Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
FLD2007-06020
loop, -d Jv a BF -o Ab, Dot 7IS.fV ';ffAw FOA k�, I Clearwater Planning Department 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, Florida 33756 Telephone: 727 - 562 -4567 Fax: 727 - 562 -4865 ❑ SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION ❑ SUBMIT 14 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION - Plans and application are required to be collated, stapled, and folded into sets ❑ SUBMIT APPLICATION FEE $ CASE #: RECEIVED BY (staff initials): DATE RECEIVED: * NOTE: 15 TOTAL SETS OF INFORMATION REQUIRED (APPLICATIONS PLUS SITE PLAN SETS) WAU1sJ36 WN11914® FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project (Revised 10/25/2006) — PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT— A. APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4- 202.A) APPLICANT NAME: Lucca Development, LLC MAILING ADDRESS: 9011 S. Natoma Ave., Oak Lawn, IL 60453 PHONE NUMBER: (708) 430 -0905 CELL NUMBER: (708) 430 -3720 PROPERTY OWNER(S): Lucca Development, LLC List ALL owners on the deed AGENT NAME: Water Resource Associates, Inc. - Clint CufFle MAILING ADDRESS: 4260 West Linebaugh Avenue, Tampa, FL 33624 PHONE NUMBER: (813) 265 -3130 FAX NUMBER: (813) 265 -6610 CELL NUMBER: (813) 362 -5088 E -MAIL ADDRESS: ccuffle @wraconsultants.com B. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4- 202.A) PROJECT NAME: Marbella Parking Garage - Parcel B PROJECT VALUATION: $ 11,500,000 STREET ADDRESS See Attachment N PARCEL NUMBER(S): See Attachment N PARCEL SIZE (acres): Parcels A: 1.41 ac / B: 0.93 ac / C: 0.03 ac PARCEL SIZE (square feet): A: 61,212 / B: 40,546 / C: 1,381 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Legal Description is located on the Attached Boundary Survey PROPOSED USE(S): DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST: Specifically identify the request (include number of units or square. footage of non - residential use and all requested code deviations; e.g. reduction in required number of parkinq spaces, specific use, etc.) Facility (300 public and 82 See Attachment A Page 1 of 8 0 • DOES THIS APPLICATION INVOLVE THE TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS (TDR), A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED PLANNED UNI DEVELOPMENT, OR A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED (CERTIFIED) SITE PLAN? YES X NO _ (if yes, attach a copy of the applicable documents) Previously Approved Development Order Located in Attachment E X-SUBMITA ROOF OF OWNERSHIP: (Code Section 4- 202.A.5) COPY OF THE TITLE INSURANCE POLICY, DEED TO THE PROPERTY OR SIGN AFFIDAVIT ATTESTING O ERSHIP (see page 7) NOTE: Warranty deeds for all properties included in the submittal are attached with this submittal: D. , WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 3- 913.A) I/ Provide complete responses to the six (6) GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA — Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail: t. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. See Attachment B for Complete Responses to 1 -6 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use. 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts, on adjacent properties. Page 2 of 8 ORIGINAL JUL 16 2007 0 0 DOES THIS APPLICATION INVOLVE THE TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS (TDR), A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED PLANNED UN DEVELOPMENT, OR A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED (CERTIFIED) SITE PLAN? YES X NO _ (if yes, attach a copy of the applicable documents) Previously Approved Development Order Located in Attachment E C. PROOF OF OWNERSHIP: (Code Section 4- 202.A.5) J SUBMIT A COPY OF THE TITLE INSURANCE POLICY, DEED TO THE PROPERTY OR SIGN AFFIDAVIT ATTEST NG OVVNERSH P (see page 7) NOTE: Warranty deeds for all properties included in the submittal are attached with this submittal Ate, D. 1. WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 3- 913.A) Provide complete responses to the six (6) GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA — Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail: The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. See Attachment B for Complete Responses to 1 -6 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use. 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts, on adjacent properties. RIGINAL RECN 6 D Page 2 of 8 JUL 1 6 2007 r; ls,reNNW, Lvw�T'�se - t'IEN 1J • 7 ITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Comprehensive Infll Redevelopment Project Criteria) Provide complete responses to the six (6) COMPREHENSIVE INFILL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT CRITERIA — Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail: 1. The development or redevelopment is otherwise impractical without deviations from the use and/or development standards set forth in this zoning district. See Attachment C for Complete Responses to 1 -6 2. The development or redevelopment will be consistent with the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan, as well as with the general purpose, intent and basic planning objectives of this Code, and with the intent and purpose of this zoning district 3. The development or redevelopment will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of surrounding properties. 4. Adjoining properties will not suffer substantial detriment as a result of the proposed development. 5. The proposed use shall otherwise be permitted by the underlying future land use category, be compatible with adjacent land uses, will not substantially alter the essential use characteristics of the neighborhood; and shall demonstrate compliance with one or more of the following objectives: a. The proposed use is permitted in this zoning district as a minimum standard, flexible standard or flexible development use; b. The proposed use would be a significant economic contributor to the City's economic base by diversifying the local economy or by creating jobs; c. The development proposal accommodates the expansion or redevelopment of an existing economic contributor; d. The proposed use provides for the provision of affordable housing; e. The proposed use provides for development or redevelopment in an area that is characterized by other similar development and where a land use plan amendment and rezoning would result in a spot land use or zoning designation; or f. The proposed use provides for the development of a new and /or preservation of a working waterfront use. 6. Flexibility with regard to use, lot width, required setbacks, height and off- street parking are justified based on demonstrated compliance with all of the following design objectives: a. The proposed development will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of the surrounding properties for uses permitted in this zoning district; b. The proposed development complies with applicable design guidelines adopted by the City; c. The design, scale and intensity of the proposed development supports the established or emerging character of an area; d. In order to form a cohesive, visually interesting and attractive appearance, the proposed development incorporates a substantial number of the following design elements: • Changes in horizontal building planes; • Use of architectural details such as columns, cornices, stringcourses, pilasters, porticos, balconies, railings, awnings, etc.; • Variety in materials, colors and textures; • Distinctive fenestration patterns; ❑ Building stepbacks; and ❑ Distinctive roofs forms. e. The proposed development provides for appropriate buffers, enhanced landscape design and appropriate distances between buildings. .t Page 3 of 8 Rfiansc) JUL 16 2007 PLANK " G -4- r�i ;110*iEIV CITE' OF' C,..00WATER 0 STORMWATER PLAN Manual and 4- 202.A.21) 0 Storm Drainage Design A STORMWATER NARRATIVE MUST BE SUBMITTED WITH ALL APPLICATIONS. All applications that involve addition or modification of impervious surface, including buildings, must include a stormwater plan that demonstrates compliance with the City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteria manual. A reduction in impervious surface area does not qualify as an exemption to this requirement. If a plan is not required, the narrative shall provide an explanation as to why the site is exempt. At a minimum, the STORMWATER PLAN shall include the following; Existing topography extending 50 feet beyond all property lines; Proposed grading including finished floor elevations of all structures; All adjacent streets and municipal storm systems; Proposed stormwater detention /retention area including top of bank, toe of slope and outlet control structure; A narrative describing the proposed stormwater control plan including all calculations and data necessary to demonstrate compliance with the City manual. Proposed stormwater detention /retention area including top of bank, toe of slope and outlet control structure; Signature and seal of Florida Registered Professional Engineer on all plans and calculations. ❑ COPY OF PERMIT INQUIRY LETTER OR SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT (SWFWMD) PERMIT SUBMITTAL ( SWFWMD approval is required prior to issuance of City Building Permit), if applicable "ypt.AODlicable, SWFWMD permit will be acquired prior to City Building Permit ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF STORMWATER PLAN REQUIREMENTS (Applicant must initial one of the following): 14J ° Stormwater plan as noted above is included "See Stormwater Analysis in Attachment G Stormwater plan is not required and explanation narrative is attached. At a minimum, a grading plan and finished floor elevations shall be provided. CAUTION — IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A STORMWATER PLAN AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 562 -4750. F. SUPPLEMENTAL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 4- 202.A) l` _ I, SIGNED AND SEALED SURVEY (including legal description of property) —One original and 14 copies: TREE SURVEY (including existing trees on site and within 25' of the adjacent site, by species. size (DBH 4" or greater), and location; including drip lines and indicating trees to be removed) —please design around the existing trees: 0PA w+tti�'{ .C] TREE INVENTORY; prepared by a "certified arborist", of all trees 4" DBH or greater. reflecting size, cano ..(drip line s)and condition of t�such trees; LOCATION MAP OF THE PROPERTY; Ott ❑ PARKING DEMAND STUDY in conjunction with a request to make deviations to the parking standards (ie. Reduce number of spaces). Prior to the submittal of this application, the methodology of such study shall be approved by the Community Development Coordinator and shall be in accordance with accepted traffic engineering. principles. The findings of the study will be used in determining whether or not eviations to the parking standards are approved; if j4folu rt GRADING PLAN, as applicable: /- • PRELIMINARY PLAT, as required (Note: Building permits will not be issued until evidence of recording a final plat is provided); • COPY OF RECORDED PLAT, as applicable; N/� ORIGNAL RECtIM JUL 1.6 2007 Page 4 of 8 PLANWA V.ZF;4;iRAiPi t�T CITY Cr CILEtOWATER l • G. SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4- 202.A) S PLAN with the following information (not to exceed 24"x 3W): ndex sheet referencing individual sheetsincluded in package; North arrow; Engineering bar scale (minimum state one inch equals 50-feef), and date prepared; All dimensions; yFootprint and.size of all EXISTING buildings and structures �i ootprint and size of all PROPOSED buildings and structures; -All required setbacks; . II existing and proposed points of access; It required sight triangles; Identification of environmentally unique areas, such as watercourses, wetlands, tree masses, and specimen trees, including Aescription and location of understory; ground cover vegetation and wildlife habitats, etc; Location of all public and private easements; Location of all street rights -of way within and adjacent to the siUa; r !Location of existing public and private utilities, including fire hydrants, storm and sanitary sewer lines, manholes and lift stations, gas and water lines; J All parking spaces, driveways, loading areas and vehicular use areas; :Z1 - Depiction by shading or crosshatching of all required parking lot interior landscaped areas; Location of all solid waste containers, recycling or trash handling areas and outside mechanical equipment and all required screening r/ {per Section 3- 201(D)(i) and Index #7011; Location of all landscape material; _ Location of all onsite and offsite storm -water management facilities; _ ocation of all outdoor lighting fixtures: and ocation of all existing and proposed sidewalks. SITE DATA TABLE for existing, required; and proposed development, in written/tabular form: Land area in square feet'and acres: Number of EXISTING dwelling units; 3'Number of PROPOSED dwelling units; Gross floor area devoted to each use; „,��Parking spaces: total number, presented in tabular form with the number of required spaces; Total paved area, including all paved parking spaces & driveways, _ ,expressed in square feet & percentage of the paved vehicular area; Official records book and page numbers of all existing utility -- asement; ✓ Building and structure heights; Impermeable surface ratio (I:S:R ): and �f Floor area ratio (F.A.R.) for all nonresidential uses. V REDUCED COLOR SITE PLAN to scale (8' /: X 11); A A EXISTING REQUIRED PROPOSED 40,546 sf, 0.93 AC 10,000 sf, 0.23 AC 40,546_ sf, 0.93 AC 0 0 0 0 0 0 20,755 sf - Hotel Use N/A 131,323 sf - Parking N/A N/A 382 N/A N/A 27,276 sf (67.2 %) N/A N/A N/A 15-35 ft 35 -100 ft 63'3 " 0.83 0.95 0.86 N/A N/A 3.24 FOR DEVELOPMENTS OVER ONE ACRE, provide the following additional information on site plan: _ One -foot contours or spot elevations on site; Offsite elevations If required to evaluate the proposed stormwater management for the parcel; _ All open space areas; 0 7 �` ` Location of all earth or water retaining walls and earth berms; Lot lines and building lines (dimensioned); Streets and drives (dimensioned); Building and structural setbacks (dimensioned); Structural overhangs; Page 5 of 8 JUL 16 2007 C)Ty Ci' �LEaWATER • • H. LANDSCAPING PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4- 1102.A) i; CAPE PLAN with the following information (not to exceed ::4" x 36 "): 7existing and proposed structures: ames of abutting streets; di-ainage and retention areas including swales, side slopes and bottom elevations; �elineation and dimensions of all required perimeter landscape buffers; �r fight visibility triangles: Z-Pelineation and dimensions.of all.parking •areas including landscaping islands and curbing; Existing trees on -site and immediately adjacent to the site, by species, size and locations, including driplines (as indicated on required tree survey); j'Location, size, and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, indicated by a key relating to the plant schedule: ,Plant schedule with a key (symbol or label) 'indicating the sb :e, description, specifications, quantities, and spacing requirements of all J e 'sting and proposed landscape materials: including botanical and common names; ypical planting ii6 ails for trees, palms. shrubs and ground cover plants including instructions, soil mixes, backfilling, mulching and rotective measures; Interior landscaping areas hatched and /or shaded and labeled and interior landscape coverage, expressing in both square feet and V percentage covered; `Conditions of a previous development approval (e.g. conditions imposed by the Community Development Board); ,,v A V -Irrigation notes. REDUCED COLOR LANDSCAPE PLAN to scale (8' /z X 11); COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM application, as applicable. Landscape associated with the Comprehensive Landscape Program shall exceed minimum Code requirements to offset the areas where minimum Code will not be met. I. BUILDING ELEVATION PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4- 202.A.23) BUILDING ELEVATION DRAWINGS — with the following information; �>�Ail sides of all buildings: t Dimensioned ;. �e` wa —t L 7Colors (provide one full sized set of colored elevations); Materials: "Sight visibility triangles; REDUCED BUILDING ELEVATIONS — same as above to scale on 8 % X 11. J. SIGNAGE: (Division 19. SIGNS / Section 3 -1806) All EXISTING freestanding and attached signs; Provide photographs a d dimensions (area, height, etc:), indicate whether they will be removed" or to. remain. ; � Si rs L It +s+�5�� A(1 r�- ►' s. s b 0 All PROPOSED freestanding and attached signs: Provide details including location. size„ height, colors, materials and drawing; freesta Sig shall inclyde the streej address (numerals) l ] .St.�ii iAwpr�i,3►va 5+1R.1 . y�ri 3w1.i R_ �i111% !►Gle►,g' 1►dA�•i'a•• Comprehensive Sign rogram appli tion, as applicabll (s parat application and fee required). 17 Reduced .Signage proposal (8'/2 X 11) (color), if submitting Comprehensive Sign Program application. Page 6 of 8 to r,n�n• V! A RIE 1 *0 JUL 1.6 2001 LANNN`y�, ", ���.t>�� �qiC►� Kell [ C- rr- LEli-•'�M1�A1ER • K. TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY: (Section 4- 202.A.13 and 4- 801.C) • Include if required by the Traffic Operations Manager or his/her designee or if the proposed development: ■ Will degrade the acceptable level of service for any roadway as adopted in the Comprehensive Plan. • Will generate 100 or more new vehicle directional trips per hour and /or 1000 or more new vehicle trips per day. • Will affect a nearby roadway segment and/or intersection with five (5) reportable accidents within the prior twelve (12) month period or that is on the City's annual list of most hazardous intersections. Trip generation shall be based on the most recent edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineer's (ITE) Trip General Manual. The Traffic Impact Study must be prepared in accordance with a " Scoping Meeting" held with the Traffic Operations Manager and the Planning Department's Development Review Manager or their designee (727 - 562 -4750) Refer to Section 4-801 C of the Community Development Code for exceptions to this requirement. Acknowledgement of traffic impact study requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following): Traffic Impact Study is included. The study must include a summary table of pre- and post - development levels of service for all roadway legs and each turning movement at all intersections identified in the Sccoping Meeting. Traffic Impact Study is not required. CAUTION — IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE EQUIREMENT FOR A TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 562- 4750. L. FIRE FLOW CALCULATIONS/ WATER STUDY: Provide Fire Flow Calculations. Water Study by a FIRE PROTECTION ENGINEER to assure an adequate water supply is available and to determine if any upgrades are required by the developer due to the impact of this project. The water supply must be able to support the needs of any required fire sprinkler, standpipe and /or fire pump. If a fire pump is required the water supply must be able to supply 150% of its rated capacity. Compliance with 7the 4 Florida Fire Prevention Code to include NFPA 13, MFPA 14. NFPA 20, NFPA 291, and MFPA 1142 (Annex H) is required. Acknowledgement of fire flow calculations/water study requirements (Appli nt must initial one of.the foliowin :. Fire Flow Calculations/Water Study is included. —� Fire Flow Calculations/Water Study is not required. J9 ero -- s [% ii ✓s T taw. CAUTION — IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS{{ IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A FIRE FLOW CALCULATIONS/ WATER STUDY AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Fire Prevention Department at (727) 562 -4334. M. SIGNATURE: I, the undersigned, acknowledge that all representations made in this application are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge and authorize City representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application. Signature.of prop rty own representative RE-C*,.:IVVD STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINE o � ` apd„subscribed before me this day of f�C �� A.D. 20 to me and/or by who is t knnwn h:%-q produced as identification. /1 /j My commission Page 7 of 8 JUL 1 6 2007 V-;: �IANX"— '^ %w te, ;Hk �y •, TERESA S. RING MY COMMISSION 4 DD 564413 EXPIRES: June 15 2010 . ..... `' acnded Thru Notary Public undernriters i i N. AFFIDAVIT TO AUTHORIZE AGENT: 1. Provide names of all property owners on deed — Pi RINT full names: 2. That (I.a a are) the owner(s) and record title holder(s) of the following described property (address or genera{ locatioh): 3. That this property constitutes the property for which a request for a: (describe request) 4. That the undersigned (has/have) appointed and ;(does%do) appoint as (his/their) agent(s) to execute any petitions or other documents necessary to affect such petition; 5. That this affidavit has been executed to induce the City of Clearwater, Florida to consider and act on the above described property; 8. That site visits to the property are necessary by City representatives in order to process this application and the owner authorizes City representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application; 7. That (I/we , the undersigned authority, hereby certify that the foregoing is true and correct. Property r er Property Owner Property Owner Property Owner STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS Before me the undersigned, an officer duly commissioned p the laws owe e State of Florida, on this w� day of pC lr /i! personally appears who having been first duly swom eposes:and says that he/she fully understands the contents otthe:af idavit that h she signed. MI S.#DD /J „ 4AY CO viMlSSION fi DD 564413 EXPIRES, Jime t5, 2010 e ,rydC 3azd^dTft Notary Pubeurdarwrtam Nota "bll _ ign&e Notary Seal/Stamp My Commission Expires Page 8 of 8 ORIGIN RCEaND JUL 1 6 2007 PLANX", 3 Q pAi wISNI' CITY CF CLUMMIER • ATTACHMENT INDEX A. Description of Project and Requests B. General Applicability Criteria C. Comprehensive Infill Criteria D. Garage Consultant Report E. Original Developer Agreement F. Property Deeds G. Stormwater Analysis H. Boundary/Topographic/Tree Survey I. Tree Inventory J. Location map K. Reduced (8.5 x 11) Color Site Plan with Landscaping L. Reduced (8.5 x 11) Color Elevations and Architectural Details M. Comprehensive Landscape Criteria N. Parcel Numbers and Addresses O. Surrounding Building Heights P. Fire Flow Calculations Q. Turn Template 0 d MAL RC-alAD JUL 16 2007 (,11y C7 rLEi 1'JAiI R 1�11 E ATTACHMENT A Description of Project and Requests OR *W R� IAD JUL 16 2907 ���' ° CLEjO TER 01 w ATTACHMENT A MARBELLA PARKING GARAGE — PARCEL B DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT & REQUESTS 1. General Project Description The Clearwater Beach Parking Facility (Parking Facility) is a modification to the previously approved Marbella Condominium Project (Case No. FLD200502021). The Marbella project consists of three contiguous parcels referred to in the original approval as Parcels A, B and C. Parcel A was approved for a 92 -unit condominium building on 1.41 acres located between South Gulfview Blvd and Coronado Drive. Parcel B was approved for a 10 -unit condominium on 0.93 acres north of 5th Street between Coronado Drive and Hamden Drive. Parcel C is a 0.03 acres parcel located bay front along Hamden Drive that was to remain undeveloped as part of the Marbella approval. The proposed project is an addition of a project of 102 dwelling units on Parcel A. to the highest parking level deck, is 51.3 NAVD 88). parking garage and lot to the approved The maximum building height, measured i' above the FEMA AE Zone (EL =12.0' The Parking facility will include a total of 377 spaces. A total of 300 spaces will be public and the remaining 77 spaces will be private. The lower level of the parking garage will be accessed by one entry and one exit lane off of 5th Street. The remaining spaces on the upper floors of the parking garage will be accesses through a gated ingress and egress on Hamden Drive. At the City's request, the Developer has contracted with a parking garage consultant to ensure that the design optimizes circulation and efficient use of the available space. Kimley -Horn and Associates was selected as that consultant, and their design report is included in Attachment D of this submittal. 2. Building Height Increase - Parcel B will include a maximum building height of 51.35' from the FEMA line to the highest parking level deck. 3. Setback Reductions - Front (5th Street): 4.4' to south screen wall (With 33.0' to the building and 5.5' to pavement) - Front (Hamden Drive): 12.7' to building 0 ATTACHMENT B General Applicability Criteria 9 ReGNf.41 , EECN D- JUL 16 2007 v deW C!Ty CT -L &�W IER ATTACHMENT B MARBELLA PARKING GARAGE — PARCEL B GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA 1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. RESPONSE: The proposed parking garage will be consistent with other proposed new beach front development scale, bulk and coverage. The proposed parking garage will be consistent with other existing structure heights such as the condominium building on the southeast corner of 5th Street and Hamden Drive and consistent with other proposed new development scale, density and character of surrounding properties. The proposed building height, measured from the highest parking deck, is 51.35' above the FEMA AE Zone (EL =12.0' NAVD 88). The proposed heights above FEMA provide an adequate step -down in building height to maintain view corridors from the beachfront development as demonstrated by a map submitted as part of this application titled "Adjacent Building Heights ". The architectural design is intended to address the scale and bulk by treating the stair and elevator cores as corner anchors articulated with windows, joint patterns, banding and roof forms used in residential buildings. The two -story character of many existing motel buildings and newly built townhouse residences located on Brightwater Drive east of our site is reflected in the treatment at the tower base, middle and top by horizontal mouldings and color variations and by two -story vertical panels to break down the continuous horizontal spandrels of the garage. Various shaped metal lattice panels also reduce the scale and bulk of the building by providing some depth and play of light on the concrete panels, and a cornice band caps the top to add detail to the top of the structure. 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. RESPONSE: The parking garage will be accented architecturally to improve the appearance of the parcel and ensure that the value of adjacent lands will not be impaired due to aesthetics. The parking garage will also enhance economic development of adjacent properties by providing much needed parking spaces in the center of the Beach community. Access to retail stores and restaurants along S. Gulfview Boulevard will be enhanced by allowing residents and visitors to park their car conveniently just one block from stores and the Beach. 0 0 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use. RESPONSE: The parking garage will provide public parking, reducing the amount of illegally parked cars in the immediate area and overflow parking during peak hours. The proposed entrance to the parking garage, as well as all vehicular use areas within the parking garage will be fully signed and striped as per FDOT and City of St. Petersburg standards. This will yield a significant improvement in regards to public safety since the existing conditions include uncontrolled direct parking access from the public rights of way resulting in direct back out of parked cars into travel lanes along 5th Street and Hamden Drive. The major vehicular entrance is on Hamden Drive so as not to exacerbate traffic congeAion along Coronado Drive. This design also promotes safe pedestrian traffic along the new landscaped walkways. 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. RESPONSE: The purpose of the proposed parking garage is to provide public parking. This will reduce the number of cars parked within City right of way and reduce the number of drivers searching for available parking spaces. Existing conditions include uncontrolled direct parking access from the public rights of way. Under these conditions traffic flow must yield to cars backing out of existing parking spaces. The proposed parking garage will provided controlled access points to City right of way, thus minimizing traffic congestion and creating a more efficient transportation system within the immediate area. The intent of providing entry and exit on Hamden Drive is to allow the major vehicular circulation to the garage from Coronado Drive, then along 5th Street to the entry on Hamden Drive. This circulation pattern will minimize congestion along Coronado Drive. The two entrance drives provide 40' of queuing to reduce congestion on Hamden Drive. 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. RESPONSE: The project has been designed to meet Beach by Design's criteria. The surface parking area is separated from public rights of way by a 30" high decorative wall to also conform with sight visibility triangles. The elevations which abut three public roads are designed to add residential scale and detail to reduce the image of a garage so it is less apparent along the public ways. C] • Finish materials and colors will reflect coastal vernacular themes. Sidewalks will provide details and landscaping to complement the new Coronado Drive public ways. The character of the project will far exceed existing parking structure designs in the City of Clearwater and in Clearwater Beach. 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts, on adjacent properties. RESPONSE: In regards to visual effects, the plan will include code compliant landscaping in an area currently void of such, and be architecturally designed per beach by design standards. The proposed project will not have retail or restaurant operations that may have adverse noise and /or olfactory issues. As confirmed by Tracy Bruch of the City of Clearwater on 07- 31 -07, the City plans to operate the garage 24 hours per day, 7 days per week with the Pay -on -Foot system and limited staffing for security purposes such as special events. The privately owned and maintained portions of the parking garage will not have official "hours of operation ", and will be utilized by private owners as needed. ATTACHMENT C MARBELLA PARKING GARAGE — PARCEL B COMPREHENSIVE INFILL CRITERIA 1. The development or redevelopment is otherwise impractical without deviations from the use and/or development standards set forth in this zoning district. RESPONSE: The proposed development site fronts three streets with three front setbacks, which presents a hardship that has resulted in the requested setback waivers. Interior parking garage design was dictated by the requirement to provide safe and appropriate traffic circulation, adequate queuing distance from adjacent roadways, safe ramp elevation transitions and required parking space and drive isle dimensions. As a result, the exterior building dimensions extend beyond what would fit within the required 15' setbacks associated with Parcel B. Architectural elements projecting a total of 2' -0" from the building face along the east and west elevations reduce the Hamden Drive setback to 13' -0 ". These projections provide details at the entrance lobby, stair cores and along spandrels creating depth and shadows along the length of the building and at the corners. This is intended to interrupt the continuous planes of the structure as noted in Beach By Design objectives. Requested setback deviations along 5th Street are limited to the screen wall and parking lot pavement only. The building setback along 5th Street is 33'0" more than double the required 15' setback. The proposed number of parking spaces, of which the city will utilize 80 %, would be unattainable without the proposed number of floors and associated deviation in maximum height. 2. The development or redevelopment will be consistent with the goals and policies of the comprehensive plan, as well as with the general purpose, intent and basic planning objectives of this Code, and with the intent and purpose of this zoning district. RESPONSE: The Parking Facility is a permitted use within the Tourist District of the City of Clearwater. The proposed Parking Facility is consistent with the goals and objectives of both the Comprehensive Plan and the Beach by Design Guidelines as it promotes economic development, community revitalization, improved public rights of way and increased public safety The proposed Parking Facility supports expansion of economic development and community revitalization by accommodating a growing public need for parking within the City's regional activity center where existing public parking is either non- existent or non - conforming. 0 0 The proposed Parking Facility improves Public rights of way by providing sidewalk, curb and gutter improvements along the property frontage on 5th Street and Hamden Drive. The proposed Parking Facility increases public safety as it promotes traffic calming within the heavily congested tourist areas by providing off street parking with controlled access points to City right of way, thus minimizing traffic congestion and creating a more efficient transportation system within the immediate area. 3. The development or redevelopment will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of surrounding properties. RESPONSE: Sidewalk, curb and gutter improvements will be provided and tie into the newly constructed improvements along Coronado Drive, thus continuing the orderly improvement of the adjacent right of way and providing common pedestrian and transportation infrastructure for adjacent development. Also, The parking garage will be accented architecturally to improve the appearance of the parcel and ensure that the value of adjacent lands will not be impaired due to aesthetics. The parking garage will also enhance economic development of adjacent properties by providing much needed parking spaces in the center of the Beach community. Access to retail stores and restaurants along S. Gulfview Boulevard will be enhanced by allowing residents and visitors to park their car conveniently just one block from stores and the Beach. 4. Adjoining Properties will not suffer substantial detriment as a result of the proposed development. RESPONSE: The proposed Parking Facility will be accented architecturally to improve the appearance of the parcel and ensure that the value of adjacent lands will not be impaired due to aesthetics. The parking garage will enhance economic development of adjacent properties by providing much needed parking in an area where existing parking is limited. 5. The proposed use shall otherwise be permitted by the future land use category, be compatible with adjacent land uses, will not substantially alter the essential use characteristics of the neighborhood; and shall demonstrate compliant with one or more of the following objectives. a. The proposed Use is permitted in this zoning district as a minimum standards, flexible standard or flexible development use; b. The proposed use would be a significant economic contributor to the City's economic base by diversifying the local economy or by creating jobs; c. The development proposal accommodates the expansion or redevelopment of an existing economic contributor; d. The proposed use provides for the provisions of affordable housing; e. The proposed use provides for development or redevelopment in an area that is characterized by other similar development and where a land use plan amendment and rezoning would result in a spot land use or zoning designation; or L The proposed use provides for the development of a new and/or preservation of a working waterfront use. RESPONSE: The proposed Parking Facility is permitted within the Tourist Zoning District. The proposed use will provide much need parking required for future expansion, redevelopment and /or new development of economic contributors to the City's economic base. The proposed Parking Facility will provide support for adjacent commercial land uses, thus helping to preserve the essential use characteristics of the neighborhood. 6. Flexibility with regard to use, lot width, required setbacks, height and off - street parking are justified based on demonstrated compliance with all of the following design objectives: a. The proposed development will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of the surrounding properties for uses permitted in this zoning district; b. The proposed development complies with applicable design guidelines adopted by the City; c. The design, scale and intensity of the proposed development supports the established or emerging character of the area; d. In order to form a cohesive, visually interesting and attractive appearance, the proposed development incorporates a substantial number of the [architectural] design elements; e. The proposed development provides for appropriate buffers, enhanced landscape design and appropriate distances between buildings. RESPONSE: Normal and orderly development of the surrounding properties for tourist use will be enhanced by the proposed development as the appearance and functionality of the immediate area will be improved. New pedestrian sidewalks and handicap ramps will also be provided and tie into the newly constructed improvements along Coronado Drive, thus continuing the orderly development improvements to support tourist uses. The proposed development complies with all applicable design guidelines adopted by the city as demonstrated throughout this application and the associated site and architectural plans. The architectural design is intended to address the scale and bulk by treating the stair and elevator cores as corner anchors articulated with windows, joint patterns, banding and roof forms used in residential buildings. The two -story character of many existing motel buildings and newly built townhouse residences located on Brightwater Drive east of our site and is reflected in the treatment at the tower base, middle and top by horizontal mouldings and color variations and by two -story vertical panels to break down the continuous horizontal spandrels of the garage. Various shaped metal lattice panels also reduce the scale and bulk of the building by providing some depth and play of light on the concrete panels, and a cornice band caps the top to add detail to the top of the structure. Appropriate landscape buffers and setbacks are provided as part of the proposed development. Landscaping will be provided along the north east, and west property lines as per City Code. An appropriate screen wall is proposed along the south property boundary where a 4'4" setback is requested by variance. It should be noted that the setback variance along the south property line is for parking and a screening wall only. The southern most face of the building is setback 33'0 from the right of way line, more than double the required 15' setback. i ATTACHMENT D Garage Consultant Report 0 UZI *MAC fit! dD. JUL 16 2007 PL P �Nx CIIY, 0e CtE'���EM� • ❑Kimley -Horn and Associates, Inc. May 31, 2007 Mr. Robert A. Cala, AIA GMA Design Group, Inc. 15500 Lightwave Drive, Suite 106 Clearwater, Florida 33760 i suite 2125 205 West Wacker Drive Chicago, Illinois 60606 Re: Parking Consulting for Clearwater Beach Parking Structure Clearwater, Florida Dear Mr. Cala: Kimley -Hom and Associates, Inc., (KHA) has been pleased to provide the GMA Design Group with our professional parking services for the proposed 382 -space Clearwater Beach parking facility and lot at Coronado Drive and Fifth Street near Clearwater Beach in the City of Clearwater, Florida. GMA Design Group is preparing a proposal for a design -build parking structure with a local developer, The Murray Company. As part of that process, KHA reviewed alternative func- tional design schemes prepared by GMA Design Group and attended a meeting in Clearwater with representatives of the City of Clearwater, GMA Design Group, The Murray Company, and Tim Haas (the City's parking consultant). Following that meeting, modifications were made to the design scheme to incor- porate the comments made at the meeting, as well as additional input and review by KHA. GMA Design Group initially prepared two garage schemes for the site. Follow- ing a review of the two schemes, an initial concept was developed for the site prior to review by the City of Clearwater. That concept included a two -way single - thread helix design, with entry and exit from Hamden Drive, with the primary pedestrian exit located on Coronado Drive, but elevated five feet above street level because of the garage slope. This is the concept that was reviewed at the meeting with the City of Clearwater on Tuesday, April 10, 2007, in Clear- water. At that meeting, several comments were made about the scheme, includ- ing the following: • Garage access will be pay -on -foot. No cashier booth is required. • Two pay- foot - stations will be required at the elevator lobby. 0RI *i" AL RE --U END TEL 312 726 9445 FAX 312 726 9449 JUIL 16 2007 SCI ICI ()T CLE;r.MIWER 9 • Kimley -Horn and Associates, Inc. Clearwater Beach Parking Facility Functional Garage Plan The proposed garage will be located on a site in Clearwater, Florida, near Clear- water Beach on Fifth Street between Coronado Drive and Hamden Drive. The park- ing garage structure will consist of two parking bays with a single- thread helix configuration for two -way internal circulation. The garage will have six levels with a total of 371 parking stalls, plus an additional 1 I surface spaces outside the garage on Fifth Street, for a total site capacity of 382 spaces. Accessible parking will be provided to meet the requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). Access between the ground level and the first parking level will be by way of an internal ramp without parking at a slope of about 11 percent. Access between floors will be achieved using parking ramps with a maximum slope of about 5.25 percent. Access to the garage's upper levels (332 spaces) will be from Hamden Drive. Garage access will be controlled by gates and ticket dispensers. At this time, it is anticipated that the access control equipment will include a pay -on -foot system, which will reduce the personnel requirements that would be required with a pay -on- exit system with cashier booths at the exits. Eliminating the exit cashiers will also increase the capacity of the exit lanes and the number of vehicles that can be pro- cessed in an hour. Currently, the garage is planned to have one entry lane, one exit lane, and one reversible lane that can be used as an entry or exitlane, depending on the requirements at any given time. The lower level of the garage and the surface lot will be available for private park- ing by the garage developer, and it will be accessible with one entry lane and one exit lane on Fifth Street. A total of 50 spaces will be available in the private section of the garage. Pedestrian access to and from the garage will be provided with a stair and elevator on Coronado Drive to provide access to Clearwater Beach. A second stair will be located on Hamden Drive to meet the pedestrian exit requirements for the garage. The parking garage configuration is appropriate for the site. The site has several limitations, including a relatively short dimension (190 feet) in the direction of garage travel. That short dimension limits the garage efficiency somewhat, since the parking ramps are shortened as a result and the overall garage efficiency as well, compared with a garage with longer ramps. Also, the garage includes a ramp from ground level to the second level that does not have any parking on it to provide suf- ficient clearance for the stair and elevator located on Coronado. That ramp is too steep to allow parking, but it is an important element in the garage functional plan and the pedestrian circulation plan. The garage has an overall efficiency of 370 square feet per parking space, which is reasonable given the site constraints and the requirement to orient the garage's pedestrian access toward Clearwater Beach. T 9 R, R GIN �, RE-i> -IM JILL 16 2007 CLEiOoMl ER ATTACHMENT E Original Developer Agreement t;��I Qlaniqu JUL 16 2007 PL ANM -r-v G :F *: V,E %17 Cl N O?° C1U�6WIER July 21, 2005 Mr. Keith Zayac Keith Zayac and Associates, Inc. 701 Enterprise Road, Suite 404 Safety Harbor, FL 34695 RE: Development Order - FLD2005 -02021 / TDR2005 -03020 - 325 South Gulfview Boulevard Dear Mr. Zayac: This letter constitutes a Development Order pursuant to Section 4- 206.D.6 of the Community Development Code. On July 19, 2005, the Community Development Board (CDB) reviewed your Flexible Development application to permit attached dwellings in the Tourist (T) District with an increase in height from 30' to 148' for Parcel "A" (as measured from base flood elevation to the roof deck); an increase in height of a parapet wall from 30" to seven feet (7') for Parcel "B "; to permit a building within the required sight visibility triangle along Coronado Drive and 5`" Street; and an increase in height from 30' to 64' for Parcel `B" (as measured from base flood elevation to the roof deck) as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project under the provisions of Section 2- 803.C.; a Termination of the status of a nonconformity (equivalent of 119 hotel units [116 hotel units and three dwelling units] where 93 hotel units are permitted) within the Tourist (T) District under the provisions of Section 6- 109.C; Preliminary Plat; and a Transfer of Development Rights (TDR2005- 03020) of 18 hotel units from 401 Coronado /406 Hamden Drives (donor site) to 325 South Gulfview Boulevard (receiver site — Parcels A, B and C) under the provisions of Sections 4 -1402 and 4 -1403. The Community Development Board (CDB) APPROVED the application with the following bases and conditions: Bases for Approval: I. The proposal complies with the Flexible Development criteria as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project per Section 2- 804.C. 2. The proposal complies with the Flexible Development criteria for a Transfer of Development Rights per Section 4 -1402; 3. The proposal complies with the Flexible Development criteria for a Transfer of Development Rights per Section 4 -1403; 4. The proposal complies with the Termination of Status as a Non - conformity per Section 6- 109.C. 5. The proposal is in compliance with other standards in the Code including the General Applicability Criteria per Section 3 -913; 6. The proposal is in compliance with the requirements of Beach by Design. 7. The development is compatible with the surrounding area and will enhance other redevelopment efforts. OZIGNWI RIEC ! ffl- D JUL 16 2007 9 Y CT CLU4:�i�AIER Conditions of Approval: 1. That evidence of filing of a final plat with Pinellas County be submitted to Staff prior to the issuance of any building permits; 2. That all building permits are applied for within two years (June 21, 2007) of CDB approval and that all certificates of occupancy are applied for within two years to receipt of the first building permit; 3. That a sidewalks which matches the City's Beach Walk plan with regard to materials be installed per City standards and specifications; 4. That the final design and color of the building be consistent with the conceptual elevations submitted to (or as modified by) the CDB, and be approved by Staff; 5. That all signage meet the requirements of Code and be limited to signs attached directly to the building and be architecturally - integrated with the design of the building with regard to proportion, color, material and finish as part of a final Comprehensive Sign Program package (as required) submitted to and approved by Staff prior to the issuance of any sign permits which includes that: a. All signs be designed as part of an overall theme that respect, enhance and contribute to the architectural style, detailing and elements of a building; b. All signs consist of design, colors, materials, size, shape and methods of illumination which reinforce the overall design of the fagade; c. All attached signs are installed so the method of installation is concealed or made an integral part of the design of the sign; d. All wall signs be located on flat, unadorned parts of a fagade such as the horizontal band between the storefront and second floor or on windows, awning flaps, fascia, etc.; and e. The letter size, letter and word spacing, font style and other design elements of all signs create an overall high quality aesthetic appearance. 6. That all proposed utilities (from the right -of -way to the proposed building) be placed underground. Conduits for the future undergrounding of existing utilities within the abutting right(s) -of -way shall be installed along the entire site's street frontages prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. The applicant's representative shall coordinate the size and number of conduits with all affected utility providers (electric, phone, cable, etc.), with the exact location, size and number of conduits to be approved by the applicant's engineer and the City's Engineering Department prior to the commencement of work; 7. That revised plans be submitted which accurately depict all required erosion and sediment control techniques; 8. That all utility equipment including but not limited to wireless communication facilities, electrical and water meters, etc. be screened from view and/or painted to match the building to which they are attached, as applicable prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy; 9. That all Traffic Impact fees be paid prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy; 10. That Open Space and Recreation Impact fees be paid prior to the issuance of buildings permits or final plat (as applicable); 11. That a Tree Preservation Plan be submitted to and approved by Staff prior to the issuance of any building permits; 12. That the "Tree Removal" calculations be revised to reflect that palms are replaced at one inch per palm if they are greater than 10' of clear trunk; 13. That the arborists field notes are transferred in "typeset" on the Tree Inventory Plan and submitted to and approved by Staff prior to the issuance of any building permits; 14. That a revised site plan be submitted to and approved by Staff prior to the issuance of any building permits which provides traffic control devices for vehicles approaching the tops and bottoms of garage ramps at 90- degree angles and that shows all drive aisles at a minimum of 24 -feet in width; and 15. That a special warranty deed, specifying the number of dwelling units being conveyed or sold from 401 Coronado and 406 Hamden Drives and being transferred to 325 South Gulfview Boulevard, be recorded with a notarized copy submitted to Staff prior to the issuance of any building permits for this project. The special warranty deed shall also contain a covenant restricting in perpetuity the use of all platted lots_a, ,4,00,l RECt. PD JUL 16 2007 CRY OFF CLUMMER Coronado and 406 Hamden Drives due to the transfer of development rights. Any mortgage holder of the sending site (401 Coronado and 406 Hamden Drives) shall consent to the transfer of development rights prior to the issuance of any permits. Pursuant to Section 4 -407, an application for a building permit shall be made within one (1) year of Flexible Development approval (by July 19, 2006). All required certificates of occupancy shall be obtained within two (2) years of the date of issuance of the building permit. Please be advised that time frames do not change with successive owners. The Community Development Coordinator may grant an extension of time for a period not to exceed one (1) year and only within the original period of validity. The CDB may approve one (1) additional extension of time after the Community Development Coordinator's extension to initiate a building permit application. The issuance of this Development Order does not relieve you of the necessity to obtain any building permits or pay any impact fees that may be required. In order to facilitate the issuance of any permit or license affected by this approval, please bring a copy of this letter with you when applying for any permits or licenses that require this prior development approval. Additionally, an appeal of a Level Two approval (Flexible Development) may be initiated pursuant to Section 4- 502.B. by the applicant or by any person granted party status within 14 days of the date of the CDB decision. The filing of an application/notice of appeal shall stay the effect of the decision pending the final determination of the case. The appeal period for your case expires on August 2, 2005 (14 days from the date of the CDB decision). Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact Robert G. Tefft, Planner III at (727) 562 -4539 or via e-mail at robert.tefft (a)myclearwater.com. Sincerely, Michael Delk, AICP Planning Director Ra , , RED AND JUL 16 2 @07 PF.A6 % *r-- rX-7AP `,;r::Nf 7 CIS 0- C;-U4 vX-ER 0 ATTACHMENT F Property Deeds M. . U RE-aw,D; JUIL 16 2007 d JrF�,�: -ty KEN BURKE, CLERK OF COURT PINELLAS COUNTY FLORIDA INST# 2005306825 0810472005 at 02:24 PM OFF REC BK: 14505 PG: 995 -999 DpcType:DEED RECORDING: $14.00 D DOC STAMP: $23800.00 THIS INSTRUMENT PREPARED BY AND RETURN TO: TROY J. PERDUE, ESQ. JOHNSON, POPE,BOKOR, RUPPEL & BURNS, LLP POST OFFICE BOX 1368 CLEARWATER, FL 33757 -1368 STATUTORY WARRANTY DEED THIS INDENTURE, is made on AL &MST ,2005, between THOMAS J. WILK AND STASIA WILK, husband and wife, whose post office address is 451 Harbor Drive S., Indian Rocks Beach, FL 33785 ( "Grantor"), and LUCCA DEVELOPMENT, LLC, a Florida limited liability company, whose post office address is 9011 South Natoma Avenue, Oak Lawn, IL 60453 ( "Grantee "). WITNESSETH: Grantor, for and in consideration of Ten Dollars ($10.00) and other good and valuable consideration to Grantor in hand paid by Grantee, -the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, has granted, bargained and sold to Grantee, and Grantee's heirs, successors and assigns forever, the following described land, situated in Pinellas County, Florida: JAIL 16 2007 �1 �T Cl:E 1WER PARCEL ONE: Lots 10 and 10 -A of COLUMBIA SUBIDVISION NO. 3, according to the map or plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 27, Page 46 of the Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida. PARCEL TWO: Lots 13 and 14 in Block A of COLUMBIA SUBDIVISION NO. 2, according to the map or plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 21, Page 79 of the Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida. SUBJECT to applicable land use and zoning restrictions and to easements, reservations and restrictions of record, if any, which are specifically not reimposed or extended hereby, and to taxes for the year 2005 and subsequent years. Grantor does hereby fully warrant the title to said land and will defend the same against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever. The tax parcel numbers for the aforedescribed property are: 08/29/15/17604/000/0100 08/29/151175861001/0140 08/29/15/17586/001/0130 0KI 71NW1 KlEct-AW, D JUL 1.6 2007 cl-ly IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Grantor has hereunto set Grantor's hand and seal the day and year first above written. Signed, sealed and delivered in the presence of: Print na e: r► Moeh it Print name: �,— t'�tG� CQ•t(!`tI) Vi. Print na e: oh � (Print name:t'�([ 3 By: Thomas J. Wilk By: Stasia Wilk wvt�- 9 `F" 'l RECD i iED JUL I d 2007 STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF PINELLAS ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 154- day of 2005, by Thomas J. Wilk and Stasia Wilk, who are personally known to me o Rp oduced _ d1' P4 �iceV1SCS r� I -_ as identification. —Y Gr- aOt j%. GINA L CANOP.Aki G#- 7_ MYCON1MlSSIONa OD*170 Notary Public//,�',,M �@ k:'(PIRFS: Iani�ary ?6. :L`tX• Printname (7!� L • L'�Opa,�r t:�pir,,pinav ol. u4:Jm: $eY4'I®�- �'•'"Q" �„ -�-- -- - My commission expires: t —dca —o b 45605.109046 #351570 v1 - LuccalWiik deed R9GAN11 RE( MAD 4 JUL 16 2007 Ofd OTT CkE�'?��'•rANER E August 1,2005 The undersigned owners of that certain Boat Slip No. l 4--Ad _, located at 347 — 353 Coronado and 350 Hamden, Clearwater, FL 33767 do herebv transfer ownership of said boat slip to Lucca Development, LLC. This transfer is part of a sales agreement for that property located at 347 — 353 Coronado and 350 Hamden, Clearwater, FL 33767 and no additional consideration is being provided. v VW-^ l Thomas J. Wilk Stasia Wilk JUL 16 2007 CIS 0 T CLUMVWER • This instrument was prepared by and Return to: THOMAS 0. MICHAELS, P.A. 1370 Pinehurst Road Dunedin, Florida 34698 WARRANTY DEED Parcel ID No. 08/29/ 15/ 17586/001 /0120 • KEN BURKE, CLERK OF COURT PINELLAS COUNTY FLORIDA INST# 2005023040 01/20/2005 at 09.38 AM OFF REC BK: 14072 PG: 186487 DocType :DEED RECORDING: $18.50 D DOC STAMP: $3325.00 THIS WARRANTY DEED, is made and entered to be effective the 1_ day of January, A.D. 2005, by JAMES SOFRONAS, a married man, herein called the Grantor, to LUCCA DEVELOPMENT, LLC, a Florida Limited Liability Company, whose post office address is 521 Mandalay, Unit 1008, Clearwater, FL 33767, hereinafter called the Grantee: (Whereverused herein the terms "Grantor" and "Grantee" include the plural and the singular, the parties to this instrument and the heirs, legal representatives and assigns of individuals, and the successors, and assigns of corporations) WITNESSETH: That the Grantor, for and in consideration of the sum of $475,000.00, the receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, hereby grants, bargains, sells, aliens, remises, releases, conveys and confirms unto the Grantee all that certain land situated in PINELLAS COUNTY, State of Florida, to wit: Lot 12, Block A, COLUMBIA SUB. NO. 2, according to the map or plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 21, Page 79, of the Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida. Subject to the covenants, restrictions, reservations, easements of record, and taxes for the year 2005 and subsequent years. Said property is not the homestead of the Grantor(s) or Grantor(s) immediate family under the Laws and Constitution of the State of Florida. TOGETHER, with all the tenements, hereditaments and appurtenances thereto belonging or in anywise appertaining. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD, the same in fee simple forever. AND, the Grantor hereby covenants with said Grantee that the Grantor is lawfully seized of said land in fee simple; that the Grantor has good right and lawful authority RECIETFED JUL 16 2007 CITY OT CLEf?'ZIWATER to sell and convey said land, and hereby warrant the title to said land and will defend the same against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever; and that said land is free of all encumbrances, except taxes accruing subsequent to December 31, 2004. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I, JAMES SOFRONAS, a married man, Grantor, have signed and sealed this Warranty Deed to be effective the day and date as first above written. Signed, sealed and delivered in our presence: Witness 1 - Sign 0. 1/tt C cEft�� S Witness 1 - Print, it ess 2 - ign M e, a IMi:Lk Witness 2 - Print STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF PINELLAS MES SOFRONAS �31 Giilfview Blvd. leamater, FL 337 7 The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of Januarv. 2005 by JAMES SOFRONAS, a married man, who has produced nn 8 d 11ki k 46t o M as identification, who did take an oath and acknowledged to and before me that he executed the foregoing instrument for the purposes therein expressed. NOTARY PUBLIC: Sign: ,Print: Notary Public / State of F orida My commission Expires: (Seal, if applicable) TERESAA.M.ORAKE MY COMMISSION # DD 306M EXPIRES! June 2S. 2008 i-80 N3-NOTARY R. NMM C43=0 Mt00. 00. JUL 16 2007 CITY 07, CF Ua 'rNV ER General Warranty Deed Made this May 13,2005 A.D. By US EURO TRADE, INC., A FLORIDA CORPORATION, whose address is: 346 HAMDEN DRIVE. Cleanvater, Florida 33755, hereinafter called the grantor, to LUCCA DEVELOPMENT, LLC, A FLORIDA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, whose post office address is: 521 MANDALAY AVE. #1008, CLEARWATER BEACH, FL 33767, hereinaftercalled the grantee: (Whenever used herein the term "grantor" and "grantee" include all the parties to this instrument and the heirs, legal representatives and assigns o f individuals, and the successors and assigns of corporations) Witnesseth, that the grantor, for and in consideration of the sum of Ten Dollars, (S 10.00) and other valuable considerations, receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, hereby grants, bargains, sells, aliens, remises, releases, conveys and confirms unto the grantee, all that certain land situate in Pinellas County, Florida, viz:y Lots 8, 9, and 9 -A of COLUMBIA SUBDIVISION NO. 3. according to the Plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 27, Page(s) 46, of the Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida. Parcel ID Number: 08129115117604100010080 Together with all the tenements, hereditaments and appurtenances thereto belongingor in anywise appertaining. TO Have and to Hold, the same in fee simple forever. And the grantor hereby covenants with said grantee that the grantor is lawfully seized of said land in fee simple; that the grantor has good right and lawful authority to sell and convey said land; that the grantor hereby fully warrants the title to said land and will defend the same against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever; and that said land is free of all encumbrances except taxes accruing subsequentto December 31,2004. In Witness Whereof, the said grantor has signed and sealed these Signed, sealed and delivered in our presence: Witness Printed i`ame,— �:l�L -t" r US F.URO the day and year first above written. INC. Thomas arasch Its: Pre ident Address: 346 HAMDEN DRIVE, Cleanvater, Florida 33755 n �tareare `)( rasch witness Printed \amp �t/! !f% %t fr` -!� _i 6A, 11 i� Address: 3-06—HAMDEN DRIVE. CLEARWATER, FL 33755 State of Florida County of Pinellas (Seal). The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 13th day of May, 2005, by THOMAS KARASCH AND MARG.ARETE KARASCH, who is /are personallyknown to me or who has produced drivers lice as idenuf}y tign, y 'x}71 c :Ui 9 Notary Public r7 r i Priat'Name: Gina Boivin �iy Commissbn Expires. Commission t1DD217338 Fsoires: May 29,2007 { ,mdcd Thm ••�` Atlantic ,< "; Co. Inc. DEED Individual Warranty Deed • Legal on Face Closers" Choice k ����3 JUL 16 2007 CITY OTT CLUJ VATI ER Prepared by: Gina Havens Title Clearinghouse 423 Mandalay Avenue KEN BURKE, CLERK OF COURT Cleanvater Beach, Florida 33767 PINl1LAS COUNTY FLORIDA INST# 2005203719 05/26/2005 at 11:23 AM r. File Number'. OFF REC BK: 14339 PG: 1686 -1686 DoeType: DEEDRECORDING: $70.00 D DOC STAMP: $12600.00 General Warranty Deed Made this May 13,2005 A.D. By US EURO TRADE, INC., A FLORIDA CORPORATION, whose address is: 346 HAMDEN DRIVE. Cleanvater, Florida 33755, hereinafter called the grantor, to LUCCA DEVELOPMENT, LLC, A FLORIDA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, whose post office address is: 521 MANDALAY AVE. #1008, CLEARWATER BEACH, FL 33767, hereinaftercalled the grantee: (Whenever used herein the term "grantor" and "grantee" include all the parties to this instrument and the heirs, legal representatives and assigns o f individuals, and the successors and assigns of corporations) Witnesseth, that the grantor, for and in consideration of the sum of Ten Dollars, (S 10.00) and other valuable considerations, receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, hereby grants, bargains, sells, aliens, remises, releases, conveys and confirms unto the grantee, all that certain land situate in Pinellas County, Florida, viz:y Lots 8, 9, and 9 -A of COLUMBIA SUBDIVISION NO. 3. according to the Plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 27, Page(s) 46, of the Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida. Parcel ID Number: 08129115117604100010080 Together with all the tenements, hereditaments and appurtenances thereto belongingor in anywise appertaining. TO Have and to Hold, the same in fee simple forever. And the grantor hereby covenants with said grantee that the grantor is lawfully seized of said land in fee simple; that the grantor has good right and lawful authority to sell and convey said land; that the grantor hereby fully warrants the title to said land and will defend the same against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever; and that said land is free of all encumbrances except taxes accruing subsequentto December 31,2004. In Witness Whereof, the said grantor has signed and sealed these Signed, sealed and delivered in our presence: Witness Printed i`ame,— �:l�L -t" r US F.URO the day and year first above written. INC. Thomas arasch Its: Pre ident Address: 346 HAMDEN DRIVE, Cleanvater, Florida 33755 n �tareare `)( rasch witness Printed \amp �t/! !f% %t fr` -!� _i 6A, 11 i� Address: 3-06—HAMDEN DRIVE. CLEARWATER, FL 33755 State of Florida County of Pinellas (Seal). The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 13th day of May, 2005, by THOMAS KARASCH AND MARG.ARETE KARASCH, who is /are personallyknown to me or who has produced drivers lice as idenuf}y tign, y 'x}71 c :Ui 9 Notary Public r7 r i Priat'Name: Gina Boivin �iy Commissbn Expires. Commission t1DD217338 Fsoires: May 29,2007 { ,mdcd Thm ••�` Atlantic ,< "; Co. Inc. DEED Individual Warranty Deed • Legal on Face Closers" Choice k ����3 JUL 16 2007 CITY OTT CLUJ VATI ER 0 • ATTACHMENT G Stormwater Analysis Oko'GIINU RECIUM TUL 1.6 2007 0- CLE;�-,NVKIER 0 • DRAINAGE ANALYSIS FOR MARBELLA PARKING GARAGE PARCEL B CITY OF CLEARWATER SEC 08 / TWP 29 / RGE 15 SUBMITTED BY THE MURRAY COMPANY PREPARED BY WATER RESOURCE ASSOCIATES, INC. 4260 WEST LINEBAUGH AVENUE TAMPA, FLORIDA 33624 JUNE 2007 Kim HUD ji'L 1.6 2007 dark D. Farrell, P.E. rida P.E. No. 34448 ��SOIIfCQ l(wv -9 DRAINAGE ANALYSIS FOR MARBELLA PARKING GARAGE General Overview and Methodolo�y The proposed Marbella Parking Garage (Project) includes the development of a 6- story, 371 -space parking garage with an external l l -space parking lot on 0.93 acres of land located on the north side of 5t" Street between Coronado Drive and Hamden Drive in Clearwater, Florida. The proposed stormwater management system includes a 7,000 SF +/- dry detention pond with an outfall connection into an existing City curb inlet on the northwest corner of 5`" Street and Hamden Drive. The proposed pond accommodates storage for water quality treatment (3/4" due to proximity to waterfront) and water quantity attenuation of a 25- year storm event. The minimum 0.5' freeboard requirement is met. Because the Project site is less than 10 acres the Rational Method has been used to calculate peak runoff rates and storage requirements. Existing conditions include nearly 100% impervious coverage of small hotel structures. Therefore a weighted runoff coefficient of 1/2 the actual proposed development value has been used. The following is a summary of all design calculations demonstrating that the proposed stormwater management system meet all requirements of the City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteria. Water Ouality Treatment Volume Calculations As per City of Clearwater Engineering Staff direction, the water quality treatment depth has been increased from ''/2" for a dry retention pond to '/4" due to close proximity to the waterfront. See calculation below: V = (3/4 ") x Project Area = (0.75/12) x (0.93ac. x 43,560) = 2,531 cf The proposed weir overflow will be set to elevation 3.88' to accommodate the water quality treatment volume of 2,531 cf based on the pond stage storage calculations attached. Water Ouantitv Attenuation Volume Calculations Attenuation volume is calculated by multiplying the difference between pre and post developed peak runoff by a time of concentration of one (1) hour as per direction from City of Clearwater Engineering Staff. This project pre and post developed runog dill be JUL 16 20107 ! • the same since the runoff coefficient for both conditions will be C = 0.95. However, as per City of Clearwater requirements the pre developed runoff coefficient will be reduced by %2 to yield C = 0.475. See calculation below: AV = ACiA x Tc = (0.475) x (3.75 in/hr) x (0.93 ac) x (1 hr) x (3,600 sec /hr) = 5,940 cf The proposed outfall structure top will be set to elevation 4.38' to accommodate the water quantity attenuation volume of 5,940 cf based on the pond stage storage calculations attached. Outfall Structure Geometry The overflow weir shall has an invert elevation of 3.88' to accommodate water quality treatment and a top elevation equal to the top of the outfall structure at elevation 4.38', to accommodate the attenuation volume. The weir width is sized to restrict post developed discharge to the established pre developed peak discharge rate to the top of the outfall structure, above which overflow is provided for larger volumes as per City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteria.. See Calculations Below. Pre Developed Peak Discharge (Qa): Qp = CiA = (0.475) x (3.75 in /hr) x (0.93 ac) = 1.65 cfs Base on a weighted C of 1/2 the actual value and a Tc of 1 hr. Weir Width (L): L = Q /(Cw x h"') = (1.65 cfs) / [(4.38'- 3.88' )3/2 x 3.2] = 1.46' The proposed overflow weir will be 1.46' from the 3.88' invert elevation to the top of the structure at elevation 4.38' to restrict discharge to the established pre developed peak discharge of 1.65 cfs. Pond Bleed Down As per City of Clearwater Stormwater Design Criteria calculations have been provided to show the proposed detention pond will drain dry in less than 24 hours. Although the pond design high elevation will not reach the top of bank elevation, and the outfall structure will provide much of the draw down, a conservative approach to the bleed down calculation is applied in that the pond is assumed to be full to the top of bank with the only means of bleed down through the pond bottom. Pond bleed down calculations are attached to this drainage narrative, along with supporting infiltration test data or permeability rates and a geotechnical report for depth to the seasonal high water table. OR90G 4 �, P RRM)FID JUL 16 2007 Post - Developed Pond 1 - Hydraulic Summary Available Stage /Storage Table Stage (ft -NGVD) Area (SF) Area (Ac) Depth Interval (ft) Storage (ac -ft) 3.50 6,253 0.144 0.0 0.000 4.00 6,610 0.152 0.5 0.074 5.00 7,374 0.169 1.0 0.234 - I able represents the avaiiaole storage Detween the SHWT and TOB of Pond 1. 5.0 4.8 4.6 4.4 0 4.2 z r 4.0 m 3.8 N 3.6 3.4 3.2 3.0 Stage Storage Curve I r I 0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 0.30 Storage (AF) Storage Vol. Treat. Vol. EL. - - Attenuation Vol. EL. Water Quality Treatment Summary SHWT (ft) 2.00 Treat. Area (ac) 0.93 Treat. Depth (in) 0.75 Treatment Vol (cf) 2,532 Treat. Vol. (ac -ft) 0.06 Treat. EL. (ft) 3.88 < Set weir overflow INV EL. Attenuation Vol (cf) 5,940 Attenuation Vol. (ac -ft) 0.14 Attenuation. EL. (ft) 4.38 < Set top of outfall structure EL. Notes J U'L -1.6 2007 Pp AN e.,1 h-7 P If zi- CI1' C" CLUM�MER DETENTION POND BLEEDOWN ANALYSIS POND VOLUME DATA Start Bleedown 5.00 ft (NAD 88) «Top of Bank End Bleedown 3.50 ft (NAD 88) << Pond Bottom Pond Bottom Area 6,253 sf Volume (V) 7,374 cf «Pond Volume HYDROLOGIC DATA Pond Bottom Permeability (K) 0.67 ft/hr << From DR[ Test Permeability Safety Factor 2 SHWT 2.00 ft (NAD 88) << As per Geotechnical Report Flow Length 1.50 ft << Bottom of Pond to SHWT DRAWDOWN ANALYSIS E h dh V dV i= h/L A Q =KiA Q1 +Q2 /2 dT T Water Surface ELft -NAD 88 ( ) Total Head (ft) Incr. Head (ft) Total Volume (CF) Incr. Volume (CF) Hydraulic Gradient (ft/ft) Filter Area (st) Darcy Flow (cfh ) Avg. Flow (cfh) Time Incr. (hr) Total Time (hr) 5.00 3.00 7,374 2.000 6253.0 4189.5 0.0 0.15 737.40 4084.8 0.18 - 4.85 2.85 6,637 1.900 6253.0 3980.0 0.18 0.15 737.40 3875.3 0.19 4.70 2.70 5,899 1.800 6253.0 3770.6 0.37 0.15 737.40 3665.8 0.20 4.55 2.55 5,162 1.700 6253.0 3561.1 0.57 0.15 737.40 3456.3 0.21 4.40 2.40 4,424 1.600 6253.0 3351.6 0.79 0.15 737.40 3246.9 0.23 4.25 2.25 3,687 1.500 6253.0 3142.1 1.01 0.15 737.40 3037.4 0.24 4.10 2.10 2,950 1.400 6253.0 2932.7 1.26 0.15 737.40 2827.9 0.26 3.95 1.95 2,212 1.300 6253.0 2723.2 1.52 0.15 737.40 2618.4 0.28 3.80 1.80 1,475 1.200 6253.0 2513.7 1.80 0.15 737.40 2409.0 0.31 3.65 1.65 737 1.100 6253.0 2304.2 2.10 0.15 737.40 2199.5 0.34 3.50 1.50 1 1 0 1.000 6253.0 2094.8 2.44 REMAD It IL 16 2007 � ,EN • CJ • DOUBLE RING INFILTR ®METER TEST PROJECT: Marbella Parking Garage - Parcel I3 Inner Ring Diameter 12" Start Time Elaaped Time (min) Volume (gal) Inner Rind Rate (ft /day) 10:10 AM 2 0.4 49.0 10:15 AM 5 0.5 24.5 10:20 AM 5 0.4 19.6 10:25 AM 5 0.5 24.5 10:30 AM 5 0.4 19.6 10:40 AM 10 0.1 2.5 10:50 AM 10 0.5 12.3 11:00 AM 10 0.5 12.3 11:30 AM 30 0.8 6.5 1 2:00 PM 30 1.7 13.9 12:30 PM 30 1.2 9.8 1:00 PM 30 1.4 11.4 1:30 PM 30 1.2 9.8 2:00 PM 30 1.2 9.8 Average 16.11 Start of Infiltration 0 1) The interval between the start and end time signifies the amount of time needed for the water to infiltrate the inner ring a total of 1 inch. 2) The Double Ring Infiltrometer Test was performed by Geologic and Environmental Testing, Inc. and is being certified by Water Resource Associates, 3) An infiltration rate of 16 ft /day was used in the Water Quality MODRET Infiltration Analysis 0 &dGeN -4 16 NA, CIS CW 0 • UNIVERSAL ENGINEERING SCIENCES PRELIMINARY GEOTECHNICAL EXPLORATION Proposed 5 -Story Building NEC 51" Street & Coronado Drive Clearwater Beach, Florida UES Project No. 81045 - 002 -01 Prepared For: Lucca, Inc. 9011 South Natoma Avenue Oak Lawn, Illinois 60453 Prepared By: Universal Engineering Sciences 9802 Palm River Road Tampa, Florida 33619 (813) 740 -8506 EC "01D' JUL 16 2007 Oily 0j- CLEj?- MER February 2, 2006 Consultants in: Geotechnical Engineering • Environmental Sciences • Construction Materials Testing • Threshold Inspection Offices In: Atlanta - Clermont • Daytona Beach • DeBary • Fort Myers • Fort Pierce • Gainesville • Hollywood • Houston • Jacksonville • Ocala • Orlando • Palm Coast • Pensacola • Rockledge • Sarasota • St. Augustine • Tampa • West Palm Beach • ' UNIVERSAL ENGINEERING SCIENCES Consultants in: Geotechnicai Engineering • Environmental Sciences Construction Materials Testing - Threshold Inspection • Private Provider Inspection February 2, 2006 Luke Castrogiovanni Lucca, Inc. 9011 South Natoma Avenue Oak Lawn, Illinois 60453 Reference: Preliminary Geotechnical Exploration Proposed 5 -Story Building NEC 5"' Street & Coronado Drive Clearwater Beach, Florida LIES Project No. 81045- 002 -01 Dear Mr. Castrogiovanni, Universal Engineering Sciences, Inc. (LIES) has completed the preliminary geotechnical exploration at the above - referenced site in Clearwater Beach, Florida. Our scope of services was as we discussed in our January 2006 meeting, and was authorized by you. This report contains the results of our study, an engineering interpretation of the limited subsurface data obtained with respect to the conceptual project characteristics described to us, and a preliminary discussion of considerations pertaining to foundation and pavement design, general site development and site preparation. We appreciate the opportunity to have worked with you on this project and look forward to a continued association with Lucca, Inc. Please do not hesitate to contact us if you should have any questions, or if we may further assist you as your plans proceed. Respectfully submitted, UNIVERSAL ENGINEERING SCIENCES, INC. Edw a b n r., Rh.D., P.E. otechnicai gineering Manager EJG /MH:af Mark K. Hardy, P.E. Tampa Branch Manager 0 1 ""P4 REM AD JUL 161007 Distribution: Client (4 Bound) PLANNW.. CRY CLU, WX ER 9802 Palm River Road - Tampa, FI 33619 -4438 - (813) 740 -8506 - Fax (813) 740 -8706 OFFICES IN: Atlanta • Clermont • Daytona Beach - DeBary • Fort Myers • Fort Pierce • Gainesville • Hollywood • Houston • Jacksonville • Ocala • Orlando - Palm Coast - Panama City - Pensacola • Rockledge • Sarasota • St. Augustine • Tampa • West Palm Beach TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION ........................... ...........•................:.1 1.1 GENERAL .......................... ..........................:...1 1.2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION ............. ...................... ...:...... 1 2.0 PURPOSE AND METHODOLOGIES .......... ............................... 1 2.1 PURPOSE ........................... ..............................1 2.2 FIELD EXPLORATION ............... ............................... 2 2.3 LABORATORY TESTING ..... ................ ............. ........... 2 3.0 FINDINGS .......................:........ ..............................3 3.1 SURFACE CONDITIONS .............. .............................:. 3 3.2 SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS ............... .............. . ... . ....... 3 3.2.1 SOIL SURVEY .............. ............................... 3 3.2.2 SOIL BORINGS .............. ............................... 3 4.0 PRELIMINARY CONSIDERATIONS ............ ............................... 4 4.1 GENERAL .......................... ..............................4 4.2 GROUNDWATER .................................................. 4 4.3 BUILDING FOUNDATIONS ............ ............................... 5 4.3.1 LOAD TESTING ............. ......................:........ 5 4.3.2 RECOMMENDED FOUNDATION OPTION ....................... 6 4.4 PAVEMENT SECTIONS .............. ............................... 6 4.5 CONSTRUCTION CONSIDERATIONS AND SITE PREPARATION ............ 6 4.6 ADDITIONAL GEOTECHNICAL EXPLORATION ........................... 6 5.0 LIMITATIONS ................................................ ........... 7 JUL .16 2007 CITY op cui �'�r"i -10? JUL 16 2007 RAW% CITY OF LIST OF APPENDICES SITE LOCATION MAP ....................................... A SITE AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH .................................................... A SITE TOPOGRAPHIC MAP .................... I I ............................. A SCS SOIL SURVEY MAP ........................ ; ... i... . .... ; .............. A FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAPS (FIRM) ...................... ............ A BORING LOCATION PLAN .......................... 7 ......................... B BORINGLOGS ........................................................ B SOIL CLASSIFICATION CHART ....... .................. i .... t ..................... B GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION RESULTS ... i ........... ; ................. i .... :... B ASFE IMPORTANT-GEOTECHNICAL INFORMATION . . . ................ ....... ;. C CONSTRAINTS AND RESTRICTIONS ..................................... 4.;. C JUL 16 2007 RAW% CITY OF Lucca, Inc. Page 4 UES Project No. 81045- 002 -01 February 2, 2006 The shallow water table was encountered approximately 4 feet below existing grade at the boring locations. These readings were unstabilized and are subject to daily and seasonal fluctuation. Also, on this site the water table is under tidal influence, so regular, daily fluctuation in groundwater levels should be anticipated. . The boring logs and related information included in this report are indicators of subsurface conditions only at the specific locations and times noted. Subsurface conditions, including groundwater levels and the presence of deleterious materials, at other locations on the site may differ significantly from conditions which, in the opinion of UES, exist at the sampling locations. Note, too, that the passage of time may affect conditions at the sampling locations. 4.0 PRELIMINARY CONSIDERATIONS 4.1 GENERAL In this section of the report we present our preliminary considerations for building foundation and pavement design, general site preparation, and construction related activities. The following preliminary discussion is predicated upon a review of the attached soil test data, our stated assumptions, and the conceptual information you provided. When more definitive information regarding the proposed site development becomes available, UES should be retained to complete a more in- depth, project - specific geotechnical exploration. Our preliminary recommendations contained herein are subject to further refinement as additional information becomes available. Final design and construction guidelines should not be established until a more thorough geotechnical exploration of the site is completed. We identified the following three (3) primary geotechnical considerations as part of this preliminary study: The site is located on a barrier island, in a FEMA Flood Zone AE. The Base Flood Elevation (BFE) on the site ranges between +11 to +12 feet. The anticipated magnitude of the structural loads, coupled with the loose, sandy soils and shallow groundwater depths on the site will preclude the use of shallow spread or strip footings. Shallow depth to groundwater will complicate the removal of antiquated subgrade utilities, as well as the installation of new subgrade utilities, if excavation depths exceed roughly 3 feet. Dewatering will likely be necessary. _4.2_GROUNDWATER .. Based upon our visual inspection of the recovered soil samples, review of information obtained from SWFWMD and the USDA Soil Survey of Pinellas County, and our knowledge of local and regional hydrogeology, ,our b_ est estimate is -that the seasonal high groundwater level could be on_ the order of.3 feet. below the existino grade: Additionally; fie water'table will be tidally influenced JUL 16 2007 C1W OF CEEt-:,K WATER Lucca, Inc. Page 5 UES Project No. 81045 - 002 -01 February 2, 2006 on this site. Also, this estimate does not account for the possibility of temporary flooding due to excessive rainfall or other adverse weather conditions. As this site is located within a FEMA Flood Zone AE, such flooding can be expected during severe storm events. Several factors influence the determination of the seasonal high water table (SHWT). When soils are subjected to alternating cycles of saturation and drying, discoloration or staining that is not part of the dominant soil color occurs. This is called mottling, and manifests itself in various shades of gray, brown, red or yellow. There are numerous processes that lead to this discoloration, including mineral accretions, oxidation, and bacteria growth within the -soil. The presence of this discoloration indicates that groundwater has, at some point in time, reached that elevation and remained there long enough to cause any or all of these processes to occur. The SHWT elevation is assumed to be the highest point at which mottling is observed, regardless of whether water is present at the time of observation. This estimate is independent of the actual location of the groundwater table. We preliminarily expect that temporary dewatering will be required on this site if construction proceeds during the wet season, particularly if deeper excavations ( -3 feet or more) are necessary. Therefore, contract documents should provide for determining the depth to the groundwater table just prior to construction, and for any required remedial dewatering. It is usually recommended that the groundwater table be maintained at least 24 inches below all earthwork and compaction surfaces. 4.3 BUILDING FOUNDATIONS Based on the limited geotechnical information collected during this preliminary study, it is our opinion that the soil strata encountered at the boring locations should be adaptable to support the proposed structure using either a structural mat foundation or some variety of deep foundation. Provided the results of a more complete geotechnical exploration are comparable to those of this limited study, we expect that a maximum soil bearing stress on the order of 2,000 pounds per square foot (psf) is attainable, should the structural mat foundation option be desired. Should a deep foundation alternative be desired, the subsurface conditions on this site should prove favorable for the use of augered, cast -in -place piles (augercasts). We preliminary estimate that an allowable compressive resistance of 80 tons per pile should be attainable using a 16 -inch diameter augercast tipped 40 feet below the existing ground surface. Minimum footing size, minimum embedment depth, and more precise maximum bearing stress / allowable pile capacity recommendations can be developed during the next phase of the geotechnical exploration. 4.3.1 LOAD TESTING If the deep foundation option is selected, full scale load testing to at least twice the design capacity of the piles will need to be completed. Augercast piles could be tested using either static or Statnamic methods. As the allowable capacity per pile is not expected to be excessively large, static load testing using an anchored reaction frame in lieu of dead weight should prove most JUL 16 zoo? CITY OF CN U r'VVATER ATTACHMENT H Boundary/Topographic/Tree Survey • RE- PAD JUL 16 2007 q , 0'r -7 ; cl-ly OF 0!.U4WVViER s ATTACHMENT I Tree Inventory R� D JUL 16 2007 CITY GT(- • Boen's Tree Service Inc. P.O. Box 86 Ozona, FL, 34660 -0086 s Tree Inventory - Prepared for Marbella Project, Clearwater, Florida Site overview and tree canopy analysis: The subject property is on Clearwater Beach and consists of existing commercial buildings with associated parking lots, swimming pools and minimal greenspace. The tree canopy is dominated by various palm species both native and exotic. Hardwood tree species are few and nondescript in quality. The majority of palms are in good health with minor nutritional deficiencies and prior improper pruning presenting the greatest problems. Palms with an overall condition rating of 3.0 and above are recommended for on -site preservation or transplanting on -site. Tree Inventory Data The tree inventory establishes a hierarchy of existing trees to assist the site designer in the process of choosing trees to be incorporated into the site design. The inventory includes the following information: 1) Tree number - Each tree is listed by a number that corresponds to the same number physically located on the site plan indicating the location of the tree in the field. 2) Tree Size is expressed as trunk diameter measured at 4.5' above the grade. 3) Tree species is listed by both common name and botanical name the first time they appear and by common name thereafter. 4) The trees overall value ranks the tree on a scale from 0 -6 (half increments are used to increase accuracy) based on its overall health (condition). Factors such as size, species and appearance are also considered. Rating System 0 - A dead tree. (DRO���, RROINYWD JUL 16 2007 CITY OF C LUG, `WAJER 0 • 1 - Trees that are dying, severely declining, or hazardous and trees designated by the State of Florida's Exotic Pest Plant Council as a category #1 ecological pest, i.e., Brazilian pepper tree. A tree with a #1 rating should be removed. 2 - Trees exhibiting serious structural defects (i.e., codominant stems with included bark), large cavities, crown dieback, low energy, low live crown ratio, serious disease or insect problems, nutritional deficiencies or pH related problems. A tree with a #2 rating should be removed unless the problems will be mitigated. 3 - Trees that have good overall structure, crown density and systemic health with problems that can be corrected with moderate maintenance. A tree with a #3 rating should be preserved if possible. 4 - Trees with good structure and systemic health with problems that can easily be corrected with minor maintenance. Trees should exhibit good form with above average crown density. Mature trees exhibiting scars, old wounds, small cavities or other problems that are not debilitating can be included in this group particularly if they possess unique form or other aesthetic amenities relating to their age. Trees with a #4 rating should be preserved and warrant site plan modification for preservation. 5- Trees with high live crown ratio, exceptional structure, systemic health, good form and free from any serious disease, insect problem or nutritional deficiency. A tree in this category should have a balanced crown with exceptional aesthetic qualities. Trees with a #5 rating lend considerable value to the site and should be incorporated into the site design. 6- Specimen tree - A specimen tree is a tree that possesses a combination of superior qualities relating to size, specie, form, uniqueness, structure, systemic health and crown density. A specimen tree must be preserved and incorporated into a site design with an undisturbed area equal to the tree's dripline. NOTE: Palms trees with less than 10' of clear trunk are shown because they appear on the plan but are not evaluated as they are not regulated by the City of Clearwater tree ordinance. Tree Inventory Tree# Size Species Rating 7 15" Washington palm 4.5 8 4" Norfolk Island pine 2.0 9 12" Queen palm (Syagrus romazoffiana) 4.0 P Fri 10 8" Queen palm 3.0 Rfict"1$0 11 14" Sabal palm (Sabal palmetto) 3.0 JUL 16 zoo? 12 8" Queen palm 2.5 Clef - %T "LE4,''r�i�ATER 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 • 0 16" Sabal palm 3.0 15" Sabal palm 3.5 16" Sabal palm 3.5 13" Sabal palm 4.0 9" Queen palm 1.5 8" Queen palm 1.0 6" Chinese tallow (Sapium sebiferum) 1.0 8" Queen palm 2.0 11" Queen palm 3.0 12" Florida royal palm (Roystonea elata) 3.5 7" Coconut palm (Cocos nucifera) 3.0 <10'clear trunk 7" Queen palm 2.0 JUIL 16 2007 Cff Y 0T CN EiA6WATER 0 ATTACHMENT J Location Map 0 ucti,l D JUL 16 2007 7,,r� F� 0 ATTACHMENT K J Reduced (8.5 x 11) Color Site Plan with Landscaping Ovou"I jut 2W r- *E %gym it �11Y 4e/1- ". i i 0 0 ATTACHMENT L Reduced (8.5 x 11) Color Elevations and Architectural Details OZVRIOL RE-ClUIND JUL 16 2007 CITY O� CL&,,r=�JtFATER K1-O' - 2Y-D' IS'4 - a'4 POKY rs•4 _ a,-0. 1 ,lsiDK3 Q rnN REAN SETBACK MN. FRONT 9ETBAOC PER nIMICWE PER I'fMICDDE N. FRUIT SETBACK MINICODE I ^ I DNE M A IB' AND3CAP 31N ALE BARREL bA TRASH RECEPTACLE ����.� n � STORAGE K Zd -IY ]Y -Y ii'-O' ]i'4 ]A'-O' 2G'-O' ]�' -r .ro' -ID FRQlT SINGLE MRRd CK UP .'.• 6ETBACK .: _ 7.9 AREA �1 PARKING SPACES Z �� ® ® b I RIiFANLE AT GROUND LEVd TO =O b'-O' 3TALKRK: BMARBdu fA✓DISIINIYT RU' TYPICAL GARAGE PARKING DRARLAGE POND rad WAN SWAGE AT EACH SPACE. ALL OTHER (7 - ^� ® nINlnun HEIGIfT W T4 ® sP® RAnP. SEE UVIL - VAAS°ILES W Qm CLEAR EKEBT WHERE VAN ENGINEERING DRAWINGS. UP M ZIPPER LEVEI. 3�} ,. !: •. - ALCT35m, a PARKING. Df SLOPE pj b M INOMWALLY AEI'ERID. Q� �_�5 b LJ I 3FE NOTE 3 ALL IULLS SHALL t NAVE ARE to •.. •• ® �pyy !'7 l�I ;a,_ ® DN TO LOWER LEVEL p R615TANf TO WATEit W` IR SLOPE -:f DAMAGE 3FE NOTE I .• VAN ACCESB®LE PARKING ALL ENT T.I, b EXIT I SC.IEYIATICALLT TO ILLUSTRATE WITH A neuMm HEIGHT Ae'O STACIONG R®IIIRFnENT3. IN4 u-a e'-D' of e' -r aEAll TYPIGV. n , - ® ___ - _ FRIAL EGUIPnEHT SdFLTION PoR VAN PARKRiG AHD - AND LOfJ.TIDN TD BE RYIUDED ORIVEYNTS. IN fQiSIRUCARI DOUA"IEilT Q ' P°N5E !7F PROJECT. a VAN t� 0 FKWIED EACL -uP nIRR02 t. �S t TD BE LOCATED &-G' AF.F. WITHIN �.. _ LIMITS OF BLAND SO THAT A VAN rj DR.- CAN SEE VFNI_ W THE }Yr!'L RAMP FRLTI THEIR REAR VIFYI ® rvrrc m DN DRIVERS SIDE S ® ® 89M5 TED 5K.T1 sTATNG . _EN YKVNTED ON ® a OPFtcE BLAND MIEx BAUDxc•. � V FENCE CANRER FRM w RR. L FLODR TO UNDE1 _ OF E E ca ur q STAIR STRINGER AT EAST T AND WEBT TRASH RECEPTACLE 3B - SPACES (PRIVATE) _ VAN ACCESSIBLE PARKING le'd J/ !TH A nINRNn HEIGHT EI.F.S. STSTFM TO BE BOLTED CLEAR TYPICAL lam- r W Q W TYPIUL AT EACH LlVEl FOR VAN PARKING \V C AND GUARDRAIL -. IN STAIRS ORIVEIMY3. _ C . TO BTU' NIW. TYRW� � L S 33 �C ELEV ELEV. } Z V 0 o m �co ci az 4 ' _ Z a .f ru t®Bl• D TN c.F.RC. O 5 F 4 OPEN. iIII III Iii OPEN y STAIR •• All u VAN ACLF391BLE PAiIX1NG b SITE VIBIBILITf U C> (o WITH A nINIMUn HEGHT - TRIANGLE O LF C -1' CFAR. TYPICAL - D - 9PACE9 (PRIVATE) VAN PARKING AND - Z IX°IVEWATS. b s %4e H / /H,F RJANpCAPIN= W.I JDB wD GARAGE DATA �• STANDARD PARKING STALL - 3K pRAy/H BY .. - - :. •. ._ .- EXIT ... .:. ENTRANCE 2 IuNDIU.v vARIDHC srALL - e � - HANDICAP VAN PARKING STALL - EXTERKM PARKING STALL - II f9E DALE _ TOTAL PARKING 3TMl - 3T)r YY 4 �OD1 APPRmt. GARAGE AREA -,v,— 5f FIFTH STREET ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN b B o : ARPA PFR PARK NG STALL - 3TC v a GROUND LEVEL PLAN .nmN AROUND svACe w GTH LEVd '� Na®1 arAAa r . v4 PLAx I3 xDr Irnuom Ix TDrAI AO.1 PARKING STALL flJ11NT. NJ I5 10 9 0 10 20 30 RL-CAVr#D- JUL 16 2007 P L A N Xt Hr'; D CFAG-i F �, 2, E Ti CITY OF C L&!KVX E R • 0 V/1 LAI IN NJ I5 10 9 0 10 20 30 RL-CAVr#D- JUL 16 2007 P L A N Xt Hr'; D CFAG-i F �, 2, E Ti CITY OF C L&!KVX E R • 0 •0006'tftC f'/Jfg1G,. TYPICAL LEVEL PLAN 3RD THRU 5TH 20 15 10 s 0 10 20 30 eWi w' • f4 OR;G )4 JUL 16 2007 �LkmN r � p; Cz, , ti IEM Cis ;L &ti kWATER • M•b' Yl -. IIIj b'O 7�'-c' ...- A b'-a TI -t^ N -N' f - P a -a /• T w vrrn inn s _y -ume sr ru snw uva r2! f0 r[ti[M tdv4 O.:Y p(4'[ W f0 IPRR UN0. 1 v-v m.ce`a�`nvn�iiRVn, •'m fMWIpC bTNSNRD Of d 6 P w so n a rx uve� sa a:t>re iri m .v.x� uvn ¢ M r0 Kn iLYtL Da W[d'< tR i0 IAYII%LLVn. t L7 � a -0' rY -a L i- ( nr•rx cnwsc ovwr. rt'ntttl N ^LIL LY L4 la• uP - •0006'tftC f'/Jfg1G,. TYPICAL LEVEL PLAN 3RD THRU 5TH 20 15 10 s 0 10 20 30 eWi w' • f4 OR;G )4 JUL 16 2007 �LkmN r � p; Cz, , ti IEM Cis ;L &ti kWATER • O—LIX7ro LEVEL PLAN RE-CIFAD JUL 16 2007 LEj4MAIER • FE/m, EE HE 77>, 7z IUU O—LIX7ro LEVEL PLAN RE-CIFAD JUL 16 2007 LEj4MAIER • l _. ■e1111�1III�II��IIl1i..- _nU111���I�IIIII�IIII:e._ ��. - ice■ ■■�■ _■�■■■�i - 6■0c.= ' .. a :::— ��li�:— ri■■ ■. ®� ®°..�■ ■�— �n�7" ■i: HE: 0 ■i■4 ■■ ■1111■ �' __� ■����� �■•� u■_ =■tin u: ■u■ �E PSG■ 6 ■= ��9�.�� ■__■u■_ ■i■■ ■■. ■■■ ■— aid■ -��-__ - ■■■ -■■. c■■■ ■■■ ■n.. ■V ■.. HH. me 017.121: _ i•�•- 7: ::— �i_ :ii :i : :: : :: - -- � ��.r•■.i r �. \1`t;p!a`- Er`.g �.ri i :� —' r� ; ".•�- ,i'1.x��_III�!�� \ \. ��' �� � 1�f � _ ;,!E •'; ct °hl�J,l��. 1 @IIL,, \ \V'.f�� � �'{.�I ;�r7_ ■�:f(�:t.� %mld. ����E�w!7j: : ` �=. \S•.:��. '�.. %��t��e•'��y:. - _': / / /RI�)I_� - 'ilt' \F_`�: _ : - \' BENZ,, .� d'� "r: ?'• % %F;U7` - a;s:E 1�1 1111' 3 YI -,1111 I►y�1 : tlfi,ll 1�1 1.6i ^ " -� iP��t'iZ��l ►' �Tliyi�TE!! Mi■ti11'_•�.�i fi \�E> � l%� i LJ t li7l �,i� � \Ir i■Y= aEI(�i■ iiil��ti lurI INS m 0 - 0 - 0 - - © .. OKEY PLAN FEVOOM OMGR,tAL RECEMED AUG 03 2007 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITYOF CLEARWATER j a, & P 2. lu=7 Egli HIN as Not's rur —rur .fin dom-m— also ..IN to-1; Baia Ell oll ..I w:: N'lle lRommi , - Z1.1. I is iti ! 1. so Ill. &Is us.. am. MIMI- MAWINIX F Rig, M %57t 1. 50 al —mm 10 I �.��.. ; =.) EMU ilawripm rm-�,o ..a .1. 460 Atv&l.jl NO 20 15 10 5 0 10 20 50 NORTH ELEVATION ............. MATEMAL COLM SCHEOU� KFY PLAN IEVMMM 0 ORIGINAL RECEIVED iL�TiAlL14Ti AUG 03 2007 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER a cis ca cc Nee o Wm� ACTUAL OUILLTNG Ete /ATIaI NEIafT ABp�E NeQ1T APOJE Aea.E SEA FErI„ F.F. ELEVATIW LEVEL q: Q' NAw N (NAw ED) TT4 a'I %' n95' T' CF ItP fr1ZF STUiaNG SEUY rUTAL iKLF. nax can ro rune case ta. .�,�• E1.F.S. I7ETAIL PtMi.IAT axl6eEfE BO1Tat OF FAGA axOR a�1�1 axaTtl. axCA f1 PAINIID AILYEEPI AUWOIM (N1 �NG� LI'4 i"/35' E535' Q EI.F.s. DETAIL cotaa s1 rr�' PRE��T fCA�NCREIE . ® ® tTMEN�LAem1NG 11PP L 41 FuNlFD aWREIE �'3• 5� -�• b� ADO YUT11 RED sa SP�PmiANOINC E FS. All ® u ffl co MLrnNUn ruse �•R 'D3i' � C r 3. UPPERwtt]ING O ® v lifTo axa: x•�• 1N.t�' � G.F.RL. IIETDR.ttNE UP�PER�OINr. PANEL a ;LR i'! t 3 PuNrED uJR1W Vt e'WWa14 (NO HALetb) raai a3 is'4 113x' 935' 11• t12D.8SIID ElF.A Sn;TS+ ZMD l�.PtmING b axon a 1� d4 5 t0 J x 1i'cTimLF1'OReiwNOlNC 3S 1 3 ZO 15 10 9 O 10 ZO 30 EAST ELEVATION ® NAMDEN DRIVE x,Aa w' - re roe NO: dmz MATMAL CMM xumuL.e rase ranee taae nUUFACTAIeI MAwN er ®non wwun - rvalee - sNNaT a Etnwn rolllAre - Axar FEert - sr_. ORE DALE e amlm Nawn - F1cr�oe rvr - elt®t .ur >41ouF aLa sztln wuEUU -emu wrre -stmt Nn: no rawsm n vAnwe KEY PLAN sffr ram L±2Lj A S 3L°�53 - �w>• um aTM uvn isz � M % CD o �37a �`'-- .an tcvn. • �. ar.WS � —•�rii utiitrsr. -�" � ^� [aflA iPiWT •nauWs T) 0 rrx- c�ir n � `"�—� - - - i°.• w�xr'rii /m°w.0e � Di pp n. • rupro> R.>+w C /L1, /CQ .rW vAN /J ptAfWKG ��/ ,o,s.rowY a b DIAGRAMATIC AXOV6M2TRIC — TWO WAY TRAFFICp fG4L Ri.A tt i �I J 0 WO: O lm BY: mkon s�s.a Atl JUL. 16 2Q97 Cily MMER i • rcvtronD p x s. L �- SILI flp:C�Y11TR LANa��� TYIMffL rt: Y 9 ♦wfMtP A, - _iew�uh \� LYM14CLRS PAal1pK' 3 CD tv LINE OF SIGHT @ HAMDEN DRIVE 0 ID sv1L lip' � 1'4� - atH R R � IONFR IMpNG .�R .IY. ItY1YtPKARt@ � „I'LL` GY 'M rtDGt -_I .tM[R tN+puG AvReD PIWRNUr1� i rplWCtb pCRRG1p.Y PALM ®� INRt� tNtLIPS 0.6IIUtlG XB MD: 5 on n� -o• L -. Drown 0Y k B] E DATE 20 15 10 5 0 10 20 30 ur 4 loot LINE OF SIGHT 0 CORONADO DRIVE awn w• • ro• 9t£T N�B91 A32 0 JUIL 16 2007 P14- CITY CL&J R I WMER P[AW* -7, rZ'; CITY G't�' CL& Nvlkf E R 0 0 ravlmn (J Q OTHCRL f411 YOGI mw TO N— Mmvm�-- C4U* •2,4 M�T 6r.v co --0 16- cp AUA� 4I IMRYN PA- -- M-1 20 15 to 5 0 to 20 so NEST ELEVATION 4 CORONADO DRIVE .108 80 DM BY: i!2 I KEY PLAN JUL 16 2007 K r7 7 Tv. '�JTY ")"7C,'k.& iXfER is 2015to5o 10 20 Do MkTOM4L WLOR SCMIM" SOUTH ELEVATION 0 FIFTH STREET .rue• W. — 16 2007 CITj " 4 KEY PLAN =I-Xi: I =v==- "NOi oz 6 %w BY: Men MEMO,= ... Na I * is W AM 41:14: ON. IN: 1. 1 1- go.. MINE ROM 8419 P7 Jill I M — I , 2015to5o 10 20 Do MkTOM4L WLOR SCMIM" SOUTH ELEVATION 0 FIFTH STREET .rue• W. — 16 2007 CITj " 4 KEY PLAN =I-Xi: I =v==- "NOi oz 6 %w BY: • ATTACHMENT M Comprehensive Landscape Criteria C%-j °Clearwater 0 • Planning Department 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, Florida 33756 Telephone: 727 - 562 -4567 Fax: 727 - 562 -4865 ❑ SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION ❑ SUBMIT 14 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION - Plans and application are required to be collated, stapled and folded into sets • CASE NUMBER: RECEIVED BY (Staff Initials): DATE RECEIVED: * NOTE: A TOTAL OF 15 SETS OF THIS APPLICATION AND ALL SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION IS REQUIRED TO BE SUBMITTED IN CONJUNCTION W ITH A COMPLETE LEVEL ON E OR LEVEL TWO APPLIC ATION. COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM (Revised 03/29/2006) PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT- APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4- 202.A) APPLICANT NAME: Ly<ex t I,eyri,e>omk c-2= L-r— MAILINGADDRESS: 501151. WN-10+16t A-"- LAS, 1113 . 11- 1102"Il PHONE NUMBER: (7030 410- 0r1oS CELLNUMBER: (i0g) Ltjo -- PROPERTYOWNER(S): W,,eA4 Lx—c- List ALL owners on the deed AGENT NAME: W NA-r'2 -'{3 � k S&0C-1AcTk--7S MAILING ADDRESS: yZ.(o0 L-z Catt /a'C -,- . TA PHONE NUMBER: C K13) FAX NUMBER: CELLNUMBER: 1211) 1(07 -- E- MAILADDRESS: 1. ARCHITECTURAL THEME: b R a. The landscaping in a Comprehensive Landscape Program shall be designed as a part of the architectural theme of the principal buildings proposed or developed on the parcel proposedforthede%dopment. S.�2T JUI 16 2007 ORe,Ef �:`'�&IER b. The design, character, location and/or materials of the landscape treatment proposed in the Comprehensive Landscape Program shall be demonstrably more attractive than landscaping otherwise permitted on the parcel proposed for development under the minimum landscape stan dards. f 1 F— AiTNC-0 . M C:IDocumentsand Settings lderek. fergusonlDesktopinewplanningfileslComprehensive Landscape Pro gram2006.doc Pagel of 2 0 0 2. LIGHTING: Any lighting proposed as a part of a Comprehensive Landscape Program is automatically controlled so that the lighting is turned off when the business is closed. • SIFF ,- tAct%_ M 3. COMMUNITY CHARACTER: The landscape treatment proposed in the Co mpr ehe nsi vE La ndsc ape Program W I I enhance the community character of the City of Clear water. SE t Jlr►TItcG1� 4. PROPERTY VALUES: The landscape treatment proposed in the Comprehensive Landscape Program will have a beneficial impact on the value of the property i n the immediate vicinity ofthe parcel proposedfor development. S� � Ac i i irGl'i 5. SPECIAL AREAOR SCENIC CORRIDOR PLAN: The landscape treatment proposed in the Comprehensive Landscape Program is consistent with any special area or scenic corridor plan which the City of Clearwater has prepared and adopted for the area i n which the parcel proposed for deval opment is located. OR-7101N'241 UA" tl r) 6 791- t THE LANDSCAPING REQUIREMENTS OF ARTICLE 3, DIVISION 12 MAY BE WAIVED OR MODIFIED AS A PART OF A LEVEL ONE OR LEVEL TWO APPLICATION, AS THE CASE MAY BE, IF THE APPLICATION FOR DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL INCLUDES A COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM, WHICH SATISFIES THE ABOVE CRITERIA. THE USE OF LANDSCAPE PLANS, SECTIONS / ELEVATIONS, RENDERINGS AND PERSPECTIVES MAYBE NECESSARYTO SUPPLEMENT THE INFORMATION PROVIDED ON THIS WORKSHEET. SIGNATURE: I, the undersigned, acknowledge that all representations made in this application are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge and authorize City representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application. / l //A _'/9 / / SignaWfe of proper"Ter or re present ati ve STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELL/�S Swo nd subscribed before me this day of �-�— o to me and/or by 'fin I who il persoajZLRjjbWhas Notarypublj!/ / Mycommis o res: �/,�,•� 5�.,� �Q /� �. wu W • dI C:IDocuments and Settings lderek.fergusonlDesktop Pa e 2 wl n gfleslComprehensive LandscapePro� � 9 2 /11/1 • ATTACHMENT M • MARBELLA PARKING GARAGE — PARCEL B COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE CRITERIA SPECIFIC REQUESTS: - Reduce required foundation landscaping on south side of the building from 5' to 2' from the curb to the front of the columns (4' to building wall). 1. ARCHITECTURAL THEME: The design, character, location and/or materials of the landscape treatment proposed in the Comprehensive Landscape Program shall be demonstrably more attractive than landscaping otherwise permitted on the parcel under the minimum landscape standards. RESPONSE: A minimum 5 -ft wide landscaped area is required along the east, west and south building facades as per City Land Development Code Section 3- 1202.E.2. The applicant proposed to reduce the landscape area along the southern facade of the buildin� along 5th Street. This area will be part of a private parking lot screened from 5' Street by a solid wall. As per City Review staff direction, landscaping shall be placed on the south side of the solid wall along 5t" Street so that it can be seen by pedestrians and motorist on 5`" street. In order to provide the width needed for appropriate landscaping between the screen wall and south property line, the required 5 -ft foundation landscaping area along the south facade was reduced. By doing this the design, character and location of the landscape treatment proposed shall be more attractive to the community than the landscaping otherwise permitted under the minimum landscape standards, which would have shielded the foundation landscaping from the community. 2. LIGHTING: Any Lighting proposed as part of a Comprehensive Landscape Program is automatically controlled so that the lighting is turned off when the business is closed. RESPONSE: Not applicable. The proposed facility shall serve as a public and private parking facility that will not "close" for business. 3. COMMUNITY CHARACTER: The landscape treatment proposed in the Comprehensive Landscape Program will enhance the community character of the City of Clearwater. RESPONSE: By reducing the required foundation landscaping along the south facade, the applicable will have the ability to add landscape treatment south of the proposed screen wall where it will be visible to the community, thus enhancing the community character. 0 0 4. PROPERTY VALUES: The landscape treatment proposed in the Comprehensive Landscape Program will have a beneficial impact on the value of the property in the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. RESPONSE: The proposed development is located within the "Small Hotel District" of Clearwater as per the Beach by Design Guidelines. The immediate vicinity is characterized by a high density of small hotels, some of which have converted to residential uses, with minimal on -site amenities and landscaping treatment. Replacing a number of these small hotels with a new development bounded by code - complain landscape treatment will significantly enhance the aesthetics of the immediate area. Such an improvement in appearance in regards to landscape treatment, will benefit hotel business directly adjacent to the site, and increase property values of surrounding residential properties as well. 5. SPECIAL AREA OR SCENIC CORRIDOR PLAN: The landscape treatment proposed in the Comprehensive Landscape Program is consistent with any special area or scenic corridor plan which the City of Clearwater has prepared and adopted for the area in which the parcel proposed for development is located. RESPONSE: Not Applicable since 5th Street is not part of a City designated Scenic Corridor. However, by adding treatment on the south side of the screen wall will accent the recent landscaping improvements installed by the City as part of the Coronado Drive renovations. • . i ATTACHMENT N Parcel Numbers and Addresses v JUL 16 2007 pi AN III -. D-CC wIII-NI T CIS CF CLUA WAFER ATTACHMENT N MARBELLA PARKING GARAGE — PARCEL B PARCEL NUMBERS AND ADDRESSES PARCEL ID NUMBERS Parcel A: - 07/29/15/52380/000 /0630 - 07/29/15/52380/000 /1110; Parcels B and C: - 08/29/15/17586/001 /0120 - 08/29/15/17586/001 /0130 - 08/29/15/17586/001 /0140 - 08/29/15/17604/000 /0080 - 08/29/15/17604/000 /0100 ADDRESSES Parcel A: - 325 S. Gulfview Blvd. - 326 Coronado Dr. Parcel B: - 345, 347 and 353 Coronado Dr. - 350 Hamden Dr. JUL 16 2007 ATTACHMENT 0 Surrounding Building Heights JUL 16 2007 PLAN NW-3, CRY OF CLUAIWAYER Legend Project Site "- • , �,M- f'- �i► a- A •i� �J� +reM•� 111 ^.Ali ��i�'�;r?,i+,y �jo-.� • �+ .� r r Air rod +' .1f 4b yJ rIk ; y • �Vf�16 i •, >L: • 1�i f. - ADJACENT BUILDINGS SUMMARY l- ID 1 t 2 4 5 r 6 ,+ 7 8 9 Stories Approximate Height Feet 15 1 2 20 1 15 2 25 1 15 2 1 30 2 25 5 60 10 11 5 55 Under Construction 12 3 30 13 15 200 14 3 45 15 4 50 16 15 200 17 15 200 18 5 55 Water Resource Associates, Inc. PROJECT: Marbella Parldng Garage - Parcel B - Clearwater Beach, FL Engineering - Planning - Environmental Sciarce 4260 West Linebaugh Avenue Phone: -265 --3130 ADJACENT BUILDING HEIGHTS 912 Fax: 813- 265 -6610 www.wraconsultants.com ORIGINAL DATE: 07 -16 -07 N REVISION DATE: none W �� L JOB NUMBE=R: 0491 FILE NAME: location map.mxd S GIs OPERATOR: VG 1 Inch = 200 Feet q P5 A6 2007 CITIYOT CLUAWWER 0 I* 0 • ATTACHMENT P Fire Flow Calculations O�qqegvj RIE-UlWD UL 16 2007 CITY OF ClUgWATER 07/16/2007 09:16 7275624961 • PUBLIC UTILITIES Mr PAGE 02 FLOW TEST CITY OF CLEARWATER WATER DEPARTMENT LOCATION �.� �C7 �° Ir S f Ono DATE OF TEST? STATIC: PSI RESIDUAL PSI _:... b2--c,-c4d A43/ 1PITOT PSI % u-. ric�. 6A 49t� FLOW GPM 1HYDRANT # IGRID # C ` 7 L IMISC: HbA oc�-er Pesource As-5 CUSTOMER REQUESTING TEST -z- M ONN"4' „ JUL 16 2007 PLAN %�r;� CCp TENT CITY OF CLUANM-I ER ATTACHMENT Q Turn Templates OR10i RIR iUi ND .;I,JL 1.6 2007 CITY OF VTiAVVA-IER 0 0 I O Q / 1 ' .......... :ry 6 � '`' S�225 .` =�: •" 30•'f =� � •.o .........::::::::::. .:,• .... .::.; 220 00, .. RIM RM MAI k:::-::. OLE ..+.a . > RIM RM MAf IN::: f ;: OL • 3.2 O J., 30" SCR EN WALL ,ti 30" CREEN WALL = ;. r • � "! I E/P 36' SCREEN WALY - `` O ti a �� 30" SCREEN WACLry, 1 GRATE INLET W ti� GRATE INLET W '' TOP =3.03 TOP =3.03' �� '•• � 20 A _ _� SptiA INV.(N)=- 0.02'0 INV.(E)= (- 1.08'Q IuV•(W)= (-1.68') y� � ' 4 0` E/P INV.(N) =- 0.02'0 eoc I�b INV.(E)= (- 1.08'Q� INV.(W) =(- 1.68') b IOMT—OF,1yA y 'i, lb _-_, TEFT'�TI =; ' ry ' - �RRSE &� _ t ry�> 1 inch - -feet �?0 ST sro f Water Resource Associates, Inc, Engineering - Planning - Environmental Science PROJECT: Marbella Parking Garage - Clearwater, FL WRA PROJECT #: 0491 DESIGNED BY: VG TURN TEMPLATE ORIGINAL DATE: 07 -16 -07 DRAWN BY: VG 4260 W Linebaugh Ave. REVISED DATE: NA APPROVED BY: MDF Tampa, Florida 33624 Phone: 813.265.3130 Fax: 813.265.6610 VEHICLE P - AASHTO 2001 (19') FILE: t— wn,plaw-dwg SHEET SCALE: 1 in= 20 ft www.wraconsultants.com 1 Of 1 0 0 r X01 r } Receipt #: 1200700000000005010 p= Date: 06/08/2007 r Line Items: Case No Tran Code Description FLD2007 -06020 04 Flexible Commercial FLD2007 -06020 Fire - Prelim Site Plan _ Payments: Revenue Account No 010 - 341262 010 - 342501 Line Item Total: 6/8/2007 10:29:41 AM Amount Paid 1,205.00 200.00 $1,405.00 1W Method Payer Initials Check No Confirm No How Received Amount Paid Check WATER RESOURCE ASSOC R_D 6799 In Person Payment Total: THIS IS NOT A PERMIT. This is a receipt for an application for a permit. This application will be reviewed and you will be notified as to the outcome of the application. Page 1 of 1 1,405.00 $1,405.00 cReceipupt lob CLWCoverSheet • 0 FLD2007 -06020 325 S GULFVIEW BLVD ELLA PARKING GARAG PLANNER OF RECORD: WW ATLAS # UNK ZONING: T LAND USE: RFH RECEIVED: 06/08/2007 INCOMPLETE: COMPLETE: MAPS: PHOTOS: STAFF REPORT: DRC: Al 1311 ,p ► Pav 1 of 2 Wells, Wayne From: Delk, Michael Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 9:35 AM To: Clayton, Gina; Wells, Wayne Subject: FW: Joe Burdette - Re: Lucca- Release the Parking Contingency M Michael. L. Delk, AICP Planning. Director City of Clearwater,. Florida myclearwater.com - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Dougall- Sides, Leslie Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 8:54 AM To: Akin, Pam; Delk, Michael Subject: FW: Joe Burdette - Re: Lucca- Release the Parking Contingency FYI From: Hunraf @aol.com [mailto:Hunraf @aol.com] Sent: Tue 6/10/2008 9:41 PM To: marklrealtor @hotmail.com Cc: Irwin, Rod; Dougall- Sides, Leslie; Ehooperl @aol.com Subject: Re: Joe Burdette - Re: Lucca- Release the Parking Contingency Mark As we said, all we need is a email from Rod Irwin to this effect and that the density from this site will be transferred to the Lucca across the street... Without the transfer of density we cannot proceed any further. Is getting an email from Rod Irwin as to what he told you a problem? We would also like the email from Rod Irwin to state that we were told to go through you and not directly with the city. This bit of confusion needs to be cleared up as well... As I told you, Luke is here tomorrow and once we have clarification in writing from Rod Irwin, Luke is ready to move forward... Joe In a message dated 6/10/2008 5:09:14 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, marklrealtor @hotmail.com writes: Joe, At least we are headed in the right direction. My belief is that the City wants to purchase a piece of land unencumbered. The price would be given with or without the density. No contingicies. The City would need that in 6/12/2008 , Page 2 of 2 writing both from Luke and whoever else needs to be in the loop to allow it to happen. What I am saying is the receiver named would have to sign off on the deal. The City asked me to bring them all viable sites and would consider Luke's only if it is free and clear and signed off on by the FINAL decisionmakers. They have no appetite for anything else. I start meeting with Council members tomorrow and will keep it on the list if we can get to this goal QUICKLY. Thanks! mark Wm. MARK SEARCY CLEARWATER BEACH FLORIDAYS LATITUDE 27.9983 /LONGITUDE - 82.82785 >From: Hunraf @aol.com >To: marklrealtor@hotmaii.com >CC: leslie.dougall- sides @myclearwater.com, Ehooper1 @ aol.com, >rod.Irwin @myclearwater.com, luke.luccainc @comcast.net >Subject: Joe Burdette - Re: Lucca- Release the Parking Contingency >Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2008 14:12:18 EDT >Mark >Luke just emailed me and told me that he will take out the contingency for >needing parking in the city garage and will work out his own parking in the >design of his new projects however he can. >Luke will be in town tomorrow and, contingent on him getting an email from >Rod Irwin telling him to do so, will sign your commission agreement to >present >his property for $4,500,000.00. >There will remain the contingency of transferring the density off of the >site to his other site (which, as I told you, the city agreed to before). >If >that is not an acceptable contingency then that would be a "deal killer." >Let me know what to do next. >Joe > * * * * * * * * * * * ** *Vote for your city's best dining and nightlife. City's Best >2008. ( http: / /citysbest.aol.com ?ncid= aolacg00050000000102) Vote for your city's best dining and nightlife. City's Best 2008. 6/12/2008 4- 0 9 Y Wells, Wayne EMMEMN From: Delk, Michael Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2008 9:16 AM To: Dougall- Sides, Leslie; Wells, Wayne Cc: Clayton, Gina; Treuhaft, Linda Subject: RE: GM07 -9216B -009: RE: Marbella Project - 325 S. Gulfview Blvd. IblNumAttach: 0 M essageG UID: {A79AEOA5 -FC 13 -49B8- 8524 -OC2 E6A56CAB B} OriginalDate: None Originator: SQL Style: Lucca Marbella South Beach Parking Garage proposal Wayne - Proceed accordingly. Michael L. Delk, AICP Planning Director City of Clearwater, Florida myclearwater.com - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Dougall- Sides, Leslie Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2008 9:14 AM To: Delk, Michael; Wells, Wayne Cc: Clayton, Gina; Treuhaft, Linda Subject: GM07 -9216B -009: RE: Marbella Project - 325 S. Gulfview Blvd. I concur, based. upon the facts set forth below. The Minor Revision Development Order did not amend the required time frame to submit for permits, nor does its. issuance initiate an additional time period within which to obtain permits. - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Delk, Michael Sent: Wednesday, April 23, 2008 1:28 PM To: Wells, Wayne Cc: Clayton, Gina; Dougall- Sides, Leslie Subject: RE: Marbella Project - 325 S. Gulfview Blvd. Wayne. -. Barring any opinion of a legal nature from Leslie to the contrary, I consider the DO as it relates to. the primary residential parcel of the development plan to have expired. I�lichae L. Belk, AICP Planning Director City of Clearwater, Florida myclearwater.com - - - -- Original Mess From: Sent: To: Delk, Michael Cc: Clayton, Gina Subject: Michael - age---- - Wells, Wayne Tuesday, April 22, 2008 3:37 PM Marbella Project - 325 S. Gulfview Blvd, I do not see where. I ever got a response to this email. What would you (and /or Leslie) opine? Wayne ii • • - - - -- Original Message ----- ��� From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Friday, January 25, 2008 2:27 PM To: Delk, Michael Cc: Clayton, Gina; Thompson, Neil; Molter, Molly Subject: Marbella Project - 325 S. Gulfview Blvd. Michael - Molly brought to my attention after she was researching the above address to answer customer questions that it appears the Development Order for the residential project has expired. Following are the actions approved for this property: 1. On July 19, 2005, the CDB approved Case Nos. FLD2005- 02021/TDR2005- 03020/PLT2005 -00010 with 15 conditions of approval (Development Order dated July 21, 2005) to permit a total of 102 attached dwelling units (92 units on Parcel A and 10 units on Parcel B). An amended Development Order was issued June 16, 2006, to reflect the two years granted by the CDB to submit for a building permit (was in original D.O. as Condition #2).. Under both of these Development Orders, a building permit to construct the proposed improvements was to be submitted no later than July 19, 2007. 2. A Time Extension Development Order for Case Nos. FLD2005-02021 /TDR2005-03020/PLT2005-0001 0 was issued by the Planning Director on March 13, 2007, granting an additional six months to January 19, 2008, to submit for a building permit. 3. On August 13, 2007, a Minor Revision Development Order was issued for Case Nos. FLD2005- 0202 1 /TDR2005-03020/PLT2005-0001 0 with 13 additional conditions of approval to permit basically the relocation of all 10 dwelling units on Parcel B to Parcel A, so that all 102 dwelling units would be on Parcel A. 4. On August 21, 2007, the CDB approved Case No. FLD2007 -06020 with 14 conditions of approval to permit the addition of a parking garage for 377 parking spaces (including 300 public parking spaces) on Parcel B to a previously approved project of 102 dwelling units. The first two conditions of this Case No. FLD2007 -06020 stated "That approval of this Flexible. Development case is. subject to the approval of a Development Agreement with the City;" and "That all prior conditions of approval under FLD2005- 02021 by the CDB. and under the Minor Revision are still applicable, except as modified through this application approval ;" All conditions of approval on this case related. to the parking garage only, except conditions #5 and #6 dealing with the need to record a Unity of Title (for condominiums) and the need to record a condominium plat. This case was not approved with any greater time frame to submit a building permit to construct the garage building than normal code (one -year time frame to August 21, 2008). 5. The Staff Report for Case No. FLD2007 -06020 stated "The approvals granted for the development of the 102 attached dwellings on Parcel A will not be affected." 6. There was no request submitted to request the CDB to extend the time frame approved by the Planning Director under the original approval for Case Nos. FLD2005-02021/TDR2005- 03020/PLT2005 -00010 (see #2 above). There was no agenda item on the .laouary 1515, 200:8„ I Off agenda for any time extension for the residential project approved under Case Nos. FLD2005 -02021 /TDR2005- 03020/PLT2005 -00010 Based on, the above, it appears that the original approval for the residential project under Case Nos. FLD2005- 02021/TDR2005- 03020/PLT2005 -00010 has. now expired and become void. It is unclear if the applicant was erroneously thinking that the approval granted under Case No. FLD2007 -06020 reset the clock for the residential project to the approval time frames for the parking garage addition. Please advise. Wayne 4 Wells,. Wayne • From:. Delk, Michael Sent: Wednesday,. April 23, 2008.8:28 AM To: Wells, Wayne; Clayton, Gina Subject:. FW:. Joe. Burdette -. Re: Lucca Property 6VI Michael L. Delk,. AICP Planning. Director City of Clearwater, Florida. myclearwater.com - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Kronschnabl, Jeff Sent: Tuesday, April 22, 2008 4:13 PM To: Delk, Michael; Garriott, Kevin Subject: FW: Joe Burdette - Re: Lucca Property - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Kronschnabl, Jeff Sent: Tuesday, April 22, 2008 3:33 PM To: Silverboard, Jill Cc: Akin, Pam; Dougall- Sides, Leslie; Horne, William Subject: FW: Joe Burdette - Re: Lucca Property FYI - - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Hunraf @aol.com [mailto:Hunraf @aol.com] Sent: Tuesday, April 22, 2008 3:20 PM To: Kronschnabl, Jeff Cc: luke.luccainc @comcast.net; Ehooperl @aol.com Subject: Joe Burdette - Re: Lucca Property 618 Pineland Ave Belleair, Florida, 33756 4/25/2008 • Page 1. of 3 �„ � • • Page. 2 of 3 Jeff Kronschnable Director Development & Neighborhood Services City of Clearwater, Florida Re: Letter of April 21, 2008 — numerous properties, Clearwater Beach Jeff I am in receipt of your letter of April 21, 2008 and have discussed it with Luke Castogiovanni of Lucca. Development and would ask your consideration for the following time line to either demolish or bring into compliance all of the properties that are a subject of the April 21, 2008 letter. First, it is Lucca's plan to keep open the following hotels:. A. The Roma B. The Beach View C. Key Lime D. The Falcon. E. The triplex located at 345 Coronado. F. Backstreet Cafe. This is currently closed and will be used for offices for the development company. We plan to reopen in the early. fall.. Lucca believes those units to now be in substantial compliance and if they are not they will be made totally compliant by May 1, 2008. Lucca intends to demolish the following hotels: A. Tropicana B. Albatross. C. Bay. Lawn D. Gulf Beach. These properties are having a security fence installed around them beginning today and the fence should be complete in a day or two. Lucca will screw the windows and doors shut and the pools have all been drained.. All of the units to be demolished are thought to contain asbestos. In order to begin any demolition, there will need to be an asbestos survey done and literally hundreds of samples taken and sent to the laboratoryy for testing. It will take some time to bid and hire a environmental company to do this work.. I would think about a month, as they will all have to. inspect the properties prior to. giving Lucca a bid price. I would suggest that this process will take to. June 1. to complete.. After the asbestos survey is complete, an asbestos removal plan must be prepared for approval by the County for air quality control and by EPA. This is about a 6 -week process taking us to the middle. of July or so. Once the asbestos removal plan has been approved the bids for actually removing the asbestos can go out. All of the bidders will want to visit the site prior to bidding so I would suggest that this is another. 4/25/2008 Page 3 of 3 30. day process taking us to the middle of August. Once the asbestos removal has begun, I would think it could be completed in about 6 -weeks (depending on the extent of the asbestos has determined by the asbestos survey mentioned above) and should be completed around September 30. Following the asbestos removal Lucca would be in a position to begin demolition of the properties.. There is a 10 day "notice" period required before beginning any demolition so. Lucca could begin demolition on or about Oct 15. There are a couple of issues that need further consideration.. Most importantly is that Lucca is planning on submitting a plan to construct two hotels on his 3.67. acres.. He would be submitting plans for such construction as soon as the cityy receives its approvals back from DCA and has second reading on the density ordinance the council passed at its last meeting. As Lucca really has no control of exactly when this might occur, his non - conforming density units that he currently has become problematic.. If he demolishes the buildings there are two problems. The first problem is that the properties to be demolished have non - conforming units that Lucca needs to keep. for his future projects. I don't think this is a big issue, but would like to discuss this with you further. The second problem is that if the new density ordinance does not get passed by DCA or on second reading, Lucca will then want to renovate the units rather than demolish them. We should know all of this by July or August and should not affect us between now and then as Lucca will be dealing with asbestos issues during that time. I hope these time tables are acceptable to you. Should you have any questions please give me a call and I will be glad to come in and sit down with you at your convenience. Thanks for your help. Joe Need a new ride? Check out the largest site for U.S.. used car listings at AOL Autos.. 4/25/2008 di Wells, Wayne From: Clayton, Gina Sent: Tuesday, April 22,. 2008.1:16 PM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: FW: Mr. Castrogiovanni Letter #2 FYI - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Kronschnabl, Jeff Sent: Tuesday, April 22, 2008 1:04 PM To: Silverboard, Jill; Akin, Pam Cc: Dougall- Sides, Leslie;. Horne, William;. Irwin, Rod; Andrews, Wayne; Geer, Jamie; Strong, Steve;. Bates, Dan; Brown, Shelby; Klein,. Sidney; Williams, Dewey; Teunis, Mark;. Steffens, James; Lopez, Perry;. Lopez, Geraldine Campos; Quillen, Michael; Butler, Wayne;. Rickard, Leonard; Soto, Camilo ;. Garriott, Kevin; Delk, Michael;. Clayton, Gina Subject: FW: Mr. Castrogiovanni. Letter #2 Letter sent - see attached - thanks Leslie, Jill and Shelby for your help on this Finance representatives /attorney advised that they will draw up an agreement with Mr. Castrogiovanni that clearly meets expectations outlined by the City - within a reasonable time frame. They also asked for the process line items for demolishing a building. We will provide them with a reasonable time table and steps as requested. Mr. Burdette stated that his client /owner will meet the conditions outlined in the letter but has questions on "Density Rights ".... Thanks to all for your support and interest on these projects - Jeff Subject: Documentl Doci .doc April 21, 2008 Mr. Luke Castrogiovanni 9011 South Natoma Avenue Oak Lawn, Illinois 60453 RE: Follow up to our meeting on March 19, 2008 referencing our Notice of Consequences Stemming From Willful Disregard of Public Nuisance Conditions at the following properties: Clearwater Beachview Resort Albatross Motel Tropicana Resort Motel Bay Lawn Motel Gulf Beach Motel Key Lime Motel Gulf Beach Motel Falcon -Motel Residential Tri -Plex Roma Suites Dear Mr. Castrogiovanni, 325 South Gulfview Avenue 346 Hamden Drive 350 Hamden Drive 406 Hamden Drive 422 Hamden Drive 405 Coronado Drive 419 Coronado Drive 415 Coronado Drive 345 Coronado Drive 326 Coronado Drive Consistent with our letter dated March 19`h. 2008, which was hand delivered to you on said date at a meeting with City Staff, we agreed that all life safety/health/welfare violations shall be brought into compliance no later than April 4, 2008 and all other violations brought into compliance no later than April 20, 2008. We acknowledge that you have made some effort to address a variety of code violations and appreciate your attention to those matters. However, the compliance dates have now lapsed and we find the following issues still outstanding: * Security fencing not installed "Stair Stair railings & bui lding /housing issues * *Clearwater Beachview Resort * Albatross Motel * Tropicana Resort Motel * Bay Lawn Motel * *Gulf Beach Motel * *Gulf Beach Motel * *Falcon Motel 325 South Gulfview Avenue 346 Hamden Drive 350 Hamden Drive 406 Hamden Drive 422 Hamden Drive 419 Coronado Drive 415 Coronado Drive These remaining issues /violations along with others we have discussed, must be brought into compliance immediately. All respective licensing, contractors, permits, inspections, etc. must be adhered to as we monitor your action.plan to bring these matters of mutual concern to closure. Conditions existing at the Baylawn, Tropicana and Albatross Motels are such that we are recommending a demolition schedule within reasonable timelines to be clearly outlined and included as part of your overall properties compliance action plan. Please note that we have passed the threshold of working through "education, communication and cooperation ". Specifically, most of these properties have been vacant /abandoned for months. The quality of life and sense of place for surrounding properties has been negatively impacted by the blighted/deplorable conditions of your properties. Service calls from a variety of City Departments continue'to be taxed as we respond to a wide variety of nuisance related calls (see letter from March 19, 2008). City Code Section 3- 1503.B.2. states: "Buildings which are abandoned, boarded up for a period of six months, partially destroyed for any period of time, or left for a period of three (3) months in a state of partial construction. are declared to be a public nuisance ".. In other words, simply securing and fencing these properties will not prevent the City from continuing with its compliance efforts. The City of Clearwater will continue to move forward with enforcement alternatives to meet all life safety/health/welfare codes /conditions. Notification will be forthcoming as to the violation charges, dates, times, etc. Your immediate and complete response to these issues /violations are key to the legal action either moving forward or stopped as a result of.compliance being met. Sincerely, Jeff Kronschnabl, Director Development & Neighborhood Services City of Clearwater, Florida Cc: I Star Financial See Attachment: Letter from March 19, 2008 PLANNING DEPARTMENT Clint Cuffle Water Resource Associates, Inc. 4260 West Linbaugh Avenue Tampa, FL 33624 • ITY OF C LEARWAT'ER POST OFFICE BOX 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758 -4748 MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562 -4567 FAx (727) 562 -4865 August 21, 2007 RE: Development Order - Case FLD2007 -06020 325 South Gulfview Boulevard, 326, 345, 347 and 353 Coronado Drive and 350 Hamden Drive Dear Mr. Cuffle: This letter constitutes a Development Order pursuant to Section 4- 206.D.6 of the Community Development Code. On August 21, 2007, the Community Development Board reviewed your request for Flexible Development approval in the Tourist District to permit the addition of a Parking Garage and Lot of 377 spaces to Parcel "B" (located between Coronado Drive and Hamden Drive, north of 5th Street) to a previously approved project of 102 attached dwelling units (FLD2005- 02021/TDR2005 -03020 approved by the CDB on July 19, 2005), with reductions to the front (south along 5th Street) setback from 15 feet to 4.4 feet (to screen wall) and to 5.5 feet (to pavement), a reduction to the front (east along Hamden Drive) from 15 feet to 12.7 feet (to building) and an increase to building height from 35 feet to 51.35 feet (to top parking deck), as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2- 803.C, with a reduction to required foundation landscaping on the south side of the parking garage from five to two feet, as a Comprehensive Landscape Program, under the provisions of Section 3- 1202.G. The Community Development Board (CDB) APPROVED the application with the following Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and Conditions of Approval: Findings of Fact: 1. The 2.37 total acres is generally located between S. Gulfview Blvd. and Coronado Dr. west of Brightwater Blvd. (Parcel A), between Coronado Dr. & Hamden Dr. north of 5th St. (Parcel B) and east of Hamden Dr. north of 5th St. (Parcel C); 2. On July 19, 2005, the Community Development Board (CDB) approved with 15 conditions Case Nos. FLD2005- 02021 /TDR2005 -03020 to permit a total of 102 attached dwellings, with 92 dwelling units in a 148 -foot tall building on Parcel A and 10 dwelling units in a 64 -foot tall building on Parcel B, which included the Termination of Status of Nonconformity (equivalent of 119 hotel units [ 116 hotel units and three dwelling units] where 93 hotel units are permitted), the conversion of these hotel units to residential units and the Transfer of Development Rights of 18 hotel units from 401 Coronado Drive and 406 Hamden Drive (donor sites); FRANK HIBBARD, MAYOR JOHN DORAN, COUNCILMEMBER J.B. JOHNSON, COUNCILMEMBER BILL JONSON, COUNCILMEMBER CARLEN A. PETERSEN, COUNCILMEMBER "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER" August 21, 2007 Cuffle — Page 2 3. On August 13, 2007, the Planning Director approved with 13 conditions a Minor Revision, under the provisions of Section 4- 406.A, relocating the 10 dwelling units approved on Parcel B to Parcel A, so that Parcel A will have all 102 dwelling units approved under the original application, and Parcel B will only have accessory parking located on it (the balance between the 187 parking spaces provided on Parcel A and that necessary to provide overall required parking for the 102 dwelling units at a rate of two parking spaces per unit [total of 204 spaces]); 4. The proposal is to add the use of Parking Garage and Lot for 377 spaces to Parcel B (located between Coronado Drive and Hamden Drive, north of 5th Street) to a previously approved project of 102 attached dwelling units (FLD2005- 02021/TDR2005- 03020); 5. Parcel B will provide 17 parking spaces for the attached dwellings on Parcel A; 6. Of the 377 parking spaces being provided on Parcel B, 300 parking spaces are intended to be sold to the City for public parking. Of the remaining 77 parking spaces, 50 spaces will be at ground level and 27 spaces will be on the 6"' floor, all for use by the developer /owner; 7. The proposal includes reductions to the front (south along 5th Street) setback from 15 feet to 4.4 feet (to. screen wall) and to 5.5 feet (to pavement) and a reduction to the front (east along Hamden Drive) from 15 feet to 12.7 feet (to building); 8. Proposed setbacks are consistent with existing setbacks for other projects in close proximity within this urban context; 9. The proposed parking garage building has been designed at a height of 51.35 feet to the highest garage floor from Base Flood Elevation (BFE); 10. The accessory parking garage and attached dwellings originally approved on this Parcel B under FLD2005- 02021/TDR2005 -03020 was to be at a height of 64 feet; 11. The proposed parking garage building height is consistent with the Code and with other projects approved (but yet to be constructed), under construction or already constructed within the surrounding area; 12. Unless the architect can provide documentation at the building permit stage that the stair /elevator towers must exceed the maximum height of 16 feet to the 20 feet proposed, these two towers should be required to be reduced to the maximum height of 16 feet; 13. These overhead utility lines running through the middle of Parcel B will need to be removed to provide for the construction of the parking garage. The overhead lines along the east half of Parcel B on the north side of 5"' Street will also need to be placed underground as part of the construction of this parking garage; 14. While the request has been advertised with a reduction to required interior landscaping from 10 to 3.7 percent, recalculation of the provided interior landscape area indicates 16.7 percent of the vehicular use area; 15. The proposal includes a reduction to required foundation landscaping on the south side of the parking garage from five to two feet, where the two -foot dimension is at the column locations only. The foundation landscape width otherwise is four feet. Proposed site landscaping justifies the requested reduction to the foundation landscape width; and 16. There are current Code Enforcement cases at 325 South Gulfview Boulevard and at 326 Coronado Drive. Conclusions of Law: 1. That the development proposal is consistent with the Standards as per Tables 2 -801.1 and 2 -802 of the Community Development Code; 2. That the development proposal is consistent with the Flexibility criteria as per Section 2 -803.0 of the Community Development Code; August 21, 2007 Cuffle — Page 3 3. That the development proposal is consistent with the General Standards for Level Two Approvals as per Section 3 -913 of the Community Development Code; and 4. That the development proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Landscape Program criteria as per Section 3- 1202.G of the Community Development Code. Conditions of Approval: 1. That approval of this Flexible Development case is subject to the approval of a Development Agreement with the City; 2. That all prior conditions of approval under FLD2005 -02021 by the CDB and under the Minor Revision are still applicable, except as modified through this application approval; 3. That the final design and color of the parking garage building be consistent with the conceptual elevations submitted to, or as modified by, the CDB; 4. That, unless the architect can provide documentation at the building permit stage that the stair /elevator towers must exceed the maximum height of 16 feet to the 20 feet proposed, these two towers be reduced to the maximum height of 16 feet prior to the issuance of the building permit; 5. That a Declaration of Unity of Title (for condominiums) for Parcels A, B and C be recorded in the public records prior to the issuance of any permits; 6. That a condominium plat be recorded prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy; 7. That all utility equipment, including but not limited to wireless communication facilities, electrical and gas meters, etc., be screened from view and/or painted to match the building to which they are attached, as applicable, prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy; 8. That existing overhead utility lines running north/south through Parcel B and along the east half of Parcel B on the north side of 5h Street be placed underground prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy for the parking garage; 9. That any air conditioning unit for the small office on the ground floor be wall mounted and not placed on the outside wall of the parking garage building; 10. That freestanding and attached signage for the parking garage meet the requirements of the Code and any freestanding sign be monument - style, designed to match the exterior materials and color of the parking garage building; 11. That, prior to the issuance of any permit, compliance with all requirements of Stormwater Engineering be met; 12. That all Fire Department requirements be met prior to the issuance of any permits; 13. That any applicable Public Art and Design Impact Fee be paid prior to the issuance of any permits; and 14. That all Parks and Recreation fees be paid prior to the issuance of any permits. Pursuant to Section 4-407, an application for a building permit or other approvals shall be made within one year of Flexible Development approval (August 21, 2008). All required certificates of occupancy shall be obtained within two years of the date of issuance of the building permit. Time frames do not change with successive owners. The Community Development Coordinator may grant an extension of time for a period not to exceed one year and only within the original period of validity. The Community Development Board may approve one additional extension of time after the community development coordinator's extension to initiate a building permit application. August 21, 2007 Cuffle — Page 4 The issuance of this Development Order does not relieve you of the necessity to obtain any building permits or pay any impact fees that may be required. In order to facilitate the issuance of any permit or license affected by this approval, please bring a copy of this letter with you when applying for any permits or licenses that require this prior development approval. Additionally, an appeal of a Level Two approval (Flexible Development) may be initiated pursuant to Section 4 -502.B by the applicant or by any person granted party status within 14 days of the date of the CDB meeting. The filing of an application/notice of appeal shall stay the effect of the decision pending the final determination of the case. The appeal period for your case expires on September 4, 2007 (14 days from the date of the CDB meeting). If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call Wayne M. Wells, Planner III, at 727 -562 -4504. You can access zoning information for parcels within the City through our website: www.myclearwater.com/ og v/depts /planning. Sincerely, Mic ael elk, P Planning Director S: (Planning DepartmentIC D BIFLEX (FLD)IInactive or Finished Applications I Gul/view S 0325 Marbella (T) 2007 - Approve&Gul(view S 325 Development Order 8.21.07.doc FX11 .0 & Wells, Wayne From: Clint Cuffle [ccuffle @wraconsultants.comj Sent: Monday, August 20, 2007 4:40 PM To: Wells, Wayne Cc: jburdette505 @tampabay.rr.com; Bruch, Tracey Subject: RE: FLD2007- 06020, Marbella Parking Garage Wayne, Everybody from our design group has reviewed the staff report and has no objections. We will see you at the meeting tomorrow. Thanks, Clint Cuffle, E.I. Project Engineer Water Resource Associates, Inc. 4260 West Linebaugh Avenue Tampa, FL 33624 Phone: 813 - 265 -3130 Cell: 813- 362 -5088 Fax: 813 - 265 -6610 Web: www.wraconsultants.com - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Wayne. Wells @myClearwater.com [ mailto :Wayne.Wells @myClearwater.com] Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2007 To: Clint Cuffle Cc: jburdette505 @tampabay.rr.com Subject: FLD2007- 06020, Marbella Clint - 10:51 AM Tracey.Bruch @myClearwater.com Parking Garage Attached is the Staff Report for the above referenced application, to be heard by the Community Development Board (CDB) at 1:00 pm on Tuesday, August 21, 2007, in Council Chambers at City Hall, 112 S. Osceola Avenue. If the proposed conditions of approval are acceptable, please let me know by noon on Monday, August 20, 2007, so that I can place this item on the CDB Consent agenda. I have not received any letters of opposition (or support) from the surrounding property owners to this application. Wayne <<Gulfview S 325 Staff Report.doc>> 1 Water Resource A'4S0(IIrES 4260 West Linebaugh Avenue :Tampa, Florida 33624 813- 265 -3130 phone 813= 265 -661_0 fax www.wraconsultants.com Engineering ♦ Planning ♦ Environmental Science LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL TO: Wayne Wells, Planning Department Date: 08 -16-07 City of Clearwater Project: Marabella Parking Garage — Parcel B .100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, Florida 33756 We Transmit: The Following: For Your: Action Neede&Taken: ■ Herewith ❑ Drawings/Prints ■ Use ❑ Your Signature ❑ By Separate Cover ❑ Correspondence ! Review &Comment ❑ Revise & Resubmit ❑ As Requested ❑ Disk(s) A Reference/Files ❑ lCall Upon Receipt ❑ Via Overnight Delivery ■ Other ❑ Please Return ❑ DESCRIPTION (1) Signed and Sealed Civil Plans Please find enclosed, the -above referenced documents for the AMarabella Parking Garage — Parcel B. Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact us at 813 -265 -3130. Thank you Water Reso rce Associates Clint Cuffle Project Engineer 81.3- 265- 31-30 ccuffle @wraconsultants -com ORIGINAL RECENED AUG 17 2001 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2007 10:51 AM To: 'ccuffle @wraconsultants.com' Cc: Joe Burdette (E- mail); Bruch, Tracey Subject: FLD2007- 06020, Marbella Parking Garage Clint - Attached is the Staff Report for the above referenced application, to be heard by the Community Development Board (CDB) at 1:00 pm on Tuesday, August 21, 2007, in Council Chambers at City Hall, 112 S. Osceola Avenue. If the proposed conditions of approval are acceptable, please let me know by noon on Monday, August 20, 2007, so that I can place this item on the CDB Consent agenda. I have not received any letters of opposition (or support) from the surrounding property owners to this application. Wayne Gulfview S 325 Staff Report.do.. Wells, Wayne From: Clint Cuffle [ccuffle @wraconsultants.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2007 9:55 AM To: Wells, Wayne Cc: jburdette505 @tampabay.rr.com Subject: RE: FLD2007- 06020, Marbella Wayne, I will have them overnighted to your attention for tomorrow delivery. Sorry for the inconvenience. Thanks, Clint Cuffle, E.I. Project Engineer Water Resource Associates, Inc. 4260 West Linebaugh Avenue Tampa, FL 33624 Phone: 813 - 265 -3130 Cell: 813 - 362 -5088 Fax: 813 - 265 -6610 Web: www.wraconsultants.com - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Wayne.Wells @myClearwater.com [ mailto :Wayne.Wells @myClearwater.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2007 9:55 AM To: Clint Cuffle Cc: jburdette505 @tampabay.rr.com Subject: FLD2007- 06020, Marbella Clint - I need one signed and sealed civil plans for Parcel B (garage site). None of the 15 sets submitted on August 3, 2007, was signed and sealed. This is not a today thing that I need, but if it can get to me no later than Friday I would appreciate it. Thanks. Wayne 1 Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Monday, August 13, 2007 1:29 PM To: Joe Burdette (E -mail) Cc: Watkins, Sherry; Elliott, Gayle; Delk, Michael Subject: Marbella - Minor Revision Joe - Attached is a Development Order for the Minor Revision to the Marbella project. I am placing the original letter up front at the greeter station in our offices for your pickup (thought you might like to pick it up rather than sending it through the mail). NOW ... I need 15 copies of the revised Minor Revision plans submitted to be collated into the packages for the CDB. These 15 copies I need no later than noon on Wednesday, August 15, 2007. 1 also need someone to come to our offices to collate all the submittals into 15 packages (preferably when the Minor Revision plans are delivered, but no later than Wednesday afternoon), as this was not done previously, and we do not want the responsibility to determine the correctness of information (applicant's responsibility and effort). Other than the Minor Revision plans, -it appears we have everything here, but everything needs to be collated into the packages. We will be happy to provide a location in our offices to collate everything. Call or email me if there are any problems. Wayne Gulfview S 15 Minor Revisic Wells, Wayne From: Delk, Michael Sent: Monday, August 13, 2007 1:43 PM To: Irwin, Rod Cc: Wells, Wayne; Akin, Pam; Brumback, Garry Subject: FW: Marbella - Minor Revision FYI. I send along "FYI" to let you know we've concluded the review /approval of the minor amendment. The garage continues on track (as originally configured) to the August 21 CDB meeting. Michael L. Delk, AICP Planning Director City of Clearwater, Florida myclearwater.com - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Monday, August 13, 2007 1:29 PM To: Joe Burdette (E -mail) Cc: Watkins, Sherry; Elliott, Gayle; Delk, Michael Subject: Marbella - Minor Revision Joe - Attached is a Development Order for the Minor Revision to the Marbella project. I am placing the original letter up front at the greeter station in our offices for your pickup (thought you might like to pick it up rather than sending it through the mail). NOW ... I need 15 copies of the revised Minor Revision plans submitted to be collated into the packages for the CDB. These 15 copies I need no later than noon on Wednesday, August 15, 2007. 1 also need someone to come to our offices to collate all the submittals into 15 packages (preferably when the Minor Revision plans are delivered, but no later than Wednesday afternoon), as this was not done previously, and we do not want the responsibility to determine the correctness of information (applicant's responsibility and effort). Other than the Minor Revision plans, it appears we have everything here, but everything needs to be collated into the packages. We will be happy to provide a location in our offices to collate everything. Call or email me if there are any problems. Wayne Gulfview S :5 Minor Revisic Page 1 of 1 Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Monday, August 06, 2007 2:37 PM To: 'Hunraf @aol.com' Cc: Delk, Michael Subject: Marbella Minor Amendments Joe - _ I am proceeding on the presumption that the plans will be revised according to the comments submitted to you, which will then be reflected into the Parking Garage FLD application. Whatever parking is deficient on Parcel A will be required on Parcel B. There are no changes to the current application as a result of the meeting last Thursday. The earlier in the day on August 10, 2007, (or even earlier in the week) that you submit the revised Minor Revision the better. We are getting pretty close to the deadline. Thanks. Wayne - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Hunraf @aol.com [mailto:Hunraf @aol.com] Sent: Friday, August 03, 2007 10:16 AM To: Wells, Wayne Cc: luke.luccainc@comcast.net Subject: Joe Burdette - Re: Marbella Minor Amendments Wayne Please give me a call about the Marbella minor amendments 458 -4528 It is the current plan to have them to you by next Friday August 10. I hope that will work as we need to stay on the August CDB agenda with the garage project per our meeting yesterday with Pam Akin and Michael. Joe Get a sneak peek of the all -new AOL.com. 8/6/2007 rat , Page 1 of 2 Wells, Wayne From: Clint Cuffle [scuffle @wraconsultants.com] Sent: Friday, August 03, 2007 11:35 AM To: Wells, Wayne Cc: Joseph Cimino Subject: RE: FLD2007- 06020, Marbella Wayne, Just to let you know everything is on its way over to your office. Please let me know if you have any questions with the submitted information. Thanks for your help, Clint Cuffle, E.I. Project Engineer Water Resource Associates, Inc. -,:- -4260 West Linebaugh Avenue Tampa, FL 33624 Phone: 813- 265 -3130 Cell: 813 - 362 -5088 -Fax: 813- 265 -6610 Web: www.wraconsultants.com From: Wayne.Wells @myClearwater.com [ mailto :Wayne.Wells @myClearwater.com] Sent: Thursday, August 02, 2007 5:16 PM To: Clint Cuffle CcOoseph Cimino Subject: RE: FLD2007- 06020, Marbella s�• . Clint 1. The official building height, as advertised, is 51.35 feet (from BFE to top parking deck level). The plans do need to dimension the height of the walls /railings at the top parking level and the height of the stair /elevator towers from the adjacent parking deck (from deck to top of roof). Code only permits a maximum of 16 feet for these towers. 2. The height information is fine. 3. Since there are no perimeter buffers required in the Tourist District, count the landscape area between the parking and the 5th Street ROW and five feet on the east and west sides of the driveways from 5th Street as interior landscaping. See how the numbers work toward the 10% of the vehicular use area. Wayne - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Clint Cuffle [ mailto :ccuffle @wraconsultants.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 01, 2007 4:29 PM To: Wells, Wayne Cc: Joseph Cimino Subject: FLD2007- 06020, Marbella 8/3/2007 rr h Page 2 of 2 Wayne, We have a few outstanding questions we need your input on before finalizing our re- submittal package. Please see below: 1) We are now clear that the official building height per code is measured from the FEMA Elevation of 12' to the highest parking deck. This equals a total building height of 51.35'. We want to make sure that this is the only height we need to reference, and that there is no where in our application or on our plans where we need to reference the actual height from the finished floor to the top of the roof. 2) To address your comment where you had asked about the height of surrounding buildings, we submitted a map showing the number of stories and estimated heights of 18 of the nearest large structures (See Attached). You are still asking for more specific information. Please clarify exactly what you need to address this comment. 3) How do you define Vehicular Use Area Landscaping? I understand that the foundation landscaping on the south side of the building cannot county as VUA landscaping, put do other green strips directly adjacent to the Pavement Count or are we only allowed to count the landscape island. Please let us know on these outstanding issues. Thanks for your help, Clint Cuffle, E.I. Project Engineer Water Resource Associates, Inc. 4260 West Linebaugh Avenue Tampa, FL 33624 Phone: 813- 265 -3130 Cell: 813 - 362 -5088 Fax: 813 - 265 -6610 Web: www.wraconsultants.com 8/3/2007 Page 1 of 2 Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Thursday, August 02, 2007 6:15 PM To: 'Joseph Cimino' Subject: RE: FLD2007- 06020, Marbella It is merely changing the language for the 148'0" height from "midline of roof' to "roof deck ". The roof is a flat roof. The original plans had that as an error. No additional height dimensions needed. Thanks. - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Joseph Cimino [mailto:jcimino @wraconsultants.com] Sent: Thursday, August 02, 2007 6:04 PM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: RE: FLD2007- 06020, Marbella Wayne, Thanks for the reply. One more question regarding the comment I have pasted below: Please also revise 148'0" height for Parcel A Isom "midline of roof" to "roof deck ". The existing approved plans we have from the original permit call out 148'0" from " Midline to Roof' on Parcel A. Do you want us to relable "Midline.to Roof' to "Roof Deck ", or are you actually looking for a different height dimension. If so it may be difficult to dig up that information. Please let me know. Thanks again, Joe Cimino Project Engineer Water Resource Associates, Inc. 4260 West Linebaugh Ave. Tampa, FL 33624 Phone: 813- 265 -3130 Fax: 813- 265 -6610 www.wraconsultants.com From: Wayne.Wells @myClearwater.com [ mailto :Wayne.Wells @myClearwater.com] Sent: Thursday, August 02, 2007 5:16 PM To: Clint Cuffle Cc: Joseph Cimino Subject: RE: FLD2007- 06020, Marbella Clint - 1. The official building height, as advertised, is 51.35 feet (from BFE to top parking deck level). The plans do need to dimension the height of the walls /railings at the top parking level and the height of the stair /elevator towers from the adjacent parking deck (from deck to top of roof). Code only permits a maximum of 16 feet for these towers. 2. The height information is fine. 3. Since there are no perimeter buffers required in the Tourist District, count the landscape area between 8/2/2007 ,� 0 • Page 2 of 2 the parking and the 5th Street ROW and five feet on the east and west sides of the driveways from 5th Street as interior landscaping. See how the numbers work toward the 10% of the vehicular use area. Wayne - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Clint Cuffle [ mailto :ccuffle @wraconsultants.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 01, 2007 4:29 PM To: Wells, Wayne Cc: Joseph Cimino Subject: FLD2007- 06020, Marbella Wayne, We have a few outstanding questions we need your input on before finalizing our re- submittal package. Please see below: 1) We are now clear that the official building height per code is measured from the FEMA Elevation of 12' to the highest parking deck. This equals a total building height of 51.35'. We want to make sure that this is the only height we need to reference, and that there is no where in our application or on our plans where we need to reference the actual height from the finished floor to the top of the roof. 2) To address your comment where you had asked about the height of surrounding buildings, we submitted a map showing the number of stories and estimated heights of 18 of the nearest large structures (See Attached). You are still asking for more specific information. Please clarify exactly what you need to address this comment. 3) How do you define Vehicular Use Area Landscaping? I understand that the foundation landscaping on the south side of the building cannot county as VUA landscaping, put do other green strips directly adjacent to the Pavement Count or are we only allowed to count the landscape island. Please let us know on these outstanding issues. Thanks for your help, Clint Cuffle, E.I. Project Engineer Water Resource Associates, Inc. 4260 West Linebaugh Avenue Tampa, FL 33624 Phone: 813 - 265 -3130 Cell: 813- 362 -5088 Fax: 813 - 265 -6610 Web: www.wraconsultants.com 8/2/2007 Page 1 of 2 Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Thursday, August 02, 2007 5:16 PM To: 'Clint Cuffle' Cc: Joseph Cimino Subject: RE: FLD2007- 06020, Marbella Clint - 1. The official building height, as advertised, is 51.35 feet (from BFE to top parking deck level). The plans do need to dimension the height of the walls /railings at the top parking level and the height of the stair /elevator towers from the adjacent parking deck (from deck to top of roof). Code only permits a maximum of 16 feet for these towers. 2. The height information is fine. 3. Since there are no perimeter buffers required in the Tourist District, count the landscape area between the parking and the 5th Street ROW and five feet on the east and west sides of the driveways from 5th Street as interior landscaping. See how the numbers work toward the 10% of the vehicular use area. Wayne - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Clint Cuffle [mailto:ccuffle @wraconsultants.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 01, 2007 4:29 PM To: Wells, Wayne Cc: Joseph Cimino Subject: FLD2007- 06020, Marbella Wayne, We have a few outstanding questions we need your input on before finalizing our re- submittal package. Please see below: 1) We are now clear that the official building height per code is measured from the FEMA Elevation of 12' to the highest parking deck. This equals a total building height of 51.35'. We want to make sure that this is the only height we need to reference, and that there is no where in our application or on our plans where we -need to reference the actual height from the finished floor to the top of the roof. 2) To address your comment where you had asked about the height of surrounding buildings, we submitted a map showing the number of stories and estimated heights of 18 of the nearest large structures (See Attached). You are still asking for more specific information. Please clarify exactly what you need to address this comment. 3) How do you define Vehicular Use Area Landscaping? I understand that the foundation landscaping on the south side of the building cannot county as VUA landscaping, put do other green strips directly adjacent to the Pavement Count or are we only allowed to count the landscape island. Please let us know on these outstanding issues. Thanks for your help, 8/2/2007 • Page 2 of 2 Clint Cuffle, E.I. Project Engineer Water Resource Associates, Inc. 4260 West Linebaugh Avenue Tampa, FL 33624 Phone: 813- 265 -3130 Cell: 813 - 362 -5088 Fax: 813- 265 -6610 Web: www.wraconsultants.com 8/2/2007 Wells, Wayne From: Joe Burdette Uburdette505 @tampabay.rr.com] Sent: Thursday, August 02, 2007 10:50 AM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: RE: Marbella Minor Revision Wayne 0 Ed Armstrong and I have a meeting with Pam Akin today at 3:30 regarding the development agreement. As that has to go through CDB as well, there is propably no hurry to get the garage on the August CDB agenda, but I want to confirm that with Pam and my client. Will let you know by tomorrow. . - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Wayne. Wells @myClearwater.com ( mailto :Wayne.Wells @myClearwater.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 01, 2007'4:56 PM To: jburdette505 @tampabay.rr.com Cc: Sherry .Watkins @myClearwater.com; neil .thompson @MyClearwater.com;. michael.delk @MyClearwater.com Subject: Marbella Minor Revision Joe - On July 17,2007, you were sent the revised outstanding comments on the Marbella Minor Revision. While I didn't tell you a date specific to have the revisions back into me, I said time was of the essence. The CDB meeting is on August 21, 2007, and time is running out. I will not take this to the CDB if the Minor Revision is not complete and approved (not prior to the CDB, but prior to us sending out the packages with the Staff Reports to the CDB). The revised Minor Revision plans that still must be submitted must be reviewed by the City prior to the issuance of the Minor Revision Development Order. I must, under no circumstances, send the Staff Report for the Marbella parking garage out to the CDB on August 16, 2007. That does not mean that the Minor Revision can be submitted on that date. An alternative is that we postpone /continue the public hearing on the parking garage to the September 18, 2007, CDB meeting. Could you please let me know of the status of when the revised Minor Revision is to be submitted? Wayne � � • Page 1 of 2 Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 2007 6:45 PM To: 'Clint Cuffle' Cc: Joe Burdette (E -mail) Subject: RE: FLD2007- 06020, Marbella Clint - I previously sent to you on July 24th additional comments that needed to be addressed (see attached). Those comments, coupled with the comments below, are the only comments that need to be satisfactorily addressed on revised plans and in application material prior to the CDB meeting. Wayne - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Clint Cuffle [ mailto :ccuffle @wraconsultants.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 2007 3:49 PM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: RE: FLD2007- 06020, Marbella Wayne, I am putting together the revisions to the plans with responses to your comments shown below. I was wondering if there are any other comments that are going to come before the DRC meeting or if this is all of the comments. Let me know if you have any questions. Thanks for your help, Clint Cuffle, E.I. Project Engineer Water Resource Associates, Inc. 4260 West Linebaugh Avenue Tampa, FL 33624 Phone: 813 - 265 -3130 Cell: 813 - 362 -5088 Fax: 813 - 265 -6610 web: www.wraconsultants.com - - - -- Original Message---- - From: wayne.Wells @myClearwater.com [ mailto :Wayne.Wells @myClearwater.com] Sent: Saturday, July 21, 2007 1:20 PM To: Clint Cuffle Cc: jburdette505 @tampabay.rr.com; Sherry .Watkins @myClearwater.com; Leonard .Rickard @myClearwater.com; Steve.Doherty @myClearwater.com Subject: FLD2007- 06020, Marbella Importance: High Clint - The following DRC comments are still not met with the recent submission and must be dealt with immediately (Monday): 7/25/2007 Page 2 of 2 Fire - Lenny Rickard (562 -4327 x3062) 1. Provide Fire Flow Calculations / Water Study by a FIRE PROTECTION ENGINEER to assure an adequate water supply is available and to determine if any upgrades are required by the developer due to the impact of this project. Calculations / Water Study due PRIOR TO CDB . 7/17/2007 Fire Flow Calculations that were submitted were in- complete. Need to resubmit the correct form. The Fire Flow Calculation Form was Faxed to Maria Coffey this date.(JFK) Engineering - Steve Doherty (562 -4773) 1. Handicapped parking space on east side of garage on first floor plan does not meet minimum aisle width requirement of 24 feet. AISLE WIDTH.HAS BEEN PROVIDED BUT 5 7FOOT PEDESTRIAN ACCESS AREA ADJACENT TO PARKING SPACE HAS BEEN DELETED. Zoning - Wayne Wells (562 -4504) 1. 7/21/07 - WW BFE is shown too high on proposed building. If existing site elevations are in the 4 - 5 foot range, and the proposed general elevation on the first floor of the parking garage is 5 -foot, and the BFE is 12 per FEMA, this would mean that the BFE is seven feet above the 111st Floor - Lower Landing" and the Code height would be on the 6th Floor - Upper Landing at 5019 ". Revise all height dimensions. 6/18/07 - WW. Elevation Sheets A2.1 - A2.4 - Provide the height of the building from BFE to the top parking deck level. Additionally, provide the height of the stair /elevator towers from top parking deck level to top of pitched roof (not midpoint of pitched roof) (maximum height of stair /elevator towers is 16 feet from top parking deck level to top of pitched roof). I need the correct height of the building to advertise this request for the CDB on Monday. Please call me, Lenny and Steve on Monday to resolve these issues. There are going to be other changes necessary to the plans, which I will send to you on Monday and where revise application material will be needed later. The additional changes don't affect the advertising of this request. Wayne 7/25/2007 AW Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2007 2:18 PM To: 'ccuffle @wraconsultants.com' Cc: Joe Burdette (E- mail); Thompson, Neil; Watkins, Sherry; Rice, Scott; Bruch, Tracey Subject: FLD2007- 06020, Marbella Clint - The following comments need to be addressed in revised application material (written and /or plans). If you have questions, please call: Landscape - Wayne Wells (562 -4504) 1. Sheet 9 - Provide RI India hawthorn between the sidewalk and the south side of the western stairwell. 2. Sheet 9 - In addition to calling out the number of shrubs and groundcover located in various areas of the site plan, also call out the number and code for trees. 3. Sheet 9 - Please call out the number of VS south of the driveway on the Hamden Drive side of the building. 4. Sheet 9 - To create some uniformity or symmetry of trees around the site, as well as meeting Code requirements (two accent trees (LI & LJ) = one shade tree (MG); three palms (AR) = one shade tree (MG)), please make the following revisions: a. In the NE corner of the site, add one additional LJ to the one shown (to be similar to the' NW corner of the site); b. On the east side of the building south of the driveway, add two LI to the two shown, or plant two palm clusters (similar to west side of building); c. On the south side of the building in the foundation planting area, arrange the LI to be between the columns, in some orderly fashion such as two between one set of columns on both ends with one each between columns in the center of this area; d. Prefer two MG at the SW corner of the site. Suggest relocating the "preserved palm" to the west side of the building (see next comment); e. Add on the west side of the building a palm cluster north of the elevators (may use the relocated "preserved palm" in d above). 5. Sheet 9 - Indicate landscape treatment within the rights -of -way (minimum of sod). 6. Sheet 9 - Remove shrubs /groundcover from sidewalks (NE and NW corners of site) Zoning - Wayne Wells (562 - 4504) 1. 7/21/07 - WW Sheet 6 - Real (Code) height is measured from BFE to the "highest parking deck level" of the garage (Hamden side), not to the "midline of roof' for Parcel B. Please also revise 148'0" height for Parcel A from "midline of roof' to "roof deck ". 6/28/07 - WW Sheet 6 - Revise General Note #7 to the real height for the parking garage. 2. 7/24/07 - WW Based on PDF submitted yesterday, height to 6th floor level is 51.35 feet. Revise all appropriate plans and written material in application. 7/21/07 - WW BFE is shown too high on proposed building. If existing site elevations are in the 4 - 5 foot range, and the proposed general elevation on the first floor of the parking garage is 5 -foot, and the BFE is 12 per FEMA, this would mean that the BFE is seven feet above the "1 st Floor - Lower Landing" and the Code height would be on the 6th Floor - Upper Landing at 50'9 ". Revise all height dimensions. 6/18/07 - WW Elevation Sheets A2.1 - A2.4 - Provide the height of the building from BFE to the top parking deck level. Additionally, provide the height of the stair /elevator towers from top parking deck level to top of pitched roof (not midpoint of pitched roof) (maximum height of stair /elevator towers is 16 feet from top parking deck level to top of pitched roof). 3. 7/21/07 - WW Based on comments on Minor Revision dated 7/16/07, there are only 187 parking spaces provided on Parcel A, not 192. Revise. 6/28/07 - WW Sheet 6 - General Note #19 - Revise Required "Parking Spaces" based on the Minor Revision. 4. 7/21/07 - WW The drawing now shows the gates on this upper level and a turnaround area. Is this turnaround area counted as a parking space? If so, it cannot be and must be revised. 7/3/07 - WW Sheet A1.2 - Since there are 50 private spaces on the ground level and the City is only purchasing 300 parking spaces, this means there are 32 parking spaces on the 6th level that will be private. It is unclear how these 32 spaces will be gated off to prevent the general public from parking within them. There are no gates indicated, which will reduce parking provided due to required 24 -foot backup area for 90- degree parking. Additionally, there should be a turnaround area for the public should all public spaces be full (lose one parking space for the turnaround). This turnaround area must be marked and signed for such outside of the gate. Revise this sheet to show the gates and turnaround. Revise parking counts on Sheets 6 and A0.1. 5. 7/21/07 - WW Al - Revise proposed height to the correct height (see prior comments); A2 - Still looking for an enhanced response with specific information; B1 -Correct the spelling; C - Hours of operation statement unclear. 7/3/07 - WW Revise Attachment B - A. Response to Criteria 1 - 1. Paragraph 2 - Revise the proposed garage height (see prior comments regarding the height from BFE and the height of the towers); 2. Provide the scale /height of this project in relation to other projects (provide specific heights of the surrounding projects); 3. Paragraph 3 - Revise 4th Street to Brightwater Drive; B. Response to Criteria 2 - 1. Revise Gulf Boulevard to S. Gulfview Boulevard; C. Response to Criteria 6 - What are the intended hours of operation of the garage (may need to get from Tracey Bruch). 6. Sheet 6 - Dimension the width of the foundation landscape area along the south side of the building, measured from the curb to the front of the columns. 7. Comprehensive Landscape Program - a. Need to have a narrative that itemizes the reductions to Landscape Code requirements, including the foundation landscaping along the south side of the building (reduction from five to two feet), the reduction to interior landscaping from 10 percent to 3.7 percent of the vehicular use area, .... b. Responses to the criteria must address the reductions requested. 8. Attachment A to Application - Revise #2 Building Height Increase to reflect the height of the parking garage from BFE to the highest parking deck (Hamden side). 9. Sheets 6, 7, 8, 9 and A0.1 - Handicap ramp on the north side of the driveway on Hamden Drive should be similar to those shown at the driveways on 5th Street. Remove the sidewalk extension on this north side of the driveway on Hamden Drive leading up to the building, as it leads into the wall of the building and provides no purpose. Anyone walking along Hamden Drive should access the garage on the south side of the driveway (if they are going to walk up the speed ramp) or on the south side of the garage to access the stairwells. 10. Sheets 6, 7, 8, 9 and A0.1 - Plans should reflect an exit door on the northwest corner of the building (shown on west elevation). 11. Revise Page 1 of the application for the following: a. Revise the Parcel Size (acres and square feet) for Parcel A to 1.41 acres and 61,212 .square feet; and b. Revise the spelling of Tamp to Tampa in the Agent mailing address. 12. Revise Attachment A - A. General Project Description - 1. Paragraph 2 - Revise the building height to reflect the correct height (see prior comments); and B. Building Height Increase - Revise the building height to reflect the correct height (see prior comments). 13. Revise Attachment C - Response to Criteria 3 - Revise Gulf Boulevard S in Paragraph 2 to S. Gulfview Boulevard. 14. Sheets 6, 7, 8, 9 and A0.1 - Provide a handicap ramp in the raised sidewalk east of the handicap space west of the office (to allow exiting to the outside of the parking garage), since there is fencing separating this space and restricting this space from the private parking area to the south. It appears there is no need for a raised sidewalk on the east side of this handicap space (could be striping only on the pavement). Handicap ramp could start at the west edge of the office. 15. Sheets 6, 7, 8, 9 and A0.1 - Sheet A0.1 eliminated the southern door into the office (as discussed at DRC). Revise Sheets 6, 7, 8 and 9 to eliminate this door. Since there is no door at this location, there is no need for a raised sidewalk on the south and west sides of the office (eliminate and stripe out if necessary). 16. Sheets 6, 7, 8 and 9 - Since the driveway on Hamden Drive was widened or repositioned, revise visibility triangle locations. 17. Sheets 6 and A0.1 - Redesign or install safety devices (such as column- mounted mirrors) where handicap motorist is backing blindly out of the public -side van accessible handicap parking space west of the office (due to wall on west side of handicap space). In addition to mirrors to aid motorists backing out of this handicap parking space, a sign must be installed stating "Use column- mounted mirrors when backing" for this handicap parking space. I need one original set of plans and written material (no new original signatures on the application or Affidavit) and 14 copies. If it is easier for you to reproduce the full set of plans and written material and swap it out with what has been already submitted or to swap out portions of plans and written material, whichever works for you. The colored versions of the elevations probably don't need to be redone (unless there have been changes and it is easy for you to produce them). Please also provide a response sheet to these comments. I need these 15 sets of plans and written material as soon as possible but no later than August 3, 2007. Joe - I am still also looking for as part of the packages the approved Minor Revision for Parcel A (don't know the status of those revisions for resubmittal to obtain a Development Order). Wayne f ,, f, � • Page 1 of 1 Wells, Wayne From: Clint Cuffle [ccuffle @wraconsultants.com] Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2007 9:21 AM To: Keller, James; Rickard, Leonard; Wells, Wayne Cc: bhornjak @themurraycompany.com; Cala, Bob Subject: Clearwater Beach Parking Garage Fire Flow Calcs FLD2007 -06020 James, The fire flow calculations for the Clearwater Beach Parking Garage - Marbella are attached. An original signed and sealed copy will be put in the mail. Let me know if you have any questions or need any additional information. Thanks, Clint Cuffle, E.I. Project Engineer Water Resource Associates, Inc. 4260 West Linebaugh Avenue Tampa, FL 33624 Phone: 813 - 265 -3130 Cell: 813- 362 -5088 Fax: 813 - 265 -6610 Web: www.wraconsultants.com 7/24/2007 JULE-FOMMON) 17:33 HAN ' INNOVATIONS (FRX)813jW83F9 P 002/003 r mesour-ow %*Lai 00su Fx - 3'UL-17-2007 03!21P FROM.'Q-WTR FIRE PRUNTN 727-562-4461 Tn.-98132S56610 P.2 Clm,wsbr Me 610 FWWM SUM - Cl&WnW- F-W" 33740 Pumls ion S. Mpft AMM. Gulb 200 - CMMMW. FWO 33768 wbe ww~taaod En ow tsh"IL-Am "AROW*k, ppod mow .r- IMZ �tf> e,,P 7- 9j- i? n A] A LS A brz-r -vim P j I *AWT-M bores c, 12 wJ eot 5 ;P- C&P—AZAAD -I# W.. a Wr.r0-ft suff"'m rr.tes Le"aftv"Wess""va" 4 *AMUR$& ph* 7 Pd 01 -Ow" Men Two x Jr-rqvpw a Pbe P40M ego* pfmwAw MOW P" p"C"aw. 7Sg_om PAWA p —2-0-004 P I#A%APW. ph) S 7-e,,,t w Z LC P P-., 6 a C 7 5o G PM IN t o o F' s T ft T- 7-N We T-01 I-e %J C L JUL:;523- 200?(MON) 17;34 NRN�INNOVRTLONS (FRX)813JM 8329 P 0031003 uui tzi ui u -r:laa r mescurce nssociaLes t o L j -bb iu p.g RL -IT -2807 03:22P FROM:CLWTR FIRE PR NTN 727- 562-4461 TO:M132656618 P.3 a� PO tY.11w..eoie frer■ f■a. r� prl■rfn rN1c.Rrsrt 1. n.w. � IIID7�i1pN �i0� r win t� wfrw■6 29775'BAYHEAD RD Q QE CITY FL 33523 � ►il■r■�f�1slAariNp�Ati�NRM 1[ 1/7A�. I�fllk3l. �■1fF/N tlt�uiMUrq i� wOiri. �` gA1Af!w amataa�ltdarl: s■cldt�atlSirVpr■!t�■�.rdt �... ■ei■ly�r.nt.w+w. nb i�� alrr Irr!■1w1.1 p r�+� •ff■ bpi�tlr W dl��I�MIAFMMdOalfr�drdtU�►. 'ai[lryG�ta k�Odfe■b11■lOd�■atl+rt>, �MMf>kJkAl*Irr war aM M rblWrlR iOPdkMdd MM MM rrn MNIk MMdM■�t r �pg10t mrwwrg�yv*mp np niftOVI"avd 0 "Mae*. {' IMe. Yi�wtdle�a�A ■f�tIM�Mllaip�d�t4lp ii ar9ol�o�fA�R�1lp a iw*w*wQvwfOr*mftwd� /rU1�1ak. *mew blaOl s■oa/IMMd! WA" •' fAS■I■!■�a+w�rrrwe.��■srrwa r. �.�au�o.aroM...rM�wwl�taffyt.ti iwa�ewrrrrr� w■d■�r n.waM �wu.r■ww■ne tarawaisdr■aoa rsdAaeaatw�reags +...ya+rMU.r■m�•�+��+4�oa�.1 t: r • Page I of 1 Wells, Wayne From: Fausel,Rick [rfausel @themurraycompany.com] Sent: Monday, July 23, 2007 3:35 PM To: Wells, Wayne Cc: Clint Cuffle; Cala, Bob; Hornjak, Boris; Hunraf @aol.com Subject: Marabella Parking Garage Wayne, Attached is a revised PDF of A2.1 as you requested. Thank you, Rick J. Fausel Project Manager GMA Design Group Inc. 15500 Lightwave Drive, Suite 100 Clearwater, FL 33760 ph: 727 - 538 -2601 fax: 727 - 538 -2701 7/23/2007 0 • SON OR "Em ROOM W, it ■ure■■uOuu maw move zoom s ■ r OR! wool 10 .0 mono awma OW■ OR W..A Ims! on . ; ■■ ■■01■ son on ■ 1■1 Son! Nunn IM on HIM: X.M! soma MIN mnxmxmn� !!!!go HIN good 1 eN Wille rloe DMWN BY RJF 1991E DATE AFII 24 2001 BHEEf AP.1 10 < R io I— .T- I fn Q —M 110 ST- zxl I.-H; V., CL 10 rloe DMWN BY RJF 1991E DATE AFII 24 2001 BHEEf AP.1 10 - AW, I WAIMAI I' EHB EEI Lou Ffl 1-10 jig CD rzQ JV LL LL 0 E 0 0 ttD rn a —TI ETE—l"I", 4itm 99E�J ,we No DMWN 8Y RA FSHEET A 72?7 �,,--r IV (.)N c V �%l a, �- ill, )v\ ---r • 4 ON c V =A 0, Ell. 0:1 Ki- LL ul LL .6 �saue ogre IMY 62@01 steer A3.2 • • Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Monday, July 23, 2007 9:33 AM To: 'Clint Cuffle' Subject: RE: FLD20O7- 06020, Marbella If you could send me a pdf of Sheet A2.1 with.the revised height, that is all I need at this point for advertising. I will have a number of other items that need to be fixed on the application material and resubmitted, but these other changes don't affect the advertising of the request. I should have this other list to you later today. - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Clint Cuffle [ mailto :ccuffle @wraconsultants..com] Sent: Monday, July 23, 2007 9:25 AM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: RE: FLD2007- 06020, Marbella Wayne, I will have the fire flow calcs to you by noon. what do you need for the height of the building? Do you need revised drawings or just heights? Thanks, Clint Cuffle, E.I. Project Engineer Water Resource Associates, Inc. 4260 West Linebaugh Avenue Tampa, FL 33624 Phone: 813 -265 -3130 Cell: 813- 362 -5088 Fax: 813- 265 -6610 Web: www.wraconsultants.com - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Wayne.Wells @myClearwater.com [ mailto :Wayne.Wells @myClearwater.com] Sent: Monday, July 23, 2007 9:01 AM To: Clint Cuffle Cc: jburdette505 @tampabay.rr.com; Sherry .Watkins @myClearwater.com; Steve.Doherty @myClearwater.com Subject: FLD2007- 06020, Marbella Importance: High Clint - After further discussion with Steve Doherty, please disregard the Engineering comment in my July 21, 2007, email. Please take care of Lenny Rickard's Fire comment and my height issue as soon as possible today, so that I can advertise the request. Wayne 1 0 0 Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Monday, July 23, 2007 9:01 AM To: 'ccuffle @wraconsultants.com' Cc: Joe Burdette (E- mail); Watkins, Sherry; Doherty, Steve Subject: FLD2007- 06020, Marbella Importance: High Clint - After further discussion with Steve Doherty, please disregard the Engineering comment in my July 21, 2007, email. Please take care of Lenny Rickard's Fire comment and my height issue as soon as possible today, so that I can advertise the request. Wayne 1 Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Saturday, July 21, 2007 1:20 PM To: 'ccuffle @wraconsultants.com' Cc: Joe Burdette (E- mail); Watkins, Sherry; Rickard, Leonard; Doherty, Steve Subject: FLD2007- 06020, Marbella Importance: High Clint - The following DRC comments are still not met with the recent submission and must be dealt with immediately (Monday): Fire - Lenny Rickard (562 -4327 x3062) 1. Provide Fire Flow Calculations / Water Study by a FIRE PROTECTION ENGINEER to assure an adequate water supply is available and to determine if any upgrades are required by the developer due to the impact of this project. Calculations / Water Study due PRIOR TO CDB . 7/17/2007 Fire Flow Calculations that were submitted were in- complete. Need to resubmit the correct form. The Fire Flow Calculation Form was Faxed to Maria Coffey this date.(JFK) Engineering - Steve Doherty (562 -4773) 1. Handicapped parking space on east side of garage on first floor plan does not meet minimum aisle width requirement of 24 feet. AISLE WIDTH HAS BEEN PROVIDED BUT 5 -FOOT PEDESTRIAN ACCESS AREA ADJACENT TO PARKING SPACE HAS BEEN DELETED. Zoning - Wayne Wells (562 -4504) 1. 7/21/07 - WW BFE is shown too high on proposed building. If existing site elevations are in the 4 - 5 foot range, and the proposed general elevation on the first floor of the parking garage is 5 -foot, and the BFE is 12 per FEMA, this would mean that the BFE is seven feet above the "1st Floor - Lower Landing" and the Code height would be on the 6th Floor - Upper Landing at 50'9 ". Revise all height dimensions. 6/18/07 - WW Elevation Sheets A2.1 - A2.4 - Provide the height of the building from BFE to the top parking deck level. Additionally, provide the height of the stair /elevator towers from top parking deck level to top of pitched roof (not midpoint of pitched roof) (maximum height of stair /elevator towers is 16 feet from top parking deck level to top of pitched roof). I need the correct height of the building to advertise this request for the CDB on Monday. Please call me, Lenny and Steve on Monday to resolve these issues. There are going to be other changes necessary to the plans, which I will send to you on Monday and where revise application material will be needed later. The additional changes don't affect the advertising of this request. Wayne 0 0 FLD2007 -06020 -- 325 S GULFVIEW BLVD TELEPHONE: No Phone, FAX: No Fax, E -MAIL: No Email Lucca Development Llc 9011 S Natoma Ave Oak Lawn, 11 60453 Owner(s): Lucca Development, Llc 9011 S Natoma Ave Oak Lawn, 11 60453 TELEPHONE: 708 - 430 -0905, FAX: No Fax, E -MAIL: No Email Applicant Clint Cuffle 4260 W. Linebaugh Ave Tampa, FI TELEPHONE: 813 - 265 -3130, FAX: 813 - 265 -6610, E -MAIL: ccuffle @wraconsultants.com Location: 2.37 total acres generally located between S. Gulfview Blvd. and Coronado Dr. west of Brightwater Blvd. (Parcel A), between Coronado Dr. & Hamden Dr. north of 5th St. (Parcel B) and east of Hamden Dr. north of 5th St. (Parcel C). Atlas Page: LINK Zoning District: T, Tourist Request: Flexible Development approval in the Tourist District to permit the addition of a Parking Garage and Lot to Parcel "B" (located between Coronado Drive and Hamden Drive, north of 5th Street) (FLD2005 -02021 /TDR2005 -03020 previously approved by the CDB on July 19, 2005, to permit 102 attached dwellings), with reductions to the front (south along 5th Street) setback from 15 feet to one -foot (to screen wall) and to five feet (to pavement), a reduction to the front (east along Hamden Drive) from 15 feet to 13 feet (to building) and an increase to building height from 35 feet to xx feet (to top parking deck), as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2- 803.C, with a reduction to required interior interior landscaping from 10 to xx percent and a reduction to required foundation landscaping from five to xx feet, as a Comprehensive Landscape Program, under the provisions of Section 3- 1202.G. Proposed Use: Parking garages and lots Neighborhood Association(s): Clearwater Beach Association TELEPHONE: 443 -2168, FAX: No Fax, E -MAIL: papamurphy @aol.com Clearwater, FI 33767 100 Devon Dr Neighborhood Association(s): Clearwater Neighborhoods Coalition TELEPHONE: No Phone, FAX: No Fax, E -MAIL: No Email Clearwater, FI 33758 P O Box 8204 Presenter: Wayne Wells, Planner III Attendees Included: City: Wayne Wells, Neil Thompson, Scott Rice, Steve Doherty, Lenny x � Rickert, Tracy Bruch Applicant: Ed Armstrong, Jayne Sears, Clint Cuffle, �i } s��� JUL 16 2007 CITY Sri. CLE4,MATER 0 i The DRC reviewed this application with the following comments: General Engineering: Development Review Agenda - Thursday, July 5, 2007 - Page 27 The following conditions shall be met prior to review by the Community Development Board: 1. Handicapped parking space on east side of garage on first floor plan does not meet minimum aisle width requirement of 24 feet. RESPONSE: The handicap parking space referenced in Comment 1 has been modified so that it is in compliance with the minimum aisle width of 24'. 2. Sidewalk ramps at street corners shall be constructed per City of Clearwater Contract Specifications and Standards Index #109, pg. 1/3. RESPONSE: A note has been added to the plan indicating that sidewalk ramp configurations are generally located on the construction plans, but must be field constructed to City of Clearwater Standard Index #109. 3. Show on the plan the required sidewalk along Coronado Drive. (Community Development Code Section 3 -1701) RESPONSE: The sidewalk along Coronado Drive has been recently reconstructed by the City. It is shown on the attached plans in its existing condition, and has been called out as existing. 4. Show on the plan the sidewalk along Hamden Drive extended to the north property line. (Community Development Code Section 3 -1701) RESPONSE: The sidewalk along Hamden Drive has been extended to the north property line. The following shall be met prior to issuance of a Building Permit: 1. Show on the plan a sanitary connection to an existing lateral rather than open cutting Hamden drive to connect to a sanitary manhole. RESPONSE: The condition referenced in Comment 1 is acknowledged, and shall be addressed at Building Permit submittal. 2. Provide on the plan a double sweep sanitary cleanout in the right -of -way per City of Clearwater Contract Specifications and Standards Index #305. RESPONSE: The condition referenced in Comment 2 is acknowledged, and shall be addressed at Building Permit submittal. 3. Provide a dimension on the plan indicating that the Fire Department Connection will be installed at least 15 feet from the building. RESPONSE: The condition referenced in Comment 3 is acknowledged, and shall bei��r�, addressed at Building Permit submittal. 6 2007 Cvn&�AAVtiATER 0 4. Indicate on the plan what material the driveways are to be constructed of. If concrete is to be used, include Clearwater Contract Specifications and Standards Index #103, page 2/2. RESPONSE: The condition referenced in Comment 4 is acknowledged, and shall be addressed at Building Permit submittal. 5. Show all city details applicable to this project. The City's Construction Standards and Utility Information can be found on our web site: www.myclearwater.com /gov /depts /pwa /engin /Production /stddet/index.asp . RESPONSE: The condition referenced in Comment 5 is acknowledged, and shall be addressed at Building Permit submittal. General Note: DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review, additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. RESPONSE: Acknowledged. Environmental: 1 . No Issues. RESPONSE: Acknowledged. Fire: 1. Provide Fire Flow Calculations / Water Study by a FIRE PROTECTION ENGINEER to assure an adequate water supply is available and to determine if any upgrades are required by the developer due to the impact of this project. Calculations / Water Study due prior to CDB. RESPONSE: Fire flow calculations are included in Attachment P of these responses. 2. To be addressed for building permit, stairways, exiting to include if an open stairway separation from Parking Garage will be required to include doors. Stairs over 3 stories in height that are open are required to have 48" minimum guardrails with visual protection to prevent vertigo. RESPONSE: See note on Dwg. A0.1 & A2.1. A 48" guardrail conforms to NFPA 101 Life Safety Code Florida 2005 Edition. Harbor Master: 1 . No issues. �- JUL 16 2007 PLANINW-r-., rZF1; y1 N CITY OF CLFWATER RESPONSE: Acknowledged. Legal: 1 . No issues. RESPONSE: Acknowledged. Land Resources: 1 . No Issues. RESPONSE: Acknowledged. Landscaping: Development Review Agenda - Thursday, July 5, 2007 - Page 28 1. Sheet 6 - Relocate the information in the box at the top of the drawing regarding interior landscaping to be part of General Note #19. Recalculate the square footage of interior landscaping. If less than 10 percent of vehicular use area, then must include a reduction request and include in the Comprehensive Landscape Program. RESPONSE: V.U.A. notes and interior landscape calculations have been added to General Not 19. A Comprehensive Landscape Program Application has been included with this submittal (Attachment M). 2. Sheet 6 - There is a five -foot wide foundation landscape area required along the south side of the building, landscaped to meet the requirements of Section 3- 1202.E.2. This area will be measured from the curb to the front of the columns. If proposal is less than the required five -foot area, then it needs to be included in the request as part of a Comprehensive Landscape Program. This foundation landscape area cannot be counted as part of the interior landscape area (if required). Remove diagonal striping from this area. RESPONSE: The foundation landscape area referenced in Comment 2 has does not meet the 5' foundation landscaping criteria from the front of the columns. A Comprehensive Landscape Program Application has been included with this submittal (Attachment M). The diagonal hatching has been removed from the area, and it is no longer counted as interior V.U.A. landscaping. 3. Sheet 9 - Revise the following: a. In lieu of queen palms, utilize sable palms and Washingtonian palms. RESPONSE: Washingtonian Palms have been substituted for all Queen Palm,0jK- NM ji on the Landscape Plan. REctm o JUL 16 2007 i21,ANM*r.- CYA M AEI ' CITY OF CLU WATER b. Eliminate turf on -site and instead plant a tiered type of landscaping on the east, south and west sides (turf may be used in the retention area). Use viburnam instead of silverthorn (less maintenance), with india hawthorne or other shorter plants in front of the viburnam; RESPONSE: Turf has been removed from on -site with the exception of the exterior pond area as shown on the revised plans. A tiered system of shrubs and groundcover have been utilized elsewhere throughout the plan where viburnum has been used in back and india hawthorne in front. C. Unclear if it was intended to specify 4 gallon liriope (normally specified as one gallon); RESPONSE: liriope has been removed from the revised Landscape Plan. HORN d. Utilize the corners of 5th Street and Coronado Drive and 5th Street and Hamden Drive to have a specimen tree (such as Medjool or a salt tolerant shade tree); RESPONSE: The corner of 5th and Hamden has been utilized to plant two magnolias, while the corner of 5th and Coronado has been utilized to plant one magnolia as a salt tolerant shade tree. e. Incorporate other drought and salt tolerant groundcovers in open areas; RESPONSE: As suggested in Comment 3b, viburnum and india hawthorne have been utilized throughout the site plan open areas. Plant crape myrtles in foundation landscape area on south side of garage; RESPONSE: Six (6) Crape Myrtles at 20' o.c. have been added to the foundation landscaping area on the south side of the garage. g. Use of crape myrtles and tree ligustrum in smaller landscape areas and to break up other planting areas acceptable (these are accent trees by our Code); RESPONSE: Acknowledged. h. No Fakahatchee grass shown on plan or specification provided in the schedule; and RESPONSE: Fakahatchee grass is now shown and limited to the exterior stormwater pond area. No turf specified. RESPONSE: Fakahatchee grass is now shown and limited to the exterior stormwater pond area. GI'i n RE-AND JUL 16 2007 P�f i EW CITY OF '1,r'.4L&41-)V ATER Parks and Recreation: 1. Open space /recreation impact fees are due prior to issuance of building permits or final plat (if applicable) whichever occurs first. These fees could be substantial and it is recommended that you contact Art Kader at 727 - 562 -4824 to calculate the assessment. This does not apply to sites less than one acre and we are 0.9 acres. Parks and Recreation: RESPONSE: Acknowledged. Stormwater: The following shall be addressed prior to issuance of building permit. 1. Survey shall include 50' adjacent topo that is north of the north property line. This also include the adjacent structure's finished floor elevation. RESPONSE: The condition referenced in Comment 1 is acknowledged, and shall be addressed at Building Permit submittal. 2. Show a detail of the control structure. RESPONSE: The condition referenced in Comment 2 is acknowledged, and shall be addressed at Building Permit submittal. 3. Survey datum in the bleed down analysis is not consistent. Column E is based on NGVD datum and others based on NAVD88 datum. This is the same with Hydraulic summary. Please revise drainage report accordingly. RESPONSE: The condition referenced in Comment 3 is acknowledged, and shall be addressed at Building Permit submittal. 4. Provide a maintenance schedule for the proposed pond. RESPONSE: The condition referenced in Comment 4 is acknowledged, and shall be addressed at Building Permit submittal. 5. Provide an approved SWFWMD permit. RESPONSE: The condition referenced in Comment 5 is acknowledged, and shall be addressed at Building Permit submittal. 6. Show pipe's type, size, slope, and invert elevations. RESPONSE: The condition referenced in Comment 6 is acknowledged, and shall be addressed at Building Permit submittal. General note: tG- t6if# D JUL 16 2007 P I AN"�4,r' t� ; � �7 , [- NY' CITY OF CLU MIER 1. DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. RESPONSE: Acknowledged 2. At building permit application, applicant shall resubmit all data for review. RESPONSE: Acknowledged Solid Waste: 1. How will solid waste be handled within garage? RESPONSE: Trash receptacles fastened to the concrete deck will be located at each lobby level with a single barrel located at ground level stored at the northeast corner of garage and a pick -up location at curbside. See dwg. A0.1. Traffic Enaineerin 1. All parking stalls shall have 24' wide drive aisle for backing out of a parking stall. Provide this requirement for van accessible parking stall at the southeast corner of ground floor. RESPONSE: The handicap parking space referenced in Comment 1 has been modified so that it is in compliance with the minimum aisle width of 24'. 2. Demonstrate by a turning template how a 17' scaled vehicle can park in the first stall closest to the Fifth Street entrance. RESPONSE: See Attachment Q. 3. Regarding note #18 on page 6, revise to provide a minimum 40 -foot stacking length from back of sidewalk(extended) to gate, ticket dispenser or other control device. RESPONSE: A note has been added to Sheet 6, and the dimensions have been shown. 4. Acknowledge with a note on the site plan indicating that: the minimum vertical height clearance to accommodate van accessible parking shall be a minimum of 8' 2" including entrance, route, stall and exit. The remainder of the garage shall have a minimum vertical clearance of T -0 ". RESPONSE: A stand -alone clearance note stating the condition referenced in Comment 4 has been added to the General Site Plan. 5. Sheet A1.2; direction of travel is reversed on ramp. Please correct. `�°� p40.,, $ RESPONSE: See dwg. A1.3 ECtvw' JUL 16 2007 + tl5t' CIIIYOFCLEF "ihlER i 0 The above to be addressed prior to a Community Development Board (CDB) hearing. General Note(s): 1) Applicant shall comply with the current Transportation Impact Fee Ordinance and fee schedule and paid prior to a Certificate of Occupancy (C.O.). RESPONSE: Acknowledged 2) DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. RESPONSE: Acknowledged Parking Division Comments: Sheet A0.1 1. At entry/exit, sufficient space shall be provided for control equipment. Provide a minimum 6'- 4" wide island at the south exit lane to accommodate future booth unless pay -on -foot system will be used. There is no need to extend islands beyond the east building line. RESPONSE: A 6'4" wide island has been provided at the south exit lane. Islands have been terminated at the building line. 2. Suggest rearrangement of southwest stair /elevator to allow glass- backed elevator to face Coronado Drive. Doors between stairs and lobby and between lobby and garage are not necessary and create security concerns. There is no run of stairs down here as shown on drawings. RESPONSE: The intent of the design of the southwest elevator, lobby and stair configuration is to conform to applicable codes, provide a well balanced exterior elevation composition and allow for an efficient and cost effective construction solution for the elevator core and building structure. With this in mind, the core has remained as originally designed. See dwgs. A0.1, A1.1, A1.2, A1.3. 3. Note - At southeast stair, there is no run of stairs down here as shown on drawings. What is this about? RESPONSE: See dwg. A0.1 4. Office - Eliminate south door, check door swing(s) for exit purposes. RESPONSE: See dwg. A0.1 5. Provide fire exit at northwest corner of building.�� RESPONSE: Not required. Exit access travel distance is unlimited. JUL 16 2007 P1 AN MR3, a � ' Crly0 CLU441 /MER • • Sheet A1.1 6. Same comment as in #2 for doors between lobby and stairs /garage. RESPONSE: See dwg. A1.1 7. Provide floor plan for 2nd level as there is a blend needed at top of ramp from ground level. RESPONSE: See dwg. A1.1 8. On 5th level, eliminate accessible space along west side and gain one regular parking space. RESPONSE: See dwg. A1.2 Sheet A1.2 9. On 6th level, eliminate 2 accessible spaces and gain one space along west side. RESPONSE: See dwg. A1.3 10. Parking spaces on west side of third column from the northeast corner are shown flat, extending over the sloping ramp below. This area of parking will encroach upon the clear height of the ramp below. Check for proper clear height for ramp. RESPONSE: See dwgs. A1.3, A2.3 11. Check exit distance for spaces near northeast corner (dead end spaces) to exit stair. May need stairs here to provide fire exit. RESPONSE: Exit access travel distance is unlimited. 12. Provide door at southeast stair well as weather barrier. RESPONSE: See dwg. A1.3 Sheet A3.1 13. Correct space count. Entrance level contains 50 spaces; Sheet A0.1 shows 40 spaces on this level. RESPONSE: See dwg. A3.1 General 14. Provide open stairwells for security and ventilation purposes. ORIGIA9 , W. RESPONSE: See dwgs. A1.1, A1.2, A1.3-twE JUL 16 2007 PR AW1 k3, CII'y OF CLUA&VIER 15. No material specified. Assume this will be supplied with next submission. Attention to durability is paramount. RESPONSE: See dwgs. A2.1, A2.2, A2.3, A2.4 Planning Comments: 6/18/07 — WW Email dated 6/14/07 modified this condition to show this as the ADDITION of a Parking Garage and Lotto that already approved and the written material needs to reference the 102 attached dwellings on Parcel A. 6/11/07 — WW As a modification to that approved under FLD2005- 02021, the application written material needs to reflect the 92 -unit condominium building on Parcel A, even though it was previously approved and is not proposed to be revised, including responses to General Applicability and Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria (assumed that it is not being revised from that previously approved by the CDB). RESPONSE: The note changes referenced in Comment 1 have been incorporated in to the narrative of Attachment A. 2. Sheet 6 - Revise General Note #7 to the real height for the parking garage. RESPONSE: The real height (77'9" from finished floor to top of the highest hip roof) has been added to General Note 7. 3. Sheet 6 - Revise General Note #19 to reflect both Parcel A and Parcel B site data (need to add Parcel A site data based on the Minor Revision plans). RESPONSE: General Note 19 has been modified to show Parcel A data as well. 4 . Sheet 6 - Remove the Note regarding the Minor Amendment at the bottom of the sheet. RESPONSE: The Note regarding the Minor Amendment has been removed from the bottom of Sheet 6. 5. 6/18/07 — WW OK - WILL COMPLY To be submitted later after Minor Revision completed. 6/11/07 - WW As a modification to that approved under FLD2005- 02021, need the following (one original and 14 copies): a. surveys (boundary, topographic and tree) for Parcels A and C; b. site and landscape plans for the 92 -unit condominium building on Parcel A (may be a copy of what was previously approved by the CDB); �txif� JL .1 6 2'007 P'L ANN,! i-1,17� CITY c. building elevations for the 92 -unit condominium building on Parcel A (may be a copy of what was previously approved by the CDB); d. colored elevation for at least one elevation of the 92 -unit condominium building (may be the same as what was previously approved by the CDB); e. floor plans for the 92 -unit condominium building on Parcel A (may be a copy of what was previously approved by the CDB); f. property deeds for Parcels A and C; g. tree inventory for Parcels A and C (as appropriate); and h. stormwater analysis for Parcel A. All of the above was submitted with the original Marbella Application. Keith Zayac may still have that complete application or Ed Armstrong may have it. We can just get it and make copies. RESPONSE: Acknowledged. Per separate conversation with Wayne Wells this information is not needed at this time. 6. Sheet 6 - a. Revise on the drawing the proposed setback on the north side to the building to the front of the column. RESPONSE: Setback has been shown to front of column. Dimension has been revised to 14.25'. b. Revise General Note #6 for the proposed .north side setback (see above comment); RESPONSE: Setback has been shown to front of column. Dimension has been revised to 14.25'. c. Revise Parcel B south setback to also indicate the setback to pavement. RESPONSE: 5.5' south setback to edge of pavement has been added to the Note 6 Parcel B setbacks. 7. Elevation Sheets A2.1 - A2.4 - Provide the height of the building from BFE to the top parking deck level. Additionally, provide the height of the stair /elevator towers from top parking deck level to top of pitched roof (not midpoint of pitched roof) (maximum height of stair /elevator towers is 16 feet from top parking deck level to top of pitched roof). RESPONSE: See dwgs. A2.1, A2.2, A2.3, A2.4. The base flood elevation (BFE) is noted on drawings as NAVD 88 12' -0 ". 8. Sheet 6 - General Note #19 - Unclear of what the Proposed "3.24" FAR refers to, as a parking garage is not FAR. ;R JUL 16 2007 P! AN',,' RESPONSE: Proposed FAR under note 19 has been changed to N /A. 9. Sheet 6 - General Note #19 - Revise Required "Parking Spaces" based on the Minor Revision. RESPONSE: Parking spaces have been revised to show 377 total in General Note 19. 10. Sheet 6 - There is an inconsistency regarding the lot area for Parcel B between General Note #5 and General Note #19 (Existing and Proposed). Revise to the correct lot area. RESPONSE: The lot area for Parcel B has been corrected in Note 5, and is now consistent with Note 19. 11. Sheet 6 - Revise the Note in the upper right corner for the project name from Marrabella to Marbella. RESPONSE: The note has been revised to show the correct spelling of "Marbella ". 12. Sheets 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, A0.1, A1.1, A1.2, A2.1, A2.2, A2.3, A2.4, A3.1, A3.2, and colored A2.1, A2.2, A2.3 and A2.4 - Revise the name for the project name in the title blocks from " Marrabella" or "Clearwater Beach" to "Marbella ". RESPONSE: See all drawings. 13 . Sheet 4 - Revise title block from "Demolition Plan" to Existing Conditions" (see Sheet 1 Index). RESPONSE: Title block has been changed to "Existing Conditions" match index Sheet. 14. Sheet 6 - Revise General Note #13 from VE to AE flood zone and the elevation to reflect both 12 and 11 (see survey). RESPONSE: Note 13 has been revised to show AE flood zone with both elevations 11' and 12' noted. 15. Sheets A2.1 - A2.4 - Western stair /elevator tower area above the "windows" is taller than the eastern tower and appears out of scale with the eastern tower. Provide justification or reduce height of western tower. RESPONSE: The western stair /elevator tower height design is intended to accommodate the elevator equipment clearance requirement of 15-8" above finished floor. Window and stair wall openings are designed to start at the top of the EIFS trim at 4' -0" above finished floor to provide views from the windows. The space between the window head and the bottom of the eaves is the difference between elevator equipment clearances and the window head. The eastern stair tower has no elevator requirements but we intend to have the same window sill height from finished floor for views; therefore, it is at a lower height. CX11%0111 �11 REC11VVD JUL 16 2007 CI Ty msr .&�ATER 16. Sheet 6 - Demonstrate by a turning template shown on the drawing of how a vehicle can park in the easternmost outside space and that vehicles can make the left turn movement to exit the outside parking area. RESPONSE: See Attachment Q. 17. Sheets 6, 7, 8, 9 and A0.1 - Sheet A0.1 indicates a 30 -inch tall screen wall along the south side of the property. This wall needs to be indicated on Sheets 6, 7, 8 and 9. The location of the wall should rather be placed adjacent to the parking spaces with the landscaping on the outside so the public can enjoy the landscaping, not the vehicles. Suggest rethinking location of the walls toward the intersections of 5th Street with Coronado and Hamden Drives, moving the wall to be closer to the driveways. RESPONSE: The 30" screen wall has been called out on Sheets 6, 7, 8 and 9, and has been reconfigured as suggested in Comment 17. 18. Sheet 6 - Provide the width of sidewalks, both within the rights -of -way and on -site. RESPONSE: All existing and proposed sidewalks have been dimensioned on Sheet 6 of the revised plans 19. Sheet 6 - Provide a dimension from 5th Street to the edge of the parking lot and provide a dimension of the exit driveway width. RESPONSE: A dimension of 12.0' has been added for the width of the exit drive. Dimensions have also been added from the edge of pavement of 5th street to the parking lot area. 20. Sheets 6, 7, 8, 9 and A0.1 - From a pedestrian flow standpoint, the desired flow is to have pedestrians cross Coronado Drive at 5th Street. To that end, a sidewalk should come straight out from the entry doors and the excess concrete sidewalk north of the entry doors should be removed. A sidewalk adjacent to the building five to six feet in width south of the entry doors should be provided to the sidewalk south of the stairs. A landscaped area between the sidewalk coming straight out from the entry doors and the sidewalk on the south side of the stairs can be maintained. The goal is to "funnel" pedestrian traffic to the intersection. RESPONSE: The sidewalk area at the main entrance has been modified as requested in Comment 19 by removing the portion north of the entrance doors, and adding a 5' sidewalk to the south of the entrance. 21. Sheets 6, 7, 8, 9 and A0.1 - Plans indicate through stippling, and by proposed elevations (BC) on Sheet 7, raised concrete areas in various areas of the parking garage. Unclear why these raised concrete areas are designed, rather than keeping these areas level with the parking deck and utilizing paint striping if necessary. This is also assumed to occur on upper levels of the garage also RESPONSE: The ground floor has been revised so that raised concrete curbs are limited only to areas that abut entrance and stairwell vestibules, as well as the divider medians at the main entrance off of Hamden Drive. q kr !°JL 16 2007 � .%I ."F A q 'I It CIS"' �JF CLUON11 E? r 22. Condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: That a Declaration of Unity of Title (for condominiums) be recorded prior to the issuance of any permits tying k13RA ;i!11p:(1L Parcels A, B and C together. REC6:110@ RESPONSE: Acknowledged 23. Sheet A0.1 - Based on 382 total spaces, only eight handicap spaces required. RESPONSE: Please note, there is a slight adjustment to 377 total spaces due to coordination of patterns of circulation and location of gates on the 6th level. See Floor Plans for changes. 2007 24. Sheet 6 - Based on this sheet showing 12 -inch E.I.F.S. on east and west sides of the southeast portion of the garage, revise proposed setbacks on west side to 14 feet (provide dimension at this location and change General Note #6). RESPONSE: After incorporating the E.I.F.S. on the south east and southwest sides of the building. The west setback is maintained at 15' and the east setback has been revised to 12.7'. The modification has been dimensioned and the General Notes have been changed on Sheet 6. 25. Sheet 6, 7, 8, 9 and A0.1 - Unclear how handicap space in southeast corner has an accessible path that doesn't go behind other vehicles and due to raised curb. Revise /advise. RESPONSE: See dwg. A0.1 26. Sheet 7 and A0.1 - Unclear how drainage pond extends under ramp if north wall goes to the ground (see A2.3).- Explain RESPONSE: North wall does not go to the ground along the ramp section. Instead, a fence system will be provided, and is called out on the plans, to ensure access to the interior pond area by authorized personnel only. 27. It has been my understanding that the parking on the ground floor accessed from 5th Street will be private parking and gated, but no gates are shown. Show gate locations. Explain. RESPONSE: Ground floor parking access from 5th Street will not be gated. See dwg. A0.1 Note #1. Signs will include a towing warning. 28. Sheet 6 - Provide length of parking spaces on west side (should be 18 feet from face of center column per Sheets A0.1, A1.1 and A1.2). RESPONSE: Parking spaces along the west side of the garage measure 18' in length from the interior face of the column. This dimension has been called out on Sheet 6 of the revised plans. 29. Sheet A0.1 - Since an office area with restroom is being provided on the ground floor (below BFE), this room must be flood proofed. Remove notes indicating flood vents. 9 0 RESPONSE: See dwg. A0.1 Note # 2. 30. Sheet A1.2 - Since there are 50 private spaces on the ground level and the City is only purchasing 300 parking spaces, this means there are 32 parking spaces on the 61n level that will be private. It is unclear how these 32 spaces will be gated off to prevent the general public from parking within them. There are no gates indicated, which will reduce parking provided due to required 24 -foot backup area for 90- degree parking. Additionally, there should be a turnaround area for the public should all public spaces be full (lose one parking space for the turnaround). This turnaround area must be marked and signed for such outside of the gate. Revise this sheet to show the gates and turnaround. Revise parking counts on Sheets 6 and A0.1. RESPONSE: See dwg. A1.3 and Sheet 6. 31. Sheet A2.2 - Revise spelling of Coronado below the elevation. RESPONSE: See Drawings 32. Sheet A2.4 - Revise Hamden Street to Hamden Drive under the elevation. RESPONSE: See Drawings 33. Sheet A3.1 - This drawing indicates floor to floor dimensions, but does not take into account the double tees depth when indicating actual height clearance for vehicles, especially for ADA. Revise to provide additional dimensions that would account for the depth of the double tees to reflect the actual clearances. RESPONSE: See dwg. A3.1 34. Sheet AM - Provide a dimension that adequate clearance is provided between the fifth level ramp and the bottom edge of the structure for parking on the west side of the sixth level. RESPONSE: See dwg. A3.1 35. Sheet A3.2 - Revise the spelling of "Coronado" and change Street to Drive and revise Hamden Street to Hamden Drive. RESPONSE: See dwg. A3.2 36. Sheet A3.2 - These line of sight drawings indicate a full wall and indicates "painted aluminum mullions screening ". However, there is only a single, center column, which is not clearly drawn and would not have any opening. The drawings should show the structural floor with the solid railing and it open otherwise. The "painted aluminum mullions screening" only occur at certain locations and aren't any deeper than the solid railing. Suggest removing the "painted aluminum mullions screening" verbiage. RESPONSE: See dwg. A3.2 d IElY1 RRIPAD JUL 16 2007 CITY CE CE Ewz?�?� LATER • 0 37. Sheet A3.2 - Unclear why a 100 -foot distance was used for both drawings. Right -of way width for Coronado Drive is 60 feet. Adding a 15 -foot setback for the garage only provides a 75 -foot dimension from the other side of Coronado Drive. For Hamden Drive, also with a 60 -foot right -of -way, even adding the 13 -foot setback, the 100 -foot sight distance would place the pedestrian in the water. Suggest redrawing using a more realistic sight line dimension that the public would actually see. RESPONSE: See dwg. A3.2 38. Elevations (black and white AND colored) - Need a legend with what the color names are. Also, provide color samples /chips for the proposed exterior colors (one copy). RESPONSE: See elevations drawings, colored elevation drawings and color board. 39. Revise Page 1 of the application for the following: a. Project Name: Marbella Parking Garage - Parcel B; b. Parcel Size (acres and square feet) to reflect Parcels A, B and C; c. Parcel Numbers: Parcel A: 07/29/15/52380/000 /0630 and 07/29/15/52380/000 /1110; Parcels B and C: 08/29/15/17586/001 /0120, 08/29/15/17586/001/0130, 08/29/15/17586/001/0140, 08/29/15/17604/000 /0080 and 08/29/15/17604/000 /0100; d. Add to the Agent Name the city, state and. zip code for Water Resource Associates, Inc.; and e. Street Addresses: Parcel A: 325 S. Gulfview Blvd. and 326 Coronado Dr.; Parcel B: 345, 347 and 353 Coronado Dr. and 346 and 350 Hamden Dr. RESPONSE: Project name has been revised. Addresses and Parcel IDs have been compiled in a separate Attachment (See Attachment M). 40. Attachments to application - Revise project name to Marbella. RESPONSE: The project name has been corrected on all Attachments. 41. Revise Attachment A. A. General Project Description 1. Paragraph 1 - Revise the number of dwellings on Parcel A from 91 units to 92 units; RESPONSE: Paragraph 1 on Attachment A has been revised for clarification as per comment A.1. 0-IMO II-141 RECINAD ` ,, 16 2007 pl<ANG° i CIly C)F CLEi�.N JA TER 0 6 2. Paragraph 2 - A Minor Revision to the original approved project relocated the 10 units on Parcel B to Parcel A. This proposal is not the replacement of the 10 units on Parcel B, but the ADDITION of a Parking Garage and Lot to the approved project of 102 dwelling units on Parcel A RESPONSE: Paragraph 2 on Attachment A has been revised for clarification as per comment A.2. 3. Paragraph 2 - Revise the height of the parking garage; RESPONSE: The height has been corrected in Paragraph 2 in Attachment A. B. Building Height Increase - Revise to actual height; RESPONSE: The height has been corrected in Paragraph 2 in Attachment A. Qkilc x.041 C. Setback Reductions 2007 1. Front (5th Street) - Add the setback to pavement; RESPONSE: A setback of 5.5' to pavement has been added to Attachment A. '` "�t r'40141A,IER The wall has been modified, therefore a revised setback to the screen wall has also been added to Attachment A. 2. Add Front (Coronado Dr) - Add 14 feet to building. RESPONSE: The plan has been modified and corrected such that the setback along Coronado remains at 15', while the setback on Hamden has been revised to 12.7'. 42. Revise Attachment B. A. Response to Criteria 1 1. Paragraph 2 - Revise the proposed garage height (see prior comments regarding the height from BFE and the height of the towers); RESPONSE: The previous height note have been left on Attachment B, however, it has been noted that the maximum building height, measured from the top of the highest hip roof, is 65'9" above the FEMA AE Zone (EL =12.0' NAVD 88) and 77'9" above the proposed finished floor elevation. 2. Provide the scale /height of this project in relation to other projects (provide specific heights of the surrounding projects); does this mean existing projects or approved projects? RESPONSE: This is a general statement regarding existing project. Please see Attachment O for approximate heights of surrounding buildings between the proposed project site and the beachfront development. 3. Paragraph 3 - Revise 4th Street to Brightwater Drive RESPONSE: 4th Street has been revised to Brightwater Drive B. Response to Criteria 2 1. Revise Gulf Boulevard to S. Gulfview Boulevard; RESPONSE: Gulf Boulevard has been Revised to Gulf Boulevard S. C. Response to Criteria 6 - What are the intended hours of operation of the garage (may need to get from Tracey Bruch). RESPONSE: Actual hours of operation will be determined though coordination between the owner and City staff. 43. Revise Attachment C A. Response to Criteria 1 - Need to include a response to an increase to building height; RESPONSE: Building height has been addressed under Criteria 1. B. Response to Criteria 3 - Need to discuss surrounding approved and /or constructed redevelopment projects as to how this proposal will not impede redevelopment of the area; RESPONSE: See revisions to Criteria 3. C. Response to Criteria 6 - Third paragraph - Revise 4th Street to Brightwater Drive. RESPONSE: 4th Street has been revised to Brightwater Drive 44. Revise Attachment G for the name of the project to Marbella Parking Garage. RESPONSE: Attachment G has been revised to show "Marbella Parking Garage" 45. Revise Attachment I for the name of the project to Marbella Parking Garage. RESPONSE: Attachment I has been revised to show "Marbella Parking Garage" 46. Revise Attachment J for the name of the project to Marbella Parking Garage. RESPONSE: Attachment J has been revised to show "Marbella Parking Garage" 47. Update Attachment K and L with the revised plans. RESPONSE: Attachments K and L have been updated with the revised plans. RECtI 0 !UL 16 2007 PLAN %% �= t CITY o- CLUMM ER Water Resource I S S 0 ( I A T I S 4260 West Linebaugh Avenue Tampa, Florida 33624 813- 265 -3130 phone 813 - 265 -6610 fax www.wraconsultants.com Engineering ♦ Planning ♦ Environmental Science LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL TO: Wayne Wells, Planning Department Date: 07116107 City of Clearwater Project. Marabella Parking Garage — Parcel B 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, Florida 33756 We Transmit. The Following. ■ Herewith ❑ Drawings/Prints ❑ By Separate Cover ❑ Correspondence ❑ As Requested ❑ Disk(s) ❑ Via Overnight Delivery ■ Other For Your. ■ Use ■ Review &Comment ■ Reference /Files ❑ Please Return Action Needed/Taken: ❑ Your Signature ❑ Revise & Resubmit ❑ Call Upon Receipt Please find enclosed, the above referenced documents for the Marabella Parking Garage — Parcel B. Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact us at 813 - 265 -3130. Thank youLce W - Water Resoci ates Clint Cuffle Project Engineer 813- 265 -3130 ccuffle @wraconsultants.com R". 1 D JUL 16 2007 PLAN CITE' OF C00VATER DESCRIPTION 15 Flexible Development / Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project Applications with Attachments 15 Civil Site Drawings for Parking Garage 15 Tree/Topographic/Boundary Survey for Project Site 15 Architectural Site Plans and Details 9 Full Scale Color Rendering of Parking Garage 1 Parking Garage Color Template for Wayne Wells Please find enclosed, the above referenced documents for the Marabella Parking Garage — Parcel B. Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact us at 813 - 265 -3130. Thank youLce W - Water Resoci ates Clint Cuffle Project Engineer 813- 265 -3130 ccuffle @wraconsultants.com R". 1 D JUL 16 2007 PLAN CITE' OF C00VATER Pagel of 2 Wells, Wayne From: Cala, Bob [bcala @gmadesign.com] Sent: Thursday; July 12, 2007 12:26 PM To: Bruch, Tracey Cc: JEbert @timhaahs.com; Rice, Scott; Wells, Wayne; rvalera @timhaahs.com; Hunraf @aol.com; Hornjak, Boris Subject: RE: Marbella Parking Garage Tracey, Thanks for getting back to me. I want to let you know our schedule. In order to meet the resubmittal date, we have completed our revisions and responses to the drawings and have completed printing of the drawings today. In order to allow for us to coordinate with you and Jim as the project moves forward, I have noted on the drawings " All equipment is shown schematically and that final equipment selection and location is to be included in the construction document phase of the project ". I hope this is satisfactory since the time to complete the resubmittal is so short. Once we meet this deadline, I will forward a file to Jim. Thanks, I- Robert A. Cala AIA GMA Design Group, Inc. From: Tracey.Bruch @myClearwater.com [ mailto :Tracey.Bruch @myClearwater.com] Sent: Thursday, July 12, 2007 10:40 AM To: Cala, Bob Cc: JEbert@timhaahs.com; Scott.Rice @myClearwater.com; Wayne.Wells @myClearwater.com; rvalera @timhaahs.com Subject: RE: Marbella Parking Garage Bob: We will work to get you this info -- can you please send Jim Ebert a .dwg file of the ground floor plan and he will locate the equip. Thanks, Tracey Tracey Bruch, CAPP Parking Manager 7/12/2007 1 V 0 • Page 2 of 2 (727) 562 -4771 tracey.bruch @myclearwater.com - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Cala, Bob [mailto:bcala @gmadesign.com] Sent: Monday, July 09, 2007 4:39 PM To: Bruch, Tracey Cc: Hornjak, Boris; ccuffle @wraconsultants.com; Fausel,Rick Subject: Marbella Parking Garage Tracey, We are working on the revisions to the documents and would like to include parking equipment locations per Clearwater standards. Please advise where this information may be obtained. Thanks, i••, Robert A. Cala AIA GMA Design Group, Inc. 7/12/2007 0 . Page 1 of 1 Wells, Wayne From: Ehooper1 @ aol.com Sent: Monday, July 09, 2007 6:50 PM To: Wells, Wayne Cc: Hunraf @aol.com Subject: Marbella submission Wayne, Thank you for your return call today concerning the Marbella submission after the previous DRC meeting. As I understand our conversation, the minor revision is not yet approved and we are submitting one original and copies of the parcel B plan as is being requested. There may be a date in the future that a complete package that includes parcel A, B, And C could be required, but that will not affect the July 16th submittal timeframe. Thank you again for your timely response and if I have misunderstood any part of our discussion, please respond via email to the parties listed above. Ed Hooper See what's free at AOL.com. 7/12/2007 i t Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Thursday, July 05, 2007 10:03 AM To: 'Joe Burdette' Subject: RE: FLD2007- 06020, Marbella - Joe Burdette Joe - I think you make this requirement out to be more than it is. Mr. Armstrong on other condominium projects raised this same issue and created, acceptable to the City Attorney's office, a Declaration of Unity of Title for condominium projects. This new.document is being used for other condominium projects and can be used for this project. Wayne - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Joe Burdette [ mailto :jburdette505@tampabay.rr.comI Sent: Thursday, July 05, 2007 9:41 AM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: RE: FLD2007- 06020, Marbella - Joe Burdette Wayne I will not be at DRC today for this project, but Ed Hooper will. There is one issue that we will not be able to deal with and that is the Unity of Title. We discussed this early on with Pam Akin.and Ed Armstrong and they agreed that it is complicated since we have to condominium the garage. It was decided that was an issue that they would need to deal with in the Deveopment Agreement and so I think we all need to let the lawyers figure that one out and it not be a part of this approval. Maybe you could give Pam a call and discuss it. Joe - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Wayne.Wells@myClearwater.com [ mailto :Wayne.Wells@myClearwater.com] Sent: Tuesday, July 03, 2007 3:11 PM To: ccuffle@wraconsultants.com Cc: jburdette505@tampabay.rr.com; Tracey.Bruch@myClearwater.com Subject: FLD2007- 06020, Marbella Clint - Finally, attached is the Draft July 5, 2007, DRC comments for the above referenced project. The meeting will be held at 1:00 pm in our offices. Wayne <<draft 7.5.07 dre action agenda.pdf>> 1 Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Tuesday, July 03, 2007 4:11 PM To: 'ccuffle @wraconsultants.com' Cc: Joe Burdette (E- mail); Bruch, Tracey Subject: FLD2007- 06020, Marbella Clint - Finally, attached is the Draft July 5, 2007, DRC comments for the above referenced project.. The meeting will be held at 1:00 pm in our offices. Wayne nu draft 7.5.07 dre action agenda... r, 0 Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Monday, June 18, 2007 5:36 PM To: 'ccuffle @wraconsultants.com' Cc: Joe Burdette (E -mail) Subject: FLD2007- 06020, Marbella Clint - Attached is a Letter of Completeness for the above referenced project. The original letter is being mailed. Wayne letter of mpleteness 6.18.07 1 40 CITY OF CLEA.RWATER ° Clearwater > ea PLANNING DEPARTMENT MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING 0 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE: (727) 562 -4567 FAX: (727) 562 -4576 W W W.MYCLEARWATER. COM June 18, 2007 Clint Cuffle 4260 W. Linebaugh Ave Tampa, Fl VIA FAX: 813 - 265 -6610 RE: FLD2007 -06020 -- 325 S GULFVIEW BLVD -- Letter of Completeness Dear Clint Cuffle : The Planning Staff has entered your application into the Department's filing system and assigned the case number: FLD2007- 06020. After a preliminary review of the submitted documents, staff has determined that the application is complete. The Development Review Committee (DRC) will review the application for sufficiency on July 05, 2007, in the Planning Department conference room - Room 216 - on the second floor of the Municipal Services Building. The building is located at 100 South Myrtle Avenue in downtown Clearwater. You will be contacted by the Planning Department's Administrative Analyst within one week prior to the meeting date for the approximate time that your case will be reviewed. You or your representative (as applicable) must be present to answer any questions that the DRC may have regarding your application. Additional comments may be generated by the DRC at the time of the meeting. If you have any questions, please do not, hesitate to contact me at 727 -562 -4504 or Wayne.Wells@myclearwater.com. Sincerely yours, 9 �-L" Wayne ells, AICP Planner III Letter of Completeness - FLD2007 -06020 - 325 S GULMEW BLVD Water Rmur(e l( S 0( I I T( T June 15, 2007. Wayne Wells, Planner City of Clearwater Planning Department 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, FL 33756 4260 West Linebaugh Ave. Tampa, Florida 33624 813 - 265 -3130 phone 813 - 265 -6610 fax www.wraconsultants.com The Planning Staff has entered your application into the Department's filing system and assigned the case number: FLD2007- 06020. After a preliminary review of the submitted documents, staff has determined that the application is Incomplete with the following comments. 1. Based on Attachment A, this proposal is a modification to Case FLD2005- 02021, where the 10 -unit condominium building approved for Parcel B is to be replaced with a six -story parking garage. Please confirm that the overall revised Marbella (or Marrabella, spelling unclear) project will be only 92 dwelling units with this application (not 102 dwelling units). 2 RESPONSE: The developer's respresentative, Joe Burdette, has spoken to you regarding this issue and is taken care of it with you directly. As a modification to that approved under FLD2005- 02021, need the following (one original and 14 copies): a. surveys (boundary, topographic and tree) for Parcels A and C; b. site and landscape plans for the 92 -unit condominium building on Parcel A (may be a copy of what was previously approved by the CDB); c. building elevations for the 92 -unit condominium building on Parcel A (may be a copy of what was previously approved by the CDB); d. colored elevation for at least one elevation of the 92 -unit condominium building (may be the same as what was previously approved by the CDB); e.floor plans for the 92 -unit condominium building on Parcel A (may be a copy of what was previously approved by the CDB); f. property deeds for Parcels A and C; g.tree inventory for Parcels A and C (as appropriate); and h. stormwater analysis for Parcel A. PLANNING DE'PARTMM I CITY OF CLEARWATER ORIGINAL RECEIVED A 15 7007 RESPONSE: The developer's respresentative, Joe Burdette, has spoken to you regarding this issue and is taken care of it with you directly. 3. As a modification to that approved under FLD2005- 02021, the application written material needs to reflect the 92 -unit condominium building on Parcel A, even though it was previously approved and is not proposed to be revised, including responses to xaaT J General Applicability and C prehensive Infll Redevelopment Projec itena (assumed that it is not beinisvised from that previously approved b CDB). RESPONSE: The developer's respresentative, Joe Burdette, has spoken to you regarding this issue and is taken care of it with you directly. 4. If this application is modifying what was originally approved under FLD2005- 02021, where the 10 dwelling units on Parcel B are being dropped, then it is presumed that the Transfer of Development Rights (TDR) is also being modified. Provide revised application and information required by application. RESPONSE: The developer's respresentative, Joe Burdette, has spoken to you regarding this issue and is taken care of it with you directly. 5. Based on this application modifying that previously approved under FLD2005- 02021, the site data must be revised to reflect this change in number of dwelling unit, parking, etc. RESPONSE: The site data table located on the General Site Plan (Sheet 6) has been revised according to the comment above. 15 additional copies of the General Site Plan are included in this re- submittal. 6. The survey submitted as Attachment H is intended as a tree survey. The survey, however, does not indicate the tree numbers that the tree inventory (Attachment 1) indicates (tree # 7 -25). Revise to indicate the tree number on the survey (so it will correlate with the inventory). RESPONSE: Per phone conversation with Rick Albee on June 15th, 2007, he has all of the tree inventory information that he needs in order to review the application. He said that he has contacted you and this comment should be taken care of. 7. Sight triangles, while shown on Sheets 6 - 9, are incorrectly shown locationally on Hamden Drive. Sight triangles must be shown along the property line and the edge of the driveway. RESPONSE: All sight triangles shown on Hamden Drive have been revised to be located properly along the property line and edge of driveway. 15 additional copies of Sheets 6 -9 are included in this re- submittal package. 8. Sheet 6 - Provide the angle of the angled spaces along the south property line. RESPONSE: The angle on the proposed angled spaces has been ORIGINAL added to the General Site Plan (Sheet 6). 15 additional copies of the RECEIVED General Site Plan are included in this re- submittal. - -A 15 2007 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER 2 wm� I r 9. Depict by shading or crossing of all required parking lot interior Ilescaped areas (10 percent of the vehicular use area [VUA] for only the open parking area outside of the parking garage). If less than 4,000 square feet of VUA, then interior landscaping is not required. Provide the square footage of the VUA for only the open parking area outside of the parking garage on Sheet 6. RESPONSE: The proposed vehicle use area outside the garage totals 5,500 square feet so parking lot interior landscaping is required. The parking lot interior landscaping adds up to 600 square feet so it meets the 10 percent landscape criteria for vehicle use areas. The hatched vehicle use areas outside of the garage with additional notes have been included on the General Site Plan (Sheet 6) while the proposed landscaping in these areas are provided on the Landscape Plan (Sheet 9). If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at 813 - 265 -3130 or ccuffle @wraconsultants.com. Thanks for your help, 0-1 Clint Cuffle, E.I. Project Engineer ORIGINAL RECEIVED AN 15 2007 PLANNING DEFARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER 3 ' i xaa�a Water Resource A S S 0[ I A T f S 4260 West Linebaugh Avenue Tampa, Florida 33624 813- 265 -3130 phone 813 - 265 -6610 fax www.wraconsultants.com Engineering ♦ Planning LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL Environmental Science TO: Way ne Wells, Planner III Date: 06115107 City of Clearwater Project. Marrabella Parking Garage — Parcel B 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, Florida 33756 We Transmit: The Following: For Four: Action Neede&Taken: ■ Herewith ❑ Drawings/Prints ■ Use ❑ Your Signature ❑ By Separate Cover ❑ Correspondence ■ Review &Comment ❑ Revise & Resubmit ❑ As Requested ❑ Disk(s) ■ Reference/Files ❑ Call Upon Receipt ❑ Via Overnight Delivery ■ Other ❑ Please Return ❑ DESCRIPTION (15) Signed and Sealed Revised Sheets 6 — 9 (5) Responses to Comments Please find enclosed, the above referenced documents for the resubmittal of the Marrabella Parking Garage — Parcel B. Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact us at 813 - 265 -3130. Thank you, Wat?Reso Frce As sociates Clint Cuffle Project Engineer 813- 265 -3130 ccuffle@wraconsultants.com ORIGINAL. RECEIVED ".r f 2007 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER 00101NA , RFCgypo .;1 � 6'J 0 2007 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER • Page 1 of 1 Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Monday, June 18, 2007 7:23 AM To: 'Hunraf @aol.com' Subject: RE: Joe Burdette - Re Garage Joe - I understand and concur. The garage is on Parcel B. Wayne , - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Hunraf @aol.com [mailto:Hunraf @aol.com] Sent: Saturday, June 16, 2007 8:08 AM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: Joe Burdette - Re Garage Wayne We resubmitted the Marbella Garage on Friday. I left you a message on your phone on Friday, but just to be clear as to what I was saying I wanted to write it down. The only question we had a problem with was the one regarding parking count on the site data table. Until I have the comments addressed on the minor amendment for Marbella (Parcel A), I am not exactly sure how many spots will be left on Parcel A. I know there will not be 204, so what ever I need from Parcel C to count towards Parcel A will be answered by the 25th when I resubmit Parcel A. There are more than enough spots on Parcel C (83) to cover the requirement for Parcel A, I just am not exactly sure how many of the 83 I will need. I hope that makes sense. So the answer is we will all know on the 25th when I have an exact count on Parcel A. Give me a call on if you have any questions or there is a problem with this Joe See what's free at AOL.com. 6/18/2007 • • Wells, Wayne From: Joe Burdette Uburdette505 @tampabay.rr.com] Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2007 12:42 PM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: RE: Marbella Wayne Let me check on this and will get back to you today. Joe - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Wayne. Wells @myClearwater.com [ mailto :Wayne.Wells @myClearwater.com] Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2007 8:09 AM To: jburdette505 @tampabay.rr.com Cc: michael.delk @MyClearwater.com Subject: Marbella Joe - On April 19, 2007, I emailed the comments needing,to be addressed for the Minor Revision for the Marbella project. As the parking garage has been moving along, which I understand may be submitted on or before this Friday, we have not approved the Minor Revision. At this point, Parcel B, where the parking garage is proposed, still is approved with 10 dwelling units on it with an accessory parking garage. Do you know the status of the revisions for the Minor Revision? Please note, the parking garage project will not be found sufficient to move forward to the CDB until the Minor Revision is approved. It is still unclear how many parking spaces for the Marbella attached dwellings will be necessary to be placed on this Parcel B where the parking garage is proposed. Could you please help getting this Minor Revision moving and re- submitted? Wayne 1 � � • Page 1 of 3 Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Friday, June 15, 2007 11:04 AM To: 'Tim' Subject: RE: Joe Burdette - Re: Marbella Garage DRC Application Comments Yes, that would be appreciated. On a different subject, could you check with Joe or whomever as to the spelling of the project, because I have seen it two ways: Marbella or Marrabella. I really don't care which one. The owner /applicant may care. Thanks. - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Tim [mailto:tim @groundfl.com] Sent: Friday, June 15, 2007 10:55 AM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: RE: Joe Burdette - Re: Marbella Garage DRC Application Comments Wayne, For the comments I assume you want the changes clouded and a response letter addressing each change. Is that correct? Timothy S. Aebie Vice President Ground Floor Engineering Tim @groundfl.com www.groundfl.com 800 - 738 -0525 DISCLAIMER: No expressed or implied warranty is made by Ground Floor Engineering, Inc. regarding the accuracy or reliability of electronically stored data. We reserve the right to modify, update, and develop electronically stored information without notice and assume no liability for any errors resulting from use of same. User agrees to corroborate the data to determine its accuracy for the planned use. Although we strive to make certain the data is virus free, we assume no responsibility for any damage caused by installation. Use of this data indicates that User accepts the above conditions. This e -mail contains proprietary and /or confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient, any dissemination or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you received this message in error, please immediately alert Tim Aebie by reply e- mail and then delete this message and its attachments. From: Wayne.WelIs @myClearwater.com [ma i Ito: Wayne. WelIs @myClearwater.com] Sent: Thursday, June 14, 2007 8:02 AM To: Hunraf @aol.com; bcala @gmadesign.com; bhornjak @themurraycompany.com; Ehooperl @aol.com; galbers @themurraycompany.com; luke.luccainc @comcast.net; ccuffle @wraconsultants.com; jcimino @wraconsultants.com Cc: jim @groundfl.com; tim @groundfl.com; michael.delk @MyClearwater.com Subject: RE: Joe Burdette - Re: Marbella Garage DRC Application Comments Joe - 6/15/2007 1 7 0 0 Page 2 of 3 As to the Letter of Incompleteness for Case FLD2007- 06020: 1. It is now our understanding that the Marbella project will retain the 102 dwelling units, all on Parcel A. This application material for Case FLD2007 -06020 needs to reflect this number of units and the location of the units. 2. Based on your desire to complete the proposed Minor Revision moving the 10 dwelling units from Parcel B to Parcel A, the submittal of the requirements under this comment are being delayed to after the DRC meeting. Reasoning is that the Minor Revision isn't complete and approved yet and it would be confusing at this point to submit "old" stuff. This application ADDS the use of "parking garage and lot" to the Marbella project on Parcel B. I do not need the survey for Parcel A and C for the Minor Revision. It must be submitted as part of FLD2007- 06020. The Minor Revision needs to address the comments provided April 19, 2007. 3. The written material needs to reference that this is an ADDITION of the "parking garage and lot" on Parcel B. The written material needs to reference the 102 units on Parcel A. This parking garage and lot is not a freestanding use, but the written material must also reflect the use approved under FLD2005 -02021 (and as approved [not yet, but you need to assume such in the written material] under the Minor Revision). 4. With the retainage of the 102 dwelling units (all on Parcel A), this comment is deleted. 5 - 9. Please address these comments as written. Joe, this modifies what you have said below in your email. We have two inter - related, parallel applications /reviews going on at the same time (the Minor Revision and Case FLD2007- 06020). The Minor Revision has to happen quickly if Case FLD2007 -06020 is to be found sufficient to move forward to the CDB (after DRC review). If you have any questions, please call or email me. Wayne - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Hunraf @aol.com [mailto:Hunraf @aol.com] Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2007 8:11 AM To: bcala @gmadesign.com; bhornjak @themurraycompany.com; Ehooperl @aol.com; galbers @themurraycompany.com; luke.luccainc @comcast.net; ccuffle @wraconsultants.com; jcimino @wraconsultants.com Cc: jim @groundfl.com; tim @groundfl.com; Delk, Michael; Wells, Wayne Subject: Joe Burdette - Re: Marbella Garage DRC Applicatin Comments Memo To: Marbella Garage Construction Team Fr: Joe Burdette Re: Garage DRC Comments. I have spoken to Wayne Wells at the city and he has consulted with Michael Delk regarding the comments we receive back on our DRC application for the proposed city 6/15/2007 Page 3 of 3 garage. I am copying both Michael and Wayne on this email in case I misunderstood anything or say something incorrect in this email. In order to simplify the garage application, it will be necessary to address the Marbella Condominium minor amendment comments we received back some time ago. I have instructed Ground Floor Engineering to address the comments and make the necessary changes to allow us to resubmit that request for a minor amendment. By doing this, that should fully address comments number 1,3 and 4 of the garage comments. As to comment number 2, the resubmittal of the Marbella Condominium should take care of the following: 2a: Survey for Parcel A (still need the survey for Parcel C which I thought we had ?), 2b, 2c, 2d, 2e, 2f, 2g and 2h, all of which are contained in the original approved plan and/or will be addressed through the minor amendment process. Based on the above, please address comments number 5, 6, 7, 8, and 9 only for the garage and I will handle the rest. As to comment #6, I believe the original application contains a complete and numbered tree survey. You might want to check that with Wayne Wells (562 -4504) and see if we can't just use that. You will need to have the garage comments addressed and returned to the city no later than 10:00 a.m. next Monday, June 18 in order to stay on schedule for the July DRC. As to the minor amendments for the condominium, we have until June 25, to resubmit the minor amendments for the Marbella Condominium and keep this project on schedule. I will handle that part with Ground Floor Engineering. If you have any questions, call me (727- 458 -4528) or email me. Michael and Wayne: If I have misunderstood anything or misstated anything in this email, please me know so I can correct it. Thanks to everyone Joe See what's free at AOL.com. 6/15/2007 Pagel of 3 Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Thursday, June 14; 2007 8:02 AM To: 'Hunraf @aol.com; bcala @gmadesign.com; bhornjak @themurraycompany.com; Ehooper1 @ aol.com; galbers @themurraycompany.com; luke.luccainc @comcast.net; ccuffle @wraconsultants.com; jcimino @wraconsultants.com Cc: jim @groundfl.com; tim @groundfl.com; Delk, Michael Subject: RE: Joe Burdette - Re: Marbella Garage DRC Application Comments Joe - As to the Letter of Incompleteness for Case FLD2007- 06020: 1. It is now our understanding that the Marbella project will retain the 102 dwelling units, all on Parcel A. This application material for Case FLD2007 -06020 needs to reflect this number of units and the location of the units. 2. Based on your desire to complete the proposed Minor Revision moving the 10 dwelling units from Parcel B to Parcel A, the submittal of the requirements under this comment are being delayed to after the DRC meeting. Reasoning is that the Minor Revision isn't complete and approved yet and it would be confusing at this point to submit "old" stuff. This application ADDS the use of "parking garage and lot" to the Marbella project on Parcel B. I do not need the survey for Parcel A and C for the Minor Revision. It must be submitted as part of FLD2007- 06020. The Minor Revision needs to address the comments provided April 19, 2007. 3. The written material needs to reference that this is an ADDITION of the "parking garage and lot" on Parcel B. The written material needs to reference the 102 units on Parcel A. This parking garage and lot is not a freestanding use, but the written material must also reflect the use approved under FLD2005 -02021 (and as approved [not yet, but you need to assume such in the written material] under the Minor Revision). 4. With the retainage of the 102 dwelling units (all on Parcel A), this comment is deleted. 5 - 9. Please address these comments as written. Joe, this modifies what you have said below in your email. We have two inter - related, parallel applications /reviews going on at the same time (the Minor Revision and Case FLD2007- 06020). The Minor Revision has to happen quickly if Case FLD2007 =06020 is to be found sufficient to move forward to the CDB (after DRC review). If you have any questions, please call or email me. Wayne - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Hunraf @aol.com [mailto:Hunraf @aol.com] Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2007 8:11 AM To: bcala @gmadesign.com; bhornjak @themurraycompany.com; Ehooperl @aol.com; 6/14/2007 0 . Page 2 of 3 galbers @themurraycompany.com; luke.luccainc @comcast.net; ccuffle @wraconsultants.com; jcimino @wraconsultants.com Cc: jim @groundfl.com; tim @groundfl.com; Delk, Michael; Wells, Wayne Subject: Joe Burdette - Re: Marbella Garage DRC Applicatin Comments Memo To: Marbella Garage Construction Team Fr: Joe Burdette Re: Garage DRC Comments. I have spoken to Wayne Wells at the city and he has consulted with Michael Delk regarding the comments we receive back on our DRC application for the proposed city garage. I am copying both Michael and Wayne on this email in case I misunderstood anything or say something incorrect in this email. In order to simplify the garage application, it will be necessary to address the Marbella Condominium minor amendment comments we received back some time ago. I have instructed Ground Floor Engineering to address the comments and make the necessary changes to allow us to resubmit that request for a minor amendment. By doing this, that should fully address comments number 1, 3 and 4 of the garage comments. As to comment number 2, the resubmittal of the Marbella Condominium should take care of the following: 2a: Survey for Parcel A (still need the survey for Parcel C which I thought we had ?), 2b, 2c, 2d, 2e, 2f, 2g and 2h, all of which are contained in the original approved plan and/or will be addressed through the minor amendment process. Based on the above, please address comments number 5, 6, 7, 8, and 9 only for the garage and I will handle the rest. As to comment #6, I believe the original application contains a complete and numbered tree survey. You might want to check that with Wayne Wells (562 -4504) and see if we can't just use that. You will need to have the garage comments addressed and returned to the city no later than 10:00 a.m. next Monday, June 18 in order to stay on schedule for the July DRC. As to the minor amendments for the condominium, we have until June 25, to resubmit the minor amendments for the Marbella Condominium and keep this project on schedule. I will handle that part with Ground Floor Engineering. If you have any questions, call me (727- 458 -4528) or email me. Michael and Wayne: If I have misunderstood anything or misstated anything in this email, please me know so I can correct it. Thanks to everyone Joe 6/14/2007 • 0 • Page 3 of 3 See what's free at AOL.com. 6/14/2007 e `1 • • Page 1 of 2 Wells, Wayne From: Delk, Michael Sent: Monday, June 11, 2007 10:23 AM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: FW: Joe Burdette - Re: Proposed Beach Garage? Wayne - FYI. MR - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Hunraf @aol.com [mailto:Hunraf @aol.com] Sent: Monday, June 11, 2007 7:31 AM To: Irwin, Rod Cc: bcala @gmadesign.com; bhornjak @themurraycompany.com; ed @jpfirm.com; galbers @themurraycompany.com; luke.luccainc @comcast.net; gbrumbac @hotmail.com; Delk, Michael Subject: Re: Joe Burdette - Re: Proposed Beach Garage? The construction cost estimates have not changed since out meeting 2 weeks ago.... hard cost is $20,000 per spot (due to having to meet Beach by Design architectural requirements, city of Clearwater parking dept. requirements i.e.: office, bathrooms, walk -up pay stations and equipment, a/c for the office, etc. etc.. In addition the following cost must be included as they are actual cost: 1. Interest carry during construction 2. Costs of tearing up new curb and putting in a different curb (planning dept. requirement) 3. Landscaping to meet Beach by Design criteria 4. But most of all: The requirement of your parking department for wide spans in the garage substantially increases costs due for wider beams, thicker slabs, larger pile caps... etc 5. And finally, the developer is entitled to sum amount of "pre -tax" profit. Until this project is ready to be built and a "start date" given, there is no way to get hard bids from subcontractors, so the above are our construction estimates added to the $5,000 per space according to your appraiser which is ridiculous, but that is another story for another day. You have the same drawings that we have (in planning), you can always get your own estimates. Right now the price is $30,000 per spot until Luke says otherwise. If you would prefer, I will meet individually with all the council members and explain this. I have already met with two of them and it won't take me long to meet with two more. Let me know if that is what you want me to do. 6/14/2007 1 y Page 2 of 2 See what's free at AOL.com. 6/14/2007 �r. � • Page 1 of 2 Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2007 4:46 PM To: 'hunraf @aol.com' Cc: luke.luccainc@comcast.net; Delk, Michael; 'ccuffle @wraconsultants.com' Subject: RE: Marbella Joe - I have discussed this with Michael Delk. Under this application, if the proposed modification to the Marbella project approved under FLD2005 -02021 is to ADD a parking garage use on Parcel B, keeping the total 102 dwelling units on Parcel A, then the following must occur: 1. You need to submit the revisions plans and information addressing the review comments for the Minor Revision by June 25, 2007. This will need to be finalized quickly for this application to stay on track. 2. The Minor Revision plans, once approved, must become part of this application for reference purposes only. This means that the overall project will need to incorporate the site and landscape plans, building elevations, etc. and be submitted as part of the package that goes to the CDB. Therefore, the items requested as part of #2 of the Letter of Incompleteness (not as indicated in the Letter but as indicated here as the Minor Revision information) is not necessary now, but will be required in order to go to the CDB. 3. Modifying Letter of Incompleteness #3 - Written material needs to reflect 102 dwelling units. 4. Modifying Letter of Incompleteness #4 - Delete. 5. Modifying Letter of Incompleteness #5 - Site data must include a separate site data table for Parcel A with 102 dwelling units. Wayne - - - -- Original Message---- - From: hunraf @aol.com [mailto:hunraf @aol.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2007 1:58 PM To: Wells, Wayne Cc: luke.luccainc @comcast.net Subject: Marbella Wayne Per our discussion, it is Lucca Developments intention to go forward with 102 units on Parcel A. We will turn around the Garage on Parcel B by the June 18 deadline addressing all the comments. As to Marbella (Parcel A) minor amendments, I would like to request an extra week to June 25 to have those back to you while keeping the garage project on schedule. Please let me know if this is acceptable. Thank You Joe Burdette 6/12/2007 Page 2 of 2 Owner's Representative AOL now offers free email to everyone. Find out more about what's free from AOL at AOL.com. 6/12/2007 Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Monday, June 11, 2007 4:03 PM To: 'ccuffle @wraconsultants.com' Subject: FLD2007- 06020, Marrabella Clint - Attached is a Letter of Incompleteness for the above referenced project. The original letter is being mailed. As you will note by the comments, if this is an amendment of the original approval for Parcel B, we still need to deal with Parcels A and C. While not part of the comments in the attached letter, the original approval utilized the primary address of 325 South Gulfview Boulevard. This is the address that should be used on the application (understanding that the primary area of change is Parcel B). There are many addresses for the overall property. Call me (727- 562 -4504) or email me if you have questions. Wayne letter of completeness 6.11., 1 Water bmwe ASSOSIAT €S 0 9 4260 West Linebaugh Avenue Tampa, Florida 33624 813 - 265 -3130 phone 813 - 265 -6610 fax www.wraconsultants.com Engineering ♦ Planning ♦ Environmental Science LETTER- OF TRANSMITTAL TO: Planning Department Date: 06108107 City of Clearwater Project: Marrabella Parking Garage — Parcel B 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, Florida 33756 We Transmit: The Following: For Your: Action Needed/Taken: ■ Herewith ❑ Drawings/Prints ■ Use ❑ Your Signature ❑ By Separate Cover ❑ Correspondence ■ Review &Comment ❑ Revise & Resubmit ❑ As Requested ❑ Disk(s) ■ Reference/Files ❑ Call Upon Receipt ❑ Via Overnight Delivery ■ Other ❑ Please Return ❑ Please find enclosed, the above referenced documents for the Marrabella Parking Garage — Parcel B. Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact us at 813- 265 -3130. Thank you, Water Reso rce Associates Clint Cuffle Project Engineer 813- 265 -3130 ccuffle @wraconsultants.com ORIGINAL RECEIVED JUN 08 2007 PlA y G OF E C EARWAIER DESCRIPTION 15 Flexible Development / Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project Applications with Attachments 15 Sets of Signed Sealed Site Drawings for Parking Garage 15 Signed and Sealed Tree/Topographic/Boundary Survey for Project Site 15 Architectural Site Plans and Details 1 Full Scale Color Rendering of Parking Garage 1 Check in the Amount of $1,205.00 for fee Please find enclosed, the above referenced documents for the Marrabella Parking Garage — Parcel B. Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact us at 813- 265 -3130. Thank you, Water Reso rce Associates Clint Cuffle Project Engineer 813- 265 -3130 ccuffle @wraconsultants.com ORIGINAL RECEIVED JUN 08 2007 PlA y G OF E C EARWAIER J o 0 C ClearWater ITY OF CL RWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING 0 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE: (727) 562 -4567 FAX: (727) 562 -4576 W W W. MYCLEARWATER. COM June 11, 2007 Clint Cuffle 4260 W. Linebaugh Ave Tampa, Fl VIA FAX: 813 - 265 -6610 RE: FLD2007 -06020 -- 345 CORONADO DR -- Letter of Incompleteness Dear Clint Cuffle : The Planning Staff has entered your application into the Department's filing system and assigned the case number: FLD2007- 06020. After a preliminary review of the submitted documents, staff has determined that the application is Incomplete with the following comments. 1. Based on Attachment A, this proposal is a modification to Case FLD2005- 02021, where the 10 -unit condominium building approved for Parcel B is to be replaced with a six -story parking garage. Please confirm that the overall revised Marbella (or Marrabella, spelling unclear) project will be only 92 dwelling units with this application (not 102 dwelling units). 2. As a modification to that approved under FLD2005- 02021, need the following (one original and 14 copies): a. surveys (boundary, topographic and tree) for Parcels A and C; b. site and landscape plans for the 92 -unit condominium building on Parcel A (may be a copy of what was previously approved by the CDB); c. building elevations for the 92 -unit condominium building on Parcel A (may be a copy of what was previously approved by the CDB); d. colored elevation for at least one elevation of the 92 -unit condominium building (may be the same as what was previously approved by the CDB); e. floor plans for the 92 -unit condominium building on Parcel A (may be a copy of what was previously approved by the CDB); f. property deeds for Parcels A and C; g. tree inventory for Parcels A and C (as appropriate); and h. stormwater analysis for Parcel A. 3. As a modification to that approved under FLD2005- 02021, the application written material needs to reflect the 92 -unit condominium building on Parcel A, even though it was previously approved and is not proposed to be revised, including responses to General Applicability and Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria (assumed that it is not being revised from that previously approved by the CDB). 4. If this application is modifying what was originally approved under FLD2005- 02021, where the 10 dwelling units on Parcel B are being dropped, then it is presumed that the Transfer of Development Rights (TDR) is also being modified. Provide revised application and information required by application. 5. Based on this application modifying that previously approved under FLD2005- 02021, the site data must be revised to reflect this change in number of dwelling unit, parking, etc. Letter of Incompleteness - FLD2007 -06020 - 345 CORONADO DR 0Clearwate• CITY OF CL�RWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE: (727)'562-4567 FAX: (727) 562 -4576 WWW.MYCLEARWATER.COM June 11, 2007 6. The survey submitted as Attachment H is intended as a tree survey. The survey, however, does not indicate the tree numbers that the tree inventory (Attachment I) indicates (tree # 7 -25). Revise to indicate the tree number on the survey (so it will correlate with the inventory). 7. Sight triangles, while shown on Sheets 6 - 9, are incorrectly shown locationally on Hamden Drive. Sight triangles must be shown along the property line and the edge of the driveway. 8. Sheet 6'- Provide the angle of the angled spaces along the south property line. 9. Depict by shading or crosshatching of all required parking lot interior landscaped areas (10 percent of the vehicular use area [VUA] for only the open parking area outside of the parking garage). If less than 4,000 square feet of VUA, then interior landscaping is not required. Provide the square footage of the VUA for only the open parking area outside of the parking garage on Sheet 6. Section 4 -202 of the Community Development Code states that if an application is deemed incomplete, the deficiencies of the application shall be specified by Staff. No further development review action shall be taken until the deficiencies are corrected and the application is deemed complete. Please resubmit by 10:00 am on Monday, June 18, 2007. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at 727 -562 -4504 or Wayne.Wells@myclearwater.com. Sincerely yours, Wa e Wells Planner III Letter of Incompleteness - FLD2007 -06020 - 345 CORONADO DR 4 V. a� Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Tuesday, April 22, 2008.2:32 PM To: 'wsykes @thebeachouse.com' Subject: Mr. Castrogiovanni Letter #2 HIR Since you were in this morning regarding these properties, and since. just receiving this email with the attached letter, I. thought you might find this informative. Wayne - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Clayton, Gina Sent: Tuesday, April 22, 2008 1:16 PM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: FW: Mr. Castrogiovanni Letter #2 FYI - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Kronschnabl, Jeff Sent: Tuesday, April 22, 2008 1:04 PM To: Silverboard, Jill; Akin, Pam Cc: Dougall- Sides, Leslie; Horne, William; Irwin, Rod; Andrews, Wayne; Geer, Jamie; Strong, Steve; Bates, Dan; Brown, Shelby; Klein, Sidney; Williams, Dewey; Teunis, Mark; Steffens, James; Lopez, Perry; Lopez, Geraldine Campos; Quillen, Michael; Butler, Wayne; Rickard, Leonard; Soto, Camilo; Garriott, Kevin; Delk, Michael; Clayton, Gina Subject: FW: Mr. Castrogiovanni Letter #2 Letter sent - see attached - thanks Leslie, Jill and Shelby for your help on this Finance representatives /attorney advised that they will draw up an agreement with Mr. Castrogiovanni that clearly meets expectations outlined by the City - within a reasonable time frame. They also asked for the process line items for demolishing a building. We will provide them with a reasonable time table and steps as requested. Mr. Surdette stated that his client /owner will meet the conditions outlined in the letter but has questions on "Density Rights ".... Thanks to all for your support and interest on these projects - Jeff Subject: Documentl Docl .doc BEACH GARAGE IDEA LS - Newspaper Archives I tampabay - St. Petersbur... Pagel of 2 BEACH GARAGE IDEA LOOMS [STATE Edition] St. Petersburg Times - St. Petersburg, Fla. Author: MIKE DONILA Date: Dec 2, 2007 Start Page: 1 Text Word Count: 686 Document Text Residents opposed a previous plan for Clearwater Beach, but city leaders are taking another look. City leaders are expected to revisit a controversial beach project: a parking garage along its powdery sands. A massive public outcry scuttled the plan years ago, but some Clearwater leaders say a city-owned spot on the south part of the beach might just be the best and cheapest place to build. Still, it's not a done deal yet. The city is hoping it can strike a deal with Lucca Development of Illinois to buy an almost 1 -acre parcel about two blocks from the beach. But there are still obstacles to overcome. Obituaries Search Lookup Any Death Record Obituary Using Our Vital Record Databases! Gov- Resources.comNital Records Obituaries Search Lookup Obituaries, Cemetery Records & Death Records Using Our Database! People- Records.net Free Local Classifieds Pets, Autos, Real Estate & More Buy /Sell Anything Local at LiveDeal www.LiveDeal.com Makes Leaf Bags Easy Hold bag open — Pack it full. Slide SIX leaf bags ... in ONE load! www.BigS[ider.com Ada by C ie If a deal can't be reached, the City Council will begin talking about building a garage at its southernmost parking lot next to the where the Adam's Mark Hotel was on Clearwater Beach. Here's the situation: Lucca plans to build a $125 - million condominium project called Marbella on S Gulfview Boulevard. As part of the project, it also wanted to build a 400- to 500 -space parking garage on Fifth Street between Hamden and Coronado drives. But with condominium sales slow, Lucca now wants to sell the Fifth Street parcel to the city for $3.5- million. However, both properties are financially tied together so Lucca needs its lenders to sign off on the plan. The city gave the developer until late January to get the deal done. "There's a couple issues we need to work through," said Joe Burdette, whose Consus Group represents Lucca. If the deal doesn't work, City Manager Bill Horne said the city would have little choice but to consider building a parking garage on the beach. He acknowledged the proposal would be unpopular, but said the city needs to make up for the spots lost because of the BeachWalk promenade project. The new walkways, which stretch almost a half -mile from Pier 60 to the former Adam's Mark location, have eaten up hundreds of parking spaces along S Gulfview Boulevard. "Yes, the spot is controversial, but not having parking is pretty controversial, too, and our options are limited," Council member Paul Gibson said. "If someone has a better choice I'll listen, but so far one hasn't been found." Council member George Cretekos said he isn't against building on the city's property, but he'd like to see a plan before committing. http://pqasb.pqarchiver.com/sptimes/access/1 39220744 I.html?dids=l 392207441:1392207... 12/4/2007 s BEACH GARAGE IDEA LQ19A4S - Newspaper Archives I tampabayn - St. Petersbur... Page 2 of 2 Vice Mayor John Doran said he'd consider building there, but "it's not my first preference." "You can make the fiscal argument that we already own the land," Doran said. "But the aesthetic argument is: 'What, are you crazy? You're going to build a garage on the waterfront?' " Mayor Frank Hibbard said he would not support it. If the Lucca deal falls through, the city should talk to other property owners, he said. Council member Carlen Petersen said she also opposes the location. "We have the prettiest beach in the world," she said. "Why would we want to do that ?" The city has about $6- million set aside to buy property and more than $12- million in planned revenues earmarked for a parking garage in the recently voter- approved Penny for Pinellas sales tax. A 350 -space garage could cost as much as $9- million to build. In May 2003, city leaders discussed building a 335 -space garage on top of the 1.4 -acre parking lot. But residents were horrified, saying it would close the window to one of the only places in south Clearwater Beach where motorists can catch a glimpse of the Gulf of Mexico from their cars. Anne Garris, a member of Save the Bayfront and a frequent critic of the, City Council, said "we're already cutting off too much of the actual use of the beach." She urged city leaders to look elsewhere. Sheila Cole, executive director of the Clearwater Beach Chamber of Commerce, said members are split. "The biggest concern is that we are building this phenomenal BeachWalk and we're inviting visitors here, but where are they going to park ?" she asked. "Our options are dwindling and we may need to bite the bullet." Credit: Times Staff Writer Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction or distribution is prohibited without permission. Abstract (Document Summary) "Yes, the spot is controversial, but not having parking is pretty controversial, too, and our options are limited," Council member Paul Gibson said. "If someone has a better choice I'll listen, but so far one hasn't been found." "You can make the fiscal argument that we already own the land," [John Doran] said. "But the aesthetic argument is: 'What, are you crazy? You're going to build a garage on the waterfront?'" "The biggest concern is that we are building this phenomenal BeachWalk and we're" inviting visitors here, but where are they going to park ?" she asked. "Our options are dwindling and we may need to bite the bullet." Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction or distribution is prohibited without permission. Autumn Wedding Looking for Autumn Wedding? Find exactly what you want today. Yahoo.com Fall Wedding Get the latest in Fall Weddings Shop Vogue has the latest styles. www.shopvogue.ty Ads by GO O& http://pqasb.pqarchiver.com/sptimes/access/I 3 92207441.htm1 ?dids = l 392207441:1392207... 12/4/2007 Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Friday, August 31, 2007 10:45 AM To: 'David J. Coviello' Cc: Irwin, Rod; Akin, Pam; Delk, Michael; Clayton, Gina; Thompson, Neil Subject: Marbella David - The City is having on -going discussions regarding the City purchasing parking within this garage. The Flexible Development application recently approved by the Community Development Board (CDB) was conditioned on the approval of a Development Agreement with the City. This Development Agreement, which will set out the financial aspects of the garage, has not yet been submitted for City review and approval. There may be additional purchase agreements or other legal documents necessary for such purchase. Rod Irwin, Assistant City Manager, and Pam Akin, City Attorney, are key City personnel regarding such agreement to purchase parking in this garage. Wayne - - - -- Original Message---- - From: David J. Coviello [mailto:DCoviello @shutts.com] Sent: Friday, August 31, 2007 8:55 AM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: RE: Marbella Wayne: A few follow -up questions... (1) Has the City had conversations with the developer on buying the spaces in the garage? Would the City be buying the spaces or the entire garage, how would that work? Also, what is the procedure for City approving purchase? Resolution? Thanks again for your assistance. Regards, David David J. Coviello, Esq. Shutts & Bowen LLP 1500 Miami Center 201 South Biscayne Boulevard Miami, FL 33131 305 - 415 -9437 (phone) 305 - 415 -9837 (fax) dcoviello @shutts - law.com - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Wayne.Wells @myClearwater.com [ mailto :Wayne.Wells @myClearwater.com] Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2007 9:23 AM To: David J. Coviello Subject: Marbella «Gulfview S 325 Development Order Amended 6.16.06.doc>> «Gulfview S 1 325 Time Ext. Dev. Order 3.i3.07.doc>> «Gulfview S 0325 Minor Revisions Development Order 8.13.07.doc>> «Gulfview S 325 Staff Report.doc>> «Gulfview S 325 Development Order 8.21.07.doc>> "SHUTTS- LAW.COM" made the following annotations. IRS CIRCULAR 230 NOTICE: Pursuant to recently enacted U.S. Treasury Department Regulations, we are now required to advise you that, unless otherwise expressly indicated, any federal tax advice expressed above was neither written nor intended by the sender or this firm to be used and cannot be used by any taxpayer for the purpose of avoiding penalties that may be imposed under U.S. tax law. If any person uses or refers to any such tax advice in promoting, marketing or recommending a partnership or other entity, investment plan or arrangement to any taxpayer, then the advice should be considered to have been written to support the promotion or marketing by a person other than the sender or this firm of that transaction or matter, and such taxpayer should seek advice based on the taxpayer's particular circumstances from an independent tax advisor. The information in this email transmission is privileged and confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, nor the employee or agent responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination or copying of this transmission (including any attachments) is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender by email reply. Thank you. ORIGINAL CDB Meeting Date: August 21, 2007 Case Number: FLD2007 -06020 Agenda Item: El Owner /Applicant: Lucca Development LLC Representative: Clint Cuffle, Water Resource. Associates, Inc. Addresses: 325 South Gulfview Boulevard 326 345, 347 and 353 Coronado Drive and 350 Hamden Drive CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT GENERAL INFORMATION: REQUEST: Flexible Development approval in the Tourist District to permit the addition of a Parking Garage and Lot of 377 spaces to Parcel "B" (located between Coronado Drive and Hamden Drive, north of 5th Street) to a previously approved project of 102 attached dwelling units (FLD2005- 02021 /TDR2005 -03020 approved by the CDB on July 19, 2005), with reductions to the front (south along 5th Street) setback from 15 feet to 4.4 feet (to screen wall) and to 5.5 feet (to pavement), a reduction to the front (east along Hamden Drive) from 15 feet to 12.7 feet (to building) and an increase to building height from 35 feet to 51.35 feet (to top parking deck), as a Comprehensive Inflll Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2- 803.C, with a reduction to required interior landscaping from 10 to 3.7 percent and a reduction to required foundation landscaping on the south side of the parking garage from five to two feet, as a Comprehensive Landscape Program, under the provisions of Section 3- 1202.G. CURRENT ZONING: Tourist (T) District CURRENT FUTURE LAND Resort Facilities High (RFH) USE CATEGORY: BEACH BY DESIGN Beach Walk CHARACTER DISTRICT: PROPERTY USE: Current Use: Overnight accommodations and dwelling units Proposed Use: Addition of a Parking Garage and Lot of 377 spaces to a previously approved attached dwelling, project of 102 attached dwellings EXISTING North: Tourist (T) District Retail sales; Restaurant; Overnight SURROUNDING ZONING accommodations AND USES: South: Tourist (T) District Restaurant; Overnight accommodations East: Tourist (T) District Overnight accommodations; Water West: Tourist (T) District Beach; Overnight accommodations Community Development Board — August 21, 2007 FLD2007- 06020— Page 1 of 13 ANALYSIS: . Site Location and Existing Conditions: The 2.37 total acres is generally located between S. Gulfview Blvd. and Coronado Dr. west of Brightwater Blvd. (Parcel A), between Coronado Dr. & Hamden Dr. north of 5th St. (Parcel B) and east of Hamden Dr. north of 5th St. (Parcel Q. On July 19; 2005, the Community Development Board (CDB) approved with 15 conditions Case Nos. FLD2005- 02021 /TDR2005 -03020 to permit a total of 102 attached dwellings, with 92 dwelling units in a 148 -foot tall building on Parcel A and 10 dwelling units in a 64 -foot tall building on Parcel B, which included the Termination of Status of Nonconformity (equivalent of 119 hotel units [116 hotel units and three dwelling units] where 93 hotel units are permitted), the conversion of these hotel units to residential units and the Transfer of Development Rights of 18 hotel units from 401 Coronado Drive and 406 Hamden Drive (donor sites). Parcel A is located between South Gulfview Boulevard and Coronado Drive, approximately 300 feet south of Third Street and 170 feet north of Fifth Street, and consists of two properties a total of 1.41 acres. Parcel A is developed with three buildings between one- and five- stories in height. There are a total of 69 existing overnight accommodation units on Parcel A. The approval of Case Nos. FLD2005- 02021/TDR2005 -03020 included the demolition of all existing buildings and site improvements. Parcel B is 0.93 acres in size and consists of three properties, bounded by Coronado Drive on the west, Hamden Drive on the east and Fifth Street to the south. Parcel B is developed with four, one -story and two, two -story buildings with a total of 46 overnight accommodation units and three dwelling units. The approval of Case Nos. FLD2005- 02021/TDR2005 -03020 included the demolition of all existing buildings and site improvements. Parcel C, associated and currently joined together with two properties included with Parcel B, is 0.03 acres and is developed with two docks (four slips). The two existing docks will remain and will serve as an accessory use for the attached dwellings. On August 13, 2007, the Planning Director approved with 13 conditions a Minor Revision, under the provisions of Section 4- 406.A, relocating the 10 dwelling units approved on Parcel B to Parcel A, so that Parcel A will have all 102 dwelling units approved under the original application, and Parcel B will only have accessory parking located on it (the balance between the 187 parking spaces provided on Parcel A and that necessary to provide overall required parking for the 102 dwelling units at a rate of two parking spaces per unit [total of 204 spaces]). The Aqualea/Hyatt project has been approved (and is under construction) to the north of Parcel A for a 250 -room hotel and 18 attached dwellings, which will include a parking garage of over 750 parking spaces, of which 400 spaces will be for the public. The property to the north of Parcel B at 342 Hamden Drive and 343 Coronado Drive was approved by the CDB on November 15, 2005, for 17 attached dwellings in a building 78 feet tall (Case FLD2005- 07066) (time extension granted to May 15, 2008). The property between South Gulfview Boulevard and Coronado Drive on the south side of 5h Street (401, 411 and 421 South Gulfview Boulevard) to the south and west of Parcel B was approved by the CDB to permit 100 attached dwelling units in a building 100 feet tall (FLD2005- 07068) (time extension granted to March 20, 2008). The property located at the northeast corner of Hamden Drive and Bayside Drive (409 Hamden Drive; now 100 Bayside Drive) .to the southeast of Parcel B was approved for and has been constructed with 10 attached dwelling units (FLD2004- 01003). The surrounding area is a tourist area currently developed with retail sales and service uses, restaurants and overnight accommodation uses. Community Development Board — August 21, 2007 FLD2007 -06020 — Page 2 of 13 Development Proposal: The proposal is to add the use of Parking Garage and Lot for 377 spaces to Parcel B (located between Coronado Drive and Hamden Drive, north of 5th Street) to a previously approved project of 102 attached dwelling units (FLD2005- 02021 /TDR2005- 03020). While the proposed additional use of Parking Garage and Lot is listed only in the Tourist District as a Flexible Standard use, this request is being processed as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project because the minimum setbacks are not being met and the maximum allowable height is being exceeded. The approvals granted for the development of the 102 attached dwellings on Parcel A will not be affected. Parcel A will be developed with 102 attached dwelling units with 187 parking spaces. Since the 10 dwelling units originally approved on Parcel B have been relocated to Parcel A under the Minor Revision recently approved, Parcel B can only be used for parking and open space. Due to the Code requirement for two parking spaces per unit (204 total parking spaces required for the 102 dwelling units), Parcel B will provide 17 parking spaces for the attached dwellings on Parcel A. Of the 377 parking spaces being provided on Parcel B, 300 parking spaces are intended to be sold to the City for public parking. Of the remaining 77 parking spaces, 50 spaces will be at ground level and 27 spaces will be on the 6"' floor, all for use by the developer /owner. Of the 50 ground level spaces, 17 spaces will be for the attached dwellings on Parcel A. Therefore, 60 spaces on Parcel B, whether on the ground level or the 6th level, will be available for the developer to use to provide parking for other projects or users. Since the majority of the parking in this garage will be public parking, a small office with a restroom has been provided for City personnel on the south side of the exit driveway to Hamden Drive. Since this Parcel B is within Flood Zone A, the Building Code will require this small office to be floodproofed. Since Parcel B is part of the original project used for density purposes (of Parcels A, B and C), a Unity of Title will be required to be recorded tying Parcels A, B and C together as one lot for development purposes. A condominium style of ownership will be required for the City to buy parking spaces on Parcel B. Access to the ground level parking will be from 5th Street, whereas parking for the garage will be from Hamden Drive. The garage is proposed at a height of 51.35 feet from BFE to the highest floor level. The proposed building has been designed using a Mediterranean architectural theme. The parking garage will be primarily painted ivoire (a light beige color). The upper levels of the stair /elevator towers, as well as column/accents, will be painted Anjou pear (a darker beige color). Opening mullions and column accents will be painted flower pot (a rust color). The stair /elevator towers will have a hip roof finished with standing seam metal roof of a flower pot color. Floor Area Ratio (F.A.R.) and Density: Pursuant to the Countywide Future Land Use Plan, the maximum density for properties with a designation of Resort Facilities High is 30 dwelling units per acre. As previously approved under FLD2005- 02021/TDR2005- 03020, the attached dwelling project utilized the Termination of Status of Nonconformity and density conversion provisions, as well as the Transfer of Development Rights, to produce 102 dwelling units. The addition of the Parking Garage and Lot use, which is not classified as Floor Area, will not change the prior approvals. The Minor Revision recently approved relocated 10 dwelling units from Parcel B to Parcel A. Impervious Surface Ratio (I.S.R.): Pursuant to Section 2 -801.1 of the Community Development Code, the maximum allowable I.S.R. is 0.95. The overall proposed I.S.R. for Parcels A and B is 0.86, which is consistent with the Code provisions. Minimum Lot Area and Width: Pursuant to Table 2 -802 of the Community Development Code, the minimum lot area for the Parking Garage and Lot is 20,000 square feet. The subject property is 40,546 square feet in area. Pursuant to the same Table, the minimum lot width for the Parking Garage and Lot is 100 feet. The lot width of Parcel B along Coronado Drive is 183.86 feet, 184.74 feet along Hamden Drive and 220 feet along 5"' Street. The proposal is consistent with these Code provisions. Community Development Board — August 21, 2007 FLD2007 -06020 — Page 3 of 13 0 0 Minimum Setbacks: Pursuant to Table 2 -802 of the Community Development Code, the minimum front setback for the Parking Garage and Lot is 15 feet and the minimum side setback is 10 feet. The proposal includes reductions to the front (south along 5th Street) setback from 15 feet to 4.4 feet (to screen wall) and to 5.5 feet (to pavement) and a reduction to the front (east along Hamden Drive) from 15 feet to 12.7 feet (to building). The proposed parking garage has been designed maintaining the minimum 15 -foot front setback along Coronado Drive to the garage building. The west side of the garage facing Coronado Drive is at a height of 46.1 feet, which is lower than the east side of the garage facing Hamden Drive due to the .garage ramping. There is a stormwater retention pond along the north property line, where the design of this pond provides sufficient area to meet Code requirements for water quality outside the garage in an open area (there is additional stormwater retention area under the parking garage ramp to provide for water attenuation). This design places the face of the garage building columns at a side setback from the north property line at 14.25 feet, exceeding Code requirements. To meet requirements for parking lot design, the proposal includes a front setback reduction along Hamden Drive from 15 feet to 12.7 feet to the building. The reduction to the front setback from Hamden Drive, even though there is an increase to building height to 51.35 feet, is mitigated due to Clearwater Harbor to the east across Hamden Drive and the ability to have similar sized buildings along Brightwater Drive to the northeast. It is noted that the residential building recently constructed at 409 Hamden Drive (now 100 Bayside Drive) to the southeast was approved at a front setback of 12.83 feet from Hamden Drive (building height of 48.83 feet). The front setback reductions of 4.4 feet (to screen wall) and to 5.5 feet (to pavement) to 5`h Street are to ground level surface parking, as the parking garage building is 33 feet from the 5th Street property line. Proposed setbacks are consistent with existing setbacks for other projects in close proximity within this urban context. The Aqualea/Hyatt project at 301 S. Gulfview Boulevard to the north is approved to be constructed at a zero front setback to the building to S. Gulfview Boulevard and to Coronado Drive. Maximum Building Height: Pursuant to Table 2 -802 of the Community Development Code, the maximum allowable height for the Parking Garage and Lot is 50 feet. The proposed parking garage building has been designed at a height of 51.35 feet to the highest garage floor from Base Flood Elevation (BFE). The west side of the garage facing Coronado Drive is at a height of 46.1 feet, which is lower than the east side of the garage facing Hamden Drive of 51.35 feet due to the garage ramping. It is noted that the accessory parking garage and attached dwellings originally approved on this Parcel B under FLD2005- 02021 /TDR2005 -03020 was to be at a height of 64 feet. The residential building originally approved on Parcel A under FLD2005- 02021/TDR2005 -03020 will be at a height of 148 feet. The proposed garage height is consistent with other projects within the surrounding area. The residential building adjacently to the north of Parcel B at 342 Hamden Drive was approved at a height of 71.64 feet (FLD2005- 07066, approved November 15, 2005): Under the Small Motel District of Beach by Design, the maximum height of buildings on Brightwater Drive to the northeast can be four floors over ground level parking. Generally, based on approved and/or constructed condominium projects on Brightwater Drive, this will produce a maximum building height of approximately 45 feet. It was previously noted that the residential building to the southwest of Parcel B at 401, 411 and 421 South Gulfview Boulevard was approved is at a height of 100 feet (FLD2005- 07068, approved September 20, 2005). The residential building recently constructed at 409 Hamden Drive (now 100 Bayside Drive) to the southeast of Parcel B was approved at a building height of 48.83 feet (FLD2004- 01003, approved May 18, 2004). The Aqualea/Hyatt project at 301 South Gulfview Boulevard to the north was approved at a building height of 150 feet. Based upon the above, the development proposal is consistent with the Code and with other projects approved (but yet to be constructed), under construction or already constructed within the surrounding area. Community Development Board — August 21, 2007 FLD2007 -06020 — Page 4 of 13 9 0 An issue with the proposed parking garage is the height of the stair /elevator towers at the southwest and southeast corners of the parking garage building. Building elevations indicate the towers to be 20 feet in height from the top of the adjacent parking level. Under the definition of "Height, Building or Structure ", such towers are permitted to extend a maximum of 16 feet above the otherwise permitted height. Unless the architect can provide documentation at the building permit stage that the tower must exceed the maximum height of 16 feet to the 20 feet proposed, these two lowers should be required to be reduced to the maximum height of 16 feet as a condition of approval. Minimum Off - Street Parking: The original project approved for this overall site (Parcels A, B and C) under FLD2005- 02021 /TDR2005 -03020 provided a total of 239 parking spaces (137 parking spaces on Parcel A and 102 parking spaces on Parcel B, at a rate of 2.34 spaces per dwelling unit). While this exceeded the former minimum requirement of 1.5 spaces per dwelling unit, the approval recently granted under the Minor Revision provides 187 parking spaces on Parcel A and required a minimum of two parking spaces per dwelling unit to meet current Code requirements. Therefore, of the 77 spaces proposed on Parcel B above the 300 proposed public parking spaces in this Parking Garage and Lot, 17 of these spaces on the ground level are required for the dwelling units on Parcel A. Of these 77 parking spaces, 50 spaces will be at ground level and 27 spaces will be on the 6`h floor, all for use by the developer /owner. With 17 spaces on the ground level allocated for the attached dwellings on Parcel A, 60 spaces on this Parcel B, whether on the ground level or the 6' level, will be available for the developer to use to provide parking for other projects or users. Existing driveways on Coronado Drive, Hamden Drive and 50' Street not to be re -used will be removed and sidewalks constructed for the site frontages. Access to the majority of the parking spaces in the garage will be from Hamden Drive. This driveway has been designed with three lanes, allowing the center lane to be reversible (entrance or exit, depending on the time of day and demand). The design of this eastern driveway with the medians allows for the installation of a payment booth on the southern median. Gates are planned, along with ticket dispensers, with adequate stacking space from the sidewalk in Hamden Drive to allow safe ingress and egress to the proposed public parking in the garage. Access to the ground level parking will be from one -way driveways on 5`h Street. Eleven spaces are proposed as surface parking outside of the garage building facing 5`h Street. These spaces will be screened from view by a screen wall 30- inches in height, augmented by landscaping on the outside of the wall. Ground level parking in the garage is screened from view by walls, and openings are designed to emulate "windows" with painted mullions. Access to the developer - controlled parking on the 6`h level will be restricted through the use of gates. While the gates will restrict the public from accessing the developer - controlled parking, turn around areas are designed outside of these gates on the 66h level in the event all public parking is full. Mechanical Equipment: Pursuant to Section 3- 201.D.1 of the Community Development Code, all outside mechanical equipment shall be screened so as not to be visible from public streets and /or abutting properties. The proposed parking garage will be open air. The only area that will be enclosed will be the small office on the ground floor. Code does not permit any air conditioning unit within the front setback. Therefore, any air conditioning unit for the small office will need to be wall mounted, preferably inside the garage area where views will be screened and not on the outside wall of the garage building. The location and design of the air conditioning unit should be a condition of approval, required to be reviewed at time of the building permit. Based upon the above, the development proposal is, or will be, consistent with the Code with regard to screening of outdoor mechanical equipment. Sight Visibilily Triangles: Pursuant to Section 3 -904.A of the Community Development Code, to minimize hazards at street or driveway intersections, no structures or landscaping may be installed which will obstruct views at a level between 30 inches above grade and eight feet above grade within 20 -foot Community Development Board — August 21, 2007 FLD2007 -06020 — Page 5 of 13 9 0 sight visibility triangles. The proposed site and building design includes a portion of the building within a sight visibility triangle on the north side of the driveway on Hamden Drive. Concern with the building being located within the visibility triangle is minimized by the fact that the driveway at this location is for ingress to the parking garage. Concern with parking located within the visibility triangle at the exit driveway on 50' Street is also minimized by the site design with the public sidewalk along 5`h Street being at the curb line of 5`h Street, providing an adequate and safe distance for motorists to see pedestrians on the sidewalk prior to exiting. Screen walls for the surface parking along the south side of the property are proposed at a maximum height of 30- inches, meeting the Code requirement for structures within the visibility triangles. The intent of the sight visibility triangles is to enable those vehicles and/or pedestrians traversing a right - of -way and those vehicles stopped at a stop bar while leaving a site to have a clear and unobstructed view of one another. The proposed encroachments will not result in a conflict with this intent, as those vehicles exiting the surface parking area on the south side of the property will still have adequate and safe clear and unobstructed view of vehicles and/or pedestrians traversing 5`h Street. These encroachments upon the sight visibility triangles will not result in the grant of a special privilege as similar reductions have been approved elsewhere under similar circumstances. It is noted that the City's Engineering Department has indicated support for this request. Based upon the above, positive findings can be made with respect to allowing the small encroachment within the driveway's sight visibility triangles as set forth in Section 3 -904.A of the Community Development Code. Utilities: Pursuant to Section 3 -911 of the Community Development Code, for development that does not involve a subdivision, all utilities including individual distribution lines shall be installed underground unless such undergrounding is not practicable.' The civil site plan for this proposal indicates that all on- site electric and communication lines will be placed underground in conformance with this Code requirement. There do exist overhead utility lines along the eastern portion of the frontage along 5`h Street for Parcel B, which feed the businesses through the north/south center of the property. The overhead lines that are along the eastern half of Parcel B along 5`h Street interconnect with overhead utility lines along the east side of Hamden Drive. These overhead utility lines running through the middle of Parcel B will need to be removed to provide for the construction of the parking garage. The overhead lines along the east half of Parcel B on the north side of 5`h Street will also need to be placed underground as part of the construction of this parking garage. There are no overhead utility lines within the Coronado Drive right -of -way, having been placed underground as part of the Beach Walk project. Landscaping: Pursuant to Section 3- 1202.D of the Community Development Code, there are no perimeter buffers required in the Tourist District for this site. While the request has been advertised with a reduction to required interior landscaping from 10 to 3.7 percent, recalculation of the provided interior landscape area indicates 16.7 percent of the vehicular use area. Therefore, no reduction is now necessary. Pursuant to Section 3- 1202.E.2, a foundation landscape area of a minimum five -foot width is required along the building frontages facing Coronado Drive, Hamden Drive and 5`h Street. Foundation landscaping is being provided along Coronado Drive and Hamden Drive. The proposal includes a reduction to required foundation landscaping on the south side of the parking garage from five to two feet, as a Comprehensive Landscape Program, under the provisions of Section 3- 1202.G. The two -foot dimension is at the column locations only. The foundation landscape width otherwise is four feet. The screen walls and the interior landscaping compensate the reduction along the south side of the parking garage building provided between the parking area and the south property line along 5`h Street. Landscaping otherwise exceeds Code requirements elsewhere on -site. Landscaping is proposed along all sides of the parking garage to help soften the building's appearance. Washingtonia palms are proposed along the north, west and south sides of the site. Magnolia trees are Community Development Board — August 21, 2007 FLD2007 -06020 — Page 6 of 13 planned at the street intersections at the southwest and southeast corners of the site. Crape myrtle trees are planned along the south and east sides of the building. Ligustrum trees are proposed at the northwest and northeast corners of the site. A hedge of viburnum will be planted along the north, west and east sides of the building, whereas India hawthorn will be planted on the outside of the screen wall along 5th Street. Between the property lines and the viburnum hedges on the east and west sides of the parking garage, India hawthorn will also be planted to create a tiered landscaping effect. Fakahatchee grass is proposed within the 5t" Street and Hamden Drive rights -of -way between the property lines and the public sidewalks. Undergrounding the existing overhead utility lines along the east half of Parcel B along 5th Street will not restrict the types and heights of trees proposed along this roadway. Comprehensive Landscape Program: Pursuant to Section 3- 1.202.G of the Community Development Code, the landscaping requirements contained within the Code can be waived or modified if the application contains a Comprehensive Landscape Program satisfying certain criteria. The following table depicts the consistency of the development proposal with those criteria: The reduction to the foundation landscaping along the south side of the parking garage building is included in the Comprehensive Landscape Program request and is essentially a reduction from five to four feet in width, because the reduction to a two -foot width is only at the building columns. As expressed above, the proposed Comprehensive Landscape Program has been found to be consistent with all applicable criteria, as discussed above. Solid Waste: Trash cans are proposed adjacent to the stairwells on each level of the parking garage. Based on the amount of trash generated at other parking garages, one black barrel trash container is sufficient for this site. This trash barrel will be stored inside the parking garage on the ground floor and will be wheeled to the Hamden Drive right -of -way on trash days. The proposal has been found to be acceptable by the City's Solid Waste Department. Si tg_iage: No freestanding or attached signage is proposed at this time for the parking garage. Signage for the residential project under FLD2005 -0202 1 /TDR2005 -03 020 was restricted to the following: Community Development Board — August 21, 2007 FLD2007 -06020 — Page 7 of 13 Consistent Inconsistent 1. Architectural theme: a. The landscaping.in a comprehensive landscape program shall be designed as a N/A N/A part of the architectural theme of the principle buildings proposed or developed on the parcel proposed for development; or b. The design, character, location and/or materials of the landscape treatment X proposed in the comprehensive landscape program shall be demonstrably more attractive than landscaping otherwise permitted on the parcel proposed for development under the minimum landscape standards. 2. Lighting: Any lighting proposed as, a part of a comprehensive landscape program is N/A N/A automatically controlled so that the lighting is turned off when the business is closed. 3. Community character: The landscape treatment proposed in the comprehensive X landscape program will enhance the community character of the City of Clearwater. 4. Property values: The landscape treatment proposed in the comprehensive landscape X program will have a beneficial impact on the value of property in the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. 5. Special area or scenic corridor plan: The landscape treatment proposed in the N/A N/A comprehensive landscape program is consistent with any special area or scenic corridor plan which the City of Clearwater has prepared and adopted for the area in which the parcel proposed for development is located. The reduction to the foundation landscaping along the south side of the parking garage building is included in the Comprehensive Landscape Program request and is essentially a reduction from five to four feet in width, because the reduction to a two -foot width is only at the building columns. As expressed above, the proposed Comprehensive Landscape Program has been found to be consistent with all applicable criteria, as discussed above. Solid Waste: Trash cans are proposed adjacent to the stairwells on each level of the parking garage. Based on the amount of trash generated at other parking garages, one black barrel trash container is sufficient for this site. This trash barrel will be stored inside the parking garage on the ground floor and will be wheeled to the Hamden Drive right -of -way on trash days. The proposal has been found to be acceptable by the City's Solid Waste Department. Si tg_iage: No freestanding or attached signage is proposed at this time for the parking garage. Signage for the residential project under FLD2005 -0202 1 /TDR2005 -03 020 was restricted to the following: Community Development Board — August 21, 2007 FLD2007 -06020 — Page 7 of 13 9 0 That all signage meet the requirements of Code and be limited to signs attached directly to the building and be architecturally - integrated with the design of the building with regard to proportion, color, material and finish as part of a final Comprehensive Sign Program package (as required) submitted to and approved by Staff prior to the issuance of any sign permits which includes that: a. All signs be designed as part of an overall theme that respect, enhance and contribute to the architectural style, detailing and elements of a building; b. All signs consist of design, colors, materials, size, shape and methods of illumination which reinforce the overall design of the faeade; c. All attached signs are installed so the method of installation is concealed or made an integral part of the design of the sign; d. All wall signs be located on flat, unadorned parts of a faeade such as the horizontal band between the storefront and second floor or on windows, awning flaps, fascia, etc.; and e. The letter size, letter and word spacing, font style and other design elements of all signs create an overall high quality aesthetic appearance. Freestanding signage in the Tourist District is restricted to a maximum height of four feet, or six feet through a Comprehensive Sign Program. Any approval of this parking garage application should include a condition allowing for freestanding signage, where such future freestanding signage must be a monument -style sign meeting Code requirements and be designed to match the exterior materials and color of the building. Code Enforcement Analysis: There is a current Code Enforcement case for unpermitted outdoor display and sales of merchandise at 325 South Gulfview Boulevard (CDC2007- 01357). There is a current exterior maintenance and outdoor storage case for 326 Coronado Drive (CDC2007- 00355), as well as possible unsafe conditions or housing problems (HOU2007- 00031). Community Development Board — August 21, 2007 FLD2007 -06020 — Page 8 of 13 • • COMPLIANCE WITH STANDARDS AND CRITERIA: The following table depicts the consistency of the development proposal with the standards as per Tables 2 -801.1 and 2 -802 of the Community Development Code: Per Termination of Status of Nonconformity, conversion calculations and Transfer of Development Rights under FLD2005- 02021/TDR2005 -03020 2 See analysis in Staff Report Community Development Board — August 21, 2007 FLD2007 -06020 — Page 9 of 13 Standard Proposed Consistent Inconsistent F.A.R. 1.0 None X I.S.R. 0.95 Parcels A & B: 0.86 X Density 30 dwelling units per acre Parcel A: 43.03 du /acre X1 Lot Area Attached dwellings: 10,000 sq. ft. Parcel A (attached X Parking Garage & Lot: 20,000 sq. ft. dwellings): 61,212 sq. ft. Parcel B: 40,546 sq. ft. Lot Width Parcel B (Parking Garage & Lot): 100 West: 183.86 feet X feet South: 220 feet X East: 184.74 feet X Setbacks Front: 15 feet West: 15 feet (to X building) South: 4.4 feet (to screen X2 wall); 5.5 feet (to pavement) East: 12.7 feet (to X2 building) Side: 10 feet North: 14.25 feet (to X building) Height 50 feet 51.35 feet (to top parking X2 deck) Off - Street Attached dwellings: Two spaces per unit Parcel A: 187 spaces X2 Parking (204 spaces) Parcel B: 17 spaces for attached dwellings on Parcel A; 300 public spaces; 60 spaces developer controlled Per Termination of Status of Nonconformity, conversion calculations and Transfer of Development Rights under FLD2005- 02021/TDR2005 -03020 2 See analysis in Staff Report Community Development Board — August 21, 2007 FLD2007 -06020 — Page 9 of 13 COMPLIANCE WITH FLEXIBILITY CRITERIA: The following table depicts the consistency of the development proposal with the Flexibility criteria as per Section 2 -803.0 of the Community Development Code (Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project): Community Development Board — August 21, 2007 FLD2007 -06020 —Page 10 of 13 Consistent Inconsistent 1. The development or redevelopment is otherwise impractical without deviations from X the use and /or development standards set forth in this zoning district. 2. The development or redevelopment will be consistent with the goals and policies of X the Comprehensive Plan, as well as with the general purpose, intent and basic planning objectives of this Code, and with the intent and purpose of this zoning district. 3. The development or redevelopment will not impede the normal and orderly X development and improvement of surrounding properties. 4. Adjoining properties will not suffer substantial detriment as a result of the proposed X development 5. The proposed use shall otherwise be permitted by the underlying future land use X category, be compatible with adjacent land uses, will not substantially alter the essential use characteristics of the neighborhood; and shall demonstrate compliance with one or more of the following objectives: a. The proposed use is permitted in this zoning district as a minimum standard, flexible standard or flexible development use; b. The proposed use would be a significant economic contributor to the City's economic base by diversifying the local economy or by creating jobs; c. The development proposal accommodates the expansion or redevelopment of an existing economic contributor; d. The proposed use provides for the provision of affordable housing; e. The proposed use provides for development or redevelopment in an area that is characterized by other similar development and where a land use plan amendment and rezoning would result in a spot land use or zoning designation; or f. The proposed use provides for the development of a new and/or preservation of a working waterfront use. 6. Flexibility with regard to use, lot width, required setbacks, height and off - street X parking are justified based on demonstrated compliance with all of the following design objectives: a. The proposed development will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of the surrounding properties for uses permitted in this zoning district; b. The proposed development complies with applicable design guidelines adopted by the City; c. The design, scale and intensity of the proposed development supports the established or emerging character of an area; d. In order to form a cohesive, visually interesting and attractive appearance, the proposed development incorporates a substantial number of the following design elements: ❑ Changes in horizontal building planes; • Use of architectural details such as columns, cornices, stringcourses, pilasters, porticos, balconies, railings, awnings, etc.; • Variety in materials, colors and textures; • Distinctive fenestration patterns; ❑ Building stepbacks; and ❑ Distinctive roofs forms. e. The proposed development provides for appropriate buffers, enhanced landscape design and appropriate distances between buildings. Community Development Board — August 21, 2007 FLD2007 -06020 —Page 10 of 13 9 0 COMPLIANCE WITH GENERAL STANDARDS FOR LEVEL TWO APPROVALS: The following table depicts the consistency of the development proposal with the General Standards for Level Two Approvals as per Section 3 -913 of the Community Development Code: SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION: The Development Review Committee (DRC) reviewed the application and supporting materials at its meetings of July 5, 2007, and deemed the development proposal to be sufficient to move forward to the Community Development Board (CDB), based upon the following findings of fact and conclusions of law: Findings of Fact: 1. The 2.37 total acres is generally located between S. Gulfview Blvd. and Coronado Dr. west of Brightwater Blvd. (Parcel A), between Coronado Dr. & Hamden Dr. north of 5th St. (Parcel B) and east of Hamden Dr. north of 5th St. (Parcel C); 2. On July 19, 2005, the Community Development Board (CDB) approved with 15 conditions Case Nos. FLD2005- 02021 /TDR2005 -03020 to permit a total of 102 attached dwellings, with 92 dwelling units in a 148 -foot tall building on Parcel A and 10 dwelling units in a 64 -foot tall building on Parcel B, which included the Termination of Status of Nonconformity (equivalent of 119 hotel units [116 hotel units and three dwelling units] where 93 hotel units are permitted), the conversion of these hotel units to residential units and the Transfer of Development Rights of 18 hotel units from 401 Coronado Drive and 406, Hamden Drive (donor sites); 3. On August 13, 2007, the Planning Director approved with 13 conditions a Minor Revision, under the provisions of Section 4- 406.A, relocating the 10 dwelling units approved on Parcel B to Parcel A, so that Parcel A will have all 102 dwelling units approved under the original application, and Parcel B will only have accessory parking located on it (the balance between the 187 parking spaces provided on Parcel A and that necessary to provide overall required parking for the 102 dwelling units at a rate of two parking spaces per unit [total of 204 spaces]); 4. The proposal is to add the use of Parking Garage and Lot for 377 spaces to Parcel B (located between Coronado Drive and Hamden Drive, north of 5th Street) to a previously approved project of 102 attached dwelling units (FLD2005- 02021 /TDR2005- 03020); . 5. Parcel B will provide 17 parking spaces for the attached dwellings on Parcel A; 6. Of the 377 parking spaces being provided on Parcel B, 300 parking spaces are intended to be sold to the City for public parking. Of the remaining 77 parking spaces, 50 spaces will be at ground level and 27 spaces will be on the 6"' floor, all for use by the developer /owner; Community Development Board — August 21, 2007 FLD2007 -06020 —Page 11 of 13 Consistent Inconsistent 1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, X coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage development and use of X adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons X residing or working in the neighborhood. 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. X 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the X immediate vicinity. 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including X visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts on adjacent properties. SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION: The Development Review Committee (DRC) reviewed the application and supporting materials at its meetings of July 5, 2007, and deemed the development proposal to be sufficient to move forward to the Community Development Board (CDB), based upon the following findings of fact and conclusions of law: Findings of Fact: 1. The 2.37 total acres is generally located between S. Gulfview Blvd. and Coronado Dr. west of Brightwater Blvd. (Parcel A), between Coronado Dr. & Hamden Dr. north of 5th St. (Parcel B) and east of Hamden Dr. north of 5th St. (Parcel C); 2. On July 19, 2005, the Community Development Board (CDB) approved with 15 conditions Case Nos. FLD2005- 02021 /TDR2005 -03020 to permit a total of 102 attached dwellings, with 92 dwelling units in a 148 -foot tall building on Parcel A and 10 dwelling units in a 64 -foot tall building on Parcel B, which included the Termination of Status of Nonconformity (equivalent of 119 hotel units [116 hotel units and three dwelling units] where 93 hotel units are permitted), the conversion of these hotel units to residential units and the Transfer of Development Rights of 18 hotel units from 401 Coronado Drive and 406, Hamden Drive (donor sites); 3. On August 13, 2007, the Planning Director approved with 13 conditions a Minor Revision, under the provisions of Section 4- 406.A, relocating the 10 dwelling units approved on Parcel B to Parcel A, so that Parcel A will have all 102 dwelling units approved under the original application, and Parcel B will only have accessory parking located on it (the balance between the 187 parking spaces provided on Parcel A and that necessary to provide overall required parking for the 102 dwelling units at a rate of two parking spaces per unit [total of 204 spaces]); 4. The proposal is to add the use of Parking Garage and Lot for 377 spaces to Parcel B (located between Coronado Drive and Hamden Drive, north of 5th Street) to a previously approved project of 102 attached dwelling units (FLD2005- 02021 /TDR2005- 03020); . 5. Parcel B will provide 17 parking spaces for the attached dwellings on Parcel A; 6. Of the 377 parking spaces being provided on Parcel B, 300 parking spaces are intended to be sold to the City for public parking. Of the remaining 77 parking spaces, 50 spaces will be at ground level and 27 spaces will be on the 6"' floor, all for use by the developer /owner; Community Development Board — August 21, 2007 FLD2007 -06020 —Page 11 of 13 • • 7. The proposal includes reductions to the front (south along 5th Street) setback from 15 feet to 4.4 feet (to screen wall) and to 5.5 feet (to pavement) and a reduction to the front (east along Hamden Drive) from 15 feet to 12.7 feet (to building); 8. Proposed setbacks are consistent with existing setbacks for other projects in close proximity within this urban context; 9. The proposed parking garage building has been designed at a height of 51.35 feet to the highest garage floor from Base Flood Elevation (BFE); 10. The accessory parking garage and attached dwellings originally approved on this Parcel B under FLD2005- 02021 /TDR2005 -03020 was to be at a height of 64 feet; 11. The proposed parking garage building height is consistent with the Code and with other projects approved (but yet to be constructed), under construction or already constructed within the surrounding area; 12. Unless the architect can provide documentation at the building permit stage that the stair /elevator towers must exceed the maximum height of 16 feet to the 20 feet proposed, these two towers should be required to be reduced to the maximum height of 16 feet; 13. These overhead utility lines running through the middle of Parcel B will need to be removed to provide for the construction of the parking garage. The overhead lines along the east half of Parcel B on the north side of 5a' Street will also need to be placed underground as .part of the construction of this parking garage; 14. While the request has been advertised with a reduction to required interior landscaping from 10 to 3.7 percent, recalculation of, the provided interior landscape area indicates 16.7 percent of the vehicular use area; 15. The proposal includes a reduction to required foundation landscaping on the south side of the parking garage from five to two feet, where the two -foot dimension is at the column locations only. The foundation landscape width otherwise is four feet. Proposed site landscaping justifies the requested reduction to the foundation landscape width; and 16. There are current Code Enforcement cases at 325 South Gulfview Boulevard and at 326 Coronado Drive. Conclusions of Law: 1. That the development proposal is consistent with the Standards as per Tables 2 -801.1 and 2 -802 of the Community Development Code; 2. That the development proposal is consistent with the Flexibility criteria as per Section 2 -803.0 of the Community Development Code; 3. That the development proposal is consistent with the General Standards for Level Two Approvals as per Section 3 -913 of the Community Development Code; and 4. That the development proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Landscape Program criteria as per Section 3- 1202.G of the Community Development Code. Based upon the above, the Planning Department recommends APPROVAL of the Flexible Development application in the Tourist District to permit the addition of a Parking Garage and Lot of 377 spaces to Parcel "B" (located between Coronado Drive and Hamden Drive, north of 5th Street) to a previously approved project of 102 attached dwelling units (FLD2005- 02021 /TDR2005 -03020 approved by the CDB on July 19, 2005), with reductions to the front (south along 5th Street) setback from 15 feet to 4.4 feet (to screen wall) and to 5.5 feet (to pavement), a reduction to the front (east along Hamden Drive) from 15 feet to 12.7 feet (to building) and an increase to building height from 35 feet to 51.35 feet (to top parking deck), as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2- 803.C, with a reduction to required foundation landscaping on the south side of the parking garage from Community Development Board — August 21, 2007 FLD2007 -06020 — Page 12 of 13 r � five to two feet, as a Comprehensive Landscape Program, under the provisions of Section 3- 1202.G, with the following conditions: Conditions of Approval: 1. That approval of this Flexible Development case is subject to the approval of a Development Agreement with the City; 2. That all prior conditions of approval under FLD2005 -02021 by the CDB and under the Minor Revision are still applicable, except as modified through this application approval; 3. That the final design and color of the parking garage building be consistent with the conceptual elevations submitted to, or as modified by, the CDB; 4. That, unless the architect can provide documentation at the building permit stage that the stair /elevator towers must exceed the maximum height of 16 feet to the 20 feet proposed, these two towers be reduced to the maximum height of 16 feet prior to the issuance of the building permit; 5. That a Declaration of Unity of Title (for condominiums) for Parcels A, B and C be recorded in the public records prior to the issuance of any permits; 6. That a condominium plat be recorded prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy; 7. That all utility equipment, including but not limited to wireless communication facilities, electrical and gas meters, etc., be screened from view and/or painted to match the building to which they are attached, as applicable, prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy; 8. That existing overhead utility lines running north/south through Parcel B and along the east half of Parcel B on the north side of 5`" Street be placed underground prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy for the parking garage; 9. That any air conditioning unit for the small office on the ground floor be wall mounted and not placed on the outside wall of the parking garage building; 10. That freestanding and attached signage for the parking garage meet the requirements of the Code and any freestanding sign be monument - style, designed to match the exterior materials and color of the parking garage building; 11. That, prior to the issuance of any permit, compliance with all requirements of Stormwater Engineering be met; 12. That all Fire Department requirements be met prior to the issuance of any permits; 13. That any applicable Public Art and Design Impact Fee be paid prior to the issuance of any permits; and 14. That all Parks and Recreation fees be paid prior to the issuance of any permits. Prepared by Planning Department Staff: waoeu_ /I - " Wayne M ells, AICP, Planner III ATTACHMENTS: ❑ Location Map ❑ Aerial Map ❑ Zoning Map • Existing Surrounding Uses Map • Photographs of Site and Vicinity S:IPlanning DepartmentlCD BIFLEX (FLD)IPending cases)Up for the next CDkGulfview S 0325 Marbella (T) 2007- 8.21.07 CDB - WWIGulfview S 325 StaffReport.doc Community Development Board — August 21, 2007 FLD2007 -06020 — Page 13 of 13 • ED2 � h >° FIRST ST J � CD o pF THIRD sr DR. w o 3 ° ° � z PROJECT �° SITE � ° BRIGHT WATER DR FIFTH ST 2 u� BAYSIDE r �R CBgYwgY / s a� Location Map Owner: Lucca Development LLC Case: FLD2007 -06020 Site: 325 S. Gulfview Blvd., 326, 345, 347 and 353 Property 2.37 Coronado Dr. and 350 Hamden Dr. Size (Acres): j 07- 29 -15- 52380 - 000 -0630 07- 29 -15- 52380 - 000 -1110 08- 29 -15- 17586 -001 -0120 PIN: 08- 29 -15- 17586 -001 -0130 08- 29 -15- 17586 -001 -0140 08- 29- 15- 17604- 000 -0080 08- 29 -15- 17604- 000 -0100 Atlas Page: 276A 0 0 7MJ ll� lkW Aerial Map Owner: Lucc:i De- e opment LLC— Case: FLMCC-7-1-',fC21'., Site: 32E S. -:,ijr-view Elv--., 16, 345, 347 and K3 PropeTty 2.37 C.:Ncradc D-, end 1`50 Hamden Dr. Size(A--rD;): 0; -29 -15 2C8(,-CCC-C631: 0- -29 -15 2,:8cl-ccc- 111 C 0;,-29-15- - 7MC-CM -C 121: DIN: 0E-29-15-- 7E8c,CGl -C 13C 0&-29-15-- 7E8o-CC1 -C 141 0 €- 29 -15 7q0--CC-00K 0 €.29 -15 7,T--C Cl-C 10 Atlas Forge; 27 SA • — — — — _ — — --r --j 230 12 LL 'THIRD 2 - - - _ ST 1 _ _ _ _ 30 1 d,- - 12 V2 30 1 251 - - - - - 10�'j 301 - - - - I - 1 30 60 -N 13 35 59 - - - - - - - 106 w LU 30 c y - -- 14 305 - Q- 305 2 1 2 y 60 - - - _ 309 _ 309 - _ '- - Q 3 - - 15 31181 108 312 0 I 1A - ` - - 315 109 316 T 3154 16 1 - - 62 = 6 1 17 _ 110 320 2A L_22380 63 CD 18 �� - - 111 326 cif - ti 323 76 - 1 64 P _ F,ZS 6 9 P 3?2 " 3 3A 113 32565 \ ` 20 - - - - 1 4 330 — r— —1 06446' 4A 114 _/8 165910 _1 66 - _ 10 3339 5 332 - 21 333 115 ` 10 6 ` 39§7 56 y//''�L� //T�- 67 ` V I.Jf u \16 - '1 \ \ - 347 \ - 68 o 1 2 ^ d 3 8 117 34 _ _ 34769 ^ BR /GHT�I�/A ` - =3 34311 7 342 7 D ER 118 1 119 9 -1 r'$ — `4 35 70 348 34512 346 345 25 F4 L IRFQ- 70 ` 2 3 4 ' ., - - \ 35571 120 353 13 9 34g 6o 5 5 8 1 A 26 ` 8 FIFTH ST 14 10 35p 26 1/2 ` ` 401 90A 1— - - ` 72 121 s �— P 06445* 17640 - - - -- -_ 401 27 1 J - 73 122 12 406 9 T— —1 28 411 - 4052 Q 1-A 74 11 88438 - - - 409 75 124 3 10 29 - _ - - - � q1 p Q`V 1 ° - - - - - - 410 � 125 - 15 1762 � g 76 ° L 5 I -412 126 ^ I y - - _ 42177 I 5 A 420 4>5 BA YS /DE D R 31 127 420 431 78 � � 2 Zoning Map Owner: Lucca Development LLC Case: FLD2007 -06020 Site: 325 S. Gulfview Blvd., 326, 345, 347 and 353 Property Coronado Dr. and 350 Hamden Dr. Size(Acres): 2.37 07- 29 -15- 52380 - 000 -0630 07-29-15-52380-000-1110 08- 29 -15- 17586- 001 -0120 PIN: 08- 29 -15- 17586 -001 -0130 08- 29 -15- 17586 -001 -0140 08- 29 -15- 17604 - 000 -0080 08- 29 -15- 17604 - 000 -0100 Atlas Page: 276A 9 0 J 230 50 12 vernlg _ - 2 /RD ST 70 c�dffimo a - ri – _ 12 1/2 58 1 251 2 – – _ 1 12 13 – I 59 – – 3011 3 Yernl ht w – – _ _ 106 w 30 – – m 305 – acnm odatl S _ each 60 – – les u ant p A& t 1A _ _ _15 3f Ctall108 312 0 _ 16 ` 315 _ 109 316 – 62 Q 31y4 1 _ 16 – _ 17 _ 110 320 1 O 2A _ _ ?380 – 326 1 8 76 23 �'26 64 ' ,, 19 332 – – ><h 2 7 _ 3A F— — _ 32$5 1`3 odafio 6 F-- --j [_�646' 20 � � _ – 1 114 ` 4 330 331 Jg 65910 � – 66 – _ _ 21 333 115 70 33390 5 332 Ove nh>t� 67 _ �aeh_ „s \ D 6 – _ a,-,- mmogati s – `22 \ – 347 \ ht 117 " ° 1 2 " ,� a – a68jra _ – 23 \ – 347 a oda342 s 9 7 BR/ GHTwAT ER DR 118 24 \ , 351 119 34592 _ 70 348 9 -15d 346 ¢g h ^ VeI \ – J 25 LIRFC� m acco M Atians i A ac e e#6hyhodatl S 353 13 9 3 a 60 d e ss 26 FIFTH ST 14 10 – 8 261/2 ` \ – 401 350 n T0A - _ _ – Verwg$t 121 1— —I X445' 27 ccOTMbOLl s 4p� �c..� a 17640 - - Reach _ /- - ern>< g 12 406 9 — 1 26 �yl _ - c 4052 _ ddtion 4 1-A 88438 - - 75 124 409 3 10 Z ttache 29 - – – l— – – – – – – – + Ver g4t25 410 Q Wdlin CtTllll " 1 2 I)e ach d 4 5 I 1 151762 41 30 a commvdatio �9 Z o o el gs ' " 4 — — — — — — — 42," l 126 ccom OBI ' HS 415 SA YS /DE DR I 31 127 420 – 431 78 ' 2 h � n Existing Surrounding Land Uses Map Owner; Lucca Development LLC Case; FLD2007 -06020 Site, 325S. Gulfview Blvd„ 326, 345, 347 and 353 Property 2.37 Coronado Dr. and 350 Hamden Dr. Size(Acres); 07- 29 -15- 52380 - 000 -0630 07-29-15-52380-000-1110 08- 29 -15- 17586 - 001 -0120 PIN; 08- 29 -15- 17586- 001 -0130 08- 29 -15- 17586 - 001 -0140 08- 29- 15- 17604- 000 -0080 08- 29 -15- 17604 - 000 -0100 Atlas Page; 276A Parcel A - View looking NE at 325 S. Gulfview 31vd. from S. Gulfview Blvd. Parcel A - View looking NW at 325 S. Gulfview Blvd. from Coronado Dr. Parcel A - View looking west at 326 Coronado Dr. from Coronado Dr. Parcel B - View looking east at 345 Coronado Dr. from Coronado Dr. Farcel B - View looking SE at 347 & 353 Coronado Parcel B - View looking north at 353 Coronado Dr. Dr. from Coronado Dr. from corner of 5th St. & Coronado Dr. ?25 South Gulfview Boulevard, 326, 345, 347 and 353 Coronado Drive and 350 Hamden Drive FLD2007 -06020 Page 1 of 4 Parcel B - View looking NW at 353 Coronado Dr. from corner of 5th St. & Hamden Dr. Parcel C - View looking east at subject site with existing docks from Hamden Dr. View looking NE from S. Gulfview Blvd. at adjacent development to the north of Parcel A S. Gulfview Blvd. north of P-,rc el A 325 South Gulfview Boulevard, 326, 345, 347 and 353 Coronado • Parcel B - View loo -sing NW it 350 Hamden Dr. from Hamden Dr. Parcel C - View looting east Lt 3ubje:t site with existing docks from Hamden Dr. Drive and 350 Hamden Drive FLD2007 -06020 Page 2 of 4 View looki -ig west from S. Gulfview Blvd. at Beach Pat i __on west of Parcel A Ask View looking east from S. Gulfview Blvd. at existing building to the south of Parcel A View looking NE from Coronado Dr. at 3_21 Coronado Dr. to the NE of Parcel A View looking east from Coronado Dr. at existing View looking SE from Coronado Dr. at existing developmeri-, to the east of Parcel A development to the east of Parcel A 325 South tsulfview Boulevard, 326, 345, 347 and 353 Coronado Drive and 350 Hamden Drive Page 3 of 4 FLD2007 -06020 view iooking �s w trom Uoronado Or. at existing development to the south of Parcel A View looking SW from Coronado Dr. at ex. dev. on SW corner of Coronado Dr. & nth St. • development to the south of Parcel B View looking west from Coronado Dr. at existing development to the west of Parcel B • - �34� 3 s J( View looking SW from Hamden Dr. at existing View looking south from Hamden Dr. at 100 development to the south of Parcel B Bayside Dr. SE of Parcel B & south of Parcel C 325 South Gulfview Boulevard, 326, 345, 347 and 353 Coronado Drive and 350 Hamden Drive Page 4 of 4 FLD2007 -06020 00 00 Page 1 of 1 Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Friday, August 17, 2007 1:07 PM To: 'Carl Wagenfohr' Cc: Delk, Michael; Castelli, Joelle Wiley Subject: RE: Lucca garage development agreement? Carl - Yes, a development agreement is anticipated, but has yet to be submitted for review and approval. Once it has been submitted, it would be available. I do not have a time frame for when it will be submitted. It will require CDB review and recommendation prior to a decision by City Council. Wayne - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Carl Wagenfohr [ mailto :carl @clearwatergazette.com] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2007 12:52 PM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: Lucca garage development agreement? Wayne, I notice that FLD2007 -06020 implies that the city will purchase 300 of the parking spaces, but that there is no reference to any development agreement that documents the relationship between the city & Lucca. Is there a development agreement forthcoming, and when might I be able to have a copy? Carl Wagenfohr, Clearwater Gazette 8/17/2007 Wells, Wayne • From: Delk, Michael Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2007 2:19 PM To: Wells, Wayne; Clayton, Gina Subject: FW: Lucca Meeting Importance: High Sir Wayne - FYI. Michael L. Delk, AICP Planning Director City of Clearwater, Florida myclearwater.com - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Irwin, Rod Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2007 1:30 PM To: Akin, Pam Cc: Horne, William; Delk, Michael Subject: FW: Lucca Meeting Importance: High FYI re: the Lucca mtg. last week. Let me know if you want to discuss /clarify. - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Bruch, Tracey Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2007 10:23 AM To: Irwin, Rod Subject: RE: Lucca Meeting • Page 1 of 4 Rod: This is the response from Haahs & Assoc. (Roomy Valera). If you would like to have a conference call with them to discuss, please let me know and I will arrange. Tracey Rod's email to Pam is on target. There can be no financial deal in place until real cost assumptions have been determined by both parties (you can establish parameters, but its hard to commit). We can agree to develop the parking garage with the developer, but the soft cost and pre - development numbers have to be disclosed. Further, we now have evidence that what they say is a set cost can change as the process continues to move forward (developers fee is now 18 %). Its difficult to establish each others financial commitments with out a true assessment of what it will cost. You have to understand the financial burden that the project can and will add to the city's coffers. If you look at this project as a revitalization project for the entire area, then you can make financial commitments that may consider a short/long term subside, but you need to do so before the project is designed and built. 8/8/2007 ,^ ,� • • Page 2 of 4 -The land cost appraisal that the developers has is not comparable with the City's, since the land has been stripped of development density. - 18% developer fee is extremely unreasonable and cause to walk away from the deal. -The City will have much more say if you control the entire process (including design), since you will own 75% or greater of the parking component with the future vertical expansion of the garage. -You can exclude the following: - developers fee - parking garage consultant - owners representative /program managers fee - construction loan fees (if bonded, the city will have some income interest during construction) -Plan review fees - Permit fees -city utility fees -legal fees (may not have to share on developers expense- depend on city legal staff) -real estate taxes -You will control and better manage the following: -A &E fees including civil, survey, landscaping, soils testing, environments, etc - closing cost on construction (bonds) - property insurance I hope this helps. Again, I am available to discuss further with you 8/8/2007 �, ,� • • Page 3 of 4 and Rod. Tracey Bruch, CAPP Parking Manager (727) 562 -4771 tracey.bruch @myclearwater.com - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Irwin, Rod Sent: Friday, August 03, 2007 11:59 AM To: Akin, Pam Cc: Horne, William; Bruch, Tracey; Delk, Michael Subject: Lucca Meeting Pam - Bill asked that I share with you my thoughts coming out of the Lucca meeting yesterday. Here they are: 1) Turnkey proposal I am attaching a copy of a preliminary response from Haahs on the cost checklist provided by Lucca. As you can see, we need to see specifics for each category in order to determine the appropriate level of cost assignment. The categories are only part of the answer. It is not unreasonable that they have project budget figures at this point; otherwise, how do they themselves determine feasibility ? ( What is the basis for their statement yesterday that hard construction costs are $21,000 /space ?) Those bullets need to be quantified to #'s /% off a base construction cost per space to allow us to estimate total cost.. It seems they are unwilling to spend the money to generate these #'s. Alternately, you might speak to them about presenting the Term Sheet to Council to get feedback on there receptivity to "up to 30, 000 /space , based upon actual construction cost and apportioned land value. This might give them the comfort level to proceed to generate the 30% design drawings Haahs needs to establish cost. The foundation reinforcement, of course, would be additional(if included). If they were not willing to commit to the term sheet provisions, with an evidence of Council receptivity, then we know that we have a different issue to address and proceed accordingly. 2) Property Acquisition I think it is worth you considering a conversation with the councilmembers, perhaps during your one -on- one's, to explore whether, over the long run, we might be better served to pay an additional property acquisition cost and construct the facility ourselves. We might even realize some development cost savings over a turnkey development(permit costs, overhead for construction, etc.)that could reduce the margin. I have asked Tracey to discuss with Haahs and see what they feel. In either case, I think we have significantly higher risk during construction with an outside party that, the avoidance of same, could justify part of the incremental cost and raise the probability that we get a product that we are comfortable. with as a City facility on the beach. Hope this helps! Let me know if you have a question. Rod Irwin 8/8/2007 L 9 . Page 4 of 4 Assistant City Manager for Economic Development City of Clearwater 112 So. Osceola Ave. Clearwater, Florida 33756 727 - 562 - 4058(0) 727 - 562- 4052(F) rod.irwin @myclearwater.com 8/8/2007 Wells, Wayne From: Kambourolias, Sam Sent: Tuesday, August 07, 2007 12:34 PM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: RE: Map Request - FLD2007- 06020, 325 S. Gulfview Blvd. TN In T Gulfview S 325 Gulfview S 325 Gulfview S 325 Gulfview S 325 Aerial Map.doc_xisting Surrou.ocation Map.doZoning Map.doc - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Thursday, August 02, 2007 8:12 AM To: Kambourolias, Sam Cc: Herman, Jason Subject: Map Request - FLD2007- 06020, 325 S. Gulfview Blvd. Sam - I am attaching four maps you previously did back in May 2005 for Cases FLD2005-03020/TDR2005-03021/PLT2005- 00010 (1 have copied them for this new, application and have changed /updated the case number and other information at the bottom). I understand that I will lose the information on the Existing Surrounding Uses Map (I will redo later). Could you update the north arrow on all of these maps to be more readable and could you update the aerial map if there is a more recent aerial view? If possible, could you update these maps by August 10, 2007? Thanks. Wayne << Filer Gulfview S 325 Aerial Map.doc >> << File: Gulfview S 325 Existing Surrounding Uses Map.doc >> << File: Gulfview S 325 Location Map.doc >> << File: Gulfview S 325 Zoning Map.doc >> Message • . Page 1 of 5 Wells, Wayne From: Bruch, Tracey Sent: Monday, August 06, 2007 12:00 PM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: FW: Ed- Proposed City Garage Cost Per your Request as discussed. Tracey Bruch, CAPP Parking Manager (727) 562 -4771 tracey.bruch @myclearwater.com - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Bruch, Tracey Sent: Tuesday, July 31, 2007 11:56 AM To: Irwin, Rod Cc: Quillen, Michael Subject: FW: Ed- Proposed City Garage Cost Per your Request Rod: See Haahs' response below. Also, we should make sure that dependent on the detail of the plans that enough contingency is included, e.g. we would want more contingency with 50% plans than with 90 %. Tracey Tracey Bruch, CAPP Parking Manager (727) 562 -4771 tracey.bruch @myclearwater.com - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Roamy Valera [mailto:rvalera @timhaahs.com] Sent: Tuesday, July 31, 2007 11:26 AM To: Bruch, Tracey Subject: RE: Ed- Proposed City Garage Cost Per your Request Tracey, The costs listed below are typical for construction of a garage. If the City were building the Garage they would have the same expenses. However, the City needs to be sure that it is charged the going market rate for the cost item and that the Developer does not have any sweet heart deals that they are passing thru to the City. The City should have the right to participate in the engagement of the professional services contractors and construction contracts or at least review and approve the price and terms of engagement. thank you! - ------------------------- - - - - -- Roarny Valera Vice President Timothy Haahs & Associates, Inc. 10305 NW 41St Street Miami, FL 33178 T: 305 592 7123 Ext 14 8/24/2007 From: Tracey.Bruch @myClearwater.com [ mailto :Tracey.Bruch @myClearwater.com] Sent: Tuesday, July 31, 2007 10:23 AM To: Roamy Valera Subject: FW: Ed- Proposed City Garage Cost Per your Request FYI Tracey Bruch, CAPP Parking Manager (727) 562 -4771 tracey.bruch @myclearwater.com - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Akin, Pam Sent: Tuesday, July 31, 2007 10:22 AM To: Irwin, Rod; Bruch, Tracey; Quillen, Michael; Delk, Michael Subject: RE: Ed- Proposed City Garage Cost Per your Request I agree, the point is to move the discussion along not necessarily make commitments Pamela Akin, City Attorney 112 5. Osceola Ave Clearwater, Florida 33758 727 562 -4010 - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Irwin, Rod Sent: Tuesday, July 31, 2007 10:20 AM To: Akin, Pam; Bruch, Tracey; Quillen, Michael; Delk, Michael Subject: RE: Ed- Proposed City Garage Cost Per your Request Importance: High Pam- I, personally, am not in a position to discuss /commit on the laundry list Ed presented in his e- mail. I have asked Tracey to send the list to Haahs for some Y/N initial feedback, which may help. However, some of the items are going to "order of magnitude" rather than Y/N and we don't have any info to evaluate at this point. I think we should narrow the list and try to focus on some items that can be worked through at this juncture. Nobody asked -- just my thought ! Hope it helps. 8/24/2007 Message � . Page 3 of 5 - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Akin, Pam Sent: Tuesday, July 31, 2007 9:56 AM To: Irwin, Rod; Bruch, Tracey; Quillen, Michael; Delk, Michael Subject: FW: Ed- Proposed City Garage Cost Per your Request I will do an agenda for Thursday. This "cost plus" discussion will probably be the primary discussion. Pamela Akin, City Attorney 112 S. Osceola Ave Clearwater, Florida 33758 727 562 -4010 - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Ed Armstrong [mailto:EdA @jpfirm.com] Sent: Tuesday, July 31, 2007 9:08 AM To: Akin, Pam Subject: FW: Ed- Proposed City Garage Cost Per your Request parr - here are some of our thoughts about what the components of "cost" should be for our thursday meeting. ed - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Hunraf @aol.com [mailto:Hunraf @aol.com] Sent: Monday, July 30, 2007 3:04 PM To: Ed Armstrong Cc: luke.luccainc@comcast.net Subject: Ed- Proposed City Garage Cost Per your Request Proposed City Garage Cost Items Architectural Fees (includes all subconsultants i.e. mechanical, electrical, plumbing). Civil Engineering Fees Surveying Costs General Contractors Construction (both horizontal and vertical) Cost plus Contractors Fee and General Conditions. Any and all Equipment required by the city to run the garage. Construction Bonding (if required) 8/24/2007 { M- -ssage • 0 Page 4 of 5 Change orders made by the city after construction begins. Garage Consultant Fees (outside consultant the city required us to have). Owners Representative Program Management Fee. Landscaping including irrigation. Builders Risk Insurance and General Liability Insurance Property Insurance once the garage is completed. Blue prints and copies Soil testing, environmental studies and geotechnical work Construction Interest Construction Loan Fees (points) and lender costs on both the Construction and Permanent Loans Closing Costs on both the Construction and Permanent Plans Review Fees Permit Fees Public Art Impact Fee City utility connection fees Any required city improvements to the garage office that are outside the contract for construction. Any and all other impact fees including (but not limited to) sewer, water and transportation. Legal Fees (includes condo docs, development agreement and any and all other legal fees that may be required). Demo of existing curbs and replacement of same per city requirements. Demolition of existing structures including asbestos abatement and disposal. Real Estate Taxes During Construction. 8/24/2007 Message 0 • Page 5 of 5 Get a sneak peek of the all -new AOL.com. 8/24/2007 Page I of 2 Wells, Wayne From: Delk, Michael Sent: Monday, August 06, 2007 10:47 AM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: FW: Lucca Meeting FYI. For our discussion. Michael L. Delk, AICP Planning Director City of Clearwater, Florida myclearwater.com - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Irwin, Rod Sent: Friday, August 03, 2007 11:59 AM To: Akin, Pam Cc: Horne, William; Bruch, Tracey; Delk, Michael Subject: Lucca Meeting Pam- Bill asked that I share with you my thoughts coming out of the Lucca meeting yesterday. Here they are: 1) Turnkey proposal I am attaching a copy of a preliminary response from Haahs on the cost checklist provided by Lucca. As you can see, we need to see specifics for each category in order to determine the appropriate level of cost assignment. The categories are only part of the answer. It is not unreasonable that they have project budget figures at this point; otherwise, how do they themselves determine feasibility ? ( What is the basis for their statement yesterday that hard construction costs are $21,000 /space ?) Those bullets need to be quantified to #'s /% off a base construction cost per space to allow us to estimate total cost.. It seems they are unwilling to spend the money to generate these #'s. Alternately, you might speak to them about presenting the Term Sheet to Council to get feedback on there receptivity to "up to 30, 000 /space , based upon actual construction cost and apportioned land value." This might give them the comfort level to proceed to generate the 30% design drawings Haahs needs to establish cost. The foundation reinforcement, of course, would be additional(if included). If they were not willing to commit to the term sheet provisions, with an evidence of Council receptivity, then we know that we have a different issue to address and proceed accordingly. 2) Property Acquisition I think it is worth you considering a conversation with the councilmembers, perhaps during your one -on- one's, to explore whether, over the long run, we might be better served to pay an additional property acquisition cost and construct the facility ourselves. We might even realize some development cost savings over a turnkey development(permit costs, overhead for construction, etc.)that could reduce the margin. I have asked Tracey to discuss with Haahs and see what they feel. 8/6/2007 I � ,�. Page 2 of 2 In either case, I think we have significantly higher risk during construction with an outside party that, the avoidance of same, could justify part of the incremental cost and raise the probability that we get a product that we are comfortable with as a City facility on the beach. Hope this helps! Let me know if you have a question. Rod Irwin Assistant City Manager for Economic Development City of Clearwater 112 So. Osceola Ave. Clearwater, Florida 33756 727 - 562 - 4058(0) 727 - 562- 4052(F) rod.irwin @myclearwater.com 8/6/2007 Wells, Wayne From: Joe Burdette aburdette5O5 @tampabay.rr.com] Sent: Thursday, August 02, 2007 10:50 AM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: RE: Marbella Minor Revision Wayne Ed Armstrong and I have a meeting with Pam Akin today at 3:30 regarding the development agreement. As that has to go through CDB as well, there is propably no hurry to get the garage on the August CDB agenda, but I want to confirm that with Pam and my client. Will let you know by tomorrow. - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Wayne. Wells @myClearwater.com [ mailto :Wayne.Wells @myClearwater.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 01, 2007'4:56 PM To: jburdette505 @tampabay.rr.com Cc: Sherry .Watkins @myClearwater.com; neil.thompson @MyClearwater.com; michael.delk @MyClearwater.com Subject: Marbella Minor Revision Joe - On July 17,2007, you were sent the revised outstanding comments on the Marbella Minor Revision. While I didn't tell you a date specific to have the revisions back into me, I said time was of the essence. The CDB meeting is on August 21, 2007, and time is running out. I will not take this to the CDB if the Minor Revision is not complete and approved (not prior to the CDB, but prior to us sending out the packages with the Staff Reports to the CDB). The revised Minor Revision plans that still must be submitted must be reviewed by the City prior to the issuance of the Minor Revision Development Order. I must, under no circumstances, send the Staff Report for the Marbella parking garage out to the CDB on August 16, 2007. That does not mean that the Minor Revision can be submitted on that date. An alternative is that we postpone /continue the public hearing on the parking garage to the September 18, 2007, CDB meeting. Could you please let me know of the status of when the revised Minor Revision is to be submitted? Wayne f • Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Thursday, August 02; 2007 10:45 AM To: Delk, Michael Subject: RE: Marbella Minor Revision As we discussed, this is not a City project and cannot be due to the Aqualea /Hyatt Development Agreement. As such, they just need to pay the applicable fees, which will be part of the "cost" of the garage that will be negotiated in the as- yet -to be submitted, proposed Development Agreement. - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Delk, Michael Sent: Thursday, August 02, 2007 10:13 AM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: RE: Marbella Minor Revision The garage is to a very large extent going to be a city project. Is there any precedent for waiving the continuation fee when we share in the need for more time? Michael L. Delk, AICP Planning Director City of Clearwater, Florida myclearwater.com - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Thursday, August 02, 2007 9:56 AM To: Delk, Michael; Watkins, Sherry Subject: FW: Marbella Minor Revision FYI - If they want to delay the parking garage application at the August CDB meeting, they will need to pay the continuance fee. - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Joe Burdette [ mailto :jburdette505 @tampabay.rr.comI Sent: Thursday, August 02, 2007 10:50 AM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: RE: Marbella Minor Revision Wayne Ed Armstrong and I have a meeting with Pam Akin today at 3:30 regarding the development agreement. As that has to go through CDB as well, there is propably no hurry to get the garage on the August CDB agenda, but I want to confirm that with Pam and my client. Will let you know by tomorrow. - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Wayne.Wells @myclearwater.com [ mailto :Wayne.Wells @myClearwater.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 01, 2007 4:56 PM To: jburdette505 @tampabay.rr.com Cc: Sherry .Watkins @myClearwater.com; neil.thompson @Myclearwater.com; michael.delk @MyClearwater.com Subject: Marbella Minor Revision Joe - On July 17,2007, you were sent the revised outstanding comments on the 1 Marbella Minor Revision. While I didn't tell you a date spelliPic to have the revisions back into me, I said time was of the essence. The CDB meeting is on August 21, 2007, and time is running out. I will not take this to the CDB if the Minor Revision is not complete and approved (not prior to the CDB, but prior to us sending out the packages with the Staff Reports to the CDB). The revised Minor Revision plans that still must be submitted must be reviewed by the City prior to the issuance of the Minor Revision Development Order. I must, under no circumstances, send the Staff Report for the Marbella parking garage out to the CDB on August 16, 2007. That does not mean that the Minor Revision can be submitted on that date. An alternative is that we postpone /continue the public hearing on the parking garage to the September 18, 2007, CDB meeting. Could you please let me know of the status of when the revised Minor Revision is to be submitted? Wayne Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Thursday, August 02, 2007 8:12 AM To: Kambourolias, Sam Cc: Herman, Jason Subject: Map Request - FLD2007- 06020, 325 S. Gulfview Blvd. Sam - I am attaching four maps you previously did back in May 2005 for Cases FLD2005-03020/TDR2005-03021/PLT2005- 00010 (1 have copied them for this new application and have changed /updated the case number and other information at the bottom). I understand that 1 will lose the information on the Existing Surrounding Uses Map (I will redo later). Could you update the north arrow on all of these maps to be more readable and could you update the aerial map if there is a more recent aerial view? If possible, could you update these maps by August 10, 2007?. Thanks. Wayne WWI WL91 Gulfview S 325 Gulfview S 325 Gulfview S 325 Gulfview S 325 Aerial Map.doc_xisting Surrou.ocation Map.doZoning Map.doc • 0 Page 1 of 1 Wells, Wayne From: Bruch, Tracey Sent: Tuesday, July 31, 2007 2:54 PM To: 'Joseph Cimino' Cc: Wells, Wayne; Roamy Valera (Tim Haahs) (E -mail) Subject: RE: Marbella Parking Garage FLD2007 -06020 Joe: The plan is 24/7 with the Pay -on -Foot system and limited staffing for security purposes, special events, etc. Tracey Tracey Bruch, CAPP Parking Manager (727) 562 -4771 tracey.bruch @myclearwater.com - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Joseph Cimino [ mailto :jcimino @wraconsultants.com] Sent: Tuesday, July 31, 2007 9:23 AM To: Bruch, Tracey Subject: Marbella Parking Garage FLD2007 -06020 Tracey, Our company has been coordinating with Wayne Wells on the proposed parking garage located on the north side of 5th between Hamden and Coronado. Three hundred (300) of the spaces will be public and maintained by the City. We are currently addressing Wayne's final comments, in which he asked us to address the operating hours of the Parking garage. He indicated that you would have input on this. Please let me know what needs to be done to address his comment. I have pasted it below: C. Response to Criteria 6 - What are the intended hours of operation of the garage (may need to- get from Tracey Bruch). Thanks so much for your help on this, Joe Cimino Project Engineer Water Resource Associates, Inc. 4260 West Linebaugh Ave. Tampa, FL 33624 Phone: 813- 265 -3130 Fax: 813- 265 -6610 www.wraconsultants.com 7/31/2007 Message • � Page 1 of 4 Wells, Wayne From: Delk, Michael Sent: Tuesday, July 31, 2007 1:20 PM To: Wells, Wayne Cc: Clayton, Gina Subject: FW: Ed- Proposed City Garage Cost Per your Request Wayne - Keeping you in the loop on this one. cold Michael L. Delk, AICP Planning Director City of Clearwater, Florida myclearwater.com - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Akin, Pam Sent: Tuesday, July 31, 2007 10:22 AM To: Irwin, Rod; Bruch, Tracey; Quillen, Michael; Delk, Michael Subject: RE: Ed- Proposed City Garage Cost Per your Request I agree, the point is to move the discussion along not necessarily make commitments Pamela Akin, City Attorney 112 5. Osceola Ave Clearwater, Florida 33758 727 562 -4010 - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Irwin, Rod Sent: Tuesday, July 31, 2007 10:20 AM To: Akin, Pam; Bruch, Tracey; Quillen, Michael; Delk, Michael Subject: RE: Ed- Proposed City Garage Cost Per your Request Importance: High Pam- I, personally, am not in a position to discuss /commit on the laundry list Ed presented in his e- mail. I have asked Tracey to send the list to Haahs for some Y/N initial feedback, which may help. However, some of the items are going to "order of magnitude" rather than Y/N and we don't have any info to evaluate at this point. 7/31/2007 V Message • • Page 2 of 4 I think we should narrow the list and try to focus on some items that can be worked through at this juncture. Nobody asked -- just my thought ! Hope it helps . - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Akin, Pam Sent: Tuesday, July 31, 2007 9:56 AM To: Irwin, Rod; Bruch, Tracey; Quillen, Michael; Delk, Michael Subject: FW: Ed- Proposed City Garage Cost Per your Request I will do an agenda for Thursday. This "cost plus" discussion will probably be the primary discussion. Pamela Akin, City Attorney 112 5. Osceola Ave Clearwater, Florida 33758 727 562 -4010 - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Ed Armstrong [mailto:EdA @jpfirm.com] Sent: Tuesday, July 31, 2007 9:08 AM To: Akin, Pam Subject: FW: Ed- Proposed City Garage Cost Per your Request pam- - here are some of our thoughts about what the components of "cost" should be for our thursday meeting. ed - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Hunraf @aol.com [mailto:Hunraf @aol.com] Sent: Monday, July 30, 2007 3:04 PM To: Ed Armstrong Cc: luke.luccainc @comcast.net Subject: Ed- Proposed City Garage Cost Per your Request Proposed City Garage Cost Items Architectural Fees (includes all subconsultants i.e. mechanical, electrical, plumbing). Civil Engineering Fees Surveying Costs 7/31/2007 Message � • Page 3 of 4 General Contractors Construction (both horizontal and vertical) Cost plus Contractors Fee and General Conditions. Any and all Equipment required by the city to run the garage. Construction Bonding (if required) Change orders made by the city after construction begins. Garage Consultant Fees (outside consultant the city required us to have). Owners Representative Program Management Fee. Landscaping including irrigation. Builders Risk Insurance and General Liability Insurance Property Insurance once the garage is completed. Blue prints and copies Soil testing, environmental studies and geotechnical work Construction Interest Construction Loan Fees (points) and lender costs on both the Construction and Permanent Loans Closing Costs on both the Construction and Permanent Plans Review Fees Permit Fees Public Art Impact Fee City utility connection fees Any required city improvements to the garage office that are outside the contract for construction. Any and all other impact fees including (but not limited to) sewer, water and transportation. Legal Fees (includes condo docs, development agreement and any and all other legal fees that may be required). Demo of existing curbs and replacement of same per city requirements. 7/31/2007 Mes §age 0 • Page 4 of 4 Demolition of existing structures including asbestos abatement and disposal. Real Estate Taxes During Construction. Get a sneak peek of the all -new AOL.com. 7/31/2007 Wells, Wayne From: Albee, Rick Sent: Thursday, July 19, 2007 3:17 PM To: Elliott, Gayle; DRC Members Subject: RE: Resubmittal for the August 21, 2007 CDB Meeting 325 Gulfview- No Issues 211 Dolphin Point- Condition Met. 706 Missouri Ave- No Issues - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Elliott, Gayle Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2007 10:56 AM To: DRC Members Subject: Resubmittal for the August 21, 2007 CDB Meeting DRC Members, Plans for the following cases have been resubmitted for the August 21, 2007 CDB Meeting: FLD2007 -06020 - 325 Gulfview Blvd - Wayne Wells - Planner FLD2O07 -05016 - 211 Dolphin Point - Robert Tefft - Planner FLD20O7 -06019 - 706 N Missouri Ave - Robert Tefft - Planner I Have placed one copy of the case resubmittal package on the cabinets outside of Room 216 in our office for your review (Please do not take it or any of the other copies as they are needed for the CDB members) Please review your comments /conditions for this cases in Permit Plan and determine if they are met. Whether the conditions are "met' or still "not met," please affirm to me via email. Please have these cases reviewed by Friday, July 20, 2007 by 12:00 PM. Thank you Gayle R Elliott Planning Department Staff Assistant (727) 562 -4582 gayle.elliott@myclearwater.com a Wells, Wayne • From: Rickard, Leonard Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2007 2:46 PM To: Elliott, Gayle; DRC Members Subject: RE: Resubmittal for the August 21, 2007 CDB Meeting Lenny Rickard Assistant Fire Marshal Clearwater Fire & Rescue 610 Franklin St., Clearwater, F133756 727 -562 -4327 Ext. 3078 Fax 727 -562 -4461 - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Elliott, Gayle Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2007 10:56 AM To: DRC Members Subject: Resubmittal for the August 21, 2007 CDB Meeting DRC Members, Plans for the following cases have been resubmitted for the August 21, 2007 CDB Meeting: FLD2007 -06020 - 325 Gulfview Blvd - Wayne Wells - Planner [Rickard, Leonard] Not Met FLD2007 -05016 - 211 Dolphin Point - Robert Tefft - Planner [Rickard, Leonard] Met FLD2007 -06019 - 706 N Missouri Ave - Robert Tefft - Planner [Rickard, Leonard] Met I Have placed one copy of the case resubmittal package on the cabinets outside of Room 216 in our office for your review (Please do not take it or any of the other copies as they are needed for the CDB members) Please review your comments /conditions for this cases in Permit Plan and determine if they are met. Whether the conditions are "met' or still "not met," please affirm to me via email. Please have these cases reviewed by Friday, July 20, 2007 by 12:00 PM. Thank you Gayle R Elliott Planning Department Staff Assistant (727) 562 -4582 gayle.elliott@myclearwater.com 0 0 Wells, Wayne From: Vo, Phuong Sent: Friday, July 20, 2007 5:21 PM To: Elliott, Gayle Cc: DRC Members Subject: RE: Resubmittal for the August 21, 2007 CDB Meeting Stormwater has no holds for these cases before CDB. Applicant did not response to Prior to Building permit comments completely. Some were met and some were not. Thanks, Phuong Vo FLD2007 -06020 - 325 Gulfview Blvd - Wayne Wells - Planner FLD2007 -05016 - 211 Dolphin Point - Robert Tefft - Planner FLD2007 -06019 - 706 N Missouri Ave - Robert Tefft - Planner - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Elliott, Gayle Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2007 10:56 AM To: DRC Members Subject: Resubmittal for the August 21, 2007 CDB Meeting DRC Members, Plans for the following cases have been resubmitted for the August 21, 2007 CDB Meeting: FLD2007 -06020 - 325 Gulfview Blvd - Wayne Wells - Planner FLD2007 -05016 - 211 Dolphin Point - Robert Tefft - Planner FLD2007- 06019 - 706 N Missouri Ave - Robert Tefft - Planner Have placed one copy of the case resubmittal package on the cabinets outside of Room 216 in our office for your review (Please do not take it or any of the other copies as they are needed for the CDB members ) Please review your comments /conditions for this cases in Permit Plan and determine if they are met. Whether the conditions are "met' or still "not met," please affirm to me via email. Please have these cases reviewed by Friday, July 20, 2007 by 12:00 PM. Thank you Gayle R Elliott Planning Department Staff Assistant (727) 562 -4582 gayle.elliott@myclearwater.com CJ Wells, Wayne From: Elliott, Gayle Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2007 10:56 AM To: DRC Members Subject: Resubmittal for the August 21, 2007 CDB Meeting • DRC Members, Plans for the following cases have been resubmitted for the August 21, 2007 CDB Meeting: FLD2007 -06020 - 325 Gulfview Blvd - Wayne Wells - Planner FLD2007 -05016 - 211 Dolphin Point - Robert Tefft - Planner FLD2007 -06019 - 706 N Missouri Ave - Robert Tefft - Planner I Have placed one copy of the case resubmittal package on the cabinets outside of Room 216 in our office for your review (Please do not take it or any of the other copies as they are needed for the CDB members) Please review your comments /conditions for this cases in Permit Plan and determine if they are met. Whether the conditions are "met' or still "not met," please affirm to me via email. Please have these cases reviewed by Friday, July 20, 2007 by 12:00 PM. Thank you Gayle R Elliott Planning Department Staff Assistant (727) 562 -4582 gayle.elliott@myclearwater.com Wells, Wayne From: Delk, Michael Sent: Monday, July 09, 2007 1:37 PM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: FW: Lucca parking ga�e Wayne - FYI. Gina's response. mid - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Clayton, Gina Sent: Monday, July 09, 2007 1:29 PM To: Quillen, Michael; Delk, Michael Subject: RE: Lucca parking garage Parking garages are allowed to be 50' in height, however, through a comp. infill project process they could -ask for more height. - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Quillen, Michael Sent: Monday, July 09, 2007 1:11 PM To: Delk, Michael; Clayton, Gina Subject: Lucca parking garage What is the maximum height allowed for a parking garage in the area where the Lucca parking garage is proposed (east of Coronado)? Michael D. Quillen, P.E. Director of Engineering City of Clearwater mi.chael. qu i llen(c�myclearwater. com 727 - 562 -4743 I-] Wells, Wayne • From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Thursday, July 05, 2007 8:57 AM To: Irwin, Rod Cc: Delk, Michael Subject: FLD2007- 06020, 325 S. Gulfview Blvd. - Marbella Parking Garage Rod - Michael Delk asked me to send to you for your information the Draft DRC comments for the above referenced case, scheduled to be discussed at the DRC meeting today at 1:00 pm in our offices. Wayne draft 7.5.07 dre action agenda... 1.00 pm Case Number: FLD2007 -06020 — 325 S GULFVIEW BLVD Owner(s): Lucca Development Llc 9011 S Natoma Ave Oak Lawn, 11 60453 TELEPHONE: No Phone, FAX: No Fax, E -MAIL: No Email Applicant Lucca Development, Llc 9011 S Natoma Ave Oak Lawn, I160453 TELEPHONE: 708 - 430 -0905, FAX: No Fax, E -MAIL: No Email Representative: Clint Cuffle 4260 W. Linebaugh Ave Tampa, F] TELEPHONE: 813 - 265 -3130, FAX: 813- 265 -6610, E -MAIL: ccuffle @wraconsultants.com Location: 2.37 total acres generally located between S. Gulfview Blvd. and Coronado Dr. west of Brightwater Blvd. (Parcel A), between Coronado Dr. & Hamden Dr. north of 5th St. (Parcel B) and east of Hamden Dr. north of 5th St. (Parcel Q. Atlas Page: UNK Zoning District: T, Tourist Request: Flexible Development approval in the Tourist District to permit the addition of a Parking Garage and Lot to Parcel 'B" (located between Coronado Drive and Hamden Drive, north of 5th Street) (FLD2005- 02021 /TDR2005 -03020 previously approved by the CDB on July 19, 2005, to permit 102 attached dwellings), with reductions to the front (south along 5th Street) setback from 15 feet to one -foot (to screen wall) and to five feet (to pavement), a reduction to the front (east along Hamden Drive) from 15 feet to 13 feet (to building) and an increase to building height from 35 feet to xx feet (to top parking deck), as a. Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2- 803.C, with a reduction to required interior interior landscaping from 10 to xx percent and a reduction to required foundation landscaping from five to xx feet, as a Comprehensive Landscape Program, under the provisions of Section 3- 1202.G. Proposed Use: Parking garages and lots Neighborhood Clearwater Beach Association Association(s): Clearwater, F] 33767 100 Devon Dr TELEPHONE: 443 -2168, FAX: No Fax, E -MAIL: papamurphy @aol.com Neighborhood Clearwater Neighborhoods Coalition Association(s):. Clearwater, Fl 33758 P O Box 8204 TELEPHONE: No Phone, FAX: No Fax, E -MAIL: No Email Presenter:_ Wayne Wells, Planner III Attendees Included: City: Wayne Wells, Neil Thompson, Scott Rice, Steve Doherty, Lenny Rickert, Tracy Bruch Applicant: Ed Armstrong, Jayne Sears, Clint Cuffle, The DRC reviewed this application with the following comments: General Engineering: Development Review Agenda - Thursday, July 5, 2007 - Page 27 • • The following conditions shall be met prior to review by the Community Development Board: 1. Handicapped parking space on east side of garage on first floor plan does not meet minimum aisle width requirement of 24 feet. 2. Sidewalk ramps at street corners shall be constructed per City of Clearwater Contract Specifications and Standards Index #109, pg. 1/3. 3. Show on the plan the required sidewalk along Coronado Drive. (Community Development Code Section 3 -1701) 4. Show on the plan the sidewalk along Hamden Drive extended to the north property line. (Community Development Code Section 3 -1701) The following shall be met prior to issuance of a Building Permit: 1. Show on the plan a sanitary connection to an existing lateral rather than open cutting Hamden drive to connect to a sanitary manhole. 2. Provide on the plan a double sweep sanitary cleanout in the right -of -way per City of Clearwater Contract Specifications and Standards Index #305. 3. Provide a dimension on the plan indicating that the Fire Department Connection will be installed at least 15 feet from the building. 4. Indicate on the plan what material the driveways are to be constructed of If concrete is to be used, include Clearwater Contract Specifications and Standards Index #103, page 2/2. 5. Show all city details applicable to this project. 'The City's Construction Standards and Utility Information can be found on our web site: www.myclearwater .com/gov /depts /pwa/engin /Production /stddet/index.asp . General Note: DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review, additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. Environmental: Fire: No Issues. Provide Fire Flow Calculations / Water Study by a FIRE PROTECTION ENGINEER to assure an adequate water supply is available and to determine if any upgrades are required by the developer due to the impact of this project. Calculations / Water Study due PRIOR TO CDB . 2. To be addressed for building permit, stairways, exiting to include if an open stairway seperation from Parking Garage will be required to include doors. Stairs over 3 stories in height that are open are required to have 48" minimum guardrails with visual protection to prevent vertigo. Harbor Master: 1 . No issues. Legal: 1 . No issues. Land Resources: No Issues. Landscaping: Development Review Agenda - Thursday, July 5, 2007 - Page 28 1 . Sheet 6 - Relocate the information in the box at the top of the drawing regarding interior landscaping to be part of General Note # 19. Recalculate the square footage of interior landscaping. If less than 10 percent of vehicular use area, then must include a reduction request and include in the Comprehensive Landscape Program. 2. Sheet 6 - There is a five -foot wide foundation landscape area required along the south side of the building, landscaped to meet the requirements of Section 3- 1202.E.2. This area will be measured from the curb to the front of the columns. If proposal is less than the required five -foot area, then it needs to be included in the request as part of a Comprehensive Landscape Program. This foundation landscape area cannot be counted as part of the interior landscape area (if required). Remove diagonal striping from this area. 3 . Sheet 9 - Revise the following: a. In lieu of queen palms, utilize sable palms and washingtonia palms; b. Eliminate turf on -site and instead plant a tiered type of landscaping on the east, south and west sides (turf may be used in the retention area). Use viburnam instead of silverthorn (less maintenance), with india hawthome or other shorter plants in front of the vibumam; c. Unclear if it was intended to specify 4 gallon liriope (normally specified as one gallon); d. Utilize the corners of 5th Street and Coronado Drive and 5th Street and Hamden Drive to have a specimen tree (such as Medjool or a salt tolerant shade tree); e. Incorporate other drought and salt tolerant groundcovers in open areas; f Plant crape myrtles in foundation landscape area on south side of garage; g. Use of crape myrtles and tree ligustrum in smaller landscape areas and to break up other planting areas acceptable (these are accent trees by our Code); h. No Fakahathee grass shown on plan or specification provided in the schedule; and i. No turf specified. Parks and Recreation: Stormwater: Open space /recreation impact fees are due prior to issuance of building permits or final plat (if applicable) whichever occurs first. These fees could be substantial and it is recommended that you contact Art Kader at 727 - 562 -4824 to calculate the assessment. The following shall be addressed prior to issuance of building permit. 1. Survey shall include 50' adjacent topo that is north of the the north property line. This also include the adjacent structure's finished floor elevation. 2 Show a detail of the control structure. 3. Survey datum in the bleeddown analysis is not consistent. Column E is based on NGVD datum and others based on NAVD88 datum. This is the same with Hydraulic summary. Please revise drainage report accordingly. 4. Provide a maintenance schedule for the proposed pond. 5. Provide an approved SWFWMD permit. 6. Show pipe's type, size, slope, and invert elevations. General note: 1. DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. 2. At building permit application, applicant shall resubmit all data for review. Solid Waste: 1 . how will solid waste be handled within garage? Traffic Engineering: Development Review Agenda - Thursday, July 5, 2007 - Page 29 0 0 TRAFFIC DIVISION COMMENTS All parking stalls shall have 24' wide drive aisle for backing out of a parking stall. Provide this requirement for van accessible parking stall at the southeast corner of ground floor. 2. Demonstrate by a turning template how a 17' scaled vehicle can park in the first stall closest to the Fifth Street entrance. 3. Regarding note #18 on page 6, revise to provide a minimum 40 -foot stacking length from back of sidewalk(extended) to gate, ticket dispensor or other control device. 4. Acknowledge with a note on the site plan indicating that : the minimum vertical height clearance to accommodate van accessible parking shall be a minimum of 8'2" including entrance,route, stall and exit. The remainder of the garage shall have a minimum vertical clearance of T -0 ". 5. Sheet A1.2; direction of travel is reversed on ramp. Please correct. The above to be addressed prior to a Community Development Board (CDB) hearing. General Note(s): 1) Applicant shall comply with the current Transportation Impact Fee Ordinance and fee schedule and paid prior to a Certificate of Occupancy (C.O.). 2) DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. PARKING DIVISION COMMENTS Sheet A0.1 1. At entry/exit, sufficient space shall be provided for control equipment. Provide a minimum 6'- 4" wide island at the south exit lane to accommodate future booth unless pay -on -foot system will be used. There is no need to extend islands beyond the east building line. 2. Suggest rearrangement of southwest stair /elevator to allow glass- backed elevator to face Coronado Drive. Doors between stairs and lobby and between lobby and garage are not necessary and create security concerns. There is no run of stairs down here as shown on drawings. 3. Note - At southeast stair, there is no run of stairs down here as shown on drawings. 4. Office - Eliminate south door, check door swing(s) for exit purposes. 5. Provide fire exit at northwest corner of building. Sheet Al.1 6. Same comment as in #2 for doors between lobby and stairs /garage. 7. Provide floor plan for 2nd level as there is a blend needed at top of ramp from ground level. 8. On 5th level, eliminate accessible space along west side and gain one regular parking space. Sheet Al. 2 9. On 6th level, eliminate 2 accessible spaces and gain one space along west side. 10. Parking spaces on west side of third column from the northeast comer are shown flat, extending over the sloping ramp below. This area of parking will encroach upon the clear height of the ramp below. Check for proper clear height for ramp. 11. Check exit distance for spaces near northeast comer (dead end spaces) to exit stair. May need stairs here to provide fire exit. 12. Provide door at southeast stair well as weather barrier. Sheet A3.1 13. Correct space count. Entrance level contains 50 spaces; Sheet A0.1 shows 40 spaces on this level. General 14. Provide open stairwells for security and ventilation purposes. 15. No material specified. Assume this will be supplied with next submission. Attention to durability is paramount. Development Review Agenda - Thursday, July 5, 2007 - Page 30 Planning: C L Development Review Agenda - Thursday, July 5, 2007 - Page 31 6/18/07 - WW Email dated 6/14/07 modified this condition to show this as the ADDITION of a Parking Garage and Lot to that already approved and the written material needs to reference the 102 attached dwellings on Parcel A. 6/11/07 - WW As a modification to that approved under FLD2005- 02021, the application written material needs to reflect the 92 -unit condominium building on Parcel A, even though it was previously approved and is not proposed to be revised, including responses to General Applicability and Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria (assumed that it is not being revised from that previously approved by the CDB). 2. Sheet 6 - Revise General Note #7 to the real height for the parking garage. 3 . Sheet 6 - Revise General Note #19 to reflect both Parcel A and Parcel B site data (need to add Parcel A site data based on the Minor Revision plans). 4. Sheet 6 - Remove the Note regarding the Minor Amendment at the bottom of the sheet. 5 . 6/1 8/07 - WW To be submitted later after Minor Revision completed. 6/11/07 - WW As a modification to that approved under FLD2005- 02021, need the following (one original and 14 copies): a. surveys (boundary, topographic and tree) for Parcels A and C; b. site and landscape plans for the 92 -unit condominium building on Parcel A (may be a copy of what was previously approved by the CDB); c. building elevations for the 92 -unit condominium building on Parcel A (may be a copy of what was previously approved by the CDB); d. colored elevation for at least one elevation of the 92 -unit condominium building (may be the same as what was previously approved by the CDB); e. floor plans for the 92 -unit condominium building on Parcel A (may be a copy of what was previously approved by the CDB); f. property deeds for Parcels A and C; g. tree inventory for Parcels A and C (as appropriate); and h. stormwater analysis for Parcel A. 6. Sheet 6 - a. Revise on the drawing the proposed setback on the north side to the building to the front of the column; .b. Revise General Note #6 for the proposed north side setback (see above comment); and c. Revise Parcel B south setback to also indicate the setback to pavement. 7. Elevation Sheets A2.1 - A2.4 - Provide the height of the building from BFE to the top parking deck level. Additionally, provide the height of the stair /elevator towers from top parking deck level to top of pitched roof (not midpoint of pitched roof) (maximum height of stair /elevator towers is 16 feet from top parking deck level to top of pitched roof). 8 . Sheet 6 - General Note #19 - Unclear of what the Proposed "3.24" FAR refers to, as a parking garage is not FAR. 9. Sheet 6 - General Note #19 - Revise Required "Parking Spaces" based on the Minor Revision. 10. Sheet 6 - There is an inconsistency regarding the lot area for Parcel B between General Note #5 and General Note #19 (Existing and Proposed). Revise to the correct lot area. 11 . Sheet 6 - Revise the Note in the upper right corner for the project name from Marrabella to Marbella. 12. Sheets 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, A0.1, ALL, A1.2, A2.1, A2.2, A2.3, A2.4, A3.1, A3.2, and colored A2.1, A2.2, A2.3 and A2.4 - Revise the name for the project name in the title blocks from "Marrabella" or "Clearwater Beach" to "Marbella ". 13. Sheet 4 - Revise title block from "Demolition Plan" to Existing Conditions" (see Sheet I Index). 14. Sheet 6 - Revise General Note #13 from VE to AE flood zone and the elevation to reflect both 12 and 11 (see survey). 15. Sheets A2.1 - A2.4 - Western stair /elevator tower area above the "windows" is taller than the eastern tower and appears out of scale with the eastern tower. Provide justification or reduce height of western tower. 16. Sheet 6 - Demonstrate by a turning template shown on the drawing of how a vehicle can park in the easternmost outside space and that vehicles can make the left turn movement to exit the outside parking area. Development Review Agenda - Thursday, July 5, 2007 - Page 32 9 0 17 . Sheets 6, 7, 8, 9 and A0.1 - Sheet A0.1 indicates a 30 -inch tall screen wall along the south side of the property. This wall needs to be indicated on Sheets 6, 7, 8 and 9. The location of the wall should rather be placed adjacent to the parking spaces with the landscaping on the outside so the public can enjoy the landscaping, not the vehicles. Suggest rethinking location of the walls toward the intersections of 5th Street with Coronado and Hamden Drives, moving the wall to be closer to the driveways. 18. Sheet 6 - Provide the width of sidewalks, both within the rights -of -way and on -site. 19. Sheet 6 - Provide a dimension from 5th Street to the edge of the parking lot and provide a dimension of the exit driveway, width. 20. Sheets 6, 7, 8, 9 and A0.1 - From a pedestrian flow standpoint, the desired flow is to have pedestrians cross Coronado Drive at 5th Street. To that end, a sidewalk should come straight out from the entry doors and the excess concrete sidewalk north of the entry doors should be removed. A sidewalk adjacent to the building five to six feet in width south of the entry doors should be provided to the sidewalk south of the stairs. A landscaped area between the sidewalk coming straight out from the entry doors and the sidewalk on the south side of the stairs can be maintained.. The goal is to "funnel" pedestrian traffic to the intersection. 21 . Sheets 6, 7, 8, 9 and A0.1 - Plans indicate through stippling, and by proposed elevations (BC) on Sheet 7, raised concrete areas in various areas of the parking garage. Unclear why these raised concrete areas are designed, rather than keeping these areas level with the parking deck and utilizing paint striping if necessary. This is also assumed to occur on upper levels of the garage also ( ?). 22. Condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: That a Declaration of Unity of Title (for condominiums) be recorded prior to the issuance of any permits tying Parcels A, B and C together. 23 . Sheet A0.1 - Based on 382 total spaces, only eight handicap spaces required. 24. Sheet 6 - Based on this sheet showing 12 -inch E.I.F.S. on east and west sides of the southeast portion of the garage, revise proposed setbacks on west side to 14 feet (provide dimension at this location and change General Note #6). 25 . Sheet 6, 7, 8, 9 and A0.1 - Unclear how handicap space in southeast comer has an accessible path that doesn't go behind other vehicles and due to raised curb. Revise /advise. 26. Sheet 7 and A0.1 - Unclear how drainage pond extends under ramp if north wall goes to the ground (see A2.3). 27. It has been my understanding that the parking on the ground floor accessed from 5th Street will be private parking and gated, but no gates are shown. Show gate locations. 28. Sheet 6 - Provide length of parking spaces on west side (should be 18 feet from face of center column per Sheets A0.1, A1.1 and A1.2). 29. Sheet A0.1 - Since an office area with restroom is being provided on the ground floor (below BFE), this room must be floodproofed. Remove notes indicating flood vents. 30. Sheet A1.2 - Since there are 50 private spaces on the ground level and the City is only purchasing 300 parking spaces, this means there are 32 parking spaces on the 6th level that will be private. It is unclear how these 32 spaces will be gated off to prevent the general public from parking within them. There are no gates indicated, which will reduce parking provided due to required 24 -foot backup area for 90- degree parking. Additionally, there should be a turnaround area for the public should all public spaces be full (lose one parking space for the turnaround). This turnaround area must be marked and signed for such outside of the gate. Revise this sheet io show the gates and turnaround. Revise parking counts on Sheets 6 and A0.1. 31 . Sheet A2.2 - Revise spelling of Coronado below the elevation. 32. Sheet A2.4 - Revise Hamden Street to Hamden Drive under the elevation. 33 . Sheet A3.1 - This drawing indicates floor to floor dimensions, but does not take into account the double tees depth when indicating actual height clearance for vehicles, especially for ADA. Revise to provide additional dimensions that would account for the depth of the double tees to reflect the actual clearances. 34. Sheet A3.1 - Provide a dimension that adequate clearance is provided between the fifth level ramp and the bottom edge of the structure for parking on the west side of the sixth level. 35 . Sheet A3.2 - Revise the spelling of "Coronado" and change Street to Drive and revise Hamden Street to Hamden Drive. Development Review Agenda - Thursday, July 5, 2007 - Page 33 0 0 36 . Sheet A3.2 - These line of sight drawings indicate a full wall and indicates "painted aluminum mullions screening ". However, there is only a single, center column, which is not clearly drawn and would not have any opening. The drawings should show the structural floor with the solid railing and it open otherwise. The "painted aluminum mullions screening" only occur at certain locations and aren't any deeper than the solid railing. Suggest removing the "painted aluminum mullions screening" verbiage. . 37. Sheet A3.2 - Unclear why a 100 -foot distance was used for both drawings. Right -of -way width for Coronado Drive is 60 feet. Adding a 15 -foot setback for the garage only provides a 75 -foot dimension from the other side of Coronado Drive. For Hamden Drive, also with a 60 -foot right -of -way, even adding the 13 -foot setback, the 100 -foot sight distance would place the pedestrian in the water. Suggest redrawing using a more realistic sight line dimension that the public would actually see. 38. Elevations (black and white AND colored) - Need a legend with what the color names are. Also, provide color samples /chips for the proposed exterior colors (one copy). 39. Revise Page I of the application for the following: a. Project Name: Marbella Parking Garage - Parcel B; b. Parcel Size (acres and square feet) to reflect Parcels A, B and Q. c. Parcel Numbers: Parcel A : 07/29/15/52380/000 /0630 and 07/29/15/52380/000 /1110; Parcels B and C: 08/29/15/ 17586/ 001 / 0120,08/29/15/ 17586/ 001 /0130,08/29/15/17586 /001/0140, 08/29/15/17604/000 /0080 and 08/29/15/17604/000 /0100; d. Add to the Agent Name the city, state and zip code for Water Resource Associates, Inc.; and e. Street Addresses: Parcel A: 325 S. Gulfview Blvd. and 326 Coronado Dr.; Parcel B: 345, 347 and 3.53 Coronado Dr. and 346 and 350 Hamden Dr. 40. Attachments to application - Revise project name to Marbella. 41 . Revise Attachment A - A. General Project Description - 1. Paragraph 1 - Revise the number of dwellings on Parcel A from 91 units to 92 units; 2. Paragraph 2 - A Minor Revision to the original approved project relocated the 10 units on Parcel B to Parcel A. This proposal is not the replacement of the 10 units on Parcel B, but the ADDITION of a Parking Garage and Lot to the approved project of 102 dwelling units on Parcel A; 3. Paragraph 2 - Revise the height of the parking garage; B. Building Height Increase - Revise to actual height; C. Setback Reductions - 1. Front (5th Street) - Add the setback to pavement; 2. Add Front (Coronado Dr) - Add 14 feet to building. 42. Revise Attachment B - A. Response to Criteria 1 - 1. Paragraph 2 - Revise the proposed garage height (see prior comments regarding the height from BFE and the height of the towers); 2. Provide the scale/height of this project in relation to other projects (provide specific heights of the surrounding projects); 3. Paragraph 3 - Revise 4th Street to Brightwater Drive; B. Response to Criteria 2 - 1. Revise Gulf Boulevard to S. Gulfview Boulevard; C. Response to Criteria 6 - What are the intended hours of operation of the garage (may need to get from Tracey Bruch). 43 . Revise Attachment C - A. Response to Criteria 1 - Need to include a response to an increase to building height; B. Response to Criteria 3 - Need to discuss surrounding approved and/or constructed redevelopment projects as to how this proposal will not impede redevelopment of the area; C. Response to Criteria 6 - Third paragraph - Revise 4th Street to Brightwater Drive. 44. Revise Attachment G for the name of the project to Marbella Parking Garage. 45. Revise Attachment I for the name of the project to Marbella Parking Garage. 46. Revise Attachment J for the name of the project to Marbella Parking Garage. 47. Update Attachment K and L with the revised plans. Other: No Comments Notes: Development Review Agenda - Thursday, July 5, 2007 - Page 34 - Page 1 of 2 Wells, Wayne From: Delk, Michael Sent: Friday, June 15, 2007 1:57 PM To: Wells, Wayne Cc: Clayton, Gina Subject: FW: Lucca Development Coronado Garage Construction Estimates. FYI. mld - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Hunraf @aol.com [mailto:Hunraf @aol.com] Sent: Friday, June 15, 2007 11:51 AM To: pam.aiken @myclearwater.com Cc: bcala @gmadesign.com; bhornjak @themurraycompany.com; ed @jpfirm.com; Ehooperl @aol.com; Kelly.luccainc @comcast.net; galbers @themurraycompany.com; keith @keithzayac.com; luke.luccainc @comcast.net, gbrumbac @hotmail.com; Delk, Michael; Quillen, Michael; Irwin, Rod; Bruch, Tracey; Horne, William Subject: Lucca Development Coronado Garage Construction Estimates. VETO This is the best we can do with the information we have today. Everything we have you have, as it was submitted with the DRC application. We really cannot go any further until after we receive approvals as there are always more comments from DRC. The following represents our best estimate for the construction of the Coronado Garage. As we have no final construction drawings (and will not begin those until after we have DRC and CDB approval and a signed Development Agreement with the city) nor do we have an actual start date, our subcontractors will not guarantee any of the below listed pricing past 30 days due to the volatility of material costs especially during hurricane season. Therefore the costs listed below may change, and that change could be substantial one way or the other. The costs do include the necessary equipment required by the city to run the garage (i.e.: walk -up pay stations, an office, a ADA bathroom, center islands and ticket dispersing, etc). LUCCA DEVELOPMENT, INC CLEARWATER BEACH GARAGE ESTIMATE BREAKDOWN DESCRIPTION COST SITEWORK $494,208 CONCRETE WORK (INCL. FOUNDATIONS) $5,106,632 MASONRY $155,840 METALS $192,101 ROOFING & CAULKING $148,784 DOORS, FRAMES & HARDWARE $21,893 GLASS & GLAZING $93,846 FRAMING & DRYWALL $28,209 ACOUSTIC CEILING $19,198 6/15/2007 FLOORING / CERAMIC $31,784 PAINTING & WALL COVERING $59,102 SPECIALTIES $26,075 EQUIPMENT $292,371 CONVEYING SYSTEMS $338,994 PLUMBING $51,692 FIRE SPRINKLERS $334,442 HVAC $21,414 ELECTRIC $299,815 TOTAL ESTIMATE $7,716,400 PARKING STALLS (SITE AND STRUCTURED) COST PER PARKING STALL TOTAL STRUCTURE AREA (SF) COST PER GROSS SF NOT INCLUDED ABOVE: LANDSCAPING DESIGN COSTS DEVELOPMENT COST (i.e.: construction interest carry) DEVELOPER PROFIT CURB REMOVAL AND REPLACEMENT DRC COSTS (i.e.: surveys, application fees) PERMIT & IMPACT FEE INSURANCE (i.e.: builders risk, general liability, etc.) See what's free at AOL.com. 6/15/2007 382 $20200 137,564 $56.09 Page 2 of 2 Page 1 of 2 Wells, Wayne From: Delk, Michael Sent: Monday, June 11, 2007 10:23 AM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: FW: Joe Burdette - Re: Proposed Beach Garage? Wayne - FYI. - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Hunraf @aol.com [mailto:Hunraf @aol.com] Sent: Monday, June 11, 2007 7:31 AM To: Irwin, Rod Cc: bcala @gmadesign.com; bhornjak @themurraycompany.com; ed @jpfirm.com; galbers @themurraycompany.com; luke.luccainc @comcast.net; gbrumbac @hotmail.com; Delk, Michael Subject: Re: Joe Burdette - Re: Proposed Beach Garage? The construction cost estimates have not changed since out meeting 2 weeks ago.... hard cost is $20,000 per spot (due to having to meet Beach by Design architectural requirements, city of Clearwater parking dept. requirements i.e.: office, bathrooms, walk -up pay stations and equipment, a/c for the office, etc. etc.. In addition the following cost must be included as they are actual cost: 1. Interest carry during construction 2. Costs of tearing up new curb and putting in a different curb (planning dept. requirement) 3. Landscaping to meet Beach by Design criteria 4. But most of all: The requirement of your parking department for wide spans in the garage substantially increases costs due for wider beams, thicker slabs, larger pile caps... etc 5. And finally, the developer is entitled to sum amount of "pre -tax" profit. Until this project is ready to be built and a "start date" given, there is no way to get hard bids from subcontractors, so the above are our construction estimates added to the $5,000 per space according to your appraiser which is ridiculous, but that is another story for another day. You have the same drawings that we have (in planning), you can always get your own estimates. Right now the price is $30,000 per spot until Luke says otherwise. If you would prefer, I will meet individually with all the council members and explain this. I have already met with two of them and it won't take me long to meet with two more. Let me know if that is what you want me to do. 6/11/2007 • • Page 1 of 1 Wells, Wayne From: Fausel,Rick [rfausel @themurraycompany.com] Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2007 9:12 AM To: Delk, Michael Cc: Wells, Wayne Subject: Clearwater Beach Parking Garage - Lucca Development 3 of 3 Thanks, Rick J. Fausel Project Manager GMA Design Group Inc. 15500 Lightwave Drive, Suite 106 Clearwater, FL 33760 ph: 727 - 538 -2601 fax: 727- 538 -2701 8/1/2007 . • Page 1 of 1 Wells, Wayne From: Fausel,Rick [rfausel @themurraycompany.com] Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2007 9:11 AM To: Delk, Michael Cc: Wells, Wayne Subject: Clearwater Beach Parking Garage - Lucca Development 1 of 3 Gentlemen, Attached are PDF files of the revisions in response to the comments at the meeting on May 2, 2007, aluminum mullions have been added to the first and second floor as well as a raising the spandrel to 42" which acts as a screen wall (see attached section for line of sights). If you have any questions please don't hesitate to call. Thanks, Rick J. Fausel Project Manager GMA Design Group Inc. 15500 Lightwave Drive, Suite 106 Clearwater, FL 33760 ph: 727 - 538 -2601 fax: 727 - 538 -2701 8/1/2007 • • Page 1 of 1 Wells, Wayne From: Fausel,Rick [rfausel @themurraycompany.com] Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2007 9:11 AM To: Delk, Michael Cc: Wells, Wayne Subject: Clearwater Beach Parking Garage - Lucca Development 2 of 3 Thanks, Rick J. Fausel Project Manager GMA Design Group Inc. 15500 Lightwave Drive, Suite 106 Clearwater, FL 33760 ph: 727 - 538 -2601 fax: 727-538-2701 8/1/2007 PLANNING DEPARTMENT ITY OF C LEARIATER POST OFFICE BOX 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758 -4748 MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562 -4865 May 21, 2007 Mr. Joe Burdette 618 Pineland Ave. Belleair, FL 33756 Re: Lucca Development, LLC Dear Mr. Burdette: I am in receipt of your request concerning the City's position related to proposed changes to the Pinellas Planning Council (PPC) Countywide Plan Rules for density for overnight accommodation uses. Please be advised that the City Administration, with the support of the City Council, has indicated throughout this process our support for the increases in density proposed by the PPC. While every City will ultimately make it's own decision whether or not to adopt the revised density regulations, it is our intention to act quickly to propose these changes for adoption by the City of Clearwater. Of course, that process will include public hearings by the Community Development Board (CDB) for a recommendation and, ultimately, a decision by the City Council. Regarding the Marbella project specifically, it has been our desire to protect and encourage overnight accommodation uses. on Clearwater Beach. I anticipate that we would work diligently with the project representatives for the Marbella project in the event they wished to take advantage of any such increases in density to redevelop the property for overnight accommodation uses. Any such proposals would be considered in the context of a Level II approval and require a public hearing before the CDB. Please let me know if you have any additional questions about this matter. We welcome your consideration of the potential future redevelopment of the Lucca Development, LLC property for overnight accommodation uses. Sincerely, Michalel Delk, AICP I/ Planning Director S.•IPlanning DepartmentlLetterslZoning LetterslGu�Oiew S 325 Lucca Development, LLC (T) 5.21.07.doc FRANK HIBBARD, MAYOR JOHN DORAN, COUNCILMEMBER J.B. JOHNSON, COUNCILMEMBER BILL JONSON, COUNCILMEMBER CARLEN A. PETERSEN, COUNCILMEMBER "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER" • • Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Monday, May 21, 2007 10:37 AM To: Joe Burdette (E -mail) Subject: Lucca Development, LLC Joe - Attached is the letter from Michael Delk regarding the PPC proposal. Wayne Gulfview 5 325 Lucca Developme... • • Page 1 of 3 Wells, Wayne From: Clayton, Gina Sent: Thursday, May 17, 2007 10:20 AM To: Wells, Wayne Cc: Delk, Michael Subject: FW: Joe Burdette - Re: Marbella Project Wayne - could you draft a short letter to Joe Burdette based on my comments below? I'll be happy to discuss in more detail if needed. I would guess they would like to get such a letter by the end of next week. Let me know if this is a problem. Thanks! - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Clayton, Gina Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2007 12:11 PM To: Delk, Michael Subject: RE: Joe Burdette - Re: Marbella Project I think it is silly to draft a letter based on the PPC proposal because it is an evolving proposal - we can't even be assured of what is going to be voted on at this point since the BCC wants more information on Dave' unwritten option #4. Furthermore, we don't know if Burdett's client can design a building and parking garage that complies with the proposed 4.0 FAR. I wouldn't want to make those kind of commitments. I would be in favor of writing a letter that states we are supportive of increasing the hotel density on the beach to be more economic parity between condos and hotel. - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Delk, Michael Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2007 1:32 PM To: Clayton, Gina Subject: FW: Joe Burdette - Re: Marbella Project Esteemed GentleADperson - What do you think of this request? - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Hunraf @aol.com [mailto:Hunraf @aol.com] Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2007 11:21 AM To: Delk, Michael Subject: Joe Burdette - Re: Marbella Project Michael I am trying to hold together the Marbella Project on the Beach together for my client, (this does not affect the current city garage proposal) and possibly, 5/21/2007 • • Page 2 of 3 depending on what the county does with density, change it to a hotel project. You gave them a letter on January 31, 2007 regarding the city's support for increased density for hotel units. What they are asking for now, needs to be a little more project specific. First: Here is some background: The owners have approximately 3.68 contiguous acres. If they drop the Marbella Condo plan and if the county plan goes through with the density increase for hotel units and the city adopts it, they could possibly get 125 units per acre or 460 units. That still includes the proposed city garage on Parcel B as that would not count against them for density purposes. There could be one hotel on the beach site where the current condos are proposed (known as Parcel A), and one hotel on the Coronado site on the opposite side of 5th street from the garage. The Garage is known as Parcel B and the .property on the opposite side of 5th street we will call Parcel C. There are 47 hotel density units left on Parcel C (Wayne Wells has confirmed that). They could file an application for that right now for a hotel, and could expand it later when and if the additional density got approved. All of that being said, what they would like to have from you is a letter specific to this 3.6& acres saying that the city supports the plan the county is now considering and, if the developers drop the currently approved Marbella Condominium plan and the county density is increased as currently proposed and the city adopts it, that the city staff would support having 460 hotel units constructed on this site (125 units per acre x 3.68 acres = 460 units) even if there is a city garage on parcel B. All of the above would, of course, be subject to going through the DRC /CDB process for approval and conforming to the requirements of Beach by Design. What we are running into on the beach is that there are numerous hotel developers who want to build on Clearwater Beach if the density is increased. So what has to be done now is to convince the developers lenders to sit back and wait and see what happens with the density before they go into a panic. Anyway, call be if you have any questions (458- 4528). They just need this letter to be as strong as you are comfortable in making it and for it to be specific to this site. Let me know what you think. Thanks Joe 5/21/2007 0 • Page 3 of 3 See what's free at AOL.com. 5/21/2007 PP—PP—P-- Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2007 3:07 PM To: Barrett, Earl Subject: RE: Marbella Earl - When you say preliminary site plan for the project, do you mean for the parking garage on Parcel B or for the attached dwelling high rise on Parcel A? If for the attached dwelling high rise on Parcel A, I have plans. If you mean the parking garage on Parcel B, see Tracey Bruch (I haven't seen the plans). Wayne - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Barrett, Earl Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2007 2:26 PM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: Marbella Wayne - You provided me with boundary surveys of Lucca Development parcels A, B & C that are proposed for development as Marbella Condominium. Has Lucca submitted any preliminary site plan drawings for the project yet? An appraiser is being hired to value the B parcel and would like to review any project plans that may be available. 0 0 AGENDA Lucca Parking Garage Project Meeting Tuesday, April 19,2007 2:00 P. M. CMO Conference Room I. Status of Design and Layout Negotiations II. Discussion of Land Valuation and Apportionment III. Condominium Issues IV. Parameters /Components of Management Agreement V. Development Agreement and Purchase Contract VI. Project Approval Process and Schedule VII. Next Steps Page 1 of 1 I' � • Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2007 2:23 PM To: Irwin, Rod Subject: RE: Draft Agenda Yes, I will attend. - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Irwin, Rod Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2007 2:14 PM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: RE: Draft Agenda If possible, just as a resource on the history /status of the transactions involved with the subject site and questions about the approval process moving forward. Are you available? - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2007 2:10 PM To: Irwin, Rod Subject: RE: Draft Agenda Rod - Is this a meeting I am expected to attend? Wayne - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Irwin, Rod Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2007 2:09 PM To: 'hunraf @aol.com'; 'ed @jpfirm.com'; 'luke.luccaine @comcast.net'; Akin, Pam; Quillen, Michael; Bruch, Tracey; Wells, Wayne; Delk, Michael Subject: FW: Draft Agenda Importance: High Here is agenda for meeting tomorrow Rod Irwin Assistant City Manager _ for Economic Development City of Clearwater 112 So. Osceola Ave. Clearwater, Florida 33756 727 - 562 - 4058(0) 727 - 562- 4052(F) rod.irwin @myclearwater.com 8/1/2007 S T1 0 AGENDA Lucca Parking Garage Project Meeting Tuesday, April 19,2007 2:00 P. M. CMO Conference Room I. Status of Design and Layout Negotiations II. Discussion of Land Valuation and Apportionment III. Condominium Issues IV. Parameters /Components of Management Agreement V. Development Agreement and Purchase Contract VI. Project Approval Process and Schedule VII. Next Steps • Wells, Wayne From: Barrett, Earl Sent: Thursday, April 12, 2007 4:28 PM To: Akin, Pam; Irwin, Rod Cc: Delk, Michael; Wells, Wayne; Bruch, Tracey Subject: RE: Marbella garage property Thanks. Will proceed in that manner with appraisers.- - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Akin, Pam Sent: Thursday, April 12, 2007 4:00 PM To: Barrett, Earl; Irwin, Rod Cc: Delk, Michael; Wells, Wayne; Bruch, Tracey Subject: RE: Marbella garage property • I am not sure that the property beneath the garage will be release from the unity of title. The problem with releasing these lots is that they are a source of density for the project.. But I think that for our purpose we probably need to appraise it as if it were. Pamela Akin, City Attorney 112 S. Osceola Ave Clearwater, Florida 33758 727 562 -4010 - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Barrett, Earl Sent: Thursday, April 12, 20073:40 PM To: Akin, Pam; Irwin, Rod Cc: Delk, Michael; Wells, Wayne; Bruch, Tracey Subject: RE: Marbella garage property Pam - Thanks for thorough explanation of the status of discussions. I spoke with Tracey after my email. Tracey gives me the impression that room for 20 open, ground level parking spaces will be carved out of the lands to be appraised (6 lots), and will be part of the Marbella common elements. The balance of the six lots will be released from the unity of title binding the lands to the Marbella project. That is what will be appraised and on which the City and Lucca will negotiate the parking garage development and operational specifics. If that is accurate I believe I can request appraisers to provide quotes to value these lands only for that purpose. Will proceed with solicitation if agreeable. - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Akin, Pam Sent: Thursday, April 12, 2007 3:31 PM To: Barrett, Earl; Irwin, Rod Cc: Delk, Michael; Wells, Wayne; Bruch, Tracey Subject: RE: Marbella garage property Earl, I have some thoughts: we do not at present know how the deal with the developer will be structured and think that there are a couple of options. What they have proposed at the moment is that we purchase 300 of the approximately 400 spaces to be constructed. They have proposed a turnkey deal with purchase price of 30,000 per space, we have proposed 30,000 as a not to exceed number based on cost of construction and a proportionate share of the land value. By ordinance we will have to obtain two appraisals and cannot pay more than fair market value. So I think that we can either take their approach and get an appraisal of the fair market value of the 300 spaces in the parking garage or we can take the approach you have outlined below which is valuing the land which has no development rights and can be used only for a parking garage or open space use and paying a proportionate share in addition to the cost of construction.. At the moment, the developer's primary concern is whether or not we can reach an economic deal which explains why we have to have an understanding now of the appraised value of the garage and or the und• ing land before we have a fully fleshed out agreement. Pamela Akin, City Attorney 112 S. Osceola Ave Clearwater, Florida 33758 727 562 -4010 - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Barrett, Earl Sent: Thursday, April 12, 2007 11:19 AM To: Irwin, Rod Cc: Delk, Michael; Akin, Pam; Wells, Wayne; Bruch, Tracey Subject: Marbella garage property 1•. In order to solicit real estate appraisers to value the correct interests the City seeks to acquire in the portion of the parking garage parcel for the proposed Marbella condominium I would appreciate a consensus on exactly how to present the appraisal assignment. After speaking with all addressees except Pam, my present understanding of the appraisal job is as follows: Building density of 18 overnight accommodations were transferred to the Lucca Development Marbella project from property addressed at 401 Coronado and 406 Hamden owned by Fifth South, LLC. All of the Lucca owned property between Gulfview and Coronado, along with the proposed garage site between Coronado and.Hamden are to unified in title to accommodate the total density of 102 dwelling units that are to be converted from 137 overnight accommodations that would be permitted with the above TDR. All of the dwelling unit density for the project will be constructed on the main parcel between South Gulfview and Coronado, and Lucca will construct a 400 unit parking garage under Marbella condominium ownership on the "garage parcel'. Thirteen of the parking spaces will be assigned to and owned by the residential unit owners. The City will purchase 300 of the parking spaces, and Lucca will have the remaining 87 spaces, more or less, to market for other uses. Based on the above scenario, the City would ask the appraiser to value the land beneath the garage for the purpose of establishing payment the City would make to Lucca in addition to the still undermined purchase price it will make for the 300 parking spaces that would be available for use by the general public. I would appreciate any comments and clarification prior to contacting appraisers. • Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Thursday, April 12, 2007 8:30 AM To: Barrett, Earl Subject: RE: Marbella project - City parking garage Yes, come see me (it is in my office). - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Barrett, Earl Sent: Thursday, April 12, 2007 8:26 AM To: Wells, Wayne Cc: Delk, Michael Subject: RE: Marbella project - City parking garage • Thanks Wayne. Do you have a site plan I can review to obtain legal description of the lands to appraised? - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2007 4:44 PM To: Barrett, Earl Cc: Delk, Michael Subject: Marbella project - City parking garage Earl - Michael asked me to send these to you, as you will be getting an appraisal for the Parcel B site for the City parking garage. If you have any questions regarding the attachments, I will get you an answer. Wayne << File: Facts and Issues for Lucca Development, LLC Property - 3.21.O7.doc >> << File: Marbella Project Unit Confirmation - 3.15.O7.doc >> • Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2007 4:44 PM To: Barrett, Earl Cc: Delk, Michael Subject: Marbella project - City parking garage Earl - • Michael asked me to send these to you, as you will be getting an appraisal for the Parcel B site for the City parking garage. If you have any questions regarding the attachments, I will get you an answer. Wayne W Facts and Issues Marbella Project for Lucca Dev... Unit Confirma... • 0 Page 1 of 1 Wells, Wayne From: Delk, Michael Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2007 1:25 PM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: FW: Joe Burdette - Proposed City Garage FYI. - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Hunraf @aol.com [mailto:Hunraf @aol.com] Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2007 1:18 PM To: Bruch, Tracey Cc: Quillen, Michael; Irwin, Rod; Delk, Michael; luke.luccainc @comcast.net; galbers @themurraycompany.com Subject: Joe Burdette - Proposed City Garage Tracey Murray Construction has their parking consultant on board and a lot of work has been done that needs to be reviewed and discussed at our next meeting which I was hoping would be this week. We can go no further until we have this meeting and be sure we have designed a garage that the city will be happy with. We still need to do the elevations, but cannot do that until the inner workings of the garage are agreed on. If we meet this week, we have a chance of being able to make the May 4 DRC application date. If we delay much past this week we will not be able to do so and we will be delayed by at least one month. Rod Irwin said he was trying to set up a meeting for this week but I have not heard from him and, as I said, we are ready and just waiting. Please let me know when we can meet and hopefully it is this week as Rod has told me that time is of the essence. Joe Burdette See what's free at AOL.com. 8/1/2007 • . • Wells, Wayne From: Akin, Pam Sent: Monday, April 02, 2007 10:44 AM To: Delk, Michael Cc: Irwin, Rod; Dougall- Sides, Leslie; Wells, Wayne Subject: RE: Lucca Development Property Yes, I agree and We need to make sure that no building permits are issued for rehabbing these units Pamela Akin, City Attorney 112 5. Osceola Ave Clearwater, Florida 33758 727 562 -4010 - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Delk, Michael Sent: Tuesday, March 27, 2007 4:21 PM To: Akin, Pam Cc: Irwin, Rod; Dougall- Sides, Leslie; Wells, Wayne Subject: RE: Lucca Development Property We are not now taking any steps to revoke. I can discuss this matter with Development Services and preclude any further collection /issuance of Business License taxes for these addresses. Concurrently, we can communicate this to the property owner. We can ascertain for the property owner what development potential remains in the coming week or two. We can advise the property owner of the need to revoke the existing business license and initiate the necessary proceedings. Do you agree and /or shall we proceed accordingly? mld Michael Delk, AICP Planning Director City of Clearwater, FL 727 - 562 -4561 myclearwater.com - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Akin, Pam Sent: Tuesday, March 27, 2007 4:06 PM To: Wells, Wayne; Delk, Michael Cc: Irvin, Rod; Dougall- Sides, Leslie Subject: RE: Lucca Development Property Based on this information, are we taking the appropriate steps to revoke the OCL for 406 Hamden? I reccomend that we notify the property owner of his very limited remaining development protenitla on those sites. How do we make sure no further OCLs are issued and thet only appropriate applicatioons for new development are accepted? Pamela Akin, City Attorney 112 5. Osceola Ave Clearwater, Florida 33758 727 562 -4010 r - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Tuesday, March 27, 2007 3:37 PM To: Delk, Michael; Akin, Pam Cc: Irwin, Rod; Dougall- Sides, Leslie Subject: RE: Lucca Development Property Pam - Both 401 Coronado Drive and 406 Hamden Drive are the sending sites for the 18 TDRs used for Marbella, with the 18 TDRs based on the maximum density of 40 overnight accommodation units per acre in effect at the time of CDB approval (six units /rooms for 401 Coronado Drive and 12 units /rooms for 406 Hamden Drive). The site at 401 Coronado Drive is not currently operating. There is a pending occupational license (OCL) application for an eight -unit motel.(since the prior uses were a restaurant and retail sales, such would constitute a change in use and would need to be approved, most likely by the CDB, if possible). The site at 406 Hamden Drive previously had an OCL for a 15 -unit motel (business closed on 5/18/05). An OCL for an 18 -unit motel was issued 2/9/07. Since density was transferred off of both 401 Coronado Drive and 406 Hamden Drive, it would appear there is no density left to operate anything on those properties today. I would note that under the new density regulations allowing 50 overnight accommodation units per acre, 401 Coronado Drive calculates to seven units /rooms and 406 Hamden Drive calculates to 15 units /rooms, for a total of 22 units /rooms. Those four new units /rooms could be used in another hotel project either on -site or used as part of a new off -site TDR application (sending site). Wayne - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Delk, Michael Sent: Tuesday, March 27, 2007 2:39 PM To: Akin, Pam Cc: Irwin, Rod; Wells, Wayne Subject: RE: Lucca Development Property Pam - The answer appears to be yes. Wayne will review the file again to see if he can figure out how the planner in charge of the case handled it. He'll provide a summation. mld - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Akin, Pam Sent: Tuesday, March 27, 2007 1:54 PM To: Delk, Michael Cc: Irwin, Rod Subject: RE: Lucca Development Property Michael, I have a question on Wayne's memo. 401 Coronado and 406 Hamden are the contributing sites for the 18 TDRs used for Marbella. Both of those sites are now operating as overnight accommodations. Are they currently using density that they have transferred? Pamela Akin, City Attorney 112 S. Osceola Ave Clearwater, Florida 33758 727 562 -4010 - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Irwin, Rod Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2007 10:23 AM ., To: *Akin, Pam is Subject: FW: Lucca Development Property FYI in advance of our discussions on the Lucca Garage proposal. - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Delk, Michael Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2007 9:04 AM To: Irwin, Rod Cc: Wells, Wayne; Brumback, Garry Subject: FW: Lucca Development Property Rod - I didn't review this till this morning which is why it didn't get over yesterday. Sorry. Let me know if any questions. As we stated earlier, we will proceed with the new use only of public parking garage back to the CDB and separate that from the condo /conversion part. Please note other issues portion. If Marbella changed to all overnight at some point, based on proposed PPC rules, they could have 460 hotel rooms. michael Michael Delk, AICP Planning Director City of Clearwater, FL 727 - 562 -4561 myclearwater.com - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2007 9:00 AM To: Delk, Michael Subject: Lucca Development Property Michael - Attached is the information you have requested. Wayne << File: Facts and Issues for Lucca Development, LLC Property - 3.21.07.doc >> << File: Marbella Project Unit Confirmation - 3.15.07.doc >> . a � • . Page 1 of 3 Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Thursday, March 29, 2007 4:49 PM To: Delk, Michael Subject: RE: Joe Burdette Re: Proposed City Garage Michael - A Development Agreement (DVA) must be approved by the CDB prior to going to City Council. Usually the FLD case and the DVA case are on the same CDB agenda. Wayne - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Delk, Michael Sent: Thursday, March 29, 2007 4:38 PM To: Wells, Wayne Cc: Thompson, Neil; Clayton, Gina Subject: FW: Joe Burdette - Re: Proposed City Garage fyI. - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Irwin, Rod Sent: Thursday, March 29, 2007 4:16 PM To: 'Hunraf @aol.com'; Bruch, Tracey Cc: Delk, Michael; Brumback, Garry;.galbers @themurraycompany.com; Horne, William; Akin, Pam; ed @jpfirm.com; luke.luccainc @comcast.net; Harriger, Sandy; Bertels, Paul; Quillen, Michael Subject: RE: Joe Burdette - Re: Proposed City Garage Joe - I think it is a good idea. We need to make sure we are in agreement on the deal points before we move much further, subject only to your meeting on the basic layout next week being successful. Your proposed agenda is a good start. By copy of this reply I am asking City staff to review the agenda and suggest any additional items we should discuss. I will have Sandy start to identify some dates on Monday when City staff are available and get back to you ASAP. o 8/l/2007 - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Hunraf @aol.com [mailto:Hunraf @aol.com] Sent: Thursday, March 29, 2007 2:32 PM To: Irwin, Rod; Bruch, Tracey Cc: Delk, Michael; Brumback, Garry; galbers @themurraycompany.com; Horne, William; Akin, W 0 Page 2 of 3 Pam; ed @jpfirm.com; luke.luccainc @comcast.net Subject: Re: Joe Burdette - Re: Proposed City Garage Rod That sounds fine with me. We can agenda most of all of that for next week as well. As to Michael Delk we will not have an elevation ready for him to see from a planning department perspective until we know you are okay with the interior of the garage including things like parking spaces, parking ramps, traffic flow, parking fee collection areas, etc. We will then deal with the elevation that meets the criteria under Beach by Design. Typically we would not get a sign off from Michael on that until after the DRC process is completed which, on the schedule we are proposing would not be until June. If we wait for DRC and CDB approval before starting the development agreement process we will substantially delay the construction schedule we are proposing. Further, in fairness to Lucca Development, all of this should go forward as simultaneously as possible so that if if looks like Lucca and the city are not going to be able to reach an equitable business agreement he can stop spending money preparing for the DRC. Its is kind of a catch 22. If we wait until we have a Development Agreement to start the DRC process we will be even more substantially delayed. The same pretty much goes for engineering. Until we know you are okay with the garage layout that has been drawn (which will dictate the footprint of the building), we will not know how to deal with engineering issues such as stormwater runoff, retention areas, utility connections, curb cuts, etc. With all this in mind, I think we would be well served to set a meeting for next week and agenda the following: A. Garage layout including traffic circulation, ramps, parking spaces, parking fee collection systems and locations. B. Preliminary terms of a management agreement. C. Preliminary discussions of land evaluation and apportionment. D. Condominium issues. Depending on his availability, once you let me know the time and place of the meeting I will suggest that we have Lucca's attorney Ed Armstrong attend this meeting as well. Let me know your thoughts Joe 8/1/2007 u . . 4 • • Page 3 of 3 See what's free at AOL.com. 8/1/2007 n . • Page 1 of 2 Wells, Wayne From: Delk, Michael Sent: Thursday, March 29, 2007 2:10 PM To: Wells, Wayne Cc: Thompson, Neil; Clayton, Gina Subject: FW: Joe Burdette - Re: Proposed City Garage FYI. - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Irwin, Rod Sent: Thursday, March 29, 2007 2:03 PM To: 'Hunraf @aol.com'; Bruch, Tracey Cc: Delk, Michael; Brumback, Garry; galbers @themurraycompany.com; Horne, William; Akin, Pam Subject: RE: Joe Burdette - Re: Proposed City Garage Joe- Great to hear that things are progressing! However, we all need to review /sign off on the design, then reach agreement on the multiple terms of a management agreement for the garage. Finally, we have to come to agreement on a land valuation and apportionment. All this will need to be fully defined before and in a development agreement .Those substantive issues will be resolved at my level - -- before we get into legal drafting. There are also condominium issues to resolve. I would suggest that after Tracey ,Paul and Mike Quillen and Michael Delk see the revised design, and if they are o.k. at that point, we schedule a principals meeting, with Luke in attendance , with a defined agenda based upon my comments above. That way neither your client or the City spend money prematurely until we have agreement on all the deal points. - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Hunraf @aol.com [mailto:Hunraf @aol.com] Sent: Thursday, March 29, 2007 12:55 PM To: Bruch, Tracey Cc: Irwin, Rod; Delk, Michael; Brumback, Garry; galbers @themurraycompany.com Subject: Joe Burdette - Re: Proposed City Garage Tracy We are ready with the garage drawings as well as a lot more information we have been able to compile and would like to set a meeting with you next Wednesday or Thursday while Luke Castrogiovanni is in town) to review them with you one more time (Thursday would be better for me). If you are then satisfied, we would begin immediately to try and complete an application to the DRC by the May 4, 2007 deadline. We would also simultaneously begin the negotiations of a Development Agreement with Pam Akin. If we file on May 4, we will be on the July 17, CDB agenda for the garage itself and could be scheduled for the City Council to approve the Development Agreement in August (As I recall the Council usually only has one meeting in July). 8/1/2007 Page 2 of 2 Should we be able to stay on this track,-we could begin construction in late September or early October. Please let me know as soon as possible when the meeting can be.scheduled. Thanks Joe Burdette See what's free at AOL.com. 8/1/2007 9 0 Wells, Wayne From: Delk, Michael Sent: Wednesday, March 28, 2007 4:52 PM To: Pullin, Sharon Cc: Wells, Wayne; Irwin, Rod Subject: Meeting with Pam and Rod Sharon - Please get with Sandy Harriger on Monday (she is out this week) and see about setting up a meeting with Pam, Rod, Wayne and me to sit down and go over the site plan for Marbella relative to Wayne's recent email summaries of development approvals and current entitlements. Thanks! Michael Delk, AICP Planning Director City of Clearwater, FL 727 - 562 -4561 myclearwater.com LUCCA DEVELOPMENT, LLC PROPERTY FACTS AND ISSUES March 21, 2007 MARBELLA PROJECT - 325 S. Gulfview Boulevard (including 326, 345, 347 and 353 Coronado Drive and 346 and 350 Hamden Drive) Under Case Nos. FLD2005- 02021 /TDR2005- 03020/PLT2005- 00010, the project was classified into three "Parcels" (Parcels A, B and Q. Parcel A included those properties between Coronado Drive and South Gulfview Boulevard (326 Coronado Drive and 325 S. Gulfview Blvd.). Parcel B included those properties between Coronado Drive and Hamden Drive (345 Coronado Drive, 347 — 353 Coronado Drive, 346 Hamden Drive and 350 Hamden Drive). Parcel C includes the small waterfront lots east of Hamden Drive associated with Parcel B lots and contain docks for the upland motels. The total project area under the Marbella project is 2.37 acres. ■ The application approved by the CDB under Case Nos. FLD2005- 02021 /TDR2005- 03020/PLT2005 -00010 included a Termination of Status of Nonconformity (Termination) for density. There exists on Parcels A and B the equivalent of 119 overnight accommodation units, where only 93 overnight accommodation units are permitted at the then current maximum density of 40 units /rooms per acre. The application approved by the CDB under Case Nos. FLD2005- 02021 /TDR2005- 03020/PLT2005 -00010 included the Transfer of Development Rights (TDR) of 18 overnight accommodation units from 401 Coronado Drive and 406 Hamden Drive. These 18 overnight accommodation units, based on 40 overnight accommodation units /rooms per acre, also represented the maximum number of units (18) that could be transferred to the receiving site under the provisions of Section 4 -1402 (20% of 93 units = 18 units). ■ The overall Marbella project included the 119 overnight accommodation units approved under the Termination regulations and the 18 overnight accommodation units approved under the TDR for a total of 137 overnight accommodation units. The Marbella project utilized the conversion of 137 overnight accommodation units to 102 dwelling units using the 40/30 conversion rule (multiply 137 overnight accommodation units by 0.75 = 102 dwelling units). The Marbella project approved by the CDB consisted of 92 units on Parcel A and 10 units on Parcel B. The Marbella project is still a valid Flexible Development (FLD) project, as a Time Extension was approved requiring the submission of a building permit to January 19, 2008. A request for a maximum of one -year time extension may still be requested by the applicant, but must be approved by the CDB prior to the expiration date of January 19, 2008. • The applicant has submitted a Minor Revision request for the Marbella project to relocate the 10 units on Parcel B to Parcel A, so that all 102 units will be on Parcel A. The Minor Revision is under staff review at this time. • Based on Minor Revision plans submitted for the Marbella project (under review), all 102 dwelling units are located on Parcel A, but with only 189 parking spaces meeting Code requirements. The Marbella project approved by the CDB included a total of 239 parking spaces, at a ratio of 2.34 spaces per unit. At the current Code minimum requirement of two parking spaces per unit, a total of 204 spaces are required to be provided. With only 189 spaces that meet Code requirements provided on Parcel A, there are at least 15 spaces required on Parcel B for the Marbella project. • The approval of the Marbella project stands on its own at this time, having used the density, Termination and conversion rules in effect at the time of approval. The Termination rules have now been amended by City Council disallowing the conversion to a different use. • While the City regulations have been changed to permit 50 overnight accommodation units per acre in the Tourist District, the Marbella project cannot avail itself of this increase in allowable density, due to City Council amending the Termination rules to disallow the conversion to a different use. • Likewise, the developer cannot avail himself to the proposed Countywide rules allowing 125 overnight accommodation units per acre (minimum of three acres required), because the City Council amended the Termination rules to disallow the conversion to a different use, UNLESS the developer desires to abandon the current Marbella project in lieu of developing overnight accommodation units over the entire property (Marbella property and the Other Lucca Development, LLC Property listed below). OTHER LUCCA DEVELOPMENT, LLC_PROPERTY 401 Coronado Drive This site is a sending site for the TDR portion of the Marbella project. This site was previously developed with a restaurant and retail sales. An OCL request in 2004/2005 for a five -unit motel was denied by Planning, as it represented a change in use requiring either an FLS or FLD approval. An OCL request for an eight -unit motel is currently pending. 406 Hamden Drive - This site is a sending site for the TDR portion of the Marbella project. An OCL has been issued for an 18 -unit motel. Based on visual inspection, staff can only verify 15 units. The status of this issued OCL needs to be reviewed (may need to be revoked). ' 405 Coronado Drive — Presently developed with the Key Lime Inn. An occupational license (OCL) is pending at this time for eight units, but based on visual inspection, staff can only verify seven units. 415 Coronado Drive — Presently developed with the Falcon Motel., An OCL is pending at this time for 22 units (verified based on visual inspection). 419 Coronado Drive — Presently developed with the Gulf Beach Motel. A prior OCL listed this motel as 17 units. An OCL has been issued for a 20 -unit motel. Based on visual inspection, staff R 1 4 • • can only verify 16 units. The status of this issued OCL needs to be reviewed (may need to be revoked). OTHER ISSUES The applicant has provided information that the property Lucca Development,LLC owns beyond the Marbella project is 1.31 acres in size. This involves the property at 401 Coronado Drive, 405 Coronado Drive, 415 Coronado Drive, 419 Coronado Drive and 406 Hamden Drive. Based on 50 overnight accommodation units per acre, these 1.31 acres could be redeveloped with 65 overnight accommodation units, HOWEVER, this number must be reduced by the 18 units transferred from 401 Coronado Drive and 406 Hamden Drive to the Marbella project, leaving a maximum of 47 units to be developed on the 1.31 acres. The TDR sending site (401 Coronado Drive and 406 Hamden Drive) can derive the benefit of the increased density of 50 overnight accommodation units toward the redevelopment of the 1.31 acre property owned by Lucca Development, LLC south of 5ffi Street. Should the applicant abandon the approved Marbella project in lieu of developing overnight accommodation units over the entire property ( Marbella property and the Other Lucca Development, LLC Property listed above), the entire property owned by Lucca Development, LLC totals 3.68 acres. At 125 overnight accommodation units per acre under the proposed Countywide rules, a total of 460 overnight accommodation units could be developed on the overall Lucca Development, LLC property. MARBELLA PROJECT UNIT CONFIRMATION March 15, 2007 FLD2005 -02 021 /TDR2005- 03020/PLT2005 -00010 325 S. Gulfview Boulevard (including 326, 345, 347 and 353 Coronado Drive and 346 and 350 Hamden Drive) PARCEL A 1. 325 South Gulfview Boulevard Clearwater Beachview Resort (formerly Howard Johnson Express Inn) 64 -room motel 2. 326 Coronado Drive Americana Gulf Resort 5 -unit motel PARCEL B 3. 345 Coronado Drive Lucca Development 3 dwelling units 4. 347 — 353 Coronado Drive + 350 Hamden Drive Tropicana 32 -unit motel 5. ' 346 Hamden Drive Albatross 12 -unit motel (there are 12 numbered rooms + room 14 + office) (now asking for a 16 -unit motel — see Pending OCL) SENDING SITES UNDER TDR2005 -03020 6. 406 Hamden Drive Bay Lawn Motel 15 -unit motel (there are eight numbered units downstairs, including the office unit, and seven numbered units upstairs) (see OCL — Issued for an 18 -unit motel ? ? ?) 7. 401 Coronado Drive Back Street Used to be a restaurant and retail (see OCLs) (based on field investigation, there could be maybe the possibility of seven units, AFTER REMODELING. Some walls have been closed to re- create rooms. Restaurant used maybe 5 — 6 rooms. New stucco and paint on exterior) 5 -unit motel denied in 2004/2005 — need approval through FLS or FLD for change of use. (now asking for an 8 -unit motel — see Pending OCL) Wells, Wayne From: Sent: To: Subject: Facts and Marbella ies for Lucca Deect Unit Confirn Wells, Wayne Tuesday, March 27, 2007 2:54 PM Dougall- Sides, Leslie RE: Lucca Development Property - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Dougall- Sides, Leslie Sent: Tuesday, March 27, 2007 2:52 PM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: FW: Lucca Development Property Could you e -mail me your Facts and Issues memo? Thanks! Leslie K. Dougall -Sides Assistant City Attorney City of Clearwater P.O. Box 4748 Clearwater, Florida 33758 (727) 562 -4010 phone (727) 562 -4021 fax Board Certified in City, County and Local Government Law Admitted in Florida, Oregon, and the District of Columbia Senior Professional in Human Resources - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Akin, Pam Sent: Tuesday, March 27, 2007 2:49 PM To: Dougall- Sides, Leslie Subject: FW: Lucca Development Property Pamela Akin, City Attorney 112 5. Osceola Ave Clearwater, Florida 33758 727 562 -4010 - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Delk, Michael Sent: Tuesday, March 27, 2007 2:39 PM To: Akin, Pam Cc: Irwin, Rod; Wells, Wayne Subject: RE: Lucca Development Property Pam - The answer appears to be yes. Wayne will review the file again to see if he can figure out how the planner 'in charge of the case handled it. He'll provide a summation. MY 0 0 - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Akin, Pam Sent: Tuesday, March 27, 2007 1:54 PM To: Delk, Michael Cc: Irwin, Rod Subject: RE: Lucca Development Property Michael, I have a question on Wayne's memo. 401 Coronado and 406 Hamden are the contributing sites for the 18 TDRs used for Marbella. Both of those sites are now operating as overnight accommodations. Are they currently using density that they have transferred? Pamela Akin, City Attorney 112 5. Osceola Ave Clearwater, Florida 33758 727 562 -4010 - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Irwin, Rod Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2007 10:23 AM To: Akin, Pam Subject: FW: Lucca Development Property FYI in advance of our discussions on the Lucca Garage proposal. - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Delk, Michael Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2007 9:04 AM To: Irwin, Rod Cc: Wells, Wayne; Brumback, Garry Subject: FW: Lucca Development Property Rod - I didn't review this till this morning which is why it didn't get over yesterday. Sorry. Let me know if any questions. As we stated earlier, we will proceed with the new use only of public parking garage back to the CDB and separate that from the condo /conversion part. Please note other issues portion. If Marbella changed to all overnight at some point, based on proposed PPC rules, they could have 460 hotel rooms. michael Michael Delk, AICP Planning Director City of Clearwater, FL 727 - 562 -4561 myclearwater.com - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2007 9:00 AM To: Delk, Michael Subject: Lucca Development Property Michael - Attached is the information you have requested. Wayne << File: Facts and Issues for Lucca Development, LLC Property - 3.21.07.doc >> << File: Marbella Project Unit Confirmation - 3.15.07.doc >> 7 Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Wednesday, February 21, 2007 3:09 PM To: Delk, Michael Subject: RE: Lucca Project Michael - fl Based on what I know of this project and its location, the property is zoned Tourist District. The property is within the Small Motel District under Beach by Design. While the Small Motel District gives guidance regarding height for Brightwater Drive, it is not explicit relative to height limitations for the other areas between Hamden and Coronado Drives. To use as guidance other projects that have been approved and what we have generally told other developers, a building height of 60 -70 feet could be considered. Under the Tourist District, I am classifying this use as "parking garages and lots ", the following would be required: • minimum lot area = 20,000 square feet; • minimum lot width = 100 feet; • height (see above discussion) = at a maximum height of 50 feet it could be processed as a Flexible Standard Development (FLS) application (assuming all other standards and criteria as a FLS are met); over 50 feet must be processed as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project Flexible Development (FLD) application; • Front setback = 15 - 25 feet; side setback = 10 feet; rear setback = 10 - 20 feet; all street frontages require a front setback; • Flexibility criteria: 1. The parcel proposed for development is not contiguous to land designated as residential in the Zoning Atlas; 2. Access to and from the parking garage or lot shall be based on the findings of a transportation analysis approved by the city; 3. The stacking spaces available for cars waiting to pass through a parking ticket dispensable or booth to enter the garage or lot shall be based on the design and size of the garage or lot; 4. Any frontage along a public street is landscaped or designed to be similar in character and use to other uses fronting on each street for a distance of 250 feet in either direction along the street or the nearest intersections, whichever is less; 5. Parking structures are designed, constructed and finished so that the structure of the garage is architecturally compatible the design and character of adjacent principal uses; 6. There is an unmet existing demand for additional parking in the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development; 7. Construction of a parking structure would not otherwise be physically feasible; 8. The front and rear setbacks which are provided are improved as an arcade or with other active pedestrian /commercial areas for sidewalk cafes, sidewalk vendors, street furniture or urban amenities; 9. The design of all buildings complies with the Tourist District design guidelines in Division 5 of Article 3. 10. Front setback: a. The reduction in front setback contributes to a more active dynamic street life; b. The reduction in front setback results in an improved site plan or improved design and appearance. 11. Rear setback: a. The reduction in rear setback does not prevent access to the rear of any building by emergency vehicles; b. The reduction in rear setback results in an improved site plan, more efficient parking or improved design and appearance; c. The reduction in rear setback results in landscaping in excess of the minimum required. • Compliance with all other Community Development Code requirements. Wayne - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Delk, Michael Sent: Wednesday, February 21, 2007 1:34 PM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: FW: Lucca Project Wayne - Can you give me a very brief answer to these? michael - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Bruch, Tracey Sent: Thursday, February 15, 2007 4:04 PM To: Delk, Michael Subject: Lucca Project Michael: Our consultant has asked a couple of questions about the proposed parking garage. Can you please help me.... • Lot size • height restrictions & set -backs in this area of the beach • any other zoning requirements? Thanks Tracey Tracey Bruch, CAPP Parking Manager (727) 562 -4771 tracey.bruch @myclearwater.com 2 d .z • Wells, Wayne From: Delk, Michael Sent: Wednesday, February 07, 2007 8:39 AM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: FW: Joe Burdette - Coronado Garage (aka Marbella Garage) FYI. This will be coming forward soon I suspect. in - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Tim [mailto:tim @groundfl.com] Sent: Wednesday, February 07, 2007 8:02 AM To: 'Jim Brown'; Bruch, Tracey; jburdette505 @tampabay.rr.com Cc: 'Tim'; Irwin, Rod; Quillen, Michael; Delk, Michael Subject: RE: Joe Burdette - Coronado Garage (aka Marbella Garage) • Page 1 of 3 Gentlemen and Lady, please see initial responses to the comments from Tracey Bruch with the City of Clearwater Beach, I did speak with Tracey at length yesterday for some clarifications. Please advise if any of you have additional input at this time or other concerns not addressed below, please keep in mind this is very preliminary and we understand there is an entire review process to be completed yet. We just wanted to get some initial feedback. Coronado Garage (aka Marbella Garage) - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Tracey.Bruch @myClearwater.com [ mailto :Tracey.Bruch @myClearwater.com] Sent: Tuesday, February 06, 2007 11:17 AM To: jim @groundfl.com; jburdette505 @tampabay.rr.com Cc: rod.irwin @MyClearwater.com; Michael .Quillen @myClearwater.com; michael.delk @MyClearwater.com Subject: RE: Joe Burdette - Coronado Garage (aka Marbella Garage) 1. What is the total sq. ft. per space (efficiency)? Currently 452.4 sf. gross we are going to landscape at the corners and modify the layout slightly to increase our efficiency. 2. What are the dimensions of the footprint of the structure? 188' -10" x 153' -4" 3, Vertical clearance by level? overall height of structure? Currently All 9'4" clearance we may reduce upper levels to reduce overall height. Current overall height to top of roof is 72' 4. Column placement options? (Relocate / eliminate from rear end of stalls) . We are going to look at pushing the columns in as far as structurally possible. This is PT. 8/1/2007 ., r • • Page 2 of 3 concrete so we are somewhat limited in span. 5. Right turns to exit very difficult - will result in damage to columns, equipment, etc. We will look to push back columns at the entrance and exits to minimize this issue. 6. Two -way flow presents conflict points @ ingress / egress (i.e., stalls adjacent to entry / exit interfere with queuing of vehicles entering / exiting) . Review possible one -way restrictions. Will look at changing to one way counter clockwise movement throughout. 7. Where are mechanical / electrical, etc. rooms located? Will locate each floor near elevators ends of stairs 8. Need approx. 20 x 20 for staff office space (include H/C accessible restrooms for staff only). Will include on first level. W/ Unisex restroom. 9. Attendant station on island at exit must be ADA compliant. Will comply 10. What is intent of access gates (card access only - not public parking) on Hamden? Consider eliminating and adding a 3rd (reversible) lane at entrance on 5th? Tracey and I discussed this and thought it might be a good approach to consider 3 lanes one reversible from Hamden. Reconfigure ramp so that it aligns with the entrance. Then second entrance/ possibly exit only onto 5th. Public /Private, the thought was the entrance on Hamden could be arranged (North to South) key card lane, (those folks that park here everyday) attendant lane and ticket dispenser for daily public parking, exit lane attendant and receipt reader from pre -paid kiosk in parking structure the 5th street Entrance /Exit could be exit only with receipt reader from kiosk in parking structure 11. Need more specific dimensions on ingress / egress areas. Will provide more dimensioning 12. Is there any queuing on 5th or Hamden to enter the facility? what is the distance of the entry lane(s)? Currently Hamden is 45' Queuing and 5th is 50' queuing from Gate to edge of curb 13. Need more specific dimensions of 2 -way bays at base of ramps. All Drive lanes are 24' and ramp is 24' if we convert to one way we will likely leave 24'. 14. Show pedestrian access points. 8/1/2007 Page 3 of 3 Will show, will consist of gates and doors /gates into /out of open stairwells,. 15. Detail on transition of public to private. Thought is Spaces will be marked as reserved, also 5 levels will be City's 300 spots, we can have additional gates on interior to separate public /private. 16. No parking areas in the corners could be eliminated and notched out - gaining additional green space on the ground level and improving overall efficiency of the structure. Will eliminate and plant landscaping. Any additional comments please don't hesitate to send them. We will revise drawings and submit plans incorporating information above. Thank you. Timothy S. Aebie Vice President Ground Floor Engineering Tim @groundfl.com www.groundfl.com 800 - 738 -0525 8/1/2007 f r 0 Proposed Term Sheet Dated: November 20,2006 For the Purchase of up to 300 parking spaces by the City of Clearwater in a Facility to be Constructed by Lucca Development, LLC, on Clearwater Beach, Florida Site: The Parking Structure is to be constructed on a .93 acre site located on 5h Street, between Hamden and Coronado, on Clearwater Beach. Purchaser And Seller: The Purchaser, the City of Clearwater, agrees to purchase up to 300 parking spaces in a 396+ space parking structure to be constructed by the Seller. The Seller will be Lucca Development, LLC, or a designated assignee agreeable to the City. Purchase Price The purchase price shall be an amount not to exceed $30,000 per space, for a number of spaces not to exceed 300, based upon agreed actual construction cost and apportioned land acquisition cost. Conditions: Seller and Purchaser agree that the purchase shall be subject to approval and execution of a Development Agreement and Purchase Contract by the parties, as well as agreement on the design, functionality, management, operation and condominium ownership of the Parking Structure. Seller agrees that development of the site will be in conformance with, and pursuant to, plans which will be submitted to and approved by the Clear water Community Development Board, as well as the City Council of Clearwater, as Purchaser, for construction of a 396+ parking space facility. The spaces in the facility, above those purchased by the City, shall be utilized solely to meet the development requirements of the adjacent project(s) of the Seller, Lucca Development, LLC., and/or for additional public parking. r� y Term Sheet for the sale or lease of 300 parking stalls in Clearwater Beach, Florida Site: The Parking Structure will be built on the .93 acres located on 5th Street between Hamden and Coronado in Clearwater Beach. Purchaser And Seller: The Purchaser shall be the City of Clearwater. The Seller shall be Lucca Development or a designated assignee. Purchase Price Or Lease Proposal: The purchase price shall be $30,000 per approved parking pad. The 300 parking stalls would equate $9,000,000. Lease 300 parking spaces for $3,500 per stall, per year. The lease would be Triple net lease with shared 50/50 revenue on income above $3,500 per space. Seller's Intended Use: Lucca Development intends to develop this site in substantial conformance with the plans which will be submitted to the City of Clearwater, consisting of 396+ parking units. Approval: It is understood that this term letter is a proposal for dialog and negotiation and all is contingent upon City Council's approval. Due Diligence Period: The City of Clearwater will be entitled to conduct any due diligence tests and feasibility studies it deems necessary. Time Line: We can commence construction within 6 months or a timeline mutually agreed upon. The closing of the parking stalls shall be within 10 days following either the Certificate of Occupancy from the City of Clearwater or an Approval Letter from an Independent Engineer registered with the State of Florida. Expiration of Term Letter: Notwithstanding anything to the contrary, if this Term letter is not engaged by Purchaser by November 30, 2006, it will be deemed expired. s 40" r Due Diligence Period: The City of Clearwater will be entitled to conduct any due diligence tests and feasibility studies it deems necessary. Time Line: Lucca Development, LLC, shall commence construction within 6 months of execution of a Development Agreement and Purchase Contract, approved by the Clearwater City Council, and further agrees to complete construction within 18 months of commencement. The closing of the purchase of the spaces by the City shall occur no later than 30 days after the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for the structure. Approval: It is understood that this term letter is a non- binding document for negotiation only. Neither the Seller nor the Purchaser shall have any legal obligation to the other unless and until a Development Agreement and Purchase Agreement is approved by the Clearwater City Council and is fully executed by authorized representatives of both Seller and Purchaser Expiration of Term Letter: Notwithstanding anything to the contrary, if this Term Letter is not executed by the Seller and Purchaser by December 31 st, 2006, it will be deemed expired. 2 Pinellas County Property App— er Information: 07 29 15 52380 000 0 Page 2 of 5 07 l 29 I, 15 I 52380 1 000 I 0630 i8- Jun -2007 Jim Smith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 16:06:43 Ownership Information Non - Residential Property Address, Use, and Sales LUCCA DEVELOPMENT LLC OBK: 14632 OPG: 2035 9011 S NATOMA AUE OAK LAWN IL 60453 -1466 EVAC: A EVAC Comparable sales value as Prop Addr: 325 S GULFUIEW BLVD of Jan 1, 2006, based on Census Tract: 260.02 sales from 2004 - 2005: 0 Sale Date OR Book /Page Price (Qual /UnQ) Vac /Imp Plat Information 9 /2,005 14,63212,035 10,320,000 (M) I 1925: Book 013 Pgs 012 -013 0 11,968 2,873/ 215 25,000 (U) U 0000: Book Pgs - 0 /0 0/ 0 0 { ) 0000: Book Pgs - 0 /0 01 0 0 { ) 2006 Value EXEMPTIONS Just /Market: 6,872,300 Homestead: NO Ownership .000 Govt Exem: NO Use %: .000 Assessed /Cap: 6,872,300 Institutional Exem: NO Tax Exempt %: .000 Historic Exem: 0 Taxable: 6,872,300 Agricultural: 0 2006 Tax Information .District: Cu Seawall: Frontage: Clearwater View: 06 Millage: 21.7640 Land Size Unit'Land Land Land Front'x Depth Price Units Meth 06 Taxes: 149, 568. 74 1) 240 x 110 150.00 26,400.00 S Special Tax .00 2) 275 x 100_ 150.00 27, 500.00 S 3) 0 x 0 .00 .00 Without the Save -Our -Homes 4) 0 x 0 .00 .00 cap, 2006 taxes will be : 5) 0 x 0 .00 .00 149, 568. 74 6) 0 x 0 . 00 . 00 Without any exemptions, 2006 taxes will be 149, 568.74 Short Legal LLOYD - WHITE - SKINNER SUB LOTS 63 THRU 66 AND LOTS Description 113 THRU 117 AND S 112 OF LOT 112 L Building Information http: // 136 .174.187.13 /htbin/cgi- scr3 ?o =1 &a =1 &b =1 &c =1 &r= .16 &s= 4 &t3 =1 &u= 0 &p =07... 6/18/2007 Pinellas County Property Apper Information: 07 29 15 52380 000 0� Page 3 of 5 Property and Land Use Code descriptions 07 29 1 15 I 52380 1 000 0030 :01 18- Jun -2007 Jim Smith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 16:06:43 Commercial Card 01 of i Improvement Type: Mult Res Apt C4 St Property Address: 325 S GULFVIEW BLVD Prop Use: 312 Land Use: 39 Structural E1�m�en-ts Foundation Special Footing Floor System Structural Slab Exterior ball Conc Block /Stucco Height Factor 0 Party Wall None Structural Frame Concrete Reinforced Roof Frame Prestress Concrete Roof Cover Built Up /Composition Cabinet & Mill Average Floor Finish Carpet Combination Interior Finish Drywall Total Units 0 Heating & Air Heating &Cooling Pckg Fixtures 192 Bath Tile Floor + Half Wall Electric Average Description Factor Shape Factor U Design 1) Quality Average 1.00 Year Built 11982 Effective Age 15 Other Depreciation 0 Function Depreciation 0 Economic Depreciation 0 Sub ArE3as CammE3r(--lal E>ctra Fcatu.res Description Factor Area Units Description Factor Area 1) Base Area 1.00 25,776 7) . 00 0 2) Office Area 1.05 2,936 8) .00 0 3) Open Porch .30 12,482 9) .00 0 4) Utility .40 9,738 10) .00 0 5) 1 .00 0 11) .00 0 6) 3,500.00 .00 0 12) .00 0 CammE3r(--lal E>ctra Fcatu.res Map With Property Address (non- vacant) COMMONS http: // 136 .174.187.13 /htbin /cgi- scr3 ?o =1 &a =1 &b =1 &c =1 &r= .16 &s= 4 &t3 =1 &u= 0 &p =07... 6/18/2007 Description Dimensions Price Units Value RCD Year 1) POOL 20X40 75,000.00 1 75,000 30,000 1,982 2) PATIO /DECK 39359F 12.00 3,935 47,220 18,890 1,982 3) ASPHALT 6iX200 1.75 121200 21,350 21,350 1,982 4) ELEU PASS 5STOP 40, 000.00 1 40, 000 16,000 1, 982 . 5) ELEU STOP 5STOP 3,500.00 5 17,500 7,000 1,982 6) .00 0 0 0 0 TOTAL RECORD VALUE: 93,240 Map With Property Address (non- vacant) COMMONS http: // 136 .174.187.13 /htbin /cgi- scr3 ?o =1 &a =1 &b =1 &c =1 &r= .16 &s= 4 &t3 =1 &u= 0 &p =07... 6/18/2007 Pinellas County Property Apper Information: 07 29 15 52380 000 06 Page 4 of 5 GULFVIEW BLVD TH Ate' T U�' � H 5 "' 1/8 Mile Aerial Photograph (2002) http:// 136.174.187.13/ htbin /cgi- scr3 ?o =I &a =l &b =1 &c =1 &r= .16 &s= 4 &t3 =1 &u= 0 &p =07... 6/18/2007 Pinellas County Property App . er Information: 07 29 15:52281) 000 0 - b 5 of 5 l6 Pinellas County Prop -rty Appraiser Parcel Information BLck to Search Page As explanation of this screen http: // 136 .174.187.131htbinlcgi- scr2"o =1 &a =1 &b =18--=1 &r= .16 &s= 4 &t3 =1 !iu=0 &z=07... 6, - 8/2007 Pinellas County Property Ap p er Information: 07 29 15'52380 000 0jj Page 2 of 6 07 / 29 / 15 / 52380 / 000 / 1110 i8- Jun -2007 Jim Smith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 16:25:47 Ownership Information Non - Residential Property Address, Use, and Sales LUCCA DEVELOPMENT LLC OBK: 14632 OPG: 2035 9011 S HATOMA AUE OAK LAWN IL 60453 -1466 EVAC: A EUAC Comparable sales value as Prop Addr: 326 CORONADO DR of Jan 1, 2006, based on Census Tract: 260.02 sales from 2004.- 2005: 0 Sale Date OR Book /Page Price {Qual /UnQ} Vac /Imp Plat Information 9 12,005 14,632/2,035 10,320,000 {M} I 1925: Book 013 Pgs 012 -013 7 /1,998 10,161/2,122 325,000 {0} I 0000: Book Pgs - 8 /1,993 8,376/2,008 365,000 {U} I 0000: Book Pgs - 0 /1,969 3,236/ 71 52,500 {U} I 2006 Value EXEMPTIONS Just /Market: 956,300 Homestead: NO Ownership .000 Govt Exem: NO Use %: .000 Assessed /Cap: 956,300 Institutional Exem: NO Tax Exempt: .000 Historic Exem: 0 Taxable: 956,300 Agricultural: 0 2006 Tax Information District: Cu Seawall: Frontage: Clearwater View: 06 Millage: 21.7640 Land Size Unit Land Land Land Front x Depth Price Units Meth .06 Taxes: 201812.91 1} 75 x 100 150. 00 7,500. 00 S Special Tax .00 2} 0 x 0 .00 .00 3} 0 x 0 .00 .00 Without the Save -Our -Homes 4} 0 x 0 .00 .00 cap, 2006 taxes will be : 5} 0 x 0 .00 .00 20, 812.91 6} 0 x 0 .00 . 00 Without any exemptions, 2006 taxes will be 20, 812.91 Short Legal LLOYD- WHITE - SKINNER SUB LOT Ili & H 1/2 OF LOT 112 Description L Building Information http ://136:174.187.13 /htbin/cgi- click ?o =1 &a =1 &b =1 &c =1 &r= .16 &s= 4 &t3 =1 &u= 0 &p =0... 6/18/2007 i Pinellas County Property App er Information: 07 29 15 52380 000 0 Page 3 of 6 . B-u ld ng._1 . Building 2 Building #1 07 / 29 / 15 / 52380 / 000 / 1110 :01 18- Jun -2007 Jim Smith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 16:25:47 Commercial Card 01 of 2 Improvement Type: Motels Res Const Property Address: 326 CORONADO DR Prop Use: 313 Land Use: 39 S- truc-tural Elt�!mq--nts Foundation Continuous Footing Floor System Slab on Grade Exterior Wall Conc Block /Stucco Height Factor 0 Party Wall None Structural Frame None Roof Frame Gable & Hip Roof Cover Composition Shingle Cabinet & Mill Average Floor Finish Carpet Combination Interior Finish Drywall Total Units 0 Heating & Air Heating &Cooling Pckg Fixtures 8 Bath Tile Floor and Wall Electric Average Description Factor Shape Factor Rectangle 1) Quality Average i. 00 Year Built 1,954 Effective Age 30 Other Depreciation 0 Function Depreciation 0 Economic Depreciation 0 S ub Ar E3 .-a S 4 Gommt--.rcial E>c-tra Fc--a-turE3 s Description Factor Area Units Description Factor Area 1) Base Area i. 00 1,492 7) .00 0 2) Base Semi Finished .80 607 8) .00 0 3) Open Porch .20 63 9) .00 0 4) 720 .00 0 10) .00 0 5) 1 .00 0 11) .00 0 6) .00 .00 0 12) .00 0 Gommt--.rcial E>c-tra Fc--a-turE3 s Building #2 http ://136.174.187..1.3 /htbin/cgi- click ?o =1 &a =1 &b =1 &c =1 &r= .16 &s= 4 &t3 =1 &u= 0 &p =0... 6/18/2007 Description Dimensions Price Units Value RCD Year 1) ASPHALT 8X200 1.75 1,600 21800 2,800 1,954 2) CONC PAUE 380SF 4.00 380 1,520 1,520 1,954 3) PATIO /DECK 12OSF 6.00 120 720 430 1,992 4) FIREPLACE AUG 21500.00 1 2,500 1,000 1,954 5) .00 0 0 0 0 6) 00 0 0 0 0 TOTAL RECORD VALUE: 5,750 Building #2 http ://136.174.187..1.3 /htbin/cgi- click ?o =1 &a =1 &b =1 &c =1 &r= .16 &s= 4 &t3 =1 &u= 0 &p =0... 6/18/2007 { Pinellas County Property Apper Information: 07 29 15 52380 000 0� Page 4 of 6 07 ,l 29 / 15 1 52880 1 000 1114 :02 18- Jun -2007 Jim Smith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 16:25:47 Commercial Card 02 of 2 Improvement Type: Motels Res Const Property Address: 0 Prop Use: 313 Land Use: 39 Structural ElarncrttEm- Foundation Continuous Footing Floor System Slab on Grade Exterior Wall Conc Block /Stucco Height Factor 0 Party Wall None Structural Frame None Roof Frame Flat Roof Cover Built Up /Composition Cabinet & Mill Average ' Floor Finish Carpet Combination Interior Finish Drywall Total Units 0 Heating & Air Heating &Cooling Pckg Fixtures 9 Bath Tile Wall Only Area Electric Average Description Factor Shape Factor Rectangle 1) Quality Average 1.00 Year Built 1,964 Effective Age 6 Other Depreciation 0 Function Depreciation 0 Economic Depreciation 0 Sub Arsas Ca►mni(_-r(-_ial Extra Fcatures Description Dimensions Description Factor Area RCD Description Factor Area 1) Base Area 1.00 480 7) .00 0 2) Base Semi Finished .80 96 8) .00 0 3) Upper Stry Base Area .90 480 9) .00 0 4) Enclosed Porch .60 96 10) .00 0 5) Open Porch .15 119 11) .00 0 6) .00 0 12) .00 0 Ca►mni(_-r(-_ial Extra Fcatures Description Dimensions Price Units Value RCD Year 1) . 00 0 0 0 0 2) .00 0 0 0 0 3) .00 0 0 0 0 4) .00 0 0 0 0 5) .00 0 0 0 0 6) .00 0 0 0 0 TOTAL RECORD VALUE: 0 Map With Property Address (non- vacant) 0101911UNW001 http : //136.174.187.13/htbin/cgi- click ?o =l &a =1 &b =l &c =l &r= .16 &s= 4 &t3 =1 &u= 0 &p =0... 6/18/2007 Pinellas County Property App er Information: 07 29 15 52380 000.0 Page 5 of 6 1 i OUkF W 301 COFD }ONADO DR sr 4 DO i �i 26 H' CORONADO ��R HAhADEN �DORDR,+�C 326 �- --� -i OR A D O 332 LF VIEW BLVD + 325 GUL FV IEW BLVD 345 t�RDR DQ rT7 GULFVIE';tkf BLVD 301 COFD }ONADO DR sr 4 DO i �i 26 H' CORONADO ��R HAhADEN 1/8 Mile Aerial Photograph (2002) http: //l 36.174.187.13 /htbin/cgi- click ?o =1 &a =1 &b =1 &c =1 &r= .16 &s= 4 &t3 =1 &u= 0 &p =0... 6/18/2007 G UL UrIE'+q { - - BLVD `�` --•-�_ /co.� 345 t�RDR DQ rT7 ,l iBLI�CE 345 Dfi+ - -� -� ``~� 346 -.r1� �r 1/8 Mile Aerial Photograph (2002) http: //l 36.174.187.13 /htbin/cgi- click ?o =1 &a =1 &b =1 &c =1 &r= .16 &s= 4 &t3 =1 &u= 0 &p =0... 6/18/2007 Pinellas County Property AppWr Information: 07 29 15 52:. 0 0001 Page 6 of 6 Pinellas County Property App raiser Parcel Information zttp:// 136. 174.187.13[ -itbin/cgi- Dlick ?o =1 &a =1 &1:- =1 &c =1 &r=.1 E8�= 4ek-3 =I &u- -0&- D =0... 6/18/2007 L Pinellas County Property Apper Information: 07 29 15 52380 000 1� 08 I 29 / 15 I 17550 I 001 / 0120 Page 2 of 5 18- Jun -2007 Jim Smith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 16:26:21 Ownership Information Residential Property Address, Use, and Sales. LUCCA DEVELOPMENT LLC OBK: 14683 OPG: 2078 9011 S HATOMA AUE OAK LAWN IL 60453 -1466 EVAC: A EUAC Comparable sales value as Prop Addr: 345 CORONADO DR of Jan 1, 2006, based on- Census Tract: 260.02 sales from 2004 - 2005: 648,200 Sale Date OR Book /Page Price (Qual /UnQ) Vac /Imp Plat Information 1 /2,005 14,072} 186 475,000 (U) I 1945: Book 021 Pgs 079- 6 /2,000 10,961/ 555 190,000 (Q) I 0000: Book Pgs - 3 /1,995 8,9271 618 160,000 (Q) I 0000: Book Pgs - 11/1,992 8107811,895 70,000 (U) I 2006 Value EXEMPTIONS Just /Market: 544,200 Homestead: NO Ownership % .000 Govt Exem: NO Use %: .000 Assessed /Cap: 544,200 Institutional Exem: NO Tax Exempt: .000 Historic Exem: 0 Taxable: 544,200 Agricultural: 0 2006 Tax Information District: Cu Seawall: Frontage: Clearwater View: 06 Millage: 21.7640 Land Size Unit Land Land Land Front x Depth Price Units Meth 06 Taxes: 11,843.97 1) 60 x 110 80.00 6,600.00 S Special Tax .00 2) 0 x 0 .00 .00 3) 0 x 0 .00 .00 Without the Save -Our -Homes 4) 0 x 0 .00 .00 cap, 2006 taxes will be 5) 0 x 0 .00 .00 11, 843.97 6) 0 x 0 . 00 . 00 Without any exemptions, 2006 taxes will be 11, 843.97 Short Legal COLUMBIA SUB NO. 2 BLK A. LOT 12 Description L Building Information http : //136.174.187.13/htbin/cgi- click ?o =1 &a =1 &b =1 &c =1 &r= .16 &s= 4 &t3 =1 &u= 0 &p =0... 6/18/2007 4' Pinellas County Property Apper Information: 07 29 15 52380 000 1� Page 3 of 5 08 1 29 15 l 17586.1/ 041 1 0120 :01 18- Jun -2007 Jim Smith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 16:26:21 Residential Card 01 of i Prop Use: 220 Land Use: 08 Living Units: 3 Imp Type: Duplex /Triplex Prop Address: 345 CORONADO DR �- tructural E1�m�n-ts Foundation Continuous Wall Floor System Slab on Grade Exterior Wall ConcBk Stucco /Reclad Roof Frame Flat -Shed Roof Cover B U Tar &Gravel /Othr # Stories 1.0 Floor Finish Crpt /HdTl /HdMar /Prgt Interior Finish Drywall /Plaster Quality Average Year Built 1,951 Effective Age 30 Heating Central Duct Cooling Cooling (Central) Fixtures 9 Other Depreciation 0 Functional Depreciation 0 Econonomic Depreciation 0 Sub ArE3 as Description Factor Area Value Description Factor Area 1) . Base Area 1.00 1,768 7) .00 0 2) Open Porch .20 420 8) .00 0 3) .00 0 9) .00 0 4) .00 0 10) .00 0 5) .00 0 11) .00 0 6) .00 0 12) .00 0 R4--slcic:nT1.ai1 Extra FBaturBs Description Dimensions Price Units Value RCD Year 1) PATIOIDECK 7x27 6.00 189 1,130 450 1,951 . 2) .00 0 0 0 0 3) .00 0 0 0 0 4) . 00 0 0 0 0 5) .00 0 0 0 0 6) .00 0 0 0 0 TOTAL RECORD VALUE: 450 Map With Property Address (non- vacant) I;]% R R-1 F4_1 M 1"*�l http : / /l36.174.187.13/htbin/cgi- click? o =1 &a =1 &b =1 &c =1 &r= .16 &s= 4 &t3 =1 &u= 0 &p =0... 6/18/2007 Pinellas County Property Apper Information: 07 29 15 52380 000 1� Page 4 of 5 E GULFVIEW C RDt; -U) � BLVD - - -� _ -- coJ)J�J& D0 33 2 � H�.MDEI"•d ,3,33 GULFVIEW DR HANIDEN ' BLED DR B G +� G U 34 LO CDR NAD 3A 3 8 DR HAMDDEN 3A -- ;i.� L � _ 3 aG D I HDR ER H, MDEC `ti ORO DR GULFUIEt+ ,— R BLVD CORONADO - TH S T DR HAtTN 401 S J F— --7 GIJLF 1a W CORGNAD j�1-L— 176,10 1 � C A Alb HA Eqq ADEN F — --� GULF DR VIEW _C BLVD 'z.4 ail HA DREN l��tl 108 C C7IAD OJ "'"SID all 14 np 1/8 Mile Aerial Photograph (2002) http: // 136.174.187.13 /htbin/cgi- click ?o =l &a =l &b =l &c =1 &r= .16 &s= 44 &t3 =1 &u= 0 &p =0... 6/18/2007 T Nnellas Caxity Proper�.r Appi -er 1_4onnation: 07 29 15 523M D001 Page j of 5 0 Pinellaf County Property Appraiser- Parcel Informajon http: // 136 _- 74.187.1'j&tb_n/cgi- c- ick90 =- &a =l &b =1 &c =1 &r= _16 &s= 4 &t3 =1 &a= 0 &p =0... 6/18:2007 Pine;las County Property Apper Information: 08 29 15 17586 001 0 Page 2 of 5 08 / 29 1 15 l 17580 / 001 1 0130 18- Jun -2007 Jim Smith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 16:26:43 Ownership Information Non - Residential Property Address, Use, and Sales LUCCA DEVELOPMENT LLC OBK: 14505 OPG: 0995 9011 S HATOMA AUE OAK LAb1N IL 60453 -1466 EVAC: A EUAC Comparable sales value as Prop Addr: 347 CORONADO DR of Jan 1, 2006, based on Census Tract: 260.02 sales from 2004 - 2005: 0 Sale Date OR Book /Page Price (Qual /UnQ) Vac /Imp Plat Information 8 /2,005 14,505/ 995 3,400,000 (M) I 1945: Book 021 Pgs 079- 3 /2,002 11,898/2,287 1,802,500 (M) I 0000: Book Pgs - 6 /1,994 81705/1,920 641,700 (M) I 0000: Book Pgs - - 6 /1,994 8,705/1,919 333,700 (M) I 2006 Value EXEMPTIONS Just /Market: 448,800 Homestead: NO Ownership % .000 Govt Exem: NO Use %: .000 Assessed /Cap: 448,800 Institutional Exem: NO Tax Exempt %: .000 Historic Exem: 0 Taxable: 448,800 Agricultural: 0 2006 Tax Information District: Cu Seawall: Frontage: Clearwater View: 06 Millage: 21.7640 Land Size Unit Land Land Land Front x Depth Price Units Meth 06 Taxes: 9,767.68 1) 60 x 110 80.00 6,600.00 S Special Tax .00 2) 0 x 0 .00 .00 3) 0 x 0 .00 .00 Without the Save- Our -Homes 4) 0 x 0 .00 .00 cap, 2006 taxes will be : 5) 0 x 0 .00 .00 9,767.68 6) 0 x 0 . 00 . 00 Without any exemptions, 2006 taxes will be 9, 767. 68 Short Legal COLUMBIA SUB NO. 2 BLK A, LOT 13 Description L Building Information http: //l 36. 174. 187.13 /htbin/cgi- click? o =1 &a =1 &b =1 &c =1 &r= .16 &s= 4 &t3 =1 &u= 0 &p =0... 6/18/2007 .4 Pinellas County Property Apper Information: 08 29 15 17586 001 0 Page 3 of 5 0 / 29 / 15 / 17580 / 001 / 0130 :01 18- Jun -2007 Jim Smith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 16:26:43 Commercial Card 01 of i Improvement Type: Motels Res Const Property Address: 347, CORONADO DR Prop Use: 313 Land Use: 39 S- tructural E1em�nts Foundation Continuous Footing Floor System Wood W/ Subfloor Exterior Wall Concrete Block Height Factor 0 Party Wall Hone Structural Frame Hone Roof Frame Gable & Hip Roof Cover Composition Shingle Cabinet & Mill Average Floor Finish Carpet Combination Interior Finish Drywall Total Units 4 Heating & Air Heating &Cooling Pckg Fixtures 12 Bath Tile Wall Only Area Electric Average Description Factor Shape Factor U Design 1) Quality Average i. 00 Year Built 1,946 Effective Age 30 Other Depreciation 0 Function Depreciation 0 Economic Depreciation 0 Sub Aromas CommE3r4-_ial Extra F atur s Description Factor Area Value Description Factor Area 1) Base Area i. 00 1.941 7) . 00 0 2) Open Porch .15 35 8) .00 0 3) Detached Utility .30 63 9) .00 0 4) .00 0 10) .00 0 .5) .00 0 11) .00 0 6) .00 0 12) .00 0 CommE3r4-_ial Extra F atur s Map With Property Address (non- vacant) i http : //l 36.174.187.13/htbin/cgi- click ?o =1 &a =1 &b =1 &c =1 &r= .16 &s= 4 &t3 =1 &u= 0 &p =0... 6/18/2007 Description Dimensions Price Units Value RCD Year 1) ASPHALT 1000 1.75 1,000 11750 1,750 1,946 2) PATIO /DECK 400SF 6.00 400 . 2,400 960 1,'956 3) POOL 30,000.00 1 30,000 12,000 1,956 4) .00 0 0 0 0 5) .00 0 0 0 0 6) .00 0 0 0 0 TOTAL RECORD VALUE: 14,710 Map With Property Address (non- vacant) i http : //l 36.174.187.13/htbin/cgi- click ?o =1 &a =1 &b =1 &c =1 &r= .16 &s= 4 &t3 =1 &u= 0 &p =0... 6/18/2007 Pinellas County Property Apper Information: 08 29 15 17586 0010 E3LVD 3 4 -. DR-, - 1 C)R�I - + BLVD CO 4D 325 GULF VIEW C6 R '.DO BLVD ]IJLFVIEW IGUL F'ti! IEI 348 GRDR,�DO ,5 UULFVIEW mmmm PL'VrD TH FT r �„ L F � I E'; ?V BLVD UbLitD W 421 GULFVIEW BLVD U 1/8 Mile Aerial Photograph (2002) Page 4 of 5 333 HAMDEN DR DR BFI ER B 17640 F-- — 884 3 http: / /136.174.187.131htbinlcgi- click ?o =1 &a =1 &b =1 &c =1 &r= .16 &s= 4 &t3 =1 &u= 0 &p =0... 6/18/2007 E3LVD 3 4 -. GULFVIEW - + BLVD ]IJLFVIEW BLVD 348 GRDR,�DO ,5 UULFVIEW mmmm PL'VrD TH FT r �„ L F � I E'; ?V BLVD UbLitD W 421 GULFVIEW BLVD U 1/8 Mile Aerial Photograph (2002) Page 4 of 5 333 HAMDEN DR DR BFI ER B 17640 F-- — 884 3 http: / /136.174.187.131htbinlcgi- click ?o =1 &a =1 &b =1 &c =1 &r= .16 &s= 4 &t3 =1 &u= 0 &p =0... 6/18/2007 Pin jllas C,:)--mty Prxrzrty ?-pp�e- [nfo -m it �)n-- 0:> 2; 15 1 75 36 001 0]�Q Pale 5 of 5 Pinellas C 3 u my Prope rry Ap pra lser Parcel Information http://135.174.1 F :.l3/htHn/cgi- dick-?o =I &a. =1 &b =- &c =1 &r= .16 &s= 4 &t3 =1 &u= 0 & -3=0... 6/18/2007 Pinellas County Property App er Information: 08 29 15 17586 001 0 Page 2 of 5 0 08 / 29 / 15 / 17588 / 001 / 0140 18- Jun -2007 Jim Smith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 16:27:06 Ownership Information Non - Residential Property Address, Use, and Sales LUCCA DEVELOPMENT LLC OBK: 14505 OPG: 0995 9011 S HATOMA AVE OAK LAWN IL 60453 -1466 EVAC: A EUAC Comparable sales value as Prop Addr: 353 CORONADO DR of Jan 1, 2006, based on Census Tract: 260.02. sales from 2004 - 2005: 0 Sale Date OR Book /Page Price (Qual /UnQ) Vac /Imp Plat Information 8 /2,005 14,505/ 995 3,400,000 (M) I 1945: Book 021 Pgs 079- 3 /2,002 11,898/2,287 1,802,500 (M) I 0000: Book Pgs - 6 /1,994 8,705/1,920 641,700 (M) I 0000: Book Pgs - 6 /1,994 8,705/1,919 333,700 (M) I 2006 Value EXEMPTIONS Just /Market: 735,000 Homestead: NO Ownership % .000 Govt Exem: NO Use %: .000 Assessed /Cap: 735,000 Institutional Exem: NO Tax Exempt: .000 Historic Exem: 0 Taxable: 735,000 Agricultural: 0 2006 Tax Information District: Cu Seawall: Frontage: Clearwater View: 06 Millage: 21.7640 Land Size Unit Land Land Land Front x Depth Price Units Meth 06 Taxes: 15,996.54 1) 64 x 110 80.00 6,994.00 S Special Tax .00 2) 0 x 0 .00 .00 3) 0 x 0 .00 .00 Without the Save -Our -Homes 4) 0 x 0 .00 .00 cap, 2006 taxes will be : 5) 0 x 0 .00 .00 15, 996.54 6) 0 x 0 . 00 . 00 Without any exemptions, 2006 taxes will be 15, 996.54 Short Legal COLUMBIA SUB NO. 2 BLK A, LOT 14 Description L Building Information http: //l 36.174.187.13 /htbin / cgi- click ?o =1 &a =1 &b =l &c =l &r= .16 &s= 4 &t3 =1 &u= 0 &p =0... 6/18/2007 Pinellas County Property Apper Information: 08 29 15 17586 001 00 Page 3 of 5 05 1 29 / 151 17586 / 001 0140 :01 18- Jun -2007 Jim Smith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 16:27:06 Commercial Card 01 of i Improvement Type: Motel/Hotel C 4 St, Property Address: 353 CORONADO DR Prop Use: 313 Land Use: 39 Structural E1�m�nts Foundation Spread /Mono Footing Floor System Slab on Grade Exterior Wall Conc Block/Stucco Height Factor 0 Party Wall None Structural Frame Masonry Pillar &Steel Roof Frame Flat Roof Cover Built Up /Composition Cabinet & Mill Average Floor Finish Carpet Combination Interior Finish Drywall Total Units i5 Heating & Air None Fixtures 45 Bath Tile Floor and Wall Area Electric Average Description Factor Shape Factor Rectangle 1) Quality Average 1. 00 Year Built 1,953 Effective Age 30 Other Depreciation 0 Function Depreciation 0 Economic Depreciation 0 Sub ArE3as Commercial Extra FE3aturE3s Description Dimensions Description Factor Area RCD Description Factor Area 1) Base Area 1. 00 4,500 7) . 00 0 2) Open Porch .30 400 8) .00 0 3) 0 . 00 0 9) . . 00 0 . 4) 0 . 00 0 10) .00 0 5) 6) . 00 0 11) .00 0 6) . 00 0 12) .00 0 Commercial Extra FE3aturE3s Description Dimensions Price Units Value RCD Year 1) ASPHALT 16X200 1.75 3,200 5,600 5,600 1,953 2) SHUFBDCT 216 750.00 1 750 750 1,953 3) .00 0 0 0 0 4) .00 0 0 0 0 5) .00 0 0 0 0 6) .00 0 0 0 0 TOTAL RECORD VALUE: 6,350 Map With Property Address (non- vacant) F*_1 Polo I --t] F+1 FQ M http : //136.174.187.13/htbin/cgi- click ?o =1 &a =1 &b =1 &c =1 &r= .16 &s= 4 &t3 =1 &u= 0 &p =0... 6/18/2007 Pinellas County Property App40 er Information: 08 29 15 17586 001 04 2,S G'JL L1� IEW E3L'V`D GULFVIEW BL'V`D f 6 L�V OW X48 "C1RDp,,�DO L co - -j GULFVIEW BLVD TH ST, 401 GULFVIEW BLVD GULFVIEW ~� BL`V`D GULLS IEI�I BLVD DR r.u� G ' CR�1ADCi HxDR _ HAMDE - COFR,,i ADO/ DR .. r , ;1011� Page 4 of 5 H T 14`'�jA. E DR E— _ 17640 X88438 108 'YSID 110 DR qAyslp http: // 136 .174.187.13 /htbin/cgi- click ?o =l &a =1 &b =l &c =1 &r= .16 &s= 4 &t3 =1 &u= 0 &p =0... 6/18/2007 I Pinellas Co -inty Property Aplwr Infxmatior__ 09 29 1 ` 175 6 001 114 Pap 5 of 5 Pinellas County Property Apprais-27r- Parcel Information http: / /136.t74.187.13/htbinlc i click ?r—= &a= l- ib=1&-- I &x.16 &s74 &t3 =1 &L= ®dip =C-.. 6'1812007 # Pinellas County Property Apper Information: 08 29 15 17586 001 0� Page 2 of 6 08 / 29 / 15 17004 / 000 / 0080 18- Jun -2007 Jim Smith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 16:27:37 Ownership Information Non- Residential Property Address, Use, and Sales LUCCA DEUELOPMEHT LLC OBK: 14339 OPG: 1686 521 MANDALAY AUE # 1008 CLEARUTATER FL 33767 -1795 EVAC: A EUAC Comparable sales value as Prop Addr: 346 HAMDEN DR of Jan 1, 2006, based on Census Tract: 260.02 sales from 2004 - 2005: 0 Sale Date OR Book /Page Price (Qual/UnQ) Vac {Imp Plat Information 5 /2,005 14,33911,686 1,800,000 (U) I 1951: Book 027 Pgs 046- 2 /2,002 11,848/ 631 910,000 (Q) I 0000: Book Pgs - 1 /1,998 9,955/1,077 728,000 (Q) I 0000: Book Pgs - 0 /0 01 0. 0 { ) 2006 Value EXEMPTIONS Just /Market: 1,698,400 Homestead: NO Ownership % .000 Govt Exem: NO Use %: .000 Assessed /Cap: 1,698,400 Institutional Exem: NO Tax Exempt %: .000 Historic Exem: 0 Taxable: 1,698,400 Agricultural: 0 2006 Tax Information District: Cu Seawall: Frontage: Clearwater View: 06 Millage: 21.7640 Land Size 'Unit Land Land Land Front x Depth Price Units Meth 06 Taxes: 36,963.98 1) 121 x 110 150. 00 13,321. 00 S Special Tax .00 2) 0 x 0 .00 .00 3) 0 x 0 .00 .00 Without the Save -Our -Homes 4) 0 x 0 .00 .00 cap, 2006 taxes will be 5) 0 x 0 .00 .00 36, 963.98 6) 0 x 0 .00 .00 Without any exemptions, 2006 taxes will be 36,963. 98 Short Legal COLUMBIA SUB NO. 3 LOTS 8,9 AND 9A Description L Building Information http: // 136 .174.187.13 /htbin/cgi- click ?o =1 &a =1 &b =1 &c =1 &r= .16 &s= 4 &t3 =1 &u= 0 &p =0... 6/18/2007 t Pinellas County Property Apper Information: 08 29 15 17586 001 016 . BuildingI • Building 2 Building #1 Page 3 of 6 08 / 29 / 15 / 17004 / 000 / 0084 :01 18 -Jun -2007 Jim Smith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 16:27:37 Commercial Card 01 of 2 Improvement Type: Motel /Hotel C 4 St Property Address: 346 HAMDEN DR Prop Use: 313 Land Use: 39 Structural E1�mcnts Foundation Continuous Footing Floor System Slab on Grade Exterior Wall Conc Block /Stucco Height Factor 0 Party Wall None Structural Frame None Roof Frame Flat Roof Cover Built Up /Composition Cabinet & Mill Average Floor Finish Carpet Combination Interior Finish Drywall Total Units 6 Heating & Air None Fixtures 21 Bath Tile Wall Only Area Electric Average Description Factor Shape Factor Rectangle 1} Quality Average 1. 00 Year Built 1,956 Effective Age 30 Other Depreciation 0 Function Depreciation 0 Economic Depreciation 0 Sub Areas �G�orruticrcial Extra Fcaturss Description Factor Area Units Description Factor Area 1} Base Area 1. 00 3,043 7} . 00 0 2} Open Porch .30 715 g} .00 0 3} 480 .00 0 9} .00 0 4) 12,480 .00 0 10) .00 0 5} 1 .00 0 11} .00 0 6} .00 .00 0 12} .00 0 �G�orruticrcial Extra Fcaturss Building #2 http : //136.174.187.13/htbin/cgi- click ?o =1 &a =1 &b =1 &c =l &r= .16 &s= 4 &t3 =1 &u= 0 &p =0... 6/18/2007 Description Dimensions Price Units Value RCD Year 1} ASPHALT 14X200 1.75 2,800 4,900 4,900 1,956 2} PATIO /DECK 200 6.00 200 1,200 480 1,975 3} DOCK 312SF 40.00 312 12,480 4,990 1,975 4} POOL IRREG 30,000.00 1 30,000 12,000 1,975 5} .00 0 0 0 0 6} .00 0 0 0 0 TOTAL RECORD VALUE: 22,370 Building #2 http : //136.174.187.13/htbin/cgi- click ?o =1 &a =1 &b =1 &c =l &r= .16 &s= 4 &t3 =1 &u= 0 &p =0... 6/18/2007 Pinellas County Property. Apper Information: 08 29 15 17586 001 0� Page 4 of 6 08 1 29 15 { 17004 ! 000 ! 0080 :02 18- Jun -2007 Jim Smith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 16:27:36 Commercial Card 02 of 2 Improvement Type: Hotel /Hotel < 4 St Property Address: 0 Prop Use: 313 Land Use: 39 Structural E1cm�nts Foundation Continuous Footing Floor System Slab on Grade Exterior Wall Conc Block /Stucco Height Factor 0 Party Wall' None Structural Frame None Roof Frame Flat Roof Cover Built Up /Composition Cabinet & Mi11 Average Floor Finish Carpet Combination Interior Finish Drywall Total Units 7 Heating & Air None Fixtures 21 Bath Tile Wall Only Area Electric Average Description Factor Shape Factor Rectangle 1) Quality Average i. 00 Year Built 1,964 Effective Age 30 Other Depreciation 0 Function Depreciation 0 Economic Depreciation 0 Sul3 Ara;as GcammcrciaIL E>ctra FE3 atures Description Dimensions Description Factor Area RCD Description Factor Area 1) Base Area i. 00 2,608 7) . 00 0 2) Open Porch .30 500 8) .00 0 3) 0 .00 0 9) .00 0 4) 0 .00 0 10) . 00 0 5) 6) .00 0 11) .00 0 6) .00 0 12) . 00 0 GcammcrciaIL E>ctra FE3 atures Description Dimensions Price Units Value RCD Year 1) .00 0 0 0 0 2) .00 0 0 0 0 3) .00 0 0 0 0 4) .00 0 0 0 0 5) . 00 0 0 0 - 0 6) .00 0 0 0 0 TOTAL RECORD VALUE: 0 Map With Property Address (non- vacant) ®® ® ®M Fq http : //l 36.174.187.13/htbin/cgi- click ?o =1 &a =1 &b =1 &c =1 &r= .16 &s= 4 &t3 =1 &u= 0 &p =0... 6/18/2007 �, Pinellas County Property Apper Information: 08 29 15 17586 001 00 % -ULF'VIEW 7 B L' D G U L F'V I EdV BLVD TH ST GUk�Q V�Er 7640 ,1/: 88ZI 38 Page 5 of 6 bEftm ATEF ;LILFVIEVO .��� 421 Op- _ DR AYSI YSID I�0 ID BLVD %� rfr C � LIIp DP DR C R 1/8 Mile Aerial Photograph (2002) I http: // 136 .174.187.13 /htbin/cgi- click ?o =1 &a =1 &b =1 &c =1 &r= .16 &s= 4 &t3 =1 &u= 0 &p =0... 6/18/2007 Pinellas County Property App -- -ser Information: 08 29 15 17586 001 0' 10 Page 6 of 6 Pinellas County Property Appraiser Parcel Information http : / /l36.174.187.13/htbin/cgi- click ?o =1 &a =1 &b =1 &c =1 &r= .16 &s= 4 &t3 =1 &u= 0 &p =0... 6/18/2007 Pinellas County Property App er Information: 08 29 15 17604 000 0 Page 2 of 5 05 / 29 / 15 1 176041 000 / 0100 18- Jun -2007 Jim Smith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 16:28:02 Ownership Information Non - Residential Property Address, Use, and Sales LUCCA DEVELOPMENT LLC OBK: 14505 OPG: 0995 9011 S HATOMA AUE OAK LAWN IL 60453 -1466 EVAC: A EUAC Comparable sales value as Prop Addr: 350 HAMDEN DR of Jan 1, 2006, based on Census Tract: 260.02 sales from 2004 - 2005: 0 Sale Date OR Book /Page Price (Qual/UnQ) Vac /Imp Plat Information 8 /2,005 14,505/ 995 3,400,000 (M) I 1951: Book 027 Pgs 046- 3 /2,002 11,898/2,287 1,802,500 (M) I 0000: Book Pgs - 6 /1,994 8,705/1,920 641,700 (M) 0000: Book Pgs - 6 /1,994 8,705/1,9i8 308,000 (U) I 2006 Value EXEMPTIONS Just /Market: 894,300 Homestead: NO Ownership % .000 Govt Exem: NO Use %: .000 Assessed /Cap: 894,300 Institutional Exem: N0 Tax Exempt %: .000 Historic Exem: 0 Taxable: 894,300 Agricultural: 0 2006 Tax Information District: CW Seawall: Frontage: Clearwater View: 06 Millage: 21.7640 Land Size Unit Land Land Land Front x Depth Price Units Meth 06 Taxes: 19,4.63.55 1) 63 x 110 150. 00 7,014. 00 S Special Tax .00 2) 0 x 0 . 00 . 00 , 3) 0 x 0 .00 .00 Without the Save -Our -Homes 4) 0 x 0 .00 .00 cap, 2006 taxes will be : 5) 0 x 0 .00 .00 19,463.55 6) 0 x 0 .00 .00 Without any exemptions, 2006 taxes will be 19,463.55 Short Legal COLUMBIA SUB NO. 3 LOTS 10 AND 10A Description L Building Information http : //l 36.174.187.13/htbin/cgi- click ?o =1 &a =1 &b =1 &c =1 &r= .16 &s= 4 &t3 =1 &u= 0 &p =0... 6/18/2007 f Pinellas County Property Apper Information: 08 29 15 17604 000 0jo Page 3 of 5 08 1 29 / 15 I 17004 / 000 0100 :01 i8- Jun -2007 Jim.Smith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 16:28:02 Commercial Card 01 of i Improvement Type: Motel /Hotel t 4 St Property Address: 350 HAMDEN DR Prop Use: 313 Land Use: 39 Structural E1�m�nts Foundation Spread/Mono Footing Floor System Slab on Grade Exterior gall Conc Block /Stucco Height Factor 0 Party Wall None Structural Frame None Roof Frame Flat Roof Cover Built Up/Composition Cabinet & Mill Average Floor Finish Carpet Combination Interior Finish Drywall Total Units 14 Heating & Air None Fixtures 42 Bath Tile Floor and Wall Area Electric Average Description Factor Shape Factor Rectangle 1) Quality Average 1.00 Year Built 1,956 Effective Age 30 Other Depreciation 0 Function Depreciation 0 Economic Depreciation 0 Sub Aromas Commercial E3ctra FE3aturo--Em- Description Factor Area Value Description Factor Area 1) Base Area 1.00 2,754 7) . 00 0 2) Open Porch .30 948 8) .00 0 3) Utility .40 120 9) .00 0 4) Canopy .25 432 10) .00 0 5) Upper Stry Base Area .90 2,754 11) .00 0 6) .00 0 12) .00 0 Commercial E3ctra FE3aturo--Em- http : //l 36.174.187.13/htbin/cgi- click ?o =l &a =1 &b =1 &c =1 &r= .16 &s= 4 &t3 =1 &u= 0 &p =0... 6/18/2007 Description Dimensions Price Units Value RCD Year 1) ASPHALT 17X200 1.75 3,400 51950 5,950 1,956 2) SPAIJAC %HT 17,500.00 1 17,500 7,000 1,975 3) DOCK 576SF 40.00 576 23,040 13,820 1,992 4) .00 0 0 0 0 5) .00 0 0 0 0 6) .00 0 0 0 0 TOTAL RECORD VALUE: 26,770 http : //l 36.174.187.13/htbin/cgi- click ?o =l &a =1 &b =1 &c =1 &r= .16 &s= 4 &t3 =1 &u= 0 &p =0... 6/18/2007 Y Pinellas County Property Apper Information: 08 29 15 17604 000 0di 325 BLVD. GIJLFVIEW �t BLVD 3�_ GULFVIEW BLVD aULIEAf BLVD GOO Vi EtN B L D TH G U F � I EW BLVD VIEW VD 421 GULFVIEW BLVD 348 RONADO 'Q i� 65 TH -Mftftm !_ S T Page 4 of 5 �65910 I 17 , 4 0 ER a BRIG 'WAI � pp� ` N,�"DEtd ---� �� H 4 CR l ' �i D os FAN AiIDE n 1/8 Mile Aerial Photograph (2002) 121 .S LDE http: //136.174.187.13 /htbin/cgi- click ?o =l &a =l &b =1 &c =1 &r= .16 &s= 4 &t3 =1 &u= 0 &p =0... 6/18/2007 Pinellas County Property App - ---er Information: 08 29 15 17604 000 0010 Page 5 of 5 Pinellas County Property Appraiser Parcel Information http : / /136.174.187.13/htbin/cgi- click ?o =1 &a =1 &b =1 &c =1 &r= .16 &s= 4 &t3 =1 &u= 0 &p =0... 6/18/2007 9 5 C4 2�b o � Z j O o C ca Jw so 01) b bl voL� V 6 Z �6s 0 0 L�g; IZ v os Cl OL _I 0s U 0 .L3,34L S .t�3�lS 11 I os I, CM j z� LIZ 012 P, 7 r Wells, Wayne From: Delk, Michael Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2007 9:04 AM To: Irwin, Rod Cc: Wells, Wayne; Brumback, Garry Subject: FW: Lucca Development Property Rod - I didn't review this till this morning which is why it didn't get over yesterday. Sorry. Let me know if any questions. As we stated earlier, we will proceed with the new use only of public parking garage back to the CDB and separate that from the condo /conversion part. Please note other issues portion. If Marbella changed to all overnight at some point, based on proposed PPC rules, they could have 460 hotel rooms. michael Michael Delk, AICP Planning Director City of Clearwater, FL 727 - 562 -4561 myclearwater.com - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2007 9:00 AM To: Delk, Michael Subject: Lucca Development Property Michael - Attached is the information you have requested. Wayne W Facts and Issues Marbella Project for Lucca Dev... Unit Confirms... .t_ A` 0 r LUCCA DEVELOPMENT, LLC PROPERTY FACTS AND ISSUES March 21, 2007 MARBELLA PROJECT - 325 S. Gulfview Boulevard (including 326, 345, 347 and 353 Coronado Drive and 346 and 350 Hamden Drive) Under Case Nos. FLD2005- 02021 /TDR2005- 03020/PLT2005- 00010, the project was classified into three "Parcels" (Parcels A, B and Q. Parcel A included those properties between Coronado Drive and South Gulfview Boulevard (326 Coronado Drive and 325 S. Gulfview Blvd.). Parcel B included those properties between Coronado Drive and Hamden Drive (345 Coronado Drive, 347 — 353 Coronado Drive, 346 Hamden Drive and 350 Hamden Drive). Parcel C includes the small waterfront lots east of Hamden Drive associated with Parcel B lots and contain docks for the upland motels. The total project area under the Marbella project is 2.37 acres. The application approved by the CDB under Case Nos. FLD2005-02021/TDR2005- 03020/PLT2005 -00010 included a Termination of Status of Nonconformity (Termination) for density. There exists on Parcels A and B the equivalent of 119 overnight accommodation units, where only 93 overnight accommodation units are permitted at the then current maximum density of 40 units /rooms per acre. The application approved by the CDB under Case Nos. FLD2005-02021/TDR2005- 03020/PLT2005 -00010 included the Transfer of Development Rights (TDR) of 18 overnight accommodation units from 401 Coronado Drive and 406 Hamden Drive. These 18 overnight accommodation units, based on 40 overnight accommodation units /rooms per acre, also represented the maximum number of units (18) that could be transferred to the receiving site under the provisions of Section 4 -1402 (20% of 93 units = 18 units). The overall Marbella project included the 119 overnight accommodation units approved under the Termination regulations and the 18 overnight accommodation units approved under the TDR for a total of 137 overnight accommodation units. The Marbella project utilized the conversion of 137 overnight accommodation units to 102 dwelling units using the 40/30 conversion rule (multiply 137 overnight accommodation units by 0.75 = 102 dwelling units). ■ The Marbella project approved by the CDB consisted of 92 units on Parcel A and 10 units on Parcel B. The Marbella project is still a valid Flexible Development (FLD) project, as a Time Extension was approved requiring the submission of a building permit to January 19, 2008. A request for a maximum of one -year time extension may still be requested by the applicant, but must be approved by the CDB prior to the expiration date of January 19, 2008. The applicant has submitted a Minor Revision request for the Marbella project to relocate the 10 units on Parcel B to Parcel A, so that all 102 units will be on Parcel A. The Minor Revision is under staff review at this time. Based on Minor Revision plans submitted for the Marbella project (under review), all 102 dwelling units are located on Parcel A, but with only 189 parking spaces meeting Code requirements. The Marbella project approved by the CDB included a total of 239 parking spaces, at a ratio of 2.34 spaces per unit. At the current Code minimum requirement of two parking spaces per unit, a total of 204 spaces are required to be provided. With only 189 spaces that meet Code requirements provided on Parcel A, there are at least 15 spaces required on Parcel B for the Marbella project. ■ The approval of the Marbella project stands on its own at this time, having used the density, Termination and conversion rules in effect at the time of approval. The Termination rules have now been amended by City Council disallowing the conversion to a different use. While the City regulations have been changed to permit 50 overnight accommodation units per acre in the Tourist District, the Marbella project cannot avail itself of this increase in allowable density, due to City Council amending the Termination rules to disallow the conversion to a different use. Likewise, the developer cannot avail himself to the proposed Countywide rules allowing 125 overnight accommodation units per acre (minimum of three acres required), because the City Council amended the Termination rules to disallow the conversion to a different use, UNLESS the developer desires to abandon the current Marbella project in lieu of developing overnight accommodation units over the entire property (Marbella property and the Other Lucca Development, LLC Property listed below). OTHER LUCCA DEVELOPMENT, LLC PROPERTY 401 Coronado Drive — This site is a sending site for the TDR portion of the Marbella project. This site was previously developed with a restaurant and retail sales. An OCL request in 2004/2005 for a five -unit motel was denied by Planning, as it represented a change in use requiring either an FLS or FLD approval. An OCL request for an eight -unit motel is currently pending. 406 Hamden Drive — This site is a sending site for the TDR portion of the Marbella project. An OCL has been issued for an 18 -unit motel. Based on visual inspection, staff can only verify 15 units. The status of this issued OCL needs to be reviewed (may need to be revoked). 405 Coronado Drive — Presently developed with the Key Lime Inn. An occupational license (OCL) is pending at this time for eight units, but based on visual inspection, staff can only verify seven units. 415 Coronado Drive — Presently developed with the Falcon Motel. An OCL is pending at this time for 22 units (verified based on visual inspection). 419 Coronado Drive — Presently developed with the Gulf Beach Motel. A prior OCL listed this motel as 17 units. An OCL has been issued for a 20 -unit motel. Based on visual inspection, staff • • can only verify 16 units. The status of this issued OCL needs to be reviewed (may need to be revoked). OTHER ISSUES The applicant has provided information that the property Lucca Development,LLC owns beyond the Marbella project is 1.31 acres in size. This involves the property at 401 Coronado Drive, 405 Coronado Drive, 415 Coronado Drive, 419 Coronado Drive and 406 Hamden Drive. Based on 50 overnight accommodation units per acre, these 1.31 acres could be redeveloped with 65 overnight accommodation units, HOWEVER, this number must be reduced by the 18 units transferred from 401 Coronado Drive and 406 Hamden Drive to the Marbella project, leaving a maximum of 47 units to be developed on the 1.31 acres. The TDR sending site (401 Coronado Drive and 406 Hamden Drive) can derive the benefit of the increased density of 50 overnight accommodation units toward the redevelopment of the 1.31 acre property owned by Lucca Development, LLC south of 5t' Street. Should the applicant abandon the approved Marbella project in lieu of developing overnight accommodation units over the entire property ( Marbella property and the Other Lucca Development, LLC Property listed above), the entire property owned by Lucca Development, LLC totals 3.68 acres. At 125 overnight accommodation units per acre under the proposed Countywide rules, a total of 460 overnight accommodation units could be developed on the overall Lucca Development, LLC property. MARBELLA PROJECT UNIT CONFIRMATION March 15, 2007 FLD2 005 -02021 /TDR2005- 03020/PLT2005 -00010 325 S. Gulfview Boulevard (including 326, 345, 347 and 353 Coronado Drive and 346 and 350 Hamden Drive) PARCEL A 1. 325 South Gulfview Boulevard Clearwater Beachview Resort (formerly Howard Johnson Express Inn) 64 -room motel 2. 326 Coronado Drive Americana Gulf Resort 5 -unit motel PARCEL B 3. 345 Coronado Drive Lucca Development 3 dwelling units 4. 347 — 353 Coronado Drive + 350 Hamden Drive Tropicana 32 -unit motel 5. 346 Hamden Drive Albatross 12 -unit motel (there are 12 numbered rooms + room 14 + office) (now asking for a 16 -unit motel — see Pending OCL) SENDING SITES UNDER TDR2005 -03020 6. 406 Hamden Drive Bay Lawn Motel 15 -unit motel (there are eight numbered units downstairs, including the office unit, and seven numbered units upstairs) (see OCL — Issued for an 18 -unit motel ? ? ?) 4 ` 7. 401 Coronado Drive Back Street Used to be a restaurant and retail (see OCLs) (based on field investigation, there could be maybe the possibility of seven units, AFTER REMODELING. Some walls have been closed to re- create rooms. Restaurant used maybe 5 — 6 rooms. New stucco and paint on exterior) 5 -unit motel denied in 2004/2005 — need approval through FLS or FLD for change of use. (now asking for an 8 -unit motel — see Pending OCL) Page 1 of 1 Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2007 1:57 PM To: 'Luke Castrogiovanni' Cc: Delk, Michael Subject: RE: Luke - Attached are documents developed in response to your and Joe Burdette's questions. Hope this helps. Wayne - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Luke Castrogiovanni [mailto:luke.luccainc @comcast.net] Sent: Wednesday, February 21, 2007 12:58 PM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: Wayne, Please review the density that exists on my properties that are owned under the name of Fifth South, LLC. The density count should be as follows: Gulf Beach 20 Falcon Motel 22 Backstreet Motel 8 Bay Lawn 18 Key Lime 8 Total Units =76 Subtract 18 units for the transfer to Lucca Development leaves 58 available. Please confirm ASAP. An appraiser is awaiting the information. Thanks for your help. Luke Castrogiovanni Lucca Development, LLC 9011 S. Natoma Ave Oak Lawn, IL 60453 (708)430 -0905 (708)430 -3720 Fax 3/21/2007 .„ Page 1 of 2 Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2007 1:51 PM To: 'Hunraf @aol.com' Cc: luke.luccainc @comcast.net; Delk, Michael Subject: RE: Joe Burdette - Density question for Marbella Joe - I have had to spend a lot of time researching Lucca Development, LLC property, including the Marbella project, to provide an answer. This has included a site visit to confirm the existing development on each site. First Question: The 1.31 acres (acreage provided by you) is south of 5th Street, between Coronado Drive and Hamden Drive, and includes 401, 405, 415 and 419 Coronado Drive and 406 Hamden Drive. This overall property can derive the benefit of the Code amendment revising the maximum density to 50 overnight accommodation units /rooms per acre. Under this scenario, this overall property would allow a maximum of 65 overnight accommodation units /room, but must be reduced by the 18 units /rooms transferred to the Marbella project. Therefore, a maximum of 47 overnight accommodation units /rooms could be developed on this 1.31 overall acres. As for whether, due to the density revision, individual properties under this overall 1.31 acres are now "conforming" to density regulations is murky. I have attached documents which discuss the issues and facts regarding the Marbella project and the other Lucca Development, LLC property and the Marbella project unit confirmation information. Second Question: Since the Marbella project utilized Termination of Status of Nonconformity for density and conversion from overnight accommodation units to residential units and since City Council amended the Termination provisions in the Code disallowing the conversion to a different use under the Termination provisions, UNLESS the developer desires to abandon the current Marbella project in lieu of developing overnight accommodation units over the entire property (Marbella property and other Lucca Development, LLC property), the developer cannot avail himself of the proposed Countywide rules allowing 125 overnight accommodation units per acre (minimum of three acres required). If the developer desires to construct overnight accommodation units over the entire 3.68 acres, using the proposed Countywide density rules, then the overall 3.68 acres could be developed with a maximum of 460 overnight accommodation units. If you have additional questions, let me know. Wayne - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Hunraf @aol.com [mailto:Hunraf @aol.com] Sent: Thursday, February 22, 2007 11:41 AM To: Wells, Wayne Cc: luke.luccainc @comcast.net Subject: Joe Burdette - Density question for Marbella 3/21/2007 a Page 2 of 2 Wayne Here are the question posed yesterday by Luke. First Question: He has 1.31 acres remaining to build on. Under the old code (40 units per acre for motels) he would have been allowed 52 units. When he bought the property 76 existed. He transferred 18 units to the Marbella Project and converted them into condos leaving him 58 units. Subsequently the code changed to allow 50 units per acre for motels. 1.31 x 50 = 65 units. Does that now make all of his remaining units "conforming "? Second Question: What Luke was saying is that if he took the entire piece of property including the Marbella Project he would have 3.67 acres. If the county density passes he would be eligible for 458 units (more than three acres will be eligible for 125 units per acre under the proposed county plan). He used 137 total hotel units for the Marbella project for the conversion to 102 condo units. So what he was asking was can he now apply the following formula: 458 total units - 137 units 321 units remaining for hotel use Those are the questions Joe AOL now offers free email to everyone. Find out more about what's free from AOL at AOL.com. 3/21 /2007 Page 1 of 1 Wells, Wayne From: Hunraf @aol.com Sent: Thursday, February 22, 2007 11:41 AM To: Wells, Wayne Cc: luke.luccainc @comcast.net Subject: Joe Burdette - Density question for Marbella Wayne Here are the question posed yesterday by Luke. First Question: He has 1.31 acres remaining to build on. Under the old code (40 units per acre for motels) he would have been allowed 52 units. When he bought the property 76 existed. He transferred 18 units to the Marbella Project and converted them into condos leaving him 58 units. Subsequently the code changed to allow 50 units per acre for motels. 1.31 x 50 = 65 units. Does that now make all of his remaining units "conforming "? Second Question: What Luke was saying is that if he took the entire piece of property including the Marbella Project he would have 3.67 acres. If the county density passes he would be eligible for 458 units (more than three acres will be eligible for 125 units per acre under the proposed county plan). He used 137 total hotel units for the Marbella project for the conversion to 102 condo units. So what he was asking was can he now apply the following formula: 458 total units - 137 units 321 units remaining for hotel use Those are the questions Joe AOL now offers free email to everyone. Find out more about what's free from AOL at AOL.com. 3/9/2007 Page 1 of 1 Wells, Wayne From: Luke Castrogiovanni [luke.luccainc @comcast.net] Sent: Wednesday, February 21, 2007 12:58 PM To: Wells, Wayne Wayne, Please review the density that exists on my properties that are owned under the name of Fifth South, LLC. The density count should be as follows: Gulf Beach 20 A 19 CL, r- o r . � v Falcon Motel 22 4 1:S' Co r -O • Backstreet Motel 8 IT 401 • Bay Lawn 18 A t U -Key Lime 8 i-O ! Total Units =76 Subtract 18 units for the transfer to Lucca Development leaves 58 available. Please confirm ASAP. An appraiser is awaiting the information. Thanks for your help. Luke Castrogiovanni Lucca Development, LLC 9011 S. Natoma Ave Oak Lawn, IL 60453 (708)430 -0905 (708)430 -3720 Fax 2/21/2007 FLORIDA-` D PROFESSION P U 01/30/2007 lo,60509414:.IMOT�6204�l�34�,:,��,..�,:�:�NBR ./22 �O NITS. i L07013000808 Ac# 10 52 2 ...STATE OF FLORIDA - DEPARTMENT -OF B1d.9IXES9..ANM) PROFk Sib"t,- REGULATION -D ivi-STOR., OF':- AND RESTAURANTS 0 LICENSE NBR 101/.30/2007.1060,509564 ��IkQ'r- TS The MOTEL (2002) Named below IS LICENSED: _ Under the provisions:61 Chapter 569 S, Ad T A MR"; Expiration date: FEB 1 2008 LUCCA, DE WEL 69MEXT LLo'�_'.-P, `8ACKSTRZET"i-MOTEL- 401 CORONAbO CLEARWATER BCH FL�,33767 CHARLIE CRIST HOLLY..�'-BEN GOVERNOR DISPI-AY AS RPQI-IIRF=n RYI AW ,SECRETARY - 01/30/2007,1060.509636 -.1MOT6 202 K. 150- UNITS ' CHARLIE CRTST 20 ON SEQ#L0701300080.7 kOLLY J:'BENSON �' c�r�► • I tr'L C 1 Z nvwl•y-cc� r,00wa� -t 1� •�- o 'cam 4� CAS �1 ^4 d UY%j alp rvt\T 4! 1 i B� t o Z Z rt�a w-Y .►7 2_o ar- i I . x 347-5-1-"3 Corov-,&�Q rmb 9Aa2 .a. 3Z �J�-c-�•�,a.ol- --"r tZZoo urn, Q. `r ;;, U fa x St1 r�tl+r•� f b. a r� 7 c�r+0e.►i x 4a c,rw`,� - 4 cvorc 02A 267A 0 MIER I, PREPARED BY PUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATION - ....... ... ... .......... . ENGINEERING I GIS ............ . . . er • 100 S. Myrtle Ave., Clearwater, FL 33766 ..... . .... P Ph.: (727)5624750, Fax: (727)526-4755 . ........................... www.MyClearwater.com .. ........ .......... . ... -1-dbyft== ft d., • . . . ........... -j Iftc0ac= �PWAIE Oft -IVW- d- ............ . # N u ........... . . .... -MW ar� W ... r. w ....... ... 1u 0 ............... .. . ............. . . j... ... . ..... .. .......... ... PMIA, nea •HyPplWrarprer mwmb Dos r- -1 .7 L2 ..3nm SPEG USE DI-; T:� D. .... ...... !4 6 City Owned Property . . 302,0 WAnNI Agreement to Annex !lL 7 . ........... Annexation o Deannexation . ... ..... ......... Corniction 0 Rezoning , nu ........... n 1 I LZ --j P L.5!� -j 7 1-- SUB NUMBER r- R.I., to PIM) . ........................ 0 BLOCK NUMBER m. ..... .......... SUB PARCEL NUMBER ................. . . ....... r- PARCEL NUMBER (M&B) .......... . .. LAND HOOK (COMMON OWNER PLATTED SUBDVVISION BOUNDARY Ejj COUNTY HIGHWAY STATE HIGHWAY U.S. HIGHWAY Outside City of Clearwater Ir Zoning Atlas # 'r. A --------------------------------------- ---------- - - -------------------------- r ------- Apr 07, 2005 SW 114 of 32-28- 15 r L-r=- -j- 276A ED USA i `�6 CASE SUMMARY OCL9046391 325 S GULFVIEW BLVD • • CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES O MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVE. CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 PHONE (727) 562 -4567 FAX (727) 562 -4576 HOWARD JOHNSON EXPRESS INN 64 unit hotel /motel and 3 parking spaces allowed to rent out. PEOPLE Role: Business Owner FEES BUSINESS TAX - RENEWAL DECEMBER DELINQUENT 5 LICENSE FEE - NEW LICENSE FEE - RENEWAL NOVEMBER DELINQUENT 5 OCTOBER DELINQUENT 10 TRANSFER FEE Total OCCUPATIONAL LICENSE AMERICANA GULF MOTELS LTD ATTN: DOROTHY BOLDOG 325 S GULFVIEW BLVD CLEARWATER, FL 33767 -2445 PHONE: (727) 442 -9983 FAX: No Fax Assessed Amount Amount Paid Balance Due $160.30 $160.30 $0.00 $8.01 $8.01 $0.00 $151.90 $151.90 $0.00 $1,092.65 $1,092.65 $0.00 $8.02 $8.02 $0.00 $16.03 $16.03 $0.00 $3.00 $3.00 $0.00 $1,439.91 $1,439.91 $0.00 Category Quantity 091000 RENTAL: SINGLE FAMILY/ DUPLEX 64 016051 PARKING LOT: PERMANENT OR T 3 ACTIVITIES Date 1 Date 2 Date 3 # Employees 0 0 Done Disp By 0 2—) 1 1-) 0-7 Issue License - RENEWAL 12/7/2000 DONE BLS 00/01 Additional Requirements Needed 12/7/2000 DONE BLS see hold file - over paid returning check - need $118.95 -- paid fee 12 -7 -00 Issue License - RENEWAL 8/20/2001 DONE RRP 01 -02 Additional Requirements Needed 9/3/2002 DONE WBS 7/9/01 - GENERAL MANAGER (BETTY VELEY) CAME IN TO CHANGE NAME FROM "AMERICANA GULF RESORT' TO "HOWARD JOHNSON EXPRESS INN" - NEED TO SEE STATE LICENSE WITH NAME CHANGE PRIOR TO CHANGING ON LICENSE. APP WITH NAME CHANGE IN PENDING FILE(JMP) Issue License - RENEWAL 10/19/1998 DONE BLS rAForms \I nfoSu m mary. rpt dCL90*6391 325 S GULFVIEW 13LVD • Issue License - RENEWAL 8/14/1999 DONE GBD Issue License 10/30/1997 DONE BLB Renewal Notice 7/25/1997 7/97 BATCH Renewal Notice 7/28/1998 7/98 BATCH Renewal Notice 7/21/1999 7/99 BATCH Renewal Notice 7/18/2000 7/00 BATCH Renewal Notice 7/25/2001 7/01 BATCH Renewal Notice 7/27/2002 FY 02/03 BATCH Issue License - RENEWAL 9/3/2002 DONE WBS 02 -03 Renewal Notice 7/11 /2003 03/04 Issue License - RENEWAL 9/12/2003 DONE 2003 -2004 Renewal Notice 7/26/2004 04/05 Issue License - RENEWAL 10/1/2004 DONE 2004 -2005 Zoning Review 3/2/2005 3/2/2005 DONE JVS Traffic /Engineering 3/2/.2005 3/2/2005 DONE Bennett Elbo Override - Parcel Holds 3/2/2005 DDR Override - Parcel Holds 3/2/2005 DDR Override - Parcel Holds 3/2/2005 DDR Override - Parcel Holds 3/2/2005 DDR Override - Parcel Holds 3/2/2005 DDR Override - Parcel Holds 3/2/2005 DDR Issue License - NEW 04/05 3/2/2005 DONE DDR update Renewal Notice 7/22/2005 FY2005 -2006 Second Renewal Notice 10/13/2005 2005 -2006 Issue License - RENEWAL 12/20/2005 DONE 2005 -2006 Renewal Notice 7/21/2006 2006-2007 ISSUE - Business Tax Renewal 8/23/2006 DONE 2006 -2007 Business Closed 2%12/2007 DONE JAC r:\Forms\1nfoSummary.rpt &L9046391, 325 S GULFVIEW BLVD • r: \Forms \I nfoSu m mary. rpt CASE SUMMARY OCL- 0022246 ;325 S GULFVIEW BLVD � s CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING 100 SOUTH'MYRTLE AVE. CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 PHONE (727) 562 -4567 FAX (727) 562 -4576 'CLEARWATER BEACHVIEW RESORT 64 unit hotel /motel and 3 parking spaces allowed to rent out. STATE LICENSE MOT6207769 PEOPLE Role: Owner /Property Business Owner FEES TRANSFER FEE LUCCA DEVELOPMENT LLC 9011 S NATOMA AVE OAK LAWN, IL 60453 FIFTH SOUTH, LLC 325 S GULFVIEW BLVD CLEARWATER, FL 33767 Assessed Amount $16.03 Total $16.03 Amount Paid $0.00 $0.00 OCCUPATIONAL LICENSE Category Quantity 091000 'RENTAL: SINGLE FAMILY/ DUPLEX 64 016051 PARKING LOT: PERMANENT OR T 3 ACTIVITIES Date 1' Date 2 Date 3 Traffic /Engineering 2/12/2007 2/12/2007 Application received 2/12/2007 PHONE: No Phone FAX: No Fax PHONE: 727 - 461 -7695 FAX: No Fax Balance Due $16.03 $16.03 # Employees 0 t Z ` V7 1 1� 6 6 Done Disp By DONE JAC JAC Zoning Review 2/12/2007 ALL OTHER APPLICATIONS FOR FIFTH SOUTH LLC ARE ATTACHED TO THE FILE FOR 401 CORONADO DRIVE - MANY LICENSE, THIS NEED TO BE APPROVED BY WAYNE WELLS PRIOR TO ISSUANCE Proof of Corporation 2/12/2007 DONE JAC State License Verified 2/12/2007 DONE JAC Placed in Pending Folder 3/2/2007 '3/2/2007 DONE JAC ALL OTHER APPLICATIONS FOR FIFTH SOUTH LLC ARE ATTACHED TO THE FILE FOR 401 CORONADO DRIVE - MANY LICENSE, THIS NEED TO BE APPROVED BY WAYNE WELLS PRIOR TO ISSUANCE r: \Forms \I nfoS u m mary. rpt CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES Jsvec� N MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING 4 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVE. CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 PHONE (727) 562 -4567 FAX (727) 562 -4576 CASE SUMMARY OCL9037891 326 CORONADO DR AMERICANA GULF RESORT Lic: 08266 PEOPLE Role: Business Owner FEES BUSINESS TAX - RENEWAL DECEMBER DELINQUENT 5 LICENSE FEE - RENEWAL NOVEMBER DELINQUENT 5 OCTOBER DELINQUENT 10 Total AMERICANA GULF MOTELS LTD GILMAR AND SON INC 325 S GULFVIEW BL CLEARWATER, FL 33767 -2432 Assessed Amount $30.00 $1.50 $248.75 $1.50 $3.00 $284.75 PHONE: (727) FAX: No Fax Amount Paid Balance Due $30.00 $0.00 $1.50 $0.00 $248.75 $0.00 $1.50 $0.00 $3.00 $0.00 $284.75 $0.00 OCCUPATIONAL LICENSE Category Quantity 091000 RENTAL: SINGLE FAMILY/ DUPLEX 5 ACTIVITIES Date 1 Date 2 Date 3 Additional Requirements Needed 1 12/7/2000 see hold file - over paid need check for $27.50 - paid fee 12 -7 -00 Issue License - RENEWAL 12/7/2000 00/01 Renewal Notice 12/22/1998 12/22/1998 Renewal Notice new owner Issue License - RENEWAL Issue License - RENEWAL Issue License 12/22/1998 12/22/1998 1/25/1999 8/14/1999 9/29/1997 # Employees 0 Done Disp By DONE BLS DONE BLS DONE BLS DONE BLS DONE BLS DONE GBD DONE JVS r: \Forms\ I nfoS u m m a ry. rpt O" r'L90-3,7891 326 CORONADO DR Issue License - RENEWAL 01 -02 Renewal Notice 7/97 BATCH Renewal Notice 7/98 BATCH Renewal Notice 7/99 BATCH Renewal Notice 7/00 BATCH Renewal Notice 7/01 BATCH Renewal Notice FY 02/03 BATCH Issue License - RENEWAL 2002 -2003 Renewal Notice 03/04 Issue License - RENEWAL 2003 -2004 Renewal Notice 04/05 Issue License - RENEWAL 2004 -2005 Renewal Notice FY2005 -2006 Second Renewal Notice 2005 -2006 Issue License - RENEWAL 2005 -2006 Renewal Notice 2006-2007 ISSUE - Business Tax Renewal 2006 -2007 7/25/1997 7/28/1998 7/21/1999 7/18/2000 7/25/2001 7/27/2002 8/20/2001 DONE RRP 8/22/2002 7/11/2003 9/12/2003 DONE 7/26/2004 10/1/2004 DONE 7/22/2005 10/13/2005 12/20/2005 DONE 7/21/2006 8/22/2006 DONE } r: \Forms \I nfoSu m mary. rpt � rwi)y. CASE SUMMARY OCL- 0018242 345 CORONADO DR � � 3 CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVE. CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 PHONE (727) 562 -4567 FAX (727) 562 -4576 LUCCA DEVELOPMENT LLC 3 RENTAL UNITS PEOPLE Role: Owner /Property Business Owner FEES BUSINESS TAX - RENEWAL LICENSE FEE - NEW LICENSE FEE - RENEWAL Total LUCCA DEVELOPMENT LLC 9011 S NATOMA AVE OAK LAWN, IL 60453 LUCCA DEVELOPMENT LLC 9011 S NATOMA AVE OAK LAWN, IL 60453 Assessed Amount Amount Paid $30.00 $30.00 $28.75 $28.75 $30.00 $30.00 $88.75 $88.75 OCCUPATIONAL LICENSE Category Quantity 091000 RENTAL: SINGLE FAMILY/ DUPLEX 3 PHONE: 708 - 430 -0905 FAX: No Fax PHONE: 708 - 430 -0905 FAX: No Fax Balance Due $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 # Employees 1 Done ACTIVITIES Date 1 Date 2 Date 3 Disp By Application received 4/29/2005 Janet McMahan Zoning Review 4/29/2005 4/29/2005 DONE Janet McMahan PROPERTY APPRAISER IS SHOWING 3 UNITS AND OWNER HAS WATER STATEMENTS WITH USAGE FOR TREE UNITS. Issue License - NEW 04/05 4/29/2005 DONE Janet McMahan Renewal Notice .7/22/2005 FY2005 -2006 Issue License - RENEWAL 9/3/2005 DONE 2005 -2006 Renewal Notice 7/21/2006 2006-2007 rAForms \I nfoSu m mary. rpt r; CL-W)182142 • 345 CORONADO DR ISSUE - Business Tax Renewal 8/23/2006 DONE 2006 -2007 r: \Forms \I nfoS u m mary. rpt CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING •�.:tEA�;;' 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVE. CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 PHONE (727) 562 -4567 FAX(727)562-4576 CASE SUMMARY OCL9028581 "350 HAMDEN DR TROPICANA MOTEL INCL 347,353 CORONADO Bus phone: (813) 442 -9540 11/27/2005- change of ownership from Tropicana Beach Resort Inc. dba same as owner to Lucca Development LLC (don't know their dba) jmc. PEOPLE Role: Business Owner TROPICANA BEACH RESORT INC PHONE: (727) 442 -9540 Business Owner FEES BUSINESS TAX - RENEWAL DECEMBER DELINQUENT 5 LICENSE FEE - RENEWAL NOVEMBER DELINQUENT 5 OCTOBER DELINQUENT 10 Total TROPICANA RESORT MOTELS INC 350 HAMDEN DR CLEARWATER, FL 33767 LUCCA DEVELOPMENT LLC 9011 S NATOMA AVE OAK LAWN, IL 60453 Assessed Amount $75.90 $3.79 $629.65 $3.80 $20.53 $733.67 FAX: No Fax PHONE: No Phone FAX: No Fax Amount Paid Balance Due $75.90 $0.00 $3.79 $0.00 $629.65 $0.00 $3.80 $0.00 $20.53 $0.00 $733.67 $0.00 OCCUPATIONAL LICENSE Category Quantity # Employees 091000 RENTAL: SINGLE FAMILY / DUPLEX 32 4 Done ACTIVITIES Date 1 Date 2 Date 3 Disp By Issue License - RENEWAL 10/22/1999 DONE BLS Issue License - RENEWAL 10/25/2000 DONE SLW Issue License - RENEWAL 9/26/2001 DONE WBS 01 -02 Issue License - RENEWAL 9/3/1998 DONE BLS Issue License 11/3/1997 DONE GBD rAForms \I nfoSummary.rpt iCUe6581 350 HAMDEN DR Issue License 11/3/1997 DONE GBD first license didn't print with a signature of Director of Central Permitting. Was told by KG to re -run it Renewal Notice 7/25/1997 7/97 BATCH Renewal Notice 7/28/1998 7/98 BATCH Renewal Notice 7/21/1999 7/99 BATCH Renewal Notice 7/18/2000 7/00 BATCH Renewal Notice 7/25/2001 7/01 BATCH Renewal Notice 7/27/2002 FY 02/03 BATCH Phone Call 9/5/2002 DONE WBS business name changed from Tropicana Resort Motels Inc to Tropicana Beach Resort Inc, name change only same owners, confirmed with DBPR, ds Issue License - RENEWAL 9/9/2002 DONE 2002 -2003 Renewal Notice 7/11/2003 03/04 Issue License - RENEWAL 8/15/2003 DONE 2003 -2004 Renewal Notice 7/26/2004 04/05 Issue License - RENEWAL 9/17/2004 DONE 2004 -2005 Renewal Notice 7/22/2005 FY2005 -2006 Second Renewal Notice 10/13/2005 2005 -2006 New Owners 11/22/2005 DONE Janet McMahan 11/27/2005- change of ownership from Tropicana Beach Resort Inc. dba same as owner to Lucca Development LLC (don't know their dba) jmc. Additional Requirements Needed 12/19/2005 DONE Janet McMahan 11/22/2005 -new owner - need completed application, state license, fee AND need to know if they are doing boat slip rental, if so ... need zoning approval. jmc Renewal Notice 11/22/2005 DONE Janet McMahan Issue License - RENEWAL 2005 -2006 Renewal Notice 2006-2007 ISSUE - Business Tax Renewal 2006 -2007 12/20/2005 DONE 7/21/2006 8/22/2006 DONE r:\Forms\lnfoSummary.rpt CITY OF CLEARWATER ,I,. PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVE. CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 PHONE (727) 562 -4567 FAX (727) 562 -4576 CASE SUMMARY OCL- 0009578 346 HAMDEN DR ALBATROSS MOTEL MOTEL 12 UNITS PEOPLE Role: Owner /Property Business Owner FEES LICENSE FEE - NEW JOGY CORP 346 HAMDEN DR CLEARWATER, FL 33767 US -EURO TRADE INC ALBATROSS MOTEL 346 HAMDEN DR CLEARWATER, FL 33767 Assessed Amount $38.35 Total $38.35 PHONE: No Phone FAX: No Fax PHONE: 727 - 442 -9420 FAX: No Fax Amount Paid Balance Due $0.00 $38.35 $0.00 $38.35 OCCUPATIONAL LICENSE Category Quantity 091000 RENTAL: SINGLE FAMILY / DUPLEX 12 ACTIVITIES Date 1 Date 2 Date 3 TCASE VOID 3/11/2002 USING ORIGINAL CASE OCL9003241 Health Inspection 3/8/2002 Ficticious Name Required NEED FIC NAME PAPERS FOR'ALBATROSS MOTEL' Zoning Review 3/8/2002 3/8/2002 3/8/2002 Traffic /Engineering 3/8/2002 NO CHANGE IN USE Application received 3/8/2002 # Employees 0 Done Disp By DONE RRP O V0.a Z DONE Jean Peeke DONE A_D DONE Jean Peeke Jean Peeke r: \Forms \InfoSummary. rpt ��� -- CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES Lam` MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVE. CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 PHONE (727) 562 -4567 FAX (727) 562 -4576 CASE SUMMARY OCL9003241 348 HAMDEN DR ALBATROSS MOTEL MOTEL 16 UNITS STATE LICENSE MOT6204366 PEOPLE Role: Business Owner Business Owner Business Owner FEES BUSINESS TAX - RENEWAL DECEMBER DELINQUENT 5 LICENSE FEE - RENEWAL NOVEMBER DELINQUENT 5 OCL Upgrade Fee OCTOBER DELINQUENT 10 TRANSFER FEE TRANSFER FEE - NEW Total US - EURO TRADE INC 346 HAMDEN DR CLEARWATER, FL 33767 MONIQUE DEBLOIS 348 HAMDEN DR CLEARWATER, FL 33767 -2451 US -EURO TRADE INC 346 HAMDEN DR CLEARWATER, FL 33767 Assessed Amount $45.30 $2.27 $350.85 $2.26 $1.60 $4.53 $7.45 $3.84 $418.10 OCCUPATIONAL LICENSE Category 091000 RENTAL: SINGLE FAMILY/ DUPLEX ACTIVITIES Date 1 Date 2 Additional Requirements Needed over paid returning check - 11 -6 -00 Issue License - RENEWAL Amount Paid $45.30 $2.27 $350.85 $2.26 $1.60 $4.53 $7.45 $3.84 $418.10 Quantity 16 Date 3 11/6/2000 11/14/2000 Issue License - RENEWAL 11/17/1998 PHONE: 727 - 442 -6420 FAX: No Fax PHONE: (727) 442 -9420 FAX: No Fax PHONE: 727 - 442 -9420 FAX: No Fax Balance Due $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 # Employees 2 Disp DONE DONE DONE r: 0 �L )� V CNI�.� Done By BLS BLS BLS Forms \I nfoSu m mary. rpt 0CL9003241 348 HAMDEN DR • • Inspection 11/17/199811/17 /199811/17/1998 DONE BLS at location - took check to location to have it signed by owner - Ficticious Name Required 3/18/2002 DONE Jean Peeke License Transferred 3/18/2002 DONE SLW Issue License - RENEWAL 9/20/2001 DONE RRP 01 -02 Issue License - RENEWAL 10/23/1999 DONE Kathleen Bedini Issue License - RENEWAL 10/23/1999 DONE Kathleen Bedini Issue License - NEW 1/8/1998 DONE Roberta Gluski License Transferred 1/8/1998 DONE Roberta Gluski CHANGE OF OWNERSHIP 1/7/98 RG Issue License 9/23/1997 DONE Janet McMahan Issue License - RENEWAL 1/8/1998 DONE MBW Renewal Notice 7/25/1997 7/97 BATCH Renewal Notice 7/28/1998 7/98 BATCH Renewal Notice 7/21/1999 7/99 BATCH Renewal Notice 7/18/2000 7/00 BATCH Renewal Notice 7/25/2001 7/01 BATCH - Health Inspection 3/18/2002 DONE Jean Peeke Health Inspection 3/18/2002 DONE Jean Peeke DUP ENTRY Renewal Notice 7/27/2002 FY 02/03 BATCH Issue License - RENEWAL 8/7/2002 DONE SLW 02 -03 Renewal Notice 7/11/2003 03/04 Issue License - RENEWAL 8/18/2003 DONE Kathleen Bedini 03/04 Renewal Notice 7/26/2004 04/05 Issue License - RENEWAL 8/12/2004 DONE Calvin Peterson 04/05 Additional Requirements Needed 5 /2/2005 DONE LRN CAME IN WITH CHANGE RECORD FORM FROM STATE OF FLORIDA STATING APPROVAL FOR 14 UNITS Issue License - RENEWAL 5/2/2005 DONE R_D Renewal Notice 7/22/2005 FY2005 -2006 Second Renewal Notice 10/13/2005 2005 -2006 Issue License - RENEWAL 12/23/2005 DONE 2005 -2006 r:\Forms\InfoSummary.rpt OCL9003241 348 HAMDEN DR Renewal Notice 2006-2007 ISSUE - Business Tax Renewal 2006 -2007 Business Closed 7/21/2006 8/23/2006 2/12/2007 DONE DONE JAC r:\Forms\1nfoSummary.rpt ��rflYls�r t 7`1 CASE SUMMARY OCL- 0022244 346 HAMDEN DR ff • CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVE. CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 PHONE (727) 562 -4567 FAX (727) 562 -4576 ALBATROSS MOTEL 16 UNITS STATE LICENSE MOT6204366 PEOPLE Role: Owner /Property Business Owner FEES TRANSFER FEE LUCCA DEVELOPMENT LLC 521 MANDALAY AVE # 1008 CLEARWATER, FL 33767 FIFTH SOUTH, LLC 325 S GULFVIEW BLVD CLEARWATER, FL 33767 Assessed Amount $4.87 Total $4.87 PHONE: No Phone FAX: No Fax PHONE: 727 - 461 -7695 FAX: No Fax Amount Paid Balance Due $0.00 $4.87 $0.00 $4.87 OCCUPATIONAL LICENSE Category Quantity 091000 RENTAL: SINGLE FAMILY / DUPLEX 16 ACTIVITIES Date 1 Date 2 Date 3 Application received 2/12/2007 Traffic /Engineering 2/12/2007 Zoning Review 2/12/2007 Proof of Corporation State License Verified 2/12/2007 2/12/2007 # Employees 2 Disp Done By JAC DONE JAC DONE JAC 5 Placed in Pending Folder 3/2/2007 3/2/2007 DONE JAC ALL OTHER APPLICATIONS FOR FIFTH SOUTH LLC ARE ATTACHED TO THE FILE FOR 401 CORONADO DRIVE - MANY LICENSE, THIS NEED TO BE APPROVED BY WAYNE WELLS PRIOR TO ISSUANCE r:\Forms \I nfoSummary.rpt VIP CITY CITY OF CLEARWATER i ,i PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES " q MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING F 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVE. CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 PHONE (727) 562 -4567 FAX (727) 562 -4576 CASE SUMMARY OCL9046871 406 HAMDEN DR BAY LAWN MOTEL APARTMENTS INC 15 UNITS OWNER LIVES IN 1, Lic: 07568, Bus phone: (813) 443 -4529 PEOPLE Role: Business Owner VINKO KARABAIC PHONE: No Phone 406 HAMDEN DR FAX: No Fax CLEARWATER, FL 33767 -2535 FEES Assessed Amount LICENSE FEE - RENEWAL $118.00 OCTOBER DELINQUENT 10 $3.98 Total $121.98 OCCUPATIONAL LICENSE Category 091000 RENTAL: SINGLE FAMILY/ DUPLEX ACTIVITIES Date 1 Date 2 Issue License Issue License - RENEWAL 1998 -1999 yr license Issue License - RENEWAL Business Closed Balance Due PER NEW BUSINESS OWNERS Renewal Notice 7/25/1997 7/97 BATCH $121.98 Renewal Notice 7/28/1998 7/98 BATCH Renewal Notice 7/21/1999 7/99 BATCH Renewal Notice 7/18/2000 7/00 BATCH Delinquent Renewal Notice 12/10/2000 12 /00 -DLQ Amount Paid Balance Due $118.00 $0.00 $3.98 $0.00 $121.98 $0.00 Quantity 14 Date 3 9/29/1997 9/30/1998 10/4/1999 2/26/2001 # Employees 0 Done Disp By DONE Roberta Gluski DONE Roberta Gluski DONE FR DONE Jean Peeke r:\Forms\1nfoSummary.rpt CL9646871 406 HAMDEN DR' r:\Forms\lnfoSummary.rpt $ r�flAl ri�r�'� 4�1NNTPix., CASE SUMMARY OCL- 0007452 406 HAMDEN DR BAY LAWN MOTEL 15 UNIT MOTEL PEOPLE Role: Owner /Property Business Owner FEES • i CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVE. CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 PHONE (727) 562 -4567 FAX (727) 562 -4576 LICENSE FEE - NEW LICENSE FEE - RENEWAL Total BAY LAWN MOTEL LLC 10809 US HIGHWAY 92 E TAMPA, FL 33610 SUZANNE E CHAMPLIN 406 HAMDEN DR CLEARWATER, FL 33767 Assessed Amount Amount Paid $43.00 $43.00 $177.25 $177.25 $220.25 $220.25 OCCUPATIONAL LICENSE Category Quantity 091000 RENTAL: SINGLE FAMILY/ DUPLEX 15 PHONE: No Phone FAX: No Fax PHONE: 727 - 443 -4529 FAX: No Fax Balance Due $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 # Employees 2 0 G13 Traffic /Engineering NO CHANGE IN USE Application received Zoning Review NO CHANGE IN USE Renewal Notice 7/01 BATCH 7/25/2001 2/26/2001 DONE Jean 'Peeke 2/26/2001 Jean Peeke 2/26/2001 DONE Jean Peeke r: \Forms \I nfoSummary.rpt Done ACTIVITIES Date 1 Date 2 Date 3 Disp By Issue License - RENEWAL 8/17/2001 DONE RRP 01 -02 Additional Requirements Needed 2/26/2001 DONE Jean Peeke NEED COPY OF INSPECTION FROM DIV OF HOTEL & REST OR DOCUMENTATION FROM DEPT OF BUS & PROFESSIONAL REGULATION. RECEIVED DBPR DOCUMENTATION 2/26/01 Issue License - NEW 2/26/2001 DONE SLW Traffic /Engineering NO CHANGE IN USE Application received Zoning Review NO CHANGE IN USE Renewal Notice 7/01 BATCH 7/25/2001 2/26/2001 DONE Jean 'Peeke 2/26/2001 Jean Peeke 2/26/2001 DONE Jean Peeke r: \Forms \I nfoSummary.rpt CC L -0 W 7452 406 HAMDEN DR 1 0 0 Renewal Notice 7/27/2002 FY 02/03 BATCH Issue License - RENEWAL 9/5/2002 2002 -2003 Renewal Notice 7/11/2003 03/04 Issue License - RENEWAL 8/8/2003 2003 -2004 Renewal Notice 7/26/2004 04/05 Issue License - RENEWAL 8/5/2004 04/05 Business Closed 5/18/2005 SOLD BUSINESS PER SUZANNE - ORIG LIC IN ADDR FILE DONE DONE DONE BLS DONE Calvin Peterson r: \Forms \I nfoSu m mary. rpt ►��'`' {-? CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING ' *0 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVE. CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 art, ti4 PHONE (727) 562 -4567 FAX (727) 562 -4576 CASE SUMMARY OCL- 0022238 406 HAMDEN DR BAY LAWN License Type: Motel License Number: MOT6203104 Expires: 02/01/2008 Number of units: 18 PEOPLE Role: Business Owner FIFTH SOUTH, LLC Owner /Property FEES 325 S GULFVIEW BLVD CLEARWATER, FL 33767 FIFTH SOUTH LLC 521 MANDALAY AVE # 1008 CLEARWATER, FL 33767 PHONE: 727 - 461 -7695 FAX: No Fax PHONE: No Phone FAX: No Fax Assessed Amount Amount Paid Balance Due BUSINESS TAX - NEW $52.10 $52.10 $0.00 Total $52.10 $52.10 $0.00 OCCUPATIONAL LICENSE Category Quantity 091000 RENTAL: SINGLE FAMILY/ DUPLEX 18 ACTIVITIES Date 1 Date 2 Date 3 Zoning Review 3/2/2007 3/2/2007 Application received 2/9/2007 Traffic /Engineering 2/9/2007 2/9/2007 State License Verified 2/9/2007 Business Tax - NEW 06/07 2/9/2007 06 -07 # Employees 2 Disp DONE DONE DONE DONE Is s '7 Done By JAC JAC Bennett Elbo JAC R_D r: \Forms \I nfoSummary.rpt J� k1 d$1�$r +�'« CITY OF CLEARWATER Q ;! PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING 100 SOUTH MYRTLE'AVE. CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 PHONE (727) 562 -4567 FAX (727) 562 -4576 CASE SUMMARY OCL9123341 401 CORONADO DR TAK A WAY DELI AND FOODMART 62 -02- 126822 -01, Lic: 05886, Bus phone: (813) 443 -0576 PEOPLE Role: Business Owner LOIS CLYMER 401 CORONADO DR CLEARWATER, FL 33767 -2506 FEES PHONE: (727) 443 -0576 FAX: No Fax Assessed Amount Amount Paid Balance Due LICENSE FEE - RENEWAL $288.00 $288.00 $0.00 OCTOBER DELINQUENT 10 $17.96 $17.96 $0.00 Total $305.96 $305.96 $0.00 OCCUPATIONAL LICENSE Category 070010 MERCHANT OR MERCHANDISING ACTIVITIES Date 1 Date 2 Issue License - RENEWAL Issue License - RENEWAL Issue License - RENEWAL Issue License Issue License - RENEWAL Renewal Notice 7/25/1997 7/97 BATCH Renewal Notice 7/28/1998 7/98 BATCH Renewal Notice 7/21/1999 7/99 BATCH Renewal Notice 7/18/2000 7/00 BATCH Quantity 500 Date 3 8/24/1998 10/13/2000 10/4/2001 10/2/1997 8/30/1999 # Employees 0 Disp DONE DONE DONE DONE DONE p oz -S )(3J0 izszl�-i Done By GBD TAW SLW TAW Janet McMahan r\Forms \InfoSummary.rpt OL91 341 401 CORONADO OR Renewal Notice 7/01 BATCH Renewal Notice FY 02/03 BATCH Issue License - RENEWAL 02 -03 Renewal Notice 03/04 Issue License - RENEWAL 0 0 7/25/2001 7/27/2002 Business Closed PER LOIS - SEE OCL9306451 10/17/2002 7/11/2003 10/22/2003 DONE SLW DONE SLW r: \Forms \I nfoSummary.rpt Zip, CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVE. CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 PHONE (727) 562 -4567 FAX (727) 562 -4576 CASE SUMMARY OCL9142261 401 CORONADO DR BACK STREET SEAFOOD & BURGERS NEW BUS. NAME 1/26/96, Bus phone: (813) 443 -0576 39 SEATS INSIDE & 10 OUT, Lic: 05887 PEOPLE Role: Business Owner LOIS CLYMER PHONE: (727) 443 -0576 401 CORONADO DR FAX: No Fax CLEARWATER, FL 33767 -2506 FEES Assessed Amount Amount Paid Balance Due LICENSE FEE - RENEWAL $913.00 $913.00 $0.00 OCTOBER DELINQUENT 10 $49.72 $49.72 $0.00 Total $962.72 $962.72 $0.00 OCCUPATIONAL LICENSE Category Quantity # Employees 093030 RESTAURANT 49 0 ACTIVITIES Date 1 Date 2 Date 3 Issue License - RENEWAL 8/24/1998 Issue License - RENEWAL 8/24/1998 GDEVERS LEFT .50 CENTS OFF OF LICENSE AND HAD TO CORRECT AND REPRINT! Issue License - RENEWAL 10/13/2000 Issue License 10/2/1997 Issue License - RENEWAL 10/4/2001 Police Final Approval Re cd 12/15/1998 Issue License - RENEWAL 8/30/1999 Issue License - RENEWAL Issue License - RENEWAL 8/30/1999 8/30/1999 Disp DONE DONE 06 ►1314 94.siu'lv rvl� "'S" Done By GBD GBD DONE TAW DONE TAW DONE SLW DONE Janet McMahan DONE Janet McMahan DONE Janet McMahan DONE Janet McMahan rAForms \InfoSummary. rpt CL9142261 401 CORONADO DR Renewal Notice 7/25/1997 7/97 BATCH Renewal Notice 7/28/1998 7/98 BATCH Renewal Notice 7/21/1999 7/99 BATCH Renewal Notice 7/18/2000 7/00 BATCH Renewal Notice 7/25/2001 7/01 BATCH Renewal Notice 7/27/2002 FY 02/03 BATCH Issue License - RENEWAL 02 -03 Renewal Notice 03/04 Issue License - RENEWAL Business Closed PER LOIS - SEE OCL9306451 10/17/2002 DONE SLW 7/11/2003 10/22/2003 DONE SLW 5/13/2004 DONE Calvin Peterson r: \Forms \I nfoSu m mary. rpt W� f #i��•+� CITY OF CLEARWATER QQ PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING t C► °s 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVE. CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756,�,a•�� PHONE (727) 562 -4567 FAX (727) 562 -4576 CASE SUMMARY ,OCL9306451 401 CORONADO DR BEACH BAY 401 PEOPLE Role: Business Owner FEES ADMINISTRATIVE FEE DECEMBER DELINQUENT 5 JANUARY DELINQUENT 5% LICENSE FEE - NEW LICENSE FEE RENEWAL NOVEMBER DELINQUENT 5 OCTOBER DELINQUENT 10 Total LOIS CLYMER PHONE: 727 - 443 -0576 401 CORONADO DR FAX: No Fax CLEARWATER, FL 33767 -2506 Assessed Amount $80.50 $2.01 . $2.00 $40.25 $266.00 $2.01 $19.79 $412.56 Amount Paid Balance Due $0.00 $80.50 $0.00 $2.01 $0.00 $2.00 $0.00 $40.25 $266.00 $0.00 $0.00 $2.01 $15.76 $4.03 $281.76 $130.80 OCCUPATIONAL LICENSE Category Quantity 070010 MERCHANT OR MERCHANDISING 0 ACTIVITIES Date 1 Date 2 Date 3 Issue License - RENEWAL 8/24/1998 Issue License - RENEWAL 10/13/2000 Issue License 10/2/1997 Issue License - RENEWAL 10/4/2001 Issue License - RENEWAL 8/30/1999 Renewal Notice 7/25/1997 7/25/1997 7/97 BATCH Renewal Notice 7/28/1998 7/28/1998 7/98 BATCH # Employees 0 Done Disp By DONE GBD DONE TAW DONE TAW DONE SLW DONE Janet McMahan r: \Forms \I nfoSummary.rpt a ., CL9396451 401 CORONADO f)R Renewal Notice 7/21/1999 7/21/1999 7/99 BATCH DONE WBS Renewal Notice . 7/18/2000 7/18/2000 7/00 BATCH Renewal Notice 7/25/2001 7/25/2001 7/01 BATCH Renewal Notice 7/27/2002 7/27/2002 FY 02/03 BATCH Issue License - RENEWAL 10/17/2002 02 -03 Renewal Notice 7/11/2003 .03/04 fssue License - RENEWAL 10/22/2003 Renewal Notice 7/26/2004 04/05 Second Renewal Notice 10/11/2004 04/05 Final Renewal Notice 12/10/2004 2004 -2005 Phone Call 3/14/2005 443 -0576, left voice message to return my call. Machine; "this is Lois Clymer' Phone Call 4/7/2005 443 -0576 left voice message to return my call Inspection 4/19/2005 4/14/2005 business closed B_ usiness Closed 4/19/2005 ,per site inspection 4/14/05 DONE SLW DONE SLW DONE WBS DONE WBS DONE WBS DONE WBS r:\Forms\1nfoSummary.rpt tr�_ CITY OF CLEARWATER R'�;i;_ PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES I ti MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVE. CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 PHONE (727) 562 -4567 FAX (727) 562 -4576 CASE SUMMARY OCL- 0015802 401 CORONADO DR BACK ST MOTEL 5 "UNIT MOTEL PEOPLE Role: Business Owner LOIS CLYMER BACK ST MOTEL 401 CORONADO DR CLEARWATER, FL 33767 -2506 FEES Assessed Amount Amount Paid $0.00 $0.00 Total $0.00 $0.00 OCCUPATIONAL LICENSE Category Quantity 091000 RENTAL: SINGLE FAMILY / DUPLEX 5 PHONE: (727) 443 -0576 FAX: No Fax Balance Due $0.00 $0.00 # Employees 0 ACTIVITIES Date 1 Date 2 Date 3 Application received 5/13/2004 application not in the DRT hold folder, whereabouts unknown :Zoning Review 5/13/2004 DENIED PER JVS - NEEDS FLEXIBLE STANDARD TO CHANGE BACK TO MOTEL Application Denied 3/14/2005 5/13/05 by zoning Disp (D W,"7'ju\�N 4�tt\ tea- F�-5 Done By Calvin Peterson DONE WBS r:\Forrns\1nfoSurnmary.rpt �- -� CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES ` MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVE. CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 PHONE (727) 562 -4567 FAX (727) 562 -4576 CASE SUMMARY OCL- 0022243 401 CORONADO DR BACK STREET MOTEL MOTEL 8 RENTAL UNITS - STATE LICENSE MOT6215626 PEOPLE Role: Owner /Property FIFTH SOUTH LLC PHONE: No Phone 401 CORONADO DR FAX: No Fax CLEARWATER, FL 33767 Business Owner FIFTH SOUTH, LLC PHONE: 727 - 461 -7695 325 S GULFVIEW BLVD FAX: No Fax CLEARWATER, FL 33767 FEES Assessed Amount Amount Paid Balance Due BUSINESS TAX - NEW $35.10 $0.00 $35.10 Total $35.10 $0.00 $35.10 OCCUPATIONAL LICENSE Category Quantity # Employees 091000 'RENTAL: SINGLE FAMILY/ DUPLEX 8 4 ACTIVITIES Date 1 Date 2 Date 3 Disp Application received 2/12/2007 Traffic /Engineering 2/12/2007 Zoning Review 2/12/2007 0 F12,, � C ' I J 8 .11.A W4-t� ? Done By JAC State License Verified 2/12/2007 DONE JAC Placed in Pending Folder 3/2/2007 DONE JAC ALL OTHER APPLICATIONS FOR FIFTH SOUTH LLC ARE ATTACHED TO THE FILE FOR 401 CORONADO DRIVE - MANY LICENSE, THIS NEED TO BE APPROVED BY WAYNE WELLS PRIOR TO ISSUANCE r:\Forms\1nfoSumrnary.rpt vGc.- - $ 4 -Os CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVE. CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 PHONE (727) 562 -4567 FAX (727) 562 -4576 CASE SUMMARY ,OCL9000231 405 CORONADO DR KEY LIME INN License Type: Apartment License Number: TAP6204075 Expires: 02/01/2008 PEOPLE Role: Business Owner DOMENIC GAMMARACCIO 'Business Owner Business Owner FEES BUSINESS TAX - RENEWAL LICENSE FEE - RENEWAL NOVEMBER DELINQUENT 5 OCTOBER DELINQUENT 10 TRANSFER FEE TRANSFER FEE - NEW Total 405 CORONADO DR CLEARWATER, FL 33767 AMP BELLING INC 405 CORONADO DR CLEARWATER, FL 33767 -2506 FIFTH SOUTH, LLC 325 S GULFVIEW BLVD CLEARWATER, FL 33767 Assessed Amount $31.70 $262.85 $1.45 $9.12 $3.51 $3.00 $311.63 PHONE: (727) 441 -2154 FAX: No Fax PHONE: 727 - 441 -2154 FAX: No Fax PHONE: 727 - 461 -7695 FAX: No Fax Amount Paid Balance Due $31.70 $0.00 $262.85 $0.00 $1.45 $0.00 $9.12 $0.00 $0.00 $3.51 $3.00 $0.00 $308.12 $3.51 OCCUPATIONAL LICENSE Category Quantity 091000 RENTAL: SINGLE FAMILY/ DUPLEX .8 ACTIVITIES Date 1 Date 2 Date 3 Issue License - RENEWAL 8/5/1998 Issue License - RENEWAL 2/14/2000 Issue License - RENEWAL 11/26/2001 01 -02 License Transferred 2/23/2001 # Employees 2 Done Disp By DONE DAH DONE BLS DONE BLS DONE SLW r: \Forms \I nfoSummary. rpt C i�CL900023,1 • 405 CORONADO DR Issue License 9/23/1997 DONE MBW Issue License - RENEWAL 9/6/2000 DONE Kathleen Bedini Renewal Notice 7/25/1997 7/97 BATCH Renewal Notice 7/28/1998 7/98 BATCH Renewal Notice 7/21/1999 7/99 BATCH Delinquent Renewal Notice 1/5/2000 10/4/2002 DONE N_E 01 /00 -D LQ Renewal Notice 7/18/2000 7/00 BATCH Renewal Notice 7/25/2001 7/01 BATCH Renewal Notice 7/27/2002 FY 02/03 BATCH Issue License - RENEWAL 10/4/2002 DONE N_E 02 -03 Renewal Notice 7/11/2003 03/04 Issue License - RENEWAL 8/21/2003 DONE 2003 -2004 Renewal Notice 7/26/2004 04/05 Issue License - RENEWAL 9/10/2004 DONE 2004 -2005 Renewal Notice 7/22/2005 FY2005 -2006 Second Renewal Notice 10/13/2005 2005 -2006 Issue License - RENEWAL 11/23/2005 DONE 2005 -2006 Renewal Notice 7/21/2006 2006-2007 ISSUE - Business Tax Renewal 8/22/2006 DONE 2006 -2007 Proof of Corporation 2/9/2007 DONE JAC State License Verified 2/9/2007 DONE JAC Additional Requirements Needed HOLD JAC NEED COPY OF BILL OF SALE FOR NEW OWNER New Owners 2/9/2007 DONE JAC FIFTH SOUTH, LLC PRINCIPAL ADDRESS 880 MANDALAY UNIT C813 CLEARWATER BEACH FL 33767 US Placed in Pending Folder 3/2/2007 3/2/2007 DONE JAC ALL OTHER APPLICATIONS FOR FIFTH SOUTH LLC ARE ATTACHED TO THE FILE FOR 401 CORONADO DRIVE - MANY LICENSE, THIS NEED TO BE APPROVED BY WAYNE WELLS PRIOR TO ISSUANCE Zoning Review 3/2/2007 3/2/2007 Traffic /Engineering 3/2/2007 3/2/2007 r:\Forms\InfoSummary.rpt OCL9OO ,023;1 • • 405 CORONADO DR r:\Forms\lnfoSummary.rpt ��- -t CITY OF C L EA RWAT E R M PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING is �h 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVE. CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 PHONE (727) 562 -4567 FAX (727) 562 -4576 CASE SUMMARY OCL9027991 415 CORONADO DR FALCON MOTEL Bus phone: (727) 447 -8714, 22 Units - License Type: Motel License Number: MOT6204134 Expires: 02/01/2008 PEOPLE Role: Business Owner JZMC CORPORATION Business Owner FEES BUSINESS TAX - RENEWAL DECEMBER DELINQUENT 5 LICENSE FEE - RENEWAL NOVEMBER DELINQUENT 5 OCTOBER DELINQUENT 10 TRANSFER FEE Total OCCUPATIONAL LICENSE GREBS CORP 415 CORONADO DR CLEARWATER, FL 33767 -2506 FIFTH SOUTH, LLC 325 S GULFVIEW BLVD CLEARWATER, FL 33767 Assessed Amount $67.50 $3.38 $565.80 $3.38 $6.75 $20.25 $667.06 PHONE: (727) 447 -8714 FAX: N6 Fax PHONE: 727 - 461 -7695 FAX: No Fax Amount Paid Balance Due $67.50 $0.00 $3.38 $0.00 $565.80 $0.00 $3.38 $0.00 $6.75 $0.00 $6.07 $14.18 $652.88 $14.18 �qo_ Category Quantity # Employees 091000 RENTAL: SINGLE FAMILY / DUPLEX 22 2 110020 VENDING MACHINES: OPERATOR 1 2 Done ACTIVITIES Date 1 Date 2 Date 3 Disp By Issue License - RENEWAL 8/7/2000 DONE BLS Issue License _ RENEWAL 8/26/1999 DONE BLB Issue License - RENEWAL 8/24/1998 DONE Janet McMahan Issue License - RENEWAL 8/9/2001 DONE RRP 01 -02 rAForms \1 nfoSu mmary. rpt " OCL9327991 415 CORONADO DR • • Issue License 9/24/1997 DONE Janet McMahan Issue License 9/24/1997 DONE Janet McMahan ERROR Renewal Notice 7/25/1997 7/97 BATCH Renewal Notice 7/28/1998 7/98 BATCH Renewal Notice 7/21/1999 7/99 BATCH Renewal Notice 7/18/2000 7/00 BATCH Renewal Notice 7/25/2001 7/01 BATCH Renewal Notice 7/27/2002 FY 02/03 BATCH Issue License - RENEWAL 8/12/2002 DONE BLS 02 -03 Renewal Notice 7/11/2003 03/04 Issue License - RENEWAL 8/12/2003, DONE 2003 -2004 Renewal Notice 7/26/2004 04/05 Issue License - RENEWAL 8/12/2004 DONE 2004 -2005 Renewal Notice 7/22/2005 FY2005 -2006 Second Renewal Notice 10/13/2005 2005 -2006 Issue License - RENEWAL 12/23/2005 DONE 2005 -2006 Renewal Notice 7/21/2006 2006-2007 ISSUE - Business Tax Renewal 10/3/2006 DONE 2006 -2007 New Owners 2/9/2007 DONE JAC FIFTH SOUTH LLC FALCON MOTEL 9011 S NATOMA AVE OAK LAWN IL 60453 OUT OF STATE Proof of Corporation 2/9/2007 DONE JAC State License Verified 2/9/2007 DONE JAC Additional Requirements Needed HOLD JAC NEED BILL OF SALE UNSAFE CASE NEEDS TO BE ADDRESS PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF LICENSE (JAC) Placed in Pending Folder 3/2/2007 3/2/2007 DONE JAC ALL OTHER APPLICATIONS FOR FIFTH SOUTH LLC ARE ATTACHED TO THE FILE FOR 401 CORONADO DRIVE - MANY LICENSE, THIS NEED TO BE APPROVED BY WAYNE WELLS PRIOR TO ISSUANCE Zoning Review 3/2/2007 3/2/2007 Traffic /Engineering 3/2/2007 3/2/2007 r: \Forms \InfoSummary. rpt f'OCLS02799,1 415 CORONADO DR • • r:\Forms\lnfoSummary.rpt • i AV5 CITY OF CLEARWATER ^7 - PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVE. CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 PHONE (727) 562 -4567 FAX (727) 562 -4576 CASE SUMMARY OCL9026821 419 CORONADO DR GULF BEACH MOTEL 62 -02- 077169 -85, Lic: 03936, Bus phone: (813) 447 -3236 PEOPLE Role: Business Owner TIDSWELL INC WITTER CORP (THE) 419 CORONADO DR CLEARWATER, FL 33767 -2506 FEES Assessed Amount LICENSE FEE - RENEWAL $417.95 NOVEMBER DELINQUENT 5 $2.52 OCTOBER DELINQUENT 10 $13.95 Total $434.42 PHONE: (727) 447 -3236 FAX: No Fax Amount Paid Balance Due $367.55 $50.40 $0.00 $2.52 $8.91 $5.04 $376.46 $57.96 OCCUPATIONAL LICENSE Category Quantity 091000 RENTAL: SINGLE FAMILY/ DUPLEX 17 ACTIVITIES Date 1 Date 2 Date 3 Issue License - RENEWAL 10/26/1998 Issue License - RENEWAL 12/5/1997 Additional Requirements Needed 1/29/2000 10/6/99 paid 38.25, total renewal 44.25 Bal due 6.00 Issue License - RENEWAL 9/5/2001 01 -02 Issue License - RENEWAL 2/3/2000 Issue License - RENEWAL 11/1/2000 00/01 Issue License - RENEWAL 12/5/1997 Renewal Notice 7/97 BATCH 7/25/1997 # Employees 0 DONE WBS DONE WBS DONE Roberta Gluski r: \Forms \I nfoSummary.rpt Done Disp By DONE BLS DONE Roberta Gluski DONE WBS DONE RRP DONE WBS DONE WBS DONE Roberta Gluski r: \Forms \I nfoSummary.rpt OOL96i482,1 419 CORONADO DR v • Renewal Notice 7/28/1998 7/98 BATCH Renewal Notice 7/21/1999 7/99 BATCH Delinquent Renewal Notice 1/5/2000 11/1/2000 01 /00 -D LQ Renewal Notice 7/18/2000 7/00 BATCH Renewal Notice 7/25/2001 7/01 BATCH Renewal Notice 7/27/2002 FY 02/03 BATCH Issue License - RENEWAL 9/11/2002 2002 -2003 Renewal Notice 7/11/2003 03/04 Issue License - RENEWAL 9/5/2003 2003 -2004 Renewal Notice 7/26/2004 04/05 Issue License - RENEWAL 8/26/2004 2004 -2005 Renewal Notice 7/22/2005 FY2005 -2006 Second Renewal Notice 10/13/2005 2005 -2006 Business Closed 11/17/2005 11/17/2005 -site visit -Motel is closed. Site is being redeveloped (Aqualea) jmc. DONE WBS DONE DONE DONE DONE Janet McMahan r:\Forms\1nfoSummary.rpt CITY OF CLEARWATER +' z PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING .= EC`s,'►!' 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVE. CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 PHONE (727) 562 -4567 FAX (727) 562 -4576 CASE SUMMARY OCL- 0022239 419 CORONADO DR GULF BEACH MOTEL License Type: Motel License Number: MOT6202250 Expires: 02/01/2008 Units : 20 PEOPLE Role: Owner /Property FIFTH SOUTH LLC Business Owner FEES BUSINESS TAX - NEW OCCUPATIONAL LICENSE 521 MANDALAY AVE # 1008 CLEARWATER, FL 33767 FIFTH SOUTH, LLC 325 S GULFVIEW BLVD CLEARWATER, FL 33767 Assessed Amount $55.50 Total $55.50 PHONE: No Phone FAX: No Fax PHONE: 727 - 461 -7695 FAX: No Fax Amount Paid Balance Due $55.50 $0.00 $55.50 $0.00 Category Quantity 091000 RENTAL: SINGLE FAMILY / DUPLEX 20 ACTIVITIES Date 1 Date 2 Date 3 Zoning Review 2/9/2007 2/9/2007 2/9/2007 Application received 2/9/2007 Traffic /Engineering Proof of Corporation State License Verified Business Tax - NEW 06/07 06 -07 2/9/2007 2/9/2007 2/9/2007 2/9/2007 2/9/2007 # Employees 2 Disp DONE Zo - V'r Done By JAC JAC DONE Bennett Elbo DONE JAC DONE JAC DONE R_D rAForms \I nfoSu m ma ry. rpt I r CITY OF CLEARWATER NOTICE OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD PUBLIC HEARINGS The Community Development Board of the City of Clearwater, Florida, will hold public hearings on Tuesday, August 21, 2007, beginning at 1:00 p.m., in the City Council Chambers, in City. Hall, 3rd floor, 112 South Osceola Ave, Clearwater, Florida, to consider, the following requests: NOTE: All persons wishing to address an item need to be present at the BEGINNING of the meeting. Those cases that are not contested by the applicant, staff, neighboring property owners, etc. will be placed on a consent agenda and approved by a single vote at the beginning of the meeting. 1. (Cont'd from 07- 17 -07) Peter Pan Developments, LLC, Petrit Meroli, Panayiotis Vasiloudes, Epic Holdings South, LLC, and Somerset Place, Inc. (Sherry Bagley and/or Bill Woods, Woods Consulting) are requesting Flexible Development approval to construct a 4,062 sq ft multi -use dock facility to provide 16 slips as an amenity to a proposed 16 unit attached dwelling (2 buildings with 8 dwelling units in each) in the Tourist (T) District with an increase to the length of the southern dock from 75 percent of the lot width (93.75 ft) to 111 percent of the lot width (139 ft) under the provisions of Sec 3- 601.C.3. [Proposed Use: Multi -use dock of 4,062 sq ft for 16 slips, in conjunction with a 16 -unit attached dwelling (condominium)] at 685, 689, 693 and 699 Bay Esplanade Mandalay Unit No.5 Replat Blk 76 & 77, Lots 12 &13 & part of Lot 11. Assigned Planner: A. Scott Kurleman, Planner II. FLD2007 -03007 2. Lucca Development LLC (Clint Cuffle, Water Resource Associates, Inc) is requesting Flexible Development approval in the Tourist District to permit the addition of a Parking Garage and Lot of 377 spaces to Parcel "B" (located between Coronado Dr. and Hamden Dr., north of 5th St.) to a previously approved project of 102 attached dwelling units (FLD2005- 02021 /TDR2005- 03020 approved by the CDB on July 19, 2005), with reductions to the front (south along 5th St) setback from 15 ft to 4.4 ft (to screen wall) and to 5.5 ft (to pavement), a reduction to the front (east along Hamden Dr.) from 15 ft to 12.7 ft (to building) and an increase to building height from 35 ft to 51.35 ft (to top parking deck), as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Sec. 2- 803.C, with a reduction to required interior landscaping from 10 to 3.7 percent and a reduction to required foundation landscaping on the south side of the parking garage from 5 to 2 ft, as a Comprehensive Landscape Program, under the provisions of Sec. 3- 1202.G. (Proposed Use: Addition of a Parking Garage and Lot of 377 spaces to a previously approved attached dwelling project of 102 attached dwellings.) at 325 S. Gulfview Blvd., 326, 345, 347 & 353 Coronado Dr. and 350 Hamden Dr., Lloyd — White Skinner Sub Lots 63 — 66, • Lots 111 -117; Columbia Sub No. 2, Blk A, Lots 12 — 14; Columbia Sub No. 3, Lots 8, 9 & 9A • Lots 10 & 10A. Assigned Planner: Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Planner III. FLD2007 -06020 3. Grey Dolphin, LLC (Tom R. Chapman, Alberto F. Baraybar, The Villas of San Michelle) are requesting Flexible Development approval for 8 attached dwelling units within the Medium High Density Residential (MHDR) District / Island Estates Neighborhood Conservation Overlay District (IENCOD) with a reduction to the front (north) setback from 25 ft to 24 ft (to building) and 3.4 ft (to pavement), the rear (south) setback from 15 ft to zero ft (to pavement), the side (east) setback from 10 ft to 7.5 ft (to pavement), and side (west) setback from 10 ft to 5.5 ft (to pavement); and an increase in bldg ht from 50 ft to 66.66 ft as a Residential Infill Project pursuant to Sec. 2 -404.17 of the Community Development Code. (Proposed Use: Attached Dwellings) at 211 Dolphin Point, Island Estates of Clearwater Unit 5 -A Lots 10 & 11 together with subm land being part of water way adj to said lots. Assigned Planner: Robert G. Tefft, Planner III. FLD2007 -05016 4. FL. INT. IMP. Fund TRE. c/o Department of Natural Resources, Bureau of Public Land Administration (Leroy Chin, City of Clearwater) are requesting Flexible Development approval in the Institutional District for 4,800 sq ft of office and 14,054 sq ft of warehouse within 2 existing buildings and associated outside vehicle storage as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project pursuant to Sec. 2- 1204.A of the Community Development Code. (Proposed Use: Office /Warehouse) at 708 N. Missouri Avenue, Green Field Sub Lot 1. Assigned Planner: Robert G. Tefft, Planner IIl. FLD2007 -06019 Interested parties may appear and be heard at the hearing or file written notice of approval or objection with the Planning Director or City Clerk prior to the hearing. Any person who decides to appeal any decision made by the Board or Council, with respect to any matter considered at such hearings, will need to request a record of the proceedings and, for such purpose, may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based per Florida Statute 286.0105. Community Development Code Sec 4 -206 states that party status shall be granted by the Board in quasi-judicial cases if the person requesting such status demonstrates that s/he is substantially affected. Party status entitles parties to personally testify, present evidence, argument and witnesses, cross - examine witnesses, appeal the decision and speak on reconsideration requests, and needs to be requested and obtained during the case discussion before the CDB. An oath will be administered swearing in all persons giving testimony in quasi-judicial public hearing cases. If you wish to speak at the meeting, please wait to be recognized, then state and spell your name and provide your address. Persons without party status speaking before the CDB shall be limited to three minutes unless an individual is representing a group in which case the Chairperson may authorize a reasonable amount of time up to 10 minutes. Five days prior to the meeting, staff reports and recommendations on the above requests will be available for review by interested parties between the hours of 8:30 a.m. and 4:30 p.m., weekdays, at the City of Clearwater, Planning Department, 100 S. Myrtle Ave., Clearwater, FL 33756. Please contact the case presenter, at 562 -4567 to discuss any questions or concerns about the project and/or to better understand the proposal and review the site plan. Michael Delk Cynthia E. Goudeau, MMC Planning Director City Clerk City of Clearwater P.O. Box 4748, Clearwater, FL 33758 -4748 NOTE: Applicant or representative must be present at the hearing. A COPY OF THIS AD IN LARGE PRINT IS AVAILABLE IN OFFICIAL RECORDS AND LEGISLATIVE SERVICES. ANY PERSON WITH A DISABILITY REOUIRING REASONABLE ACCOMMODATION IN ORDER TO PARTICIPATE IN THIS MEETING SHOULD CALL (727) 562 -4093 WITH THEIR REQUEST. To learn more about presenting to Clearwater boards and City Council, go to http:// clearwater .granicus.comNiewPublisher.php ?view id =11 and click on "Resident Engagement Video." You can also check the informational video out from any Clearwater public library. Ad: 8/9/07 ALBANESE, JANICE M ALBANESE, JOSEPH M 52 RIDGEWAY WHITE PLAINS NY 10605 - 3708 BARONE, ANDREW A BARONE, ALAN 2421 HORATIO ST # 832 TAMPA FL 33609 - 3377 BASKIN, H H EST OWENS, W D EST 516 N FT HARRISON AVE CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3905 BEYNON, ROBERT L BEYNON, REBECCA 1900 ALLEGHENY BLDG PITTSBURGH PA 15219 - 1623 BOLDOG, CLARA BOLDOG, DOROTHY 2500 VIRGINIA AVE NW UNIT 1405 WASHINGTON DC 20037 - 1901 BRENNAN, KEVIN P 130 BRIGHTWATER DR CLEARWATER FL 33767 - BUKACEK, MARTA M 14086 JENNIFER TER LARGO FL 33774 - 5105 CANNEY, SCOTT W 314 WESTERN AVE ALLEGAN MI 49010 - 1241 CAVANAUGH, MICHAEL C 300 S SCHMALE CAROL STREAM IL 60188 - 2702 *MERICANA GULF MOTELS LTD PTR qWRTHUR, DAVID W 325 S GULFVIEW BLVD ARTHUR, JEAN E CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2445 1000 KELVIN CT WORTHINGTON OH 43085 - 2919 BARONE, ANDREW A BARONE, ALAN 5206 STATE ROUTE 256 BALTIMORE OH 43105 - 9446 BEDROCK ENTERPRISES LLC 4510 OLD AIRPORT WAY FAIRBANKS AK 99709 - 4615 BISHAY, ADEL A BISHAY, SAWSAN G 6156 NEW OSPREY POINT SPRING HILL FL 34607 - 4040 BOLDOG, DOROTHY C THE 6033 CRIMSON CT MCLEAN VA 22101 - 1818 BROWN, STEPHANIE L 1702 HUNTINGTON CT SAFETY HARBOR FL 34695 - 5635 BUKOWSKI, WLADYSLAW BUKOWSKI, KRYSTYNA 345 HAMDEN DR CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2450 CANTERBURY OAKS INC 401 S GULFVIEW BLVD CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2508 CHRISTMAN, KENNETH R SR CHRISTMAN, LINDA J 225 CORONADO DR CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2431 BARROWS, SCOTT O BARROWS, JUDY L 130 BAYSIDE DR CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2501 BELLE AQUA VILLAS LLC PO BOX 4189 CLEARWATER FL 33758 - 4189 BLAYLOCK, MICHAEL D BLAYLOCK, REBECCA D 470 3RD ST S # 912 ST PETERSBURG FL 33701 - 4647 BOLDOG, DOROTHY C THE M & J TRUST PO BOX 8589 CLEARWATER FL 33758 - 8589 BUCHELE, NIKOLAUS BUCHELE, MARYANNE 13360 VERONA TUSTIN CA 92782 - 9140 C B C I DEV GROUP LLC 475 CENTRAL AVE STE 202 ST PETERSBURG FL 33701 - 3859 CANTERBURY PROPERTY MANAGEMENT T L S HOLDINGS INC 421 GULFVIEW BLVD CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2508 CORRY, PATRICK E CORRY, KELLY J 599 HAWTHORNE ELMHURST IL 60126 - 4240 CRAIG, NEVIN J CRYSTAL BEACH CAPITAL LLC CURTIN, ROBERT C 103 MEADOW LN 101 E KENNEDY BLVD STE 2125 CURTIN, SARAH S CLAIRTON PA 15025 - 3376 TAMPA FL 33602 - 5189 8112 QUINN TER VIENNA VA 22180 - 7452 s • 0 CZAICKI, EDWARD D'AMICO, LOUIS J CZAICKI, BOZENA 410 HAMDEN DR 332 HAMDEN DR CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2535 CLEARWATR BEACH FL 33767 - 2448 DIFERDINANDO, RITA H ENTRUST OF TAMPA BAY LLC 9220 RUMSEY RD # 101 451 CENTRAL PARK DR COLUMBIA MD 21045 - 1956 LARGO FL 33771 - 2143 FELDMAN, MARVIN J FELDMAN, LINDA 123 BAYSIDE DR CLEARWATER FL 33767 FERGUSON, MARK A FERGUSON,SHERRY 7937 9TH AVE S -2502 ST PETERSBURG FL 33707 - 2732 FIFTH SOUTH LLC 521 MANDALAY AVE # 1008 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1795 GEMMA, FRANK L GEMMA, LAURA A 14 HARBOR WOODS DR SAFETY HARBOR FL 34695 - 5316 GIOVANNI, ROBERT KOZIK, CHRISTIAN 317 CORONADO DR # B CLEARWATER BEACH FL 33767 - 2433 GROSS, ALBERT JAY GROSS, DEBRA H 2215 MUIRFIELD WAY OLDSMAR FL 34677 - 1942 HENDRIX, RICK L HENDRIX, CONNIE L 6745 STATE RD WADSWORTH OH 44281 - 9727 HUSSEY, JEFFREY S 8120 BRINEGAR CIR TAMPA FL 33647 - 1 768 FOULOIS, WILLIAM B FOULOIS, MARA E 10910 BELMONT BLVD MASON NECK VA 22079 - 3823 GIADLA, WERONIKA GIADLA, ALOJZY 355 S GULFVIEW BLVD CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2445 GONTARZ, ALBERT J HASTINGS, SCOTT 396 MAIN ST # 8 YALESVILLE CT 06492 - 6211 GROSS, GARY A GROSS, LINDA L 1905 BUNBURY CT THOMPSONS STN TN 37179 - 9703 HIGHLANDER ROCK INC 415 HAMDEN DR CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2537 J M B & A DEVELOPERS LLC 1947 PETERS PL CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 7597 DI VELLO LAND TRUST DI VELLO, FULVIO THE 400 ISLAND WAY # 703 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2134 FARRELL, JOSEPH L FARRELL, MARY E 9058 WOOD VIEW DR PITTSBURGH PA 15237 - 4108 FIFTH SOUTH LLC 401 CORONADO DR CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2506 FREEDMAN, KERRY R 703 SHADY LANE AVE CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 6258 GIBSON, EVELYN L 1206 MELVIEW CT ST LOUIS MO 63125 - 4614 GOOSEN, EDWIN P GOOSEN, ODESSA L 130 BRIGHTWATER DR # 4 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2401 HECKROW, CINDY 603 RUSKIN RD CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 2336 HUBER, DAN T 1211 HUNTINGTON LN SAFETY HARBOR FL 34695 - 5608 JZMCCORP 415 CORONADO DR CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2506 KALLAS, DORA KELLY, MARK E KELLY, MARK KALLAS, GEORGE KELLY, ELMETTA KELLY, ELMETTA 3405 GULF BLVD 1617 WESTERLY'DR 445 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 226 BELLEAIR BCH FL 33786 - 3644 BRANDON FL 33511 -1821 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2508 KENIG, EDWARD KENIG, STANISLAWA 433 CORONADO DR CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2506 KRONZER, FRANK J KRONZER, SHARON L 1025 AVERY CREEK DR WOODSTOCK GA 30188 - 2313 LUCCA DEVELOPMENT LLC 521 MANDALAY AVE # 1008 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1 795 MARKS, IRWIN J MARKS, DAWN D 115 BRIGHTWATER DR CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2402 MECAS LLC 1628 SYLVIA DR ENDICOTT NY 13760 - 7145 MORGAN, GEORGE W 122 BAYSIDE DR CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2501 O'CONNOR, DANIEL O'CONNOR, DEBORAH L 17796 WALL CIR REDINGTON SHORES FL 33708 - 1248 PALMTOPPER CONDO ASSN INC 110 BRIGHTWATER DR # 4 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2401 PERLIN, MICHAEL PERLIN, JODI 1970 PROMENADE WAY CLEARWATER FL 33760 - 1734 0 i KIBLER, ROBERT F III KIBLER, DARLENE R 803 BAY POINT DR MADEIRA BEACH FL 33708 - 2316 L O M INC 4100 N 28TH TERR HOLLYWOOD FL 33020 - 1116 'MALKE, ROBERT E MALKE, TERESA L PO BOX 2124 LARGO FL 33779 - 2124 MAZZON, MAURIZIO 110 BAYSIDE DR CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2501 MITCHELL, THOMAS E 5000 GULF BLVD # 102 ST PETE BEACH FL 33706 - 2401 MOROCCO, JAMES R MOROCCO, PATRICIA 2620 WOOD POINTE DR HOLIDAY FL 34691 - 8722 KOVACH, THOMAS J KOVACH, CONNIE L 15849 REDINGTON DR REDINGTON BEACH FL 33708 - 1743 LITTLE, DAVID R 1734 CASEY JONES CT CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 1 701 MAMALAKIS, JOHN S MAMALAKIS, THERESE K 7850 W 96TH ST BLOOMINGTON MN 55438 - 2913 MC GOVERN, JASON L MC GOVERN, KATHERINE G 2620 SWEET BROOM LN NAPERVILLE IL 60564 - 4325 MITCHELL, THOMAS E 5960 S GARICA RD HOMOSSASSA FL 34448 - 4316 NICKELS, JOHN H NICKELS, MARY ELLEN 426 LOWELL DR HIGHLAND HEIGHTS OH 44143 - 3616 O'DONNELL, GERARD OLSSON, WILLIAM H O'DONNELL, JACKIE OLSSON, LYNNE A 3 PACKHORSE LN 15913 DOVER CLIFFE DR WYHALL BIRINGHAM B47 5DH 00009 LUTZ FL 33548 - 6197 - UNITED KINGDOM PARSONS, GARY C DOUGLAS, MARY E TRUST 6445 MEADOWBROOK CIR WORTHINGTON OH 43085 - 2864 PITZULO, SAMUEL J PITZULO, JANET M 440 JANET DR CANFIELD OH 44406 - 1532 PELICAN POINTE ON CLEARWATER B 445 S GULFVIEW BLVD CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2508 PRATO, EDWARD DIERSCH, RAYMOND 74LOISCTE EAST MEADOW NY 11554 - 1412 PRESTON, MICHAEL G THE R T V PROPERTIES INC REK, WILLIAM J 419 EASTSHORE DR PO BOX 3835 REK, LISA A CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2028 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 8835 6240 70TH AVE PINELLAS PARK FL 33781 - 4169 0 ROGERS, ROLAND ROSENSTEEL, DANIEL S SAYROO, MICHAEL 321 CORONADO DR 17082 DOLPHIN DR PO BOX 15736 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2433 N REDNGTN BCH FL 33708 - 1324 TAMPA FL 33684 - 5736 SCHAFFER, GEORGE A 675 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 406 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2657 SIRABELLA, LOUIS SIRABELLA, JEANETTE C 750 ISLAND WAY # 501 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1821 SUN WEST PALMS DEV LLC 100 BAYSIDE DR CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2501 SZLECHTA, WLODZIMIERZ KUNOWSKA, EWA 333 CORONADO DR CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2433 TIRUPATHI, PANEENDRA FAMILY TR 8186 ELISABETH LN LARGO FL 33777 - 1352 UHLMAN, JAMES P UHLMAN, SUSAN C 2399 COLLINS DR WORTHINGTON OH 43085 - 2808 WAZIO, EUGENIUSZ F WAZIO, IRENA 110 BRIGHTWATER DR # 4 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2401 WOLAK, CARRIE A 42 EVERGREENE WALLINGFORD CT 06492 - 2975 CLEARWATER NEIGHBORHOODS COALITION JOE EVICH, PRESIDENT P.O. BOX 8204 CLEARWATER, FL 33758 SHAH, MANNA J 2221 NORWEGIAN DR # 33 CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 2961 SOFRONAS, JAMES SOFRONAS, CHRISTINE 431 GULFVIEW BLVD CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2508 SUNRISE ON THE BEACH INC 229 CORONADO DR CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2431 TAS, JERRY TAS,TERESA 342 HAMDEN DR CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2451 TIRUPATHI, SIRISH K TIRUPATI, SRIVANI 2133 GLENCOE HILLS DR # 6 ANN ARBOR MI 48108 - 1043 VASILAROS, JACK VASILAROS, SOPHIA 119 BAYSIDE DR CLEARWATER FL 33767 SIMON, RICHARD A 1474 S PAIRIE AVE #D CHICAGO IL 60605 - 2884 SPRING TIDE INVESTMENTS IV LLC 622 BYPASS RD # 100 CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 5002 SYKES, WILLIAM E SYKES, HELEN N 421 HAMDEN DR CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2537 TIDSWELL INC 419 CORONADO DR CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2506 TROPICAL BREEZE OF CLEARWATER 163 BAYSIDE DR CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2502 VASILAROS, SOPHIA VASILAROS, JACK 111 BAYSIDE DR -2502 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2502 WEGLARZ, RUSSELL J WEGLARZ, LAURIE A 13410 WOOD DUCK DR PLAINFIELD IL 60585 - 7766 ZIMMERMANN, GUNDER 12912 CASTLEMAINE DR TAMPA FL 33626 - 4470 WILK, THOMAS J WILK, STASIA 451 HARBOR DR S INDIAN ROCKS BEACH FL 33785 - 3118 CLEARWATER BEACH ASSOCIATION JAY KEYES 100 DEVON DRIVE CLEARWATER, FL 33767 PLANNING DEPARTMENT ITY OF CLEAR ATER POST OFFICE BOX 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758 -4748 MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562 -4567 FAx (727) 562 -4865 August 21, 2007 Clint Cuffle Water Resource Associates, Inc. 4260 West Linbaugh Avenue Tampa, FL 33624 RE: Development Order - Case FLD2007 -06020 325 South Gulfview Boulevard, 326, 345, 347 and 353 Coronado Drive and 350 Hamden Drive Dear Mr. Cuffle: This letter constitutes a Development Order pursuant to Section 4- 206.D.6 of the Community Development Code. On August 21, 2007, the Community Development Board reviewed your request for Flexible Development approval in the Tourist District to permit the addition of a Parking Garage and Lot of 377 spaces to Parcel "B" (located between Coronado Drive and Hamden Drive, north of 5th Street) to a previously approved project of 102 attached dwelling units (FLD2005- 02021 /TDR2005 -03020 approved by the CDB on July 19, 2005), with reductions to the front (south along 5th Street) setback from 15 f6et to 4.4 feet (to screen wall) and to 5.5 feet (to pavement), a reduction to the front (east along Hamden Drive) from 15 feet to 12.7 feet (to building) and an increase to building height from 35 feet to 51.35 feet (to top parking deck), as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2- 803.C, with a reduction to required foundation landscaping on the south side of the parking garage from five to two feet, as a Comprehensive Landscape Program, under the provisions of Section 3- 1202.G. The Community Development Board (CDB) APPROVED the application with the following Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and Conditions of Approval: Findings of Fact: 1. The 2.37 total acres is generally located between S. Gulfview Blvd. and Coronado Dr. west of Brightwater Blvd. (Parcel A), between Coronado Dr. & Hamden Dr. north of 5th St. (Parcel B) and east of Hamden Dr. north of 5th St. (Parcel C); 2. On July 19, 2005, the Community Development Board (CDB) approved with 15 conditions Case Nos. FLD2005- 02021 /TDR2005 -03020 to permit a total of 102 attached dwellings, with 92 dwelling units in a 148 -foot tall building on Parcel A and 10 dwelling units in a 64 -foot tall building on Parcel B, which included the Termination of Status of Nonconformity (equivalent of 119 hotel units [ 116 hotel units and three dwelling units] where 93 hotel units are permitted), the conversion of these hotel units to residential units and the Transfer of Development Rights of 18 hotel units from 401 Coronado Drive and 406 Hamden Drive (donor sites); FRANK HIBBARD, MAYOR JOHN DORAN, COUNCILMEMBER J.B. JOHNSON, COUNCILMEMBER BILL JONSON, COUNCILMEMBER CAREEN A. PETERSEN, COUNCILMEMBER "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER" 1 August 21, 2007 Cuffle — Page 2 3. On August 13, 2007, the Planning Director approved with 13 conditions a Minor Revision, under the provisions of Section 4- 406.A, relocating the 10 dwelling units approved on Parcel B to Parcel A, so that Parcel A will have all 102 dwelling units approved under the original application,. and Parcel B will only have accessory parking located on it (the balance between the 187 parking spaces provided on Parcel A and that necessary to provide overall required parking for the 102 dwelling units at a rate of two parking spaces per unit [total of 204 spaces]); 4. The proposal is to add the use of Parking Garage and Lot for 377 spaces to Parcel B (located between Coronado Drive and Hamden Drive, north of 5th Street) to a previously approved project of 102 attached dwelling units (FLD2005- 02021 /TDR2005- 03020); 5. Parcel B will provide 17 parking spaces for the attached dwellings on Parcel A; 6. Of the 377 parking spaces being provided on Parcel B, 300 parking spaces are intended to be sold to the City for public parking. Of the remaining 77 parking spaces, 50 spaces will be at ground level and 27 spaces will be on the 6"' floor, all for use by the developer /owner; 7. The proposal includes reductions to the front (south along 5th Street) setback from 15 feet to 4.4 feet (to screen wall) and to 5.5 feet (to pavement) and a reduction to the front (east along Hamden Drive) from 15 feet to 12.7 feet (to building); 8. Proposed setbacks are consistent with existing setbacks for other projects in close proximity within this urban context; 9. The proposed parking garage building has been designed at a height of 51.35 feet to the highest garage floor from Base Flood Elevation (BFE); 10. The accessory parking garage and attached dwellings originally approved on this Parcel B under FLD2005- 02021 /TDR2005 -03020 was to be at a height of 64 feet; 11. The proposed parking garage building height is consistent with the Code and with other projects approved (but yet to be constructed), under construction or already constructed within the surrounding area; 12. Unless the architect can provide documentation at the building permit stage that the stair /elevator towers must exceed the maximum height of 16 feet to the 20 feet proposed, these two towers should be required to be reduced to the maximum height of 16 feet; 13. These overhead utility lines running through the middle of Parcel B will need to be removed to provide for the construction of the parking garage. The overhead lines along the east half of Parcel B on the north side of 5h Street will also need to be placed underground as part of the construction of this parking garage; 14. While the request has been advertised with a reduction to required interior landscaping from 10 to 3.7 percent, recalculation of the provided interior landscape area indicates 16.7 percent of the vehicular use area; 15. The proposal includes a reduction to required foundation landscaping on the south side of the parking garage from five to two feet, where the two -foot dimension is at the column locations only. The foundation landscape width otherwise is four feet. Proposed site landscaping justifies the requested reduction to the foundation landscape width; and 16. There are current Code Enforcement cases at 325 South Gulfview Boulevard and at 326 Coronado Drive. Conclusions of Law: 1. That the development proposal is consistent with the Standards as per Tables 2 -801.1 and 2 -802 of the Community Development Code; 2. That the development proposal is consistent with the Flexibility criteria as per Section 2 -803.0 of the Community Development Code; August 21, 2007 Cuffle — Page 3 3. That the development proposal is consistent with the General Standards for Level_ Two Approvals as per Section 3 -913 of the Community Development Code; and 4. That the development proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Landscape Program criteria as per Section 3- 1202.G of the Community Development Code. Conditions of Approval: 1. That approval of this Flexible Development case is subject to the approval of a Development Agreement with the City; 2. That all prior conditions of approval under FLD2005 -02021 by the CDB and under the Minor Revision are still applicable, except as modified through this application approval; 3. That the final design and color of the parking garage building be consistent with the conceptual elevations submitted to, or as modified by, the CDB; 4. That, unless the architect can provide documentation at the building permit stage that the stair /elevator towers must exceed the maximum height of 16 feet to the 20 feet proposed, these two towers be reduced to the maximum height of 16 feet prior to the issuance of the building permit; 5. That a Declaration of Unity of Title (for condominiums) for Parcels A, B and C be recorded in the public records prior to the issuance of any permits; 6. That a condominium plat be recorded prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy; 7. That all utility equipment, including but not limited to wireless communication facilities, electrical and gas meters, etc., be screened from view and/or painted to match the building to which they are attached, as applicable, prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy; 8. That existing overhead utility lines running north/south through Parcel B and along the east half of Parcel B on the north side of 5`b Street be placed underground prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy for the parking garage; 9. That any air conditioning unit for the small office on the ground floor be wall mounted and not placed on the outside wall of the parking garage building; 10. That freestanding and attached signage for the parking garage meet the requirements of the Code and any freestanding sign be monument - style, designed to match the exterior materials and color of the parking garage building; 11. That, prior to the issuance of any permit, compliance with all requirements of Stormwater Engineering be met; 12. That all Fire Department requirements be met prior to the issuance of any permits; 13. That any applicable Public Art and Design Impact Fee be paid prior to the issuance of any permits; and 14. That all Parks and Recreation fees be paid prior to the issuance of any permits. Pursuant to Section 4-407, an application for a building permit or other approvals shall be made within one year of Flexible Development approval (August 21, 2008). All required certificates of occupancy shall be obtained within two years of the date of issuance of the building permit. Time frames do not change with successive owners. The Community Development Coordinator may grant an extension of time for a period not to exceed one year and only within the original period of validity. The Community Development Board may approve one additional extension of time after the community development coordinator's extension to initiate a building permit application. �k io- 4 +� 6J � August 21, 2007 Cuffle — Page 4 The issuance of this Development Order does not relieve you of the necessity to obtain any building permits or pay any impact fees that may be required. In order to facilitate the issuance of any permit or license affected by this approval, please bring a copy of this letter with you when applying for any permits or licenses that require this prior development approval. Additionally, an appeal of a Level Two approval (Flexible Development) may be initiated pursuant to Section 4 -502.13 by the applicant or by any person granted party status within 14 days of the date of the CDB meeting. The filing of an application/notice of appeal shall stay the effect of the decision pending the final determination of the case. The appeal period for your case expires on September 4, 2007 (14 days from the date of the CDB meeting). If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call Wayne M. Wells, Planner III, at 727 -562 -4504. You can access zoning information for parcels within the City through our website: www.myclearwater.com/ og v /depts /planning. Sincerely, Mic ael elk, P Planning Director S: (Planning DepartmentlC D BIFLEX (FLD)Ilnactive or Finished Applications lGulfviewS 0325 Marbella (7) 1007 - ApprovedIGulfview S325 Development Order 8.21.07.doc b CD CD 0 0 �I C) 0 9, ta tw CN G a U 0 U 6 0 U .a a 'z A ;E re N N 0 0 N A 0 a GENERAL CONSTRUCTION NOTES: 1. ALL ELEVATIONS REFER TO THE NATIONAL GEODETIC VERTICAL DATUM (1929). 2. LOCATIONS, ELEVATIONS, AND DIMENSIONS -OF EXISTING UTILITIES, STRUCTURES, AND OTHER FEATURES ARE SHOWN ACCORDING TO THE BEST INFORMATION AVAILABLE AT THE TIME OF PREPARATION OF THESE PLANS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY THE LOCATIONS, ELEVATIONS, AND DIMENSIONS OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES, STRUCTURES AND OTHER FEATURES AFFECTING THIS WORK PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. 3. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CHECK PLANS FOR CONFLICTS AND DISCREPANCIES PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE OWNER'S ENGINEER OF ANY CONFLICT BEFORE PERFORMING ANY WORK IN THE AFFECTED AREA. 4. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL EXERCISE EXTREME CAUTION IN AREAS OF BURIED UTILITIES AND SHALL PROVIDE AT LEAST 48 HOURS NOTICE TO THE VARIOUS UTILITY COMPANIES IN ORDER TO PERMIT MARKING THE LOCATIONS OF EXISTING UNDERGROUND UTILITIES IN ADVANCE OF CONSTRUCTION, BY CALLING FLORIDA SUNSHINE STATE ONE CALL CENTER OF FLORIDA, INC. AT 1- 800 - 432 -4770. 5. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR REPAIRING ANY DAMAGE TO EXISTING FACILITIES, ABOVE OR BELOW GROUND, THAT MAY OCCUR AS A RESULT OF THE WORK PERFORMED BY THE CONTRACTOR. 6. ALL UNDERGROUND UTILITIES MUST BE IN PLACE AND TESTED OR INSPECTED PRIOR TO ROADWAY BASE AND SURFACE CONSTRUCTION. 7. IT IS THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO BECOME FAMILIAR WITH THE PERMIT AND INSPECTION REQUIREMENTS OF THE VARIOUS GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN ALL NECESSARY PERMITS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION, AND SCHEDULE INSPECTIONS ACCORDING TO AGENCY INSTRUCTION. 8. ALL SPECIFICATIONS AND DOCUMENTS REFERRED TO SHALL BE OF LATEST REVISIONS AND /OR LATEST EDITION. 9. ALL WORK PERFORMED SHALL COMPLY WITH THE REGULATIONS AND ORDINANCES OF THE VARIOUS GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES HAVING JURISDICTION OVER THE WORK. 10. CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT FOR APPROVAL TO THE OWNER'S ENGINEER SHOP DRAWINGS ON ALL PRECAST AND MANUFACTURED ITEMS. FAILURE TO OBTAIN APPROVAL BEFORE INSTALLATION MAY RESULT IN REMOVAL AND REPLACEMENT AT CONTRACTOR'S EXPENSE. 11. AT LEAST 3 WORKING DAYS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE ENGINEER AND APPROPRIATE AGENCIES AND SUPPLY THEM WITH ALL APPROVED SHOP DRAWINGS, THE CONTRACTOR'S NAME, STARTING DATE, PROJECTED SCHEDULE, AND OTHER INFORMATION AS REQUIRED. ANY WORK PERFORMED PRIOR TO NOTIFYING THE ENGINEER OR WITHOUT AGENCY INSPECTOR PRESENT MAY BE SUBJECT TO REMOVAL AND REPLACEMENT AT THE CONTRACTOR'S EXPENSE. 12. WORK PERFORMED UNDER THIS CONTRACT SHALL INTERFACE SMOOTHLY WITH OTHER WORK BEING PERFORMED ON SITE BY OTHER CONTRACTORS AND UTILITY COMPANIES. IT WILL BE NECESSARY FOR THE CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE AND SCHEDULE HIS ACTIVITIES, WHERE NECESSARY WITH OTHER CONTRACTOR AND UTILITY COMPANIES. 13. ALL DISTURBED AREAS WITHIN PUBLIC RIGHT -OF -WAY ARE TO BE RESTORED TO ORIGINAL CONDITION OR BETTER. 14. REPAIR AND REPLACEMENT OF ALL PRIVATE AND PUBLIC PROPERTY AFFECTED BY THIS WORK SHALL BE RESTORED TO A CONDITION EQUAL TO OR BETTER THAN EXISTING CONDITIONS BEFORE COMMENCING CONSTRUCTION WORK UNLESS SPECIFICALLY EXEMPTED BY THE PLANS. ADDITIONAL COSTS ARE INCIDENTAL TO OTHER CONSTRUCTION AND NO EXTRA COMPENSATION IS TO BE ALLOWED. 15. ALL DISTURBED AREAS WHICH ARE NOT TO BE SODDED ARE TO BE SEEDED AND MULCHED TO FDOT STANDARDS AND MAINTAINED UNTIL A SATISFACTORY STAND OF GRASS ACCEPTABLE TO THE REGULATORY AGENCY AND ENGINEER OF RECORD HAVE BEEN OBTAINED. ANY WASHOUTS, REGRADING, RESEEDING, AND GRASSING WORK AND OTHER EROSION WORK REQUIRED, WILL BE PERFORMED BY THE CONTRACTOR /SUBCONTRACTOR UNTIL THE SYSTEM IS ACCEPTED FOR MAINTENANCE BY THE REGULATORY AGENCY AND ENGINEER OF RECORDD. 16. CHAPTER 77 -153 OF THE FLORIDA STATUTES REQUIRES THAT AN EXCAVATOR NOTIFY ALL GAS UTILITIES A MINIMUM OF TWO WORKING DAYS PRIOR TO EXCAVATING. MAPS SHOW ONLY THE APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF GAS MAINS AND DO NOT SHOW SERVICE LINES. THE ONLY SAFE AND PROPER WAY TO LOCATE EITHER MAINS OR SERVICE LINES IS BY AN ON -SITE INSPECTION BY THE RESPECTIVE GAS PERSONNEL THEREFORE, EXCAVATORS ARE INSTRUCTED TO TELEPHONE THE RESPECTIVE GAS COMPANY TWO WORKING DAYS BEFORE ENTERING A CONSTRUCTION AREA. 17. RECORD DRAWINGS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR RECORDING INFORMATION ON A SET OF THE APPROVED PUNS CONCURRENTLY WITH CONSTRUCTION PROGRESS. WITHIN TWO (2) WEEKS FOLLOWING FINAL INSPECTION THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT ONE (1) SET OF RECORD DRAWINGS TO THE ENGINEER. THE FINAL RECORD DRAWINGS SHALL COMPLY WITH THE FOLLOWING REQUIREMENTS: 1. 2 h_ I� 3. 1. DRAWINGS TO BE LEGIBLY MARKED TO RECORD ACTUAL CONSTRUCTION. 2. DRAWINGS SHALL SHOW ACTUAL LOCATION OF ALL WATER AND WASTEWATER PIPING AND RELATED APPURTENANCES, BOTH ABOVE AND BELOW GROUND. ALL CHANGES TO PIPING LOCATION INCLUDING HORIZONTAL & VERTICAL LOCATIONS OF UTILITIES & APPURTENANCES SHALL BE CLEARLY SHOWN AND REFERENCED TO PERMANENT SURFACE IMPROVEMENTS. DRAWINGS SHALL ALSO SHOW ACTUAL INSTALLED PIPE MATERIAL, CLASS, ETC. 3. DRAWINGS SHALL CLEARLY SHOW ALL FIELD CHANGES OF DIMENSION AND DETAIL INCLUDING CHANGES MADE BY FIELD ORDER OR BY CHANGE ORDER. 4. DRAWINGS SHALL CLEARLY SHOW ALL DETAILS NOT ON ORIGINAL CONTRACT DRAWINGS BUT CONSTRUCTED IN THE FIELD. ALL EQUIPMENT AND PIPING RELOCATION SHALL BE CLEARLY SHOWN. 5. LOCATIONS OF ALL MANHOLES, HYDRANTS, VALVES, & VALVE BOXES SHALL BE SHOWN. ALL VALVES SHALL BE REFERENCED FROM AT LEAST TWO (2) AND PREFERABLY THREE (3) PERMANENT POINTS. PAVING & GRADING TESTING AND INSPECTION REQUIREMENTS THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR COORDINATING APPLICABLE TESTING WITH THE SOILS ENGINEER. SOILS ENGINEER TO SUPPLY THE ENGINEER WITH A PHOTOCOPY OF ALL COMPACTION TESTS AND ASPHALT RESULTS. THE SOILS ENGINEER IS TO CERTIFY TO THE ENGINEER OF RECORD IN WRITING THAT ALL TESTING REQUIREMENTS REQUIRED BY THE LOCAL REGULATORY AGENCY AND THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (FDOT) FOR THE IMPROVEMENTS AS REQUIRED BY THE CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS HAVE BEEN SATISFIED. CONTRACTOR TO REVIEW SOIL REPORTS AND BORINGS PRIOR TO BIDDING THE PROJECT AND COMMENCING CONSTRUCTION. CLEARING AND SITE PREPARATION NOTES 1. PRIOR TO ANY SITE CLEARING, ALL TREES SHOWN TO REMAIN ON THE CONSTRUCTION PLANS SHALL BE PROTECTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LOCAL REGULATORY AGENCY'S TREE ORDINANCE. IT IS THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO MAINTAIN THESE TREES IN GOOD CONDITION. NO TREES SHOWN TO REMAIN SHALL BE REMOVED WITHOUT WRITTEN APPROVAL FROM THE OWNER. ONLY "GRADING BY HAND" IS PERMITTED WITHIN THE CANOPY LINE OF TREES THAT ARE TO REMAIN. 2. THE CONTRACTOR IS TO PREPARE THE SITE PRIOR TO BEGINNING ACTUAL CONSTRUCTION IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE SOILS TESTING REPORT. COPIES OF THE SOILS REPORT ARE AVAILABLE THROUGH THE OWNER OR THE SOILS TESTING COMPANY. QUESTIONS REGARDING SITE PREPARATION REQUIREMENTS DESCRIBED IN THE SOILS REPORT ARE TO BE DIRECTED TO THE SOILS TESTING COMPANY. 3. CONTRACTOR SHALL CLEAR AND GRUB ONLY THOSE PORTIONS OF THE SITE NECESSARY FOR CONSTRUCTION. DISTURBED AREAS WILL 'BE SEEDED, MULCHED, OR PLANTED WITH OTHER APPROVED LANDSCAPE MATERIAL IMMEDIATELY FOLLOWING CONSTRUCTION. 4. THE TOP 4" TO 6" OF GROUND REMOVED DURING CLEARING AND GRUBBING SHALL BE STOCKPILED AT A SITE DESIGNATED BY THE OWNER TO BE USED FOR LANDSCAPING PURPOSES, UNLESS OTHERWISE DIRECTED BY THE OWNER. 5. ALL CONSTRUCTION DEBRIS AND OTHER WASTE MATERIAL SHALL BE DISPOSED OF OFF -SITE IN ACCORDANCE WITH APPLICABLE REGULATIONS. 6. CONTRACTOR TO OBTAIN ALL NECESSARY PERMITS AND APPROVALS PRIOR TO REMOVING ANY EXISTING STRUCTURES. 7. IT IS THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO NOTIFY ALL UTILITY COMPANIES TO DISCONNECT OR REMOVE THEIR FACILITIES PRIOR TO REMOVING OR DEMOLISHING ANY EXISTING STRUCTURES FROM THE SITE. 8. THE LOCATION OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES SHOWN ON THE PLANS HAVE BEEN DETERMINED FROM THE BEST INFORMATION AVAILABLE AND ARE GIVEN FOR THE CONVENIENCE OF THE CONTRACTOR /SUBCONTRACTOR. THE ENGINEER ASSUMES NO RESPONSIBILITY FOR ACCURACY PRIOR TO THE START OF ANY CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY. IT SHALL BE THE CONTRACTOR'S /SUBCONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY 0 NOTIFY THE VARIOUS UTILITIES AND TO MAKE THE NECESSARY ARRANGEMENTS FOR ANY RELOCATIONS OF THESE EXERCISE CAUTION UTILITIES. THE CONTRACTOR /SUBCONTRACTOR SHALL WHEN CROSSING ANY UNDERGROUND UTILITY, WHETHER SHOWN ON THE PLANS OR LOCATED BY THE UTILITY COMPANY. ALL UTILITIES WHICH INTERFACE WITH THE PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE RELOCATED BY THE AND THE CONTRACTOR /SUBCONTRACTOR AND SHALL COOPERATE WITH THE UTILITY COMPANIES DURING RELOCATION OPERATIONS. ANY DELAY OR INCONVENIENCE CAUSED TO THE CONTRACTOR /SUBCONTRACTOR BY THE VARIOUS UTILITIES SHALL BE INCIDENTAL TO THE CONTRACT AND NO EXTRA COMPENSATION WILL BE ALLOWED. PAVING AND GRADING NOTES 1. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PROTECTING EXCAVATIONS AGAINST COLLAPSE AND WILL PROVIDE BRACING SHEETING OR SHORING AS NECESSARY. TRENCHES SHALL BE KEPT DRY WHILE PIPE AND APPURTENANCES ARE BEING PLACED. DEWATERING SHALL BE USED AS REQUIRED. 2. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR OBTAINING THE NECESSARY DEWATERING PERMITS FROM THE LOCAL WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT OR OTHER REGULATORY AGENCY. 3. PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATIONS REPRESENT FINISHED PAVEMENT OR GROUND SURFACE GRADE UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED ON DRAWINGS. 4. IT MAY BE NECESSARY TO FIELD ADJUST PAVEMENT ELEVATIONS TO PRESERVE THE ROOT SYSTEMS OF TREES SHOWN TO BE SAVED. CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE WITH OWNER'S ENGINEER PRIOR TO ANY ELEVATION CHANGES. 5. CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE A 1/2" BITUMINOUS EXPANSION JOINT MATERIAL WITH SEALER AT ABUTMENT OF CONCRETE AND ANY STRUCTURE. 6. ALL PAVEMENT MARKINGS SHALL CONFORM TO FDOT STANDARD INDEX NO. 17346, SHEETS 1 -7. 7. CONTRACTOR SHALL TRIM, TACK, AND MATCH EXISTING PAVEMENT AT LOCATIONS WHERE NEW PAVEMENT MEETS EXISTING PAVEMENT. 8. CONTRACTOR IS TO PROVIDE EROSION CONTROL /SEDIMENTATION BARRIER (HAY BALES OR SILTATION CURTAIN) TO PREVENT SILTATION OF ADJACENT PROPERTY, STREETS, AND STORM SEWERS. IN ADDITION, CONTRACTOR SHALL PLACE STRAW, MULCH, OR OTHER SUITABLE MATERIAL ON GROUND IN AREAS WHERE CONSTRUCTION RELATED TRAFFIC IS TO ENTER AND EXIT THE SITE. IF, IN THE OPINION OF THE ENGINEER AND /OR LOCAL AUTHORITIES, EXCESSIVE QUANTITIES OF EARTH ARE TRANSPORTED OFF -SITE EITHER BY NATURAL DRAINAGE OR BY VEHICULAR TRAFFIC, THE CONTRACTOR IS TO REMOVE SAID EARTH TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE ENGINEER AND /OR AUTHORITIES. 9. IF WIND EROSION BECOMES SIGNIFICANT DURING CONSTRUCTION, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL STABILIZE THE AFFECTED AREA USING SPRINKLING, IRRIGATION, OR OTHER ACCEPTABLE METHODS. 10. THERE IS TO BE NO DISCHARGE (I.E. PUMPING, SHEET FLOW, SWALE, DITCH, ETC.) INTO EXISTING DITCHES OR CANALS WITHOUT THE USE OF SETTLING PONDS. IF THE CONTRACTOR DESIRES TO DISCHARGE INTO THE EXISTING DITCHES OR CANALS A SETTLING POND PLAN PREPARED BY THE CONTRACTOR MUST BE SUBMITTED TO AND APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER OF RECORD AND LOCAL REGULATORY AGENCY PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. WATER SYSTEM NOTES 1. A VERTICAL CLEARANCE OF 18 INCHES SHALL BE MAINTAINED BETWEEN SANITARY SEWERS AND WATER MAINS. IF CLEARANCE CANNOT BE ACHIEVED BY ADJUSTING WATER MAINS THE SANITARY SEWER SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED OF DUCTILE IRON CLASS 54 A MINIMUM OF 10 FEET ON BOTH SIDES OF THE CONFLICT POINT. AS AN ALTERNATIVE THE SANITARY SEWER MAY BE PLACED IN A SLEEVE OR ENCASED IN CONCRETE FOR THE REQUIRED 10 FEET ON EACH SIDE OF THE CONFLICT POINT. 2. A HORIZONTAL SEPARATION OF 10 FEET SHALL BE MAINTAINED BETWEEN WATER MAINS AND SANITARY SEWER. 3. ALL WATER MAINS SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM OF 30 INCHES AND A MAXIMUM OF 42" BELOW FINISHED GRADE. 4. ALL WATER SYSTEM WORK SHALL CONFORM WITH LOCAL REGULATORY STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS. 5. CONFLICTS BETWEEN WATER AND STORM OR SANITARY SEWER TO BE RESOLVED BY ADJUSTING THE WATER LINES AS NECESSARY. 6. CONTRACTOR TO INSTALL TEMPORARY BLOW -OFFS AT THE END OF WATER SERVICE LATERALS TO ASSURE ADEQUATE FLUSHING AND DISINFECTION. 7. RESTRAINING JOINTS SHALL BE PROVIDED AT ALL FITTINGS AND HYDRANTS AS SHOWN ON DETAILS. 8. MATERIALS AND CONSTRUCTION METHODS FOR WATER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LOCAL REGULATORY AGENCY CODES, PLANS, AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION, LATEST REVISION THEREOF AND SUPPLEMENTAL SPECIFICATIONS THERETO. APPROVAL AND CONSTRUCTION OF ALL POTABLE WATER SERVICE MAIN EXTENSIONS AND CONNECTIONS MUST BE COORDINATED THROUGH THE LOCAL REGULATORY AGENCY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC UTILITIES. 9. ALL UNDERGROUND PVC SHALL BE DR14 (C -900). WATER SYSTEM TESTING AND INSPECTION REQUIREMENT NOTES 1. ALL COMPONENTS OF THE WATER SYSTEM, INCLUDING FITTINGS, THRUST BLOCKING, HYDRANTS, CONNECTIONS, AND VALVES SHALL REMAIN UNCOVERED UNTIL PROPERLY PRESSURE TESTED AND ACCEPTED BY THE OWNER'S ENGINEER. PRESSURE TESTS TO BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH WATER DEPARTMENT SPECIFICATIONS. CONTRACTOR TO NOTIFY OWNER'S ENGINEER AND COUNTY INSPECTORS 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE OF PERFORMING TESTS. 2. CONTRACTOR TO PERFORM CHLORINATION AND BACTERIOLOGICAL SAMPLING AND OBTAIN CLEARANCE OF DOMESTIC WATER SYSTEM. COPIES OF ALL BACTERIOLOGICAL TESTS TO BE SUBMITTED TO OWNER'S ENGINEER. SANITARY SEWER NOTES 1. A HORIZONTAL SEPARATION OF 10 FEET SHALL BE MAINTAINED BETWEEN WATER MAINS AND SANITARY SEWER. 2. ALL SANITARY SEWER WORK SHALL CONFORM WITH LOCAL REGULATORY STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS. 3. SANITARY SEWER MAINS AND LATERALS SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM COVER OF THREE (3) FEET AND SHALL BE INSTALLED ACCOMPANIED BY A METAL TAPE SIMILAR TO "TERRATAPE" COLORED GREEN AND LAID ONE FOOT ABOVE THE PIPE. SANITARY SEWER TESTING AND INSPECTION REQUIREMENT NOTES 1. ALL GRAVITY SEWER PIPING SHALL BE SUBJECT TO A VISUAL INSPECTION BY THE OWNER'S ENGINEER. CONTRACTOR TO NOTIFY THE ENGINEER 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE TO SCHEDULE INSPECTION. DRAINAGE SYSTEM CONSTRUCTION NOTES 1. STANDARD INDEXES REFER TO THE LATEST EDITION OF FDOT "ROADWAY AND TRAFFIC DESIGN STANDARDS ". 2. ALL STORM SEWER PIPE SHALL BE REINFORCED CONCRETE CLASS III (ASTM C -76) WITH RUBBER GASKET JOINTS UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED ON PLANS. ALL DRAINAGE STRUCTURES SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH FDOT ROADWAY AND TRAFFIC DESIGN STANDARDS UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED ON PLANS. 3. PIPE LENGTHS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE AND TO THE CENTER OF DRAINAGE STRUCTURES WITH THE EXCEPTION OF MITERED END AND FLARED END SECTIONS WHICH ARE INCLUDED IN LENGTHS. 4. ALL DRAINAGE STRUCTURE GRATES AND COVERS WITHIN TRAFFIC AREAS SHALL BE TRAFFIC RATED FOR H -20 LOADINGS. 5. CONTRACTOR TO SOD THE DETENTION POND AS INDICATED ON PLANS WITHIN ONE WEEK FOLLOWING CONSTRUCTION OF THE POND. 6. ALL STORM DRAINAGE STRUCTURES DEEPER THAN TEN (10) FEET TO HAVE LADDER BARS. 7. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR OBTAINING THE NECESSARY DEWATERING PERMITS FROM THE LOCAL WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT OR OTHER REGULATORY AGENCY. 8. PROTECTION OF EXISTING STORM SEWERS SYSTEMS: DURING CONSTRUCTION, ALL STORM SEWER INLETS IN THE VICINITY OF THE PROJECT SHALL BE PROTECTED BY SEDIMENT TRAPS SUCH AS SECURED HAY BALES, SOD, STONE, ETC., WHICH SHALL BE MAINTAINED AND MODIFIED AS REQUIRED BY CONSTRUCTION PROGRESS. 9. MATERIALS AND CONSTRUCTION METHODS FOR STREETS AND STORM DRAINAGE CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LOCAL REGULATORY AGENCY AND THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR ROAD AND BRIDGE CONSTRUCTION, 1996, OR LATEST REVISION THEREOF AND SUPPLEMENTAL SPECIFICATIONS THERETO. 10. CLASS "B" TYPE I BEDDING SHALL BE USED UNLESS INDICATED OTHERWISE ON THE DRAWINGS, OR BY THE ENGINEER. 11.ALL ROUND REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE JOINTS UNDER PAVEMENT, DRIVEWAYS, AND SIDEWALKS WITHIN PUBLIC RIGHT -OF -WAY, AND ANY OUTFALL SYSTEM SHALL BE WRAPPED WITH MIRAFI 14 ON FILTER FABRIC OR EQUAL FABRIC TO BE A MIN. OF 30" IN WIDTH AND CENTERED ON PIPE. TESTING AND INSPECTION REQUIREMENTS 1. THE STORM DRAINAGE PIPING SYSTEM SHALL BE SUBJECT TO A VISUAL INSPECTION BY THE OWNER'S ENGINEER PRIOR TO THE PLACEMENT OF BACKFILL CONTRACTOR TO NOTIFY THE ENGINEER 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE TO SCHEDULE INSPECTION. 2. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN THE STORM DRAINAGE SYSTEMS UNTIL FINAL ACCEPTANCE OF THE PROJECT. THE STORM SYSTEM WILL BE INSPECTED BY THE OWNER'S ENGINEER PRIOR TO APPROVAL FOR CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY PURPOSES. SAFETY NOTES 1. DURING THE CONSTRUCTION AND /OR MAINTENANCE OF THIS PROJECT, ALL SAFETY REGULATIONS ARE- TO BE ENFORCED. THE CONTRACTOR OR HIS REPRESENTATIVE SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE CONTROL AND SAFETY OF THE TRAVELING PUBLIC AND THE SAFETY OF HIS PERSONNEL LABOR SAFETY REGULATIONS SHALL CONFORM TO THE PROVISIONS SET FORTH BY OSHA IN-THE' FEDERAL REGISTER OF THE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION. 2. THE MINIMUM STANDARDS AS SET FORTH IN THE CURRENT EDITION OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA, MANUAL- ON TRAFFIC CONTROL AND SAFE PRACTICES FOR STREET AND HIGHWAY CONSTRUCTION, MAINTENANCE AND UTILITY OPERATIONS SHALL BE FOLLOWED IN THE DESIGN APPLICATION, INSTALLATION, MAINTENANCE, AND REMOVAL OF ALL TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES, WARNING DEVICES, AND BARRIERS NECESSARY TO PROTECT THE PUBLIC AND WORKMEN FROM HAZARDS W!TH!'J THE PROJECT LIMITS. 3. ALL TRAFFIC CONTROL MARKINGS AND DEVICES SHALL CONFORM TO THE PROVISIONS SET FORTH IN THE MANUAL ON UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES PREPARED BY THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION. 4. IT SHALL BE THE SOLE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO COMPLY AND ENFORCE ALL APPLICABLE SAFETY REGULATIONS. THE ABOVE INFORMATION HAS BEEN PROVIDED FOR THE CONTRACTOR'S INFORMATION ONLY AND DOES NOT IMPLY THAT THE OWNER OR ENGINEER WILL INSPECT AND /OR ENFORCE SAFETY REGULATIONS. ORIGINAL RECEIVED AUG 17 2007 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER M Cl .I V) O cn cli ri v vi \�6 t--: Q tnI 0 04 P-4 U C? a � d � � b W W N W cd 0 ct C7 mz cal o .r..4 H o a cz c,f) �l V) O cn cli ri v vi \�6 t--: w (7 9 Q tnI 04 P-4 U a d w N E-i 0 ct C7 Z cal o .r..4 H F--� w wow Q w Q Z w 0O � w •� M M 00 y Dd >I Ll od o 0 un cd w Q w (7 9 U w tnI U N ri ct o .r..4 H F--� w wow °1 0O � w •� M M 00 y Dd od o 0 cd P, O00 rnI bA 0 v a O a� as 0 ti U U N ri ct o .r..4 1:4 � r� •� M M 00 y Dd od o 0 cd P, O00 Q� bA 0 a w a� CC3 W i STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN GENERAL EROSION AND TURBIDITY CONTROL NOTES 1. The Site Subcontractor shall be responsible for installation and maintenance of all erosion and turbidity controls and the quality and quantity of offsite or wetland discharges. 2. Prior to construction, the Site Subcontractor is responsible for having his dewatering plan and turbidity control plan approved by the applicable reviewing agencies. Refer to the project's permit approvals and permit conditions for agencies requiring such review and approval. Questions concerning appropriate techniques should be addressed to those agencies and /or discussed with the project engineer and owner. 3. The appropriate turbidity and erosion control methodologies selected by the Site Subcontractor for the this project should be made following assessment of the plans and project site specific factors and after consultations as needed with the project engineer and appropriate agencies. The Site Subcontractor will be responsible for obtaining any and all necessary permits for such activity; several factors to consider are listed below: A. Clay content in excavated materials and /or permeabilities rates B. Depth of cut in ponds, trenches, or utility lines C. Ambient ground water levels D. Actual rainfall amounts and time of year relative to normal rainy seasons E. Proximity to wetlands, water bodies or offsite properties F. 'Class' designation of receiving water bodies (i.e., Outstanding Florida Waters, shellfish harvest areas, etc.) G. Density, type, and proximity of upland vegetation to be retained during construction (for use as possible filtration areas) H. Fill height relative to natural grade and length and steepness of the proposed slopes I. Existing topography and directions of surface flow J. Type of equipment used K. Project type L. Duration of construction activities M. Separation distance of onsite ponds N. Ambient quality of surface and groundwater 0. Temporary stockpile locations and heights 4. At the onset of construction, the Site Subcontractor, as the party responsible for implementation of the erosion and sediment control plan, shall assess the above described conditions and factors with respect to relative cost effectiveness and select the appropriate methods of protetion. A fairly extensive list of techniques are presented below but it must be stressed that any or al of the following may be necessary to maintain water quality and quantity standards. The construction sequencing should be thought out in advance of initiation to provide adequate protection of water quality. 5. Discharges which exceed 29 N.T.U.'s over the background levels are in violation of state water quality standards. Discharges of water quantities which affect offsite properties or may damage wetlands are also prohibited by regulating agencies. 6. The erosion and turbidity control measures shown hereon are the minimum required for agency approval. Additional control and measures may be required due to the Site Subcontractor's construction sequence & unforeseen weather conditions. Any additional measures deemed necessary by the Site Subcontractor shall be included in the lump sum bid with no extras for materials and labor allowed. 7. Hay bales or silt screens shall be installed prior to land clearing to protect water quality and to identify areas to be protected from clearing activities and maintained for the duration of the project until all soil is stabilized. 8. Floating turbidity barriers shall be in place in flowing systems or in open water lake edges prior to initiation of earthwork and maintained for the duration of the project until all soil is stabilized. 9. No clay material shall be left exposed in any stormwater facility. If clay or sandy -clays are encountered during stormwater storage excavation, the Site Subcontractor shall notify the Engineer immediately before proceeding with further excavation. If the Engineer of Record has determined that such soils are non - confining and must be excavated to meet permit and design conditions, excavation may proceed after obtaining written authorization from the appropriate governing agency. If said soils are left exposed at the permitted and designed depth, the Site Subcontractor shall over - excavate the pond's bottom and side slopes by a minimum of twelve (12 ") inches and backfill with clean sands to help prevent suspension of fine particles in the water column. 10. The installation of temporary erosion control barriers shall be coordinated with the construction of the permanent erosion control features to the extent necessary to assure effective and continuous control of erosion and water pollution throughout the life of the construction phase. 11. The type of erosion control barriers used shall be governed by the nature of the construction operation and soil type that will be exposed. Silty and clayey material may require solid sediment barriers to prevent turbid water discharge, while sandy material may need only silt screens or have bales to prevent erosion. Floating turbidity curtains should generally be used in open water situations. Diversion ditches or swales may be required to prevent turbid stormwater runoff from being discharged to wetlands or other water bodies. It may be necessary to employ a combination of barriers, ditches and other erosion /turbidity control measures if conditions warrant. 12. Where pumps are to be used to remove turbid waters from construction areas, the water shall be treated prior to discharge to the wetlands. Treatment methods include, for example, turbid water being pumped into grassed swales or appropriate upland vegetated areas (other than upland preservation areas and wetland buffers), sediment basins, or confined by an appropriate enclosure such as turbidity barriers or low berms, and kept confined until turbidity levels meet State Water Quality Standards. 13. The Permittee shall schedule his operations such that the are unprotected erodible earth exposed at any one time is not larger that the minimum area necessary for efficient construction operation, and the duration of exposed, uncompleted construction to the elements shall be as short as practicable. Clearing and grubbing shall be so scheduled and performed such that grading operations can follow immediately thereafter. Grading operations shall be so scheduled and performed that permanent erosion control features can follow immediately thereafter if conditions on the project permit. 14. Water derived from various dewatering methods should be passed through sufficiently wide areas of existing upland vegetation to filter our excess turbidity. If this is not sufficient, the water shall be retained in previously constructed permanent stormwater ponds or else retained in temporary sedimentation basins until clarity is suitable to allow for its discharge. Plugging the outfalls from completed stormwater ponds may be needed to avoid discharge. However, such situations should be monitored closely to preclude berm failure if water levels rise too high. 15. Water can be transported around the site by the use of internal swales or by pumps and pipes. 16. Sheet flow of newly filled or scraped areas may be controlled or contained by the use of brush barriers, diversion swales, interceptor ditches or low berms. Flow should be directed toward areas where sediments can sufficiently settle out. 17. Exposed soils shall be stabilized as soon as possible, especially slopes leading to wetlands. Stabilization methods include solid sod, seeding and mulching or hydromulching to provide a temporary or permanent grass cover mulch blankets, filter fabrics, etc., can be employed to provide vegetative cover. 18. Energy dissipaters (such as rip rap, a gravel bed, hay bales, etc.) shall be installed at the discharge point of pipes or swales if scouring is observed. 19. Attempt to install roadway curb and gutters as soon as possible to reduce the surface area for erosion to occur. 20. Implement storm drain inlet protection (hay bales or gravel) to limit sedimentation within the stormwater system. Perform inspections and periodic cleaning of sediments which wash out into the streets until all soil is stabilized. 21. Water discharge velocities from impounded areas and temporary sedimentation basins shall be restricted to avoid scouring in receiving areas. 22. If water clarity does not reduce to state standards rapidly enough in holding ponds, it may be possible to use chemical agents such as alum to flocculate or coagulate the sediment particles. 23. Hay bales, silt screens, or gravel beds can be added around the pipe or Swale discharge points to help clarify discharges. Spreader swales may help dissipate cloudy water prior to contact with wetlands. 24. All fuel storage areas or other hazardous storage areas shall conform to accepted state or federal criteria for such containment areas. 25. Vehicle or equipment washdown areas will be sufficiently removed from wetlands or offsite areas. 26. Fugitive dust controls (primarily by using water spray trucks) shall be employed as needed to control windborn emissions. 27. If the above controls remain ineffective in precluding release of turbid water, especially during pond or utility line dewatering, then the well points or sock drains to withdraw groundwater which may already be clear enough to allow for direct discharge to wetlands. 28. Ongoing inspections and periodic maintenance by the Site Subcontractor shall occur throughout construction as necessary to insure the above methods are working suitably. This may be needed daily, if conditions so warrant. Site Subcontractors are encouraged to obtain and thoroughly review The Florida Development Manual: A Guide to Sound Land and Water Management, which was developed by the State of Florida Department of Environmental Protection in 1988. This provides fairly in -depth discussions of recommended techniques and also provides specific design and technical standards. A copy of this document is available for review at Water Resource Associates, Inc. Pond /Lake Excavation Note No excavation shall extend below the permitted design depths /elevations shown on the drawings, unless additional testing supports otherwise; and no lower semi - confining unit clayey soil material and /or no limestone materials shall be excavated, regardless if these materials are encountered within the permitted excavation depths /elevations. If any lower semi - confining unit clayey soil materials or limestone materials are encountered above the permitted depths /elevations, then excavation operations shall cease in the general area and the Engineer of Record shall be notified immediately. 36" WOODEN STAKE WOVEN SILT -LOK - - 36 300 P POLYPROPYLENE FABRIC OR APPROVED EQUAL To Current Action EXISTING GROUND Contained on these plans and within the following notes is a Storm Water An inspection form shall be completed for each inspection. Any permit 0 �% Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) which has been developed by Water Resource violations should be noted and corrective measures shall be taken no 1yP,001 <X Associates, Inc. in accordance with the Florida Department of Environmental later than 7 days after the inspection occurred. If revisions to the Limits of Const. Shore Line I�Structure Alignment Protection's (FDEP) "National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System" (NPDES) SWPPP are needed, a report form for changes in the SWPPP shall be o o I O o Barriers Generic Permit for Stormwater Discharge from Large and Small Construction completed and a copy sent to Water Resource Associates. The original Turbidity barriers for flowing streams and tidal creeks may be either floating, or staked types 1. Turbidity barriers are to be used in all permanent bodies of water regardless of water depth. y 9• YP a Activities. shall be kept on -site as documentation of the change. If the conditions and meet erosion control and water quality requirements. The barrier type(s) will 3. Deployment of barrier around pile locations may vary to accommodate construction operations. be at the Contractors option unless otherwise inspection passes, a certification that the facility is in compliance with specified in the plans, however payment will 4. Navigation may require segmenting barrier durting construction operations. be under the pay item(s) established in the The following entities are identified as team members of "SWPPP ": Water the SWPPP and the NPDES permit must be signed by a duly authorized 5. For additional information see Section 104 of the Standard Specifications. Stoked Turbidity Barrler. Posts In staked Resource Associates, the Developer as identified in the title box of these representative of the principal executive official of the operator of the position unless otherwise directed by the Engineer. plans, and the site contractor and his sub - contractors. Each team SWPPP with one of the following qualifications: member has specific responsibilities and obligations. In general, all team 1. Has successfully completed the Florida Stormwater, Erosion and members, with regard to their involvement and responsibilities on the Sediment Control Inspector Training Program. � project, are to implement all necessary storm water management controls to assure compliance with the NPDES Generic Permit for Storm Water 2. Successfully completed a similar training program. Discharges from Construction Activities, the Southwest Florida Water crI Management District Permit, the applicable local governing agency (i.e. 3. Has enough practical on the job training to be qualified to perform the W A � Pinellas County, City of Clearwater, etc.) and the guidelines listed in the inspections. SWPPP. The duties and responsibilities of the team members as they pertain to the SWPPP are as follows. Retain inspection reports and certifications for at least three years. Cd G. Site stabilization measures shall be initiated as soon as practical but ' Water Resource Associates. Inc. in no case more than 7 days, in portions of the site where C, td N construction activities have temporarily or permanently ceased. a Z A. Develop SWPPP including, but not limited to, retention /detention ponds, control structures, erosion control methods and locations and H. Releases in Excess of Reportable Quantities. stabilization criteria. This design is included within these construction plans and the following notes and instructions. 1. The discharge of hazardous substances or oil in the stormwater � as discharge(s) from a facility or activity shall be prevented or minimized B. Develop SWPPP including, but not limited to, retention /detention ponds, in accordance with the applicable stormwater pollution prevention plan control structures, erosion control methods and locations and for the facility or activity. This permit does not relieve the operator of stabilization criteria. This design is included within these construction the reporting requirements of 40 CFR part 117 and 40 CFR part 302. plans and the following notes and instructions. Where a release containing a hazardous substance in amount equal to w or in excess of a reporting quantity established under either 40 CFR C. Upon notification by the developer of his intent to commence 117 or 40 CFR 302, occurs during a 24 hour period: construction, submit a Notice of Intent to the FDEP on behalf of the a developer and copy the contractor including SWPPP certification and a. The operator is required to notify the State Warning Point copy of the permit. (800- 210 -0519 or 850 - 413 -9911) as soon as he or she has knowledge of the discharge; NI D. Submit to SWFWMD and the operator of the municipal separate storm o water system, if applicable, a letter of construction commencement. b. The operator shall submit within 14 calendar days of knowledge of the release a written description of: the release (including the type and ,. E. Complete and submit a Notice of Termination and certification for estimate of the amount of material released), the date that such developer. release occurred, the circumstances leading to the release, and The NOT's shall be submitted no more than 30 days after remedial steps to be taken, to the Florida Department of Environmental (a) completion of the project and final stabilization of the site or Protection, NPDES Stormwater Section, Mail Station 2500, 2600 Blair o (b) when responsibility for the site has ended. Final stabilization as defined Stone Road, Tallahassee, Florida 32399 -2400; and by EPA is when all soil disturbing activities at the site have been completed and a uniform (e.g. evenly distributed, without large bare c. The stormwater pollution prevention plan required under Part V of this o areas) perennial vegetative cover with a density of 70% of the native permit must be modified within 14 calendar days of knowledge of the background vegetative cover for the area has been established on all release: to provide a description of the release, the circumstances U' unpaved areas and areas not covered by permanent structures. As an leading to the release, and the date of the release. In addition, the o alternative, equivalent permanent stabilization measures (such as riprap, plan must be reviewed to identify measures to prevent the Cd gabions, or geotextiles) may be employed. The client shall notify Water reoccurrence of such releases and to respond to such releases, and C Resource Associates when one of these criteria has been met. the plan must be modified where appropriate. 2. This permit does not authorize the discharge of hazardous substances a or oil resulting from an on -site spill. Contractor A. Sign and return to WRA a Contractors Certification Form certifying your Developer understanding of and willingness to comply with the Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan no later than 48 hours prior to commencement A. Notify WRA of your intent to commence construction. Sign the Notice of construction. Also, each subcontractor affected by the SWPPP must of Intent form as operator of the storm water discharge facility and >; � certify to the contractor that they understand and shall comply with the P ermittee and return to Water Resource Associates, Inc. NPDES permit and SWPPP. A record of these certifications shall be B. Sign a Certification of Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan and return omaintained by the contractor on site. it to Water Resource Associates, Inc. w B. During construction, assure compliance with the designed Storm Water C. Notify WRA when it is time to submit a Notice of Termination as Pollution Prevention Plans prepared by Water Resource Associates and defined under Part E of the Water resource Associates section of the the NPDES Generic Permit for Storm Water Discharges from Large and SWPPP. Sign and return to Water Resource Associates, Inc. for y Small Construction Activities. submittal to FDEP a Notice of Termination form and certification. 'Z C. Maintain a copy of the construction plans, which include the Storm PRE - DEVELOPED SITE INFORMATION: Water Pollution Prevention Plan, the NOT, and all inspections reports and w certifications on site. 1. Total site acreage: 0.93 AC. la U D. Undertake all reasonable Best Management Practices (BMP's) to assure 2. Land use: COMMERCIAL & SERVICES II that sited or otherwise polluted storm water is not allowed to discharge 3. Vegetation. NONE .l from the site during all phases of construction. Stabilization BMP's that 4. Receiving waters or municipal separate storm waters stem: may be used include: straw bale dikes, silt fences, earth dikes, brush CLEARWATER BAY _ barriers, drainage swales, check dams, subsurface drain, pipe slope drain, level spreaders, storm drain inlet protection, outlet protection, sediment 5. 25 Year /24 Hour rainfall depth: 9.0" traps, and temporary sediment basins. Detention ponds may also be 6. Soil types: ARENTS - URBAN LAND COMPLEX used as temporary sediment basins. Additional BMP's that may need to be implemented include: providing protected storage areas for chemicals, N paints, solvents, fertilizers, and other potentially toxic materials. Providing PROJECT INFORMATION: waste receptacles at convenient locations and providing regular collection 1. Project type: PARKING GARAGE 0 of wastes, including building material wastes. Minimizing off -site tracking of sediments. Making adequate preparations, including training and 2. Anticipated construction sequence is as follows: equipment to contain spills of oil and hazardous materials. Complying 1. Complete erosion control installation with applicable state or local waste disposal, sanitary sewer or septic 2. Clearing and grubbing la o system regulations and the use of appropriate pollution prevention 3. Earthwork activities a measures for allowable non -storm water components of discharge. 4. Storm water system construction E. Notify Water Resource Associates and the developer in writing of any 5. Utility construction 6. Base and pavement construction non -storm water pollution sources which are being stored, or otherwise 7. Final stabilization used during the construction of the project, i.e., fertilizers, fuels, pesticides, other chemicals. The notification should be accompanied with The BMP's listed in Part D of the Contractor section of the SWPPP the contractor's design and methods to prevent pollution run -off from shall be considered during all phases of construction. these sources. 3. Anticipated start date: 09/01/2007 F. Develop a maintenance and inspection plan which includes, but is not 4. Anticipated completion date: 12/30/2007 limited to the following: 5. Total acres disturbed: 0.93 AC. A. The specific areas to be inspected and maintained that includes all the 6• Pre - developed "CN" number: 98 AVG. disturbed areas and material storage areas of the site. 7. Post - developed "CN" number: 98 AVG. B. The erosion and sediment controls identified in the SWPPP to be 8. The storm water management system, upon completion and appropriate maintained and inspected and those additional controls that the certification and as -built submittals will be operated and maintained contractor deems necessary. by: LUCCA DEVELOPMENT, LLC C. Maintenance procedures. 9. The potential source of pollution from this project is on -site development and construction activity. D. The procedure to follow if additional work is required or whom to call. E. Inspections and maintenance forms. F. The personnel assigned to each task. The following shall be inspected a minimum of once a week or within 24 hours after 0.50 inches of rainfall: Stabilization measures (once a month if fully stabilized). Structural controls. Discharge points. ^� Construction entrances and exits. Areas used for storage of exposed materials. GENERAL EROSION AND TURBIDITY CONTROL NOTES 1. The Site Subcontractor shall be responsible for installation and maintenance of all erosion and turbidity controls and the quality and quantity of offsite or wetland discharges. 2. Prior to construction, the Site Subcontractor is responsible for having his dewatering plan and turbidity control plan approved by the applicable reviewing agencies. Refer to the project's permit approvals and permit conditions for agencies requiring such review and approval. Questions concerning appropriate techniques should be addressed to those agencies and /or discussed with the project engineer and owner. 3. The appropriate turbidity and erosion control methodologies selected by the Site Subcontractor for the this project should be made following assessment of the plans and project site specific factors and after consultations as needed with the project engineer and appropriate agencies. The Site Subcontractor will be responsible for obtaining any and all necessary permits for such activity; several factors to consider are listed below: A. Clay content in excavated materials and /or permeabilities rates B. Depth of cut in ponds, trenches, or utility lines C. Ambient ground water levels D. Actual rainfall amounts and time of year relative to normal rainy seasons E. Proximity to wetlands, water bodies or offsite properties F. 'Class' designation of receiving water bodies (i.e., Outstanding Florida Waters, shellfish harvest areas, etc.) G. Density, type, and proximity of upland vegetation to be retained during construction (for use as possible filtration areas) H. Fill height relative to natural grade and length and steepness of the proposed slopes I. Existing topography and directions of surface flow J. Type of equipment used K. Project type L. Duration of construction activities M. Separation distance of onsite ponds N. Ambient quality of surface and groundwater 0. Temporary stockpile locations and heights 4. At the onset of construction, the Site Subcontractor, as the party responsible for implementation of the erosion and sediment control plan, shall assess the above described conditions and factors with respect to relative cost effectiveness and select the appropriate methods of protetion. A fairly extensive list of techniques are presented below but it must be stressed that any or al of the following may be necessary to maintain water quality and quantity standards. The construction sequencing should be thought out in advance of initiation to provide adequate protection of water quality. 5. Discharges which exceed 29 N.T.U.'s over the background levels are in violation of state water quality standards. Discharges of water quantities which affect offsite properties or may damage wetlands are also prohibited by regulating agencies. 6. The erosion and turbidity control measures shown hereon are the minimum required for agency approval. Additional control and measures may be required due to the Site Subcontractor's construction sequence & unforeseen weather conditions. Any additional measures deemed necessary by the Site Subcontractor shall be included in the lump sum bid with no extras for materials and labor allowed. 7. Hay bales or silt screens shall be installed prior to land clearing to protect water quality and to identify areas to be protected from clearing activities and maintained for the duration of the project until all soil is stabilized. 8. Floating turbidity barriers shall be in place in flowing systems or in open water lake edges prior to initiation of earthwork and maintained for the duration of the project until all soil is stabilized. 9. No clay material shall be left exposed in any stormwater facility. If clay or sandy -clays are encountered during stormwater storage excavation, the Site Subcontractor shall notify the Engineer immediately before proceeding with further excavation. If the Engineer of Record has determined that such soils are non - confining and must be excavated to meet permit and design conditions, excavation may proceed after obtaining written authorization from the appropriate governing agency. If said soils are left exposed at the permitted and designed depth, the Site Subcontractor shall over - excavate the pond's bottom and side slopes by a minimum of twelve (12 ") inches and backfill with clean sands to help prevent suspension of fine particles in the water column. 10. The installation of temporary erosion control barriers shall be coordinated with the construction of the permanent erosion control features to the extent necessary to assure effective and continuous control of erosion and water pollution throughout the life of the construction phase. 11. The type of erosion control barriers used shall be governed by the nature of the construction operation and soil type that will be exposed. Silty and clayey material may require solid sediment barriers to prevent turbid water discharge, while sandy material may need only silt screens or have bales to prevent erosion. Floating turbidity curtains should generally be used in open water situations. Diversion ditches or swales may be required to prevent turbid stormwater runoff from being discharged to wetlands or other water bodies. It may be necessary to employ a combination of barriers, ditches and other erosion /turbidity control measures if conditions warrant. 12. Where pumps are to be used to remove turbid waters from construction areas, the water shall be treated prior to discharge to the wetlands. Treatment methods include, for example, turbid water being pumped into grassed swales or appropriate upland vegetated areas (other than upland preservation areas and wetland buffers), sediment basins, or confined by an appropriate enclosure such as turbidity barriers or low berms, and kept confined until turbidity levels meet State Water Quality Standards. 13. The Permittee shall schedule his operations such that the are unprotected erodible earth exposed at any one time is not larger that the minimum area necessary for efficient construction operation, and the duration of exposed, uncompleted construction to the elements shall be as short as practicable. Clearing and grubbing shall be so scheduled and performed such that grading operations can follow immediately thereafter. Grading operations shall be so scheduled and performed that permanent erosion control features can follow immediately thereafter if conditions on the project permit. 14. Water derived from various dewatering methods should be passed through sufficiently wide areas of existing upland vegetation to filter our excess turbidity. If this is not sufficient, the water shall be retained in previously constructed permanent stormwater ponds or else retained in temporary sedimentation basins until clarity is suitable to allow for its discharge. Plugging the outfalls from completed stormwater ponds may be needed to avoid discharge. However, such situations should be monitored closely to preclude berm failure if water levels rise too high. 15. Water can be transported around the site by the use of internal swales or by pumps and pipes. 16. Sheet flow of newly filled or scraped areas may be controlled or contained by the use of brush barriers, diversion swales, interceptor ditches or low berms. Flow should be directed toward areas where sediments can sufficiently settle out. 17. Exposed soils shall be stabilized as soon as possible, especially slopes leading to wetlands. Stabilization methods include solid sod, seeding and mulching or hydromulching to provide a temporary or permanent grass cover mulch blankets, filter fabrics, etc., can be employed to provide vegetative cover. 18. Energy dissipaters (such as rip rap, a gravel bed, hay bales, etc.) shall be installed at the discharge point of pipes or swales if scouring is observed. 19. Attempt to install roadway curb and gutters as soon as possible to reduce the surface area for erosion to occur. 20. Implement storm drain inlet protection (hay bales or gravel) to limit sedimentation within the stormwater system. Perform inspections and periodic cleaning of sediments which wash out into the streets until all soil is stabilized. 21. Water discharge velocities from impounded areas and temporary sedimentation basins shall be restricted to avoid scouring in receiving areas. 22. If water clarity does not reduce to state standards rapidly enough in holding ponds, it may be possible to use chemical agents such as alum to flocculate or coagulate the sediment particles. 23. Hay bales, silt screens, or gravel beds can be added around the pipe or Swale discharge points to help clarify discharges. Spreader swales may help dissipate cloudy water prior to contact with wetlands. 24. All fuel storage areas or other hazardous storage areas shall conform to accepted state or federal criteria for such containment areas. 25. Vehicle or equipment washdown areas will be sufficiently removed from wetlands or offsite areas. 26. Fugitive dust controls (primarily by using water spray trucks) shall be employed as needed to control windborn emissions. 27. If the above controls remain ineffective in precluding release of turbid water, especially during pond or utility line dewatering, then the well points or sock drains to withdraw groundwater which may already be clear enough to allow for direct discharge to wetlands. 28. Ongoing inspections and periodic maintenance by the Site Subcontractor shall occur throughout construction as necessary to insure the above methods are working suitably. This may be needed daily, if conditions so warrant. Site Subcontractors are encouraged to obtain and thoroughly review The Florida Development Manual: A Guide to Sound Land and Water Management, which was developed by the State of Florida Department of Environmental Protection in 1988. This provides fairly in -depth discussions of recommended techniques and also provides specific design and technical standards. A copy of this document is available for review at Water Resource Associates, Inc. Pond /Lake Excavation Note No excavation shall extend below the permitted design depths /elevations shown on the drawings, unless additional testing supports otherwise; and no lower semi - confining unit clayey soil material and /or no limestone materials shall be excavated, regardless if these materials are encountered within the permitted excavation depths /elevations. If any lower semi - confining unit clayey soil materials or limestone materials are encountered above the permitted depths /elevations, then excavation operations shall cease in the general area and the Engineer of Record shall be notified immediately. 36" WOODEN STAKE WOVEN SILT -LOK - - 36 300 P POLYPROPYLENE FABRIC OR APPROVED EQUAL STAKED SILT BARRIER DETAIL N.T.S. 36" WOODEN STAKE r HAY BALE 7_ J EXISTING r GROUND\ \ i r � w 2' MINI STAKED HAY BALE DETAIL N.T.S. 1l" Vinyl Sheathed EAW Steel Cable (9800 Lbs. Breaking Strength) With Galvanized Connectors (Tool Free Disconnect) Slotted PVC Connector Pipe Closed Cell Solid Plastic Foam (Metal Collar Reinforced) Flotation (8" Dia. Equiv.) (17 lbs. Per Ft. I C18 Oz. Nylon Reinforced d 18 Oz. Nylon Reinforced PVC Fabric (300 psi Test)) PVC Fabric (300 psi Test) Stress Plate eGalvanized Chain With Lacing Grommets TYPE II TYPE 1 o D, =5' STD. (SINGLE PANEL FOR DEPTHS 5' OR LESS) D, =5' STD. (ADDITIONAL PANEL FOR DEPTHS > 5') CURTAIN TO REACH BOTTOM UP TO DEPTHS OF 10 FEET. TWO(2) PANELS TO BE USED FOR DEPTHS GREATER THAN 10 FEET UNLESS SPECIAL DEPTH CURTAINS SPECIFICALLY CALLED FOR IN THE PLANS OR AS DETERMINED BY THE ENGINEER. NOTICE: COMPONENTS OF TYPES I AND 11 MAY BE SIMILAR OR IDENTICAL TO PROPRIETARY DESIGNS. ANY INFRINGEMENT ON THE PROPRIETARY RIGHTS OF THE DESIGNER SHALL BE THE SOLE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE USER. SUBSTITUTIONS FOR TYPES I AND II SHALL BE AS APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER. o LEGEND Proposed Toe Of Slope ° Pile Locations (( i a xisting ® Dredge Or Fill Area r -.0 Mooring Buoy w /Anchor f f kr/ Causeway 1 -i Anchor Barrier Movement Due w To Current Action EXISTING GROUND 0 0 �% ,:- 1yP,001 <X Shore Line imits of Const. AND FI LL Limits of Const. Shore Line I�Structure Alignment STAKED SILT BARRIER DETAIL N.T.S. 36" WOODEN STAKE r HAY BALE 7_ J EXISTING r GROUND\ \ i r � w 2' MINI STAKED HAY BALE DETAIL N.T.S. 1l" Vinyl Sheathed EAW Steel Cable (9800 Lbs. Breaking Strength) With Galvanized Connectors (Tool Free Disconnect) Slotted PVC Connector Pipe Closed Cell Solid Plastic Foam (Metal Collar Reinforced) Flotation (8" Dia. Equiv.) (17 lbs. Per Ft. I C18 Oz. Nylon Reinforced d 18 Oz. Nylon Reinforced PVC Fabric (300 psi Test)) PVC Fabric (300 psi Test) Stress Plate eGalvanized Chain With Lacing Grommets TYPE II TYPE 1 o D, =5' STD. (SINGLE PANEL FOR DEPTHS 5' OR LESS) D, =5' STD. (ADDITIONAL PANEL FOR DEPTHS > 5') CURTAIN TO REACH BOTTOM UP TO DEPTHS OF 10 FEET. TWO(2) PANELS TO BE USED FOR DEPTHS GREATER THAN 10 FEET UNLESS SPECIAL DEPTH CURTAINS SPECIFICALLY CALLED FOR IN THE PLANS OR AS DETERMINED BY THE ENGINEER. NOTICE: COMPONENTS OF TYPES I AND 11 MAY BE SIMILAR OR IDENTICAL TO PROPRIETARY DESIGNS. ANY INFRINGEMENT ON THE PROPRIETARY RIGHTS OF THE DESIGNER SHALL BE THE SOLE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE USER. SUBSTITUTIONS FOR TYPES I AND II SHALL BE AS APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER. o LEGEND Proposed Toe Of Slope ° Pile Locations (( i a xisting ® Dredge Or Fill Area r -.0 Mooring Buoy w /Anchor f f kr/ Causeway 1 -i Anchor Barrier Movement Due w To Current Action Shore Line 0 0 �% 0� 1yP,001 00 Shore Line imits of Const. Current Limits of Const. Shore Line I�Structure Alignment w Turbidity o o I O o Barriers Note: NOTES: Turbidity barriers for flowing streams and tidal creeks may be either floating, or staked types 1. Turbidity barriers are to be used in all permanent bodies of water regardless of water depth. y 9• YP a or any combination of types that will suit site 2. Number and spacing of anchors dependent on current velocities. conditions and meet erosion control and water quality requirements. The barrier type(s) will 3. Deployment of barrier around pile locations may vary to accommodate construction operations. be at the Contractors option unless otherwise specified in the plans, however payment will 4. Navigation may require segmenting barrier durting construction operations. be under the pay item(s) established in the plans for Floating Turbidity Barrier and /or 5. For additional information see Section 104 of the Standard Specifications. Stoked Turbidity Barrler. Posts In staked turbidity barriers to be Installed In vertical rnl position unless otherwise directed by the Engineer. TURBIDITY BARRIER DETAIL FDOT INDEX 103 SCALE: N.T.S. Closed Cell Solid Plastic Foam Flotation (6" Dia. Equiv.) (12 lbs. Per Ft. Buoyancy) , - i'Polypro Rope (600 lb. Breaking Strength) %'Galvanized Chain 0 Post (Options: 2' x 4" Or 21h" Min. Dia. Wood; Steel t ip M s/Ft. Min.) 18 Oz. Nylon Reinforced PVC Fabric (300 psi Test) o 0 STAKED TURBIDITY BARRIER GENERAL NOTES 1. Floating turbidity barriers are to be paid for under the contract unit price for Floating Turbidity Barrier, LF. 2. Staked turbidity barriers are to be paid for under the contract unit price for Floating Turbidity Barrier, LF. ORIGINAL QECEIVrV AUG 17 2007 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF C"WATER V) O U0 _- N M 4 vi 116 w 0 0 C7 E--� � a OZ w 0 H w 00 N L) C? w � Q � 0 W Cz O a � Ci V) O U0 _- N M 4 vi 116 w w 0 C7 E--� � a OZ w 0 H w Ix d �I Q N L) w w of Q U w w Q w w v1l rn (�3 N L) w w of C) P4 U w rnl Cd C> v R � N 0 (�3 U Cd C> U � N crI W A � it c CIS U Cd ' kr; 3 C, td N a Z 00 G � as M w 3 b 0 b 0 U CD C i 0 G O Qi v 0 �I 0 c� 00 i; U 0 v cd o� V 0 w U O P. W �v 0 �Q 4 U _ (( M N n 0 0 N i a b 8 3 �1 CD CD C. 3 O ti FCM 4 "x4" W/P I N .yo v o° w ^o xary�o� k ti� tt COLUMBIA SUBDIVISION NO. 2 eb 3 a aSN &D ;; P.B. 21, PG 79 °� 1 2 #4513 h p CO C o a�2 ? a a ® S77-2,5 '30" W a� a hb N�42, 220 00 ' f a W�° a CONC ® 4 =0�, �FJ a U Q -t t", FF COLUMBIA SUBDIVISION NO. �ti c a a' ASP EL, =5.34' F.F. a, a• 1h i x� aZ N HALT EL. =5_33' F. F. ago, m P.B. 21, PG 46 O Z m �'3 1 —STORY EL. =5.34 ' g`L c,� o U zo. �4. MASONRY F. F. 2705 O (� F.F. EL. =5.36' EL. =5.36' #345 O Q 0� F.F. O p 3 ?' EL. =5.36' F. F. (� o EL. =5.33' 2 94.8' ry tKO as a� 1Z CONC � om U cv a• � as �- ,PSN &D etK 1 —STORY x #4513 lb 5 a`O a m� h`' F.F. EL. =5.66' MASONRY GAS, y pp0 a h h #346 `GASH a. co ^ a•°^ n G1 o, � 2 h. `GAS .6 (H h i _ Cow, 62.6' V � � J W V x x"y CURB INLET �2 TOP = 3.66 6 � T eA ® V A�R� A �� WAR' `WAT tY © W 7£� , 3 W NOTES= A7 1. TYPE OF SURVEY: TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY 2. DATE OF SURVEY: MAY 22, 2007. 3. SURVEY CREW: SCOTT WILLIAMS and DALE ANDERSON 4. ELEVATIONS SHOWN HEREON ARE IN FEET AND REFER TO THE NORTH AMERICAN VERTICAL DATUM OF 1988. (N.A.V.D.) 5. REFERENCE BENCHMARK IS CITY OF CLEARWATER BENCHMARK NO. G -03, DISC LOCATED ON THE LOADING DOCK AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE U.S. POST OFFICE. ELEVATION = 4.749 6. NO UNDERGROUND INSTALLATIONS OR IMPROVEMENTS HAVE BEEN LOCATED EXCEPT AS SHOWN. 7. THIS SURVEY DOES NOT REFLECT NOR DETERMINE OWNERSHIP. 8. USE OF THIS SURVEY BY ANYONE OTHER THAN THOSE PREPARED FOR WILL BE THE RE —USERS SOLE RISK WITHOUT LIABILITY TO THE SURVEYOR. 9. THERE MAY BE ITEMS DRAWN OUT OF SCALE TO GRAPHICALLY SHOW THEIR LOCATION. 10. ONLY TREES FOUR (4) INCHES AND LARGER DIAMETER AT BREAST HEIGHT (DBH), WERE LOCATED AND SHOWN ON MAP OF SURVEY. 11. BEARINGS HEREON ARE BASED UPON THE WESTERLY RIGHT —OF —WAY LINE OF HAMDEN DRIVE, SAID LINE BEARS N12 °34'30 "E, PER PLAT. 12. ALL DISTANCES SHOWN HEREON ARE FIELD MEASURED UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 13. INFORMATION DEPICTING SUB SURFACE UTILITIES BASED ON SURVEY COMPLETED 12/9/04 ADJUSTED TO N.A.V.D. 88 DATUM AND HAS NOT BEEN FIELD VERIFIED. x �o. 6 t%Z �p nJ RAM RM3 I (U (60 00, ��� 2 VALLEy CURB ® R/w T x 1b, _ _ ER CONSTRN�TION x � ,�, x B°C� ti^ v x v v FLOOD ZONE NOTES o By graphic plotting only, this property is in the following Flood Zones: "AE ", having a Base Flood Elevation of 12.0 feet above Mean Sea Level; also "AE ", having a Base Flood Elevation of 11.0 feet above Mean Sea Level, of the Flood Insurance Rate Map, Community Panel No. 12103CO102G, which bears an effective date of September 3, 2003. Zone "AE" is considered to be in Special Flood Hazard Areas. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot 9, and 10 of COLUMBIA SUBDIVISION NO. 3, according to the Plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 27, Page(s) 46, of the Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida. And Lot 12, 13, and 14, Block A, COLUMBIA SUBDIVISION NO. 2, according to the plat thereof, recorded in Plat Book 21, Page 79, of the Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida (AKA 347 &353 Coronado) i � a W o p > � Z ti � �i Z at.- O q _j FN iY I S� 0'45'56" (p ) 10.001 8'56',- (F) SEAWALL 0 w a v J u O 3Q.,E FIR 1/2' 15 U GRAPHIC SCALE 10 20 40 IN FEET 1 in.= 20 ft. WATER RESOURCE A SSOCIA TES NO TES: EXISTING CONDITIONS SHEET COMPILED BY WATER RESOURCE A SSOCIA TES USING INFORMATION FROM A SUNCOA S T LAND SURVEYING, INC. TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY ORIGINAL RECEIVED AUG 17 2001 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER $ •c�jJ T. U_ r / LU !!!il11111'�, t` a ° Z w �• w 4 „ C/) C7 b - Cd O Cd U O a Cn V) 0 III II r i c*i 4 vi 1�6 V-:11 V1 O Z Q H C� Q O > U �fU ~ UI W Q W Q �I �IN 00 W W rWl OI � W a a,lO 0 U ~� U N o Cd 11 U � O N N C) d o I'o 00 bj rn SC Q w b w 53 2 '~ o o r. U N 00 o CC3 w ilf 13. INFORMATION DEPICTING SUB SURFACE UTILITIES BASED ON SURVEY COMPLETED 12/9/04 ADJUSTED TO N.A.V.D. 88 DATUM AND HAS NOT BEEN FIELD VERIFIED. x �o. 6 t%Z �p nJ RAM RM3 I (U (60 00, ��� 2 VALLEy CURB ® R/w T x 1b, _ _ ER CONSTRN�TION x � ,�, x B°C� ti^ v x v v FLOOD ZONE NOTES o By graphic plotting only, this property is in the following Flood Zones: "AE ", having a Base Flood Elevation of 12.0 feet above Mean Sea Level; also "AE ", having a Base Flood Elevation of 11.0 feet above Mean Sea Level, of the Flood Insurance Rate Map, Community Panel No. 12103CO102G, which bears an effective date of September 3, 2003. Zone "AE" is considered to be in Special Flood Hazard Areas. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot 9, and 10 of COLUMBIA SUBDIVISION NO. 3, according to the Plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 27, Page(s) 46, of the Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida. And Lot 12, 13, and 14, Block A, COLUMBIA SUBDIVISION NO. 2, according to the plat thereof, recorded in Plat Book 21, Page 79, of the Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida (AKA 347 &353 Coronado) i � a W o p > � Z ti � �i Z at.- O q _j FN iY I S� 0'45'56" (p ) 10.001 8'56',- (F) SEAWALL 0 w a v J u O 3Q.,E FIR 1/2' 15 U GRAPHIC SCALE 10 20 40 IN FEET 1 in.= 20 ft. WATER RESOURCE A SSOCIA TES NO TES: EXISTING CONDITIONS SHEET COMPILED BY WATER RESOURCE A SSOCIA TES USING INFORMATION FROM A SUNCOA S T LAND SURVEYING, INC. TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY ORIGINAL RECEIVED AUG 17 2001 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER $ •c�jJ T. U_ r / LU !!!il11111'�, t` a ° Z w �• w 4 „ C/) C7 b - Cd O Cd U O a Cn V) 0 III II r i c*i 4 vi 1�6 V-:11 V1 O Z Q H C� Q O > U �fU ~ UI W Q W Q �I �IN 00 W W rWl OI � W a a,lO 0 U ~� U N o Cd 11 U � O N N C) d o I'o 00 bj rn SC Q w b w 53 2 '~ o o r. U N 00 o CC3 w ilf t` a ° Z w �• w 4 „ C/) C7 b - Cd O Cd U O a Cn V) 0 III II r i c*i 4 vi 1�6 V-:11 V1 O Z Q H C� Q O > U �fU ~ UI W Q W Q �I �IN 00 W W rWl OI � W a a,lO 0 U ~� U N o Cd 11 U � O N N C) d o I'o 00 bj rn SC Q w b w 53 2 '~ o o r. U N 00 o CC3 w ilf V) 0 III II r i c*i 4 vi 1�6 V-:11 V1 O Z Q H C� Q O > U �fU ~ UI W Q W Q �I �IN 00 W W rWl OI � W a a,lO 0 U ~� U N o Cd 11 U � O N N C) d o I'o 00 bj rn SC Q w b w 53 2 '~ o o r. U N 00 o CC3 w ilf U ~� U N o Cd 11 U � O N N C) d o I'o 00 bj rn SC Q w b w 53 2 '~ o o r. U N 00 o CC3 w ilf ilf GRAPHIC SCALE POND 1 20 0 10 20 40 "r ,1 FPK"':P // 1 % TOB EL. = 5.00 1r I 13 _' ; ,,• �11 1b, r` o' TOB AREA= 7376 SF + ' q " _- f '`' COLUMBIA SUBDIVI -�10i 1 NO. 2 1-_ �; ,;� TOS EL. = 3.50 (nv FEET) - SANITAR'i' MH •; "�; SHW EL. = 2.00 1 in. = 20 ft. 4. DEVELOPED USE: RIM ='t 19' -� ;r ( �r �' _ - INV.(N)= 1.20' \ 11/ _ __ __ __=f -- �,_ r,+ I 5. SITE AREA: INV,(S) =1.20' ��� rIPJ- , :+ ..: A ;/ � �•YI ♦/ III\` l� , - 0,1 "r , I Jr ARC P EL C 11 d / 5 AC. 18,380 SF 0.42 AC. 1 5 440 SF 0.3 00 ( ) f SF 0.00 AC. ru W II,, W ("I'll : �; i• T "; 11. /� 1 'r GRAPHIC SCALE POND 1 20 0 10 20 40 "r ,1 // 1 % TOB EL. = 5.00 O a a U U a A U U A W A GRAPHIC SCALE POND 1 20 0 10 20 40 , IN CO C , tl %,,' i DHW�o EL. = 4.51 IIr GRATE INLET -�� 11 Z I I .;. ,•,:,' _,R 1- /' TOP- •.,..�0' I ' J J' r ' �J?S 30 "F 14125' INSTALL FENCE UNDER RAMP b It/ INV. (S) =-- 1.79' .. ;' I -) :" X20., �0° ALONG ENTRANCE TO INTERIOR �" „ ti. j ,`.., (,),-g t ,r I r�'; _ ; ,„ **"_ POND AREA TO ENSURE ACCESS / ,�� ( 1 '` /, ,_ �, BY AUTO? P RSONNEL ONLr) ;1� )• 2 3 •„ r -- COLUMBIA `� 19_D1 5 ( r �; �� „ ;, ; •• , ��� , .� /STEM r P . B . � I , P `t" l� �- �r / I =1 �� , n,1'� „r t_, k s WA�L l �) O tt I O ' 1 °; ,: t^ ,.y t _ ': }s r " ' STE,t,�,y _ -I PROPOSED EN TRANC EXI T yI <; '' ' _` - • t M �- - ,_,, ". , 9' ?:, _ << ' '; _ GATES TO ALLOW 4 i i MIN. I ($_ I i4�: ,P -, " =f,' 1 ! STACKING LENGTH �' OM GK 0 / 4 ,CJ ,v,A tt- �' " ^:_ _M1'�, ,' `s.�i,i <L•�•`. ;.'�..ti ='1;� 1 �� / C L �_ OF SIDEIiYALK ON H , �ID,E p �E pp 1 =' 1 I f1 - ^ftP. - r 1 � - L GENERAL NOTES: 1. ENGINEER: WATER RESOURCE ASSOCIATES, INC. 4260 W LINEBAUGH AVE TAMPA, FL 33624 PH: (813) 265 - 3130 FAX: (813) 265 - 6610 NOTE: Comprehensive Site Data Table includes information for entire Marbella Project (Parcels A, B and C). Construction Plans enclosed show only improvements proposed for Parcel B Parking Garage modification. 2. SITE LOCATION: NORTH SIDE OF 5TH ST BETWEEN CORONADO DR & HAMDEN DR. PARCEL ID: (PARCEL A) (PARCEL B) 07/29/15/52380/000 /0630 08/29/15/17586/001/0120 07/29/15/52380/000 /1110 08/29/15/17586/001/0130 (PARCEL C) 08/29/15/17586/001/0140 08/29/15/17604/000 /0100 08/29/15/17604/000 /0080 08/29/15/17604/000 /0080 08/29/15/17604/000 /0100 "r A i TOB EL. = 5.00 O a a U U a A U U A W A �11 1b, r` o' TOB AREA= 7376 SF _- f '`' COLUMBIA SUBDIVI -�10i 1 NO. 2 1-_ �; ,;� TOS EL. = 3.50 (nv FEET) 3. PRESENT USE: ���� P.B. 21, PCB 79 ° ' - ,,> , t; ,' _,I',�o J SHW EL. = 2.00 1 in. = 20 ft. 4. DEVELOPED USE: J rf `' .`a.: ;' ; '; :;13 �, FIR t 2" = WEIR INV. 3.88 �r �' , IN CO C , tl %,,' i DHW�o EL. = 4.51 IIr GRATE INLET -�� 11 Z I I .;. ,•,:,' _,R 1- /' TOP- •.,..�0' I ' J J' r ' �J?S 30 "F 14125' INSTALL FENCE UNDER RAMP b It/ INV. (S) =-- 1.79' .. ;' I -) :" X20., �0° ALONG ENTRANCE TO INTERIOR �" „ ti. j ,`.., (,),-g t ,r I r�'; _ ; ,„ **"_ POND AREA TO ENSURE ACCESS / ,�� ( 1 '` /, ,_ �, BY AUTO? P RSONNEL ONLr) ;1� )• 2 3 •„ r -- COLUMBIA `� 19_D1 5 ( r �; �� „ ;, ; •• , ��� , .� /STEM r P . B . � I , P `t" l� �- �r / I =1 �� , n,1'� „r t_, k s WA�L l �) O tt I O ' 1 °; ,: t^ ,.y t _ ': }s r " ' STE,t,�,y _ -I PROPOSED EN TRANC EXI T yI <; '' ' _` - • t M �- - ,_,, ". , 9' ?:, _ << ' '; _ GATES TO ALLOW 4 i i MIN. I ($_ I i4�: ,P -, " =f,' 1 ! STACKING LENGTH �' OM GK 0 / 4 ,CJ ,v,A tt- �' " ^:_ _M1'�, ,' `s.�i,i <L•�•`. ;.'�..ti ='1;� 1 �� / C L �_ OF SIDEIiYALK ON H , �ID,E p �E pp 1 =' 1 I f1 - ^ftP. - r 1 � - L GENERAL NOTES: 1. ENGINEER: WATER RESOURCE ASSOCIATES, INC. 4260 W LINEBAUGH AVE TAMPA, FL 33624 PH: (813) 265 - 3130 FAX: (813) 265 - 6610 NOTE: Comprehensive Site Data Table includes information for entire Marbella Project (Parcels A, B and C). Construction Plans enclosed show only improvements proposed for Parcel B Parking Garage modification. 2. SITE LOCATION: NORTH SIDE OF 5TH ST BETWEEN CORONADO DR & HAMDEN DR. PARCEL ID: (PARCEL A) (PARCEL B) 07/29/15/52380/000 /0630 08/29/15/17586/001/0120 07/29/15/52380/000 /1110 08/29/15/17586/001/0130 (PARCEL C) 08/29/15/17586/001/0140 08/29/15/17604/000 /0100 08/29/15/17604/000 /0080 08/29/15/17604/000 /0080 08/29/15/17604/000 /0100 T �J -) f r '.. t" -4 i,3z_`;..'rs >: '�1 :; =�.<r :'' -y`. _ -1. .� -!' - s,_ I ��-, / 11 E , -,J Ili I i :.. r N kD w I J a,_ a',A", GRATE INLET R. �/• I I ;F E . 4 - gig: I J / 39 8 C #��� rte' ;,, '•'$' '3, _ _ r Q ' =�' - - TO -3.07' T�l r'. '/ P y- rr 1 'i Ef i' :,ts fit. ,' ,.`'1': ^ fi. d: r r .i J,,,.,i: z„X�' ' N �'� _ N /. 1 63' 1 '1 r t N o N "/ - T r. ( ) LSD rt {: r' <:' E o' `r?- y M 1 ;L y4, K� i ��s. A {� C 3 - t t 5 , , :..'. F.. `r' _ ) N j i�` •:k��'aix , f. Hti's _ ;i /f/y♦ nl <j �j t d' ✓h -'• 1 A 1 w: O - 1 J3 - ,' O {' ,'' ! S _ E °1 r' _ " err • �•5�' ) 1 I 11 4 ,� E 11 B1 s,, V = a,: 1 U :l. a O `2' 3 _i+ _ 'A �t I :)_ _ tea, �S�1 - yLL:c - /�� S.J. ;-`_., yi N 1 i �i 1 - - � i� J r r 4' r i y., �r• V d I - . „z 4 �J -, '�2r �.{ ,, %_ t:.n r ;tom, „�, �X r v dJr 0 �., 251 J °1 1• t' ;,. P` x _.i -� &a- '' Ct` \) -1 I <F'rf '�' =���" I 11 p,l'" x w :5 `" 3 :1 L �.r .a'u. "` xw'r ti` S, n J % • =iY L, }e C ''�T•4, � I z•, ` .• ' x R , ;5.,` ". p" ' 1 %4X h c� mot" ^ i A l R .• A U Rix dd �y�� �:1'j Cw- tr'y ?i } ` Y r' _ ;Y a\ ( .E` ,1 S. 9Q` 'r t '4 I.K•r 11 Y:x _ <..,: F,w ' ::, r� " "�� -: mss. _• ie II 016 /I r u" '3 r "`J I'I re+S �� T - a. - b0 w 5- ".'t ' }. a 4 �x b= ['_•(� - {' 1. _ - , tEl 1 �y c. w 1 Eb• ! 1.^ ?ate_ it µ:'i, N,Y }�,.. °; 4. a -. .. I _ i a:''. , f W / _ :w. t� t ' c J 6 x' �y. � r�,s _ 1 0 t `��•- �P ,-j 4 ,= "�° Yak >s'a:' F _ ���x 39 3 7 f a- •>r ..r nu �. > ," ;,. �.; _,� ,_ h u :.t =k . �< 0' E 7� J X 4} Y•• � t U J/ M4 J '7 3 '%lrwr y -'� s ''i• ;, 1 d r- ;� ° � tom, � " ����� -���, -,r t :Rd Gr x 1 a � n.a�_ 1 «•.�..; ='t` i r ; ''w i 1' S - ! ', � , ` .,, r�r � � � 1.01 iL '!�' i . -e'"�; :�:m. '� ;t! €, -t - w -I'" y� / ±+.4:,,•n'' z .y j '`�y"."fi`Fa'- �b,'- _,S' f i l.K 7. ,t ='' ,' qtr Jz411.. ,.ir: a.% --,s - ;' R . k ?ALa', u;t't _ 4. " Ll. ":}_. "�k-' °` G''` zp�� ,x • , t�'„_,. k; c: - #:. �f.- {7" .ice.,, ":' ''v'r ,,. +. • _ . ..e �,J 6"``"s may,„ hii:. - rr'w ^^t^.,, ,z • ., .. 1J PIN e a: 4 I _ - %r- - tv- - r �^ - �x 1 Rc+ �'` S r r_ A !ssr ,��;:,r 1 _ - Y 4 �"` - 4 4 �Y \ -1 • - 176 - .r '.�;' -;; � - .0 ate`, - �' . A f _ <Y• <t 'lam, - •,. t.' i f -t d, - S .�:Fy CUNC Bf � y ry. ' /` Ada •� J r,.i, ' .dl.e + S .'b, a; <v r ,,;;p :�' ti , p 1 1 ,r � J� ,: 'V ltY -' rZ -A,. f..r • i tf ��p t � fi t- 5 F4w` ,f . ,_ , to I 1 �t''r, " fil 1 f� ,�w� �i >� k ,� r rb .•ay..t"h " {'x� "i'i .yam`• ..G � t' - 'n . •. �. •'- ,c` •t = y;',,.` �. <.:•...., a r'�' ,I . t5 U 'c .i �'` h � r • .t.. - .f `SF':Jf ..., ts� .ri, � F+ _ e-t.. - _ tri- A i,_ ::..�zi -. 'r.''r J .f 5 , _ t, s _ t`.• fc 1 - u y,,. ..J k a + �- SCIR iF~.k{pp2 td 3" S P { S' I: S:1•:mi i „f �ir - 4 ,r�,� 3fi" - `h�,r l � - *`ti'i %Sn r •i= r r �C R I '�r' ':<Y„ � � a o i' fF• 'z:' i 1 i� A, - r • '.i `Y /_ ti;,'. jY• > >:`h,` E3 - Y, , s err _ F w�'° � 'Tit ' a %i }r c I - "i / c� a f• 'a = ,,t �. - r 'V FS}v .» Y.' I : 'cj' _ \ p <. } at,M, ,1'yn f Q t f " w"t`t "�" - ate' � �i I n (71 113 i 'C,' sSx b l K •��i CO 7 L; ' CURB INLET ^x, ; :Ii•'•_'. _ 0 ,I 5? 1 Sr, 1' r ,3 'Y: .r -' t : 'sue „:,'�. :n AR "" ['� 1 �i Y: P x.68 0.5` � ,4�" rn TO v a' ''1 L a " /J i1,' I •. 12 - z Jl` {:r p f'�.' p ��� 11 01) t ��} ''s' 3 }:.F :i -Y fI a 1, - - ._r +1 Fi 4 �+ f. 1 - K. U 1 r+ /4 r' - tv ,' �:Y•'r.= �1i.= .,,,"`$iii •! a. - µ3��t 1 L� ' ` -r' - "1-* ;ter "� ` v,'`i'. =trt *f y v' y r r� I - rte .':F`.vi,eg, a,.r �,yY:�';. 1d ,,. Jy_ - o I _ t_ s 4;; 1 _J 1 , S, J Q ,,, d F/ Yf' U) r. -.rY^ - {` "ass �.•. :z: t V s s , vJ _ r -r. a , t w - 7qr }•., ,i•''.. .*� is `) 1 (� '�.r S- i ';K'� rLy,; .rya.. p}.,�,..,3,^, .2r 13 +' .f' vy''- 1 - Lro :^ • H •Ii. `"�i >?%: `� -. ,.=.t:;T.; mss, y, - - - m ,s�'S F ' Li mot'' ' u'"'i °• ` 3 . .'•`.n., , r•'�t , - ^l : a't - P � F'"ryr' � 3 4 `"3 w 3 ;t. l :` Q _ 3' ( 7 tr. e., co- `I -r�1 . � - i , r�� U 7 i .� ' C , +4 r - Z T' �F'u 0 •U �q & 6 s n J , ' fr 4 � o fY, _j t, f•r -.,,2. ag ,>*, -•` `y�,:y °:y;. .,Y�,s o \ Q I I e1 I a,`S.'.. „.,, czes'x`?a -. , ,a,_ . '1, U' r r . q, t �r; k Z °s t 1 •''71• rr'.' - ti 2 11 . °a. ''ski . 410 ',�.: , >,_,.«';,_ b, J Y'' - Y" - '1' U 1: tr1�'- -$3' ' 2 i 4 r.,.i. _ . Etr,,. ,1a P. �' -y f-r � '�r \/ Y I � : T, El L R. y.. , . �, _ �.�t .� r q:l v r., _ �a ' f-%" j \ C th ti ••i '� Q .:SS ...'{ € "tirr2' ,�>nrx''z .,'s. ?' ,`�.c',� „rr A, .y iji ;`` ',s,.. " ;. C "7 7>-. \I '� VU. A. _ :h:' 7 =s 7`-'`d: =:^ t`a G" -•� - .•t,'••.=4- ,,^ >.. ;P, x; ¢a,;y `a, 6 - ay, `x _ , p 1 LANDSCAPE -�,,,, =.u,^ '�rt,� ��. rl' °•: <.r: s:rr`:� °;s: , 7 z a:.. i. ti: i ` I It \ do � �,� ';' ..A t� =x..,, y� = �s ^r »,' %- { „1:'_ l :y,: �,`, .,� ;;,,t / }' .`.;<'_.., * - : . - �.,., PROP �) ` f \ •' ' , , z-rr :z#,ixt:: ?`- . x` `,:,.:';.' ,,,�- "�`�'wi ' h 1'- - _ v 5�j 1 • r I - - -?h:t6 ,; <,z,Iv,,•..,., .., !- :rte;.-- .,-�,:Y•'' �: • <-r:, ' t GSA ti ,� 1 O 14 a� pq M�,. 3 I 2,0 18.0 :4t.,:..=� Hi, "^ , x \\ 'IJfl` x 3, x ,. 6,i. • ♦ O ♦ _ ' i-,t a. -• y :r ,-1 -•' , ".� • 'rj• �, •ij 1 1 7 , I r%;', O O n( Q `;i ..,: iati,:f aiv 57: iY3'a' - • � 4 ; i I :. lr d: rr':.a, r i, N 5772,5 3 �� 1210 `�O 1p' of JP w ♦ n FIR ` ,,�" ' BACK z / � V Q '''trr - ^ 1912 4 17 V.U.A. _� #: >�, ��-� �' � �` / �)� ^ 410 � . � FI_ow � / � r O LANDSCAPE O � ^: 1 $ •.% PREVENTFR '� / � ''� • � 1810 `�j, ° -, Ar rh a Q - ,SLR. !"/ -3. -'t J1 !-? e ,8 j ;f " : I� Q \ , . i'} 8' t •-- =�- •�ING 'a „b AT // r.4 �� i,r •' , 1 P (,� 1 !0; :::; ;: 'r �i � y .. O t =LAY �� 1P -'_� .• .. , r' RI ,�.r, 3; ., .. D 8 DfP' �.. A'._ ` /Ui GF1T-QP_ 51 ,r,.:`' :, co N O U � T R • `! /1 -r '; � q 70or r'`' � + . 7 1•i ' {� 'f-, CV CJ FPK &D c) AT1 R �}✓ r -�✓-__�?*_ _ 110 . . -, n cn CO U �, - Wq rr= 4f - • "' ' M 414 ° o su U Q. U _ _ 1210' �, "' r5 Ca ', tip' " SCREEhI WALL ♦ ,,, O - _ _ .::'� •. �:� „'.,. • °) o y _ a R1315 ' 4 ;. ... ' J w _ � CE t9 �'`J G7 U O r ••. : ^r. 57725' .•1 x(��` y, N N j -y E t Q r` D -=„ �L e 1315 Q -� �: ;.;, : ; +�'' 3p,•E •b2� Z h Tfi� 20 �' 0 ! v FGF e ;> hc, !�' `> TOR1,1 § .. 0 (P -,1' - 4 �� U O p p DY-- r''tA^"- _M1a - _ ,,;t ,/:(7 � :vwJ - t r)`,(11 E ,�'� O i� U.A. .. '�ti_t . ',_� • •�... STO„ •'4' . ',.� - -, 1 '`o " O O 5�tt LANDSCAPE -�` '')'. RIM '- h2A1110,, h�_ z �./, r> Y c, xI d'� `� -) -_, _'1- - k (60,00, -�' ,�, + 4'... '.:' z i - cv ) 1-3 �) _ ?, r ,1,, __ _ _- - (UNDER C Raw (P)) 30" SCREEN WALL a ,4, • t� ' o IF , b FIR 1 ?„ _. A) c 3 'y , o ;, �`! L` C� DOCK jr,SF - - l . rk �, V 1 I flA r __ _ R 1315, .:.: , ,:,C • _ .A -___ _ _ - ti I • - ' ' s r{" '` t1 FIR 1 /2„ CO1V >' I`' Y,'' /.� --` �-� :: -- -__-�._ _ r ,�b 30" SCREEN WALL v� 2a �- ti EL ,cc� fr _ - ? RLS 3035 - -- � C � r+, _.`�__ ��' , -5' ____� , x3 W 3' 2 FLU 2` - S - -_� r 1 _- s.�_ ,,,"�-„ >r 30 r' 2 _`' �ti GRATE INLET �' `� 2 ��� . r r' ___ - !�•'t��;'J4` , t 0 0 (P) _ �� __ ICP -11P ' � \ 1 5�726'3p w - - _� ,� j "(�) :, ~ - `_ ' ` -� - - =r° INV,(N) = -0,�' O 11 10,00' (F)(P) xi a , �_a, r /a.o• 7 1_ guc b a SANITARY MH V Q a � ,/ / (P} W HOLE ~� - _`� - �` t_, INV.(E) =(-1.i V w L '� RIM -2.98' p ___- ,_` -' -. i �_ - ,��__ INV.(V}) -(- 1.68'} - / �_ 4- b of g 2 7 -`r T ''-- �_ U �� r INV.(N) - -4.4: y _� „r (,0(__,UI\,,,t3)1,\ UBDiVI, I0I�I N0. 4 ��- R131r. -_ �- �� k Ifr/ , n /� INv NE cd o"' V �� o °• 1c - I - - -` (�rJ"" --oar "4'rq I `�-_ "-�'- =?b r),4 ei'� _ ! �•--" 'r�l • ( ) - 0. 1 . U �� f- , i_). _ �, P {� JO '� �f, , -12 ^� '�_ -- _� AC / -_ __ ���• pOP 4,� ry 1 INV. SW 4.1 _ �� ( }� {- d - N, ( ) 2.8' %� ,�'��-�- -�� < 7To,p �;�; �� `TORAJ ~ " , >' 0 -- °b ' G\P // J r/ /{ o % Rj . o' 1 y 1° c 2 '_ 1�3 ~-` Rrr,{ - MANFIOL� I -� 4; -- - -�`� =q I 2q' ti o _ ±') 'r A, q2 I'D _,1, x a CCNC I,1 �< �- �) '.- -- _ CtLL of 8 _,�,tirt' �. �l 24 OP ° COtJFLICT `� �, 0 3. {' --�_ F' 3.1 RCA a: v :✓' 3 a N � a'7 A6 -;1\ _-- _� lvpre� I _ _ �1 IIti'I p _ STCRM M V tai} FF t L rs' --� _ � U) >,' - � - __ ' -_la' l RIM =3.61 � 1� � � `�-` _ �t F:r. EL. =6.63' %'Q 1 i _ _RCP( 3 r FCM4 "x4" TOP = -0, c h2°' 2 ;" r. F1..==6.;t)'- i � f) Jr: ' ` SANITARY MH _ tx, /� .y - tit W PIN fz �� I� � j - 2 BOX BOT N L3 ! � 3> o RIM -3,29 I ,,,t- � - FIR 1 2„ 1( -,2 1- -STORY ,r _,' --- ______�_ / I ©w �b °, _`_ I MASONRY - ------ ( ) =(-- ) INV. RI - 3.90' ,2p b Q - -___ � INV. =(- 1.22') x� rr: `~ -... -I =_�_ r 4 Y ' �` - - - --1 _;G_,, #`1-01 z jJ �'`- 522 INV. {NE)( -(- 4.85') ��� ' , /'� rn ✓� v /' INV.(S)- -1.41' 6" CLAY) } �` -_ �'� INV,(S) =(- 4.97') (15 ") C - V - �� l ` j _\ / \. / - 0> / I I I I 1 1 I I/ I CONFLICT MH RIM =3.68' TOP= 1.59'(18 ":L) ., -- --, , / . , , (PARCEL B) 40,546 SF (0.93 AC.) (PARCEL C) 1,381 SF (0.03 AC.) 6. SETBACKS: REQUIRED PARCEL A PARCEL B ! ! 7 FRONT 25.00 WEST I 4.40 SOUTH TO SCREEN WALL 0 15 FR MIN ! ! 15.00 EAST BLDG 33.0 SOUTH TO BUILDING 0.00' TO PVMNT 5.50 ! SOUTH TO PVMNT 11 I l,Y,_.r, i, ,, , ,w j ,c. 4 ' 1 t;- g, . ''si: -' , }':'',;�„ yr` may} I f F ;� °, _ ,J �0 " , ;T (�. "r yr .z '¢i?�!k,;. �'19�M -!''" ,.ate d`�'rs �',,• '' I,:,.�, , '. , t C,�`' l' ` 6i! I i/ , "O." M o ° c oo o W Z 6bo �`° W A = `�' Cn C7 'd CA Cd a Cn E01 Z U U U 2 0 .0 U r p b 10 In W 1; 1� 9� U ti ti 7. 8. 9. ZONING: "T" A 80 � O a a U U a A U U A W A 3. PRESENT USE: OVERNIGHT ACCOMODATIONS 8c MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL. CIO 4. DEVELOPED USE: (PARCEL A) 102 RES. DWELLING UNITS W/ AMMENITIES (CONDOS) (PARCEL B) PROPOSED PARKING GARAGE 10. 5. SITE AREA: (PARCEL A) 61,212 SF (1.41 AC.) T �J -) f r '.. t" -4 i,3z_`;..'rs >: '�1 :; =�.<r :'' -y`. _ -1. .� -!' - s,_ I ��-, / 11 E , -,J Ili I i :.. r N kD w I J a,_ a',A", GRATE INLET R. �/• I I ;F E . 4 - gig: I J / 39 8 C #��� rte' ;,, '•'$' '3, _ _ r Q ' =�' - - TO -3.07' T�l r'. '/ P y- rr 1 'i Ef i' :,ts fit. ,' ,.`'1': ^ fi. d: r r .i J,,,.,i: z„X�' ' N �'� _ N /. 1 63' 1 '1 r t N o N "/ - T r. ( ) LSD rt {: r' <:' E o' `r?- y M 1 ;L y4, K� i ��s. A {� C 3 - t t 5 , , :..'. F.. `r' _ ) N j i�` •:k��'aix , f. Hti's _ ;i /f/y♦ nl <j �j t d' ✓h -'• 1 A 1 w: O - 1 J3 - ,' O {' ,'' ! S _ E °1 r' _ " err • �•5�' ) 1 I 11 4 ,� E 11 B1 s,, V = a,: 1 U :l. a O `2' 3 _i+ _ 'A �t I :)_ _ tea, �S�1 - yLL:c - /�� S.J. ;-`_., yi N 1 i �i 1 - - � i� J r r 4' r i y., �r• V d I - . „z 4 �J -, '�2r �.{ ,, %_ t:.n r ;tom, „�, �X r v dJr 0 �., 251 J °1 1• t' ;,. P` x _.i -� &a- '' Ct` \) -1 I <F'rf '�' =���" I 11 p,l'" x w :5 `" 3 :1 L �.r .a'u. "` xw'r ti` S, n J % • =iY L, }e C ''�T•4, � I z•, ` .• ' x R , ;5.,` ". p" ' 1 %4X h c� mot" ^ i A l R .• A U Rix dd �y�� �:1'j Cw- tr'y ?i } ` Y r' _ ;Y a\ ( .E` ,1 S. 9Q` 'r t '4 I.K•r 11 Y:x _ <..,: F,w ' ::, r� " "�� -: mss. _• ie II 016 /I r u" '3 r "`J I'I re+S �� T - a. - b0 w 5- ".'t ' }. a 4 �x b= ['_•(� - {' 1. _ - , tEl 1 �y c. w 1 Eb• ! 1.^ ?ate_ it µ:'i, N,Y }�,.. °; 4. a -. .. I _ i a:''. , f W / _ :w. t� t ' c J 6 x' �y. � r�,s _ 1 0 t `��•- �P ,-j 4 ,= "�° Yak >s'a:' F _ ���x 39 3 7 f a- •>r ..r nu �. > ," ;,. �.; _,� ,_ h u :.t =k . �< 0' E 7� J X 4} Y•• � t U J/ M4 J '7 3 '%lrwr y -'� s ''i• ;, 1 d r- ;� ° � tom, � " ����� -���, -,r t :Rd Gr x 1 a � n.a�_ 1 «•.�..; ='t` i r ; ''w i 1' S - ! ', � , ` .,, r�r � � � 1.01 iL '!�' i . -e'"�; :�:m. '� ;t! €, -t - w -I'" y� / ±+.4:,,•n'' z .y j '`�y"."fi`Fa'- �b,'- _,S' f i l.K 7. ,t ='' ,' qtr Jz411.. ,.ir: a.% --,s - ;' R . k ?ALa', u;t't _ 4. " Ll. ":}_. "�k-' °` G''` zp�� ,x • , t�'„_,. k; c: - #:. �f.- {7" .ice.,, ":' ''v'r ,,. +. • _ . ..e �,J 6"``"s may,„ hii:. - rr'w ^^t^.,, ,z • ., .. 1J PIN e a: 4 I _ - %r- - tv- - r �^ - �x 1 Rc+ �'` S r r_ A !ssr ,��;:,r 1 _ - Y 4 �"` - 4 4 �Y \ -1 • - 176 - .r '.�;' -;; � - .0 ate`, - �' . A f _ <Y• <t 'lam, - •,. t.' i f -t d, - S .�:Fy CUNC Bf � y ry. ' /` Ada •� J r,.i, ' .dl.e + S .'b, a; <v r ,,;;p :�' ti , p 1 1 ,r � J� ,: 'V ltY -' rZ -A,. f..r • i tf ��p t � fi t- 5 F4w` ,f . ,_ , to I 1 �t''r, " fil 1 f� ,�w� �i >� k ,� r rb .•ay..t"h " {'x� "i'i .yam`• ..G � t' - 'n . •. �. •'- ,c` •t = y;',,.` �. <.:•...., a r'�' ,I . t5 U 'c .i �'` h � r • .t.. - .f `SF':Jf ..., ts� .ri, � F+ _ e-t.. - _ tri- A i,_ ::..�zi -. 'r.''r J .f 5 , _ t, s _ t`.• fc 1 - u y,,. ..J k a + �- SCIR iF~.k{pp2 td 3" S P { S' I: S:1•:mi i „f �ir - 4 ,r�,� 3fi" - `h�,r l � - *`ti'i %Sn r •i= r r �C R I '�r' ':<Y„ � � a o i' fF• 'z:' i 1 i� A, - r • '.i `Y /_ ti;,'. jY• > >:`h,` E3 - Y, , s err _ F w�'° � 'Tit ' a %i }r c I - "i / c� a f• 'a = ,,t �. - r 'V FS}v .» Y.' I : 'cj' _ \ p <. } at,M, ,1'yn f Q t f " w"t`t "�" - ate' � �i I n (71 113 i 'C,' sSx b l K •��i CO 7 L; ' CURB INLET ^x, ; :Ii•'•_'. _ 0 ,I 5? 1 Sr, 1' r ,3 'Y: .r -' t : 'sue „:,'�. :n AR "" ['� 1 �i Y: P x.68 0.5` � ,4�" rn TO v a' ''1 L a " /J i1,' I •. 12 - z Jl` {:r p f'�.' p ��� 11 01) t ��} ''s' 3 }:.F :i -Y fI a 1, - - ._r +1 Fi 4 �+ f. 1 - K. U 1 r+ /4 r' - tv ,' �:Y•'r.= �1i.= .,,,"`$iii •! a. - µ3��t 1 L� ' ` -r' - "1-* ;ter "� ` v,'`i'. =trt *f y v' y r r� I - rte .':F`.vi,eg, a,.r �,yY:�';. 1d ,,. Jy_ - o I _ t_ s 4;; 1 _J 1 , S, J Q ,,, d F/ Yf' U) r. -.rY^ - {` "ass �.•. :z: t V s s , vJ _ r -r. a , t w - 7qr }•., ,i•''.. .*� is `) 1 (� '�.r S- i ';K'� rLy,; .rya.. p}.,�,..,3,^, .2r 13 +' .f' vy''- 1 - Lro :^ • H •Ii. `"�i >?%: `� -. ,.=.t:;T.; mss, y, - - - m ,s�'S F ' Li mot'' ' u'"'i °• ` 3 . .'•`.n., , r•'�t , - ^l : a't - P � F'"ryr' � 3 4 `"3 w 3 ;t. l :` Q _ 3' ( 7 tr. e., co- `I -r�1 . � - i , r�� U 7 i .� ' C , +4 r - Z T' �F'u 0 •U �q & 6 s n J , ' fr 4 � o fY, _j t, f•r -.,,2. ag ,>*, -•` `y�,:y °:y;. .,Y�,s o \ Q I I e1 I a,`S.'.. „.,, czes'x`?a -. , ,a,_ . '1, U' r r . q, t �r; k Z °s t 1 •''71• rr'.' - ti 2 11 . °a. ''ski . 410 ',�.: , >,_,.«';,_ b, J Y'' - Y" - '1' U 1: tr1�'- -$3' ' 2 i 4 r.,.i. _ . Etr,,. ,1a P. �' -y f-r � '�r \/ Y I � : T, El L R. y.. , . �, _ �.�t .� r q:l v r., _ �a ' f-%" j \ C th ti ••i '� Q .:SS ...'{ € "tirr2' ,�>nrx''z .,'s. ?' ,`�.c',� „rr A, .y iji ;`` ',s,.. " ;. C "7 7>-. \I '� VU. A. _ :h:' 7 =s 7`-'`d: =:^ t`a G" -•� - .•t,'••.=4- ,,^ >.. ;P, x; ¢a,;y `a, 6 - ay, `x _ , p 1 LANDSCAPE -�,,,, =.u,^ '�rt,� ��. rl' °•: <.r: s:rr`:� °;s: , 7 z a:.. i. ti: i ` I It \ do � �,� ';' ..A t� =x..,, y� = �s ^r »,' %- { „1:'_ l :y,: �,`, .,� ;;,,t / }' .`.;<'_.., * - : . - �.,., PROP �) ` f \ •' ' , , z-rr :z#,ixt:: ?`- . x` `,:,.:';.' ,,,�- "�`�'wi ' h 1'- - _ v 5�j 1 • r I - - -?h:t6 ,; <,z,Iv,,•..,., .., !- :rte;.-- .,-�,:Y•'' �: • <-r:, ' t GSA ti ,� 1 O 14 a� pq M�,. 3 I 2,0 18.0 :4t.,:..=� Hi, "^ , x \\ 'IJfl` x 3, x ,. 6,i. • ♦ O ♦ _ ' i-,t a. -• y :r ,-1 -•' , ".� • 'rj• �, •ij 1 1 7 , I r%;', O O n( Q `;i ..,: iati,:f aiv 57: iY3'a' - • � 4 ; i I :. lr d: rr':.a, r i, N 5772,5 3 �� 1210 `�O 1p' of JP w ♦ n FIR ` ,,�" ' BACK z / � V Q '''trr - ^ 1912 4 17 V.U.A. _� #: >�, ��-� �' � �` / �)� ^ 410 � . � FI_ow � / � r O LANDSCAPE O � ^: 1 $ •.% PREVENTFR '� / � ''� • � 1810 `�j, ° -, Ar rh a Q - ,SLR. !"/ -3. -'t J1 !-? e ,8 j ;f " : I� Q \ , . i'} 8' t •-- =�- •�ING 'a „b AT // r.4 �� i,r •' , 1 P (,� 1 !0; :::; ;: 'r �i � y .. O t =LAY �� 1P -'_� .• .. , r' RI ,�.r, 3; ., .. D 8 DfP' �.. A'._ ` /Ui GF1T-QP_ 51 ,r,.:`' :, co N O U � T R • `! /1 -r '; � q 70or r'`' � + . 7 1•i ' {� 'f-, CV CJ FPK &D c) AT1 R �}✓ r -�✓-__�?*_ _ 110 . . -, n cn CO U �, - Wq rr= 4f - • "' ' M 414 ° o su U Q. U _ _ 1210' �, "' r5 Ca ', tip' " SCREEhI WALL ♦ ,,, O - _ _ .::'� •. �:� „'.,. • °) o y _ a R1315 ' 4 ;. ... ' J w _ � CE t9 �'`J G7 U O r ••. : ^r. 57725' .•1 x(��` y, N N j -y E t Q r` D -=„ �L e 1315 Q -� �: ;.;, : ; +�'' 3p,•E •b2� Z h Tfi� 20 �' 0 ! v FGF e ;> hc, !�' `> TOR1,1 § .. 0 (P -,1' - 4 �� U O p p DY-- r''tA^"- _M1a - _ ,,;t ,/:(7 � :vwJ - t r)`,(11 E ,�'� O i� U.A. .. '�ti_t . ',_� • •�... STO„ •'4' . ',.� - -, 1 '`o " O O 5�tt LANDSCAPE -�` '')'. RIM '- h2A1110,, h�_ z �./, r> Y c, xI d'� `� -) -_, _'1- - k (60,00, -�' ,�, + 4'... '.:' z i - cv ) 1-3 �) _ ?, r ,1,, __ _ _- - (UNDER C Raw (P)) 30" SCREEN WALL a ,4, • t� ' o IF , b FIR 1 ?„ _. A) c 3 'y , o ;, �`! L` C� DOCK jr,SF - - l . rk �, V 1 I flA r __ _ R 1315, .:.: , ,:,C • _ .A -___ _ _ - ti I • - ' ' s r{" '` t1 FIR 1 /2„ CO1V >' I`' Y,'' /.� --` �-� :: -- -__-�._ _ r ,�b 30" SCREEN WALL v� 2a �- ti EL ,cc� fr _ - ? RLS 3035 - -- � C � r+, _.`�__ ��' , -5' ____� , x3 W 3' 2 FLU 2` - S - -_� r 1 _- s.�_ ,,,"�-„ >r 30 r' 2 _`' �ti GRATE INLET �' `� 2 ��� . r r' ___ - !�•'t��;'J4` , t 0 0 (P) _ �� __ ICP -11P ' � \ 1 5�726'3p w - - _� ,� j "(�) :, ~ - `_ ' ` -� - - =r° INV,(N) = -0,�' O 11 10,00' (F)(P) xi a , �_a, r /a.o• 7 1_ guc b a SANITARY MH V Q a � ,/ / (P} W HOLE ~� - _`� - �` t_, INV.(E) =(-1.i V w L '� RIM -2.98' p ___- ,_` -' -. i �_ - ,��__ INV.(V}) -(- 1.68'} - / �_ 4- b of g 2 7 -`r T ''-- �_ U �� r INV.(N) - -4.4: y _� „r (,0(__,UI\,,,t3)1,\ UBDiVI, I0I�I N0. 4 ��- R131r. -_ �- �� k Ifr/ , n /� INv NE cd o"' V �� o °• 1c - I - - -` (�rJ"" --oar "4'rq I `�-_ "-�'- =?b r),4 ei'� _ ! �•--" 'r�l • ( ) - 0. 1 . U �� f- , i_). _ �, P {� JO '� �f, , -12 ^� '�_ -- _� AC / -_ __ ���• pOP 4,� ry 1 INV. SW 4.1 _ �� ( }� {- d - N, ( ) 2.8' %� ,�'��-�- -�� < 7To,p �;�; �� `TORAJ ~ " , >' 0 -- °b ' G\P // J r/ /{ o % Rj . o' 1 y 1° c 2 '_ 1�3 ~-` Rrr,{ - MANFIOL� I -� 4; -- - -�`� =q I 2q' ti o _ ±') 'r A, q2 I'D _,1, x a CCNC I,1 �< �- �) '.- -- _ CtLL of 8 _,�,tirt' �. �l 24 OP ° COtJFLICT `� �, 0 3. {' --�_ F' 3.1 RCA a: v :✓' 3 a N � a'7 A6 -;1\ _-- _� lvpre� I _ _ �1 IIti'I p _ STCRM M V tai} FF t L rs' --� _ � U) >,' - � - __ ' -_la' l RIM =3.61 � 1� � � `�-` _ �t F:r. EL. =6.63' %'Q 1 i _ _RCP( 3 r FCM4 "x4" TOP = -0, c h2°' 2 ;" r. F1..==6.;t)'- i � f) Jr: ' ` SANITARY MH _ tx, /� .y - tit W PIN fz �� I� � j - 2 BOX BOT N L3 ! � 3> o RIM -3,29 I ,,,t- � - FIR 1 2„ 1( -,2 1- -STORY ,r _,' --- ______�_ / I ©w �b °, _`_ I MASONRY - ------ ( ) =(-- ) INV. RI - 3.90' ,2p b Q - -___ � INV. =(- 1.22') x� rr: `~ -... -I =_�_ r 4 Y ' �` - - - --1 _;G_,, #`1-01 z jJ �'`- 522 INV. {NE)( -(- 4.85') ��� ' , /'� rn ✓� v /' INV.(S)- -1.41' 6" CLAY) } �` -_ �'� INV,(S) =(- 4.97') (15 ") C - V - �� l ` j _\ / \. / - 0> / I I I I 1 1 I I/ I CONFLICT MH RIM =3.68' TOP= 1.59'(18 ":L) ., -- --, , / . , , (PARCEL B) 40,546 SF (0.93 AC.) (PARCEL C) 1,381 SF (0.03 AC.) 6. SETBACKS: REQUIRED PARCEL A PARCEL B ! ! 7 FRONT 25.00 WEST I 4.40 SOUTH TO SCREEN WALL 0 15 FR MIN ! ! 15.00 EAST BLDG 33.0 SOUTH TO BUILDING 0.00' TO PVMNT 5.50 ! SOUTH TO PVMNT 11 I l,Y,_.r, i, ,, , ,w j ,c. 4 ' 1 t;- g, . ''si: -' , }':'',;�„ yr` may} I f F ;� °, _ ,J �0 " , ;T (�. "r yr .z '¢i?�!k,;. �'19�M -!''" ,.ate d`�'rs �',,• '' I,:,.�, , '. , t C,�`' l' ` 6i! I i/ , "O." M o ° c oo o W Z 6bo �`° W A = `�' Cn C7 'd CA Cd a Cn E01 Z U U U 2 0 .0 U r p b 10 In W 1; 1� 9� U ti ti 7. 8. 9. 15.00 ! WEST 12.70' EAST f f 0 -10 SIDE 15.00 f NORTH 14.25 NORTH RTH MIN 15.19 f SOUTH MIN MAX HEIGHT 35' 100 f 8.0 FROM FEMA LINE TO ROOF DECK (PARCEL A PROP. HEIGHT 14 AR E TO HIGHEST = 51.35 f FROM FEMA LINE T PARKING DECK LEVEL (PARCEL B) ) LOT WIDTH: 241.0' MIN. PARCEL A 184.3' MIN. PARCEL B TRASH WILL BE LOCATED WITHIN BUILDING AND PUT ON STREET FOR PICK UP. A /I�l /�� � P-.1 W Fri I.-4 W W O a a U U a A U U A W A CIO 10. 00 EXISTING BUILDING FOOTPRINT AREA: � �•YI ♦/ PARCEL A PARCEL B ARC P EL C 5 AC. 18,380 SF 0.42 AC. 1 5 440 SF 0.3 00 ( ) f SF 0.00 AC. W W N 11. ALL DISTURBED GRAS S WITHIN ROW SHALL BE SODDED. �IM1 a 11 12. PLA WITH CURB SIDEWALK ALL UNUSED DRIVE REPLACED WAYS MUST BE REMOVED 8c RE 8c LANDSCAPING TO MATCH EXISTING H U I-� .. C7 I-4 W o CONDITIONS. W U� W 13. FLOOD ZONE: AE PER FEMA MAP 12103CO102G (EL 12 and 11 NAVD 88) DATED 09/03/2003. -<� P-4 14. SUBMITTED UNDER A SEPARATE PERMIT APPLICATION. A COMPREHENSIVE SIGN PACKAGE WILL BE BM ��__F �A f� 15. ALL SITE LIGHTING WILL BE ATTACHED TO BUILDING. NO FREE STANDING LIGHTING IS PROPOSED. 0I IR 16. THERE ARE NO UTILITY EASEMENTS IDENTIFIED BY THE SURVEY ON THIS PROPERTY. o ti 17. THERE ARE NO ENVIRONMENTALLY UNIQUE AREAS ON SITE. 18. ALL MECHANICAL GATES ARE TO BE PLACED A MINIMUM OF 40 LF FROM THE BACK EDGE OF SIDEWALK. SEE U GATES ON THIS SHEET AND FURTHER DETAILS ON THE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS. h- U n a) 19. SITE DATA TABLE: EXISTING REQUIRED PROPOSED V �� Cn TOTAL SITE AREA PARCEL A 61,212 SF 10,000 SF MIN PARCEL A 61,212 SF Cd .r-, d9 9 ,0 PARCEL B 40,546 SF PARCEL B 40,546 SF UO � TOTAL OPEN SPACE PARCELS A&B 21,791 SF N/A PARCELS A&B 30,242 SF rV O ' > < ,= M � ,-I O 00 M W X A w 01 GROSS FLOOR PARCEL A 91,900 SF (HOTEL) N/A PARCEL A 236,584 SF (CONDO) 4) AREA (USE) PARCEL B 20,755 SF (HOTEL) PARCEL B 131 323 SF PARKING PAR (PARKING) �U .r � � � w o � � 0 � N PARKING SPACES N/A PARCEL A 2 SPACES /UNIT / PARCEL A 187 SPACES On a, ° � I 102 UNITS = 204 SPACES PARCEL B 377 SPACES I � PARCEL B = 0 SPACES 300 FOR CITY ,,���// • a 77 FOR DEVLPER. II-r-I . IMPERVIOUS SURFACE RATIO PARCELS A&B 0.83 0.95 PARCELS A&B 0.86 0 M V W FLOOR AREA RATIO (F.A.R.) N/A N/A N/A INTERIOR LANDSCAPING N/A PARCEL A N/A PARCEL A N/A PARCEL B 642 SF (SEE NOTE A) PARCEL B 1,076 SF ORIGINAL RECEIWD NOTES: AUG 17 2007 (A) 642 SF REQUIRED INTERIOR LANDSCAPING BASED ON 10% OF 6,419 SF V.U.A. PLIO&NGDEPARTMENT Aq OF CLEARWATER ire N N w U a t 'z W U H 0 n 0 N M 00 45 A 0 a U 0 W y U 0 0 N a Iu 3 0 0 a 0 U IRRIGATION NOTES 1. A low volume irrigation system, that provides 100% coverage to all proposed plantings, will be designed and installed by the Contractor. 2. The proposed Irrigation System must meet or exceed al/ applicable City code requirements. (i.e., Back Flow Prevention, Automatic Rain Shutoff Device, etc...) J. Irrigation shop drawings must be submitted and approved by the City prior to the Commencement of work. 4. Irrigation system must be inspected and accepted by City Project Manager prior to installation of mulch. 5. Irrigation as -built drawings, which accurately and clearly identify al/ modification 8%r substitutions, must be submitted prior to final inspection and acceptance. 6. The existing 518" water meter will be utilized for this Irrigation System. 7. The Landscape Contractor must coordinate the placement and power supply for the irrigation control timer with the City and the General Contractor. 8. The following irrigation system components will be utilized, per each manufacturers' specifications. Toro - Netafim TechLine Self Cleaning, Pressure - Compensating Emitter Line HARDIE - Rain dial 6 Station Outdoor Control Timer Richdale - 214APR 1" Electric Valve Am tec - 10" Round Valve Box. LEGEND 20 Vs LI GUS TRUM CRAPE MYRTLE S G WA HlN TONIAN PALM ry•. s V 1 • • • A b MA GN L A O I 0 i e i . 0 s. .o PRESERVED PALM VIBURNUM INDIA HAWTHORN HEI MULCH 3" FROM STEMS 3" MULCH LAYER FERTIUZIR TABLETS As / / SPECIFIED. PLACE UNIFORMLY y\ AROUND ROOT MASS T2, PLANTING SOIL BETWEEN MIDDLE AND / BOTTOM OF ROOT MASS \ ^. \� EXISTING UNDISTURBED SOIL OF ROOTBALL -' SHRUB & GROUNDCOVER PLANTING DETAIL CLEARWATER INDEX No. 905, SH. 1 of Rev. 7/15/99 N.T.S. HARDWOODS DRIP LINE ,:l.' 3 WR -001 IWA 2 LJ 7872s TD ' 3 WR 101 VS PLANTING SCHEDULE QTY. Code Botanical Name Common Name Specifications Tree Species 25 WR Washingtonia Robusta Washingtonian Palm 10' -12' C.T.H. 12 LI Ligerstroemia Indica Crape Myrtle 8' HT. Multi -Trunk 4 MG Magnolia Grandiflora Magnolia ,� 3" MULCH LAYER / / `. 4 LJ Ligustrum Japonicum Tree Ligustrum 8' HT. Multi -Trunk Shrub Species 316 VS JViburnum Suspemsum ISandankwa Viburnum 3 gal; 3' O.C.; 2' HT Goundcover Species 792 RI Raphiolepis Indica India Hawthorn 3 gal; 2.5'0.C. Grass Species 4633 1 TD JTripsacum Dactyloides Fakahatchee Grass Field Measured (SF) 2 Prop. WR I Exis tin g. Palm 3 WR n A A 56 VS _ 0 z` •- }5. r'i, €aL• ''S'�- _ t_Ri, rim. R.,..:,t'_�tr. i.e _ '•I-. - ' 4 Y rT k ;•v +, 't + C ^•1 _yl jrw •tt t 3 WR ray _h :i t �1 gin, =U '4 "7- wa n• eft, Eq :f i - it 222 RI n�. .f f' k _ µ t• t - h pa cfL t ^4 t 4 R M 4 } -;f <. .g. z + 1. y)- fi t z:�''° '�,,;- • Via.,, t' A. J•1 p1 F' 2 Prop. WR �:; zzF s . �� .• �:: , i.; -: ._,., - ,: F:• r,R 7 Existing. Palm IN t � '••t u= air +•. - _ >k 'A ^ t =, = z- •s r.1 }a It e{w� 't� p - f tryi 'j' K ri:{ - ` ,:,,.i,�r "'' s4: •`t =�, •+„`t;`� Fns „V.J ' -1 +. ..,. ,e. r:.e i ._ .i'4'. PS i u� -. _T s- _ . + „. ,.�: ,�,; _,:�= ,l.,,4• �: yr` i ; ���; : �-,., rt 'i; • t._ _ k i 5 Ej.•: R `i x� f 2, t y rsx 3' ` T F i. 4, "i'•" . a i� 'fk i f U � e 1' 16 RI 9 2 MU f 3 + �..r „ Ff * n I 105 RV 30" SCREEN WALL 32 VS, SPECIFICATIONS - WOOD BARRIER 1. MINIMUM RADIUS TO BE PROTECTED: A. HARDWOODS - 2/3 DRIPLINE B, CONIFERS & SABAL PALMS - ENTIRE DRIPLINE. 2. UPRIGHTS - NO LESS THAN 2" X 2" LUMBER. 3. HORIZONTALS - NO LESS THAN 1" X 4" LUMBER. 4. BARRIERS SHALL BE ERECTED AROUND ALL PROTECTED TREES AND PALMS, AND INSPECTED BY CITY REPRESENTATIVE BEFORE CONSTRUCTION BEGINS. 5. UPRIGHT POSTS ARE TO BE AT LEAST 4 FEET IN LENGTH WITH A MINIMUM OF 1 FOOT ANCHORED IN GROUND AND 3 FEET ABOVE GROUND. 6. BARRIERS TO REMAIN IN PLACE UNTIL ALL PAVING, CONSTRUCTION AND HEAVY EQUIPMENT IS OUT OF A. 'THEIR INFORMATION MAY BE OBTAINED FROM THE LAND SOURCE SPECIALIST AT 562 -4741. TREE BARRICADES CLEARWATER INDEX 1 No. 909, SH. 1 of Rev. 4/09/03 N.T.S. PINES DRIP LINE T c.� -. r, .x •t . 1� II i �• x4, !t= "� •4a' fey,, FM' ,f' r 3� t t x 1 i r t t,- y4f g 9.' 1 Y•'o- Y CwY s 5jY x ,t_ e1F F 65. -e 'wT" xt9 "'• 's ifi L x v5 5 1 - .'t• F # # + # •11 #+ +'+ +,+ # # 65 R Ll Rl 85 RI WIA WN 1812 sf TD Exterior Pond Area WEISZ i 2 LL/ 215s TD 60 RI I 27 VS t 4 ,C• t5. fit � r 1 �c 'Fr 1 1 1 m I ,2 r:i IN it f FI. py :aY r �f 3t '_ • I.5 , < ! r �4. w • I F' j n k �� lEt wD 5 r -_ 1 x: 'Ted E��a '_ •- l� I r6l, q VISIBILITY TRIANGLE NOTE: LANDSCAPING AND STRUCTURE PLACED WITHIN VISIBILITY TRIANGLES MY NOT EXCEED 30" IN HEIGHT. TREES PLACED WITHIN VISIBILITY TRIANGLES MUST HAVE A CANOPY ABOVE 8' IN HEIGHT. 4 L/ w o U U O r� N V ° ° N W N w u v OF PALM CABBAGE PALMS MAY BE HURRICANE CUT ALL OTHERS MUST HAVE FRONDS TIED W /BIODEGRADABLE STRAP OR TWINE STRAIGHT AND FREE OF SCARS, BOOTS NOTE: STAKING & GUYING REQUIRED FOR PALM, IF NECESSARY, OR AS DIRECTED BY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. GENERAL \ LANDSCAPE NOTES 1. The Landscape Contractor shall grade planting beds, as required, to provide positive drainage and promote- optimum plant growth. 2. All recommended trees and plant materials will be graded as Nursery Grade No. 1 or better as outlined by the Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services Division of Plant Industr y Grades and Standards for Nursery Plants" 7th Edition 1998 as revised from time to time 7 J. All planting shall be done in accordance ce with the Florida Nurserymen' s P and Grower' rower s 9 Associations approved practices. 4. All plants shall be fertilized with A 9 ri form 20-10-5 5 tab e is as P er the manufacturers specifications in conjunction with note # 5. 5. The planting soil shall be the approximate proportions as follows: 50% sand and 507. organic material consisting o f native P eat well - d e cam osed sawdust , leaf mold and top soil. It shall provide a good pliable and thoroughly mixed medium with adequate aeration, drainage and water - holding capacity. It shall also be free of all extraneous debris, such as roots, stones, weeds, etc. 6. All planting areas shall receive a 3" layer of recycled hardwood log mulch, which is to be watered -in after installation. 7. The plant material schedule is presented for the convenience of the Landscape Contractor. In the event of a discrepancy between the plan and the plant key, the plan shall prevail. 8. Plants shall meet size, container, and spacing specifications. Any material not meeting specifications shall be removed and replaced at the contractor's expense. 9. All tree and shrub locations are subject to change. All locations shall be approved by the City Project Manager prior to planting. 10. The Landscape Contractor shall be responsible for examining fully both the site and the bid documents. Discrepancies in the documents or the actual site conditions shall be reported to the City Project Manager in writing at the time of bidding or discovery. No account shall be made after contract completion for failure to report such condition, or for errors on the part of the Landscape Contractor at the time of bidding. 11. The Landscape Contractor shall be responsible for securing all necessary applicable permits and licenses to perform the work set forth in this plan set and the specifications. 12. Plant material shall be bid as specified unless unavailable, at which time the City Project Manager will be notified by telephone and in writing of intended changes. 13 Any and all questions concerning the plan set and /or specifications shall be directed to the City Project Manager at (727) 562 -4737. 14. There shall be no additions, deletions or substitutions without the written approval of the City Project Manager. 15. The Landscape Contractor shall guarantee, in writing, plant survivability for a period of twelve (12) months from final acceptance by the City Project Manager. 16. All dimensions to be field- checked by the Landscape Contractor prior to landscape material installation. Discrepancies shall be reported immediately to the City Project Manager. 17. All materials must be as specified on the landscape plan. If materials or labor do not adhere to specifications, they will be rejected by the City Project Manager with proper installation carried out by Landscape Contractor at no additional cost. 18. All permits necessary are to be provided by the installing contractor unless otherwise specifically stated in the specifications. 19. No contractor identification signs shall be permitted on the project, except for the project information signs. 20. Existing sod shall be removed as necessary to accomodate new plantings. 21. Any existing sod areas that are unnecessarily disturbed during the landscape installation shall be resodded to match existing. 22. The Landscape Contractor will be responsible for the collection, removal, and proper disposal of any and all debris generated during the installation of this project. ORIGINAL RECEIVED `5!, l tr • r' �x'e,L'�, .,._ t }'�:_•' f • `"yam/ •i +'� t;'' - F• " , i� � may- .. � ,<,. - .t,s,, 1". ",.� °' :. ••• 00 ? /H ,° o, z � �N W A O }Cd to PLANNING DEPARTMENT CIiY OF CLEARWATER Z 5 LAYERS OF BURLAP, 5 - 2 "x4 "x16" WOODEN BATTENS, U CONNECTED WITH 2 -3/4" STEEL BANDS. OR APPROVED ALTERNATE REMOVE BURLAP AND ALL TIE MATERIAL FROM TYHE TOP 1/3 OF ROOTBALL i 2"X4" WOOD BRACE (3 EA, MIN.) w a NAIL TO BATTENS & STAKES U � U Ui WATER RING (6" WIDTH & HEIGHT) PROVIDING A WATER COLLECTION BASIN TILLED AND LOOSENED NATIVE SOIL BACKFILL ' 22N4-06- WOODEN STAKES ( 3 ) o,v�� ,� 3" MULCH LAYER / / `. ROOTBALL � 9 \ \ \��, ., , FERTILIZER TABLETS i > ✓ i , % E G XISTIN UNDISTURBED SOIL AS SPECIFIED. PUCE i UNIFORMLY AROUND ROOT MASS BETWEEN MIDDLE AND BOTTOM � � MIN. 3 TIMES THE WIDTH OF ROOT MASS. OF THE ROOTBALL o PALM PLANTING DETAIL U CLEARWATER INDEX No 904, SH. 1 of 1 Rev. 8/21/06 U N.T.S. GENERAL \ LANDSCAPE NOTES 1. The Landscape Contractor shall grade planting beds, as required, to provide positive drainage and promote- optimum plant growth. 2. All recommended trees and plant materials will be graded as Nursery Grade No. 1 or better as outlined by the Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services Division of Plant Industr y Grades and Standards for Nursery Plants" 7th Edition 1998 as revised from time to time 7 J. All planting shall be done in accordance ce with the Florida Nurserymen' s P and Grower' rower s 9 Associations approved practices. 4. All plants shall be fertilized with A 9 ri form 20-10-5 5 tab e is as P er the manufacturers specifications in conjunction with note # 5. 5. The planting soil shall be the approximate proportions as follows: 50% sand and 507. organic material consisting o f native P eat well - d e cam osed sawdust , leaf mold and top soil. It shall provide a good pliable and thoroughly mixed medium with adequate aeration, drainage and water - holding capacity. It shall also be free of all extraneous debris, such as roots, stones, weeds, etc. 6. All planting areas shall receive a 3" layer of recycled hardwood log mulch, which is to be watered -in after installation. 7. The plant material schedule is presented for the convenience of the Landscape Contractor. In the event of a discrepancy between the plan and the plant key, the plan shall prevail. 8. Plants shall meet size, container, and spacing specifications. Any material not meeting specifications shall be removed and replaced at the contractor's expense. 9. All tree and shrub locations are subject to change. All locations shall be approved by the City Project Manager prior to planting. 10. The Landscape Contractor shall be responsible for examining fully both the site and the bid documents. Discrepancies in the documents or the actual site conditions shall be reported to the City Project Manager in writing at the time of bidding or discovery. No account shall be made after contract completion for failure to report such condition, or for errors on the part of the Landscape Contractor at the time of bidding. 11. The Landscape Contractor shall be responsible for securing all necessary applicable permits and licenses to perform the work set forth in this plan set and the specifications. 12. Plant material shall be bid as specified unless unavailable, at which time the City Project Manager will be notified by telephone and in writing of intended changes. 13 Any and all questions concerning the plan set and /or specifications shall be directed to the City Project Manager at (727) 562 -4737. 14. There shall be no additions, deletions or substitutions without the written approval of the City Project Manager. 15. The Landscape Contractor shall guarantee, in writing, plant survivability for a period of twelve (12) months from final acceptance by the City Project Manager. 16. All dimensions to be field- checked by the Landscape Contractor prior to landscape material installation. Discrepancies shall be reported immediately to the City Project Manager. 17. All materials must be as specified on the landscape plan. If materials or labor do not adhere to specifications, they will be rejected by the City Project Manager with proper installation carried out by Landscape Contractor at no additional cost. 18. All permits necessary are to be provided by the installing contractor unless otherwise specifically stated in the specifications. 19. No contractor identification signs shall be permitted on the project, except for the project information signs. 20. Existing sod shall be removed as necessary to accomodate new plantings. 21. Any existing sod areas that are unnecessarily disturbed during the landscape installation shall be resodded to match existing. 22. The Landscape Contractor will be responsible for the collection, removal, and proper disposal of any and all debris generated during the installation of this project. ORIGINAL RECEIVED `5!, l tr • r' �x'e,L'�, .,._ t }'�:_•' f • `"yam/ •i +'� t;'' - F• " , i� � may- .. � ,<,. - .t,s,, 1". ",.� °' :. ••• 00 ? /H ,° o, z � �N W A O }Cd to PLANNING DEPARTMENT CIiY OF CLEARWATER Z U U U H P-4 U 1. N N w a U � U W .d U U x U ti ti Cd A o . �...( U F-� U U O O O a -N O N o V� 1 1 "o 00 bA M 2 � 83 ;b V. � W Vi �O o o ~U U W O O O N N .-i (V M � �O t- U H P-4 � w a U � U U A Q Cd A o . �...( U F-� U U a -N O N o V� . ° "o 00 bA M A � 83 ;b V. � W Vi aw o o ~U U W N N H N MW I 00 � Q o I� � U r� o a t•� a V/ 5 C� W ° 0 U H � Cd o . �...( Q U E a -N O N o V� . ° "o 00 bA M W � 83 ;b V. � aw o o ~U U tn a N H N O I 00 � Q o � a t•� V/ C� W ire SANITARY MH // RIM =4.14' INV.(N) =1.20' STORM MH INV.(S)= 1.20" RIM =3.93' GRAPHIC SCALE s INV.(N)= -0.15' INV.(S)= -0.05' 20 0 �0 20 ao !D// ( IN FEET) III ro 1 inch = 20 ft. D// ON -SITE TBM #3 EL. =3.26' SANITARY MH RIM =3.45' INV.(N) =0.07' INV.(SW) =0.07' INV.(NW) =1.00' RIM = 3.45 INV.(N) =(- 1.14') IN=O =(- 1.03') T.O.P .O " DIP) SANITARY MH to // x r3� ��Z� �•�� k sn p FIR 1 Z #4 (IN CID C k�kk v C.1 a �1 kyC ASpHA 2 o Or Q0 o U ?Q3� 0 A9 �,P'tN &D c� 01 ' X #4513 / GASH GAS, `GAS orb Ma 3 p ^b k le Ilk. m A A�' FCM 4 "x4" W /PIN oO V � 1�• phi k k kk i CURB INLET g. TOP -A lop a. n� V C) 2 ^ h EL. -5.14 lip INV.(NE)=( 0.17') INV.(E) =(- 0.53') ®�� ® V INV.(S)= (- 0.13') INV.(SW) =(- 0.54') x wA�= `WA>FR� ��R� STORM MH FPK &D RIM =3.36' LB 24 O INV.(N)= (- .025') II s INV.(E) =(- 0.66') INV.(S)= (- 0.61') INV.(W) =(- 0.61') tic'. -----WORM -----fIORM MANHOLE RIM - 3.35.�I �I e SECTION 8 TOWNSHIP 29 SOUTH • RANGE 15 EAST PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA W �o COLUMBIA SUBDIVISION NO. 2 o z P.B. 21, PG 79 0 z 1 cWA71E�R'• r'bo 5t� S77.25'z., "_ CURVE TABLE CURVE LENGTH RADIUS BEARING CHORD C2(F) 54.12 6287.52 N12-16'17 "E 54.12 C2(P) 53.62 6287.52 N1 2-19-55"E 53.62 C3(F) 55.00 6507.52 1 N1 2-16-33"E 55.00 MID) 55.00 6507.52 N12'1633 "E 55.00 FCM4 "x4" II = _ (60.00' CURB STORM MANHOLE '� '� �j �� (UNDER CO /w (Pi) T : e tig Sc RIM - 3.30 i I ,� 02 FIR 1 /2" ��^ NSTRUCTION) r 3�' x ,y. kti yti� �,,,y , IC � � 3 � ASpHq�T GRATE MH RIM =3.31' CONC % °`A R- ` _ S7725'30 "E I` r3 ^� 0 a3• �� S7 220 GRATE INLET '►' `�"V& r INV.(N) (- 0.77') II I I > ar a 7� �6�8e� 0 (P TOP =3.03' INV.(E) ( -0.86) . E 2 ) f/p W � /F FCM4 "x4" INV.(N)= -0.02' INV.(W) (- 0.86') II �� a p rio.o� $ aoc 'O INV. E 1.08' r (P) W /HOLE ()_(- ) �r INV.(W) -(- 1.68') COLUMBIA SUBDIVISION N0. 4� �� �cN�OF ��°" � �` 0% P.B. 27, PG 50 r ?.e ayb 12. Z ^ w'Y gsPHqLT N� e II V A II II oil/ 10ll GRATE INLET TOP =3.50' INV.(S) =1.79' wex I �A . FN / SANITARY MH RIM =3.91' INV.(N) =(- 2.22') /INV.(E)= -0.15' INV.(S) =(- 2.19') S"O"' 5 5 / S7728' 6E (P) FOP •3/4" 10.00' S6 E (F) SEAWALL / �o m / "Y N SANITARY MH / RIM =3.58' INV.(N)= (- 3.54') INV.(E) =(- 1.37') / INV.(S) =(- 3.88') INV.(W) =(- 1.55') / O There are no minimum setback dimensions for this type of zoning. FLOOD. ZONE NOTES By graphic plotting only, this property is in the following Flood Zones: "AE ", having a Base Flood Elevation of 12.0 feet above Mean Sea Level; also "AE ", having a Base Flood Elevation of 11.0 feet above Mean Sea Level, of the Flood Insurance Rate Map, Community Panel No. 12103CO102G, which bears an effective date of September 3, 2003. Zone "AE" is considered to be in Special Flood Hazard Areas. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot 8, 9, and 10 of COLUMBIA SUBDIVISION NO. 3, according to the Plat thereof as recorded in Mat Book 27, Page(s) 46, of the Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida. And Lot 12, 13, and 14, Block A, COLUMBIA SUBdivision NO. 2, according to the plat thereof, recorded in Plat Book 21, Page 79, of the Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida (AKA / 347 &353 Coronado) / NOTE.• 1. TYPE OF SURVEY: TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY 2. DATE OF SURVEY: MAY 22, 2007. 3. SURVEY CREW: SCOTT WILLIAMS and DALE ANDERSON 4. ELEVA$ONS SHOWN HEREON ARE IN FEET AND REFER TO THE NORTH AMERICAN VERTIC{ L DATUM OF 1988. (N.A.V.D.) 5. REFERENCE BENCHMARK IS CITY OF CLEARWATER BENCHMARK NO. G -03, DISC LOCATED ON THE LOADING DOCK AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE U.S. POST OFFICE. ELEVATION = 4.749 6. NO UNDERGROUND INSTALLATIONS OR IMPROVEMENTS HAVE BEEN LOCATED EXCEPT AS SHOWN. 7. THIS SURVEY DOES NOT REFLECT NOR DETERMINE OWNERSHIP. 8. USE Of THIS SURVEY BY ANYONE OTHER THAN THOSE PREPARED FOR WILL BE THE RE -USERS SOLE RISK WITHOUT LIABILITY TO THE SURVEYOR. 9. THERE MAY BE ITEMS DRAWN OUT OF SCALE TO GRAPHICALLY SHOW THEIR LOCATION. 10. ONLY TREES FOUR (4) INCHES AND LARGER DIAMETER AT BREAST HEIGHT (DBH), WERE LOCATED AND SHOWN ON MAP OF SURVEY. 11. BEARINGS HEREON ARE BASED UPON THE WESTERLY RIGHT -OF -WAY LINE OF HAMDEN DRIVE, SAID LINE BEARS N12'34'30 "E, PER PLAT. 12. ALL DISTANCES SHOWN HEREON ARE FIELD MEASURED UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 13. INFORMATION DEPICTING SUB SURFACE UTILITIES BASED ON SURVEY COMPLETED 12/9/04 ADJUSTED TO N.A.V.D. 88 DATUM AND HAS NOT BEEN FIELD VERIFIED. f .,,�eR ��..•IZ a 4;7!! !q jUL 16 2007 ^Iii(0'rCL MdWa9ER � m D W MMQ W W > J� 3'^ �M V♦ 0 V r � N Qo �rj �' � r � O -3 o r6 0 a nw O o� 0 CD L� r O J RIM =4.13 / INV.(N) =(- 1.36') SANITARY MH INV.(S) =(- 1.16') RIMRIM- INV.(N) -( -4.42) INV.(SW) =0.56' INV.(W) =(- 1.29') / INV.(NE)= -0.12' o� INV.(SW) =(- 4.60') CONFLICT BOX cj GRATE INLET O There are no minimum setback dimensions for this type of zoning. FLOOD. ZONE NOTES By graphic plotting only, this property is in the following Flood Zones: "AE ", having a Base Flood Elevation of 12.0 feet above Mean Sea Level; also "AE ", having a Base Flood Elevation of 11.0 feet above Mean Sea Level, of the Flood Insurance Rate Map, Community Panel No. 12103CO102G, which bears an effective date of September 3, 2003. Zone "AE" is considered to be in Special Flood Hazard Areas. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot 8, 9, and 10 of COLUMBIA SUBDIVISION NO. 3, according to the Plat thereof as recorded in Mat Book 27, Page(s) 46, of the Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida. And Lot 12, 13, and 14, Block A, COLUMBIA SUBdivision NO. 2, according to the plat thereof, recorded in Plat Book 21, Page 79, of the Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida (AKA / 347 &353 Coronado) / NOTE.• 1. TYPE OF SURVEY: TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY 2. DATE OF SURVEY: MAY 22, 2007. 3. SURVEY CREW: SCOTT WILLIAMS and DALE ANDERSON 4. ELEVA$ONS SHOWN HEREON ARE IN FEET AND REFER TO THE NORTH AMERICAN VERTIC{ L DATUM OF 1988. (N.A.V.D.) 5. REFERENCE BENCHMARK IS CITY OF CLEARWATER BENCHMARK NO. G -03, DISC LOCATED ON THE LOADING DOCK AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE U.S. POST OFFICE. ELEVATION = 4.749 6. NO UNDERGROUND INSTALLATIONS OR IMPROVEMENTS HAVE BEEN LOCATED EXCEPT AS SHOWN. 7. THIS SURVEY DOES NOT REFLECT NOR DETERMINE OWNERSHIP. 8. USE Of THIS SURVEY BY ANYONE OTHER THAN THOSE PREPARED FOR WILL BE THE RE -USERS SOLE RISK WITHOUT LIABILITY TO THE SURVEYOR. 9. THERE MAY BE ITEMS DRAWN OUT OF SCALE TO GRAPHICALLY SHOW THEIR LOCATION. 10. ONLY TREES FOUR (4) INCHES AND LARGER DIAMETER AT BREAST HEIGHT (DBH), WERE LOCATED AND SHOWN ON MAP OF SURVEY. 11. BEARINGS HEREON ARE BASED UPON THE WESTERLY RIGHT -OF -WAY LINE OF HAMDEN DRIVE, SAID LINE BEARS N12'34'30 "E, PER PLAT. 12. ALL DISTANCES SHOWN HEREON ARE FIELD MEASURED UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 13. INFORMATION DEPICTING SUB SURFACE UTILITIES BASED ON SURVEY COMPLETED 12/9/04 ADJUSTED TO N.A.V.D. 88 DATUM AND HAS NOT BEEN FIELD VERIFIED. f .,,�eR ��..•IZ a 4;7!! !q jUL 16 2007 ^Iii(0'rCL MdWa9ER � m D W MMQ W W > J� 3'^ �M V♦ 0 V r � N Qo �rj �' � r � O -3 o r6 0 a nw O o� 0 CD L� r O J M n- 3 Lv n O = O Y N V Or Z m 3 � 3 � � o 0 U O co LEI LO N 0 D O a- W .- � N o `O N o Q m p I V } i W C _ 0 I ~ W ^ N f�A yo LL' � OD N a,%< QCY. y l v Q C1 tk d°�NZW UyLLCa d cL, a" cEcVl' r; C °a�c. t't o• _ 0. 402 vii ■ a o� cj N Y � ` LO v o r- LO LO W 0 O C) Z w LLJ oo m m m ZO U X V) LLB Q I La A Y a J LL- li N 0 2 Q M n- 3 Lv n O = O Y N V Or Z m 3 � 3 � � o 0 U O co LEI LO N 0 D O a- W .- � N o `O N o Q m p I V } i W C _ 0 I ~ W ^ N f�A yo LL' � OD N a,%< QCY. y l v Q C1 tk d°�NZW UyLLCa d cL, a" cEcVl' r; C °a�c. t't o• _ 0. 402 vii ■ a J Ow F4 Y � ` LO v LO W O C) w LLJ oo W m ZO U X V) LLB Q I La A Y a J LL- 2 Q V) LLJ Q a 0 p O I LL O Q- 0 E/4 v 1 � 00 C 00 L) Q Z:) O 2 n M J 20 15 10 5 0 E* co C) • COLOR MANUFACTURER ce) cv) < cl) • z W_j LL CL SHERWIN WILLIAMS - FLOWER POT - SP46334 0 W: (D cj) < LLJ z z c� 00 0 0 ce) U) c/) W w w cl :) U) Lu C) Lu C� > cc) it <c')z uj 19 0 r-- < LL, c� <CDO( W • ♦ 20 15 10 5 0 E* co COLOR MANUFACTURER ��'SHERWIN WILLIAMS - IVOIRE SW6127 SHERWIN WILLIAMS - ANJOU PEAR - swasi SHERWIN WILLIAMS - FLOWER POT - SP46334 01414y - A 611111111114=1420010i�_ nil 0 ilumi�� ELI 11=11 N 0 OMNI NNN w rw NEW AN 510 101 0 WINE 0" 12' 0" NAVE) 55) Sol= NO — -- fts" -- ------ V, 1i Imo. HEIM Olin 'S' "N' IN IN mom WE I-of" min' VANS FLOOR LONER LANDING FIN - 0— MEN "NO-40=111 1IIIM1MMMMM 11M VIA I- in In 01 A 1 w 1! d MINNIE Ej INS 10 MINE Niglio WIN a 6 0- V-" OWN[ 2 1 j 0 Norm in em Nino SOMEONE ♦ mo WMEN 0 1111. III Wall 011-11101.010111.1. ;. on IMS ONE' on 0 • mom SEE T A W5 some OEM MEN �\' ' 111.� I X I MEN -so #]FA A)MW ENO "Ono low 4-_ �y pit UA I 20 15 10 5 0 E* co COLOR MANUFACTURER ��'SHERWIN WILLIAMS - IVOIRE SW6127 SHERWIN WILLIAMS - ANJOU PEAR - swasi SHERWIN WILLIAMS - FLOWER POT - SP46334 01414y - A 611111111114=1420010i�_ nil 0 ilumi�� I'm 11=11 N 0 rw NEW AN 510 101 WINE 0" 12' 0" NAVE) 55) NO V, ���T FLOOR LONER LANDING • • 20 15 10 5 0 E* co 001 SOUTH ELEVATION @ FIFTH STREET jUL 16 2007 Klll� Q�) KEY PLAN I CERTIFY TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE THAT THE DRAWINGS & SPECIFICATIONS COMPLY WITH THE APPLICABLE MINIMUM BUILDING CODES JOB NO 0702 ISSUE DATE JULY 16, 2007 I��J COLOR MANUFACTURER ��'SHERWIN WILLIAMS - IVOIRE SW6127 SHERWIN WILLIAMS - ANJOU PEAR - swasi SHERWIN WILLIAMS - FLOWER POT - SP46334 01414y - A 611111111114=1420010i�_ 001 SOUTH ELEVATION @ FIFTH STREET jUL 16 2007 Klll� Q�) KEY PLAN I CERTIFY TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE THAT THE DRAWINGS & SPECIFICATIONS COMPLY WITH THE APPLICABLE MINIMUM BUILDING CODES JOB NO 0702 ISSUE DATE JULY 16, 2007 I��J 761-2-1 (641-2" NAVD 88)ijll 761-211 (641-211 NAVD 88),,L TOP OF PIP ROOF 'Y TOP OF PIP IZM;r V MATERIAL COLOR SCHEDULE COLOR MANUFACTURER SHERWIN WILLIAMS - IVOIRE SW6127 SHERWIN WILLIAMS - FLOWER POT - SV46334 124; 4 4 Kgt*l FORAW.251no I rorol ZT01 OL VA, I iprod 5 -Ipyr: a m ( ) KEY PLAN I , I 07 Z, JOB NO 0708 ISSUE DATE 1 , co co) cl) oC CO O Z _j w u- uw w 0 ry < wa:, < 1c, w Z L ic� 000 0 0 c o 'co" co fn %R .f C%j w W F- F- 1 C,; Ljj U- co) > cs, Wrc> Dclool L— W c� I > mp� 0 < C) z WTo 2 0 E— F:r- r,,-. i= -Fot,-g r r% luj�- G o z co wc�oo ,o < Lc) X- W 0- W MATERIAL COLOR SCHEDULE COLOR MANUFACTURER SHERWIN WILLIAMS - IVOIRE SW6127 SHERWIN WILLIAMS - FLOWER POT - SV46334 124; 4 4 Kgt*l FORAW.251no I rorol ZT01 OL VA, I iprod 5 -Ipyr: a m ( ) KEY PLAN I , I 07 Z, JOB NO 0708 ISSUE DATE 1 , 20 15 io 5 0 A MATERIAL COLOR SCHEDULE COLOR MANUFACTURER SHERWIN WILLIAMS — IVOIRE — SN6127 SHERWIN WILLIAMS — ANJOU PEAR — SN6381 'SHERWIN WILLIAMS — FLOWER POT SW6534 SHERWIN WILLIAMS — EXTRA WHITE SW7006 El;:1;4 4KS_f*j lX*j :41 _r*lAj 3101 co w NORTH ELEVATION EM M 1 IBM 4001 M-1 V I CERTIFY TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE THAT THE DRAWINGS & SPECIFICATIONS COMPLY WITH THE APPLICABLE MINIMUM BUILDING CODES JOB NO 1702 rr SHEET WIVIBER A2.3 C) co 0 cr) ce) c/) • z Lu _j LL a: re- I Lu F- 0 w r y ul I- Z Z-jc� 0 —C> w 04 wwr- 1-- W 0 5 C7) ju)0; Uj LL V) C> > S ZE q , > it < 23 z W:90 cr IN • < 2 -i LLJ OZS2 d Cl • (D U-) Lm 0- M I CERTIFY TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE THAT THE DRAWINGS & SPECIFICATIONS COMPLY WITH THE APPLICABLE MINIMUM BUILDING CODES JOB NO 1702 rr SHEET WIVIBER A2.3 0 tV a: • lul. cc w I-- cr • W a s d co Lm co La > CIO z 0 c a: 0 ui ui to I CERTIFY TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE THAT THE DRAWINGS & SPECIFICATIONS COMPLY WITH THE APPLICABLE MINIMUM BUILDING CODES JOB NO 1702 rr SHEET WIVIBER A2.3 0 tV a: I CERTIFY TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE THAT THE DRAWINGS & SPECIFICATIONS COMPLY WITH THE APPLICABLE MINIMUM BUILDING CODES JOB NO 1702 rr SHEET WIVIBER A2.3 20 15 10 5 0 IN co Cl (o COLOR MANUFACTURER co < WILLIAMS U) 0 z W-j LL n 7) w F- o .j U)<O W f- Z z L) CC) 0 co CUR —C) co 04 F— F- W U) LLI LL Cl) C. C� 5 wc� > O<m'z o Q) C) z U) c� o c) Lf) w 20 15 10 5 0 IN co COLOR MANUFACTURER SHERWIN WILLIAMS - IVOIRE SW6127 SHERWIN 0 - ANJOU PEAR - SW63BI .j S14ERWIN WILLIAMS - LL w Q) Cc • w co .j Q CIO Lm a$ w 0 > cr 0 co m mm�d z 0 Lm cu 0 am w w cr. 20 15 10 5 0 IN co EP-144P—proilrol wi EAST ELEVATION @ HAMIDEN DRIVE 0 KEY PLAN MR CI Pfe COLOR MANUFACTURER SHERWIN WILLIAMS - IVOIRE SW6127 SHERWIN WILLIAMS - ANJOU PEAR - SW63BI S14ERWIN WILLIAMS - FLOWER POT - SW6534 EP-144P—proilrol wi EAST ELEVATION @ HAMIDEN DRIVE 0 KEY PLAN MR CI Pfe I CERTIFY TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE THAT THE DRAWINGS & SPECIFICATIONS COMPLY WITH THE APPLICABLE MINIMUM BUILDING CODES ISSUE DATE JULY 16, 2007 Ild I CERTIFY TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE THAT THE DRAWINGS & SPECIFICATIONS COMPLY WITH THE APPLICABLE MINIMUM BUILDING CODES ISSUE DATE JULY 16, 2007 1G1 ^11 _ nr-1 _Intl Y 04< Lu ca W w N i in Lu Q O Q 0 0 v lozQ o In mew N FIFTP STREET ARCHITECTURAL SITE FLAN 20 15 10 5 0 10 20 30 $ GROUND LEVEL PLAN SCALE: 0 a 10' -0" SINGLE BARREL TRASH RECEPTACLE STORAGE. SINGLE BARREL TRASH PICK -UP AREA NOTE 1 (9- 14 PARKING SPACES AT GROUND LEVEL TO BE DESIGNATED FOR MARBELLA CONDOMINIUM WITH SINGLE AT EACH SPACE. ALL OTHER PRIVATE PARKING SPACES ON GROUND FLOOR TO BE INDIVIDUALLY METERED. NOTE 2 ALL WALLS SHALL NAVE FINISHES WHICH ARE RESISTANT TO WATER DAMAGE. NOTE 3 ALL EQUIPMENT SHOWN SCHEMATICALLY TO ILLUSTRATE 40' -0" STACKING REQUIREMENTS. FINAL EQUIPMENT SELECTION AND LOCATION TO BE INCLUDED IN CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENT PHASE OF PROJECT. NOTE 4 POLE MOUNTED BACK -UP MIRROR. TO BE LOCATED V -6" A.F.F. WITHIN LIMITS OF ISLAND SO THAT A VAN DRIVER CAN SEE VEHICLES ON THE RAMP FROM THEIR REAR VIEW MIRROR ON DRIVERS SIDE. NOTE 5 POLE MOUNTED SIGN STATING "USE MIRROR MOUNTED ON ISLAND WHEN BACKING ". L.LI Q Q 1 ORIGINAL RECEIVED AUG 03 2007 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER GARAGE DATA STANDARD PARKING STALL = 356 HANDICAP PARKING STALL = S HANDICAP VAN PARKING STALL = 2 EXTERIOR PARKING STALL = 11 TOTAL PARKING STALL = 377* APPROX. GARAGE AREA = 1371564 SF AREA PER PARKING STALL = 376 SF *TURN AROUND SPACE ON 6TH LEVEL PLAN IS NOT INCLUDED IN TOTAL PARKING STALL COUNT. r REVIISIONS A 1 AUG % 2007 2 3 4 5 110 OEM so ,mME Im OF QM 1=01oNW.W PAW OF MW= Uff "m ow mm a1ouP. FTO THE BEST OF EDGE THAT THE & SPECIFICATIONS ITH THE APPLICABLE MINIMUM BUILDING CODES JOB NO 0702 DRAWN BY RJF ISSUE DATE JULY 116, 2007 SHEET NUNBER A0.1 0 co M M Q z WO U. (L > Uw >a o cf)Qc W N Z zJ � 0 �vM I U) �ON UJ EW." p coM > C UQ Mz Q ��NO = J W I- �it (r Lo QaLLJ FTO THE BEST OF EDGE THAT THE & SPECIFICATIONS ITH THE APPLICABLE MINIMUM BUILDING CODES JOB NO 0702 DRAWN BY RJF ISSUE DATE JULY 116, 2007 SHEET NUNBER A0.1 d • LL Lu Ow CIO ui 0 I 0)0 •� ca • co to FTO THE BEST OF EDGE THAT THE & SPECIFICATIONS ITH THE APPLICABLE MINIMUM BUILDING CODES JOB NO 0702 DRAWN BY RJF ISSUE DATE JULY 116, 2007 SHEET NUNBER A0.1 d FTO THE BEST OF EDGE THAT THE & SPECIFICATIONS ITH THE APPLICABLE MINIMUM BUILDING CODES JOB NO 0702 DRAWN BY RJF ISSUE DATE JULY 116, 2007 SHEET NUNBER A0.1 CLEAR. EXCEPT WHERE VAN SECOND L LV E L PLAN ACCESSIBLE PARKING. SCALE: 1/8" 1' -0" 20 15 10 5 0 10 20 30 6 2007 REVISIONS A 1 2 3 4 5 M Omar AM 7119E WXM NE 7M PAOMM OF CM W= =W. 110 FM OF na W= WY E NfPRO0 M W171101R MM VOM POW=" "m OW DE.'9GN aaouP. a I CERTIFY TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE THAT THE DRAWINGS & SPECIFICATIONS COMPLY WITH THE APPLICABLE MINIMUM BUILDING CODES JOB NO 0702 DRAWN BY RJF ISSUE DATE : JULY 16, 2007 SWET NUMBER O m ti M M Q 0 U cn o z W - CL >w OC a Wo � 0 fn � o " Z zUco CD _ co u) (n cA�N W Lu 0 Qzo�O M -Jwu.o �t O ocol O A W N U¢Mz �NO L t% ti T QD 5= .L IJLu ui LL u') r = Qn.� co a I CERTIFY TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE THAT THE DRAWINGS & SPECIFICATIONS COMPLY WITH THE APPLICABLE MINIMUM BUILDING CODES JOB NO 0702 DRAWN BY RJF ISSUE DATE : JULY 16, 2007 SWET NUMBER r • U. r Lu QD 5= ,.. ui co uf 00 Rq - � i • an ots LLJ cc co tc) a I CERTIFY TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE THAT THE DRAWINGS & SPECIFICATIONS COMPLY WITH THE APPLICABLE MINIMUM BUILDING CODES JOB NO 0702 DRAWN BY RJF ISSUE DATE : JULY 16, 2007 SWET NUMBER I CERTIFY TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE THAT THE DRAWINGS & SPECIFICATIONS COMPLY WITH THE APPLICABLE MINIMUM BUILDING CODES JOB NO 0702 DRAWN BY RJF ISSUE DATE : JULY 16, 2007 SWET NUMBER Lo 1 _1 to 1 :20'-10" 221-211 26' —O" 261-011 :261-011 261-01' 221-211 20' -10" r 111,411-1,41-1 mr_lwr11 yr i —v CLEAR. EXCEPT WHERE VAN ACCE551BLE PARKING. TYPICAL LEVEL PLAN (3RD 7HRU 5TH SCALE: 1/8" = 1' -0" 20 15 10 5 0 Lei 30 el. jolt' . 4. JUL 16 2007 REVISIONS Q 1 2 3 4 5 7W M= AID THM W== AN TM Pf10P W OF OW DEWN OPAP 110 PARE OF 7M ti= WlY BE fiiPR0M= rffM f MM WM PMEMN R m WA DESal CR". I CERTIFY TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE THAT THE DRAWINGS & SPECIFICATIONS COMPLY WITH THE APPLICABLE MINIMUM BUILDING CODES JOB NO 0702 DRAWN BY RJF ISSUE DATE JULY 16, 2007 SHEET NUMBER A1.2 0 co t` M M Q O z d Wo LL 0- U w �Q 0 .- co uull Z N �Uco 0 `� (n co WF-~ 0 ) � 05 M W u- M � ca:) aO� �WN U¢Mz Oca QD J LV H NN O 1 Soo arils I CERTIFY TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE THAT THE DRAWINGS & SPECIFICATIONS COMPLY WITH THE APPLICABLE MINIMUM BUILDING CODES JOB NO 0702 DRAWN BY RJF ISSUE DATE JULY 16, 2007 SHEET NUMBER A1.2 co d • U. wk cc .1 QD , F co.. .j ,% 12= ca La (; 1 a a: 0 as :'::... • -o. • CL ui cc co Lo I CERTIFY TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE THAT THE DRAWINGS & SPECIFICATIONS COMPLY WITH THE APPLICABLE MINIMUM BUILDING CODES JOB NO 0702 DRAWN BY RJF ISSUE DATE JULY 16, 2007 SHEET NUMBER A1.2 co d I CERTIFY TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE THAT THE DRAWINGS & SPECIFICATIONS COMPLY WITH THE APPLICABLE MINIMUM BUILDING CODES JOB NO 0702 DRAWN BY RJF ISSUE DATE JULY 16, 2007 SHEET NUMBER A1.2 201-101, 221-211 261-011 20 —0" -• • :261-011 2(0' -0" 221-211 20'-10" CLEAR. EXCEPT WHERE VAN ACCESSIBLE PARKING. 51 XT L F-Y F- L P LAN SCALE: 1/8" - 1' -0" 20 15 10 5 0 m 20 30 6 REVISIONS A 1 2 3 4 5 7M W= MV'PM MMM AM 7W PFWMW Or " DEM MW. W FM OF 7MS MafCC w BE ROM= N7QW MM pIOREM PE7UMN fm ammmmr. I CERTIFY TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE THAT THE DRAWINGS & SPECIFICATIONS COMPLY WITH THE APPLICABLE MINIMUM BUILDING CODES JOB NO 0702 DRAWN BY RJF ISSUE DATE JULY 16, 2007 SHEET NUMBER A1.3 0 (0 ti M co Q Z Wo (L > U w >a 0 Woo C� 0) " z()00 'Z co cuo) v �QN W ~~ W Q ONYO a M -j WL-o � O aO�(0 UQMz C4 H 0� 0 =JW� QD NOO(D LLLL Q� O ui a..w- I CERTIFY TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE THAT THE DRAWINGS & SPECIFICATIONS COMPLY WITH THE APPLICABLE MINIMUM BUILDING CODES JOB NO 0702 DRAWN BY RJF ISSUE DATE JULY 16, 2007 SHEET NUMBER A1.3 • LL uj QD 0) ui cu .j ca kt a co Ulm (. ..I ff R > , j •. ca_.._ 0 co 0 1 0 am Lu cc to I CERTIFY TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE THAT THE DRAWINGS & SPECIFICATIONS COMPLY WITH THE APPLICABLE MINIMUM BUILDING CODES JOB NO 0702 DRAWN BY RJF ISSUE DATE JULY 16, 2007 SHEET NUMBER A1.3 HEIGHT ABOVE ELEVATION FEMA BFE ABOVE SEA )F 12' NAVD 88 LEVEL (NAVD 88) 6q.77 81.77' , 61.77' 73.77' ACTUAL BUILDING HEIGHT ABOVE F.F. ELEVATION 761-211 TOP OF HIP ROOF 65'-2" BOTTOM OF FACIA 50.10' 62.10' 50-611 TOP OF WALL 46.10' 58.10' 521- 0 01 6TH FLOOR LOWER LANDING 35.60' 25.10' 14.60' -6.40 20 47.60' 37.10' 26.60' 16.10' 421-011 5TH FLOOR LOWER LANDING 4TH FLOOR LOWER LANDING 211-011 3RD FLOOR LOWER LANDING 101-01 2ND FLOOR LOWER LANDING 5.60' 01-011 1ST FLOOR LOWER LANDING 15 10 5 0 [r MATERIAL COLOR SCHEDULE COLOR NUMBER COLOR MANUFACTURER #1 Z 514ERWIN WILLIAMS - IVO1RE - SW6127 #2 S14ERWIN WILLIAMS - ANJOU PEAR - SW6381 #3 OC (� 5HERWIN WILLIAMS - FLOWER POT - SW6334 #4 0 5HERWIN WILLIAMS - EXTRA WHITE - SW7006 *5EE COLOR BOARD AND COLORED ELEVATIONS 46 HEIGHT ABOVE ELEVATION ACTUAL BUILDING FEMA BFE ABOVE SEA HEIGHT ABOVE OF 12' NAVD 88 LEVEL F.F. ELEVATION (NAVD 88) 6q.77' 81.76' 76' -2" TOP OF HIP ROOF 61.77' 73.76' 681-21111% TOP OF ELEV. MECN. SPACE a PRE -CAST CONCRETE _ COLUMN. COLOR #1 46.10' 58.10' 52' -6" °0 Cu Iw F.F. ELEV. mon iiiiG iiiNG ■_ ■_ ■_ ■_ ■_ ■_ ■_ ■_ ■_ ■_ - -■■■■■ ■ ■ ■ ■■ ■ ■ ■ ■■ ■ ■ ■ ■■ 30 ICI WEST" ELEVATION @ CORONADO DRIVE SCALE: 1/8" a 1' -0" STANDING SEAM METAL ROOF. ROOF COLOR TO MATCH COLOR #3. E.I.F.5. DETAIL COLOR #11214 PAINTED ALUMINUM MULLIONS (NO GLAZING) COLOR #3 LOBBY GLASS W 1 NDOW SYSTEM. COLOR #3 E.I.F.S. DETAIL COLOR #1, 214 PRE -CAST CONCRETE SPANDREL PANEL COLOR #1 DECORATIVE CONCRETE WITH REVEALS COLOR #3 PAINTED CONCRETE WITH REVEALS T, COLOR #2 LOBBY GLASS WINDOW SYSTEM. COLOR #3 ALUMINUM TUBE TRELLIS. COLOR # 3 E.I.F.S. DETAIL I r�l 1 Fj_1 COLOR #4 PAINTED ALUMINUM MULLIONS (NO GLAZING) COLOR #3 G.F.R.C. DECORATIVE PANEL. COLOR #2 * 3 LOBBY GLASS WINDOW SYSTEM. COLOR #3 PAINTED ALUMINUM MULLIONS (NO GLAZING) COLOR #3 12" PROJECTED E.I.F.S. SYSTEM COLOR #2 STOREFRONT DOOR WITH llTl�m SIDELIGHTS AND TRANSOM. COLOR #3 IA (b KEY PLAN ORIGINAL RECEIVED AUG 03 2007 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER REVISIONS Q 1 AUG 1, 2007 2 3 4 5 Tm DEVON"mm mmm ME w PROP m OF GM DEVON I.MM NO FM OF nu wax W De REARODIM WMVff PWOR WW M PFMMM fm am DE91pi omm. d I CERTIFY THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE THAT THE DRAWINGS & SPECIFICATIONS COMPLY WITH THE APPLICABLE MINIMUM 13UILDING CODES j JOB NO 0708 DRAVYIN BY RJF ISSUE DATE JULY 116, 2007 SHEIET NUMBER 0 co r M M Q Z Lu_j Uw WAS OC (� w'` Z 2000 0 `) U) �oN WWti Q M J w u- o > o m Ua °z a ���o (D� w000 ,1, .j 0 d I CERTIFY THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE THAT THE DRAWINGS & SPECIFICATIONS COMPLY WITH THE APPLICABLE MINIMUM 13UILDING CODES j JOB NO 0708 DRAVYIN BY RJF ISSUE DATE JULY 116, 2007 SHEIET NUMBER • U. r (D� ,1, .j 0 m O ur • cc; �_____ _ cr. • Lu i d I CERTIFY THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE THAT THE DRAWINGS & SPECIFICATIONS COMPLY WITH THE APPLICABLE MINIMUM 13UILDING CODES j JOB NO 0708 DRAVYIN BY RJF ISSUE DATE JULY 116, 2007 SHEIET NUMBER E.I.F.S. DETAIL COLOR #4 PRE -CAST CONCRETE SPANDREL PANEL COLOR #1 ALUMINUM TUBE TRELLIS COLOR #3 G.F.R.C. DECORATIVE PANEL. COLOR #2 * 3 V L • � r 20 15 10 5 V A 20 MATERIAL COLOR SCHEDULE COLOR NUMBER COLOR MANUFACTURER #1 d SHERWIN WILLIAMS - IVOIRE - SW6127 #2 a SHERWIN WILLIAMS - ANJOU PEAR - SW6381 #3 1.1. V SHERWIN WILLIAMS - FLOWER POT - SW6334 #4 SHERWIN WILLIAMS - EXTRA WHITE - SW7006 *5EE COLOR BOARD AND COLORED ELEVATIONS 30 PRE -CAST CONCRETE COLUMNS. COLOR #2 NORTH ELEVATION SCALE: 1/8" = P -0" r `"' PAINTED ALUMINUM ULLIONS (NO GLAZING) COLOR #3 101 ImimimII - 1�1 0 O i ACTUAL BUILDING ELEVATION HEIGHT ABOVE HEIGHT ABOVE ABOVE SEA FEMA BFE F.F. ELEVATION LEVEL OF 12' NAVD 88 (NAVD 88) 031-011 TOP OF WALL 68.60' 56.60' 57' -9" 63.35' 51.35' 6TH FLOOR UPPER LANDING 521-611 58.10' 46.10' 6TH FLOOR LOWER LANDING 421-011 5TH FLOOR LOWER LANDING 311-61, 4TH FLOOR LOWER LANDING 211-011 3RD FLOOR LOWER LANDING 101-61, 2ND FLOOR LOWER LANDING 01-011 1ST FLOOR LOWER LANDING U 47.60' 37.10' 26.60' 16.10' 5.60' (b KEY PLAN 35.60' 25.10' 14.60' 4.10' NIm, rm ORIGINAL RECEIVED AUG 03 2007 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER REVISIONS A 1 AliCi 1, 2007 2 3 4 5 TM MM AN) nOE CRlr M uW TW pi0rcmr «o� mw E RuFm m "lu f PWR Mam" PEamm "m a" 067iN Gow. JOB IVO : 0702 DRAVIJN BY RJF ISSUE. DATE JULY 16, 2007 SHEET NUNIBER A2.3 O (o ti M M Q 0 d It Z Wo a • w 1.1. V � (1)~ p 6 ti z V N 00 Co c cj) �N wFW-.~ Q OcoY a M M _IjLL 0 o i Ica m DRAWINGS & SPECIFICATIONS COMPLY INITH THE APPLICABLE Wa`4o MINIMUM BUILDING CODES �wl- QL =W �aO� JOB IVO : 0702 DRAVIJN BY RJF ISSUE. DATE JULY 16, 2007 SHEET NUNIBER A2.3 v a a • ti r I CERTIFY TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE THAT THE DRAWINGS & SPECIFICATIONS COMPLY INITH THE APPLICABLE MINIMUM BUILDING CODES r tom; i 1 � tom, ;i r JOB IVO : 0702 DRAVIJN BY RJF ISSUE. DATE JULY 16, 2007 SHEET NUNIBER A2.3 v a a ti I CERTIFY TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE THAT THE DRAWINGS & SPECIFICATIONS COMPLY INITH THE APPLICABLE MINIMUM BUILDING CODES JOB IVO : 0702 DRAVIJN BY RJF ISSUE. DATE JULY 16, 2007 SHEET NUNIBER A2.3 ORIGINAL RECEIVED AUG 031007 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CRY CLEARWATER LUCCA DEVELOPMENT, D veloper: LUCCA DEVELOPMENT LLC 9011 SOUTH NATOMA AVENUE OAK LAWN, ILLINOIS 60453 ORIGINAL RECEIVED AUG 15 2007 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER I ri ENGINEERING Engineering Solutions 10125 E. COLONIAL OR., SUITE 212 OCOHH, FLORICA 3476'1 TEL:HOO- 738 -0525 FAX.-(407) 517 -4140 VWVW.OROUNOFL.COM 0A020018 ORIGINAL RECEIVED AUG 15 2007 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER SITE PLAN SCALE: 1/20" = 1' -0" NORTH N aQ1 - 20 40 80 1 (00 240 / / / / / I 0 1 •I- I�� THIS PROPERTY LINES WITHN FLOOD ZONE 'VE' AS DEPICTED ON FEMA FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP NO 12103WMG (ELEV. 13) DATED. SEPTEMBER 3, 2003. ORIGINAL RECEIVED AUG 15 2007 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER Cc 0 0 Z 0 cc ENGINEERING Englnaaring acAutlons 10128 E. COLONIAL CR., BUTTE 212 OCOEE. FLO RIGA 3.-L791 TEL800-796.0626 FA>L -(407) 617.4140 WWW.OROUNCFL.COM CAM 6018 JOB NO.: TAMP 63 -01 TL: L.Z CLIENT Client Name L —i DESIGNED BY: GARRY W. VERMAAS DRWN: DATE 11 -06 -06 CHKD: DATE GWV 11 -06 -06 SEAL 11 -06 -06 G. VERMAAS PhD PE FL PE 61163: ACAD DWG PROJ TAMP: 63 -01 SHEET OF A1.01 Qj �Z 0� �o W W mZ o �LL J >m NQ f� W. w U CLIENT Client Name L —i DESIGNED BY: GARRY W. VERMAAS DRWN: DATE 11 -06 -06 CHKD: DATE GWV 11 -06 -06 SEAL 11 -06 -06 G. VERMAAS PhD PE FL PE 61163: ACAD DWG PROJ TAMP: 63 -01 SHEET OF A1.01 041 ow 0 28' -4" -1111 • 4 * ' ' °'• d a • ° •..a ° . °., d .. ° ° p: °d'.. F G H J • �• ..,• •• � •• • • L. d° , A :FOUNTAIN 'd . Id.. 4.4 00 15' -8" 17' -2" 27' -0" 17' -10" 19' -4" A. • ' ' ' v 4 -0" . A. 19' -4" 17' -10" D A .. d M :° ; �, d • OP N ARCADE PORTICO X e' - m -i e 0 27' -0" 17' -2" 16-5" STORAGE 1 2 100 I I A I I b - "r1 ' LEGEND 0 a NUMBER PARKINGS SPACES 54 0 a 0 a 0) 0 CL 130 b 6) 131 146 0) 147 N op N I I NUMBER HANDICAPPED SPACE 6 I I I I I I I LOBBY I I I I I N /11■ 19' -0" 24' -0" 19' -0" = a �i NUMBER OF VAN SPACES 1 19' -0" 24' -0" 19' -0" TATAL NUMBER OF SPACES 61 0 a � 132 145 129 a 148 � - - - - - - - 3 WALKWAY WALKWAY �' �' 149 128 � � 0 , di I I I I I I I I M I HC ( L, I Y I HC I M I I I - U 150 �I 127 A 133 144 N V■ N SIGNAGE USE COLUMN MOUNTED MIRRORS FOR BACKING I I I I I I 126 I o a ENGINEERING STAIR T O EL STAIR 143 COLUMN MOUNTED 151 Englnaaring Salutlans ° 134 CORE D CORE E MIRRORS FOR BACKING 10128 E. COLONIAL OR.• SUITE 212 �-- OCOE3E . FLORIDA 347931 106 107 TEL-800 -738 -0525 FAX:(w7) e17-4140 7—M JXXXXXXXX — — — — — — — d — — WWW.OROUNDFL.COM CA*25018 MECH 110 4.1 JOB NO.: TAMP 63 -01 I I I I I I 125 I O a I HC 1 1 0 COLUMN MOUNTED I 152 I I TL: L.Z -1 t�� MIRRORS FOR BACKING - 135 ELEV. 3 ELEV. 4 SIGNAGE USE COLUMN r , 105 108 MOUNTED MIRRORS v/ 124 FOR BACKING o v' 142 �, 153 7 Q 0 WALKWAY L J J LOBBY S � _ _ — _ 0 00, -1 SIGNAGE "I JSE COLUMN WALKWAY ° 5.1 LL iO 123 - MOUNT ORS 154 0 W BAC <ING p I I I I I I 19' -0" I 24' -0" I 19' -0" I 5.5 O Q HC iv I VAN ACCESSIBLE SPACE A w N 122 ° WALKWAY 138 139 141 0) 155 ° Z — Lo - - - -I - - - - - - - 0 LL LL 191-01, 5.8 ° RAM UP `r' 00 v LLI �( o) 137 0) 6 rn HC HC 1 40 `j N — — — — — — — — — — — — — — cV / / I-- — — — — — IF C UMN MOUNTED I I I O I I I I MI RORS FOR I I I I 156 li V/ BA KING a COLUMN MOUNTED I �y 5'-0" 12' -0" 0) 24' -0" 12' -0" 5' -0" MIRRORS FOR BACKING Q O O 113 114 115 116°' 117 118 119 120 121 TYP. N W 0 0 157 `V = I I M r, 4)__ - I - 117 N I _ 1 72 CARS - I - N 91-01, 9' -0" o TYP. TY WALKWAY o CLIENT 9' -0.1 9.4 91_01, 9._011 TYP. � _ _ TYP. _ � - - TYP. - - � - - � - - - - - - - , _ - 9 Client Name O _ _ _ _ _ _ STAIR ELE _ 103 _ _ _ _ 159 _ ELE IR — M 9.2 DESIGNED BY: N r 102 1os CORE C 104 COLUMN MOUNTED CORE F 110 `. ORE G • SIGNAGE "USE COLUMN SIGNAGE "USE COL MN a0 4 �- { _ 104 , 0 MOUNTED MIRRORS MIRRORS TYP. MOUNTED MIRR RS _ 7 109 111 GARRY W. VERMAAS �p 9' -O" WHEN BACKING" WHEN BACKING" 158 ` 24' -0" COLUMN MOUNTED 1 I COLUMN OUNTED I I I I MIRROR FOR BACKING I MIRRORS FOR BACKING DRWN: DATE STD. 102 T60 STA � 11 -06 -06 d a CORE .• — .4 CORR. _ LOBBY — — — — — — — — 1 1 LOBB 110 �— d.• BY - 10 CHKD : DATE • o N • e' :1 110 1 I 108 I 107 I TRASH 101 1 COLUMN MOUNTED I 161 ,10 „o STORAGE I M G 11-06-06 T A ) MIRRORS TYP. TRASH = A I ad 110 110 110 110 oD e ELEV. 1 SIGN E USE COLUMN SIGNAGE USE OLUMN b ° 102 MOUN FED MIRRORS MOUNTED MIR RORS STO. a Q 4 ° , • a Q •. STAIRS TO FIRE �? 1 II Y�Yr I � YI � ►•.I li ♦: ♦:� ♦: ♦: ♦: ♦::= .:3' ►: ♦: ♦: ♦: ♦i i � K♦ �: ♦: ♦: ♦: ♦: ♦: ♦: ♦:f.� _ � ♦:A ♦: ♦: ♦: ♦: ♦:A•: ♦:� ♦ 1: ♦: ♦:A ♦: {•. �3: h ♦. ♦. ♦.♦ �. ♦.•. •,1 1{ COMMAND AREA (!� lib �-.�. IIt � � � �i ►' �1� 1� - �I��,�. 1 V ►: ♦: ♦:•.. �� is ►:11 : ♦: ♦ :I.YY ►:K ♦:i:::�. a ' � ■� � • >. /� 1 1' 1 ►''�� f / ► ♦ / ►,!mow � ®• �■ i ■ rah ♦ 1 / � � � 1• ► • .i,.....,..,� ___..........I..... ■� . ■� � .1 �I ■.�� �....� TRA§ H PICK UP AREA. : ♦:f :f Y 4•.YJ!— E•: ♦: ♦: ♦: ♦: ♦: ♦: ♦:� X14• }i! —�77'. a. • 1.. .0 . . .1 _.•' ►:K ♦: ♦:♦:♦ �: ♦:• y !'H'O� ►:•3: ♦: ♦: ♦: ♦: `:! s �:� : ♦: ♦:�: ♦:♦:♦:♦• - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - . . . ..�wwwwwl�ws 4. FOUNTAIN q. -A A MUNTAIR v e. • • • ' Qv: ° : v • .. d ' • ° • e d ' d ' `° • A PROJ TAMP: ° • e • ° AD °d A. e a • a ° ° 63 -01 ° e • • • • .. Q • a A B C D E F G J K L N P R ORIGINAL FIRST FLOOR RECEIVED SHEET OF NORTH SCALE: 3/32" = 1' -0" AUG 15 2007 A2101 PLANNING DEPARTME ar- it O- w I N I I c N 21' -10" 30' -2" 28' -4" I I I LEGEND NUMBER PARKINGS SPACES 62 I I NUMBER HANDICAPPED SPACES 0 NUMBER OF VAN SPACES 0 TOTAL NUMBER OF SPACES 62 12' -11" 15' -8" 17' -2" 27' -0" 17' -10" 19' -4" 26' -0" 19' -4" 17' -10" 27' -0" 17' -2" 16-5" OPEN ARCADE PORTICO _ _ FA o �o O = 227 244 N , I I I I I I I I V I I 1 I N co 226 _ 191_01, 245 225 6 - 228 243 C? 246 RA DN I I I I I I I I I I 4 224 229 242 247 N \ 5 I I I I I I 223 I o a I 230 I STAIR ° N TO ST LE STAIR 01 CORE D 'CORE E 241 248 106 107 d MEECCH TRASH I 222 I I 231 I zxx O 240 I o I 249 co ELEV.3 ELEV.4 105 108 221 232 I q 239 250 I I I I I I I I I UP TO RD LE I I LOBBY - - - - - - LOBBY - E=— _ NAGE "USE UMN 19' -0" 24' -0" o ° 19' -O" MOUNTE MIRRORS p 220 °' 233 WHEN B KING" 238 a, 251 I I I I I I I I I I I I N 21 n O D- O O C) d .7 �, 0, 234 237 0) 252 235 RAMP UP 236 19' -0" 0 24'-0" tI 1 Lo OD I I I I ' 9' -0" 8' -0" -0" 8'_0� 4� I o a I } I COLUMN MOUNTED-/ CL COLUMN MOUNTE in I- 253 p O MIRRORS FOR ° 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 MIRRORS FOR 0 BACKING Q� 04 I I a 254 N o- I91-01 O 9' -0„ TYP. ' _01. 91-01. 91-0.1 91-01, '- 0 TYP. � (�— - - Nom— - - TYP. -TYP - STAIR 259 256 d � ESE - - - - - - - - N CORE 262 E> 102 103 104 1 SIGNAGE "USE COLUMN COLUM SMODUNTED SIGNA E "USE COLUMN 109 MIRRO 0? ELL O MOUNTED MIRRORS M NTED MIRRORS c0 WHEN BACKING" WHEN BACKING" 255 24' -0" b COLUMN MOUNTED = I 9'_0 91. COLUMN MOUNTED I I MIRRORS TYP. MIRRORS TYP. 260 N 257 1 � TA�IR - - - - - - - - - - - t , - - - - - ORE A _ 100 _ LOBBY I LOBB STORAGE 'I 0 I I I I 0 1 STORAGE 261 I COLUMN MOUNTED I 258 S ORAL 209 208 207 206 205 204 203 201 2 2R = MIRRORS TYP. = O SIGNAGE "USE 0 ELEV.1 - - - - - - - -- _-- - -_ - -- _ 102 MOUNTED = MIRRORS = _ 11 - t-UN tJAUKMd' - - - - - - - - - - -- -- — — — — - - - -- - - - -- — — — — - am SI NAG "USE OLU O N E IR R = 21' -10" 30' -2" 28' -4" 12' -11" 15' -8" FOR BA 17 12" 27' -0" 17' -10" 19'-4" 26' -0" 19' -4" 17' -10" I I I I I I I I I I I I I A B C D E F G H J K L N SECOND FLOOR NORTH SCALE: SCALE: 3/32" = 1' -0" N 00 jmi�jlrtz-m LOBBY M ma _ 27'-0" I TIRE P W o I I 60 I 5 5.1 ib 0 I 5.5 0 00 5.8 6 (V 7 I cc 0 mi r z O ENGINEERING Englnaaring Solutlons 10125 E. COLONIAL DR.. SUITE 212 OCOEE. FLORIDA 3Wt76'1 TEL•800-73B -0625 PAX:(407) 617 -4140 FL. WWW.OROUNDCOM C/W2001B JOB NO.: TAMP 63 -01 TL: L.Z o ] 'n N X L/ N -j QZ �Z 8 J MU o� o m U- CLIENT 9 Client Name Wo 0 �_ 9.2 m I� o } W �W j � Q o ] 'n N X L/ N -j DRWN: DATE 8 J MU 11 -06 -06 CLIENT 9 Client Name i� 1 M 9.2 DESIGNED BY: GARRY W. VERMAAS I N DRWN: DATE 11 -06 -06 i� 1 - Zh 10. ° CHKD: DATE I i0 = FIRE PUMP/ GENERATOR R 0 00 GVN 11 -06 -06 O 11 _°? SEAL - 11.5 ° 12 11 -06 -06 17' -2" 16-5" I I G. VERMAAS PhD PE FL PE 61163: Of ACAD DWG PROJ TAMP: R W 63 -01 RECENED AUG 15 2007 SHEET OF A2.02 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER 21' -10" I I N I I cY �I 30' -2" LEGEND NUMBER PARKINGS SPACES 64 NUMBER HANDICAPPED SPACES 0 NUMBER OF VAN SPACES 0 TATAL NUMBER OF SPACES 64 28'-4" I 12' -11" I I I I I I I I I I 15' -8" 17' -2" 27' -0" 17' -10" iiRlm1w 0111 - el 327 I oa: I I ® I I I I I I I 326 _ i 19' -0" ° 19' -4" 17' -10" `rAffi7Y 17' -2" 16-5" - - - - - - - - - I I io o °- o) 346 19' -0" o a 347 OF 345 348 I I I I 344 349 I iv I ro N I N STAIR 343 350 xxxx J 107 — — — — TRASH axx I C) I 351 I I 342 ELEV. 4 1os 341 352 EEB 19' -0" 24' -0" 0 19' -0" 340 0 I I I I I I 320 I °' I 333 I I Q I I 353 1 a N 319 9 9 CL 334 339 354 335 - 336 - 337 _, 338 24' -0" 0 19' -0" ol � o o � . 1 O � I I I I I I I I I 355 a � ° 8 -4 9'-0" ° 9' -0" 8'4" ' ° 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 U,TYP. r— - -- - -- - -- - -- - - -- - - -� q 356 N - a < I 9' -0' 0 9, -0„ 0 0 ' TYP. (V � TYP. ' -0„ 9._0.. 9. 9._0.. 9._0.. - 0 80 - - �' TYP. TYP- - ° STAIR � 361 358 — — N — — — I — — — CUT= EtEV -- l — ORE C — E — — — - % COLUMN MOUNTED 104 SIGNAGE "USE COLUMN 109 102 • • . MIRRORS TYP. a0 L ------- - - - --� 4 MOUNTED MIRRORS WHEN BACKING POOL A OVE 24' -a' 357 COLUMN M UNTED II I 9' -0" 3'- COLUMN MOUNTED I I I MIRRORS P-- ------ - - - - -J MIRRORS TYP. 362 O N 359 lO • O EA — — Q — — — — — — — — — — — — — — _ LOBBY loo .I LOBE I I I I EQUIPMEI T 3,� I COLUMN MOUNTED I 360 N D 363 I 309 308 307 306 305 304 303 © MIRRORS TYP. STORAGE _ ' STORAGE SIGNAGE "U_SE ELEV. 1 MOUNTED — — — — — — -- - — — T — 102 MIRRORS 2 11 - - - - - - - - - - -- _ — -- - - - -- _ - -- - - - - -- _ — — — — - zxxi SIGNAGE "USE COLUMN FOR BACKING" 21' -10' 30' -2' 28'4„ 12' -11" 16-13" 17' -2' 27 -0" 17 -10 19' -4 26-0" 19'4" 17' -10' I I I I I I I I I I I I I A B C D E F G H J K L N N FLOOR SCALE: 3/32" = 1' -0" nlnRTu 110 it•�� I -, I.)HA:h 5 \'C.. H7'�� •I �� i »A:4 YT:� :'!1MP.. 5.1 CLIENT 9 Client Name I 0 50 0 I r- m>m � Z � WW LL V Er W N 5.5 0 co :a 5.8 6 CV _ 7 1 - � ( IY!1 7K Ti�•hG �C�Si »A:N�611111RR1- .; • !1 ♦ ♦I� !� ® .. I i X. • �, iii 19' -4" 17' -10" `rAffi7Y 17' -2" 16-5" - - - - - - - - - I I io o °- o) 346 19' -0" o a 347 OF 345 348 I I I I 344 349 I iv I ro N I N STAIR 343 350 xxxx J 107 — — — — TRASH axx I C) I 351 I I 342 ELEV. 4 1os 341 352 EEB 19' -0" 24' -0" 0 19' -0" 340 0 I I I I I I 320 I °' I 333 I I Q I I 353 1 a N 319 9 9 CL 334 339 354 335 - 336 - 337 _, 338 24' -0" 0 19' -0" ol � o o � . 1 O � I I I I I I I I I 355 a � ° 8 -4 9'-0" ° 9' -0" 8'4" ' ° 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 U,TYP. r— - -- - -- - -- - -- - - -- - - -� q 356 N - a < I 9' -0' 0 9, -0„ 0 0 ' TYP. (V � TYP. ' -0„ 9._0.. 9. 9._0.. 9._0.. - 0 80 - - �' TYP. TYP- - ° STAIR � 361 358 — — N — — — I — — — CUT= EtEV -- l — ORE C — E — — — - % COLUMN MOUNTED 104 SIGNAGE "USE COLUMN 109 102 • • . MIRRORS TYP. a0 L ------- - - - --� 4 MOUNTED MIRRORS WHEN BACKING POOL A OVE 24' -a' 357 COLUMN M UNTED II I 9' -0" 3'- COLUMN MOUNTED I I I MIRRORS P-- ------ - - - - -J MIRRORS TYP. 362 O N 359 lO • O EA — — Q — — — — — — — — — — — — — — _ LOBBY loo .I LOBE I I I I EQUIPMEI T 3,� I COLUMN MOUNTED I 360 N D 363 I 309 308 307 306 305 304 303 © MIRRORS TYP. STORAGE _ ' STORAGE SIGNAGE "U_SE ELEV. 1 MOUNTED — — — — — — -- - — — T — 102 MIRRORS 2 11 - - - - - - - - - - -- _ — -- - - - -- _ - -- - - - - -- _ — — — — - zxxi SIGNAGE "USE COLUMN FOR BACKING" 21' -10' 30' -2' 28'4„ 12' -11" 16-13" 17' -2' 27 -0" 17 -10 19' -4 26-0" 19'4" 17' -10' I I I I I I I I I I I I I A B C D E F G H J K L N N FLOOR SCALE: 3/32" = 1' -0" nlnRTu 110 O O 0 Z M O ENGINEERING Engineering Solutions 10125 E. COLONIAL. OR., BUTTE 212 OCOEE, FO A LFZXIM 3476'1 TEL:800- 786-0626 PAX--(407) 617 -4140 WWW.OROUNOFL.COM CAi%26018 JOB NO.: TAMP 63 -01 TL: L.Z J I -, QZ �Z 5 o� mo 0 5.1 CLIENT 9 Client Name I 0 50 0 I r- m>m � Z � WW LL V Er W N 5.5 0 co 5.8 6 CV _ 7 O O 0 Z M O ENGINEERING Engineering Solutions 10125 E. COLONIAL. OR., BUTTE 212 OCOEE, FO A LFZXIM 3476'1 TEL:800- 786-0626 PAX--(407) 617 -4140 WWW.OROUNOFL.COM CAi%26018 JOB NO.: TAMP 63 -01 TL: L.Z C? J X � Nw QZ �Z 8 601 \I o� mo 0 LL CLIENT 9 Client Name W 0 50 9.2 m>m � Z � WW LL V Er W N C? J X � Nw 8 601 \I 0 CLIENT 9 Client Name co 9.2 DESIGNED BY: :— GARRY W. VERMAAS I I DRWN: DATE 11 -06 -06 ti LOBBY I STORAGEI CHKD: DATE 3XX _ 3 M 00 GM 11 -06 -06 z if) 11 �) SEAL -�- ' ° 12 (4 11 -06 -06 27' -0" 17' -2" 16' -5" I I 1 G. VERMAAS PhD PE FL PE 61163: ACAD DWG PROJ TAMP'. P R ORIGINAL 63 -01 RECUVED AUG 15 2007 SHEET OF PLANNING DEPARTMENT / Q.03 CITY OF CLEARWATER 1 ■ F � 1 ■1 0�1 ��■ ■M■■ Em NEI 1 111 Oil, 10 bg�:r IH■ ■■■■ MM ■■ MEMO ■:0a 119 MEMO NONE OMEN MEMO NONE NEON MEMO )NEEN MEMO NONE NONE MEMO NONE ■ ■ ■E NONE ■C ■■ cif. ... .: wf . . f� 1 %.•3N!1:•r ! - - -... - - - r■ P. � . ■r ■ IE ■EEEi:�la�:�i��if ■i��ii:��ial�iaLli ■�1li:�li�l� � _1.._�1�.,b %A.2�'IEMMM I!� 1NMilli li ■ii�i/iillillilliNN illillilli r' iiMil ■[li��i�l ■■f��'�� ■ ■ ■ ■� � ����.'- �■■ rrr■ i ■rrrr ■ ■MrrrMErr ■11 ■ ■ ■N1 ■ ■ ■ ■ ■.�. II !�v , ON N loom IN - q I■ I� = N� SRO ■■ ;11■■■ o loom iii ►'! iii: ; _ � �� , NOVA M M M "MIN mossm �i��l� ■ ;Ni�i�■1 iii�iiiiii�i�ii .,� • : :�■i��r ir�iTi .1 � ■���iTiil�iii�iiiiii�i�i 71 It �1 tl 1■ ■ ■im�l. olo�IKW■ 011111111 INN ... ►. I ■I I■I �I -i��i■i�i�G �iiii�'la�a'i; ■i�!! -'-•�' I11�41i1 li.�;i�ii ■,.- : �_: -:__ _- _-= :_.- _; -_ -_ ■ %� _ ��; S ► II'IL�i= :IAN■■■ '♦ ,/ ■■ J i:. i __ tea• i__, fir _ ±- . ■L7�1� ■I ♦�n:n►` 011 M _ J_�._�1-J_I`�I�_ ■ I � E MIN I I, Ar iiii. VA ' !I ����� r li■ !7i►k i-ii '91 i ::� A 02 in i ■ ■ ■EE■ MMMM :� � 'ill ■OONO■ �! ��� 't■MIMNNNN■ ■ ■ ■I■■■ ■N■ '; MENEML VESTIELULE m WO 208 P1 ii pm MENI INN ■1'L'� :iii ■� : : e..e.. ��AAAAAAA�!� m loom ffiffiffil INN Mom ON= =0 IRS mom MMMM • I • ►A,q ■ �■ EMEMEEMEEN MENEM• • -._.- iii i ■Ei ■ ■EiEEi ■ ■ ■■I1�� _gym 0 NEWS ■ ■�' �ii1.1I ■■;J ■EE■ MERE. , NEON ■19'`':Zu. , ■■ ■E OMEN ■■■■. NONE ■■■■ S i�Nwa NONE I IN NEON '\■\R ifI111111l No �.S■■ ■�������5 ml NONE Him OWN ■■■■■ ,... °. ■ ■ ■Ii.NEON Emma EEO loom NNE on ►\ A I1111111 0:1111111 ONO _A I III II O-- _i FD N _ o 00 10 - (V F- 11 - A- B C D E F G H J K L N P R b � �STH THRU 13TH FLOOR SCALE: 3/32" = 1' -0" NORTH 2 _--o O O Z 0 O ENGINEERING Enginaaring Soluticns 10126 E. COLONIAL OR.. SUITE 212 dCOEE. FLORIDA 347931 l'EL:B00 -738 -0525 FA.'L (407) 617 -4140 WWW.OROUNOFL.CCM CA#26016 JOB NO.: TAMP 63 -01 TL: L.Z --�s1 _N 7 _—O Q� o� JZ �g o W Z WW m �l� �w QD Na W �42 J I t'4 U - 9.2 CLIENT Client Name SEAL 11 -06 -06 G. VERMAAS PhD PE FL PE 61163: DESIGNED BY: —' 10 GARRY W. VERMAAS AUG 151007 DRWN: DATE UNIT I A2.05 AC = 2002 SF 11 -06 -06 fERR. = 126 SF CHKD: DATE 11 GW/ 11 -06 -06 -- 11. SEAL 11 -06 -06 G. VERMAAS PhD PE FL PE 61163: ACAD DWG PROJ TAMP: QR,c'jrtp'k( 63 -01 AUG 151007 SHEET OF PLANNING A2.05 DEPARTMENT CTIY OF CLEMWATER cc 0 0 Z 0 0 ENGINEERING Englnaaring Solutlons 10126 E. COLONIAL 13M. SUITE 212 OCa EE. FLOFt(�A 34701 TEL :600- 736 -0626 FAX:(407) 617 -4140 WWW.OROUN13FL.COM CA*26016 JOB NO.: TAMP 63 -01 TL: L.Z CLIENT Client Name DESIGNED BY: GARRY W. VERMAAS DRWN: DATE 11 -06 -06 CHKD: DATE GWV 11 -06 -06 SEAL 11 -06 -06 G. VERMAAS PhD PE FL PE 61163: NORTH ACAD DWG PROJ TAMP: ORIGINAL 14TH FLOOR RECEIVES 63 -01 AUG 15 2007 SHEET OF PLANNING CITY OF CLLEARW E DEPARTMENT 10� QZ JZ o� �g m L- WZ O �U mo wo� D WW �w Na 1 >m w J clU CLIENT Client Name DESIGNED BY: GARRY W. VERMAAS DRWN: DATE 11 -06 -06 CHKD: DATE GWV 11 -06 -06 SEAL 11 -06 -06 G. VERMAAS PhD PE FL PE 61163: NORTH ACAD DWG PROJ TAMP: ORIGINAL 14TH FLOOR RECEIVES 63 -01 AUG 15 2007 SHEET OF PLANNING CITY OF CLLEARW E DEPARTMENT 10� A B C D E F G H J K L N P R 21' -10" 30' -2" 28'4" 12' -11 " 15' -8" 17' -2" 27' -0" 17' -10" 19' -4" 26'4" 19'4" 17' -10" 27'4" 17' -2" 16' -5" UNIT D UNIT E UNIT F C = 2229 SF AC = 2369 SF AC = 2229 S 1 TERR. = 172 SF TERR. = 315 SF TERR. = 172 F N I I I I I I I I I I I I I I � _ - - 11 . 5 TERI&C - 2 PIP TERRACE 155 SF �155SF RAN ALON RAN SAO Q �Q 01 6� ib MAST INI G ON MAST SUITE SUITE 10 DINING DINING HIS HERS HIS cc • HERS • . HIS 1 I ° HERS 3 0 °o 0 KITC N 2369 SF. °o M, TH M. T C. O I I I I I I I Q DEN/ ' DEN L I Q I I I BR DEN/ N i R3 o N E:] o LLNDRY EV O I I I I I I I UNIT "H" I 1 I. 1 I UNIT "G" I I I AC.�129 SF e TERR. =1418 SF BED OO 2 � � S B DR O 2 AC = 1874 SF 4 �� TERR. = 167 S 4 ENGINEERING Englnaaring Solutions WI.0 ME I. I.C. 90156 E. COLONIAL OR., SUITE 212 MA ER SUIT BEDR OM 3 OCOEE. FLORIDA 3.4F61 ASTER ITE 4.1 TEL:B00- 738-0628 FAX:(407)617 -4140 W Q I I I WW.OROUNOFL.COM C-/W28018 FOYE HIS ELEV. 3 Q O ELEV. 4 HIS JOB NO.: TAMP 63 -01 205 208 60 TERRACE HERS HERS TERRACE 11 TL: L.Z BED OOM 2 OF 5 Z G ND SA N G ND SAI�N, 0 1 — \ / Z - - - - - - - - - - - - 48 7 - u- 5.5 5 Zo NG C O O E DIN L T N \ O • LND ® DEN/ DEN/ DRY 00 0 1 BR 3 BR 3 /V 5.8 W 6 D Z MM - - - - - - - F - - - - D A 2 BA > 0 'r 7 0 LL w B77 2 B R M2 I.L OF I - I - - ' - - ' - ' - - I ROO I_ _ I 8 X w / o J MU r r a— - - - - - °) CLIENT URTYARD _ _I 1 f / - / C s \ — —< \ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I f= 9 2 Client Name C9 I I ° II II II II II II II II II II II II II �� —_ �1�FfiFTFI�11�1 I I'— DESIGNED BY: Y �______ II II II II II IL I I ) L I I— r- I I I I I I I I I I I I I I i �t f m Tj GARRY W. VERMAAS DRWN: DATE - - - - - - - - - - - -� 10. 11 -06 -06 N I I I I � TERRACE B LOW - - - - � -� I TERI CE BE L W I ' F- 0 0 ° 0 t- CC) CHKD: DATE - - - - - - - - - - - 10 - - - - - - - - - - - °- - - - - 10.8 IF GM 11 -06 -06 11 1 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 12 SEAL N 21' -10" 30' -2" 28'4" 12' -11 " 15'4" 17' -2" 27' -0" 17' -10" 19'4" 26' -0" 19' -4" 17' -10" 27' -0" 17' -2" 16-5" I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 11 -06 -06 G. VERMAAS PhD PE FL PE 61163: A B C D E F G H J K L N P R ACAD DWG PROJ TAMP: NORTH 'ORIGINAL 63 -01 15TH FLOOR RECEIVED AUG 15 2007 SHEET OF CITY OF CLEARw DEPARTMENT ER O 1 A A B C D E F G H J K L N P R 21' -10" 30' -2" 28'4" 12' -11 " 15' -8" 17' -2" 27' -0" 17' -10" 19' -4" 26'4" 19'4" 17' -10" 27'4" 17' -2" 16' -5" UNIT D UNIT E UNIT F C = 2229 SF AC = 2369 SF AC = 2229 S 1 TERR. = 172 SF TERR. = 315 SF TERR. = 172 F N I I I I I I I I I I I I I I � _ - - 11 . 5 TERI&C - 2 PIP TERRACE 155 SF �155SF RAN ALON RAN SAO Q �Q 01 6� ib MAST INI G ON MAST SUITE SUITE 10 DINING DINING HIS HERS HIS cc • HERS • . HIS 1 I ° HERS 3 0 °o 0 KITC N 2369 SF. °o M, TH M. T C. O I I I I I I I Q DEN/ ' DEN L I Q I I I BR DEN/ N i R3 o N E:] o LLNDRY EV O I I I I I I I UNIT "H" I 1 I. 1 I UNIT "G" I I I AC.�129 SF e TERR. =1418 SF BED OO 2 � � S B DR O 2 AC = 1874 SF 4 �� TERR. = 167 S 4 ENGINEERING Englnaaring Solutions WI.0 ME I. I.C. 90156 E. COLONIAL OR., SUITE 212 MA ER SUIT BEDR OM 3 OCOEE. FLORIDA 3.4F61 ASTER ITE 4.1 TEL:B00- 738-0628 FAX:(407)617 -4140 W Q I I I WW.OROUNOFL.COM C-/W28018 FOYE HIS ELEV. 3 Q O ELEV. 4 HIS JOB NO.: TAMP 63 -01 205 208 60 TERRACE HERS HERS TERRACE 11 TL: L.Z BED OOM 2 OF 5 Z G ND SA N G ND SAI�N, 0 1 — \ / Z - - - - - - - - - - - - 48 7 - u- 5.5 5 Zo NG C O O E DIN L T N \ O • LND ® DEN/ DEN/ DRY 00 0 1 BR 3 BR 3 /V 5.8 W 6 D Z MM - - - - - - - F - - - - D A 2 BA > 0 'r 7 0 LL w B77 2 B R M2 I.L OF I - I - - ' - - ' - ' - - I ROO I_ _ I 8 X w / o J MU r r a— - - - - - °) CLIENT URTYARD _ _I 1 f / - / C s \ — —< \ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I f= 9 2 Client Name C9 I I ° II II II II II II II II II II II II II �� —_ �1�FfiFTFI�11�1 I I'— DESIGNED BY: Y �______ II II II II II IL I I ) L I I— r- I I I I I I I I I I I I I I i �t f m Tj GARRY W. VERMAAS DRWN: DATE - - - - - - - - - - - -� 10. 11 -06 -06 N I I I I � TERRACE B LOW - - - - � -� I TERI CE BE L W I ' F- 0 0 ° 0 t- CC) CHKD: DATE - - - - - - - - - - - 10 - - - - - - - - - - - °- - - - - 10.8 IF GM 11 -06 -06 11 1 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 12 SEAL N 21' -10" 30' -2" 28'4" 12' -11 " 15'4" 17' -2" 27' -0" 17' -10" 19'4" 26' -0" 19' -4" 17' -10" 27' -0" 17' -2" 16-5" I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 11 -06 -06 G. VERMAAS PhD PE FL PE 61163: A B C D E F G H J K L N P R ACAD DWG PROJ TAMP: NORTH 'ORIGINAL 63 -01 15TH FLOOR RECEIVED AUG 15 2007 SHEET OF CITY OF CLEARw DEPARTMENT ER O 1 A B C D E F G H J K L N P R 21' -10" 30' -2" 28' -4" 12' -11" 15' -8" 17' -2" 27' -0" 17' -10" 19' -4" 26' -0" 19' -4" 17' -10" 27' -0" 17' -2" 16' -5" UNIT "K" UNIT "J' AC. =3129 SF AC =3129 SF TERR. =1416 SF TERR. =1416 SF 1 1 1.5 — — 2 - - - - - 2 I I I I I I I I I I I DINING DINING iv 19 1 N I I I I I I I I I I MASTER SUITE MASTER SUITE I N GF AND SALON GRAND 81 LON KITCHEN — — S — I — — KITCHEN IF ❑ ❑ O NDR Ails so I I I I I I I I FAMILY F1 I I I FAMILY I I I I Y co °O N N MECH❑® M. BATH M. BATH BA 2 O OMECH. BA 2 I I I I I I I 4EDROOM 2 ® S R I I STAIR I BEDROOf412 I I I ORE D CORE 208 207 O _ uw ME BA 3 BA 3 4.1 I I I I I I I P I I�1 I CL. Cl I -.• I DR I I I Al ENGINEERING `C ELEV. 3 ELEV.4 Hnginaaring Solutlons 10128 E. COLONIAL DR.. SUITE 212 FOYER 205 � FOYER OCOEE. PLOFtICA a.4Te1 TEL:1300- 798-0828 FAX:(407) 817-4140 WWW.OR0U14DFL.CQM CAA126018 a BEDROOM 3 BEDROOM 3 or I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I JOB NO.: TAMP 63 -01 Fill 5 TL: Ll 5.1 00 / ^ u, o � z Q — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 5.5 \ N ROOF ROOF o J 0 / \ - Z -- J J- mLL 6 6 = 00 7 o N 0 U W LL Z I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I \ I I 0 W ROOF ROOF 1 I Q I _ _ I - ' - - ' - - ' - ' ! - - ' - V � 0 X �W 9� - -T-- - - --,—- -� -- ,- - - -� - -- - - -� --,- --7- ,- 9 N-� U RTYARD _ _ _ _ _ _ J V 1 CLIENT I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I N Client Name 10 DESIGNED BY: ROOF BF _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ OF - - - - - - - - - - - - - a M 10' GARRY W. VERMAAS 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I co I (V CO 0 DRWN: DATE o 0 0 11 -06 -06 � 11 I? r CHKD: DATE - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - GWV 11 -06 -06 12 N 21' -10" 30' -2" ; 28' -4" 12' -11" 15' -8" 17' -2" 27' -0" 17' -10" 19' -4" 26' -0" 19' -4" 17' -10" 27' -0" 17' -2" 16' -5" I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I SEAL 11 -06 -06 A B C D E F G H J K L N P R G. VERMAAS PhD PE FL PE 61163: ACAD DWG PROJ TAMP: 16th FLOOR NORTH ORIGINAL 63 -01 1 RECEIVED AUG 15 2007 SHEET OF PLANNING DEPARTMENT A2108 CITY OF CLEARWATER A • A B C D E F G H J K L N P R 21' -10" 30' -2" 28' -4" 12' -11" 15' -8" 17' -2" 27' -0" 17' -10" 19' -4" 26' -0" 19' -4" 17' -10" 27' -0" 17' -2" 16' -5" UNIT "K" UNIT "J' AC. =3129 SF AC =3129 SF TERR. =1416 SF TERR. =1416 SF 1 1 1.5 — — 2 - - - - - 2 I I I I I I I I I I I DINING DINING iv 19 1 N I I I I I I I I I I MASTER SUITE MASTER SUITE I N GF AND SALON GRAND 81 LON KITCHEN — — S — I — — KITCHEN IF ❑ ❑ O NDR Ails so I I I I I I I I FAMILY F1 I I I FAMILY I I I I Y co °O N N MECH❑® M. BATH M. BATH BA 2 O OMECH. BA 2 I I I I I I I 4EDROOM 2 ® S R I I STAIR I BEDROOf412 I I I ORE D CORE 208 207 O _ uw ME BA 3 BA 3 4.1 I I I I I I I P I I�1 I CL. Cl I -.• I DR I I I Al ENGINEERING `C ELEV. 3 ELEV.4 Hnginaaring Solutlons 10128 E. COLONIAL DR.. SUITE 212 FOYER 205 � FOYER OCOEE. PLOFtICA a.4Te1 TEL:1300- 798-0828 FAX:(407) 817-4140 WWW.OR0U14DFL.CQM CAA126018 a BEDROOM 3 BEDROOM 3 or I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I JOB NO.: TAMP 63 -01 Fill 5 TL: Ll 5.1 00 / ^ u, o � z Q — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 5.5 \ N ROOF ROOF o J 0 / \ - Z -- J J- mLL 6 6 = 00 7 o N 0 U W LL Z I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I \ I I 0 W ROOF ROOF 1 I Q I _ _ I - ' - - ' - - ' - ' ! - - ' - V � 0 X �W 9� - -T-- - - --,—- -� -- ,- - - -� - -- - - -� --,- --7- ,- 9 N-� U RTYARD _ _ _ _ _ _ J V 1 CLIENT I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I N Client Name 10 DESIGNED BY: ROOF BF _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ OF - - - - - - - - - - - - - a M 10' GARRY W. VERMAAS 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I co I (V CO 0 DRWN: DATE o 0 0 11 -06 -06 � 11 I? r CHKD: DATE - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - GWV 11 -06 -06 12 N 21' -10" 30' -2" ; 28' -4" 12' -11" 15' -8" 17' -2" 27' -0" 17' -10" 19' -4" 26' -0" 19' -4" 17' -10" 27' -0" 17' -2" 16' -5" I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I SEAL 11 -06 -06 A B C D E F G H J K L N P R G. VERMAAS PhD PE FL PE 61163: ACAD DWG PROJ TAMP: 16th FLOOR NORTH ORIGINAL 63 -01 1 RECEIVED AUG 15 2007 SHEET OF PLANNING DEPARTMENT A2108 CITY OF CLEARWATER A B C D E F G H J K L N P R 21' -10" 30' -2" 28' -4" 12' -11" 15' -8" 17' -2" 27' -0" 17' -10" 19' -4" 26' -0" 19' -4" 17' -10" 27' -0" 17' -2" 16' -5" 1 1 N I I I I I I I I II MECHANICAL I YARD I I I I I I I I I I N N CO LING TOWER I I - -- -- - -- T-- bo 0 I I I I I I I I li ( I II I I I I N N Oro I Z I I I I I I I I II I ORE D I I CORER zas I O I ' 207 I O E d II I I 4.1 CD ENGINEERING Engineering Solutions a 10126 E. . I I r- CO LON IAL R OIDR:.A , S U 3IT4E 7 2619 2 (o OCOEE TEL:BOO- 738-06F26 LOFAX(40T)617 -4140 I I VWVW.OROUNGFL.COM CAAR26018 ' ELEVATOR OVERRUN II ' ' I JOB NO.: TAMP 63 -01 ' S TL: L.Z I I I I I I I I I I L----- -- - - - - -- I I I I I I O Z o N JZ J -j 6 — — — — — — — bo 4) 6 0 � / 7 w - Z _w I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I \ 0 p 0 1.1.. 0 li - � J w L- ROOF I I I I I I I ROOF - - - - - - - - - - - - - = V � X URTYARD REI OW J (� U bo 1 io - CLIENT I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Client Name 10 DESIGNED BY: - - - - - - - - ROOF BF - - - - - - - - - - - - - - R OF REI QXAf 10. GARRY W. VERMAAS 0 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I io I - <V co � co DRWN: DATE — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Q — — — — 10.8 11 -06 -06 � 11 I m CHKD: DATE - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 11.5 GWV 11 -06 -06 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 12 N 21' -10" 30' -2" 28' -4" 12' -11 " 15' -8" 17' -2" 27' -0" 17' -10" 19' -4" 26' -0" 19' -4" 17' -10" 27' -0" 17' -2" 16' -5" I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I SEAL 11 -06 -06 G. VERMAAS PhD PE FL PE 61163: NORTH ACAD DWG PROJ TAMP: RECEIVED ORIGINAL 63 -01 � ROOF DECK AUG 15 2007 SHEET OF PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER A') L,O9 A A B C D E F G H J K L N P R 21' -10" 30' -2" 28' -4" 12' -11" 15' -8" 17' -2" 27' -0" 17' -10" 19' -4" 26' -0" 19' -4" 17' -10" 27' -0" 17' -2" 16' -5" 1 1 N I I I I I I I I II MECHANICAL I YARD I I I I I I I I I I N N CO LING TOWER I I - -- -- - -- T-- bo 0 I I I I I I I I li ( I II I I I I N N Oro I Z I I I I I I I I II I ORE D I I CORER zas I O I ' 207 I O E d II I I 4.1 CD ENGINEERING Engineering Solutions a 10126 E. . I I r- CO LON IAL R OIDR:.A , S U 3IT4E 7 2619 2 (o OCOEE TEL:BOO- 738-06F26 LOFAX(40T)617 -4140 I I VWVW.OROUNGFL.COM CAAR26018 ' ELEVATOR OVERRUN II ' ' I JOB NO.: TAMP 63 -01 ' S TL: L.Z I I I I I I I I I I L----- -- - - - - -- I I I I I I O Z o N JZ J -j 6 — — — — — — — bo 4) 6 0 � / 7 w - Z _w I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I \ 0 p 0 1.1.. 0 li - � J w L- ROOF I I I I I I I ROOF - - - - - - - - - - - - - = V � X URTYARD REI OW J (� U bo 1 io - CLIENT I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Client Name 10 DESIGNED BY: - - - - - - - - ROOF BF - - - - - - - - - - - - - - R OF REI QXAf 10. GARRY W. VERMAAS 0 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I io I - <V co � co DRWN: DATE — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Q — — — — 10.8 11 -06 -06 � 11 I m CHKD: DATE - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 11.5 GWV 11 -06 -06 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 12 N 21' -10" 30' -2" 28' -4" 12' -11 " 15' -8" 17' -2" 27' -0" 17' -10" 19' -4" 26' -0" 19' -4" 17' -10" 27' -0" 17' -2" 16' -5" I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I SEAL 11 -06 -06 G. VERMAAS PhD PE FL PE 61163: NORTH ACAD DWG PROJ TAMP: RECEIVED ORIGINAL 63 -01 � ROOF DECK AUG 15 2007 SHEET OF PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER A') L,O9 n s COLOR LEGEND COLOR LOCATION DURON TYPE MILLENIIJ1 COLORS 8334 M. P -I WALL TAUPE ROSE P -2 WALL 8332 W. SPICE BEIGE P-3 WALL 8281 W. PINK MOCHA P -4 WALL 8250 W. IVORY SAMPLER P -5 S WHITE 5ANDS P -6 MLLIS WHITE P-1 ROOF T856 A. TOMAHAUX GRILLS/ 8856 K P -8 RAILM I BERNARD BRM COLOR LEGEND COLOR LOCATION DURON MILLENI COLORS 8334 M. P -1 WALL TAUPE ROSE 8331 W. P -2 WALL SPICE BEIGE P -3 WALL 8281 W. PINK MOCHA 8250 W. P -4 WALL IVORY SAMPLER P -5 COLUMNS WHITE BANDS P -6 TRELLIS WHITE P -1 ROOF 18 A TOMAHAWK GRILLS/ 8856 N. P -8 RAILING BERNARD BR011lrl COLOR LEGEND COLOR LOCATION DURON TYPE MILLENI COLORS 8334 M. P -1 WALL TAUPE ROSE P -2 WALL 8332 W. SPICE BEIGE P -3 WALL 8281 W. PINK MOCHA P -4 WALL 8250 W. IVORY SAMPLER P -5 COL"S WHITE BANDS P -6 TRELLIS WHITE P P-1 ROOF ROOF 185 A 6 TOMAHAWK GRILLS/ 8856 N. P -8 RAILING BERNARD BROWN NORTH ELEVATION SCALE: 1116" = 1' -0" I -L/ ORIGINAL RECEIVED AUG 15 2007 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER ICE 0 0 mi Z 0 W ENGINEERING Engineering Solutions 10126 E. COLONIAL OFL.. SUITH 212 OCOEE, FLORIDA 34761 TEL•600-796 -0626 FAX:(407) 617 -4140 WWW.OFtQUNOFL.CCM CAN26016 JOB NO.: TAMP 63 -01 TL: L.Z -i Q� JZ o� �o • L- III O �U W I� L2 p Z 0 } � WW �� j MU m Q w ICE 0 0 mi Z 0 W ENGINEERING Engineering Solutions 10126 E. COLONIAL OFL.. SUITH 212 OCOEE, FLORIDA 34761 TEL•600-796 -0626 FAX:(407) 617 -4140 WWW.OFtQUNOFL.CCM CAN26016 JOB NO.: TAMP 63 -01 TL: L.Z -i CLIENT Client Name L j DESIGNED BY: GARRY W.VERMAAS DRWN: DATE 11 -06 -06 L HKD: DATE jGWV 11 -06 -06 SEAL 11 -06 -06 G. VERMAAS PhD PE FL PE 61163: ACAD DWG PROJ TAMP: 63 -01 SHEET OF A3104 Q� JZ o� �o m L- III O �U W I� L2 p Z 0 } � WW �� j MU m Q w CLIENT Client Name L j DESIGNED BY: GARRY W.VERMAAS DRWN: DATE 11 -06 -06 L HKD: DATE jGWV 11 -06 -06 SEAL 11 -06 -06 G. VERMAAS PhD PE FL PE 61163: ACAD DWG PROJ TAMP: 63 -01 SHEET OF A3104