Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
FLD2008-04009
eet FLD2008mO4OO 9 351 S GULFVIEW BLVD FRENCHY'S SOUTH BEACH ATLAS # ZONING: T LAND USE: RFH RECEIVED: 04/01/2008 INCOMPLETE: COMPLETE: MAPS: PHOTOS: STAFF REPORT: DRC : �rwater 0 Planning Department 100 South Myrtle Avenue . Clearwater, Florida 33756 Telephone: 727- 562 -4567 . Fax: 727 - 562 -4865 ❑ SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION ❑ SUBMIT 14 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION -Plans and application are required to be collated, stapled, and folded into sets ❑ SUBMIT FIRE PRELIMARY SITE PLAN: $200.00 ❑ SUBMIT APPLICATION FEE $ CASE #: RECEIVED BY (staff initials): DATE RECEIVED: RECEIVED ►� l �� 2009 PLANKNO 0r T CKY OF CLfiARWA ' * NOTE: 15 TOTAL SETS OF INFORMATION REQUIRED (APPLICATIONS PLUS SITE PLAN SETS) FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project (Revised 07/11/2008) PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT A. APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4- 202.A) APPLICANT NAME: MAILING ADDRESS: PHONE NUMBER: CELL NUMBER PROPERTY OWNER(S): List ALL owners on the deed AGENT NAME: MAILING ADDRESS: PHONE .NUMBER: CELL NUMBER: Frenchy's South Beach, Inc.' 419 East Shore Drive, Clearwater, FL 33767 727- 449 -2729 FAX NUMBER: EMAIL: Michael Preston Janet Baustert 419 East Shore Drive, Clearwater, FL 33767 727- 449 -2729 FAX NUMBER: EMAIL: PROJECT NAME: Frenchy's South Beach STREET ADDRESS 351 S. GulfvleW Blvd PARCEL NUMBER(S): 07/29/15/52380/000 /0700 PARCEL SIZE (acres): 0.15 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: See Attachment A PROPOSED USE(S): Restaurant DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST: See Attachment B Specifically identify the request (include number of units or square footage of non - residential use and all requested code deviations; e.g. reduction in required number of parking spaces, specific use, etc.) PROJECT VALUATION: $100,000 PARCEL SIZE (square feet): I: \Frenchy's\Permits \City of Clearwater\Comprehensive Infill Project (FLD) 2008 07- 11.doc 0 0 DOES THIS APPLICATION INVOLVE THE TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS (TDR), A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED PLANNED UNI DEVELOPMENT, OR A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED (CERTIFIED) SITE PLAN? YES _ NO x (if yes, attach a copy of the applicable documents) C.. PROOF OF OWNERSHIP: (Code Section 4- 202.A.5) SUBMIT A COPY OF THE TITLE INSURANCE POLICY, DEED TO THE PROPERTY OR SIGN AFFIDAVIT ATTESTING OWNERSHIP (see page 7) D. WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 3- 913.A) Provide complete responses to the six (6) GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA — Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail: . The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk_ , coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. See Attachment C 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. See Attachment C 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use. See Attachment C 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. See Attachment C 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. See Attachment C 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts, on adjacent properties. See Attachment C ORIGINAL WMED 18 mAR 2009 P JT =aweia A-:V.I l�T r I:\Frenchy's\Permits \City of Clearwater\Comprehensive Infill Project (FLD) 2008 07- 11.doc 1 WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project Criteria) Provide complete responses to the six (6) COMPREHENSIVE INFILL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT CRITERIA — Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail: 1. The development or redevelopment is otherwise impractical without deviations from the use and /or development standards set forth in this zoning district. See Attachment D 2. The development or redevelopment will be consistent with the goals and .policies of the Comprehensive Plan, as well as with the general purpose, intent and basic planning objectives of this Code, and with the intent and purpose of this zoning district See Attachment D 3... The development or redevelopment Will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of surrounding properties. See Attachment D 4. Adjoining properties will not suffer substantial detriment as a result of the proposed development. See Attachment D 5. The proposed use shall otherwise be permitted by the underlying future land use category, be compatible with adjacent land uses, will not substantially alter the essential use characteristics of the neighborhood; and shall demonstrate compliance with one or more of the following objectives`. a. The proposed use is permitted in this zoning district as a minimum standard, flexible standard or flexible development use; b. The proposed use would be a significant economic contributor to the City's economic base by diversifying the local economy or by creating jobs; c. The development proposal accommodates the expansion or redevelopment of an existing economic contributor; d. The proposed use provides for the provision of affordable housing; e. The proposed use provides for development or redevelopment in an area that is characterized by other similar development and where a land use plan amendment and rezoning would result in a spot land use or zoning designation; or f. The proposed use provides for the development of a new and /or preservation of a working waterfront use. See Attachment D 6. Flexibility with regard to use, lot width, required setbacks, height and off - street parking are justified based on demonstrated compliance with all of the following design objectives: a. The proposed development will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of the surrounding properties for uses permitted, in this zoning district; b. The proposed development complies with applicable design guidelines adopted by the City; c. The design, scale and intensity of the proposed development supports the established or emerging character of an area; d.. In order to form a cohesive, visually interesting and attractive appearance, the proposed development incorporates a substantial number of the following design elements: p Changes in horizontal building planes; ❑ Use of architectural details such as columns, cornices, stringcourses, pilasters, porticos, balconies, railings, awnings, etc.; ❑ Variety in materials, colors and textures; ❑ Distinctive fenestration patterns; ❑ Building stepbacks;'and ❑ Distinctive roofs forms. e. The proposed development provides for appropriate buffers, enhanced landscape design and appropriate distances4M jngs. See Attachment D HA 6 I:\Frenchy's\Permits \City of Clearwater\Comprehensive Infill Project (FLD).2008 07-1 1 AG OF CLEARWAISR' E. STORMWATER PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteria Manual and 4- 202.A.21) A STORMWATER NARRATIVE MUST BE SUBMITTED WITH ALL APPLICATIONS. All applications that involve addition or modification of impervious surface, including buildings, must include a stormwater plan that demonstrates compliance with the City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteria manual. A reduction in impervious surface area does not qualify as an exemption to this requirement. ❑ If a plan is not required, the narrative shall provide an explanation as to why the site is exempt. . ❑ At a minimum, the STORMWATER PLAN shall include the following; ❑ Existing topography extending 50 feet beyond all property lines; ❑. Proposed grading including finished floor elevations of all structures; ❑ All adjacent streets and municipal storm systems; ❑ Proposed stormwater detention /retention area including top of bank, toe of slope and outlet control structure; • A narrative describing the proposed stormwater control plan including all calculations and data necessary to demonstrate compliance with the City manual. • Proposed stormwater detention /retention area including top of bank, toe of slope and outlet control structure; • Signature and seal of Florida Registered Professional Engineer on all plans and calculations. } ❑ COPY O PERMIT INQUIRY LETTER OR SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT (SWFWMD) PERMIT SUBMI AL (SWFWMD approval is required prior to issuance of City Building Permit), if applicable ACKN LEDGEMENT OF STORMWATER PLAN REQUIREMENTS (Applicant must initial one of the following): Stormwater plan as noted above is included Stormwater plan is not required and explanation narrative is attached. At a minimum, a grading plan and finished floor elevations shall be provided. CAUTION — IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A STORMWATER PLAN AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 562 -4750. F. SUPPLEMENTAL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 4- 202.A) SIGNED AND SEALED SURVEY (including legal description of property) — One original and 14 copies; TREE SURVEY (including existing trees on site and within 25' of the adjacent site, by species, size (DBH 4" or greater), and location, including drip lines and indicating trees to be removed) — please design around the existing trees; ❑ TREE INVENTORY; prepared by a "certified arborist ", of all trees 4" DBH or greater, reflecting size, canopy (drip lines) and condition of such trees; LOCATION MAP OF THE PROPERTY; PARKING DEMAND STUDY in conjunction with a request to make deviations to the parking standards (ie. Reduce number of spaces). Prior to the submittal of this application, the methodology of such study shall be approved by the Community Development Coordinator and shall be in accordance with accepted traffic engineering principles. The findings of the study will be used in determining whether or not deviations to the parking standards are approved; GRADING. PLAN, as applicable; ❑ PRELIMINARY PLAT, as required (Note: Building permits will not be issued until evidence of recording a final plat is provided); ❑ COPY OF RECORDED PLAT, as applicable; ORIGINAL RKWED LIAR 18 2009 I: \Frenchy's\Permits \City of Clearwater\C.. o_ m_ prehensive Infll Project (FLD) 2008 VAN1A,0 .6 WWWT C ° OF CLEAR A, • G. SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4- 202.A) SITE PLAN with the following information (not to exceed 24"x 36 "): Index sheet referencing individual sheets Included In package; North arrow; Engineering bar scale (minimum scale one inch equals 50 feet), and date prepared; All dimensions; Footprint and size of all EXISTING buildings and structures; Footprint and size of all PROPOSED buildings and structures; All required setbacks; All existing and proposed points of access; All required sight triangles; Identification of environmentally unique areas, such as watercourses, wetlands, tree masses, and specimen trees, including' description and location of understory, ground cover vegetation and wildlife habitats, etc; Location of all public and private easements; Location of all street rights -of -way within and adjacent to the site; Location of existing public and private utilities, including fire hydrants, storm and sanitary sewer lines, manholes and lift stations, gas and water lines; All parking spaces, driveways, loading areas and vehicular use areas; Depiction by shading or crosshatching of all required parking lot interior landscaped areas; Location of all solid waste containers, recycling or trash handling areas and outside mechanical equipment and all required screening (per Section 3- 201(D)(i) and Index #701); Location of all landscape material; Location of all onsite and offsite storm -water management facilities; Location of all outdoor lighting fixtures; Location of all existing and proposed sidewalks; and Floor plan typicals of buildings for all Level Two approvals. A floor plan of each floor is required for any parking garage requiring a — Level Two approval. SITE DATA TABLE for existing, required, and proposed development, in written/tabular form: EXISTING REQUIRED PROPOSED Land area in square feet and acres; 6,603; 0.15 10,000; 0.23 6,603; 0.15 Number of EXISTING dwelling units; 0 - - Number of PROPOSED dwelling units; - - 0 Gross floor area devoted to each use; 2071 restaurant 2299 restaurant 647 deck 750 deck Parking spaces: total number, presented' in tabular form with the 0 code comp. number of required spaces; 39 5 Total paved area, including all paved parking spaces & driveways, 4421(67%) 6273(95%) 4560(69%)- expressed in square feet & percentage of the paved vehicular area; Official records book and page numbers of all existing utility easement; Building and structure heights; 13.0 ft above BFE 13.0 25 FT BFE ft above FE Impermeable surface ratio (I.S.R.); and 0.90 0.96 Floor area ratio (F.A.R.) for all nonresidential uses. 0.32 0.35 REDUCED COLOR SITE PLAN to scale (8'/2 X 11); •O FOR DEVELOPMENTS OVER ONE ACRE, provide the following additional information on site plan: One -foot contours or spot elevations on site; Offsite elevations if required to evaluate the proposed storrnwater management for the parcel; All open space areas; Location of all earth or water retaining walls and earth berms; — Lot lines and building lines (dimensioned); R® Streets and drives (dimensioned); 3 �oQ9 Building i' iAR and structural setbacks (dimensioned); Structural overhangs; PLAN; p ' x WT I-\Frenrhv'clPermits\City of rlwarwntaArmmnrehensive Infill Pmiert /Fl 111 2008 071-1Tdnc H. LANDSCAPING PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4- 1102.A) LANDSCAPE PLAN with the following information (not to exceed 24" x 36 "): All existing and proposed structures; Names of abutting streets; Drainage and retention areas including swales, side slopes and bottom elevations; Delineation and dimensions of all required perimeter landscape buffers; Sight visibility triangles; Delineation and dimensions of all parking areas including landscaping islands and curbing; Existing trees on -site and immediately adjacent to the site, by species, size and locations, including driplines (as indicated on required tree survey); Location, size, and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, indicated by a key relating to the plant schedule; Plant schedule with a key (symbol or label) indicating the size, description, specifications, quantities, and spacing requirements of all existing and proposed landscape materials, including botanical and common names; Typical planting details for trees, palms, shrubs and ground cover plants including instructions, soil mixes, backfilling, mulching and _ protective measures; Interior landscaping areas hatched and /or shaded and labeled and interior landscape coverage, expressing in both square feet and percentage covered; Conditions of a previous development approval (e.g. conditions imposed by the Community Development Board); Irrigation notes. � A REDUCED COLOR LANDSCAPE PLAN to scale (8' /z X 11); ❑ COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM application, as applicable. Landscape associated with the Comprehensive Landscape Program shall exceed minimum Code requirements to offset the areas where minimum Code will not be met. 1. BUILDING ELEVATION PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4- 202.A.23) BUILDING ELEVATION DRAWINGS —with the following information: All sides of all buildings Dimensioned Colors (provide one full sized set of colored elevations) Materials AREDUCED BUILDING ELEVATIONS — same as above to scale on 8'/Y X 11 J. SIGNAGE: (Division 19. SIGNS / Section 3 -1806) N • All EXISTING freestanding and attached signs; Provide photographs and dimensions (area, height, etc.), indicate whether they will be removed or to remain. • All PROPOSED freestanding and attached signs; Provide details including location, size, height, colors, materials and drawing; freestanding signs shall include the street address (numerals) ❑ Comprehensive Sign Program application, as applicable (separate application and fee required). ❑ Reduced signage proposal (8 % X 11) (color), if submitting Comprehensive Sign Program application. ORIGIM L\Frenchy's\Permits \City of Clearwater\Comprehensive Infill Project (FLD) 2008 07 -1 E ® i,,IAR 18 2009 F "W T K. TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY: (Section 4- 202.A.13 and 4- 801.C) • Ll Include if required by the Traffic Operations Manager or his /her designee or if the proposed development: ■ Will degrade the acceptable level of service for any roadway as adopted in the Comprehensive Plan. ■ Will generate 100 or more new vehicle directional trips per hour and /or 1000 or more new vehicle trips per day. ■ Will affect a nearby roadway segment and /or intersection with five (5) reportable accidents within the prior twelve (12) month period or that is on the City's annual list of most hazardous intersections. Trip generation shall be based on the most recent edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineer's (ITE) Trip General Manual. The Traffic Impact Study must be prepared in accordance with a "Scoping Meeting" held with the Traffic Operations Manager and the Planning Department's Development Review Manager or their designee (727 - 562 -4750) Refer to Section 4 -801 C of the Community Development Code for exceptions to this requirement. 0 Acknowledgement of traffic impact study requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following): Traffic Impact Study is included. The study must include a summary table of pre- and post - development levels of service for all roadway legs and each turning movement at all intersections identified in the Scoping Meeting. Traffic Impact Study is not required. CAUTION — IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 562- 4750. L. FIRE FLOW CALCULATIONS/ WATER STUDY: Provide Fire Flow Calculations. Water Study by a FIRE PROTECTION ENGINEER to assure an adequate water supply is available and to determine if any upgrades are required by the developer due to the impact of this project. The water supply must be able to support the needs of any required fire sprinkler, standpipe and /or fire pump. If a fire pump is required the water supply must be able to supply 150% of its rated capacity. Compliance with the 2004 Florida Fire Prevention Code to include NFPA 13, MFPA 14, NFPA 20, NFPA 291, and MFPA 1142 (Annex H) is required. L3 Acknowledgement of fire flow calculations/water study requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following): Fire Flow Calculations/Water Study is included. Fire Flow Calculations/Water Study is not required. CAUTION — IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A FIRE FLOW CALCULATIONS/ WATER STUDY AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Fire Prevention Department at (727) 562 -4334. M. SIGNATURE: I, the undersigned, acknowledge that all representations made in this application are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge and authorize City representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application. 1P 'STATE OrF2IDA`00Cr00U0*N*TY OF PINELLAS Sworn to and subscribed before me this day of A.D. 20 to me and /or by who is personally known has produced as identification. Janet Baustert, Vice President Signature of property owner or representative Notary public, RErF® My commission expires: i, AR 18 200Q PLANNWC r . A V C: \Documents and Settings \derek.ferguson \Desktop \planningforms_0707 \Comprehensive Infill P NW, Page 7 of 8 i • N. 1. AFFIDAVIT TO AUTHORIZE AGENT: Provide names of all property owners on deed — PRINT full names: Michael Preston, President ffA 2. That (I am /we are) the owner(s) and record title holder(s) of the following described property (address or general location): 351 S. Gulfview Blvd., Clearwater, FL 33767 3. That this property constitutes the property for which a request for a: (describe request) Site Upgrade 4. That the undersigned (has /have) appointed and (does /do) appoint: Janet Baustert, Vice President as (his /their) agent(s) to execute any petitions or other documents necessary to affect such petition; 5. That this affidavit has been executed to induce the City of Clearwater, Florida to consider and act on the above described property; 6. That site visits to the property are necessary by City representatives in order to process this application and the owner authorizes City representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application; 7. That (1 /we), the undersigned authority, hereby certify that the foregoing is true and correct. Michael Preston, President Property Owner Property Owner Property Owner Property Owner STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS Before me the undersigned, an officer duly commissioned by the laws of the State of Florida, on this day of , personally appeared who having been first duly swom Deposes and says that he /she fully understands the contents of the affidavit that he /she signed. Notary Public Signature Notary Seal /Stamp My Commission Expires: C: \Documents and Settings \derek.ferguson \Desktop \planningforms -0707 \Comprehensive Infill Page 8 of 8 ORIGINA RRI® X009 AT ATTACHMENT "A" LEGAL DESCRIPTION BEGINNING AT A POINT 190.00 FEET WEST AND 25.00 FEET NORTH OF THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE SOUTH 1/2 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 6, TOWNSHIP 29 SOUTH, RANGE 19 EAST, HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY, FLORIDA FOR A POINT OF BEGINNING: THENCE RUN WEST 90.00 FEET ALONG THE NORTH BOUNDARY LINE OF OSBORNE AVENUE; THENCE RUN NORTH- 150.00 FEET; THENCE RUN WEST 355.00 FEET; THENCE RUN SOUTH 150.00 FEET TO THE NORTH BOUNDARY LINE OF OSBORNE AVENUE; THENCE WEST 25.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 305.00 FEET; THENCE EAST 470.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 305.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. ORIGINAL RECEIVED NAR 18 2009 PLANWVr, at CRY OF CLEARWA, t I A • Attachment B Description of Requests • Additional 228 SF of enclosed restaurant space along with a 103 SF outdoor deck expansion. • Reduction of front (west) building setback to South Gulfview from 15.0 feet to 0.00 feet. • Reduction of front (west) pavement setback to South Gulfview from 15.0 feet to 0.00 feet. • Reduction of side (south) building setback from 10.0 feet to 5.00 feet. • Reduction of side (south) pavement setback from 10.0 feet to 0.00 feet. • Reduction of side (north) pavement setback from 10.0 feet to 5.00 feet. • Reduction of rear (east) pavement setback from 20.0 feet to 0.00 feet. • Reduction of parking provided from 39 spaces to 5 spaces. • Reduction in minimum lot width from 100 feet to 60 feet. • Reduction in minimum lot area from 10,000 SF to 6,603 SF. ORIGINAL RpCF.IVED MAR 18 2009 P@AEQ�4 CRY OF CLEARWA • 0 Attachment C General Applicability Criteria 1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. West: The property to the west includes South Gulfview Boulevard and the Beach Walk improvements. North: The property to the north is an existing McDonald's restaurant. East: The property to the east includes an existing one story restaurant. South: The property to the south includes a three story motel. The scale, bulk, coverage and density of the proposed project are in keeping with the Design Guidelines set forth in Beach by Design for the Beach Walk district. The Beach Walk district is the primary beachfront destination on Clearwater Beach. The area is oriented toward tourist overnight accommodations, retail and restaurants. Due to the small size of the building and development lot, the existing restaurant is proposing a small expansion in order to provide code compliant restrooms and access. The scale and bulk of the restaurant is similar to the adjacent McDonald's restaurant with the building taking up a large portion of the site. The character of the building defines Clearwater Beach with a tropical motif and outdoor covered eating opportunities provided by all the Frenchy's restaurant locations. 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. The small expansion of 228 SF will have a very minor impact on the proposes site and almost no noticeable impact on the surrounding properties. The existing parking lot is being expanded slightly with the use of pervious turf block to provide five code compliance spaces, including one handicapped space. The proposed building expansion is located along the south property line, adjacent to the back of an existing motel. The front deck expansion is adjacent Beach Walk improvements. 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use. The proposed development with significantly improve the health and safety of restaurant patrons by providing code compliant restrooms, accel5R? parking spaces. RECEIVED f�A 18 2009 PLANINW,g I- &4T CRY OF MAMA 0 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. The existing restaurant provides six sub - standard parking spaces in the rear of the restaurant site that are difficult to access and maneuver dueu to inadequate driveway isle width. The proposed development will provide five code compliant spaces that are accessible by a 24 foot wide isle that provides adequate backup and turn movements. The parking lot improvements will make the on -site parking lot useable by the patrons of the restaurant. 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity proposed for development. The existing restaurant and proposed addition provide a tropical beach atmosphere accessible by pedestrians from the improved Beach Walk. The restaurant also provides a service consistent with the Beach Walk district. 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts on adjacent properties. The restaurant is located in the center of the tourist area within the Beach Walk district that promotes an active, robust and vibrant area to provide tourists with entertainment, services and food services. The hours of operation include lunch service to night time bar service. ORIGINAL RECEIVED MAR 13 2009 Y Of CLEARWASP ATTACHMENT D FLEXIBILITY CRITERIA FOR COMPREHENSIVE INFILL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECTS 1. The development or redevelopment is otherwise impractical without deviations from the use and/or development standards set forth in this zoning district; The redevelopment of the existing restaurant incorporates the existing building and pavement areas that currently are deviations from code. The proposed building improvements provide code compliant restrooms and handicapped access which require reductions in side setbacks. The front deck expansion will facilitate additional covered outdoor seating area adjacent to the Beach Walk improvements in place of a small planting area separating the seating area from the public walkway. Due to the small size of the parcel, there is limited space to provide code compliance improvements and expand the existing seating deck. The site improvements provide code compliant parking spaces by reducing the rear setback with pervious turf block as an alternate parking lot surface. The remainders of the deviations are including site area and width that are existing conditions that cannot be changed. 2. The development or redevelopment will be consistent with the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan, as well as with the general purpose, intent and basic planning objectives of this Code, and with the intent and purpose of this zoning district; The redevelopment of this project maintains the tropical beach restaurant and provides upgrades to facilities, access and customer space. The use is consistent with the Beach Walk district by providing a tourist restaurant with a tropical theme. 3. The development or redevelopment will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of surrounding properties. The small building expansion and site improvements does not impede on future improvement of surrounding properties. The rear setback reduction from proposed parking is mitigated by the use of pervious turf blocks. The building is well below height restrictions and access remains unchanged. 4. Adjoining properties will not suffer substantial detriment as a result of the proposed development. The proposed development is very minor in scope and does not change the character of the existing parcel or impede upon surrounding properties. Building height shadow patterns remain the same, and property use does not change. The increase in building area is for the expansion of code compliant bathrooms and does not increase traffic to site. 5. The proposed use shall otherwise be permitted by the underlying future land use category, be compatible with adjacent land uses, will not substantially ORSGI RECENED 1;3 2009 pLANKMO IT Cl r)F CLF RSA :7 alter the essential use characteristics of the neighborhood; and shall demonstrate compliance with one or more of the following objectives: The use of restaurant is permitted by the underlying future land use category and is compatible with the surrounding tourist oriented businesses within the Beach Walk District. The use of the project remains the same. a) The proposed use is permitted in this zoning district as a minimum standard, flexible standard or flexible development use; The restaurant use is permitted in the tourist district as a flexible standard and flexible development use. 6. Flexibility with regard to use, lot width, required setbacks, height and off - street parking are justified based on demonstrated compliance with all of the following design objectives: a) The proposed development will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of the surrounding properties for uses permitted in this zoning district; The small building expansion and site improvements does not impede on future improvement of surrounding properties. The rear setback reduction from proposed parking is mitigated by the use of pervious turf blocks. The building is well below height restrictions and access remains unchanged. b) The proposed development complies with applicable design guidelines adopted by the City; a. Density — N/A b. Height — N/A existing building is under 45 -feet tall c. Design, Scale and Mass — Building is less than 5,000 SF and less than 100 foot wide. d. Setbacks — The building deck expansion is set back approximately 13 feet from frontage road adjacent.to front setback. e. Street Level Facades — The entire frontage is a transparent covered outdoor seating deck. Deck is being expanded to provide an aesthetically inviting and easily identified entrance. f. Parking Areas — The parking is being redesigned to be code compliant and is located in the rear of the site, away from the public right of way. g. Signage — The existing signage creates a tropical beach character and is attached to the existing building. h. Sidewalks — The proposed deck will be adjacent to the recently constructed Beach Walk improvements that have incorporated various palm trees into the landscaping. C9� ®� NIT- A'4r �� • i. Street Furniture and Bicycle Racks - The site is located within the Beach Walk district that incorporates significant street furniture and bicycle racks as part of the public right of way improvements. j. Street Lighting — No additional lighting is proposed however the surrounding Beach Walk district provides significant themed lighting. k. Materials and Colors — Color elevations are attached that show proposed fagade colors. c) The design, scale and intensity of the proposed development supports the established or emerging character of an area; The tropical beach design is consistent with the Beach Walk tourist area. The small scale and intensity of the project provides for a locally owned tourist restaurant that embodies the atmosphere contemplated by Beach by Design. d) In order to form a cohesive, visually interesting and attractive appearance, the proposed development incorporates a substantial number of the following design elements: • Changes in horizontal building planes — Changes in horizontal building planes are provided with wooded first floor deck enclosure, covered patio and placement of new awning over deck expansion. Second floor is stepped back with hip roof constructed with standing seam metal. • Use of architectural details such as columns, cornices, stringcourses, pilasters, porticos, balconies, railings, awnings, etc — A new railing and awning will be incorporated into the deck expansion along the site frontage. The building expansion incorporates a new railing and standing seam metal roof. • Variety in materials, colors and textures — The project incorporates a variety of materials, colors and textures included in the existing building such as a standing seam metal roof, blue canvas awning, wood tone lap siding and painted trim. • Distinctive fenestration patterns — The expanded decking and existing covered decking allows for the passage of air flow and customers from the Beach Walk improvements west of the property. The covered decking allows the use of natural lighting. The second floor front elevation incorporates seven continuous windows for air flow and natural lighting. • Building stepbacks — The existing second floor is set back from the first floor decking along the building frontage. • Distinctive roof forms — The proposed expansion incorporates an upgraded standing seam metal roof to provide a tropical atmosphere and reflect heat away from the building and back into the atmosphere. a- � .'�< CV �LU 00 U- 0 r 0 — • • e) The proposed development provides for appropriate buffers, enhanced landscape design and appropriate distance between buildings. The one existing building is setback enough to provide for access to a rear parking lot, and to provide areas for landscape buffering with native sea grape material along the side buffers. The parking lot expansion to the rear property line is mitigated by the use of pervious turf block to minimize stormwater runoff. The front setback is reduced to provide for additional restaurant decking and enhanced entrance to the Beach Walk pedestrian trail. ® ® s LU 0 � FRENCHY'S SOUTHBEACH STORMWATER NARRATIVE The existing site currently does not have a stormwater management system. The existing runoff sheetf lows from the site to the frontage road west of the property. The proposed improvements include the 228 SF expansion of the existing building and addition of wood decking. Due to the small increase in building area, we intend on applying for a Noticed General SWFWMD Permit with best management practices. No additional stormwater pond is proposed on -site s, 2'V GO ¢' z o zs, KERN F. DE BLAO, MR MT !a So BELLAS ow, FL( lm 703966 12-31-2002 16:13:59 IMP 51 DERIWAR POTOR TR PREPARED BY AND RETURN TO: 01%43 J. Paul Raymond,' Esquire IR :0240%75 BK:1244 WG:2% EP$:1259 Macfarlane Ferguson &McMullen IBO 002 PAO 1 $10.50 DOC STAMP 625 Court Street, Suite 200 -1D(219 3 X6,475.00 Post Office- Box 1669 (33757) TOTAL: $6,4„50 Clearwater, Florida 33756 DEC( (; $6,485.50 By _il�� 5.00 A4•�; -_ GR� i �/ WARRANT]C i3$ED - L+�+"-[ 02- 489675 DEC - 31-2002 4:12pM ;! F.S. fi89 . 02 p INELLRS C0 BK 12446 PG 1256 FEES _._�.. - P,!- THIS INDENTURE made this 2,7ce day of December, 2002, by and RrV �> TC`f ' between JULIE F. NICHOLS.,f'rk /a- O'ulie Fletcher ;Tiernaa, a married - person, of the County of',.dharlbtte, in the- State of Florida, Party of the First Part, and•'- kVJMMEL G. PRESTON, AS TRUSTEE OF THE AMENDED AND RESTA:Tip :RE{10CABLE TRUST AGREEMENT OF MICHAEL G. PRESTON DATED JU�'3;•.1998,with full power and authority either to, s protect, conserve.'aiid to sell, lease, encumber, or otherwise dispose of the ear. property described herein, Party of the Second Part, whose.inailing address is 419 Eastshore Drive, Clearwater, Fl.: 33767. W I T N E S S E T H the said Party of the First Part, for and in consider -, _ abaor� of'the sum of Ten..Dollars ($10.00) to them in hand paid by the, -gia d Party of the_ Second. Part, the receipt whereof is. hereby - -_ acknowledged, has granted, bargained and sold to the said Party of the Second _Part, their heirs and assigns forever, the following described land, situate lying and being in the County of Pinellas,' State of Florida, to -wit.: Lot 70, LLOYD- o98ITE- SKINNER SUBDIVISION, according to the map or plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 13, Page 12, Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida. Subject to 2003 real estate taxes, restrictions, reservations, and easements of record. THIS IS 'NOT THE HOMESTEAD OF THE PARTY OF THE FIRST PART. Parcel-I.D. No.07/29/15/52390/000/0700 OP /GINAL RECEIVED 1 2009 PIANNWG pYT CRY OF CL WA,10� �a Q�P I COUNTY Q REC BK 12 S pr, 81257 And the said Party of the First Part,•aloes`hereby fully warrant the, title to sa.'id land, and will defe nth 'the same against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever,,;- IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the 'eaici;Party of the First Part has, hereunto set their hands and seal the day and year first above written. Signed, Sealed and Deliver— in Our n ' (SEAL) P nt Name T ,qn!`•'s .moo JULIE F. NICHOLS _ Rriht Name AAr` elj Witness:; - STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY . OR,.....P/ N P: L. L.,Al `. iEREBY CERTIFY, that on this day personally appeared before . me,.,vle an officer duly authorized to administer oaths and take: ackno°tdgments, JULIE F. NICHOLS, to me personally known and who did take an oath, and known to me to be the individual described in and who executed the foregoing instrument and she acknowledged: before the that she executed the same for the purposes therein'. expressed. WITNESS my hand and off ' cial seal at said, County and State, this ,.?T-clay of December, 2002. Notary P is Print Name My Commission Expires: . drc J PaW RaymaM .Y My Cw#Wssion D013=6 �"a � Exphes August 10, 2008 -2- ORIGINAL RECEIVED AR 181009 PA C R' 6F CL F,ARVfA r PLANNING DEPARTMENT 0 CITY OF CLEARWATER POST OFFICE BOX 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758 -4748 MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562 -4567 FAx (727) 5624865 April 21, 2009 Mrs. Janet Baustert Frenchy's South Beach, Inc. 419 Eastshore Drive Clearwater, Florida 33767 Re: FLD2008 -04009 — 351 South Gulfview Boulevard Dear Mrs. Baustert: This letter constitutes a Development Order pursuant to Community Development Code (CDC) Section 4- 206.D.6. On April 21, 2009, the Community Development Board (CDB) reviewed your Flexible Development application to permit a 228 square foot building addition and a 1,033 square foot deck expansion for an existing restaurant within the Tourist (T) District with a front (west) setback of zero feet (to building), a side (south) setback of zero feet (to building/pavement), a side (north) setback of 15.91 feet (to building) and 5 feet (to pavement), and a rear (east) setback of 42 feet (to building) and zero feet (to pavement); a building height of 22 feet; and 5 off - street parking spaces as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Community Development Code Section 2- 803.C; and a reduction to the required foundation landscaping along South Gulfview Boulevard from five to zero feet as part of a Comprehensive Landscape Program, under the provisions of Community Development Code Section 3- 1202.G. The CDB APPROVED the application with conditions based upon the following findings of fact and conclusions of law, subject to the conditions. Findings of Fact: 1. That the 0.15 -acre subject property is located on the east side of South Gulfview Boulevard, approximately 60 feet north of Fifth Street; 2. That the subject property is located within the Tourist (T) District and the Resort Facilities High (RFH) Future Land Use Plan category; 3. That the subject property is located within the special area redevelopment plan, Beach by Design, as part of the "Beach Walk" district; 4. That the existing development is presently nonconforming with respect to both minimum setback and off - street parking requirements; and 5. That the proposal consists of a 228 square foot restroom addition for an existing restaurant as well as minor expansions to the existing wood deck and the reconfiguration of the off - street parking area to meet dimensional requirements. Conclusions of Law: 1. That the development proposal has been found to be in compliance with the applicable Standards and Criteria as per CDC Sections 2 -801.1 and 2 -803; 2. That the development proposal has been found to be in compliance with the Flexibility criteria for a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project as per CDC Section 2- 803.C; 3. That the development proposal has been found to be in compliance with the General Standards for Level Two Approvals as per CDC Section 3- 913.A; and 4. That the development proposal has been found to be in compliance with the Comprehensive Landscape Program criteria as per CDC Section 3- 1202.G. 1% u A...... F..... ..... A.................. A.r -, A.- .,.._J� April 21, 2009 0 0 FLD2008 -04009 — 351 South Gulfview Boulevard Page 2 of 2 Conditions of Approval: 1. That prior to the issuance of any building permits, any outstanding comments of the Engineering Department shall be addressed; 2. That prior to the issuance of any building permits, any outstanding comments of the Fire Department shall be addressed; 3. That the Legal Description set forth on the Cover Sheet be revised to reflect the correct property; 4. That the General Site Notes set forth on the Site, Grading and Drainage Plan be revised to reflect the correct architect of record ( #3) and the correct total square footage and parking requirement ( #17), as well as striking note #14 and #16; 5. That a prior permit (BCP1999 -12578 or BCP2003- 02560) be reactivated or a new permit be applied for so that the previously constructed restroom addition, deck and 267 square foot second floor addition as previously approved under FLS 00- 01 -01, may be inspected and completed; and 6. That the final design and color of the building shall be consistent with the architectural elevations approved by the CDB. Pursuant to CDC Section 4 -407, an application for a building permit shall be made within one year of Flexible Development approval (April 21, 2010). All required certificates of occupancy shall be obtained within two years of the date of issuance of the initial building permit. The building permit must be obtained within six months of the initial permit application. This timeframe to obtain the initial building permit may be extended for an additional six months for cause by the Community Development Coordinator. Time frames do not change with successive owners. The Community Development Coordinator may grant an extension of time for the Flexible Development approval for a period not to exceed one year and only within the original period of validity. The Community Development Board may approve one additional extension of time for the Flexible Development approval after the Community Development Coordinator's extension to initiate a building permit application. The issuance of this Development Order does not relieve you of the necessity to obtain any building permits or pay any impact fees that may be required. — order to fac�l.tate the issuance of any permit or license afl� . by this approval, please bring a copy of this letter with you when applying for any permits or licenses that require this prior development approval. Additionally, an appeal of a Level Two approval (Flexible Development) may be initiated pursuant to CDC Section 4 -502.B by the applicant or by any person granted party status within 14 days of the date of the CDB meeting. The filing of an application/notice of appeal shall stay the effect of the decision pending the final determination of the case. The appeal period for your case expires on May 5, 2009 (14 days from the date of the CDB meeting). Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact Robert G. Tefft, Development Review Manager, at (727) 562 -4539 or via e -mail at robert .tefft @).myclearwater.com. Sincerely, Michael Delk, AICP Planning Director S: (Planning DepartmentlC D BIFLEX (FLD)Ilnactive or Finished ApplicationsIGuljview S 0351 Frenchy's (7) 2009.04 - Approved - R71Development Order 2009 04- 21.doc r Keith Zayac & Associates, Inc. 0 701 Enterprise Road E., Ste 404 Civil Engineering, Landscape Architecture, Planning Safety Harbor, FL 34695 (727) 793 -9888 Phone (727) 793 -9855 Fax keith@keithzayac.com MEMORANDUM TO: City of Clearwater FROM: Keith E. Zayac, P.E., RLA, LEED AP DATE: April 6, 2009 RE: Frenchy's South Beach The following is a summary of impervious /pervious calculations for the proposed development of the project: Total Area: 6603.14 SF Building Area (including front deck: 1787.00 SF Pavement 4560.00 SF Total Impervious Area 6251.00 SF (0.95 ISR) Open Space (including wood ramp over sand) 352.14 SF r 0 Tefft, Robert From: Shoberg, Elliot E. Sent: Monday, April 06, 2009 4:21 PM To: Tefft, Robert; 'Keith Zayac' Subject: RE: Frenchy's South Beach I s image001.gif Yes, it's fine with us, - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Tefft, Robert Sent: Mon 4/6/2009 2:49 PM To: 'Keith Zayac'; Shoberg, Elliot E. Subject: RE: Frenchy's South Beach Elliot: Is this acceptable to Engineering? Robert G. Tefft Development Review Manager City of Clearwater Planning Department Phone: (727) 562 -4539 1 Fax: (727) 562 -4865 - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Keith Zayac [mai Ito: keith @keithzayac.com] Sent: Monday, April 06, 2009 1:02 PM To: Tefft, Robert; Shoberg, Elliot E. Subject: Frenchy's South Beach The attached are the impervious/ pervious calculations for the project as requested. Keith E. Zayac, PE, RLA, LEED AP President Keith Zayac & Associates, Inc. (727)793 -9888 phone (727)793 -9855 fax Keith-Business-Card V, • Keith Zayac & Associates, Inc. Civil Engineering, Landscape Architecture, Planning March 3, 2009 City of Clearwater 100 S. Myrtle Street Clearwater, FL 33756 RE: FLD2008 2 40 0 -- `351 GULFVIEW BLVD Vim, I 701 S. Enterprise Road E., Ste 404 Safety Harbor, FL 34695 (727) 793 -9888 Phone (727) 793 -9855 Fax Keith @keithzayac.com ORIGINAL RK-FNED► NAR 18 2009 C MY OF CLEARIVAft AMT Please find attached the following in response to comments generated by the City from the review of the above - mentioned project: • Flexible Development Application for Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, • Warranty Deed, • Color Photographs of existing site, • Civil Construction drawings (full size), • Civil Construction drawings (8 %2" x 11 "), • Boundary, Tree, and Topographical Survey, • Architectural Building Elevation Drawings (full size), • Architectural Building Elevation drawings (8 %" x 11 "), • Parking Demand Study. In addition, we have addressed the City's specific comments individually below. Prior to review by the Community Development Board 1. Regarding the parking study, this application proposes the deletion of existing parking spaces and no request that an additional 4 to 9 parking spaces not be provided for a 548 sq. ft. restaurant expansion. This will result in a 10-15 parking space demand on the public parking system. According to the parking study no parking is available in the two studied parking lots 325 and 33 between the hours of 12 noon and 4pm. where will employees and customers park during there hours. a. Please see the attached parking analysis. Based on the DRC meeting on May 1, 2008 and subsequent parking meeting with Public Works, Traffic Operations and Parking System on June 9, 2008 the parking analysis has been revised. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy 1. Applicants shall submit 5 sets of as -built drawings that are signed and sealed by a professional registered in the State of Florida. The Construction Services inspector will field inspect as -built drawings for accuracy. • a. Acknowledged. Five (5) sets of signed and sealed As -Built surveys will be provided upon completion of construction, prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. General Note: DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review: additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit application. Parking System Comments 1. Where will employees and customers park / The City's public parking inventory is very limited in this area of Clearwater Beach and there is not sufficient public parking available to replace the parking spaces required for this use. a. Please see the attached parking analysis. Based on the DRC meeting on May 1, 2008 and subsequent parking meeting with Public Works, Traffic Operations and Parking System on June 9, 2008 the parking analysis has been revised. 2. Parking Study: Temp. Lot # 62 -5 and # 62 -N should not be considered as they are temporary and leased on month to month basis. Additionally, date for lot #62 -N does not indicate the lot closes @ sunset. a. Please see the attached parking analysis. Based on the DRC meeting on May 1, 2008 and subsequent parking meeting with Public Works, Traffic Operations and Parking System on June 9, 2008 the parking analysis has been revised. 3. Parking study: Section III — sat 4/S" this is attributable to the spring break atmosphere. During most of the seasonal weekends (Feb -Sept) Holidays and special events, parking demand is identical or close to spring break conditions and should be considered more of a normal condition. a. Please see the attached parking analysis. Based on the DRC meeting on May 1, 2008 and subsequent parking meeting with Public Works, Traffic Operations and Parking System on June 9, 2008 the parking analysis has been revised. 4. Parking study: Table I and table 2 indicate the on -site Frenchey's parking is never 100% why? Where is staffparking now and are the spaces open and available to the public? a. Please see the attached parking analysis. Based on the DRC meeting on May 1, 2008 and subsequent parking meeting with Public Works, Traffic Operations and Parking System on June 9, 2008 the parking analysis has been revised. S. Parking Study: IV Future Conditions. The 94 temp parking spaces recently added to the old Adams Mark site should not be a consideration as the term of the lease is only through 9108 and then month to month. a. Please see the attached parking analysis. Based on the DRC meeting on May 1, 2008 and subsequent parking meeting with Public Works, Traffic Operations and Parking System on June 9, 2008 the parking analysis has been revised. Landscaping 1. Pursuant to community development code (CDC) section 3- 1202.B.I palms can be used to satisfy 75% of tree requirements on the beach. The landscape plans proposes palms to satisfy 100% of the tree requirement. a. Two oak trees have been added along the rear property line in addition to 10 palm trees. „1 _C" 5 Uj ® - LL. 0 ML • • 2. Pursuant to CDC Section 3 -1204 D all landscaping must be protected from vehicular traffic by the installation of curbing along the perimeter of any landscaping which adjoins vehicular use areas. a. Existing landscape timbers lined along the northern drive aisle protect existing and proposed vegetation. The rear parking area parking stalls currently have wheel stops protecting the perimeter landscaping as well. There are no proposed infrastructure improvements at this time. 3. The landscape plan does not appear to depict the landscaping for the entire property (see north property line) Revise the plan to depict all existing /proposed landscaping. Further as per CDC Section 2 -803. C. 6 e in order to form a cohesive, visually interesting and attractive appearance the proposed development shall provide for enhanced landscape design. Thus, it may be beneficial in achieving compliance with this criterion for the existing landscaping along the north property line to be upgraded consistent with Code requirements. a. The landscape plan depicts the existing hedge along the north property line, existing palm trees, and proposed landscaping. Stormwater The following shall be addressed prior to Community Development Board. 1. Provide water quality and attenuation for the redevelopment area The design shall meet the City criteria. a. City staff has indicated that payment -in -lieu will be required due to existing site constraints. The following shall be addressed at Building Permit Application. 1. Provide a copy of the approved SWFWA1D permit or letter of exemption. a. A copy of the SWFWNID Noticed General Permit or letter of exemption will be forwarded to the City upon issuance, and prior to the release of building permits. Note: additional comments may be forthcoming based on the response to the above conditions. 1. DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. a. Acknowledged. Traffic Engineering 1. Provide required number of handicap parking spaces compliance with Florida Accessibility Code for Building Construction Chapter 11, Section I1 -4.1.2 a. There is an existing handicap parking stall located at the rear of the building adjacent to the proposed ramp leading into the building. The existing stall in is incompliance with Chapter 11, section 11- 4.1.2. 2. Provide handicap parking stall and sign details compliance with city standards. tX era 0 c� oc.�. • • a. The City's standard handicap parking stall and sign details have been added to the plans so that the construction team can update the sign with the appropriate fine and Florida Statue. 3. Provide an accessible path from a building's accessible entrance to a public sidewalk compliant with Florida Accessibility Code for Building Construction Chapter II. Section 11- 4.3.2. a. Please refer to the revised construction plans. The handicap parking space has �°- been proposed with an accessible path along the existing concrete driveway and sidewalk to the existing accessible ramp at the entrance to the restaurant The above to be addressed prior to a Community Development Board (CDB) hearing. Q CE N 1-1 , _ 1. Applicant's shall comply with the current Transportation impactfee ordinances and fee schedule and paid prior to a Certificate of Occupancy (C. O.) ®� a. Acknowledged. 2. DRC review is a prerequisite for building permit review, additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a building permit application. a. Acknowledged. Planning 1. BCP1999- 12578, which added a restroom, deck and 267 square foot second floor addition expired without a certificate of occupancy being issued. BCP2003- 02560, which was to obtain inspections for the aforementioned additions also, expired without a certificate of occupancy being issued. These issues MUST be addressed as part of this approval (permits were associated with FLS 00- 01 -01. a. The referenced permits will be addressed in conjunction with this project prior to building permit. 2. Pursuant to Community Development Code (CDC) section 2 -803. C.1 redevelopment as part of a Comprehensive infill Redevelopment project must otherwise be impractical without deviations from the development standards set forth in the zoning district. While a portion of the site exists with a zero foot side (south) setback, the proposal would enlarge the area where this setback exists. As per the above why must the proposed deck be constructed in the setback and adjacent to the property line? Further, the written response does not address the requested parking deviation. a. Please refer to the attached narrative addressing the application description issues. 3. Pursuant to CDC Section 2 -803. C.2 redevelopment shall be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan as well as the general purpose, intent and basic planning objectives of this Code and with the intent and purpose of the zoning district. The response provided with the application does not address these provisions and further does not address the requested deviations from the code requirements. a. Please refer to the attached narrative addressing the application description issues. 4. Pursuant to CDC Section 2- 803.C.J. the redevelopment will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of surrounding properties. The response • • provided with the application is inaccurate as the proposal does extend on -site development past the currently developed limits. a. Please refer to the attached narrative addressing the application description issues. 5. Pursuant to CDC Section 2 -803. C.4 adjacent properties shall not suffer substantial detriment as a result of the proposed development. How does the location of a stage directly at the south property line not result in the potential detriment to the adjacent property? a. This was previously mislabeled. There is no proposed stage. The deck expansion provides for restroom access and overflow standing room. The neighbors to the south (Ritz Motel) are providing a letter of no objection to the expanded deck. This letter will be forwarded to the City under separate cover. 6 Pursuant to CDC Section 2 -803. C. 6 d, in order to form a cohesive visually interesting and attractive appearance, the proposal incorporates a substantial number of design elements (see elements listed in code) How does the proposal meet this criterion? It would seem as if nothing is proposed to achieve compliance with this required element of the comprehensive infill Redevelopment application. a. The proposed expansion is designed to carry forth the existing beach atmosphere. The appearance is meant to enhance the Beach Walk theme with a casual tropical appearance appealing to tourists and local users. The other Frenchy's restaurant locations along Clearwater Beach provide a similar atmosphere and have been hugely successful. 7. Pursuant to CDC Section 2- 503.C.6 the proposal shall provide for appropriate buffers enhanced landscape design and appropriate distances between buildings. How does the construction of a deck/stage at a zero foot setback from the south property line represent an appropriate distance from the adjacent building? How is an appropriate buffer provided? a. The areas along the south property line currently include a wooden deck and concrete pavement with a zero foot setback and no landscaping. The proposed design proposes the removal of the existing pavement, and replacement with an extension of the wooden deck with handicapped accessible ramp. The property adjacent to the south is the rear of a three story hotel. A concrete wall separates the two properties and provides a visual buffer on the first story. 8. Pursuant to CDC Section 3- 913.A.4 the proposal shall be designed to minimize traffic congestion. The written response provided with the application that "the proposed addition does not increase vehicle trips to the area Does not address the entire proposal, which eliminate the six existing parking spaces that serve the use as if presently exists. How does the creation of a greater parking demand couples with the elimination of existing parking not increase traffic congestion? a. Please see the attached parking analysis. Based on the DRC meeting on May 1, 2008 and subsequent parking meeting with Public Works, Traffic Operations and Parking System on June 9, 2008 the parking analysis has been revised. 9. Pursuant to CDC Section 3- 913.A.6, the design of the proposal shall minimize adverse effects, including visual, acoustic, olfactory and hours of operation impacts on adjacent properties. How will the expansion of the dining area (deck) at a zero - foot setback from the south property line and the addition of a stage also at a zero- V Cn Cw 4 .® UJ 322 CF?. ,J ice. 9 CR c� 0 a 0 • foot set back from the south property line adverse visual, acoustic, olfactory and hours of operation impact upon the adjacent property? a. The proposed deck extension is for restroom access and overflow standing. There is no proposed expansion of dining area or stage. 10. Provide the square footage of the cooler, freezer and the HW pot sink. a. Please refer to the architectural response. These are portable units that will be placed on open -air concrete pads. 11. What is the intended use of the stage? a. There is no proposed stage. Please also refer to the architectural response. 12. The architectural site plan does not depict the rear sidewalks as they have been depicted on the civil plans. a. The architectural and civil plans will continue to be coordinated as design changes and comments are addressed. The two sets of plans will match prior to the issuance of building permits. 13. The architectural and civil site plans call for the existing dock to be extended to the west property line. However, the reduction of the required front setback 10 feet has not been included in the description of request in the application, and the written response to the General Applicability Criteria and the Comprehensive infill Redevelopment Project criteria do not address the requires reduction of the front (west) setback. a. Please refer to the attached narrative addressing the application description issues. 14. The architectural site plan calls for the enlargement of the existing entry by +I-four 0 i feet. First, this is not depicted on the civil plans. Second, provide an exact dimension by which the entry is proposed to be enlarged. Third, provide architectural elevations that depict the change in appearance that this enlargement would bring. a. The civil plans show site related design. The architectural plans show building related design. Please refer to the revised architectural plans and response. 15. Is the proposed deck to be covered? If either case, provide architectural elevations of the entire south elevation of the business. a. Please refer to the architect's response and revised documents. 16 The HW Pot Sink must be counted as part of the proposed new square footage. a. Please refer to the architect's response and revised documents. 17. With the inclusion of the new gate — how will solid waste pick -up occur? a. It should be noted that a gate currently exists — the plans note that the existing gate is being replaced. This can be seen in the previously provided photographs, survey, and construction plans. Solid waste pick -up will continue to be collected in the same manner it does now — via curbside pick -up. The dumpsters are rolled out to the property line for pick-up. 18. The civil plans do not indicate what is to occur with all of the existing turf block parking. Clarify. a. The existing turf block (and (1) one associated parking space) are being removed by the south -east corner of the building. a— a' ..s,a Z 50 • • 19. Provide architectural elevations that clearly depict how the new addition and new /expanded decks and entrance will relate to the existing building. a. Please refer to the architect's response and revised documents. 20. The proposed sliding gate would not appear to provide adequate clearance to allow vehicles to access the rear of the site. a. Since the last submittal the site has been revised so that there is no need for a new fence. The existing fence will suffice for the proposed improvements. 21. What does the proposed sliding gate connect to? According to the survey only a two - foot high concrete wall and the building itself are in the area of the gate. a. There are no proposed improvements in this area and the existing fence will be utilized as is. 22. According to the survey. There is a large area of turf block at the rear of the property that is for the existing parking spaces. The site plan does not propose the removal of all the turf block in conjunction with the elimination of the parking spaces. Revise the site and landscape plans. a. The revised site and landscape plans depict the rear parking area to remain and landscaping will be enhanced. 23. Clark if "Building area" as denoted in the Site Data Table represents the total square footage of the building (firstfloor, second floor, cooler, freezer -which it should) or only the building footprint. a. Please refer to the revised Site Data Table. The areas have been revised for clarity. 24. Parking analysis; section III, Friday, April 4, 2008: Clark whether the low of 48 spaces occurred at IOpm or IOam. a. Please see the attached parking analysis. Based on the DRC meeting on May 1, e- 2008 and subsequent parking meeting with Public Works, Traffic Operations and Parking System on June 9, 2008 the parking analysis has been revised. 25. Pursuant to parking Analysis; Section III; Customer Characteristics: Frenchy's South Beach is expected to experience a similar rate of walk -up customers to Frenchy's Rockaway /Post Pizza "it be —) ZR corner and would appropriate to reduce Frenchy's by 50% the the 0 parking requirement proposal would eliminate parking requirement by 100% which is inconsistent with your customer characteristics. a. Please see the attached parking analysis. Based on the DRC meeting on May 1, 2008 and subsequent parking meeting with Public Works, Traffic Operations and Parking System on June 9, 2008 the parking analysis has been revised. 26 Parking analysis; Section IV, Future Conditions with Expansion: According to a strict interpretation of the code the proposed restaurant would require 32 parking spaces. Not between 15 and 32. Revise. a. Please see the attached parking analysis. Based on the DRC meeting on May 1, 2008 and subsequent parking meeting with Public Works, Traffic Operations and Parking System on June 9, 2008 the parking analysis has been revised. 27. Pursuant to parking analysis, Section IV, future condition with Expansion two existing parking spaces are to be available to satisfy any additional demand created ! • by the restaurant. Two points first the conclusion of this analysis states there will be no additional parking demand. So what additional demand does this section refer to? Second, the site plan proposes no parking spaces. a. Please see the attached parking analysis. Based on the DRC meeting on May 1, 2008 and subsequent parking meeting with Public Works, Traffic Operations and Parking System on June 9, 2008 the parking analysis has been revised. 28. Pursuant to parking analysis; Section ITV Conclusion, Future condition with expansion, other than the hours of 12 noon to 4pm on Saturday there are adequate existing parking spaces to support the expansion. This would seem to indicate that during several peak business hours the proposed reduction in required off-street parking would not be favorable, which is inconsistent with the purpose of this analysis and your request. a. Please see the attached parking analysis. Based on the DRC meeting on May 1, 2008 and subsequent parking meeting with Public Works, Traffic Operations and Parking System on June 9, 2008 the parking analysis has been revised. 29. Pursuant to parking analysis; section Y, conclusion, "the expansion ofFrenchy's South Beach Cafe is not expected to realistically create any additional parking demand due to the customer characteristics" The conclusion states there is an existing parking demand due to the customer characteristics. The conclusion states there is an existing parking demand; however no findings are made to support the elimination of the existing parking for the existing restaurant. As such the analysis fails to juste the reduction in parking for this proposal. a. Please see the attached parking analysis. Based on the DRC meeting on May 1, 2008 and subsequent parking meeting with Public Works, Traffic Operations and Parking System on June 9, 2008 the parking analysis has been revised. 30. The parking analysis is unclear as to whether the estimated 50% walk -up rate for Frenchy's South Beach expected to continue following the construction of the proposed additions. a. Please see the attached parking analysis. Based on the DRC meeting on May 1, 2008 and subsequent parking meeting with Public Works, Traffic Operations (,l and Parking System on June 9, 2008 the parking analysis has been revised. LU 31. The parking analysis compares Frenchy's South Beach to two different businesses the purpose of walk -up traffic comparisons and states that it is similar; however these similar businesses have an 11% disparity between them. Revise the analysis to better state the projected walk -up traffic for the subject use. a. Please see the attached parking analysis. Based on the DRC meeting on May 1, 2008 and subsequent parking meeting with Public Works, Traffic Operations and Parking System on June 9, 2008 the parking analysis has been revised. 32. The description of request in the application as well as the project narrative provided state the building addition as being 560 square feet in size, which is inconsistent with the actual plans. Revise as appropriate. a. Please refer to the revised construction plans; the proposed building addition is only 250 SF. 33. The project narrative submitted with the application states "the project also involves the removal of six (6) unused, substandard parking spaces located behind the building; however photographic evidence also submitted with the application depicts e-- spa the parking as being used. These photographs are not only contrary to the statement made in the narrative, but also contrary to the application itself as its shown that the existing parking is utilized patrons and/or employees of the restaurant and us therefore clearly necessary for the use. a. The previously provided photographs showed one car in the parking lot. The car belongs to the engineer who was on site taking the photographs. Please refer to the revised parking analysis for additional information. Thank you for your time in the review of the above responses and revised documents. If there are any further concerns or additional items are needed, feel free to contact me directly at (727) 793- 9888, ext. 302. ac, P.E., R.L.A., LEED AP & Associates, Inc. Uj 0 C a I 9:30 am Case Number: FLD2008- 0400y�351 S GULFVIEW BLVD Owner(s): Preston, Michael G Tre 419 Eastshore Dr Clearwater, F133767 TELEPHONE: 727 - 449 -2729, Applicant Janet Baustert 419 East Shore Drive 40 FAX: 727 - 446 -0588, E -MAIL: No Email Clearwater, Fl 33767 TELEPHONE: 727 - 449 -2729, FAX: 727 - 446 -0588, E -MAIL: No Email Location: 0.15 acres on east side of Gulfview Boulevard, approximately 60 feet north of Fifth Street Atlas Page: Zoning District: T, Tourist Request: Flexible Development approval for a QP8 uare foot addition to an existing restaurant within the Tourist (T) District with reductions to the frot) setback from 15 feet to zero feet, the side (south) setback from 10 feet to zero feet, the side (north) setback from 10 feet to zero feet, and the rear (east) setback from 20 feet to 4 feet; and to reduce the off - street parking requirement from 32 parking spaces to zero parking spaces as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project pursuant to Community Development Code (CDC) Section 2- 803.C. Proposed Use: Restaurants Neighborhood Clearwater Beach Association Association(s): Clearwater, Fl 33767 Po Box 3295 TELEPHONE: 443 -2168, FAX: No Fax, E -MAIL: papamurphy @aol.com Neighborhood Clearwater Neighborhoods Coalition Association(s): Clearwater, Fl 33763 1821 Springwood Cir S TELEPHONE: No Phone, FAX: No Fax, E -MAIL: No Email Presenter: Robert Tefft, Planner III Attendees Included: bo� � 4, \'J (0/457 iA� �S The DRC reviewed this application with t e follow ng comments: General Engineering: FnP Development Review Agenda - Thursday, August 7, 2008 - Page 5 016-1 f:1 l�F— DRC Am.., Apnd� I.I April 28, 2008 Generngineering condition: •' 1.Regarding the parking study, this application proposes the deletion of 6 existing parking spaces and to request that an additional 4 to 9 parking spaces not be provided for a 548 sq. ft. restaurant expansion. This will result in a 10 - 15 parking space demand on the public parking system. According to the parking study no parking is available in the two studied parking lots 32S and 33 between the hours of 12 noon and 4:00 p.m. Where will employees and customers park during these hours? General Engineering conditions related to the applicant's resubmittal (7 /24/2008) Prior to review by the Community Development Board: 1. The revised parking analysis provided by the applicant agrees that no parking is available in the studied parking lots 32S and 33 between the hours of 12 Noon and 4:00 p.m. and makes no provision for the additional employee and customer parking spaces needed during these hours. The applicant has stated in the resubmittal that the parking analysis was revised in response to questions raised at the May 1, 2008 Development Review Committee meeting and to provide additional information per agreements reached at a June 9 meeting with Traffic Operations and Parking System staff. Describe the agreements and what changes were made to the parking analysis to comply with the agreements. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy: 1. Applicant shall submit 5 sets of as -built drawings that are signed and sealed by a professional registered in the State of Florida. The Construction Services Inspector will field inspect as -built drawings for accuracy. General Note: DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. Development Review Agenda - Thursday, August 7, 2008 - Page 6 DRC Anion Agenda L 1 Parking System Conc ns: 0 Parking System- conditions related to original submittal (April 28, 2008): Prior to review by the Community Development Board: 1. Where will employees and customers park? The City's public parking inventory is very limited in this area of Clearwater Beach and there is not sufficient public parking available to replace the parking spaces required for this use. NOT MET 2. Parking Study: Temp. Lot #62 -S and #62 -N should not be considered as they are temporary and leased on a month to month basis. Additionally, data for lot #62 -N does not indicate the lot closes @ sunset. Counts for this location (after the 7 PM count) would be invalid in calculating the occupancy figures. NOT MET 3. Parking Study: Section III - Sat. 4/5 "...This is attributable to the Spring Break atmosphere..." During most of the seasonal weekends (Feb. - Sept.), Holidays and special events, parking demand is identical or close to Spring Break conditions and should be considered more of a normal condition. NOT MET 4. Parking Study: Table 1 & Table 2 indicate the on -site Frenchy's parking is never 100% -- Why? Where is staff parking now and are the spaces open,& available to the Public? 5. Parking Study: IV. Future Conditions. The 94 Temporary parking spaces recently added to the old Adam's Mark site should not be a consideration as the term of the lease is only through 9/08 and then month to month. NOT MET Parking System conditions related to the applicant's resubmittal (7/24/2008): 1. All temporary parking lots should be eliminated from the calculations in Table 1 & 2 Lot #62 -5 36 spaces Lot #62 -N 67 Spaces 2. Eliminate Frenchy's Lot from all calculations in Tables 1 & 2 because the applicant's request is to eliminate all parking completely for the expansion. This parking should not be considered. 3. Under the Future Conditions and Conclusions portion of the report there is mention of 92 additional "Temporary" spaces at the old Adam's Mark site. This parking should not be included in the public parking supply either. All conclusions referring to percentages shall be recalculated once the tables are adjusted as mentioned above. 4. Eliminating all on -site parking sets a precedent today and will affect any future change of ownership or use for this particular property as it relates to on -site parking. Explain how this is an equitable request and how if approved it will not have an adverse impact if the buiness is sold or a change of use of this property be proposed in the future. Environmental: 1 , No issues. Fire: No issues Harbor Master: No Comments Legal: No Comments Land Resources: 1 . No Issues. Landscaping: I . 07- 30 -08: Revised plans have not addressed this requirement. Pursuant to CDC Section 3- 1204.1), all landscaping must be protected from vehicular traffic by the installation of curbing along the perimeter of any landscaping which adjoins vehicular use areas. Parks and Recreation: 1 . No issues (commercial expansion - 35% increase). Stormwater: Development Review Agenda - Thursday, August 7, 2008 - Page 7 DRC Action Agcnda 1.1 The following shallfaddressed prior to issuance of the Building Art. 1. Provide drainge calculations showing the required attenuation volume for the additional impervious and/or redevelopment area and the current cost per square feet of the property to assess the payment in -lieu amount. 2. Provide a copy of the approved SWFWMD permit or letter of exemption. General note: 1. DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. Solid Waste: No Comments Traffic Engineering: 1 . On the handicap parking sign, change the Florida Statute (F.S.) number to read "318.18 ". 2. Provide a wheel stop for handicap parking stall to prevent the gate from being hit. 3. Install parking mirrors for added sight visibility for motorists backing out of the parking stall. 4. Relocate the handicap parking space to the location that was agreed upon in a meeting with the City. The handicap parking stall shall be relocated further to the east where the drive aisle is at its widest. 5. What is the purpose of the proposed swing gate? How will this gate impact dumpster and Solid Waste access? 6. Provide a letter indicating that the applicant will not hold the City of Clearwater responsible for the lack of parking spaces for employees and guests. 7. Will proposed handicap parking space block Solid Waste vehicles access to dumpster? 8. After further review of the latest parking study traffic operations has the following comments about the Parking System Manager's assessment of the study: Planning: 1) We concur with the City's Parking Manager's comments. 2) The current parking spaces shall not be removed due to the following reasons: a. The City's permanent public parking lot nearest the restaurant cannot handle the additional expected vehicular trips generated by their proposal. b. Applicant shall not depend on the temporary parking lots because they will eventually go away. c. The lack of parking spaces on site will encourage commercial parking on nearby residential streets which is unacceptable. The above shall be addressed prior to a Community Development Board (CDB) hearing. General Note(s): 1) Applicant shall comply with the current Transportation Impact Fee Ordinance and fee schedule and paid prior to a Certificate of Occupancy (C.O.). 2) DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. Development Review Agenda - Thursday, August 7, 2008 - Page 8 DRC Action Agenda I.I 07- 30 -08: A response Better provided refers to an attached narrative. Ach narrative has been provided. The written response provided in the application remains as initially submitted. Pursuant to CDC Section 2- 803.C.3, the redevelopment will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of surrounding properties. The response provided with the application is inaccurate as the proposal does extend on -site development past the currently developed limits. 07- 30 -08: The plans do not include the HW Pot Sink as being incorporated into the proposed square footage. In fact, the civil plans indicate that the sink is "portable "; however the architectural elevations clearly depict the sink as being part of the building addition. Correct the plans. The HW Pot Sink must be counted as part of the proposed new square footage. 07- 30 -08: A response letter provided refers to an attached narrative. No such narrative has been provided. The written response provided in the application remains as initially submitted. Pursuant to CDC Section 2- 803.C.2, redevelopment shall be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan as well as the general purpose, intent and basic planning objectives of this Code and with the intent and purpose of the zoning district. The response provided with the application does not address these provisions and further does not address the requested deviations from the Code requirements. 4. 07- 30 -08: A response letter provided refers to an attached narrative. No such narrative has been provided. The written response provided in the application remains as initially submitted. Pursuant to Community Development Code (CDC) Section 2- 803.C.1, redevelopment as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project must otherwise be impractical without deviations from the development standards set forth in the zoning district. While a portion of the site exists with a zero -foot side (south) setback, the proposal would enlarge the area where this setback exists. As per the above, why must the proposed deck be constructed in the setback and adjacent to the property line? Further, the written response does not address the requested parking deviation. 5 . Parking Analysis, Section III., Customer Characteristics, states that "it would be appropriate to reduce Frenchy's parking requirement based on a 50% walk -up rate. Therefore, a 15 space requirement is appropriate ". This would seem to strongly contradict the request to eliminate the required parking for the subject property. 6. 07- 30 -08: The response provided to this comment refers to an "architects' response." No such response has been provided. Further, the plans submitted continue to depict a stage. What is the intended use of the stage? 7. 07- 30 -08: Response noted. This issue, however, will remain a condition of approval. BCP1999- 12578, which added a restroom, deck and 267 square foot second floor addition expired without a Certificate of Occupancy being issued. BCP2003- 02560, which was to obtain inspections for the aforementioned additions also expired without a Certificate of Occupancy being issued. These issues MUST be addressed as part of this approval (permits were associated with FLS 00- 01 -01). 8 . 07- 30 -08: While dimensions for the cooler and freezer have been provided, dimensions /square footage was not provided for the HW Pot Sink. Please provide. Provide the square footage of the Cooler, Freezer and the HW Pot Sink. 9. 07- 30 -08: The architectural and civil plans continue to be inconsistent. The plans must be consistent prior to the application being brought before the CDB. The architectural site plan does not depict the rear sidewalks as they have been depicted on the civil plans. Development Review Agenda - Thursday, August 7, 2008 - Page 9 DRC Acdoii Agenda I, I 10 . 07- 30 -08: This comic has not been addressed. • The architectural and civil site plans call for the existing deck to be extended to the west property line. However, the reduction of the required front setback to zero feet has not been included in the Description of Request in the application, and the written response to the General Applicability Criteria and the Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria do not address the requested reduction of the front (west) setback. 11 . 07- 30 -08: The enlargement continues to not be depicted on the civil drawings and an exact dimension has not been provided. The architectural site plan calls for the enlargement of the existing entry by +/- four feet. First, this is not depicted on the civil plans. Second, provide an exact dimension by which the entry is proposed to be enlarged. Third, provide architectural elevations that depict the change in appearance that this enlargement would bring. 12 . 07- 30 -08: The response letter indicates that the turf block is being removed. However, the proposed plans do not depict this. Revise the plans to depict what is being proposed. The civil plans do not indicate what is to occur with all of the existing turf block parking. Clarify. 13 . 07- 30 -08: The architectural elevation submitted do not accurately depict what is being proposed on the site plan. The west elevation fails to depict existing stairs, and the proposed deck/stage. The east elevation fails to depict the new deck and ramp and any portion of the second level. Provide architectural elevations that clearly depict how the new addition and new /expanded decks and entrance will relate to the existing building. 14. 07- 30 -08: While, 'Building Area" has been clarified to represent the first floor, it is still unclear as to whether the cooler or freezer have been considered part of this figure. Additionally, provide the square footage for the existing second floor. Clarify if "Building Area" as denoted in the Site Data Table represents the total square footage of the building (first floor, second floor, cooler, freezer - which it should) or only the building footprint. 15 . 07- 30 -08: The statement provided in the response letter is inaccurate. As such, the following comment remains unaddressed. The Project Narrative submitted with the application states "the project also involves the removal of six (6) unused, substandard parking spaces located behind the building... "; however photographic evidence also submitted with the application depicts the parking as being used. These photographs are not only contrary to the statement made in the Narrative, but also contrary to the application itself as it shows that the existing parking is utilized patrons and /or employees of the restaurant and is therefore clearly necessary for the use. 16. 07- 30 -08: The response provided does not address the issue raised below. Regardless of whether the addition is being used for restroom access /overflow standing or a seating area, it is still a structure proposed to be built at a zero setback and utilized/occupied by patrons of the business. Pursuant to CDC Section 3- 913.A.6, the design of the proposal shall minimize adverse effects, including visual, acoustic, olfactory and hours of operation impacts on adjacent properties. How will the expansion of the dining area (deck) at a zero -foot setback from the south property line and the addition of a stage also at a zero -foot setback from the south property. line not result in an adverse visual, acoustic, olfactory and hours of operation impact upon the adjacent property'? 17 . 07- 30 -08: The revised parking analysis does not address this requirement. Pursuant to CDC Section 3- 913.A.4, the proposal shall be designed to minimize traffic congestion. The written response provided with the application that "the proposed addition does not increase vehicle trips to the area" does not address the entire proposal, which eliminates the six existing parking spaces that serve the use as it presently exists. How does the creation of a greater parking demand coupled with the elimination of existing parking not increase traffic congestion? Development Review Agenda - Thursday, August 7, 2008 - Page 10 DRC Actioi, ASciid.i I I 18 . 07- 30 -08: The reviseparking analysis does not address this issue. Is The parking analysis is unclear as to whether the estimated 50% walk -up rate for Frenchy's South Beach expected to continue following the construction of the proposed additions? 19 . 07- 30 -08: The revised parking analysis does not address this issue. Pursuant to Parking Analysis; Section V; Conclusion, "the expansion of Frenchy's South Beach Cafe is not expected to realistically create any additional parking demand due to the customer characteristics ". The conclusion states there is an existing parking demand; however no findings are made to support the elimination of the existing parking for the existing restaurant. As such, the analysis fails to justify the reduction in parking for this proposal. 20. 07- 30 -08: The response provided does not address how the proposed addition at a zero -foot setback is approprate given the location of the adjacent building. Further, how has an appropriate buffer been provided? This criterion must be satisfactoraly addressed. Pursuant to CDC Section 2- 803.C.6.e, the proposal shall provide for appropriate buffers, enhanced landscape design and appropriate distances between buildings. How does the construction of a deck/stage at a zero -foot setback from the south property line represent an appropriate distance from the adjacent building? How is an appropriate buffer provided? 21 . 07- 30 -08: The revised parking analysis does not address this issue. The parking analysis compares Frenchy's South Beach to two different businesses for the purpose of walk -up traffic comparisons and states that it is similar; however these similar businesses have an 11% disparity between them. Revise the analysis to better state the projected walk -up traffic for the subject use. 22 . 07- 30 -08: This comment has not been addressed. The Description of Request in the application as well as the Project Narrative provided state the building addition as being 560 square feet in size, which is inconsistent with the actual plans. Revise as appropriate. 23 . 07- 30 -08: The revised parking analysis does not address this issue. Pursuant to Parking Analysis; Section IV; Future Conditionw with Expansion, "other than the hours of 12 Noon to 4PM on Saturday there are adequate existing parking spaces to support the expansion ". This would seem to indicate that during several peak business hours the proposed reduction in required off - street parking would not be favorable, which is inconsistent with the purpose of this analysis and your request. 24 . 07- 30 -08: The revised parking analysis does not address this issue. Pursuant to Parking Analysis; Section IV; Future Conditionw with Expansion, two existing parking spaces are to be available to satisfy any additional demand created by the restaurant. Two points: first, the conclusion of this analysis states there will be no additional parking demand, so what additional demand does this section refer to? Second, the site plan proposes no parking spaces. 25 . 07- 30 -08: It must be remembered that the request being made must comply with the parameters of the application through which it is being requested. As such, compliance with the following CDC Section must be met. Pursuant to CDC Section 2- 803.C.6.d, in order to form a cohesive, visually interesting and attractive appearance, the proposal incorporates a substantial number of design elements (see elements listed in Code). How does the proposal meet this criterion? It would seem as if nothing is proposed to achieve compliance with this required element of the Comprehensive Infrll Redevelopment application. 26 . 07- 30 -08: This inaccuracy is still stated in the revised parking analysis. Parking Analysis; Section IV; Future Conditions with Expansion: According to a strict interpretation of the Code the proposed restaurant would require 32 parking spaces, not between 15 and 32. Revise. Development Review Agenda - Thursday, August 7, 2008 - Page 11 DRC Aaion Ag,nda L 1 Notes: 27 . 07- 30 -08: The revise0aarking analysis does not address this issue. I* Pursuant to Parking Analysis; Section III; Customer Characteristics: Frenchy's South Beach is expected to experience a similar rate of walk -up customers to Frenchy's Rockaway / Post Corner Pizza and "it would be appropriate to reduce Frenchy's parking requirement based on a 50% walk -up rate ". While it may or may not be appropriate to "reduce" the parking requirement by 50 %, the proposal would eliminate the parking requirement by 100 %, which is inconsistent with your customer characteristics. 28 . The proposed site plan (architect) denotes "new seating in plaza" to the west of the subject property. Please be advised that this is not being considered as part of this request/application. 29. 07- 30 -08: The "revised" plans continue to denote the proposal of a "stage." Further, no evidence has been provided that the proposed structure will not result in a detriment to the adjacent property. Pursuant to CDC Section 2- 803.C.4, adjacent properties shall not suffer substantial detriment as a result of the proposed development. How does the location of a stage directly at the south property line not result in the potential detriment to the adjacent property. Other: No Comments Development Review Agenda - Thursday, August 7, 2008 - Page 12 DRC AM- Ag .Wo I.I • Keith Zayac & Associates, Inc. Civil Engineering, Landscape Architecture, Planning July 14, 2008 L� 701 S. Enterprise Road E., Ste 404 Safety Harbor, FL 34695 (727)793 -9888 Phone (727) 793 -9855 Fax Brian@keithzayac.com 351 S GULFVIEW BLVD FLD2008 -04009 FRENCHY'S SOUTH BEACH City of Clearwater Zonina: T atlas# 100 S. Myrtle Street Clearwater, FL 33756 v4Mt? RE: FLD20084� - - 351 GULFVIEW BLVD Please find attached the following in response to comments generated by the City from the review of the above - mentioned project: • Flexible Development Application for Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, • Warranty Deed, • Title Insurance Commitment, • Color Photographs of existing site, • Civil Construction drawings (full size), °`° cte • Civil Construction drawings (8 %" x 11 ") L °' '' • Boundary, and Topographical Surve ary� Y� C= r o f f r • Architectural Building Elevation Drawings (full size), G ' ° C*_J �: p :! • Architectural Building Elevation drawings (8' /z" x 11 "), "Y _ 13 y • Revised Parking Demand Study. In addition, we have addressed the City's specific comments individually below. c:- Prior to review by the Community Development Board 1. Regarding the parking study, this application proposes the deletion of existing parking spaces and no request that an additional 4 to 9 parking spaces not be provided for a 548 sq. ft restaurant expansion. This will result in a 10 -15 parking space demand on the public parking system. According to the parking study no parking is available in the two studied parking lots 325 and 33 between the hours of 12 noon and 4pm. where will employees and customers park during there hours. a. Please see the attached parking analysis. Based on the DRC meeting on May 1, 2008 and subsequent parking meeting with Public Works, Traffic Operations and Parking System on June 9, 2008 the parking analysis has been revised. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy 1. Applicants shall submit 5 sets of as -built drawings that are signed and sealed by a professional registered in the State of Florida. The Construction Services inspector will field inspect as -built drawings for accuracy. • 0 a. Acknowledged. Five (5) sets of signed and sealed As -Built surveys will be provided upon completion of construction, prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. General Note: DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review: additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit application. Parking System Comments 1. Where will employees and customers park / The City's public parking inventory is very limited in this area of Clearwater Beach and there is not sufficient public parking available to replace the parking spaces required for this use. a. Please see the attached parking analysis. Based on the DRC meeting on May 1, 2008 and subsequent parking meeting with Public Works, Traffic Operations and Parking System on June 9, 2008 the parking analysis has been revised. 2. Parking Study: Temp. Lot # 62 -S and # 62 -N should not be considered as they are temporary and leased on month to month basis. Additionally, date for lot #62 -N does not indicate the lot closes @ sunset. a. Please see the attached parking analysis. Based on the DRC meeting on May 1, 2008 and subsequent parking meeting with Public Works, Traffic Operations and Parking System on June 9, 2008 the parking analysis has been revised. 9 ct:: gam% 3. Parking study: Section III — sat 4/S" this is attributable to the spring break � e,` a atmosphere. During most of the seasonal weekends (Feb -Sept) Holidays and special V events, parking demand is identical or close to spring break conditions and should be ip t, considered more of a normal condition. - ? 0 Lu a. Please see the attached parking analysis. Based on the DRC meeting on May 1, 2008 and subsequent parking meeting with Public Works, Traffic Operations and Parking System on June 9, 2008 the parking analysis has been revised. 4. Parking study: Table I and table 2 indicate the on -site Frenchey's parking is never 100% Why? Where is staff parking now and are the spaces open and available to the public? a. Please see the attached parking analysis. Based on the DRC meeting on May 1, 2008 and subsequent parking meeting with Public Works, Traffic Operations and Parking System on June 9, 2008 the parking analysis has been revised. S. Parking Study: IV Future Conditions. The 94 temp parking spaces recently added to the old Adams Mark site should not be a consideration as the term of the lease is only through 9108 and then month to month. a. Please see the attached parking analysis. Based on the DRC meeting on May 1, 2008 and subsequent parking meeting with Public Works, Traffic Operations and Parking System on June 9, 2008 the parking analysis has been revised. Landscaping 1. Pursuant to community development code (CDC) section 3- 1202.B.I palms can be used to satisfy 75% of tree requirements on the beach. The landscape plans proposes palms to satisfy 100% of the tree requirement. a. Please refer to the revised landscape plan. Oaks have been added where space allows to satisfy this requirement. • 0 2. Pursuant to CDC Section 3 -1204 D all landscaping must be protected from vehicular traffic by the installation of curbing along the perimeter of any landscaping which adjoins vehicular use areas. a. The landscaped areas are protected from vehicular traffic by wooden ties/curb. These can be seen in the previously provided site pictures. 3. The landscape plan does not appear to depict the landscaping for the entire property (see north property line) Revise the plan to depict all existing /proposed landscaping. Further as per CDC Section 2 -803. C. 6 e in order to form a cohesive, visually interesting and attractive appearance the proposed development shall provide for enhanced landscape design. Thus, it may be beneficial in achieving compliance with this criterion for the existing landscaping along the north property -line to be upgraded consistent with Code requirements. a. Please refer to the revised construction plans. The existing landscaping has been added and upgrades are proposed for portions of the landscaping along the north property line. Stormwater The following shall be addressed prior to Community Development Board. 1. Provide water quality and attenuation for the redevelopment area. The design shall meet the City criteria. a. City staff has indicated that payment -in -lieu will be required due to existing site constraints. The following shall be addressed at Building Permit Application. l 1. Provide a copy of the approved SWFWA4D permit or letter of exemption. a. A copy of the SWFWNM Noticed General Permit or letter of exemption will be cC=.9 forwarded to the City upon issuance, and prior to the release of building permits. .1 L2 Note: additional comments may be forthcoming based on the response to the above conditions. U 1. DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. a. Acknowledged. Traffic Engineering 1. Provide required number of handicap parking spaces compliance with Florida Accessibility Code for Building Construction Chapter 11, Section 11 -4.1.2 a. Please refer to the revised construction plans. A handicap parking space has been provided. The location of this space came at the City's direction during a meeting with Public Works, Traffic Operations and Parking System on June 9, 2008. 2. Provide handicap parking stall and sign details compliance with city standards. • 0 a. The City's standard handicap parking stall and sign details have been added to the plans. 3. Provide an accessible path from a building's accessible entrance to a public sidewalk compliant with Florida Accessibility Code for Building Construction Chapter H. Section 11- 4.3.2. a. Please refer to the revised construction plans. The handicap parking space has been proposed with an accessible path along the existing concrete driveway and sidewalk to the existing accessible ramp at the entrance to the restaurant The above to be addressed prior to a Community Development Board (CDB) hearing. L Applicant's shall comply with the current Transportation impactfee ordinances and fee schedule and paid prior to a Certificate of Occupancy (C. O.) a. Acknowledged. 2. DRC review is a prerequisite for building permit review; additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a building permit application. 0 a. Acknowledged. Planning' -rn 'D V BCP1999- 12578, which added a restroom, deck and 267 square foot second floor addition expired without a certificate of occupancy being issued. BCP2003- 02560, which was to obtain inspections for the aforementioned additions also expired without a certificate of occupancy being issued. These issues MUST be addressed as part of this approval (permits were associated with FLS 00- 01 -01. a. The referenced permits will be addressed in conjunction with this project. (Pursuant to Community Development Code (CDC) section 2- 803.0.1 redevelopment /// as part of a Comprehensive infill Redevelopment project must otherwise be impractical without deviations from the development standards set forth in the zoning district. While a portion of the site exists with a zero foot side (south) setback, the proposal would enlarge the area where this setback exists. As per the above why must the proposed deck be constructed in the setback and adjacent to the property line? Further, the written response does not address the requested parking deviaton. a. Please refer to the attached narrative addressing the application description issues. :;_r PSI t; a �3: )Comprehensive Pursuant to CDC Section 2- 803.0.2 redevelopment shall be consistent with the Plan as well as the general purpose, intent and basic planning objectives of this Code and with the intent and purpose of the zoning district. The response provided with the application does not address these provisions and further does not address the requested deviations from the code requirements. a. Please refer to the attached narrative addressing the application description issues. C4°ursuant to CDC Section 2 -803. 4 the redevelopment will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of surrounding properties. The response provided with the application is inaccurate as the proposal does extend on -site development past the currently developed limits. �a © c 4 r L • 0 a. Please refer to the attached narrative addressing the application description issues. 05ursuant to CDC Section 2 -803. C. 4 adjacent properties shall not suffer substantial detriment as a result of the proposed development. How does the location of a stage directly at the south property line not result in the potential detriment to the adjacent property. ,� 5 a. This was previously mislabeled. There is no proposed stage. The deck expansion provides for restroom access and overlay standing room. The neighbors to the south (Ritz Motel) are providing a letter of no objection to the expanded deck. This letter will be forwarded to the City under separate cover. 1,1a� OPursuant to CDC Section 2 -803. C. 6d, in order to form a cohesive visually ,i interesting and attractive appearance, the proposal incorporates a substantial number of design elements (see elements listed in code) How does the proposal meet this criterion? It would seem as if nothing is proposed to achieve compliance with this required element of the comprehensive infill Redevelopment application. a. It must be remembered that this is an expansion to an existing building. As such, the design elements are based on existing appearance. Please refer to the architectural response for specifics. 2 7. Pursuant to CDC Section 2 -503. C. 6 the proposal shall provide for appropriate k-- buffers enhanced landscape design and appropriate distances between buildings. How does the construction of a deck/stage at a zero foot setback from the south property line represent an appropriate distance from the adjacent building? How is V, c o an appropriate buffer provided? " ;' ' a. The deck expansion at zero foot setback is part of the request. A portion of the Q, existing building is built at zero setback and to provide restroom access and waiting area, we are requesting to extend the deck. Reference the photographs of the site. There is currently no buffer, as the existing deck and covered ramp extends into the existing concrete areas. An upgraded landscaped area is proposed between the building addition and the ramp to offset the zero setback. Pursuant to CDC Section 3- 913.A.4 the proposal shall be designed to minimize -r° traffic congestion. The written response provided with the application that "the proposed addition does not increase vehicle trips to the area Does not address the entire proposal, which eliminate the six existing parking spaces that serve the use as if presently exists. How does the creation of a greater parking demand couples with the elimination of existing parking not increase traffic congestion? a. Please see the attached parking analysis. Based on the DRC meeting on May 1, 2008 and subsequent parking meeting with Public Works, Traffic Operations and Parking System on June 9, 2008 the parking analysis has been revised. ursuant to CDC Section 3- 913.A.6, the design of the proposal shall minimize adverse effects, including visual, acoustic, olfactory and hours of operation impacts MST on adjacent properties. How will the expansion of the dining area (deck) at a zero- foot setback from the south property line and the addition of a stage also at a zero - foot set back from the south property line adverse visual, acoustic, olfactory and hours of operation impact upon the adjacent property? a. The proposed deck extension is for restroom access and overflow standing. There is no proposed expansion of dining area or stage. • • 7a.—PrIcase ovide the square footage of the cooler, freezer and th pot sink. o� refer to the architectural response. These are po ble is that will be placed on open -air concrete pads. N OlWhat is the intended use of the stage? a. There is no proposed stage. Please also refer to the architectural response. 12. a architectural site plan does not depict the rear sidewalks as they have been depicted on the civil plans. a. The architectural and civil plans will continue to be coordinated as design changes and comments are addressed. The two sets of plans will match prior to the issuance of building permits. 13. The architectural and civil site plans call for the existing ete to be extended to the N� west property line. However, the reduction of the required front setback 10 feet has not been included in the description of request in the application, and the written response to the General Applicability Criteria and the Comprehensive infill Redevelopment Project criteria do not address the requires reduction of the front (west) setback. a. Please refer to the attached narrative addressing the application description issues. (j4_yhe architectural site plan calls for the enlargement of the existing entry by +/-four feet. First, this is not depicted on the civil plans. Second, provide an exact dimension by which the entry is proposed to be enlarged. Third, provide architectural elevations that depict the change in appearance that this enlargement would bring. a. The civil plans show site related design. The architectural plans show building 1, related design. Please refer to the revised architectural plans and response.? �. G� • Is the proposed deck to be covered? If either case, provide architectural elevation�sa,%.f I c 4 3 the entire south elevation of the business. a. Please refer to the architect's response and revised documents. 0 Lt: `6J �+ 06. The HW Pot Sink must be counted as part of the proposed new square footage. ' a. Please refer to the architect's response and revised documents. With the inclusion of the new gate – how will solid waste pick -up occur? a. It should be noted that a gate currently exists – the plans note that the existing gate is being replaced. This can be seen in the previously provided photographs, survey, and construction plans. Solid waste pick -up will continue to be collected in the same manner it does now – via curbside pick-up. The dumpsters are rolled out to the property line for pick-up. kAm- – , he civil plans do not indicate what is to occur with all of the existing turf block parking. Clarify. a. The existing turf block (and associated parking spaces) are being removed. 19. Provide architectural elevations that clearly depict how the new addition and new /expanded decks and entrance will relate to the existing building. a. Please refer to the architect's response and revised documents. 0 • The proposed sliding gate would not appear to provide adequate clearance to allow vehicles to access the rear of the site. a. The label has been corrected to note a "swinging" gate, instead of a sliding gate. '. What does the proposed sliding gate connect to? According to the survey only a two- feet high concrete wall and the building itself are in the area of the gate. a. The proposed swinging gate attaches to poles, in the same manner it currently does. According to the survey. There is a large area of turf block at the rear of the property that is for the existing parking spaces. The site plan does not propose the removal of all the turf block in conjunction with the elimination of the parking spaces. Revise the site and landscape plans. a. The revised construction plans call for the removal of all turf block. WICYr qbarift if "Building area" as denoted in the Site Data Table represents the total M� square footage of the building first floor, second floor, cooler, freezer -which it should) or only the building footprint. a. Please refer to the revised Site Data Table. The areas have been revised for clarity. Please note that the cooler and freezer are not part of the building. They are moveable units which will be placed on open -air concrete pads. Parking analysis; section III, Friday, April 4, 2008: Clark whether the low of 48 spaces occurred at IOpm or IOam. a. Please see the attached parking analysis. Based on the DRC meeting on May 1, 2008 and subsequent parking meeting with Public Works, Traffic Operations and Parking System on June 9, 2008 the parking analysis has been revised. 25()ursuant to parking Analysis; Section III; Customer Characteristics: Frenchy's South Beach is expected to experience a similar rate of walk -up customers to Frenchy's Rockaway /Post corner Pizza and "it would be appropriate to reduce Frenchy's parking requirement by 50% the proposal would eliminate the parking requirement by 100% which is inconsistent with your customer characteristics. a. Please see the attached parking analysis. Based on the DRC meeting on May 1, 2008 and subsequent parking meeting with Public Works, Traffic Operations and Parking System on June 9, 2008 the parking analysis has been revised. 26. Parking analysis; Section IV; Future Conditions with Expansion: According to a strict interpretation of the code the proposed restaurant would require 32 parking spaces. Not between 15 and 32. Revise. a. Please see the attached parking analysis. Based on the DRC meeting on May 1, 2008 and subsequent parking meeting with Public Works, Traffic Operations and Parking System on June 9, 2008 the parking analysis has been revised. "trr 27. ursuant to parking analysis, Section IV, future condition with Expansion two VAV 1 existing parking spaces are to be available to satisfy any additional demand created by the restaurant. Two points first the conclusion of this analysis states there will be no additional parking demand. So what additional demand does this section refer to? Second, the site plan proposes no parking spaces. L c: cIQ 0 a. Please see the attached parking analysis. Based on the DRC meeting on May 1, 2008 and subsequent parking meeting with Public Works, Traffic Operations and Parking System on June 9, 2008 the parking analysis has been revised. No--r Pursuant to parking analysis; Section IV Conclusion, Future condition with VAIF—T expansion, other than the hours of 12 noon to 4pm on Saturday there are adequate existing parking spaces to support the expansion. This would seem to indicate that during several peak business hours the proposed reduction in required off-street parking would not be favorable, which is inconsistent with the purpose of this analysis and your request. a. Please see the attached parking analysis. Based on the DRC meeting on May 1, 2008 and subsequent parking meeting with Public Works, Traffic Operations and Parking System on June 9, 2008 the parking analysis has been revised. i 10'r- Pursuant to parking analysis; section V, conclusion, "the expansion of Frenchy's tom+^ South Beach Cafe is not expected to realistically create any additional parking demand due to the customer characteristics ". The conclusion states there is an existing parking demand due to the customer characteristics. The conclusion states there is an existing parking demand; however no findings are made to support the elimination of the existing parking for the existing restaurant. As such the analysis fails to juste the reduction in parking for this proposal. a. Please see the attached parking analysis. Based on the DRC meeting on May 1, 2008 and subsequent parking meeting with Public Works, Traffic Operations and Parking System on June 9, 2008 the parking analysis has been revised. "0 ' 30. The parking analysis is unclear as to whether the estimated 50% walk -up rate for Frenchy's South Beach expected to continue following the construction of the proposed additions. = =� a. Please see the attached parking analysis. Based on the DRC meeting on May 1, L" 2008 and subsequent parking meeting with Public Works, Traffic Operations and Parking System on June 9, 2008 the parking analysis has been revised. G "2 i-1C 31 The parking analysis compares Frenchy's South Beach to two different business for iT the purpose of walk -up traffic comparisons and states that it is similar; however these similar business have an 11 % disparity between them. Revise the analysis to better state the projected walk -up traffic for the subject use. a. Please see the attached parking analysis. Based on the DRC meeting on May 1, 2008 and subsequent parking meeting with Public Works, Traffic Operations and Parking System on June 9, 2008 the parking analysis has been revised. d16 The description of request in the application as well as the project narrative provided 0�7 state the building addition as being 560 square feet in size, which is inconsistent with the actual plans. Revise as appropriate. a. Please refer to the revised construction plans. 3The project narrative submitted with the application states "the project also involves the removal of six (6) unused, substandard parking spaces located behind the building; however photographic evidence also submitted with the application depicts the parking as being used. These photographs are not only contrary to the statement made in the narrative, but also contrary to the application itself as its shown that the existing parking is utilized patrons and/or employees of the restaurant and us therefore clearly necessary for the use. r•- CO F ' l G ', i, E- 0 0 a. The previously provided photographs showed one car in the parking lot. The car belongs to the engineer who was on site taking the photographs. Please refer to the revised parking analysis for additional information. Thank you for your time in the review of the above responses and revised documents. If there are any further concerns or additional items are needed, feel free to contact me directly at (727) 793- 9888, ext. 307. Sincerely, L1 1,4- - Brian Wilkes Keith Zayac & Associates, Inc. C_f C-�j 01 L: =� L.m 3 PLANNING DEPARTMENT July 15, 2008 Mrs. Janet Baustert Frenchy's South Beach, Inc. 419 Eastshore Drive Clearwater, Florida 33767 0 • CITY OF CLEARWATER POST OFFICE BOX 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758 -4748 MUNICIPAL, SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562 -4567 FAX (727) 562 -4865 Re: FLD2008 -04009 1 351 S. Gulfview Boulevard I Letter of Completeness Dear Mrs. Baustert: The Planning Department staff has recieved your revised submittal for the above referenced case. After a preliminary review of the submitted documents, staff has determined that the application is complete. The Development Review Committee (DRC) will review the application for sufficiency on Thursday, August 7, 2008, in the Planning Department Conference Room (Room 216), which is located on the second floor of the Municipal Services Building at 100 South Myrtle Avenue. You will be contacted by the Planning Department's Administrative Analyst within one week prior to the meeting date for the approximate time that your case will ha reviMA/arl. You G'r youur representative (as applicable) must be present to answer any questions that the DRC may have regarding your application. Additional comments may be generated by the DRC at the time of the meeting. Sincerely, C, `7 e Robert G. Tefft, Planner III Tel: (727) 562 -4539 Fax: (727) 562 -4865 E -Mail: robert.tefft @myclearwater.com cc: Brian Wilkes, Keith Zayac & Associates, Inc (via fax) "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER" 0 CITY OF CLEARWATER LL PLANNING DEPARTMENT .. 0 ater 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE _ CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 o TEL: (727) 562 -4567 FAX: (727) 562 -4865. Date: To: From: Re: Comments: FACSIMILE COVER SHEET July 15, 2008 Brian Wilkes, (727) 793 -9855 Robert G. Tefft, Planner III FLD2008 -04009 1 351 S. Gulfview Boulevard Number of Pages Including Cover Sheet: 2 ** Please confirm receipt via e-mail at: rohert.te(f 0brnvelearnvater.com ** ** Visit the Planning Department online at www welearwater.com ** • • DRAFT ACTION AGENDA DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE Thursday, May 1, 2008 8:30 a.m. STAFF REVIEW 9.00 am Case Number: FLD2008 -04009 — 351 S GULFVIEW BLVD Owner(s): Preston, Michael G Tre .419 Eastshore Dr Clearwater, Fl 33767 TELEPHONE: 727, -449 -2729, FAX: 727 - 446 -0588, E -MAIL: No Email Applicant Janet Baustert 419 East Shore Drive Clearwater, F133767 TELEPHONE: 727 -449 -2729, FAX: 727 - 446 -0588, E -MAIL: No Email Location: 0.15 acres on east side of Gulfview Boulevard, approximately 60 feet north of Fifth Street Printed: 4/29/2008 Times are subject to change Atlas Page: Zoning District: T, Tourist Request: Flexible Development approval forf628—s4uare foot addition to an existing restaurant within the Tourist (T) District with reductions to the front (west) setback from 15 feet to zero feet, the side (south) setback from 10 feet to zero feet, the side (north) setback from 10 feet to zero feet, and the rear (east) setback from 20 feet to 4 feet; and to reduce the off - street parking requirement from 32 parking spaces to zero parking spaces as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project pursuant to Community Development Code (CDC) Section 2- 803.C. Proposed Use: Restaurants Neighborhood Clearwater Beach Association Association(s): Clearwater, F133767 100 Devon Dr TELEPHONE: 443 -2168, FAX: No Fax, E -MAIL: papamurphy @aol.com Neighborhood Clearwater Neighborhoods Coalition Association(s): Clearwater, FI 33763 1821 Springwood Cir S TELEPHONE:. No Phone, FAX: No Fax, E -MAIL: No Email Presenter: Robert Tefft, Planner III Attendees Included: The DRC reviewed this application with the following comments: General Engineering: Development Review Agenda - Thursday, May 1, 2008 - Page 1 DRC AUim Agm& I.1 • • Prior to review by the Community Development Board: 1. Regarding the parking study, this application proposes the deletion of 6 existing parking spaces and to request that an additional 4 to 9 parking spaces not be provided for a 548 sq.ft. restaurant expansion. This will result in a 10 - 15. parking space demand on the public parking system. According to the parking study no parking is available in the two studied parking lots 32S and 33 . between the hours of 12 noon and 4:00 p.m. Where will employees and customers park during these hours? Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy: 1. Applicant shall submit 5 sets of as -built drawings that are signed and sealed by a professional registered in the State of Florida. The Construction Services Inspector will field inspect as -built drawings for accuracy. General Note: DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. . PARKING SYSTEM COMMENTS: Prior to review by the Community. Development Board: 1) Where will employees and customers park? The City's public parking inventory is very limited in this area of Clearwater Beach and there is not sufficient public parking available to replace the parking spaces required for this use. 2) Parking Study: Temp. Lot #62 -S and #62 -N should not be considered as they are temporary and leased on a month to month basis. Additionally, data for lot #62 -N does not indicate the lot closes @ sunset.. Counts for this location (after the 7 PM count) would be invalid in calculating the occupancy. figures. 3) Parking Study: Section III - Sat. 4/5 "...This is attributable to the Spring Break atmosphere..." During most of the seasonal weekends (Feb. - Sept.), Holidays and special events, parking demand is identical or close to Spring Break conditions and should be considered more of a normal condition. 4) Parking Study: Table 1, & Table 2 indicate the on -site Frenchy's parking is never 100% -- Why? Where is staff parking now and are the spaces open & available to the Public? 5) Parking Study: IV. Future Conditions. The 94. Temp. parking spaces recently added to the old Adam's Mark site should not be a consideration as the term of the lease is only through 9/08 and then month to month. Environmental: No issues. Fire: 1 . No issues Harbor Master: No Comments Legal: No Comments Land Resources: No Issues. Landscaping: Development Review Agenda - Thursday, May. 1, 2008 Page 2 DRC Action Agmde 1.1 . • • Pursuant to Community. Development Code (CDC) Section 3- 1202.13.1, palms can be used to satisfy. 75% of tree requirements on the beach. The landscape plans proposes palms to satisfy 100% of the tree requirement. Pursuant to CDC Section 3- 1204.13, all landscaping must be protected from vehicular traffic by the installation of curbing along the perimeter of any landscaping which adjoins vehicular use areas. 3 . The landscape plan does not appear to depict the landscaping for the entire property (see north property line). Revise the plan to depict all existing/proposed landscaping.. Further, as per CDC Section 2- 803.C.6.e, in order to form a cohesive, visually interesting and attractive appearance the proposed development shall provide for enhanced landscape design. Thus, it may be beneficial in achieveing compliance with this criterion for the existing landscaping along the north property line to be upgraded consistent with Code requirements. Parks and Recreation: No issues (commercial expansion - 35% increase). Stormwater: I . The following shall be addressed prior to Community. Development Board. 1. Provide water quality and attenuation for the redevelopment area. The design shall meet the City's criteria. The following shall be addressed at Building Permit Application. 1. Provide a copy of the approved SWFWMD permit or letter of exemption. Note: Addtional comments may be forthcoming based on the response to the above conditions. General note: 1. DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. Solid Waste: No Comments Traffic Engineering: I . 1. Provide required number of handicap parking spaces compliant with Florida Accessibility Code for Building Construction Chapter 11, Section 11- 4.1.2. 2. Provide handicap parking stall and sign details compliant with City. standards. 3. Provide an accessible path from a building's accessible entrance to a public . sidewalk compliant with Florida Accessibility Code for Building Construction Chapter 11, Section 11- 4.3.2. Planning: The above to be addressed prior to a Community. Development Board (CDB) hearing. General Note(s): 1) Applicant shall comply with the current Transportation Impact Fee Ordinance and fee schedule and paid prior to a Certificate of Occupancy (C.O.). 2) DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. Development Review Agenda - Thursday, May 1, 2008 - Page 3 DRC Anion A,-& 1.1 0 • BCP1999- 12578, which added a restroom, deck and 267 square foot second floor addition expired without a Certificate of Occupancy being issued. BCP2003- 02560, which was to obtain inspections for the aforementioned additions also expired without a Certificate of Occupancy being issued. These issues MUST be addressed as part of this approval (permits were associated with FLS 00- 01 -01). Pursuant to Community . Development Code (CDC) Section 2- 803.C.1, redevelopment as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project must otherwise be impractical without deviations from the development standards set forth in the zoning district. While a portion of the site exists with a zero -foot side (south) setback, the proposal would enlarge the area where this setback exists. As per the above, why must the proposed deck be constructed in the setback and adjacent to the property line? Further, the written response does not address the requested parking deviation. 3. Pursuant to CDC Section 2- 803.C.2, redevelopment shall be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan as well as the general purpose, intent and basic planning objectives of this Code and with the intent and purpose of the zoning district. The response provided with the application does not address these provisions and further does not address the requested deviations from the Code requirements. 4. Pursuant to CDC Section 2- 803.C.3, the redevelopment will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of surrounding properties. The response provided with the application is inaccurate as the proposal does extend on -site development past the currently developed limits. 5. Pursuant to CDC Section 2- 803.C.4, adjacent properties shall not suffer substantial detriment as a result of the proposed development. How does the location of a stage directly at the south property line not result in the potential detriment to the adjacent property. —6. Pursuant to CDC Section 2- 803.C.6.d, in order to form a cohesive, visually interesting and attractive appearance, the proposal incorporates a substantial number of design elements (see elements listed in Code). How does the proposal meet this criterion?. It would seem as if nothing is proposed to achieve compliance with this required element of the Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment application. 7. Pursuant to CDC Section 2- 803.C.6.e, the proposal shall provide for appropriate buffers, enhanced landscape design and appropriate distances between buildings. How does the construction of a deck/stage at a zero -foot setback from the south property line represent an appropriate distance from the adjacent building? How is an appropriate buffer provided? 8. Pursuant to CDC Section 3- 913.A.4, the proposal shall be designed to minimize traffic congestion. The written response provided with the application that "the proposed addition does not increase vehicle trips to the area" does not address the entire proposal, which eliminates the six existing parking spaces that serve the use as it presently exists. How does the creation of a greater parking demand coupled with the elimination of existing parking not increase traffic congestion? 9. Pursuant to CDC Section 3- 913.A.6, the design of the proposal shall minimize adverse effects, including visual, acoustic, olfactory and hours of operation impacts on adjacent properties. How will the expansion of the dining area (deck) at a zero -foot setback from the south property line and the addition of a stage also. at a zero-foot setback from the south property line not result in an adverse visual, acoustic, olfactory and hours of operation impact upon the adjacent,property? 10 . Provide the square footage of the Cooler, Freezer and the HW Pot Sink. 11 . What is the intended use of the stage? 12. The architectural site plan does not depict the rear sidewalks as they have been depicted on the civil plans. 13.. The architectural and civil site plans call for the existing deck to be extended to the west property line. However, the reduction of the required front setback to zero feet has not been included in the Description of Request in the application, and the written response to the General Applicability Criteria and the Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria do not address the requested reduction of the front (west) setback. 14. The architectural site plan calls for the enlargement of the existing entry. by +/- four feet. First, this is not depicted on the civil plans. Second, provide an exact dimension by which the entry is proposed to be enlarged. Third, provide architectural elevations that depict the change in appearance that this enlargement would bring. 15. Is the proposed deck to be covered? If either case, provide architectural elevations of the entire south elevation of the business. Development Review Agenda - Thursday, May 1, 2008 - Page 4 DRC Aaiun Agrn& 1.1 16 . The HW Pot Sink must be counted as part of the proposed new square footage. 17. With the inclusion of the new gate - how will solid waste pick -up occur? 18. The civil plans do not indicate what is to occur with all of the existing turf block parking. Clarify. 19. Provide architectural elevations that clearly depict how the new addition and new /expanded decks and entrance will relate to the existing building. 20. The proposed sliding gate would not appear to provide adequate clearance to allow vehicles to access the rear of the site. 21_ What does the proposed sliding gate connect to? According to the survey only a two -foot high concrete wall and the building itself are in the area of the gate. 22. According to the survey, there is a large area of turf block at the rear of the property that is for the existing parking spaces. The site plan does not propose the removal of all the turf block in conjunction with the elimination of the parking spaces. Revise the site and landscape plans. 23.. Clarify if "Building Area" as denoted in the Site Data Table represents the total square footage of the building (first floor, second floor, cooler, freezer - which it should) or only the building footprint. _ 24 . Parking Analysis; Section III; Friday, April 4, 2008: Clarify whether the low of 48 spaces . . occured at l OPM or 10 AM. 25. Pursuant to Parking Analysis; Section Ill; Customer Characteristics: Frenchy's South Beach is expected to experience a similar rate of walk -up customers to Frenchy's Rockaway / Post Comer Pizza and "it would be appropriate to reduce Frenchy's parking requirement based on a 50% walk -up rate ". While it may or may not be appropriate to "reduce ". the parking requirement by 50 %, the proposal would eliminate the parking requirement by 100 %, which is inconsistent with your customer characteristics. 26. Parking Analysis; Section IV; Future Conditions with Expansion: According to a strict interpretation of the Code the proposed restaurant would require 32 parking spaces, not between 15 and 32. Revise. 27. Pursuant to Parking Analysis; Section IV; Future Conditionw with Expansion, two existing parking spaces are'to be available to satisfy any additional demand created by the restaurant. Two points: first, the conclusion of this analysis states there will be no additional parking demand, so what additional demand does this section refer to? Second, the site plan proposes no parking spaces. 28. Pursuant to Parking Analysis; Section IV; Future Conditionw. with Expansion, "other than the hours of 12 Noon to 4PM on Saturday there are adequate existing parking spaces to support the expansion ". This would seem to indicate that during several peak business hours the proposed reduction in required off -street parking would not be favorable, which is inconsistent with the purpose of this analysis and your request. 29. Pursuant to Parking Analysis; Section V; Conclusion, "the expansion of Frenchy's South Beach Cafe is not expected to realistically create any additional parking demand due to the customer characteristics ".. The conclusion states there is an existing parking demand; however no findings are made to support the elimination of the existing parking for the existing restaurant. As such, the analysis fails to justify the reduction in parking for this proposal. parking analysis is unclear as to whether the estimated 50% walk -up rate for Frenchy's South Beach expected to continue following the construction of the proposed additions? 31. The parking analysis compares Frenchy's South Beach to two different businesses for the purpose of walk -up traffic comparisons and states that it is similar; however these similar businesses have an 1 l % disparity between them. Revise the analysis to better state the projected walk -up traffic for the subject use. 32. The Description of Request in the application as well as the Project Narrative provided state the building addition as being 560 square feet in size, which is inconsistent with the actual plans. Revise as appropriate. 33 . The Project Narrative submitted with the application states "the project also involves the removal of six (6) unused, substandard parking spaces located behind the building...'; however photographic evidence also submitted with the application depicts the parking as being used. These photographs are not only contrary to the statement made in the Narrative, but also contrary. to the application itself as it shows that the existing parking is utilized patrons and/or employees of the restaurant and is therefore clearly necessary. for the use. Other: No Comments Development Review Agenda - Thursday, May 1, 2008 - Page 5 DRC Action Ag-de 1.1 0 0 CITY OF CLEARWATER LL PLANNING. DEPARTMENT ° 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE ar ater CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 0 TEL: (727) 562 -4567 FAX: (727) 562 -4865 Date: To: From: Re: FACSIMILE. COVER SHEET April 29, 2008 Janet Baustert, (727) 446 -0588 Robert G. Tefft, Planner III FLD2008 -04009 / 351 S. Gulfview Boulevard Number of Pages Including Cover Sheet: 6 Comments: Please find attached the DRC comments for the above referenced project for the meeting of May 1, 2008. ** Please confirm receipt via e-mail at: roberl .tefft(a)myclearivater.com ** ** Visit the Planning Department online at www.mvclearuPater.com ** i + + Keith Zayac & Associates, Inc. 701 S. Enterprise Road E., Ste 404 Civil Engineering, Landscape Architecture, Planning Safety Harbor, FL 34695 (727) 793 -9888 Phone (727) 793 -9855 Fax keith(2ke ithMac. com EB 9351 LC26000212 April 14, 2008 Ms. Sherry Watkins City of Clearwater Planning Department 100 S. Myrtle Street Clearwater, FL 33756 RE: Frenchy's South Beach - Addition Flexible Development Application — Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Parking Analysis Ms. Watkins: Please find attached two (2) copies of the Parking Analysis for Frenchy's South Beach Cafe, 351 S. Gulfview Boulevard, Clearwater Beach, FL, prepared by Gulf Coast Consulting, Inc. This study is meant to supplement our April 1, 2008 Flexible Development Application submittal for an addition to Frenchy's South Beach Cafe. Please feel free to call me at (727) 793 -9888, ext. 307 if you have any questions or require additional information. Sincerely, Brian Wilkes Keith Zayac & Associates, Inc. ORWIM RECOAD APPS 11.2008 PLANN34G D;,Pikc'ZT RENT CITY OF GtEA!.NJA1ER PLANNING DEPARTMENT April 2, 2008 Mrs. Janet Baustert Frenchy's South Beach, Inc. 419 Eastshore Drive Clearwater, Florida 33767 C I TY OF C LEARWATE R POST OFFICE BOX 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758 -4748 MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562 -4567 FAX (727) 562 -4865 Re: FLD2008 -04009 1 351 S. Gulfview Boulevard I Letter of Incompleteness Dear Mrs. Baustert: The Planning Department staff has entered your application into the Department's filing system and assigned the case number FLD2008- 04009. After a preliminary review of the submitted documents, staff has determined that the application is incomplete with the following comment: El A parking demand study is required in conjunction with this request as the number of required parking spaces is being reduced. Pursuant to Section 4 -202 of the Community Development Code, if an application is deemed incomplete, the deficiencies of the application shall be specified by Staff and no further development review action shall be taken until those specified deficiencies are corrected and the application is deemed complete. Please resubmit revised plans and application materials as per the above comments no later than Noon, Thursday, April 10, 2008. Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, Robert G. Tefft, Planner III Tel: (727) 562 -4539 Fax: (727) 562 -4865 E -Mail: xobert. tefft @)inyclearivater. c0171 FRANK HIBBARD, MAYOR JOHN DORAN, COUNCILMEMBER J.B. JOHNSON, COUNCILMEMBER BILL JONSON, COUNCILMEMBER CARLEN A. PETERSEN, COUNCILMEMBER "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER" Keith Zajac & Associates, Inc. Civil Engineering, Landscape Architecture, Planning April 1, 2008 Ms. Sherry Watkins City of Clearwater Planning Department 100 S. Myrtle Street Clearwater, FL 33756 701 S. Enterprise Road E., Ste 404 Safety Harbor, FL 34695 (727) 793 -9888 Phone (727) 793 -9855 Fax keith@keithzgyac.com EB 9351 LC26000212 RE: Frenchy's South Beach - Addition Flexible Development Application — Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Ms. Watkins: Please find attached fifteen (15) sets of the following items in support of our Flexible Development Application for a building addition to the Frenchy's South Beach Restaurant: Attachments: • Flexible Development Application for Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, • Warranty Deed, ORONAL • Title Insurance Commitment, RECE • Color Photographs of existing site, • Civil Construction drawings (full size), APIR 0 12008 • Civil Construction drawings (8 1 /2" x 11 "), PLANNING MMUMENT • Boundary, Tree, and Topographical Survey, Cif 0 F -CiEA1 ATFR • Architectural Building Elevation Drawings (full size), • Architectural Building Elevation drawings (8 1/2" x 11 "), and • One (1) Check in the amount of $1,205 for Review Fees. Proiect Narrative: The Frenchy's South Beach Restaurant is located on a 0.15 acre parcel at 351 S. Gulfview Boulevard, Parcel No. 07/29/15/52380/000 /0700. The proposed project is an addition to this existing restaurant of 560 SF with modifications to the front/side deck. The project would involve the installation of new and upgraded landscaping, and a handicapped - accessible sidewalk. The project also involves the removal of six (6) unused, substandard parking spaces located behind the building, and the replacement of W_ 0 0 an after -hours access gate. Based on current trends and traffic, shared parking in the Beach Walk area accounts for all of Frenchy's business. The building addition is not intended to increase capacity. The kitchen area will be expanded to handle existing demands and current codes. The access to restrooms will also be relocated. Currently, patrons must walk through the kitchen area to access. All current Frenchy's themes will be mimicked in the proposed addition. Stormwater Narrative: There are no existing stormwater facilities on site. Roof runoff is directed to the inlets located in S. Gulfview Boulevard. The proposed addition will be directed likewise. Current drainage patterns will not be altered. The project will increase the building size by approximately 560 SF (footprint), but DECREASE overall impervious area by almost 500 SF. The proposed runoff will also be cleaner, as vehicular use area is being replaced by landscaping. Based on preliminary conversations with the City stormwater review staff, the decrease in impervious area combined with the City's overall improvements to the Beach Walk area and S. Gulfview Boulevard, no additional drainage facilities are required. Thank you for your time in the review and evaluation of the enclosed materials. I am available to you at (727) 793 -9888, ext. 307 if there are any questions or concerns with this application. Sincerely, Brian Wilkes Keith Zayac & Associates, Inc. Mjf APR 01 2008 PLANNVAi l�•:r•�� ,��� 1_ 0 CDB Meeting Date: April 21, 2009 Case Number: FLD2008 -04009 Agenda Item: E. 3. Owner: Michael Preston Applicant: Frenchy's South Beach, Inc. Representative: Janet Baustert Address: 351 South Gulfview Boulevard CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT GENERAL INFORMATION: REQUEST: Flexible Development approval to permit a 228 square foot building addition and a 1,033 square foot deck expansion for an existing restaurant within the Tourist (T) District with a front (west) setback of zero feet (to building), a side (south) setback of zero feet (to building /pavement), a side (north) setback of 15.91 feet (to building) and 5 feet (to pavement), and a rear (east) setback of 42 feet (to building) and zero feet (to pavement); a building height of 22 feet; and 5 off - street parking spaces as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Community Development Code Section 2- 803.C; and a reduction to the required foundation landscaping along South Gulfview Boulevard from five to zero feet as part of a Comprehensive Landscape Program, under the provisions of Community Development Code Section 3- 1202.G. CURRENT ZONING: CURRENT FUTURE LAND USE CATEGORY: PROPERTY USE: Tourist (T) District Resort Facilities High (RFH) Current Use: Restaurant Proposed Use: Restaurant EXISTING North: Tourist (T) District SURROUNDING South: Tourist (T) District ZONING AND USES: East: Tourist (T) District West: Tourist (T) District ANALYSIS: Site Location and Existing Conditions: Restaurant Overnight Accommodations Overnight Accommodations and Restaurant (vacant) Beach Walk/ Clearwater Beach The 0.15 -acre subject property is located on the east side of South Gulfview Boulevard approximately 60 feet north of Fifth Street, which is within the "Beach Walk" District of Beach by Design. The site is currently developed with a two -story 2,071 square foot restaurant (Frenchy's South Beach Cafe), as well as a nonconforming 6 -space off - street parking area at the rear of the property. Community Development Board — April 21, 2009 FLD2008 -04009 — Page 1 0 0 Development Proposal: On April 1, 2008, an application for a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project was submitted and over the course of its review the scope of the application has changed more than once. Presently, the development proposal consists of the following: ❑ Construction of a 228 square foot restroom addition at the southeast corner of the existing building; ❑ Extension of the existing wood deck adjacent to the aforementioned addition, including the construction of a handicap accessible ramp; ❑ Extension of the existing 37 -foot wide wood deck between one and two feet toward the front of the property; and ❑ Re- stripe the existing, nonconforming six -space off - street parking area at the rear of the property to provide for five conforming parking spaces. The proposed restroom addition will solve an existing problem for the restaurant in that customers are required to walk through the kitchen in order to access the existing restrooms. The new restrooms would be accessed via the proposed deck extension along the south property line while the existing restrooms would be converted into storage area for the kitchen. In order to accommodate the proposed addition, the existing handicap accessible parking space must be relocated. However, the existing off - street parking area is presently nonconforming with regard to insufficient drive aisle and parking space widths. With this proposal, the off - street parking area will be redesigned so that all parking spaces meet the minimum dimensional requirements. The development proposal's compliance with the various development standards of the Community Development Code (CDC) is discussed below. Floor Area Ratio (FAR): Pursuant to CDC Section 2- 801.1, the maximum allowable FAR within the Resort Facilities High (RFH) Future Land Use category is 1.0. As proposed, the development will have an FAR of 0.35, which meets the above requirement. Impervious Surface Ratio (ISR): Pursuant to CDC Section 2.801.1, the maximum allowable ISR within the RFH Future Land Use Category is 0.95. As per the site data table, the proposal has an ISR of 0.95, which meets the above requirement. Minimum Lot Area / Width: Pursuant to CDC Table 2 -803, the minimum lot area for restaurants ranges between 5,000 and 10,000 square feet. The subject property is 6,603.14 square feet in area. Pursuant to the same Table, the minimum lot width for restaurants may range between 50 and 100 feet. The lot width of this site along South Gulfview Boulevard is 60 feet. Based upon the above, the proposal is consistent with these Code provisions. Maximum Building Height: Pursuant to CDC Table 2 -803, the maximum allowable height for restaurants ranges between 25 and 100 feet. The existing building height is 22 feet to the mid -point of its pitched roof. The height of the building addition is proposed at approximately 9.51 feet to its standing seam flat roof, which will snatch the existing standing seam pitched found on the balance of the building. Minimum Setbacks: Pursuant to CDC Table 2 -803, the minimum front setback for restaurants may range between zero and 15 feet, the minimum side setback may range between zero and 10 feet and the minimum rear setback may range between 10 and 20 feet. The proposal consists of a front (west) setback of zero feet (to proposed deck expansion), a side (north) setback of 15.91 feet (to existing building) and Community Development Board — April 21, 2009 FLD2008 -04009 — Page 2 five feet (to existing pavement), a side (south) setback of zero feet (to existing building /pavement), and a rear (east) setback of 42 feet (to existing building) and zero feet (to proposed pavement). The majority of the requested setbacks are for existing conditions on the property; however there are a few setbacks that pertain to new improvements on the property. The existing 37 -foot wide, first floor wood deck at the west side (front) of the property is presently set back between one and two feet from the property line and will be brought forward to a zero -foot setback. While this does result in a loss of foundation landscaping (a deviation from the landscape requirements discussed later in this staff report), the result is a design that supports the established and desired character of the area. While there is already an existing wood deck at a zero -foot setback along the south property line, the proposal will add a small extension to this deck as well as a new handicap accessible ramp leading to the relocated handicap accessible parking space at the rear of the property. The proposal will also expand the existing building by 228 square feet to accommodate new restrooms for the restaurant. The restrooms will be set back five feet from the south property line. and will be accessed by the aforementioned deck expansion. As mentioned previously in the discussion on building height, this addition has been designed so as to be cohesive with the existing architecture, and the design is consistent with the established character of the area. With regard to the existing off - street parking area at the rear (east side) of the property, there is presently a four -foot set back from the property line to the pavement. However, this existing parking area is presently nonconforming and in order to bring the parking up to Code requirements this setback will need to be eliminated. While pavement is being extended into the existing setback area, this is only to accommodate the required handicap accessible parking space and its associated access panel. The additional further encroachment into the existing setback area will only be done by turf block and wheel stops for the four standard parking spaces so as not to overly disturb the roots of the existing trees on the adjacent property. Minimum Off - Street Parking: Pursuant to CDC Table 2 -803, the minimum off - street parking requirement for restaurants may range between seven and 15 parking spaces per 1,000 square feet of gross floor area (GFA), or between 16 and 34 parking spaces based upon the proposed addition. The existing restaurant is presently deficient with regard to its required parking as it has only six parking spaces. Further, these six parking spaces are nonconforming as they typically do not meet the minimum required width and are accessed via a drive aisle with an inadequate width. With this proposal this drive aisle and six existing nonconforming parking spaces will be replaced with a drive aisle and five parking spaces that will conform to dimensional requirements. While the off - street parking being provided, this proposal is well short of what would typically be required for a restaurant of this size, there is inadequate property available to provide additional parking to what already exists, and this proposal will substantially improve those existing parking spaces. Further, the proposed addition will not generate any further demand for parking, as it is not increasing the restaurant's seating capacity, but instead providing for new restrooms that will not need to be accessed through the kitchen. Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project Criteria: Pursuant to CDC Section 2 -803, the uses allowed within the Tourist (T) District are subject to compliance with specific flexibility criteria. The following table depicts the consistency of the development proposal with these flexibility criteria as per CDC Section 2 -803.0 (Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project): Community Development Board — April 21, 2009 FLD2008 -04009 — Page 3 1] • Permitted Encroachments Into Setbacks and Over Street Rights -of -Way: Pursuant to CDC Section 3- 908.A. 1, building projections that are affixed solely to the building and not directly to the ground such as awnings shall be permitted to encroach a maximum of ten feet into the otherwise required setback and over street rights -of -way provided a clearance of nine feet over grade is maintained. In no case shall such projection be closer than five feet from the curb or the shoulder of the roadway. The development proposal includes the installation of a new awning along the front edge of the existing building. The Community Development Board — April 21, 2009 FLD2008 -04009 — Page 4 Consistent Inconsistent 1. The development or redevelopment is otherwise impractical without deviations from X the use and /or development standards set forth in this zoning district. 2. The development or redevelopment will be consistent with the goals and policies of X the Comprehensive Plan, as well as with the general purpose, intent and basic planning objectives of this Code, and with the intent and purpose of this zoning district. 3. The development or redevelopment will not impede the normal and orderly X development and improvement of surrounding properties. 4. Adjoining properties will not suffer substantial detriment as a result of the proposed X development 5. The proposed use shall otherwise be permitted by the underlying future land use X category, be compatible with adjacent land uses, will not substantially alter the essential use characteristics of the neighborhood; and shall demonstrate compliance with one or more of the following objectives: a. The proposed use is permitted in this zoning district as a minimum standard, flexible standard or flexible development use; b. The proposed use would be a significant economic contributor to the City's economic base by diversifying the local economy or by creating jobs; c. The development proposal accommodates the expansion or redevelopment of an existing economic contributor; d. The proposed use provides for the provision of affordable housing; e. The proposed use provides for development or redevelopment in an area that is characterized by other similar development and where a land use plan amendment and rezoning would result in a spot land use or zoning designation; or f. The proposed use provides for the development of a new and /or preservation of a working waterfront use. 6. Flexibility with regard to use, lot width, required setbacks, height and off - street X parking are justified based on demonstrated compliance with all of the following design objectives: a. The proposed development will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of the surrounding properties for uses permitted in this zoning district; b. The proposed development complies with applicable design guidelines adopted by the City; c. The design, scale and intensity of the proposed development supports the established or emerging character of an area; d. In order to forni a cohesive,. visually interesting and attractive appearance, the proposed development incorporates a substantial number of the following design elements: • Changes in horizontal building planes; • Use of architectural details such as columns, cornices, stringcourses, pilasters, porticos, balconies, railings, awnings, etc.; ❑ Variety in materials, colors and textures; ❑ Distinctive fenestration patterns; ❑ Building stepbacks; and Cl Distinctive roofs forms. e. The proposed development provides for appropriate buffers, enhanced landscape design and appropriate distances between buildings. Permitted Encroachments Into Setbacks and Over Street Rights -of -Way: Pursuant to CDC Section 3- 908.A. 1, building projections that are affixed solely to the building and not directly to the ground such as awnings shall be permitted to encroach a maximum of ten feet into the otherwise required setback and over street rights -of -way provided a clearance of nine feet over grade is maintained. In no case shall such projection be closer than five feet from the curb or the shoulder of the roadway. The development proposal includes the installation of a new awning along the front edge of the existing building. The Community Development Board — April 21, 2009 FLD2008 -04009 — Page 4 0 • awning appears to project approximately two feet from the building, which would result in an encroachment into the right -of -way for South Gulfview Boulevard. While it appears that this encroachment will comply with all of the above requirements, it is attached as a condition of approval that prior to the issuance of any building permits, further details and dimensions for the proposed awning must be provided and must comply with the above referenced requirements. Landscaping Pursuant to CDC Section 3- 1202.E.2, foundation plantings shall be required for 100 percent of a building fagade with frontage along a street right -of -way within a minimum five -foot wide landscaped area composed of at least two accent trees or three palms for every 40 linear feet of building fagade and one shrub for every 20 square feet of required landscape area. The existing building fronts on South Gulfview Boulevard and there is presently a setback of between one and two feet from the abutting property line where a small and nonconforming foundation planting area exists. The proposal seeks to eliminate this foundation planting area and replace it with an expanded wood deck. Comprehensive Landscape Program: Pursuant to CDC Section 3- 1202.G, the landscaping requirements contained within the Code can be waived or modified if the application contains a Comprehensive Landscape Program satisfying certain criteria. The following table depicts the consistency of the development proposal with those criteria: The proposal has been found to be consistent with the above requirements, but specifically with regard to criterion l.b, the size of the existing foundation landscape area makes it impossible to plant the accent trees or palms required by this provision and realistically there is inadequate room to plant the required shrubs /hedge material and maintain it in a manner that would result in vibrant and healthy plant material. At this point, it seems more beneficial to the overall appearance of the site to have no foundation landscaping rather than foundation landscaping that is poor in its appearance. Based upon the above, it seems appropriate to allow for the elimination of the existing foundation planting area along South Gulfview Boulevard. Code Enforcement Analysis: There are no outstanding Code Enforcement issues associated with the subject property. Community Development Board — April 21, 2009 FLD2008 -04009 — Page 5 Consistent Inconsistent 1. Architeclural thence: a. The landscaping in a comprehensive landscape program shall be designed as a N/A N/A part of the architectural theme of the principle buildings proposed or developed on the parcel proposed for development; or b. The design, character, location and /or materials of the landscape treatment X proposed in the comprehensive landscape program shall be demonstrably more attractive than landscaping otherwise permitted on the parcel proposed for development under the minimum landscape standards. 2. Lighting: Any lighting proposed as a part of a comprehensive landscape program is X automatically controlled so that the lighting is turned off when the business is closed. 3. Community character: The landscape treatment proposed in the comprehensive X landscape program will enhance the community character of the City of Clearwater. 4. Property values: The landscape treatment proposed in the comprehensive landscape X program will have a beneficial impact on the value of property in the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. 5. Special area or scenic corridor plan: The landscape treatment proposed in the X comprehensive landscape program is consistent with any special area or scenic corridor plan which the City of Clearwater has prepared and adopted for the area in which the parcel proposed for development is located. The proposal has been found to be consistent with the above requirements, but specifically with regard to criterion l.b, the size of the existing foundation landscape area makes it impossible to plant the accent trees or palms required by this provision and realistically there is inadequate room to plant the required shrubs /hedge material and maintain it in a manner that would result in vibrant and healthy plant material. At this point, it seems more beneficial to the overall appearance of the site to have no foundation landscaping rather than foundation landscaping that is poor in its appearance. Based upon the above, it seems appropriate to allow for the elimination of the existing foundation planting area along South Gulfview Boulevard. Code Enforcement Analysis: There are no outstanding Code Enforcement issues associated with the subject property. Community Development Board — April 21, 2009 FLD2008 -04009 — Page 5 i • COMPLIANCE WITH STANDARDS AND CRITERIA: The following table depicts the consistency of the development proposal with the standards and criteria as per CDC Sections 2 -801.1 and 2 -803: See above discussion with regard to Minimum Lot Area / Width. z See above discussion with regard to Minimum Setbacks. 3 See above discussion with regard to Minimum Off-Street Parking. COMPLIANCE WITH GENERAL STANDARDS FOR LEVEL TWO APPROVALS: The following table depicts the consistency of the development proposal with the General Standards for Level Two Approvals as per CDC Section 3- 913.A: Standard Existing / Proposed Consistent inconsistent Floor Area Ratio 1.0 0.35 X 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage development and use of Impervious Surface Ratio 0.95 0.95 X Minimum Lot Area 5,000 — 10,000 square feet 6,603.14 square feet X Minimum Lot Width 50 — 100 feet 60 feet X1 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the Maximum 'Building Height 25 — 100 feet 18 feet X Minimum Setbacks Front: 0 — 15 feet West: Zero feet (to building) Xz Side: 0— 10 feet North: 15.91 feet (to building) Xz 5 feet (to pavement) South: Zero feet (to building) X2 Zero feet (to pavement) Rear: 10 — 20 feet East: 42 feet (to building) XZ Zero feet (to pavement) Minimum Off- Street 34 parking spaces :5 parking spaces X3 Parkin (15 / 1,000 GFA See above discussion with regard to Minimum Lot Area / Width. z See above discussion with regard to Minimum Setbacks. 3 See above discussion with regard to Minimum Off-Street Parking. COMPLIANCE WITH GENERAL STANDARDS FOR LEVEL TWO APPROVALS: The following table depicts the consistency of the development proposal with the General Standards for Level Two Approvals as per CDC Section 3- 913.A: SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION: The Development Review Committee (DRC) reviewed the application and supporting materials at its meetings of May 1 and August 7, 2008, and deemed the development proposal to be legally sufficient to move forward to the Community Development Board (CDB). Findings of Fact. The Planning Department, having reviewed all evidence submitted by the applicant and requirements of the Community Development Code, finds that there is substantial competent evidence to support the following findings of fact: Community Development Board — April 21, 2009 FLD2008 -04009 — Page 6 Consistent Inconsistent 1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, X coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage development and use of X adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons X residing or working in the neighborhood. 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. X 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the X immediate vicinity. 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including X visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts on adjacent properties. SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION: The Development Review Committee (DRC) reviewed the application and supporting materials at its meetings of May 1 and August 7, 2008, and deemed the development proposal to be legally sufficient to move forward to the Community Development Board (CDB). Findings of Fact. The Planning Department, having reviewed all evidence submitted by the applicant and requirements of the Community Development Code, finds that there is substantial competent evidence to support the following findings of fact: Community Development Board — April 21, 2009 FLD2008 -04009 — Page 6 I . That the 0.15 -acre subject property is located on the east side of South Gulfview Boulevard, approximately 60 feet north of Fifth Street; 2. That the subject property is located within the Tourist (T) District and the Resort Facilities High (RFH) Future Land Use Plan category; 3. That the subject property is located within the special area redevelopment plan, Beach by Design, as part of the "Beach Walk" district; 4. That the existing development is presently nonconforming with respect to both minimum setback and off - street parking requirements; and 5. That the proposal consists of a 228 square foot restroom addition for an existing restaurant as well as minor expansions to the existing wood deck and the reconfiguration of the off - street parking area to meet dimensional requirements. Conclusions of Law. The Planning Department, having made the above findings of fact, reaches the following conclusions of law: 1. That the development proposal has been found to be in compliance with the applicable Standards and Criteria as per CDC Sections 2 -801.1 and 2 -803; 2. That the development proposal has been found to be in compliance with the Flexibility criteria for a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project as per CDC Section 2- 803.C; 3. That the development proposal has been found to be in compliance with the General Standards for Level Two Approvals as per CDC Section 3- 913.A; and 4. That the development proposal has been found to be in compliance with the Comprehensive Landscape Program criteria as per CDC Section 3- 1202.G. Based upon the above, the Planning Department recommends APPROVAL of the Flexible Development approval to permit a 228 square foot building addition and a 1,033 square foot deck expansion for an existing restaurant within the Tourist (T) District with a front (west) setback of zero feet (to building), a side (south) setback of zero feet (to building/pavement), a side (north) setback of 15.91 feet (to building) and 5 feet (to pavement), and a rear (east) setback of 42 feet (to building) and zero feet (to pavement); a building height of 22 feet; and 5 off - street parking spaces as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Community Development Code Section 2- 803.C; and a reduction to the required foundation landscaping along South Gulfview Boulevard from five to zero feet as part of a Comprehensive Landscape Program, under the provisions of Community Development Code Section 3- 1202.G, with the following conditions: Conditions of Approval: 1. That prior to the issuance of any building permits, any outstanding comments of the Engineering Department shall be addressed; 2. That prior to the issuance of any building permits, any outstanding comments of the Fire Department shall be addressed; 3. That the Legal Description set forth on the Cover Sheet be revised to reflect the correct property; 4. That the General Site Notes set forth on the Site, Grading and Drainage Plan be revised to reflect the correct architect of record ( #3) and the correct total square footage and parking requirement ( #17), as well as striking note #14 and #16; 5. That a prior permit (BCP1999 -12578 or BCP2003- 02560) be reactivated or a new permit be applied for so that the previously constructed restroom addition, deck and 267 square foot second floor addition as previously approved under FLS 00- 01 -01, may be inspected and completed; and Community Development Board — April 21, 2009 FLD2008 -04009 — Page 7 0 • 6. That the final design and color of the building shall be consistent with the architectural elevations approved by the CDB. Prepared by Planning Department Staff: Robert G. Tefft, Development Review Manager ATTACHMENTS: Location Map; Aerial Map; Zoning Map; Existing Surrounding Uses Map; and Photographs of Site and Vicinity S: (Planning Deparhnent I C D BIFLEX (FLD) I Pending eases) Up for the next CDBI Gulfview S 0351 Frenchy s (T) 2009.04 - Pending - RTStaff Report 2009 04- 21.doc Community Development Board — April 21, 2009 FLD2008 -04009 — Page 8 0 Robert G. Tefft 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, Florida 33756 (727) 562 -4539 robert.tefftnn,myclearwater.com • PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE ❑ Development Review Manager City of Clearwater, Clearwater, Florida August 2008 to Present Manage and supervise five planners and two land resource specialists. Represent the department at Community Development Board and City Council meetings, and the City at meetings of Pinellas Planning Council and Countywide Planning Authority as well as other public bodies as needed. ❑ Planner III City of Clearwater, Clearwater, Florida June 2005 to August 2008 Performed technical reviews and prepared of staff reports for various land development applications. Organized data and its display in order to track information and provide status reports. Made presentations to various City Boards and Committees. ❑ Planner II City of Clearwater, Clearwater, Florida May 2005 to June 2005 Performed technical reviews and prepared of staff reports for various land development applications. Organized data and its display in order to track information and provide status reports. ❑ Assistant Planner I Planner I Senior Planner City of Delray Beach, Delray Beach, Florida October 1999 to May 2005 Performed technical reviews and prepared staff reports for land development applications such as, but not limited to: site plans, conditional uses, rezonings, land use amendments, and text amendments. Performed reviews of building permit applications. Organized data and its display in order to track information and provide status reports. Made presentations to various City Boards. Provided in -depth training to the Assistant Planner position with respect to essential job functions and continuous guidance. Provided information on land use applications, ordinances, land development regulations, codes, and related planning programs /services to other professionals and the public. EDUCATION ❑ Bachelor of Arts, Geography (Urban Studies), University of South Florida, 1999 LICENSES & CERTIFICATES ❑ American Planning Association Community Development Board — April 21, 2009 FLD2008 -04009 — Page 9 • a h z Pier 60 O c Causeway Blvd >; z, FIRST PROJECT m� ST SITE ° SECOND 0 ST DR THIRD 3 ST w 0 ° ° � z 0 ir 0 Ua BRIGHT WATER DR IFTH Sr vi 2 W BAYSIDE C, BAYwAY s � �k 40 k SN A LOCATION MAP Owner: Michael Preston Case: FLD2008 -04009 Site: 351 South Gulfview Boulevard Property Size: 0.15 acres PIN: 07- 29 -15- 52380- 000 -0700 Atlas Page: 276A • • a44 k �" iTw OF s M 14 1 Fa � Sx z a: t Ir Ol ! "w"; Fl, V- it r�— AERIAL MAF Owner: !Michael Pre :Jon Case: FLD2308 -04005 S te: a51 S•Djth G il- ew Bovevard Property Size: 0.15 acres P N: C7-25 5- 529) -)00 -070) Atlas Pcge: 276A z • — — I � 305 , N 30 305 2 1 14 60 ` — — — 309 309 t5 31161 108 312 ° a — — 315 — J 109 316 16 3154 �71 — — 319LD�j-R T 6 r_ � _ 110 320 _ 5L — — 18 -`_i 8 1_1 =26 VD CD �23 �3z 16 ` — 64 j L J6 P _ ` ' 9 332 25 '7 2 = — 3A ` - — 32565 113 20 ` — — — — 114 so 4 330 1 J8 r- 659 4A _ — 66 '— — — 70 3339 5 332 � _ 21 — 333 115 — — — — _QS /R 67 ` — 10 6 — — 33§7 ' 56 116 T — 22 — 347 — l — ^, 1 o P— — — — 68 117 — 341 — — - - 23 347 ` — 69 118 34311 342 7 — — 34512 — 4— 351 119 — 70 348 Q 9 "1 E8 346 h 345 1 932 — 25 — — O § L IInFO- — 70 2 3 — — — 35571 120 _ 353 13 g 34 so 5 — 26 FIFTH ST — — 0 14 10 A 350 P — 261/2 401 — — — 72 121 �% OA r- _ 27 — ` ,% — — 401 17640 1 1 — — _ — — 409LDC7R -2 77gg— 406 9 r- _ 28 411 40-52 —2 — 1 -A 11 88438 .� 74_ — — 75 124 409 3 29 ._ — _ � — — _ �� 'Q 10 410 1` 1 2 — — — — — — 410 76 125 15 17g % — — �g 420 o 0 30 — — 4 — — — — 41 126 Q B Z A S /DE DI? — — — 42177 5 8 420 415 31 — — — — — 431 78 127 420 / 2 — — 430 6 32 43199 128 422 4 ?1 3 1 2 — ' 80 129 3 33 430 1 81 43 60 17640 ZONING MAP Owner: Michael Preston Case: FLD2008 -04009 Site: 351 South Gulfview Boulevard Property Size: 0.15 acres PIN: 07- 29 -15- 52380 - 000 -0700 Atlas Page: 276A 0 _ 35 _ — — — — 70 1 305 � 30 - - 3052 1 — — _ 14 RE 60RA� _ — 309 — — _ - BEACFLWALK 31161 11_a 31z 3 _ — s 315 109 316 — 3191,&TR _ ale 16 — 17 I— 110 320 Sz380 1- OVER '�! 63 1DATI 6 C, 0 2A _ 18 ____j — A CO—m S — _ 1 64 132316 J26 — 19 332 — — — 25 J7 _ �"`�i 1� 3 3A 32565 113 20 — — E.RhUgW — 114 so a 330 ° 4A L 59 — AC ill O f'�► ,�_I G 1$T 332 70 I _ 115 5 21 333 -_ 67 AC 10 TION 3,V 156 116- 22 347 — to ro \ — — — 68 117 341 N o — _3 ` R S'/�.1 R NT 34,1 7 342 _ _ 1 _ 34512 a 351 70 119 348 0 '411-546 345 ^ ^ o 1 — 932 _ Q _ 3551 20 Z 353 13 9 3 so 45 — z6 F/F O THST O a o A 350 _ _ - , e O z` 1/2 4pptiVE R Njz� A — 72 27 CCfbfflAMq -PAT NS 401 17640 — — _ — 4091d&7.7j _ 12 406 r— — 28 411 4052 1 -A 88438 _1 BE29 WALK 7s 11za A ONIM DlATI - - - - -- 41 OVE#ZtJIQWT 15176 _1 Q ^ 9 2 ^ _ 30— _ _ - 412 N;AC OZMgDP6TIO S a 420 ZQ Bq �'S /ptcDR - _ G 5 8 420 415 31 r 127 420 431 78 � 2 0 ^ — m BTA AN -F3 422 6 G 421 3 1 2 32 i < i 1 3 80 129 4�3 r 1 33 / 430 10 81 431 —� so 17640 EXISTING SURROUNDING USES MAP Owner: Michael Preston Case: FLD2008 -04009 Site: 351 South Gulfview Boulevard Property Size: 0.15 acres PIN: 07- 29 -15- 52380 - 000 -0700 Atlas Page: 276A Looking southeast from S. Gulfview- Boulevard toward subject property. building. k building where proposed addition wil be constructed. n 1�..J e i. Y. Looking ea,t from S. Gulfviev Boulevard toward subject property. Looking west from the parking area toward the rear of the building. r _ i Looking northwest from the parking area at rear of and parking area. 351 S. Gulfview Boulevard FLD2008 -04009 E Map Request Planner Name: Robert Tefft Case Number: FLD2008 -04009 Date Requested: March 20, 2009 Date Requested for (date): March 27, 2009 Maps Requested ® Location Map ® Aerial Map ® Zoning Map ® Existing Surrounding Uses Map Required Documents to be submitted to Engineering ® Legal Description ® Survey ® Map with Proposed Site Highlighted ' IN ADDITION TO THE REQUESTED MAPS, PLEASE PROVIDE VERIFICATION THAT THE LEGAL DESCRIPTION WE HAVE PROVIDED IS CORRECT AND ACCURATE. Map Name Owner: Michael Preston Case: FLD2008 -04009 Site: 351 South Gulfview Boulevard Property Size: 0.15 acres PIN: 07 -29 -15 -52380 - 000 -0700 Atlas Page: 276A 9 0 GvH Coast Consulting, Inc. ORIGINAL, RECEIVED mAR 15 2009 PLANE lO; '' CRY OF CLEARWA04M PARKING ANALYSIS FOR FRENCHYY'S SOUTH BEACH CAFE 351 S. GULFVIEW BOULEVARD CLEARWAI'ER BEACH, FLORIDA IDA PREPARED FOR: FRENCHY' S SOUTH BEACH, INC. PREPARED BY: GULF COAST CONSULTING, INC. DEVISED JULY 2008 PROJECT # 08 -023 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION IL METHODOLOGY III. EXISTING CONDITIONS ANALYSIS IV. FUTURE CONDITIONS WITH EXPANSION V. CONCLUSION I. INTRODUCTION Frenchy's South Beach Caf6 contains 1,567 square feet of building space and the applicant plans an expansion of 548 square feet to the restaurant located at #351 ' South Gulfview Boulevard (See Figure 1). The restaurant is a free - standing building on a 0.15 acre site that contains six (6) on -site parking spaces and a bicycle rack and therefore will be dependent upon available public parking. The ' site is located in the Tourist (T) zoning district; and per Section 2 -802 of the Community Development Code has a minimum parking requirement of 7 spaces to 15 spaces per 1,000 square feet. According to strict interpretation of the code, ' the expanded restaurant would require a minimum of 15 parking spaces to a maximum of 32 parking spaces. The applicant believes the actual parking demand 1 is much lower than code requirements due to unique circumstances. THIS PALING ANALYSIS WAS REVISED TO RESPOND TO QUESTIONS RAISED AT THE MAY 1, 2008 DRC MEETING AND PROVIDE ' ADDITIONAL INFORMATION PER AGREEMENTS REACHED AT THE JUNE 9, 2008 MEETING WITH PUBLIC WORKS /TRAFFIC AND PARKING STAFF. AS A RESULT THE APPLICANT HAS REVISED THE 1 SITE PLAN TO INCLUDE ONE HANDICAPPED SPACE ON -SITE. The code provides for reducing the required number of parking spaces to recognize the special situations that exist on Clearwater Beach. Section 2 -802 of the Community Development Code allows a reduction in parking if the property will require fewer parking spaces per floor area than otherwise required or ' adequate parking is available through existing or planned and committed parking facilities within 1,000 feet of the property. ' City of Clearwater staff has recognized the restaurant will be located in close proximity to Clearwater Beach, hotels, and condominium developments with a great potential for "walk -up" customers. Staff also .recognizes the available public parking in nearby lots serves two functions, one to serve beachgoers, and two to provide parking for beach related businesses. The applicant believes the addition to this small restaurant would not significantly alter parking demand and adequate ' parking exists within reasonable distance to support the restaurant expansion. In addition, the reconstruction of South Gulfview Boulevard, Coronado Drive, and the construction of Beachwalk to be completed this Summer will create on- street ' parking spaces. This parking analysis was prepared to determine the availability of parking spaces. II. METHODOLOGY Prior to conducting this analysis a methodology was established with the City of Clearwater staff. It was agreed GCC would conduct a parking accumulation study on a Friday between the hours of 6 PM - 10 PM and Saturday between the hours of 10 AM — 4 PM and 6 PM — 10 PM. The study area included Frenchy's lot, ' Municipal Lot # 32S, Municipal Lot # 33, Municipal Lot # 62S, and Municipal Lot #62N. These areas include a total of 206 existing parking spaces. IIIo EXISTING CONDITIONS ANALYSIS Existing conditions were established by conducting parking lot counts between the hours of 6:00 PM and 10:00 PM on Friday April 4th and 10:00 AM to 4:00 PM and 6:00 PM — 10:00 PM on Saturday April 5th 2008. This represented the ' final weekend of Spring Break for Pinellas County schools and it was assumed this represents above average conditions. Friday's weather conditions were normal for early April with sunny skies and a high temperature of 85 degrees with evening temperatures in the low 70s. Saturday's conditions were partly cloudy skies with high temperatures in the 80s, and rain occurred after 8 PM. The ' aforementioned parking areas were checked on the hour for the number of spaces that were occupied. The number of occupied spaces was noted and an hourly accumulated total was obtained for each specific parking area and the whole study area. The main public parking facilities serving the southern part Clearwater Beach include Lot 32S with 72 spaces, Lot 33 with 25 spaces, Lot 62S with 36 spaces and Lot 62N with 67 spaces. All parking areas studied are within a 1,000 foot radius of the site as prescribed by code. ' FridayApril 4, 2008 1 Parking demand varied significantly throughout the evening with a low of 48 occupied spaces (23 %) at 10 PM to a peak demand of 136 occupied spaces (66 %) at 6 PM. As such, there were a minimum of 70 unused spaces in the study area ' throughout the day. Closer analysis shows Lot 932S was underutilized as was Lot 62N. Table 1 provides an hourly tabulation and Figure 2 provides a graph of hourly parking space occupancy. 1 Saturday April 5, 2008 Parking demand on Saturday was consistently higher than Friday evening. Parking demand varied from a low of 12 occupied spaces (6 %) at 10 PM to a peak demand of 204 occupied spaces (99 %) at 4 PM. Parking demand reached 97 % at 12 Noon and remained almost fully occupied until 4 PM. As such, there were only 2 unused spaces at the peak hour of the day. Table 2 provides an hourly tabulation and Figure 3 provides a graph of hourly parking space occupancy. TIME 6:00 PM 7:00 PM 8:00 PM 9:00 PM 10:00 PM FRENCHYS LOT CITY LOT 32S CITY LOT 33 CITY LOT 62S CITY LOT 62N TOTAL EXISTING OCC. TOTAL OCC. TOTAL OCC. TOTAL OCC. TOTAL OCC. TOTAL OCC. TOTAL % OCCUPIED 2 6 54 72 14 25 20 36 46 67 136 - 206 66% 2 6 49 72 12 25 32 36 24 67 119 206 58% 1 6 57 72 21 25 33 36 13 67 125 206 61% 1 6 39 72 16 25 - 24 36 2 67 82 206 40% 2 6 25 72 4 25 16 36 1 67 48 206 23% 220 200 180 160 U) 140 w V Q CL 120 O w CL 100 v U 0 80 60 40 20 0 6:00 PM FIGURE 2 - FRIDAY APRIL 4, 2008 7:00 PM 8:00 PM 9:00 PM 10:00 PM TIME OF DAY --*— series I� TIME 10:00 AM 11:00 AM 12:00 NOOP 1:00 PM 2:00 PM 3:00 PM 4:00 PM 6:00 PM 7:00 PM 8.00 PM 9 0 PM 10:00 PM FRENCHYS LOT CITY LOT 32S CITY LOT 33 CITY LOT 62S CITY LOT 62N TOTAL EXISTING OCC. TOTAL OCC. TOTAL OCC. TOTAL OCC. TOTAL OCC. TOTAL OCC. TOTAL % OCCUPIED 0 6 40 72 0 25 2- 36 33 67 75 206 36% 2 - 6 72 72 9 25 32 36 65 67 180 206 87% 1 6 72 72 24 25 36 36 66 67 199 206 97% 1 6 72 72 25 25 36 36 67 67 201 206 98% 1 6 72 72 25 25 - 35 36 67 67 200 206 97% 2 . - 6 72 72 25 25 - 35 - 36- - 67 67 201 206 98% 4 6 72 72 25 25 36 36 67 67 204 206 99% 1 6 68 72 24 25 34 36 50 1 67 177 1 206 86% 1 6 69 72 22 25 M 36 - 45 67 171 206 83% 2 6 68 72 18 25 25 36 16 §Z 129 206 63% 3. 6 24 72 3 25 4 36 5 67 39 206 19% 2 6 7 72 1 25 2 36 0 67 12 206 6% FIGURE 3 - SATURDAY APRIL 5, 2008 220 - W 200 - v 180 - Q 160 - co 140 � 120 � 0 Series1 w 100 E 80 V 60 V 40 - O 20 - 0 oP oP O� oQ oQ oQ oQ oQ oQ oQ oQ oQ ,vo �o 0o 00o ojo goo Nv TIME OF DAY Customer Characteristics No customer surveys were conducted as part of this analysis. However a previous study conducted for Frenchy's Rockaway Grill (Florida Design Consultants, Inc. August 2000) indicated 50% of the customers were "walk -up" that were already at Clearwater Beach for other reasons and visited Frenchy's as a side stop. A previous study conducted for Post Corner Pizza (Florida Design Consultants, Inc. July 2001) indicated 61% of the customers were already at Clearwater Beach for reasons other than visiting Post Corner Pizza. Due to its lunch and dinner hours, it is expected Frenchy's South Beach Cafe experiences a similar rate of "walk -up" customers, and since it is a beach location a large portion of customers would .be "captured" from the beach, nearby hotels and residential developments. These hotels and residential developments have ample on -site parking such that customers can walk to the restaurant and leave their cars parked at their home or hotel. It would be appropriate to reduce Frenchy's parking requirement based on a 50% wally -up rate. Therefore, a 15 space requirement is appropriate. Employee Parking Characteristics As requested at a June 9, 2008 meeting with staff, employee parking characteristics were examined. Frenchy's provided information regarding the travel mode to the beach. Frenchy's South Beach Cafe has a total of 32 employees of which 8 drive to work and of which 2 of those that drive their car work on the same shift. The existing spaces behind the restaurant were mostly vacant as shown in Table 1 and Table 2 indicating the employees were parking in off -site lots. Employees are given a beach employee parking pass, and most likely use Lot 32S which is the closest remaining lot to the restaurant. It is expected that practice will continue. For safety purposes the City of Clearwater will not permit parking on the frontage road in front of the restaurant. IV. FUTURE CONDITIONS WITH EXPANSION The proposed restaurant would require between 15 and 32 parking spaces according to strict interpretation of the code. Assuming the worst case a minimum of 2 existing parking spaces are available to satisfy any additional demand created by the restaurant. Other than the hours of 12 Noon to 4 PM on Saturday there are adequate existing parking spaces to support the expansion. GCC researched the construction plans for Beachwalk which is under construction and expected to be completed in Summer 2008. The construction plans include 17 on- street parking spaces on Coronado Drive, and 29 on- street parking spaces on South Gulfview Boulevard. Also an asphalt milling parking lot to contain 92 spaces, will be installed on the property formerly occupied by the Adam's Mark Hotel. This will create 138 parking spaces that were not included in 0 this study. Although these spaces are temporary they are expected to remain in operation for the near future. In addition the Hyatt Aqualea Hotel which is under construction has a Development Order provision to provide 400 parking spaces within their garage that are available to the general public. This will provide much anticipated parking supply for the area. This analysis was conducted in accordance with a specific methodology established with City of Clearwater staff. This analysis shows of the 206 total existing parking spaces included in the study area, a maximum of 204 were occupied during any hour of the study period.. Adequate parking is available other than the hours of 12 Noon to 4 PM on Saturday. The addition of 138 parking spaces by the City of Clearwater through completion of the Beachwalk project will satisfy the parking demand. The expansion of Frenchy's South Beach Cafe is not expected to realistically create any additional parking demand due to the customer characteristics and employee parking characteristics. As such, adequate parking will be available within reasonable walking distance of Frenchy's South Beach Cafe to support the expansion to this restaurant. • ll w I' l 'i k C35 25 Spaces S 23 -2 n2- Spaces Updated: 2/3/2008 ST ST W 0�1 Q4 Lot Hourly Rates Hours of After No. Location Mon-Fri Sat-Sun & Enforcement Hours Seasonal MARINA f36 Marina $0.75 $1.00 ACTIVITIES No 25 Causeway Blvd. k C35 25 Spaces S 23 -2 n2- Spaces Updated: 2/3/2008 ST ST W 0�1 Q4 Lot Hourly Rates Hours of After No. Location Mon-Fri Sat-Sun & Enforcement Hours Seasonal MARINA Spaces MARINA ACTIVITIES Temporary Causeway Parking U. ONLY (Sam - 6pm) (ACCESS FROM MEMORIAL CSWY. EAST BOUND ONLY) Cn LM '�_62S U-ACH WA t K umm.myClearwater.com SRI DRIVE Parking System Hotline U M (727) 562-4892 P J'J" General Parking Information ca (727) 562-4704 LM BAYSIDE err M ' 0 Clearwater m vrW_ To Parking Lot #40 - SAND KEY (1060 GULF BLVD.) Open: Sun-Up to Sun-Down (All times park gate is open) ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 752 spaces; $1.00/Hour - $1.25/Hour (Seasonal) 30 Marina $0.75 $1.00 ACTIVITIES No 25 Causeway Blvd. I ONLY Charge Sam-6pm ITA, Why 31 Pier 60 160 S. Gulfview Blvd. $1.50 $2.00 lam -Sam Closed 32S 332 S. Gulfview Blvd. $1.50 $2.00 7am-lam Closed 33 212 Hamden Dr. $1.00 $1.25 6am-11prn Closed 34 423 Mandalay Ave. $0.751 $1.00/ Sam-6pm No $1.00 $1.25 C har Charge 1 No 38 4 35 4S7 Mandalay Ave. $1.00 $1.25 Sam-6pm 1 Charge. 79 36 4 Rockaway St. $1.00 $1.25 6am-lam Closed Spaces 37 Avalon - Kendall $1.00 $1.25 Sam-lopm No 6 Avalon St. charge Family Aquatic Center Sam-6pm 38 & Recreation Center $1.00 $1.25 (Mon-Sat) 12:30pm-6pm No Charge 51 Bay Esplanade (Sun) 39 McKay Field $1.00 $L25 Sam-lopm No 605 Mandalay Ave. Charge 43 Gateway $1.00 $1.25 Sam-6prn No 390/1 East Shore Dr. Charge 62N 100 Coronado Or $8/day (Cash only) Sam- Sunset Closed 62S 150-170 Coronado Dr. $1.00 $1.25 6am-11prn Closed 63 400 E. Shore Dr. $1.00 $1.25 Sam-.6pm I No Charge I Beach Streets $1.00 $1.25 Varies 1 Varies 1 (173 spaces) 33 Spaces Seasonal Rate - March through April everyday ** Permit Parking Only J 43 Note: Does not include Handicap Spaces Rates & # of Spaces Subject to Change 41 Spaces LEGEND: Parking Lot - Open Parking Lot - Closed Road Closed W City Park l� Public Beach 30 284171 Spaces Spaces MARINA ACTIVITIES Temporary Causeway Parking U. ONLY (Sam - 6pm) (ACCESS FROM MEMORIAL CSWY. EAST BOUND ONLY) Cn LM '�_62S U-ACH WA t K umm.myClearwater.com SRI DRIVE Parking System Hotline U M (727) 562-4892 P J'J" General Parking Information ca (727) 562-4704 LM BAYSIDE err M ' 0 Clearwater m vrW_ To Parking Lot #40 - SAND KEY (1060 GULF BLVD.) Open: Sun-Up to Sun-Down (All times park gate is open) ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 752 spaces; $1.00/Hour - $1.25/Hour (Seasonal) ®® Jul. 1, 2008 3:04PM BILIRAKIS LAW GROUP Fox Cover Sheet 1 Bilirakis Law Group, LLC 4538 Bartelt Road 1 Holiday, Florida 34690 Telephoner 727- 937 -3226 Fax: 727- 934 -5069 1 No•5390 P- 1 Send to: From: Robert Pergolizzi Paul Gionis, Esq. ❑ Date: 1 ❑ July 1, 2008 F (727)524 -6090 Phone Number: 727- 937 -3226 Re: Frenchy's Restaurant Attached please find list of employees and their mode of transportation for the above. Paul Gionis ❑ Urgent ❑ Reply ASAP 1 ❑ Please comment ❑ Please Review ❑ For your Information ' Total pages, including cover: 3 Re: Frenchy's Restaurant Attached please find list of employees and their mode of transportation for the above. Paul Gionis Juju I. 2008a 3 : 04PM FB I L I RAK I S LAW GROUP 72744605SEN0 5390 FAX COVER SHEET Frmchyms Cate, Inc. Fre nchy's Sallwater Cafe, Inc. F chy's Rockaway Grill, Inc, Fre nchy's south Beach CaM. Inc. Iare ncfh )(s off the Floofk, Inc. Fe luy's Seafood Inc. Date: 22Z Pag ®s to X011 0vv: .. � P. 2 p. i Qlrgmt ® Rep#y ASAP Per Your Requast Pill -' w R0v1Qw �r Your l nrormaaDon FRENCHY'S COR ORATE OFFICE 419 east Shore ®rva vammmter Reach, FL 33761 727 - "9.2729 frern�6�ysoo�fln ®.cowl Ju J u I- 1- 20083 3 04PM FB I L I RAK I S LAW GROUP 727446®s®ENo - 5390 P. 3 p.2 ° ••_� I rncro�pv JUUUN KEACH • la 009 /001 i) rt") t• 1_l G ?:l t^v EMPLOYEE' Lb SOUTH BEACH THAT SIXE, WALK O IS O VE TO WORK. ' 102 DEBRA CO DRIVE 107 SARAH GORC ON DRIVE 120 JONATHAN KI BY DRIVE 103 CELSO SENA BIKE 379 JOSHUA LIPP BIKE '7 318 AMBER HOHN HORST BIKE 320 MATT SEARS DRIVE 329 JUSTIN KOW LSKI DRIVE 359 AARON HAU HEE BIKE 339 GENO HAIBO (CZ BUS 357 SCOTT PAINT E R BUS z 332 TIMOTHY BAR TON DRIVE 317 NICOLE SAU E DROP OFF a 392 KELLY HALL ER DROP OFF 422 ERIN TYLER DRIVE 414 ANGELA REY OLDS CAR POOL 337 STEFANI E NEWELL CAR FOOL 393 MEEGHAN SANTIAGO DRIVE 515 STEVEN GES ING BIKE zO 530 LAUREN RILL NG DROP OFF =' 220 DONATO LD BIKE 2� 221 HERIBERTO F EREZ.ZENIL BIKE t 225 ALBERTO BEL RAN BIKE )-4 231 JULIAN REYEc BIKE 232 JUAN AGUILA BIKE 2� 237 SEVERIAN SA - CHEZ BIKE 238 JAVIER AGUI R BIKE 240 JORGE REYE BIKE �q 245 AIDA PENA WALK =° 247 LUIS CONTER S BIKE 249 GERARDO ME qDOZA BIKE r� 270 ROSENDO SA13ANILLA BIKE' i) rt") t• 1_l G ?:l t^v ALANIK PROPERTIES LLC 421 GULFVIEW BLVD CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2508 CANTERBURY OAKS INC 401 S GULFVIEW BLVD CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2508 DE ANGELES, DAVID A KRUEGER, SHAWN M 745 MIAMI PASS MADISON WI 53711 - 2932 DOBIE, GARY A DOBIE, SANDRA P 2854 OWL AVE PALM HARBOR FL 34683 - 6440 FLAMINGO BAY CONDO DEVELOPERS 300 HAMDEN DR CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2448 HARVEY, MARY C REVOCABLE TRUST 2 SEASIDE LN BELLEAIR FL 33756 - LOMINC 4100 N 28TH TER HOLLYWOOD FL 33020 - 1116 LUCCA DEVELOPMENT LLC 16132 ARMISTEAD ODESSA FL 33556 - MALKE, ROBERT E MALKE, TERESA L PO BOX 2124 LARGO FL 33779 - 2124 NIKANA HOLDINGS LLC 421 S GULFVIEW BLVD CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2508 op 2008- 04009; 41 BARROWS, SCOTT BARROWS, JUDY 100 BAYSIDE DR # 202 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2539 CZAICKI, EDWARD CZAICKI, BOZENA 332 HAMDEN DR CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2448 DE ANGLES, DAVID A DE ANGLES, STEVEN J 745 MIAMI PASS MADISON WI 53711 - 2932 FIFTH SOUTH LLC 16132 ARMIOSTEAD ODESSA FL 33556 - GIADLA, WERONIKA GIADLA, ALOJZY 355 S GULFVIEW BLVD CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2445 KALLAS, DORA KALLAS, GEORGE 3405 GULF BLVD BELLEAIR BCH FL 33786 - 3644 L O M INC 4100 N 28TH TERR HOLLYWOOD FL 33020 - 1116 LUCCA DEVELOPMENT LLC 9011 S NATOMA AVE OAK LAWN I L 60453 - 1466 MAYEUX, TIM MAYEUX, DORITA F 100 BAYSIDE DR # 103 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2539 PRESTON, MICHAEL G THE 419 EASTSHORE DR CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2028 fol-DOG, DOROTHY C THE M & J TRUST PO BOX 8589 CLEARWATER FL 33758 - 8589 D'AMICO, LOUIS J 410 HAMDEN DR CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2535 DIDOMIZIO INVESTMENTS INC 648 POINSETTIA AVE N CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1513 FIFTH SOUTH LLC 401 CORONADO DR CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2506 HAASE REAL ESTATE HOLDINGS INC 2682 GLENEAGLES DR CLEARWATER FL 33761 - 2736 KOZIK, ROBERT KOZIK, GIOVANNI 317 CORONADO DR CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2433 LITTLE, DAVID R 1734 CASEY JONES CT - CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 1701 M 3 B DEVELOPMENT LLC 1951 BRIGHTWATERS BLVD NE ST PETERSBURG FL 33704 - MC KIM, KEVIN A MC KIM, MARY K 100 BAYSIDE DR # 102 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2539 R T V PROPERTIES INC 331 CORONADO DR CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2433 ROGERS, SINDY M CAVANAUGH, MICHAEL 300 S SCHMALE CAROL STREAM IL 60188 - 2702 0 SNYDER, NORMAN G SNYDER, LINDA ANN 100 BAYSIDE DR #401 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2539 SUN WEST PALMS CONDO ASSN SZLECHTA, WLODZIMIERZ INC KUNOWSKA, EWA 130 BAYSIDE DR 333 CORONADO DR CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2501 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2433 TROPICANA RESORT LAND ZIMMERMANN, GUNDER TRUST 312 WINDWARD IS 300 HAMDEN DR CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2327 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2448 %FRONAS, JAMES SOFRONAS, CHRISTINE 431 GULFVIEW BLVD CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2508 TAS, JERRY TAS,TERESA 342 HAMDEN DR CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2451 0 CITY OF CLEARWATER NOTICE OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD PUBLIC HEARINGS The Community Development Board of the City of Clearwater, Florida, will hold public hearings on Tuesday, April 21, 2009, beginning at 1:00 p.m., in the City Council Chambers, in City Hall, 3rd floor, 112 South Osceola Ave, Clearwater, Florida, to consider the following requests: NOTE: All persons wishing to address an item need to be present at the BEGINNING of the meeting. Those cases that are not contested by the applicant, staff, neighboring property owners, etc. will be placed on a consent agenda and approved by a single vote at the beginning of the meeting. 1. James P. & Joyce P. Gills are requesting Flexible Development approval for a new single family detached dwelling within the Low Density Residential (LDR) District with a lot area of 108,700 sq ft, (72,722 sq ft Open Space/Recreation (OSR) and 36,178 sq ft LDR), a lot width of 242 ft, a reduction to the side (north) setback from 15 ft to 10 ft (to building), a reduction to the side (south) setback from 15 ft to 10 ft (to building), a reduction to the rear (west) setback from 15 ft to zero ft (to raised pool and building) from the Coastal Construction Control Line (CCCL) and an increase in the maximum building height from 30 ft to 34 ft (to midpoint of pitched roof) as a Residential Infill Redevelopment Project as per Community Development Code Sec. 2- 104.D. (Proposed Use: Detached Dwelling) at 1154 and 1160 Mandalay Point Rd., Mandalay Point Sub 1 S` Add Lots 14 thru 17A. Assigned Planner: A. Scott Kurleman, Planner III. FLD2009 -02004 2. Anna Tsafatinos is requesting Flexible Development approval to permit'a restaurant in the Downtown (D) District within an existing building with zero off - street parking spaces as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Community Development Code Sec. 2- 903.C. (Proposed Use: Restaurant) at 22 N. Fort Harrison Ave., Earl & Tate's Sub that Part of Lots 12 & 13 Unsubdivided Land Desc as Beg 43 FT S of NE Cor Lot 13 TH S 43.5 Ft TH W 97 FT TH N 43.5 FT TH E 97 FT to POB. Assigned Planner: A. Scott Kurleman, Planner III. FLD2009 -03010 3. Michael Preston (Frenchy's South Beach, Inc.) is requesting Flexible Development approval to permit a 228 sq ft building addition and a minor deck expansion for an existing restaurant within the Tourist (T) District with a front (west) setback of zero ft (to building), a side (south) setback of zero ft (to building/pavement), a side (north) setback of 15.91 ft (to building) and 5 ft (to pavement), and a rear (east) setback of 42 ft (to building) and zero ft (to pavement); a building height of 22 ft; and 5 off - street parking spaces as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Community Development Code Sec. 2- 803.C; and a reduction to the required foundation landscaping along S. Gulfview Blvd. from 5 to zero ft as part of a Comprehensive Landscape Program, under the provisions of Community Development Code Sec. 3- 1202.G. (Proposed Use: Restaurant) at 351 S. Gulfview Blvd., Lloyd- White- Skinner Sub Lot 70. Assigned Planner: Robert G. Tefft, Development Review Manager. FLD2008 -04009 4. Heritage United Methodist Church at Countryside, Inc. is requesting Flexible Development approval to permit the redevelopment of an existing place of worship in the Institutional (I) District with a lot area of 8.63 acres, a lot width along Landmark Dr. (east) of 738 ft and along State Road 580 (north) of 375 ft, a front (east) setback of 28.6 ft (to existing building) and 9.24 ft (to existing pavement), a front (north) setback of 39.3 ft (to existing building), a side (west) setback of 35.5 ft (to existing building) and 10 ft (to existing pavement), a 0 „ 0 side (north) setback of zero ft (to existing and proposed pavement), a side (south) setback of 44 ft (to proposed building) and 18 ft (to proposed pavement), a rear (west) setback of 28 ft (to proposed pavement) and 23 ft (to proposed dumpster enclosure), a building height of 38 ft (to midpoint of pitched roof) and 404 parking spaces (on- and off - site), as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Community Development Code Sec. 2- 1204.A; and a reduction to the front buffer along Landmark Dr. from 15 to 9.24 ft (to existing pavement), a reduction to the north buffer from five to zero ft (to existing and proposed pavement) and a reduction to the west buffer from 12 to 10 ft (to parking spaces), as a Comprehensive Landscape Program, under the provisions of Community Development Code Sec. 3- 1202.G. (Proposed Use: Redevelopment of an existing place of worship) at 2650 and 2680 Landmark Dr., From NW Cor of SE '/4TH E 1200FT TH S 53.6FT for POB TH E 322.78FT TH SE'LY 38.43FT TH S 464.51FT TH W 350FT TH N 490.817T to POB Cont 3.97 AC(C), and from NW Cor of SE' /4 TH W 800FT TH S 544.51FT for POB TH S 269.85FT TH E 775.42FT to W R/W of Landmar Dr TH N'ly Alg R/W Cur RT RAD 93.75FT ARC 218.51FT CB N07DW 218.92FT TH N 53.15FT TH W 750FT to POB Cont 4.73AC(C). Assigned Planner: Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Planner III. FLD2009 -02002 5. Ruth B Marks THE (Dunkin' Donuts) is requesting Flexible Development approval to permit the upgrading and expansion of an existing restaurant with a lot area of 22,977 sq ft (after vacation of a portion of the Turner St. right -of -way), a lot width of 132 ft along S. Missouri Ave. (east) (after vacation of a portion of the Turner St. right -of -way) and 170 ft along Turner St. (north) (after vacation of a portion of the Turner St. right -of -way), a front (east) setback of 12 ft (to pavement), a front (north) setback of zero ft (to existing sidewalk), a side (west) setback of 5.5 ft (to pavement), a side (south) setback of 4.75 ft (to pavement), a building height of 11 ft (to flat roof deck) and 25 parking spaces, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Community Development Code Sec. 2- 704.M; and a reduction to the landscape buffer along S. Missouri Ave. (east) from 15 to 12 ft, a reduction to the landscape buffer along Turner St. (north) from 10 to zero ft, a reduction to the landscape buffer along the south property line from 5 to 4.75 ft, a reduction to required interior landscape area from 10 to 5 percent of the vehicular use area and reductions to the foundation landscape area along the east side of the building from 5 to 4.25 ft and along the north side of the building from 5 to zero ft, as a Comprehensive Landscape Program, under the provisions of Community Development Code Sec. 3- 1202.G. (Proposed Use: Upgrading and expansion of an existing restaurant (Dunkin' Donuts) at 600 S. Missouri Ave, Turner Street Groves (Dunkin Donuts LSE) Lots 6 thru 12 Incl & Vac Alley Between Less Rd R/W. Assigned Planner: Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Planner III. FLD2009 -02003 6. Countryside Christian Center (Pastor Glen Gammon) is requesting an appeal from a Level One (Flexible Standard Development) denial decision pursuant to Community Development Code Sec. 4- 501.A.3, that a requested basketball court within an existing grass off - street parking area is inconsistent with the General Standards for Level One Approvals as set forth in Community Development Code Sec. 3- 913.A.6; the standards for Off - Street Parking Spaces as set forth in Community Development Code Sec. 3- 1404.13 and C; and the standards for Conformance to Uniform Traffic Control Devices as set forth in Community Development Code Sec. 3- 1410.A. (Existing Use: Place of Worship.) at 1850 McMullen Booth Rd., Beg SW Cor of NW '/4 of SW '/4 TH N45DE 1219.16FT TH E 289.43FT to RD R/W TH S Alg R/W 1153FT(S) TH W 362.25FT TH N 236.01FT TH W 813.22FT TH N 50.217T to POB Cont 17.4AC(C). Assigned Planner: Matt Jackson, Planner II.. APP2009 -00001 Interested parties may appear and be heard at the hearing or file written notice of approval or objection with the Planning Director or City Clerk prior to the hearing. Any person who decides 0 , to appeal any decision made by the Board or Council, with respect to any matter considered at such hearings, will need to request a record of the proceedings and, for such purpose, may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based per Florida Statute 286.0105. Community Development Code Sec 4 -206 states that party status shall be granted by the Board in quasi-judicial cases if the person requesting such status demonstrates that s/he is substantially affected. Party status entitles parties to personally testify, present evidence, argument and witnesses, cross - examine witnesses, appeal the decision and speak on reconsideration requests, and needs to be requested and obtained during the case discussion before the CDB. An oath will be administered swearing in all persons giving testimony in quasi-judicial public hearing cases. If you wish to speak at the meeting, please wait to be recognized, then state and spell your name and provide your address. Persons without party status speaking before the CDB shall be limited to three minutes unless an individual is representing a group in which case the Chairperson may authorize a reasonable amount of time up to 10 minutes. Five days prior to the meeting, staff reports and recommendations on the above requests will be available for review by interested parties between the hours of 8:30 a.m. and 4:30 p.m., weekdays, at the City of Clearwater, Planning Department, 100 S. Myrtle Ave., Clearwater, FL 33756. Please contact the assigned planner at 562 -4567 to discuss any questions or concerns about the project and /or to better understand the proposal and review the site plan. Michael Delk Cynthia E. Goudeau, MMC Planning Director City Clerk City of Clearwater P.O. Box 4748, Clearwater, FL 33758 -4748 NOTE: Applicant or representative must be present at the hearing. A COPY OF THIS AD IN LARGE PRINT IS AVAILABLE IN OFFICIAL RECORDS AND LEGISLATIVE SERVICES. ANY PERSON WITH A DISABILITY REQUIRING REASONABLE ACCOMMODATION IN ORDER TO PARTICIPATE IN THIS MEETING SHOULD CALL (727) 562 -4093 WITH THEIR REQUEST. To learn more about presenting to Clearwater boards and City Council, go to http:// clearwater .granicus.comNiewPublisher.phP ?view id =11 and click on 'Resident Engagement Video." You can also check the informational video out from any Clearwater public library. Ad: 04/09/09 Ryr Stilt f G q r sat W o, y r .: riai� . til�idenark'letivan ge - - - Tidema €kAdyantage[RobertTeftt�Rjj, j fl! Edit Options Window Help Ut Now Opcn Tusk List QBE cis - - Cl-c Edit Pcoitct Group Add Clont P..I Activity Peoplt Fees Valuation Condition; Cosa Notts Tags Documents GIs c— Building Construction Permit,; Aaivitr us EXP.—,,;,,,.a» - -.6-CP2003 -02560 N6me;.CBC052216 Updated. 311212003 Atlas General ^' Address: 351 S GULFVIEW BLVD _JC Master- BCP2003- 02560 - i r PRJ #: BCP2003.02560 Project FRENCHX S SOUTH BEACH _ _ Genera 2 .J D_ ascription:, NEED SUB TRADES FINAL INSPECTIONS FOR PREVIOUS ADDITION OF 1 Type o Work RESTROOM, NEW DECK AND 2ND FLOOR ADDITION 267 SQ FT T pe of Permit: Inspector Comments: ence _ ddition � . Permit Dates I T _ �--j Residenfia IComme naL _ � Date Received: 2125!200 R04 tion Proiect _ Commercial 1 TIERNAN,JULIE JULIE TIERNAN _ Exlstin Use: Target Date: -_ Zoning — ___— ___-- - -- -._ FLOOD VARIANCE �.__ .___ .____._— - JDRAKAKIS, PETER __. _ PETER DRAKAKIS Restaurant Comments Sent Date:. E'S CAFE TIERNAN,JULIE JULIE TIERNAN _ Proposed Use: _ Date Issued: _311$t2gq Restaurant Date Finaled: Tree ABLE WINDOWS JULIE S SEAFOOD & SUNSET S JULIE S SEAFOOD & Sl !JULIE S SEAFOOD &SUNSETS JULIE S SEAFOOD & St Units' Stones Census-. 43r Bin TM+_ IU2 Date Expired: 9/13 /200 U !JULIE S SEAFOOD & SUNSET S JULIE S SEAFOOD & V Directions K WITH 30'P RoTECT1VE RAILING, PORCH LIGHTS, LJULIE S SEAFOOD & SUNSET S JULIE S SEAFOOD & St ......_...._.____..._ ......................... ............................... M SYSTEM UULIE S_SEAFO_OD_ &SUNSETS JULIE S SEAFOOD & St SEAFOOD & SUNSET AT JULIES �— SEAFO0D & SUNSET BCP1999 -06682 351 S GULFVIEW BLVD' EXP PEDESTAL PUBLIC PAY PHONE ON EXISTING SLAB; ELECTRIC AND BUILDING NEEDED; LOCATED C3 JULIE'S SEETS PAY PHONE OWNER BCP1999.12578 351 S GULFVIEW BLVD _ EXP add 1 restroom; new deck and 2nd floor addition 267 sf 'JULIES SEAFOOD AND SUNSETS BC P2001- 01321 351 S GULFVIEW BLVD CMP T_ PIPE AND CONNECT NATURAL GAS 2 SUNPAK HEATERS - _ SEAFOOD & SUNSETS — _.CGC057616 C-8286 BCP2003- 02291 351 S GULFVIEW BLVD CMP DECKADOMON1REMODEL FRENCHY'S SOUTH BEACH CBC052216 BCP2003- 02291A 351 S GULFVIEW BLVD CMP BUILDING AMENDMENT: ADD SINK.AND FLOOR DRAIN TO PLAN FRENCHY'S SOUTH BEACH_RENOVATI CBC052216 351 S GULFVIEW BLVD CMP BUILDING AMENDMENT: "ADD ELECTRICAL SUB PANEL TO EXISTING SERVICE" — _ - �IFRENCHY'S BCP2003- 02291B SOUTH BEACH �— CBC052216 BCP2003:02560 351 S GULFVIEW BLVD EXP NEED SUB TRADES FINAL INSPELiIONS FOR PREVIOUS ADD510H OF I RESTROOK NEW DECK AND 2ND FLOiFRENCHY'S SOUTH BEACH CBC0522 16 . BCP2003 -03042 351 S GULFVIEW BLVD 1VOI AMENDMENT: ADD SINK AND FLOOR DRAIN TO PLAN FRENCHY'S SOUTH BEACH RENOVATI CBC052216 j BCP2003.03359 351 S GULFVIEW BLVD �- CMP RELOCATION AND ADDING FIRE SPRINKLER HEADS — —� FRENCHY'S EN SOUTH BEACH 420206000194 BCP2003.03488 351 S GULFVIEW BLVD VOI w_._ —_ _ -� MICHAEL G PRESTO BCP2003.03760 351 S GULFVIEW BLVD CMP (2):3TON EQUAL CHANGE OUT PRESTON, MICHAEL MICHAEL .CAC050443 IN I BCP_2007- 02105 351 S GULFVIEW BLVD CMP REMOVE AND REPLACE (7) SO STAMCO CRIMP ARCHfrECTURAL METAL ROOF SYSTEM _ FRENLY'S S CHRISTOPHER S YOU BCP2007- 08208 1351 S GULFVIEW BLVD ACT UPGRADE ANSUL FIRE SUPPRESSION SYSTEM TO MEET UL 3DO STANDARD — _ FRENCHYS SOUTH BEACH JOHN M EMMERT BIZ2006- 01549 351 S GULFVIEW BLVD CMP Banners on fast f{ocr,'Budweiser & Becks FRENCHY'S SOUTH BEACH MICHAEL G PRESTON ' CDC2007.01955 351 S GULFVIEW BLVD NVO Property maintenance FRENCHY'S SOUTH BEACH MICHAEL G PRESTON COD1892.4278 351 S GULFVIEW BLVD CMP_ SIGN AMORTIZATION �- JULIE F NICHOLS JULIE F NICHOLS COD1995.1098 1351 S GULFVIEW BLVD CMP _ SIGN SURVEY SEAFOOD & SUNSETSATJULIE'S - � COD1995.5790 1351 S GULFVIEW BLVD CMP INSTALLED AWNING WITHOUT PERMIT JUUE F NICHOLS COD2001.00285 1351 S GULFVIEW BLVD CMP 0agal freestanding menu sign, signage attached to palm tree, and i legaV displaying Superbo_wl b_ann =rs. SEAFOOD & SUNSET AT JULIES JULIE NICHOLS COD2001 -03295 351 S GULFVIEW BLVD CMP Fence around dumpster needs repair __ IJULIE S SALTWATER CAFE T� JULIE NICHOLS FLD2008 -04009 1351 S GULFVIEW BLVD REC _ FRENCHY'S SOUTH BEACH PRESTON, MICHAEL G FLS ...... 1 351 S GULFVIEW BLVD - -- .........._ .................................. ................._......_._. -.. APR To add 469 square feet to an existing restaurant 267 square feet will be enclosed and 202 square feet will be FLEX STAND T STEVE SPENCER _ 4 1 .351 S GULFVIEW BLVD ISS RESTAURANT_ FRENC_HY'S SOUTH BEACH CAFE INC FRENCHY'S SOUTH BE SGN1989.030665 351 S GULFVIEW BLVD JCMP _ _ FACE CHANGE OF POLE SIGN FOR RESTAURANTSIGH WORK ONLY T _ U TIERNAN — JUUE TIERNAN M , View /Add Activlies 0 0 Ca[eridar 1coft` E Jidemark Advantage [Robert Tefft - R_Tj_ File Edit Options Vilwidow Help Elul New Open Toth lice G GBE GIs close Vic. Add Nkte s sign Off Print Docemc.t:' ID Building Construction Permit - -- BCP2003- 02560 Status EXP Name:.CBC052216 U Updated: 3912(203 JG� Atlas C Ira' A ' ' f 0 ON 898 chnty..9r „$ 2003:Q2,56Q - ... - Descn tiort Dis =Done Date1 Date2 Dates totes 404 Final - Mechanical WR 1 3/1812003 3/19/2003 iScheduled by W on Tuesday, March 18, 2003 @ 4:30:20 PM.Contact: (727)6%.4935 404 Final - Mechanical IVR 3/1912003 31202003 Scheduled by IVR on Wednesday, March 19, 2063 @ 3 :56:06 PM.Contact (727)6564935 Expred on 1; -SEP- 2003 .. __j DONE j _EXP 9114/2003 9D1 Completed Roof COMM' ( RVA 3242063 3!252003 3252003 ( check old perm! It bcp 1999 -12S78 ,vern packer did in- progress insp.)__ Scheduled by NR on Monday, March 24, 2003 @ 9:30:34 A.M.Contact (727)656 -493 404 Final- Mechanical COMM', BMC 3212003 3/24/2003 3124/2003 Scheduled by NR on Friday, March 21 2003 @ 4:15:41' PM. Contact: (727)656- 4935__CInspection on existing walk-in cooler only - passtpending electrical inspe. 305 Final- Plumbing COMM' W P 3202003 3212063 3212603 Caged in on wrong perml.'u u_i-Scheduted by NR on Thursday, March 20, 2003 @ 6:29:08 PM.Contact: 418-8789 801 Completed Roof COMM RVA 3f18/2003 311.92D03 3/202003 ( need in- progress pictures on job site at time of insp.)Schedule_d by IVR on Tuesday, March 18, 2003 @ 428:45 PM.Contact: (727)656-4rS 404 Final - Mechanical CANC BMC 31192003 3202003 3/202003 Scheduled by IVR on Wednesday, March 19, 2003 @ 3:58:27 PM'. Contact: (727)656 -4935 (Plot ready for inspection - electrical for walk -in coolers not to code, _ 9D1 Completed Roof COMM RVA 31192003 3202003 3120/2003 ( need in-progress pictures.)Scheduted by PIR on Wednesday, March 19, 2003 @ 5:24:46 Pk1.Contact (727)656 -4935 _ Override - Parcel! HGIds JMP 311812D03 _- Override - Parcel, Holds _ JMP 31182D03 Issue Placard DONE I JMP 311812D03 — - O �B-uWmg Review DONE -_ -T -C 3!122003 3112/2003 OUPIUCATE SET OF PLANS _ iLog-in Note^, 225/2003 ORIGINAL PERMIT 4BCP1.999- 12578. NOW A NEW CONTRACTOR. ANEW PERMIT CREATED FOR ALL FINALS PER ROB HAYS. FEES FOR NENY PERMIT AND PLA __- Application received JC 2252003 1 BCP1999.12578 351 S GULFVIEW BLVD BCP2001.01321 351 S GULFVIEW BLVD BCP2003.02291 351 S GULFVIEW BLVD BCP2003- 02291A 351 S GULFVIEW BLVD BCP2003- 022918 351 S GULFVIEW BLVD B_CP2003.02560 351 S�GULFVIEW BLVD BCP2003 -03042 351 S GULFVIEW BLVD BCP2003 -03359 351 S GULFVIEW BLVD BCP2003 -03488 351 S GULFVIEW BLVD BCP2003 -03760 351 S GULFVIEW BLVD BCP2007 -02105 351 S GULFVIEW BLVD BCP2007. 08208 351 S GULFVIEW BLVD BIZ2006.01549 351 S GULFVIEW BLVD CDC2007.01955 351 S GULFVIEW BLVD COD1992.4278 351 S GULFVIEW BLVD COD1995.10SR 351 S GLILFVIFW RI Vn ESTAL PUBLIC PAY PHONE ON EXISTING SLAB; ELECTRIC AND BUILDING NEEDED; LOCATED @JULIESSE,ETS PAY PHONE I.OWNER 1 restroom: new deck and 2nd floor addition 267 sf _ JULIE S SEAFOOD AND SUNSETS CGCO57616 AND CONNECT NATURAL GAS 2 SUNPAK HEATERS �— - �— SEAFOOD & SUNSETS - .C.8286 KADDITION/REMODEL FRENCHY'S SOUTH BEACH CBC052216 DING AMENDMENT: ADD SINK AND FLOOR DRAIN TO PLAN _ FRENCHY'S SOUTH BEACH RENOVATI .CBC052216 ,DING AMENDMENT: "ADD ELECTRICAL SUB PANEL TO EXISTING SERVICE' _ FRENCHY'S SOUTH BEACH CBC052216 D SUB TRADES FINAL INSPECTIONS FOR PREVIOUS.ADDIiiON OF 1 RESTROOM, NE'i/ DECK AI'ID 2ND FLO FRENCHY'S SOUTH BEACH CBC052216 .NDMENT: ADD SINK AND FLOOR DRAIN TO PLAN FRENCHY'S SOUTH BEACH RENOVATI CBC052216 DCATION AND ADDING FIRE SPRINKLER HEADS FRENCHY'S SOUTH BEACH .420206000194 MICHAEL G PRESTO 1TON EQUAL CHANGE OUT PRESTON, MICHAEL CAC050443 OVE AND REPLACE (7) SOS TAMCO CR161P ARCHITECTURAL METAL ROOF SYSTEM FRENCY'S SOUTHBEACH CHRISTOPHER S YO RADE ANSUL FIRE SUPPRESSION SYSTEM TO MEETUL 300 STANDARD FRENCHYS SOUTH BEACH JOHN M EMMERT nets on first floor, `Budweiser & Becks FRENCHY'S SOUTH BEACH MICHAEL G PRESTO „rty maintenance FRENCHY'S SOUTH BEACH MICHAEL G PRESTO N AMORTIZATION JULIE F NICHOLS -- —�_ J'. CI10 \/FV CC'A CAllrl R CIIUCCTC AT1111 rc+C .. .. .- -... _.. -. _ - COD1995.5790 351 S GULFVIEW BLVD CMP INSTALLED AWNING WITHOUT PERMIT JULIE F NICHOLS COD2001.00285 351 S GULFVIEW BLVD CMP magal freestanding menu sign, signage attached to palm tree, and illegally displaying Superbowl ba__nn_ers. _IS_EA�FO_OD�& SUNSET AT JULIES JULIE NICHOLS COD2001.03295 351 S GULFVIEW BLVD CMP Fence around dumpster needs repair JULIE S SALT WATER CAFE JULIE NICHOLS FLS 00.01 -01 351 S GULFVIEW BLVD __........_._ .................. ....._...................................................................... OCL9046401 351 S GULFVIEW BLVD SGN1989- 030665 1351 S GULFVIEW BLVD FMLNLHY'b bUU I H tiLALH PRESTON, MICHAEL APR To add 469 square feet to an existing restaurant 267 square feet wig be enclosed and 2D2 square feet w01 be FLEX STAND STEVE SPENCER . ............................. .................. _ ........ _ .................... _. .... _. ... ---- ............. ................................................. _ . ...... _ - - - -- . ISS RESTAURANT FRENCHY'S SOUTH BEACH CAFE INC FRENCHY'S SOUTH I CMP FACE CHANGE OF POLE SIGN FOR RESTAURANTSIGN WORK ONLY JULIE TIERMAN JULIE TIERMAN BCP1999.12578 351 S GULFVIEW BLVD BCP2001.01321 351 S GULFVIEW BLVD BCP2003.02291 351 S GULFVIEW BLVD BCP2003- 02291A 351 S GULFVIEW BLVD BCP2003- 022918 351 S GULFVIEW BLVD B_CP2003.02560 351 S�GULFVIEW BLVD BCP2003 -03042 351 S GULFVIEW BLVD BCP2003 -03359 351 S GULFVIEW BLVD BCP2003 -03488 351 S GULFVIEW BLVD BCP2003 -03760 351 S GULFVIEW BLVD BCP2007 -02105 351 S GULFVIEW BLVD BCP2007. 08208 351 S GULFVIEW BLVD BIZ2006.01549 351 S GULFVIEW BLVD CDC2007.01955 351 S GULFVIEW BLVD COD1992.4278 351 S GULFVIEW BLVD COD1995.10SR 351 S GLILFVIFW RI Vn ESTAL PUBLIC PAY PHONE ON EXISTING SLAB; ELECTRIC AND BUILDING NEEDED; LOCATED @JULIESSE,ETS PAY PHONE I.OWNER 1 restroom: new deck and 2nd floor addition 267 sf _ JULIE S SEAFOOD AND SUNSETS CGCO57616 AND CONNECT NATURAL GAS 2 SUNPAK HEATERS �— - �— SEAFOOD & SUNSETS - .C.8286 KADDITION/REMODEL FRENCHY'S SOUTH BEACH CBC052216 DING AMENDMENT: ADD SINK AND FLOOR DRAIN TO PLAN _ FRENCHY'S SOUTH BEACH RENOVATI .CBC052216 ,DING AMENDMENT: "ADD ELECTRICAL SUB PANEL TO EXISTING SERVICE' _ FRENCHY'S SOUTH BEACH CBC052216 D SUB TRADES FINAL INSPECTIONS FOR PREVIOUS.ADDIiiON OF 1 RESTROOM, NE'i/ DECK AI'ID 2ND FLO FRENCHY'S SOUTH BEACH CBC052216 .NDMENT: ADD SINK AND FLOOR DRAIN TO PLAN FRENCHY'S SOUTH BEACH RENOVATI CBC052216 DCATION AND ADDING FIRE SPRINKLER HEADS FRENCHY'S SOUTH BEACH .420206000194 MICHAEL G PRESTO 1TON EQUAL CHANGE OUT PRESTON, MICHAEL CAC050443 OVE AND REPLACE (7) SOS TAMCO CR161P ARCHITECTURAL METAL ROOF SYSTEM FRENCY'S SOUTHBEACH CHRISTOPHER S YO RADE ANSUL FIRE SUPPRESSION SYSTEM TO MEETUL 300 STANDARD FRENCHYS SOUTH BEACH JOHN M EMMERT nets on first floor, `Budweiser & Becks FRENCHY'S SOUTH BEACH MICHAEL G PRESTO „rty maintenance FRENCHY'S SOUTH BEACH MICHAEL G PRESTO N AMORTIZATION JULIE F NICHOLS -- —�_ J'. CI10 \/FV CC'A CAllrl R CIIUCCTC AT1111 rc+C .. .. .- -... _.. -. _ - COD1995.5790 351 S GULFVIEW BLVD CMP INSTALLED AWNING WITHOUT PERMIT JULIE F NICHOLS COD2001.00285 351 S GULFVIEW BLVD CMP magal freestanding menu sign, signage attached to palm tree, and illegally displaying Superbowl ba__nn_ers. _IS_EA�FO_OD�& SUNSET AT JULIES JULIE NICHOLS COD2001.03295 351 S GULFVIEW BLVD CMP Fence around dumpster needs repair JULIE S SALT WATER CAFE JULIE NICHOLS FLS 00.01 -01 351 S GULFVIEW BLVD __........_._ .................. ....._...................................................................... OCL9046401 351 S GULFVIEW BLVD SGN1989- 030665 1351 S GULFVIEW BLVD FMLNLHY'b bUU I H tiLALH PRESTON, MICHAEL APR To add 469 square feet to an existing restaurant 267 square feet wig be enclosed and 2D2 square feet w01 be FLEX STAND STEVE SPENCER . ............................. .................. _ ........ _ .................... _. .... _. ... ---- ............. ................................................. _ . ...... _ - - - -- . ISS RESTAURANT FRENCHY'S SOUTH BEACH CAFE INC FRENCHY'S SOUTH I CMP FACE CHANGE OF POLE SIGN FOR RESTAURANTSIGN WORK ONLY JULIE TIERMAN JULIE TIERMAN ESTAL PUBLIC PAY PHONE ON EXISTING SLAB; ELECTRIC AND BUILDING NEEDED; LOCATED @JULIESSE,ETS PAY PHONE I.OWNER 1 restroom: new deck and 2nd floor addition 267 sf _ JULIE S SEAFOOD AND SUNSETS CGCO57616 AND CONNECT NATURAL GAS 2 SUNPAK HEATERS �— - �— SEAFOOD & SUNSETS - .C.8286 KADDITION/REMODEL FRENCHY'S SOUTH BEACH CBC052216 DING AMENDMENT: ADD SINK AND FLOOR DRAIN TO PLAN _ FRENCHY'S SOUTH BEACH RENOVATI .CBC052216 ,DING AMENDMENT: "ADD ELECTRICAL SUB PANEL TO EXISTING SERVICE' _ FRENCHY'S SOUTH BEACH CBC052216 D SUB TRADES FINAL INSPECTIONS FOR PREVIOUS.ADDIiiON OF 1 RESTROOM, NE'i/ DECK AI'ID 2ND FLO FRENCHY'S SOUTH BEACH CBC052216 .NDMENT: ADD SINK AND FLOOR DRAIN TO PLAN FRENCHY'S SOUTH BEACH RENOVATI CBC052216 DCATION AND ADDING FIRE SPRINKLER HEADS FRENCHY'S SOUTH BEACH .420206000194 MICHAEL G PRESTO 1TON EQUAL CHANGE OUT PRESTON, MICHAEL CAC050443 OVE AND REPLACE (7) SOS TAMCO CR161P ARCHITECTURAL METAL ROOF SYSTEM FRENCY'S SOUTHBEACH CHRISTOPHER S YO RADE ANSUL FIRE SUPPRESSION SYSTEM TO MEETUL 300 STANDARD FRENCHYS SOUTH BEACH JOHN M EMMERT nets on first floor, `Budweiser & Becks FRENCHY'S SOUTH BEACH MICHAEL G PRESTO „rty maintenance FRENCHY'S SOUTH BEACH MICHAEL G PRESTO N AMORTIZATION JULIE F NICHOLS -- —�_ J'. CI10 \/FV CC'A CAllrl R CIIUCCTC AT1111 rc+C .. .. .- -... _.. -. _ - COD1995.5790 351 S GULFVIEW BLVD CMP INSTALLED AWNING WITHOUT PERMIT JULIE F NICHOLS COD2001.00285 351 S GULFVIEW BLVD CMP magal freestanding menu sign, signage attached to palm tree, and illegally displaying Superbowl ba__nn_ers. _IS_EA�FO_OD�& SUNSET AT JULIES JULIE NICHOLS COD2001.03295 351 S GULFVIEW BLVD CMP Fence around dumpster needs repair JULIE S SALT WATER CAFE JULIE NICHOLS FLS 00.01 -01 351 S GULFVIEW BLVD __........_._ .................. ....._...................................................................... OCL9046401 351 S GULFVIEW BLVD SGN1989- 030665 1351 S GULFVIEW BLVD FMLNLHY'b bUU I H tiLALH PRESTON, MICHAEL APR To add 469 square feet to an existing restaurant 267 square feet wig be enclosed and 2D2 square feet w01 be FLEX STAND STEVE SPENCER . ............................. .................. _ ........ _ .................... _. .... _. ... ---- ............. ................................................. _ . ...... _ - - - -- . ISS RESTAURANT FRENCHY'S SOUTH BEACH CAFE INC FRENCHY'S SOUTH I CMP FACE CHANGE OF POLE SIGN FOR RESTAURANTSIGN WORK ONLY JULIE TIERMAN JULIE TIERMAN COD1995.5790 351 S GULFVIEW BLVD CMP INSTALLED AWNING WITHOUT PERMIT JULIE F NICHOLS COD2001.00285 351 S GULFVIEW BLVD CMP magal freestanding menu sign, signage attached to palm tree, and illegally displaying Superbowl ba__nn_ers. _IS_EA�FO_OD�& SUNSET AT JULIES JULIE NICHOLS COD2001.03295 351 S GULFVIEW BLVD CMP Fence around dumpster needs repair JULIE S SALT WATER CAFE JULIE NICHOLS FLS 00.01 -01 351 S GULFVIEW BLVD __........_._ .................. ....._...................................................................... OCL9046401 351 S GULFVIEW BLVD SGN1989- 030665 1351 S GULFVIEW BLVD FMLNLHY'b bUU I H tiLALH PRESTON, MICHAEL APR To add 469 square feet to an existing restaurant 267 square feet wig be enclosed and 2D2 square feet w01 be FLEX STAND STEVE SPENCER . ............................. .................. _ ........ _ .................... _. .... _. ... ---- ............. ................................................. _ . ...... _ - - - -- . ISS RESTAURANT FRENCHY'S SOUTH BEACH CAFE INC FRENCHY'S SOUTH I CMP FACE CHANGE OF POLE SIGN FOR RESTAURANTSIGN WORK ONLY JULIE TIERMAN JULIE TIERMAN FLS 00.01 -01 351 S GULFVIEW BLVD __........_._ .................. ....._...................................................................... OCL9046401 351 S GULFVIEW BLVD SGN1989- 030665 1351 S GULFVIEW BLVD FMLNLHY'b bUU I H tiLALH PRESTON, MICHAEL APR To add 469 square feet to an existing restaurant 267 square feet wig be enclosed and 2D2 square feet w01 be FLEX STAND STEVE SPENCER . ............................. .................. _ ........ _ .................... _. .... _. ... ---- ............. ................................................. _ . ...... _ - - - -- . ISS RESTAURANT FRENCHY'S SOUTH BEACH CAFE INC FRENCHY'S SOUTH I CMP FACE CHANGE OF POLE SIGN FOR RESTAURANTSIGN WORK ONLY JULIE TIERMAN JULIE TIERMAN sra" _ - � ade Advantage..,. Tidemai -k Advantage [Robert Tefft - R He Edit Options Window Help Exit Now op.n Tosh Lict GIBE GIs ZI pose Edt Project Group Add Clono Pxccl Activity Peoplo Fee: Volootion Cordlitronz C— Note Tag. oocomenta GIs Coco M Building Construction Permik_- 7_BCR099- 12578Status EXP_ a a - Name %CGC0,67616 Updated: 112112000 RLG Atlas Address: 361 S GULFVIEV'vl BLVD Masterg : BCP1999 -12578 PRJ#]BCP 99 -12 75 8 Project ULIE S SEAFOOD AND SUNSETS---.-- Description: add 1' restraom; new deck and 2nd floor addition 267 sf Oeneraiz Type of rk - Tye of Permit: Inspector Comments: ddition _ —i Resident iaUCommerial: _ Commercial _�; Exlstut lase: Restaurant Pro osed Use:. Restaurant --- Units: Stories; Census• Bin J 43T � } _. Permit Dates _. Date Received: 12r28/199 Target Date: _ -,'i Comments Sent Date-� Date Issued: �14�'200 Date Finaled: Date Expired: E0 Fence R 'v bon Project , !: TIERNAN,JULIE JULIE TIERNAN Zoning _ FLOOD VARIANCE - DRAKAKIS, PETER PETER DRAKAKIS LIES CAFE TIERNAN, JULIE JULIE TIERNAN Tree Duec as v ABLE WINDOWS ------ _ -- JULIE S SEAFOOD & SUNSETS JULIE S SEAFOOD & SP JULIE S SEAFOOD & SUNSET S JULIE S SEAFOOD & Sl URANT JULIE S SEAFOOD & SUNSET S JULIE S SEAFOOD & St' KWrTH 30' PROTECTIVE RkILING, PORCH LIGHTS, ...... N SYSTEM _ _ WULIE S SEAFOOD & SUNSETS - -- -- ...... ........ ........._........j.....- (JULIE S SEAFOOD & SUNSET S Do & SUNSET AT JULIES JULIE S SEAFOOD & 5 ... - -- ..... JULIE S SEAFOOD SL- SEAFOOD & SUNSET t, BCP1999 -06682 1351 S GULFVIEW BLVD EXP PEDESTAL PUBLIC PAY PHONE ON EXISTING SLAB; ELECTRIC AND BUILDING NEEDED; LOCATE LETS D @ JULIES S "rJULIE PAY PHONE OWNER BCP1999 -12578 .351 S GULFVIEW BLVD ! BCP2001.01321 351 S GULFVIEW BLVD EXP CMP add t restroom• n.w deck and 2nd floor addition 267 sf PIPE AND CONNECT NATURAL GAS 2 SUNPAK HEATERS S SEAFOOD AND SUNSETS 11mCGC057616 SEAFOOD & SUNSETS C -8286 BCP2003.02291 351 S GULFVIEW BLVD CMP DECK ADDITIONIREMODEL FRENCHY'S SOUTH BEACH CBC052216 BCP2003- 02291A 351 S GULFVIEW BLVD CMP BUILDING AMENDMENT: ADD SINK AND FLOOR ORAN TO PLAN FRENCHY'S SOUTH BEACH RENOVATI CBC052216 BCP2003.02291B 351 S GULFVIEW BLVD CMP _ BUILDING AMENDMENT. "ADD ELECTRICAL SUB PANEL TO EXISTNG SERVICE* _ T FRENCHY'S SOUTH BEACH CBC052216 _ �- BCP2003.02560 351 S GULFVIEW BLVD EXP NEED SUB TRADES FINAL INSPECTIONS FOR PREVIOUS ADDITION OF 1 RESTROOM, NEW DECK AND 2ND FLOtF.RENCHY'S SOUTH BEACH CBC052216 BCP2003 -03042 351 S GULFVIEW BLVD Vol AMENDMENT: ADD SINK AND FLOOR DRApf TO PLAN FRENCHY'S SOUTH BEACH RENOVATI CBC052216 BCP2003 -03359 351 S GULFVIEW BLVD _ CMP RELOCATION AND ADDING FIRE SPRINKLER HEADS FRENCHY'S SOUTH BEACH 420206000194 BCP2003- 03488T 351 S GULFVIEW BLVD Vol - ___ - �� _ _.- MICHAEL G PRESTON BCP2003.03760 ;351 S GULFVIEW BLVD CMP 1(2)13 ON EQUAL CHANGE OUT PRESTON, MICHAEL CAC050443 BC_P2007.02105 351 S GULFVIEW BLVD CMP REMOVE AND REPLACE (7) SOPS TAMCO CRIMP ARCHITECTURAL METAL ROOF SYSTEM FRENCY'S SOUTHBEACH CHRISTOPHER S YOU BCP2007. 08208 351 S GULFVIEW BLVD ACT UPGRADE ANSUL FIRE SUPPRESSION SYSTEM TO MEET UL 300 STANDARD - _ IFRENCHYS SOUTH BEACH JOHN M EMMERT BIZ2006.01549 351 S GULFVIEW BLVD CMP Banners on first tloor,'Budweiser & Becks FRENCHY'S SOUTH BEACH MICHAEL G PRESTON CDC2007 -01955 351 S GULFVIEW BLVD NVO Property maintenance FRENCHY'S SOUTH BEACH MICHAEL G PRESTON COD1992 -4278 351 S GULFVIEW BLVD _ CMP MNAMORTIZATION JULIE FNICHOLS_ COD1995.1098 1351 S GULFVIEW BLVD CMP SIGN SURVEY SEAFOOD & SUNSETSATJUUE'S �- JULIE F NICHOLS COD1995.5790 351 S GULFVIEW BLVD CMP INSTALLED AWNING WITHOUT PERMn' JULIE F NICHOLS COD2001.00285 1351 S GULFVIEW BLVD _ CMP magal freestanding menu sign, signage, attached to palm tree, and inegagy displaying Superbo_wl banners. SEAFOOD & SUNSET AT JULIES JULIE NICHOLS COD2001.03295 351 S GULFVIEW BLVD CMP Fence around dumpster needs repair - JULIE S SALTWATER CAFE JULIE NICHOLS FLD2008 -04009 351 S GULFVIEW BLVD REC FRENCHY'S SOUTH BEACH PRESTON, MICHAEL G FLS 00 -01 -01 _.....-.--_..- ...................... _..._........ OCL9046401 351 S GULFVIEW BLVD ...... -............................................-.....---- ................ -._ ...................... 351 S GUL_FVIEW BLVD APR .. ............................ ISS To add 469 square feet to an existing restaurant 267 square feet will be enclosed and 2D2 square feet �a11 be ........................................................ _ ............................................................ _.._.._ ...... -.-........................--_....-----.-. .............. ........... ......................._... - - -- RESTAURANT FLEX STAND FRENCHY BEACH CAFE INC STEVE SPENCE R R FRENCHY'S SOUTH BE JULICET ER ;=;; _ _ _ _ -� — 'SS_SOUTH SGN1989- 030665 351 S GULFVIEW BLVD CMP FACE CHANGE OF POLE SIGN FOR RESTAURANTSIGN WORK ONLY - T� (JULIE TIERMAN Close current window W U' m 0 Vj 0 n n s t� aj ® ® Calendar -i 3:;9 AM ,Tidemark Advantage [Robert Tefft R_T;_ _ LFBe Edit Options Viiindow Help r Exit ,fkk.q Open Task UA OBE GIs GIs El, a_r..ISX V X L Clow Yi- Add Dekte Sign Off print Documents ® Building Construction Permit -- BCP1999- 12578. -- Status FXP-- . Big _ Name:. 000O67616 Updated. 1/21/2000 RLG Atlas Genera! Address: 351 S GULFVIEW BLVD Master; BCP1999- 125181 PRJ4,: BCP1999 -12678 Project ULIE S SEAFOOD AND SUNSETS } Genera 2 ®Activity.fo.r,BCP.1999 -. .1,2578 _. Desc ion Landscape Final Dls Done B . Date1 Oa e2 Date3 No #es 6/122000 6/1212000 - - -- -- - °- Eg$g ed on 2 1-AUG -2003 1100NE 004 Traffic Final Override - Parcel Holds DONE I Exp C -M 2!202003 4x003 if 2242003 2124_2003 2202003 - JMP EXTEND EXPIRATION DATE ................ _._..._..._......._.......... -- - -._.. Override - Parcel Holds. DONE JMP . JMP __.. .................... ......................._2202OD3 ................................ ... 21202003 EXTEND FOR FRLAL INSP (JMP) - OK PER ROB HAYS ...... ................._.._...............................................................-----.._.......................-..._.........._._.............__..._......... .................... ........... .......... _..........._._.....---._.....__..._........................................................................._........_..................._._.__......._ ............................._. Expuedon 10-JUL-2001 204`Fmet - Electrical cal DONE DONE EXP ............ IdEH .---.................._................................................. it92QD1 11102001 71102001 ........_.................._._. 1!102001 _..._._ ......................_........_......-__..__........................................................................................._......._._....._.._......_..._..................... ................................. _...... ..... _ ....................................... _._...._...................................... ............_.._... ........... . Scheduled by a contractor via Hello! on 0110192001 at 16:10:14. Contact: (727) 343 -3189. 1202-1st Rough - Electrical DONE MEH 11202000 11212000 11222000 JScbeduled by a contractor vita Helot on I l2020D0 at 16:43:10. Contact: (727) 343-3189. 202'tst Rough - Electrical DONE MEH 11/20/2000 '11212000 11122/2000 107'Frame DONE VWP 11/202000 11212000 11212000 Parcel Hold Override REM 11202000 Condition Code: DEVO Value: Description Oev Order Hold EXTEND EXPIRATION DATE DONE REM 11202000 Y -- —� Extension Granted DONE REM 11202000 11202000 ComputerAutmoaticaly ex,-,ended permit to 111D212000 but date of last completed inspection was 051022000 so this permit is eligible for extension under the �. _ Exptred on 02 -NOV -2000 DONE EXP 1122004 305 Final - Plumbing PASS THC 5!12000 5=000 522OD0 Scheduled by a contractor via Helot on 05/01 MOD at 14:10:06. Contact: (727) 734 - 2879.. 20211st Rough - Electrical DONE MEH 4202000 4212000 4242ODO Scheduled by a contractor via Helol on 042020DD at 16:12:45. Contact: (727)343-31.19. -- - - 917 Roof in Progress DONE VWP 4202000 4212000 4202000 _ - 107-Frame DONE VWP 41192000 4202000 4202004 135 °Nail -Structural Sheath —DONE VWP 4202000 4212000 4/20/2000 202'tst Rough - Electrical DONE MEH I 41192000 4202400 4202000 _ 302 2nd Rough - Plumbing PASS THC_1 4/612000 4172000 4!72000 301 1st Rough - Plumbing PASS THC 31f420DO 31152000 3/152000 Scheduled by a contractor via Held on 0311 4 2 00 0 at 1 1:57:27. Conta -c (727) 7'34- 2879. - - 303 Sewer - Plumbing PASS T11C _ 311420DO 3/152000 3/1512000 Scheduled by a contractor via Hello! on 03/142000 at 11:58:03. Contact: (727) 734 -2879. 1061Slab DONE VWP 3WOOO 3142000 3/32000 — - - 118'Partial Frame DONE_ VWP 3IN2000 342000 313/2000 sleepers for deck outside and deck boards OI- FooterlElec.Band DONE VWP 3/3/2004 3/42000 3t320DO 0 Placard ............................................. ........................_.._ -.- DRC Review DONE ......... DONE K B _ ........................................... L_F .................._..._...- 1142000 -- -- 1/420D0 2/142000 ..-._................................................................._. 2114200D _...._......................._. ---._ ........................................ ............ . .... ............................... _......_...._.............._............ ............................................................................... __._...__... O Engineering Rev! ew ....- --- ..- _....._............ Placard DONE......... DONE' K- B......... K_B 1228/1999 1212 &1999 21!4200D 2/142000 Must pay S4,997.10 for payment in lieu of for retention at the time of permitting. j ......-- - ... ......................... -- -- --....... _... .................. ................. .. _...._.._.. _ ........._........_ .._...._......................_ ... ............................ ............................_ O Traffic Review DONE M G 122811999 1212 &1999 2//12000 Approved as noted / TIF due O mechanical Review DONE K S 1228/!999 122811999 2P112000 see case conditions O Building Review IDONE K_S IW811999 1228 /1999 2/11200,0 see case conditions 0 Plumbing Review IDONE K_S 1212 &1999 t2/2£d1999 2111n000 0 Landscape Review IDONE MTP 1222/1999 1228/1999 222000 see conditions O —_ Zoning Review Zoning _ - - -- Fire Plan ndment 9i ,DONE ...__ MTP _._..— 1212 &1999 _ -- 112412000 122811999 222004 See Zoning Conditions DONE J_D _ ---. -- 142WODO O Electrical Review a DONE T _K _S 12/2811999 12_2811999 111 WOOD comply 1999 NEC_ / N_FPA 70. - O Forestry Review NA R_A 1228/1999 1212&1999 11512DOO O 0 Need Tree Permit or No Tree DONE R A_ 1212 &1999 122 &1999 1228/1999 12nat1999 1WD00 1/312000 Igave to rick albee jpd and gave to rick albee� Need ClearingfGrubbing Appl DONE R_A - lizo Ready RIP-Mg 5" LN U15M.- %kridetnarkAdv antage.,. 110-Tidemark Advantage [Robert Tefft,:. R—Tj.,__7. LFite Edit Options viindow Help 0, bit N.. Op,. Twit Lin QBE GIs 01.c. Vi— Add Dekt. sip Off print D.—I.. Occupational License -- OCL9046401 Status ISS Name: FRENCH`/'S SOUTH BEACH CAFE INC Updated: 3f12/2003 JIVIP Atlas, C� C-Imwqt to es -- Address: 361 S GULFVIEW BLVD Maste PRJ#.jOCL9046401 Project jF kEN��Y:�SSQUTH BEACH CAFE INC Economic Econ Hego Description' RESTAURANT Dev 72811998 a t r ie. 7198 BATCH 71272002 City Location-JFLVR—V, Date Ope ned: . . .. . ................... . . . ..................... 11, FY 02/03 BATCH N Activity, forOCL9046401 Description Renewal Notice Renewal Notice Renewal Notice F--,ReneNval Notice :Renewal Notice �Renewal Notice Issue Lice-ase Issue License - RENEWAL Issue License - RENEWAL Issue License - RENEWAL issue License - RENEWAL - * ............................. W Delinquent Renewal Notice Parcel Hold Override Issue License - RENEWAL jssue License - RENEWAL Issue License - RENEWAL State License Verified W Addiftiona I Requirements Needed Reinspection Override - Parcel Holds License Transferred 4sue License - RENEWAL e atice ,Issue License - RENEWAL i Renewal Notice Issue L cease - RENEWAL Renewal Notice ISSUE - Business Tax Renewal Renewal Nofce 1ISSUE-Bushess. Tax Renewal SGN1989-030665 1351 S GULRAEW BLVD M BW Ka ............. REM SLW SLW WBS SYS -J—Nlc JC JC -iLw SLW SYS SYS Da et Da e2 Dates to es -- 712511 9%97 7197 BATCH 721/1999 7M BATCH 72811998 7198 BATCH 71272002 FY 02/03 BATCH 7101 BATCH 7/1812000 7100 BATCH LV1711M 5/17/1999 . ........... . ....... . . . . . ......... 12/10/2000 ...................................... ..... . .......... * ...... 120/2001) ..... . ... ............ ........ . ........ . . ......................................... . . . ...... .... . . ......................................... . ...................................... - .............................. . .... . . . .. . . . . . .......................................................... . .. . ......... ........................... . . ... . . . . ... . ............. . ............ ................................. . ........ 12/OD -DLO 121212000 Condition Code- DEVO Value: Descripfion:Dev Order Hold 12J21/200D 81142001 0102 9252002 2002-2003 I/32003 RECD COPY OF STATE HEALTH WSPECTION FROM DBPR & CLOSTIG STATEMENT 1192003 1132003 - HOLDING FOR ORIGINAL LICENSE, JMC 2!1712003 I192043 1HOLDING FOR ORICKAL LICENSE (NOTALL INFO HAS BEEN CHANGED). IF NO ORIGINAL LICENSE, I WILL START ANOTHER CASE AND CHARGE STAI`)ARD ................. 1/912003 1/912003 102-03 71112003 —62120E 103104 263 :2004 —7rMOO4 04105 91912004 2004-2005 7=005 FY20DS-2006 i665 :206i 712112006 ZODS - 2007 &1&2006 2005 -2007 7/M7 8202007 2007=08 2007 - 2008 'RE 1!ISS I S TA U RANT :�IFRENCHYS SOUTH BEACH CAFE INC F ENCHYS SOUTH BEN4 1CMP IFACE CHANGE OF POLE SIGN FOR RESTAURANTSIGN WORK ONLY !JULIE TIERMAN IJULIE TIERMAN 10 Property Appraiser General Information: 7/29/15/52380/000/0700 Card 1 Page 1 of 4 Interactive Map of this Comparable Sales Back to Query New Tax Collec Question/Conunent about this RUM 1,1�11i1k tcGSUlw ocal�ll IIIlU1.111aUU11 Jaz c 07/29/15/52380/000 /0700 Building 1 Data Current as of March 30 2008 1 i [2:22 pm Wednesday April 2] Nonresidential Property Owner, Address, and Sales Print a Restaurant /Lounge/Drive- Pro�ertUse: 325 in ..,3: LLOYD - WHITE - SKINNER SUB LOT 70 2008 Exemptions Homestead: No Use: 0% Ownership: 0% Tax Exempt: 0% Government: No Institutional: No Agricultural: $0 Historic: $0 2007 Value 2007 Tax Information Comparable Sales value based on sales from 2005- Tax District: CW 2006: $0 Millage: 19.9371 Just/Market Value: $603,000 Non Ad Valorem Assessments: $.00 Assessed Value/ SOH Cap: $603,000 Taxes: $12,022.10 History Taxable Value: $603,000 Taxes without Save - Our -Homes cap: $12,022.10 A significant taxable value increase may occur Taxes without any exemptions: $12,022.10 when sold. Click here for details. Owner /Mailing Address Property Address Sale Date Book/Page Price Q/U V/I PRESTON, MICHAEL G THE 12/2002 12446/1256 $925,000 U I 419 EASTSHORE DR 351 S GULFVIEW BLVD CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 10/1982 5417/1720 $150,000 Q I 2028 Plat Year Plat Book/Page(s) Parcel Information 1925 013/ 012 - 01.3 Book/Page: Land Use: 12446../..1256 Restaurants /Cafeteri... (21) Census Tract: Evacuation Zone: A 260.02 http:// www. pcpao.org /general_nadet.php ?pn= 1529075238000007001 4/2/2008 Property Appraiser General Information: 07/29/15/52380/000 /0700 Card 1 � Page 2 of 4 Seawall: Land Use Restaurants /Cafeterias(21) Foundation: Continuous Footing Floor System: Wood with Subfloor Exterior Wall: Siding Average Roof Frame: Gable & Hip Roof Cover: Metal Shingle Height Factor: 0 Floor Finish: Pine / Soft Wood Interior Finish: Drywall Party wall: None Structural Frame: None Cabinet & Mill: Average Quality: Average Heating & Air: Heating & cooling Package Electric: Average Bath Tile: Floor and Half Wall Fixtures: 9 Total Units: 0 Year Built: 1946 Effective Age: 25 Other Depreciation: 0 Functional Depreciation: 0 Economic Depreciation: 0 Land Information Frontage: None Land Size 60 x 110 Structural Elements View: Unit Value Units Method 150.00 6,600.00 S Open Dlot in New Window View Floor: 1 2 here if screen is blank ;Click http: / /www.pcpao.org /general _ nadet.php ?pn = 1529075238000007001 4/2/2008 Property Appraiser General Information:.Q,7/29/15/52380/000 /0700 Card 1 http://www.pcpao.org/general—nadet.php?pn=1529075238000007001 Page 3 of 4 Factor Effective Ft2 1.00 Sub Area information Description Building Finished Ft2 Gross Area Ft2 Base Area 1,537 1,537 Open Porch Finished 583 431 Utility.Room Unfinished 86 Open Porch Unfinished 292 Upper Story Base Area 648 648 Total Building Finished SF: 2,185 Total Gross SF: 2,994 Nonresidential Extra Features Description Dimensions Value/Unit Units Total NewValue Fireplace AVG $2,500.00 1 $2,500.00 Asphalt 1000SF $1.75 1000 $1,750.00 Fire Sprinkler $2.00 2185 $4,370.00 Shed .110SF $15.00 110 $1,650.00 http://www.pcpao.org/general—nadet.php?pn=1529075238000007001 Page 3 of 4 Factor Effective Ft2 1.00 1,537 .30 129 .40 34 .20 58 .90 583 Total Effective SF: 2,342 Depreciated Value Year $1,850.00 1946 $1,750.00 Unknown $3,410.00 1991 $790.00 1975 4/2/2008 Interactive Map of this Comparable Sales Back to Query New Tax Collector Question/Comment about this parcel Listing Results Search Information page http:// www. pcpao.org /general_nadet.php ?pn= 1529075238000007001 4/2/2008 i � xm }H � s WV x I / F�gr�rT Ill- A 7: d I W`' Ilfi gd _ O jjI (`513 II I rP 488 fi•7 .,/ O 1 "'S °5� I /I 35 9. SO i cjj a II I N It I s.1 ,VIII I l 73 AMEI86�APlr >� ' +,'� Turlblock ^cT1^11 Waa � apa.>a:.w. -'vu. w low now rn.melc ur:T.n tl.saamaar euEOas.�wx wan o.R mn txn, �.µ ue rcewn�ra uune nvn Ndnl ;8�e�lvo xeLlk "Tba. „,,, b. 11m�ulA a<t a u eanwu. .n brWy 0 b,�e OyS.eeArWGe:alarxup vom+La«; rt Ae� w- kwAw ![51. cif pn ew.*s4rs emu• � �l.L'Q BYI-i 01, !� ®I ■1 ®-e m ir3 ® /,F n.4 6pnartu� e..r•I ingr 6w�pwiwY N6vk.0 3AM1 uwr va a.rnYM of i�Ul WI . ��ksiP,ervu�i w.'a! T4 aM a SmiJn �a-n v .��.. amw afASTMC6>.ls. a':iryrn amm .wl.m miml Y�rnu3.4;1e :: -, r �Te l w.a bK164' Tndku 4e me I,.veM vJ P°ni0v' 38 V Martr..rin IM4+: )5 O�: PrOe:i rHprl:�rt yy1>DelY..url�TkeM 4aT _ .tl pike l5'LAn a � N eer f r5 wl v .- a.inuTNU1!sNykuel L RECEIVED MAR 18 2009 P'1 AKWn o�+ n r-vw A v,,r. - .d LOT 69 �f' � -.b / a0B 848 �4 �4. f '•• ,' fr r.,e Y c I Y� Sow py7 p l a efACiy 3S p r / o / 5,26 - 4.99 y .75 nr. 3 STOR o-reL 71 MaS5 ONRY } 4.11 r �" r►Ir .aa.y4.4• hF 8 8M a ae2 I a..L. 411113 N. l� ) 000 (BdIIH TO E■lL PVMT 000 90UM TOIX MAT 36 10 REM 15.31 (FAST TO"),) ) 46.3{ /EA8T TO BLDG.) 3.88 (EAST TOIXPVMT.) O.W (FA4TTO PVMrJ .. - 4,57 _ �j. 4.56 . •1wNx 170 YaR YA1f. 0E7197Y toarrE AREA TAOE: 5,M.1 5AC) B,eo3.0 eF 18.15AC) •�. _. y�� '~"� 8URDINGAREA(1BrI-): t,sel.WW. t.]eT.a58F. ABRMLT•CONLREfE: 4,420.888F. (0.815x+1 45MI.WW. CONCRETE PAVEMENTDE -r- �. 46 TOTALIMPERVIOIAI R 5.88] -0B W.(OAO M) 8.31].00 BF. (O.BB IHi) -yy1 xn �•� 4M TOTAL OPEN SPADE 815189F. (041 AL) 268.148F. (0.01 AC) VENuF H A 4.29 xr �' _ - 11. THERE AMNOENV -ENTALL MIQIJEARFA90N , �I fi _ 12. ALL UNPAVED DISTURBED -1 WITNw 1-1 -WAYS WSODDED 'OnstruC(NN1% MDp PL TED.AROWUSEPERMITW BEI- JIMDFORLMDBCApING MD ALL OTHER IMPROVEMENTS WIINN R4W. I lT 13.80LID- ITECO-TIMCURPENTL I- IDFDBYCT•OFCIFMWATEIt 14.PEDBTRIAN BIDEWALI(88HALL 8E INSTALLED IN ACCgipM10E WIlH THECIT' M1M Ef 4 OFCLFMWATER9 REOUIREMENTSMDSTMDARDB .ALLP1tOPOeED �■ 91DEWAl1(88HALL NOT EXCEED ACROSS3LOPEOF 2%. • erwf 15. GUTTERS, DOWNBPOUT8, UTIUI WXES,ANDOTNERMIBC. BRE FB(I11RES •- _�Y` WILL BE PAINTED,BCREENED.OR OTHERW83E CONCENHI, OR BIIIIUED N `- Y� BUIIDNOMCHRECTURE PIMP, ' 18.ALLUNUBEDMIVEWAYIMU8T BETE EDMDREPLACED WRx CARS, •�_ ra M'�rr�A SIDEWALIL MDlMDBCAPING TO MATCH EXIBI8IG CONDIIIOf18 q3 SET1FR 17. PAAI(INGTABULATION 25508.F. RESTMRMix]t58PIL48rI0008F.dCfA 4 ( • 1 :0.0WtJEh R 1638 D: 18. THISPROPERTYMPEMBTOLIEWRHINFLOOD -EW(F1EV.14) A88HOWNIXITNEFLOODIMURANOEMTEMM ,COMIAkIRYPM¢ 4 MA ma 0121030 WG, PU0LIMEDBYTNEFEDFRIIEMERGENCYMN1A L8rB? � 4y AGENCY.EFFECTIVE:D -E. HANDICAPPED SIGN DETAIL rEELSmmDPDErwL i!_R_ 'PC ARCHITECTURE FLANN151G KEITH ZAYAC & ASSOCIATES, INC. (727) 793 -9888 www.Nelrxz4rAC.cor e. , M14D z L, ^S P4 VJ �7 5mm W �f �oa P4 i•r �F �1 .P7 Vl i -4 OF 5 71 1 + a13 4.91 As aRAFEc aces SAx� r •x, ■ e1w5 L LEGEND /f. l R5P3 77!■K l R � • • � • • � /IIDIDr E■EO/IIM 1 • P117® 501(3■■ M SAND F S y ( + +� R �� `� � G GENERAL BITE NOTES'. SAM � t. ENOINEERAAN08CAPEARCNRECT: NEITX ZAYAC 4A880CIA3FB, WC. #r � (/2]I TB3888B Bu I•Aa # o2n] IMI Fn *` 4 419EMTBHOREDR, CLEMWATER F13S/8/ y- 4• Ai. ( (TT])M0.2IA 8u (12])M80583 Fu 3. MCHRECT NAME: SPENCERMDA89OCIATEBMp1RECTURE . NC. P 308 INDM MN 8OCNe BEACH, FLORIDA 35185 M ~ 4 M-11. Fn 4. 81.111 qi NAME: SUNCOMT UWD SURVEYWG, INC. 111 FOREST LMEBBgREVARO OLDBMAR FLORIDA 9181] pmaRMwt / /81st 8541312 PNNr LOT 120 ( (813j 5558880 Fn 5.PRaECTADOMN: PARC¢IOxmcSxtasaSDAOnoroS W C C 1LFAAWATERBEAGL¢39182 4..q OAlr� B B. zmm: T(TWRL41j r RITZ MOTEL ] ].DEV¢OPED- - OVERHEAD e - TPIGAN 4 STORY MASONRY AxpSdt P AFWnq -4.18 S S. BUILDING BETRrCR4: Un5■ 1iuWMq S SE9SIIBEP. f2S15I8>Si PROPOSED VFRONT In (WEST To& 4 0.00 (W'ESTTOBLDG.) 0.00 (SOUTH TO IX w1Ar.1 OAO (SOUTH TO EX PVNN.) ,x■ �� t tO SIDE 15A5 =T.--.) TO BLDG.) 15.85(NORTHTOIXSIDG.) ((NORTH T 36 10 REM 15.31 (FAST TO"),) ) 46.3{ /EA8T TO BLDG.) 3.88 (EAST TOIXPVMT.) O.W (FA4TTO PVMrJ .. - 4,57 _ �j. 4.56 . •1wNx 170 YaR YA1f. 0E7197Y toarrE AREA TAOE: 5,M.1 5AC) B,eo3.0 eF 18.15AC) •�. _. y�� '~"� 8URDINGAREA(1BrI-): t,sel.WW. t.]eT.a58F. ABRMLT•CONLREfE: 4,420.888F. (0.815x+1 45MI.WW. CONCRETE PAVEMENTDE -r- �. 46 TOTALIMPERVIOIAI R 5.88] -0B W.(OAO M) 8.31].00 BF. (O.BB IHi) -yy1 xn �•� 4M TOTAL OPEN SPADE 815189F. (041 AL) 268.148F. (0.01 AC) VENuF H A 4.29 xr �' _ - 11. THERE AMNOENV -ENTALL MIQIJEARFA90N , �I fi _ 12. ALL UNPAVED DISTURBED -1 WITNw 1-1 -WAYS WSODDED 'OnstruC(NN1% MDp PL TED.AROWUSEPERMITW BEI- JIMDFORLMDBCApING MD ALL OTHER IMPROVEMENTS WIINN R4W. I lT 13.80LID- ITECO-TIMCURPENTL I- IDFDBYCT•OFCIFMWATEIt 14.PEDBTRIAN BIDEWALI(88HALL 8E INSTALLED IN ACCgipM10E WIlH THECIT' M1M Ef 4 OFCLFMWATER9 REOUIREMENTSMDSTMDARDB .ALLP1tOPOeED �■ 91DEWAl1(88HALL NOT EXCEED ACROSS3LOPEOF 2%. • erwf 15. GUTTERS, DOWNBPOUT8, UTIUI WXES,ANDOTNERMIBC. BRE FB(I11RES •- _�Y` WILL BE PAINTED,BCREENED.OR OTHERW83E CONCENHI, OR BIIIIUED N `- Y� BUIIDNOMCHRECTURE PIMP, ' 18.ALLUNUBEDMIVEWAYIMU8T BETE EDMDREPLACED WRx CARS, •�_ ra M'�rr�A SIDEWALIL MDlMDBCAPING TO MATCH EXIBI8IG CONDIIIOf18 q3 SET1FR 17. PAAI(INGTABULATION 25508.F. RESTMRMix]t58PIL48rI0008F.dCfA 4 ( • 1 :0.0WtJEh R 1638 D: 18. THISPROPERTYMPEMBTOLIEWRHINFLOOD -EW(F1EV.14) A88HOWNIXITNEFLOODIMURANOEMTEMM ,COMIAkIRYPM¢ 4 MA ma 0121030 WG, PU0LIMEDBYTNEFEDFRIIEMERGENCYMN1A L8rB? � 4y AGENCY.EFFECTIVE:D -E. HANDICAPPED SIGN DETAIL rEELSmmDPDErwL i!_R_ 'PC ARCHITECTURE FLANN151G KEITH ZAYAC & ASSOCIATES, INC. (727) 793 -9888 www.Nelrxz4rAC.cor e. , M14D z L, ^S P4 VJ �7 5mm W �f �oa P4 i•r �F �1 .P7 Vl i -4 OF 5 I I i I A 1 � 1 ID f l 1 d W o p fS 8 f r 4 If i ap! !r 111 �f 11 fr rr I }ff 1 ff i Ill � 11 l I1 f f! 1 ff 1 1 fl �l r f I l 4'E zt CI R / 1 ♦k 1 , McSf7)ooNgLb 3 ', #3q�SONRy L, 4- Ll r~""Wyo� • �r =,� r � � �� A„ � 1 % rwr. wv�mola n,ww aDa LOT 69 I tiy�v 1 $�3I rp w; So�;H�kvs r >i ,. 3 STORY MMA�TEL LOT 71 #358 NNY / v. f rJ l IIM ~ �ear� PIIQ q�� 2 STORY AND FRAM R ,r / LOT 11�J Pmn.it LOT 120 C az-rz MOTEL RE ~ ►. REsr ^° ar i STOR v. f FIFTH AVENUE (Undr Conatrucwb) — RECEIVED I'iA R 181009 PLANKUlk1^ -m. -- GBAP®C SCMA <rrr) PLANT LIST PALM PLANTING DETAIL 1LTA. CIVIL CNGINKRRDVG LANDRCAI•R ARCRITECTURE PL NING KEITH ZAYAC & ASSOCIATES, INC. (727) 793 -9888 H ENTERPRISE ROAD E, STE IWI SAFETY MREOR, PL 3.11 W W.KEITHZAYAC.COM oz A m a, �{b g Y �0�y Vi A S 5 OF 5 IIM ~ Pmn.it LOT 120 az-rz MOTEL OVERHEAD BUILDING --� 4 STORY MASONRY IM�K1rt8ul�q FIFTH AVENUE (Undr Conatrucwb) — RECEIVED I'iA R 181009 PLANKUlk1^ -m. -- GBAP®C SCMA <rrr) PLANT LIST PALM PLANTING DETAIL 1LTA. CIVIL CNGINKRRDVG LANDRCAI•R ARCRITECTURE PL NING KEITH ZAYAC & ASSOCIATES, INC. (727) 793 -9888 H ENTERPRISE ROAD E, STE IWI SAFETY MREOR, PL 3.11 W W.KEITHZAYAC.COM oz A m a, �{b g Y �0�y Vi A S 5 OF 5 0 3MV UL�>JUN STYLES Yq ID u rl dm - ul l L X , C, 0 0) U W a- au xi FLOOR PLAN 0 ORIGIM RECEIVED 2009 IUNW"Pesr pW,- - IT OF CLEAR19"Al'tt T.O. Roof r 22' - 4 3/4" 2nd Floor Roof r 18' - -0il 2nd Floor F.F. 9, - o„ 1st Floor F.F. 0' -0" 4 West Elevation 3/32" = V-0" PREPARED FOR ��IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII��..__ • • •-�• r PREPARED BY DESIGN STYLES ARCHITECTURE- g ;o () o Q co rwI ;a T.O. Roof 22'- 4 3/4" 2nd-Floor Roof 18' -0" NEW AWNING — 2nd Floor F.F. g1 -0" � 1st Floor F. F 01-0 /X NEW DECK ADDITION South Elevation 1. 3/32" = V-0" PREPARED FOR I IC�i.._ -•• Ili'��111 111 1 EXISTING BUILDING NEW RESTROOM ADDITION EXISTING STANDING SEAM METAL ROOF NEW LAP SIDING TO MATCH EXISTING NEW RAMP AND GUARDRAIL 7 \ 7- \� PREPARED BY DESIGN -_ STYLES ARCHITECTURE e 2 a T n ;o d cr N %j O O CO _ T.O. Roof - - 22'- 4 3/4" EXISTING STANDING -- SEAM METAL ROOF 2nd Floor ROOF 18, -0" — EXISTING LAP SIDING NEW STANDING - SEAM METAL ROOF TO MATCH 2nd Floor F.F. EXISTING 9' _ 0', NEW LAP SIDING TO MATCH -_ 1 st Floor F. F. _- EXISTING ___ -- _ _ 0' - 0" EXISTING BUILDING ye- - NEW CONSTUCTION East Elevation PREPARED FOR - 3/32" = V -0" `r PREPARED BY DESIGN STYLES ARCH ITE.CTU RE E n Gi m �4� EXISTING STANDING SEAM METAL ROOF NEW RAMP AND RAILING BEYOND North Elevation_ 2 ` 3/32" = 1 ' -0" PREPARED FOR logo, EXISTING BUILDING T.O. Roof t - ., 22'- 4 3/4" V 2nd Floor Roof 18' -0" - NEW AWNING 71- 2nd Floor F. 0F. 9' 0,. 1st Floor F.F. 0' - 0,. NEW DECK EXTENSION PREPARED BY DESIGN - S_ TYL ES ARCHITECTURE-, 7 m o m G7 N v.o o mm wim le �� �� -n � +�% � . �_ � � m r �7 ��' �� G o v� ��� '�' '. r ,� ,� air.• i i. • � A s q q �g • i \ � N .^ ryt t ► • -,. 1 00 rn o v� m� D 1 �z r � MI m Cs? N C v� ,yNlooc' i \\. V7' 2757S2 0 0 �. �-' m 0-2,s 0 0 • I a., i -f, wa. o1FYT w, e.�al _ 3.w 8� / .il,TN1F j��I♦ / d CIVIL INGINQRING L"MCA�AR'„ TRCTURI p I n...- yyc,.e A"`°^r .K •rz w°r w s'ep °�•' � '� a x I �'""�y,� I �G � -- aTM44„�.• ,pamE ,e.9aMNmoRTNTOxm.l ,s.9enw.pmnn,T°oLemoa j•� i .... / a:� a :° an n>,a w a LOT N ,s�'' _ _ � eas/ F" 1 a,.l _ (9OUTN 4a * u, -_ -- - ,alENt 46.54'MN. mw BLDa.) Ni.91'MN. (EAariL3 B1W.) 3.4. �/ mF ro PItJP. 911®} _ '�'Y KEITH ASSOCIATES A I w I �A. ev„ '`"or ('•`n�. ••ro. dj rI/ / Ca % GRAPHIC SCALE INC. /aT =O1e (727) 793 -9888 3' — — •31 .�OE — — TOT. BL°�OC•. A� iol xHTa9stuE xoAds are.oa SAFETY HARBOa PL H695 I 1 aI4 -- ` y\ ia• ..n i• e••4a:p— `�'++¢r„ M ;� . -�.r,M Ta 2.53 q.;.°b a �.-•MrOiv� l� a.m .�i) ^ I I � �' O �� $� �� w> .e "^; I gl lI i c,YP.I _ ,.PI�.L WWVI.NnrxZArAe.eoR n .n... ..v.,.a �i wf law +�� E Sal r da a�s.a`� 2 STOflY BENTS L07 179 PR°POSCO ca+wca PAwa r� �, 6 o'rv� I tY d Y �" "n''°'A°"°' - �a•°"` ,rte =c AIVD FRENRY II f o Fad. O. ENHt4LalrEnoTE3 ENOIIHRA.A)8(Y.PE ARCHREC,'. i1ffaJ1THU@! YT�R6EIE�.9l�1rtEd ! V � �' �3 `a / J / I �Lu,,.3.„ mss• „fir . . 87-0 � eRA3FTE)ir9Y 3 ilOS Fa .n 3ema - •L / ` - e.7 S .° 'cl°EAR1w�01ER�Ri�].tTn - ? Me•�, ) I SM 1 �a.• � ~'..:: C-- q Sear 'C R:T /MG3T]9 L% Q / / b� � _ ..... � _ - u> r I ±-n a ' I m,).49mea FM — I //"r a 1►.. � / I I �✓ � •... -- �,� -- - / �y�� a� a L.. i. ARO1REGT NMIE / ~pyy I/cb � VOIBOJ{30�AaaOW,fa AR011TECTlAiE NL (n)a10.ZR. Z ,i• � RTiiaG -i19] F4z 0 i` CL // •..y F la ...." 4.URVEYORNAWi hO mi 8 w aN PaYN,lt Y LOT 120 91a1Cd16T !AND BLMVEYNG NL 0 IDMK F M3J 6 E AAD m > co U tr/ I .M .w• �` `mar 4(81311— n P ml37 ee4n34z vnvls (8131a Fr a m¢ Z I » I.Ya�^.Y 5 PROTECT ADDRESS f00 I {' an PARS G. W¢Rtsw06OOa°Tm 35,s U C 3 •- a [ ll ) / / / I / / _ ig /� R T •ray TSmu<na l+wms =. 1 My'I./�� 1� cMq 3 STORYO ' ocruTlSR�y ql '...4 sr1 ap - --� -� ^�_°"�°^ro u� +� f� TC 6 ZCfLNG. S R� 1 I CI 1 oEVELOPm usE olurvlev3Lw T (r-T) ROURI9T) aEaiAURwi U m mo j a fi LOT `♦! 71 1355 SOIyRY RH BUILDING - 9uemau uRE I�,S Uri• z / lll l / °^ x 1 •"°+ -- 4 STORY OTAL SITE AREA MASONRY .SU9dNG SETA «s BRO i4a 913 Aq E- � V E- ll � i m�e � rri SIDEWALK TYPICAL SECTION � N78 9 I y GONCRET E SIDEWALK CONSTRUCTION DETAIL NTB r 4YV -a.> A.pholl Parton "� Unaw 8N.g Ne O ✓. E EN amwr 1.T Mw. EaE9Tro0lDR.) ow M. aEerro RID0.) -ter yI �S'� V I �'""�y,� I �G � -- aTM44„�.• ,pamE ,e.9aMNmoRTNTOxm.l ,s.9enw.pmnn,T°oLemoa ■ Sao �80tIiH ro eLno 11 Oo0 �90U1MTOIRDO. - 9.00 TOIXPVMTI F F" 1 a,.l _ (9OUTN 4a * u, -_ -- - ,alENt 46.54'MN. mw BLDa.) Ni.91'MN. (EAariL3 B1W.) mF ro PItJP. 911®} — — — Ar ,9. -EMI. TABLE AE 18iMIG PIIDPOfim. — SF(alsAq 99oa14WJ.15Aq 8UL0.10 AREA(,BT FLO0f9. ,.59T.,58F. p.30 FARj 1„6148F Ia.',Fm ASPINLTA'ANCRETE 4.m898F. 091 Nlq 3 A51 Rm FIFTH -19.1. AVENUE — — — — — _ TOT.IMPElMOI1S ARFA'. 5.999.938f. p.9118/R�1 5493wv �,�D➢Doo9131� 1WS8Al(,8,� �UrlGef COIISiNO(ION) ♦ln 3 �15 A(.7 i5018i E.1➢0l0AL'1 •31 .�OE — — TOT. BL°�OC•. A� I I 1i •m_IIII II i,�T r 1 '.� ����r.�•r 3 ' — _ 13. ALLlINPAVmdSTLWLED AREA3VATHIN RgHTOFYIAY 9HaLL3E3000ED A PUNTED.ARBWUSEPERMn VALLBE REWIi®FOR IANOBCAPNO AW NOALL OTHER IMPROVEMENTS VATNW RAW N ,39Clm VASrE WIJ.ECTX)N CURRENTLY PRJVGED BY CrrYOF QFAINMTER t4 PEDISrR1AN 99£NNLKS SW3LL 8E NBT.Lm NAOCORbJlf£VAM i REOUIREMEMS AND STANDARDS. ALL PROPOSED - C W > - 03 - O Z N saFAMLxs swAU noT ExcgoA csroB9aLOPE azx Is GUTTERS. DOVrM9PpRS. -LRY BOZE. ANOOTNElt MBO 81TE FIXTUIES --PA OR OTHERVABE CDNCFAL81, OR &ENDEDN 1 1 BUILONGAI— II L LNLl9ED ORNEYNYS MUST SE REMOVm ANDREDLACED WRNtlIRB. ,6 sCEVALK ANp IANDBWNG t0 RATLH Ez9Twp CONpTpN90P BET,ER. BE E t. PARIUNG iABUtATICN]isp S.F REBTAURANTa Tt35PA(£Bn90DSF gOFA Fa Ez fi NG ROP0.9ED RF` a4 t tGICV BS e1 NAM 4 OF 5 E EN NAM 4 OF 5 S -WA g/ I � � �� ► SrGR NgL�s ,...w_ c[m�ruc scALr z� } C sae t 6.55 •.n - a �. a I am ai �,w wd ',.w'pM a / swe a wauomty, n.Nnxc pE,K aa+ aao r nc 4r ab "'N"•u w '� ' .„, e w as .a a LOT 89 pp W � • da„ w r«. _ 1 / tll Eli rya I „ 2 I T _ am . 2.53 +•tay�°° I I + I y l i' U r o„ h. r•,,, r,,,,. �Z STORY"�cn3T,_ N LOT 119 I O s �a -i.� " r ra .xi NC -,�ana aa� t •w.;h„`- ... -.'•,( ; RAy -a.o aay y77y t ~ RF T �' 11 r I r na• yrl so .e'�H 8T( [ 47 , / _ _ � •' .ass r l aaaid •R ha a' a, , / —a .Z* , an av'ph eIn em � ;," •7 LOT 120 P,l l I f, ) p, / ! r na, R rdp�a, a,•�.e `! °'+ a „rr • _ 3ef�" ^ "° 9 ..a'ap — —- RIp—M r3 �2 N ORY }I r LOT 7 #3S.tRY BUILDI NG „— ate. 4 STOHYspA80NNY ppwwrr�� Asphalt er ParYinq I / I , a•' ✓Y ,' e� \ Und Bu1aNq La II _ _ 11 ' •aarur +4.47 3.11 FIFTH AVENUE. as I (Under construction) I 4.29 I 4.31 PLANT LIST »ton a �� meaeHele taAmamm 1® /I I '& PLANT SPACING DETAIL (SECTION) PALM PLANTING DETAIL N.T.S. KEITH ZAYAC & ASSOCIATES, INC. (727) 793 -9888 01 HNTCRPHIafi ROAD & eT£ 404 3ne6ry xAaeoH. ac s4a95 WWW.NRITNZAVAC.CW dra� � Q d Z 5 Z -- u t` i` O ¢ m¢ Z V C j �— a rx �o a m u c z 0.F F Z �3 J C S F ` s� N.aTed 5 OF 5 lid�i'�_v��'::°� 5���'1��vNtf i� �VOV i/ Y �i�� i�. 9001 c il-"l IVN-%!: d'Zlo Z C' c yiN IN", id ..i Booz 1/ , L -1 , WN1114 z;o -. .1 \ BLUE TRIM YELLOW SIDING i. r.:i .epp_ ..77 OUOG ;i 4 � : . �....ii .'.s... , �� i'r�v,v - L. :T i`�yrY Y•li�� �� 8002 � t ,• .' 1 .���c,�,�,0 I I I 0 I I 0 I 0 I N I I � I 0 I z 1 _ _IJ I O OI I EXISTING I I DRIVE FOR DELIVERIES -� NE 14 GATE FOR RES[TURANT ACCESS 1 I I EXTEND EXISTING DECK 60' -0" -� REMOVE EXISTING PARKING -NEW PAVED ACCESS HVV FREEZER COOLER POTSNK 10'x8' 8'x8' NEW KITCHEN EXPANSION 28' x 29 NEW DECK O 15x32 MEN C NEW DOORS REMOVE EXISTING DOORS EXISTING RESTARAUNT 60' -0" WORN LINE OF 2ND / FLOOR ABOVE J EXISTING l DECK NEW SEATING IN PLAZA Nl NEW RAMP RLNCH NEW STAGE f/ 2 6'x12' L TNG 012008 NORTH PROPOSED SITE PLAN PL+E'VN,,T' C; SCALE: 1 18' = 1' -0' ✓ rJ. ezAv t I Goot, ft-" �O o O O O ri N °-T66;p EAST ELEVATION SCALE: 1/4" = P -0" rlN-fw lbXIS'CIOla. y Lil g 0 z Q Z CL �� Z uI .0 Q �� 4° Q o 0 NEW EXST NORTH ELEVATION (SOUTH ELEVATION SIMILAR) SCALE: 1/4" = 1' -0" LEGAL DESCRIPTION 8E DINNING AT A POINT 19000 FEET WEST AND 25.00 FEET NORTH OF THE SOU THEAST CORNER OF THE SOUTH 112 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 6, TOWNSHIP 29 SOUTH, RANGE 19 EAST, HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY, FLORIDA FOR A POINT OF BEGINNING'. THENCE RUN WEST 90.00 FEET ALONG THE NORTH BOUNDARY LINE OF OSBORNE AVENUE. THENCE RUN NORTH 150,00 FEET: THENCE RUN WEST 355.00 FEET; THENCE RUN SOUTH 150.00 FEET TO THE NORTH BOUNDARY LINE OF OSBORNE AVENUE: THE WEST 25.00 FEET: THENCE NORTH 305.00 FEET: THENCE EAST 470.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 305.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. k NOTE 8 CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WTH THE LATEST EDITIONS OF FLORIDA OEPARTNENT OF TRANSPORTATION. ROApWAV AND TRAFFIC DESIGN STANDARDS AND CITY OF g CLEARWATER CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS. d L0T�1J V 1 PREPARED FOR Frenchy's South Beach, Inc. 419 E. SHORE DRIVE CLEARWATER BEACH, FL 33767 PROJECT LOCATION FRENCHY'S SOUTH BEACH CAFE PARCEL ID #: 07/29/15/52380/000 /0700 351 S. GULFVIEW BLVD. CLEARWATER, FLORIDA ISSUE DATE: 04.01.08 PREPARED BY: KEITH ZAYAC & ASSOCIATES, INC CIVIL ENGINEERING - LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE - PLANNING 701 ENTERPRISE ROAD E, STE, 404 - SAFETY HARBOR, FL 34695 ( 7 2 7 ) 793 -9888 WWW.KEITHZAYAC.COM ES 9351 - LC 3694313 IN— COVER SHEET 1 GENERALNOTES 2 DEMOLITION PLAN 3 SITE, GRADING 6 DRAINAGE PLAN oZ 17 5 SURVEY '?t L --j a 1- 666 -71A6 w n ° Vor... rTl %7 L0T�1J V 1 PREPARED FOR Frenchy's South Beach, Inc. 419 E. SHORE DRIVE CLEARWATER BEACH, FL 33767 PROJECT LOCATION FRENCHY'S SOUTH BEACH CAFE PARCEL ID #: 07/29/15/52380/000 /0700 351 S. GULFVIEW BLVD. CLEARWATER, FLORIDA ISSUE DATE: 04.01.08 PREPARED BY: KEITH ZAYAC & ASSOCIATES, INC CIVIL ENGINEERING - LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE - PLANNING 701 ENTERPRISE ROAD E, STE, 404 - SAFETY HARBOR, FL 34695 ( 7 2 7 ) 793 -9888 WWW.KEITHZAYAC.COM ES 9351 - LC 3694313 IN— COVER SHEET 1 GENERALNOTES 2 DEMOLITION PLAN 3 SITE, GRADING 6 DRAINAGE PLAN 4 LANDSCAPE PLAN 5 SURVEY { PROJECT LOCATION COVER SHEET 1 of 5 CIVIL ENGINEERING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE GENERAL CONSTRUCTION NOTES r IiiEA•AT1R,1 WEw t0 iK nwv.O ltvM1 IOGTIOK, FIEWTIOb. AIOMNENBHZEOENBfWOUTME6 ,eniLOTUEB,AM APE eXaw AOPFaMTOMlEer IKOBwrld,vAluwe ArrK CLEMING AND SITE PREPARATION NOTES r PPILN roAM'ertEaFAbK.,u TREEe eINAMt tOnENAW dTKNxrtnLCTOx NWbbwiY PAOIFRmINAOmxMK EVerXMLOOU KeuurdW AOENma LR[OIpVWl2.rtb MOdfMCrOW IIEBNNeMItm TO NUM.vNTZT I w00000armcn xOTNEEB eXpw TO nMMNenui eEnrOrtawrwvf wMT,Ex EROSION CONTROL GENERAL NOTES I EgNENr WMWR KNURES BMW OOIIRr wTX eiATE MOLOGLB00. gq IETAT exert iArgx e,MO Ma,gM[Nl iO rnEVEM� —N-0—Ml NMLEMTIOe wixx inE9 a mtlNlie MIDRMt�4,16xt - FFJ.t1AEDAAECnN3KiX'B�W_wtvwal OODKrNK tlx'ME9.vO' arKA' MMJArDYMOwEBar VAaOBY M019 vwNlnEOwNN MM NK Or wRI MTnEwu =—%61 , KEITH ZAYAC & a. MmxrMOde«LLOKa r. E DncoE oTewooeaEPA oEerxoBro a lwm oBEa�w�NO E oN MOE. a B eXra o B«NEa EeN B oo+owroR lenNO o¢ ASSOCIATES, RorAM oa.l,or BETaE PEMaDMrNAM waNw iK ArrMnFOwe:. a nx sMo. 1— r x to �m DrE E Mw TK wM ro Nl�e w T wOMFAe Ane ra.NUUm INC. "°o oLAeLErEMO ro M oDMMrlw¢MLL aEAn Ara am,e dL. rX�ramdearlE ertE KteseAE. ro.wTAerz oNweAL (727) 793 -9888 roao T win rxX°�u--NO-1111— CabrEIOTION n uusONaeOA euKNK arArz arE du �MEn or rLaaw. 1. AT— ON leneePTMMT= Kr wn' MNAOE rOIXbnW rAauTE4. mKn ArwaO.ID undnPE x,TEeuL wx[aATELr raudmNOCwerqucrwN [ TOPMlm�i�MF ceSIgNO ,eOev iK ww'uEn roee'WU¢cOr unwaewln , Kn .vosNaalowrxclrwMwrvEaETArlww.w T EM MO lnowd oDMNY NMSUK9 MrtIIPttuneEOMErAe eTAwL2FDe 701 ENTERPRISE ROAD E, In 16 SAFETY HARBOR, EL 3,695 WWW.NRITNZAYAC.COM tzL[ r, "t1 MM AadErW�euoxawuWD. TINT MVOONANAnESUT OrTK wDMPDEaa[m TM rMCTd 41161W M W rote AID TEBTEOOn IN9KCTFO —A TO RWPYY eAeE AXOa+e W.woNe.t ..TKAWel DwEarFDerrKaNEB Mrzlm'MI -- AM OTKB -1 NAA-A-eXAU eE aerOem Ot a ORAOen ALLaeTlwbOAKA9AKTOKA- AAEMLr WLawOMOCN eroOEO r NO —EMtAU eF aEArzn I—et —1' TO SemNE runuM wfx MPWAf AM w1eVeMA AM WnIE eneRTRe NWMRr TO P—T. Am APPw?iAN P- 1OKNPNrO ¢ At I t0 co4rPUCnOn. Mq enEOIAE IwrECrwE AOCOMaroroAOM,c IKrncTld rt Ie M aWTe,CTOw RwrONMUiY roNTT Iii Nair VAlPwlrAiO ManroaF.NOAraan oEwaMNna.M01A" AIEN d ubaOnO1Fxo eRWOecTU'Ewinoli[riainrtEe eW11 eMe WERIEDTOaMU SE Or urwr At— .noon urEAr EOmd AxooMxaw[Ee 6 M vn1eW![GwlwMIMALAOENJEB MNxOReneaCTgx OVw TK aLOaTUnorAUwbnwurzmFesxvMd MrlAne Mee eEEnoErErllEn K NMiewNUndMwust MONKMnoIrOEMmWTTaEl aearM OOMMOfOMMEOdrM4 q! M M4NYnAlMAEIM IK¢PoMS0.m raR ACOAEN.Y PEgro MrtMTOP ANTOONrtNLTKINAOTMry rtMNUYiXE 1111 dNFDI ECwMmrOEKU UrlT- 1INmAIENOdnN,auar ¢ NEEr TnE rnE lnrRVNATE 9EWinENENTe Or mhMwO.wrloenES Q e�' (N7'1 PAOTtl1 exu eUW IaeNMdAt 7X' Pe ENOKw Mllr Aggro MwMM0.MiMCTOn AldraNYR roMOTTM VAbWB —T1 NNEMNNMMSNVMIMKdBITErMEAM' le4P'ATNM 6 ME IwnWAgBdui WtEGYTAM WNEARMED r,rtUiETOOBrwx u l nd NAY nelur wnexwALANDIII— AT M[gpl OWNr MIlr1O. MOaDIrC10ME1MCdIIMCTOn— WIw 0A0MMWlTUmnoeoururr.wKrleleNXWd (�E ND pA�wlrbDn rOK(�NC,xav MtbvrMCiw ewu wiT .T.T. OrATmnMUnmaNrAw. A4uTWTEe wtIdlMErsr� K WOOIlDODNRMC}IMINNLLKKIOdrEperM ,ww' mMfMRMYIMtx ✓MMCIOIEAIOMWtO.nrllMll winM Why 6 [. Na eANOeuPr rn ALL,rrBOTED �TMCiOR6 MNE. erMn IUECfm eOEAUE.i�M pNNIEWTKD AM wNM meWC, NTKT NrvDOeE,WlaIEWA600ATpNTRNSeMM. AN OMV anMWK[xlEn¢ CptETINCTOE.E6ERniMOTM1l'e MVMIXlI UnrtESwNLL ee MCdrtMCTA1Dn0IXTMOOWDbAndWUM :,udEa NIR TESTING AND INSPECTION REGEMENTS © \ J V "A" N MO KPUOlMw�t ALTKCOxiMCTOEe EMlKE� MOVf0.m w'TOYPANEe rt O rail riKMCwniwO wmooa nnO.n AroldnauNe Icrnrrlee wtwEKaeaMrwmarnwcarrtvaranuaunmauwANel. PAVING AND GRADING NOTES r MROr auiwtEr,wNO SrerEN 9X,u eE welECT ra, vNUU iK«c:lw er MO/NEns EXaMenrNld rarKru�NEMna,Oalu cvM w roNTT TxE ExaKw,erNNAe wACVAx:E *O M:KIVt£ rERNN x *« DwMOE ersrENa drat rtN.i E �rerEC,me+ :Xr awfas rewlcr' Q s*aw nerEN =A- yr.� ({N�IQ[.yJ]7 4 hNN It aeruA�oMUewMlnweMertarwrMCioIF IEAraeeomallanu .41 wnwuteaEM OrALL wMArz Aw nwwrRDremv A[rTarFOBrnb tI A v .— .E2mollmio A— IONMYMLro ORKTTwi —MITNO I o"EOU�F 'M!,MO'roaneMLL v.TIOKA oevArzbwaX[[L eFwm,e rEOU�Pt.O Xu+cES ARE watEw rlNCN TOAPPnwn Iznnrrcwrz d WmroR's SAFETY NOTES m � �a K OVlTE.CT9N WON[MAFAe6PmEGVir D PT ®ev rK Pwl�./WTWA,I OORIMErtC9BTIAIrooMnIXM *N.Cfgn AMNOVIT.— PENMTwIb TOIl ALLpwQ aWTM MenESrdMME rON CBruwxOTNE xECEeewrt 011WrzENO NArerq[ TIE UJGIVwT¢NMN.M�NEM OUAOT On ciHw R.—TI A=' OPAVlxFMd10110uxOMPADE n'MwW2. OuIMOMMMiMCfCMMCItMNNEtrnTM4TOxMrnaEOi .Nt YfIT' T ICMAAIRt AACroI[RNnCeD B!NllNTATM1[wNLL EIElIa1M1011IGIMCpxTN (Y IM-111 CrTKTMVENM WNIOMOM �C.1 Q u, E- F 15 4L erW OUIOC -OA TOeEBEEOEOMDMULOEO TorooT nelMOM'imNa.'�"o'ONUT.I ow,rn. Mrb a.r nrro[sabee KAwel xOfmd EM,rllrq Ne lFMtlEMI. [AlonurE^�nEOUwrON ¢MLLDOxpIwroM rnmnalrwlnrne rEDEM[NEaeren ar rKarMTNlNra !�x mix C) OBT Mm ;=-6.—==l=. %moo— �eMO/ tO�m�Nr 'i'NL'iOnrofLtleYNrzwrndA6fe rOKw rRwrowWMNT Ai a �yHWNerMMlpNgirMTxwrxFGMIwT ®ITpvaMlfAnv V� EEO M+L�i Z ' t '� rrbKe erM OMTIIEMA'�'ATO� FtgKw Or KCaN/f.4TPTm ran NUM LNi WIGKwTx erA[w nMUOA NNNwdiMwcooxlea ArOlNtrMlCilil�O11RI—IWONMMAY OwMNpenbL MyRIIMNl Mpyilyry OrMyTIbMYMILMNUaN®MM 2n W WPQ a < GUnaLwM ,r AeuixeM 010DIKMl RRCTMIdMKUN NMgeae WlloDKawrorWTRANOaolNOwxo . n5r OEgIAMIIGDOI eIRAw1MY4 YAwiDMXEEAKRrdwOPALLRMWIC odrnDL mv�lml.twlMnOv�."I-TwKCEeITT rolwmlcrM wMx wrwEt wTlrwMrna:EC, uurra L,,F V l Z NurD D'OM O1"" BxETrs t.r. ' oarM a rn i,Nacuo w.dEwerWOVAVFKMATIw,nwwEla ¢ errKUe p �a U IT 0 TO oecoNMMTwowaBNw o+re KwMVTxBM UEErs i�uBrINOMwKM OEOI"rAlXir' Ma "la�emu ir�wur ,°�awEi¢SrrilKArrw r✓) Yea _ _ conoewvwXa. ?T� ,r T MrE.roNll.0 rd �EmraxD rEaa.T.andA ! .°r[o°ie:on'I"I"" 1T."I� IaIMO�" �a Enao-",Ai'M;Ore o:nl YeA�.e r"..,:" r,° K .IirE¢`uEr'E°IEa'e°.1 °.:QIT.=17 ab°alA'd`d«¢ "el�[rlm.;Dm 'ii'N- l'NavbLV rMTrK w+enw G C U 3 naoleee. winN TNOpIVEaa WLLOWrui'bFlnwA NC�lilar, rWe Cd�.ra crw =writoKITINIT.KO3100M MSTaMEINNFFR. iK NATA511ArwwdaNxnOmAKrawl�iE�wllbr QlE��rRV IO15 rocMw AroeNT MMrz N. w TK anredn M MrNpWIRat WSPVlOMMPEe I,FMMAM TeNnWRf®dFMrz MT161 wTION -1 PW�'t"NO -IPOxo yr . ISRy SRp 'u in `1 PLANS SHALL SUPERCEDE SPEC BOOKS IF A DISCREPANCY OCCURS CHECK PLANS AND CONTACT ENGINEER IN WRITING N� 2 OF 5 VINO 4 GRADING TESTING AND WgMDQN REQUIRIMENTS ModrMCrcR 1. IEeraMeLE ra — NATwAAAu—rzerlwwTxM n —01 sa.-01 roLr TWEra WeenwrnApPxOTOCOn OFAUmwAnol Arn nlerr an�oaaMEN �T .on elndl :=I _ IONIrO '- MYUrMNFYE` M A.A. — V iFK a aCM —DITTO , M� j KVIlweaL Krdr ecpNi rBOIECf O 0 0 .. Ati r EE' + m in `1 PLANS SHALL SUPERCEDE SPEC BOOKS IF A DISCREPANCY OCCURS CHECK PLANS AND CONTACT ENGINEER IN WRITING N� 2 OF 5 CIVIL ENGINEERING LANDSCAPE ARC®TECTURE PLANNING Mcp y ALDS H3q�SONRY KEITH ZAYAC & ASSOCIATES, GRAPHIC SCALE INC. g _ (727) 793 -9888 �M rcr 1 M1 101 ENTERPRLSE EGAD E. STE 46 LOT 69 � sAPETr xAREDE. a 34111 LEGEND - W".KRITNZAYAO.COM TIPICAL �° , .�, PROA'<i SgMDARr aE�R�LatiFlFr�l / � � � + � M+OPOSEO CONCRETE PAVfMFNt � rj �Q�j r ° GENERALSITENOIES C� O 1 ENOINEERMND6CME MCHRECT T01 KEffH bMEAEf. HIRE A H `l 9AiElY HARECR R]ABBS [, Q 1 gpgR t7z71 Tw.ums Fa •,� r`• 2 AND YT MASONRY t LOT !79 zoEVELOOER NAME AIRaE T BIa- 11EACH, mlC.lMICHAEL mESran `,yU ENTS J 1 / 0 FggME 17x7) Ap nxe a ^r� y I (7x7) 411{NBa Fa O LsI I-+ RE 3 ARCHIECT NAME SPENCER ANO A98OCM E9 PRCH ECTUNE. WC o�ANlAsACH. R7R48 Z !yr9d Lv �p A a eE ^CH ^ Sr - t 7 17x7)Mx.T,Y1 FAA fD a 'O �he,`""E p- 0 A6URVEYCR NAME 9UNCOABTLAND6URVEYIND, INC 1` t C-- —EST FioRp�A W (+�j _ 91] BBL1aAx — -U ``� P�(Y[ AcCNR PuS • �a� /[P\` (et]IBBBeBW Pa U Q Z V'S °SZ J C IX•ausl .I \- \1 S. ... TADIXtESB .MtCEL ID A 07(tWtSIS]!R]0000700 Vi 3 •• G "0'09. 90 CLEF TA ER REACH Fl. W7m -I- T (—T7 U 14 ` �I t 1 ✓ 7 DEVELO%0. REE AORANT CrZ.] m 8. LAND DATA TA— r,- �,... a TOTAL BRE MEA W314 SF (01- s e. R114DN4G sEIRACI<s 0 N 3 LOT 720 REOU �TING PROPORED 0 Ir 0 FRONT t.T MIN. (WEST TO BLDD) 0.00 MN. (WEST TO BLDG) Q U 19C�[ AgrNnN] 1 aacP05tC �w y 10910E ib.RP MIN. (NORTHro BLm.J iE11w MPI. INORiHroBLDO.) ` u -F. RT ►2 u • `� f om (SOUTH TO R=) 0.00 (SOUTH TO BLDG ( IaE s sT Mpj- RITZ / MOTET ,0 REAR 41.W MM.(EAlITTO WW) x8.14'MIN (EAST TO SHED)) ORY MggONR�L L R OVERHEAD ALAS ww. (EAerroeNm) TL]A•MP+.(EAaTTO H,m) 1� s LOT 77 X355 Y - \ BUILDING E _ ,YL �M FL.Ns rcc5N11PUCnaN 1 4 STORY MASONRY 10.89E DATA TA— ExIEIRIG. P= cPOSEo KI ^ SKEANE/. W.—, 1,10]14 SF p1/ACT 8,103149E I(038FA) BIIILDINO AREA 1,117.116E (0.]OFM) x,17114 EF 1051 FAR) •••.•••••••• ASPHALTI—RV ETE 44x0.116F (p�6R) I.31BSF (0.10ISM ] °'•°O��'4r • °r9° TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA 1,Y1B.0]6F (Oa11A IIM8x9F (0025AR) EpLi1� _ • -. TOTAL OPEN SPACE 811.11 9F (0014 AC1 1,101.13 BF (0011A[.) ^�• � � ®u 1 \ 1 11. THERE ARENOENVIROMENTALLYU AREASONSRE 1x. ALL -PAVED 018TURSEO MEASWRHWRgHi-0F WAY SH-SE 9000ED t9 x°10 • 9°° AN0.0R RANTED. AR- O-WUSEPERMMWUMREGJIREDFOGIANOBCA ➢MG w° acne r a o°r• w7) vw AND ALL OTHER IMFROVEMENTS WITHIN R4W p :`w•vu ow"•ne m.o �m rya° °°am �° as r °m 11. aOLIO WASTE CCL ECTKKJ CURRENTLY —NICED SY C— CIFMYYATER _ SIDEWALK TYPICAL SECTION u. PEOISrRIANS�osWALressHALLEEINST AU INACCCRDMACEw7rH THECly NTB Z �� w OF CLEARWATMS REQUIREMENTS ANDVAN0M09 ALLIED rc m O 2 Ox HOE—S SHALL NOT EXCEED A CRO88 HDPE OF M f^ a 11 OUTTERS.D(XM9POUT9. UTILRY I—E9 AND OMEN MIBC SITE —ORES Q �` WRL BE PAINTEOSCREENEO, OR OTHERW16E OCACEALED, OR SLENOED IN _ (lllPPjjjtijjjr((('''�'J���TH �Fi VEC' 9UILDIN— CHRECTURE �I •"rv'a°S•r'a, �� _ Q 1B. ALL UNUSED DRIVEWAYS MUST BE REMO—MID REPLACED WRH CURQ SIDEI —. AND LANDSCAPING TO MATCH EARIING COND—Iyt SETTER ^CONCRETE SIDEWALK - ep CONSTRUCTION DETAIL NT9 _ 1s "� 4 OF 5 sa Mcbo N1 1 STORY 'W3IH t)S #347 RY I LOT 69 REN- LU J �I O i CID (/ SO TNC'/.ly•s W LNS+NC Rmo �a SeAcH Nle -s' .w BB. 2 STOOK IIVTS AND FRAAfj LOT 119 RE Res-r( STO, # LOT 120 RITZ MOTEI OVERHEAD BUILDING u �l ^� DETAIL EROSION '•IIIIIIIII�� 1 4 STORY MASONRY PINES "" �}roIIrnELR'H`R � HARDWOODS Xi 1 i �� � • FJ � � ' y TREE BARRICPDCB i ^3 k ® FIFTH AVENUE _ E77 ;� OD 3 OF 5 CIVIL ENGINERRING LANDSCAPE ARCRITLCTURE PLANNING KEITH ZAYAC & GRAPHIC SCALE ASSOCIATES, INC. (M R1) (727) 793 -9888 1-30 N T01 _ERFRISE ROAD E, STE AIA SAFETY HARBOR, FL 3095 WWW.�LKNITMZAYAACC.COM LEGEND C% (WTC/j ��WAii [MISIMG CURB TO REMAIN RRORERTV LINE ® EXISTING PAVEMENT AREA TO BE SAWCUT R REU0lE0 �wNNNNNN.MH TREE BARRICADE IRO+S• ^I SILT FENCE //�N V !i PP++ 3 u �l ^� DETAIL EROSION '•IIIIIIIII�� 1 4 STORY MASONRY PINES "" �}roIIrnELR'H`R � HARDWOODS Xi 1 i �� � • FJ � � ' y TREE BARRICPDCB i ^3 k ® FIFTH AVENUE _ E77 ;� OD 3 OF 5 ' McDo t STORYAfAAL ps 4,347 ONRY i W • LOT 69 AP 2 STORVTMENTS LOT 119 L \ AND F HENRY , 4 W P�,O�E^CN ° t STC ,'71 . LOT 120 9.79 n 3 S�TDC MoT- - ` RITZ MOTE LOT 71 ,y3SSONgy BUILDING ` 4 STORY MASONRY 4 Zj 2 U� ;�j M0 0 C � ; <_ o 4TH AVENUE - -rn �z P6 6z PLANT LIST � � ffQyy f1 m.4, ma mmmeea �+we ulel•u•Ema � � 3 o n + + + + w >° Z a ma + + rn V xU o w L) zw a PLANT SPACING DETAIL (SECTION) nn urt' x U W p xrs E a C� C a } 0 PALM PLANTING DETAIL NTS ••E 5 of 5 44k CML ENGINEERING LAN D —PILA UITECTUU —KNING KEITH ZAYAC & rwa— ASSOCIATES, GRAPHIC SCALE INC. 7 2 7) 7 9 3 - 9 8 8 8 o D E. STL 4, T01 aNTaRP ROAD p s.uen M xnaeoa. PL I.ovs u+ouxxo,cx n�minc oc +u, www.a E,rNZArac.eo• AP 2 STORVTMENTS LOT 119 L \ AND F HENRY , 4 W P�,O�E^CN ° t STC ,'71 . LOT 120 9.79 n 3 S�TDC MoT- - ` RITZ MOTE LOT 71 ,y3SSONgy BUILDING ` 4 STORY MASONRY 4 Zj 2 U� ;�j M0 0 C � ; <_ o 4TH AVENUE - -rn �z P6 6z PLANT LIST � � ffQyy f1 m.4, ma mmmeea �+we ulel•u•Ema � � 3 o n + + + + w >° Z a ma + + rn V xU o w L) zw a PLANT SPACING DETAIL (SECTION) nn urt' x U W p xrs E a C� C a } 0 PALM PLANTING DETAIL NTS ••E 5 of 5 �rruls I � M n SECTION 7 &8 • TOWNSHIP 29 SOUTH • RANGE 15 EAST . ."°'.e. I I ............. PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA e MATCHLINE see SHEET 2 fill i 'N u j," M c ON s 1 SToRy `9LQ 'S p"°." #34jASONRy .S 0— rPw�. 1� "' .m H 1 e�.Ta" d ..,. C_, 1'° ;1 w4 X01 W rug `�J s» i GRAPHIC SCALE ocoo° c.,o.0 cn. � s 1 °nl ♦b�✓ I , I ��� f 1 no ..y,l "'11x. /� �_ o�I ..,n w„ .n. ^ ��•+ �1 � � B.e, ; ..,, \\ % a� 4ti+w�..- �� "� sa�3 �olyl '�ti.. / j _ g§ Bg E ui l 1 ,�,,. 1 .?n �+'.`r`°i�aws "`p'�w�r,., 'r"'•� i 6Ct•�gW,/m'�d (wu .o. )M1 .uenln.a 5 8 E LOT 69 ) •' or ,� � p"� " -F "� ' ��f.w 1 i ..s,� �asr � �-� ( �1� sv _fin � s.i�tv�r�Y� ����l ,,.11 , "prw�,. sis ' O _ � l� � �.�, it { '; °,.n `•^„ �n f �l'j I�.,, .x,�•_` 1i� �'' df I' � ' it I �� u..WL �1 l l 16n. 'q ,;�+ " it i f' II w `"r,se ,! • - J•Mp,� %Sr s.m O "•` e::. � � �-rl aJ ` / i i I, r 1 T, 4✓I y �ys�, y �..o, . , o w. I \ 1 , / I l l rl r'° - "�t'L` E__`�•rx_J _ 7ACYw J' ;s '''��,yI / .- / ,aa < I I rn.> I 1 I f I III /jl ° }3 ,ar s.s ny `__J yeei'= -- ►ti-C...= � 7T M °"JS.m 11 .. _` _", ' 4� ., I l � � � l I i Ill' Yl ' � l f � _S°� -c• � `�_ 't ��'° �'` , i .H 1 + dI I "' 3128 ..+oL�xee }� `" C`G,• 1 "ar / ? APARTNEN •r LOT 119 RY U , �u :B and +. w sro Ts 'i /I ry _ daaC • A+w �'� / ... ` I s:r SAND FRA NRy {I x! I y SO FRENCHV f .,;x., RF �, d _ nn, I � U TH T L L 'E'4 C' I o /l �i I „ �-'�' S=�.a STORVRA0 T- 11 �/ I , I / I I a q g Il 4 #35 ` F ti ,r ^ ; % o '�. '">_ .., PAm RJ6 1 M348 ! gi� IS I,l � O /l� /l •o' I b", '_��•� � :" F 9 � a ua s --v e8,� ±� .,. ad i w a Z 14 l�g� it It, `w.q �, 1".•r .x�,;, 1 I I / vonm«,e LOT 120 ,� ` l I I y / 1 I jl '/ \ » •r __`_ �~`- I � / ..x+ 'a.'1°": , ��� I i� l�l I��� �•�•,,,o �"w' ` `���� od I 1 � °" �."' i- ,!,"a' __.- _ .. All I;1 lll; _ ��, 3 STOR MOTE ", i.i# -_�! ..,, •�',n.) ,... RITZ MOTEL '8 ili Il MASONRY L ti OVERHEAD .i T r , I/ LOT 71 #355 wrL"�r_ BUILDING t li STORY MASONRY V' e3 � I Ih /�;`' // /� !, $�..» �����= _ .c: ,.rar '•'°`771AS--- - --.•» w•.,.r �. �� Zip=. ..nmrw nr ln,wi+��1 s ' r °°'•m,o, d'�ur'"., :. if �l' 'I �''� '�' E" FIFTH i'v°� .m �ima+ero, nmre o"osv. 1 .o.wo� ao sYa�ow' .n „c �•i� 1 � I � � I .-. ,`.iw°�°�wa0�r owiaia�.a n�we K R-uoe �.mnvr '.'"°T%sr I I ` — _ _ •.s+ V ^1'.m. ,i v w rn Ir w�a nr, lac none . z AVENUE �.""" N€ ia�im�o inC®im wn�obe.,meva.�mnnae m a�M� I (Under Construction) „m'°�". ::.,d �'G' »e1..q,'°n +o►an�ru»1�vv.mx w+1..,1 OSnc w I lip -0000 'All CrIll Cvenchy's plan Ebbert Restaurant Operations Manager 7 Rockaway Street Clearwater, Fl. 33767 ����� fse °chys toD °dine -co + Cafe . ,vrs�ec Cafe e� G�1 South R... rh Phone: 727 - 446 -4844 Fax: 727 -461 -7759 Cell: 727- 492 -8005 Corp: 727 -449 -2729 E -Mail: alanrock9944ol.com 4 - 's eF--r �C �D -W . ( Wo— -j "'A01-1 I,, c, �s I� cY . (l ADJACENT PROPERTY ( MCDONALDS c✓Pn i� rw."r' c��/Tr�clo�• FHSo r� ` I 'C "62,; `jb l( J (, rG ' JL' yr: —�- ' lii— Q i sc{/�.11� rC IaY H _ 4- � / `.d , Li 50BULK E>05T. YIKK'Mow, ` (�y �E+OSTING DRNB'MY 9 EXI5TIN6 FRENCHY5 SOUTH BEACH CAFE 2 STORY FRAME EX5TM5 ENTRY R REPLACE EKISTMe "w— E)OSTINS PAVERS AND CONC. MATCH BEAON 50BULK E>05T. YIKK'Mow, MATER _,&-6RAW SC EXISTIIIS STORM DRMI `R EMSTINe fAlm `EJOSTMe ROAD NJ (. 1 MD L IDSOAPIN6 4 NB+ TO MATCH MALK I (M) 1 --------------------------- - —EVSTMS _ _ EMTN6 eAG GRASS LIE - ExISTMS lFK/l r1ALX 13 W04 U-0-i I I; Is i= I� I ADJACENT PROPERTY RITZ MOTEL MM SG@Fl.BtA POIMAM 6RA`la rtYP) 4' NM twtx TO MATCH E#STtt16 I BEACH VIA" •TAN' AND TEXTURE ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN 5P-I I/4'•I'-0' NORTH SITE PLAN BA5M OFF SURVEY DATED 1.15AB BY 9R/GOA5T LAND SURVEYING, INC. �1 i klar and klar T hrb, &M 28473 l 10 rL Clearwater, fl 99781 IL IL v i z m V a a ,.0 Q m co a 2 Q m m m p m 4 • (1 0 �i V � L 0 z V '" m Z 1L Mw1em, ImMM..I YMM.rI. ® ReDMa S. Kler ❑ Sty— L. Klor AA 0002521 ❑ Pr.'I -l—ry ® Perm HNne SN ® Comt"ctlon S,t Dates: OIIZ.=l Drown: TKIW SMM: 5P Of: cant. SLM ADJACENT PROPERTY MCDONALDS »YNDaa I. PRDVU)W ElPAN510N JOINT SEAM 2. MASTIC SEALANT, COLOR TO MATCH AD.L %WALE MTH TO DEPTH RATIO PER W*5 RECAMSDATIM A EXPANSION JOINT V4' SMCUT JT. PROVIDE V4' RAM CRS! CONC. SLAG I. LUr SLAB AS SOON AS M6PE6ATE DOES NOT Diftlum IMBT BE mmm SAME DAY M CGIRCIWM PMCDWJ CONTROL JOINT A 3 SLAB ON GRADE JOINT DETAILS SP-I N.T5. EXI5TIN6 -- ARIVEMAY I EXISTING MAC" InALK EXISTING FRENCHYS SOUTH REACH CAFE 2 5TORY FRAME "'Ir— OIISTIN6 COLIC. 540BMLK —� 0 E%SiM6 O STORM DRARI EKISTN6 CI.RB EXSTIR6 ROAD E705TIN6 60 LIE -- — ICY/ SooOP51 MN SLAB FIBERML'li RE W6. TO MAT CEACH rlAl.K t N-2 o a = ADJACENT PROPERTY RITZ MOTEL 4' NUDE YOLK TO MATCH OWNS BEACH KALK TAN' MID TEXTURE. revision by Q CITY COl48JT5 TK 0121.2011 8 CITY COMNEMS TK 02.n-20N 0 klar and War 4: architects inc. 28478 um, 19 D. oNar"ter, 1l Mail tu tL v U- LL V 6 a 6 W co Z 6 al m lli Q v Z w >L �.«tem m.m.n a ARnn«I. 0 Rob.rta S. Klar ❑ SNv.n L War 6EN9LAL NOTES ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN 1. CAFE 5EATIN6 AREA TO BE MN. 6'5000M FIRM -MUSH � -I V4'r III 'O' � REINFORCED LONG. SITE PLAN BASED OFF SURVEY DATED IJ5OB EY SUNCOAST 2. EXPANSION JOINTS 52' -0.OL. MAX Aw 0002321 I Pnllml ry ❑ na LAND 9URVEYI1,16, INC. 5. CONTROL JOINTS TO BE 1/4' TXC AID APPROX 1/5 THE SLAB DEPTH. SEE L -I FOR LANDSCAPING PLAWDETAILS SPACED W-CA OL. EACH DIRECTION AS SHOW ® P.rmitH.9 S.1 4. THE CONC. SLAB TO HAVE SMOOTH SPONGE FIN1514 VV SMALL 6LA55 M C— truoti.n S.4 BEADS (AASMO TYPE 1 6LA55 BEADS) BROADCAST INTO SERFAGE Dat.: PRIOR TO CLRN6. (COLOR AND FINISH TO MATCH EXISTIN6) 4 01.05Z011 or S. COLORS, TKRRIc 'TAX' PD2-( I5 Y.OAGELLA SAND' OftOMIX LICUD ADMIXTURE FOR COLOR CONDITIONED COLOR CONCRETE. sn..t: Wl%W PIO3Ti26 'A?MGLE CORK' CIROMIX LIOUD ADMIXIUI� FOR COLOR CONDITIONED COLOR CONCIW E. 5P GRDMIX ADMIXTURES BY I.M. SCOFIELD (12,h15 -1849 6. EXPANSION JOINT MATERIAL DYNEIUC, 240 MULTI- COFPONWr PMYURETHME SEALANT BY TREMCO. COLOR TO MATCH DARKEST ADJ. FINISH. (NO—OFFSET) 3 PLANT 510ACIN6 DETAIL L -I KT5. CLEARWATER INDEX No 903. SH. I OF 2 Rev 8/05/05 N -LS_ fROR StER3 PLAINTgd 500. UarsTW5C0 SOIL SHRUB 4 GROUNDCOVER PLANTING DETAIL L-I M.T.S. CLEARWAFER INDEX No 905. OF 1 111— 7/15/99 NT.S- LANDSCAPE PLAN LH V4'r 1' -0' 5EE SP -I FLR MORE INFORTSATION G-F GENERAL LANDSCAPE NOTES L TM Landscape Cont roc for sh,A gratle planang beds. as rr ed, to p,—ide positive drainage and oronote op tinun plant grostn. 2- All recd haetl trees nd plant natergls sill be graded as Nursery Grade No. 1 better as tlhed by the Flory. aDeportnent of AFLVture nd Cons— Services, avlslon or Rant IrMUStry 'Grades and Staneards for Nursery Plants% 7th Edits 1"13 as revised Fron tier to tine. 3 All plontiny it be done it acco,donce sith the Florida Nurserynen's ana Groeer's Assocl0�ions approved oroctices. A. MI Plants shall be FertRlzrd elth Agrlforn 20 -10 -5 tablets as per the — Facturers Spfciiicotions in cohjlhctbn situ note R 5. 5. TM Plant" so. shall b the approsinote proportions os idloss+ wX sand and 50X o,ganic notarial cansisti' of notive peat, sell- decoepoed -*GALS, leaf nold and top sal. It shell prOVde a good plbble and th.'I'vhAy NRs l nedun Mth adaOpete oerotbn. cl,* and ..ter -h Ad`h9 capacity. It snoll also be free OF all eabanMOHS debris. —h as roots, stoneS. .reds, etc. 6. All donting areas .fall race o 3' foyer OG r ycled Yardsppd log month. ehyh is to be satrred -in oiler iistollotionvo, 24d pier bark 3' layer. (•/- 3 1 tog n 7. The plant no teriol scl,e", is presentee For the cony nce OF the Londscape Cant— tor. In the -..t of o discrepancy beteeen the Plan and the Plant key. the don shall --it, 8 Rants shall meet slzr, can toier, and spacing specifications Any no teriol not met" so, Fic,tioms shall be --d and replaced at the contractor's ,.pens'. 9. The Landscape Contractor shall be responsible fors urip all rte wry Q K'able perNts and licenses to perFo,n the Bork set forth in this plan et one the S_Fi odons. 10. The Landscape Contractor shalt g—antee. in siting, plant su— i —blUty Fo, o period OF teetve (l2) months iron Final acceptance by the Omer. II. No cm troc to, idrntifk:ation signs shall be —e tted On the project. a ST,t For the project Infornat" Signs. 12. Esistinq sod shat( be r ved as wry to occonodotr nes Plantings. I3. Any rslst" soda s that are unneceswrXy disturbed ding the landscape Mnstouatlon shall be ,sodded to notch t istvp. 14.. The Landscape Contractor *IU be responsible Fo, the cdlection, r enchal, and proper disposal OF any Find all debris generated during the installotion of this project. FERTILIZATI ❑N NOTES SHRUBS AND TREES At trees and shelbs snail br FrrlXizee Nth 'Agrlforn' 20 -15 -5 plantvp tablets at <kv or installo<ka and Prbr to [onpletion of pi bockfiRig Toblrts shall be doted uo,nly around the root na of a depth that is bets een the piddle and b.tton of the root rosy APPLICATION RATE; I Gallon cery 1 - 21 gran tablet J Gallon cery 2 - 2l gran tablets 5 Gallon con 3 - 2l gran tablets 7 Lennon cent 4 - 21 gran tablets Trrrc 3 - 21 gran taarts inch 1/2' of Palnvr 7 - 21 gran tablets GROUNOCOVER AREAS All WoAndcovrr areas shall receive rertAlzetbn eith "OXnocote' tine release fe,Ulzer as per, —Fact—'s s Witations INR❑RTIEGSATION I. A AUTOMATIC LOW VOLUME IRRIGATION SYSTEM, THAT PROVIDES 1DOX COVERAGE TO ALL PROPOSED PLANTINGS. WILL BE DESIGNED AND INSTALLED BY THE CONTRACTOR. EXISTING RECLAIMED WATER MUST BE USED AS A SOURCE OF IRRIGATION WATER. 2. THE PROPOSED IRRIGATION SYSTEM MUST MEET DR EXCEED ALL APPLICABLE CITY CODE REQUIREMENTS. (rE. BACK F'L13V PREVENTION, AUTOMATIC RAIN SHUTDFF DEVICE. ETC. -) 3. IRRIGATION SYSTEM MUST UTILIZE LOW VOLUME DESIGN SUCH AS LOW TRAJECTORY HEADS OR SOAKER HOSES TD PROVIDE DIRECT APPLICATION AND LOW EVAPORATION 4, IRRIGATION LAYCIUT(S) WHICH OVER -SPRAY AREAS THAT DO NOT REQUIRE IRRIGATION. SUCH AS PAVED AREAS SHALL NOT BE ACCEPTABLE. HIGH DEMAND IRRIGATION AREAS MUST NOT DVER -SPRAY LOW DEMAND AREAS 5, THE IRRIGATION SYSTEM MUST BE OPERATED BY AN IRRIGATION CONTROLLER CAPABLE O DIFFERENTIATING BETWEEN THE SCHEDULES OF HIGH AND LOW WATER DEMAND AREAS- CONTRDLLERSMUST HAVE MULTIPLE CYCLE START CAPACITY AND A FLEXIBLE CALANDER PROGRAM ABLE TD BE SET TO COMPLY WITH LOCAL DR WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT IMPOSED RESTRICTIONS. 6. THE SYSTEM MUST BE EQUIPPED WITH A RAIN SENSOR DEVICE DR SWITCH WHICH WILL OVERRIDE THE IRRIGATION CYCLE OF THE SPRINKLER SYSTEM WHEN ADEOUATE RAINFALL HAS OCCURED. GROUND MOISTURE SENSING DEVICES ARE ENCOURAGED WHERE APPROPRIATE. 7 THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR MUST COORDINATE THE PLACEMENT AND POWER SUPPLY FOR THE IRRIGATION CONTROL TIMER WITH THE CITY AND THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR. 8. THE FOLLOWING IRRIGATION SYSTEM COMPONENTS DR EQUAL WILL BE UTILIZED, PER EACH MANUFACTURERS' SPECIFICATIONS. TORO- NETAFM TECHLINE SELF CLEANING. PRESSURE-COMPENSATING EMITTER LINE HARDIE - RAINDIAL 6 STATION OUTDOOR CONTROL TIMER RICHDALE - 2I4WR 1' ELECTRIC VALVE AMTEC - 10' ROUND VALVE BOX. 3 LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR TD CDGRDINATE W/ CITY OF CLEARWATER FOR MODIFICATION OF CITY'S EXISTING IRRIGATION SYSTEM PLEASE CALL PARKS AND REC. AT 727 462 -6139 PLANT LEGEND /SIZES AND SPACING WHITE FOUNTAIN GRASS # SIZES /SPACING FIRE CROTON 3GAL. = 24' O.C. SPACING, 24' HT. O 7GAL. = 4' -5' HT. GREEN ARBONCOLA STD HIBISCUS 1 0 revlslon by Q CITY LOHHENIS TIC CIE ® CITY LOMWNTS TK 02.1.2011 AL 0 War and War architects Inc. 2x473 CIA. 19 n clearWater,8 33781 LL-I v � z v a Q 6 0 W Q %J Z � — 6 z Q ci � m O O Qkn • n Q V v ' � -a-t 0 z V 10 m Z NLL-I •E— tL ® Roberto S. Klor ❑ Stwen L III — M 0002321 ❑ Prellminary DD PermltNng Set DD C.net —H.r, Set Date: 01 2011 Drp TKIRK Sheaf: L —I OT: a. LEGAL- - DESCRIPTION EGI"ING AT A POINT 190.00 FEET WEST AND 25.00 FEET NORTH OF TH GTHEAST CORNER OF THE SOUTH 1/2 OF THE SOUTHEAST �1 /4 OF THE OUTHEAST 1/4 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 6, TOWNSHIP 29 SOUTH, ANGE 19 EAST, HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY, FLORIDA FOR A POINT OF BEGINNING: ENCE RUN WEST 90.00 FEET ALONG THE NORTH BOUNDARY LINE OF OSBORNE A ENUE; THENCE RUN NORTH 150.00 FEET; THENCE RUN WEST 355.00 FEET; TH CE RUN SOUTH 150.00 FEET TO THE NORTH BOUNDARY LINE OF OSBORNE ME; THENCE WEST 25.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 305.00 FEET; THENCE EAST .0 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 305.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. 0 NOTE CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LATEST EDITIONS OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, ROADWAY AND TRAFFIC DESIGN STANDARDS AND CITY OF CLEARWATER CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS. "INVESTIGATE BEFORE YOU EXCAVATE" 1 i F South Beach, Inc. 419 E. SHORE DRIVE CLEARWATERBEACH, FL 33767 PROJECT, LOCATION FRENCHY'S SOU,TH-BEACH CAFE PARCEL ID #mm 07/29/15/52380/-000/0700 351 S. GULFVIEW BLVD. CLEARWATER, FLORIDA ISSUE DATE: 03.17.09 PREPARED BY: KEITH ZAYAC &ASSOCIATES, INC CIVIL ENGINEERING - LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE - PLANNING 701 ENTERPRISE ROAD E, STE. 404 - SAFETY HARBOR, FL 34695 (727) 793 -9888 W W W.KEITHZAYAC.COM EB'9351 - LC 2600212 FU�� &00 8 - 04009 II►197:1 COVER SHEET 1 GENERAL NOTES 2 DEMOLITION PLAN 3 SITE, GRADING & DRAINAGE PLAN 4 LANDSCAPE PLAN 5 x 0 N. T. S. I wur S S VICINITY MAP GAGSa]V MOM HAIAILTGN LEGN , � GN�LR sNr,A�E UBMW wacuu TAYLdi � `,O� AYE E W V J Ra1Po AUONH Pl1iWJ1 ti WuE LEVY LIMIGN vausA LAItE amus HENNOfDO awnE g 09C£aA `tTy PME 5 PROJECT VICINITY sAniso�A ceSOro wanN GNPLOTIE LEE HENGRY PALM BEAaI cauEa Namoe ueGE PROJECT LOCATION �m% AGENCY APPLICATION /PERMIT # DATE ISSUED / DATE EXPIRES F- CITY OF CLEARWATER FLD2008 -04009 SWFWMD r� CALL SUNSHINE ® 1- 800 - 432 -4770 Is.a FL. STATUTE 553.851 (1979) REQUIRES A MIN. OF 2 DAYS AND MAX. 5 w N DAYS NOTICE BEFORE YOU EXCAVATE. ry, t 11,111 r �m% AGENCY APPLICATION /PERMIT # DATE ISSUED / DATE EXPIRES F- CITY OF CLEARWATER FLD2008 -04009 SWFWMD r� CALL SUNSHINE ® 1- 800 - 432 -4770 Is.a FL. STATUTE 553.851 (1979) REQUIRES A MIN. OF 2 DAYS AND MAX. 5 w N DAYS NOTICE BEFORE YOU EXCAVATE. ry, GENERAL CONSTRUCTION NOTES 1. ALL ELEVATIONS REFER TO THE N.A.V.D. (1988). 2. LOCATIONS, ELEVATIONS, AND DIMENSIONS OF EXISTING UTILITIES, STRUCTURES, AND OTHER FEATURES ARE SHOWN ACCORDING TO THE BEST INFORMATION AVAILABLE AT THE TIME OF PREPARATION OF THESE PLANS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY THE LOCATIONS, ELEVATIONS, AND DIMENSIONS OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES, STRUCTURES AND OTHER FEATURES AFFECTING THIS WORK PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. 3. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CHECK PLANS FOR CONFLICTS AND DISCREPANCIES PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE OWNER'S ENGINEER OF ANY CONFLICT BEFORE PERFORMING ANY WORK IN THE AFFECTED AREA. 4. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL EXERCISE EXTREME CAUTION IN AREAS OF BURIED UTILITIES AND SHALL PROVIDE AT LEAST 48 HOURS NOTICE TO THE VARIOUS UTILITY COMPANIES IN ORDER TO PERMIT MARKING THE LOCATIONS OF EXISTING UNDERGROUND UTILITIES IN ADVANCE OF CONSTRUCTION, BY CALLING FLORIDA SUNSHINE STATE ONE CALL CENTER OF FLORIDA, INC. AT 1- 800 -432 -4770. 5. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR REPAIRING ANY DAMAGE TO EXISTING FACILITIES, ABOVE OR BELOW GROUND, THAT MAY OCCUR AS A RESULT OF THE WORK PERFORMED BY THE CONTRACTOR. 6. ALL UNDERGROUND UTILITIES MUST BE IN PLACE AND TESTED OR INSPECTED PRIOR TO ROADWAY BASE AND SURFACE CONSTRUCTION. 7. IT IS THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO BECOME FAMILIAR WITH THE PERMIT AND INSPECTION REQUIREMENTS OF THE VARIOUS GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN ALL NECESSARY PERMITS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION, AND SCHEDULE INSPECTIONS ACCORDING TO AGENCY INSTRUCTION. 8. ALL SPECIFICATIONS AND DOCUMENTS REFERRED TO SHALL BE OF LATEST REVISIONS AND /OR LATEST EDITION. 9. ALL WORK PERFORMED SHALL COMPLY WITH THE REGULATIONS AND ORDINANCES OF THE VARIOUS GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES HAVING JURISDICTION OVER THE WORK. 10. CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT FOR APPROVAL TO THE OWNER'S ENGINEER SHOP DRAWINGS ON ALL PRECAST AND MANUFACTURED ITEMS. FAILURE TO OBTAIN APPROVAL BEFORE INSTALLATION MAY RESULT IN REMOVAL AND REPLACEMENT AT CONTRACTOR'S EXPENSE. 11. AT LEAST 3 WORKING DAYS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE ENGINEER AND APPROPRIATE AGENCIES AND SUPPLY THEM WITH ALL APPROVED SHOP DRAWINGS, THE CONTRACTOR'S NAME, STARTING DATE, PROJECTED SCHEDULE, AND OTHER INFORMATION AS REQUIRED. ANY WORK PERFORMED PRIOR TO NOTIFYING THE ENGINEER OR WITHOUT AGENCY INSPECTOR PRESENT MAY BE SUBJECT TO REMOVAL AND REPLACEMENT AT THE CONTRACTOR'S EXPENSE. 12. WORK PERFORMED UNDER THIS CONTRACT SHALL INTERFACE SMOOTHLY WITH OTHER WORK BEING PERFORMED ON SITE BY OTHER CONTRACTORS AND UTILITY COMPANIES. IT WILL BE NECESSARY FOR THE CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE AND SCHEDULE HIS ACTIVITIES, WHERE NECESSARY WITH OTHER CONTRACTOR AND UTILITY COMPANIES. 13. ALL DISTURBED AREAS WITHIN PUBLIC RIGHT -OF -WAY ARE TO BE RESTORED TO ORIGINAL CONDITION OR BETTER. 14. REPAIR AND REPLACEMENT OF ALL PRIVATE AND PUBLIC PROPERTY AFFECTED BY THIS WORK SHALL BE RESTORED TO A CONDITION EQUAL TO OR BETTER THAN EXISTING CONDITIONS BEFORE COMMENCING CONSTRUCTION WORK UNLESS SPECIFICALLY EXEMPTED BY THE PLANS. ADDITIONAL COSTS ARE INCIDENTAL TO OTHER CONSTRUCTION AND NO EXTRA COMPENSATION IS TO BE ALLOWED. 15. ALL DISTURBED AREAS WHICH ARE NOT TO BE SODDED ARE TO BE SEEDED AND MULCHED TO FDOT STANDARDS AND MAINTAINED UNTIL A SATISFACTORY STAND OF GRASS ACCEPTABLE TO THE REGULATORY AGENCY AND ENGINEER OF RECORD HAVE BEEN OBTAINED. ANY WASHOUTS, REGRADING, RESEEDING, AND GRASSING WORK, AND OTHER EROSION WORK REQUIRED, WILL BE PERFORMED BY THE CONTRACTOR/SUBCONTRACTOR UNTIL THE SYSTEM IS ACCEPTED FOR MAINTENANCE BY THE REGULATORY AGENCY AND ENGINEER OF RECORD. 16. CHAPTER 77 -153 OF THE FLORIDA STATUTES REQUIRES THAT AN EXCAVATOR NOTIFY ALL GAS UTILITIES A MINIMUM OF TWO WORKING DAYS PRIOR TO EXCAVATING. MAPS SHOW ONLY THE APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF GAS MAINS AND DO NOT SHOW SERVICE LINES. THE ONLY SAFE AND PROPER WAY TO LOCATE EITHER MAINS OR SERVICE LINES IS BY AN ON- SITE INSPECTION BY THE RESPECTIVE GAS PERSONNEL. THEREFORE, EXCAVATORS ARE INSTRUCTED TO TELEPHONE THE RESPECTIVE GAS COMPANY TWO WORKING DAYS BEFORE ENTERING A CONSTRUCTION AREA. 17. RECORD DRAWINGS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR RECORDING INFORMATION ON A SET OF THE APPROVED PLANS CONCURRENTLY WITH CONSTRUCTION PROGRESS. WITHIN TWO (2) WEEKS FOLLOWING FINAL INSPECTION THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT ONE (1) SET OF RECORD DRAWINGS TO THE ENGINEER. THE FINAL RECORD DRAWINGS SHALL COMPLY WITH THE FOLLOWING REQUIREMENTS: 1. DRAWINGS TO BE LEGIBLY MARKED TO RECORD ACTUAL CONSTRUCTION. 2. DRAWINGS SHALL SHOW ACTUAL LOCATION OF ALL WATER AND WASTEWATER PIPING AND RELATED APPURTENANCES, BOTH ABOVE AND BELOW GROUND. ALL CHANGES TO PIPING LOCATION INCLUDING HORIZONTAL & VERTICAL LOCATIONS OF UTILITIES & APPURTENANCES SHALL BE CLEARLY SHOWN AND REFERENCED TO PERMANENT SURFACE IMPROVEMENTS. DRAWINGS SHALL ALSO SHOW ACTUAL INSTALLED PIPE MATERIAL, CLASS, ETC. 3. DRAWINGS SHALL CLEARLY SHOW ALL FIELD CHANGES OF DIMENSION AND DETAIL INCLUDING CHANGES MADE BY FIELD ORDER OR BY CHANGE ORDER. 4. DRAWINGS SHALL CLEARLY SHOW ALL DETAILS NOT ON ORIGINAL CONTRACT DRAWINGS BUT CONSTRUCTED IN THE FIELD. ALL EQUIPMENT AND PIPING RELOCATION SHALL BE CLEARLY SHOWN. 5. LOCATIONS OF ALL MANHOLES, HYDRANTS, VALVES, & VALVE BOXES SHALL BE SHOWN. ALL VALVES SHALL BE REFERENCED FROM AT LEAST TWO (2) AND PREFERABLY THREE (3) PERMANENT POINTS. PAVING & GRADING TESTING AND INSPECTION REQUIREMENTS 1. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR COORDINATING APPLICABLE TESTING WITH THE SOILS ENGINEER. 2. SOILS ENGINEER TO SUPPLY THE ENGINEER WITH A PHOTOCOPY OF ALL COMPACTION TESTS AND ASPHALT RESULTS. THE SOILS ENGINEER IS TO CERTIFY TO THE ENGINEER OF RECORD IN WRITING THAT ALL TESTING REQUIREMENTS REQUIRED BY THE LOCAL REGULATORY AGENCY AND THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (FDOT) FOR THE IMPROVEMENTS AS REQUIRED BY THE CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS HAVE BEEN SATISFIED. 3. CONTRACTOR TO REVIEW SOIL REPORTS AND BORINGS PRIOR TO BIDDING THE PROJECT AND COMMENCING CONSTRUCTION. CLEARING AND SITE PREPARATION NOTES 1. PRIOR TO ANY SITE CLEARING, ALL TREES SHOWN TO REMAIN ON THE CONSTRUCTION PLANS SHALL BE PROTECTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LOCAL REGULATORY AGENCY'S TREE ORDINANCE. IT IS THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO MAINTAIN THESE TREES IN GOOD CONDITION. NO TREES SHOWN TO REMAIN SHALL BE REMOVED WITHOUT WRITTEN APPROVAL FROM THE OWNER. ONLY "GRADING BY HAND" IS PERMITTED WITHIN THE CANOPY LINE OF TREES THAT ARE TO REMAIN. 2. THE CONTRACTOR IS TO PREPARE THE SITE PRIOR TO BEGINNING ACTUAL CONSTRUCTION IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE SOILS TESTING REPORT. COPIES OF THE SOILS REPORT ARE AVAILABLE THROUGH THE OWNER OR THE SOILS TESTING COMPANY. QUESTIONS REGARDING SITE PREPARATION REQUIREMENTS DESCRIBED IN THE SOILS REPORT ARE TO BE DIRECTED TO THE SOILS TESTING COMPANY. 3. CONTRACTOR SHALL CLEAR AND GRUB ONLY THOSE PORTIONS OF THE SITE NECESSARY FOR CONSTRUCTION. DISTURBED AREAS WILL BE SEEDED, MULCHED, OR PLANTED WITH OTHER APPROVED LANDSCAPE MATERIAL IMMEDIATELY FOLLOWING CONSTRUCTION. 4. THE TOP 4" TO 6" OF GROUND REMOVED DURING CLEARING AND GRUBBING SHALL BE STOCKPILED AT A SITE DESIGNATED BY THE OWNER TO BE USED FOR LANDSCAPING PURPOSES, UNLESS OTHERWISE DIRECTED BY THE OWNER. 5. ALL CONSTRUCTION DEBRIS AND OTHER WASTE MATERIAL SHALL BE DISPOSED OF OFF - SITE IN ACCORDANCE WITH APPLICABLE REGULATIONS. 6. CONTRACTOR TO OBTAIN ALL NECESSARY PERMITS AND APPROVALS PRIOR TO REMOVING ANY EXISTING STRUCTURES. 7. IT IS THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO NOTIFY ALL UTILITY COMPANIES TO DISCONNECT OR REMOVE THEIR FACILITIES PRIOR TO REMOVING OR DEMOLISHING ANY EXISTING STRUCTURES FROM THE SITE. 8. THE LOCATION OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES SHOWN ON THE PLANS HAVE BEEN DETERMINED FROM THE BEST INFORMATION AVAILABLE AND ARE GIVEN FOR THE CONVENIENCE OF THE CONTRACTOR /SUBCONTRACTOR. THE ENGINEER ASSUMES NO RESPONSIBILITY FOR ACCURACY PRIOR TO THE START OF ANY CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY. IT SHALL BE THE CONTRACTOR'S /SUBCONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO NOTIFY THE VARIOUS UTILITIES AND TO MAKE THE NECESSARY ARRANGEMENTS FOR ANY RELOCATIONS OF THESE EXERCISE CAUTION UTILITIES. THE CONTRACTOR /SUBCONTRACTOR SHALL WHEN CROSSING ANY UNDERGROUND UTILITY, WHETHER SHOWN ON THE PLANS OR LOCATED BY THE UTILITY COMPANY. ALL UTILITIES WHICH INTERFACE WITH THE PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE RELOCATED BY THE AND THE CONTRACTOR /SUBCONTRACTOR AND SHALL COOPERATE WITH THE UTILITY COMPANIES DURING RELOCATION OPERATIONS. ANY DELAY OR INCONVENIENCE CAUSED TO THE CONTRACTOR /SUBCONTRACTOR BY THE VARIOUS UTILITIES SHALL BE INCIDENTAL TO THE CONTRACT AND NO EXTRA COMPENSATION WILL BE ALLOWED. PAVING AND GRADING NOTES 1. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PROTECTING EXCAVATIONS AGAINST COLLAPSE AND WILL PROVIDE BRACING SHEETING OR SHORING AS NECESSARY. TRENCHES SHALL BE KEPT DRY WHILE PIPE AND APPURTENANCES ARE BEING PLACED. DEWATERING SHALL BE USED AS REQUIRED. 2. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR OBTAINING THE NECESSARY DEWATERING PERMITS FROM THE LOCAL WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT OR OTHER REGULATORY AGENCY. 3. PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATIONS REPRESENT FINISHED PAVEMENT OR GROUND SURFACE GRADE UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED ON DRAWINGS. 4. IT MAYBE NECESSARY TO FIELD ADJUST PAVEMENT ELEVATIONS TO PRESERVE THE ROOT SYSTEMS OF TREES SHOWN TO BE SAVED. CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE WITH OWNER'S ENGINEER PRIOR TO ANY ELEVATION CHANGES. 5. CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE A 1/2" BITUMINOUS EXPANSION JOINT MATERIAL WITH SEALER AT ABUTMENT OF CONCRETE AND ANY STRUCTURE. 6. ALL PAVEMENT MARKINGS SHALL CONFORM TO FDOT STANDARD INDEX NO. 17346, SHEETS 1 -7. 7. CONTRACTOR SHALL TRIM, TACK, AND MATCH EXISTING PAVEMENT AT LOCATIONS WHERE NEW PAVEMENT MEETS EXISTING PAVEMENT. 8. CONTRACTOR IS TO PROVIDE EROSION CONTROL/SEDIMENTATION BARRIER (HAY BALES OR SILTATION CURTAIN) TO PREVENT SILTATION OF ADJACENT PROPERTY, STREETS, AND STORM SEWERS. IN ADDITION, CONTRACTOR SHALL PLACE STRAW, MULCH, OR OTHER SUITABLE MATERIAL ON GROUND IN AREAS WHERE CONSTRUCTION RELATED TRAFFIC IS TO ENTER AND EXIT THE SITE. IF, IN THE OPINION OF THE ENGINEER AND /OR LOCAL AUTHORITIES, EXCESSIVE QUANTITIES OF EARTH ARE TRANSPORTED OFF -SITE EITHER BY NATURAL DRAINAGE OR BY VEHICULAR TRAFFIC, THE CONTRACTOR IS TO REMOVE SAID EARTH TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE ENGINEER AND /OR AUTHORITIES. 9. IF WIND EROSION BECOMES SIGNIFICANT DURING CONSTRUCTION, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL STABILIZE THE AFFECTED AREA USING SPRINKLING, IRRIGATION, OR OTHER ACCEPTABLE METHODS. 10. THERE IS TO BE NO DISCHARGE (I.E. PUMPING, SHEET FLOW, SWALE, DITCH, ETC.) INTO EXISTING DITCHES OR CANALS WITHOUT THE USE OF SETTLING PONDS. IF THE CONTRACTOR DESIRES TO DISCHARGE INTO THE EXISTING DITCHES OR CANALS A SETTLING POND PLAN PREPARED BY THE CONTRACTOR MUST BE SUBMITTED TO AND APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER OF RECORD AND LOCAL REGULATORY AGENCY PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. EROSION CONTROL GENERAL NOTES 1. ALL EROSION /SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES SHALL COMPLY WITH STATE AND LOCAL SOIL EROSION CONTROL AND CONSERVATION STANDARDS. ADDITIONAL MEASURES TO PREVENT / CONTROL SOIL SEDIMENTATION OR EROSION MAY BE REQUIRED DUE TO SITE CONSIDERATIONS WITHIN THE BOUNDARY LIMITS AND DOWNSTREAM. 2. PRIOR TO DEVELOPMENT, PERIMETER SHALL BE CLEARLY MARKED AND ALL SOIL DISTURBANCE TO BE CONTAINED WITHIN. OFF SITE WORK MAY BE NECESSARY DUE TO ACTUAL SITE SLOPE OR DRAINAGE REQUIREMENTS ALL CONTROL MEASURES MUST CONFORM TO SITE STANDARDS. 3. ALL STORM DRAIN AND SANITARY SEWER TRENCHES NOT IN PAVED AREAS ARE TO BE MULCHED AND /OR SEEDED WITHIN 14 DAYS AFTER INITIAL BACKFILL. 4. DURING CONSTRUCTION, ALL SEDIMENT CONTROL STRUCTURES WILL BE INSPECTED AFTER EACH RAINFALL AND REPAIRED IF NECESSARY. SEDIMENT TO BE REMOVED TO A SUITABLE DISPOSAL AREA AND STABILIZED WITH PERMANENT VEGETATIVE COVER. 5. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR MAINTAINING ALL SEDIMENT AND EROSION CONTROL MEASURES UNTIL DISTURBED AREAS ARE STABILIZED. 6. AFTER FINE GRADING, ALL DISTURBED AREAS ARE TO BE PERMANENTLY MULCHED AND /OR SODDED. 7. NO SLOPE SHALL BE GREATER THAN 3:1. 8. FOLLOWING INITIAL SOIL DISTURBANCE, PERMANENT OR TEMPORARY STABILIZATION SHALL BE COMPLETED WITHIN SEVEN CALENDAR DAYS AS TO THE SURFACE OF ALL PERIMETER CONTROLS, DIKES, SWALES, DITCHES, PERIMETER SLOPES, AND ALL SLOPES GREATER THAN 3 HORIZONTAL TO 1 VERTICAL (3:1); AND FOURTEEN DAYS AS TO ALL OTHER DISTURBED OR GRADED AREAS ON THE PROJECT SITE. THIS DOES NOT APPLY TO THOSE AREAS WHICH ARE SHOWN ON THE PLAN AND ARE CURRENTLY BEING USED FOR MATERIAL STORAGE OR FOR THOSE AREAS ON WHICH ACTUAL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES ARE CURRENTLY BEING PERFORMED. MAINTENANCE SHALL BE PERFORMED AS NECESSARY TO ENSURE THAT STABILIZED AREAS CONTINUOUSLY 9. MEET THE THE APPROPRIATE REQUIREMENTS OF GOVERNING AUTHORITIES. TESTING AND INSPECTION REQUIREMENTS 1. THE STORM DRAINAGE PIPING SYSTEM SHALL BE SUBJECT TO A VISUAL INSPECTION BY THE OWNER'S ENGINEER PRIOR TO THE PLACEMENT OF BACKFILL. CONTRACTOR TO NOTIFY THE ENGINEER 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE TO SCHEDULE INSPECTION. 2. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN THE STORM DRAINAGE SYSTEMS UNTIL FINAL ACCEPTANCE OF THE PROJECT. THE STORM SYSTEM WILL BE INSPECTED BY THE OWNER'S ENGINEER PRIOR TO APPROVAL FOR CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY PURPOSES. SAFETY NOTES 1. DURING THE CONSTRUCTION AND /OR MAINTENANCE OF THIS PROJECT, ALL SAFETY REGULATIONS ARE TO BE ENFORCED. THE CONTRACTOR OR HIS REPRESENTATIVE SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE CONTROL AND SAFETY OF THE TRAVELING PUBLIC AND THE SAFETY OF HIS PERSONNEL. LABOR SAFETY REGULATIONS SHALL CONFORM TO THE PROVISIONS SET FORTH BY OSHA IN THE FEDERAL REGISTER OF THE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION. 2. THE MINIMUM STANDARDS AS SET FORTH IN THE CURRENT EDITION OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA, MANUAL ON TRAFFIC CONTROL AND SAFE PRACTICES FOR STREET AND HIGHWAY CONSTRUCTION, MAINTENANCE AND UTILITY OPERATIONS SHALL BE FOLLOWED IN THE DESIGN APPLICATION, INSTALLATION, MAINTENANCE, AND REMOVAL OF ALL TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES, WARNING DEVICES, AND BARRIERS NECESSARY TO PROTECT THE PUBLIC AND WORKMEN FROM HAZARDS WITHIN THE PROJECT LIMITS. 3. ALL TRAFFIC CONTROL MARKINGS AND DEVICES SHALL CONFORM TO THE PROVISIONS SET FORTH IN THE MANUAL ON UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES PREPARED BY THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION. 4. IT SHALL BE THE SOLE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO COMPLY AND ENFORCE ALL APPLICABLE SAFETY REGULATIONS. THE ABOVE INFORMATION HAS BEEN PROVIDED FOR THE CONTRACTOR'S INFORMATION ONLY AND DOES NOT IMPLY THAT THE OWNER OR ENGINEER WILL INSPECT AND /OR ENFORCE SAFETY REGULATIONS. PLANS SHALL SUPERCEDE SPEC BOOKS IF A DISCREPANCY OCCURS CHECK PLANS AND CONTACT ENGINEER IN WRITING CIVIL ENGINEERING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE PLANNING KEITH ZAYAC & ASSOCIATES, INC. (727) 793 -9888 701 ENTERPRISE ROAD E, STE 404 SAFETY HARBOR, FL 34695 WWW.KEITHZAYAC.COM EB 9351 - LC 2600212 PROJECT #: 710 -08 Q cy') 03.17.09 p W Z�- DRAWN BY: W U1 W Cr) v W W W F- 4 W � �D �y v w 2 W owoo z o Lid � r� U cyD W z U T�Tl� U g Z w a w a I- w (nn Z W w� �1.4 U m z O H a U U) w 0 n r O z CL1W >- to -0 zw I oi • t �� Ole N o ca �.' cr _ ti t*, I • `l/ a� � ��' �- w w zz Lu ' •� 4�4; V1 p ' zwr °� • •� t ,��L9 Q w o or z PROJECT #: 710 -08 Q cy') 03.17.09 CHECKED BY: KZ DRAWN BY: RM W v W W W F- 4 W � �D �y v w 2 OF 5 z o Lid � r� U cyD W z U T�Tl� U g Z w a w a I- w (nn m z O H a U U) w 0 n r O z CL1W >- to -0 zw I oi • t �� Ole N o ca �.' cr _ ti t*, I • `l/ a� � ��' �- w w zz Lu ' •� 4�4; V1 p ' zwr °� • •� t ,��L9 Q w o or z 0 l C PROJECT #: 710 -08 ORIGINAL DATE: 03.17.09 CHECKED BY: KZ DRAWN BY: RM �t SHEET NO. fti t 2 OF 5 0 l C 4 Curb 4.26 I a_ / m 4.46 58 / I v / 3.71 / 3.74 3.68 14" 3.89 2 41 AACOONj .9 q 5. .13 N 3.90 4 5 5.01 0 23 GREASE r S 1 OR `' 4 37 r y� TRAPS �n ° ' 4.78 5.53 N #347 MAS ONRY co 4.69 2 Valle y Curb v � 1 5.54 �G c F 5.82 4.69 � v 5.48 9 ° s 4.56 4.67 4.67 �v ,�� POINT OF CURVE (not found) 558 I I 4 5 5.53 f 5.99 -. ° 4.30 4 9 V CL Asphalt a 4.3 co "' Tem I tJ 5.66 in- 4.80 N Set q ary BM _ Inlet #1 5.96\ Z4� I o 4.57 4.50 h BQCk of `Cut Rirn 5 41 coi / ten ti �. 5.09 �o I Z M Elev= 5.Spurb InvrOat 4.53 Re Co nc• Bloc 5.45 5 89� / ° � 7 4.19 3. 0 4.60 /2 PVC NE tO1nIn9 Wollk 5.26 4 Choir( 5 IrD�� 89 5.23 I 2.60 L�nk� .03 3.54 379 4 ence / 4.59 4.36 0,3 5.42 t Q) 4.56 / 15. 1 4.93 LOT 69 5.38 1.3= , ` Ji I 5.89 I I 37 3.99 C) -µ 5.08 5.35 5.35.33 11.34 1 x.46 I c u �� / c �� / / 5.43 Chain Link Feryce 4.51 � o I a Concrete L o / 4.21 I _LL � EXISTING GATE 5 5.32 - rJ o v I 13' co T x4 d C% - /2.. TO REMAIN 5. 15.74 5.33 �° I / / o c I a op Brake -- Asphalt 4" Oak 5 2 `�� v a I COncrete I Inv 5.21 5.41/ / rJ n IS.. RCP 3.48 a / 0 \ 0 2.6g 5.64 I 3.53 �,{L I/ x Cut X 3.6 3�_ / 6 S & TO Inv 12" pVC 2 53 5.49 5 5.64' C o n5.8� e` 514.1 � 5.00 5.03 5.07 I 6 4. 6 6 "� 5.2-6-- 12" PVC Storm + 4 _ n 4.94 4.6 I / ` I 14152 //4.93' 4.9 83 67 ` 1� Toll CB Zf2 �q. 5.63 8 n 5.06 I, v+.54 W44 - s J a7QF 1 6' W r 2.53 o O' Block 5.02 03 \4.48 EX;S °pd FenC R Refoinin o!/ .5; I nti I / � EXISTING SIDEWALK �° I� \ ` _ � / 4.92 Tl NG 8� HEDCE � ``+ 5.66 0 6 2' ��F'. Curb e , Oak .6te on Pond W / IU �\ N C P / °ryt r � 7Q �Qi 4 24 I °nCrete`,n 5.02 W =' _t_ , 7�nc• Flume VIII a, FF 7.09 I w U a �'� 3 90 ooenc/�"� ��. 1 4.35 4.47 t` ELEV I c� � �,� 5.4 J 4.8 o �4 40W4. a 3.V4 4 Tur ; ,= Wood \ 4.67 0 U° 97 4.23 c f Block 4.89 Fe II / w ° �' 13.0 -)cep' AP 3.92 � " 4.10 3.66 8 Gos Flush rr 3' �D M LOT 119 iZ7 21 /� 3.7 1 I TO R T EN S I / 3.8 .2 , 1.4' 20 0 Cam& 69 for (b lteds�oel plQtes v Choi ��ink Feriae 4.6 4 ound C M S RY QA/� 4 98 o 3.34 A I N o / o Rose veredl wn� I 3.74 3 7 0 0 N d Concrete 4.38 yG / / a O -1 . � a BFP (2) N I MOP 20.91 r 9 1 @05 ' 3 �l I 3.11 U 3.72` FF ELEV =6�n 4.8 m / ®� / / / - / / / 3 ``�. 7 4.93 W 45 m 4. 5 34' 1 5. ' / Oo LLJEXISTING %ODiIEG1• �a F�RSTF�O'IH VY C FRF' AE y C MS / 0 #35 y .16 0 / 4. 7 c N 4.03 I I U C 6 / /6 9' FF' ELE��6 / O 4.59 3.7 I I r 1 a l N7g o I F $ I / N 3.4' 6 4.88 / a, / 52 113 35 >bp B _� 0 22. �' 23• �o' o / 6.9 . '5 V rok n � N v / �• I I 4.0 O 44.366 WOpd Deck r� °' Co 75 / 6.30 1 AIVD FR,QnnOU Y Wood I .8 I D Number "'SIC Sheds 4.85 F.F ELEV. 0] / 0 � 56 CID 4.9 ur / 45.95' 8 4 `ncrO 75 5' Wood Fe =chin9 °n Crete I 1g. / rice 74 / I l 50 / MosOnry Wall 4.70 4 COn ete �1/3 / EXISTING SHED TO BE 4.72 .75 lock Woll REMOVED 3.64 / EXISTING RAMP 4.76 95' / Concr' , TO BE REMOVED F F EL E ._5.42 ° 4.71 / / 5.48 F 3 S SILT FENCE 72 o / I F ELEV _54 TORY Wood Fenc / % 8 MAS T e l I v 52 / LOT 71 #355 CRY Sit gOk-C BM / Corner x_Cut on 3 I CONTRACTOR TO REMOVE E3�IY4TINl�ggCOncrete p / ° o FF TURF BLOCK & PAVEMENT (1 PARKI�G STALLpd a ° 47 ELE�1S I ' I is i I • • =I -I- 4.80 /C pad -� 5. o Wood 5 Stairs 26. 9= 4 N 4.1 40406 STORI Roised 4 4 4.1,5 Concrete Woad 4.94 #3< e eck / 4.95 4 o7oncrete F.F. C N 4.9 On cre to ELEV. °6.06 41 � co . ° Transformer ..�r o 4.69 on Concrete 1 c M 70 1.5'x1.5' / E� / 4,37 Column d Shed . x4.68 4 4030 4.57 ILLEGIBLE 5 /8.�FirP Dept. Connection d- Shed 1 1 v' l C� B 95.11 4 N I / u uild;n9 Overhon9 Concrete F _ _ I / _ c�, F. _ ELEV i 5 3g 3.43 / 3 41/ a _ -d� 9 Omer I n 3.97 h On 39 4.39 -I- 4.47 _ 4.79 / Q o/ 4.57 4.45 4.51 39, g' 4.-5� x 3' A/C Pod Asphalt Pavement LOT 120 1.5'x1.5' Column Building Overhang MOTEL OVERHEAD BUILDING 4 STORY MASONRY Asphalt Parking + 4.15 Elevator F.F F.F. Under Building . ELEV. ELEV. =5.01 =4.73 - 1.2 x1.2' 6 1.5'x1.5' * 4'56 1.4'x1.4' Column Column \ \ ' Column 'lam 4 Building Overhang - - \� CID 1 21 Asphalt Pool Area & \ Concrete Deck 4.46 3.1 I Storm MH #1 Rim 3.10 + 3.97 -- Bottom -1.45 Full of water / -- FIFTH A VE N U E 4• 9 5' Metal Railing / H 414 (Under Construction) 56 (Paved over) f 4.76 Asphalt 1 4.51 Z 17 GRAPHIC SCALE 10 0 5 10 20 ( IN FEET 1 inch = 10 ft. LEGEND EXISTING CURB TO REMAIN - - - PROPERTY LINE EXISTING PAVEMENT AREA TO BE SAWCUT & REMOVED TREE BARRICADE SILT FENCE SPACING OF POSTS _ FILTER FABRIC TO BE 6 -10 FEET APART MATERIAL CIVIL ENGINEERING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE PLANNING KEITH ZAYAC & ASSOCIATES, INC. (727) 793 -9888 701 ENTERPRISE ROAD E, STE 404 SAFETY HARBOR, FL 34695 WWW.KEITHZAYAC.COM EB 9351 - LC 2600212 FOR ADDITIONAL STRENGTH Q co FILTER FABRIC MATERIAL CAN W BE ATTACHED TO A 6 -INCH (MAX) MESH WIRE BACKFILLED TRENCH BEEN ASTENEDETO THE POSTS z U � > 'rrte O FILTER FABRIC z MATERIAL SECURELY E4 FASTENED TO THE ATTACHING TWO SILT FENCES POSTS OR IF USED O THE WIRE MESH I-�-i lJ APPROXIMATELY 8 F� INCHES OF FILTER ID PLACE THE END W FABRIC MATERIAL POST OF THE O Q MUST EXTEND INTO SECOND FENCE �y A TRENCH AND BE INSIDE THE END ANCHORED WITH COMPACTED POST OF THE O L BACKFILL MATERIAL FIRST FENCE CO LLt Q WOOD OR ROTATE BOTH Z O 2 STEEL POST POSTS AT LEAST U F- V Z 180 DEGREES IN LU RUNOFF - A CLOCKWISE O O W DIRECTION TO CREATE A TIGHT a a � SEAL WITH THE FABRIC MATERIAL 10(IINNC ES DIRECTION OF RUNOFF WATERS /� /� //� APPROXIMATE + + + DRIVE BOTH 4 -INCH BY POSTS ABOUT 10 / 4 -INCH TRENCH - INCHES INTO THE GROUND AND BURY FLAP EROSION CONTROL /SILT FENCE DETAIL N.T S HARDWOODS DRIP LINE SPECIFICATIONS - WOOD BARRIER 1. MINIMUM RADIUS TO BE PROTECTED: A. HARDWOODS - 2/3 DRIPUNE B. CONIFERS & SABAL PALMS - ENTIRE DRIPUIN 2. UPRIGHTS - NO LESS THAN 2' X 2' LUMBER. 3. HORIZONTALS - NO LESS THAN 1' X 4' LUMBEF 4. BARRIERS SHALL BE ERECTED AROUND ALL PROTECTED TREES AND PALMS, AND INSPECTED BY CITY REPRESENTATIVE BEFORE CONSTRUCTION BEGIN! 5. UPRIGHT POSTS ARE TO BE AT LEAST 4 FEET IN WITH A MINIMUM OF 1 FOOT ANCHORED IN GROUND FEET ABOVE GROUND. 6. BARRIERS TO REMAIN IN PLACE UNTIL ALL PAVINC CONSTRUCTION AND HEAVY EOUIPMENT IS OUT OF A FURTHER INFORMATION MAY BE OBTAINED FROM THE RESOURCE SPECIALIST AT 562 -4741. UPRIGHT TREE BARRICADES N.T.S. PINES r rw~ •� IT •• u 0 O w W Nw Q �I W I�i a W Q O 0 Q ~ G"I w W H Z FOR ADDITIONAL STRENGTH Q co FILTER FABRIC MATERIAL CAN W BE ATTACHED TO A 6 -INCH (MAX) MESH WIRE BACKFILLED TRENCH BEEN ASTENEDETO THE POSTS z U � > 'rrte O FILTER FABRIC z MATERIAL SECURELY E4 FASTENED TO THE ATTACHING TWO SILT FENCES POSTS OR IF USED O THE WIRE MESH I-�-i lJ APPROXIMATELY 8 F� INCHES OF FILTER ID PLACE THE END W FABRIC MATERIAL POST OF THE O Q MUST EXTEND INTO SECOND FENCE �y A TRENCH AND BE INSIDE THE END ANCHORED WITH COMPACTED POST OF THE O L BACKFILL MATERIAL FIRST FENCE CO LLt Q WOOD OR ROTATE BOTH Z O 2 STEEL POST POSTS AT LEAST U F- V Z 180 DEGREES IN LU RUNOFF - A CLOCKWISE O O W DIRECTION TO CREATE A TIGHT a a � SEAL WITH THE FABRIC MATERIAL 10(IINNC ES DIRECTION OF RUNOFF WATERS /� /� //� APPROXIMATE + + + DRIVE BOTH 4 -INCH BY POSTS ABOUT 10 / 4 -INCH TRENCH - INCHES INTO THE GROUND AND BURY FLAP EROSION CONTROL /SILT FENCE DETAIL N.T S HARDWOODS DRIP LINE SPECIFICATIONS - WOOD BARRIER 1. MINIMUM RADIUS TO BE PROTECTED: A. HARDWOODS - 2/3 DRIPUNE B. CONIFERS & SABAL PALMS - ENTIRE DRIPUIN 2. UPRIGHTS - NO LESS THAN 2' X 2' LUMBER. 3. HORIZONTALS - NO LESS THAN 1' X 4' LUMBEF 4. BARRIERS SHALL BE ERECTED AROUND ALL PROTECTED TREES AND PALMS, AND INSPECTED BY CITY REPRESENTATIVE BEFORE CONSTRUCTION BEGIN! 5. UPRIGHT POSTS ARE TO BE AT LEAST 4 FEET IN WITH A MINIMUM OF 1 FOOT ANCHORED IN GROUND FEET ABOVE GROUND. 6. BARRIERS TO REMAIN IN PLACE UNTIL ALL PAVINC CONSTRUCTION AND HEAVY EOUIPMENT IS OUT OF A FURTHER INFORMATION MAY BE OBTAINED FROM THE RESOURCE SPECIALIST AT 562 -4741. UPRIGHT TREE BARRICADES N.T.S. PINES r rw~ •� IT •• u W Q Z W - - W I W 0 z W ���LttE�CIt70iF �h', � W • • I I ! , .. •.• 0 t O CIO �`. ,• as,••,L�•. W > r\ Cj�' •�' W w • \ .F � Z Z ,�1 � U) W w °w ¢ z w � • Jar N LLI 44, II- Q z m PROJECT #: 710 -08 ORGINAL DATE: 03.17.09 CHECKED BY: KZ DRAWN BY: RM SHEET NO. 3 OF 5 M• 74 ter. o i . ,.., -.. - 4.67 N POINT OF CURVE (not found) 4. P 5 h 5 5.53 5.99 _ u 4. 3 4. 9 c0 Tem Asphalt a 5.66 I 0 4.80 4.57 4.50 car cn BQ�keox rCuBM - Rirn is . 5.96 1 t9 en t. o M E /ev. _S of Invroot 4153 Re Cone Bloa 5.45 5 89\ / L� �I 5.8 4.19 3. 0 12 PVC tO /n'n9 Wollk 4 Ch °irf r 5.23 4.60 NE 2 60 Link 5.03 J 3.54 3 79 y4 ence x.59 4/8,35/ 4.36 / 4.56 � . 1 4.93 LOT G 5.38 5.42 38 � 69 � � 509 37 3.99 c�/ -{� 5.08 5.35 5.3 � 3 / --I--- 5.13 x.46 �l iv �� I 5.U3 1 3 / / 5.43 11.3 4 Chain Link Fenc 4.51 U o L. I a Concrete I j 9 e rj 4.21 3 - y F 5. (1 5.74 5.32 0 Q ° �/ ° Q / `° 4"°X4 d C M_ 12,. 5. 1 5.33 // o F a TOP Bro n 9 \ AsphOlt 4» °Ok Inv 15„ ` 5.27 5 2 4� C) °a Concrete GRAPHIC SCALE RCp 10 0 5 10 20 3.53 3.48 / a / 0 5 3.6 9 \ 6 + 1 S In v 12" P 2.69 5.49 5 6 5.81 5 4r(� J 5.00 5.03 ICut X _ 14. &To VC 253 on L. 11. �I X �4. 6 .2 ' � 5.6 6 6" CCC S,- 12" PVC Storm n 4 �4 4.6 e .07 ° - _ _ + 5.06 (1N FEET ) I67 B 37 5.63 145 I 7 1 inch = 10 ft~ .54 4 48 / pjq 1 6 Wood F 2.53 R toe• Black .84 5.02 3 \ E n 8 �f 4.23 a a U C° 4.03-- ,p�Mb ±1 3.64 4.92 XISTINB g' HEDGE -I- 5.66 2 ,.F„ C enCe 7" Oak Re tent;on p "19 Wall + 63�,k Urb 6 2.67 I 5�0 c ° I 6 pp P 4 I J I v , � Co Q , I iL O ° 3.4 3.88 Concrete-L6 _ 7 .Inc. F uI 6, lurne c I a� F.F• N c°� -1- 0 Woo =Fery e 1 4.35 4.47 ►` I U _ELEV, v �c� rJ 5.4 ` 4.8 ° _440W.9 4 3 T /I/ ° 7 a 3.Y F a urf o k 4.89 1 93 U✓ood n 4.67 U 3.92 I � � `n J v - 73' 0 � J r � � __ L1 °e�J co A�� 4.10 3.66 I 3.7 �� 8 / Dos Regulator T� B3 3' Oh 2 RTMENT LOT 119 I Qj O 3.34 3.8 _ 20, 0 9ulator - St of Link Faun T pR y S / 1.4' (gal Plat Fenc 4. d / U N / 5.15vtiee_ Ted da es 22.0' e 4 "X4„ C M. ,Q MAS 4.98 3.74 3 7 3 o / ro R Oise dvCo Bret 4. 80 �� wn) l No 1, p. Number" 'ND FRQ �7o�Ry IO f a _ N 2 RF BLO od Sh 2 ' lME -I- 4.80 1 • `' ; _0 BFp (2 a l Po 0.9' 1 .05 +BYr.ERIC N PAVERS eds 577 FF, O °� / p Drain OR EQUAL d. ELEV, 3 9.72 I`D EXISTING ME�hFA 4.8- m =S / _ / t�A WHEEL STOP (TYP.) 77 GENERAL SITE NOTES: 0 3• 7 EQUIPMENT & S E 4. A/e P 1. ENGINEER /LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT: KEITH ZAYAC & ASSOCIATES, INC. 4.93 � / F TO REMAIN 5 34' �+ 9- ad W 701 ENTERPRISE ROAD EAST, SUITE 404 I ` 1 l .4 1 4 5.0 St °d SAFETY HARBOR, FL 34695 I I I = ►` l O(f TH S 45, 4• 5 airs 2 (727) 793 -9888 Bus _� /3. o / a / 2 sro BFACL 11 35i 93 6.s'�6 ST4R I I V U - o / c / 351 FRAME (sx/SH ; l ^ _ 0 4 4 N 4.1.0 6 (727) 793 -9855 Fax I / ° = / > a ^' / 1.56,sF N / 47jb1 5. 5.10 // once�t Wood 4.1 94 #3 2. DEVELOPER NAME: FRENCHY'S SOUTH BEACH, INC. / MICHAEL PRESTON �0�3 SF - / o N 5, t` e eCkk--- 419 EASTSHORE DR. � / DECK EXP NSIO ° / / FF• ELEV; l �° P, l�1 5.24 /�'sf8� 4 eo�°ncrete CLEARWATER, FL. 33767 1 ° - �,/ 4.59 5.7 O (SEE + / / 6 2g I 5.95 �'4. 9 F. F• (727) 449 -2729 Bus Concrete (727) 446 -0588 Fax -� io `-- rG / in / COncr ELEV. N76 052 / DETAIL) + 4. N 3, 4 • 4.88 / ° _ Wood 8 ' 6.06 I ' 3 35 p B ` �` 7 / r l 22, �, / 0 24' rn a .92 Shed 8 �` co 3. A CHITECT NAME: SPENCER AND ASSOCIATES ARCHITECTURE, INC. 69 • `SO V rok n / v r' 11 " 4 4.66 P.O. BOX 306 ^ I / 4.0 0 0 4 � ° °k ^ cS o 7X22' co r 18. Gas 4.C�1 6 39. g' INDIAN ROCKS BEACH, FLORIDA 33785 4 05 / 6.30 co PR0 02 8 Bt�ILDING 71 TRIPE W ACTOR ICK _ 4.62 .67 Heater y -�L 44- SIF (727) 449 -2724 Bus I I + 3• \ 6 � 4.90 E= 6.28 4.0WHITE TRAFFIC PAI 45.95.6 ` , <c, • 4 egu /° q/C 3 `1 (727) 442 -7192 Fax 4 � - . 6 4 6.2a I . 4.6 0 for Pad I CO w ' ' iv 6" Tree 4. SURVEYOR NAME: SUNCOAST LAND SURVEYING, INC. 35 I /3 65 verhOng w 6.28 �' 4.69 :` 5 4.4 < 111 FOREST LAKES BOULEVARD ` OLDSMAR, FLORIDA 34677 (P) / I /gutter encroo 75 �1 4.46 Asphalt (813) 854 -1342 Phone 5 Wood chin9 Cone I � 4.90 � . < c • < n < ( Pavement 813 855 -6890 Fax I F to `� / � / ` CONCRETE II 5AE� pen 4' C° t N t : < `T , c i ' ° Qom" PAVEMENT LOT 120 ( ) 3 50 my Wall .70 Cori ere B/ IIlI 11 , , <., Transformer 4.7 5 °ck Wall Ill ` , 4 6 5. PROJECT ADDRESS: PARCEL ID # 07/29/15/52380/000 /0700 I N _ 9 on Concrete I N PROPOSED NEW 4'76 `4`� , 4046 1.5'x1.5' CLEARWATER EBEACH, DFL 33767 Column 1.5'x1.5' DECK (SEE ARCH. PLANS 5.1 Concrete < ' < , ' A - 4 37 Building overhang I I �3 FOR CONSTRUCTION FF ELEV 1 + 4 W3 d - - - Column g g 6. ZONING: T (TOURIST) I I ' DETAILS) 5.47 _ Shed 4.30 ° ` ------ - ° 4.71 c 4 4 4.28 a I 48 PROPOSED WOOD RAMP W/ 3 72 4. ILE5 /8 Dept. 4. �9 -i- 4. T 7. DEVELOPED USE: RESTAURANT I I o HAND �AIE�SEECONSTRUCTION `STORY � 6' Wood Fen nection OTEL 8. LAND DATA TABLE: EXISTING PROPOSED L � 8 DETAIL) MASON Tern ° °e d- 4'�� OVERHEAD BUILDING AREA: 2,071 SF (0.32 F.A.R.) 2,299 SF (0.35 F.A.R.) OT 71 #355 R y Set Bor rC BM _ 8 7 Shed BUILDING -- EXISITNG DECK: 647 SF 750 S.F. �; �"° Elevne4.68nCrete pad 5.89 5.62 4' STORY MASONRY 11 47 ELE,,_547 Asphalt Parking 4.15 9. BUILDING SETBACKS. Elevator ° y �` -' �171AIi1UFACTi9R1�1G, INC. g5 1' `� I F F Under Building REQUIRED EXISTING PROPOSED Turl'block '-L r.: .�. .. _- Con re F.F. Erosion Control - 8 F F ELEV• ELEV. 0 FRONT 1.70 (WEST TO BLDG.) 0.00 (WEST TO BLDG.) ELEV „5 =5.01 =4.73 Turfl�lnck offers specific and distinct dvanta�'s For commercial pavement excavate unsuit<tbie, � �nnn P�r I 0.00 (SOUTH TO EX. PVMT.) 0.00 (SOUTH TO EX. PVMT.) a P 4.11 8.2 5 Odin 9 0 -` onrrnilin- erosion Of, and giving soil stabilization to: unstable or unconsolidated sub grade material and 3» MIN. �erhan x1.2' 1.5'x1.5' 4.56 10' SIDE 15.96 (NORTH TO BLDG-) 15.96 (NORTH TO EX- BLDG.) �_ CONCRETE PAY/ N Column Column 1.4'x1.4' 5.00 (NORTH TO EX. PVMT.) 5.00 (NORTH TO PVMT.) stoles, emhan!mn;ents, river and low flow clianne'.s, compact the cleared area. Backfill and level «•ith 39 Column ` 4.60 5.82 (SOUTH TO BLDG.) 5.00 (SOUTH TO BLDG.) dikes, creeks, lakes, pond;, and reservoirs, where there dense graded aggregate suitable for subbase 47� - - is no extreme wave action. material (typically � -10 in.) or as etherwise �� � �� �, <, <, �, < _� '_ � �: 8-9 _- - - 0.00 (SOUTH TO EX. PVMT.) 0.00 (SOUTH TO EX. PVMT.) directed (y Site E4-10 n.) o itectlLandscape < <, _ 10' REAR 45.34 (EAST TO BLDG.) 45.34 (EAST TO BLDG.) Overflow Parkin; Architect. Place bedding course of sharp, normal ����/ ---26 ' 36 3.96 (EAST TO EX. PVMT.) 0.00 (EAST TO PVMT.) </ 'a 'n sand to a depth of / o: - - Building Overhang �= Turfblock reinforces grassy areas subjected to wheeled weight concrete or screening P 3 MIN. / � - - - traffic that would otherwise become so compacted as to approx. and seat with tamper or vibrator / / / / 4.57 4.58 inhibit the permeability of the soil structure that is uniformly level re- vegetation procedures. 1 21 ►:ecessary for the grass to survive. The hard surfaced Asphalt 12" COMPACTED SUBGRADE 10. SITE DATA TABLE: EXISTING: PROPOSED: green space created by Turfblock paving system is an bimensions - - TO 98% MAX. DENSITY ideal overflow parking facility for parks, historical Pool Area & Asphalt ,603.14 SF (0.15 AC) 6,603.14 SF (0.15 AC) sites, institutions, university and school campuses, bolt Concrete Deck BUILDING AREA(1ST FLOOR): 1,567.00 SF. 1,787.00 SF. 4.46 ASPHALT /CONCRETE: 4,420.88 SF. (0.67 ISR) 4,560.00 SF. courses and any location where public parking ::! - periodically peaks extensively beyond everyday needs. ,t;� :;: CONCRETE PAVEMENT DETAIL _ - TOTAL IMPERVIOUS 5,987.88 SF. (0.90 ISR) 6,347.00 SF. (0.96 ISR) r��+� + 3.97 TOTAL OPEN SPACE: 615.26 SF. (0.01 AC) 256.14 SF. (0.01 AC) ;i,. ar-; .ac icrzJ �Y NTS - Scenic Parlors i �c I �,' 4.51 L 50-{ St= pa L It is often necessary to provide emergency and f t �y 4. 4.29 11. THERE ARE NO ENVIROMENTALLY UNIQUE AREAS ON SITE. y p g y 1- t y„ 52 3 l' a u;'lll Tu maintenance routes tivot:gh greenspace, parkland and L, _ ,� I I I \ /C 5' Metal Rolling iJ' I ,,.., �/ L 12. ALL UNPAVED DISTURBED AREAS WITHIN RIGHT -OF -WAY SHALL BE SODDED institutional complexes. Because Turlblecic paving f� C5% r� $ _ �'''I 23 /a e F4. 21 nables the traffic to go where the brass grows, it is a -- suitable product for fire routes which, because of h� G`- 1G'(I! / Con stru et i on) AND /OR PLANTED. A R -O -W USE PERMIT WILL BE REQUIRED FOR LANDSCAPING ^'d t oin >`recns ncP AND ALL OTHER IMPROVEMENTS WITHIN R -O -W. CIVIL ENGINEERING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE PLANNING KEITH ZAYAC & ASSOCIATES, INC. (727) 793 -9888 701 ENTERPRISE ROAD E, STE 404 SAFETY HARBOR, FL 34695 WWW.KEITHZAYAC.COM EB 9351 - LC 2600212 U Q W � CYD W N� W CO F-t-•I W-I w H o��w V 1 F-{ cn W Z W z I-4 z co W > c 0 Q Z W `� �w FT-1 0 O LO fij 2 U CO ✓ U 0 r Iii Z Of W w 1--i 3 m z 0 F- IY 0 to w 0 landscaping Bens eratlons, mus rem p -• 4% TURF RFC;7ANCLES w ' H CO]I1pOSitlOri �� lilannfaCtUiC STANDARD PRE - PLANTED 4.76 13. SOLID WASTE COLLECTION CURRENTLY PROVIDED BY CITY OF CLEARWATER. o DISABLED PARKING SIGN Turfblock is made from a no -slump concrete mix. WHITE BORDER ON 1/8" THICK SHEET Made under pressure and high frequency vibrations, 2.6 ft. & SYMBOL °. ALUMINUM ,��� �o BLUE BACKGROUND 14. EDSTRIAN SIDEWALKS SHALL BE INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY Z Turfblock has a compressive strength of (6000 psi), a SG ]bs each �; 4 OF CLEARWATER'S REQUIREMENTS AND STANDARDS. ALL PROPOSED water absorption maximum of 5 %, ar.d a freeze -thaw PARKING BY res ;stGnce equal to Section S of ASTM C 67 -73. 40% open BLACK KBB°S DER DISABLED 6 W - (A - Z (/) �° SIDEWALKS SHALL NOT EXCEED A CROSS SLOPE OF 2 %. P Installation for Erosion Control Apertures 3- 9116 " x 3 -9/16" WHITE BACKGROUND pNMy 15. GUTTERS, DOWNSPOUTS, UTILITY BOXES, AND OTHER MISC. SITE FIXTURES �1� r r r r r r r, W Erosion control applications require the slope to be Pieces Per Square Feet: 0.4 BLACK BORDER $255 FlNE ��`� �z WILL BE PAINTED,SCREENED, OR OTHERWISE CONCEALED, OR BLENDED IN �•"�� k' (1,:j,) � ��e o gradcd uniformly (ideally to a 2:1 or gentler slope) & LETTERS F.S. 318.18 �vo Pieces Per Pallet: 28 WHITE BACKGROUND BUILDING ARCHITECTURE. ; �r� �. •� " ' ' • .4�� Ca . W before bcddin; Turfblock in a thin layer of sand. To prevent migratio:i of the fine rmmular material it may Square Feet in l Pallet: 75 ALL LETTERS -�, c O�IDEWALK, LL UNUSED DRIVEWAYS MUST BE REMOVED AND REPLACED WITH CURB tW . �y Z Z be necessary to place a man -made filter cloth on the Weight of I pallet: 1,550 lbs. 1" SERIES "c" " w NOTE: Concrete to be 3,000 psi, with fber mesh reinforcing. rn Z AND LANDSCAPING TO MATCH EXISTING CONDITIONS OR BETTER. graded slope before applying the sand- The filter fabric "' should permit re- vegetation. To support plant growth 2" HOT DIPPED GALVANIZED {' 4 STANDARD WEIGHT STEEL PIPE 2 -1/2" min 2" man '� W W h'.:S the otenings must be filled within'/ inch of the surface �•..�.1= >� �' N 17. ARKING TABULATION 2550 S F. RESTAURANT x 7 -15 SPACES /1000 S. F. of GFA Q � Z U, with suitable topsoil or mixture of soil and fertilizer and ?<` ; r; _.r�: .> >; >. > •no d s' .`G >E.•,�7i ->§`•� i> A> a•I I : ; >` } >._ iv 1 • 4 'J . • J,� �. then seeded, sprigged or plumaged. = of a a . >- s :c _ N EXISTING: PROVIDED: REQUIRED: "� ` �'.il.l#i�.; a W. Residential. Commercial Pavement Installation cj "Y =- ='' ``'' "' - \ \ t_. - :.; / i ��,` III a::l I• a: -III 8"X2' -6" CONCRETE MASS. . '� • • 6 5 18 -39 ' z m For residential a licatians ren►OVC soil to a depth of swr; ,�` ` ° I I FINISH TOP OF MASS LEVEL r r' p - -s f rn' PROJECT #: 710 -08 Pp ' Ir WITH A SLIGHT RAISED WASH 18. THIS PROPERTY APPEARS TO LIE WITHIN FLOOD ZONE WE" ELEV.14 approximately <I '/z in. We* and cornpaLt mea with a Po - I APPROXIMATELY 1/2" ABOVE tamper or vibrator. Spread clean sand to a depth of�. '^ ? :I b. °: LEVEL OF TURF /SOD. (- 7 -3/4' ---I B3 Bar I-- 7-1/2" --I B °r AS SHOWN ON THE FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP, COMMUNITY PANEL ORIGINAL DATE: 03.17.09 i I y,.,.� • :'4 ,� Typical Iyptccl approx. I -1 /z in. and screed level. S t Turfb:ock and ,k;.� .�. _ .,, , ;'IJ #12103C0102G, PUBLISHED BY THE FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT CHECKED BY: KZ seat Keith tamper uniformly level. y = ' TYPE A TYPE C x�� Note: AGENCY, EFFECTIVE: 09/03/03. a- DRAWN BY: RM CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA L 8" I PUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATION 4 � ENGINEERING HANDICAPPED SIGN DETAIL , IV" Updated n• � arEr�® er TYPICAL HANDICAPPED oEMAL SIGN DETAIL REV. DATE DESMOPI R APP. 1 OF 1 Centerline of wheel stops to be 30" inches from edge ..... ^ ^. ^�__ _ -_- •• of pavement. NTS -•.� tt SHEET NO. 4 OF 5 �� fk�•� ow/ kL• � to _al oI co II 14" U i GREASE HEIGHT SPREAD ° TRAPS /1 U � N 34 \ / \x5% CO FERTILIZER TABLETS AS O rb SPECIFIED. PLACE UNIFORMLY G AROUND ROOT MASS o O / BETWEEN MIDDLE AND C' ` BOTTOM OF ROOT MASS \ \// / \/ \ / / \ \ / / \ / / \ //\ � N � -� POINT OF CURVE (not found) I Q, u Asphalt a 3 TO 5 TIMES WIDTH Co N See�por°ry B _ Inlet #1 O I/ I o OF ROOTBALL rV BackBof'Gut @ Rim 5.41 6' v 1 Retenti po �° SHRUB & GROUNDCOVER PLANTING DETAIL °O 4 G / no M Elev.= 5,5purb Inv 12t, PVC NE 2 Retann9 Wall k 4 Ch a' Lrnk / IrJ Q 60 L� J� I Q) �I LOT 69 �' I I 4 Chain Link Fen U et C 0 a_ Concrete L e ti e / c° o a rJ W N a �I Found 12„ EXISTING ALM �' ° ` I Top 6 �'` TO REMA Asphalt TO R AIW" Oak ` � I / / o a I Concrete I I rXen Oak to a My 15" RCP 2.69 J 4r S Inv 1 P C II / I x Cut X I � � 14 ' 12„ 2' "F" Cur &'To 2., VC 2 53 4 ° n Link en e � 6" - 12" PVC Storm � ��o _ � / Op 6' O Ron c• Block \ \ _ EXI TIN 2' �� nce 7„ Oak Retention o Wo!/ III nd u I �, of - k I r) U O O o GOncrete`� �/� I Con I u I I o SP 3 Io_ (D I ° Turf Black Lj_ c C7 I L - / l 2 I T 00 Q / / 1 4: N (2) 20'x20' �°, / SITE TRIANGLE Q) _% 0 I (2) ' (2) I o v / 4 W I 9.60, I I _ 5.5' LL LLJ I ° O / a o` / LL_ I Q o ° o ^ / N / I o I 16 9' � �F F o I co o 69 , 50 v _ N Wood eOk r� °' I 6. 9, IRI ® C 35 - II ®I Overhang `n 35, (p) I I w /gutter e I 5 w° od ncroachin9 Goncrete Fen Oe i Flurne cI Q) FF, (a I I v ELEV l I -° 0 -4.40 WM JJ IS d G f 1 WOp F �� II U enOe qPn Re 5 h �, `D I 2 �'1 R NEA1'r LOT 119 Cos F /us �r 3' Ch TOR y /�qn S Sul °tor Steel .. ain Link F 'v,�'1 (bOlte Plates Fence °und C. d down 22.0' 4 "k4., IN• y NRaised vCo d re �1 � I NO 1. p Numbe " '�D pR SONR Mo 20.9• Wood Sheds r AMC F, F F P Drain ELEV F' -LEV 16 45 A/C Pod ' n , o � Wood Es Stairs r► mDrain 26.9' `° 6.3' 7 S�0 rORY Few '9 CI� l ^ C"i R #351 l ° 5" R /sed # Concrete o oeod Deck / 0 ,� P,P 1, I / � Concrete m Concrete ELEV, / m Wood ` 1 =6.06 L � _ ° 11" Shed co co Gas Pool Heater c s x 3' 45.95' • <`�'' - Regulator A/C pad 0 r < • '' v 6 Tree Asphalt < Pavement I Mason 4' C r l l /III < .� < ry o .� I Wall ncrete Block Wall ' <,, �• ,.<< Transformer I I - off, on Concrete N I �i ' ' _ "< , ,�• � 1.5'x1.5' II o 95 1 COncr�te < , < ..a CO Column F I Wood Shed E F F LEV °5.47 ;� I •� X Tz � ° I c ° T-EL Fire F. C. I. R. 5 8' C) Ig° F 3 S,' 6' ILLEGIBLE Dept. I �a F' ELEV _5 48 OR y M WOOd Fence Connection a� I �SQ Tern, d I " LOT 71 #35 NRy Q, Porory B Shed I VI l 5 Carrier B°CoCut on Elev. 68nCrete pad I � F LOT 120 1.5'x1.5' Column Building Overhan< RITZ MOTEL OVERHEAD BUILDING 4 STORY MASONRY Ia ELEV; Asphalt Parking I I S. Elevator 95.1' 47 N I Under Building L-e-t1ilding Ove �On _ Concrete FF ELEV. ELEV. II p c 2 9 ELEV '5 3 =5.01 =4.73 v O + -ding O�erhOn 9 x1.2' Column 1.5' 1.4'x1.4' I I � � Column Column I + / — II - Ia - - Building Overhang - 1I o — o — 00 Asphalt I I -- -- alt I Pool Area & Asphalt I / Concrete Deck \(1 I FIFTH A VE N U 5' Metal Railing E — — — _ - b Under Construction) San MH #4 Rim 3.56 (Paved over) N.T.S. C O ,O MULCH 3" FROM STEMS 3" MULCH LAYER PREPARED PLANTING SOIL - EXISTING UNDISTURBED SOIL GRAPHIC SCALE 10 0 5 10 20 ( IN FEET ) 1 inch = 10 ft. PLANT LIST LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE SYMBOL NO. SCIENTIFIC NAME TREES LJ 2 LIGUSTRUM JAPONICUM SP 3 SABAL PALMETTO SG 5 COCCOLOBA UVIFERA RI 35 RAPHIOLEPIS INDICA TILLED AND LOOSENED NATIVE SOIL BACKFILL ROOTBALL FERTILIZER TABLETS AS SPECIFIED. PLACE UNIFORMLY AROUND ROOT MASS BETWEEN MIDDLE AND BOTTOM OF ROOT MASS. COMMON NAME SIZE REQUIREMENTS SOUTHERN WAX PRIVET 2'Y2" CAL. (12' HT.) SABAL PALM 10' -12' C.T.H. SEAGRAPE 3 GALLON, 2' HIGH 3' O.C. INDIAN HAWTHORN 3 GALLON, 2' HIGH 3' O.C. ALL SHRUBS /GROUNDCOVER TO BE TRIANGULAR SPACING. SEE PLANT LIST FOR (O.C.) SPACING. 18" MIN. SETBACK FOR SHRUBS & GROUNDCOVERS BACK OF CURB/ BED LINE PLANT SPACING DETAIL (SECTION) N.T.S. OF THE ROOTBALL PALM PLANTING DETAIL N.T.S. AT AND IF SCARS, BATTENS, E" STEEL BANDS. BRACE (3 EA, MIN.) TENS & STAKES ;3) 2 "x4 "x36" WOODEN STAKES i" SOIL SAUCER AROUND 'LANTING HOLE. 3" MULCH LAYER EXISTING UNDISTURBED SOIL 4, q r O " Q CIVIL ENGINEERING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE PLANNING KEITH ZAYAC & ASSOCIATES, INC. (727) 793 -9888 701 ENTERPRISE ROAD E, STE 404 SAFETY HARBOR, FL 34695 WWW.KEITHZAYAC.COM EB 9351 - LC 2600212 C) Q w co (saw Q� �awQ Q Q Q Fw-I w TTV��/111' Imo' el z W Ell- Q FT-r �I W � w ►-4 W Mwr, w �D �y FT-, Q rl O LO fij U CO z 1 W 2 0 C) v Z O O W M CL W } 00 Z O H o_ U 07 W 0 W Q 0 z r Z. _ U_ ••i w 1 rz W. �Ir Q PROJECT #: 710 -08 ORIGINAL DATE: 04.01.08 CHECKED BY: KZ DRAWN BY: RM SHEET NO. 5 OF 5 v 6'� 1 I J Q f _____- 6 SECTION 7&8 TOWNSHIP 29 SOUTH RANGE 15 EAST 58 ,i © e:3 c� ir_3irici I I �r�I I- i is 1M "M'Mimi©ie_3ini1_-3i ©iui�r_1ie-�i MATCHLIN INE 'A' l3e .7i 1 s � ®i ir�irair.� 11 • I 3.74 / r 1 3.89 4/2 14 5.41 I N I f -� .� gp 5.13 ob PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA II I I 3.90 4 37 � 1 .23 GREASE 0 4.7$ 5.53 `•- I I�CO _ 5.54 TI, 4.69�Valley Curb \:T I ' �l I / i4.67 X4.69 4.56 'col cu c� 5.48 ` ` 0 I I q I / I 4.67 NI POINT 0 CURVE (not found) f- 5 4.7 A / . .56 Allcr ,)OM S -rGR�, A L /bS Mg SO #347 CRY a +5.82 u� 4.30 +�4 9 I I / �a l 4.3 /4.80 I -}- 4.50 \ \ ' / N / Set B ry SM - Inlet .41 -�- 4.57 \ N �Il Back Cut ro 5.41 Il // I % 4.19 I / 3.80 Cie k_550urb ® Inv p53 VC 4.30 T `.59 I -�- 4.36 / 1 r43.54 f /7Q 4.94 4.60 \ NE 2.6p 4.56 I / a. '85.25 4.93 C7 a � ! i ► / I ! � ill ' a 5.41 LOT 69 1 / I / 3.99 � l4. ill 0 / I 37 5.35 TO I I Ij 4.46 +4.51 ( l I ' rU/ r \ r l Q 'CJI / I I cE �1 11 f O ! I I I +4.21 / I w !I!l Fou 5.1 5.74 V f I/I 'l 4,X4 d C M. 12" l/ I O ! N I I TOP l Asphalt l (J) 1 j l l' / I/ t /I 3.53 3'3 6 11 l a �9 °-_._ 6 � ! 4, 0 /{- _ ' 11 0 ! j I / I x Cut X l f c 4.56 2 12� ,`,� _ 2' "fi ur&-- ` °k l I s 6" _ _�_ - l -z - _ _ 12_' PV( I 6��= 4548 12 TOII CB w�_J °s�` 0 „Q5.63 - - `'-,l 4.48 13.90 -\ > � 4.92 -� + 5.66 / I I I / --° '` 7 6 " /ant COcrn L O eted 3.88 3.42 `4-5-R6 _ 6' kod v I 4.23 I / / ® V Ill I _ turf Block r 3.92 / 0 3 v 13, p, !1 / / %�� CC I I 4.10 `f- 3.66 ' c %�� I/ 3.7 .18 ri 603 Pegu/at `� _ N I 3.8 .2 r 20 p• 9 - - 9u /ator f/ � W p / ! j ! 3.34 I N / r 1.4 " moo_ / � _ / I ! 3.74 3 11 io rr N Roised vCOh 4.38 / \`�•� 3/7 rate / l - l I I 1 1 I c, I / a�i Bfip (2) ,� PPEN Mop Draln 5.05 ° d / / i 3 I / ! / 3.811 �, a ( P. P. E� aln 4.8 1 1 l 1 / / 1 ; a r Ev.,6 4 Z if 1 / l f 111 60 rr '., rJ � U � S / 5 5' ` Ill / •� / 2 I f ��,�, I r " r `` r S / 3.62 LL - / / C° f / / �� % �"O F e44 C / O x,84_ / r �, RAM as r 51 � l q oI rr ° N rr 16 9, F F ECEV _6 / �v� 1 r 28 / N76 °� , I fl ! / 4 kd C.M rr Ir N,3.4' j�7 4.88 / / 4g /W 50 fA t / TOp 4 B r 69 °k n r r 3 22.7' I4 � 4. Wood Deck ~ f c 0 5 / l / / / l / I I 3' •+• 05/ % r = = 6 9' ko 4.71 O � 1 / 5.53J 5.99 / v Aspholt 1 9 / ari 5.96i� o O �t SRete I o 6. v 1 n t, ! o Retal�9 Block 5.451- 5 `89�.�. 4' C / / Pond / �i- 5.Or91} 4487 Wall lI L.26`- h/arr/ Cink� 5.03 10 5.23 5.42 -`1 e` 5.38 * 11.,38 5.33 11.34 / / � �� �•- 11.3 4' 11 81 �/ / 5.43 / Chain Link Fence / Concrete L° 5.32 or J all c l! ! f 5.33 Conc, 52l� Inv 1.5 RCP 5.2j -�yE5.41 / /I 0, 2.69 5.64IS30_ _ II l/ 5.00 Inv 12„ PVC 2 53 5.49 5 �4`_. 0 .5 $nkfi -�-�Sj T f �" �- 5.0,3: , /I f 5.6 t�" n 4.94 .62/ 'iC 5.07 5.06 � l ` O� ndTurf Block loc c 0 erhon .90 '35' (P) 9 tter t1PInlet #3 9� � / - 4.7_ 2 _ ncr °h _ 1,g COncretThroat 3.04 Wood 6 Inv 15" DIP E 0.59 3.74 MO 4. SOnry W °11 4.7ee 45 95'V _ 4.72 4-75 10Qk Wall 1 \r\ 3.48 3.64 I I I f ` /I f 4.76 95 1� 1 _ �_'' / _ 1 0 /!� Stor / / = / / f f f l 30 // / F �cre�(jL^�"- // / co fl fII o 47 4.72 / 3.46 ` `3.32 /�\ I / 1 / 5.48 fiF 3 s T� "{,� 6, Wood (� / / I / I o + E�EV. �5 R Y U °d Fen --\ / l I l r 48 M soar T °. A if/ / Co % I / �l r LOT 71 #35 RY set Porory BM e 3.33 13 70 `" 3. / l l l I f / Elev Corner COncreon Inlet #2 / 4,68 to pad / _\\ 1 1 f l �/ o Rim 3.60 r - \ \ / I 47 9 F F ECEV Throat 2.82 1 ± 3.34 3 36 ® \ \ \ / f / %/ �Q S.42 Inv 15„ DIP W 0.24 \ \ / l o, Build 5' 1 • n Inv 15 DIP E 0.49 I I d �! \ y \ I / / / u / 8 ��!�] pverh - _ - Concrete \ �5,. / o � on 9 -� ^ ".F,- 7K 3154 \ I �- 4° 3 ~-- _ 39 = 0 / \ \ ��A I / I I U / 074.54 t I - �Buildln9 0 3131 / `\ to / / 1 3.97 �/// --- _ - - '�erhOn�_ -I41w - 39 - C / `1\ IN IN \ ! / ! / 1-4.39 +4.47 -- \ CO 3.58 `� IN l \�\ 11 ro \ l L._•_____ / / \ \ I I Asp''° 3 333.40 \ Storm MH #1 Q �I-3.33 Rim 3.10 -1-3.97 '- Bottom -1.45 / p Full of water I I FIFTH AVENU t 4. 9 E Sa . (under a� (fig nMH #4 construction) �.... \t-/ Rim 3.56 [f (Paved over) QU FOR NOTES AND LEGEND SEE SHEET 2 of 2 F F, v ELEV, i c4 40 ®1 2 APARTMeN 'Found STORY I� Ts ';<, C M. q n'� M,4 CSO/VR Y + 4.98 1. D Number ,V pRAP46 /V .85 F.F E�EV. IV Tree _4 4.46 Dept. r Connection r Asphalt Pavement GRAPHIC SCALE 10 0 5 10 20 ( IN FEET ) 1 inch = 10 ft. LOT 119 LOT 120 +5-15 +4.80 N9 (Z-101' 1.5'x1.5' - - Column E3Gallding Overhang RIT TEL OVERHEAD BUILDING 4.45 4 STORY MASONRY Asphalt Parking +4.15 �- F.F. Under Building ELEV. =4.73 4-6 1.5'x1.5' - -- - - - - - \ 4.56 1.41V1 a' --+4.51 I _ o FN &D SHEET 1 of 2 U Z W 0) Q U U _ _ Q U 0 W m 0-16 = 0 + 0 c a = � U W M LL 00 O 0 N 00 ^II Q) 22 U Q_ � o 3 O U 00 V C'! 0 3 a� c» �00 - -- __ > r 00 � o � o u) CL w � I r LL L0 O Q0 w N LLJ C6 o! 0 IL J I 2 LL o��Zo >> N 5a0> 2,t °Z¢ ¢ .c "Z_ FW- S V') �0RH Q VWQx°� L0 a_= r ° d Z - J� o N oZ�" . >- +r Jd, w E ay6 j U� o >- c w 0. NL p(n C U w �y 0 411- Q� W J M Y J QLL_ J 1- Q wU) 0 O 0 J O r O O) LLJ 00 Q� I V)Ln O00 U r V) Z X O Q U i Q� rr � O OLC) F- 00 >- ro IY 00 Q 00 0 M n d' m v ^• A I W- FLOOR PLAN 1/411 = 1' -Or' U) Y Q W 0' W Q 0 W lY ISSUE DATE: ARCHITECT: ANDY DOHMEN PROJ MANAGER: DR SCALE: AS NOTED PROJECT NUMBER: #0833 FLOOR PLAN �a Cc a`�' er ICjN S ^p� I LES U `D as J c� Gj J d as E S w O r s -p ARCH ITECTURE CC �� • 2907 State Road 590 d O LL Suite 5 00 0 Clearwater, FL 33759 Dui n p 727.797.4420 f 727.797.9218 U designstylesinc.com —' ui �- *AA0003393 ° U) Y Q W 0' W Q 0 W lY ISSUE DATE: ARCHITECT: ANDY DOHMEN PROJ MANAGER: DR SCALE: AS NOTED PROJECT NUMBER: #0833 FLOOR PLAN �a Cc a`�' a ate„ U `D J Gj J S +p O -p �� • f t'x1 d O LL OJ U) Y Q W 0' W Q 0 W lY ISSUE DATE: ARCHITECT: ANDY DOHMEN PROJ MANAGER: DR SCALE: AS NOTED PROJECT NUMBER: #0833 FLOOR PLAN �a Cc a`�' U `D Gj J S +p O -p �� d O LL OJ 00 0 0� U Dui n o # Q U —' ui �- d ° >) U S of -> 7- U(4- 01 Ln L� (y) U) Y Q W 0' W Q 0 W lY ISSUE DATE: ARCHITECT: ANDY DOHMEN PROJ MANAGER: DR SCALE: AS NOTED PROJECT NUMBER: #0833 FLOOR PLAN �a Cc a`�' FR.09 f.74 E 0 M 00 rn 0 0 N ri 0 CL rn 3 v rn - 0 I N O I 0 I u! .c 0 LL 0 U O w t U C 8 c� OE 0 ui Z a CP -- T V vV N POINT OF found) 4.67 4 CURVE (not - 4.30 4 9 5 10 a 5. As 5.53 5.99 I 4.3 c0 ` Tern Pholt a �v 4.80 4.57 4.50 N 4C 130�kBo Pe'ror -Cut @_ /n/et lr s 47 5.96 t9 t/ I o M Oev _5 SOurb !nv fat 4.53 RetCOnc Bloc 5.45 15�8.�9)�\. �O � ]I 5. 4.19 0 2" 4. aini k / 4.60 VC NE 2.60 ng °ll 'Chair{ Link 5.03 I' J 5.23 4.36 3.54 3 79 �4 ence / �. 59 I 4 5.42 4.56 � I � 4• � 4.93 L, a 1 LOT 69 5.38 38 ` 4,8,35/ 37 3.99 f + 5.08 5.35 5.3 5.33 193 3 11.3 4' C + 5.13 4.46 '90 I v / / 5.43 Chain Clnk F 4.51 cI a I �F ence i o v COncrete �/ 51.9 I 5•E& J 4.21 v 5.74 5.32 a co Foun 3 � 4 „k4,a c.M 12.' 5. 1 5.33 � � / / o � a 9 As t 4" 0 ` v ° CO / 3.48 / aT °P n O� \ Phgl °k ,nv 2 5.2 4 ° a �J / ncrete GRAPHIC SCALE 15 10 0 5 10 20 I 3.53 3.6 ,� 49 6 1 1n RCP 2.69 5.64 I X Cut X 1 4. y9 S&To v 12„ PVC 2.53 5.49 5 �� °n5C 1 514.�d � 5.00 5.03 _ 5.6 n en 4.6 5.07 4. 6 � . 2 8' ( ) ° 6 6 B _ 5.26- 12" PVC Storm i 4 5 + 5.06 IN FEET I ` 67� _ � s � ,37 5.63 � ____ one '� � 7 1 inch 10 ft" .54 / EXIS �Qp�k 1 6' Wood e 2.53 Retai B /ock 84 5.02 '° TING F nce R nin �8 I �Ir 4.92 8 HEDCE i 5.66 2' ••F,. Cur / 0Ok etenttiio-7n Pond I 5��0 LEGEND QOO�p , 4 J / I O N 1 COncret I° ,ii � °. � 3.4 3.88 e� % iv C' a �� � 0 t �WOp =Fen . 1 4.35 nC Fl ume Lt I l / v� ELEV (TYP.) TYPICAL i m a 3.V�4 ° 5 ? T `� e =� 5.4 \ 4.8 4.47 a ;4 40 W 4.23 3 I v 13 _ _ urf °4ck 4.89 293 Wood n 4.67 III .97 �� PROJECT BOUNDARY 92 aJ q p RT 4.10 3.6 6 °' /� 3.7 0 �V O -- 3.8 ` 8 / 20 p C s Re9ulgtor Flush Ste 3' Chain ` 2 M� LOT 119 �--. PROPOSED I 3.34 N 5.1L eo ^ iba /ted d el plates 2Link Fence 4 Found CM s'TORy N %s' CONCRETE PAVEMENT 3 7 v _ o / N Raisedv0o dre 4. 80^ �� oWn) 0 I Nok4D ANA MgSO�R 1 4.98 3.74 4A ID y IC --1 . � � ° BFp i2) ry d / A4 20' 9' 1 .05 �B RIC N PAVERS Sheds 2 Number R/qM� +4.80 °P pr 57 7 1 F 3 x.72 l FF °1n 4,8� OR EQUAL E� GENERAL SITE NOTES: �l / EXISTING ME�I•,Ai�lf�A m f V. I � 0 3' 7 EQUIPMENT & SH 4. WHEEL STOP (TYP.) =5.11 _ I I _ �. 4.93 �, / TO REMAIN 5.34• / 1. ENGINEER /LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT: KEITH ZAYAC & ASSOCIATES, INC. a 701 ENTERPRISE ROAD EAST, SUITE 404 C) � � _ � 1 �- l FRFNcH - • 4 " � + 9?4 4 5.0 WOOd I I I - l sovT �' s 4S 1 'St SAFETY SAFETY HARBOR, FL 34695 C) I3.2 - o / a \/ / 2 S H BFq 11 35 4� ri 5 26 (727) 793 -9888 Bus V -3 l ° ° in l TORY FR cH /� 0 9 3 9 N 4. i - (727) 793 -9855 Fax I I ° o _ ° / i ^ #3g 1 FRAME (EXIST / ;� l 5.10 R 4 4 .0 6 ` 40406 `� T OR / 1 0' a / t'S67SF N' / 4%? 1 m 5 / Con�crra wo 4 94 # 2. DEVELOPER NAME: FRENCHY'S SOUTH BEACH, INC. /MICHAEL PRESTOi 4.03 / DECK E PiNSIO _ / "'` 1 FF EC / O cam, 5. + _ete e °d eck `� 419 EASTSHORE DR. I (� (SEE AR H91ETAIL PLAN ° _ EV =6 28 / �l 4.59 ~ P• 5.24 /4 8 4 O �oncret 6 CLEARWATER FL. 33767 3 7 FOR CON PT UCTIO . -� / / 5.95 e N F ' N� o ) ? / / ° 4.9 EbF (727) 449 -2729 Bus 6 S2 r l + 4. x N 3.4 4.88 / Woo 8 Concrete �6 0 (727) 446 -0588 Fax I 113 35 Tb -f� 7 r � 24' a Shea `g ` 6 6g, 5� V P Brok n + 22. l ti 11" / .92 a 8 co 3. ARCHITECT NAME: SPENCER AND ASSOCIATES ARCHITECTURE, I I 4.0 0 0 •�4�10 �� eck ,� rn o 22 co / 18, 4 �°'- 4 Gas 4. 1 3g P.O. BOX 306 INC. (�) I �j PRO OS D �1 LDING Po 4.05 / 6.30 �� NTRACTOR TO 4.62 °I 6 4.6 8 INDIAN ROCKS BEACH FLORIDA 33785 co 228 SIF 71 �$ TRIPE W ICK 6 Q) Heater 4 (727) 449 -2724 Bus I I � 3' \ 6 4.90. FFE= 6.28 4. WHITE TRAFFIC PAI 45.9 ' ' < <, ,... 4 R °s k 3' 727 442 -7192 Fax I l� 4 N4.6 4 6.28 5 4.6 0 e9ulot A/C ( ) 113 65 verho N < , 6., Tree or Pqd � 4. SURVEYOR NAME: SUNCOAST LAND SURVEYING, INC. 35 (P) I ng w /gutter 6.28 4'69 :<4'4 �1 111 FOREST LAKES BOULEVARD I I encro . 75 < , OLDSMAR �� � Asphalt FLORIDA 34677 I 5' Woo Pence °Ch'n9 COncret �_ 4.90 4 4.46 Pavement (813) 854 -1342 Phone Wood e CONCRETE I I 1/3 50 2N8 °nry Wall .70 4' Cone "/ N <f '• PAVEMENT LO (813) 855 -6890 Fax re ry 4.7 5B1Ock WO // / , " `' ` °'' 269 on 5. PROJECT ADDRESS: I o n Concrete PARCEL ID # 07/29/15/52380/000 /0700 3.64 I N PROPOSED NEW 4'76 95 4`< _< � �M6 1.5'x1.5' CLEARWATER BEACH, FL 33767 I I�3 DECK (SEE ARCH. PLANS 1 Concrete < < ,' .a 437 Column I FOR CONSTRUCTION FF + 443 1.5'x1.5' 6. ZONING: o I o DETAILS) �® ECeV �5.4j flood Shed 4.30 Column Building Overhang T (TOURIST) I ® 28 � , 4.71 8 4. 4 • a / 48 PROPOSED WOOD RAMP W/ 72 4 5 /8•,Fire 4. 4. 7. DEVELOPED USE: ! RESTAURANT ARCH. PLANS 3 / I / HA1�D �(�BV SEE CONSTRUCTION STORY 6' d ILL'L AXE Deft. � T by °O A CIVIL ENGINEERING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE " u rblock , .. ! , p 1 MANUFACTURING, INC. .. Erosion Control Turfblock offers specific and distinct advanta,es For commercial pavement excavate unsuitable controlling erosion of, and giving soil stabilization to: unstable or unconsolidated sub grade material an slopes, eittban!cments, river and low flow channels, compact the cleared area. Back-fill and level witl dikes, creeks, lakes, ponds, and reservoirs, where there dense graded aggregate suitable for subbas is no extreme wave action. material (typically 4 -10 in.) or as otherwis directed by Site Engineer /Architect /Landscap Overflow Parking Architect. Place bedding course of sharp, norm Turfblock reinforces grassy areas subjected to wheeled weight concrete or screening sand to a depth o traffic that would otherwise become so compacted as to approx. and seat with tamper or vibrato inhibit the permeability of the soil structure that is uniformly level re- vegetation procedures. necessary for the grass to survive. The hard surfaced green space created by Turfblock paving system is an Dimensions ideal overflow parking facility for parks, historical sites, institutions, university and school campuses, golf courses and any location where public parking1 periodically peaks extensively beyond everyday needs. Scenic Parks it is often necessary to provide ennergency and ' ,.,, "� - `` maintenance routes through teens pace parkland and •'i "III ' institutional complexes. Because Turfblock paving it is I' enables the traffic to go where the grass grows, a Q C• suitable product for fire routes which, because of IS 1l rr -J landscaping considerations, must remain greenspace. rURr RECTANCt Composition & Manufacture Turfblock is made from a no -slump concrete nnix. Made tinder pressure and high frequency vibrations, 2.6 ft. Turfblock has a compressive strength of (6000 psi), a 56 ]bs each water absorption maximum of 5 %, and a freeze -thaw resistance equal to Section 8 of ASTM C 67 -73. 40% open Installation for Erosion Control Apertures 3- 9116 " x 3- 9/16" Erosion control applications require the slope to be Pieces Per Square Feet: 0.4 graded uniformly (ideally to a 2:1 or gentler slope) Pieces Per Pallet: 28 - before bedding Turfblock in a thin layer of sand. To prevent migration of the fine granular material it may Square Feet in 1 Pallet: 75 be necessary to place a man -made filter cloth on the Weight of 1 pallet: 1,550 lbs. graded slope before applying the sand. The filter fabric should permit re- vegetation. To support plant growth the openings must be filled within'/ inch of the surface::' O with suitable topsoil or mixture of soil and fertilizer and LD Lid then seeded, sprigged or plugged. '�= �' =:af - > ''`''} CO 0 W Residential and Commercial Pavement Installation Z U o TI-� U v For residential applications remove soil to a depth of � ;�; ;, „_� r4. ,� ,.� - �•s' w approximately 4 '/z in. Wet and compact area with a n� a tamper or vibrator. Spread clean sand to a depth of -�' approx. 1 -1 '/Z in. and screed level. Set Turfblock ands , ?w seat with tamper uniformly level.;. ��8 M Fenc nection EXISTING PROPOSED DETAIL�)OT 71 #3 ASONRy Temp e d, 4' �� OVERHEAD 8 BUILDING NG A EALE 2,071 SF (0.32 F.A.R.) 2,299 SF (0.35 F.A.R.) 5 Se ox-C B Shed BUILDING EXISTING DECK: 647 SF 750 S.F.( Jr Corn e°k_Cu t on 8.7 5.8 9 5.62 Elev._ Con °rete Pad 4 STORY MASONRY 4.68 47 FF ELEV.;5 3 Asphalt Parking + 4.15 9. BUILDING SETBACKS: g5 1, 47 N Elevator Under Building REQUIRED EXISTING PROPOSED COn re 8 I F F ELEV. O' FRONT 1.70 (WEST TO BLDG. 0.00 WEST TO BLDG. F•F E� ELEV. 0.00 (SOUTH TO EX. PVMT.) 0.00 (SOUTH TO EX. PVMT.) _ EV, �3,g ' = -V- 4.11 8.25din9 Ov 000 PJI I =5.01 -4.73 4.56 10' SIDE 15.96 JI 1 -) x1.5' (NORTH TO BLDG.) 15.96 (NORTH TO EX. BLDG.) 1 ' 3" MIN. =rho_ CONCRETE P N Column Column 1.4'x1'4' 5.00 (NORTH TO EX. PVMT.) 5.00 (NORTH TO PVMT.) Column 5.82 (SOUTH TO BLDG.) 5.00 (SOUTH TO BLDG.) 4-47 39 4.60 e 4}:7q� _ 0.00 (SOUTH TO EX. PVMT.) 0.00 (SOUTH TO EX. PVMT.) C - `' -_ 10' REAR 45.34 (EAST TO BLDG.) 45.34 (EAST TO BLDG.) al ��� / `' _ 4 +24 36 3.96 (EAST TO EX. PVMT.) 0.00 (EAST TO PVMT.) f / / a - - Building Overhang r �3/ MIN. J 4.57 - --I- 4.58 1 21 _ Asphalt 12" COMPACTED SUBGRADE 10. SITE DATA TABLE: EXISTING: PROPOSED: 1 _ & Pool Area Asphalt TO 98% MAX. DENSITY SITE AREA: 6,603.14 SF (0.15 AC) 6,603.14 SF (0.15 AC) C 1_ _ BUILDING AREA(1ST FLOOR): 1,567.00 SF. 1,787.00 SF. Concrete Deck 4.46 ASPHALT /CONCRETE: 4,420.88 SF. (0.67 ISR) 4,560.00 SF. - - CONCRETE PAVEMENT DETAIL - _ TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA: 5,987.88 SF. (0.90 ISR) 6,251.00 SF. (0.95 ISR) / � + 3.9 7 NTS TOTAL OPEN SPACE: 615.26 SF. (0.01 AC) 352.14 SF. (0.01 AC) -.� -__ 4.51 TH AVENU 4. 4.29 5' Metal Railing 11. THERE ARE NO ENVIROMENTALLY UNIQUE AREAS ON SITE. 12. ALL UNPAVED DISTURBED AREAS WITHIN RIGHT -OF -WAY SHALL BE SODDED Construction) AND /OR PLANTED. A R -O -W USE PERMIT WILL BE REQUIRED FOR LANDSCAPING 4 " AND ALL OTHER IMPROVEMENTS WITHIN R -O -W. ES • STANDARD PRE - PAINTED DISABLED PARKING SIGN 4.76 13. SOLID WASTE COLLECTION CURRENTLY PROVIDED BY CITY OF CLEARWATER. WHITE BORDER ON 1/8- THICK SHEET + ac SYMBOL O, ALUMINUM ,ry + 14. PEDSTRIAN SIDEWALKS SHALL BE INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY BLUE BACKGROUND• \� 1ti,� PARKING BY 0 ro OF CLEARWATER'S REQUIREMENTS AND STANDARDS. ALL PROPOSED BLACK BORDER DISABLED ; & LETTERS PERMIT , o�° SIDEWALKS SHALL NOT EXCEED A CROSS SLOPE OF 2 %. y �. o�O' WHITE BACKGROUND ONLY ,� 15. GUTTERS, DOWNSPOUTS, UTILITY BOXES, AND OTHER MISC. SITE FIXTURES BLACK LETTERS $255 FINE ��� ,`i WILL BE PAINTED,SCREENED, OR OTHERWISE CONCEALED, OR BLENDED IN WHITE BACKGROUND F.S. 318.18 BUILDING ARCHITECTURE. ALL LETTERS Z � 1" SERIES "C" N Imo, 16. ALL UNUSED DRIVEWAYS MUST BE REMOVED AND REPLACED WITH CURB, NOTE: Concrete to be 3,000 psi, with fiber mesh reinforcing. 2" HOT DIPPED GALVANIZED SIDEWALK, AND LANDSCAPING TO MATCH EXISTING CONDITIONS OR BETTER. I STANDARD WEIGHT STEEL PIPE � � 2 -1/2" min � I-- 2' min ; I 1 T- � �_ I � 17. PARKING TABULATION 2550 S.F. RESTAURANT x 7 -15 SPACES /1000 S.F. of GFA iz EXISTING: PROVIDED: REQUIRED: � 6 5 18 -39 :I I 8'X2' -6" CONCRETE MASS. FINISH TOP OF MASS LEVEL _ -III ' •° I Ir � •III -_ -i- � ' - • . -I I I rl APPROXIMATELY 1/2�ABOVEH n n= II 18. THIS PROPERTY APPEARS TO LIE WITHIN FLOOD ZONE VE (ELEV.14) LEVEL OF TURF /SOD. �-- 7 -3/4- ----� #3 Bai �- - 7 -1/2" -I #3 Bar AS SHOWN ON THE FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP COMMUNITY PANEL C= "I a I I a C= S �I ° TYPE A TYPE C Typical #12103COl02G, PUBLISHED BY THE FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT Note: AGENCY EFFECTIVE: 09/03/03. W` -1�� a + Centerline of wheel stops 0 Fit CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA to be 30" inches from edge 8' PUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATION of pavement. � ENGINEERING WHEEL STOP DETAIL HANDICAPPED SIGN DETAIL L*daW r,,. LLQ a»BY TYPICAL HANDICAPPED .M NM NTS Ms.- m SIGN DETAIL 1t0 REV DATE OE9GtP110N APR M.0 1 OF 1 CIVIL ENGINEERING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE PLANNING KEITH ZAYAC & ASSOCIATES, INC. (727) 793 -9888 701 ENTERPRISE ROAD E, STE 404 SAFETY HARBOR, FL 34695 WWW.KEITHZAYAC.COM EB 9351 - LC 2600212 mC)w E-I CO (D C) U� E1 W d <1 I W INSN Z W � a Q C• w rr -J W 1-4 Q �rJ �0 Q w O LD Lid Cd 2 CO 0 W Z U o TI-� U v w Z �{ F_ W n� a U m Z O a > U w 07 w 0 rn o C14 w Q 0 T O Z XW >,- (n- ',0ZU) o �3tttrt,rtA �` ,��w tt U) Kw r Tv� s '► eA.f I.... , ., 11 Q' \Et o�z =� s } Z V • <t, ti, Z r•, 7 O • is P1 ��• a W >o' Z DO PROJECT #: 710 -08 ORIGINAL DATE: 03.17.09 CHECKED BY: KZ DRAWN BY: RM SHEET NO. 4 OF 5