The URL can be used to link to this page

FLD2007-01001; SEE DVA2007-00001:Clearwater 0�� Planning Department 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, Florida 33756 Telephone: 727 - 562 -4567 Fax: 727 - 562 -4865 ❑ SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION ❑ SUBMIT 14 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION -Plans and application are required to be collated, stapled, and folded into sets ❑ SUBMIT APPLICATION FEE $1,205.00 CASE #: RECEIVED BY (staff initials): DATE RECEIVED: * NOTE: 15 TOTAL SETS OF INFORMATION REQUIRED (APPLICATIONS PLUS SITE PLAN SETS) 4141 Il. F P �- 2 U07 PLANNI t ,fig, ?I I iVT CITY OF CLEARWATER FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project (Revised 10/25/2006) — PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT— A. APPLICANT, P APPLICANT NAME: MAILING ADDRESS: PHONE NUMBER: PROPERTY OWNER(S): List ALL owners on the deed AGENT NAME: MAILING ADDRESS: PHONE NUMBER: CELL NUMBER: OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4- 202.A) Crystal Beach Capital, LLC 101 E. Kennedy Blvd., Suite 2125, Tampa, FL 33602 813 -226 -9897 CELL NUMBER: Beach LLC Stephen J. Szabo, III, Es q. 100 N. Tampa Street, Suite 2700, Tampa, FL 33602 813 - 225 -4193 FAX NUMBER: 813- 221 -4210 E -MAIL ADDRESS: SSZabonfolev.com B. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4- 202.A) PROJECT NAME: Clearwater Beach Hyatt PROJECT VALUATION: $0 if bridge is eliminated $3.Om -$5.Om if built STREET ADDRESS 301 Gulfview Blvd. PARCEL NUMBER(S): 07/29/15/52380/000 /0570; 07/29/15/52380/000 /0580; and 07/29/15/52380/000 /1050 PARCEL SIZE (acres): 1.56 acres PARCEL SIZE (square feet): Approx. 67,950 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: See Exhibit A attached hereto. Note that acreage of land decreased after 10' of road for Coronado was deeded to City. PROPOSED USE(S): 250 condo hotel units and 18 condominium units DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST: Eliminate the pedestrian overpass and to provide for a standalone concessions Specifically identify the request of the bridge landing area. (include number of units or square footage of non- residential use and all requested code deviations; e.g. reduction in required number of parking spaces, specific use, etc. Page 1 of 8 IP_520723.1 in lieu a 0 DOES THIS APPLICATION INVOLVE THE TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS (TDR), A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, OR A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED (CERTIFIED) SITE PLAN? YES _ NO _ (if yes, attach a copy of the applicable documents) C. PROOF OF OWNERSHIP: (Code Section 4- 202.A.5) ❑ SUBMIT A COPY OF THE TITLE INSURANCE POLICY, DEED TO THE PROPERTY OR SIGN AFFIDAVIT ATTESTING OWNERSHIP (see page 7) D. WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 3- 913.A) ❑ Provide complete responses to the six (6) GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA— Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail: 1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. The proposed elimination of the pedestrian bridge and landing will remove a structure above Gulfview Boulevard and on south beach. There are currently no other similar structures or bridges above Gulfview Boulevard or on south beach. 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. The proposed elimination of the pedestrian bridge and landing will enhance the development and use of the adjacent buildings by not obstructing the views of south beach, the Gulf of Mexico and the daily sunsets from the adjacent properties. 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use. The existence or non - existence of the pedestrian bridge and landing will have no effect, either positive or negative on the health or safety of persons residing or working in the neighborhood, as neither would likely use the bridge or landing. 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. The proposed elimination of the pedestrian bridge and landing will minimize traffic congestion by eliminating a structure above South Gulfview Boulevard that has the potential to distract individuals operating motor vehicles. The distraction would occur because the structure will be rather large and be the only structure above Gulfview Boulevard. Pedestrians walking above motorists on the bridge also have the potential to distract them. The proposed replacement crosswalk will be similar to all the other crosswalks along South Gulfview Boulevard, providing a consistent visual image at street level to motorists of areas where pedestrians may be present. 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. The proposed elimination of the pedestrian bridge and landing is consistent with the community character in the immediate vicinity because no other parcel has a pedestrian bridge and landing over Gulfview Boulevard onto south beach. Furthermore, the proposed replacement for the pedestrian bridge is a crosswalk on Gulfview Boulevard consistent with the other crosswalks on Gulfview Boulevard that are being constructed a part of Beach Walk. 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts, on adjacent properties. The construction of the proposed pedestrian bridge and landing would have an adverse visual impact on neighboring properties as it would obstruct their view of the beach, Gulf of Mexico and daily sunsets. The elimination of the pedestrian bridge and landing would leave the existing views from neighboring properties in place. The construction or elimination of the pedestrian bridge and landing will have no impact on the acoustic, olfactory or hours of operation of adjace tt R�raperties. IP_520723.1 Page 2 of 8 IEf 1 02 207 PLANNING DEPARTMENT rJJy nr- r_- .F AWIATER 0 0 WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project Criteria) ❑ Provide complete responses to the six (6) COMPREHENSIVE INFILL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT CRITERIA— Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail: 1. The development or redevelopment is otherwise impractical without deviations from the use and /or development standards set forth in this zoning district. The proposed elimination of the pedestrian bridge and landing is not a stand -alone development, but rather an appendage to Aqualea, one of the three catalytic resort developments desired by Beach by Design. The elimination or construction of the bridge will have no impact on the practicality of the development of Aqualea. 2. The development or redevelopment will be consistent with the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan, as well as with the general purpose, intent and basic planning objectives of this Code, and with the intent and purpose of this zoning district The construction of the pedestrian bridge and landing is inconsistent with the general purpose, intent and basic planning objectives of Beach by Design. Its replacement with a pedestrian crosswalk is consistent with Beach By Design. 3. The development or redevelopment will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of surrounding properties. The construction or elimination of the pedestrian bridge and landing will have no impact on the orderly development and improvement of surrounding properties. 4. Adjoining properties will not suffer substantial detriment as a result of the proposed development. The elimination of the pedestrian bridge and overpass will have no detrimental effect on adjoining properties, as it only served to move pedestrians back and forth from the beach to the parking garage within Aqualea. 5. The proposed use shall otherwise be permitted by the underlying future land use category, be compatible with adjacent land uses, will not substantially alter the essential use characteristics of the neighborhood; and shall demonstrate compliance with one or more of the following objectives: a. The proposed use is permitted in this zoning district as a minimum standard, flexible standard or flexible development use; b. The proposed use would be a significant economic contributor to the City's economic base by diversifying the local economy or by creating jobs; c. The development proposal accommodates the expansion or redevelopment of an existing economic contributor; d. The proposed use provides for the provision of affordable housing; e. The proposed use provides for development or redevelopment in an area that is characterized by other similar development and where a land use plan amendment and rezoning would result in a spot land use or zoning designation; or f. The proposed use provides for the development of a new and /or preservation of a working waterfront use. The construction of the pedestrian bridge and landing is not specifically permitted by the underlying future land use category. Its construction is not compatible with adjacent land uses. Its construction or elimination will not substantially alter the essential use characteristics of the neighborhood. 6. Flexibility with regard to use, lot width, required setbacks, height and off - street parking are justified based on demonstrated compliance with all of the following design objectives: a. The proposed development will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of the surrounding properties for uses permitted in this zoning district; b. The proposed development complies with applicable design guidelines adopted by the City; c. The design, scale and intensity of the proposed development supports the established or emerging character of an area; d. In order to form a cohesive, visually interesting and attractive appearance, the proposed development incorporates a substantial number of the following design elements: ❑ Changes in horizontal building planes; ❑ Use of architectural details such as columns, cornices, stringcourses, pilasters, porticos, balconies, railings, awnings, etc.; ❑ Variety in materials, colors and textures; ❑ Distinctive fenestration patterns; ❑ Building stepbacks; and ❑ Distinctive roofs forms. e. The proposed development provides for appropriate buffers, enhanced landscape design and appropriate distances between buildings. The proposed pedestrian bridge and landing is an appendage to Aqualea, one of the three catalytic resort developments desired in Beach by Design. The construction or elimination of the pedestrian bridge and landing will have no effect on the use, lot width, required setbacks and off - street parking for Aqualea. Page 3 of 8 ORIGI IP_520723.1 MICENED FR fl?, ?007 0 E. STORMWATER PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteria Manual and 4- 202.A.21) ❑ A STORMWATER NARRATIVE MUST BE SUBMITTED WITH ALL APPLICATIONS. All applications that involve addition or modification of impervious surface, including buildings, must include a stormwater plan that demonstrates compliance with the City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteria manual. A reduction in impervious surface area does not qualify as an exemption to this requirement. ❑ If a plan is not required, the narrative shall provide an explanation as to why the site is exempt. ❑ At a minimum, the STORMWATER PLAN shall include the following; ❑ Existing topography extending 50 feet beyond all property lines; ❑ Proposed grading including finished floor elevations of all structures; ❑ All adjacent streets and municipal storm systems; ❑ Proposed stormwater detention /retention area including top of bank, toe of slope and outlet control structure; ❑ A narrative describing the proposed stormwater control plan including all calculations and data necessary to demonstrate compliance with the City manual. ❑ Proposed stormwater detention /retention area including top of bank, toe of slope and outlet control structure; ❑ Signature and seal of Florida Registered Professional Engineer on all plans and calculations. ❑ COPY OF PERMIT INQUIRY LETTER OR SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT (SWFWMD) PERMIT SUBMITTAL (SWFWMD approval is required prior to issuance of City Building Permit), if applicable ❑ ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF STORMWATER PLAN REQUIREMENTS (Applicant must initial one of the following): Stormwater plan as noted above is included Stormwater plan is not required and explanation narrative is attached. At a minimum, a grading plan and finished floor elevations shall be provided. CAUTION - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A STORMWATER PLAN AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 562 -4750. F. SUPPLEMENTAL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 4- 202.A) ❑ SIGNED AND SEALED SURVEY (including legal description of property) — One original and 14 copies; ❑ TREE SURVEY (including existing trees on site and within 25' of the adjacent site, by species, size (DBH 4" or greater), and location, including drip lines and indicating trees to be removed) — please design around the existing trees; ❑ TREE INVENTORY; prepared by a "certified arborist ", of all trees 4" DBH or greater, reflecting size, canopy (drip lines) and condition of such trees; ❑ LOCATION MAP OF THE PROPERTY; ❑ PARKING DEMAND STUDY in conjunction with a request to make deviations to the parking standards (ie. Reduce number of spaces). Prior to the submittal of this application, the methodology of such study shall be approved by the Community Development Coordinator and shall be in accordance with accepted traffic engineering principles. The findings of the study will be used in determining whether or not deviations to the parking standards are approved; ❑ GRADING PLAN, as applicable; ❑ PRELIMINARY PLAT, as required (Note: Building permits will not be issued until evidence of recording a final plat is provided); ❑ COPY OF RECORDED PLAT, as applicable; ORIGINAL. RE01 D v, 0 2 2007 Page 4 of 8 PLANNING L)hFARIMENT 1P_520723.1 CITY OF CLEARWATER G. SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4- 202.A) n C Al SITE PLAN with the following information (not to exceed 24" x 36 "): Index sheet referencing individual sheets included in package; North arrow; Engineering bar scale (minimum scale one inch equals 50 feet), and date prepared; All dimensions; Footprint and size of all EXISTING buildings and structures; Footprint and size of all PROPOSED buildings and structures; All required setbacks; All existing and proposed points of access; All required sight triangles; Identification of environmentally unique areas, such as watercourses, wetlands, tree masses, and specimen trees, including description and location of understory, ground cover vegetation and wildlife habitats, etc; Location of all public and private easements; Location of all street rights -of -way within and adjacent to the site; Location of existing public and private utilities, including fire hydrants, storm and sanitary sewer lines, manholes and lift stations, gas and water lines; All parking spaces, driveways, loading areas and vehicular use areas; Depiction by shading or crosshatching of all required parking lot interior landscaped areas; Location of all solid waste containers, recycling or trash handling areas and outside mechanical equipment and all required screening (per Section 3- 201(D)(i) and Index #701); Location of all landscape material; Location of all onsite and offsite storm -water management facilities; Location of all outdoor lighting fixtures; and Location of all existing and proposed sidewalks. SITE DATA TABLE for existing, required, and proposed development, in written /tabular form: EXISTING REQUIRED PROPOSED Land area in square feet and acres; Number of EXISTING dwelling units; Number of PROPOSED dwelling units; Gross floor area devoted to each use; Parking spaces: total number, presented in tabular form with the number of required spaces; Total paved area, including all paved parking spaces & driveways, expressed in square feet & percentage of the paved vehicular area; Official records book and page numbers of all existing utility easement; Building and structure heights; Impermeable surface ratio (I.S.R.); and Floor area ratio (F.A.R.) for all nonresidential uses. REDUCED COLOR SITE PLAN to scale (8' /Z X 11); FOR DEVELOPMENTS OVER ONE ACRE, provide the following additional information on site plan: One -foot contours or spot elevations on site; Offsite elevations if required to evaluate the proposed stormwater management for the parcel; All open space areas; Location of all earth or water retaining walls and earth berms; Lot lines and building lines (dimensioned); Streets and drives (dimensioned); Building and structural setbacks (dimensioned); Structural ORIGINAL RECE VED 0 2 2007 P NHM' � : UEP ARTIVIENT Page 5 of s 1P_520723.1 CITY OF CLEARWATER H. LANDSCAPING PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4- 1102.A) ❑ LANDSCAPE PLAN with the following information (not to exceed 24" x 36 "): All existing and proposed structures; Names of abutting streets; Drainage and retention areas including swales, side slopes and bottom elevations; Delineation and dimensions of all required perimeter landscape buffers; Sight visibility triangles; Delineation and dimensions of all parking areas including landscaping islands and curbing; Existing trees on -site and immediately adjacent to the site, by species, size and locations, including driplines (as indicated on required tree survey); Location, size, and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, indicated by a key relating to the plant _ schedule; Plant schedule with a key (symbol or label) indicating the size, description, specifications, quantities, and spacing requirements of all existing and proposed landscape materials, including botanical and common names; Typical planting details for trees, palms, shrubs and ground cover plants including instructions, soil mixes, backfilling, mulching and protective measures; Interior landscaping areas hatched and /or shaded and labeled and interior landscape coverage, expressing in both square feet and percentage covered; Conditions of a previous development approval (e.g. conditions imposed by the Community Development Board); Irrigation notes. ❑ REDUCED COLOR LANDSCAPE PLAN to scale (8' /2X 11); ❑ COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM application, as applicable. Landscape associated with the Comprehensive Landscape Program shall exceed minimum Code requirements to offset the areas where minimum Code will not be met. I. BUILDING ELEVATION PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4- 202.A.23) ❑ BUILDING ELEVATION DRAWINGS — with the following information; All sides of all buildings; Dimensioned; Colors (provide one full sized set of colored elevations); Materials; Sight visibility triangles; ❑ REDUCED BUILDING ELEVATIONS — same as above to scale on 8 % X 11. J. SIGNAGE: (Division 19. SIGNS / Section 3 -1806) ORIGINAL RECEIVED FL r,,', C 2 2007 P Nu'O.G Lmr<<vMENT MY OF CI.EARWVATER ❑ All EXISTING freestanding and attached signs; Provide photographs and dimensions (area, height, etc.), indicate whether they will be removed or to remain. ❑ All PROPOSED freestanding and attached signs; Provide details including location, size, height, colors, materials and drawing; freestanding signs shall include the street address (numerals) ❑ Comprehensive Sign Program application, as applicable (separate application and fee required). ❑ Reduced signage proposal (8'/2 X 11) (color), if submitting Comprehensive Sign Program application. K. TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY: (Section 4- 202.A.13 and 4- 801.C) Page 6 of 8 IP_520723.1 Include if required by the Traffic Operations Manager or his /her designee or if the proposed development: ■ Will degrade the acceptable level of service for any roadway as adopted in the Comprehensive Plan. tyn7 • Will generate 100 or more new vehicle directional trips per hour and /or 1000 or more new vehicle trips per ■ Will affect a nearby roadway segment and /or intersection with five (5) reportable accidents within the prier twelv�em(12) mgntl4fi o r that is on the City's annual list of most hazardous intersections. N"1'' �..r Trip generation shall be based on the most recent edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineer's (ITE) Trip General Manual. The Traffic Impact Study must be prepared in accordance with a " Scoping Meeting" held with the Traffic Operations Manager and the Planning Department's Development Review Manager or their designee (727 - 562 -4750) Refer to Section 4 -801 C of the Community Development Code for exceptions to this requirement. ❑ Acknowledgement of traffic impact study requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following): Traffic Impact Study is included. The study must include a summary table of pre- and post - development levels of service for all roadway legs and each turning movement at all intersections identified in the Scoping Meeting. Traffic Impact Study is not required. CAUTION — IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 562- 4750. L. FIRE FLOW CALCULATIONS/ WATER STUDY: Provide Fire Flow Calculations. Water Study by a FIRE PROTECTION ENGINEER to assure an adequate water supply is available and to determine if any upgrades are required by the developer due to the impact of this project. The water supply must be able to support the needs of any required fire sprinkler, standpipe and /or fire pump. If a fire pump is required the water supply must be able to supply 150% of its rated capacity. Compliance with the 2004 Florida Fire Prevention Code to include NFPA 13, MFPA 14, NFPA 20, NFPA 291, and MFPA 1142 (Annex H) is required. ❑ Acknowledgement of fire flow calculations /water study requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following): Fire Flow Calculations/Water Study is included. Fire Flow Calculations/Water Study is not required. CAUTION — IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A FIRE FLOW CALCULATIONS/ WATER STUDY AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Fire Prevention Department at (727) 562 -4334. M. SIGNATURE: I, the undersigned, acknowledge that all representations made in this application are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge and authorize City representatives to visit and photograph the property described in tips application, X RYSTALB �A j�CA L, s Ll y: NJR De el ent, ,its P_520723.1 STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS Sworn to and subscribed before me this / day of FGbrusL,. , A.D. 2007 to me and /or by Neil Rauenhors , who is personally known has produced c7.2w9"c -a L �e h fie, , as identification. Notary public, My commission expires: 1/Zia/20400 „ar PIN N=ate f Florida NPage'T of 8 M76921Ex N. AFFIDAVIT TO AUTHORIZE AGENT: 1. Provide names of all property owners on deed — PRINT full names: Crystal Beach Capital, LLC PlANNINk: 01- -- MI'6VIENT CITY OP CLEARWATEIR 2. That (I am /we are) the owner(s) and record title holder(s) of the following described property (address or general location): 301 S. Gulfview Blvd. 3. That this property constitutes the property for which a request for a: (describe request) Amendment to Flexible Development Plan 4. That the undersigned (has /have) appointed and (does /do) appoint: Stephen J. Szabo, III as (his /their) agent(s) to execute any petitions or other documents necessary to affect such petition; 5. That this affidavit has been executed to induce the City of Clearwater, Florida to consider and act on the above described property; 6. That site visits to the property are necessary by City representatives in order to process this application and the owner authorizes City representative to visit and photograph the property described in this application; 7. That (1 /w , e unjrgned butho her y certify that the foregoing is true and correct. Crystal Beach Capital, LLC By: NJR Development, LLC, its Manager Owner Property Owner STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS Property Owner Neil J. Rauenhorst, Manager Property Owner Before me the undersigned, an officer duly commissioned by the laws of the State of Florida, on this day of 2_4107 _ personally appeared !le ff4L R4Ve- "AC2.S T _ who having been first duly sworn Deposes and says that he /she fully understands the contents of the affidavit that he /she signed. oaW P(" Notarc Public State of Florida + N<: `.�omez N,i�ssion DD576921 _........_ ............._..._.__ ........_..._...._....._._..__........_.................._........._.. .._....__....._..........._.... %orn ,R/23/2010 1 Notary Public Signature Notary Seal /Stamp My Commission Expires: P_520723.1 Page a of 8. Exhibit A n ZQ PN(i% 0EP LEGAL DESCRIPTION: A PARCEL OF LAND LYING IN SECTION 8, TOWNSHIP 29, RANGE 15 EAST, PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: LOT 57, LOT 104, THE SOUTH 20.00 FEET OF LOT 56, AND THE SOUTH 20.00 FEET OF LOT 103, OF THE LLOYD- WHITE - SKINNER SUBDIVISION, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 13, PAGE 12, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA. TOGETHER WITH LOT 105, LOT 106, AND THE NORTH HALF OF LOT 107, OF THE LLOYD- WHITE - SKINNER SUBDIVISION, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 13, PAGE 12, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA. TOGETHER WITH LOT 58 AND 59, OF THE LLOYD- WHITE - SKINNER SUBDIVISION, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 13, PAGE 12, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA. TOGETHER WITH THAT PORTION OF THIRD AVENUE A 60.00 FOOT RIGHT - OF -WAY TO BE VACATED. BEING BOUNDED ON THE EAST BY THE WEST RIGHT -OF -WAY LINE OF CORONADO DRIVE, AND ON THE WEST BY THE EAST RIGHT -OF -WAY LINE OF GULF VIEW BOULEVARD, ON THE NORTH BY THE SOUTH PROPERTY LINE OF LOT 57 AND LOT 104, AND THE SOUTH BY THE NORTH PROPERTY LINE OF LOT 58 AND LOT 105. TOGETHER WITH THE EAST 35.00 FEET OF A 70.00 FOOT RIGHT -OF -WAY OF GULF VIEW BOULEVARD TO BE VACATED; BOUNDED ON THE NORTH BY THE WESTERLY EXTENSION OF A LINE LYING 20 FEET NORTH OF AND PARALLEL WITH THE NORTH PROPERTY LINE OF LOTS 57 AND 104, AND ON THE SOUTH BY THE WESTERLY EXTENSION OF THE SOUTH LINE OF LOT 59. LESS AND EXCEPT THE EAST 10.00 FEET THEREOF. CONTAINING 1.563 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. OR BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCE THE THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE SOUTH 20.00 FEET OF LOT 103, OF LLOYD- WHITE - SKINNER SUBDIVISION, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 13, PAGE 12, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA, A FOUND PK NAIL AND DISC L.B. 2610; THENCE, N.83 °54'57 11W., ALONG THE NORTH BOUNDARY OF THE SOUTH 20.00 FEET OF SAID LOT 103, 10.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, A FOUND 1/2" CAPPED IRON ROD L.B. 4513; THENCE S.06 °05'03 "W., 105.06 FEET TO A FOUND 1/2" CAPPED IRON ROD L.B. 4513, ALSO BEING A POINT OF CURVATURE OF A CURVE CONCAVE NORTHWEST AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 6,227.52 FEET; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE TO THE RIGHT, 199.76 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 1 050'27" (CHORD 199.75 FEET, BEARING S.07 °00'17 "W), TO A FOUND 1/2" CAPPED IRON ROD L.B. 4513; THENCE NON - TANGENT FROM SAID CURVE, N.81 059'43 "W., 90.18 FEET TO A FOUND 5/8" CAPPED IRON ROD L.B. 3889, ALSO BEING A POINT ON A NON - TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE NORTHWEST AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 6,127.52 FEET; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE TO THE LEFT, 18.89 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 00 010'36" (CHORD 18.89 FEET, BEARING N.08 °53'38 "E.) TO A FOUND 4 "X4" CONCRETE MONUMENT; THENCE NON - TANGENT FROM SAID CURVE, N.82 015'44 "W., 145.16 FEET TO A POINT ON A NON - TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE NORTHWEST AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 5,982.52 FEET, SAID POINT BEING A FOUND PK NAIL & DISC L.B. 2610; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE TO THE LEFT, 173.68 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL, ANGLE OF 01 °39'48" (CHORD 173.67 FEET, BEARING N.06 °54'57 "E.) TO A FOUND PK NAIL & DISC L.B. 2610, ALSO BEING THE POINT OF TANGENCY; THENCE N.06 °05'03 "E., 105.06 FEET TO A FOUND PK NAIL & DISC L.B. 2610, SAID POINT BEING ON THE NORTH BOUNDARY OF THE SOUTH 20.00 FEET OF LOTS 103 AND 56 EXTENDED; THENCE ALONG SAID NORTH BOUNDARY, S.83 °54'57 "E., 235.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. CONTAINING 1.563 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. ORIGINAL RECEIVED FS 0 2 2007 PLANNING DEPARTME�7 CITY OF CLEARWARk • Wayne M. Wells, AICP Senior Planner City of Clearwater 100 S. Myrtle Avenue P.O. Box 4748 Clearwater, FL 33756 ORIGINAL RECEIVFt-. FEB 02 2007 PLANNING ©Ep /Ak„VoliN ' CITY OF CLEARWAtER January 31, 2007 RE: Aqualea / Hyatt — Deletion of Pedestrian Bridge and Landing DVA2007 -00001 FLD2007 -01001 Dear Wayne: Accompanying this letter is one original and fourteen (14) copies of our revised/amended submittals of the above - referenced applications. The purpose of these applications is to provide the City of Clearwater with the opportunity to delete from the Development Agreement the pedestrian bridge from Aqualea over Gulfview Boulevard and the landing for the pedestrian bridge in the middle of the Sundial Plaza. The original impetus for this offer was our observation of the Planning Department's strong, well thought -out, public objection to the request by the property owner immediately north of our project to construct a bridge over Gulfview Boulevard from his proposed project. Wherever possible, we are trying to be fully supportive of the City's BeachWalk project and upon seeing staff's objection to the bridge from the neighboring parcel, re- examined the need for a bridge from our property. As we have refined the design of Aqualea, we have been able to incorporate minor revisions to the plans that now allow public parkers in the Aqualea garage to take an elevator directly from the garage to ground level and walk directly out onto the BeachWalk Promenade. Prior to the minor revisions, a public parker in the garage could take an elevator only to the pedestrian bridge or the hotel. Since direct elevator access is now available to the ground floor /Beachwalk Promenade, we do not believe the.. pedestrian bridge over Gulfview Boulevard is necessary, or quite frankly, will be used very much, as most beachgoers will choose to simply walk across the street rather than. walk up or down a flight of stairs or wait for a second elevator in the bridge Jandin structure. 101 E. Kennedy Blvd., Suite 2125 • Tampa, Florida 33602 • (813) 226 -9897 • Fax (813) 226 -8747 In place of the pedestrian bridge, we propose that the City revise its existing BeachWalk plans to incorporate a single 45 foot wide crosswalk on Gulfview Boulevard, rather than the two crosswalks currently located on each side of the pedestrian bridge. The crosswalk would be located directly between the Aqualea garage elevators and the Sundial Plaza, providing a clear path of travel to and from the beach for public packers in the garage. The crosswalk would be constructed of the same materials as the other crosswalks on south Gulfview Boulevard and would be marked by four monuments (consistent with other Beachwalk monuments) containing "Walk/Don't Walk" call buttons. Stop bars and rumble strips would be installed directly north and south of the crosswalk and flush mounted lights would border the crosswalk on the north and south edges. In place of a concession facility located within a large bridge landing structure, we will accept a smaller, free standing concession facility. This is the only proposed change to the concession facility. Pursuant to Section 5.04 Paragraph 7 of the Development Agreement, the concession facility shall be no more than 1,200 square feet, MOL, be no higher than one story and shall not display the name Hyatt or any other hotel - related mark on the structure or the facility. There is no actual design for the concession facility at this time. The facility is located within a Velocity Flood Zone and seaward of the Coastal Construction Control Line. We will work with the City of Clearwater staff, and with the appropriate regulatory agencies (with City support as provided in Article 3.02.3 of the Development Agreement) to design a facility that can operate as planned, meet the construction requirements of the governing regulations (or secure waivers or variances from the regulations) and be architecturally consistent with Beachwalk in terms of exterior materials, colors, fabrics, elevations, roof, etc. As provided in Exhibit 1 to Exhibit K of the Development Agreement, the concession facility may offer the following: 1. Rental of beach towels 2. Sale of prepackaged snacks and non - alcoholic beverages 3. Sale of beach sundries 4. Rental of showers and lockers If I can provide you with any additional information, please call. ORIGINAL RFCMvFn FE 5 2 2007 PLANNimc, CITY OF CLEARWATER Sincerely, NJR Development Company yw� Christopher D. Bastas Director of Development 5ptw 1/12/2007 _ Receipt #: 1200700000000000291 4:20:36PM p �= Date: 01/12/2007 r Line Items: Case No Tran Code Description Revenue Account No Amount Paid FLD2007 -01001 04 Flexible Commercial 010 - 341262 1,205.00 Line Item Total: $1,205.00 Payments: Method Payer Initials Check No Confirm No How Received Amount Paid Check NJR DEV CO LLC R_D 3687 In Person 1,205.00 Payment Total: $1,205.00 ORIGINAL RECEWD JAN 18 2006 PLANNING DEPARTIIIENI CITY OF CLEARWATER THIS IS NOT A PERMIT. This is a receipt for an application for a permit. This application will be reviewed and you will be notified as to the outcome of the application. cReceipt.rpt Page 1 of 1 ej CLWCoverSheet 0 risD2 r� • i07 -01001 oov/ FVIEW BLVD I CLEARWATER BEACH HYATT PLANNER OF RECORD: WW ATLAS # UNK ZONING: T LAND USE: RFH RECEIVED: .01/12/2007 INCOMPLETE: COMPLETE: MAPS: PHOTOS: STAFF REPORT: DRC:,,�.. L' I.07 CDB: Z•Lo•a s u PLANNING DEPARTMENT Pos_r OFFIcf, Box 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758 -4748 a MUNICIPAL SI,RVICHS BUILDING, 100 SOUITI MYRTU, AVI?NU@, CLEARW/ATER, FLORIDA 33756 I'IiLliPlfONt: (727) 562 -4567 FAx (727) 562 -4865 LONG RAINCI: PLANNING DIM-10PNIFNT MwII:W February 21, 2007 Mr. Stephen J. Szabo, III 100 North Tampa Street Suite 2700 Tampa, FL 33602 RE: Development Order - Case FLD2007 -01001 229 and 301 South Gulfview Boulevard and 230, 300 and 304 Coronado Drive (Hyatt, aka Aqualea) Dear Mr. Szabo: This letter constitutes a Development Order pursuant to Section 4- 206.D.6 of the Community Development Code. On February 20, 2007, the Community Development Board reviewed your request for Flexible Development approval to permit the elimination of a pedestrian overpass over South Gulfview Boulevard and to permit a standalone concession facility in lieu of the bridge landing area for such concessions for the Hyatt/Aqualea project, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2- 803.C. The Community Development Board (CDB) APPROVED the application with the following Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and Conditions of Approval: Findings of Fact: 1. That 1.56 acres is located between South Gulfview Boulevard and Coronado Drive at Third Street; 2. That the property is located within the Tourist (T) District and the Community Redevelopment District (CRD) Future Land Use Plan category; 3. That the Community Development Board (CDB) originally approved this project on February 20, 2001, under Cases FL 01 -01 -01 and DA 01- 01 -01, permitting a 250 -room hotel; 4. That on November 16, 2004, the CDB approved Case FLD2004- 07052, adding 24 rooms to the hotel and converting those additional rooms to 18 attached dwellings-, 5. That the project is currently under construction; 6. That the approved project included a pedestrian overpass to provide access between the public parking in the hotel parking garage and the beach; 7. That the proposal is for the elimination of the pedestrian overpass on South Gulfview Boulevard-, 8. That elimination of the pedestrian overpass would present a more aesthetically pleasing view, would not block views, would.present a safer interface between motorists and pedestrians, would reduce long -term maintenance of the pedestrian walkway; 9. That the proposal provides for an alternative concession facility as a freestanding building rather than as part of the beach landing portion of the pedestrian overpass; and 10. That there are no outstanding Code Enforcement issues associated with the subject. property. PRANK I I11SISARD. 1%1A) OR JO11 -: ikm: , Col 1:11. ?.ut >11Sr:r 1IOVI' I iA.w1:rON, C,ol XC10ui M1-'lt 1311.1. jon_u)N, COIL \(;!I_�IIf�VHl;if , °;"�, t.:1R!.li.`: A. PI' I CUl "�(:II_AtI:Altil ?It "EQUAI.Ia \ll'LO1'. \11IN'i AND AI vii,.. ?A'i'IVI? ACTTO\ I'.mi,iml-:R" February 21, 2007 Szabo — Page Two Conclusions of Law: 1. That the development proposal is consistent with the Standards as per Tables 2 -801.1 and 2 -803 of the Community Development Code; 2. That the development proposal is consistent with the Flexibility criteria as per Section 2 -803.0 of the Community Development Code; and 3. That the development proposal is consistent with the General Standards for Level Two Approvals as per Section 3 -913 of the Community Development Code. Conditions of Approval: 1. That approval of this Flexible Development case is subject to the approval of a Development Agreement with the City (Case DVA2007- 00001); 2. That the final design of hotel building be consistent . with conceptual elevations submitted and/or modified by the Community Development Board; 3. That the concession facility not exceed 1,200 square feet in area, be one -story in height and its design, materials and color be consistent with the hotel building and with Beach by Design guidelines and be designed to meet FEMA requirements within a.Velocity Flood Zone; 4. That, prior to the issuance of the building permit for the concession facility, the State Department of Environmental Protection approve its location seaward of the Coastal Construction Control Line; and 5. That any modification to the stormwater inlet at the southwest corner of Coronado Drive and the new Second Street be the responsibility of the hotel developer. Pursuant to Section 4 -407, an application for a building permit shall be made within one year of Flexible Development approval (February 20, 2008). All required certificates of occupancy shall be obtained within two years of the date of issuance of the building permit. Time frames do not change with successive owners. The Community Development Coordinator may grant an extension of time for a period not to exceed one year and only within the original period of validity. The Community Development Board may approve one additional extension of time after the community development coordinator's extension to initiate a building permit application. The issuance of this Development Order does not relieve you of the necessity to obtain any building permits or pay any impact fees that may be required. In order to facilitate the issuance of any permit or license affected by this approval, please bring a copy of this letter with you when applying for any permits or licenses that require this prior development approval. Additionally, an appeal of a Level Two approval (Flexible Development) may be initiated pursuant to Section 4 -502.13 by the applicant or by any person granted party status within 14 days of the date of the CDB meeting. The filing of an application/notice of appeal shall stay the effect of the decision pending the final determination of the case. The appeal period for your case expires on March 7, 2007 (14 days from the date of the CDB meeting). If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call Wayne M. Wells, Planner III, at 727 -562 -4504. You can access zoning information for parcels within the City through our website: www.myclearwater.com/gov/depts/plannin t February 21, 2007 Szabo — Page Three Sincerely, Michael Del , ArCP Planning Director S: (Planning DepartmentlCD BIFLEX (FLD)iInactive or Finished ApplicationslGulfview S 0301 Hyatt.Aqualea (T) - ApprovedlGulfview S 301 Development Order 2.21.07.doc Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Friday, February 16, 2007 4:15 PM To: 'Chris Bastas' l, Cc: Maran, Robert (Bob); Rice, Scott; Doherty, Steve Subject: RE: Hyatt - Stormwater Comment 0 Please submit two copies to me as early as possible on Tuesday morning (as it is too late. to do such today; Monday is a holiday and we will not be open for business). I will give one copy to Bob Maran in Stormwater to review. He needs to review and approve prior to the CDB meeting, which is at 1:00 pm on Tuesday. Thanks. - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Chris Bastas [ mailto :chris @njrdevelopment.com] Sent: Friday, February 16, 2007 3:40 PM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: FW: Hyatt - Stormwater Comment I have the revised drawing. What should I do with it? How many copies are needed? Who do I submit to? Christopher D. Bastas Director of Development NJR Development Company, LLC 101 E. Kennedy Boulevard Suite 2125 Tampa, Florida 33602 813 - 226 -9897 (tel) 813 - 226 -8747 (fax) Chris @njrdevelopment.com www.aqualearesort.com - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Wayne.Wells @myClearwater.com [ mailto :Wayne.Wells @myClearwater.com] Sent: Wednesday, February 14, 2007 9:40 AM To: Chris Bastas Cc: Steve.Doherty @myClearwater.com; Scott.Rice @myClearwater,.com Subject: Hyatt - Stormwater Comment Chris - I need for you to deal with this item quickly, as it seems to be an issue for Stormwater Engineering (red was your response): 1. Prior to CDB, the site plan is to show a cross section at the walkway with existing and proposed elevations on NAVD 88 datum. The cross section is to reflect elevations of the roadway, curb and gutter as proposed on the plans for Beach Walk. *Staff is available to assist the developer in creating this cross - section. - Our civil engineer will be contacting staff to make this correction. Wayne 1 Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Thursday, February 15, 2007 9:20 AM To: 'sszabo @foley.com' Cc: 'chris @njrdevelopment.com' Subject: FLD2007 -01001 and DVA2007- 00001, 301 S. Gulfview Blvd. Stephen - Attached is the Staff Report for the above referenced case. Please let me know by 3:00 pm on Friday, February 16, 2007, as to whether the conditions of approval for the FLD case are acceptable or not. If the conditions of approval on the FLD case are acceptable, this case will be placed on the Consent portion of the CDB agenda. We so far, do not have any letters of objection to the requests. This case will be heard by the CDB on February 20, 2007, at 1:00 pm at City Hall. It is noted that the DVA case is scheduled for the March 1, 2007, City Council meeting, at 6:00 pm in City Hall. Wayne LJ..11 Gulfview S 301 Gulfview S 301 Staff Report.do... Development Agr... Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Wednesday, February 14, 2007 9:50 AM To: 'Chris Bastas' Subject: RE: Hyatt - Stormwater Comment If by "write -up ", do you mean the Staff reports for the FLD and DVA cases? If so, then they will not be available until Thursday (will email to you). - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Chris Bastas [ mailto :chris @njrdevelopment.com] Sent: Wednesday, February 14, 2007 9:45 AM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: RE: Hyatt - Stormwater Comment Will follow -up and get back to you later today. Is staff's "write -up" regarding our proposed changes available today? Is it on line? Can it be emailed to me? Do I need to stop by MSB to review? Thank you Christopher D. Bastas Director of Development NJR Development Company, LLC 101 E. Kennedy Boulevard Suite 2125 Tampa, Florida 33602 813- 226 -9897 (tel) 813 - 226 -8747 (fax) Chris @njrdevelopment.com www.aqualearesort.com - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Wayne.Wells @myClearwater.com [ mailto :Wayne.Wells@myClearwater.com] Sent: Wednesday, February 14, 2007 9:40 AM To: Chris Bastas Cc: Steve.Doherty @myClearwater.com; Scott.Rice @myClearwater.com Subject: Hyatt - Stormwater Comment Chris - I need for you to deal with this item quickly, as it seems to be an issue for Stormwater Engineering (red was your response): 1. Prior to CDB, the site plan is to show a cross section at the walkway with existing and proposed elevations on NAVD 88 datum. The cross section is to reflect elevations of the roadway, curb and gutter as proposed on the plans for Beach Walk. *Staff is available to assist the developer in creating this cross - section. - Our civil engineer will be contacting staff to make this correction. Wayne 1 Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Wednesday, February 14, 2007 9:40 AM To: 'chris @njrdevelopment.com' Cc: Doherty, Steve; Rice, Scott Subject: Hyatt - Stormwater Comment • Chris - I need for you to deal with this item quickly, as it seems to be an issue for Stormwater Engineering (red was your response): 1. Prior to CDB, the site plan is to show a cross section at the walkway with existing and proposed elevations on NAVD 88 datum. The cross section is to reflect elevations of the roadway, curb and gutter as proposed on the plans for Beach Walk. *Staff is available to assist the developer in creating this cross - section. - our civil engineer will be contacting staff to make this correction. Wayne 1 February 12, 2007 Wayne-M. -Wells, -AICP Senior Planner City of Clearwater 100 S. Myrtle Avenue P.O. Box 4748 Clearwater, FL 33756 RE:- Aqualea I. Hyatt — 2 °d Street -Storm.-Inlet _ DVA2007 -00001 FLD2007 -01001 Dear Wayne: On behalf of Crystal Beach Capital, please accept this letter as our acknowledgement that in the event the existing storm inlet on the south side of the future Second Street needs to be modified in order to accommodate a solid waste truck, such modification shall be our responsibility. If I can provide you with any additional information, please call. Sincerely, NJR Development Company 66 ej-- � zII- Christopher D. Bastas :Director of Development . ORIGINAL. RECEIVED D=EB 14 2007 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER 101 E. Kennedy Blvd., Suite 2125 • Tampa, Florida 33602 • (813) 226 -9897 • Fax (813) 226 -8747 F • Wells, Wayne From: Chris Bastas [chris @njrdevelopment.com] Sent: Monday, February 12, 2007 5:34 PM To: Doherty, Steve; Wells, Wayne Cc:. Rice, Scott; Randy Gibbons Subject: RE: FLD2007-01 001 /DVA2007-00001 301 S. Gulfview Blvd. Wayne, Storm Inlet letter — original to follow via regular mail. Christopher D. Bastas Director of Development NJR Development Company, LLC 101 E. Kennedy Boulevard Suite 2125 Tampa, Florida 33602 813 - 226 -9897 (tel) 813 - 226 -8747 (fax) Chris .nirdevelopment.com www.agualearesort.com From: Steve.Doherty@myClearwater.com [mailto: Steve .Doherty@myClearwater.com] Sent: Monday, February 12, 2007 3:45 PM To: Chris Bastas; Wayne.Wells @myClearwater.com Cc: Scott.Rice @myClearwater.com; Randy Gibbons Subject: RE: FLD2007- 01001 /DVA2007 -00001 301 S. Gulfview Blvd. Engineering: Please address this comment in a letter to Wayne Wells, planner in charge of this case. 2/12/2007 Page 1 of 1 C February 12, 2007 Wayne M. Wells, AICP Senior Planner City of Clearwater 100 S. Myrtle Avenue P.O. Box 4748 Clearwater, FL 33756 RE: ,4Aqualea / Hyatt — 2 °d Street Storm Inlet DVA2007 -00001 FL.D2007 -01001 Dear Wayne: On behalf of Crystal Beach Capital, please accept this letter as our acknowledgement that in the event the existing storm inlet on the south side of the future Second Street needs to be modified in order to accommodate a solid waste truck,, such modification shall be our responsibility. If I can. provide you with any additional information, please call. Sincerely, NJR Development Company 640- -n i Christopher D. Bastas Director of Development 101 13, Kemiedv Blvd., Suite 2125 o Tampa, Florida 33602 a (813) 226 -9897 o Fax (8l3) 226 -8747 Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Monday, February 12, 2007 3:56 PM To: 'Chris Bastas' Cc: Rice, Scott; Doherty, Steve; Randy Gibbons Subject: RE: FLD2007- 01001/DVA2007 -00001 301 S. Gulfview Blvd. Chris - • Page 1 of 3 I already have had two CDB members pick up their site plan packages for cases on their next agenda, as they will be out of town now or later in the week, and have no ability to get them any revised sheet prior to the meeting. To me, the revised Sheet A3.00 needs to be part of the plans submitted for the building permit. Any acknowledgements can be by letter. Wayne - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Chris Bastas [ mailto :chris @njrdevelopment.com] Sent: Monday, February 12, 2007 2:44 PM To: Wells, Wayne Cc: Rice, Scott; Doherty, Steve; Randy Gibbons Subject: RE: FLD2007- 01001/DVA2007 -00001 301 S. Gulfview Blvd. Wayne, My comments are below in Red and on the attached drawing #A3.00. Please review both and confirm that I am making the modifications as requested. How many.revised copies of the plan are needed and when are they needed by? Thank you, Christopher D. Bastas Director of Development NJR Development Company, LLC 101 E. Kennedy Boulevard Suite 2125 Tampa, Florida 33602 813 - 226 -9897 (tel) 813 - 226 -8747 (fax) Chris @njrdevelopment.com www.aqualearesort.com - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Wayne.Wells @myClearwater.com [ mailto :Wayne.Wells @myClearwater.com] Sent: Thursday, February 08, 2007 12:00 PM To: Chris Bastas Cc: Scott.Rice @myClearwater.com; Steve.Doherty @myClearwater.com Subject: FLD2007- 01001 /DVA2007 -00001 301 S. Gulfview Blvd. Chris - I am forwarding the following to you to respond to the Engineering and 2/12/2007 t Page 2 of 3 • Stormwater comments. Thanks. Wayne • - - - -- Original Message - - - -- • From: Doherty, Steve • Sent: Thursday, February 08, 2007 9:23 AM • To: Wells, Wayne • Cc: Rice, Scott • Subject: FW: FLD2007- 01001 /DVA2007 -00001 301 S. Gulfview Blvd. > I am sending you this message again to amplify our concerns regarding the Stormwater and Engineering comments. Please note we are asking that these two comments be addressed by the applicant prior to CDB. > Thanks, > Steve > Engineering > 1. There is a storm inlet in Second Street at the access to the trash compactor. Any modification to the inlet needed to accommodate a solid waste truck is the responsibility, of the developer. > * Please acknowledge prior to CDB - Acknowledged. How do I formally document this acknowledgement? Should I send a letter to Scott? > Storm Water > 1. Prior to CDB, the site plan is to show a cross section at the walkway with existing and proposed elevations on NAVD 88 datum. The cross section is to reflect elevations of the roadway, curb and gutter as proposed on the plans for Beach Walk. > *Staff is available to assist the developer in creating this cross - section. - Our civil engineer will be contacting staff to make this correction. > I have reviewed the resubmission for the above referenced item and the following concerns need to be addressed: > Traffic Engineering: > 1. Show on the plan the proposed pavement markings and signage for the crosswalk on Gulfview Boulevard. > * Applicant has shown the cross walk but stop bar and rumble strips are not needed. Signage, pavement markings and lighting will be more completely addressed via the building permitting process. - Confirm attached marked -up plan complies with staff request, or mark -up correctly. > 2. Show on the plan crosswalk markings with ADA standard ramps for sidewalks along Gulfview Blvd. and Coronado Dr., crossing Second Street per FDOT index 304. 2/12/2007 i—„ t. • � Page 3 of 3 > *The north /south crossings are acceptable as indicated on the revised plans; However the crosswalks shown crossing Coronado Drive shall be deleted. - Confirm attached marked -up plan complies with staff request, or mark -up correctly. > 3. Show on the plan pedestrian pathway from sidewalk on south side of Second St. to the employee's entrance. . > *Traffic Engineering's comment intended that the applicant provide pedestrian access from the sidewalk immediately west of the drive adjacent to the employee's entrance only - not to extend a general pedestrian path across the truck loading and compactor areas. - Confirm attached marked -up plan complies with staff request, or mark -up correctly. > 4. Depict a "stop -bar" 4 -feet behind the cross walks on Coronado Dr. and Second St. exit drives with stop signs and "rumble strips" on the ramps preceding the stop signs. > * The stop signs and rumble strips need to be shown on the building plans. Crosswalk design shall be coordinated with Traffic Engineering. We can't figure out what this comment is referring to. It appears to us we have shown the stop bar and rumble strip as requested by staff. Please mark -up attached plan as staff wants it to appear: > The above items shall be addressed prior to the issuance of a building permit. > > Stephen L. Doherty > Engineering Specialist I > steve.doherty@myclearwater.com > (727) 562 -4773 2/12/2007 ;� � � , � • Page 1 of 3 Wells, Wayne From: Doherty, Steve Sent: Monday, February 12, 2007 3:45 PM To: 'Chris Bastas'; Wells, Wayne Cc: Rice, Scott; Randy Gibbons Subject: RE: FLD2007- 01001/DVA2007 -00001 301 S. Gulfview Blvd. J Engineering: Please address this comment in a letter to Wayne Wells, planner in charge of this case. Stormwater: Please have your engineer contact Bob Maran. Office phone number is (727) 562 -4750. As a reminder, please note this is a revision required prior to the CDB meeting scheduled for February 20th. Traffic Engineering: # 1. Mark -up o.k. # 2 Mark -up o.k. # 3 Mark -up o.k. # 4. Use of rumble strips is a warning to vehicles inside the parking garage on ramps to slow down. Please show rumble strips at the transition point between 13.4 % slope and 7% slope point before exit to Coronado Drive. The rumble strips will not be required at the Second Street exit from the building as there is no ramp at that location. Lastly, please delete the rumble strips located between the stop bars and crosswalks. Stephen L. Doherty Engineering Specialist I steve.doherty @myclearwater.com (727) 562 -4773 - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Chris Bastas [mailto:chris @njrdevelopment.com] Sent: Monday, February 12, 2007 2:44 PM To: Wells, Wayne Cc: Rice, Scott; Doherty, Steve; Randy Gibbons Subject: RE: FLD2007- 01001/DVA2007 -00001 301 S. Gulfview Blvd. Wayne, My comments are below in Red and on the attached drawing #A3.00. Please review both and confirm that I am making the modifications as requested. How many revised copies of the plan are needed and when are they needed by? Thank you, Christopher D. Bastas Director of Development NJR Development Company, LLC 101 E. Kennedy Boulevard 2/12/2007 Page 2 of 3 Suite 2125 Tampa, Florida 33602 813 - 226 -9897 (tel) 813 - 226 -8747 (fax) Chris @njrdevelopment.com www.aqualearesort.com - - - -- Original Message - - - -- From: Wayne.Wells @myClearwater.com [ mailto :Wayne.Wells @myClearwater.com] Sent: Thursday, February 08, 2007 12:00 PM To: Chris Bastas Cc: Scott.Rice @myClearwater.com; Steve.Doherty @myClearwater.com Subject: FLD2007- 01001 /DVA2007 -00001 301 S. Gulfview Blvd. Chris - I am forwarding the following to you to respond to the Engineering and Stormwater comments. Thanks. Wayne • - - - -- Original Message - - - -- • From: Doherty, Steve • Sent: Thursday, February 08, 2007 9:23 AM • To: Wells, Wayne • Cc: Rice, Scott • Subject: FW: FLD2007- 01001 /DVA2007 =00001 301 S. Gulfview Blvd. > I am sending you this message again to amplify our concerns regarding the Stormwater and Engineering comments. Please note we are asking that these two comments be addressed by the applicant prior to CDB. > > Thanks, > Steve > Engineering > 1. There is a storm inlet in Second Street at the access to the trash compactor. Any modification to the inlet needed to accommodate a solid waste truck is the responsibility of the developer. > * Please acknowledge prior to CDB - Acknowledged. How do I formally document this acknowledgement? Should I send a letter to Scott? > Storm Water > 1. Prior to CDB, the site plan is to show a cross section at the walkway with existing and proposed elevations on NAVD 88 datum. The cross section is to reflect elevations of the roadway, curb and gutter as proposed on the plans for Beach Walk. > *Staff is available to assist the developer in creating this cross - section. - Our civil engineer will be contacting staff to make this correction. > > 2/12/2007 „. . r 0 . Page 3 of 3 > I have reviewed the resubmission for the above referenced item and the following concerns need to be addressed: >, Traffic Engineering: > 1. Show on the plan the proposed pavement markings and signage for the crosswalk on Gulfview Boulevard.. > * Applicant has shown the'cross walk but stop bar and rumble strips are not needed. Signage, pavement markings and lighting will be more completely addressed via the building permitting process. - Confirm attached marked -up plan complies with staff request, or mark -up correctly. > 2. Show on the plan crosswalk markings with ADA standard ramps for sidewalks along Gulfview Blvd. and Coronado Dr., crossing Second Street per FDOT index 304. > *The north /south crossings are acceptable as indicated on the revised plans; However the crosswalks shown crossing Coronado Drive shall be deleted. - Confirm attached marked -up plan complies with staff request, or mark -up correctly. > 3. Show on the plan pedestrian pathway from sidewalk on south side-of Second St. to the employee's entrance. > *Traffic Engineering's comment intended that.the applicant provide pedestrian access from the sidewalk immediately west of the drive adjacent to the employee's entrance only - not to extend a general pedestrian path across the truck loading and compactor areas. - Confirm attached marked -up plan complies with staff request, or mark -up correctly. > .4. Depict a "stop -bar” 4 -feet behind the cross walks on Coronado Dr. and Second St. exit drives with stop signs and "rumble strips" on the ramps preceding the stop signs. > * The stop signs and rumble strips need to be shown on the building plans. Crosswalk design shall be coordinated with Traffic Engineering. We can't figure out what this comment is referring to. It appears to us we have shown the stop bar and rumble strip as requested by staff. Please mark -up attached plan as staff wants it to appear. > The above items shall be addressed prior to the issuance of a building permit. > > > Stephen L. Doherty > Engineering Specialist I > steve.doherty @myclearwater.com > (727) 5 62 -4 773 2/12/2007 Wells, Wayne From: Clayton, Gina Sent: Monday, February 12, 2007 4:48 PM To: Akin, Pam Cc: Dewitt, Gina; Wells, Wayne Subject: RE: Hyatt DVA We are sending out the CDB packet on Wed. afternoon so if there are changes I would like to send the revised agreement to the CDB. - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Akin, Pam Sent: Monday, February 12, 2007 4:31 PM To: Clayton, Gina Cc: Dewitt, Gina; Wells, Wayne Subject: RE: Hyatt DVA I need to look at the concession agreement . They are not proposing changes, how ever some may be needed because the bridge is going away Pamela Akin, City Attorney 112 5. Osceola Ave Clearwater, Florida 33758 727 562 -4010 - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Clayton, Gina Sent: Monday, February 12, 2007 4:28 PM To: Akin, Pam Cc: Dewitt, Gina; Wells, Wayne Subject: RE: Hyatt DVA Okay - if the changes require any changes in our cover memo - we'll have to have the cover memo rejected and sent back to us. - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Akin, Pam Sent: Monday, February 12, 2007 4:22 PM To: Clayton, Gina Cc: Dewitt, Gina; Wells; Wayne Subject: RE: Hyatt DVA I am revising this and may have additional changes I will get back to you tommorrow Pamela Akin, City Attorney 112 5. Osceola Ave Clearwater, Florida 33758 727 562 -4010 - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Clayton, Gina Sent: Monday, February 12, 2007 4:18 PM To: Akin, Pam Cc: Dewitt, Gina; Wells, Wayne Subject: Hyatt DVA The Hyatt DVA should be en route to you. We do not have an electronic copy of the final agreement. Could you please attach it in Muniagenda and also send us one for our files? Thanks. 1 Gina L. Clayton Assistant Planning Director City of Clearwater gina.clayton@myclearwater.com 727- 562 -4587 Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Thursday, February 08, 2007 12:00 PM To: 'chris @njrdevelopment.com' Cc: Rice, Scott; Doherty, Steve Subject: FLD2007- 01001 /DVA2007 -00001 301 S. Gulfview Blvd. Chris - I am forwarding the following to you to respond to the Engineering and Stormwater comments. Thanks. Wayne - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Doherty, Steve Sent: Thursday, February 08, 2007 9:23 AM To: Wells, Wayne Cc: Rice, Scott Subject: FW: FLD2007- 01001 /DVA2007- 00001301 S. Gulfview Blvd. am sending you this message again to amplify our concerns regarding the Stormwater and Engineering comments. Please note we are asking that these two comments be addressed by the applicant prior to CDB. Thanks, Steve Engineering 1. There is a storm inlet in Second Street at the access to the trash compactor. Any modification to the inlet needed to accommodate a solid waste truck is the responsibility of the developer. * Please acknowledge prior to CDB Storm Water 1. Prior to CDB, the site plan is to show a cross section at the walkway with existing and proposed elevations on NAVD 88 datum. The cross section is to reflect elevations of the roadway, curb and gutter as proposed on the plans for Beach Walk. *Staff is available to assist the developer in creating this cross - section. I have reviewed the resubmission for the above referenced item and the following concerns need to be addressed: Traffic Engineering: 1. Show on the plan the proposed pavement markings and signage for the crosswalk on Gulfview Boulevard. * Applicant has shown the cross walk but stop bar and rumble strips are not needed. Signage, pavement markings and lighting will be more completely addressed via the building permitting process. 2. Show on the plan crosswalk markings with ADA standard ramps for sidewalks along Gulfview Blvd. and Coronado Dr., crossing Second Street per FDOT index 304. *The north /south crossings are acceptable as indicated on the revised plans; However the crosswalks shown crossing Coronado Drive shall be deleted. 3. Show on the plan pedestrian pathway from sidewalk on south side of Second St. to the employee's entrance. ..a 0 *Traffic Engineering's comment intended that the applicant provide pedestrian access from the sidewalk immediately west of the drive adjacent to the employee's entrance only - not to extend a general pedestrian path across the truck loading and compactor areas. 4. Depict a "stop -bar" 4 -feet behind the cross walks on Coronado Dr. and Second St. exit drives with stop signs and "rumble strips" on the ramps preceding the stop signs. * The stop signs and rumble strips need to be shown on the building plans. Crosswalk design shall be coordinated with Traffic Engineering. The above items shall be addressed prior to the issuance of a building permit. Stephen L. Doherty Engineering Specialist I steve.doherty @myclearwater.com (727) 562 -4773 0 W Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Tuesday, February 06, 2007 11:31 AM To: 'chris @njrdevelopment.com' Subject: FLD2007 -01001 - Hyatt Chris - For the packages that are going out to the CDB, I need for you to resubmit 15 sets of Sheets A -9.00, A -9.01, A -9.02 and A -9.03 (the elevation sheets). Due to a CDB member going out of town, could you please have these plans in by 10 am on Thursday, February 8, 2007? Will be in touch tomorrow if any other changes to plans /documents are necessary, based on other departments' reviews. Thanks. Wayne Page 1 of 1 Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Tuesday, February 06, 2007 8:55 AM To: 'Chris Bastas' Cc: Delk, Michael; Brumback, Garry Subject: Aqualea Submittals Chris - 1. Yes, your resubmittals were received on time last Friday. 2. Departments are reviewing the resubmittals. I will let you know no later than tomorrow if there are any changes necessary to what has been submitted. 3. Both the,FLD and DVA cases are scheduled for the February 20th CDB meeting and the DVA is scheduled for the March 1 st City Council meeting. Wayne - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Chris Bastas [ mailto :chris @njrdevelopment.com] Sent: Monday, February 05, 2007 9:37 AM To: Wells, Wayne Cc: Delk, Michael; Brumback, Garry Subject: Aqualea Submittals Wayne, Just following up to confirm that 1. Our submittals were received on time last Friday afternoon, and 2. We have responded fully to the comments made by staff, and 3. We are scheduled for CDB on February 20 and City Council on March 1 Thank you Christopher D. Bastas Director of Development NJR Development Company, LLC 101 E. Kennedy Boulevard Suite 2125 Tampa, Florida 33602 813 - 226 -9897 (tel) 813 - 226 -8747 (fax) Chris(a)nirdevelopment.com www.aqualearesort.com 2/6/2007 FW: Message received from 624865 on 01/29/2007 at 11:24:07 AM. Page 1 of 1 Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Monday, January 29, 2007 1:19 PM To: 'Szabo, Stephen J.' Subject: RE: Message received from 7275624865 on 01/29/2007 at 11:24:07 AM. We have reserved 15 minutes in case you needed to come over. If you are clear on what is needed, continue on and don't come at that time. We will take a 15- minute break. Thanks. - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Szabo, Stephen J. [mailto:SSzabo @foley.com] Sent: Monday, January 29, 2007 11:39 AM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: FW: Message received from 7275624865 on 01/29/2007 at 11:24:07 AM. Pls see attached. I thought we were not going to have a hearing .on the 1 st since I received comments already? From: GenifaxMessageServer [mailto:aenifaxmessageserver� Sent: Monday, January 29, 2007 11:26 AM To: Szabo, Stephen J. Subject: Message received from 7275624865 on 01/29/2007 at 11:24:07 AM. The attached fax was received from 7275624865 on 01/29/2007.at 11:24:07 AM. JobID: 131359 <<Fax - Jan -29- 2007- 11- 24- 07- 0007.pdf>> The preceding email message may be confidential or protected by the attorney - client privilege. It is not intended for transmission to, or receipt by, any unauthorized persons. If you have received this message in error, please (i) do not read it, (ii) reply to the sender that you received the message in error, and (iii) erase or destroy the message. Legal advice contained in the preceding message is solely for the benefit of the Foley & Lardner LLP client(s) represented by the Firm in the particular matter that is the subject of this message, and may not be relied upon by any other party. Internal Revenue Service regulations require that certain types of written advice include a disclaimer. To the extent the preceding message contains advice relating to a Federal tax issue, unless expressly stated otherwise the advice is not intended or written to be used, and it cannot be used by the recipient or any other taxpayer, for the purpose of avoiding Federal tax penalties, and was not written to support the promotion or marketing of any transaction or matter discussed herein. 1/29/2007 _ y FROM • FAX NO. :7275624865 .Jan. 29 2007 12:31PM P1 LL u ater FAX COVER MEMO, CITY or cr.EARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT 100 S. MYRTLE A.'VE., 2 o Floor CL,EARWATER, FL. 33756 (727) 562 -4567. FAX: (727) 562 -4865 • SiJI3.TFGT: We �e'e -r/, I T � / NUMBER OF PiiGFS(CNCI.AJDJNG THIS PAGF,) -- — Wells, Wayne I•J From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Friday, January 26, 2007 2:38 PM To: 'sszabo @foley.com' , Subject: FLD2007- 01001, 229 and 301 South Gulfview Boulevard and 230, 300 and 304 Coronado Drive (Hyatt, aka Aqualea) Stephen - I am forwarding this email to you as a correction to those DRC comments previously sent to you (see below). Thanks. Wayne - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Doherty, Steve Sent: Friday, January 26, 2007 2:12 PM To: Wells, Wayne; 'sszabo @foley.com' Subject: RE: FLD2007- 01001, 229 and 301 South Gulfview Boulevard and 230, 300 and 304 Coronado Drive (Hyatt, aka Aqualea) Wayne, I discovered a typo in Traffic Engineering condition # 4. This condition requires the applicant to show a pedestrian path on the north side of Second Street. This message is to advise the applicant that the ped path is to be located on the south side of Second Street. have made the correction in Permit Plan and apologize for any confusion this may have caused. Thanks, Stephen L. Doherty Engineering Specialist I steve.doherty @myclearwater.com (727) 562 -4773 - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Thursday, January 25, 2007 6:14 PM To: 'sszabo @foley.com' Cc: Albee, Rick; Buysse, Beverly A.; Buzzell, William; Doherty, Steve; Dougall- Sides, Leslie; Everitt, Steven; Glenn, Tom; Gluski, Roberta; Kader, Art; Keller, James; Kurleman, Scott; Morris, William D.; Reid, Debbie; Rice, Scott; Rickard, Leonard; Schodtler, John; Tefft, Robert; Thompson, Neil; Watkins, Sherry' Subject: FLD2007- 01001, 229 and 301 South Gulfview Boulevard and 230, 300 and 304 Coronado Drive (Hyatt, aka Aqualea) Stephen - The DRC has reviewed the submitted Flexible Development application. Attached are the DRC comments that need to be addressed in an amended application and /or documents /plans for this case. While this case has been scheduled for the February 1, 2007, DRC meeting, it is not our intentions to meet with you on that day, since this is being fast - tracked to CDB (meaning, I can't wait that long). Should you have any questions regarding any of the comments, please contact me so that I can direct you to the appropriate person in the department you have concerns with the comments made. Please submit one original application and document, along with 14 copies, amended to reflect the attached comments by noon, Friday, February 2, 2007. This case has been scheduled for the February 20, 2007, Community Development Board (CDB) meeting at 1:00 pm in Council Chambers, 3rd Floor, City Hall, 112 S. Osceola Avenue, Clearwater, FL. Wayne 727 - 562 -4504 « File: draft 2.1.07 dre action agenda.pdf >> 2 • Page 1 of 1 Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Friday, January 26, 2007 12:30 PM To: 'Chris Bastas' Subject: RE: Aqualea - FLD2007 -01001 Responses should be to what this specific request is (not the original). If this request involves more than the elimination of the bridge, then the responses also need to respond to those other portions of the request (permitting the two driveways for the mobile kitchens and anything else ? ?). - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Chris Bastas [ mailto :chris @njrdevelopment.com] Sent: Friday, January 26, 2007 12:17 PM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: Aqualea - FLD2007 -01001 Wayne, Would you please clarify how we should answer comments 18 and 19 re: General Applicability questions and Comprehensive Infill questions? Should we answer them in the context of the overall project (i.e. just repeat what was on the original application for the project) - or should we answer as applies only to the elimination of the bridge? Thank you Christopher D. Bastas Director of Development NJR Development Company, LLC 101 E. Kennedy Boulevard Suite 2125 Tampa, Florida 33602 813 - 226 -9897 (tel) 813 - 226 -8747 (fax) Chris .nirdevelopment.com www.aqualearesort.com 1/28/2007 Page 1 of 1 Wells, Wayne From: Chris Bastas [chris @njrdevelopment.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 31, 2007 4:12 PM To: Wells, Wayne Cc: Delk, Michael; Brumback, Garry; Neil J. Rauenhorst Subject: Aqualea /Hyatt - Request to delete bridge Wayne, We tried to have all the revised plans available today ... but didn't make it. Attached is a "draft" of our intentions /responses to DRC comments, along with the explanatory letter that was requested. We believe the comments were clear and that we can address all issues to the city's satisfaction. Nonetheless, I will plan on being at the DRC meeting at 11:00am tomorrow to answer any questions. Thank you for your help. Christopher D. Bastas Director of Development NJR Development Company, LLC 101 E. Kennedy Boulevard Suite 2125 Tampa, Florida 33602 813 - 226 -9897 (tel) 813 - 226 -8747 (fax) Chris njrdevelopment.com www.agualearesort.com 1/31/2007 • Michael Delk, AICP Planning Director City of Clearwater 100 S. Myrtle Avenue P.O. Box 4748 Clearwater, FL 33756 0 =ember 9_QAA�& CW�e_ RE: Aqualea / Hyatt — Deletion of Pedestrian Bridge and Landing DVA2007 -00001 FLD2007 -01001 Dear Michael: Accompanying this letter are copies of our revised submittals of the above - referenced applications, reflecting our responses to the DRC's comments to the original applications. The purpose of these applications is to provide the City of Clearwater with the opportunity to delete from the Development Agreement the pedestrian bridge from Aqualea over Gulfview Boulevard and the landing for the pedestrian bridge in the middle of the sundial plaza. The original impetus for this offer was our observation of the Planning Department's strong, public objection to the request by the property owner immediately north of our project to construct a bridge over Gulfview Boulevard from his proposed project. Wherever possible, we are trying to be fully supportive of the City's. BeachWalk project and upon seeing staff's objection to the bridge from the neighboring parcel, re- examined the need for a bridge from our property. As we have refined the design of Aqualea, we have been able to incorporate minor revisions to the plans that now allow public parkers to take an elevator directly from the garage to ground level and walk directly out onto the BeachWalk Promenade. Previously, a public parker in the garage could take an elevator only to the pedestrian bridge or the hotel. Since direct access is now available to ground floor / Beachwalk Promenade, we do not believe the pedestrian bridge over Gulfview Boulevard is necessary, or quite frankly, will be used very much, as most people will simply walk across the street rather than walk up or down a flight of stairs or wait for a second elevator in the bridge landing structure. 1� In place of the pedestrian bridge, we propose that the City revise its existing BeachWalk plans to incorporate a single 45 foot wide crosswalk, rather than the two crosswalks currently located on each side of the bridge. The crosswalk would be located directly between the elevators and the sundial plaza, providing a clear path of travel to and from the beach for public parkers in the garage. The crosswalk would be constructed of the same materials as the other crosswalks on south Gulfview Boulevard and would be marked by four monuments (consistent with other Beachwalk monuments) containing "Walk/Don't Walk" call buttons. Stop bars and rumble strips would be installed directly north and south of the crosswalk and flush mounted lights would border the crosswalk on the north and south edges. If I can provide you with any additional information, please call. Sincerely, NJR Development Company Christopher D. Bastas Director of Development r q - It • • d 11:00 am Case Number: FLD2007 -01001 — 301 S GULFVIEW BLVD Owner(s): CnIstal Beach Capital LLC 101 E Kennedy Blvd Suite 2125 Tampa, F133602 TELEPHONE: No Phone. FAX: No Fax, E -MAIL: No Email Representative: Stephen J Szabo Iii 100 N Tampa St Suite 2700 Tampa, F133602 TELEPHONE: 813 - 225 - 4193,_ FAX /No Fax, E -MAIL: No Email Location: 1.63 acres located between South GuIA7new Boulevard and Coronado Drive at Third Street Atlas Page: UNK Zoning District: T, Tourist Request: Flexible Development approyal4o p rout the ell unuiation of a pedestrian overpass over South Gulfi;iew Boulevard and to permit a stand alone,coi cession facility in lieu of the bridge landing area for sucb�concessiois for the Hyatt/Aqualea- project, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project; under the provisions of Section 2- 803.C. Proposed Use: Mixed use U U Neighborhood Association(s): Z P O Box 82 Clearwater, Neighborhood Association(s): Jim - -100 Devon Dr Clearwater, Fl 33 No Fati-E -MAIL: No Email AX: No Fax. E -MAIL: :,Cite: Wayne - Wells, Neil Thompson, Scott Rice, Steve Doherty-. Bastas The DRC renewed this application with the following comments: 1 . Sho�ti on the plan the location of the Coastal Constriction Control Line C.C.C.L.) and the relative location of the proposed concessions building. NOTE: A Florida D.E.P. permit is required for am, construction seaward of the C.C.C.L. CCCL line will be shown. Acknowledge need for D.E. P. permit. 2. Show sidewalk along Second Street (By Others). Sidewalk Mll be shown. 3. There is a stornn inlet in Second Street at the access to the trash compactor. Any modifications to the inlet needed to acconuuodate a solid waste truck is the responsibility of the developer. Acknowledged. Environmental: 1 . No issues Fire: The sole purpose of this application is to eliminate the planned pedestrian bridge over Gulfriew Boulevad and the associated planned landing in the middle of the sundial 0 . plaza. We .do not wish to address the mobile kitchen issue at this time. We acknowledge that anything Ave do on level one adjacent to the Beach«valk Promenade must comply with all applicable codes and regulations, or we must obtain wyaiyers, variances, etc. from the controlling authorities. 1 . Show the U.L. listing of having a MOBILE KITCHEN INSIDE a building. Examples that were demonstrated were for outdoor use. Acknowledge PRIOR to CDB. 2. Mobile Kitchen inside of t e building, how will these units meet the requirements of NFPA 9XYStandard for ventilation control and fire protection of connnercial cooking operations Acknowledge PRIOR to CDB 3 . Mobile Kitchen on the South End has an EXIT from the inside of the building passing through it with fire separation hoiV do you keep the fire separation in this esit corridor, e_-xits cannot pass through a kitchen? Ackno�yledge PRIOR to CDB r' Harbor Master: f 1 . No issues. Legal: 1 . No issues. Land Resources: 1 . No Issues. 1 Landscaping: "�, 1 . No issues.1 Parks and R reatiou: - - - -``~ 'I- No issues ` � Stormy °\ ater: \ \� t i f, 1 . Prior to CDB, the site plan is to showy a cross section at the walkway with ` eisting and proposed elevations on NAVD 88 datum. The cross section is to reflect elevations of the roadway,curb and gutter as proposed on the plans for Beach Wa11L Cross section will be provided. Solid Waste: No Connuents Traffic Engineering: 1. Show on the plan the proposed pavement markings and signage for the crosswalk on Gulfi-ieiy Boulevard. Plan will be revised as requested. 2. Eliminate the two driveways along GuMiew Boulevard. Note: The northerly driveway does not meet 125' minuuum distance between driveway. and intersection per Community- Development Code Sec. 3 -102 C.3. The two driveways will be eliminated. 0 • 3. Shoat- on the plan crosswalk markings with ADA standard ramps for sidewalks along Gulf<-iew Blvd. and Coronado Dr., crossing Second Street per FDOT index 304. Plan will be revised as requested. 4. Show on the plan pedestrian pathway from side«-alk on south side of Second St. to the employee's entrance. The portion of the pathway in the drivewav shall be located as close to the curb -line as possible to afford greater visibility for vehicles exiting the building. Plan will be revised as requested. 5. Show on the plan ramps and a pedestrian crosswalk in front of vehicular ingress/egress drives on Coronado Dr. The crosswalk and ramps shall be positioned as close to the curb -line as possible to afford greater visibility for vehicles exiting the building. Plan will be revised'as requested. 6. Show on the plan a "stop -bar" 4 -feet behind the cross walks on Coronado Dr. and Second St. exit drives with stop sighs and "rumble strips" on the ramps preceding the stop signs. Plan Avili,berevised as requested. The above items shall be addressed-prioi;to the issuance of a building permit. General Note(s): 1. DRC review, is a prerequi�ie for Building Permit Reviev additional comments may be forthconung upon,subini6M of a Building Permit Application. Acknowledged. Planning: 1 . Provide on Page 1 of the applicatioih-dhe Projects Valuation. Valuation will be provided. \`, /i 2 . The-parcel_ size is listed om.Page i of the application as "approximately 1.56 ,acres: ":Unclear as to what," approxmiately�" means. Additionally, under the pnor applications for this site. tie parcel size was listed as 1.63 acres. The square footage of the parcel previously submitted was 71.068 square feet (the FLD'application-states die parcel size is "approximately 67.950 square feet). Whj -.the discrepancv ?- The-site size on the prior application included an -� _ --additionaf`10 feet along Coronado Drive on die eastern end of the project site. -ti This 10 feet was subsequently dedicated to die City of Clearwater in order to widen Corona.do'driile. Revise Sheet }A -3.00 to show more of the Beach Walk project on the left hand (w-4t) side of the sheet, showing the entire concessions building (such is shoiru on Sheet A -3.00 submitted for the Minor Revision). Sheet 3.00 will be revised as requested. \ `Provide an up-to -date signed and sealed survey (including legal description of property) — One original and 14 copies. Up -to -date suhrvey will be provided. 5. Since this site and the area to the west is located within a Velocity Flood Zone. unclear how the concessions building will be constructed to meet FEMA requirements, including the building itself. electric. plumbing. etc. Advise. The sole purpose of this application is to eliminate the planned pedestrian bridge over Gulfview Boulevard and the associated planned landing in die middle of the sundial plaza. We do not wish to address the construction of the concessions building at this time. We acknowledge that the concessions building must comply with all applicable codes and regulations, or we must obtain waivers, variances. etc. from the controlling authorities. We will work with City of Clearwater staff. and with the appropriate regulator. agencies (with City support as provided in Article of 3.02.3 of the Development Agreement), to achieve the 6 7 8 9 10 11 i� 12 spirit and intent of section of the 5.04.7 of the Development Agreement to provide us with a concession facility in the sundial plaza. Sheet A -3.00 - The western edge of the Beach Promenade Sidewalk between the New Gulfidew Blvd. and the monumental stairs from the second /lobby floor needs to be completed (there is a gap in the edge connecting to the sidewalk crossing New Gulfiiew Blvd.). Sheet 3.00 will be revised as requested. Page 1 of the application requests the legal description of the property. The application states: "See Exhibit A attached hereto." There is no Exhibit A attached. Provide. Legal description «-ill be provided. According to Mark Matheny in the Development Services Department, the fountain pump cannot be below BFE. Revise. Fountain will be eliminated and replaced with a flower bed. , _J There is nothing being said as part of the application regarding the desire to have the tvwo driveways for the mobile kitchen acce's's:, Provide a written request and all background information (copies of sample mobile kitchens). Staff is still not supportive of this portion of the request, Tiie sole purpose of this application is to eliminate the planned pedestrian bridge -over Gulfview Boulevard and the associated planned landing in the middle of the sundial plaza. We do not wish to address the mobile kitchen slue at this dine. We acknowledge dint anythinng we do on level one adjacent to the beachvwalk�Promenade must comply= with all applicable codes and regulations. or �w e,must obtain waivers, variances. etc. from the controlling authorities. The,tvvo�drvways will be removed from the plans. �� \ Revise the parcel,nuinbers on Page 1 of the application to: 07/29/15/52380/ 000 %0570;07/29/15/52380)000 /0580; and 07/29/15 /52380 /000 /,1050. Application will be.revised as requested. If it is your desire to have an,activ _ground-le�-e1 on the west side of the building,adjacent to the.,Beach Promenade with retail. restaurant and /or /nightclub uses, this area'must meet FEMA regulations. In addition, public toilet facilities are required for this area. in accordance with Section 403.6 of the,Buildin'g Code - Plumbiag�.-This vwould include public toilet facilities available for `the - handicapped 1,The sole purpose of this application is to elinuna ie ttheplaiml d pedestrian bridge over Gulfi -ievw Boulevard and the -associated planned landing in the middle of the sundial plaza. It is our desire to lna ve an acts e-ground level on the west side of the building adjacent to the BeachWalk`Pronneuade, as we believe is the goal and intention of Beach by Desigu.and would "be encouraged by conventional wisdom among public planners. We�acknovwledge that anything we do on level one adjacent to the Beachwalk Promenade must comply with all applicable codes and regulations, or Ave must obtain waivers, variances, etc. from the appropriate authorities. We vwill work vwith City of Cleanwater staff. and with the appropriate regu laton, `agencies (with City support as provided in Article of 3.02.3 of the Development Agreement), to achieve the goal of an active ground level adjacent to the Beach Promenade. If there is no actual design of the proposed concessions facility available now, in order to provide four -sided building elevations. then there needs to be provided some design details for this proposed concessions facility (exterior materials, exterior colors, roof type, etc). There is no actual design for the Beach Service Facility at this time. The sole purpose of this application is to eliminate the planned pedestrian bridge over Gulfriew Boulevard and the associated planned landing in the middle of the sundial plaza. As mentioned above, the design of the concession building will require approval from several agencies. We will work with City of Cleanwater staff, and with the appropriate regulatory agencies (with City support as provided in Article of 3.02.3 of the Development Agreement), to achieve the goal of a facility that • • can operate as planned, meet the construction requirements of the regulator, agencies and be consistent with Beachwalk from the perspective of exterior materials, colors, roof tape, etc. There also needs to be some written material submitted as to what functions will occur within this concessions facility (what will be sold, what services provided. hours of operation, etc). Potentially some information from the adopted /recorded Development Agreement would be helpful. The sole purpose of this application is to eliminate the planned pedestrian bridge over, Gulf dew Boulevard and the associated planned landing in the middle of the sundial plaza. We are not requesting any changes to the proposed operation in the concession building. As provided in the Development Agreement. specifically, Exhibit 1 to Exhibit K the concession'buildung will provide 1. Rental of Beach Towels 2. Sale of prepackaged snacks and non - alcoholic beverages 3. Sale of Beach Sundries 4. Rental of showers and lockers 13. The approved plan provided a pedestrian`overpass over S. Gulfi-iew Blvd. that allowed people parking in the 44public, paarkung spaces witl»n the garage safe passage over the roadway between the parking garage and.the- beach. Proposal is to have pedestrians crossiug`S. Gulfi,ien..Blvd. at ground level,bui does not provide any, information or details as to the alternative crosswalk will look like or ho„ it operates to give an.equal "safe passage" between the parking garage and the beach. Details of�he proposed crosswalk will be added to the plan. The proposed design of tlie,cross„alk includes paving to match all other pedestrian crosswalks per Beach bi'Design. call buttons in monument signs consistent wi&Beacli Walk containinig�`walk/don-t walk" lights, rumble strips in the pavement. stops -bail -in the pavement and electronic lighting embedded in the pavement at/thd,nor&and-so'Ijth edges of the crosswalk. 14. Revise Sheets A -1.01 and A=-1.00 to show, the sundial plaza. Plans right now �conild-be lead that the circle closest to the crosswalk is a landscaped area, not somethiing people can walk-on. ` Sheets A -1.01 and 3.00 will be revised as submitted. ? - �> 15 .�Subnnit Sheet- A1.01. SheetA -1.01 will be submitted. 16. Potential condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: - ` \,That approval of this Flexible Development case is subject to the approval of a Developmeint,Agreement with the Cite (Case DVA2007- 00001): 177Need to subnnit-as'part of the application written material as to what the request is and why the request has been submitted (like nti °hy, the pedestrian overpass is proposed to be eliminated), including what is proposed to replace the pedestrian overpass. Any details as to the proposed replacement access needs to be submitted to describe the alternative proposed. Cover letter to will 19 20 "Provide written responses to the six General Applicability criteria contained on Page 2 of the application. Responses need to explain HOW each criteria is achieved, in detail. Responses need to be specific to what changes are being requested. Responses will be added . Provide written responses to the six Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria contained on Page 3 of the application. Responses need to explain HOW each criteria is achieved, in detail. Responses need to be specific to what changes are being requested. Responses will be added. Show on the plan the location of the Coastal Construction Control Line (CCCL) and the distance the proposed concessions building is from the CCCL. Mav need a setback reduction. Anv construction allowed seaward of the CCCL will require approval of the State prior to the issuance of any building permit. CCCL Tune will be added. Acknowledge need for approval by all applicable agencies. Other: No Comments Notes: Scheduled for the February 20, 2007, CDB meeting. Page 1 of 1 Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Wednesday, January 31, 2007 8:24 AM To: 'Chris Bastas' .Subject: RE: FLD2007- 01001, 229 and 301 South Gulfview Boulevard and 230, 300 and 304 Coronado Drive (Hyatt, aka Aqualea) It took some work, but they are attached. - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Chris Bastas [ mailto :chris @njrdevelopment.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 31, 2007 6:34 AM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: FLD2007- 01001, 229 and 301 South Gulfview Boulevard and 230, 300 and 304 Coronado Drive (Hyatt, aka Aqualea) Wayne, Would you or someone else in the Planning Department be able to email me the DRC comments in Word format rather than as a PDF file so that I can respond to each point raised as part of our resubmittal? Case number: FLD2007 -01001 - 301 South Gulfview Case number DVA2007 -00001 - 301 South Gulfview Thank you Christopher D. Bastas Director of Development NJR Development Company, LLC 101 E. Kennedy Boulevard Suite 2125 Tampa, Florida 33602 813 - 226 -9897 (tel) 813 - 226 -8747 (fax) Chris _ nirdevelopment.com www.aqualearesort.com 1/31/2007 Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Thursday, January 25, 2007 6:14 PM To: 'sszabo @foley.com' Cc: Albee, Rick; Buysse, Beverly A.; Buzzell, William; Doherty, Steve; Dougall- Sides, Leslie; Everitt, Steven; Glenn, Tom; Gluski, Roberta; Kader, Art; Keller, James; Kurleman, Scott; Morris, William D.; Reid, Debbie; Rice, Scott; Rickard, Leonard; Schodtler, John; Tefft, Robert; Thompson, Neil; Watkins, Sherry Subject: FLD2007- 01001, 229 and 301 South Gulfview Boulevard and 230, 300 and 304 Coronado Drive (Hyatt, aka Aqualea) Stephen - The DRC has reviewed the submitted Flexible Development application. Attached are the DRC comments that need. to be addressed in an amended application and /or documents /plans for this case. While this case has been scheduled for the February. 1, 2007, DRC meeting, it is not our intentions to meet with you on that day, since this is being fast - tracked to CDB (meaning, I can't wait that long). Should you have any questions regarding any of the comments, please contact me so that I can direct you to the appropriate person in the department you have concerns with the comments made. Please submit one original application and document, along with 14 copies, amended to reflect the attached comments by noon, Friday, February 2, 2007. This case has been scheduled for the February 20,'2007, Community Development Board (CDB) meeting at 1:00 pm in Council Chambers, 3rd Floor, City Hall, 112 S. Osceola Avenue, Clearwater, FL. Wayne 727 - 562 -4504 ea it draft 2.1.07 dre action agenda... y Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Tuesday, February 20, 2007 10:12 AM To: 'nicholas fritsch' Cc: Delk, Michael; Clayton, Gina; Thompson, Neil; Quillen, Michael; Akin, Pam Subject: RE: 229 301 Gulfview Nick - Page 1 of 1 The focus of this amendment is the elimination of the pedestrian overpass and its replacement with a crosswalk, and the replacement of the concession facility from the pedestrian overpass landing to a freestanding building. The following responses have been provided with the assistance of Mike Quillen, City Engineer, and Pam Akin, City Attorney. FLD 1. There are six 10' crosswalks and three 14' crosswalks. The one at the Hyatt is signalized. 2. Aesthetics- It was to be on the second floor and with the flood zone requirements it would have been over 30' in the air. Costs- City would have been responsible for reimbursing construction costs. Permitting- Potential ADA requirements for an elevator on the beach side would have made permitting difficult. If permittable, maintenance of an elevator in the sand conditions would have been difficult. 3. South Beach & Sand Key traffic should be using Coronado. S. Gulfview by design is supposed to be slow traffic. DVA 1. (Mike Quillen) I'm not sure what all change order costs you mean. I don't think we had any additional regulatory issues because of changes to the DVA. (Pam Akin) None.of these provisions are changed by the amendment. 2. This is not required by the agreement. 3. The City will participate on beach umbrellas and chairs etc., since it will go to an outside concession. This was a result of the negotiations. Wayne. - - - -- Original Message---- - From: nicholas fritsch [ mailto :nfritsch @tampabay.rr.com] Sent: Monday, February 19, 2007 9:46 AM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: 229 301 Gulfview FLD How many ped crosswalks are being built along Gulfview N of Hamden? What is the benefit to the city to eliminate the ped bridge? How do we explain this additional ped volume and less efficient flow of vehicle traffic to the city residents on South Beach and Sand Key? DVA It appears that the developer is paying for all of the change order constr. costs? True? Should the developer reimburse the city for staff hours to work thru the regulatory agencies? Why isn't the city benefiting from the sharing in concession the revenues in the identical manner to Pier 60? Thanks Nick 2/20/2007 Page 1 of 2 Wells, Wayne From: Akin, Pam Sent: Tuesday, February 20, 2007 9:56 AM To: Wells, Wayne; Quillen, Michael Cc: Delk, Michael; Clayton, Gina; Thompson, Neil Subject: RE: 229 301 Gulfview Wayne, several of these questions do not appear to relate to the amendment before the Board Pamela Akin, City Attorney 112 S. Osceola Ave Clearwater, Florida 33758 727 562 -4010 - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Tuesday,. February 20, 2007 9:05 AM To: Quillen, Michael; Akin, Pam Cc: Delk, Michael; Clayton, Gina; Thompson, Neil Subject: FW: 229 301 Gulfview Mike and Pam - These questions are from Nick Fritsch, CDB member, needing answers for the CDB meeting at 1:00 pm . today. Mike - Could you please provide responses to at least the FLD questions? Pam - Could you please provide responses to at least the DVA questions? If either of you have information regarding the other set of questions (Mike - DVA; Pam - FLD), feel free to comment. PLEASE PROVIDE THE RESPONSES TO ME ASAP (NO LATER THAN NOON) AND I WILL REPLY TO MR. FRITSCH (it may be by email and verbally at the meeting). Thanks for your help. Wayne - - - -- Original Message---- - From: nicholas fritsch [mailto:nfritsch @tampabay.rr.com] Sent: Monday, February 19, 2007 9:46 AM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: 229 301 Gulfview FLD How many ped crosswalks are being built along Gulfview N of Hamden? What is the benefit to the city to eliminate the ped bridge? How do we explain this additional ped volume and less efficient flow of vehicle traffic to the city residents on South Beach and Sand Key? DVA[Akin, Pam] None of these provisions are changed by the amendment It appears that the developer is paying for all of the change order constr. costs? True? Should the developer reimburse the city for staff hours to work thru the regulatory agencies ?[Akin, Pam] This is not required by the agreement Why isn't the city benefiting from the sharing in concession the revenues in the identical manner to Pier 60 ?[Akin, Pam] The City will participate on beach umbrellas and chairs etc since it will go to an outside 2/20/2007 Page 2 of 2 concession. This was a result of the negotiations. Thanks Nick 2/20/2007 Page 1 of 2 • Wells, Wayne From: Quillen, Michael Sent: Tuesday, February 20, 2007 9:47 AM To: Wells, Wayne; Akin, Pam Cc: Delk, Michael; Clayton, Gina; Thompson, Neil. Subject: RE: 229 301-Gulfview FLD: 1. There are six 10' crosswalks and three 14' crosswalks. The one at the Hyatt is signalized. 2. Aesthetics- it was to be on the second floor and with the flood zone requirements it would have been over 30' in the air. Costs- City would have been responsible for reimbursing construction costs. Permitting- Potential ADA requirements for an elevator on the beach side would have made permitting difficult. If permittable, maintenance of an elevator in the sand conditions would have been difficult. 3. South Beach & Sand Key traffic should be using Coronado. S. Gulfview by design is supposed to be slow traffic. DVA: I'm not sure what all change order costs he means. I don't think we had any additional regulatory issues because of changes to the DVA. Michael D. Quillen, P.E. Director of Engineering City of Clearwater michael.quillen@myclearwater.com 727 - 562 -4743 - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Tuesday, February 20, 2007 9:05 AM To: Quillen, Michael; Akin, Pam Cc: Delk, Michael; Clayton, Gina; Thompson, Neil Subject: FW: 229 301 Gulfview Mike and Pam - These questions are from Nick Fritsch, CDB member, needing answers for the CDB meeting at 1:00 pm today. Mike - Could you please provide responses to at least the FLD questions? Pam - Could you please provide responses to at least the DVA questions? If either of you have information regarding the other set of questions (Mike - DVA; Pam - FLD), feel free to comment. PLEASE PROVIDE THE RESPONSES TO ME ASAP (NO LATER THAN NOON) AND I WILL REPLY TO MR. FRITSCH (it may be by email and verbally at the meeting). Thanks for your help. Wayne - - - -- Original Message---- - From: nicholas fritsch [mailto:nfritsch @tampabay.rr.com] Sent: Monday, February 19, 2007 9:46 AM 2/20/2007 , • � Page 2 of 2 r To: Wells, Wayne Subject: 229 301 Gulfview FLD How many ped crosswalks are being built along Gulfview N of Hamden? What is the benefit to the city to eliminate the ped bridge? How do we explain this additional ped volume and less efficient flow of vehicle traffic to the city residents on South Beach and Sand Key? DVA It appears that the developer is paying for all of the change order constr. costs? True? Should the developer reimburse the city for staff hours to work thru the regulatory agencies? Why isn't the city benefiting from the sharing in concession the revenues in the identical manner to Pier 60? Thanks Nick 2/20/2007 CRIGINAL CDB Meeting Date: February 20, 2007 Case Number: FLD2007 -01001 (Related to DVA2007- 00001) Agenda Item: E4 (Related to 172) Owners /Applicant: Crystal Beach Capital, LLC Representative`. Stephen J. Szabo, III Addresses: 229 and 301 South Gulfview Boulevard and 230, 300 and 304 Coronado Drive CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT GENERAL INFORMATION: REQUEST: Flexible Development approval to permit the elimination of a pedestrian overpass over South Gulfview Boulevard and to permit a standalone concession facility in lieu of the bridge landing area for such concessions for the Hyatt/Aqualea project, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2- 803.C. CURRENT ZONING: Tourist (T) District CURRENT FUTURE LAND Community Redevelopment District (CRD) USE CATEGORY: PROPERTY USE: Current Use: Vacant (under construction) Proposed Use: Hotel of 250 rooms (153.37 rooms /acre on total site), 18 attached dwellings (11.04 units /acre on total site) and a maximum of 70,000 square feet (0.98 FAR on total site) of amenities accessory to the hotel, at a height of 150 feet (to roof deck) EXISTING SURROUNDING ZONING AND USES: North: Tourist (T) District South: Tourist (T) District East: Tourist (T) District West: Open Space/Recreation (OS/R) District Vacant, Overnight Accommodations and Retail Sales/Restaurants Retail Sales and Restaurant Overnight Accommodations and Restaurant Beach ANALYSIS: Site Location and Existing Conditions: The 1.56 acres is located between South Gulfview Boulevard and Coronado Drive at Third Street. The original site was 1.63 acres, but the dedication of 10 feet for Coronado Drive reduced the site size to 1.56 acres. The Community Development Board (CDB) originally approved this project on February 20, 2001, under Cases FL 01 -01 -01 and DA 01- 01 -01, permitting a 250 -room hotel. On November 16, 2004, the CDB approved Case FLD2004- 07052, adding 24 rooms to the hotel and converting those additional rooms to 18 attached dwellings. The subject property is currently vacant but is under construction with the proposed building. Property to the north is approved for the Kiran Grand mixed use project. Improvements on portions of that Community Development Board — February 20, 2007 FLD2007 -01001 — Page 1 of 7 0 .1 0 property to the north have been demolished and are currently vacant, whereas other improvements still remain. The owners of the Kiran Grand have dedicated the right -of -way for Second Street, which will be on the north side of this property. Properties to the east are developed with overnight accommodation uses and a restaurant. The parcel to the south is developed with restaurant and retail sales uses. Beach Walk improvements to Coronado Drive are currently being completed, while construction of Phase 2 improvements to South Gulfview Boulevard are slated to begin construction soon. On January 25, 2007, a Development Order was issued for a Minor Revision to the previously approved project for the following: • With the availability of the Second Street right -of -way (deeded to the City), traffic circulations patterns on the ground floor have been revised to provide egress from the building to Second Street; • Loading and trash collection access has been relocated to Second Street; • The internal helix has been replaced with a speed ramp to gain access from the ground floor to Parking Level 3; • The parking garage cashier booths have been relocated to Parking Level 3; • Driveways on the west side on South Gulfview Boulevard have been removed; . • Monumental stairs have been provided on the west side allowing access from the ground floor to the Hotel Level 2; • The east, north and south elevations of the building have been modified replacing the "solid" walls of the parking levels with decorative railings, arches and columns to more closely match that of the habitable floors of the hotel; • Vertical elements of the hotel towers on the north and south elevations have been modified to improve views and to coordinate with the parking levels; and • The roof profile has been modified to reduce the size of the mansard roof portions. Development Proposal: The development proposal is to eliminate the pedestrian overpass over South Gulfview Boulevard and to permit a standalone concession facility in lieu of the bridge landing area for such concessions for the Hyatt/Aqualea project. The elimination of the pedestrian overpass will present a more aesthetically pleasing view by not having such a large structure above the roadway, which could block views. The elimination will also remove a structure that may have questionable use, as potentially most people going to or from the beach would use elevators that go to the ground level of the hotel /parking garage and walk across South Gulfview Boulevard. The safety of motorists would be increased by the elimination of the pedestrian overpass, by eliminating the opportunity to distract motorists by pedestrians on the bridge or by pedestrians dropping items from the bridge. The viability of the construction of the pedestrian overpass is also questionable, due the need for an elevator, which would occur seaward of the Coastal Construction Control Line (CCCL). Long -term maintenance of such a bridge structure, especially the elevator, would be high. The proposal does not change the floor area ratio, the impervious surface ratio, the density of the project, the minimum lot area or width, the building height, the minimum off - street parking, the location of mechanical equipment (on the roof), sight visibility triangles or utilities for this project. From a site plan standpoint, there is no change to the site plan for on -site improvements. The pedestrian bridge was to occur within the City's right -of -way or property.. The proposal replaces the pedestrian overpass with a crosswalk across from the building elevators providing access to the parking garage. The design of the crosswalk will be similar to other proposed crosswalks on South Gulfview Boulevard. A "sundial" plaza will be constructed in line with this proposed crosswalk. Community Development Board — February 20, 2007 FLD2007 -01001 — Page 2 of 7 The proposed concessions facility is designed as a freestanding, one -story octagonal building. It is proposed seaward of the CCCL, which will require State Department of Environmental Protection approval prior to the issuance of any permits. The location of this concession facility is also within a velocity flood zone, where its construction must allow for flow - through wave action with breakaway walls. Its construction must be in compliance with FEMA regulations. While no building elevations have been submitted, the concessions facility will be no more than 1,200 square feet in size and will need to be consistent in design, materials and colors with the primary building and with Beach Walk design guidelines. Since Phase 1 construction of Beach Walk improvements is nearing completion, there has been a stormwater inlet installed at the southwest corner of Coronado Drive and the new Second Street, adjacent to the solid waste compactor area. There may be a conflict between the plans submitted and the existing conditions. Any modification to this stormwater inlet will be the responsibility of the hotel developer. Code Enforcement Analysis: There are no outstanding Code Enforcement issues, associated with the subject property. Community Development Board — February 20, 2007 FLD2007 -01001 — Page 3 of 7 0 • COMPLIANCE WITH STANDARDS AND CRITERIA: The following table depicts the consistency of the development proposal with the standards and criteria as per Tables 2 -801.1 and 2 -803 of the Community Development Code: 1 Previously approved under FL 01 -01 -01 in 2001. 2 The 250 rooms included 183 hotel rooms from the Beach by Design density pool and 67 existing hotel rooms. In 2004, an additional 24 rooms was approved from the density pool. The applicant converted 24 of the existing hotel rooms to 18 attached dwellings (condominium) 3 The original site had 1.63 acres. The site after right -of -way dedication for Coronado Drive is 1.56 acres. 4 When originally approved, the setback from the north property line was a side setback. Now, with the dedication of Second Street right -of -way by the adjacent property owner, the setback changes to a front setback (at a zero setback — the same as originally approved and the same as the east and west front setback) Community Development Board - February 20, 2007 FLD2007 -01001 —Page 4 of 7 Standard Proposed Consistent Inconsistent F.A.R. 1.0 0.98 FAR (70,000 square X' feet of amenities accessory to the hotel) I.S.R. 0.95 1.0 X1 Density 40 overnight accommodation units per Hotel of 250 rooms (153.37 X acre; 30 dwelling units per acre rooms /acre on total site), 18 attached dwellings (11.04 units /acre on total site) Lot Area 10,000 - 20,000 sf min. for overnight 71,068 square feet (1.63 X accom.; 5,000 —10,000 sf for attached acres)3 dwellings Lot Width 100 - 150 ft min. for overnight accom.; East: 305 feet X West: 278 feet X 50 — 100 ft min for attached dwellings Setbacks Front: 0 - 15 feet East:. zero feet X' West: zero feet X1 Side: 0 - 10 feet North: zero feet' X' South: zero feet X' Height 35 — 100 feet 150 feet (to roof deck) with X' add. nine feet for perimeter parapets (from highest roof deck) & add. 27 feet for elevator, stair, mechanical rooms /architectural embellishments (from highest roof deck) Off - Street one space per room for overnight 753 parking spaces X Parking accom.; 1.5 spaces per unit for attached dwellings (277 spaces + 400 public spaces = 677 spaces) 1 Previously approved under FL 01 -01 -01 in 2001. 2 The 250 rooms included 183 hotel rooms from the Beach by Design density pool and 67 existing hotel rooms. In 2004, an additional 24 rooms was approved from the density pool. The applicant converted 24 of the existing hotel rooms to 18 attached dwellings (condominium) 3 The original site had 1.63 acres. The site after right -of -way dedication for Coronado Drive is 1.56 acres. 4 When originally approved, the setback from the north property line was a side setback. Now, with the dedication of Second Street right -of -way by the adjacent property owner, the setback changes to a front setback (at a zero setback — the same as originally approved and the same as the east and west front setback) Community Development Board - February 20, 2007 FLD2007 -01001 —Page 4 of 7 0 0 COMPLIANCE WITH FLEXIBILITY CRITERIA: The following table depicts the consistency of the development proposal with the Flexibility criteria as per Section 2 -803.0 of the Community Development Code (Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project): . Community Development Board — February 20, 2007 FLD2007 -01001 — Page 5 of 7 Consistent Inconsistent 1. The development or redevelopment is otherwise impractical without deviations from X the use and/or development standards set forth in this zoning district. 2. The development or redevelopment will be consistent with the goals and policies of X the Comprehensive Plan, as well as with the general purpose, intent and basic planning objectives of this Code, and with the intent and purpose of this zoning district. 3. The development or redevelopment will not impede the normal and orderly X development and improvement of surrounding properties. . 4. Adjoining properties will not suffer substantial detriment as a result of the proposed X development 5. The proposed use shall otherwise be permitted by the underlying future land use X category, be compatible with adjacent land uses, will not substantially alter the essential use characteristics of the neighborhood; and shall demonstrate compliance with one or more of the following objectives: a. The proposed use is permitted in this zoning district as a minimum standard, flexible standard or flexible development use; b. The proposed use would be a significant economic contributor to the City's economic base by diversifying the local economy or by creating jobs; c. The development proposal accommodates the expansion or redevelopment of an existing economic contributor; d. The proposed use provides for the provision of affordable housing; e. The proposed use provides for development or redevelopment in an area that is characterized by other similar development and where a land use plan amendment and rezoning would result in a spot land use or zoning designation; or f. The proposed use provides for the development of a new and/or preservation of a working waterfront use. 6. Flexibility with regard to use, lot width, required setbacks, height and off - street X parking are justified based on demonstrated compliance with all of the following design objectives: a. The proposed development will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of the surrounding properties for uses permitted in this zoning district; b. The proposed development complies with applicable design guidelines adopted by the City; c. The design, scale and intensity of the proposed development supports the established or emerging character of an area; d. In order to form a cohesive, visually interesting and attractive appearance, the proposed development incorporates a substantial number of the following design elements: ❑ Changes in horizontal building planes; ❑ Use of architectural details such as columns, cornices, stringcourses, pilasters, porticos, balconies, railings, awnings, etc.; ❑ Variety in materials, colors and textures; ❑ Distinctive fenestration patterns; • Building stepbacks; and • Distinctive roofs forms. e. The proposed development provides for appropriate buffers, enhanced landscape design and appropriate distances between buildings. Community Development Board — February 20, 2007 FLD2007 -01001 — Page 5 of 7 COMPLIANCE WITH GENERAL STANDARDS FOR LEVEL TWO APPROVALS: The following table depicts the consistency of the development proposal with the General Standards for Level Two Approvals as per Section 3 -913 of the Community Development Code: SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION: The Development Review Committee (DRC) reviewed the application and supporting materials at its meeting of February 1, 2007, and deemed the development proposal to be sufficient to move forward to the Community Development Board (CDB), based upon the following findings of fact and conclusions of law: Findings of Fact: 1. That 1.56 acres is located between South Gulfview Boulevard and Coronado Drive at Third Street; 2. That the property is located within the Tourist (T) District and the Community Redevelopment District (CRD) Future Land Use Plan category; 3. That the Community Development Board (CDB) originally approved this project on February 20, 2001, under Cases FL O1 -01 -01 and DA 01- 01 -01, permitting a 250 -room hotel; 4. That on November 16, 2004, the CDB approved Case FLD2004- 07052, adding 24 rooms to the hotel and converting those additional rooms to 18 attached dwellings; 5. That the project is currently under construction; 6. That the approved project included a pedestrian overpass to provide access between the public parking in the hotel parking garage and the beach; 7. That the proposal is for the elimination of the pedestrian overpass on South Gulfview Boulevard; 8. That elimination of the pedestrian overpass would present a more aesthetically pleasing view, would not block views, would present a safer interface between motorists and pedestrians, would reduce long -term maintenance of the pedestrian walkway; 9. That the proposal provides for an alternative concession facility as a freestanding building rather than as part of the beach landing portion of the pedestrian overpass; and 10. That there are no outstanding Code Enforcement issues associated with the subject property. Conclusions of Law: 1. That the development proposal is consistent with the Standards as per Tables 2 7801.1 and 2 -803 of the Community Development Code; 2. That the development proposal is consistent with the Flexibility criteria as per Section 2 -803.0 of the Community Development Code; and 3. That the development proposal is consistent with the General Standards for Level Two Approvals as per Section 3 -913 of the Community Development Code. Community Development Board — February 20, 2007 FLD2007 -01001 — Page 6 of 7 Consistent Inconsistent 1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, X coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage development and use of X adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons X residing or working in the neighborhood. 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. X 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the X immediate vicinity. 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including X visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts on adjacent properties. SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION: The Development Review Committee (DRC) reviewed the application and supporting materials at its meeting of February 1, 2007, and deemed the development proposal to be sufficient to move forward to the Community Development Board (CDB), based upon the following findings of fact and conclusions of law: Findings of Fact: 1. That 1.56 acres is located between South Gulfview Boulevard and Coronado Drive at Third Street; 2. That the property is located within the Tourist (T) District and the Community Redevelopment District (CRD) Future Land Use Plan category; 3. That the Community Development Board (CDB) originally approved this project on February 20, 2001, under Cases FL O1 -01 -01 and DA 01- 01 -01, permitting a 250 -room hotel; 4. That on November 16, 2004, the CDB approved Case FLD2004- 07052, adding 24 rooms to the hotel and converting those additional rooms to 18 attached dwellings; 5. That the project is currently under construction; 6. That the approved project included a pedestrian overpass to provide access between the public parking in the hotel parking garage and the beach; 7. That the proposal is for the elimination of the pedestrian overpass on South Gulfview Boulevard; 8. That elimination of the pedestrian overpass would present a more aesthetically pleasing view, would not block views, would present a safer interface between motorists and pedestrians, would reduce long -term maintenance of the pedestrian walkway; 9. That the proposal provides for an alternative concession facility as a freestanding building rather than as part of the beach landing portion of the pedestrian overpass; and 10. That there are no outstanding Code Enforcement issues associated with the subject property. Conclusions of Law: 1. That the development proposal is consistent with the Standards as per Tables 2 7801.1 and 2 -803 of the Community Development Code; 2. That the development proposal is consistent with the Flexibility criteria as per Section 2 -803.0 of the Community Development Code; and 3. That the development proposal is consistent with the General Standards for Level Two Approvals as per Section 3 -913 of the Community Development Code. Community Development Board — February 20, 2007 FLD2007 -01001 — Page 6 of 7 0 0 Based upon the above, the Planning Department recommends APPROVAL of the Flexible Development application to permit the elimination of a pedestrian overpass over South Gulfview. Boulevard and to permit a standalone concession facility in lieu of the bridge landing area for such concessions for the Hyatt/Aqualea project, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2- 803.C, with the following conditions: Conditions of Approval: 1. That approval of this Flexible Development case is subject to the approval of a Development Agreement with the City (Case DVA2007- 00001); 2. That the final design of hotel building be consistent with conceptual elevations submitted and/or modified by the Community Development Board; 3. That the concession facility not exceed 1;200 square feet in area, be one -story in height and its design, materials and color be consistent with the hotel building and with Beach by Design guidelines and be designed to meet FEMA requirements within a Velocity Flood Zone; 4. That, prior to the issuance of the building permit for the concession facility, the State Department of Environmental Protection approve its location seaward of the Coastal Construction Control Line; 5. That any modification to the stormwater inlet at the southwest corner of Coronado Drive and the new Second Street be the responsibility of the hotel developer; Prepared by Planning Department Staff: (/ - 1 • kl" Wayne M. ells, AICP, Planner III ATTACHMENTS: ❑ Location Map ❑ Aerial Map ❑ Zoning Map ❑ Existing Surrounding Uses Map ❑ Photographs of Site and Vicinity S: (Planning Department) C D BIFLEX (FLD)IPending caseslUp for the next CDBI Gulfview S 0301 Hyatt.Aqualea (7) - 1.10.07 CDB - WWIGulfview S 301 Staff Report.doc Community Development Board — February 20, 2007 FLD2007 -01001 — Page 7 of 7 Resume Wayne M. Wells, AICP 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, FL 33756 727 -562 -4504 wayne.wells(i,myclearwater.com PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE • Planner III Planning Department, City of Clearwater, FL November 2001 to Present As part of the Development Review Division, prepared and presented staff reports for Flexible Standard Development (staff -level cases), Flexible Development (public hearing cases) and Plats before the Development Review Committee and the Community Development Board and Development Agreements before the City Council; Reviewed building permits for Code conformance; Prepared and/or assisted preparation of Code amendments; Provided public information (via telephone, mail, email, zoning counter or predevelopment meetings). • Zoning Coordinator Zoning Division, City of Pinellas Park, FL March 1989 to November 2001 Acting Zoning Director; Represented the Zoning Division on cases and issues before the City Council, Community Redevelopment Agency, Planning and Zoning Commission, Board of Adjustment and outside agencies; Prepared and presented staff reports for land use plan amendments, rezoned, planned unit developments, conditional uses, variances and site plans; Reviewed final site plans and building permits for Code conformance; Prepared and/or assisted preparation of Code amendments; Provided public information (via telephone, mail, zoning counter or predevelopment meetings). • Program Manager, Zoning. Branch Manatee County Department of Planning and Development June 1984 to March 1989 Bradenton, FL Trained and supervised three employees; Prepared and presented variances and appeals to the Board of Zoning Appeals; Coordinated final site plan and building permit review for Code conformance; Assisted in preparation of Code amendments; Provided public information (via telephone, mail, zoning counter or predevelopment meetings). Interim Code Enforcement Manager- Managed the Code Enforcement Section; Supervised six employees; Prosecuted cases before the Code Enforcement Board; Investigated and prepared cases of alleged violations of land use and building codes. Planner II, Current Planning Section — Prepared and presented staff reports for rezones, planned developments, special permits, plats and mobile home parks to Planning Commission and Board of County Commissioners; Reviewed final site plans and building permits for Code enforcement; Assisted in preparation of Code amendments; Provided public information (via telephone, mail, zoning counter or predevelopment meetings). • • • Planner I Alachua County Department of Planning and Development June 1980 to June 1984 Gainesville, FL Prepared and presented staff reports for rezones and special permits to Planning Commission and Board of County Commissioners; Reviewed site plans and plats for Code conformance; Assisted in preparation of Code amendments; Provided public information (via telephone, mail, zoning counter or predevelopment meetings). Intern — Compiled and coordinated the Alachua County Information and Data Book; Drafted ordinance revisions; General research. • Graduate Assistant University of Florida Department of Urban and Regional Planning 1979 to 1981 Gainesville, FL Coordinated downtown study for Mayo, FL; Coordinated graphics for Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan. • Planning Technician Planning Division, City of St. Petersburg, FL 1977 to 1979 Prepared primarily graphics, for both publication and presentation; Division photographer for 1 years; Worked on historic survey and report. EDUCATION Master of Arts in Urban and Regional Planning (Degree not conferred; course work completed, thesis not completed), University of Florida, 1981 Bachelor of Design in Architecture, University of Florida, 1976 LICENSES & CERTIFICATES American Institute of Certified Planners American Planning Association, Suncoast Section 0 y, b -- KENDALL � 02 C NE NO v BAY ESPLANADE pp4M �N S0 fROCKAWAY �br 2 a 'h BAYMONT ST I SAfI M C W SKIFF pa's � A GhoH�N PAPAYA ST 5 ~ DORY PPSSArE S 3' ��L o Ce�eewe Blvd ."rte WINDWARD p SAO PROJECT SR 10 SITE F° S7 .;g S7 OR �ql '+ 3 0 iu U m BRIGHT WATER DR FIFTH ST Ow BAVSIDE GR fid SAY S � BLVD VFW SD BLVD s� ki x Location Map FLD2007 -01001 Owner: Crystal Beach Capital, LLC case: DVA2007 -00001 229 and 301 South Gulfview Boulevard Property 1.63 site: 230, 300 and 304 Coronado Drive Size (Acres): 07/29/15/52380/000 /0570 PIN: 07/29/15/52380/000 /0580 07/29/15/52380/000 /1050 I Atlas Page: 276A • 9 mFWmW y • s � s t 'J • J - .. a I A r — — sl a t ai 0 A l A t ii� Yom_ A _� + S • '► �'r`�� =,mss i," �+ 3► re • ,`� :�' -,. r �' a .,,,fi *t F P Aerial Map Owner: Crystal Beach Capitc I, LLC Case: FLD2007 -01001 DVA2007 -00001 Site: 229 and 301 South Guifvievy Boulevard Property 1.63 230, 300 and 304 Coroncdo Drive SizejAcres): 07/29/15152380/000 /0570 PIN: 07/29 /15152380/000/0580 07/29/15152380/000 /1050 Atlas Page: 276A 0 0 100 I 1 FIRST ST los ) 90__ 1 1 l y � tt1 l y \ 9g 1 1 401 1 100 2 2 1 I I 1 O l... —_ -1~ I ! 213 i 219 i s__ L.S.Ngr" •, �1 i ) 219 if P I 2�+ i [ `\ / 2281 l---- \\ 1 % - 230 —mil �✓ t A? TMIRV ST 1301 3 251 3M1 305 —y I �_ —__ j I 9 1-, i 1 311 --- 312 3151 316 'l'6 -___ tJ- 316 319 i__ -j 1 lY rte/ > ) - t J? 3Z_''- 1. IJ / l 3F31 1 i ) 1 330 1 j 33 it ml (l 1 I Zoning Map FLD2007 -01001 Owner: Crystal Beach Capital, LLC Case: DVA2007 -00001 229 and 301 South Gulfview Boulevard Property Site: 1.63 230,300 and 304 Coronado Drive Size(Acres): 07/29/15/52380/000 /0570 PIN: 07/29/15/52380/000 /0580 07/29/15/52380/000 /1050 Atlas Page: 276A 0 0 A100 — S 105 I 88 90 FIRS7' -`_ 9L r_ -- W I 1 fV _1 911 j _rl I \ \ 1 Q 1 ht� - - -1 0 er 1001" r �cotnmodatio I t Oveiin hg"---j a13 - L.S ` =_ -1 ci 217 1 1 #g 218 - -1 - acco ddati s �' 279 i, , - -_= 216 - 1 , 2�1 City parking lot - -9 _ and beach - - -, _ -- THIRD sT ""_ -- 3 25S - 1 -.! j� 1 O ,30, 3004, ernig r r- a gemm lotions ek'thurantYRet it 1 ,- - -, 316 1 `�73 -_ -_ 1 I.J -1 315 , 316 1 r 1 319 c___1 1 1 0 117 1__. _�.�•.� 1 ' 1 JJ21 t 1 T 3776 3Y3� I T _ ! 1 1 J32 O , 25et, �zd �1 _ a comp4odption 15C ' dtldgtio s I 1 t 330 Q -1 ml r i 1r \ �A ti of ! jl Existing Surrounding Uses Map FLD2007 -01001 Owner. Crystal Beach Capital, LLC Case: DVA2007 -00001 229 and 301 South Gulfview Boulevard Property 1.63 Site: 230,300 and 304 Coronado Drive size(Acres): 07/29/15/52380/000 /0570 PIN: 07/29/15/52380/000 /0580 07/29/15/52380/000 /1050 Atlas Page: 276A View looking northwest at subject site from Coronado Drive at 3' Street View looking north along S. Gulfview Blvd. at property to the north of subject site Adik View looking southeast at subject site from S. Gulfview Blvd. at 3rd Street View looking southwest at subject site from Coronado Drive at 3rd Street 229 & 301 South Gulfview /230, 304 & 304 Coronado Drive FLD2007- 01011/DVA2007 -00001 Page 1 of 2 u View looking northeast at properties along Coronado Drive north of 3rd Street View looking southwest from Coronado Drive at View looking southeast at properties along Coronado Drive south of 31 Street View looking southeast from S. Gulfview Blvd. at properties to the south of subject site View looking west at City parking lot and beach west of S. Gulfview Blvd. and subject site 229 & 301 South Gulfview /230, 300 & 304 Coronado Drive FLD2007- 01011/1)VA2007 -00001 Page 2 of 2 Conditions Associated With Z`' FLD2007 -01001 t 301 S GULFVIEW BLVD Engineering Condition Steve Doherty 562 -4773 01/22/2007 Show on the plan the location of the Coastal Construction Control Line (C.C.C.L.) and the relative Not Met location of the proposed concessions building. NOTE: A Florida D.E.P. permit is required for any construction seaward of the C.C.C.L. 01/22/2007 Show sidewalk along Second Street (By Others). Not Met 01/22/2007 There is a storm inlet in Second Street at the access to the trash.compactor. Any modifications to Not Met the inlet needed to accommodate a solid waste truck is the responsibility of the developer. Fire Condition James Keller 562 -4327 x3062 01/24/2007 Show the U.L. listing of having a MOBILE KITCHEN INSIDE a building, Examples that were Not Met demonstrated were for outdoor use. Acknowledge PRIOR to CDB. 01/25/2007 Mobile Kitchen inside of the building, how will these units meet the requirements of Not Met NFPA 96 -2001 edition Standard for ventilation control and fire protection of commercial cooking operations ? Acknowledge PRIOR to CDB 01/25/2007 Mobile Kitchen on the South End has an EXIT from the inside of the building passing through it Not Met with fire seperation, how do you keep the fire seperation in this exit corridor, exits cannont pass through a kitchen ? Acknowledge PRIOR to CDB Storm Water Condition Bob Maran 562 -4592 01/22/2007 Prior to CDB, the site plan is to show a cross section at the walkway with existing and proposed Not Met elevations on NAVD 88 datum. The cross section is to reflect elevations of the roadway,curb and gutter as proposed on the plans for Beach Walk. Traffic Eng Condition Bennett Elbo 562 -4775 01/22/2007 1. Show on the plan the proposed pavement markings and signage for the crosswalk on Gulfview Not Met Boulevard. 2. Eliminate the two driveways along Gulfview Boulevard. Note: The northerly driveway does not meet 125' minimum distance between driveway and intersection per Community Development Code Sec. 3 -102 C.3.. 3. Show on the plan crosswalk markings with ADA standard ramps for sidewalks along Gulfview Blvd. and Coronado Dr., crossing Second Street per FDOT index 304. 4. Show on the plan pedestrian pathway from sidewalk on south side of Second St. to the employee's entrance. The portion of the pathway in the driveway shall be located as close to the curb -line as possible to afford greater visibility for vehicles exiting the building. 5. Show on the plan ramps and a pedestrian crosswalk in front of vehicular ingress /egress drives on Coronado Dr. The crosswalk and ramps shall be positioned as close to the curb -line as possible to afford greater visibility for vehicles exiting the building. 6. Show on the plan a "stop -bar" 4 -feet behind the cross walks on Coronado Dr. and Second St. exit drives with stop signs and "rumble strips" on the ramps preceding the stop signs. The above items shall be addressed prior to the issuance of a building permit. General Note(s): 1. DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. Zoning Condition Wayne Wells, AICP 727- 562 -4504 Print Date: 02/13/2007 Page 1 of 2 CaseConditons FLD2007 -01001 301 S GULFVIEW BLVD Zoning Condition Wayne Wells, AICP 727 - 562 -4504 01/19/2007 Since this site and the area to the west is located within a Velocity Flood Zone, unclear how the Not Met concessions building will be constructed to meet FEMA requirements, including the building itself, electric, plumbing, etc. Advise. 01/19/2007 According to Mark Matheny in the Development Services Department, the fountain pump cannot Not Met be below BFE. Revise. 01/23/2007 If it is your desire to have an active ground level on the west side of the building adjacent to the Not Met Beach Promenade with retail, restaurant and /or nightclub uses, this area must meet FEMA regulations. In addition, public toilet facilities are required for this area, in accordance with Section 403.6 of the Building Code - Plumbing. This would include public toilet facilities available for the handicapped. 01/23/2007 Potential condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: Not Met That approval of this Flexible Development case is subject to the approval of a Development Agreement with the City (Case DVA2007- 00001); 01/25/2007 Show on the plan the location of the Coastal Construction Control Line (CCCL) and the distance Not Met the proposed concessions building is from the CCCL. May need a setback reduction. Any construction allowed seaward of the CCCL will require approval of the State prior to the issuance of any building permit. CaseConditons Print Date: 02/13/2007 Page 2 of 2 • Wells, Wayne • From: Doherty, Steve Sent: Thursday, February 08, 2007 9:23 AM To: Wells, Wayne Cc: Rice, Scott Subject: FW: FLD2007- 01001/DVA2007 -00001 301 S. Gulfview Blvd. , am sending you this message again to amplify our concerns regarding the Stormwater and Engineering comments.. Please note we are asking that these two comments be addressed by the applicant prior to CDB. Thanks, Steve Engineering 1. There is a storm inlet in Second Street at the access, to the trash compactor. Any modification to the inlet needed to accommodate a solid waste truck is the responsibility of the developer. * Please acknowledge prior to CDB Storm Water 1. Prior to CDB, the site plan is to show a cross section at the walkway with existing and proposed elevations on NAVD 88 datum. The cross section is to reflect elevations of the roadway, curb and gutter as proposed on the plans for Beach Walk. *Staff is available to assist the developer in creating this cross - section. I have reviewed the resubmission for the above referenced item and the following concerns need to be addressed: Traffic Engineering: 1. Show on the plan the proposed pavement markings and signage for the crosswalk on Gulfview Boulevard. * Applicant has shown the cross walk but stop bar and rumble strips are not needed. Signage, pavement markings and lighting will be more completely addressed via the building permitting process. 2. Show on the plan crosswalk markings with AD standard ramps for sidewalks along Gulfview Blvd. and Coronado Dr., crossing Second Street per FDOT index 304. *The north /south crossings are acceptable as indicated on the revised plans; However the crosswalks shown crossing Coronado Drive shall be deleted. 3. Show on the plan pedestrian pathway from sidewalk on south side of Second St. to the employee's entrance. *Traffic Engineering's comment intended that the applicant provide pedestrian access from the sidewalk immediately west of the drive adjacent to the employee's entrance only - not to extend a general pedestrian path across the truck loading and compactor areas. 4. Depict a "stop -bar" 4 -feet behind the cross walks on Coronado Dr. and Second St. exit drives with stop signs and "rumble strips" on the ramps preceding the stop signs. * The stop signs and rumble strips need to be shown on the building plans. Crosswalk design shall be coordinated with Traffic Engineering. The above items shall be addressed prior to the issuance of a, building permit. Stephen L. Doherty Engineering Specialist I steve.doherty @myclearwater.com (727) 562 -4773 Wells, Wayne From: Doherty, Steve Sent: Wednesday, February 07, 2007 4:08 PM To: Wells, Wayne Cc: Rice, Scott; Elbo, Bennett; Maran, Robert (Bob) Subject: FLD2007- 01001/DVA2007 -00001 301 S. Gulfview Blvd. I have reviewed the resubmission for the above referenced item and the following concerns need to be addressed: Traffic Engineering: 1. Show on the plan the proposed pavement markings and signage for the crosswalk on Gulfview Boulevard. " Applicant has shown the cross walk but stop bar and rumble strips are not needed. Signage, pavement markings and lighting will be more completely addressed via the building permitting process. 2. Show on the plan crosswalk markings with ADA standard ramps for sidewalks along Gulfview Blvd. and Coronado Dr., crossing. Second Street per FDOT index 304. *The north /south crossings are acceptable as indicated on the revised plans; However the crosswalks shown crossing Coronado Drive shall be deleted. 3. Show on the plan pedestrian pathway from sidewalk on south side of Second St. to the employee's entrance. *Traffic Engineering's comment intended that the applicant provide pedestrian access from the sidewalk immediately west of the drive adjacent to the employee's entrance only - not to extend a general pedestrian path across the truck loading and compactor areas. 4. Depict a "stop -bar" 4 -feet behind the cross walks on Coronado Dr. and Second St. exit drives with stop signs and "rumble strips" on the ramps preceding the stop signs. * The stop signs and rumble strips need to be shown on the building plans. Crosswalk design shall be coordinated with Traffic Engineering. The above items shall be addressed prior to the issuance of a building permit. Engineering 1. There is a storm inlet in Second Street at the access to the trash compactor. Any modification to the inlet needed to accommodate a solid waste truck is the responsibility of the developer. *.Please acknowledge prior to CDB Storm Water 1. Prior to CDB, the site plan is to show a cross section at the walkway with existing and proposed elevations on NAVD 88 datum. The cross section is to reflect elevations of the roadway, curb and gutter as proposed on the plans for Beach Walk. *Staff is available to assist the developer in creating this cross - section. Stephen L. Doherty Engineering Specialist I Iry �...F � • steve.doherty @myclearwater.com (727) 562 -4773 Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Tuesday, February 06, 2007 7:33 AM To: Albee, Rick; Buysse, Beverly A.; Buzzell, William; Doherty, Steve; Dougall- Sides, Leslie; Everitt, Steven; Glenn, Tom; Gluski, Roberta; Kader, Art; Keller, James; Kurleman, Scott; Morris, William D.; Reid, Debbie; Rice, Scott; Rickard, Leonard; Tefft, Robert; Thompson, Neil; Watkins, Sherry Subject: FLD2007-01 001 /DVA2007-00001, 301 S. Gulfview Blvd. - Hyatt DRC members - Plans /documents have been resubmitted for the above referenced applications: A copy of the revised plans /documents have been placed on the cabinets outside of Rm 216 (do not.take a copy). Since this is on a fast -track to the CDB (February 20th) and City Council (March 1st), please review these plans /documents by noon on Wednesday, February 7, 2007. Please let me know when you have completed your review. If something can be made as a condition of approval, mark it such in Permit Plan as such. Thanks. Wayne • Wells, Wayne • From: Doherty, Steve Sent: Friday, January 26, 2007 2:12 PM To: Wells, Wayne; 'sszabo @foley.com' Subject: RE: FLD2007- 01001,229 and 301 South Gulfview Boulevard and 230, 300 and 304 Coronado Drive (Hyatt, aka Aqualea) Wayne,) discovered a typo in Traffic Engineering condition # 4. This condition requires the applicant to show a pedestrian path on the north side of Second Street. This message is to advise the applicant that the ped path is to be located on the south side of Second Street. I have made the correction in Permit Plan and apologize for any confusion this may have caused. Thanks, Stephen L. Doherty Engineering Specialist I steve.doherty @myclearwater.com (727) 562 -4773 - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Thursday, January 25, 2007 6:14 PM To: 'sszabo @foley.com' Cc: Albee, Rick; Buysse, Beverly A.; Buzzell, William; Doherty, Steve; Dougall- Sides, Leslie; Everitt, Steven; Glenn, Tom; Gluski, Roberta; Kader, Art; Keller, James; Kurleman, Scott; Morris, William D.; Reid, Debbie; Rice, Scott; Rickard, Leonard; Schodtler, John; Tefft, Robert; Thompson, Neil; Watkins, Sherry Subject: FLD2007- 01001, 229 and 301 South Gulfview Boulevard and 230, 300 and 304 Coronado Drive (Hyatt, aka Aqualea) Stephen - The DRC has reviewed the submitted Flexible Development application. Attached are the DRC comments that need to be addressed in an amended application and /or documents /plans for this case. While this case has been scheduled for the February 1, 2007, DRC meeting, it is not our intentions to meet with you on that day, since this is being fast - tracked to CDB (meaning, I can't wait that long). Should you have any questions regarding any of the comments, please contact me so that I can direct you to the appropriate person in the department you have concerns with the comments made. Please submit one original application and document, along with 14 copies, amended to reflect the attached comments by noon, Friday, February 2, 2007. This case has been scheduled for the February 20, 2007, Community Development Board (CDB) meeting at 1:00 pm in Council Chambers, 3rd Floor, City Hall, 112 S. Osceola Avenue, Clearwater, FL. Wayne 727 - 562 -4504 << File: draft 2.1.07 dre action agenda.pdf >> r f • rw' 11.00 am Case Number: FLD2007- 010iT1 -- 301 S GULFVIEW BLVD • Owner(s): Crystal Beach Capital Llc f� t • 7 101 E Kennedy Blvd Ste 2125 Tampa, F133602 TELEPHONE: No Phone, FAX: No Fax, E -MAIL: No Email Representative: Stephen J Szabo Iii 100 N Tampa St, Suite 2700 Tampa, F133602 TELEPHONE: 813- 225 -4193, FAX: No Fax, E -MAIL: No Email Location: 1.63 acres located between South Gulfview Boulevard and Coronado Drive at Third Street Atlas Page: UNK Zoning District: T, Tourist Request: Flexible Development approval to permit the elimination of a pedestrian overpass over South Gulfview Boulevard and to permit a standalone concession facility in lieu of the bridge landing area for such concessions for the Hyatt/Aqualea project, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2- 803.C. Proposed Use: Mixed use Neighborhood Clearwater Neighborhoods Coalition Association(s): Clearwater, F133758 P O Box 8204 TELEPHONE: No Phone, FAX: No Fax, E -MAIL: No Email Neighborhood Clearwater Beach Association Association(s): Clearwater, F133767 100 Devon Dr TELEPHONE: 443 -2168, FAX: No Fax, E -MAIL: papamurphy @aol.com Presenter: Wayne Wells, Planner III Attendees Included: City: Wayne Wells, Neil Thompson, Scott Rice, Steve Doherty, Jim Keller Applicant: Chris Bastas The DRC reviewed this application with the following comments: General Engineering: 1 . Show on the plan the location of the Coastal Construction Control Line (C.C.C.L.) and the relative location of the proposed concessions building. NOTE: A Florida D.E.P. permit is required for any construction seaward of the C.C.C.L. 2. Show sidewalk along Second Street (By Others). 3 . There is a storm inlet in Second Street at the access to the trash compactor. Any modifications to the inlet needed to accommodate a solid waste truck is the responsibility of the developer. Environmental: No issues Fire: 1 . Show the U.L. listing of having a MOBILE KITCHEN INSIDE a building,Examples that were demonstrated were for outdoor use. Acknowledge PRIOR to CDB. 2. Mobile Kitchen inside of the building, how will these units meet the requirements of NFPA 96 -2001 edition Standard for ventilation control and fire protection of commercial cooking operations ? Acknowledge PRIOR to CDB 3 . Mobile Kitchen on the South End has an EXIT from the inside of the building passing through it with fire seperation, how do you keep the fire seperation in this exit corridor, exits cannont pass through a kitchen ? Acknowledge PRIOR to CDB Harbor Master: 1 . No issues. Legal: I . No issues. Land Resources: 1 . No Issues. Landscaping: 1 . No issues. Development Review Agenda - Thursday, February 1, 2007 - Page 7 Parks and Recreation: • 1 . No issues Stormwater: Prior to CDB, the site plan is to show a cross section at the walkway with existing and proposed elevations on NAVD 88 datum. The cross section is to reflect elevations of the roadway,curb and gutter as proposed on the plans for Beach Walk. Solid Waste: No Comments Traffic Engineering: 1 . 1. Show on the plan the proposed pavement markings and signage for the crosswalk on Gulfview Boulevard. 2. Eliminate the two driveways along Gulfview Boulevard. Note: The northerly driveway does not meet 125' minimum distance between driveway and intersection per Community Development Code Sec. 3 -102 C.I. 3. Show on the plan crosswalk markings with ADA standard ramps for sidewalks along Gulfview Blvd. and Coronado Dr., crossing Second Street per FDOT index 304. 4. Show on the plan pedestrian pathway from sidewalk on south side of Second St. to the employee's entrance. The portion of the pathway in the driveway shall be located as close to the curb -line as possible to afford greater visibility for vehicles exiting the building. 5. Show on the plan ramps and a pedestrian crosswalk in front of vehicular ingress /egress drives on Coronado Dr. The crosswalk and ramps shall be positioned as close to the curb -line as possible to afford greater visibility for vehicles exiting the building. 6. Show on the plan a "stop -bar" 4 -feet behind the cross walks on Coronado Dr. and Second St. exit drives with stop signs and "rumble strips" on the ramps preceding the stop signs. Planning: The above items shall be addressed prior to the issuance of a building permit. General Note(s): 1. DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. Development Review Agenda - Thursday, February 1, 2007 - Page 8 I . Provide on Page 1 oithe application the Project Valuation. is 2. The parcel size is listed on Page 1 of the application as "approximately 1.56 acres." Unclear as to what "approximately" means. Additionally, under the prior applications for this site, the parcel size was listed as 1.63 acres. The square footage of the parcel previously submitted was 71,068 square feet (the FLD application states the parcel size is "approximately 67,950 square feet). Why the discrepancy? 3 . Revise Sheet A -3.00 to show more of the Beach Walk project on the left hand (west) side of the sheet, showing the entire concessions building (such is shown on Sheet A -3.00 submitted for the Minor Revision). 4. Provide an up -to -date signed and sealed survey (including legal description of property) - One original and 14 copies. 5. Since this site and the area to the west is located within a Velocity. Flood Zone, unclear how the concessions building will be constructed to meet FEMA requirements, including the building itself, electric, plumbing, etc. Advise. 6. Sheet A -3.00 - The western edge of the Beach Promenade Sidewalk between the New Gulfview Blvd. and the monumental stairs from the second/lobby floor needs to be completed (there is a gap in the edge connecting to the sidewalk crossing New Gulfview Blvd.). 7. Page 1 of the application requests the legal description of the property. The application states: "See Exhibit A attached hereto." There is no Exhibit A attached. Provide. 8. According to Mark Matheny in the Development Services Department, the fountain pump cannot be below BFE. Revise. 9. There is nothing being said as part of the application regarding the desire to have the two driveways for the mobile kitchen access. Provide a written request and all background information (copies of sample mobile kitchens). Staff is still not supportive of this portion of the request. 10. Revise the parcel numbers on Page 1 of the application to: 07/29/15/52380/000 /0570; 07/29/15/52380/000 /0580; and 07/29/15/52380/000 /1050. 11 . If it is your desire to have an active ground level on the west side of the building adjacent to the Beach Promenade with retail, restaurant and/or nightclub uses, this area must meet FEMA regulations. In addition, public toilet facilities are required for this area, in accordance with Section 403.6 of the Building Code - Plumbing. This would include public toilet facilities available for the handicapped. 12. If there is no actual design of the proposed concessions facility available now in order to provide four -sided building elevations, then there needs to be provided some design details for this proposed concessions facility (exterior materials, exterior colors, roof type, etc). There also needs to be some written material submitted as to what functions will occur within this concessions facility (what will be sold, what services provided, hours of operation, etc). Potentially some information from the adopted/recorded Development Agreement would be helpful. 13. The approved plan provided a pedestrian overpass over S. Gulfview Blvd. that allowed people parking in the 400 public parking spaces within the garage safe passage over the roadway between the parking garage and the beach. Proposal is to have pedestrians crossing S. Gulfview Blvd. at ground level but does not provide any information or details as to the alternative crosswalk will look like or how it operates to give an equal "safe passage" between the parking garage and the beach. 14. Revise Sheets A -1.01 and A -3.00 to show the sundial plaza. Plans right now could be read that the circle closest to the crosswalk is a landscaped area, not something people can walk on. 15. Submit Sheet A -1.01. 16. Potential condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: That approval of this Flexible Development case is subject to the approval of a Development Agreement with the City (Case DVA2007- 00001); 17. Need to submit as part of the application written material as to what the request is and why the request has been submitted (like why the pedestrian overpass is proposed to be eliminated), including what is proposed to replace the pedestrian overpass. Any details as to the proposed replacement access needs to be submitted to describe the alternative proposed. 1.8. Provide written responses to the six General Applicability criteria contained on Page 2 of the application. Responses need to explain HOW each criteria is achieved, in detail. Responses need to be specific to what changes are being requested. Development Review Agenda - Thursday, February 1, 2007 - Page 9 19 . Provide written responses to the six Comprehensive Infill Redevelopt Project criteria contained on Page 3 of the application. Responses need to explain HOW each criteria is achieved, in detail. Responses need to be specific to what changes are being requested. 20. Show on the plan the location of the Coastal Construction Control Line (CCCL) and the distance the proposed concessions building is from the CCCL. May need a setback reduction. Any construction allowed seaward of the CCCL will require approval of the State prior to the issuance of any building permit. Other: No Comments Notes: Scheduled for the February 20, 2007, CDB meeting. Development Review Agenda - Thursday, February 1, 2007 - Page 10 Case Number: FLD2007 -01001 -- 301 S GULFVIEW BLVD Owner(s): Crystal Beach Capital Llc �, 0 7 101 E Kennedy Blvd Ste 2125 Tampa, F133602 TELEPHONE: No Phone, FAX: No Fax, E -MAIL: No Email Representative: Stephen J Szabo Iii 100 N Tampa St, Suite 2700 Tampa, F133602 TELEPHONE: 813- 225 -4193, FAX: No Fax, E -MAIL: No Email Location: 1.63 acres located between South Gulfview Boulevard and Coronado Drive at Third Street Atlas Page: UNK Zoning District: T, Tourist Request: Flexible Development approval to permit the elimination of a pedestrian overpass over South Gulfview Boulevard and to permit a standalone concession facility in lieu of the bridge landing area for such concessions for the Hyatt/Aqualea project, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2- 803.C. Proposed Use: Mixed use Neighborhood Clearwater Neighborhoods Coalition Association(s): Clearwater, F133758 P O Box 8204 TELEPHONE: No Phone, FAX: No Fax, E -MAIL: No Email Neighborhood Clearwater Beach Association Association(s): Clearwater, F133767 100 Devon Dr TELEPHONE: 443 -2168, FAX: No Fax, E -MAIL: papamutphy @aol.com Presenter: Wayne Wells, Planner III Attendees Included: City: Wayne Wells, Neil Thompson, Scott Rice, Steve Doherty, Jim Keller, Tom Glenn Applicant: Stephen Szabo, Chris Bastas The DRC reviewed this application with the following comments: General Engineering: 1 . Show on the plan the location of the Coastal Construction Control Line (C.C.C.L.) and the relative location of the proposed concessions building. NOTE: A Florida D.E.P. permit is required for any construction seaward of the C.C.C.L. 2. Show sidewalk along Second Street (By Others). 3 . There is a storm inlet in Second Street at the access to the trash compactor. Any modifications to the inlet needed to accommodate a solid waste truck is the responsibility of the developer. Environmental: No issues Fire: 1 . Show the U.L. listing of having a MOBILE KITCHEN INSIDE a building,Examples that were demonstrated were for outdoor use. Acknowledge PRIOR to CDB. 2. Mobile Kitchen inside of the building, how will these units meet the requirements of NFPA 98 - Standard for ventilation control and fire protection of commercial cooking operations ? Acknowledge PRIOR to CDB 3 . Mobile Kitchen on the South End has an EXIT from the inside of the building passing through it with fire seperation, how do you keep the fire seperation in this exit corridor, exits cannont pass through a kitchen ? Acknowledge PRIOR to CDB Harbor Master: 1 . No issues. Legal: 1 . No issues. Land Resources: 1 . No Issues. Landscaping: 1 . No issues. Parks and Recreation: No issues Development Review Agenda - Thursday, February 1, 2007 - Page 13 Stormwater: • 1 . Prior to CDB, the site plan is to show a cross section at the walkway with existing and proposed elevations on NAVD 88 datum. The cross section is to reflect elevations of the roadway,curb and gutter as proposed on the plans for Beach Walk. Solid Waste: No Comments Traffic Engineering: 1 , 1. Show on the plan the proposed pavement markings and signage for the crosswalk on Gulfview Boulevard. 2. Eliminate the two driveways along Gulfview Boulevard. Note: The northerly driveway does not meet 125' minimum distance between driveway and intersection per Community Development Code Sec. 3 -102 C.3.. 3. Show on the plan crosswalk markings with ADA standard ramps for sidewalks along Gulfview Blvd. and Coronado Dr., crossing Second Street per FDOT index 304. 4. Show on the plan pedestrian pathway from sidewalk on north side of Second St. to the employee's entrance. The portion of the pathway in the driveway shall be located as close to the curb -line as possible to afford greater visibility for vehicles exiting the building. 5. Show on the plan ramps and a pedestrian crosswalk in front of vehicular ingress /egress drives on Coronado Dr. The crosswalk and ramps shall be positioned as close to the curb -line as possible to afford greater visibility for vehicles exiting the building. 6. Show on the plan a "stop -bar" 4 -feet behind the cross walks on Coronado Dr. and Second St. exit drives with stop signs and "rumble strips" on the ramps preceding the stop signs. Planning: The above items shall be addressed prior to the issuance of a building permit. General Note(s): 1. DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. Development Review Agenda - Thursday, February 1, 2007 - Page 14 1 . Provide on Page l o-f the application the Project Valuation. • 2. The parcel size is listed on Page 1 of the application as "approximately 1.56 acres." Unclear as to what "approximately" means. Additionally, under the prior applications for this site, the parcel size was listed as 1.63 acres. The square footage of the parcel previously submitted was 71,068 square feet (the FLD application states the parcel size is "approximately 67,950 square feet). Why the discrepancy? 3 . Revise Sheet A -3.00 to show more of the Beach Walk project on the left hand (west) side of the sheet, showing the entire concessions building (such is shown on Sheet A -3.00 submitted for the Minor Revision). 4. Provide an up -to -date signed and sealed survey (including legal description of property) - One original and 14 copies. 5. Since this site and the area to the west is located within a Velocity Flood Zone, unclear how the concessions building will be constructed to meet FEMA requirements, including the building itself, electric, plumbing, etc. Advise. 6. Sheet A -3.00 - The western edge of the Beach Promenade Sidewalk between the New Gulfview Blvd. and the monumental stairs from the second/lobby floor needs to be completed (there is a gap in the edge connecting to the sidewalk crossing New Gulfview Blvd.). 7. Page 1 of the application requests the legal description of the property. The application states: "See Exhibit A attached hereto." There is no Exhibit A attached. Provide. 8. According to Mark Matheny in the Development Services Department, the fountain pump cannot be below BFE. Revise. 9. There is nothing being said as part of the application regarding the desire to have the two driveways for the mobile kitchen access. Provide a written request and all background information (copies of sample mobile kitchens). Staff is still not supportive of this portion of the request. 10. Revise the parcel numbers on Page 1 of the application to: 07/29/15/52380/000 /0570; 07/29/15/52380/000 /0580; and 07/29/15/52380/000 /1050. 11 . If it is your desire to have an active ground level on the west side of the building adjacent to the Beach Promenade with retail, restaurant and/or nightclub uses, this area must meet FEMA regulations. In addition, public toilet facilities are required for this area, in accordance with Section 403.6 of the Building Code - Plumbing. This would include public toilet facilities available for the handicapped. 12 . If there is no actual design of the proposed concessions facility available now in order to provide four -sided building elevations, then there needs to be provided some design details for this proposed concessions facility (exterior materials, exterior colors, roof type, etc). There also needs to be some written material submitted as to what functions will occur within this concessions facility (what will be sold, what services provided, hours of operation, etc). Potentially some information from the adopted/recorded Development Agreement would be helpful. 13 . The approved plan provided a pedestrian overpass over S. Gulfview Blvd. that allowed people parking in the 400 public parking spaces within the garage safe passage over the roadway between the parking garage and the beach. Proposal is to have pedestrians crossing S. Gulfview Blvd. at ground level but does-not provide any information or details as to the alternative crosswalk will look like or how it operates to give an equal "safe passage" between the parking garage and the beach. 14. Revise Sheets A -1.01 and A -3.00 to show the sundial plaza. Plans right now could be read that the circle closest to the crosswalk is a landscaped area, not something people can walk on. 15. Submit Sheet A -1.01. 16. Potential condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: That approval of this Flexible Development case is subject to the approval of a Development Agreement with the City (Case DVA2007- 00001); 17. Need to submit as part of the application written material as to what the request is and why the request has been submitted (like why the pedestrian overpass is proposed to be eliminated), including what is proposed to replace the pedestrian overpass. Any details as to the proposed replacement access needs to be submitted to describe the alternative proposed. 18. Provide written responses to the six General Applicability criteria contained on Page 2 of the application. Responses need to explain HOW each criteria is achieved, in detail. Responses need to be specific to what changes are being requested. Development Review Agenda - Thursday, February 1, 2007 - Page 15 19 . Provide written responses to the six Comprehensive Infill Redevele t Project criteria contained on Page 3 of the application. Responses need to explain HOW each criteria is achieved, in detail. Responses need to be specific to what changes are being requested. 20. Show on the plan the location of the Coastal Construction Control Line (CCCL) and the distance the' proposed concessions building is from the CCCL. May need a setback reduction. Any construction allowed seaward of the CCCL will require approval of the State prior to the issuance of any building permit. Other: No Comments Notes: Scheduled for the February 20, 2007, CDB meeting. Development Review Agenda - Thursday, February 1, 2007 Page 16 Wells, Wayne From: Dougall- Sides, Leslie Sent: Thursday, January 25, 2007 1:30 PM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: RE: Hyatt FLD and DVA, 301 S. Gulfview Boulevard No, I did not have any comments. These appear to be pretty straightforward. Thanks.for asking! Leslie K. Dougall -Sides Assistant City Attorney City of Clearwater P.O. Box 4748 Clearwater, Florida 33758 (727) 562 -4010 phone (727) 562 -4018 fax Board Certified in City, County and Local Government Law Admitted in Florida, Oregon, and the District of Columbia Senior Professional in Human Resources - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Thursday, January 25, 2007 1:01 PM To: Dougall- Sides, Leslie Subject: Hyatt FLD and DVA, 301 S. Gulfview Boulevard Leslie - We recently sent to you the FLD2007 -01001 and DVA2007 -00001 cases regarding changes at the Hyatt project. Due to this project being fast - tracked to the February 20, 2007, CDB meeting and March 1, 2007, City Council meeting, I need to send out draft DRC comments later today. Do you have any comments on either the FLD or DVA cases? Wayne FIXTURES, FAUCETS AND FIXTURE FITT1K* value existing on October 1, 1992, unless the same was under design or construction, or under con- struction contract before October 1, 1992. 2. Assembly occupancy. The use of a building or structure, or any portion thereof, for the gathering together of people for purposes such as civic, so- cial or religious functions or for recreation, or for food or drink consumption, or awaiting transporta- tion. 3. Historic building. A building which is (a) listed on the National Register of Historic Places; (b) listed on the State Register of Historic Places; (c) listed on a municipal register of historic property, designated according to local ordinance; or (d) in- cluded in a district which is listed on a municipal, state or national register of historic property and which has been determined to contribute to the his- toric significance of the district. 403.1.1.2 Occupancy content calculation. The occu- pancy content of a building, which determines the num- ber of water closets required for men, shall be calculated using the square footage per person requirements estab- lished by the building code in effect in a jurisdiction. 403.1.2 Unisex toilet and bath fixtures. Fixtures located within unisex toilet and bathing rooms complying with Sec- tion 403.7 shall be included in determining the minimum re- quired number of fixtures for assembly and mercantile occupancies. 403.1.3 For the purposes of calculating the minimum num- ber of required plumbing facilities, the requirements of Ta- ble 403.1 shall apply to any areas outside of the building that are used as part of the building's designated occupancy (sin- gle or mixed). Where additional seating is also utilized in these areas, the actual number of seats shall be added to the number of persons calculated by Table 403.1 to obtain the total additional facilities required. 403.2 Separate facilities. Where plumbing fixtures are re- quired, separate facilities shall be provided for each sex. Exceptions: 1. Separate facilities shall not be required for private fa- cilities. 2. Separate employee facilities shall not be required in occupancies in which 15 or less people are employed. 3. Separate facilities shall not be required for food ser- vice establishments which seat 10 persons or less. 4. Separate facilities shall not be required in business and mercantile occupancies with a total floor area of 3,000 square feet (279 m?) or less. 403.3 Number of occupants of each sex. The required water closets, lavatories, and showers or bathtubs shall be distributed equally between the sexes based on the percentage of each sex anticipated in the occupant load. The occupant load shall be composed of 50 percent of each sex, unless statistical data ap- proved by the code official indicate a different distribution of the sexes (see also Section 403.1..1). 0 403.4 Location of employee toilet facilities in occupancies other than assembly or mercantile. Access to toilet facilities in occupancies other than mercantile and assembly occupan- cies shall be from within the employees' working area. Em- ployee facilities shall be either separate facilities or combined employee and public facilities. Exception: Facilities that are required for employees in storage structures or kiosks, and are located in adjacent structures under the same ownership, lease or control, shall be a maximum travel distance of 500 feet (152 m) from the employees' working area. 403.4.1 Travel distance. The required toilet facilities in oc- cupancies other than assembly or mercantile shall be located not more than one story above or below the employee's working area and the path of travel to such facilities shall not exceed a distance of 500 feet (152 m). Exception: The location and maximum travel distances to required employee toilet facilities in factory and industrial occupancies are permitted to exceed that required in Section 403.4.1, provided the location and maximum travel distance are approved by the code official. 403.5 Location of employee toilet facilities in mercantile and assembly occupancies. Employees shall be provided with toilet facilities in building and tenant spaces utilized as restau- rants, nightclubs, places of public assembly and mercantile oc- cupancies. The employee facilities shall be either separate facilities or combined employee and public facilities. The re- quired toilet facilities shall be located not more than one story above or below the employees' work area and the path of travel to such facilities, in other than covered malls, shall not exceed a distance of 500 feet (152 m). The path of travel to required fa- cilities in covered malls shall not exceed a distance of 300 feet (91m). Exception: Employee toilet facilities shall not be required in tenant spaces where the travel distance from the main en- trance of the tenant space to a central toilet area does not ex- ceed 300 feet (91m) and such central toilet facilities are located not more than one story above or below the tenant space. 403.6 Public facilities. Customers, patrons and visitors shall be provided with public toilet facilities in structures and tenant spaces intended for public utilization. Public toilet facilities shall be located not more than one story above or below the space required to be provided with public toilet facilities and the path of travel to such facilities shall not exceed a distance of 500 feet (152 m). 403.6.1 Covered malls. In covered mall buildings, the path of travel to required toilet facilities shall not exceed a dis- tance of 300 feet (91m). Facilities shall be installed in each individual store or in a central toilet area located in accor- dance with this section. The maximum travel distance to the central toilet facilities in covered mall buildings shall be measured from the main entrance of any store or tenant space. 403.6.2 Pay facilities. Where pay facilities are installed, such facilities shall be in excess of the required minimum fa- cilities. Required facilities shall be free of charge. 4.4 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE — PLUMBING • 0 Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Friday, January 19, 2007 1:32 PM To: Gilmore, Stephanie; Elmore, Nicole Cc: Watkins, Sherry Subject: FLD2007 -01001 and DVA2007- 00001, 229 and 301 South Gulfview Boulevard and 230, 300 and 304 Coronado Drive (Hyatt, aka Aqualea) Stephanie /Nicole - I know Sherry just brought over the information regarding the above cases for the February 20, 2007, CDB meeting. The parcel numbers on the applications are incorrect. The proper parcel numbers are: 07/29/15/52380/000 /0570 07/29/15/52380/000 /0580 07/29/15/52380/000/1050 Thanks. Wayne • Wells, Wayne • From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Friday, January.19, 2007 11:16 AM To: Albee, Rick; Bertels, Paul; Buszewski, Justyna; Buysse, Beverly A.; Buzzell, William; Chesney, Ed; Clayton, Gina; Doherty, Steve; Dougall- Sides, Leslie; Elbo, Bennett; Everitt, Steven; Glenn, Tom; Gluski, Roberta; Kader, Art; Keller, James; Kurleman, Scott; Maran, Robert (Bob); Morris, William D.; Reid, Debbie; Rice, Scott; Rickard, Leonard; Schodtler, John; Shoberg, Elliot E.; Tefft, Robert; Thompson, Neil; Vo, Phuong; Watkins, Sherry Cc: Delk, Michael; Clayton, Gina; Thompson, Neil Subject: FLD2007 -01001 and DVA2007- 00001, 301 S. Gulfview Boulevard DRC Members - Sherry will be distributing to you today the above referenced cases. This is the Hyatt/Aqualea project. The purpose of these applications is to eliminate the pedestrian overpass over S. Gulfview Blvd., replacing it with an at -grade crossing to allow people who.park in the Hyatt parking garage (400 public parking spaces) to access the beach and Beach Walk. These applications are NOT following normal time frames. These applications will be on the February 1, 2007, DRC agenda. HOWEVER, these cases are being scheduled for the February 20, 2007, CDB meeting. S0000 ... I need for you . to review these applications as soon as possible and let me know if there are problems with the application (I know of at least one - need to submit a survey). I need to be working on the Staff Report for these cases for the CDB (with the DVA Resolution scheduled for the March 1,2007, City Council meeting). Please have your comments in Permit Plan by 9 am, January 25, 2007, so that the comments can be discussed at the Pre -DRC meeting that morning, so that I can get them to make the necessary changes and resubmit for the CDB and City Council meetings in a timely fashion. If you have any questions, feel free to call me or come by. Thank you in advance for working quickly on these applications. Wayne Pi4 ellas County Property Ap P6 er Information: 07 29 15 52380 000 0 Page 2 of 5 f 07 / 29 / 18 / 52380 / 000 / 0570 19- Jan -2007 Jim Smith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 13:24:39 Ownership Information Uacant Property Use and Sales. CRYSTAL BEACH CAPITAL LLC OBK: 14120 OPG: 1340 101 E KENNEDY BLVD STE 2125 TAMPA FL 33602 -5189 COMBO IN PROCESS EVAC: A EUAC Comparable sales value as Prop Addr: 0 of Jan 1, 2006, based on Census Tract: 260.02 sales from 2004 — 2005: 0 Sale Date OR Book /Page Price (Qual /UnQ) Vac /Imp Plat Information 2 12,005 14,120/1,340 18,500,000 (M) I 1925: Book 013 Pgs 012 -013 8 /2,004 13,757/1,584 3,250,000 (M) I 0000: Book Pgs - 0 /1,965 2,162/ 111 562,500 (U) I 0000: Book Pgs - 0 /0 0/ 0 0 ( ) 2006 Value EXEMPTIONS Just /Market: 2,550,000 Homestead: NO Ownership % .000 Govt Exem: NO Use .000 Assessed /Cap: 2,550,000 Institutional Exem: NO Tax Exempt %: .000 Historic Exem: 0 Taxable: 2,550,000 Agricultural: 0 2006 Tax Information District: CU Seawall: Frontage: Clearwater View: 06 Millage: 21.7640 Land Size Unit Land Land Land Front x Depth Price Units Meth 06 Taxes: 55,498.20 1) 100 x 200 150.00 20, 000.00 S Special Tax :00 2) 0 x 0 .00 .00 3) 0 x .0 .00 .00 Without the Save -Our -Homes 4) 0 x 0 .00 .00 cap, 2006 taxes will be : 5) 0 x 0 .00 .00 55,498.20 6) 0 x 0 .00 .00 Without any exemptions, 2006 taxes will be 55, 498.20 Short Legal LLOYD- WHITE - SKINNER SUB LOTS 57 & 104 & S 2OFT OF Description LOTS 56 & 103 LESS E 1OFT OF LOT 104 & LESS E 10FT Building Information http : // l 36.174.187.13/htbin/cgi- click? o =1 &a =1 &b =1 &c =1 &r= .16 &s= 4 &t3 =1 &u= 0 &p =0... 1/19/2007 Pinellas County Property Ap er Information: 07 29 15 52380 000 00 07 29 / 15 / 52350 1 000 / 0570 Page 3 of 5 19- Jan -2007 Jim Smith, CFA Pinellas COunty Property Appraiser 13:24:39 Vacant Parcel Property Use: 000 Land Use: 10 Vacant Extra Fca�ures Description Dimensions Price Units Value RCD Year 1) .00 0 0 0 0 2) .00 0 0 0 0 3) .00 0 0 0 0 4) .00 0 0 0 0 5) .00 0 0 0 0 6) .00 0 0. 0 0 TOTAL RECORD VALUE: 0 Map With Property Address (non- vacant) J-1 �Fq I http : / /136.174.187.13/htbin/cgi- click ?o =1 &a =1 &b =1 &c =1 &r= .16 &s= 4 &t3 =1 &u= 0 &p =0... 1/19/2007 Pinellas County Property Ap er Information: 07 29 15 52380 000 0 Page 4 of 5 Y 1� N ■awy tiT 30-9 'DRONADO DP Nwft 0 DC 'c' N ADO ItJJ P GULFIVW R BLVD IE COp�RACi0 3 N C014" A D CORANADO ----4 nn 1/8 Mile Aerial Photograph (2002) http://136.174.187.131htbinlcgi-click?o=l&a=l&b=l&c=l&r--.16&s=4&t3=1,&u=O&p=O... 1/19/2007 P ellas County Property Apser Informat =orx 07 29 15 5238000) Pag. 5 of 5 Pinellas County. Property Appraiser Parcel Information http : / /136.174.187.131htbinlcgi- click ?o =1 &a =1 &b ='_ 8--= I &r= .16 &s=4 &13== &L =0 &:)=0... 1/19/20107 Pinellas County Property.Apser Information: 07 29 15 52380 000 1 0 Page 2 of 5 07 / 29 / 15 / 52350 / 000 / 0550 19- Jan -2007 Jim.Smith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 13:23:50 Ownership Information Uacant Property Use and Sales CRYSTAL BEACH CAPITAL LLC OBK: 14120 OPG: 1340 101 E KENNEDY BLVD STE 2125 TAMPA FL 33602 -5189 COMBO IN PROCESS EVAC: A EUAC Comparable sales value as Prop Addr: 0 of Jan 1, 2006, based on Census Tract: .00 sales from 2004 - 2005: 0 Sale Date OR Book /Page Price (Qual /UnQ) Vac /Imp Plat Information 2 /2,005 14,120/1,340 18,500,000 (M) I 1925: Book 013 Pgs 012 -013 8 /2,001 11,506/ 933 1,252,000 (Q) I 0000: Book Pgs - 0 /0 0/ 0 0 { ) 0000: Book Pgs - 0 /0 0/ 0 0 { ) 2006 Value EXEMPTIONS Just /Market: 2,103,800 Homestead: NO Ownership % .000. Govt Exem :. NO Use %: .000 Assessed /Cap: 2,103,800 Institutional Exem: NO Tax Exempt %: .000 Historic Exem: 0 Taxable: 2,103,800 Agricultural: 0 2006 Tax Information District: CW Seawall: Frontage: Clearwater View: 06 Millage: 21.7640 Land Size Unit Land Land Land Front x Depth Price Units Meth 06 Taxes: 45,787.10 1) 120 x 110 150. 00 16,500. 00 S Special Tax .00 2) 0 x 0 .00 .00 3) 0 x 0 .00 .00 Without the Save -Our -Homes 4) 0 x 0 .00 .00 cap, 2006 taxes will be 5) 0 x 0 .00 .00 45, 787.10 6) 0 x 0 . 00 . 00 Without any exemptions, 2006 taxes will be 45,787.10 Short Legal LLOYD - WHITE - SKINNER SUB LOTS 58 & 59 TOGETHER WITH Description S 1/2 UAC 3RD ST ADJ TO N .LESS E 10FT PER OR 14168/ Building Information http : //l 36.174.187.13/htbin/cgi- click? o =1 &a =1 &b =1 &c =1 &r= .16 &s= 4 &t3 =1 &u= 0 &p =0... 1/19/2007 Pinellas County Property Ap�yser Information: 07 29 15 52380 000 11 07 29 I 15 52380 1 000 I 0580 Page 3 of 5 19- Jan -2007 Jim Smith, CFA Pinellas COunty Property Appraiser 13:23:50 Vacant Parcel Property Use; 000 Land Use; i0 Vacant Extra F�a�ures Description Dimensions Price Units Value RCD Year 1) .00 0 0 0 0 2) .00 0 0 0 0 3) .00 0 0 0 0 4) .00 0 0 0 0 5) .00 0 0 0 0 6) 00 0 0 0 0 TOTAL RECORD VALUE; 0 Map With Property Address (non- vacant) F ® Fit FNFq http: //l 36.174.187.13/htbin/cgi- click ?o =1 &a =l &b =l &c =1 &r= .16 &s= 4 &t3 =1 &u= 0 &p =0... 1/19/2007 Pinillas County Property Appter Information: 07 29 15 52380 000 14 21S G iJ L F,,r i E'dtif BLVD BMW D ST 0 Page 4 of 5 — �~ - - -�I CORONA DR Lj1AE& -DR-- 3RD s r GULF 1VIEW ,--� BL'V'D 31 S CORONADO �DR N iORDNAD COP iNADO -�- DR R 1� 326 �J ORP�.IADC CpR GC II �r �? C IDO N itlip 5, a F�, L' +rG _..325_... r.Rnrvnn 1/8 Mile Aerial Photograph (2002) http : //l 36.174.187.13/htbin/cgi- click ?o =1 &a =1 &b =1 &c =1 &r= :16 &s= 4 &t3 =1 &u= 0 &p =0... 1/19/2007 Pinellas Connty Property Ap *er Infor_ a -don: 07 25 15 52380 000 4 Page 5 of 5 Pinellas County Property Appraiser Parc_ 1-1 Information ttp:'/ 135 174.187.13/htbin/cgi- click ?o =l &a =1 &:)=1 &�l !?zr —_ 16 &s =L&t3= i &u �&p =0... 1/19/2007 Pi.jellas County Property Appryser Information: 07 29 15 52380 000 0�0 Page 2 of 5 07 1 29 / 15 / 52380 / 000 / 1050 i9- Jan -2007 Jim Smith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 13:23:13 Ownership Information Uacant Property Use and Sales CRYSTAL BEACH CAPITAL LLC OBK: 14120 OPG: 1340 101 E KENNEDY BLVD STE 2125 TAMPA FL 33602 -5189 COMBO IN PROCESS EVAC: A EUAC Comparable sales value as Prop Addr: 0 of Jan 1, 2006, based on Census Tract: 260.02 sales from 2004 - 2005: 0 Sale Date OR Book /Page Price (Qual /UnQ) Vac /Imp Plat Information 2 /2,005 14,120/1,340 18,500,000 (M) I 1925: Book 013 Pgs 012 -013 8 /2,004 13,757/1,584 3,250,000 {M} I 0000: Book Pgs - 0 10 0/ 0 0 { } 0000: Book Pgs - 0 /0 0/ 0 0 { } 2006 Value EXEMPTIONS Just /Market: 1,663,900 Homestead: NO Ownership % .000 Govt Exem: NO Use %: .000 Assessed /Cap: 1,663,900 Institutional Exem: NO Tax Exempt %: .000 Historic Exem: 0 Taxable: 1,663,900 Agricultural: 0 2006 Tax Information District: Cu Seawall: Frontage: Clearwater View: 06 Millage: 21.7640 Land Size Unit Land. Land Land Front x Depth Price Units Meth 06 Taxes: 36,213.12 1) 145 x 90 150.00 13, 050. 00 S Special Tax .00 2) 0 x 0 .00 .00 3) 0 x 0 .00 . 00 Without the Save - Our -Homes 4) 0 x 0 .00 .00 cap, 2006 taxes will be 5) 0 x 0 .00 .00 .3 6, 213. 12 6) 0 x 0 .00 . 00 Without any exemptions, 2006 taxes will be 36, 213.12 Short Legal LLOYD - WHITE- SKINNER SUB LOTS 145 & 106 &,H+LY 112 Description OF LOT 107 LESS E 10FT THEREOF PER 15057/2479 Building Information http: // 136.174.187.13 /htbin /cgi- click? o =1 &a =1 &b =1 &c =1 &r= .16 &s= 4 &t3 =1 &u= 0 &p =0... 1/19/2007 Pinellas County Property Ap er Information: 07 29 15 52380 000 Of 07 / 29 / 15 / 52350 / 000 / 1050 Page 3 of 5 i9- Jan -2007 Jim Smith, CFA.Pinellas COunty Property Appraiser 13:23:12 Vacant Parcel Property Use: 000 Land Use: 10 Vac�nt Extra F�a�ur�s Description Dimensions Price Units Value RCD Year 1) .00 0 0 0 0 2) .00 0 0 0 0 3) .00 0 0 0 0 4) .00 0 0 0 0 5) .00 0 0 0 0 6) .00 0 0 0 0 TOTAL RECORD VALUE: 0 Map With Property Address (non- vacant) F*_1 F:�] Fil 14"'1 FQ R http: // l 36.174.187.13 /htbin/cgi- click ?o =1 &a =1 &b =1 &c =1 &r= .16 &s= 4 &t3 =1 &u= 0 &p =0... 1/19/2007 Pigellas County Property Ap *er Information: 07 29 15 52380 000 0 23c l EVE i U L F `V I EW 41 F--- -L - -- -_ f --� 1 1- 16) �-` 0 311 GULF-'VIEW BLVD i; G 316 0PNADO 32 GULFVIEVF 1/8 Mile Aerial Photograph (2002) C, 0 §,I'A D 0 T Page 4 of 5 http: //136.174.187.13 /htbin/cgi- click ?o =1 &a =1 &b =1 &c =1 &r= .16 &s= 4 &t3 =1 &u= 0 &p =0... 1/19/2007 Pinellas County Property Ap ser h1or-natim: 07 2) 15 52-180 0001 0 Page 5 of 5 Pinellas County Property A-pprais -.r- Parcel Information http : / /l36.174.187.13/htbin/cgi- click ?c-- -8m =1 & i =1 &cam &r=. _ 6&s =4&t3^ l &u =0 &per... 1/1x/2007 CITY OF CLEARWATER NOTICE OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD PUBLIC HEARINGS The Community Development Board of the City of Clearwater, Florida, will hold public hearings on Tuesday, February 20, 2007, beginning at 1:00 P.M., in the City Council Chambers, in City Hall, 3rd floor, 112 South Osceola Ave, Clearwater, Florida, to consider the following requests: NOTE: All persons wishing to address an item need to be present at the BEGINNING of the meeting Those cases that are not contested by the applicant, staff, neighboring property owners etc. will be placed on a consent agenda and approved by a single vote at the beginning of the meeting. 1. Don R. Whitehurst (Housh Ghovaee, Northside Engineering Services, Inc) are requesting Flexible Development approval to permit a mixed use (eight attached dwellings and 1,253 sq ft of retail floor area) in the Tourist District with a reduction to the front (west along Mandalay Ave.) setback from 15 ft to zero ft (to building), a reduction to the side (north) setback from 10 ft to 2.1 ft (to building), a reduction to the side (east) setback from 10 ft to zero ft (to trash staging area), an increase to building height from 35 ft to 58.83 ft (to midpoint of pitched roof), a reduction to required off - street parking from 22 spaces (16 spaces for attached dwellings; 6 spaces for retail sales) to 18 spaces and deviations to allow the building within the sight visibility triangles and to allow a reduction to the minimum vehicle stacking distance, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Sec 2- 803.C, and a reduction to the required foundation landscaping along Mandalay Avenue from 5 ft to zero ft, as a Comprehensive Landscape Program, under the provisions of Sec 3- 1202.G.; and (2) Transfer of Development Rights (TDR2006- 09031) of one dwelling unit from 689 Bay Esplanade, under the provisions of Sec 4 -1402. [Proposed Use: Mixed Use (8 attached dwellings and 1,253 sq ft of retail floor area).] at 635 Mandalay Ave., Mandalay Unit No. 2 Blk 84, Lots 1 & 2. Assigned Planner: Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Planner III. FLD2006- 09053/TDR2006 -09031 2. 2340 Drew Street LLC and Drew Professional Park Condominium Association, Inc. are requesting Flexible Development application to allow a Governmental Use within the Office (0) District at 2316 Drew St with a maximum building height of 38 ft; front (south) setbacks of 25 ft (to building) and 15 ft (to pavement); front (west) setbacks of 62 ft (to building) and 15 ft (to pavement); side (north) setbacks of 55 ft (to building) and 10 ft (to pavement); side (east) setbacks of 171 ft (to building) and zero ft (to pavement); a minimum off - street parking requirement of 3.76 parking spaces per 1,000 sq. ft of gross floor area; and to reduce the side (west) setback from 20 ft to zero ft (to existing pavement) for the existing Office and Medical Clinic uses at 2346 -2370 Drew St as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project pursuant to Sec. 2- 1004.13 of the Community Development Code along with a reduction to the side (north) perimeter landscape buffer from 12 ft to 10 ft, a reduction to the interior tree requirement from 25 to 19, and an increase to the maximum percentage of palms that can be incorporated into the landscape plan from 25% to 29% at 2316 Drew St; and a reduction to the side (west) perimeter landscape buffer from 5 ft to zero ft at 2346 -2370 Drew St. as part of a Comprehensive Landscape Program pursuant to Section 3- 1202.G of the Community Development Code. (Proposed Use: Governmental Use) at 2316, 2346, 2352, 2358. 2364 and 2370 Drew St., Rolling Heights Lots C —G, part of. Lot H lying west of Drew Professional Park Phase I. Assigned Planner: Robert G. Tefft, Planner III. FLD2006 -11062 3. Poulos Family Corp Inc., Boos - Gulf -to -Bay & Keene, LLC., D. Guy McMullen Prop. Inc. are requesting Flexible Development approval (1) to permit retail sales and service in the Commercial (C) District with a reduction to the front (north) setback from 25 ft to 15 ft (to parking lot), a reduction to the front (east) setback from 25 ft to 15 ft (to parking lot), an increase in allowable building height from 25 ft to 34 ft and to permit direct access to a major arterial street as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Program under the provisions of Sec. 2- 704.C; (2) to permit Non - Residential Off - Street Parking in the Medium Density Residential (MDR) District with the elimination of the required minimum 4 ft high wall landscaped on the external side.to screen A i f off - street parking spaces at the southwest corner and with outdoor lighting remaining on from dusk to dawn as a Residential Infill Project, under the provisions of Sec. 2- 304.G; (3) to permit a wall 8 ft high including the front setback in the (MDR) Medium Density Residential District under the provisions of Sec. 3- 804.A.1; (4) to permit a reduction to the perimeter landscape buffer width along a portion of the west side of the property from 12 ft to 10.4 ft as part of a Comprehensive Landscape Plan under the provisions of Sec. 3- 1202.G of the Community Development Code; and (5) the vacation of the northerly portion of the right of way of Florida Ave.. (Proposed Use: Retail Sales and Services) at 1765 and1771 Gulf To Bay Blvd & 515 Florida Ave., Suburb Beautiful Blk A, Lots 4 & 6, & part of Lots 2,3, & 5, Suburb Beautiful Blk B, Lots 1,2,5• &7. Assigned Planner: A. Scott Kurleman, Planner II. FLD2006 -11061 4. Crystal Beach Capital, LLC., (Hyatt, aka Aqualea) is requesting Flexible Development approval to permit the elimination of a pedestrian overpass over S. Gulfview Blvd. and to permit a standalone concession facility in lieu of the bridge landing area for such concessions for the Hyatt/Aqualea project, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Sec. 2- 803.C.. (Proposed Use: Hotel of 250 rooms (153.37 rooms /acre on total site), 18 attached dwellings (11.04 units /acre on total site) and a max. of 70,000 sq ft (0.98 FAR on total site) of amenities accessory to the hotel, at a ht of 150 ft (to roof deck).) at 229 & 301 S. Gulfview Blvd. and 230 300 and 304 Coronado Dr., Lloyd- White- Skinner Sub Lots 57 & 104 & Parts of Lots 56, 103 & 104 together with Vac 3 ra St, together with Vac E 35 ft of Gulfview Blvd., Lots 58 & 59 together with S '/z Vac 3rd St & Vac E 35 Ft of Gulfview Blvd, Lots 105 & 106 & part of Lot,107 together' with S' /2 of Vac 3rd St.. Assigned Planner: Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Planner III. FLD2007 -01001 $ Interested parties may appear and be heard at the hearing or file written notice of approval or objection with the Planning Director or City Clerk prior to the hearing. Any person who decides to appeal any decision made by the Board or Council, with respect to any matter considered at such hearings, will need to request a record of the proceedings and, for such purpose, may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based per Florida Statute 286.0105. Community Development Code Sec 4 -206 states that party status shall be granted by the Board in quasi - judicial cases if the person requesting such status demonstrates that s /he is substantially affected. Party status entitles parties to personally testify, present evidence, argument and witnesses, cross - examine witnesses, appeal the decision and speak on reconsideration requests, and needs to be requested and obtained during the case discussion before the CDB. An oath will be administered swearing in all persons giving testimony in quasi - judicial public hearing cases. If you wish to speak at the meeting, please wait to be recognized, then state and spell your name and provide your address. Persons without party status speaking before the CDB shall be limited to three minutes unless an individual is representing a group in which case the Chairperson may authorize a reasonable amount of time up to 10 minutes. Five days prior to the meeting, staff reports and recommendations on the above requests will be available for review by interested parties between the hours of 8:30 a.m. and 4:30 p.m., weekdays, at the City of Clearwater, Planning Department, 100 S. Myrtle Ave., Clearwater, FL 33756. Please contact the case presenter, at 562 -4567 to discuss any. questions or concerns . about the project and /or to better understand the proposal and review the site plan. Michael Delk Planning Director City of Clearwater P.O. Box 4748, Clearwater, FL 33758 -4748 NOTE: Applicant or representative must be present at the hearing. Cynthia E. Goudeau, MMC City Clerk 0 A COPY OF THIS AD IN LARGE PRINT IS AVAILABLE IN OFFICIAL RECORDS AND LEGISLATIVE SERVICES. ANY PERSON WITH A DISABILITY REQUIRING REASONABLE ACCOMMODATION IN ORDER TO PARTICIPATE IN THIS MEETING SHOULD CALL (727) 562 -4093 WITH THEIR REQUEST. To learn more about presenting to Clearwater boards and City Council, go to http:// clearwater .granicus.comNiewPublisher.php ?view id =11 and click on "Resident Engagement Video." You can also check the informational video out from any Clearwater public library. Ad: 2/8/07 ICL 0a ode / FLD 7 -01001 & DVA 2007 - 00001: 40 AMERICANA GULF MOTELS LTD PTR BASKIN, H H EST 325 S GULFVIEW BLVD OWENS, W D EST CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2445 516 N FT HARRISON AVE CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3905 BOLDOG, DOROTHY C THE M & J TRUST PO BOX 8589 CLEARWATER FL 33758 - 8589 Clearwater Neighborhoods Coalition Joe Evich, President P.O. Box 8204 Clearwater, FL 33758 CHRISTMAN, KENNETH R SR CHRISTMAN, LINDA J 225 CORONADO DR CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2431 CRYSTAL BEACH CAPITAL LLC 101 E KENNEDY BLVD STE 2125 TAMPA FL 33602 - 5189 CZAICKI, EDWARD DAM DEVON LLC CZAICKI, BOZENA 41 DEVON DR 332 HAMDEN DR CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2437 CLEARWATR BEACH FL 33767 - 2448 GIBSON, EVELYN L 1206 MELVIEW CT ST LOUIS MO 63125 - 4614 KALLAS, DORA KALLAS, GEORGE 3405 GULF BLVD BELLEAIR BCH FL 33786 - 3644 LITTLE, DAVID R 1734 CASEY JONES CT CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 1701 PANGS, STEVE S PANOS, FILITSA 109 DEVON DR CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2439 R T V PROPERTIES INC PO BOX 3835 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 8835 GIOVANNI, ROBERT KOZIK, CHRISTIAN 317 CORONADO ,DR # B CLEARWATER BEACH FL 33767 - 2433 KEYES, JAY F THE KEYES, JANET D THE 100 DEVON DR CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2438 MAZUR, JAN MAZUR, JANINA 216 HAMDEN DR CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2446 PAPPAS, TOM PAPPAS, ANASTASIA 115 DEVON DR CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2439 ROGERS, ROLAND 321 CORONADO DR CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2433 BOLDOG,CLARA BOLDOG, DOROTHY 2500 VIRGINIA AVE NW UNIT 1405 WASHINGTON DC 20037 - 1901 Clearwater Beach Association Jay Keyes 100 Devon Drive Clearwater, FL 33767 CUSTER, GERALD 2152 LONG BOW LN CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 6414 DECADE GULFCOAST LTD PTNSP STE 100 N19 W24130 RIVERWOOD DR WAUKESHA WI 53188 - 1131 K & P CLEARWATER ESTATE LLC 3105 W WATERS AVE STE 31 TAMPA FL 33614 - 2869 L O M INC 4100 N 28TH TERR HOLLYWOOD FL 33020 - 1116 MILO INVESTMENTS LLC 2101 BRICKELL AVE # 3407 MIAMI FL 33129 - QUINN, ANN E 225 HAMDEN DR CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2497 RUDMAN, MIRKO RUDMAN,ANKA 217 CORONADO DR CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2431 SEA CAPTAIN SHAH, MANNA J Stephen J. Szabo, III 526 BELLE ISLE 2221 NORWEGIAN DR # 33 100 North Tampa St, Ste 2700 Tampa, BELLEAIR BEACH FL 33786 - 3612 CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 2961 FL 33602 • SUNNY MOTEL LTD PTNSHP STE 100 N19 W24130 RIVERWOOD DR WAUKESHA WI 53188 - 1131 TAS, JERRY TAS,TERESA 342 HAMDEN DR CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2451 WELLER, HARRIETTE M 110 DEVON DR CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2438 SUNRISE ON THE BEACH INC, 229 CORONADO DR CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2431 TRACEY, CHRISTINA M 207 CORONADO DR CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2431 • SZLECHTA, WLODZIMIERZ KUNOWSKA, EWA 333 CORONADO DR CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2433 TROPICANA RESORT LAND TRUST 163 BAYSIDE DR CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2502 I CITY OF C LEARWATE R PLANNING DEPARTMENT POST OFFIci, Box 4748, CLFARWATFR, FLORIDA 33758 -4748 MUNICIPAL. SERVICES BUILDINIG, 100 SOU -1 -1-1 MYRl -113 AVF ?NUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 fELEPIioNe (727) 562 -4567 FAX (727) 562 -4865 LONG R.'VNGE PIANNFNG DF-M- OPIb1ENT RF,VII:W February 21, 2007 Mr. Stephen J. Szabo, III 100 North Tampa Street Suite 2700 Tampa, FL 33602 RE: Development Order - Case FLD2007 -01001 229 and 301 South Gulfview Boulevard and 230, 300 and 304 Coronado Drive (Hyatt, aka Aqualea) Dear Mr. Szabo: This letter constitutes a Development Order pursuant to Section 4- 206.D.6 of the Community Development Code. On February 20, 2007, the Community Development Board reviewed your request for Flexible Development approval to permit the elimination of a pedestrian overpass over South Gulfview Boulevard and to permit a standalone concession facility in lieu of the bridge landing area for such concessions for the Hyatt/Aqualea project, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2- 803.C. The Community Development Board (CDB) APPROVED the application with the following Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and Conditions of Approval: Findings of Fact: 1. That 1.56 acres is located between South Gulfview Boulevard and Coronado Drive at Third Street; 2. That the property is located within the Tourist (T) District and the Community Redevelopment District (CRD) Future Land Use Plan category; 3. That the Community Development Board (CDB) originally approved this project on February 20, 2001, under Cases FL 01 -01 -01 and DA 01- 01 -01, permitting a 250 -room hotel; 4. That on November 16, 2004, the CDB approved Case FLD2004- 07052, adding 24 rooms to the hotel and converting those additional rooms to 18 attached dwellings; 5. That the project is currently under construction; 6. That the approved project included a pedestrian overpass to provide access between the public parking in the hotel parking garage and the beach; 7. That the proposal is for the elimination of the pedestrian overpass on South Gulfview Boulevard; 8. That elimination of the pedestrian overpass would present a more aesthetically pleasing view, would not block views, would present a safer interface between motorists and pedestrians, would reduce long -term maintenance of the pedestrian walkway; 9. That the proposal provides for an alternative concession facility as a freestanding building rather than as part of the beach landing portion of the pedestrian overpass; and 10. That there are no outstanding Code Enforcement issues associated with the subject property. JOAN B11.!. JoNso,,', Cor, c:u n:ws!: < G\1:'!.![N A. 1'rrr!s.it!:, 0 )( N( "I"QUAL ENHILOYNIFNi AND !vl[ Aci inN I.; 1111, Viu;" J February 21, 2007 Szabo — Page Two Conclusions of Law: 1. That the development proposal is consistent with the Standards as per Tables 2 -801.1 and 2 -803 of the Community Development Code; 2. That the development proposal is consistent with the Flexibility criteria as per Section 2 -803.0 of the Community Development Code; and 3. That the development proposal is consistent with the General Standards for Level Two Approvals as per Section 3 -913 of the Community Development Code. Conditions of Approval: 1. That approval of this Flexible Development case is subject to the approval of a Development Agreement with the City (Case DVA2007- 00001); 2. That the final design of hotel building be consistent with conceptual elevations submitted and/or modified by the Community Development Board; 3. That the concession facility not exceed 1,200 square feet in area, be one -story in height and its design, materials and color be consistent with the hotel building and with Beach by Design guidelines and be designed to meet FEMA requirements within a Velocity Flood Zone; 4. That, prior to the issuance of the building permit for the concession facility, the State Department of Environmental Protection approve its location seaward of the Coastal Construction Control Line; and 5. That any modification to the stormwater inlet at the southwest corner of Coronado Drive and the new Second Street be the responsibility of the hotel developer. Pursuant to Section 4 -407, an application for a building permit shall be made within one year of Flexible Development approval (February 20, 2008). All required certificates of occupancy shall be obtained within two years of the date of issuance of the building permit. Time frames do not change with successive owners. The Community Development Coordinator may grant an extension of time for a period not to exceed one year and only within the original period of validity. The Community Development Board may approve one additional extension of time after the community development coordinator's extension to initiate a building permit application. The issuance of this Development Order does not relieve you of the necessity to obtain any building permits or pay any impact fees that may be required. In order to facilitate the issuance of any permit or license affected by this approval, please bring a copy of this letter with you when applying for any permits or licenses that require this prior development approval. Additionally, an appeal of a Level Two approval (Flexible Development) may be initiated pursuant to Section 4 -502.13 by the applicant or by any person granted party status within 14 days of the date of the CDB meeting. The filing of an application/notice of appeal shall stay the effect of the decision pending the final determination of the case. The appeal period for your case expires on March 7, 2007 (14 days from the date of the CDB meeting). If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call Wayne M. Wells, Planner III, at 727 -562 -4504. You can access zoning information for parcels within the City through our website: www.myclearwater.com/ og v/depts /planning. February 21, 2007 Szabo — Page Three Sincerely, Michael Del , AICP Planning Director S: IPlanning DepartmenIIC D BIFLEX (FLD) IInactive or Finished ApplicationslGulfview S 0301 Hyatt.Aqualea (7) - Approve&Gulfview S301 Development Order 2.21.07.doc ORIGIW EEt'hROk RECEREE ai id:E;" JAN 18 ?M6 Mg4tMG DEPJQTMEt4l III r%r. ri FAMATER ILI, MIN, wig W� v ow I I I ORIGIW EEt'hROk RECEREE ai id:E;" JAN 18 ?M6 Mg4tMG DEPJQTMEt4l III r%r. ri FAMATER ILI, MIN, CONCESSION PAVILION rTr 1> =a DUNE Mi > t3l LL� m6i F SUNDIAL PLAZA SHADE STRUCTURE GRANDSTAIR'WAY AND PLANT ER 16TH FLOOR UNITTERRACE SECONDST 8T H FLOOR 3 DECK L11 !:I I L ior J 40, LT Tf� A I ENTRANCE CANOPY I 1111008 * F ril I Wi "I \]\S 1 N.51-1 -SPA t I LRBLACA 0 u li 16TH FLOOR I. \IF TERRACE 81 H FLOOR GRILLTLRRACE AQUALEA NJR DEVELOPMENT DIXIATHROP & ASSOCIAM JANUARY 29, 2007 NEW BLDG. FL. FIN. 5.25 SIDEWALK (BY OIHLf?S) TIC EL. 4.92 FUTURE ROAD----) -1 Ur I/VLF-I EL. 4.3 C/ nPF Co? 270 A 0 STORM PIPE SCHEDULE STRUCTURE TO PIPE LENGTH PIPE PIPE PIPE SLOPE STRUCTURE (FT) SIZE TYPE I35 U 98 9'x30" Ep, cp —C/O) 0.79 �b 77 '9 "X,30 FRCP 0.26 STORM STRUCTURE TABLE jk, STRUCTURE11 STRUCTURETYPE TOP ELEV 17VV ELEV CONTROL STRUCTURE 4.05 0.75 T (SEE DETAIL) JUNCTION BOX F.D.O.T. - 1.8(N) INDEX 200 TYPE 'P, ALT 3,8 D. o(w) NEW H TYPE 'Y' INLET (BY CITY) 3.2 -2.0 TYPE CI 'YTY) ' INLET ( BY 3.2 0.0 MANHOLE (BY CITY) J.j -011(C-JO) -2.43(0 -23) C-31 -2.46(0 -39) NEW 8" PVC (BY CITY) TYPE "C" INLET 4.5 2,0 NEW 8" D.tP. DOLYWRAPPED TO 2 TYPE "C" INLET 4.j 2.0 :7RE PUMP ROOM EW CURB INLET �By CITY) 4.5 1. 7(N&S) NEW 8'W TAD P. IIA11,1C -- 1.0(E) -1 Ur I/VLF-I EL. 4.3 C/ nPF Co? 270 A 0 STORM PIPE SCHEDULE STRUCTURE TO PIPE LENGTH PIPE PIPE PIPE SLOPE STRUCTURE (FT) SIZE TYPE I35 U 98 9'x30" Ep, cp —C/O) 0.79 �b 77 '9 "X,30 FRCP 0.26 FL F�FREVISIONS B Q _ 37 19 "x30" E;rCP 1.08 BY CITY Q " I35 40 15 p 0,52 BY CITY (RE140 VE BY CITY) r 5A,' t "VAN i TOP EL 3.26 CORE NEW 8" SAA TO A H. @ EX. OP U6 60 15" Pt-,P` 0.5 I35 15 RCP 2.25 lk� i B TJJJR D S TREE T & ss s it THE T THS DRAWING IS AN INSTRUMENT OF SERVICE AND SHALL REMAIN THE PROPERTY OF THE ENGINEER, AND SHALL NOT BE REPRODUCED, PUBLISHED OR USED IN ANY WAY WITHOUT IS G1 CONSENT OF THE ENGINEER. (C)COPYRIGHT 2006 NOT PUBLISHED RAM A. GOEL, PhA, P.E. #47431 COPIES OF THESE PLANS ARE NOT VALID UNLESS EMBOSSED WITH THE SIGNING ENGINEER'S SEAL C�. lk� jk, it THE T THS DRAWING IS AN INSTRUMENT OF SERVICE AND SHALL REMAIN THE PROPERTY OF THE ENGINEER, AND SHALL NOT BE REPRODUCED, PUBLISHED OR USED IN ANY WAY WITHOUT IS G1 CONSENT OF THE ENGINEER. (C)COPYRIGHT 2006 NOT PUBLISHED RAM A. GOEL, PhA, P.E. #47431 COPIES OF THESE PLANS ARE NOT VALID UNLESS EMBOSSED WITH THE SIGNING ENGINEER'S SEAL C�. Zoning Land Tourist District AC SF SPACE PROPOSED -AC NONSF SPACE Proposed Land Use ZOM40 Mixed use 250 51,555 RFH overnight 56, 32 accomodation units + USAGE. 18 CONDO LWTS 18 Condominium units Maximum Building Height LOT AREA- 150'-Ow Lit iz 168 UNITS PER ACRE 70,999 S.F. [ CONSCTION TYPE ::::�U ail in Type N SrTE DATA a., AC SF SPACE PROPOSED -AC NONSF SPACE T ZOM40 6,465 51,555 RFH LAND USE: 56, 32 250 HOTEL UNITS USAGE. 18 CONDO LWTS 0�0 70299 OF. LOT AREA- U3 ACRES) DENS" 168 UNITS PER ACRE 1,375 (HOTEL UNITS) 5 BLDCL FRONT. 1,185 SET13ACKD LU SIDE, 01 L*L BLDGL HE301-M, ISO, PA 861 S.F. (V.UAI 1,182 WERVIOUS SURFACE RATIO: 66to489 08F. 4) 71 8 OPEN SPACE- Ass SP. (U. + X OF GROSS SITE) (ex) P 753 SPACES PARKING cALotil-ATIONS; 250 HOTEL LUM X 1 PARKING SPACE PER UNIT 250 SPACES 22,745_ 18 CONDO LUTS X tS SPACES PSI LINIT - 2Z- SPA = TOTAL REOLVIED 277 SPACES 758 TOTAL SPACES PROVIDED L277 TOTAL SPACES SPA cEs REMANM OF WHICH 400 ARE FOR PUBLIC USE l zL LEVELS�, a., AC SF SPACE GARAGE SF -AC NONSF SPACE 1 01/23/07 6,465 51,555 6,387 2 56, 32 5,339 5060 3 0�0 4,573 45,238 506 4 1,375 47,576 5 1,185 47,393 LU 6 1.0237 17,390 7 1,182 47,380 ISSUED FOR PERMIT RESUBMITTA 71 8 9,504 35,005 3,699 8 L_Aw # 06-037___j 8,317 22,745_ 9 4,485 10 4,533 11 4,533 12 4,533 14 4,533 15 8,300 16 31508 17 3,469 51010 TOTAL 128,664 SF 296,876 SF 51,950 SF PARKING LEGEND a., PUBUC PARKING SPACES (P) 0=) ■ PRIVATE CONDO SPACES (PC) 100 18, 01/23/07 U Addendum No 5 0 U) li.-Iolyle=oav:�Zzillf��:**axwi--Nl:iw-y.flI 0 N w X N X X I m rN X X 17-STORY CONDO/HOTEL BUILDING w -N' IN w 17-STORY illmw f. 01 -M 09 PIE MI WE N 8r5943, a., II J 0=) w 100 18, X I 14110 R E-1 A -3 �v U) a., UJI 0 01/23/07 U Addendum No 5 0 U) LJJ 0�0 0 j LL— U-1 M 0 LU w < L1j w ISSUED FOR PERMIT RESUBMITTA JANUARY 23, 2007 2450 L_Aw # 06-037___j Addendum No 1 a., 01/18/07 Addendum No 2 01/23/07 U Addendum No 5 02/01/07 ISSUED FOR PERMIT RESUBMITTA JANUARY 23, 2007 2450 L_Aw # 06-037___j a., C= U LU WON # ca 4 m J vs ,8 ♦ = • "` # FEA NFIP ZONE VE 14 (bete flood 14.0) i # �rj 01L X I -z Q S2 I r 0 m W s 0 cs� owffl SECTION 7&8 TOWNSHIP 29 SOUTH RANGE 15 EAST �O 0'`y LB 2610 TOGETHER WITH LOT 105, LOT 106, AND THE NORTH HALF OF LOT 107, OF " PC THE LLOYD — WHITE— SKINNER SUBDIVISION, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 13, SCIR 1/2" PAGE 12, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA. EDC;E OF aA $--�Y LB 4513 ►i r ZUW In r'KUrtn I v LiNt car LU I b/ AND LU I 1U4, AND THE SOUTH BY THE Q 'MGE aF P�YeMekr & NORTH PROPERTY LINE OF LOT 58 AND LOT 105. FIR 5/8" LB 3889 POINT ON A CUR TOGETHER WITH THE EAST 35.00 FEET OF A 70,00 FOOT RIGHT —OF —WAY OF CURVE TABLE -- ---.._ f �1 WESTERLY EXTENSION OF A LINE LYING 20 FEET NORTH OF AND PARALLEL FCIR 5 8" / WITH THE NORTH PROPERTY LINE OF LOTS 57 AND 104, AND ON THE SOUTH j LB 3889 P BY THE WESTERLY EXTENSION OF THE SOUTH LINE OF LOT 59. jryq m�yM� V 0 a oot LESS AND EXCEPT THE EAST 10.00 FEET THEREOF. —�—� CONTAINING 1.563 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. w FPK &D COMMENCE THE THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE SOUTH 20.00 FEET OF LOT 6 LB 2610 w m PK NAIL AND DISC L.B. 2610; THENCE, N.83 °5457 "W., ALONG THE NORTH co BOUNDARY OF THE SOUTH 20.00 FEET OF SAID LOT 103 10.00 FEET TO THE r POINT OF BEGINNING, A FOUND 1/2" CAPPED IRON ROD L.B. 4513; THENCE "W t— 5.06'05'03 >, 105.06 FEET TO A FOUND 1/2" CAPPED IRON ROD L.B. 4513, +� ep i # R e3 TO THE RIGHT, 199.76 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 1'50'27" (CHORD "W), 199.75 FEET, BEARING 5.07'00'17 TO A FOUND 1/2" CAPPED IRON ROD a L.B. 4513; THENCE NON — TANGENT FROM SAID CURVE, N.81'59'43 "W., 90.18 i i • ' i i ��' i o 6,127,52 FEET; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE TO THE LEFT, 18.89 y^" '.--.' FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 00'10'36" (CHORD 18.89 FEET, BEARING N,08'53'38 "E.) TO A FOUND 4 "X4" CONCRETE MONUMENT; THENCE j Z NON — TANGENT FROM SAID CURVE, N.82i5'44 "W., 145.16 FEET TO A POINT ON tf } A NON — TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE NORTHWEST AND HAVING A RADIUS OF �t4 O t THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE TO THE LEFT, 173.68 FEET THROUGH "E.) C.0 A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 01'39'48" (CHORD 173,67 FEET, BEARING N.06`54`57 Q TANGENCY; THENCE N.06`05'03 105.06 FEET TO A FOUND PK NAIL & DISC c a L.B. 2610, SAID POINT BEING ON THE NORTH BOUNDARY OF THE SOUTH 20.00 70 A113 FEET OF LOTS 103 AND 56 EXTENDED; THENCE ALONG SAID NORTH 00 BOUNDARY, 5.83'54'57 "E., 235.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. y, n m i +.i •ri 'i I>� NOTES, a- r ( © m 8 FEMA NFIP ZONE 3. SURVEY CREW: TOM RYAN AND JEREMEY MAYFIELD ui ''t AE 11 Q 4. NO UNDERGROUND INSTALLATIONS OR IMPROVEMENTS HAVE BEEN LOCATED EXCEPT z x ® (base flood 11,0) eT7 V- 5. NO INSTRUMENTS OF RECORD REFLECTING EASEMENTS, RIGHT OF WAY AND /OR OWNERSHIP p WERE FURNISHED TO THIS SURVEYOR EXCEPT AS SHOWN. ) o � (j ► .r ca STRICT ACCORDANCE WITH THE MINIMUM TECHNICAL STANDARDS SET FORTH IN CHAPTER FPK &D 61G17 -6, FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE. FCM 4" LB 2610 0 POINT OF TANGENCY , • - '• • -• i r -•'r • `i "► i'- pill HOMO ca 4 m J vs ,8 ♦ = • "` # FEA NFIP ZONE VE 14 (bete flood 14.0) i # �rj 01L X I -z Q S2 I r 0 m W s 0 cs� owffl SECTION 7&8 TOWNSHIP 29 SOUTH RANGE 15 EAST �O 0'`y LB 2610 TOGETHER WITH LOT 105, LOT 106, AND THE NORTH HALF OF LOT 107, OF " PC THE LLOYD — WHITE— SKINNER SUBDIVISION, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 13, SCIR 1/2" PAGE 12, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA. EDC;E OF aA $--�Y LB 4513 ►i r ZUW In r'KUrtn I v LiNt car LU I b/ AND LU I 1U4, AND THE SOUTH BY THE Q 'MGE aF P�YeMekr & NORTH PROPERTY LINE OF LOT 58 AND LOT 105. FIR 5/8" LB 3889 POINT ON A CUR TOGETHER WITH THE EAST 35.00 FEET OF A 70,00 FOOT RIGHT —OF —WAY OF CURVE TABLE -- ---.._ f �1 WESTERLY EXTENSION OF A LINE LYING 20 FEET NORTH OF AND PARALLEL FCIR 5 8" / WITH THE NORTH PROPERTY LINE OF LOTS 57 AND 104, AND ON THE SOUTH j LB 3889 P BY THE WESTERLY EXTENSION OF THE SOUTH LINE OF LOT 59. jryq m�yM� V 0 a oot LESS AND EXCEPT THE EAST 10.00 FEET THEREOF. —�—� CONTAINING 1.563 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. w FPK &D COMMENCE THE THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE SOUTH 20.00 FEET OF LOT 6 LB 2610 w m PK NAIL AND DISC L.B. 2610; THENCE, N.83 °5457 "W., ALONG THE NORTH co BOUNDARY OF THE SOUTH 20.00 FEET OF SAID LOT 103 10.00 FEET TO THE r POINT OF BEGINNING, A FOUND 1/2" CAPPED IRON ROD L.B. 4513; THENCE "W t— 5.06'05'03 >, 105.06 FEET TO A FOUND 1/2" CAPPED IRON ROD L.B. 4513, +� ep HAVING A RADIUS OF 6,227.52 FEET, THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE e3 TO THE RIGHT, 199.76 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 1'50'27" (CHORD "W), 199.75 FEET, BEARING 5.07'00'17 TO A FOUND 1/2" CAPPED IRON ROD a L.B. 4513; THENCE NON — TANGENT FROM SAID CURVE, N.81'59'43 "W., 90.18 FEET TO A FOUND 5/8 CAPPED IRON ROD L.B. 3889, ALSO BEING A POINT W o 6,127,52 FEET; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE TO THE LEFT, 18.89 y^" '.--.' FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 00'10'36" (CHORD 18.89 FEET, BEARING N,08'53'38 "E.) TO A FOUND 4 "X4" CONCRETE MONUMENT; THENCE j Z NON — TANGENT FROM SAID CURVE, N.82i5'44 "W., 145.16 FEET TO A POINT ON tf } A NON — TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE NORTHWEST AND HAVING A RADIUS OF �t4 O t THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE TO THE LEFT, 173.68 FEET THROUGH "E.) C.0 A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 01'39'48" (CHORD 173,67 FEET, BEARING N.06`54`57 Q TANGENCY; THENCE N.06`05'03 105.06 FEET TO A FOUND PK NAIL & DISC c a L.B. 2610, SAID POINT BEING ON THE NORTH BOUNDARY OF THE SOUTH 20.00 70 A113 FEET OF LOTS 103 AND 56 EXTENDED; THENCE ALONG SAID NORTH 00 BOUNDARY, 5.83'54'57 "E., 235.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. y, n m CONTAINING 1.563 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. c1q I>� NOTES, a- 1, TYPE OF SURVEY: BOUNDARY SURVEY ( © m 8 FEMA NFIP ZONE 3. SURVEY CREW: TOM RYAN AND JEREMEY MAYFIELD ui ''t AE 11 Q 4. NO UNDERGROUND INSTALLATIONS OR IMPROVEMENTS HAVE BEEN LOCATED EXCEPT z x ® (base flood 11,0) eT7 V- 5. NO INSTRUMENTS OF RECORD REFLECTING EASEMENTS, RIGHT OF WAY AND /OR OWNERSHIP p WERE FURNISHED TO THIS SURVEYOR EXCEPT AS SHOWN. ) o � (j ---. ca STRICT ACCORDANCE WITH THE MINIMUM TECHNICAL STANDARDS SET FORTH IN CHAPTER FPK &D 61G17 -6, FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE. FCM 4" LB 2610 0 POINT OF TANGENCY , ca 4 m J vs ,8 ♦ = • "` # FEA NFIP ZONE VE 14 (bete flood 14.0) i # �rj 01L X I -z Q S2 I r 0 m W s 0 cs� owffl SECTION 7&8 TOWNSHIP 29 SOUTH RANGE 15 EAST �O 0'`y LB 2610 TOGETHER WITH LOT 105, LOT 106, AND THE NORTH HALF OF LOT 107, OF " PC THE LLOYD — WHITE— SKINNER SUBDIVISION, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 13, SCIR 1/2" PAGE 12, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA. EDC;E OF aA $--�Y LB 4513 ►i r ZUW In r'KUrtn I v LiNt car LU I b/ AND LU I 1U4, AND THE SOUTH BY THE Q 'MGE aF P�YeMekr & NORTH PROPERTY LINE OF LOT 58 AND LOT 105. FIR 5/8" LB 3889 POINT ON A CUR p X13 vo�� I OF CD TOGETHER WITH THE EAST 35.00 FEET OF A 70,00 FOOT RIGHT —OF —WAY OF CURVE TABLE -- ---.._ f �1 WESTERLY EXTENSION OF A LINE LYING 20 FEET NORTH OF AND PARALLEL FCIR 5 8" / WITH THE NORTH PROPERTY LINE OF LOTS 57 AND 104, AND ON THE SOUTH j LB 3889 P BY THE WESTERLY EXTENSION OF THE SOUTH LINE OF LOT 59. LESS AND EXCEPT THE EAST 10.00 FEET THEREOF. —�—� CONTAINING 1.563 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. OR BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCE THE THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE SOUTH 20.00 FEET OF LOT 6 103, OF LLOYD — WHITE— SKINNER SUBDIVISION, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 13, w PAGE 12, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA, A FOUND PK NAIL AND DISC L.B. 2610; THENCE, N.83 °5457 "W., ALONG THE NORTH r t 3( p X13 vo�� I OF CD TOGETHER WITH THE EAST 35.00 FEET OF A 70,00 FOOT RIGHT —OF —WAY OF ' r GULF VIEW BOULEVARD TO BE VACATED; BOUNDED ON THE NORTH BY THE -- ---.._ f �1 WESTERLY EXTENSION OF A LINE LYING 20 FEET NORTH OF AND PARALLEL FCIR 5 8" / WITH THE NORTH PROPERTY LINE OF LOTS 57 AND 104, AND ON THE SOUTH j LB 3889 P BY THE WESTERLY EXTENSION OF THE SOUTH LINE OF LOT 59. LESS AND EXCEPT THE EAST 10.00 FEET THEREOF. —�—� CONTAINING 1.563 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. OR BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCE THE THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE SOUTH 20.00 FEET OF LOT 6 103, OF LLOYD — WHITE— SKINNER SUBDIVISION, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 13, w PAGE 12, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA, A FOUND PK NAIL AND DISC L.B. 2610; THENCE, N.83 °5457 "W., ALONG THE NORTH r t 3( BOUNDARY OF THE SOUTH 20.00 FEET OF SAID LOT 103 10.00 FEET TO THE r POINT OF BEGINNING, A FOUND 1/2" CAPPED IRON ROD L.B. 4513; THENCE "W 5.06'05'03 >, 105.06 FEET TO A FOUND 1/2" CAPPED IRON ROD L.B. 4513, +� ALSO BEING A POINT OF CURVATURE OF A CURVE CONCAVE NORTHWEST AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 6,227.52 FEET, THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE TO THE RIGHT, 199.76 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 1'50'27" (CHORD "W), 199.75 FEET, BEARING 5.07'00'17 TO A FOUND 1/2" CAPPED IRON ROD a L.B. 4513; THENCE NON — TANGENT FROM SAID CURVE, N.81'59'43 "W., 90.18 FEET TO A FOUND 5/8 CAPPED IRON ROD L.B. 3889, ALSO BEING A POINT ON A NON — TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE NORTHWEST AND HAVING A RADIUS OF o 6,127,52 FEET; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE TO THE LEFT, 18.89 y^" '.--.' FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 00'10'36" (CHORD 18.89 FEET, BEARING N,08'53'38 "E.) TO A FOUND 4 "X4" CONCRETE MONUMENT; THENCE j Z NON — TANGENT FROM SAID CURVE, N.82i5'44 "W., 145.16 FEET TO A POINT ON a A NON — TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE NORTHWEST AND HAVING A RADIUS OF �t4 5,982.52 FEET, SAID POINT BEING A FOUND PK NAIL & DISC L.B. 2610; t THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE TO THE LEFT, 173.68 FEET THROUGH "E.) 0 0 A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 01'39'48" (CHORD 173,67 FEET, BEARING N.06`54`57 TO A FOUND PK NAIL & DISC L.B. 2610, ALSO BEING THE POINT OF "E., TANGENCY; THENCE N.06`05'03 105.06 FEET TO A FOUND PK NAIL & DISC c a L.B. 2610, SAID POINT BEING ON THE NORTH BOUNDARY OF THE SOUTH 20.00 70 A113 FEET OF LOTS 103 AND 56 EXTENDED; THENCE ALONG SAID NORTH ® a BOUNDARY, 5.83'54'57 "E., 235.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. y, 7 -,,) p �51NN .._ m CONTAINING 1.563 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. b. I>� NOTES, a D ��SAN_ 1, TYPE OF SURVEY: BOUNDARY SURVEY 2. DATE OF SURVEY: JANUARY 17, 2007 © m 8 FEMA NFIP ZONE 3. SURVEY CREW: TOM RYAN AND JEREMEY MAYFIELD ui ''t AE 11 Q 4. NO UNDERGROUND INSTALLATIONS OR IMPROVEMENTS HAVE BEEN LOCATED EXCEPT z x ® (base flood 11,0) AS SHOWN. 5. NO INSTRUMENTS OF RECORD REFLECTING EASEMENTS, RIGHT OF WAY AND /OR OWNERSHIP p WERE FURNISHED TO THIS SURVEYOR EXCEPT AS SHOWN. 6. THIS SURVEY DOES NOT REFLECT NOR DETERMINE OWNERSHIP. � (j 7. ALL MEASUREMENTS, DISTANCES, ELEVATIONS AND FEATURES SHOWN WERE PERFORMED IN tj � STRICT ACCORDANCE WITH THE MINIMUM TECHNICAL STANDARDS SET FORTH IN CHAPTER 61G17 -6, FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE. FCM 4" --- -------- .--- r -... +r • 0 ,j! • 1 co ul Cc 0 1 r► W �i • ,, to 0 to 0 0 CL L ,t ` A, , r - a f • s ii 'Y 11 f Cj I tit � CL UJ C- E l.L. ccs 0 UJ Ci m i, t ' r r r Lu DO V) DO p i C.0 y a X Lu DO V) DO p C.0 X V I y^" '.--.' cn CL C-4 LiJ 0 0 e-- 12-Qk_— f „_y 70 A113 DO 7 -,,) p �51NN .._ L001 00 F-0 IT �P 1 m PARKING LEGEND COUNT PUBLIC PARKING SPACES (P) 400 PRIVATE CONDO SPACES (PC) 32 TEL & VALET PARKING 321 TOTAL PARKING 753 w O 180] 6 0 , RUMBLE RI S PAINTED il 0 BAR CROSSWALK PLAN I CONCESSION MF so, R�21 I I I 29-PC I 9 c ;3b I I 1 1! 11 ;1 Iftaf 44 LUGGAGE 30-PC 8-PC 1 37 1 11 1: 3 i a STORAGE VA I Tg�ET i i � C� � 4 t 3: i E� I — 111-1-11 1-111,11- - - 1 1--- -1,- 1-1, -- 1 0 11:1 H TO AGE. _TOMEN4DE z V� 0 F -4, it I N Or i EXIS TLVG RE TAIL 158,_4„ 82-8" 241' -0„ a 0 9 Addendum No 1 01/18/0 ,'-encl N o 2 01/23/07 7 Add worowslIllillil♦li M 2450 d1w # 06-037 M