pou2?isop oq pup u�3ts albs- juauinuout p oq u$ts 2utpumsooij a.inoig Cup jpgj :lpnoiddpjo uoilipuoo 1ptluoiod S£ °sltuuod Cup 3o aoupnssi oqj of ioiid Iauz oq s}uauu.imba.i luomindaQ oitd IIp Iuq.I. :lpnoiddp jo uoilipuoo lupuaiod b£ situuod /Cup jo aoupnssi oqj of iotid ptud oq saa3 uotiva.toox pup q_lyd iip wqZ :Ipno.tddu jo uopipuoo lutlua10d ££ ` mednooO jo o1rogt1_iao jsig oqj jo aoupnssi aqj of ioiid popioboi aq jpld iuniutuiopuoo u 172gl :Ipno .iddu jo uotitpuoo 1ppuajod Z£ `atom Jo Juauzaouatuuioo aqI of .loud luouziiudaQ �3uuaotn2ug s,Xi1O oqj pup ioout2uo s jupoilddu oqj Xq panoiddu oq of sltnpuoo jo .iogwnu pup ozis u011pool Iopxo ag1 gjim `( ola `algpo `ouogd `otuoala) sioptnoid Xititln paloogv lip gitm slmpuoo jo joquinu pup ozis aqj oluuipj000 IIpgs antjujuaso.idoi s,jupoilddu oqI, -XoupdnooO3o alpoUpioD u jo aoupnssi oq; of .toted s@2muoij iowis salts a.itluo oqj Ouolp pollu;sui oq llpgs Cum jo -jg2p OutUngp oq; tuji satjtlt }n 2utlsixo jo 2uipuno.i2jopun o-imn3 oqj io3 slinpuoo •puno.i2:[apun poopld oq (Ouiplinq pasodoid oql of Xpm 3o -jq2?u aqj cuoij) sagipin posodoid IIp juq I, :Iuno.iddu 3o uotjtpuoo lutluoiod 1£ `'XouudnooO3o o4rogta133 Isig oql jo aoupnssi oqj of ioiid 1ptogjO Otupitng oqj of pai;tuzgns aq IIpgs `suuo3 a)ItI io suopotusat poop `sluautnoop s iaumootuoq `sluouinoop uintutuzopuoo ui patpogtuo `asn jo uopotzlsa.i stg1 jo aouaptna `Ipno.tddp sigj 01 uotstna21.zoutW p sp J3u3S Xq panoiddu pup posodoid aq sjiun oSuiols gons pinogS •sautlaptnS pup soltu (Vwg3) uoijp.ustutuzpy juauia2pupw ioua�3.iauig Ip.iapa3 llp gjtm aoupgdtuoo ui ` Cluo aft,.iojs to3 pasn aq ioog punoi2i oqj uo sjtun o2eiols oinjtg Cup IpLI.L :Ipnozddu 3o uoi;tpuoo Ipt111010d 0£ `.sltuitad /Cup jo aoupnssi ag; o; iotzd sp.iooa.t otlgnd aql ui paplooaj oq olli 30 xjtufl e ipgs :Ipno.iddu jo uoilipuoo 1equaiod 6Z `.gQO oqj `Xq pogtpoui sp io `o; pa14 u qns suotIpnala Iunldoouoo oq; gltm lualsisuoo oq 2tuppnq oqI jo ioloo puu u2isop 1pug oqI jpgj :lpnoiddp jo uoilipuoo Iptlualod 8Z •slaa.us io sxlpmopts otlgnd oqj 2?utztlt ;n jnogjtm `pa.tu 2ut2iuls gspz; aqj of uioo.i gspu aq} Luoij 132 Iltm siolsdtunp aqj moq of sp uoiIpuuoJui apinoid `spazp Oupi nd $utPltnq- .iapun ow oqj iutjuzudos 2uipltnq posodoid oqj gjtM -alts agl3o uotpod tualsom oqj uo posodo.id si pon, 2uifpjs gsp_it oqi PUB 2utplmq aqj jo uoillod ivajs>?o aqj uo pal coo I si ioog punoz� oqj uo uiooi gsuu posodo-id aqj LZ �soouds �3uTNipd osagl i.uo.i3 shun .ttagl ss000u sisonO uot;ppouiui000u jq�tutano oq; iltm moq `joaztoo si anoqu oqj 3t `osld •xPlulo •alts stg; jo .iau.too Isam41.iou aqj ut paipool aq of azu `(Z6060-SOOZ(1'id) asn uoqupouiui000u lgSttuano all icj Sut�apd pa.itnba.i aiu gotgm `saopds oml asaqL •loofoid asn paxtui stgl JOJ Xpmantzp u.zagl.iou pasodozd oql uio.g poss000u oq of poluauooi oq Iltm pup panouiQJ oq of oiu suaoifIuM of juaopfpp alstp ant.zp aql uzozJ passaoM a.re 1pgl saopds Ouixtpd �utlsixo oql jo oral `Iusodoid sigl jo aiud sr `lpgl Suipuplsiopun Cue s aI 9Z -posodo.id si jugm sloaga.i otpi oorjins snotniaduit oql oinsug -(glnos pup Isom `lspa) Nopglas apts loo3-0 I p loom of pounboi aq pinom xoap lood pup lood oimn3 Cup `oupuaos sigl iopun •podpospuul rom sigl pup ponouia.i lood 2upstxo oql molts uagl `food mou oql u�tsop of /Cep zagloup 011172/v\ pup ftlstxa aql anoivaz of ausop .ino C si li3I •(s)laap lood 2uipnloui) so.inlotuls of sNopqjas gjtm Sul 1pap oiu om aouis `lusodoid stgl iopun mou gons uSisop of poou `uiagl oopldai pur uds pup lood 21Hlstx3 agl anouzaJ of uotjualut aql st It 3I •Iusodoid sigj icj uuld alts oql uo poluoipui lou si stgl `alts asn paxnu posodoid sigl uo si pazp lood aql oouiS ,-sloglo Xq pallruLiad pup uSisop oq of pds pup lood mou„ p pup panouiat oq of posodoid on uds pup lood 2utlsixa oql �llua.ipddp jugl polpoiput.`(uiuuia.i ol) asn uogppomw000p 11121tzian0 a tipld,alts aill u0 SZ 40 . Potential conditi0approval: That, prior to the issuance of any permits, a Minor Lot Adjustment be approved and recorded in the public records; 41. General Applicability criteria #1 response: Correct the directions of surrounding development. Additionally, most of the townhomes are 31 feet to the midroof.point and the condos at 692 Bayway is 42 feet to the roof deck. Provide more detailed information as to HOW this proposal is "in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties." 42 . General Applicability criteria #4 response: There are presently 42 overnight accommodation rooms /units. Unclear as to statement that "the number of units is being reduced by 10..." as this is not the case. Revise. 43 . General Applicability criteria #5 response: Provide information as to HOW this proposal is "consistent with the comri-iunity character of the immediate vicinity." 44. General Applicability criteria #6 response: Statement is made that "all sight triangles are being met," yet the building encroaches into the sight visibility triangles. Advise /revise. 45 . Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria #1 response: Provide the justification as to HOW this proposal is "otherwise impractical without deviations from the use, intensity and development standards." Be specific. 46. Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria #4 response: Provide speicific information justifying HOW this proposal is "compatible with adjacent land uses." 47 Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria #6 response: This proposal does not include any overnight accommodation use. Revise. 48 . Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria #8 response: Provide specific information justifying HOW "flexibility in regard to required setbacks, height and off - street parking are justified by the benefits to community character and the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole." Besides setbacks, address height and parking. 49 . Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria #9 response: The proposal represents a parking reduction for the restaurant, yet no Parking Demand Study has been submitted justifying the proposed reduction. 50 . Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria #10 response: Based on the mixed use calculation, and by cutting off that portion of the existing site for the overnight accommodation use, the density/intensity for this portion of the site is being maxed out. Revise. Other: No Comments Notes: This application is insufficient for the CDB. Submit revised plans and application package by noon on. 11/2/05 for review by DRC on 12/8/05. Development Review Agenda - Thursday, September 29, 2005 - Page 36 t ` S • • Pro#' 1:00 pm Case Number: FLD2005 -07071 -- 678 S GULFVIEW BLVD Owner(s): Moorings Town Homes Ii • ml 9100 Bayhill Blvd lot Orlando, Fl 32819 TELEPHONE: No Phone, FAX: No Fax, E -MAIL: No Email Applicant Playa Delsol Resort 678 S. Gulfview Blvd two""4144 Clearwater, Fl 33767 TELEPHONE: 727 -543 -5599, FAX: 727 -523 -1437, E -MAIL: No Email Representative: Housh Ghovaee 601 Cleveland Street ' Clearwater, Fl 33755 TELEPHONE: 727 - 443 -2869, FAX: 727 - 446 -8036, E -MAIL: nestech @mindspring.com Location: 0.978 acres located at the southwest corner of the intersection of Bayway Boulevard and Parkway Drive. Atlas Page: 285A Zoning District: T, Tourist Request: Flexible Development approval to permit a mixed use (3,350 square feet of retail and restaurant floor area and 27 attached dwellings) with reductions to the front (east along Bayway Blvd) setback from 15 feet to 10 feet (to building), from 15 feet to xx feet (to existing pavement), from 15 feet to 8.7 feet (to pavement) and from 15 feet to zero feet (to trash staging area), a reduction to the front (east along Parkway Drive) setback from 15 feet to 10 feet, reductions to the side (west) setback from 10 feet to xx feet (to building, from 10 feet to zero feet (to pool deck), from 10 feet to xx feet (to pavement) and from 10 feet to zero feet (to existing sidewalk), a reduction to the side (south) setback from 10 feet to zero feet (to pool deck), reductions to the side (north) setback from 10 feet to zero feet (to existing pavement), from 10 feet to xx feet (to pavement) and from 10 feet to zero feet (to pool deck), an increase to building height from 35 feet to 100 feet (to roof deck) with an additional xx feet for perimeter parapets (from roof deck), a reduction to required parking for the proposed restaurant from 15 spaces seven spaces per 1,000 square feet, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2- 803.C. Proposed Use: Mixed use Development Review Agenda - Thursday, September 29, 2005 - Page 28 Neighborhood Clearwater • Association Association(s): Clearwater, Fl 33767 100 Devon Dr TELEPHONE: 443 -2168, FAX: No Fax, E -MAIL: papamurphy @aol.com Neighborhood Clearwater Neighborhoods Coalition Association(s): Clearwater, Fl 33761 2544 Frisco Drive .TELEPHONE: 727 - 725 -3345, FAX: No Fax, E -MAIL: Djw @gte.net Neighborhood Clearwater Point 1 Beach House 16 Association(s): Clearwater, Fl 33767 845 Bayway Blvd TELEPHONE: 535 -2424, FAX: No Fax, E -MAIL: No Email Neighborhood Clearwater Point 3 Marina House 17 Association(s): Clearwater, Fl 33767 868 Bayway Blvd #212 TELEPHONE: No Phone, FAX: No Fax, E -MAIL: No Email Neighborhood Clearwater Point 4 Island House 1 Association(s): Clearwater, Fl 33767 895 S Gulfview Blvd TELEPHONE: 530 -4517, FAX: No Fax, E -MAIL: No Email Neighborhood Clearwater Point 5 Admiral House 19 Association(s): Clearwater, Fl 33767 825 S Gulfview Blvd #104 TELEPHONE: 447 -0290, FAX: No Fax, E -MAIL: No Email Neighborhood Clearwater Point 7 Inc, Yacht House Association(s): Clearwater, F133767 851 Bayway Blvd TELEPHONE: 727 - 441 -8212, FAX: No Fax, E -MAIL: cpoint7 @knology.net Neighborhood Clearwater Point 8 Shipmaster, Sail Association(s): Clearwater, Fl 33767 800 S Gulfview Blvd TELEPHONE: 727 - 442 -0664, FAX: No Fax, E -MAIL: clwpt8 @tampabay.rr.com Presenter: Wayne Wells, Planner III Attendees Included: City Staff: Wayne Wells, Neil Thompson, Scott Rice, Lenny Rickart, Applicant/Rep: Housh Ghovaee, Doreen Williams, Renee Ruggiero The DRC reviewed this application with the following comments: General Engineering: Development Review Agenda - Thursday, September 29, 2005 - Page 29 1. Fire Department Connection (F.D.C.) shall be installed at least 15�t from the face of the building. 2. F.D.C. shall be located no more that 40 feet from a fire hydrant. 3. Proposed property line will separate 678 S. Gulfview Blvd. from site and leave no frontage on S. Gulfview Blvd. A correct address for the proposed building will be provided by the Engineering Department. Contact Steve Doherty (727) 562 -4773 for address assignment. 4. All unused drive aprons and/or parking surfaces are to be removed in its entirety, by the contractor, at the applicant's expense. The right -of- way(s) are to be restored with new sidewalk and sod as required. 5. Directional arrows on pavement at the east end of the building and within the 1 st floor of the garage are reversed. 6. Show private sanitary sewer main that exists on the proposed site. What does the main service and will it be maintained? 7. There is an existing stormwater system that runs through the site. What is the drainage area to the existing system? All of the above to be addressed prior to CDB. The following to be addressed prior to building permit: 1. All fire hydrant assemblies installed greater than 10 ft. from a water main shall be constructed with ductile iron pipe and shall have a gate valve at the tee on the branch line, and at the fire hydrant assembly (F.H.A.). 2. Any new concrete driveway apron(s) constructed within the right -of -way shall be a minimum 6" thick fibrous concrete, and a minimum 3000 psi with 6" x 6" / 10 x 10 w.w.m. 3. Sidewalks and sidewalk ramps adjacent to or a part of the project shall be designed and constructed consistent with City of Clearwater Contract Specifications and Standards Index #109, including the A.D.A. (Truncated domes per D.O.T. Index #304.) 4. A separate right -of -way permit will be required for all work within the right -of -way of any of the adjacent street(s) that are assigned to the city. See Don Melone (727) 562 -4798 in Room #220 at the MSB (Municipal Services Building). General Note: DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review, additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. Environmental: 1 . Prior to CDB: 1. Underground Vaults are not allowed as water quality facilities and are permittable only if specifically approved by the City Engineer. Provide justification for an underground vault. 2. In the event that an.underground vault is approved,.an oil and grease separator or comparable treatment system to capture automobile pollutants will be required. 3. Details and a cross - section of the vault must be submitted. Prior to Building Permit: 4. A vault maintenance schedule must be submitted to include an event following construction and at least on an annual basis thereafter. Fire: 1 . Fire pump and Generator must be installed above BFE. Acknowledge PRIOR TO CDB 2 . This building is determined to meet the criteria of a High Rise Building as defined by the Florida Fire Prevention Code, 2004 Edition, therefore the requirements of a High Rise structure must be met. These requirements include, but are not limited to Fire Code items such as: Fire Pump and generator if pump is electric, sprinkler system throughout with control valve and water flow device on each floor, Class I Standpipe System, Fire Alarm using voice /alarm communication, Central Fire Control Station, firefighter phone system, Emergency lighting, and Standby Power as per NFPA 70, Pressurized Stairwells, Stairwell marking and Elevator Lobbies. Please acknowledge PRIOR TO CDB. 3 . Provide and show on the plan minimum 30' turning radius for emergency vehicle ingress and egress at West Entry off of Baywood. PRIOR TO CDB. 4. The Retention Vault SHALL be built to withstand 80,000 lb. Load of Fire Apparatus. Acknowledge PRIOR TO CDB. Harbor Master: 1 . No issues. Legal: 1 No issues. Development Review Agenda - Thursday, September 29, 2005 - Page 30 Land Resources: • 0 1 . Show ALL trees with their canopies on ALL civil and landscape plans prior to CDB. 2 . Show trees # 1,2,6,7 and 8 to be preserved. Relocate ALL utilities from under their canopies prior to CDB. 3 . Show the oak trees east of the proposed parking lot to be preserved prior to CDB. 4. Provide a Tree Preservation Plan prepared by a certified arborist, consulting arborist, landscape architect or other specialist in the field of arboriculture. This plan must show how the proposed building, parking, stormwater and utilities impact the critical root zones (drip lines) of trees to be preserved and how you propose to address these impacts ie; crown elevating, building lintels, root pruning and/or root aeration systems. Other data required on this plan must show the trees canopy line, actual tree barricade limits (2/3 of the drip line and/or in the root prune lines if required), and the tree barricade detail. And any other pertinent information the arborist feels relates to tree preservation. Provide prior to building permit. Landscaping: 1 . Show on Sheets C2.1, C3.1 and L1.1 all edges of pavement for open parking areas, including the existing parking area on the west side, being curbed. Provide wheel stops for the four parking spaces in the southwest side. 2 . Ensure that the number of trees for the foundation landscape area are being met per Section 3- 1202.E.2 (at least two accent trees (or palm equivalents) or three palms for every 40 linear feet of building facade). 3 . Sheet L1.1 - Revise Landscaping Note #8, as required trees must be a minimum of 10 -foot tall and 2.5 -inch caliper at time of planting. 4. Show on the civil and landscape plans all existing trees, with an indication as to whether they are being retained/preserved or being removed. 5 . Per Section 3- 1202.B.1, palms can be used to satisfy 75% of tree requirements on the Beach_. Staggered clusters of 3 palm trees = 1 shade tree, except for specimen palm trees such as: phoenix canariensis (canary island date palm), phoenix dactylifera (edible date palm) and phoenix reclinata (senegal date palm), which count as shade trees'on a 1:1 ratio. Revise Sheet L1.1. 6. Sheet L1.1 - Revise the quantities in the Landscape Table. I find 88 XA, 113 IH, 86 SB (correct), 151 VA, 87 PD, 20 SP (correct), 12 WR and zero PT. There are also four TB indicated on the landscape plan not indicated in the Table. Revise. Parks and Recreation: 1 . Open space /recreation impact fees are due prior to issuance of building permits or final plat (if applicable) whichever occurs first. These fees could be substantial and it is recommended that you contact Art Kader at 727 -562 -4824 to calculate the assessment. Stormwater: 1 . Prior to CDB the consulting engineer is to modify the proposed plan to show where the stormwater vault discharges into the City of Clearwater storm system. Prior to issuance of a building permit the applicant is to provide a copy of the approved SWFWMD permit for the proposed project. Solid Waste: 1 . Trash room not large enough to hold residenta135 units plus commercial trash (seems like a long haul to staging area) Show where recycling carts will be placed for resident use. Traffic Engineering: Development Review Agenda - Thursday, September 29, 2005 - Page 31 • 1 . Re- locate handicap space adjacent to trash room on 2nd floor to Ist�ioor close to an accessible Planning: entrance or near elevator per Florida Building Code Section 11.4.6.2. 2. Handicap parking spaces must meet the minimum vertical clear height of 8 feet 2 inches (8' 2 ") including entrance, route, parking space and exit per Florida Building Code. 3. Parking garage must meet a minimum vertical clear height of 7 feet (7') for parking spaces other than handicap parking per Florida Building Code. 4. Objects inside sight distance triangles must not exceed the City's vertical height limitations. (City's Community Development Code, Section 3 -904) 5. The two driveways along N. BayWay Blvd. do not meet the City's 125' minimum driveway separation for access management. 6. Demonstrate how a parked motorist can exit out of the parallel parking space(s). 7. Dimension parking spaces and drive aisles on architectural plans. All of the above to be addressed prior to CDB. General note:'Comply with the current Transportation Impact Fee Ordinance and fee schedule Development Review Agenda - Thursday, September 29, 2005 - Page 32 1 . 9/28/05 - WW 0 It is unclear whether the aplicant will be attempting to terminate the entire parking easement or only a portion. Staff will not support a termination of the entire parking easement (see comment under 7/8/05 below). 9/2/05 - WW The comment below is still applicable. 7/8/05 - WW Note: Description of Request narrative indicates that the parking easement on this property on the north side is being terminated by this owner. There may be a Zoning Code issue with such termination, as this parking may be required parking for the adjoining businesses. Provide documentation that such parking is not required parking for these adjacent businesses. If it produces a reduction to required parking, a request (with all supporting applications, plans, etc.) for such must be filed to run concurrently with this request. Staff may not support any reduction of required parking for such businesses. 2 . 9/28/05 & 9/2/05 - WW The building appears to be lined up with the property line along Parkway Drive at a 10 -foot setback, however, it appears that the building is not parallel with the property line along Bayway Blvd. but rather at a slight angle. A dimension of 12.8 feet is provided to a column closer to the ramp but the same 12.8 -foot dimension is also provided to the face of the building at the southeast corner, yet the colum does not meet a 10 feet setback from Bayway Blvd. at this southeast corner. An 11.6 -foot dimension has been provided on the south side, but to the existing property line (not the proposed property line, although both should be provided). Need to provide the dimension from the new corner of the proposed lot line (corner of the retail building) to the proposed Playa building (side setback). 7/8/05 - WW Provide on Sheet C2.1 dimensions to all structures, including the columns on the east adjacent to Parkway Drive, the columns adjacent to Bayway Blvd, the columns close to the pool, the pool deck, the existing Building A, pavement/pavers /deck/other structures around Building A, the trash staging area from the front property line, the existing pavement from the front property line in the northeast corner 3 . 9/28/05 & 9/2/05 - WW Civil and architectural plans still differ on the address. If this is to be a separate parcel for Playa, a new address will need to be assigned. 7/9/05 - WW Revise address of project in title block on civil and architectural plans from 678 N. Bayway Blvd. to 678 S. Gulfview Blvd. 4. 9/28/05 - WW Placed on Sheet C1.1 for FLD2005- 09092. Move to this set of plans. 9/2/05 & 7/9/05 - WW Provide on Sheet C 1.1 a table PER FLOOR of the square footage of nonresidential floor area, number of parking spaces, number of dwellings and number of overnight accommodation units, including the totals of all. 5 . 9/28/05 & 9/2/05 - WW Provide on Sheets C2.1 and L1.1 the sight visibility triangles adjacent to the driveway (off -site) at the northWEST (my mistake) corner of the property on Bayway Blvd. 7/9/05 - WW Provide on Sheets C2.1 and L1.1 the sight visibility triangles at the intersection of Bayway Blvd and Parkway Drive and adjacent to the driveway (off -site) at the northeast corner of the property on Bayway Blvd. 6. 9/28/05 & 9/2/05 & 7/9/05 - WW Show /indicate the location of all outdoor lighting fixtures. 7 . 9/28/05 & 9/2/05 & 7/9/05 - WW Indicate on the building elevations the height of the building from BFE to the highest roof deck (not ceiling), as well as the height of the parapet from the roof deck of the highest roof deck. Ensure these heights are indicated in the site data table on Sheet C 1.1. 8 . 9/28/05 & 9/2/05 & 7/9/05 - WW Provide the proposed gross floor area and FAR in the site data table on Sheet C1.1 FOR ONLY THE RETAIL AND RESTAURANT FLOOR AREA (emphasis added this time). Development Review Agenda - Thursday, September 29, 2005 - Page 33 9 . 9/28/05 & 9/2/05.9/05 - WW • Show at least in concept all proposed freestanding and attached signs; showing on Sheets C2.1, C3.1 and L 1.1 the location and setback from property lines of proposed freestanding signage and on the building elevations the location of proposed attached signage. Details may come later through the building permit review process or through the submission of a Comprehensive Sign Program application. Also address existing signage, which will be required to be brought into conformance with Code requirements (provide at least photographs of existing signage). 10. 9/28/05 & 9/2/05 - WW Depict by shading or crosshatching all required parking lot interior landscaped areas and include the square footages of all areas being counted toward the interior landscaping. 11 . Indicate on the building elevations that the outdoor mechanical units are proposed on the roof. Indicate screening materials. 12 . Staff indicated on 7/8/05 that Staff will not support this request unless there are improvements to the site around the overnight accommodation building (Building A). This is still Staffs position, as reflected in the review comments for FLD2005- 09092. 13 . Provide a legal description for the subject area. 14. Sheet C1.1 - Revise, the Site data table under "density" to remove the asterik. Also remove from the bottom of the table the asterik which indicates "27 attached dwellings + 4 TDRs = 31 units ". 15 . Sheet C1.1.- Parking calculations at the bottom of the Site Data table for residential equates to 31 dwellings. Only 27 units are proposed. Revise. 16 . Parking for the restaurant is required at 15 spaces per 1,000 square feet. For a 2,500 square -foot restaurant, 38 parking spaces are required. The proposal indicates that only 18 spaces, or seven spaces per 1,000 square feet, are being provided. No parking demand study has been submitted justifying the proposed reduction to required parking for the restaurant/site. Based on the proposed uses, and since two parking spaces are assigned to the Clearwater Beach Resort proposal (FLD2005- 09092), 86 spaces are required to be provided (five for retail; 38 for restaurant; 41 for residential; two for overnight accommodation). Only 77 spaces are provided. Revise the proposal and/or submit a parking demand study for any reduction. ). Prior to the submittal of the study, the methodology of such study shall be approved by the Community Development Coordinator and shall be in accordance with accepted traffic engineering principles. The findings of the study will be used in determining whether or not deviations to the parking standards are approved. 17 . Sheet C1.1 - Fix the "Project Site" depiction on the map and aerial to coincide with property lines. Note: Aerial is too dark. 18 . Sheet C1.1 - Revise the Site Data table for "Building Height" to that actually proposed. Include the height of the parapet, if greater than 30- inches. 19. Sheet C1.1 - Remove from the Site Data table under "Density" the "4 overnight accommodations (to remain)" since these four rooms /units are under Case No. FLD2005- 09092. 20 . The sidewalks to the retail area, the lobby and the restaurant on Bayway Blvd. and to the restaurant on Parkway Drive are excessively wide. Those sidewalks on Bayway Blvd. are the same width as the driveways for vehicles, whereas sidewalks are for people. Reduce in width and location in relation to doors. 21 . The four 90- degree parking spaces south of the retention vault encroach onto the required sidewalk at the rear of the adjacent retail building and the drive aisle between the spaces at 32 feet is excessive. Revise to eliminate the encroachment and reduce the drive aisle width. 22 . The site design indicates three proposed parking spaces tucked under the ramp up to the second floor parking level. Provide details as to vertical clearance for these vehicles through cross - sections and also show on the west side elevation, which does not acknowledge these parking spaces tucked under the ramp. 23 . Site and building plans indicate an "office" next to the "shop" with a "storage" area to the rear of the "shop." Unclear what this "office" is for, since it doesn't have any clear access to it. If for the condos, still unclear why such is necessary, since there is a "clubhouse" on the ground level and a "gameroom" and "fitness center" on the second floor. Advise /revise. 24 . Since this site is within an AE flood zone, uses on the ground floor must be floodproofed. Advise how this will be accomplished from an architectural standpoint and whether some of the spaces indicated are allowable below BFE (equipment, tele /data, storage, clubhouse, etc.). Development Review Agenda - Thursday, September 29, 2005 - Page 34 25 . On the site plan for the overnight accommodation use (to remain), ittndicated that apparently the existing pool and spa are proposed to be removed and a "new pool and spa to be design and permitted by others." Since the pool area is on this proposed mixed use site, this is not indicated on the site plan for this proposal. If it is the intention to remove the existing pool and spa and replace them, need to design such now under this proposal, since we are dealing with setbacks to structures (including pool decks). If it is your desire to remove the existing and wait to another day to design the new pool, then show the existing pool removed and this area landscaped. Under this scenario, any future pool and pool deck would be required to meet a 10 -foot side setback (east, west and south). Ensure the impervious surface ratio reflects what is proposed. 26 . It is my understanding that, as part of this proposal, two of the existing parking spaces that are accessed from the drive aisle adjacent to Walgreens are to be removed and will be reoriented to be accessed from the proposed northern driveway for this mixed use project. These two spaces, which are required parking for the overnight accommodation use (FLD2005- 09092), are to be located in the northwest corner of this site. Clarify. Also, if the above is correct, how will the overnight accommodation guests access their units from these parking spaces? 27 . The proposed trash room on the ground floor is located on the eastern portion of the building and the trash staging area is proposed on the western portion of the site. With the proposed building separating the two under - building parking areas, provide information as to how the dumpsters will get from the trash room to the trash staging area, without utilizing the public sidewalks or streets. 28 . Potential condition of approval: That the final design and color of the building be consistent with the conceptual elevations submitted to, or as modified by, the CDB; 29 . Potential condition of approval: That a Unity of Title be recorded in the public records prior to the issuance of any permits; 30 . Potential condition of approval: That any future storage units on the ground floor be used for storage only, in compliance with all Federal Emergency Management Administration (FEMA) rules and guidelines. Should such storage units be proposed and approved by Staff as a Minor Revision to this approval, evidence of this restriction of use, embodied in condominium documents, homeowner's documents, deed restrictions or like forms, shall be submitted to the Building Official prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy; 31 . Potential condition of approval: That all proposed utilities (from the right -of -way to the proposed building) be placed underground. Conduits for the future undergrounding of existing utilities within the abutting right -of -way shall be installed along the entire site's street frontages prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. The applicant's representative shall coordinate the size and number of conduits with all affected utility providers (electric, phone, cable, etc.), with the exact location, size and number of conduits to be approved by the applicant's engineer and the City's Engineering Department prior to the commencement of work; 32 . Potential condition of approval: That a condominium plat be recorded prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy; 33 . Potential condition of approval: That all Parks and Recreation fees be paid prior to the issuance of any permits; 34 . Potential condition of approval: That all Fire Department requirements be met prior to the issuance of any permits; 35 . Potential condition of approval: That any future freestanding sign be a monument -style sign and be designed to match the exterior materials and color of the building. The maximum height shall be four feet, unless approved at six feet high through a Comprehensive Sign Program; 36. Sheet A -01.6 - 6th Floor - Unit numbers at the bottom of the page are incorrect, Unit 13 should be 19,. Unit 14 should be 20, Unit 15a should be 21a, and Unit 16 a should be 22a. Revise. 37 . Revise Page 1 of the application for "proposed use" - I thought the mixed use was for retail and restaurant of 3,350 square feet, not office /retail. Revise. 38 . Revise Page 1 of the application to correct the square footage of the parcel to 42,615 square feet (as shown on the Site Data table on Sheet C1.1). 39 . Revise line 4 of the Description of Request to correct "raise" to "raze." Development Review Agenda - Thursday, September 29, 2005 - Page 35 40 . Potential condition of approval: 0 That, prior to the issuance of any permits, a Minor Lot Adjustment be approved and recorded in the public records; 41 . General Applicability criteria #1 response: Correct the directions of surrounding development. Additionally, most of the townhomes are 31 feet to the midroof point and the condos at 692 Bayway is 42 feet to the roof deck. Provide more detailed information as to HOW this proposal is "in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties." 42. General Applicability criteria #4 response: There are presently 42 overnight accommodation rooms /units. Unclear as to statement that "the number of units is being reduced by 10..." as this . is not the case. Revise. 43 . General Applicability criteria #5 response: Provide information as to HOW this proposal is "consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity." 44. General Applicability criteria #6 response: Statement is made that "all sight triangles are being met," yet the building encroaches into the sight visibility triangles. Advise /revise. 45 . Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria #1 response: Provide the justification as to HOW this proposal is "otherwise impractical without deviations from the use, intensity and development standards." Be specific. 46. Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria #4 response: Provide speicific information justifying HOW this proposal is "compatible with adjacent land uses." 47 . Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria #6 response: This proposal does not include any overnight accommodation use. Revise. 48 . Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria #8 response: Provide specific information justifying HOW "flexibility in regard to required setbacks, height and off - street parking are justified by the benefits to community character and the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole." Besides setbacks, address height and parking. 49 . Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria #9 response: The proposal represents a parking reduction for the restaurant, yet no Parking Demand Study has been submitted justifying the proposed reduction. 50. Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria #10 response: Based on the mixed use calculation, and by cutting off that portion of the existing site for the overnight accommodation use, the density/intensity for this portion of the site is being maxed out. Revise. Other: No Comments Notes: This application is insufficient for the CDB. Submit revised plans and application package by noon on 11/2/05 for review by DRC on 12/8/05. Development Review Agenda - Thursday, September 29, 2005 - Page 36 i • 8/25/05 Mixed Use Calculation for Playa Del Sol Property — 678 South Gulfview Boulevard A. Property is zoned Tourist District (maximum FAR = 1.0 and maximum density = 30 du /acre) 1. Permitted FAR ...................................... ............................1.0 2. Multiply #A1 by bldg sq. ftg. of retail & restaurant proposed...........x 3,350 sf 3. Lot area required to support #A2 in the building .........................= 3,350 sf 4. Lot area ......................................... ............................... 42,615 sf 5. Subtract the lot area required to support non - residential use in the building ( #A3) ..... ............................... 3,350 sf 6. Lot area (sf) to calculate the maximum number of dwelling units ....= 39,265 sf 7. Divide #A6 ...................................... ............................... 39,265 sf 8. Land area in an acre ......................................................... 43,560 sf 9. Lot acreage for residential portion ............ .............................. = 0.901 acres 10. Multiply #A9 .................................. ............................... 0.901 acres 11. Maximum density ............................. ..............................x 30 du/acre 12. Maximum number of dwelling units permitted ........................ = 27 du r • Wells, Wayne From Wells, Wayne Sent: Thursday, July 14, 2005 8:29 AM To: Castelli, Joelle Wiley Cc: Delk, Michael; Clayton, Gina; Thompson, Neil; Watkins, Sherry Subject: Aaron Sharockman Late yesterday I spoke to Aaron Sharockman with the St. Pete Times regarding the latest round of applications submitted. He asked specifically regarding the application at 678 S. Gulfview Blvd (Playa Del Sol), why it wasn't resubmitted and its relationship to the amended Termination of Status of Nonconformity regulations (no effect; proposal is based on current density requirements). He asked also about general completeness issues with many of the projects. • • 7/9/05 Mixed Use Calculation for Playa Del Sol Property — 678 South Gulfview Boulevard A. Property is zoned Tourist District (maximum FAR = 1.0 and maximum density = 30 du /acre) 1. Permitted FAR ...................................... .....:......................1.0 2. Multiply #A1 by bldg sq. ftg. of retail & restaurant proposed.......... .x 4,015 sf 3. Lot area required to support #A2 in the building .........................= 4,015 sf 4. Lot area ......................................... ..................... ........... 47,568 sf 5. Subtract the lot area required to support non - residential use in the building ( #A3) ..... ............................... 4,015 sf 6. Lot area (sf) to calculate the maximum number of dwelling units ....= 43,553 sf 7. Divide #A6 ...................................... ............................... 43,553 sf 8. Land area in an acre ........................... ..............................— 43,560 sf 9. Lot acreage for residential portion ............ .............................. = 0.999 acres 10. Multiply #A9 .................................. ............................... 1.526 acres 11. Maximum density ............................ ..............................x 30 du/acre 12. Maximum number of dwelling units permitted ....................... = 29 du B. Transfer of Development Rights (TDR) 1. Maximum number of dwelling units permitted ......................... 29 du 2. Multiply by maximum transfer of 20% of #Bl ........................x 0_2 3. Maximum number of du to be transferred in to this property .........= 5 du C. Maximum Development Potential for Property 1. Existing Overnight Accommodation Rooms/Units (OVA) to remain... 4 rooms 2. Conversion of OVA in #C Ito dwelling units (40/30 rule) ................ 3 du 3. Maximum number of dwelling units (# Al2 ) ............................. 29 du 4. Subtract converted OVA to remain ( #C2) from #C3 ........................3 du 5. Maximum # of dwelling units ............... ............................... = 26 du 6. Add in maximum TDR (B3) .................. ............................... ± 55 du 7. Total number of dwelling units and nonresidential floor area allowable 31 du ivision of Corporations Page 1 of 2 z,lz��z Jw �t�r }si tar ; - C' ! - .Y� I Y Florida Profit SKTEL, INC. PRINCIPAL ADDRESS 5649 49 ST N ST PETE FL 33709 MAILING ADDRESS 5649 49 ST N ST PETE FL 33709 Document Number FEI Number Date Filed P00000040855 593641435 04/20/2000 State Status Effective Date FL ACTIVE NONE Last Event Event Date Filed Event Effective Date AMENDMENT 02/23/2004 NONE Registered Agent Name & Address PATEL, HARISH 5649 49 ST N ST PETE FL 33709 Officer /Director Detail Name & Address Title PATEL, HARISH 5649 49TH ST N PS SAINT PETERSBURG FL 33709 PATEL, RAMEJH 5649 49 ST N D ST PETE FL 33709 http: / /www. sunbiz.org /scripts /cordet. exe ?a 1= DETFIL &n 1= P0000004085 5 &n2 =NAMF WD... 7/7/2005 -Division of Corporations . • Page 2 of 2 Annual Reports Report Year Filed Date :jq 2003 03/17/2003 2004 05/10/2004 2005 02/09/2005 Previous Filing Return to List Next Filing View Events No Name History Information Document Images Listed below are the images available for this filing. 02/09/2005 -- ANN REP/UNIFORM BUS REP 05/10/2004 -- ANN REP/UNIFORM BUS REP 02/23/2004 -- Amendment 03/17/2003 -- ANN REP/UNIFORM BUS REP 03/29/2002 -- COR - ANN REP/UNIFORM BUS REP 06/21/2001 -- ANN REP/UNIFORM BUS REP 04/20/2000 -- Domestic Profit THIS IS NOT OFFICIAL RECORD; SEE DOCUMENTS IF QUESTION OR CONFLICT Corporations, Inquiry Corporations � delta ; http : / /www. sunbiz. org /scripts /cordet. exe? a 1= DETFIL &n 1 =P 000000408 5 5 &n2 =NAMF WD... 7/7/2005 ..Pinellas County Property Appr,,^ r Information: 17 29 15 58918 000 0046 Page 2 of 8 17 I 29 / 15 1 51755 ! 040 / 0000 07- Jul -2005 Jim Smith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 17:22:24 Ownership Information Non- Residential Property Address, Use, and Sales SKTEL INC OBK: 10971 OPG: 0349 678 S GULFUIEW BLVD CLEARWATER FL 33767 -2642 EVAC: A EUAC Comparable sales value as Prop Addr: 678 S GULFUIEW BLVD of Jan 1, 2004, based on Census Tract: .00 sales from 2002 - 2003: 0 Sale Date OR Book /Page Price (Qual /UnQ) Vac /Imp Plat Information 7 /2,000 10,9711 349 1,535,000 (Q) I 1994: Book Pgs - 0 /0 0/ 0 0 { } 0000: Book Pgs - 0 /0 0/ 0 0 { ) 0000: Book Pgs - 0 /0 0/ 0 0 { } 2004 Value EXEMPTIONS Just /Market: 2,228,500 Homestead: NO Ownership % .000 Govt Exem: NO Use %: .000 Assessed /Cap: 2,228,500 Institutional Exem: NO Tax Exempt %: .000 Historic Exem: 0 Taxable: 2,228,500 Agricultural: 0 2004 Tax Information District: Cu Seawall: Frontage: Clearwater View: 04 Millage: 22.9694 Land Size Unit Land Land Land Front x Depth Price Units Meth 04 Taxes: 51,187.31 1) 270 x 121 50.00 32, 670.00 S Special Tax .00 2) 60 x 127 50.00 7,620.00 S 3) 63 x 121 11000. 00 . 18 A Without the Save -Our -Homes 4) 0 x 0 .00 .00 cap, 2004 taxes will be 5) 0 x 0 .00 .00 51, 187.31 6) 0 x 0 .00 . 00 Without any exemptions, 2004 taxes will be 51, 187. 31 Short Legal LIFETIME OF VACATIONS (UNRECORDED T/S CONDO) Description ALL UNITS (FKA: LOTS 9,10, 11,12,13 & 15 BLK B OF Building Information http: / /pao.co.pinellas. fl.us/htbin/cgi- click ?o =1 &a =1 &b =1 &c =1 &r= .16 &s= 4 &t3 =1 &u= 0 &p... 7/7/2005 Piraellas County Property Appror Information: 17 29 15 58918 000 04 Page 3 of 8 . Build ng___I . Bulding2 ..Building 3 • Building 4 Building #1 17 / 29 / 15 / 51 755 / 400 / 0000 :01 07- Jul -2005 Jim Smith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 17:22:24 Commercial Card 01 of 4 Improvement Type: Hotel /Hotel < 4 St Property Address: 678 S OULFUIEW BLVD Prop Use: 242 Land Use: 04 Structural E1�m�nts Foundation Special Footing Floor System Structural Slab Exterior Wall Conc Block /Stucco Height Factor 0 Party Wall None Structural Frame Concrete Reinforced Roof Frame Reinforced Concrete Roof Cover Built Up /Composition Cabinet & Mill Average Floor Finish Carpet Combination Interior Finish Drywall Total Units 0 Heating & Air Heating &Cooling Pckg Fixtures 36 Bath Tile Floor + Half Wall Electric Average Description Factor Shape Factor Rectangle 1) Quality Average 1.00 Year Built 11982 Effective Age 18 Other Depreciation 0 Function Depreciation 0 Economic Depreciation 0 Sub Aromas Commsrcl.al Extra F4Batur4B s Description Factor Area Value Description Factor Area 1) Base Area 1.00 3,348 7) .00 0 2) Open Porch .30 2,120 8) .00 0 3) Utility .40 64 9) .00 0 4) Carport .20 4,408 10) .00 0 5) Upper Stry Base Area .90 3,348 11) .00 0 6) SPA /JAC /HT .00 0 12) .00 0 Commsrcl.al Extra F4Batur4B s Building #2 http:// Pao.co.pinellas.fl.uslhtbinlcgi- click ?o =1 &a =1 &b =1 &c =1 &r= .16 &s= 4 &t3 =1 &u= 0 &p... 7/7/2005 Description Dimensions Price Units Value RCD Year 1) TENNISCT 40,000.00 1 40,000 17,600 1,982 2) POOL 25,000.00 1 25,000 111000 1,982 3) COHC PAVE 2000SF 3.00 21000 6,000 61000 999 4) PND /FHT /WF 1,000.00 1 1,000 1,000 999 5) SHUFBDCT 1,000.00 1 1,000 1,000 1,982 6) SPA /JAC /HT 6,000.00 1 61000 2,640 1,982 TOTAL RECORD VALUE: 39,240 Building #2 http:// Pao.co.pinellas.fl.uslhtbinlcgi- click ?o =1 &a =1 &b =1 &c =1 &r= .16 &s= 4 &t3 =1 &u= 0 &p... 7/7/2005 Pinellas County Property App 6r Information: 17 29 15 58918 000 0016 Page 4 of 8 17 / 29 / 15 / 51755 / 000 / 0000 :02 07 -Jul -2005 Jim Smith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 17:22:24 Commercial Card 02 of 4 Improvement Type: Motel /Hotel < 4 St Property Address: 678 S GULFUIEW BLVD Prop Use: 242 Land Use: 04 S-truc�ural E1sm�nts Foundation Special Footing Floor System Structural Slab Exterior Wall Conc Block /Stucco Height Factor 0 Party Wall Hone Structural Frame Concrete Reinforced Roof Frame Reinforced Concrete Roof Cover Built Up /Composition Cabinet & Mill Average Floor Finish Carpet Combination Interior Finish Drywall Total Units 0 Heating & Air Heating &Cooling Pckg Fixtures 48 Bath Tile Floor t Half Wall Electric Average Description Factor Shape Factor Rectangle 1) Quality Average 1.00 Year Built 11982 Effective Age 18 Other Depreciation 0 Function Depreciation 0 Economic Depreciation 0 Sub Aromas Commercial Extra Features Description Dimensions Description Factor Area RCD Description Factor Area 1) Base Area 1.00 4,208 7) . 00 0 2) Open Porch .30 3,936 8) .00 0 3) Utility .40 512 9) .00 0 4) Carport .20 4,000 10) . 00 0 5) Upper Stry Base Area .90 4,208 11) .00 0 6) .00 0 12) .00 0 Commercial Extra Features Description Dimensions Price Units Value RCD Year 1) .00 0 0 0 0 2) .00 0 0 0 0 3) .00 0 0 0 0 4) .00 0 0 0 0 5) .00 0 0 0 0 6) .00 0 0 0 0 TOTAL RECORD VALUE: 0 Building #3 http:// pao.co.pinellas.fl.uslhtbinlcgi- click ?o =1 &a =1 &b =1 &c =l &r= .16 &s= 4 &t3 =1 &u= 0 &p... 7/7/2005 Pinellas County Property App *r Information: 17 29 15 58918 000 06 Page 5 of 8 17 / 29 / 15 / 51755 / 000 / 0000 :03 07- Jul -2005 Jim Smith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 17:22:25 Commercial Card 03 of 4 Improvement Type: Motel /Hotel < 4 St Property Address: 678 S GULFUIEW BLVD Prop Use: 242 Land Use: 04 Structural E 1Bment s Foundation Special Footing Floor System Structural Slab Exterior Wall Conc Block /Stucco Height Factor 0 Party Wall Hone Structural Frame Concrete Reinforced Roof Frame Reinforced Concrete Roof Cover Built Up /Composition Cabinet & Mill Average Floor Finish Carpet Combination Interior Finish Drywall Total Units 0 Heating & Air Heating &Cooling Pckg Fixtures 36 Bath Tile Floor + Half Wall Electric Average Description Factor Shape Factor Rectangle 1) Quality Average 1.00 Year Built 11982 Effective Age 18 Other Depreciation 0 Function Depreciation 0 Economic Depreciation 0 Sub Aromas Commercial E x t r a F e at ur s Description Dimensions Description Factor Area RCD Description Factor Area 1) Base Area 1.00 3,348 7) . 00 0 2) Open Porch .30 2,120 8) .00 0 3) Utility .40 64 9) .00 0 4) Carport .20 4,408 10) .00 0 5) Upper Stry Base Area .90 3,348 11) .00 0 6) .00 0 12) .00 0 Commercial E x t r a F e at ur s Description Dimensions Price Units Value RCD Year 1) .00 0 0 0 0 2) .00 0 0 0 0 3) .00 0 0 0 0 4) .00 0 0 0 0 5) .00 0 0 0 0 6) .00 0 0 0 0 TOTAL RECORD VALUE: 0 Building #4 http: // pao.co.pinellas.fl.us /htbin/cgi- click ?o =1 &a =1 &b =1 &c =1 &r= .16 &s= 4 &t3 =1 &u= 0 &p... 7/7/2005 Piwiellas County Property Appr r Information: 17 29 15 58918 000 00 Page 6 of 8 17 / 29 / 15 / 51755 / 000 / 4000 :04 07- Jul -2005 Jim Smith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 17:22:26 Commercial Card 04 of 4 Improvement Type: Motel /Hotel C 4 St Property Address: 678 S 6ULFUIEW BLVD Prop Use: 242 Land Use: 04 Structural E1�msn�s Foundation Special Footing Floor System Structural Slab Exterior Wall Cone Block /Stucco Height Factor 0 Party Wall None Structural Frame Concrete Reinforced Roof Frame Reinforced Concrete Roof Cover Built Up /Composition Cabinet & Mill Average Floor Finish Carpet Combination Interior Finish Drywall Total Units 0 Heating & Air Heating &Cooling Pckg Fixtures 18 Bath Tile Floor + Half Wall Electric Average Description Factor Shape Factor Rectangle 1) Quality Average 1.00 Year Built 1,982 Effective Age 18 Other Depreciation 0 Function Depreciation 0 Economic Depreciation 0 Sub Areas C omm e r (-- i al E x t r a F sat ur c s Description Dimensions Description Factor Area RCD Description Factor Area 1) Base Area 1.00 1,438 7) .00 0 2) Open Porch .30 788 8) .00 0 3) Utility .40 64 9) .00 0 4) Upper Stry Base Area .90 2,220 10) .00 0 5) 6) .00 0 11) .00 0 6) .00 0 12) .00 0 C omm e r (-- i al E x t r a F sat ur c s Description Dimensions Price Units Value RCD Year 1) .00 0 0 0 0 2) .00 0 0 0 0 3) .00 0 0 0 0 4) .00 0 0 0 0 5) .00 0 0 0 0 6) .00 0 0 0 0 TOTAL RECORD VALUE: 0 Map With Property Address (non- vacant) 0101111111� http:// pao.co.pinellas.fl.uslhtbinlcgi- click ?o =1 &a =1 &b =1 &c =l &r= .16 &s= 4 &t3 =1 &u= 0 &p... 7/7/2005 Pinellas County Property App Information: 17 29 15 58918 000 0?b R 47AN sh- w 1/8 Mile Aerial Photograph (2002) *58918 Page 7 of 8 c_ 0 http: // pao.co.pinellas.fl.us /htbin/cgi- click ?o =1 &a =1 &b =1 &c =1 &r= .16 &s= 4 &t3 =1 &u= 0 &p... 7/7/2005 P_;iellFs Count - Property Ao _nfornatior_: 17 29 15 58913 000 C0 ?age 8 of 8 Pinellas County Property Appraiser Parcel Information http2l pao. co. pinetas. fl. L-sl tbin/ :�g i- dic- k? o= 1 &a= l &b= 1 &c= 1 &r=.lE&s= 4&t3 =1 zu= C, &p... 7/72005 0 Page 1 of 1 Wells, Wayne From: FOWLERARCH @aol.com Sent: Thursday, April 14, 2005 5:32 PM To: Cyndi.tarapani @myclearwater.co Cc: Wells, Wayne Subject: Clearwater Beach Resort Redevelopment Cyndi, Our client and I have been meeting with Wayne over several weeks to develop a strategy for the redevelopment of the existing Clearwater Beach Resort time share operation into a mixed use project that has a restaurant, shops or medical offices, and 32 condo units. One issue that has complicated the matter is the outstanding time share vacations that have not been purchased by the owners, as of yet, and how to accommodate those individuals in the new structure until such time that their time shares can be purchased. feel that we have a plan to resolve this and Wayne has asked that we run it by you and get your input before we proceed too much further. In that light, would you please have Angel arrange for a short meeting, with Wayne, that we might do a brief "show and tell' and get your opinion. Any afternoon, after 4:00 would be fine—Thanks. Steve Fowler 449 -2021 5/10/2006 p;4 CITY OF CLEARWATER NOTICE OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD PUBLIC HEARINGS The Community Development Board of the City of Clearwater, Florida, will hold public hearings on Tuesday, February 21, 2006, beginning at 1:00 p.m., in the City Council Chambers, in City Hall, 3rd floor, 112 South Osceola Ave, Clearwater, Florida, to consider the following requests: NOTE: All persons wishing to address an item need to be present at the BEGINNING of the meeting. Those cases that are not contested by the applicant, staff, neighboring property owners, etc. will be placed on a consent agenda and approved by a single vote at the beginning of the meeting. SKTEL Inc (Playa Del Sol. Resort) is requesting Flexible Development approval to permit a mixed use (3,650 sq ft of office floor area, 27 attached dwellings and 4 overnight accommodation rooms /units) with reductions to the front (north along Bayway Blvd) setback from 15 ft to 9.6 ft (to building), from 15 ft to 5 ft (to existing pavement) and from 15 ft to zero ft (to trash staging area), reductions to the front (east along Parkway Dr) setback from 15 ft to 10.3 ft (to building) and from 15 ft to zero ft (to dumpster enclosure), reductions to the side (west) setback from 10 ft to 5 ft (to pool and patio decks) and from 10 ft to zero ft (to existing. pavement and sidewalk), reductions to the side (south) setback from 10 ft to 7.4 ft (to building), from 10 ft to zero ft (to dumpster enclosure), and from 10 ft to zero ft (to existing sidewalk and pavement), a reduction to the side (east) setback from 10 ft to 5 ft (to pool deck) and an increase to building ht from 35 ft to 85.08 ft (to roof deck) with an additional 5.67 ft for perimeter parapets (from roof deck), as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Sec 2- 803.C. [Proposed Use: Mixed use (3,650 sq .ft of office floor area, 27 attached dwellings and 4 overnight accommodation rooms /units)] at 678 S. Gulfview Blvd, Lifetime of Vacations (unrecorded T/S Condo) all units, (FKA: Blk B, Lots 9 -13 & 15). Assigned Planner: Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Planner III. FLD2005 -07071 Interested parties may appear and be heard at the hearing or file written notice of approval or objection with the Planning Director or City Clerk prior to the hearing. Any person who decides to appeal any decision made by the Board or Council, with respect to any matter considered at such hearings, will need to request a record of the proceedings and, for such purpose, may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based per Florida Statute 286.0105. Community Development Code Sec 4 -206 states that party status shall be granted by the Board in quasi-judicial cases if the person requesting such status demonstrates that s/he is substantially affected. Party status entitles parties to personally testify, present evidence, argument and witnesses, cross - examine witnesses, appeal the decision and speak on reconsideration requests, and needs to be requested and obtained during the case discussion before the CDB. An oath will be administered swearing in all persons giving testimony in quasi-judicial public hearing cases. If you wish to speak at the meeting, please wait to be recognized, then state and spell your name and provide your address. Persons without party status speaking before the CDB shall be limited to three minutes unless an individual is representing a group in which case the Chairperson may authorize a reasonable amount of time up to 10 minutes. Five days prior to the meeting, staff reports and recommendations on the above requests will be available for review by interested parties between the hours of 8:30 a.m. and 4:30 p.m., 0 weekdays, at the City of Clearwater, Planning Department, 100 S. Myrtle Ave., Clearwater, FL 33756. Please contact the case presenter, at 562 -4567 to discuss any questions or concerns about the project and/or to better understand the proposal and review the site plan. Michael Delk Planning Director City of Clearwater P.O. Box 4748, Clearwater, FL 33758 -4748 NOTE: Applicant or representative must be present at the hearing. Cynthia E. Goudeau, CMC City Clerk YOU ARE BEING SENT THIS NOTICE IF YOU ARE THE APPLICANT OR OWN PROPERTY WITHIN 200 FT OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY. A COPY OF THIS AD IN LARGE PRINT IS AVAILABLE IN OFFICIAL RECORDS AND LEGISLATIVE SERVICES. ANY PERSON WITH A DISABILITY REQUIRING REASONABLE ACCOMMODATION IN ORDER TO PARTICIPATE IN THIS MEETING SHOULD CALL (727) 562 -4093 WITH THEIR REQUEST. Ad: 02/06/06 rLD2005 -07071 = 10 696 S GULFVIEW BLVD LLC ALBER, VIRGINIA L 965 S BAYSHORE BLVD 675 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 604 SAFETY HARBOR FL 34695 - 4217 CLEARWATER FL 33767 2666 AMOROSO, DANIEL F AMOROSO, EDWINA 675 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 302 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2646 ANASTASOPOULOS, ELIAS ANASTASOPOULOS, ANASTASIOS 630 S GULFVIEW BLVD CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2642 ANTHONY, CRAIG W ANTHONY, BARBARA B 724 BAYWAY BLVD # A -1 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2611 BARBI ERE, JOYCE L TRUST 155 BAYOU ST MARQUETTE MI 49855 - 9101 BAYWAY SHORES CONDO ASSN INC PO BOX 3882 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 8882 BEL CREST CONDO INC 706 BAYWAY BLVD CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2609 BESSINGER, ROBERT N BESSINGER, ELAINE A 716 BAYWAY BLVD # 6 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2664 BRADLEY, FELICIA N 284 BSB CMR 452 PO BOX 2563 APO AE 09045 - AMOROSO, DANIEL AMOROSO, JEAN 201 WILTSHIRE RD WYNNEWOOD PA 19096 - 3332 ANASTASOPOULOS, ELIAS ANASTASOPOULOS, HELEN 1600 GULF BLVD # PHNO 1 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2973 BALKIN, JAMES M 640 BAYWAY BLVD # 206 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2604 BARBIERE, MICHAEL J BELANGER, JILL R 165 BAYOU ST MARQUETTE MI 49855 - 9101 BAYWAY TOWNHOMES HOMEOWNERS AS 656 BAYWAY BLVD CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2668 BENDERLY, ZVI THE 875 W END AVE NEW YORK NY 10025 - 4919 BLAKELY, JOSEPH E THE BLAKELY, BARBARA THE 31 ISLAND WAY APT 104 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2205 BRANDT, STEPHEN W BRANDT, TERESA P 513 RIVERH ILLS bR TAMPA FL 33617 - 7225 0 ALDINGER, GUENTER ALDINGER, DAGMAR SCHWALBENWEG 4 74395 MUNDELSHEIM 00004 - GERMANY AMOS, THOMAS E AMOS, FRANCES C 4079 AQUARINA ST WATERFORD MI 48329 - 2117 ANASTASOPOULOS, ELIAS POLITIS, GREGORY C 630 S GULFVIEW BLVD CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2642 BARBER, WILLIAM R BARBER, BARBARA N 675 GULFVIEW BLVD # 601 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2666 BAYSIDE CONDO ASSN INC 800 BAYWAY BLVD CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2615 BEACH FUN 1 LLC 246 2ND ST N SAFETY HARBOR FL 34695 3610 BERKOVSKY, PETER BERKOVSKY, HELGA 675 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 508 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2666 BOSTROM, ERIK SUNDQUIST, BRITTA 675 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 505 CLEARWATER BCH 33467 - BROWN, LARRY J GONZALEZ, PATRICIA M 249 173RD AVE N REDINGTON BEACH FL 33708 - 1330 CAPELUTO FAMILY PTNSHP CAPELUTO FAMILY PTNSHP CARTER, DONALD NACE L 28050 US HIGHWAY 19 N STE 100 CAPELUTO, 4757 FRANK LUKE DR CLEARWATER FL 33761 - 2600 28050 US HIGHWAY 19 N STE 100 ADDISON TX 75001 - 3202 CLEARWATER FL 33761 - 2600 CASEY, PAULA R CHAMBERS, ANN M CHENOWETH, JOHN CRAIG 724 BAYWAY BLVD # A -3 15 GRAY BIRCH TRL 656 BAYWAY BLVD # 2 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2612 MADISON WI 53717 - 1505 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2668 Clearwater Beach Association CLEARWATER BEACH SALES CLEARWATER GRANDE DEV LLC Jay Keyes CENTER E 5 100 Devon Drive 20001 GULF BLVD STE 5 INDIAN SHORES FL 20001 GULF BLVD ST E 5 - 2417 Clearwater, FL 33767 INDIAN SHORES FL 33785 - 2417 Clearwater Neighborhoods Coalition Clearwater Point 1 Beach House 16 Clearwater Point 3 Marina House 17 Sondra Kerr, President 845 Bayway Blvd 868 Bayway Blvd #212 P.O. Box 8204 Clearwater, FI 33767 Clearwater, FI 33767 Clearwater, FL 33758 Clearwater Point 4 Island House 1 Clearwater Point 5 Admiral House 19 Clearwater Point 7 Inc, Yacht House 895 S Gulfview Blvd 825 S Gulfview Blvd #104 851 Bayway Blvd Clearwater, FI 33767 Clearwater, FI 33767 Clearwater, FI 33767 Clearwater Point 8 Shipmaster, Sail CLEARWATER POINT TOWNHOUSE CLINKSCALE, ROBERT M 800 S Gulfview Blvd CON 800 BAYWAY BLVD # 14 Clearwater, FI 33767 716 BAYWAY BLVD CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2658 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2664 CLINKSCALE, ROBERT M CLINKSCALE, ROBERT M CLOW, CUSICK CLINKSCALE, MICHAEL J CLINKSCALE, MICHAEL JOHNSON, MARQUERITE 800 BAYWAY BLVD # 26 800 BAYWAY BLVD # 14 675 GULFVIEW BLVD # 905 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2660 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2658 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2678 CLOW, CUSIK CONTINENTAL TOWERS INC CONWAY, E P FAM LTD PTNSP PALLS, BYRON P 675 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 206 PO BOX 3318 675 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 905 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2646 BOARDMAN OH 44513 - 3318 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2678 CORMEY, WALTER P CUNNINGHAM, IRENE A THE CURRENT OWNER CORMEY, CAROLYN M 10900 W BLUEMOUND RD # 202 675 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 307 675 GULFVIEW BLVD # 301 MILWAUKEE WI 53226 - 4145 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2657 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2646 DARL LLC DE VITA, MICHAEL J DE VOS, ROBERT HELEN C 1825 PIPERS MEADOW DR DE VITA, PO BOX 476 PALM HARBOR FL 34683 - 6156 675 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 205 CLEARWATER FL 33757 - 0476 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2646 DELELLIS, JAMES P DETTY, G WILLIAM THE DIGIOVANNI PARTNERS BAYWAY DELELLIS, RUTH A IVERSON, BRITT L LLC 692 BAYWAY BLVD # 402 PO BOX 479 163 BAYSIDE DR CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2667 CLEARWATER FL 33757 - 0479 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2502 DORMER, JAMES J DORMER, DORIS J 675 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 1103 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2645 E & A PROPERTIES LLC 1600 GULF BLVD # PH1 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2973 FURLETTI, ROBERT FURLETTI, HELEN A 182 LENOX AVE NEW MILFORD NJ 07646 - 2618 GOMEZ REAL PROPERTY TRUST 1806 BREEZY TRL VERONA WI 53593 - 7901 GRGURICH, JOHN GRGURICH, KATICA 5021 W CAROLL AVE SKOKIE IL 60077 - 2202 HANSELMAN, MARGARET M 206 PALMETTO RD CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 1430 HAYCOX, KAREN 450 NORTH END AVE # 12A NEW YORK NY 10282 - 1108 HODGE, HARRY SHERRARD, HENRY THE 845 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 204 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 3012 HOUGEN, RANDALL B HOUGEN, VICTOR L 3001 HOUGEN DR SWARTZ CREEK MI 48473 - 7935 • 0 DOULAS, GARIFALIA E & A INC 40 -417 HARDING BLVD W 1600 GULF BLVD # PH1 RICHMOND HILL ON L4C 9S5 00030 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2973 CANADA FLINT IMP FUND THE 706 BAYWAY BLVD CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2609 GARBIS, ANTHONY GARBIS, ANTOINETTE 204S VINE ST HINSDALE IL 60521 - 4042 GRACILLA, MARY L 302 CLAY FURNACE RD SHARPSVILLE PA 16150 - 3104 GRUBER, CRAIG M 10 PAPAYA ST APT 502 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2040 HARBORSIDE CONDO LLC 706 BAYWAY BLVD CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2609 HECK, JAMES D 1982 COLEDONIAN CT GREENWOOD IN 46143 - 8249 HOLT, SUE E THE 257 UNION ST EAST BRIDGEWATER MA 02333 - 1508 Housh Ghovaee Northside Engineering Services, Inc 601 Cleveland Street, Suite 930 Clearwater, FL 33755 FOLEY, BETHANY A FOLEY, JOHN R 640 BAYWAY BLVD # 306 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2605 GIAMMATTEI, CAROL GIAMMATTEI; GUIDO 801 TWELVE OAKS PKWY WOODSTOCK IL 60098 - 4317 GREAT WHITE INVESTMENTS LLC 306 HARBOR DR INDIAN ROCKS BEACH FL 33785 - 3135 HANKINS, JOHN M 640 BAYWAY BLVD # 201 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2606 HARBORSIDE CONDO LLC 9390 N GLORIA AVE STE 104 TAMPA FL 33612 - HODGE & SUN GETAWAY 800 BAYWAY BLVD # 20 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2659 HORNE, THOMAS L PO BOX 3009 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 8009 HOWELL, LESLIE F JR TRUST HOWELL, LESLIE F JR THE 656 BAYWAY BLVD # 4 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2668 HUBER, NANCY L ISLAND CLUB CONDO ASSN INC ISLAND KEY DEV LLC 20001 GULF BLVD 2789 BRIDLE RD INDIAN ROCKS BEACH FL 33785.- 19535 GULF BLVD STE B BLOOMFIELD MI 48304 - 1609 2472 INDIAN SHORES FL 33785 - 2240 ISLAND KEY OF CLEARWATER BEACH 692 BAYWAY BLVD CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2662 KALLAS, LELA 4 BAY VIEW CIR SALEM MA 01970 - 2630 KELTY, JAMES SR KELTY, SUSAN 3994 NAPIER RD CANTON MI 48187 - 4628 LAVDAS, DIMITROS LAVDAS, THALIA 724 BAYWAY BLVD # A -2 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2611 LEE, NADYNE S 908 WALLACE LEITCHFIELD KY 42754 - 1479 LOVITZ, JULIUS L REVOCABLE TRU LOVITZ, JULIUS L BEN 675 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 501 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2657 MANCUSO, ROBERT H 656 BAYWAY BLVD # 10 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2668 MASSELL, GEORGE M II 716 BAYWAY BLVD # 2 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2664 MC KERROW, DONALD C THE 675 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 1102 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2645 MEYER, JAMES W MEYER, LINDA K 675 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 401 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2657 JANIS LIVING TRUST 10300 S LONG AVE OAK LAWN I L 60453 - 4643 KAMINSKAS, STEVEN W KAMINSKAS, LEISA 4N160 HAWTHORNE BENSENVILLE IL 60106 - 2909 JOHNSON, PAMELA B 4021 AUDUBON DR LARGO FL 33771 - 3309 KELLER, ELIZABETH M 675 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 802 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2647 KINNEY, JAMES H KRITICOS, SAM KINNEY, BARBARA J KRITICOS, ELIZABETH 656 BAYWAY BLVD # 8 757 MANDALAY CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2668 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1433 LE COMPTE, LENA LE, SANG VAN 675 S .GULFVIEW BLVD # 1105 NGUYEN, DUNG THI CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2645 3896 LAKE BLVD N CLEARWATER FL 33762 - 5421 LENART, TED THE LINARES, ANTHONY LENART, MARIA THE 640 BAYWAY BLVD # 105 LENART FAMILY TRUST CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2606 625 S GULFVIEW BLVD CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2643 MAGUIRE, DOMINIC L MAKRIS, COSTAS 2 -5 5TH OLD CASTLE GARDENS MAKRIS, STELLA GLASGOW 6444SP 00012 - 2110 DREW ST SCOTLAND CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 3231 MARKOS, CHRIS MARTIN, GARY M 675 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 1204 MARTIN, BERNICE J CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2679 1046 ARDEN DR VILLA HILLS KY 41017 - 3727 MC DONALD, ROBERT J MC GEE, JOHN P MC DONALD, MARY PO BOX 3455 675 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 807 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 8455 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2678 MC MULLIN, DONALD J MENDELSOHN, HARVEY H MC MULLIN, MARGARET U THE MENDELSOHN, CATHERINE 500 JOHN F KENNEDY BLVD # 628 675 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 1202 WILDWOOD NJ 08260 - 5891 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2679 MICHAEL, ANN M EST MILLER, FRANK 7041 BRIDGETOWN RD 675 S GULFVIEW BLVD #1008 CINCINNATI OH 45248 - 2005 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2645 0 • MISKEL, ELIZABETH V MONCRIEFZ, J SCOTT MONCRIEFF SUZANNE S MORAITIS, CHRIST , 675 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 702 675 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 705 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2647 1570 WERNER DR CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2647 ALVA FL 33920 - 3545 MORELLI, MARY A MOSCA, LANA L NAKIS, MICHELINE 675 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 506 1875 MCCAULEY RD 675 S GULFVIEW BLVD# 804 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2666 CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 1512 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2647 NASSIF, FREDERICK J NASSIF, FREDERICK J NICHOLSON, FAY A 675 GGULFVIEW BLVD # 906 NASSIF, JANET L NICHOLSON, CHARLES W CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2678 675 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 1005 948 RIVERSIDE RIDGE CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2645 TARPON SPRINGS FL 34688 - 8800 OFSTEDAL, IRVIN J ORGETTAS, MICHAEL THE PALLS, BYRON P OFSTEDAL, LUCILLE 74 CENTRAL ST PALLS, BEATRICE K 675 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 403 PEABODY MA 01960 - 4357 675 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 1002 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2657 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2645 PANUTHOS, PANIAGOTTA TRUST PARR, VINCENT E PATRICE ISLAND KEY LLC PANUTHOS, PANIAGOTTA THE PARR, LUNEY A 2621 PATRICE CT 675 GULFVIEW BLVD # 706 633 OAKLAND MURRYSVILLE PA 15668 - 1756 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2647 TAMPA FL 33617 - PEDZISZ, ANTONI PETRIK, CONSTANCE C THE POLEMENAKOS, SOTIROS PEDZISZ, HALINA POLEMENAKOS, THEOHARI 675 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 308 8422 W DOHANNA DR CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2657 352 ATLANTIC AVE NILES IL 60714 - MARBLEHEAD MA 01945 - 2732 RAMSEY CLAIR J PRICE, TIME RAU, JOHN R RAMSEY BARBARA M 781 69TH AVE S 1297 LEXINGTON AVE # 4 ST PETERSBURG FL 33705 - 6247 1406 SAINT GOTTHARD AVE NEW YORK NY 10128 - 1148 ANCHORAGE AK 99508 - 5052 REED, MARTIN J ROANE- BLAKER, CATHERINE ROOTH, CRAIG J 656 BAYWAY BLVD # 105 ROANS, PATRICIA ANN 675 GULFVIEW BLVD S # 1203 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2668 716 BAYWAY BLVD # 5 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2679 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2664 ROY, JOHN B RUSSELL, SHELDON P RUSSO, KAREN B ROY JANE S RUSSO ANTHONY J ' 1415 MENDOTA HEIGHTS RD ' 675 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 1001 MENDOTA HEIGHTS MN 55120 - 1002 675 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 901 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2678 CLEARWATER BEACH FL 33767 - 2678 RYAN, STEPHEN M SAILMATE INVESTMENTS LLC SAUNDERS, WILLIAM R 58 FOXROCK AVE 1380 GULF BLVD # 808 SAUNDERS, SHIRLEY M DUBLIN 18 00003 - CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2821 724 BAYWAY BLVD # B -2 IRELAND CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2612 • SCHAFFER, GEORGE A 675 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 406 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2657 SCOTT, MICHAEL V 656 BAYWAY BLVD # 3 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2668 SELIMAJ, ISUF WILLIAMSBRIDGE STATION PO BOX 961 BRONX NY 10467 - 0726 SHERRARD, HENRY J THE HODGE, HARRY E THE 845 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 204 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 3012 SILVERMAN, DIANE 2121 BATHURST ST # 620 TORONTO ON M5N 2P3 00030 - CANADA STAPP, ARVIL STAPP, MARTINE M 929 LORA LN TARPON SPRINGS FL 34688 - 9055 SUNSPREE GREEN LLC 50 N WATER ST SOUTH NORWALK CT 06854 - 2228 VLAHOS, ELAINE 32 MAPLE ST WEST BABYLON NY 11704 - 7718 WARNER HOSPITALITY 12016 FERN BLOSSOM DR GIBSONTON FL 33534 - 5640 SCHLUTER, ALVIN L 675 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 602 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2666 SEAWAKE MOTEL LTD 691 S GULFVIEW BLVD CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2643 SGROI, RALPH O SGROI, LAURA J 2781 ST ANDREWS BLVD TARPON SPRINGS FL 34688 - 6312 SHEWA, MANOJ H DIPI, MASUMA A 675 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 306 CLEARWATER .FL 33767 - 2657 SKTEL INC 678 S GULFVIEW BLVD CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2642 STRAWN, KIRK C 1811 N FREMONT ST CHICAGO IL 60614 - 5004 TU, DUANHUA ZHANG, FENG 675 GULFVIEW BLVD # 803 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2647 VUJIC, GROZDAN 3321 SAWMILL VALLEY DR MISSISSAUGA ON L5L 3C9 CANADA WAZIO, IRENE WAZIO, EUGENE 5511 S KOMENSKY ST CHICAGO IL 60629 - 4415 • SCHULMAN, SUSAN H SCHULMAN, HELEN P 210 CARYL WAY OLDSMAR FL 34677 - 2265 SEITZ, ROBERT C SEITZ, GRETCHEN A 23460 W PARK COLOMBO CALABASAS CA 91302 - 2813 SHEFFIELD, JAMES S SHEFFIELD, LINDA L PO BOX 3296 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 8296 SIFAKIS, TARYN 6280 SHACKELFORD TER ALEXANDRIA VA 22312 - 1728 SPAGNOLA, JOHN SPAGNOLA, ROSALYN C 675 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 204 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2646 SULLIVAN, LETICIA BRITO SULLIVAN, JASON D 17113 RAINBOW TER ODESSA FL 33556 - 2107 VAN FLEET, BRUCE VAN FLEET, DAWN 2061 LOMBARD ST PHILADELPHIA PA 19146 - 1314 WAGNER, WILLIAM H WAGNER, JOSEPHINE C 00030- 559 LORING VILLAGE CT ORANGE PARK FL 32073 - 2960 WEG, KARL WEG, MARIA 1501 GULF BLVD # 807 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2903 WILBUR, RAYMOND JOSEPH III WOLFE, JOHN M WOLMANRANS, HENRY HILL & JACKI WILBUR, PATSY R 501 ERIE AVE WOLMANRANS, HENRY HILL 14915 EVERSHINE ST TAMPA FL 33606 - 3643 675 GULFVIEW BLVD # 1201. TAMPA FL 33624 - 2238 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2679 i WOODS, NOEL D 640 BAYWAY BLVD # 305 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2605 ZEH, ROSALIE M 1310 GULF BLVD # 3 -F CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2859 ZAREMBA, THOMAS S 1 SEAGATE STE 999 TOLEDO OH 43604 - 4504 ZEIER, NORBERT G ZEIER, MARGARET E 675 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 503 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2666 ZEFELIPPO, MARIA R 675 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 708 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2647 ZHUN, ELLEN M FAMILY TRUST 675 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 1005 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2645 Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2006 6:20 PM To: 'Ihowell1 @tampabay.rr.com' Subject: Staff Report for Playa Del Sol, 678 S. Gulfview Blvd. Mr. Howell - Attached is the Staff Report for the above referenced project. The Community Development Board will be held at 1:00 pm on Tuesday, February 21, 2006, in City Council chambers at City Hall (112 S. Osceola Avenue). Wayne Wells Gulfview S 678 Staff Report.do... y FEES NEI �� �, vF C� =y0 IF, 014f ;p February 9, 2006 The Community Development Board City of Clearwater P.O. Box 4748 Clearwater, FL 33758 Dear Sir: We own property in Continental Towers at 675 Gulfview Blvd. Unfortunately, we will be unable to attend the public hearing on Tuesday, February 21 S` I am writing in opposition to the construction of a new structure at 678 S. Gulfview Blvd. An 85 foot structure would obscure the view and decrease the property value for many residents in our condo. In addition, the construction of yet another property on our already crowded beach would further impede traffic flow and add to the growing problem of parking. Perhaps Playa Del Sol Resort could consider locating its proposed 3650 square foot of office and 27 attached dwellings to a less congested area of Clearwater. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, Nadyne S. Lee Let'4id' ke l A , ICY + z7 s+ I� t: 1 � �,J 147' February 9, 2006 City of Clearwater Planning Department Attn: Wayne M. Wells, AICP Planner III 100 S. Myrtle Ave. Clearwater, Fl 33756 Re: Proposed changes to the Clearwater Beach Resort (Playa Del Sol Resort) at 678 South Gulfview Blvd., Clearwater Beach Dear Mr. Wells: Clearwater Beach area is an area that is changing at a very fast pace. Many luxurious condo /townhouses/hotels are being built which increase market value for all owners of property on the beach. Our street ( Bayway Blvd.) is somewhat unique because it has recently changed from "mostly commercial property" to "mostly residential property" with some commercial. For example, the motel at 678 South Gulfview Blvd. (Clearwater Beach Resort) faces our townhouses at 656 Bayway Blvd. Our townhouse complex consists of 11 units and the majority of owners are full time residence. We shop at local stores, entertain friends and family, enjoy our fabulous beaches and send our children to local schools. We take pride in our homes and are very concerned about the appearance of our neighborhood. As neighbors of the existing Clearwater Beach Resort, we have several concerns about the new building (Playa Del Sol Resort) that is being proposed to replace this motel: 1. The height of the new structure: Mr. Patel is requesting that the building height be increased from 35 ft. to 85.08 ft. We feel that this height is detrimental to the appearance of our neighborhood and will create the "tunnel" affect'that is a major criticism of our neighboring street Brightwater. Currently, the new townhouse /condo developments on the 600 block are 3 to 5 stories in height. We are requesting that the building height be no higher than 50 ft. to conform to the new residential structures on the 600 block of Bayway Blvd. 2. The setback of the new structure: Mr. Patel is requesting that the setback of the structure be reduced on the north along Bayway Blvd from 15 ft. to 9.6 ft. Again, we feel that this will contribute to the "tunnel" affect that is a major criticism of our neighboring street Brightwater and will leave little room for landscaping, sidewalks and green space. We are requesting that the setback remain at 15 ft. along Bayway Blvd to allow for additional landscaping, larger sidewalks and more green space. This will help avoid the "tunnel" affect, soften the appearance of the building and be in keeping with the current residential neighborhood. ii+R`, f}w� � • -2- Re: Proposed changes to the Clearwater Beach Resort (Playa Del Sol Resort) at 678 South Gulfview Blvd., Clearwater Beach As you know, we currently have concerns with the lack of property maintenance on the existing Clearwater Beach Motel. The motel was damaged last year during the hurricane season (well over 6 months ago) and has never been repaired. The existing motel consists of three individual motel structures. Extensive fascia and exterior wallboards are missing from all three buildings. Of the three structures, it appears that the owner (Mr. Patel) is currently renting motel rooms in one or two of these buildings; the other building(s) appears to be vacant with mattress and furniture against the windows. We feel the condition of these buildings creates several problems for our neighborhood: Given that the rented building(s) has fascia and exterior boards missing, animals and insects can crawl into the buildings thereby creating a health issue. All 3 buildings are an eyesore, actually look abandoned, and are a very unattractive site for our neighborhood. The fact that the structure(s) looks abandoned/uninhabited, invites crime and additional littering and loitering. Since last year, we have requested that the City of Clearwater Code Enforcement Department require that Mr. Patel make the repairs to the existing building since he is still actively operating this motel. We understand the motel may be demolished and a new resort constructed at some point in the future, but this may take several months or even years. To date, Mr. Patel has not made any of the repairs to the exterior of the building and it is truly an eyesore. As I mentioned earlier, we are in a changing community and we need to work together to make this beautiful beach area even better and more desirable. Please feel free to contact me at (727) 812 -9831 if you have any questions or need additional information. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, Share Mancuso cc: Leslie F. Howell, President of 656 Bayway Townhome Homeowners Assoc., Inc. Michael Scott, Secretary of 656 Bayway Townhome Homeowners Assoc., Inc. Robert Mancuso, Treasurer of 656 Bayway Townhome Homeowners Assoc., Inc. Teri R.Averill, LCAM, Representing First Choice Assoc. Mgmt., Inc. Frank Hibbard, Mayor of City of Clearwater Shelby Brown, Code Enforcement Officer for City of Clearwater /Bob Hall, Manager of Development & Neighborhood Services for City of Clearwater Michael Delk, Planning Manager for City of Clearwater 0 0 February 9, 2006 City of Clearwater Development & Neighborhood Services Attn: Shelby Brown, Code Enforcement Officer for City of Clearwater P.O Box 4748 Clearwater, Fl 33758 FYI" Re: Clearwater Beach Resort at 678 South Gulfview Blvd., Clearwater Beach Dear Ms. Brown: Clearwater Beach area is an area that is changing at a very fast pace. Many luxurious condo /townhouses/hotels are being built which increase market value for all owners of property on the beach. Our street ( Bayway Blvd.) is somewhat unique because it has recently changed from "mostly commercial property" to "mostly residential property" with some commercial. For example, the motel at 678 South Gulfview Blvd. (Clearwater Beach Resort) faces our townhouses at 656 Bayway Blvd. Our townhouse complex consists of 11 units where the majority of owners are full time residence. We shop at local stores, entertain friends and family, enjoy our fabulous beaches and send our children to local schools. We take pride in our homes and are very concerned about the appearance of our neighborhood. As you know, the exterior of the Clearwater Beach Resort was damaged last year during the hurricane season (well over 6 months ago) and has never been repaired. The motel consists of three individual motel structures. Extensive fascia and exterior wallboards are missing from all three. Of the three structures, it appears that the owner (Mr. Patel) is currently renting motel rooms in one or two of these buildings; the other building(s) appears to be vacant with mattress and furniture against the windows. We feel the condition of these buildings creates several problems for our neighborhood: Given that the rented building(s) has fascia and exterior boards missing, animals and insects can crawl into the buildings thereby creating a health issue. All 3 buildings are an eyesore, actually look abandoned, and are a very unattractive site for our neighborhood. The fact that the structure(s) looks abandoned/uninhabited, invites crime and additional littering and loitering. You and I have spoken several times over the past few months (via telephone) regarding this matter. A few months ago, you told me that the resort would be fined if they did not do the repairs by a certain date. That date has past, the repairs have not been done and to my knowledge, the motel has not been fined. -2- Re: Clearwater Beach Resort at 678 South Gulfview Blvd., Clearwater Beach When I spoke to you last week, you told me that the code violation issue for the motel would not be on the 2/22/06 agenda because Mr. Patel was meeting on 2/21/06 with the Planning Dept. to discuss his new construction plans for the site. I spoke with Mr. Wells in the Planning Dept. about the current condition of the Clearwater Beach Resort and he agrees that Code Enforcement should force Mr. Patel to make the repairs to the existing building since he is still actively operating this motel. I understand the motel may be demolished and a new resort constructed at some point in the future, but this may take several months or even years. Therefore, I request that Code Enforcement force Mr. Patel to make the repairs immediately or be fined until the repairs are made. I'm actually unclear as to why this process is taking so long. As I mentioned earlier, we are in a changing community and we need to work together to make this beautiful beach even better and more desirable. Please feel free to contact me at (727) 812 -9831 if you have any questions or need additional information. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, Share Mancuso cc: Leslie F. Howell, President of 656 Bayway Townhome Homeowners Assoc., Inc. Michael Scott, Secretary of 656 Bayway Townhome Homeowners Assoc., Inc. Robert Mancuso, Treasurer of 656 Bayway Townhome Homeowners Assoc., Inc. Teri R.Averill, LCAM, Representing First Choice Assoc. Mgmt., Inc. Frank Hibbard, Mayor of City of Clearwater Bob Hall, Manager of Development & Neighborhood Services for City of Clearwater Wayne M. Wells, AICP Planner III for City of Clearwater Michael Delk, Planning Manager for City of Clearwater 0 0 February 9, 2006 Harish Patel SKTEL, Inc. 678 South Gulfview Blvd. Clearwater Beach, Fl 33767 Y-rl r EB 10 2006 PLANNING & DE INV c: i "d:r;dT SVCI ri OF Re: Clearwater Beach Resort at 678 South Gulfview Blvd., Clearwater Beach Dear Mr. Patel: Clearwater Beach area is an area that is changing at a very fast pace. Many luxurious condo /townhouses/hotels are being built which increase market value for all owners of property on the beach. Our street ( Bayway Blvd.) is somewhat unique because it has recently changed from "mostly commercial property" to "mostly residential property" with some commercial. For example, your building at 678 South Gulfview Blvd. (Clearwater Beach Resort) faces our townhouses at 656 Bayway Blvd. Our townhouse complex consists of I I units where the majority of owners are full time residence. We shop at local stores, entertain friends and family, enjoy our fabulous beaches and send our children to local schools. We take pride in our homes and are very concerned about the appearance of our neighborhood. Since you are the owner(s) of the Clearwater Beach Resort, we are writing to request some improvements to your site to better our neighborhood: 1. Exterior of your building needs to be repaired and painted: The exterior of your motel was damaged last year during the hurricane season (over 6 months ago) and has never been repaired. We have been in contact with Shelby Brown (Code Enforcement Officer for the City of Clearwater) since last year and she said you have been notified several time to make repairs but have chosen not to. Your motel consists of three individual motel structures. Extensive fascia and exterior wallboards are missing from all three buildings. Of the three structures, it appears that you are currently renting motel rooms in one or two of these buildings; the other building(s) appears to be vacant with mattress and furniture against the windows. We feel this creates several problems: Given that the rented building(s) has fascia and exterior boards missing, animals and insects can crawl into the buildings thereby creating a health issue. All 3 buildings are an eyesore, actually look abandoned, and a very unattractive site for our neighborhood. The fact that the structure(s) looks abandoned/uninhabited, invites crime and additional littering and loitering. -2- Re: Clearwater Beach Resort at 678 South Gulfview Blvd., Clearwater Beach 2. The garbage area in the rear of the building should be fenced or moved. 3. Additional landscaping would be appreciated and would enhance the appearance of your building. We understand the Clearwater Beach Resort may be demolished and a new resort constructed at some point in the future, but this may take several months or even years. Therefore, we respectfully request that repairs /enhancements be made to the existing structure /site immediately. These changes should include all of the above. As I mentioned earlier, we are neighbors in a changing community and need to work together to make this beautiful beach even better and more desirable. Please feel free to contact me at (727) 442 -7552 if you have any questions or need additional information. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, Leslie F. Howell, PrV-idoent of 656 Bayway Townhome Homeowners Association, Inc. cc: Michael Scott, Secretary of 656 Bayway Townhome Homeowners Assoc., Inc. Robert Mancuso, Treasurer of 656 Bayway Townhome Homeowners Assoc., Inc. Teri R.Averill, LCAM, Representing First Choice Assoc. Mgmt., Inc. Frank Hibbard, Mayor of City of Clearwater Shelby Brown, Code Enforcement Officer for City of Clearwater Bob Hall, Manager of Development & Neighborhood Services for City of Clearwater Wayne M. Wells, AICP Planner III for City of Clearwater 1/ Michael Delk, Planning Manager for City of Clearwater Northside CIVIL* LAND PLANNING • ENVIRONMENTAL • TRANSPORTATION • LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL Date: November 2, 2005 To: hP; a c` Mr. Wayne Wells City of Clearwater Planning Dept. 100 S. Myrtle Ave, #210 l -1 5 -.�. Clearwater, FL 33756 P..i i'}•i *I.. i,}f }�li i Reference: Playa Del Sol NES Proj# 554 We Transmit: Enclosed Mail ' Pick -Up Per Your Request X For Your Use For Your Files Under Separate Cover UPS Overnight X Hand Delivered For Your Review & Comment For Your Approval For Your Information X Originals Prints Addendum Shop drawings Specifications Applications Floppy Disk Copies Date Description 2 Sketch &Legal Description, Signed and Sealed 1 Surv Please contact us at (727) 443 -2869 should you have any questions or comments. By: Ang Haines, Exec. in. Assistant Copies To: FILE N. Pelzer D.Williams 601 CLEVELAND STREET, SUITE 930 CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33755 NESADMIN @MINDSPRING.COM N ESTECH ®MI NDSPRI NG.COM 727 • 443 • 2869 FAX 727 • 446 8036 ey, Signed and Sealed Please contact us at (727) 443 -2869 should you have any questions or comments. By: Ang Haines, Exec. in. Assistant Copies To: FILE N. Pelzer D.Williams 601 CLEVELAND STREET, SUITE 930 CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33755 NESADMIN @MINDSPRING.COM N ESTECH ®MI NDSPRI NG.COM 727 • 443 • 2869 FAX 727 • 446 8036 KE E7[N 8r Sp"CAUR SURN7]E -Y][l---TG, ][NC PROFESSIONAL SURVEYORS AND MAPPERS 8016 OLD COUNTY ROAD No. 54 NEW PORT RICHEY. FLORIDA 34653 OFFICE: 727- 834 -8140 FAX: 727 -834 -8150 SKETCH AND LEGAL DESCRIPTION: C� v LOT 9 BLOCK B 0 20 40 B; THENCE SOUT 200 37'52" WEST, ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID 10 8.80 FEET; THENCE NORTH 70° 29'56" EAST, A NORTH 8.80' N190 30'04 "E LOT 18 BLOCK B LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT 10 BLOCK B POINT OF BEGINNING NORTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 17, BLOCK B P.B. 38, PGS. 38 -39 BASIS OF BEARING LINE OF LOTS 7 & 18, BLOCK B S700 29'56 "E 85.44' N700 29'56 "W 85.26' . LOT 17 BLOCK. B m OY 0 w0 Z J J m Q 1— WO J LOT 11 BLOCK B X8.80' S200 37'52 "W LOT 16 BLOCK B A PARCEL OF LAND LYING IN SECTION 17, TOWNSHIP 29 SOUTH, RANGE 15 EAST, PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA. BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: A PORTION OF LOTS 17 AND 18, BLOCK B OF BAYSIDE SUBDIVISION No. 5, ACCORDING TO THE MAP OR PLAT THEREOF, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 38, PAGES 38 -39 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA. BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT 17, BLOCK B; THENCE SOUT 200 37'52" WEST, ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID LOT 17, A DISTANCE OF 8.80 FEET; THENCE NORTH 70° 29'56" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 85.26 FEET; THENCE NORTH 190 30'04" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 8.80 FEET TO THE NORTH LINE OF LOT 18 OF SAID BLOCK B; THENCE SOUTH 700 29156" EAST, ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID LOTS 17 AND 18, BLOCK B, A DISTANCE OF 85.44 FEET. TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. CONTAINING 752 SQUARE FEET, OR 0.0173 ACRES MORE OR LESS. NOTES: 1. BEARINGS BASED ON THE NORTH LINE OF LOTS 17 8.18, BLOCK B, ACCORDING TO THE MAP OR PLAT THEREOF, HAVING A BEARING OF NORTH 70 029'56" WEST. 2. THIS IS NOT A BOUNDARY SURVEY, BUT ONLY A SKETCH OF THE ABOVE LEGAL DESCRIPTION. LEGEND: P.B. = PLAT BOOK PGS. = PAGES BRUCE A. KLEIN PROFESSIONAL SUR FLORIDA LICENSED No. PARCEL TAKING I JOB. No. 030155SK.2 11/02/05 DATE: DATE: 11/02/05 SHEET: 1 OF 1 SHEE Srr kTJB SURV]E -Y][NG, ][NC PROFESSIONAL SURVEYORS AND MAPPERS 8016 OLD COUNTY ROAD No. 54 NEW PORT RICHEY, FLORIDA 34653 OFFICE: 727- 834 -8140 FAX: 727- 834 -8150 SKETCH AND LEGAL DESCRIPTION: 0 LOT 8 o" LOT 9 BLOCK B Z o BLOCK B � J m F- c V) wI,- 3:0 J 7.50' N180 22'31 "E S700 29156 11E LOT 19 BLOCK B LEGAL DESCRIPTION: n 7- LOT 10 No BLOCK B 0 20 40 10 N700 29'56 "W 99.55' SOUTH LINE OF LOTS 9 & 10, BLOCK B BASIS OF BEARINGS ' POINT OF BEGINNING SOUTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 9, BLOCK B P.B. 38, PGS. 38 -39 LOT 18 BLOCK B LOT 17 BLOCK B 7.50' S190 30'04 "W A PARCEL OF LAND LYING IN SECTION 17, TOWNSHIP 29 SOUTH, RANGE 15 EAST, PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA. BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: A PORTION OF LOTS 9 AND 10, BLOCK B OF BAYSIDE SUBDIVISION No. 5, ACCORDING TO THE MAP OR PLAT THEREOF, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 38, PAGES 38 -39 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA. BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT 9, BLOCK B; THENCE NORTH 18" 22'31" EAST, ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID LOT 9, A DISTANCE OF 7.50 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 700 29'56" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 99.70 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 190 30'04" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 7.50 FEET TO THE SOUTH LINE OF LOT 10 OF SAID BLOCK B; THENCE NORTH 700 29'56" WEST, ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID LOTS 9 AND 10, BLOCK B, A DISTANCE OF 99.55 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. CONTAINING 746 SQUARE FEET, OR 0.0171 ACRES MORE OR LESS. NOTES: 1. BEARINGS BASED ON THE SOUTH LINE OF LOTS 9 8 10, BLOCK B. ACCORDING TO THE MAP OR PLAT THEREOF, HAVING A BEARING OF NORTH 70 °2956" WEST. 2. THIS IS NOT A BOUNDARY SURVEY, BUT ONLY A SKETCH OF THE ABOVE LEGAL DESCRIPTION. LEGEND: P.B. = PLAT BOOK --d - -� PGS. = PAGES_. `I 11/02/05 BRUCE A. KLI; fly; } ` DATE PROFESSIONAL S R4YE ' rA,41D� UPPER FLORIDA LICENSED Ka: LS -'5052 PARCEL TAKING I JOB No. 030155SK.1 I DATE: 11/02/05 1 SHEET: 1 OF 1 SHEETS 7E NI E][N & -C2kT.TB STJRV]E-Y-7[ ][Nc PRO M SIONAL SURVEYORS AND MAPPER 8016 OLD COUNTY ROAD No. 54 NEW PORT RICHEY, FLORIDA 34653 OFFICE: 727- 834 -8140 FAX: 727 - 834 -8150 SKETCH AND LEGAL DESCRIPTION: EXHIBIT "A" BAYWAY BOULEVARD NORTH'- _ 60' RIGHT -OF -WAY (P.B. 38, PGS. 38 -39) 36' ASPHALT PAVEMENT R- 4820.00' A- 25.00' 5' DRAINAGE, UTILITY & CHID.- 25.00' SIDEWALK EASEMENT /—CB -S71° 28'34 "E FO.R.B. 6958, PGS.423 -424 SOUTHERLY t RIGHT -OF -WAY LINE C;4 0 6 NORTHWEST CORNER LEGEND: OF LOT 9,BLOCK B P.B. 38, PGS. 38 -39 A = ARC DISTANCE CB = CHORD BEARING CHID. T CHORD DISTANCE P.B. = PLAT BOOK PGS. = PAGES R = RADIUS NOTES: A JAN 2 .715 2006 DF %1 E QPiAENT S'JC; 1. BEARINGS BASED ON THE SOUTH LINE OF LOTS 9 8,10, BLOCK B, ACCORDING TO THE MAP OR PLAT THEREOF, HAVING A BEARING OF NORTH 70 029'56" WEST. 2. THIS IS NOT A BOUNDARY SURVEY, BUT ONLY A SKETCH OF THE LEGAL DESCRIPTION AS SHOWN ON SHEET 1 OF 2. I IGRESS- EGRESS PARKING VACATION I JOB No. 030155SK.9 I DATE: 12/01/05 1 SHEET: 2 OF 2 SHEETS v7 C� - �N co 0 20 40 z co -' 10 z� N � W � fJt QO LOT 9 LOT 10 cA m BLOCK B BLOCK B J � /\--�� Im^^ cn V / --I V i ' . m V'' > Z ^^ V + z ✓ 10111 0 S70° 29'56 "E 90.02' cn N 0 z 0) z o0 0 N O ]m/ V � 1', TT N700 29'56 "W 115.02' SOUTH LINE OF LOTS 9 & 10, BLOCK B LOT 19 LOT 18 LOT 17 BLOCK B BLOCK B BLOCK B POINT OF COMMENCEMENT NORTHWEST CORNER LEGEND: OF LOT 9,BLOCK B P.B. 38, PGS. 38 -39 A = ARC DISTANCE CB = CHORD BEARING CHID. T CHORD DISTANCE P.B. = PLAT BOOK PGS. = PAGES R = RADIUS NOTES: A JAN 2 .715 2006 DF %1 E QPiAENT S'JC; 1. BEARINGS BASED ON THE SOUTH LINE OF LOTS 9 8,10, BLOCK B, ACCORDING TO THE MAP OR PLAT THEREOF, HAVING A BEARING OF NORTH 70 029'56" WEST. 2. THIS IS NOT A BOUNDARY SURVEY, BUT ONLY A SKETCH OF THE LEGAL DESCRIPTION AS SHOWN ON SHEET 1 OF 2. I IGRESS- EGRESS PARKING VACATION I JOB No. 030155SK.9 I DATE: 12/01/05 1 SHEET: 2 OF 2 SHEETS PROF 4frr.2k-LTB IONAL SURVEYORS AND MAPPERS 8016 OLD COUNTY ROAO Nc.. 54 NEW PORT RICHEY, FLORIDA 34653 OFFICE: 727- 834 -8140 FAX: 727-834-8150 LEGEND' SKETCH AND LEGAL DESCRIPTION: • _ EXHIBIT "A" O.R.B. = OFFIC AL RECORDS BOOK 3.54' S70 P.B. = PLAT BOOK 27'38"E PGS. =PAGES EAST LINE OF P-0 B. = POINT OF BEGINNING LOT 16, BLOCK B P.O.C.. = POINT OF COMMENCEMENT 0 N n d' W N n LOT 16 �o BLOCK B M No LOT 15 0 BLOCK B rn v z V; N 0 20 40 0.55' z N700 26'44 "W a w 10 � c° C2 0 N rn w rn P.O.B. P.O.C.. 00 J SOUTHEAST CORNER 0.28' OF LOT 16, BLOCK B N7' ° 46'57 "W P.B. 38, PGS. 38 -39 14.90' N200 37'52 "E 60' RIGHT -OF -WAY (P.B. 38, PGS. 38 -39) SOUTH GULFVIEW BOULEVARD LEGAL DESCRIPTION: (WALKWAY EASEMENT VACATION). A PARCEL OF LAND LYING IN SECTION 17, TOWNSHIP 29 SOUTH, RANGE 15 EAST, PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA AND BEING DESCRIBED IN THE OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 10971, PAGES 408 -410 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA. BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: A PORTION OF LOT 16, BLOCK B OF BAYSIDE SUBDIVISION No. 5, ACCORDING TO THE MAP OR PLAT THEREOF, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 38, PAGES 38 -39 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA. BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCE AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT 16, BLOCK B; THENCE NORTH 20° 37'52" EAST, ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID LOT 16, A DISTANCE OF 14.90 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING: THENCE NORTH 720 46'57" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 0.28 FEET; THENCE NORTH 170 37'02" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 36.81 FEET; THENCE NORTH 70° 26'44" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 0.55 FEET; THENCE NORTH 190 33'16" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 41.20 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 70° 27'38" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 3.54 FEET TO A POINT ON THE EAST LINE OF SAID LOT 16: THENCE SOUTH 200 37'52" EAST, ALONG SAID EAST LINE, A DISTANCE OF 77.96 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. CONTAINING 176 SQUARE FEET, OR 0.0040 ACRES MORE OR LESS. NOTES: 1. BEARINGS BASED ON THE EAST LINE OF LOT 16, BLOCK B, ACCORDING TO THE MAP OR PLAT THEREOF, HAVING A BEARING OF NORTH 20 037'52" EAST. 2. THIS IS NOT A BOUNDARY SURVEY, BUT ONLY A SKETCH OF THE ABOVE LEGAL DESCRIPTION. BRUCE A. KLElN PROFESSIONAL SURVEY AND MAPPER FLORIDA LICENSED No. LS 5052 12/05/05 DATE: JAN 2 5 Zoos PLAN fVilif`i GEL'EI.QF iEP�t$ IWALKWAY EASEMENT VACATION I JOB No. 030155SK.12 I DATE: 12/05/05 SHEET: 1 OF 1 SHEETS KII.IEIIl*-T ANSITA.UB SlTaVIEYII ]INC PROMIONAL SURVEYORS AND MAPPER 8016 OLD COUNTY ROAD No. 54 NEW PORT RICHEY, FLORIDA 34653 OFFICE: 727- 834 -8140 FAX: 727- 834 -8150 SKETCH AND LEGAL DESCRIPTION: I— w S70° 29'56 "E 1 75.00' N70° 29'56 "W 175.001 UTH LINE OF LOTS 9 & 10, BLOCK BASIS OF BEARINGS LOT 18 BLOCK B [:1 u7 n r O 0 Cn O Y 10 00 m LOT 10 o; LOT 9 0 o BLOCK B F7 BLOCK B w w o z_z_ 0 w Q EAST 40.00' w w WEST 35.00' J I— w S70° 29'56 "E 1 75.00' N70° 29'56 "W 175.001 UTH LINE OF LOTS 9 & 10, BLOCK BASIS OF BEARINGS LOT 18 BLOCK B [:1 u7 n r O 0 20 40 10 5.00' 1 SIDEWALK EASEMENT O.R.B. 7173, PGS. 1896 -1899 TO BE VACATED LOT 17 BLOCK B LEGAL DESCRIPTION: (5.00' SIDEWALK EASEMENT TO BE VACATED) A PARCEL OF LAND LYING IN SECTION 17, TOWNSHIP 29 SOUTH, RANGE 15 EAST, PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA. BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: A 5.00 FOOT SIDEWALK EASEMENT, ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF LOTS 9 AND 10, BLOCK B, OF • BAYSIDE SUBDIVISION No. 5, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 38, PAGES 38 -39 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA, SAID SIDEWALK EASEMENT DESCRIBED IN THE OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 7173, PAGES 1896 -1899 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA. BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: THE SOUTH 5.00 FEET OF THE WEST 35.00 FEET OF LOT 10 AND THE SOUTH 5.00 FEET OF THE EAST 40.00 FEET OF LOT 9, BLOCK B, BAYSIDE SUBDIVISION No. 5, ACCORDING TO THE MAP OR PLAT THEREOF, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 38, PAGES 38 -39 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA. CONTAINING 375 SQUARE FEET OR 0.0086 ACRES MORE OR LESS. NOTES: 1. BEARINGS BASED ON THE SOUTH LINE OF LOTS 9 810, BLOCK B, ACCORDING TO THE MAP OR PLAT THEREOF, HAVING A BEARING OF NORTH 70 029'56" WEST. 2. THIS IS NOT A BOUNDARY SURVEY, BUT ONLY A SKETCH OF THE ABOVE LEGAL DESCRIPTION. LEGEND: O.R.B. = OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK P.B. = PLAT BOOK PGS. = PAGES P.O.B. = POINT OF BEGINNING P.O.C. = POINT OF COMMENCEMENT JAI 2 5 2006 ! 1 p 11/02/05 PLAt4NI(4� -i U. /ycE �±��J EC: �. �tn`�.;t ;,i �S il�.a F. 4. �-- _ w BRUCE A. KLEIN DATE: -' PROFESSIONAL SURVEY AND MAPPER FLORIDA LICENSED No. LS 5052 SIDEWALK EASEMENT VACATION JOB No. 030155SK.4 DATE: 11/02/05 SHEET: 1 OF 1 SHEETS . . Kil 8016 OLD COUNTY ROAIIi Nd. 54 LOT 10 BLOCK B NORTH 11.50' S19° 30'04W LOT 17 n BLOCK B r� a 7CAT.TB SualvF1'yl , 1[NC PROF IONAL SURVEYORS AND MAPPERS NEW PORT RICHEY, FLORIDA 34653 OFFICE: 727- 834 -8140 SKETCH AND LEGAL DESCRIPTION: EXHIBIT "A" LOT 11 BLOCK B LINE OF LOTS 16 & 17, BLOCK B N700 29'56 "W 68.13' WALKWAY & DRAINAGE EASEMENT i O.R.B. 10971, PAGES 398; 400 S700 29'56 "E 38.00' 10.001--/ {. _/ / ­e_ S190 30'04 "W 21.79' S890 09'38 "E LOT 16 12.35' _.._'1111*1 BLOCK B S090 31'36 "E 5.54'--/ S700 27'38 "E 0 20 40 10 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: (WALKWAY & POND EASEMENT VACATION) z N O 0 w v N m L4 cn FAX: 727 -834 -8150 LOT 12 BLOCK B POINT OF BEGINNING NUKIHLA51 UUKNLK OF LOT 16, BLOCK B P.B. 38, PGS. 38 -39 LOT 15 BLOCK B -EAST LINE OF LOT 16, BLOCK B A PARCEL OF LAND LYING IN SECTION 17, TOWNSHIP 29 SOUTH, RANGE 15 EAST, PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA AND BEING DESCRIBED IN THE OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 10971, PAGES 398 -400 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA. BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: A PORTION OF LOTS 16 AND 17, BLOCK B OF BAYSIDE SUBDIVISION No. 5, ACCORDING TO THE MAP OR PLAT THEREOF, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 38, PAGES 38 -39 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA. BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT 16, BLOCK B; THENCE NORTH 70° 29'59" WEST, ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID LOTS 16 & 17, A DISTANCE OF 68.13 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 190 30'04" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 11.50 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 700 29'59" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 38.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 190 30'04" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 10.00 FEET: THENCE SOUTH 690 09'38" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 21.79 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 09° 31'36" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 12.35 WEST; THENCE SOUTH 700 27'38" EAST, 5.54 FEET TO A POINT ON THE EAST LINE OF SAID LOT 16, BLOCK B; THENCE NORTH 200 37'52" EAST, ALONG SAID EAST LINE, A DISTANCE OF 34.19 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. CONTAINING 1,171 SQUARE FEET, OR 0.0269 ACRES MORE OR LESS. NOTES: 1. BEARINGS BASED ON THE SOUTH LINE OF LOTS 9 810, BLOCK B. ACCORDING TO THE MAP OR PLAT THEREOF, HAVING A BEARING OF NORTH 70 02956" WEST. 2. THIS IS NOT A BOUNDARY SURVEY, BUT ONLY A SKETCH OF THE ABOVE LEGAL DESCRIPTION. LEGEND: O.R.B. = OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK P.B. = PLAT BOOK PGS. = PAGES 'P.O.B. = POINT OF' BIEGINNING P.O.C. = POINT OF COMMENCEMENT BRUCE A. KLEIN PROFESSIONAL SURVEY AND MAPPER FLORIDA LICENSED No. LS 5052 Q I uuv J IFJ 2 5 2006 ; . 12/05/05 1 PLANNING 8 O�VcCO "t�i�'t: I SVCS� DATE :,--- .._C4TYQ.F IWALKWAY & POND EASEMENT VACATION] JOB No. 030155SK.11 I DATE- 12/05/05 SHEET: 1 OF 1 SHEETS � N N Q0 O O N Ln N Ln / O -- (/ I , - Co O - -- �J 10' SETBACK LINE P.B. 38, PGS. 38 -39 / � s II � O P z V) N dN NI mr -- O vivm =1 yZZ fy/l WALGR£ENS i STRY C. o (1) -- 6, CDMDMEXClAL B.S. N C') Z O c,PACpFR1Y '�. 0 0 m 0 O o L .SAN 2 5 2006 i u PLANNING & UE V ELOe-ME d T SVCS CITY QA ....,:. . Q Ln O O N a 5' DRAINAGE, UTILITY & SIDEWALK EASEMENT D.R.B. 6958, PGS.423 -424I 1D' SE734CK LINE —P.a 38, PGS 36-39 AND 10' DRAIMGE, URUTY & SIDEWALK EASEMENT O.R.B. 6956, PGS423 -424 60' RIGHT -DF -WAY (P.B. 38, PGS. 38 -39) 36' ASPHALT PAVEMENT 2' CDNC. CURB & GU7T SOUTH GMNIEW 1 ]�1L �]IN PR SSIONAL SURVEYORS AND MAPPE 8016 OLD COUNTY RIiAD Wo. 54 NEW PORT RICHEY, FLORIDA 34653 OFFICE: 727- 834 -8140 FAX: 727- 834 -8150 SKETCH AND LEGAL DESCRIPTION: EXHIBIT "A" 0 LOT 8 0,.e LOT 9 BLOCK B Z0 BLOCK B J J m F— c UJ 3:0 J POINT OF BEGINNING 5.00' N18° 22'31 "E S700 19'36"E 3.50' N18° 22'31 "E LOT 19 BLOCK B N700 29'56 "W 99.72' 99.62' n LOT 10 No BLOCK B 0 20 40 10 �- SOUTH LINE OF LOTS 9'& 10, BLOCK B BASIS OF BEARINGS 'POINT OF COMMENCE SOUTHWEST CORNER LOT 17 OF LOT 9, BLOCK B BLOCK B P.B. 38, PGS. 38 -39 LOT 18 BLOCK B LEGAL DESCRIPTION: (PROPOSED SIDEWALK EASEMENT) 5.00' S190 30'04 "W A PARCEL OF LAND LYING IN SECTION 17, TOWNSHIP 29 SOUTH, RANGE 15 EAST, PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA. BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: A PORTION OF LOTS 9 AND 10, BLOCK B OF BAYSIDE SUBDIVISION No. 5, ACCORDING TO THE MAP OR PLAT THEREOF, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 38, PAGES 38 -39 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA. BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCE AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT 9, BLOCK B; THENCE NORTH 180 22'31" EAST, ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID LOT 9, A DISTANCE OF 3.50 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUE ALONG SAID WEST LINE, NORTH 180 22'31" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 5.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 70019'36" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 99.72 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 19° 30'04" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 5.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 70019'36" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 99.62 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. CONTAINING 498 SQUARE FEET, OR 0.0114 ACRES MORE OR LESS. NOTES: 1. BEARINGS BASED ON THE SOUTH LINE OF LOTS 9 810, BLOCK B, ACCORDING TO THE MAP OR PLAT THEREOF, HAVING A BEARING OF NORTH 70 029'56" WEST. 2. THIS IS NOT A BOUNDARY SURVEY, BUT ONLY A SKETCH OF THE ABOVE LEGAL DESCRIPTION. LEGEND: P.B. = PLAT BOOK PGS. _ PAGES BRUCE A. KLEIN PROFESSIONAL St;RVEY ANU MAPFER FLORIDA LICENSED No. La 5052 12/01/05 DATE: JAN 2 2006 P .,, .:., s DEVELOPME PROPOSED SIDEWALK EASEMENT I JOB No. 030155SK.6 I DATE: 12/01/05 1 SHEET: 1 OF 1 SHEETS K 8016 OLD COUNTY ROAD LOT 8 BLOCK B 0 L C Y W U z_o J J m H � U) w� �o J S°IC� �JB STJRV]� 'y��s, ][Nc PR SSIONAL SURVEYORS AND MAPPE NEW PORT RICHEY, FLORIDA 34653 OFFICE: 727- 834 -8140 FAX: 727 - 834 -8150 SKETCH AND LEGAL DESCRIPTION: EXHIBIT "A" LOT "9 BLOCK B _ 3.50' N180 22'31 "E S700 19'36 "E 112.12' v7 n r� LOT 10 No BLOCK B 0 20 40 10 3.16' S190 30'04 "W, N700 29'56 "W 112.05' SOUTH LINE OF LOTS 9 & 10, BLOCK B BASIS OF BEARINGS POINT OF BEGINNING SOUTHWEST CORNER LOT 17 OF LOT 9, BLOCK B BLOCK B P.B. 38, PGS. 38 -39 LOT 19 LOT 18 BLOCK B BLOCK B LEGAL DESCRIPTION: A PARCEL OF LAND LYING IN SECTION 17, TOWNSHIP 29 SOUTH, RANGE 15 EAST, PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA. BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: A PORTION OF LOTS 9 AND 10, BLOCK B OF BAYSIDE SUBDIVISION No. 5, ACCORDING TO THE MAP OR PLAT THEREOF, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 38, PAGES 38 -39 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA. BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT 9, BLOCK B; THENCE NORTH 18° 22'31" EAST, ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID LOT 9, A DISTANCE OF 3.50 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 70019'36" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 112.12 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 19° 30'04" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 3.16 FEET TO THE SOUTH LINE OF LOT 10 OF SAID BLOCK B; THENCE NORTH 700 29156" WEST, ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID LOTS 9 AND 10, BLOCK B, A DISTANCE OF 112.05 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. CONTAINING 373 SQUARE FEET, OR 0.0086 ACRES MORE OR LESS. NOTES: 1. BEARINGS BASED ON THE SOUTH LINE OF LOTS 9 & 10, BLOCK B, ACCORDING TO THE MAP OR PLAT THEREOF, HAVING A BEARING OF NORTH 70 02956" WEST. 2. THIS IS NOT A BOUNDARY SURVEY, BUT ONLY A SKETCH OF THE ABOVE LEGAL DESCRIPTION. LEGEND: P.B. = PLAT BOOK PGS. = PAGES BRUCE A. KL'c'IN PROFESSIONAL SURVEY AND MAPPER FLORIDA LICENSEID No. LS 5052 p ��uky JAN 2 5 2006 PLANNING g DEVLL0-'N4-r: r s`!C; 12/01/05 DATE: I PARCEL TAKING (SOUTH PROPERTY) IJOB No. 030155SK.51 DATE: 12/01/05 1 SHEET: 1 OF 1 SHEETS 8016 OLD COUNTY ROAD No. 54 0 � r OY W U ZO J J CQ I-c LOT 8 � ~o BLOCK B J S7C°.A.UB STJRVIE "Y�G, 7[NC PR SIGNAL SURVEYORS AND MAPPE NEW PORT RICHEY, FLORIDA 34653 OFFICE: 727 - 834 -8140 FAX: 727 - 834 -8150 SKETCH AND LEGAL DESCRIPTION: . EXHIBIT "A" 1 10.00' -- N19" 44'33 "E LOT 9 BLOCK B S70° 15'27 "E 10.00' 15'27 "E 7.80' 4S700 25.17' N180 22'31 'E POINT OFJ BEGINNING LOT 19 BLOCK B —10.00 1 190 44'33 "W �'__ 10.00' N70° 15'27 "W U1 C' LOT 10 NO BLOCK B 0 20 40 10 UTH LINE OF LOTS 9 '& 10, BLOCK B BASIS OF BEARINGS POINT OF COMMENCE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 9, BLOCK B P.B. 38, PGS. 38 -39 LOT 18 BLOCK B LEGAL DESCRIPTION: (PROPOSED SOUTH DUMPSTER PAD) LOT 17 BLOCK B A .PARCEL OF LAND LYING IN SECTION 17, TOWNSHIP 29 SOUTH, RANGE 15 EAST, PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA. BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: A PORTION OF LOTS 9, BLOCK B OF BAYSIDE SUBDIVISION No. 5, ACCORDING TO THE MAP OR PLAT THEREOF, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 38, PAGES 38 -39 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA. BEING MORE. PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCE AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT 9, BLOCK B; THENCE NORTH 180 22'31" EAST, ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID LOT 9, A DISTANCE OF 7.80 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 70019'36" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 25.17 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 19° 44'33" EAST, A DISTANCE OF ,10.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 700 15'27" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 10.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 190 44'33" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 10.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 70-15'27" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 10.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. CONTAINING 100 SQUARE FEET, OR 0.0023 ACRES MORE OR LESS. NOTES: 1. BEARINGS BASED ON THE SOUTH LINE OF LOTS 9 $ 10, BLOCK B. ACCORDING TO THE MAP OR PLAT THEREOF, HAVING A BEARING OF NORTH 70 029'56" WEST. 2. THIS IS NOT A BOUNDARY SURVEY, BUT ONLY A SKETCH OF THE ABOVE LEGAL DESCRIPTION. LEGEND: P.B. = PLAT BOOK PGS. = PAGES BRUCE A. KLEIN �- PROFE SSIONAL SURVEY AND MAPPER FLORIDA LICENSED No. LS 5052 12/01/05 DATE. JAN25 PLAN ;,iNG & DE�� LOE,m,::r4 r _.._Wy CA;, .�,: ;,1.is R PROPOSED DUMPSTER (SOUTH) I JOB No. 030155SK.7 I DATE: 12/01/05 1 SHEET: 1 OF 1 SHEETS f I 7�7C.]E7IIeT Sr-A.Ul SURV]E'Y' G, ][NC 8016 OLD COUNTY ROAD No. 54 0 n - PRU SSIONAL SURVEYORS AND MAPPER NEW PORT RICHEY. FLORIDA 34653 OFFICE: 727- 834 -8140 FAX: 727 - 834 -8150 SKETCH AND LEGAL DESCRIPTION: EXHIBIT "A" 0 20 40 = CHORD BEARING CHD. = CHORD DISTANCE 10 = PLAT BOOK PGS. = PAGES BAYWAY BOULEVARD NORTH 60' RIGHT -OF -WAY (P.B. 38, PGS. 38 -39) 36' ASPHALT PAVEMENT 5' DRAINAGE, UTILITY & SIDEWALK EASEMENT O.R.B. 6958, PGS.423 -42 � R- 4820.00' A- 10.00' R= 4820.00' A= 25.00' POINT OF CHD.- 10.00' CHD. =25.00' BEGINNING CB -S71° 16'13 "E CB =S71° 28'34 "E SOUTHERLY RIGHT -OF -WAY LINE POINT OF COMMENCEMENT NORTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 9, BLOCK B P.B. 38, PGS. 38 -39 10.001—/ t.._.�.J ` N18° 40'21 "W 10.00' N71° 16'13 "W LOT 9 BLOCK B LEGAL DESCRIPTION: (PROPOSED NORTH DUMPSTER PAD) -- 10.00' S180 40'21 "E ra' a LOT 10 BLOCK B A PARCEL OF LAND LYING IN SECTION 17, TOWNSHIP 29 SOUTH, RANGE 15 EAST, PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA. BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: A PORTION OF LOTS 9, BLOCK B OF BAYSIDE SUBDIVISION No. 5, ACCORDING TO THE MAP OR PLAT THEREOF, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 38, PAGES 38 -39 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA. BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCE AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT 9, BLOCK B, SAID POINT BEING ON THE ARC OF A CIRCULAR CURVE CONCAVE TO THE SOUTHWEST, HAVING A RADIUS OF 4820.00 FEET AND ALSO BEING THE SOUTHERLY RIGHT -OF -WAY LINE OF BAYWAY BOULEVARD NORTH; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE TO THE RIGHT, AN ARC DISTANCE OF 25.00 FEET AND A CHORD BEARING AND DISTANCE OF SOUTH 710 28'34" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 25.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUE ALONG SAID CURVE, HAVING A RADIUS OF 4820.00 FEET AN ARC DISTANCE OF 10.00 FEET, AND A CHORD BEARING AND DISTANCE OF SOUTH 71016'13" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 10.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 180 40'21" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 10.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 71016'13" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 10.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 18° 40'21" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 10.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. CONTAINING 100 SQUARE FEET, OR 0.0023 ACRES MORE OR LESS. NOTES: 1. BEARINGS BASED ON THE SOUTH LINE OF LOTS 9 810, BLOCK B, ACCORDING TO THE MAP OR PLAT THEREOF, HAVING A BEARING OF NORTH.70 029'56" WEST. 2. THIS IS NOT A BOUNDARY SURVEY, BUT ONLY A SKETCH OF THE ABOVE LEGAL DESCRIPTION. LEGEND: A = ARC DISTANCE CB = CHORD BEARING CHD. = CHORD DISTANCE P.B. = PLAT BOOK PGS. = PAGES R = F!A'I' I US BRUCE A. KLEIN PROFESSIONAL SURVE`l AND MAPPER FLORIDA LICENSED No. 1.8 5052 FrAN 2 5 2006 �, I 12/01/05 PI- ANNItdOg���Ofy'yLC;,'; �7771s' 1CS DATE. PROPOSED DUMPSTER (NORTH) JOB No. 030155SK.8 I DATE- 12/01/05 1 SHEET: 1 OF 1 SHEETS CITY OF CLEARWATER _ POST OFFICE BOX 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758 -4748 MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562 -4865 PLANNING DEPARTMENT May 16, 2007 Ms. Doreen Williams Northside Engineering Services, Inc. 601 Cleveland Street, Suite 930 Clearwater, FL 33755 RE: FLD2005 -07071 — 678 South Gulfview Boulevard Time Extension Development Order Dear Ms. Williams: On May 15, 2007, the Community Development Board (CDB) APPROVED your request to extend the time frame for the Development Order for the above referenced case. Pursuant to Section 4 -407, an application for a building permit to construct the site improvements on your parcel at 678 South Gulfview Boulevard shall be submitted by August 21, 2008. All required certificates of occupancy shall be obtained within two years of the date of issuance of the building permit. Time frames do not change with successive owners. Should you be unable to apply for a building permit to construct the improvements approved under the above referenced case, you will need to re -apply for development approval in accordance with the requirements of the Community Development Code. Please be aware that the issuance of this Development Order does not relieve you of the necessity to obtain any building permits or pay any impact fees that may be required. In order to facilitate the issuance of any permit or license affected by this approval, please bring a copy of this letter with you when applying for any permits or licenses that require this prior development approval. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Planner III at 727 -562 -4504. Sincerely, Michael Delk, AICP Planning Director S: (Planning DepartmentlC D BIFLEX (FLD)IInactive or Finished ApplicationslGulfview S 0678 Playa Del Sol (T) #1 Mixed Use - ApprovedlGulfview S 678 CDB Time Extension Development Order 5.16.07.doc FRANK HIBBARD, MAYOR JOHN DORAN, COUNCILMEMBER J.B. JOHNSON, COUNCILMEMBER BILL JONSON, COUNCILMEMBER CAREEN A. PETERSEN, COUNCILMEMBER "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER" CITY OF CLEARWATER I a q- C PLANNING DEPARTMENT POST OFFICE BOX 4748, CLEARWATER, Fi.oR,DA 33758 -4748 MUNICIPAL SERVICI?S BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVF,NUF, CLFARWATFR, FLORIDA 33756 TFLFPHONE (727) 562 -4567 FAx (727) 562 -4865 LONG RANGE PIANNING DFMOPMENT RFVIFW February 22, 2006 MEMO Mr. Housh Ghovaee � � Northside Engineering Services Inc. 601 Cleveland Street, Suite # 930 Clearwater, Florida 33755 RE: Development Order - Case No. FLD2005 -07071 — 678 South Gulfview Boulevard , f�• �� Dear Mr. Ghovaee: This letter constitutes a Development Order pursuant to Section 4- 206.D.6 of the Community Development Code. On February 21, 2006, the Community Development Board reviewed your requests for Flexible Development approval to permit a mixed use (3,650 square feet of office floor area, 27 attached dwellings and four overnight accommodation rooms /units) with reductions to the front (north along Bayway Blvd) setback from 15 feet to 9.6 feet (to building), from 15 feet to five feet (to existing pavement) and from 15 feet to zero feet (to trash staging area), reductions to the front (east along Parkway Drive) setback from 15 feet to 10.3 feet (to building) and from 15 feet to zero feet (to trash staging area), reductions to the side (west) setback from 10 feet to five feet (to pool and patio decks) and from 10 feet to zero feet (to existing pavement and sidewalk), reductions to the side (south) setback from 10 feet to 7.4 feet (to building), from 10 feet to zero feet (to trash staging area), and from 10 feet to zero feet (to existing sidewalk and pavement), a reduction to the side (east) setback from 10 feet to five feet (to pool deck) and an .increase to building height from 35 feet 'to 85.08 feet (to roof deck) with an additional 5.67 feet for perimeter parapets (from roof deck), as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2- 803.C. The Community Development Board (CDB) APPROVED the application with the following bases and conditions: Bases for Approval: 1. The proposal complies with the Flexible Development criteria as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project per Section 2- 803.C. 2. The proposal is in compliance with other standards in the Code including the General Applicability Criteria per Section 3 -913. 3. The development is compatible with the surrounding area and will enhance other redevelopment efforts. Conditions of Approval: 1. That the final design and color of the buildings be consistent with the conceptual elevations submitted to, or as modified by, the CDB; 2. That a Unity of Title be recorded in the public records prior to the issuance of any permits; 3. That, prior to the issuance of any permits, a Minor Lot Adjustment be submitted to the Planning Department, approved and recorded in the public records; FRANK HIBBARD, MAYOR I3111JONSON, VICE -MAYOR JOIIN DORAN, CO(iNCIIAWNIBIT .. 'SI:N, COlNCILMENBIT HOYI HAMILTON, CU(NCILMiMBIR CAR.:N A. Pr•r: "ISQIIAI. EMPLOYMENT ANI) AI�I -'IRMATM; A( °PION EMPLOYE., February 22, 2006 Ghovaee — Page 2 4. That the condominium concierge office area be solely accessory to the attached dwellings on this property. This office area on the first floor shall not be converted to general tenant office space; 5. That, prior to the issuance of any permits, the civil plans be revised to curb the edges of pavement and provide wheel stops for the existing surface parking area on the west side; 6. That, prior to the issuance of any permits, the landscape plan be revised to show the west side of the site improved to the same standard as the new areas of the site, acceptable to the Planning Department; 7. That a condominium plat be recorded prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy; 8. That any future freestanding signs be monument -style designed to match the exterior materials and color of the buildings. The maximum height shall be four feet, unless approved at a height of six feet high through a Comprehensive Sign Program. Existing signage shall be brought into compliance with Code provisions; 9. That all proposed utilities (from the right -of -way to the proposed building) be placed underground. Conduits for the future undergrounding of existing utilities within the abutting right -of -way shall be installed along the entire site's street frontages prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. The applicant's representative shall coordinate the size and number of conduits with all affected utility providers (electric, phone, cable, etc.), with the exact location, size and number of conduits to be approved by the applicant's engineer and the City's Engineering Department prior to the commencement of work; 10. That all utility equipment including but not limited to wireless communication facilities, electrical and gas meters, etc. be screened from view and/or painted to match the building to which they are attached, as applicable, prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy; 11. That all Fire Department requirements be met prior to the issuance of any permits; 12. That all Parks and Recreation fees be paid prior to the issuance of any permits; and 13. That, prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy, traffic impact fees be assessed and paid. Pursuant to Section 4-407, an application for a building permit shall be made within one year of Flexible Development approval (February 21, 2007). All required certificates of occupancy shall be obtained within two years of the date of issuance of the building permit. Time frames do not change with successive owners. The Community Development Coordinator may grant an extension of time for a period not to exceed one year and only within the original period of validity. The Community Development Board may approve one additional extension of time after the community development coordinator's extension to initiate a building permit application. The issuance of this Development Order does not relieve you of the necessity to obtain any building permits or pay any impact fees that may be required: In order to facilitate the issuance of any permit or license affected by this approval, please bring a copy of this letter with you when applying for any permits or licenses that require this prior development approval. Additionally, an appeal of a Level Two approval (Flexible Development) may be initiated pursuant to Section 4 -502.B by the applicant or by any person granted party status within 14 days of the date of the CDB meeting. The filing of an application/notice of appeal shall stay the effect of the decision pending the final determination of the case. The appeal period for your case expires on January 31, 2006 (14 days from the date of the CDB meeting). February 22, 2006 Ghovaee — Page 3 If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call Wayne M. Wells, Planner III, at 727 -562 -4504. You can access zoning information for parcels within the City through our website: www.myclearwater.com/gov/depts/planning. *Make Us Your Favorite! Sincerely, MichMDI%CP Planning Director S: IPlanning DepnrtmentIC D BIFLEX (FLD)Ilnactive or Finished ApplicationslGul /view S 678 Playa Del Sol (T) #1 Mixed Use - ApprovedlGul /view S 678 Development Order.doc CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT POST OFFICE BOX 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758 -4748 MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562 -4567 FAX (727),562-4865 LONG RANGE PLANNING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW May 9, 2006 Ms. Doreen Williams , Northside Engineering Services Inc. 601 Cleveland Street, Suite # 930 Clearwater, Florida 33755 Re: Development Order — Minor Revision FLD2005 -07071 — 678 South Gulfview Boulevard Dear Ms. Williams: On February 21, 2006, the Community Development Board (CDB) approved with 13 conditions the above referenced case, which was a request for Flexible Development approval to permit a mixed use (3,650 square feet of office floor area, 27 attached dwellings and four overnight accommodation rooms /units) with reductions to the front (north along Bayway Blvd) setback from 15 feet to 9.6 feet (to building), from 15 feet to five feet (to existing pavement) and from 15 feet to zero feet (to trash staging area), reductions to the front (east along Parkway Drive) setback from 15 feet to 10.3 feet (to building) and from 15 feet to zero feet (to trash staging area), reductions to the side (west) setback from 10 feet to five feet (to pool and patio decks) and from 10 feet to zero feet (to existing pavement and sidewalk), reductions to the side (south) setback from 10 feet to 7.4 feet (to building), from 1.0 feet to zero feet (to trash staging area), and from 10 feet to zero feet (to existing sidewalk and pavement), a reduction to the side (east) setback from 10 feet to five feet (to pool deck) and an increase to building height from 35 feet to 85.08 feet (to roof deck) with an additional 5.67 feet for perimeter parapets (from roof deck), as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under. the provisions of Section 2- 803.C. A proposal has been submitted to modify the approved plans with the following two items: Remove the existing/proposed landscape area between the proposed building and the existing parking for Walgreen's on the west side for the purpose of providing a sidewalk to roll out the additional dumpster being provided for Walgreen's on the subject property to the trash staging area approved on Bayway Boulevard. Response: Criteria #6 of Section 4- 406.A.6 states that a minor revision is one which: "Does not result in a substantial modification or the cancellation of any condition placed upon the application as originally approved." In the "Analysis" section on page 5 for Case FLD2005- 07071, the Staff Report stated "All areas of the site will be heavily planted, including the area around the existing overnight accommodation building fronting on South Gulfview Boulevard, which will provide a pleasing appearance for this entire project. The areas on the west side of the site around the existing parking area for Walgreen's must also be improved to the same standard as the new areas of the site, which should be shown on a revised landscape plan prior to the issuance of any permits." The approval of this case by the CDB included Condition #6, which states: "That, prior to the issuance of any permits, the landscape plan be revised to show the west FRANK HIBBARD, MAYOR FiILLJONSON, VICE-MAYOR JOHN DORAN, COUNCILMEMIIER HOPI' HM,111TON, COUNCII.NH M]WR CARLIiN A. PIz1'ERSIiN, COUNCILMEMBE "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND Ai.-FIRMATIVI-, ACTION EMPLOYER" . ' I , ,. May 9, 2006 Williams — Page 2 side of the site improved to the same standard as the new areas of the site, acceptable to the Planning Department." The desired sidewalk would result in a substantial modification or cancellation of Condition #6 on the approval of FLD2005- 07071. In accordance with Section 4 -406.A of the Code, the revision proposed in Item #1 above is not deemed to be a minor revision and is DENIED. Should you desire to further pursue this sidewalk as desired, it would require an application to be submitted as an amendment to the originally approved project for review and decision by the CDB. Alternately, based on a site inspection and our discussion, it appears that this dumpster is not for Walgreen's but for the adjacent commercial uses to the west of the overnight accommodation use building. It is recommended that a dumpster enclosure for a rollout dumpster be constructed on the north side of the existing Walgreen's building where such would not interfere with this loading and dunipster area. This new dumpster could still be rolled to the proposed trash staging area shown on the approved plans. . An additional alternative would be to rework the existing dumpster enclosure north of Walgreen's to accommodate an additional fixed dumpster within this enclosure, thereby eliminating the need for the trash staging area on the subject property. 2. Reconfigure the side lot line between the adjacent commercial development to the west and south to allow the proposed amended, common lot line to run straight in a line rather than having a jog in the lot line. This change reduces the lot area for the subject property from 47,215 to 46,985 square feet. In conjunction with the reduction of the parcel size, the proposal reduces the proposed nonresidential building square footage from the approved 3,650 to 3,400 square feet. Response: This portion of the proposal actually takes property away from the subject parcel. The reduction in the parcel size; coupled with the reduction of the nonresidential building square footage, maintains the approved 27 attached dwelling units and four overnight accommodation rooms /units (see attached mixed -use calculation). A Minor Lot Adjustment will still be necessary, in compliance with Condition #3: "That, prior to the issuance of any permits, a Minor Lot Adjustment be submitted to the Planning Department, approved and recorded in the public records." In accordance with Section 4 -406.A of the Code, the revision proposed in Item #2 above is deemed to be a minor revision and is APPROVED. This minor revision must be shown on plans submitted to the Development Services Department for permitting purposes and on the Minor Lot Adjustment request to be filed with the Planning Department for approval. Should you have any questions, feel free to contact Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Planner III, at 727 -562 -4504. Sincerely, Michael elk, AICP Planning Director S: (Planning DepartmentlCD MFLBX (FLD)Ilnactive or Finished ApplicationslGulfview S 0678 Playa Del Sol (7) V Mixed Use - ApprovedlGulfview S 678 Minor Revisions Letter 5.9.06.doc t 5/5/06 Mixed Use Calculation for Playa Del Sol Property ­678 South Gulfview Boulevard A. Property is zoned Tourist District (maximum FAR = 1.0 and maximum density = 30 du /acre) 1. Permitted FAR ...................................... ............................1.0 2. Multiply #A1 by bldg sq. ftg. of retail & restaurant proposed...........x 3,400 sf 3. Lot area required to support #A2 in the building .........................= 3,400 sf 4. Lot area ................................. ........ .......... ... ................. 46,985 sf 5. Subtract the lot area required to support non - residential use in the building ( #A3) ..... ..............................- 3,400 sf 6. Lot area (sf) to calculate the maximum number of dwelling units ....= 43,585 sf 7. Divide #A6 ...................................... ............................... 43,585 sf 8. Land area in an acre ............. ............ ..............................— 43,560 sf 9. Lot acreage for residential portion ............ .............................. = 1.000 acres 10. Multiply #A9 ....................... ........ ............................... 1.000 acres 11. Maximum density ............................. ..............................x 30 du/acre 12. Maximum number of dwelling units permitted ........................ = 30 du B. Maximum Development Potential for Proae 1. Existing Overnight Accommodation Rooms/Units (OVA) to remain... 4 rooms 2. Conversion of OVA in #B Ito dwelling units (40/30 rule) ...... ........... 3 du 3. Maximum number of dwelling units (# Al2 ) ............................. 30 du 4. Subtract converted OVA to remain ( #B2) from #B3 ........................3 du 5. Maximum # of dwelling units ............... ............................... = 27 du April 21, 2006 Mr. Wayne Wells Planner III City of Clearwater Planning Department 100 S. Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, FL 33755 RE: Playa Del Sol FLD2005 -07071 Dear Mr. Wells: We would like to request a minor modification to the above approved plan. CIVI I_ • LAND PLANNING • ENV[ RON MENTAL • TRANSPOR -I NATION • In conversations with the adjacent property owners, the following has been determined:. 1. The dumpster cannot be rolled out to the curb. if cars are parked on the lot to the west. We can roll it out between the wheel stops and the building if we can remove the (2) 5" trees and either replace them elsewhere on the property or payment in lieu of replacement. 2. Another lot line adjustment from the original approved lot line adjustment following. the lot line to the east to straighten out the property lines for future development of the property to the south. The lot area will change and it has been calculated that we can reduce our rental space to 3,400 square feet. The approved rental space was 3,650. This will give us a 250 s.f. reduction. Please review the attached plans referencing the two above plan changes. If you have any questions or need additional information, do not hesitate to call. Sincerely, Den A. Willia Project Director Cc: Troy Perdue Dr. Harish Patel File Enc. 601 CLEVELAND STREET, SUITE 930 CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33755 NESADMIN @MiNDSPRIN6.00P,1\ NESTECH @PAlt,1DSPRIN6.COM 727 • 443 • 2869 FAX 727 • 446 • 8036 ORIGINAL RECEIVED APR 21 2000 PLANNING DEPA,RTMEW OIL' OF CLIP; WATER ORIGINAL RECEIVED APR- 21 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER DENSITY CACULATIONS: Proposed 41 Permitted Floor Area Ratio (FAR): 1.0 x Area of nonresidential portion: 3,400 s.f. = lot size required to support non — residential use: 3,400 s.f. Total area of site: 44,985 s.f. less non — residential use of 3,400 s.f. = 43585 s.f. = I.000L Ac. Less area - required to support Overnight Accomodations (40 Units /Acre) = 4,365 s.f. = 39,220 s.f.= 0.9004Ac Allowable density: 30 u.p.a. x 0.9004 Ac = 21 units. NON - RESIDENTIAL AREA : 4,294 S.F. EXISTING MOTEL UNITS 4 NEW CONDOMINIUM UNITS : 21 I C ITY OF C LEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT Pos-r OITIC. Box 4748, CLrAKWnrha Fl.olzlnn 33758 -4748 MUNICIPAL, Sr•.Kvlcrs I3uu.r�ING, 100 Soui'ii Mvlrru:: AvENUIi, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TEILEPIIONB (727) 562 -4567 FAX (727) 562 -4865 LANG RANGE PIANNING DIiVl ?LOPb11iN "1 Ri -ml ?W June 14, 2006 Ms. Doreen Williams Northside Engineering Services Inc. �i oar 601 Cleveland Street, Suite # 930 Clearwater, Florida 33755 Re: Development Order — Minor Revision FLD2005 -07071 — 678 South Gulfview Boulevard Dear Ms. Williams: On February 21, 2006, the Community Development Board (CDB) approved with 13 conditions the above referenced case, which was a request for Flexible Development approval to permit a mixed use (3,650 square feet of office floor area, 27 attached dwellings and four overnight accommodation rooms /units) with reductions to the front (north along Bayway Blvd) setback from 15 feet to 9.6 feet (to building), from 15 feet to five feet (to existing pavement) and from 15 feet to zero feet (to trash staging area), reductions to the front (east along Parkway Drive) setback from 15 feet to 10.3 feet (to building) and from 15 feet to zero. feet (to trash staging area), reductions to the side (west) setback from 10 feet to five feet (to pool and patio decks) and from 10 feet to zero feet (to existing pavement and 'sidewalk), reductions to the side (south) setback from 10 feet to 7.4 feet (to building), from 10 feet to zero feet (to trash staging area), and from 10 feet to zero feet (to existing sidewalk and pavement), a reduction to the side (east) setback from 10 feet to five feet (to pool deck) and an increase to building height from 35 feet to 85.08 feet (to roof deck) with an additional 5.67 feet for perimeter parapets (from roof deck), as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2- 803.C. A proposal has been submitted to modify the approved plans by revising the dumpster area at the southwest corner of the building to provide sufficient area for the storage of dumpsters serving the retail and restaurant building to the south and to provide a passageway through the ground floor of the parking garage to access the trash staging area on Bayway Boulevard. Provision of the passageway through the ground floor of the parking garage reduces provided parking from 86 to 84 spaces, which still exceeds required parking (including the provision of two parking spaces per dwelling unit). In accordance with Section 4 -406.A of the Code, the revisions proposed are deemed to be a Minor Revision and is APPROVED. These Minor Revisions must be shown on the site plans and building plans when submitting to the Development Services Department for building permits, with the following additional changes from the plans submitted June 2, 2006, and approved under this Minor Revision: Revise the Site Data table on Sheet C1.1 for provided parking (84 spaces) and for any associated changes to the impervious surface ratio and open space calculations due to the enlarged dumpster enclosure and sidewalks. Revise Sheets C4.1 and L1.1 to show the changes approved under this Minor Revision. FI ANK 1111MAIM, MIAMI, �uIIN I)�)rAN, CurN'�.ii,.�nt,w�,l.:r I IM I I1A%III:I'O.N, COI M I.M011tr:111 I AND APPIRNIA'IIVI? ACTION 1 "MITM Fk" June 14, 2006 Williams — Page 2 3. Revise Sheets C3.1, C4.1 and L1.1 to show sidewalks to access the east and west sides of the dumpster enclosure at the southwest corner of the building and a sidewalk from the north side of the building to the trash staging area. 4. Revise the architectural floor plan for the ground floor to reflect the passageway created through the parking garage. Should you have any questions, feel free to contact Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Planner III, at 727 -562 -4504. Sincerely, Michael Delk, CP Planning Director S: (Planning Department)C D BIFLEX (FLD) Unactive or Finished Applications)Gulfview S 0678 Playa Del Sol (7) #1 Mixed Use - ApprovedlGulJview S 678 Minor Revisions Letter 614.06.doc HE I (;�?a� l�1FSCf'IFIID� A PARCEL OF LAND LYING IN SECTION 17, TOWNSHIP 29 SOUTH, RANGE 15 EAST, CITY OF CLEARWATER, PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: A PORTION OF LOTS 9, 10, BLOCK B AND ALL OF LOTS 11, 12, 13 AND 15, BLOCK B OF BAYSIDE SUBDIVISION No. 5, ACCORDING TO THE MAP OR PLAT THEREOF, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 38, PAGES 38 -39 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA. BEING FURTHER DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT 13, BLOCK B; THENCE SOUTH 19'41'16" WEST, ALONG THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 13, BLOCK B, A DISTANCE OF 11720 FEET; THENCE NORTH 70'2956" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 83.51 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 21'2230" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 124.00 FEET TO A POINT ON THE ARC OF CIRCULAR CURVE CONCAVE TO THE NORTHEAST HAVING A RADIUS OF 2640.00 FEET; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE TO THE RIGHT, AN ARC DISTANCE OF 60.01 FEET A CHORD BEARING AND DISTANCE OF NORTH 73'20'38" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 60.01 FEET, TO A POINT ON A NON- RADIAL LINE; THENCE NORTH 20'37'52" EAST A DISTANCE OF 126.93 FEET, THENCE NORTH 70'2956" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 72.94 FEET; THENCE NORTH 19'30'04 " EAST, A DISTANCE OF 3.3,16 FEET; THENCE NORTH 70' 19'36" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 112.12 FEET; THENCE NORTH 18'2231 " EAST, A DISTANCE OF 117.66 FEET TO A POINT ON THE ARC OF A CIRCULAR CURVE CONCAVE TO THE SOUTHWEST, HAVING A RADIUS OF 4820.00 FEET, THENCE SOUTHEAST, ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE TO RIGHT, HAVING AN ARC DISTANCE OF 289,08 FEET, A CHORD BEARING AND DISTANCE OF SOUTH 695423" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 289,04 FEET TO THE POINT OF REVERSE CURVATURE OF A CIRCULAR CURVE CONCAVE TO THE NORTHEAST HAVING A RADIUS OF 1180.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTHEAST ALONG THE ARC OF SAID THE ARC OF SAID CURVE TO THE LEFT, HAVING AN ARC DISTANCE OF 43.74 FEET, A CHORD BEARING AND DISTANCE OF SOUTH 69'1510 1 " EAST, A DISTANCE OF 43.74 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. CONTAINING 47,215 SQUARE FEET, OR 1.0839 ACRES MORE OR LESS. FLOOD ZVONE NFORMATION THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY APPEARS TO LIE WITHIN FLOOD ZONE "AE" (EL. 11.0) PER FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP 125096 0104 G MAP REVISED: 09/03/2003 SURVEY INFORMATION PROVIDED BY A SIGNED & SEALED SURVEY BY: BRUCE A. KLEIN, PSM No. 5052 FLORIDA REGISTERED SURVEYOR DATED: 06/07/05 GROUND FLOOR NON RESIDENTIAL = J,650 IF PARKING SPACES = 40 2nd FLOOR 0 GAME ROOM = 2,146 S.F. PARKING SPACES = 46 FITNESS CENTER = 1,681 S. F. LOBBY = 2,886 S.F. 3rd FLOOR = 6 CONDO UNITS HALL = 1,716 S.F. STAIRS = 619 S.F. LOBBY = 652 S. F. 4th FLOOR = 6 CONDO UNl S HALL = 1,716 S.F. STAIRS = 619 S. F. LOBBY = 552 S. F. 5th FLOOR = 6 CONDO UNI HALL = 1, 716 S.F. STAIRS = 619 S.F. LOBBY = 652 S. F. 6th FLOOR = 5 CONDO UNIT HALL = 1,716 S.F. STAIRS = 619 S.F. LOBBY = 652 S. F. 7th FLOOR = 4 CONDO UNIT. HALL = 1, 716 S.F. STAIRS = 619 S. F. LOBBY = 652 S. F. 8th FLOOR = UPPER FLOOR P 3,650 S.F. NON RESID. ON 7th FLOOR. LOBBY = 573 S. F. STAIRS = 223 S. F. 4 UNITS �J1 SECTIO 7 TOWNSHW 29 S RANGE15 E MTV OF CLEARWATER PI NELLA:; COUNTY, FLORIDA. mllm ��� PARKING COUNT 1ST FLOOR 40 SPACES INC. 2 H.C. 2ND FLOOR 46 SPACES INC. 2 H.C. 181 I - A F: It i I I �__ C Ho r� 0 0 0 k"S" 0 T E DATA (PLAYA DEL SOL) EXIST. ELEVATION x EXIST. CONTOUR EXISTING=_(E) PROPOSED (P) REQUIRED NEW CONTOUR ZONING: T T T & DETAILS NEW UNDERDRAIN LAND USE: RFH RFH RFH EXIST. WATER SERVICE ® - - - - - - - - 42 OVERNIGHT MIXED USE NEW INLET 0 NEW SAN. MANHOLE USAGE: ACCOMODATIONS & OV OFFICE, RESIDENTIAL RNIGHT ACCOMMODATIONS) 0. K. LOT AREA: 47,569 S.F. 47,215 S.F. 5,000 S.F. 1.092 AC. 1.0839 AC. (MIN.) DENSITY - -- 3,650 S.F. NON RESID. 30 UNITS /ACRE & OF NEW UTILITY TO EXIST. M METER 27 ATTACHED DWELL 40 UNITS /ACRE HYDRANT ASSEMBLY F.D,C. FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTION T.B.O. TEMPORARY BLOW -OFF 4 OVERNIGHT ACCOMMODATIONS) AND VALVE BUILDING COVERAGE: 14,684 S.F. 21,808 S.F. (S.F. & % OF GROSS SITE) 31.1% 46.2% - -- GROSS FLOOR AREA (S.F.): 29,368 S.F. 3,650 S.F. NON RESID. F.A.R.: 0.62 0.08 1.0 9.6' TO BLDG.(N) 0' TO DUMPSTER PAD(N) EX, SIGNS ) VEM 16.3' TO PAVEMENT (S) FRONT: 20.1' 11.9' TO BLDG.(W) 0' TO DUMPSTER(W) 15' BLDG. SETBACKS: 11.9' TO BLDG.(E) 0' TO DUMPSTER(E) SOUTH (CONVENIENCE STORE) 7.4 TO BLDG. 0' TO TRASH STAGING 8' TO BLDG. 0' TO PAVEMENT SIDE: 20.1' ((W) 5' TO PAVEMENT SW ) 5' TO POOL DECK (SE) 10' 15' TO PAVEMENT (SE) BLDG. HEIGHT: 2 & 3 STORIES B.F.E. TO ROOFLINE 85.1' 35' -100' ROOF TO PARAPET 5.67' PAVED VEHICULAR USE AREA: (V. U. A.) 6,621 S.F. 2,773 S.F. N/A IMPERVIOUS SURFACE RATIO: 28,334 S.F. 40,754 S.F. (I.S.R.) 0.60 0.86 0.95 MAX. OPEN SPACE: 18,881 S.F. 6,461 S.F. (S.F. & Y. OF GROSS SITE) 40% 13,7% 5% MIN. PARKING LOT INTERIOR LANDSCAPING: 598 S.F. (S.F. & % OF V.U.A.) - -- 21.6% 10% OF V.U.A. PARKING: - -- 86 73 PARKING CALCULATIONS: OFFICE = 3,650 S.F. x 4/1000 = 15 SPACES RESIDENTIAL = 2 PER UNIT = 54 SPACES EX. (4) UNITS = 1 SP. PER ROOM = 4 SPACES TOTAL SPACES REQUIRED = 73 SPACES I - A F: It i I I �__ C Ho r� 0 0 SITE PLAN APPROVED CASE # .,F!,P "dr- o 71 CASE TYPE G1 IZ.P DRC DATE z Z 81 DS CD'B DATE z'liI 10 (0 SIGNATUF"E DATA See 7w..(rpW4- J ZU - 1 11 .-, T,' C1.1 0 C2.1 DEMOLITION SITE PLAN EXIST. ELEVATION x EXIST. CONTOUR 10 NEW ELEVATION +10.00 NEW CONTOUR ®10s EXIST. STORM SEWER �. NEW STORM SEWER & DETAILS NEW UNDERDRAIN ©mommmmmomm i EXIST. SAN, SEWER �.®. NEW SAN. SEWER EXIST. WATER SERVICE ® - - - - - - - - NEW WATER SERVICE m ® m = m NEW INLET 0 NEW SAN. MANHOLE O NEW CLEAN- OUT(C.O.) ® ®n® NEW BUILDING AREA �LL_LLLLLI_t.LLLLII.'- 1_LI_LL I_LI NEW ASPHALT NEW CONCRETE TEMP. SILT BARRIER POINT OF CONNECTION OF NEW UTILITY TO EXIST. M METER B. F. P. D. BACKFLOW PREVENTION DEVICE F.H.A. FIRE HYDRANT ASSEMBLY F.D,C. FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTION T.B.O. TEMPORARY BLOW -OFF T. &V. TAP AND VALVE SITE PLAN APPROVED CASE # .,F!,P "dr- o 71 CASE TYPE G1 IZ.P DRC DATE z Z 81 DS CD'B DATE z'liI 10 (0 SIGNATUF"E DATA See 7w..(rpW4- J ZU - 1 11 .-, T,' C1.1 CIVIL SITE DATA C2.1 DEMOLITION SITE PLAN C3.1 STAKING SITE PLAN C4.1 GRADING, DRAINAGE & UTILITIES SITE PLAN C5.1 CIVIL SITE DETAILS L1.1 LANDSCAPE SITE PLAN & DETAILS 8 ORIGINA RECEIVED DEB 13 2006 _ wr�EPARIM c A' Issue Date: 08125/05 Revisions: No. Date Description 10106105 PER CITY �s 0 0 0 D 1 THIS DRAWING IS AN I 7RM QFRVjCePJJ ShIA L'�iF�IvIA THE PROPERTY OF THE ENGINEER, AND SHAL NOT R. QDJ�E P11 L OR.W$ IN ANY WAY WITHOUT THE CONSENT OF TH, ;NGI r4E �° Ff l`0 �J ��(� YRIGwrr2 OS NOT PUBLISHED kl ti =r5n 1 3 200 COPIE OF; THE�C Ply$ ARF��lp7 V L 6"'UNLESS EMBOSSED, WITH 7H� °SIGNM& 'EN `,I EER'S SEAL a. uni <r ��p„maammam ®® ;D- rnN('. CUTTER i o "omm®asom®mo ®m EX. TREE LEGEND 10" DENOTES PALM TREE - SIZE INDICATED O 10" DENOTES A PINE TREE - SIZE INDICATED 0 10" DENOTES AN OAK TREE - SIZE INDICATED A TREE LABELED "TWIN" IS 2 TRUNKS MEASURED 4' ABOVE THE GROUND FROM 1 MAIN TRUNK, "TRIPLE" IS 3 TRUNKS MEASURED 4' ABOVE THE GROUND FROM 1 MAIN TRUNK 0 - s �� -- — -- - -- --r ,--� Ism m cs ass r$ - -- - -- ��m ®es ® ®m ®am m�rrlmmeamIs0a0 ®Imsa ® ®�as9 ammoaora ® ®emoamam ® ®maar®ovgoama3oaa® �60 Ea IN W NIP Laaeaaa® r�mmm® am mmmaUma ® ®omasa ®� ®a�tmea ®mmmmsa ®® 6„ RECLAIMED WATER j wv \ AT RAL 1 �I • lRA l i'►' 1- 1 V RL Y D. 6�o p '�N l �/ ® _ 110 (0 - -- - b� - - - - -- - UTILITY & \k 60' g P,6B. 38 G PG SF 38 Y39) S6 R =1 18 00 0' A=43, 74' -- - - M SAN,5. P06fvH ❑LE - - � EX, SAN. MANHOLE 5 DRAINAGE, - - SIDEWALK EASEMENT \I EX. 6" WATER --\ CHD, =43. 74' (P &M R I M. = 6. 08 A AI,_T ' VENT ® ® ® ® I NV, = 0. 57-1111, � NV, - 0. F 42-3-42 �S 5 �E( 12"). ooamm m� � -7 �� a� R,, EX, Zj O�'/ EX, �`�� �� �� 1, �?:' �j'' �i / LATERAL a 2 "R/, 6D LATERAL C ❑NC, GUTTER Q - ° - -- d - °�'- 1% d -� -R =4820. 00'° A°= 289, 0 CHD. =289. 04' (P &M) CB =S69° 54' 23° E(P ZPP EX. LATERAL_ wPP 41f�P�� \4,./ EX, F maa® IOUs ® ®ep- a� ®m- earsam�car�ea -I® ®e9® m� ®t� ® ®mm inp0On000®mP®®®m®mommmosmow#j- ®rammaoa ® ® ® ® ® ® ®aa ® ® ®© am ® ®m n ®mm ®camm®aaImcm mm®aa® dhiirea�mih146aTem 77777 CAa0cm0 ®ma ° ° ° BF WM oa na � 1=11 am ® © oaa ® ma ® ® am - n I— am-® �- ° BFP� WM EX. TRAN / '1 p ® ® �' \ 0 D° WLP 1(� 12 !� r� NLET I NLE1 ,® ,/ _ - - - - --� I ° Cgf�CRETE �• �- --j- YEI �/ -_T__ � WEIR sv ,°j I I APRON I 5 10' SETBACK L I N ,ca F, / 8 P. B. 38, PGS. 38 -39 h2 ° ✓ I ��� 7�� I �' ° - 1- 1- 1- 1�- 1- 1� -I���d * _ _ \� �� �I % e I -1 __1 __l -1-1 -1 1-1 -1 -I � -1-1 -1 1-1 -� � ASPHALT ° s >� PARKING -1 -1 -1 d I i -�` I ° �� aj, El v ° _ -1--I -1 --1-1 : °• ° ° 5 �`� -I -1 -1 3 s �-' T ° °. P ° v I M - - — -� - E1 u R. B I A B S,G P SSE 731 1732' `I - n °D ° ° ° d. 121 I , °I ° I d 1—1 - -- I 2) STORY C, B. S. � 11 -1-1 -1 -1-1 -1 � d I I * (2) STORY C. B. S. � � ��cp c \n �0 ° 1ADDRESS #678D 1-1-1 ° RK�c E SOT J. d I w -1 - ADDRESS #678B I 1 q ° ° \ ' o ° Oj ' _ -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 I I / I I� CONCRETE PARKING CONCRETE PARKING ° ° °G ° ° w``' N a g I= .UNDER BUILDING I °/ w 1 BUILDING: o m f F _ l ° ° ������- 1� -1dWI \ TENNIS, COURTS / I� I UNDER 6 --� �-� ° C3 e/ 6 GARAGE Lam• -6. 18� —I °/6 ° ° I I \\ -WITH 6 CHA I fd- c� —I IIGARAGE EL, - C ❑NCR TE ° z a 88 -' ° rr ° ° o ° C 2) STORY C, B. S. dv r I I _z - DRIVEWAY 3� 0 I I :o sp �, ►� ° ADDRESS #678C I du I I / LINK FENCE I ( o `� o X1-1 1-1-1 I I -1 _ -1 ° ° p ° -1 -1 --1 dO I � � _ ° C ❑NCRETE PARKING \ _4 ° �® ;D a N I� -- -I -1 , _]GAR GE E L L=6 72 -1 d I I °3 I A cu �, �, N ° b� - -1 I -i 1 1-1-1- ° -I -1 -I -1-1 d I �I _I -I -_I �l -1 Li (UI W C) A m 1-1 -1 I 11-1 -1 -1 w I T Ld I y ®` \� �`�' m z -s O r�rl Z �c4} ASPHAL Ib I _ _ ° —° °— PLANTER ° �d Z II ��?� — —� -1 —� °�6 bi C) PARKING ��� 1 ������ -�� o� d o i-1 ° ® I � ® LEI 70 -0 -- - ` 1 �_� I PLANTER I I { I — -�jI 4 I� ® j`` ^� co w I y- D_E".— - 1 -- — i _l — j ( 1 > S TO R Y C, B. S. N o °- ° ° �. ° —1 —1 —1 —I —1 —1 5 I-- m > n r�L ®ma asm m. ass FL ®. am: I ® J COMMERCIAL o , _ �. ° s ( /C ❑NCRETE' - d 'O I I to• G,, \�� `` ' 'S� ¢ k- j� a 0 -' = Z w �'1 ® u u� o z D `� PARKING EASEMENT �� - - °6 6- I ° -1 -1 I -I -1 - - - i S 5, 5 I \;' m ri w I I �:, I -- © w G1 ❑. B. 6835, PGS. 1731 -1732° I -1 -1 -1 -I -I -1 �d Z �- - 10•L-ANT 5 9 5; �° a' �w °� w SPILLWAY E ° ° ° tri —1 �l —1 1-1-1 —1-1 —I —1-1 !I ° ° ° I X, ,.. _ 12' ° _ U, 1 �,' r 4' C. ❑f dCRETE S1 DEWAU< - -� --► -I �-1 m V ° - ° 1 ° ' � SPAS b ° k ® ® mm W 1, C P &M) ' oa; ¢ ® x / ►� ® a� ® m m I _ N 7 0 2 9 5 6 \, �S W u� W N700 29' 56"W 184. 99' (P &M) 'r `� f ® ® ®ml 2❑ �'" ^� I e 1 a: W P ❑ND A L L GRASS \ to / --- l 17 I POOL ° I° _o, 7' CONIC, DRAINAGE / s ° / BLOCK WALL C ONC. WALK ��� Q ° 1' ° II o� ENCROACHMENT EASEMENT ❑NC'° ° �� �/ j 4 I d O. R. B, 7173, PGS. 1896 -1899 09 °���° DRAINAGE EASEMENT ❑. R. B. 10971, PAGES 398 -400 ASPHALT ,� ° ° ° '��i ° ° COVERED Id r� (1) STORY C. B. S, I 10„ (1) STORY C. B. S. PARI:ING ° ADDRESS #696 i _ ADDRESS #672 rQ\, 8„ v� COMMERCIAL ®� COMMERCIAL E ASPHALT o ° m �� -�- °� PARKING Q �� m x ` p z zz fll I I is 2 \ •�r, rn o In ° 13 !- -quo C • V� K (n co . I <F a 0 R I C K ° ° ° 3 `� 10' DRAINAGE, UTILITY & SIDEWALK EASEMENT 1 ,PAIVERS ° ° 0 by I w G SIDEWALK EASEMENT ❑, R, B. 10971, PAGES 408 -410, I� �I P ` °� ul ❑, R. B, 6958, PGS, 423 -424 ASPHALT ti� �: I „ �� ASPHALT PARKING ASPHALT ° C❑NCc ° % PARKING PARKING 0' SETBACK LINE B, 38, PGS, 38 -39 > BR I CK PHONE -- p - - - -- -EX, FHA - - - - - - - - - - - - - -— - c� $ I 6 ` WPP _ a 48� B❑X I® am m ' � •`� -.9 � ---- _ my ®� ern ®� � m° ma m' EX, 6" WATER ---- -- tz' EX, 5' ALK m I I�- 5' CONCRETE SIDEWALK c:, Ada ®® oa-ca� m+�°m °'- ® `� _ - -- L' \ ®mom �! �® ®� ®ma sUm ®¢e ®oUme9e oamen ®® ® ® ® ®sa ®mn13IM as oa mp��I ee ® ®now as y� \`� �m HD, =60, 01' ( P &M) ® ® CB =N73° 20' 38' W( P &M) SOUTH GULFVIEWI/ BOULEVA _ ____ \J asa Ono on ae 60 RIGHT -❑F -WAY ( P. B. 38, PGS, 38-39) oam 01200 Ummamamm ® ®mmiarsmsa® ® ® ®oamm¢aouomrmmcwsar ®uaoa t�l smaes ®Ieasro ® ® ®® ®cam ® ®� ®PHA ®m ® PAVEMENT ® ® ® ® ® ® ® ® ®m®Im mm ®I� maaas ® ®aa ®mamsamow ®ane� / /_ - J% C ❑NC. CURB 8 GUTTEREX, 12" RECLAIMED WATER DEMOLITION NOTES REMOVE: CONCRETE :............ BRICK PAVERS l_LLLLLI_1_LLLLLLLL LLLLI_LLLLI_LLLLLL LLLI_LLLLLLLLLLLL 1 -CELL BUILDING DEMOLITION OF THE SITE INCLUDES THE REMOVAL /RELOCATION OF ALL EXISTING STRUCTURES WITHIN PROJECT AREA, PAVING AND BASE, UTILITY LINES (SANITARY SEWER, STORM PIPES, WATER LINES, POWER POLES, OVERHEAD AND UNDERGROUND POWER AND TELEPHONE CABLES, GAS LINES, TREES, SHRUBS, ETC.) AND IS NOT LIMITED TO WHAT'S SHOWN. REMOVE CONCRETE PADS AND CONCRETE WALKS TO THE NEAREST EXPANSION JOINT. 2❑ REMOVE BRICK PAVERS 3❑ REMOVE EXISTING STRUCTURE AND FOOTING. 4❑ REMOVE EXISTING WALL. 50 REMOVE /RELOCATE TREE. 6] REMOVE FENCE AND GATE AND ASSOCIATED POSTS. 7❑ REMOVE EXISTING LIGHT POLE. 8 ALL CAVITY & EXCAVATION RESULTING FROM REMOVAL OF TREES, SHRUBS, PIPES, INLETS, GREASE TRAPS, SIGN, AND POLE BASE SHALL BE FILLED WITH APPROVED SUITABLE MATERIAL AND COMPACTED IN 12" LIFTS TO 95% OF MAX DENSITY. 9 OFF -SITE DISPOSAL OF STRUCTURES, UTILITIES AND CONSTRUCTION DEBRIS SHALL OCCUR IN SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL FACILITIES APPROVED BY F.D.E.P., AND PINELLAS COUNTY, ORIGINAL RECEIVED JAN 112006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT IV OF C EA WA ER SCALE, VaW 20 0 10 20 40 Issue Date: 08/25/05 Revisions: No. Date Description I I I I 3 I PER CITY Q10106105 �1 0 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 _ _ 0 / 111•s THIS DRAWING IS AN INSTRUMENT OF SERVICE AND SHALL ��A R iRdY ` jHR ENGINEER, AND SHALL NOT BE REPRODUCED, PUBLISHED '� � ANl THE CONSENT OF THE ENGINEER. ©CO YR OP5 cj III �Jt!S EdY.z Ems A w� f� RAM A. GOEL Ph. D. P. E. `��� • �'�� ` ° °' COPIES OF THESE PLANS ARE NOT 3 •6SSlt` ~� • EMBOSSED WITH THE SIGNING ENGIN L•. L O�`,p�s '-„ I I I I 3 I �1 E - L3HW -- -- -- C}f-tW -- -- -- Di t��/- - -G" wl�P - -17H�/ - - . WPI� _ - -- - - - - - - -- -_ — - ❑ H vJ - - - G H iJ -. Q H bJ Bf-I W__ - - -fli�I 'vim -- - - BH'v J- - . - ElH W=- -- {-{ 1- __. W P F 2' CONC, GUTTER �- INLEl - 03 NOR Tp.I BA YWA YBOULE r 60' RIGHT -OF-WAY \ - -- - - - - - - -- - - - -- - -- - - - - - - -- -- a -- 07' -RAI - -- -_ H.C. SIGN (TYP.) In ti A' N7 �1�`36 "W(M) 11P,1P'(M> ,u1LL;uAY 4Q HIGH VINYL Q— — -i d PROPOSED E�. I' WALK 10 3,16 M) 7P.94'(M) 5 ® ® 'R ° ® 83,63'(M) PROPERTY LlN NE b4' 5' WALK PROPERTY LINE N19 °30' M) N70 °29'56 "WCP &M) ROLL –OUT .. ` j", C-31 710 � � . SPA p.7 Cp,C TRASH STAGING AR A 3 Y D OUMPSTER 6 x3.5 \ ' 'RETAIL ROLL –OUT CON (/, WALK; 4' HIGH POOL FENCE 17 5' ( 1) STORY C.-13''- C'� AUD � h'ES_ S �G 72 ► "'""� COMMERL'IAL_ ASPHALT PARKING 5' CONCRETE SIDEWALK P' CONC, CURB & GUTTER E0' RIGHT —OF —WAY (P,B. 38, PGS, 38 -39) 36' ASPHALT PAVEMENT ?' CONC. CURB & GUTTER ASPHALT PARKING �1 12'1` ,SOUTH 10 N 06 o_ - w � a 0i t w o r: cu Z 5' a a POOL LUCK WALL IT 2: CONVENIENCt STONE 06 'FINAL STOP' • llp° � 0 - ~l�R= 2640.00' A= 60,01' CHD,= 60.01'(P &M) CB= N73 °20'38'W(P &M) GULFVIEW BOULEVARD L7 WPP — ..— _ __-- '-0 H W -- — Eii-{'vf- al vJ .- G_. r� Ld G? Y CL u 0 cu I IINLE I n � L)1 1 ,x? L c \� LL_ IJ G 7 T f]" �_ co rZ rr cr) (Q I � LLj L.1 2 CL I- <E Z (1 U-) ORIGINAL RECEIVED JUN 02 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT NOTES: CITY OF CLEARWATER I. ALL PROPOSED FREE STANDING OR BUILDING SIGNAGE SHALL BE INSTALLED BY OTHERS. ALL PROPOSED SIGNAGE SHALL MEET SIGN CODE REQUIREMENTS, 2. ALL UNUSED DRIVE APRONS AND /OR PARKING SURFACES ARE TO BE REMOVED IN ITS ENTIRETY, BY THE CONTRACTOR, AT THE APPLICANTS EXPENSE. THE RIGHT -OF- WAYS) ARE TO BE RESTORED WITH NEW SIDEWALK AND SOD AD REQUIRED, J. ANY NEW CONCRETE DRIVEWAY APRON(S) CONSTRUCTED WITHIN THE RIGHT -OF -WAY SHALL BE A MINIMUM 6" THICK FIBROUS CONCRETE, AND A MINIMUM 3,000 PSI WITH 6 "x6 "/10x10 W.W.M. 4. SIDEWALKS AND SIDEWALK RAMPS ADJACENT TO OR A PART OF THE PROJECT SHALL BE DESIGNED AND CONSTRUCTED CONSISTENT WITH CITY OF CLEARWATER CONTRACT SPECIFICATIONS AND STANDARDS INDEX //109, INCLUDING THE A. D.A. (TRUNCATED DOMES PER F.D.D. T. INDEX #304.) 5. A SEPARATE R.O.W. PERMIT WILL BE REQUIRED FOR ALL WORK WITHIN THE R, O. W. IF ANY OF THE ADJACENT STREET(S) THAT ARE ASSIGNED TO THE CITY 6. DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE TO BE NO HIGHER THAN 6' AND BE CONSTRUCTED OF CONCRETE BLOCK. MATERIALS TO BE CONSISTENT WITH THOSE USED IN CONSTRUCTION OF AND ARCHITECTURAL STYLE OF PRINCIPAL BUILDING. EX. TREE TD BE REMOVED j \� 10" DLNC.?7E3 PAI_Ik /1 1'I2LE - ILL_ iI.ILiIC;ll:l; DENU -[ES A PINT- 1 RE: - Si ?C f 10" OENO-I ES AN OAK TRCF_ `BIZ[: Ii,IL71C � I f;Li A T RFE LAH -FLED "1 WIN" 1"; 2 TNUNK.`7 fv1[_,1' -il if <I: L7 4' , \BC)VC THE GROUND FROM 1 MAIN I RI- 1Nf-:, "TPIPLf_" IS TRUI\II °;S PACA` L)RF -D 4' AH0 \11 If-11E, GROUND FROM 1 MAIN TRt-INK SCALE, 1" =20' 20 0 10 20 40 THIS DRAWING IS AN INSTRUMENT OF SERVICE AND SHAL4� !%N tljl e' ERTY *,THE ENGINEER, AND SHALL NOT BE REPRODUCED, PUBLISHFF�� qq�� tyS,ED•17<J A�IJY�M4y WITHOdj THE CONSENT OF THE ENGINEER. (C�S A gNT 2�,O�iS:+ I-ROT PUBLISHE'4 . G • 1 Os�,� INS ` o RAM A. GOEL, Ph.D., P_ E. 1 gt,P - '. �• `�' COPIES OF THESE PLANS ARE NOT VA TD UNII�T�SS y' ••''g} EMBOSSED WITH THE SIGNING ENGINES SaS,�ALL` „�5�,•X 1. is i 1• j NEW 3.67' u l CONC. WALK fTl m Q WPP I, a: 0, r*1 Q V) , I� - 15' 18.7' _ IIa TRi FORMER Gl N 1Ba <�� I PHONE BOX yA ti Wf'P 0 1A/P'L. - ~l�R= 2640.00' A= 60,01' CHD,= 60.01'(P &M) CB= N73 °20'38'W(P &M) GULFVIEW BOULEVARD L7 WPP — ..— _ __-- '-0 H W -- — Eii-{'vf- al vJ .- G_. r� Ld G? Y CL u 0 cu I IINLE I n � L)1 1 ,x? L c \� LL_ IJ G 7 T f]" �_ co rZ rr cr) (Q I � LLj L.1 2 CL I- <E Z (1 U-) ORIGINAL RECEIVED JUN 02 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT NOTES: CITY OF CLEARWATER I. ALL PROPOSED FREE STANDING OR BUILDING SIGNAGE SHALL BE INSTALLED BY OTHERS. ALL PROPOSED SIGNAGE SHALL MEET SIGN CODE REQUIREMENTS, 2. ALL UNUSED DRIVE APRONS AND /OR PARKING SURFACES ARE TO BE REMOVED IN ITS ENTIRETY, BY THE CONTRACTOR, AT THE APPLICANTS EXPENSE. THE RIGHT -OF- WAYS) ARE TO BE RESTORED WITH NEW SIDEWALK AND SOD AD REQUIRED, J. ANY NEW CONCRETE DRIVEWAY APRON(S) CONSTRUCTED WITHIN THE RIGHT -OF -WAY SHALL BE A MINIMUM 6" THICK FIBROUS CONCRETE, AND A MINIMUM 3,000 PSI WITH 6 "x6 "/10x10 W.W.M. 4. SIDEWALKS AND SIDEWALK RAMPS ADJACENT TO OR A PART OF THE PROJECT SHALL BE DESIGNED AND CONSTRUCTED CONSISTENT WITH CITY OF CLEARWATER CONTRACT SPECIFICATIONS AND STANDARDS INDEX //109, INCLUDING THE A. D.A. (TRUNCATED DOMES PER F.D.D. T. INDEX #304.) 5. A SEPARATE R.O.W. PERMIT WILL BE REQUIRED FOR ALL WORK WITHIN THE R, O. W. IF ANY OF THE ADJACENT STREET(S) THAT ARE ASSIGNED TO THE CITY 6. DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE TO BE NO HIGHER THAN 6' AND BE CONSTRUCTED OF CONCRETE BLOCK. MATERIALS TO BE CONSISTENT WITH THOSE USED IN CONSTRUCTION OF AND ARCHITECTURAL STYLE OF PRINCIPAL BUILDING. EX. TREE TD BE REMOVED j \� 10" DLNC.?7E3 PAI_Ik /1 1'I2LE - ILL_ iI.ILiIC;ll:l; DENU -[ES A PINT- 1 RE: - Si ?C f 10" OENO-I ES AN OAK TRCF_ `BIZ[: Ii,IL71C � I f;Li A T RFE LAH -FLED "1 WIN" 1"; 2 TNUNK.`7 fv1[_,1' -il if <I: L7 4' , \BC)VC THE GROUND FROM 1 MAIN I RI- 1Nf-:, "TPIPLf_" IS TRUI\II °;S PACA` L)RF -D 4' AH0 \11 If-11E, GROUND FROM 1 MAIN TRt-INK SCALE, 1" =20' 20 0 10 20 40 THIS DRAWING IS AN INSTRUMENT OF SERVICE AND SHAL4� !%N tljl e' ERTY *,THE ENGINEER, AND SHALL NOT BE REPRODUCED, PUBLISHFF�� qq�� tyS,ED•17<J A�IJY�M4y WITHOdj THE CONSENT OF THE ENGINEER. (C�S A gNT 2�,O�iS:+ I-ROT PUBLISHE'4 . G • 1 Os�,� INS ` o RAM A. GOEL, Ph.D., P_ E. 1 gt,P - '. �• `�' COPIES OF THESE PLANS ARE NOT VA TD UNII�T�SS y' ••''g} EMBOSSED WITH THE SIGNING ENGINES SaS,�ALL` „�5�,•X 1. is i 1• j r 3 k t F Q s i I, a: , I , I , it NOTES; 1. EXISTING ABOVEGROUND UTILITY FACILITIES IN THE PUBLIC RIGHT -OF -WAY TO BE RELOCATED AND / OR PLACED UNDERGROUND WHEN THE PROPERTY WHICH THE UTILITIES SERVE IS REDEVELOPED. 2. FOR DEVELOPMENT THAT DOES NOT INVOLVE A SUBDIVISION, ALL UTILITIES INCLUDING INDIVIDUAL DISTRIBUTION LINES SHALL BE UNDERGROUND UNLESS SUCH UNDERGROUNDING IS NOT PRACTICABLE. 3. NEW WATERLINES TO BE MIAIIMUM 30" DEEP MAX. OF 42" DEEP. 4. PROPOSED UNDERGROUND WATER MAINS & HYDRANT(S) TO BE INSTALLED AND BE IN SERVICE PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION PER NFPA 241. 5. FDC SHALL BE IDENTIFIED BY A SIGN THAT STATES 'NO PARKING FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTION. " 6. FDC SHALL HAVE A 7 -112' CLEARANCE TO FRONT AND SIDES. 7 FHA SH, LL HAVE A 7 -112' • CLEARANCE TO FRONT AND SIDES AND 4' CLEARANCE TO REAR. 8. THE CITY OF CLEARWATER WILL PROVIDE WATER TAP, SET THE WATER METER AND B.FP.D. (BACKFLOW PREVENTION DEVICE) ONLY, APPLICANT IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE WATER MAIN EXTENSIONS FROM THE TAP TO THE DEVICE. APPLICANT IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL ASSOCIATED FEES AND ALL ALL OTHER INSTALLATION COSTS. 9. DUCTILE IRON PIPE MUST BE INSTALLED BETWEEN ANY TAP AND WATER METER, DUCTILE IRON PIPE MUST BE INSTALLED BETWEEN ANY TAP AND 34CKFLOW PREVENTION DEVICE. AT LEAST ONE JOINT OF DUCTILE IRON PIPE SHALL BE INSTALLED ON THE SERVICE SIDE OF ANY BACKFLOW PREVENTION DEVICE. 10. ALL UTILITY POLE RELOCATIONS TO BE COORDINATED WITH THE OWNERS OF SUCH FACILITIES AS -NOTED ON DRAWINGS. THE POLE RELOCATION'S WILL ACCOMMODATE THE PROPOSED SIDEWALK AND /OR DRIVE APRONS INSTALLATION WITHIN THE RIGHT -OF -WAYS OF THE ADJACENT STREETS. CITY REQUIRES A MIN. 2 -FT. HORIZONTAL CLEARANCE FROM EDGE OF SIDEWALK TO ANY VERTICAL OBSTRUCTION. ® ®mom ®rm,memm 11. ALL POLYVINYL CHLORIDE PIPES SHALL BE LAID W /AN INSULATED 12 GAUGE A.W.G. SOLID STRAND COPPER WIRE WOUND AROUND THE PIPE FORMING ONE COMPLETE SPIRAL PER JOINT OF PIPE. THIS WIRE IS TO BE CONTINUOUS W /SPLICES MADE ONLY BY METHODS APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER. THIS WIRE IS TO BE SECURED TO ALL VALVES, TEES & ELBOWS. SEE CITY OF CLEARWATER CONTRACT SPECIFICATIONS AND STANDARDS, PART 'B': TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS, SECTION IV, ARTICLE 41.02(8)(2). 12. ALL UNDERGROUND FIRE LINES SHALL COMPLY WITH NFPA -24 AND BE INSTALLED BY A LICENSED CLASS 5 UNDERGROUND CONTRACTOR. 13. ALL FIRE HYDRANT ASSEMBLIES INSTALLED GREATER THAN 10 ft. FROM A WATER MAIN SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED WITH DUCTILE IRON PIPE AND SHALL HAVE A GATE VALVE AT THE TEE ON THE BRANCH LINE, AND AT THE FIRE HYDRANT ASSEMBLY (FHA.). 14. FHA INSTALLED GREATER THAN 10' FROM A WATER MAIN SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED WITH DUCTILE IRON PIPE & SHALL HAVE A GATE VALVE AT THE TEE ON THE BRANCH LINE, AND AT THE FHA. 15. THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, AT THE APPLICANT'S EXPENSE, WILL REMOVE /RELOCATE ANY /ALL WATER METERS THAT HAVE TO BE RELOCATED AS PART OF THIS DEVELOPMENT, INCLUDING RECLAIM WATER METERS. (NO METERS SHALL BE LOCATED WITHIN ANY IMPERVIOUS AREAS). 16. ALL WATER /FIRE HYDRANT MAIN EXTENSIONS TO CONFORM TO CITY STANDARDS. 17. FIRE DEPT, CONNECTION SHALL BE INSTALLED AT LEAST 15' FROM THE FACE OF THE BLDG. 18. F.D.C. SHALL BE LOCATED NO MORE THAN 40' FROM A FIRE HYDRANT. NEW 16'x6" TAP & VALVE Ex. 16" D.I.P. ® ®mmeaman ® ®murom ®ua ® ®® miss ® ®amm®a NEW 6" D.LP. 2 EW 6'X6" T &V 41 16JOINT PAST DCVA A(EW 6" D.I.P. p NEry r � ;, X2 TEE 6' MIN. COVER DC 6'EG�yV. NEW FHA ® NDCVA6, NEW 6" PVC DR 18 p 0 6'G.V. 36" MIN. COVER NEW 1 -1/2" ® ■Wmcddimmmmm�mm5 M &BFP p p �amm mmommsmm■. p p p p 4mm ®mmm m ®mm�amb p p NEW 2" PVC DOM. W ® p 36" MIN. COVER ® p ® p p NEW 4" PVC DR 14 F p p 36" MIN, COVER p p p NEW 2" PVC DOM. W p p 36" MIN. COVER p `2 WPP WPP - - ❑H-W - H d - - -ORW - Of/ - - - ❑- .p}}W - _ -. -- Ht - - - 8HW- - - ff{ I - - _ t-3t�1 W _ _ - - W-- _ - -- ESE- - - - - - -- 'uf -- - -= I -�--- -- - OHS >✓ - - - . � %' � � samcmeuu�em®® ®m ®mameeam ® ®®n-- m ®t■ ®m ®m mm ®,m ®g�I� cmm ®m ®m ®mm ®m® ®® ®mmm m® -� - smmcaa��+ ®mews ® w \6P 6 �AI�IE�TER �\"� �� ®m j m mr® en fm m ®eemsym ®o-umm" mmr.mr�amm�um,m �smcam+m ®� � N \ /' _SANITARY MANHOLE_ RIM EL.= 5.32 €Y 2b 2� EX. LATERAL \b - -DR THBA YWA YB®U.�B �ARI� _ � �' _ �� `��- a _.- - __- .___-- ._- ___ -_. - - -__ .t/ _. - -_ -- b� S 60' RIGH1 - ❑� -WAY -. - -- * - \ - -- - -- 'SI,, o CP,B, 38, PGS, 38 -39) A4\6,-, \ R= 80.00' A= 43,74' EX, SAN -- M�1t�1H[]I�E �\ \S�EX• SAN, MAIM I❑LDL�INAGE, UTILITY & '�0 \ HD. -43,74 <P &M) RIM• = 5, 6 `"6 \ I� RIM, = 6, 08 SIDEWALK EASEMEhJ f ASL TiVENT EX. 6' WATEF: - =S15 QCP CNV, O, 01R 69�� PG "23- 4 ti� EX m� w V' 0, JJ �� �j/ Z E ' LAT. vJ% NEW 6" PVC / � >� LATE$BD.� A= 289,08' CHD, =28 'CP& ) CB =S6 54 "ACC M) �`% SE SLOPE I r &v! emu® ®F�.mm ®FSCammmmm���� '- °'"- am -m - ®- - ® ®m ®®nm ®lmmoomm ®m ®m ® ® ®¢�cimmm ®mmmm ®m ommm _ ® ®m ®m ¢am ®® ® ® ®m ® ® ®mm ®® mm ®ca® ®en -' mi�gnr�s- w- = =� LA I �Kr9l ,/Pp�r� ua..... gj; tO�J� C! go o EX. FH mmmmm ®mmm s9 ®ae�m ®® m mmm® ®® ��m�Fgmmm ®mo ®mm ma,' mmm ®mn® m ®® ® ® ®m ® ® ®® mm ® ® ® ®m® m ® ® ® ®��saaey ®¢emim ®® ® m ®'� �Hi ✓�' -- -- C/ �SANITA h1ANfI ❑LE T)r d - a� ® ® o, ^� ® m ©BF O o / ® 0 0 .0 E9� �` ` P,IM EL =C9 507 tiYO b 1 6 „� ® �,� ® - , -��r 1U" ` �,� ,Y P 10''7 j% ° " -1) , !� ®® e�cr ear 12" JUNYPON i t'2/ 5` IINI_E I- p - E NL E T F JUNCTION BOX - -, - .'A m m ® - - -- _ -- - _�' p C� 10' SETBACK LINE p � • C. C. 0. � P.B. 38, PGS. 38 -39 Q 6h o• / �,r CONTROL \ 9 SEWER SO \ \�' "5'' , 52 L.F. SOCKED STRUCTURE I 1 PERF. 6" PVC U.D. JUNCTION _ r� I 4�% Pi \ q °� 1 BOX (BY�OTHERS) m g 6'x6 -b,& \ SANI ARY M ❑LE \11 ®■ ■ ■■ ■ ■s■ es ■ ■ 7. 4 1 0 ©C. WYE \ RIM IE_L.= 5. 5 HS -2 GR4T 6.65 Z.,P �� OVER LENGT OF I I 6 y r / p � > I UNDE DRAIN .. •' � \� ❑�❑ °' 06 Q1 - ,8� I MANHOLE I 9° C- w ? \�� NEW RETENTION VAULT II D. H. W. EL. 5.5 I I 7.3-+ +6.0 Ell F9 tj cNU z~ nOT. EL. 3.5 6 3 7 3 1�� . VOLUME PROVIDED Z v i r(1 p0 0 `v', I( 6 6 TRENCH DRAIN v, (/) �} ti 6.7 5 = 5, 600 C.F. I I NEW INLET + o a \ 2 z 0 (FOR OFF -SITE DRAINAGE) ®� -o p w r� t I ,� - I- I �� ' % a Q J I- iT, w W t D ;D H \ 6.55 II NEW NLET I � � � z W � � I� w ®�. 3 c� > w- n z a� �,�� 55 b� \ al C) - -• e� +7.55 \, ;�, - m n > � a L �4 JUNCTION BOX J I I `� Ivy , r - �. I -�� ©® ®m ®® m ®o ® ® ®m ®m =1 cm pj `w; ink I -� < 1 Ip_WAIK „ SPILLWAY O- - o �� �� ® 1 �� `X) CL `p 7 �9 36 W CM 1 .12'(M) -� ROOF DRA/N7 ®, ®m c� L ® ® ®® ® ® ®® �.'e\,� 16 0 ch c-7 11 © - - Mme" c� � � i ma AM ' ® �iY ® 1 ® 8" I i , ® ® • ® m ®. �. ® 72.94'<M> © fl o '•83.63'CM) ,_i \ \' S °tom ® w L1. 4' WALK r0 3.16 M) I ,._. , ® '\ CID Li a EX. 8" SAN. NEW 5' WALK N19 °30' M) N70 °29'56 "WCP &M) I In \ TO BE ABANDONED io" LOCK WALL \� CONIC, WALK rF 0 2" 0 i I d 0 m ® ®® CONI/EN/E IUC'E TORE z ADDRESS 11672 06 ® FIrJAL S10P" COMMERCIAL � �' DRAIAWGE 11U' o SIDEWALK EASEMENT TILE o g L O.R.B. 10971, PAGES 408 -410 0 8" c �j C-3 0 p a 0 -� 0� WPP D, ® m w fl n < p f3 � I 10' SETBACK LINE x --P.B. ,38, PGS. 38 -39 AND ASPHALT 1 ASPHALT 0' DRAINAGE, UTILITY & PARKING PARKING SIDEWALK EASEMENT b'' _ ® F O.R.B. 6958, PGS, 423- =124 _,_ ❑ II _- - - -_._ ® TRANSFORMER a- - EX, FHA - _- - - '�� ® 6.06 12^ PHONE BOX - EIHW - tlfi�Vt -- f3H�I -..- �9 \ El G n - Eli ice- - -- o -12 ` m`- �9r ' mt►p ea ®m+•am�amsn°ammm ~9 12' f mmm W,M, EX. SAN: --%- ^'7% � � ffi cm mim me MOO es� °9 p ® ® Iola- EX. 5' CONCRETE SIDEWALK tx 2 -__ ® ®; ®-a>a� �� 0 ra 6" WATER -- -- - --` q qa Imp ®mm -wmem em® tam® mmtmmme9® sn€a ®mm ®w ® ®� ® ®m�■am�pr�■VC ?�ITton ItK�ae�mmeomm m ® ®m mm ese®m ��amegra - �������_ - -_M 1 lJ I v l - =3+�j -- - - CHD. a60,01'(P &M) - - - \> 6 cP CB -173 8 ° &M W=w __ ___ v1 _._ _� t `- SANI'I SANITARY MANHOLE a IM S ULFVIE " B�ULE q ___ - - -- \ - -_ , "o SANITARY h1ANHOLE- \� sammenruc�c�usmagerem� ►■m ®m ®'asma 60 RIGFIT - OF-WAY _ \ RIM EL.= 6.28 ��; -- CP.B, 38, PGS, 38 -39) 3 6' ASPHALT PAVEMENT ®m ° ®� a m. _- ® ® ® ® ® ® ®me�®,mi ® ®uo ®, // m® ®mmmm ®mmmm+ma'r� ®'�,1° � _ •- .------ -_-_'___------ -.. "-- _ • - - - -- - ❑t+W - OH 2' C ❑NC, CURB & GUTTER EX, 12" RECLAIMED WATER ORIGINAL RECEIVED JAN 112006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER . 4.s EX. TREl L E-GEND 41-R-10" - R 1 U" DENOTES PALM TREE - SIZE INDICATED C) 10" DENOTES A PINE TREE - SIZE INDICATED -10" DENOTES AN OAI< TREE - SIZE INDICATED A TREE LABELED "TWIN" IS 2 TRUNKS MI- ASURED 4' ABOVE THE GROUND FROM 1 MAIN TRUNK, "TRIPLE" IS 3 TRUNKS MEASURED 4' ABOVE THE GROUND FROM I MAIN TRUNK 0 SCALE: 1 • 20 0 • .0 NES Comm.: 0534�] Drawn By: B.J.V. Checked By: H. G. Issue Date: 08/25/05 Revisions: No. Date Description _ 10106105 PER CITY 8 01/11/06 PER FIRE A -• I r Z\ Z\ i t 0 A A 0 0 4 THIS DRAWING IS AN INSTRUMENT OF SERVICE AND SHALL REMAINH�'� T�(�TY�(�E ENGINEER, AND SHALL NOT BE REPRODUCED, PUBLISHED COPOYRIGHf, .2 tS�41�• pYJ STIED • THE CONSENT OF THE ENGINEER. [� UU f °s' ♦ n � • 1 ft RAM A. WEL, Ph.D., P.E. #47434., - X11► c: COPIES OF THESE PLANS ARE NOT VALID IJIVL 5�• EMBOSSED WITH THE SIGNING ENGINEER'S S wy �- { 1` ,win _ t ,s I l s z i 1 r ' f s t t 1 � -• I r 3 i t wy �- { 1` ,win W Q ro p 1-1/2" TYPE 5 -3 2" ANCHOR SEE FDOT INDEX 201 FOR EYE BOLT AND CHAIN "C" 2' -0" x 3' -1" ` J JFDOT @S ,' PER FT. MIN. INLET DETAIL N.T.S. 2- 1/2 "x2 -1/2 "x1/2" ANGLE 4 "x3/8 "0 ANCHOR STUD GRATE FRAME W /STUD. STEEL FRAME W/2 ANCHOR STUDS PER SIDE - EQUAL CENTERS. GALVANIZE AFTER FABRICATION ANCHOR STANDARD DETAIL CAST IRON RETICULINE GRATE TRAFFIC TYPE (H -20 LOADING) W/2 SIDED GRATE SEAT 8" CONIC. WALL 4000 PSI @ 28 DAYS #4 X @12" O.C.E.W. NOTE: 1, CUT PIPE FLUSH w /INDDE FACE OF WALL. 2. MORTAR BOTTOM TO MATCH INVERT OF OUTFALL PIPE. N.T.S. 1-1/2" TYPE 5 -3 �� Q 1 (2" T PE -11/ IN R.O.W.) FIN, GROUND @S ,' PER FT. MIN. EXCEPT AS NOTED 2' LEVEL VEL SHOULDER VARIES (SEE PLAN) LDER SOD SLOPE 1/4" PER FOOT SOD 4.. •.• IIII =IIII. ,.,' , =III =III IIII =IIII— F.DO.T. C RTIFIEDE COMPACTED FILL OR COMPACTED TO UNDISTURBED SOIL 98% MAX. DENSITY NOTE: SUBBASE PROVIDE 1/4" STABILIZED CONTROL JOINTS 40 L.B.R. @ 4'0, C., 5' O.C., COMPACTED TO 8' O.C., OR 12' O.C. 98% MAX. DENSITY IN R.O.W. & DRIVEWAY , SECTION N.T.S. 8" CONC . ° OVERFLOW P > EL, 5.7 v SKIMMER ' TOP EL. 5.7 , BOT EL. 3,9 u 7” ORIFICE 10' EL. 4.21 1`R. INV. 2 BOTTOM , °• ELEV. 3.5 15' RCP .75 p 0. PROP, MH COVER NEENAH R- 1740 —B OVER CONTROL STRUCTURE EL. 6.6 D . D 8" CONC. SEE DETAIL FOR STRUCTURAL J REINFORCEMENT P s D o D .r e RETENTION VAULT N.T.S. ASPHALT ® 1/4" PER FT, MIN. EXCEPT AS NOTED ASPHALT PC -1 1/4" THICK LIMEROCK BASE F,D,O.T, CERTIFIED COMPACTED TO 98% AASHTO T -180 MAX. DENSITY SUBBASE COMPACTED TO 98% AASHTO T -180 MAX. DENSITY ON SITE PARKING & DRIVEWAY SECTION N.T.S. NEW BLDG. ROOF DRAIN MEDIUM BROOM �� Q 1 FINISH CONC. WALK FIN, GROUND FINISH GRADE TO ,' 1" BELOW ISHOU EDGE OF WALK 2' LEVEL VEL SHOULDER VARIES (SEE PLAN) LDER SOD SLOPE 1/4" PER FOOT SOD 4.. •.• IIII =IIII. ,.,' , =III =III IIII =IIII— 0 COMPACTED FILL OR ui UNDISTURBED SOIL FIRE LINE OR STORM NOTE: WHEN SIDEWALK IS PROVIDE 1/4" TO BE REMOVED & /OR CONTROL JOINTS NEW SIDEWALK IS TO @ 4'0, C., 5' O.C., BE ADDED, IT IS TO BE REMOVED TO THE 8' O.C., OR 12' O.C. NEAREST EXPANSION & 1/2" BITUMINOUS JOINT. EXPANSION JOINTS @ 40' O.C. FOR 4' o SIDEWALKS, 50' O.C. 6 "x6 ", 10 "x10" WWM FOR 5' OR GREATER. CONCRETE WALK DETAIL N.T,S. BY PLUMBING CONTRACTOR. 8" CONC . ° OVERFLOW P > EL, 5.7 v SKIMMER ' TOP EL. 5.7 , BOT EL. 3,9 u 7” ORIFICE 10' EL. 4.21 1`R. INV. 2 BOTTOM , °• ELEV. 3.5 15' RCP .75 p 0. PROP, MH COVER NEENAH R- 1740 —B OVER CONTROL STRUCTURE EL. 6.6 D . D 8" CONC. SEE DETAIL FOR STRUCTURAL J REINFORCEMENT P s D o D .r e RETENTION VAULT N.T.S. ASPHALT ® 1/4" PER FT, MIN. EXCEPT AS NOTED ASPHALT PC -1 1/4" THICK LIMEROCK BASE F,D,O.T, CERTIFIED COMPACTED TO 98% AASHTO T -180 MAX. DENSITY SUBBASE COMPACTED TO 98% AASHTO T -180 MAX. DENSITY ON SITE PARKING & DRIVEWAY SECTION N.T.S. NEW BLDG. ROOF DRAIN I ;fir; N NA �� Q 1 INLET I FIN, GROUND FIN. FL. ,' I I 5' UTILITY (i,e. SANITARY 1-1/2"R 0 EI BLUE SEWER, WATER SERVICE, 0 P/L ui r, 1/2 WIDE FIRE LINE OR STORM BACKGROUND SEE PLAN 9 3000 PSI CONIC, STRESSED CONC. SLAB DRAIN) BY SITE CONTRACTOR MEDIUM BROOM 0 I I H -20 LOADING TO 5' FROM BLDG, o FINISH CONC. WALK #3 @12 O.C. o BELOW PAVEMENT 6 "x6 ", 10 "x10" WWM UTILITY WITHIN 5' OF BLDG. SIGN SPECIFICATIONS ro BY PLUMBING CONTRACTOR. FIN, GRADE PRIOR FINAL CONNECTION BY PLUMBING SIGN CONTRACTOR UNLESS OTHERWISE 1. 18"x12" LOGO SIGN COORDINATED BY THE G.C. UTILITY CONNECTION AT ALL BUILDINGS N.T.S. WH EEL LSTOP EACH PARKING :....:: AMP RA SPACE SFIALL BE ]NC. WALK,*..,.;, CONSPICUOUSLY DOWN DOWN 1 STRIPED IN BLl E AND WHITE PAINT, AND SHALL BE POSTED r�,' ,i',,i" ,P {1 �•,<��';I. '' "a-' -i,'' •i7 !' ;,.t ^'':�In;�"j�r,�� IY.�r,��r,I;l , li,, "id' ' ';;li'i'„ i t':r. :4; ; {.' •,.r :;` $: t.' "' . :I•," a ;'- 5.'5'x ,4`,1 „° ' . AND MAINTAINED WITH A PERMANENT, ABOVE- .;I, i;IL '.•,i "i"q'�?. ;�,`r ,q ":';h��!,. ,i;�p.;' „'• -r,,' "4'P!'p Sf �':�',�;�_ ",`r4 \` ,.,,.; ,;.- :t GRADE SIGN BEARING l 's''_' ,''"' THE INTERNATIONAL p�l, :hi:Yu SYMBOL OF ACCESSIBILLITY ''5;1;1;, •s - .rl, ' "r.' - -�,, .,�': - .i , AND THE CAPTION 'ti„ '•rd��'' �'��`', .r.; ,,�. '.I ;; -I;, •;', .- ,.,;,��; • �'_',- "PARKING BY DISABLED ;.h.'4'' .'y.S•Ei,uJ _ ii °I,''i,; ,.;i ili:'.,, rn 4';'r�l ?' _ .'- 1pp,�,�ih. 'F,�=' ,�'ii?'. iffy;. '2 r,,,,,, I,.{ ;�, ;:,;,,_ _ PERMIT ONLY " s „�„ � , ,1'�•�::!?.li� ilf '•r�.,,. SUCH SIGNS SHALL NOT '' -•p ,. ?.P' ..�,a,Y 2�r�� �.j ;ai - -- i %`, .�;,,,. BE OBSCURED BY A HC 6„ 6" VEHICLE PARKED IN THE SYMBOL 1- -II- -I SPACE. ALL HANDICAPPED t -'1161 ? PARKING SPACES MUST W BE SIGNED & MARKED m Ei 3� �m '{ IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE STANDARDS 2~ 2 ADOPTED BY THE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND A.D.A. HANDICAP PARKING STRIPING DETAIL �r S MIN 46' PROP. MH COVER NEENAH R- 1740 -B OVER CONTROL STRUCTURE D.H.Wo EL. 5.i--'\,, • ° BOTTOM N 8” CONC. ELEV. 3.5 1.5' o... y • 1, 6" U.D. 2' CLEAR ' to ' INV. 2.75 p ' RETENTION VAULT SECTION A -A N.T.S. OPTIONAL POST POSITION > SILT FLOW IIII °IIII° I 1111F111I°IIII° SILT BARRIER DETAIL N.T.S. POST OPTIONS: 2 "x4" OR 2.5 "DIAM. WOOD; 1.33LBS. /FT. MIN, STEEL FILTER FABRIC IN CONFORMANCE WITH SEC. 985 F.D.O.T, SPECS. OR EQUAL EXIST. GROUND PRINCIPLE POST POSITION, CANTED 20' TOWARD FLOW FILTER FABRIC EXIST. GROUND NOTE: SILT FENCE SHALL NOT BE TRENCHED IN WHERE ADJACENT TO TREES DESIGNATED TO REMAIN. THE SILT FENCE MUST BE LACEMENT SECURED THROUGH OVER E THE LOWER LIP OF THE BARRICADE, I--- D D PLAN VIEW RETENTION VAULT N.T.S. FILTER MEDIUM (SEE SPECS.) 3" CONC. W 6" PVC PERF. r Fill ;2 PIPE W/ SOCK INV. ELEV. 2.25 3" MIN. LAYER 3/4" WASHED GRAVEL FILTER FABRIC W /PERMEABILITY COEF. OF 0,20 CM /SEC NOTE: NEITHER #57 ROCK NOR FILTER MEDIA SHALL BE COMPRISED OF LIMESTONE, LIMEROCK OR OTHER CALCIUM CARBONATE AGGREGATE. (SEE FILTER MEDIUM SPECIFICATIONS) UNDERDRAIN DETAIL PLACE SOD 1/2" BELOW PAVEMENT NEW ASPHALT FIN. GRADE PRIOR AND BASE TO SODDING POSITIVE DRAINAGE urns viimivan��� nn � irn�a COMPACTED GROUND PLACEMENT OF SOD AT PAVEMENT N.T.S. I ;fir; N NA �� Q 1 INLET I MANHOLE I L - - - -- - - - - - � D PLAN VIEW RETENTION VAULT N.T.S. FILTER MEDIUM (SEE SPECS.) 3" CONC. W 6" PVC PERF. r Fill ;2 PIPE W/ SOCK INV. ELEV. 2.25 3" MIN. LAYER 3/4" WASHED GRAVEL FILTER FABRIC W /PERMEABILITY COEF. OF 0,20 CM /SEC NOTE: NEITHER #57 ROCK NOR FILTER MEDIA SHALL BE COMPRISED OF LIMESTONE, LIMEROCK OR OTHER CALCIUM CARBONATE AGGREGATE. (SEE FILTER MEDIUM SPECIFICATIONS) UNDERDRAIN DETAIL PLACE SOD 1/2" BELOW PAVEMENT NEW ASPHALT FIN. GRADE PRIOR AND BASE TO SODDING POSITIVE DRAINAGE urns viimivan��� nn � irn�a COMPACTED GROUND PLACEMENT OF SOD AT PAVEMENT N.T.S. N.T.S. 1/5 X g 8" CONC. #5 02' -0" O.C. FINISH GRADE TO ?' #4 CONT. 4. 1 1 " BELOW 1-1/2"R 0 EI BLUE EDGE OF WALK 0 P/L ui r, 1/2 WIDE #4 HK, BAR BACKGROUND SEE PLAN 9 3000 PSI CONIC, STRESSED CONC. SLAB @ 3' -4" O.C. MEDIUM BROOM 0 H -20 LOADING PLACE SOD t /2" o FINISH CONC. WALK #3 @12 O.C. o BELOW PAVEMENT 6 "x6 ", 10 "x10" WWM 2" CLEAR SIGN SPECIFICATIONS ro #3 @10" O.C, FIN, GRADE PRIOR 12" SIGN EXPANSION JOINT 1. 18"x12" LOGO SIGN TO SODDING 1— 1/2" RADIUS NEW ASPHALT DISABLED' POSITIVE DRAINAGE (4:1 MAX) 2• 2 SIGN COMBINATION WHITE AND BASE 3000 PSI CONC, MEET EX. REFLECTIVE SHEETING BACKGROUND VERTICAL CURB PERMIT 8„ LETTERS UNTIL 7 DAYS AFTER 6„ PAVING 1/2" BLACK 3. LETTERS TO BE "C" SHALL BE PROVIDED BY PRECAST /SLAB BORDER 1" HIGH SERIES DETAIL RETENTION COMPACTED GROUND COMPACTED FILL IIII IIII ; BASE 1" ALUMINUM OR UNDISTURBED 1 5. POST TO BE MADE OF P/L SOIL III __ COMPACTED II I— SEE PLAN 1.5" (SEE DETAIL) ': IIIII SUBBASE 6. SIGNAGE PER A.D.A. PLACE SOD 1/2" 3,000 PSI — HANDICAP PARKING SIGN DETAIL NOTE: BELOW PAVEMENT CONCRETE IIII �--II ^_III PROVIDE 1/4" FIN. GRADE PRIOR I I I I CONTROL JOINTS AND BASEAL ' TO SODDING @ 4'O.C., 5' O.C., POSITIVE DRAINAGE (4:1 MAX) 8' O.C., OR 12' O.C. MEET EX. & 1/2" BITUMINOUS EXPANSION JOINTS @ 40' O.C. FOR 4' COMPACTED GROUND C SIDEWALKS, 50' O.C. GROUND TRANSITION FOR 5' OR GREATER. CURB /WALK DETAIL AT THE PROPERTY LINE N.T.S. N.T.S. 1/5 X g 8" CONC. #5 02' -0" O.C. ?' #4 CONT. 4. 1 FTP 25 1-1/2"R 0 EI BLUE 3 -1/2" BEARING 0 ui r, 1/2 WIDE #4 HK, BAR BACKGROUND 9 3000 PSI CONIC, STRESSED CONC. SLAB @ 3' -4" O.C. WHITE BORDER 0 H -20 LOADING 2" CLEAR o AND SYMBOL #3 @12 O.C. o 6 "x6 ", 10 "x10" WWM 2" CLEAR SIGN SPECIFICATIONS ro #3 @10" O.C, 12" SIGN POST DETAIL 1. 18"x12" LOGO SIGN PARKING BY 1. WALLS, FOOTING & DISABLED' 2• 2 SIGN COMBINATION WHITE 3000 PSI CONC, 1" SERIES "C" REFLECTIVE SHEETING BACKGROUND DO NOT BACKFILL PERMIT 8„ LETTERS UNTIL 7 DAYS AFTER ONLY TOPPING IS IN PLACE. 1/2" BLACK 3. LETTERS TO BE "C" SHALL BE PROVIDED BY PRECAST /SLAB BORDER 1" HIGH SERIES DETAIL RETENTION VAULT 1.5 4. SIGN TO BE MADE OF WHITE $255 FINE 1" ALUMINUM BACKGROUND `° 1 5. POST TO BE MADE OF F.S. 318.18 1 GALVANIZED STEEL 1.5" (SEE DETAIL) 3" 6" 3" 6. SIGNAGE PER A.D.A. FTP _ 55 REQUIREMENTS HANDICAP PARKING SIGN DETAIL N.T.S. SYMBOL SHALL BE 5 FT. HIGH & WHITE PAINT COLOR HANDICAPPED PAVEMENT SYMBOL N.T.S. N.T.S. N.T.S. G PLACE CONC, SLAB /WALK 4" BELOW FLOOR ELEV, EXCEPT AT DOORS REMAIN FLUSH. EXPANSION JOINT SLOPE AT 1/4" PER FOOT 10:1 MAX. SLOPE SOD NOTES: 1. PROVIDE 5'x5'x4" THICK CONC. SLAB 0 ALL EMERGENCY EXITS. 2. CONFORM TO ABOVE DETAIL FOR PLACING WALKS AT THE BLDGS. PLACEMENT OF CONCRETE SLAB AT ALL BUILDINGS N.T.S. EXIST. SURFACE SAW -CUT EXIST. EDGE OF PAVEMENT & BASE NEW SURFACE EXIST, BASE NEW BASE NEW SUBBASE PAVEMENT TRANSITION DETAIL N.T.S. N.T.S. FILL GROUND AROUND BLDG. TO 3" BELOW FIN, FLOOR ELEVATION & SOD MAX. SLOPE 4:1 MIN. SLOPE 2% GRADE M WATER MAIN OR STORM DRAIN GROUND PREPARATION AT ALL BUILDINGS 18" MIN. VERTICAL CLEARANCE N,T.S, �- — — ± — SAN. SEW. GRADE D z to' oM WATER MAIN OR STORM DRAIN D.I.P. IS USED IN PLACE OF P.V.C. FOR A MIN. OF 10' EACH WAY + FROM CL OF WATER MAIN WHEN GRADE THE VERTICAL CLEARANCE BETWEEN �\\� WATER & SEWER MAINS IS 18' OR LESS, 18" OR MORE VERTICAL CL. I Z WATER MAIN o - 10' MIN. P OR V.C.P. NOTE: HORIZONTAL CLEARANCE SEW NX SAN. SEWER GRAVITY MAIN + CONCRETE ENCASEMENT OF STORM SEWER SANITARY SEWER GRAVITY OR SAN. SEWER MAIN IS NOT PERMITTED. GRAVITY MAIN VERTICAL CLEARANCE HORIZONTAL CLEARANCE WATER MAIN & SANITARY SEWER CLEARANCES FAF40W BY DMARM PERW ONLY $256 FW F.& 31.18 °o GALVANIZED METAL o SIGN POST WITH 3/8" O ° HOLES S DRILLED S ON 1" CENTERS o o o FINISHED g GROUND 1/5 X g 8" CONC. #5 02' -0" O.C. #4 CONT. 4. 1 COLD JOINT 0 o 0 EI TOPPING 4000 PSI 3 -1/2" BEARING 0 ui 8" HOLLOW CORE PRE — #4 HK, BAR a o 9 3000 PSI CONIC, STRESSED CONC. SLAB @ 3' -4" O.C. o o ° 0 H -20 LOADING 2" CLEAR o - - #3 @12 O.C. o 6 "x6 ", 10 "x10" WWM 2" CLEAR #3 @10" O.C, 12" SIGN POST DETAIL NOTE: 1. WALLS, FOOTING & BOTTOM SLAB TO BE 3000 PSI CONC, DO NOT BACKFILL 8„ UNTIL 7 DAYS AFTER TOPPING IS IN PLACE. 2. STRUCTURAL DESIGN SHALL BE PROVIDED BY PRECAST /SLAB SUPPLIER. STRUCTURE DETAIL RETENTION VAULT EXIST. SURFACE SAW -CUT EXIST. EDGE OF PAVEMENT & BASE NEW SURFACE EXIST, BASE NEW BASE NEW SUBBASE PAVEMENT TRANSITION DETAIL N.T.S. N.T.S. FILL GROUND AROUND BLDG. TO 3" BELOW FIN, FLOOR ELEVATION & SOD MAX. SLOPE 4:1 MIN. SLOPE 2% GRADE M WATER MAIN OR STORM DRAIN GROUND PREPARATION AT ALL BUILDINGS 18" MIN. VERTICAL CLEARANCE N,T.S, �- — — ± — SAN. SEW. GRADE D z to' oM WATER MAIN OR STORM DRAIN D.I.P. IS USED IN PLACE OF P.V.C. FOR A MIN. OF 10' EACH WAY + FROM CL OF WATER MAIN WHEN GRADE THE VERTICAL CLEARANCE BETWEEN �\\� WATER & SEWER MAINS IS 18' OR LESS, 18" OR MORE VERTICAL CL. I Z WATER MAIN o - 10' MIN. P OR V.C.P. NOTE: HORIZONTAL CLEARANCE SEW NX SAN. SEWER GRAVITY MAIN + CONCRETE ENCASEMENT OF STORM SEWER SANITARY SEWER GRAVITY OR SAN. SEWER MAIN IS NOT PERMITTED. GRAVITY MAIN VERTICAL CLEARANCE HORIZONTAL CLEARANCE WATER MAIN & SANITARY SEWER CLEARANCES FAF40W BY DMARM PERW ONLY $256 FW F.& 31.18 °o GALVANIZED METAL o SIGN POST WITH 3/8" O ° HOLES S DRILLED S ON 1" CENTERS o o o FINISHED g GROUND Revisions: No, Date Description g 0 0 0 y 0 o 0 EI 1 DROP u , 0 ui a o 9 3000 PSI CONIC, 0 U o o ° 0 N U o - - o Q1 Z 12" SIGN POST DETAIL N.T.S. N.T.S. 2� PPS °�P� A\ P Q� ORIGINAL RECEIVED JAN 112006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER CURB FLUSH CURB FLUSH CURB RAMP DETAIL CURB N.T.S. (a® Issue Date: 06/13/05 Revisions: No, Date Description y 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Z THIS DRAWING IS AN INSTRUMENT OF SEj VII FE ANDS SS��II���.L REMAIN TyEf� �� RTY OF THE ENGINEER, AND SHALL NOT BE REPROD CFA, PUgLISHTD OR4Lf i , I \Y WITHOUT THE CONSENT OF THE ENGINEER. w (h, : ©Q�fQRii;liT 205 N�t UBLISHED RAM A. GOEL, Ph`D.', P:E�•#49434 • »' °�':����` COPIES OF THESE PLANS ARE °'N0� AL {t �9�;,.'' "' EMBOSSED WITH THE SIGNING E t88Rf?4i�.+1,��D''' IIC5.1, y i 1 1 IIC5.1, WPP - -- - L}I-I-W - - - O I FW -- - - C3i4W -- - . - - - - U.. - .. - - U H-'�J - - - - - W-- .. -. - • • - - .. EIH,%� .- - E�I ; W- - - Oi i W _ P - _ EH W- ..- L LTt-1 � _- _b!P P -- ] ® m9®®® m�® camlp (�l ®curmea ® ® ®m ®rmesa�a�+m9� as9s99m 6 r -k 61`- [f AI My ATER `I \ 1 � carte ®9y�t�or., mmm® m: f_ Ipa m WHOM M=M eat�t�a��+m®armaawaaesmt� SANITARY MANHOLE RIM EL.= 5.32 EX. LATERAL b • NORTHJ�A �_ A Y ®ULE - _ 60' RIGHT-01: -WAY EX:- �(af�J. -- Mt�NHO , C S �• - - - EX. SAN. MANHOLE ��y�; 90 (P,B, 38, PG S. 38 -39) S R =118 A= 43,74' - �- �) m tos RNV, U. ® r r® � ,' AS I.T VE n"T \ EX, 6" WATER CH 1'i — -{, WPP— —BHW— — —E[HW WPP _9 H*- — ---B Hid- — ----p H-bd -- — --Bf =1 W— — -$H W— — -8W W— — --BH W— — -&H W— ti. -$H W— — -BH W— — -BH W— — _BH W— — --EfHW_ —WPB — --BH v-- — - FOUND RR SPIKE SANITARY MANHOLE IN ASPHALT \ !Y RIM EL.= 5.32 BM No. 1 NORTH BAYWAY BOULEVARD \ _ _ - _ ah _ EL, , 01_____ UTILITY & —� Q 60' RIGHT - ❑F -WAY R =1 180, 00' A =43. 74' 4 5 DRAINAGE, \y ( P. B. 38, PGS. 38 -39) \ SIDEWALK EASEMENT \ 36' ASPHALT PAVEMENT CHD.= 43.74'(P &M 8 O. R. B. 6958, PGS. 423 -424, CB -S69° 15' 01 " EC P &M) © — 3 6 0 � � 820. 00' A =28 8' HD. = 04' (P &M) CB =S69° 54' 23' E( P INLET 13" r WPP �_� �ti WP WPP II WPP SABAL PALM Q 5' CONCRETE SIDE 'ALK ,t I LE — BHW--' — — SANITARY MANHOLE M 4•x4 5' ❑NCR E S I DEWA K BF M LIVE OAK y IR 1/2 (N❑ ID) rye` LK LIVE AK 1B 61 8 0. 0' RIM EL, = 5.07 LIVED 6" [ E DA 6" 16iiL1VE AK WPP — BEP M 10" 1 10" WLP — ` u �_ J, — X____ � )y_. -- LIVE OAK LIVE OAK 12° 10° NLET INLET — o GRA CONCRETE SWALE �� RANSF❑ ER — — -�-�� --- WEIR _ I SW ��___ 4 0 3 4 APRON CONC. CONC. J 4 3 29 9, HEADWALL HEADWALL I Q 10' SETBACK LINE 27.0 I 62 2' I — I � POINT OF BEGINNING P. B. 38, PGS. 38 -39 3 f, 62. 2' o O w N � 4 x 62. 2' _ Q 1G NORTHEAST CORNER ASPHALT " I LIVE OAK 5 4 2 1 O OF L ❑T 13, BLOCK B PARKING 3 5 I 5. 4 1 I _ B. 38, PGS. 38 -39 I O � z 1r SABAL ALM 4 I 5 4 20 3 ��Q 3 9 1" o ., 25, 0' -- �- PARKING EASEMENT I O SAE L LM U II R ANITARY MANH ❑LE n� R " IM EL. 5. 30 0- LIVL'"DAK'. B. 6835, PGS. 1731 -173 I 1 I 18 3 1 5 "��' (2) STORY C, B. S, LOT 12 ADDRESS #678D CONCRETE LOT 11 SABAL PAM i LOCK B x I (2) STORY C. B. S. LIVE OAK A LT PARKING LOT I BLOCK B I 3 I W ADDRESS #6781 W P $ G I d CONCRETE PARKING oo w O f- I. CONCRETE PARKING 1 0 I-- II r cu UNDER BUILDING �- C o> W? 3" � (. TENNIS COURTS W UNDER BUILDING p GARAGE EL. =6. 18 ao I TH 6' CHA I U Ui GARAGE EL. =6. 76 z I � LOT 10 (2) STORY C, B. S. I ❑NCR��� C) W DRAKE ELM I � ADDRESS #678C � z LINK FENCE o � � DR I AY r, BLOCK B I� CONCRETE PARKING o° I o LOT 13 I U 3 3 rn m TR PL LOT 9 UNDER BUILDING o x 16'VE OAK LOT 8 d I BLOCK B m rn � cu BLOCK B I GARAGE EL. =6. 72 `" II I 3O 1 BLOCK B CO Ul070� co �I I W 1 � II ;�co -03D z _j ENCROACHMENT EASEMENT 5, 4 I � I��e 3 (SABAL AL w II °`°, 0- I O. —R. B. 7173, PG�. 1896 -1899 PLANTER z O 3 I O 5. ,4 Q N W m z O o ul-' -0 DRf 5 — — 62. 2' — — '" — o x '_ II J z i � r PLANTER U O 1 _ M W C 1) STORY C. B. S. N 6„ I 1 (� I 62_2' — N w = z 1--1 Qoo w 70 COMMERCIAL o r+ KE ELM % CONCRETE d I 3 3 ~ II ¢ W Ld Q oM aa- Ul czi „ SWALE P�2K I NG EASEMENT I I I ,' Q I �� F- Fu A PHALT B. /6835, PITS. 1731 -1732 D QUEEN PALM 10 QUEEN N PALM — (UEE:1 PALM SWALE 1 0 a- 0, >- �-CL .J 8 ARK I NG SPILLWAY 5. 5 z �t - C ❑NCRETE SIDEWALK C ❑NC. 10' I I LIVE OAK ' U I '-' Q 3 _ O i� D L 0° 15' 05" W( C &M) 69. 44' ( C &M) ARAL P LM x FF�E IB 16, In 3 �M 0 0 SPA 12' LIVE AK SPKND 3 -4. 0'i FIR 5/6 ors FN/ N7 ° 29' S6" W< P& $" 185, 00' C P& > CONC. LB 6928 1 3� N7 ° 29' S6" WC P) '� 1' C P) < Np1'D)��Q II o� WASHINGTDNIA PALM GRASS POND N70 �2' 37" W( M) .'-G C M) B No, I 3 28 L -- BM No. 2 3 O °� UEEN PA EL. =6. 97 POOL -µ I 3 I 0. C C. I DRAINAGE CONC. BLOCK C ALL. II WALL C ❑NC, WALK CONC. 2 LOT 15 12' 17 I I 3 BLOCK B O I II DRAINAG i I O. R, B. 10971E PAGESE398 -400 ., Ln O ASPHALT COVERED v PARKING I C 1) STORY C. B. S. I O CONC. cu (l ) STORY C. B. S. I o II ADDRESS #696 QI I I ADDRESS 2 COMMERCIAL 5 26.1 10, COMMERCIAL I .-� II Ljj SIDEWALK EASEMEN Q PALM QUEEN PALM - I I R. B. 10971, PAGES 408 -41 s' O 18 a_ ASPHALT II N PARKING I n i ^ 3 `. 3 II r Boa O LOT 14 ( 30 LOT 19 I LOT 18 I LOT 17 I LOT 16 dv, �cz� BLOCK B I °� o BLOCK B BLOCK B BLOCK B BLOCK B m Q °NO ru c°u 3 II i I I N 10 II C7 � o A/C WPP �, a,r9 �� II 2 8' QU PALM QUEEN PALM 2 I II 10' SETBACK LINE I I BRICK P. B. 38, PGS, 38 -39 LW PAVERS I II I C ❑NC. � I 10' DRAINAGE, UTILITY & I ASPHALT I ^ 15. 0' 14. 3' p ASPHALT I II PARKING ASPHALT I WEE PAC ❑NC, 11 8 = PARKING I O. R. B SIDEWALK 6958, PGS, 4231 -424 I I � II 3 0 B" FCIR 1/2 " fV TRA�NSF012ME ° , OS W CHD. =87. 15, (M) LB 6168 I I I 2 3 2 Bit I CK_ — 45 ( P) --`- PAVERS -� PHONECBJN75 03 CHD. =87. - - — — — — — — — — — — — — Box CB= N74-56,39" W 2 6 L[VF WPP 12' 12: �4 9' CIR 5/8 WASHINGT AF 4R /s • 5' CONCRETE SIDEWALK LB 2129 5' CONCRE E SIDEWALK LB 889 ' CONC. I CURB & GUTTER -= l _ _ =2640. 00' A =60, O1' _ 3 - O 8 7 — HD. =60. O1' ( P &M) (n _ CB =N73° 20' 38 " -W( P &M) `D SANITARY MANH O LE SOUTH GULEV I EW BOULEVARD ---- J RIM EL.= 4.79 SANITARY MANHOLE 60' R HT - OF-WAY RIM EL. = 6. 28 < P. B. 3 PGS. 38 -39) 36' ASP LT PAVEMENT _ - -BHW -- CURB & GUTTER - _ -BHW -- WPP FND. " X" FND, " X" (NO ID) (N❑ ID) CUT IN CUT IN IDEWALK FIP 1/2 " SIDEWALK (NO ID) �N O 0 20 40 10 SYMBOL LEGEND 10" DENOTES PALM TREE - SIZE INDICATED p 10" DENOTES A PINE TREE - SIZE INDICATED 00 10" DENOTES AN OAK TREE - SIZE INDICATED 010" DENOTES AN ELM TREE - SIZE INDICATED A TREE LABELED "TWIN" IS 2 TRUNKS MEASURED 4' ABOVE THE GROUND FROM 1 MAIN TRUNK, "TRIPLE" IS 3 TRUNKS MEASURED 4' ABOVE THE GROUND FROM 1 MAIN TRUNK 136 4 TREE SURVEY RATING (1 -5) TREE SURVEY NUMBER ORIGINAL RECEIVED JAN 112006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER DEC 12 2005 Issue Date: 08/25/05 Revisions: No. Date 0 —Description f tai 0 0 0 0 r^+t I �r BUTLER'S NURSERY, INC 7011 75TH S7 N PINELLAS PARK FL. 33781 PH 727- 544 -0445, FAX: 727 -541 -5027, E -MAIL: BUTLERS NURSERYOMSN.COM DRAWN BY: RON BELKO CHECKED BY: CHUCK BUTLER CERTIFICATION # FL-1235A L2.1� '• I aZ/ ����� OCR. � tai r^+t I L2.1� '• I aZ/ ����� OCR. � SEC-rION 17, 71"OWNSHIP 29 SO-LT—CH, RANGE 15 1EAS7C, COUN -r Y, 1F11.0R11DA WPP WPP WPP � N, OHW--- ---- -- OHW OHW- - -OHW OHW OHW OHW OHW OHW OHW OHW OHW OHW OHW pH�! OHW Oy� �� 2j 2' CONC. GUTTER �� � ��? NIQ- G) FOUND RR SPIKE SANITARY MANHOLE IN ASPHALT 9 y� (o RIM EL.- 5.32 T B M No. 1 O NORTH BAYWAY BOULEVARD �`? ��` �"° z EL. =5.01 CO - —�- - O y� •- S 6 0' RIGHT - OF -WAY S - - - - - - - ' - 1 ---- -- `�' - - ---- -- - - 5' DRAINAGE, UTILITY & Oyu, \O (P.B. 38, PGS. 38 -39> �� CHD�43.74' (P &M) sow SIDEWALK EASEMENT 36 ASPHALT PAVEMENT Oyu O CB -S69° 15'01 "E(P &M) — -= Q.R.B. 6958, PGS.423 -424 ��` O� y� Oos fro �tX ob- D �. �j�' 0 l��� h�jD` �'�' ��' � h Dc � D` INLET �� h h4' `0 M R- 4820.00' A-28 �.( HD.- 289.04'(P &M) CB -S69° 54'23 "E(P &M) �� 13" wPP wPP wWF OHW . SANITARY MANHOLE W 0 5' CONCRETE SIDEWALK ,1 R /2" 40.0' RIM EL.= 5.07 M 4 "x4" 5' CONCRETE SIDEWALK WM h' 10 LB 61 8 11 O (N 6141 0 611 ©6•• — 6' [(j p��` WPP — — — — BFP��WM 10" - h' _��1Q" WLP _ — 12" —�,\ 1{��� 7�. (INLET -� O h INLET 0� �--- — —�-- o SWALE N TRANSFORMER —� SWALE —� WEIR h0 --�' o GRASS CONCRETE N CONC. N s APRON CONC. �o �o �o Y cv r0 O O O I HEADWALL HEADWALL N �� �j Q 29.9 68 I I POINT OF BEGINNING ' SETBACK LINE 27.0 _ _ rn 62.2 I _ 10 _ 62.2' o ,r rn 6 o IC NORTHEAST CORNER P.B. 38, PGS. 38-39 h/ I N x 62 2 _ OF LOT 13, BLOCK B / @ ti 2" U' P.B. 38, PGS. 38 -39 PARKING 6�3 5 5.4' 5.4 I 5.411- 20.1' z it g0 I loll a R t fll ' � ON �cP SANITARY MANHOLE 25.0 PARKING EASEMENT RIM EL.= 5.30 0 O.R.B. 6835, PGS. 1731 -1732 12 LOT 12 x I 181111 N 10 5" I (2) STORY C.B.S. (2) STORY C.B.S. 6 n ADDRESS 0678D CONCRETE LOT 11 BLOCK B ADDRESS 06788 �� O ASPHALT _ PARKING LOT BLOCK B `b - CONCRETE PARKING w 1w- CONCRETE PARKING I zll O N - PARKING UNDER BUILDING 00 w TENNIS COURTS x ao UNDER BUILDING I �o r s GARAGE EL. =6.18 L WITH 6' CHAIN v ►ri GARAGE EL. =6.76 O CONCRETE zCL a3 N. 8a LOT 10 00 (2) STORY C.B.S. z w � LINK FENCE DRIVEWAY 0 Q 3- M I BLOCK B � ADDRESS 678C 6 0 0 � w N T tPLE LOT 9 CONCRETE PARKING o 0 LOT 13 V v r,- m I UNDER BUILDING o x BLOCK B I 16" j M m N BLOCK B GARAGE EL. =6.72 11�, °c I °° SYMBOL LEGEND 10" DENOTES PALM TREE - SIZE INDICATED 0 1&" DENOTES A PINE TREE - SIZE INDICATED 0 10" DENOTES AN OAK TREE - SIZE INDICATED 10" DENOTES AN OAK TREE - SIZE INDICATED A TREE LABELED "TWIN" IS 2 TRUNKS MEASURED 4' ABOVE THE GROUND FROM 1 MAIN TRUNK, "TRIPLE" IS 3 TRUNKS MEASURED 4' ABOVE THE GROUND FROM 1 MAIN TRUNK LEGAL DESCRIPTION: A PARCEL OF LAND LYING IN SECTION 17, TOWNSHIP 29 SOUTH, RANGE 15 EAST, CITY OF CLEARWATER, PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA. BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: ALL OF LOTS 11, 12, 13, 9, 10, AND 15, BLOCK B, OF BAYSIDE SUBDIVISION No. 5, ACCORDING TO THE MAP OR PLAT THEREOF, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 38, PAGES 38 -39 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA. CONTAINING 47,588 SQUARE FEET, OR 1.0925 ACRES MORE LESS. nm� 0 I I 0 rnrn � NOTES: Ld TT22 � z x��e 121 1 {� AS >> I 1 . BEARINGS SHOWN HEREON ARE BASED ON THE EAST LINE OF BLOCK B, ACCORDING TO THE MAP OR Of > m _a ENCROACHMENT EASEMENT 5.4 v I 5.4' w I O� PLAT THEREOF, HAVING A BEARING OF SOUTH 19041'16" WEST. z can `�`�� Q- I O.R.B. 7173 PGS. 1896 -1899 - PLANTER z I - °- z 2. ELEVATIONS SHOWN HEREON ARE BAS z \ s - 0 ° o, (n 1- ' a, w ED ON (N.A.V.D.) NORTH AMERICAN VERTICAL DATUM OF1988. -° s� 62.2' PLANTER `W U x 1� 62 2 N w II Q Iz Qr� w 3. BENCHMARK _ PINELLAS COUNTY BENCHMARK MAP No. 155, BRASS DISK IN CONCRETE MEDIAN, �� 25.4 _ — — — — — F- _ �� > STAMPED LP-1-5, LAB -INS ELEVATION 4.19. _ q,.�.� 9 w ISM Q 4. THIS SURVEY WAS BASED ON THE TITLE COMMITMENT No. 40198026CA, DATED: FEBRUARY 24, 2004 52 � r� 6 e � e � �� x 1° u' 2 - 5.5 'J � �Q Q 0(n °- @ 8:00 A.M. PERFORMED BY COMMONWEALTH LAND TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY. THERE MAY BE n z w" � s8 CONCRETE o �. h \ I I Q> c� SWALE s s I X X X x� � 7..\ ° —° z }- 0 I- ASPHALT 5'" P RKING EASEMENT 3 D 10" YI-ANTLR SWALE 7 5 9 , o 0 ,I - w Q � w J ADDITIONAL RESTRICTIONS THAT ARE NOT SHOWN ON THIS SURVEY. ' / O.R. 6835, PGS. 1731 -1732 z °� c\I I U 5F- '59 T Q 5: ALL PROPERTY CORNERS ARE SET CAPPED (5/8 ") IRON ROD, LB 6928 UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. PARKING o° SPILLWAY 5.5 > CONC. 10' I 20" 8�� /4'CONCRETE SIDEWALK x 6 FLOOD ZONE INFORMATION: 15'05 "W(C &M) 69.44'(C &M) r` 0.8' r`' S "CLOVER w COMMUN I TY PANEL No.: 125096 0104 G 62.3' 2 SPA 12" A S� Y o m Q 0.8 --�2 �$ oo FLOOD ZONE: ZONE AE (EL . 1 1 ) 10 SPKND 3.3' 4.0' FIR 5 " - N70° 29'56 "W(P &M) 185.00'(P M) CONC. ^' N70° 29156 "W(P) 83.51'(P) (NO ID) e �I `- REVISED MAP DATE:- SEPTEMBER 03 . 2003 BF GRASS OND °„ LB 6928 0.3 N700 32'37 "W(M) 83.63'(M) LB 3889 I II TBM No. 2 — EL. =6.97 0.7' CONC. DRAINAGE CONC. POOL BOCK WALL A SURVEYORS NOTES: (TITLE COMMITMENT No. 40198026CA): WALL CONC. WALK CONC. I LOT 15 �0 12" II 9 I SCHEDULE B - SECTION 2 ^o� 1 BLOCK B ,., I •� ^ J ITEM No. 1: NO RESPONSE REQUIRED BY THE SURVEYOR. ^ DRAINAGE EASEMENT 09 e� CL I ss�l �G O.R.B. 10971, PAGES 398 -400 ITEM NO. 2: NO RESPONSE REQUIRED BY THE SURVEYOR. I v.. ITEM No. 3: ALL ENCROACHMENTS ARE SHOWN AND DIMENSIONED ON THE DRAWING. ASPHALT COVERED (1) STORY C.B.S. I �o I� QI ITEM No. 4: NO RESPONSE REQUIRED BY THE SURVEYOR. PARKING (1) STORY 0672. 261' ( CONC. 1- ADDRESS #696 o ITEM No. 5: NO RESPONSE REQUIRED BY THE SURVEYOR. ADDRESS 672 10" COMMERCIAL I I� � ITEM No. - 6:-NO RESPONSE REQUIRED BY THE SURVEYOR. COMMERCIAL 6� ITEM No. 7: A BLANKET 10 FOOT FLORIDA POWER CORPORATION EASEMENT LYING 5.0 FEET SIDEWALK EASEMENT 8„ CL ASPHALT � ON EACH SIDE OF THE- CENTERLINE OF ANY EXISTING SERVICES AS RECORDED IN O.R.B-. 5-026 O.R.B. 10971, PAGES 408 -410 '1 3 0- �- �� PARKING I Q PAGES 1738 -1739 PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA.. o M LOT 14 �° �-19 _� ( ITEM No. 8: INGRESS /EGRESS, PARKING AND PEDESTRIAN TRAFFIC EASEMENT AS SHOWN ON 8„ z z cV I — PO O LOTS 7,8,9,16,17 & 189 AS RECORDED IN O.R.B. 6958, PAGES 520 -526, PUBLIC RECORDS LOT 16 a r a(n s�C) 04 BLOCK B 't-►n cv OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA - LOT 18 LOT 17 v U, _T10X --1 ° G o I ITEM No. 9: PARKING EASEMENT AGREEMENT ALONG THE WEST 25 FEET OF LOT 9 LOT 19 BLOCK B 0 �,-�- C/);u N j I °'O' �` AND ALONG THE SOUTH 25 FEET OF LOTS 9 & 10, O.R.B. 6835 PAGES 1731-1732, PUBLIC BLOCK B BLOCK B BLOCK B `rnD, ��e ,-,n cn � r� � � a' C) (3 o A/C WPP (n ( �( RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA. C-4 11 mm* I ITEM No. 10:- THE NORTH. 5. -00- FEET OF LOTS 7 -13 AND THE SOUTH 10.00 FEET OF LOTS I „ � � QD 6 I 15 -20, BLOCK "B ", DRAINAGE , UTILITY AND SIDEWALK EASEMENT FOR THE CITY OF a 00(n 6 CLEARWATER, RECORDED IN O.R.B. 6958, PAGES 423 -424, PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS .. O COUNTY, FLORIDA. W K c� I ITEM No. 1 -1: ENCROACHMENT EASEMENT AS PRESENTLY EXISTS, ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF 10 SETBACK LINE N I PAVERS CONC. LOTS 9 & 10 O.R.B. 7173, PAGES 1896 -1899, PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA. P.B. 38, PGS. 38-39 ITEM No• 12: CROSS PARKING EASEMENT, NON- EXCLUSIVE EASEMENT, ON LOT 16, O.R.B. 11029, AND n 15.0 14.3 I �I I PAGES 763 -764, PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA. . LEGEND: 10' DRAINAGE, UTILITY & ASPHALT ``�` ASPHALT M I 0,0 ASPHALT SIDEWALK EASEMENT PARKING PARKING N CONC. O� PARKING — _ _ �) Q ITEM N -o. 13: DUMPSTER PAD EASEMENT LOCATED ON LOT 10, O.R.B. 11634, PAGES 1- 784- -1787, ® = DENOTES WOOD POWER POLE O.R.B. 6958, PGS.423 -424 z 8 _ -- FCIR %2" �� PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA. --� = DENOTES GUY WIRE &ANCHOR NTRANSFORME 03,08 „W CHD. =87 15�(M) LB 6168 ITEM No. 14: EASEMENT FOR MAINTENANCE OF CONCRETE DRAINAGE POND LOCATED ON A = DENOTES SET PARKER KALON NAIL & DISK 0 DENOTES SET CAPPED IRON ROD > BRICK- A6. 12"-'1` PHONE CB =N74�56'39'�W CHD.= 87.45'(P) OH OHW-'LOT •16, BLOCK B , O.R.B. 10971, PAGE 1784, PAGES 398 -407, PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA. _DENOTES EXISTING GROUND ELEVATIONS OI�AVERS 9 WPP I ��9 I ITEM No. 15: SIDEWALK EASEMENT LOCATED ON LOT 169 BLOCK "B ", O.R.B. 10971, PAGES 408 -410, FCM = FOUND CONCRETE MONUMENT `9 II PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA FIR = FOUND IRON ROD 12 `G 12" >k LB 2129 ITEM No. 16: PARKING AGREEMENT OF (8) PARKING SPACES CLOSES TO THE MOTELS FOR THEIR FCIR =FOUND CAPPED IRON ROD SIDEWALK FIP = FOUND IRON PIPE � FCIR 5 /e” 5' CONCRETE � USE, Q.R.B. 4382, PAGES 1044 -1046, PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA_ `L LB 3889 `L ITEM No, 17: NO RESPONSE REQUIRED BY THE SURVEYOR. FPIP = FOUND PINCHED IRON PIPE 5 CONCRE SIDEWALK h0 �o OS �� _ ITEM No. 18: NO RESPONSE REQUIRED BY THE SURVEYOR. R = RADIUS 2' CONC. CURB & GUTTER •9 •` A = ARC DISTANCE — = __�� -�- ITEM No. 19: NO RESPONSE REQUIRED BY THE SURVEYOR. CB = CHORD BEAR -I NG o `SS> R- 2640.00' A- 60.01' C - ITEM No. 20: NO RESPONSE REQUIRED BY THE SURVEYOR - D = DELTA > •61 68 0_ _ _ _-_ — CHD.- 60.01'(P &M) 01 _ ITEM No. 21: NO RESPONSE REQUIRED BY THE SURVEYOR. OHW = OVERHEAD WIRES A — CB -N73° 20'38 "W (P &M) � S _ A SANITARY MANHOLE ORB = OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK RIM EL.= 4.79 ITEM No. 22: NO RESPONSE REQUIRED BY THE SURVEYOR. ITEM No. 23: NO RESPONCE REQUIRED BY THE SURVEYOR. PB = PLAT BOOK SOUTH GULFVIEW BOULEVARD O� -- - - - Cps � � `S °'- ^ ITEM No. 24: NO RESPONSE REQUIRED BY THE SURVEYOR-. ORIGINAL PLAT — Os = O I TEM No. 25 : NO RESPONSE REQU I RED BY THE SURVEYOR. (M) = MEASURED - o - - O 4j (F) = FIELD j -_� \" 60' RIG T -OF -WAY O SANITARY MANHOLE O ITEM No. 26: NO RESPONSE REQUIRED BY THE SURVEYOR. A RIM EL.- 6.28 '� ITEM No. 27: NO RESPONSE REQUIRED BY THE SURVEYOR. % D a V (R) = RADIAL (P.B. 38, PGS. 38 -39) y`v `� ITEM No. 28: NO RESPONSE REQU -I RED BY THE SURVEYOR_ (C J = CALCULATED 36' ASPH LT PAVEMENT �''° X• (D) = DEED FND- =FOUND 1 0 - LLF.EL. = LOWEST LIVING FLOOR ELEVATION NO 00 0 20 40 �j MLP = METAL LIGHT POLE 10 SYMBOL LEGEND 10" DENOTES PALM TREE - SIZE INDICATED 0 1&" DENOTES A PINE TREE - SIZE INDICATED 0 10" DENOTES AN OAK TREE - SIZE INDICATED 10" DENOTES AN OAK TREE - SIZE INDICATED A TREE LABELED "TWIN" IS 2 TRUNKS MEASURED 4' ABOVE THE GROUND FROM 1 MAIN TRUNK, "TRIPLE" IS 3 TRUNKS MEASURED 4' ABOVE THE GROUND FROM 1 MAIN TRUNK LEGAL DESCRIPTION: A PARCEL OF LAND LYING IN SECTION 17, TOWNSHIP 29 SOUTH, RANGE 15 EAST, CITY OF CLEARWATER, PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA. BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: ALL OF LOTS 11, 12, 13, 9, 10, AND 15, BLOCK B, OF BAYSIDE SUBDIVISION No. 5, ACCORDING TO THE MAP OR PLAT THEREOF, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 38, PAGES 38 -39 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA. CONTAINING 47,588 SQUARE FEET, OR 1.0925 ACRES MORE LESS. nm� 0 I I 0 rnrn � NOTES: Ld TT22 � z x��e 121 1 {� AS >> I 1 . BEARINGS SHOWN HEREON ARE BASED ON THE EAST LINE OF BLOCK B, ACCORDING TO THE MAP OR Of > m _a ENCROACHMENT EASEMENT 5.4 v I 5.4' w I O� PLAT THEREOF, HAVING A BEARING OF SOUTH 19041'16" WEST. z can `�`�� Q- I O.R.B. 7173 PGS. 1896 -1899 - PLANTER z I - °- z 2. ELEVATIONS SHOWN HEREON ARE BAS z \ s - 0 ° o, (n 1- ' a, w ED ON (N.A.V.D.) NORTH AMERICAN VERTICAL DATUM OF1988. -° s� 62.2' PLANTER `W U x 1� 62 2 N w II Q Iz Qr� w 3. BENCHMARK _ PINELLAS COUNTY BENCHMARK MAP No. 155, BRASS DISK IN CONCRETE MEDIAN, �� 25.4 _ — — — — — F- _ �� > STAMPED LP-1-5, LAB -INS ELEVATION 4.19. _ q,.�.� 9 w ISM Q 4. THIS SURVEY WAS BASED ON THE TITLE COMMITMENT No. 40198026CA, DATED: FEBRUARY 24, 2004 52 � r� 6 e � e � �� x 1° u' 2 - 5.5 'J � �Q Q 0(n °- @ 8:00 A.M. PERFORMED BY COMMONWEALTH LAND TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY. THERE MAY BE n z w" � s8 CONCRETE o �. h \ I I Q> c� SWALE s s I X X X x� � 7..\ ° —° z }- 0 I- ASPHALT 5'" P RKING EASEMENT 3 D 10" YI-ANTLR SWALE 7 5 9 , o 0 ,I - w Q � w J ADDITIONAL RESTRICTIONS THAT ARE NOT SHOWN ON THIS SURVEY. ' / O.R. 6835, PGS. 1731 -1732 z °� c\I I U 5F- '59 T Q 5: ALL PROPERTY CORNERS ARE SET CAPPED (5/8 ") IRON ROD, LB 6928 UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. PARKING o° SPILLWAY 5.5 > CONC. 10' I 20" 8�� /4'CONCRETE SIDEWALK x 6 FLOOD ZONE INFORMATION: 15'05 "W(C &M) 69.44'(C &M) r` 0.8' r`' S "CLOVER w COMMUN I TY PANEL No.: 125096 0104 G 62.3' 2 SPA 12" A S� Y o m Q 0.8 --�2 �$ oo FLOOD ZONE: ZONE AE (EL . 1 1 ) 10 SPKND 3.3' 4.0' FIR 5 " - N70° 29'56 "W(P &M) 185.00'(P M) CONC. ^' N70° 29156 "W(P) 83.51'(P) (NO ID) e �I `- REVISED MAP DATE:- SEPTEMBER 03 . 2003 BF GRASS OND °„ LB 6928 0.3 N700 32'37 "W(M) 83.63'(M) LB 3889 I II TBM No. 2 — EL. =6.97 0.7' CONC. DRAINAGE CONC. POOL BOCK WALL A SURVEYORS NOTES: (TITLE COMMITMENT No. 40198026CA): WALL CONC. WALK CONC. I LOT 15 �0 12" II 9 I SCHEDULE B - SECTION 2 ^o� 1 BLOCK B ,., I •� ^ J ITEM No. 1: NO RESPONSE REQUIRED BY THE SURVEYOR. ^ DRAINAGE EASEMENT 09 e� CL I ss�l �G O.R.B. 10971, PAGES 398 -400 ITEM NO. 2: NO RESPONSE REQUIRED BY THE SURVEYOR. I v.. ITEM No. 3: ALL ENCROACHMENTS ARE SHOWN AND DIMENSIONED ON THE DRAWING. ASPHALT COVERED (1) STORY C.B.S. I �o I� QI ITEM No. 4: NO RESPONSE REQUIRED BY THE SURVEYOR. PARKING (1) STORY 0672. 261' ( CONC. 1- ADDRESS #696 o ITEM No. 5: NO RESPONSE REQUIRED BY THE SURVEYOR. ADDRESS 672 10" COMMERCIAL I I� � ITEM No. - 6:-NO RESPONSE REQUIRED BY THE SURVEYOR. COMMERCIAL 6� ITEM No. 7: A BLANKET 10 FOOT FLORIDA POWER CORPORATION EASEMENT LYING 5.0 FEET SIDEWALK EASEMENT 8„ CL ASPHALT � ON EACH SIDE OF THE- CENTERLINE OF ANY EXISTING SERVICES AS RECORDED IN O.R.B-. 5-026 O.R.B. 10971, PAGES 408 -410 '1 3 0- �- �� PARKING I Q PAGES 1738 -1739 PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA.. o M LOT 14 �° �-19 _� ( ITEM No. 8: INGRESS /EGRESS, PARKING AND PEDESTRIAN TRAFFIC EASEMENT AS SHOWN ON 8„ z z cV I — PO O LOTS 7,8,9,16,17 & 189 AS RECORDED IN O.R.B. 6958, PAGES 520 -526, PUBLIC RECORDS LOT 16 a r a(n s�C) 04 BLOCK B 't-►n cv OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA - LOT 18 LOT 17 v U, _T10X --1 ° G o I ITEM No. 9: PARKING EASEMENT AGREEMENT ALONG THE WEST 25 FEET OF LOT 9 LOT 19 BLOCK B 0 �,-�- C/);u N j I °'O' �` AND ALONG THE SOUTH 25 FEET OF LOTS 9 & 10, O.R.B. 6835 PAGES 1731-1732, PUBLIC BLOCK B BLOCK B BLOCK B `rnD, ��e ,-,n cn � r� � � a' C) (3 o A/C WPP (n ( �( RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA. C-4 11 mm* I ITEM No. 10:- THE NORTH. 5. -00- FEET OF LOTS 7 -13 AND THE SOUTH 10.00 FEET OF LOTS I „ � � QD 6 I 15 -20, BLOCK "B ", DRAINAGE , UTILITY AND SIDEWALK EASEMENT FOR THE CITY OF a 00(n 6 CLEARWATER, RECORDED IN O.R.B. 6958, PAGES 423 -424, PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS .. O COUNTY, FLORIDA. W K c� I ITEM No. 1 -1: ENCROACHMENT EASEMENT AS PRESENTLY EXISTS, ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF 10 SETBACK LINE N I PAVERS CONC. LOTS 9 & 10 O.R.B. 7173, PAGES 1896 -1899, PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA. P.B. 38, PGS. 38-39 ITEM No• 12: CROSS PARKING EASEMENT, NON- EXCLUSIVE EASEMENT, ON LOT 16, O.R.B. 11029, AND n 15.0 14.3 I �I I PAGES 763 -764, PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA. . LEGEND: 10' DRAINAGE, UTILITY & ASPHALT ``�` ASPHALT M I 0,0 ASPHALT SIDEWALK EASEMENT PARKING PARKING N CONC. O� PARKING — _ _ �) Q ITEM N -o. 13: DUMPSTER PAD EASEMENT LOCATED ON LOT 10, O.R.B. 11634, PAGES 1- 784- -1787, ® = DENOTES WOOD POWER POLE O.R.B. 6958, PGS.423 -424 z 8 _ -- FCIR %2" �� PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA. --� = DENOTES GUY WIRE &ANCHOR NTRANSFORME 03,08 „W CHD. =87 15�(M) LB 6168 ITEM No. 14: EASEMENT FOR MAINTENANCE OF CONCRETE DRAINAGE POND LOCATED ON A = DENOTES SET PARKER KALON NAIL & DISK 0 DENOTES SET CAPPED IRON ROD > BRICK- A6. 12"-'1` PHONE CB =N74�56'39'�W CHD.= 87.45'(P) OH OHW-'LOT •16, BLOCK B , O.R.B. 10971, PAGE 1784, PAGES 398 -407, PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA. _DENOTES EXISTING GROUND ELEVATIONS OI�AVERS 9 WPP I ��9 I ITEM No. 15: SIDEWALK EASEMENT LOCATED ON LOT 169 BLOCK "B ", O.R.B. 10971, PAGES 408 -410, FCM = FOUND CONCRETE MONUMENT `9 II PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA FIR = FOUND IRON ROD 12 `G 12" >k LB 2129 ITEM No. 16: PARKING AGREEMENT OF (8) PARKING SPACES CLOSES TO THE MOTELS FOR THEIR FCIR =FOUND CAPPED IRON ROD SIDEWALK FIP = FOUND IRON PIPE � FCIR 5 /e” 5' CONCRETE � USE, Q.R.B. 4382, PAGES 1044 -1046, PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA_ `L LB 3889 `L ITEM No, 17: NO RESPONSE REQUIRED BY THE SURVEYOR. FPIP = FOUND PINCHED IRON PIPE 5 CONCRE SIDEWALK h0 �o OS �� _ ITEM No. 18: NO RESPONSE REQUIRED BY THE SURVEYOR. R = RADIUS 2' CONC. CURB & GUTTER •9 •` A = ARC DISTANCE — = __�� -�- ITEM No. 19: NO RESPONSE REQUIRED BY THE SURVEYOR. CB = CHORD BEAR -I NG o `SS> R- 2640.00' A- 60.01' C - ITEM No. 20: NO RESPONSE REQUIRED BY THE SURVEYOR - D = DELTA > •61 68 0_ _ _ _-_ — CHD.- 60.01'(P &M) 01 _ ITEM No. 21: NO RESPONSE REQUIRED BY THE SURVEYOR. OHW = OVERHEAD WIRES A — CB -N73° 20'38 "W (P &M) � S _ A SANITARY MANHOLE ORB = OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK RIM EL.= 4.79 ITEM No. 22: NO RESPONSE REQUIRED BY THE SURVEYOR. ITEM No. 23: NO RESPONCE REQUIRED BY THE SURVEYOR. PB = PLAT BOOK SOUTH GULFVIEW BOULEVARD O� -- - - - Cps � � `S °'- ^ ITEM No. 24: NO RESPONSE REQUIRED BY THE SURVEYOR-. ORIGINAL PLAT — Os = O I TEM No. 25 : NO RESPONSE REQU I RED BY THE SURVEYOR. (M) = MEASURED - o - - O 4j (F) = FIELD j -_� \" 60' RIG T -OF -WAY O SANITARY MANHOLE O ITEM No. 26: NO RESPONSE REQUIRED BY THE SURVEYOR. A RIM EL.- 6.28 '� ITEM No. 27: NO RESPONSE REQUIRED BY THE SURVEYOR. % D a V (R) = RADIAL (P.B. 38, PGS. 38 -39) y`v `� ITEM No. 28: NO RESPONSE REQU -I RED BY THE SURVEYOR_ (C J = CALCULATED 36' ASPH LT PAVEMENT �''° X• (D) = DEED FND- =FOUND 1 LLF.EL. = LOWEST LIVING FLOOR ELEVATION 00 �j MLP = METAL LIGHT POLE WLP = WOOD LIGHT POLE 2' CONC. CURB & GUTTER WPP = WOOD POWER POLE WM = WATERMETER WV = WATER VALVE RM = RECLAIMED WATER FIP 112” BFP = BACKFLOW PREVENTER (NO ID) LP = LIGHT POLE ID = IDENTIFICATION SPKND = SET PARKER KALON NAIL & DISK FPKND = FOUND, PARKER KALON NAIL & DISK LB = LICENSED BUSINESS CONC. = CONCRETE C�EARWk�FR R SOR"' ° BE �-� 08/09/05 5 REVISED CERTIFICATIONS BAK 07/26/05 4 REVISED BOUNDARY & LEGAL PER CLIENTS REQUEST BAK 06/23/05 3 REVISED BOUNDARY & LEGAL PER CLIENTS REQUEST BAK FOR: R O G E R S BEACH DEVELOPMENT P.O.-BOX 6 7 6 CRYSTAL BEACH, FLORIDA 34681 06/06/05 2 ADDED TOPO ELEVATIONS AND ADDITION TOPO WORK TO SURVEY BAK 09/15/04 -1 REVE -I W TITLE WORK AND ADD TO SURVEY BAK DATE: No: REVISIONS BY: ITEM No. 29: NO RESPONSE REQUIRED BY THE SURVEYOR. OHW OHW -------- -i „ „ I TEM No. 30: NO RESPONSE REQUIRED BY THE SURVEYOR. A4!S 2 5 2005 _- -- -OHW FND.,. X ITEM No. 31: NO RESPONSE REQU I RED BY THE SURVEYOR. WPP (NO ID) ITEM No. 32: NO RESPONSE REQUIRED BY THE SURVEYOR. FND. "X" CUT IN ITEM No. 33: NO RESPONSE REQUIRED BY THE SURVEYOR. PLANNING &DEVELOt',,,jFNYrSVCS (NO ID) IDEWALK "rYOFi�tisrlit:f� _ CUT IN ITEM No. 34: NO RESPONSE REQUIRED BY THE SURVEYOR. SIDEWALK ITEM No. 35: NO RESPONSE REQUIRED BY THE SURVEYOR. CERTIFIED TO: ITEM No. 36: NO RESPONSE REQUIRED BY THE SURVEYOR-. ITEM No. 37: AS SHOWN ON THE DRAWING AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 38, PAGES 38 -39 OF THE SKTEL, INC. PUBLIC RECORDS, PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA. FIFTH THIRD BANK ITEM No. 38: NO RESPONSE REQUIRE BY THE SURVEYOR. COMMONWEALTH LAND TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY ITEM No. 39: NO RESPONSE REQUIRED BY THE SURVEYOR. ITEM No. 40: NO RESPONSE REQUIRED ,H E SURVEYOR. SHUMAKER, LOOP & KENDRICK, LLP° J EEIN S JL AUB SUR �Y E 1L ING9 INC. 7 �� � I � � � � � �. A I� SCALE: FIELg9125. , , ,. • . f, 111=201 B/99152A PROFESSIONAL SURVEYORS AND MAPPERS r:� LAS � T , t;t D WOR • °•��,i5. 2005 DRAWN BY: PAGES: 801 6 OLD COUNTY ROAD No. 54 °�° ®� ®������ BAK 1- 6/44 -46 "? 07/26/05 CHECKED BY: NEW PORT R I CHEY , FLORIDA 34653 KRUCE x':ItcI" :. 1. TC OFFICE: 727-834-8140 FAX: 727-834-8150 LORI ,a" RD s';yEr�p3'k� s tti�pp I3 JOB No.: SHEET No. L B 6928 NOT VALID A FD ;C N$EO SyRORTIp MAPPER ED SEAL 030155.2 1 OF 1 a`4 m 4 PROPERTY LINE —f i 31_11 1 1 I p � I I I I I i I 1 I 21, � o lo' -o" I I _o I OO I 1 2N 1 i I I i L_4 r— I I I I 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 I I UP 2 0 O 0 1 0 0 a- i 11 o 2 1'-0" 2 I'-0" 201 -011 I 201 -011 I OK'itchenette rh 1'-0' 9..a. p.o. q�_o. r -o 21,8. 47 TYPICAL EMPLOYEE AND OV KNIGHT LA ACCOnODATION PARKING SERVICE COURT 1-011 t=om 12'-0 ACCE51 &liY I 111_�_ROUTE 9 RE'141TAL OFFICES (2,500 s.f.) ;7- ----------- w—M ---------- --- RTY LINE � Trash 3 - 3'X 3' RECYCLE PADS CLUB HOUSE m ac 0 Lu 0 a a ut It I v LJJ w flee up TEIE /DATA Mall o O AD WALKWAY TO BUILDING "A" SEE SITE PLAN 0 FOR CONTINUATION , 2�`-O'I 2�'-0 29 I-On , o ROUTE FOR OVERNIGHT ACCOM 5' -4" 8 6' -9° 12' -0" 9' -0" 2 I u I 1 I 0 I e t 8� _5' CONCRETE SIDEWALK -� 1' -0'1 1'_011 01_011 0 I_()11 -O" QI- OFFICE O 21_ 11 01_011 �1 -011 9'_011 O� 9'_011 9'_011 1'-01 II-011 1_011 RENTAL OFFICES 0 0 9' -C I 0 I O 1_011 II_0 q1 -011 '1 BLDG. MlAlkix'T. --------------------- o �1­­ - - - - - - V -O" C) `I G R 0 U 1) i—LOOR PLAN Plan North SCALE: 1/8 " =1' -O" i °C) rr a 0 Ind CD 6 Sri 4 O Co 0 O SEE SHEET A -01.1A FOR CONTINUATION OF PLAN U I � � I , � I , I � I I , I � , 1 Lam. - - -- i---- - - - --L f]� ORIGINAL RECEIVED JAN 2 5 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT C {TY OF CLEARWATER WZ0 0 -d.0 ®w © omen ; ---- �wo I p � -7-Men ' M __ -- �' \,, C 0 klx'D 0 o w �U � CONCIERGE OFFICE O 21_ 11 01_011 �1 -011 9'_011 O� 9'_011 9'_011 1'-01 II-011 1_011 RENTAL OFFICES 0 0 9' -C I 0 I O 1_011 II_0 q1 -011 '1 BLDG. MlAlkix'T. --------------------- o �1­­ - - - - - - V -O" C) `I G R 0 U 1) i—LOOR PLAN Plan North SCALE: 1/8 " =1' -O" i °C) rr a 0 Ind CD 6 Sri 4 O Co 0 O SEE SHEET A -01.1A FOR CONTINUATION OF PLAN U I � � I , � I , I � I I , I � , 1 Lam. - - -- i---- - - - --L f]� ORIGINAL RECEIVED JAN 2 5 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT C {TY OF CLEARWATER WZ0 0 -d.0 ®w © ®� �wo 13MM 9% � O yea o w �U � O 000 LL N N U- N u_ N Z S 0 U �W < W 0 cn 1= 0 Q in U u- o � Q s w04wWWW w DW�W C5 _ N TIq .T- M -12 W Q D LO U O Ln O ;2; w O z -4a O z z O Ln 00000 5RF AV M H Ul _1c II.NOV.05 1 FE11F 0 < Q� U- z 73 .� vU 000E In] 0 Z 0 04 -208 a W A-01.1 FLOOR PLAN : IST FLOOR, EXTENDED PARKING DECK mkllap� SCALP: 1/8"=I'-O" Plan North MPSTER ENCLOSURE, E SITE PLAN FOR CATION r > I- 1i I . -1 > i ORIGINAL RECEIVED JAN 112006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER i, c c tjc c s �n • v� W rn � co 83 1-t CD C U s ' E--4 N e! 3 Q' 13 PQ zd i i - m 1] M 0 J ' P4 © � 5 f 0 CD U N lid i mm i oaa IF m z O W O z FW- M1 aoaa F S LA H L IC ooao 0 Q3 M-6 to U } v QC T— U �ooaFF1 0 z U 04 --208 1 d W -01.IA x ,� 8 0 0 o 6 I O I O O L c1l 91-0. 91-0. 91-0. I 91-0N 91-0" 91-00 O O -T- 7- TI ;b O 5 � 3 0 0 o --------------------- I I I ® I ..... ....... . L U rW 17`71 LJ LJ Ll 1-u 121-0 91-0. 121-01 k � I - TYPICAL Cie Q0 I-- uj 2 Lu Trash < Lu Lu BALCONY DOWN UP FITNESS CtNTER REST ROOMS < OPEN TO LOBBY BELOW - no co --------------------------------------- 1-01 A. -0. TYPICAL . . . O O ML T-- eL n. 1= 2nd LOu Plan North SCALE: 1/8"=I'—O" TOTAL PARKING: 35 SPACES I ===* O 7 UP EQ�Uf�P1��ENT (Generator $ Fire Pumps) tuj o cp c) CD CD Z ®�,W =13 U9 CC! c3 g cn Ffl g3 cq C-) r=4 o 04 13 �g 1C6 0 �E� �� r.T S 0 cn �2 A HA O CIL c a aaa [a C, r1i LJ Z 0 uj cc rlmslice' IL < w- ORIGINAL RECEIVED JAN 112006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER MINNIE I o � u- vo UJ Cie 2!E LOBBY 2 U DOWN UP FITNESS CtNTER REST ROOMS < OPEN TO LOBBY BELOW - no co --------------------------------------- 1-01 A. -0. TYPICAL . . . O O ML T-- eL n. 1= 2nd LOu Plan North SCALE: 1/8"=I'—O" TOTAL PARKING: 35 SPACES I ===* O 7 UP EQ�Uf�P1��ENT (Generator $ Fire Pumps) tuj o cp c) CD CD Z ®�,W =13 U9 CC! c3 g cn Ffl g3 cq C-) r=4 o 04 13 �g 1C6 0 �E� �� r.T S 0 cn �2 A HA O CIL c a aaa [a C, r1i LJ Z 0 uj cc rlmslice' IL < w- ORIGINAL RECEIVED JAN 112006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER MINNIE I o � u- 2!E 2 U z q) 5: < IL IV to W u- oaaaa l lu 0 04-208 A -01.2 0 0 0 -3 0 291-011 33' -4n -1) !� I mi LINE OF PARKING EASE�1M BELOW OF PARKING I FLOOR PLAN 2ND FLOOR, EXTENDED PARKING DECK 44445 SCALP: 1/8"=I'-O" Plan North ORIGINAL RECEIVED JAN 112006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER g cn -:4 uj moo CD CD IF ff- W313 14 V. Owl 0 E V1143 92 rZ4 g3 E- 13 r., 0 0 �� J-1 cc D D oFF-- 11 a F111 11: 1 z 0 W O z ------------- LU FE11 [3 0 F E-: 11 FE- 11 F z S R F AV MH O o�aoo O # Q3 i 97 73 U) z !> 1- L to (L QLOD I— a13 F w 0 04 -208 w A -01.2A 0 o i Q c� c� o i o FLOOR PLAIN & 3rd UNIT4193.........2631 UNITu2 .............2189 UNITtt4d6..........212_ UNITttS .............J925 Plan North OR SCALE: IX-4-0' sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. ORIGINAL RECEIVED JAN 112006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER rC W 93 T Lo -4 IS Zz� 13 1304 W 0 13NM goo U ANN ❑ ❑ ❑❑ ca r i i LJ Z 0 ui ui 0 j ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑o1 z F 5 SRF , W Ail l W,A 171 H uj II.NOV.05 Fill ❑ ❑ 11 Fill ❑ E— O U- (A) > E q) 0- 00 q) LL -,20 ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑❑ ci z tu 0 04-208 c; z W A -41.3 3: Cn o Bo Q Q o i o 0 UNIT410 .......... 2631 sq.ft. UN1748 ............. 2184 sq.ft. UNIT410fl2 .......... 212 3 sq. ft. UNIT411 .............. 1925 sq.ft. ORIGINAL RECEIVED JAN 112006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER `u c c c a �t u a °u t- u p'/1 • V �( w cn m co o � Z ^ I 13 E3 13 © Gars W W 0z i V ©,U'. O C 10 V i w � n H [Now a [aoa m z 0 W cc W ° U 0 FII M SRF ° AV MH o li.NOV.05 11-:11 FE-11 In [a Fil 00 Lo -� �- Q3 �o m c v ooa Fri] in Z 04 -208 c; zz lu A N 01 FLOOR PL,��I nth FLOOR Plan North UNIT413flS .......... 2631 sq.ft. UNIT414 ............. 2184 sq.fc. UNIT4108 .......... 2121 sq. ft. UNITUll .............. 1925 sq.ft. ORIGINAL RECEIVED JAI 112006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER �d d w °o N w w� F-- �4j O CD Q O F- O U co T/ 1 • V co `° co CID o U 1� � I e -i 13 rn ® y ^ 2 0 Q V� \) V �qw ao w 0 O ��w F U � O 0F] 0[UF0]FD-1 m Z a W W ° 1[-: aoaFl-:11 SRF ° AV MH o ll.NOV.05 FE ooaa o� �o n- 0q) w cri a L. �, QLao �U U- oaoao e z U 0 04 -2®8 0 w — ®1.5 0 0 0 Q Ee -- t 1110FAIm ,, t Plan North SCALE: I/8' =1' -0' UNIT # 19 t 20 ..........3012 sq.ft. UNIT # 22a (Lower Floor) ........... 1919 sq.ft. UNIT tt 21a fi 23a (Lower Floor) ........... 2111 sq.ft. UNIT # 22b (Upper Floor) ........... 1919 sq.ft. UNIT # 21b 6 23b(Upper Floor) ................. 822 sq.ft. Totdi ............ 3838 sq.ft. Total ..............3539 sq.ft. ORIGINAL RECEIVED JAN 112006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER R' n C LL a LL cc a LL H a r- C a Mr LL LL H S C i/ • v o� co cc �O U © © 1304 V 6 o � V1 pia �E �w o C13� a [Now.si a aaa m ri .Z 0 W 0 Z W H O a aaaa F sRIF Av MH a ITNOV.05 [Ell aaaa o u- �o m�- z v tQ 5v FF-T M °z t-- a 04 -208 d c; A N (D i UNIT tt 22b (Upper Floor) ........... 1919 sq.ft. UNIT tt 22a (Lower Floor) ........... 1919 so. ft. Total ............ 3838 sq.ft. UNIT tt 21b d 23b (Upper Floor) ........... 822 sq.ft. UNIT tt 24a fl 25a (Lower Floor) ........... 3855 sq.ft. UNIT tt 26a d 21a (Lower Floor) ........... MS sq.ft. ORIGINAL RECEIVED JAN 112006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER oar 0 LO 0 g CU Z H w w F- e co co O H S r V C �/ 1 • V W m "n L "o o O U rk. a ° G' W ®� �wv V1 W ©Ho 1 log P4 0 W o �aw ® H U P�9 � [Now FE-011 a In] a 0 m ri LJ z 0 W K d z W F- C FI:aaaa SRF AV MH o ITNOY.05 [1—: 11 [Ell Fill I[:]] Fi: 11 o� o �o r z v� In O � ao � >L F[--]] Fill 11-:11 F171 zz E- 0 04 -208 o. d x N UNIT tt 24a 8 2 Floor) ........... 3855 sq.ft. UNIT # 29b 8 256 (Upper Floor) ........... 2823 sq.ft. Total ............ 608 sq.ft. UNIT 4 26a $ 21d (Lower Floor) ........... 1100 sq.ft. UNIT tt 26b fl 21b (Upper Floor) ........... 2338 sq.ft. Total ............ 4038 sq.ft. ORIGINAL RECEIVED FEB 08 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER 010miniml Z 0 W oo ©oo SRF MH L F- I1.NOV.05 NIHISINI 0 0 41 z J AC O J u- 0 Q� �m- I mi =u �v U v N� � ca v �U HiMmimi z U�j 04 -208 Z W A X ca . DWLE R AS S 0 ARCHITECT ii 1 I I s •� � �T iwd mim E) 101' -3 1/2" (Top of Pent ouse Roof ) (Roof Level) 94' -1 1/2" ABOVE GR. FL. (89' -9" BFE) (UPPER ROOF LEVEL) �.� } IIRME■FOFOF0= (LOWER ROOF LEVEL) ir -� D C A A g (Top of Penthouse Roof) 101' -3 1/2" 101' -3 1/2" (Top of Penthouse Roof ) (Roof Level) (Roof Level) CV N covered Upper deck railing /parapet T I- T Lower deck railing/parapet " U er deck railing/ parapet 94 -I I/2 AB VE GR. FL. (89 -9 BFE) 94 -I I/2 ABOVE GR. FL. (89 -9 BFE) PP 9 � (Parapet) (Parapet) ITnTitm Lower deck railing /parapet -�_ (UPPER ROOF LEVEL) (UPPER ROOF LEVEL) `" —_ / 9 gin mv (LOWER ROOF LEVEL) (LOWER ROOF LEVEL) 1 1 - ��j I +65' -1 1/2" 7th Floor a +54' -11 1/2" 6th Floor +44' -31/2" 5th Floor +33' -1 1/2" IOU 4th Floor +22' -II I/2" 3rd. floor +13' -3 1/2" 2nd Floor (Park. floor) BFE: 11.0' ±0' -0" (BFE 6.0) Gr. floor — — - ����� E31111 131111 ION1► I1►1I► 4I►. " 0�IFAI1 @41 =•�I► � ��„II 1�� ► I ON ,�► u_�_� 1111 11►/1►/1►/1►/11 Ill�llllhlV�j I , I�'" I ....... (1 ► nue3 -�.� A -.-... OEM Ins 1111 ii :: (iiii III — — - -- - - -- ---- n i,_ i ❑_�_ 1 I!ii1►i1►�1►!I� 11►'I'•'1► I -�i� I,,;II II.,II :� �I► 1 �� �� ii ii 1�� 1 ■ ■■ I mumm iiii — — — — - - -- - -- inn ►3un ��_� ij►/j //1►/i►ili 101-1111 11NO, 1111 ii ■■ 1.�� 1..■ ii ii►/1►/1►ij�li il►•!I_.�I ►.�C► -!III II,,,II 1;;�,►11 :J Il►�ii ■■ ■■ - - II / /I / /11 I / /► / / /I //1 11111111111 I.... ■■ ►�►� ■ — Hill �■ pip EAST NOTE: ALL HVAC EQUIPMENT 15 LOCATED ON ROOF SCALE: 1/8' =1' -0' 11 C D r-covered ■ ■ 11 11 ILL[ - ■■ ■■ .1 '� ■■ ■■ !I■ ■III■ ■I ■ ■.1 �1'dll so M1111" ... . Ilm'! 8th Floor 8th Floor 11 ■■ 11 F717iini ■■! iiii ■ ■ ■1 �' II EN +65' -1 1/2" ith Floor 0 +54' -II 1/2" 6th Floor 0 +44' -3 1/2" 5th Floor 0 +33' -1 1/2" 4th Floor _ +22' -II 1/2" 3rd. floor a- +13' -3 1/2" 2nd F oor (Park. floor) BFE: 11.0' '�. ±0' -0" (BFE 6.61') Gr. floor :: ORIGINAL RECEIVED JUN 02 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER E il■i:i =iii 11►�i►/►'�i►i► 1064,►_/i ■. r■ l 1 ILI NOR ►/1►'�I►/1►I►�►�i►/►�ll ►�►�1►/I►/►�►�►�I - It - -- _- 2nd Floor (Park. floor) 1 • i/ ■ ice° floor - - - - --- — — — --- — --- — — — - - s� ■ 1■� --- �■ -- - COPYRIGHT FOWLER ASSOCIATES ARCHITECTS, INC. 2005 STEPHEN R, FOWLER AR0005441 Ell 111MM FOWLER ASSOCIATES FE—] Imm ARCHITECTS, INC. FE—:]] ® 1421 COURT STREET ® CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 ®(72 ® 7)449 -2021 ® FAX(727)447 -5339 FEI STATE OF FLORIDA ARCHITECTURAL LICENSE NUMBER e�R- 0005441 CERTIFICATE OF CORPORATE AUTHORIZATION NULABER ® AAC001665 a I WEST SIDE ELEVATION NOTE: ALL HYAC EQUIPMENT 15 LOCATED ON ROOF DATE N0. I REVISION BY ❑ 4.00T.05 I REV. FOR DRC COMMENTS SRF 9.DEC.05 2 DELETED I PARKING SPACE SRF ❑ S.JAN.05 3 REV. GR. FLR. PARKING MH II.APR.04 4 REV. UPPER FLOORS AV ❑ (1TH,8TH ( ROOF LEV.) 24.MAY.06 5 ADDED DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE SRF ❑ DATE DRAWN SRF I.Sept.05 AV MH ❑ ELEVATIONS F111 FF-] Flag-a del S ❑ 08 S. Gulfvlew Blvd. ❑ Clearwater Beach, Florida �a I PROJECT NO. SHEET NO. 104-208 A -2.2 11 IN I�II�1 l� w7F0� �_� �_� - - -_ ._ -� IIIII // ►11//I/1 =_= ■ . � . maws aw a_ y -a_ � � ►►i►�'►� ►��►1 = 1►/' ►III I1/, /III 11►1,1�II II►1Z11 I. , - -,. —�. - -,. 1 ►11►� �►11 FAR 02��I ►11 ►11►1 .- -- 7mm _m_ ilml_ Imm 7mml� 7100117210 From, 111,,: 01M B1 //l /�� // / / ►� 1111 ::loll Ill::: :loll ...... ..... .... lllf..• II II � II II II II ,ZII F1111 III1111►,,il_ Ili,, 111111111111111111111 ;,,,iil ❑� =- �_j_ = 1 �.� =.1 - I,IIIIIIII IIIIIII IIIIIIII,ii_ Iii:Ilil III IIIIII> III NOMINEE I Oros ■� ■� _ :: ■■ �I■II 11 ■IIIII ■ ■II ::! Ili►_�iil�►_"I gy"Jim ii►ili►�iiii►_�l�►_�iil►�i eaiiii - - ill ii ■■ ii !:: i■ ■ ■■ ii �� ME o �� 1 INS ❑ ❑n.❑ n� u�lc� E3uu ._.. � =IIIIIIII 111111 ..: ..: IIIIIIIII I III 1111111 1011 IIIII In ;I I EFf, i; ,I 1 I1 ►/ I � IIi►�IIi ►dill►�iilli►�ili►�ill ���I;,111111111111111111111111 ,,;I II :11111111111111111 OF51 �������:: �� �� :. F1111 11111111111 I IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII;,iil ❑_ 1124,107 .Ifl1115if ►_�illll_ ►. 111111 ►/IIIi�►_�►IIII��IIIi►�iill ��❑ 11" �' �11111111111IIIIIIIII ,II�,IIIIIIIIIIIII - ►- �►- �►-�► -� 1111111 I► /I► /I / /I / /II II / /1 / /.= I� �I�I�I I / /I //l 1 0�n 1 MAN logo III 11� III III �� 111111 111111 �� I 11 MINION Ma m IF O-UT ELL\/ATION F: ALL HVAC EQUIPMENT 15 LOCATED ON -•• • ASSOCIATES ARCHITECTS, INC. 2005 STEPHEN R, FOWLER AR0005441 DATE NO. REVISION BY FOWLER ASSOCIATES • 101 • , I� ■ �I ©I Em ❑ I® 0 M•. 1- _ .., - - - 4. C _ - -- +2�' -0 1/2" fn. clg. +18' -0 1/4" 3rd floor 2nd floor 11.0' • �__ I • BUILDING "A" NORTH ELEVATION V \, It 110 \111, xll/ mm I �ww m °' z t�O rkk L-J w� o 0 r FE 11 FE-11 3�� ,. mB& u- tf) s ®II® v v `v N ®III®® v ®III® 0 BUILDING "A" WEST ELEVATION +2�'-0 1/2 ►► fn. clg. +18' -0 1/4" 3rd floor + II -1111 2nd floor B1=1_ 11.0' t2�' -0 1/2" fn. Gig. +18' -0 BUILDING "A ": EAST ELEVATION i I �' 1I I BUILDING"A" SOUTH ELEVATION ORIGINAL SCALE: 1/4 = P -0" RECEIVED v- CD 0 0 C O u- 03 ►f) X O u.. I— JAN ? 5 200 pIp,NNING DEPAR11�!►EP CITY Of CLEPA14AjF:i Vst r , NCO LO CO WZ `r/ 4 O U I �ww m °' z t�O rkk L-J w� o 0 .-r �' 1I I BUILDING"A" SOUTH ELEVATION ORIGINAL SCALE: 1/4 = P -0" RECEIVED v- CD 0 0 C O u- 03 ►f) X O u.. I— JAN ? 5 200 pIp,NNING DEPAR11�!►EP CITY Of CLEPA14AjF:i Vst r , NCO LO CO WZ `r/ 4 O U I �ww m °' z t�O rkk O w� o 0 .-r FE 11 FE-11 3�� ,. mB& u- tf) s z v v `v N w cc v 0 -n d z - � o Ln oaoac1 3 0 / ° i� 1 Z w I- 0 FFaaoF 0 w L LL LLI C� U Fol [a [a [E-11 [E-11 z O4 -2®8 w d w A - ®2 Iw T x w S]EO7CION 17, 70WNS]H❑ P 29 SOU7]H[, R.,kNGH 15 HALS7C, P11-,TIE]L]LALS COTJN7CY, FEOIE ID k Ln rt 0 a cl wPP OHW OHW OHW OHW OHW LO OHW OHW OHW Ln -11 0L,. -,a 2' CONC. GUTTER 'S- �P ° O CD l7 - • • INLET --O ' K LINE 27.0 pro O� 5' DRAINAGE, UTILITY & SIDEWALK EASEMENT O.R.B._ 6958, PGS.423 -424 5' CONCRETE SIDEWALK 6® O6' 611 N — GRASS wPP OHW OHW 0 NORTH BAYWAY BOULEVARD _ - p `�S„ 60' RIGHT -OF -WAY S OHW OHW OHW R- 1180.00' A- 43.74' 0 OHW WPP- --- -OH W ----- � 4 `< FOUND RR SPIKE SANITARY MANHOLE IN ASPHALT RIM EL.- 5.32 TBM No. 1 lb Z EL. =5.01 .0 S 0 20 40 .: .. \�, O (P.B. 38, PGS. 38 -39) �� CHD. -43 74'(P &M) 6' S 10 py� 36' ASPHALT PAVEMENT py LEGAL DESCRIPTION 5' � O O � � tK A PARCEL OF LAND LYING IN SECTION 17, TOWNSHIP 29 SOUT, RANGE 15 EAST, CITY OF CLEARWATER, PINELLAS INLET • Z �, COUNTY, FLORIDA. BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: R- 4820.00' A -28 0 T1311 CHD.- 289.04'(P &M) CB -S69° 54'23 "E(P &M) (� wPP wP,FS wPP t` OHW q' `OO SANITARY MANHOLE A PORTION OF LOTS 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 15„ 16 AND 17, BLOCK B OF BAYSIDE SUBDIVISION No. 5, ACCORDING TO THE s WM O,y 5' CONCRETE SIDEWALK 10" `� /2" RIM EL.- 5.07 VAP- OR PLAT THEREOF, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 38, PAGES 3 -& -30 OF� THE PUBLIC- RECORDS -OF -PINELLAS LB s1 8 40.0' COUNTY, FLORIDA. BEING FURTHER DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: WPP BF P l yyM 10" 10" 1 INLET —5 — WLP — 12" ��- 10" �ro`L S { BEGINNING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT 13, BLOCK B; THENCE SOUTH 19° 41'160 WEST ALONG THE T 00 — — — — 0 — — `o' - A EASTERLY LINE OF SAID- LOT 13, BLOCK B-, A DISTANCE OF 117.2(} FEET; THENCE NORTH 70 29 56 W ES=T, A CONCRETE ° SWALE c TRANSFORMER ' SWALE � WEIR - DISTANCE OF 83.51 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 210 22'30" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 124.00 FEET TO A POINT ON THE APRON CONC. CONC. rp ro ro cV _j ARC 'OF CIRCULAR CURVE CONCAVE TO THE NORTHEAST, HAVING A RADIUS OF 2640.00 FEET; THENCE ALONG r� O I HEADWALL HEADWALL N `�� r� Q THE ARC OF SAID CURVE TO THE RIGHT, AN ARC DISTANCE OF 60.01 FEET, A CHORD BEARING AND DISTANCE 11111 29.9 F 6e S POINT OF BEGINNING OF NORTH 73 20 38 WEST, A DISTANCE OF 60.01 FEET, TO A POINT ON A NON- RADIAL LINE; THENCE NORTH I 10 SETBAC o 62.2 - G w NORTHEAST CORNER 20° 37'52" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 118.13 FEET; THENCE NORTH 70° 29'56" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 85.26 FEET; 62.2 I x 62.2' °? `o o IG ° ° P.B. 38, PGS. 38 -39 40 e c�i � OF LOT 13, BLOCK B THENCE NORTH 19 30-04" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 16.30 FEET; THENCE NORTH 70 2915611 WEST, A DISTANCE OF ASPHALT I r 12" P.B. 38, PGS. 38 -39 99.70 FEET; THENCE NORTH 180 22'31" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 113.66 FEET TO A POINT ON THE ARC OF A s 3 5 5.4' S 4 I 5.4' 20.1' v +� �O CIRCULAR CURVE CONCAVE TO THE SOUTHWEST, HAVING A RADIUS OF 4820.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTHEAST, PARKING I III ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE TO RIGHT, HAVING AN ARC DISTANCE OF 289.08 FEET, A CHORD BEARING F x �� 10 ) I _ �� ., �cP SANITARY MANHOLE AND DISTANCE OF SOUTH 690 54'23" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 289.04 FEET TO THE POINT OF REVERSE CURVATURE OF A CIRCULAR CURVE CONCAVE TO THE NORTHEAST , ' HAVING A RADIUS OF 1180.00 FEET' RIM EL.= 5.30 25.0' PARKING EASEMENT 12, f 18" on THENCE SOUTHEAST, ALONG THE ARC OF SAID THE ARC OF SAID CURVE TO THE LEFT, HAVING AN .� 0_R.B_ 6838, PCS_ 1731 -1732 LOT 12 1 k X ti �� d, ARC DISTANCE OF 43.74 FEET, A CHORD- BEARING AND- DISTANCE OF SOUTH 63°-15'01" EAST, A ct°o 5" I (2) STORY C.B.S. LOT 11 BLOCK B (2) STORY C.B.S. 6'� O = DISTANCE OF 43.74 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. ADDRESS #678D CONCRETE ADDRESS #678B SI w II O ASPHALT _ CONCRETE PARKING _ PARKING LOT BLOCK B w ' � _ CONCRETE PARKING w z{! `b CONTAINING 47,595 SQUARE FEET, OR 1.0926 ACRES MORE OR LESS. f PARKING DER BUILDING °�°� w x TENNIS COURTS x � °a UNDER BUILDING � l �� 1a �S, { s a `n GARAGE EL. =6.18 v WITH 6' CHAIN z GARAGE EL. =6.76 DR V WAY zo a_ "No e oo (2) STORY C.B.S. r- 3 o z w I (6 ADDRESS #678C zo LINK FENCE p - cc LOT 10 CONCRETE PARKING o 0 x LOT 13 o BLOCK B 16 It cu- -vim T IPLEr LOT 9k BLOCK B UNDER BUILDING �� �M LOT 8 0-) o � N � BLOCK B GARAGE EL. =6.72 6 I I Y if rnrn AS NOTES: BLOCK B Oo rn m ° w l w x J cn { 12" {� '�s, 1. BEARINGS SHOWN HEREON ARE BASED ON THE EAST. LINE OF BLOCK B,_ .ACCORDING. TO THE, MAP OR. cW„� -A0 V_ z w �e ,� i m-L -� z -0 g rn e ENCROACHMENT EASEMENT 5.4' 0 5.4' o �O PLAT THEREOF, HAVING A BEARING OF SOUTH 19041'16" WEST. rn z W s� a I O.R.B. 7173 PGS. 1896 -1899 - PLANTER z - - j -, z 2. ELEVATIONS SHOWN HEREON ARE BASED ON (N. A. V. D.) NORTH AMERICAN VERTICAL DATUM OF 1 988 . Uzi n 69> PLANTER x 10 N Gj� II Q z >- r°'0 3. BENCHMARK - PINELLAS COUNTY BENCHMARK MAP No. 155, BRASS DISK IN CONCRETE MEDIAN, > 25.4 — 62'2 62.2' w = w �= Q ' w STAMPED LP -15 , LAB -INS _ELEVATION- = 4. 13.- (1) STORY C.B.S. 10 S — 2 20.15 w `� U) w (air d 4. THIS SURVEY WAS BASED ON THE TITLE COMMITMENT No. 40198026CA, DATED: FEBRUARY 24, 2004 COMMERCIAL N n z � 6 6g� ss CONCRETE � a 8:00 A.M. PERFORMED BY COMMONWEALTH LAND TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY. THERE MAY BE 8 (• x h -� 5.5 I Q Q o Ui o SWALE s I I x _XX� o z rn ASPHALT �RKING EASEMENT s3 I D X 10 "� , l LANTER O SWALE S 5.9 _ n w �n J ADDITIONAL RESTRICTIONS THAT ARE NOT SHOWN ON THIS SURVEY. - 0_R. 6835, PGS_ 173.1- 17.32 , z ti S �j � °.i S 8 Q = Q 5 . ALL PROPERTY CORNERS -_ ARE SET CAPPED (5/a") IRON ROD, LB_ 6.928. UNLESS_ OTHERWISE-NO-TED. "P'ARKINIG p�/ SPILLWAY •5 10 co �9 � �. ��� Chop = �. _ _ CONC. �. — lb X20, S fir- 6. FLOOD ZONE INFORMATION: N/D ' — ' �� 2.3' 0.8' m L 6928 2 SPA 12" 16 w 4 coNC. N70 29 56 W(M) 99.70 (M) SIDEWALK Sc SCIR 5 "CLOVER ® S o m Q COMMUNITY PANEL No.: 125096 0104 G 7.50 GRASS /$ > >�s { 00 � FLOOD ZONE: ZONE AE (EL . 1 1 ) I�k70° 29'5 & 'W 85-44' CONC. o°o' 3 3' 4.0' FIR 5 " N70° 29'56 "W 99.55' REVISED MAP DATE.: SEPTEMBER 03 , 200 �" SN /D � � 0.3' N70° 29'56 "W(P) 83.5TrCP�3 (NO ID) ��e � �. FN /D ¢ �g 6928 °? N70° 29'56 "W(M) 85.26 ( OND N70° 32'37 "W(M) 83.63 (M) LB 3889 16.30 (M) SN /D I 11 TBM No. 2 N190 30'04 "E(M) I — — — — LB 6928 EL. =8.9 -7 k DRAINAGE � POOL 0.7' CONC. �I 0.7 CONC BLOCK WALL Tt SURVEYORS NOTES: (TITLE COMMITMENT No. 40198026CA) : WALL CONC. WALK CONC. CONC. LOT 15 >0 12" BLOCK B I{ SCHERULE B - SECTION 2: DRAINAGE EASEMENT 6,%° I S�I ITEM, No. 1: NO RESPONSE REQUIRED BY THE SURVEYOR. O.R.B. 10971, PAGES 398 -400 n© I ITEM- No. 2: NO RESPONSE REQUIRED BY THE SURVEYOR. �_- ITEM -No. 3: ALL ENCROACHMENTS ARE SHOWN AND DIMENSIONED ON THE DRAWING. ASPHALT ( - COVERED (1) STQRY C.B.S. co (� z� I ITEM No. 4: NO RESPONSE REQUIRED BY THE SURVEYOR. PARKING (1) STORY C.B.S. C. ADDRESS #696 ° I ITEM No. 5: NO RESPONSE REQUIRED BY THE SURVEYOR. ADDRESS #672 6�� 26'1 COMMERCIAL I Il Ld ITEM No. 6: NO RESPONSE REQUIRED BY THE SURVEYOR. COMMERCIAL SIDEWALK EASEMENT ITEM No. 7: A BLANKET 10 FOOT FLORIDA POWER CORPORATION EASEMENT LYING 5.0 FEET 8" o_ ASPHALT ON EACH SIDE OF THE CENTERLINE OF ANY EXISTING SERVICES AS RECORDED IN O.R.B. 5026, O:R.B.- 10971, PAGES 408 -410 '! 3 �'� PARKING �?9, < PAGES 1738 -1739 PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA. % ITEM No. 8: INGRESS /EGRESS, PARKING AND PEDESTRIAN TRAFFIC EASEMENT AS SHOWN ON w Do !� LOT 14 I °jn �f - I LOTS 7,8,9,16,17 & 18, AS RECORDED IN O.R.B. 6958, PAGES 520 -526, PUBLIC RECORDS LOT 16 8" r- ao� n C4 BLOCK B d N OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA. ITEM No. 9: PARKING EASEMENT AGREEMENT ALONG THE WEST 25 FEET OF LOT 9 LOT 18 N AND ALONG THE SOUTH 25 FEET OF LOTS 9 & 10, O.R.B. 6835, PAGES 1731 -1732, PUBLIC LOT 19 LOT 17 BLOCK B i n ° rn o °' °' BLOCK B BLOCK B BLOCK B ago l ��e a, r5�� o A/C PP rn �� RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA. L �rn #n - I (I ITEM No. 10: THE NORTH 5.00 FEET OF LOTS 7 -13 AND THE SOUTH 10.00 FEET OF LOTS a � �� 6 { 15 -20, BLOCK "B", DRAINAGE, UTILITY AND SIDEWALK EASEMENT FOR THE CITY OF 6 CLEARWATER, RECORDED IN O.R.B. 6958, PAGES 423 424, PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS Lu 6 I COUNTY, FLORIDA. Z� I BRICK Oro ITEM No. 11: ENCROACHMENT EASEMENT AS PRESENTLY EXISTS, ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF 10'SETBACK LINE LO PAVERS LOTS 9 &10 O.R.B. 7173, PAGES 1896 -1899, PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA. P.B. 38, PGS. 38 -39 r- CONC. rO 4 I II ITEM No. 12: CROSS PARKING EASEMENT, NON- EXCLUSIVE EASEMENT, ON LOT 16, O.R.B. 11029, M 15.0' 14.3 P I { PAGES 763 -764, PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA. . LEGEND: 10' DRAINAGE, & ASPHALT .�'`�` ASPHALT N I ? 11.8' c�°'� PARKING A ITEM No. 13: DUMPSTER PAD EASEMENT LOCATED ON LOT 10, O.R.B. 11634, PAGES 1784 -1787, SIDEWALK EASEMENT PARKING PARKING z 8„ CONC. `�' I � Ik "Sj PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA. ® = DENOTES WOOD POWER POLE O.R.B. 6958, PGS.423 -424 6' FCIR /p � = DENOTES GUY WIRE &ANCHOR � --- � ITEM No. 14: EASEMENT FOR MAINTENANCE OF CONCRETE DRAINAGE POND LOCATED ON e = DENOTES SET PARKER KALON NAIL & DISK NTRANSFORME ,� CHD. °87.15 LM) LB 6168 " 0 = DENOTES SET CAPPED IRON ROD > BRICK_ — HONE C6 °N750 03 08 W CHD• =87'45 (P) OHW�- LOT 16, BLOCK B O.R.B. 10971 , PAGE 1784, PAGES 398 -407, PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS = DENOTES EXISTING GROUND ELEVATIONS — — -�- — PAVERS 606 z 121* OX CB -974 56'39 "W OH � COUNTY. FLORIDA. ,� _ _ _ _ _ _ j{ I ITEM No. 15: SIDEWALK EASEMENT LOCATED ON LOT 16, BLOCK "B", O.R.B. 10971, PAGES 408 -410, FCM =FOUND CONCRETE MONUMENT WPP II `9 PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA. 12" FCIR 5 /a" ITEM No. 16: PARKING AGREEMENT OF (8) PARKING SPACES CLOSES TO THE MOTELS FOR THEIR FIR = FOUND IRON ROD 12„ FCIR = FOUND CAPPED IRON ROD 4� FCIR 5 /a" 5' CONCRETE SIDEWALK LB 2129 >� USE, O.R.B. .4382, PAGES 1044 -1046+ PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA. FPIP = = FOUND FOUND IRON PDPIRON PIPE 5' CONCRETE SIDEWALK rod rod LB 3889 •O ® O`L ITEM No. 17: NO RESPONSE REQUIRED BY THE SURVEYOR. S - _`_ - ITEM No. 18: NO RESPONSE REQUIRED BY THE SURVEYOR. R = RADIUS 2'CONC.CURB & GUTTER -` ITEM No. 19: NO RESPONSE REQUIRED BY THE SURVEYOR. A = ARC DISTANCE w S = _ _= ---'� CB = CHORD BEARING o SJ R- 2640.00' A- 60.01' ITEM No. 20: NO RESPONSE REQUIRED BY THE SURVEYOR. D =DELTA > 6 --- CHD.- 60.01'(P &M) cn - ITEM No. 21: NO RESPONSE REQUIRED BY THE SURVEYOR. OHW = OVERHEAD WIRES S —� _ CB -N73 ° 20'38 'W P &M) y SANITARY MANHOLE ORB = OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK �� ��,— - �` -j RIM EL.= 4.79 ITEM No. 22: NO RESPONSE REQUIRED BY THE SURVEYOR. SOUTH GUL�'V���l BOULEVARD s ITEM No. 23: NO RESPONCE REQUIRED BY THE SURVEYOR. PG =PAGE _ - - ITEM No. 24: NO RESPONSE REQUIRED BY THE SURVEYOR. Pa = PLkT BOOK S� (P) = PLAT - - - 06 = O ITEM No. 25: NO RESPONSE REQUIRED BY THE SURVEYOR. (M) = MEASURED - - - �' - - SANITARY MANHOLE ° `'� ITEM No. 26: NO RESPONSE REQUIRED BY THE SURVEYOR. `� O (F) = FIELD S �st 60' RIG T -OF -WAY O RIM EL.= 6.28 ITEM No. 27: NO RESPONSE REQUIRED BY THE SURVEYOR. (R) = RADIAL (P.B. 38, PGS. 38 -39) o�`L `� ITEM No. 28: NO RESPONSE REQUIRED BY THE SURVEYOR. (C>- = CALCULATED 36' ASPH T PAVEMENT �"a Dc O ITEM No. 29: NO RESPONSE REQUIRED BY THE SURVEYOR. (D) =DEED � O `L h' _ ---- -- FND = FOUND h� ro°' `o h' OHW OHW ITEM No. 30: NO RESPONSE REQUIRED BY THE SURVEYOR. LLF•EL. = LOWEST LIVING FLOOR ELEVATION `�' `° FND. "X" ITEM No. 31: NO RESPONSE REQUIRED BY THE SURVEYOR. MLP = METAL LIGHT POLE SYMBOL LEGEND wPP „ „ (NO ID) ITEM No. 32: NO RESPONSE REQUIRED BY THE SURVEYOR. WLP' = WOOD LIGHT POLE 2` CONC. CURB 8c GUTTER FND' X CUT IN ITEM No. 33: NO RESPONSE REQUIRED BY THE SURVEYOR. WPP = WOOD POWER POLE y 10" DENOTES PALM TREE – SIZE INDICATED (NO ID) IDEWALK ITEM No. 34: NO RESPONSE REQUIRED BY THE SURVEYOR. WM = WATERMETER CUT IN WV = WATER VALVE U 10" DENOTES A PINE TREE - SIZE INDICATED SIDEWALK ITEM No. 35: NO RESPONSE REQUIRED BY THE SURVEYOR. RM = RECLAIMED WATER FIP I/2" 10" DENOTES AN OAK TREE - SIZE INDICATED ITEM No. 36: NO RESPONSE REQUIRED BY THE SURVEYOR. BFP = BACKFLOW PREVENTER CERTIFIED TO: (NO ID) ITEM No. 37: AS SHOWN ON THE DRAWING AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 38, PAGES 38 -39 OF THE LP = LIGHT POLE 10" DENOTES AN OAK TREE - SIZE INDICATED FLORIDA . ID = IDENTIFICATION SKTEL, INC. PUBLIC RECORDS, PINELLAS COUNTY, A TREE LABELED TWIN ,� IS 2 TRUNKS MEASURED ITEM No. 38: NO RESPONSE RE(�✓�t'", BY THE SURVEYOR. SPKND = SET PARKER KALON NAIL &DISK FIFTH THIRD BANK Y THE SURVEYOR. FPKND = FOUND PARKER KALON NAIL & DISK 4 ABOVE. THE GROUND FROM 1 MAIN TRUNK, ITEM No. 39: NO RESPONSE RE(1' LB = LICENSED BUSINESS "TRIPLE" IS 3 TRUNKS MEASURED 4' ABOVE THE COMMONWEALTH LAND TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY ITEM No. 40: NO RESPONSE REQUIRE`; THE SURVEYOR. CONC. = CONCRETE GROUND FROM 1 MAIN TRUNK SHUMAKER, LOOP & KENDRICK, LLP , 10/31/05 6 REVISED BOUNDARY PER CLIENT REQUEST BAK SCALE: FIELD BOOK: 08/09/05 5 REVISED CERTIFICATIONS I F I CATIONS BAK c�EE.e.RWA�]�R BENCH I ESO -R-r KEEIN 8E S -rAUB STJRVI � YING9 INC. LA S'.iD�T;�t�. • �b�� LY 25� zQQS 1 " =20' 90125�/�1�2A PROFESSIONAL SURVEYORS AND MAPPERS �, ' $V DRAWN BY: PAGES: y''` ° r. 07/26/05 4 REVISED BOUNDARY &LEGAL PER CLIENTS REQUEST BAK (P]L�Y�i D]�i ][e S®][•s) '�?f� ,.��� 1Sxi '� �� - r BAK 1- 6/44 -46 06/23/05 3 REVISED BOUNDARY & LEGAL PER CLIENTS REQUEST BAK 8 O 1 6 OLD COUNTY ROAD N O . 5 4 � ® 1p (� (3 � � 1p � 11 ;,` n `; ,,, �. A 10/31 /05 CHECKED BY: 06/06/05 2 ADDED TOPO ELEVATIONS AND ADDITION TOPO WORK TO SURVEY BAK FOR: R O G ERS BEACH D EV EL O P K4EN T NEW PORT R I O H E Y , FLORID -A 34653 BR CE '' + tjIC4 NWkS7. 5b52 TC P.O. BOX 676 OFFICE: 727- 834 -81 40 FAX: 727 - 834 -81 50 FLORIDA R'I)d� URVEYOR` 09/15/04 1 REVEIW TITLE WORK AND ADD TO SURVEY BAK - F No.: SHEET No.: DATE: No: REVISIONS BY : CRYSTAL BEACH, FLORIDA 34681 L B 6 9 2 8 NOT VALID OF AI FLORIDA LICENSED SURVEYOR AND ORIGINAL ER ED SEAL 030155.2 1 OF 1 WPP WPP \j 2' CONC. GUTTER- X11 � NORTH BAYWAY BOULEVARD `�` 60' RIGHT -OF -WAY ,p - - O (P.B 38, PGS 38 -39) \f 36' ASPHALT PAVEMENT N h R= 4820.00' A-­289.08: CHD.= 289.04'(P &M) CB= S69'54' WPP ----- ----- ---- , CONCRETE APRON 29.9' 10' SETBACK LINE -1 aN h• •RS R= 1180.00' A= 43.74' 9 S� P.B. 38, PGS. 38 -39 \� \ 62.2' o b -- _.- .-- • - - - - -- - - -' -'J 5' DRAINAGE, UTILITY & 5.4' 5• PARKING SIDEWALK EASEMENT- D I V1 O.R.B. 6958, PGS.423 -424 10' j � 1 oil 1 CONC. h• �OND 0' C RIM EL: 5.30 - `; (2) STORY C.B.S. M 4'x4' 5' CONCRETE SIDEWALK CONCRETE PARKING LOT � (NO I '°• UNDER BUILDING - - -- INLET fo -- - - - -- - - -- - ! - _ -,-R -- -° I o GRASS WPP \j 2' CONC. GUTTER- X11 � NORTH BAYWAY BOULEVARD `�` 60' RIGHT -OF -WAY ,p - - O (P.B 38, PGS 38 -39) \f 36' ASPHALT PAVEMENT N h R= 4820.00' A-­289.08: CHD.= 289.04'(P &M) CB= S69'54' WPP ----- ----- ---- , CONCRETE APRON 29.9' 10' SETBACK LINE -1 aN h• 27.0' R= 1180.00' A= 43.74' I U °' P.B. 38, PGS. 38 -39 CB= S69'15'01'E(P &M) i 62.2' o LINK FENCE ASPHALT 0 Q >� - 11 i 5.4' 5• PARKING P.B. 38, PGS. 311-39 D I V1 LB 6928 10' j � 1 oil 1 CONC. �OND 0' C RIM EL: 5.30 - `; (2) STORY C.B.S. ASPHALT PARKING I. ADDRESS #6780 CONCRETE PARKING CONCRETE PARKING LOT � '°• UNDER BUILDING GARAGE EL. =6.18 In LOT 10 v m rq M T IPLj LOT 9 I BLOCK B BLOCKBB w m 0 \ a N W BLOCK B i ITI v 3 D 20 sZ ASPHALT a I PARKING LANTER N Z Z N - EL I CJI 'X "0 25,4, 1 62,2' ! PLANTER (1) STORY C.B.S. COMMERCIAL N �� a b O 6' 693 %�- , / __,.___...__.., SWALE 6Se CONCRETE 3 0� I LI GRASS FN /D \ LB 3889 TBM No. 2- EL. =6.97 41 LOT 19 BLOCK B (�WM V10' X10' I DALE fU ! TRANSFORM I CONC. HEADWALL 66 ii 2.2' i LOT 11 BLOCK B (2) STORY C.B.S. �6 ADDRESS #678C CONCRETE PARKING UNDER BUILDING GARAGE EL. =6.72 1" L -... -- ...... -- i SPIL WAY 5.5 SN /D LB 6928 4• ONC. N70'19'36'W(M) 112.12'(M) -- SIDEWALK SCIR I 62,3' N70 °29'S6'W _112.05' - - -- -- - SCIR 72.94'(M) 3.16'(M) i 1\170 °29'56'1W \ /1 N19 °30'04'E(M) ASPHALT PARKING 2 11 2006 hb h• aN h• �i R= 1180.00' A= 43.74' I U CHD: 43.74'(P &M) - H CB= S69'15'01'E(P &M) 5' CONCRETE SIDEWALK CONC. � eye I� LOT 12 BLOCK B �i 1 I U !� r H TENNIS COURTS ' D WITH 6' CHAI I c LINK FENCE 0 I ( OF LOT 13, BLOCK B ! J 1 1�D LAS I HINLLLAS ULIUN I Y, LL❑RIDA ` f 1ti � WPP �]u .. p,• FOUND RR SPIKE / SANITARY MANHOLE IN ASPHALT RIM EL.= 5.32 TBM NO. 1 EL. =5.01 __• —._.- 0 20 40 ------ --- -'- "�� S O� 10 0' RIM EL. 5.07 0 FS IN LE I WALLY N I ' _J �i 1 !� r r POINT OF BEGINNING hL)S IG NORTHEAST CORNER 0 - --- - )F_._.. ��� __._ ANT OF LOT 13, BLOCK B ! CONIC. 0.8' P.B. 38, PGS. 311-39 D _.� V1 LB 6928 10' j C7 1 CONC. �OND 0' C RIM EL: 5.30 ° INAGE CONC, POOL 0.7' CONC. J 1 1�D LAS I HINLLLAS ULIUN I Y, LL❑RIDA ` f 1ti � WPP �]u .. p,• FOUND RR SPIKE / SANITARY MANHOLE IN ASPHALT RIM EL.= 5.32 TBM NO. 1 EL. =5.01 __• —._.- 0 20 40 ------ --- -'- "�� S O� 10 0' RIM EL. 5.07 0 FS IN LE I WALLY N I ' _J �i 1 !� r r POINT OF BEGINNING 62.2' ! IG NORTHEAST CORNER 0 OF LOT 13, BLOCK B ! ii P.B. 38, PGS. 311-39 5.4' z I� 10' j C7 SANITARY MANHOLE CU C RIM EL: 5.30 ADDRESS #678B CONCRETE PARKING i I_ Zil 1.91 UNDER BUILDING o i w oii GARAGE EL. =6.76 CONCRETE Vail n DRIVEWAY oa;i 3: LOT 13 �a BLOCK B 116' it cr i J II �a 12' I 3 it rn [ mi^ it F 5.4' o N y 62.2' ` Iw- 9 W it // I w d 1 SWALE� �sJ - -�9 0 5. I S, if S \ N 9 �9 -- it ,. 5'C LOVER ® u � 3.3' 4.0' FIR, 5/ 0.3' N70 °29'56'W(P) 83.51'(P) (NO ID),/ N70'32137'W(M) 83.63'(M> ; „ it \s �O \f W a l- > t = W cz ¢w Q �OL } Q Y, Q r0% Q (11 3 aD I M W oy 1Lp IL Lj H �M 00 n: (L I- z w X W (L o_ I- J a CL a LEGAL DESCRIPTION: A PARCEL OF LAND LYING IN SECTION 17, TOWNSHIP 29 SOOT, RANGE 15 EAST, CITY OF CLEARWATER, PINELLA COUNTY, FLORIDA. BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: A PORTION OF LOTS 9, 10, BLOCK B AND ALL OF LOTS 11, 12, 13 AND 15, BLOCK B OF BAYSIDE SUBDIVISION N ACCORDING TO THE MAP OR PLAT THEREOF, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 38, PAGES 38 -39 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA. BEING FURTHER DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS, BEGINNING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT 13, BLOCK B; THENCE SOUTH 19'41'16' WEST, ALONG THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 13, BLOCK B, A DISTANCE OF 117.20 FEET; THENCE NORTH 70 °29'56' WEST, A DISTANCE OF 83.51 FEET, THENCE SOUTH 21'22'30' WEST, A DISTANCE OF 124.00 FEET TO A POINT ON THE ARC OF CIRCULAR CURVE CONCAVE TO THE NORTHEAST, HAVING A RADIUS OF 2640.00 FEET; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE TO THE RIGHT, AN ARC DISTANCE OF 60.01 FEET, A CHORD BEARING AND DISTANCE OF NORTH 73'20'38' WEST, A DISTANCE OF 60.01 FEET, TO A POINT ON A NON- RADIAL LINE; THENCE NORTH 20 °37'52' EAST, A DISTANCE OF 126.93 FEET; THENCE NORTH 70 °29'56' WEST, A DISTANCE OF 72,94 FEET; THENCE NORTH 19'30'04' EAST, A DISTANCE OF 3.3.16 FEET; THENCE NORTH 70 °19'36' WEST, A DISTANCE OF 112.12 FEET; THENCE NORTH 18 °22'31' EAST, A DISTANCE OF 117.66 FEET TO A POINT ON THE ARC OF A CIRCULAR CURVE CONCAVE TO THE SOUTHWEST, HAVING A RADIUS OF 4820.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTHEAST, ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE TO RIGHT, HAVING AN ARC DISTANCE OF 289.08 FEET, A CHORD BEARING AND DISTANCE OF SOUTH 69'54'23' EAST, A DISTANCE OF 289.04 FEET TO THE POINT OF REVERSE CURVATURE OF A CIRCULAR CURVE CONCAVE TO THE NORTHEAST, HAVING A RADIUS OF 1180.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTHEAST, ALONG THE ARC OF SAID THE ARC OF SAID CURVE TO THE LEFT, HAVING AN ARC DISTANCE OF 43.74 FEET, A CHORD BEARING AND DISTANCE OF SOUTH 69 °15'01" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 43.74 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. CONTAINING 47,215 SQUARE FEET, OR 1.0839 ACRES MORE OR LESS NOTES: 1. BEARINGS SHOWN HEREON ARE BASED ON THE EAST LINE OF BLOCK B, ACCORDING TO THE MAP OR PLAT THEREOF, HAVING A BEARING OF SOUTH 19'41'16' WEST. 2. ELEVATIONS SHOWN HEREON ARE BASED ON (N.A.V.D.) NORTH AMERICAN VERTICAL DATUM OF1988. 3, BENCHMARK - PINELLAS COUNTY BENCHMARK MAP No. 155, BRASS DISK IN CONCRETE MEDIAN, STAMPED LP -15, LABINS ELEVATION = 4.19. 4, THIS SURVEY WAS BASED ON THE TITLE COMMITMENT No. 40198026CA, DATED: FEBRUARY 24, 2004 @ 8:00 A.M. PERFORMED BY COMMONWEALTH LAND TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY. THERE MAY BE ADDITIONAL RESTRICTIONS THAT ARE NOT SHOWN ON THIS SURVEY. 5. ALL PROPERTY CORNERS ARE SET CAPPED (5/8') IRON ROD, LB 6928 UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 6. FLOOD ZONE INFORMATION: COMMUNITY PANEL No.- 125096 0104 G FLOOD ZONE: ZONE AE (EL,11) REVISED MAP DATE: SEPTEMBER 03, 2003 0.7 - CONC BLOCK WALL WALL LL CONC. WALK i I 5r9 ! SURVEYORS NOTES: (TITLE COMMITMENT No. 40198026CA): LOT 15 12' I ,I BLOCK B ! SCHEDULE B - SECTION 21 B F I ITEM No. 1: NO RESPONSE REQUIRED BY THE SURVEYOR. ITEM No, 2: NO RESPONSE REQUIRED BY THE SURVEYOR, ITEM No, 3: ALL ENCROACHMENTS ARE SHOWN AND DIMENSIONED ON THE DRAWING. n COVERED (1) STORY C.B.S. ^co it ¢1 ITEM No, 4, NO RESPONSE REQUIRED BY THE SURVEYOR. 11 (1) STORY C.B.S. CONC. =+I ADDRESS #696 o it ('j rat ITEM No, 51 NO RESPONSE REQUIRED BY THE SURVEYOR, ADDRESS #672 I a 26'1 0. ° COMMERCIAL I -- 1 ��/L� f; ITEM No, 61 NO RESPONSE REQUIRED BY THE SURVEYOR, COMMERCIAL o ! II ITEM No, 7: A BLANKET 10 FOOT FLORIDA POWER CORPORATION EASEMENT LYING 5.0 FEET SIDEWALK EASEMENT �� o !! a ASPHALT : d2 ;; riil ON EACH SIDE OF THE CENTERLINE OF ANY EXISTING SERVICES AS RECORDED IN O.R.B. 5026, O.R.B. 10971, PAGES 408 -410 bA! PARKING 33 111 p9 �I PAGES 1738 -1739 PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA.. n ! o it LD ITEM No. 8: INGRESS /EGRESS, PARKING AND PEDESTRIAN TRAFFIC EASEMENT AS SHOWN ON A Dw Do i LOT 14 I OUP jj LOTS 7,8,9,16,17 & 18, AS RECORDED IN O.R.B. 6958, PAGES 520 -526, PUBLIC RECORDS LOT 16 � (e• rr ern �n a BLOCK B ! �I II cu OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA. LOT 17 BLOCK B a n � w rAT� m 3 I mi>\ ! j ITEM No. 9: PARKING EASEMENT AGREEMENT ALONG THE WEST 25 FEET OF LOT 9 BLOCK B wj �Q a r'1�cn° ry yy It AND ALONG THE SOUTH 25 FEET OF LOTS 9 & 10, O.R.B. 6835, PAGES 1731 -1732, PUBLIC V'.� o A/C WPP j Ij I RECORDS ❑F PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA. u) o P�„�� � ; ;; ITEM No. 10: THE NORTH 5.00 FEET OF LOTS 7 -13 AND THE SOUTH 10.00 FEET OF LOTS i! I 15 -20, BLOCK 'B', DRAINAGE, UTILITY AND SIDEWALK EASEMENT FOR THE CITY OF ! e V ! i ii I CLEARWATER, RECORDED IN O.R.B. 6958, PAGES 423 -424, PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS I c°v i stn i y I it 1 COUNTY, FLORIDA. LEGEND: �' 1 J !� BRICK � i ii ITEM No. 11: ENCROACHMENT EASEMENT AS PRESENTLY EXISTS, ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF �PLA -f , 1�' S ; ! -1, _ ' rI f 4 PAVERS CONC, 4 ih U i it LOTS 9 & 10 O.R.B. 7173, PAGES 1896 -1899, PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA. 0 = DENOTES WOOD POWER POLE : 4 �j� ,��C� y9L i 1i ITEM No. 121 CROSS PARKING EASEMENT, NON- EXCLUSIVE EASEMENT, ON LOT 16, O.R.B. 11029, = DENOTES GUY WIRE & ANCHOR `• Ij =•I�il 14a.[1 „yW `, ,t I 15.0' 14.3' p. ! A = DENOTES SET PARKER KALON NAIL 9, DISK 10' DRAINAGE, UTILITY & 1 ASPHALT ! tia ASPHALT A 11,8' o' ASPHALT ! ii PAGES 763 -764, PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA, O = DENOTES SET CAPPED IRON ROD 1' S PARKING ii V ITEM No, 13: DUMPSTER PAD EASEMENT LOCATED ON LOT 10, O.R.B. 11634, PAGES 1784 -1787, yI� = DENOTES EXISTING GROUND ELEVATIONS SIDE WALK EASEMENT PARKING PARKING 1_. CONIC. b' R I I B• - •-- •••--�� -� i PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA. ✓ O.R.B. 6958, PGS,423 -424 ! 6 - FCI 1/ M EASEMENT T F DRAINAGE N TRAN F<Tff - -. .•- - ..• - - -• -- • II ITEM No. 14: EASE EN FOR MAINTENANCE ❑ CONCRETE DR IN GE P❑ D LOCATED ON FCM = FOUND CONCRETE MONUMENT i I N �_ ._� -• -- HD•= 87,15'(!1) 68 F FIR = FOUND IRON ROD i �(a i�AVERS ^6, _ - �- i P = N75 °03'OE C = __ - - - -• -- O.R.B. 109 1, PAGE 178 , PAGES 398-407, PUBLIC RECORDS ❑F PINELLAS _ Cg 87 45 (P) LB 61 � � LOT 16, BLOCK 'B' 7 4 FCIR =FOUND CAPPED IRON ROD ! = - FIP =FOUND IRON PIPE ---.._ ....._ ---- • -- - _ --_ -. - --- - -I __.--- •-- ••._______. -•- --- •- • --- -- _._..._,_ -•-- - -.._ _.-- '. - - - -a6 - - - - 06 _ __ T 16, BLOCK B , O.R.B. 10971, PAGES 408 -410, t2 BONE CB N74'56'3c)'\J CH --!3H a COUNTY, FLORIDA. ` VPP WPP. - • -- - !' "�,g I ITEM No. 151 SIDEWALK EASEMENT LOCATED ON L❑ ' ' FPIP = FOUND PINCHED IRON PIPE 4 f J 9 QR 9' 9' I; I PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA, R = RADIUS +, 12' 12' SIDEWALK LB 2129/- — ITEM No, 16: PARKING AGREEMENT OF (8) PARKING SPACES CLOSES TO THE MOTELS FOR THEIR A = ARC DISTANCE ! g FCIR 5 5' CONCRETE F�� I USE O.R.B. 4382 PAGES 1044 -1046 PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA, CH = CHORD HEARING LB 3889. _ _ _ 2! ITEM No. 17: NO RESPONSE REQUIRED BY THE SURVEYOR. D =DELTA 5' CONCRE E SIDEWALK ba �2 O OHW OVERHEAD WIRES h' _ = ^ - -- ��! ITEM No. 181 NO RESPONSE REQUIRED BY THE SURVEYOR. ORB = OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 2' CONC CURB & GUTTER ca j_! ^_. - - --� =j- r- ---`� ITEM No. 19: NO RESPONSE REQUIRED BY THE SURVEYOR. PG = PAGE boo SI = = _�'J PH = PLAT BOOK __ . - - -_ R 2640.00' A 60.01' ITEM No. 20: NO RESPONSE REQUIRED BY THE SURVEYOR. (P) = PLAT �� sa 8 __ .._ -• CHD.= 60.01'(P &M) LA ____ -• --- - ___...__ - CB= N73.20'38' &M) _ (M) = MEASURED Ui _ - - - RIM El.= 4.79 ' _ 'S- ITEM No 21: NO RESPONSE REQUIRED BY THE SURVEYOR. _ Sr SANITARY MANHOLE ITEM No 221 NO RESPONSE REQUIRED BY THE SURVEYOR. (F) = FIELD ui " 2L- _rte- _ dr- m ~ i ITEM No, 23: NO RESPONCE REQUIRED BY THE SURVEYOR, (R) = RADIAL SOUTH GULFVIEW BOULEVARD - �- - -' s � - - - -____ 8S ITEM No. 24: NO RESPONSE REQUIRED BY THE SURVEYOR. (C) = CALCULATED _ _.__._. —._ -.- 06 — p� ITEM No. 25, NO RESPONSE REQUIRED BY THE SURVEYOR. (D) = DEED -- S _ _---- - - - - -- — ------ - - -- -- — - -- - -- h FND =FOUND — O SANITARY MANHOLE ITEM No. 26: N❑ RESPONSE REQUIRED BY THE SURVEYOR, — �`R vA 60' RI HT -OF -WAY RIM EL.= 6,2B ! �� ITEM No. 27: NO RESPONSE REQUIRED BY THE SURVEYOR. LLF.EL. = LOWEST LIVING FLOOR ELEVATION —(p,$, 38 PGS, 38 -39) 2 i �' MLP = METAL LIGHT POLE ° ITEM No. 28: NO RESPONSE REQUIRED BY THE SURVEYOR, 36' ASPH LT PAVEMENT �`3 a' ' ITEM No. 291 NO RESPONSE REQUIRED BY THE SURVEYOR. WLP = WOOD LIGHT POLE o _. WPP = WOOD POWER POLE o �2 ITEM No. 30: NO RESPONSE REQUIRED BY THE SURVEYOR. WM = WATERMETER h' h' h' y FND,'X' __.- �7!{W- --- -•- WpP ITEM No, 31: NO RESPONSE REQUIRED BY THE SURVEYOR, WV =WATER VALVE -•- - WPP RM = RECLAIMED WATER SYMBOL LEGEND (NO ID) ITEM No. 32: NO RESPONSE REQUIRED BY THE SURVEYOR. 2' CONC CURB &GUTTER FND,'X' CUT IN ITEM No, 33: NO RESPONSE REQUIRED BY THE SURVEYOR, BFP = BACKFLOW PREVENTER10' DENOTES PALM TREE - SIZE INDICATED (NO ID) [DEW ALK LP = LIGHT POLE CUT IN ITEM No. 341 NO RESPONSE REQUIRED BY THE SURVEYOR. ID = IDENTIFICATION O 10' DENOTES A PINE TREE - SIZE INDICATED SIDEWALK ITEM No, 351 NO RESPONSE REQUIRED BY THE SURVEYOR. SPKND = SET PARKER KALON NAIL & DISK FIP 1/2 10• DENOTES AN OAK TREE - SIZE INDICATED ITEM No. 361 NO RESPONSE REQUIRED BY THE SURVEYOR. FPKND = FOUND PARKER KALON NAIL & DISK CERTIFIED TO. LB = LICENSED BUSINESS (NO ID) ITEM No. 37: AS SHOWN ON THE DRAWING AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 38, PAGES 38 -39 OF THE 10' DENOTES AN OAK TREE - SIZE INDICATED CONC. = CONCRETE SKTEL BLIC RECORDS, PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA. , INC. . A TREE LABELED 'TWIN' IS 2 TRUNKS MEASURED ITEM No. 381 NO RESPONSE REQUIRE BY THE SURVEYOR. 12/05/05 9 REVISED PROPERTY LINE LOTS 9 & 10 PER CLIENT REQUEST BAK 4' ABOVE THE GROUND FROM 1 MAIN TRUNK, FIFTH THIRD BANK ITEM No. 39: NO RESPONSE REQUIRED BY THE SURVEYOR. 12/01/05 8 REVISED PROPERTY LINE LOTS 9 & 10 PER CLIENT REQUEST BAK 'TRIPLE' IS 3 TRUNKS MEASURED 4' ABOVE THE COMMONWEALTH LAND TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY ITEM No. 40: NO RESPONSE REQUIRED BY THE SURVEYOR. 11/29/05 7 REVISED BOUNDARY PER CLIENT REQUEST BAK GROUND FROM I MAIN TRUNK SH UMAKE R, LOOP & KENDRICK, LLP BAK SCALE FIELD BOOK 10/31/05 6 REVISED BOUNDARY PER CLIENT REQUEST LAST DATE D WORK. JULY 25, 2005 1' =20' 99125 B/99152A 08/09/05 5 REVISED CERTIFICATIONS BAK C L E A RW A T E R BEACH T8 S T A U B S U R V E J , 07/26/05 4 REVISED BOUNDARY & LEGAL PER CLIENTS REQUEST BAK (PLAYA DEL J n L ) PROFESSIONAL SURVEYORS AND MAPPERS DRAWN BY- PAGES 06/23/05 3 REVISED BOUNDARY & LEGAL PER CLIENTS REQUEST BAK 8016 OLD COUNTY ROAD No. 54 T ❑ FD ❑ C A P H I C 12/05/05 BAK 1- 6/44 -46 CHECKED BY: 06/06/05 2 ADDED TOPO ELEVATIONS AND ADDITION TOP❑ WORK TO SURVEY BAK FOR; R❑GERS BEACH DEVELOPMENT NEW PORT RICHEY, FLORIDA 34653 BRUCE A. KLEIN, PSM No. 5052 TC 09/15/04 1 REVEIW TITLE WORK AND ADD TO SURVEY BAK P.D. BOX 676 OFFICE: 727 - 834 -8140 FAX: 727 - 834 -8150 \ / FLORIDA REGISTERED SURVEYOR CRYSTAL BEACH, FLORIDA 3 4 6 8 1 j� v NOT VALID WITHOUT THE SIGNATURE AND ORIGINAL RAISED SEAL JOB No: SHEET No, DATE: No: REVISIONS BY: LB 692E OF A FLORIDA LICENSED SURVEYOR AND MAPPER 030155.2 1 OF 1 18' ! !� r r (2) STORY C.B.S. 6 6 \s �O \f W a l- > t = W cz ¢w Q �OL } Q Y, Q r0% Q (11 3 aD I M W oy 1Lp IL Lj H �M 00 n: (L I- z w X W (L o_ I- J a CL a LEGAL DESCRIPTION: A PARCEL OF LAND LYING IN SECTION 17, TOWNSHIP 29 SOOT, RANGE 15 EAST, CITY OF CLEARWATER, PINELLA COUNTY, FLORIDA. BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: A PORTION OF LOTS 9, 10, BLOCK B AND ALL OF LOTS 11, 12, 13 AND 15, BLOCK B OF BAYSIDE SUBDIVISION N ACCORDING TO THE MAP OR PLAT THEREOF, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 38, PAGES 38 -39 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA. BEING FURTHER DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS, BEGINNING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT 13, BLOCK B; THENCE SOUTH 19'41'16' WEST, ALONG THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 13, BLOCK B, A DISTANCE OF 117.20 FEET; THENCE NORTH 70 °29'56' WEST, A DISTANCE OF 83.51 FEET, THENCE SOUTH 21'22'30' WEST, A DISTANCE OF 124.00 FEET TO A POINT ON THE ARC OF CIRCULAR CURVE CONCAVE TO THE NORTHEAST, HAVING A RADIUS OF 2640.00 FEET; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE TO THE RIGHT, AN ARC DISTANCE OF 60.01 FEET, A CHORD BEARING AND DISTANCE OF NORTH 73'20'38' WEST, A DISTANCE OF 60.01 FEET, TO A POINT ON A NON- RADIAL LINE; THENCE NORTH 20 °37'52' EAST, A DISTANCE OF 126.93 FEET; THENCE NORTH 70 °29'56' WEST, A DISTANCE OF 72,94 FEET; THENCE NORTH 19'30'04' EAST, A DISTANCE OF 3.3.16 FEET; THENCE NORTH 70 °19'36' WEST, A DISTANCE OF 112.12 FEET; THENCE NORTH 18 °22'31' EAST, A DISTANCE OF 117.66 FEET TO A POINT ON THE ARC OF A CIRCULAR CURVE CONCAVE TO THE SOUTHWEST, HAVING A RADIUS OF 4820.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTHEAST, ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE TO RIGHT, HAVING AN ARC DISTANCE OF 289.08 FEET, A CHORD BEARING AND DISTANCE OF SOUTH 69'54'23' EAST, A DISTANCE OF 289.04 FEET TO THE POINT OF REVERSE CURVATURE OF A CIRCULAR CURVE CONCAVE TO THE NORTHEAST, HAVING A RADIUS OF 1180.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTHEAST, ALONG THE ARC OF SAID THE ARC OF SAID CURVE TO THE LEFT, HAVING AN ARC DISTANCE OF 43.74 FEET, A CHORD BEARING AND DISTANCE OF SOUTH 69 °15'01" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 43.74 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. CONTAINING 47,215 SQUARE FEET, OR 1.0839 ACRES MORE OR LESS NOTES: 1. BEARINGS SHOWN HEREON ARE BASED ON THE EAST LINE OF BLOCK B, ACCORDING TO THE MAP OR PLAT THEREOF, HAVING A BEARING OF SOUTH 19'41'16' WEST. 2. ELEVATIONS SHOWN HEREON ARE BASED ON (N.A.V.D.) NORTH AMERICAN VERTICAL DATUM OF1988. 3, BENCHMARK - PINELLAS COUNTY BENCHMARK MAP No. 155, BRASS DISK IN CONCRETE MEDIAN, STAMPED LP -15, LABINS ELEVATION = 4.19. 4, THIS SURVEY WAS BASED ON THE TITLE COMMITMENT No. 40198026CA, DATED: FEBRUARY 24, 2004 @ 8:00 A.M. PERFORMED BY COMMONWEALTH LAND TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY. THERE MAY BE ADDITIONAL RESTRICTIONS THAT ARE NOT SHOWN ON THIS SURVEY. 5. ALL PROPERTY CORNERS ARE SET CAPPED (5/8') IRON ROD, LB 6928 UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 6. FLOOD ZONE INFORMATION: COMMUNITY PANEL No.- 125096 0104 G FLOOD ZONE: ZONE AE (EL,11) REVISED MAP DATE: SEPTEMBER 03, 2003 0.7 - CONC BLOCK WALL WALL LL CONC. WALK i I 5r9 ! SURVEYORS NOTES: (TITLE COMMITMENT No. 40198026CA): LOT 15 12' I ,I BLOCK B ! SCHEDULE B - SECTION 21 B F I ITEM No. 1: NO RESPONSE REQUIRED BY THE SURVEYOR. ITEM No, 2: NO RESPONSE REQUIRED BY THE SURVEYOR, ITEM No, 3: ALL ENCROACHMENTS ARE SHOWN AND DIMENSIONED ON THE DRAWING. n COVERED (1) STORY C.B.S. ^co it ¢1 ITEM No, 4, NO RESPONSE REQUIRED BY THE SURVEYOR. 11 (1) STORY C.B.S. CONC. =+I ADDRESS #696 o it ('j rat ITEM No, 51 NO RESPONSE REQUIRED BY THE SURVEYOR, ADDRESS #672 I a 26'1 0. ° COMMERCIAL I -- 1 ��/L� f; ITEM No, 61 NO RESPONSE REQUIRED BY THE SURVEYOR, COMMERCIAL o ! II ITEM No, 7: A BLANKET 10 FOOT FLORIDA POWER CORPORATION EASEMENT LYING 5.0 FEET SIDEWALK EASEMENT �� o !! a ASPHALT : d2 ;; riil ON EACH SIDE OF THE CENTERLINE OF ANY EXISTING SERVICES AS RECORDED IN O.R.B. 5026, O.R.B. 10971, PAGES 408 -410 bA! PARKING 33 111 p9 �I PAGES 1738 -1739 PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA.. n ! o it LD ITEM No. 8: INGRESS /EGRESS, PARKING AND PEDESTRIAN TRAFFIC EASEMENT AS SHOWN ON A Dw Do i LOT 14 I OUP jj LOTS 7,8,9,16,17 & 18, AS RECORDED IN O.R.B. 6958, PAGES 520 -526, PUBLIC RECORDS LOT 16 � (e• rr ern �n a BLOCK B ! �I II cu OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA. LOT 17 BLOCK B a n � w rAT� m 3 I mi>\ ! j ITEM No. 9: PARKING EASEMENT AGREEMENT ALONG THE WEST 25 FEET OF LOT 9 BLOCK B wj �Q a r'1�cn° ry yy It AND ALONG THE SOUTH 25 FEET OF LOTS 9 & 10, O.R.B. 6835, PAGES 1731 -1732, PUBLIC V'.� o A/C WPP j Ij I RECORDS ❑F PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA. u) o P�„�� � ; ;; ITEM No. 10: THE NORTH 5.00 FEET OF LOTS 7 -13 AND THE SOUTH 10.00 FEET OF LOTS i! I 15 -20, BLOCK 'B', DRAINAGE, UTILITY AND SIDEWALK EASEMENT FOR THE CITY OF ! e V ! i ii I CLEARWATER, RECORDED IN O.R.B. 6958, PAGES 423 -424, PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS I c°v i stn i y I it 1 COUNTY, FLORIDA. LEGEND: �' 1 J !� BRICK � i ii ITEM No. 11: ENCROACHMENT EASEMENT AS PRESENTLY EXISTS, ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF �PLA -f , 1�' S ; ! -1, _ ' rI f 4 PAVERS CONC, 4 ih U i it LOTS 9 & 10 O.R.B. 7173, PAGES 1896 -1899, PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA. 0 = DENOTES WOOD POWER POLE : 4 �j� ,��C� y9L i 1i ITEM No. 121 CROSS PARKING EASEMENT, NON- EXCLUSIVE EASEMENT, ON LOT 16, O.R.B. 11029, = DENOTES GUY WIRE & ANCHOR `• Ij =•I�il 14a.[1 „yW `, ,t I 15.0' 14.3' p. ! A = DENOTES SET PARKER KALON NAIL 9, DISK 10' DRAINAGE, UTILITY & 1 ASPHALT ! tia ASPHALT A 11,8' o' ASPHALT ! ii PAGES 763 -764, PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA, O = DENOTES SET CAPPED IRON ROD 1' S PARKING ii V ITEM No, 13: DUMPSTER PAD EASEMENT LOCATED ON LOT 10, O.R.B. 11634, PAGES 1784 -1787, yI� = DENOTES EXISTING GROUND ELEVATIONS SIDE WALK EASEMENT PARKING PARKING 1_. CONIC. b' R I I B• - •-- •••--�� -� i PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA. ✓ O.R.B. 6958, PGS,423 -424 ! 6 - FCI 1/ M EASEMENT T F DRAINAGE N TRAN F<Tff - -. .•- - ..• - - -• -- • II ITEM No. 14: EASE EN FOR MAINTENANCE ❑ CONCRETE DR IN GE P❑ D LOCATED ON FCM = FOUND CONCRETE MONUMENT i I N �_ ._� -• -- HD•= 87,15'(!1) 68 F FIR = FOUND IRON ROD i �(a i�AVERS ^6, _ - �- i P = N75 °03'OE C = __ - - - -• -- O.R.B. 109 1, PAGE 178 , PAGES 398-407, PUBLIC RECORDS ❑F PINELLAS _ Cg 87 45 (P) LB 61 � � LOT 16, BLOCK 'B' 7 4 FCIR =FOUND CAPPED IRON ROD ! = - FIP =FOUND IRON PIPE ---.._ ....._ ---- • -- - _ --_ -. - --- - -I __.--- •-- ••._______. -•- --- •- • --- -- _._..._,_ -•-- - -.._ _.-- '. - - - -a6 - - - - 06 _ __ T 16, BLOCK B , O.R.B. 10971, PAGES 408 -410, t2 BONE CB N74'56'3c)'\J CH --!3H a COUNTY, FLORIDA. ` VPP WPP. - • -- - !' "�,g I ITEM No. 151 SIDEWALK EASEMENT LOCATED ON L❑ ' ' FPIP = FOUND PINCHED IRON PIPE 4 f J 9 QR 9' 9' I; I PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA, R = RADIUS +, 12' 12' SIDEWALK LB 2129/- — ITEM No, 16: PARKING AGREEMENT OF (8) PARKING SPACES CLOSES TO THE MOTELS FOR THEIR A = ARC DISTANCE ! g FCIR 5 5' CONCRETE F�� I USE O.R.B. 4382 PAGES 1044 -1046 PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA, CH = CHORD HEARING LB 3889. _ _ _ 2! ITEM No. 17: NO RESPONSE REQUIRED BY THE SURVEYOR. D =DELTA 5' CONCRE E SIDEWALK ba �2 O OHW OVERHEAD WIRES h' _ = ^ - -- ��! ITEM No. 181 NO RESPONSE REQUIRED BY THE SURVEYOR. ORB = OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 2' CONC CURB & GUTTER ca j_! ^_. - - --� =j- r- ---`� ITEM No. 19: NO RESPONSE REQUIRED BY THE SURVEYOR. PG = PAGE boo SI = = _�'J PH = PLAT BOOK __ . - - -_ R 2640.00' A 60.01' ITEM No. 20: NO RESPONSE REQUIRED BY THE SURVEYOR. (P) = PLAT �� sa 8 __ .._ -• CHD.= 60.01'(P &M) LA ____ -• --- - ___...__ - CB= N73.20'38' &M) _ (M) = MEASURED Ui _ - - - RIM El.= 4.79 ' _ 'S- ITEM No 21: NO RESPONSE REQUIRED BY THE SURVEYOR. _ Sr SANITARY MANHOLE ITEM No 221 NO RESPONSE REQUIRED BY THE SURVEYOR. (F) = FIELD ui " 2L- _rte- _ dr- m ~ i ITEM No, 23: NO RESPONCE REQUIRED BY THE SURVEYOR, (R) = RADIAL SOUTH GULFVIEW BOULEVARD - �- - -' s � - - - -____ 8S ITEM No. 24: NO RESPONSE REQUIRED BY THE SURVEYOR. (C) = CALCULATED _ _.__._. —._ -.- 06 — p� ITEM No. 25, NO RESPONSE REQUIRED BY THE SURVEYOR. (D) = DEED -- S _ _---- - - - - -- — ------ - - -- -- — - -- - -- h FND =FOUND — O SANITARY MANHOLE ITEM No. 26: N❑ RESPONSE REQUIRED BY THE SURVEYOR, — �`R vA 60' RI HT -OF -WAY RIM EL.= 6,2B ! �� ITEM No. 27: NO RESPONSE REQUIRED BY THE SURVEYOR. LLF.EL. = LOWEST LIVING FLOOR ELEVATION —(p,$, 38 PGS, 38 -39) 2 i �' MLP = METAL LIGHT POLE ° ITEM No. 28: NO RESPONSE REQUIRED BY THE SURVEYOR, 36' ASPH LT PAVEMENT �`3 a' ' ITEM No. 291 NO RESPONSE REQUIRED BY THE SURVEYOR. WLP = WOOD LIGHT POLE o _. WPP = WOOD POWER POLE o �2 ITEM No. 30: NO RESPONSE REQUIRED BY THE SURVEYOR. WM = WATERMETER h' h' h' y FND,'X' __.- �7!{W- --- -•- WpP ITEM No, 31: NO RESPONSE REQUIRED BY THE SURVEYOR, WV =WATER VALVE -•- - WPP RM = RECLAIMED WATER SYMBOL LEGEND (NO ID) ITEM No. 32: NO RESPONSE REQUIRED BY THE SURVEYOR. 2' CONC CURB &GUTTER FND,'X' CUT IN ITEM No, 33: NO RESPONSE REQUIRED BY THE SURVEYOR, BFP = BACKFLOW PREVENTER10' DENOTES PALM TREE - SIZE INDICATED (NO ID) [DEW ALK LP = LIGHT POLE CUT IN ITEM No. 341 NO RESPONSE REQUIRED BY THE SURVEYOR. ID = IDENTIFICATION O 10' DENOTES A PINE TREE - SIZE INDICATED SIDEWALK ITEM No, 351 NO RESPONSE REQUIRED BY THE SURVEYOR. SPKND = SET PARKER KALON NAIL & DISK FIP 1/2 10• DENOTES AN OAK TREE - SIZE INDICATED ITEM No. 361 NO RESPONSE REQUIRED BY THE SURVEYOR. FPKND = FOUND PARKER KALON NAIL & DISK CERTIFIED TO. LB = LICENSED BUSINESS (NO ID) ITEM No. 37: AS SHOWN ON THE DRAWING AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 38, PAGES 38 -39 OF THE 10' DENOTES AN OAK TREE - SIZE INDICATED CONC. = CONCRETE SKTEL BLIC RECORDS, PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA. , INC. . A TREE LABELED 'TWIN' IS 2 TRUNKS MEASURED ITEM No. 381 NO RESPONSE REQUIRE BY THE SURVEYOR. 12/05/05 9 REVISED PROPERTY LINE LOTS 9 & 10 PER CLIENT REQUEST BAK 4' ABOVE THE GROUND FROM 1 MAIN TRUNK, FIFTH THIRD BANK ITEM No. 39: NO RESPONSE REQUIRED BY THE SURVEYOR. 12/01/05 8 REVISED PROPERTY LINE LOTS 9 & 10 PER CLIENT REQUEST BAK 'TRIPLE' IS 3 TRUNKS MEASURED 4' ABOVE THE COMMONWEALTH LAND TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY ITEM No. 40: NO RESPONSE REQUIRED BY THE SURVEYOR. 11/29/05 7 REVISED BOUNDARY PER CLIENT REQUEST BAK GROUND FROM I MAIN TRUNK SH UMAKE R, LOOP & KENDRICK, LLP BAK SCALE FIELD BOOK 10/31/05 6 REVISED BOUNDARY PER CLIENT REQUEST LAST DATE D WORK. JULY 25, 2005 1' =20' 99125 B/99152A 08/09/05 5 REVISED CERTIFICATIONS BAK C L E A RW A T E R BEACH T8 S T A U B S U R V E J , 07/26/05 4 REVISED BOUNDARY & LEGAL PER CLIENTS REQUEST BAK (PLAYA DEL J n L ) PROFESSIONAL SURVEYORS AND MAPPERS DRAWN BY- PAGES 06/23/05 3 REVISED BOUNDARY & LEGAL PER CLIENTS REQUEST BAK 8016 OLD COUNTY ROAD No. 54 T ❑ FD ❑ C A P H I C 12/05/05 BAK 1- 6/44 -46 CHECKED BY: 06/06/05 2 ADDED TOPO ELEVATIONS AND ADDITION TOP❑ WORK TO SURVEY BAK FOR; R❑GERS BEACH DEVELOPMENT NEW PORT RICHEY, FLORIDA 34653 BRUCE A. KLEIN, PSM No. 5052 TC 09/15/04 1 REVEIW TITLE WORK AND ADD TO SURVEY BAK P.D. BOX 676 OFFICE: 727 - 834 -8140 FAX: 727 - 834 -8150 \ / FLORIDA REGISTERED SURVEYOR CRYSTAL BEACH, FLORIDA 3 4 6 8 1 j� v NOT VALID WITHOUT THE SIGNATURE AND ORIGINAL RAISED SEAL JOB No: SHEET No, DATE: No: REVISIONS BY: LB 692E OF A FLORIDA LICENSED SURVEYOR AND MAPPER 030155.2 1 OF 1 LEGEND: �' 1 J !� BRICK � i ii ITEM No. 11: ENCROACHMENT EASEMENT AS PRESENTLY EXISTS, ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF �PLA -f , 1�' S ; ! -1, _ ' rI f 4 PAVERS CONC, 4 ih U i it LOTS 9 & 10 O.R.B. 7173, PAGES 1896 -1899, PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA. 0 = DENOTES WOOD POWER POLE : 4 �j� ,��C� y9L i 1i ITEM No. 121 CROSS PARKING EASEMENT, NON- EXCLUSIVE EASEMENT, ON LOT 16, O.R.B. 11029, = DENOTES GUY WIRE & ANCHOR `• Ij =•I�il 14a.[1 „yW `, ,t I 15.0' 14.3' p. ! A = DENOTES SET PARKER KALON NAIL 9, DISK 10' DRAINAGE, UTILITY & 1 ASPHALT ! tia ASPHALT A 11,8' o' ASPHALT ! ii PAGES 763 -764, PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA, O = DENOTES SET CAPPED IRON ROD 1' S PARKING ii V ITEM No, 13: DUMPSTER PAD EASEMENT LOCATED ON LOT 10, O.R.B. 11634, PAGES 1784 -1787, yI� = DENOTES EXISTING GROUND ELEVATIONS SIDE WALK EASEMENT PARKING PARKING 1_. CONIC. b' R I I B• - •-- •••--�� -� i PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA. ✓ O.R.B. 6958, PGS,423 -424 ! 6 - FCI 1/ M EASEMENT T F DRAINAGE N TRAN F<Tff - -. .•- - ..• - - -• -- • II ITEM No. 14: EASE EN FOR MAINTENANCE ❑ CONCRETE DR IN GE P❑ D LOCATED ON FCM = FOUND CONCRETE MONUMENT i I N �_ ._� -• -- HD•= 87,15'(!1) 68 F FIR = FOUND IRON ROD i �(a i�AVERS ^6, _ - �- i P = N75 °03'OE C = __ - - - -• -- O.R.B. 109 1, PAGE 178 , PAGES 398-407, PUBLIC RECORDS ❑F PINELLAS _ Cg 87 45 (P) LB 61 � � LOT 16, BLOCK 'B' 7 4 FCIR =FOUND CAPPED IRON ROD ! = - FIP =FOUND IRON PIPE ---.._ ....._ ---- • -- - _ --_ -. - --- - -I __.--- •-- ••._______. -•- --- •- • --- -- _._..._,_ -•-- - -.._ _.-- '. - - - -a6 - - - - 06 _ __ T 16, BLOCK B , O.R.B. 10971, PAGES 408 -410, t2 BONE CB N74'56'3c)'\J CH --!3H a COUNTY, FLORIDA. ` VPP WPP. - • -- - !' "�,g I ITEM No. 151 SIDEWALK EASEMENT LOCATED ON L❑ ' ' FPIP = FOUND PINCHED IRON PIPE 4 f J 9 QR 9' 9' I; I PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA, R = RADIUS +, 12' 12' SIDEWALK LB 2129/- — ITEM No, 16: PARKING AGREEMENT OF (8) PARKING SPACES CLOSES TO THE MOTELS FOR THEIR A = ARC DISTANCE ! g FCIR 5 5' CONCRETE F�� I USE O.R.B. 4382 PAGES 1044 -1046 PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA, CH = CHORD HEARING LB 3889. _ _ _ 2! ITEM No. 17: NO RESPONSE REQUIRED BY THE SURVEYOR. D =DELTA 5' CONCRE E SIDEWALK ba �2 O OHW OVERHEAD WIRES h' _ = ^ - -- ��! ITEM No. 181 NO RESPONSE REQUIRED BY THE SURVEYOR. ORB = OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 2' CONC CURB & GUTTER ca j_! ^_. - - --� =j- r- ---`� ITEM No. 19: NO RESPONSE REQUIRED BY THE SURVEYOR. PG = PAGE boo SI = = _�'J PH = PLAT BOOK __ . - - -_ R 2640.00' A 60.01' ITEM No. 20: NO RESPONSE REQUIRED BY THE SURVEYOR. (P) = PLAT �� sa 8 __ .._ -• CHD.= 60.01'(P &M) LA ____ -• --- - ___...__ - CB= N73.20'38' &M) _ (M) = MEASURED Ui _ - - - RIM El.= 4.79 ' _ 'S- ITEM No 21: NO RESPONSE REQUIRED BY THE SURVEYOR. _ Sr SANITARY MANHOLE ITEM No 221 NO RESPONSE REQUIRED BY THE SURVEYOR. (F) = FIELD ui " 2L- _rte- _ dr- m ~ i ITEM No, 23: NO RESPONCE REQUIRED BY THE SURVEYOR, (R) = RADIAL SOUTH GULFVIEW BOULEVARD - �- - -' s � - - - -____ 8S ITEM No. 24: NO RESPONSE REQUIRED BY THE SURVEYOR. (C) = CALCULATED _ _.__._. —._ -.- 06 — p� ITEM No. 25, NO RESPONSE REQUIRED BY THE SURVEYOR. (D) = DEED -- S _ _---- - - - - -- — ------ - - -- -- — - -- - -- h FND =FOUND — O SANITARY MANHOLE ITEM No. 26: N❑ RESPONSE REQUIRED BY THE SURVEYOR, — �`R vA 60' RI HT -OF -WAY RIM EL.= 6,2B ! �� ITEM No. 27: NO RESPONSE REQUIRED BY THE SURVEYOR. LLF.EL. = LOWEST LIVING FLOOR ELEVATION —(p,$, 38 PGS, 38 -39) 2 i �' MLP = METAL LIGHT POLE ° ITEM No. 28: NO RESPONSE REQUIRED BY THE SURVEYOR, 36' ASPH LT PAVEMENT �`3 a' ' ITEM No. 291 NO RESPONSE REQUIRED BY THE SURVEYOR. WLP = WOOD LIGHT POLE o _. WPP = WOOD POWER POLE o �2 ITEM No. 30: NO RESPONSE REQUIRED BY THE SURVEYOR. WM = WATERMETER h' h' h' y FND,'X' __.- �7!{W- --- -•- WpP ITEM No, 31: NO RESPONSE REQUIRED BY THE SURVEYOR, WV =WATER VALVE -•- - WPP RM = RECLAIMED WATER SYMBOL LEGEND (NO ID) ITEM No. 32: NO RESPONSE REQUIRED BY THE SURVEYOR. 2' CONC CURB &GUTTER FND,'X' CUT IN ITEM No, 33: NO RESPONSE REQUIRED BY THE SURVEYOR, BFP = BACKFLOW PREVENTER10' DENOTES PALM TREE - SIZE INDICATED (NO ID) [DEW ALK LP = LIGHT POLE CUT IN ITEM No. 341 NO RESPONSE REQUIRED BY THE SURVEYOR. ID = IDENTIFICATION O 10' DENOTES A PINE TREE - SIZE INDICATED SIDEWALK ITEM No, 351 NO RESPONSE REQUIRED BY THE SURVEYOR. SPKND = SET PARKER KALON NAIL & DISK FIP 1/2 10• DENOTES AN OAK TREE - SIZE INDICATED ITEM No. 361 NO RESPONSE REQUIRED BY THE SURVEYOR. FPKND = FOUND PARKER KALON NAIL & DISK CERTIFIED TO. LB = LICENSED BUSINESS (NO ID) ITEM No. 37: AS SHOWN ON THE DRAWING AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 38, PAGES 38 -39 OF THE 10' DENOTES AN OAK TREE - SIZE INDICATED CONC. = CONCRETE SKTEL BLIC RECORDS, PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA. , INC. . A TREE LABELED 'TWIN' IS 2 TRUNKS MEASURED ITEM No. 381 NO RESPONSE REQUIRE BY THE SURVEYOR. 12/05/05 9 REVISED PROPERTY LINE LOTS 9 & 10 PER CLIENT REQUEST BAK 4' ABOVE THE GROUND FROM 1 MAIN TRUNK, FIFTH THIRD BANK ITEM No. 39: NO RESPONSE REQUIRED BY THE SURVEYOR. 12/01/05 8 REVISED PROPERTY LINE LOTS 9 & 10 PER CLIENT REQUEST BAK 'TRIPLE' IS 3 TRUNKS MEASURED 4' ABOVE THE COMMONWEALTH LAND TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY ITEM No. 40: NO RESPONSE REQUIRED BY THE SURVEYOR. 11/29/05 7 REVISED BOUNDARY PER CLIENT REQUEST BAK GROUND FROM I MAIN TRUNK SH UMAKE R, LOOP & KENDRICK, LLP BAK SCALE FIELD BOOK 10/31/05 6 REVISED BOUNDARY PER CLIENT REQUEST LAST DATE D WORK. JULY 25, 2005 1' =20' 99125 B/99152A 08/09/05 5 REVISED CERTIFICATIONS BAK C L E A RW A T E R BEACH T8 S T A U B S U R V E J , 07/26/05 4 REVISED BOUNDARY & LEGAL PER CLIENTS REQUEST BAK (PLAYA DEL J n L ) PROFESSIONAL SURVEYORS AND MAPPERS DRAWN BY- PAGES 06/23/05 3 REVISED BOUNDARY & LEGAL PER CLIENTS REQUEST BAK 8016 OLD COUNTY ROAD No. 54 T ❑ FD ❑ C A P H I C 12/05/05 BAK 1- 6/44 -46 CHECKED BY: 06/06/05 2 ADDED TOPO ELEVATIONS AND ADDITION TOP❑ WORK TO SURVEY BAK FOR; R❑GERS BEACH DEVELOPMENT NEW PORT RICHEY, FLORIDA 34653 BRUCE A. KLEIN, PSM No. 5052 TC 09/15/04 1 REVEIW TITLE WORK AND ADD TO SURVEY BAK P.D. BOX 676 OFFICE: 727 - 834 -8140 FAX: 727 - 834 -8150 \ / FLORIDA REGISTERED SURVEYOR CRYSTAL BEACH, FLORIDA 3 4 6 8 1 j� v NOT VALID WITHOUT THE SIGNATURE AND ORIGINAL RAISED SEAL JOB No: SHEET No, DATE: No: REVISIONS BY: LB 692E OF A FLORIDA LICENSED SURVEYOR AND MAPPER 030155.2 1 OF 1