Loading...
FLD2007-11034; TDR2005-05022 (1 OF 2)i 0, ,To X; � /j.Or,r ._.r.: Ili , . l I� !I'OS'o4 0010 F Tj r. % -)7 z./ Ae tv 7 w0000p Jw A C.APAAM V or "Clearwater Planning Department 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, Florida 33756 Telephone: 727- 562 -4567 Fax: 727 - 562 -4865 ❑ SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION ❑ SUBMIT 14 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION - Plans and application are required to be collated, stapled, and folded into sets ❑ SUBMIT FIRE PRELIMARY SITE PLAN: $200.00 ❑ SUBMIT APPLICATION FEE $ CASE #: RECEIVED BY (staff initials): DATE RECEIVED: * NOTE: 15 TOTAL SETS OF INFORMATION REQUIRED (APPLICATIONS PLUS SITE PLAN SETS) ORIGII` & RECrrM 'AN 07 2000 PMNING DE MWENZ CITY M CLEA.0,NATER FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project (Revised 04/24/2007) -PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT- A. APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4- 202.A) APPLICANT NAME: Salt Blo A 57, 'L.L C. ..................................... . ........... ' . ...... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I ........... . . .... . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . : . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ............ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ............... . .. . ........ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ...... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . MAILING ADDRESS: 1001 E. Atlantic Avenue, Suite 202, Delray„ Bea_ch PHONE NUMBER: (561) 21..... ,.._.._FL . . . . . . . . . . . . . ........... . . . . .................... . ........... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ................ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ....... -1.1. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0 FAX NUMBER: (561) 276 -1563 . _ . ............................... _... _ ............................... 1ZRbLAkA1B2R Contact: Mark Walsh EMAIL: B. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4- 202.A) proposed cost of improvement PROJECT NAME: Clearwater Beach Vacation PROJECT VALUATION: $ 1-- 01,59_ 3 _ ,.6_ _2_.0. _ . STREET ADDRESS l�wne- rshi p P ro ect - -- ..._..._- - 43-0-- Gu3-fvi�w- B�i-evs•rzi._ _..___ -- - -�. ___ _ _- _ - -. _ -- - - -- - - - - -- - .- PARCEL NUMBER(S): PARCEL SIZE (acres): 2.45 acre! __ PARCEL SIZE (square feet): 106,504 sq . ft. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: See ' Exh bit "A" attached __.. PROPOSED USE(S): DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST: Specifically identify the request (include number of units or square footage of non - residential use and all requested code deviations; e.g. reduction in required number of parking spaces, specific use, etc.) t accommodation units See Exhibit "B" C: \Documents and Settings \derek.ferguson\ Desktop\ planningforms _0707\Comprehensive Infill Project (FLD) 04- 24- 07.doc Page 1 of 8 , LLP 10 DOES THIS APPLICATION INVOLVE THE TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGIi'IS (f'DR), A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, OR A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED (CERTIFIED) SITE PLAN? YES _ NO _ (if yes, attach a copy of the applicable documents) C. PROOF OF OWNERSHIP: (Code Section 4- 202.A.5) ❑ SUBMIT A COPY OF THE TITLE INSURANCE POLICY, DEED TO THE PROPERTY OR SIGN AFFIDAVIT, ATTESTING OWNERSHIP (see page 7) D. ❑ 1. WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 3- 913.A) Provide complete responses to the six (6) GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA — Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail: The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. See Exhibit "B" attached for responses to Criteria 1 through 6. 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use. 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the_ immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. ORIGH W 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hoursAFAMMmpacts, on adjacent properties. SAN 07 2000 PLANNNG DEM7 TNT CITY Or- CLEF MATER C: \Documents and Settings \derek.ferguson \Desktop \planningforms 0707\Comprehensive Infill Project (FLD) 04- 24- 07.doc Page 2 of 8 • • WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project Criteria) ❑ Provide complete responses to the six (6) COMPREHENSIVE INFILL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT CRITERIA — Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail: 1. The development or redevelopment is otherwise impractical without deviations from the use and /or development standards set forth in this zoning district. See Exhibit "B" attached for responses to Criteria 1 through 6. 2. The development or redevelopment will be consistent with the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan, as well as with the general purpose, intent and basic planning objectives of this Code, and with the intent and purpose of this zoning district WK, 0W d It 3. The development or redevelopment will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of surrounr (,�" s. JAN V % piat,1tg1pGDt";F' �61�ENT 4. Adjoining properties will not suffer substantial detriment as a result of the proposed development. CITY or CLE ,9;NATER 5. The proposed use shall otherwise be permitted by the underlying future land use category, be compatible with adjacent land uses, will not substantially alter the essential- use characteristics of the neighborhood; and shall demonstrate compliance with one or more of the following objectives: a. The proposed use is permitted in this zoning district as a minimum standard, flexible standard or flexible development use; b. The proposed use would be a significant economic contributor to the City's economic base by diversifying the local economy or by creating jobs; c. The development proposal accommodates the expansion or redevelopment of an existing economic contributor; d. The proposed use provides for the provision of affordable housing; e. The proposed use provides for development or redevelopment in an area,that is characterized by other similar development and when; a land use plan amendment and rezoning would result in a spot land use or zoning designation; or f. The proposed use provides for the development of a new and /or preservation of a working waterfront use. 6. Flexibility with regard to use, lot width, required setbacks, height and off - street parking are justified based on demonstrated compliance with all of the following design objectives: a. The proposed development will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of the surrounding properties for uses permitted in this zoning district; b. The proposed development complies with applicable design guidelines adopted by the City; c. The design, scale and intensity of the proposed development supports the established or emerging character of an area; d. In order to form a cohesive, visually interesting and attractive appearances the proposed development incorporates a substantial number of the following design elements: ❑ Changes in horizontal building planes; ❑ Use of architectural details such as columns, cornices, stringcourses, pilasters, porticos, balconies, railings, awnings, etc.; ❑ Variety in materials, colors and textures; ❑ Distinctive fenestration patterns; ❑ Building stepbacks; and ❑ Distinctive roofs forms. e. The proposed development provides for appropriate buffers, enhanced landscape design and appropriate distances between buildings. C:\Documents and Settings \derek.ferguson\ Desktop\ pianningforms 0707\Comprehensive Infill Project (FLD) 04- 24- 07.doc Page 3 of 87 i E. STORMWATER PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteria Manual and 4- 202.A.21) ❑ .A STORMWATER NARRATIVE MUST BE SUBMITTED WITH ALL APPLICATIONS. All applications that involve addition or modification of impervious surface, including buildings, must include a stormwater plan that demonstrates compliance with the City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteria manual. A reduction in impervious surface area does not qualify as an exemption to this requirement. ❑ If a plan is not required, the narrative shall provide an explanation as to why the site is exempt. Cl At a minimum, the STORMWATER PLAN shall include the following; ❑ Existing topography extending 50 feet beyond all property lines; ❑ Proposed grading including finished floor elevations of all structures; ❑ All adjacent streets and municipal stone systems; ❑ Proposed stormwater detention/retention area including top of bank, toe of slope and outlet control structure; ❑ A narrative describing the proposed stormwater control plan including all calculations and data necessary to demonstrate compliance with the City manual. ❑ Proposed stormwater detention /retention area including top of bank, toe of slope and outlet control structure; ❑ Signature and seal of Florida Registered Professional Engineer on all plans and calculations. ❑ COPY OF PERMIT INQUIRY LETTER OR SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT (SWFWMD) PERMIT SUBMITTAL (SWFWMD approval is required prior to issuance of City Building Permit), if applicable ❑ ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF STORMWATER PLAN REQUIREMENTS (Applicant must initial one of the following): X Stormwater plan as noted above is included Stormwater plan is not required and explanation narrative is attached. At a minimum, a grading plan and finished floor elevations shall be provided. CAUTION — IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A STORMWATER PLAN AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 562 -4750. F. SUPPLEMENTAL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 4- 202.A) ❑ SIGNED AND SEALED SURVEY (including legal description of property) — One original and 14 copies; ❑ TREE SURVEY (including existing trees on site and within 25' of the adjacent site, by species, size (DBH 4" or greater), and location, including drip lines and indicating trees to, be removed) — please design around the existing trees; ❑ TREE INVENTORY; prepared by a "certified arborist ", of all trees 4" DBH or greater, reflecting size, canopy (drip lines) and condition of such trees; • LOCATION MAP OF THE PROPERTY; • PARKING DEMAND STUDY in conjunction with a request to make deviations to the parking standards (ie. Reduce number of spaces). Prior to the submittal of this application, the methodology of such study shall be approved by the Community Development Coordinator and shall be in accordance with accepted traffic engineering principles. The findings of the study will be used in determining whether or not deviations to the parking standards are approved; • GRADING PLAN, as applicable; • PRELIMINARY PLAT, as required (Note: Building permits will not be issued until evidence of recording a final plat is provided); • COPY OF RECORDED PLAT, as applicable; ORIG i, K. JAN 07 2008 PLANNIaC— DEPA rME-!NY. C: \Documents and Settings \derek.ferguson\ Desktop\ planningfonns- 0707\Comprehensive Infill Project (FLD) 0424- 07.doc Page 4 of 8 G. SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4- 202.A) SITE PLAN with the following information (not to exceed 24"x 36 "): Index sheet referencing individual sheets included in package; North arrow; Engineering bar scale (minimum scale one inch equals 50 feet), and date prepared; All dimensions; Footprint and size of all EXISTING buildings and structures; Footprint and size of all PROPOSED buildings and structures; All required setbacks; _ All existing and proposed points of access;_ _ All required sight triangles; Identification of environmentally unique areas, such as watercourses, wetlands, tree masses, and specimen trees, including description and location of understory, ground cover vegetation and wildlife habitats, etc; Location of all public and private easements; _ Location of all street rights -of -way within and adjacent to the site; Location of existing public and private utilities, including fire hydrants, storm and sanitary sewer lines, manholes and lift stations, gas and water lines; All parking spaces, driveways, loading areas and vehicular use areas; Depiction by shading or crosshatching of all required parking lot interior landscaped areas; Location of all solid waste containers, recycling or trash handling areas and outside mechanical equipment and all required screening {per Section 3- 201(D)(i) and Index #701); Location of all landscape material; Location of all onsite and offsite storm -water management facilities; Location of all outdoor lighting fixtures; and Location of all existing and proposed sidewalks. SITE DATA TABLE for existing, required, and proposed development, in written /tabular form: Land area in square feet and acres; Number of EXISTING dwelling units; Number of PROPOSED dwelling units; _ Gross floor area devoted to each use; Parking spaces: total number, presented in tabular form with the . _ number of required spaces; Total paved area, including all paved parking spaces & driveways, expressed in square feet & percentage of the paved vehicular area; Official records book and page numbers of all existing utility _ easement; Building and structure heights; Impermeable surface ratio (I.S.R.); and Floor area ratio (F.A.R.) for all nonresidential uses. EXISTING REQUIRED PROPOSED ❑ REDUCED COLOR SITE PLAN to scale (8 Y2 X 11); FOR DEVELOPMENTS OVER ONE ACRE, provide the following additional information on site plan: One -foot contours or spot elevations on site; Offsite elevations if required to evaluate the proposed stormwater management for the parcel. e ' CD ; All open space areas; Location of all earth or water retaining walls and earth berms; �p r} SAN 0 4. 2008 Lot lines and building lines (dimensioned); PLA.v +4ING DW. NEW' Streets and drives (dimensioned); ^r9ax1b.�97° '. i N _ Building and structural setbacks (dimensioned); - i. .• O i _ Structural overhangs; C:\Documents and Settings\derek.ferguson\ Desktop\ planningforms _0707\Comprehensive Infill Project (FLD) 04- 24- 07.doc Page 5 of 8 K 0 H. LANDSCAPING PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4- 1102.A) 0 19 Im LANDSCAPE PLAN with the following information (not to exceed 24" x 36'x: _ All existing and proposed structures; Names of abutting streets; Drainage and retention areas including swales, side slopes and bottom elevations; Delineation and dimensions of all required perimeter landscape buffers; Sight visibility triangles; Delineation and dimensions of all parking areas including landscaping islands and curbing; Existing trees on -site and immediately adjacent to the site, by species, size and locations, including driplines (as indicated on required tree survey); Location, size, and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, indicated by a key relating to the plant . schedule; - Plant schedule with a key (symbol or label) indicating the size, description, specifications, quantities, and spacing requirements of all existing and proposed landscape materials, including botanical and common names; Typical planting details for trees, palms, shrubs and ground cover plants including instructions, soil mixes, backfilling, mulching and protective measures; Interior landscaping areas hatched and/or shaded and labeled and interior landscape coverage, expressing in both square feet and percentage covered; Conditions of a previous development approval (e.g. conditions imposed by the Community Development Board); Irrigation notes. REDUCED COLOR LANDSCAPE PLAN to scale (8 %X 11); COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM application, as applicable. Landscape associated with the Comprehensive Landscape Program shall exceed minimum Code requirements to offset the areas where minimum Code will not be met. I. BUILDING ELEVATION PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4- 202.A.23) ❑ BUILDING ELEVATION DRAWINGS —with the following information; All sides of all buildings; Dimensioned; Colors (provide one full sized set of colored elevations); Materials; Sight visibility triangles; ❑ REDUCED BUILDING ELEVATIONS — same as above to scale on 8'/2 X 11. ORIGI , IAN 0 7 2000 "Y OF CL fey' ATE J. SIGNAGE: (Division 19. SIGNS /.Section 3 -1806) ❑ All EXISTING freestanding and attached signs; Provide photographs and dimensions (area, height, etc.), indicate whether they will be removed or to remain. ❑ All PROPOSED freestanding and attached signs; Provide details including location, size, height, colors, materials and drawing; freestanding signs shall include the street address (numerals) ❑ Comprehensive Sign Program application, as applicable (separate application and fee required). ❑ Reduced signage proposal (8'/2 X 11) (color), if submitting Comprehensive Sign Program application. C: \Documents and Settings\ derek .ferguson\Desktop \planningfonns 0707\Comprehensive Infill Project (FLD) 04- 24- 07.doc Page 6 of 8 K. 1T: ORIGI RED K. TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY: (Section 4- 202.A.13 and 4- 801.C) V I LUec PLANIN"NG DEPARWIP C3 Include if required by the Traffic Operations Manager or his/her designee or if the proposed development: CITY M CLEAR WATR • Will degrade the acceptable level of service for any roadway as adopted in the Comprehensive Plan. i • Will generate 100 or more new vehicle directional trips per hour and /or 1000 or more new vehicle trips per day. • Will affect a nearby roadway segment and /or intersection with five (5) reportable accidents within the prior twelve (12) month period or that is on the City's annual list of most hazardous intersections. Trip generation shall be based on the most recent edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineer's (ITE) Trip General Manual. The Traffic Impact Study must be prepared in accordance with a " Scoping Meeting" held with the Traffic Operations Manager and the Planning Department's Development Review Manager or their designee (727 - 562 -4750) Refer to Section 4 -801 C of the Community -Development Code for exceptions to this requirement. ❑ Acknowledgement of traffic impact study requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following): Traffic Impact Study is included. The study must include a summary table of pre- and post - development levels of service for all roadway legs and each turning movement at all intersections identified in the Scoping Meeting. X Traffic Impact Study is not required. per enclosed narrative CAUTION — IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 562- 4750. L. FIRE FLOW CALCULATIONS/ WATER STUDY: Provide Fire Flow Calculations. Water Study by a FIRE PROTECTION ENGINEER to assure an adequate water supply is available and to determine if any upgrades are required by the developer due to the impact of this project. The water supply must be able to support the needs of. any required fire sprinkler, standpipe and /or fire pump. If a fire pump is required the water supply must be able to supply 150% of its rated capacity. Compliance with the 2004 Florida Fire Prevention Code to include NFPA 13, MFPA 14, NFPA 20, NFPA 291, and MFPA 1142 (Annex H) is required. ❑ Acknowledgement of fire flow calculations/water study requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following): i X Fire Flow Calculations/Water Study is included. Fire Flow Calculations/Water Study is not required. CAUTION - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A FIRE FLOW CALCULATIONS/ WATER STUDY AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Fire Prevention Department at (727) 562 -4334. M. SIGNATURE: K. I, the undersigned, acknowledge that all representations, made in this application are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge and authorize City representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application. Signature of property owner or representative E. D. Armstrong III STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS Swgrr� to and subs rib d before me this 9,14 65-y of A.D. 20 07—to me and /or by E. D. ArmstrongIII , who is personally knownXl= 3bl*Axxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 7frMl1�4�I4S4c —Wo—t,% p u b I i dl , My commission expires: Commission # DD449633 CADocuments and Settings \derek.ferguson\ Desktop\ planningforms_070AComprehensive Infill ��� %f.®umber 2, 2009 Page 7 of 8 ","°"". kK Woaesaora • N. AFFIDAVIT TO AUTHORIZE AGENT: I] Provide names of all property owners on deed — PRINT full names: SALT BLOCK 57, L.L.C., a Utah lindted.liability company 2. That (I am /we are) the owner(s) and record title holder(s) of the following described property (address or general location): 430 South Gulfview Parcel... iD #.. 07/29/_15/52380 /000/0330. ... .......... 3. That this property constitutes the property for which a request for a: (describe request) Flexible development approval for a ccmprehensive infill.redevelopanent project and transfers of develo�amrit rights to the property as a receiver site. 4. Th the undersigned (has /have a pointed anti (does /do appoint: .D. A mstrong I , Esquire and _Johnson, ..... Pope., ,,BOkor.,.....Ruppel .. &......Burns.,.... T T P......... ................................ ........... ............. ... as (his /their) agent(s) to execute any petitions or other documents necessary to affect such petition; 5. That this affidavit has been executed to induce the City of Clearwater, Florida to consider and act on the above described property; 6. That site visits to the property are necessary by City representatives in order to process this application and the owner authorizes City representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application; 7. That (1 /we), the undersigned authority, hereby certify that the foregoing is true and correct. SALT 57, L L. Property Owner Prop rt By ' 4a .......... - ........ ....................... A ........ . .................. ...... ...... ._- Property Owner Prc��erf�cl�wnr?r STATE OF FLORIDA, 2 COUNTY OF PWE� 1� A& Pq(M ¢0.Ck Before me the undersigned, an officer duly commissioned by the laws of the State of Florida, on this * eC Vk day of ' December 2007 ......... . personally _app eared �`!,('i `(� In1.Q4..1 S%� who having been first duly sworn Deposes and says that he /she fully understands the contents of the affidavit that he /she signed. *as Maitim e,r of Salt Block 57, L.L.C. Notary Public Signature Notary Seal /Stamp My Commission Expires: 77.7 31 20.0 B DEBORAH HOWARD i . <P0.Y Pu� sl� -- : Notary Public - Stab of Fbrida ' fNy CommWon Expit a Jul 31, 2099 's X Commission / DD 423511 '�•�,°;� Bonded By Nations Notary Awn. C: \Documents and Settings \derek.ferguson\ Desktop\ planningforms _0707\Comprehensive Infdl- Project;(FI-D) 04- 24- 07.doc Page 8 of 8'F I . *` 0 EXHIBIT "A" 430 SOUTH GULMEW A TRACT OF LAND CONSISTING OF LOTS 33,34 AND 35 AND PART OF LOT 36 OF LLOYD- WHITE- SKINNER SUBDIVISION, ACCORDING TO MAP OR PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 13, PAGES 12 AND 13 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA AND LANDS AND SUBMERGED LANDS LYING BETWEEN AND SOUTHERLY, SOUTHWESTERLY OR WESTERLY OF THE MEAN HIGH WATER MARK AND THE BULKHEAD LINE DESCRIBED .IN AND SET FORTH IN TRUSTEES OF THE INTERNAL IMPROVEMENT FUND OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA DISCLAIMER NO. 22310, AS RECORDED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 765, PAGE 542, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA, SAID TRACT BEING DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: FROM THE NORTHERN MOST CORNER OF SAID LOT 33, RUN SOUTH 77° 41' 16" WEST, ALONG THE NORTHWESTERLY BOUNDARY OF SAID LOT 33 AND THE SOUTHWESTERLY EXTENSION THEREOF, A DISTANCE OF 400.0 FEET TO A POINT ON THE BULKHEAD LINE DESCRIBED ABOVE; RUN THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID BULKHEAD LINE ALONG A CURVE TO THE LEFT (RADIUS - '1247.0 FEET) AN ARC DISTANCE OF 296.79 FEET, (CHORD BEARING SOUTH 19* 07'51" EAST); RUN THENCE NORTH 680 55'27' EAST A DISTANCE OF 402.14 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTHEASTERLY BOUNDARY OF SAID LOT 36; RUN THENCE NORTHWESTERLY ALONG THE NORTHEASTERLY BOUNDARIES OF SAID LOTS 36, 35, 34 AND 33, WHICH LINE IS A CURVE TO THE RIGHT (RADIUS - 847.0 FEET) AN ARC DISTANCE OF 235.76 FEET.(CHORD - 235.0 FEET, CHORD BEARING - NORTH 20" 17''10. WEST) TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. BEING THE SAME PROPERTY AS: A TRACT OF LAND CONSISTING OF LOTS 33,34 AND 35 AND PART OF LOT 36 OF LLOYD- WHITE- SKINNER SUBDIVISION, ACCORDING TO THE MAP OR PLAT THEREOF, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 13, PAGES 12 AND 13 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA, AND LANDS AND SUBMERGED LANDS LYING BETWEEN AND SOUTHERLY, SOUTHWESTERLY OR WESTERLY OF THE MEAN HIGH WATER MARK AND THE BULKHEAD LINE DESCRIBED IN AND SET FORTH IN TRUSTEES OF THE INTERNAL IMPROVEMENT FUND OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA DISCLAIMER NO. 22310, AS RECORDED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 765, PAGE 542, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA, SAID TRACT BEING DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGIN AT AN IRON PIN AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT 33 AND THE WEST RIGHT -OF -WAY MARGIN OF GULF VIEW BOULEVARD, SAID POINT BEING THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; SAID POINT BEING THE PC OF A CURVE TO THE LEFT HAVING A RADIUS OF 847.00 FEET AND AN ARC DISTANCE OF 235.76 FEET, THENCE RUN ALONG SAID CURVE TO THE LEFT AND ALONG THE WEST RIGHT -OF -WAY MARGIN OF GULF VIEW BOULEVARD A CHORD BEARING OF SOUTH 200 17'10" EAST AND A CHORD DISTANCE OF 235.00 FEET TO AN IRON PIN; THENCE RUN SOUTH 68" 55' 27" WEST FOR A DISTANCE OF 402.14 FEET TO AN IRON PIN, SAID POINT BEING THE PC OF A CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A RADIUS OF 1247.00 FEET AND AN ARC DISTANCE OF 296.79 FEET; THENCE RUN ALONG SAID CURVE TO THE RIGHT A CHORD BEARING OF NORTH 190 07' 51" WEST AND A CHORD DISTANCE OF 296.09 FEET TO AN IRON PIN; THENCE RUN NORTH 77° 41'16" EAST FOR A DISTANCE OF . 400.00 FEET TO A POINT AND BACK TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. ORIGNX pLAN%WG DE4oMEN1 CITY Of OL ATER. 0 0 EXHIBIT "B" TO FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION FOR COMPREHENSIVE INFILL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT Salt Block 57, L.L.C. 430 South Gulfview Boulevard Section B. Description of Request Request 'AN 0 7 2008 PLANNING DEPKZ1T', 1FNr The Applicant and property owner, Salt Block 57, L.L.C., proposes to r0I M �pjEp property with 230 overnight accommodation units. The subject property is the former Adam's Mark hotel site, located at 430 South Gulfview Boulevard. Specifically, the Applicant seeks flexible development approval of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, in accordance with the plans submitted with this application, including relief as follows: a. Termination of Status of Nonconformity for density 217 overnight accommodation units as established by FLD2005 -01005 and FLD2005- 05047, where 93 rooms (1.87 acres at 50 units /acre) are allowed by the current zoning (Tourist) and land use designation (RFH); b. Transfers of development rights (8 residential dwelling units, being converted to 13 overnight accommodation units) previously transferred to the site from three sender sites pursuant to TDR2005- 05022, including four dwelling units from 557 and 579 Cyprus Avenue, one dwelling unit from 625 -627 Bay Esplanade and three dwelling units from 667 Bay Esplanade, under the provisions of Section 4 -1402; c. An increase of the maximum building height from 35' to 150' (to roof deck) to allow two proposed towers, one with a height of 150' -0" to roof deck and one with a height of 99' -4" to roof deck; d. Relief from CCCL setback to allow building located 6' landward of the CCCL and sidewalk located 0 feet from the CCCL on the north side (where 10' is required) and building located 8' landward of the CCCL and sidewalk located zero feet from the CCCL on the west side (where 20' is required); e. A front (east) setback along Gulfview Boulevard for structures other than buildings of 0' to pavement, where 0' to 15' is required by Code; f. A side (north) setback for structures other than buildings of 0' to sidewalk, where 0'to 10' is required by Code; 0 0 g. A side (south) setback for structures other than buildings of 3' to sidewalk and 0' to trash holding slab where 0' to 10' is required by Code; h. A rear (west) setback for structures other than buildings of 6' from seawall to sidewalk where 0' to 20' is required by Code; i. Direct access to an arterial street, South Gulfview Boulevard; and j. Approval of a two -year development order. History The property is the site of the former Adam's Mark Hotel which was built in 1975 and was a landmark at the southerly end of Clearwater Beach for almost 30 years. The hotel closed its doors after sustaining damage from Hurricane Jeanne in September, 2004, and on April 19, 2005, the Community Development Board approved a termination of nonconforming status as to density and granted flexible development approval for height (155'), setbacks, reduced parking and other existing nonconformities in order to allow the hotel to be renovated (FLD2005- 01005). The hotel renovation never occurred and site was purchased on June 3, 2005 by Indigo Beach, L.L.C., then known as TW /Beach Residences — Clearwater, L.L.C. ( "TW "). On August 16, 2005, the owner received approval of termination of non - conforming status as to density (217 hotel rooms), transfers of development rights and flexible development approval as to increased height and other development parameters in order to allow redevelopment of the site with 112 residential condominiums and 78 condominium -hotel units (FLD2005- 05047/TDR2005- 05022). Anticipating the approved redevelopment, the owner demolished the Adam's Mark on October 8, 2005. The City approved several minor revisions and granted extensions to the approved site plan /development order; however, changes in the real estate market and changes in ownership have caused the Applicant to modify the proposed use of the property to provide for overnight accommodations. Proposed Use The Applicant proposes to redevelop the site with a vacation /interval ownership project consisting of 230 overnight accommodation units. Buyers purchase a one - fifty- second fee simple interest in a unit and receive a deed as a tenant -in- common in the unit. Each buyer has the right to use his time in increments as small as a day and as large as a week. The property would include one poolside restaurant and bar. The property's guest services will encourage guests to patronize local eateries and entertainment activities. ORIGINAL REC 5�N 0 7 2000 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY Of CLE�`A. -ATER. V, Section D. Written Submittal Requirements General Applicability Criteria: ORYGYN, REa;'Et'? JAN 0 7 2000 PLANNING DEP&WENT CITY or CLEK. HATER 1) The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. West: The property is bounded on the west by the Gulf of Mexico. North: The adjacent property to the north is the public beach and City -owned property, including a public parking lot, which is currently being renovated with Beach Walk improvements. The proposed development incorporates and extends the Beach Walk improvements into the project, through extension of a 10' -wide shell finish concrete sidewalk, use of decorative pavers and planting of Medjool Date Palms. East: The adjacent property to the east is an 'area of smaller mixed uses, including hotel, condominium, retail and restaurants. It is anticipated that this area will also be undergoing renovations, as are encouraged by Beach by Design's vision of Beach Walk. The height of the three -story base of the building is compatible with and reflects the scale of the buildings to the east across Gulfview Boulevard as those buildings are generally 4 stories. South: The adjacent property to south is occupied by 440 West condominiums, which are 157' in height and of similar scale than the proposed project. The scale, bulk, coverage and density of the proposed project are in keeping with the Design Guidelines set forth in Beach by Design for projects including approvals of transfers of density and increased building height. Please see the more detailed discussion of these criteria in response to Comprehensive Infill Criteria No. 6.b. in this exhibit. 2) The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. The proposed project will enhance this area of the beach in a number of ways, including: (1) Superior architectural design, including a tiered effect along Gulfview Boulevard, and lush landscaping which will visually enhance the neighborhood; (2) Construction which meets current building Codes; (3) Excess parking, adequate stacking space and loading area, in order to eliminate any traffic congestion at the site and eliminate potential off -site parking in public lots. The parking is designed to accommodate staff, 3 i • guests, and overnight visitors, as well as provide adequate space for taxis and airport shuttles; (4) Beach Walk improvements incorporated into the site provide for a better pedestrian flow along South Gulfview than what currently exists; (5) Property value will significantly increase; and (6) The transient occupants of the proposed project will be potential clientele of nearby restaurants and other businesses. 3) The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use. The construction of the Beach Walk improvements by the Applicant, including 10'- wide shell finish concrete sidewalks, will improve the pedestrian flow and safety along South Gulfview and the north side of the property. A fence will be constructed along the seawall and northerly and southerly property line for safety purposes. Traffic congestion will be minimized as described in Criteria 4 below. With regard to health, safety and welfare, the proposed development and structure will comply as required with applicable codes including the Florida Building Code, the Life Safety Code and the Florida Fire Prevention Code. Fire Department Access shall comply with NFPA 1 Chapter 18 with Gulf View Boulevard serving as the access road, and more specifically that the access road will extend to within 50' of a single exterior door per 18.2.2.2, an approved route around the exterior of the structure measures not more than 450' from the access road and the building is equipped with sprinklers per 18.2.2.2.3.1 and 18.2.2.3.2. 4) The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. The Applicant has submitted with this application a narrative entitled "Review of Need for a. Traffic Study" prepared by Roy E. Chapman, P.E., Florida Design Consultants, Inc. which concludes that a traffic study should not be required. � There are a number of ways in which the project has been designed to minimize traffic congestion on South Gulfview Boulevard: Uj 0 32 2.. � © (1) The entrance to the parking garage will have 150' of stacking space, using ;:-: the drop -off lane. This will allow adequate room for stacking of vehicles entering 0 or exiting the garage so as not to interfere with traffic flow on South Gulfview. Additionally, vehicles can use the drop -off area in the front to pull off of the street and onto the Property to avoid backups onto Gulfview. (2) 178 parking spaces in excess of the minimum Code requirement are provided so guests and overnight visitors will not have to wait for spaces or circle the garage looking for a parking space, therefore allowing traffic to flow smoothly into the parking garage off the public street. Due to seasonal congestion on the beach and the lack to date of new public parking facilities, the Applicant desires to insure that all parking demands of the project can be accommodated on site. 4 Therefore, the building's design provides for more parking than required by Code to respond to this concern. [408 spaces provided, where 230 spaces (1 space /unit) are required]. (3) Three parking spaces have been designated on the site plan as taxi spaces. There is also a drop -off lane in front of the building. (4) As shown on the proposed site plan, there is a loading /unloading area provided at the southeast corner of the site. This area will be used for trash pick- up and may be used by large delivery vehicles so they will not block traffic on South Gulfview. Generally, due to the use of the Property, smaller - scaled delivery vehicles will use the drop -off area at the front of the Property and parking garage. (5) The garage is designed so the resort can provide valet parking service for some guests. 5) The proposed development is consistent with the community. character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. The property is located within and at the northern end of the "Clearwater Pass District" of Clearwater Beach. The project will function as a southerly "bookend" to the "Beach Walk District." The project is also consistent with the community character of the "Clearwater Pass District" which Beach by Design describes as an area of mixed uses including high rise condos and resort hotels. As to the immediate vicinity, to the west is the Gulf of Mexico and the parcel to the north is the public beach and area being renovated by the City of Clearwater with Beach Walk improvements. The Applicant is incorporating the Beach Walk improvements into the property and providing improvements in the City right -of- way to the north of the property as envisioned by Beach by Design, including a 10' -wide shell finish concrete sidewalk and Medjool palms. The parcel to the south is occupied by 440 West Condominiums, having a height of 157'. This development was built in 1975 and co- existed for 30 years with the 155' high Adam's Mark hotel. The proposed project is of a superior architectural design to the Adam's Mark building and incorporates Beach by Design guidelines therefore enhancing the 440 West property. To the east are mixed retail and overnight accommodation uses. This area is also expected to be affected and improved by Beach Walk. Guests of the proposed project may be prospective clientele of the mixed uses to the east. 6) The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts on adjacent properties. ORIGINAL REC21W 5 SAN 07 2000 PM, 111MG DEPARTMENT CITY or n 1:AW,Wwrr,, The proposed redevelopment project will improve the visual appeal at this south end of the public beach. The architectural style integrates a contemporary coastal architectural design, which is appropriate and aesthetically pleasing for this beachfront property. Excess parking spaces, adequate loading /unloading spaces and sufficient stacking space at the entrance to the parking garage will keep vehicles off of the Beach Walk area which will enhance and encourage the flow of pedestrians from the beach to the site or other properties to the south. The pool area will be located in the middle of the property between the two towers and on the fourth floor level, such that noise or visual distraction will not be a factor to the adjoining residential condominiums to the south. Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project Criteria: 1. The development or redevelopment is otherwise impractical without deviations from the use and /or development standards set forth in this zoning district. The development order approving the termination of non - conforming status as to the density of 217 overnight accommodation units (FLD2005- 05047) is currently in effect. The proposed deviations from Code, which are discussed in detail below, are necessary and minimal deviations to Code without which the project cannot be constructed at this location. The Applicant has designed the proposed redevelopment project to comply with Beach by Design guidelines to the fullest extent possible. The proposed redevelopment of this site into a resort use is highly visible from Beach Walk and is an integral part of the City's vision of Clearwater Beach as set forth in Beach by Design. Height The request for 150' when 100' is allowed by Code is consistent with the Design Guidelines of Beach by Design which provide for increased height in the event of a transfer of development rights to the property. This application includes a companion transfer of development rights application for 13 overnight accommodation units (equivalent to 8 residential dwelling units), which were transferred to the site from three other eligible sites on Clearwater Beach. The transfer was previously made pursuant to TDR2005- 05022. There is a reasonable relationship between the height increase for the condominium and the 13 transferred units based upon other cases recommended for approval by staff and actually approved by CDB consistent with Beach by Design. There are 50 units located above 100', many of which are the luxury suites, which are the larger, more upscale units. ORIGINAL RE "" 6 SAN 0 7 2000 PLANNNG DEMUIUEWl' CITY Or- CLMMATER. ! �. Setbacks The relief sought from setbacks is specific to setbacks to pavement or structures other than buildings and, as to the easterly and northerly boundaries, is required due to the incorporation of the Beach Walk improvements into the site and the location of the CCCL. These setback deviations will not be visually apparent due to the incorporation of the Beach Walk improvements into the site. To the extent that there are projections on higher levels that reduce the setbacks, those projections are permitted pursuant to Code section 3 -908. Relief from CCCL Setback The property is unique in that the CCCL wraps around the site and affects both the westerly and northerly boundaries. Although the structural setbacks are adequate and do not appear obtrusive, it is not possible to meet the setback requirement from the CCCL around the entire site due to the angle at which the CCCL traverses the property. No part of any buildings or structures are located seaward of the CCCL. Access to an Arteri The property is addressed from South Gulfview and the Adam's Mark hotel has always had direct access from South Gulfview. The proposed access drive location has been modified slightly in connection with the redevelopment of the site but is in substantially the same location as access has existed for 30 years. There is no other viable access. The north side of the site is designed to connect and incorporate the Beach Walk improvements. Two -Year Development Order The Applicant requests a two -year development order due to market conditions. 2. The development or redevelopment will be consistent with the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan, as well as with the general purpose, intent and basic planning objectives of this Code, and with the intent and purpose of this zoning district. Overnight accommodations are allowed in the "Tourist" zoning district. Primary uses in the "Resort Facilities High" land use category are "high density residential /overnight accommodation." The site is located in the Clearwater Pass District of Beach by Design which is characterized as "mixed use — high rise condominiums, resort hotels, recreation and tourist and neighborhood serving uses." 3. The development or redevelopment will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of surrounding properties. ORIGINAL. 7 J,4 ,6 7 2009 PP.AMIMC N-A,OF�E/'I6 CITY Or- CLE *ATF4� • •. The proposed project is compatible with the neighborhood, as is more particularly discussed in General Applicability Criteria 1 and Comprehensive Infill Criteria 4 below, and will not impede other development. The improvement of the site will pave the way for future redevelopment and set an example for the style of quality architecture envisioned by Beach by Design. 4. Adjoining properties will not suffer substantial detriment as a result of the proposed development. West: The property is bounded on the west by the Gulf of Mexico. North: The adjacent property to the north is the public beach and City -owned property which will be renovated with Beach Walk improvements including public parking. The proposed development incorporates and extends the Beach Walk improvements into the project. East: The adjacent property to the east is an area of smaller mixed uses, including retail and restaurants. It is anticipated that this area will also undergo renovations, as are encouraged by Beach by Design's vision of Beach Walk. South: The adjacent property to south is occupied by 440 West condominiums, which are 157' in height and of similar scale than the proposed project. 440 West condominiums co- existed with the Adam's Mark hotel for its entire existence of 30 years. The extension of Beach Walk in front of the property will give 440 West residents easy pedestrian access to the north and the public beach access. Elimination of traffic congestion as previously described will improve traffic flow along South Gulfview for 440 West residents. The Applicant has included a screen wall, security fence and landscaping buffer along the southerly property line in response to the requests of the 440 West residents. 5. The proposed use shall otherwise be permitted by the underlying future land use category, be compatible with adjacent land uses, will not substantially alter the essential use characteristics of the neighborhood; and shall demonstrate compliance with one or more of the following objectives: a. The proposed use is permitted in this zoning district as a minimum standard, flexible standard or flexible development use; b. The proposed use would be a significant economic contributor to the City's economic base by diversifying the local economy or by creating jobs; c. The development proposal accommodates the expansion or redevelopment of an existing economic contributor; d. The proposed use provides for the provision of affordable housing; 0 wUj N m WE a. The proposed use is permitted in this zoning district as a minimum standard, flexible standard or flexible development use; b. The proposed use would be a significant economic contributor to the City's economic base by diversifying the local economy or by creating jobs; c. The development proposal accommodates the expansion or redevelopment of an existing economic contributor; d. The proposed use provides for the provision of affordable housing; 0 • e. The proposed use provides for development or redevelopment in an area that is characterized by other similar development and where a land use plan amendment and rezoning would result in a spot land use or zoning designation; or f. The proposed use provides for the development of a new, and/or preservation of a working waterfront use. The proposed use meets several of these criteria. Overnight accommodations are permitted by the "Resort Facilities High" land use category and in the "Tourist" zoning district as a minimum standard, flexible standard and flexible use. Redevelopment of Clearwater Beach is a significant economic contributor to the City. Since 2004, the property has not contributed to the economy as it was closed to guests. This proposed use is an economic contributor by increasing the number of tourists to Clearwater Beach and encouraging patronization of local businesses. The proposed project will generate new jobs in the City of Clearwater. The proposed use as overnight accommodations is characteristic of the neighborhood, as the Adam's Mark Hotel located at this site was a focal point of the southerly end of Clearwater Beach for many years. As previously discussed in General Applicability Criteria 1 and Comprehensive Infill Criteria 4 the proposed project is compatible with the surrounding uses. 6. Flexibility with regard to use, lot width, required setbacks, height and off - street parking are justified based on demonstrated compliance with all of the following design objectives: LU LU a. The proposed development will not impede the normal and orderly Q, development and improvement of the surrounding properties for C= o uses permitted in this zoning district. N CD ( The proposed use is a use permitted in the Tourist zoning district without this a pp roval. Surroundin g properties are already developed. Public property to the north is not impacted. b. The proposed development complies with applicable design guidelines adopted by the City. The proposed Clearwater Beach Vacation Ownership project is designed to meet the requirements of Beach by Design in scale, bulk, coverage, density and character. The 150' tall section of the project is located at the North end of the site which takes advantage of the vast expanse of public beach to the North. The stepped massing of the project is derived from the massing requirements of Beach by Design. The project layout preserves the views of the neighbors to the South and places active spaces internal to the project site to reduce noise transmission and visual distraction to adjacent properties. The location of the units on the site provides all units in the project with water views and provides easy access for all guests to the public beach and nearby businesses. This project furthers the City's beach revitalization objective of creating a E • • "world class" address by punctuating the newly improved beachfront with a world class resort. The projects "contemporary coastal architecture" compliments the tropical vernacular envisioned in Beach by Design. We provide the following information concerning the height, tower separation, design, scale and mass criteria: Beach by Design VII, B Height and Tower Separation The project consists of two towers, one tower on the north at 150' high and the other on the south 99' -4" measured from FEMA to the top of the main roof deck. Per Beach by Design VII B: "...the height may be increased, however to one hundred fifty feet (150) if'. • Additional density is allocated to the development by transferred development rights as discussed previously (See Item 1 page 6). • B.2 (a) Tower separation: No "portions of the building structures which exceed one hundred feet (100) (in height) are spaced at least 100' apart." The nearest structure to the southeast (440 Gulfview Boulevard) is separated from the 100' plus portion of the proposed building by approximately 150'. See Exhibit C, page 1. • "500' rule ": The Applicant chooses this Option 1 of B2 as "...no more than two (2) structures which exceed one hundred feet (100) are within five hundred (500)... "for this project. See Exhibit C, page 1. z ty- W The floor plate of any portion of a building that exceeds forty -five feet in height is c e limited as follows: a) The largest floor plate between 45 and 100 exceeds 25,000 square feet and is approximately 43,179 square feet. 0ce- 1 0 b) The largest floor plate between 100' and 150' exceeds 10,000 square feet and is approximately 20,832 square feet. The Applicant requests deviations to this requirement as provided by Beach by Design. See below for discussion of mass and scale and an explanation of how the project provides a tiered effect thereby justifying such deviation. Beach by Design VII C Design, Scale and Mass of Buildings The building form is divided vertically into three components: a three -story base that animates the street edge; the body of the building which is made up to the guest units; and the cap of the building which varies from four levels to one level and consists of the luxury suites. 10 • 0 The base of the building addresses the "human scale" with the sensitively articulated architectural treatments at the first 3 levels of the building. The height of the base is compatible with and continues the scale of the buildings to the east across Gulfview Boulevard. The three -story base is perforated by generous scaled openings that clad the parking levels of the building. All openings are strategically located to screen the automobiles within. Shutters, awnings, brackets, louvered panels, and perforated metal screens are utilized to allow natural ventilation of the garage, and to conceal the visibility of vehicles within. The base of the building is capped in most locations by a standing seam metal roofing brow above the third level. This element creates the transition between the vertical stacking of the units above, and the horizontal nature of the 3 story parking base and anchors the pool deck and main public level on the fourth floor. The fourth level also incorporates shade canopies at the public deck level perimeter which form one of the key identity elements on the project. Lush landscaping is included at the entire project perimeter to soften the architecture, and to provide shade at pedestrian walkways and to enhance the beachfront character at all sides of the project. By placing all automobile parking internal to the project, automobiles are not seen and the Beach by Design goal of a pedestrian oriented beach community is realized. The body of the building varies between six and eight levels. These levels form the mid section of the building and are typified by spacious balconies and large windows. The fagade of the body of the building is typified by modulations in the floor plan that move in and out between 5' and 10' a minimum of once in each 28' structural bay. The building fagade in this area is detailed with 6' -8' deep balconies, white aluminum picket railings, window shutters, and occasionally a small awning style metal roof. The highly crafted building form creates strong shadow patterns which further define the elements of the projects form. The cap of the building contains the luxury suites in the project. The pattern of the upper levels is different from the body of the building and helps to break down the massing of the building. This is most evident on the north elevation where two 12' deep slots are cut into the upper 4 floors effectively dividing the upper mass of the building ;_into 3 sections. The upper level balconies at the tower corners step back 4' to create a -I fired effect. The north elevation balconies at the upper 4 floors shift location in etionship to the balconies below breaking the vertical lines of the fagade and. 'gantly breaking down the building massing as seen from the north. This upper rl etion of the building is punctuated by accent metal roof elements containing stairs to ��600f, mechanical rooms, and elevator over runs and horizontal shading elements. Tbojquantifiable aspects of the architectural vocabulary are as follows per Beach by 'esign: • Buildings with a footprint of greater than 5,000 square feet... will be constructed so that no more than two of the three building dimensions in the vertical or horizontal planes are equal in length. 11 0, 0 The building footprint is approximately 60,804 square feet. The building dimensions vary considerably so that no more two of the three building dimensions in the vertical or horizontal planes are equal in length. The project's overall horizontal plane dimensions are approximately: 207'6" wide along Gulf View Blvd, 276' deep along the north side, and 160' high from grade to the taller of the two towers main roof deck; none of these dimensions are "equal" (or vary by less than 40% of the of the shorter two lengths). In addition to these overall dimensions, the building's modulated massing provides considerable dimensional variation. • No plane (or elevation) of the project "...continue(s) uninterrupted for greater than one hundred (100'). The three -story base is punctuated continually with openings to the interior which satisfies this requirement for these levels. From the fourth level up building massing modulates significantly on the east and west elevations as the two towers on the south and north side are expressed; the middle section of the east elevation is recessed back approximately 40' from the tower planes; and the middle section of the west elevation is recessed back approximately 148' from the tower planes. The corners of each of the two towers are provided with corner balconies with recessed ' building planes varying from 5' to 10'; this "eroded" corner treatment greatly reduces the perceived mass of the project. The north tower steps back 14' at levels 12 -16 on . both the east and west ends of the north facade thereby interrupting the plane of the building. In addition to the major tower massing definition, the planes of all the elevations provide in and out modulation of 5' to 10'; the largest uninterrupted plane on any floor plate is approximately 29' (significantly less than the maximum 100' allowed). • At least sixty percent (6091o) of any elevation will be covered with windows or architectural decoration. All of the elevations are provided with large windows (including sliding glass doors and storefront) or architectural decoration including: decorative picket railings; painted metal and decorative precast screen walls at the parking levels; standing seam roofing elements at level 3, 13 and high roof, painted stucco shade structures /brow projections with painted brackets at levels 4, 10, 11, 13, 15, and 16, miscellaneous painted aluminum shutters; and painted aluminum louver panels. The percentage of decoration on each of the exterior elevations are as follows, all exceeding the minimum requirement of 60 %: • No more than sixty percent (6091o) of the theoretical maximum building envelope located above 42' will be occupied by a building. 12 ORIGINAL • North elevation - 62.6% RE001VW • East elevation - 70.7% Oi 200 • South elevation - 66.1 • West elevation - 68.8% PLANNING DEPARTMEN7 GiTy of CLW,' TER These percentages are noted on the architectural plans. • No more than sixty percent (6091o) of the theoretical maximum building envelope located above 42' will be occupied by a building. 12 0 The overall building mass from 45' to 150' (above FEMA) calculates to 44.5 % of the theoretical maximum allowed building envelope. This is significantly less than the 60% maximum allowed building envelope. • The height and mass of buildings will be correlated to: (1) the dimensional aspects of the parcel proposed for development and (2) adjacent public spaces such as streets and parks. The height and mass of the building are correlated to the parcel and adjacent public spaces as described above. • The guideline for mixed use is not applicable. c. The design, scale and intensity of the proposed development supports the established or emerging character of an area; The proposed project is of a scale consistent with that of the Adam's Mark, which was an established landmark at this location for 30 years. The architectural style and compliance with design guidelines will support the emerging character of the area as envisioned by Beach by Design. The project's "contemporary coastal architecture" compliments the tropical vernacular envisioned in Beach by Design. - d. In order to form a cohesive, visually interesting and attractive appearance, the proposed development incorporates a substantial number of the following design elements: • Changes in horizontal building planes; • Use of architectural details such as columns, cornices, stringcourses, pilasters, porticos, balconies, railings, awnings, etc; • Variety in materials, colors and textures; • Distinctive fenestration patterns; • Building stepbacks; and • Distinctive roofs forms. Many of these elements have been incorporated into the design as discussed in detail in response to Criteria 6.b. above. e. The proposed development provides for appropriate buffers, enhanced landscape design and appropriate distances between buildings. Landscaping RE,-D 0 7 2008 13 PLANlimG dVlE i CiTtf Gtt: .-ITER. The landscape plan is in accordance with design guidelines set forth in Beach by Design with special emphasis on selecting plant material that is native and salt - tolerant but provides visual interest. A comprehensive landscape program is not required as the proposed landscape plan meets or exceeds Code requirements. Gulfview Boulevard: Medjool Date Palms will be planted approximately 35' on center to provide height and scale to the building. The pedestrian scale will be further addressed through the use of ornamental trees and accent shrubs as well as dense groundcover beds along the sidewalk. Decorative pavers will be used at the entrances to the garage and through the drop -off area to direct vehicles to the entry. Crosswalks will be paved using the standard Clearwater Beach concrete pavers and a pedestrian connection will be made, from the lobby to the sidewalk, using specialty paving such as concrete pavers or colored concrete. North Property Line: The north property line will be planted with clusters of Cabbage Palms and other salt - tolerant vegetation to create a landscape that will thrive on the site and contribute to the overall sense of place. A pedestrian connection will be made to the existing concrete sidewalk on the south end of the adjacent parking lot. This connection will run along the back of the building and around the south side of the property. Access to this path will be controlled with a gate requiring an entrance code or keycard. Landscape treatments along the north property line will be coordinated with the Beach Walk improvements to provide a seamless feel between properties. Seawall: 14 The area between the seawall and the building will be planted with hardy salt - tolerant vegetation that will withstand close proximity to the saltwater. A fence will be constructed along the seawall for safety. The path from the north property line will meander along the seawall and wrap around the building to the south I, property line. The area adjacent to the path will create opportunities for seating w, so guests can enjoy the view of the Gulf of Mexico. A IS 0 South Property Line: LU 0 6 The south property line will be fenced and have a heavy landscape buffer to shield views from the south onto the property. The pedestrian path will continue a. along the south side of the ,building and connect to the service drive. This exit will serve primarily as a means of emergency exit and is not meant to be used as a main pedestrian corridor. Special emphasis will be placed on buffering the eastern end of the south property line where trash pickup and the electrical room will be located. The buffer will consist of new and existing Cabbage Palms at varying heights, a dense hedge, and flowering vines growing on the fence. 14 • Distances between Buildings The distances between buildings have been discussed in response to Beach by Design guidelines as set forth in Criteria 6.b. The following are additional criteria: Termination of Non - conforming Status The Applicant seeks termination of non - conforming status, in accordance with Section 6 -109 of the Code, to allow the density of 217 hotel rooms on the site. Section 6 -109 of the Code requires a level two approval to terminate status as a non- conforming use or structure with the following requirements: 1. Perimeter buffers conforming to the requirements of Section 3- 1202(C) shall be installed. Perimeter buffers are not required in the Tourist District. 2. Off - street parking lots shall be improved to meet the landscaping standards established in Section 3- 1202(D). This requirement is not applicable as all off - street parking will be enclosed in the building. 3. Any nonconforming sign, outdoor lighting or other accessory structure or accessory use located on the lot shall be terminated, removed or brought into conformity with this development code. f The Applicant agrees to accept a condition of approval requiring signs to comply with Code or be approved as part of a Comprehensive Sign Program. The comprehensive landscaping and comprehensive sign programs (D may be used to satisfy the requirements of this section. :40 The proposed landscaping either meets or exceeds Code requirements as discussed in Comprehensive Infill Criteria 6.e above. As stated above, .the Applicant agrees to a condition of approval requiring signs to comply with Code or approval of a Comprehensive Sign Program. Transfer of Development Rights In connection with the Applicant's request for transfers of density to the property, the following are responses to the TDR criteria of Section 4- 1403.A. 15 1. The development of the parcel proposed for development will not reduce the fair market value of abutting properties. Please see the detailed discussion of how the project will improve abutting properties in response to General Applicability Criteria 2. The redevelopment project will increase the value of the site and neighboring parcels. 2. The uses within the project are otherwise permitted in the City of Clearwater. Overnight accommodation use is permitted in the City. 3. The uses or mix of uses within the project are compatible with adjacent land uses. Please see the detailed discussion of the how the project is compatible with adjacent land uses in the response to General Applicability Criteria 5. The site is located in the Clearwater Pass District which Beach by Design indicates as characterized as "mixed use — high rise condominiums, resort hotels, recreation and tourist and neighborhood serving uses." 4. The development of the parcel proposed for development will upgrade the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. Please see the detailed discussion of how the project will improve abutting properties in response to General Applicability Criteria 2 and 5. 5. The design of the proposed project creates a form and function which enhances the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. This site is at the south end of Beach Walk and as such, the beautification of this site through the proposed redevelopment project will have an immense favorable impact on Beach Walk, both visually and by providing an inviting pedestrian connection to the property. As discussed in detail in response to Comprehensive Infill Criteria #5, the proposed redevelopment will be an economic contributor to the City by increasing tourists to Clearwater Beach. 1/7/2008 12:01 PM 45934.109561 #418618 v1 - TWNacation Ownership /Ex to Comp Infill 16 ORIG M, REV 4. ,04 0 7 2008 MY OF CL.EP�,-,wNATE4 z a i CITY OF CLEARWATER APPLICATION FOR TRANSFER OF �ArE DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, 2nd FLOOR PHONE (727)- 562 -4567 FAX (727) 562 -4576 APPLICANT AND AGENT INFORMATION: APPLICANT'S NAME SALT BLOCK ' 5 7 , L.L.C. 1001 E. Atlantic Avenue, Suite 202 MAILING ADDRESS Delray_ Beach, FL 33483 PHONE NUMBER _ \5C?1� -279 -9900 FAX NUMBER (561) 276 -1563 AGENTNAME E. D. Armstrong III ,johnson ope, o or, uppe urns, LE T3 n n—L 1368. Clearwater. FL. 13757 -1168 PHONE NUMBER 727- 461 -1818 FAX NUMBER : 727 - 462 -0365 SITE TO WHICH THE TDR WILL BE TRANSFERRED (receiver site): PROPERTY OWNER Same as Applicant MAILING ADDRESS PHONE NUMBER LEGAL DESCRIPTION STREET ADDRESS PARCELNUMBER ZONING DISTRICT Same As Applicant q - n FAX NUMBER See Exhibit "A" attached (IF IN METES AND BOUNDS, ATTACH A SEPARATE SHEET) 430 South Gulfview 07/29/15/52380/000 /0330 T SIZE OF SITE 2.45. acres CURRENT USE OF THE 230 overnight accommodation units requested PROPERTY • I# OF HOTEL ROOMS, DWELLING UNITS, COMMERCIAL FLOOR AREA, VACANT] Page 1 of 2 ORIGINAL RECSE D 0 7 2009 CITY O* CLEAMATER J • 217 overnight accommodation units* HOW MANY DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS ARE ALLOCATED TO THIS SITE? HOW MANY DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS ARE BEING TRANSFERRED? 13 overnight accommodation units HAVE DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS PREVIOUSLY BEEN TRANSFERRED TO OR FROM THIS PROPERTY? X YES NO Same as request IF YES, HOW MANY DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS.HAVE BEEN TRANSFERRED? 13 overnight accommodation units IS A HEICTI ffREASE REQUESTED? X YES NO IF YES, HEIGHT REQUESTED: SITE FROM WHICH THE TDR WILL BE TRANSFERRED (sender site): PROPERTY OWNER The transfer of development rights previously occurred pursuant to TDR 2005 =05022 (Copies of deeds are attached) MAILING ADDRESS PHONE NUMBER FAX NUMBER LEGAL DESCRIPTION STREET ADDRESS PARCEL NUMBER ZONING DISTRICT SIZE OF SITE CURRENT USE OF THE PROPERTY (IF IN METES AND BOUNDS, ATTACH A SEPARATE SHEET) t I# OF HOTEL ROOMS, DWELLING UNITS, COMMERCIAL FLOOR AREA, VACANT) HOW MANY DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS ARE ALLOCATED TO THIS SITE? HOW MANY DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS ARE BEING TRANSFERRED? HAVE DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS PREVIOUSLY BEEN TRANSFERRED TO OR FROM THIS PROPERTY? YES NO THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION MUST BE SUBMITTED WITH THE APPLICATION: _ COPY OF THE WARRANTY DEED OF OWNERSHIP OR CONTRACT TO PURCHASE THE RECEIVER SITE; _ STATEMENT THAT THE DEED OF TRANSFER WILL BE RECORDED PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING PERMIT. _ STATEMENT THAT THE DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS REFLECTED IN THE INSTRUMENT OF CONVEYANCE HAVE NOT BEEN CONVEYED TO ANOTHER PERSON. Page 2 of 2 ORIGI REa "7 2008 My O� CLFAiffWATER _ SEALED SURVEY FOR BOTH THE SENDER AND THE RECEIVER SITES WITH THE SQUARE FOOTAGE OR ACREAGE OF EACH SITE. COPY OF THE ZONING MAPS WITH SENDER AND RECEIVER SITE CLEARLY HIGHLIGHTED AND LABELED I, the undersigned, acknowledge that all representations made in this application are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge. Signature of property owner or representative E. D. Armstrong III STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLA w rn to and sul>scijibed before me this . S day of IV A.D., IG 20 and /or by D. Armstrong III who is personally known Nk xxxxxxxxxxxxxXXXXXXXXXM N ' ary publi , my commission expires: S: application forms /development review /transfer of development rights application.doc ,.1�....,.�� Jayne E. Sears _q =.� Commission # DD449633 :.. ..V Exnires Sentember 2 2nn9 �'�i�ni�� 9sntlee ri6p Rein • ineunnee, me, 8A9 =91egOti 0 i Page 3 of 2 ORIGIN REtr ,W JA 6 0 7 2000 PLANNING g���9T �°�"MATER • N. AFFIDAVIT TO AUTHORIZE AGENT: • 1. Provide names of all property owners on deed — PRINT full names: SALT BI= 57, L.L.C. , a Utah limited liability conpany 2. That (I am /we are) the owner(s) and record title holder(s) of the following described property (address or general location): 430 South Gulfview _ ..... ......... ................_Parcel....._ID #....:_07/29/15 / 52380 /00.0./ 0330...:.:....._.............._................ ............................... _........................ .. _ ..................................__...................... ....I....._..............._.__. 3. That this property constitutes the property for which a request for a: (describe request) Flexible developuent approval for a comprehensive infill. redevelopment project - and transfers of develort rights to the property as a receiver site. 4. Th the un ersi (has/have) andoes /do appoint: Dsttiog Il, Es ire __... JOhnsOn,.:._ POpe,..... Bokar .,.......guppel_ .... .......Bui s.,_..._TT . ...... _ .................. :.__...._..._...._.._............................................................_._................................_..................._..... .........................._.... as (his /their) agent(s) to execute any petitions or other documents necessary to affect such petition; 5. That this affidavit has been executed to induce the City of Clearwater, Florida to consider and act on the above described property; 6. That site visits to the property are necessary by City representatives in order to process this application and the owner authorizes City representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application; 7. That (1 /we), the undersigned authority, hereby certify that the foregoing is true and correct. SALT 57, L L. Property Owner Prop rt ................. .......................................... .............. ................... ............ ..................... ............................. _ .... _ ....... _ ........ ...... ...--- ........................ _.... ........ AS............. ..... ....... Property Owner Proparty-Llwner STATE OF FLORIDA, 2 COUNTY OF FHN�AS- PoL(M (�eaCk Before me the undersigned, an officer duly commissioned by the laws of the State of Florida, on this �1 December, 2007 °_ 7......_. ..... ............_.................. day of ersonall appeared * who having been first duly sworn _ ................._.. .. p �_ iti.e�rK......W.a..l s ........................ ............... . Deposes and says that he /she fully understands the contents of the affidavit that he /she signed. *as May--'-Mu of Salt Block 57, L.L.C.. G Notary Seal /Stamp Notary Public Signature My Commission Expires: `]- 3_l.'.2009 DEBORAH HOWARD Notary Public • State of Florida ' My Commlision Expires Jul 31, 2099 Commission a DD 423511 Bonded By National Notary Assn. 'JA' -; C: \Documents and Settings \derek.ferguson\ Desktop\ planningforms- 0707\Comprehensive Infll Project (FLD) 04- 24- 07.doc Page 8 of 8 R��{Ap_ yW', Recap of TDRs to Receiver Site of 430 S. Gulfview #422857 v 1 - TW/rDR Table 0: a � ,x � 0 Number of Residential Seller Address of Sender Site Dwelling Units Recording Information Transferred BayEsplanade.com, LLC 625 -627 Bay Esplanade 1 unit O.R.14634/Pg. 305 Paul Kelley and Tracey Kelley 667 Bay Esplanade 3 units O.R. 14606/Pg.. 945 Teresa A. Kramer and Maxwell M. 557 Cyprus and 579 Cyprus 4 units. O.R. 14826/Pg. 1985 Radford #422857 v 1 - TW/rDR Table 0: a � ,x � 0 EXHIBIT "A" RECEIVER SITE - 430 SOUTH GULMEW A TRACT OF LAND CONSISTING OF LOTS 33, 34 AND 35 AND PART OF LOT 36 OF LLOYD- WHITE - SKINNER SUBDIVISION, ACCORDING TO MAP OR PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN PLAT, BOOK 13, PAGES 12 AND 13 OF THE-PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA AND LANDS AND SUBMERGED LANDS LYING BETWEEN AND SOUTHERLY, SOUTHWESTERLY OR WESTERLY OF THE MEAN HIGH WATER MARK AND THE BULKHEAD LINE DESCRIBED IN AND SET FORTH IN TRUSTEES OF THE INTERNAL IMPROVEMENT FUND OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA DISCLAIMER NO. 22310, AS RECORDED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 765, PAGE 542, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA, SAID TRACT BEING DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: . FROM THE NORTHERN MOST CORNER OF SAID LOT 33, RUN SOUTH 77° 41-16- WEST, ALONG THE NORTHWESTERLY BOUNDARY OF SAID LOT 33 AND THE SOUTHWESTERLY EXTENSION THEREOF, A DISTANCE OF 400.0 FEET TO A POINT ON THE BULKHEAD LINE DESCRIBED ABOVE; RUN THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID BULKHEAD LINE ALONG A CURVE TO THE LEFT (RADIUS - 1247.0 FEET) AN ARC DISTANCE OF 296.79 FEET, (CHORD BEARING - SOUTH19" 07'51" EAST); RUN THENCE NORTH 680 55'27n EAST A DISTANCE OF 402.14 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTHEASTERLY BOUNDARY OF SAID LOT 36, RUN THENCE NORTHWESTERLY ALONG THE NORTHEASTERLY BOUNDARIES OF SAID LOTS 36, 35, 34 AND 33, WHICH LINE IS A CURVE TO THE RIGHT (RADIUS - 847.0 FEET) AN ARC DISTANCE OF 235.76 FEET (CHORD - 235.0 FEET, CHORD BEARING - NORTH 20" IT 10" WEST) TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. BEING THE SAME PROPERTY AS: A TRACT OF LAND CONSISTING OF LOTS 33,34 AND 35 AND PART OF LOT 36 OF LLOYD- WHITE- SKINNER SUBDIVISION, ACCORDING TO THE MAP OR PLAT THEREOF, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 13, PAGES 12 AND 13 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA, AND LANDS AND SUBMERGED LANDS LYING BETWEEN AND SOUTHERLY, SOUTHWESTERLY OR WESTERLY OF THE MEAN HIGH WATER MARK AND THE BULKHEAD LINE DESCRIBED IN AND SET FORTH IN TRUSTEES OF THE INTERNAL IMPROVEMENT FUND OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA DISCLAIMER NO. 22310, AS RECORDED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 765, PAGE 542, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA, SAID TRACT BEING DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGIN AT AN IRON PIN AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT 33 AND THE WEST RIGHT -OF -WAY MARGIN OF GULF VIEW BOULEVARD, SAID POINT BEING THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; SAID POINT BEING THE PC OF A CURVE TO THE LEFT HAVING A RADIUS OF 847.00 FEET AND AN ARC DISTANCE OF 235.76 FEET, THENCE RUN ALONG SAID CURVE TO THE LEFT AND ALONG THE WEST RIGHT -OF -WAY MARGIN OF GULF VIEW BOULEVARD A CHORD BEARING OF SOUTH 20" IT 10" EAST AND A CHORD DISTANCE OF 235.00 FEET TO AN IRON PIN; THENCE RUN SOUTH 68° 55' 27" WEST FOR A DISTANCE OF 402.14 FEET TO AN IRON PIN, SAID POINT BEING THE PC OF A CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A RADIUS OF 1247.00 FEET AND AN ARC DISTANCE OF 296.79 FEET; THENCE RUN ALONG SAID CURVE TO THE RIGHT A CHORD BEARING OF NORTH 19" 07'51 " WEST AND A CHORD DISTANCE OF 296.09 FEET TO AN IRON PIN; THENCE RUN NORTH 77" 41'16" EAST FOR A DISTANCE OF 400.00 FEET TO A POINT AND BACK TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. z w CID CD • • I #: 2005388583 BK: 14634" PG: 305,'09/27/2005 at 06:25 AM, RECORDING 7 PAGES $61.00 D DOC STAMP COLLECTION $560.00 KEN BURKE, CLERK OF COURT PINELLAS COUNTY, FL BY DEPUTY CLERK: CLKDUI3 :i yy vii, This instrument prepared ay and when recorded retumIto' Marc I. Spencer, Esq. 877 Executive Center..Drive W., Suite 205 St. Petersburg, FL 33702,: j WARRANTY DEED -HIS WARRANTY DEED, executed this 13 day of September, 2005, by BA'ES-PLANADE.COM, LLC, a Florida limited liability company, whose address Bay Esplanade, Clearwater Beach, FL 33767, Grantor, to TW /BEACH Rg4ibENCES— CLEARWATER, L.L.C., a Florida limited liability company, �ail,ose address is 877 Executive Center Drive West, Suite 205, St. Petersburg, r..° FL 33702, Grantee. ' WITNESSETH, that Grantor for and in consideration of the sum of Ten and No /100 Dollars ($10.00) and other valuable consideration to said Grantor in hand paid by Grantee, the receipt and whereof is hereby acknowledged, has granted, bargained, and sold to the Grantee, and Grantee's heirs and assigns forever, one (1) density unit development right from that certain property lying situate in Pinellas County, and further described as: Lot 7, Block 78, .Mandalay Unit #5, according to the plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 20, Page 27 of the Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida, and further described as follows: From the Southeast corner of Block 78 of a Replat of Mandalay Unit #5, as recorded in Plat Book 20, Page 48, public records of Pinellas County, Florida, run North 7 degrees 19'30" West, 352.99 feet along the East boundary of said block; thence along a curve to the left of said boundary, chord bearing North 26 degrees 04'45" West, a chord. equals 70.73 feet and radius equals 110 feet for Point of Beginning; run thence South 43 degrees 21'34" West, 131.4 feet to the Northeasterly line of Bay Esplanade; thence along a curve to the left and along said line, chord bearing North 65 degrees 01'22" West, chord equals 41.26 feet and radius equals 64 feet; thence North 4 degrees 13'05" East, 110.67 feet to the Northerly boundary of Block 78; thence East, 41.29 feet along chord equals 84.48 feet and radius equals 110 feet, to the Point of Beginning; together with all reparian rights and submerged land pertaining to the above property and particularly including any and all submerged. land lying between the East and West boundary line of said lot as �® ® , m 0 0 M MM wl Z 0 0 PINELLAS COUNTY FL OFF.' REC. BK 14634 PG 306 extended to channel` in Clearwater Bay, public. records of Pinellas County, Floridas.,A!�.e "Transferor Property "). for transfer to Grantee's.teal property described as: See Exhitit "A° attached hereto (the "Transferee Property"). TO OAVEE,. "AND TO HOLD the same together with all and singular tenements ,Efiereoditaments and appurtenances thereunto belonging or in anywise appertain'.r 1a ,hd all the privilege,. right, title, interest, estate, lien, equity and claim whatsoever of Grantor, either in law or equity, to the only proper use, benefit aAd,behoof of Grantee forever; AND said Grantor does hereby fully warrant the said density unit d�V�loprnent rights, and will defend the same against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said Grantor has hereunto set his hand and seal the day and year first written above intending hereby to restrict, in - ..'�:,j erpetuity, the use of the property first described above. Signed, seated and delivered in the presence of WITN S: Name: n�,, ono. C`,�,;A Na "A etu STATE O A ) COUNTY OF S ) GRANTOR: BAYESPLANADE.COM, LLC; a Florida limited liability comp By: ''✓-��L: William Blackwood, X Manager The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 1372 day of Pte cs2 2005, by William Blackwood, 11, Manager on behalf of Bayesplanade.com, LLC, a Florida limited liability company. He /she is personally known to me or has produced E, t>L as identification. Iona caM QP WWWTWUftMM&,V,,=W * X% owes Public, State of Florida at Large Printed Name: Commission No. My Commission Expires: 05: z Ti 0 4c � M m �Z 4 0 m0 ;0' qz M 0 PINELLAS COUNTY FL OFF: REC. BK 14634 PG 307 •t, EXHM --U A Legal Description A tract of Iandaiaons sting of Lots 33, 34 and 35 and part of Lot 36 of LLOYD -WIM- SK]NNER SUBDIVISION, according to the map or plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book 13, pages 12 and 1,3 bf'the'Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida and lands and submerged lands lying be lw��&n`-"#iid southerly, southwesterly or westerly of the mean high water mark and the Bulkhead Linedescnbed in and set forth in Trustees of the internal Improvement Fund of the State of Fjo�i4a-1~,)i'sclaimer No. 22310, as recorded in Official Records Book follows: Page 542 of the Public Reegrds of Pinellas County, Florida, said tract being described as follows: ze , =1?r6dr "the Northern most corner of said Lot 33, run South 770 41' 16" West, along the Norte eaterty boundary of said Lot 33 and the Southwesterly extension thereof, a distance of 40 .16et to a point on the Bulkhead Line described above; run thence Southeasterly along said Bullzlieitd Line along a curve to the left (radius — 1247.0 feet) an arc distance of 296.79 feet �h rd 269.09 feet, chord bearing — South 19° 07' 51" East); run thence North 68° SS' 27" East ( Q : of said Lot 36; run thence ' .a ;distance of 402.14 feet to a point on the Northeasterly boundary ... Northwesterly along the Northeasterly boundaries of said Lots 36, 35, 34 and 33, which line is a `curve to the right (radius — 847.0 feet) an arc distance of 235.76 feet (chord — 235.0 feet, chord bearing —North 20° 17' 10" West) to the Point of Beginning. �® V4 DU- 5919894v2 A-] PINELLAS COUNTY FL OFF: REC. BK 14634 PG 306 OONSENT OF MORTGAGEE Regarding Transfer of Density Unit Development Rights by Owner i Ronrick H. Kern arjd"Susan Kem, as to 12.5 %, Ruth Geror, as to 50 %, and Herb. Kam and Nona Kem, . as` to -37. ;5 %, (collectively the "Mortgagee "), the holder of the Mortgage executed by 15 y08 lanade.com, LLC ( "Owner") in favor of Mortgagee, dated January 29, 2004 and rei;64 i:! in Official Records Book 13355, Page 402, re- recorded in Official Records Book43466, Page 2522, and as mod'fiied by Mortgage Modification Agreement t3< Notice of-Future Advance dated December 27, 2004 recorded in Official Records Book 140491 Pagn.9938 all of the Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida, which Mortgage constit(its fir; lien and encumbrance upon . all or a portion of the real property described within . the foregoing Warranty Deed Transfer of Density Unit Development Rights (the the Transferor Property, hereby consents to Owner transferring one (1) Density Uhifibevelopment Right from the Transferor Property to the Transferee Property described S. } l Notwithstanding the execution of this consent, nothing herein shall be construed to render .' Mortgagee responsible or liable for the performance of any of the covenants or ",-Undertakings of Owner under this Deed. Dated this day 200 T Witness: PVA Print name: NancyW. Chlofalo Print name: Cris"" Lopes Witness: Print name: Nan . . Chlofglo Print name: CriStina Zgp= L11 . ( Cri Ronrick H. Kern Susan Kern z 0 rv.s --.a rn n m ;si j Z M0 C� ro M PT7 PINELLAS COUNTY FL OFF: REC. BK 14634 PG 309 •.Z t Witne 7 Print n me: N Ft cc— y • Chiofalo uth Geror Print name:'. C sUna Lopes Wdness ,: print name: NanCY MONO Herb Kern i Print name: LL��•��!! / /�_na Lopez Witness: Nona Kem Print named Nancy . CiMoW Gi�rstina Lops Print name: 05. c. 0 -; s M � 59'a. ry d K. 3 <, M M PINELLAS COUNTY FL OFF: REC. BK 14634 PG 310 STATE OF FLORIDA (' ' COUNTY OF I�Scb�,f�E The foregoing ,-,instrument was acknowledged before , 2005, .. by Ronrick H. Kem. He /she is � one pro used •ai3 identification. Ja`:d'YO s , I'll Florida RV, sa' +• • -,; oi�AiC'!1E%{7h,l.1113.2009 :erg �' i�nSlssior u DD 3/597? Nnri: nr.V Notary A>5t1 OF STATE ,OF FLORIDA ) C011N Y'OFQcC»� • me this %-"I'- day of known to me or has MoL ry Publij State of Flonda Il arge Printed Na �/ Commission No. My Commission Expires: . 'The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this •k i by Susan Kern. He /she is personally known t as identification. NANCY M. CHIOFALO � �� "r' Notary Pub ' State of Fbdda : Commission # DD 375972 'OF g,�,dedByra0or►a1No" STATE OF FLORIDA ) COUNTY OF ) The foregoing instrument was 2005, by Ruth Geror pro used as identification. NANCY M. CHIOFALO Notary Public • 51a1e of Florida fr,t Cawadonbpkizjan3,2009 Commission N DD 376972 Bonded By Nallonof NotayAum day of o me or has ffl&ary Puti, State of Flo n at Large Printed Name: � Commission No. My Commission Expires: acknowledged before me this I�day of He /she is .bona known to me or has AkitaR?y Pdblic, State of at Large Printed Name: Commission No. My Commission Expires: n c..� /..0 ^per V0 p�p ��y.t'-Y�M�w� /���y `I'i�F V'+.q. ��d^ 1, M �. ® M 5, 7' 1n v 0 .0 PINELLAS COUNTY FL OFF: REC. BK 14634 PG 311 • A 7 STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF ) Th foregoino ,instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 2005,'by,;Herb Kem. He/she is personally known to me or has produced as identification. ICY -% CHIOFALO °�' !ublfa; Stale of Flodda /7' g+o.�` s %E,,Pfolarll 6yjm3,20W C Do3�7 ry P q State of Flofi t Large . %� „a;,t.�ir►dgv►O"°l Printed Name: Commission No. My Commission Expires: STATE`O' F FLORIDA ) COUNTY OF ) The foregoing instrument was admowledged before me this %*— day of 005, by Nona Kem. He /she is personally known to me or has produced as identification. NANCY M. CHI IOFALO f M000 •y`r MyCam Public Ndor+Fas i�3.2009 . = ary Pu , State of Flori Large ,y Commlallon +� OD 375972 Punted Name: � ” ^ ^°' � Bonded 9y Nallm�al Nolary A Commission No. My Commission Expires: 0 0 0-- .tD.u. ' ,�• f9�" r� j F I #: 2005370932 BK: 14606 PG: 945, 09/15/2005 at '05:09 PM,, RECORDING 5 PAGES $44.00 D DOC STAMP COLLECTION $1680.00 KEN BURKE, CLERK OF COURT PINELLAS COUNTY, FL BY DEPUTY CLERK: CLKDU08 r ! This instrument prepared by. and when recorded return ` #a . Marc I. Spencer, Esq. 877 Executive Center brine W.; Suite 205 St. Petersburg, FL 33702 WARRANTY DEED TRANSFER OF DENSITY UNIT DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS y 77 THIS VARRANTY DEED, executed this 2µo day of Se-wey 2005, by PAUL KELLEY land TRACEY KELLEY, whose address is 667 Bay Esplanade, Clearwater Beach, FL 33767, /bt0616rs, to TW /BEACH. RESIDENCES — CLEARWATER, L.L.C., a Florida limited liabilitj;`company, whose address is 877 Executive Center Drive West, Suite 205, St. Petersburg; •FL 33702, Grantee. WITNESSETH, that Grantors for and in consideration of -the sum of $10.00 and other v'tuable consideration to said Grantors in hand ,paid by Grantee, the receipt and whereof is he,415y acknowledged, has granted, bargained, and sold to the Grantee, and Grantee's heirs and assigns forever, three (3) density unit development rights from that certain property lying situate .in.Pinellas County, and further described as: Lot 7, Block 77, Unit No. 5, according to the map or plat thereof as recorded in .' Plat Book 20, Page 27, Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida (the "Transferor Property"). for transfer to Grantee's real property described as: See Exhibit "A" attached hereto (the "Transferee Property"). TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the same together with all and singular tenements, hereditaments and appurtenances thereunto belonging or in anywise appertaining, and all the privilege, right, title, interest, estate, lien, equity and claim whatsoever of Grantors, either in law or equity, to the only proper use, benefit and behoof of Grantee forever AND said Grantors do hereby fully warrant the said density unit development rights, and will defend the same against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever. ' IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said Grantors have hereunto set their hands and seals the day and year first written above intending hereby to restrict, in perpetuity, the use. of the property first described above. Signed, sealed and delivered in the presence of WIT SSES: �ICG Name: onto+ �►�� Name:" (26,4ac. 07. 7.- M M M Z C:2.d rn � _ �� G3 r�rc � PINELLAS COUNTY FL OFF.' REC. BK 14606 PG 946 STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF PINELLAST., The foregoing lngtturhent was acknowledged before me this day of September, 2005. by Paul Kelley. H;Iihe is personally known to me or has produced Fl U.L. as identification. 400. 6 CID -i, -D Notary Jbubfic, State of Florida at Large Printed Name: Commission No. S, eormroim A C41141 OYMUMN* DDW41 SM NovemberZ 2W6 My Commission we STATE OF FLORIDA 'CbIJNTY OF PINELLAS) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 201� day of September, 2005, by Tracey Kelley. He/she is personally known to me or has produced FL- D as "Identification. K(4a) �Nota�Rblic, �State �ofFloti�daat La�rge�� Printed Name: Commission No. My Commission Expires: LOW CAN N WCOMMOMO DD140741 EVW November Z 2006 60MMTNRUTR0YFA1NWMNCXWC -0 0 0 0 0 1=) rn ;a V M C:2 --A M M. .13 Z • PINELLAS COUNTY FL OFF.' REC. BK 14606 PG 947 V • EXHIBIT A Legal Description A tract of land con"i1sting of Lots 33, 34 and 35 and part of Lot 36 of LLOYD- WHITE- SKINNER SUBDIVISION, according to the map or plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book 13, pages 12 and 13 Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida and lands and submerged lands lying bet*fti , i. �d southerly, southwesterly or westerly of the mean high water mark and the Bulkheadl-i�ie described in and set forth in Trustees of the Internal Improvement Fund of the State of Flbrida,,.,&sclaimer No. 22310, as recorded in Official Records Book 765, Page 542 of the Publi4 Records of Pinellas County,' Florida, said tract being described as f ollows-. Lot 33, ran South 77* 41' 16" West, along the -�roih. the Northern most comer of said Lo tension thereof, a distance of Northwesterly . I boundary of said Lot 33 and the Southwesterly ex scribed above; run thence Southeasterly along said 4Q00,fe�j; to a point on the Bulkhead Line de 4ql�h.jead Line along a curve to the left (radius — 1247.0 feet) an arc distance of 296.79 feet thence North 68' 55' 27" East (..qh&*'�- 269-09 feet, chord bearing — South 190 07' 51" East); ran y boundary of said Lot 36; run thence �a._,�H$tance of 402.14 feet to a point on the Northeasterly ,:.Nofthwesterly along the Northeasterly boundaries of said Lots 36, 35, 34 and 33 which line is a iarve to the right (radius — 847.0 feet) an arc distance of 235.76 feet (chord. 235.0 feet, chord p bearing —North 20' 17' 10" Wes t) to the Point of Beginning. DLI-5919994V2 A-1 10 05 7 71 0 rn 0 M >1 :Z! M M • PINELLAS COUNTY FL OFF.' REC. BK 14606 PG 948 If I • 4, CONSENT OF MORTGAGEE Regardtilg Transfer of Density Unit Development Rights by Owner Business Loan Centar,...LLC, (the "Mortgagee'), the holder of the Mortgage executed by Kelley Investment & Management Corp, a Florida corporation, allde Kelley Investment and Management Corp. ( "Owner -)Jh °•fevor of Mortgagee, dated August 20, 2003 and recorded in Official Records Book 13033, Page 28;i:0.;of:the Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida, which Mortgage constitutes a lien and enctittbrartce upon all or a portion of the real property described within the Warranty Deed Transfer of .Der'to1 Unit Development Rights (the "Deed') as the Transferor Property, hereby consents;to:Ov iher transferring the 3 Density Unit Development Rights from the Transferor Property to the T4nsfefee Property described in said Deed. Notwithstanding the execution of this consent, nothing herein shall be construed to render the M04*6%responsible,or liable for the performance of any of the covenants or undertakings of the Ownei :Under this Deed. Detetl this, day of 0 2005. Print name:l�S�.' L • H►LTo+� Print name: STATE OF COUNTY OF Oagjnv►il(5 ) BUSINESS LOAN CENTER, LLC By; Cl �0"Q� Print Name: =ooeS its:_ y•cc Tim foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this31'ay of 4� —, 2006, by 1 lor1 =C>Q&S as 1)LCQ PYQ- -10Prx- ro f Business Loan Center, LLC, a _C'c -► M'rn ; t- He/94e -is personally known to rgke� $r QKS, i' has produced DrtVQrs as Identification. '1.µ,; •••• s F � Notary Public, State of Florida at e 3, Printed Name: 4%tua Y. a Commission No. M'ylyy�gNN� My Commission Expires D� ,,.r>lir►,..- .. l�►rVl11Nt1' IF, 29l3F °o ® /� `J rn M M ;0 Z • PINELLAS COUNTY FL OFF.' REC. BK 14606 PG 949 • :'­CONSENT OF MORTGAGEE Regarding Ttahs #ef of Density Unit Development Rights by Owner Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems as nominee for America's Servicing Company, (the "Mortgagee "), the holder of the Mortgage executed. by Paul Kelley and Tracey Kelley, husband and wife, ( "Owner") in favor,:of Mortgagee, dated May 5, 2004 and recorded in Official Records Book 13562, Page 232-1.,6f.tFfe- '0ublic Records of Pinellas County, Florida, which Mortgage constitutes a lien and encumbrance °upon all or a portion of the real property described within the Warranty Deed Transfer of Density Unit Development Rights (the "Deed ") as the Transferor Property, hereby consents to Ow,r W'6nsferring the 3 Density Unit Development Rights from the Transferor Property to the Transf&ee:Pr'onerty described in said Deed. . withs%riklir� the execution of this consent, nothing herein shall be construed to render the lgag @: responsible or liable for the performance of any of the covenants or undertakings of the n .F underthis Deed. day of August, 2005. N,`Wtness: lit ` Priyt name: Qhrt S fin Ao(!J, Print name: J%hj &YJ(J14,_, STATE OF MARYLAND ) COUNTY OF _Frederick MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS AS NOMINEE FOR AMERICA'S SERVICING COMPANY By: Print Name: Teresa A. Naylor Its: Vice President The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of August, 2005, by Teresa A. Naylor, as Vice President of Mortga �eEllfe.-ctronic Registration Systems as nominee for America's Servicing Company. He /she is�nown o or has produced as identification. 11-.— m �1 Notary Public, State of Maryland C� r ; Printed Name: Vera Sara Smith Commission No. My Commission Expires: VC • 7� X00.5 7 iwmmesom�sos � rte' rte rt cz rn r. rr9 rr m �1 I #: 2005510738 $35.50 D DOC COUNTY, FL BY BK: 14826 PG: 1985, 12/22/2005 at 12:53 PM, RECORDING 4 PAGES STAMP COLLECTION $2240.00 KEN BURKE, CLERK OF COURT PINELLAS DEPUTY CLERK: CLKDU08 , t This instrument prepared by",.. "",..y and when recorded return to:" ,, Marc I. Spencer, Esq. } �, 877 Executive Center Dri-ve,11G, Suite 205 St. Petersburg, FL 33702``" WARRANTY DEED Ti►NSFER OF DENSITY UNIT DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS THIS'i1MAIiRANTY DEED, executed this /90 day of 2005, by TERESA A ';I4MAMER and MAXWELL M. RADFORD, whose address is 55 Laurel Street, Clearwatbe- , FL .,33767, Grantors, to TWIBEACH RESIDENCES — CLEARWATER, L.L.C.; a Florida °Jfrriited liability company, whose address is 877 Executive Center Drive West, Suite 205, St`Pbfer`sburg, FL 33702, Grantee. WITNESSETH, that Grantors for and in consideration of the sum of $10.00 and other valuable consideration to said Grantors in hand paid by Grantee, the receipt and whereof is 'here . bytacknowledged, has granted, bargained, and sold to the Grantee, and Grantee's heirs and assigns forever, four (4) density unit development rights from that certain property lying situate in `,!F, eIias County, and further described as: Y ` That part of the unplatted block 79, Unit No. 5, Mandalay replat, according to the map or plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 20, Page 48, which was formerly known as Lot 4, Block 79, Mandalay "The Isle of a Thousand Palms" Clearwater Beach Unit No. 5, according to the map or plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 20, Page 27, Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida (the "Transferor Property "). for transfer to Grantee's real property described as: See Exhibit "A" attached hereto (the "Transferee Property"). TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the same together with all and singular tenements, hereditaments and appurtenances thereunto belonging or in anywise appertaining, and all the privilege, right, title, interest, estate, lien, equity and claim whatsoever of Grantors, either in law or equity, to the only proper use, benefit and behoof of Grantee forever AND said Grantors do hereby fully warrant the said density unit development rights, and will defend the same against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said Grantors have hereunto set their hands and seals the day and year first written above intending hereby to restrict, in perpetuity, the use of the property first described above. Signed, sealed and delivered in the presence of .,0 WIT S G RS: � err , M M `� 0 , Name: fl►V �n scn� Teresa A. Kramer > rf; -U, r� Name: R ;4- Maxwell M. Rad ord'. > ry r r PINELLAS COUNTY FL OFF: REC. BK 14826 PG 1986 STATE OF FLORIDA ) COUNTY OF PINELLAS)­; ,.,: ".. The foregoing instrur0ent was acknowledged before me this f *day of November, 2005, by Teresa A. Kramer. He %slue i e or has produced F Ua ,& %o,► as identification. O.. .a ca Ltccas+ NOTARY PUBLtGSTATE Op'`p RIDA Rita jaliij9cin0 Comnilsstoa #]3D376706 lic, State of Florida at Large Expifgs:.. 20, 2008 75rinted Name: Bonded ThrurAdj tic #:ondlng Co., Inc. Commission No. My Commission Expires: S.TA4Ti OF FLORIDA ) ;'CQI,J * OF PINELLAS) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this �� day of November, 2005, by-Maxwell M. Radford. He! has produced . as ".identification. ►< NOTARY P s 0, Rita Jane #DD376706 Not rc, State of Florida at Large Commission Expires; DEC. 20, 2048 y°nding CO-, Ina Printed Name: Commission No. Bonded 7Fw Adanda My Commission Expires: P e: rrr PINELLAS COUNTY FL OFF. REC. BK 14826 PG 1987 `y ` EXHIBIT A `... Legal Description :1 A tract of land "oonsistmg of Lots 33; 34 and 35 and part of Lot 36 of LLOYD- WIETE- SKINRIBR SUBDIVISION, according to the map or plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book 13, pages 12 and Ii- 4%tlie'Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida and lands and submerged lands lying betvvrrtri::arid southerly, southwesterly or westerly of the mean high water mark and the Bulkhead. Ljpedescribed in and set forth in Trustees of the Internal Improvement Fund of the State of Florida- 1sclaimer No. 22310, as recorded in Official Records Book 765, Page 542 of the Public Recs of Pinellas County, Florida, said tract being described as follows: ;,Frain the Northern most corner of said Lot 33, run South 77° 41' 16" West, along e Nort�ste`ly boundary of said Lot 33 and the Southwesterly extension thereof, a distance of 400 0_ fret to a point on the Bulkhead Line described above; run thence Southeasterly along said Bulkhead Line along a curve to the left (radius — 1247.0 feet) an arc distance of 296.79 feet ,..(chord — 269.09 feet, chord bearing — South 19° 07' 51" East); run thence North 68° 55' 27" East s:..ilsstance of 402.14 feet to a point on the Northeasterly boundary of said Lot 36; run thence Notthwesterly along the Northeasterly boundaries of said Lots 36, 35, 34 and 33, which line is a '' curve to the right (radius — 847.0 feet) an arc distance of 235.76 feet (chord — 235.0 feet, chord hearing — North 200 17' 10" West) to the Point of Beginning. DU- 5919894v2 A -1 Xj NJ c re rr. DU- 5919894v2 A -1 PINELLAS COUNTY FL OFF: REC. BK 14826 PG 1988 •. i 4. �sRNSENT OF MORTGAGN Regarding *06i of Density Unit Devebprnent Rights by Owner Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. a Delaware corporation, as nominee for American Home Mortgage Acceptance, Inc. (the 'Mortgagee"), the holder of the Mortgage executed by Teresa A- Kramer and Max A1041, NI.,,Radford ("Owner") In favor of Mortgagee, dated November 23, 2004 and recorded in Offi* 4l edp ds Book 13962, Page 2009 of the Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida, which Mortg' ° e t;onstitutes a lien and encumbrance upon all or a portion of the real property described within, th6oregoing Warranty Deed Transfer of Density Unit Development Rights (the °Deed's as t#xr - Vansferor Property, hereby consents to Owner tranderring the four (4) Density Unit Development Rights from the Transferor Property to the Transferee Property described in said Deed. Notwithstanding the execution of this consent, nothing herein ehefi be construed to render the Mortgage4.t6*nsible or liable for the performance of any of the covenants or undertakings of the owner Wr►der this Deed. Dated ttiia day of nl--? -e7N1 &X 200-'5-. t. l fitne", ,. Print nam LIL w -L Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, inc., as norrunee for American Home Mortgage Ac n , Inc. B AA Print Name: UICk� Its: Print name: STATE OF COUNTY OF "1� t _ Li4S i The foregoing instrument was acknowledged b re me is da of 200 , by RejW) 9,.wit�'Vi'1Glyl ss_ I of Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc., a Delaware corporation. Helshe Is personalty known to me or has produced --- as identification. SHANIQUTA N. CLARK i ry bl a W Name: in S t Large • MY COMMISSION EXPIRES Pr S ( a n is Q Septenmer 9, Zoos Commission NO. _. My CommiSSIOn EVIMS: '416112-40 6 (v qED (�RIt�II�A4� RIE ;S, � I�Y� --NG p) Cd�i�+R� CIV of. `�C WI IV[ I SUUII Sl►UULU(U5 diU YIdWUU IIU1II UIV Ud5l UU IIUL occupy a total of 40% of a north south vertical plane which is parallel to the alignment of Coronado and -° North Mandalay of the building envelope above 100'); Opflon 1* �3'TR U(°TURESI INDICT ARE (.-)VER 140` I HEIGHT r R C 11TECT ML .... ,. Get" i?!1rQr) I . 6 Beach by Design 0 C. Design, Scale and Mass of building MASSING MODEL VIEW FROM SOUTHEAST 01 100, EXHIBIT C: page 3 December 12, 2007 OE ...ANN 'v�fy VOLUME 1 = 2)291) f VOLUME 2 = 974141 PROPOSED VOLUME 1 + 2 = 3,266,271 cu. ft. MASSING MODEL VIEW FROM NORTHWEST Exhibit CA Mass of Building: CA 60% of Th..,--.1.oretical Maximum Building Envelope Allowable building envelope = 60% of theoretical max. building envelope: 60% of 7,334,878 cu. ft. = 4,400,927 cu. ft. rroposed buildinq envelope: .3,41-66,271 cu. ft., 44-;' )% of theoretical max. buildinq envelope (<60%) HIP PROJEG-1- CLEARWATER BEACH VACATIONOWNERSi Ulj— j d JI—JIMA" Beach by Design � C. Design, Scale and Mass of building 4. No more than (60 %) of the theoretical maximum building envelope located above forty -five feet (45') Ml be occupied by a building. For the purpose of this standard, theoretical maximum building envelope is the maximum permitted building volume that could be theoretically occupied by a building and occupied by building includes any portion of the maximum possible building envelope that is not visible from a public street. * NOTE Theoretical max. calculation assumes: 15' front setback 10' side setback 0' setback from the CCCL W AAA 001590 EXHIBIT C: page 2 December 12, 2007 I' Theoretical Ma hu , Buildina EnvelbVe ZD LO ° I 78 cu. ft. ORIGINAI. RECEIVED \ DEC 13 2007 PLANNING DEPARTMENT Clay OF CLEARWATER Allowable building envelope = 60% of theoretical %n x. # r • M Proposed building envelope: 3,266,271 cu. fit., 5% of theoretical max. building envelope ( <60 %) CLEARWATER NEAGH VACATION OWNERSHIP PROJECT i 0 PUBLIC BEACH I MCI GULF OF MMW I O I I it I ! I �1 _ -- - -- -- - -- - --- — -- - — — — - --- J - I t t PNORI UT. WNxE 6' tNaOOtO NBT£ Ebal:S 11aNDafR Ai GR Lard I P.Wg Cam Pmkd T.&. 3 T"Bpares 3T.A Space 9 H.*. Sp— 9ft* pSpares . Starda,d Spares 151 S—M Spaces 10 Sbdee Valet Spares 46StacMeGV&tSO 116UWT.WSpaas 409 TOW —e gSpaces Q� •FEI9 —mw Oa' BEOMN J -M N o. � X v � 6 ��SOS6Y roixE NtmMG� oNNOr WB ILEY bRECRY Aii11LLD r0 ME UWllam SIKH AB BUeBNg f SOAS, IIOOG cm TsE 9 1 P0.WEC1WaS TOSEnUm bro &mDeaOA SElflbsi (BUT MT EaaCAMC11bG d ME E Level 1 Floor Plan I a W J m 3 J C7 x O • r • 0 —� I IIr41 to !I I I-j - -- - -- -- - - - - - -- I I I 1 I - I I �► I I I I I I i n y $I e �I aunaxc a eaamaD rewc i i i amuc n eucnxD ,�mc / 1�fllljl *,o � I �� A -- M aaaaaaaaaaaaaa. A A -- A aaaaaaaaaaaaa� M $ xores I Oocm axnn xcc s xcauwcucx a scenes J -DDe Da o. wnva ewsoxas m mom xD uau rx.x i.• wro sneanc I t AaClro•LWCxf YfN SeleKr rRE15 RF➢LOR1D]!R 0{ SECllaa J -DDe DFY I eccnr CkY oavl[crnas YiaEO 50144 ro ME euumw u,D x0! a uTDrn m rxc amurm sues 4 ealnw pASCMS, xDOr I av¢wuucs. nvcs, name oran roux nuc sumac cvowcx •s+aras. uumla¢s, um orarx salupNa xxDiccuoas ro cmrim mro eunowc sereacrs tear xor omovJapm ax rxc eeN - �ro Level 2 Floor Plan I ewes wa . Tn E I 1 li 1 II II i i I �I Levd7PaM1iq Coum p Prple[.As 114 SIaMV 3TadtS V*1Ss, N swimT1W Spares 9eanmrap Spares 1114rp11 TOw Spaces` NSpaces 140 Sw Vabl epams <9 aw row paMYiA spaces T.wE NORTH s a Ug Z �a F^ Z� Um < �m u° oLL G� 111111 } E za ZdS� 6 �E Q a y O 00 U U iz acdi cli m c 3 U &D N r8y sE 0 3ao3� Q 0 9 o LU PIP.. a - I -- I - -- -- -- - - - - -- I - - - -- I I I I 11 1 t� I i li I I - - -- - - - - -- - - - -- - - - - f II � Ii I - - - - -- - - - - -- - - - - - - -- - - - -- - I I i i I �-► I I I I -_-► I I 4--j I I I II I I II i �xr i ri- ------ �'. ounWe a aunpm HaD.s - ------------- i GH11120i BULDWC .B0.£ t 3PWFLyE PSI aG Totals: I fHDB61mYENT BEkIS BE0.pR11ESif DE SECNH 3 -am Dfll 6 .uB.uw fiYLON[S i0 ExIExO x0 ssOnE Thw ]d' MO -t - 137 SW dSeams 9 Spaces 1 .d3 VlW Sp ms 9HWdmp Spaces (1l EWGU.nadT MD SEIBra IIEE15 pypig SFLIa 3-908 rtFY 149 LSVeIJTpIN SPams 35ISIardere Spaces XX 410�'WD pglECt45 IiiSUfD SOlpv 20 ir¢ BUIDDG L xOr WT.W*etl VaHSO p(EI:ILT M1sFD ro THE OidIHD SU01a A9 BDLLdXG . 5. PDDf m�u wDO 409 Tolal PaNlp Spares r Mi 1 sETBSDKS. (BUr xor EHCnGWWG Ox rHE mxi) Level 3 Floor Plan 1 it I aSd I I! II I I I pD�,Tm i I NORTH a M® U Z N �a yU� 4� O$ s a 111111 W mill �aLL x� o� o U > N I &-rol J ca cri U � � Q b M �ga i Y 0 • 0 0 L � � 0 0 0 0 � o I II ( ---- - - - - -- i i i I i aunn¢ ar amr mo. - I ill I I o� o« . r ours ¢aumvn or scrnox a_sm rtrr a a o ow xs ,o oor n rw yarc ,ww 24'M sneru �x urnnnncxr w,o ssreux �¢c�s wcouomm�rs ov smnox a-sm my auo.wc wm.rsroxs uru�m sour ro me aummc wu xor nr&crtr usxm ro n�c cwauxo susw ♦t euYnu+s nsa.�s, wor ownuHCS, ucs, nwows omu ,ru„ mm srwmc cv+oc¢s. mnws, urnau¢s. wm orax som..w a,mx<,axs m u�cxo omo ewnws s[,arus. (eur w, [xcxanam a m[ aN Level 4 Floor Plan emeIm.td I i i i i i i i ( I I I ( '1 MIe6 6 FOOV' ®D/ I NORTH e CJ � z_S �g v� U° 0c a� z x a; `m 01 c � O U U c0 U � c m (b N cd 3 U � � $o y 4 F= N �gFS» Q • • 0 0 ORIGI.% RECD f�q A 3 f 072000 T f LJ`l��ii,7'i� �jq,,r�Y C11Y CtE'41MATER u • I I z ovamra°,nrt .oD gie.a ums Dcow¢uons a ucnax a-am nd GI � .un.ac PPLFLIDN$ Ifi1xE0 $pELY f0 11,E BNI°MD .WD IW! px[crtr unxm ro iME cnDUrm suDn •s auomc riso. s. rmo� I u.cES. oiwD�i�rtn sW°�w.w01�icm sErosf d'�urto°�amac• scfans (art rcr cwnornrvk ox iME ao-) I r� ENC�ObYEM DEE15 FIpI D! SECMM J -90! Dd 0. 4lLWwD rs ro ociwo xo �a¢ flWl :.• wro scfewx. Level 5 Floor Plan Scft Vw • T4 smunuW .eD.c w M 1 t r NORTH 777 u� Zo Us x� dm Ow Q x: - 111111 z Zg Q LL N o O 41 U cc C N N m m La ca m Co 3 J LO CD U � � B Q 33 4 IL "+e=_ I I i - - --- -- -- — — — — — -- - — -- - ---- �I L- b -_ •BWDWD SEIBY. WEb �7 �j b - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I I z ovamra°,nrt .oD gie.a ums Dcow¢uons a ucnax a-am nd GI � .un.ac PPLFLIDN$ Ifi1xE0 $pELY f0 11,E BNI°MD .WD IW! px[crtr unxm ro iME cnDUrm suDn •s auomc riso. s. rmo� I u.cES. oiwD�i�rtn sW°�w.w01�icm sErosf d'�urto°�amac• scfans (art rcr cwnornrvk ox iME ao-) I r� ENC�ObYEM DEE15 FIpI D! SECMM J -90! Dd 0. 4lLWwD rs ro ociwo xo �a¢ flWl :.• wro scfewx. Level 5 Floor Plan Scft Vw • T4 smunuW .eD.c w M 1 t r NORTH 777 u� Zo Us x� dm Ow Q x: - 111111 z Zg Q LL N o O 41 U cc C N N m m La ca m Co 3 J LO CD U � � B Q 33 4 7 w C= C! uj U (:J a, Oa w A U a. U Ll 0 �I 1 nEMOi °M.iIYEXr Prt0 4:I8YR f1Efr5 Rmir¢imiss OP SLIgR J-9m IRY XXII �wc Pmrescxs uns¢u wnr ra n¢ ausnasc iw° R°r ouacrtr unsva ro mE arouxo wa ws euRwic rsc s, aoor - I ��•� an¢n°� ° P1Np1RUCCraxs�ros'oi cxo i.ro�ewsnmc�'G$' ' sESav+a. ryun snr usom.�w° a rr¢ uRl Levels 6 -9 Floor Plans ImEs �icRafcf°¢Rr IYEIS REC4REYEM Or 4G11°X 3 -9® REfI n M1nRW° ¢s m Ezmi° xo iWPE rfum aP Prto srnr ..1 i NORTH a U S Z N U$ T� U° Cn a i Z1 p�tililil r� J � Sa p Q. LL O U � U p i g L LL U Of m9 ca� m 3 J U � � co O 8 1 ��- °- �n°f"IY IO,E _ �aesr ' I � I ' I 1 i ra I I I I I I 1 fast. I--------- I § I I � moss I 194Q I I I i ., - I i I -- — - � - -- -- -- I - — - - - - - - - � I -- -- -- -- - - - -- - -- 1 � I I i --- � � - -III -- -- � - - - -- y -� - - --- I TT 1 — — - _ PR°PERIr W!E �I 1 nEMOi °M.iIYEXr Prt0 4:I8YR f1Efr5 Rmir¢imiss OP SLIgR J-9m IRY XXII �wc Pmrescxs uns¢u wnr ra n¢ ausnasc iw° R°r ouacrtr unsva ro mE arouxo wa ws euRwic rsc s, aoor - I ��•� an¢n°� ° P1Np1RUCCraxs�ros'oi cxo i.ro�ewsnmc�'G$' ' sESav+a. ryun snr usom.�w° a rr¢ uRl Levels 6 -9 Floor Plans ImEs �icRafcf°¢Rr IYEIS REC4REYEM Or 4G11°X 3 -9® REfI n M1nRW° ¢s m Ezmi° xo iWPE rfum aP Prto srnr ..1 i NORTH a U S Z N U$ T� U° Cn a i Z1 p�tililil r� J � Sa p Q. LL O U � U p i g L LL U Of m9 ca� m 3 J U � � co O 8 0 0 RECe,trc,D �,1:; 0 7 2008 PLA. CLEA- 1 WATER i 24' ' I c j l i I i i I I I j i I I I I I _ — i I_ _ I I I 1 I I I I I I �I �xC1iS I �ucox¢sNwla°uxn Yxns rapxlavwr a scrnox -am Irtll a uion,c ro Ixu�o xo •oxe rwrr xr wro grate. I �I Qo,aw<x °un nro grBILK ,¢crs laawmaxrs ar gClgx s-9ae °n wo�wc w+arcrors unxm sn¢r ro rnt: e,¢owc iro rmr n16LRr Ki1%Ea ro 1nE GaW10 SIIM AS BL°°C iASMS, a0n I w° � "qus. i+n�o ° �ICCrax`"s�ms`mµu°%i eur"'�um+c�01cs. glaY,tS. leur wr EMCRab+wc a n¢ aW I Level 10 Floor Plan ems vie • ra i i i i I I I I I� I I I i -- 1 I I 1 ti + NORTH e mi Zg �E U $ H � T� Q� u ° U n Tv r4 p Zg w3 sa s �f N 3ffi O .00 cc O ca C L CL U N m � O N Co Z5 3 J U � � CD g Y T "gg Q i �g a 4 —Z.7 i I I I j i I I I I I _ — i I_ _ I I I 1 I I I I I I �I �xC1iS I �ucox¢sNwla°uxn Yxns rapxlavwr a scrnox -am Irtll a uion,c ro Ixu�o xo •oxe rwrr xr wro grate. I �I Qo,aw<x °un nro grBILK ,¢crs laawmaxrs ar gClgx s-9ae °n wo�wc w+arcrors unxm sn¢r ro rnt: e,¢owc iro rmr n16LRr Ki1%Ea ro 1nE GaW10 SIIM AS BL°°C iASMS, a0n I w° � "qus. i+n�o ° �ICCrax`"s�ms`mµu°%i eur"'�um+c�01cs. glaY,tS. leur wr EMCRab+wc a n¢ aW I Level 10 Floor Plan ems vie • ra i i i i I I I I I� I I I i -- 1 I I 1 ti + NORTH e mi Zg �E U $ H � T� Q� u ° U n Tv r4 p Zg w3 sa s �f N 3ffi O .00 cc O ca C L CL U N m � O N Co Z5 3 J U � � CD g Y T "gg Q i �g a 4 0 ORIGIMAL RE ED AIN 0 7 2000 WAN"QNIS DEPA AMENT CITY Or CLEP�- ,FAATER i • I , I Ire I �- i I � Imo' r�t �I I (�11CYI6DDNI YRl4 �1Ft1I Di SECDDN ] -YDB DEII 0. MlpWD x+ �YLOIIFS i0 IXIEMD XD YDPE MW N' Wi0 SE16�L% r Qw�.cxr wro sm¢r oars ncpwevwrs a scorn D -W! mr w�cmm vDa�cnoxs uaan sanr m n¢ eu�axc .wD xor wrcrtr unrm ro rn[ cnourm wa �s au�mc r�soRS,'ms �I I wxa a q'wm�°inrn so1wia� macc�ror�rosEm�i�° D�ro�amnwc��; s[rflrc s (eur xor umno�cnmD ox mE ttCl) I Level 11 Floor Plan i i i i i i i I I ( e CJ � 2 °s F- �a H i z� �m OLL cW. $ ¢ 111111 �w xm g T � aFL! m 3ffi c 0 U tz c a ca m m (D g 3 m cc J U � � x+ r N Q NORTH�� �ge i MR, Lit W H C= �^LLI ` S o CIL 0 I r'" I I I i � I I I I I I I ' I I � I i x i I I � � Ire I I i I I 1 1 I xra ' I i I I I r ro I I I t I i i I , I I I I I t j i I i -------------_---------- _------ -:�--- _-- _ - - - -- - I ro,as IlwnllluELtx - I (I�ewrexrtwr xet:]s emusnrxr a< srcnax ] -aoe nrlx u ruwwc e.. � x I 'fiumrr[s ro [x,ulo xo xxoxe nux x�• w,o gratac 4 axunolnoxuxr ono zrernx eaa,s eaowrmrwrs v gc,w a-am ,m ulamc rro]r NE arum sour ro me el FASW . ror aacrnr usxm ro nls amueo suat as euamxc vwwrt roar I u`,'x'nw ,x� �: ° r�"roxealors'�ro numu"Ix,o`vua s' �xxuws. Yj scrarc+s. tear xor ra+xrmnlw a,+ rx¢ aadl � i Level 12 Floor Plan';a (D NORTH 77' zg Ug F- U Q� �m O4 1 �I ji ¢m T.! 111111 >A 2a Q LL N N 3ffi O O U U ca L U cu am co 3 as U� 0 Wc. J dog N Y{ • A T E ` I N T 1gg�a, Q 4 �s 8 e-- Z uj CD U � Ut Qa cr w X U 0 j r I S-P I � I I I I I i � I I I I I I I I I I , � I I� I I I i I I I - I I IS4 I I I l e -rm i I I I I , I I I I I I 1 dd -- - -- - - -- elr�---------- - - - - -- - - ---- - - - - -- — -� Q¢I Po,ES ,eu,,,.,�E,o €I ruaamnr loxs PEOwnEd ro sErnn o -ew Pn n aawc 8S gucarcs ro muln ra uonc nux x.• No scrs�oc �I x ExnolxsnExr wro gle.cP Isms amrmlom a sEi'11oP s -me nEll • I �i uiowwc PPWFL1pNe unxm saExr xo n¢ eulnnc wo eor nPECRY NTLOD TO 111E GnIIN SWI AS BOlnl, f/565. POOP' I OYEPNTMOS. ewss, Cua6 on1En n.w rPEE scwnxc cuiaP¢s. ,uxwa. wawEES, wm onm+ solPPxx ranlmlors ro mdo IPra euenPlc sEle.o¢ fear wT EMCPOIOIwO ou na cal - . Level 13 Floor Plan NORTH finis V it • 74Y a U S 2 u "R zo h U I- T� < m �ry �a U� , U ,, � c i I'l w� =m zW SP �g aLL m 3 01 oI co U cc ca t � U m S ca '15 3 a) A a. Ch • • 0 0 ORICII4 M RECLOKED PLP:*,E -NG NPAUMENI CITY Or' CLWil A,ATER • • 1 � — i I I I ' I I I ! I I I I I ' I 1 I I I i I ' ! I ' I I , I I I I I I I I I I � I I I I I ' I I I I I I 1 I I , I I II I ' I I � ra ND I OBNLM6 il1FNf YFE15 PEDIMEYfM 6 SECIIDX S -YDB Dd D. MIdND swrts uv[t .. I F%I171D ND s10YE 1WY n' Wi0 QIBrLK I QFYCaanYlolr wro snew.x rDns uewmYUns ru sccroY a -aae na F, D'RT IYYY TO W .m.Fn YH A ro rYe a FASM A S.YD YDr RDDf I YWW,fES N!D IeF'�Y51 W� 101'EwIDBIRWSCS�A sclertYS, fear xm waD�awD w riu ttN Levels 14 -16 Floor Plans AMY �.Yy' NORTH 1 :J 2 S U z H w a U� �n U< E 3 Q�IIIIII z� w� z� �3 Q y N m O m O U_ c0 UL ca > U- U 00 cd 2 N � dl ca m c3 a) U � �J��a�Jin r 0 • 7 fi t�1 .z • 0 0 ORICIIN.161L RKOStireD jAN () 7 2008 FLA,I\l'NWG DEAC"I.sNi C 1 T Y 0r, C 1. W.,, WA.T E R i Levels 1 -3: Decorative Precas Panels Aluminum Railing System Powder Coaled Aluminum Brackets Precast Concrete Sills Curtainwoll Glazing System Insulated 'Low E Glazing Organically coaled Standing Seam Metal Roofing Awnings Levels 4 —I6: Cement Plaster Wall Finish System Iruulaled 'Low E' gI.frg Aluminum Roiling System Fixed and Operable Aluminum Window System Aluminum Shutters Powder Coated Aluminum Brackets Standing Seom Metal Roofing Awnings Standing Seom Awnings Aluminum Eybrow Awning System Color Legend: (1� Aged Ivory SW 2450 Egret White SW 2004 3 Cottage Cream SW 2347 4 Wedding White SW 1913 5 Arboretum SW 2232 6 Sea Moss SW 2366 See Building Materiols/Testuro /Color Chart with color somples in package NOTE 1. ADHERANCE TO BEACH BY DESIGN SECTION C ITEM 3 HAS BEEN CALCULATED ON REPRESENTATIVE SECTIONS OF THE ELEVATION. CURRENTLY THE PERCENTAGE OF WINDOWS AND ARCHITECTURAL DECORATION EXCEE05 THE 60% REQUIRED. 2. BEACH BY DESIGN SECTION C ITEM 2 REQUIRES THAT 'NO PLANE OF A BUILDING MAY CONTINUE UNITERRUPTED FOR GREATER THAN ONE HUNDRED LINEAR FEET (1000. FOR THE PURPOSE OF THE STANDARD INTERRUPTED MEANS ON OFFSET OF GREATER THAN FIVE FEET THIS ROJECT RECESSES OCCUR IN THE FACADE TYPICALLY ON A TWENTY EIGHT FOOT (28 ) North Elevation Scads 1/16' • TQ NOTE: 1. 'Beach by Design' requires that at least sixty percent (60X) of any elevation will be covered with windows or arahilacloral decoration. For this elevation the summary is os follows' Total of Windows or Architectural Decoration: 27.319 SF Total Am of Building Facade 43.635 SF Percentage Windows or Architectural Decoration: 62.6X o� �d as e Va z§ V� W a U� n m U$ w� ao z� IIIIII Z 72 3 z� U- f n no yno D O v L) U co C CC @ O � 7 O o (� L O Z as -xa, r W. L0 HIM Q �g i 9 0 0 0 RE jAIN 0 7 2008 DEPAZ,,,rmFN" c fl W 0T- C L WAX E R' • Levels 1 -3: Decorative Precast Panels Aluminum Railing System Powder Cooled Aluminum Brackets Precast Concrale Tills Curtain—` Glazing System Insulated 'Law E' Glazing Organically coaled Standing Seom Metal Roofing Awnings Levels 4 -16: Cement Ploster Wall Finish System Insulated 'Low E' glazing Aluminum Roiling System Fixed and operable Aluminum Window System Aluminum Shuttem Powder Cooled Aluminum Brackets Standing Seom Metal Roofing Awnings Standing Seom Awnings Aluminum Eybrow Awning System Color Legend 1 Aged Ivory SW 2450 2 Egret While SW 2004 3 Cottage Cream SW 2347 4 Wedding Whim SW 1913 5 Arboretum SW 2232 6 1ea Mass SW 2366 See Building Moteriab/Textu— /Color Chart with color samples in package NOTE: 1. ADHERANCE TO BEACH BY DESIGN SECTION C ITEM 3 HAS BEEN CALCULATED ON REPRESENTATIVE SECTIONS OF THE ELEVATION. CURRENTLY THE PERCENTAGE OF WINDOWS NOTE: AND ARCHITECTURAL DECORATION EXCEEDS THE 60% REQUIRED. 1. 'Beach by Design' requires that at least sixty percent (60t) f any elevation will be 2. BEACH BY DESIGN SECTION C ITEM 2 REQUIRES THAT "NO PLANE OF A BUILDING MAY CONTINUE UNITERRUPTED FOR GREATER THAN ONE HUNDRED LINEAR FEET (100'). FOR THE South Elevation ovA,.d with window. or architectural decoration. follows: Far this elevation the summary is a. PURPOSE OF THE STANDARD INTERRUPTED MEANS ON OFFSET OF GREATER THAN FIVE FEET Tolol Are of Windows or Architectural Decoration: 20,910 SF (5'). FOR THIS PROJECT RECESSES OCCUR IN THE FACADE TYPICALLY ON A TWENTY EIGHT Talal Area of Building Facade 31,634 SF FOOT (28') INTERVAL VXT . 3cals TIT Percentage Windows or Architectural Decoration: 66.1% e U� z_o UE IS W IS U� Y� Ue OLL Um < am IIIIII �W w E IIIIII T S qAg Qm Q LL a 3 m O c m O v U ro L U C ro a) O , ca m ro o 7 3 U � F rx N LO s ORIGINAL P,Ecw-,qm. 'AN 0 7 2008 pvvN!4W`G DEPARNIENT CITE or- CU P�MWER 0 9 Level9 1 -3: Decorative Proms[ Panels Aluminum Railing System Powder Cooled Aluminum Brackets Precast Concrete Sins Curtainwall Glazing System Insulated 'Law E' Glazing Organically cooled Standing Seam Metal Roofing Awnings Levele 4 -16: Cement Plaster Wall Finish System Insulated 'Low E' glazing Aluminum Railing System Fixed and Operable Aluminum Window System Aluminum Shutters Powder Coaled Aluminum Brackets Standing Seam Metal Roaring Awnings Standing Seem Awnings Aluminum Eybrow Awning System Color Legend: Agetl Ivory SW 2450 Egret While SW 2004 3 Cot to e Cream SW 2347 4 Wedding White SW 1913 5 Arboretum SW 2232 6 Seo Moss SIN 2366 see Bonding Materials/Texlures /Color Chart with color samples in package NOTE I. ADHERANCE TO BEACH BY DESIGN SECTION C ITEM 3 HAS BEEN CALCULATED ON REPRESENTATIVE SECTIONS OF THE ELEVATION. CURRENTLY THE PERCENTAGE OF WINDOWS AND ARCHITECTURAL DECORATION EXCEEDS THE BOX REQUIRED. 2. BEACH BY DESIGN SECTION C ITEM 2 REQUIRES THAT NO PLANE OF A BUILDING MAY CONTINUE UNITERRUPTED FOR GREATER THAN ONE HUNDRED LINEAR FEET (100'). FOR THE PURPOSE OF THE STANDARD INTERRUPTED MEANS ON OFFSET OF GREATER THAN FIVE FEET (5'). FOR THIS PROJECT RECESSES OCCUR IN THE FACADE TYPICALLY ON A TWENTY EIGHT FOOT (28') INTERVAL West Elevation Scale, 1 • T-0' NOTE: 1. 'Beach by Design' requires that at least sixty percent (60x) of any elevation will be Bred with windows or architectural decoration. For this elevation the summary ie as follows: Total Area of Windows or Architectural Decoration: 22,458. SF Total Area of Building Facade 32,660 SF Percentage Windows or Architectural D— ration;_ 68.8% x a V� z� Us W a F- z U� r \ n x n Ua Om IIII oW..a � zLL 111111 w �i zm 3 a LL U) V no C: 9 O O U U ro U M 0 N M N o 01 �3 3 U � a E d' 8y �D _ s 0 0 0 0 ti AN AN 0 7 2008 WENY W Levels 1 -3: DecomCrve Precast Panels Aluminum Railing System Powder Cooled Aluminum Brackets Precost Concrete Sills Curtainwoll Glazing System Insulated 'Law E' Glazing Organically tooted Standing Seam Metal Roofing Awnings Levels 4 -16: Cement Plaster Wall Finish System Insulated 'Low E' glazing Aluminum Roiling System Fixed and Operable Aluminum Window System Aluminum Shanere Powder Cooled Aluminum Brackets Standing Seom Metal Roofing Awnings Standing Seam Awnings Aluminum Eybrow Awning System Color Legend f1) Aged Ivory SW 2450 2 Egret White SW 2004 3 Cottage Creom SW 2347 4 Wedding White SW 1913 5 Arboretum SW 2232 6 Sea Moe. SW 2366 See Building Moterials/Tezlures /Color Chart with color samples in package NOTE: 1. ADHERANCE TO BEACH BY DESIGN SECTION C REM 3 HAS BEEN CALCULATED ON REPRESENTATIVE SECTIONS OF THE ELEVATION. CURRENTLY THE PERCENTAGE OF WINDOWS AND ARCHITECTURAL DECORATION EXCEEDS THE 60% REQUIRED. 2. BEACH BY DESIGN SECTION C REM 2 REQUIRES THAT 'NO PLANE OF A BUILDING MAY CONTINUE UNITERRUPTED FOR GREATER THAN ONE HUNDRED LINEAR FEET (100'). FOR THE PURPOSE OF THE STANDARD INTERRUPTED MEANS ON OFFSET OF GREATER THAN FIVE FEET (5'). FOR THIS PROJECT RECESSES OCCUR IN THE FACADE TYPICALLY ON A TWENTY EIGHT FOOT (28') INTERVAL East Elevation S.I. V16' • 7-0' NOTE: 1. Beach by Design requires that at least sixty percent (6D;) of any elevation will be covered with wInd,,s or architectural decoration. For this elevation the summary is os fall. -: Total Area of Windows or Architectural Decoration: 21,408 SF Total Area of Building Facade 30,255 SF Percentage Windows or Architectuml Decoration: 70.7% U � Z� Us Y. ul d F o U� Q� \ m U, C": r a xa Ng x Q LL t U L � � m 3m O� c m .00 U Ell L U R! O c N MO a N o W O N W U � � F�ati Cr) Q dgs d 0 '19 ORK-7110- REwAsICAMD JAM 0 7 2008 �-LAN'43,,'G DEPOc7,RAF',4T c;,w or. CLf**,wATFp 0 s z a a to I n, E ` n jf I m _ y ! Ill U1 -- ® U - -- i .. e w 7 m Cj QD � ( m 10 C3 00 _ a W ������ POOL I Building Section ® Pool 6GI61/o . T-W f 2 a 1 5 6 ) a 9 16 m 31%4 vml ) 40 Jj]o iNJYVf,42-W"-4fj �)If �,, 1 eVlj ,14 gooz L cl or 0 0 4) 0 North Elevation ft.k Y32. }.p East Eleva -ion ft.w V37.fV South Elevation West Elevation B..k,w.T.r M® v� Z8 vi * U wa z� U 4 �1 U< OLL z� J £ GL E Z m a� t O� c m ca O 0 ca U (0 L y (UO O N T o ca CO 3 U � $ s Q u • . 0 MGM). PECOM, 7 2000 pirV?t,PP 'It. 1q, DF-PNUMEW CITY OFCLFA-i1XATER 0 View From Northwest SI.S. „37 .,-T t :;. ec r �+ m vtnr er.x�a View From Gulf S..).VW -I-M View From Northeast View From Southeast � �' d aau' ;r � '�"^:x t, ;'yA mac• � Xise:' 3: li 'ew' IA " �A�31 View From Northeast View From Southeast 0 0 • 0 CITY Or -,C�LPWA Clearwater Beach Vacation Ownership Project 430 South Gulfview Boulevard Building Materials/Textures /Color The-building fagade has 3 colors decreasing in tone as they progress vertically. The colors placement compliments the breakdown of the building massing. Area 1 Base Aged Ivory SW 2450 Area 2 Base Egret White SW 2004 Area 3 Middle Cottage Cream SW 2347 Area 4 Top & Presidential Units Cottage Cream SW 2347 Further, building trim elements are detailed in shades of white to accent the detail of the structure. Area5 Trim Wedding White SW 1913 Area 6 Roof Elements Arboretum SW 2232 and trim elements Area 7 Railings Aluminum cap -white picket and horiz. rail Area 8 Door /Window Frames Wedding White SW 1913 Area 9 Shutters /Louvers Sea Moss SW 2366 Area 10 Accents at Entry /Columns Florida cut Limestone natural veneer Area 11 Banding /Moldings Wedding White SW 1913 ORIGINAL RECEIVED DEC 13 2007 PLANNING DEW Nv,Effl CIiYOF CLEARWAYER � M s • Aged Ivory SW 2450 Egret White SW 2004 Building Base Building Base Cottage Cream SW 2347 Building Body Wedding White SW 1913 Trim- Window Frames - holdings Arboretum SW 2232 Roof Elements Sea Moss SW 2366 Shutters /Louvers ORIGINAL RECEIVED DEC 13 2007 PLANNING DEPARItVENI CIiYOF CLEARwATEi - '�y�'r' �; '4', DEG -6 2901 12s 3'ti F Rfi3 ; TR'F --IM PRtM 7&�s6&4461 Ttir. P, 3 +; iiANNING DEPhk�t,� MOF CLWWAtEP 250 22. 201 17; 15( L N 12; i IL 10C 75 50 25 0 0 450 750 1050 • • Clearwater Beach Vacation Ownership 430 South Gulfview Boulevard Wadsworth O'Neal Bacik Engineers 12/12/2007 GINAL iNED 3 2007 DEPARTMENT LEARWATER 1350 1500 1650 1800 1950 2100 2250 2400 2550 2700 2850 Flow (gpm) Flow Curve.grf i 3 i 666 I 6 1,0 0 9P m at 74 ps ; G 1,0(0 g m at 1 psi I 4 j I € e � k De an Cury I 41:4 Flow at -Pum. iseh -a tat c = 8 r si s = , gp a r psi_ OR( RE .I DEC *FI(w = 1,6100 gpm at 55 psi , EIANNIN k' Flow= 2,4 1 gpm z t 20 psi .,.....�iv..+r,..�.....,... m.. ui.»«w «.r E at 5 a ow P p su(!!�j iewmwn.i. \ .rr..xw ,... ww�.v..nv_...i— ity ,.......e.. Main e+r.:......m..m. s I ; GINAL iNED 3 2007 DEPARTMENT LEARWATER 1350 1500 1650 1800 1950 2100 2250 2400 2550 2700 2850 Flow (gpm) Flow Curve.grf • • l2 f �Z�Zv�'7 Mr. Jones, Please review the following results reported to US Water Services from the City Of Clearwater's Water department. Location: 430 Gulf view Blvd Hydrant #: 3 Static: 78 psi Flow: 1,200 gpm Residual: 63 psi Pitot: 51 psi The hydrant tested is fed by an 8" water main and is a looped system. I will forward the field result sheets from the City of Clearwater to your attention tomorrow. Lee Penick Project Manager US Water Services Corporation 4939 Cross Bayou Blvd. New Port Richey, FL -34652 ORIGINAL RECEIVED DEC 13 2007 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CffYOF CLEARWATER 12/14/2007 09:38 72784942 12/13/2007 09:12 '1276624961 CU'7nMlik $i[RViCE To Whom 1t Mgy Concern: US WATER SERVICES . PAGE 02/04 PUBLIC UTIL ITIE 5 PALE 02 II CITY,OF CLEARWAT.ER' Posy Owca Box 4748, Cia4mm, now, 337%- 47411 M=Cilw SfawoRQ YX- navw,, 10D 5 ma M+7 nzAvww., Surn no, r-wwm 337% ria.mi ms (129} %Z400 W M115 562.-%29 Plgase complete the following information below to scheduio a hydrant flow 1 $50•.00 fir each hydMnz Wind: � Company Name V .S V4 k-0- r Ss,►��'I c 7 � .. Agate of hydrzmt test: 1Vbilfng addles:;. "11 e vSf A-Amr 161-e; lye— Telephone number: C7;0/-4/0 - JVX6 FaX womber_ Hydrant 41 location ljrformsdnn: Nydrant A2 loeatfor hitomatlon: 1� , Rydratnt #3 locz0on 9nformatlon:Y Hydrant 44 location wormation k 5inczmly, Customer ReprosentAtivC "rsVc'atr, Fa�iar,:m�r�• 4NnAFhiiaat7n4; �►crrrnr r.M�ics�rt" ,. The Dow test foe is 4 P14r ; 91-CO ORIGINAL RECEIVED DEC 13 2007 Received Time Dec 14.. 10:45AM PLANNING DEPAtt'irVit +vT CITY OF CLEARWATEt? 12/14/2007 09:38 7278494 12/13/2007 09 ;12 7275624951 US WATER SERVICES PUBLIC UTILITIES PAGE 03/04 PAOE ,03 FLOW TEST CRY OF CLEARWATER WATER DEPARTMENT LOCA O e � � � • �. '� DA'>i 9 OF TEST_ . �. - -- I Psi If— LL off RESIDUAL PSI. FLOW GPM.�C.7i IHWRANT.# IGRID# ...__ _�__. .._�.... ._ _._,...... iml-sc., (AS (Jjoter 5eru i O--e CUSTOMER REQUESTING TEST „_„__ ,,,,,,,,,, ORIGINAL RECEIVED Received Time Dec. 14 10:45AM DEC 13 2007 PLANNING DEPARjmNj COY OF CLEARWATER 12/14/2007 09:38 7278494 ' 12(13I20A7 09:12 7275524961 coy of Clearwater US WATER SERVICES PUBLIC UTILITIES Flow Te5>+ ial�a /o� fi(�eh Received Time Dec 14 10:45AM PAGE 04/04 PAGE 04 Page I oec 11,2007114:47 x -11-07 R:' THE AnAMY MARK HOT46,1 ORIGINAL RECEIVED DEC 13 2007 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER Hy&nt Test Service Order _ . " .. onCodF FH'�'ST s ction: 773004 Flffbotive Date: Dee - 12-2007 Distribution; WATER Customer: 2144R5] US WATER SERVICES. CORP. phoncnumbot(s); BUS 727•,848 -8292 Phonetumber(s): CELI, 727.487 -3026 Eat lee Phone number: FAX 127.845 -7701 _ _ Account; 4150899 US WATER STRV>iCT%9, co". I >BA Cnmmatt; PL BASE TEST HYDRANT a@, N E CORNER OT PROPERTY- 430 G(ILFT17EW BLYI) ( FORM! CONTACT [,EE PEMCK @ a87 -302 6 C'USTPATD $30,.00 Flow Te5>+ ial�a /o� fi(�eh Received Time Dec 14 10:45AM PAGE 04/04 PAGE 04 Page I oec 11,2007114:47 x -11-07 R:' THE AnAMY MARK HOT46,1 ORIGINAL RECEIVED DEC 13 2007 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER PUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATION April 4, 2005 Octavio Cabrera, P.E. Florida Design Consultants, Inc. 3030 Starkey Boulevard Nexv Port Richey, FL 34655 1 E(" 111 . 10.01 V pG<,"- CITY OF CLEARWATER POST OFFICE BOX 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758 -4748 TELEPHONE (727) 562 -4750 FAX (727) 562 -4755 . Re: Ability to Serve 430 South Gulfview proposed 150 -160 unit condominium Dear Mr. Cabrera: Please be advised that the City of Clearwater has adequate capacity to serve and will provide sewer and water service to the above referenced property. For contact information, please refer to my business card attached. Sincerely, Stephen L. Doherty Public Works Administration Attch. 0 m ® rrj UP 7 ;1 ORIGINAL RECEIVED DEC 13 2007 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER >c c . 1AzI v,,&V v, , Ta i BRIAN J. ALINGST, MAYOR FRANK HIIMARD, VICE MAYOR HOPI' HA.4IILTON, COUNCILMEMBER I31LI. JONSON, COUNCILS'IEMBER ® CARLEN A. PETERSEN, COUNCIUMEMBER "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACPION EMPLOYER" • • REVIEW OF NEED FOR A TRAFFIC STUDY FOR THE CLEARWATER BEACH VACATION OWNERSHIP PROJECT DEVELOPMENT IN THE CITY OF CLEARWATER Introduction: The Clearwater Beach Vacation Ownership Project development is located on Clearwater Beach at the site of the previous Adams Mark Hotel. The Adams Mark Hotel consisted of a 217 -room hotel, while the proposed Clearwater Beach Vacation Ownership Project development will contain a 230 -room hotel. The City of Clearwater has a requirement to complete a traffic study if the proposed project will generate over 1,000 daily trips or 100 trips in the peak hour. Trip Generation Comparison: A comparison has been between the trips generated in the before and after conditions to determine whether a traffic study is needed. Information from the Institute of Transportation Engineers Informational Report Trip Generation, Seventh Edition, 2003, was used to develop the following table: Development Adams Mark Clearwater Beach Vacation Ownership Project Increase ITE LUC Size Daily AM Peak Hour 310 217 Rooms 1,936 139 310 230 Rooms 2,052 150 116 11 PM Peak Hour 135 145 10 Since the net increase in trips is only 116 on a daily basis and 11 maximum on a peak hour basis and these volumes are significantly below the threshold to require a traffic study in The City of Clearwater, no traffic study should be required. Conclusion: As indicated above, the increase in trips from expanding the hotel on the Clearwater Beach Vacation Ownership Project site from its previous amount of 217 -rooms to the proposed 230 -rooms results in fewer trips than would be required to justify a traffic study of the project's impacts. Therefore, no traffic study should be required. Respectfully Submitted, Roy E. 71L apman, E. Vice P ident of Transportation Florida Design Consultants, Inc. 3030 Starkey Boulevard New Port Richey, Florida 34655 Phone: (727) 849 -7588 pernK: \Clearwater Beach Vacation Ownership \Reports \Review of Need for a Traffic Study.doc ® m rp �M C ®� M M 0 0 ORIGINAL RECSVED 02 2907 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER Clearwater Beach Vacation Ownership Project Master Drainage Report City of Clearwater Pinellas County, FLORIDA Prepared for: Taylor Woodrow -US Tower Division ' 8430 Enterprise Circle Suite 100 Bradenton, Florida 34202 1 November 2007 ORIGINAL REC VED 1. -T 02 2007 CITY OF LEARWATER fiPs i FLORIDA D SON CONSULTAM, INC. ENGINEERS, ENVIRONMENTALIST'S, SURVEYORS & PLANNERS 3030 Starkey Blvd ' •Oc�+o��br�a New Port Richey, FL 34655ttr::r w • 0010V�'V`f 2007 _ Job 9699 -271 •.F i~N '146Q, Table of Contents: I. Narrative II. Proposed Conditions CN, Input Data and Nodal Map III. Proposed Conditions ICPR Output IV. Required Treatment Volume V. Filter Drawdown Analysis VI. Appendix Aerial Soil Survey Map USGS Quadrangle Map FIRM Map Post - Developed Basin Map ORIGINAL REC'VE® [ ° {', 02 2001 PLANNfi G DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER • I. Drainage Report Narrative • 1 0 0 ' DRAINAGE REPORT PREFACE General Overview: The proposed Clearwater Beach Vacation Ownership Project consists of two towers (one tower is 150 feet, one is 100 feet) located above a three story parking garage. The proposed project is located on the site of the former Adams Mark Hotel. The parcel is located on a 2.45 acre (1.87 acre landward of seawall) site in Pinellas County (Section 7, Township 29, Range 15 East). The parcel is located toward the southern end of Clearwater Beach, between Gulfview Boulevard and the Gulf of Mexico. 230 hotel (timeshare) units are proposed for the site. Soil Survey Information: According to the SCS Soil Survey of Pinellas County, Florida, the soils found onsite are Coastal Beach (Co). See attached Soils Map. ' Flood Zone Information: According to FEMA Flood Information Rate Map panels 12103CO102G and 12103C0104G, the project is located within the AE (Elev. 12 NGVD, VE (Elev. 14 NGVD) and VE (Elev. 16 NGVD) flood zones. See attached FIRM Map and Boundary Survey. Existing Conditions: The proposed site was most recently utilized as the 13 -story Adams Mark Hotel which has been demolished. The driveways to the site are on Gulfview Boulevard. The current hotel provides no treatment or attenuation and the site's existing conditions were not analyzed. The eastern portion of the site currently drains to the City's Stormwater System, either by pipe or sheet flow. The western portion of the site drains over the sea wall and into the Gulf. ' Proposed Conditions: The proposed project will have an underground stormwater vault, located under the ramp below parking level 1. All roof runoff will be routed to the vault. The stormwater system will treat the ' first 3 /a" of runoff because the system discharges to an Outstanding Florida Water. For this 1.87 acre project site (the buildable area landward of the sea wall) the required treatment volume is 5091 cubic feet. The water quality treatment is achieved by effluent filtration (filter drain). The ' treatment occurs between elevations 2.37 and 4.87. A filter length of 28 feet is required to draw down the treatment volume within the allotted 24 hour time frame (per City of Clearwater Criteria). The floor drains from the three parking levels are connected to a grease and oil separator before discharging to the vault. The filter system is located outside of the building and is covered by concrete slabs that can.be removed for replacement of the filter. material. The proposed Stormwater System will collect runoff from the entire site, landward of the sea wall, and. ultimately discharge the runoff into the Gulf of Mexico. The peak stormwater discharge for the 25- year /24 -hour storm is 7.90 cfs, and will pass (through the seawall) at a point landward of the Coastal Construction Control Line (CCCL). Operation and Maintenance: The owner of the property will be responsible for operating and maintaining the proposed stormwater system. Attached is a copy of the letter outlining the operation and maintenance responsibilities, that was mailed to the owner. KAClearwater Beach Vacation Ownership \Reports \Drainage Report Preface.doc I, � • s II. Proposed Conditions CN, Input Data and Nodal Map t J • Runoff Curve Numbers Project: Clearwater Beach Vacation Ownership Project Location: Clearwater Beach - Pinellas County Basin Onsite Area HSG CN Impervious 1.87 AC C 98 RESULTS: AREA= 1.87 AC CN= 98.0 • By: OC/BKF Date: 1012412007 Job # 699 -271 EPN 209 1 • 9 ' Clearwater Beach Vacation Ownership Project 25 year /24 hour 10/24/07 Basins ______ ---------------------------- _____________ _______________________________ Interconnected Channel and Pond Routing Model (ICPR) 02002 Streamline Technologies, Inc. Page 1 of 3 Name: Onsite Node: Vault Status: Onsite _______________________________ Group: BASE Type: SCS Unit Hydrograph OCS Unit Hydrograph: Uh256 Peaking Factor: 256.0 Rainfall File: Flmod Storm Duration(hrs): 24.00 Count: Rainfall Amount(in): 9.000 Time of Conc(min): 15.00 UPSTREAM Area(ac): 1.870 Time Shift(hrs): 0.00 Curve Number: 98.00 Max Allowable Q(cfs): 999999.000 Solution Algorithm: DCIA( %): 0.00 Span(in): 18.00 Nodes =____________________________________________ Flow: _______________________________ Rise(in): 18.00 18.00 Entrance Loss Coef: Name: Gulf Base Flow(cfs): 0.000 Init Stage(ft): 1.620 1.500 Group: BASE Exit Loss Coef: Warn Stage(ft): 3.000 Type: Time /Stage - - -- Time(hrs) - - - Stage(ft) ' 0.00 1.620 12.00 1.620 30.00 1.620 1 - - - -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Name: Vault Base Flow(cfs): 0.000 Init Stage(ft): 4.870 Group: BASE Warn Stage(ft): 6.000 Type: Stage /Area Stage(ft) Area(ac) --------- - - - - -- --------------- 4.870 0.0470 ------ - - - -6- 000= = ==== = = = =0. 0470 ------------- ______________ ___ .......... __________________ Pipes Name: From Node: Length(ft): 0.00 ' Group: BASE To Node: Count: 1 Friction Equation: Average Conveyance UPSTREAM DOWNSTREAM Solution Algorithm: Automatic Geometry: Circular Circular Flow: Both Span(in): 0.00 0.00 Entrance Loss Coef: 0.00 Rise(in): 0.00 0.00 Exit Loss Coef: 0.00 Invert(ft): 0.000 0.000 Bend Loss Coef: 0.00 Manning's N: 0.000000 0.000000 Outlet Ctrl Spec: Use do or tw Top Clip(in): 0.000 0.000 Inlet Ctrl Spec: Use do Bot Clip(in): 0.000 0.000 Stabilizer Option: None Upstream FHWA Inlet Edge Description: Circular Concrete: Square edge w/ headwall ' Downstream FHWA Inlet Edge Description: Circular Concrete: Square edge w/ headwall Interconnected Channel and Pond Routing Model (ICPR) 02002 Streamline Technologies, Inc. Page 1 of 3 = = == =Drop - Structures ___ _ _____ _ ____°_________=__________ _______________________________ Name: OCS From Node: Vault Length(ft): 199.00 Group: BASE To Node: Gulf Count: 1 ' UPSTREAM DOWNSTREAM Friction Equation: Average Conveyance Geometry: Circular Circular Solution Algorithm: Automatic Span(in): 18.00 18.00 Flow: Both Rise(in): 18.00 18.00 Entrance Loss Coef: 0.500 Invert (ft ) : 1.500 1.500 Exit Loss Coef: 0.500 Interconnected Channel and Pond Routing Model (ICPR) 02002 Streamline Technologies, Inc. Page 1 of 3 1 • ' Clearwater Beach Vacation Ownership Project 25 year /24 hour 10/24/07 Hydrology Simulations Manning's N: 0.012000 0.012000 Outlet Ctrl Spec: Use do or tw ' Top Clip(in): 0.000 0.000 Inlet Ctrl Spec: Use do Bot Clip(in): 0.000 0.000 Solution Incs: 10 Rainfall File: Flmod Upstream FHWA Inlet Edge Description: Rainfall Amount(in): 9.00 Circular Concrete: Square edge w/ headwall Time(hrs) Print Inc(min) Downstream FHWA Inlet Edge Description: Routing Simulations Circular Concrete: Square edge w/ headwall ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ' * ** Weir 1 of 1 for Drop Structure OCS * ** Name: Post25 Hydrology Sim: Post25 Filename: K:\ 209\ ProjData \DrnData \ICPR \Post25.I32 TABLE Patch: No Count: 1 Bottom Clip(in): 0.000 Type: Vertical: Mavis Top Clip(in): 0.000 Time Step Optimizer: 10.000 Flow: Both Weir Disc Coef: 3.200 End Time(hrs): 30.00 Geometry: Rectangular Orifice Disc Coef: 0.600 Span(in): 72.00 Invert(ft): 4.870 Rise(in): 999.00 Control Elev(ft): 4.870 _____________________________ Weirs _______________________________ Name: From Node: ' Group: BASE To Node: Flow: Both Count: 1 Type: Horizontal Geometry: Circular Span(in): 0.00 Rise(in): 0.00 Invert(ft): 0.000 Control Elevation(ft): 0.000 TABLE Bottom Clip(in): 0.000 . Top Clip(in): 0.000 Weir Discharge Coef: 3.200 Orifice Discharge Coef: 0.600 Hydrology Simulations ' Interconnected Channel and Pond Routing Model (ICPR) 02002 Streamline Technologies, Inc. Page 2 of 3 Name: Post25 Filename: K:\ 209\ ProjData \DrnData \ICPR \Post25.R32 Override Defaults: Yes Storm Duration(hrs): 24.00 Rainfall File: Flmod Rainfall Amount(in): 9.00 Time(hrs) Print Inc(min) --------- - - - - -- --------------- 30.000 15.00 Routing Simulations ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Name: Post25 Hydrology Sim: Post25 Filename: K:\ 209\ ProjData \DrnData \ICPR \Post25.I32 Execute: Yes Restart: No Patch: No Alternative: No Max Delta Z(ft): 1.00 Delta Z Factor: 0.00500 Time Step Optimizer: 10.000 Start Time(hrs): 0.000 End Time(hrs): 30.00 Min Calc Time(sec): 0.5000 Max Calc Time(sec): 30.0000 Boundary Stages: Boundary Flows: ' Time(hrs) Print Inc(min) --------------- --------- - - -- -- 30.000 15.000 Group Run ' Interconnected Channel and Pond Routing Model (ICPR) 02002 Streamline Technologies, Inc. Page 2 of 3 0 0 Clearwater Beach Vacation Ownership Project 25 year /24 hour 10/24/07 BASE Yes Boundary Conditions __________________________________ _______________________________ Interconnected Channel and Pond Routing Model (ICPR) ©2002 Streamline Technologies, Inc. Page 3 of 3 Clearwater Beach Vacation Ownership Project 25 year /24 hour 10/24/07 Nodes A Stage /Area V Stage /Volume T Time /Stage M Manhole Basins 0 Overland Flow U SCS Unit Hydro S Santa Barbara Links P Pipe W Weir C Channel D Drop Structure B Bridge R Rating Curve H Breach Interconnected Channel and Pond Routing Model (ICPR) 02002 Streamline Technologies, Inc. Cl • 1 III. Proposed Conditions ICPR Runoff Output 0 n 0 i = i = M M M M == M == M == M= M Clearwater Beach Vacation Ownership Project 25 year /24 hour 10/24/07 Max Time Max Warning Max Delta Max Surf Max Time Max Max Time Max Name Group Simulation Stage Stage Stage Stage Area Inflow Inflow Outflow Outflow hrs ft ft ft ft2 hrs cfs hrs cfs Gulf BASE Post25 0.00 1.620 3.000 0.0000 0 12.05 7.900 0.00 0.000 Vault BASE Post25 12.05 5.423 6.000 0.0048 2047 12.00 8.025 12.05 7.900 • • Interconnected Channel and Pond Routing Model (ICPR) 02002 Streamline Technologies, Inc. Page 1 of 1 0 0 IV. Required Treatment Volume 0 • Clearwater Beach Vacation Ownership Project Required Treatment Volume October 15, 2007 Required Treatment of 3/4" per Acre Vault Area: Required Treatment for 1.87 Acres= 5091.08 ft' 2040 ft2 Treatment Depth: 5091 ft3/2040 ft2 Elev. at Top of Treatment: 2.5 +2.37 4.87 ft 2.50 ft • V. Filter Drawdown Analysis • = = = = = = s = = = = = = = = = M Clearwater Beach Vacation Ownership Project - Vault SIDE -DRAIN FILTER DRAWDOWN ANALYSIS E h ^h NGVD TOTAL INCR. 4.87 3.25 XXXXXXXX 2.00 XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX 2.00 0.25 4.62 3.00 XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX 0.25 4.37 2.75 XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX 4,590 XXXXXXXX 0.25 4.12 2.50 XXXXXXXX 2.00 XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX 91.0 0.25 3.87 2.25 XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX 0.25 3.62 2.00 XXXXXXXX 4,080 XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX 2.00 0.25 3.37 1.75 XXXXXXXX 84.0 XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX 0.25 3.12 1.50 XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX 0.25 2.87 1.25 XXXXXXXX 2.00 XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX 2.00 0.25 2.62 1.00 XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX 0.25 2.37 0.75 XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX V ^V Lmin Lmax Lavg HYD. AREA FLOW TOTAL INCR. GRAD. FILTER Q =KIA 5,100 XXXXXXXX 2.00 2.00 2.00 1.6250 98.0 863.1 XXXXXXXX 510 XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX 573.8 4,590 XXXXXXXX 2.00 2.00 2.00 1.5000 91.0 739.8 XXXXXXXX 510 XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX 4,080 XXXXXXXX 303.5 2.00 2.00 2.00 1.3750 84.0 626.0 XXXXXXXX 510 XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX 3,570 XXXXXXXX 2.00 2.00 2.00 1.2500 77.0 521.7 XXXXXXXX 510 XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX 3,060 XXXXXXXX 2.00 2.00 2.00 1.1250 70.0 426.8 XXXXXXXX 510 XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX 2,550 XXXXXXXX 2.00 2.00 2.00 1.0000 63.0 341.5 XXXXXXXX 510 XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX 2,040 XXXXXXXX 2.00 2.00 2.00 0.8750 56.0 265.6 XXXXXXXX 510 XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX 1,530 XXXXXXXX 2.00 2.00 2.00 0.7500 49.0 199.2 XXXXXXXX 510 XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX 1,020 XXXXXXXX 2.00 2.00 2.00 0.6250 42.0 142.3 XXXXXXXX 510 XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX 510 XXXXXXXX 2.00 2.00 2.00 0.5000 35.0 94.9 XXXXXXXX 510 XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX 0 XXXXXXXX 2.00 2.00 2.00 0.3750 28.0 56.9 4.87 DLW (TOP OF TREATMENT VOLUME) 2.37 NWL (BOTTOM OF TREATMENT VOLUME) 1.62 ELEVATION OF CENTERLINE OF PIPE 2040 AREA @ DLW (s.f.) 2040 AREA @ NWL(s.f.) 2 L min 2 L max 5.42 "K" (f. /hr.) 28 REQUIRED UNDERDRAIN LENGTH 22.6 TIME FOR SYSTEM TO DRAW DOWN (24 HOURS BASED ON CITY OF CLEARWATER CRITERIA) Florida Design Consultants, New Port Richey FL 10/29/2007 11:38 AM Mirasol Vault 10 -15 AVG. AT ET FLOW INCR. TOTAL XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX 0.0 801.5 0.6 XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX 0.6 682.9 0.7 XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX 1.4 573.8 0.9 XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX 2.3 474.3 1.1 XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX 3.3 384.1 1.3 XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX 4.7 303.5 1.7 XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX 6.4 232.4 2.2 XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX 8.5 170.7 3.0 XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX 11.5 118.6 4.3 XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX 15.8 75.9 6.7 XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX 22.6 • 0 VI. Appendix I I 11 L Caladesi Isl�nd State Park J 3 L � C7 699 SITE ti Bell Mehlenbacher 8th Belleair ffekh Belleair Bluffs Belleair Shore ath 576 it Court Dunedin a Lakeview m Y i ^ A LargoN, V- a --- CLEARWATER BEACH VACATION OWNERSHIP PROJECT GIS Data LOCATION MAP This drawing is comprised of data obtained from a variety of sources. It is for information purposes only and is not to be considered comprehensive for site - specific data 1 inch equals 1 mile N A WMMWAoMUtWM1x ,r ! 4. ,r r bEV0 DR, f L� 4 fi. • . �, t All r � v � CLEARWATER BEACH I inch equals 300 feet N VACATION OWNERSHIP PROJECT A GIS Data AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH This drawing is comprised of data obtained from a variety of sources. It is for information purposes only and is not to be eOKWODOM M considered comprehensive for site - specific data. s 0 009 [099', 022 n7 055 CLEARWATER BEACH VACATION OWNERSHIP PROJECT GIS Data SOILS MAP This drawing is comprised of data obtained from a variety of sources. It is for information purposes only and is not to be considered comprehensive for site - specific data 099 099 099 1 inch equals 300 feet N A -.,r Beac • a tit V. r t 4 '- N. •',, r � 4 i CLEARWATER BEACH VACATION OWNERSHIP PROJECT GIS Data USGS QUAD MAP This drawing is comprised of data obtained from a variety of sources. It is for information purposes only and is not to be considered comprehensive for site - specific data. w r , 1 inch equals 600 feet N A Rao�o�rrmrarnrarrrs, WC APPROXIMATE SCALE 500 o bcr .- ZONE-`AE. (EL 12) — — — — - — , — isr sr -- — — — — - — — — — — - - - — - — — } ZONE AE (EL 11) VE s I 3RD ST ZONE VE (EL 13) ZONEfiVE It r I TTf ST — f._ J6 _ A_ r ZO► E VE' ` - _ ` (EL 13) 1 i ZONE AE O ? E�— (3102 (EL 11) ZONE E ZO I S PA 0104 _ iEL 1 AE 7 ��� ZONE :AE _ ZONE VE (EL 12) a�� (EL 11) ' = - CLE. (EL 17) ZONE VE E t e� • (EL 16) r • \ \• +PARKWAY ZONE VE �` \• \ (EL 14) 1 "VE ,- G I S Data This drawing is comprised of data obtained from a variety of sources It is for information purposes only and is not to be considered comprehensive for site - specific data. N A ROOM KNON CM UITTAAM; •K BASINz B 0.10 B 0.12 C 0.10 D � I E 0 TOTAL 1.87 DISCHARGE TO OIL AND GREASE SEPARATOR. BASIN "E ", IN FRONT OF A BUILDING, CONTINUES SHEET FLOW TO R /W, HOWEVER, BASIN E IS 5E 116.2.70 r ,Pr � Lt 15 1 BASIN AREA (ACRES) A 0.10 B 0.12 C 0.10 D 1.45 E 0.10 TOTAL 1.87 I R�µr4.45' 4•�1P Ny;o5.6S.6,� y�.5 4S,• g"ayp .yy52. SO M • 04 ,r rs rr 6 *fr ¢ x.02 > -yam. ,5 "per BASIN C � S�y65. 15'PVC BASIN RI E LINE., ,� 1 N • y� ed r 0 30 60 120 "069M iiiij ° NOTE: WATER QUALITY TREATMENT VOLUME BASED ON TREATING THE FIRST 3/4" OF RUNOFF OVER 1.87 ACRES. BASINS "A" AND "B" YARD DRAINS o OUTSIDE OF BUILDING DISCHARGE TO OCS 101. BASIN C r YARD DRAINS DISCHARGE TO OIL AND GREASE SEPARATOR. BASIN "E ", IN FRONT OF BUILDING, CONTINUES SHEET FLOW TO R /W, HOWEVER, BASIN E IS INCLUDED IN THE AREA BEING TREATED. c DESCRIPTION. CLEARWATER BEACH VACATION OWNERSHIP PROJECT PROJECT No. EPN: DRAINAGE MAP - PROPOSED CONDITIONS 699 -271 209 DATE: FIGURE: N FLORIDA DESIGN CONSULTANTS, INC 1 0/24/07 ENGINEERS, ENVIRONMENTALISTS, SURVEYORS 8 PLANNERS 3030 Starkey Blvd, New Port Richey FL 34655 DRAWN BY: Tel: (727) 849 -7588 - Fax: (727) 848 -3648 JMS ©Copyright 2007 Florida Design Consultants, Inc. Drawings and concepts may not be used or reproduced without written permission. 0 I #: 2007401796 BK: 16097 PG: 1397, 12/21/2007 at 04:54 PM, RECORDING 3 PAGES $27.00 D DOC STAMP COLLECTION $122500.00 KEN BURKE, CLERK OF COURT PINELLAS COUNTY, FL BY DEPUTY CLERK: CLKDMC9 This Instrument Was Prepared -, -' By And Should Be Retu64 To: Stephen L. Kussner GrayRobinson, P.S. 201 N. Franklin Street... Suite 2200 Tampa, Florida 33602 Phone: (813) 273 =5000 Property Appraises Parcel Identlfication (Folio) Number: 07/29/15523$.0 /800/0330 SPECIAL WARRANTY DEED THIS SPECIAL, WARRANTY DEED, executed as of the 21st day of December, 2007, by ` INDIGO BEACH, L.L.C., a Florida limited liability company formerly known as TWIBEACH Residences — Clearwater, L.L.C., a Florida limited liability company (the "Grantor "), whose mailing address is 877 Executive Center Drive West, Suite 205, St. Petersburg, Florida 33702 -2472 to SALT BLOCK 57, L.L.C., a Utah limited liability company, whose mailing address is 1000 Market Street, Building One, Suite 300, Portsmouth, New Hampshire 03801 (the "Grantee'), WITNESSETH: That Grantor, for and in consideration of the sum of $10.00 and other good and valuable consideration to Grantor in hand paid by Grantee, the receipt and sufficiency of which is acknowledged, has granted, bargained, and sold to Grantee and Grantee's successors and assigns forever, the following described real property situate, lying, and being in Pinellas County, Florida, (the "Pro a and described on Exhibit "A" attached hereto. Together with all easements, tenements, hereditaments, and appurtenances belonging or in anyways appertaining to the Property, and the reversion and reversions, remainder and remainders, rents, issues, and profits of the Property, and all the estate, right, title, interest, claims, and demands whatsoever of the Grantor, either in law or equity, of, in, and to the Property, with the hereditaments and appurtenances to the Property. This conveyance is subject to: all easements, conditions, restrictions, covenants, limitations, reservations and matters of record, provided, however, that this reference shall not operate to reimpose any of same; all taxes and assessments for the year 2008 and subsequent years; all laws, ordinances, governmental regulations and resolutions, including, but not limited to, all applicable building, zoning, land use and environmental ordinances and regulations; and matters which would be disclosed by an accurate survey. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the same in fee simple forever. And Grantor covenants with Grantee that, except as above noted and as limited by the next sentence, at the time of the delivery of this special warranty deed, Grantor hereby specially warrants the title to the Property and will defend it against the lawful claims of all persons claiming by, through, or under Grantor, but not otherwise. W9003%70 - 0 1194376 A �^ w ® , c�4 CD . PINELLAS COUNTY FL OFF. REC. BK 16097 PG 1398 IN WITNESS WHEREOF,.' Grantor has executed this Special Warranty Deed as of the day and year first above wnUen.`, WPTNESSES: INDIGO BEACH, L.L.C., a Florida limited liability company By: Robert E. Glantz, Vice President [SEAL) STATE OF FLORIDA co OF/VA7'�E 'The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of December, '.." 2007; by Robert E. Glantz as Vice President of INDIGO BEACH, L.L. , a Florida limited liability company, on behalf of the limited liability company. He is �personall known to me or has produced as id fication. OTARY PUBL _ r /� ........ EMiNiNE E •...... .. .... � Name: t�'�i? n/A h N � C� . f fC 0e.1 f A'- CornrnrKDDOde3916 a Serial No. . E SM012011 My Commission expires: € ar Rana. Na" Aimm, ru = A.... 1..... N..M ..............MM........... \490039 \70 - # 1194376 v3 .W �,pnn Cyr�9. . 4 L \490039 \70 - # 1194376 v3 • PINELLAS COUNTY FL OFF. REC. BK 16097 PG 1399 EJ%JMIT "A" LEGAL DESCRHMON A tract of land consisting. of Lots 33, 34 and 35 and part of Lot 36, of LLOYD- WHITE- SKINNER SUBDIVISION, according to map or plat thereof recorded in Plat 13, pages 12 and 13, of the Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida, and lands and submerged lands lying between and Southerly Southwesterly or Westerly of the mean high water mark and the Bulkhead Line described in and set forth in Trustees of the Internal Improvement Fund of the State of Florida Disclaimer No. 22310, as recorded in Official Records Book 765, Page 542, of the Public Reeords�of Pinellas County, Florida, said tract being described as follows: From the Northern Most: eomer of said Lot 33, run South 77° 41'16" West, along the Northwesterly boundary of siid' Lot 33 and the Southwesterly extension thereof, a distance of 400.00 feet to a point oil the Bulkhead Line described above; run thence Southeasterly along said Bulkhead Line along." a eurvc to the left (radius - 1247.00 feet), an arc distance of 296.79 feet, (chord bearing - South: 1:9' 07'51" East); run thence North 68° 55'27" East, a distance of 402.14 feet to a point on the_ Northeasterly boundary of said Lot 36; run thence Northwesterly along the Northeasterly boardiAes of said Lots 36, 35, 34 and 33, which line is a curve to the right (radius - 847.00 feet), an arc distance of 235.76 feet (chord - 235.00 feet, chord bearing - North 20" 17'10" West) to the Point of Beginning. BEING THE SAME PROPERTY AS: A tract of land consisting of Lots 33, 34 and 35, and part of Lot 36, of LLOYD- WHITE- SKINNER SUBDIVISION, according to the map or plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book 13, Pages 12 and 13, of the Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida, and lands and submerged lands lying between and Southerly, Southwesterly or Westerly of the mean high water mark and the Bulkhead Line described in and set forth in Trustees of the Internal Improvement Fund of the State of Florida Disclaimer No. 22310, as recorded in Official Records Book 765, Page 542, of the Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida, said tract being described a follows: Begin at an iron pin at the Northeast corner of said Lot 33 and the West right -of -way margin of Gulf View Boulevard, said point being the True Point of Beginning; said point being the PC of a curve to the left, having a radius of 847.00 feet, and an arc distance of 235.76 feet; thence run along said curve to the left, and along the West right -of -way margin of Gulf View Boulevard, a chord bearing of South 20° 17'10" East, and a chord distance of 235.00 feet to an iron pin; thence run South 68° 55'27" West, for a distance of 402.14 feet to an iron pin, said point being the PC of a curve to the right, having a radius of 1,247.00 feet, and an arc distance of 296.79 feet; thence-run along said curve to the right, a chord bearing of North 19° 07'51" West, and a chord distance of 296.09 feet to an iron pin; thence run North 77° 41'16" East, for a distance of 400.00 feet to a point and back to the True Point of Beginning. A9003%70-# 11943760 LU LU < ® Ird �W_ 54pL "� 11/2/2007 Cz Receipt #: 1200700000000009867 11:33:17AM Date: 11/02/2007 r Line Items: Case No Tran Code Description Revenue Account No Amount Paid FLD2007 -11034 04 Flexible Commercial 010 - 341262 1,205.00 FLD2007 -11034 Fire - Prelim Site Plan 010- 342501 200.00 Line Item Total: $1,405.00 Payments: Method Payer Initials Check No Confirm No How Received Amount Paid Check INDIGO BEACH LLC R_D 01210 In Person 1,405.00 Payment Total: $1,405.00 THIS IS NOT A PERMIT. This is a receipt for an application for a permit. This application will be reviewed and you will be notified as to the outcome of the application. cReceipt.rpt Page 1 of 1 0 0 WLJ FLD2007 -11034 430 S GULFVIEW BLVD CLEARWATER BEACH VACATI ATLAS # UNK ZONING: T LAND USE: RFH RECEIVED: 11/02/2007 INCOMPLETE: COMPLETE: MAPS: PHOTOS: STAFF REPORT: DRC: CDB: CLWCoverSheet A i C QTY OF C LEARWATER POST OFFICE BOX 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758 -4748 g MUNICIPAL: SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CI.EARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562 -4567 FAx (727) 562 -4865 PLANNING DEPARTMENT January 16, 2008 Mr. E. D. Armstrong III, Esquire Johnson, Pope, Bokor, Ruppel & Burns, LLP P.O. Box 1368 Clearwater, Florida 33757 -1368 RE:. Development Order - Cases FLD2007- 11034/TDR2005- 05022 430 South Gulfview Boulevard Dear Mr. Armstrong: This letter constitutes a Development Order pursuant to Section 4- 206.D.6 of the Community Development Code. On January 15, 2008, the Community Development Board reviewed your request for (1) Termination of Status of Nonconformity for density (217 overnight accommodation units; where 93 overnight accommodation units are permitted today), under the provisions of Section 6 -109; (2) Flexible Development approval to permit 230 overnight accommodation units in the Tourist (T) District with reductions to the front (east) setback from 15 feet to zero feet (to trash staging area), reductions to the side (north) setback from the Coastal Construction Control Line (CCCL) from 10 feet to six feet (to building) and to zero feet (to sidewalk), reductions to the side (south) setback from 10 feet to three feet (to sidewalk) and to zero feet (to trash staging area), reductions to the rear (west) setback from the CCCL from 20 feet to eight feet (to building) and to zero feet (to sidewalk), an increase to building height from 35 feet to 100 feet (to roof deck) and to 150 feet (to roof deck) for two portions of the building, a deviation to allow direct access to an arterial street and to allow a two -year time frame to submit for a building permit, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2- 803.C; and (3) including the Transfer of Development Rights of eight total dwelling units (being converted to 13 overnight accommodation units) previously approved and transferred under TDR2005- 05022, including four dwelling units from 557 and 579 Cyprus Avenue, one dwelling unit from 625 -627 Bay Esplanade and three dwelling units from 667 Bay Esplanade, under the provisions of Section 4 -1402. The Community Development Board (CDB) APPROVED the application with the following Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and Conditions of Approval: Findings of Fact: 1. The 2.45 total acres (1.87 acres zoned Tourist District; 0.58 acres zoned Open Space /Recreation District) is located on the west side of South Gulfview Boulevard approximately 500 feet northwest of Hamden Drive and directly south of Clearwater Beach; 2. On April 19, 2005, the Community Development Board (CDB) approved with 10 conditions Case Nos. FLD2005- 01005 /SGN2005 -01016 for the (1) Termination of Status of Nonconformity for density to allow the continuation of an existing 217 - room/unit hotel (where 74 rooms /units were "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER" January 16, 2008 Armstrong — Page 2 permitted at that time) and for height to allow the existing 155 -foot high building (where a maximum height of 150 feet is permitted today); (2) Flexible Development approval to permit a 217 - room/unit overnight accommodation use with reductions to setbacks, an increase to building height from 35 feet to 155 feet (to existing roof deck) and a reduction to required parking from 217 to 201 spaces (existing) as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project; (3) Reduction to the required interior landscape area, as a Comprehensive Landscape Program; and (4) Comprehensive Sign Program approval (SGN2005- 01016); 3. On August 16, 2005, the CDB approved with 18 conditions Case Nos. FLD2005-05047/TDR2005- 05022 for the (1) Termination of Status of Nonconformity for density (217 overnight accommodation units existing to be converted to 104 dwelling units; where 56 dwelling units wee permitted at that time); (2) Flexible Development approval to permit a mixed use of 112 attached dwelling units and 78 overnight accommodation rooms /units with reductions to setbacks, increases to building height from 35 feet 100 feet for the overnight accommodation building tower and from 35 feet to 150 feet for the residential tower (to roof deck), a reduction to driveway spacing from 125 feet to 90 feet and a deviation to allow direct access to a arterial street, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project; and (3) Transfer of Development Rights (TDR2005- 05022) of four dwelling units from 557 and 579 Cyprus Avenue,. one dwelling unit from 625 -627 Bay Esplanade and three dwelling units from 667 Bay Esplanade; 4. The nonconforming status of the prior hotel density has been determined to still be valid, even though the hotel was demolished, due to the status of the approval of Case Nos. FLD2005- 05047/TDR2005 -05022 and the time extensions granted; 5. The proposal is to construct a new building on the property with a vacation/interval ownership project consisting of 230 overnight accommodation units; 6. The development proposal includes a request for Termination of Status of Nonconformity for density (217 overnight accommodation units; where 93 overnight accommodation units are permitted today); 7. Eight dwelling units were previously transferred to this site under TDR2005 -05022 and are being converted to 13 overnight accommodation units for this project; 8. The proposal includes three floors of parking for a total of 409 parking spaces at a ratio of 1.76 spaces per unit (where one space per unit is required); 9. The proposal includes a deviation to allow direct access to an arterial street, where the site has no other means of street access except to South Gulfview Boulevard; 10. With Beach Walk construction, Coronado Drive will function as the main arterial street between the roundabout and Hamden Drive, south of the subject property and this change of street designation will be included in the upcoming Comprehensive Plan update; 11. The proposal includes reductions to the front (east) setback from 15 feet to zero feet (to trash staging area), reductions to the side (north) setback from the Coastal Construction Control Line (CCCL) from 10 feet to six feet (to building) and to zero feet (to sidewalk), reductions to the side (south) setback from 10 feet to three feet (to sidewalk) and to zero feet (to trash staging area) and reductions to the rear (west) setback from the CCCL from 20 feet to eight feet (to building) and to zero feet (to sidewalk); 12. The proposal includes an increase to building height from 35 feet to 100 feet (to roof deck) and to 150 feet (to roof deck) for two portions of the building; 13. The higher portion of the building is separated from the 440 West condominium tower to the south by approximately 158 feet, which is in compliance with the Beach by Design requirement to have a minimum spacing of 100 feet between towers exceeding 100 feet in height; 14. The proposal includes a request for deviations to Beach by Design guidelines which require the floorplate of any building exceeding 45 feet in height be limited to a maximum of 25,000 square feet January 16, 2008 Armstrong — Page 3 • between 45 - 100 feet and a maximum of 10,000 square feet between 100 — 150 feet, as the largest floorplate between 45 — 100 feet is approximately 43,179 square feet and between 100 — 150 feet is approximately 20,832 square feet, but the guideline allows deviations to these floorplate requirements provided the mass and scale of the design creates a tiered effect and complies with the maximum building envelop allowance above 45 feet; 15. Beach by Design guidelines requires for buildings with a footprint of greater than 5,000 square feet, where the proposal is approximately 60,804 square feet, to be constructed so that no more than two of the three building dimensions in the vertical or horizontal planes are equal in length. The project's overall horizontal plane dimensions are approximately 207.5 feet along South Gulfview Boulevard and 276 feet along the north side, while the vertical plane is approximately 160 feet from grade to the top of the tallest roof. None of these dimensions are equal; 16. Beach by Design guidelines requires no plane or elevation to continue uninterrupted for greater than 100 feet without an offset of more than five feet. The planes of all elevations provide in and out modulation of five — 10 feet, where the largest uninterrupted plane is approximately 29 feet; 17. Beach by Design guidelines requires at least 60 percent of any elevation to be covered with windows or architectural decoration. The applicant has calculated that the north elevation is at 62.6 percent, the east elevation at 70.7 percent, the south elevation at 66.1 percent and the west elevation at 68.8 percent; and 18. There are no outstanding Code Enforcement issues associated with the subject property. Conclusions of Law: 1. That the development proposal is consistent with the Standards as per Tables 2 -801.1 and 2 -803 of the Community Development Code; 2. That the development proposal is consistent with the Flexibility criteria as per Section 2 -803.0 of the Community Development Code; 3. That the development proposal is consistent with the General Standards for Level Two Approvals as per Section 3 -913 of the Community Development Code; and 4. That the development proposal is consistent with the Design Guidelines of Beach by Design. Conditions of Approval: 1. That application for a building permit to construct the approved project be submitted no later than January 15, 2010, unless time extensions are granted pursuant to Section 4 -407; 2. That the final design and color of the overnight accommodation building be consistent with the conceptual elevations submitted to, or as modified by, the CDB; 3. That the use of this property be for overnight accommodations, meeting the definition of the Community Development Code, with owner and guest stays not to exceed 30 days (whether occupancy of units arise from a rental agreement, other agreement or the payment of consideration). This development shall not be deemed attached dwellings with individual dwelling units, nor shall units qualify for homestead exemption or home or business occupational licenses; 4. That a Declaration of Unity of Title (for condominiums) be recorded in the public records prior to the issuance of any permits; 5. That a condominium or other form of plat be recorded prior to the issuance of the building permit or first Certificate of Occupancy, depending on the form of the sale of the units, as necessary or required; 6. That there be no public /guest use of either roof, 7. That, prior to the issuance of any permits, waterfront visibility triangles be correctly indicated on the civil site and landscape plans; C: f January 16, 2008 Armstrong — Page 4 • 8. That any future freestanding sign be a monument -style sign and be designed to match the exterior materials and color of the building. The maximum height shall be four feet, unless approved at six feet high through a Comprehensive Sign Program; 9. That sea - turtle friendly light fixtures be employed with the site design, with. compliance demonstrated on plans acceptable to the Environmental Engineering Division, prior to the issuance of building permits; 10. That, prior to the issuance of any permits, the civil plans be amended to indicate the following: a. curbing of the edges of pavement for the trash staging /loading area; b. detailed perimeter grading to ensure proposed site grading of swales and yard grate inlets works with the proposed landscaping; and C. a stoop outside the double doors from the south side of the building adjacent to the trash holding room; 11. That, prior to the issuance of any permits, the civil and architectural plans be coordinated as to the location of mirrors and signage to aid motorists backing out of visually blocked parking spaces on all levels of the parking garage; 12. That, prior to the issuance of any permit, compliance with all requirements of General Engineering and Stormwater Engineering be met; 13. That all Fire Department requirements be met prior to the issuance of any permits; 14. That any applicable Public Art and Design Impact Fee be paid prior to the issuance of any permits; and 15. That all Parks and Recreation fees be paid prior to the issuance of any permits. Pursuant to Section 4 -407, an application for a building permit or other approvals shall be made within the time frame of Condition #1 above. All required certificates of occupancy shall be obtained within two years of the date of issuance of the building permit. Time frames do not change with successive owners. The Community Development Coordinator may grant an extension of time for a period not to exceed one year and only within the original period of validity. The Community Development Board may, approve one additional extension of time after the community development coordinator's extension to initiate a building permit application. The issuance of this Development Order does not relieve you of the necessity to obtain any building permits or pay any impact fees that may be required. In order to facilitate the issuance of any permit or license affected by this approval, please bring a copy of this letter with you when applying for any permits or licenses that require this prior development approval. Additionally, an appeal of a Level Two approval (Flexible Development) may be initiated pursuant to Section 4 -502.13 by the applicant or by any person granted party status within 14 days of the date of the CDB meeting. The filing of an application/notice of appeal shall stay the effect of the decision pending the final determination of the case. The appeal period for your case expires on January 28, 2008 (14 days from the date of the CDB meeting). If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call Wayne M. Wells, Planner III, at 727 -562 -4504. You can access zoning information for parcels within the City through our website: vvww.myclearwater.coi-n/gov/depts/-plannin • 6 January 16, 2008 Armstrong — Page 5 �{ Sincerely, - Planning Director • S: (Planning Department I C D B (FLEX (FLD) Ilnacti ve or Finished Applications I Gulfview S 0430 CB Vacation (T) 1.2008 - Approved I Gulfview S 430 Development Order 1.16.08.doc Message � � Page 1 of 1 Wells, Wayne From: Jayne E. Sears [JayneS @jpfirm.com] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2008 5:09 PM To: Wells, Wayne Cc: Katie Cole; Ed Armstrong Subject: 430 S. Gulfview Conditions of approval are acceptable to the applicant, as we discussed. If the 440 West residents show up on Monday, please let me know. 'I also informed our client. Jayne E. Sears Legal Assistant Johnson, Pope, Bokor, Ruppel & Burns, LLP 911 Chestnut Street Clearwater, FL 33756 Phone: (727) 461 -1818 Fax: (727) 462 -0365 1/13/2008 • Wells, Wayne • From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2008 3:12 PM To: Jayne Sears (E -mail) Subject: FLD2007- 11034/TDR2005- 05022, 430 S. Gulfview Blvd. Jayne - Attached is the Staff Report for the above referenced application, to be heard by the CDB on January 15, 2008. To -date I have not received any letters or emails in opposition. Please review the Conditions of Approval in the Staff Report and let me know if they are acceptable. If acceptable, then at this time this application will be shown on the Consent portion of the CDB agenda. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me. Wayne Gulfview S 430 Staff Report.do.. 0 Wells, Wayne From: Katie Cole [Katiec @jpfirm.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2008 10:13 AM To: Wells, Wayne; Jayne E. Sears Cc: Ed Armstrong Subject: RE: 430 S. Gulfview Blvd. • Not technically. It depends on how the operator chooses to market /sell the units. If the nature of the sales of units requires a plat, then of course, we will come back to the city for approval per section 4 -701. (separate parcels are not necessary for taxation as f.s. 192.037 states that the units are taxed collectively). - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Wayne.Wells @myClearwater.com [ mailto :Wayne.wells @myClearwater.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2008 8:03 AM To: Jayne E. Sears; Katie Cole Subject: 430 S. Gulfview Blvd. Jayne /Katie - Am working on the staff report. When these interval ownership units are sold, is it pursuant to a condominium plat or some other type of plat? I have normal conditions of approval for regular plats for subdivisions and for condominiums, but I don't know if this falls into either. Please let me know this morning if possible. Wayne V SUPPLEMENTAL RESPONSES TO PLANNING COMMENTS FLD2007 -11034 430 S. GULFVIEW BOULEVARD JAIL 0 7 2008 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLW.,4b`A ER PLANNING: JComment No. 1a: r 12/21/07 — WW - Sheet 3/13 and architectural sheets — On the north and west sides, the setbacks need to be indicated from the Coastal Construction Control Line (CCCL). Response No. 1a: See revised plans and Site Data Table (Civil Plans, Sheet 1). The setback lines have been revised on the drawings to reflect an 8' -0" setback measured from the CCCL on the west side of the property and a 6 " -0" setback from the CCCL on the north side of the property. J Comment No. 1b: 11128/07 — WW - Sheet 3/13 — Show on the site plan the location and setback from the property lines of the exterior of the building structure for the timeshare floors, the balconies and the eaves. Setbacks apply to all structures, whether at grade or in the air. Reality is that the setbacks indicated are inaccurate. Show actual setbacks. Balconies and eaves can only encroach into required setbacks in accordance with the provisions of Section 3 -908. JResponse. No. 1 b: The Architectural plans have been revised to show the property boundaries and the CCCL on all plan sheets, including measurements of the setbacks, for the ease of the reviewer. In some instances, balconies, canopies, eaves and other projections encroach into the permitted or requested setbacks in accordance with the provisions of Section 3 -908 and have been noted as such. Comment No. 2a. 12/20/07 — WW - Waterfront visibility triangles drawn incorrectly (wrong dimensions). Look at Section 3 -904.13 again for the dimensions and angle to use. Condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: That the fence construction beyond the CCCL will require approval from the State DEP prior to the issuance of the building permit. Response No. 2a: See revised plans. Civil Plans Sheet 3. All proposed construction seaward of the CCCL is subject to FDEP permitting. Comment No. 2b: 11/28/07 — WW - Sheet L -1 — Section 3- 804.C.1 and Section 3 -904.13 only permits a maximum of a three -foot high non - opaque fence within the required setback for waterfront property (which this is) and within waterfront visibility ORIGINAL RE ulD triangles. Revise proposed 4 — 6 foot high fences to a AN 07 2000 maximum three feet height along the west top of seawall and the southwest and northwest corners of the property. PIPm*', ,HGDF,Pasn, r. Fence along seawall -is also seaward of the CCCL and will CITY Or CL0:.V;' require State Approval. Response No. 2b: The fence location has been revised to comply with waterfront visibility triangles. We understand the proposed fence requires DEP approval prior to construction and will apply for such permit prior to building permit. J Comment No. 3a: 12/23/07 — WW - Sheet 1/13 - Land Use Data — Based on other Planning comments, revise all proposed setbacks. Those indicated on this sheet are inaccurate or are not specific as to what the proposed setback is for. Reminder — Per Section 3- 905.A, required setbacks to be measured to all structures from the CCCL. Response No. 3a: See revised Civil Plans, sheet 1 and all architectural plans. 1 Comment No. 3b: 12/4/07 — WW - Sheet 1/13 — Land Use Data — Based on other Planning comments, revise all proposed setbacks. Those indicated on this sheet are inaccurate or are not specific as to what the proposed setback is for. Reminder — Per Section 3- 905.A, required setbacks to be measured to all structures from the CCCL. Response No. 3b: The architectural plans have been revised to show the property boundaries and the CCCL on all plan sheets, including dimensions to setbacks, for the ease of the reviewer. In some instances, balconies, canopies, eaves and other projections encroach into the permitted or requested setbacks in accordance with the provisions of Section 3 -908 and have been noted as such. omment No. 4a: 12/23/07 — WW - On all appropriate sheets, show mirrors or other devices to aid the motorist when backing out blind. Signs in front of the spaces telling the motorist to use the mirrors are also required: Parking Level 1 — Spaces 13, 14, 61 and 61; Parking Level 2 — Spaces 16, 17, 66, 67, 68 and 69; Parking Level 3 — Spaces 52, 53, 54, 55, 71 and 72. Response No. 4a: Mirrors have been added to the drawings as requested. See revised plans sheets 3, 4 & 5, and A2.101, 102, & 103. Parking spaces requiring mirrors have been noted on architectural plans to include required notification signage. 2 • V Comment No. 4b: 12/4/07 — WW - Sheets 3/13, 4/13, 5115, A2.101, A2.102 and A2.103 — On Parking Levels 1, 2 and 3, there are many parking spaces adjacent to solid walls for rooms, stairwells, etc., that block the view of motorists when backing out 71 (backing out blind into the drive aisle). Need to provide mirrors or other devices at all of these spaces to aid pLANij &IG,D &&,tMENT motorists. Show on plans the locations of such mirrors or CITyOrCLU�WATER other devices. Response No. 4b: Mirrors will be installed as necessary. See Civil Sheets 3 to 5, Architectural plans A2.101, 102, & 103. Comment No. 5a: 12/20/07 — WW - Show curbing on Sheets 3/13 and 7/13 (see L -1). Response No. 5a: See revised civil plans sheets 3 and 7; landscape plans sheet L- 1. icomment No. 5b: 12/4/07 — WW - Sheet 3/13 — Note #2 at bottom of page — Rather than header curb, do you mean straight curb, as shown in the detail on Sheet 11/13? Show curbing on both sides of all three driveways on Sheets 3/13, 7/13 and L -1. Response No. 5b: See revised Sheets 3/13, 7/13 and L -1. Comment No. 6a: 12/20/07 — WW - Sheet 3/13 — Revise service room and add trash room as shown on Sheet A2.101. Response No. 6a: See revised Civil sheet 3. J Comment No. 6b: 12/4/07 — WW - Sheets 3/13 and A2.101 — There should be at least one door into the service room within the lobby area. Response No. 6b: See revised plans showing door. J Comment No. 7a: 12/20/07 — WW - Sheets 3 & 4/13 — Revise columns per Sheets A2.101 and A2.102. Response No. 7a: Civil plans revised to match architect's plans. See revised plans Sheets 3 & 4. Comment No. 7b: 12/4/07 — WW - Sheets 3/13, A2.101, A2.102 and A2.103 — Two columns on southern most end of parking rows south of ramp (northeast of southwestern stairwell) encroach into the required 24 -foot wide north /south drive aisle. Revise. Response No. 7b: Plans have been revised. 3 Comment No. 8a. 12/20/07 — WW - Sheet 7/13 — Provide existing and proposed grade elevations throughout the site now, so that one can see how the landscaping is working with site drainage. Response No. 8a: Existing grades are in the 5 -6 range. Finished floor elevation for ` ":.JN& Level 1 is 6 +. Construction plans will ensure drainage is AC collected via yard drain system and routed to on -site treatment area, as noted on Sheet 7. Detailed perimeter grading will be " shown on construction plans. JCa6WT rRW'6J : 12/4/07 — WW - Sheet 7/13 — Provide existing and proposed grade elevations throughout the site now, so that one can see how the landscaping is working with site drainage. Response No. 8b: To be shown on construction plans. J Comment No. 9a: 12/21/07 — WW - Sheets A2.105 thru A2.114 — Levels 5 -16 — Dimensions on the north side as to setbacks are inaccurate. Setback distances must be measured from the CCCL. Response No. 9a: See revised plans and Site Data Table (Civil Plans, Sheet 1). The setback lines have been revised on the drawings to reflect an 8' -0" setback measured from the CCCL on the west side of the property and a 6 " -0" setback from the CCCL on the north side of the property. J Comment No. 9b: 12/4/07 — WW - Sheets A2.105 thru A2.114 — Levels 5 -16 — Dimension the distance the walls of the units project out from the columns, as well as balconies. This relates to setbacks and how close the building actually is to property lines, which is inaccurately indicated on the site plan. Response No. 9b: Property line and CCCL lines are now indicated on these levels with setback dimension indicated. J Comment No. 10a: 12/21/07 — WW — Elevations do not indicate the intended color scheme (no color legend). Response No. 10a: See revised Sheets A5.101 through A5.104. A color key legend has been added to the elevations. There are small scaled color elevations in the set and there is a Building Materials/Textures /Color listing with color chips attached in the package. Comment No. 10b: 12/4/07 — WW — Provide all four building elevations that are not colored, that do not have landscaping that hides the building features and does not have any sun shade lines 0 • 0 LL,1 W and shading. On the elevations indicate the exterior building material and color. May use a legend indicating �,. ;� _, such material and color, with numbers on the building ® (D U corresponding to the legend. You may still include the ® Q9 O colored elevations with your submittal package, but there is �; too much "extra" stuff on the elevations that hides U information and makes reviewing the elevations difficult to read. Response No. 10b: Revised elevations included. f Comment No. 11a: 12/21/07 — WW — Response as to the 8 -inch differential is unclear. Maximum height is 16' -0 ", not 16' -8 ". Response No. 11a: The city definition for "Height, building or structure" states: (3) Elevator equipment rooms and like mechanical equipment enclosures shall be permitted to project up to 16 feet higher than the maximum height specified for the zoning district in which the building is located." The beginning point for the dimension line on the lower tower portion is 8" below the maximum height allowed, therefore the maximum allowable height above the roof deck is 16-8 ", as confirmed with WW by architect. J Comment No. 11 b: 12/5/07 — WW — Definition of building height limits projections above the top of the flat roof to 16 feet for elevators, stairs and mechanical equipment rooms. North Elevation' indicates this maximum height limitation, but it appears that gable roofed projections (have no idea what they are for) are higher than ,16 feet. South Elevation actually dimensioned such as 16' -8" on the lower portion of the building. Revise. Response No. 11 b: The beginning point for the dimension line is 8" below the maximum height on the lower tower portion of the building. The roof projections, all which house equipment, will not exceed 116' per the definition for Height, Building or structure in Beach by Design which states: "(3) Elevator equipment rooms and like mechanical equipment enclosures shall be permitted to project up to 16 feet higher than the maximum height specified for the I zoning district in which the building is located." J Comment No. 12a: 12/21/07 — WW — Not all roof eaves and architectural decoration, such as shade structures, indicated on the elevations show up on the floor plans with dimensions from the building AND the setback from the property line. Response No. 12a: See revised Sheets A2.101 through A2.106, A2.110 through A2.114 and A2.117. l•" Comment No. 12b: 12/5/07 — WW — Floor plans and building elevations — Provide dimensions indicating the distance balconies and roof eaves project from the face of the building. Response No. 12b: See response to Planning Comment 1 on Page 9 of this response document. J Comment No. 13a: 12/21/07 — WW — Elevation still shows fluctuation, yet the floor plan still shows a basically flat fagade. Still unclear. Response No. 13a: See revised plans. JComment No. 13b: 12/5/07 — WW — North and South Elevations — Fagade at the amenity Level 4 is indicated as basically flat on the floor plan Sheet A2.104, yet the elevation appears to indicate similar fluctuation of the facade as floors above. Correlate Sheet A2.104 and the building elevations. Response No. 13b: See revised plans. Comment No. 14a 12/23/07 — WW — Transfer of Development Rights — Submitted warranty deeds will be forwarded to Leslie Dougall -Sides to determine if properly written and recorded. If there are issues, will contact you with the issues and how to correct. Response No. 14a: . We will reply to comments when received. J Comment No. 14b: 12/5/07 — WW — Transfer of Development Rights — Submitted warranty deeds will be forwarded to Leslie Dougall -Sides to determine if properly written and recorded. If there are issues, will contact you with the issues and how to correct. Response No. 14b: We will reply to comments when received. iComment No. 15a: 12/21/07 — WW — Exhibit B — Request "a" — Revise FLD- 01005 to FLD2005- 01005. Response No. 15a: See Revised Exhibit "B" to application. J Comment No. 15b: 12/5/07 — WW — Exhibit B — Request "a" — Revise FLD -01005 to FLD2005- 01005. Response No. 15b: See Revised Exhibit "B" to application. ORIGINAL RECD JAN 0 7 2008 6 PLANNING D£�! TMENT CITY OF CLE `NATER Comment No. 16a: 12/21/07 — WW — Response to General Applicability criteria #5 — Revise in the second paragraph, last line, "10' -wide shell sidewalk" to "10' -wide shell finish concrete sidewalk ". Response No. 16a: See Revised Exhibit "B" to application. J Comment No. 16b: 12/5/07 — WW — Response to General Applicability criteria #5 — Revise in the second paragraph, last line, "10' -wide shell sidewalk" to "10' -wide shell finish concrete sidewalk ". Response No. 16b: Noted. See revised Exhibit "B" to application. JComment No. 17: Sheets 4 & 5 of 13 — Since these floors are not at ground level, remove the doors to the exterior of the building and add doors from the parking garage into the stairwells on the north and south sides of the building. Response No. 17: See revised plans Sheets 3, 4 & 5. JComment No. 18: Sheets 3,4 & 5 of 13 — Show the elevator and lobby next to the west side of the northwesternmost stairwell. Response No. 18: See revised plans Sheets 3, 4, & 5. Comment No. 19: Sheets 3 /13, L -1, L -2, IR -1 & A2.101 — There are double doors to the exterior shown west of the trash holding room that lead out to landscaping. Unclear as to the purpose of these doors. Suggest removal Response No. 19: These doors provide direct access to the service area without going through the trash room. There is no landscaping shown on plans. JComment No. 20: Sheet 3/13 — Western wall enclosing the service drive is drawn too far east from that shown on Sheets L -1, L -2, IR -1 and As -101. Revise location. Alternately, if Sheet 3/13 is the correct location for this wall, then revise Sheets L -1, L- 2, IR -1 and A2.101. Response No. 20: See revised plans Sheet 3. JComment No. 21: Sheet 4/13 — Relocate the words "Fire Command Room" to the appropriate location (see A2.102). Response No. 21: The Fire Command room has been properly identified on Sheet 4. ORIGINAL REd ENED AN 0 7 2000 7 PLANNWG DEPARTMENT CITY Of CL ;: WATER JComment No. 22 Response No. 22: Cm Response No. 23: o No. 24: Response No. JComment No 24 • 0 Sheet 3/13 — Show the wall on the east side to screen the three parking spaces south of the lobby facing the valet drop -off area (see Sheet A2.101). See revised plans Sheet 3. Condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: That there be no public /guest use of either roof; Acknowledged. Condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: That application for building permits be submitted no later than January 15, 2010, unless time extensions are granted pursuant to Code Provisions. Acknowledged. 25: Prior comments dealt with needing to meet the required 15- foot front setback (previously a 14.75 -foot dimension was indicated). Plans revised to show structure meeting the 15- foot front setback. However, on Sheets A2.112, A2.113 and A2.114 a dimension of 14' -10" is now introduced as apparently the front setback to the building. No request to reduce the front setback below 15 feet for the building has been submitted nor is it being advertised. Revise. Response No. 25: JComment No. 26: Response No. 26: JComment No. 27: See revised plans. Sheet 5/13 — Revise location of door into the stairwell east of bank of four elevators from the east wall to the north wall (see Sheet A2.103). See revised plans Sheet 5. Sheets A2.103 — A2.114 and A2.117 — Floor plans do not show any decorative /functional roof or shade structures that are not floor area or balconies, including the distance these decorative /functional roof or shade structures project from the wall fagade (and setback from the property line or CCCL). This also holds true for the roof plan, which indicates the "roof' to be located 3' -4" to the south property line and 3' -0" to the north property line (must be to the CCCL). These decorative /functional roof or shade structures can be viewed in the elevations, but are not on the floor plans, and are hard to correlate. Code Section 3- 908 sets out the maximum distance these structures can encroach. There are no increases to these allowable 0 M s _6 fit, See revised plans. Sheet 5/13 — Revise location of door into the stairwell east of bank of four elevators from the east wall to the north wall (see Sheet A2.103). See revised plans Sheet 5. Sheets A2.103 — A2.114 and A2.117 — Floor plans do not show any decorative /functional roof or shade structures that are not floor area or balconies, including the distance these decorative /functional roof or shade structures project from the wall fagade (and setback from the property line or CCCL). This also holds true for the roof plan, which indicates the "roof' to be located 3' -4" to the south property line and 3' -0" to the north property line (must be to the CCCL). These decorative /functional roof or shade structures can be viewed in the elevations, but are not on the floor plans, and are hard to correlate. Code Section 3- 908 sets out the maximum distance these structures can encroach. There are no increases to these allowable Response No. 27 JComment No. 28: Response No. 28 Other: 0 0 maximums,'nor any reductions to setbacks allowable. This has been mentioned before this application was submitted and still appears to be an issue. This has been discussed with Michael Delk, who agrees with this comment. Revise all appropriate sheets. See revised plans. Roof elements are dimensioned to the CCCL. Sheet A5.100 — West elevation is really the north elevation. Revise to actual west elevation. See revised plans. No Comments. 1/7/2008 10:57 AM 045934.109561 #424259 v1 - Taylor Woodrow /2007 /Responses to Comments #2 ORIGI RECM N 017 2008 LANN41G IE IMEN1 CITY OF CLEA.:A. "ATER 0 • • EXHIBIT "B" Z UU TO FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION FOR COMPREHENSIVE INFILL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT N Indige Salt Block 57, L.L.C. 430 South Gulfview Boulevard �J W Section B. Description of Request Request The Applicant and property owner, Salt Block 57, L.L.C., feFn;erly known - , v v, vv...v.. ..v v-..- -- ...._. -, _. _. _.., .- -. ....- .J - - - .. - - -- -- - - - - - - - -J -- - - -J - - - years proposes to redevelop the property with 230 overnight accommodation units. The subject property is the former Adam's Mark hotel site, located at 430 South Gulfview Boulevard. The AppliGant nrnnn a to rea n the property with 230 evemight e Specifically, the Applicant seeks flexible development approval of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, in accordance with the plans submitted with this application, including relief as follows: a. Termination of Status of Nonconformity for density 217 overnight accommodation units as established by FLD2005 -01005 and FLD2005- 05047, where 93 rooms (1.87 acres at 50 units /acre) are allowed by the current zoning (Tourist) and land use designation (RFH); b. Transfers of development rights (8 residential dwelling units, being converted to 13 overnight accommodation units) previously transferred to the site from three sender sites pursuant to TDR2005- 05022, including four dwelling units from 557 and 579 Cyprus Avenue, one dwelling unit from 625 -627 Bay Esplanade and three dwelling units from 667 Bay Esplanade, under the provisions of Section 4 -1402; , c. Ari increase of the maximum building height from 35' to 150' (to roof deck) to allow_two proposed towers, one with a height of 150' -0" to roof deck and one with a height of 99' -4" to roof deck; d. Relief from CCCL setback to allow building located 7-6' landward of the CCCL and sidewalk located 0 feet from the CCCL on the north side (where 10' is required) and building located 8' landward of the CCCL and sidewalk located zero feet from the CCCL on the west side (where 20' is required); e. A front (east) setback along Gulfview Boulevard for structures other than buildings of 0' to pavement, where 0' to 15' is required by Code; 0 ca 0 • f. A side (north) setback for structures other than buildings of 0' to sidewalk, where 0'to 10' is required by Code; g. A side (south) setback for structures other than buildings of 3' to sidewalk and 0' to trash holding slab where 0' to 10' is required by Code; h. A rear (west) setback for structures other than buildings of 6' from seawall to sidewalk where 0' to 20' is required by Code; Direct access to an arterial street, South Gulfview Boulevard; and j. Approval of a two -year development order. History The property is the site of the former Adam's Mark Hotel which was built in 1975 and was a landmark at the southerly end of Clearwater Beach for almost 30 years. The hotel closed its doors after sustaining damage from Hurricane Jeanne in September, 2004, and on April 19, 2005, the Community Development Board approved a termination of nonconforming status as to density and granted flexible development approval for height (155'), setbacks, reduced parking and other existing nonconformities in order to allow the hotel to be renovated (FLD2005- 01005). The hotel renovation never occurred and site was purchased on June 3, 2005 by the AppliGapAlndiclo Beach, L: .I.C.. then known as TW /Beach Residences — Clearwater. L.L.C. ( "TW "). On .gust 16, 2005, the owner received approval of termination of non - cI ,pforming status as to density (217 hotel rooms), transfers of development rights and ,flgkible development approval as to increased height and other development parameters in order to allow redevelopment of the site with 112 residential 'cAndominiums and 78 condominium -hotel units (FLD2005- 05047/TDR2005- 05022). Anticipating the approved redevelopment, the owner AppliGaRt demolished the Adam's Mark on October 8, 2005. The City approved several minor revisions and granted extensions to the approved site plan /development order; however, changes in the real estate market and changes in ownership have caused the Applicant to modify the proposed use of the property to provide for overnight accommodations. Proposed Use The Applicant proposes to redevelop the site with a vacation /interval ownership project consisting of 230 overnight accommodation units. Buyers purchase a one - fifty- second fee simple interest in a unit and receive a deed as a tenant -in- common in the unit. Each buyer has the right to use his time in increments as small as a day and as large as a week. The property would include one poolside restaurant and bar. The property's guest services will encourage guests to patronize local eateries and entertainment activities. 2 Section D. Written Submittal Requirements General Applicability Criteria: • 1) The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. West: The property is bounded on the west by the Gulf of Mexico. North: The adjacent property to the north is the public beach and City -owned property, including a public parking lot, which is currently being renovated with Beach Walk improvements. The proposed development incorporates and extends the Beach Walk- improvements into the project, through extension of a 10' -wide shell finish concrete sidewalk, use of decorative pavers and planting of Medjool Date Palms. East: The adjacent property to the east is an area of smaller mixed uses, including hotel, condominium, retail and restaurants. It is anticipated that this area will also be undergoing renovations, as are encouraged by Beach by Design's vision of Beach Walk. The height of the three -story base of the building is compatible with and reflects the scale of the buildings to the east across Gulfview Boulevard as those buildings are generally 4 stories. South: The adjacent property to south is occupied by 440 West condominiums, which are 157' in height and of similar scale than the proposed project. Z The scale, bulk, coverage and density of the proposed project are in keeping with o a, the Design Guidelines set forth in Beach by Design for projects including C approvals of transfers of density and increased building height. Please see the more detailed discussion of these criteria in response to Comprehensive Infill t� Criteria No. 6.b. in this exhibit. 0 �2) The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. The proposed project will enhance this area of the beach in a number of ways, including: (1) Superior architectural design, including a tiered effect along Gulfview Boulevard, and lush landscaping which will visually enhance the neighborhood; (2) Construction which meets current building Codes; (3) Excess parking, adequate stacking space and loading area, in order to eliminate any traffic congestion at the site and eliminate potential off -site parking in public lots. The parking is designed to accommodate staff, 3 • guests, and overnight visitors, as well as provide adequate space for taxis and airport shuttles; (4) Beach Walk improvements incorporated into the site provide for a better pedestrian flow along South Gulfview than what currently exists; (5) Property value will significantly increase; and (6) The transient occupants of the proposed project will be potential clientele of nearby restaurants and other businesses. 3) The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use. The construction of the Beach Walk improvements by the Applicant, including 10'- wide shell finish concrete sidewalks, will improve the pedestrian flow and safety along South Gulfview and the north side of the property. A fence will be constructed along the seawall and northerly and southerly property line for safety purposes. Traffic congestion will be minimized as described in Criteria 4 below. With regard to health, safety and welfare, the proposed development and structure will comply as required with applicable codes including the Florida Building Code, the Life Safety Code and the Florida Fire Prevention Code. Fire Department Access shall comply with NFPA 1 Chapter 18 with Gulf View Boulevard serving as the access road, and more specifically that the access road will extend to within 50' of a single exterior door per 18.2.2.2, an approved route around the exterior of the structure measures not more than 450' from the access road and the building is equipped with sprinklers per 18.2.2.2.3.1 and 18.2.2.3.2. 4) The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. The Applicant has submitted with this application a narrative entitled "Review of Need for a Traffic Study" prepared by Roy E. Chapman, P.E., Florida Design " Consultants, Inc. which concludes that a traffic study should not be required. C= gt .� There are a number of ways in which the project has been designed to minimize rr 0 tr C) 0 traffic congestion on South Gulfview Boulevard: a (1) The entrance to the parking garage will have 150' of stacking space, using the drop -off lane. This will allow adequate room for stacking of vehicles entering or exiting the garage so as not to interfere with traffic flow on South Gulfview. Additionally, vehicles can use the drop -off area in the front to pull off of the street and onto the Property to avoid backups onto Gulfview. (2) . 178 parking spaces in excess of the minimum Code requirement are provided so guests and overnight visitors will not have to wait for spaces or circle the garage looking for a parking space, therefore allowing traffic to flow smoothly into the parking garage off the public street. Due to seasonal congestion on the beach and the lack to date of new public parking facilities, the Applicant desires to insure that all parking demands of the project can be accommodated on site. 4 • • Therefore, the building's design provides for more parking than required by Code to respond to this concern. [408 spaces provided, where 230 spaces (1 space /unit) are required]. (3) Three parking spaces have been designated on the site plan as taxi spaces. There is also a drop -off lane in front of the building. (4) As shown on the proposed site plan, there is a loading /unloading area provided at the southeast corner of the site. This area will be used for trash pick- up and may be used by large delivery vehicles so they will not block traffic on South Gulfview. Generally, due to the use of the Property, smaller - scaled delivery vehicles will use the drop -off area at the front of the Property and parking garage. (5) The garage is designed so the resort can provide valet parking service for some guests. 5) The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. The property is located within and at the northern end of the "Clearwater Pass District" of Clearwater Beach. The project will function as a southerly "bookend" to the "Beach Walk District." The project is also consistent with the community character of the "Clearwater Pass District" which Beach by Design describes as an area of mixed uses including high rise condos and resort hotels. As to the immediate vicinity, to the west is the Gulf of Mexico and the parcel to the north is the public beach and area being renovated by the City of Clearwater with Beach Walk improvements. The Applicant is incorporating the Beach Walk improvements into the property and providing improvements in the City right -of- way to the north of the property as envisioned by Beach by Design, including a 10' -wide shell finish concrete sidewalk and Medjool palms. Z fit Ua U ® The parcel to the south is occupied by 440 West Condominiums; having a height of 157'. This development was built in 1975 and co- existed for 30 years with the o 155' high Adam's Mark hotel. The proposed project is of a superior architectural IM LU design to the Adam's Mark building and incorporates Beach by Design guidelines ZE therefore enhancing the 440 West property. To the east are mixed retail and overnight accommodation uses. This area is also expected to be affected and improved by Beach Walk. Guests of the proposed project may be prospective clientele of the mixed uses to the east. 6) The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts on adjacent properties. 5 • 0 The proposed redevelopment project will improve the visual appeal at this south end---of the public beach. The architectural style integrates a contemporary coastal architectural design, which is appropriate and aesthetically pleasing for this beachfront property. Excess parking spaces, adequate loading /unloading spaces and sufficient stacking space at the entrance to the parking garage will keep vehicles off of the Beach Walk area which will enhance and encourage the flow of pedestrians from the beach to the site or other properties to the south. The pool area will be located in the middle of the property between the two towers and on the fourth floor level, such that noise or visual distraction will not be a factor to the adjoining residential condominiums to the south. Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project Criteria: 1. The development or redevelopment is otherwise impractical without deviations from the use and /or development standards set forth in this zoning district. The development order approving the termination of non - conforming status as to the density of 217 overnight accommodation units (FLD2005- 05047) is currently in effect. The proposed deviations from Code, which are discussed in detail below, are necessary and minimal deviations to Code without which the project cannot be constructed at this location. The Applicant has designed the proposed redevelopment project to comply with Beach by Design guidelines to the fullest extent possible. The proposed redevelopment of this site into a resort use is highly visible from Beach Walk and is an integral part of the City's vision of Clearwater Beach as set forth in Beach by Design. Z � Het it �; The request for 150' when 100' is allowed by Code is consistent with the Design C= 1 4 J� Guidelines of Beach by Design which provide for increased height in the event of €� _J a transfer of development rights to the property. This application includes a companion transfer of development rights application for 13 overnight 0 accommodation units (equivalent to 8 residential dwelling units), which were transferred to the site from three other eligible sites on Clearwater Beach. The transfer was previously made pursuant to TDR2005- 05022. There is a reasonable relationship between the height increase for the condominium and the 13 transferred units based upon other cases recommended for approval by staff and actually approved by CDB consistent with Beach by Design. There are 50 units located above 100', many of which are the luxury suites, which are the larger, more upscale units. C. • 0 Setbacks The relief sought from setbacks is specific to setbacks to pavement or structures other than buildings and, as to the easterly and northerly boundaries, is required due to the incorporation of the Beach Walk improvements into the site and the location of the CCCL. These setback deviations will not be visually apparent due to the incorporation of the Beach Walk improvements into the site. To the extent that there are projections on higher levels that reduce the setbacks, those projections are permitted pursuant to Code section 3 -908. Relief from CCCL Setback The property is unique in that the CCCL wraps around the site and affects both the westerly and northerly boundaries. Although the structural setbacks are adequate and do not-appear obtrusive, it is not possible to meet the setback requirement from the CCCL around the entire site due to the angle at which the CCCL traverses the property. No part of any buildings or structures are located seaward of the CCCL. Access to an Arterial The property is addressed from South Gulfview and the Adam's Mark hotel has always had direct access from South Gulfview. The proposed access drive location has been modified slightly in connection with the redevelopment of the site but is in substantially the same location as access has existed for 30 years. There is no other viable access. The north side of the site is designed to connect and incorporate the Beach Walk improvements. Two -Year Development Order The Applicant requests a two -year development order due to market conditions. ?'.� The development or redevelopment will be consistent with the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan, as well as with the general purpose, LU o intent and basic planning objectives of this Code, and with the intent and ` purpose of this zoning district. � �- Overnight accommodations are allowed in the "Tourist" zoning district. Primary uses in the "Resort Facilities High" land use category are "high density L) residential /overnight accommodation." The site is located in the Clearwater Pass District of Beach by Design which is characterized as "mixed use — high rise condominiums, resort hotels, recreation and tourist and neighborhood serving uses." 3. The development or redevelopment will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of surrounding properties. 7 4. 5. The proposed project is compatible with the neighborhood, as is more particularly discussed in General Applicability Criteria 1 and Comprehensive Infill Criteria 4 below, and will not impede other development. The improvement of the site will pave the way for future redevelopment and set an example for the style of quality architecture envisioned by Beach by Design. Adjoining properties will not suffer substantial detriment as a result of the proposed development. West: The property is bounded on the west by the Gulf of Mexico. North: The adjacent property to the north is the public beach and City -owned property which will be renovated with Beach Walk improvements including public parking. The proposed development incorporates and extends the Beach Walk improvements into the project. East: The adjacent property to the east is an area of smaller mixed uses, including retail and restaurants. It is anticipated that this area will also undergo renovations, as are encouraged by Beach by Design's vision of Beach Walk. South: The adjacent property -to south is occupied by 440 West condominiums, which are 157' in height and of similar scale than the proposed project. 440 West condominiums co- existed with the Adam's Mark hotel for its entire existence of 30 years. The extension of Beach Walk in front of the property will give 440 West residents easy pedestrian access to the north and the public beach access. Elimination of traffic congestion as previously described will improve traffic flow along South Gulfview for 440 West residents. The Applicant has included a screen wall, security fence and landscaping buffer along the southerly property line in response to the requests of the 440 West residents. The proposed use shall otherwise be permitted by the underlying future land use category, be compatible with adjacent land uses, will not substantially alter the essential use and shall demonstrate compliance objectives: characteristics of the neighborhood; with one or more of the following a. The proposed use is permitted in this zoning district as a minimum standard, flexible standard or flexible development use; b. The proposed use would be a significant economic contributor to the City's economic base by diversifying the local economy or by creating jobs; c. The development proposal accommodates the expansion or redevelopment of an existing economic contributor; d. The proposed use provides for the provision of affordable housing; L V= Z M L" LU C �LU 4� 0 Q. The proposed project is compatible with the neighborhood, as is more particularly discussed in General Applicability Criteria 1 and Comprehensive Infill Criteria 4 below, and will not impede other development. The improvement of the site will pave the way for future redevelopment and set an example for the style of quality architecture envisioned by Beach by Design. Adjoining properties will not suffer substantial detriment as a result of the proposed development. West: The property is bounded on the west by the Gulf of Mexico. North: The adjacent property to the north is the public beach and City -owned property which will be renovated with Beach Walk improvements including public parking. The proposed development incorporates and extends the Beach Walk improvements into the project. East: The adjacent property to the east is an area of smaller mixed uses, including retail and restaurants. It is anticipated that this area will also undergo renovations, as are encouraged by Beach by Design's vision of Beach Walk. South: The adjacent property -to south is occupied by 440 West condominiums, which are 157' in height and of similar scale than the proposed project. 440 West condominiums co- existed with the Adam's Mark hotel for its entire existence of 30 years. The extension of Beach Walk in front of the property will give 440 West residents easy pedestrian access to the north and the public beach access. Elimination of traffic congestion as previously described will improve traffic flow along South Gulfview for 440 West residents. The Applicant has included a screen wall, security fence and landscaping buffer along the southerly property line in response to the requests of the 440 West residents. The proposed use shall otherwise be permitted by the underlying future land use category, be compatible with adjacent land uses, will not substantially alter the essential use and shall demonstrate compliance objectives: characteristics of the neighborhood; with one or more of the following a. The proposed use is permitted in this zoning district as a minimum standard, flexible standard or flexible development use; b. The proposed use would be a significant economic contributor to the City's economic base by diversifying the local economy or by creating jobs; c. The development proposal accommodates the expansion or redevelopment of an existing economic contributor; d. The proposed use provides for the provision of affordable housing; L ai LU 0.W • e. The proposed use provides for development or redevelopment in an area that is characterized by other similar development and where a land use plan amendment and rezoning would result in a spot land use or zoning designation; or f. The proposed use provides for the development of a new, and /or preservation of a working waterfront use. The proposed use meets several of these criteria. Overnight accommodations are permitted by the "Resort Facilities High" land use category and in the "Tourist" zoning district as a minimum standard, flexible standard and flexible use. Redevelopment of Clearwater Beach, is a significant economic contributor to the City. Since 2004, the property has not contributed to the economy as it was closed to guests. This proposed use is an economic contributor by increasing the number of tourists to Clearwater Beach and encouraging patronization of local businesses. The proposed project will generate new jobs in the City of Clearwater. The proposed use as overnight accommodations is characteristic of the neighborhood, as the Adam's Mark Hotel located at this site was a focal point of the southerly end of Clearwater Beach for many years. As previously discussed in General Applicability Criteria 1 and Comprehensive, Infill Criteria 4 the proposed project is compatible with the surrounding uses. 6. Flexibility with regard to use, lot width, required setbacks, height and off- street parking are justified based on demonstrated compliance with all of the following design objectives: Z ►I., LU RE �Z ® r � 00 a. The proposed development will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of the surrounding properties for uses permitted in this zoning district. The proposed use is a use permitted in the Tourist zoning district without this approval.. Surrounding properties are already developed. Public property to the north is not impacted. b. The proposed development complies with applicable design guidelines adopted by the City. The proposed Clearwater Beach Vacation Ownership project is designed to meet the requirements of Beach by Design in scale, bulk, coverage, density and character. The 150' tall section of the project is located at the North end of the site which takes advantage of the vast expanse of public beach to the North. The stepped massing of the project is derived from the massing requirements'of Beach by Design. The project layout preserves the views of the neighbors to the South and. places active spaces internal to the project site to reduce noise transmission and visual distraction to adjacent properties. The location of the units on the site provides all units in the project with water views and provides easy access for all guests to the public beach and nearby businesses. This project furthers the City's beach revitalization objective of creating a 0 "world class" address by punctuating the newly improved beachfront with a world class resort. The projects "contemporary coastal architecture" compliments the tropical vernacular envisioned in Beach by Design. We provide the following information concerning the height, tower separation, design, scale and mass criteria: Beach by Design VII, B Height and Tower Separation The project consists of two towers, one tower on the north at 150' high and the other on the south 99' -4" measured from FEMA to the top of the main roof deck. Per Beach by Design VII B: "...the height may be increased, however to one hundred fifty feet (150) if'• • Additional density is allocated to the development by transferred development rights as giscussed previously (See Item 1 page 6). • B.2 (a) Tower separation: No "portions of the building structures which exceed one hundred feet (100) (in height) are spaced at least 100' apart." The nearest structure to the southeast (440 Gulfview Boulevard) is separated from the 100' plus portion of the proposed building by approximately 150'. See Exhibit C, page =1. • "500' rule ": The Applicant chooses this Option 1 of B2 as "...no more than two (2) structures which exceed one hundred feet (100) are within five.. hundred (500)..." for this project. See Exhibit C, page 1. �L"M-e floor plate of any portion of a building that exceeds forty -five feet in height is �. I as follows: IL J va) The largest floor plate between 45' and 100' exceeds 25,000 square feet Val Vand is approximately 43,179 square feet. fib) The largest floor plate between 100' and 150' exceeds 10,000 square feet and is approximately 20,832 square feet. The Applicant requests deviations to this requirement as provided by Beach by Design. See below for discussion of mass and scale and an explanation of how the project provides a tiered effect thereby justifying such deviation. Beach by Design VII C Design, Scale and Mass of Buildings The building form is divided vertically into three components: a three -story base that animates the street edge; the body of the building which is made up to the guest units; and the cap of the building which varies from four levels to one level and consists of the luxury suites. 10 The base of the building addresses the "human scale" with the sensitively articulated architectural treatments at the first 3 levels of the building. The height of the base is compatible with and continues the scale of the buildings to the east across Gulfview Boulevard. The three -story base is perforated by generous scaled openings that clad the parking levels of the building. All openings are strategically located to screen the automobiles within. Shutters, awnings, brackets, louvered panels, and perforated metal screens are utilized to allow natural ventilation of the garage, and to conceal the visibility of vehicles within. The base of the building is capped in most locations by a standing seam metal roofing brow above the third level. This element creates the transition between the vertical stacking of the units above, and the horizontal nature of the 3 story parking base and anchors the pool deck and main public level on the fourth floor. The fourth level also incorporates shade canopies at the public deck level perimeter which form one of the key identity elements on the project. Lush landscaping is included at the entire project perimeter to soften the architecture, and to provide shade at pedestrian walkways and to enhance the beachfront character at all sides of the project. By placing all automobile parking internal to the project, automobiles are not seen and the Beach by Design goal of a pedestrian oriented beach community is realized. The body of the building varies between six and eight levels. These levels form the mid section of the building and are typified by spacious balconies and large windows. The fagade of the body of the building is typified by modulations in the floor plan that move in and out between 5' and 10' a minimum of once in each 28' structural bay. The building fagade in this area is detailed with 6' -8' deep balconies, white aluminum picket railings, window shutters, and occasionally a small awning style metal roof. The highly crafted building form creates strong shadow patterns which further define the elements of the projects form. The cap of the building contains the luxury suites in the project. The pattern of the upper levels is different from the body of the building and helps to break down the massing of the building. This is most evident on the north elevation where two 12' deep slots are cut into the upper 4 floors effectively dividing the upper mass of the building � into 3 sections. The upper level balconies at the tower corners step back 4' to create a is tiered effect. The north elevation balconies at the upper 4 floors shift location in o (-J relationship to the balconies below breaking the vertical lines of the fagade and elegantly breaking down. the building massing as seen from the north. This upper section of the building is punctuated by accent metal roof elements containing stairs to the roof, mechanical rooms, and elevator over runs and horizontal shading elements. The quantifiable aspects of the architectural vocabulary are as follows per Beach by Design: • Buildings with a footprint of greater than 5,000 square feet ... will be constructed so that no more than two of the three building dimensions in the vertical or horizontal planes are equal in length. 11 0 The building footprint is approximately 60,804 square feet. The building dimensions vary considerably so that no more two of the three building dimensions in the vertical or horizontal planes are equal in length. The project's overall horizontal plane dimensions are approximately: 207'6" wide along Gulf View Blvd, 276' deep along the north side, and 160' high from grade to the taller of the two towers main roof deck; none of these dimensions are "equal" (or vary by less than 40% of the of the shorter two lengths). In addition to these overall dimensions, the building's modulated massing provides considerable dimensional variation. • No plane (or elevation) ' of the project "...continue(s) uninterrupted for greater than one hundred (100'). The three -story base is punctuated continually with openings to the interior which satisfies this requirement for these levels. From the fourth level up building massing modulates significantly on the east and west elevations as the two towers on the south and north side are expressed; the middle section of the east elevation is recessed back approximately 40' from the tower planes; and the middle section of the west elevation is recessed back approximately 148' from the tower planes. The corners of each of the two towers are provided with. corner balconies with recessed building planes varying from 5' to 10'; this "eroded" corner treatment greatly reduces the perceived mass of the project. The north tower steps back 14' at levels 12 -16 on both the east and west ends of the north fagade thereby interrupting the plane of the building. In addition to the major tower massing definition, the planes of all the elevations provide in and out modulation of 5' to 10'; the largest uninterrupted plane on any floor plate is approximately 29' (significantly less than the maximum 100' allowed). • At least sixty percent (609,6) of any elevation will be covered with windows or architectural decoration. All of the elevations are provided with large windows (including sliding glass doors and storefront) or architectural decoration including: decorative picket railings; painted metal and decorative precast screen walls at the parking levels; standing seam roofing elements at level 3, 1.3. and high roof, painted stucco shade structures /brow projections with painted brackets at levels 4, 10, 11, 13, 15, and 16; miscellaneous painted aluminum shutters; and painted aluminum louver panels. The percentage of decoration on each of the exterior elevations are as follows, all Z- exceeding the minimum requirement of 60 %: • North elevation - 62.6% ® (D • East elevation - 70.7% LU � South elevation - 66.1% West elevation - 68.8% These percentages are noted on the architectural plans. No more than sixty percent (609,6) of the theoretical maximum building envelope located above 42' will be occupied by a building. 12 o_ cV 0 OW The overall building mass from 45' to 150' (above FEMA) calculates to 44.5 % of the theoretical maximum allowed building envelope. This is significantly less than the 60% maximum allowed building envelope. • The height and mass of buildings will be correlated to: (1) the dimensional aspects of the parcel proposed for development and (2) adjacent public spaces such as streets and parks. The height and mass of the building are correlated to the parcel and adjacent public spaces as described above. • The guideline for mixed use is not applicable. ZIx 9 Landscaping c. The design, scale and intensity of the proposed development supports the established or emerging character of an area; The proposed project is of a scale consistent with that of the Adam's Mark, which was an established landmark at this location for 30 years. The architectural style and compliance with design 'guidelines will support the emerging character of the area as envisioned by Beach by Design. The project's "contemporary coastal architecture" compliments the tropical vernacular envisioned in Beach by Design. d. In order to form a cohesive, visually. interesting and attractive appearance, the proposed development incorporates a substantial number of the following design elements: • Changes in horizontal building planes; • Use of architectural details such as columns, cornices, stringcourses, pilasters, porticos, balconies, railings, awnings, etc; • Variety in materials, colors and textures; • Distinctive fenestration patterns; • Building stepbacks; and • Distinctive roofs forms. Many of these elements have been incorporated into the design as discussed in detail in response to Criteria 6.b. above. e. The proposed development provides for appropriate buffers, enhanced landscape design and appropriate distances between buildings. 13 The landscape plan is in accordance with design guidelines set forth in Beach by Design with special emphasis on selecting plant material that is native and salt - tolerant but provides visual interest. -A comprehensive landscape program is not required as the proposed landscape plan meets or exceeds Code requirements. Gulfview Boulevard: Medjool Date Palms will be planted approximately 35' on center to provide height and scale to the building. The. pedestrian scale will be further addressed through the use of ornamental trees and accent shrubs as well as dense groundcover beds along the sidewalk. Decorative pavers will be used at the entrances to the garage and through the drop -off area to direct vehicles to the entry. Crosswalks will be paved using the standard Clearwater Beach concrete pavers and a pedestrian connection will be made; from the lobby to the sidewalk, using specialty paving such as concrete pavers or colored concrete. North Property Line: The north property line will be planted with clusters of Cabbage Palms and other salt - tolerant vegetation to create a landscape that will thrive on the site and contribute to the -overall sense of place. A pedestrian connection will be made to the existing concrete sidewalk on the south end of the adjacent parking lot. This connection will run along the back of the building and around the south side of the property. Access to this path will be controlled with a gate requiring an entrance code or keycard. Landscape treatments along the north property line will be coordinated with the Beach Walk improvements to provide a seamless feel between properties. Seawall: The area between the seawall and the building will be planted with hardy salt - tolerant vegetation that will withstand close proximity to the saltwater. A fence will be constructed along the seawall for safety. The path from the north property line will meander along the seawall and wrap around the building to the south property line. The area adjacent to the path will create opportunities for seating so guests can enjoy the view of the Gulf of Mexico. South Property Line: L" L, RE The south property line will be fenced and have a heavy landscape buffer to � Ir. shield views from the south onto the property. The pedestrian path will continue _J along the south side of the building and connect to the service drive. This exit will serve primarily as a means of emergency exit and is not meant to be used as Ui 260 a main pedestrian corridor. Special emphasis will be placed on buffering the �y eastern end of the south property line where trash pickup and the electrical room will be located. The buffer will consist of new and existing Cabbage Palms at varying heights, a dense hedge, and flowering vines growing on the fence. 14 Distances between Buildings The distances between buildings have been discussed in response to Beach by Design guidelines as set forth in Criteria 6.b. The following are additional criteria: Termination of Non - conforming Status The Applicant seeks termination of non - conforming status, in accordance with Section 6 -109 of the Code, to allow the density of 217 hotel rooms on the site. Section 6 -109 of the Code requires a level two approval to terminate status as a non- conforming use or structure with the following requirements: 1. Perimeter buffers conforming to the requirements of Section 3- 1202(C) shall be installed. Perimeter buffers are not required in the Tourist District. 2. Off- street parking lots shall be improved to meet the landscaping standards established in Section 3- 1202(D). This requirement is not applicable as all off - street parking will be enclosed in the building. 3. Any nonconforming sign, outdoor lighting or other accessory structure or accessory use located on the lot shall be terminated, removed or brought into conformity with this development code. The Applicant agrees to accept a condition of approval requiring signs to comply with Code or be approved as part of a Comprehensive Sign Program. 4. The comprehensive landscaping and comprehensive sign programs. . may be used to satisfy the requirements of this section. The proposed landscaping either meets or exceeds Code requirements as discussed in Comprehensive Infill Criteria 6.e above. As stated above, the Applicant agrees to a condition of approval requiring signs to comply with Code or approval of a Comprehensive Sign Program. Transfer of Development Rights In connection with the Applicant's request for transfers of density to the property, the following are responses to the TDR criteria of Section 4- 1403.A. 15 W__- 4 1. Perimeter buffers conforming to the requirements of Section 3- 1202(C) shall be installed. Perimeter buffers are not required in the Tourist District. 2. Off- street parking lots shall be improved to meet the landscaping standards established in Section 3- 1202(D). This requirement is not applicable as all off - street parking will be enclosed in the building. 3. Any nonconforming sign, outdoor lighting or other accessory structure or accessory use located on the lot shall be terminated, removed or brought into conformity with this development code. The Applicant agrees to accept a condition of approval requiring signs to comply with Code or be approved as part of a Comprehensive Sign Program. 4. The comprehensive landscaping and comprehensive sign programs. . may be used to satisfy the requirements of this section. The proposed landscaping either meets or exceeds Code requirements as discussed in Comprehensive Infill Criteria 6.e above. As stated above, the Applicant agrees to a condition of approval requiring signs to comply with Code or approval of a Comprehensive Sign Program. Transfer of Development Rights In connection with the Applicant's request for transfers of density to the property, the following are responses to the TDR criteria of Section 4- 1403.A. 15 1. The development of the parcel proposed for development will not reduce the fair market value of abutting properties. Please see the detailed discussion of how the project will improve abutting properties in response to General Applicability Criteria 2. The redevelopment project will increase the value of the site and neighboring parcels. 2. The uses within the project are otherwise permitted in the City of Clearwater. Overnight accommodation use is permitted in the City. 3. The uses or mix of uses within the project are compatible with adjacent land uses. Please see the detailed discussion of the how the project is compatible with adjacent land uses in the response to General Applicability Criteria 5. The site is located in the Clearwater Pass District which Beach by Design indicates as characterized as "mixed use — high rise condominiums, resort hotels, recreation and tourist and neighborhood serving uses." 4. The development of the parcel proposed for development will upgrade the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. Please see the detailed discussion of how the project will improve abutting properties in response to General Applicability Criteria 2 and 5. 5. The design of the proposed project creates a form and function which enhances the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. This site is at the south end of Beach Walk and as such, the beautification of this site through the proposed redevelopment project will have an immense favorable impact on Beach Walk, both visually and by providing an inviting pedestrian connection to the property. As discussed in detail in response to Comprehensive Infill Criteria #5, the proposed redevelopment will be an economic contributor to the City by increasing tourists to Clearwater Beach. 1/7/2008 11:57 AM' 3.2008 -2• +o PAA42il3i2007- 12.43 onn 45934.109561 ORIGIMAL #418618 v1 - TWNacation Ownership /Ex to Comp Infill REC^ r 0 7 2000 P'd AN'W' G D&M Lp t s 4 CITY or- QW, 16 Message • Page 1 of 1 Wells, Wayne From: Jayne E. Sears [JayneS @jpfirm.com] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2007 9:30 AM To: Wells, Wayne Cc: Katie Cole Subject: P.S. I actually have in my posession this a.m. the original executed affidavit from Salt Bock 57, L.L.C. As we discussed, I will bring the original to you with the "re- resubmittal" and copies will be included in all packages. Jayne E. Sears Legal Assistant Johnson, Pope, Bokor, Ruppel & Burns, LLP 911 Chestnut Street Clearwater, FL 33756 Phone: (727) 461 -1818 Fax: (727) 462 -0365 12/28/2007 From: Jayne E. Sears [JayneSQpfirm.com] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2007 9:28 AM To: Wells, Wayne; Watkins, Sherry Cc: Katie Cole Subject: FW: 430 So Gulfview Notices - FLD2007- 11034 Attached is a list of names we sent to the Clerk to add to the notice list and they are working on it. The last one on the list is Clearwater Beach Association and I did not have the address or contact info. Sherry, can you please provide to Nicole Sprague at the Clerk's office. Wayne I think they are waiting to hear from you as to the "go ahead" on the ad. Thanks so much for all of your help. Jayne E. Sears Legal Assistant Johnson, Pope, Bokor, Ruppel & Burns, LLP 911 Chestnut Street Clearwater, FL 33756 Phone: (727) 461 -1818 Fax: (727) 462 -0365 12/28/2007 '.r Page 1 of 2 .� lvi�ssage Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2007 3:01 PM To: 'Jayne E. Sears' Cc: Dougall- Sides, Leslie; Call, Rosemarie; Katie Cole; 'Deb Howard'; Ed Armstrong Subject: RE: Affidavit Jayne - Owner is Salt Block 57, LLC. Since I have the faxed copy, just include the original Affidavit with the revised original application material when you resubmit. Thanks. Wayne - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Jayne E. Sears [mailto:JayneS @jpfirm.com] Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2007 2:42 PM To: Wells, Wayne Cc: Dougall- Sides, Leslie; Call, Rosemarie; Katie Cole; 'Deb Howard'; Ed Armstrong Subject: FW: Affidavit Attached is the owner affidavit authorizing Ed Armstrong and Johnson, Pope as agent. FYI, the address and phone number of the new owner are below. I will be indicating this information on the revised application cover sheet. Salt Block, L.L.C. c/o Ocean Properties, Ltd. 1001 East Atlantic Avenue, Suite 202 Delray Beach, FL 33483 Phone (561- 279 -9900) Contact (Mark Walsh) I will provide you with the original affidavit when Fed. Ex. arrives tomorrow a.m. Thanks. Jayne E. Sears Legal Assistant Johnson, Pope, Bokor, Ruppel & Burns, LLP 911 Chestnut Street Clearwater, FL 33756 Phone: (727) 461 -1818 Fax: (727) 462 -0365 - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Deb Howard [ mailto :Deb.Howard @oplhotels.com] Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2007 2:30 PM To: Jayne E. Sears Subject: Affidavit Hello Jayne: as requested attached is a copy of the executed Affidavit 12/27/2007 " WAssage Page 2 of 2 <<Salt Block.pdf>> Deborah Howard Executive Assistant Ocean Properties Ltd. 1001 E. Atlantic Ave. Suite 202 Delray Beach, FL 33483 Phone: 561- 279 -9000 Fax: 561 - 274 -2400 deb.howard(doplhotels. com www.oplhotels.com 12/27/2007 • I #: 2007401796 BK: 16097 PG: 1397, 12/21/2007 $27.00 D DOC STAMP COLLECTION $122500,00 KEN COUNTY, FL BY DEPUTY CLERK: CLKDMC9 4 This Instrument Was Preparted" By And Should Be Retarded To: Stephen L. Kussner GrayRobinson, P.S. 201 N. Franklin Street, Suite 2200 Tampa, Florida 33602 Phone: (813),2'13 ; - 0 Property Appialsers Parcel Identification (Folio) Number: 07/24/15f52340 /000 /0330 40 at 04 :54 PM, RECORDING 3 PAGES BURKE, CLERK OF COURT PINELLAS SPECIAL WARRANTY DEED THIS SPECIAL WARRANTY DEED, executed as of the 21st day of December, 2007, ,by INDIGO BEACH, L.L.C., a Florida limited liability company formerly known as TWIBEACH Residences — Clearwater, L.L.C., a Florida limited liability company (the ".Gi antar"), whose mailing address is 877 Executive Center Drive West, Suite 205, St. lsetersburg, Florida 33702 -2472 to SALT BLOCK 57, L.L.C., a Utah limited liability company, .:whose mailing address is 1000 Market Street, Building One, Suite 300, Portsmouth, New 4` Hampshire 03801 (the "Grantee "), WITNESSETH: That Grantor, for and in consideration of the sum of $10.00 and other good and valuable consideration to Grantor in hand paid by Grantee, the receipt and sufficiency of which is acknowledged, has granted, bargained, and sold to Grantee and Grantee's successors and assigns forever, the following described real property situate, lying, and being in Pinellas County, Florida, (the "Pro a ") and described on Exhibit "A" attached hereto. Together with all casements, tenements, hereditaments, and appurtenances belonging or in anyways appertaining to the Property, and the reversion and reversions, remainder and remainders, rents, issues, and profits of the Property, and all the estate, right, title, interest, claims, and demands whatsoever of the Grantor, either in law or equity, of, in, and to the Property, with the hereditaments and appurtenances to the Property. This conveyance is subject to: all easements, conditions, restrictions, covenants, limitations, reservations and matters of record, provided, however, that this reference shall not operate to reimpose any of same; all taxes and assessments for the year 2008 and subsequent years; all laws, ordinances, governmental regulations and resolutions, including, but not limited to, all applicable building, zoning, land use and environmental ordinances and regulations; and matters which would be disclosed. by an accurate survey. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the same in fee simple forever. And Grantor covenants with Grantee that, except as above noted and as limited by the next sentence, at the time of the delivery of this special warranty deed, Grantor hereby specially warrants the title to the Property and will defend it against the lawful claims of all persons claiming by, through, or under Grantor, but not otherwise. W90039\70 - # 1194376 v3 PINELLAS COUNTY FL OFF. REC. BK 16097 PG 1398 IN WITNESS WH OF,: Grantor has executed this Special Warranty Deed as of the day and year first above written.: WITNESSES: INDIGO BEACH, L.L.C., a Florida limited liability company By: Robert E. Glantz, Vice President �2 [SEAL] STATE, :0F FLORIDA COUAI;IY OF /t/�f /tlAT � E `The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 2y of December, 2007;: by Robert E. GIantz as Vice President of INDIGO BEACH, L.L. ., a Florida limited liability company, on behalf of the limited liability company. He is personal ]mown to me or �} has produced aJOT�ARY fication. PJ E ER..nt Cm)m0O008e3916 z eral No. Ee t?xp�ss tiMQWI1 My Commission expires: 0 Rod* NQWy AML' W R. n«.• «. « «wnu...•u«.•««• u.n.uw \490039170 - # 1194376 v3 PINELLAS COUNTY FL OFF. REC. BK 16097 PG 1399 EXHIBIT "A" ' LEGAL DESCRIPTION A tract of land consisting. of Lots 33, 34 and 35 and part of Lot 36, of LLOYD -WHITE- SKINNER SUBDIVISION, according to map or plat thereof recorded in Plat 13, pages 12 and 13, of the Public 'Reaords of Pinellas County, Florida, and lands and submerged lands lying between and Southerly, Southwesterly or Westerly of the mean High water mark and the Bulkhead Line described in and set forth in Trustees of the Internal Improvement Fund of the State of Florida Ehs�laimer No. 22310, as recorded in Official Records Book 765, Page 542, of the Public Kdcords'of Pinellas County, Florida, said tract being described as follows: From the Northern most comer of said Lot 33, run South 77' 41'16" West, along the Northwesterly bound said Lot 33 and the Southwesterly extension thereof, a distance of 400.00 feet to a point oti -the Bulkhead Line described above; run thence Southeasterly along said Bulkhead Line along' a curve to the left (radius - 1247.00 feet), an arc distance of 296.79 feet, (chord bearing - South 49' 07'51" Fast); run thence North 68' 5527" East, a distance of 402.14 feet to a point on the,. Northeasterly boundary of said Lot 36; run thence Northwesterly along the Northeasterly boundaries of said Lots 36, 35, 34 and 33, which line is a curve to the right (radius - 847.00 feet), an arc distance of 235.76 feet (chord - 235,00 feet, chord bearing - North 20' 17'10" West) to the P.o.nf of Beginning. BEING THE SAME PROPERTY AS: A tract of land consisting of Lots 33, 34 and 35, and part of Lot 36, of LLOYD- WHITE- SKINNER SUBDIVISION, according to the map or plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book I3, Pages 12 and 13, of the Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida, and lands and submerged lands lying between and Southerly, Southwesterly or Westerly of the mean high water mark and the Bulkhead Line described in and set forth in Trustees of the Internal Improvement Fund of the State of Florida Disclaimer No. 22310, as recorded in Official Records Book 765, Page 542, of the Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida, said tract being described a follows: Begin at an iron pin at the Northeast corner of said Lot 33 and the West right -of -way margin of Gulf View Boulevard, said point being the True Point of Beginning; said point being the PC of a curve to the left, having a radius of 847.00 feet, and an arc distance of 235.76 feet; thence run along said curve to the left, and along the West right -of -way margin of Gulf View Boulevard, a chord bearing of South 20' 17'10" East, and a chord distance of 235.00 feet to an iron pin; thence run South 68' 55'27" West, for a distance of 402.14 feet to an iron pin, said point being the PC of a curve to the right, having a radius of 1,247.00 feet, and an arc distance of 296.79 feet; thence run along said curve to the right, a chord bearing of North 19° 07'51" West, and a chord distance of 296.09 feet to an iron pin; thence run North 77' 41'16" East, for a distance of 400.00 feet to a point and back to the True Point of Beginning. /490039170 - # 11943760 N. AFFIDAVIT TO AUTHORIZE AGENT: 1. Provide names of all property owners on dead — PRINT full names: SALT B= 57, L . L . C . , a Utah .limited liability con pany 2. That (I am/we are) the owner(s) and record title holder(s) of the following described property (address or general location): 430 South GUlfview Parcel :ED# 07/29/15/52380/000/0330-: --- ----- -- ----- ----------- - -------- ---------------- ------ ............. ........ . .... I ------------ 3. That this property constitutes the property for which a'request for a: (describe request) Flexible developutent approval for a comprehensive infill.redevelopment project and transfers of develop 'r gilts to tlZe property as.a receiver site. 4. Th t b.unriersigned (hasthavejarpointed ano (doasldoLappolnt: . MI POS Esquire and as (his /their) agent(s) to execute any petitions or other documents necessary to affect such petition; 5, 'That this affidavit has been executed to induce the City of Clearwater, Florida to consider and act on the above described property: 6. That site'visits to the property are necessary by City representatives in order to process this application and the owner authorizes City representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application; 7, That (Itwe), the undersigned authority, hereby certify that the foregoing Is true and correct. SALT 57, ----------- By: Pro V. Property Owner .......... ........... ----------- --- ------------ Property Owner J STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINE11:6AS Palm beach Before me the undersigned, . an officer duly commissioned by the laws of the State of Florida, on this 04k day of December, 2007 pus ared — ----- .... ......... who having been first duly sworn Deposes and says that he/she fully understands the contents of the affidavit that he/she signed. *as MOLY,%" U Of Salt Block 57,VL.L.C. Notary Public Signature Notary Seai/Stamp My Commission Expires: . . .... . ............... . DEBORAH HOWARD �9 P ? Notary Public..! Gligis of Florida My Commission Expires Jul 31,20W for CoMmWlon 0 DD 423611 still, So" By National N=Awn. I--- CADocuments and Saftinoslderek,ferguson%Dasktoplolanningforms 07071Comprehenslve Infill Project (FLO) 04-24-07-doc Page 8 of EF From: Jayne E. Sears [JayneS @jpfirm.com) Sent: Wednesday, December 26, 2007 1:26 PM To: Wells, Wayne Cc: Delk, Michael; Clayton, Gina; Dougall- Sides, Leslie; Ed Armstrong; Katie Cole; 'debhoward @oplhotels.com'; 'Mike Chatham'; Chuck Jones; Cyndi Tarapani; 'O Cabrera; Hunter Booth (hbooth @pgcla.com) Subject: FLD2007 -11034 - 430 S. Gulfview - Change of Ownership Wayne, thank you for your emails concerning this case being set for the Jan. 15 CDB meeting. We are working on the additional responses /revised plans that you require by Jan. 7 and expect to have everything in order. Regarding Planning Comment 14 (transfer of development rights), we need to know if there are any issues or comments to which we need to respond. On behalf of the applicant, we hereby notify the City as follows: The land which is the subject of this request was sold on Friday, December 21 to Salt Block 57, L.L.C., a Utah limited liability company. Attached is a copy of the recorded deed. We will provide you with an affidavit of the new owner authorizing Ed Armstrong and Johnson, Pope law firm as representatives. Please let us know what other items are required by the City as a result of the sale. For example, if the first page of the application should be revised to indicate a new applicant and owner. Jayne E. Sears Legal Assistant Johnson, Pope, Bokor, Ruppel & Burns, LLP 911 Chestnut Street Clearwater, FL 33756 Phone: (727) 461 -1818 Fax: (727) 462 -0365 12/26/2007 Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Monday, December 24, 2007 8:10 AM To: Jayne Sears (E- mail); Katie Cole (E -mail) Cc: mchatham @hhcp.com'; 'chuck @cgh architects.com'; Watkins, Sherry; Thompson, Neil; Clayton, Gina; Delk, Michael Subject: FLD2007- 11034/TDR2005- 05022, 430 S. Gulfview Blvd. Jayne /Katie /Mike /Chuck - Needless to say, l presumed you might understand that the above request is scheduled for the'January 15, 2008, CDB meeting. Please do not presume. It IS being scheduled for the January 15, 2008, CDB meeting. Below is the request that is being advertised (this is different than the email I sent last night): Request: (1) Termination of Status of Nonconformity for density (217 overnight accommodation units; where 93 overnight accommodation units are permitted today), under the provisions of Section 6 -109; (2) Flexible Development approval to permit 230 overnight accommodation units (timeshare /interval ownership) in the Tourist (T) District with reductions to the front (east) setback from 15 feet to zero feet (to trash staging area), reductions to the side (north) setback from the Coastal Construction Control Line (CCCL) from 10 feet to six feet (to building) and to zero feet (to sidewalk), reductions to the side (south) setback from 10 feet to three feet (to sidewalk) and to zero feet (to trash staging area), reductions to the rear (west) setback from the CCCL from 20 feet to 8.3 feet (to building) and to zero feet (to sidewalk), an increase to building height from 35 feet to 99.33 feet (to roof deck) and to 150 feet (to roof deck) for two portions of the building, a deviation to allow direct access to an arterial street and to allow a two -year time frame to submit for a building permit, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2- 803.C; and (3) including the Transfer of Development Rights of eight total dwelling units (being converted to 13 overnight accommodation units) previously approved and transferred under TDR2005- 05022, including four dwelling units from 557 and 579 Cyprus Avenue, one dwelling unit from 625 -627 Bay Esplanade and three dwelling units from 667 Bay Esplanade, under the provisions of Section 4 -1402. If there are any questions or concerns, please let me know by 10:00 am today. Thanks & Merry ChristmasHH Wayne Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Sunday, December 23, 2007 8:58 PM To: Jayne Sears (E- mail); Katie Cole (E -mail) Cc: 'mchatham @hhcp.com'; 'chuck @cgh architects.com'; Watkins, Sherry; Thompson, Neil; Clayton, Gina; Delk, Michael Subject: FLD2007- 11034/TDR2005- 05022, 430 S. Gulfview Blvd. Jayne /Katie /Mike /Chuck - Attached are the comments still listed as "not met" for this case. You do not need to address at this time the comments from General Engineering and Parks and Recreation, as these are to be met prior to the issuance of the building permit. You only need to address Planning comments now. As I have talked with Mike Chatham, I will need all revised application material (written or plans) (one original and 1.4 copies) no later than 4:00 pm on Monday, January 7, 2008 (any earlier will be greatly appreciated). The CDB packages MUST go out to the CDB members no later than Thursday, January 10, 2008. This is the final application package that will be submitted to the CDB, so any colored elevations and perspective drawings, or any other special material, must be included. If you have any questions, feel free to email or call me (727- 562 - 4504). Wayne .vas. DRC Action !nda - Remainin Message • � Page 1 of 1 Wells, Wayne From: Jayne E, Sears [JayneS @jpfirm.com] Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2007 3:20 PM To: Wells, Wayne Cc: Katie Cole Subject: 430 South Gulfview - Contacts As we discussed, here is contact info. for you: Mike Chatham (407) 644 -2656 office (407) 461 -8831 mobile mchatham @hhcp.com Chuck Jones (813) 228 -8000 office (813) 220 -6183 mobile chuck@caharchitects.com (Katie Cole's cell number if you need to contact her is 727 - 644 -4921) 12/20/2007 • s EXHIBIT "B" TO FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION FOR COMPREHENSIVE INFILL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT Indigo Beach, L.L.C. 430 South Gulfview Boulevard Section B. Description of Request Request O)JrAl a The licant_and property owner, Indigo_ Beach, L.L.C., formerly known as TW/ Beach �Deleted_Appfioant Residences - Clearwater, L.L.C., is a wholly -owned subsidiary of Taylor Woodrow, plc, a London -based organization that has operated in the U.S. for over 65 years. The subject property is the former Adam's Mark hotel site, located at 430 South Gulfview Boulevard. The licant proposes to redevelop the _ property with _ 230 OV ----- t - -- Deleted: Applicant -- -- - ern accommodation units. Specifically, the 6,pplicant _seeks flexible development__approval of a __ - Comprehensive - Deleted: Applicant Infill Redevelopment Project, in accordance with the plans submitted with this application, including relief as follows: a. Termination of hiatus _.._ofNenconformity , far density 217 overnight_ -_ -- Deleted: non - conforming status to "` '- ---- -- - accommodation units as established by FLD -01005 and FLD2005- allow th e existing — -- - — - 05047, whereN_rooms (1.87_acres at 50 units /acre) are -allowed by the__ - - - -- Deleted: 106 current zoning (Tourist) and land use designation (RFH); b. Transfers of development rights (8 residential dwelling units, being converted to 13 overnight accommodation units) previously transferred to the site from three sender sites pursuant to TDR2005- 05022, i cl_udin.9..._four...._d el .lin..9..._u_nits...._from...._ 557...._ and...._5_�9.._C.v. rus.___Aven_ue:.._one. dwelling unit from 625 -627 Bay Es Esplanade and three dwellinq units from �Q7 _ a.Y.._ _s p_ ia_ nade,.. _un,der._the._provisions.._at.. ection...4.- .1.402; c. An increase of the maximum building height_._ from.. 35'.._tca_....1.50' (to roof deck to allow two proposed towers, one with a height of 150' -0" to roof deck and one with a height of 99' -4" to roof deck; d. Relief from CCCL setback to allow uildin located 7' landward of the -- CCCL_,_a_nd.._ sidewalk located __0.._.feet._. from .__the _._CCCL on the north side (where 1 Q' is required} and building located 8' landward of the CCCL and sidewalk located zero feet from the CCCL on the west sidee (where_ ,2__0'_js _f__ required); e. A front (east) setback along Gulfview Boulevard for structures other than buildings of V to pavement, where 0' to 15' is required by Code; ORIGI RECW DEC 14 2007 CffY®FCL ✓ATER ............ Deleted: structures ....................................................................... ............................... Deleted:, Deleted a Deleted: setback f. A side (north) setback for structures other than buildings of sidewalk, where 01 10' is required by Code; ______ _ -.- Deleted:- g. A side (south) setback for structures other than buildings of 3' to sidewalk and 0' to trash hoidin slab where 0' to 10' is required by Code;___ - h. A rear (west) setback for structures other than buildings of 6' from seawall to sidewalk where 0' to 20' is required by Code;_________ ___ _ _ __ ______ i. Direct access to an arterial street, South Gulfview Boulevard and Approval of a two-year development order. History The property is the site of the former Adam's Mark Hotel which was built in 1975 and was a landmark at the southerly end of Clearwater Beach for almost 30 years. The hotel closed its doors after sustaining damage from Hurricane Jeanne in September, 2004, and on April 19, 2005, the Community Development Board approved a termination of nonconforming status as to density and granted flexible development approval for height (155'), setbacks, reduced parking and other existing nonconformities in order to allow the hotel to be renovated (FLD2005- 01005). The hotel renovation never occurred and site was purchased on June 3, 2005 by the - licant. - - - -- ----- - - - - -- August 16, 2005, the 6pplicant _ received approval of termination of non - conforming_ -- ------ -- - -- ------------- - - -- -- ------------------------------------------------ status as to density (217 hotel rooms), transfers of development rights and flexible development approval as to increased height and other development parameters in order to allow redevelopment of the site with 112 residential condominiums and 78 condominium -hotel units (FLD2005- 05047lTDR2005- 05022). Anticipating the approved redevelopment, the,6pplicant demolished the Adam's Mark on October 8, 2005. The_- --------------------------- - - -- - -- - - -- ------------------------------------------------------------- City approved several minor revisions and granted extensions to the approved site plan /development order; however, changes in the real estate market have caused the licant _ to___modify_ the__ proposed __use of_ _the__property__to__provide__for overnight --_ 'accommodations. Proposed Use _ ....................._ ....._. ........ _. _..__._..._._..__..........._.. Deleted: - Deleted: and ......................... ......_- .............. ........................................... --_ ............ ...._; ........--- ._ .................._.__....... Deleted: Applicant Deleted: Applicant Deleted: Applicant Deleted: Applicant The,6pplicant proposes to redevelop_ the site with a vacation/interval - ownership_project _-- -. Deleted _Appri -ant— _ _ consisting of 230 overnight accommodation units. Buyers purchase a one - fifty- second fee simple interest in a unit and receive a deed as a tenant -in- common in the unit. Each buyer has the right to use his time in increments as small as a day and as large as a week. The property would include one poolside restaurant and bar. The property's guest services will encourage guests to patronize local eateries and entertainment activities. 2 Section D. Written Submittal Requirements General Applicability Criteria: 1) The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. West: The property is bounded on the west by the Gulf of Mexico. North: The adjacent property to the north is the public beach and City -owned property, including a public parking lot, which is currently being renovated with Beach Walk improvements. The proposed development incorporates and extends the Beach Walk improvements into the project, through extension of a 10' -wide shell finish concrete sidewalk, use of decorative pavers and planting of Medjool Date Palms. East:. The adjacent property to the east is an area of smaller m ixed uses, including hotel, condominium, retail and restaurants. It is anticipated that this area will also be undergoing renovations, as are encouraged by Beach by Design's vision of Beach Walk. The height of the three -story base of the building is compatible with and reflects the s_ cale of the bu_ ildings to the east across Gulfview Boulevard as those buildings are generally 4 stories. South: The adjacent property to south is occupied by 440 West condominiums, which are 157' in height and of similar scale than the proposed project. The scale, bulk, coverage and density of the proposed project are in keeping with the Design Guidelines set forth in Beach by Design for projects including approvals of transfers of density and increased building height. Please see the more detailed discussion of these criteria in response to Comprehensive Infill Criteria No.6.b. in this exhibit. 2) The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. The proposed project will enhance this area of the beach in a number of ways, including: (1) Superior architectural design, including a tiered effect along. Gulfview Boulevard, and lush landscaping which will visually enhance the neighborhood; (2) Construction which meets current building Codes; (3) Excess parking, adequate stacking space and loading area, in order to eliminate any traffic congestion at the site and eliminate potential off -site parking in public lots. The parking is designed to accommodate staff, 3 Deleted: continues Comment: 421 S. Gulfview, 4 story ,hotel 431 S. Gulfview, 2 story, retail /restaurant 437 S. Gulfview, 2 story. retail /restaurant 455 S. Gulfview, 4 story hotel /condo 3) guests and overnight visitors as well as provide adequate space forlaxis and airport shuttles; (4) Beach Walk improvements incorporated into the site provide for a better pedestrian flow along South Gulfview than what currently exists; (5) Property value will significantly increase; and (6) The transient occupants of the proposed project will be potential clientele of nearby restaurants and other businesses. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use. -- Deleted: ; The construction of the Beach Walk improvements by the licant, including 10'- { Deleted: Applicant wide shell finish concrete sidewalks, will improve the pedestrian flow and safety F -' Deleted: _ along South Gulfview and the north side of the property. A fence will be - - - - -- Inserted: _ constructed along the seawall and northerly and southerly property line for safety _-_— purposes. Traffic congestion will be minimized as described in Criteria 4 below. With regard to health, safety and welfare, the proposed development and structure will comply as required with applicable codes including the Florida Building Code, the Life Safety Code and the Florida Fire Prevention Code. Fire Department Access shall comply with NFPA 1 Chapter 18 with Gulf View Boulevard serving as the access road, and more specifically that the access road will extend to within 50' of a single exterior door per 18.2.2.2, an approved route around the exterior of the structure measures not more than 450' from the access road and the building is equipped with sprinklers per 18.2.2.2.3.1 and 18.2.2.3.2. 4) The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. The licant has submitted with this application a narrative entitled 'Review of - Deleted: Applicant Need for a Traffic Study" prepared by Roy E. Chapman, P.E., Florida Design Consultants, Inc. which concludes that a traffic study should not be required. There are a number of ways in which the project has been designed to minimize traffic congestion on South Gulfview Boulevard: (1) The entrance to the parking garage will have 150' of stacking space, using the drop -off lane. This will allow adequate room for stacking of vehicles entering or exiting the garage so as not to interfere with traffic flow on South Gulfview. Additionally. vehicles can use the drop -off area in the front to pull off of the street and onto the Property to avoid backups onto Gulfview. (2) 1-78 - ..,parking spaces _in__ excess of the__ minimum Code_ requirement are,,',. � provided so uests and overnight visitors will not have to wait fors -paces or circle the garage lookinq for a parking space therefore allowing traffic to flow smoothly --------------- - -- into the parking garagepff the public street, Uue_to- seasonal_conclestion on_the , beach and the lack to date of new public arkin facilities, the licant desires - - - -- -- - -- - -- - to insure that..._a1i.... Parkin. g.._ deman_ ds.._ ofi.._ tfte... ..P�olectcan..._be..._acco ..-n .c3dated.._an..._site.:. 4 Deleted: 186 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ............ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Deleted: traffic Deleted: will { Deleted: as there will not be a back- up of vehicles looking for parking Deleted: [416 spaces provided, where 230 spaces (1 space /unit) are required] Deleted: applicant 0 0 Therfarethe buiidin °s desi n provides for more harking than rec{uired b Code to res and to this concern. 4Q3 s as aces ravided. where 23Q spaces 1 space/unit) are re tjired . (3) Three parking spaces have been designated on the site plan as taxi spaces. There is also a drop -off lane in front of the building. (4) As shown on the proposed site plan, there is a loading /unloading area provided at the southeast corner of the site. This area will be used for trash pick- up and may be used by large delivery vehicles so they will not block traffic on South Gulfview. Generally, due to the use of the Property, smaller - scaled delivery vehicles will use the drop -off area at the front of the Property and parking garage. (5) The garage is designed so the resort can provide valet parking service for some guests. 5) The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. The property is located within and at the northern end of the "Clearwater Pass District" of Clearwater Beach. The project will function as a southerly "bookend" to the "Beach Walk District." The project is also consistent with the community character of the "Clearwater Pass District" which Beach by Design describes as an area of mixed uses including high rise condos and resort hotels. As to the immediate vicinity, to the west is the Gulf of Mexico and the parcel to the north is the public beach and area being renovated by the City of Clearwater with Beach Walk improvements. The licant_is incorporating the _Beach ...-- Walk_-loeiete` d:Apar��t improvements into the property and providing improvements in the City right -of- way to the north of the property as envisioned by Beach by Design, including a 10' -wide shell sidewalk and Medjool palms. The parcel to the south is occupied by 440 West Condominiums, having a height of 157'. This development was built in 1975 and co- existed for 30 years with the 155' high Adam's Mark hotel. The proposed project is of a superior architectural design to the Adam's Mark building and incorporates Beach by Design guidelines therefore enhancing the 440 West property. To the east are mixed retail and overnight accommodation uses. This area is also expected to be affected and improved by Beach Walk. Guests of the proposed project may be prospective clientele of the mixed uses to the east. 6) The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts on adjacent properties. 5 s • The proposed redevelopment project will improve the visual appeal at this south end of the public beach. The architectural style integrates a contemporary coastal architectural design, which is appropriate and aesthetically pleasing for this beachfront property. Excess parking spaces, adequate loading /unloading spaces and sufficient stacking space at the entrance to the parking garage will keep vehicles off of the Beach Walk area which will enhance and encourage the flow of pedestrians from the beach to the site or other properties to the south. The pool area will be located in the middle of the property between the two towers and on the fourth floor level, such that noise or visual distraction will not be a factor to the adjoining residential condominiums to the south. Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project Criteria: 1. The development or redevelopment is otherwise impractical without deviations from the use and /or development standards set forth in this zoning district. The development order approving the termination of non - conforming status as to the density of 217 overnight accommodation units (FLD2005- 05047) is currently in effect. The proposed deviations from Code, which are discussed in detail below, are necessary and minimal deviations to Code without which the project cannot be constructed at this location. The 6pplican t has designed_ the proposed ...- Deleted: Apphca t redevelopment project to comply with Beach by Design guidelines to the fullest extent possible. The proposed redevelopment of this site into a resort use is highly visible from Beach Walk and is an integral part of the City's vision of Clearwater Beach as set forth in Beach by Design. Height The request for 150' when 100' is allowed by Code is consistent with the Design Guidelines of Beach by Design which provide for increased height in the event of a transfer of development rights to the property. This application includes a companion transfer of development rights application for 13 overnight accommodation units (equivalent to 8 residential dwelling units), which were transferred to the site from three other eligible sites on Clearwater Beach. The transfer was previously made pursuant to TDR2005- 05022. There is a reasonable relationship between the height increase for the condominium and the 13 transferred units based upon other cases recommended for approval by staff and actually approved by CDB consistent with Beach by Design. There are 50 units located above 100', many of which are the luxury suites, which are the larger, more upscale units. 11 Setbacks The relief sought from setbacks is specific to setbacks to pavement or structures other than buildings and, as to the easterly and northerly boundaries, is required due to the incorporation of the Beach Walk improvements into the site and the location of the CCCL. These setback deviations will not be visually apparent due to the incorporation of the Beach Walk improvements into the site. To the extent that there are projections on higher levels that reduce the setbacks, those projections are permitted pursuant to Code section 3 -908. Relief from CCCL Setback The property is unique in that the CCCL wraps around the site and affects both the westerly and northerly boundaries. Although the structural setbacks are adequate and do not appear obtrusive, it is not possible to meet the _Setback -- -,Deleted: 20' requirement from the CCCL around the entire site due to the angle at which_ the -- - Deleted: forthe nti-------------------- .. ............................... g CCCL traverses the property. No part of any buildings or structures are located seaward of the CCCL. Access to an Arterial The property is addressed from South Gulfview and the Adam's Mark hotel has always had direct access from South Gulfview. The proposed access drive location has been modified slightly in connection with the redevelopment of the site but is in substantially the same location as access has existed for 30 years. There is no other viable access. The north side of the site is designed to connect and incorporate the Beach Walk improvements. Two -Year Development Order The .Applicant re guests a two-year development order due to market conditions. 2. The development or redevelopment will be consistent with the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan, as well as with the general purpose, intent and basic planning objectives of this Code, and with the intent and purpose of this zoning district. Overnight accommodations are allowed in the "Tourist" zoning district. Primary uses in the "Resort Facilities High" land use category are "high density residential /overnight accommodation." The site is located in the Clearwater Pass District of Beach by Design which is characterized as "mixed use — high rise condominiums, resort hotels, recreation and tourist and neighborhood serving uses." 3. The development or redevelopment will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of surrounding properties. 7 Formatted: Underline Deleted: Applicant The proposed project is compatible with the neighborhood, as is more particularly discussed in General Applicability Criteria 1 and Comprehensive Infill Criteria 4 below, and will not impede other development. The improvement of the site will pave the way for future redevelopment and set an example for the style of quality architecture envisioned by Beach by Design. 4. Adjoining properties will not suffer substantial detriment as a result of the proposed development. West: The property is bounded on the west by the Gulf of Mexico. North: The adjacent property to the north is the public beach and City -owned property which will be renovated with Beach Walk improvements including public parking. The proposed development incorporates and extends the Beach Walk improvements into the project. East: The adjacent property to the east is an area of smaller mixed uses, including retail and restaurants. It is anticipated that this area will also undergo renovations, as are encouraged by Beach by Design's vision of Beach Walk. South: The adjacent property to south is occupied by 440 West condominiums, which are 157' in height and of similar scale than the proposed project. 440 West condominiums co- existed with the Adam's Mark hotel for its entire existence of 30 years. The extension of Beach Walk in front of the property will give 440 West residents easy pedestrian access to the north and the public beach access. Elimination of traffic congestion as previously described will improve traffic flow along South Gulfview for 440 West residents. The 6pplicant has included a Deleted: Appiint ----- - - - - -- — ------- .._....__. screen wall, security fence and landscaping buffer along the southerly property line in response to the requests of the 440 West residents. 5. The proposed use shall otherwise be permitted by the underlying future land use category, be compatible with adjacent land uses, will not substantially alter the essential use characteristics of the neighborhood; and shall demonstrate compliance with one or more of the following objectives: a. The proposed use is permitted in this zoning district as a minimum standard, flexible standard or flexible development use; b. The proposed use would be a significant economic contributor to the City's economic base by diversifying the local economy or by creating jobs; c. The development proposal accommodates the expansion or redevelopment of an existing economic contributor; d. The proposed use provides for the provision of affordable housing; • • e. The proposed use provides for development or redevelopment in an area that is characterized by other similar development and where a land use plan amendment and rezoning would result in a spot land use or zoning designation; or f. The proposed use provides for the development of a new, and /or preservation of a working waterfront use. The proposed use meets several of these criteria. Overnight accommodations are permitted by the "Resort Facilities High" land use category and in the "Tourist" zoning district as a minimum standard, flexible standard and flexible use. Redevelopment of Clearwater Beach is a significant economic contributor to the City. Since 2004, the property has not contributed to the economy as it was closed to guests. This proposed use is an economic contributor by increasing the number of tourists to Clearwater Beach and encouraging patronization of local businesses. The proposed project will generate new jobs in the City of Clearwater. The proposed use as overnight accommodations is characteristic of the neighborhood, as the Adam's Mark Hotel located at this site was a focal point of the southerly end of Clearwater Beach for many years. As previously discussed in General Applicability Criteria 1 and Comprehensive Infill Criteria 4 the proposed project is compatible with the surrounding uses. 6. Flexibility with regard to use, lot width, required setbacks, height and off- street parking are justified based on demonstrated compliance with all of the following design objectives: a. The proposed development will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of the surrounding properties for uses permitted in this zoning district. The proposed use is a use permitted in the Tourist zoning district without this approval. Surrounding properties are already developed. Public property to the north is not impacted. b. The proposed development complies with applicable design guidelines adopted by the City. The proposed Clearwater Beach Vacation Ownership project is designed to meet the requirements of Beach by Design in scale, bulk, coverage, density and character. The 150' tall section of the project is located at the North end of the site which takes advantage of the vast expanse of public beach to the North. The stepped massing of the project is derived from the massing requirements of Beach by Design. The project layout preserves the views of the neighbors to the South and places active spaces internal to the project site to reduce noise transmission and visual distraction to adjacent properties. The location of the units on the site provides all units in the project with water views and provides easy access for all guests to the public beach and nearby businesses. This project furthers the City's beach revitalization objective of creating a 9 0 0 "world class" address by punctuating the newly improved beachfront with a world class resort. The projects "contemporary coastal architecture" compliments the tropical vernacular envisioned in Beach by Design. We provide the following information concerning the height, tower separation, design, scale and mass criteria: Beach by Design VII, B Height and Tower Separation The project consists of two towers, one tower on the north at 150' high and the other on the south 99'-4" measured from FEMA to the top of the main roof deck. Per Beach by Design VII B: "...the height may be increased, however to one hundred fifty feet (150) if'. • Additional density is allocated to the development by transferred development rights as discussed previously (See Item 1 page 6). • B.2 (a) Tower separation: No "portions of the building structures which exceed one hundred feet (100) (in height) are spaced at least 100' apart." The nearest structure to the southeast (440 Gulfview Boulevard) is separated from the 100' plus portion of the proposed building by approximately 150'. See Exhibit C, page 1. • "500' rule ": The 6pplicant chooses_ this Option 1 of B2 as "...no more than two--"-. Deleted: applicant - - - - -- - - -- ----- - - - - -- - - - -- (2) structures which exceed one hundred feet (100) are within five hundred (500)... "for this project. See Exhibit C, page 1. The floor plate of any portion of a building that exceeds forty -five feet in height is limited as follows: a) The largest floor plate between 45' and 100' exceeds 25,000 square feet and is approximately 43,179 square feet. b) The largest floor plate between 100' and 150' exceeds 10,000 square feet and is approximately 20,832 square feet. The,6pplicant requests deviations to this requirement as provided by Beach by -. -- �e�eted Applicant - -- --- - - - - -- - -- - - - - -- - - -- - - - -- - Design. See below for discussion of mass and scale and an explanation of how the project provides a tiered effect thereby iustifying such deviation. Beach by Design VII C Design, Scale and Mass of Buildings The building form is divided vertically into three components ........... a. three -story base that animates the street edge; the body of the building which is made up to the guest units;, and the cap of the building which varies from four levels to one level and consists of the luxury suites. 10 0 - 0 The base of the building addresses the "human scale" with the sensitively articulated architectural treatments at the first 3 levels of the building. The height of the base is compatible with and continues the scale of the buildings to the east across Gulfview Boulevard. The three -story base is perforated by generous scaled openings that clad the parking levels of the building. All openings are strategically located to screen the automobiles within. Shutters, awnings, brackets, louvered panels, and perforated metal screens are utilized to allow natural ventilation of the garage, and to conceal the visibility of vehicles within. The base of the building is capped in most locations by a standing seam metal roofing brow above the third level. This element creates the transition between the vertical stacking of the units above, and the horizontal nature of the 3 story parking base and anchors the pool deck and main public level on the fourth floor. The fourth level also incorporates shade canopies at the public deck level perimeter which form one of the key identity elements on the project. Lush landscaping is included at the entire project perimeter to soften the architecture, and to provide shade at pedestrian walkways and to enhance the beachfront character at all sides of the project. By placing all automobile parking internal to the project, automobiles are not seen and the Beach by Design goal of a pedestrian oriented beach community is realized. The body of the building varies between six and eight levels. These levels form the mid section of the building and are typified by spacious balconies and large windows. The fagade of the body of the building is typified by modulations in the floor plan that move in and out between 5' and 10' a minimum of once in each 28' structural bay. The building fagade in this area is detailed with 6' -8' deep balconies, white aluminum picket railings, window shutters, and occasionally a small awning style metal roof. The highly crafted building form creates strong shadow patterns which further define the elements of the projects form. The cap of the building contains the luxury suites in the project. The pattern of the upper levels is different from the body of the building and helps to break down the massing of the building. This is most evident on the north elevation where two 12' deep slots are cut into the upper 4 floors effectively dividing the upper mass of the building into 3 sections. The upper level balconies at the tower corners step back 4' to create a tiered effect. The north elevation balconies at the upper 4 floors shift location in relationship to the balconies below breaking the vertical lines of the fagade and elegantly breaking down the building massing as seen from the north. This upper section of the building is punctuated by accent metal roof elements containing stairs to the roof, mechanical rooms, and elevator over runs and horizontal shading elements. The quantifiable aspects of the architectural vocabulary are as follows per Beach by Design: • Buildings with a footprint of greater than 5,000 square feet ... will be constructed so that no more than two of the three building dimensions in the vertical or horizontal planes are equal in length. 11 0 0 The building footprint is approximately 60,804 square feet. The building dimensions vary considerably so that no more two of the three building dimensions in the vertical or horizontal planes are equal in length. The project's overall horizontal plane dimensions are approximately: 207'6" wide along Gulf View Blvd, 276' deep along the north side, and 160' high from grade to the taller of the two towers main roof deck; none of these dimensions are "equal" (or vary by less than 40% of the of the shorter two lengths). In addition to these overall dimensions, the building's modulated massing provides considerable dimensional variation. • No plane (or elevation) of the project "...continue(s) uninterrupted for greater than one hundred (100'). The three -story base is punctuated continually with openings to the interior which satisfies this requirement for these levels. From the fourth level up building massing modulates significantly on the east and west elevations as the two towers on the south and north side are expressed; the middle section of the east elevation is recessed back approximately 40' from the tower planes; and the middle section of the west elevation is recessed back approximately 148' from the tower planes. The corners of each of the two towers are provided with corner balconies with recessed building planes varying from 5' to 10'; this "eroded" corner treatment greatly reduces the perceived mass of the project. The north tower steps back 14' at levels 12 -16 on both the east and west ends of the north facade thereby interrupting the plane of the building. In addition to the major tower massing definition, the planes of all the elevations provide in and out modulation of 5' to 10'; the largest uninterrupted plane on any floor plate is approximately 29' (significantly less than the maximum 100' allowed). • At least sixty percent (605,6) of any elevation will be covered with windows or architectural decoration. All of the elevations are provided with large windows (including sliding glass doors and storefront) or architectural decoration including: decorative picket railings; painted metal and decorative precast screen walls at the parking levels; standing seam roofing elements at level 3, 13 and high roof, painted stucco shade structures /brow projections with painted brackets at levels 4, 10, 11, 13, 15, and 16; miscellaneous painted aluminum shutters; and painted aluminum louver panels. The percentage of decoration on each of the exterior elevations are as follows all exceeding the minimum requirement of 601,; A North elevation - 62.6``ly ......................................_........_......................................_.............. ............................... • East elevation - 70.7% South elevation - 66.1% West elevation - 68.8% ....................................... .............................. _...._.._.._._ .._.................. .......... These ercenta es are noted on the architectural pla n • No more than sixty percent (60916) of the theoretical maximum building envelope located above 42' will be occupied by a building. 12 0 • The overall building mass from 45' to 150' (above FEMA) calculates to 44_5 % of the theoretical maximum allowed building envelope. This is significantly less than the 60% maximum allowed building envelope. • The height and mass of buildings will be correlated to: (1) the dimensional aspects of the parcel proposed for development and (2) adjacent public spaces such as streets and parks. The height and mass of the building are correlated to the parcel and adjacent public spaces as described above. • The guideline for mixed use is not applicable. c. The design, scale and intensity of the proposed development supports the established or emerging character of an area; The proposed project is of a scale consistent with that of the Adam's Mark, which was an established landmark at this location for 30 years. The architectural style and compliance with design guidelines will support the emerging character of the area as envisioned by Beach by Design. The project's "contemporary coastal architecture" compliments the tropical vernacular envisioned in Beach by Design. d. In order to form a cohesive, visually interesting and attractive appearance, the proposed development incorporates a substantial number of the following design elements: • Changes in horizontal building planes; • Use of architectural details such as columns, cornices, stringcourses, pilasters, porticos, balconies, railings, awnings, etc; • Variety in materials, colors and textures; • Distinctive fenestration patterns; • Building stepbacks; and • Distinctive roofs forms. Many of these elements have been incorporated into the design as discussed in detail in response to Criteria 6.b. above. e. The proposed development provides for appropriate buffers, enhanced landscape design and appropriate distances between buildings. Landscaping 13 0 0 The landscape plan is in accordance with design guidelines set forth in Beach by Design with special emphasis on selecting plant material that is native and salt - tolerant but provides visual interest. A comprehensive landscape program is not required as the proposed landscape plan meets or exceeds Code requirements. Gulfview Boulevard: Medjool Date Palms will be planted approximately 35' on center to provide height and scale to the building. The pedestrian scale will be further addressed through the use of ornamental trees and accent shrubs as well as dense groundcover beds along the sidewalk. Decorative pavers will be used at the entrances to the garage and through the drop -off area to direct vehicles to the entry. Crosswalks will be paved using the standard Clearwater Beach concrete pavers and a pedestrian connection will be made, from the lobby to the sidewalk, using specialty paving such as concrete pavers or colored concrete. North Property Line: The north property line will be planted with clusters of Cabbage Palms and other salt - tolerant vegetation to create a landscape that will thrive on the site and contribute to the overall sense of place. A pedestrian connection will be made to the existing concrete sidewalk on the south end of the adjacent parking lot. This connection will run along the back of the building and around the south side of the property. Access to this path will be controlled with a gate requiring an entrance code or keycard. Landscape treatments along the north property line will be coordinated with the Beach Walk improvements to provide a seamless feel between properties. Seawall: The area between the seawall and the building will be planted with hardy salt - tolerant vegetation that will withstand close proximity to the saltwater. A fence will be constructed along the seawall for safety. The path from the north property line will meander along the seawall and wrap around the building to the south property line. The area adjacent to the path will create opportunities for seating so guests can enjoy the view of the Gulf of Mexico. South Property Line: The south property line will be fenced and have a heavy landscape buffer to shield views from the south onto the property. The pedestrian path will continue along the south side of the building and connect to the service drive. This exit will serve primarily as a means of emergency exit and is not meant to be used as a main pedestrian corridor. Special emphasis will be placed on buffering the eastern end of the south property line where trash pickup and the electrical room will be located. The buffer will consist of new and existing Cabbage Palms at varying heights, a dense hedge, and flowering vines growing on the fence. 14 • Distances between Buildings .7 The distances between buildings have been discussed in response to Beach by Design guidelines as set forth in Criteria 6.b. The following are additional criteria: Termination of Non - conforming Status r--....-- ...... .._..._..._ ............._....._........_.-_. .....................- ......... The licant seeks termination of non-conforming status, in accordance with Section - -_- Deleted: Applicant - ------------------------------------------- - - - - -- ---------------------------- - - - - -- - ....... ........................- .....— 6 -109 of the Code, to allow the jiensity of 217 hotel roomspn the site. Deleted existing -- Deleted. (162 residential dwelling Section 6 -109 of the Code requires a level two approval to terminate status as a non- units )toremaln conforming use or structure with the following requirements: 1. Perimeter buffers conforming to the requirements of Section 3- 1202(C) shall be installed. Perimeter buffers are not required in the Tourist District. 2. Off - street parking lots shall be improved to meet the landscaping standards established in Section 3- 1202(D). This requirement is not applicable as all off - street parking will be enclosed in the building. 3. Any nonconforming sign, outdoor lighting or other accessory structure or accessory use located on the lot shall be terminated, removed or brought into conformity with this development code. The &plican t agrees to accept_ a condition of approval requiring signs to - {Deleted Applicant —_ _ - - - - - - - - -- - - -- comply with Code or be approved as part of a Comprehensive Sign Program. 4. The comprehensive landscaping and comprehensive sign programs may be used to satisfy the requirements of this section. The proposed landscaping either meets or exceeds Code requirements as discussed in Comprehensive Infill Criteria 6.e above. As stated above, the licant agrees to a condition of approval requiring signs to comply with - -- oeleiea_Applioant Code or approval of a Comprehensive Sign Program. Transfer of Development Rights In connection with the licant's request for - transfers of density to the property, . -- Deleted: Appllcant the following are responses to the TDR criteria of Section 4- 1403.A. 15 • • 1. The development of the parcel proposed for development will not reduce the fair market value of abutting properties. Please see the detailed discussion of how the project will improve abutting properties in response to General Applicability Criteria 2. The redevelopment project will increase the value of the site and neighboring parcels. 2. The uses within the project are otherwise permitted in the City of Clearwater. Overnight accommodation use is permitted in the City. 3. The uses or mix of uses within the project are compatible with adjacent land uses. Please see the detailed discussion of the how the project is compatible with adjacent land uses in the response to General Applicability Criteria 5. The site is located in the Clearwater Pass District which Beach by Design indicates as characterized as "mixed use — high rise condominiums, resort hotels, recreation and tourist and neighborhood serving uses." 4. The development of the parcel proposed for development will upgrade the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. Please see the detailed discussion of how the project will improve abutting properties in response to General Applicability Criteria 2 and 5. S. The design of the proposed project creates a form and function which enhances the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. This site is at the south end of Beach Walk and as such, the beautification of this site through the proposed redevelopment project will have an immense favorable impact on Beach Walk, both visually and by providing an inviting pedestrian connection to the property. As discussed in detail in response to Comprehensive Infill Criteria #5, the proposed redevelopment will be an economic contributor to the City by increasing tourists to Clearwater Beach. 12/13/200712:41 PM _- F -_ - - -- Deleted: 12/13/200711:37AM --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 45934.109561 -:- :-- :- #418618 v1 - TW/Vacation Ownership /Ex to Comp Infill Inserted: 12/13/2007 11:37 AM Deleted: 12/7/2007 9:12 AM 16 • RESPONSES TO COMMENTS FLD2007 -11034 430 S. GULFVIEW BOULEVARD 0 GENERAL ENGINEERING: Prior to Issuance of a Building Permit: Comment No. 1: Sidewalk and driveway treatment shall be subject to the approval of a separate right -of -way permit. Contact Don Melone (727) 562 -4798 in Room #220 at the MSB (Municipal Services Building). Response No. 1: Acknowledged. Comment No. 2: Brick paver driveways shall be constructed in compliance with Clearwater's Contract Specifications and Standards Index # 116. Response No. 2: Acknowledged. Please refer to Note on Sheet 3. Comment No. 3: Provide a note or dimension on the plan indicating that the Fire Department Connection (FDC) shall be located no closer than 40 -feet and no further than 100 -feet from the nearest Fire Hydrant Assembly (FHA). Response No. 3: See specific note 8 on revised civil plans (Sheet 10A). Comment No. 4: Need to provide sufficient evidence the fire flows will be adequate to support this development. Response No. 4: See fire flow calculation worksheet included with this resubmittal. Comment No. 5: Ductile iron pipe shall be installed between any tap and water meter. Ductile iron pipe shall be installed between any tap and backflow preventor device. At least one joint of ductile iron pipe shall be installed on the service side of any back flow preventor device. Response No.5: Acknowledged. Please refer to Note 6 on Sheet 10. Comment No. 6: Storm sewer manhole cover(s) shall not have the words "Clearwater" or City of Clearwater" on them as the system is a private system. Please revise accordingly. Response No. 6: See revised .plans, Sheet 11 — Index 201. ORIGINAL . RECEiYEP DEC 13 2007 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CII E �� 0, VR 0 .0 Comment No. 7: If the proposed use of the property includes a restaurant, show grease trap location on the plan. Response No. 7: To be included on construction plans if required. Comment No. 8: Note: City of Clearwater Contract Specifications and standards Index 109 requires handicapped ramps to be constructed per F.D.O.T. Design Standards Index 304 with a truncated dome surface. Response No. 8: Acknowledged. Please refer to Index 109 on Sheet 11. Comment No. 9: Applicant shall pay all applicable sewer and water impact fees. Response No. 9: Acknowledged. Prior to Issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy: Applicant shall submit 5 sets of as -built drawings that are signed and sealed by a professional engineer or land surveyor registered in the- State of Florida. Construction Services Inspector will field inspect as -built drawings for accuracy. Response: Acknowledged General Note: If the proposed project necessitates infrastructure modifications to satisfy site - specific water capacity and pressure requirements and /or wastewater capacity requirements, the modifications shall be completed by the applicant and at their expense. If underground water mains and hydrants are to be installed, the installation shall be completed and in service prior to construction in accordance with Fire Department requirements. General Note: DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. Response: Acknowledged ENVIRONMENTAL: No Issues. FIRE: ORIGINAL RECEIVED DEC 13 2007 2 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF c" 0 0 Comment No. 1: The design of the Fire Standpipe /Sprinkler System must be designed to negate the use of any Pressure Regulating Devices (PRO) in order to provide a safe working environment for Firefighter usage. This may require design as a zoned system. Acknowledge PRIOR TO CDB Response No. 1: Acknowledged. Comment No. 2: Page 1 Title Sheet of Civil Plan -- Change general note 17 to read "The 2 required Fire Department Connections (FDC) shall be at least 15' from building and located no closer than 25 feet and no further than 50 feet from the nearest Fire Hydrant Assembly (FHA)." PRIOR TO CDB Response No. 2: See revised civil plans. Comment No. 3: Page 10A Civil Plan — Add 2nd FDC at south end of building. Show 25' to 50' separation. Show on plan PRIOR TO CDB Response No. 3: See revised civil plans. Comment No. 4: Civil and Architectural drawings show SE stair opening into traffic lane. Redesign to show exiting out front side to avoid this. Show on all pages PRIOR TO CDB. Response No. 4: All plans have been revised to reflect this redesign. Comment No. 5: Page 10A - Move FDC south to meet the requirement of 25' to 50' separation from hydrant. Show on Plan PRIOR TO CDB Response No.5: See revised civil plans. Comment No. 6: This building is determined to meet the criteria of a High Rise Building as defined by the Florida Fire Prevention Code. 2004 Edition. Therefore the requirements of a High Rise structure must be met. These requirements include,. but are not limited to Fire Code items such as: Fire Pump and generator if pump is electric, sprinkler system throughout with control valve and water flow device on each floor, Class I Standpipe System, Fire Alarm using voice /alarm communication, Central Fire Control Station, firefighter phone system, Emergency lighting, and Standby Power as per NFPA 70, Pressurized Stairwells, Stairwell marking and Elevator Lobbies. Please acknowledge PRIOR TO CDB. ORIGINAL RECEIVED DEC 13 2007 3 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OP CI:PAMAA Nt;R Response No. 6: See revised plans. The building is a High Rise Building as defined by the Florida Fire Prevention Code, 2004 Edition, and all requirements for such a structure must be met. Such requirements include: Fire Pump and Generator (if pump is electric), sprinkler system with control valve and water flow device on each floor, Class 1 Standpipe System, Fire Alarm using voice alarm communication, central Fire Control Station, firefighter phone system, emergency lighting, and standby power as per NFPA 70, Pressurized Stairwells, Stairwell marking and Elevator Lobbies. Comment No. 7: Page 3 Civil Plan shows Fire Dept Emergency Access on city property. This will not be allowed. It must be on private property. Change PRIOR TO CDB. Response No. 7: This comment was removed from the plans. See revised civil plans (Sheet 10A). Comment No. 8: Page 7 of the application states that Fire Flow calcs are included. None attached. Provide Fire Flow Calculations / Water Study by a FIRE PROTECTION ENGINEER to assure an adequate water supply is available and to determine if any upgrades are required by the developer due to the impact of this project. Calculations / Water Study due PRIOR TO CDB. Response No. 8: See attached fire flow calculation worksheet. Comment No. 9: Show location of emergency generator on both sets of plans. PRIOR TO CDB Response No. 9: See revised Civil plans (Sheets 5 and 9) Comment No. 10: Show location of Fire Command room on both Civil and Architectural drawings. Must be above flood plane with access from outside the building or are accessible by way of a smoke proof enclosure. Show on plan plans PRIOR TO CDB. Response No. 10: See Civil plans (Sheets 4 and 9) Comment No. 11: Civil Plan — Provide a page that shows that furthest point of travel to rear of building from Fire Dept Vehicle staging areas can be reached within 450' or provide an emergency access road on property that meets Florida Fire Prevention Code requirements of 24' width with the leading edge no closer than 10' from building. Provide PRIOR TO CDB ORIGINAL RECEIVED 4 DEC 13 2007. PLANNING DEPARTMENT CfEI "I tf- C..rO ,AFTER 0 0 Response No. 11: See revised civil plans (Sheet 10.A). Comment No. 12: Must Comply with Ordinance No. 7617 -06 Radio System Regulations for buildings, install 911 Radio Repeater / Antenna Booster System Acknowledge PRIOR to CDB Response No. 12: Acknowledged by specific note 11, on Sheet 10.A. HARBOR MASTER: No Issues. LEGAL: No Issues. LAND RESOURCES: No Issues. LANDSCAPING: Comment No. 1: Sheets L -1 and L -2 — Crushed coquina shell is proposed on the west and north sides of the building. Section 3- 1204.6 states "All landscaped areas must be covered with shrubs, ground cover, turf, three inches of organic mulch or other suitable material which permits percolation. Where mulch is used, it must be protected from washing out of the planting bed. Inorganic mulch, such as gravel or rock, should only be used where washouts occur. Plastic sheets shall not be installed under mulches." Provide justification for shell or revise to provide ground cover, turf, organic mulch, etc. Also, location of shell on west side is inconsistently indicated between Sheets L -1 and L -2. Response No. 1: The crushed coquina shell has been eliminated and replaced with turf along the west side of the building. The north side of the building has been planted with groundcover and organic mulch. See revised Sheets L1 and L2. Comment No. 2: Sheet L -2 — Within the waterfront visibility triangle (northwest and southwest corners of the property), there can be no landscaping (other than turf or groundcover), per Section 3- 904.6. Revise. Response No. 2: See revised Sheet L2. The proposed landscaping within the waterfront visibility triangle has been revised to conform to Section 3- 904.6. ORIGINAL RECEIVED 5 DEC 13 2007, PLANNING DPARTMENT Comment No. 3: Sheet L -2 — Silver buttonwood must be a minimum caliper of 2" at time of planting. Revise. Response No. 3: The proposed Silver buttonwoods. were changed to 2" minimum caliper, which are shown on the schedule. See revised Sheet L2. PARKS AND RECREATION: Comment No. 1: The Public Art and Design Impact Fee is due and payable on this project prior to issuance of building permit. This fee could be substantial and it is recommended that you contact Chris Hubbard at 727 - 562 -4837 to calculate the assessment. Response No. 1: Acknowledged. Comment No. 2: Open space /recreation impact fees are due prior to issuance of building permits or final plat (if applicable) whichever occurs first. These fees could be substantial and it is recommended that you contact Art Kader at 727- 562 -4824 to calculate the assessment. Response No. 2: Acknowledged. STORMWATER: The following shall be addressed prior to issuance of building permit. Comment No. 1: Provide a SWFWMD permit or letter of exemption. Response No. 1: The applicant acknowledges that it will be necessary to obtain a revised SWFWMD permit based on the proposed modifications. Comment No. 2: Route all roof runoff to the vault. Response No. 2: Acknowledged. See Note 7 on Civil Plans Sheet 7. Comment No. 3: Show type, size, and slope of drainage system located on the garage floors and around the site yard drain. Response No. 3: See Civil Plans Sheet 11. Comment No. 4: Show side swales and their cross sections. Response No. 4: See Civil Plans Sheet 11. ORIGINAL. RECEIVED 6 DEC 13 2007 PLANNING DFP ,ARTMENf Comment No. 5: Show proposed grade elevations through out the site. Response No.5: See revised civil plans. A detailed grading plan will be provided prior to building permit. Comment No. 6: Provide an operational and maintenance schedule of the vault. Response No. 6: Acknowledged, an operational and maintenance schedule will be provided prior to building permit. General note: 1. DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. Response: Acknowledged 2. At building permit application, applicant shall submit all data again for review. Response: Acknowledged SOLID WASTE: Comment No. 1: Please explain how Solid Waste will be serviced. Response No. 1: Trash bins will be stored in a trash holding room on the ground floor as noted on the Civil Plans sheet 3, Architectural Plans A2.101. The bins will be filled by a trash chute to be located near the service elevator. Property maintenance staff will move the bins back and forth from the trash holding room to the trash chute for filling and /or storage. On designated trash pick -up days, the staff will roll the bins to the outdoor staging area for pick up. Applicant acknowledges City of Clearwater solid waste service is available 6 days a week and will schedule trash pick up according to need. TRAFFIC ENGINEERING: Comment No. 1: Number all the parking spaces for easier identification. Response No. 1: See civil sheets 3, 4 and 5. Comment No. 2: How does the gate operate? Show gate console on the site plan. ORIGINAL RECErVED 7 DEC 13 2007 PLANNI&r:P DI rA.P .IFNT CIT of ' GCE .4 '�4 Response No. 2: The gate in the parking garage has been eliminated on Sheet 3 of civil plans. Comment No. 3: Handicapped aisle nearest a valet parking space does not comply to ADA standards. User is compelled to walk or wheel behind a parked car. Response No. 3: All plans have been revised to reconfigure handicap spaces to comply with ADA standards. See Plans sheets A2.101, civil sheets 3,7,10 and 10A. Comment No. 4: On the handicapped parking sign detail change the F.S. number to "318.18 ". Response No. 4: Modified as noted on sign detail sheet 11. Comment No. 5: Design the parking garage from bi- directional vehicular flow to a one -way flow to prevent motorists /Tom encroaching onto opposing path when making 90 degree turns. Response No.5: The vehicular flow has been modified to show one -way traffic where possible, minimizing bi- directional travel. Please see Civil Sheets 3, 4 and 5, revised and plans A2.101, 102, and 103. Comment No. 6: Show where mirrors will be installed to aid motorists. Response No. 6: Please see diagram on Civil Sheets 3, 4 & 5, architectural plans A2.101, 102, and 103. Comment No. 7: Show where blower fans will be installed to expel carbon monoxide and other gases. Blowers shall not encroach on any parking stall dimensions. Response No. 7: The Garage meets the requirements specified in Florida Building Code 406.3 Open parking garages. It is currently planned as a fully sprinklered, naturally ventilated garage. If any fans are determined to be required, they will be located as to not impact the required clearances for any drive aisle, parking space or walkway. Comment No. 8: Show 20' x 20' sight visibility triangles at the driveway. There shall be no objects in the sight triangle over the City's acceptable vertical height criteria. (City's Community Development Code, Section 3 -904). Response No. 8: As a result of the modification of the entrance driveways to one - way the widths of the driveways have been reduced. As such ORIGINAL 8 RECEIVED F.", ' 3 2007 0 0 the columns are no longer located within the visibility triangles. See revised Civil plans sheet 3. Comment. No. 9: Install vertical height clearance warning signs where necessary. Response No. 9: Acknowledged. Proposed warning signs will be shown on construction plans. Comment No. 10: Provide minimum vertical clearance of 114" at accessible passenger loading zones per Florida Building Code Chapter 11 Section 11- 4.6.5. Response No. 10: See Note on civil plans (Sheet 3) and A2.101. There is 120 feet height clearance throughout first level of garage. The drop off lane at the entry of the hotel has a 16' -0" vertical clearance. Comment No. 11: All handicap spaces be provided with wheel stops to protect required signage and to prevent encroachment into accessible path. Response No. 11: Acknowledged. All plans have been revised to reconfigure handicap spaces to comply with ADA standards. See civil plans (sheets 3, 4, & 5). Comment No. 12: Handicap walk aisles shall be five feet in width and shall not have columns obstructing the aisle. Some of the aisles are not five feet in width and are obstructed by columns. Response No. 12: Acknowledged. See revised Civil plans Sheet 3. Comment No. 13: Show on the plan an accessible path from the lobby on the front of the building to the public sidewalk in accordance with the Florida Accessibility Code for Building Construction Sec. 11- 4.1.2(1). Response No. 13: The accessible path is now shown on Civil Plans Sheets 3 & 7 and A2.101. The above to be addressed prior to Community Development Board (CDB). General Note(s): 1. Applicant shall comply with the current Transportation Impact Fee Ordinance and fee schedule and paid prior to a Certificate of Occupancy (C.O.). ORIGINAL RECEND 9 DFr 13 2007 Mv Response: Acknowledged. 2. DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. Response: Acknowledged. PLANNING: Comment No. 1: Sheet 3/13 — Show on the site plan the location and setback from the property lines of the exterior of the building structure for the timeshare floors, the balconies and the eaves. Setbacks apply to all structures, whether at grade or in the air. Reality is that the setbacks indicated are inaccurate. Show actual setbacks. Balconies and eaves can only encroach into required setbacks in accordance with the provisions of Section 3 -908. Response No. 1: The Architectural plans have been revised to show the property boundaries and the CCCL on all plan sheets, including measurements of the setbacks, for the ease of the reviewer. In some instances, balconies, canopies, eaves and other projections encroach into the permitted or requested setbacks in accordance with the provisions of Section 3 -908 and have been noted as such. Comment No. 2: J Stairs on the south side of the building exit to a sidewalk. Does the Building /Fire Codes allow for the route of travel from this stairwell to go the west and around the building to the north side of the building. Otherwise, if they had to travel east from this stairwell, it appears blocked by the wall around the trash staging /loading area and the gates. Advise /revise. Response No. 2: See revised plans which show accessible hardware for entry to trash staging area. Comment No. 3: f Sidewalk on the northwest corner of the building is designed seaward of the CCCL. Unclear why this structure cannot be designed to at least be at a zero setback to the CCCL. Advise /revise. Response No. 3: The proposed sidewalk has been relocated to eliminate the encroachment across the CCCL except at one location for the purpose of providing access to the public beach. ORIGINAL RECEIVED 10 DEC 13 2007, PLANNING DFPARtMENT Comment No. 4: Request must include a reduction to the rear setback from the CCCL from 20 feet to zero feet (to sidewalk). Response No. 4: Acknowledged. Comment No. 5: Sheet 3/13 - Plan indicates proposed building setback at the northeast comer is 14.75 feet. Reality is that, based on floor plans, there is floor area (Levels 4 - 16) and Level 3 parking garage floor above that encroach into the required 15 -foot front setback. In conjunction with other Planning comments, show actual setback from the front property line to the structure (Levels 4 - 16 projected onto the site with proposed setback dimensions). As a 16 -floor building, unclear why a minimum 15 -foot setback cannot be met. Advise /revise. Response No.5: The plans were modified to maintain the 15' minimum front setback on all levels. Encroachment of any projections such as roof overhangs; eaves and canopies on higher levels are in accordance with Section 3 -908. Comment No. 6: Sheet 3/13 — Provide a dimension from the south property line to the trash staging /loading area. Response No. 6: See Sheet 3/13. The dimension is zero feet to pavement and has been included in the applicant's request. Comment No. 7:J Revise Description of Request — a. Termination — Based on 1.87 acres and a maximum density of 50 rooms per acre; my calculator indicates a maximum of 93 rooms are permitted by the current zoning and land use. Response No. 7: Noted. Please see revised Exhibit "B" to application. Comment No. 8: Sheet L -1 — Section 3- 804.C.1 and Section 3-904.B. only permits a maximum of a three -foot high non - opaque fence within the required setback for waterfront property (which this is) and within waterfront visibility triangles. Revise proposed 4 - 6 foot high fences to a maximum three feet height along the west top of seawall and the southwest and northwest comers of the property. Fence along seawall is also seaward of the CCCL and will require State approval. Response No. 8: The fence location has been revised to comply with waterfront visibility triangles. We understand the proposed fence requires DEP approval prior to construction and will apply for such permit prior to building permit. ORIGINAL RECEIVED 11 DEC 13 2007 PLANNING DFRAPTNIEW • s Comment No. 9: f Sheet 3/13 — Revise parking counts in the bottom right corner: a. there are 12 valet spaces; b. there are three taxi spaces; and c. there are only 98 standard spaces. Response No. 9: All plans have been revised to reflect the correct parking counts. The number of parking spaces has been reduced due to (i) the redesign of the parking garage to primarily one -way flow, (ii) the modification of handicap parking spaces, and (iii) addition of fire command room. Comment No. 10: Sheet A2.101 — Revise parking counts for Level 1 in the bottom right corner: a. there are three taxi spaces; and b. there are only 98 standard spaces. Revise parking counts for Project Total in the bottom right corner: a. there are three taxi spaces; and b. there are only 355 standard spaces. Response No. 10: All plans have been revised to reflect the correct parking counts. The number of parking spaces has been reduced due to (i) the redesign of the parking garage to primarily one -way flow, (ii) the modification of handicap parking spaces, and (iii) addition of fire command room. Comment No. 11: J Sheet 3/13 — Note at bottom of sheet states "refer to architect's drawing for details regarding compactor." What compactor? Where? Architect's plans don't have any details. Response No. 11: This note was deleted. There are no plans for a compactor. Comment No. 12: J Sheets 3/13 and A2.101 — How does trash get into the trash holding room on the first floor? I don't see any doors on the inside of the building for hotel personnel to get into the room to dump the trash into dumpsters, nor any door on the outside of the building to roll the dumpsters out to the street on pickup day. Response No. 12: Please see the response to Solid Waste Comment No. 1 on Page 7 of this response and the revised plans. Doors have been added to the Trash Holding room from the parking garage RIGI RECEIVED 12 DFC 1.3 2007 Level 1. Trash will be moved vertically in the building by a trash chute, collected in containers in a first floor trash room and rolled to the trash holding room. There is a roll up door adjacent to the service drive for rolling containers out for trash pickup. Comment No. 13: J Sheets 3/13, 4/13 and 5/13 — Must indicate the spaces in front of the rear valet parking as also valet parking (total of 12 valet spaces on Level 1, 24 on Level 2 and 12 on Level 3). Response No. 13: Please see revised civil plans sheets 3, 4, & 5 and architectural plans A2.101, 102 & 103. Comment No. 14:1 Sheet 3/13 — Dimension the width of the drop off drive aisle and the width of all driveways. Response No. 14: All dimensions are noted on the plans. Comment No. 15: J Sheet 1/13 —Revise Land Use Data Note #8 for Parking: a. Total Parking Spaces column — Revise Level 2 to 142; Revise Total to 415; b. Standard Parking Spaces column — Revise Level 1 to 98; Revise Level 2 to 118; Revise Level 3 to 139; Revise Total to 355; c. Valet Parking Spaces column - Revise Level 1 to 12; Revise Level 2 to 24; Revise Level 3 to 12; Revise Total to 48; and d. Add new Taxi Parking Spaces column with 3 on Level 1; zero on Levels 2 and 3; 3 Total. Response No. 15: Land Use Data Note #8 has been revised to reflect the correct parking counts. The number of parking spaces has been reduced due to (i) the redesign of the parking garage to primarily one -way flow, (ii) the modification of handicap parking spaces, and (iii) addition of fire command room. Comment No. 16: f Sheet 1/13 — Revise Land Use Data for Parking — Proposed to 415. Response No. 16: The Land Use Data has been updated to reflect the revised parking counts. Comment No. 17: J Sheet A2.104 — This floor shows various areas with square footage amounts, yet they are undefined as to use. Appears applicant is undecided as to the proposed use of this floor. ORIGINAL. RECEIVED 13 DEC 13 2007 Explain. Alternately, with so much of this floor undefined as to use, it would appear that this floor could have been designed with units on this floor allowing the building to be reduced in height and /or allowing a slightly different building shape due to reconfiguration of units. Response No. 17: All floor areas are essential to the proposed transient use. The plans have been revised to label these areas. See revised / sheet A2.104. Comment No. 18: �/ Sheet A2.111 — At the bottom of the floor plan drawing, revise Level 10 to Level 11. Response No. 18: See revised Sheet A2.111. Comment No. 19: Sheet A2.112 — Revise title block on right side of sheet to indicate Level 12 (not 112). Response No. 19: See revised Sheet A2.112. Comment No. 20: f Sheets A2.113 and A2.114 — Building support "room" between Units 1 and 2 needs walls on north side of building and along hallway. Response No. 20: / See revised Sheets A2.113 and A2.114. Comment No. 21: J Sheet 1/13 — Land Use Data — Cannot find in the table where Notes [4] and [5] are referred to (except at the bottom of the table; but where above ?). Revise. Response No. 21: See revised Land Use Data table. Comment No. 22: Sheet 1/13 — Land Use Data — Based on other Planning comments, revise all proposed setbacks. Those indicated on this sheet are inaccurate or are not specific as to what the proposed setback is for. Reminder — Per Section 3- 905.A requires setbacks to be measured to all structures from the CCCL. Response No. 22: The architectural plans- have been revised to show the property boundaries and the CCCL on all plan sheets, including dimensions to setbacks, for the ease of the reviewer. In some instances, balconies, canopies, eaves and other projections encroach into the permitted or requested setbacks in accordance with the provisions of Section 3 -908 and have been noted as such. ORIGINAL RECEIVED 14 DEC 13 2007 s • Comment No. 23: Sheets 3/13,4/13, 5/15, A2.101, A2.102 and A2.103 — On Parking Levels 1, 2 and 3, there are many parking spaces adjacent to solid walls for rooms, stairwells, etc., that block the view of motorists when backing out (backing out blind into the drive aisle). Need to provide mirrors or other devices at all of these spaces to aid motorists. Show on plans the locations of such mirrors or other devices. Response No. 23: Mirrors will be installed as necessary. See Civil Sheets 3 to 5, Architectural plans A2.101, 102, & 103. Comment No. 24: J Sheets 3/13 and A2.101 — It would seem, especially due to the location of the handicap parking spaces, that there would be at least one door from the parking side (handicap accessible path) into the lobby. Response No. 24: See revised plans showing door. Comment No. 25: J Sheets 3/13 and A2.101 — It appears that some level of security of the parking areas on Level 1 are desired, as evidenced by the lift gates at both driveway entrances. However, there doesn't appear to be walls to restrict such access perpendicular to the south end of the northern lift gate to the stairwell, between the columns west of the taxi parking space and south of the lobby around the three parking over to the stairwell. Revise. Response No. 25: These gates were eliminated. J Comment No. 26: Sheet A2.101 — Show the northern and southern lift gates at the driveway entrances to the parking garage. Response No. 26: These gates were eliminated. Comment No. 27: Sheet 3/13 — Note #2 at bottom of page — Rather than header curb, do you mean straight curb, as shown in the detail on Sheet 11/13') Show curbing on both sides of all three driveways on Sheets 3/13,7/13 and L -1. Response No. 27: See revised Sheets 3/13, 7/13 and L -1. Comment No. 28: Sheets 3/13 and A2.101 — There should be at least one door into the service room within the lobby area. Response No. 28: See revised plans showing door. Comment No. 29: Sheets 3/13, A2.101, A2.102 and A2.103 — Two columns on southern most end of parking rows south ofoRAp RECEIVED 15 DEC 13 2007, (northeast of southwestern stairwell) encroach into the. required 24 -foot wide north /south drive aisle. Revise. Response No. 29: Plans have been revised. Comment No. 30: J Levels 1, 2 and 3 indicate valet parking is being provided (only 48 spaces out of a total of 415 spaces, or 11.6 percent of the total number of spaces). Provide more specifics of valet parking, such as location of valet drop off and delivery to customers and the operational aspects of the proposed valet parking. Response No. 30: Property operator will establish parking policies. Guests will be given the option of valet parking. Those wanting to self -park will / be given directions. Comment No. 31:J Sheet 3113 — Legend on right hand side — SB is not used on the drawing, only in the legend. Revise. Response No. 31: Deleted "SB" Comment No. 32: J Sheet 3/13 — Note #6 on right hand side — Case FLD2005 -01 005 is not applicable once this case is approved by the CDB. Revise language. Response No. 32: / Reference to Case FLD2005 -01 -005 has been deleted. Comment No. 33: J Sheet 4/13 — Provide a door into the Fire Pump Room and label the "service" room west of the bank of four elevators. Response No. 33: See revised civil plans. Comment No. 34: V Sheet 5/13 — a. Label the "service" room west of the bank of four elevators; b. Revise label for "transformer" to "transformer below "; and c. Revise "open to below" on east side to "building support" (see Sheet A2.1 03) and provide doors into this room (show on both Sheets 5/13 and A2.1 03). Response No. 34: Revised accordingly. See civil plans sheet 5 and Architectural plans A2 -103 & 105. Comment No. 35: J Sheet 7/13 — Relocate arrow at bottom of drawing for yard drain so that it actually points to a yard drain. Add "(typ)" after words "yard drain ". ORIGINAL RECEIVED 16 DEC 13 2007, PLA,NNIMr, M— PAra?I EW Response No. 35: Revised. Comment No. 36: Sheet 7/13 — Provide existing and proposed grade elevations throughout the site now, so that one can see how the landscaping is working with site drainage. Response No. 36: See revised plans. Comment No. 37: J Sheets A2.1 05 thru A2.114 — Columns are shown west of the building that should be removed from the plans, as they do not hold up anything: a. Level 5 — west of units 6/7 and 17/18; b. Levels 6 -9 — west of units 6/7 and 20/21; c. Level 10 — west of units 6/7 and 19120; d. Level 11 — west of units 6/7 and 18; e. Level 12 — west of units 6/7; f. Level 13 — west of units 4/5; and g. Levels 14 -16 — west of unit 4. Response No. 37: Plans have been revised in indicate applicable columns only. Comment No. 38: Sheets A2.105 thru A2.114 — Provide the square footage of the units. Response No. 38: See revised sheets A2.105 thru A2.114 Comment No. 39: J Sheet A2.104 — Show the column projections on the south side of the building, similar to the north side of the building (see building elevations). Response No.39: The plans have been revised to reflect this accurately. Comment No. 40: Sheets A2.105 thru A2.114 — Levels 5 -16 — Dimension the distance the walls of the units project out from the columns, as well as balconies. This relates to setbacks and how close the building actually is to property lines, which is inaccurately indicated on the site plan. Response No. 40: Property line and CCCL lines are now indicated on these levels with setback dimension indicated. Comment No. 41: .f Sheet A2.105 — There appears to be exterior walls missing in three locations and it is unclear of the intended use of these rooms once the exterior walls are shown: a. west of unit 5; b. north of unit 12; and c. west of unit 19. 17 ORIGINAL RECEIVED DEC 13 2007 PLANNING DEPARTMENT a��y. riX Cis c�p�M,gTER Response No. 41: • Plans have been revised. • Comment No. 42: J Sheet A2.106 — There appears to be exterior walls missing in three locations and it is unclear of the intended use of these rooms once the exterior walls are shown: a. west of unit 5; b. north of unit 12; and c. west of unit 22. Response No. 42: Plans have been revised. Comment No. 43: J Sheet A2.110 — There appears to be exterior walls missing in three locations and it is unclear of the intended use of these rooms once the exterior walls .are shown: a. west of unit 5; b. north of unit 12; and c. west of unit 21. Response No. 43: Plans have been revised. Comment No. 44: J Sheet A2.111 — There appears to be exterior walls missing in three locations and it is unclear of the intended use of these rooms once the exterior walls are shown: a. west of unit 5; b. north of unit 12; and C. west of unit 19. Response No. 44: Plans have been revised. Comment No. 45: J Sheet A2.112 — There appears to be an exterior wall missing west of unit 5 and it is unclear of the intended use of this room once the exterior wall is shown. Response No. 45: Plans have been revised. Comment No. 46: Provide all four building elevations that are not colored, that do not have landscaping that hides the building features and does not have any sun shade lines and shading. On the elevations indicate the exterior building material and color. May use a legend indicating such material and color, with numbers on the building corresponding to the legend. You may still include the colored elevations with your submittal package, but there is too much "extra" stuff on the elevations that hides ORIGINAL RECEIVED IF DFr 13 2007 0 0 information and makes reviewing the elevations difficult to read. Response No. 46: Revised elevations included. Comment No. 47: V On the building elevations, provide the words "Level 1" through "Level 16" out at the dimension lines. Response No. 47: See revised elevations as requested. Comment No. 48: ✓ On the building elevations, explain the significance of the 1' -8" dimension above the FEMA line, as it is unclear what this is dimensioning. Response No. 48: Level lines are shown on vertical plan. This shows the distance between FEMA line and the second floor. Comment No. 49: f Understanding there is a requirement under Beach by Design to have at least 60% of any elevation covered by windows or architectural decoration, provide the actual calculated percentage for each elevation (general statement on elevations that they exceed this 60% is insufficient). Response No. 49: See the revised response to Comprehensive Infill Criteria 6 in Exhibit "B" to the application. Comment No. 50: / Provide a roof plan. Response No. 50: Included — see Sheet A2.117. Comment No. 51: 1 North Elevation — 150 -foot height dimension is indicated to the top of roof slab. The elevation indicates there apparently is intended to have a 42 -inch parapet, which is not drawn on the elevation. Revise. Response No. 51: The North elevation has been revised to reflect the 42 -inch parapet. Comment No. 52: Definition of building height limits projections above the top of the flat roof to 16 feet for elevators, stairs and mechanical equipment rooms. North Elevation indicates this maximum height limitation, but it appears that gable roofed projections (have no idea what they are for) are higher than 16 feet. South Elevation actually dimensioned such as 16' -8" on the lower portion of the building. Revise. Response No. 52: The beginning point for the dimension line is 8" below the maximum height on the lower tower portion of the building. The roof projections, all which house equipment, will not excS1,gJA6' RECENED 19 ncr , ol ?001 per the definition for Height, Building or structure in Beach by Design which states: "(3) Elevator equipment rooms and like mechanical equipment enclosures shall be permitted to project up to 16 feet higher than the maximum height specified for the zoning district in which the building is located." Comment No. 53: J There are projections above the maximum building height of 100 feet and 150 feet that are neither parapets, elevator towers, stair towers or mechanical equipment rooms. Based on recent legal interpretations from our Legal Department, unless the Code specifically provides a means of requesting such additional height (which 1 am not aware of), then such structures must be removed from the design /drawing. Response No. 53: See revised Architectural plans A2.117. There are no projections which are neither parapets, elevator towers, stair towers or mechanical equipment rooms. All elements have been labeled on the plans. Comment No. 54: Site Plan (Sheet 3/13), floor plans and building elevations — It would be extremely helpful to have north /south and east/west station points /lines set up through the building (such as at columns) with dimensions to better indicate and allow review of the actual location of structures, especially in relation to required setbacks and allowable projections into required setbacks. Response No. 54: The property lines and setbacks are shown on all floors of the architectural plans. Comment No. 55: Floor plans and building elevations — Provide dimensions indicating the distance balconies and roof eaves project from the face of the building. Response No. 55: See response to Planning Comment 1 on Page 9 of this response document. Comment No. 56: North and South Elevations — Facade at the amenity Level 4 is indicated as basically flat on the floor plan Sheet A2.104, yet the elevation appears to indicate similar fluctuation of the facade as floors above. Correlate Sheet A2.104 and the building elevations. Response No. 56: See revised plans. Comment No. 57: J East and West Elevations — There decorative roof structures on 20 appears some type of the easternmost and ORIGINAL RECEIVED DFr '. 3 7007 0 0 westernmost portions of the building that are not indicated on the floor plans. Revise. Response No. 57: See revised plans. Comment No. 58: �J East,Elevation — There appears to be some trees proposed on the roof of the amenity level (Level 5) not indicated on the landscape plans. Unclear how these trees would be accessed to provide necessary maintenance. Revise. Response No. 58: Level 5 landscaping has been added to plans. See revised Sheets LP1, LP2, IR2. Access is available through the Level 5 units. Comment No. 59: East Elevation — Vehicular entrances into the building do not read as discernable building entrances. Response No. 59: Landscaping and roadway marking and paving will provide discernable building entrances. Comment No. 60: ,( Swimming Pool — Landscape plans appear to indicate the edge of pool and pool deck is elevated above the normal amenity floor slab elevation, but how much higher is unclear. It is also unclear of the pool depth and if the pool is sunk below the normal amenity floor slab elevation. If sunk below the normal amenity floor slab, will there be adequate clearance below the pool for vehicle parking on Level 3? Cross - section on Sheet A6.101 does not provide sufficient information to determine such. Provide better information on the cross - section to indicate compliance on Sheet AM 01. Response No. 60: Sheet A6.101 has been revised to show vertical dimensions under the pool. Comment No. 61: Transfer of Development Rights — Submitted warranty deeds will be forwarded to Leslie Dougall -Sides to determine if properly written. If there are issues, will contact you with the issues and how to correct. Response No. 61: We will reply to comments when received. Comment No. 62: J On Page 1 of the application provide the parcel size in square feet. Response No. 62: See revised Page 1 of application. ORIGINAL RECEIVED 21 DEC 13 2007. 0 0 Comment No. 63: Exhibit B - Request "a" - Revise FLD -01005 to FLD2005- 01005. Response No. 63: See Revised Exhibit "B" to application. Comment No. 64: Exhibit B - Revise request to include those other reductions or increases indicated through other Planning Department comments. Response No. 64: See Revised Exhibit "B" to application. Comment No. 65:1 Response to General Applicability criteria # 1 - North - Revise" 10' -wide shell sidewalk" to "10' -wide shell finish concrete sidewalk ". Response No. 65: See Revised Exhibit "B" to application. Comment No. 66: j Response to General Applicability criteria #1 - East -In relation to scale of buildings, unclear of how the three -story "base" actually continues the scale of buildings to the east when, rising above this "base ", is a total 150 -foot tall building. Advise /revise. Response No. 66: See Revised Exhibit "B" to application. Comment No. 67: f Response to General Applicability criteria #2 - 1) It can be argued that the "tiered" effect is on a south to north coordinate and there is little or no tiering east to west; and 2) Excess parking is being provided due to the nature of the use that can be characterized closer to a residential use due to the size of the units. None of this excess parking is proposed for public use. This is also a timeshare /interval ownership type of overnight accommodation use, where parking for accessory restaurants and convention space at a hotel could become a problem, but not in this circumstance. Parking is being provided based on need and the type of overnight accommodation use. Response No. 67: The revised plans and elevations reflect the tiered effect requested. Please see the revised elevations and the revised Exhibit "B" to the application. The Property operator has requested a parking ratio of 1.75 spaces per room and it is is RECEIVED 22 nl :r° 1 17007' n � P L • anticipated that all of the parking area will serve the proposed use. Comment No. 68: d Response to General Applicability criteria #3 — First paragraph /first sentence — Revise "10' -wide shell sidewalk" to "10' -wide shell finish concrete sidewalk ". Response No. 68: See Revised Exhibit "B" to application. Comment No. 69: J Response to General Applicability criteria #4 — Revise: 1) The entrances to the parking garage do not have 150 feet of stacking space. There is only approximately 45 feet from the front property line to the garage door. There is no requirement or directed design of the garage accesses where such stacking can be claimed. However, there is a drop -off area in front that you can talk about in relation to minimizing traffic congestion. It is unclear once someone is dropped off of how the driver maneuvers the vehicle into the garage through the gate, as it is unknown how the gate is operated by valet personnel as well as general guests that don't desire valet service. Where are any key pads for such operation (both driveways)? If a key pad, direction of traffic flow at the drop -off area would appear to be a problem. Need to think this through a little better. Gates have been eliminated. See Revised Exhibit "B" to application for discussion and civil plan Sheets 3, 4 & 5. The circulation pattern allows vehicles to circle around to the drop off area without re- entering the public street. There are options for travel within the garage (relieving congestion) and two lanes of stacking space at the drop off area to relieve congestion. 2) Traffic congestion in the garage is a function of the design and is a private matter. The criteria is relating to traffic congestion on public streets related to this development. The greater amount of parking provided is a function of the type of overnight accommodation use (timeshare /interval ownership). Due to gates at the garage entrances, the number of parking spaces is not a direct correlation to congestion. See Revised Exhibit "B" to application. The gates have been eliminated from the plans. The expectation is that the resort 23 ORIGINAL RECEIVED 1, • • is a destination and once visitors are parked, will walk or take public transportation to local shops and restaurants. 3) The three taxi spaces designed may create traffic congestion at the northern garage entrance, which is the first entrance to the site guests would try to use. The taxis have to get into and out of the spaces and they must back into the drive access to the garage. Getting in and out can create backups of guests trying to get in to the site. May want to rethink taxi parking spaces. These will be clearly labeled as taxi spaces only with signage. With the one -way entry drive shifted to south, more of a buffer is allowed between the drive and these spaces to minimize congestion. See Revised Exhibit "B" to application. 4) As to the potential for delivery vehicles at the "loading area ", either the delivery truck will need to back in to the loading zone from S. Gulfview Blvd. or will need to back out into the roadway, which in either case could cause traffic congestion on S. Gulfview Blvd. You are correct that, since loading areas are not required in the Tourist District by Code, having an on -site loading area will provide an area where the truck can sit and not block the travel lanes of S. Gulfview Blvd. Due to the proposed use, small delivery trucks which can enter the parking garage or use the drop off lane will handle the majority of deliveries. Only occasional use of the "loading area" is required. Response No. 69: See revised Exhibit "B" to application. Comment No. 70: Response to General Applicability criteria #5 — Revise in the second paragraph, last line, "10' -wide shell sidewalk" to "10' -wide shell finish concrete sidewalk." Response No. 70: Noted. See revised Exhibit "B" to application. Comment No. 71: Response to Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria #1 — Setbacks — Once the actual building is shown on the site plan where the upper levels project farther than that presently indicated on the submitted site plan and the actual setbacks are indicated, then rethink how to address this criteria. Required setbacks are less than presently ORIGINAL RECEIVED 24 • r indicated. See other Planning comments about the size and bulk of the building in relation to required setbacks. Response No. 71: The property lines and- CCCL line are now shown on all plan sheets with the setbacks dimensioned. The building structure, including balconies and terraces, meets applicable setbacks. The roof overhang and associated eaves and canopies at upper levels are in compliance with Section 3 -908. The relief that is sought is not regarding the buildings. See revised Exhibit "B" to application and revised plans. Comment No. 72: Response to Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria #6 Height and Tower Separation - 800 -foot rule - The project at 521 S. Gulfview Blvd (Entrada) to the southeast has been approved on January 18, 2005, under FLD2004- 04025/TDR2004 -09011 (but not yet constructed) to construct a new building on the west side of the existing hotel building at a height of 128 feet, which falls within the 800 -foot dimension. Response No. 72: The project meets Option 1 —the 500' Rule. The diagram depicting the 800' Rule has been omitted from this resubmittal and is not required. Comment No. 73: J Exhibit B - Termination of Nonconforming Status - First paragraph /sentence - Unclear what reference there is to "(162 residential dwelling units)" to remain, as there are no existing residential units and any conversion factors available in the past on other projects is no longer available. Revise. Response No. 73: See revised Exhibit "B" to application. Comment No. 74: Planning staff is still concerned with the mass, scale and bulk of the building. The northern elevation, which has been previously discussed in meetings, (but also can be an issue for the southern portion of the building) still rises as one main structure absent of any tiering effect east to west. Contributing factors to this is the number of terminated units (217 units, where 93 are permitted today), the transfer . of development rights, unit sizes that are residential in scale (with some apparently very large units) and huge amounts of undefined floor area on the amenity Level 4. Additionally, the design where floor area for Levels 4 (or 5) and above projects from the face of the building on Levels 1 -3 reducing building setbacks for a building 99' -4" for the southern portion of the building and 150 feet for the northern portion also creates issues regarding ma®sR�es��cale RECEIVED 25 and bulk of the building, pushing the building closer to property lines and reducing setbacks. Response No. 74: See revised Exhibit "B" to application and plans for Floors 12- 16. The Applicant has reduced unit sizes on the upper levels and defined Level 4 space use to respond to staff concerns. The improved building design provides tiers from east to west on the north fagade. All space shown on the plans is programmed space by the property operator. Other: No Comments. 12/13/2007 11:59 AM 045934.109561 #422346 v1 -Taylor Woodrow /2007 /Responses to Comments ORIGINAL RECEIVED DEC 13 2007 26 PLANNING DEPARTMENT r7l . .Me jt, age � Page 1 of 2 Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2007 6:39 PM To: 'Jayne E. Sears' Cc: Bob Glantz; Chuck Jones; Ed Armstrong; Katie Cole Subject: RE: 430 S. Gulfview - TDRs Jayne - Thank you for the table. I did check the "request" that was listed in the DRC comments, which may differ with what you may have had listed in your exhibit, and the TDR section does match the number of units and the location of the sending sites listed on the table you sent me. The listed request (so far) is: (1) Termination of Status of Nonconformity for density (217 overnight accommodation units; where 93 overnight accommodation units are permitted today), under the provisions of Section 6 -109; (2) Flexible Development approval to permit 230 overnight accommodation units (timeshare /interval ownership) with reductions to the front (east) setback from 15 feet to 14.75 feet (to building) and from 15 feet to zero feet (to trash staging area), reductions to the side (north) setback from 10 feet to 7.3 feet from the Coastal Construction Control Line (CCCL) (to building) and from 10 feet to 3.52 feet (to sidewalk), a reduction to the side (south) setback from 10 feet to three feet (to sidewalk and trash staging area), a reduction to the rear (west) setback from 20 feet to 8.3 feet from the CCCL (to building) and from 20 feet to zero feet (to sidewalk), an increase to building height from 35 feet to 150 feet (to roof deck) and a deviation to allow direct access to an arterial street, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2- 803.C; and (3) including the Transfer of Development Rights of eight total dwelling units (being converted to 13 overnight accommodation units) previously approved under TDR2005- 05022, including four dwelling units from 557 and 579 Cyprus Avenue, one dwelling unit from 625 -627 Bay Esplanade and three dwelling units from 667 Bay Esplanade, under the provisions of Section 4- 1402. Depending on what the revised drawings indicate, obviously the request may change to reflect the new conditions. Wayne - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Jayne E. Sears [mailto:JayneS @jpfirm.com] Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2007 2:13 PM To: Wells, Wayne Cc: Bob Glantz; Chuck Jones; Ed Armstrong; Katie Cole Subject: 430 S. Gulfview = TDRs Wayne, regarding the TDR application, the attached table is a recap of the transfers of development rights to 430 S. Gulfview. My copy of your staff report is correct, but I believe Neil read something differently at the meeting. Please just double -check that your advertising matches the attached info. I will attach this recap sheet to the copies of the TDR application that are being resubmitted. Thanks Wayne. Jayne E. Sears Legal Assistant Johnson, Pope, Bokor, Ruppel & Burns, LLP 911 Chestnut Street Clearwater, FL 33756 12/12/2007 i ;J MA'6ge Page 2 of 2 Phone: (727) 461 -1818 Fax: (727) 462 -0365 12/12/2007 Recap of TDRs to Receiver Site of 430 S. Gulfview #422857 vl - TW /TDR Table • Number of Residential Seller Address of Sender Site Dwelling Units Recording Information Transferred BayEsplanade.com, LLC 625 -627 Bay Esplanade 1 unit O.R.14634/Pg. 305 Paul Kelley and Tracey Kelley 667 Bay Esplanade 3 units O.R. 14606/Pg. 945 Teresa A. Kramer and Maxwell M. 557 Cyprus and 579 Cyprus 4 units O.R. 14826/Pg. 1985 Radford #422857 vl - TW /TDR Table • Message 0 0 Page 1 of 1 Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2007 10:05 AM To: 'Jayne E. Sears' Subject: RE: Dumb question No, I only need one set (the original) signed and sealed. - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Jayne E. Sears [mailto:JayneS @jpfirm.com] Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2007 8:58 AM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: Dumb question After all this time I am never sure of the requirement for signed and sealed plans..... Are all 15 sets of the architect's plans and civil plans supposed to be signed and sealed? Jayne E. Sears Legal Assistant Johnson, Pope, Bokor, Ruppel & Burns, LLP 911 Chestnut Street Clearwater, FL 33756 Phone: (727) 461 -1818 Fax: (727) 462 -0365 12/12/2007 Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2007 1:14 PM To: Jayne Sears (E -mail) Subject: FLD2007- 11034, 430 S. Gulfview Blvd. Jayne - • Finally, attached are draft comments for the DRC meeting tomorrow on the above referenced case, to be heard at 10:05 am. Wayne draft 12.6.07 rc action agend. CITY OF CLEARWATE POST OFFICE BOX 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758 -4748 MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562 -4865 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA COPY November 29, 2007 1440 Group LLC 1001 East Atlantic Avenue Suite 202 Delray Beach, Florida 33483 Attention: Marls Walsh Re: Application for Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment filed by Indigo Beach, L.L.C. (the "Application ") with the City of Clearwater, Florida (the "City ") with respect to 430 South Gulfview Boulevard, Clearwater, Florida ( "Property ") Dear Mr. Walsh: This letter has as its purpose to advise you, in connection with the purchase of the Property by 1440 Group LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, that the sale and transfer of the Property from Indigo Beach, L.L.C. to 1440 Group LLC does not require the consent or approval of the City and all rights and prerogatives of Indigo Beach, L.L.C. under and pursuant to the Application will be absolutely and unconditionally transferred to 1440 Group LLC and said successor -in- interest to the Property may pursue the Application in the place and stead of Indigo Beach, L.L.C. without any adverse consequences whatsoever. The sole requirement of the City in connection with such sale and transfer of the Property is the requirement that 1440 Group LLC amend the Application, as required, to reflect any changes occasioned by such sale and transfer. Also, in the event that substantive changes are made to the Application after the date of such sale and transfer, such changes can impact the current timelines which pertain with respect to the Application. Yours truly, CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA By: chae 1. Del , AICP , Planning Director FRANK HIBBARD, MAYOR JOHN DORAN, COUNCILMEMBER J.B. JOHNSON, COUNCILMEMBER BILL JONSON, COUNCILMEMBER CARLEN A. PETERSEN, COUNCILMEMBER "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER" +� Ntessage . Page 1 of 3 • Wells, Wayne From: Steven A. Williamson [stevew @jpfirm.comj Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2007 1:31 PM To: Delk, Michael Cc: Wells, Wayne; Dougall- Sides, Leslie; Ed Armstrong Subject: RE: Assignment of Application /Taylor Woodrow Understandable. Again, thank you for your quick response and your willingness to fast -track this issue. Steven A. Williamson, Esquire Johnson, Pope, Bokor, Ruppel & Burns, LLP 911 Chestnut Street Clearwater, FL 33756 727 - 461 -1818 (phone) 727 - 441 -8617 (fax) - - - -- Original Message---- - From: michael.delk @MyClearwater.com [ mailto :michael.delk @MyClearwater.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2007 1:30 PM To: Steven A. Williamson Cc: Wayne. We I Is@ myClea rwater. com; Leslie. Dougall- Sides @myClearwater.com Subject: RE: Assignment of Application /Taylor Woodrow Steven - It appears acceptable to me. Nonetheless, I now need to await confirmation from Leslie that she concurs with my position prior to signing this document. Michael L. Delk, AICP Planning Director City of Clearwater, Florida myclearwater.com - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Steven A. Williamson [mailto:stevew @jpfirm.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2007 1:20 PM To: Delk, Michael Cc: Wells, Wayne; Dougall- Sides, Leslie Subject: RE: Assignment of Application/Taylor Woodrow Importance: High Michael, the attorneys for the Buyers are anxious about the assignment issue despite our representation that it is a non issue in the eyes of the City. With that being said, the Buyer's attorneys would like something more formal from the City. They drafted the attached letter, which provides essentially the same information your email provided. Nevertheless, they would like something similar form from you. Please review the attached letter and let me know if you will be comfortable signing something similar on City letterhead. Please feel free to call me if you have questions. If you do not have any issues with the attached language, you can merely fax or email a copy of the letter. I look forward to receiving your response. 11/28/2007 +�'• N`�essage • • Page 2 of 3 Regards, Steven A. Williamson, Esquire Johnson, Pope, Bokor, Ruppel & Burns, LLP 911 Chestnut Street Clearwater, FL 33756 727 - 461 -1818 (phone) 727 - 441 -8617 (fax) - - - -- Original Message---- - From: michael.delk @MyClearwater.com [ mailto :michael.delk @MyClearwater.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2007 4:26 PM To: Steven A. Williamson Cc: Wayne.Wells @myClearwater.com; Leslie. Dougall- Sides @myClearwater.com Subject: RE: Assignment of Application Steven, At your earliest convenience, we would want to get a revised and current application on file reflecting the changes due to assignment. Otherwise, we would continue to process accordingly. Of course, if at some point substantive changes are made in what is being requested, that can impact timelines. Please let me know if additional information is needed. Michael L. Delk, AICP Planning Director City of Clearwater, Florida myclearwater.com - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Steven A. Williamson [mailto:stevew @jpfirm.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2007 4:13 PM To: Delk, Michael Cc: Ed Armstrong Subject: Assignment of Application Importance: High Michael, thank you for calling me back so quickly. Please confirm that the Taylor Woodrow application (Flexible Development Application for Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment) that is currently pending may be assigned to a third -party developer such that the applicant would no longer be Taylor Woodrow but un unrelated entity. Also, please let me know the steps necessary effectuate the assignment. Again, thank you for your quick response. Kind regards, Steven A. Williamson, Esquire Johnson, Pope, Bokor, Ruppel & Burns, LLP 911 Chestnut Street 11/28/2007 s;. Aessage � • Page 3 of 3 Clearwater, FL 33756 727 - 461 -1818 (phone) 727 - 441 -8617 (fax) 11/28/2007 C` N �a PLANNING DEPARTMENT November 5, 2007 C ITY OF C LEARWATE R POST OFFICE BOX 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758 -4748 MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562 -4865 Mr. E. D. Armstrong III, Esquire VIA FAX: 727 -441 -8617 Johnson, Pope, Bokor, Ruppel & Burns, LLP P.O. Box 1368 Clearwater, Florida 33757 -1368 Re: FLD2007 -11034 — 430 S. Gulfview Boulevard — Letter of Completeness Dear Mr. Armstrong: The Planning Department staff has entered your application into the Department's filing system and assigned the case number FLD2007- 11034. After a preliminary review of the submitted documents, staff has determined that the application is complete. The Development Review Committee (DRC) will review the application for sufficiency on Thursday, December 6, 2007, in the Planning Department Conference Room (Room 216); which is located on the second floor of the Municipal Services Building at 100 South Myrtle Avenue. You will be contacted by the Planning Department's Administrative Analyst within one week prior to the meeting date for the approximate time that your case will be reviewed. You or your representative (as applicable) must be present. to answer any questions that the DRC may have regarding your application. Additional comments may be generated by the DRC at the time of the meeting. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at 727 -562 -4504 or wayne. well s «myclearwater.com. Sincerely yours, 'ay n`e We11s, AICP Planner III FRANK HIBBARD, MAYOR JOHN DORAN, COUNCILMEMBER J.B. JOHNSON, COUNCILMEMBER BILL JONSON, COUNCILMEMBER CARLEN A. PETERSEN, COUNCILMEMBER 0 CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT ° earwater 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 U TEL: (727) 562 -4567 FAx: (727) 562 -4865 Date: To: From: Re: Comments: FACSIMILE COVER SHEET November 5, 2007 E.D. Armstrong, (727) 462 -0365 Robert G. Tefft, Planner III FLD2007 -1 1034 1 430 Gulfview Boulevard Number of Pages Including Cover Sheet: 2 ** Please confirm receipt via e -mail at: robert.teffta,myclearwater.com ** ** Visit the Planning Department online at www.inyclearwater.com ** Page 1 of 1 Wells, Wayne From: Delk, Michael Sent: Thursday, May 08, 2008 2:35 PM To: Horne, William Cc: Wells, Wayne Subject: FW: Salt Rock 57 LLC (Ocean Properties) Bill - Per your request. In addition to Wayne's outlined time frames, the code would allow them to request two one - year extensions from me and the CDB respectively. Subject to those being approved, it could add up to two years and extend until January 1.5, 2012. This is our current best available information. Please let me know if any additional information is needed. Michael L. Delk, AICP Planning Director City of Clearwater, Florida myclearwater.com - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Thursday, May 08, 2008 2:21 PM To: Delk, Michael Subject: Salt Rock 57 LLC (Ocean Properties) Michael - Case FLD2007- 11034/TDR2005 -05022 was filed with the Planning Department on November 2, 2007. It was reviewed by the Development Review Committee (DRC) on December 6, 2007, and was deemed sufficient to move forward to the Community Development Board (CDB). Salt Block 57, LLC bought the property on .December 21, 2007, from Indigo Beach, LLC. The CDB approved the application on January 15, 2008, with 15 conditions of approval. Part of their request the CDB approved, embodied in Condition #1, was a two -year time frame to submit a building permit application to construct the improvements (January 15, 2010), unless time extensions are granted pursuant to Section 4 -407. Their request for the two -year time frame was due to market conditions. My recollection at the CDB meeting was that Ed Armstrong indicated they hoped to move forward more quickly than the time frame requested. There has been no building permit application submitted to -date for the construction of the proposed improvements. Wayne 5/8/2008 - Page 1 of 2 Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Thursday, May 08, 2008 2:21 PM To: Delk, Michael Subject: Salt Rock 57 LLC (Ocean Properties) Michael - Case FLD2007- 11034/TDR2005 -05022 was filed with the Planning Department on November 2, 2007. It was reviewed by the Development Review Committee (DRC) on December 6, 2007, and was deemed sufficient to move forward to the Community Development Board (CDB). Salt Block 57, LLC bought the property on December 21, 2007, from Indigo Beach, LLC. The CDB approved the application on January 15, 2008, with 15 conditions of approval. Part of their request the CDB approved, embodied in Condition #1, was a two -year time frame to submit a building permit application to construct the improvements (January 15, 2010), unless time extensions are granted pursuant to Section 4 -407. Their request for the two -year time frame was due to market conditions. My recollection at the CDB meeting was that Ed Armstrong indicated they hoped to move forward more quickly than the time frame requested. There has been no building permit application submitted to -date for the construction of the proposed improvements. Wayne - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Delk, Michael Sent: Thursday, May 08, 2008 10:05 AM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: FW: Salt Rock 57 LLC (Ocean Properties) Wayne - Can you assemble a brief timeline for this project based upon application, approval, and DO deadline dates. In addition, if they did give any indication of when they thought things might happen, maybe we can include that as well. Not sure there is a lot in that area but maybe something in the file. Thanks. t Michael L. Delk, AICP Planning Director City of Clearwater, Florida myclearwater.com - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Horne, William Sent: Thursday, May 08, 2008 10:02 AM To: Delk, Michael Subject: RE: Salt Rock 57 LLC (Ocean Properties) I think Cm Gibson is only interested in the Salt Rock 57 LLC timeline for development... Bill 5/8/2008, F Page 2 of 2 Bill Horne, ICMA -CM City Manager Clearwater, FL (727) 562 -4046 - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Delk, Michael Sent: Thursday, May 08, 2008 9:59 AM To: Horne, William Subject: RE: Salt Rock 57 LLC (Ocean Properties) No problem. Is our main focus of the timeline the point at which the the new ownership /development assumed responsibility from Taylor Woodrow or does it go back to the Taylor Woodrow commencement of the process? Michael L. Delk, AICP Planning Director City of Clearwater, Florida myclearwater.com - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Horne, William Sent: Thursday, May 08, 2008 9:24 AM To: Delk, Michael Subject: Salt Rock 57 LLC (Ocean Properties) Michael, Can you provide a timeline associated with the development of the former Adams Mark/Taylor Woodrow property that is now owned and managed by Salt Rock 57 LLC (Ocean Properties). Cm Gibson has asked me for this information if it is available. Bill Horne, ICMA -CM City Manager Clearwater, FL (727) 562 -4046 5/8/2008 Page 1 of 1 Wells, Wayne. From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Wednesday, April 16, 2008 5:29 PM To: 'MTwitty @RealtyDecisions.com' Subject: Indigo Beach. site (former Adam's Mark) Mike - My recollection of the property at 430 S. Gulfview Blvd. (formerly Adam's Mark) was that the application for development approval was already in process when Salt Block 57 LLC bought the property. Regardless, I am attaching the Staff Report and Development Order for the most recent application for this property. Potentially, between these two documents, they should give you some answers to your questions. Should you have questions after you have read these documents, contact me back. Wayne - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Michael Twitty.[ mailto :mtwitty@realtydecisions.com] Sent: Wednesday, April 16, 2008 2:50 PM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: Indigo Beach site (former Adam's Mark) Hi Wayne, I am trying to get a handle on what the entitlement status was at time of sale (12/21/07) for the Indigo Beach site (former Adam's Mark). The purchaser, Salt Block 57, LLC, had reported planning to. develop a 230 -room vacation club hotel facility at time of sale. Was this a legal density at time of sale? If not, is it conceivable that it can be obtained? Perhaps they have already submitted something to planning that is currently pending that you can enlighten me on. Regards, Mike. Michael T. Twitty State - Certified General Appraiser 1723 Vice President Entreken Associates, Inc. 1100 16th Street N St. Petersburg, FL 33705 Phone: (727) 894 -1800 ext. 203 Fax: (727) 894 -8916 Cell: (727) 504 -5188. 4/16/2008 tampabay.cam / opinion Times ed�it®rial rew �.� S ip—e�cf Honey�R jiIs & - 1, }.. - Ru Red y,, 4 Trays ...00... 148.95 1 3 Trays ........ 145 95 2 Trays ........138.95 1 Tray.......... 134.95 '! 5 Plus Shipping & Handling i1 7), CHOOSE FROM 1,°1i % OUR FAMOUS SELECTION OF 0S 1 MARMALADE OFF 8 S OR 16 0Z. JAR !Ei r, CITRUS COUNTRY GRC:'ES. � ?I Its {`: i� Ii0tFW7•IeLA i:.fSFn(•fzr. tnna (-� m� ,s: 8:30 -5:30 Mori. -Sat. SEMINOLE �- CLEARWATER - 18200 U.S. 19 N 5800 Seminole Blvd. at Selleair iolidaycitroulsx.OM OF l YF—^IFZ2 IESS TED MCLAREN ( Times (2005) Debris marks the spot where the Adam's Mark hotel stood on Clearwater Beach after it was imploded in October 2005. The new owner of the parcel will seek approval of hotel plans Tuesday. As condo market falls, .oeor a hotel rises he old Adam's Mark hotel on Clearwater Beach was reduced to a pile of rub- ble in October 2005, and since then, the parcel with the million -dollar view of Clearwater Beach has been vacant except for a sales office and signs promot- ing the planned Indigo Beach Residences and Suites. ¶ Exit that developer, enter a new one. Taylor Woodrow, an interna- tional firm with deep pockets, took a big loss to sell the vacant Adam's Mark property for close to half what it paid for the par- cel in 2005. The company had planned to build condos — the Indigo Beach Residences — but there is an oversupply of con- dos in Pinellas County now, and that, combined with _the,trou- bled housing market and credit crunch, made buyers much too scarce for Taylor Woodrow. However, Taylor Woodrow's departure is not bad news for the community. Rather than con- dominiums, the new developer plans a hotel, which is what city officials had preferred all along. It is hotels, not condominium residences, that will boost Clear- water Beach's tourism potential. The new buyer, Salt Block 57 LLC, is affiliated with Ocean Properties, an international hotel developer and manager with a respected resume. The company operates more than 100 hotels in worth America. The new buyer paid $17.5 -mil- lion for the Clearwater Beach property on the west side of S Gulfview Boulevard and doesn't intend to leave it vacant for long. Salt Block 57 will seek approval of its hotel plan.s_,,whch include some variance requests, from the Clearwater Community Development Board on Tuesday of ..:rnoon, and if the project gets a thumbs up, construction could start in 2009. The building will be smaller than the one Taylor Woodrow had proposed because of smaller rooms and fewer parking spaces in the garage. The hotel plans call for 230 rooms. The downturn in the condo market presents a promising new opportunity. Clearwater's Beach By Design redevelopment plan had envisioned a new hotel district along S Gulfview Bou- levard, with the hotels front- ing on the city's new Beach Walk promenade, boosting the tax base and helping to pay for pub- lic improvements oiu the beach. When hotel financing seemed to dry up and. the czindo mar- ket boomed the i'a: t two years, would =be hotel developers began modifying their plans to include condominiums or condo -hotel units. That might h re been bet- ter than no redeve*,xaent at till, but it was not what the city had hoped to attract. Now, the'i6rket has taken another tum.,While every proj- ect should' get proper scru- tiny, Clearwater can seize this moment to get new hotel plans on the boards and help develop- ers navigate the plan review pro- cess. -Your letters �- r) ' Share your opinions I go to tampabay.com /lettors —•1 ,.. yr rli�...y r , TED MCLAREN ( Times (2005) Debris marks the spot where the Adam's Mark hotel stood on Clearwater Beach after it was imploded in October 2005. The new owner of the parcel will seek approval of hotel plans Tuesday. As condo market falls, .oeor a hotel rises he old Adam's Mark hotel on Clearwater Beach was reduced to a pile of rub- ble in October 2005, and since then, the parcel with the million -dollar view of Clearwater Beach has been vacant except for a sales office and signs promot- ing the planned Indigo Beach Residences and Suites. ¶ Exit that developer, enter a new one. Taylor Woodrow, an interna- tional firm with deep pockets, took a big loss to sell the vacant Adam's Mark property for close to half what it paid for the par- cel in 2005. The company had planned to build condos — the Indigo Beach Residences — but there is an oversupply of con- dos in Pinellas County now, and that, combined with _the,trou- bled housing market and credit crunch, made buyers much too scarce for Taylor Woodrow. However, Taylor Woodrow's departure is not bad news for the community. Rather than con- dominiums, the new developer plans a hotel, which is what city officials had preferred all along. It is hotels, not condominium residences, that will boost Clear- water Beach's tourism potential. The new buyer, Salt Block 57 LLC, is affiliated with Ocean Properties, an international hotel developer and manager with a respected resume. The company operates more than 100 hotels in worth America. The new buyer paid $17.5 -mil- lion for the Clearwater Beach property on the west side of S Gulfview Boulevard and doesn't intend to leave it vacant for long. Salt Block 57 will seek approval of its hotel plan.s_,,whch include some variance requests, from the Clearwater Community Development Board on Tuesday of ..:rnoon, and if the project gets a thumbs up, construction could start in 2009. The building will be smaller than the one Taylor Woodrow had proposed because of smaller rooms and fewer parking spaces in the garage. The hotel plans call for 230 rooms. The downturn in the condo market presents a promising new opportunity. Clearwater's Beach By Design redevelopment plan had envisioned a new hotel district along S Gulfview Bou- levard, with the hotels front- ing on the city's new Beach Walk promenade, boosting the tax base and helping to pay for pub- lic improvements oiu the beach. When hotel financing seemed to dry up and. the czindo mar- ket boomed the i'a: t two years, would =be hotel developers began modifying their plans to include condominiums or condo -hotel units. That might h re been bet- ter than no redeve*,xaent at till, but it was not what the city had hoped to attract. Now, the'i6rket has taken another tum.,While every proj- ect should' get proper scru- tiny, Clearwater can seize this moment to get new hotel plans on the boards and help develop- ers navigate the plan review pro- cess. -Your letters �- r) ' Share your opinions I go to tampabay.com /lettors CDB Meeting Date: January 15, 2008 Case Numbers: FLD2007- 11034 /TDR2005 -05022 Agenda Item: E4 Owner /Applicant: Salt Block 57, LLC Representative: E.D. Armstrong III, Esquire Address: 430 South Gulfview Boulevard CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT GENERAL INFORMATION: r ORIGINAL REQUEST: (1) Termination of Status of Nonconformity for density (217 overnight accommodation units; where 93 overnight accommodation units are permitted today), under the provisions of Section 6 -109; (2) Flexible Development approval to permit 230 overnight accommodation units in the Tourist (T) District with reductions to the front (east) setback from 15 feet to zero feet (to trash staging area), reductions to the side (north) setback from the Coastal Construction Control Line (CCCL) from 10 feet to six feet (to building) and to zero feet (to sidewalk), reductions to the side (south) setback from 10 feet to three feet (to sidewalk) and to zero feet (to trash staging area), reductions to the rear (west) setback from the CCCL from 20 feet to eight feet (to building) and to zero feet (to sidewalk), an increase to building height from 35 feet to 100 feet (to roof deck) and to 150 feet (to roof deck) for two portions of the building, a deviation to allow direct access to an arterial street and to allow a two - year time frame to submit for a building permit, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2- 803.C; and (3) including the Transfer of Development Rights of eight total dwelling units (being converted to 13 overnight accommodation units) previously approved and transferred under TDR2005- 05022, including four dwelling units from 557 and 579 Cyprus Avenue, one dwelling unit from 625 -627 Bay Esplanade and three .dwelling units from 667 Bay Esplanade, under the provisions of Section 4 -1402. CURRENT ZONING: Tourist (T) District and Open Space /Recreation (OS/R) District CURRENT FUTURE LAND Resort Facilities High (RFH) USE CATEGORY: BEACH BY DESIGN South Beach/Clearwater Pass District CHARACTER DISTRICT: PROPERTY USE: Current Use: Vacant Proposed'Use: 230 Overnight Accommodation units Community Development Board — January 15, 2008 FLD2007- 1 1 034/TDR2005 -05022 — Page 1 of 15 • EXISTING North: Tourist (T) District SURROUNDING ZONING South: Tourist (T) District AND USES: East: Tourist (T) District West: Preservation (P) District • Beach Attached dwellings Retail sales and services Water ANALYSIS: Site Location and Existing Conditions: The 2.45 total acres (1.87 acres zoned Tourist District; 0.58 acres zoned Open Space/Recreation District) is located on the west side of South Gulfview Boulevard approximately 500 feet northwest of Hamden Drive and directly south of Clearwater Beach. The former Adam's Mark Hotel on this property closed due to damage sustained during Hurricane Jeanne in September 2004. On. April 19, 2005, the Community Development Board (CDB) approved with 10 conditions Case Nos. FLD2005- 01005 /SGN2005 -01016 for the (1) Termination of Status of Nonconformity for density to allow the continuation of an existing 217 - room/unit hotel (where 74 rooms /units were permitted at that time) and for height to allow the existing 155 -foot high building (where a maximum height of 150 feet is permitted today); (2) Flexible Development approval to permit a 217 - room/unit overnight accommodation use with reductions to setbacks, an increase to building height from 35 feet to 155 feet (to existing roof deck) and a reduction to required parking from 217 to 201 spaces (existing), as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project; (3) Reduction to the required interior landscape area, as a Comprehensive Landscape Program; and (4) Comprehensive Sign Program approval (SGN2005- 01016). On August 16, 2005, the CDB approved with 18 conditions Case Nos. FLD2005- 05047/TDR2005 -05022 for the (1) Termination of Status of Nonconformity for density (217 overnight accommodation units existing to be converted to 104 dwelling units; where 56 dwelling units were permitted at that time); (2) Flexible Development approval to permit a mixed use of 112 attached dwelling units and 78 overnight accommodation rooms /units with reductions to setbacks, increases to building height from 35 feet 100 feet for the overnight accommodation building tower and from 35 feet to 150 feet for the residential tower (to roof deck), a reduction to driveway spacing from 125 feet to 90 feet and a deviation to allow direct access to a arterial street, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project; and (3) Transfer of Development Rights (TDR2005- 05022) of four dwelling units from 557 and 579 Cyprus Avenue, one dwelling unit from 625 -627 Bay Esplanade and three dwelling units from 667 Bay Esplanade. On June 20, 2006, a six -month time extension to February 16, 2007, was granted by the Planning Director to submit for a building permit to build the improvements. On November 21, 2006, a one -year time extension to February 16, 2008, was granted by the CDB to submit for a building permit to build the improvements. The hotel was not reopened and was demolished on October 8, 2005 under BCP2005- 09027. The 440 and 450 West attached dwelling condominiums towers are located to the south of this subject property and are 157 feet in height (each tower). The properties directly east of this property are developed with retail sales and services and restaurant uses. On September 20, 2005, the CDB approved Case No. FLD2005 -07068 for the properties to the northeast at 401, 411 and 421 South Gulfview Boulevard permitting 100 attached dwelling units in. a 100 -foot high building. This project has been granted a time extension by the CDB to March 20, 2008, to submit for a building permit to construct the improvements. The City's Beach Walk project is still under construction transforming South Gulfview Boulevard to the north of this site into a winding beachside promenade with lush landscaping, artistic touches and clear views to Clearwater's award - winning beach and the water beyond. A City public parking lot is located to the north of this property. The western submerged portion of the property is the Gulf of Mexico. Community Development Board — January 15, 2008 FLD2007- 11034/TDR2005 -05022 — Page 2 of 15 Development Proposal: The proposal is to construct a new building on the property with a vacation/interval ownership project consisting of 230 overnight accommodation units. The nonconforming status of the prior hotel density has been determined to still be valid, even though the hotel was demolished, due to the status of the approval of Case Nos. FLD2005- 05047/TDR2005 -05022 and the time extensions granted. With a vacation/interval ownership use, unit sizes are generally larger than normal overnight accommodation uses. The size of these proposed units are similar to that of dwelling units. To ensure use of this property will be for overnight accommodations, meeting the definition of the Community Development Code, owner and guest stays should not to exceed 30 days (whether occupancy of units arise from a rental agreement, other agreement or the payment of consideration). This development will not be deemed attached dwellings with individual dwelling units, nor will the units qualify for homestead exemption or home or business occupational licenses. The proposal includes three floors of parking for a total of 409 parking spaces at a ratio of 1.76 spaces per unit (one space per unit required). Due to the nature of the proposed vacation/interval ownership units, coupled with a desire to ensure adequate parking is available for guests and their visitors within the garage, 178 spaces in excess of the minimum Code requirement have been provided. The applicant will provide a 10 -foot wide concrete sidewalk along the site frontage of South Gulfview Boulevard with a shell finish, in accordance with Beach Walk specifications. The proposal includes one poolside restaurant and bar on the fourth level. The property's guest services will encourage guests to patronize local restaurants and entertainment activities. The building has been designed with a lower tower on the south side at a height of almost 100 feet, since the existing 440 West condominium tower to the south is 157 feet in height, to comply with Beach by Design requirements for tower heights. A higher portion of the building tower on the north side is at a height of 150 feet. This higher portion is separated from the 440 West condominium tower by approximately 158 feet to comply with the Beach by Design requirement to have a minimum spacing of 100 feet between towers exceeding 100 feet in height. The fourth level of this building is the amenity level, including the pool, poolside restaurantibar, guest lounge, health/fitness, kid's club /arcade, administrative and sales offices and maintenance /operations areas. Levels 5 — 16 will have the interval ownership units, ranging from a minimum of nine units on the uppermost three floors on the north side to a maximum of 27 units on the lower levels. Units will range from 816 to 1993 square feet in size. The proposed building has been designed using a contemporary coastal architectural style. From a bird's eye view, the building will look like an "H" on top of the parking deck base. The building form is divided vertically into three components: the three -story base of the parking garage, the middle body made up of the amenity level and guest units on Levels 4 — 11, and the upper cap of Levels 12 — 16 consisting of the luxury suites of that portion of the building above 100 feet (the middle of the "H" and the northern portion). In addition to the tiering of building height due to Beach by Design tower spacing requirements basically on a north/south axis, the building steps back in the middle of the building (middle of the "H ") facing South Gulfview Boulevard and the upper cap portion on the north side further steps back an additional 12 feet (from the middle body face). Viewed from the north and south, the building also steps back on the west side at Level 5 and then again at Levels 12 — 16. The fagade of the body of the building is typified by modulations in the floor plan that move in and out between five to 10 feet a minimum of once in each 28 -foot structural bay. The building fagade is further detailed with six - to- eight -foot deep balconies and occasionally a small awning -style metal roof. The building form creates strong shadow patterns that define the elements of the project's form. The upper cap pattern of the building is different from the body of the building and helps to break down the massing of the building. This is most evident on the north elevation where two 12 -foot deep slots are cut into the upper four floors effectively dividing the upper mass into three sections. The location of the balconies on this upper cap area in relation to balconies on the body of the building and stepping back at the tower corners help create a tiered effect. The upper roof portions of the building are punctuated by accent metal roof elements containing stairs, elevator overruns and mechanical rooms, as well as horizontal shading Community Development Board — January 15, 2008 FLD2007- 11034/TDR2005 -05022 — Page 3 of 15 elements. Balconies, roof eaves and shade structures meet Code requirements for encroachments into setbacks. The majority of the building will be painted cottage cream, accented by white columns, pilasters and balcony, eave and shade structure bracing. Accent metal roof structures at various levels of the building and at the very top of the building will be of a muted green color (arboretum or sea moss). Balcony railings will be black. The applicant is requesting a two -year development order due to market conditions. Section 4 -407 specifies that an application for a building permit must be submitted within one year of the date the CDB approves the project, unless otherwise specified under this approval. Density: Pursuant to the Countywide Future Land Use Plan, the maximum density for properties with a designation of Resort Facilities High is 50 overnight accommodation units per acre. Based on the 1.87 acres zoned Tourist District, a maximum of 93 overnight accommodation units are permissible under current regulations. The former Adam's Mark Hotel had 217 units, which was. nonconforming to current regulations. The applicant is requesting Termination of Status of Nonconformity for density to maintain the same number of overnight accommodation units in a conforming manner (see discussion- below). The applicant previously transferred eight dwelling units under TDR2005 -05022 from three locations on the beach to this site and intends to convert these eight dwelling units to 13 overnight accommodation units (1.67 conversion ratio) (see Transfer of Development Rights discussion later in this Staff Report). Termination of Status of Nonconformity: The development proposal includes a request for Termination of Status of Nonconformity for density (217 overnight accommodation units; where 93 overnight accommodation units are permitted today). The nonconforming status of the prior hotel density has been determined to still be valid, even though the hotel was demolished, due to the status of the approval of Case Nos. FLD2005- 05047/TDR2005 -05022 and the time extensions granted. An important factor in this case is the ability to retain an overnight accommodation use on the beach where many hotels /motels have been lost to condominium (attached dwelling) construction. The criteria for Termination of Status of Nonconformity, as per Section 6 -109 of the Community Development Code and outlined in the table below, including compliance with perimeter buffer requirements, the provision of required landscaping for off - street parking lots and bringing nonconforming signs, lighting and accessory uses /structures into compliance with the Code will be met with this development proposal. f'nncictPnt I inrnn6QtPnt 1. Perimeter buffers conforming to the requirements of Section 3- 1202.D of the N/A Community Development Code shall be installed. 2. Off - street parking lots shall be improved to meet the landscaping standards established X in Section 3- 1202.E of the Community Development Code. 3. Any nonconforming sign, outdoor lighting or other accessory structure or accessory X use located on the lot shall be terminated, removed or brought into conformity with this development code. . 4. The comprehensive landscaping and comprehensive sign programs may be used to X satisfy the requirements of this section. Pursuant to Section 3- 1202.1), there are no perimeter buffers required in the Tourist District. While there is an existing surface parking lot on the subject property, it will be removed with this proposal. All proposed parking will be within a parking garage, where landscaping is not required. Any prior nonconforming signs, outdoor lighting or other accessory structures /uses have already been removed when the Adam's Mark Hotel was demolished. A Comprehensive Landscape Program is not required for this proposal, as the proposed landscaping meets Code requirements. Should the applicant desire Community Development Board — January 15, 2008 FLD2007- 11034/TDR2005 -05022 — Page 4 of 15 attached or freestanding signage in excess of minimum Code requirements, the Comprehensive Sign Program may be used for proposed signage. Transfer of Development Rights (TDR): Pursuant to Section 4 -1402 of the Community Development Code, parcels governed by a special area plan, such as Beach by Design, may only receive density transfers from parcels within the same special area plan. The Code does not limit the number of overnight accommodation units that may be transferred to this site, as opposed to residential. transfers that may not exceed the otherwise applicable maximum density by more than 20 percent. However, for comparative purposes, the maximum number of overnight accommodation units permitted today on this site is 93 units, where a 20 percent transfer would be a maximum of 18 units. In this case, eight dwelling units were previously transferred to this site and are being converted to 13 overnight accommodation units, which is less than 20 percent of the maximum number of overnight accommodation units permitted today. The applicant has previously transferred a total of eight dwelling units under TDR2005- 05022, including four dwelling units from 557 and 579 Cyprus Avenue, one dwelling unit from 625 -627 Bay Esplanade and three dwelling units from 667 Bay Esplanade. This proposal is recognizing this prior transfer. Accordingly, the TDR has been found to be consistent with the requirements of Section 4 -1402 and Section 4 -1403 of the Community Development Code as outlined in the following table: Consistent I Inconsistent 1. The development of the parcel proposed for development will not reduce the fair market X value of abutting properties; 2. The uses within the project are otherwise permitted in the City of Clearwater; X 3. The uses or mix of uses within the project are compatible with adjacent land uses; X 4. The development of the parcel proposed for development will upgrade the immediate X vicinity of the parcel proposed for development; and 5. The design of the proposed project creates a form and function that enhances the X community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. Impervious Surface Ratio O.S.R.): Pursuant to Section 2 -801.1 of the Community Development Code, the maximum allowable I.S.R. is 0.95. The overall proposed I.S.R. is 0.81, which is consistent with the Code provisions. Minimum Lot Area and Width: Pursuant to Table 2 -803 of the Community Development Code, the minimum lot area for overnight accommodations is 20,000 square feet. The subject property is 81,450 square feet in area landward of the seawall (zoned Tourist District). Pursuant to the same Table, the minimum lot width for overnight accommodations can range between 100 — 150 feet. The lot width of this site along South Gulfview Boulevard is 235 feet. The proposal is consistent with these Code provisions. Minimum Setbacks: Pursuant to Table 2 -803 of the Community Development Code, the minimum front setback for overnight accommodations can range between zero — 15 feet, the minimum side setback can range between zero — 10 feet and the minimum rear setback can range between zero — 20 feet. This site contains a Coastal Construction Control Line (CCCL) along the west and north sides of the property. Section 3 -905.A requires setbacks to be measured from the CCCL. The proposal includes reductions to the front (east) setback from 15 feet to zero feet (to trash staging area), reductions to the side (north) setback from the Coastal Construction Control Line (CCCL) from 10 feet to six feet (to building) and to zero feet (to sidewalk), reductions to the side (south) setback from 10 feet to three feet (to sidewalk) and Community Development Board — January 15, 2008 FLD2007- 11034 /TDR2005 -05022 — Page 5 of 15 to zero feet (to trash staging area) and reductions to the rear (west) setback from the CCCL from 20 feet to eight feet (to building) and to zero feet (to sidewalk). The proposed building has been designed maintaining the minimum 15 -foot front setback along South Gulfview Boulevard to the building. The building will have a refuse holding room on the ground floor on the south side of the first parking level. Dumpsters will be rolled out to the staging area on collection days. The location of the trash staging area within the front setback at a zero front setback from South Gulfview Boulevard is necessary to eliminate the necessity of the trash truck coming on -site and is common with many newer developments. The CCCL along the north property line is at an angle to and is not parallel with the north property line, being narrower at the front property line and wider towards the seawall at the rear of the building. The proposed reduction to the side (north) setback to six feet to the building is at the western portion of the building where the CCCL cuts greatest into the property. The upper habitable portions of the building (Levels 4 — 16) are actually over 11 feet from the north property line, even though the setback is not measured from that point. Levels 1 — 3 are actually approximately 15 feet to the north property line. The site has been designed with a sidewalk along the north side of the building at a zero -foot setback to the CCCL. This sidewalk is required by the Fire Department for access to the rear of the building in the event of a fire. This sidewalk also provides required Building Code egress from stairwells on both the south and north sides of the building and interconnects with the sidewalk on the south side of the City's parking lot to the north. The proposed reduction to the side (south) setback to three feet is for a sidewalk that provides required Building Code egress from the southern stairwell through the service drive out to the public sidewalk within the South Gulfview Boulevard right -of -way. The proposed reduction for the trash staging area and service drive at a zero side setback is for less than 100 feet depth from the front property line. While not required by Code, the applicant is providing the service drive on the south side of the building for delivery trucks, while also functioning for the trash staging area. To reduce negative views of this area as a means of compatibility, the applicant is screening this service area adjacent to the south property line with a six -foot high wall. Levels 1 — 3 are actually approximately 15 feet to the south property line. The upper habitable portions of the building (Levels 4 — 11) are actually 11 feet from the south property line. The proposed setback reduction to eight feet to the building at the rear or west side is from the CCCL and is at the southwest corner of the building where the building is closest to the CCCL, whereas the building is approximately located 20 feet from the seawall. This setback reduction from the CCCL to eight feet is for only Levels 1 — 5, as Levels 6 — 11 step back to approximately 36 feet from the seawall (24 feet to the CCCL). The rear setback reduction to zero feet is for the sidewalk on the west side of the building, which is primarily to provide required Building Code egress from the stairwells and to provide Fire Department access in the event of a fire. The proposed setbacks are similar to those approved by the CDB on August 16, 2005, on Case Nos. FLD2005- 05047/TDR2005- 05022. Maximum Building Height: Pursuant to Table 2 -803 of the Community Development Code, the maximum allowable height for overnight accommodation uses is 100 feet. Beach by Design permits buildings up to a maximum of 150 feet through the use of Transfer of Development Rights, which this proposal employs. The building has been designed in a tiered manner with a lower tower on the south side at a height of almost 100 feet, since the existing 440 West condominium tower to the south is 157 feet in height, to comply with Beach by Design requirements for tower heights. A higher portion of the building tower on the north side is at a height of 150 feet. This higher portion is separated from the 440 West condominium tower by approximately 158 feet to comply with the Beach by Design and the Transfer of Development Rights requirement to have a minimum spacing of 100 feet between towers exceeding 100 feet in height. The applicant has previously transferred eight dwelling units to this property from three other properties on the beach. Based on a conversion factor of 1.67 (50 overnight accommodation units to 30 dwelling units), these eight dwelling units convert to 13 overnight accommodation units. The proposed height of the lower and taller portions of the tower is consistent and Community Development Board — January 15, 2008 FLD2007- 11034/TDR2005 -05022 — Page 6 of 15 compatible with the heights of adjacent properties. This site is located within the Clearwater Pass District of Beach by Design, which is indicated as a distinctive area of mixed use, including high -rise condominiums. The applicant has submitted documentation indicating compliance with the Beach by Design criteria for no more than two buildings more than 100 feet in height within 500 feet of each other. The proposal also complies with the Code requirements under the definition of "Height, Building or Structure" for elevator and stair overruns and mechanical rooms, . which are permitted to extend a maximum of 16 feet above the otherwise permitted height. Since both portions of the roof meet the maximum height limitations of the Code and Beach by Design, the definition of . "Height, Building or Structure" does not allow rooftop occupancy by the public or guests. Approval of this request should be conditioned prohibiting such rooftop use. The design of this project creates a form and function that will be consistent with and enhance the character of this area. Minimum Off - Street Parking: Pursuant to Table 2 -803 of the Community Development Code, the minimum required parking is one parking space per unit, or 230 parking spaces. The proposal provides a total of 409 parking spaces. Three parking spaces are provided on the north side of the building as taxi waiting spaces. Guest parking is provided at a ratio of 1.76 spaces per unit. -Due to the nature of the proposed vacation/interval ownership units, coupled with a desire to ensure adequate parking is available for guests and their visitors within the garage, 178 spaces in excess of the minimum Code requirement have been provided. The applicant is providing this excess parking to deal with the seasonal congestion on the beach and the lack to -date of new public parking facilities, while ensuring that all parking demands of this project can be accommodated on -site. There are parking spaces on all three levels of the parking garage where, due to adjacent solid building walls for stairwells or trash rooms, motorists will be required to back out blindly from these spaces. In order to aid motorists, mirrors will be installed and signage installed in front of these spaces alerting the motorists to use these mirrors when backing. The civil and architectural plans need to be coordinated as to the location of these mirrors and signage prior to the issuance of any permits. The proposal includes a drop off area along the front of and under the building with 150 feet of stacking space, allowing vehicle stacking to not interfere with vehicles entering or exiting the parking garage nor with traffic flow on South Gulfview Boulevard. The proposal includes a loading /unloading service area at the southeast corner of the site for large delivery trucks, which is not required by Code and will prevent blocking traffic on South Gulfview Boulevard. Smaller delivery vehicles can also utilize the drop off area. The parking garage is designed with a total of 46 stacked valet parking spaces, to allow the resort to provide valet parking service for some guests. The drop off area will also be used to access this valet service. The site has been designed providing access via one -way driveways, with the entrance on the north and the exit on the south of the site. The proposal includes a deviation to allow direct access to an arterial street. The site has no other means of street access except to South Gulfview Boulevard, which is currently designated an arterial street in the Transportation Element of the Comprehensive Plan.. Access is much as the former Adam's Mark Hotel previously had. With Beach Walk construction, Coronado Drive will function as the main arterial street between the roundabout and Hamden Drive, south of the subject property. This change of street designation will be included in the upcoming Comprehensive Plan update. Mechanical Equipment: Pursuant to Section 3- 201.D.1 of the Community Development Code, all outside mechanical equipment shall be screened so as not to be visible from public streets and/or abutting properties. The proposed parking garage will be open air, where fans will not be necessary to effect air flow in the garage. The applicant is proposing mechanical equipment to be located on the roofs of the building within enclosures meeting Code requirements for maximum height above the flat roof. Based upon this, the development proposal is consistent with the Code with regard to screening of outdoor mechanical equipment. Community Development Board — January 15, 2008 FLD2007- 11034/TDR2005 -05022 — Page 7 of 15 0 0 Sight Visibilfty Triangles: Pursuant to Section 3 -904.A of the Community Development Code, to minimize hazards at driveway intersections with South Gulfview Boulevard, no structures or landscaping may be installed which will obstruct views at a level between 30 inches above grade and eight feet above grade within 20 -foot sight visibility triangles. The proposed site and landscape design meet this requirement. Pursuant to Section 3 -904.B of the Community Development Code, to enhance views of the water from waterfront property, no structures or landscaping may be installed (other than non - opaque fences not exceeding 36- inches .in height) within waterfront visibility triangles. The proposal indicates waterfront visibility triangles at the northwest and southwest corners of the seawall. but these are not drawn according to Code requirements. Prior to the issuance of any permits, the applicant will need to correctly show these waterfront visibility triangles on the site and landscape plans. Utilities: Pursuant to Section 3 -911 of the Community Development Code, for development that does not involve a subdivision, all utilities including individual distribution lines shall be installed underground unless such undergrounding is not practicable. The civil site plan for this proposal indicates that all on- site electric and communication lines will be placed underground in conformance with this Code requirement. Landscaping: Pursuant to Section 3- 1202.13 of the Community Development Code, there are no perimeter buffers required in the Tourist District for this site. The landscape design incorporates plant material that is native and salt tolerant, while providing visual interest. Medjool Date Palms are proposed along the front of the site to provide height and scale to the building. The pedestrian scale along South Gulfview Boulevard will be further enhanced through the use of ornamental trees, accent shrubs and dense groundcover beds. The north, south and west sides of the building will be enhanced with Cabbage Palms and other salt tolerant vegetation to create a landscape that will contribute to the overall sense of place and be coordinated with Beach Walk improvements to provide a seamless feel between properties. The proposed on -site landscaping complies with and exceeds Code requirements. Vertical concrete curbing is required on -site to protect landscape materials and areas from vehicular encroachment. The edges of the trash staging area are not curbed, as this area is also intended to double as a delivery truck loading area. Prior to the issuance of any permits, the civil plans should be amended to include such curbing. To ensure proposed site grading of swales and yard grate inlets works with the proposed landscaping, the site plan should include detailed perimeter grading prior to the issuance of any permits. Finally, there are double doors from the building adjacent to the trash holding room on the south side that will require a stoop. Presently these doors appear to open into a landscape area. Solid Waste: The proposal will utilize interval ownership staff to remove trash from units. A trash chute is located adjacent to a housekeeping service elevator. Staff will roll full dumpsters to a trash holding room on the south side of the building. These trash dumpsters will be rolled to a trash staging area on the south side of the property adjacent to South Gulfview Boulevard on trash days. The proposal has been found to be acceptable by the City's Solid Waste Department. Si ng_age: No freestanding or attached signage is proposed at this time for this overnight accommodation use. Freestanding signage in the Tourist District is restricted to a maximum height of four feet, or six feet through a Comprehensive Sign Program. Any approval of this application should include a condition allowing for freestanding signage, where such future freestanding signage must be a monument -style sign meeting Code requirements and be designed to match the exterior materials and color of the building. Community Development Board — January 15, 2008 FLD2007- 11034/TDR2005 -05022 — Page 8 of 15 Additional Beach by Design Guidelines: Section B.3 requires the floorplate of any building exceeding 45 feet in height be limited to a maximum of 25,000 square feet between 45 — 100 feet and a maximum of 10,000 square feet between 100 — 150 feet, but allows deviations to these floorplate requirements provided the mass and scale of the design creates a tiered effect and complies with the maximum building envelop allowance above 45 feet. The largest floorplate between 45 — 100 feet is approximately 43,179 square feet and between 100 — 150 feet approximately 20,832 square feet. The applicant requests such deviations. The Design Guidelines provide that no more than 60 percent of the theoretical maximum building envelop located above 45 feet be occupied by a building. The applicant has calculated the overall building mass between 45 — 150 feet at 44.5 percent. This Staff Report has discussed the tiering effect of the building design, which Staff believes is acceptable, to justify the increased floorplates proposed. Section C.1 requires buildings with a footprint of greater than 5,000 square feet to be constructed so that no more than two of the three building dimensions in the vertical or horizontal planes are equal in length. The proposed building footprint is approximately 60,804 square feet. The project's overall horizontal plane dimensions are approximately 207.5 feet along South Gulfview Boulevard and 276 feet along the north side, while the vertical plane is approximately 160 feet from grade to the top of the tallest roof. None of these dimensions are equal. Modulation of the building massing also provides considerable dimensional variation. Section C.2 requires no plane or elevation to continue uninterrupted for greater than 100 feet without an offset of more than five feet. The building massing modulates significantly on the east and west elevations as the two portions of the tower on the north and south sides are expressed, where the middle of the "H" is recessed approximately 40 feet from the front of the building and approximately 148 feet on the west side of the building. The north portions of the tower steps back 14 feet at Levels 12 — 16 on both the east and west ends. The planes of all elevations provide in and out modulation of five — 10 feet, where the largest uninterrupted plane is approximately 29 feet (significantly less than 100 feet). Section C.3 requires at least 60 percent of any elevation to be covered with windows or architectural decoration. The applicant has calculated that the north elevation is at 62.6 percent, the east elevation at 70.7 percent, the south elevation at 66.1 percent and the west elevation at 68.8 percent. Code Enforcement Analysis: There are no outstanding Code Enforcement issues associated with the subject property. Community Development Board — January 15, 2008 FLD2007- 11034 /TDR2005 -05022 — Page 9 of 15 • • COMPLIANCE WITH STANDARDS AND CRITERIA: The following table depicts the consistency of the overnight accommodation use development proposal with the standards as per Tables 2 -801.1 and 2 -803 of the Community Development Code: I Per Termination of Status of Nonconformity, conversion calculations and Transfer of Development Rights under TDR2005 -05022 2 See analysis in Staff Report 3 Setbacks are measured from the Coastal Construction Control Line (CCCL) 4 Increased height available pursuant to Transfer of Development Rights and Beach by Design guidelines Community Development Board — January 15, 2008 FLD2007- 11034/TDR2005 -05022 —Page 10 of 15 Standard Proposed Consistent Inconsistent Density 50 overnight accommodation units per 230 overnight X' acre (maximum of 93 units) accommodation units 122.99 OVU /acre I.S.R. 0.95 0.81 X Lot Area 20,000 sq. ft. 81,450 sq. ft. (upland area X zoned T District; site also has 25,954 sq. ft. of submerged land zoned OS /R District Lot Width 100 feet 235 feet X Setbacks Front: 0 — 15 feet 15 feet (to building and X2 pavement); zero feet (to trash staging area) Side: 0 — 10 feet North 3: Six feet (to X2 building); zero feet (to sidewalk South: three feet (to X2 sidewalk); zero feet (to trash staging area Rear: 0 — 20 feet' eight feet (to building); zero X2 feet (to sidewalk) Height 35 — 100 feet 100 feet (to lower roof X2 deck) and to 150 feet (to highest roof deck )4 Off - Street One space per unit (230 spaces) 409 spaces X2 Parkin I Per Termination of Status of Nonconformity, conversion calculations and Transfer of Development Rights under TDR2005 -05022 2 See analysis in Staff Report 3 Setbacks are measured from the Coastal Construction Control Line (CCCL) 4 Increased height available pursuant to Transfer of Development Rights and Beach by Design guidelines Community Development Board — January 15, 2008 FLD2007- 11034/TDR2005 -05022 —Page 10 of 15 COMPLIANCE WITH FLEXIBILITY CRITERIA: The following table depicts the consistency of the development proposal with the Flexibility criteria as per Section 2 -803.0 of the Community Development Code (Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project): Community Development Board — January 15, 2008 FLD2007- 11034/TDR2005 -05022 —Page 11 of 15 Consistent Inconsistent 1. The development or redevelopment is otherwise impractical without deviations from X the use and /or development standards set forth in this zoning district. 2. The development or redevelopment will be consistent with the goals and policies of X the Comprehensive Plan, as well as with the general purpose, intent and basic planning objectives of this Code, and with the intent and purpose of this zoning district. 3. The development or redevelopment will not impede the normal and orderly X development and improvement of surrounding properties. 4. Adjoining properties will not suffer substantial detriment as a result of the proposed X development 5. The proposed use shall otherwise be permitted by the underlying future land use X category, be compatible with adjacent land uses, will not substantially alter the essential use characteristics of the neighborhood; and shall demonstrate compliance with one or more of the following objectives: a. The proposed use is permitted in this zoning district as a minimum standard, flexible standard or flexible development use; b. The proposed use would be a significant economic contributor to the City's economic base by diversifying the local economy or by creating jobs; c. The development proposal accommodates the expansion or redevelopment of an existing economic contributor; d. The proposed use provides for the provision of affordable housing; e. The proposed use provides for development or redevelopment in an area that is characterized by other similar development and where a land use plan amendment and rezoning would result in a spot land use or zoning designation; or f The proposed use provides for the development of a new and/or preservation of a working waterfront use. 6. Flexibility with regard to use, lot width, required setbacks, height and off - street X parking are justified based on demonstrated compliance with all of the following design objectives: a. The proposed development will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of the surrounding properties for uses permitted in this zoning district; b. The proposed development complies with applicable design guidelines adopted by the City; c. The design, scale and intensity of the proposed development supports the established or emerging character of an area; d. In order to form a cohesive, visually interesting and attractive appearance, the proposed development incorporates a substantial number of the following design elements: ❑ Changes in horizontal building planes; ❑ Use of architectural details such as columns, cornices, stringcourses, pilasters, porticos, balconies, railings, awnings, etc.; ❑ Variety in materials, colors and textures; ❑ Distinctive fenestration patterns; ❑ Building stepbacks; and ❑ Distinctive roofs forms. e. The proposed development provides for appropriate buffers, enhanced landscape design and appropriate distances between buildings. Community Development Board — January 15, 2008 FLD2007- 11034/TDR2005 -05022 —Page 11 of 15 COMPLIANCE WITH GENERAL STANDARDS FOR LEVEL TWO APPROVALS: The following table depicts the consistency of the development proposal with the General Standards for Level Two Approvals as per Section 3 -913 of the Community Development Code: SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION: The Development Review Committee (DRC) reviewed the application and supporting materials at its meeting of December 6, 2007, and deemed the development proposal to be sufficient to move forward to the Community Development Board (CDB), based upon the following findings of fact and conclusions of law: Findings of Fact: 1. The 2.45 total acres (1.87 acres zoned Tourist District; 0.58 acres zoned Open Space /Recreation District) is located on the west side of South Gulfview Boulevard approximately 500 feet northwest of Hamden Drive and directly south of Clearwater Beach; 2. On April 19, 2005, the Community Development Board (CDB) approved with 10 conditions Case Nos. FLD2005- 01005 /SGN2005 -01016 for the (1) Termination of Status of Nonconformity for density to allow the continuation of an existing 217 - room/unit hotel (where 74 rooms /units were permitted at that time) and for height to allow the existing 155 -foot high building (where a maximum height of 150 feet is permitted today); (2) Flexible Development approval to permit a 217- room/unit overnight accommodation use with reductions to setbacks, an increase to building height from 35 feet to 155 feet (to existing roof deck) and a reduction to required parking from 217 to 201 spaces (existing) as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project; (3) Reduction to-the required interior landscape area, as a Comprehensive Landscape Program; and (4) Comprehensive Sign Program approval (SGN2005- 01016); 3. On August 16, 2005, the CDB approved with 18 conditions Case Nos. FLD2005-05047/TDR2005- 05022 for the (1) Termination of Status of Nonconformity for density (217 overnight accommodation units existing to be converted to 104 dwelling units; where 56 dwelling units wee permitted at that time); (2) Flexible Development approval to permit a mixed use of 112 attached dwelling units and 78 overnight accommodation rooms /units with reductions to setbacks, increases to building height from 35 feet 100 feet for the overnight accommodation building tower and from 35 feet to 150 feet for the residential tower (to roof deck), a reduction to driveway spacing from 125 feet to 90 feet and a deviation to allow direct access to a arterial street, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project; and (3) Transfer of Development Rights (TDR2005- 05022) of four dwelling units from 557 and ,579 Cyprus Avenue, one dwelling unit from 625 -627 Bay Esplanade and three dwelling units from 667 Bay Esplanade; Community Development Board — January 15, 2008 FLD2007- 11034/TDR2005 -05022 — Page 12 of 15 Consistent Inconsistent 1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, X coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage development and use of X adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons X residing or working in the neighborhood. 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. X 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the X immediate vicinity. 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including X visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts on adjacent properties. SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION: The Development Review Committee (DRC) reviewed the application and supporting materials at its meeting of December 6, 2007, and deemed the development proposal to be sufficient to move forward to the Community Development Board (CDB), based upon the following findings of fact and conclusions of law: Findings of Fact: 1. The 2.45 total acres (1.87 acres zoned Tourist District; 0.58 acres zoned Open Space /Recreation District) is located on the west side of South Gulfview Boulevard approximately 500 feet northwest of Hamden Drive and directly south of Clearwater Beach; 2. On April 19, 2005, the Community Development Board (CDB) approved with 10 conditions Case Nos. FLD2005- 01005 /SGN2005 -01016 for the (1) Termination of Status of Nonconformity for density to allow the continuation of an existing 217 - room/unit hotel (where 74 rooms /units were permitted at that time) and for height to allow the existing 155 -foot high building (where a maximum height of 150 feet is permitted today); (2) Flexible Development approval to permit a 217- room/unit overnight accommodation use with reductions to setbacks, an increase to building height from 35 feet to 155 feet (to existing roof deck) and a reduction to required parking from 217 to 201 spaces (existing) as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project; (3) Reduction to-the required interior landscape area, as a Comprehensive Landscape Program; and (4) Comprehensive Sign Program approval (SGN2005- 01016); 3. On August 16, 2005, the CDB approved with 18 conditions Case Nos. FLD2005-05047/TDR2005- 05022 for the (1) Termination of Status of Nonconformity for density (217 overnight accommodation units existing to be converted to 104 dwelling units; where 56 dwelling units wee permitted at that time); (2) Flexible Development approval to permit a mixed use of 112 attached dwelling units and 78 overnight accommodation rooms /units with reductions to setbacks, increases to building height from 35 feet 100 feet for the overnight accommodation building tower and from 35 feet to 150 feet for the residential tower (to roof deck), a reduction to driveway spacing from 125 feet to 90 feet and a deviation to allow direct access to a arterial street, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project; and (3) Transfer of Development Rights (TDR2005- 05022) of four dwelling units from 557 and ,579 Cyprus Avenue, one dwelling unit from 625 -627 Bay Esplanade and three dwelling units from 667 Bay Esplanade; Community Development Board — January 15, 2008 FLD2007- 11034/TDR2005 -05022 — Page 12 of 15 4. The nonconforming status of the prior hotel density has been determined to still be valid, even though the hotel was demolished, due to the status of the approval of Case Nos. FLD2005- 05047/TDR2005 -05022 and the time extensions granted; 5. The proposal is to construct a new building on the property with a vacation/interval ownership project consisting of 230 overnight accommodation units; 6. The development proposal includes a request for Termination of Status of Nonconformity for density (217 overnight accommodation units; where 93 overnight accommodation units are permitted today); 7. Eight dwelling units were previously transferred to this. site under TDR2005 -05022 and are being converted to 13 overnight accommodation units for this project; 8. The proposal includes three floors of parking for a total of 409 parking spaces at a ratio of 1.76 spaces per unit (where one space per unit is required); 9. The proposal includes a deviation to allow direct access to an arterial street, where the site has no other means of street access except to South Gulfview Boulevard; 10. With Beach Walk construction, Coronado Drive will function as the main arterial street between the roundabout and Hamden Drive, south of the subject property and this change of street designation will be included in the upcoming Comprehensive Plan update; 11. The proposal includes reductions to the front (east) setback from 15 feet to zero feet (to trash staging area), reductions to the side (north) setback from the Coastal Construction Control Line (CCCL) from 10 feet to six feet (to building) and to zero feet (to sidewalk), reductions to the side (south) setback from 10 feet to three feet (to sidewalk) and to zero feet (to trash staging area) and reductions to the rear (west) setback from the CCCL from 20 feet to eight feet (to building) and to zero feet (to sidewalk); 12. The proposal includes an increase to building height from 35 feet to 100 feet (to roof .deck) and to 150 feet (to roof deck) for two portions of the building; 13. The higher portion of the building is separated from the 440 West condominium tower to the south by approximately 158 feet, which is in compliance with the Beach by Design requirement to have a minimum spacing of 100 feet between towers exceeding 100 feet in height; 14. The proposal includes a request for deviations to Beach by Design guidelines which require the floorplate of any building exceeding 45 feet in height be limited to a maximum of 25,000 square feet between 45 — 100 feet and a maximum of 10,000 square feet between 100 — 150 feet, as the largest floorplate between 45 — 100 feet is approximately 43,179 square feet and between 100 — 150 feet is approximately 20,832 square feet, but the guideline allows deviations to these floorplate requirements provided the mass and scale of the design creates a tiered effect and complies with the maximum building envelop allowance above 45 feet; 15. Beach by Design guidelines requires for buildings with a footprint of greater than 5,000 square feet, where the proposal is approximately 60,804 square feet, to be constructed so that no more than two of the three building dimensions in the vertical or horizontal planes are equal in length. The project's overall horizontal plane dimensions are approximately 207.5 feet along South Gulfview Boulevard and 276 feet along the north side, while the vertical plane is approximately 160 feet from grade to the top of the tallest roof. None of these dimensions are equal; 16. Beach by Design guidelines requires no plane or elevation to continue uninterrupted for greater than 100 feet without.an offset of more than five feet. The planes of all elevations provide in and out modulation of five — 10 feet, where the largest uninterrupted plane is approximately 29 feet; 17. Beach by Design guidelines requires at least 60 percent of any elevation to be covered with windows or architectural decoration. The applicant has calculated that the north elevation is at 62.6 percent, the east elevation at 70.7 percent, the south elevation at 66.1 percent and the west elevation at 68.8 percent; and 18. There are no outstanding Code Enforcement issues associated with the subject property. Community Development Board — January 15, 2008 FLD2007- 11034/TDR2005 -05022 — Page 13 of 15 0 0 Conclusions of Law: 1. That the development proposal is consistent with the Standards as per Tables 2 -801.1 and 2 -803 of the Community Development Code; 2. That the development proposal is consistent with the Flexibility criteria as per Section 2 -803.0 of the Community Development Code; 3. That the development proposal is consistent with the General Standards for Level Two Approvals as per Section 3 -913 of the Community Development Code; and 4. That the development proposal is consistent with the Design Guidelines of Beach by Design. Based upon the above, the Planning Department recommends APPROVAL of the (1) Termination of Status of Nonconformity for density (217 overnight accommodation units; where 93 overnight accommodation units are permitted today), under the provisions of Section 6 -109; (2) Flexible Development approval to permit 230 overnight accommodation units in the Tourist (T) District with reductions to the front (east) setback from 15 feet to zero feet (to trash staging area), reductions to the side (north) setback from the Coastal Construction Control Line (CCCL) from 10 feet to six feet (to building) and to zero feet (to sidewalk), reductions to the side (south) setback from 10 feet to three feet (to sidewalk) and to zero feet (to trash staging area), reductions to the rear (west) setback from the CCCL from 20 feet to eight feet (to building) and to zero feet (to sidewalk), an increase to building height from 35 feet to 100 feet (to roof deck) and to 150 feet (to roof deck) for two portions of the building, a deviation to allow direct access to an arterial street and to allow a two -year time frame to submit for a building permit, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2- 803.C; and (3) including the Transfer of Development Rights of eight total dwelling units (being converted to 13 overnight accommodation units) previously approved and transferred under TDR2005- 05022, including four dwelling units from 557 and 579 Cyprus Avenue, one dwelling unit from 625 -627 Bay Esplanade and three dwelling units from 667 Bay Esplanade, under the provisions of Section 4 -1402, with the following conditions: Conditions of Approval: 1. That application for a building permit to construct the approved project be submitted no later than January 15, 2010, unless time extensions are granted pursuant to Section 4 -407; 2. That the final design and color of the overnight accommodation building be consistent with the conceptual elevations submitted to, or as modified by, the CDB; 3. That the use of this property be for overnight accommodations, meeting the definition of the Community Development Code, with owner and guest stays not to exceed 30 days (whether occupancy of units arise from a rental agreement, other agreement or the payment of consideration). This development shall not be deemed attached dwellings with individual dwelling units, nor shall units qualify for homestead exemption or home or business occupational licenses; 4. That a Declaration of Unity of Title (for condominiums) be recorded in the public records prior to the issuance of any permits; 5. That a condominium or other form of plat be recorded prior to the issuance.of the building permit or first Certificate of Occupancy, depending on the form of the sale of the units, as necessary or required; 6. That there be no public /guest use of either roof; 7. That, prior to the issuance of any permits, waterfront visibility triangles be correctly indicated on the civil site and landscape plans; 8. That any future freestanding sign be a monument -style sign and be designed to match the exterior materials and color of the building. The maximum height shall be four feet, unless approved at six feet high through a Comprehensive Sign Program; Community Development Board — January 15, 2008 FLD2007- 11034/TDR2005 -05022 — Page 14 of 15 9. That sea - turtle friendly light fixtures be employed with the site design, with compliance demonstrated on plans acceptable to the Environmental Engineering Division, prior to the issuance of building permits; 10. That, prior to the issuance of any permits, the civil plans be amended to indicate the following: a. curbing of the edges of pavement for the trash staging /loading area; b. detailed perimeter grading to ensure proposed site grading of swales and yard grate inlets works with the proposed landscaping; and C. a stoop outside the double doors from the south side of the building adjacent to the trash holding room; 11. That, prior to the issuance of any permits, the civil and architectural plans be coordinated as to the location of mirrors and signage to aid motorists backing out of visually blocked parking spaces on all levels of the parking garage; 12. That, prior to the issuance of any permit, compliance with all requirements of General Engineering and Stormwater Engineering be met; 13. That all Fire Department requirements be met prior to the issuance of any permits; 14. That any applicable Public Art and Design Impact Fee be paid prior to the issuance of any permits; and 15. That all Parks and Recreation fees be paid prior to the issuance of any permits. Prepared by Planning Department Staff: Al atv'l M. Wayne M. W lls, AICP, Planner III ATTACHMENTS: ❑ Location Map ❑ Aerial Map ❑ Zoning Map ❑ Existing Surrounding Uses Map ❑ Photographs of Site and Vicinity S: (Planning Department)C D BIFLEX (FLD) (Pending casesl Up for the next CDkGulfview S 0430 CB Vacation (T) 1.15.08 CDB - WWIGulfview S 430 Staff Report.doc Community Development Board — January 15, 2008 FLD2007- 11034/TDR2005 -05022 — Page 15 of 15 • • m °a - PAPAYA ST � 4 AGE 2 �i w„ w 0 C.... Blvd WINDWARD S R ED FIRST ST PROJECT maag OFyDN DR ySyDB THIRD ST 'Q W D O SITE °a BRIGHT WATER DR FIFTH ST O� BAYSIDE � DR ( / &AV{YAY OgLVO er X A0 ss 4- O 4- C7 Location Map Owner: Salt Block 57, LLC i Cases: FLD2007 -1 1 034 TDR2005 -05022 Site: 430 South Gulfview Boulevard Property Size(Acres): 2.45 PIN: 07/29/15/52380/000 /0330 Atlas Page: 276A • I t V- f z e i 17 Ir " i4 f + £' 7— Aerial Map Owner: Salt Block 57, 1 Case. FLD2007 -11034 TD R2005- 05022 9e: 430 South C ulfvew 3ckAav:irJ Property 2.45 Size(Acres;: PIN: 07/29/15,152380/000/03330 Atlas PagE: 276A 0 0 134 — 1351 3�6 3 355 -- -- - - - - -1 Q 11253 \ 34 FIFTH ST o 14dT ---- - - - - -� r� -' - -- / - /- 1 --- 0 401-- 1 I 1 i �—, - -1 l 406 / 411 I % I I 40911 OS /R ' `-410 --- - - - - ^I 410 JI 415 I - - -- - -- -- - - 412 � 421 —= I 1 / 20 X431 i 1 -1 420 11 1 t— \ � _ A \ 1431 „�✓ � � 1�f� I yl ( `tap ��? � 0 / I I 430 bAb 1 / / app 445 I l L I j Zoning Map Owner: Salt Block 57, LLC Cases: FLD2007 -1 1034 TDR2005 -05022 Site: 430 South Gulfview Boulevard Property 2.45 Size(Acres): PIN: 07/29/15/52380/000 /0330 Atlas Page: 276A 0 0 26 - - - -- L 353\14 LI =a I O FjFT 26 112 -21 121 it O -- -j I I -I��1 Uv 27 1 / O 1 401 % / a otmn datio I --- -1 112 Qo 0 28 41, V L4os -2 / I -- -k- 74 I- I J I `409/1 I lI 12 29 75 I r$i� t i0' -,, -� Beach I % v� S �- 410 �c0- - 12 S Qmm I I' - `J 412 -- 126 I % l 8-420 4>5 - 31 - "�, I I 420 `t I 1,431 1 2 32 et '1 148,0 S 1431 1 _ 1\29'" /\ \` "„� L Q 80 4' -}�- -J 4 \30 1 ` \ 1 I 5 \\ 34 430 `� \ " " AA5 ; ��� cie OVejrM 133 IUwoI/ n S 36 AA) acco o q s 85 5 i Q56 \�J 445 - - -� I 9 ver ' J 88 ccoidino Mio -' Attac$ed dwellings �y° ti / 514/ / o -iJ Overnigb4, accompiodations Existing Surrounding Uses Map Owner: Salt Block 57, LLC Cases: FLD2007 -1 1034 TD R2005 -05022 Site: 430 South Gulfview Boulevard Property 2.45 Size (Acres): PIN: 07/29/15/52380/000 /0330 Atlas Page: 276A 0 0 View looking southwest at subject property View looking north along S. Gulfview Blvd at Beach Walk improvements (subject property on left) 430 South Gulfview Boulevard FLD2007- 11034/TDR2005 -05022 ate. View looking west at sidewalk on public beach directly north of subject property View of overnight accommodation use to the northeast of subject property across S. Gulfview Blvd. 1 of 2 0 0 View looking northeast at commercial uses across S. Gulfview Blvd. View looking southwest at 440/450 West condominiums to the southeast of subject property (proposed timeshare site in foreground right) View looking southeast at commercial uses across S. Gulfview Blvd. 430 South Gulfview Boulevard 2 of 2 FLD2007- 11034/TDR2005 -05022 11 C.1iMilif Conditions Associated With FLD2007 -11034 430 S GULFVIEW BLVD '1 Engineering Condition Steve Doherty 562 -4773 11/21/2007J Prior to Issuance of a Building Permit: Not Met 1. Sidewalk and driveway treatment shall be subject to the approval of a separate right -of -way permit. Contact Don Melone (727) 562 -4798 in Room #220 at the MSB (Municipal Services Building). 2. Brick paver driveways shall be constructed in compliance with Clearwater's Contract Specifications and Standards Index #116. 3. Provide a note or dimension on the plan indicating that the Fire Department Connection (FDC) shall be located no closer than 25 -feet and no further than 50 -feet from the nearest Fire Hydrant Assembly (FHA). 4. Need to provide sufficient evidence the fire flows will be adequate to support this development. 5. Ductile iron pipe shall be installed between any tap and water meter. Ductile iron pipe shall be installed between any tap and backflow preventor device. At least one joint of ductile iron pipe shall be installed on the service side of any backflow preventor device. 6. Storm sewer manhole cover(s) shall not have the words "Clearwater" or City of Clearwater" on them as the system is a private system. Please revise accordingly. 7. If the proposed use of the property includes a restaurant, show grease trap location on the plan. 8. Note: City of Clearwater Contract Specifications and standards Index 109 requires handicapped ramps to be constructed per F.D.O.T. Design Standards Index 304 with a truncated dome surface. 9. Applicant shall pay all applicable sewer and water impact fees. Prior to Issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy: 1. Applicant shall submit 5 sets of as -built drawings that are signed and sealed by a professional engineer or land surveyor registered in the State of Florida. Construction Services Inspector will field inspect as -built drawings for accuracy. General Note: If the proposed project necessitates infrastructure modifications to satisfy site - specific water capacity and pressure requirements and /or wastewater capacity requirements, the modifications shall be completed by the applicant and at their expense. If underground water mains and hydrants are to be installed, the installation shall be completed and in service prior to construction in accordance with Fire Department requirements. General Note: DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. Parks & Recs Condition - Chris Hubbard 11/16/2007 V The Public Art and Design Impact Fee is due and payable on this project prior to issuance of Not Met building permit. This fee could be substantial and it is recommended that you contact Chris Hubbard at 727 - 562 -4837 to calculate the assessment. 11/16/2007 1 Open space /recreation impact fees are due prior to issuance of building permits or final plat (if Not Met applicable) whichever occurs first. These fees could be substantial and it is recommended that you contact Art Kader at 727 - 562- 4824'to calculate the assessment. Storm Water Condition Phuong Vo 562 -4752 11/21/2007. The following shall be addressed prior to issuance of building permit. Not Met 1. Provide a SWFWMD permit or letter of exemption 2. Route all roof runoff to the vault. 3. Show type, size, and slope of drainage system located on the garage floors and around the site yard drain. Print Date: 01/08/2008 Page 1 of 3 CaseConditons FLD2007 -11034 430 S GULFVIEW BLVD 0 Storm Water Condition Phuong Vo 562 -4752 4. Show side swales and their cross sections. 5. Show proposed grade elevations through out the site. 6. Provide an operational and maintenance schedule of the vault. General note: 1. DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. 2. At building permit application, applicant shall submit all data again for review. Zoning Condition Wayne Wells, AICP 727- 562 -4504 11/28/2007 / 1/8/08 - WW Not Met v Waterfront visibility triangles still drawn incorrectly, Include as a condition of approval in the Staff Report. 12/20/07 - WW Waterfront visibility triangles drawn incorrectly (wrong dimensions). Look at Section 3 -904.6 again for the dimensions and angle to use. Condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: That the fence construction beyond the CCCL will require approval from the State DEP prior to issuance of the building permit. 11/28/07 - WW Sheet L -1 - Section 3- 804.C.1 and Section 3 -904.13 only permits a maximum of a three -foot high non - opaque fence within the required setback for waterfront property (which this is) and within waterfront visibility triangles. Revise proposed 4 - 6 foot high fences to a maximum three feet height along the west top of seawall and the southwest and northwest corners of the property. Fence along seawall is also seaward of the CCCL and will require State approval. 12/04/2007 1/8/07 - WW Not Met Need to coordinate civil and architectural sheets for location of mirrors. Include as a condition of approval in staff report. 12/23/07 - WW On all appropriate sheets, show mirrors or other devices to aid the motorist when backing out blind. Signs in front of the spaces telling the motorist to use the mirrors are also required: Parking Level 1 - Spaces 13, 14, 61 and 62; Parking Level 2 - Spaces 16, 17, 66, 67, 68 and 69; Parking Level 3 - Sppces 52, 53, 54, 55, 71 and 72. 12/4/07 - WW Sheets 3/13, 4/13, 5/15, A2.101, A2.102 and A2.103 - On Parking Levels 1, 2 and 3, there are many parking spaces adjacent to solid walls for rooms, stairwells, etc., that block the view of motorists when backing out (backing out blind into the drive aisle). Need to provide mirrors or other devices at all of these spaces to aid motorists. Show on plans the locations of such mirrors or other devices. 12/04/2007 f 1/8/08 - WW Not Met Ensure curbing is correctly shown and located on plans prior to building permit. Include as a condition of approval in the staff report. 12/20/07 - WW Show curbing on Sheets 3/13 and 7/13 (see L -1). 12/4/07 - WW Sheet 3/13 - Note #2 at bottom of page - Rather than header curb, do you mean straight curb, as shown in the detail on Sheet 11/13? Show curbing on both sides of all three driveways on Sheets / 3/13, 7/13 and L -1. 12/04/2007 `' 1/8/08 - WW Not Met Y See response sheet. Include as a condition of approval in the staff report. 12/20/07 & 12/4/07 - WW Sheet 7/13 - Provide existing and proposed grade elevations throughout the site now, so that one Print Date: 01/08/2008 Page 2 of 3 CaseConditons FLD2007 -11034 430 S GULFVIEW BLVD Zoning Condition Wayne Wells, AICP 727 - 562 -4504 can see how the landscaping is working with site drainage.. 5/200 1/8/08,12/23/07 & 12/5/07 - WW Not Met Transfer of Development Rights - Submitted warranty deeds will be forwarded to Leslie Dougall -Sides to determine if properly written and recorded. If there are issues, will contact you with the issues and how to correct. 12/20/2007 1/8/08 - WW Not Met Show stoop on all plans prior to issuance of building permit. Include as a condition of approval in the staff report. 12/20/07 - WW Sheets 3/13, L -1, L -2, IR -1 & A2.101 - There are double doors to the exterior shown west of the trash holding room that lead out to landscaping. Unclear as to the purpose of these doors. Suggest removal. 12/21/2007 1/8/08 & 12/21/07 - WW Not Met Condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: That there be no public /guest use of either roof; 12/21/2007 J 1/8/08 & 12/21/07 - WW Not Met Condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: That application for building permits be submitted no later than January 15, 2010, unless time extensions are granted pursuant to Code provisions; Print Date: 01/08/2008 Page 3 of 3 CaseConditons • Wells, Wayne From: Watkins, Sherry Sent: Friday, December 28, 2007 10:21 AM To: Gilmore, Stephanie Cc: Wells, Wayne Subject: Ad for 430 S. Gulfview Blvd. Stephanie - Looks good. "Go ahead" with advertising Wayne - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Gilmore, Stephanie Sent: Friday, December 28, 2007 10:18 AM To: Watkins, Sherry Subject: Importance: High << File: FLD2007- 11034- TDR2005- 05022, 430 S. Gulfview Blvd.doc >> Stephanie Gilmore City Clerk Specialist Office of Official Records & Legislative Services Phone: (727) 562 -4227 Fax: (727) 562 - 4086 Email: Stephanie .Gilmore @myclearwater.com • • • Wells, Wayne From: Watkins, Sherry Sent: Friday, December 28, 2007 10:21 AM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: FW: Importance: High - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Gilmore, Stephanie Sent: Friday, December 28, 2007 10:18 AM To: Watkins, Sherry Subject: Importance: High ® -ky •...;': FLD2007 -1103 DR2005- 05022, Stephanie Gilmore City Clerk Specialist Office of Official Records & Legislative Services Phone: (727) 562 -4227 Fax: (727) 562 - 4086 Email: Stephanie .Gilmore @myclearwater.com CITY OF CLEARWATER NOTICE OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD PUBLIC HEARINGS The Community Development Board of the City of Clearwater, Florida, will hold a public hearing on Tuesday, January 15, 2008, beginning at 1:00 pm, in the City Council Chambers, in City Hall, 3rd floor, 112 South Osceola Ave, Clearwater, Florida, to consider the following requests: NOTE: All persons wishing to address an item need to be present at the BEGINNING of the meeting Those cases that are not contested by the applicant, staff, neighboring property owners etc. will be placed on a consent agenda and. approved by a single vote at the beginning of the meeting. Salt Block 57 LLC, formerly owned by Indigo Beach, LLC, formerly known as TW /Beach Residences — Clearwater, LLC. (E.D. Armstrong III, Esq. and Johnson, Pope, Bokor, Ruppel & Burns, LLP) are requesting (1) Termination of Status of Nonconformity for density (217 overnight accommodation units; where 93 overnight accommodation units are permitted today), under the provisions of Section 6 -109; (2) Flexible Development approval to permit 230 overnight accommodation units in the Tourist (T) District with reductions to the front (east) setback from 15 feet to zero feet (to trash staging area), reductions to the side (north) setback from the Coastal Construction Control Line (CCCL) from 10 feet to 6 feet (to building) and to zero feet (to sidewalk), reductions to the side (south) setback from 10 feet to 3 feet (to sidewalk) and to zero feet (to trash staging area), reductions to the rear (west) setback from the CCCL from 20 feet to 8 feet (to building) and to zero feet (to sidewalk), an increase to building height from 35 feet to 100 feet (to roof deck) and to 150 feet (to roof deck) for two portions of the building, a deviation to allow direct access to an arterial street and to allow a two -year time frame to submit for a building permit, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Sec 2- 803.C; and (3) including the Transfer of Development Rights of 8 total dwelling units (being converted to 13 overnight accommodation units) previously approved and transferred under TDR2005- 05022, including four dwelling units from 557 and 579 Cyprus Ave, one dwelling unit from 625- 627 Bay Esplanade and 3 dwelling units from 667 Bay Esplanade, under the provisions of Sec 4 -1402. (Proposed Use: 230 Overnight Accommodation units) at 430 South Gulfview Blvd, Lloyd- White- Skinner Sub Lots 33, 34 & 35 & pt of lot 36 & Subm Land on W per O.R. 765/542 All Desc . Assigned Planner: Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Planner III. FLD2007- 11034/TDR2005 -05022 Interested parties may appear and be heard at the hearing or file written notice of approval or objection with the Planning Director or City Clerk prior to the hearing. Any person who decides to appeal any decision made by the Board or Council, with respect to any matter considered at such hearings, will need to request a record of the proceedings and, for such purpose, may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based per Florida Statute 286.0105. Community Development Code Sec 4 -206 states that party status shall be granted by the Board in quasi - judicial cases if the person requesting such status demonstrates that s /he is substantially affected. Party status entitles parties to personally testify, present evidence, argument and witnesses, cross - examine witnesses, appeal the decision and speak on reconsideration requests, and needs to be requested and obtained during the case discussion before the CDB. An oath will be administered swearing in all persons giving testimony in quasi - judicial public hearing cases. If you wish to speak at the meeting, please wait to be recognized, then state and spell your name and provide your address. Persons without party status speaking before the CDB shall be limited to three minutes unless an individual is representing a group in which case the Chairperson may authorize a reasonable amount of time up to 10 minutes. Five days prior to the meeting, staff reports and recommendations on the above requests will be available for review by interested parties between the hours of 8:30 a.m. and 4:30 p.m., weekdays, at the City of Clearwater, Planning Department, 100 S. Myrtle Ave., Clearwater, FL 33756. Please contact the case presenter, at 562 -4567 to discuss any questions or concerns about the project and /or to better understand the proposal and review the site plan. Michael Delk Cynthia E. Goudeau, MMC Planning Director City Clerk City of Clearwater P.O. Box 4748, Clearwater, FL 33758 -4748 NOTE: Applicant or representative must be present at the hearing. YOU ARE BEING SENT THIS NOTICE IF YOU ARE THE APPLICANT OR OWN PROPERTY WITHIN 200 FT OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY A COPY OF THIS AD IN LARGE PRINT IS AVAILABLE IN OFFICIAL RECORDS AND LEGISLATIVE SERVICES. ANY PERSON WITH A DISABILITY REQUIRING REASONABLE ACCOMMODATION IN ORDER TO PARTICIPATE IN THIS MEETING SHOULD CALL (727) 562 -4093 WITH THEIR REQUEST. To learn more about presenting to Clearwater boards and City Council, go to http: / /clearwater granicus.comNiewPublisher.php ?view id =11 and click on "Resident Engagement Video." You can also check the informational video out from any Clearwater public library. Ad: 01/03/08 Page 1 of 2 Wells, Wayne From: Bruch, Tracey Sent: Friday, December 28, 2007 10:01 AM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: FW: Indigo Beach /City of Clearwater fyi Tracey Bruch, CAPP Parking Manager (727) 562 -4771 tracey.bruch @myclearwater.com - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Stephen Kussner [mailto:SKussner @gray- robinson.com] Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2007 4:45 PM To: Rice, Scott Cc: bob .glantz @us.taylorwoodrow.com; Elaine.Stulic @us.taylorwoodrow.com; ncc7744 @aol.com; PWolf @morrisonhomes.com; Bruch, Tracey; Lipowski, Laura; Quillen, Michael; Soto, Camilo Subject: RE: Indigo Beach /City of Clearwater you will need to speak with the Buyer. the attorneys e-mail is ncc7744aaol.com Stephen Kussner GrayRobinson, P.A. 201 North Franklin Street, Suite 2200 P.O. Box 3324 (33601 -3324) Tampa, Florida 33602 Main: 813 - 273 -5000 1 Fax: 813 - 273 -5145 Direct: 813- 273 -5296 1 GRAY I ROBINSON ATTORNEYS AT LAW This e-mail is intended only for the individual(s) or entity(s) named within the message. This e-mail might contain legally privileged and confidential information. If you properly received this e-mail as a client or retained expert, please hold it in confidence to protect the attorney - client or work product privileges. Should the intended recipient forward or disclose this message to another person or party, that action could constitute a waiver of the attorney- client privilege. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the agent responsible to deliver it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is prohibited by the sender and to do so might constitute a violation of the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. section 2510 -2521. If this communication was,received in error we apologize for the intrusion. Please notify us by reply e-mail and delete the original message without reading same. Nothing in this e-mail message shall, in and of itself, create an attorney - client relationship with the sender. Disclaimer under Circular 230: Any statements regarding tax matters made herein, including any attachments, are not formal tax opinions by this firm, cannot be relied upon or used by any person to avoid tax penalties, and are not intended to be used or referred to in any marketing or promotional materials. 12/28/2007 A-A �s � � Page 2 of 2 From: Scott.Rice @myClearwater.com [ maiIto :Scott.Rice @myClearwater.com] Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2007 1:48 PM To: Stephen Kussner Cc: bob.glantz @us.taylorwoodrow.com; Elaine.Stulic @us.taylorwoodrow.com; ncc7744 @aol.com; PWolf@ morrison homes. com; Tracey.Bruch @myClearwater.com; Laura .Lipowski @myClearwater.com; Michael .Quillen @myClearwater.com; Camilo.Soto @MyClearwater.com Subject: RE: Indigo Beach /City of Clearwater I understand the subject property was sold to Salt Block 57, LLC on 12/21/07. Will you still be pursuing the Air Rights & Access Agreement? D. Scott Rice, PE Assistant Engineering Director City of Clearwater (727) 562 -4781 - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Stephen Kussner [mailto:SKussner @gray- robinson.com] Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2007 4:20 PM To: Rice, Scott Cc: bob.glantz @us.taylorwoodrow.com; Elaine A. Stulic; ncc7744 @aol.com; Phil Wolf Subject: Indigo Beach /City of Clearwater Enclosed is the revised Temporary Air Rights and Access Easement Agreement and Temporary Parking Lot Lease. By copy of this letter we are forwarding these documents to our client for review and approval. We reserve the right to make further changes after our client has reviewed the same. We look forward to hearing from you in this matter. 12/28/2007 Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Friday, December 28, 2007 9:45 AM To: Fresk, Sheryl Subject: Map Request The aerial map is outdated and a newer aerial view would show the building on the subject property gone and probably the changed configuration of Coronado Drive, Hamden Drive and S. Gulfview Blvd. due to Beach Walk construction.. That's all I am looking for in an updated aerial map for this case, something that is closer to today's situation. If you need the prior case number that I copied this aerial map from, it is FLD2005- 05047/TDR2005- 05022. Thanks. - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Fresk, Sheryl Sent: Friday, December 28, 2007 9:10 AM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: Hi Wayne, you sent Jason Herman a request for an updated map on December 24th. I'm not clear on what you want updated. Is this a map request that has already been done and something has changed on it... Sheryl A. Fresk City of Clearwater Engineering Department (727)562 -4763 Wells, Wayne From: Fresk, Sheryl Sent: Friday, December 28, 2007 10:54 AM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: Map Name u aerial.doc I forgot to highlight the parcel on the last map, sorry. The parcel is highlighted on this one. VIrssage Page 1 of 2 Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2007 2:23 PM To: Watkins, Sherry Cc: Clayton, Gina Subject: FW: FLD2007 -11034 - 430 S. Gulfview - Change of Ownership Importance: High Sherry - I have changed the CDB agenda appropriately for this case. Wayne - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Call, Rosemarie Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2007 12:41 PM To: Dougall- Sides, Leslie; Wells, Wayne Subject: FW: FLD2007 -11034 - 430 S. Gulfview - Change of Ownership Importance: High Leslie - I met with Katie Cole and Jayne Sears this morning to review the file. Regarding the change of ownership - Katie had mentioned adding "subsequent ownership" after the listed applicant. Practice has been to include name of new owner after the applicant. Please advise. A couple of things came up that are being worked out with Planning (trying to have it resolved by end of today): 1) reductions to the rear (west) setback: would like to change from 8.3 ft to 8.0 ft 2) use of timeshare /interval ownership: they wish to strike mention of Wayne - re the items they are trying to resolve today, please advise if any changes will occur. We will need to re- print the notices and submit the ad by 10:00 am tomorrow morning to meet all advertising requirements. Thank you. Rosemarie - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Jayne E. Sears [mailto:JayneS @jpfirm.com] Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2007 10:39 AM To: Call, Rosemarie Cc: Katie Cole Subject: FW: FLD2007 -11034 - 430 S. Gulfview - Change of Ownership Attached is the recorded deed and below is the email notification of the sale. Thank you for all of your help. Jayne E. Sears Legal Assistant Johnson, Pope, Bokor, Ruppel & Burns, LLP 911 Chestnut Street Clearwater, FL 33756 Phone: (727) 461 -1818 Fax: (727) 462 -0365 - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Jayne E. Sears Sent: Wednesday, December 26, 2007 1:26 PM To: 'Wayne.Wells @myClearwater.com' 12/27/2007 X"Imssage Page 2 of 2 Cc: Michael L. Delk (michael.delk @myclearwater.com); Gina.Clayton @myClearwater.com; Leslie.Dougall- Sides@ myClearwater.com; Ed Armstrong; Katie Cole; 'debhoward @opl hotels. com'; 'Mike Chatham'; Chuck Jones; Cyndi Tarapani; '0 Cabrera'; Hunter Booth (hbooth @pgcla.com) Subject:.FLD2007 -11034 - 430 S. Gulfview - Change of Ownership Wayne, thank you for your emails concerning this case being set for the Jan. 15 CDB meeting. We are working on the additional responses /revised plans that you require by Jan. 7 and expect to have everything in order. Regarding Planning Comment 14 (transfer of development rights), we need to know if there are any issues or comments to which we need to respond. On behalf of the applicant, we hereby notify the City as follows: The land which is the subject of this request was sold on Friday, December 21 to Salt Block 57, L.L.C., a Utah limited liability company. Attached is a copy of the recorded deed. We will provide you with an affidavit of the new owner authorizing Ed Armstrong and Johnson, Pope law firm as representatives. Please let us know what other items are required by the City as a result of the sale. For example, if the first page of the application should be revised to indicate a new applicant and owner. Jayne E. Sears Legal Assistant Johnson, Pope, Bokor, Ruppel & Burns, LLP 911 Chestnut Street Clearwater, FL 33756 Phone: (727) 461 -1818 Fax: (727) 462 -0365 12/27/2007 From: Dougall- Sides, Leslie Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2007 1:51 PM To: Call, Rosemarie; Wells, Wayne Subject: RE: FLD2007 -1 1034 - 430 S. Gulfview - Change of Ownership It is preferable to specify the name of the new owner if available... Also on timeshare /interval ownership I am o.k. with omitting as long as the application is still descriptive of what the use will be. - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Call, Rosemarie Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2007 12:41 PM To: Dougall- Sides, Leslie; Wells, Wayne Subject: FW: FLD2007 -11034 - 430 S. Gulfview - Change of Ownership Importance: High Leslie - I met with Katie Cole and Jayne Sears this morning to review the file. Regarding the change of ownership - Katie had mentioned adding "subsequent ownership" after the listed applicant. Practice has been to include name of new owner after the applicant. Please advise. A couple of things came up that are being worked out with Planning (trying to have it resolved by end of today): 1) reductions to the rear (west) setback: would like to change from 8.3 ft to 8.0 ft 2) use of timeshare /interval ownership: they wish to strike mention of Wayne - re the items they are trying to resolve today, please advise if any changes will occur. We will need to re -print the notices and submit the ad by 10:00 am tomorrow morning to meet all advertising requirements. Thank you. Rosemarie - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Jayne E. Sears [mailto:JayneS @jpfirm.com] Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2007 10:39 AM To: Call, Rosemarie Cc: Katie Cole Subject: FW: FLD2007 -11034 - 430 S. Gulfview - Change of Ownership Attached is the recorded deed and below is the email notification of the sale. Thank you for all of your help. Jayne E. Sears Legal Assistant Johnson, Pope, Bokor, Ruppel & Burns, LLP 911 Chestnut Street Clearwater, FL 33756 Phone: (727) 461 -1818 Fax: (727) 462 -0365 - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Jayne E. Sears 12/27/2007 (essage Page 2 of 2 Sent: Wednesday, December 26, 2007 1:26 PM To: 'Wayne.Wells @myClearwater.com' Cc: Michael L. Delk (michael.delk @myclearwater.com); Gina.Clayton @myClearwater.com; Leslie.Dougall- Sides@ myClearwater.com; Ed Armstrong; Katie Cole; 'debhoward @opl hotels. com'; 'Mike Chatham'; Chuck Jones; Cyndi Tarapani; 'O Cabrera'; Hunter Booth (hbooth @pgcla.com) Subject: FLD2007 -11034 - 430 S. Gulfview - Change of Ownership Wayne, thank you for your emails concerning this case being set for the Jan. 15 CDB meeting. We are working on the additional responses /revised plans that you require by Jan. 7 and expect to have everything in order. Regarding Planning Comment 14 (transfer of development rights), we need to know if there are any issues or comments to which we need to respond. On behalf of the applicant, we hereby notify the City as follows: The land which is the subject of this request was sold on Friday, December 21 to Salt Block 57, L.L.C., a Utah limited liability company. Attached is a copy of the recorded deed. We will provide you with an affidavit of the new owner authorizing Ed Armstrong and Johnson, Pope law firm as representatives. Please let us know what other items are required by the City as a result of the sale. For example, if the first page of the application should be revised to indicate a new applicant and owner. Jayne E. Sears Legal Assistant Johnson, Pope, Bokor, Ruppel & Burns, LLP 911 Chestnut Street Clearwater, FL 33756 Phone: (727) 461 -1818 Fax: (727) 462 -0365 12/27/2007 ' __ ,sage Page 1 of 2 Wells, Wayne From: Call, Rosemarie Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2007 12:41 PM To: Dougall- Sides, Leslie; Wells, Wayne Subject: FW: FLD2007 -11034 - 430 S. Gulfview - Change of Ownership Importance: High Leslie - I met with Katie Cole and Jayne Sears this morning to review the file. Regarding the change of ownership - Katie had mentioned adding "subsequent ownership" after the listed applicant. Practice has been to include name of new owner after the applicant. Please advise. A couple of things came up that are being worked out with Planning (trying to have it resolved by end of today): 1) reductions to the rear (west) setback: would like to change from 8.3 ft to 8.0 ft 2) use of timeshare /interval ownership: they wish to strike mention of . Wayne - re the items they are trying to resolve today, please advise if any changes will occur. We will need to re- print the notices and submit the ad by 10:00 am tomorrow morning to meet all advertising requirements. Thank you. Rosemarie - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Jayne E. Sears [mailto:JayneS @jpfirm.com] Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2007 10:39 AM To: Call, Rosemarie Cc: Katie Cole Subject: FW: FLD2007 -11034 - 430 S. Gulfview - Change of Ownership Attached is the recorded deed and below is the email notification of the sale. Thank you for all of your help. Jayne E. Sears Legal Assistant Johnson, Pope, Bokor, Ruppel & Burns, LLP 911 Chestnut Street Clearwater, FL 33756 Phone: (727) 461 -1818 Fax: (727) 462 -0365 - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Jayne E. Sears Sent: Wednesday, December 26, 2007 1:26 PM To: 'Wayne.Wells @myClearwater.com' Cc: Michael L. Delk ( michael.delk @myclearwater.com); Gina.Clayton @myClearwater.com; Leslie.Dougall- Sides@myClearwater.com; Ed Armstrong; Katie Cole; 'debhoward @oplhotels.com'; 'Mike Chatham'; Chuck Jones; Cyndi Tarapani; 'O Cabrera'; Hunter Booth (hbooth @pgcla.com) Subject: FLD2007 -11034 - 430 S. Gulfview - Change of Ownership Wayne, thank you for your emails concerning this case being set for the Jan. 15 CDB meeting. We are working on the additional responses /revised plans that you require by Jan. 7 and expect to have everything in order. Regarding Planning Comment 14 (transfer of development rights), we need to know if there are any issues or comments to which we need to respond. On behalf of the applicant, we hereby notify the City as follows: 12/27/2007 issage Page 2 of 2 The land which is the subject of this request was sold on Friday, December 21 to Salt Block 57, L.L.C., a Utah limited liability company. Attached is'a copy of the recorded deed. We will provide you with an affidavit of the new owner authorizing Ed Armstrong and Johnson, Pope law firm as representatives. Please let us know what other items are required by the City as a result of the sale. For example, if the first page of the application should be revised to indicate a new applicant and owner. Jayne E. Sears Legal Assistant Johnson, Pope, Bokor, Ruppel & Burns, LLP 911 Chestnut Street Clearwater, FL 33756 Phone: (727) 461 -1818 Fax: (727) 462 -0365 12/27/2007 3p ¢; Message Page 1 of 2 Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Wednesday, December 26, 2007 4:19 PM To: Dougall- Sides, Leslie Cc: Thompson, Neil; Delk, Michael Subject: RE: A04 -01420 : FW: FLD2007 -11034 - 430 S. Gulfview - Change of Ownership IblNumAttach: 1 MessageGUID: {E760E849- 1494 -4AEE- 8084- E5D8C319EBBF} OriginalDate: None Originator: SQL Style: Planning General miscellaneous . Leslie - I have advised Jayne to make the changes in the application and the Affidavit to Authorize Agent and that I will later make the revisions in the agenda and staff report as to the ownership change, since the advertisement has I believe already been sent to the newspaper. There will be some other clarifications I will deal with in the staff report. You should be able to find the FLD case under 430 S. Gulfview Blvd. and by case number. As to Planning Comment 14, 1 will send to you this week a request to review their TDR warranty deeds for conformance with Code requirements, much as I have done on other projects. Technically, the transfer must be accomplished prior to issuance of the building permit, so we could place a condition on this case. Wayne - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Dougall- Sides, Leslie Sent: Wednesday, December 26, 2007 3:54 PM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: A04 -01420 : FW: FLD2007 -11034 - 430 S. Gulfview - Change of Ownership Importance: High Wayne, I believe the application should be revised to indicate the new owner /applicant. Also, I am not finding this case on a query as to either address or case no. in Tidemark. Is there anything further that needs to occur re Planning Comment 14? Leslie - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Jayne E. Sears [mailto:JayneS @jpfirm.com] Sent: Wednesday, December 26, 2007 1:26 PM To: Wells, Wayne Cc: Delk, Michael; Clayton, Gina; Dougall- Sides, Leslie; Ed Armstrong; Katie Cole; 'debhoward @o pi hotels.com'; 'Mike Chatham'; Chuck Jones; Cyndi Tarapani; 'O Cabrera'; Hunter Booth (hbooth @pgcla.com) Subject: FLD2007 -11034 - 430 S. Gulfview - Change of Ownership Wayne, thank you for your emails concerning this case being set for the Jan. 15 CDB meeting. We are 12/26/2007 *Tessage Page 2 of 2 working on the additional responses /revised plans that you require by Jan. 7 and expect to have everything in order. Regarding Planning Comment 14 (transfer of development rights), we need to know if there are any issues or comments to which we need to respond. On behalf of the applicant, we hereby notify the City as follows: The land which is the subject of this request was sold on Friday, December 21 to Salt Block 57, L.L.C., a Utah limited liability company. Attached is a copy of the recorded deed. We will provide you with an affidavit of the new owner authorizing Ed Armstrong and Johnson, Pope law firm as representatives. Please let us know what other items are required by the City as a result of the sale. For example, if the first page of the application should be revised to indicate a new applicant and owner. Jayne E. Sears Legal Assistant Johnson, Pope, Bokor, Ruppel & Burns, LLP 911 Chestnut Street Clearwater, FL 33756 Phone: (727) 461 -1818 Fax: (727) 462 -0365 12/26/2007 Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Monday, December 24, 2007 7:58 AM To: Herman, Jason Subject: Map Request Jason - I have copied maps previously prepared for this same site from 2005. Could you update the attached aerial map by Friday, January 4, 2008? All other maps are okay. Thanks. Wayne � i Aerial Map.doc 5 A PLC.. 1005 am Case Number: FLD2007- 11034 -- 430 S GULFVIEW BLVD Owner(s): T W /Beach Residences- Clearwate 877 Executive Center Dr St Petersburg, F133702 ,4- TELEPHONE: No Phone, FAX: No Fax, E -MAIL: No Email Representative: E. D. Armstrong Iii, Esquire I Z o Z 3. 07 Po Box 1368 Clearwater, F133757 TELEPHONE: 727 - 461 -1818, FAX: 727 - 441 -8617, E -MAIL: jaynes @jpfirm.com Location: 2.45 total acres (1.87 acres zoned Tourist District; 0.58 acres zoned Open Space/Recreation District) located on the west side of South Gulfview Boulevard approximately 500 feet northwest of Hamden Drive and directly south of Clearwater Beach Atlas Page: 276A Zoning District: T, Tourist Request: (1) Termination of Status of Nonconformity for density (217 overnight accommodation units; where 93 overnight accommodation units are permitted today), under the provisions of Section 6 -109; (2) Flexible Development approval to permit 230 overnight accommodation units (timeshare /interval ownership) in the Tourist (T) District with reductions to the front (east) setback from 15 feet to zero feet .(to trash staging area), reductions to the side (north) setback from the Coastal Construction Control Line (CCCL) from 10 feet to 7.3 feet (to building) and to zero feet (to sidewalk), reductions to the side (south) setback from 10 feet to three feet (to sidewalk) and to zero feet (to trash staging area), reductions to the rear (west) setback from the CCCL from 20 feet to 8.3 feet (to building) and to zero feet (to sidewalk), an increase to building height from 35 feet to 99.33 feet (to roof deck) and to 150 feet (to roof deck) for two portions of the building, a deviation to allow direct access to an arterial street and to allow a two -year time frame to submit for a building permit, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2- 803.C; and (3) including the Transfer of Development Rights of eight total dwelling units (being converted to 13 overnight accommodation units) previously approved and transferred under TDR2005- 05022, including four dwelling units from 557 and 579 Cyprus Avenue, one dwelling unit from 625 -627 Bay Esplanade and three dwelling units from 667 Bay Esplanade, under the provisions of Section 4 -1402. Proposed Use: Overnight accommodations Neighborhood Clearwater Beach Association Association(s): Clearwater, Fl 33767 100 Devon Dr TELEPHONE: 443 -2168, FAX: No Fax, E -MAIL: papamurphy @aol.com Neighborhood Clearwater Neighborhoods Coalition Association(s): Clearwater, F133758 P O Box 8204 TELEPHONE: No Phone, FAX: No Fax, E -MAIL: No Email Presenter: Wayne Wells, Planner III Attendees Included: City: Wayne Wells,Neil Thompson,Scott Rice,Steve Doherty,Jim Keller,Tom Glenn Applicant: Ed Armstrong,Steve Williamson,Jayne Sears, O.C. Cabrera,Cyndi Tarapani,Hunter Booth,Mike Chatham,Robert Glantz,Chuck Jones,Alan Ciklin Guest: Samuel Vasquez The DRC reviewed this application with the following comments: General Engineering: Development Review Agenda - Thursday, December 6, 2007 - Page 7 Prior to Issuance of a Building Permit:. • 1. Sidewalk and driveway treatment shall be subject to the approval of a separate right -of -way permit. Contact Don Melone (727) 562 -4798 in Room #220 at the MSB (Municipal Services Building). 2. Brick paver driveways shall be constructed in compliance with Clearwater's Contract Specifications and Standards Index #116. 3. Provide a note or dimension on the plan indicating that the Fire Department Connection (FDC) shall be located no closer than 25 -feet and no further than 50 -feet from the nearest Fire Hydrant Assembly (FHA). 4. Need to provide sufficient evidence the fire flows will be adequate to support this development 5. Ductile iron pipe shall be installed between any tap and water meter. Ductile iron pipe shall be installed between any tap and backflow preventor device. At least one joint of ductile iron pipe shall be installed on the service side of any backflow preventor device. 6. Storm sewer manhole cover(s) shall not have the words "Clearwater" or City of Clearwater" on them as the system is a private system. Please revise accordingly. 7. If the proposed use of the property includes a restaurant, show grease trap location on the plan. 8. Note: City of Clearwater Contract Specifications and standards Index 109 requires handicapped ramps to be constructed per F.D.O.T. Design Standards Index 304 with a truncated dome surface. 9. Applicant shall pay all applicable sewer and water impact fees. Prior to Issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy: 1. Applicant shall submit 5 sets of as -built drawings that are signed and sealed by a professional engineer or land surveyor registered in the State of Florida. Construction Services Inspector will field inspect as -built drawings for accuracy. General Note: If the proposed project necessitates infrastructure modifications to satisfy . site - specific water capacity and pressure requirements and/or wastewater capacity requirements, the modifications shall be completed by the applicant and at their expense. If underground water mains and hydrants are to be installed, the installation shall be completed and in service prior to construction in accordance with Fire Department requirements. General Note: DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. Environmental: No Comments Fire: No Comments Harbor Master: No Comments Legal: No Comments Land Resources: No Comments Landscaping: No Comments Parks and Recreation: 1 . The Public Art and Design Impact Fee is due and payable on this project prior to issuance of building permit. This fee could be substantial and it is recommended that you contact Chris Hubbard at 727 -562 -4837 to calculate the assessment. 2. Open space /recreation impact fees are due prior to issuance of building permits or final plat (if applicable) whichever occurs first. These fees could be substantial and it is recommended that you contact Art Kader at 727 -562 -4824 to calculate the assessment. Stormwater: Development Review Agenda - Thursday, December 6, 2007 - Page 8 1 . The following shall be addressed prior to issuance of building per• 1. Provide a SWFWMD permit or letter of exemption 2. Route all roof runoff to the vault. 3. Show type, size, and slope of drainage system located on the garage floors and around the site yard drain. 4. Show side swales and their cross sections. 5. Show proposed grade elevations through out the site. 6. Provide an operational and maintenance schedule of the vault. General note: 1. DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. 2. At building permit application, applicant shall submit all data again for review. Solid Waste: No Comments Traffic Engineering: No Comments Planning: Development Review Agenda - Thursday, December 6, 2007 - Page 9 2 4 12/21/07 - WW • • Sheet 3/13 and architectural sheets - On the north and west sides, the setbacks need to be indicated from the Coastal Construction Control Line (CCCL). 11/28/07 - WW Sheet 3/13 - Show on the site plan the location and setback from the property lines of the exterior of the building structure for the timeshare floors, the balconies and the eaves. Setbacks apply to all structures, whether at grade or in the air. Reality is that the setbacks indicated are inaccurate. Show actual setbacks. Balconies and eaves can only encroach into required setbacks in accordance with the provisions of Section 3 -908. 12/20/07 - WW Waterfront visibility triangles drawn incorrectly (wrong dimensions). Look at Section 3 -904.B again for the dimensions and angle to use. Condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: That the fence construction beyond the CCCL will require approval from the State DEP prior to issuance of the building permit. 11/28/07 - WW Sheet L -1 - Section 3- 804.C.1 and Section 3 -904.B only permits a maximum of a three -foot high non - opaque fence within the required setback for waterfront property (which this is) and within waterfront visibility triangles. Revise proposed 4 - 6 foot high fences to a maximum three feet height along the west top of seawall and the-southwest and northwest corners of the property. Fence along seawall is also seaward of the CCCL and will require State approval. 12/23/07 & 12/4/07 - WW Sheet 1/13 - Land Use Data - Based on other Planning comments, revise all proposed setbacks. Those indicated on this sheet are inaccurate or are not specific as to what the proposed setback is for. Reminder - Per Section 3- 905.A, required setbacks to be measured to all structures from the CCCL. 12/23/07 - WW On all appropriate sheets, show mirrors or other devices to aid the motorist when backing out blind. Signs in front of the spaces telling the motorist to use the mirrors are also required: Parking Level 1 - Spaces 13, 14, 61 and 62; Parking Level 2 - Spaces 16, 17, 66, 67, 68 and 69; Parking Level 3 - Sppces 52, 53, 54, 55, 71 and 72. 12/4/07 - WW Sheets 3/13, 4/13, 5/15, A2.101, A2.102 and A2.103 - On Parking Levels 1, 2 and 3, there are many parking spaces adjacent to solid walls for rooms, stairwells, etc., that block the view of motorists when backing out (backing out blind into the drive aisle). Need to provide mirrors or other devices at all of these spaces to aid motorists. Show on plans the locations of such mirrors or other devices. 12/20/07 - WW Show curbing on Sheets 3/13 and 7/13 (see L -1). 12/4/07 - WW Sheet 3/13 - Note #2 at bottom of page - Rather than header curb, do you mean straight curb, as shown in the detail on Sheet 11/13? Show curbing on both sides of all three driveways on Sheets 3/13, 7/13 and L -1. 12/20/07 - WW Sheet 3/13 - Revise service room and add trash room as shown on Sheet A2.101. 12/4/07 - WW Sheets 3/13 and A2.101 - There should be at least one door into the service room within the lobby area. 12/20/07 - WW Sheets 3 & 4/13 - Revise columns per Sheets A2.101 and A2.102. 12/4/07 - WW Sheets 3/13, A2. 101, A2.102 and A2.103 - Two columns on southern most end of parking rows south of ramp (northeast of southwestern stairwell) encroach into the required 24 -foot wide north/south drive aisle. Revise. 12/20/07 & 12/4/07 - WW Sheet 7/13 - Provide existing and proposed grade elevations throughout the site now, so that one can see how the landscaping is working with site drainage. Development Review Agenda - Thursday, December 6, 2007 - Page 10 9 . 12/21/07 - WW • • Sheets A2.105 thru A2.114 - Levels 5 -16 - Dimensions on the north side as to setbacks are inaccurate. Setback distances must be measured from the CCCL. 12/4/07 - WW Sheets A2.105 thru A2.114 - Levels 5 -16 - Dimension the distance the walls of the units project out from the columns, as well as balconies. This relates to setbacks and how close the building actually is to property lines, which is inaccurately indicated on the site plan. 10. 12/21/07 - WW Elevations do not indicate the intended color scheme (no color legend). 12/4/07 - WW Provide all four building elevations that are not colored, that do not have landscaping that hides the building features and does not have any sun shade lines and shading. On the elevations indicate the exterior building material and color. May use a legend indicating such material and color, with numbers on the building corresponding to the legend. You may still include the colored elevations with your submittal package, but there is too much "extra" stuff on the elevations that hides information and makes reviewing the elevations difficult to read. 11 . 12/21/07 - WW Response as to the 8 -inch differential is unclear. Maximum height is 16-0 ", not 16' -8". 12/5/07 - WW Definition of building height limits projections above the top of the flat roof to 16 feet for elevators, stairs and mechanical equipment rooms. North Elevation indicates this maximum height limitation, but it appears theat gable roofed projections (have no idea what they are for) are higher than 16 feet. South Elevation actually dimensioned such as 16' -8" on the lower portion of the building. Revise. 12. 12/21/07 - WW Not all roof eaves and architectural decoration, such as shade structures, indicated on the elevations show up on the floor plans with dimensions from the building AND the setback from the property line. 12/5/07 - WW Floor plans and building elevations - Provide dimensions indicating the distance balconies and roof eaves project from the face of the building. 13 . 12/21/07 - WW Elevation still shows fluctuation, yet the floor plan still shows a basically flat facade. Still unclear. 12/5/07 - WW North and South Elevations - Facade at the amenity Level 4 is indicated as basically flat on the floor plan Sheet A2.104, yet the elevation appears to indicate similar fluctuation of the facade as floors above. Correlate Sheet A2.104 and the building elevations. 14. 12/23/07 & 12/5/07 - WW Transfer of Development Rights - Submitted warranty deeds will be forwarded to Leslie Dougall -Sides to determine if properly written and recorded. If there are issues, will contact you with the issues and how to correct. 15 . 12/21/07 & 12/5/07 - WW Exhibit B - Request "a" - Revise FLD -01005 to FLD2005- 01005. 16. 12/21/07 & 12/5/07 - WW Response to General Applicability criteria #5 - Revise in the second paragraph, last line, "10' -wide shell sidewalk" to "10' -wide shell finish concrete sidewalk ". 17. Sheets 4 & 5 of 13 - Since these floors are not at ground level, remove the doors to the exterior of the building and add doors from the parking garage into the stairwells on the north and south sides of the building. 18. Sheets 3, 4 & 5 of 13 - Show the elevator and lobby next to the west side of the northwesternmost stairwell. 19. Sheets 3/13, L -1, L -2, IR -1 & A2.101 - There are double doors to the exterior shown west of the trash holding room that lead out to landscaping. Unclear as to the purpose of these doors. Suggest removal. 20. Sheet 3/13 - Western wall enclosing the service drive is drawn too far east from that shown on Sheets L -1, L -2, IR -1 and A2.101. Revise location. Alternately, if Sheet 3/13 is the correct location for this wall, then revise Sheets L -1, L -2, IR -1 and A2.101. 21 . Sheet 4/13 - Relocate the words "Fire Command Room" to the appropriate location (see A2.102). 22 . Sheet 3/13 - Show the wall on the east side to screen the three parking spaces south of the lobby facing the valet dropoff area (see Sheet A2.101). Development Review Agenda - Thursday, December 6, 2007 - Page 11 I- . .A 23 . Condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: That there be no public /guest use of either roof, 24. Condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: That application for building permits be submitted no later than January 15, 2010, unless time extensions are granted pursuant to Code provisions; 25 . Prior comments dealt with needing to meet the required 15 -foot front setback (previously a 14.75 -foot dimension was indicated). Plans revised to show structure meeting the 15 -foot front setback. However, on Sheets A2.112, A2.113 and A2.114 a dimension of 14' -10" is now introduced as apparently the front setback to the building. No request to reduce the front setback below 15 feet for the building has been submitted nor is it being advertised. Revise. 26. Sheet 5/13 - Revise location of door into the stairwell east of bank of four elevators from the east wall to the north wall (see Sheet A2.103). 27. Sheets A2.103 - A2.114 and A2.117 - Floor plans do not show any decorative /functional roof or shade structures that are not floor area or balconies, including the distance these decorative /functional roof or shade structures project from the wall facade (and setback from the property line or CCCL). This also holds true for the roof plan, which indicates the "roof' to be located 3' -4" to the south property line and 3' -0" to the north property line (must be to the CCCL). These decorative /functional roof or shade structures can be viewed in the elevations, but are not on the floor plans, and are hard to correlate. Code Section 3 -908 sets out the maximum distance these structures can encroach. There are no increases to these allowable maximums, nor any reductions to setbacks allowable. This has been mentioned before this application was submitted and still appears to be an issue. This has been discussed with Michael Delk, who agrees with this comment. Revise all appropriate sheets. 28 . Sheet A5.100 - West elevation is really the north elevation. Revise to actual west elevation. Other: No Comments Notes: Application is sufficient to move forward to CDB. Revised application packages (one original and 14 copies) to be submitted by noon, 12/13/07 per NT. Development Review Agenda - Thursday, December 6, 2007 - Page 12 0 0 Wells, Wayne From: Doherty, Steve Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2007 3:11 PM To: Watkins, Sherry Cc: Wells, Wayne; Tefft, Robert; Kurleman, Scott; Elbo, Bennett; Fahey, Robert; Gluski, Roberta; Josuns, Sarah; Maran, Robert (Bob); Patni, Himanshu; Rice, Scott; Vo, Phuong Subject: RE: Resubmittals for the January 15, 2008 CDB meeting All four cases listed below have met all Environmental, Engineering, Stormwater and Traffic Engineering conditions. 6 *nL ❑.^r `ill,■ 0c6 S!❑.'RL0*❑^ Engineering Specialist 1 City of Clearwater Engineering steve.doherty@myclearwater.com 727.562.4773 - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Watkins, Sherry Sent: Friday, December 14, 2007 12:17 PM To: Buzzell, William; Chase, Susan; Dougall- Sides, Leslie; DRC Members; Gluski, Roberta; Hollander, Gwen; Hufford, Diane; James Miller; Josuns, Sarah; Lutz, Deb; Patni, Himanshu; Reid, Debbie; Rickard, Leonard; Shell, Heather C.; US Post Office (E- mail); Vo, Phuong; Yellin, Catherine Subject: Resubmittals for the January 15, 2008 CDB meeting DRC Members, Plans for the following cases have been resubmitted for the January 15, 2008 CDB Meeting: FLD2007 -11032 63 Park Place Planner: Robert Tefft FLD2007 -11033 1510 McMullen Booth Planner: Robert Tefft FLD2007 -11034 430 S Gulfview Blvd . Planner: Wayne Wells FLD2007 -09029 1310 Cleveland Street Planner: Scott Kurleman have placed one copy of the case resubmittal package on the cabinets outside of Room 216 in our office for your review (Please do not take it or any of the other copies as they are needed for the CDB members) Please review your comments /conditions for this cases in Permit Plan and determine if they are met. Whether the conditions are "met' or still "not met," please affirm to me via email. Please have these cases reviewed by Thursday, Dec 20, 2007 by 12:00 NOON. Thank you Sherry Watkins Administrative Analyst Planning Department 562 -45 &2 0 0 Wells, Wayne From: Watkins, Sherry Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2007 2:07 PM To: Planning Subject: FW: Resubmittals for the January 15, 2008 CDB meeting FYI - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Rickard, Leonard Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2007 12:08 PM To: Watkins, Sherry Subject: RE: Resubmittals for the January 15, 2008 CDB meeting Lenny Rickard Assistant Fire Marshal Clearwater Fire & Rescue 610 Franklin St., Clearwater, F133756 727 -562 -4327 Ext. 3078 Fax 727 -562 -4461 - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Watkins, Sherry Sent: Friday, December 14, 2007 12:17 PM To: Buzzell, William; Chase, Susan; Dougall- Sides, Leslie; DRC Members; Gluski, Roberta; Hollander, Gwen; Hufford, Diane; James Miller; Josuns, Sarah; Lutz, Deb; Patni, Himanshu; Reid, Debbie; Rickard, Leonard; Shell, Heather C.; US Post Office (E- mail); Vo, Phuong; Yellin, Catherine Subject: Resubmittals for the January 15, 2008 CDB meeting DRC Members, Plans for the following cases have been resubmitted for the January 15, 2008 CDB Meeting: FLD2007 -11032 63 Park Place Planner: Robert Tefft [Rickard, Leonard] Met FLD2007 -11033 1510 McMullen Booth Planner: Robert Tefft [Rickard, Leonard] Met FLD2007 -11034 430 S Gulfview Blvd Planner: Wayne Wells [Rickard, Leonard] Met FLD2007 -09029 1310 Cleveland Street Planner: Scott Kurleman [Rickard, Leonard] Met I have placed one copy of the case resubmittal package on the cabinets outside of Room 216 in our office for your review (Please do not take it or any of the other copies as they are needed for the CDB members) Please review your comments /conditions for this cases in Permit Plan and determine if they are met. Whether the conditions are "met' or still "not met," please affirm to me via email. Please have these cases reviewed by Thursday, Dec 20, 2007 by 12:00 NOON. Thank you Sherry Watkins Administrative Analyst Planning Department 562 -4582 i • Wells, Wayne From: Albee, Rick Sent: Monday, December 17, 2007 8:58 AM To: Watkins, Sherry; Buzzell, William; Chase, Susan; Dougall- Sides, Leslie; DRC Members; Gluski, Roberta; Hollander, Gwen; Hufford, Diane; 'James Miller'; Josuns, Sarah; Lutz, Deb; Patni, Himanshu; Reid, Debbie; Rickard, Leonard; Shell, Heather C.; 'US Post Office (E- mail)'; Vo, Phuong; Yellin, Catherine Subject: RE: Resubmittals for the January 15, 2008 CDB meeting 63 Park Place- No Issues. 1510 McMullen- No issues. 430 Gulfview- No issues. 1310 Cleveland- Condition due at building permit. - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Watkins, Sherry Sent: Friday, December 14, 2007 12:17 PM To: Buzzell, William; Chase, Susan; Dougall- Sides, Leslie; DRC Members; Gluski, Roberta; Hollander, Gwen; Hufford, Diane; James Miller; Josuns, Sarah; Lutz, Deb; Patni, Himanshu; Reid, Debbie; Rickard, Leonard; Shell, Heather C.; US Post Office (E- mail); Vo, Phuong; Yellin, Catherine Subject: Resubmittals for the January 15, 2008 CDB meeting DRC Members, Plans for the following cases have been resubmitted for the January 15, 2008 CDB Meeting: FLD2007 -11032 63 Park Place Planner: Robert Tefft FLD2007 -11033 1510 McMullen Booth Planner: Robert Tefft FLD2007 -11034 430 S Gulfview Blvd Planner: Wayne Wells FLD2007 -09029 1310 Cleveland Street Planner: Scott Kurleman I have placed one copy of the case resubmittal package on the cabinets outside of Room 216 in our office for your review (Please do not take it or any of the other copies as they are needed for the CDB members) Please review your comments /conditions for this cases in Permit Plan and determine if they are met. Whether the conditions are "met" or still "not met," please affirm to me via email. Please have these cases reviewed by Thursday, Dec 20, 2007 by 12:00 NOON. Thank you Sherry Watkins Administrative Analyst Planning Department 562 -4582 Wells, Wayne From: Watkins, Sherry Sent: Monday, December 17, 2007 8:10 AM To: Planning Subject: FW: Resubmittals for the January 15, 2008 CDB meeting - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Reid, Debbie Sent: Friday, December 14, 2007 2:53 PM To: Watkins, Sherry Subject: RE: Resubmittals for the January 15, 2008 CDB meeting Please see below comments. [)ebbie O - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Watkins, Sherry Sent: Friday, December 14, 2007 12:17 -PM To: Buzzell, William; Chase, Susan; Dougall- Sides, Leslie; DRC Members; Gluski, Roberta; Hollander, Gwen; Hufford, Diane; James Miller; Josuns, Sarah; Lutz, Deb; Patni, Himanshu; Reid, Debbie; Rickard, Leonard; Shell, Heather C.; US Post Office (E- mail); Vo, Phuong; Yellin, Catherine Subject: Resubmittals for the January 15, 2008 CDB meeting DRC Members, Plans for the following cases have been resubmitted for the January 15, 2008 CDB Meeting: FLD2007 -11032 63 Park Place Planner: Robert Tefft [Reid, Debbie] Met - no issues with this project. FLD2007 -11033 1510 McMullen Booth Planner: Robert Tefft [Reid, Debbie] Met - no issues with this project. FLD2007 -11034 430 S Gulfview Blvd Planner: Wayne Wells [Reid, Debbie] Not met - impact fees and public art fees due. FLD2007 -09029 1310 Cleveland Street Planner: Scott Kurleman [Reid, Debbie] Met - no issues with this project. I have placed one copy of the case resubmittal package on the cabinets outside of Room 216 in our office for your review (Please do not take it or any of the other copies as they are needed for the CDB members ) Please review your comments /conditions for this cases in Permit Plan and determine if they are met. Whether the conditions are "met' or still "not met," please affirm to me via email. Please have these cases reviewed by Thursday, Dec 20, 2007 by 12:00 NOON. Thank you Sherry Watkins Administrative Analyst Planning ,Department 562 -4582 Message Page 1 of 2 0 i Wells, Wayne From: Clayton, Gina Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2007 3:32 PM To: Delk, Michael; Wells, Wayne; Thompson, Neil; Reynolds, Mike Subject: RE: 430 South Gulfview - FLD2007 -11034 The new provision specifies that a DO is good for 2 years unless another period is specified . The Code currently states that unless otherwise specified in the approval, an application for a building permit shall be made within one year of the level two approval. I think the question at this point should be on what grounds are they requesting two years and can we support that? - - - -- Original Message - - - -- From: Delk, Michael Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2007 3:11 PM To: Wells, Wayne; Clayton, Gina; Thompson, Neil; Reynolds, Mike Subject: RE: 430 South Gulfview - FLD2007 -11034 Wayne.- I believe they are subject to the rule of their approval. Anyone else can weigh in on it though. Michael L. Delk, AICP Planning Director City of Clearwater, Florida myclearwater.com - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Friday, November 30, 2007 6:45 PM To: Delk, Michael; Clayton, Gina; Thompson, Neil; Reynolds, Mike Subject: FW: 430 South Gulfview - FLD2007- 11034 Since there are revisions to the Code going through the process right now relating to this Section of the Code, is this something they can request (I am unaware of the current proposed Code amendment language for this Section)? I need to advise the applicant. Wayne - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Jayne E. Sears [mailto:JayneS @jpfirm.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2007 2:10 PM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: 430 South Gulfview - FLD2007 -11034 The applicant intends to amend the application to add a request for a 2 -year development order. Is this something we can do at resubmittal or do you need a formal request now? Jayne E. Sears Legal Assistant Johnson, Pope, Bokor, Ruppel & Burns, LLP 911 Chestnut Street 12/10/2007 Message Page 2 of 2 v.1,;. 0 • Clearwater, FL 33756 Phone: (727) 461 -1818 Fax: (727) 462 -0365 12/10/2007 Message Page 1 of 1 Wells, Wayne From: Delk, Michael Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2007 3:11 PM To: Wells, Wayne; Clayton, Gina; Thompson, Neil; Reynolds, Mike Subject: RE: 430 South Gulfview - FLD2007 -11034 Wayne - I believe they are subject to the rule of their approval. Anyone else can weigh in on it though. Michael L. Delk, AICP Planning Director City of Clearwater, Florida myclearwater.com - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Friday, November 30, 2007 6:45 PM To: Delk, Michael; Clayton, Gina; Thompson, Neil; Reynolds, Mike Subject: FW: 430 South Gulfview - FLD2007 -11034 Since there are revisions to the Code going through the process right now relating to this Section of the Code, is this something they can request (I am unaware of the current proposed Code amendment language for this Section)? I need to advise the applicant. Wayne - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Jayne E. Sears [mailto:JayneS @jpfirm.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2007 2:10 PM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: 430 South Gulfview - FLD2007 -11034 The applicant intends to amend the application to add a request for a 2 -year development order. Is this something we can do at resubmittal or do you need a formal request now? Jayne E. Sears Legal Assistant Johnson, Pope, Bokor, Ruppel & Burns, LLP 911 Chestnut Street Clearwater, FL 33756 Phone: (727) 461 -1818 Fax: (727) 462 -0365 12/10/2007 *- ilessage • Page 1 of 2 Wells, Wayne From: Reynolds, Mike Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2007 4:53 PM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: FW: 430 South Gulfview - FLD2007 -11034 Wayne, You asked me when Code 4 is likely to be approved. The soonest it can be approved is on January 17, 2008, when it is scheduled for City Council second reading. You also asked for the segments of Code for pertaining to implementation. The latest version is attached: - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Delk, Michael Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2007 3:11 PM To: Wells, Wayne; Clayton, Gina; Thompson, Neil; Reynolds, Mike Subject: RE: 430 South Gulfview - FLD2007711034 Wayne - I believe they are subject to the rule of their approval. Anyone else can weigh in on it though. Michael L. Delk, AICP Planning Director City of Clearwater, Florida myclearwater.com - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Friday, November 30, 2007 6:45 PM To: Delk, Michael; Clayton, Gina; Thompson, Neil; Reynolds, Mike Subject: FW: 430 South Gulfview - FLD2007 -11034 Since there are revisions to the Code going through the process right now relating to this Section of the Code, is this something they can request (I am unaware of the current proposed Code amendment language for this Section)? I need to advise the applicant. Wayne - - - -- Original Message - - - -- . From: Jayne E. Sears [mailto:JayneS @jpfirm.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2007 2:10 PM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: 430 South Gulfview - FLD2007 -11034 The applicant intends to amend the application to add a request for a 2 -year development order. Is this something we can do at resubmittal or do you need a formal request now? 12/10/2007 Message • Page 2 of 2 Jayne E. Sears Legal Assistant Johnson, Pope, Bokor, Ruppel & Burns, LLP 911 Chestnut Street Clearwater, FL 33756 Phone: (727) 461 -1818 Fax: (727) 462 -0365 12/10/2007 Wells, Wayne From: Watkins, Sherry Sent: Friday, December 14, 2007 12:17 PM To: Buzzell, William; Chase, Susan; Dougall- Sides, Leslie; DRC Members; Gluski, Roberta; Hollander, Gwen; Hufford, Diane; James Miller; Josuns, Sarah; Lutz, Deb; Patni, Himanshu; Reid, Debbie; Rickard, Leonard; Shell, Heather C.; US Post Office (E- mail); Vo, Phuong; Yellin, Catherine Subject: Resubmittals for the January 15, 2008 CDB meeting DRC Members, Plans for the following cases have been resubmitted for the January 15, 2008 CDB Meeting: FLD2007 -11032 63 Park Place Planner: Robert Tefft FLD2007- 11033 1510 McMullen Booth Planner: Robert Tefft FLD2007 -11034 430 S Gulfview Blvd Planner: Wayne Wells FLD2007 -09029 1310 Cleveland Street Planner: Scott Kurleman have placed one copy of the case resubmittal package on the cabinets outside of Room 216 in our office for your review (Please do not take it or any of the other copies as they are needed for the CDB members) Please review your comments /conditions for this cases in Permit Plan and determine if they are met. Whether the conditions are "met' or still "not met," please affirm to me via email. Please have these cases reviewed by Thursday, Dec 20, 2007 by 12:00 NOON. Thank you Sherry Watkins Administrative Analyst Planning Department 562 -4582 10.05 am Case Number: FLD2007 -11034 -- 430 S GULFVIEW BLVD Owner(s): T W /Beach Residences - Clearwate 877 Executive Center Dr St Petersburg, Fl 33702 TELEPHONE: No Phone, FAX: Representative: E. D. Armstrong Iii, Esquire No Fax, E -MAIL: No Email 1Z•�i.07 Po Box 1368 Clearwater, F133757 TELEPHONE: 727 - 461 -1818, FAX: 727 - 441 -8617, E -MAIL: jaynes @jpfirm.com Location: 2.45 total acres (1.87 acres zoned Tourist District; 0.58 acres zoned. Open Space /Recreation District) located on the west side of South Gulfview Boulevard approximately 500 feet northwest of Hamden Drive and directly south of Clearwater Beach Atlas Page: 276A Zoning District: T, Tourist Request: (1) Termination of Status of Nonconformity for density (217 overnight accommodation units; where 93 overnight accommodation units are permitted today), under the provisions of Section 6 -109; (2) Flexible Development approval to permit 230 overnight accommodation units (timeshare /interval ownership) with reductions to the front (east) setback from 15 feet to 14.75 feet (to building) and from 15 feet to zero feet (to trash staging area), reductions to the side (north) setback from 10 feet to 7.3 feet from the Coastal Construction Control Line (CCCL) (to building) and from 10 feet to 3.52 feet (to sidewalk), a reduction to the side (south) setback from 10 feet to three feet (to sidewalk and trash staging area), a reduction to the rear (west) setback from 20 feet to 8.3 feet from the CCCL (to building) and from 20 feet to zero feet (to sidewalk), an increase to building height from 35 feet to 150 feet (to roof deck) and a deviation to allow direct access to an arterial street, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2- 803.C; and (3) including the Transfer of Development Rights of eight total dwelling units (being converted to 13 overnight accommodation units) previously approved under TDR2005- 05022, including four dwelling units from 557 and 579 Cyprus Avenue, one dwelling unit from 625 -627 Bay Esplanade and three dwelling units from 667 Bay Esplanade, under the provisions of Section 4 -1402. Proposed Use: Overnight accommodations Neighborhood Clearwater Beach Association Association(s): Clearwater, F133767 100 Devon Dr TELEPHONE: 443 -2168, FAX: No Fax, E -MAIL: papamurphy @aol.com Neighborhood Clearwater Neighborhoods Coalition Association(s): Clearwater, F133758 P O Box 8204 TELEPHONE: No Phone, FAX: No Fax, E -MAIL: No Email Presenter: Wayne Wells, Planner III Attendees Included: City: Wayne Wells,Neil Thompson,Scott Rice,Steve Doherty,Jim Keller,Tom Glenn Applicant: Ed Armstrong,Steve Williamson,Jayne Sears, O.C. Cabrera,Cyndi Tarapani,Hunter Booth,Mike Chatham,Robert Glantz,Chuck Jones,Alan Ciklin Guest: Samuel Vasquez The DRC reviewed this application with the following comments: General Engineering: Development Review Agenda - Thursday, December 6, 2007 - Page 7 s • Prior to Issuance of a Building Permit:. 1. Sidewalk and driveway treatment shall be subject to the approval of a separate right -of -way permit. Contact Don Melone (727) 562 -4798 in Room #220 at the MSB (Municipal Services Building). 2. Brick paver driveways shall be constructed in compliance with Clearwater's Contract Specifications and Standards Index #116. 3. Provide a note or dimension on the plan indicating that the Fire Department Connection (FDC) shall be located no closer than 25 -feet and no further than 50 -feet from the nearest Fire Hydrant Assembly (FHA). 4. Need to provide sufficient evidence the fire flows will be adequate to support this development. 5. Ductile iron pipe shall be installed between any tap and water meter. Ductile iron pipe shall be installed between any tap and backflow preventor device. At least one joint of ductile iron pipe shall be installed on the service side of any backflow preventor device. 6. Storm sewer manhole cover(s) shall not have the words "Clearwater" or City of Clearwater" on them as the system is a private system. Please revise accordingly. 7. If the proposed use of the property includes a restaurant, show grease trap location on the plan. 8. Note: City of Clearwater Contract Specifications and standards Index 109 requires handicapped ramps to be constructed per F.D.O.T. Design Standards Index 304 with a truncated dome surface. 9. Applicant shall pay all applicable sewer and water impact fees. Prior to Issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy: 1. Applicant shall submit 5 sets of as -built drawings that are signed and sealed by a professional engineer or land surveyor registered in the State of Florida. Construction Services Inspector will field inspect as -built drawings for accuracy. General Note: If the proposed project necessitates infrastructure modifications to satisfy site - specific water)capacity and pressure requirements and/or wastewater capacity requirements, the modifications shall be completed by the applicant and at their expense. If underground water mains and hydrants are to be installed, the installation shall be completed and in service prior to construction in accordance with Fire Department requirements. General Note: DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. Environmental: 1 . No Issues. Fire: Development Review Agenda - Thursday, December 6, 2007 - Page 8 a � . 1 . The design of the Fire Standpipe /Sprinkler System must be designed to negate the use of any Pressure Regulating Devices (PRD) in order to provide a safe working environment for FIrefighter usage. This may require design as a zoned system. Acknowledge PRIOR TO CDB 2 . Page 1 Title Sheet of Civil Plan -- Change general note 17 to read "The 2 required Fire Department Connections (FDC) shall be at least 15' from building and located no closer than 25 feet and no further than 50 feet from the nearest Fire Hydrant Assembly (FHA) ". PRIOR TO CDB 3 . Page l0A Civil Plan -- Add 2nd FDC at south end of building. Show 25' to 50 seperation. Show on plan PRIOR TO CDB 4. Civil and Archetectural drawings show SE stair opening into traffic lane. Re design to show exiting out front side to avoid this. Show on all pages PRIOR TO CDB. 5 . Page l0A -- Move FDC south to meet the requirement of 25' to 50' seperation from hydrant. Show on Plan PRIOR TO CDB 6. This building is determined to meet the criteria of a High Rise Building as defined by the Florida Fire Prevention Code, 2004 Edition, therefore the requirements of a High Rise structure must be met. These requirements include, but are not limited to Fire Code items such as: Fire Pump and generator if pump is electric, sprinkler system throughout with control valve and water flow device on each floor, Class I Standpipe System, Fire Alarm using voice /alarm communication, Central Fire Control Station, firefighter phone system, Emergency lighting, and Standby Power as per NFPA 70, Pressurized Stairwells, Stairwell marking and Elevator Lobbies. Please acknowledge PRIOR TO CDB. 7. Page 3 Civil Plan shows Fire Dept Emergency Access on city property. This will not be allowed. It must be on private property. Change PRIOR TO CDB g . 12/6/07 - WW It was agreed upon by Jim Keller and Ed Armstrong that if the Fire Flow calcs are not submitted by the CDB meeting and found acceptable by the Fire Department, then such CDB hearing will be continued, no questions asked. 11/26/07 - LR Page 7 of the application states that Fire Flow calcs are included. None attached. Provide Fire Flow Calculations / Water Study by a FIRE PROTECTION ENGINEER to assure an adequate water supply is available and to determine if any upgrades are required by the developer due to the impact of this project. Calculations / Water Study due PRIOR TO CDB. 9. Show location of emergency generator on both sets of plans. PRIOR TO CDB 10. Show location of Fire Command room on both Civil and Architetural drawings. Must be above flood plane with access from outside the building or be accepsable by way of a smoke proof enclosure. Show on plan plans PRIOR TO CDB. 11 . Civil Plan -- Provide a page that shows that furthest point of travel to rear of building from Fire Dept Vehicle staging areas can be reached within 450' or provide an emergency access road on property that meets Florida Fire Prevention Code requirements of 24' width with the leading edge no closer than 10' from building. Provide PRIOR TO CDB 12. Must Comply with Ordinance No. 7617 -06 Radio System Regulations for buildings, install 911 Radio Repeater / Antenna Booster System Acknowledge PRIOR to CDB Harbor Master: 1 . No issues. Legal: 1 . No issues. Land Resources: No issues. Landscaping: Development Review Agenda - Thursday, December 6, 2007 - Page 9 Sheets L -1 and L 4-P- Crushed coquina shell is proposed on the wesd north sides of the building. Section 3- 1204.13 states "All landscaped areas must be covered with shrubs, ground cover, turf, three inches of organic mulch or other suitable material which permits percolation. Where mulch is used, it must be protected from washing out of the planting bed. Inorganic mulch, such as gravel or rock, should only be used where washouts occur. Plastic sheets shall not be installed under mulches." Provide justification for shell or revise to provide ground cover, turf, organic mulch, etc. Also, location of shell on west side is inconsistently indicated between Sheets L -1 adn L -2. Sheet L -2 - Within the waterfront visibility triangle (northwest and southwest corners of the property), there can be no landscaping (other than turf or groundcover), per Section 3- 904.B. Revise. Sheet L -2 - Silver buttonwood must be a minimum caliper of 2" at time of planting. Revise. Parks and Recreation: 1 . The Public Art and Design Impact Fee is due and payable on this project prior to issuance of building permit. This fee could be substantial and it is recommended that you contact Chris Hubbard at 727 -562 -4837 to calculate the assessment. 2. Open space /recreation impact fees are due prior to issuance of building permits or final plat (if applicable) whichever occurs first. These fees could be substantial and it is recommended that you contact Art Kader at 727 -562 -4824 to calculate the assessment. Stormwater: 1 . The following shall be addressed prior to issuance of building permit. 1. Provide a SWFWMD permit or letter of exemption 2. Route all roof runoff to the vault. 3. Show type, size, and slope of drainage system located on the garage floors and around the site yard drain. 4. Show side swales and their cross sections. 5. Show proposed grade elevations through out the site. 6. Provide an operational and maintenance schedule of the vault. General note: 1. DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. 2. At building permit application, applicant shall submit all data again for review. Solid Waste: 1 . 12/6/07 - WW It was explained that trash dumpsters will be rolled out to the trash staging area on trash pickup days, which is acceptable. 11/21/07 - TJG Please explain how Solid Waste will be serviced. Traffic Engineering: Development Review Agenda - Thursday, December 6, 2007 - Page 10 Planning: Number all the parking spaces for easier identification. 2.How does the gate operate? Show gate console on the site plan. 3. Handicapped aisle nearest a valet parking space does not comply to ADA standards. User is compelled to walk or wheel behind a parked car. 4. On the handicapped parking sign detail change the F.S. number to "318.18 ". 5. Design the parking garage from bi- directional vehicular flow to a one -way flow to prevent motorists from encroaching onto opposing path when making 90 degree turns. 6. Show where mirrors will be installed to aid motorists. 7. Show where blower fans will be installed to expell carbon monoxide and other gases. Blowers shall not encroach on any parking stall dimensions. 8. Show 20' x 20' sight visibility triangles at the driveway. There shall be no objects in the sight triangle over the City's acceptable vertical height criteria. (City's Community Development Code, Section 3 -904). 9. Install vertical height clearance warning signs where necessary. 10. Provide minimum vertical clearance of 114" at accessible passenger loading zones per Florida Building Code Chapter 11 Section 11- 4.6.5. 11. All handicap spaces be provided with wheel stops to protect required signage and to prevent encroachment into accessible path. 12. Handicap walk aisles shall be five feet in width and shall not have columns obstructing the aisle. Some of the aisles are not five feet in width and are obstructed by columns. 13. Show on the plan an accessible path from the lobby on the front of the building to the public sidewalk in accordance with the Florida Accessiblity Code for Building Construction Sec. 11- 4.1.2(1). The above to be addressed prior to Community Development Board (CDB): General Note(s): 1) Applicant shall comply with the current Transportation Impact Fee Ordinance and fee schedule and paid prior to a Certificate of Occupancy (C.O.). 2) DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building. Permit Application. Development Review Agenda - Thursday, December 6, 2007 - Page 11 I . Sheet 3/13 - Sholthe site plan the location and setback from the roperty lines of the exterior of the building structure for the timeshare floors, the balconies and the eaves. Setbacks apply to all structures, whether at grade or in the air. Reality is that the setbacks indicated are inaccurate. Show actual setbacks. Balconies and eaves can only encroach into required setbacks in accordance with the provisions of Section 3 -908. 2. Stairs on the south side of the building exit to a sidewalk. Does the Building /Fire Codes allow for the route of travel from this stairwell to go the west and around the building to the north side of the building. Otherwise, if they had to travel east from this stairwell, it appears blocked by the wall around the trash staging /loading area and the gates. Advise /revise. 3 . Sidewalk on the northwest corner of the building is designed seaward of the CCCL. Unclear why this structure cannot be designed to at least be at a zero setback to the CCCL. Advise /revise. 4. Request must include a reduction to the rear setback from the CCCL from 20 feet to zero feet (to sidewalk). 5 . Sheet 3/13 - Plan indicates proposed building setback at the northeast corner is 14.75 feet. Reality is that, based on floor plans, there is floor area (Levels 4 - 16) and Level 3 parking garage floor above that encroach into the required 15 -foot front setback. In conjunction with other Planning comments, show actual setback from the front property line to the structure (Levels 4 - 16 projected onto the site with proposed setback dimensions). As a 16 -floor building, unclear why a minumum 15 -foot setback cannot be met. Advise /revise. 6. Sheet 3/13 - Provide a dimension from the south property line to the trash staging /loading area. 7. Revise Description of Request - a. Termination - Based on 1.87 acres and a maximum density of 50 rooms per acre, my calculator indicates a maximum of 93 rooms are permitted. by the current zoning and land use. 8. Sheet L -1 - Section 3- 804.C.1 and Section 3 -904.13 only permits a maximum of a three -foot high non - opaque fence within the required setback for waterfront property (which this is) and within waterfront visibility triangles. Revise proposed 4 - 6 foot high fences to a maximum three feet height along the west top of seawall and the southwest and northwest corners of the property. Fence along seawall is also seaward of the CCCL and will require State approval. 9. Sheet 3/13 - Revise parking counts in the bottom right corner: a. there are 12 valet spaces; b. there are three taxi spaces; and c. there are only 98 standard spaces. 10. Sheet A2.101 - Revise parking counts for Level 1 in the bottom right corner: a. there are three taxi spaces; and b. there are only 98 standard spaces. Revise parking counts for Project Total in the bottom right corner: a. there are three taxi spaces; and b. there are only 355 standard spaces. 11 . Sheet 3/13 - Note at bottom of sheet states "refer to architect's drawing for details regarding compactor." What compactor? Where? Architect's plans don't have any details. 12. Sheets 3/13 and A2.10l'- How does trash get into the trash holding room on the first floor? I don't see any doors on the inside of the building for hotel personnel to get into the room to dump the trash into dumpsters, nor any door on the outside of the building to roll the dumpsters out to the street on pickup day. 13. Sheets 3/13, 4/13 and 5/13 - Must indicate the spaces in front of the rear valet parking as also valet parking (total of 12 valet spaces on Level 1, 24 on Level 2 and 12 on Level 3). 14. Sheet 3/13 - Dimension the width of the drop off drive aisle and the width of all driveways. 15 . Sheet 1/13 - Revise Land Use Data Note #8 for Parking: a. Total Parking Spaces column - Revise Level 2 to 142; Revise Total to 415; b. Standard Parking Spaces column - Revise Level 1 to 98; Revise Level 2 to 118; Revise Level 3 to 139; Revise Total to 355; c. Valet Parking Spaces column - Revise Level 1 to 12; Revise Level 2 to 24; Revise Level 3 to 12; Revise Total to 48; and d. Add new Taxi Parking Spaces column with 3 on Level 1; zero on Levels 2 and 3; 3 Total. 16. Sheet 1/13 -Revise Land Use Data for Parking -Proposed to 415. Development Review Agenda - Thursday, December 6, 2007 - Page 12 17 . Sheet A2.104 - Thioor shows various areas with square footage Punts, yet they are undefined as to use. Appears applicant is undecided as to the proposed use of this floor. Explain. Alternately, with so much of this floor undefined as to use, it would appear that this floor could have been designed with units on this floor allowing the building to be reduced in height and/or allowing a slightly different building shape due to reconfiguration of units. 18. Sheet A2.111 - At the bottom of the floor plan drawing, revise Level 10 to Level 11. 19 . Sheet A2.112 - Revise title block on right side of sheet to indicate Level 12 (not 112). 20.. Sheets A2.113 and A2.114 - Building support "room" between Units 1 and 2 needs walls on north side of building and along hallway. 21 . Sheet 1/13 - Land Use Data - Cannot find in the table where Notes [4] and [5] are referred to (except at the bottom of the table; but where above ?). Revise. 22 . Sheet 1/13 - Land Use Data - Based on other Planning comments, revise all proposed setbacks. Those indicated on this sheet are inaccurate or are not specific as to what the proposed setback is for. Reminder - Per Section 3 -905.A requires setbacks to be measured to all structures from the CCCL. 23 . Sheets 3/13, 4/13, 5115, A2.101, A2.102 and A2.103 - On Parking Levels 1, 2 and 3, there are many parking spaces adjacent to solid walls for rooms, stairwells, etc., that block the view of motorists when backing out (backing out blind into the drive aisle). Need to provide mirrors or other devices at all of these spaces to aid motorists. Show on plans the locations of such mirrors or other devices. 24. Sheets 3/13 and A2.101 - It would seem, especially due to the location of the handicap parking spaces, that there would be at least one door from the parking side (handicap accessible path) into the lobby. 25 . Sheets 3/13 and A2.101 - It appears that some level of security of the parking areas on Level 1 are desired, as evidenced by the lift gates at both driveway entrances. However, there doesn't appear to be walls to restrict such access perpendicular to the south end of the northern lift gate to the stairwell, between the columns west of the taxi parking space and south of the lobby around the three parking over to the stairwell. Revise. 26. Sheet A2.101 - Show the northern and southern lift gates at the driveway entrances to the parking garage. 27. Sheet 3/13 - Note #2 at bottom of page - Rather than header curb, do you mean straight curb, as shown in the detail on Sheet 11/13? Show curbing on both sides of all three driveways on Sheets 3/13, 7/13 and L -1. 28 . Sheets 3/13 and A2.101 - There should be at least one door into the service room within the lobby area. 29. Sheets 3/13, A2.101, A2.102 and A2.103 - Two columns on southern most end of parking rows south of ramp (northeast of southwestern stairwell) encroach into the required 24 -foot wide north/south drive aisle. Revise. 30. Levels 1, 2 and 3 indicate valet parking is being provided (only 48 spaces out of a total of 415 spaces, or 11.6 percent of the total number of spaces). Provide more specifics of valet parking, such as location of valet drop off and delivery to customers and the operational aspects of the proposed valet parking. 31 . Sheet 3/13 - Legend on right hand side - SB is not used on the drawing, only in the legend. Revise. 32 . Sheet 3/13 - Note #6 on right hand side - Case FLD2005 -01005 is not applicable once this case is approved by the CDB. Revise language. 33 . Sheet 4/13 - Provide a door into. the Fire Pump Room and label the "service" room west of the bank of four elevators. 34. Sheet 5/13 - a. Label the "service" room west of the bank of four elevators; b. Revise label for "transformer" to "transformer below "; and c. Revise "open to below" on east side to "building support" (see Sheet A2.103) and provide doors into this room (show on both Sheets 5/13 and A2.103). 35 . Sheet 7/13 - Relocate arrow at bottom of drawing for yard drain so that it actually points to a yard drain. Add "(typ)" after words "yard drain ". 36. Sheet 7/13 - Provide existing and proposed grade elevations throughout the site now, so that one can see how the landscaping is working with site drainage. Development Review Agenda - Thursday, December 6, 2007 - Page 13 37 . Sheets A2.105 thru A2.114 - Columns are shown west of the building hat should be removed from the plans, as they do not hold up anything: a. Level 5 - west of units 6/7 and 17/18; b. Levels 6 -9 - west of units 6/7 and 20/21; c. Level 10 - west of units 6/7 and 19/20; d. Level 11 - west of units 6/7 and 18; e. Level 12 - west of units 6/7; f. Level 13 - west of units 4/5; and g. Levels 14 -16 - west of unit 4.. 38 . Sheets A2.105 thru A2.114 - Provide the square footage of the units. 39. Sheet A2.104 - Show the column projections on the south side of the building, similar to the north side of the building (see building elevations). 40. Sheets A2.105 thru A2.114 - Levels 5 -16 - Dimension the distance the walls of the units project out from the columns; as well as balconies. This relates to setbacks and how close the building actually is to property lines, which is inaccurately indicated on the site plan. 41 . Sheet A2.105 - There appears to be exterior walls missing in three locations and it is unclear of the intended use of these rooms once the exterior walls are shown: a. west of unit 5; b. north of unit 12; and c. west of unit 19. 42. Sheet A2.106 - There appears to be exterior walls missing in three locations and it. is unclear of the intended use of these rooms once the exterior walls are shown: a. west of unit 5; b. north of unit 12; and c. west of unit 22. 43 . Sheet A2.110 - There appears to be exterior walls missing in three locations and it is unclear of the intended use of these rooms once the exterior walls are shown: a. west of unit 5; b. north of unit 12; and c. west of unit 21. 44. Sheet A2.111 - There appears to be exterior walls missing in three locations and it is unclear of the intended use of these rooms once the exterior walls are shown: a. west of unit 5; b. north of unit 12; and c. west of unit 19. 45. Sheet A2.112 - There appears to be an exterior wall missing west of unit 5 and it is unclear of the intended use of this room once the exterior wall is shown. 46. Provide all four building elevations that are not colored, that do not have landscaping that hides the building features and does not have any sun shade lines and shading. On the elevations indicate the exterior building material and color. May use a legend indicating such material and color, with numbers on the building corresponding to the legend. You may still include the colored elevations with your submittal package, but there is too much "extra" stuff on the elevations that hides information and makes reviewing the elevations difficult to read. 47. On the building elevations, provide the words "Level 1" through "Level 16" out at the dimension lines. 48. On the building elevations, explain the significance of the V-mV dimension above the FEMA line, as it is unclear what this is dimensioning. 49. Understanding there is a requirement under Beach by Design to have at least 60% of any elevation covered by windows or architectural decoration, provide the actual calculated percentage for each elevation (general statement on elevations that they exceed this 60% is insufficient). 50. Provide a roof plan. 51 . North Elevation - 150 -foot height dimension is indicated to the top of roof slab. The elevation indicates there apparently is intended to have a 42 -inch parapet, which is not drawn on the elevation. Revise. 52 . Definition of building height limits projections above the top of the flat roof to 16 feet for elevators, stairs and mechanical equipment rooms. North. Elevation indicates this maximum height limitation, but it appears theat gable roofed projections (have no idea what they are for) are higher than 16 feet. South Elevation actually dimensioned such as 16-8" on the lower portion of the building. Revise. Development Review Agenda - Thursday, December 6, 2007 7 Page 14 0 53 . There are projections above the maximum building height of 100 fee P J d 150 feet that are neither parapets, elevator towers, stair towers or mechanical equipment rooms. Based on recent legal interpretations from our Legal Department, unless the Code specifically provides a means of requesting such additional height (which I am not aware of), then such structures must be removed from the design/drawing. 54 . Site Plan (Sheet 3/13), floor plans and building elevations - It would be extremely helpful to have north/south and east/west station points /lines set up through the building (such as at columns) with dimensions to better indicate and allow review of the actual location of structures, especially in relation to required setbacks and allowable projections into required setbacks. 55 . Floor plans and building elevations - Provide dimensions indicating the distance balconies and roof eaves project from the face of the building. 56. North and South Elevations - Facade at the amenity Level 4 is indicated as basically flat on the floor plan Sheet A2.104, yet the elevation appears to indicate similar fluctuation of the facade as floors above. Correlate Sheet A2.104 and the building elevations. 57 . East and West Elevations - There appears some type of decorative roof structures on the easternmost and westernmost portions of the building that are not indicated on the floor plans. Revise. 58 . East Elevation - There appears to be some trees proposed on the roof of the amenity level (Level 5) not indicated on the landscape plans. Unclear how these trees would be accessed to provide necessary maintenance. Revise. 59. East Elevation - Vehicular entrances into the building do not read as discerable building entrances. 60. Swimming Pool - Landscape plans appear to indicate the edge of pool and pool deck is elevated above the normal amenity floor slab elevation, but how much higher is unclear. It is also unclear of the pool depth and if the pool is sunk below the normal amenity floor slab elevation. If sunk below the normal amenity floor slab, will there be adequate clearance below the pool for vehicle parking on Level 3? Cross - section on Sheet A6.101 does not provide sufficient information to determine such. Provide better information on the cross - section to indicate compliance on Sheet A6.101. 61 . Transfer of Development Rights - Submitted warranty deeds will be forwarded to Leslie Dougall -Sides to determine if properly written. If there are issues, will contact you with the issues and how to correct. 62. On Page 1 of the application provide the parcel size in square feet. 63 . Exhibit B - Request "a" - Revise FLD -01005 to FLD2005- 01005. 64. Exhibit B - Revise request to include those other reductions or increases indicated through other, Planning Department comments. 65 . Response to General Applicability criteria #1 - North - Revise "10' -wide shell sidewalk" to "10' -wide shell fmish concrete sidewalk ". 66. Response to General Applicability criteria #1 - East - In relation to scale of buildings; unclear of how the three -story "base" actually continues the scale of buildings to the east when, rising above this "base ", is a total 150 -foot tall building. Advise /revise. 67. Response to General Applicability criteria #2 - (1) It can be argued that the "tiered" effect is on a south to north coordinate and there is little or no tiering east to west; and (3) Excess parking is being provided due to the nature of the use that can be characterized closer to a residential use due to the size of the units. None of this excess parking is proposed for public use. This is also a timeshare /interval ownership type of overnight accommodation use, where parking for accessory restaurants and convention space at a hotel could become a problem, but not in this circumstance. Parking is being provided based on need and the type of overnight accommodation use. 68 . Response to General Applicability criteria #3 - First paragraph/first sentence - Revise "10' -wide shell sidewalk" to "10' -wide shell finish concrete sidewalk ". Development Review Agenda - Thursday, December 6, 2007 - Page 15 0 40 69 . Response to General Applicability criteria #4 - Revise: (1) The entrances to the parking garage do not have 150 feet of stacking space. There is only approximately 45 feet from the front property line to the garage door. There is no requirement or directed design of the garage accesses where such stacking can be claimed. However, there is a dropoff area in front that you can talk about in relation to minimizing traffic congestion. It is unclear once someone is dropped off of how the driver maneuvers the vehicle into the garage through the gate, as it is unknown how the gate is operated by valet personnel as well as general guests that don't desire valet service.. Where are any key pads for such operation (both driveways)? If a key pad, direction of traffic flow at the dropoff area would appear to be a problem. Need to think this through a little better. (2) Traffic congestion in the garage is a function of the design and is a private matter. The criteria is relating to traffic congestion on public streets related to this development. The greater amount of parking provided is a function of the type of overnight accommodation use (timeshare /interval ownership). Due to gates at the garage entrances, the number of parking spaces is not a direct correlation to congestion. (3) The three taxi spaces designed may create traffic congestion at the northern garage entrance, which is the first entrance to the site guests would try to use. The taxis have to get into and out of the spaces and they must back into the drive access to the garage. Getting in and out can create backups of guests trying to get in to the site. May want to rethink taxi parking spaces. (4) As to the potential for delivery vehicles at the "loading area ", either the delivery truck will need to back in to the loading zone from S. Gulfview Blvd. or will need to back out into the roadway, which in either case could cause traffic congestion on S. Gulfview Blvd. You are correct that, since loading areas are not required in the Tourist District by Code, having an on -site loading area will provide an area where the truck can sit and not block the travel lanes of S. Gulfview Blvd. 70. Response to General Applicability criteria #5 - Revise in the second paragraph, last line, "10' -wide shell sidewalk" to "10' -wide shell finish concrete sidewalk ". 71 . Response to Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria #1 - Setbacks - Once the actual building is shown on the site plan where the upper levels project farther than that presently indicated on the submitted site plan and the actual setbacks are indicated, then rethink how to address this criteria. Required setbacks are less than presently indicated. See other Planning comments about the size and bulk of the building in relation to required setbacks. 72. Response to Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria #6 - Height and Tower Separation - 800 -foot rule - The project at 521 S. Gulfview Blvd (Entrada) to the southeast has been approved on January 18, 2005, under FLD2004- 04025/TDR2004 -09011 (but not yet constructed) to construct a new building on the west side of the existing hotel building at a height of 128 feet, which falls within the 800 -foot dimension. 73 . Exhibit B - Termination of Nonconforming Status - First paragraph/sentence - Unclear what reference there is to "(162 residential dwelling units)" to remain, as there are no existing residential units and any conversion factors available in the past on other projects is no longer available. Revise. 74. Planning staff is still concerned with the mass, scale and bulk of the building. The northern elevation, which has been previously discussed in meetings, (but also can be an issue for the southern portion of the building) still rises as one main structure absent of any tiering effect east to west. Contributing factors to this is the number of terminated units (217 units, where 93 are permitted today), the transfer of development rights, unit sizes that are residential in scale (with some apparently very large units) and huge amounts of undefined floor area on the amenity Level 4. Additionally, the design where floor area for Levels 4 (or 5) and above projects from the face of the building on Levels 1 -3 reducing building setbacks for a building 99' -4" for the southern portion of the building and 150 feet for the northern portion also creates issues regarding mass, scale and bulk of the building, pushing the building closer to property lines and reducing setbacks. Other: No Comments Notes: Application is sufficient to move forward to CDB. Revised application packages (one original and 14 copies) to be submitted by noon, 12/13/07 per NT. Development Review Agenda - Thursday, December 6, 2007 - Page 16 t� 10:05 am Case Number: FLD2007 -110 4 -- 430 S GULFVIEW BLVD Owner(s): T W /Beach Residences - Clearwate 877 Executive Center Dr St Petersburg, F133702 TELEPHONE: No Phone, FAX: Representative: E. D. Armstrong Iii, Esquire Po Box 1368 No Fax, E -MAIL: No Email 1z. G.o7 Dpkc C*M"OAS Clearwater, F133757 TELEPHONE: 727 - 461 -1818, FAX: 727 - 441 -8617, E -MAIL: jaynes @jpfirm.com Location: 2.45 total acres (1.87 acres zoned Tourist District; 0.58 acres zoned Open Space/Recreation District) located on the west side of South Gulfview Boulevard approximately 500 feet northwest of Hamden Drive and directly south of Clearwater Beach Atlas Page: 276A Zoning District: T, Tourist Request: (1) Termination of Status of Nonconformity for density (217 overnight accommodation units; where 93 overnight accommodation units are permitted today), under the provisions of Section 6 -109; (2) Flexible Development approval to permit 230 overnight accommodation units with reductions to the front (east) setback from 15 feet to 14.75 feet (to building) and from 15 feet to zero feet (to trash staging area), reductions to the side (north) setback from 10 feet to 7.3 feet from the Coastal Construction Control Line (CCCL) (to building) and from 10 feet to 3.52 feet (to sidewalk), a reduction to the side (south) setback from 10 feet to three feet (to sidewalk and trash staging area), a reduction to the rear (west) setback from 20 feet to 8.3 feet from the CCCL (to building) and from 20 feet to zero feet (to sidewalk), an increase to building height from 35 feet to 150 feet (to roof deck) and a deviation to allow direct access to an arterial street, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2- 803.C; and (3) the Transfer of Development Rights of eight total dwelling units (being converted to 13 overnight accommodation units) previously approved under TDR2005- 05022, including four dwelling units from 557 and 579 Cyprus Avenue, one dwelling unit from 625 -627 Bay Esplanade and three dwelling units from 667 Bay Esplanade, under the provisions of Section 4 -1402. Proposed Use: Overnight accommodations Neighborhood Clearwater Beach Association Association(s): Clearwater, F133767 100 Devon Dr TELEPHONE: 443 -2168, FAX: No Fax, E -MAIL: papamurphy @aol.com Neighborhood Clearwater Neighborhoods Coalition Association(s): Clearwater, F133758 P O Box 8204 TELEPHONE: No Phone, FAX: No Fax, E -MAIL: No Email Presenter: Wayne Wells, Planner III Attendees Included: City: Wayne Wells, Neil Thompson, Scott Rice, Steve Doherty, Lenny Rickard, Rick Albee Applicant: Ed Armstrong, Steve Williamson, Katie Cole, Jayne Sears, O. C. Cabrera, Cyndi Tarapani The DRC reviewed this application with the following comments: General Engineering: Development Review Agenda - Thursday, December 6, 2007 - Page 10 Prior to Issuance oI"a Building Permit: • 1. Sidewalk and driveway treatment shall be subject to the approval of a separate right -of -way permit. Contact Don Melone (727) 562 -4798 in Room #220 at the MSB (Municipal Services Building). 2. Brick paver driveways shall be constructed in compliance with Clearwater's Contract Specifications and Standards Index #116. 3. Provide a note or dimension on the plan indicating that the Fire Department Connection (FDC) shall be located no closer than 40 -feet and no further than 100 -feet from the nearest Fire Hydrant Assembly (FHA). 4. Need to provide sufficient evidence the fire flows will be adequate to support this development. 5. Ductile iron pipe shall be installed between any tap and water meter. Ductile iron pipe shall be installed between any tap and backflow preventor device. At least one joint of ductile iron pipe shall be installed on the service side of any backflow preventor device. 6. Storm sewer manhole cover(s) shall not have the words "Clearwater" or City of Clearwater" on them as the system is a private system. Please revise accordingly. 7. If the proposed use of the property includes a restaurant, show grease trap location on the plan. 8. Note: City of Clearwater Contract Specifications and standards Index 109 requires handicapped ramps to be constructed per F.D.O.T. Design Standards Index 304 with a truncated dome surface. 9. Applicant shall pay all applicable sewer and water impact fees. Prior to Issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy: 1. Applicant shall submit 5 sets of as -built drawings that are signed and sealed by a professional engineer or land surveyor registered in the State of Florida. Construction Services Inspector will field inspect as -built drawings for accuracy. General Note: If the proposed project necessitates infrastructure modifications to satisfy site - specific water capacity and pressure requirements and/or wastewater capacity requirements, the modifications shall be completed by the applicant and at their expense. If underground water mains and hydrants are to be installed, the installation shall be completed and in service prior to construction in accordance with Fire Department requirements. General Note: DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. Environmental: 1 . No Issues. Fire: Development Review Agenda - Thursday, December 6, 2007 - Page 11 1 . The design of theme ire Standpipe /Sprinkler System must be designeZc to negate the use of any Pressure Regulating Devices (PRD) in order to provide a safe working environment for FIrefighter usage. This may require design as a zoned system. Acknowledge PRIOR TO CDB 2. Page 1 Title Sheet of Civil Plan -- Change general note 17 to read "The 2 required Fire Department Connections (FDC) shall be at least 15' from building and located no closer than 25 feet and no further than 50 feet from the nearest Fire Hydrant Assembly (FHA) ". PRIOR TO CDB 3 . Page 10A Civil Plan -- Add 2nd FDC at south end of building. Show 25' to 50' seperation. Show on plan PRIOR TO CDB 4. Civil and Archetectural drawings show SE stair opening into traffic lane. Re design to show exiting out front side to avoid this. Show on all pages PRIOR TO CDB. 5 . Page l0A -- Move FDC south to to meet the requirement of 25' to 50' seperation from hydrant. Show on Plan PRIOR TO CDB 6. This building is determined to meet the criteria of a High Rise Building as defined by the Florida Fire Prevention Code, 2004 Edition, therefore the requirements of a High Rise structure must be met. These requirements include, but are not limited to Fire Code items such as: Fire Pump and generator if pump is electric, sprinkler system throughout with control valve and water flow device on each floor, Class I Standpipe System, Fire Alarm using voice /alarm communication, Central Fire Control Station, firefighter phone system, Emergency lighting, and Standby Power as per NFPA 70, Pressurized Stairwells, Stairwell marking and Elevator Lobbies. Please acknowledge PRIOR TO CDB. 7. Page 3 Civil Plan shows Fire Dept Emergency Access on city property. This will not be allowed. t must be on private property. Change PRIOR TO CDB g . Page 7 of the application states that Fire Fow calcs are included. None attached. Provide Fire Flow Calculations / Water Study by a FIRE PROTECTION ENGINEER to assure an adequate water supply is available and to determine if any upgrades are required by the developer due to the impact of this project. Calculations / Water Study due PRIOR TO CDB. 9. Show location of emergency generator on both sets of plans. PRIOR TO CDB 10. Show location of Fire Command room on both Civil and Architetural drawings. Must be above flood plane with access from outside the building or a accessable by way of a smoke proof enclosure. Show on plan plans PRIOR TO CDB. 11 . Civil Plan -- Provide a page that shows that furthest point of travel to rear of building from Fire Dept Vehicle staging areas can be reached within 450' or provide an emergency access road on property tha meets Florida Fire Prevention Code requirements of 24' width with the leading edge no closer than 10' from building. provide PRIOR TO CDB 12. Must Comply with Ordinance No. 7617 -06 Radio System Regulations for buildings, install 911 Radio Repeater / Antenna Booster System Acknowledge PRIOR to CDB Harbor Master: 1 . No issues. Legal: 1 . No issues. Land Resources: No issues. Landscaping: 1 . Sheets L -1 and L -2 - Crushed coquina shell is proposed on the west and north sides of the building. Section 3- 1204.13 states "All landscaped areas must be covered with shrubs, ground cover, turf, three inches of organic mulch or other suitable material which permits percolation. Where mulch is used, it must be protected from washing out of the planting bed. Inorganic mulch, such as gravel or rock, should only be used where washouts occur. Plastic sheets shall not be installed under mulches." Provide justification for shell or revise to provide ground cover, turf, organic mulch, etc. Also, location of shell on west side is inconsistently indicated between Sheets L -1 adn L -2. 2. Sheet L -2 - Within the waterfront visibility triangle (northwest and southwest comers of the property), there can be no landscaping (other than turf or groundcover), per Section 3- 904.13. Revise. 3 . Sheet L -2 - Silver buttonwood must be a minimum caliper of 2" at time of planting. Revise. Parks and Recreation: Development Review Agenda - Thursday, December 6, 2007 - Page 12 1 . The Public Art and Design Impact Fee is due and payable on this p9 ct prior to issuance of building permit. This fee could be substantial and it is recommended that you contact Chris Hubbard at 727 -562 -4837 to calculate the assessment. 2. Open space /recreation impact fees are due prior to issuance of building permits or final plat (if applicable) whichever occurs first. These fees could be substantial and it is recommended that you contact Art Kader at 727 -562 -4824 to calculate the assessment. Stormwater: I . The following shall be addressed prior to issuance of building permit. 1. Provide a SWFWMD permit or letter of exemption 2. Route all roof runoff to the vault. 3. Show type, size, and slope of drainage system located on the garage floors and around the site yard drain. 4. Show side swales and their cross sections. 5. Show proposed grade elevations through out the site. 6. Provide an operational and maintenance schedule of the vault. General note: 1. DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. 2. At building permit application, applicant shall submit all data again for review. Solid Waste: 1 . Please explain how Solid Waste will be serviced. Traffic Engineering: 1 . Number all the parking spaces for easier identification. 2.How does the gate operate? Show gate console on the site plan. 3. Handicapped aisle nearest a valet parking space does not comply to ADA standards. User is compelled to walk or wheel behind a parked car. 4. On the handicapped parking sign detail change the F.S. number to "318.18 ". 5. Design the parking garage from bi- directional vehicular flow to a one -way flow to prevent motorists from encroaching onto opposing path when making 90 degree turns. 6. Show where mirrors will be installed to aid motorists. 7. Show where blower fans will be installed to expell carbon monoxide and other gases. Blowers shall not encroach on any parking stall dimensions. 8. Show 20' x 20' sight visibility triangles at the driveway. There shall be no objects in the sight triangle over the City's acceptable vertical height criteria. (City's Community Development Code, Section 3 -904). 9. Install vertical height clearance warning signs where necessary. 10. Provide minimum vertical clearance of 114" at accessible passenger loading zones per Florida Building Code Chapter 11 Section 11- 4.6.5. 11. All handicap spaces be provided with wheel stops to protect required signage and to prevent encroachment into accessible path. 12. Handicap walk aisles shall be five feet in width and shall not have columns obstructing the aisle. Some of the aisles are not five feet in width and are obstructed by columns. 13. Show on the plan an accessible path from the lobby on the front of the building to the public sidewalk in accordance with the Florida Accessiblity Code for Building Construction Sec. 11- 4.1.2(1). The above to be addressed prior to Community Development Board (CDB). General Note(s): 1) Applicant shall comply with the current Transportation Impact Fee Ordinance and fee schedule and paid prior to a Certificate of Occupancy (C.O.). 2) DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. Planning: Development Review Agenda - Thursday, December 6, 2007 - Page 13 I . Sheet 3/13 - Show•the site plan the location and setback from the property lines of the exterior of the building structure for the timeshare floors, the balconies and the eaves. Setbacks apply to all structures, whether at grade or in the air. Reality is that the setbacks indicated are inaccurate. Show actual setbacks. Balconies and eaves can only encroach into required setbacks in accordance with the provisions of Section 3 -908. 2. Stairs on the south side of the building exit to a sidewalk. Does the Building/Fire Codes allow for the route of travel from this stairwell to go the west and around the building to the north side of the building. Otherwise, if they had to travel east from this stairwell, it appears blocked by the wall around the trash staging /loading area and the gates. Advise /revise. 3 . Sidewalk on the northwest corner of the building is designed seaward of the CCCL. Unclear why this structure cannot be designed to at least be at a zero setback to the CCCL. Advise /revise. 4. Request must include a reduction to the rear setback from the CCCL from 20 feet to zero feet (to sidewalk). 5 . Sheet 3/13 - Plan indicates proposed building setback at the northeast corner is 14.75 feet. Reality is that, based on floor plans, there is floor area (Levels 4 - 16) and Level 3 parking garage floor above that encroach into the required 15 -foot front setback. In conjunction with other Planning comments, show actual setback from the front property line to the structure (Levels 4 - 16 projected onto the site with proposed setback dimensions). As a 16 -floor building, unclear why a minumum 15 -foot setback cannot be met. Advise /revise. 6. Sheet 3/13 - Provide a dimension from the south property line to the trash staging /loading area. 7. Revise Description of Request - a. Termination - Based on 1.87 acres and a maximum density of 50 rooms per acre, my calculator indicates a maximum of 93 rooms are permitted by the current zoning and land use. 8. Sheet L -1 - Section 3- 804.C.1 and Section 3 -904.13 only permits a maximum of a three -foot high non - opaque fence within the required setback for waterfront property (which this is) and within waterfront visibility triangles. Revise proposed 4 - 6 foot high fences to a maximum three feet height along the west top of seawall and the southwest and northwest corners of the property. Fence along seawall is also seaward of the CCCL and will require State approval. 9. Sheet 3/13 - Revise parking counts in the bottom right corner: a. there are 12 valet spaces; b. there are three taxi spaces; and c. there are only 98 standard spaces. 10. Sheet A2.101 - Revise parking counts for Level 1 in the bottom right corner: a. there are three taxi spaces; and b. there are only 98 standard spaces. Revise parking counts for Project Total in the bottom right corner: a. there are three taxi spaces; and b. there are only 355 standard spaces. 11 . Sheet 3/13 - Note at bottom of sheet states "refer to architect's drawing for details regarding compactor." What compactor? Where? Architect's plans don't have any details. 12 . Sheets 3/13 and A2.101 - How does trash get into the trash holding room on the first floor? I don't see any doors on the inside of the building for hotel personnel to get into the room to dump the trash into dumpsters, nor any door on the outside of the building to roll the dumpsters out to the street on pickup day. 13 . Sheets 3/13, 4/13 and 5/13 - Must indicate the spaces in front of the rear valet parking as also valet parking (total of 12 valet spaces on Level 1, 24 on Level 2 and 12 on Level 3). 14. Sheet 3/13 - Dimension the width of the drop off drive aisle and the width of all driveways. 15 . Sheet 1/13 - Revise Land Use Data Note #8 for Parking: a. Total Parking Spaces column - Revise Level 2 to 142; Revise Total to 415; b. Standard Parking Spaces column - Revise Level 1 to 98; Revise Level 2 to 118; Revise Level 3 to 139; Revise Total to 355; c. Valet Parking Spaces column - Revise Level 1 to 12; Revise Level 2 to 24; Revise Level 3 to 12; Revise Total to 48; and d. Add new Taxi Parking Spaces column with 3 on Level 1; zero on Levels 2 and 3; 3 Total. 16. Sheet 1/13 -Revise Land Use Data for Parking -Proposed to 415. Development Review Agenda - Thursday, December 6, 2007 - Page 14 17 . Sheet A2.104 - This floor shows various areas with square footage a ts, yet they are 9 undefined as to use. Appears applicant is undecided as to the proposed use of this floor. Explain. Alternately, with so much of this floor undefined as to use, it would appear that this floor could have been designed with units on this floor allowing the building to be reduced in height and/or allowing a slightly different building shape due to reconfiguration of units. 18. Sheet A2.1 I I - At the bottom of the floor plan drawing, revise Level 10 to Level 11. 19. Sheet A2.112 - Revise title block on right side of sheet to indicate Level 12 (not 112). 20. Sheets A2.113 and A2.114 - Building support "room" between Units 1 and 2 needs walls on north side of building and along hallway. 21 . Sheet 1/13 - Land Use Data - Cannot find in the table where Notes [4] and [5] are referred to (except at the bottom of the table; but where above ?). Revise. 22. Sheet 1/13 - Land Use Data - Based on other Planning comments, revise all proposed setbacks. Those indicated on this sheet are inaccurate or are not specific as to what the proposed setback is for. Reminder - Per Section 3 -905.A requires setbacks to be measured to all structures from the CCCL. 23 . Sheets 3/13, 4/13, 5115, A2.101, A2.102 and A2.103 - On Parking Levels 1, 2 and 3, there are many parking spaces adjacent to solid walls for rooms, stairwells, etc., that block the view of motorists when backing out (backing out blind into the drive aisle). Need to provide mirrors or other devices at all of these spaces to aid motorists. Show on plans the locations of such mirrors or other devices. 24. Sheets 3/13 and A2.101 - It would seem, especially due to the location of the handicap parking spaces, that there would be at least one door from the parking side (handicap accessible path) into the lobby. 25 . Sheets 3/13 and A2.101 - It appears that some level of security of the parking areas on Level 1 are desired, as evidenced by the lift gates at both driveway entrances. However, there doesn't appear to be walls to restrict such access perpendicular to the south end of the northern lift gate to the stairwell, between the columns west of the taxi parking space and south of the lobby around the three parking over to the stairwell. Revise. 26 . Sheet A2.101 - Show the northern and southern lift gates at the driveway entrances to the parking garage. 27. Sheet 3/13 - Note #2 at bottom of page - Rather than header curb, do you mean straight curb, as shown in the detail on Sheet 11/13? Show curbing on both sides of all three driveways on Sheets 3/13, 7/13 and L -1. 28. Sheets 3/13 and A2.101 - There should be at least one door into the service room within the lobby area. 29. Sheets 3/13, A2.101, A2.102 and A2.103 - Two columns on southern most end of parking rows south of ramp (northeast of southwestern stairwell) encroach into the required 24 -foot wide north/south drive aisle. Revise. 30. Levels 1, 2 and 3 indicate valet parking is being provided (only 48 spaces out of a total of 415 spaces, or 11.6 percent of the total number of spaces). Provide more specifics of valet parking, such as location of valet drop off and delivery to customers and the operational aspects of the proposed valet parking. 31 . Sheet 3/13 - Legend on right hand side - SB is not used on the drawing, only in the legend. Revise. 32 . Sheet 3/13 - Note #6 on right hand side - Case FLD2005 -01005 is not applicable once this case is approved by the CDB. Revise language. 33 . Sheet 4/13 - Provide a door into the Fire Pump Room and label the "service" room west of the bank of four elevators. 34 . Sheet 5/13 - a. Label the "service" room west of the bank of four elevators; b. Revise label for "transformer" to "transformer below "; and c. Revise "open to below" on east side to "building support" (see Sheet A2.103) and provide doors into this room (show on both Sheets 5/13 and A2.103). 35 . Sheet 7/13 - Relocate arrow at bottom of drawing for yard drain so that it actually points to a yard drain. Add "(typ)" after words "yard drain ". 36. Sheet 7/13 - Provide existing and proposed grade elevations throughout the site now, so that one can see how the landscaping is working with site drainage. Development Review Agenda - Thursday, December 6, 2007 - Page 15 37 . Sheets A2.105 thru *2.114 - Columns are shown west of the buildinat should be removed from the plans, as they do not hold up anything: a. Level 5 - west of units 6/7 and 17/18; b. Levels 6 -9 - west of units 6/7 and 20/21; c. Level 10 - west of units 6/7 and 19/20; d. Level 11 - west of units 6/7 and 18; e. Level 12 - west of units 6/7; f. Level 13 - west of units 4/5; and g. Levels 14 -16 - west of unit 4. 38. Sheets A2.105 thru A2.114 - Provide the square footage of the units. 39 . Sheet A2.104 - Show the column projections on the south side of the building, similar to the north side of the building (see building elevations). 40. Sheets A2.105 thru A2.114 - Levels 5 -16 - Dimension the distance the walls of the units project out from the columns, as well as balconies. This relates to setbacks and how close the building actually is to property lines, which is inaccurately indicated on the site plan. 41. Sheet A2.105 - There appears to be exterior walls missing in three locations and it is unclear of the intended use of these rooms once the exterior walls are shown: a. west of unit 5; b. north of unit 12; and c. west of unit 19. 42. Sheet A2.106 - There appears to be exterior walls missing in three locations and it is unclear of the intended use of these rooms once the exterior walls are shown: a. west of unit 5; b. north of unit 12; and c. west of unit 22. 43 . Sheet A2.110 - There appears to be exterior walls missing in three locations and it is unclear of the intended use of these rooms once the exterior walls are shown: a. west of unit 5; b. north of unit 12; and c. west of unit 21. 44. Sheet A2.111 - There appears to be exterior walls missing in three locations and it is unclear of the intended use of these rooms once the exterior walls are shown: a. west of unit 5; b. north of unit 12; and c. west of unit 19. 45 . Sheet A2.112 - There appears to be an exterior wall missing west of unit 5 and it is unclear of the intended use of this room once the exterior wall is shown. 46. Provide all four building elevations that are not colored, that do not have landscaping that hides the building features and does not have any sun shade lines and shading. On the elevations indicate the exterior building material and color. May use a legend indicating such material and color, with numbers on the building corresponding to the legend. You may still include the colored elevations with your submittal package, but there is too much "extra" stuff on the elevations that hides information and makes reviewing the elevations difficult to read. 47. On the building elevations, provide the words "Level 1" through "Level 16" out at the dimension lines. 48. On the building elevations, explain the significance of the 1' -8" dimension above the FEMA line, as it is unclear what this is dimensioning. 49. Understanding there is a requirement under Beach by Design to have at least 60% of any elevation covered by windows or architectural decoration, provide the actual calculated percentage for each elevation (general statement on elevations that they exceed this 60% is insufficient). 50. Provide a roof plan. 51 . North Elevation - 150 -foot height dimension is indicated to the top of roof slab. The elevation indicates there apparently is intended to have a 42 -inch parapet, which is not drawn on the elevation. Revise. 52 . Definition of building height limits projections above the top of the flat roof to 16 feet for elevators, stairs and mechanical equipment rooms. North Elevation indicates this maximum height limitation, but it appears theat gable roofed projections (have no idea what they are for) are higher than 16 feet. South Elevation actually dimensioned such as 16' -8" on the lower portion of the building. Revise. Development Review Agenda - Thursday, December 6, 2007 - Page 16 53 . There are project• above the maximum building height of 100 A d 150 feet that are neither parapets, elevator towers, stair towers or mechanical equipment rooms. Based on recent legal interpretations from our Legal Department, unless the Code specifically provides a means of requesting such additional height (which I am not aware of), then such structures must be removed from the design/drawing. 54 . Site Plan (Sheet 3/13), floor plans and building elevations - It would be extremely helpful to have north/south and east/west station points /lines set up through the building (such as at columns) with dimensions to better indicate and allow review of the actual location of structures, especially in relation to required setbacks and allowable projections into required setbacks. 55 . Floor plans and building elevations - Provide dimensions indicating the distance balconies and roof eaves project from the face of the building. 56. North and South Elevations - Facade at the amenity Level 4 is indicated as basically flat on the floor plan Sheet A2.104, yet the elevation appears to indicate similar fluctuation of the facade as floors above. Correlate Sheet A2.104 and the building elevations. 57. East and West Elevations - There appears some type of decorative roof structures on the easternmost and westernmost portions of the building that are not indicated on the floor plans. Revise. 58 . East Elevation - There appears to be some trees proposed on the roof of the amenity level (Level 5) not indicated on the landscape plans. Unclear how these trees would be accessed to provide necessary maintenance. Revise. 59 . East Elevation - Vehicular entrances into the building do not read as discerable building entrances. 60. Swimming Pool - Landscape plans appear to indicate the edge of pool and pool deck is elevated above the normal amenity floor slab elevation, but how much higher is unclear. It is also unclear of the pool depth and if the pool is sunk below the normal amenity floor slab elevation. If sunk below the normal amenity floor slab, will there be adequate clearance below the pool for vehicle parking on Level 3? Cross - section on Sheet A6.101 does not provide sufficient information to determine such. Provide better information on the cross - section to indicate compliance on Sheet A6.101. 61 . Transfer of Development Rights - Submitted warranty deeds will be forwarded to Leslie Dougall -Sides to determine if properly written. If there are issues, will contact you with the issues and how to correct. 62 . On Page 1 of the application provide the parcel size in square feet. 63 . Exhibit B - Request "a" - Revise FLD -01005 to FLD2005- 01005. 64. Exhibit B - Revise request to include those other reductions or increases indicated through other Planning Department comments. 65 . Response to General Applicability criteria #1 - North - Revise "10' -wide shell sidewalk" to "10' -wide shell finish concrete sidewalk ". 66. Response to General Applicability criteria #1 - East - In relation to scale of buildings, unclear of how the three -story "base" actually continues the scale of buildings to the east when, rising above this "base ", is a total 150 -foot tall building. Advise /revise. 67. Response to General Applicability criteria #2 - (1) It can be argued that the "tiered" effect is on a south to north coordinate and there is little or no tiering east to west; and (3) Excess parking is being provided due to the nature of the use that can be characterized closer to a residential use due to the size of the units. None of this excess parking is proposed for public use. This is also a timeshare /interval ownership type of overnight accommodation use, where parking for accessory restaurants and convention space at a hotel could become a problem, but not in this circumstance. Parking is being provided based on need and the type of overnight accommodation use. 68 . Response to General Applicability criteria #3 - First paragraph/first sentence - Revise "10' -wide shell sidewalk" to "10' -wide shell finish concrete sidewalk ". Development Review Agenda - Thursday, December 6, 2007 - Page 17 69 . Response to GeneraTApplicability criteria #4 - Revise: (1) The entrances to the parking garage do not have 150 feet of stacking space. There is only approximately 45 feet from the front property line to the garage door. There is no requirement or directed design of the garage accesses where such stacking can be claimed. However, there is a dropoff area in front that you can talk about in relation to minimizing traffic congestion. It is unclear once someone is dropped off of how the driver maneuvers the vehicle into the garage through the gate, as it is unknown how the gate is operated by valet personnel as well as general guests that don't desire valet service. Where are any key pads for such operation (both driveways)? If a key pad, direction of traffic flow at the dropoff area would appear to be a problem. Need to think this through a little better. (2) Traffic congestion in the garage is a function of the design and is a private matter. The criteria is relating to traffic congestion on public streets related to this development. The greater amount of parking provided is a function of the type of overnight accommodation use (timeshare /interval ownership). Due to gates at the garage entrances, the number of parking spaces is not a direct correlation to congestion. (3) The three taxi spaces designed may create traffic congestion at the northern garage entrance, which is the first entrance to the site guests would try to use. The taxis have to get into and out of the spaces and they must back into the drive access to the garage. Getting in and out can create backups of guests trying to get in to the site. May want to rethink taxi parking spaces. (4) As to the potential for delivery vehicles at the "loading area ", either the delivery truck will need to back in to the loading zone from S. Gulfview Blvd. or will need to back out into the roadway, which in either case could cause traffic congestion on S. Gulfview Blvd. You are correct that, since loading areas are not required in the Tourist District by Code, having an on -site loading area will provide an area where the truck can sit and not block the travel lanes of S. Gulfview Blvd. 70. Response to General Applicability criteria #5 - Revise in the second paragraph, last line, "10' -wide shell sidewalk" to "10' -wide shell finish concrete sidewalk ". 71 . Response to Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria #1 - Setbacks - Once the actual building is shown on the site plan where the upper levels project farther than that presently indicated on the submitted site plan and the actual setbacks are indicated, then rethink how to address this criteria. Required setbacks are less than presently indicated. See other Planning comments about the size and bulk of the building in relation to required setbacks. 72. Response to Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria #6 - Height and Tower Separation - 800 -foot rule - The project at 521 S. Gulfview Blvd (Entrada) to the southeast has been approved on January 18, 2005, under FLD2004- 04025/TDR2004 -09011 (but not yet constructed) to construct a new building on the west side of the existing hotel building at a height of 128 feet, which falls within the 800 -foot dimension. 73 . Exhibit B - Termination of Nonconforming Status - First paragraph/sentence - Unclear what reference there is to "(162 residential dwelling units)" to remain, as there are no existing residential units and any conversion factors available in the past on other projects is no longer available. Revise. 74. Planning staff is still concerned with the mass, scale and bulk of the building. The northern elevation, which has been previously discussed in meetings, (but also can be an issue for the southern portion of the building) still rises as one main structure absent of any tiering effect east to west. Contributing factors to this is the number of terminated units (217 units, where 93 are permitted today), the transfer of development rights, unit sizes that are residential in scale (with some apparently very large units) and huge amounts of undefined floor area on the amenity Level 4. Additionally, the design where floor area for Levels 4 (or 5) and above projects from the face of the building on Levels 1 -3 reducing building setbacks for a building 99' -4" for the southern portion of the building and 150 feet for the northern portion also creates issues regarding mass, scale and bulk of the building, pushing the building closer to property lines and reducing setbacks. Other: No Comments Notes: Development Review Agenda - Thursday, December 6, 2007 - Page 18 • 0 Community Response Team Planning Dept. Cases — DRC Uj � I/ .( • Meeting l��ao�l Me g Date: Case No. � , Location: `� ° ac(irw �/�o t VV t, Current Use: �T Active Code Enforcement Cayes:_ Address number (yes) no Landscapi (yes) (no) o Overgrown (Yes) ,,� Debris (yes) (o) Inoperative vehicle(s) (yes) .no) ,,Ia,Building(s) (good) (fair) (poor) ( acant land) Fencing (none) (good) (dilapidated) (broken and /or missing pieces) ❑ Paint (good) (fair) (poor) (garish) Grass Parking (yes) Ono) Residential Parking Violations (yes) ..(no) Signage Y(n/(striped) (ok) (not ok) (billboard) Parkin (handicapped) (needs repaving) ,a' Dumpster (enclosed) (not enclosed) saw Outdoor storage (yes) ty �,� Comments /Status Report (attach any pertinent docum nts): _ � l0� Date: Ul W [0/�Reviewed by: Li, �- I Telephone: Revised 03- 29 -01; 02 -04 -03 Aw.sunbiz.org - DepartmenoState • Home Contact Us E- Filing Services Document Searches Previous on..List .Next on List. Return To List Events Name History Detail by Entity Name Florida Limited Liability Company INDIGO BEACH, L.L.C. Filing Information Document Number L05000050088 FEI Number 202866567 Date Filed 05/19/2005 State FL Status ACTIVE Last Event NAME CHANGE AMENDMENT Event Date Filed 02/23/2006 Event Effective Date NONE Principal Address 877 EXECUTIVE CENTER DR. W. SUITE 205 ST. PETERSBURG FL 33702 -2472 US Mailing Address 877 EXECUTIVE CENTER DR. W. SUITE 205 ST. PETERSBURG FL 33702 -2472 US Reaistered Aaent Name & Address MERRILL, S. TODD 877 EXECUTIVE CENTER DR. W. SUITE 205 ST. PETERSBURG FL 33702 -2472 US Name Changed: 04/24/2007 Manager /Member Detail Name & Address Title MGRM IB HOLDINGS, L.L.C. 877 EXECUTIVE CENTER DR. W., SUITE 205 ST. PETERSBURG FL 33702 -2472 US Page I of 2 Forms H Emity,Name'; http: / /www. sunbiz.org/ scripts /cordet.exe? action= DETFIL &inq_doc_ number= LO500005O... 11/27/2007 oil Awsunbiz.org - DepartmenoState • Page 2 of 2 Annual Reports Report Year Filed Date 2006 04/24/2006 2007 04/24/2007 Document Images 04/24/2007 ANNUAL REPORT f,-View image in PDF format 04/24/2006 ANNUAL RT REPO age in PDF formate 02/23/2006 Name Change i Vie - w image in PDF Eor:m:at= Q511.9t Florida Limited,._ Liabil.it View image in PDF format .... . . . Liability .............. _.y 1� I Note: This is not official record. See documents if question or. conflict. Previous on List Next on List Return To. List Events Name History I Entity Name! Home Contact us Document Searches E-Filing Services Forms Help Copyright and Privacy Policies Copyright (E) 2007 State of Florida, Department of State. http://www.sunbiz.org/scripts/cordet.exe?action=DETFIL&inq_doc—number--LO500005O... 11/27/2007 • M 02/23/06 x 21 FAX 727563 4 1 Division of Co ratio P 1 of I Florida Department of State Division ofCorporadons 29h � � �� q q: 32 Public Access SysU m Electronic Filing Cover Sheet SECRETARY OF STAVE TALLAHASSEE. FLORSOA Note: Please print this page and use it as a cover sheet. Type the fax audit i imber (shown below) on the top and bottom of all pages of the docume at. (((H06000048974:-',))) Note. DO NOT hit the REFRESH/R.ELOAD button on your browser from t i is page. Doing so will generate another cover sheet. To: Division of Corporations Fax Number : (850)205 -0383 From: Account Name TAYLOR WOODROW COMMUNITIES Account Number I20000000218 Phone ; (727) 563 -9882 Fax Number (727)563 -'9674 1 LLC AM1vD/RES'I`ATEK C-, .: T'W/BEACH RESYDEN wT OR WIVIG RESIGN - CLE,ARWATER, L.L. ) �. Certificate of status 0 Certifi ed Co pX 1 N 0:1 a Estimated Charge $55.64 cs wT OR WIVIG RESIGN - CLE,ARWATER, L.L. ) �. Certificate of status 0 Certifi ed Co pX 1 l'a a Count 0:1 a Estimated Charge $55.64 o � i Electronic Filing Menu https: / /efil a ,sunbiz.org /scripts /efilcovr.exe Corporate filing Menu a 1 NX0 \ Help 0 2/23!2006 0 02/23/06 11:21 FAX 7275630674 FAN: H060000429z1►.3 ARTICLES OF AMENPMENT TO ARTICLES OF ORGANIZATION OF TWBEACH RESIDENCES - CLE)&WATER, a Florida limited liability company Document No. 1,05000050088 Q 002 FILED Mh FEB 23 A c: 32 L.L.C. SECRETARY OF STATE TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA FIRST: The date of the filing of the Articles of Orgwaization was May 1' 1 2005 SECOND: The following amendment to the Articles of Organization was as I )pted by the limited liability company: Article I is amended by deleting such Article I in its entirety jmd subsi i tuting the following: "rlR_ICLE_ lam- N. 4 k The name of the limited liability company .s INDIGO BEACH, 1. E. C. " The undersigned have executed these Articles of Amendment to Arlicl( i of Organization as of February 21, 2006, FAN: H060000097Y 3 MEMBERS: TAYLOR WOODROW U.S. TO1,ER, INC. a Delaware �prpo do 11 > By: a. Cohen, Vic °,sid , nt LCTI,n50 Pi -yiellas County Property Appoer Information: 07 29 15 29246 001 000 Page 2 of 5 07 / 29 / 15 / 52380 / 000 / 0330 27 -Nov -2007 Jim Smith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 19:39:10 Ownership Information Uacant Property Use and Sales T W /BEACH RESIDENCES- CLEARWATER LLC OBK: 14361 OPG: 2540 877 EXECUTIVE CENTER DR ST PETERSBURG FL 33702 -2460 EVAC: A EUAC Comparable sales value as Prop Rddr: 0 of Jan 1, 2007, based on Census Tract: 260.02 sales from 2005 - 2006: 0 Sale Date OR Book /Page Price (Qual /UnQ) Vac /Imp Plat Information 6 /2,005 14,361/2,540 31,500,000 (Q) I 1925: Book 013 Pgs 012 -013 12/2,003 13,283/2,290 20,138,200 (U) I 0000: Book Pgs - 0 /1,977 4,591/1,704 5,125,000 (Q) I 0000: Book Pgs - 0 /1,972 3,788/ 655 1,699,500 (Q) I 2007 Value EXEMPTIONS Just /Market: 16,414,800 Homestead: NO Ownership % .000 Govt Exem: NO Use %: .000 Assessed /Cap: 16,414,800 Institutional Exem: NO Tax Exempt %: .000 Historic Exem: 0 Taxable: 16,414,800 Agricultural: 0 2007 Tax Information District: CU Seawall: Frontage: Clearwater View: 07 Tax: 327,263.5 Land Size Unit Land Land Land Front x Depth Price Units Meth 07 Millage: 19.9371 1) 255 x 314 250.00 80, 070.00 S 07 Spec Asmt: .00 2) 0 x 0 1,000.00 .49 A 3) 0 x 0 .00 .00 Without the Save -Our -Homes 4) 0 x 0 .00 .00 cap, 2007 taxes will be : 5) 0 x 0 .00 .00 327, 263.51 6) 0 x 0 . 00 . 00 Without any exemptions, 2007 taxes will be 327, 263.51 Short Legal LLOYD- WHITE - SKINNER SUB LOTS 33, 34 & 35 & PT OF Description LOT 36 Sc SUBH LAND ON W PER O.R. 765/542 ALL DESC Building Information http:H136.174.187.131htbinlcgi- click ?o =1 &a =1 &b =1 &c =1 &r= .16 &s= 4 &t3 =1 &u= 0 &p =... 11/27/2007 Pinellas County Property Aper Information: 07 29 15 29246 001 0di 07 / 29 / 15 / 52380 / 000 / 0330 Page 3 of 5 27 -Nov -2007 Jim Smith, CFA Pinellas COunty Property Appraiser 19:39:10 Vacant Parcel Property Use; 000 Land Use; 10 Va+can-t Extra F�atur�s Description Dimensions Price Units Value RCD Year 1) .00 0 0 0 0 2) .00 0 0 0 0 3) .00 0 0 0 0 4) .00 0 0 0 0 5) .00 0 0 0 0 6) . 00 0 0 0 0 TOTAL RECORD VALUE; 0 Map With Property Address (non- vacant) F*- ooa M M http : / /l36.174.187.13/htbin/cgi- click ?o =1 &a =1 &b =1 &c =1 &r= .16 &s= 4 &t3 =1 &u= 0 &p =... 11/27/2007 Picellas County Property Appo er Information: 07 29 15 29246 001 Of Page 4 of 5 1/8 Mile Aerial Photograph (2002) http: // 136 .174.187.13 /htbin/cgi- click ?o =1 &a =1 &b =1 &c =1 &r= .16 &s= 4 &t3 =1 &u= 0 &p =... 11/27/2007 Pinellas County Property ApPOer Information: 07 29 15 29246 001 Of Page 5 of 5 Pinellas County Property Appraiser Parcel Information http: // 136 .174.187.13 /htbin/cgi- click ?o =1 &a =1 &b =1 &c =1 &r=.1 beds =4 &t3 =1 &u= 0 &p =... 11/27/2007 CITY OF CLEARWATER NOTICE OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD PUBLIC HEARINGS The Community Development Board of the City of Clearwater, Florida, will hold public hearings on Tuesday, January 15, 2008, beginning at 1:00 pm, in the City Council Chambers, in City Hall, 3rd floor, 112 South Osceola Ave, Clearwater, Florida, to consider the following requests: NOTE: All persons wishing to address an item need to be present at the BEGINNING of the meeting. Those cases that are not contested by the applicant, staff, neighboring property owners, etc. will be placed on a consent agenda and approved by a single vote at the beginning of the meeting. 1. Goral Tov ADA Compliant, LTD i E.D. Armstrong III, Esquire) are requesting Flexible, Development approval for termination of status as a nonconformity for a Retail Sales & Service use (shopping center) within the Industrial, Research & Technology (IRT) District as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project pursuant to Community Development Code (CDC) Sections 2- 1304.0 and 6 -109 along with a Comprehensive Landscape Program pursuant to CDC Sec. 3- 1202.G. (Proposed Use: Offices, Retail Sales and Services, Restaurants, and Vehicle Service.) at 1500, 1510, 1520, 1530, 1540, 1550, 1560, 1570, 1580, 1590, 1600, 1610 and 1620 McMullen Booth Rd, South Oaks Fashion Square Lot 1. Assigned Planner: Robert G. Tefft, Planner III. FLD2007 -11033 2. Offices at Park Place LLC. (Richard Harris, Gulf Coast Consulting, Inc.) are requesting Flexible Development approval for a Retail Sales and Service use (child care) as a principal use where it would otherwise only be permissible as an accessory use within the Industrial, Research & Technology (IRT) District as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project pursuant to Community Development Code (CDC) Section 2- 1304.C.. [Proposed Use: Retail Sales and Services (Child Care)] at 63 Park Place Boulevard, Storz Ophthalmics, Inc., Park Place Lot 1 less that part desc beg NE Cor of SD lot 1 TH . Assigned Planner: Robert G. Tefft, Planner III. FLD2007 -11032 3. Abdol Kheiriddine (Renee Ruggiero, Northside Engineering Services, Inc.) are requesting Flexible Development approval for a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project to permit a retail sales /service and office use in the Commercial (C) District within the Downtown East Gateway Character District with a reduction to the required front (south) setback from 25 ft to zero feet (to steps), a reduction to the required front (west) setback from 25 ft to zero ft (to sidewalk), a reduction to the side (north) setback from 10 ft to 6 feet (to parking lot), a reduction to the side (east) setback from 10 ft to 5 ft (to parking lot), an increase in the allowable building height from 25 ft to 36 ft (to parapet) and a reduction to the required parking spaces from 41 spaces to 33 spaces under the provision of Sec. 2- 704.C. and a reduction to the required front (south) landscape buffer from 15 ft to zero ft, a reduction to the required front (west) landscape buffer from 10 ft to 1 foot, a reduction to the required side (north) landscape buffer from 12 ft to six feet, a reduction to the required side (east) landscape buffer from 5 ft to zero ft, a reduction to the required foundation landscaping from 5 ft to zero ft and a reduction to required interior landscape from 10 percent to 8 percent under the provisions of a Comprehensive Landscape Program per Sec. 3- 1202.G. (Proposed Use: Retail Sales and Services and Office) at 1310 Cleveland St, Brookwood Terrace. Blk 2 Lots 26 & 29 -33. Assigned Planner: A. Scott Kurleman, Planner II. FLD2007 -09029 4. Salt Block 57, LLC, formerly owned by Inid2o Beach, LLC, formerly known as TWBeach Residences — Clearwater, LLC. (E.D. Armstrong III, Esq. and Johnson, Pope, Bokor, Ruppel & Burns, LLP) are requesting (1) Termination of Status of Nonconformity for density (217 overnight accommodation units; where 93 overnight accommodation units are permitted today), under the provisions of Section 6 -109; (2) Flexible Development approval to permit 230 overnight accommodation units in the Tourist (T) District with reductions to the front (east) setback from 15 feet to zero feet (to trash staging area), reductions to the side (north) setback from the Coastal Construction Control Line (CCCL) from 10 feet to 6 feet (to building) and to zero feet (to sidewalk), reductions to the side (south) setback from 10 feet to 3 feet (to sidewalk) and to zero feet (to trash staging area), reductions to the rear (west) setback from the CCCL from 20 feet to 8 feet (to building) and to zero feet (to sidewalk), an increase to building height from 35 feet to 100 feet (to roof deck) and to 150 feet (to roof deck) for two portions of the building, a deviation to allow direct access to an arterial street and to allow a two -year time frame to submit for a building permit, as a Comprehensive Infll Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Sec 2- 803.C; and (3) including the Transfer of Development Rights of 8 total dwelling units (being converted to 13 overnight accommodation units) previously approved and transferred under TDR2005- 05022, including four dwelling units from 557 and 579 Cyprus Ave, one dwelling unit from 625 -627 Bay Esplanade and 3 dwelling units from 667 Bay Esplanade, under the provisions of Sec 4 -1402. (Proposed Use: 230 Overnight Accommodation units) at 430 South Gulfview Blvd, Lloyd- White - Skinner Sub Lots 33, 34 & 35 & pt of lot 36 & Subm Land on W per O.R. 765/542 All Desc . Assigned Planner: Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Planner III. FLD2007- 11034 /TDR2005 -05022 Interested parties may appear and be heard at the hearing or file written notice of approval or objection with the Planning Director or City Clerk prior to the hearing. Any person who decides to appeal any decision made by the Board or Council, with respect to any matter considered at such hearings, will need to request a record of the proceedings and, for such purpose, may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based per Florida Statute 286.0105. Community Development Code Sec 4 -206 states that parry status shall be granted by the Board in quasi-judicial cases if the person requesting such status demonstrates that s/he is substantially affected. Parry status entitles parties to personally testify, present evidence, argument and witnesses, cross - examine witnesses, appeal the decision and speak on reconsideration requests, and needs to be requested and obtained during the case discussion before the CDB. An oath will be administered swearing in all persons giving testimony in quasi-judicial public hearing cases. If you wish to speak at the meeting, please wait to be recognized, then state and spell your name and provide your address. Persons without party status speaking before the CDB shall be limited to three minutes unless an individual is representing a group in which case the Chairperson may authorize a reasonable amount of time up to 10 minutes. Five days prior to the meeting, staff reports and recommendations on the above requests will be available for review by interested parties between the hours of 8:30 a.m. and 4:30 p.m., weekdays, at the City of Clearwater, Planning Department, 100 S. Myrtle Ave., Clearwater, FL 33756. Please contact the case presenter, at 562 -4567 to discuss any questions or concerns about the project and/or to better understand the proposal and review the site plan. Michael Delk Cynthia E. Goudeau, MMC Planning Director City Clerk -^ • City of Clearwater P.O. Box 4748, Clearwater, FL 33758 -4748 NOTE: Applicant or representative must be present at the hearing. A COPY OF THIS AD IN LARGE PRINT IS AVAILABLE IN OFFICIAL RECORDS AND LEGISLATIVE SERVICES. ANY PERSON WITH A DISABILITY REOU11RING REASONABLE ACCOMMODATION IN ORDER TO PARTICIPATE IN THIS MEETING SHOULD CALL (727) 562 -4093 WITH THEIR REQUEST. To learn more about presenting to Clearwater boards and City Council, go to http:// clearwater .granicus.comNiewPublisher.php ?view id =11 and click on "Resident Engagement Video." You can also check the informational video out from any Clearwater public library. Ad: 01/03/08 1216352 ONTARIO INC 7071 BAYVI EW AVE # 504 THORNHILL ON L3T 7Y8 00030 - CANADA ALBANESE, JANICE M ALBANESE, JOSEPH M 52 RIDGEWAY WHITE PLAINS NY 10605 - 3708 ALLEN, NANCY GADDIS, SUSAN 440 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 305 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2509 ANDERSON, REGINA W 440 SOUTH GULFVIEW BLVD # 1702 N CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2519 ARMSTRONG, JAMES L ARMSTRONG, DEBRA J 95 DEERPATH DR OLDSMAR FL 34677 - 2064 ASKALANI LIVING TRUST ASKALANI, SANAA M BNF 440 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 605 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2512 BAKER, ROBERT E BAKER, ANN E 34 PLEASANT VIEW DR HANOVER PA 17331 - 8855 BARONE, ANDREW A BARONE, ALAN 2421 HORATIO ST # 832 TAMPA FL 33609 - 3377 BATIANIS, THOMAI LIVING TRUST BATIANIS, THOMAI THE 440 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 1504 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2518 FID2007- 11034; 323 AGLO PROPERTIES LLC 80 MAIN ST MILLVILLE PA 17846 - ALBERTI, MICHAEL ALBERTI, MARK 147 SIEBERT RD LANCASTER NY 14086 - ANASTASOPOULOS, GEORGE E ANASTASOPOULOS, EKATERINI 440 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 201 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2509 APPLE, JAMES R PO BOX 310474 TAMPA FL 33680 - 0474 ARQUILLA, MICHAEL P THE 1253 RICHFIELD CT WOODRIDGE IL 60517 - 7709 AYO, DENNIS H 440 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 607 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2512 BALOW, RONALD D THE FOLINO, JOHN F 27989 US HIGHWAY 19 N CLEARWATER FL 33761 - 4906 BARONE, ANDREW A BARONE, ALAN 5206 STATE ROUTE 256 BALTIMORE OH 43105 - 9446 BEDROCK ENTERPRISES LLC 17796 WALL CIR REDINGTON SHORES FL 33708 - 1248 0ALANIK PROPERTIES LLC 421 GULFVIEW BLVD CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2508 ALCIATORE; GASTON ALCIATORE, NANCY J 440 GULFVIEW BLVD #402 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2510 ANDERSON, CRAIG S 610 E HINTZ RD ARLINGTON HGTS IL 60004 - 2601 ARENSKY,ARKANDY THE ARENSKY, ELIZABETH THE 2506 STONEBRIGHE LN NORTHBROOK IL 60062 - 8106 ARTHUR, DAVID W ARTHUR, JEAN E 1000 KELVIN CT WORTHINGTON OH 43085 - 2919 BAILEY, BEVERLY BAILEY, H AUBREY 103 KINGSBURY WOODS MIDDLESBORO KY 40965 - 1730 BANOUB,ATEF BANOUB, AMAL 486 KENT PL W HEMPSTEAD NY 11552 - 3340 BARRY, DONALD J THE BARRY, JAMES J THE 743 MARKGRAFS LAKE DRAW SAINT PAUL MN 55129 - 8586 BEYNON, ROBERT L BEYNON,REBECCA 1900 ALLEGHENY BLDG PITTSBURGH PA 15219 - 1623 BILLINGSLEY, GARY R BILLINGSLEY, GARY R BINNS, CRYSTAL A BILLINGSLEY, TAMERA A BILLINGSLEY, TAMERA 6883 N BUCK CREEK SHADES 6883 N BUCK CREEK SHADES WEST RD W J FAIRLAND IN 46126 - 9553 FAIRLAND IN 46126 - 9553 W JEFFERSON OH 43162 - 9407 BISHARA, MACARL M BISHAY, ADEL A 2227 KENT PL BISHAY, SAWSAN G CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 6624 6156 NEW OSPREY POINT SPRING HILL FL 34607 - 4040 BLOSSER, ROBERT L BLOSSER, JANE A 583 E ST CARLISLE PA 17013 - 1335 BREMIS, JAMES J BREMIS, SOPHIE 1177 BROADWAY SOMERVILLE MA 02144 - 1742 BROWN, SCOTT L BROWN, SHELLEY A 3374 E LAKE SHORE LN CLEARWATER FL 33761 - 1716 BUKACEK, MARTA M 14086 JENNIFER TER LARGO FL 33774 - 5105 BOESEN, ROBERT J BOESEN, CHRISTIE J 13950 LAKEVIEW DR CLIVE IA 50325 - BLAYLOCK, MICHAEL D BLAYLOCK, REBECCA D 4703RD STS #912 ST PETERSBURG FL 33701 - 4647 BOLLING, CHRISTOPHER J BOLLING, ALISON J P O BOX 2696 SOUTH PORTLAND ME 04116 - 2696 BROTEMARKLE, MARTIN L SR BROWN, ALAN C TRUST BROWN, JUNE M POST, JO ANN 450 S GULFVIEW BLVD #602 28605 KENDALLWOOD DR CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2524 FARMINGTON HILLS MI 48334 - 3458 BROWN, STEPHANIE L 1702 HUNTINGTON CT SAFETY HARBOR FL 34695 - 5635 CALOUDIS, MARY THE 4078 CARROLL BLVD UNIVERSITY HT OH 44118 - 4516 CARAYANNOPOULOS, GEORGE L CHAMPAGNE, ROLAND J CARAYANNOPOULOS, MARGARET P CHAMPAGNE, HELEN L 75 VILLAGEWOOD DR 440 GULFVIEW BLVD # 303 BURLINGTON MA 01803 - CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2509 CONNELL, PETER W 1401 MISSOURI AVE # 333 LARGO FL 33770 - 1821 CRAIG, NEVIN J 103 MEADOW LN CLAIRTON PA 15025 - 3376 CURTIS, JAMES G CURTIS, JOHN G 343 S MAIN ST ANN ARBOR MI 48104 - 2137 CONSTANTINIDES, NICHOLAS S CONSTANTINIDES, MICHAEL 1027 HILLEN BALTIMORE MD 21202 - 4132 CURRENT OWNER 2620 WOOD POINTE DR HOLIDAY FL 34691 - 8722 CVETETIC, JOSEPH CVETETIC, MARY 5111 ESTES AVE SKOKIE IL 60077 - 3437 BUCHELE, NIKOLAUS BUCHELE, MARYANNE 13360 VERONA TUSTIN CA 92782 - 9140 CANTERBURY OAKS INC 401 S GULFVIEW BLVD CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2508 CHRISMAN, ROBERT D CHRISMAN, CAROLEE 3428 ADAMS SHORE DR WATERFORD MI 48329 - 4202 CORRY, PATRICK E CORRY, KELLY J 599 HAWTHORNE ELMHURST IL 60126 - 4240 CURTIN, ROBERT C CURTIN, SARAH S 8112 QUINN TER VIENNA VA 22180 - 7452 D'AMICO, LOUIS J 410 HAMDEN DR CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2535 DAMJANOVIC, TEREZO DASIKA, VIJAY DEARNBARGER, WILLIAM L DAMJANOVIC, MARY 15913 LAHINCH CIR 5029 KILLOWEN CT 515 PARKHOLLOW LN ODESSA FL 33556 - 2865 COLUMBUS OH 43230 - 4008 PHILADELPHIA PA 19111 - 1365 DECADE GULFCOAST HOTEL • PTNRS J K GULFVIEW N19 W24130 RIVERWOOD DR # 100 WAUKESHA WI 53188 - 1131 DICKERSON, BETTY LEE LIVING TR DICKERSON, BETTY LEE THE 450 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 1002 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2526 D'IPPOLITO, ANTHONY D'IPPOLITO, LOUISE 4 BLANCHARD RD GREENWICH CT 06831 - 3676 DUNN, RICHARD A COX, PHYLLIS D 3600 CANTERBURY DR JEFFERSONTOWN KY 40299 - 3508 ERKEN, YALCIN EKREN, FILIZ 3061 DOX BERRY CT CLEARWATER FL 33761 - 2003 FELL, DONALD G FELL, DIANE M 1744 STANTON AVE GLENDALE CA 91201 - 2859 FIFTH SOUTH LLC 401 CORONADO DR CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2506 FIRESTONE, GREG FIRESTONE, NANCY 1016 PASEO DEL RIO NE ST PETERSBURG FL 33702 - FLORIDA BEACH VENTURES LLC 3993 ARLINGTON DR PALM HARBOR FL 34685 - DENICKE, WILLIS H JR THE DENICKE, ANTONIA M THE PO BOX 628 STEVENS POINT WI 54481 - 0628 DILLMAN, TOM L DILLMAN, SUSAN J 440 S GULFVIEW BLVD #1605 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2519 DIVACO INC 455 S GULFVIEW BLVD CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2508 DYBA, YOLANDA 450 S GULFVIEW BLVD #1201 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2529 FAHY, MICHAEL FAHY, MARY 16 LARK ST PEARL. RIVER NY 10965 - 2815 FERGUSON, EDMUND 6133 OAK VALLEY WHITMORE LAKE MI 48189 - 9739 FIFTH SOUTH LLC 521 MANDALAY AVE # 1008 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1795 FIRESTONE, GREG PALUMBO, JOHN 440 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 1708 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2519 FLORIDA INVESTMENTS ETC LLC 5525 MERLE HAY ROAD JOHNSON IA 50131 - 1444 • DI VELLO LAND TRUST DI VELLO, FULVIO THE 400 ISLAND WAY # 703 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2134 DIONNE, RICHARD M DIONNE, VICKI 1 4736 ATKINS RD CLYDE TWP MI 48049 - 4504 DOURDOUREKAS, HELEN 44 COMMONS DR PALOS PARK IL 60464 - 1299 ENTRUST OF TAMPA BAY LLC FBO SCOTT LYNDON WILHOIT IRA# 451 CENTRAL PARK DR LARGO FL 33771 - 2143 FARRELL, JOSEPH L FARRELL, MARY E 9058 WOOD VIEW DR PITTSBURGH PA 15237 - 4108 FERNANDEZ, MANUEL C FERNANDEZ, LILLY F 4050 HAVENRIDGE CT MOORPARK CA 93021 - 3721 FINTA, EMERY J THE FINTA, PEGGY K THE 450 GULFVIEW BLVD #608 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2524 FIRETTO, GRACE VIOLA, MARY 509 GLENN AVE EGG HARBOR TOWNSHIP NJ 08234 - 6103 FOULOIS, WILLIAM B FOULOIS, MARA E 10910 BELMONT BLVD MASON NECK VA 22079 - 3823 FOUR FORTY WEST ASSN INC FRANGEDIS, JOAN THE G T LEISURE CORP 450 S GULFVIEW BLVD STE 203 FRANGEDIS, MICHAEL 440 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 406 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2521 1761 ROYAL OAK PL W CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2510 DUNEDIN FL 34698 - 2432 0 :1 GABRIEL, FATHY S GABRIEL, MAGDI GABRIEL, SAID S GABRIEL, TERESA M GABRIEL, SOPHIE GABRIEL, ESMAT A 2399 HERONWOOD DR 15629 BAINTREE WAY 5 WHITE CEDAR LN BLOOMFIELD HILLS MI 48302 - 0835 MISHAWAKA IN 46545 - 1536 HOLMDEL NJ 07733 - 2609 GADDIS, SUSAN L 440 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 305 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2509 GAREL- JONES, PHILIP THE GAREL- JONES, BEATA THE 120 LANDSDOWNE RD S OTTAWA ON K1 M ON4 00030 - CANADA GIADLA, WERONIKA GIADLA, ALOJZY 355 S GULFVIEW BLVD CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2445 GLASBY, ALFRED GLASBY, KIMBERLY 902 BALD EAGLE LAKE RD ORTONVILLE MI 48462 - 8435 GOEMAN, EMMA K THE 440 S GULFVIEW BLVD #1102 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2516 GRATIAS PROERTIES LLC 1359 NW 138TH STE 500 CLIVE IA 50325 - GROSS, ALBERT JAY GROSS, DEBRA H 2215 MUIRFIELD WAY OLDSMAR FL 34677 - 1942 GRUNWALD, REBECCA A TRUST GERBER, SUZANNE J TRUST 1709 FAIRVIEW LAKE GENEVA WI 53147 - 1603 GAERTNER,ADAM GAERTNER, ELISABETH 450 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 507 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2524 GEMMA, FRANK L GEMMA, LAURA A 14 HARBOR WOODS DR SAFETY HARBOR FL 34695 - 5316 GIDARO, ARDO TILFORD, ROSEANNA 16130 WESTON RD KETTLEBY ON LOG 1J0 CANADA GAMBA, WILLIAM C 2062 LAKEVIEW AVE # A BELLMORE NY 11710 - 4244 GHALY, RAMSIS F 11136 INDIAN WOODS DR INDIAN HEAD PK IL 60525 - 4980 GIOTAKIS, WILLIAM C - GIOTAKIS, MARIA 2401 VIRGINIA ST 00030- PARK RIDGE IL 60068 - 2252 GLEAVES, ROBERT N GLISE, JOHN INC 450 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 606 3900 MARKET ST CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2524 CAMP HILL PA 17011 - 4226 GOGEL, EDWARD V GOGEL, EILEEN 60 ENCLAVE DR WINTER HAVEN FL 33884 - GRATIAS PROPERTIES 1350 NW 138TH ST STE 500 CLIVE IA 50325 - 8378 GONTARZ, ALBERT J HASTINGS, SCOTT 396 MAIN ST # 8 1326 YALESVILLE CT 06492 - 6211 GROSS, GARY A GROSS, LINDA L 1905 BUNBURY CT THOMPSONS STN TN 37179 - 9703 GUHL, PATRICIA J TR 440 S GULFVIEW BLVD #706 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2513 GRIMES, WALTER R 450 S GULFVIEW BLVD #403 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2522 GROUT, MARJORIE A THE 9912 CARRINGTON DR KNOXVILLE TN 37923 - 1963 GUIRGUIS, WILSON I GUIRGUIS, FAIZA F 440 GULFVIEW BLVD # 701 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2512 HAJ, FRIDON HANDLEY, ROBERT M HANNA, NASR N ESMKHANI, MOJTABA HANNA, WAFAA H 1501 GULF BLVD #604 10443 GREENDALE DR CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2903 440 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 1402 TAMPA FL 33626 - 5305 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2517 HANNAH, HUGH H III HANNAH, JAYNE F PO BOX 21281 CHATTANOOGA TN 37424 - 0281 HENDRIX, CONNIE 6745 STATE RD WADWORTH OH 44281 - 9727 HODGES, KEITH L 5280 LAKESHORE RD # 510 BURLINGTON ON L7L 5R1 CANADA HUSSEY, JEFFREY S 8120 BRINEGAR CIR TAMPA FL 33647 - 1768 HASANADKA,SHOBHNA #1 8416 ASHLEY OAK WAY KNOXVILLE TN 37923 - 6773 HENNIGAN, MICHAEL G HENNIGAN, CHRISTINE A 2 OSBORN ST STONY POINT NY 10980 - 3651 HOSP, UWE HOSP, INGEBORG A 00030- 450 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 701 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - JASTRZEBSKI, LUBOMIR 450 S GULFVIEW BLVD #1705 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2531 KAMBEROS, GEORGE G KAMBEROS, EUGENIA 10346 S LAPORTE AVE OAK LAWN IL 60453 - 4733 KELLY, MARK E KELLY, ELMETTA 1617 WESTERLY DR BRANDON FL 33511 - 1821 KENIG, EDWARD KENIG, STANISLAWA 433 CORONADO DR CLEARWATER FL 33767 IBRAHIM, FAYEZ THE 2647 LAKE SHORE DR NILES MI 49120 - 9513 JIRKOVSKY, KARL K JIRKOVSKY, CHRISTIANE 450 GULFVIEW BLVD S # 1004 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2528 KARRAS, CAROL M REVOCABLE LIVI 2048 GOVERT DR SCHEREVILLE IN 46375 - 5125 KELLY, MARK KELLY, ELMETTA 445 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 226 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2508 KENNY, HARRY E TRUST KENNY, HARRY E THE 450 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 707 -2506 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2525 KNUTSON,BARBARAF THE 450 S GULFVIEW BLVD #802 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2525 KOCALIS, ANTHONY J KOCALIS, IRENE A 722 KENT RD KENILWORTH IL 60043 - 1032 0 HECKROW, CINDY 603 RUSKIN RD CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 2336 HENSGEN, CAROL W 440 S GULFVIEW BLVD #1706 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2519 HOUSTEAU, RAYMOND F 3620 FAWN DR CANFIELD OH 44406 - 9578 JACOB, MICAH M JACOB, MICHAEL B 450 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 407 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2522 KALLINIKOS, LOUIS KALLINIKOS, KATINA 128 GRAND AVE ETOBICOKE ON M8Y 2Z5 00030 - CANADA KATSETOS, STEVE G 440 GULFVIEW BLVD # 207 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2509 KEMP, SCOTT KEMP, COLLEEN 8703 CHARLESTON HILL CT MASON OH 45040 - 8853 KIRKOWSKI, EDWINA J 450 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 1104 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2528 KOPANAKIS, NICK 757'LOUNSBURY AVE ROCHESTER MI 48307 - 2216 KOVAC, MICHAEL KOVACH, THOMAS J KRONZER, FRANK J 1971 ORANGE CT KOVACH, CONNIE L KRONZER, SHARON L DUNEDIN FL 34698 - 9423 15849 REDINGTON DR 1025 AVERY CREEK DR REDINGTON BEACH FL 33708 - 1743 WOODSTOCK GA 30188 - 2313 • • KUMP, PAUL H LA POINTE, NORMAND J LANI, JOSEPH R KUMP, CORINNE F LA POINTE, LORRAINE J LANI, CAROLE R 610 PRAIRIE ST 450 GULFVIEW BLVD #301 456 WILSON AVE NORTHFIELD MN 55057 - 2624 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2521 STATEN ISLAND NY 10312 - 3730 LASAK, JAMES G JR LIMARDI, R J LISTES, CYNTHIA LASAK, AMY BATES LIMARDI, LAURA LISTES, JOHANNE 25294 COLUMBIA BAY DR 107 HETHERINGTON LN 3965 ALFRED - LALIBERTE LAKE VILLA IL 60046 - 9720 GLENDALE OH 45246 - 3744 BOISBRIAND QC J71-1 1 P7 00030 - CANADA LOCKART, HENRY C LOMBARDO, JOSEPH LOTT, EDWARD C LOCKART, GLENDA K LOMBARDO, JOANNE LOTT, DEBRA E 440 S GULFVIEW BLVD #1106 440 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 1104 208 GREEN AVE CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2516 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2516 FREEPORT NY 11520 - LUCARELLI, QUIRINO JR LUCAS, FRANCIS P LUPIENT, JAMES LUCARELLI, RACHEL LUCAS, JANE P 750 PENNSYLVANIA AVE S 440 GULFVIEW BLVD # 907 10106 MELODY LN MINNEAPOLIS MN 55426 - 1603 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2514 HAGERSTOWN MD 21740 - 9511 LYRAS, LOUIS G MAC QUARRIE, RONALD H THE MAIR, ALOIS LYRAS, KARENA MAC QUARRIE, JOANNE A THE MAIR, DEBRA A 80 CREED CR 1400 GULF BLVD # 801 2903 APPIAN WAY CAMPBELL OH 44405 - 1277 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2830 EASTON PA 18040 - 7706 MAKAR, KYRILLOS B MALATY, KHAIRY A THE MALO, FOTIOS MAKAR, ZEIZAF I MALATY, EBTISAM K THE MALO, ALEXANDRA 669 TOMOKA DR 450 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 901 450 S GULFVIEW BLVD #1501 PALM HARBOR FL 34683 - 5856 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2526 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2530 MAMA'LAKIS, JOHN S MATUSZEK, THERESA MC CAFFERY, MICHAEL G THE MAMALAKIS, THERESE K PROCIUK, THEODORE MC CAFFERY, MARGARET M THE 7850 W 96TH ST 140 MANCHESTER DR # 210 46 -1 REVERE RD BLOOMINGTON MN 55438 - 2913 BUFFALO GROVE IL 60089 - 2422 DREXEL HILL PA 19026 - 5328 MC DONALD, VIVIAN A MC GOVERN, JASON L MECAS LLC MC DONALD, BRENT E MC GOVERN, KATHERINE G 1628 SYLVIA DR 440 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 1602 2620 SWEET BROOM LN ENDICOTT NY 13760 - 7145 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2518 NAPERVILLE IL 60564 - 4325 MEYER, JOHN MILLER, ALAN H MICH, PATRICIA J MEYER, BARBARA 140 LN 570A LK JAMES MILLER, MARY G 440 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 1401 FREMONT IN 46737 - 9002 1174 WAUKAZOO DR CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2517 HOLLAND MI 49424 - 2637 MINIERI, CARL N MITCHELL, THOMAS E REVOCABLE MOORE, FRANCIS H MINIERI, IDLE T MOORE, CLAIRE 440 GULFVIEW BLVD # 908 3728 S EASTPARK WAY 440 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 1501 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - HOMOSASSA FL 34448 - 2801 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2518 MORRILL, DANIEL MORRILL, SANDY 2029 W MANITOU DR OWOSSO MI 48867 - 8727 NICKELS, JOHN H NICKELS, MARY ELLEN 426 LOWELL DR HIGHLAND HEIGHTS OH 44143 - 3616 NOVICK, CAROL A 112 LITCHFIELD LN HOUSTON TX 77024 - 6016 •MULLIGAN, JAMES STORY, THERESA A 44 PANAMOKA TRL RIDGE NY 11961 - 2202 NIKANA HOLDINGS LLC 739 HARBOR IS CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1805 O'CONNOR, DANIEL O'CONNOR, DEBORAH L 17796 WALL CIR REDINGTON SHORES FL 33708 - 1248 O'DONNELL, GERARD OLSSON, WILLIAM H O'DONNELL, JACKIE OLSSON, LYNNE A 3 PACKHORSE LN 15913 DOVER CLIFFE DR WYHALL BIRINGHAM B47 5DH 00000 LUTZ FL 33548 - 6197 UNITED KINGDOM ORN, DUANE L 5415 BROOKLYN BLVD MINNEAPOLIS MN 55429 - 3359 PANGERE, GEORGIANN M 13010 MONROE PL CROWN POINT IN 46307 - 9588 PARSONS, GARY C 6445 MEADOWBROOK Cl WORTHINGTON OH 43085 - 2864 PEARL, PENNY G 450 S GULFVIEW BLVD #603 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2524 PENNINGTON, JANICE THE 450 GULFVIEW BLVD # 501 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2522 PALASKY, JON R SR 450 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 202 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2521 PAPAGEORGIOU, DEMETRIOS G PAPAGEORGIOU, LIZA 5310 LONG MEADOW RD BLOOMFIELD HILL MI 48304 - 3660 PARSONS, GARY C DOUGLAS, MARY E TRUST 6445 MEADOWBROOK CIR WORTHINGTON OH 43085 - 2864 PELICAN POINTE ON CLEARWATER B 445 SOUTH GULFVIEW BLVD CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2508 PERLIN, MICHAEL PERLIN, JODI 1970 PROMENADE WAY CLEARWATER FL 33760 - 1734 MUTLU, ULKER 450 S GULFVIEW BLVD #908 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2526 NORRIS, KELLIE M 6811 SPRINGVIEW DR WESTERVILLE OH 43082 - 8567 O'CONNOR, EDWARD L O'CONNOR, JENNIFER L 1101 OXBRIDGE DR LUTZ FL 33549 - 9397 O'NEIL, JOHN T THE 20 MONAHANSETT RD MASHPEE MA 02649 - 4742 PALERMO, PAMELA J PALERMO, LOUIS M 1855 JESSICA RD CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 1508 PAPPAS, KELLIE 440 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 1006 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2516 PATSIS, STEVE PATSIS, EMANUEL 157 N AL•LEGHANY AVE LINDENHURST NY 11757 - 4129 PENDLEY, CORBETT WAYNE PENDLEY, JANE 464 ADAMS ST DENVER CO 80206 - 4411 PIAZZA, LENO P ZORZIT, MARK J 443 ROWELL AVE SAULT ST MARIE ON P6C 5L3 00030 CANADA PITZULO, SAMUEL J POLSTON, STEPHEN M PONTIKOS, IRENE PITZULO, JANET M POLSTON, JEAN M 450 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 303 440 JANET DR 28215 BOULDER CIR CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2521 CANFIELD OH 44406 - 1532 EXCELSIOR MN 55331 - 8325 PORTER, CHARLES D POZIOS, THOEFANIS PORTER, PATRICIA A POZIOS, KOULA 15411 OAKWOOD DR 825 MICHIGAN AVE URBANDALE IA 50323 — 1928 MARYSVILLE MI 48040 — 2122 PROKOP, MARILYN M 450 S GULFVIEW BLVD #1006 CLEARWATER FL 33767 — 2528 RACHOWICZ, EDWARD RACHOWICZ, MAE 440 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 1502N CLEARWATER FL 33767 — 2518 REESE, POLLY C PO BOX 400 MIDDLESBORO KY 40965 — 0400 ROPP, WALTER S 440 S GULFVIEW BLVD #1503N CLEARWATER FL 33767 — 2518 RYAN— KOUDELKA, DEBORAH A 450 S GULFVIEW BLVD #706 CLEARWATER FL 33767 — 2525 SALIB, HANY Y GUIRGUIS, MERAY 11 COBBLERS CIR FRANKLIN PARK NJ 08823 — 1780 SAVOIE, ROSEMARIE 450 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 1001 CLEARWATER FL 33767 — SCHAFFER, GEORGE A 675 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 406 CLEARWATER FL 33767 — 2657 PRYOR,CAROL 450 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 907 CLEARWATER FL 33767 — 2526 RAMASWAMY, ASHOK 450 S GULFVIEW BLVD #708 CLEARWATER FL 33767 — 2525 REK, WILLIAM J REK, LISA A 6240 70TH AVE PINELLAS PARK FL 33781 — 4169 ROSENSTEEL, DANIEL S 17082 DOLPHIN DR REDINGTON SHORES FL 33708 — 1324 SAAD, FATHY Z SHENODA, SAMIRA S 2626 DURANT OAKS DR VALRICO FL 33594 — 5932 SALNIKOV, ALEXANDER 212 E SCRANTON AVE LAKE BLUFF IL 60044 — 2532 SAYROO, MICHAEL PO BOX 15736 TAMPA FL 33684 — 5736 SCHNEIDER, ROGER B SCHNEIDER, LYNETTE V 440 S GULFVIEW BLVD #707 CLEARWATER FL 33767 — 2513 PRATO, EDWARD DIERSCH, RAYMOND 74 LOIS CT E EAST MEADOW NY 11554 — 1412 QUERUBIN, KATHERINE 627 SAXONY BLVD lo ST PETERSBURG FL 33716 — 1297 REED, AUDREY L 450 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 902 CLEARWATER FL 33767 — 2526 RICKS, WALTER A SR THE RICKS, MILDRED H THE 440 S GULFVIEW BLVD #903 CLEARWATER FL 33767 — 2514 RUCKNAGEL, MELBA A THE RUCKNAGEL FAMILY TRUST 8812 FOX PARK DR SAINT LOUIS MO 63126 — 2310 SAINT GEORGE INVESTMENT INC 2227 KENT PL CLEARWATER FL 33764 — 6624 SANTOSTEFANO, ROBERT J FAMILY SANTOSTEFANO, OSCAR 14800 GREEN VIEW RD ORLAND PARK IL 60462 — 1994 SCHAAF, MICHAEL L MUDIE, AUDREY 450 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 506 CLEARWATER FL 33767 — 2524 SCHULTE, CHARLES W SCHULTE, COLLEEN M 3723 LAKEWOOD SHORES DR HOWELL MI 48843 — 7889 SCHWALBE, MARTIN E SCHWARTZ, JOHN SCICCHITANO, ANTHONY F SCHWALBE, GLENDA J 145 MARINA DEL RAY CT SCICCHITANO, JANICE M 139 HAMILTON RIVER RD CLEARWATER FL 33767 — 2944 2701 ASTON AVE LABRADOR NL AOP 1 EO 00030 — PLANT CITY FL 33566 — 9594 CANADA SCIMONE, PETER L SCIMONE, ROSALIE L 450 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 1003 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2526 SNAPPY, WILLIAM A SNAPPY, PATRICIA L 109 CHENEY HILL LN RUTLAND VT 05701 - 8847 SHERRY, BEATRICE 828 WATER ST MEADVILLE PA 16335 - 3452 SILVONEN, LINDA J 26501 S RIVER RD HARRISON TOWNSHIP MI 48045 - 5613 SLEDZ, WILLIAM H SLEDZ, SHARON R 450 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 307 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2521 SOFRONAS, JAMES SOFRONAS, CHRISTINE 431 GULFVIEW BLVD CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2508 SORSOK, NAZEEH S YOUSEF, MANAL G 2237 CLIMBING IVY DR TAMPA FL 33618 - 1712 STAMIS, CONSTANTINE STAMIS, ETHEL R 505 MANAWA TR MT PROSPECT IL 60056 - 3719 SUESS, BERNARD H 1100 OLD POST RD PERKASIE PA 18944 - 1582 SEURYNCK, ELIZABETH THE 440 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 1101 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2516 SHAW, WILLIAM M SHAW, GEORGINA 450 S GULFVIEW BLVD #1508 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2530 SHIRSAT, SHAM S SHIRSAT, MADHAVI S 28 CAMBRIDGE DR OAK BROOK IL 60523 - 1705 SIMMONS, JEAN M MC CULLOUGH, GARY S 857 SUNDANCE CIR OSHAWA ON L1J 865 00030 - CANADA SMERLING, GEORGETTE 38 OLD DAIRY RD TRUMBULL CT 06611 - 4954 SOLIMAN FAMILY ENTERPRISES LLC 7533 JOMEL DR SPRING HILL FL 34607 - 2018 SOUTH TAMPA LAND TRUST LLC 3825 HENDERSON BLVD # 600 TAMPA FL 33629 - 5032 STASIK, ALBIN STASIK, BRONISLAW 1180 GULF BLVD # 406 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2756 SUTHERLAND, PEGGY E 450 S GULFVIEW BLVD #1504 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2530 • SGOUPIS, JAMES SGOUPIS, ANNE 137 93RD ST BROOKLYN NY 11209 - 6201 SHELDAHL, ERIC A 3815 NW 109TH ST URBANDALE IA 50322 - SIDKY, EMIL Y SIDKY, SONYA M 5451 S WOODLAWN AVE # 3 CHICAGO IL 60615 - 5209 SIRABELLA, LOUIS SIRABELLA, JEANETTE C 750 ISLAND WAY # 501 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1821 SOBIESZCZYK, HARRY A JR 581 N 4TH AVE ADDISON IL 60101 - 2273 SOLU, EMINE F THE SOLU, SULEYMAN S THE 450 S GULFVIEW BLVD #1603 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2531 SPANOS, JOHANNA REVOCABLE TRUS 514 MEDINA DR ST LOUIS MO 63122 - 1430 STRAMAGLIA, JOHN STRAMAGLIA, JEANNINE L 4025 GOSS SCHILLER PARK IL 60176 - 1827 ,SWANK, CHRISTOPHER P SWANK, JESSICA 151 DAHLIA DR ROMEOVILLE IL 60446 - 4879 T W /BEACH RESIDENCES- THOMAS, FRANKLIN J THOMAS, NABIL S CLEARWATE THOMAS, JOYCE E THOMAS SAMIA 877 EXECUTIVE CENTER DR 8364 GOLDEN PRAIRIE DR 440 GULFVIEW BLVD # 504 ST PETERSBURG FL 33702 - 2460 TAMPA FL 33647 - 3241 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 0 0 TIDD, VICKI A TIKRITI, GARY D THE TIRUPATHI, PANEENDRA FAMILY TR TIDD, JAMES A 2849 CHANCERY LN 8186 ELISABETH LN 440 GULFVIEW BLVD # 1403 CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 1427 LARGO FL 33777 - 1352 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2517 TIRUPATHI, SIRISH K TRAKAS, ANNA THE TRUHAN, JOSEPH G TIRUPATI, SRIVANI 1616 SHERIDAN RD # 10G 440 S GULFVIEW BLVD #1007 2133 GLENCOE HILLS DR # 6 WILMETTE IL 60091 - 1851 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2516 ANN ARBOR MI 48108 - 1043 TSATALIS, MARINA C TYLER, NORMAN R UHLMAN, JAMES P 440 GULFVIEW BLVD S # 1203 TYLER, STEPHANIE UHLMAN, SUSAN C CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 440 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 1204 2399 COLLINS DR CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2517 WORTHINGTON OH 43085 - 2808 USHER, CEDRIC USHER, SHEILA WAFAA, HANNA WARD, THOMAS G 40 CASTLE AVE 440 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 1402 2817 ROEHAMPTON CLOSE 40 CASTLE DUBLIN 3 00000 - CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2517 TARPON SPRINGS FL 34688 - 8426 IRELAND WECHSLER, RENATE THE WEEDEN, SAM W WEGLARZ, RUSSELL J 450 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 1101 WEEDEN, BETTIE I WEGLARZ, LAURIE A CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2528 440 S GULFVIEW BLVD #703 13410 WOOD DUCK DR CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2513 PLAINFIELD IL 60585 - 7766 WEIS, JAY B WERTH, KENNETH D STWOOD, JOHN P WEIS, ERIK J WERTH, PAMELA A WE WE 40 # 8 2227 7TH ST NW 120 BARRINGTON CIR CLEARWATER FL GULFVIEW BLVD VD # - 8 ROCHESTER MN 55901 - 0206 ALPENA MI 49707 - 4101 WILLIAMS, MARCUS DOYLE WILLARD, GILLIAN M WOLAK, CARRIE A 440 S GULFVIEW BLVD #807 9005 S O CARMEN M 42 EVERGREENE CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2514 9005 STONEL 2031 3 WALLINGFORD CT 06492 - 2975 FAIRFAX VA 22031 - 3243 WOOLUM, KAYETTE WOOLUM, KERRY L WYROZEMSKI, WALTER 201 DEAN HILL DR WINKLER, DWIGHT L WYROZEMSKI, MARY PINEVILLE KY 40977 - 1812 528 KENTUCKY AVE 450 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 1107 PINEVILLE KY 40977 - 1343 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2528 YANTEK, MINERVA M YOWELL, KENNETH P ZIELINSKI, DETLEF R 450 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 1008S YOWELL, CINDY W ZIELINSKI, MONIKA CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2528 132 ALBEMARLE DR 440 S GULFVIEW BLVD #805 PENLLYN PA 19422 - 1127 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2513 ZIMMERMANN, GUNDER ZUGALJ, IVON J 312 WINDWARD IS ZUGALJ, MILKA CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2327 1044 E 165TH ST SOUTH HOLLAND IL 60473 - 2573 AGLO PROPERTIES LLC BAKER, ROBERT E GONTARZ, ALBERT J C/O OLGA CATALINA REYES MBR BAKER, ANN E HASTINGS, SCOTT 27 DOVE TRACE CIRCLE 440 S GULFVIEW BLVD #607 19 HAMPTON TRAIL THE WOODLANDS TX 77382 CLEARWATER FL 33767 WALLINGFORD CT 06492 -2617 MEYER, JOHN NIKANA HOLDINGS LLC RAMASWAMY, ASHOK MEYER, BARBARA 421 S. GULFVIEW BLVD 179 MARINA DEL RAY CT AVENUE CLEARWATER, FL 33767 CLEARWATER, FL 33767 -2994 BEN SALEMLEM, PA 19020 EN SAAD, FATHY Z THOMAS, NABIL S TIDD, VICKI A SHENODA, SAMIRA S THOMAS, SAMIA TIDD, JAMES A 20353 CHESTNUT GROVE DR 1145 -86TH STREET 5861 ROGERS ROAD TAMPA, FL 33647 -3345 DOWNERS GROVE, IL 60516 JAMESTOWN, OH 45335 TIRUPATHI, PANEEDRA FAMILY TR TSATALIS, MARINA C WEIS, JAY B 7625 LEATHER FERN CT 1379 EDGEWOOD ROAD WEIS, ERIK J PINELLAS PARK, FL 33782 -4318 YARDLEY, PA 19067 -4402 7645 LYNDALE AVE S MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55423 440 GULFVIEW LLC TROUPE, BRIAN B BOSEEN, EDWARD J 750 PENNSYLVANIA AVE S TROUPE, MARY BETH BOESEN, MAUREEN A MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55426 -1603 21 CHATHAM DR 2066 AVE S #1200 BEDFORD, NH 03110 DES MOINES IA 50309 PONTIKOS, DEAN B SPEELMAN; DAVID E CITY OF CLEARWATER PONTIKOS, KELI 6199 VIAKEN RD ATTN: CASH & INVESTMENTS MGR 15606 POMEROY BLVD HOPEWELL, OH 43746 PO BOX 4748 CLEARWATER, FL STRONGSVILLE OH 44136 33758 -4748 SALT BLOCK 57, L.L.C. PINELLAS COUNTY CLEARWATER BEACH ASSOCIATION C/O OCEAN PROPERTIES LTD ATTN; PARK DEPT JAY KEYES, , 1001 EAST ATLANTIC AVENUE, 315 COURT STREET 100 DEVON DRIVE SUITE 202 CLEARWATER, FL 33756 -5165 CLEARWATER, FL 33767; DELRAY BEACH, FL 33483 8 8 0 s s Clearwater B Ownership Project LEGAL DESCRIPTION A tract of Iand consisting of Lots 33. 34 and 35 and pad of Lot 36 of LLOYD- WHITE- SKINNER SUBDIVISION. according to the map or plat ' thereof, as recorded n Plat Book 13 pages 12 and 13 of the public records of Pinellas County. Florida and Lands and Submerged lands tying between aiW Southerly. Southwestedy or Westerly of the mean high water mark and the Bulkhead Line described in and set ford in Trustees of the Internal Imprwemem Fund of the State of Florida Disclaimer No. 22310. as recorded in O.R. Book 765, page 542, of the public records of Pinellas County, Florida. said Vail being described as follows: Begin at an iron pin at the Northeast Comer of said Lot 33 and the West right -of -way margin of Gulf View Boulevard. said point being the True Point of Beginning, said point being the PC of a curve to the left having a radius of 847,00 feet and an am distance of 235.76 feet thence run along said curve to the tell and along the West right -of -way, V­ margin of Gulf V Boulevard a chord bearing of South 20'17'10' East and a chord distance of 235.00 feel to an iron pin; thence run SCUM 68'55'27' West for a distance of 402.14 feel to an iron pin „said point tieing. the PC of a Curve to the right having a radius of 1247.00 feet and an arc d'RtanOe of 296.79 feet: thence run along Said curve to the right a chord bearing of North 19'07'51' West and a chord distance of 296.09 feet to an iron pin: thence run North 77'41'16' East for a distance of 400.00 feel to a point and back to the True Point of Beginning. Containing 106504.22 sq. R or 2.45 acres more or less. Notes: All field measurements matched record dimensions (Vesting Deed as recorded in O.R. Book 765, Page 542 on Ole in the Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida.) within the precision requirements of ALTA/ACSM specR Eons. The property shown and described hereon is the same properly as described in Me Tae Commitment No. 40l866D3FCJWXO3- O02170MCS of Commonwealth Land Title Insurance Company beamTg an effective date of October 16, 2003. I ALL MATERIALS AND CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE MORE STRINGENT TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS AS FOUND IN THE STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER OR THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS AS PREPARED BY FLORIDA DESIGN CONSULTANTS. INC. SPECIFICALLY FOR THIS PROJECT. 2. THE JURISDICTIONAL AGENCY FOR THIS PROJECT 6 THE CITY OF CLEARWATER. 3. THE LOCATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES ARE APPROXIMATE AS SHOWN ON THE PLANS AND IT IS THE CONTRACTORS RESPONSIBILITY TO DETERMINE THE EXACT LOCATION OF THE UTILITIES PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION IN THEIR MIN - THE CONTRACTOR SHALL USE APPROPRIATE MEASURES TD PREVENT EROSION AND TRANSPORT OF SEDIMENT MAIERAL TO INLETS. SURFACE DRAINS, W ES AND WETLAND AREAS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL USE STRAW RATES. SILT BARRIERS OR OTHER APPROPRIATE MEASURES TO MMGATE ADVERSE IMPACTS TO EXISTING SURFACE WATER QUALITY. 5. THE CONTRACTOR 5 TO CONTROL ALL FUGITNE DUST ORIGINATING ON THE PROJECT BY WATERING OR OTHER METHODS AS REQUIRED. 6. NO DEBRS SHALL BE ALLOWED TO ENTER THE EXISTING SANITARY AND STORM SYSTEMS. 7. ARCHITECTURAL INFORMATION PROVIDED BY ARCHITECTS. 8. BACKFLOW PREVENTION DEVICES MUST BE INSTALLED BY THE CITY. 9. LOCATIONS OF TRASH DUMPSTER TO BE COORDINATED WITH THE CITY OF CLEARWATER. 1D. SITE LANDSCAPING WILL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 3 -1202 OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE 11. THE SITE IS LOCATED WITHIN FLOOD ZONE AE. BASE FLOOD ELEVATION 12; ZONE VE. BASE FLOOD ELEVATIONS to AND 16 PER FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP COMMUNITY PANEL NOS. 12103CO102G Y 123 0104G. MAP REVISED SEPTEMBER 3. 2003, 12. SITE LIGHTING SHALL BE PROVIDED IN COMPLIANCE WITH CITY OF CLEARWATER CODE REOU1ROVENTS AND SHALL BE DIRECTED DOWNWARD AND AWAY FROM ADJACENT RESIDENTAL AREAS. ADDITIONALLY. LIGHTING WILL BE DIRECTED AWAY FROM THE BEACH ZONE IN CONFORMANCE WITH SEA TURTLE NESTING GUIDEUNES PROMULGATED BY THE FUDRIDA FISH k WILDLIFE CONSERVATION COMMISSION (FT&WCC). PLEASE REFER TO LANDSCAPE PLANS BY PHIL GRAHAM AND ASSOCIATES. 11 DRAINAGE FOR ALL PARKING LEVELS UNDER THE BUILDING WILL BE DIRECTED TO THE PROPOSED DRAINAGE SYSTEM TO ACCOMMODATE WATER OUAUTY REQUIREMENTS FOR THE PROJECT. 1+. TREE REMOVAL PERMIT APPUCATION TO BE SUBMITTED AT TIME OF CONSTRUCTION PLAN SUBMITTAL 15, MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL FOR THE CONDOMINIUM SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ROLLING OUT DUMPSTERS TO STALING AREA ON COLLECTION DAYS. 16. BUILDING TO BE SPRINKLERED. y 17. THE TWO (2) REOUIRED FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTIONS (FDC) SHALL BE AT LEAST 15' FROM BUILDING AND LOCATED NO CLOSER THAN 25 FEET AND NO FURTHER THAN 50 FEET FROM THE NEAREST FIRE HYDRANT ASSEMBLY (FHA). `L OWNER CIVIL ENGINEER TAYLOR WOODROW - U.S. TOWER DIVISION FLORIDA DESIGN CONSULTANTS INC. 8430 ENTERPRISE CIRCLE 3030 STARKEY BLVD. SUITE 100 NEW PORT PORT RICHEY, FL 34655 BRADENTON. FL 34202 PHONE: 727- 849 -7588 PHONE: 941 -554 -2082 FAX: 727- 848 -3648 FAX: 941 - HOTEL ZONING DISTRICT LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT ARCHITECTURAL TEAM PHIL GRAHAM STUDIO HELMON HURLEY CHARVAT 436 SECOND STREET NORTH PEACDCK /ARCHITECT, INC ST. PETERSBURG, FL 33701 222 WEST MAITLAND BLVD. PHONE: 727 -821 -5225 MAITLAND, FL 32751 FAX: 727- 826 -1626 PHONE: 407 -644 -2656 TOTAL 106.50+ SF FAX: 407- 628 -3269 M1 k1� TA MI E7 Clearwater, Florida Site Plan SECTION 7, TOWNSHIP 29 S, RANGE 15 E PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA AT/'1AI' \LAO - UNIT COUNT NUMBER OE LEVEL ROOMS 16 9 15 9 9 13 10 12 13 22 10 26 9 22 8 27 7 27 6 27 5 2+ 0 3 0 2 0 0 TOTAL 230 PREPARED FOR: TAYLOR WOODROW - U.S. TOWER DIVISION 8430 ENTERPRISE CIRCLE . SUITE 100 BRADENTON, FL 34202 TEL (941)554 -2000 FAX (941) 554 -3005 PREPARED BY: o FLORIDA DESIGN CONSULTANTS, INC. ENGINEERS, ENVIRONMENTALISTS, SURVEYORS 8 PLANNERS 3030 Siorkey Blvd, New Pori Richey FL 34,555 Tel: (727) 849 -7588 Fax: (727) 848 -3648 E.B. No. 7421 SHEET SHEET DESCRIPTION 1 COVER SHEET 2 EXISTING CONDITIONS 3 -5 SITE PLAN 6 STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN AND CSWMP 7 -9 PAVING, GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN 10• UTILITY PLAN 10A• FIRE DEPARTMENT ACCESS PLAN 11.12 PAVING, GRADING AND DRAINAGE DETAILS 13• UTILITY DETAILS SHEETS ARE NOT INCLUDED IN SWFWMD PLANS 1 ll/­ PROJECT DATUM iS988 RECEIVED DEC13 2007 FLD 2004 -09068 DATE 10 /31/07 JOB NO. 699 -271 PLANNING DEPARTMENT EPN #209 LANLJ UZI= UH I H FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS [2] EXISTING PROPOSED REQUIRED (MIN /MAX) HOTEL ZONING DISTRICT T (TOURIST) T (TOURIST) T (TOURIST) OS /R (OPEN SPACE (RECREATION) OS /R (OPEN SPACE (RECREATX#) USE HOTEL HOTEL (F.ESNARE) - LOT AREA TOTAL 105.50A SF TOTAL 106.50+ SF 20.000 SF 2.+5 AC 2.+5 AC AREA ZONED TOURIST. T LANDWARD 81450 SF LANDWARD BI 450 SF - Or SEAWALL 1.87 AC OF SEAWALL 1.87 AC LOT WIDTH 236 238 IOp' BUILDING COVERAGE (GROUND FLOOR) 32.729 SF 60,730 SF FAR I.0 IMPERMEABLE SURFACE RATIO 1.68 AC (So') 1.51 AC (BUS) ISR 955 73.157 SF 65.606 SF NUMBER Or UNITS 217 (HOTEL ROOMS) 230 ROOMS - [ +][B] DENSITY (SEE TABLE AT LEFT) 217 HOTEL ROOMS 1.117 AC -116 U /AC 230 UNITS 1.87 - 23 U /AC - SETBACKS FROM PROPERTY LINE SETBACKS (BUILDINGS) FRONT (EAST) 2B' I5' SIDE (NORTH) 19' (TO CANOPY) f0' 0' -10' SIDE (SOUTH) 31' t0' C' -10' REAR (WEST) FROM SEAWALL IS (TO BAR HUT) 20' 0' -20' SETBACKS (TO TOWERS) FRONT (EAST) 15' SIDE (NORTH) t0' 0' -10' SIDE (SOUTH) 10' 0' -TO' REAR (WEST) FROM SEAWALL 20' 0' -20' SETBACKS (OTHER STRUCTURES) FRONT (EAST) 0' 0' -15' SIDE (NORTH) Z' 0' (TO SIDEWALK) o' -10' SIDE (SOUTH) 1' 3' (TO SIDEWALK) k 0' (TO PAVEMENT) REAR (WEST) FROM SEAWALL 0' B (TO SIDEWALK) 0' -20' SETBACKS FROM CCCL SIDE (NORTH) 13' 7' TO BLDG. 0' TO SIDEWALK TO' REAR (WEST) 1' (TO BAND SHELL) 8' TO BLDG. 0' TO SIDEWALK 20' HEIGHT [1) 1+5.5' NORTH TOWER - 150' 0- [3] 150' SOUTH TOWER - 99' + PAVED VEHICULAR AREAS 12.163 SF 1.BR9 SF PARKING LOT INTERIOR LANDSCAPING +.105 SF 3,018 SF 10y- (SF AND . OF PAVED AHICUIR USE AREA) 335 160. PARKING TOTAL 201 iGB SPACES [7.8] 230 SPACES (7) HANDICAP (INCLUDED IN TOTAL NUMBER) TO H/C 9 H/C - 9 H/C (t) HEIGHT IS ELEVATION ABOVE FEMA BASE ELEVATION -16-. 12] RE REMENTS ARE BASED ON FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS (LEVEL 2). [ }� SEE ARCHITECTS PLANS FOR HEIGHTS OF OTHER. LOWER. PORTIONS OF BUILDINGS. [+ MAXIMUM NUMBER OF UNITS IS 230 HOTEL [5] PLEASE REFER TO THE DENSITY TABLE FOR THE BREAKDOWN OF UNIT PROVENANCE (6) BASED ON THE LAND AREA ZONED T. TOURST DISTRICT E7] PARKING REWIREMENTS HOTEL 230 SPACES I /ROOM 230 - Ill] 1 ll/­ PROJECT DATUM iS988 RECEIVED DEC13 2007 FLD 2004 -09068 DATE 10 /31/07 JOB NO. 699 -271 PLANNING DEPARTMENT EPN #209 PROJECT DATUM iS988 RECEIVED DEC13 2007 FLD 2004 -09068 DATE 10 /31/07 JOB NO. 699 -271 PLANNING DEPARTMENT EPN #209 �:, �_ i i � � f - I j ` ' i - � r: � � ` ,: e .. . _ -t' - -. � . {,_ ,. .a _ - � .. � � "s y9 ` b` 6: X03 � Ot�j °Rt bry ab 5 95 y9 hbo '•,bi$ 6606 /�gROKEN ASPN 6e: �zo- 43: ®t % t , to i bp • �'l o'L $'%� t m- s ° O P, M 6 ?` �° GRASS d o T o gym' O NO PPT\O 2. O 0° ®t �° ®�• e.i O O -s , e9 e 4 ?� rt D \P g92 AY METAL ST ER ( 2: \ ® Sn _ .9`ry PHPPPC�SG NO STEPS r^ ®' O 9�'b PS» SN °tG PP - E E•�, SAS $ Q \P \E o � � y bti o. '� e•`o o � E 5' �' � y° by Ty .9,\ 1 RESCN °ON �0 "1G 5 _ � BLVD 6�h • .° `1 "Y"O `0 5 z- ' by y 437 S G� pT5 ABOVE \ ° \/� �PNOSGPPE ®1 FRANGEUSLI')OANIC TRUSTEE °- v+°pO �2 e (t °° 0 .� 6. '1 �h f \ tt' V�1 4 y •y J 0 S. GULFVIEW BLVD °oo Z EL b 430 ZONE VE N V ZONE VE (EL T S W LVD r btiy (NAVD1 8) (NAVD1 88) \\ pg\\.E SPYEOj Q - \t Pia "abbao 3 445 CONDOMNkjARWATER BEACH CLE ,g • \ b� ols \�MPDDPOSZE Q. fj / \� oRt� 1 a.'4�' Q PELICANCp�DO PSS0CIA ION. INC. ,00 � 2gg 0 PSPH � \ b Poe, y. J O } 0�6 D o14 GE SW,30� Is A s 0 h 6 \ ® o \/ ZONE VE 3 c�# o W \ �n c (EL 16) .86 rn- A7 Vie. c, ®® tie M � 2- A. (NAND 86) WPIoNMN52�S ®bti 0 60�' Is 'bg , t5 t3- yh °P , ^' \ 6:9 tt�� COIU D9 q a0�0 vo• � 12• \ ® z 6 o1R ;,GONG e ya E N4\ °• tD' by. P bh • ba y 6S .1ti 0� OoNG 69 b R\M,0 g0 SPPJ ygy J 6.9 NGF, ,(l0 , \ /' bery 12' b q 9 q 12 12 E Mi0- 6' LVD ORIGINAL 6. S_ GULFVIEW B RECENED O °q e /'� btiti �ti , y9 FOUR FORTY WESMIASS CIATION, INC. y \ DEC 13 2007 \8 RCP 9q ti� yeti \ . PLANNING DEPARTMENT E h CITY OF CLEARWATER n° \ ' 0 PREPARED FOR, SHEET DESCRIPTION, �Yoc Taylor Woodrow - U.S. Tower Division CLEARWATER BEACH VACATION G99 -271 ■�7� FLORIDA DESIGN CONSULTANTS, INC. 8430 ENTERPRISE CIRCLE OWNERSHIP PROJECT :09 2 0^JMS,SDD ENGINEERS, ENVIRONMENTALISTS, SURVEYORS 8 PLANNERS SUITE 100 EXISTING CONDITIONS c,�acu .0 ce. 3030 (iz-) 31-d. Fl—y) FL 34655 BRADE NT ON, FLORIDA 34202 FP., pzT 898 -3698 TEL (941)554-2000 FAX (941) 554 -3005 010131/07 13 E.B. No. 7421 �t eh � N ADO PARKING LOTATER • A� CIT`( OF CLEARW ' coNC s/W M wv FVIEW BLVD 43TAILW�ApT5RA8�NE, y P PMio-,a- 1 0yA Ir ,o• RS SOFRONAS HJAMES eyti s r +�. O to 20 +o P, Pyi h` P P9 1 s R 1D• A0 b y` yti b 09 O CONC S/W h y� V0 E/P R- e• yb�' yhbti A y9 ` b` 6: X03 � Ot�j °Rt bry ab 5 95 y9 hbo '•,bi$ 6606 /�gROKEN ASPN 6e: �zo- 43: ®t % t , to i bp • �'l o'L $'%� t m- s ° O P, M 6 ?` �° GRASS d o T o gym' O NO PPT\O 2. O 0° ®t �° ®�• e.i O O -s , e9 e 4 ?� rt D \P g92 AY METAL ST ER ( 2: \ ® Sn _ .9`ry PHPPPC�SG NO STEPS r^ ®' O 9�'b PS» SN °tG PP - E E•�, SAS $ Q \P \E o � � y bti o. '� e•`o o � E 5' �' � y° by Ty .9,\ 1 RESCN °ON �0 "1G 5 _ � BLVD 6�h • .° `1 "Y"O `0 5 z- ' by y 437 S G� pT5 ABOVE \ ° \/� �PNOSGPPE ®1 FRANGEUSLI')OANIC TRUSTEE °- v+°pO �2 e (t °° 0 .� 6. '1 �h f \ tt' V�1 4 y •y J 0 S. GULFVIEW BLVD °oo Z EL b 430 ZONE VE N V ZONE VE (EL T S W LVD r btiy (NAVD1 8) (NAVD1 88) \\ pg\\.E SPYEOj Q - \t Pia "abbao 3 445 CONDOMNkjARWATER BEACH CLE ,g • \ b� ols \�MPDDPOSZE Q. fj / \� oRt� 1 a.'4�' Q PELICANCp�DO PSS0CIA ION. INC. ,00 � 2gg 0 PSPH � \ b Poe, y. J O } 0�6 D o14 GE SW,30� Is A s 0 h 6 \ ® o \/ ZONE VE 3 c�# o W \ �n c (EL 16) .86 rn- A7 Vie. c, ®® tie M � 2- A. (NAND 86) WPIoNMN52�S ®bti 0 60�' Is 'bg , t5 t3- yh °P , ^' \ 6:9 tt�� COIU D9 q a0�0 vo• � 12• \ ® z 6 o1R ;,GONG e ya E N4\ °• tD' by. P bh • ba y 6S .1ti 0� OoNG 69 b R\M,0 g0 SPPJ ygy J 6.9 NGF, ,(l0 , \ /' bery 12' b q 9 q 12 12 E Mi0- 6' LVD ORIGINAL 6. S_ GULFVIEW B RECENED O °q e /'� btiti �ti , y9 FOUR FORTY WESMIASS CIATION, INC. y \ DEC 13 2007 \8 RCP 9q ti� yeti \ . PLANNING DEPARTMENT E h CITY OF CLEARWATER n° \ ' 0 PREPARED FOR, SHEET DESCRIPTION, �Yoc Taylor Woodrow - U.S. Tower Division CLEARWATER BEACH VACATION G99 -271 ■�7� FLORIDA DESIGN CONSULTANTS, INC. 8430 ENTERPRISE CIRCLE OWNERSHIP PROJECT :09 2 0^JMS,SDD ENGINEERS, ENVIRONMENTALISTS, SURVEYORS 8 PLANNERS SUITE 100 EXISTING CONDITIONS c,�acu .0 ce. 3030 (iz-) 31-d. Fl—y) FL 34655 BRADE NT ON, FLORIDA 34202 FP., pzT 898 -3698 TEL (941)554-2000 FAX (941) 554 -3005 010131/07 13 E.B. No. 7421 �t C 1 CURVE TABLE 1 ! �:zia)t •./ 1 CURVE RADIUS LENGTH CHORD BEARING DELTA BEACH WALK. 4us -G C1 t2h 7.00' 296.]9' 296.09' S190]'St'E L St 9'10'13 "E F 133e'12' PARKING LOT C2 eh] DO' 235.]6' 235.00' N20T]'t 0" L N20'20'02'w F t5'S6'S3- �L•C•L ✓,'. -') - �1 CITY OF CLEAR WATER A 1i : PROPOSED FENCE (SEE LANDSCAPE I ARCHITE CCCL CT FOR 11 / I DETAILS) / _ -- I .— U':C 9 .V UPPER LEVEL LIMITS (TIP) - ';� S77'38'241'W(C,F) 400Afj'(L)„ 312.53'(F) ,;�«- '•t� --- �c- _-� —r— �_ .__ 10 SETBAFC -K .1 4 - -- 5' CONC SIDEWALK I'Oj,� l rr ` p`y � qqq< TBA 54 IF�58 ' I II +'F •n ( \I I', 22.8' TD F _ 3g ! ISTAIRS',I 41 49 5U 52 53 55 1B 5] �7A1R > ��- '� 37 48 g• I 3 59 1( tA14f \ SEAWALL 11 ELEV.I. 'I 39 40 m11 44 45 9, I F. =.0 GT(FS 11I i 42 13 Zi -j 36 9 I i WARNING SIG {1,� / \ 4 L IL �( WARNING SIGN' {i <?X%}, 1 ■ 1■I jl �■ tD' -p' �� }•�1 `tip r 430 S. GULFVIEW BLVD uEARAN� �`� 035 � Y 1' 4 wwr N � z ( I I,I ar�wwv T II \\ L 9• f I STAIRS - 6 B ' (1 --�-�- < 109 111 _ ,1 �I m13 114 I I F ■ } t �a EXISTING SEAWALL L \ 110 112 i oil _ ■ - �O J �U' 20.32'I tx I 1 y j`11 \\ 11 32 i�97 99 '• 117 ' 1 L-�- Y 1 1,'41..{ T}�E�� lT7 •�1 ;rtS; 31 LOBBY �1 �`tf`(1�• �.j� Y�\ X 11 +1 30 vAF�g95 v µA01 � 118 1 69P O 1 1 •SKS }'�Y{� 1 1 {'' �Yt I 1 94 r' 1140 LF SILT FENCE 1 \ 1 I 29 2] B] /� t01 80 2 5 60 3 \ 111 O lo3 O 68 ' 11 O n `, 91 6 81 J )✓'C _78� 1B \ 1L1\1 1 � � ( I I 1 3 9104 a� �" g� zs P 62 }c OFF r 6]�UY 71Q - i C(} 45 190 m 7�7 '�W/T��)I 18 7 O 21 11]6 II fnF•' �a B3 "-N 1 STAIR5, }y�l I\ 1 21 B9 24 _VCCJl J _ 7' tm LL 1 • 1'I �8 �- O 61 (( c51 \ 11 22 8] 65 Aw 3 - cccL 1 \ 1 421 S. GULFVIEW BLVD MOTEL RED ROOF INN ji- CANTERBURY PROPERTY MANAGEMENT, INC. 1 1 �1111111f��f11 I.� t-..l N 0 10 20 40 I I 5' 2 H/C RAMP1}}}P l 1 QF PER DETAIL ON } 1- SHEET II 1 ; r H/C RAMP �! 1 I TYPE CR20 ='ll �I i I 1,1 Ij I 431 S. GULFVIEW BLVD RETAIL W /APTS ABOVE C 1 i SOFRONAS, CHRISTINE, 1 y SOFRONAS, JAMES -: � ; I • ..,,� ..�nnn�;�Ilq III I ., � - - LEGEND n 1 ' III CCCL COASTAL CONSTRUCTION CONTROL UNE " o ! 11t1 1 1 PEDESTRIAN /VEHICULAR SAFETY AIDS: 1 SPECInC 61GNAGE ALERTING E%RINC TRAFFIC OF PEDESTRIAN 1 II CROSSING(5). N H/C RAMP 1 Vt„, d I . TYPE CR10 C PI I- U1' 1 2 MIRROR INSTALLATIONS TO AID IN BOTH, PEDESTRIANS/VEHICLES. VISIBILITY. h, 11111 1 1,' NOTES: 1. VERTICAL CLEAR HEIGHT OF PARKING GARAGE IS 8'2" OR 98" TO 11 �, ACCOMMODATE HANDICAP VAN WITH TOPPER. 111 111' µ `1!l 'µj1 vCS 1. AT TYPICAL 90 TURNS, THE TURNING VEHICLE WILL ENCROACH UNTO 4 THE PATH OF ONCOMING VEHICLES. AIDS WILL BE INSTALLED TO ASSIST MOTORIST WHEN WALLS / COMUMNS IMPEDE THEIR NEW ) J 3. NO COLUMNS WILL ENCROACH INTO REQUIRED PARKING OR THE I)!I 11 r!)''LL ".( ADJACENT WALKWAYS. I •1 it 'F " L -J 2 1 III', 7 J\ 1. COLUMNS NEED TO REMAIN ON THE SIDE OF THE DRIVE ISLE DUE TO STRUCTURAL SPAN /DESIGN CONSTRAINTS. q 5 ANY NEW DRIVEWAY APRON(S) CONSTRUCTED WTHIN THE RIGH -OF -WAY \I \ S SHALL BE A MINIMUM 6" THICK FIBROUS CONCRETE AND MINIMUM 3000 H/C ACCESS PATH '133 +y I \ PSI WITH 6"lt8 " /10 %10 WWM PER CITY OF CLFARWATE CONTRACT 1!1111,�1 1 SPECIFICATIONS AND STANDARS, ARTICLE 30. 1 6 6. THE SIDEWALK WITHIN THE SOUTH GULFVIEW BOULEVARD RETAIL W /APTS ABOVE 1 1 ,1 vI 1 FRANGELIS, MICHAEL 1x;111 \ FRANGELIS, JOAN, TRUSTEE CONSTRUCTION NOTE: A SEPARATE RIGHT -OF -WAY PERMIT WILL BE REQUIRED FOR �\1 1 ALL WORK WITHIN THE RIGHT -OF -WAY OF ANY OF THE {{ '\ 20'.20' SIGHT TRIANGLE \ \\ \ ADJACENT STREET(S) THAT ARE ASSIGNED TO THE CITY. O SEE DON MELONE (727) 562 -4798 IN ROOM ,#220 AT THE MSB (MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING). 1 1, ( 1 1 I. r . 24 w 9 1!1 TRAry5F0(tMER 11.1 £ h \ 1 • { - I 4#00' ! 1 1 3O 20 9, _ \� 445 BLVD CONDOMINIUMS 1 • s m - —L- TURNOUT \ :'?- PELICAN POINTE ON CLEARWATER BEACH ] DRIVE ,. '"L EDOT INDEX 515 \`-'` \ ' 1 i) CONDO ASSOCIATION, INC. 11 i F 4F 1 9 - f-•.' G 1 R �*t .,. \ \ 1 ' H/C RAMP ORIGINAL 1 1B 9 11 10 w) (� ._) \t �' TYPE CR2o .'`.\ O RECEIVED 13 iz( e - 1\ r\ .��` �Ir L `\ v \\ \ 16 ,5 TA ' -- -)\ }' ... _ 10' SETBACK Y* ] T -•-dlµ - h \ ` l y \\ 1 3 1. 7 DEC 2007 1 11� 1 s - ; m _ .) 20 SETBACK �'J IL' `. X \\ 1 1� S" ;V OM S FR AWA r., i 1.4, C EWADL 1 l SID 1 1 a CgLC PROPOSED WALL RESPONSIBLE a f 0 \ PLANNING DEPARTMENT 1'' 1 L TO CCC jt __.F,_.' �(,. (SEE LANDSCAPE ROLLING OUT TRASH n'J� \', \ 833 ,3�'1 .0 318.34 CFA 1T. - I'1 ARCHITECT FOR \ CONTAINERS ON TRASH CITY OF CVWCWATER 40214 DETAILS) DAY TOTAL PARKING SPACES = 118 STANDARD 6 , 2 2 N68'S235 "E(C•F) HNDICAP = 9 i3 440 S. GULFVIEW BLVD vTAXI = 3 \� PROPOSED FENCE NOTE: '1 \ -� -CCCL (SEE LANDSCAPE CONDOMINIUMS T VERTICAL CLEAR HEIGHT OF PARKING GARAGE MUST BE 8' -2 IN \ ARCHITECT FOR \ FOUR FORTY WEST ASSOCIATION, INC. DETAILS) CONFORMANCE WITH ADA GUIDEUNES PARKING LEVEL 1 \ 2. CONSTRUCT STRAIGHT CURB AT DRIVEWAYS TO PROTECT LANDSCAPING AND TRANSITION TO DROP CURB AT SIDEWALK, NOTE: SEE ARCHITECTS PLAN FOR FURTHER DETAIL \ PRBPARBD FOP. SHOOT DESCRIPTION. , -- 699 -271 bK oc Taylor woodraw - u.s. Tower Division CLEARWATER BEACH VACATION _- FLORIDA DESIGN CONSULTANTS, INC. 8430 ENTERPRISE CIRCLE OWNERSHIP PROJECT - - - -- —I... 3 wJMS,SDD .,,e.,... .e c.... ENGINEERS, ENVIRONMENTALISTS, SURVEYORS 8 PLANNERS SUITE 100 -' -' •'• 3030 St "AIY 8Ne• A— Pea Rkh.y FL 34655 BRADENTON, FLORIDA 34202 SITE PLAN Tel. (727) 849 -75 BB - Fo (72 Y 846 -3648 .Ts TEL (941)554 -2000 FAX (94Q 554 -3005 E.B. No. 7421 . 10/31107 13 ( 1 1 I. r . 24 w 9 1!1 TRAry5F0(tMER 11.1 £ h \ 1 • { - I 4#00' ! 1 1 3O 20 9, _ \� 445 BLVD CONDOMINIUMS 1 • s m - —L- TURNOUT \ :'?- PELICAN POINTE ON CLEARWATER BEACH ] DRIVE ,. '"L EDOT INDEX 515 \`-'` \ ' 1 i) CONDO ASSOCIATION, INC. 11 i F 4F 1 9 - f-•.' G 1 R �*t .,. \ \ 1 ' H/C RAMP ORIGINAL 1 1B 9 11 10 w) (� ._) \t �' TYPE CR2o .'`.\ O RECEIVED 13 iz( e - 1\ r\ .��` �Ir L `\ v \\ \ 16 ,5 TA ' -- -)\ }' ... _ 10' SETBACK Y* ] T -•-dlµ - h \ ` l y \\ 1 3 1. 7 DEC 2007 1 11� 1 s - ; m _ .) 20 SETBACK �'J IL' `. X \\ 1 1� S" ;V OM S FR AWA r., i 1.4, C EWADL 1 l SID 1 1 a CgLC PROPOSED WALL RESPONSIBLE a f 0 \ PLANNING DEPARTMENT 1'' 1 L TO CCC jt __.F,_.' �(,. (SEE LANDSCAPE ROLLING OUT TRASH n'J� \', \ 833 ,3�'1 .0 318.34 CFA 1T. - I'1 ARCHITECT FOR \ CONTAINERS ON TRASH CITY OF CVWCWATER 40214 DETAILS) DAY TOTAL PARKING SPACES = 118 STANDARD 6 , 2 2 N68'S235 "E(C•F) HNDICAP = 9 i3 440 S. GULFVIEW BLVD vTAXI = 3 \� PROPOSED FENCE NOTE: '1 \ -� -CCCL (SEE LANDSCAPE CONDOMINIUMS T VERTICAL CLEAR HEIGHT OF PARKING GARAGE MUST BE 8' -2 IN \ ARCHITECT FOR \ FOUR FORTY WEST ASSOCIATION, INC. DETAILS) CONFORMANCE WITH ADA GUIDEUNES PARKING LEVEL 1 \ 2. CONSTRUCT STRAIGHT CURB AT DRIVEWAYS TO PROTECT LANDSCAPING AND TRANSITION TO DROP CURB AT SIDEWALK, NOTE: SEE ARCHITECTS PLAN FOR FURTHER DETAIL \ PRBPARBD FOP. SHOOT DESCRIPTION. , -- 699 -271 bK oc Taylor woodraw - u.s. Tower Division CLEARWATER BEACH VACATION _- FLORIDA DESIGN CONSULTANTS, INC. 8430 ENTERPRISE CIRCLE OWNERSHIP PROJECT - - - -- —I... 3 wJMS,SDD .,,e.,... .e c.... ENGINEERS, ENVIRONMENTALISTS, SURVEYORS 8 PLANNERS SUITE 100 -' -' •'• 3030 St "AIY 8Ne• A— Pea Rkh.y FL 34655 BRADENTON, FLORIDA 34202 SITE PLAN Tel. (727) 849 -75 BB - Fo (72 Y 846 -3648 .Ts TEL (941)554 -2000 FAX (94Q 554 -3005 E.B. No. 7421 . 10/31107 13 ".11n, M-57-1 p�" INNV M, 0 10 20 40 4- G, ----------------- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - x 56 �57 58 59 ROOM FLEV 5 '�! GRACE :3 '5 47 IS 5 42 to 111( 1 2 9 M 38 ONE WAY 24 1 AR SAFETY AIDS: 25.5 F, 1. SPECIFIC SIGNAGE ALERTING EXITING TRAFFIC OF PEDESTRIAN F I GO"'g.,MD CROSSING(S). NS/VEHICUES. 36 '32 0 2. MIRROR INSTAULATIOINS To AID IN BOTH, PCDESTRIA ➢ 110 VISIBILITY. 90 139 , 12o 60 a, NOTES 1. VERTICAL CLEAR HEIGHT OF PARKING GARAGE IS 8-2- OR 98' TO " 35 E, 89 740 l21 ACCOMMODATE HANDICAP VAN WITH TOPPER. Nm pAaKI 4 2� AT TYPICAL 90' TURNS. THE TURNING VEHICLE WILL ENCROACH UNTO 9, THE PATH OF ONCOMING VEHICLES. AIDS WILL BE INSTALLED TO ASSIST 34 122 62 MOTORIST WHEN WALLS / COLUMNS IMPEDE THEIR VIEW. 67 123 3. NO COLUMNS WILL ENCROACH INTO REOUIRED PARKING OR THE vn 33 102 a: ADJACENT WALKWAYS, AB OPEN TD t .l. 4. COLUMNS NEED TO REMAIN ON THE SIDE OF THE DRIVE ISLE DUE TO 9J 101 36 X 124 4* vMKIHm 32 .8 STRUCTURAL SPAN/DESIGN CONSTRAINTS. 91 00 1" 3: l 104 125 95 65 84 63! �705 AaKEHO 96 2,1: 114 126 66 TYP 29 P 1867 97 28 B2 2G 128 112 27 1105 I 08 :IX t A I c- ,I. 1- 7 A 7 13, 7, 0 26 80 'J 129 IS' I r, '2 14 73 25 79 21 77 0 78 BELOW t k 2s 2 23 TYP a 7 ORIGINAL 22 WAY t° 10 9 RECENED IT 12 9: 15 14 17 16 % DEC 3 2007 Is 19 2o 76 T PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER ; TOTAL PARKING SPACES 14 STANDARD VALET = 24 Vj----�CCCL PARKING LEVEL 2 NOTE: SEE ARCHITECTS PLAN FOR FURTHER DETAIL PREPARED 'DR. SHEET DESCRIPTION. 611 wxoc Toylor Woodrow CLEARWATER BEACH VACATION U.S. Tower Division 209 FLORIDA DESIGN CONSULTANTS, INC. 8430 ENTERPRISE CIRCLE OWNERSHIP PROJECT 4 JMS,5DD ...... �'� ENGINEERS, ENVIRONMENTALISTS, SURVEYORS a PLANNERS SUITE 100 3030 SI.—y Blvd, New P.' I Rih.y F 34655 BRADENTON, FLORIDA 34202 SITE PLAN T.1, (721) —8 2 F. (7 27) 648-3648 TEL (941)554-2000 FAX (941) 554-3005 11111.7 E.B. No. 7421 13 1 0 10 20 40 ryfi4 5 z \ ti 1 / ; I i �`�✓ I�I - __:. / � / "ir III I!� V, � I 1 '1 ---------- - - - - -- _ \ -- -- — 4 4 2 � 36 31 J2 3J 3J .. 38 79 0 - ' - 2 26 1J 28 29 3p _ 1 ' A ... +1,5. F \ 24 15 19 mp 12 23 01 o -n m 711111' I STORAGEI - .� � 111 9' �5v I TYP - \� � � I I A� l it 4- 9 - JT W ,6 .. ONE WAY ONE wwv TYP .I Y't € - ti \. 9. trV Ii 0 Tom' -: te' SERVICE; O m� 44 93 PPnF TRIAN /V HI R SAFETY AIDS: `\ �I 142 41 OB I 4 i it 1 SPECIFIC SICNAGE ALERTING EXITING TRAFFIC OF PEDESTRIAN IS ? 149 148r 6 145 144 143 m 10 I ROOM j CROSSING(S). 46 a mF 14J 14 ! 2. MIRRORINSTALLATIOINS TO AID IN BOTH, PEDESTRNNS/VEHICLES, 1 4$ A � l' -I s 1 D ■ II VISIBILITY. 25.58 l\\ r ■^ ■ 90 SO" // 111 O 9O 132 ` y KQT� 1 { 89 vA 1 1, AT TYPICAL 90 TURNS. THE TURNING VEHICLE WILL ENCROACH UNTO \ THE PATH OF ONCOMING VEHICLES. AIDS WILL BE INSTALLED TO ASSIST 4 4 \ 15 5 t88 No / ■ T 131 TVP J \\ y 1 ti p MOTORIST WHEN WALLS / COMUMNS IMPED 12 E THEIR VIEW. 91 v II j o O IJJ 1 ttll / ,5 ry i 2 L NO COLUMNS WILL ENCROACH INTO REOUIRED PARKING OR THE 2 O A o P 1 i4 C ADJACENT WALKWAYS 0 \ 13 6J ( 92 / 4: 113 3. COLUMNS NEED TO REMAIN ON THE SIDE OF THE DRIVE ISLE DUE TO ,!, 1\ PM'"NC T 93 Il, /' 1.8v 114 VvNKEtoO TW 134 129 STRUCTURAL SPAN /DESIGN CONSTRAINTS. \ 86 \Pn ENO 1j 'm�PARw�O pK\8 135 50 vo v115 H 128 t 1 85 vA�N 94 Av 109 6 BLDG i - c P 3 ' 1 Km 116 � W \B 136 51� SUPPORT 95 108 O 27 !ri \ TgP 10 2'183' 84 6 N iN, 3 83 96 1� T� 126 138 9 10J 137 52 2A 1B 53 9J Zq 16 125 11 8 O 18P 2 1� 11g TVP 139 I 1p5 119 �� 98 124 S t y1t t J 1� '.. \ 120 99 109 $T FIRS 1 1 `1■ 6 8p 121 III A 54 5 L 79 6 101 102 t 55 Yl \11\3Yy •^ 1 \ \\ 76 NERA Oft ,. ONE 6 t TANK 1 \ \I 9 61 60 39 } �► P 62 ORIGINAL 2 r ONE WAV 64 63 66 RECEIVED 1 66 8 JO 69 1 - \ .; StA1R JI ; JJ J2 1 DEC _ 3 2007 ,4 ' l PLANNING �DEPARTMENT 'a :: 1\ ��1 rte.._ y "� #' .. �`, _ '1.• y\ CITY EARWATER a ; ` ., r -;" ;�� _ TOTAL PARKING SPACES = 149 ��\ - - STA NDARD 7 0 HANDICAP = 0 VALET = 12 1 —CCCL TYP PARKING LEVEL 3 NOTE: SEE ARCHITECTS PLAN FOR FURTHER DETAIL 1 PREPARED FOR, SHEET DESCRIPTION, N�0, Taylor Woodrow - U,S. Tower Division CLEARWATER BEACH VACATION _ 620971 FLORIDA DESIGN CONSULTANTS, INC. 8430 ENTERPRISE CIRCLE OWNERSHIP PROJECT a _ 5 .JMS,SDD ENGINEERS, ENVIRONMENTALISTS, SURVEYORS 8 PLANNERS SUITE 100 c.en 3030 S-k y Blyd, New Po.l Richey FL 3a655 GRADEN70N, FLORIDA 34202 SITE PLAN Tel, (727) 849 -1588 - F. (J2]) 848 -3648 TEL (941)554 -2000 FAX (941) 554 -3005 - - 10/31/07 13 E.B. No. 7421 o.n GEOTEXTILE UNDERLINER TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION ACCESS N.T.S. JVlnyl Sheathed EAW Steel Celle f9800 Ubs. Breaking Strenl, I With GalWPI,', d Connectors ITool Free Disconnect) Slolled PVC Connect,, Pipe (M.1.1 Collor Reinforced) Closed Celt Solid Plastic Foam FIDIBIT. Ni DID. EDEN.) (D Ile. COMPANY NAME. ADDRESS AND PHONE NUMBER Per Ft. Buoyancy. 18 0z. Nylon Reinforced `l8 Oz. Nylon Reinforced PVC Fabric (3N PSI Test) Stress Plate PVC Felrfc (300 psi }GEI_I1M CAOfn Tetll With LEE. .—.,I TYPE a TYPE I D, -5' SN. (SNp /e Panel For NOW 5' or Lessl. Dz-5' Std. (Addltio,KNI Panel For Depths, 50. Curt,M To Reach Bottom Up To OepMS Of ICI Feet. TWD'2) Panels To Be Used For Depths Greater Than ID Feel Unless Special Depth Curtains Specfrleelly Celled For In The Plans 0, Al Determined By The Enginee, NOTICE: COMPONENTS OF TYPES I AND E MAY BE SIMILAR OR IDENTICAL TO PROPRIETARY DESIGNS. ANY INFRINGEMENT ON THE PROPRIETARY RIGHTS OF THE DESIGNER SHALL BE THE SOLE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE USER. SUBSTITUTIONS FOR TYPES I AND 11 SHALL BE AS APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER. FLOATING TURBIDITY BARRIERS D.O.T. INDEX #103 N.T.S. MAINTENANCE ON SILT SCREENS: SILT SCREENS SHALL BE INSPECTED AFTER EACH RAINFALL EVENT FIR SIGNS OF DETEHIGRATON OR FAILURE DETERIORATION OF A SILT SCREEN SHALL BE CONSTRUED TO MEAN MAT ME 9LT SCREEN HAS LIMITED EFFECTIVENESS OR CAPACITY FOR THE FUNCTION OF TRAPPING SEDIMENT, DUE TO PROBLEMS SUCH AS, BUT NOT LIMITED T0. EXCESSIVE BUILDUP Of SEDIMENT OR CONSTRUCTION ACCIDENT. WHEN A SILT SCREEN BECOMES DETERIORATED. IT SHALL BE fi,WEDIATFIY REMEDIED AT ME DIRECTION OF ME ENGINEER BY SUCH MEANS AS REMOVAL OF ME EXCESSIVE BUILDUP OF SLT. STRAIGHTENING AND TIGHTENING OF ME SCREEN, OR ANY OTHER SUCH MEASURE DEEMED NECESSARY. FAILURE OF A SILT SCREEN SHALL BE CONSTRUED TO MEAN THAT ME SILT SCREEN IS NO LONGER CAPABLE OF FUNCTIONING TO MAP SEDIMENT DUE TO A RIP. TEAR. OVERTOPPING BY SEDIMENT, BIODEGRADATION. CONSTRUCTION ACCIDENT, OR ANY OTHER SUCH MEANS WHEN A SILT SCREEN IS DEEMED BY ME ENGINEER TO HAVE FAILED, IT SHALL BE IMMEDIATELY REPLACED WITH NEW SILT SCREEN WHIN ME LIMITS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER. PREVENTATIVE MAINTENANCE OF ME SUT SCREEN SHALL BE ACLOMPLISHD BY WEEKLY INSPECTION FOR 9GNS OF DETERIDRATION OR FAILURE DURING PERIODS OF NO RAINFALL EVENT. MAINTENANCE OF HAY BALES: HAY BALES SHALL BE INSPECTED AFTER EACH RAINFALL EVENT FOR SIGNS OF DETERIORATION OR FAILURE DETERIORATION OF A HAY BALE SCREEN SHALL BE CONSTRUED TO MEAN THAT ME HAY BALE SCREEN HAS LIMITED EFFECTIVENESS OR CAPACITY FOR ME FUNCTION OF MAPPING SEDIMENT. DUE TO PROBLEMS SUCH AS. BUT NOT UMITD TO, EXCESSIVE BUILDUP OF SEDIMENT OR CONSTR UCT)N ACCIDENT. WHEN A HAY BALE SCREEN BECOMES DETERIORATED. IT SHALL BE IMMEDIATELY REMEDIED AT ME DIRECTION OF ME ENGINEER BY SUCH MEANS AS REMOVAL OF THE EXCESSIVE BUILDUP OF SILT. STRAIGHTENING AND REALIGNING OF ME SCREEN. OR ANY OTHER SUCH MEASURE DEEMED NECESSARY. FAILURE OF A HAY BALE SCREEN SHALL BE CONSTRUED TO MEAN THAT THE HAY BALE SCREEN IS NO LONGER CAPABLE OF FUNCTIONING TO TRAP SEDIMENT DUE TO OVERTOPPING BY SEDIMENT. BIODEGRADATION. CONSTRUCTION ACCIDENT, OR ANY OTHER SUCH MEANS. WHEN A HAY BALE SCREEN IS DEEMED BY ME ENGINEER TO HAVE FAILED, IT SHALL BY IMMEDIATELY REPLACED WM A NEW HAY BALE SCREEN WHIN ME UMI S DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER, PREVENTATIVE MAINTENANCE OF ME HAY BALE SCREEN SHALL BE ACCOMPLISHED BY WEEKLY INSPECTION FOR SGNS OF DETERIORATION OR FAILURE DURING PERIODS OF NO RAINFALL EVENT. OPTIONAL POST POSITIONS POST (OP TONS: 2'K 4' OR 2 1/2 MIN. DIP. W000: STEEL 1.33 LBS/FT MIN.) I I FILTER FABRIC (IN CONFORMANCE WITH SEC. 985 FOOT SPEC.) I ff A ELEVATION TYPE 111 SILT FENCE D.O.T. INDEX #102 N.T.S. B SILT CURB INLET R SLU MA%. FENCE EX O PC E�SAV IYVC tl CUBING LH N. �I r I PAVEMENT 5T RM DRAIN DOEMINABR. IN :t SMUCTURE 6' UN A TON_ CURB INLET INSTALUTION: INSTALL CURB INLET SEDIMENT BARRIER IMMEDIATELY AFTER PAVNG. USE B' CONCRETE BLOCK OR EQUAL MAPPED IN FILTER FABRIC. PROVIDE A A' GAP BETWEEN INLET BARRIER AND ET TO ALLOW OWRRDW. MAINTENANCE: THE BARRIER SHALL BE INSPECTED DAILY AND AFTER EACH RAIN AND REPAIRS MADE AS NEEDED. SEDIMENT SHALL BE REMOVED WHEN TIE SEDIMENT HAS ACCUMULATED TO ONE -HALP ME HEIGHT OF TIE BARRIER. SEDIMENT SHALL NOT BE WASHED INTO THE INLET. IT SHALL BE REMOVED FROM THE SEDIMENT BARRIER AND DISPOSED OF AND STABILIZED SO THAT IT WILL NOT ENTER THE INLET, AGAIN. CURB INLET SEDIMENT BARRIER Closed Cell Solid Plastic Foam FIOIONPn (S' Dlu. EOUfY.) (12 Lls. Per Fl. BWyDI [Polypro Rope 1500 IR, B­ Pm Strength) } Geft ized CAD /n- j_2d _ RINCIPAL POST POSITION FI �— (CANTED 20 TOWARD ROW) FILTER FABRIC SILT FLOW SECTION � 4 X_ N' CROSSBMCE TORM DRAIN TRUCNRE 6' T INSTALLATION: TYPE BI SILT FENCE SUPPORTED DT STEEL POST SHALL BE USED. THE STAKES SHALL . BE SPACED EVENLY AROUND THE GROUND. TER OF THE INLET A MAXIMUM P. 3 FEET APART. AND SECURELY DRIVEN INTO THE CRWND. APPROXIMATELY 18 INCHES DEEP. THE FABRIC SHAH BE ENTRENCHED 12 INCHES AND BACKFILLED WITH CRUSHED STONE OR COMPACTED SOIL. FABRIC AND WIRE SHALL BE INCHES FASTENED TO ME POST, AND FABRIC ENDS MUST BE OVERLAPPED A MINIMUM AR IB INCHES OR WRAPPED TOGETHER AROUND A POLL TO PROVOS A LONTNUWS FABRIC BARRIER AROUND THE INLET. MAINTENANCE: THE BARRIER SHALL BE INSPECTED DAILY AND AFTER EACH RAIN AND REPAIRS MADE AS NEEDED. SEDIMENT SHALL BE REMOVED WHEN THE SEDIMENT HAS ACCUMULATED TO ONE -HALF THE HEIGHT OF TIE BARRIER. SEDIMENT SMALL NOT BE WASHED INTO THE INLET, IT SHALL BE REMOVED FROM ME SEDIMENT BARRIER AND DISPOSED OF AND STABILIZED SO THAT IT WILL NOT ENTER TIE INLET, AGAIN, INLET SEDIMENT BARRIER FILTER FABRIC WITH SUPPORTING FRAME NAME TIME COMPANY NAME. ADDRESS AND PHONE NUMBER DATE I CERTIFY UNDER PENALTY Of LAW THAT I UNDERSTAND, AND SHALL COMPLY WITH, ME TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA GENERIC PERMIT FOR S7ORMWATER DISCHARGE FROM LARGE AND SMALL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES AND THIS STORMWATER POLLUTER PREVENTION PUN .L PREPARED THEREUNDER. -1• NPDES CONTRACTOR AND SUBCONTRACTOR CERTIFICATION TO BE COMPLETED AFTER CONTRACTORS HAVE BEEN SELECTED, SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT CERTIFICATION CONSTRUCTION SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN (CSWMP) HILLCREET PRESERVE THE CSWIMP CONSISTS OF PUN SHEETS B AND T SHDWNG EROSION PROTECTION DEVICES TO BE UTILIZED ON THE PROI 2. ME APPLICANT /OWNER OR AUTHORIZED AGENT HAS REVIEWED THE CSWMP AND HAS SIGNED THI CSWMP WHERE REWIRED BELOW. 3. ME CSWMP SHALL BE PART OF THE FINAL CONSTRUCTION PLANS FOR THE PERMITTED SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM. SIGNATURE: NAMF _ DATE: — - -- APPLICANT OWNER AUTHORIZED AGENT ❑ ❑ ❑ I CERTIFY UNDER PENALTY OF LAW THAT MIS DOCUMENT AND ALL ATTACHMENTS WERE PREPARED UNDER MY DIRECTION OR SUPERVSION IN ACCORDANCE WIN A SYSTEM DESIGNED TO ASSURE THAT OU ALIFIED PERSONNEL PROPERLY GATHERED AND EVALUATED THE INFDRMATION SUBMITTED. BASED ON MY INQUIRY OF THE PERSON DR PERSONS WHO MANAGE THE SYSTEM, OR THOSE PERSONS DIRECTLY RESPONSIBLE FOR GATHERING THE INFORMATION, THE INFORMATION SUBMITTED IS. TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF. TRUE. ACCURATE, AND COMPLETE I AM AWARE THAT THERE ARE SIGNIFICANT PENALTIES FOR SUBMITTING FALSE INFORMATION. INCLUDING ME POSSIBILITY OF FINE AND IMPRISONMENT FOR KNOWING VOUTONS. NAME (OPERATOR AND /OR RESPONSIBLE AUTHORITY) DATE 1. SHE C A. PRO.ECIDESCRPTON: ME DEVELOPER / AP PROPOSES TO C?, RSUCI A NEW HDEL (TMESHARE) CD x LOCATED IN CLEARWATER, TLORIDA. CONSTRUCTION WILL CONSIST OF CLEARING. IN 111, EARIHWDRK�IIISMAWTW OF TIE MFNASTRUCMRE. BACK FILUNG, AVUG ANDEGPADING. B. MAJOR SOL DISTURBNG ACTVTES: FDA NSTNLATON BACK WNC AND GRADING CT WILL NCEUDE CLEARING. GRUBBING. EAPMWORK. INSTALLITEN OF PAVNG, DRAINAGE AND SANTARY SIROCTIRES. WATER MAIN THE CONTRACTOR PILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PRDNDNG TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT STABRIZATCH AS SOON AS POSSIBLE FOR AREAS OF THE SHE WERE CONSTRUCTER ACTVTES HAYS CEASED. BUT IN NO CASE SN.ML TIE TIME BE GREATER MAN FOURTEEN (IA) CALDIDAR DAYS C. TOTAL PROJECT AREA: 1.57 ACRES THE PROJECT CONSISTS OF ME CONSTRUCTION OF A HDML (TIMESHARE) COMPLEX REARING AND GRUBBING. EARTH— DRAINAGE/UKITY I—ASTRUCNRE AND PAVEMENT, D. TOTAL AREA TO BE DISTURBED. 1.87 ACRES IT SHALL BE THE INTENT OF ME CONTRACTOR 1 11152E THE ACREAGES OF GSNRBED SGL N ME PRO.IEGT AREA AT ALL TOLES E (1) RUNOFF COEFFICIENTS BEFORE CW(B). DURING CW(D) AND AFTER LW(A) CONSTRUCTGI: KlOF OPEN T COF DENT02CR DMPER eOUSIIRPALES: C - 0.95 5 ED AREAS ENPWEO SOL ETC, DUPING CWST, C - III _.MD RUNOFF LOEMOCNT: W By O.BS CW(D)I o.AO GMAL D.BS THE SM CONSISTS OF NATURAL TREED AREAS PUNTED PINE AREAS AND MANTAINED PASTURE AREAS NARRATVERS 1111 O SOL DSM RBINO ACTVTES AND NPLEMENIAIII OF CONTROLS CONSTRUCTION ACTVTES - GENERAL CWSTRVCTON ACTVTES ON THIS PROJECT CON95T OF CLEARING, GRUBBING, EARTHWORK, INSTALLATON OF ME INFRASTRUCTURE BACK FILLING AND GRADING. ALL ITEMS BEPRESENIED IN ME FDIDWNG DISCUSSION ARE TREATED IN DETAIL IN ME CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS AND PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS 'RORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ANSPORTATON STANDARD S9EGMATIONS FDA ROAD AND BRIDGE CONSTRUCTION', OR WILL BE NIPLEMENTED BY ME CONTRACTOR'S REPRESENTATIVE N A MANNER APPROPRIATE TO ENYRONMENTALLY SENSTVE CONSTRUCTION PRACTICES AND AS APPROVED BY THE OWNER. ME CONTRACTOR WILL BE REWIRED TD PREPARE A SHE SPEGFIL EROSION CONTROL PUN. ME CONRRACTOR WLL ALSO BE MOUeRED TO MODIFY THE PLAN OR MATERIALS DURING CONSTRUCTKN TO ADAPT TO SFA 1 YARMTONS AWAY OFF_ PRACTICES. ROUTE C MORES CWENTD THROUCH ME LIMITING EFFECTVENESS�OF EROSION ANDDSSEDIICII CONTROLS RTED. CAN ADD VOLUME AND SIZE 1p SIRUCTMAt REW R D By ME NODES PERMIT BUT NOT POULLICH LLNY INOLATED SNA REQUIREMENT E ORMWAMR PDLLUTON PREVEONTON PLAN CLAN BE FOUNDH NU ME�CWTFACT DOCUMENTS ME CONTRACTOR HILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PROVIDING A STABB.— CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE FOR VEHICLES ENTERING OR EXITING ONTO PUSUC ROADS ME CONTRACTOR'S REFRE MINTATVE SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FDA MONTORING ME SYlMW AND MOOFYNG ME SYSTEM OR PROCEDURES AS NEEDED. LONSTRUCTON ACT-ES TO COMMENCEMENT. M OYOE A DETAILED CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE RI INDICATE DATES O MAJOR CRADNG ACTVTES AND DETERMINE SEWENGUG OF MMPOURY AND PERMANENT SDLLOSMRENG ACTVTES ON ALL PORTgNS OF ME SM. PR ON TO ME BEGINNNG OF ANY PHASE. ME CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL EROSON AND SEDIMENT CONTROL ITEMS AS DESCRIBED IN THE CONSH UCMIN DRAWINGS. THE TOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR PROVIDING G. MULCHING AND WATER AS SOON AS POSSIBLE FOR AREAS OF THE SM WHERE CONSTRUCTION HAS TEMPOPARILY CEASED WT CM Np LASE SHALL ME THE BEDGREATER THAN FOURTEEN (11) DAYS. INST —TON O ME NFRASTRU; TUM IND EARMWONN, AS SHOWN DN ME PUNS MAY REEARE DEWAMING PRIOR TO CDSTRUCTON. TIE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE DDIM SBMILLAR YTDRSINCNGAAREAS HOWEVER• AT RING NO TIME FLOW SHALL INS CONTRACTOR EIEGHAME DEWAIERNC AREAS ROWCREATED OREGT.Y TO STAKED WETANDHAY AREASS N DRY GRASSED WALES OR AND SEDIMENT CONTRRS 9HALL BE MANTAIND 1HNWWWi CONSTRU[M1N AND MAY BE REMOVED ONLY WHEN PERMANENT STABIL.ZATON IS ESTABUSNED AND ME OWNER APPPOVES ME REMOVAL A EROSION AND SEGMENT CONTROLS: (I) STABIIZATON PRACTICES TO BE IWKEMENTED. STABGLIZAIMN MEASURES SHALL BE INITIATED AS SOON AS PRACTICABLE IN PORTONS O ME SHE WERE CONSTRUCTON ACTVTES HAVE TEMPORARILY OR PERMANENTLY CEASED. BUT IN NO CASE SHALL ME TIME BE GREATER MAN FOURTEEN (IA) DAYS AFTER THE CONSTRUCTON ACTVTY HAS TEMPORARILY OR PERMANENTLY CEASED. ALL DISTURBED AREAS WLL BE SEEDED AND MULLED OR SODDED FOLLOWNG OCASTRUCTW. (2) STRUCTURAL PRAC (I) WASTE DISPOSAL ME CONTRACTOR WILL PROVWE UTTER CONTROL AND COLLECTEN WMN ME PROJECT BOUNDARIES DURING CONSTRUCTION ACTVTES ALL FERTUZBR. HYDROCARBON, OR OTHER CHEMICAL CONTAINERS SHALL BE DISPOSED O BY ME CWMACTOR ACCORDING TO EPA 'S STANDARD PRACTICES AS DETAILED 91 ME MANUFACTURER. NO SOLD MATERIALS INCLUDING BUILDING AND CWSTRULTION MATERIALS SHALL BE OISCNARGED TO WEVJNDS OR BURED ON -STE. (2) OF -SIT VENGLE TRACKING: OT -SITE VEHICLE IRACKING WILL BE CONTROLLED BY THE FOLLOWING WNW& LOADED 1AU L TRUCKS TD BE COVERED WM TARPAUUN EXCESS DIRT ON READ REMOVED DAILY. STABILIZED CONSTRUCTOR ENTRANCE. ME CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CONSTRUCTNC AND MAINTAINING STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCES WIN ENTERING OR EXITING WILD PUBUC ROAD. ME CONTRACTOR'S REPRESENTATK SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR MWIFVNG ME SYSTEM OR PROCEDURES AS NEEDED AND AS APPROVED BY ME DOURER. (3) SANITARY WASTE: ALL SANITARY WASTE WILL BE COLLECTED FROM PORTABLE UNITS BY A LICENSED SANTARY WASTE MANAGEMENT CW iMCiOR AS REOIRED BY STALE REWUTON. (A) FERTNZERS AND PESTGDES FERTILIZERS AND SDL STERILIZERS WILL BE USED ON THIS PROJECT IN ACCORDANCE WM DE PROJECT SPECFICATWS AT ME DISCRETION O ME CONTRACTOR WITH 0 O 14ATW O ME OWNER. (5) NON- STORMWAIER DISCHARGE (INCLUDING SPILL REPMTNG). A. ME CONTRACTOR WLL PPONDE ME OEVFLOPER / MPUNANT MM AN EROSION CONTROL PUN THAT WILL INCLUDE SPILL REPDRRNG AND RESPONSE B. APPROVED STALE. LOCAL PUNS, OR SMRWWAMR PERMITS SEE ATTACHED PERWITS (6) STORAGE APPUCITON. GENERATICKA AND W TTIN OF MXIC SUBSTANCES (A) ALL TOMC SUBSTANCES ARE TO BE STORED. APPLIED. GENERATED. OR MITIGATED IN ACCORDANCE WIN ME GRITERM OF ME APPROPRIATE REGULATORY ALENGES 3. MAINTENANCE: MEECON--TOR U. BE RESPONSIBLE FW MAINTENANCE AND REPAIRS OF EACEIR AND SEDIMENT CONTROL DEVICES AND BEWOVAL O FROSW AND SEONENT CONTROL DEVICES AFTER ME NOTICE OF TERMINATDN. M1IMNANCE AND REP" RECURED FOR ME CONTRO AND ABATEMENT OF EROSION AND WATER PDLUTON SHALL BE NRUUED N ME COST OF PAY ITEMS FOR THIS PP_Gl. ME LipN SHALL MAINTAIN RAN GAUGES ON ME PRO.ECT SITE AND RECORD WEEKLY RAINFALL ALL CONMR MEASURES WILL BC MAINTAINED DAILY BY THE CONTRACTOR ALL MEASURES WILL BE MANTAINED IN GOOD WORKING ORDER. E A REPAH IS NECESSARY, H WLL BE NITATED WMIN 24 HWR5 O REPORT. STRUCTURAL PRACTICES AND CONTRRS ME FOLOWNG PRACRCES WILL BE USED TO MAINTAIN ER09W AND SEDIMENT CONTROLS: BUILT -HIP SEDIMENT WILL BE REMOVED FROM XT FENCE WEN IT HAS RUCHED ONE -MILD ME HDGIT OF THE FENCE. MUPORARV AND PERMANENT SEEING AND PLANING WILL BE INSPECID FOR BARE SPOTS WASEUT8. AND HEALTHY GHOWYN. STABILIZED CONSTRUCTER ENTRANCES SHALL BE MAINTAINED TO PREVENT CLOGGING OF ROCK BEDDING WHICH MAY IMPEDE ME USEFULNESS OF THE STRUCTURE. A. NSPEI`— ME CONTRACTOR'SR DAILY INSPECTORS REWIRED FOR ME CONTROL AND ABATEMENT O EROSION AND WATER POLLUTON SHALL BE INCLUDED IN ME COST OF ME PAY TEWS FOR N OACT. ALL EROSION AND WATER POLLUTON ABATEMENT AND CONRR MEASURES WLL BE INSPECTED DAILY BY ME CONTRACTOR, ME CONTRACNR SHALL USE THE CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION RFPDfT FORM (SEE ATTACRED) FOR DAILY INSPECTIONS. S TRADING AND REPORTRC. REGUeRD NSPECTONS MUST OCCUR AT LEAST ONCE PER WEEK AND WTHN 24 HOURS OF ME END OF A STORM EVENT THAT IS 0.50 INCHES OR GREATER. AN NSPECTON REPORTING FORM HAS BEEN PROVDED TO THE OWNER/DEVROPER. ME TRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT A WEEKLY REPORT TD ME DEVELOPER / APPLICANT DWUMENTNG ME DAILY INSPECTIONS AND MAINTENANCE OR REPAIRS TO ME ERDSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL DEVICES. ME DEVELOPER / APPLICANT OR ITS REPRESENTATIVES SHALL MAINTAIN ALL REWIRED RECORDS SUBMIMD BY ME CONTRACTOR AND COMPLETE ALL SWPPP INSPELIW REPORT FORMS REWIRED FOR ME NPDES PERMIT. PREPARATION OF ME CONTRACTOR'S WEEKLY REPORTS O INSEECDWS MAINHENANCE AND REPAIRS REWIRED FOR ME CONTROL AND ABATEMENT OF EROSION AND WATER POLLUTION SHALL BE INCLUDED 11 ME COST O ME PAY ITEMS FOR MIS PROJECT. ORIGINAL T-L PREPARED FOR. SHEET DESCRIPTION. roc To for Woodrow - U.S. Tower Division CLEARWATER BEACH VACATION 699 -z71 ■�7� FLORIDA DESIGN CONSULTANTS, INC. y 8430 ENTERPRISE CIRCLE OWNERSHIP PROJECT :09 6 ex 1S,SDD f— ENGINEERS, ENVIRONMENTALISTS, SURVEYORS 8 PLANNERS SUITE 100 STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION "0 3030 sI4.Ley Blvd, New Po.l Richey FL 39655 BRADENTON. FLORIDA 34202 Td. (7 7) 849 -75913 - F.K� (72]) 8913-3648 I I PLAN AND C S W M P A" TEL 941554 -2000 FAX 941 554 -3005 E.B. No. 7421 RwISIRNe 10131107 13 CITY OF CLEARWATER i E A LEGEND N 25' 10' r t<./ - - ✓ R :•\ \ ®� = Proposed Storm sewer SIDEWALK �C$Y - I I \ • = Proposed Manhole t. 6.30 �'.? x, Zf' I 10 =Proposed Storm Structure Number ! =Proposed Silt Fence FEMA Flood Zane Lne Overloud Dco'no Flow D...it. 1: FLDOR 9e Concentrated Droma9e Flow D,rection , J ' `•., ��y� < .. _ / Hard Su.Tace Drona9e Flow Dreclion + 5P P oposed Spo t ero Ell on 0 10 20 40 J - � ,A,ar .yt•' yh}� i Exis Ung Spot El—ti- ENTRANCE !. �� '�^`�n1titr.LSOJ" J G / E3 = B- PVC ENTRANCE SECTION �1 f ......_...... \..ash �? > 7 _ / YARD DRAIN (8' MIN) =Floor Dron antl Crate Elevol on /Invert Elevol on 1 - OCS , i TYPE, SIZEAND SLOPE OF Yord Dra n and Grate Elevot on /Invert Elevol on 101 - - - DRAINAC SYSTEM TO BE / l SEE SHEET 12 OF 1} FOR I r,'. DETERMINED AT CONSTRUCTION PLAN / I / CCCL = Coastol Construct on Control U- DETERMINED 101, FILTERDRAIN PLANS \ / AND DETAILS CCCL "' 27'58'11" LAT \ - -- i - - SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT CERTIFICATION - 28'49'51' LONG -/� • - „-Ti- "'{ - -' - - 'n o UI� CONSTRUCTION SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN (CSWMP) I' c- a'. c. •. _.rte -. . _ , . _ . __._ .- _ - i J� / O _ HILLCREST PRESERVE MATCH EXISTN _ AN 7 SHOWING EROSION PROTECTION DEVICES TO BE __ _ _ p T PLAN SHEETS 6 D WI Nv 5' CONCRETE _ - WITH VA UTILIZED ON THE PROJECT. :ISCE6 U �LLEC1Y 1. THE CSWMP CONSISTS OF _ • I I 2. THE APPLICANT OWNER OR AUTHORIZED AGENT HAS RENEWED THE CSWMP AND HAS SIGNED THE ' -' / CURB CSWMP WHERE REQUIRED BELOW. IISTAIRSIC A ". T4 > / -1 \ ., � - "'. ' { ., ', - .... p -Tj 3. THE CSWMP SHALL BE PART OF THE FINAL CONSTRUCTION PLANS FOR THE PERMITTED SURFACE IE =1.00 ELE WATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM. fR V. ^*.>;' -------------------------------------------- {. ^ m SIGNATURE. THROUGH -+ �5 qy EXISTNG 1 �_II t 7 S V DATE SEAWALL 1 - - 1 "8i'i P ` NAME:_____________________ _______________ _ _____________ IE 150 1 / T/ IE 1 62 ;n % 1 E WAY OIL AND I `,. MATCH EXISTNG� 'Ut L A GREASE �;� J r - N:�= APPLICANT OWNER AUTHORIZED AGENT 39 LF FILTER DRAIN (+ _ SERVICE i` =_v5 -c'- 7 �< 1 _ . /-< l+ ry S (Tj ` ❑ ❑ 51 LF 18 RCP = / v /i ■ ■■ _ �y,r < -rt- 1 - I CERTIFY UNDER PENALTY OF LAW THAT THIS DOCUMENT AND ALL ATTACHMENTS WERE PREPARED 0 0.29R \ •l I V y t tj^ ➢ LAND MY DIRECTION OR SUPERVISION IN ACCORDANCE WITH A SYSTEM DESIGNED TO ASSURE THAT OUA IFI D PERS WIONNEL PROPERLY GATHERED AND EVALUATED THE INFORMATION SUBMITTED. BASED `4 ON MY INQUIRY OF THE PERSON OR PERSONS WHO MANAGE THE SYSTEM. OR THOSE PERSONS - STORM MH 1\ • • a / % .r < 4 DIRECTLY RESPONSIBLE FOR GATHERING THE INFORMATION THE IN SUBMITTED IS, TO THE RIM =6.05 BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE AND BELI EF. TRUE ACCURATE, AND COMPLETE, I AM AWARE THAT THERE rn m IE= 1.15 (NW) `. \ 1 �i / J 7 < / /1 1' x': ARE SIGNIFICANT PENALTIES FOR SUBMITTING FALSE INFORMATON, INCLUDING THE POSSIBILITY OF FINE IE= 1.15 (5) +. \ v, m, _a /, • /'/ d < < AND IMPRISONMENT FOR KNOWING VIOLATIONS. LOBBY d' < l • NAME (OPERATOR AND /OR RESPONSIBLE AUTHORITY) DATE Al VAULT H/C ACCESS PA1H ACCE �< <''tr FIRE ACCESS NOTE' S ®M MH \ O 59 LF 1B" O; .2BR / ' ` f (' . ; f / .,r,, 'k - RCP / 'N /'�'� /�� .ON j < � � A ` 1. FIRE DEPARTMENT ACCESS SHALL MEET REQUIREMENTS PER FLORIDA RIM�6.02 < ' C !' 1 1 7 20' " 40' TEMPORARY ` ACCESS FOR FIRE LDEPARTMENT NVEHICLES. RAPER 18, TO INSURE PROPER IE =il }} (N) \ INV =1.50 "'" ±<� CONSTRUCTON ACCESS N� IE =`j. } }(E) 1 ACCESS (SEE DETAIL SHEET 6) NOTES 1. ALL DRAIN COVERS AND GRATES IN DRIVE AISLES MUST MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF HS -20 SPECIFICATIONS. Q MATCH EXISTING 2. LANDSCAPE PLANTING COORDINATE WITH YARD DRAIN LOCATIONS. 3. THE USE OF MIRRORS TO ENSURE SAFETY OF PEDESTRt4NS AND t : +� /'' "/ ^ " 1 �' j, ✓ OTHER VEHICLES DUE TO LANE ENCROACHMENT ISTAIRS 4. ANY NEW DRIVEWAY APRON(S) CONSTRUCTED WITHIN THE \ S I < '• ?S t- ry7`, RICH -OF -WAY SHALL BE 6 MINIMUM 6' THICK FIBROUS CONCRETE AND MINIMUM 3000 PSI WITH 6'ND ST %10 RS, PER CITY OF CLEARWATE CONTRACT SPECIFICATIONS AND STANDARS, ARTICLE 30. S. BRICK PAVER DRIVEWAYS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED IN COMPLANCE /\ \1 E%SRNG BCURB AND WITH CLEARWATER'S CONTRACT SPECIFICATIONS AND STANDARDS INDEX T- r! r .T Op NAY -' ,'t" �TLARE WITH VALLEY",., 1 @116. SEE DETAIL ON SHEEP 12 1 l ✓` 6. STORM SEWER MANHOLE COVER(S) SHALL NOT HAVE THE WORDS 1 '�f" I<.�< •l r/ >yr. 'CLEARWATER' OR 'ClT, OF CLEARWATER' ON THEM AS THE SYSTEM IS A Y PRIVATE SYSTEM. \ 1\ r • FFE = 6.06 _� •_', s TTRANSFORME 7. ALL ROOF RUNOFF TO BE ROUTED TO VAULT. < \ _ \ TRASH { ^_ 1 y" HDLDING ` TR STAGIN 2 ~[b 'S �%c' FLOOR DRAIN NOTES' REA /LOADIN A kE OOR DRAINS SHOWN HEREIN ARE FOR ILLUSTRATIVE PURPOSES ONLY . \ 1'' • ZONE FOR ACTUAL FLOOR DRAIN LOCATIONS AND DETAILS, PLEASE REFER TO / WAY PLUMBING SHEETS IN THE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS. ONE MATCH EXISTING YARD DRAIN NOTES: PEDESTRIOAN DRAINS H INO CASTE IRON GRATES. BASINS ALL YARD DRAIINDEPEY TO BE 812 A N-12 PIPE.. T � i PROJECT DATUM t5 NAVD 1988 ] USES AN ADJUSTMENT 0 ( ) �a OUNTYWIDEI(PINEAlLAS °COUNTY)8 F r LONa ` ^ SUBTRACT 0.88 FROM NGVD 1929 DATUM TO OBTAIN NAVD 1988 i THIS ADJUSTMENT MUST BE KEPT IN MIND WHEN OBTAINING VERTICAL YARD DRAIN ='- INFORMATION FROM OTHER SOURCES. 1 _ try 1 CON TR -TION NOTE, `'' - - :';: \ A SEPARATE RIGHT -OF -WAY PERMIT WILL BE REQUIRED FOR TYPE. SIZE, AND SLOPE OF 1� DRAINAGE SYSTEM O BE ALL WORK WITHIN THE RIGHT -OF -WAY OF ANY OF THE 1 CCCL DETERMINED AT CONSTRUCTON PLAN ADJACENT STREET(S) 7(S) THAT ARE ASSIGNED TO THE CITY. 1 STAGE, SEE DON MELONE (727) 562 -4798 IN ROOM #220 AT THE PARKING LEVEL 1 It 11\ MSB (MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING). NOTE: SEE AMEW PLAN FOR FURTHER DETAIL 1 PREPARED FOR, SHEET DESCRIPTION. C GBB -271 Taylor Woodrow - U.S. Tower Division CLEARWATER BEACH VACATION FLORIDA DESIGN CONSULTANTS, INC. 8430 ENTERPRISE CIRCLE OWNERSHIP PROJECT M:09 7 e ^JMS,SDD ENGINEERS, ENVIRONMENTALISTS, SURVEYORS 8 PLANNERS SUITE 100 , u "EO TM - - --- -- ---- -Y 3030 Slor4ey Blvd, Ne:v Purl Rkh, FL 34655 BRADENTON, FLORIDA 34202 PAVING, GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN ..p Tel, (727) 849 -7588 - Fa., (727) 848 -3648 TEL (941)554 -2000 FAX (94I) 554 -3005 ... � 13 °10131/07 E.B. No. 7421 r"uvvNIM2 utrARIMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER 4r>r' ate: t I J; , I / I II / 1 0 10 20 4D \ / // III > Y Ill" ®LI — Proposed storm Sewer = P­­d crate Inlet S. - _ Hwy✓ _ 10 Proposed Storm Str ture NNmBer T - - ed Silt Fence X J S \ T I i, O , Il \ 00 one e Propos FfIAA Fl tl 2 L —, -. — —' --- — — — - -- w� O—M-d Dranoge Flow Direction _ —_ -- r ow mec m - - - - -- on<m roe o ''- - - - - - -- Nord Sur(oce D,. low Drecbon ti- 1U-1 Spot Elewl on 1 (� I W � + do STAIRSI ROOLt !-` L.• _,^_..�. E• stmg Spot Elewti- ELEV ( -- II 4 .. r. _ B PVC STORAGE i ` C, =Floor Dro'n and Grate Elewlion ko N o E WAY E WAY .!. 1; jI y y,{ t C _ / FLOOR DRAIN NOTES: 'fSt �I f �� +fit r BOOR DRAINS SHOWN HEREIN ARE FOR ILLUSTRATIVE PURPOSES ONLY. 3 SERVICE I !I ( FOR ACTUAL FLOOR DRAIN LOCATIONS AND DETAILS. PLEASE REFER TO R00 LOBBY .4 - ' 4�1 I I _ 1 � PLUMBING SHEETS IN THE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS. 11 ei ;.111 1� - IEJ v v i � - `�,'•. I CONNECTS T OIL AND GREASE I 1 SEPARATOR (BELOW) OPEN 1j1 G 3 t 1 1 y 0 1 1 `4 1y TRABELOW/.ER L _,✓,j �, l-Tl j ` 11 ONE'NAY s. �•V, ORIGINAL i RECEIVED ORAGE -- ,• V � - DEC 13 2007 K PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER PARKING LEVEL 2 NOTE: SEE ARCHITECTS PLAN FOR FURTHER DETAIL TI 1 PREPARED FOR, SHEET DESCRIPTION. w�o0 _ CLEARWATER BEACH VACATION 699 -271 FLORIDA DESIGN CONSULTANTS INC. Taylor Woodrow E U.S. Tower Division 2D9 CONSULTANTS, 8430 ENTERPRISE CIRCLE OWNERSHIP PROJECT •' ° 8 e•JMB,SDD ENGINEERS, ENVIRONMENTALISTS, SURVEYORS 9 PLANNERS SUITE 100 , ar[c TMa•'r••�e feMw•y 303.0 2]) 8Bl.d. A w -PFer: (]2 ) 648 3646 BRADENTON. FLORIDA 34202 PAVING, GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN •.•. TEL (941)554 -2000 FAX (941) 554 -3005 o•r wwe.. 13 O /3l /07 E.B. No. 7421 X ! / � ' / / » 71 1 It 20 40 LEGEND 0 EE STORAGE o TAI N ME FOR ILLUSTRATIVE PURPOSES ONLY. EIRICE �LLOBBY �OCATIONS AND DETAILS, PLEASE REFER TO V. so S. U AD CO EP SUPPORT f 2667' ORIGINAL RECEIVED DEC 13 2007 A PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER PARKING LEVEL 3 NOTE: SEE ARCHITECTS PLAN FOR FURTHER DETAIL PREPARED FOR, SHEET DESCRIPTION, IS ;-211 CLEARWATER BEACH VACATION 209 Taylor Woodrow U.S. Tower Division FLORIDA DESIGN CONSULTANTS, INC. 8430 ENTERPRISE CIRCLE OWNERSHIP PROJECT JMS,SDD ENGINEERS, ENVIRONMENTALISTS, SURVEYORS 6 PLANNERS SUITE 100 3030 St,k*y 3-- N.._ P-1, R;­ 34655 BRADENTON. FLORIDA 311202 PAVING, GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN EB NO. 7421 A 1. WHERE UNDERGROUND WATER MAINS AND HYDRANTS ARE REQUIRED, THEY SHALL BE INSTALLED, COMPLETED, AND IN LEGEND SERVICE PRIOR TO BUILDING CONSTRUCTION, AS PER NFPA 241. 2. CONTRACTOR TO EXPOSE THE EXISTING SANITARY SEWER LATERAL AND CALL FLORIDA DESIGN CONSULTANTS TO VERIFY THE EXISTING ELEVATION, AND POINT OF CONNECTION, PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION OF THE SANITARY SEWER SERVICE. = Proposetl 5an t,y Sewer & Service 3. LOCATION OF EXISTING SANITARY LATERALS, EXISTING RECLAIMED WATER MAIN, EXISTING POTABLE WATER MAIN AND EXISTING GAS MAIN PER CITY OF CLEARWATER UTILITY ATLAS. CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. = Proposed W.I., line one Valve 4, FOR LOCATION OF EXISTING RECLAIMED WATERLINE AND POINT OF CONNECTION, PLEASE REFER TO LANDSCAPE PLANS. =Proposetl Storm Sewer 5. FOR LOCATION OF GAS SERVICE, PLEASE CONTACT CLEARWATER GAS. 6. DUCTILE IRON PIPE MUST BE INSTALLED BETWEEN ANY TAP AND WATER METER. DUCTILE IRON PIPE MUST BE INSTALLED BETWEEN ANY TAP AND BACKFLOW PREVENTOR DEVICE. AT LEAST ONE JOINT OF DUCTILE IRON PIPE SHALL BE .. E.st ng Suntory Sewer Mon INSTALLED ON THE SERVICE SIDE OF ANY BACKFLOW PREVENTOR DEVICE. Y Proposed Fir,, Hyd-t PPE SPECIFICATIONS 1 PVC PPE (6' AND 87 SAMTARY SEWER ,F = Proposetl FT,,, Dept Connection (FDC) PVC PIPE (SDR35) POLWWL CHLORIDE SEWER PIPE SHALL CONFORM TO ASTM D -3034 SDR35 D -1784 (PVC COMPOUND), LATEST - = E.mtng Hyd,o Assembly REVISION, OR AS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED. ALL PVC SEWER PIPE SHALL BE CONSPICUOUSLY LABELED WITH THE MANUFACTURER'S NAME, NOMINAL PIPE SIZE. APPLICABLE MATERIAL CODE OR PVC CELL STANDARD DIMENSION RATIO NUMBER, PRODUCT TYPE, = Pro oiled Bvldn F' t - 0 9 D J ` ODE AND NSF STANDARD SPECIFICATION DESIGNATION, PRODUCTIONS RECORD CODE AND NSF CERTIFICATION SEAL AND WILL BE COLOR CODED GREEN, PIPE ; WILL BE A MAXIMUM 13 LAVING LENGTH, APPROVED PRODUCTS: ­M/BLUE BRUTE. H &W, E.T.I. CERTAINT EED (W /INTEGRAL BELL). AQUA -TITE. NORTHSTAR, CANTEX, VULCAN, DAVIS- DAWITE. 2 PVC PPE (LESS THAN 41 WATER DISTRIBUTION PVC PIPE LESS THAN 4" SHALL BE MADE FROM CLEAN, NEW NSF APPROVED TYPE 1. GRADE 1 PvC CONFORMING TO ASTM SPECIFICATIONS D1784 AND D2241 OR LATEST REVISIONS THEREOF. AND BE SUITABLE FOR USE AT MAXIMUM HYDROSTATIC WORKING PRESSURES OF 20D PSI AT 23 DEGREES C (73.4 DEGREES F). PIPE SHALL BE FURNISHED IN STANDARD 20' LENGTHS WITH JOINTS BEING OF THE PUSH -ON INTEGRAL BELL TYPE SUPPLIED WITH GASKETS INSTALLED. PIPE SHALL BE MARKED WITH THE NSF MARK INDICATING ITS APPROVAL FOR POTABLE WATER. ALL PIPE SHALL BE CLEAN AND ENDS SHALL BE TARPED DURING SHIPMENT. APPROVED PRODUCTS: J -M, CERTAINTEED WITH INTEGRAL BELL, HEP, H &W. 3. PVC PPE (WAND ABOVE) WATER DISTRBU IM IT AWWA WITH PUSH -ON INTEGRAL BELL JOINTS AND PVC PIPE (0900): PVC PIPE (4- AND LARGER) SHALL IN ACCORDANCE WITH WW 0900. . SUPPLIED IN STANDARD 20' LENGTHS. NO SOLVENT- CEMENT PIPE OR FITTINGS WILL BE ACCEPTED. ALL 4' PIPE SHALL BE PRESSURE CLASS 150 WITH A DR OF 18, PVC PIPE 6" AND ABOVE SHALL BE PRESSURE CLASS 150 WITH A DR OF 18. PIPE SHALL BE MARKED AS L' DETAILED IN AWWA COBB AND BE FURNISHED WITH AN AFFIDAVIT THAT IT COMPLIES WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF AWWA 0900, ALL PIPES INSIDE FIRE PROTECTION WITHIN BUILDING PERIMETERS SHALL BE PRESSURE CLASS 200 WITH A DR OF 14 ALL PIPE FURNISHED UNDER R THIS SPECIFICATION WILL PR SSUR WILL BE COLOR CODED BLUE ALL PIPE SHALL BE CLEANED AND ENDS SHALL BE TARPED DURING SHIPMENT. APPROVED PRODUCTS: J - N M /BLUE BRUTE H &W, ETI CERTAINTEED (W /INTEGRAL BELL), AOUATITE NORTHSTAR CAN -TE% WLCAN, DAVIS DAVTITE CLASS 50 6' -12' CLASS 61 (4' 4. DUCTILE iiO1J PUSFHON ( ), ) PPE DUCTILE IRON PUSH ON PIPE SHALL BE THICKNESS OF THE APPROPRIATE CLASS NORMAL AND SHALL CONFORM TO AWWA JOINT 6 MATERIAL AWWA C111 -79. OR UkSTES1 REVISION THEREOF. PIPE SHALL BE FURNISHED HI NORMAL 18E LAYING LENGTHS WITH ALL JOINT MATERIAL INCLUDING CASKETS AND LUBRICANTS. PIPE SHALL BE LINED WITH A STANDARD THICKNESS CEMENT LINING AND SHALL CONFORM TO AWWA C104 -80. APPROVED PRODUCTS: GLOW, AMERICAN CAST IRON- FASTITE, US PIPE & FOUNDRY, Mc WANE -MOH, GRIFFIN. SAMTARY SEWER NOTES 1. ALL MATERIALS AND CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH CITY OF CLEARWATER SEWER SYSTEM STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS AS WELL AS CONTRACT SPECIFICATIONS 0 R THE EXISTING SANITARY SYSTEM ALLOWED T NT 2. NO DEBRIS SHALL BE ENTER 3. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE ALL BRACING, SHEETING OR SHORING NECESSARY TO CONSTRUCT AND PROTECT THE EXCAVATION AGAINST COLLAPSING. ALL CONSTRUCTION SHALL ADHERE TO THE TRENCH SAFETY ACT REQUIREMENTS. TRENCHES SHALL BE KEPT DRY WHILE PIPE IS IN D WAT RING SHALL BE PROVIDED WHERE NECESSARY. BE G LAO E E WITH COMPACTED SELECTED BACKFILL MATERIAL 4. PIPE WILL BE ON DRY, UNDISTURBED SOIL. WET UNSUITABLE MATERIAL WILL BE REPLACED CO C ED E AS APPROVED BY THE SOILS ENGINEER. 5. BACKFILL MATERIAL WILL BE SOLIDLY TAMPED AROUND THE PIPES IN 6" LAYERS UP TO A LEVEL OF AT LEAST ONE FOOT ABOVE THE TOP OF ' THE PIPE. IN AREAS TO BE PAVED, BACK -FILL WILL BE COMPACTED TO A MINIMUM OF 98% OF THE MAXIMUM DENSITY AS DETERMINED IN THE FIELD BY THE METHODS PRE - SCRIBED IN PASHTO T -180 IN 12- LAYERS TO THE PROPOSED PAVEMENT. 6. SANITARY SEWER SERVICE WILL BE SUPPLIED BY THE CITY OF CLEARWATER J. THE EXTERIOR AND INTERIOR OF ALL PRECAST MANHOLES SHALL BE COATED WITH AT LEAST 15 MILS DRY THICKNESS OF PROCO EP- 214 -351 EPDXI- MASTIC AS MANUFACTURED BY PROTECTIVE COATINGS INC. WATER DISTRIBUTION NOTES �. 1. ALL MATERIALS AND CONSTRUCTION FOR THE FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEM AND THE DOMESTIC WATER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CONTRACT SPECIFICATIONS AND CITY OF CLEARWATER SPECIFICATIONS. 2. WATER MAINS SHALL BE 30" (MIN) BELOW PROPOSED GRADE AT THE WATER MAIN CENTER LINE. 3. ALL POL-L CHLORIDE PIPE SHALL BE LAID WITH AN INSULATED 12 GAUGE A.W.G. SOLID STRAND COPPER WIRE WOUND AROUND THE PIPE FORMING ONE COMPLETE SPIRAL PER JOINT ` PIPE. THIS WIRE IS TO BE CONTINUOUS WITH SPLICES MADE ONLY BY METHODS APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER. THIS WIRE IS TO BE SECURED TO ALL VALVES, TEES, AND ELBOWS. SEE ARTICLE 41.02(B)(2) PART "B" TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS. C ITY 0 F CLEARWATER CONTRACT SPECIFICATIONS AND STANDARDS. ' 4. MINIMUM SEPARATION BETWEEN WATER AND SANITARY SEWER AND STORM SEWER LINES TO BE 10' HORIZONTAL AND 18" VERTICAL. 5. POTABLE WATER SERVICE WILL BE SUPPLIED BY THE CITY OF CLEARWATER. 6. SAMPLE TAPS SHALL BE PROVIDED AT 500 FT. INTERVALS ALONG MAINS AND AT ALL TEMPORARY BLOW OFF LOCATIONS. 7. LENGTHS ARE t FROM CENTER OF FITTING TO CENTER OF FITTING. 8. ALL FIRE LINE AFTER METERS AND DOUBLE DETECTOR CHECK ASSEMBLIES TO BE RESTRAINED, DUCTILE IRON, CLASS 350 (200 psi). 9. THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, AT THE APPLICANT'S EXPENSE, WILL RELOCATE ANY / ALL WATER METERS THAT HAVE TO BE RELOCATED AS PART OF THIS DEVELOPMENT. 10. ALL WATER /FIRE LINE EXTENSIONS TO CONFORM TO CITY STANDARDS. tt. THE CITY OF CLEARWATER WILL PROVIDE WATER TAP, SET THE METER AND A B.F.P.D. (BACK FLOW PREVENTOR DEVICE) IF APPLICABLE. APPLICANT 15 RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL ASSOCNTED FEES. 12. ALL UNDERGROUND WATERMAINS AND HYDRANTS ARE TO BE INSTALLED PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION ACCORDING TO NFPA -241. 13. CLEARANCE OF 7,5' IN FRONT OF AND TO THE SIDES OF EACH FIRE HYDRANT. WITH A 4' CLEARANCE TO THE REAR OF THE HYDRANT ARE REQUIRED TO BE MAINTAINED AS PER NFPA -1. UTILITY NOTE ABOVE- GROUND AND UNDER - GROUND UTILITIES ARE IN THE AREA OF THIS PROJECT. PROCEED WITH CAUTION - CALL - SUNSHINE" AND THE U TILI TY OWNER S) 2 DAYS ADV AN CE BEFORE BEGINNING WORK 1- 800 -432 -4770. FDC NOTE EACH FDC WILL HAVE A SIGN THAT STATES "NO PARKING FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTION '. THE SIGN MUST MEET THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (FDOT) STANDARDS. NOTE: THE FOOT HAS ADOPTED THE FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATIONS (FHWA) MANUAL ON UNIFORM TRAFnC CONTROL DEVICES (MUTCD). CLEARANCE OF 7.5' TO THE FRONT, SIDES AND REAR OF FDC ARE REQUIRED TO BE MAINTAINED. STANDARD SEPARATION STATEMBU FOR WATER /SEWER CONFLICTS _ 1. SANITARY SEWERS CROSSING UNDER WATER MAINS SHALL BE LAID TO PROVIDE A MINIMUM VERTICAL DISTANCE OF 12 INCHES BETWEEN THE BOTTOM OF THE UPPER PIPE AND THE OUTSIDE BELL /TOP OF THE LOWER PIPE WHENEVER POSSIBLE. SANITARY SEWERS CROSSING OVER WATER MAINS SHALL BE LAID TO PROVIDE A MINIMUM VERTICAL DISTANCE OF 18 INCHES BETWEEN THE OUTSIDE BELL /BOTTOM OF THE UPPER PIPE AND THE TOP OF THE LOWER PIPE WHEREVER POSSIBLE. 2. WHERE SANITARY SEWERS CROSS A WATER MAIN WITH LESS THAN THE REQUIRED VERTICAL DISTANCE, BOTH THE SEWER AND THE WATER MAIN SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED OF CLASS 54 DUCTILE IRON PIPE (DIP) AT THE CROSSING. SUFFICIENT LENGTHS OF DIP MUST BE USED TO PROVIDE A MINIMUM SEPARATION OF 10 FEET BETWEEN ANY TWO JOINTS. ALL JOINTS ON THE WATER MAIN WITHIN 20 FEET OF THE CROSSING MUST BE LEAK FREE, AND MECHANICALLY RESTRAINED. A MINIMUM VERTICAL CLEARANCE OF 6 INCHES MUST BE MAINTAINED AT THE CROSSING. 3. ALL CROSSINGS SHALL BE ARRANGED SO THAT THE SEWER PIPE JOINTS AND THE WATER MAIN PIPE JOINTS ARE EQUIDISTANT FROM THE POINT OF CROSSING (PIPES CENTERED ON THE CROSSING). 4. WHERE A NEW PIPE CONFLICTS WITH AN EXISTING PIPE, THE NEW PIPE SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED OF DIP AND THE CROSSING SHALL BE ARRANGED TO MEET THE REQUIREMENTS ABOVE. 5. A MINIMUM 10 -FOOT HORIZONTAL SEPARATION SHALL BE MAINTAINED BETWEEN ANY TYPE OF SEWER AND WATER MAIN IN PARALLEL INSTALLATIONS WHENEVER POSSIBLE. 6. IN CASES WHERE IT IS NOT POSSIBLE TO MAINTAIN 10 -FOO7 HORIZONTAL SEPARATION, THE WATER MAIN MUST BE LAID IN A SEPARATE TRENCH OR ON AN UNDISTURBED EARTH SHELF LOCATED ON ONE SIDE OF THE SEWER OR FORCE MAIN AT SUCH AN ELEVATION THAT THE BOTTOM OF THE WATER MAIN IS AT LEAST 18 INCHES ABOVE THE TOP OF THE SEWER. 7. WHERE IT IS NOT POSSIBLE TO MAINTAIN A VERTICAL DISTANCE OF 18 INCHES IN PARALLEL INSTALLATIONS. THE WATER MAIN SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED OF DIP (IF AVAILABLE IN THE SIZE PROPOSED) WITH A MINIMUM VERTICAL DISTANCE OF 6 INCHES. THE WATER MAIN SHOULD ALWAYS BE ABOVE THE SEWER. JOINTS ON THE WATER MAIN SHALL BE LOCATED AS FAR APART AS POSSIBLE FROM JOINTS ON THE SEWER OR FORCE MAIN (STAGGERED JOINTS). B. ALL DIP SHALL BE CLASS 54 OR HIGHER. ADEQUATE PROTECTIVE MEASURES AGAINST CORROSION SHALL BE USED. 9. A MINIMUM COVER OF 30" (2.5') SHALL BE MAINTAINED BETWEEN THE TOP OF ALL WATER MAINS AND THE PROPOSED GROUND (TYPICAL). PREPARED FOR, FLORIDA DESIGN CONSULTANTS, INC. e^JMS,SDD ENGINEERS, ENVIRONMENTALISTS, SURVEYORS 8 PLANNERS cxzo ,wo.,zze T4 couuzr 3030 SI.-Y Bl", New P4 Ric Aey FL 34655 Tel, (727) 849 -7588 - Fax: (727) 648 -3648 E.B. No. 742) \1 14 i r5 \ 1 \ 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 17 1 1 1� \ 1 � 1 �4 1 / 'n 0 10 20 40 r � ' II CONSTRUCT 8 n> III 1 ./ . / I TAPPING SLIDE VC AND.; SEE SHEET RA VALVE (BY CITY) ,' ) (.: (� .- i nREUNE INFORMATION CCCL - r 141 .- B' TEE A I I � 1 ' 4 GV I I a- TEE Z - - METER (SIZE TBD) DOMESTIC DWM s S I ISTAIRSi III � G I I t( f I t ..;LAY 1 i C i 430 S GULFVIEW BLVD r ,a )pN €v✓A ' ONE wAV ..- - - "p�Y , 1 vG ._ .,I> 1 R 7_ 1 6 'r ! < E Z V. V l 0 l �. .p t Rq { J I J rl,ii 1,j ♦ 1 'H' � � � �ITJ- ■ l r t � f � 0 _ . 15 LF OF 8- PVC X� fY {..fir �_\ SrIj.J O LOOS tt ) CLEANOUT r' frr F 5 T N: 1 CONNECT TO EXISTING - ■ IE = 2.44 Tj ;tlf SANITARY MANHOLE J ADJUST EXISTING MH RIM AS REQUIRED / \(ZUCJ7r Z { 7 CONNECT PROPOSED Z SANITARY SERVICE TO - 1° J J gtr 1 EXISTI229MH tSTAR T T T � ) 't CONDUIT BANK j DET;IL J SHEET 13 �,( ■- ,4 TRANSFORMER r! TRASH /+ HOLDING - _ 1 r 1 \ __CCCL 1 1 1 SHEET DESCRIPTION, Taylor Woodrow - U.S. Tower Division CLEARWATER BEACH VACATION 8430 ENTERPRISE CIRCLE OWNERSHIP PROJECT SUITE 100 BRADENTON. FLORIDA 34202 UTILITY PLAN TEL (941)554 -2000 FAX (941) 554 -3005 4 `4 CONSTRUCTION NOTE: i A SEPARATE RIGHT -OF -WAY PERMIT WILL BE REQUIRED FOR ALL WORK WITHIN THE RIGHT -OF -WAY OF ANY OF THE ADJACENT STREET(S) THAT ARE ASSIGNED TO THE CITY. SEE DON MELONE (727) 562 -4798 IN ROOM #220 AT THE MSB (MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING). PLANNING DEPARTMENY CITY OF CLEARWATER E i B 8 0 5 7 g s i 1 WHERE UNDERGRDUNO WATER MANS AND HYDRANTS ARE REQUIRED, THEY SIAALL BE NSTALIED COMPLETED AND N SERVICE PRIOR TO BuL CONSTRUCTION AS PER * ^ LEGEND 1. CONTRACTOR TO E POSE THE E0 uG IT- SEWER TEA AND C FLORIDA DESGU CONSULTANTS TO -11 THE Ex SING ELEVATrou AND POM Of ONNECTION, PRIOR HST LE x Of THE SANNARY SMER GINVEE. ;� -OLLL YL & VALVE .�IL f A.v q ­ O E Si NG SIIIAm RALS. EXIST RECUMED w ER MAU EXISTING POTABLE WATER MAx AND EXISTING GAS HAN PER CTV OF CLEARWATER UTnm ETO = Propo,,d Sant,,y Sewer & Service ATLAS. NTRACTOR TO VER ry PRIOR C Ex SING RECLAMED WATERLINE .00 PENT OF CONNERON PLEASE REFER TO LANDSCAPE PUNS.I ..... a A �j'�L- -. Il M 4. FOR LOGTION OF 5 FOR LOGTgN Of GAS SERVICE. PLEASE CONTACT CLURWATER GAS f ,- r Proposed W.I., U and VOIYR f BE INSTALLED BETWEEN Nt TAP AND WATER METER DUCTILE RCN BETWEEN ANY TAP AND BACKFLOW PNEVTNTGN 6. DUCT LE ROIL PIPE MUST PIPE BE ON THC SERVICE SDF OfE S BE xSAUED O[VICE AT LEAST ONE JOUi Of DUCTILE ROIL BA[KROW PREVENTOR DM<E �,'I 1 E WORK TO BE DONE BY LICENSED CONTRAER WITH CLASS i OR V LKE T. AL, UNDERGROUND IRE LINE R 15E �� T41w ProDOSed Slwm Sewer ALL F DEPARTMENT CONNECTIONS (FDC) SNALL BE °STALLED AT LUST 15 FEET FROM THE FACE OF THE BULDNG AND BETWEEN 25 FEET AND SO FEET FROM THE .. _ __. __.__ - - Exislm9 WEler Mon NEAREST FINE HvORAH1 ASSEMBLY ((NA) TRANSFO R FHA THE DMAN OF THE FINE STANDPPC/SPRNKE SYSE BE DES ED TO NEGATE THE USED Of ANY PRESSURE REGULATION DENCES (PRD) IH ORDER TO PR A SAFE "B" NK NNENT FOR fRErq ER USAGE E .. = ExisUn9 SOnitory Sewer Mom " TO I'S BUILDING WILL MEET 1HE HIGH RISE SUADING CRITERM. DEFIED IT THE FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION CODE. ZOOM EDITION ti' Proposed Fire 11,. O l 11 A 911 NADIO REPGTER /ANTENNA BOOSTER SYSTEM MUST BE RSTALLED IN ORDER TO COMPLY WITH ORDINANCE N°. 7617-06 RApO REGUTATgNS FOR BUILD NGS. Y Proposed Fire Dept. Connecl'on (FDC) PPE SPECIFICATIONS EI, stn9 Hydr t A ... T,bly L PVC PPE 6' AND 87 SANITARY SEWER PVC PPE (SDR35) PDLYVNYL CHLORIDE SEWER PPE SHALL CONFORM 10 ASTM D-2034 SDR35 D -1784 (PVC COMPOUND). LATEST REVISION, OR AS OTHERWISE = Proposed BU Idin9 Footprint SPECIFED. ALL PVC SEWER PPE SHALL BE CONSPICUOUSLY LABELED 171 THE MANUFACTURER'S NAME NOMINAL PPE SIZE APPLICABLE MATERIAL CODE OR PVC CELL CLASSFGTON STANDARD OMENS ON RATIO NUMBER PRODUCT TYPE STANDARD SPEC ECATON DESIGNATION. PRODUCTIONS RECORD CODE AND NSF CERTIFICATION SEAL AND WILL BE COLOR CODED GREEN. PPE WILL BE A MAXIMUM 13 LAYNG LENGTH. APPROVED PRODUCTS: J M /BLUE BRUTE. H &W, ET = 5 FT WIDE EXTERIOR FIRE DEPARTMENT ACCESS PATH (450 LP) CERTAINTEED (W /INTEGRAL BELL) MXM TTE. NORIHSTAR, GNTE% VULCAN, DAMS- DAVTITE, 18 INCHES BETWEEN THE OUTSIDE BELL /BOTTOM OF THE UPPER PIPE AND THE TOP OF THE LOWER PIPE WHEREVER 2- PVC PPE (LESS THAN 47 WATER DISTRISUMN PVC PPE LESS THAN i SHALL BE MADE FROM CLEAN, NEW AST APPROVED TYPE 1, GRADE 1, PVC CONFORMING TO AGIN SPECIFICATIONS D17B4 AND D2241 POSSIBLE. OR LATEST RC THEREOF. AND BE FOR USE AT MAXIMUM HYDROSTATIC WORKING OF 200 PSI AT 23 DEGREES C 734 DEGREES F. PRESSURES N ) - - ­ -ON INTEGRAL PIPE SHALL BE ED WASHED IN STANDARD 2G LENGTHS WITH JOINTS BEING AB THE PUSH LL PIPE SH BELL TYPE SUPPLIED WITH GASKETS INSTALLED. PIPE ZG LEE SHALL BE wftNED WITH THE NET MARK ND GI NG ITS APPROVAL FOR POTABLE WATER ALL PIPE SHALL BE CLEAN AND ENDS SHALL BE TARPED WRING SHIPMENT. APPROVED PRODUCTS J M, CERTAIMEED WITH INTEGRAL BELL HER. III _ 3. PVC PPE (4' AND ABOVE) WATER DISTREUTgN _ PVC PIPE (C900): PVC PIPE (4' AND LARGER) SHALL IN ACCORDANCE WITH AWWA C900 WITH PUSH -ON INTEGRAL BELL JOINTS AND -'' .. �'��T SUPPLIED IN STANDARD OR 20' LENGTHS. NO SOLVENT- CEMENT PIPE OR FITTINGS WILL BE ACCEPTED. ALL 4" PIPE SHALL BE PRESSURE IN LENGTHS OF DIP MUST BE USED PROVIDE A MINIMUM JOINTS ON THE WATER MAIN WITHIN 20 FEET OF THE CROSSING MUST BE LEAK FREE, AND MECHANICALLY RESTRAINED. CLASS WITH A OF PFU PIPE 6" AND ABOVE SHALL BE PRESSURE CLASS 150 WITH UI DR OF 18. PIPE SHALL BE MARKED AS - `': 4 jt �'. _ - -: ='y) DETAILED IN PROTECTION C90N AND BE FURNISHED WITH AN AFFIDAVIT THAT IT COMPLIES WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF , AL 0900. ALL PIPES DI 91 D INSIDE FIRE PROTECTION LOOP WITHIN BUILDING PERIMETERS SHALL BE PRESSURE CLASS 200 WITH p DR OF 14. ALL PIPE FURNISHED A MINIMUM VERTICAL CLEARANCE OF 6 INCHES MUST BE MAINTAINED AT THE CROSSING. UNDER THIS SPECIFICATION WILL BE COLOR CODED BLUE. ALL PIPE SHALL BE CLEANED AND ENDS SHALL BE TARPED DURING SHIPMENT. \ APPROVED PRODUCTS: J -M /BLUE BRUTE, H &W, E.7.1. CERTAINTEED (W /INTEGRAL BELL). AOUATITE NORTHSTAR CAN -TEX, VULCAN, DAVIS DAVTITE. 3. ALL CROSSINGS SHALL BE ARRANGED SO THAT THE SEWER PIPE JOINTS AND THE WATER MAIN PIPE JOINTS ARE EQUIDISTANT FROM THE POINT OF CROSSING (PIPES CENTERED ON THE CROSSING). 4. DLICTIE HON PUSH -ON PIPE, CLASS 50 (6'-127, CLASS 51(4') DUCTILE IRON PUSH -ON PIPE SHALL BE THICKNESS OF THE APPROPRIATE CLASS AND SHALL CONFORM TO AWWA C151 -76 AND AWWA II,- 15 C111 -79, OR LASTEST REVISION THEREOF. PIPE SHALL BE FURNISHED IN NORMAL 18' LAYING LENGTHS WITH ALL JOINT MATERIAL INCLUDING GASKETS AND LUBRICANTS. PIPE SHALL BE LINED WITH A STANDARD THICKNESS CEMENT LINING AND SHALL CONFORM TO AWW, C104 -80. 111 \I APPROVED PRODUCTS: CLOW. AMERICAN CAST IRON- FASTITE, US PIPE & FOUNDRY, Mc WANE- TYFON, GRIFFIN. L 11 3i I SA ITAW SEWER NOTES 4. WHERE A NEW PIPE CONFLICTS WITH AN EXISTING PIPE, THE NEW PIPE SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED OF DIP AND THE ! CROSSING SHALL BE ARRANGED TO MEET THE REQUIREMENTS ABOVE. 1. ALL MATERIALS AND CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE N ACCORDANCE WITH CITY OF CLEARWATER SEWER SYSTEM STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS AS WELL AS CONTRACT SPECIFI TIONS \ r 2. NO DEBRIS SHALL BE ALLOWED TO ENTER THE EXISTING SANITARY SYSTEM I I . II 3. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE ALL BRACING. SHEETING OR SHORING NECESSARY TO CONSTRUCT AND PROTECT THE EXCAVATION AGAINST COLLAPSING. ALL CONSTRUCTION SHALL ADHERE TO THE TRENCH SAFETY ACT REQUIREMENTS. TRENCHES SHALL BE KEPI DRY WHILE PIPE IS t I 1 BEING LAID. DEWATERING SHALL BE PROVIDED WHERE NECESSARY. \ \ ' !L ` 4. PIPE WILL BE ON DRY. UNDISTURBED SOIL. WET UNSUITABLE MATERIAL WILL BE REPLACED WITH COMPACTED SELECTED BACKFILL MATERIAL, 1 AS APPROVED BY THE SOILS ENGINEER. T I UP T OF AST ONE FOOT ABOVE THE TOP OF 5. BACKFLL MATERIAL WILL BE SOLIDLY TAMPED AROUND HE PIPES N 6 LAYERS O A LEVEL 0 LE ` THE PIPE. IN AREAS TO BE PAVED, IN AASLL WILL BE COMPACTED TO A MINIMUM OF 987 OF THE MAXIMUM DENSITY AS DETERMINED IN THE I FIELD BY THE METHODS PRE - SCRIBED IN MSHTO T -180 IN 12" LAYERS TO THE PROPOSED PAVEMENT. °AGJ{ 6. SANITARY SEWER SERVICE WILL BE SUPPLIED BY THE CITY OF CLEARWATER "" \ ]. THE EXTERIOR AND INTERIOR OF ALL PRECAST MANHOLES SMALL BE COATED WITH AT LEAST 15 MILS DRY THICKNESS OF PROCO EP- 214 -351 EPDXI - MASTIC AS MANUFACTURED BY PROTECTIVE COATINGS INC. \ 1 WATER DISTIE11131/TION NOTES - 1 ALL MATERIALS AND CONSTRUCTION FOR THE FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEM AND THE DOMESTIC WATER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM SHALL BE IN \ ACCORDANCE WITH THE CONTRACT SPECIFICATIONS AND CITY OF CLEARWATER SPECIFICATIONS. ! 2. WA T ER MAINS SHALL BE 30 ( MIN ) BELO W PROPOSED GRADE AT THE WATER MAIN CENTER LINE. _ \ 3. ALL POLYVINYL CHLORIDE PIPE SHALL BE LAID WITH AN INSULATED 12 CA GE A.W.G. SOLID STRAND COPPER WIRE WOUND AROUND THE PIPE \ FO MING ONE L SPIRAL R JOINT F THIS WIRE IS TO BE SPLICES ONLY BY METHODS APPROVED BY _' THHEENGINEER.0 O BE SECURED TO ALL VALVES, TEES. AND ELBOWS. THIS WIRE S T WS. SEE ARTICLE 41Q2 (B (2) B PART TECHNICAL SEE DON MELONE (727) 562 -4798 IN ROOM #220 AT THE SPECIFICATIONS. CITY OF CLEARWATER CONTRACT SPECIFICATIONS AND STANDARDS. FAR APART AS POSSIBLE FROM JOINTS ON THE SEWER OR FORCE MAIN (STAGGERED JOINTS). 4. MINIMUM SEPARATION BETWEEN WATER AND SANITARY SEWER AND STORM SEWER LINES TO BE 10' HORIZONTAL AND 18" VERTICAL. 456 FROM 5. POTABLE WATER SERVICE WILL BE SUPPLIED BY THE CITY OF CLEARWATER. SOUTH 1 6. SAMPLE TAPS SHALL BE PROVIDED AT 500 F. INTERVALS ALONG MAINS AND AT ALL TEMPORARY BLOW OFF LOCATIONS.% \' \ 7. LENGTHS ARE t FROM CENTER OF FITTING TO CENTER OF FITTING. B. ALL FIRE LINE AFTER METERS AND DOUBLE DETECTOR CHECK ASSEMBLIES TO BE RESTRAINED, DUCTILE IRON, CLASS 350 (200 psi). G 9. THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, AT THE APPLICANT'S EXPENSE. WILL RELOCATE ANY/ ALL WATER METERS THAT HAVE TO BE RELOCATED AS PART OF THIS DEVELOPMENT. 10. ALL WATER /FIRE LINE EXTENSIONS TO CONFORM TO CITY STANDARDS. GROUND (TYPICAL). 11. THE CITY OF CLEARWATER WILL PROVIDE WATER TAP, SET THE METER AND A B.F.P.D. (BACK FLOW PREVENTOR DEVICE) IF APPLICABLE. ' APPLICANT IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL ASSOCIATED FEES. N 12. ALL UNDERGROUND WATERMAINS AND HYDRANTS ARE TO BE INSTALLED PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION ACCORDING TO NFPA -241.1 11 13. CLEARANCE OF 7.5' IN FRONT OF AND TO THE SIDES OF EACH FIRE HYDRANT, WITH A i CLEARANCE TO THE REAR OF THE HYDRANT ARE REQUIRED TO BE MAINTAINED AS PER NFPA -1. UTILITY NOTE ABDVE- GROUND AND UNDER - GROUND UTILITIES ARE IN THE AREA OF THIS PROJECT. PROCEED WITH CAUTION - CALL "SUNSHINE" AND THE V o - \ N 0 10 20 40 �I 'A�c4s4 - n �y`14 L FIRE TRUCK / STAGING AREA i;' I "• : I 8 CV I I I / 1. SHEET 10 B' DCVA WATERMAIN INFORMATION / EXISTING FHA.:,,. \ 8, CV / II TO REMAIN Jl / 23 LF 8" DIP FlRELINE BED I K , a _ -- - -- ND TAPPINGc ( -r X _ r " , SLEEVE &VALVE DH_ I 56 LF 8- DIP gppe�BF, J4��� 4� GIRELINE 25 LF 8 DIP F'.IRELINE I I J c,�''.1'I: r /L i I I I FDC O TI REFER TO 1 SPEC IFlC 1 ;c NOI'I M TE: FIRE COMAND ROOM < f EJ J f NOTE Y8 C r V,F IS ON LEVEL 2 ! < j ! i iTT'.:. 430 S. GULFVIEW BLVD iA CO to II 1 a - r •�- v f i { 1 / LOBBY 0 ' r r I UTILITY OWNER(S) 2 DAYS IN ADVANCE BEFORE BEGINNING WORK 1 -BDO- 432 -477D. 450 FROM .. \ - ,_ .,. ... ".' 1 1 ;� -OLLL YL & VALVE .�IL f A.v q ­ UTILITY �- CONDUIT BANK ..... a A �j'�L- -. Il M (SEE DETAIL SHEET 13) 2� S ) •.:' ':\ ,... -" "� 1\ UTILITY OWNER(S) 2 DAYS IN ADVANCE BEFORE BEGINNING WORK 1 -BDO- 432 -477D. 450 FROM .. \ - ,_ .,. ... ".' 1 1 ;� -OLLL YL & VALVE .�IL f A.v q ­ FDC NOTE EACH FDC WILL HAVE A SIGN THAT STATES "NO PARKING FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTION ". THE SIGN MUST MEET THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF �' NORTH I "'L: 1\ .� ' y i T r , "', - -- Elli"I ..... a A �j'�L- -. Il M y� \ TRANSPORTATION (FOOT) STANDARDS. NOTE: THE FOOT HAS ADOPTED THE FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATIONS (FHWA) MANUAL ON UNIFORM = -" ) •.:' ':\ ,... -" "� 1\ �,'I 1 _ 8 GV TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES (MUTED). CLEARANCE OF 7.5' TO THE FROM, SIDES AND REAR OF FDC ARE REQUIRED TO BE MAINTAINED. .• n -. . - - ;, '\ TRANSFO R FHA 29 LF STANDARD SEPARATION STATEMENT FOR WATER /SEWER OONR.ICTS -:. l' `t + .. -'- F , \ - -"J .4/� j - -.- 8" GV 8' DIP TRASH FlRELINE fi 1. SANITARY SEWERS CROSSING UNDER WATER MAINS SHALL BE LAID TO PROVIDE A MINIMUM VERTICAL DISTANCE OF 12 � INCHES BETWEEN THE BOTTOM OF THE UPPER PIPE AND THE OUTSIDE BELL/TOP OF THE LOWER PIPE WHENEVER ! \ � "�♦ \ �HOIDING - 11" POSSIBLE. SANITARY SEWERS CROSSING OVER WATER MAINS SHALL BE LAID TO PROVIDE A MINIMUM VERTICAL DISTANCE OF \ 18 INCHES BETWEEN THE OUTSIDE BELL /BOTTOM OF THE UPPER PIPE AND THE TOP OF THE LOWER PIPE WHEREVER POSSIBLE. - - j >f -`• _ : 2. WHERE SANITARY SEWERS CROSS A WATER MAIN WITH LESS THAN THE REQUIRED VERTICAL DISTANCE, BOTH THE SEWER AND THE WATER MAIN SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED OF CLASS 54 DUCTILE IRON PIPE (DIP) AT THE CROSSING. SUFFICIENT - "' TO SEPARATION OF 10 FEET BETWEEN ANY TWO JOINTS. ALL i 'I ''• ):'� -'' .. �'��T I♦ - ------ ' 1 LENGTHS OF DIP MUST BE USED PROVIDE A MINIMUM JOINTS ON THE WATER MAIN WITHIN 20 FEET OF THE CROSSING MUST BE LEAK FREE, AND MECHANICALLY RESTRAINED. `, ', t ". - `': 4 jt �'. _ - -: ='y) .. nRE'TAREA _ STAGIrvG AREA A MINIMUM VERTICAL CLEARANCE OF 6 INCHES MUST BE MAINTAINED AT THE CROSSING. '. '-' } Y' 3. ALL CROSSINGS SHALL BE ARRANGED SO THAT THE SEWER PIPE JOINTS AND THE WATER MAIN PIPE JOINTS ARE EQUIDISTANT FROM THE POINT OF CROSSING (PIPES CENTERED ON THE CROSSING). "1 II,- 15 SPECIFlC r -'I \' 1 +Tf4 'r V NOTERYeo 4. WHERE A NEW PIPE CONFLICTS WITH AN EXISTING PIPE, THE NEW PIPE SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED OF DIP AND THE ! CROSSING SHALL BE ARRANGED TO MEET THE REQUIREMENTS ABOVE. - ''A'' \' f- '^ 'I �F 5. A MINIMUM 10 -FOOT HORIZONTAL SEPARATION SHALL BE MAINTAINED BETWEEN ANY TYPE OF SEWER AND WATER MAIN IN PARALLEL INSTALLATIONS WHENEVER POSSIBLE. TAIN 10 -FOOT HORIZONTAL SEPARATION, 6. IN CASES WHERE IT IS NOT POSSIBLE TO MAIN THE WATER MAIN MUST BE LAID IN A SEPARATE TRENCH OR ON AN UNDISTURBED EARTH SHELF LOCATED ON ONE SIDE OF THE SEWER OR FORCE MAIN AT SUCH AN ELEVATION THAT THE BOTTOM OF THE WATER MAIN IS AT LEAST 18 INCHES ABOVE THE TOP OF THE SEWER. _ _ _ _ "- ` _ -- - -� CONSTRUCTION NOTE: A SEPARATE RIGHT -OF -WAY PERMIT WILL BE REQUIRED FOR 7. WHERE IT IS NOT POSSIBLE TO MAINTAIN A VERTICAL DISTANCE OF 18 INCHES IN PARALLEL INSTALLATIONS, THE WATER 1 ALL WORK WITHIN THE RIGHT -OF -WAY OF ANY OF THE _ MAIN SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED OF DIP (IF AVAILABLE IN THE SIZE PROPOSED) WITH A MINIMUM VERTICAL DISTANCE OF 6 + ADJACENT STREET(S) THAT ARE ASSIGNED TO THE CITY. INCHES. THE WATER MAIN SHOULD ALWAYS BE ABOVE THE SEWER. JOINTS ON THE WATER MAIN SHALL BE LOCATED AS `-_CCCL SEE DON MELONE (727) 562 -4798 IN ROOM #220 AT THE FAR APART AS POSSIBLE FROM JOINTS ON THE SEWER OR FORCE MAIN (STAGGERED JOINTS). \ MSB (MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING). 8. ALL DIP SHALL BE CLASS 54 OR HIGHER. ADEQUATE PROTECTIVE MEASURES AGAINST CORROSION SHALL BE USED. + \1 9. A MINIMUM COVER OF 30" (2.5') SHALL BE MAINTAINED BETWEEN THE TOP OF ALL WATER MAINS AND THE PROPOSED ORIGINAL GROUND (TYPICAL). ' RECITaD N PREPARED FOR, PA SHEET DESCRIPTION, CLEARWATER BEACH VACATION G 71 oc DESIGN CONSULTANTS, INC. Taylor Woodrow - U.S. Tower Division 209 °•JMS,SDD FLORIDA 8430 ENTERPRISE CIRCLE OWNERSHIP PROJECT .. KP. IOA .H ■�L7' ENGINEERS, ENVIRONMENTALISTS, SURVEYORS 8 PLANNERS SUITE 100 °ANEP TP R9MWLx 3030 SI^r1•y 8N8, N°r P.'l RICN°Y FL 34655 BRADENTON. FLORIDA 34202 FIRE DEPARTMENT ACCESS PLAN T411 (727) 849 -7588 - Fo (727) 848 -3648 TEL (941)554 -2000 FAX (941) 554 -3005 •1G. 10/31/07 13 E.B. No. 7421 °•" Iv v u _F'A 11VIENT Clay OF CLEARWATER 4 AL Eeietin �g bl Conc M Im v \ T E. Iw 1 2" Evv. blot W TYPICAL DRIVEWAY CROSS SECTION I' _�e iMinR �d SVe I'CR R w Bock o On State o of CuAa witty o d Sew m! 5' Mn A.te.M Slreel1 2' Dx+nlyR mlve a b me R eI s'roe «ak a Mod,, d one Va m CuNa om '/A pWt boa a arlece 'v u s BRa d am 30W " m o ;;:1eee a note 2. '�\1 /z' EvPPna o« apint n plot weed eAee �bM��µ t� melaw9 w .pn. Alm n :�eMN/eY a �mne. IOlwb. 0.1rA Jw s w.n �.wsat..,. wit s e.esa. mo or ♦ Av!a. Toad Pa mM. a 20 mr. au. IeW WENONEERMGCUARR— R SiRAT w u -EWA. eae.e w. m.rh ..w w`�ca�.m b mu , ew/ImIR �i' ~ TUCRON A Pick Hole 5/e" Min. 4 ir Requed s T o R M — 0000000 ET Non Skid RING - HALF PLAN 0 5 0 0 0 R D Tollern Required of L N0 n 23" F ochi 21' SOLID COVER M etl Surface 22�3/4J9�— � /J /�1�o RING - SECTION Machi -d Surrece/ Minimum Weight 7' 232 lb:, 9' 278 roe. SOLID COVER SECTION NOTES Minimum Weight 128 Ib:. 1. Where road way base is 8- r thicker u e 9" ring, DII other cases 7- ring is permissible. s CLEARWATER. FUORi1N 2. Manufoct urers model of storm ring and cover to PUBl1CrWORKS DMI4SI be approved by City Engineer. 3. Perforated c when required shall be slmilOr to solid covers. SPACRIG a Posts HLTER FABRIC 1 0 BE 6 -1D FEET APART MATERIAL 12 �. ♦ Fat ADD11 AL STRENGTH BE ATTACHED TOAA 6�NPR (uAx) MESH WIRE SCREEN wNlEi HAS BACKFILLED TRENCH BEEN FASTENED TO THE POSTS III Fn11 TIE w�RCRME. A-1111-1 I NCNES OF FILTER m AID nE STEEL w / vvvo ©vv TREHa ATTACHING TWO SILT FENCES PIA IN, END J DRSr RNCc F.TATE ROTH 0, OFOR ES } /FARM MATERIAL OmECImN OF FIMOm WAITERS I I BDR. NAP ' :nalM°e°t° ii %° ISOMETRIC VIEW DROP C1MB1 TR ANS R ON CURB TRANSI ON BACK Di vDE ALK ROW UNE F VATIF ION A -A 2. pempe SLIVHxt . L 1 ne Mtn DleoblllUeeae . Roadway o wnlc —IV Stondcrev D— ]OA W FEOT 0, Mw! Ratlnl MoaBCat"xme. Malcn Eviel'mg' -_`.. Nm' EvlaNny SbewaR pme PIO.E »y =r otn> N"- WOIk'ny Surloa . /s' 6" CarbCyrb E,IeE <. Ty C R w Do II Ev6Wy I Cu RETURNED CURB RAMPS VALLEx CuT1ER LURE RAMP 2:t MAK. $N 8" 12" - IS om ( azuE BvCNmDUW � YVu w »i2 9,C +4noutD rtpNL PS HL —If &cxOaw.NO fASpISA Res ■ W N T E: All emmt mart nya to be tnermppaalle NANDIGAPPED STALL DETAIL ,DOT TT s -3 Aeph. C. w l'111. a 1nRevicea of 2cn nbl g ^ IF . . . . . . . . . . . vvvo ©vv S Ma.. 6-4 Paola A $hwle Be His— Thon Point B orowoge Inatdlotbn (Fro Elewlion) HEEDDEDSRHN.T w oo POS7 NINE it -� o.gMld eme of PONERNG PONDINO HT. IT. FILTER FABRC To SIDE OF POST Ruwa RUNOFF B. MAY (RECOMMENDED) STDeL HT. er B' ENLH -CRAKE C coMPACreO cKFRL STS �yl1ARD TTAR A Ii 6 _[ JL TRENCH WITH NATIVE LL REN WTI OR— mows: ISPECT AND REPAIR FENCE AFTER EACH STORLI EVENT AND WE­ SEDIMENT NHEN NECESSARY. 2. RI SEDIMENT SHALL BE DEPO9TED O AN AREA THAT WILL NOT CONTRIBUTE SEDIMENT OFF -SITE AND CAN BE PERMANENTLY STABILIZED. 1 SILT FEKY,E SHALL BE PLACED ON SLOPE CONTOUR$ 0 MAXIMIZE PONDING EFECIENCY. ASPHALT STREET AND DRIVEWAY REPLACEMENT REQUIRED FOR UTILITY CONSTRUCTION I I h T —I I rEl a rverysoD CONCRETE REPLACEMENT REQUIRED FOR UTILITY CONSTRUCTION FINISH STIR NK JOINT STRUCK JOINT DETAILS JOINT DETAIL TUTS 4" Drop of All Drives I_II �1 -1 /2 "R f- Wearing Surface BROOM FINISH 1/2" K 4" BITUMINOUS STRIP EXPANSION JONT DETAL O Drop Ot All Drives 2 _ "R 6" 2" Wearing 3 "R - / Sur(ace 4 PORTLAND CEMENT CONC. PAVEMENT 1. GENERAL RIGID PAVEMENT CONSISTS OF CONSTRUCTING A SPECIFIED PORTLAND CEMENT CONCRETE PAVING ON A PREPARED SUBGRADE. THE UTILITIES AND OTHER ITEMS IN AND BENEATH THE STREET MUST BE PROPERLY COORDINATED WITH THE CONSTRUCTION OF RIGID PAVEMENT TO AVOID CONFLICTS. THE WORK TO BE DONE SHALL INCLUDE THE FURNISHING OF ALL SUPERVISION, LABOR, MATERIALS, EQUIPMENT AND INCIDENTAL NECESSARY FOR THE PROPOSED RIGID PAVEMENT CONSTRUCTION IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE APPROVED DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATION. 2. CONCRETE STRENGTH REQUIRED: ALL CONCRETE SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH OF 3.000 (PCI) PSI AT 28 DAYS. CONFORMANCE TO STRENGTH REQUIREMENTS SHALL BE DETERMINED BY ACI STANDARD 318, LATEST EDITION. SECTIONS 4.8.2.3 AND 4.8.3. EARTH 1. 6" - 3000 PSI CONCRETE W /6X6 W /2.1X2.1 WWF. 2, 12" STABILIZED SUBBASE TO MIN LBR OF 40 & COMPACTED TO 957 MAX DRY DENSITY (ASTM D1557) TO BE PLACED IN 2 -6" LIFTS. 3. 1/4" PREMOLDED EXPANSION JOINT STRIP - -ZIP- STRIP" l9 20' -0" O.C. MAX. CONCRETE PAVEMENT DETAIL Base L� 4 R:. Campo Red. `i 4 t Bose E.LO C/JJ 5 _ j•' 24• Coinpact'ed 0 s/r � /T /\ 5 /uubgiaae --� STRAIGHT CURB NOTE: When D:ed on high .side of roadways, the cro :s :lope Nis of the gutter shall match the cross slope of the adjacent pavement and the thickness of the lip shall 3• be 6 ", unless otherwise shown on plans. Back of Curb C Co..t,MCuon Symmeb'IODI TYPE 1 CURB About Driveway NTS 131/2- Face of W °o ^ng NOTES: NOTE: CLEANOUT PLUG TO BE Curb _ Surface 1. There shall be o 1/2" seal joint between U.S. FOUNDRY 7621 bock of curb old driveway. OR EQUAL. 3' TRANSITION AT DRIVES 2. Concrete In _bs Shot be 3000 psi. With CLEAN OUT PLUG DETAL KITS fiber mesh reinforcing. Nis ORIGINAL RECEIVED DEC 13 2007 PLANNING DEpARjlwrlvs CITY OF CLEARWATER PREPARED FOR, SHEET DESCRIPTION. 699 -271 N�oz Taylor Woodrow - U.S. Tower Division CLEARWATER BEACH VACATION FLORIDA DESIGN CONSULTANTS, INC. 8430 ENTERPRISE CIRCLE OWNERSHIP PROJECT Nzo9 II p ^JMS,SDD ENGINEERS, ENVIRONMENTALISTS. SURVEYORS 8 PLANNERS SUITE IDO a DAI,Ep ,e 3030 SI.—y FINd N.w P0.1 Ri<n <y tt 3a655 BRADENTON, FLORIDA 34202 PAVING, GRADING Tel, (—) Bas -T'B8 F. (72 y) 846 -3646 TEL (941)554 -2000 FAX (941) 554 -3005 AND DRAINAGE DETAILS D „r ”" ",.yn.p.. -.r.Te 10131/07 13 ' E.B. No. 7421 . . . . . . . . . . CONCRETE REPLACEMENT REQUIRED FOR UTILITY CONSTRUCTION FINISH STIR NK JOINT STRUCK JOINT DETAILS JOINT DETAIL TUTS 4" Drop of All Drives I_II �1 -1 /2 "R f- Wearing Surface BROOM FINISH 1/2" K 4" BITUMINOUS STRIP EXPANSION JONT DETAL O Drop Ot All Drives 2 _ "R 6" 2" Wearing 3 "R - / Sur(ace 4 PORTLAND CEMENT CONC. PAVEMENT 1. GENERAL RIGID PAVEMENT CONSISTS OF CONSTRUCTING A SPECIFIED PORTLAND CEMENT CONCRETE PAVING ON A PREPARED SUBGRADE. THE UTILITIES AND OTHER ITEMS IN AND BENEATH THE STREET MUST BE PROPERLY COORDINATED WITH THE CONSTRUCTION OF RIGID PAVEMENT TO AVOID CONFLICTS. THE WORK TO BE DONE SHALL INCLUDE THE FURNISHING OF ALL SUPERVISION, LABOR, MATERIALS, EQUIPMENT AND INCIDENTAL NECESSARY FOR THE PROPOSED RIGID PAVEMENT CONSTRUCTION IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE APPROVED DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATION. 2. CONCRETE STRENGTH REQUIRED: ALL CONCRETE SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH OF 3.000 (PCI) PSI AT 28 DAYS. CONFORMANCE TO STRENGTH REQUIREMENTS SHALL BE DETERMINED BY ACI STANDARD 318, LATEST EDITION. SECTIONS 4.8.2.3 AND 4.8.3. EARTH 1. 6" - 3000 PSI CONCRETE W /6X6 W /2.1X2.1 WWF. 2, 12" STABILIZED SUBBASE TO MIN LBR OF 40 & COMPACTED TO 957 MAX DRY DENSITY (ASTM D1557) TO BE PLACED IN 2 -6" LIFTS. 3. 1/4" PREMOLDED EXPANSION JOINT STRIP - -ZIP- STRIP" l9 20' -0" O.C. MAX. CONCRETE PAVEMENT DETAIL Base L� 4 R:. Campo Red. `i 4 t Bose E.LO C/JJ 5 _ j•' 24• Coinpact'ed 0 s/r � /T /\ 5 /uubgiaae --� STRAIGHT CURB NOTE: When D:ed on high .side of roadways, the cro :s :lope Nis of the gutter shall match the cross slope of the adjacent pavement and the thickness of the lip shall 3• be 6 ", unless otherwise shown on plans. Back of Curb C Co..t,MCuon Symmeb'IODI TYPE 1 CURB About Driveway NTS 131/2- Face of W °o ^ng NOTES: NOTE: CLEANOUT PLUG TO BE Curb _ Surface 1. There shall be o 1/2" seal joint between U.S. FOUNDRY 7621 bock of curb old driveway. OR EQUAL. 3' TRANSITION AT DRIVES 2. Concrete In _bs Shot be 3000 psi. With CLEAN OUT PLUG DETAL KITS fiber mesh reinforcing. Nis ORIGINAL RECEIVED DEC 13 2007 PLANNING DEpARjlwrlvs CITY OF CLEARWATER PREPARED FOR, SHEET DESCRIPTION. 699 -271 N�oz Taylor Woodrow - U.S. Tower Division CLEARWATER BEACH VACATION FLORIDA DESIGN CONSULTANTS, INC. 8430 ENTERPRISE CIRCLE OWNERSHIP PROJECT Nzo9 II p ^JMS,SDD ENGINEERS, ENVIRONMENTALISTS. SURVEYORS 8 PLANNERS SUITE IDO a DAI,Ep ,e 3030 SI.—y FINd N.w P0.1 Ri<n <y tt 3a655 BRADENTON, FLORIDA 34202 PAVING, GRADING Tel, (—) Bas -T'B8 F. (72 y) 846 -3646 TEL (941)554 -2000 FAX (941) 554 -3005 AND DRAINAGE DETAILS D „r ”" ",.yn.p.. -.r.Te 10131/07 13 ' E.B. No. 7421 Q S f 3 ys Ms ,DMS ,ry4's NOTE: C­ete 1. °e 3,00D v ..4h r— mesh reml°rF q 2- min T— T — 1_3/4 TNP T,PIlm TYPE A TYPE C 9.B, Interlocking Concrete Pavers, Wash Sond /Cement Miv Into Joints 1/2' - 3/4" Sand Setting Clio - 6' (Min) Concrete 3000 PSI Sow Cut E.ist. Asph. Witty Fiber MesM1 12. E.iMing Asphalt 12" E.. Bose Expongion Joint Stabilized Subg,ode FBV 60 2 -14 Delorrnea Reba, (typ) 'All exposed concrete edges 10 De nand tooled. PAVING HEADER DETAIL I�r TdeIIGH TFI F _. �I lo,V dSrym iF -t SLAB REINFORCEMENT W4 Bars 6' Slob x5 Bo" 'CO SLAB SECTION Pipe O.D. TMeM,, BE, CLR BIip On LCyM A TF -I HSI AN51 FSe Blz Me.imth Lmgl`I L MtlMmum. HaH 't H 24 A g• 10' 2• 8• 11 -114' 21 III /4' 183/4' /2' <' 12 28' 22' 16 �. S' 8. 16' p. 32' 4p• 29' D6' 30• W 3p' S5 -Ila• I 54 -3ta D6. 42• 1p 10' S6' 42 85' 59.12' 69' 70.12 48' 48' 11' 1 91. 80• '0' x fA' eZ 95' SERIES TF -1 TIDEFLEX CHECK VALVE NOT TO SCALE 1 CONSTRUCTION NOTE: REFER TO THE OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE SCHEDULE FOR REGULAR MAINTENANCE OF THE VAULT. o� PARKING LEVEL 1 EL =6.00 .., 18' RCP BOTTOM EL =2.37 SUMP EL =1.SD STORMWATER VAULT SECTION �D1 i =10 7 MANHOLE COVER WEIR MANHOLE CDVER EL =4.87 SKIMMER EL =5.50 EL =4.87 WEIR ELEV EL =4.37 BOTTOM OF SKIMMER THROUGH SEAWALL phG O O O t J/ O 0 O O O O 1 THIMBLE PLATES NOT TO SCALE UNDERGROUND DRAINAGE VAULT (SEE SHEET 7 OF 13) -85'- DHW 542 ` ---BOTTOM EL -2.37 STORMWATER VAULT SECTION %A1 1".—'D 7 I8' ID TDEFLEX CHECK VALVE C I EL =1.51 ) THIMBLE PLATE E 13 - 3'x5' -6" SLABS STORMWATER VAULT SECTION OCS 101 DETAIL HIS 7 5' -6' L4nIS Di JD 4M1 Pvc TOP OF SLAB EL-6.2 1'-3' 2' -0' 3o miL PVC " PERFORATED P.V.C. PIPE OR ADS CORRUGATED POLYTHENE PERFORATED UNDERDRAIN(W /SOCK)) 4. s' WEIR SKIMMER B 2.5' EXPANSION MATERIAL BETWEEN SLABS AND C SLAB AT OCS 17 DHW25 =5.42 EE =d.e7 TREATMENT FILTER FABRIC FILTER MEDIA TO BE WASHED SIUCA SAND PER '1TIOT COARSE AGGREGATE ROAD AND BRIDGE SPECIFICATIONS' (902 -4). (157 STONE) UNIFORMITY G­ OF 1.5 OR GREATER, AND 103 (WASHED) DIAMETER EFFECTIVE GRAIN SZE OF .20 TO .55 MM. NO LIMEROCK IN ANY PORTION OF FILTERORAIN ASSEMBLY FILTERDRAIN DETAIL �C1 NTS 7 LEVEL 1 ORIGINAL, REGELI /M DEC 13 2007 PLANNING fDEpAt< wc(Tdl CITY OF CLEARWATER PREPARED FOR, SHEET DESCRIPTIDN, N�oc _ CLEARWATER BEACH VACATION J13,1311/07 FLORIDA DESIGN CONSULTANTS, INC. Taylor Woodrow U.S. Tower Division B43o ENTERPRISE CIRCLE OWNERSHIP PROJECT 12 JM5,SDD ENGINEERS, ENVIRONMENTALISTS, SURVEYORS 8 PLANNERS SUITE 100 Tn°.,rz° T° c°Nex 3030 SI.—y Bid, N°w PP'I Ri hey FL 34655 BRADENTON, FLORIDA 34202 PAVING , GRADING Tm. 1721) 8413 -75138 - Fo.. (727) 848 -3648 TEL (941)554 -2000 FAX (941) 554 -3005 ¢wR °.. E.B. ND. 7421 AND DRAINAGE DETAILS 13 R P 7UMP =1.50 24 A 85' PARKING LEVEL 1 EL =6.00 .., 18' RCP BOTTOM EL =2.37 SUMP EL =1.SD STORMWATER VAULT SECTION �D1 i =10 7 MANHOLE COVER WEIR MANHOLE CDVER EL =4.87 SKIMMER EL =5.50 EL =4.87 WEIR ELEV EL =4.37 BOTTOM OF SKIMMER THROUGH SEAWALL phG O O O t J/ O 0 O O O O 1 THIMBLE PLATES NOT TO SCALE UNDERGROUND DRAINAGE VAULT (SEE SHEET 7 OF 13) -85'- DHW 542 ` ---BOTTOM EL -2.37 STORMWATER VAULT SECTION %A1 1".—'D 7 I8' ID TDEFLEX CHECK VALVE C I EL =1.51 ) THIMBLE PLATE E 13 - 3'x5' -6" SLABS STORMWATER VAULT SECTION OCS 101 DETAIL HIS 7 5' -6' L4nIS Di JD 4M1 Pvc TOP OF SLAB EL-6.2 1'-3' 2' -0' 3o miL PVC " PERFORATED P.V.C. PIPE OR ADS CORRUGATED POLYTHENE PERFORATED UNDERDRAIN(W /SOCK)) 4. s' WEIR SKIMMER B 2.5' EXPANSION MATERIAL BETWEEN SLABS AND C SLAB AT OCS 17 DHW25 =5.42 EE =d.e7 TREATMENT FILTER FABRIC FILTER MEDIA TO BE WASHED SIUCA SAND PER '1TIOT COARSE AGGREGATE ROAD AND BRIDGE SPECIFICATIONS' (902 -4). (157 STONE) UNIFORMITY G­ OF 1.5 OR GREATER, AND 103 (WASHED) DIAMETER EFFECTIVE GRAIN SZE OF .20 TO .55 MM. NO LIMEROCK IN ANY PORTION OF FILTERORAIN ASSEMBLY FILTERDRAIN DETAIL �C1 NTS 7 LEVEL 1 ORIGINAL, REGELI /M DEC 13 2007 PLANNING fDEpAt< wc(Tdl CITY OF CLEARWATER PREPARED FOR, SHEET DESCRIPTIDN, N�oc _ CLEARWATER BEACH VACATION J13,1311/07 FLORIDA DESIGN CONSULTANTS, INC. Taylor Woodrow U.S. Tower Division B43o ENTERPRISE CIRCLE OWNERSHIP PROJECT 12 JM5,SDD ENGINEERS, ENVIRONMENTALISTS, SURVEYORS 8 PLANNERS SUITE 100 Tn°.,rz° T° c°Nex 3030 SI.—y Bid, N°w PP'I Ri hey FL 34655 BRADENTON, FLORIDA 34202 PAVING , GRADING Tm. 1721) 8413 -75138 - Fo.. (727) 848 -3648 TEL (941)554 -2000 FAX (941) 554 -3005 ¢wR °.. E.B. ND. 7421 AND DRAINAGE DETAILS 13 L i Y SERVICE CONNECTION DETAIL NOTES: 1. WATER MAINS TO BE ON NORTH or EAST SIDE OF R.O.W.. APPROX. 4 FL BACK OF CURB UNLESS OTHERWISE AUTHORIZED BY CITY ENGINEER. 2. SERVICE CONNECTIONS TO BE 2 FT. FROM SIDE LOT LINE ON EITHER SIDE OF LOT (SEE SHEET NO. 3). THESE SERVICES TO BE CONSISTENT WITHIN THE SUBDIVISION. DRIVEWAYS SHALL NOT BE BUILT OVER METERS. 3. ALL LINES SHALL BE CHLORINATED AND PRESSURE TESTED (TEST FOR ONE HOUR 0 150 UNDER THE DIRECTION OF THE UTILITIES DEPARTMENT. AFTER SUCCESSFUL COMPLETION OF THE TESTING AND CHLORINATION, THE PRESSURE SHALL REMAIN ON THE SYSTEM AT ALL TIMES. 4. TEN FT. SEPARATION REQUIRED BETWEEN PARALLEL WATER & SANITARY SEWER LINES. ®5. S ADDLE IS REQUIRED FOR ALL SERVICE CONNECTIONS TO MAINS. 6. MINIMUM DISTANCE BETWEEN SERVICE TAPS TO BE NOT LESS THAN 36 ". CLEANOUT PLUG CHARLOTTE Pipe And Foundry Company See NOTE For Traffic Bearing Cover. Part No. 106 Or Equal Con crole Pod B" FEMALE ADAPTER Th ick V -6" So. CHARLOTTE Pipe And Foundry Company Part No. 101 Or Equal 6- or 8"- 1/8 Bend Plug Sewer Main TERMINAL CLEANOUT DETAIL N.T.S. Q Gtt OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA NOTE: Cleanoul Plug Cover To Be EN«INEERING DEPART U.S. Foundry 7623 Or Equal. _ A0 TENMA �ExU. TYPICAL HYDRANT SETTING n.l.s. Connecting Piece ./integrally Fire Hydrant Assembly cast Mech. Joint Gland on (Typ.) e End -DI. Rotatable Mech. Jant Glontl on Other End. Length Varies (See N e to 1) Valve and Hydrant L��A� ro.l. Rotatable M Claud an Plain End — Mech. Joint Valve W ater Moin NOTES: 1. On Hydrants Requiring Runout Last Two Joints Must Be Restrained Per Detail 403 (2 of 2). NOTICE TO CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY THE LATEST CITY STANDARD INDEXES PRIOR TO START OF CONSTRUCTION. P.V.C. PIPE RESTRAINT THE FOLLOWING JONTS MUST BE RESTRAINED IN ALL APPUCATONS: BEND - IN— AND OUT ET 2. ME - OUTLET BRA CH 3. OFFSETS - INLET AND WET 5. PLUGS 6. EAD ENDS 7. HYDRANT RUNOUTS SHALL BE RESTRAINED AS DEAD ENDS I-� L --I Megelug Restrainer (Typ.) 1 I C Ebb. 1500 Series (Typ.) \ ON ALL TEES. A MNIMUM O< S' SHALL BE RESTRAINED ON EACH RUN LEG R _ MNIMUM LENGTH 0 BE ESPINNED ON EACH SIDE OF nTnNt ( /L) FlGUpE2 BASED ON JO" DEPTH BURY, ISO PSI TEST PRESSURE. e' VG MAXIMUM LZE USED IN SYSTEM L Thrust Restraint (Typ.) © Threaded Corporation Slop MUELLER B -25008 or approved equal (Top at 45' Angle) Curb Stop MUELLER H24350 or Ford B43- 332 -WO With Lock Wing end Compression inlet (3/4' or 1" RE ALL LEES, A MNIMUM OF G. RESTRAINED , EACH RUN LEG. 0 meter swivel nut, 1 -1/2 or 2u... L - MINIMUM LENGTH TO BE RESTRAINED ON EACH SIDE OF FITTING (nJ ®�0 FIP tat) or approved equol 150 P4 lESi PRESSURE :(.. FoURES DON'T APPLY M POLY Water Service Tubing Driscopipe 5100 or Endol /Yardley 000l��m� ".Xr O Blue Jet, SDR 9. 3408 Polyethylene Iron service saddle VA Ford FC 202 series 512E .. w /stainless steel bond Water Mail NOTE: THRUST RESTRAINT W SUPJOINi DUT>plp IRON PIPE SHALL BE U.S. PIPE FIELD LOCI( GASKETS FOR TY ION JOIN E w AMERICAN FAST -GRIP L TER, FLORIDA CITY OF iowwsTR.na, and II carted CASK TS FOR AMERICAN FASTTE PIPE. THRUST RESTRAINT ON DUCTLE IRON TRNGS H LL BE PRONGED B THE USE OF MEGALUG RETAINERS AND MECHANICAL JOINT FRTTNCS. 4 2 3 ] ENGINEERING n du C ill is body or 5 10 23 30 ems..' WA AIN SERNCE 7 approved equal. _- coukrcnW CLEANOUT PLUG CHARLOTTE Pipe And Foundry Company See NOTE For Traffic Bearing Cover. Part No. 106 Or Equal Con crole Pod B" FEMALE ADAPTER Th ick V -6" So. CHARLOTTE Pipe And Foundry Company Part No. 101 Or Equal 6- or 8"- 1/8 Bend Plug Sewer Main TERMINAL CLEANOUT DETAIL N.T.S. Q Gtt OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA NOTE: Cleanoul Plug Cover To Be EN«INEERING DEPART U.S. Foundry 7623 Or Equal. _ A0 TENMA �ExU. TYPICAL HYDRANT SETTING n.l.s. Connecting Piece ./integrally Fire Hydrant Assembly cast Mech. Joint Gland on (Typ.) e End -DI. Rotatable Mech. Jant Glontl on Other End. Length Varies (See N e to 1) Valve and Hydrant L��A� ro.l. Rotatable M Claud an Plain End — Mech. Joint Valve W ater Moin NOTES: 1. On Hydrants Requiring Runout Last Two Joints Must Be Restrained Per Detail 403 (2 of 2). NOTICE TO CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY THE LATEST CITY STANDARD INDEXES PRIOR TO START OF CONSTRUCTION. P.V.C. PIPE RESTRAINT THE FOLLOWING JONTS MUST BE RESTRAINED IN ALL APPUCATONS: BEND - IN— AND OUT ET 2. ME - OUTLET BRA CH 3. OFFSETS - INLET AND WET 5. PLUGS 6. EAD ENDS 7. HYDRANT RUNOUTS SHALL BE RESTRAINED AS DEAD ENDS I-� L --I Megelug Restrainer (Typ.) 1 I C Ebb. 1500 Series (Typ.) \ ON ALL TEES. A MNIMUM O< S' SHALL BE RESTRAINED ON EACH RUN LEG R _ MNIMUM LENGTH 0 BE ESPINNED ON EACH SIDE OF nTnNt ( /L) FlGUpE2 BASED ON JO" DEPTH BURY, ISO PSI TEST PRESSURE. e' VG MAXIMUM LZE USED IN SYSTEM NOTE: THRUST RESTRAINT AT nTTNGS AND v vESRUSHA BE BY USE OF BBA IRON MEGALUG RESTRAINERS. RESTRAINT BE W EN PIPE JOINTS SHALL BE BY EBBA RON SERIES ISOa 10 SIDEWALK i, r }0• (2) 4' PVC CONDUIT ^�(4) 2" PVC CONDUIT _ 0� (3) 0" PVC CONDUIT UTILITY CONDUIT BAW DETAIL N. T.S. DUCTILE IRON PIPE RESTRAINT THE FOIOWING JOINTS MUST BE RESTRAINED IN ALL APPLICATONS: . BEND - INLET AND WET TEE - ALL BRANCHES 3. OFFSETS - INLET AND OUTLET P PLUGS 5. HEAD ENDS ), RANT RUNOITS SHALL BE RESTRANED AS DEAD ENDS Restraining Gasket (Typ.) L Thrust Restraint (Typ.) RE ALL LEES, A MNIMUM OF G. RESTRAINED , EACH RUN LEG. 0 ©100 L - MINIMUM LENGTH TO BE RESTRAINED ON EACH SIDE OF FITTING (nJ ®�0 n . CONTACT ENGINEER FOR VALUES nWRES BASED ON 3ti 9 B DEPTH, 150 P4 lESi PRESSURE FoURES DON'T APPLY M POLY WRAPPED PIPE 000l��m� NOM. ELBOWS (deg.) VA NOTE: THRUST RESTRAINT AT nTTNGS AND v vESRUSHA BE BY USE OF BBA IRON MEGALUG RESTRAINERS. RESTRAINT BE W EN PIPE JOINTS SHALL BE BY EBBA RON SERIES ISOa 10 SIDEWALK i, r }0• (2) 4' PVC CONDUIT ^�(4) 2" PVC CONDUIT _ 0� (3) 0" PVC CONDUIT UTILITY CONDUIT BAW DETAIL N. T.S. DUCTILE IRON PIPE RESTRAINT THE FOIOWING JOINTS MUST BE RESTRAINED IN ALL APPLICATONS: . BEND - INLET AND WET TEE - ALL BRANCHES 3. OFFSETS - INLET AND OUTLET P PLUGS 5. HEAD ENDS ), RANT RUNOITS SHALL BE RESTRANED AS DEAD ENDS Restraining Gasket (Typ.) L Thrust Restraint (Typ.) RE ALL LEES, A MNIMUM OF G. RESTRAINED , EACH RUN LEG. SHALL BE ( L - MINIMUM LENGTH TO BE RESTRAINED ON EACH SIDE OF FITTING (nJ DO NOT USE FOR VERTICAL OFFSETS � n . CONTACT ENGINEER FOR VALUES nWRES BASED ON 3ti 9 B DEPTH, 150 P4 lESi PRESSURE FoURES DON'T APPLY M POLY WRAPPED PIPE NOM. ELBOWS (deg.) VA 512E .. NOTE: THRUST RESTRAINT W SUPJOINi DUT>plp IRON PIPE SHALL BE U.S. PIPE FIELD LOCI( GASKETS FOR TY ION JOIN E w AMERICAN FAST -GRIP L 17 18 CASK TS FOR AMERICAN FASTTE PIPE. THRUST RESTRAINT ON DUCTLE IRON TRNGS H LL BE PRONGED B THE USE OF MEGALUG RETAINERS AND MECHANICAL JOINT FRTTNCS. 4 2 3 ] 6 2 5 10 23 30 F CUAW ATER, FLORIDA 12 4 8 17 42 tr M42 C WORKS ADMINISTRATION ENGINEERING 16 5 10 22 53 tr s of 20 6 13 26 6} tr ® THRUST RESTRAINING -_ TYPICAL VALVE SETTING TYPICAL FIRE HYDRANT SETTING s. FA- Back of Curb Adjustable _ Mox. 1S -Min. 4' Valve Box 18" Min. Edge of Pavement 0 24' Max. Valve Be' Distance Varies When Valve Occurs in Roadway. set Base on 10- Comma, Brick. _ I I I I I I I /-M «h. Joint V.IYe ONLY APPROVED //J `Water Main Kennedy Guardian No. K -BID Mech. Joint Valve) Restraining Joint I Muller Centurion No. A -423 I \ U.S. Pipe Metropolitan NOTES: I `Restraining Joint (Typ.) c fARWAT[R, rtoRlw 1. Steamer Connection to Fee, Street. ; nGROA CUM w RKS ADMINISTRATION 2. All Fire Hydronls to hove 5 i/4' Valve Seat. — WGRXS %oululsTRAnoN eF ENGINEERING 3. Fire Hydrants Shall be Placed at Street Comers EERING vKVE r in the R. W. Adjacent to Side Lot Lines TwCN. HttxRANT �SETnNC Whenever Possible, s/oa ° " sETTNe GROSS- SECnON q. See Sheet 3 for Typical Connections & Fittings. CROSS -sECTW BLOWOFF DETAIL n.t. :. 4' Minimum, 12" Maximum Stop Less Check Meter Be. MUELLER H14350 with Lock Wing and Compression inlet or approved equal Water ./ Threoded Corporation Slop Valve Be. MUELLER H15008 or ap al proved equ ( TAP AT 45' ANGLE )� 4'x2" Cap with 2" Boss Plug p Saddle required on 4' D.I. 4" P.V.C. only 4" Resilient Wedge Got, valve Water Service Tubing Iron service saddle x Driscopipe 5100 or Endot /Yordley 9 Ford FC 202 series Blue Jet, SDR 9, 3408 Polyethylene V W /stainless steel band Water Moil or approved equal. Water Main CHLORINATION TAP 90' Bend MJ X SLIP PREPARED FOR. Woodrow - U.S. Tower Division - FLORIDA DESIGN CONSULTANTS INC. Taylor o CONSULTANTS, 8430 ENTERPRISE CIRCLE .R.urR ,° e°MxrN ENGINEERS, ENVIRONMENTALISTS, SURVEYORS 8 PLANNERS SUITE 100 BIN 30 e0 S-1, B49V 76BBw_PO 1 (T27y) e e rice BRADENTON, FLORIDA 34202 Fox TEL (941)554 -2000 FAX (941) 554 -3005 E.B. No. 7421 SHEET DESWIPTICLEARWATER BEACH VACATION OWNERSHIP PROJECT UTILITY DETAILS GRACE E %STING PAVEMEN— / EXISTING ROAD BASE J NOTE: t. TRENCHES LOCATED UNDER PAVEMENT SHALL BE COMPACTED TO 1005 OF MAXIMUN DENSITY BY AASH.T.0. 7-99. METHOD C. 2. TRENCHES NOT LDCATED UNDER PAVEMENT SIALL BE COMPACTED TO A RMNESS EQUAL TO THAT OF THE SOIL ADJACENT 0 TIE TRENCH. 3. REPLACEMENT OF PAVED SURFACES SMALL BE MADE IN ACCORDANCE TO APPLICABLE LOCAL REGUUTONS. TRENCH BACKFLL DETAIL N TS WM 7 TEE - GV BACKFLOW PREVENTOR DEVICE AS REQUIRED BY CITY STANDARD DETAILS GV TYPICAL FIRE LINE THE CONTRACTOR IS TO INSTALL A DUCTILE IRON (DIP) FIRE LINE TO THE LOCATION OF THE BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY. CITY CODE REOUIRES THE INSTALLATION OF ONE JOINT OF DUCTILE IRON PIPE (DIP) ON THE SERVICE SIDE. THE CONTRACTOR IS TO COORDINATE THIS INSTALLATION WITH CITY PERSONNEL. SEE PLANS FOR FIRE LINE SIZE. Flo_ BYPASS DETAIL Approved BOckOOw R..n,en1 Senl �Prevenler N Resilient Seal Flow NOTE: APPROVED DOUBLE -CHECK VALVES I. 0 S & Y Valve Handles will be Chained and Locked. Hersey-B—o Model No. 2 Ames 200D SS Walls Model 709 or 007 TYPICAL DOUBLE CHECK VALVE ASSEMBLY Canbr.ao 40100 NTS 2- Boll Valve J Hose Bibb �� / 3/4' Golvan ized J// 2• Galvanized 2" Corpor ter ,".- Topping Soddle Restrained 2_­� Topped Plug CITY OF CLFARWATER, FL END CONNECTION PUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRA ON ENGINEERING TEMP ANDT i Or OR11 A YA1 I IAMP E T OF I MCI _, 699 -271 DEC 13 :09 13 R 13 10131107 KEY.— All D e.m CITY OF CLEARWATER