The URL can be used to link to this page

FLD2008-03007Clearwater Planning Department 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, Florida 33756 Telephone: 727 - 562 -4567 Fax: 727 - 562 -4865 ❑ SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION ❑ SUBMIT 14 COPIES OF T,HE ORIGINAL APPLICATION - Plans and application are required to be collated, stapled, and folded into sets ❑ SUBMIT FIRE PRELIMARY SITE PLAN: $200.00 ❑ SUBMIT APPLICATION FEE $ CASE #: RECEIVED BY (staff initials): _ DATE RECEIVED: CRAWAL RECEENW ��t�lv ;.f a 2 20�p08 EN CIN 1 Ed" m„ * NOTE: 15 TOTAL SETS OF INFORMATION REQUIRED (APPLICATIONS PLUS SITE PLAN SETS) FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project (Revised 04/24/2007) PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT— A. APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4- 202.A) APPLICANT NAME: MAILING ADDRESS: AV 1Z ID PHONE NUMBER: 19a 1� - 1 FAX NUMBER: CELL NUMBER EMAIL: PROPERTY OWNER(S): / !_ L G - a� e. L{, List ALL owners on the deed C_ AGENT NAME: MAILING ADDRESS: PHONE NUMBER: .� �q� - - -ftj FAX NUMBER: / B CELL NUMBER: EMAIL: e/� B. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4- 202.A) PROJECT NAME: j�'� 2� 5 I. f S 0 VX_ PROJECT VALUATION: $ L STREET ADDRESS t SOtn PARCEL NUMBER(S): ( a 010 C> LrC`-O / a 07-ry PARCEL SIZE (acres): •q� _ PARCEL SIZE (square feet): CAL. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: wo ir./s iG PROPOSED USE(S): DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST: �di 4- f�/ Specifically identify the request Cool �T OG a C (include number of units or square footage of non - residential use and all c L It 4, K requested code deviations; e.g. reduction in required number of parking spaces, specific use, etc.) t_i v� C: \Documents and Settings \derek.ferguson\ Desktop \planningforms_0707 \Comprehensive Infill Project (FLD) 04- 24- 07.doc Page 1 of 8 v 0 L&-W� n 0 DOES THIS APPLICATION INVOLVE THE TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS (TDR), A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED PLANNED UNI DEVELOPMENT, OR A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED (CERTIFIED) SITE PLAN? YES _ NO _✓ (if yes, attach a copy of the applicable documents) C. PROOF OF OWNERSHIP: (Code Section 4- 202.A.5) ❑ SUBMIT A COPY OF THE TITLE INSURANCE POLICY, DEED TO THE PROPERTY OR SIGN AFFIDAVIT ATTESTING OWNERSHIP (see page 7) D. ❑ 1. WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 3- 913.A) Provide complete responses to the six (6) GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA — Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail: The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. k 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use. tt 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. �t 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. U 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts, on adjacent properties. It• ORONAL RECRAD O'2 2008 e 0sr�t1a17kO!+PhF � 4a,l ; a�Q'r;' h�aV�l Ei:R C: \Documents and Settings \derek .ferguson \Desktop\planningforms -0707 \Comprehensive Infill Project (FLD) 04- 24- 07.doc Page 2 of 8 E-1 0 D. WRITTEN SUBMITTAL EQUIREMENTS (Code Section 3 -913A) General applicability Criteria. 1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. The proposed site has an existing building of which no building additions will be proposed and therefore the scale, coverage and density of the site will not change. 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. The property is surrounded by commercial developments. The proposed development will be office space which is consistent with commercial nature of the surrounding area. 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use. The proposed development will reduce the number of driveways from the existing two entrances down to one entrance. This is a safety improvement to pedestrians and motorists since the right hand lane is merging at this location. The improvement of the site will also remove hazardous areas in the abandoned parking facility, and will also discourage children from playing in an abandoned, easily accessible building. 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. The parking area is designed with adequate depth to allow cars access without backing up traffic on Ft. Harrison Ave. Also the proposed development will reduce the number of driveways from the existing two entrances down to one entrance. This is a safety improvement to pedestrians and motorists since the right hand lane is merging at this location. 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. Medical and Office type buildings appear in the immediate vicinity. This office space is consistent with the surrounding area as the use is the same. 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effect, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts, or adjacent properties. The proposed development will increase the visual effects by improving an abandoned building with new paint and exterior trimming. QMMAL RECEIAED (A,1�.{`.�i +j� ',.�y(�5j/�/.0 2y�. 20100] {per WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project Criteria) ❑ Provide complete responses to the six (6) COMPREHENSIVE INFILL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT CRITERIA — Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail: 1. The development or redevelopment is otherwise impractical without deviations from the use and /or development standards set forth in this zoning district. jf 2. The development or redevelopment will be consistent with the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan, as well as with the general purpose, intent and basic planning objectives of this Code, and with the intent and purpose of this zoning district I 3. The development or redevelopment will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of surrounding properties. v 4. Adjoining properties will not suffer substantial detriment as a result of the proposed development. �l 5. The proposed use shall otherwise be permitted by the underlying future land use category, be compatible with adjacent land uses, will not substantially alter the essential use characteristics of the neighborhood; and shall demonstrate compliance with one or more of the following objectives: a. The proposed use is permitted in this zoning district as a minimum standard, flexible standard or flexible development use; b. The proposed use would be a significant economic contributor to the City's economic base by diversifying the local economy or by creating jobs; c. The development proposal accommodates the expansion or redevelopment of an existing economic contributor; d. The proposed use provides for the provision of affordable housing; e. The proposed use provides for development or redevelopment in an area that is characterized by other similar development and where a land use plan amendment and rezoning would result in a spot land use or zoning designation; or f. The proposed use provides for the development of a new and /or preservation of a working waterfront use. 6. Flexibility with regard to use, lot width, required setbacks, height and off - street parking are justified based on demonstrated compliance with all of the following design objectives: a. The proposed development will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of the surrounding properties for uses permitted in this zoning district; b. The proposed development complies with applicable design guidelines adopted by the City; c. The design, scale and intensity of the proposed development supports the established or emerging character of an area; d. In order to form a cohesive, visually interesting and attractive appearance, the proposed development incorporates a substantial number of the following design elements: ❑ Changes in horizontal building planes; ❑ Use of architectural details such as columns, cornices, stringcourses, pilasters, porticos, balconies, railings, awnings, etc.; ❑ Variety in materials, colors and textures; ❑ Distinctive fenestration patterns; ❑ Building stepbacks; and ❑ Distinctive roofs forms. e. The proposed development provides for appropriate buffers, enhanced landscape design and appropriate distances between buildings. c1 CREW REM o2 mom C: \Documents and Settings\derek.ferguson\ Desktop \planningforms _0707 \Comprehensive Infill ProjVVOIP0F 24-f�7 RTe��f } JT Page 3 of 8 �-` Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Criteria 1. The development or redevelopment is otherwise impractical without deviations from the use and /or development standards set forth in this zoning district. The building is existing and it is impossible to reduce the setbacks to the side and front property lines without demolishing the building. 2. Te development and redevelopment will be consistent with the goals and policies of the comprehensive plan, as well as the general purpose, intent and basic planning objectives of this code, and with the intent and purpose of the zoning district. The goal of the comprehensive plan is to discourage the decaying of property in the city. The development of this property would increase the tax base and improve a decaying building. 3. The development or redevelopment will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of surrounding properties. The development will consist of commercial office use. This is consistent with surrounding uses. The scale of the building is consistent with the use to the south, north and west, where the buildings all appear to be about the same size. 4. The adjoining properties will not suffer substantial detriment as a result of the proposed development. The proposed development is to a scale which will not exceed the use of the site. Adjoining properties would benefit from this development by improvement and occupation of a vacant building, the creation of aesthetically pleasing landscaping and also the construction of a parking lot. 5. The proposed use shall otherwise be permitted by the underlying future land use category, be compatible with adjacent land uses, will not substantially alter the essential use characteristics of the neighborhood; and shall demonstrate compliance with one or more of the following objectives (please see application form for objectives) a) The proposed development is for medical office use. This use is consistent with surrounding properties to the north and east of the site. b) As the use is consistent with the surrounding neighbors, the essential characteristics of the neighborhood will not be altered. c) The development of offices where the building is currently vacant will produce taxable revenue to the City. O RRaNto rL"CEIV D v2 2000 cI r.:.; 0 -11f 6. Flexibility with regard to use, lot width, required setbacks, height and off - street parking are justified based on demonstrated compliance with all of the following design objectives: a) The proposed use is consistent with the use of surrounding properties, that being commercial in nature with medical /office facilities. b) The proposed development will comply with the required design guidelines by providing the required parking, drainage facilities, and landscaping as required by city code. No variances or waivers are asked for in this regard. c) The design and scale is consistent with surrounding uses. The building will not be significantly larger than any neighbors. Also as the building is existing. d) As the building is existing: There will be no change in horizontal building planes The use of awnings will increase the aesthetics of the building. There will be three different colors to the fagade Light windows will provide fenestration patterns There will be no building stepbacks as the building is existing There will be no distinctive roofforms as the existing roof will be utilized e) The proposed development will provide enhanced landscape buffers where none previously existed. or RIM A r�l';�5t 0 2 2008 0 • E. STORMWATER PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteria Manual and 4- 202.A.21) A STORMWATER NARRATIVE MUST BE SUBMITTED WITH ALL APPLICATIONS. All applications that involve addition or modification of impervious surface, including buildings, must include a stormwater plan that demonstrates compliance with the City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteria manual. A reduction in impervious surface area does not qualify as an exemption to this requirement ❑ If a plan is not required, the narrative shall provide an explanation as to why the site is exempt. //// 2' At a minimum, the STORMWATER PLAN shall include the following; Existing topography extending 50 feet beyond all property lines; Proposed grading including finished floor elevations of all structures; All adjacent streets and municipal storm systems; Proposed stormwater detention /retention area including top of bank, toe of slope and outlet control structure; Q/ A narrative describing the proposed stormwater control plan including all calculations and data necessary to demonstrate compliance with / the City manual. Gr , Proposed stormwater detention /retention area including top of bank, toe of slope and outlet control structure; C�?/ Signature and seal of Florida Registered Professional Engineer on all plans and calculations. COPY OF PERMIT INQUIRY LETTER OR SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT (SWFWMD) PERMIT SUBMITTAL (SWFWMD approval is required prior to issuance of City Building Permit), if applicable O ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF STORMWATER PLAN REQUIREMENTS (Applicant must initial one of the following): Stormwater plan as noted above is included Stormwater plan is not required and explanation narrative is attached. At a minimum, a grading plan and finished floor elevations shall be provided. CAUTION — IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A STORMWATER PLAN AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 562-4750. F. SUPPLEMENTAL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 4- 202.A) ID/ SIGNED AND SEALED SURVEY (including legal description of property) — One original and 14 copies; D" TREE SURVEY (including existing trees on site and within 25' of the adjacent site, by species, size (DBH 4" or greater), and location, including drip lines and indicating trees to be removed) — please design around the existing trees; 21/ TREE INVENTORY; prepared by a "certified arborist ", of all trees 4" DBH or greater, reflecting size, canopy (drip lines) and condition of / such trees; ® LOCATION MAP OF THE PROPERTY; ❑ PARKING DEMAND STUDY in conjunction with a request to make deviations to the parking standards (ie. Reduce number of spaces). Prior to the submittal of this application, the methodology of such study shall be approved by the Community Development Coordinator and shall be in accordance with accepted traffic engineering principles. The findings of the study will be used in determining whether or not / deviations to the parking standards are approved; ® GRADING PLAN, as applicable; ❑ PRELIMINARY PLAT, as required (Note: Building permits will not be issued until evidence of recording a final plat is provided); ❑ COPY OF RECORDED PLAT, as applicable; Q 2 2000 C: \Documents and Settings \derek.ferguson\ Desktop\ planningforms _0707\Comprehensive Infill Project (� 64- 24�0T.c7.o 'owrr t „� phi {� Page 4of8.tnYt;w•,_a�.d 0 G. SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4- 202.A) 0 SITE PLAN with the following information (not to exceed 24" x 36 "): ./ Index sheet referencing individual sheets included in package; ✓ North arrow; tl/ Engineering bar scale (minimum scale one inch equals 50 feet), and date prepared; All dimensions; t/ Footprint and size of all EXISTING buildings and structures; LX Footprint and size of all PROPOSED buildings and structures; All required setbacks; ✓ All existing and proposed points of access; All required sight triangles; Identification of environmentally unique areas, such as watercourses, wetlands, tree masses, and specimen trees, including ✓/ description and location of understory, ground cover vegetation and wildlife habitats, etc; Location of all public and private easements; V Location of all street rights -of -way within and adjacent to the site; Location of existing public and private utilities, including fire hydrants, storm and sanitary sewer lines, manholes and lift stations, gas (/ and water lines; �1AlI parking spaces, driveways, loading areas and vehicular use areas; c/ Depiction by shading or crosshatching of all required parking lot interior landscaped areas; Location of all solid waste containers, recycling or trash handling areas and outside mechanical equipment and all required screening ✓ (per Section 3- 201(D)(i) and Index #701); _ Location of all landscape material; ✓ / Location of all onsite and offsite storm -water management facilities; 4'•, Location of all outdoor lighting fixtures; and ./ Location of all existing and proposed sidewalks. I] SITE DATA TABLE for existing, required, and proposed development, in written /tabular form: Land area in square feet and acres; Number of EXISTING dwelling units; Number of PROPOSED dwelling units; Gross floor area devoted to each use; / Parking spaces: total number, presented in tabular form with the number of required spaces; Total paved area, including all paved parking spaces & driveways, expressed in square feet & percentage of the paved vehicular area; / Official records book and page numbers of all existing utility easement; Building and structure heights; permeable surface ratio (I.S.R.); and Floor area ratio (F.A.R.) for all nonresidential uses. REDUCED COLOR SITE PLAN to scale (8' /z X 11); EXISTING REQUIRED PROPOSED —0A . 26 �otN/ ,�; r7tIDSF b.R6 � I � l 1 A -6 Q- I x 1 (> r,A) O FOR DEVELOPMENTS OVER ONE ACRE, provide the following additional information on site plan: One -foot contours or spot elevations on site; Offsite elevations if required to evaluate the proposed stormwater management for the parcel; All open space areas; Location of all earth or water retaining walls and earth berms; Lot lines and building lines (dimensioned); Streets and drives (dimensioned); Building and structural setbacks (dimensioned); Structural overhangs; r C: \Documents and Settings \derek.ferguson\ Desktop\ planningforms _0707\Comprehensive Infill Project (FLD)`04=24 =Q7.d6 , �'"��_ ' �` 4 Page 5 of 8 CTYOF OF py. -,;. ",.b °k. H. LANDSCAPING PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4- 1102.A) ❑ LANDSCAPE PLAN with the following information (not to exceed 24"x 36 "): All existing and proposed structures; Names of abutting streets; t/ Drainage and retention areas including swales, side slopes and bottom elevations; ✓ Delineation and dimensions of all required perimeter landscape buffers; Sight visibility triangles; Delineation and dimensions of all parking areas including landscaping islands and curbing; / Existing trees on -site and immediately adjacent to the site, by species, size and locations, including driplines (as indicated on required r✓ tree survey); ,Location, size, and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, indicated by a key relating to the plant ✓ schedule; Plant schedule with a key (symbol or label) indicating the size, description, specifications, quantities, and spacing requirements of all ✓existing and proposed landscape materials, including botanical and common names; �ypical planting details for trees, palms, shrubs and ground cover plants including instructions, soil mixes, backfilling, mulching and protective measures; /interior landscaping areas hatched and /or shaded and labeled and interior landscape coverage, expressing in both square feet and V percentage covered; conditions of a previous development approval (e.g. conditions imposed by the Community Development Board); Irrigation notes. REDUCED COLOR LANDSCAPE PLAN to scale (8 Yz X 11); ❑ COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM application, as applicable. Landscape associated with the Comprehensive Landscape Program shall exceed minimum Code requirements to offset the areas where minimum Code will not be met. I. BUILDING ELEVATION PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4- 202.A.23) ❑ BUILDING ELEVATION DRAWINGS — with the following information; All sides of all buildings; Dimensioned; Colors (provide one full sized set of colored elevations); Materials; Sight visibility triangles; ❑ REDUCED BUILDING ELEVATIONS — same as above to scale on 8 Yz X 11. J. SIGNAGE: (Division 19. SIGNS / Section 3 -1806) ,(gyp 617"r f ed ❑ All EXISTING freestanding and attached signs; Provide photographs and dimensions (area, height, etc.), indicate whether they will be removed or to remain. ❑ All PROPOSED freestanding and attached signs; Provide details including location, size, height, colors, materials and drawing; freestanding signs shall include the street address (numerals) ❑ Comprehensive Sign Program application, as applicable (separate application and fee required). ❑ Reduced signage proposal (8 Yz X 11) (color), if submitting Comprehensive Sign Program application. C: \Documents and Setting s\derek.ferguson\Desktop\planningforms-0707\Com preh ensive Infill Projec'Y PF�LD)�412 X04 floc Page 6 of 8 C bf0I C t�.,d` ..:6; K. TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY: (Section 4- 202.A.13 and 4- 801.C) A.90 1-1cc, O Include if required by the Traffic Operations Manager or his /her designee or if the proposed development: ■ Will degrade the acceptable level of service for any roadway as adopted in the Comprehensive Plan. • Will generate 100 or more new vehicle directional trips per hour and /or 1000 or more new vehicle trips per day. • Will affect a nearby roadway segment and /or intersection with five (5) reportable accidents within the prior twelve (12) month period or that is on the City's annual list of most hazardous intersections. Trip generation shall be based on the most recent edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineer's (ITE) Trip General Manual. The Traffic Impact Study must be prepared in accordance with a " Scoping Meeting" held with the Traffic Operations Manager and the Planning Department's Development Review Manager or their designee (727 - 562 -4750) Refer to Section 4 -801 C of the Community Development Code for exceptions to this requirement. tf Acknowledgement of traffic impact study requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following): Traffic Impact Study is included. The study must include a summary table of pre- and post - development levels of service for all roadway legs and each turning movement at all intersections identified in the Scoping Meeting. Traffic Impact Study is not required. CAUTION — IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 562- 4750. L. FIRE FLOW CALCULATIONS/ WATER STUDY: / &Y& f Provide Fire Flow Calculations. Water Study by a FIRE PROTECTION ENGINEER to assure an adequate water supply is available and to determine if any upgrades are required by the developer due to the impact of this project. The water supply must be able to support the needs of any required fire sprinkler, standpipe and /or fire pump. If a fire pump is required the water supply must be able to supply 150% of its rated capacity. Compliance with the 2004 Florida Fire Prevention Code to include NFPA 13, MFPA 14, NFPA 20, NFPA 291, and MFPA 1142 (Annex H) is required. Z Acknowledgement of fire flow calculations/water study requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following): Fire Flow Calculations/Water Study is included. Fire Flow Calculations/Water Study is not required. CAUTION — IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A FIRE FLOW CALCULATIONS/ WATER STUDY AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Fire Prevention Department at (727) 5624334. M. SIGNATURE: I, the undersigned, acknowledge that all representations made in this application are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge and authorize City representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application. Signature`6f property owner or representative STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS S om to and subscribed before me this day of A.D. 20 to me and /or by r' who is personally known has as My)cQr;fmission expires: NOTARY PUBLIC-STATE OF # DD54375 R. 24. 201 C: \Documents and Settings\ derek. ferguson \Desktop\planningforms_0707 \Comprehensive Infill Project (FLD) 04- 24- 07.doc Page 7 of 8 02 2008 • • N. AFFIDAVIT TO AUTHORIZE AGENT: 1. Provide names of all property owners on deed — PRINT full names: 2. That (I am/we are) the owner(s) and record title holder(s) of the following described property (address or general location): 3. That this property constitutes the property for which a request for a: (describe request) 4. That the undersigned (has/have) appointed and (does /do) appoint: t yte4u t ✓�, LL L as (his /their) agent(s) to execute any petitions or other ocuments necessary to affect such petiti n; 5. That this affidavit has been executed to induce the City of Clearwater, Florida to consider and act on the above described property; 6. That site visits to the property are necessary by City representatives in order to process this application and the owner authorizes City representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application; 7. That (I/we), the undersigne authority, hereby rtify that the foregoing is true and correct. �s 3 L L C operty Owner Property Owner Property Owner Property Owner STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS Before me the undersigned, an officer duly commissioned by the laws of the State of Florida, on this 1' day of personally appeared jk\/oC who having been first duly sworn Deposes and says that he /she fully understands the contents of the affidavit that he /she signed. NOTARY PUBLIC -STATE OF FLORIDA Kimberly R. Parmelee Commission # DD543750 Expires: APR. 24, 2010 Notary Public Signature Bonded Thru Atlantic B;-rciing Co., Inc. Notary Seal /Stamp My Commission Expires: L{ Io 0R =1h, iflt Iaq44iam. .; o2 2000 C: \Documents and Settings \derek.ferguson\ Desktop \planningforms_0707 \Comprehensive Infill P{oject (, raj; 04- 24- G?,doryn Page 8 of 8 4 IAN, ! rt+ t''-'v f�a4 M a VIENT A BOUNDARY SURVEY OF (0. R. BOOK 141 1 5, PAGE 2048) THAT PART OF THE WEST 1/2 OF THE SE 1/4 OF THE SE 1/4 OF SECTION 21, TOWNSHIP 29 SOUTH, RANGE 15 EAST, PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE SE CORNER OF THE NORTH 756.05 FEET OF SAID WEST 1/2 OF SE 1/4 OF SE 1/4 AND RUNNING THENCE SOUTH 0 °8'42" WEST ALONG THE EAST BOUNDARY OF SAID WEST 1/2 OF SE 1/4 140 FEET, THENCE SOUTH 74'12'9" WEST, 155.86 FEET TO THE NORTHEASTERLY RIGHT - OF -WAY BOUNDARY OF COUNTY HIGHWAY #1 (ALSO HAVING BEEN ORIGINALLY KNOWN AS STATE ROAD 15), THENCE NORTH 32-36'18" WEST ALONG SAID RIGHT - OF -WAY BOUNDARY 280 FEET, THENCE SOUTH 79'56'18" EAST 305.9 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. 0 i 9 'r"•�2 4A M 2� q 0 ma r. 14. 1VVO 11:Vy„m to a[irai[u kovwainvkp iivn ino HU.'tLI r• ) Page 2 oM3 SIGNED SEALED IN OUR PRESEN( Witness ail: Witness #2: DELIVERED BEI Lim By: ida 7WL STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF PMELLAS The foregoing inst n n ant was acknowledged before me this i day of _ MCCH 2008 by ANGELO MARKOPOULOS, as Manager of BELLEAIR POINT INVESTMENTS, LLC, a Florida Limited Liability Company, who produced ma t t, f d &. as identification. Notary Public My conanission expires: AWL EXPM tY, tIAIt eanea the MEeA► P� uee�""`" s� 02 2008 C'sT- X,Uv1INT niar. 19. LUDO II:vynnl [u acirnicu %jvmainvviivn ino NU, UI) F. It 0 3 of 3 Wi e s #2: STATE OF FLORIDA 0 BELLEAM POINT INVES , a Florida Limited Liabili arty By: Thomas Goebel, as Manager ADDRESS: COUN'T'Y OF FINELLAS The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 2008 by THOMAS GOEBEL, as Manager of B • POINT INVESTMENTS, LLC, a Florida Limited Liability Company, who produced V i V as identification. Notary Pu My commission expires: �. M`( GOMMl9S1ON S DO 49M '� EXPIRES: Maid+ 15, 3010 �eee 1TN Napo, vmio u,dxw�i w.'11, WL RU A ;F 02, ^�2+008 t�f PIAtNN°ak�G 0 .,R&�R WENT Mar. 14. luuu I I:wivi to atirKitu tM)I 111UR Ins, no. gLIi r. t • i Document Prepared by 8t return to: KENNETH G. ARSENAULT, JR. TITLE AGENCY OF FLORIDA, INC. 19535 GULF BLVD., SUITE C INDIAN SHORES, FL 33785 Parcel # 21/29/15/00000/440 /2000 File # 08 -8052 WARRANTY DEED THIS INDENTURE, made this day of PA grow , 2008 between BELLEAIR POINT INVESTMENTS, LLC, a Florida Limited Liability Company, hereinafter called the Grantor, to 1573, L.L.C., a Florida Limited Liability Company, hereinafter called the Grantee, having the principal address of _ WITNESSETH: That the Grantor, for and in consideration of the sum of Ten Dollars ($10.00), and other good and valuable considerations, the receipt and sufficiency. of which is hereby acknowledged, by these presents does grant, bargain, sell, alien, remise, release, enforce, convey and confirm unto the Grantee, all that certain parcel of land lying and being in the County of Pinellas, State of FLORIDA, more particularly described as Mows:- SEE EXHIBIT "A" ATTACHED HEIMTO AND MADE A PART HEREOF SUBJECT TO TAXES FOR THE YEAR 2008 AND SUBSEQUENT YEARS SUBJECT TO RESTRICTIONS AND EASEMENTS OF RECORD. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the some in fee simple forever. and the Grantor hereby covenants with said Grantee that he is lawfully seized. of said land in fee simple; that he has good right and lawful authority to sell and convey said land; that he hereby fully warrants the title to said land and will defend the same against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever; and that said land is free of all encumbrances. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Grantor has hereunto set Grantors' hands and seals the day and year first above- written. Page 1 of 3 C,' . !SE qz,. ri7�Y- i F CEO ;� i Clearwater �J Planning Department 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, Florida 33756 Telephone: 727 -562 -4567 Fax: 727 - 562 -4865 ❑ SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION ❑ SUBMIT 14 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION -Plans and application are required to be collated, stapled and folded into sets 0 CASE NUMBER: RECEIVED BY (Staff Initials): DATE RECEIVED: * NOTE: A TOTAL OF 15 SETS OF THIS APPLICATION AND ALL SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION IS REQUIRED TO BE SUBMITTED IN CONJUNCTION WITH A COMPLETE LEVEL ONE OR LEVEL TWO APPLICATION. COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM (Revised 04/24/2007) PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT— APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4- 202.A) APPLICANT NAME: IfLeA MAILING ADDRESS: tkA PHONE NUMBER: jq:3 — S 7 33 FAX NUMBER: CELL NUMBER: EMAIL: PROPERTY OWNER(S): L(—(- List ALL owners on the deed AGENT NAME: -C.3 MAILING ADDRESS: t 6c> 1. IV [ . PHONE NUMBER: '� 'fit �c�p _c� FAX NUMBER:_( TO`mss 8 CELL NUMBER: _ EMAIL: /eJ+�✓ e± MX.1)Gr_ bf / C,L)lI 60,jA /14. 1. ARCHITECTURAL THEME: a. The landscaping in a Comprehensive Landscape Program shall be designed as a part of the architectural theme of the principal buildings proposed or developed on the parcel proposed for the development. A. _ OR b. The design, character, location and /or materials of the landscape treatment proposed in the Comprehensive Landscape Program shall be demonstrably more attractive than landscaping otherwise permitted on the parcel proposed for development under the minimum landscape standards. ise_ .3�F C:1Documents and Settingslderek .fergusonlDesktoplplanningforms 07071Comprehensive Landscape 'rogra 04 -`?4 =0 docJa 35� Page 1 of 2 . ror/L , 10 0 2. COMMUNITY CHARACTER: The landscape treatment proposed in the Comprehensive Landscape Program will enhance the community character of the City of n ,_ I _ _. - r I n . 3. PROPERTY VALUES: The landscape treatment proposed in the Comprehensive Landscape Program will have a beneficial impact on the value of the property in the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. cu& CL &Aqj 511-(- v a-c e tAJ l C)0 W N �Au(f— a— Dbst I Gc-. ' I I .I 4. SPECIAL AREA OR SCENIC CORRIDOR PLAN: The landscape treatment proposed in the Comprehensive Landscape Program is consistent with any special area or scenic corridor plan which thel City of Clearwater has prepared and adopted for the area in which the parcel proposed for development is located. Q (S t y� C CJ C�49 % ..� .. r ,. I . _ .n it , e L .. _ _ '<M. ,T] . _ tY-. l n �. 1 � ,.� w n THE LANDSCAPING REQUIREMENTS OF ARTICLE 3, DIVISION 12 MAY BE WAIVED OR MODIFIED AS A PART OF A LEVEL ONE OR LEVEL TWO APPLICATION, AS THE CASE MAY BE, IF THE APPLICATION FOR DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL INCLUDES A COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM, WHICH SATISFIES THE ABOVE CRITERIA. THE USE OF LANDSCAPE PLANS, SECTIONS / ELEVATIONS, RENDERINGS AND PERSPECTIVES MAY BE NECESSARY TO SUPPLEMENT THE INFORMATION PROVIDED ON THIS WORKSHEET. SIGNATURE: I, the undersigned, acknowledge that all representations made in this application are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge and authorize City representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application. Si nature of property owner or representative STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELI�AS Sworn to and subscribed before me this IL4* day of A.D. 200 to me and /or by Cx who is personally known has produced � as identification. DA Kimberly R. Parmelee N94aj public, Expires: APR. 24, 2010 M mmission expires: Bonded Thru Atlap4c E,�nding Co., Inc. op';r, ();? 00 C:1Documents and Settingslderek. fergusonlD esktoplplanningforms _07071Comprehensive Landscape Program 04- 24- 07.doc Page 2 of 2 092008 10011 ; , 1573 FORT HARRISON OFFICE COMPREHENSIVE INFILL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT 1573 S. Fort Harrison Ave. RITF IIATA U - J -j CLL�j W LU y W — C7Va� WN w J as > a) U dviN Gon a� 3 f I UJ U LL LL O z w . O y lY ¢r OE wf Q O = U 1— CE O U- M Ln C -1 P "��ry' "� Clearwater, Florida 33756 PARCEL NUMBER 21/MI51(WDGj44Q/2000 TOTAL PROJECT AREA: 0.88 ACHES (42.000 S.F.) ZONING: SECTION 21, TOWNSHIP 29 SOUTH, RANGE 15 EAST c LANMERCW FUTURE LAND USE 6 G CG- COMM EflCIAL GENERAL - � 6 EgSTING USE ii WAREHOUSE (VACANT) SHEET INDEX 441 PROPOSED USE �� I —d ~; PROFESSIONAL OFFICE AND MEDICAL CUNICS G1 COVER SHEET 7-11 --- G2 GENERAL NOTES AND SPECIFICATIONS S w. emLaaG NEIGNr: EXISTING: G HEI 25 FEET C3 SITE PLAN - IIii JJ �• ! ., PROMSE0:2633 FEET C-4 PAVING ,GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN FLOOD ZONIf. G5 UTILITY PLAN i # :3 roY...r y ww r' ".. FEMA PANEL 121030010811 C-6 LANDSCAPE PLAN DATED MaY 11, zDOs G7 DETAIL SHEET .., { 1 I ! zoNEx C-8 DETAIL SHEET �. '4 II ...- —,. STRUCTURE DETAIL SHEET �^ ' � t REQUIRED PROPOSED G10 DETAIL SHEET A` j 1 E ""� 3 FRONT (FT HAAIiISdI AVE) 25 Fr. FRONT (FT HAPRISOH AYE) 25 FT. 19.6 FT. (EXIST. BUILDING) 15 FT. (PROP. PAVEMENT) $ SURVEY // i y; �• PEM (EAST 20 FT. 10 PT. (PROP. PAVEMENT) (. 1 I I ,fti 1 I SEAR (NORTH) 20 FT. M. FT. (PROP. PAVEMENT) \ I !� SIDE (6011TH) 10 FT. SIDE 5 FT. (EXIST. SIILDING) (SOUTH) 10 FT. 10 FT. (PROP. PAVEMENT) 1 I { • PROPOSED BUILDINCr. 10.859SOUAREFEETTOTAL(2 STORY) �'°• °•' ;r Ii 7 7. 1e FLOOR =5,570 S.F. d 1F F � 2M FLOOR =5,259 S.F. Location Map RL°° Tf AREA°' PROPOSED: 0.26 PROFESSIONAL TEAMS UB ARA RAlO MPERVOSAR EA aO PROPOSED: 0.54 CIVIL ENGINEER SURVEYOR PARIUNG; Howard Civil Engineering, LLC John Brendle & Associates, III C.. REQUIRED: 1601 3rd Street S. - Suite A 8015 82nd Avenue North 4 SPACES PER I= SF = 8 SPACES (1e3S9/I=% =43.4) St. Petersburg, FL 33701 Pinellas Park, FL. 33781 PROPOSED: M SPACES Offfice (727) 49D -1784 Office (727) 576-7546 INCLUDES 2 HANDICAP SPACES Fax (727) 49D -1787 Fax (727) 577 -9932 E)OSTINGAREP BREAImOwH: MEA (S.F.) 4 OF SITE ARCHITECT VEHICLE USE AREA 0 0.04 Fraze Design OPEN LDING SPACE 95,832 85.91 Contact: Frank Fraze, AIA SIDEWALK /CONCRETE 373 0_94 1750 Central AVG US TOTAL COVERAGE 42,000 100.0% St. Petersburg, FL. 33712 PROPOSED AREA eREAKOOwN: Office(727)- 328,'908 AREA (S.F.) % SITE Fa%(727) 328'3609 VEHICLE USE MEA 14,696 BUILDING 8,203 95.0% 14.8% STOSNIAIER PONDS 2,998 7.1% .1 OPEN GREEN SPACE 16,458 39.2% SIDEWALK 1_,643 3_S4 s_ t TOTAL COVERAGE 42,000 s re DArA m12 r..:.+na.+W.4..a Promw 4�+4...n4u,neeum am 100.0% PWGR9HGO"G Aerial Map - BEFORE YOU DIG CALL SUNSHINE STATE ONE I�W71 @I: YM1ei°"01PO"°�41°I" — 4W,u2rt.PeR+Y4Fm,MriamMHn �•'� eAn3F CALL OF 1�iio 1573 L.L.C. °..::ate 6985 1 st Avenue North -- M- .W.F St. Petersburg, Florida 33710 ��Vvmwc m�ivoMO.a .o.�'an�'ro __._-- _- --- .�_-•__ -_- (727) 347 -3333 .. _ rm ..mffwnlw..p..u",w w-. Ota U - J -j CLL�j W LU y W — C7Va� WN w J as > a) U dviN Gon a� 3 f I UJ U LL LL O z w . O y lY ¢r OE wf Q O = U 1— CE O U- M Ln C -1 GENERAL CONSTRUCTION NOTES t Of m09TFlO Udfq ®.5]PUCnaE9, N1D 011iER Fw11B�5 APE SHOwH ACCOPDINGro BBOPoAATONAVARA&E ATMf 1181E OF PRE- PAM110N Of EHESE RNIS THE WNMAGTdi3HN1VD11fYME ID-EER REVAt10NS, AND DME910% 6 kL E9TING Uf Rf iIEB. SiMCRmE9 Nro OTHER FEA1 URF9 KFECRND 11x3 wMK PROR m Oorlsl W LTlat 2 COHIPACTdiSHNl atECK 0.AAH A1TOFE]D ComOKKm FORCONfDC18AND dswEPAHaES PwaRromNeMLCTIaN. MECONrnncroRSHAUwnw ME OA4e:Ra ENOMEFA DF ANY L'OrkrlCf BEFORE PERFORM INO AP NpiK Ix THE AFi£C1ED IRF.A a ABOVf OP BELOW PIWND,TUT MA�06tIRMNPam� UONA1HEwIXw FGEPFONMEO BY TPCWIMCTAL 5 ME CONiRACmR6 RE 4 O 0EMEiNYm BEWME fkelNRNTM THEPERAIRNID MBPECIIN R6NmFI80FM REPAEVAPgU9 (CVEPNMEPKAGENOFB.ME camucroR 6HNL oBTNN ALL NEPE%ARY PEPIrt6 aRroP ro caaTRlcT roN. Nm soUE IxsFECrmra ADmPO3ro ro NsfNw uA4rwtcrlarl. s aFNwr1IXA9 ANOOOal MENMIEFEPPEproSMKLeEOFUT %TNEn��N9 '"�IaoRM�ED sH.0 mLIPLY W,MMEREDLnA,Nm9 ANBeRdNANCT.,aFME a VANWB OOYflWMEMKADENPFe wVR1O .AINSDICDW OVERMEwOPK OFGNONm LWOSCAANG >. CONIPAC1dL8ttN19U&ARF- ITEWT0KI 1Ef5 ENGP¢EH 9NOPdNWnKL aI Au DRESSY .wD MNFUFAPURED nE9 TD eE IsED oN M5 sRE. FARURE ro osrAU+ OPE wBTALLATNw MAT RESLAT MPFMwk N&REPWILENI AT CONTRACmRSE -E. EINMEERBAPPROVk OFASHOPDMWIxGDOESN l-EVE COMRKTORB RE6PONBIBIUR FCR PFAWMINFCEOFME REM. a. wOPKPEP:ORe1EDUNDEP MSCONmrc sHAUnrrtRFAce suooMLYWTH OIHEB WOPKBEING PFAfPiNE00r16f1E B/OIHFA CONiPACTOPS ANp MUN COMPAN35. R /L11V111F5, wNEAE NECE69F31Y WtIH OMfRCOMN.CTLN9AN0 UMRYCOeRAMO3. WTENK SHNL % 6 W DLY TAMPED AND COKPACrEO TO A RPNNESS E01M1 TO S TNTOF MFSORADYLEMroMET11ENC11 ARdA1D RPE9 MSUYiAB WTO AH UH05TURBm LEVEL OFATLEB6T rA�VETHETYW 6 111E PIPE w AAF.AB ro %PAVm. t WllIERAIBA9 MSSHNLBE RBNFOPCEDCONaR1E PNE CU44 a1. WrIH RUBBENG441@T,KBM6. ,a RrsNPAHD RERACEAmrtoE. rLPNVATEAHO Rreuconwfgry ufECrtosrMS wddsH.., eE PESTOPmronearminoNEwkrooPeErrERMAHE91wG OdMnON60F1HAECOMMENpNOCONSIgUC11W WPat IIME%SPECOMNLY IXEIAPIFD BY MEPINFe. ACPnONKCOSTSNTEINLTDExfKrooMEACP51MCtmN ANO ND IXIPACOMPFN9ATION wLLOEkAOWFO. n. aASSTPTWEIBEWING SHNl.eE lLgotAAES4 BmrwTmoTHERwSeoN THE DMWINE �dI BYTHE FNOMEFn. 1 ON ENGB✓ffTl WITH APNOmCOR' OFNLCOMPACRW iE8i3, 49FWNT PEBIATa ANDaranETe rtSULT.9 MEfiOAS FNGWEER 5 rOCEtrtNYTO THE D6WGtFENGI]Q:f.R M WRRmO iHATALLTE4PN0 REPAPEMENT9IM000IFD BYT11E LCP TKIR IFDOnFOP ME BAPROVEAtENBASPEdeREO Puff ENdNEERINO COIt3TMIPmrF DGWat%FP1 MEONSNE HAVf BEEW w9RED. I ANDmRwu ReoProamdNG THE RFOECr Arm WMLtfHaxc caarRUCnaN. Oq COOEORRKi IAIDIAL MDONTt1E RPEro zl. AT IFA4 JFWOBMNO wY3 PRmgro CPB11iULimN itm LONnVGIOR SH4INOTR'T11E FNOINEERANDAPPROPRAM NIFNOFS AMO SUWLY1NE11 WRHNLREDNgED6HOP A NAME,9TARfING DATE,PROhCTEDSCHFDUE. ANDOIIIEP NcaRwnwAS FEOINIEO. APwadIFRFOPMEO mmPm NOTFWNOME ENdNE ENTA WE AGENCY 06FECidiPRESENTMAr BESUB£CT TORDMPIk N4)rIERALtMENr AT THE WIGPILRPS IXPENSE.m wAffASPEdFIC6PEORGTmNS mBERgWDEOro CONMACTORDUWNOBDdN(i RECORD DRAWINGS ME CONIMGFPt 9NNL % PESR)NSIBIE FOP pE W RpMO 060PMAMM M A 6E( G ME N +PRpIrDFUJR WNCUWIENRY MRNCONSIIRICIION RiailF34 VAIMN Two wEE15 Fauamxo F WAL INSFECnw MF wNmncroR aluu suN.aT ors sEr OF REWPD duW 3m ME EMaNEfl10FPECMp . MERNFJ. PECAHDgUWMG3 SNNICOMP�v� t �TLL.dOPOmNOPEPImF.MEMB: eLYMARIamroRECamKTUALCGNSTRLCnoN. OPkw.V [S 9HN3 BHPH ACTUN. LOGTmN OF ALL UdInES. AxO REUIEO AFPdrtENNmES.BmHAeaAEAND BELOwBPamo. kLa+ANOESro PIPING LOGTON INCLUPNO Hdi¢dRK 6 VE RRGLL IOGTOHS OF UnUn %eAPFURIE NIDIFi£ircNCEO ulffncE RaROYEa1Dn3. wt4wtH9 mMUNSOSHON ncnikiNSrALLrDeumaN. Fla maDO�R.DwANOES M�AOE�BYR� RPtDE osvdw�Nt�aEWw AND . A. duWa1GS6W11REVLLY3HOW k1RTNLS NOT OFI OPmINKCONIWCi DMWtx %Ftif CPBMIX:IEDwME RHO. NLEWNMFNr Atm FwxO PELOG� �BECLfARLY BHPM. MANHdf9, HYOMMS. VKV£9.8 vKVE BOIIE45NNL % 3, SHONN ME WfFIMCTOn 6HALLPPOVIDE CERIIFlEp A981ATORAY•1N>9, SgNEO BYAPROFEe61PUL WID SUNEYPI T11EA80RTddwMG 9NALL9NOW RNKOMOES AND LOGTpN36ALLIJIaIIIFS I1KADdHO SANRNn'SEVIEPQENtartaWFM9. WAMA MxF IDC TmN3, 31dW SEWER smucnme InGTmrR;, mAre ElEVnimNa, wvEms, M+D roxD OET RxaImINGTwWBANK Arm BonetDWENBON9 AND ELEVA T01141.PNfNa BTdICfUIE OETNIS IBmLUdNOOtMTE, WFOT PBFICEAAD$1BLrJAGL dMEXSI0N6ANDELFIAlNm91. MECONTIW,TOR RroW DE 1 Ex wRES of ME cERnRED AseLnLT duwwos ro MF SwoRNxoDme BEFORE YOU DIG CALL SUNSHINE STATE ONE CALL OF FLORIDA eo * i o aano STANDARD UTILITY NOTES I. LrFAViF.Rn -1. OF MERdmASTArUlE9 PEWdFS MAT N +ExwvnmRraTlFYki ws VTIUTIE9AMBBMUM Oq lrrowoRGNCwrsPROR rDExwvAnNO. MAPS SMGwolarnlE APRmIOWTE LOGMMVOFO]S MAMSAND W NOTSHOHSDIWCE UNfs. ME ONlY6AfE AND PROPER wATTO UE PERSONNEL MNN9E SERVICEtmFB5BY AN ON91E INSPECTX]N PMERFSPECIA£M9 PEIi30M0EL MEPENPE. E%GVAi0R8 AAF Ra31PUC1EDT0 T EtEPNgE ME RE9PEL1 NF (344 COMPAP T W O LW gNNG wY6 BEEPS ENIERMi A ooNSTTAA:rroNARFA. I ALL UemmGRauxD UmmES MLrsrBEIxPL,LCE,MMDNaauPECn=o AS REPMED PNOq UNF LCON91PUC1E 3 EKIREME CAt1110NINAlE440FBURE3 InILRS SAN D PERMITT M�MNNOA ME LOST WFS OF E9TNOroIwDERGROUNDMIR W TE9W PA ESIN dmER ro I NSIPUCIp I BY 5 ME fN11N00.0R9ASONBNwF STATEONE fMl CEN]ER OF F1AaDA MC AT ]ra coNrRAC oqs RESPONSIBUTrm NoMY suFSHwr FaRnEMMIr I �x�oLns RaoRron.WaPARwo oFwusmucrary ro,aErmv kLUNnrwanos ��roaecaxracr MEFq LpxNO3HOUE -ME- --m- P- NAROMRETMRic8K341 xTERmMFecn a MEIDGTIRYi OFMLE9TNK3« rnTn% sItPWFON MEPLNYS NAVE 9Eet ceTElmNEo cara4crsAHD dswEPN+aESPRaRroauNSTRUCIION. THECdrm.DroxswuNmc T xE DwIO=RS Ex0 W EER OF Aw mYFUCi BEFORE PERFaw.11x0 Nw wwK w ME NTECf E[ SAFELY NOTES t. WRINOMF CJN3IPVGIIdFANOAM etARFIEIFAFtCFOFTla3PPOI ECT, MF CONIMCTOP SNKL COYRY WRH PEGNUn0N8 THE OOIFTMCPOROR 103 W:PPESEIRAINE SHAILBE RESIro1131NE FOP ME WNMOLAHD T:Tra METRAeEwn PUeuc ANO ere sAFtr a rts PE16PPlE1 LAeoP BMETYREdAAMINS SHAUeE ASSET TORN ar osluwME 1an1REP EdnaF GF THE srAre aF � FlgeoA elAralAL Pl IPAfiRC LU111110LAND6NEPMCIICE4 PoBS1TrtETAIm MIGHwAY ANOUTILIPOPERAl10r55NNl %FPLPYEO wn1E DE6mN AwuCAnON, M9TAUATNm. MNNIENNICE ANO REetOVKOFAIITRARm W NtPd. DEW CE9, wAAMNG 0 �. AHD BN W E16 NFCZ•SSAAY ro %pTECF ME PUBIIc u�i. cTR1FRWmRU uaNMwsMwAMi owl U�cGNiR�oL�oE-�WC Se�vAPm SYMEmUS%ME- ENTOFTBN.9VPrAn E TEDEMLIIIWMNYADMINSTdTPM. ME soLE RESgortsdulr of ME mNmncTOR To coMR.r wRH N.o EesoRe,= ,ML.PPLx:1BLE sArE1 r REODUTroxs. T HE a3wE INFOronenoN NAS �w FPO`AOF.0 Fd1ME WPMCI'ON8INFORMATmN ONLYAND 0064 NOTIMPLY TLATME aWNdI OP ENOYffER w0LIN6PECr AUOmPEHFdmE3AfETYPFOl4A1aJN9, PAVING AND GRADING NOTES I RWLaE, Mtxa PEnT.waaEOI -AMBL �IEDOIIDANCE VATH 1ImRSE RNB OB -.-ENE. Shc TESRACOWAP. OEIE1B0d61MTFPM15TO0F 5TOCI6a,ef FAS ABETomI APPPOrEO MAIDNYS AND COTACTED A9 SNOYM PB T HERE P Wl9. 2 COMRMCTPi3NALLeE RFSPoNSBN.EfPi PIIOTECINIOIXGYAT E. nMAY BENR£39NNroRELDADASTPAVEMflR ELEVAIKM TOPRfSFHL4MEROOT SYSTEMS oFTRE %sHaWN roBEwvED. coNlrucroR ro WonarlATE wlM oAwERs EFAIMEEP PRp11ro AP ElEVATW CHMIOE9. a PROPTO CONSMUCIIdI OF CONGEIE PAVEMENT,TNE CONTPACIORBroe1mMRA PPOR9EO JOINING PATTERN TOME OMIF19 ENOINFFMFdi REVIEW. ]. CONIIMCTOP TO PPOWOEAt? BP AONGIS EKPNF6mNJPM ANTEIBK WIM SENEP Ai ABOMENr of coNwEre Nm AP sTRU crLmE. a ALLPAVEMEPMARNNOS SMNLBE MADE WiM PERMANENTTHE PMOPVBTICANO SHNt COxFOnu TO PoOTSrAHOAPO MOE ]IA.I]JM,SHEET91 -T PARMN38TN19TPoRNOm xAP ENO ROANS. PUam siN�i.s�Ml�Nasa aa�EEw- MVATICEPrdE�YmN9H0MmTHE T W E %CONCPf fr, ABPHkn AND sPEaRGTm1N BHNL BE sueMnTEO m ME Nm wa wK & WNTMCfPi3HN1Mm. TACIL ANO -m- :T-1-0- I NCONIMCTOR 8HAL11N6TAL13rORMAMRPMOPAHDCIAVORSm ACCPmNFLE M]H FOpi D BmIXm3AHDRACE EKTRABASE MA1EiaALIYTffx 1NE05TANCEBETWEEN ME VESTED EIEVAnPI IND TILE LOP P" ME PIPE OP BELL SIESB MAN T WELVF I I ZI II. THE COxiHACTORSPESPO%RIEFW COORDPUIWG APPUCASIE iES1010 WTITNE SOBS ENGMff0.1! WSl %REPPPED PUR9U.WTT0 ME1E6nN09CHEMAE REP01¢D WAPRIGID£REGUUIOPY AGEHaE3 AND/9 WYBE FPMDw ME ENG�flaNO 16TRIICIIPO dLAw W Gs. wxnucTOP ro vemPY NL T�rlrm MM THE owrER PrnoR To coMUE•NCTxocDNSmlJCnoN. uPW cPARETmN OFME wTm MESans ENdNEEq MLSr ME a W W ERs ENOmEa cT:mwGTwns srATUwl MAT NL REGUIR eu exTS HAYE DRNNAGE SYSTEM NOTES I 4TANDARD woEt&91EFEP ro ME UrE6T FdtroN G FDOi smAO W AY Nm MKilc OES �6T SEwFR PIPE ALL &Fkl �PRNFORGEOCONCPETECIA.44N pS1Y OMI UKIE89 OTHEPVIeE NOrEDW DRNNAOE9T11tICILIRES8MkL0Em ACmRPNtCE W RN f W T R WDHAY AYO TUFFlC OEdOH 9TN�wPM daE98 OMET1w5E NOTED da a RoE IExGMSSHOHN APE APRmnLUTE MOro ME CEHTEP OFdumecF SIRUDNiE3 µ11H ME E %CEPRON of MDFIFD Dro AND RA9E0 END sECTpN6 µRICH u�iDl rvJw�DE mLEImTIIa wFE15 WTHa1TPAfmAREAS SRNLeE TED FOP wmLO�inuF�a4� wiFmLCroRrosoolHEDETOFnax Poxo Ae INdwTEOau RN+e wmllNarrowEEK COrET1aILT10N OPINE POND. B INE SIOPN DPNNAOE RRNO AND FlLTMTON 9Y91TOA 6HklBE 6U6IECTTOAVSUN. ER PProP TOME RA fxarYrof eKTMai THE coNIPACWTOPBMS uELLOORdru ATEw.kmsPEClIw of MECOMPLETEO erdwwATER NOTIPME DHPHEFP FBtBHRW6 MAwANCE TOS(NFPAE OWIA= P.CON� ro OR'40M RrCif 02 2000 PLANNING NW, TMENT WATER SYSTEM NOTES I. wCHE66HALL E£MNNTAmFD BFTMEEH SknTAPSEVme AND ,N MAWS. IF dFAPNICE CANNOTBE Nm1EYE0 BYADAERPIG WATERMARm THE 6ANRAPSEWER EHNL BE CW51R3WTED PERSAHRNw NOTENa t BCLOtY. z. A Hd1120NTKSEPARATION OF t0 FEET SNNE BE MNPNNED BflwEB! WATENMNNSAND SANRAPSEWE0. MNlS 51 W l HAVE A MMMIM OF 961xdE4 OF Cdtkll. 4 ALL WATER 6YSIEM WPd6RN1 WNFPaIWRH I DGLPEOUTATPwBTANDARp3 AND 6FEOFIGnOx3. CWFUCT9 BEMEEH WATEAAMD STORMOP 9ANRAPSEWEP ro %RE50.VE0 er NLOULTRE IADH RPE SHALL EaA45 RiN/,CCOIR4�CE WfI11N61A2T3p (AWWA CCw�laai NN ACL1URwNCEwTHOtANNAIh,0. --AA- AN091MLL.4OPfAR UNfa STANDARD MNROlE33. AND BImMWPRSFNIDEFN»Im4VCf WTTH ANSIA uww.clw - „} TIMBIT BLOCK W G . W DNV1 PEST W HE➢ JdNi3 51M1L fiE RLOMD FD AT ALL FlinNGB NO HroPNO6�w�ACpIPDM'CE IwIH Av.Wn3ikmAM9. t OIIGH IT SHNLeE wAN>r,DAxL£IMII AWwAGam. RPE eHYLBECU43 t3o AND MFF,MF PEgll� AENi60F6GR tB w ACGJRDNICE NWH nu�o-aAl. t FRnN9 TANDSMADHiSHALLBE S(NEdxEAOPVO WRN60.VENi WFl0ED 9LFEV1 It LLwmEP MAwS ANO WATER %IMt£3 TO BE INSTAtlEO tMDER ROM LYmEPDRARI SEPAwTroN. I MAIENAL9 AxD IWTNSIgUL'lION MEM0D5 FPt WATER [6TPIBUIIPB SVSTEl1 SNNLBE a Aqa; ➢NICE WRN THE LIIC PEOOUrORr AGENC fADfS, %AHR,AMI PoRCONSTPUCImN, LATEST NEVSmx TNPEOf Axp3lPRpAEFRk sPEaRCnmFS MEREm AwRw uwcarcTRUCnort OF PoTNRE TER sER W LE MNN DRDVSKIH9 Rem ax+NEClmrS MLSr eE eaoRPxATm MR WmH n re LocFLPEOLKArdW AGENCY DEPARMENTaF PuBUC unLTOES. I ALLCONPoNfN190F T1EwATEH9 %1EM.malldtm FRiiNOS, HYnMtli3, F CONNECTPS.AHD VkVE96HALL PENABI UNCOVERED INIILPROPEPI .YPPE99UNE i11E OMBEITB ENOmFEP. PNE %URETESTS mOE IN ALf MNCE wrtPwATEROEPMIMENi M'okYNA 3PEaFIGnONS. CONIRACTpt T NOIIfYOWNE113 ENdNEER AND WATBt DEPIATME PM6PECi0P3A6H0UR4IN ADVM 6 PFRFONHIBO TESTS. ,a cP+rlM+cmRro PERwrW daPONATpNAN0 eADlEleolmrcwLSAMPU1mREWmEo ro aBTAw cLEUFANCE aF ooM Eanc wATEP srsTEM TTUroLpH Low. RE W urary -Nl EEN; COnIF.s oFAU BACIeIIOLaGmtLTEmsroeE SUmHnmroarNETs SANITARY SEWER NOTES I .s3 mlm sEWE %amsslrm tmDfP wAml MARrs SNN1 BE wD ro RaWOE A MNSYW VERTMM dSTANCF OF tOma1E80ETwFEMME NIVEPLOFMEIVPEP RTE a 1HECROWN OFMEIOWFP PIPE. WNERF THIS MMIMUM SFPAPAlION GNNOTBE MAwTAWED.T&a1weING soMATTHE SEWm vmf .IaNlsewAIEP MNx.mM13 ARE EodwsTANr RmMMEPPMOFCROSSwO WRN NOIESS iNNF tO FFETBFIWEEM AxY 1WO.mINi3. kTANMEAE ,MESEWEP MAw MAYOE 11REET wABIEEVE DP ENtlSEO WCONCRETEm BFPNUimn' z MINGI3 EEF FEEi5HA3LeE MAPRNNED SE'MEENwAMR MNN9AN0 SANRAP %wER PARR a kL9ANRNRSEWEA MNNSeSERWCEUTFPAL49HNLBE COH6MUCrEUOFPWYWNH CHLdilOE RPE SDRSS. A. ALLaNlRAPSEWER WPaL8Nk1CPFTPiM WRH LOON.REGIRATOPY STABmAAD9 ANO sPR�OR�m�MMENanGwoRK WHICH REP6RES coexSCnNnxEVF WTxaro EI%nxG ux%oR ME COMMCTa181 W E YETV FY LOGMM Arm FLEYAI W N DF EM3nND C W NECimN�POwT ANO NOTFY OvmFP3 ENGRmEP 6 ANY C016vLT3 OR d8CPE9NILff 9 a PVC RPE AND RrtIN95HKLCPPPiM WITHAST.M. BPEPRCPTION80ESIGH/,MmO�O]AT]C, AU SDR m. INBTAlU1WN OFBOP RPE SHALLBE w 3PUCTALY %NNNICE WTiH MEPfWwEMEN90F a aFlOAImNDE91DNAM1NbffiI. NLSAMTAPSflYER PIPELINES SNALL8E 9011➢➢PEEN w CROP. >. ALLPW: FORGE YAWS WnMNPI1BNCH aAS8ma8dIZL MMGLJ -AGREE A MMI - M Y WE YB9- MEFDED GPAOETIE PRP ON ME NAGNETL TAPE SNPAD READ SP6E MNN. ALL O IRON RPE SHALLBE CLA03 ax M A cOROANCE xtMNS1Aw501AwHACt3q Alm ksl .s I (A N-A WWAC LLD.RPESHNIRECFA w1ERp]q ANDEmEPIOP R11MNOtm CGnHDIN ANCE WPI AN91 A2tA. A2,.a.OPAm3T. N. L9AVRMYSEWEPOMMYMNNBDP9MWNw8EWER FOPLE MANE THAT REWIRE D.LP. ME m eEPRYUNED OR EFOKYtMED. aALL BAHRAAY SE W Eii COVERS sl W 18F TPNTm IUIEO FOP N.m I[MgN3 . SANRAP6EwE %sxA4EHAVE ALBMUIMawEAOFMREE OI FEfT Afro SHKLeE MSTALLFD �amwAMFOPAMErkrwESWKAPro •mmArAPecroLOgeo GREEN AHDLND aNE FDOr A➢OVET�PRE. I PwxO6NNL eE BtAlhcrrOALa6UAi IN9PECRON BYTNE PAWEPS � wdHEFa comrw:TOP roxonFr THE ENdNEER m Hw 5 w.DVANCErosaIEDUE t MECdFTACroP61W1PG6gWN11NFM1TRATpWE %RLnNTNm TE4TWNLGMW1YSE -1N ACCORDANCEWM THE REGUATOHY ADEHI. HAYRm AIPoSWCfIpL SNOTESre APETDEE oc MNA- NANDwIM1uT�rolanuPAmroiESaTNecoNT-PACr RRES +FaNDIA M. t EMNNSSIwaBE9ls MANYORO9rATCR5s9uRET %Tw ACCOP�W __ 4 PEGUUTPrIAGEN(XXAVNG AIPoSDICDON.SNO TEYiSAte: TO�CERTREDPMEENdNEFAAIm GEOTECNNICroAI NOTEµ CONTPACrofl ItEWEW DFDLLOHaIIeTFUCImN iEWIUd 1E3ou,uNf01N ME SRE GEOTECHMGL REPgR. CLEARING AND EROSION CONTROL NOTES t APSnE CIEIAIN0, NL IFEES SHaYNro REMAM ONTHECCNBIdK :IN)N RANG SHALL BE PROTECTED IN ILDOROAr1LE WIIN TILE LOP IiEP M1IXw IflENCt9 TREE PidN4rc I&ANTTNLe CSETNEEDw ME6E RAF5. RSwEL .SHwm1'p BIUIY TO MNMNN ME9E mFE3M000a CONDMOM t1O REMNN8NALLBE REMwEO WTTNDIrt WdiTEN APPROVEFlTOIA AR OWNE0.WLY CRAdNG PFPMRTED MTMNMECAtmPYIMf OF1HEE3 MAT APE TO REMAm. a. TNF CONMncroRSroRLEPA RE MESnE Raw TO BEraNNINCACruALCattTRLV ;TroN m AIxP1DnxCE WrM ME sdL9TE�snNOSRF 'NR'i. cOPIESOr ME sd19 REPortf ME o wNnsTNREFREPraA TA RREMl= DIIlM�ESOUx�REF�oR M BE d15CLED MAIL CLEM AN. . -PA,Y MO% NPTIPl9 CF ME SRE NECE59AP FOR CONSTRUCnON. d9TURBEDARRASWRLBE9EE3Ea MLA .MRAPEDWM O1 HEA APPROYEO UNDSCAPE AIAIEPL.IIMMEDMTELY FPIOw HG CON91PUClION. .• ro r a GROUND REMP.m Duwrm aEimHO wAD GRUee W G BN.0 eE BTOGwLEDATA SIZE OESroNATFD Br MEONNEAro BE MSFB FOR 1AN09GRMl UNLE %OMERNSEdP£CIED BY Mf aAMEP. HAY BALE39NALLBF RACED kONOTHF SmCNAAIE PERMETEP FPiER091W CWMOL CPS1PUCfmH DEW15 AHDOTHRI WASTE MATEdk SHNL BE 05PoBEDOFOFFSRE iH a ACGCORwN(£WIMAPRIGESEPEWUTPS. ro OBrNN kL NECEaVAY PE PtR6 iDP PELtOV1N0 ANY E9nNfi BnaA;1Wi%R. TOOBI'MN SITEOIIND AMEEM- 1- P9WaTPPgRroIx9TN1AT%YI AP UNOEgORdINO NRITf S AND aEAAINO ME fiRE 3. POTECnON OFE9TW0 sroRM SEYeEEn sFSiFMS: DLRUxl mns *nuenoN, ALL Sronu SEWE AS -1 .13 D INLETS IN TILE Y44YIRry OF THE PPO.ECT SHNL OEPROTECTED PSEDME 1iPAPS SUW A SEaATED IMY BAlE9. SOD. Efa. WNICHSIWLBE MMMNNED ModRED AS RFGMREOPCdsinucnoNPPacHESS. LL05TRRm A5N9 WMOAEOroBE SODDED ARE ro BE SEEOFD AND MUCHED ro FOOT6TANDAP %AND MNMNNEDUMILA -INFER -SEE OFGPA49 ACLEPTAEIE ro ME REODUTOP AGENCY N10 ENGINEER HAV E BEEN OBTNNF p. AN HOIn'. REGMOINp, RESEEDING. AHD GRA %INO WDR(ANOOTNFA FR09mN WPM REWIRED, WILL %PEIifONMED PMECDNMALTPI llMalHESYSTEM SACCEPTED FPI MENNME BY ME REOtRATOP AGENCY ANp fN01NED1. I CONMAClOgS iOPRONDE EROSmN WMPa l3E01MEMATION BARiiIER ryiwW BME OR STAKED 81Li FENPO TO PREVENT SLL1N pN OF AD.MDFNT R10PERm, $TREE19, 9TIX W SEM1VEPS, WmE1M'AY9, ANDF9nNGwET1ANDS. IN ADORNIN, CONTMCTOR SHALL RACE STMW, NULaI ORORIFNSURABLE IMTEHIK ON GIIPMD W A- WHERE CONSTRUCMIN PFUTFD T W iflc 5 ro ENTER 4V 0 ExR ME sRE. ME D_ aF ME NEED ANMDH LOCKAUDpRT1E3.IXLE %wE WANnTE30FEARM APF MA•6PdiiED INiVR OP.UNAOE 011 BY THEEN RTRAFRC, MECONRMCTdiSm REmFa sNO f ARM ro THE GnsfnenoN GF ME ENSNEER ANO,an umlalrnES. t SN-S UM BECOMES 9IGWFlGN INGSIN ONSrmK:(YN. ME CONiMCf011 SILALL fiTA01UiE THE KTECTEO MEa USIxOBRtlxkwG, naawTpN. DR OMEP ACCEPTABLE METH0a9. t BE NO d9CMAPGE M1E. FTmPIML,SHEET ROW, SwALF. drPA ETC)INtO If 1�ilE COMPAOTCRDE3IRFSTI DIBCHNFGE THEE.- LAKESVSIEMORRNEPA 9ETNNG POND RAN MUSE BE SUfi W iIED N00 APPROJED P ME ENGI NEED AAD ID('.N. PEOUATIXiY AGENCY PRIPt TO COtf:MUCnON. LEGEND O PgOPo9EDASPIIALT PAVFWEM E. HAMDIGPPAPxirm SPACE O IOF PARMND SPACES �� PROPOSED ELEYATON ® PPOP9FD ➢Rat 00TTfIY OaET G9TPM9 - NDMB � ERR PBMDD MITERED EHD6ECTION O STORM MANNd.E ax �- 9WNE 9TOPNwNEn T40W E3A SLOPE OFPAYEMExi FLPv -r PWmSLOPE C. ...................... EPOBON WrnPOt P WA FA MNN mm BACmLON R1EVENIEn .. wTE VkvE ♦ f1RE NYPNNT .ao eLOwoFF ETER IOdMLLI Q/�I� cHLOPWE WB:cilat RAM V wATFIWNE SNMRF O6NRTARY SEYOER STPIFIURE NUMBED © sANrtawsEwEPMNM rv�E w SANRARYSS�RBEa�CE�IEML 6EE 6lIRVEY TOP E9Tx0 rtEM31EGEN0 V � `gym 2 cLL FE Cl) `21, W Lu a N W Z > m U d I�L Z D g r 0 0 N r C O J ¢�Y ro U_ O LL F LL v O u Z W o N D z 2 D: cc IW- = z ~' cc O w; LL w ch 0 Ln I r C -2 3 7 0 N Noe al„rh� W s A4 9 OP,,;',OINAL RAC 0 2 2008 y VF C04, NG 2 \ \ F � `� �o�:rNA. \ Vim(\• UGKnNG NOM: Ill UGM M W=PA=--"l IRE —DTO—WEA—ME BEFORE 1EFORE YOU DIG STATE ONE N • CALLOFFLORIDA 1400432 EALO N Noe al„rh� W s A4 9 OP,,;',OINAL RAC 0 2 2008 y VF C04, NG 2 \ \ F � `� �o�:rNA. \ Vim(\• UGKnNG NOM: Ill UGM M W=PA=--"l IRE —DTO—WEA—ME 3 0 2008 OF "qMwalk, U _j .j Z W W W = 2 t:� z 160 9 W S A- �_Z ox\ LU LL A w U_ z z z 9 o o.0 L SzMTOM z cc LL < cr MND. < F- UTIuw NOTES.- a: 9M, 00. V, LL Zzo v o S cl) .,o to — ago SECTION—— — - __ - - I I _ ... BEFORE TOU DIG CALL SUNSHINE STATE ONE CALLOFFLORIDA 1.4770 0 BEFORE YOU DIG CALL SUNSHINE STATE ONE CALLOFFLORIDA 14WD-=4770 ED t1r, DwTR% a URUTY NOTES —3 C5 (D Z l,_ J . G D) W c W W = 12 Z'2 L) Z a) C a Lu E cx < of 8 D 0 a 05 m Co 0 ul LL 1, 0 Z 0 cr cr < T- F- CC 0 U. C.) r- �2 C-5 — — L.-g–I O Gav- * BEFORE YOU DIG CALL SUNSHINE STATE ONE CALL OF FLORIDA I t!aa2 47!0 — C-6 Mkuf 0 2 2008 ............ - .............. ... . ...... ..... . - ----- isl 4155 c".-t! a777, 77 T LANP6C,AFV WlEr IE e — N ui Lij _T uj N z 3 W u, E :L ,e I s -2 0 y IV ca --------- SnAfwA TREE RVI—AL E TIMG TREES TO M en w zi 71 A? I I I mtoi-oSED w L) LL O,Z 0 ra 1 �1— k o0 z g (D O 45 I—M 1 —4* 3.y 0 Z . LL cl) 001e1u —1 M— Abb, — — L.-g–I O Gav- * BEFORE YOU DIG CALL SUNSHINE STATE ONE CALL OF FLORIDA I t!aa2 47!0 — C-6 V PLAN ELEVA PQN mjl 5- NOTES: HEAW DUTY PAMEMENTTO BE USED FOR ALL PAVEMENT IN THE PUSUC MGHT,0F WAY CONTRACTOR TO REFER TO THE GEOTECHNIM REPORT. BEFORNU DIG, CALL SUNSHTATE ON CALLORIDA 1404 k 4., �; 0 2 2006 'Rw " 7, 11 ........ ....... TYPICAL DRIVE SECTION .F--- I' D 5 5D E. SECTOR "A- A. NoTEs cm.g a�nwe.e. W� .� ,s a ,.I��wea.u' I; No" BUS STOP PAD HANDICAPPED STALL DETAIL mulsomp A A TYPICAL IRIIEW AY CROSSSS—lUl—o" PLAN MEW lai SECTION S-9 ASPHALT STREET AND DRIVEWAY REPLACEMENT REWIRED FOR UTILITY CONSTRUCTION ISOMETRIC ME FLEVATGN A-6 CONCRETE REPLACEMENT REQUIRED FOR UTILITY CONSTRUCTION E 11 —7 RETURNED CURD -{3gMP T" I T- SECTION B-3 a) (D Z c- 21 W w W Z C5 (D E 0 z ci CD c 0 0 UL ILL 0 Z 0 F- CC: 0 1. cl) r- C-7 4 lI OR,OI, itsce"M p2 200 IT S."d F- M-,P P, F.D.T. S-d d Ep-S-t. 90113 O fl-i. A E A ofN,- G Sfl, Of 0.20 T. 51- � DI-1- x Q.-D. .-B L) V V.C. PTLu AS. 3111 N. F 919 C, E_j A •DETENTION POND N. -S, 1/2- '1.. PA., A A. A, Apl- .1 EN, E,- 12 2,1 1 IS 1 SECTION B-F! Ma. OT NOTES: I) --d -A-in is ADS N. fP, 0 P-m RP Oy TEMPORARY BLOWOFF 2' PII ft� AND SAMPLE TAP 3/.- J 2' ---d 2' -p-T.,4 -P TOP CONNECTION pp 9 I- Check MUELLER H14350 ith Lock WPq %d� compress I., i,l,t ., Ap","d Threaded Corporation St, MUELLER H15008 app W AT 15- ANGLE) SNddl, ,q,,i,,d on 4' P.M.C. Nly w I,., D,,,,,pip, 5100 EFd,t/Y.,dI, service saddle BI- J,t. SDR 9, 3408 Pol,,,thyi... W Ford Ic er- �/St I.Pd r pp-d q,,l N't" Mom i 7 CHLORINATION TAP -- w 6 W W W ro g E A -o E -9. A , 0 C) 6' u--P SECTION A-A END CONNECTION M.R. r- F nap El- —len., W SERVICE CONNECTION DETAIL A,-- A,,RL NOWnI % -PIP, ., - . 12- FB,, .--j- A10I I,, P N, beefy -ppPI Th A., E Am, Fib-, ..I 11--d E, Section 39(_- Coprse A° reaat< and IN, #6 157, If '57 1, -.. .1 TA., irecloa 6y Engineer, IIA -INd --d IN -.- TI,- egad. APP., '. , E ...... .... d. p,:'-'l'b B_ PPR N�t P- PNC �Kh -- Te TYPICAL SUBDRAIN SECTION NON- ROADWAY IANFIMKII MAINS TO BE ON NORTH or EAST SIDE OF R.O.W. APPROX. A F!. 9AIX OF Cu. UNLESS .-CE-SE ALITIFRIZED BY CITY ENCTNIIR -CE CONNECTIONS TO BE 2 Ft FROM SIDE LOT UND ON EITHER SIDE OF LOT (SEE TEE - 3) THESE SERVICES TO BE CON-ENT ITHIN BID SUE-SION, PRI-PS SMALL NOT EIS -11 IS METERS. NBALL LINE SN-LL BE CN-B-0 AND ARESSUll TESTED (1111 FOR ONE HOUR * ISO PEAL) E-R THE DIRECTION OF TNE 11111TES UEPARNEIT, A- SUCCE-L NESTING AND DITLORIN11TOM - PRESSURE ElAU- REMAIN 01 THE SYSTEM,-1. ,I TNP NM,, AT ALL TER Fr NFRABATON EAER LINES. REQUIRED eEIKEN PARALLEL SANITARY ZEE, SADDLE IS REQUIRED FOR ALL SERVICE CONNECTIONS TO MANS 6. MINIMUM DISTANCE BETWEEN SERVICE TARS TO HE NOT LESS BUN 36', It A, %Ild CRBp-BiIN, Stop c,,lB STAR MUELLER B- 25008 NU-ER H24350 F- 543-332-M Lock 111, and (T., of T,5 Angle) --p'-ioP (3/4' I_ /2' 2" Fll .1 approved 2e 'i, ST.. ar Em romley BI., Jet. SDE 9, 3403 polyemypne &1,,, -,i� saddles Ford PC 202 A w /s -I IA A-1 EZ-d - Fd epo.y ... t� E-M.. I- b"y or I WEr-i-m-, i ,P, ed B EE Ss8 Wit Erb z w UL ILL 0 z z o Ln Q TERMINAL END -ABOUT UNDERDRAIN CLEANOUT DETAIL FOB, DI P. V. C. PIPE RESTRAINT A, D: F-DE T ' 11, -7 Pod, �,,: II,"P.B. IT =-=y E�7 Yyy. --------- SUBIATION A AET Z--T A =T`R- A- NE �l ENDS MID NI.D R-l-, (T,N,) LL CAP T-6-1/16 (22j') Street El, AS 03034 SDR 6- -1',, 8' C111,11d 11, 8 PVC UAB PINA, I., D.P-N .1 T.' R_END EP'l- �pw CAR ANCHOR �E-- -El-IL ill,.::. B . 22 X%: E-71-14 I '2 sx vs us Bh All !-`,.--'P,77,y7 a" E" PVC IN, J-4 'ET -E� A (deg) NE .1 FIRE `- E7 SN I A I P 5122501 SO TEES C ENO ZB E.TIB, or - BEFORE YOU 11 -.BBU IIIIA- SUNSHINE STATE ON CALL OF A, RE T� A 1-800-M-4770 C-81 �i�.'VMill W q 2 2008 4 ()V,4�1NAL R-CCEVED o a by PLANT S-Al DETAII. j2�VM PLANTING DETNI Qr—=r— PINE TREE PLANTING DETAIL Z A ul LLJ In A t-- W > Z > C) 0 a c 0 j I-Ima GENERAL LANDSCAPE DETAIL ara (NO-OFFSET) aarw� rera - S" -.d°" .wa mw.. ww -I -rw zt M. *REF PLANTING LLJ 991. =-Tz LL ILL 0 zo COO cr LL Fc w 0 0 LL cl) 1 �2 FERTILIZATION NOTES BEFORE YOU DIG SUNSHINE STATE ONE POO- CALL OF FLORIDA �A�A�2 -0T/O PALM PLANTING DETAIL ' C-10 opi�1;4DINAL V�'cei'AD 02 2006 L FLANNN14-40; NP SECTION 21, TOWNSHIP 29S, RANGE 15E CERTIFIED TO: 1573: LLC_ _T -ET IK 1a, -11—Y 11 11 .1 - c,r- .,d i_ 1. 1 "1', f-- -d I- —,g C E R T F I C A T 1 0 N JOHN C. BRENDLA AND ASSOCIATES, M. ",if, V- N11 1-1y 1-11,-d h — —t, th, C.N-11;Nq FN9:NIe,l -d L.Nd S.r-y.rl .... ..... Ih�j,11.: Ml- 1-11--- F30LINDARY SURVEY WITH roPOGRAPHY M -)N ND TREF LOCATI, JOIN SK-NDIA 7-1,— (7�7 576-7546 F:., (7,-1;' JCB .... .... " �`--" A S—Y— -8 750 — ------- --- ------------- All 'dM ED SC 411: 1" - 21 'M c 'N", �e— M R F v I s 1 0 N W _1 \I J 0 PROJECT NO.: D.B.: CH.: DWG: DATE: 2008 -04-10 \ \\ PARKING \ AREA �O f o �O� CONSTANT 15' VEGETATIVE BUFFER: AREA BETWEEN TOP OF BANK AND LINE = 4,691 S.F. VEGETATIVE BUFFER WITH REDUCED WIDTHS: AREA BETWEEN TOP OF BANK AND LINE = 4,873 S.F. EXISTING TOP OF BANK rXISj jN DITCH' • - -- i VEGETATIVE BUFFER LINE PER COMMUNITY DEV. CODE SEC. 3 -907 PROPERTY LINE —, i NO aua / EXSITING BUILDING p22008 VEGETATIVE BUFFER LINE 1573 FORT HARRISON OFFICE CASE # FLD2008 -03007 HOWARD CIVIL ENGINEERING, LLC Land Development Civil Engineers 1601 3rd St. S. Ste A. St. Petersburg, FL 33701 M Phone: (727) 490 -1784 Fax: (727) 490 -1787 @_20 NT e. ve . ELEVATION (NORTH) �erKw L0.M1a ®IaIN NMN . nAYmaxm N1gLw w1w K4a,aU J o Ien,®aRG/A RINIKAm� ) rumorar ",^ �H,IMamN -.4" �•�`�� flPY J' v armaaxm TNroWrue � wAeso ru,-.� 2m�aaccomran bMaMam� _rcQmlii ran®arvo urr u�K rtrA '3�i+ �' SIDE ELEVATION EAS 3 xAle: ve . iw• WP"` NNMY YYYIMNNWYI� �� -- ecrxy` v a w r I Li u , , • IwMFam N � awax rnnW , , rann�anvn .eewamew .. — - � ....._ nsaueoaaun nrrnMam.0 a,mus @_20 NT e. ve . ELEVATION (NORTH) REAR e' ELEVATION SSOUTH} xAi.e: v�3• COLOR �EC>av �., . NKMMlDNMCOmoabtlNl Y10 mt1fN.dLL Coma NMINLLNNM ramcaiam OOM=rrNW %Imtl NNIMNLLNMNfnd1C411Lf1e1 ,YAM, M,GNNIC CgmY . mar KINNMfGmmcauaMx VLIOX mMB10TA [q{RY NNm 1Y81Yr L6Crt (AI$lgl ,YOMItlGIINI%IIR lgmY - Ym11M.m061d `—w w amane`A IMamN 'OOR tJM O STRE ET ELEVATION (WEST) ci'�� ve• . i2 iMam a! �erKw L0.M1a ®IaIN NMN . nAYmaxm . w1w K4a,aU REAR e' ELEVATION SSOUTH} xAi.e: v�3• COLOR �EC>av �., . NKMMlDNMCOmoabtlNl Y10 mt1fN.dLL Coma NMINLLNNM ramcaiam OOM=rrNW %Imtl NNIMNLLNMNfnd1C411Lf1e1 ,YAM, M,GNNIC CgmY . mar KINNMfGmmcauaMx VLIOX mMB10TA [q{RY NNm 1Y81Yr L6Crt (AI$lgl ,YOMItlGIINI%IIR lgmY - Ym11M.m061d `—w w amane`A IMamN 'OOR tJM O STRE ET ELEVATION (WEST) ci'�� ve• . i2 iMam a! kN, oa. NN V. NN. NNY. NNV. x U D�H d U aAA rnAexuM nu,a N Ne��a womo R MXIAV N\ N1� M!ffi A -5 �erKw L0.M1a ®IaIN NMN ramragm• 1 est5rMata� 1 J o Ien,®aRG/A RINIKAm� ) rumorar ",^ �H,IMamN -.4" �•�`�� flPY J' v � rMll V]' W AJM SIDE ELEVATION EAS 3 xAle: ve . iw• WP"` kN, oa. NN V. NN. NNY. NNV. x U D�H d U aAA rnAexuM nu,a N Ne��a womo R MXIAV N\ N1� M!ffi A -5 2008 0 0 E ML I Avenue St. Petersburg, Florida 3372 0 LM C= CQ If C . G35 MT- H37 8803M Olde Fashion 8780W Crystal Ball 1-2-1 re (727) 522-TREE Owner. Bill Holmes (727) 2,24 -9592 Arborist- Debbie Rotlrwell (7'27) 22- 4.0005 0 1573 Fort Harrison Office Clearwater, FI The following assessment/recommendations are based on existing property conditions and ground visuals only. The trees have been rated on a scale of 1— 5 with 1 being dead and 5 being exceptional. 1) Live Oak — 24 DBH, Class 3 Average Recommendation: Savable - Removal of deadwood and selective pruning is advised. 2) Live Oak — Class 2 Declining Recommendation: Removal — Due to location of tree to existing structure as it is growing right up against the building and could cause structural damage to the foundation if it has not already done so. Tree is already in a serious state of decline. 3) Queen Palm — 12 DBH, Class 3 Average Recommendation: Savable 4) Queen Palm =11 DBH, Class 3 Average Recommendation: Savable 5) Queen Palm —12.5 DBH, Class 3 Average ®RMNA . RECWVW Recommendation: Savable MAR 03 2008 6) Washingtonia Palm —13 DBH, Class 4 Above Average PLANNING LiE Ma'lMN' Recommendation: Savable CITY OF CLEA1,?, A 7) Washingtonia Palm — 14 DBH, Class 4 Above Average Recommendation: Savable 8) Live Oak — 29 DBH, Class 2 Declining Recommendation: Removal — Existing root structure has undergone what appears to be years of root and soil compaction due to soil and concrete debris which has been piled all around the trunk of this tree and radiating approximately six feet out from the base. There appears to be a sparse canopy and massive dead wood with a lot of parasitic plant growth. The tree also appears to have a natural lean growth toward the proposed parking area which could present a target zone hazard to cars and pedestrians. 9) Laurel Oak — 27 DBH, Class 2 Declining Recommendation: Removal — This tree is in a serious state of decline with a lot of epicormic growth, limb breakage with unhealed wounds and massive parasitic plant growth throughout the canopy as well as a Brazilian Pepper tree growing from the base. • 10) Queen Palm — 9 DBH, Class 4 Above Average Recommendation: Savable �., _�, .1_0, MAR 03 2000 CITY OF CLEARWATEGr 11) Unknown Species — 9 DBH, Class 2 Declining Recommendation: Removal — This tree has no significant canopy and is crowding the Queen Palm ( #10) noted above. 12) Hybrid Oak — 21 DBH, Class 1 Declining/Dead Recommendation: Removal — This tree is effectively dead and is crowding the Queen Palm (#10) noted above. 13) Hybrid Oak — 12.5 DBH, Class 2 Declining Recommendation: Removal — This tree is in a state of decline with a very sparse canopy. 14) Hybrid Laurel Oak —12.5 DBH, Class 2 Declining Recommendation: Savable — Removal of deadwood and selective pruning could improve the Viability of this tree. 15) Hybrid Laurel Oak —13.5 DBH, Class 2 Declining Recommendation: Removal - Massive vine growth has overtaken entire tree. 16) Shumard (Turkey) Oak —15 DBH, Class 2 Severe Decline Recommendation: Removal — Massive dead wood with small limb growth. This tree is very Close in proximity to #14 and #15 noted above causing canopy competition and crowding. The removal of this tree would greatly improve the health of the other oak (#14). 17) Live Oak — 44 DBH, Class 3 -4 Average to Above Average Recommendation: Savable — This tree would greatly benefit from deadwood removal, selective pruning and vine removal but should remain Viable depending on how close the proposed storm water pond is to the trunk. I would recommend root pruning on the side closest to the proposed pond before any digging is commenced. 18 — 21) Queen Palms — Class 3 -4 Average to Above Average Recommendation: Savable — These palms are severely growth inhibited by the Turkey Oak (Class 2) on the adjacent property as they are trying to grow through what's left of its canopy. If this severely declining oak is removed, these palms should thrive. 22) Laurel Oak — 11 DBH, Class 2 -3 Average to declining Recommendation: Savable — This tree would benefit from dead wood and vine removal as well as selective pruning. 23) Unknown Species — 9.5 DBH, Class 1 -2 Declining/Dead Recommendation: Removal — Two main codominant trunk leads have already been removed from this tree and the adjacent palm ( #24) would also benefit from its removal. 0 0 MAR 03 2000 24) Sabal Palm —13 DBH, Class 4 Above Average PLANNING DRARIMEN-6 Recommendation: Savable CITY OF CLE RWATER 25) Laurel Oak — 17 DBH, Class 2 Declining Recommendation: Removal — This tree is in a serious state of decline and has been improperly pruned over the years leaving many unhealed wounds which have contributed to its decline. It also has a sparse canopy with diminished leafibud growth. 26) Queen Palm — 11 DBH, Class 4 Above Average Recommendation — Savable 27) Queen Palm — 9.5 DBH, Class 4 Above Average Recommendation: Savable 28) Hybrid Live Oak — 38 DBH, Class 3 Average Recommendation: Savable — Tree would benefit from dead wood removal and selective pruning. 29) Sabal Palm — 14.5 DBH, Class 2 Below Average due to location Recommendation: Removal — This tree is inhibiting the growth of the adjacent Live Oak. 30) Sabal Palm — 14 DBH, Class 2 Below Average .due to location Recommendation: Removal — This tree is inhibiting the growth of the adjacent Live Oak. 31) Washingtonia Palm —13 DBH, Class 3 Average Recommendation: Savable 32 — 36) Sabal Palms — Class 3 Average Recommendation: Savable 37) Small Hybrid Oak —10 DBH, Class 2 Declining Recommendation: Removal — This tree is growing far to close to the existing building and appears to have suffered trunk damage (possibly hit by a car) with an unhealed wound making it susceptible to disease and insect infestation. The canopy is also compromising existing service wires to the buildings. Bad location for this species. 38) Sabal Palm — Class 3 Average Recommendation: Savable Lu , C= s� co 41f Lu A CL Z_ CL exunann wvs BEFORE YOU M CALL SUNSH04E STATE ONE CALL OF FLORIDA 1- 00432.4770 w.a.crximn t \ \ e \ r «,r w„uva Jy 47 J z C u rc O �F ,u Z?' 50 0 W tD J E m 5 m�e m W N pa�nC Q c m M C O�$a x a 41 �¢E LL! U LL LL 0 z Z° N.LL Lr Lr a: z- �r0 =30 n 0 Z lift ,sr ¢ ` \•• , . yY y �`- �s�~ --_• mow~ CQ ` /•, '+ \llimb rolldtlY�W �I[II - - - -- �� \ \ \, :w. Zia • ' i.:�[ � \ �r aMxo eEronErouWA upl:nu, SUMHM STATEONE . '°'vl•600 32 TAM Us Fw.uiulo I' .9p V�rwMM�IM�TMIe lL•,+� r �` �� `I � \��v , \�"W7�` a.n aen�i�ruw��fVl�u•W Wc�) 1 C-7 0 0 1573 Fort Harrison Office Addendum March 8, 2008 The following is an addendum to the earlier tree survey submitted on March 3, 2008. This addendum addresses the condition of the existing trees within a 25' radius of the existing site plan and again, these trees have been rated on a scale of 1— 5 with 1 being dead and 5 being exceptional. This survey is based on existing property conditions and ground visuals only. 1) Live Oak — Class 4 -5 Above Average Recommendation: Savable - This adolescent Oak appears to be in excellent condition, has been properly pruned and seems to be thriving to spite an existing culvert drainage pipe which runs adjacent tothe tree on the west side within 2 -3 feet of the trunk and an existing water meter located approximately 3 -4 feet from the trunk on its east side. 2) Mature Live Oak — Class 3 Average Recommendation: Savable — This very mature Live Oak is located directly adjacent to the "Fairwinds" driveway with the pavement poured right up to the trunk. This tree appears. to have endured construction stress very well as it was there long before the Fairwinds property was developed. 3) Mature Live Oak — Class 3 Average Recommendation: Savable — Again, this very mature Live Oak which is located on the perimeter of the "Fairwinds" parking lot, directly adjacent to the existing driveway, appears to be doing well. 4) Mature Live Oak — Class 2. Declining Recommendation: Savable — This tree is on the decline but could benefit from dead wood removal and selective pruning. 5) Unknown Species — Class 2. Severe Decline Recommendation: Removal — This tree is a scrawny volunteer plant that has come up in the wrong location for a healthy, existence. It has tall, spindly leads with a sparse canopy and is crowding the adjacent Oak Tree. 6) Mature Hybrid Oak — Class 2 -3 Declining Recommendation: Savable — Two dead leads need to be removed along with dead wood removal, selective pruning and vine removal to improve its chances for survival. 7) Queen Palm (Yearling) —Class. 3 Average Recommendation: Relocate — This young tree is just in a bad location. It should be relocated to allow for growth as it is crowding two existing Oaks and is competing for sunlight and nutrients. I believe that this tree would thrive in a different location. ORAL. MAR 12 2008 001 OF CLE �-,w1 X `.+ 1 H 0 W A R DO L �p CIVIL ENGINEERING ^0 < ((�� co " .� !1�{m w LL U o n�? 9 � z Stormwater Report��„ M Il�l�n, C6 Q for �U c _ 4,x,.1' ® F- 1573 Fort Harrison Office W M U, I-- Lo N Prepared for.• Ed Seifried Construction Submitted to: City of Clearwater SWFWMD Southwest Florida Water Management District � 11 1 PUCE 14 2000 0 e !�`►�,Rn P AI�4f� ING DEP "came.VIIE 1T CI ny ®Irr CL1-A ! "oVCR 2x08 4, Trevor D.r1 -wed, P"., &nda4? fit. �� w • /w....A(_jt, • ' e �G�. Howard Civil Engineering, LLC 1601 3rd Sheet South - Suite A St. Petersburg; FL , °70/�eQA�ees4e Office (727) 490 -1784 (Fax) 727 - 490 -1787 www.HowardCivilEngineering.com. r r t 1 Table of Contents PART A — GENERAL INFORMATION Project Narrative Pre Development Basin Map Post Development Basin Map PART B — Basin A Pre / Post Drainage Volume Calculations Stage/Storage Calculations Underdrain Calculations PART C — Basin B Pre / Post Drainage Volume Calculations Stage /Storage Calculations Underdrain Calculations APPENDIX GEOTECHNICAL REPORT OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE INSTRUCTIONS I Howard Civil Engineering, LL 1601 3rd Street South - Suite A St. Petersburg, FL 33701 Office (727) 490 -1784 (Fax) 727490 -1787 www.HowardCivilEngineering.com 1 0 • PART A � GENERAL INFORMATION 19; I a r n Howard Civil BVineering, LLC 1601 3rd Street South - Suite A St Petersburg, FL 33701 Office (727) 490 -1784 (Fax) 727 -490 -1787 www.HowardCmIEngineering.com OProject Narrative 0 PROJECT LOCATION The project is located on the east side of South Ft. Harrison Ave just north of Howard Court. The address is 1573 South Ft. Harrison Ave in the City of Clearwater, Pinellas County, Florida. Section 21, Township ,m 29S, Range 15E. PROJECT SIZE The project size is 0.96 acres. EXISTING CONDITIONS There is currently a building on the site. Runoff from the site drains to a creek on the north side of the property. The area between the building and the creek has always been used as a hard surface parking facility where no attenuation or treatment of stormwater was previously provided. From soil borings conducted in the area of the proposed retention pond, the Seasonal High Water Table is estimated to be 4 feet below existing grade. This is due to the drawdown effects of the creek. PROPOSED CONDITIONS The owner of the site wishes to improve the site by constructing a new 15,000 sf square foot parking area with the associated stormwater facilities to serve it. �I There will be two separate drainage basins that both drain to the creek. Basin A will collect runoff from the roof area and will drain to Pond A, Basin B will collect runoff from the proposed parking area and will drain to Pond B. r There will be a 15 foot maintenance area from the top of bank of the creek. A stormwater retention pond will collect all runoff from the improved areas. This retention pond will treat the water quality volume for the site before discharging stormwater into receiving water bodies. DESIGN CRITEREA City of Clearwater The stormwater ponds will attenuate the difference between OQ =ACIA x the 1 hour time of concentration. The water quality volume of the pond will draw down in less than 24 hours. M SWFWMD The water quality volume of the first 1/2 -inch of runoff from the project area will be collected and treated via an effluent filtration system. Conclusion The proposed stormwater management facility will meet the stormwater requirements of the SWFWMD, and the City of Clearwater. Howard Civil Engineering, LLC 1601 3rd Street South - Suite A St. Petersburg, FL 33701 OfTioe (727) 490 -1784 (Fax) 727 -490 -1787 www.HowardCivilEngineering.com 1 0 0 1 I k PARTB - BasinA ' Howard CW/ Engineering, LLC 1601 3rd Sheet South - Suite A St. Petersburg, FL 33701 Office (727) 490 -1784 (Fax) 727 - 490 -1787 www.HowardCivilEngineering.com 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 t 1 1 1 0 0 STORMWATER CALCULATIONS PROJECT NAME: 1573 S FT.HARRISON April 10, 2008 BASIN A PRE - DEVELOPMENT CONDITIONS RUNOFF AREA AREA COEFFICIENT PRODUCT LAND USE (ac) (Sf "C" C x A IMPERVIOUS 0.133 5,793 0.475 0.063 PERVIOUS 0.049 2,134 0.20 0.010 TOTAL 0.182 7,928 0.073 "C" WEIGHTED AVERAGE = 0.40 TIME OF CONCENTRATION= USE 60 MINUTES POST - DEVELOPMENT CONDITIONS REQ'D STORAGE = AQ = ACIA AC= 0.42184 1 (in /hr) RUNOFF A (acres) 0.182 AREA AREA COEFFICIENT PRODUCT LAND USE (ac) (SD "C" C x A IMPERVIOUS 0.133 5,793 0.95 0.126 PERVIOUS 0.032 3,479 0.20 0.006 POND 0.017 1,354 1.00 0.017 TOTAL 0.182 10,626 0.150 "C" WEIGHTED AVERAGE = 0.82 REQ'D STORAGE = AQ = ACIA AC= 0.42184 1 (in /hr) 3.6 A (acres) 0.182 OQ= 0.28 TOC (sec) 3600 STORAGE VOLUME AQ X 3600 = 995.0 CU.FT 1 1 1 1 i 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 C� r] L PROJECT: 1573 S. FT.HARRISON 10 -Apr -08 05:37 PM FILENAME: Z:1SeifriedlFort HarrisonlDrainagelCity of Clearwater Drainage Calcs1[STORM/ Staae - Storaae Calculations Elevation (ft NGVD) Area (sq ft) Area (acres) Incremental Volume (ac -ft) Cumulative Volume (ac -ft) 36.00 127 0.003 0.000 37.00 463 0.011 0.007 0.007 38.00 1038 0.024 0.017 0.024 VOLUME (ac -ft) 0.008 WATER QUALITY (ft) 37.05 ELEVATION 25 -YR WATER (cu -ft) 995 QUANTITY VOLUME CONTRIBUTING AREA (ac) 0.182 DEPTH OF (in) 0.50 TREATMENT WATER (cu ft) 330 QUALITY VOLUME (ac -ft) 0.008 WATER QUALITY (ft) 37.05 ELEVATION 25 -YR WATER (cu -ft) 995 QUANTITY VOLUME (ac -ft) 0.023 (cu -ft) 995 QUALITY + QUANTITY VOLUME . (ac -ft) 0.023 25 -YR WATER QUANTITY (ft) 37.93 ELEVATION r W m m m M'= MM MM m m m" MW M W Variable Filter Area " M:C.unstant '. Rock Site Data Project area = 0: Rainfall runoff depth = 0 :. Required treatment volume = 3 Underdrain pipe length (LP) 1 Underdrain pipe diameter AVG. FLOW (Q,+Q2)/2 ( CFH) Manning's n O;b Total bleeddown time 5; Pond Volume okay? Y Recovery time okay? Y Underdrain pipe size okay? Y Underdrain invert elevation okay? `Y 5 acres A= INCR. HEAD (FT.) 37. inches (OFW ?) B = FILTER FLOW LENGTH L (FT.) 36. cubic feet C = AVG. FLOW (Q,+Q2)/2 ( CFH) 35. feet 0. inches 6: Area of pond at elevation A = 5 hours Area of pond at elevation B = 1.80 T 332 Average pond surface area AR = 2.00 3 25 Maximum Filter Flow Length = 2: Thin.Blue Numbers = Input data Bold Red Numbers Answers ft. - Elevation of the top of water quality treats ft. - Elevation of the bottom of the treatment ft. - Underdrain invert elevation ft. - Distance from bottom (B) to the centerlin Darcy's k (ft/hr) square feet square feet square feet feet - flow length through the filter media (2' 1 WATER ELEV. (FT.) TOT. HEAD (h) (FT.) INCR. HEAD (FT.) DER VOL. (V) (CUYT.) INCR. VOL. (CU.FT.) FILTER FLOW LENGTH L (FT.) HYD. GRAD. i = h/LP FILTER AREA AF= L x H FLOW Q =kiAF ( CFH) AVG. FLOW (Q,+Q2)/2 ( CFH) ]NCR. TIME (HRS) TOTAL TIME (HRS) 37.05 1.80 332 2.00 0.9000 25 120 0.18 81 110 0.74 0.74 36.88 1.63 250 2.00 0.8125 23 99 0.18 71 90 0.79 1.54 36.70 1.45 179 2.00 0.7250 20 80 0.18 61 72 0.85 2.39 36.53 1.28 118 2.00 0.6375 18 63 0.18 50 0.90 3.29 36.35 1.10 68 2.00 0.5500 16 48 0.18 40 142 0.95 4.24 36.18 0.92 28 2.00 0.46214 35 0.18 28 0.95 5.18 36.00 0.75 0 2.00 0.3750 12 24 U • • PART C -Basin B Howard CM7 Engineering, LLC 1601 3rd Sbeet Soud7 - Suite A St. Petersburg, FL 33701 Office (727) 490 -1784 (Fax) 727 - 490 -1787 www.HowardCivilEngineering.com 0 0 STORMWATER CALCULATIONS PROJECT NAME: 1573 S. FT HARRISON April 10, 2008 BASIN B PRE - DEVELOPMENT CONDITIONS POST - DEVELOPMENT CONDITIONS 0.48141 1 (in /hr) RUNOFF A(acres) 0.546 AREA AREA COEFFICIENT PRODUCT LAND USE (ac) (sfl "C" C x A IMPERVIOUS 0.000 0 0.95 0.000 PERVIOUS 0.286 12,458 0.20 0.057 SHELL /GRAVEL (50% C) 0.260 11,326 0.47 0.122 TOTAL 0.546 23,784 0.179 "C" WEIGHTED AVERAGE = 0.33 POST - DEVELOPMENT CONDITIONS TOTAL 0.546 221039 0.442 "C" WEIGHTED AVERAGE = 0.81 AQ = ACIA AC= 0.48141 1 (in /hr) RUNOFF A(acres) 0.546 AREA AREA COEFFICIENT PRODUCT LAND USE (ac) (sfl "C" C x A IMPERVIOUS 0.395 17,206 0.95 0.375 PERVIOUS 0.105 3,479 0.20 0.021 POND 0.046 1,354 1.00 0.046 TOTAL 0.546 221039 0.442 "C" WEIGHTED AVERAGE = 0.81 AQ = ACIA AC= 0.48141 1 (in /hr) 3.6 A(acres) 0.546 AQ= 0.95 TOC (sec) 3600 STORAGE VOLUME AQ X 3600 = 3406.5 CU.FT 0 rPROJECT: 1573 S. FT HARRISON 10- Apr -08 05:45 PM FILENAME: Z:\Seifried \Fort Harrison \Drainage \City of Clearwater Drainage Calcs\[STORMI r 1 c 1 Staae - Storaae Calculations Elevation (ft NGVD) Area (sq ft) Area (acres) Incremental Volume (ac -ft) Cumulative Volume (ac -ft) 32.00 940 0.022 0.000 33.00 1235 0.028 0.025 0.025 34.00 1575 0.036 0.032 0.057 35.00 1955 0.045 0.041 0.098 QUALITY (ft) 32.91 ELEVATION 25 -YR WATER (cu -ft) 3,407 QUANTITY VOLUME CONTRIBUTING AREA (ac) 0.55 DEPTH OF (in) 0.50 TREATMENT WATER (cu -ft) 991 QUALITY VOLUME (ac -ft) 0.023 WATER QUALITY (ft) 32.91 ELEVATION 25 -YR WATER (cu -ft) 3,407 QUANTITY VOLUME (ac -ft) 0.078 STACKED (cu -ft) 3,407 QUALITY + QUANTITY VOLUME (ac -ft) 0.078 25 -YR WATER QUANTITY (ft) 34.52 ELEVATION ==Now M MM M oft Site Data Project area f Rainfall runoff depth = Required treatment volume Underdrain pipe length (Lp), Underdrain pipe diameter Manning's n = Total bleeddown time = Pond Volume okay? Recovery time okay? Underdrain pipe size okay ?m Underdrain invert elevation okay? �- 01;$ � acres A �., 3,7, 05 ft. - Elevation of the top of water quality treatment volume inches (OFW ?) B36 00 ft. - Elevation of the bottom of the treatment volume or the pond cubic feet C35 0:0 ft. - Underdrain invert elevation feet0 75 ft. - Distance from bottom (B) to the centerline of the underdrain inches5'42 Darcy's k (ft/hr) Area of pond at elevation A 55.5 square feet hours Area of pond at elevation B square feet Average pond surface area Ap ?341; square feet Maximum Filter Flow Length feet - flow length through the filter media (2' minimum). DER VOL. (V) (CU.FT.) ,: ;u330! r12 ;Ttx6 HYD. GRAD. i = h /LP Yes; 1 Xes ep. � 2W-�� }Ye"s' WATER ELEV. (FT.) TOT. HEAD (h) (FT.) INCR. HEAD (FT.) DER VOL. (V) (CU.FT.) INCR. VOL. (CU.FT.) FILTER FLOW LENGTH L (FT.) HYD. GRAD. i = h /LP FILTER AREA AF= L x H FLOW Q =kiAF ( CFH) AVG. FLOW (Ql +Q2) /2 ( CFH) INCR. TIME (HRS) TOTAL TIME (HRS) 37.05 1.80 332 2.00 0.9000 25 120 0.18 81 110 0.74 0.74 36.88 1.63 250 2.00 0.8125 23 99 0.18 71 90 0.79 1.54 36.70 1.45 179 2.00 0.7250 20 80 0.18 61 72 0.85 2.39 36.53 1.28 118 2.00 0.6375 18 63 0.18 50 56 0.90 3.29 36.35 1.10 68 2.00 0.5500 16 48 0.18 40 42 0.95 4.24 36.18 0.92 28 2.00 0.4625 14 35 0.181 1 281 1 301 0.95 5.18 36.001 0.751 1 01 1 2.001 0.37501 121 24 C J • 1 0 0 1 1 APPENDIX Howard Civil Engineering, LLC 1601 3rd: Sheet South - Suite A St. Petersburg, FL 33701 Office (727) 490 -1784 (Fax) 727490 -1787 www.HowardCfvilEngineering.com 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 • GEOTECHNICAL EXPLORATION, ONSULTATION SERVICES REPORT Proposed Parking Lot 1573 South Fort Harrison Avenue ;learwater, Pinellas County, Florida ASC Project No. 08T2003 ASC Document No. 080046L 6 March 2008 prepared for: Mr. Trevor Howard, P.E. Howard Civil Engineering, LLC 1601 3rd Street South, Suite A St. Petersburg, Florida 33701 www.ascworld.net r fl 0 0 Mr. Trevor Howard Howard Civil Engineering, LLC 1601 3rd Street South, Suite A St. Petersburg, Florida 33701 Subject: In -Field Permeability Testing, Geotechnical Exploration, and Engineering Consultation Services Report Proposed Parking Lot 1573 South Fort Harrison Avenue Clearwater, Pinellas County, Florida 6 March 2008 ASC Project No. O8T2003 ASC Document No. O8OO46L Dear Mr. Howard: ASC geosciences, inc. is pleased to submit two (2) originals plus an electronic PDF. version on CD of the In -Field Permeability Testing, Geotechnical Exploration, and Engineering Consultation Services Report to Howard Civil Engineering, LLC, for the project referenced above. It has been a pleasure to work on this project. We look forward to being involved during the construction phase of the project as well. Please contact us should you have any questions or require additional information. Sincerely, ASC geosciences, inc. Prashanth Vaddu, E.I. Project Engineer Jay Saxena, P.E. Senior Project Manager Florida Registration No. 54638 1 ■ contacts: phone: 813.908.0630 fax: 813.908.0640 www.ascworld.net ■ physical address: ASC geosciences, inc. 6702 Benjamin Road, Suite 100 Tampa, Florida 33615 1 ■ contacts: phone: 813.908.0630 fax: 813.908.0640 www.ascworld.net 0 0 Mr. Trevor Howard Howard Civil Engineering, LLC In -Field Permeability Testing, Geotechnical Exploration, and Engineering Consultation Services Report Proposed Parking Lot 1573 South Fort Harrison Avenue Clearwater, Pinellas County, Florida ASC Project No. 08T2003 ASC Document No. 080046L TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1 .1 Terms of Reference 1.2 Project Description and Background 1.3 Purpose and Scope of Work 2.0 FIELD EXPLORATION AND LABORATORY TESTING PROGRAM 2.1 Field Exploration Program 2.1 .1 Test Borings 2.2 Laboratory Testing Program 3.0 SITE, GROUND - WATER, AND SOIL CONDITIONS 3.1 Site Features 3.2 Estimated Seasonal High Water Levels 3.3 Subsurface Soil Conditions 4.0 OBSERVATIONS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS 4.1 Site Preparation, Fill Placement, and Inspection 4.2 Ground -Water Control 4.3 Pavement Areas 4.3.1 General 4.3.2 Asphalt (Flexible) Pavements 4.3.2.1 Standard Duty versus Heavy Duty 4.3.2.2 Stabilized Subgrade 4.3.2.3 Base Course 4.3.2.4 Wearing Surface 4.3.3 Effects of Ground -Water 4.3.4 Curbing 4.3.5 Construction Traffic 4.4 Pond Areas 5.0 CONSTRUCTION CONSIDERATIONS 6.0 LIMITATIONS 6.1 General 6.2 Scope of Services 6.3 Changed Conditions 6.4 Reproduction ASC geosciences, inc. 6 March 2008 0 0 Mr. Trevor Howard ASC geosciences, inc. Howard Civil Engineering, LLC 6 March 2008 In -Field Permeability Testing, Geotechnical Exploration, and Engineering Consultation Services Report Proposed Parking Lot 1573 South Fort Harrison Avenue Clearwater, Pinellas County, Florida ASC Project No. 08T2003 ASC Document No. 080046L 7.0 REFERENCES Figure 1 Project Site Location and Vicinity Map Figure 2 USDA -SCS Soil Survey Map Figure 3 Project Layout and Test Location Plan Figure 4 Boring Log Profiles APPENDIX A Important Information About Your Geotechnical Engineering Report by ASFE 1 1 L Mr. Trevor Howard Howard Civil Engineering, LLC In -Field Permeability Testing, Geotechnical Exploration, and Engineering Consultation Services Report Proposed Parking Lot 1573 South Fort Harrison Avenue Clearwater, Pinellas County, Florida ASC Project No. 08T2003 ASC Document No. 080046L 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Terms of Reference ASC geosciences, inc. 6 March 2008 ASC geosciences, inc. was retained by Howard Civil Engineering, LLC, to provide certain In -Field Permeability Testing, Geotechnical Exploration, and Engineering consultation services for the proposed Parking Lot located at 1573 South Fort Harrison Avenue, in Clearwater, Pinellas County, Florida (hereafter referred to as the "project site "). Refer to Figure 1 for a Project Site Location and Vicinity Map. These services were performed in general accordance with ASC Proposal No. 08019L dated 19 February 2008. 1.2 Project Description and Background Based on a review of the information and architectural site plan provided by the Client and site reconnaissance project details are summarized below: ► the project entails construction of two ponds and 43 space parking area; ► a two -story building exists on the southern portion of the property; No additional civil or site details (existing and /or proposed finished elevations) are available at this time. Upon finalization these items should be forwarded to ASC for further consultation and review for compliance with the recommendations presented herein. Limitations of the work performed for this project, including this report itself, are discussed in Section 6.0. 1.3 Purpose and Scope of Work The purpose of the In -Field Permeability Testing, Geotechnical Exploration, and Engineering consultation services completed by ASC for the project site was to describe, in general terms, soil and ground -water conditions encountered at the site and to evaluate the subsurface conditions relative to design and construction of ponds and parking areas. To achieve this purpose, the scope of services included the following elements: ► advancing two (2) test borings to a depth of approximately 10.0 ft below existing ground surface (egs) within the proposed ponds; 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 i Mr. Trevor Howard Howard Civil Engineering, LLC In -Field Permeability Testing, Geotechnical Exploration, and Engineering Consultation Services Report Proposed Parking Lot 1573 South Fort Harrison Avenue Clearwater, Pinellas County, Florida ASC Project No. 08T2003 ASC Document No. 080046L ASC geosciences, inc. 6 March 2008 P. performing five (5) test borings to a depth of approximately 10.0 below egs within the proposed parking areas; ► conducting two (2) falling head permeability tests within the proposed pond areas; ► obtaining representative soil samples from the test borings; ► backfilling and /or grouting the boreholes in general accordance with applicable guidelines; ► reviewing soil samples and performing laboratory tests on selected samples to evaluate pertinent engineering characteristics of the soil and assist in their classification; ► evaluating generalized boring data as well as ground -water conditions; ► compiling the field exploration data, laboratory testing data, and engineering recommendations in this report; and, ► providing two (2) original signed and sealed reports by a registered engineer of the firm plus an electronic version on CD. 2.0 FIELD EXPLORATION AND LABORATORY TESTING PROGRAM 2.1 Field Exploration Program As discussed in Section 1.3 above, subsurface conditions within the project site were explored by a total of seven (7) test borings at locations illustrated in Figure 3 (Project Layout and Test Location Plan). The field exploration program was performed on 25 and 26 February 2008. 2.1.1 Test Borings The test borings were advanced by a truck - mounted drill rig using a wet - rotary procedure. Representative soil samples were obtained using the split - barrel sampling procedure discussed below. In this procedure, a 2 -in. outer - diameter, split - barrel sampler is driven into the soil by a 140 -lb hammer with a free -fall of 30 -in. The number of blows required to drive the sampler through a 12 -in. interval is termed the Standard Penetration Resistance, 2 Mr. Trevor Howard ASC geosciences, inc. Howard Civil Engineering, LLC 6 March 2008 In -Field Permeability Testing, Geotechnical Exploration, and Engineering Consultation Services Report Proposed Parking Lot 1573 South Fort Harrison Avenue Clearwater, Pinellas County, Florida ASC Project No. 08T2003 ASC Document No. 080046L or "N ", value, and is indicated for each sample on the boring log. The "N" value may be taken as an indication of the relative density of granular soils in -situ. Samples obtained from the field exploration program and not subject to laboratory testing have been stored at ASC's laboratory. These samples will be retained as for 60 days from the date of release of this report. ' 2.2 Laboratory Testing Program Laboratory tests are generally performed to assist in the classification of soils based on ' their mechanical and physical behavior. Based on the results of laboratory tests, an indication of physical properties for a soil can be determined. Laboratory tests completed on soil samples retrieved for this project include: ► eight (8) moisture content determinations; 1 1 1 1 ► eight (8) minus #200 sieve tests; ► four (4) organic content determination tests; and, ► visual classification in general accordance with ASTM D 2488. As noted above, results for each of these laboratory tests are summarized at the respective sample depths on the boring logs (Figure 4). 3.0 SITE, GROUND - WATER, AND SOIL CONDITIONS 3.1 Site Features The project site is located at 1573 South Fort Harrison Avenue in Clearwater, Pinellas County, Florida, as illustrated on the Project Site Location and Vicinity Map presented in Figure 1. The site is a partially vacant lot with scattered trees and a two- storied structure to the south. The site is bound by a ditch to the north and east, South Fort Harrison Avenue to the west, and a single -story structure to the south. The eastern portion of the project site is (approximately 1.0) at a higher elevation compared to the rest of the property. The site itself is at a lower elevation (approximately 1.0 ft) than South Fort Harrison Avenue to the west. 3 Mr. Trevor Howard ASC geosciences, inc. Howard Civil Engineering, LLC 6 March 2008 In -Field Permeability Testing, Geotechnical Exploration, and Engineering Consultation Services Report Proposed Parking Lot 1573 South Fort Harrison Avenue ' Clearwater, Pinellas County, Florida ASC Project No. 08T2003 ASC Document No. 080046L ' 3.2 Estimated Seasonal High Water Levels At the time of the field exploration program, ground -water was observed at an approximate ' depth of 2.0 to 3.6 ft below egs. Based on information from the USDA -SCS, the surficial shallow geology of the project site is dominated by Tavares soils and Urban land, 0 to 5 percent slopes (Map Unit "29 ") (refer to Figure 2 for USDA -SCS Soil Survey Map). The ' published Seasonal High Water Level (SHWL) for these soils is approximately 57 in. Based on the field exploration program ASC estimates the seasonal high water level to be approximately 42 in. below egs. Fluctuation in any ground -water level should be expected due to seasonal climatic changes, construction activity, development activities, rainfall variations, surface -water runoff, and other site specific factors. Since ground -water level variations are anticipated, design drawings and specifications should accommodate such possibilities and construction planning should be based on the assumption that variations will occur. ' 3.3 Subsurface Soil Conditions General subsurface soil conditions at boring locations on the project site are described below, from the egs to the termination depth of the borings (refer to Figure 3 for Project Layout and Test Location Plan). ► Subsoils generally consist of loose to medium dense silty sand with shell (SM -SH), underlain by very loose to very dense poorly - graded sand with silt (SP -SM), and very loose to dense poorly - graded sand (SP) from the egs to boring termination depths of approximately 10.0 ft below egs. Detailed descriptions of materials encountered in each of the borings are included in the boring logs presented in Figure 4. 4.0 OBSERVATIONS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS Based on current conditions as well as data obtained during the field exploration and laboratory testing program for this project, observations and conclusions are presented below. r4.1 Site Preparation, Fill Placement, and Inspection ► All parking and paved areas, including 5.0 -ft outside their limits, should be stripped, excavated, and undercut of all obstructions, topsoil, and ' ► All stripped or undercut areas should be proof - rolled with appropriate compaction equipment for site and soil conditions. This would typically consist of a vibratory drum type compactor such as Dynapac CA -15 (or engineer approved alternate) for sandy soils. The moisture content should be adjusted as necessary to aid compaction efforts. P. Care should be taken to avoid damage to any nearby or adjacent structures while compaction operations are ongoing. Prior to initiating compaction operations occupants of nearby or adjacent structures should be notified and the existing condition's of the structures should be documented with photographs and survey (if deemed necessary). Compaction should cease if deemed potentially detrimental to nearby or adjacent structures and ASC should be contacted immediately. ► It is recommended a vibratory roller maintain a minimum separation of 35- ft from existing structures. The existing two -story structure was observed to be very close to the southern boundary of the proposed parking lot. ASC recommends that a vibration monitoring device be placed to monitor the vibrations and avoid any potential damage to the existing structure. Within this zone use of a track - mounted bulldozer or a vibratory roller operating in a static mode is recommended. ► In any areas observed to be "yielding" or "pumping" during compaction ' operations, Localized cuts or trenches may be made to evaluate the conditions of the soils. ► As indicated above, localized unstable areas or areas containing organics /roots or other deleterious materials discovered during stripping and compaction may require excavation and backfilling. An ASC representative should be present during the proof - rolling and compaction operations. 5 Mr. Trevor Howard ASC geosciences, inc. Howard Civil Engineering, LLC 6 March 2008 In -Field Permeability Testing, Geotechnical Exploration,: and Engineering Consultation Services Report Proposed Parking Lot 1573 South Fort Harrison Avenue Clearwater, Pinellas County, Florida ASC Project No. 08T2003 ASC Document No. 080046L ' other organic or deleterious materials. In localized areas where organics /roots or other deleterious materials extend to greater depths, further excavation and backfilling may become necessary. Fill should not be placed until the excavated surface has been inspected by an ASC ' representative and approved for compaction and placement of structural backfill operations. Due to the presence of a relatively shallow water table, some dewatering and /or sump pumping may become necessary ' during excavation operations. ' ► All stripped or undercut areas should be proof - rolled with appropriate compaction equipment for site and soil conditions. This would typically consist of a vibratory drum type compactor such as Dynapac CA -15 (or engineer approved alternate) for sandy soils. The moisture content should be adjusted as necessary to aid compaction efforts. P. Care should be taken to avoid damage to any nearby or adjacent structures while compaction operations are ongoing. Prior to initiating compaction operations occupants of nearby or adjacent structures should be notified and the existing condition's of the structures should be documented with photographs and survey (if deemed necessary). Compaction should cease if deemed potentially detrimental to nearby or adjacent structures and ASC should be contacted immediately. ► It is recommended a vibratory roller maintain a minimum separation of 35- ft from existing structures. The existing two -story structure was observed to be very close to the southern boundary of the proposed parking lot. ASC recommends that a vibration monitoring device be placed to monitor the vibrations and avoid any potential damage to the existing structure. Within this zone use of a track - mounted bulldozer or a vibratory roller operating in a static mode is recommended. ► In any areas observed to be "yielding" or "pumping" during compaction ' operations, Localized cuts or trenches may be made to evaluate the conditions of the soils. ► As indicated above, localized unstable areas or areas containing organics /roots or other deleterious materials discovered during stripping and compaction may require excavation and backfilling. An ASC representative should be present during the proof - rolling and compaction operations. 5 1 0 . 0 Mr. Trevor Howard ASC geosciences, inc. Howard Civil Engineering, LLC 6 March 2008 In -Field Permeability Testing, Geotechnical Exploration, and Engineering Consultation Services Report Proposed Parking Lot 1573 South Fort Harrison Avenue Clearwater, Pinellas County, Florida ASC Project No. 08T2003 ASC Document No. 080046L ' 4.2 Ground -Water Control Depending on the elevations for the proposed parking and paved areas, excavations to achieve the required compaction for the soils, as recommended in Section 4.1, may be below or very close (less than 1.0 -ft) to the existing water table. Therefore, dewatering may be required during construction. ► The method of dewatering excavations will depend on several factors, including localized soil conditions encountered, time of year performed, size of open excavation, and the length of time the excavation is left open, to name just a few factors. As a result, it is our opinion that the contractor not be limited to specific dewatering methods. Rather the contractor should be able to select the dewatering methods that will achieve the desired objectives (maintaining a dry condition at the bottom of excavation during installation of structures and preparation of stable ' bearing material, etc.) 4.3 Pavement Areas ' 4.3.1 General A rigid or flexible pavement section could be used on this project. Flexible pavement combines the strength and durability of several layer components to produce an appropriate and cost - effective combination of available construction materials. Concrete pavement has the advantage of the ability to "bridge" over isolated soft areas, and it typically has a longer service life than asphalt pavement. Disadvantages of rigid pavement include an initial higher cost and more difficult patching of distressed areas than occurs with flexible pavement. A flexible pavement is considered more efficient. A discussion of ' flexible pavements is, therefore, presented below. 4.3.2 Asphalt (Flexible) Pavements 4.3.2.1 Standard Duty versus Heavy Duty 1 Standard Duty pavement areas are defined as having car and pickup truck loading conditions. Heavy Duty pavement areas are defined as having delivery, storage, and garbage truck loading conditions along with service drives. N 0 0 1 THICKNESS PAVEMENT LAYER Mr. Trevor Howard ASC geosciences, inc. Asphalt Wearing Surface Howard Civil Engineering, LLC In -Field Permeability Testing, Geotechnical Exploration, 6 March 2008 and Engineering Consultation Services Report FDOT Type S -1 or S -III Proposed Parking Lot Density 1 1573 South Fort Harrison Avenue Clearwater, Pinellas County, Florida 100% Modified Proctor max dry ASC Project No. 08T2003 Concrete Base Course ASC Document No. 080046L density, LBR > 100 1 The pavement recommendations detailed below are based upon local experience with similar pavement conditions to those proposed and upon Florida Department of Transportation guidelines. Certainly, no detriment will be realized in constructing the pavements to thicker sections; however, the recommendations provided herein will 1 produce acceptable, durable pavements at a cost savings. 1 The following design assumptions are noted: 1. The 12 -in. of subgrade soils below the base course are compacted to 1 98 percent of the maximum dry density determined from 1557, Test Method for Compaction Characteristics Using ASTM D Modified Effort and with a design LBR value of 40 (after stabilization). 2. A 20 year design life. 3. Terminal serviceability index (Pt) of 2. 4. Reliability of 85 percent, and total equivalent 18 -kip single axle loads (E,eSAL) of 14,600. Based on these assumptions, the following design is recommended for a Standard Duty asphalt pavement: Making the same assumptions and with total equivalent 18 -kip single axle loads (E18SAL) of 51,100, the following design is recommended for a Heavy Duty asphalt pavement: 7 THICKNESS PAVEMENT LAYER (in.) MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS Asphalt Wearing Surface 95% Laboratory Marshall 1.5 min. FDOT Type S -1 or S -III Density Limerock or Crushed 100% Modified Proctor max dry 6.0 min. Concrete Base Course density, LBR > 100 Making the same assumptions and with total equivalent 18 -kip single axle loads (E18SAL) of 51,100, the following design is recommended for a Heavy Duty asphalt pavement: 7 1 THICKNESS Mr. Trevor Howard (in.) Howard Civil Engineering, LLC In -Field Permeability Testing, Geotechnical Exploration, Asphalt Wearing Surface and Engineering Consultation Services Report 95% Laboratory Marshall Proposed Parking Lot 2.0 min. 1573 South Fort Harrison Avenue FDOT Type S -I or S -III Clearwater, Pinellas County, Florida Density ASC Project No. 08T2003 ASC Document No. 080046L 1 1 ASC geosciences, inc. 6 March 2008 For alternate cases when total equivalent 18 -kip single axle loads (EtaSAL) equal 335,800, the limerock or crushed concrete base course can be increased to 12 -in. from 8 -in. 4.3.2.2 Stabilized Subgrade It is recommended that subgrade materials be compacted in place according to requirements detailed in previous sections of this report. For the current project a minimum of 12 -in. of subgrade materials should be stabilized to a minimum Limerock Bearing Ratio (LBR) of 40 percent as specified by the Florida Department of Transportation requirements for Type B Stabilized Subgrade, and also be compacted to 98 percent of the maximum dry density determined from ASTM D 1557, Test Method for Compaction Characteristics Using Modified Effort. The stabilized subgrade can be imported material such as limerock. If a blend is proposed, it is recommended that a mix design be performed to find the optimum mix proportions. The primary function of the stabilized subgrade beneath the base course is to provide a ' stable and firm subgrade so that limerock can be properly and uniformly placed. Depending on the soil type, the subgrade material may have sufficient stability to provide the needed support without additional stabilizing material. In most cases, sands with a fine fraction or clay alone may exhibit sufficient stability and may not require any additional ' stabilizing material. Conversely, relatively "clean" sands would not provide sufficient stability in order to adequately construct a limerock base course. ASC should review the exposed soils to evaluate their suitability and whether additional stabilization will be required beneath the base course. u 1 1 8 THICKNESS PAVEMENT LAYER (in.) MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS Asphalt Wearing Surface 95% Laboratory Marshall 2.0 min. FDOT Type S -I or S -III Density Limerock or Crushed 100% Modified Proctor max dry 8.0 min. Concrete Base Course density, LBR > 100 For alternate cases when total equivalent 18 -kip single axle loads (EtaSAL) equal 335,800, the limerock or crushed concrete base course can be increased to 12 -in. from 8 -in. 4.3.2.2 Stabilized Subgrade It is recommended that subgrade materials be compacted in place according to requirements detailed in previous sections of this report. For the current project a minimum of 12 -in. of subgrade materials should be stabilized to a minimum Limerock Bearing Ratio (LBR) of 40 percent as specified by the Florida Department of Transportation requirements for Type B Stabilized Subgrade, and also be compacted to 98 percent of the maximum dry density determined from ASTM D 1557, Test Method for Compaction Characteristics Using Modified Effort. The stabilized subgrade can be imported material such as limerock. If a blend is proposed, it is recommended that a mix design be performed to find the optimum mix proportions. The primary function of the stabilized subgrade beneath the base course is to provide a ' stable and firm subgrade so that limerock can be properly and uniformly placed. Depending on the soil type, the subgrade material may have sufficient stability to provide the needed support without additional stabilizing material. In most cases, sands with a fine fraction or clay alone may exhibit sufficient stability and may not require any additional ' stabilizing material. Conversely, relatively "clean" sands would not provide sufficient stability in order to adequately construct a limerock base course. ASC should review the exposed soils to evaluate their suitability and whether additional stabilization will be required beneath the base course. u 1 1 8 Mr. Trevor Howard ASC geosciences, inc. Howard Civil Engineering, LLC 6 March 2008 In -Field Permeability Testing, Geotechnical Exploration, and Engineering Consultation Services Report Proposed Parking Lot 1573 South Fort Harrison Avenue Clearwater, Pinellas County, Florida ASC Project No. 08T2003 ASC Document No. 080046L 4.3.2.3 Base Course It is recommended that the base course consist of limerock or crushed concrete. The base course should have a minimum LBR of 100 and should be compacted to 100 percent of the maximum dry density determined from ASTM D 1557, Test Method for Compaction Characteristics Using Modified Effort. ' 4.3.2.4 Wearing Surface i 1 The wearing surface should consist of FDOT Type S asphaltic concrete having a minimum Marshall stability of 1,500 -lbs. Specific requirements for Type S asphaltic concrete wearing surface are outlined in FDOT specifications. After placement and field compaction, the wearing surface should be cored to evaluate the material thickness as well as to perform laboratory density. Cores should be obtained at a frequency of at least one core per 3,000 sq ft of placed pavement or a minimum of 2 cores per each day of production. 4.3.3 Effects of Ground -Water A critical influence on the performance of pavements in Florida is the relationship between the pavement subgrade and the SHWL. Many roadways and parking areas exhibit failure due to the deterioration of the base and base /surface course bond. It is recommended, therefore, that the pavement subgrade be separated from the SHWL by at least 18 -in. 4.3.4 Curbing Curbing around landscaped areas adjacent to parking lots and driveways should be constructed with full -depth curb sections. Use of extruded curb sections which lie directly on top of the finished asphalt level, or eliminating curbing entirely, can allow migration of surface water and irrigation water from landscape areas to the interface between the asphalt and base. This migration of water, in turn, often causes separation of the wearing surface from the base and subsequent rippling and pavement deterioration. 4.3.5 Construction Traffic Light duty roadways and incomplete pavement sections will not perform satisfactorily under construction traffic loadings. It is recommended that construction traffic be re- routed away from these roadways. Alternately, the pavement section should be designed for these loading conditions from construction traffic. 0 5.0 CONSTRUCTION CONSIDERATIONS Due to ASCs familiarity with the site subsurface conditions, it is recommended that ASC be retained to provide and perform the engineering and quality control testing services during the construction phase of the project. The services to be provided by ASC include: ► monitoring excavations as well as placement and testing of engineered and compacted fill; and P. general quality control testing during construction. A sound geotechnical engineering evaluation does not end with the final design. Design is an ongoing process throughout construction. Because of ASC's familiarity with the project site, its condition as related to geotechnical design elements, and the intent of the engineering design, we are most qualified to address issues during construction as well as to evaluate problems which may arise during construction. 6.0 LIMITATIONS 6.1 General This geotechnical engineering services report has been prepared solely for the exclusive use of the Client, Howard Civil Engineering, LLC, in accordance with generally accepted geotechnical engineering standards. No other warranty is expressed nor implied. It should 10 Depth of Depth of Mr. Trevor Howard ASC geosciences, inc. Kh Howard Civil Engineering, LLC 6 March 2008 ' In -Field Permeability Testing, Geotechnical Exploration, and Engineering Consultation Services Report Test Kh Proposed Parking Lot ' 1573 South Fort Harrison Avenue Clearwater, Pinellas County, Florida (in /hr) ASC Project No. 08T2003 (in /hr) ASC Document No. 080046L 4.4 Pond Areas (ft) Field permeability tests consisting of 2 vertical and 2 horizontal tests were performed (ft) within the proposed pond areas. The tests were performed to assess general in -situ 0.25 vertical and horizontal flowrate information. The location of the tests is shown in Figure 3. 0.01 The data from the field tests is summarized in the table below. 5.0 CONSTRUCTION CONSIDERATIONS Due to ASCs familiarity with the site subsurface conditions, it is recommended that ASC be retained to provide and perform the engineering and quality control testing services during the construction phase of the project. The services to be provided by ASC include: ► monitoring excavations as well as placement and testing of engineered and compacted fill; and P. general quality control testing during construction. A sound geotechnical engineering evaluation does not end with the final design. Design is an ongoing process throughout construction. Because of ASC's familiarity with the project site, its condition as related to geotechnical design elements, and the intent of the engineering design, we are most qualified to address issues during construction as well as to evaluate problems which may arise during construction. 6.0 LIMITATIONS 6.1 General This geotechnical engineering services report has been prepared solely for the exclusive use of the Client, Howard Civil Engineering, LLC, in accordance with generally accepted geotechnical engineering standards. No other warranty is expressed nor implied. It should 10 Depth of Depth of Permeability Kh KV Test Kh Test K„ Test No. (in /hr) (in /hr) (ft) (ft) FH -1 0.25 3.0 0.01 2.0 FH -2 0.29 3.0 0.5 2.0 5.0 CONSTRUCTION CONSIDERATIONS Due to ASCs familiarity with the site subsurface conditions, it is recommended that ASC be retained to provide and perform the engineering and quality control testing services during the construction phase of the project. The services to be provided by ASC include: ► monitoring excavations as well as placement and testing of engineered and compacted fill; and P. general quality control testing during construction. A sound geotechnical engineering evaluation does not end with the final design. Design is an ongoing process throughout construction. Because of ASC's familiarity with the project site, its condition as related to geotechnical design elements, and the intent of the engineering design, we are most qualified to address issues during construction as well as to evaluate problems which may arise during construction. 6.0 LIMITATIONS 6.1 General This geotechnical engineering services report has been prepared solely for the exclusive use of the Client, Howard Civil Engineering, LLC, in accordance with generally accepted geotechnical engineering standards. No other warranty is expressed nor implied. It should 10 1 0 1 Mr. Trevor Howard ASC geosciences, inc. Howard Civil Engineering, LLC 6 March 2008 In -Field Permeability Testing, Geotechnical Exploration, and Engineering Consultation Services Report Proposed Parking Lot 1573 South Fort Harrison Avenue Clearwater, Pinellas County, Florida ASC Project No. 08T2003 ASC Document No. 080046L be noted that the information presented in this report addresses only soils and deposits normally influenced by the proposed construction. Other conditions may exist which were not detected or were not made known to ASC. No unusual subsurface conditions were ' encountered within the exploration depth of the borings. For additional reference describing the scope and limitations of this project, please review the document enclosed in Appendix A entitled Important Information About Your Geotechnical Engineering Report prepared by the American Society of Foundation Engineers (ASFE). 6.2 Scope of Services This report has been prepared to aid in the evaluation of subsurface conditions only at the locations of test borings illustrated in Figure 3. The scope of services is limited to the specific project and location described herein, and the description of the project represents ASC's understanding of significant project aspects related to soil characteristics. In the ' event that any changes in the design or location of the structure as outlined in the report are planned, ASC must be informed so that the changes can be reviewed and the observation, comments, and conclusions of this report modified or approved in writing. ' Any conclusions or recommendations made by others based on the data contained herein are not the responsibility of ASC, unless we are given the opportunity to review those conclusions and recommendations. ' 6.3 Changed Conditions ' The information submitted in this report is based upon the data obtained from borings performed at locations indicated in the Project Layout and Test Location Plan and from any other information discussed in this report. The report does not reflect any variations which occur between these borings. In the performance of subsurface exploration, specific ' information is obtained at specific locations at specific times. However, it is known that site and subsurface conditions can change with time and under anthropologic influences. Additionally, variations in soil, rock, and ground -water conditions exist on most sites 1 between boring locations. The nature and extent of the variations may not become evident until construction. If variations then appear, it will be necessary to re- evaluate the recommendations of this report after performing on -site observations during the construction period and noting the characteristics of any variations. It is the responsibility of the Client to see that the recommendations in this report are ' brought to the attention of all concerned parties. Because of the possibility of 11 Mr. Trevor Howard ASC geosciences, inc. Howard Civil Engineering, LLC 6 March 2008 In -Field Permeability Testing, Geotechnical Exploration, and Engineering Consultation Services Report Proposed Parking Lot 1573 South Fort Harrison Avenue Clearwater, Pinellas County, Florida ASC Project No. 08T2003 ASC Document No. 080046L unanticipated subsurface conditions occurring, it is recommended that a "changed condition" clause be provided in contracts with the general contractor and with subcontractors involved in foundations or earthwork construction. Furthermore, it is ' recommended that ASC be retained to review the site preparation and foundation phases of construction. Otherwise, no responsibility for construction compliance with the design concepts, plans, specifications, and recommendations presented herein can be assumed. 6.4 Reproduction ' The reproduction of any portion of this report in plans or other engineering documents supplied to parties other than the Client or assigned parties must bear the language indicating that the information contained in the report is for general information only, and that neither the Client nor ASC are liable to such parties. 7.0 REFERENCES IInternet: http : / /websoilsurvey.nres.usda.gov /app /WebSoilSurvey.asp II 0 12 cleaf 7 177- la n d freetM 03T2003, MCI air 41 J 4t--, Al a c UM F;7— t Es. . d -kf '� �Fiarbol BlAs A-1 I1 Ditwl .11316hr. FY z �77 nzl,� M T, lei 9"t V W —Wyk rx j f Lj I'V - it 15, fu 4 Ef. 4 .11 pow R 70 �9 p 7. e, M R M1 wm Y w Owl .-" -_ 4..—, z 4... ;". -r��`�,. — W4NT,M&E. Z7 77777771 4 D ELI EAA MANOR, 0, "Z :7� ffir �qj - lie I j mgg, 'go-g. W'.4041 WORM f OR tam asoI l SO; ism" My Sir - Tt�.......... ME Em" IS" j FIN 'M AMIN& 14V .11 . . . . . . . . . \ SB- \ SS -6+ y- 4 \ \ \ SB -5 -' \ Ti SB-3 T cNSOn Avenue 58.1 L� rr'onR"tQSnMTOC n. e =f231'mn epR iF'� Bormq- vrrt- t,ac- fiiyrmnr- 'mm�wr ^rm Plon 1 3 1 BOB161G44o.: -1 DORNG No.: 2 D7Mf: 3)6 ft Wit )B2- N 05E N/A M. N/A DATE 02f25J08 DATE 02/ZSJDB 0 N M. N/A N 0 N/A M -SN W111ty $and -SM Po (ly Graded Sand SM -SH S Sond 20 N -$N s ty Sand 0 9 - D WTta I1 gro - n -2 5E, -SM Pootly Graded Sand 1 lock, 1 ', 1 rMlm aen,e. 1_ ie. i (,I,.t, rgMc) (sl ]ImT'ol4a�c) -4 .. _ Boa ` SP-SM 11 ". Ny Graded $and 54 Graded Sand - black lD w /Sill -4 .. :: (troce2rge6as) black, .et. - e Mm sera, 7 SP ry dense v v SP ft rMyy��Gra�Eed Sono ! Boo traded sane `. 15 g 63 ':: ': black -to 11 '' ooryL Graded Sand block very donee iD V ' i2 111M.— d—, .... ...: nTff— derv. 13 .... 21 SP E I, n ed Bof aled at I ft�D pth al 1�tMepth 8081MC -ft.: 8-3 8081NC-ft.: -4 LIT: 30 tt LIf: 21 It 05E N/A M. N/A DATE 02/25708 DATE, 02/2'708 N M. N/A N 0 N/A -SM Po (ly Graded Sand DATE: 02/25708 DATE N -$N s ty Sand 0 9 N /¢yS,,,IL I1 Shen 5E, -SM Pootly Graded Sand -Iy Bo (ly Graded Sand -2..- W JPs, ( t) - eoo o --., t mor n 4 � 2 lel-to - le - TREE STUMPS - 17 6 4 Idoee� 21 - a a� dense, - (,Igrrc7v fiFC) -4 .. :: (troce2rge6as) (trace �rgerro) 7 SP (. ot) I SP SP ft rMyy��Gra�Eed Sono _ SP 4 g d k E7gvi . y Graded Sane 11 '' ooryL Graded Sand block rlTel! se oe ry u d e m e V ' i2 111M.— d—, br doi`R-roWw 11 lL TD n C' SP dense - sense '�. .' Nrq„e 10 t6 sense 1 . liof nplh Bo noted Bof 14 - of ll7 fT�U l 10 IT�Deplh I 1 ft D plh t 12 -... 35 -.... -1 Bpr noted B noted dl lU tl�Uepth of 1 IT�DepU -15L r. -� " ,ry El - LISTIC SA-1 Illillll ®` p �nlll�ilu BO81NG-ffd.: � fit � 20 ~M 218 Il G 316 Mr. it ig S1-1 fn � -.e.,., M. N/A M. N/A M. N/A DATE 8 DATE: 02/25708 DATE 02125'708 0 N N N :. SP - Pogrly Graded d 5E, -SM Pootly Graded Sand -Iy Bo (ly Graded Sand -2..- W JPs, ( t) - eoo o --., t mor n 4 � wo m k n t lel-to - le - TREE STUMPS - 17 pel, 4 ry e. a = Ibosr -to (,Igrrc7v fiFC) -4 .. 7 SP (. ot) I 4 SP ft rMyy��Gra�Eed Sono _ Por0ly Graded Sond d k E7gvi . m p1. Ido,e-tc rlTel! se oe ry u d e m e V ' i2 111M.— d—, 11 SP Poq9.�.IIy Crad,d Sond 8 '�. .' Nrq„e 10 1 . liof nplh Bo noted Bof noted - of ll7 fT�U l 10 IT�Deplh I 1 ft D plh -15 FIOI < r...AAO,ne,e„J Cleorwater, Avenue 'Ft.. do -15 d V -15 ,D r. -� " ,ry El - LISTIC SA-1 Illillll ®` p �nlll�ilu o ~M iF/. IRIS I• % �Ilill • ig S1-1 fn � -.e.,., REbUWEJ) SI SPT N -VALUE (b'%Z , per N) ,ry 0 To m e very tlen >e n - n 50 mnCTrt»rr[aFl I -. caoaNa N G OaND cs cxoaND N STAIN (N BLO6 2R s T WWRRWEEIGHHTT cwt Io�. water loble aoHTERCn IRUeED Ira+ RESISTANCE MC 3"AT ORE -Cp LL PL PI E,ING N 200 ENT 44 I. CASING M rwE- ou+Hi: nr+c-zoo u n„eI emm.,) I T. BwC!i -SHO E AT THE TIME WARRANTY AS TD 5, STRATA 5 IS E%PRESSE GUARANTEE - UK CWIBAGi-R-DF R REFER-TD BROJECT-CUDOT-AMU TE57 LoC n mu ,e.rw. 4 g, LLC 0 Mr. Trevor Howard Howard Civil Engineering, LLC In -Field Permeability Testing, Geotechnical Exploration, and Engineering Consultation Services Report Proposed Parking Lot 1573 South Fort Harrison Avenue Clearwater, Pinellas County, Florida ASC Project No. 08T2003 ASC Document No. 080046L APPENDIX A • ASC geosciences, inc. 6 March 2008 Important Information About Your Geotechnical Engineering Report by ASFE t 1 �l 1 J 0 0 0 eolechnical Engineering Repop Geotechnical Services Are Performed for Specific Purposes, Persons, and Projects Geotechnical engineers structure their services to meet the spe- cific needs of their clients. A:geotechnical engineering study con- ducted for a civil engineer may not fulfill the needs of a construc- tion contractor or even another civil engineer. Because each gent- echnical engineering study is unique, each geotechnical engi- neering report is unique, prepared solely for the client. No one except you should rely on your geotechnical engineering report without first conferring with the geotechnical engineer who pre- pared it. And no one —not even you - -should apply the report for any purpose or project except the one originally contemplated. A Geotpchnicai Engineering Report Is Based on A Unique Set of Project - Specific Factors Geotechnical engineers consider a number of unique, project -spe- cific factors when establishing the scope of a. study. Typical factors include: the client's' goals, objectives, and risk management pref- erences: the general nature of the structurer involved, its size, and configuration; the location. of the structure on the site; and other planned or existing site improvements, such as access roads, parking lots, and underground utilities. unless the geotechnical engineer who conducted the study specifically indicates other- wise, do not rely on a geotechnical engineeringfeport that was: • not prepared for you, • not prepared for your project, • not prepared for the specific site explored, or • completed before important project changes were made. Typical changes that can erode the reliability of an existing geotechnical engineering report include those that affect: • the function of the proposed structure, as when it's changed from a parking garage to an office building, or from a light industrial plant to a refrigerated warehouse, • elevation, configuration, location, orientation, or weight of the proposed structure, • composition of the design team, or • project ownership. As a general rule, always inform your geotechnical engineer of project changes —even minor ones —and request an assessment of their impact. Geotechnical engineers cannot accept responsibility or liability for problems that occur because their reports do not consider developments of which they were not informed. Subsurface Conditions Can Change A geotechnical engineering report is based on conditions that existed at the time the study was performed. Do not rely on a geotechnical engineering report whose adequacy may have been affected by: the passage of time; by man -made events, such as construction on or adjacent to the site; or by natural events, such as. floods, earthquakes, or groundwater fluctua- tions. Always contact the geotechnical engineer before apply- ing the report to determine if it is still reliable. A minor amount of additional testing or analysis could prevent major problems. Most Geotechnical Findings Are Professional Opinions Site exploration identifies subsurface conditions only at those points where subsurface tests are conducted or samples are taken. Geotechnical engineers review field and laboratory data and then apply their professional judgment to render an opinion about subsurface conditions throughout the site. Actual sub- surface conditions may differ— sometimes significantly -from those indicated in your report. Retaining the geotechnical engi- neer who developed your report to provide construction obser- vation is the most effective method of managing the risks asso- ciated with unanticipated conditions. 1 r i A Report's Recommendations Are Not Rnal Do not overrely on the construction recommendations included in your report. Those recommendations, are not final, because . geotechnical engineers develop them principally from judgment and opinion. Geotechnical engineers can finalize their recom- mendations only by observing actual subsurface conditions revealed during construction. The geotechnical engineer who developed your report cannot assume responsibility or liability for the report's recommendations if that engineer does not perform construction observation. A Geotechnical Engineering Report Is Subject To Misinterpretation Other design team members' misinterpretation of geotechnical engineering reports has resulted in costly problems. Lower that risk by having your geotechnical engineer confer with appropriate members of the design team after submitting the report. Also retain your geotechnical engineer to review perti- nent elements of the design team's plans and specifications. Contractors can also misinterpret a geotechnical engineering report. Reduce that risk by having your geotechnical engineer participate in prebid and preconstruction conferences, and by providing :construction observation. Do Not Redraw the Engineer's logs Geotechnical engineers prepare final boring and testing logs based upon their interpretation of field logs and laboratory data. To prevent errors or omissions, the logs included in a geotechnical engineering report should never be redrawn for inclusion in architectural or other design drawings, Only photo- graphic or electronic reproduction is acceptable, but recognize that separating logs from the report can elevate risk. Give Contractors a Complete Report and Guidance Some owners and design professionals mistakenly believe they can make contractors liable for unanticipated subsurface condi- tions by limiting what they provide for bid preparation. To help prevent costly problems, give contractors the complete geotech- nical engineering report, but preface it with a clearly written let- ter of transmittal. in that letter, advise contractors that the report was not prepared for purposes of bid development and that the report's accuracy is limited; encourage them to confer with the geotechnical engineer who prepared the report (a modest fee may be required) and /or to conduct additional study to obtain the specific types of information they need or prefer. A prebid conference can also be valuable. Be sure contractors have suffi- cient time to perform additional study. Only then might you be in a position to give contractors the best information available to you, while requiring them to at least share some of the financial responsibilities stemming from unanticipated conditions. Read Responsibility Provisions Closely Some clients, design professionals, and contractors do not recognize that geotechnical engineering is far less exact than other engineering disciplines. This lack of understanding has created unrealistic expectations that have led to disappoint- ments, claims, and disputes. To help reduce such risks, geot- echnical engineers commonly include a variety of explanatory provisions in their reports. Sometimes labeled "limitations ", many of these provisions indicate where geotechnical engi- neers responsibilities begin and end, to 'help others recognize their own responsibilities and risks. Read these provisions closely, Ask questions. Your geotechnical engineer should respond fully and frankly. Geoenvironmental Concerns Are Not Covered The equipment, techniques, and personnel used to perform a geoenvironmental study differ significantly from those used to perform a geotechnical study. For that reason, a geotechnical engineering report does not usually relate any geoenvironmen- tal findings, conclusions, or recommendations; e.g., about the likelihood of encountering. underground storage. tanks or regu- fated contaminants. Unanticipated environmental problems have led to numerous project failures. If you have not yet obtained your own geoenvironmental information, ask your geotechnical consultant for risk management guidance. Do not rely on an environmental report prepared for someone else. Rely on Your Geotechnical Engineer for Additional Assistance Membership in ASFE exposes geotechnical engineers to a wide array of risk management techniques that can be of genuine ben - efit.for everyone involved with a construction project. Confer with your ASFE-member geotechnical engineer for more information. FEIPROFESSIONAL N HE GEOSCIENCES 8811 Colesville Road Suite G106 Silver Spring, MD 20910 Telephone: 301 -565 -2733 Facsimile: 301 -589 -2017 email: info@asfe.org www.asfe.org copyright 1998 by A$FE. Inc. Unless ASFE grants written permission to do so, duplication of this document by:any means whatsoever is expressly prohibited. Reuse of the wording in this document, in whole or in part. also is expressly prohibited. and may be done only with the express permission of ASFE or for purposes of review or scholarly research. IIGER06983.6M ' OPERATICOAND MAINTENANCE INSIDUCTIONS Stormwater Management Systems should be inspected on a routine basis to ensure that they are functioning properly. Inspections should be performed on a monthly and semi- annual basis following major storms. Systems that incorporate percolation are most critical since poor maintenance practices can soon render them ineffective. Records should be kept on all maintenance operations to help plan future work and identify facilities requiring attention. ' Considerable damage, as well as loss of structures and effective use of the stormwater facilities can result from a failure to protect and maintain the drainage systems. Providing maintenance in a timely manner often saves costly repair jobs when the unusual storms occur. Remember, the SWFWMD permit dictates that the system must be maintained and that the owner is responsible for system maintenance. ' A. GENERAL 0 t C 1 J Normal maintenance requirements are as follows: a. Retention areas and swales should be mowed at regular intervals. All clippings should be picked up and any accumulated debris should be removed. b. Sod should be routinely thatched. C. The bottom area of dry basins should be periodically broken with a disk to maintain design percolation rate. d. Sod cover on slopes and embankments should be inspected and repaired or replaced as necessary. e. Periodically, following a storm event, the outfall structure should be inspected to check that the orifice or weir is not clogged and is flowing at a substantial rate. f. The discharge pipe(s) should be visually inspected to determine if the pipe(s) require cleaning. All debris found in the pipe should be removed. g. Inlet structures should be inspected after each storm. All debris accumulated in the sump or on the grate should be removed. h. Outlets should be inspected for clogging and erosion. i. Berms and other structures should be inspected for breaks. Repairs, if necessary, should be performed immediately. B. CATCH BASINS Catch basins should be inspected after major storms and should be cleaned as often as needed. Various techniques and equipment are available for maintenance of catch basins. Filter bags can be used in catch basins at street grade to reduce the frequency of cleaning catch basins and outfall pipes. C. LITTORAL ZONES (For Wet Detention Systems) The littoral shelf shall be maintained as follows: Howard Civil Engineering, LL 1601 3rd Sheet South - Suite A St Petersburg, FL 33701 Ofte (727) 490 -1784 (Fax) 727 - 490 -1787 www.Howard0vilEngineering.com 1. Wetland topsoil, contai�a suitable seed source, shall be spreilver the littoral zone ' control elevation out to the waterward extent of the shelf, with a minimum from the cot , thickness of four inches. 2. Littoral vegetation will become established via natural recruitment. 3. All desirable vegetation that becomes established in the littoral area must be maintained. ' 4. Nuisance /invasive exotic species (e.g., cattails) should be removed periodically. The owner should consult the water management district prior to undertaking this activity. D. UNDERDRAINS AND EFFLUENT FILTERS Underdrains and effluent filtration systems should be periodically inspected to assure that they are functioning as designed. Failure to effectively maintain these systems will result in insufficient drawdown of detained stormwater runoff after rainfall events. The filter media should be routinely inspected for accumulation of excess debris and silt. Debris should be removed immediately following storm events. ' Effluent filters are designed such that all detained runoff should discharge from the basin within a 36 -hour period. Observations should be made periodically to verify that the filter is passing the runoff within the design time frame. Runoff remaining in the basin longer than 72 hours is ' indicative of a clogged or silt laden filter. Should this event occur, the filter should be thoroughly backwashed with clean water to remove silt and other fines from the media. If backwashing does not remedy the situation, the media may need to be replaced. The owner should retain a qualified contractor and should consult with the engineer prior to replacing filter media. E. DRY BOTTOM RETENTION SYSTEM 7 u 1 1 The retention area must become dry within 72 hours after a rainfall event. If the retention area is regularly wet, it is out of compliance with the permitted design, and the pond bottom must be scarified, or the bottom foot or so replaced with clean sands, to ensure that the permitted percolation rate is maintained.. F. METHODS AND EQUIPMENT FOR SYSTEM MAINTENANCE Various types of equipment are commercially available for maintenance of stormwater management systems. The most frequently used equipment and techniques are listed below: Vacuum Pump This device is normally used to remove sediment from sumps and pipes. The equipment for this system is generally mounted on a vehicle. It requires a 200 to 300 gallon (0.757 to 1.136 m ^3) holding tank and a vacuum pump that has a 10 -inch (254 mm) diameter flexible hose with a serrated metal end for breaking up cake sediment. A two -man crew can clean a catch basin in 5 to 10 minutes. This system can remove stones, bricks, leaves, litter, and sediment deposits. Normal working depth is 0 to 20 feet (0 to 6 m). Water Jet Sprat/ This equipment is generally mounted on a vehicle equipped with a high pressure pump and a 200 to 300 gallon (0.760 to 1.140 m^3) water supply. A 3 -inch (76 mm) flexible hose line with a metal nozzle directs jets of water to loosen debris in pipes or trenches. Normal length of hose is approximately 200 feet (61 m). This system should not be used to clean erodible trench walls. Howard Cnn1 Engineering, LL 1601 3rd Street South - Suite A St. Petersburg, FL 33701 Office (727) 490 -1784 (Fax) 727 - 490 -1787 www.HowardCivilEngineering.com Fire Hose Flushing This equipment consists of various fittings that can be placed on the end of a fire hose such as rotating nozzles, rotating cutter, etc. When this equipment is dragged through a pipe, it can be effective in removing light material from walls. Sewer Jet Flusher Sewer jet flushers are usually truck - mounted and consists of a large water tank of at least 1000 gallons (3.785 m 13), a triple action water pump capable of producing 1000 psi (6900 kN /m ^2) or ' more pressure, a gasoline motor to run the pump, a hose reel large enough for 500 feet (153 m) of 1 -inch (25 mm) inside diameter high pressure hose, and a hydraulic pump to operate the hose reel. In order to clean pipes properly, a minimum nozzle pressure of 600 psi (4140 kN/m . ^2) is ' required. All material is flushed ahead of the nozzle by spray action. This extremely mobile machine can be used for cleaning areas with light grease problems, sand and gravel infiltration, and for general cleaning. References ' Sewer Maintenance Manual Prepared by Municipal Engineers Association of Ontario for Ministry of the Environment, Ontario, Canada, March 1974. Smith, T.W., Peter, R.R., Smith, R.E., Shirley, E.C., 'Infiltration Drainage of Highway Surface Water", Transportation Laboratory, California Department of Transportation, Research Report M & R 632820 -1, August, 1969. t 1� Howard Civil Engineering, LLC 1601 3rd Street South - Suite A St. Petersburg, FL 33701 Office (727) 490 -1784 (Fax) 727 - 490 -1787 www.Howard0vilEngineering.com • � Page 1 of 1 Wells, Wayne From: Trevor Howard [trevor @howardengineering.net] Sent: Saturday, March 15, 2008 1:02 PM To: Wells, Wayne; Mike @HowardCivilEngineering.com Cc: wseifril@tampabay.rr.com Subject: Recorded deed.pdf Hello Mr. Wells, Attached is the recorded deed for the 1573 Ft. Harrison Project as sent to me by the new owner Thanks. Trevor Howard, P.E. HOWARD CIVIL ENGINEERING, LLC 1601 3rd St South Suite A St Petersburg FL 33701 Phone: 727 - 490 -1784 Fax: 727 - 490 -1787 Mobile: 727 - 481 -5049 httr): / /www.howardcivile_ggineerina.com 3/17/2008 Mar. 14. 21,108 0 1 F V, I H Il U CON SIKKilON INC TITLE AGENCY OF FLORIDA, INC. 19535 Wf BoWevard, Suite C Indian Shores, FL 33785 (727) 596-0700 • Fax (727) 59&2657 No. 4M N. fib DATZ 2008 PA" I OF PAGES EM j *, ' a FAX# 1�- TRIS DOCUKUM WAY XX PXTVZLZG=, MMOMMI, AM HMPT FRM DISCLOSM VNM.R APPLICAB= LAW. 17 YOU ARX NOT TU =MORD UMPI , PXAkn CA" VS MMTATUY AVD: RZTMM A= PAM 07:'TRXS VOCUUMM TU V8 18Y RROCUR MZXL. WX WILL RMOURS2 YM FOR POSTA02. =UM woz VMty XU=, If there are any problem during trarLfmission or if this lax vas received incox1plete, please call (727) $96-0700. ... ....... .. ... rq.41 a r 14. 20082 JAIPIA R�'"&w EIIFRIED CONSTRUCTION INC No. 4225 P. 3161 04 004M CLM P"U" 0FccWr OOWV MOMA Doc=ient Prepared' by a"" W*W#M ""Mm at 62AR Pm OFF %c ow. i6l" P& sw'ms KENNETH G. ARSENAULT, JR- oftTYWOMIMCORMW W.0 = AGENCY OF FLORIDA, INC. �O OW STAW. UV&4o 19535 GULF BLVD., SUITS C DMAN SNORM, FL 33785 Parcel # 21/29/15/00000144012000 He 0 09.90,52 illwl V-1VA, X "V-64 I#---f *91 6 THIS DMENTURE$'=de Us day of t*A 2oo8 bawan BELLEAIR POM INVESTMENTS, LLC, a Fladda limited Umobility Company, hem raft colW duo Gm*r. to 1573, LJ—C., a 121mida Lhrjtad _11*Hty Compay, he"Inafter oW led Ow Orsaw, haviqg the principal address of WITMOTH: That the Grantor, for and in considenitka of the sum of Ten DolUn ($10,00), and adw good and WuWo considerations, The mccipt and rafflaimyof which is hereby acknowledged, by +Asa pmmvs does gmn� bargain, scil, alien, crain, rcicasa, vrifow, wavey anti confmcm unto the Granw, all dw certain parcel of land lying and being irt the County of Pinellas, State of FWRID►, mm pa:ticuMy de=lvcd as follows. TW '3-Til -0 I'l 17415 SUBJECT TO TAXES FOR INE YEAR 2009 ANDSVDnQUHNT YEARS SUBJECT TO RESTRICTIONS AND RASM&"NTS OF RECORD. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the saw in fee simple fi=vct. anti *a Omar hereby wvmo= with Said Gmtcc 1ha ( he is lswfoUy seized of Said land to to* simple; ftt he has 9OW right and 12W&I authadty to idl w.W convgy said lout that he hereby (611y wxmts the title to said ImW and will Wad the sarm aping the lawful clgftm of Wt pcnom whomsoever; W that said land is free of all cw=�Mnces. IN WITNESS WHERRY, Gmtor has h=mto set Gmotm' hads aM seals the day and yen Ant above. Pne I on May, 14. 2008- j:GIPNI ,I�&EIFRIED CONSTRUCTION INC _727464103 k 4225 P. 4/161 MAO x�—�ww� vain' r,-1 — ------ Pagac2ow witacssil; BELLE AM POV Limited t4sWity LN The fbm ping in*unvntwm ac1m*wledVd1xfwc rwtMs '—U.--&Yof tbak '2008by ANGELO MAMOPOULM, as M&Wer of 81 AM POWT INVESTWNTS, LLC, a Florida Limited Liability Company, who pmduced-1435a &j�uidM0cA0(M. Nary Publio MY commissim wmires' ia.�._.14. 2008 - 3:j2PM.�..�1 Gt3'(RICIv� 1�l�► Via. URW 3 of .. Wi � #2:j�afs.,j f STATE OF FLORTDA P. 5/6X3 COUNTY QP PNELLAS The foregoing hutrumcat was acknow440Itfore YM this dsy at' , 2008 by THOMAS GOEBEL, as Mau&W f BELT�. PAIN' INVESTMENTS, LLC, a Florida Limited Liability Comp eed � � ' �' M. ld€ sifscatiorn ar-trum"z 4. ._ _... I R U _. �� r. 14. 2i�t)� 3 : �2�� • „�, �< C� .I ED CONSTRUCT IAN INC 727464 Via. 42.2 `4 LEGAL DESCRIPTION t:;KNIBIT Ile That part of the West 112 of the Southeast 1/4 di the Southeast 1/4 of esotion 21, Township 29 ft^ Rarve 16 East, Pinellas County, Floridsi, desergied as fallows, inntng at dta Southeast eornar of #tto North 756.05 feet of Sall Wag 112 of tho Southr i 1/4 of the swthmt im. mw rmning mence Scutth 6, 8,. 4r wsmajwv the Last boundary of said West 1/2 of the Southeast '1/4 of the Southeast 1/4,14D fnat;• them South 74" 12° 9" Wetst, 155.06 feet to the NortMasterly right-of-way boundary of County noway #1 (also hattkV boon ortonaltr mown as State Road 15); thence North 32' M 18" Wet ;atong told right -of way boundn% 280 feet, thence Seu#t1 n* 56,18" East, M.9 feat to tro Foot of t3 rtnhg, FLD2008 -03007 1573 S FT HARRISON AVE 1573 S FT HARRISON PLANNER OF RECORD: NOT ENTERED ATLAS # 313B ZONING: C LAND USE: CG RECEIVED: 03/03/2008 INCOMPLETE: COMPLETE: MAPS: PHOTOS: STAFF REPORT: DRC: CDB: CLWCoverSheet Page 1 of 2 Wells, Wayne. From: Wells,. Wayne Sent: Wednesday,. July 23,. 2008.1:36. PM To: Pryor, Mike;.' Mike @HowardCivilEngineering.com' Cc: ' trevor @howardcivilengineering.com Rice, Scott; Doherty, Steve; Josuns, Sarah;. Elbo, Bennett; Glenn,. Tom;. Beery, Mark Subject: BCP2008- 05607 - 1573 S. Ft. Harrison Ave. I think what I am hearing from everyone, and have transmitted to Mike. at Howard Civil. Engineering,. is that this revision is what we should see coming back in on revised plans for the BCP. - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Pryor, Mike Sent: Wednesday, July 23, 2008 9:27 AM To: Wells, Wayne; ' Mike @HowardCivilEngineering.com' Cc: ' trevor @howardcivilengineering.com'; Rice, Scott; Doherty, Steve; Josuns, Sarah; Elbo, Bennett; Glenn, Tom; Beery, Mark Subject: RE: BCP2008 -05607 - 1573 S. Ft. Harrison Ave. If the drawing that was sent with the last e-mail is ok with you, it is acceptable with us because it reflects a straight shot for our trucks to drive in to. If it is changed with an angle, we need to look at it again. The drawing they. sent yesterday was squared. up and is accessible without restrictions.. - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2008 5:12 PM To: ' Mike @HowardCivilEngineering.com' Cc: ' trevor @howardcivilengineering.com'; Rice, Scott; Doherty, Steve; Josuns, Sarah; Elbo, Bennett; Pryor, Mike; Glenn, Tom; Beery, Mark Subject: BCP2008 -05607 - 1573 S. Ft. Harrison Ave. Mike - So, I think I can finally say. you may make the necessary revisions to the. plans to resubmit for the building permit. Wayne - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Pryor, Mike Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2008 12:44 PM To: ' Mike @HowardCivilEngineering.com'; Wells, Wayne Cc: trevor @howardcivilengineering.com; Doherty, Steve; Rice, Scott; Josuns, Sarah Subject: RE: 1573 S. Ft. Harrison Ave. We can live with this new set up. Michael Pryor Supervisor II. 727 - 562 -4921 ext. 7112 cell 727 - 224 -7392 michael.pryor myclearwater.com. 7/23/2008 7/23/2008 • Page 2 of 2 - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Michael Serrano [mailto: Mike @HowardCivilEngineering.com] Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2008 10:09 AM To: Wells, Wayne; Pryor, Mike Cc: trevor @howardcivilengineering.com; Doherty, Steve; Rice, Scott; Josuns, Sarah Subject: Re: 1573 S. Ft. Harrison Ave. I have shifted the dumpster to just meet the 10' minimum buffer. This does not put it in the center of the drive but does give it a little more than 2' extra behind the east side parking along Ft. Harrison. See the attached PDF and please let me know if this might be a possible solution. WWe.Wells myClearwater.com wrote:. Looks like we aren't done.yet. Work with Steve Doherty.and Soli - - - -- Original From: Pryor, Sent: Friday To: Wells, . Cc: Glenn, Subject:. Message--- - Mike July 18, 2008 1:19 PM Wayne Tom;.Beery, Mark 1573.S.. Ft..Harrison Ave. Wayne, I have talked to Tom Glenn and reviewed with Mark Be Any further questions.or.comments.please contact me. Michael Pryor Supervisor II 727 - 562 -4921 ext..7112. cell 727 - 224 -7392. michael.pryor @myclearwater.com <mailto:michael.pryor @myclea El Page 1 of 2 Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Tuesday, July. 22,. 2008 5:12 PM To: ' Mike @HowardCivilEngineering.com' Cc: ' trevor @howardcivilengineering.com ;. Rice, Scott; Doherty, Steve;. Josuns, Sarah; Elbo, Bennett; Pryor, Mike; Glenn, Tom;. Beery, Mark Subject: BCP2008 -05607 - 1573 S. Ft. Harrison Ave. Mike So, I think I can finally say you may make the necessary revisions to the plans to resubmit for the building permit Wayne. - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Pryor, Mike Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2008 12:44 PM To: ' Mike @HowardCivilEngineering.com'; Wells, Wayne Cc: trevor @howardcivilengineering.com; Doherty, Steve; Rice, Scott; Josuns, Sarah Subject: RE: 1573 S. Ft. Harrison Ave. We can live with this new set up. Michael Pryor Supervisor II. 727 - 562 -4921 ext. 7112 cell 727-224-7392 michael.p.ry_ar@m cy learwater.com_ - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Michael Serrano [mailto: Mike @HowardCivilEngineering.com] Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2008 10:09 AM To: Wells, Wayne; Pryor, Mike Cc: trevor @howardcivilengineering.com; Doherty, Steve; Rice, Scott; Josuns, Sarah Subject: Re: 1573 S. Ft. Harrison Ave. I have shifted the. dumpster to just meet.the 10' minimum buffer. This does not put it in the center of.the. drive but does give it a little more than 2' extra behind the east side.parking along Ft..Harrison. See the attached PDF and please let me know if this might be a. possible solution. ;A 4 • • Page 2 of 2 Wayne.Wells(ci),myClearwater.com wrote:. Looks like we aren't done.yet...Work with Steve Doherty and Solid Waste fo - - - -- Original Message - - - - -. From: Pryor, Mike . Sent:. Friday,. July 18, 2008.1:19 PM To:. Wells,. Wayne. Cc: Glenn, Tom;.Beery, Mark Subject: 1573.S. Ft. Harrison Ave.. Wayne,. I have.talked to Tom Glenn and reviewed with Mark Beery.. In o Any further questions or comments.please contact me. Michael Pryor Supervisor. II. 727 - 562 -4921 ext. 7112 cell 727 - 224 -7392. michael.pryor@myclearwater.com < mailto :michael.pryor'omyclearwater.com 7/22/2008 is p -Not latted 'q, T� EXISTING WOOD BRIDGE TO BE REMOVED 79-54'32" ev 5. 8 30" I flr RLMOVE LE --4— TRAFFIC DUlff- ~f BOLLARDS ENCL.. PERIMETER BUF QWRESIDEN* FLUSH CONC. ADKJAI� CURB . ........ .... ........ .... E'D'CONC. O 1. CURB (TYP.) OTORM\WATER POND-R-LL- PERIMETER BUFFER INTERIOR (COLLECTOR R/W O. • Wells, Wayne • From: Wells,. Wayne Sent: Friday,. July 18,. 2008 3:30 PM To: ' Mike @HowardCivilEngineering.com' Cc: ' trevor @howardcivilengineering.com; Doherty, Steve; Rice, Scott; Josuns, Sarah Subject: 1573 S. Ft. Harrison Ave. Looks. like we aren't done yet.. Work with Steve Doherty and Solid Waste for the solution. - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Pryor, Mike. Sent: Friday, July 18, 2008.1:19 PM To: Wells, Wayne Cc: Glenn, Tom; Beery, Mark Subject: 1573 S. Ft. Harrison Ave. Wayne, I have talked to Tom. Glenn and reviewed with Mark Beery. In order to make that location work, that enclosure needs to be centered. and squared up. None. of our trucks can make that turn into that enclosure without crossing the parking spaces on the east side of the parking area. The only way we can even consider approving this angled enclosure is to have an agreement with the owners that nothing bigger than a 4 yard Dumpster can ever go in this location because it will require wheels. Any further questions or comments please contact me. Michael Pryor Supervisor 11 727 - 562 -4921 ext. 7112 cell 727 - 224 -7392 michael.pryor a().myclearwater.com <mai Ito: michael .pryor(a)myclearwater.com> Page 1 of 2 • Wells, Wayne From:. Wells, Wayne Sent:. Friday, July 18, 2008 11:16 AM To: ' Mike @HowardCivilEngineering.com' Cc: Doherty,. Steve;. Beery,. Mark; Glenn,. Tom; Rice, Scott;. Josuns, Sarah;. Elbo,. Bennett;. ' trevor @howardcivilengineering.com' Subject: 1573 Ft.. Harrison Project -. BCP2008 -05607 Mike. -. have. talked to Mark Beery regarding the information regarding the buffer Steve. Doherty discusses below. Mark now understands why the dumpster enclosure was not centered. as. he desired, but rather pushed westward to the edge of the end of the western parking spaces. Mark does have some concerns regarding potential conflicts with a vehicle parked in the adjacent parking space when the truck comes. Mark is sending me an email later today (maybe as an extension of this. email) detailing those concerns and ramifications. So, what it looks like is that the dumpster needs to stay in the originally designed location (not centered on the. drive aisle) in. order to limit the encroachment into the buffer as originally approved. The change relative to the bollards can still be implemented.. Hopefully this email clarifies what will be. indicated on the. plan when revised. plans are submitted. Wayne - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Doherty, Steve Sent: Friday, July 18, 2008 10:51 AM To: Wells, Wayne; ' Mike @HowardCivilEngineering.com'; Trevor Howard'; Beery, Mark; Glenn, Tom Cc: Rice, Scott; Josuns, Sarah; Elbo, Bennett Subject: RE: 1573 Ft. Harrison Project - BCP2008 -05607 CORRECTION Please note that this is also an encroachment into the 15 -foot vegetative. buffer required by Community Development Code Sec. 3 -907A. Sec. 3 -907B. allows the buffer to be reduced by up to 1/3 of the. width, if additional buffer area is provided that will result in equivalent or greater vegetative buffer area. Please be advised therefore that the minimum landscape buffer width is 10 -feet which means the dumpster enclosure shall be located a minimum of 10 -feet from top of bank. Stephen L. Doherty Engineering Specialist I City of Clearwater Engineering steve.dohefty@myclearwater.com 727: 562.4 773 - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2008 3:41 PM To: ' Mike@ HowardCivilEngineering.com'; Trevor Howard 7/22/2008 I .- Page 2 of 2 Cc: Rice, Scott; Doherty, Steve; Josuns, Sarah; Elbo, Bennett Subject: 1573 Ft. Harrison Project - BCP2008 -05607 Mike I have spoken to Steve Doherty. and Bennett Elbo regarding the revised. plan that you attached. Steve does not have a problem with the slight relocation of the dumpster enclosure to the middle of the drive aisle that Solid Waste desires, even though it represents a slightly greater encroachment into the. proposed maintenance easement along the ditch along the north property line. Additionally, Bennett agreed that moving the bollards 2 -3 feet into the landscaping area would be. acceptable to allow the northwestern most parking space adequate backup area.. The bollards would still be removable for equipment access when maintenance on the ditch is necessary,. but would still be effective in prohibiting vehicular encroachment generally into the landscape area.. Wayne - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Michael Serrano [mailto: Mike @HowardCivilEngineering.com] Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2008 11:16 AM To: Wells, Wayne; Trevor Howard Subject: 1573 Ft. Harrison Project BCP2008 -05607 Wayne,. attached is..a copy of the. site plan with dumpster moved to. the. center of the drive as solid waste. dept. wants.. This reduces. the distance from the top of bank down to about 7.4' As. far as. the backing up area for the last parking space as Bennett commented on, we could move the bollards.further into the green area providing some extra distance. Thanks, Mike. 7/22/2008 • Wells, Wayne. From: Wells,. Wayne Sent:. Friday,. July 18,.2008.10:15 AM To: ' Mike @HowardCivilEngineering.com' Cc: Doherty, Steve Subject: 1573 Ft. Harrison Project - BCP2008 -05607 • Page 1. of 2 Mike - Don't thank me yet. Steve. Doherty came to me this morning and he went back and looked at the circumstances related to the wetland buffer requirement.. Steve and /or I need. to check with Solid. Waste, but the dumpster was located so that the. enclosure. only encroached into. the buffer 1/3 of the required 15 feet (meaning there would be a 10 -foot buffer to the corner of the enclosure).. That is why the dumpster enclosure was not centered. before.. We will be back in touch today. Wayne - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Michael Serrano [mailto: Mike @HowardCivilEngineering.com] Sent: Friday, July 18, 2008 9:54 AM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: Re: 1573 Ft. Harrison Project - BCP2008 -05607 Thanks Wayne.. Wayne.Wells @myClearwater.com wrote:. 7/22/2008 Mike - I have spoken. to Steve Doherty and Bennett Elbo. regarding the revised plan that you attached. Steve does not have a problem with the slight relocation of the. dumpster enclosure to the middle of the. drive aisle that Solid Waste desires, even though it represents a slightly greater encroachment into. the. proposed maintenance easement along the ditch along the north property line. Additionally, Bennett agreed that moving the bollards 2 -3 feet into the landscaping area would be acceptable to allow the northwestern most parking space adequate backup area. The bollards would still be removable for equipment access when maintenance on the ditch is necessary, but would still be. effective in prohibiting vehicular encroachment generally into. the. landscape area.. Wayne. - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Michael Serrano [mailto: Mike.. OHowa.rdCivilEng.in_eering com] Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2008 11:16 AM To: Wells, Wayne; Trevor Howard Subject: 1573 Ft. Harrison Project BCP2008 -05607 Page 2 of 2 Wayne, attached is a copy of the site plan with dumpster moved to the center of.the drive as. solid waste. dept. wants... This reduces the distance from the.top of.bank down to about. 7.4'. As far as the backing. up. area for the. last, parking. space as. Bennett. commented on, we.could move.the bollards. further into the. green area providing some extra distance.. Thanks,. Mike �tchael Serrrio. � P�o�ect "�tl�r�a��er a Hodvarcf CIV I Eir me nnc 1G 1 3rd Street S+�rrtli Srrrt A St: P�ete�sbur� FL 337a9 P,liT27 }.�0 rasa Fax {727)1Jaw:1787 ib 7/22/2008 Page 1 of 1 J • • Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2008 3:41 PM To: ' Mike @HowardCivilEngineering.com; Trevor Howard Cc: Rice, Scott; Doherty, Steve; Josuns, Sarah; Elbo, Bennett Subject: 1573 Ft. Harrison Project - BCP2008 -05607 Mike - have spoken to Steve Doherty and Bennett Elbo regarding the revised plan that you attached. Steve does not have a problem with the slight relocation of the dumpster enclosure to the middle of the drive aisle that Solid Waste desires, even though it represents a slightly greater encroachment into the proposed maintenance easement along the ditch along the north property line. Additionally, Bennett agreed that moving the bollards 2 -3 feet into the landscaping area would be acceptable to allow the northwestern most parking space adequate backup area. The bollards would still be removable for equipment access when maintenance on the ditch is necessary, but would still be effective in prohibiting vehicular encroachment generally into the landscape area. Wayne - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Michael Serrano [mailto: Mike @HowardCivilEngineering.com] Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2008 11:16 AM To: Wells, Wayne; Trevor Howard Subject: 1573 Ft. Harrison Project BCP2008 -05607 Wayne, attached is a copy of the site plan with dumpster moved to the center of the drive as solid waste dept wants. This reduces the distance from the top of bank down to about 7.4' As far as the backing up area for the last parking space as Bennett commented on, we could move the bollards further into the green area providing some extra distance. Thanks, Mike 7/17/2008 0 6" \ Platted EXISTING WOOD BRIDGE TO BE REMOVED -74711 305 'DUM4?. TRAFFIC BOLLARDS PERIMETER BUFFER FLUSH CONC. CURB CO Nt PERIMETER BUFFER (COL TOR R/W r- INTERIOR CENT USE) / i INTERIOR LANDSCAPE SITE VISIBILITY AREA (164 SF) LANDSCAPE AREA (208 SF) TRIANG TYPr: 00M. � � ' __ — _ . � ... ~' , .` 1 ' ' ^".,".~....,~..= . �~^ ' ch, PLANNING DEPARTMENT -0 0- C ITY OF CLEARWATER POST OFFICE BOX 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758 -4748 MUNICIPAL. SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562 -4567 FAx (727) 562 -4865 May 21, 2008 Trevor Howard Howard Civil Engineering, LLC 1601 3rd Street South St. Petersburg, FL 33701 RE: Development Order - Case FLD2008 -03007 1573 S. Ft. Harrison Avenue Dear Mr. Howard: This letter constitutes a Development Order pursuant to Section 4- 206.D.6 of the Community Development Code. On May 20, 2008, the Community Development Board reviewed your request for Flexible Development approval to permit offices and medical clinics in the Commercial (C) District with reductions to the front (west) setback from 25 feet to 13.6 feet (to existing building), 16.3 (to proposed building) and 15 feet (to proposed pavement), a reduction to the side (south) setback from 10 feet to five feet (to existing building), a reduction to the rear (east) setback from 20 feet to 10 feet (to proposed pavement) and an increase to building height from 25 feet to 26.33 feet for an entry parapet, as a Comprehensive Infill .Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2- 704.C; and a reduction to the perimeter buffer along S. Ft. Harrison Avenue from 15 feet to 13.6 feet (to existing building), as a Comprehensive Landscape Program, under the provisions of Section 3- 1202.G. The Community Development Board (CDB) APPROVED the application with the following Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and Conditions of Approval: Findings of Fact: 1. The 0.96 acres is located on the east side of S. Ft. Harrison Avenue, approximately 500 feet north of Belleair Rd; 2. The property is currently developed with a two -story warehouse type building that has been vacant for a number of years, with no paved parking on the premises; 3. There have been two times in the past where improvements have been made to the property without the benefit of building permits, with those improvements later removed. When unapproved improvements were made to the property in 2004 it was calculated that 37- inches of trees were also illegally removed; 4. The proposal is to redevelop the site to permit offices and medical clinics; 5. The existing/proposed building will be a total of 10,853 square feet in floor area (5,570 square feet first floor; 5,283 square feet second floor), with stair and elevator additions to be constructed on the west and north sides of the existing building; "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER" May 21, 2008 Howard — Page 2 6. A total of 44 parking spaces will be constructed, meeting the Code required number of parking spaces for offices (the higher requirement of offices and medical clinics), as well as a required loading space; 7. The existing southern driveway will be reconfigured and moved northward, while the existing northern driveway will be removed as part of the site improvements, decreasing turning movements at this location where northbound lanes are merging thereby increasing safer future conditions; 8. The proposal includes reductions to the front (west) setback from 25 feet to 13.6 feet (to existing building), 16.3 (to proposed building) and 15 feet (to proposed pavement), a reduction to the side (south) setback from 10 feet to five feet (to existing building) and a reduction to the rear (east) setback from 20 feet to 10 feet (to proposed pavement); 9. The proposal is to retain the existing building, adding only a required egress stairwell on the west and north sides of the building and an elevator on the north side of the building; 10. The reductions .to required setbacks can be viewed as necessary to provide a relevant site and building design, given the context of the site and contiguous uses; 11. The proposal includes an increase to building height from 25 feet to 26.33 feet for an entry parapet. The increased height of the parapet is only at the entry area on the northern side of the building. The existing building otherwise meets Code height requirements; 12. The proposal includes a reduction to the perimeter landscape buffer along South Ft. Harrison Avenue from 15 feet to 13.6 feet (to existing building). The planting of the entire area between the west wall of the existing/proposed building and the front property line offsets the encroachment of this small triangular area of the building into the front landscape buffer; 13. The number and size of trees to be planted complies with the tree replacement requirements due to the previous removal of trees in 2004; and 14. There are no outstanding Code Enforcement issues associated with the subject property. Conclusions of Law: 1. That the development proposal is consistent with the Standards as per Tables 2- 701.1, 2 -703 and 2- 704 of the Community Development Code; 2. That the development proposal is consistent with the Flexibility criteria as per Section 2 -704.0 of the Community Development Code; 3. That the development proposal is consistent with the General Standards for Level Two Approvals as per Section 3 -913 of the Community Development Code; and 4. The proposal is compatible with the adjacent land uses. Conditions of Approval:. 1. That the final design and color of the offices and medical clinic building be consistent with the conceptual elevations submitted to, or as modified by, the CDB; 2. That any future freestanding sign be a monument -style sign and be designed to match the exterior materials and color of the building. The maximum height shall be six feet, unless a higher sign is approved through a Comprehensive Sign Program; 3. That, prior to the issuance of any permits, the landscape plans be amended to ensure plant counts are correct; 4. That, prior to the issuance of any permits, plans show the location of proposed outdoor mechanical equipment and the required screening in accordance with Section 3- 201.13; 5. That, prior to the issuance of any permits, a Tree Preservation Plan prepared by a certified arborist, consulting arborist, landscape architect or other specialist in the field of arboriculture be submitted; I, May 21, 2008 Howard — Page 3 6. That, prior to the issuance of any permits, a maintenance easement be recorded in the public records for the ditch along the north property line; 7. That, prior to the issuance of any permits, compliance with all requirements of General Engineering, Traffic Engineering and Stormwater Engineering be met; and 8. That, prior to the issuance of the building permit, the building and accent colors be amended to conform to the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan Design Guidelines. Pursuant to Section 4 -407, an application for a building permit or other approvals shall be made within one year of Flexible Development approval (by May 20, 2009). All required certificates of occupancy shall be obtained within two years of the date of issuance of the initial building permit. The building permit must be obtained within six months of the initial permit application. This timeframe to obtain the initial building permit may be extended for an additional six months for cause by the Community Development Coordinator. Time frames do not change with successive owners. The Community Development Coordinator may grant an extension of time for the Flexible Development approval for a period not to exceed one year and only within the original period of validity. The issuance of this Development Order does not relieve you of the necessity to obtain any building permits or pay any impact fees that may be required. In order to facilitate the issuance of any permit or license affected by this approval, please bring a copy of this letter with you when applying for any permits or licenses that require this prior development approval. Additionally, an appeal of a Level Two approval (Flexible. Development) may be initiated pursuant to Section 4 -502.13 by the applicant or by any person granted party status within 14 days of the date of the CDB meeting. The filing of an application/notice of appeal shall stay the effect of the decision pending the final determination of the case. The appeal period for your case expires on June 3, 2008 (14 days from the date of the CDB meeting). If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call Wayne M. Wells, Planner III, at 727 -562 -4504. You can access zoning information for parcels within the City through our website: www.myclearNvater.com/gov/depts/Tlannin. g. Sincere, Michael De k, AIC Planning Director S: IPlanning DepartmentlCD BIFLEX (FLD)Vnactive or Finished ApplicationslFt. Harrison S1573 Offices (C) - Approved - WWIFt. Harrison S 1573 Development Order 5.21.08.doc Wells, Wayne From: Trevor Howard [trevor @howardengineering.net] Sent: Friday, May 16, 2008 10:24 AM To: Wells, Wayne;. trevor @howardcivilengineering.com Cc: wseifril@tampabay.rr.com Subject: RE: FLD2008- 03007, 1573 S. Ft. Harrison. Avenue That's. will. work, Thank you. - -' - -- Original Message---- - From: Wayne. Wells @myClearwater.com [ mailto :Wayne.Wells @myClearwater.com] Sent: Friday,, May 16, 2008 10:20 AM To:. trevor @howardcivilengineering.com Cc: wseifril @tampabay.rr.com Subject: RE: FLD2008- 03007, 1573 S. Ft. Harrison Avenue Trevor - I can change the condition to read: 4. That, prior to the issuance of. any permits, plans show the.location of proposed outdoor mechanical equipment and required screening in accordance with Section 3- 201.D; If this is. acceptable, I.can do a memo to the CDB indicating this change to Condition ##4.and still keep it on the Consent agenda. Let me know. Wayne - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Trevor Howard [mailto :trevor @howardengineering.net] Sent: Friday, May 16, 2008 8:38 AM To: Wells,.Wayne Cc: 'Ann & Wayne Seifried' Subject:. RE: FLD2008- 03007, 1573.5.. Ft. Harrison Avenue Hello Wayne, We have looked through the report and the owner and ourselves are OK with the conditions exept Condition of Approval No 4. The mechanical equipment is not proposed to be on the roof.top.. The owner would like.the mechanical equipment to be on the east side of the building between the building and the retention pond and will be screened in accordance with City criterea. Please let me know if there is a problem with this. Thanks Wayne Trevor Howard,.P.E. HOWARD CIVIL ENGINEERING,.LLC 1601.3rd St.South Suite A St Petersburg.FL 33701 Phone:. 727 - 490 -1784 Fax: 727 - 490 -1787 Mobile: 727 - 481 -5049 1 A http://www.howardcivilengine0ng.com • - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Wayne. Wells @myClearwater.com ( mailto :Wayne.Wells @myClearwater.com] Sent: Wednesday, May 14, 2008 4:52. PM To: trevor @howardcivilengineering.com Cc: .trevor @howardengineering.net; wseifril @tampabay.rr.com Subject: FLD2008- 03007, 1573.S. Ft. Harrison Avenue Trevor - Attached is.the.Staff Report for the.above referenced request,.to.be heard by the CDB at l.pm on Thursday,.May 20, 2008, in Council Chambers. in City Hall,.112 S. Osceola Avenue. Please read especially the Conditions of Approval on the last page and let me know by 4pm on Friday, May 16th if the conditions are acceptable. (May 19th is a holiday)... If.the conditions are acceptable, I will place the request on the consent portion of.the CDB agenda (I have not yet received any letters or emails of opposition to the request). Wayne.M. Wells, AICP Planner III City of Clearwater 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater,.FL 33756 -5520 Phone: 727- 562 -4504 Fax:.727- 562 -4865 <<Ft..Harrison S 1573 Staff Report.doc ». 2 j Wells, Wayne, From: Wells, Wayne Sent. Thursday,. May 15,.2008 9:23 AM To: ' trevor @howardcivilengineering.com' Cc: ' trevor @howardengineering. net 'wseifril @tampabay.rr.com' Subject: FLD2008- 03007, 1573 S. Ft. Harrison Avenue Duh. Duh -. I don't know where my head was yesterday.. Monday is. a holiday, but only in Canada.. So, if you need more time to discuss the conditions, you may let me know by noon. on Monday, May 19th. From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Wednesday, May 14, 2008.4:54. PM To: ' trevor @howardcivilengineering.com' Cc: 'trevor @howardengineering. net ;. 'wseifri 1 @tampabay.rr.com' Subject: RE: FLD2008- 03007,.1573. S. Ft. Harrison Avenue Duh - The CDB meeting on May 20th is Tuesday, not Thursday. - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Wednesday, May 14, 2008 4:52 PM To: ' trevor @howardcivilengineering.com' Cc: ' trevor @howardengineering. net'; 'wseifril @tampabay.rr.com' Subject: FLD2008- 03007, 1573 S. Ft. Harrison Avenue Trevor- Attached is the Staff Report for the above referenced request, to be heard by the CDB at 1. pm on Thursday, May 20, 2008, in Council Chambers in City Hall, 112 S. Osceola Avenue. Please read especially the Conditions of Approval on the last page and let me know by 4pm on Friday, May 16th if the conditions are acceptable (May 19th is a holiday).. If the conditions. are acceptable, I will place the request on the consent portion of the CDB agenda (I have not yet received any letters or emails of opposition to the request). Wayne M. Wells, AICP Planner III City of Clearwater 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, FL 33756 -5520 Phone: 727- 562 -4504 Fax: 727 - 562 -4865 • Wells, Wayne • From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Wednesday, May 14, 2008.4:54 PM To: ' trevor @howardcivilengineering.com' Cc: 'trevor @howardengineering.net; 'wseifril @tampabay.rr.com' Subject: RE:. FLD2008- 03007, 1573 S.. Ft. Harrison. Avenue Duh - The CDB meeting on May 20th is Tuesday,. not Thursday. - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Wednesday, May 14, 2008 4:52 PM To: ' trevor @howardcivilengineering.com' Cc: 'trevor @howardengineering. net'; 'wseifril @tampabay.rr.com' Subject: FLD2008- 03007, 1573 S. Ft. Harrison Avenue Trevor- Attached is the Staff Report for the above referenced request, to be heard by the CDB at 1 pm. on Thursday, May 20, 2008, in Council Chambers. in City Hall, 112 S. Osceola Avenue. Please read especially the Conditions of Approval on the last page. and let me know by 4pm on Friday, May 16th if the conditions are acceptable (May 19th is a holiday).. If the conditions are acceptable, 1 will place the request on the consent portion of the CDB. agenda (I have not yet received any letters or emails of opposition to the. request). Wayne M. Wells, A/CP Planner III City of Clearwater 100 South Myrtle. Avenue Clearwater, FL 33756 -5520 Phone: 727 - 562 -4504 Fax: 727- 562 -4865 << File: Ft. Harrison S 1573 Staff Report.doc >> J]."H OW A R DO. ® CIVIL ENGINEERING May 2, 2008 IC11\1 \1%.1 1\ P.% V L Mr. Wayne Wells „,;; City of Clearwater Planning Department 100 S. Myrtle Ave 1573 S FT HARRISON OFFICE Clearwater, FL. 33758 Zoning: C atlas# 3136 Re: Flexible Development Application 1573 Ft. Harrison Office Dear Mr. Wells: Please find attached one original and 14 copies of: 1) Plans on 8'h" x 11" 2) Construction Plans. 3) Architects rendering , full size and 8'/2 x 11 And the following responses to your request for additional information: 1. 4/21/08 WW - Please see the shrub hedge along the south property line 3/24/08 — WW - Please see Sheet C-6 showing these changes 2. 4/21/08 — WW - Please see revised plant legend. 3/25/08 — WW - Please see revised plant legend. 3. 4/21/08 —WW -Plans have been revised. 3/25/08 — WW - Plans have been revised. Solid Waste. 1.4/21 /08 — TJG - Dumpster has been rotated. Zoning: Please see architects plans. 4. 4/21 /08 — WW - A title search has been performed. After speaking to the owner of the site on 5/01 /08, the owner informs me that there are no easements on the property that he is aware of. Should you need any further information, please don't hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, Trevor Howard, P.E Project Manager Howard Civil Engineering 0 2 2000 PLANK- 94G A71!0EN7 CITY OF QL:A!TIti/�4jER Howard Civil Engineering, LLC 16013'd Street South - Suite A St. Petersburg, FL. 33701 Office (727) 490 -1784 (Fax) 727 - 490 -1787 www.HowardCivilEngineering.com W=HOW�ARS April 14, 2008 Mr. Wayne Wells City of Clearwater Planning Department 100 S. Myrtle Ave Clearwater, FL. 33758 Dear Wayne, Below are our responses (in bold italic) to the comments from our previous submittal. General Engineering: 1. Resize dumpster pad area to meet requirements of City of Clearwater Contract Specifications and Standards, Part "C ", Construction Standards, Index #701. (Enclosure is 14' -8" wide x 10' -8" deep). Include Index #701 page 1/3 on details sheet. The enclosure has been revised to the proper size and the detail has been added to sheet C -7. 2. Applicant shall obtain a City of Clearwater right -of -way permit for proposed driveway. The right -of -way permit will be applied for. 3. The proposed occupancies of the building include medical offices; consequently the applicant/owner will be responsible for all associated fees to install a required reduced pressure B.F.P.D. (back flow preventor device). Owner /Applicant acknowledges that is their responsibility for all fees. Environmental: 1 .Community Development Code Section 3 -907 requires a 15 foot vegetative buffer from the top of the bank of any creeks and channels for all construction activities, including parking lots. Modify plans to allow for a 15 foot vegetative buffer from the channel on the north side of the property. Per Section 3- 907(6) the buffer has been reduced by the allowable width in some areas but has been expanded in other areas. The overall area of the buffer has been increased. See attached 8.5 "x11" drawing showing the proposed buffer. Fire: Prior to building permit: An Asbestos Survey is usually required prior to conducting any interior or exterior renovations. Please contact Mickey Crane at Pinellas County Air Quality (464 -4422) for further information. Owner /Applicant acknowledges that is their responsibility for the Asbestos Survey and will be coordinating with the Crane. 1. All areas of all floors shall have access to 2 remote exits. the 2nd floor appears to be 2 separate tenant spaces and shows access to only 1 stair from the space on the east side. Add an additional stair to correct this. Show on Plan PRIOR TO CDB The second floor area has been revised and now shows access to 2 remote exits. Harbor Master: 1. No issues. Legal: 1. No issues. orz*l - RECV 2 2000 PLANNING DRAZTUENT CITY OF CUA011 IV,ER Howard Civil Engineering, LLC 1601 3'd Street South - Suite A St. Petersburg, FL. 33701 Office (727) 490 -1784 (Fax) 727 - 490 -1787 www.HowardCivilEnaineering.com Land Resources: 1. The Tree Inventory is inconsistent with the code grading system and there are some observations that I don't concur with. Set a field meeting to address prior to CDB. On -Site meeting between the arborist and Rick Albee has occurred. 2. Show all trees with their canopies, on all of the civil plans prior to CDB. Plans have been revised and now show the tree canopies on every plan sheet. 3. The proposed 1' -2' +/- cut is too close to trees #13 -15. Recommend revising the elevations'and /or placing concrete "on grade" and providing and aeration system, Revise prior to CDB. Parking area has been regraded to eliminate the severe cut, and a Wane3000 Tree System has been called out for aeration. 4. The proposed top of bank is too close to tree #17. Revise the TOB to be at least 15' away from the tree prior to CDB. Top of bank has been shifted to 15' from tree. 5. Trees # 3, 4, 5 and 29 are shown to be preserved. Address the FM impact at these trees prior to CDB. These trees are now proposed to be removed. 6 .Provide a Tree Preservation Plan prepared by a certified arborist, consulting arborist, landscape architect or other specialist in the field of arboriculture. This plan must show how the proposed building, parking, stormwater and utilities impact the critical root zones (drip lines) of trees to be preserved and how you propose to address these impacts i.e.; crown elevating, root pruning and /or root aeration systems. Other data required on this plan must show the trees canopy line, actual tree barricade limits (2/3 of the drip line and /or in the root prune lines if required), and the tree barricade detail. And any other pertinent information relating to tree preservation. Provide prior to building permit. This item is not available at the time of re- submittal and will be submitted at a later date. Landscaping: 1. Since the existing building is located 13.6 feet from the front property line, a Comprehensive Landscape Program application must be submitted to request the reduction of the front perimeter buffer from 15 to 13.6 feet. The application has been included in this re- submittal. 2. Sheet C -4 - Indicate for the northern existing driveway apron and that portion of the existing southern driveway apron that are proposed to be removed must be sodded. Notes stating such have been added to Sheet C -4. 3. Landscape buffers require 100% shrubs. Revise to show on the Landscape Plan the following: a. Suggest the front buffer along S. Ft. Harrison Avenue provide a tiered effect with shrubs, with the higher /taller shrubs in the back and the shorter shrubs in front. An additional shrub species has been added to the plans to create the desired effect. b. The south and east buffers need to be planted with shrubs; and Shrubs have been added. c. Shrubs may be planted /are required within the visibility triangles, but must be maintained to maximum of 30- inches. Notes stating such have been added to Sheet C -6. 4. Sheet C -6 - Do not plant new trees under the canopy of existing trees. Relocate proposed trees. Proposed trees have been relocated to avoid being placed under an existing tree canopy. 5. Required trees by Code are to be shade trees. Two accent trees (placed relatively close to each other to aggregate the same intended canopy) = one shade tree. Three palms (clumped together) = one shade tree. Proposed trees have been revised to be a shade tree, see sheet C -6. OF "ert RECE1 Howard Civil Engineering, LLC 1601 3rd Street South - Suite A St. Petersburg, FL. 33701 `U' 7008 Office (727) 490 -1784 (Fax) 727 - 490 -1787 www.HowardCivilEngineering.com yA NPpp, D;ttRE �i,°N VER �raf:o" P `ZweaIIr 6. Sheet C -6 - For interior landscape areas, shrubs making up 50% of the required green space and groundcover for the balance of the interior landscape area in lieu of turf are required, per Section 3- 1202. E.1. Ground cover has been added to the interior parking islands. 7. Show interior landscape shading and square footages on Sheet C -3 rather than Sheet C -6, as it is difficult to read and /or read the proposed landscaping on Sheet C -6 with such shading. Plans have been revised. 8. Sheet C -6 - Plan is not clear, when correlated to the 8.5" x 11" tree inventory, as to which trees are being saved versus removed, including trees #9, 11, 12, 13, 15, 23, 29, 30 and 37. Sheet C -6 shows the proposed tree to be removed with a bold X over the existing tree symbol. 9. The minimum required number of trees for this site, either through preserved trees or new trees, is based on the following: Perimeter: Front = 280735' = 8 trees; Side (N) = 306735' = 9 trees; Side (S) = 156'/35'= 4 trees; Rear = 140735' = 4 trees Foundation = 50740' = 1 tree Interior = 1528 sf /150 sf = 10 trees Total = 36 trees Sheet C -6 shows the proper amount of trees to be installed or preserved. 10. Sheet C -6 - Directly west of the building, the symbol indicates 2 LI, but there is only one tree symbol shown. Revise quantity to 1 U. Plans have been revised. 11. Sheet C -6 - Revise the Proposed Plant Legend to indicate the botanical name abbreviation. Plans have been revised. 12. Sheet C -6 - Proposed Plant Legend indicates 224 VO, but the plan only indicates 223 VO. Recount and revise. Plans have been revised with the correct amount. 13. Sheet C -6 - Terminal landscape island on the north side of the driveway only has 1 LI. Either change out to a shade tree or add one LI. One Ll has been added to the island. Parks and Recreation: 1 . No issues - commercial interior remodel. Stormwater: 1. The following shall be addressed prior to review by the Community Development Board: 1. No vertical wall on the pond shall be located next to the property line. Vertical wall has been moved to parking lot side of pond. 2. Show cross sections of all ponds showing all designed elevations, underdrain pipes and reflect exact existing and proposed elevations, not a typical type of cross sections. Cross sections are now shown on Sheet C -4. The following shall be addressed prior to the issuance of a building permit: 1. The 15' drainage easement provided is in an irregular shape and will be difficult to be described. Instead please show on the revised plan a 25' drainage easement measured from the northern property line over the existing ditch to be dedicated to the City of Clearwater. The drainage easement is now 25 foot from the property line. ORIAMNAL RE IOW Howard Civil Engineering, LLC 1601 3'd Street South - Suite A St. Petersburg, FL. 33'701 c� �OQ� Office (727) 490 -1784 (Fax) 727 - 490 -1787 www.HowardCivilEngineerinci.com 2. Provide soil analysis with seasonal high water table elevations at the ponds. This information is in the Geo -Tech report which has been included with this resubmittal. 3. Survey shall include 50' adjacent topography on the east and north of property lines and all finished floor elevations of adjacent properties located within this 50' area. The Owner /Applicant acknowledges that this information is required and will provided as soon as it is received from the surveyor. 4. Stormwater pipes located in the easement shall be reinforced concrete material. All pipes have been revised and are now RCP. 5. Off -site runoff needs to be addressed. Show on the plan the historical stormwater flow pattern. Pre - developed basin map showing flow has been included in the drainage report. 6. Show finished floor elevation of the existing building on -site and show the survey datum on the paving and grading plan. The finish floor elevation and the Survey Datum have been added to sheet C -4 7. Provide erosion control at the ditch where the outfall pipes discharge. Concrete rip -rap has been added to the outfa/ls. 8. Are the control structures of FDOT modified Type E? Detail sheet shows detail of City of Clearwater. Show separate detail for control structure A and B and show all designed elevations on the details. Callouts of control structures shall refer to their detail numbers. Control structures are FDOT Type 'C'. We have included details for each structure on sheet C -9 9. Concrete flume shall be provided at all 2' opening curb to prevent erosion. No flumes are required due to the change of the ponds retaining wall. 10. Show details for all storm structures including the flume detail and the mitered end sections. Details have been added to sheet C -9. 11. Control structures shall have skimmers. Please provide detail of skimmers. Details have been added to sheet C -9. 12. Based on the underdrain detail provided, the clearance between pond bottom and top of underdrain is 2', but the current design does not match the detail provided. Please verify this for accuracy. Detail has been revised. 13. Provide a copy of the approved SWFWMD permit. A copy of the SWFWMD permit will be submitted when received. 14. Please provide a revised drainage report and stormwater narrative reflecting the following changes and /or additional information: a) Soil analysis with seasonal high water elevations at the ponds b) Basin map showing the off -site runoff contribution to the site c) Correct dimension of drainage easement to be dedicated to the City d) %2 " water quality calculations e) Existing impervious area can only be given' /2 credit when calculating the runoff coefficient values (C) f) Verify the survey datum and update the Stage Storage Table's Elevation column accordingly. Stage storage table Elevation column shall be in smaller increments to reflect all the designed water elevations and their corresponding cumulative volumes. g) It is not clear whether a current design of control structures has weir. If so, please provide a weir design. Show that the flow rate of post development does not exceed the flow rate of the pre - development. 0RI MM RE Howard Civil Engineering, LLC 1601 3rd Street South - Suite A St. Petersburg, FL 5, 70 2 2008 Office (727) 490 -1784 (Fax) 727 - 490 -1787 www.HowardCivi1Engineerinr�ecomN !4 DUIARTMENT ElF N".C4°t1.M'ryPrlei��4P h) Provide the speotion supporting the permeability value, K *42 feet/hour that was used in the drawdown analysis. The revised drainage report addresses comments 14 a -h which is included with this re- submittal. General note: 1. DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review;. additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. Solid Waste: 1 . Please straighten out dumpster enclosure approach. Will not be able to service as shown. Dumpster enclosure has been revised to lessen the angle. Traffic Engineering: The following to be addressed prior to Building Permit: 1. On the handicapped sign detail change the Florida Statute to read "F.S. 318.18 ". Detail has been revised. 2. On the handicapped stall detail change the stall length to 18 feet. Detail has been revised. 3. Concrete steps are located in the loading zone. Please delete. Note has been added stating these are to be removed. General Note(s): 1) Applicant shall comply with the current Transportation Impact Fee Ordinance and fee schedule and paid prior to a Certificate of Occupancy (C.O.). Owner /Applicant acknowledges that is their responsibility for all fees. 2) DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may be forth coming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. Owner /Applicant acknowledges this. Planning: 1. Sheet A -3 - East Elevation is really the West Elevation and vice versa. Revise titles on elevations 1 and 3. Elevations have been revised. 2. On Page 7 of the application form, fill in the following: Acknowledgement of traffic impact study requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following): Traffic Impact Study is included. The study must include a summary table of pre- and post - development levels of service for all roadway legs and each turning movement at all intersections identified in the Scoping Meeting. Traffic Impact Study is not required. Owner /Applicant has initialed the proper line on the re- submitted form. 3. On all civil plans, show the location of all existing trees on -site and within 25 feet of the subject property (tree survey), including drip lines, and indicating which trees are proposed to be removed. Need to translate the small 8.5" x 11" plans showing the trees on -site and on the adjacent property to be preserved and to be removed on the larger civil sheets to allow for ease of reviewing impacts on other proposed improvements and proposed trees. All plan sheets now show the trees and their canopies. wMW RECEN 4 02 2008 Howard Civil Engineering, LLC 1601 3`d Street South - Suite A St. Petersburg, 3;70a e Office (727) 490 -1784 (Fax) 727 - 490 -1787 www.HowardCivi1Engineerini - Ain �o� �ivrr�9fm 4. Are there any public or Ate easements on the property that could at the site design (survey was prepared without the benefit of a title search)? Response sheet from March 11, 2008, indicated the owner is to provide such information. 5. Sheet C -1 - Revise Site Data for the following: a. Proposed Building and structure heights (revise to that indicated in the request by Planning); Building height has been revised on the Cover Sheet. b. Proposed Impervious Area Ratio (indicated is 0.45, but if you add the proposed vehicle use area, building and sidewalk, it adds up to 0.537); Ratio has been revised on the Cover Sheet. c. Proposed Structure setbacks - Revise Front to 13.6 feet (to existing building), 16.3 feet (to proposed building) and 15 feet (to proposed pavement); Revise Side to 5 feet (south) (to existing building); Revise Rear to 10 feet (to proposed pavement); and Setbacks have been revised on the Cover Sheet. d. Proposed Use - Indicate Professional Offices and Medical Clinics Proposed use has been revised on the Cover Sheet. 6. Wheel stops are required for all parking spaces except the seven spaces east of the handicap parking spaces next to the building. Wheel stops have been added to the drawings. 7. Sheet A -3 - Elevation 3 Side Elevation (West - really East) - Provide stucco color numbers on right hand side of elevation. Elevations have been re- labeled. 8. Provide samples of proposed exterior building colors. Samples of colors are included with this resubmittal. 9. Provide reduced copy (8.5" x 11 ") rendered (colored) elevations. A colored copy is included with this resubmittal. 10. Provide reduced copy (8.5" x 11 ") rendered (colored) site plan (prefer landscape plan). This item is not available at the time of re- submittal and will be submitted at a later date. 11. Sheets C -3, CA C -5 and C -6 - Remove existing concrete ramp east of proposed interior stairs (landscape plan still shows the concrete ramp even though landscaping is also indicated in the same location). Notes have been added to plans to remove these items. 12. Dumpster size indicated on Sheet C -3 is not the same size as indicated by Detail #701 shown on Sheet C -7. Revise Sheet C -3. The enclosure has been revised to the proper size. 13. On Page 7 of the application form, fill in the following: Acknowledgement of fire flow calculations /water study requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following): Fire Flow Calculations/Water Study is included. Fire Flow Calculations/Water Study is not required. Owner /Applicant has initialed the proper line on the re- submitted form. 14. Page 1 of application - Description of Request - It is indicated that the building will be "approximately 11,000 sf'. We don't deal with "approximate" for site data. Provide correct information. Owner /Applicant has revised the application on the re- submitted form. 15. All existing overhead utilities on -site must be placed underground with this proposal (place note on Sheet C -3). Note has been added to the drawings stating such. ORWAL REMOW Howard Civil Engineering, LLC 1601 3rd Street South - Suite A St. Petersburg,( 32 &f Office (727) 490 -1784 (Fax) 727 - 490 -1787 www.HowardCivi]Engineering.com PV' NN- 1,R',aG NFRIMENT CIRVnV- (- A- AV%V!'w -_r1 16. Sheets C -3, CA C -5 and C -6 - Need to address what is happening to the existing concrete steps east of the landing (to be removed ?). These steps encroach into the loading space. Notes have been added to plans to remove these items. 17. Per Section 3- 1406.13, need to provide a minimum stacking distance from the front property line to the first parking space or drive aisle of 20 feet, based on the parking provided under this proposal. Alternately, to have the first parking space at a 15.84 -foot distance from the front property line, a specific traffic study must be submitted justifying the proposed reduction. The first parking space is approximately 46 feet from Fort Harrison Ave. through lane. This should allow stacking for 2 cars (see sheet C -3). 18. There are existing wood stairs adjacent to the south property line at the southwest corner of the existing building. Unclear the future need for such stairs. Are these stairs proposed to be removed? The stairs are to be removed. A note has been added to the plans stating such. 19. There exists a wood foot bridge over the ditch on the north side. Is it intended to remain? The bridge is to be removed. A note has been added to the plans stating such. 20. Response to General Applicability criteria #1 - Response must discuss HOW the proposal meets the criteria (good information provided but it doesn't address the criteria). Owner /Applicant has revised the application on the re- submitted form. 21. Response to General Applicability criteria #2 - Unclear as to what "creating a business" means. If you mean that the building has been vacant and redeveloping the building that has been passed over to have medical clinics and offices in the building will not hinder the development or use of adjacent properties, say such. Owner /Applicant has revised the application on the re- submitted form. 22. Response to General Applicability criteria #3 - It is recommended to also add in the response how the redevelopment of the site reduces the number of driveways from two to one, which can be viewed as a safety improvement to pedestrians and motorists (since the right hand lane is merging left at this location). Owner /Applicant has revised the application on the re- submitted form. 23. Response to General Applicability criteria #4 - It is recommended to also add in the response how the redevelopment of the site reduces the number of driveways from two to one, which can be viewed as a safety improvement to pedestrians and motorists (since the right hand lane is merging left at this location), also minimizing traffic turning movements at this location. Owner /Applicant has revised the application on the re- submitted form. 24. Response to Comprehenisve Infill Redevelopment Project criteria #3 - Response needs to address HOW the proposal is consistent with the surrounding properties, discussing the surrounding uses and scale of buildings. Owner /Applicant has revised the application on the re- submitted form. 25. Response to Comprehenisve Infill Redevelopment Project criteria #4 - Response should also discuss the benefits of this proposal, such as having a use in a building that has been vacant, with appropriate parking and landscaping improvements. Owner /Applicant has revised the application on the re- submitted form. 26. Response to Comprehenisve Infill Redevelopment Project criteria #5 - Response needs to describe in detail HOW this proposal: a. is compatible with the surrounding uses; b. will not substantially alter the essential use characteristics of the neighborhood; and c. will be a significant economic contributor. Owner /Applicant has revised the application on the re- submitted form. REC Howard Civil Engineering, LLC 1601 P Street South - Suite A St. Petersburg, FL: iJ7092 2008 Office (727) 490 -1784 (Fax) 727 - 490 -1787 www. Howard0vilEngineeri N .or,14G N,,`,A�,1T V1Eyi T 0 0 27. Response to Comprehenisve Infill Redevelopment Project criteria #6 - Response must address, in detail, ALL of the criteria (a - e). Owner /Applicant has revised the application on the re- submitted form. 28. As a heads -up issue, required egress from the second floor with two means of egress from all tenant spaces may be an issue. While this life- safety issue is really reviewed at the building permit stage, if there are issues that translate into additional stairs and required egress doors and sidewalks (which can affect required setbacks and landscaping), it is advisable to look into this issue now and make necessary revisions to the site /building plans. You may want to check with our Building Plans Examiners (Jeff Walker, 562 - 4567). The second floor area has been revised and now shows access to 2 remote exits. Should you need any further information, please don't hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, Michae Serrano Project Manager Howard Civil Engineering Mobile (813) 881 -1676 0F."MINAL RECD- D 0 2 2000 Howard Civil Engineering, LLC 1601 3rd Street South - Suite A St. Petersburg, FL. 33701 Office (727) 490 -1784 (Fax) 727 - 490 -1787 www.HowardCivilEn ing eering.com k 0 0 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER POST OFFICE BOX 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758 -4748 MUNICIPAL, SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562 -4567 FAx (727) 562 -4865 April 22, 2008 Trevor Howard Howard Civil Engineering, LLC 1601 3rd Street South St. Petersburg, FL 33701 Re: Community Development Board Meeting (Case No. FLD2008- 03007) Dear Mr. Howard: You have filed Case No. FLD2008 -03007 for property located at 1573 S. Ft. Harrison Avenue for Flexible Development approval to permit offices and medical clinics in the Commercial (C) District with reductions to the front (west) setback from 25 feet to 13.6 feet (to existing building), 16.3 (to proposed building) and 15 feet (to proposed pavement), a reduction to the side (south) setback from 10 feet to five feet (to existing building), a reduction to the rear (east) setback from 20 feet to 10 feet (to proposed pavement) and an increase to building height from 25 feet to 26.33 feet for an entry parapet, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2- 704.C; and a reduction to the perimeter buffer along S. Ft. Harrison Avenue from 15 feet to 13.6 feet (to existing building), as a Comprehensive Landscape Program, under the provisions of Section 3- 1202.G. This case has been scheduled for review by the Community Development Board on May 20, 2008. The meeting will take place at 1:00 p.m. in the City Council Chambers, 3rd floor of City Hall at 112 S. Osceola Avenue, Clearwater. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call me at 727 -562 -4504. WaynM. Wells, AICP Planner III S. (Planning DepartmentIC D BIFLEX (FLD)IPending cases Up forth e next CDBIFt. Harrison S1573 Vices (C) - 5.20.08 CDB - WwFt. Harrison S 1573 CDB Letter. doc "EQUAL. EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER" t • • ells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Monday, April 21, 2008 5:32 PM To: 'trevor @howardcivilengineering.com' Cc: Watkins, Sherry Subject: FLD2008- 03007, 1573 S. Ft. Harrison Avenue Trevor- The above referenced application is being scheduled for the May 20, 2008, CDB meeting. However, the following revisions are still necessary to the submitted plans for this case: Landscaping 1. 4/21/08 - WW Sheet C -6 - Need to install shrub hedge along south side of building in southern buffer. 3/24/08 - WW Landscape buffers require 100% shrubs. Revise to show on the Landscape Plan the following: a. Suggest the front buffer along S. Ft. Harrison Avenue provide a tiered effect with shrubs, with the higher /taller shrubs in the back and the shorter shrubs in front; b. The south and east buffers need to be planted with shrubs; and c. Shrubs may be planted /are required within the visibility triangles, but must be maintained to maximum of 30- inches. J2.4/21 /08 - WW Plant Legend does not include the botanical name abbreviation (such as QV, LI, VO, etc). Additionally, the Plan needs to identify the number of Parson's Juniper (with its botanical name abbreviation) in each area of the site. 3/25/08 - WW Sheet C -6 - Revise the Proposed Plant Legend to indicate the botanical name abbreviation. Q4/21/08 - WW Recount VO and revise (I now count 220, but the Legend indicates 221). Counts should change based on other comment regarding southern buffer. 3/25/08 - WW Sheet C -6 - Proposed Plant Legend indicates 224 VO, but the plan only indicates 223 VO. Recount and revise. Solid Waste 1. 4/21/08 - TJG Rotate the dumpster enclosure to have a straight in truck movement (enclosure 90- degrees to the drive aisle). 3/25/08 - TJG Please straighten out dumpster enclosure approach. Will not be able to service as shown. Zoning /20/08 - WW Sheet A -3 now Sheet A -5 - Comment still applies (even though the response letter says it was revised. 3/24/08 - WW Sheet A -3 - East Elevation is really the West Elevation and vice versa. Revise titles on Elevations 1 and 3. 4.4/20/08 - WW No response. 3/6/08 - WW Are there any public or private easements on the property that could affect the site design (survey was prepared without the benefit of a title search)? Response sheet from March 11, 2008, indicated the owner is to provide such information. Q 4/20/08 - WW Sheet A -3 now Sheet A -5 - Comment still is applicable (even though the response letter says it was revised). Also, add in the Color Legend that was on Sheet A -3 on Sheet A -5. 3/24/08 - WW Sheet A -3 - Elevation 3 Side Elevation (West - really East) - Provide stucco color numbers on right hand side of elevation. �4. 4/20/08 - WW Comment still is applicable (even though response letter says they were submitted with this resubmittal). 3/24/08 - WW Provide samples of proposed exterior building colors. Please revise the appropriate sheets and resubmit one original and 14 copies, including the 8.5 "x 11" reduced plans (15 copies of the reduced plans). Please resubmit no later than noon on May 2, 2008. Wayne M. Wells, AICP Planner III City of Clearwater 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, FL 33756 -5520 Phone: 727 - 562 -4504 Fax: 727 - 562 -4865 Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Tuesday, April 15, 2008 9:50 AM To: ' Mike @HowardCivilEngineering.com' Cc: Watkins, Sherry Subject: RE: 1573 Fort Harrison project Page 1 of 1 Yes, Sheet C -10 is missing. Please bring.the original sheet and 14 copies so that you can insert this sheet. - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Michael Serrano [mailto: Mike @HowardCivilEngineering.com] Sent: Tuesday, April 15, 2008 9:43 AM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: 1573 Fort Harrison project Good morning Wayne, Did you receive the re- submitted sets of the plans? Do the sets have sheet C -10? The copy that we got back from the reproduction company was missing sheet C -10. If it is missing I could bring over and insert 1 original and 14 copies. Sorry about not checking these thoroughly but was in a bit of a time crunch. Thanks, Mike P�1il a Praje`i Howa t0i'.J St P?e Pts Vii; 4/15/2008 '� #;ej A W:H O WAR'D CIVIL ENGINEERING April 14, 2008 Mr. Wayne Wells City of Clearwater Planning Department 100 S. Myrtle Ave Clearwater, FL. 33758 Dear Wayne, Below are our responses (in bold italic) to the comments from our previous submittal. General Engineering: 1. Resize dumpster pad area to meet requirements of City of Clearwater Contract Specifications and Standards, Part "C ", Construction Standards, Index #701. (Enclosure is 14' -8" wide x 10' -8" deep). Include Index #701 page 1/3 on details sheet. The enclosure has been revised to the proper size and the detail has been added to sheet C -7. 2. Applicant shall obtain a City of Clearwater right -of -way permit for proposed driveway. The right -of -way permit will be applied for. 3. The proposed occupancies of the building include medical offices; consequently the applicant/owner will be responsible for all associated fees to install a required reduced pressure B.F.P.D. (back flow preventor device). Owner /Applicant acknowledges that is their responsibility for all fees. Environmental: 1 .Community Development Code Section 3 -907 requires a 15 foot vegetative buffer from the top of the bank of any creeks and channels for all construction activities, including parking lots. Modify plans to allow for a 15 foot vegetative buffer from the channel on the north side of the property. Per Section 3- 907(6) the buffer has been reduced by the allowable width in some areas but has been expanded in other areas. The overall area of the buffer has been increased. See attached 8.5 "x11" drawing showing the proposed buffer. Fire: Prior to building permit: An Asbestos Survey is usually required prior to conducting any interior or exterior renovations. Please contact Mickey Crane at Pinellas County Air Quality (464 -4422) for further information. Owner /Applicant acknowledges that is their responsibility for the Asbestos Survey and will be coordinating with the Crane. 1. All areas of all floors shall have access to 2 remote exits. the 2nd floor appears to be 2 separate tenant spaces and shows access to only 1 stair from the space on the east side. Add an additional stair to correct this. Show on Plan PRIOR TO CDB The second floor area has been revised and now shows access to 2 remote exits. Harbor Master: 1. No issues. Legal: 1. No issues. APR 14 2000 FLANK G, l IRRTIOENT C701 Y OF CLEA17 A R Howard Civil Engineering, LLC 1601 3rd Street South - Suite A St. Petersburg, FL. 33701 Office (727) 490 -1784 (Fax) 727 - 490 -1787 www.HowardCivilEngineering.com • • Land Resources: 1. The Tree Inventory is inconsistent with the code grading system and there are some observations that I don't concur with. Set a field meeting to address prior to CDB. On -Site meeting between the arborist and Rick Albee has occurred. 2. Show all trees with their canopies, on all of the civil plans prior to CDB. Plans have been revised and now show the tree canopies on every plan sheet. 3. The proposed 1' -2' +/- cut is too close to trees #13 -15. Recommend revising the elevations and /or placing concrete "on grade" and providing and aeration system, Revise prior to CDB. Parking area has been regraded to eliminate the severe cut, and a Wane3000 Tree System has been called out for aeration. 4. The proposed top of bank is too close to tree #17: Revise the TOB to be at least 15' away from the tree prior to CDB. Top of bank has been shifted to 15' from tree. 5. Trees # 3, 4, 5 and 29 are shown to be preserved. Address the FM impact at these trees prior to CDB. These trees are now proposed to be removed. 6 .Provide a Tree Preservation Plan prepared by a certified arborist, consulting arborist, landscape architect or other specialist in the field of arboriculture. This plan must show how the proposed building, parking, stormwater and utilities impact the critical root zones (drip lines) of trees to be preserved and how you propose to address these impacts i.e.; crown elevating, root pruning and /or root aeration systems. Other data required on this plan must show.the trees canopy line, actual tree barricade limits (2/3 of the drip line and /or in the root prune lines if required), and the tree barricade detail. And any other pertinent information relating to tree preservation. Provide prior to building permit. This item is not available at the time of re- submittal and will be submitted at a later date. Lands aping: S31. Since the existing building is located 13.6 feet from the front property line, a Comprehensive Landscape Program application must be submitted to request the reduction of the front perimeter buffer from 15 to 13.6 feet. The application has been included in this re- submittal. h. Sheet C -4 - Indicate for the northern existing driveway apron and that portion of the existing southern driveway apron that are proposed to be removed must be sodded. Notes stating such have been added to Sheet C -4. Landscape buffers require 100% shrubs. Revise to show on the Landscape Plan the following: a. Suggest the front buffer along S. Ft. Harrison Avenue provide.a tiered effect with shrubs, with the higher /taller shrubs in the back and the shorter shrubs in front. An additional shrub species has been added to the plans to create the desired effect. b. The south and east buffers need to be planted with shrubs; and Shrubs have been added. c. Shrubs may be planted /are required within the visibility triangles, but must be maintained to maximum of 30- inches. Notes stating such have been added to Sheet C -6. f 4. Sheet C -6 - Do not plant new trees under the canopy of existing trees. Relocate proposed trees. Proposed trees have been relocated to avoid being placed under an existing tree canopy. J5. Required trees by Code are to be shade trees. Two accent trees (placed relatively close to each other to aggregate the same intended canopy) = one shade tree. Three palms (clumped together) = one shade tree. Proposed trees have been revised to be a shade tree, see sheet C -6. ORM RECOWD AFRN 14 2000 Howard Civil Engineering, LLC 1601 P Street South - Suite A St. Petersburg, FL. 33701 Office (727) 490 -1784 (Fax) 727 - 490 -1787 www.HowardCivilEngineering.com PLANNiNG TMENT WT r 0 0 �6. Sheet C -6 - For interior landscape areas, shrubs making up 50% of the required green space and groundcover for the balance of the interior landscape area in lieu of turf are required, per Section 3- 1202. E.1. Ground cover has been added to the interior parking islands. % `� 7. Show interior landscape shading and square footages on Sheet C -3 rather than Sheet C -6, as it is difficult to read and /or read the proposed landscaping on Sheet C -6 with such shading. Plans have been revised. 8. Sheet C -6 - Plan is not clear, when correlated to the 8.5" x 11 " tree inventory, as to which trees are being saved versus removed, including trees #9, 11, 12, 13, 15, 23, 29, 30 and 37. Sheet C -6 shows the proposed tree to be removed with a bold X over the existing tree symbol. J9. The minimum required number of trees for this site, either through preserved trees or new trees, is based on the following: Perimeter: Front = 280735' = 8 trees; Side (N) = 306'/35'= 9 trees; Side (S) = 156735' = 4 trees; Rear = 140735' = 4 trees Foundation = 50740' = 1 tree Interior = 1528 sf /150 sf = 10 trees Total = 36 trees Sheet C -6 shows the proper amount of trees to be installed or preserved. J 10. Sheet C -6 - Directly west of the building, the symbol indicates 2 LI, but there is only one tree symbol shown. Revise quantity to 1 Ll. Plans have been revised. Sheet C -6 - Revise the Proposed Plant Legend to indicate the botanical name abbreviation. ans have been revised. 12. heet C -6 - Proposed Plant Legend indicates 224 VO, but the plan only indicates 223 VO. Recount D and revise. Plans have been revised with the correct amount. J 13. Sheet C -6 - Terminal landscape island on the north side of the driveway only has 1 Ll. Either change out to a shade tree or add one Ll. One Ll has been added to the island. Parks and Recreation: 1 . No issues - commercial interior remodel. Stormwater: 1. The following shall be addressed prior to review by the Community Development Board: 1. No vertical wall on the pond shall be located next to the property line. Vertical wall has been moved to parking lot side of pond. 2. Show cross sections of all ponds showing all designed elevations, underdrain pipes and reflect exact existing and proposed elevations, not a typical type of cross sections. Cross sections are now shown on Sheet C -4. The following shall be addressed prior to the issuance of a building permit: 1. The 15' drainage easement provided is in an irregular shape and will be difficult to be described. Instead please show on the revised plan a 25' drainage easement measured from the northern property line over the existing ditch to be dedicated to the City of Clearwater. The drainage easement is now 25 foot from the property line. ORWENX R—r.vw APR 1 4 2000 Howard Civil Engineering, LLC 1601 yd Street South - Suite A St. Petersburg,�4t�i��X�!` IG NART ENT Office (727) 490 -1784 (Fax) 727 - 4J90 -1787 www.HowardCivi1Engineering.cor r11Y OF CaLV!N,;ATER 0 0 2. Provide soil analysis with seasonal high water table elevations at the ponds. This information is in the Geo- Tech report which has been included with this resubmittal. 3. Survey shall include 50' adjacent topography on the east and north of property lines and all finished floor elevations of adjacent properties located within this 50' area. The Owner /Applicant acknowledges that this information is required and will provided as soon as it is received from the surveyor. 4. Stormwater pipes located in the easement shall be reinforced concrete material. All pipes have been revised and are now RCP. 5. Off -site runoff needs to be addressed. Show on the plan the historical stormwater flow pattern. Pre - developed basin map showing flow has been included in the drainage report. 6. Show finished floor elevation of the existing building on -site and show the survey datum on the paving and grading plan. The finish floor elevation and the Survey Datum have been added to sheet C -4 7. Provide erosion control at the ditch where the outfall pipes discharge. Concrete rip -rap has been added to the outfalls. 8. Are the control structures of FDOT modified Type E? Detail sheet shows detail of City of Clearwater. Show separate detail for control structure A and B and show all designed elevations on the details. Callouts of control structures shall refer to their detail numbers. Control structures are FDOT Type 'C'. We have included details for each structure on sheet C -9 9. Concrete flume shall be provided at all 2' opening curb to prevent erosion. No flumes are required due to the change of the ponds retaining wall. 10. Show details for all storm structures including the flume detail and the mitered end sections. Details have been added to sheet C -9. 11. Control structures shall have skimmers. Please provide detail of skimmers. Details have been added to sheet C -9. 12. Based on the underdrain detail provided, the clearance between pond bottom and top of underdrain is 2', but the current design does not match the detail provided. Please verify this for accuracy. Detail has been revised. 13. Provide a copy of the approved SWFWMD permit. A copy of the SWFWMD permit will be submitted when received. 14. Please provide a revised drainage report and stormwater narrative reflecting the following changes and /or additional information: a) Soil analysis with seasonal high water elevations at the ponds b) Basin map showing the off -site runoff contribution to the site c) Correct dimension of drainage easement to be dedicated to the City d)' /2 " water quality calculations e) Existing impervious area can only be given 1/2 credit when calculating the runoff coefficient values (C) f) Verify the survey datum and update the Stage Storage Table's Elevation column accordingly. Stage storage table Elevation column shall be in smaller increments to reflect all the designed water elevations and their corresponding cumulative volumes. g) It is not clear whether a current design of control structures has weir. If so, please provide a weir design. Show that the flow rate of post development does not exceed the flow rate of the pre - development. 0rz*NN- AFR 11 4 2000 Howard Civil Engineering, LLC 1601 3rd Street South - 'Suite A St. Petersburg, Fti1��i:.� Office (727) 490 -1784 (Fax) 727 - 490 -1787 www.HowardCivi]Engineerina.com �zwR� ��1� r �`- C- pc�seei tER h) Provide the spaation supporting the permeability value, 0.42 feet/hour that was used in the drawdown analysis. The revised drainage report addresses comments 14 a -h which is included with this re- submittal. General note: 1. DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. Solid Waste: 1 . Please straighten out dumpster enclosure approach. Will not be able to service as shown. Dumpster enclosure has been revised to lessen the angle. Traffic Engineering: The following to be addressed prior to Building Permit: 1. On the handicapped sign detail change the Florida Statute to read "F.S. 318.18 ". Detail has been revised. 2. On the handicapped stall detail change the stall length to 18 feet. Detail has been revised. 3. Concrete steps are located in the loading zone. Please delete. Note has been added stating these are to be removed. General Note(s): 1) Applicant shall comply with the current Transportation Impact Fee Ordinance and fee schedule and paid prior to a Certificate of Occupancy (C.O.). Owner /Applicant acknowledges that is their responsibility for all fees. 2) DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may be forth coming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. Owner /Applicant acknowledges this. Plannin,�99--� (1. heet A -3 - East Elevation is really the West Elevation and vice versa. Revise titles on evations 1 and 3. Elevations have been revised. V2. On Page 7 of the application form, fill in the following: Acknowledgement of traffic impact study requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following): Traffic Impact Study is included. The study must include a summary table of pre- and post - development levels of service for all roadway legs and each turning movement at all intersections identified in the Scoping Meeting. Traffic Impact Study is not required. /Owner /Applicant has initialed the proper line on the re- submitted form. J 3. On all civil plans, show the location of all existing trees on -site and within 25 feet of the subject property (tree survey), including drip lines, and indicating which trees are proposed to be removed. Need to translate the small 8.5" x 11" plans showing the trees on -site and on the adjacent property to be preserved and to be removed on the larger civil sheets to allow for ease of reviewing impacts on other proposed improvements and proposed trees. All plan sheets now show the trees and their canopies. op'* ` x p_r-CM FIANNING Howard Civil Engineering, LLC 1601 3rd Street South - Suite A St. Petersburg, FL. 33701 P-t � ®� - C Office (727) 490 -1784 (Fax) 727 - 490 -1787 www.HowardCivilEngineering.com 4)Are there any public or okte easements on the property that could Oct the site design (survey was prepared without the benefit of a title search)? Response sheet from March 11, 2008, indicated the owner is to provide such information. J5. Sheet C -1 - Revise Site Data for the following: a. Proposed Building and structure heights (revise to that indicated in the request by Planning); Building height has been revised on the Cover Sheet. b. Proposed Impervious Area Ratio (indicated is 0.45, but if you add the proposed vehicle use area, building and sidewalk, it adds up to 0.537); Ratio has been revised on the Cover Sheet. c. Proposed Structure setbacks - Revise Front to 13.6 feet (to existing building), 16.3 feet (to proposed building) and 15 feet (to proposed pavement); Revise Side to 5 feet (south) (to existing building); Revise Rear to 10 feet (to proposed pavement); and Setbacks have been revised on the Cover Sheet. d. Proposed Use - Indicate Professional Offices and Medical Clinics Proposed use has been revised on the Cover Sheet. J6. Wheel stops are required for all parking spaces except the seven spaces east of the handicap parking spaces next to the building. Wheel stops have been added to the drawings. ®7 Sheet A -3 - Elevation 3 Side Elevation (West - really East) - Provide stucco color numbers on right hand side of elevation. Elevations have been re- labeled. Provide samples of proposed exterior building colors. Samples of colors are included with this resubmittal. J9. Provide reduced copy (8.5" x 11 ") rendered (colored) elevations. A colored copy is included with this resubmittal. 10. Provide reduced copy (8.5" x 11 ") rendered (colored) site plan (prefer landscape plan). This item is not available at the time of re- submittal and will be submitted at a later date. �11. Sheets C -3, C -4, C -5 and C -6 - Remove existing concrete ramp east of proposed interior stairs (landscape plan still shows the concrete ramp even though landscaping is also indicated in the same location). Notes have been added to plans to remove these items. f12. Dumpster size indicated on Sheet C -3 is not the same size as indicated by Detail #701 shown on Sheet C -7. Revise Sheet C -3. The enclosure has been revised to the proper size. J13. On Page 7 of the application form, fill in the following: Acknowledgement of fire flow calculations /water study requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following): Fire Flow Calculations/Water Study is included. Fire Flow Calculations/Water Study is not required. Owner /Applicant has initialed the proper line on the re- submitted form. J14. Page 1 of application - Description of Request - It is indicated that the building will be "approximately 11,000 sf'. We don't deal with "approximate" for site data. Provide correct information. Owner /Applicant has revised the application on the re- submitted form. f 15. All existing overhead utilities on -site must be placed underground with this proposal (place note on Sheet C -3). Note has been added to the drawings stating such. ltd!``. RE APR, 14 2006 Howard Civil Engineering, LLC 1601 P Street South - Suite A St. Petersburg, F n A37 Office (727) 490 -1784 (Fax) 727 - 490 -1787 www.Howard0vilEn 'Aw i. r.o �lryM1.t G`i7 d�f try "93ia� • • -/16. Sheets C -3, C -4, C -5 and C -6 - Need to address what is happening to the existing concrete steps east of the landing (to be removed ?). These steps encroach into the loading space. Notes have been added to plans to remove these items. v/1 7. Per Section 3- 1406.13, need to provide a minimum stacking distance from the front property line to the first parking space or drive aisle of 20 feet, based on the parking provided under this proposal. Alternately, to have the first parking space at a 15.84 -foot distance from the front property line, a specific traffic study must be submitted justifying the proposed reduction. The first parking space is approximately 46 feet from Fort Harrison Ave. through lane. This should allow stacking for 2 cars (see sheet C -3). ,/18. There are existing wood stairs adjacent to the south property line at the southwest corner of the existing building. Unclear the future need for such stairs. Are these stairs proposed to be removed? The stairs are to be removed. A note has been added to the plans stating such. f 19. There exists a wood foot bridge over the ditch on the north side. Is it intended to remain? The bridge is to be removed. A note has been added to the plans stating such. 120. Response to General Applicability criteria #1 - Response must discuss HOW the proposal meets the criteria (good information provided but it doesn't address the criteria). Owner /Applicant has revised the application on the re- submitted form. 21. Response to General Applicability criteria #2 - Unclear as to what "creating a business" means. If you mean that the building has been vacant and redeveloping the building that has been passed over to have medical clinics and offices in the building will not hinder the development or use of adjacent properties, say such. Owner /Applicant has revised the application on the re- submitted form. 22. Response to General Applicability criteria #3 - It is recommended to also add in the response how the redevelopment of the site reduces the number of driveways from two to one, which can be viewed as a safety improvement to pedestrians and motorists (since the right hand lane is merging left at this location). Owner /Applicant has revised the application on the re- submitted form. 23. Response to General Applicability criteria #4 - It is recommended to also add in the response how the redevelopment of the site reduces the number of driveways from two to one, which can be viewed as a safety improvement to pedestrians and motorists (since the right hand lane is merging left at this location), also minimizing traffic turning movements at this location. Owner /Applicant has revised the application on the re- submitted form. J 24. Response to Comprehenisve Infill Redevelopment Project criteria #3 - Response needs to address HOW the proposal is consistent with the surrounding properties, discussing the surrounding uses and scale of buildings. Owner /Applicant has revised the application on the re- submitted form. f25. Response to Comprehenisve Infill Redevelopment Project criteria #4 - Response should also discuss the benefits of this proposal, such as having a use in a building that has been vacant, with appropriate parking and landscaping improvements. Owner /Applicant has revised the application on the re- submitted form. 26. Response to Comprehenisve Infill Redevelopment Project criteria #5 - Response needs to describe in detail HOW this proposal: a. is compatible with the surrounding uses; b. will not substantially alter the essential use characteristics of the neighborhood; and c. will be a significant economic contributor. Owner /Applicant has revised the application on the re- submitted form. MMIIN RED o 711 APB'; ' 4 71P t 1ti��3at "jam i�i s CE�Y CAF Howard Civil Engineering, LLC 1601 3rd Street South - Suite A St. Petersburg, FL. 33701 Office (727) 490 -1784 (Fax) 727 - 490 -1787 www.HowardCivilEngineerina.com 9 0 27. Response to Comprehenisve Infill Redevelopment Project criteria #6 - Response must address, in detail, ALL of the criteria (a - e). - /Owner /Applicant has revised the application on the re- submitted form. 1� 28. As a heads -up issue, required egress from the second floor with two means of egress from all tenant spaces may be an issue. While this life- safety issue is really reviewed at the building permit stage, if there are issues that translate into additional stairs and required egress doors and sidewalks (which can affect required setbacks and landscaping), it is advisable to look into this issue now and make necessary revisions to the site /building plans. You may want to check with our Building Plans Examiners (Jeff Walker, 562 - 4567). The second floor area has been revised and now shows access to 2 remote exits. Should you need any further information, please don't hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, Michael Serrano Project Manager Howard Civil Engineering Mobile (813) 881 -1676 Howard Civil Engineering, LLC 1601 3id Street South - Suite A St. Petersburg, FL. 33701 Office (727) 490 -1784 (Fax) 727 - 490 -1787 www.HowardCivilEnoineering.com D Hiiiiiiiiiiii =H OW A R CIVIL ENGINEERING April 14, 2008 Mr. Wayne Wells City of Clearwater Planning Department 100 S. Myrtle Ave Clearwater, FL. 33758 Re: Flexible Development Application 1573 Ft. Hanson Office 1573 S. R. Harrison Avenue Dear Mr. Wells: Please find attached: One original and 14 copies of 1) Comments and responses to the previous submittal. 2) Flexible Development Application 3) Comprehensive Landscape Program Application 4) Drainage Report with Geo-Tech Report. 5) Vegetative Buffer Line drawing (Community Development Code Section3 -907) 6) Plans on 8'/2" x 11" 7) Site Plans. 8) Colored Elevation of building (8'/" x 11 °) 9) 14 Copies of Architectural Elevations and Floor Plans Should you need any further information, please don't hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, Trevor Howard, P.E Project Manager Howard Civil Engineering APR 14 2000 RANUG rRPAQ'T; ff 01 F CiF,AJ :4, Fir, Howard Civil Engineering, LLC 160130 Sheet South - Suite A St Petersburg, FL 33701 Oflroe (727) 490 -1784 (Fax) 727 490 -1787 www.HowardCivilEngineering.com • Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Sunday,. April 06, 2008 6:33 PM To: ' trevor @howardcivilengineering.com' Cc: 'trevor @howardengineering.net' Subject: FLD2008- 03007, 1573 S. Ft. Harrison. Avenue Trevor- 0 It was determined at the April 3, 2008, DRC meeting that the above referenced application was sufficient to move forward to the CDB.. As such, to be placed on the. 5/20/08 CDB. agenda, submit 15 collated copies of the revised plans & application material addressing all above, departments'. comments by noon, 4/14/08. Packets shall be collated, folded and stapled as appropriate. Wayne M. Wells, AICP Planner III City of Clearwater 100 South Myrtle. Avenue Clearwater, FL. 33756 -5520 Phone: 727 - 562 -4504 Fax: 727 - 562 -4865 0 Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Monday, March 31, 2008 6:49 PM . To: 'trevor @howardengineering.net' Cc: ' trevor @howardcivilengineering.com' Subject: FLD2008- 03007, 1573 S. Ft. Harrison Avenue Trevor- 9 Attached are the Draft DRC comments for the meeting to occur at 9:35 am on Thursday, April 3, 2008, in our offices. Should you have any questions, feel free to email or call me (562- 4504). Wayne M. Wells, AICP Planner III City of Clearwater 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, FL 33756 -5520 Phone: 727 - 562 -4504 Fax: 727 - 562 -4865 draft 4.3.08 c action agenda 0 1 0. Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2008 5:57 PM To: ' trevor @howardcivilengineering.com' Subject: FLD2008- 03007, 1573 S. Ft. Harrison Avenue Trevor- Attached is a Letter of Completeness for the above referenced application. The original is being mailed. Wayne M. Wells, AICP Planner III City of Clearwater 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, FL 33756 -5520 Phone: 727 - 562 -4504 Fax: 727 - 562 -4865 LL 0 i CITY OF CLE4RRWATER Clearwater PLANNING DEPARTMENT MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE: (727) 562 -4567 FAX: (727) 562 -4576 W W W.MYCLEARWATER. C OM March 13, 2008 Trevor Howard 1601 3rd Street S St Petersburg, F133701 VIA FAX: 727 - 490 -1787 RE: FLD2008 -03007 1573 S FT HARRISON AVE --Letter of Completeness Dear Trevor Howard: The Planning Staff has entered your application into the Department's filing system and assigned the case number: FLD2008- 03007. After a preliminary review of the submitted documents, staff has determined that the application is complete. The Development Review Committee (DRC) will review the application for sufficiency on April 03, 2008, in the Planning Department conference room - Room 216 - on the second floor of the Municipal Services Building. The building is located at 100 South Myrtle Avenue in downtown Clearwater. You will be contacted by the Planning Department's Administrative Analyst within one week prior to the meeting date for the approximate time that your case will be reviewed. You or your representative (as applicable) must be present to answer any questions that the DRC may have regarding your application. Additional comments may be generated by the DRC at the time of the meeting. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at 727 -562 -4504 or Wayne.Wells@myclearwater.com. . Sincerely yours, Wavne ells. AICP Planner III Letter of Completeness - FLD2008 -03007 - 1573 SFTHARRISONAVE H 0 W A R*D � CIVIL ENGINEERING March 11, 2008 Mr. Wayne Wells City of Clearwater Planning Department 100 S. Myrtle Ave Clearwater, FL. 33758 Re: Resubmittal of Flexible Development Application 1573 Ft. Harrison Office 1573 S. Ft. Harrison Avenue Below is a list of the city's comments along with or responses in bold italic. OR41" I,ECO R PLANNING- LZOW,'14FNIT Old OF CLEVNVER The current owner is Belleair Point Investments LLC. Until the ownership changes to 1573, LLC, the application form on Page 1 needs to list the current owner and an affidavit needs to be signed by the current owner authorizing Trevor Howard as the agent. Trevor Howard cannot sign the affidavit (must be the property owner). Later, when resubmitting to go to the CDB, the application form can be changed to show the new owner with a new affidavit signed by the new owner authorizing Trevor Howard as the agent. As per my Mr. Wayne Wells, the owner will deliver the recorded deed to the City offices on Friday March14,2008. 2. Provide floor plans for both floors. Site plan is confusing in relation to elevations submitted: a. Site plan indicates proposed stairs and entrance on the north side of the building. Elevation indicates stairs from the parking lot up to the entry but it is all shown as proposed building on the site plan. The plans have been revised to better distinguish the building areas from the sidewalks. b. Site plan indicates proposed stairs on the northwest comer of the building, but there is no stoop /sidewalk from this building addition (as required by Building Code). A sidewalk has been added to the stairs exist to the sidewalk running along the parking area. c. Site plan needs to show the handicap ramp design from the parking lot up to the finished floor of the building. The PGD Plan (Sheet C -4) now shows the deisgn/grading of the handicap ramp. 3. On all civil plans, show the location of all existing trees on -site and within 25 feet of the subject property (tree survey), including drip lines, indicating which trees are proposed to be removed. The requested tree information now appears on the Civil Plans and on the Survey. 4. Tree inventory needs to also show the trees within 25 feet of the subject property. The offsite trees have been added to the survey and the Landscape Plan Sheet C -6. Also, please see addendum to tree survey by qualified arborist. 5. On Sheet C -3, provide dimensions: a. from the property lines to the closest points of pavement. b. from the front property line to the closest point of the proposed stair addition. The requested dimensions have been added to the Site Plan Sheet C -3. r 6. Indicate on Sheet C -1 all required setbacks (note: Sheet C -1 lists "Building Setbacks ". We don't have "building setbacks" but have structure setbacks, as everything constructed is a structure needing to meet setbacks). What is listed may be the required landscape buffers, not setbacks. Required setbacks are: Front - 25 feet; Side - 10 feet; Rear - 20 feet. Also provide proposed setbacks. The setbacks have been revised as "Structure Setbacks" on the Cover Sheet C -1. The proposed setbacks is now stated. 7. While not Completeness issues, it is recommended to make the following changes on the plans to reduce /eliminate DRC comments: a. provide a handicap accessible path to the public sidewalk in the 5. Ft. Harrison Avenue right -of -way (extend the proposed sidewalk next to the building to the public sidewalk). b. Engineering and Fire will require a 30 -foot radius on each side of the driveway, not the flairs you show. The sidewalk has been extended and now connects to the existing sidewalk running along Ft. Harrison Ave. c. I count 45 proposed parking spaces, not 44. The correct number of spaces is 44. The plans have been revised to reflect this.. d. The minimum width of interior landscape islands is eight feet inside curbing (not six feet as indicated). The landscape island has been widened to 8'. 8. Show on Sheets C -3 and C -6 all required sight triangles, on both sides of the driveway (20'x 20') along the front property line and each side of the driveway). The site triangles have been revised and now appear on sheets C -3 and C -6. 9. Are there any public or private easements on the property that could affect the site design (survey was prepared without the benefit of a title search). The engineer knows of no known easements on the property. This will be verified by the owner. 10. Show the location of existing or proposed fire hydrants. There is a existing hydrant approximately 124 feet to the south of our building. This hydrant location now appears on sheet C -5 and the survey. 11. Need to show the location of all outdoor lighting fixtures. If only building mounted exterior lighting is anticipated, place a note on Sheet C -3 stating such. Sheet C -3 now has "Lighting Notes ". 12. Provide a SITE DATA TABLE for existing, required, and proposed development, in written /tabular form on Sheet C -1 (note - there are no existing or proposed dwelling units for the subject property). The standard "Site Data Table" from the application package has been added to the Cover Sheet C -1. 13. Sheet C -6 - Show the location, size, and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, indicated by a key relating to the plant schedule. The landscape plan is incomplete for the following: a. Buffers are to have one tree per 35 feet of property length and 100% shrubs per Section 3- 1202. D.1 The required trees /shrubs in the buffers are shown on the Landscape Plan Sheet C -6. b. Interior landscape ar as to have 1 free /i 50 square feet of r trred greenspace, shrubs making up 50% of the required greenspace and groundcover for the balance of the interior landscape area in lieu of turf per Section 3- 1202.E.1. Labels have been added to the interior landscape areas with the required landscaping for each island. See the Landscape Plan Sheet C -6. c. Foundation landscape area per Section 3- 1202.E.2 on the west side of the building (minimum of five feet in width) composed of at least two accent trees (or palm equivalents) or three palms for every 40 linear feet of building facade and one shrub for every 20 square feet of required landscaped area. A minimum of 50 percent of the area shall contain shrubs with the remainder to be ground cover. Foundation landscape area has been added to the west side of the existing building. d. Where any tree requirement is listed for a, b or c above, it is shade trees. Two accent trees = one shade tree; three palms (clustered) = one shade tree. The required trees are shown on the Landscape Plan Sheet C -6. e. Landscape plan needs to indicate the quantities of trees, shrubs and groundcover for each area of planting area. The Plant Legend provides a total quantity of each landsacape material proposed. Labels indicating the landscaping information have been added to each of the landscape areas. See the Landscape Plan Sheet C -6. 14. Provide irrigation notes. Sheet C -6 now has "Irrigation Notes ". 15. You indicate no signage proposed. Reality is, there will be a freestanding sign desired. Show on the all civil and landscape plans a proposed location of a freestanding (suggest a monument sign a maximum of six feet in height) sign (show it as a rectangle on the plans) at a minimum setback from property lines of five feet. Recommend to locate the sign where the landscaping can be properly placed so that view of the sign will not be blocked by proposed landscaping. A monument sign is being shown on the plans. The sign will be designed and permitted by others. 16. On Page 7 of the application form, fill in the following: Acknowledgement of traffic impact study requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following): Traffic Impact Study is included. The study must include a summary table of pre- and post - development levels of service for all roadway legs and each turning movement at all intersections identified in the Scoping Meeting. Traffic Impact Study is not required. Traffic Study is NOT required 17. On Page 7 of the application form, fill in the following: Acknowledgement of fire flow calculations /water study requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following): Fire Flow Calculations/Water Study is included. Fire Flow Calculations/Water Study is not required. OR*I Fire Flow Calculations/Water Study are NOT required RE- MAR 12 2008 pmtmo r.QwTUID-.1' CiN OF CL F�,l.t ATF1 0 Should you need any further information, please don't hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, Michael Serranl Project Manage Howard Civil Engineering Mobile (813) 789 -9166 OR *lam- RECD MAR 1.2 2008 PIANNING FORM E" ei OF CLEVI k't --- - - - - -- -- - -- -- - - - - -- HOWARD "r�rrrl CIVIL ENGINEERING March 3, 2008 Mr. Wayne Wells City of Clearwater Planning Department 100 S. Myrtle Ave Clearwater, FL. 33758 Re: Flexible Development Application 1573 Ft. Harrison Office 1573 S. Ft. Harrison Avenue Dear Mr. Wells: Please find the enclosed the development plans for the above mentioned property. The project requires a reduction to the front and rear setback lines where an existing building is within the required setbacks. Please find attached: One original and 14 copies of. 1) Application Form with Legal Description and Letter of Authorization attached. 2) Drainage Narrative and SWFWMD Application. 3) Tree Inventory. 4) Plans on 8'/2 x 11" 5) Site Plans. 6) Boundary and Topographic Surveys. 7) A check for $1,405,00 8) 14 Copies of Architectural Elevations and Floor Plans Should you need any further information, please don't hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, Trevor Howard, P.E Project Manager Howard Civil Engineering MAR 12 2008 OR OF LEWWAYR, Howard Civic Engineering, LLC 16013' Street South - Suite A St. Petersburg, FL 33701 Office (727) 490 -1784 (Fax) 727 - 490.1787 s,%4a,,% t !'osvardCroVEngux ting.com Wells, Wayne From: Melore, Donald Sent: Tuesday, March 11, 2008 12:10 PM To: 'trevor @howardcivilenginerring.com' Cc: ' mike @howard civil engineering.com'; Stone, John; Wells, Wayne Subject: FW: Clearwater Lift Station #29 Atlas Page:31313 Parcel: M & B 44 -20 Site address: 1573 South Fort Harrison Avenue Trevor, here is a reply from our Utility Manager in our Department. You will also need an approval from our Public Service Department before we accept an z pplication for review. You can get a hold of John. Stone at 562 -4960 ext #7224 to start that process. The owner /developer will need to obtain all applicable permits to install the proposed lift station for this site development. Donald Melone Engineering Specialist I Engineering Department City of Clearwater - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Fahey, Robert Sent: Tuesday, March 11, 2108 11:34 AM To: Melone, Donald Subject: Clearwater Lift Station #29 Don, I've accumulated some data for thn forcemain along Fort Harrison / Clearwater Largo Road that would potentially be tied into by the developer. Our record: indicate that the forcemain was constructed of 4" ductile iron in the State's right -of -way. The forcemain is approximately 804 feet in length starting from the pump station at elevation 30.3 and discharging to a manhole at elevation 40.9. Pump run times average just under 4 minutes with 40 cycles throughout an average day. Each pump run moves just over 400 gal ons .at approximately 2.5 feet per second and I would expect pressures midway through the line to be around 7 -8 psi... We do not have actual pressure readings at our stations. •c Weds, Wayne From: Trevor Howard [trevor @howardengineering.net] Sent: Tuesday, March 11, 2008 9:11 AM To: Wells, Wayne; trevor @howardcivilengineering.com Cc: wseifril@tampabay.rr.com Subject: RE: FLD2008- 03007, 1573 S. Ft. Harrison Avenue I understand Wayne, we will get it to you. - - - -- Original Message----- - From: Wayne. Wells @myCleaiwater.com [ mailto :Wayne.Wells @myClearwater.com] Sent: Monday, March 10, 2008 5:59 PM To: trevor @howardcivilengineering.com Cc: wseifril @tampabay.rr.com Subject: RE:,FLD2008- 03007, 1573 S. Ft. Harrison Avenue Trevor - If they are having a closing at 10 am on Friday, someone will be recording the deed, which I would assume would be later in the day on Friday. Assuming this to be correct, a copy of that recorded deed just needs to be dropped off to me. Don't know how much hunting you would need to do ( ?). Wayne - - - -- Original Message - - - -- - From: Trevor Howard [mailto :trevor @howardengineering.net] Sent: Monday, March 10, 2008 . 4:42 PM To: Wells, Wayne Cc: 'Ann & Wayne Seifried' Subject: RE: FLD2008- 03007, 1573 S. Ft. Harrison Avenue Yes, I think that will help. I will try and hunt down that recorded deed. Thanks for working with us on this Wayne. Trevor - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Wayne.Wells @myClear�aater.com [ mailto :Wayne.Wells @myClearwater.com] Sent: Monday, March 10, 2008 4:32 PM To: trevor @howardcivilengineering.com Subject: FLD2008- 03007, 1573 S. Ft. Harrison Avenue Trevor - It is our understanding that their closing is on Friday morning. We will allow this to not be a completeness issue, so long as we can get a copy of the recorded deed on Friday. Will that work? Wayne - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Trevor Howard [mai*,to :trevor @howardengineering.net] Sent: Monday, March 10, 2008 3:19 PM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: FW: FLD2008- 03007, 1573 S. Ft. Harrison Avenue Hi Wayne, The client has a request about the property ownership. Please see below. 1 c $ • Thanks - - - -- Original Message - - - -- From.: Ann & Wayne Seifri6d [ mailto :wseifril @tampabay.rr.com] Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2008 6:54 PM To: trevor @howardcivilengineering.com Subject: Re: FLD2008- 03007, 1573 S. Ft. Harrison Avenue Trevor, I will own the property @ 10 AM Fri 3/14. Can we tell Wayne to wait until then? The existing owner has been very difficult, tell-him that and we will have everything to him Friday? Wayne - - - -- Original Message - - - -- From: "Trevor Howard" <trevor @howardengineering.net> To: "'Ann & Wayne Seifried "' <wseifril @tampabay.rr.com> Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2008 2:50 PM Subject: FW: FLD2008- 030J7, 1573 S. Ft. Harrison Avenue > Hello Wayne, > Attached are the incompleteness comments which we will address. • Please see comment No 3. Please give me the current owners • information as they need to sign this application. > > Trevor Howard, P.E. • HOWARD CIVIL ENGINEERING, LLC • 1601 3rd St South Suite A • St Petersburg FL 33701 • Phone: 727 - 490 -1784 • Fax: 727 - 490 -1787 • Mobile: 727 -481 -5049 • http:/ /www.howardcivilengineering.com • - - - -- Original Message - - - -- • From: Wayne.Wells @myClearwater.com, • [ mailto :Wayne.Wells @myClearwater.com] • Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2008 2:34 PM • To: trevor @howardcivilengineering.com • Subject: FLD2008- 03007, 1573 S. Ft. Harrison Avenue > Trevor - • Attached is a Letter of Incompleteness for the above referenced • application.. • The original is being nailed. • Wayne M. Wells, AICP • Planner III • City of Clearwater • 100 South Myrtle Avenue • Clearwater, FL 33756 -5520 • Phone: 727 - 562 -4504 • Fax: 727 - 562 -4865 > <<letter of incompleteness 3.6.08.pdf>> 2 • No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Free Edition: Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.21.6/1315 - Release Date: 3/6/2008 9:07 AM Wells, Wayne From: Ann L Wayne Seifried [wseifri1 @tampabay.rr.com] Sent: Monday, March 10, 2008 6:19 PM To: Wells Wayne; trevor @howardcivilengineering.com Subject: Re: F - D2008- 03007, 1573 S. Ft. Harrison Avenue I'll make sure it happens. Wayne Seifried - - - -- Original Message -- -- From: <Wayne.Wells @myClearwater.com> To: < trevor @howardcivilenlineering.com> Cc: <wseifril @tampabay.rr.com> Sent: Monday, March 10, 2008 5:59 PM Subject: RE: FLD2008- .03007, 1573 S. Ft. Harrison Avenue Trevor - If they are having a closing at 10 am on Friday, someone will be recording the deed, which I would a3sume would be later in the day on Friday. Assuming this to be correct, a copy of that recorded deed just needs to be dropped off to me. Don't know how much hunting you would need to do ( ?) Wayne - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Trevor Howard [mailto :trevor @howardengineering.net] Sent: Monday, March 10, 2008 4:42 PM To: Wells, Wayne Cc: 'Ann & Wayne Seifried' Subject: RE: FLD2008- 03007, 1573 S. Ft. Harrison Avenue Yes, I think that will help. I will try and hunt down that recorded deed. Thanks for working with u3 on this Wayne. Trevor - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Wayne. Wells @myClear,aater..com [ mailto :Wayne.Wells @myClearwater.com] Sent.: Monday, March 10, 2)08 4:32 PM To.: trevor @howardcivilenSineering.com Subject: FLD2008- 03007, 1373 S. Ft. Harrison Avenue Trevor - It is our understanding tzat their closing is on Friday morning. We will allow this to not be a conpleteness issue, so long as we can get a copy of the recorded deed on Friday. Will that work? Wayne - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Trevor Howard [mailto :trevor @howardengineering.net] Sent: Monday, March 10, 2008 3:19 PM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: FW: FLD2008- 03007, 1573 S. Ft. Harrison Avenue Hi Wayne, 1 The client has 'a request about the property ownership. Please e below. Thanks - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Ann & Wayne Seifried [ mailto :wseifril @tampabay.rr.com]. Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2008 6:54 PM To: trevor@howardcivilengineering.com Subject: Re: FLD2008- 03007, 1573 S. Ft. Harrison Avenue Trevor, I will own the property @ 10 AM Fri 3/14. Can we tell Wayne to wait until then? The existing owner has been very difficult, tell him that and we will have everything tD him Friday? Wayne - - - -- Original Message - - - -- From: "Trevor Howard" <tr,�vor @howardengineering.net> To: "''Ann & Wayne Seifriel'" <wseifril @tampabay.rr.com> Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2008 2:50 PM Subject: FW: FLD2008- 03007, 1573 S. Ft. Harrison Avenue > Hello Wayne, > Attached are the incompleteness comments which we will address. • Please see comment No 1. Please give me the current owners • information as they need to sign this application. > > Trevor Howard, P.E. • HOWARD CIVIL ENGINEERIN -s, LLC • 1601 3rd St South Suite A • St Petersburg FL 33701 • Phone: 727 - 490 -1784 • Fax: 727 - 490 -1787 • Mobitile: 727- 481 -5049 • http:/ /www.howardcivilEngineering.com • - - - -- Original Message - - - -- • From: Wayne.Wells @myClearwater.com • [ mailto :Wayne.Wells @myClearwater.com] • Sent: Thursday, March 05, 2008 2:34 PM • To: tr evor @howardcivilengineering.com • Subject: FLD2008- 03007, 1573 S. Ft. Harrison Avenue > Trevor - • Attached is a Letter of Incompleteness for the above referenced • application. • The original is being mailed. • Wayne M. Wells, AICP • Planner III • City of Clearwater • 100 South Myrtle Avenue • Clearwater, FL 33756 -5'J20 • Phone: 727 - 562 -4504 • Fax: 727 - 562 -4865 > <<letter of incompleteness 3.6�08.pdf>> 2 No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Free Editi,)n. Version: 7.5.516 / Virus database: 269.21.6/1315 - Release Date: 3/6/2008 9:07 AM No virus found in this in :=ing message. Checked °by AVG. Version: 7.5.518 / Virus Database: 269.21.7/1322 - Release Date: 3/9/2008 12:17 PM 3 Wells, Wayne From: Ann 8 Wayne Seifried [wseifril @tampabay.rr.com] Sent: Mon&iy, March 10, 2008 5:58 PM To: trevor,dhowardcivilengineering .com; Wells, Wayne Subject: Re: FI.D2008- 03007, 1573 S. Ft. Harrison Avenue I'll get it to you right away. Wayne - - - -- Original Message -- -- From: "Trevor Howard" <tr,svor @howardengineering.net> To: <Wayne.Wells @myClearwater.com> Cc: "'Ann & Wayne Seifried'', <wseifril @tampabay.rr.com> Sent: Monday, March 10, 2008 4:42 PM Subject: RE: FLD2008- 03001, 1573 S. Ft. Harrison Avenue > Yes, I think that will .ielp. I will try and hunt down that recorded deed. > Thanks for working with us on this Wayne. > Trevor • - - - -- Original Message - - - - -- • From: Wayne.Wells @myClearwater.com [ mailto :Wayne.Wells @myClearwater.com] • Sent: Monday, March 10, 2008 4:32 PM • To: trevor @howardcivile)igineering .com • Subject: FLD2008- 03007, 1573 S. Ft. Harrison Avenue > Trevor - > • It is our understanding that their closing is on Friday morning. We will • allow this to not be a completeness issue, so long as we can get a copy of • the recorded deed on Friday. Will that work? > Wayne > • - - - -- Original Message - - - -- • From: Trevor Howard [mailto :trevor @howardengineering.net] • Sent: Monday, March 10, 2008 3:19 PM • To: Wells, Wayne • Subject: FW: FLD2008- 03)07, 1573 S. Ft. Harrison Avenue > Hi Wayne,. > The client has a reques= about the property ownership. Please see below. > Thanks • - - - -- Original Message - - - -- • From: Ann & Wayne Seifr' -ed [ mailto :wseifril @tampabay.rr.com] • Sent: Thursday, March OS, 2008 6:54 PM • To: trevor @howardcivileigineering.com • Subject: Re: FLD2008- 03)07, 1573 S. Ft. Harrison Avenue • Trevor, I will own the _)roperty @ 10 AM Fri 3/14. Can we tell Wayne to • wait • until then? The existing owner has been very difficult, tell him that and • we will have everything to him Friday? > Wayne > - - - -- Original Message - - -- 1 • From: "Trevor Howard" <t -revor @howardengineering.net> • To: "'Ann & Wayne Seifried "' <wseifril @tampabay.rr.com> • Sent: Thursday, March 05, 2008 2:50 PM • Subject: FW: FLD2008- 03)07, 1573 S. Ft. Harrison Avenue » Hello Wayne, >> Attached are the incom- Dleteness comments which we will address. » Please see comment No 1. Please give me the current owners » information as they need to sign this application. » Trevor Howard, P.E. » HOWARD CIVIL ENGINEERING, LLC » 1601 3rd St South Suir_e A » St Petersburg FL 33701 » Phone: 727 - 490 -1784 » Fax: 727 - 490 -1787 » Mobile: 727 - 481 -5049 » http:/ /www.howardcivilengineering.com » - - - -- Original Message - - - -- » From: Wayne.Wells @myClearwater.com » [ mailto :Wayne.Wells @my�learwater.com] » Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2008 2:34 PM » To: trevor@howardcivil,>ngineering.com Subject: FLD2008- 03007, 1573 S. Ft. Harrison Avenue » Trevor - >> Attached is a Letter of Incompleteness for the above referenced application. » The original is being mailed. » Wayne M. Wells, AICP » Planner III » City of Clearwater » 100 South Myrtle Avenue » Clearwater, FL 33756 -5520 » Phone: 727- 562 -4504 » Fax: 727 - 562 -4865 » <<letter of incompleteness 3.6.08.pdf>> > ------------------------------------------------ ----------------- ----------- > > No virus found in this incoming message. > Checked by AVG Free Edition. > Version: 7.5.516 / Virua Database: 269.21.6/1315 - Release Date: 3/6/2008 > 9:07 AM > No virus found in this .incoming message. > Checked by AVG. > Version: 7.5.518 / Viru.3 Database: 269.21.7/1322 - Release Date: 3/9/2008 > 12:17 PM 2 • Wells, `.Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Monday, March 10, 2008 4:32 PM To: ' trevor @howardcivilengineering.com' Subject: FLD2OO8- 03007, 1573S. Ft. Harrison Avenue Trevor - �1 It is our understanding that their closing is on Friday morning. We will allow this to not be a completeness issue, so long as we.can get a copy of the recorded deed on Friday. Will that work? Wayne - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Trevor Howard [ mailto :trevor @howardengineering.net] Sent: Monday, March 10, 2008 3:19 PM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: FW: FLD2008- 03007, 1573 S. Ft. Harrison Avenue Hi Wayne, The client has a request about the property ownership. Please see below. Thanks - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Ann & Wayne Seifried [ mailto :wseifril @tampabay.rr.com] Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2008 6:54 PM To: trevor @howardcivilengineering.com Subject: Re: FLD2008- 03007, 1573 S. Ft. Harrison Avenue Trevor, I will own the property @ 10 AM Fri 3/14. Can we tell Wayne to wait until then? The existing owner has been very difficult, tell him that and we will have everything to him Friday? Wayne - - - -- Original Message - - - -- From : "Trevor Howard" <trevor @howardengineering.net> To: "'Ann & Wayne Seifried "' <wseifril @tampabay.rr.com> Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2008 2:50 PM Subject: FW: FLD2008- 03007, 1573 S. Ft. Harrison Avenue > Hello Wayne, > Attached are the incompleteness comments which we will address. • Please see comment No 1. Please give me the current owners information as • they need to sign this application. > Trevor Howard, P.E. • HOWARD CIVIL ENGINEERING, LLC • 1601 3rd St South Suite A • St Petersburg FL 33701 • Phone: 727 - 490 -1784 • Fax: 727 - 490 -1787 • Mobile: 727 - 481 -5049 • http:/ /www.howardcivilengineering.com > > 1 • - - - -- Original Message - - -- • • From: Wayne.Wells @myClearwater.com [ mailto :Wayne.Wells @myClearwater.com] • Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2008 2:34 PM • To: trevor @howardcivilengineering.com • Subject: FLD2008- 03007, 1573 S. Ft. Harrison Avenue > Trevor - > • Attached is a Letter of Incompleteness for the above referenced • application. • The original is being mailed. • Wayne M. Wells, AICP • Planner III • City of Clearwater >. 100 South Myrtle Avenue • Clearwater, FL 33756 -5520 • Phone: 727 - 562 -4504 • Fax: 727 - 562 -4865 > > <<letter of incompleteness 3.6.08.pdf>> No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.21.6/1315 - Release Date: 3/6/2008 9:07 AM 2 Wells, Wayne From: Trevor Howard [trevor @howardengineering.net]. Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2008 3:14 PM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: RE: FLD2008- 03007, 1573 S. Ft. Harrison Avenue I understand, We will have it in before then. - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Wayne. Wells @myClearwater.com [ mailto :Wayne.Wells @myClearwater.com] Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2008 3:09 PM To: trevor @howardcivilengineering.com Subject: FLD2008- 03007, 1573 S. Ft. Harrison Avenue Trevor - I can only give until 9 am on Thursday, March 13th to stay on track to the April 3rd DRC meeting. Otherwise, the next deadline to submit would be noon on Thursday, April 10th to be on the May 1st DRC meeting. We have a schedule that we have to stick to. Wayne - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Trevor Howard [mailto :trevor @howardengineering.net] Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2008 2:47 PM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: RE: FLD2008- 03007, 1573 S. Ft. Harrison Avenue Thanks Wayne. Thanks for the comments. Any chance we can get a few days extention on that timeframe? I think the surveyors may need to go out again. Trevor Howard, P.E. HOWARD CIVIL ENGINEERING, LLC 1601 3rd St South Suite A St Petersburg FL 33701 Phone: 727 - 490 -1784 Fax: 727 - 490 -1787 Mobile: 727 - 481 -5049 http: / /www.howardcivilengineering.com - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Wayne.Wells @myClearwater.com [ mailto :Wayne.Wells @myClearwater.com] Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2008 2:34 PM To: trevor @howardcivilengineering.com Subject: FLD2008- 03007, 1573 S. Ft. Harrison Avenue Trevor - Attached is a Letter of Incompleteness for the above referenced application. The original is being mailed. Wayne M. Wells, AICP Planner III 1 w city of Clearwater 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, FL 33756 -5520 Phone: 727 - 562 -4504 Fax: 727 - 562 -4865 <<letter of incompleteness 3.6.08.pdf>> Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2008 2:34 PM To: 'trevor @howardcivilengineering.com' Subject: FLD2008- 03007, 1573 S. Ft. Harrison Avenue Trevor- r� u Attached is a Letter of Incompleteness for the above referenced application. The original is being mailed. Wayne M. Wells, AICP Planner III City of Clearwater 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, FL 33756 -5520 Phone: 727 - 562 -4504 Fax: 727 - 562 -4865 letter of >mpleteness 3.6 `Clearwater March 06, 2008 Trevor Howard 1601 3rd Street S St Petersburg: F133701 CITY OF CL ARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE: (727) 562 -4567 FAX: (727) 562 -4576 W W W.MYCLEARWATER. COM VIA FAX: 727 - 490 -1787 RE: FLD2008 -03007 -- 1573 S FT HARRISON AVE -- Letter of Incompleteness Dear Trevor Howard: The Planning Staff has entered your application into the Department's filing system and assigned the case number: FLD2008- 03007. After a preliminary review of the submitted documents, staff has determined that the application is Incomplete with the following comments. 1. The current owner is Belleair Point Investments LLC. Until the ownership changes to 1573, LLC, the application form on Page 1 needs to list the current owner and an affidavit needs to be signed by the current owner authorizing Trevor Howard as the agent. Trevor Howard cannot sign the affidavit (must be the property owner). Later, when resubmitting to go to the CDB, the application form can be changed to show the new owner with a new affidavit signed by the new owner authorizing Trevor Howard as the agent. 2. Provide floor plans for both floors. Site plan is confusing in relation to elevations submitted: a. Site plan indicates proposed stairs and entrance on the north side of the building. Elevation indicates stairs from the parking lot up to the entry but it is all shown as proposed building on the site plan. b. Site plan indicates proposed stairs on the northwest corner of the building, but there is no stoop /sidewalk from this building addition (as required by Building Code). c. Site plan needs to show the handicap ramp design from the parking lot up to the finished floor of the building. 3. On all civil plans, show the location of all existing trees on -site and within 25 feet of the subject property (tree survey), including drip lines, indicating which trees are proposed to be removed. 4. Tree inventory needs to also show the trees within 25 feet of the subject property. 5. On Sheet C -3, provide dimensions: a. from the property lines to the closest points of pavement. b. from .the front property line to the closest point of the proposed stair addition. 6. Indicate on Sheet C -1 all required setbacks (note: Sheet C -1 lists "Building Setbacks ". We don't have "building setbacks" but have structure setbacks, as everything constructed is a structure needing to meet setbacks). What is listed may be the required landscape buffers, not setbacks. Required setbacks are: Front - 25 feet; Side - 10 feet; Rear - 20 feet. Also provide proposed setbacks. Letter of Incompleteness - FLD2008 -03007 - 1573 S FT HARRISON A VE LL CITY OF CL ARWATER � ° e arwater PLANNING DEPARTMENT MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE: (727) 562 -4567 FAX: (727) 562 -4576 W W W.MYCLEARWATER. C OM March 06, 2008 7. While not Completeness issues, it is recommended to make the following changes on the plans to reduce /eliminate DRC comments: a. provide a handicap accessible path to the public sidewalk in the S. Ft. Harrison Avenue right -of -way (extend the proposed sidewalk next to the building to the public sidewalk). b. Engineering and Fire will require a 30 -foot radius on each side of the driveway, not the flairs you show. c. I count 45 proposed parking spaces, not 44: d. The minimum width of interior landscape islands is eight feet inside curbing (not six feet as indicated). 8. Show on Sheets C -3 and C -6 all required sight triangles, on both sides of the driveway (20'x 20' along the front property line and each side of the driveway). 9. Are there any public or private easements on the property that could affect the site design . (survey was prepared without the benefit of a title search). 10. Show the location of existing or proposed fire hydrants. 11. Need to show the location of all outdoor lighting fixtures. If only building mounted exterior lighting is anticipated, place a note on Sheet C -3 stating such. 12. Provide a SITE DATA TABLE for existing, required, and proposed development, in written/tabular form on Sheet C -1 (note - there are no existing or proposed dwelling units for the subject property). 13. Sheet C -6 - Show the location, size, and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, indicated by a key relating to the plant schedule. The landscape plan is incomplete for the following: a. Buffers are to have one tree per 35 feet of property length and 100% shrubs per Section 3- 1202.D.1. b. Interior landscape areas to have 1 tree /150 square feet of required greenspace, shrubs making up 50% of the required greenspace and groundcover for the balance of the interior landscape area in lieu of turf per Section 3- 1202.E.1. c. Foundation landscape area per Section 3- 1202.E.2 on the west side of the building (minimum of five feet in width) composed of at least two accent trees (or palm equivalents) or three palms for every 40 linear feet of building facade and one shrub for every 20 square feet of required landscaped area. A minimum of 50 percent of the area shall contain shrubs with the remainder to be ground cover. d. Where any tree requirement is listed for a, b or c above, it is shade trees. Two accent trees = one shade tree; three palms (clustered) = one shade tree. e. Landscape plan needs to indicate the quantities of trees, shrubs and groundcover for each area of planting area. The Plant Legend provides a total quantity of each landsacape material proposed. 14. Provide irrigation notes. Letter of Incompleteness - FLD2008 -03007 - 1573 S FT HARRISONAVE '` LL o P j�j�T CITY OF CL ARWATER C >_ Lal I,at�r PLANNING DEPARTMENT MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE: (727) 562 -4567 FAX: (727) 562 -4576 WW W.MYCLEARWATER.COM March 06, 2008 15. You indicate no signage proposed. Reality is, there will be a freestanding sign desired. Show on the all civil and landscape plans a proposed location of a freestanding (suggest a monument sign a maximum of six feet in height) sign (show it as a rectangle on the plans) at a minimum setback from property lines of five feet. Recommend to locate the sign where the landscaping can be properly placed so that view of the sign will not be blocked by proposed landscaping. 16: On Page 7 of the application form, fill in the following: Acknowledgement of traffic impact study requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following): Traffic Impact Study is included. The study must include a summary table of pre- and post- development levels of service for all roadway legs and each turning movement at all intersections identified in the Scoping Meeting. Traffic Impact Study is not required. 17. On Page 7 of the application form, fill in the following: Acknowledgement of fire flow calculations /water study requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following): Fire Flow Calculations /Water Study is included. Fire Flow Calculations /Water Study is not required. Section 4 -202 of the Community Development Code states that if an application is deemed incomplete, the deficiencies of the application shall be specified by Staff. No further development review action shall be taken until the deficiencies are corrected and the application is deemed complete. Please resubmit by noon on Wednesday, March 12, 2008. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at 727 -562 -4504 or Wayne.Wells@myclearwater.com. Sincerely yours, P1 . [ Wa e Wells Planner III Letter of Incompleteness - FLD2008 -03007 - 1573 S FT HARRISONAVE March 3, 2008 Mr. Wayne Wells City of Clearwater Planning Department 100 S. Myrtle Ave Clearwater, FL. 33758 Re: Flexible Development Application 1573 Ft. Harrison Office 1573 S. Ft. Harrison Avenue Dear Mr. Wells: =HOW A R P ■ CIVIL ENGINEERING Please find the enclosed the development plans for the above mentioned property. The project requires a reduction to the front and rear setback lines where an existing building is within the required setbacks. Please find attached: One original and 14 copies of: 1) Application Form with Legal Description and Letter of Authorization attached. 2) Drainage Narrative and SWFWMD Application. 3) Tree Inventory. 4) Plans on 8'/2 x 11" 5) Site Plans. 6) Boundary and Topographic Surveys. 7) A check for $1,405.00 8) 14 Copies of Architectural Elevations and Floor Plans Should you need any further information, please don't hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, Trevor Howard, P.E Project Manager Howard Civil Engineering OR*" RED MAR iA C17Y OF CLEPRAI,..b Howard Civil Engineering, LLC 16013b Street South - Suite A St. Petersburg, FL. 33701 Office (727) 490 -1784 (Fax) 727 - 490 -1787 www.Howard0vilEngineen-ng.com i r Wells, Wayne From: Sullivan, Patricia Sent: Tuesday, May 20, 2008 3:53 PM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: RE: CDB meeting Wayne - looks great - thanks for your help - Pat - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Tuesday, May 20, 2008 3:37 PM To: Sullivan, Patricia Cc: Watkins, Sherry; Delk, Michael Subject: CDB meeting Pat - Regarding the CDB approval of FLD2008 -03007 for 1573 S. Ft. Harrison Avenue, the Board added Condition #8 to be worded as such: 8. That, prior to the issuance of the building permit,, the building and accent colors be amended to conform to the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan Design Guidelines. If this is acceptable, please incorporate into the meeting minutes for this item. If not acceptable, please let me know quickly so that I can amend the Development Order being sent out tomorrow. Thanks. Wayne M. Wells, A/CP Planner III City of Clearwater 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, FL 33756 -5520 Phone: 727 - 562 -4504 Fax: 727 - 562 -4865 1 Page 1 of 1 Wells, Wayne. From:. nicholas fritsch [nfritsch @tampabay.rr.com] Sent:. Saturday, May 17, 2008.11:04 AM To:. Wells, Wayne Subject: 1573. S.. Ft Harrison Hi Wayne, Color palette: in my opinion, 3 bold accent colors is out of character with the neighborhood and neighboring facilities.. The ely low. in particular seems "out of place, ". out of character... not to mention out of good taste. I'm surprised the city accepted this... looks like the dental clinic at SE Missouri and. Court which I would hope we aren't trying to encourage more of. Nick 5/19/2008 • TO: Members of the Community Development Board FROM: Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Planner III 1�1 � RE: FLD2008- 03007, 1573 S. Ft. Harrison Avenue DATE: May 16, 2008 0 Upon further refinement of their proposal, the applicant desires to locate the air condensers on the ground on the east side of the building between the building and the retention pond and will screen the mechanical equipment in accordance with Code requirements. This location is acceptable to the Planning Department. Condition #4 has been amended to reflect this desired location: Conditions of Approval: 1. That the final design and color of the offices and medical clinic building be consistent with the conceptual elevations submitted to, or as modified by, the CDB; 2. That any future freestanding sign be a monument -style sign and be designed to match the exterior materials and color of the building. The maximum height shall be six feet, unless a higher sign is approved through a Comprehensive Sign Program; 3. That, prior to the issuance of any permits, the landscape plans be amended to ensure plant counts are correct; 4. That, prior to the issuance of any permits, plans show the location of proposed outdoor mechanical equipment and the required screening in accordance with Section 3- 201.1); 5. That, prior to the issuance of any permits, a Tree Preservation Plan prepared by a certified arborist, consulting arborist, landscape architect or other specialist in the field of arboriculture be submitted; 6. That, prior to the issuance of any permits, a maintenance easement be recorded in the public records for the ditch along the north property line; and 7. That, prior to the issuance of any permits, compliance with all requirements of General Engineering, Traffic Engineering and Stormwater Engineering be met. S. IPlanning Departmentl CD BIFLEX (FLD)(Pending cases)Up for the next CDBIFt. Harrison S 1573 Offices (C). -. 5.20.08 CDB -. WWIMemo to CDB re amended Condition #4 5.1608.doc CDB Meeting Date: Case Numbers: Agenda Item: Owner: Applicant: Representative: Address: May 20, 2008 FLD2008 -03007 E2 1573 LLC Wayne Seifried Trevor Howard, Howard Civil En 'neerin 1573 S. Ft. Harrison Avenue CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT GENERAL INFORMATION: CRIGINAL REQUEST: Flexible Development approval to permit offices and medical clinics in the Commercial (C) District with reductions to the front (west) setback from 25 feet to 13.6 feet (to existing building), 16.3 (to proposed building) and 15 feet (to proposed pavement), a reduction to the side (south) setback from 10 feet to five feet (to existing building), a reduction to the rear (east) setback from 20 feet to 10 feet (to proposed pavement) and an increase to building height from 25 feet to 26.33 feet for an entry parapet, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2- 704.C; and a reduction to the perimeter buffer along S. Ft. Harrison Avenue from 15 feet to 13.6 feet (to existing building), as a Comprehensive Landscape Program, under the provisions of Section 3- 1202.G. CURRENT ZONING: Commercial (C) District CURRENT FUTURE LAND Commercial General (CG) USE CATEGORY: PROPERTY USE: Current Use: Vacant warehouse -type building Proposed Use: Offices and Medical Clinics EXISTING North: Commercial (C) District Congregate Care SURROUNDING ZONING South: Commercial (C) District Restaurant AND USES: East: Commercial (C) District Assisted Living Facility West: Commercial (C) District Offices ANALYSIS: Site Location and Existing Conditions: The 0.96 acres is located on the east side of S. Ft. Harrison Avenue, approximately 500 feet north of Belleair Rd. The property is currently developed with a two -story warehouse type building that has been vacant for a number of years. There is no paved parking on the premises. There have been two times in the past where improvements have been made to the property without the benefit of building permits. Stop work orders were issued and later those improvements were removed. The first time unapproved improvements were made to the property in 2004 it was calculated that 37- inches of trees were also Community Development Board — May 20, 2008 FLD2008 -03007 —Page 1 of 10 • • illegally removed. The Planning Department withheld enforcement action on the illegal tree removal until a future development proposal where tree replacement could be handled with the other proposed site improvements. A restaurant is located to the south of this .subject property. Offices are located to the west across S. Ft. Harrison Avenue, with a County retention pond to the north of those offices. A congregate care facility is located to the north, while an assisted living facility is located to the east of the subject property. Development Proposal: The proposal is to redevelop. the site to permit offices and medical clinics. The existing building will be retained and stair and elevator additions will be constructed, as well as constructing a second floor in the building (presently primarily a two -story open space). Additionally, a paved parking lot, stormwater retention system and landscaping meeting Code requirements will be constructed. The building will be a total of 10,853 square feet in floor area (5,570 square feet first floor; 5,283 square feet second floor). A total of 44 parking spaces will be constructed, as well as a required loading space. A dumpster enclosure meeting Code requirements will be constructed in the northwest corner of the site. Two stormwater retention ponds will be constructed, one on the east side of the site and one on the north side of the site. There is an existing ditch along the north side of the site that the stormwater will outfall into. A wetland buffer is being provided along this ditch, meeting Code requirements, and an easement will be granted to the City for the maintenance of the ditch. The existing building is basically a two -story, bland, rectangular building. New stairs will be constructed on the northwest corner of the building (west and north sides) to allow egress from the second floor. New internal stairs will also be constructed adjacent to the building entry. A new entrance on the north side, including an elevator, will be constructed to provide access to the building from the parking lot. The existing exterior of the building will be re- stuccoed to provide a uniform appearance. New windows and doors will be cut into the windowless existing building to provide light into both floors of the offices. The exterior of the building will be painted primarily light and dark gray colors, with accents of a dark blue on the second floor level of the new stairwell on the northwest corner of the building and a medium - to -dark orange color on the second floor area of the eastern stairwell. A burgundy color will accent the entry area on the north side of the building. The request includes an increase to building height from 25 feet to 26.33 feet for only the parapet over the entry (the flat roof is at a height of 21.33 feet above the finished first floor). Floor Area Ratio: Pursuant to the Section 2- 701.1, the maximum floor area ratio (FAR) for properties with a designation of Commercial General (CG) land use is 0.55. The proposed FAR is 0.26. Based upon the above, the development proposal is consistent with the Countywide Future Land Use Plan with regard to the maximum allowable F.A.R. Impervious Surface Ratio (I.S.R.): Pursuant to Section 2 -701.1 of the Community Development Code, the maximum allowable I.S.R. is 0.95. The overall proposed I.S.R. is 0.54, which is consistent with the Code provisions. Minimum Lot Area and Width: Pursuant to Tables 2 -702 and 2 -703 of the Community Development Code, the minimum lot area for offices and medical clinics is 10,000 square feet. The subject property is 42,000 square feet in area. Pursuant to the same Table, the minimum lot width for offices and medical clinics is 100 feet. The lot width of this site along South Ft. Harrison Avenue is 280 feet. The proposal is consistent with these Code provisions. Community Development Board — May 20, 2008 FLD2008 -03007 — Page 2 of 10 • • Minimum Setbacks: Pursuant to Tables 2 -702 and 2 -703 of the Community Development Code, the minimum front setback for offices and medical clinics can range between 15 — 25 feet, the minimum side setback can range between zero — 10 feet and the minimum rear setback can range between 10 — 20 feet. The proposal includes reductions to the front (west) setback from 25 feet to 13.6 feet (to existing building), 16.3 (to proposed building) and 15 feet (to proposed pavement), a reduction to the side (south) setback from 10 feet to five feet (to existing building) and a reduction to the rear (east) setback from 20 feet to 10 feet (to proposed pavement). The existing building is located with a front (west) setback of 13.6 feet at the southwest corner of the building, which, being less than the minimum 15 feet allowable under Table 2 -704 (and less than the minimum standard of 25 feet), requires the processing of this application as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project. While this existing two -story building is somewhat imposing upon the view along the street, the proposal is to retain the building at this existing setback while retaining the existing trees in this area and install landscaping to help screen and buffer this existing structure. The existing, basically rectangular building is also located parallel with the south property line at a five -foot setback. The proposal is to retain the existing building at the existing five -foot side (south) setback, which is acceptable. Due to the location of this existing building at an angle to the front property line along South Ft. Harrison Avenue, the new stairwell to be constructed on the west side of the building will be set back 16.3 feet from the front property line. The proposed stairwell addition will, however, help break up the flatness of the western building fagade, while adding visual interest and providing required egress from the second floor. The proposed parking lot for this building will be located at the minimum 15 -foot front setback, which is also the minimum perimeter buffer along this street. Parking lots at this minimum 15- foot setback are common within the City. The parking lots for the restaurant to the south and the congregate care facility to the north are at a lesser setback than that proposed for this office /medical clinic building. The location of this proposed parking lot will provide adequate planting areas for the site landscaping. The proposal includes a reduction to the rear (east) setback to allow the proposed parking lot at a 10 -foot setback. This proposed rear setback is to a corner of the backup flair for the parking lot. Due to the design of the parking lot at an angle to the rear (east) property line, the southern portion of the parking lot meets the required rear setback. This rear parking area abuts the rear building areas and a wooded area of the adjacent assisted living facility. There is also a three -foot high retaining wall primarily on the assisted living facility property. The reductions to required setbacks can be viewed as necessary to provide a relevant site and building design, given the context of the site and contiguous uses. Maximum Building Height: Pursuant to Tables 2 -703 and 2 -704 of the Community Development Code, the maximum allowable height for medical clinics is 25 feet, while offices can range between 25 — 50 feet in height. The existing building height is 21.33 feet above the finished first floor, meeting Code requirements. The proposal includes an increase to building height from 25 feet to 26.33 feet for an entry , parapet. The increased height of the parapet is only at the entry area on the northern side of the building. This increased height provides building interest at the entrance to the building. The stair and elevator heights are permitted by the Code to be a maximum of 16 feet above the roof deck, which the proposal is minimizing the increased height for these portions of the building. The design of this project creates a form and function that will be consistent with and enhance the character of this area, as well as significantly enhancing the existing building design. Minimum Off - Street Parking: Pursuant to Tables 2 -703 and 2 -704 of the Community Development Code, the minimum required parking for offices is four parking spaces per 1,000 square feet, while the required parking for medical clinics is a range between 2 — 3 spaces per 1,000 square feet. The proposal meets the Code required parking for offices (the higher requirement), providing a total of 44 parking spaces at a ratio of four spaces per 1,000 square feet. The proposal also provides the required loading space on the east side of the building entry. The site design incorporates only one driveway on South Ft. Community Development Board — May 20, 2008 FLD2008 -03007 — Page 3 of 10 Harrison Avenue. The existing southern driveway will be reconfigured and moved northward, while the existing northern driveway will be removed as part of the site improvements. The reduction in the number of driveways will reduce potential hazards along this stretch of South Ft. Harrison Avenue, as the roadway is narrowing from a four -lane undivided roadway to the south to a two -lane divided roadway to the north of Belleair Rd. The outside lane adjacent to this site is merging to the left. The reduction in the number of driveways at this location will assist northbound motorists by having fewer access points where turning movements could interfere with this merging traffic. Mechanical Equipment: Pursuant to Section 3- 20LD.1 of the Community Development Code, all outside mechanical equipment must be screened so as not to be visible from public streets and/or abutting properties. The applicant is proposing mechanical equipment to be located on the roof of the building. At the time of building permit, the plans will need to show how the rooftop units will meet this requirement though screening measures. Any approval of this request should be conditioned on reviewing compliance with this requirement at the building permit stage. Sight Visibility Triangles: Pursuant to Section 3 -904.A of the Community Development Code, to minimize hazards at driveway intersections with South Gulfview Boulevard, no structures or landscaping may be installed which will obstruct views at a level between 30 inches above grade and eight feet above grade within 20 -foot sight visibility triangles. The proposed site and landscape design meet this requirement. Utilities: Pursuant to Section 3 -911 of the Community Development Code, for development that does not involve a subdivision, all utilities including individual distribution lines shall be installed underground unless such undergrounding is not practicable. The civil site plan for this proposal indicates that all on- site electric and communication lines will be placed underground in conformance with this Code requirement. Landscaping: Pursuant to Section 3- 12O2.D.1 of the Community Development Code, this site is required a 15 -foot wide landscape buffer along South Ft. Harrison Avenue, a 10 -foot wide landscape buffer adjacent to the assisted living facility to the rear of the property and adjacent to the congregate care facility to the north of the property, and a five -foot wide landscape buffer adjacent to the restaurant to the south. Buffers are to be planted with one (1) tree every 35 feet and 100% shrub coverage is required. The proposal includes a reduction to the perimeter landscape buffer along South Ft. Harrison Avenue from 15 feet to 13.6 feet (to existing building). The planting of the entire area between the west wall of the existing/proposed building and the front property line offsets the encroachment of this small triangular area of the building into the front landscape buffer. As noted above under the "Existing Conditions" section, the first time unapproved improvements were made to the property in 2004 it was calculated that 37- inches of trees were also illegally removed. The Planning Department withheld enforcement action on the illegal tree removal until a future development proposal where tree replacement could be handled with the other proposed site improvements. A number of existing oak trees are being preserved as part of this site design, on the west side of the building and the east and north sides of the site. Live oak and crape myrtle trees are being planted on -site along the frontage of South Ft. Harrison Avenue, as well as other interior landscape areas and perimeter buffers. The number and size of trees to be planted .complies with the tree replacement requirements due to the previous removal of trees in 2004. A Tree Preservation Plan prepared by a certified arborist, consulting arborist, landscape architect or other specialist in the field of arboriculture must be submitted prior to the issuance of any permits for this property. Community Development Board — May 20, 2008 FLD2008 -03007 — Page 4 of 10 The landscape design complies with the landscape code requirements for perimeter, foundation and interior landscaping and should provide visual relief to the building scale and location close to the front property line. Besides the proposed trees, Walter viburnum and dwarf yaupon holly shrubs will be planted in the perimeter, foundation and interior landscape areas. Parson's juniper groundcover will be planted in interior landscape areas and along the north side of the building. The proposed on -site landscaping complies with and exceeds Code requirements. Prior to the issuance of any permits, the landscape plan will need to be updated to ensure plant counts are correct. It should be noted that, in order to provide an adequate area for maintenance of the ditch along the north property line, the proposed landscaping is being placed close to the parking lot and retention pond. Additionally, there will be a gap in the landscaping next to the dumpster enclosure to provide access by maintenance equipment to this ditch area. Solid Waste: The proposal includes the provision of a Code compliant dumpster enclosure at the north end of the parking area in the northwest corner of the site. The proposal has been found to be acceptable by the City's Solid Waste Department. Signage: While no specific freestanding or attached signage is proposed at this time, the proposal anticipates a monument -style sign south of the driveway in front of the building. Freestanding signage at this location, and more specifically for the intended uses, would encourage a monument -style sign at a maximum height of six feet, unless a higher sign is approved through a Comprehensive Sign Program. Any future freestanding signage will need to be designed to match the exterior materials and color of the building. Code Enforcement Analysis: There are no outstanding Code Enforcement issues associated with the subject property. Community Development Board — May 20, 2008 FLD2008 -03007 — Page 5 of 10 • • COMPLIANCE WITH STANDARDS AND CRITERIA: The following table depicts the consistency of the overnight accommodation use development proposal with the standards as per Tables 2- 701.1, 2- 703 and 2 -704 of the Community Development Code: I See analysis in Staff Report Community Development Board — May 20, 2008 FLD2008 -03007 —Page 6 of 10 Standard Proposed Consistent Inconsistent Floor Area Ratio 0.55 0.26 X FAR I.S.R. 0.95 0.54 X Lot Area 10,000 s . ft. 42,000 X Lot Width 100 feet 280 feet X Setbacks Front: 15 — 25 feet 13.6 feet (to existing X1 building), 16.3 (to proposed building) and 15 feet (to proposed pavement) Side: 0 — 10 feet North: 22 feet (to X' pavement); 21 feet (to dum ster enclosure South: five feet (to existing X' building) Rear: 10 — 20 feet 10 feet (to proposed X' pavement) Height Medical clinics — 25 feet 21.33 feet (to flat roof - X' Offices — 25 — 50 feet above finished first floor) 26.33 feet (entry parapet - above finished first floor Off- Street Offices — 4 spaces /1,000 sf 44 spaces X Parking Medical clinic — 2 -3 spaces /1,000 sf 44 spaces based on offices ratio I See analysis in Staff Report Community Development Board — May 20, 2008 FLD2008 -03007 —Page 6 of 10 COMPLIANCE WITH FLEXIBILITY CRITERIA: The following table depicts the consistency of the development proposal with the Flexibility criteria as per Section 2 -704.0 of the Community Development Code (Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project): Consistent Inconsistent 1. The development or redevelopment is otherwise impractical without deviations from X the use and/or development standards set forth in this zoning district. 2. The development or redevelopment will be consistent with the goals and policies of X the Comprehensive Plan, as well as with the general purpose, intent and basic planning objectives of this Code, and with the intent and purpose of this zoning district. 3. The development or redevelopment will not impede the normal and orderly X development and improvement of surrounding properties. 4. Adjoining properties will not suffer substantial detriment as a result of the proposed X development 5. The proposed use shall otherwise be permitted by the underlying future land use X category, be compatible with adjacent land uses, will not substantially alter the essential use characteristics of the neighborhood; and shall demonstrate compliance with one or more of the following objectives: a. The proposed use is permitted in this zoning district as a minimum standard, flexible standard or flexible development use; b. The proposed use would be a significant economic contributor to the City's economic base by diversifying the local economy or by creating jobs; c. The development proposal accommodates the expansion or redevelopment of an existing economic contributor; d. The proposed use provides for the provision of affordable housing; e. The proposed use provides for development or redevelopment in an area that is characterized by other similar development and where a land use plan amendment and rezoning would result in a spot land use or zoning designation; or f. The proposed use provides for the development of a new and/or preservation of a working waterfront use. 6. Flexibility with regard to use, lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street X parking are justified based on demonstrated compliance with all of the following design objectives: a. The proposed development will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of the surrounding properties for uses permitted in this zoning district; b. The proposed development complies with applicable design guidelines adopted by the City; c. The design, scale and intensity of the proposed development supports the established or emerging character of an area; d. In order to form a cohesive, visually interesting and attractive appearance, the proposed development incorporates a substantial number of the following design elements: ❑ Changes in horizontal building planes; ❑ Use of architectural details such as columns, cornices, stringcourses, pilasters, porticos, balconies, railings, awnings, etc.; ❑ Variety in materials, colors and textures; ❑ Distinctive fenestration patterns; ❑ Building stepbacks; and ❑ Distinctive roofs forms. e. The proposed development provides for appropriate buffers, enhanced landscape design and appropriate distances between buildings. Community Development Board — May 20, 2008 FLD2008 -03007 — Page 7 of 10 • 0 COMPLIANCE WITH GENERAL STANDARDS FOR LEVEL TWO APPROVALS: The following table depicts the consistency of the development proposal with the General Standards for Level Two Approvals as per Section 3 -913 of the Community Development Code: SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION: The Development Review Committee (DRC) reviewed the application and supporting materials at its meeting of April 3, 2008, and deemed the development proposal to be sufficient to move forward to the Community Development Board (CDB), based upon the following findings of fact and conclusions of law: Findings of Fact: 1. The 0.96 acres is located on the east side of S. Ft. Harrison Avenue, approximately 500 feet north of Belleair Rd; 2. The property is currently developed with a two -story warehouse type building that has been vacant for a number of years, with no paved parking on the premises; 3. There have been two times in the past where improvements have been made to the property without the benefit of building permits, with those improvements later removed. When unapproved improvements were made to the property in 2004 it was calculated that 37- inches of trees were also illegally removed; 4. The proposal is to redevelop the site to permit offices and medical clinics; 5. The existing/proposed building will be a total of 10,853 square feet in floor area (5,570 square feet first floor; 5,283 square feet second floor), with stair and elevator additions to be constructed on the west and north sides of the existing building; 6. A total of 44 parking spaces will be constructed, meeting the Code required number of parking spaces for offices (the higher requirement of offices and medical clinics), as well as a required loading space; 7. The existing southern driveway will be reconfigured and moved northward, while the existing northern driveway will be removed as part of the site improvements, decreasing turning movements at this location where northbound lanes are merging thereby increasing safer future conditions; 8. The proposal includes reductions to the front (west) setback from 25 feet to 13.6 feet (to existing building), 16.3 (to proposed building) and 15 feet (to proposed pavement), a reduction to the side (south) setback from 10 feet to five feet (to existing building) and a reduction to the rear (east) setback from 20 feet to 10 feet (to proposed pavement); 9. The proposal is to retain the existing building, adding only a required egress stairwell on the west and north sides of the building and an elevator on the north side of the building; Community Development Board — May 20, 2008 FLD2008 -03007 — Page 8 of 10 Consistent Inconsistent 1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, X coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage development and use of X adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons X residing or working in the neighborhood. 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. X 5. . The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the X immediate vicinity. 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including X visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts on adjacent properties. SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION: The Development Review Committee (DRC) reviewed the application and supporting materials at its meeting of April 3, 2008, and deemed the development proposal to be sufficient to move forward to the Community Development Board (CDB), based upon the following findings of fact and conclusions of law: Findings of Fact: 1. The 0.96 acres is located on the east side of S. Ft. Harrison Avenue, approximately 500 feet north of Belleair Rd; 2. The property is currently developed with a two -story warehouse type building that has been vacant for a number of years, with no paved parking on the premises; 3. There have been two times in the past where improvements have been made to the property without the benefit of building permits, with those improvements later removed. When unapproved improvements were made to the property in 2004 it was calculated that 37- inches of trees were also illegally removed; 4. The proposal is to redevelop the site to permit offices and medical clinics; 5. The existing/proposed building will be a total of 10,853 square feet in floor area (5,570 square feet first floor; 5,283 square feet second floor), with stair and elevator additions to be constructed on the west and north sides of the existing building; 6. A total of 44 parking spaces will be constructed, meeting the Code required number of parking spaces for offices (the higher requirement of offices and medical clinics), as well as a required loading space; 7. The existing southern driveway will be reconfigured and moved northward, while the existing northern driveway will be removed as part of the site improvements, decreasing turning movements at this location where northbound lanes are merging thereby increasing safer future conditions; 8. The proposal includes reductions to the front (west) setback from 25 feet to 13.6 feet (to existing building), 16.3 (to proposed building) and 15 feet (to proposed pavement), a reduction to the side (south) setback from 10 feet to five feet (to existing building) and a reduction to the rear (east) setback from 20 feet to 10 feet (to proposed pavement); 9. The proposal is to retain the existing building, adding only a required egress stairwell on the west and north sides of the building and an elevator on the north side of the building; Community Development Board — May 20, 2008 FLD2008 -03007 — Page 8 of 10 0 0 10. The reductions to required setbacks can be viewed as necessary to provide a relevant site and building design, given the context of the site and contiguous uses; 11. The proposal includes an increase to building height from 25 feet to 26.33 feet for an entry parapet. The increased height of the parapet is only at the entry area on the northern side of the building. The existing building otherwise meets Code height requirements; 12. The proposal includes a reduction to the perimeter landscape buffer along South Ft. Harrison Avenue from 15 feet to 13.6 feet (to existing building). The planting of the entire area between the west wall of the existing/proposed building and the front property line offsets the encroachment of this small triangular area of the building into the front landscape buffer; 13. The number and size of trees to be planted complies with the tree replacement requirements due to the previous removal of trees in 2004; and 14. There are no outstanding Code Enforcement issues associated with the subject property. Conclusions of Law: 1. That the development proposal is consistent with the Standards as per Tables 2- 701.1, 2 -703 and 2- 704 of the Community Development Code; 2. That the development proposal is consistent with the Flexibility criteria as per Section 2 -704.0 of the Community Development Code; 3. That the development proposal is consistent with the General Standards for Level Two Approvals as per Section 3 -913 of the Community Development Code; and 4. The proposal is compatible with the adjacent land uses. Based upon the above, the Planning Department recommends APPROVAL of the Flexible Development application to permit offices and medical clinics in the Commercial (C) District with reductions to the front (west) setback from 25 feet to 13.6 feet (to existing building), 16.3 (to proposed building) and 15 feet (to proposed pavement), a reduction to the side (south) setback from 10 feet to five feet (to existing building), a reduction to the rear (east) setback from 20 feet to 10 feet (to proposed pavement) and an increase to building height from 25 feet to 26.33 feet for an entry parapet, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2- 704.C; and a reduction to the perimeter buffer along S. Ft. Harrison Avenue from 15 feet to 13.6 feet (to existing building), as a Comprehensive Landscape Program, under the provisions of Section 3- 1202.G, with the following conditions: Conditions of Approval: 1. That the final design and color of the offices and medical clinic building be consistent with the conceptual elevations submitted to, or as modified by, the CDB; 2. That any future freestanding sign be a monument -style sign and be designed to match the exterior materials and color of the building. The maximum height shall be six feet, unless a higher sign is approved through a Comprehensive Sign Program; 3. That, prior to the issuance of any permits, the landscape plans be amended to ensure plant counts are correct; 4. That, prior to the issuance of the building permit, building plans show screening of any rooftop mechanical equipment from view; 5. That, prior to the issuance of any permits, a Tree Preservation Plan prepared by a certified arborist, consulting arborist, landscape architect or other specialist in the field of arboriculture be submitted; 6. That, prior to the issuance of any permits, a maintenance easement be recorded in the public records for the ditch along the north property line; and 7. That, prior to the issuance of any permits, compliance with all requirements of General Engineering, Traffic Engineering and Stormwater Engineering be met. Community Development Board — May 20, 2008 FLD2008 -03007 — Page 9 of 10 w • Prepared by Planning Department Staff: " /�-I, �,& Wayne M. ells, AICP, Planner III ATTACHMENTS: ❑ Location Map ❑ Aerial Map ❑ Zoning Map ❑ Existing Surrounding Uses Map ❑ Photographs of Site and Vicinity S. IPlanning DepartmentlC D BIFLEX (FLD)IPending casesl Up for the next CDBIFt. Harrison S 1573 Offices (C) - 5.20.08 CDB - WWIFt. Harrison S 1573 StaJfReport.doc Community Development Board — May 20, 2008 FLD2008 -03007 —Page 10 of 10 0 0 LOCATION MAP Owner: 1 1573 LLC I Case: I FLD2008 -03007 Site 1573 S. Ft. Harrison Avenue Property I 0.96 Size(Acres): PIN: 1 21/29/15/00000/440 /2000 1 Atlas Page: 3136 0 0 0 0 — --I 37916 _J 4,pp157 3 1 2 1 3 2 1 1 s1 z 01514 1505 aao� 2 1510 ;D 1513 1506 O 1516 4 i 3 1510 1507 4 4 2.38 Ac NIP 15% 44/,2 1 0 Q Q 1515% q 516 — y 1511 5 1518 1528 152 aon411 A J Q � 4a,a 1525': 5 22 1y1y J � 6 � — 5 1528A 611s1 1534 15 N 1526 4an 15 A 15 4ana 15 6 1524 _ 7 N � Q �.i 15 7 1527 8 6 MDR ,540 1554 T 4an Q 1 �� 1528 so aa,s 15 8 — —' 9 T- 7 s HOWARD CT 9 1534 1535 10 95922 —1544 _ �.n r�� 1y69 4a,s na,a 10 1538 1537 11 22 23 NO 1.25 Ac1y� 2 1.76 Ac 11 1544 m 2 1541 1541X= 12 8 1548 1 1y _ 0 �L 1546 44 24 15 O avzs 1552 m rn �i � `� 4 30 0 rn� 1558 — 15 � � 4,pp157 \ 4 5 \ X5836 I 1560 — 1� c ; \ r \ 84348 1y1y 1 aa�, W 15 0 N 1y� h J 5a5 HOWARD CT 1 1580 _ 22 23 24 2 1584 3 1O 2 1O 1 1y _ 0 1590 3— _ 15 1yy8 ,� rn �i � `� 4 30 1594 1 • n. N-m ZONING MAP Owner: 1573 LLC Case: FLD2008 -03007 Site: 1573 S. Ft. Harrison Avenue Property 0.96 Size(Acres): PIN: 1 21/29/15/00000/440 /2000 1 Atlas Page: I 3136 0 0 1— -- $ I sl 1 1 2 Z916 --:j 1 2 3 1 2 1 I z 514 2 151�Q 1511 150`' D tachell 1513 e 508 a (j 1516 0 go, `N aam D a illih s _etj 4 z z Q 1515% 2.38 Ac Z a' aaiz 1 0 p 15 — 4 1518 1511 5 ti 1518 e0 Self 1528 Self r �„3 1 2 O r Storage ^� Q 1525 5 2 r 6 w _ - 1528A Storage 1534 oks) D � 3�r'f D vy d 1 44"sD 1 aGl> ed I 'QzK Tig-M-cMe-T Attached 1540 N v95 155 na , axis T A 1528 w 1 o a Weffing 0 9 � r- � 9 1534 1535 10 X95922 4 33/01 45y9 acne 10 1538 1537 11 ace 2A Dwellings N CongrA gate 11 4 1541 12 g 1548 4555 iet ntion °2 Clare 1% lling O Pond y X24 $ ,> � roup 1552 30 3 1 T aaz01 _ _2 ^^ 1558 1559 — 4 1560 4 F-- --1 eta 6 6 e15so Offices s \ X5836 — 6 aaizi \ 45 \ — Rest ant Assisted et C w 1157 l \ 84348 J 1 Living e W - — N 45$0 Facility r 5p5 HOWARD CT Ike �' c end 158 gall ngs Offices n h h 4590 — 1584 a 3 O , 1 459 U d eh CIC 3 1590 f 6 — U, ed'Ve ice Sales 459$ 01— 62478 el E 30 I iCe 30 1� ...:.:.... . .....:.:...... . ............ EXISTING SURROUNDING USES MAP Owner: 1573 LLC Case: FLD2008 -03007 Site: 1573 S. Ft. Harrison Avenue Property 0.96 Size(Acres): PIN: 21/29/15/00000/440 /2000 Atlas Page: 3136 View looking south at north and west sides cif the View looking east at north side of the subject View looking southeast at rear of the subject property and the adjacent senior living facility to the east 1573 S. Ft. Harrison Avenue FLD2008 -03007 View looking southeast at north side of the building on the subject property View looking northeast at the south side of the building on the subject properly (north of the adjacent restaurant — right side) Page 1 of 2 View looking east at restaurant at 1575 S. Ft. View looking west at offices at 520 Howard Ct. View looking northeast at offices at 1569 S. Ft. Harrison Ave directly north of the subject property 1573 S. Ft. Harrison Avenue FLD2008 -03007 t� • �" 'rte View looking south at used auto sales at 1594 S. Ft. Harrison Ave southwest of the subject property •��. i; is � � 9 View looking north at retention pond across S. Ft. Harrison Ave to the northwest of the subject property Page 2 of 2 Conditions. Associated With ffi FLD2008 -03007 1573 S FT HARRISON AVE Landscape Wayne. Wells, AICP 727 - 562 -4504 03/25/2008 5/6/08 - WW Include as a condition of approval to. ensure plant counts are correct. 4/21/0,8 - WW Recount VO and revise (I now count 220, but the Legend indicates 221). Counts should change based on other comment regarding southern buffer. 3/25/08 WW Sheet C -6. -. Proposed Plant Legend indicates 224 VO, but the plan only indicates 223 VO. Recount and revise. Land Resource Condition Rick Albee 727 - 562 -4741 03/28/2008 Provide a Tree Preservation Plan prepared by a certified arborist, consulting arborist, landscape architect or other specialist in the field of arboriculture. This plan must show how the proposed building, parking, stormwater and utilities impact the critical root zones (drip lines) of trees to. be preserved and how you propose to address these impacts i.e.; crown elevating, root pruning and /or root aeration systems. Other data required on this plan must show the trees canopy line, actual tree barricade limits (2/3 of the drip line and /or in the root prune lines if required), and the tree barricade detail. And any other pertinent information relating to tree preservation. Provide prior to building permit. Not Met Not Met Print Date: 05/12/2008 CaseConditons Page 1. of 1 • Wells, Wayne From: Albee, Rick Sent: Monday, April 21, 2008 2:40 PM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: RE: FLD2008- 03007, 1573 S. Ft. Harrison Avenue The one condition left to be met at building permit. - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Wells, Wayne. Sent: Monday, April 21, 2008 10:11 AM To: Albee, Rick Subject: FLD2008- 03007, 1573 S. Ft. Harrison Avenue Rick - 0 It does not appear that you have reviewed the resubmittal for this case. I have to set the CDB agenda today. Could you please review today? Thanks. Wayne M. Wells, A/CP Planner III City of Clearwater 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, FL 33756 -5520 Phone: 727 - 562 -4504 Fax: 727 - 562 -4865 IF_ . 9 Fax .Cover Memo CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT 100 SOUTH MYRTLE. AVENUE, 2ND FLOOR CLEARWATER, FL 33756 (727) 562 -4567 FAX: (727) 562 -4865 TO: OIL n- DATE: 4-h-1 n FAX: S la t- 1:9 3 9 TELEPHONE: Y�a 2 - 4 9 3 19 FROM: Wayne M. Wells TELEPHONE: (727) 562 -4504 SUBJECT: S NUMBER OF SHEETS (INCLUDING THIS PAGE): 2. F D (Ls 4086) !R 0.65 WALL CONC, RA N t Plat t C NG RETENTIpN pONp ' • - .�` • — h� \ EXISTING WOOD BRIDGE • �-_ .. , „�. • - Leo ENO TO BE REMOVED �.. \,.%b..` / • �.. �+ , , 10G h��- UNKNOWNWALL c�i i \� -_ + +'__ +�� -\�^' � . �_ - t.�,'C_+J"�-•: ��.. . •e :,, °��cC` \..\ \ ,�0. •��l7P.i,�\ '_\ ° 2'9'543.2, 78 "E 305.9c IN iBR10p FOOT \ \.\ •,• �.. L..__� 1 DUMP. _ /�. 1; °' +yY ENCL TR SIGSN EET \•�••• \\ �/ / ' ` � � � � i =/� REMOVEABLE BOLLARDS j TY 19 CONC. FLUSH CONC. �..� URB (TYP.) CURB i! e \ D % \ LINE e\ 0 STO 0 0 PERIMETER BUFFER \ `'c e•\ �.\ ~ N (CO TOR R/W INTERIOR INTEF \ my� •ti`?. ��e" \ ACENT USE) LANDSCAPE LAND \ o ss, r; e? - I SITE VISIBILITY AREA (164 SF) \ ° <F s.� TRIANG AREA TYPED' 1 a: \ lip, �• _�._ L;`- AIQA COMPLIANT RAMP -; INTERIOR / WITH DETECTABLE WARNING STRIPS rflrti LANDSCAPE \ – AREA (122 SF) �R y \ < °F STOP SIGN d LI LINE 1 •\ -� y ` 6° 1%�LLOW STRIPE n t✓j� m (R1 -1) O \ ° O ONUM T SIGN \ a 2- Of'-` ETECTABLE � J RMITTE BY WARNIINg SURFACE �° �o<o • Oo O ERS PER FDOTIJVDEX 304 ° GZ 24° WHITE $TOP BAR O.Gfl n Q TPA � oo�AV ENTRANCE\yAPABLE 0 �� OF STACKING 2 \ Wells, Wayne From: Watkins, Sherry Sent: Tuesday, April 15, 2008 2:18 PM To: Buzzell, William; Chase, Susan; Dougall- Sides, Leslie; DRC Members; Gluski, Roberta; Hollander, Gwen; Hufford, Diane; James Miller; Josuns, Sarah; Lutz, Deb; Patni, Himanshu; Reid, Debbie; Rickard, Leonard; Shell, Heather C.; US Post Office (E- mail); Vo, Phuong; Yellin, Catherine Subject: Resubmittals for the May 20, 2008 CDB Meeting Importance: High DRC Members, Plans for the following cases have been resubmitted for the May 20th, CDB meeting: FLD2008 -03008 - 711 CLEVELAND STREET Mariner Motel Renovation Planner: Robert Tefft FLD2008 -03006 - 1120 N BETTY LANE HEP Services Planner: Wayne Wells, FLD2008 -03007 -1573 S FT HARRISON AVE 1573 S FT HARRISON AVE OFFICE Planner: Wayne Wells I have placed one copy of the case resubmittal package on the cabinets outside of Room 216 in our office for your review (please do not take it, as we need it for the CDB mail out). Please review your comments /conditions for this case in Permit Plan and determine if they are met. Whether the conditions are "met" or still "not met," please affirm to me via email. Please have these cases reviewed, if possible by 12pm on Friday April 18, 2008, Thanks, Sherry Watkins Administrative Analyst Planning department 727 -562 -4582 9.3� am Case Number: FLD2008 -03 *- 1573 S FT HARRISON AVE • Owner(s): Belleair Point Investments Llc �► 3 101 Coronado Dr Clearwater, F133767 P TELEPHONE: No Phone, FAX: No Fax, E -MAIL: No Email Applicant Wayne Seifried 6988 1 st Avenue N St Petersburg , Fl 33710 TELEPHONE: 727 - 347 -3333, FAX: 727 - 343 -5763, E -MAIL: No Email Representative: Trevor Howard 1601 3rd Street S St Petersburg, 17133701 TELEPHONE: 727 - 490 -1784, FAX: 727 - 490 -1787, E- MAIL: trevor @howardcivilengineering.com Location:. 0.96 acres located on the east side of S. Ft. Harrison Avenue, approximately 500 feet north of Belleair Rd. Atlas Page: 313B Zoning District: C, Commercial Request: Flexible Development approval to permit offices and medical clinics in the Commercial (C) District with reductions to the front (west) setback from 25 feet to 13.6 feet (to existing building), 16.3 (to proposed building) and 15 feet (to proposed pavement), a reduction to the side (south) setback from 10 feet to five feet (to existing building), a reduction to the rear (east) setback from 20 feet to 10 feet (to proposed pavement) and an increase to building height from 25 feet to 26.33 feet for an entry parapet, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2- 704.C; and a reduction to the perimeter buffer along S. Ft. Harrison Avenue from 15 feet to 13.6 feet (to existing building), as a Comprehensive Landscape Program, under the provisions of Section 3- 1202.G. Proposed Use: Offices Neighborhood Clearwater Neighborhoods Coalition Association(s): Clearwater, F133763 1821 Springwood Cir S TELEPHONE: No Phone, FAX: No Fax, E -MAIL: No Email Neighborhood Harbor Oaks Neighborhood Assoc Association(s): Clearwater, 17133756 320 Magnolia Drive TELEPHONE: 461 -9657, FAX: No Fax, E -MAIL: No Email Presenter: Wayne Wells, Planner III Attendees Included: City: Wayne Wells, Neil Thompson, Scott Rice, Steve Doherty, Jim Keller, Wayne Butler, Rick Albee Applicant: Wayne Seifried, Gary Morrow, Mike Sorano The DRC reviewed this application with the following comments: General Engineering: 1 . Prior to the issuance of a building permit: 1. Resize dumpster pad area to meet requirements of City of Clearwater Contract Specifications and Standards, Part "C ", Construction Standards, Index #701. (Enclosure is 14' -8" wide x 10' -8" deep). Include Index #701 page 1/3 on details sheet. 2. Applicant shall obtain a City of Clearwater right -of -way permit for proposed driveway. 3. The proposed occupancies of the building include medical offices; consequently the applicant/owner will be responsible for all associated fees to install a required reduced pressure B.F.P.D. (back flow preventor device). Environmental:. 1 . Community Development Code Section 3 -907 requires a 15 foot vegetative buffer from the top of the bank of any creeks and channels for all construction activities, including parking lots. Modifiy plans to allow for a 15 foot vegetative buffer from the channel on the northside of the property. Prior to building permit: An Asbestos Survey is usually required prior to conducting any interior or exterior renovations. Please contact Mickey Crane at Pinellas County Air Quality (464 -4422) for further information. Development Review Agenda - Thursday, April 3, 2008 .- Page 8 DRC Action Agmda I.1 Fire: 0 All areas of all floors shall have access to 2 remote exits. the 2nd floor appears to be 2 seperate tennant spaces and shows access to only 1 stair from the space on the east side. Add an additional stair to correct this. Show on Plan PRIOR TO CDB Harbor Master: 1 . No issues. Legal: 1 . No issues. Land Resources: 1 . The Tree Inventory is inconsistent with the code grading system and there are some observations that I don't concure with. Set a field meeting to address prior to CDB. 2. Show all trees with their canopies, on all of the civil plans prior to CDB. 3. The proposed 1'-2'+/- cut is too close to trees #13 -15. Recommend revising the elevations and/or placing concrete "on grade" and providing and aeration system, Revise prior to CDB. 4. The proposed top of bank is too close to tree #17. Revise the TOB to be at least 15' away from the tree prior to CDB. 5. Trees #3,4,5 and 29 are shown to be preserved. Address the FM impact at these trees prior to CDB. 6. Provide a Tree Preservation Plan prepared by a certified arborist, consulting arborist, landscape architect or other specialist in the field of arboriculture. This plan must show how the proposed building, parking, stormwater and utilities impact the critical root zones (drip lines) of trees to be preserved and how you propose to address these impacts i.e.; crown elevating, root pruning and/or root aeration systems. Other data required on this plan must show the trees canopy line, actual tree barricade limits (2/3 of the drip line and/or in the root prune lines if required), and the tree barricade detail. And any other pertinent information relating to tree preservation. Provide prior to building permit. Landscaping: Development Review Agenda - Thursday, April 3, 2008 - Page 9 DRC Adi- Ag.da 1.1 1 . Since the existing *ding is located 13.6 feet from the front propeome; a Comprehensive Landscape Program application must be submitted to request the reduction of the front perimeter buffer from 15 to 13.6 feet. 2. Sheet C -4 - Indicate for the northern existing driveway apron and that portion of the existing southern driveway apron that are proposed to be removed must be sodded. 3 . Landscape buffers require 100% shrubs. Revise to show on the Landscape Plan the following: a. Suggest the front buffer along S. Ft. Harrison Avenue provide a tiered effect with shrubs, with the higher /taller shrubs in the back and the shorter shrubs in front; b. The south and east buffers need to be planted with shrubs; and c. Shrubs may be planted/are required within the visibility triangles, but must be maintained to maximum of 30- inches. 4. Sheet C -6 - Do not plant new trees under the canopy of existing trees. Relocate proposed trees. 5 . Required trees by Code are to be shade trees. Two accent trees (placed relatively close to each other to aggregate the same intended canopy) = one shade tree. Three palms (clumped together) = one shade tree. 6. Sheet C -6 - For interior landscape areas, shrubs making up 50% of the required greenspace and groundcover for the balance of the interior landscape area in lieu of turf are required, per Section 3- 1202.E.1. 7. Show interior landscape shading and square footages on Sheet C -3 rather than Sheet C -6, as it is difficult to read and/or read the proposed landscaping on Sheet C -6 with such shading. 8. Sheet C -6 - Plan is not clear, when correlated to the 8.5" x 11" tree inventory, as to which trees are being saved versus removed, including trees #9, 11, 12, 13, 15, 23, 29, 30 and 37. 9. The minimum required number of trees for this site, either through preserved trees or new trees, is based on the following: Perimeter: Front = 280'/35'= 8 trees; Side (N) = 306'/35'= 9 trees; Side (S) = 156'/35'= 4 trees; Rear = 140'/35'= 4.trees Foundation= 50740' = 1 tree Interior = 1528 sf /150 sf = 10 trees Total = 36 trees 10. Sheet C -6 - Directly west of the building, the symbol indicates 2 LI, but there is only one tree symbol shown. Revise quantity to 1 LI. 11 . Sheet C -6 - Revise the Proposed Plant Legend to indicate the botanical name abreviation. 12. Sheet C -6 - Proposed Plant Legend indicates 224 VO, but the plan only indicates 223 VO. Recount and revise. 13 . Sheet C -6 - Terminal landscape island on the north side of the driveway only has 1 LI. Either change out to a shade tree or add one LI. Parks and Recreation: 1 . No issues - commercial interior remodel. Stormwater: Development Review Agenda - Thursday, April 3, 2008 - Page 10 DRC Action Agenda 1.1 The following shJ*e addressed prior to review by the Communit0elopment Board: 1. No vertical wall on the pond shall be located next to the property line. 2. Show cross sections of all ponds showing all designed elevations, underdrain pipes and reflect exact existing and proposed elevations, not a typical type of cross sections. The following shall be addressed prior to the issuance of a building permit: 1. The 15' drainage easement provided is in an irregular shape and will be difficult to be describe. Instead please show on the revised plan a 25' drainage easement measured from the northern property line over the existing ditch to be dedicated to the City of Clearwater. 2. Provide soil analysis with seasonal high water table elevations at the ponds. 3. Survey shall include 50' adjacent topography. on the east and north of property lines and all finished floor elevations of adjacent properties located within this 50' area. 4. Stormwater pipes located in the easement shall be reinforced concrete material. 5. Off -site runoff needs to be addressed. Show on the plan the historical stormwater flow pattern. 6. Show fmished floor elevation of the existing building on -site and show the survey datum on the paving and grading plan. 7. Provide erosion control at the ditch where the outfall pipes discharge. 8. Are the control structures of FDOT modified Type E? Detail sheet shows detail of City of Clearwater. Show separate detail for control structure A and B and show all designed elevations on the details. Callouts of control structures shall refer to their detail numbers. 9. Concrete flume shall be provided at all 2' opening curb to prevent erosion. 10. Show details for all storm structures including the flume detail and the mitered end sections. 11. Control structures shall have skimmers. Please provide detail of skimmers. 12. Based on the underdrain detail provided, the clearance between pond bottom and top of underdrain is 2', but the current design does not match the detail provided. Please verify this for accuracy. 13. Provide a copy of the approved SWFWMD permit. 14. Please provide a revised drainage report and stormwater narrative reflecting the following changes and/or additional information: a) Soil analysis with seasonal high water elevations at the ponds b) Basin map showing the off -site runoff contribution to the site c) Correct dimension of drainage easement to be dedicated to the City d) '/2 " water quality calculations e) Existing impervious area can only be given 'h credit when calculating the runoff coefficient values (C) f) Verify the survey datum and update the Stage Storage Table's Elevation column accordingly. Stage storage table Elevation column shall be in a smaller increments to reflect all the designed water elevations and their corresponding cumulative volumes. g) It is not clear whether a current design of control structures has weir. If so, please provide a weir design. Show that the flow rate of post development does not exceed the flow rate of the pre - development. h) Provide the specification supporting the permeability value, K = 5.42 feet/hour that was used in the drawdown analysis. General note: 1. DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. Solid Waste: I . Please straighten out dumpster enclosure approach. Will not be able to service as shown. Traffic Engineering: Development Review Agenda - Thursday, April 3, 2008 - Page 11 DRC Action Agmda 1.1 1 . The following to *ddressed prior to Building Permit: 0 1. On the handicapped sign detail change the Florida Statute to read "F.S. 318.18 ". 2. On the handicapped stall detail change the stall length to 18 feet. 3. Concrete steps are located in the loading zone. Please delete. Planning: General Note(s): 1) Applicant shall comply with the current Transportation Impact Fee Ordinance and fee schedule and paid prior to a Certificate of Occupancy (C.O.). 2) DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. Development Review Agenda - Thursday, April 3, 2008 - Page 12 DRC Action Agmda 1.1 I . Sheet A -3 - East Eftion is really the West Elevation and vice vers0evise titles on Elevations 1 and 3. 2. On Page 7 of the application form, fill in the following: Acknowledgement of traffic impact study requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following): Traffic Impact Study is included. The study must include a summary table of pre- and post - development levels of service for all roadway legs and each turning movement at all intersections identified in the Scoping Meeting. Traffic Impact Study is not required. 3 . On all civil plans, show the location of all existing trees on -site and within 25 feet of the subject property (tree survey), including drip lines, indicating which trees are proposed to be removed. Need to translate the small 8.5" x 11" plans showing the trees on -site and on the adjacent property to be preserved and to be removed on the larger civil sheets to allow for ease of reviewing impacts on other proposed improvements and proposed trees. 4. Are there any public or private easements on the property that could affect the site design (survey was prepared without the benefit of a title.search)? Response sheet from March 11, 2008, indicated the owner is to provide such information. 5. Sheet C -1 - Revise Site Data for the following: a. Proposed Building and structure heights (revise to that indicated in the request by Planning); b. Proposed Impervious Area Ratio (indicated is 0.45, but if you add the proposed vehicle use area, building and sidewalk, it adds up to 0.537); c. Proposed Structure setbacks - Revise Front to 13.6 feet (to existing building), 16.3 feet (to proposed building) and 15 feet (to proposed pavement); Revise Side to 5 feet (south) (to existing building); Revise Rear to 10 feet (to proposed pavement); and d. Proposed Use - Indicate Professional Offices and Medical Clinics 6. Wheel stops are required for all parking spaces except the seven spaces east of the handicap parking spaces next to the building. 7. Sheet A -3 - Elevation 3 Side Elevation (West - really East) - Provide stucco color numbers on right hand side of elevation. 8. Provide samples of proposed exterior building colors. 9. Provide reduced copy (8.5" x 11 ") rendered (colored) elevations. 10. Provide reduced copy (8.5" x 11 ") rendered (colored) site plan (prefer landscape plan). 11 . Sheets C -3, C -4, C -5 and C -6 - Remove existing concrete ramp east of proposed interior stairs (landscape plan still shows the concrete ramp even though landscaping is'also indicated in the same location). 12. Dumpster size indicated on Sheet C -3 is not the same size as indicated by Detail #701 shown on Sheet C -7. Revise Sheet C -3. 13. On Page 7 of the application form, fill in the following: Acknowledgement of fire flow calculations /water study requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following): Fire Flow Calculations/Water Study is included. Fire Flow Calculations/Water Study is not required. 14 . " Page 1 of application - Description of Request - It is indicated that the building will be "approximately 11,000 sf'. We don't deal with "approximate" for site data. Provide correct information. 15. All existing overhead utilities on -site must be placed underground with this proposal (place note on Sheet C -3). 16. Sheets C -3, C -4, C -5 and C -6 - Need to address what is happening to the existing concrete steps east of the landing (to be removed ?). These steps encroach into the loading space. 17. Per Section 3- 1406.B, need to provide a minimum stacking distance from the front property line to the first parking space or drive aisle of 20 feet, based on the parking provided under this proposal. Alternately, to have the first parking space at a 15.84 -foot distance from the front property line, a specific traffic study must be submitted justifying the proposed reduction. 18. There are existing wood stairs adjacent to the south property line at the southwest corner of the existing building. Unclear the future need for such stairs. Are these stairs proposed to be removed? 19. There exists a wood foot bridge over the ditch on the north side. Is it intended to remain? 20. Response to General Applicability criteria #1 - Response must discuss HOW the proposal meets the criteria (good information provided but it doesn't address the criteria). Development Review Agenda - Thursday, April 3, 2008 - Page 13 DRC Action Agmda 1.1 21 . Response to Generr9pplicability criteria #2 - Unclear as to what 'Ang a business" means. If you mean that the building has been vacant and redeveloping the building that has been passed over to have medical clinics and offices in the building will not hinder the development or use of adjacent properties, say such. 22. Response to General Applicability criteria #3 - It is recommended to also add in the response how the redevelopment of the site reduces the number of driveways from two to one, which can be viewed as a safety improvement to pedestrians and motorists (since the right hand lane is merging left at this location). 23. Response to General Applicability criteria #4 - It is recommended to also add in the response how the redevelopment of the site reduces the number of driveways from two to one, which can be viewed as a safety improvement to pedestrians and motorists (since the right hand lane is merging left at this location), also minimizing traffic turning movements at this location. 24. Response to Comprehenisve Infill Redevelopment Project criteria #3 - Response needs to address HOW the proposal is consistent with the surrounding properties, discussing the surrounding uses and scale of buildings. 25. Response to Comprehenisve Infill Redevelopment Project criteria #4 - Response should also discuss the benefits of this proposal, such as having a use in a building that has been vacant, with appropriate parking and landscaping improvements. 26. Response to Comprehenisve Infill Redevelopment Project criteria #5 - Response needs to describe in detail HOW this proposal: a. is compatible with the surrounding uses; b. will not substantially alter the essential use characteristics. of the neighborhood; and c. will be a significant economic contributor. 27. Response to Comprehenisve Infill Redevelopment Project criteria #6 - Response must address, in detail, ALL of the criteria (a - e). 28. As a heads -up issue, required egress from the second floor with two means of egress from all tenant spaces may be an issue. While this life -safety issue is really reviewed at the building permit stage, if there are issues that translate into additional stairs and required egress doors and sidewalks (which can affect required setbacks and landscaping), it is advisable to look into this issue now and make necessary revisions to the site/building plans. You may want to check with our Building Plans Examiners (Jeff Walker, 562- 4567). Other: No Comments Notes: To be placed on the 5/20/08 CDB agenda, submit 15 collated copies of the revised plans & application material addressing all above departments' comments by noon, 4/14/08. Packets shall be collated, folded and stapled as appropriate. Development Review Agenda - Thursday, April 3, 2008 - Page 14 DRC Action Agenda 1.1 9.35 am Case Number: FLD2008 -03007 -- 1573 S FT HARRISON AVE Owner(s): Belleair Point Investments Llc 101 Coronado Dr Clearwater, F133767 TELEPHONE: No Phone, Applicant Wayne Seifried 6988 1st Avenue N • FAX: No Fax, E -MAIL: No Email Prke" 4.x.08 St Petersburg , F133710 TELEPHONE: 727 - 347 -3333, FAX: 727- 343 -5763, E -MAIL: No Email Representative: Trevor Howard 1601 3rd Street S St Petersburg, F133701 TELEPHONE: 727 - 490 -1784, FAX: 727 - 490 -1787, E- MAIL: trevor @howardcivilengineering.com Location: 0.96 acres located on the east side of S. Ft. Harrison Avenue, approximately 500 feet north of Belleair Rd. Atlas Page: 313B Zoning District: C, Commercial Request: Flexible Development approval to permit offices and medical clinics in the Commercial (C) District with reductions to the front (west) setback from 25 feet to 13.6 feet (to existing building), 16.3 (to proposed building) and 15 feet (to proposed pavement), a reduction to the side (south) setback from 10 feet to five feet (to existing building), a reduction to the rear (east) setback from 20 feet to 10 feet (to proposed pavement) and an increase to building height from 25 feet to 26.33 feet for an entry parapet, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2- 704.C; and a reduction to the perimeter buffer along S. Ft. Harrison Avenue from 15 feet to 13.6 feet (to existing building), as a Comprehensive Landscape Program, under the provisions of Section 3- 1202.G. Proposed Use: Offices Neighborhood Clearwater Neighborhoods Coalition Association(s): Clearwater, F133763 1821 Springwood Cir S TELEPHONE: No Phone, FAX: No Fax, E -MAIL: No Email Neighborhood Harbor Oaks Neighborhood Assoc Association(s): Clearwater, F133756 320 Magnolia Drive TELEPHONE: 461 -9657, FAX: No Fax, E -MAIL: No Email Presenter: Wayne Wells, Planner III Attendees Included: City: Wayne Wells, Neil Thompson, Scott Rice, Steve Doherty, Jim Keller, Rick Albee, Tom Glenn Applicant: Trevor Howard, Wayne Seifried The DRC reviewed this application with the following comments: General Engineering: 1 . Prior to the issuance of a building permit: 1. Resize dumpster pad area to meet requirements of City of Clearwater Contract Specifications and Standards, Part "C ", Construction Standards, Index #701. (Enclosure is 14' -8" wide x 10' -8" deep). Include Index #701 page 1/3 on details sheet. 2. Applicant shall obtain a City of Clearwater right -of -way permit for proposed driveway. 3. The proposed occupancies of the building include medical offices; consequently the applicant/owner will be responsible for all associated fees to install a required reduced pressure B.F.P.D. (back flow preventor device). Environmental: 1 . Community Development Code Section 3 -907 requires a 15 foot vegetative buffer from the top of the bank of any creeks and channels for all construction activities, including parking lots. Modifiy plans to allow for a 15 foot vegetative buffer from the channel on the northside of the property. Prior to building permit: An Asbestos Survey is usually required prior to conducting any interior or exterior renovations. Please contact Mickey Crane at Pinellas County Air Quality (464 -4422) for further information. Development Review Agenda - Thursday, April 3, 2008 - Page 8 DRC Action Agenda 1.1 • Fire: • 1 . All areas of all floors shall have access to 2 remote exits. the 2nd floor appears to be 2 seperate tennant spaces and shows access to only 1 stair from the space on the east side. Add an additional stair to correct this. Show on Plan PRIOR TO CDB Harbor Master: 1 . No issues. Legal: 1 , No issues. Land Resources: 1 . The Tree Inventory is inconsistent with the code grading system and there are some observations that I don't concure with. Set a field meeting to address prior to CDB. 2. Show all trees with their canopies, on all of the civil plans prior to CDB. 3 , The proposed 1' -2' +/- cut is too close to trees #13 -15. Recommend revising the elevations and/or placing concrete "on grade" and providing and aeration system, Revise prior to CDB. 4. The proposed top of bank is too close to tree #17. Revise the TOB to be at least 15' away from the tree prior to CDB. 5 . Trees #3,4,5 and 29 are shown to be preserved. Address the FM impact at these trees prior to CDB. 6. Provide a Tree Preservation Plan prepared by a certified arborist, consulting arborist, landscape architect or other specialist in the field of arboriculture. This plan must show how the proposed building, parking, stormwater and utilities impact the critical root zones (drip lines) of trees to be preserved and how you propose to address these impacts i.e.; crown elevating, root pruning and/or root aeration systems. Other data required on this plan must show the trees canopy line, actual tree barricade limits (2/3 of the drip line and/or in the root prune lines if required), and the tree barricade detail. And any other pertinent information relating to tree preservation. Provide prior to building permit. Landscaping: Development Review Agenda - Thursday, April 3, 2008 - Page 9 DRC Action Agcnda 1.1 1 , Since the existing uilding is located 13.6 feet from the front prope ine, a Comprehensive Landscape Program application must be submitted to request the reduction of the front perimeter buffer from 15 to 13.6 feet: 2. Sheet C -4 - Indicate for the northern existing driveway apron and that portion of the existing southern driveway apron that are proposed to be removed must be sodded. 3 , Landscape buffers require 100% shrubs. Revise to show on the Landscape Plan the following: a. Suggest the front buffer along S. Ft. Harrison Avenue provide a tiered effect with shrubs, with the higher /taller shrubs in the back and the shorter shrubs in front; b. The south and east buffers need to be planted with shrubs; and c. Shrubs may be planted/are required within the visibility triangles, but must be maintained to maximum of 30- inches. 4. Sheet C -6 - Do not plant new trees under the canopy of existing trees. Relocate proposed trees. 5 . Required trees by Code are to be shade trees. Two accent trees (placed relatively close to each other to aggregate the same intended canopy) = one shade tree. Three palms (clumped together) = one shade tree. 6. Sheet C -6 - For interior landscape areas, shrubs making up 50% of the required greenspace and groundcover for the balance of the interior landscape area in lieu of turf are required, per Section 3- 1202.E.1. 7. Show interior landscape shading and square footages on Sheet C -3 rather than Sheet C -6, as it is difficult to read and/or read the proposed landscaping on Sheet C -6 with such shading. 8. Sheet C -6 - Plan is not clear, when correlated to the 8.5" x 11" tree inventory, as to which trees are being saved versus removed, including trees #9, 11, 12, 13, 15, 23, 29, 30 and 37. 9. The minimum required number of trees for this site, either through preserved trees or new trees, is based on the following: Perimeter: Front = 280'/35'= 8 trees; Side (N) = 306'/35'= 9 trees; Side (S) = 156'/35'= 4 trees; Rear = 140'/35'= 4 trees Foundation = 50'/40'= 1 tree . Interior = 1528 sf/150 sf = 10 trees Total = 36 trees 10. Sheet C -6 - Directly west of the building, the symbol indicates 2 LI, but there is only one tree symbol shown. Revise quantity to 1 LI. 11 . Sheet C -6 - Revise the Proposed Plant Legend to indicate the botanical name abreviation. 12. Sheet C -6 - Proposed Plant Legend indicates 224 VO, but the plan only indicates 223 VO. Recount and revise. 13 . Sheet C -6 - Terminal landscape island on the north side of the driveway only has 1 LI. Either change out to a shade tree or add one LI. Parks and Recreation: 1 . No issues - commercial interior remodel. Stormwater: Development Review Agenda - Thursday, April 3, 2008 - Page 10 DRC Action Agenda I.l I . The following shalrbe addressed prior to review by the Community9ovelopment Board: 1. No vertical wall on the pond shall be located next to the property line. 2. Show cross sections of all ponds showing all designed elevations, underdrain pipes and reflect exact existing and proposed elevations, not a typical type of cross sections. The following shall be addressed prior to the issuance of a building permit: 1. The 15' drainage easement provided is in an irregular shape and will be difficult to be describe. Instead please show on the revised plan a 25' drainage easement measured from the northern property line over the existing ditch to be dedicated to the City of Clearwater. 2. Provide soil analysis with seasonal high water table elevations at the ponds. 3. Survey shall include 50' adjacent topography on the east and north of property lines and all finished floor elevations of adjacent properties located within this 50' area. 4. Stormwater pipes located in the easement shall be reinforced concrete material. 5. Off -site runoff needs to be addressed. Show on the plan the historical stormwater flow pattern. 6. Show finished floor elevation of the existing building on -site and show the survey datum on the paving and grading plan. 7. Provide erosion control at the ditch where the outfall pipes discharge. 8. Are the control structures of FDOT modified Type E? Detail sheet shows detail of City of Clearwater. Show separate detail for control structure A and B and show all designed elevations on the details. Callouts of control structures shall refer to their detail numbers. 9. Concrete flume shall be provided at all 2' opening curb to prevent erosion. 10. Show details for all storm structures including the flume detail and the mitered end sections. 11. Control structures shall have skimmers. Please provide detail of skimmers. 12. Based on the underdrain detail provided, the clearance between pond bottom and top of underdrain is 2', but the current design does not match the detail provided. Please verify this for accuracy. 13. Provide a copy of the approved SWFWMD permit. 14. Please provide a revised drainage report and stormwater narrative reflecting the following changes and/or additional information: a) Soil analysis with seasonal high water elevations at the ponds b) Basin map showing the off -site runoff contribution to the site c) Correct dimension of drainage easement to be dedicated to the City d) '/2 " water quality calculations e) Existing impervious area can only be given % credit when calculating the runoff coefficient values (C) f) Verify the survey datum and update the Stage Storage Table's Elevation column accordingly. Stage storage table Elevation column shall be in a smaller increments to reflect all the designed water elevations and their corresponding cumulative volumes. g) It is not clear whether a current design of control structures has weir. If so, please provide a weir design. Show that the flow rate of post development does not exceed the flow rate of the pre - development. h) Provide the specification supporting the permeability value, K = 5.42 feet/hour that was used in the drawdown analysis. General note: 1. DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. Solid Waste: 1 . Please straighten out dumpster enclosure approach. Will not be able to service as shown. Traffic Engineering: Development Review Agenda- Thursday,. April 3, 2008 - Page 11 DRC Action Agcnda 1.1 1 . The following to obeaddressed prior to Building Permit: • 1. On the handicapped sign detail change the Florida Statute to read "F.S. 318.18 ". 2. On the handicapped stall detail change the stall length to 18 feet. 3. Concrete steps are located in the loading zone. Please delete. Planning: General Note(s): 1) Applicant shall comply with the current Transportation Impact Fee Ordinance and fee schedule and paid prior to a Certificate of Occupancy (C.O.). 2) DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. Development Review Agenda - Thursday, April 3, 2008 - Page 12 DRC Action Agenda 1.1 1 . Sheet A -3 - East Alevation is really the West Elevation and vice versa - Revise titles on Elevations 1 and 3. 2. On Page 7 of the application form, fill in the following: Acknowledgement of traffic impact study requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following): Traffic Impact Study is included. The study must include a summary table of pre- and post - development levels of service for all roadway legs and each turning movement at all intersections identified in the Scoping Meeting. Traffic Impact Study is not required. 3 . On all civil plans, show the location of all existing trees on -site and within 25 feet of the subject property (tree survey), including drip lines, indicating which trees are proposed to be removed. Need to translate the small 8.5" x 11" plans showing the trees on -site and on the adjacent property to be preserved and to be removed on the larger civil sheets to allow for ease of reviewing impacts on other proposed improvements and proposed trees. 4. Are there any public or private easements on the property that could affect the site design (survey was prepared without the benefit of a title search)? Response sheet from March 11, 2008, indicated the owner is to provide such information. 5 . Sheet C -1 - Revise Site Data for the following: a. Proposed Building and structure heights (revise to that indicated in the request by Planning); b. Proposed Impervious Area Ratio (indicated is 0.45, but if you add the proposed vehicle use area, building and sidewalk, it adds up to 0.537); c. Proposed Structure setbacks - Revise Front to 13.6 feet (to existing building), 16.3 feet (to proposed building) and 15 feet (to proposed pavement); Revise Side to 5 feet (south) (to existing building); Revise Rear to 10 feet (to proposed pavement); and d. Proposed Use - Indicate Professional Offices and Medical Clinics 6. Wheel stops are required for all parking spaces except the seven spaces east of the handicap parking spaces next to the building. 7. Sheet A -3 - Elevation 3 Side Elevation (West - really East) - Provide stucco color numbers on right hand side of elevation. 8. Provide samples of proposed exterior building colors. 9. Provide reduced copy (8.5" x 11 ") rendered (colored) elevations. 10. Provide reduced copy (8.5" x 11 ") rendered (colored) site plan (prefer landscape plan). 11 . Sheets C -3, C -4, C -5 and C -6 - Remove existing concrete ramp east of proposed interior stairs (landscape plan still shows the concrete ramp even though landscaping is also indicated in the same location). 12. Dumpster size indicated on Sheet C -3 is not the same size as indicated by Detail #701 shown on Sheet C -7. Revise Sheet C -3. 13 . On Page 7 of the application form, fill in the following: Acknowledgement of fire flow calculations /water study requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following): Fire Flow Calculations /Water Study is included. Fire Flow Calculations /Water Study is not required. 14. Page 1 of application - Description of Request - It is indicated that the building will be "approximately 11,000 sf'. We don't deal with "approximate" for site data. Provide correct information. 15. All existing overhead utilities on -site must be placed underground with this proposal (place note on Sheet C -3). 16. Sheets C -3, C -4, C -5 and C -6 - Need to address what is happening to the existing concrete steps east of the landing (to be removed ?). These steps encroach into the loading space. 17. Per Section 3- 1406.13, need to provide a minimum stacking distance from the front property line to the first parking space or drive aisle of 20 feet, based on the parking provided under this proposal. Alternately, to have the first parking space at a 15.84 -foot distance from the front property line, a specific traffic study must be submitted justifying the proposed reduction. 18. There are existing wood stairs adjacent to the south property line at the southwest corner of the existing building. Unclear the future need for such stairs. Are these stairs proposed to be removed? 19. There exists a wood foot bridge over the ditch on the north side. Is it intended to remain? 20. Response to General Applicability criteria #1 - Response must discuss HOW the proposal meets the criteria (good information provided but it doesn't address the criteria). Development Review Agenda - Thursday, April 3, 2008 - Page 13 DRC Action Agenda 1.1 Notes: 21 . Response to Genera pplicability criteria #2 - Unclear as to what "creating a business" means. If you mean that the building has been vacant and redeveloping the building that has been passed over to have medical clinics and offices in the building will not hinder the development or use of adjacent properties, say such. 22. Response to General Applicability criteria #3 - It is recommended to also add in the response how the redevelopment of the site reduces the number of driveways from two to one, which can be viewed as a safety improvement to pedestrians and motorists (since the right hand lane is merging left at this location). 23 . Response to General Applicability criteria #4 - It is recommended to also add in the response how the redevelopment of the site reduces the number of driveways from two to one, which can be viewed as a safety improvement to pedestrians and motorists (since the right hand lane is merging left at this location), also minimizing traffic turning movements at this location. 24. Response to Comprehenisve Infill Redevelopment Project criteria #3 - Response needs to address HOW the proposal is consistent with the surrounding properties, discussing the surrounding uses and scale of buildings. 25 . Response to Comprehenisve Infill Redevelopment Project criteria #4 - Response should also discuss the benefits of this proposal, such as having a use in a building that has been vacant, with appropriate parking and landscaping improvements. 26. Response to Comprehenisve Infill Redevelopment Project criteria #5 - Response needs to describe in detail HOW this proposal: a. is compatible with the surrounding uses; b. will not substantially alter the essential use characteristics of the neighborhood; and c. will be a significant economic contributor. 27. Response to Comprehenisve Infill Redevelopment Project criteria #6 - Response must address, in detail., ALL of the criteria (a - e). 28 . As a heads -up issue, required egress from the second floor with two means of egress from all tenant spaces may be an issue. While this life -safety issue is really reviewed at the building permit stage, .if there are issues that translate into additional stairs and required egress doors and sidewalks (which can affect required setbacks and landscaping), it is advisable to look into this issue now and make necessary revisions to the site/building plans. You may want to check with our Building Plans Examiners (Jeff Walker, 562- 4567). Other: No Comments Development Review Agenda - Thursday, April 3, 2008 - Page 14 DRC Action Agmda L 1 Wells, Wayne From: Fresk, Sheryl Sent: Friday, March 28, 2008 1:53 PM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: FLD2008 -03007 Ell =9 AERIAL.doc EXISTING.doc LOCATION.do ZONING.doc Sheryl A. Fresk City of Clearwater Engineering Department (727)562 -4763 Ol Wells, Wayne • From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2008 12:11 PM To: Herman, Jason Subject: Map Request for FLD2008- 03007, 1573 S. Ft. Harrison Avenue Jason - Attached is a map request for Case FLD2008 -03007 for the property at 1573 S. Ft. Harrison Avenue. I will bring over the paperwork. The survey you may keep. Thanks- Wayne M. Wells, AICP Planner III City of Clearwater 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, FL 33756 -5520 Phone: 727 - 562 -4504 Fax: 727 - 562 -4865 FLD Map equest form.doc • • Flexible Development Application - Map Request. Planner Name: Wayne Wells Case Number: FLD2008 -03007 Date Requested: March 25, 2008 Date Requested for (date): April 8, 2008 Maps Requested X❑ Location Map X❑ Aerial Map X❑ Zoning Map X❑ Existing Surrounding Uses Map Required Documents to be submitted to Engineering X❑ Legal Description X❑ Survey X❑ Map with Proposed Site Highlighted Map Name Owner: j 1573 LLC Case: FLD2008 -03007 Site: I 1573 S. Ft. Harrison Avenue Property Size (Acres): 0.96 PIN: 21/29/15/00000/440 /2000 Atlas Page: 3136 i' Ile I H �.I �di hi Ii { due O+ D till na + R� .% rl "lee ® T . `. �'"•' + r I Cdr Z_- +^ A nP•'io 4 i e, O� t ' +n ©O NYIIY eC 1 `• LW� J f} � 1e+ p MDVAIID CT • b 6 00 D o w =I t6-"^1 �,, ater O PREPARED BY PUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATION ENGINEERING / GIS 100 S. Myrtle Ave., Clearwater, FL 33750 Ph.: (727)S52.4750, Fax: (727)528.4755 www.MyClearwator.com a fln� AN W� 1r,/ xD wa o mD S • efemfNMlOeTDETe MR A- U/ Dr.fl� tl+MY III :�an�K•n.°xae+ieiall"'"«Tw •IbtN lkm+PM ,MP CfMCOD•CpeyeyM�.M�� NrpDUMMCUnw•rYa, [MOOD . elntl FaYln IbgealmaCU�m+mn I' DDMNIIOftefTrim ePfON Uef peTelCTe T.TMm'fWIM xPIUMr�+T,pwypfy r.b.INeb�l D.Cems f. City Owned Property Agreement to Annex D Annexation o Deannexation Correction c Rezoning C] SUB NUMBER r • Refer to Plot) OBLOCK NUMBER OSUB PARCEL NUMBER OPARCEL NUMBER (Mae) LAND HOOK (COMMON OWNERSHIP) �- PLATTED SUBOMSION BOUNDARY Q COUNTY mmmAY Ll STATE WGHWAY U U.S. HIOMAY Outside City of Clearwater Zoning Atlas Mar 21, 2005 SE 114 or 21 -20.15 313B Wells, Wayne 0 From: Watkins, Sherry Sent: Monday, March 17, 2008 3:27 PM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: FW: Public Hearing Notification Mailing Labels for 1573 N Ft Harrison FYI Thanks Sherry Watkins Administrative Analyst Planning Department 727 -562 -4582 - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Gilmore, Stephanie Sent: Monday, March 17, 2008 3:25 PM To: 'gmorrow3 @tampabay.rr.com' Cc: Watkins, Sherry Subject: Public Hearing Notification Mailing Labels for 1573 N Ft Harrison Gary, Attached are the labels for public hearing notification for the above mentioned property. Please keep in mind that this information has yet to be approved to be heard by the Community Development Board. If approved, this information may change based on the amount of information we receive. We may have to notify more or less property owners. This list is not definite. Please feel free to call with any questions you may have. 1573 N Ft rison Ave Label Stephanie Gilmore City Clerk Specialist Office of Official Records & Legislative Services Phone: (727) 562 -4227 Fax: (727) 562 - 4086 Email: Stephanie .Gilmore @myclearwater.com s • • BELLEAIR POINT INVESTMENTS LLC BROWN, ELLEN L C N L RETIREMENT CORP 101 CORONADO DR 630 BRYANT ST 420 S ORANGE AVE # 500 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2429 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 2148 ORLANDO FL 32801 - 3399 CLEAR TRAILS MGMT INC COMMUNITY SERVICE FUND INC DONNELL, MICHAEL T 1650 CLEARWATER LARGO RD 925 LAKEVIEW RD DONNELL, SHIRLEY CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 1196 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3420 10454 SILHAVY DR LARGO FL 33774 - 5223 FAIRWINDS PROPERTIES INC FORD LIVING TRUST FORREST, DIANA R 1569 S FT HARRISON AVE 1932 JEFFORDS ST 637 BRYANT ST CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 2004 CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 4732 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 2147 GAY PRODUCTS INC GIANFILIPPO, PETER GIANFILIPPO, PETER 505 HOWARD CT STE 100 1594 S FORT HARRISON AVE 2167 BEECHER RD CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 1194 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 2074 CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 2224 GLOSUP, EDGAR DEAN III GRAY, JAMES G HAMMOND, MARK A 28249 RODGERS DR 1516 CARMEL AVE 1540 S MYRTLE AVE SANTA CLARITA CA 91350 - 3810 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 2150 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 2152 HAYNES, SHERYL M HOOPER, DAVID T HUNTER, DANIEL SHAUGHNESSY, PATRICK HOOPER, FRANCES C 1524 CARMEL AVE 46 N PINE CIR 1519 CARMEL AVE CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 2150 BELLEAIR FL 33756 - 1640 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 2149 HUTCHESON, DAVID D HUTCHINS, FERN G JOHNSON, RICHARD S HUTCHESON, WILLIAM C JR 1537 CARMEL AVE JOHNSON, JILL C 252 PINE RD CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 2149 635 BELLEAIR RD CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 1017 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 2106 KHALSA, DEVA KAUR KIMBERLY HOME INC MACIEJEWSKI, SUSAN J NIGHSWONGER, MONTE D 1189 NE CLEVELAND ST 1546 CARMEL AVE 1560 S MYRTLE AVE CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 4815 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 2150 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 2152 MUIRHEAD, JOSEPH G NELSON, DAVID L NELSON, JAN H II 1520 SADLON AVE 1544 CARMEL AVE 1522 SADLON AVE BELLEAIR FL 33756 - 2154 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 2150 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 2154 REDZOVIC, MUSTO NELSON, VIVIAN G P M L H C INC REDZOVIC, ZEUHRA 633 BRYANT ST 6060 LEELAND ST S 2202 DURANT CT CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 2147 ST PETERSBURG FL 33715 - 1638 VALRICO FL 33594 - 5301 • LJ RELIGIOUS COMNTY SVC INC SHAUGHNESSY, PATRICK J TORRES, DAMARIS SANCHEZ 503 S M L KING JR AVE HAYNES, SHERYL M TORRES, ESTEBAN CLEARWATER FL 33756 - PO BOX 1773 1541 CARMEL AVE LARGO FL 33779 - 1773 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 2149 WILKIE, CHRISTIAN 634 BRYANT ST CLEARWATER FL 33756 - CLEARWATER NEIGHBORHOOD COALITION JOE EVICH, PRESIDENT PO BOX 8204 CLEARWATER, FL 33758 WILLIAMS, JOSEPHINE 1538 CARMEL AVE CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 2150 HARBOR OAKS NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION BOB FRITZ , PRESIDENT 320 MAGNOLIA DRIVE CLEARWATER FL 33756 ZENJOY PROPERTIES LLC PO BOX 837 LARGO FL 33779 - 0837 w-% .sunbiz.org - Departme State • Page 1 of 2 Home Contact Us E- Filing Services Document Searches Forms H Previous on_.List Next on List Return To List No Events No Name History Entity Name: Detail by Entity Name Florida Limited Liability Company 1573, L.L.C. Filina Information Document Number L08000017735 FEI Number NONE Date Filed 02/19/2008 State FL Status ACTIVE Principal Address 6985 FIRST AVENUE NORTH ST. PETERSBURG FL 33710 Mailing Address 6985 FIRST AVENUE NORTH ST. PETERSBURG FL 33710 Reaistered Aaent Name & Address GASSMAN, ALAN S 1245 COURT STREET SUITE 102 CLEARWATER FL 33756 US Manaaer /Member Detail Name & Address Title MGR SEIFRIED, E. WAYNE JR. 6984 FIRST AVENUE NORTH ST. PETERSBURG FL 33710 Title MGR SEIFRIED, EDWARD 6984 FIRST AVENUE NORTH ST. PETERSBURG FL 33710 Title MGR http: / /www. sunbiz.org/ scripts /cordet.exe? action= DETFIL &inq_doc_ number= L080000l 773 ... 3/6/2008 wv .sunbiz.org - Departmei State • Page 2 of 2 BAHL, ROY 6985 FIRST AVENUE NORTH ST. PETERSBURG FL 33710 Annual Reports No Annual Reports Filed Document Images 02/1912008_ -- _Florida__ Limited_Lia..bility Note: This is not official record. See documents if question or conflict. Prev_.ious on._List Next._on List Return To List No Events No Name History u Entity Hamel; Home Contact us Document Searches E- Filing Services Forms Help Copyright and Privacy Policies Copyright 4) 2007 State of Florida, Department of State. http: / /www. sunbiz. org /scripts /cordet. exe? action= DETFIL &inq_doc_ number= LO80000 l 773 ... 3/6/2008 Piellas County Property Ap er Information: 21 29 15 00000 440 24 Page 2 of 5 21 / 29 / 15 / 00000 / 440 / 2000 05- Mar -2008 Jim Smith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 17:48:40 Ownership Information Non - Residential Property Address, Use, and Sales BELLEAIR POINT IHUESTMEHTS LLC OBK: 14115 OPG: 2048 101 CORONADO DR CLEARWATER FL 33767 -2429 EVAC: Hon -EUAC Comparable sales value as Prop Addr:.1573 S FT HARRISON AUE of Jan 1, 2007, based on Census Tract: 258.00 sales from 2005 - 2006: 0 Sale Date OR Book /Page Price (Qual /UnQ) Vac /Imp Plat Information 2 12,005 14,11512,048 450,000 (Q) I 0000: Book Pgs - 3 /2,004 13,437/1,827 387,000 (Q) I 0000: Book Pgs - 3 /2,003 12,628/ 788 210,000 (U) I 0000: Book Pgs - 12/1,993 8,522/ 312 170,000 (U) I 2007 Value EXEMPTIONS Just /Market: 426,000 Homestead: NO Ownership % .000 Govt Exem: NO Use %: .000 Assessed /Cap: 426,000 Institutional Exem: NO Tax Exempt: .000 Historic Exem: 0 Taxable: 426,000 Agricultural: 0 2007 Tax Information District: Cu Seawall: Frontage: Clearwater View: 07 Tax: 8,493.20 Land Size Unit Land Land Land Front x Depth Price Units Meth 07 Millage: 19.9371 1) 185 x 195 8. 50 42,050. 00 S 07 Spec Asmt: .00 2) 0 x 0 .00 .00 3) 0 x 0 .00 .00 Without the Save -Our -Homes 4) 0 x 0 .00 .00 cap, 2007 taxes will be : 5) 0 x 0 .00 .00 426, 000.00 6) 0 x 0 .00 . 00 Without any exemptions, 2007 taxes will be 8,493.20 Short Legal BEG 723.05FT S OF HW CDR OF LOT i LEONA SMITH'S SUB Description TH S 148FT TH S74DW 155.86 FT TO E R/W S FT HARRISON Building Information http:H 136 .174.187.131htbinlcgi- scr3 ?o =1 &a =l &b =1 &c =1 &r= .16 &s= 4 &t3 =1 &u= 0 &p= 21 +... 3/5/2008 Pinellas County Property Ap er Information: 21 29 15 00000 440 2160 Page 3 of 5 Property and Land Use Code descriptions 21 29 1 15 / 00000 440./ 2000 :01 05- Mar -2008 Jim Smith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 17:48:40 Commercial Card 01 of i Improvement Type: Warehouse Property Address: 1573 S FT HARRISON AUE Prop Use: 500 Land Use: 48 S-truc�ural E1�m�nts Foundation Spread /Mono Footing Floor System Slab Platform Height Exterior Wall Concrete Block Height Factor 24 . Party Wall None Structural Frame Masonry Pillar &Steel Roof Frame Reinforced Concrete Roof Cover Built Up /Composition Cabinet & Mill None Floor Finish Concrete Finish Interior Finish Masonry Total Units 0 Heating & Air None Fixtures 4 Bath Tile None Area Electric Average Description Factor Shape Factor Rectangle 1) Quality Average 1.00 Year Built 1,964 Effective Age 40 Other Depreciation 0 Function Depreciation 0 Economic Depreciation 0 Sub Aromas Comm EE! r+cial Extra FE3 aturIB s Description Dimensions Description Factor Area Year Description Factor Area 1) Base Area 1.00 5,404 7) .00 0 2) 'Office Area 1.75 456 8) .00 0 3) Canopy .20 16 9) .00 0 4) Loading Platform WD .40 180 10) .00 0 5) .00 0 11) .00 0 6) . 00 0 12) .00 0 Comm EE! r+cial Extra FE3 aturIB s Description Dimensions Price Units Value RCD Year 1) LOFT 1599 15.00 1,599 23,990 18,230 1,993 2) FENCE 112 11.00 112 1,230 1,020 2,001 3) .00 0 0 0 0 4) .00 0 0 0 0 5) .00 0 0 0 0 6) .00 0 0 0 0 TOTAL RECORD VALUE: 19,250 Map With Property Address (non- vacant) http: // 136 .174.187.13 /htbin/cgi- scr3 ?o =1 &a =1 &b =1 &c =1 &r= .16 &s= 4 &t3 =1 &u= 0 &p= 21 +... 3/5/2008 Pinellas County Property Ap'er Information: 21 29 15 00000 440 20 84,348 I Z3'0 44 1/8 Mile Aerial Photograph (2002) X25836 BEL6fAIh Page 4 of 5 http: // 136. 174 .187.13 /htbin/cgi- scr3 ?o =l &a =1 &b =1 &c =1 &r= .16 &s= 4 &t3 =1 &u= 0 &p= 21 +... 3/5/2008 ?i e�Ias County Property Pp er Infc-r_rzticn: 21 2� 15 0000C 440 * Page 5 of 5 Pinellas County Property Appraiser Pa reel Informatbn Eack to Search Pie An explanation of this screen http:P 136. 17r-.181.131htbinlzgi- sDr3 ?o =l&a=l &b =1 &�1 &r= .15 &s= 4&t3 =1 &u= 0oip =21 +_ . 3/5,'2008 Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Monday, February 18, 2008 10:32 AM To: 'trevor @howardcivilengineering.com' Subject: RE: 1573 South Ft. Harrison Avenue Trevor - The request will outline.the setback reductions. to both the existing building and to proposed pavement.. My recollection is that.the southwest corner of the building is less than 15 feet. from the front.property line, which makes the proposed office use needing to be submitted as a Comprehensive. Infill. Redevelopment Plan application... The existing building is. also less than 10 feet.to.the south side property line. From my recollection of the plans, the setback reductions. would be: Front: Reductions to the front (west) setback from 25 feet to xx feet (to existing building) and to. 15.feet (to pavement); Side: Reduction to the side (south) setback from 10 feet to xx feet (to existing building). Don't know if you need any landscape buffer reductions. The application fee is $1205.plus a $200 Fire Review fee (you only need one check). I will also forward to you a more.explanatory email regarding trees and replacement trees. Wayne - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Trevor Howard [ mailto :trevor @howardengineering.net] Sent: Monday, February 18, 2008 9:40 AM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: RE: 1573 South Ft. Harrison Avenue Hello Wayne. Can you please point to which variance /reduction we will be looking at. for this project? Remember we had our pre app about 2 weeks ago and the existing building was within the setback from FT Harrison. Also. what will the application fee be? Thanks - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Wayne.Wells @myClearwater.com [ mailto :Wayne.Wells @myClearwater.com] Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2008 8:21 AM To: trevor @howardengineering.net Cc: Rick.Albee @myClearwater.com Subject: 1573 South Ft. Harrison Avenue Trevor -, I understand that you will be coming in for a pre - development meeting with our BPRC tomorrow morning regarding the above property. For any redevelopment /development.proposal for this property, a total of 37. inches of tree replacement will.be required to be planted on -site due to trees illegally removed in 2004. You will probably hear this again tomorrow from Rick Albee, but I wanted to give you a heads -up. Wayne M. Wells, AICP Planner III City of Clearwater 1 100 South Myrtle. Avenue • Clearwater,. FL 33756 -5520 Phone: 727- 562 -4504 Fax: 727- 562 -4865 0 9 Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2008 3:32 PM To: 'davegibson @ij.net' Cc: M. Lisa Shasteen Esq. (E -mail) Subject: 1573 S. Ft. Harrison Avenue Dave - In 2004, trees were removed illegally without the benefit of an approved tree removal permit. Rick Albee, Land Resource Specialist with the Planning Department, calculated that the trees removed totaled 37 inches. In any future redevelopment/development of the subject property, a total of 37 inches of tree replacement will be required to be planted on -site to replace what was illegally removed. This 37 inches of tree replacement is part of, not in addition to, the tree inches required based on Landscape Code provisions. Landscape Code provisions require a certain number of trees within landscape buffers around the perimeter of the property, as well as within building foundation landscape areas and interior landscape areas within the parking lot. Following are some examples of potential scenarios with any redevelopment or development proposal: a. If a total of 52 inches of trees are required to be planted in compliance with these Landscape Code provisions, the 37 inches of tree replacement are part of these 52 required inches (note: this 52 inches is a made -up number being used for discussion purposes). If the landscape plan indicates all 52 tree inches being planted on -site, Code provisions are being met, as well as the tree replacement requirements. b. If, due to existing tree canopy (most likely within perimeter landscape buffers where there is a large existing tree canopy either from on -site trees or trees located on adjacent property), some of the 52 tree inches can't be physically planted on the subject property, then the tree inches that can't be planted would need to be paid into the City's tree bank at a rate of $48 per inch for the planting of trees elsewhere in the City on public property. Still the 37 inches of replacement tree is part of this 52 tree inches required, not in addition to the required amount of tree inches. Again, for discussion purposes, if only 30 tree inches can be physically planted on the site where 52 tree inches is required, then payment into the City's tree bank would be 22 inches x $48 per inch = $1,056. (Note: This latter part regarding payment into the City's tree bank may be different than what we just discussed on the phone. I confirmed my math in this email with other planners to ensure consistency of interpretation as to any deficits and the tree bank payment). If you have any.additional questions, feel free to contact me by email or by phone. Wayne M. Wells, AICP Planner III City of Clearwater 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, FL 33756 -5520 Phone: 727 - 562 -4504 Fax: 727 - 562 -4865 • Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2008 8:21 AM To: 'trevor @howardengineering.net' Cc: Albee, Rick Subject: 1573 South Ft. Harrison Avenue Trevor - 0 I understand that you will be coming in for a pre - development meeting with our BPRC tomorrow morning regarding the above property. For any redevelopment/development proposal for this property, a total of 37 inches of tree replacement will be required to be planted on -site due to trees illegally removed in 2004. You will probably hear this again tomorrow from Rick Albee, but I wanted to give you a heads -up. Wayne M.. Wells, AICP Planner III City of Clearwater 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, FL 33756 -5520 Phone: 727 - 562 -4504 Fax: 727 - 562 -4865 • Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2008 8:16 AM To: M. Lisa Shasteen Esq. (E -mail) Subject: 1573 South Ft. Harrison Avenue Lisa - • I apologize for not getting back to you sooner regarding the above property. I have had Kyle Wilson in our Development Services Department review the violation records regarding building permits and there are no current violations and all prior issues have been resolved for this property. I have also had Rick Albee determine the amount of tree inches illegally removed in 2004 and there will be 37 inches of tree replacement required to be planted on -site with any redevelopment/development proposal to replace what was illegally removed. I understand that Trevor Howard, engineer, is coming in for a pre - development meeting regarding this property tomorrow. If I can help in any other way, let me know. Hope to see you soon. Wayne M. Wells, A/CP Planner III City of Clearwater 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, FL 33756 -5520 Phone: 727 - 562 -4504 Fax: 727 - 562 -4865 0 0 Wells, Wayne From: Albee, Rick Sent: Tuesday, January 29,. 2008 9:36 AM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: RE: 1573 S. Ft. Harrison Avenue It appears to be 37 ". unless. additional. trees were removed since. my last site. assessment in 2003. - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Friday, January 11, 2008 7:30 AM To: Albee, Rick Subject: 1573 S. Ft. Harrison Avenue Rick - Could you please calculate the inches of tree to be replaced on this site due to the illegal removal of trees in 2004 (see AAAA All Photos on the S Drive for this address)? I need to let the owner's agent know soon. Thanks. Wayne Page 1 of 1 Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2008 11:28 AM To: 'trevor @howardengineering.net' Cc: Garriott, Kevin Subject: Property at 1573 South Fort Harrison Avenue . Trevor- Such a meeting would occur with what is called the Building Permit Review Committee (BPRC), where all City departments are represented to review /discuss as a pre - application a proposed development. To schedule a meeting with the BPRC, which occurs every Wednesday, call Kevin Garriott at 562- 4567. Wayne - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Trevor Howard [mailto :trevor @howardengineering.net] Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2008 10:44 AM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: Property on 1573 South Fort Harrison Hello Wayne, I represent a developer who want to develop the property listed above. The developer asked me to set up a pre application meeting with the City where all departments will review and comment on a concept plan so that we may know what to expect from the city as we move forward.. Do we set this meeting up with your department? Thanks Trevor Howard, P.E. Howard Civil Engineering LLC ph: 727 - 490 -1784 fax: 727 -490 -1787 cell: 727 - 481 -5049 5/11/2008 r � Wells, Wayne From: M. Lisa Shasteen [shasteen @tampabay.rr.com] Sent: Sunday, March 04,. 2007 6:38 PM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: RE: 1573 S. Ft. Harrison Avenue I know. I. know. We'll do something. here. Appreciate the head's up,.as.we don't want those folks on our property either. M. Lisa Shasteen, Esq. Lic. Real.Estate Broker THE SHASTEEN- SIZEMORE CO. "The Choice of.Smarter.Clients" My business is. 100%.by referral.. If you know of anyone ready to buy or sell property - of any size - L would appreciate your,telling.them about me so I can help them! Phone: (813) 220 -3000 Toll Free: (888) 880 -8558 Fax: (813) 283 -0677 Direct Fax:.. (813) 831 -8140 The information contained in this transmission may be attorney /client privileged and, therefore,.confidential.. This information is intended only for the use of the individual or entity named in the body of the email. .If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hrereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, printing or copy of the communication is.strictly prohibited. If you received this transmission in error, or if you are not the individual or entity named, the receipt of this transmission is not intended to and does not waive any privilege, attorney /client or otherwise. If.you have. received this communication in error, please notify us by telephone or email. Thank you. ----- Original.Message ----- From: Wayne. Wells @myClearwater.com [ mailto :Wayne..Wells @myClearwater.com] Sent: Sunday, March 04, 2007 5:58 PM To: shasteen @tampabay.rr.com Subject: RE: 1573 S. Ft. Harrison Avenue Lisa - I am not aware of any political reason for such.. Parking on unapproved surfaces is not allowed by Code. A case against the next door neighbor was on the Code. Enforcement Board agenda last week. They gave him 90 days to find a solution to his.parking problem or abate the.unapproved parking on his property. Wayne ----- Original.Message ----- From: M. Lisa Shasteen [mailto :shasteen @tampabay.rr.com] Sent: Sunday,.March 04, 2007 5:53 PM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: RE: 1573.5. Ft. Harrison Avenue OK. I really appreciate your letting me know. Why is this such a red hot issue? I heard a rumor it was "political. ". It does seem to be something that someone has taken great interest in.. ; +) M. Lisa Shasteen, Esq. Lic. Real Estate.Broker THE SHASTEEN - SIZEMORE CO. 1 "The. Choice of Smarter ClienO My business. is. 100% by referral.. property - .of.any size -.I would can help them! Phone: (813) 220 -3000 Toll. Free:. (888) 880 -8558 Fax:_ (813) 283 -0677 Direct Fax: (813) 831 -8140 0 If you know of anyone ready to buy or sell appreciate. your. telling them about me so. I The information contained in this.transmission may be attorney /client privileged and, therefore, confidential.. This information is. intended only for the use of the individual or entity named in the.body of the. email. If the. reader of. this. message is not the intended recipient, you are hrereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, printing or copy of.the communication is strictly prohibited. If you received this transmission in error, or if you are not the individual or entity named, the receipt of. this transmission is not intended to and does. not. waive any privilege, attorney /client or otherwise.. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us by telephone or email. Thank you. - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Wayne. Wells @myClearwater.com [ mailto :Wayne.Wells @myClearwater.com] Sent: Sunday,.March 04, 2007 5:05 PM To: shasteen @tampabay.rr.com Subject: 1573 S. Ft. Harrison Avenue Lisa - I have been made aware.that apparently some parking on the above referenced property has occurred after the property has been posted, irrespective of the signs stating "no parking - towing ". Potentially, you might. need to. go to the next level of installing some type of barricades or barriers across the front of.the property to prevent unauthorized access onto the property, such as a fence (permit required), bollards and chains, or other appropriate barriers. Wayne Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Sunday, February 25, 2007 6:09 PM To: Delk, Michael Subject: Peppermill Information 'T11'. iFTa! Section 3- 14O3.A requires all parking lots, spaces, vehicular accessways and driveways to be improved with a permanent all- weather paving material, except as provided in Section 3- 1403.6 (which does not permit grass or other unpaved area for parking, displaying or storing motor vehicles, except for places of worship, outdoor recreational facilities or other uses the Planning Director approves). Gravel has not been allowed for any commercial uses during the time I have worked for the City. Neil brought the Peppermill site to the Development Review staff meeting at least a month ago, to determine whether the southern portion of the property could be developed for more parking. This triangular portion of the property, with diminishing dimensions, was determined to be unable to add any additional parking to that which exists today. Al Ruud has done a lot of research into this property. Variances granted in the past spoke to the tightness of parking. I believe a patio was added for smokers, but was not to be used for the serving of meals. I am unaware of whether seating has been added to this patio, which could be 'a part of the reason for the parking problem. The Peppermill restaurant employees and customers have used an unpaved area of the property to the north (1573 S. Ft. Harrison) for unapproved parking. I have had email discussions with the attorney for the property owner of 1573 S. Ft. Harrison, and they have had to post the property "no parking - towing" to avoid code enforcement citations due to the Peppermill situation (Al Ruud was going to cite that property owner). If you need any assistance, let me know. Wayne - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Kronschnabl, Jeff Sent: Thursday, February 22, 2007 1:55 PM To: Hall, Bob; Horne, William; Brumback, Garry Cc: Ruud, Alan K; Colon, Carlos; Delk, Michael; Thompson, Neil; Wells, Wayne Subject: RE: Peppermill Information Spoke with Mr. Maroni this morning and explained our findings. Bottom line is that the property is physically unable to handle the renewed customer base /parking. This was the same problem previous owners experienced years ago when the business was doing well. As we see it there are two possible solutions, one would be to acquire some property to the North of the restaurant site - but according to planning dept. staff, that may not be cost feasible for Mr. Maroni as the asking price is too high. The second solution is to find off site parking for his employees - perhaps the furniture store lot just South of the restaurant. He was appreciative of the telephone call and is making arrangements with the furniture store. He will also be calling Mr. Delk on a gravel parking lot question. Nothing more to report at this time - thanks Jeff - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Hall, Bob Sent: Wednesday, February 21, 2007 2:42 PM To: Horne, William; Brumback, Garry Cc: Kronschnabl, Jeff; Ruud, Alan K; Colon, Carlos Subject: Peppermill Information Attached are the notes for the Peppermill Case scheduled for the Code Enforcement Board for parking on the grass. There are also concerns regarding the parking in the right of way in which parking tickets are being issued by the Police Department. 0 The first case started in June of 2006 and was closed out. Then in November 2006, the current case was initiated. He was referred to Planning and Traffic Engineering for parking needs to be addressed. Nothing has been initiated by him to address the violation and thus the case is scheduled for the Code Enforcement Board next week. << File: peppermill case.pdf >> Also, minutes in ISYS indicate he was made aware of the parking concerns when he applied for approval of the deck. The minutes were from 12- 14 -00. Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Thursday, February 15, 2007 6:57 PM To: Ruud, Alan K Subject: FW: TMP2007- 02015, 1573 S. Ft. Harrison Avenue FYI - Forgot to copy you on this. - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Thursday, February 15, 2007.6:56 PM To: Thompson, Neil Cc: Kurleman, Scott Subject: TMP2007- 02015, 1573 S. Ft. Harrison Avenue Neil - I have had ongoing discussions with Al Ruud regarding unpermitted parking on unapproved surfaces on this property, caused by the adjacent business (Pepper Mill Restaurant), and with the attorney for the property owner. I would like to see the permission given by the property owner of the above property to grant the special event parking on this property, since the property was just a few days ago was posted "no parking - vehicles will be towed" by the property owner. Wayne • Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Thursday, February 15, 2007 6:56 PM To: Thompson, Neil Cc: Kurleman, Scott Subject: TMP2007- 02015, 1573 S. Ft. Harrison Avenue Neil - 0 I have had ongoing discussions with Al Ruud regarding unpermitted parking on unapproved surfaces on this property, caused by the adjacent business (Pepper Mill Restaurant), and with the attorney for the property owner. I would like to see the permission given by the property owner of the above property to grant the special event parking on this property, since the property was just a few days ago was posted "no parking - vehicles will be towed" by the property owner. Wayne • Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Friday, February 09, 2007 11:27 AM To: Ruud, Alan K Subject: 1573 S. Ft. Harrison Avenue Al - 0 FYI - I received the following reply yesterday from the attorney for the property owner of 1573 S. Ft. Harrison Avenue: "We have posted signs as of today. I'll pass your suggestions on to Ange. In the meantime, the property has been cleared of all brush and mowed. I also spoke at length with Mark Marone of the Peppermill. He's a nice guy and has little control what his clients do, but I told him as of tomorrow, noon, we are going to start towing anything and everything that shows up there, so I hope the code guys don't leave a vehicle on site! (just kidding) Haha. Maybe that will get their attention. As an aside, we were in the midst of a discussion to allow folks from the restaurant to park there, provided the restaurant owner kept up the property, etc., when this all arose. I told Mark to investigate the proper permitting procedure, which I believe he is trying to do. Thank you for helping me on this." M. Lisa Shasteen, Esq. Lic. Real Estate Broker THE SHASTEEN- SIZEMORE CO. "The Choice of Smarter Clients" Phone: (813).220 -3000 Toll Free:. (888). 880 -8558 Fax: (813) 283 -0677 Direct Fax: (813) 831 -8140 '� r � • Page. 1 of 3 Wells, Wayne From: M. Lisa Shasteen [shasteen @tampabay.rr.com] Sent: Wednesday, February 07, 2007 9:26 PM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: RE: hl We have posted signs as of today. I'll pass your suggestions on to Ange. In the meantime, the property has been cleared of all brush and mowed. I also spoke at length with Mark Marone of the Peppermill. He's a nice guy . and has little control what his clients do, but I told him as of tomorrow, noon, we are going to start towing anything and everything that shows up there, so I hope the code guys don't leave a vehicle on site! (just kidding) Haha. Maybe that will get their attention. As an aside, we were in the midst of a discussion to allow folks from the restaurant to park there, provided the restaurant owner kept up the property, etc., when this all arose. I told Mark to investigate the proper permitting procedure, which I believe he is trying to do. Thank you for helping me on this. M. Lisa Shasteen, Esq. Lic. Real Estate Broker THE SHASTEEN- SIZEMORE CO. "The Clioice of Smarter Clients" Phone: (813) 220 -3000 Toll Free:. (888) 880 -8558 Fax: (813) 283 -0677 Direct Fax:. (813).831-8140 The information contained in this transmission may be attorney /client privileged and, therefore, confidential.. This information is intended only for the use of the individual or entity named in the body of the email. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hrereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, printing or copy of the communication is strictly prohibited. If you received this transmission in error, or if you are not the individual or entity named, the receipt of this transmission is not intended to and does not waive any privilege, attorney /client or otherwise. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us by telephone or email. Thank you. From: Wayne.Wells @myClearwater.com [ mailto :Wayne.Wells @myClearwater.com] Sent: Wednesday,. February 07, 2007 1:36 PM To: shasteen @tampabay.rr.com Subject: RE:. hI Al Ruud, the Code Enforcement officer for this area and whom has been dealing with the issues for this site and with Pepper Mill, suggested installing posts with chain between to restrict access at both driveways and post "no parking" and /or "no trespassing" signage. - - - -- Original Message - - - - -. From:. M. Lisa Shasteen [mailto :shasteen @tampabay.rr.com]. Sent: Wednesday, February 07, 2007.9:15 AM To:. Wells, Wayne Subject: RE:. N We actually learned of the parking that was going on only last week, when I insisted on going to the property to investigate it. Angelo and I both told the folks who parked there that they needed to move and that parking is not permitted. Further, Angelo posted towing signs. We also are speaking to Mark Marone of the Peppermill about the situation. We need to get on him, because he's taking advantage of the fact that we cannot occupy a vacant structure and be there to police his restauraunt operations 24/7. This pisses me off, excuse my French. We were considering doing an agreement with him for parking — 5/11/2008 Page 2 of 3 provided that he obtained all the proper permits and insured us, but this is not right. Thank you for letting me know.. I am so sorry to hear about your brother. I'm glad he made it through. You know, things like that put other things into perspective. Take the time to enjoy your family. It's all we have. As for you, Mr. Work himself! Sounds dizzying. I will call you to see if you're available for lunch. It would be great to catch up! Cheers for now (late for a meeting I'm chairing),. Lisa M. Lisa Shasteen, Esq. Lic. Real Estate. Broker THE SHASTEEN- SIZEMORE CO. "The Choice of Smarter Clients" Phone: (813) 220 -3000 Toll Free:. (888) 880 -8558. Fax: (813) 283 -0677 Direct Fax:. (813) 831 -8140 The information contained in this transmission may be attorney /client privileged and, therefore, confidential. This information is intended only for the use of the individual or entity named in the body of the email. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hrereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, printing or copy of the communication is strictly prohibited.. If you received this transmission in error, or if you are not the individual or entity named, the receipt of this transmission is not intended to and does not waive any privilege, attorney /client or otherwise. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us by telephone or email. Thank you. From: Wayne. Wells @myClearwater.com [ mailto :Wayne.Wells @myClearwater.com] Sent:. Wednesday, February 07, 2007 7:31 AM To: lisa @shasteen- sizemore.com Subject:. RE: hI Lisa -. Thanks for the heads up. I will see what I can do to help him. While we are talking about that property, Code Enforcement is sending notice of violations or it is being set up for the Code Enforcement Board for unpermitted grass parking. Seems as the adjacent restaurant to the south (Pepper Mill) is using 1573 as a parking lot. Violations are filed against the property owner, so you might want to advise Mr. Markopoulos (I think he is still the owner) that he needs to take care of this (put up a fence [with a permit] or barricades to prevent illegal parking on the property.. I am still very busy, working long hours. I am working on a change to the site plan and development agreement for the Hyatt to eliminate the pedestrian overpass bridge over S. Gulfview. There are many other projects, some controversial. Work... work.... work. I am heading up to GA this weekend. My younger brother had a heart attack (moderate) and am going to visit. My older brother is coming down from NC. Will visit for the weekend.. I hope you are doing well. You will need to tell me HOW you got to travel on the Navy ship. You must have made a hit on the ship - lots of guys on a ship for a long time - few women - a beautiful blonde comes onboard for a nine -day excursion. You were probably an extremely nice sight for the puppy dog eyes of those sailors. They didn't make you swab the deck, did they ?? Keep in touch. Remember... if you are over this way, give me a ring and maybe we could do lunch. Wayne 5/11/2008 Page. 3 of 3 - - - -- Original Message---- - From: M. Lisa Shasteen, Esq. [mailto:lisa @shasteen- sizemore.com]. Sent: Wednesday, February 07, 2007 12:07 AM To: Wells,. Wayne Subject: N Hey there, Stranger! I got a call from a broker today who is interested in that property at 1573 S. Ft. Harrison. He is going to call you re his proposed uses. I told him I couldn't advise him, but you could. I just thought I'd give you a head's up. His name is Jim Velazquez. He seems like a nice man. WHAT ARE YOU UP TO ?? M.. Lisa Shasteen, Esq. Lic. Real Estate Broker THE SHASTEEN - SIZEMORE CO. "The Choice of Smarter Clients" Phone: (813) 220 -3000 Toll Free:. (888) 880 -8558 Fax: (813) 283 -0677 Direct Fax: (813) 831 -8140. The information contained in this transmission may be attomey /client privileged and, therefore, confidential. This information is intended only for the use of the individual or entity named in the body of the email. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hrereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, printing or copy of the communication is strictly prohibited. If you received this transmission in error, or if you are not the individual or entity named, the receipt of this transmission is not intended to and does not waive any privilege, attomey/cli'ent gr otherwise.. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us by telephone or email. Thank you. 5/11/2008 Wells, Wayne From: Steve Lafferty [steve @laffertyarch.com] Sent: Tuesday, December 26, 2006 1:06 PM To: Wells, Wayne Cc: Ruud, Alan K; Tom Mudano Subject: RE: 1573. S. Ft. Harrison Avenue Thank you very much for alerting us to this issue. Our client, Innovative Research, has decided not to purchase the property at this time, so it looks like this will fall back on the current owners of the property. Thanks again, and I hope you had a wonderful Christmas celebration and that you do have a safe and enjoyable New Year's celebration. -Steve Lafferty steve @LaffertyARCH.com ...Creating Spaces that Facilitate Impacts upon Peoples' Lives... - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Wayne. Wells @myClearwater.com ( mailto :Wayne.Wells @myClearwater.com) Sent: Tuesday, December 26, 2006 8:03 AM To: Steve Lafferty Cc: Alan.Ruud @myClearwater.com Subject: 1573 S. Ft. Harrison Avenue Steve You came in on December 6, 2006, to the BPRC meeting to discuss a potential doctor's office at the above referenced address. I don' t know where you and your client are in the process, whether your client has purchased the property or not, but I wanted to bring to your attention as a courtesy that customers of the Peppermill Restaurant directly south have been parking on the subject property. Since there is no paved parking on the subject property, Code Enforcement is preparing to cite the property owner of 1573 S. Ft. Harrison Avenue for violation of parking on the grass (unpaved surfaces), as it is the property owner of the property where the violation exists that is cited. Should this be an issue for your client, you may want to take action to prevent illegal parking on the subject property. Should you have questions, you may call me (562 -4504) or Alan Ruud (Inspection Specialist in the Community Response Team, 562 - 4711). Wayne 1 ,�� 1 Page 1 of 4 Wells, Wayne From: M. Lisa Shasteen [shasteen @tampabay.rr.com] Sent: Wednesday, February 22, 2006 10:13 PM To: Coccia, Mike Cc: Legters, Neil; Wells, Wayne; Wilson, Kyle Subject: RE: 1573 S. Ft. Harrison Hey,. Mike — Thanks for your explanation. Can you fax or email me copies of the prior notices concerning the violations that are at issue? I need to make absolutely certain of what I'm speaking with my clients about, and the sooner I have those notices, the faster I can address these issues.. Also, where are the files on case SW02005- 03001. maintained? If I need to copy more than the 2 notices you mentioned below, I'll need to know where I can access them. Thanks much again, M. Lisa Shasteen, Esq. Phone: (813) 220 -3000 Fax: (813) 831 -8140 The information contained in this transmission may be attomey /client privileged and, therefore, confidential. This information is intended only for the use of the individual or entity named in the body of the email. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hrereby notified that any dissenmination, distribution, printing or copy of the communication is strictly prohibited. If you received this transmission in error, or if you are not the individual or entity named, the receipt of this transmission is not intended to and does not waive any privilege, attorney /client or otherwise. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us by telephone or email. Thank you. - - - -- Original. Message---- - From: mike.coccia @myclearwater.com [mailto:mike.coccia @myclearwater.com] Sent: Wednesday, February 22, 2006 10:50 AM To: shasteen @tampabay.rr.com Cc: Neil.Legters @myclearwater.com; Wayne.Wells @myclearwater.com;. Kyle.Wilson @myclearwater.com Subject:. RE: 1573 S. Ft. Harrison Lisa, I apologize for the late response. 1573 S.. Ft Harrison Ave was cited for work with out permits on March 1, 2005 - almost a year to the day. A contractor w/Magnum Homes submitted an incomplete application on April 4, 2005 The contractor was advised to meet with Planning/Zoning to, discuss department approvals before any permits could be issued. They were also advised to submit engineered drawings and site plans. A Notice of Violation was issued to. the property owner on June 20, 2005 for noncompliance. Notices (w /compliance date of June 30, 2005) were posted on site and 5/11/2008 • Page. 2 of 4 sent to. the property owner by regularr and certified mail. I received a faxed letter from your office on June 30, 2005 informing Development Services that your client was working with an architect/engineer and requested an extension. Your fax/letter also noted a proposal (outlining the scope of work) would be submitted ASAP. Development Services Department has not received any such documents to. date.. Given the duration of the outstanding violations, the department feels the property owner has had ample time to resolve outstanding building code issues by permitting or demolition, as your. letter /fax indicated. Therefore, we will be moving forward with enforcement. The case (SWO2005- 03001). will be submitted to the Municipal Code Enforcement Board on April 26. MCEB (approx. 63 -days) Thank you, Mike. Coccia Building Construction Inspector (727) 562 -4572 - - - -- Original Message---- - From: M. Lisa Shasteen [mailto:shasteen @tampabay.rr.com] Sent: Friday, February 17, 2006 8:29 PM To: Wilson, Kyle Cc: Coccia, Mike Subject: RE: 1573 S. Ft. Harrison Dear Mike My clients say that they have a letter from the city staying enforcement for violations that were created by the people who. owned the property previously, pending their renovation. Also, I know I wrote a letter confirming my conversation earlier re the same. Finally, the building is secure from entry, is not occupied, has not been occupied since my clients purchased it, will not be occupied unless and until it is brought into compliance with governing codes, and poses no threat to anyone. So, why must we rush to. tear down the building? As I told you on the phone, I expect to. be able to get you a reasonable date once we my clients have a plan from their architect, and that would take about 2 -3 weeks. You seemed to be fine with that on the phone. You had also indicated in our phone conversation that you were going to. email or fax me a description of the violations you're dealing with. I would appreciate getting that summary from you at your earliest convenience.. Also, I'd like to see copies of all of the notices you sent to. the prior owner during his period of ownership and the action you took against him, as well as all of the notices you've sent to my clients.. You can email me or fax. My fax number is below. If I have to visit your office to get a copy of these. items, I'm happy to do so. Just let me know your business street address, and I'll be there Tuesday or Wednesday, unless the City works on Presidents' Day. 5/11/2008 5/11/2008 0 • Page 3. of 4 Best regards, M.. Lisa Shasteen, Esq.. Phone:. (813).220-3000 Fax:. (813) 831 -8140 The information contained in this transmission may be attomey /client privileged and, therefore, confidential. This information is intended only for the use of the individual or entity named in the body of the email. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hrereby notified that any dissenmination, distribution, printing or copy of the communication is strictly prohibited. If you received this transmission in error, or if you are not the individual or entity named, t he receipt of this transmission is not intended to and does not waive any privilege, attomey /client or otherwise. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us by telephone or email. Thank you. - - - -- Original Message - - - - -. From: Kyle.Wilson @myClearwater.com [ mailto :Kyle.Wilson @myClearwater.com] Sent: Friday, February 17, 2006 4:11 PM To: shasteen @tampabay.rr.com Cc: mike.coccia @myClearwater.com Subject:. RE: 1573 S. Ft. Harrison Lisa - Mike believes 45 days from the time we receive the letter is a reasonable amount time to have the structure raised. If you have any questions, you can contact Mike or I at any time.. Thanks Kyle Wilson City of Clearwater. - - - -- Original Message--- - From: M. Lisa Shasteen [mailto :shasteen @tampabay.rr.com] Sent: Thursday,. February 16, 2006 11:24 PM To: Coccia, Mike; Wilson, Kyle Subject: 1573 S. Ft. Harrison Mike — Thank you for our conversation early this morning.. You had indicated to me that there were certain issues outstanding concerning the property. I shared that my clients' current intent is to remove the existing building and redevelop the site. In that connection, I understand you will be getting to me an email stating exactly what you need by way of a letter from the owners of the referenced parcel to describe their development plans so that you have some idea of when the building will be removed. Obviously, it doesn't make a lot of sense to pursue a case that will soon become moot..: =) . We have hired an architect and engineer and are moving forward. Anyway, I know you need some time frames in the owners' letter, but I want to make sure it is complete. I am waiting for your email so that I can comply with your request. Thanks for your assistance on this one, M. Lisa Shasteen, Esq. Phone: (813).220 -3000 Page 4 of 4 is 0 Fax: (813).831 -8140 The information contained in this transmission may be attorney /client privileged and, therefore, confidential. This information is intended only for the use of the individual or entity named in the body of the email. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hrereby notified that any dissenmination, distribution, printing or copy of the communication is strictly prohibited. If you received this transmission in error, or if you are not the individual or entity named, t he receipt of this transmission is not intended to and does not waive any privilege, attomey /client or otherwise. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us by telephone or email. Thank you. 5/11/2008 FLD 08- 03007; 41 BELLEAIR POIN''" ,iV0S;TMENTS LLC ROWN, ELLEN L tN L RETIREMENT_ CORP. 101 CORONADO DR 630 BRYANT ST 420 S ORANGE AVE ' 6 CORP FL 33767 - 2429 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 2148 ORLANDO FL 32801 - 3399 CLEAR TRAILS MGMT INC CLEARWATER NEIGHBORHOODS 1650 CLEARWATER LARGO RD COALITION PRESIDENT SHELLEY COMMUNITY SERVICE FUND INC CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 1196 KUROGHLIAN 925 LAKEVIEW RD 1821 SPRINGWOOD CIRCLE S CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3420 CLEARWATER, FL 33763 DONNELL, MICHAEL T FAIRWINDS PROPERTIES INC FORD LIVING TRUST DONNELL, SHIRLEY 1569 S FT HARRISON AVE 1932 JEFFORDS ST 10454 SILHAVY DR CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 2004 CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 4732 LARGO FL 33774 - 5223 FORREST, DIANA R GAY PRODUCTS INC GIANFILIPPO, PETER 637 BRYANT ST 505 HOWARD CT STE 100 1594 S FORT HARRISON AVE CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 2147 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 1194 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 2074 GIANFILIPPO, PETER GLOSUP, EDGAR DEAN III GRAY, JAMES G GIANFILIPPO, FRANCES 28249 RODGERS DR 1516 CARMEL AVE 2167 BEECHER RD SANTA CLARITA CA 91350 - 3810 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 2150 CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 2224 HUTCHINS, FERN G JOHNSON, RICHARD S KHALSA, DEVA KAUR 1537 CARMEL AVE JOHNSON, JILL C NIGHSWONGER, MONTE D CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 2149 635 BELLEAIR RD 1560 S MYRTLE AVE CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 2106 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 2152 KIMBERLY HOME INC MACIEJEWSKI, SUSAN J MUIRHEAD, JOSEPH G 1189 NE CLEVELAND ST 1546 CARMEL AVE 1520 SADLON AVE CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 4815 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 2150 BELLEAIR FL 33756 - 2154 NELSON, DAVID L NELSON, JAN H II NELSON, VIVIAN G 1544 CARMEL AVE 1522 SADLON AVE 633 BRYANT ST CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 2150 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 2154 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 2147 HARBOR OAKS NEIGHBORHOOD HAYNES, SHERYL M HAMMOND, MARK A ASSOCIATION PRESIDENT BOB SHAUGHNESSY, PATRICK 1540 S MYRTLE AVE FRITZ 46 N PINE CIR CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 2152 320 MAGNOLIA DRIVE BELLEAIR FL 33756 - 1640 CLEARWATER, FL 33756 HOOPER, DAVID T HUNTER, DANIEL HUTCHESON, DAVID D HOOPER, FRANCES C 1524 CARMEL AVE HUTCHESON, WILLIAM C JR 1519 CARMEL AVE CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 2150 252 PINE RD CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 2149 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 1017 HUTCHINS, FERN G JOHNSON, RICHARD S KHALSA, DEVA KAUR 1537 CARMEL AVE JOHNSON, JILL C NIGHSWONGER, MONTE D CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 2149 635 BELLEAIR RD 1560 S MYRTLE AVE CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 2106 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 2152 KIMBERLY HOME INC MACIEJEWSKI, SUSAN J MUIRHEAD, JOSEPH G 1189 NE CLEVELAND ST 1546 CARMEL AVE 1520 SADLON AVE CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 4815 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 2150 BELLEAIR FL 33756 - 2154 NELSON, DAVID L NELSON, JAN H II NELSON, VIVIAN G 1544 CARMEL AVE 1522 SADLON AVE 633 BRYANT ST CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 2150 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 2154 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 2147 PMLHCINC 6060 LEELAND ST S ST PETERSBURG FL 33715 - 1638 SHAUGHNESSY, PATRICK J HAYNES, SHERYL M PO BOX 1773 LARGO FL 33779 - 1773 WILLIAMS, JOSEPHINE 1538 CARMEL AVE CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 2150 REDZOVIC, MUSTO REDZOVIC, ZEUHRA 2202 DURANT CT VALRICO FL 33594 - 5301 TORRES, DAMARIS SANCHEZ TORRES, ESTEBAN 1541 CARMEL AVE CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 2149 ZENJOY PROPERTIES LLC PO BOX 837 LARGO FL 33779 - 0837 RELIGIOUS COMNTY SVC INC 503 S M L KING JR AVE CLEARWATER FL 33756 - WILKIE, CHRISTIAN 634 BRYANT ST CLEARWATER FL 33756 - CITY OF CLEARWATER NOTICE OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD PUBLIC HEARINGS The Community Development Board of the City of Clearwater, Florida, will hold public hearings on .Tuesday, May 20, 2008, beginning at 1:00 p.m., in the City Council Chambers, in City Hall, -3rd floor, 112 South Osceola Ave, Clearwater, Florida, to consider the following requests: NOTE: All persons wishing to address an item need to be present at the BEGINNING of the meeting. Those cases that are not contested by the applicant, staff, neighboring property owners, etc. will be placed on a consent agenda and approved by a single vote at the beginning -of the meeting. 1. John Atanasio is appealing an administrative interpretation of the Community Development Code (Code) and appeal of a decision of an administrative official stating that it is necessary to reapply fof approval for an Automobile Service Station use at the site through the Flexible Development process as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project. The prior Automobile Service Station use of the site was discontinued in excess of six consecutive months requiring resumption of the use conform to all Code requirements (Code Sec. 6- 103.D.) and the site not meeting development standards and landscape criteria set forth in Code Sec. 2 -703 and Sec. 3- 1201. (Proposed Use: Automobile Service Station) at 1996 Gulf -to -Bay Blvd., Sec.13- 29 -15, M & B 24 -08. Assigned Planner: Neil Thompson, AICP, Development Review Manager. APP2008 -00003 2. Church of Scientology Flag Service Organization, Inc. are requesting Flexible Development approval for an existing 50 -room hotel in the Downtown (D) District with a reduction to the minimum off - street parking requirement from 50 spaces to 24 spaces as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, pursuant to Community Development Code Sec. 2- 903.C. (Proposed Use: Overnight Accommodations) at 711 Cleveland St., Gould & Ewing's 2nd Add Blk 12, Lot 3 & E 31 ft of Lot 4 & all of Lots 7 & 8. Assigned Planner: Robert G. Tefft, Planner III. FLD2008 -03008 3. 1573, LLC., (Wayne Siefried) is requesting Flexible Development approval to permit offices and medical clinics in the Commercial (C) District with reductions to the front (west) setback from 25 ft to 13.6 ft (to existing building), 16.3 (to proposed building) and 15 ft (to proposed pavement), a reduction to the side (south) setback from 10 ft to 5 ft (to existing building), a reduction to the rear (east) setback from 20 ft to 10 ft (to proposed pavement) and an increase to building ht from 25 ft to 26.33 ft for an entry parapet, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Sec. 2- 704.C; and a reduction to the perimeter buffer along S. Ft. Harrison Ave. from 15 ft to 13.6 ft (to existing building), as a Comprehensive Landscape Program, under the provisions of Sec. 3- 1202.G.. (Proposed Use: Offices & Medical Clinics) at 1573 S. Ft. Harrison Ave., Sec. 21- 29 -15, M & B 44 -20. Assigned Planner: Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Planner III. FLD2008 -03007 4. Everybody's Taberbacle, Inc. are requesting Flexible Development approval to permit the expansion of a "social/public service agency" in the Institutional (1) District by the construction of a new, two -story, 10,015 sq ft building for the Homeless Emergency Project (HEP) in conjunction with other existing uses (place of worship, residential shelter and accessory dwelling) with reductions to the front (west) setback from Fairburn Ave. from 25 ft to 10.18 ft (to proposed building), 8.3 ft (to existing building) and 20.5 ft (to proposed pavement), a reduction to the front (north) setback from Otis C. Green Dr. from 25 ft to 8.25 ft (to existing pavement), a reduction to the front (east) setback from N. Betty Ln. from 25 ft to 20.3 ft (to existing building) and a reduction 4" N 6 0 to required parking from 122 to 43 spaces, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Sec. 2- 1204.A, and a reduction to the landscape buffer along Otis C. Green Dr. from 10 to 8.25 ft (to existing pavement), as a Comprehensive Landscape Program, under the provisions of Sec. 3- 1202.G. (Proposed Use: Expansion of a "social/public service agency" in conjunction with other existing uses [place of worship, residential shelter & accessory dwelling]) at 1.120 Betty Ln. N., Fair Burn Add Blk F, Lot 11. Assigned Planner: Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Planner III. FLD2008 -03006 Interested parties may appear and be heard at the hearing or . file written notice of approval or objection with the Planning Director or City Clerk prior to the hearing. Any person who decides to appeal any decision made by the Board or Council, with respect to any matter considered at such hearings, will need to request a record of the proceedings and, for such purpose, may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based per Florida Statute 286.0105. Community Development Code Sec 4 -206 states that party status shall be granted by the Board in quasi-judicial cases if the person requesting such status demonstrates that s/he is substantially affected. Party status entitles parties to personally testify, present evidence, argument and witnesses, cross - examine witnesses, appeal the decision and speak on reconsideration requests, and needs to be requested and obtained during the case discussion before the CDB. An oath will be administered swearing in all persons giving testimony in quasi-judicial public hearing cases. If you wish to speak at the meeting, please wait to be recognized, then state and spell your name and provide your address. Persons without party status speaking before the CDB shall be limited to three minutes unless an individual is representing a group in which case the Chairperson may authorize a reasonable amount of time up to 10 minutes. Five days prior to the meeting, staff reports and recommendations on the above requests will be available for review by interested parties between the hours of 8:30 a.m. and 4:30 p.m., weekdays, at the City of Clearwater, Planning Department, 100 S. Myrtle Ave., Clearwater, FL 33756. Please contact the case presenter, at 562 -4567 to discuss any questions or concerns about the project and/or to better understand the proposal and review the site plan. Michael Delk Cynthia E. Goudeau, MMC Planning Director City Clerk City of Clearwater P.O. Box 4748, Clearwater, FL 33758 -4748 NOTE: Applicant or representative must be present at the hearing. A COPY OF THIS AD IN LARGE PRINT IS AVAILABLE IN OFFICIAL RECORDS AND LEGISLATIVE SERVICES. ANY PERSON WITH A DISABILITY REQUIRING REASONABLE ACCOMMODATION IN ORDER TO PARTICIPATE IN THIS MEETING SHOULD CALL (727) 562 -4093 WITH THEIR REQUEST. To learn more about presenting to Clearwater boards and City Council, go to http:// clearwater .granicus.comNiewPubIisher.php ?view id =11 and click on "Resident Engagement Video." You can also check the informational video out from any Clearwater public library. Ad: 05/08/08 Ill i C ITY OF C LEARWATER POST OFFICE Box 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758 -4748 MUNICIPAL. SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 f� TELEPHONE (727) 562 -4567 FAx (727) 562 -4865 t i i,F�f PLANNING DEPARTMENT May 21, 2008 Trevor Howard Howard Civil Engineering, LLC 1601 3rd Street South St. Petersburg, FL 33701 RE: Development Order - Case FLD2008 -03007 1573 S. Ft. Harrison Avenue Dear Mr. Howard: This letter constitutes a Development Order pursuant to Section 4- 206.D.6 of the Community Development Code. On May 20, 2008, the Community Development Board reviewed your request for Flexible Development approval to permit offices and medical clinics in the Commercial (C) District with reductions to the front (west) setback from 25 feet to 13.6 feet (to existing building), 16.3 (to proposed building) and 15 feet (to proposed pavement), a reduction to the side (south) setback from 10 feet to five feet (to existing building), a reduction to the rear (east) setback from 20 feet to 10 feet (to proposed pavement) and an increase to building height from 25 feet to 26.33 feet for an entry parapet, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2- 704.C; and a reduction to the perimeter buffer along S. Ft. Harrison Avenue from 15 feet to 13.6 feet (to existing building), as a Comprehensive Landscape Program, under the provisions of Section 3- 1202.G. The Community Development Board (CDB) APPROVED the application with the following Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and Conditions of Approval: Findings of Fact: 1. The 0.96 acres is located on the east side of S. Ft. Harrison Avenue, approximately 500 feet north of Belleair Rd; 2. The property is currently developed with a two -story warehouse type building that has been vacant for a number of years, with no paved parking on the premises; 3. There have been two times in the past where improvements have been made to the property without the benefit of building permits, with those improvements later removed. When unapproved improvements were made to the property in 2004 it was calculated that 37- inches of trees were also illegally removed; 4. The proposal is to redevelop the site to permit offices and medical clinics; 5. The existing/proposed building will be a total of 10,853 square feet in floor area (5,570 square feet first floor; 5;283 square feet second floor), with stair and elevator additions to be constructed on the west and north sides of the existing building; "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER" KI May 21, 2008 Howard — Page 2 6. A total of 44 parking spaces will be constructed, meeting the Code required number of parking spaces for offices (the higher requirement of offices and medical clinics), as well as a required loading space; 7. The existing southern driveway will be reconfigured and moved northward, while the existing northern driveway will be removed as part of the site improvements, decreasing turning movements at this location where northbound lanes are merging thereby increasing safer future conditions; 8. The proposal includes reductions to the front (west) setback from 25 feet to 13.6 feet (to existing building), 16.3 (to proposed building) and 15 feet (to proposed pavement), a reduction to the side (south) setback from 10 feet to five feet (to existing building) and a reduction to the rear (east) setback from 20 feet to 10 feet (to proposed pavement); 9. The proposal is to retain the existing building, adding only a required egress stairwell on the west and north sides of the building and an elevator on the north side of the building; 10. The reductions to required setbacks can be viewed as necessary to provide a relevant site and building design, given the context of the site and contiguous uses; 11. The proposal includes an increase to building height from 25 feet to 26.33 feet for an entry parapet. The increased height of the parapet is only at the entry area on the northern side of the building. The existing building otherwise meets Code height requirements; 12. The proposal includes a reduction to the perimeter landscape buffer along South Ft. Harrison Avenue from 15 feet to 13.6 feet (to existing building). The planting of the entire area between the west wall of the existing/proposed building and the front property line offsets the encroachment of this small triangular area of the building into the front landscape buffer; 13. The number and size of trees to be planted complies with the tree replacement requirements due to the previous removal of trees in 2004; and 14. There are no outstanding Code Enforcement issues associated with the subject property. Conclusions of Law: 1. That the development proposal is consistent with the Standards as per Tables 2- 701.1, 2 -703 and 2- 704 of the Community Development Code; 2. That the development proposal is consistent with the Flexibility criteria as per Section 2 -704.0 of the Community Development Code; 3. That the development proposal is consistent with the General Standards for Level Two Approvals as per Section 3 -913 of the Community Development Code; and 4. The proposal is compatible with the adjacent land uses. Conditions of Approval: 1. That the final design and color of the offices and medical clinic building be consistent with the conceptual elevations submitted to, or as modified by, the CDB; 2. That any future freestanding sign be a monument -style sign and be designed to match the exterior materials and color of the building. The maximum height shall be six feet, unless a higher sign is approved through a Comprehensive Sign Program; 3. That, prior to the issuance of any permits, the landscape plans be amended to ensure plant counts are correct; 4. That, prior to the issuance of any permits, plans show the location of proposed outdoor mechanical equipment and the required screening in accordance with Section 3- 201.D; 5. That, prior to the issuance of any permits, a Tree Preservation Plan prepared by a certified arborist, consulting arborist, landscape architect or other specialist in the field of arboriculture be submitted; May 21, 2008 Howard — Page 3 6. That, prior to the issuance.of any permits, a maintenance easement be recorded in the public records for the ditch along the north property line; 7. That, prior to the issuance of any permits, compliance with all requirements of General Engineering, Traffic Engineering and Stormwater Engineering be met; and 8. That, prior to the issuance of the building permit, the building and accent colors be amended to conform to the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan Design Guidelines. Pursuant to Section 4 -407, an application for a building permit or other approvals shall be made within one year of Flexible Development approval (by May 20, 2009). All required certificates of occupancy shall be obtained within two years of the. date of issuance of the initial building permit. The building permit must be obtained within six months of the initial permit application This timeframe to obtain the initial building permit may be extended for an additional six .months for cause by the Community Development Coordinator. Time frames do not change with successive owners. The Community Development Coordinator may grant an extension of time for the Flexible Development approval for a period not to exceed one year and only within the original period of validity. The issuance of this Development Order does not relieve you of the necessity to obtain any building permits or pay any impact fees that may be required. In order to facilitate the issuance of any permit or license affected by this approval, please bring a copy of this letter with you when applying for any permits or licenses that require this prior development approval. Additionally, an appeal of a Level Two approval (Flexible Development) may be initiated pursuant to Section 4 -502.13 by the applicant or by any person granted party status within 14 days of the date of the CDB meeting. The filing of an application/notice of appeal shall stay the effect of the decision pending the final determination of the case. The appeal period for your case expires on June 3, 2008 (14 days from the date of the CDB meeting). If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call Wayne M. Wells, Planner III, at 727 -562 -4504. You can access zoning information for parcels within the City through our website: www.mycleanvater.com/gov/depts/planning. Sincere, Mich %a�el De k, AIC Planning Director S: IPlanning Departmentl CD BIFLEX (FLD)Ilnactive or Finished ApplicationslFt. Harrison S1573 Offices (C) -Approved - WWIFt. Harrison S 1573 Development Order 5.21.08.doc t`- W i ;r SHEET I DE 1 C -1 COVER SHEET C -2 GENERAL NOTES AND SPECIFICATIONS C -3 SITE PLAN C -4 PAVING ,GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN C -5 UTILITY PLAN C -6 LANDSCAPE PLAN C -7 DETAIL SHEET C -8 DETAIL SHEET C -9 DETAIL SHEET C -10 DETAIL SHEET S SURVEY PROD FE�SIOO AL TEA S CIVIL ENGINEER Howard Civil Engineering, LLC 1601 3rd Street S. - Suite A St. Petersburg, FL. 33701 Offfice (727) 490 -1784 Fax (727) 490 -1787 ARCHITECT Fraze Design 9 Contact: Frank Fraze 1 AIA 1750 Central Avenue St. Petersburg, FL. 33712 - O ffice 727 - 328-3608 Fax ( 727) - 328 -3609 3 WORKING DAYS BEFORE YOU DIG CALL SUNSHINE STATE ONE CALL OF FLORIDA 1- 800- 432 -4770 FOR THE LOCATION OF UNDERGROUND FACILITIES THE LOCATIONS OF EXISTING UNDERGROUND UTILITIES ARE SHOWN IN AN APPROXIMATE WAY ONLY AND HAVE NOT BEEN INDEPENDENTLY VERIFIED BY THE OWNER OR ITS REPRESENTATIVE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL DETERMINE THE EXACT LOCATION OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES BEFORE COMMENCING WORK, AND AGREES TO BE FULLY RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY AND ALL DAMAGES WHICH MIGHT BE OCCASIONED BY THE CONTRACTOR'S FAILURE TO EXACTLY LOCATE AND PRESERVE ANY AND ALL UNDERGROUND UTILITIES. SURVEYOR COO PREHE SI I FILL R DDE ELOOF E T IT] John Brendla & Associates, Inc. 8015 82nd Avenue North Pinellas Park, FL. 33781 Office (727) 576 -7546 Fax (727) 577 -9932 1 s 73 •� o A . F in C va Qt Vr9 F lo is a 7 U0 SECTION 21, TOWNSHIP 29 SOUTH, RANGE 15 EAST _ t - i Flaldkfot St L4a.t -Gault St �T4 feba st San Juan ct a - : _ ,Y_ -',' q_� Giiestnvl$l '7t30 •�__'._. _- C.,t3'• _ - ;, • " - o _� -a ��_- _ y [_- Cautt St ,Couit St 651 u r .. ,hri (',�t'� ,'ris :`N�' ".�';.�;��' �� m m E ('ri ,Q, � •d. mt7tsSart 51 Pi E°s } ±' •St,: ��'(r'' �''' +:v" d' q a =ilntrar $1 m Tvmwst - `; 9 a a 4 N. _;:•, f. ,ti >�' ¢ O jam' PWA 53 y PC* St Pine St FS mi l �` v b a T �( ,_ ,�:`'�,'1. ;, '� I ( Pwi 5l N rA Pim St V' +n ➢ to Dd Rd V! DNid Rd E P N Di i4 Rd E Jarrdne Way I .Jasmine Play VYSfY CJ�' ( - +*na Way �` 1' Yrc Y.Yy rn�nnofiao. mawcaaDr -4�•' '•z ', ;L''' - '` Win Pm Law Pa a i la t yAnPod% � Lotus PNtf I { WAA Pant 1: jogo.I.St '• - t? krtorw ddkXds Sl �0}rDldB $t .loNwds St if Plant a Gaud Cvn7al SI ; 1.' Y Sf a -, St Many Rd H�sp3al ; a a ,Igr4r Pocks St Lkernta Sl a Ttrtda Rd 244M St vYat♦jrloRd 1� a N m zRd I• `'�•' __ _- .__ -, -_ __. e/abtYng 31. ... _. 06aa7Rd coleatt AvWMIde Or st � ur A SC m N Lakee`ievu Rd M St) 416 m < d `, m 4�.' m V,* -;ia St wunTwsy Part Dr Alt . Lakeverr • g+ >' Tf* rkm SI v Coo Rd t satsuma St @a*,ma st PX iij C4 EdCWdght w', m ° daagaSt V�h +[I -Palls •.,, KuW-ftf St �i LM" St tree sx PO4 ra Mean 9 - ru.Ve St Wtd r CK" S1 tia!s'.o Dlyd ohm St lfirtlan St fi ISN � d 1 ! tt� K Lorswn Sf � SITE 4 $tst v WoodlatmAve Wo xn St F l4ouAawn Si n 1 n » 8elleairCountryClub w' i S w NuseryRd PO Raw St 1z. �d 5..`y e = a a Yea < 9� RbyN RC m Elen C r'S,,f m S 1`Q 9p d o q Itirili' y i mEkd H"zrd St m Or w - -_ - -�-- - - • v - _ -, -,. _. _, -..._ [ y 144d Rd' EGf eev Rtl 4 14 _ r BGY' :HIV: r•r' - Sum !� m a 3 • �rmmons Tcarace NE ' n i , T • 1St 5t � ,3 OVIAVe 2nd S1 • o ..1 _ 24' 0aytra,v fk °> 9 Labe Ave ;•',,,'i Q� '� m m ! � d W.ASta SLakaA- M w a Be11Qah - e SaVtkddgs Dr �� PwwdeLval,Dlyd wja St 1 lvy+ttst PonmdaLeonbivd m 19 c ti s i y f o s CL t' a Swsmwd Dr y Dr N Location Map _.•a 1� �;I' ,.S / r..y.: ,,>�'', s�r "i,1 ,i -' , ` " ":" ,I.'F"- Mi; .-S, .:Ir •�,,• '(;_,, et. ., y;r ,t, ;;I_� 3x: „sk', , Z t �t ,v;" a t',= -ham'` •k "`'i' =t - 'y ty ' 'ty�k ':n �;l_; u \' d 'eN::r'� 't VP ri: - ,�1t ,��_ 1' g, f 1 s.' +'.Y Y- Y ,AS ' t R ^il „ ?„ ,4 - 'r7 -� ' d• E �Vt ' fi • , {, b}2 r i � r tb t H 4 "kP' _ Fig t •1 �_ Nh: n„ t' „i t• 4 - ,�f I " -j 'Ic4:. �. i' ,';A.'` - - - „'.ice � �',ri� +_;E - ;`�1(+. -S +isa _ ,/ '. •!',n ".' "r.i tl^ t - '`�'Y ' F - . � -! •`{',' 'fit. . IN 14 ka, ",r' A?,u+ � ' Hi-: -d: ' , tx:Y .' ";•:riG �''�, '_;i - •ti r- _ _'/ a • `CI'' i�5.• ',.d:', .._di' .v.a.- -' -i' is `;.. .£"rY.l.,:. _ ,= '•s' {. -., - r x:i ' ,d : ,, .r ` d . %:i' -. .�. g^x%v_+.r -e•.,: � 1f• P1$+ec� .,` �:i,. } , s'y �h.; , .. ;'0. "n'd`i' _ vp, •h*. :S ' ,T,• �'xl.:w - i.'� `t5. S4. �'r >' *'r .. ?,,.� c� ,;a,r�"' t' - - •9,`•I. n a- ,N 5:g ,.{ -ux •`ri'`�'}`t �`:;=''1'�;,A `[,` .T'. f?t. "�M:s // �,3r, `,p ._�.r�, -.• e ,S�v.. �h _ i 1 I � rv, 4 r d!J s i 4 <�tl. ,. .. Lk. u p� :t. > � j:. ,':t, wry •Y � - •s - ,A ,�,,cc 'y • •. #:-.1 "'j. g. `en °%',a'i'r ,:F'ii "1,t - ��$. `d s�i', .'�-»,g•�.i:i" V" ' ' ' _ - '{,'VL• - ' d 't'r-$,_ _ .r i'.P.; Uti t i'4' l ,1 ti `'� _ n•cy e r• %' u 1 .�J Lt, • gq F' 5 �j1j '9 :i , ~I 4't : :. rf U n ; r•5, r° - t f•°2 ' } Yta - r.,,.,, S - .�� tr' rtz�n„ H S;" •$,.r - mss• _ _- 3 • r5; .Ei �'�� S�; t.e a ;V h :a r _k� r u`r n,Y 4 - .q> r} %n F f.4 ' e,. Y r 5 a, i t ,� �.L -4 y . -I . _ tom. w } „f -A ,S '", 1 }, in,,Vi'° �I•� �� i ' t4 ' r i "`i'" _ - � �`F „d f !ni• y - .Y. f"' vL i A } 'Lr✓ :w � h y, =t' f ',.ye -',may- }4K^' i� i?%� `1, •' t.n i F.'V - t I `'s•6�!rf �, �: Wit, 1''!' 1 A rt k, rY - - s - a�, � r. Wµ i, _t I F �r G}' y ;I. y, r�'•r t�F't s'�tv . i^ kr: T r z , . !9 'L � tt,�, , A� VE'• Y-5 . 4 { 4., "5 Y c W ,r� i • .. n. .� �. i 1 r�r„ a, ':1v - t ;'i{`u• V,:; - f i - w 1 :gFi y P'N : a iP k : om M." - i i, .x r i a " ` ; W. - w t=%•,, t, y 11 •t:• 3 -- t .• s- 4��'', t 7 S ^,� P'4 rl � -I - ��, r'I '+'i ": -• i'�, '+�:.. -?let :,yj� s; - -h X1 .t ...Z_•,Y,. tt,F',c Aerial Map Owner: 1573 L.L.C. 6985 1st Avenue North St. Petersburg, Florida 33710 (727) 347-3333 1 SITE PROPERTY INFO: PARCEL NUMBER: 21/29/15/00000/440 /2000 TOTAL PROJECT AREA: 0.96 ACRES (42,000 S.F.) ZONING: C - COMMERCIAL FUTURE LAND USE: CG - COMMERCIAL GENERAL EXISTING USE: WAREHOUSE (VACANT) PROPOSED RISE: PROFESSIONAL OFFICE AND MEDICAL CLINICS BUILDING HEIGHT: EXISTING: 25 FEET PROPOSED: 26.33 FEET FLOOD ZONE: FEMA PANEL 12103CO108H DATED MAY 11, 2005 ZONE X STRUCTURE SETBACKS: REQUIRED FRONT (FT HARRISON AVE) 25 FT. FRONT (FT HARRISON AVE) 25 FT. REAR ,,''SST) 20 FT. SIDE (NORTH) 20 FT. SIDE (SOUTH) 10 FT. SIDE (SOUTH) 10 FT. PROPOSED BUILDING: 10,853 SQUARE FEET TOTAL (2 STORY) 1St r-LOOR = 5,570 S.F. 2nd FLOOR = 5,283 S.F. FLOOR AREA RATIO: 13.6 FT. 15 FT. 10 FT. 20.67 FT. 5 FT. 10 FT. (EXIST. BUILDING) (PROP. PAVEMENT) (PROP. PAVEMENT) (PROP. PAVEMENT) (EXIST. BUILDING) (PROP. PAVEMENT) ALLOWED: 0.55 W b 2 N � . - � .x i 4' ru E , C 7 t,� a�, �� 'a n W PROPOSED: 0.26 _ n T 42,000 SF 0.96 AC. IMPERVIOUS U AREA RATIO: /) O I� ALLOWED: 0.95 LL Z CrS d .V PROPOSED: 0.54 W J T 1 PARKING: i LL 0 REQUIRED: J N C rn Q .r w = 4 SPACES PER 1,000 SF = 8 SPACES (10,853/1000 *4 =43.4) W PROPOSED: 44 SPACES N m -- INCLUDES 2 HANDICAP SPACES V! z IlY W Cr � W I- Q O U Zoning Approved EXISTING AREA BREAKDOWN: 3: 0 CITY OF CLEARWATER EXISTING AREA (S. F. % OF SITE L NNING DEP BY VEHICLE USE AREA 0 0.0% DATE--J5-12-1'1 D BUILDING 53795 13.8% S Q. D L OPEN GREEN SPACE 35 832 0 85.3% 0 �r r SIDEWALK/CONCRETE 373 0.9 0 Vi-,- o�S TOTAL COVERAGE 42,000 100.0% U W b 2 N � . - � .x i 4' ru E , C 7 t,� a�, �� 'a n W �'t ! . � . - , _ n T 42,000 SF 0.96 AC. ®� t�J /) O I� 0 °C 3 Z L LL Z CrS d .V S W J T 1 z i LL 0 ON= J N C rn Q .r w = LL 0.'s W t,-w a z N m -- U V! z IlY W Cr � W I- Q O U 0 O U2 3: 0 U EXISTING CL LL Z•QIc, to O 41 C It _ Floor area ratio (F.A.R.) for all nonresidential uses. 0UW NZO ° -fig ~z W L _LIII N �r T >a,U) o� Cr M = a. Z 't 0CCCC0 DATE: 2006 -02 -27 (1) w N ® U) Q; CC -070 ai T -C o o CD p- Z W b 2 N � . - � .x i 4' ru E , C 7 t,� a�, �� 'a n W �'t ! . � . - , _ n 20,000 SF 0.46 AC. 42,000 SF 0.96 AC. 0) LL 1 1 0 °C 3 Z L LL Z CrS d .V v "O O tV CC: Z W J 'm in- , -•" O) c O W Fes- zF-c� ai O E'm Z- C7 O tiX J N C rn Q .r w = LL 0.'s o t,-w a z uivw 2 v� m a W ;. IZ V! z IlY W Cr � W I- Q O U 0 O _ 3: 0 U EXISTING I= W Z•QIc, to O 41 C UX _ Floor area ratio (F.A.R.) for all nonresidential uses. 0UW NZO ° -fig ~z W L _LIII �r } o� v o Cr = a. Z 0CCCC0 DATE: 2006 -02 -27 CAD FILE PROPOSED AREA BREAKDOWN: AREA S. F. VEHICLE USE AREA 14 69 8 f BUILDING 6,203 7 STORMWATER PONDS 23998 OPEN GREEN SPACE 163458 SIDEWALK 13643 TOTAL COVERAGE 42,000 W b 2 N � . - � .x i 4' ru E , C 7 t,� a�, �� 'a n �+ •�= � 'g �'t ! . � . - , U 20,000 SF 0.46 AC. 42,000 SF 0.96 AC. - Number of EXISTING dwelling units; LL 1 1 _ Number of PROPOSED dwelling units; LL 1 1 Gross floor area devoted to each use; O�z 10,853 SF Parking spaces: total number, presented in tabular form with the moo W O 0 � W I� Cl) Cr IZ V! z IlY W Cr � W I- Q O U 0 O _ 3: 0 U EXISTING I= W _ Impermeable surface ratio (I.S.R.); and CC W J LL _ _ Floor area ratio (F.A.R.) for all nonresidential uses. 0UW 0.55 0.26 %� ,I I L _LIII �r {j�l li v L JOB NO. CAD FILE PROPOSED AREA BREAKDOWN: AREA S. F. VEHICLE USE AREA 14 69 8 f BUILDING 6,203 7 STORMWATER PONDS 23998 OPEN GREEN SPACE 163458 SIDEWALK 13643 TOTAL COVERAGE 42,000 O o OF SITE 0 / 35.0 0 O 1 4 .80 0 7.1% 39.20 3.90 100.0 %`_� b 2 N � . - � .x i 4' ru E , C 7 t,� a�, �� 'a n �+ •�= � 'g �'t ! . � . - , 42,000 SF 0.96 AC. 20,000 SF 0.46 AC. 42,000 SF 0.96 AC. - Number of EXISTING dwelling units; 1 1 1 _ Number of PROPOSED dwelling units; SITE DATA TABLE fore existing, required, and proposed development, in written/tabular form: N EXISTING REQUIRED PROPOSED - Land area in square feet and acres; 42,000 SF 0.96 AC. 20,000 SF 0.46 AC. 42,000 SF 0.96 AC. - Number of EXISTING dwelling units; 1 1 1 _ Number of PROPOSED dwelling units; 1 1 1 Gross floor area devoted to each use; 5,795 SF 10,853 SF Parking spaces: total number, presented in tabular form with the _ number of required'spaces; 0 44 44 Total paved area, including all paved parking spaces & driveways, expressed in square feet & percentage of the paved vehicular area; 0 SF 0.0% SCALE 0 14,698 SF 35.0% Official records book and page numbers of all existing utility tt,a _ easement; NONE NONE _ Building and structure heights; EXISTING 30 FT. 26.33 ft. _ Impermeable surface ratio (I.S.R.); and 0.40 0.95 0.45 _ Floor area ratio (F.A.R.) for all nonresidential uses. 0.13 0.55 0.26 N I iI. O C1l I REVISIONS > C if 1 ;U - i SCALE 0 0.511 1. tt,a o z O • "I DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: %� ,I I M _LIII PROJ. MAN.: {j�l li v JOB NO. DATE: 2006 -02 -27 w Q; SHEET NO. Pli "i A5 2,0c)coo-04 GENERAL CONSTRUCTION NOTES 1. LOCATIONS, ELEVATIONS, AND DIMENSIONS OF EXISTING UTILITIES, STRUCTURES, AND OTHER FEATURES ARE SHOWN ACCORDING TO INFORMATION AVAILABLE AT THE TIME OF PREPARATION OF THESE PLANS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY THE LOCATIONS, ELEVATIONS, AND DIMENSIONS OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES, STRUCTURES AND OTHER FEATURES AFFECTING THIS WORK PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. 2. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CHECK PLANS AND FIELD CONDITIONS FOR CONFLICTS AND DISCREPANCIES PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE OWNER'S ENGINEER OF ANY CONFLICT BEFORE PERFORMING ANY WORK IN THE AFFECTED AREA. 3. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR REPAIRING ANY DAMAGE TO EXISTING FACILITIES, ABOVE OR BELOW GROUND, THAT MAY OCCUR AS A RESULT OF THE WORK PERFORMED BY THE CONTRACTOR. 4. IT IS THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO BECOME FAMILIAR WITH THE PERMIT AND INSPECTION REQUIREMENTS OF THE VARIOUS GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN ALL NECESSARY PERMITS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION, AND SCHEDULE INSPECTIONS ACCORDING TO AGENCY INSTRUCTION. 5. ALL SPECIFICATIONS AND DOCUMENTS REFERRED TO SHALL BE OF LATEST REVISIONS AND /OR LATEST EDITION. 6. ALL WORK PERFORMED SHALL COMPLY WITH THE REGULATIONS AND ORDINANCES OF THE VARIOUS GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES HAVING JURISDICTION OVER THE WORK, INCLUDING LANDSCAPING. 7. CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT FOR REVIEW TO THE OWNER'S ENGINEER SHOP DRAWINGS ON ALL PRECAST AND MANUFACTURED ITEMS TO BE USED ON THIS SITE. FAILURE TO OBTAIN APPROVAL BEFORE INSTALLATION MAY RESULT IN REMOVAL AND REPLACEMENT AT CONTRACTOR'S EXPENSE. ENGINEER'S APPROVAL OF A SHOP DRAWING DOES NOT RELIEVE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY FOR PERFORMANCE OF THE ITEM. 8. WORK PERFORMED UNDER THIS CONTRACT SHALL INTERFACE SMOOTHLY WITH OTHER WORK BEING PERFORMED ON SITE BY OTHER CONTRACTORS AND UTILITY COMPANIES. IT WILL BE NECESSARY FOR THE CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE AND SCHEDULE HIS ACTIVITIES, WHERE NECESSARY WITH OTHER CONTRACTOR'S AND UTILITY COMPANIES. 9. BACKFILL MATERIAL SHALL BE SOLIDLY TAMPED AND COMPACTED TO A FIRMNESS EQUAL TO THAT OF THE SOIL ADJACENT TO THE TRENCH AROUND PIPES IN 6" LAYERS UP TO AN UNDISTURBED LEVEL OF AT LEAST V ABOVE THE TOP OF THE PIPE. IN AREAS TO BE PAVED, BACKFILL SHALL BE COMPACTED TO 100 % %% MAXIMUM DENSITY AS DETERMINED BY AASHTO T-99. 10. CONCRETE SHALL HAVE A COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH OF AT LEAST 3,000 P.S.I. IN 28 DAYS, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, SPECIFIED OR REQUIRED. 11. REINFORCING SHALL BE BILLET STEEL BARS CONFORMING TO ASTM A615 GRADE 40 OR BETTER. 12. THE CONTRACTOR /SUBCONTRACTOR SHALL PLACE A 1" DEEP CONTRACTION JOINT EVERY 4' IN THE SIDEWALK. 13. SIDEWALK CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE FLUSH WITH PAVEMENT WHERE THEY ARE ADJACENT OR MEET, UNLESS OTHERWISE SHOWN. 14. MATERIALS AND CONSTRUCTION METHODS FOR STREETS AND STORM DRAINAGE CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LOCAL REGULATORY AGENCY AND THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR ROAD AND BRIDGE CONSTRUCTION, 1994, OR LATEST REVISION THEREOF AND SUPPLEMENTAL SPECIFICATIONS THERETO. 15. ALL PIPE NOTED ON THE PLANS AS RCP SHALL BE REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE, CLASS 111, WITH RUBBER GASKET JOINTS. 16. REPAIR AND REPLACEMENT OF ALL PRIVATE AND PUBLIC PROPERTY AFFECTED BY THIS WORK SHALL BE RESTORED TO A CONDITION EQUAL TO OR BETTER THAN EXISTING CONDITIONS BEFORE COMMENCING CONSTRUCTION WORK UNLESS SPECIFICALLY EXEMPTED BY THE PLANS. ADDITIONAL COSTS ARE INCIDENTAL TO OTHER CONSTRUCTION AND NO EXTRA COMPENSATION WILL BE ALLOWED. 17. CLASS "B" TYPE I BEDDING SHALL BE USED UNLESS INDICATED OTHERWISE ON THE DRAWINGS, OR BY THE ENGINEER. 18. SOILS ENGINEER TO SUPPLY THE DESIGN ENGINEER WITH A PHOTOCOPY OF ALL COMPACTION TESTS, ASPHALT RESULTS, AND CONCRETE RESULTS THE SOILS ENGINEER IS TO CERTIFY TO THE DESIGN ENGINEER IN WRITING THAT ALL TESTING REQUIREMENTS REQUIRED BY THE LOCAL REGULATORY AGENCY AND THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (FDOT) FOR THE IMPROVEMENTS AS REQUIRED BY THE ENGINEERING CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS FOR THE ON -SITE HAVE BEEN SATISFIED. 19. CONTRACTOR SHALL REVIEW SOIL REPORTS AND BORINGS PRIOR TO BIDDING THE PROJECT AND COMMENCING CONSTRUCTION. 20. IRRIGATION SYSTEM SHALL HAVE COLOR CODED PIPING AND LABELING ON THE PIPE TO ENSURE DIFFERENTIATION FROM POTABLE WATER PIPING. 21. AT LEAST 3 WORKING DAYS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE ENGINEER AND APPROPRIATE AGENCIES AND SUPPLY THEM WITH ALL REQUIRED SHOP DRAWINGS, THE CONTRACTOR'S NAME, STARTING DATE, PROJECTED SCHEDULE, AND OTHER - INFORMATION AS REQUIRED. ANY WORK PERFORMED PRIOR TO NOTIFYINGTHE ENGINEER OR WITHOUT AGENCY INSPECTOR PRESENT MAY BE SUBJECT TO REMOVAL AND REPLACEMENT AT THE CONTRACTOR'S EXPENSE. 23. OWNER SPECIFIC SPECIFICATIONS TO BE PROVIDED TO CONTRACTOR DURING BIDDING. - RECORD DRAWINGS THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR RECORDING INFORMATION ON A SET OF THE APPROVED PLANS CONCURRENTLY WITH CONSTRUCTION PROGRESS. WITHIN TWO WEEKS FOLLOWING FINAL INSPECTION THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT ONE SET OF RECORD DRAWINGS TO THE ENGINEER OF RECORD. THE FINAL RECORD DRAWINGS SHALL COMPLY WITH THE FOLLOWING REQUIREMENTS: 1. DRAWINGS TO BE LEGIBLY MARKED TO RECORD ACTUAL CONSTRUCTION. 2. DRAWINGS SHALL SHOW ACTUAL LOCATION OF ALL UTILITIES, AND RELATED APPURTENANCES, BOTH ABOVE AND BELOW GROUND. ALL CHANGES TO PIPING LOCATION INCLUDING HORIZONTAL & VERTICAL LOCATIONS OF UTILITIES & APPURTENANCES SHALL BE CLEARLY SHOWN AND REFERENCED TO PERMANENT SURFACE IMPROVEMENTS. DRAWINGS SHALL ALSO SHOW ACTUAL INSTALLED PIPE MATERIAL, ETC. 3. DRAWINGS SHALL CLEARLY SHOW ALL FIELD CHANGES OF DIMENSION AND DETAIL INCLUDING CHANGES MADE BY FIELD ORDER OR BY CHANGE ORDER. 4. DRAWINGS SHALL CLEARLY SHOW ALL DETAILS NOT ON ORIGINAL CONTRACT DRAWINGS BUT CONSTRUCTED IN THE FIELD. ALL EQUIPMENT AND PIPING RELOCATION SHALL BE CLEARLY SHOWN. 5. LOCATIONS OF ALL MANHOLES, HYDRANTS, VALVES, & VALVE BOXES SHALL BE SHOWN. 6. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE CERTIFIED AS -BUILT DRAWINGS, SIGNED AND SEALED BY A PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR. THE AS -BUILT DRAWINGS SHALL SHOW FINAL GRADES AND LOCATIONS OF ALL UTILITIES INCLUDING SANITARY SEWER CLEAN OUT INVERTS, WATER LINE LOCATIONS, STORM SEWER STRUCTURE LOCATIONS, GRATE ELEVATIONS, INVERTS, AND POND DETAILS (INCLUDING TOP OF BANK AND BOTTOM DIMENSIONS AND ELEVATIONS), OUTFALL STRUCTURE DETAILS ( INCLUDING GRATE, WEIR, ORIFICE AND SKIMMER DIMENSIONS AND ELEVATIONS). THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE TEN COPIES OF THE CERTIFIED AS -BUILT DRAWINGS TO THE ENGINEER. 3 WORKING DAYS BEFORE YOU DIG CALL SUNSHINE STATE ONE CALL OF FLORIDA 1- 800 - 432 -4770 FOR THE LOCATION OF UNDERGROUND FACILITIES THE LOCATIONS OF EXISTING UNDERGROUND UTILITIES ARE SHOWN IN AN APPROXIMATE WAY ONLY AND HAVE NOT BEEN INDEPENDENTLY VERIFIED BY THE OWNER OR ITS REPRESENTATIVE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL DETERMINE THE EXACT LOCATION OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES BEFORE COMMENCING WORK, AND AGREES TO BE FULLY RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY AND ALL DAMAGES WHICH MIGHT BE OCCASIONED BY THE CONTRACTOR'S FAILURE TO EXACTLY LOCATE AND PRESERVE ANY AND ALL UNDERGROUND UTILITIES. STANDARD UTILITY NOTES 1. CHAPTER 77 -153 OF THE FLORIDA STATUTES REQUIRES THAT AN EXCAVATOR NOTIFY ALL GAS UTILITIES A MINIMUM OF TWO WORKING DAYS PRIOR TO EXCAVATING. MAPS SHOW ONLY THE APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF GAS MAINS AND DO NOT SHOW SERVICE LINES. THE ONLY SAFE AND PROPER WAY TO LOCATE EITHER MAINS OR SERVICE LINES IS BY AN ON -SITE INSPECTION BY THE RESPECTIVE GAS PERSONNEL. THEREFORE, EXCAVATORS ARE INSTRUCTED TO TELEPHONE THE RESPECTIVE GAS COMPANY TWO WORKING DAYS BEFORE ENTERING A CONSTRUCTION AREA. 2. ALL UNDERGROUND UTILITIES MUST BE IN PLACE, TESTED AND INSPECTED AS REQUIRED PRIOR TO BASE AND SURFACE CONSTRUCTION. 3. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL EXERCISE EXTREME CAUTION IN AREAS OF BURIED UTILITIES AND SHALL PROVIDE AT LEAST 48 HOURS NOTICE TO THE VARIOUS UTILITY COMPANIES IN ORDER TO PERMIT MARKING THE LOCATIONS OF EXISTING UNDERGROUND UTILITIES IN ADVANCE OF CONSTRUCTION, BY CALLING FLORIDA SUNSHINE STATE ONE CALL CENTER OF FLORIDA, INC. AT 1- 800-432 -4770. IT IS THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO NOTIFY "SUNSHINE" FORTY -EIGHT (48) HOURS PRIOR TO ANY CLEARING OF CONSTRUCTION TO IDENTIFY ALL UTILITY LOCATIONS. 4. IT IS THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO NOTIFY ALL UTILITY COMPANIES TO DISCONNECT OR REMOVE THEIR FACILITIES PRIOR TO REMOVING OR DEMOLISHING ANY EXISTING STRUCTURES FROM THE SITE. ALL UTILITIES INCLUDING, BUT NOT NECESSARILY LIMITED TO, THE FOLLOWING SHOULD BE CONTACTED BY THE CONTRACTOR: 1. GAS 2. TELEPHONE 3. WATER 4. POWER 5. CITY SEWER 6. CITY /COUNTY /STATE TRAFFIC SIGNAL UTILITY (FIBER, HARDWIRE TRAFFIC SIGNAL INTERCONNECT) 5. THE LOCATION OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES SHOWN ON THE PLANS HAVE BEEN DETERMINED FROM THE BEST INFORMATION AVAILABLE. THE ENGINEER ASSUMES NO RESPONSIBILITY FOR ITS ACCURACY. IT SHALL BE THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO NOTIFY THE VARIOUS UTILITY OWNERS AND TO MAKE THE NECESSARY ARRANGEMENTS FOR ANY RELOCATIONS OR REMOVALS WITH THE OWNER OF THE UTILITY. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL EXERCISE CAUTION WHEN CROSSING ANY UNDERGROUND UTILITY, WHETHER SHOWN ON THE PLANS OR LOCATED BY THE UTILITY COMPANY. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CHECK PLANS AND FIELD CONDITIONS FOR CONFLICTS AND DISCREPANCIES PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE OWNER'S ENGINEER OF ANY CONFLICT BEFORE PERFORMING ANY WORK IN THE AFFECTED AREA. SAFETY NOTES 1. DURING THE CONSTRUCTION AND /OR MAINTENANCE OF THIS PROJECT, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COMPLY WITH REGULATIONS. THE CONTRACTOR OR HIS REPRESENTATIVE SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE CONTROL AND SAFETY OF THE TRAVELING PUBLIC AND THE SAFETY OF ITS PERSONNEL. LABOR SAFETY REGULATIONS SHALL BE AS SET FORTH BY OSHA IN THE FEDERAL REGISTER OF THE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR. 2. THE MINIMUM STANDARDS AS SET FORTH IN THE CURRENT EDITION OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA, MANUAL ON TRAFFIC CONTROL AND SAFE PRACTICES FOR STREET AND HIGHWAY CONSTRUCTION, MAINTENANCE AND UTILITY OPERATIONS SHALL BE FOLLOWED IN THE DESIGN APPLICATION, INSTALLATION, MAINTENANCE, AND REMOVAL OF ALL TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES, WARNING DEVICES, AND BARRIERS NECESSARY TO PROTECT THE PUBLIC AND WORKERS FROM HAZARDS WITHIN THE PROJECT LIMITS. 3. ALL TRAFFIC CONTROL MARKINGS, FLAGGERS, AND DEVICES SHALL CONFORM TO THE PROVISIONS SET FORTH IN THE MANUAL ON UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES PREPARED BY THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION. 4. IT SHALL BE THE SOLE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO COMPLY WITH AND ENFORCE ALL APPLICABLE SAFETY REGULATIONS. THE ABOVE INFORMATION HAS BEEN PROVIDED FOR THE CONTRACTOR'S INFORMATION ONLY AND DOES NOT IMPLY THAT THE OWNER OR ENGINEER WILL INSPECT AND /OR ENFORCE SAFETY REGULATIONS. PAVING AND GRADING NOTES 1. ALL DELETERIOUS MATERIAL (I.E., MUCK, PEAT, BURIED DEBRIS) IS TO BE EXCAVATED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THESE PLANS OR AS DIRECTED BY THE OWNER'S ENGINEER OR OWNER'S SOIL TESTING COMPANY. DELETERIOUS MATERIAL IS TO BE STOCKPILED OR REMOVED FROM THE SITE AS DIRECTED BY THE OWNER. EXCAVATED AREAS ARE TO BE BACKFILLED WITH APPROVED MATERIALS AND COMPACTED AS SHOWN ON THESE PLANS. 2. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PROTECTING EXCAVATIONS AGAINST COLLAPSE AND SHALL PROVIDE BRACING, SHEETING OR SHORING AS NECESSARY. TRENCHES SHALL BE KEPT DRY WHILE PIPE AND APPURTENANCES ARE BEING PLACED. DEWATERING SHALL BE USED AS REQUIRED, AND PERMITTED THROUGH LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES AND WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT PER CURRENT REGULATIONS. 3. PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATIONS REPRESENT FINISHED PAVEMENT OR GROUND SURFACE GRADE UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED ON DRAWINGS. 4. REFER TO THE LATEST EDITION OF FDOT "ROADWAY AND TRAFFIC DESIGN STANDARDS" FOR DETAILS AND SPECIFICATIONS OF ALL FDOT TYPE CURBING AND GUTTERS CALLED FOR ON THESE PLANS. 5. IT MAY BE NECESSARY TO FIELD ADJUST PAVEMENT ELEVATIONS TO PRESERVE THE ROOT SYSTEMS OF TREES SHOWN TO BE SAVED. CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE WITH OWNER'S ENGINEER PRIOR TO ANY ELEVATION CHANGES. 6. PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION OF CONCRETE PAVEMENT, THE CONTRACTOR IS TO SUBMIT A PROPOSED JOINTING PATTERN TO THE OWNER'S ENGINEER FOR REVIEW. 7. CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE A 1/2" BITUMINOUS EXPANSION JOINT MATERIAL WITH SEALER AT ABUTMENT OF CONCRETE AND ANY STRUCTURE. 8. ALL PAVEMENT MARKINGS SHALL BE MADE WITH PERMANENT THERMOPLASTIC AND SHALL CONFORM TO FDOT STANDARD INDEX NO. 17346, SHEETS 1 -7. PARKING STALL STRIPING TO BE 4" WIDE PAINTED STRIPES. ON -SITE STRIPE COLOR SHALL BE WHITE EXCEPT AS SHOWN ON THE ENGINEERING PLANS. PARKING STALL STRIPING SHALL BE COMPATIBLE WITH THE PAVEMENT TYPE (IE CONCRETE, ASPHALT) AND SPECIFICATIONS SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE ENGINEER FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL. 9. CONTRACTOR SHALL TRIM, TACK, AND MATCH EXISTING PAVEMENT AT LOCATIONS WHERE NEW PAVEMENT MEETS EXISTING PAVEMENT. 10. CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL STORM PIPING AND CULVERTS IN ACCORDANCE WITH FDOT INDEX 205 AND PLACE EXTRA BASE MATERIAL WHEN THE DISTANCE BETWEEN THE PAVEMENT ELEVATION AND THE TOP OF THE PIPE OR BELL IS LESS THAN TWELVE (12) INCHES. 11. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR COORDINATING APPLICABLE TESTING WITH THE SOILS ENGINEER. TESTS WILL BE REQUIRED PURSUANT TO THE TESTING SCHEDULE REQUIRED BY APPLICABLE REGULATORY AGENCIES AND AS MAY BE FOUND IN THE ENGINEERING CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS. CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY ALL TESTING WITH THE OWNER PRIOR TO COMMENCING CONSTRUCTION. UPON COMPLETION OF THE WORK, THE SOILS ENGINEER MUST SUBMIT TO THE OWNER'S ENGINEER CERTIFICATIONS STATING THAT ALL REQUIREMENTS HAVE BEEN MET. DRAINAGE SYSTEM NOTES 1. STANDARD INDEXES REFER TO THE LATEST EDITION OF FDOT "ROADWAY AND TRAFFIC DESIGN STANDARDS ". 2. ALL STORM SEWER PIPE SHALL BE REINFORCED CONCRETE CLASS III (ASTM C -76) UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED ON PLANS. ALL DRAINAGE STRUCTURES SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH FDOT ROADWAY AND TRAFFIC DESIGN STANDARDS UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED ON PLANS. 3. PIPE LENGTHS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE AND TO THE CENTER OF DRAINAGE STRUCTURES WITH THE EXCEPTION OF MITERED END AND FLARED END SECTIONS WHICH ARE INCLUDED IN LENGTHS. 4. ALL DRAINAGE STRUCTURE GRATES AND COVERS WITHIN TRAFFIC AREAS SHALL BE TRAFFIC RATED FOR H -20 LOADINGS. 5. CONTRACTOR TO SOD THE DETENTION POND AS INDICATED ON PLANS WITHIN ONE WEEK FOLLOWING CONSTRUCTION OF THE POND. 6. THE STORM DRAINAGE PIPING AND FILTRATION SYSTEM SHALL BE SUBJECT TO A VISUAL INSPECTION BY THE OWNER'S ENGINEER PRIOR TO THE PLACEMENT OF BACKFILL. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE A FINAL INSPECTION OF THE COMPLETED STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM PRIOR TO FINAL ACCEPTANCE BY THE OWNER. CONTRACTOR TO NOTIFY THE ENGINEER 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE TO SCHEDULE WATER SYSTEM NOTES 1. A VERTICAL CLEARANCE OF 18 INCHES SHALL BE MAINTAINED BETWEEN SANITARY SEWERS AND WATER MAINS. IF CLEARANCE CANNOT BE ACHIEVED BY ADJUSTING WATER MAINS THE' SANITARY SEWER SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED PER SANITARY NOTE No. 1 BELOW. 2. A HORIZONTAL SEPARATION OF 10 FEET SHALL BE MAINTAINED BETWEEN WATER MAINS AND SANITARY SEWER. 3. ALL WATER MAINS SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM OF 36 INCHES OF COVER. 4. ALL WATER SYSTEM WORK SHALL CONFORM WITH LOCAL REGULATORY STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS. 5. CONFLICTS BETWEEN WATER AND STORM OR SANITARY SEWER TO BE RESOLVED BY ADJUSTING THE WATER LINES AS NECESSARY. 6. ALL DUCTILE IRON PIPE SHALL BE CLASS 52 IN ACCORDANCE WITH ANSI A 21.50 (AWWA C150) AND ANSI A 21.51 (AWWA C151) AND PIPE SHALL RECEIVE EXTERIOR BITUMINOUS COATING IN ACCORDANCE WITH ANSI A 21.6, A 21.8 OR A 21.51 AND SHALL BE MORTAR LINED, STANDARD THICKNESS, AND BITUMINOUS SEALED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ANSI A (AWWA C 104 -71). 7. ALL FITTINGS LARGER THAN 2" SHALL BE DUCTILE IRON CLASS 53 IN ACCORDANCE WITH AWWA C -110 WITH A PRESSURE RATING OF 350 PSI. JOINTS SHALL BE MECHANICAL JOINTS IN ACCORDANCE WITH AWWA C -111. FITTINGS SHALL BE CEMENT MORTAR LINED AND COATED IN ACCORDANCE WITH AWWA C -104. 8. CONTRACTOR TO INSTALL TEMPORARY BLOW -OFFS AT THE END OF WATER SERVICE LATERALS TO ASSURE ADEQUATE FLUSHING AND DISINFECTION. 9. THRUST BLOCKING AND /OR RESTRAINED JOINTS SHALL BE PROVIDED AT ALL FITTINGS AND HYDRANTS IN ACCORDANCE WITH AWWA STANDARDS. 10. ALL PVC WATER MAINS 4" THROUGH 12" SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH AWWA C -900. PIPE SHALL BE CLASS 150 AND MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF SDR 18 IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM D -2241. 11. ALL FITTINGS 2" AND SMALLER SHALL BE SCHEDULE 40 PVC WITH SOLVENT WELDED SLEEVE TYPE JOINTS. 12. ALL WATER MAINS AND WATER SERVICES TO BE INSTALLED UNDER ROAD UNDERDRAIN SHALL MAINTAIN 18" SEPARATION. 13. MATERIALS AND CONSTRUCTION METHODS FOR WATER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LOCAL REGULATORY AGENCY CODES, PLANS, AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION, LATEST REVISION THEREOF AND SUPPLEMENTAL SPECIFICATIONS THERETO. APPROVAL AND CONSTRUCTION OF ALL POTABLE WATER SERVICE MAIN EXTENSIONS AND CONNECTIONS MUST BE COORDINATED THROUGH THE LOCAL REGULATORY AGENCY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC UTILITIES. 14. ALL COMPONENTS OF THE WATER SYSTEM, INCLUDING FITTINGS, HYDRANTS, CONNECTIONS, AND VALVES SHALL REMAIN UNCOVERED UNTIL PROPERLY PRESSURE TESTED AND ACCEPTED BY THE OWNER'S ENGINEER. PRESSURE TESTS TO BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH WATER DEPARTMENT AND AWWA SPECIFICATIONS. CONTRACTOR TO NOTIFY OWNER'S ENGINEER AND WATER DEPARTMENT INSPECTORS 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE OF PERFORMING TESTS. 15. CONTRACTOR TO PERFORM CHLORINATION AND BACTERIOLOGICAL SAMPLING REQUIRED TO.OBTAIN CLEARANCE OF DOMESTIC WATER SYSTEM THROUGH LOCAL REGULATORY AGENCIES. COPIES OF ALL BACTERIOLOGICAL TESTS TO BE SUBMITTED TO OWNER'S ENGINEER. SANITARY SEWER NOTES 1. PER FAC 62- 604.400 (2)(G) "SEWERS CROSSING UNDER WATER MAINS SHALL BE LAID TO PROVIDE A MINIMUM VERTICAL DISTANCE OF 18 INCHES BETWEEN THE INVERT OF THE UPPER PIPE & THE CROWN OF THE LOWER PIPE. WHERE THIS MINIMUM SEPARATION CANNOT BE MAINTAINED, THE CROSSING SHALL BE ARRANGED SO THAT THE SEWER PIPE JOINTS & WATER MAIN JOINTS ARE EQUIDISTANT FROM THE POINT OF CROSSING WITH NO LESS THAN 10 FEET BETWEEN ANY TWO JOINTS. ALTERNATIVELY, THE SEWER MAIN MAY BE ENCASED IN A SLEEVE OR ENCASED IN CONCRETE TO OBTAIN THE EQUIVALENT OF THE REQUIRED 10 FEET SEPARATION." 2. A HORIZONTAL SEPARATION OF 10 FEET SHALL BE MAINTAINED BETWEEN WATER MAINS AND SANITARY SEWER. 3. ALL SANITARY SEWER MAINS & SERVICE LATERALS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED OF POLYVINYL CHLORIDE PIPE, SDR 35. 4. ALL SANITARY SEWER WORK SHALL CONFORM WITH LOCAL REGULATORY STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS. 5. PRIOR TO COMMENCING WORK WHICH REQUIRES CONNECTING NEW WORK TO EXISTING LINES OR APPURTENANCES, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY LOCATION AND ELEVATION OF EXISTING CONNECTION POINT AND NOTIFY OWNER'S ENGINEER OF ANY CONFLICTS OR DISCREPANCIES 6. PVC PIPE AND FITTINGS SHALL CONFORM WITH A.S.T.M. SPECIFICATIONS DESIGNATION D- 3034 -77C, MA SDR 35. INSTALLATION OF SDR PIPE SHALL BE IN STRICT ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF A.S.T.M. SPECIFICATION DESIGNATION D2321. ALL SANITARY SEWER PIPELINES SHALL BE SOLID GREEN IN COLOR. 7. ALL PVC FORCE MAINS WITHIN PUBLIC R/W SHALL BE CLASS 200, SDR 21, WITH MECHANICAL JOINTS, AND HAVE A GREEN MAGNETIC TAPE A MINIMUM OF 3" WIDE, PLACED 24" BELOW THE PROPOSED GRADE.THE PRINT ON THE MAGNETIC TAPE SHOULD READ "FORCE MAIN ". 8. ALL DUCTILE IRON PIPE SHALL BE CLASS 52 IN ACCORDANCE WITH ANSI A 21.50 (AWWA C150) AND ANSI 21.51 (AWWA C 151). H.C. PIPE SHALL RECEIVE INTERIOR AND EXTERIOR BITUMINOUS COATING IN ACCORDANCE WITH ANSI A 21.6, A 21.8, OR A 21.51. 9. ALL SANITARY SEWER GRAVITY MAINS OR SANITARY SEWER FORCE MAINS THAT REQUIRE D.I.P. ARE TO BE POLYLINED OR EPDXY LINED. 10. ALL SANITARY SEWER COVERS SHALL BE TRAFFIC RATED FOR H -20 LOADING. 11. SANITARY SEWERS SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM COVER OF THREE (3) FEET AND SHALL BE INSTALLED ACCOMPANIED BY A METAL TAPE SIMILAR TO'TERRATAPE" COLORED GREEN AND LAID ONE FOOT ABOVE THE PIPE. 12. ALL GRAVITY SEWER PIPING SHALL BE SUBJECT TO A VISUAL INSPECTION BY THE OWNER'S ENGINEER. CONTRACTOR TO NOTIFY THE ENGINEER 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE TO SCHEDULE INSPECTION. 13. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PERFORM AN INFILTRATION /EXFILTRATION TEST ON ALL GRAVITY SEWERS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REGULATORY AGENCY HAVING JURISDICTION. SAID TESTS ARE TO BE CERTIFIED BY THE ENGINEER AND SUBMITTED TO THE REGULATORY AGENCY FOR APPROVAL. COORDINATION AND NOTIFICATION OF ALL PARTIES IS THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY. 14. ALL FORCE MAINS SHALL BE SUBJECT TO A HYDROSTATIC PRESSURE TEST IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REGULATORY AGENCY HAVING JURISDICTION. SAID TESTS ARE TO BE CERTIFIED BY THE ENGINEER AND SUBMITTED TO THE REGULATORY AGENCY FOR APPROVAL COORDINATION AND NOTIFICATION OF ALL PARTIES IS CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY. ®• • • ®• • • ® PROPERTY LINE I� PROPOSED ASPHALT PAVEMENT U. HANDICAP PARKING SPACE T T GEOTECHNICAL NOTE: 10 0 0 CONTRACTOR TO REVIEW AND FOLLOW CONSTRUCTION TECHNIQUES OUTLINED IN THE SITE PROPOSED ELEVATION CO 00 PROPOSED DITCH BOTTOM INLET GEOTECHNICAL REPORT. .°` STORM SEWER STRUCTURE NUMBER CO N 0 STORM PIPE LL C r LL 0) � ® FLARED END SECTION ' � STORM MANHOLE CLEARING AND EROSION CONTROL NOTES ® 0 d. 0 -*-r\.- 1. PRIOR TO ANY SITE CLEARING, ALL TREES SHOWN TO REMAIN ON THE CONSTRUCTION F- W JO cm J PLANS SHALL BE PROTECTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LOCAL REGULATORY AGENCY'S POND SLOPE LL Q EROSION CONTROL TREE ORDINANCE AND DETAILS CONTAINED IN THESE PLANS. IT SHALL BE THE CONTRACTOR'S? WM WATER MAIN ,., { 2 RESPONSIBILITY TO MAINTAIN THESE TREES IN GOOD CONDITION. NO TREES SHOWN TO REMAIN SHALL © •> r , BACKFLOW PREVENTER BE REMOVED WITHOUT WRITTEN APPROVAL FROM THE OWNER. ONLY "GRADING BY HAND IS LO V a. LL GATE VALVE PERMITTED WITHIN THE CANOPY LINE OF TREES THAT ARE TO REMAIN. •U FIRE HYDRANT 2. THE CONTRACTOR IS TO PREPARE THE SITE PRIOR TO BEGINNING ACTUAL CONSTRUCTION ► REDUCER IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE SOILS TESTING REPORT. COPIES OF THE SOILS REPORT ARE v, W 00 0 BLOWOFF °� AVAILABLE THROUGH THE OWNER OR THE SOILS TESTING COMPANY. QUESTIONS -[, E 0 REGARDING SITE PREPARATION REQUIREMENTS DESCRIBED IN THE SOILS REPORT ARE TO �' Q r BE DIRECTED TO THE SOILS TESTING COMPANY. C== (D O SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE 3. CONTRACTOR SHALL CLEAR AND GRUB ONLY THOSE PORTIONS OF THE SITE NECESSARY > 0 +-a /-' FOR CONSTRUCTION. DISTURBED AREAS WILL BE SEEDED, MULCHED, OR PLANTED WITH oc /o dam' OTHER OTHER APPROVED LANDSCAPE MATERIAL IMMEDIATELY FOLLOWING CONSTRUCTION. (n 4. THE TOP 4" TO 6" OF GROUND REMOVED DURING CLEARING AND GRUBBING SHALL BE STOCKPILED AT A SITE DESIGNATED BY THE OWNER TO BE USED FOR LANDSCAPING PURPOSES, UNLESS OTHERWISE DIRECTED BY THE OWNER. HAY BALES SHALL BE PLACED ALONG THE STOCKPILE PERIMETER FOR EROSION CONTROL. i 5. ALL CONSTRUCTION DEBRIS AND OTHER WASTE MATERIAL SHALL BE DISPOSED OF OFF -SITE IN CO ACCORDANCE WITH APPLICABLE REGULATIONS. J r O 0 6. CONTRACTOR TO OBTAIN ALL NECESSARY PERMITS FOR REMOVING ANY EXISTING STRUCTURES. (O 7. CONTRACTOR TO OBTAIN SITE CLEARING & TREE REMOVAL PERMIT PRIOR TO INSTALLATION T OF ANY UNDERGROUND UTILITIES AND CLEARING THE SITE. 8. PROTECTION OF EXISTING STORM SEWER SYSTEMS: DURING CONSTRUCTION, ALL STORM, SEWER INLETS IN THE .; ,; -;_ VICINITY OF THE PROJECT SHALL BE PROTECTED BY SEDIMENT TRAPS I' SUCH AS SECURED HAY BALES, SOD, STONE, ETC., WHICH SHALL BE MAINTAINED AND MODIFIED AS REQUIRED BY CONSTRUCTION PROGRESS." 9. ALL DISTURBED AREAS WHICH ARE NOT TO BE SODDED ARE TO BE SEEDED AND ' c MULCHED; TO FDOT STANDARDS AND MAINTAINED UNTIL A SATISFACTORY STAND OF GRASS �t A CCEPTABLE TO THE REGULATORY AGENCY AND ENGINEER HAVE BEEN OBTAINED. ANY WASHOUTS, REGRADING, RESEEDING, AND GRASSING WORK, AND OTHER EROSION WORK I'` `- REQUIRED, WILL BE PERFORMED BY THE CONTRACTOR UNTIL THE SYSTEM IS ACCEPTED FOR MAINTENANCE BY THE REGULATORY AGENCY AND ENGINEER. 10. CONTRACTOR IS TO PROVIDE EROSION CONTROL/SEDIMENTATION BARRIER (STRAW BALE W OR STAKED SILT FENCE) TO PREVENT SILTATION OF ADJACENT PROPERTY, STREETS, STORM SEWERS, WATERWAYS, AND EXISTING WETLANDS. IN ADDITION, CONTRACTOR SHALL PLACE STRAW, MULCH, OR OTHER SUITABLE MATERIAL ON GROUND IN AREAS WHERE co m CONSTRUCTION RELATED TRAFFIC IS TO ENTER AND EXIT THE SITE. IF, IN THE OPINION OF THE o m z ENGINEER AND /OR LOCAL AUTHORITIES, EXCESSIVE QUANTITIES OF EARTH ARE TRANSPORTED Z o= 0 OFF -SITE EITHER BY NATURAL DRAINAGE OR BY VEHICULAR TRAFFIC THE CONTRACTOR IS TO ? w v c-u RECOVER SAID EARTH TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE ENGINEER AND /OR AUTHORITIES. w z' aj t 11. IF WIND EROSION BECOMES SIGNIFICANT DURING CONSTRUCTION, THE CONTRACTOR ? D 9 m E- SHALL STABILIZE THE AFFECTED AREA USING SPRINKLING, IRRIGATION, OR OTHER ,� W = W;,' ; `_`; _j �', w LL W m ACCEPTABLE METHODS. W r'� t a• m 8 12. THERE SHALL BE NO DISCHARGE (I.E. PUMPING, SHEET FLOW, SWALE, DITCH, ETC.) INTO �` E ,; N N m EXISTING LAKE SYSTEM, WETLAND, OR RIVER, WITHOUT THE USE OF SETTLING PONDS. IF a° °� o m m THE CONTRACTOR DESIRES TO DISCHARGE INTO THE EXISTING LAKE SYSTEM OR RIVER, A tv SETTLING POND PLAN MUST BE SUBMITTED AND APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER AND LOCAL °tom °m ,� '• a y '�, REGULATORY AGENCY PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. a NZO 1-fZ W ooU- � MOW o}�Z z 0cc0 L E (3:� E N [0 r ®• • • ®• • • ® PROPERTY LINE I� PROPOSED ASPHALT PAVEMENT U. HANDICAP PARKING SPACE F- T SIGNAGE 10 # OF PARKING SPACES 9•� PROPOSED ELEVATION 0 PROPOSED DITCH BOTTOM INLET U � D -1 STORM SEWER STRUCTURE NUMBER p 0 STORM PIPE LL ® MITERED END SECTION � ® FLARED END SECTION ��o � STORM MANHOLE > - SWALE STORMWATER FLOW 3: -*-r\.- SURFACE STORMWATER FLOW F- 0.50% SLOPE OF PAVEMENT J 4'1 a POND SLOPE LL Q EROSION CONTROL WM WATER MAIN ,., { 2 W ® BACKFLOW PREVENTER 0 LO ►� GATE VALVE T' •U FIRE HYDRANT ► REDUCER v, W o B/O BLOWOFF °� -[, WATER METER (DOUBLE) 0 CHLORINE INJECTION POINT OS WATERLINE SAMPLE POINT S -2 SANITARY SEWER STRUCTURE NUMBER ® SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE ss SANITARY SEWER MAIN /-' SANITARY SEWER SERVICE LATERAL oc /o SANITARY SEWER CLEAN OUT SEE SURVEY FOR EXISTING ITEMS LEGEND JI CO 0 Z O U. F- U- U ®QD LL ~ U � oC 0 p 0 LL H p a � IY Z ��o � W 3: p F•' O F- cr QFE W J J LL Q O() w W W M 0 LO T' CAD FILE HARRISON PSP REVISIONS SCALE 0 0.5" 1" DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: PROJ. MAN.: JOB NO. DATE: 2008 -02 -27 SHEET NO.. C=2 3 WORKING DAYS BEFORE YOU DIG CALL SUNSHINE STATE ONE O CALL OF FLORIDA 1- 800 - 432 -4770 FOR THE LOCATION OF UNDERGROUND FACILITIES THE LOCATIONS OF EXISTING UNDERGROUND UTILITIES ARE SHOWN IN AN APPROXIMATE WAY ONLY AND HAVE NOT BEEN INDEPENDENTLY VERIFIED BY THE OWNER OR ITS REPRESENTATIVE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL DETERMINE THE EXACT LOCATION OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES BEFORE COMMENCING WORK, AND AGREES TO BE FULLY RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY AND ALL DAMAGES WHICH MIGHT BE OCCASIONED BY THE CONTRACTOR'S FAILURE TO EXACTLY LOCATE AND PRESERVE ANY AND ALL UNDERGROUND UTILITIES. bj° F RSD4086 1R o -- -- ALL C CONC. ORETAINING Not plait RETENTION POND Platted \ GG .,,__ • • _ _ y0' EXISTING WOOD BRIDGE Y EAST BOUNDARY OF WEST 1/2 OF \ �, 9Pp. $ •�G` ' \ 0c TO BE REMOVED SE 1/4 OF SE 1/4 OF SECTION EN NKNOF WALL 21-29-15 79.5 S 7956'18,,E �T•a"— \ry rr _ 432' "e 3p 05, 90•(D) o r S -86'(A4) / \ N \. / / l �' ( ` �` ' \ R �r r SOUTHEAST Of ti o �.. C. - % " \ / e. r(rr� .o \ e /560 CORN p j \ \ 1 c� �- I \ �J \ \ ' �� • , , • • • / r M o / 114' 5 FEET OF- ER OF THE NORTH p \ \�P ,Q. \ \ \ Q , - •• - ----- \ ( �{.�I �� ..jam ... r`'`�6 � ' 0• FOUN F SE., 1 /4 pp SS 1/2 OF '\ b Z_�. > \ / \\ \ 9 rim r I ! �� J /BRFOOT •tr r_ ` I / G, /8 I (LS 40 TI 21-2g_ \ D�E G 1�`� �• O 3 R 6C ON E 1 REMOVEABLE J� - �� JdIL., _ _L `�. �` in •I �� • . � • ) 5\ c3 `z TRAFFIC / \\ ° BOLLARDS / �� °' Y '_ ''`+•. -�.�., `'rrr o5� 1 \ •'•� % \ I DUMP. ( 11 I ` ENCL 1 \( PERIMETER BUFFER ?``'•-- rrr`r_ I ire° ooh' •�,.r , . ry'```'"r \ \ \ STREET �: \•' \ I / J / (NON-RESIDENTIAL ( -_ ._ - -.- - _,�.r., \! , , � , • . SIGN ADJACENT \ / / -- ADJACENT USE) \ \ •\ \ FLUSH CONC. CURB `c TY TY CONC. i / 1 1 \ \ \ \ _ _ / r /r��` -� -°" °u'.. -- '\ \ / °. o• \ LINE STORM\WATER \ \ 18 POND—EL i \ \ it I ) �. �� _. �L _ �J Lj C.B. RETAINING WALL l (APPROX 1.5' HIGH) IN RIOR 0 6 o D A EA (17$ S�F) >` \ 6' WHITE 9 �RlPZ1G. _ - ' �- DRIP LINE PERIMETER BUFFER , it3 ' (TYPICAL) (CO TOR R/W INTERIOR \ <% `i\• .;e' \; ACENT USE) LANDSCAPE INTERIOR �_ I LANDSCAPE \ I \ �` ,� s� F,•? 1 SITE VISIBILITY AREA (164 SF) \ o s P AREA 208 S ! \\ <� �yF� \�� . 1 TRIANG / >•� \ \ ( INTERIOR a TYPE'D'CONC:_••_• LANDSCAPE JEA� OF o \Y •\ � / I 1 ,�l I / CURB (TYP.) � \ AREA (155 SF) . \PERIMETEFjt3UF (NGN- Rr=SIDENTIAk \ 11a o � I \ \ i i / \ 9 ADJACENT USED / A[�A COMPLIANT RAMP �� I a, \ b �'•• I( ( \ 9' TYPED' CONC. \ '� nrnrll •'•'•'•' ' ! WITH DETECTABLE 1 rn , INTERIOR WARNING STRIPS \ \ CURB (fYP.) 1 \. _ _'_ - / / /� \ \• yy / e \ u1,ti/ ' LANDSCAPE 1 O / cAREA (122 SF) I .l \ `5 INTER[ R ' (� \ y° °SMI D LANDS APE V \ G 1 DRIP \ C`� ° ° ° AREA 397 SF) _ -. _ _ ea o i \ \ <° ' STOP SIGN d ' LINE ° G•" Q \ F� *� % 6 N\LLOW STRIPE �o 5 a a o (R1 -1) cj O \`\ ° ° S.- 0 \ P 3 3' o �' / cd \\ 20 -per•• /O `_ ONUM SIGN \ a e ` �\ 4�'. t\t \ O 2'00 ETECTABLE \ A� choe •o� ORE SE BY� 0- : '332 I O \ WARNIf SURFACE G ,� ° C� ° o� � s 2 4 �G PER FDOTiNDEX304 9 <� . 2� = yG0? �. *' _ ;.y EXISTING CONC. ' o O ° 6.16 EXISTING STEPS RAMP TO BE T MW T 24" WHITE'$TOP BAR O • •'•','i �' • 9 I W ° EpS�� +CR`�~f TO BE REMOVED REMOVED I Sp, •\ ` — — �, QRDGH.p" O �1 DRIP U (d r O .'.., ��Pg INTERIOR LANDSCAPE LINE �{� eA. \ G N — \ O 0. \ 00 -� `� ENTRANCE\ FAPABLE ti <� .' O \ AREA (264 SF) gv \\ p \N / I ( \•\ U \ y A (� OF STAPKING 2 i yL C) CARS FRQM 1st • / i / GOMM 39.93 DRIP / / W °T F` PARKING SPA TO PERIMETER BUFFER SOLAR R E� ' LINE J �F2 THROUGH E \ l WATER \ (COLLECTOR R/W GR`f MP \SN F�C� \5�3 /JJJ �ti WALV 3.12' of E. y� MET.ER � EDGE ADJACENT USE) \ & \\ Lp ! ' WOOp ALSO DFOUNDI 5/851R4 (NO ID) \ THROUGH LANE \\ \' 1y o 6 i 0.77'N. & 0,64'w. 'O \ FENCE / FENCE CORNER \ \ � <Cy \ 1/• ro � i —•'.� / 0.805 & 0.37•E �6. l o i / oa \ •' , . • \W E K PERIMETER BUFFER _ (NON- RESIDENTIAL \\ o <� \\ •• ry I \ —'— J ' \?o �e 1 •. wo�E Pov>;RNEP�p�Pil — — — — — ADJACENT USE) J 2 OFi�ETECTABLE _ N 4� ` > •o" \ l ti / \ WARNINQ SURFACE PER FDOT)NDEX 304 ssr ` \�Q. \ _ J n \ye / tie _s �'t'" •' I �86� 0) o• 0.� \ i • •/1 \ 13 1/81 \\ o o \ , 1� FEN By \o 69 GO lPppRFLCpR \ \•\ J ti ooa EXISTING STAIRS TO BE REMOVED F \\\ \SN \ \,\ LIGHTING NOTES: \ \\ ALL SITE LIGHTING IS ANTICIPATED TO BE BUILDING MOUNTED. \'\ ALL LIGHT FIXTURES WHICH ARE VISIBLE FROM THE BOUNDARIES \ OF THE PARCEL OF LAND, OTHER THAN FIXTURES WHICH ARE \ DESIGNED AND INSTALLED TO ILLUMINATE A WALL AND ARE \. DIRECTED AWAY FROM ADJACENT PROPERTIES, SHALL BE CUT -OFF LIGHTS WHERE DIRECT ILLUMINATION IS CUT -OFF ABOVE 40 \ DEGREES BELOW HORIZONTAL. \\ LOCATION. ALL OUTDOOR LIGHT FIXTURES SHALL BE LOCATED SO THAT OBJECTS OR LAND WHICH ARE LOCATED BEYOND THE \ \ BOUNDARIES OF THE PARCEL OF LAND ARE NOT ILLUMINATED TO \ \ AN EXTENT OF PRODUCING MORE THAN A DIFFUSE SHADOW ' A FIRE HYDRANT UTILITY NOTES: ALL EXISTING OVERHEAD UTILITIES ON -SITE MUST BE PLACED UNDERGROUND. `0__wu w T W � o cj) 4 00 rn 0 C N co Z �.su- LL o T 0) 2. 0 Z Lu y- (. ® c O d' ^ •: H W Z =W% r�,, N W F_ Uj i t. i: /z_ i T, }W 'O'W d, Z° :7 =� � c t 1-0 a 7.O •WED U Z `0__wu z w T W � o cj) M%_ 00 rn 0 C N co Z �.su- LL o T 0) 2. 0 Z Lu y- (. ® c O d' ^ LU W Z =W% r�,, N W F_ Uj i t. i: /z_ i T, }W 'O'W d, Z° -0 =� � c t 1-0 a 7.O •WED U Z r 0QW W Q z O < Lu •. � 3: m 01._ . 7 C/) >+ b• tA1 Q Lu CD J co 0` N z= ~'Z W 0 LL Q_ a T 1 0 #i O w�` (V O 0) D ^, W J�J O = �_ (1) N ® VJ 70 -0 N as T C) CL x ca z w W � o � cc C=D rn 0 C N Z ZQ C7 LL o C7 a Q 2. 0 Z Lu y- (. . W F-- • no'..: O ®O:3 Z =W% r�,, �1LLcal'o,..o W F_ Uj i t. i: /z_ i T, }W 'O'W d, Z° m =� � c t 1-0 a 7.O •WED U Z r 0QW W Q z O < Lu •. � 3: m 01._ . co 5_2 0 _j o', 2 J w >+ b• tA1 Q a} C OD J cy 0` N z= ~'Z W 0 LL — > 0 = 0 QOz a°CZ O = CL UI=U uj CAD FILE HARRISON PSP REVISIONS SCALE 0 10 20 1" = 20 FEET DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: PROJ. MAN.: JOB NO. DATE: 2008 -02 -27 SHEET NO.. w U LL LL 0 z Z �O ®O:3 Z C/) u_ F�— Iu a. 1W— CC < W Q z O _ IY W cL J LL OVA LL co Lo CAD FILE HARRISON PSP REVISIONS SCALE 0 10 20 1" = 20 FEET DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: PROJ. MAN.: JOB NO. DATE: 2008 -02 -27 SHEET NO.. z Cd Cj co 0 0 0 N M v- 3 a IL 0 Co s N 3 m g c N m x r d Cn NUIL 39.0 38.0 37.0 36.0 35.0 34.0 •• '• U •Irk � J LL ��• LL 11.1 Q <O Z Z Z cc: 0 �O�^^ V J I.L. F_ w� CC Z Q L m F- Q O V Z °a !- I r_ Q w EE J - LL MMERld O 0 w !� V Z LjL _ w- , a. Lo "r- SECTION A -A HORIZ. SCALE: 1 " =20' VERT. SCALE: 1" =2' 3 WORKING DAYS BEFORE YOU DIG CALL SUNSHINE STATE ONE CALL OF FLORIDA 1- 800 -432 -4770 FOR THE LOCATION OF UNDERGROUND FACILITIES THE LOCATIONS OF EXISTING UNDERGROUND UTILITIES ARE SHOWN IN AN APPROXIMATE WAY ONLY AND HAVE NOT BEEN INDEPENDENTLY VERIFIED BY THE OWNER OR ITS REPRESENTATIVE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL DETERMINE THE EXACT LOCATION OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES BEFORE COMMENCING WORK, AND AGREES TO BE FULLY RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY AND ALL DAMAGES WHICH MIGHT BE OCCASIONED BY THE CONTRACTOR'S FAILURE TO EXACTLY LOCATE AND PRESERVE ANY AND ALL UNDERGROUND UTILITIES. 's•. CONCRETE MES INVERT ELEV. =30.09 w ' �1� M { 4 1 M _ w 33.30 33.24 0.65' CON rw�s�j �� ` ---- WALL CONC. RETAINING cP� ----------- ` -- 31.7 - �� 33.57 RETENTION POND - -- s� �c y,• . . • _ 3' ------ - - - -- °' TO BE REMOVED \ � 'Py, � �,h• �� • • •\ - 1 END a� ! y_ - - -_- 30 ' �� ____ .Qf'` -�,t 33. 4 ONKNOWN ALL CONCRETE MES 6 - 12 "PVC INVERT ELEV. =29.95 \ 1 - - - - - -- __ ••-�. \ 1 • - / - ' o r 5 4 ' -- �' CONC. RIP -RAP \ `PS -_ z-'�_- / x•22 / '` ��`'�- --- - -' -`° _`�..�'` ` { -� - / - �`I`. - ~- •• � ` - _ \ CONCRETE MES \ ---- --------- " / -E�``= �/ yon• \ENV ERT ELEV. =31.91 - \Fy _ - \ - - - - - -- - -- -- -r-- " - -- - -- - ----mot 4. .o _ Q \ l�NCE _ - ? 1 1 l ` /'' �a '' - -1e -- - _1 0 CONC. RIP -RAP \. 400 - '' D - ' _ \ � _W b� - \ CONC. BOX CULVERT ;� .% ti' ti �-•� : -' "j�- � �. _- '`v--- eRrDGE r I 1�r�•�.9 �1 _ SECTION •. - ___;.�_--- ---- -- - - -- AR INVERT ELEV. =27.87 s . I -� �' FLUSH CONC. CURB j \\ �� - - h � _ -- - - -- s� _% -IN�J. EL?3�80 "> - -1+° _____' r' �- Nv. _� �1 5 ti I 20 LF --15' RCP _ ��. �; L� -- I -- -e - - - - -- 1 _ h ��. 332 . 0t f % ��• A� 1.00° I ! �� ---- --- - - ---_ �� - - - - -- -- - -`-'= ..� ` G - • . •' ..\ - I k1 -- -- f-- -�� - - - -- 7 % \ 93 o h `w► 4i -_ II EXISTING DITCH'��"- - - - -- ----- - - - - - - �• +pr 8 "PVC -- - - -- I--- - --- -- -- ---a - "�� INV. =35.03 CONCRETE MES , • � \ I .� - -- a sb /� TOP OF BANK _ _- --- --- - - -�.r - - -- I /-._ o \ �y eaowAii "� INVERT ELEV. =31.31 a ••\` �Q/ \ \ / 3$.51 35.38 - - - - -- a / - - �60LF -6 "PVC , _ l �•_. - -_�:� lb \ \ ''�� . - UNDERDRANV� �- ��' „�„� e�_�L� _y '�, '�, �• - - - - -- \ \ ® Qs \ TYPE CURB FLUS NC. -3a- - - - - -- -- - F -- ? i pR6POSED DRAINAG ;� ----- -y_.._ "�-•_ ti� 35.59 CUR¢' LONG v i -� EASEM `\ \- - - -ti INV. 00 ' °>z - -- y� FG ` i = �. - \ R{ET. WALL DRIP -'� LINE 6' HIGH FENCE \ / C/ CONTROL STRUCTURE B' ON TOP OF RET. STORM\ WATER • MOD. TYPE C INLET WALL �k, PO NDJE / I tiA �•\ Q - �/h i o \ . 1 _ \ s GRATE EL. =34.52 DHWL -34.52 J ° `• ` I'� INV. EL. =31.90 D RETAINING WALL /�/ \3/ d�' / 1 `� EXISTING DRIVEWAY ( ) = �� \ - C.B. RETAINING HIGH) INV EL. 6' E - 32.0 m TOP =35.15 \ � q � �ye�' � \ (APPROX 1.5' HIGH APRON TO BE Q ` O TOJ� OF SKIMMER =35.02 - 9 SOT OF SKIMMER = 34.02 REM�D(ED AND THEN ° �O \A o\ 2ss. D SODDED FLUSH CONC. o� \ i / \ ` o / �` p �, TYPED UR \ -__ - - - -- TYPE D CURB CURB ALONG DRIP • `� aer y�° RET. WALL LINE APPROXIMATE STORM INLET ` . \ X ,? 18 HIGH BACK SIDE\OF GRATE ELEV. =34.58 `,STA ED SIL CE \• CURB ADJACECENT ICT N.INV. =32.02 (18-RCP) �y -^\_ THE SAVED TREES S.INV. =32.08 (18 "RCP) sc^ A F•. w 1 I,y.1� �lb i/ `•uoo.� I 96 LF --15' RCP 1 @ 0.50% !'� STAKEU$ILT C Ar of 0 1 \ / \ ya ti / ! 1ti \ sa• �9 e� /.ALL s w. 1a FENCE Y / a B � w \ - - - MOD. YPg \ �COfyTOL S YRUCTURE'A� LINE E /C INLET ` \ ° (b GRATE EL. =37.93 •� \ �� ``1` < � \ ;ZEPS9` 5�' �- w �' INV. F,L/. =35.50 INV EL. (6 ") = 35.00 o� ••� . \ \ O� �\``� " 36 s `b� -.ems „ - - -TOP OF SKIMMER = 38.43 O BOTTOM F a6 ��1N�7$. 36 : R•°NP- e, 1 SKIMMER = 37.43 °' O ` ks' X. e 0/0 12LF -6 "PVC I s aQ 9��'' O• fl , ?�• YS '� UNDERDRAIN EXISTING CONC. EXISTING STEPS RAMP TO BE T MW T R 11 SEpSt�� GR�E TO BE REMOVED REMOVED I '� ee�Y w_ ' - SRO �•"�- S ALL ROOF - -� �; DRIP RU \ PROPOSED DRIVEWAY ./' - - \ ri I DI APRON TO MEET 37.0 • / 6' HIGH CHAIN U FE 36.0 3 P 35.0 34.0 RETAINING W DESIGNED BY OTH 33.0 32.0 31.0 30 0 CURRENT CITY OF CLEARWATER CODES )PERTY \� I. '• & ENO \N�. ca EXISTING DRIVEWAY 9FyT o �. \ •\ ` 1 ° j / \ APRON TO BE �� °� \� \\ y�° I ! Q. "�� _ �'j••. REMOVED AND THEN .\SODDED TOP OF BANK \ s� �• \ \ \ �°a (DITCH) �� Q, ` / ,yQ. // 6.r• / 40.31 Ia1. STORM INLET 3a• 39 GRATE ELEV. =36.65 - -� / 40.26 41 g NOTE: N.INV. =34.22 (18-RCP) ti EXISTING STAIRS TO BE REMOVED \ S.INV. =34.37 (18-RCP) ALL POND ;mss ao 15 CONCRETE INLET AREA TO S.INV. =38.46 (4" CLAY) SODDED BE \ \ "> ° yLO S. SLOT ELEV. = 39.48 \�\G ��\ W.INV. =38.67 (12" PVC) PPR 'Cs �al \ PSQNP�t �1 °� s ' �A SECTION B -B HORIZ. SCALE: 1 " =20' \ �� ti 40.27 VERT. SCALE: 1 " =2' 02\ U �ll� J LL LL 11.1 Q <O Z Z Z cc: 0 �O�^^ V J I.L. F_ w� CC Z Q L m F- Q O V Z °a !- I r_ Q w EE J - LL O 0 w !� V Z LjL Q a. Lo "r- 1 1 Vii:. . • �� --m��-- CURRENT CITY OF CLEARWATER CODES )PERTY \� I. '• & ENO \N�. ca EXISTING DRIVEWAY 9FyT o �. \ •\ ` 1 ° j / \ APRON TO BE �� °� \� \\ y�° I ! Q. "�� _ �'j••. REMOVED AND THEN .\SODDED TOP OF BANK \ s� �• \ \ \ �°a (DITCH) �� Q, ` / ,yQ. // 6.r• / 40.31 Ia1. STORM INLET 3a• 39 GRATE ELEV. =36.65 - -� / 40.26 41 g NOTE: N.INV. =34.22 (18-RCP) ti EXISTING STAIRS TO BE REMOVED \ S.INV. =34.37 (18-RCP) ALL POND ;mss ao 15 CONCRETE INLET AREA TO S.INV. =38.46 (4" CLAY) SODDED BE \ \ "> ° yLO S. SLOT ELEV. = 39.48 \�\G ��\ W.INV. =38.67 (12" PVC) PPR 'Cs �al \ PSQNP�t �1 °� s ' �A SECTION B -B HORIZ. SCALE: 1 " =20' \ �� ti 40.27 VERT. SCALE: 1 " =2' 02\ 69 �•� NOFF TO BE \ LINE I RECTED TO � I � • \. POND A' DRIP LINE \7 / p• 39 WEST I-ACE OF k`1• WALT! 3.12' E. 1 � 0 /� 2 �°j i ao, 40_ 11�) UTILITY NOTES: ALL EXISTING OVERHEAD UTILITIES ON -SITE MUST BE PLACED UNDERGROUND. U �ll� J LL LL 69 �•� NOFF TO BE \ LINE I RECTED TO � I � • \. POND A' DRIP LINE \7 / p• 39 WEST I-ACE OF k`1• WALT! 3.12' E. 1 � 0 /� 2 �°j i ao, 40_ 11�) UTILITY NOTES: ALL EXISTING OVERHEAD UTILITIES ON -SITE MUST BE PLACED UNDERGROUND. Benchmark: CLEARWATER BENCHMARK B -06 EL. = 53.14' N.G.V.D., ADJUSTED TO EL. = 52.26' N.A.V.D. M.S.L. = 0.00' T Co N a) wJ O C- 11- d7 W -0 C\l - Co .� 2 Lu � Cn It T C 1 > O Cn N ®0 � -0 -0 C O T .0 TCO z F- rn 0 oC Z za o CC o W pr J Cvl m rn W !_•• J �� p O Z 01 E �;• 7- f U. o� `o w W' "o w m d C •p V w a,n�, m Q w j" o m a my " 0 -1 =QOM NZ0 F-Z w �pLL '> it C) W aa.z = O¢0 W Q U J LL LL 11.1 Q <O Z Z Z cc: 0 �O�^^ V J I.L. F_ w� CC Z Q L m F- Q O V Benchmark: CLEARWATER BENCHMARK B -06 EL. = 53.14' N.G.V.D., ADJUSTED TO EL. = 52.26' N.A.V.D. M.S.L. = 0.00' T Co N a) wJ O C- 11- d7 W -0 C\l - Co .� 2 Lu � Cn It T C 1 > O Cn N ®0 � -0 -0 C O T .0 TCO z F- rn 0 oC Z za o CC o W pr J Cvl m rn W !_•• J �� p O Z 01 E �;• 7- f U. o� `o w W' "o w m d C •p V w a,n�, m Q w j" o m a my " 0 -1 =QOM NZ0 F-Z w �pLL '> it C) W aa.z = O¢0 W Q U J LL LL 11.1 Q <O Z Z Z cc: 0 �O�^^ V J I.L. F_ Z CC Z Q Cc F- Q O V Z °a !- I r_ Q w EE J - LL O 0 w !� V Z LjL Q a. Lo "r- CAD FILE HARRISON PSP REVISIONS SCALE 0 10 20 1" = 20 FEET DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: PROJ. MAN.: JOB NO. DATE: 2008 -02 -27 SHEET NO. C=A. LANDSCAPE NOTES: 1. PROPOSED SHRUBS WITHIN A VISIBILITY TRIANGLE MUST BE MAINTAINED TO A _ MAXIMUM HEIGHT OF 30 INCHES. IRRIGATION NOTES: I . AUTOMATIC PERMANENT IRRIGATION SYSTEM PROVIDING COMPLETE WATER COVERAGE FOR ALL REQUIRED AND OTHER LANDSCAPING MATERIALS SHALL BE PROVIDED AND MAINTAINED AS A FULLY FUNCTIONING SYSTEM IN ORDER TO PRESERVE THE LANDSCAPING IN A HEALTHY GROWING CONDITION. 2. ALL IRRIGATION SYSTEMS CONNECTED TO THE PUBLIC POTABLE WATER SUPPLY 5Y5TEM SHALL INCLUDE A BACKFLOW PREVENTER AT THE SERVICE CONNECTION. 3. ALL IRRIGATION 5Y5TEM5 SHALL BE INSTALLED 50 AS TO MINIMIZE SPRAY UPON ANY IMPERVIOUS SURFACE, SUCH AS SIDEWALKS AND PAVED AREAS. 4° ALL IRRIGATION 5Y5TEM5 SHALL INCLUDE A RAIN 5EN5OR/SHUT OFF DEVICE TO AVOID IRRIGATION DURING PERIODS OF SUFFICIENT RAINFALL. 5. UNDERGROUND IRRIGATION SHALL NOT BE INSTALLED WITHIN THE DRIPLINE5 OF EXISTING TREES UNLESS ROOT PROTECTION MEASURES ARE PROVIDED. G. IF AVAILABLE, RECLAIMED WATER SHALL BE USED FOR IRRIGATION PURPOSES. INTERIOR LANDSCAPE AREA CALCULATION 10% OF THE VU. A. V.U.A = 14,G98 " 0. 10 = 1,470 5,R PROVIDED: 1,488 5,1=. TREE fiREMOVAL LIST OAKS: 24", 27", 18", 14", 14 (TOTAL 97 „ REPLACEMENTS) PALMS: 13 ", 12", 12 ", 13 ", 10" (TOTAL OF 5" REPLACEMENTS) EXISTING TREES TO BE SAVED OAK (190” TOTAL) 42 ", 30, 22 ", 20 ", 12", 1 1 ", 1011, 1 O" CAMPHOR (17" TOTAL) 911,811 PALM (219" TOTAL) 12", 12", 1 1 ", 12", 1 1 ", 10 ", 1011, 511, G ", 911, 811, 1411, G ", 1211, 15", 15 ", 18 ", IQ" SYMBOL zz PROPOSED PLANT LEGEND QTY. COMMON NAME BOTANANICAL NAME Shade tree I G 1% Oak, live Quercus virginiana (QV) Accent tree CONC. BOX CULVERT INVERT ELEV. =27.87 CONCRETE MES INVERT ELEV. =31.31 SPECIFICATION 2.5" Caliper, 10 FT height x 5 -G' Spread, 30 gal. 10 Crape Myrtle Lagerstroemia indica (LI) 2" Caliper, 8 FT height x 5 -G' Spread, 30 gal. Shnibs Q 2G5 "AA Walter viburnum Viburnum obovatum (VO) 18" -24" height, 24" min. spread, 3G" o /c, 3 gal. 45 Dwarf Yaupon Holly Ilex vomitoria (IV) 18 " -24" height, 24" min. spread, 30 o1c, 3 gal. Ground cover 334 X15 Parson's Juniper Juniperus parsonii (JP) �-- Botanincal Name Abbreviation VO 23 — entity Existing Tree Legend o Oak ti U I CamPhor �oe Palm ti o Tree to be removed 3 WORKING DAYS BEFORE YOU DIG CALL SUNSHINE STATE ONE CALL OF FLORIDA 1 -800- 432 -4770 FOR THE LOCATION OF UNDERGROUND FACILITIES THE LOCATIONS OF EXISTING UNDERGROUND UTILITIES ARE SHOWN IN AN APPROXIMATE WAY ONLY AND HAVE NOT BEEN INDEPENDENTLY VERIFIED BY THE OWNER OR ITS REPRESENTATIVE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL DETERMINE THE EXACT LOCATION OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES BEFORE COMMENCING WORK, AND AGREES TO BE FULLY RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY AND ALL DAMAGES WHICH MIGHT BE OCCASIONED BY THE CONTRACTOR'S FAILURE TO EXACTLY LOCATE AND PRESERVE ANY AND ALL UNDERGROUND UTILITIES. 24" o /c, I gal. CONCRETE MES INVERT ELEV. =30.09 0.65' CON WALL AWING RETENTION POND I `•. —�h0. EXISTING WOOD BRIDGE dV E ?o ��g • • • ' �► . • ..... 0c TO BE REMOVED END �� 2 - - / •'"'�> 1 •00 �Z _ _ NN N WALL CONCRETE MES t �� • • • f OWN INVERT ELEV. =29.95 12 "PVC •. i �o°. r + ++ r +_+ \� _ / ll�jV _= �2 / �'•'• -• 'S`'� \' \ 100 •`L0 V`O'm'r +r S \ i \I +'t\'L+ oe \ �. •yam... ��•• -- r +r+ 1c. i/ \ CONCRETE MES rrl�y�; I • �gyrr '♦ / O\, \INVERT ELEV. =31.91 \\ .• / ryQ. _ \ _ \/ /BRIDGEFOOT QV } I + .c it 1 '-1_ l + 1b —1�` +•c 60. \\ ' \ \ \`• / - � 1 1 _ 1 3O 1, 0•+ yY + +r + + + + ++ � __ / ' � • lei -= = '•sN•V =33 2 p,0�. 1., P •\ �3i PERIMETER BUFFER + '` �r �•/ �� \ I' °34 93 °y I �_ "0` �_•'•�., r INV. =35.03 °\ \ VCS / kNON- RESIDENTIAL I +_ _+ eAOw'+ 6"PVc �• 16 / i' ADJACENT USE) ! 'T — .r +�T +_r �L rrr`r +--- - - - - -- •. • : rr •I ' \ �'. \` - -' `° / -- 7 Act. \ � / / \ 4 \ TREE BARRICADE DRIP '- LINE \ / �\ (TYPICAL) STO WATER IV PONDJB .N C.B. RETAINING WALL \ VO (APPROX 1.5' HIGH) QV IV I \\ 5 g VO \\ ` IV / \ / \ \ VO LI 5 JP _ 27 till V3 5 LINE STORM INLET � <F , IV / /! � •�/`/111111 \ \\ WAN� GRATE ELEV. =34.58 3000 %o i I ' SYSTEM N N.INV. =32.02 (18 "RCP) 7 JP sS.INV. =32.08 (18 "RCP) (TYPICAL) till 0 41 4 I i TRIANGLE Jp .. 39 I L1 I EA/ \ FAC OF 52 QV \ \11 WALL 14. 5 W. 5 1 I o \ I Y Y 1 PERIMET _ER BUFF R ,111 (NON — RESIDENTI(IlL 1 •�° / l TREE TC) BE VO ADJACENT UqE) 1 / ' I \�N REMOVED \ \ 8 I \ / LI (TYPICAL) \ QV JP \ \ ° �� O 11111 \\ a PERIMETER BUFFER DRIP�I JP gM! a 99 / (COLLECTOR R/W LINE \ LI 66 �o �a C�C� Lllpl! a LI \ / IV ADJACENT USE) JP \\ 2 3 \ / c' 7 31 \\ �\ a, a GANG O j� "'' • g, MT VO VO Ilf // J\\1L11 �� N l�$. • Y • / /lllu \\ oR{4�•• . _ a^ !/ 30 s . — VO • -- C� 3 oil VO 1111k1� �/ d 18 EXISTING CONCS�/ •• +•I \\ • g6 :7 6 EXISTING STEPS RAMP TO BE T M ` 44 gyp! a TO BE REMOVED REMOVED • P05 _.. 1?�� VO o - - DRIP w- LINE IV 7 \NG / 5 O M RG 8 \� C M 3993 DRIP-\ \ PSO`v � OF, �\-• LINE \. I _ O S�OR( MF \N \SN F� #�5�3 WEST FACE OF ati WALT! 3.12' E. Op1C iw J/ •' r \ IV °rn PERIMETER BUFFER \ �yT \` \\ \ 15 / : i . • • \ woo (NON- RESIDENTIAL Y, . _ ADJACENT USE) ro _r� e "\ Vin° yeii _�•(' - j _' 45 STORM INLET GRATE ELEV. =36.65 \ / r CCM�PePRF\ OOR N.INV. =34.22 (18-RCP) 2 EXISTING STAIRS TO BE REMOVED \SN F\N S.INV. =34.37 (is"RCP) CONCRETE INLET '- S.INV. =38.46 (4" CLAY) S. W.INV.O 38.67 (12" PVC) QPR`�\NG 0\ PSQ�P�Z LAND ALTERATION/TREE PRESERVATION NOTES CAD FILE REQUIRED TREE BARRICADES AND EROSION CONTROL MEASURES MUST REMAIN INTACT THROUGHOUT HARRISON PSP CONSTRUCTION. DURING LAND ALTERATION AND CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES IT SHALL BE UNLAWFUL TO REMOVE VEGETATION BY GRUBBING OR TO PLACE SOIL DEPOSITS, DEBRIS, SOLVENTS, CONSTRUCTION MATERIAL, MACHINERY OR OTHER EQUIPMENT OF ANY KIND WITHIN THE DRIPLINE OF A TREE TO REMAIN ON THE 51TE UNLESS OTHERWISE APPROVED BY COUNTY. ALL TRIMMING ON A TREE PROTECTED BY THE PROVISIONS OF THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE AMERICAN NATIONAL STANDARDS INSTITUTE (ANSI) A -300 PRUNING STANDARDS. GENERAL LANDSCAPING NOTES 2� � REVISIONS r �'J J �=�) SCALE 0 10 20 1 . All plant materials to be Florida Grade-# I or better quality, installed to highest nursery standards. =::s 2. Mulch to be RECYCLED WOOD MULCH. Mulch shall be installed to a minimum of 3" thick in all planting areas. s:; 1" = 20 FEET 3. Mulch material and /or drought tolerant ground cover or shrubs must be used in landscape areas. DRAWN BY: 4. Sod to be 95% weed free: ARGENTINE -BAHIA 5. Sod to be Installed with tight Joints, rolled and fertilized at time of installation. All areas of the project site disturbed during construction shall be sodded unless CHECKED BY: specifically labeled otherwise. All areas within the project limits shall be provided with sod or other specified groundcover. PROJ• MAN,: G. All dimensions to be field- checked by the Landscape Contractor prior to construction, with any discrepancies reported immediately to the Engineer. 7. All permits necessary are to be provided by the installing contractor unless otherwise specifically stated in the specifications. JOB No. 8. Carefully review the Landscape Specifications. The installing Contractor will be held responsible for all items contained there. DATE: 2008 -02 -27 9. Required tree barricades and erosion control measures must remain intact throughout construction. SHEET NO. C° W U T U. /A � M M W a 0 z Z Z O U �C: 0 LL V T J ® d- LU W LU I— OU 0 3� 0 Z U ir _W E —•� CC W �'j- 0UW U_ Ict LU CID Q T ma O 0 > U) N N 0 _ W %%.000 70 W C M O Ca T CL T z H H O C J z z° o cis CC f ° `r o 2 CC X � N m O w h w z�iz " n PR m E m: Z p'' EEC.) ui-. _ w Ca B) ¢ ° w w LLi m W k a U m >Lz LI U p�Z w -rnm 'rn'm N vl r m �< 1�4 (> i >om� � 2 U rn � Ewa 1,: / = m r ao =¢ m > c N O ~ z rn w oo= _> Op z «t aCC z a O = U fu- OZ LAND ALTERATION/TREE PRESERVATION NOTES CAD FILE REQUIRED TREE BARRICADES AND EROSION CONTROL MEASURES MUST REMAIN INTACT THROUGHOUT HARRISON PSP CONSTRUCTION. DURING LAND ALTERATION AND CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES IT SHALL BE UNLAWFUL TO REMOVE VEGETATION BY GRUBBING OR TO PLACE SOIL DEPOSITS, DEBRIS, SOLVENTS, CONSTRUCTION MATERIAL, MACHINERY OR OTHER EQUIPMENT OF ANY KIND WITHIN THE DRIPLINE OF A TREE TO REMAIN ON THE 51TE UNLESS OTHERWISE APPROVED BY COUNTY. ALL TRIMMING ON A TREE PROTECTED BY THE PROVISIONS OF THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE AMERICAN NATIONAL STANDARDS INSTITUTE (ANSI) A -300 PRUNING STANDARDS. GENERAL LANDSCAPING NOTES 2� � REVISIONS r �'J J �=�) SCALE 0 10 20 1 . All plant materials to be Florida Grade-# I or better quality, installed to highest nursery standards. =::s 2. Mulch to be RECYCLED WOOD MULCH. Mulch shall be installed to a minimum of 3" thick in all planting areas. s:; 1" = 20 FEET 3. Mulch material and /or drought tolerant ground cover or shrubs must be used in landscape areas. DRAWN BY: 4. Sod to be 95% weed free: ARGENTINE -BAHIA 5. Sod to be Installed with tight Joints, rolled and fertilized at time of installation. All areas of the project site disturbed during construction shall be sodded unless CHECKED BY: specifically labeled otherwise. All areas within the project limits shall be provided with sod or other specified groundcover. PROJ• MAN,: G. All dimensions to be field- checked by the Landscape Contractor prior to construction, with any discrepancies reported immediately to the Engineer. 7. All permits necessary are to be provided by the installing contractor unless otherwise specifically stated in the specifications. JOB No. 8. Carefully review the Landscape Specifications. The installing Contractor will be held responsible for all items contained there. DATE: 2008 -02 -27 9. Required tree barricades and erosion control measures must remain intact throughout construction. SHEET NO. C° W U U. LL 0 z Z Z O U LL Q �Wz U I— OU 0 3� 0 Z F- ir _W E —•� CC W �'j- 0UW U_ LO IT— LAND ALTERATION/TREE PRESERVATION NOTES CAD FILE REQUIRED TREE BARRICADES AND EROSION CONTROL MEASURES MUST REMAIN INTACT THROUGHOUT HARRISON PSP CONSTRUCTION. DURING LAND ALTERATION AND CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES IT SHALL BE UNLAWFUL TO REMOVE VEGETATION BY GRUBBING OR TO PLACE SOIL DEPOSITS, DEBRIS, SOLVENTS, CONSTRUCTION MATERIAL, MACHINERY OR OTHER EQUIPMENT OF ANY KIND WITHIN THE DRIPLINE OF A TREE TO REMAIN ON THE 51TE UNLESS OTHERWISE APPROVED BY COUNTY. ALL TRIMMING ON A TREE PROTECTED BY THE PROVISIONS OF THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE AMERICAN NATIONAL STANDARDS INSTITUTE (ANSI) A -300 PRUNING STANDARDS. GENERAL LANDSCAPING NOTES 2� � REVISIONS r �'J J �=�) SCALE 0 10 20 1 . All plant materials to be Florida Grade-# I or better quality, installed to highest nursery standards. =::s 2. Mulch to be RECYCLED WOOD MULCH. Mulch shall be installed to a minimum of 3" thick in all planting areas. s:; 1" = 20 FEET 3. Mulch material and /or drought tolerant ground cover or shrubs must be used in landscape areas. DRAWN BY: 4. Sod to be 95% weed free: ARGENTINE -BAHIA 5. Sod to be Installed with tight Joints, rolled and fertilized at time of installation. All areas of the project site disturbed during construction shall be sodded unless CHECKED BY: specifically labeled otherwise. All areas within the project limits shall be provided with sod or other specified groundcover. PROJ• MAN,: G. All dimensions to be field- checked by the Landscape Contractor prior to construction, with any discrepancies reported immediately to the Engineer. 7. All permits necessary are to be provided by the installing contractor unless otherwise specifically stated in the specifications. JOB No. 8. Carefully review the Landscape Specifications. The installing Contractor will be held responsible for all items contained there. DATE: 2008 -02 -27 9. Required tree barricades and erosion control measures must remain intact throughout construction. SHEET NO. C° NOTES: 1.) WALLS a.) New construction: maximum 6' -0' high and constructed of concrete block (8 "x8 "x16 "). Materials used should be consistent with those used in the construction of and architectural style of the principal building. (Section 3 -802 Materials) b.) Existing: maximum 6' -0' high replacement materials can be made of the some materials as long as they are made of approved opaque material. 2.) FOOTINGS 8 "x16" concrete w /2- #5 continuous rebar imbedded. 3.) CONCRETE SLAB Monolithic, min. 6' thickness w /imbedded 6 "x6 "/ 10x10 welded wire fabric (W.W.F.), 3000 P.S.I. with fiber mesh reinforcing. 4.) CONCRETE FILLED CELLS With 1 - #5 vertical rebar tied to footer steel at each corner and every 4' O.C. 5.) GATES Constructed of min. 1 -1/2" diameter galvanized tubular steel w /privacy -type slats inserted in galvanized steel mesh fabric, hinge- mounted on min. 3" diameter galvanized steel post. (Gates and post constructed and installed per applicable building code by licensed fence contractor). 6.) DROP PIN 1/2" dia. 18" long metal rod gate latch. Provide 3/4" dia. hole 6" into concrete for rods. In asphalt provide a 3/4" P.V.C. sleeve, 6" long, or equal. 7.) SOIL Soil bearing capacity to be at least 2,500 P.S.F. 8.) BOLLARD 3' -6" high, 6" diameter steel pipe bollard filled with concrete, painted traffic yellow, imbedded 3' -0" deep in 18" concrete foundation. (See Detail) CONCRETE MASONRY WALL CONSTRUCTION >- Materials, construction and quantity control of masonry shall be in accordance Q with Uniform Building Code (UBC), Chapter 24. General conditions and EX. Sidewalk W U construction requirements shall be applied as specified in UBC, Section 2404 (f), during grouted masonry work. 1:12 Max 1: 50 0 1. All reinforcing steel shall be deformed bars conforming to ASTM A -615, max Grade 60. Vertical reinforcement shall be placed in the center of the masonry cell, and shall be held in position at the top and bottom. ='' O :..: ".: . 2. If a slab dowel does not line -up with a vertical core, it shall not be sloped Q more than one horizontal in six verticals (1:6). Proposed � Sidewalk Access Width Varies 3. Horizontal wall reinforcement shall be standard truss type DUR -O -WALL (or THICKNESS (INCHES) Ex. Curb tY o a U equivalent) at 16' D.C.. Heavy Duty Proposed 0 U- Type S-1 or S-3 Asphaltic Concrete with minimum BUS Stop Pad W 2 4. Hollow Load- bearing Concrete Masonry Units shall be normal weight 0 0 4' Min Residential Street • conforming to ASTM C -90, with a minimum compressive strength of 1,900 is _ -U: »_ W t°_ PSI. Limerock having a minimum LBR of 100 and SECTION "A -A" 8 compacted to at least 98 percent of its modified Proctor U REV. DATE DESCRIPTION APP, maximum dry density (ASTM D- 1557). Uthe bottom 5. Mortar shall be type M or S, in accordance with ASTM C -270. Place all swing gate (typ.) of the base will be within 18 inches of the seasonal masonry in running bond with 3/8" mortar joints. Provide complete coverage high groundwater level, then a moisture tolerant base N.T.S. U) 12" Textured Surface face shell mortar bedding, horizontal and vertical. PARKING BY U) 6" dia. Steel bollards BLACK BORDER Back of Curb 3000 psi conc 4" thick. Constr. 6" O 6 6. Coarse grout shall conform to ASTM C -476, with a maximum aggregate size at least 95 percent of the modified Proctor maximum conc. Filled (typ) PERMIT of 3/8 ", 8" to 10" slump, and a minimum compressive strength of 2,500 PSI at - C) re uired i a moisture - tolerant base is used 28 days. 0 - j 7. Minimum 3" X 3" clean -out holes (saw -cut) are required at the bottom course NOTES: exceeding 8 by use of tamp or roller in conformance with 9 1 - #5 at 4' center of all cells to verify grout placement. Clean -outs sholl be sealed after 1. Bus Stop Pad may extend from existing curb to or through masonry inspection - provided in accordance with ACI 531 -4.6, and before WHITE CKGROUND the alignment of existing sidewalk. grouting. drop pin 8. Prior to grouting, the grout space shall be clean, with no mortar projections 2. The Bus Stop Pad will follow the some slope and will be greater the % ", mortar droppings or other foreign material. All cells shall be in flush with the back of curb. vertical alignment, and shall solidly be filled with coarse grout as specified. 3. The maximum slope across the long dimension of the Bus Stop 9. During placing, grout shall be consolidated with flexible Cable vibrator. First Fn Pad (perpendicular to the curb) must be a maximum of 1:50. grout pour shall be stopped a minimum of 1 - 1/2" below the top of the 0 When field conditions do not allow a 1:50 slope, the minimum feasible middle bond beam masonry. 1 slope shall be provided, not to exceed 1:12. 4. Paved access to the Bus Stop Pad from the sidewalk Grade must meet City of Clearwater sidewalk standards and ADA clearance min. standards with a maximum slope of 1:12 and level rest 14" stops no more than 30 feet apart. Location of access will be field determined. Slope of parkway area adjacent to O O Bus Stop Pad will be field determined. F 6" Z3000 CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA swing gate (typ.) 8" PUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATION 5. Bus Stop Pad shall be a minimum of 6" reinforced concrete the ENGINEERING Min. same as concrete driveways. 2 08/16/04 Rev. Notes B.V.D. DRAWN BY fiber mesh reinforcing - DATE 6/01 t 4/9/02 Rev. Notes R.G. CHECKED BY DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE INDEX NO. 6. Bus Stop Pad shall be centered as close to lot lines as possible. 6 10x10 W.W.F. NOTES PLAN Existing bus stop signs may need to be relocated accordingly. DESIGNED BY REV. DATE DESCRIPTION APP. T.G. 3 OF 3 NOTES: HEAVY DUTY PAVEMENT TO BE USED FOR ALL PAVEMENT IN THE PUBLIC RIGHT -OF -WAY. CONTRACTOR TO REFER TO THE GEOTECHNICAL REPORT. 3 WORKING DAYS BEFORE YOU DIG CALL SUNSHINE STATE ONE CALL OF FLORIDA " 1- 800 - 432 -4770 FOR THE LOCATION OF UNDERGROUND FACILITIES THE LOCATIONS OF EXISTING UNDERGROUND UTILITIES ARE SHOWN IN AN APPROXIMATE WAY ONLY AND HAVE NOT BEEN INDEPENDENTLY VERIFIED BY THE OWNER OR ITS REPRESENTATIVE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL DETERMINE THE EXACT LOCATION OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES BEFORE COMMENCING WORK, AND AGREES TO BE FULLY RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY AND ALL DAMAGES WHICH MIGHT BE OCCASIONED BY THE CONTRACTOR'S FAILURE TO EXACTLY LOCATE AND PRESERVE ANY AND ALL UNDERGROUND UTILITIES. CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA PUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATION ENGINEERING DATE 2 8/16/04 Rev. Notes B.V.D. DRAWN BY 6 /Ot 1 4/9/02 Rev. Notes R.G. CHECKED BY DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE INDEX NO. D.M. SINGLE 701 REV. DATE DESCRIPTION APP. DESIGNED BY 1 OF 3 T.G. FACE COURSE BASE COURSE J SUBBASE THICKNESS (INCHES) 14' -8" o a U ' ht Duty Heavy Duty Surface Coarse U- Type S-1 or S-3 Asphaltic Concrete with minimum 1.5 2 Tie beam with 0 0 4' Min Residential Street • Remove Back of Curb on State or Vertical Curbs with a vertical is _ -U: »_ Base Course t°_ 1 - #5 rebar continuous Limerock having a minimum LBR of 100 and 6 8 compacted to at least 98 percent of its modified Proctor U REV. DATE DESCRIPTION APP, maximum dry density (ASTM D- 1557). Uthe bottom 12' swing gate (typ.) of the base will be within 18 inches of the seasonal �--- -- high groundwater level, then a moisture tolerant base rn 12" Textured Surface clearance min. PARKING BY 6" dia. Steel bollards BLACK BORDER Back of Curb 3000 psi conc 4" thick. Constr. 6" Stabilized to a minimum LBR of 40 and compacted to 6 6 at least 95 percent of the modified Proctor maximum conc. Filled (typ) PERMIT dry density (ASTM D- 1557). Stabilization may not be - WHITE BACKGROUND re uired i a moisture - tolerant base is used 10' -8" 0 - j Ramps shall have a tactile surface, textured to a depth not P lace expansion ansion joints' at driveways. exceeding 8 by use of tamp or roller in conformance with 9 1 - #5 at 4' center & LETTERS o F.S. 318.18 a WHITE CKGROUND 6' drop pin ALL LETTERS T 1" SERIES "C" Fn 48" Max 12' Grade Grade clearance min. 14" 1 O O F 6" Z3000 swing gate (typ.) 8" 4 ' P .s.i. concrete slab with Min. 8 "x 16" concrete footing fiber mesh reinforcing - w/ 2- #5 rebar (typ.) monolithic, min 6 thickness, "x6 "/ 6 10x10 W.W.F. PLAN N.T.S. drop pin hole ELEVATION (typ.) N.T.S. NOTES: HEAVY DUTY PAVEMENT TO BE USED FOR ALL PAVEMENT IN THE PUBLIC RIGHT -OF -WAY. CONTRACTOR TO REFER TO THE GEOTECHNICAL REPORT. 3 WORKING DAYS BEFORE YOU DIG CALL SUNSHINE STATE ONE CALL OF FLORIDA " 1- 800 - 432 -4770 FOR THE LOCATION OF UNDERGROUND FACILITIES THE LOCATIONS OF EXISTING UNDERGROUND UTILITIES ARE SHOWN IN AN APPROXIMATE WAY ONLY AND HAVE NOT BEEN INDEPENDENTLY VERIFIED BY THE OWNER OR ITS REPRESENTATIVE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL DETERMINE THE EXACT LOCATION OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES BEFORE COMMENCING WORK, AND AGREES TO BE FULLY RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY AND ALL DAMAGES WHICH MIGHT BE OCCASIONED BY THE CONTRACTOR'S FAILURE TO EXACTLY LOCATE AND PRESERVE ANY AND ALL UNDERGROUND UTILITIES. CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA PUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATION ENGINEERING DATE 2 8/16/04 Rev. Notes B.V.D. DRAWN BY 6 /Ot 1 4/9/02 Rev. Notes R.G. CHECKED BY DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE INDEX NO. D.M. SINGLE 701 REV. DATE DESCRIPTION APP. DESIGNED BY 1 OF 3 T.G. FACE COURSE BASE COURSE J SUBBASE TYPICAL DRIVE SECTION NOT TO SCALE i d) o c 3 s R/W Typical (D +- o -0 �_ J R/W Typical v to 1.0' Typical t Alternate 1 :12 Max. Access Routes--r Slope 4.0' Wide Min. 1:12 Max. Slope �' :;9 : •; Bus Stop Pad -Curb Bus Stop Sign 50' Min. BUS STOP PAD N.T.S. CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA PUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATION ENGINEERING REDRAWN BY DATE TYPICAL BUS STOP 2 ss 1� 04/01 NOTE 3 RFN CHECKED W.J.S. BY IND 09N0 PAD DETAIL REV. DATE DESCRIPTION App_ DESIGNED BY 3 T.C.J- OF 3 HANDICAPPED SIGNS -SEE INDEX N0. 119 CONC. WALK RAMP DOWN RAMP DOWN CONIC. WALK SEE INDEX NO. 109 SEE INDEX NO. 109 6" TRAFFIC WHITE i S7R iq 6" S TROKE; 7 i.? p (TYPICAL) ID i•4 I r 6'p• �,; it' 5' -0. 2" (TYPICAL) 29' -0" HANDICAPPED STALL DETAIL NOTE: All pavement markings to be thermoplastic. THICKNESS (INCHES) SECTION DESCRIPTION o a U ' ht Duty Heavy Duty Surface Coarse U- Type S-1 or S-3 Asphaltic Concrete with minimum 1.5 2 Marshall stability of 1500 lbs. compacted to at least 95 0 0 4' Min Residential Street percent of the maximum laboratory Marshall density. Remove Back of Curb on State or Vertical Curbs with a vertical is _ -U: »_ Base Course t°_ BLUE BACKGROUND Limerock having a minimum LBR of 100 and 6 8 compacted to at least 98 percent of its modified Proctor 1 of 1 REV. DATE DESCRIPTION APP, maximum dry density (ASTM D- 1557). Uthe bottom CONC. join exist back of curb of the base will be within 18 inches of the seasonal �--- -- high groundwater level, then a moisture tolerant base rn 12" Textured Surface will be required, or underdrains must be installed PARKING BY Subbase BLACK BORDER Back of Curb 3000 psi conc 4" thick. Constr. 6" Stabilized to a minimum LBR of 40 and compacted to 6 6 at least 95 percent of the modified Proctor maximum 6" 6" Vertical Curb PERMIT dry density (ASTM D- 1557). Stabilization may not be - WHITE BACKGROUND re uired i a moisture - tolerant base is used ONLY NOTES: TYPICAL DRIVE SECTION NOT TO SCALE i d) o c 3 s R/W Typical (D +- o -0 �_ J R/W Typical v to 1.0' Typical t Alternate 1 :12 Max. Access Routes--r Slope 4.0' Wide Min. 1:12 Max. Slope �' :;9 : •; Bus Stop Pad -Curb Bus Stop Sign 50' Min. BUS STOP PAD N.T.S. CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA PUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATION ENGINEERING REDRAWN BY DATE TYPICAL BUS STOP 2 ss 1� 04/01 NOTE 3 RFN CHECKED W.J.S. BY IND 09N0 PAD DETAIL REV. DATE DESCRIPTION App_ DESIGNED BY 3 T.C.J- OF 3 HANDICAPPED SIGNS -SEE INDEX N0. 119 CONC. WALK RAMP DOWN RAMP DOWN CONIC. WALK SEE INDEX NO. 109 SEE INDEX NO. 109 6" TRAFFIC WHITE i S7R iq 6" S TROKE; 7 i.? p (TYPICAL) ID i•4 I r 6'p• �,; it' 5' -0. 2" (TYPICAL) 29' -0" HANDICAPPED STALL DETAIL NOTE: All pavement markings to be thermoplastic. F;1-1 I to o REV. I DATE I DESCRIPTION I APP. STANDARD PRE- PAINTED DISABLED PARKING SIGN ON 1/8" THICK SHEET ALUMINUM 2" HOT DIPPED GALVANIZED STANDARD WEIGHT STEEL PIPE ri: I I I 8 "X2' -6" CONCRETE MASS. I I a l Ir < I I I FINISH TOP OF MASS LEVEL _ N WITH A SLIGHT RAISED WASH I APPROXIMATELY 1/2" ABOVE LEVEL OF TURF /SOD. a' 1 1 a• HANDICAPPED SIGN DETAIL WIDE TRAFFIC BLUE IPE (TYPICAL) 6" WIDE TRAFFIC WHITE STRIPE (TYPICAL) CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA PUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATION ENGINEERING BY DATE BY TYPICAL DOUBLE INDEX NO. HANDICAPPED STALL 118 BY 2OF2 CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA PUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATION ENGINEERING REDRAWN BY DATE A.C. 5/99 CHECKED BY TYPICAL HANDICAPPED INDEX NO. t 12 /ss Updated Fine M.G. M.O. SIGN DETAIL 119 REV. DATE DESCRIPTION APP, DESIGNED BY M.G- 1 OF 1 ,y Side So J�16, yeti' C' 3' Transition NOTE: V A A Back of Curb Non -slip surface rep ments. see Note 8. if id B I ( B Conc. Sewalk PLAN VIEW Remove Curb if Existing Exist Conc Drive :" Max Sloe 12 Slope 1" , 1„ 1�� Max Slope 14„ .. 4„ 1/2" Exp. Joint 1 /2" Exp. Joint 6" TYPICAL DRIVEWAY CROSS SECTION �--} -} W o a U U- WHITE BORDER FP - 0 0 4' Min Residential Street & SYMBOL Remove Back of Curb on State or Vertical Curbs with a vertical is _ -U: »_ 5' Min Arterial Street t°_ BLUE BACKGROUND a ,o N � W G.L.B. CONCRETE & ASPHALTIC Modified and Valley Gutter Curbs 1 of 1 REV. DATE DESCRIPTION APP, 1/4" per Foot CONC. join exist back of curb Match Existing if �--- -- Existing Sidewalk rn 12" Textured Surface Grass Planting or Other PARKING BY 1 "�� Max Slope BLACK BORDER Back of Curb 3000 psi conc 4" thick. Constr. 6" DISABLED RAMP CURB m & LETTERS 6" 6" Vertical Curb PERMIT welded wire mesh. See note 7. - WHITE BACKGROUND SECTION A -A ONLY NOTES: BLACK BORDER Ramps shall have a tactile surface, textured to a depth not P lace expansion ansion joints' at driveways. exceeding 8 by use of tamp or roller in conformance with 9 $255 FINE & LETTERS of sidewalks as shown, contact the Engineering Division for F.S. 318.18 O1 WHITE CKGROUND LO ALL LETTERS T 1" SERIES "C" F;1-1 I to o REV. I DATE I DESCRIPTION I APP. STANDARD PRE- PAINTED DISABLED PARKING SIGN ON 1/8" THICK SHEET ALUMINUM 2" HOT DIPPED GALVANIZED STANDARD WEIGHT STEEL PIPE ri: I I I 8 "X2' -6" CONCRETE MASS. I I a l Ir < I I I FINISH TOP OF MASS LEVEL _ N WITH A SLIGHT RAISED WASH I APPROXIMATELY 1/2" ABOVE LEVEL OF TURF /SOD. a' 1 1 a• HANDICAPPED SIGN DETAIL WIDE TRAFFIC BLUE IPE (TYPICAL) 6" WIDE TRAFFIC WHITE STRIPE (TYPICAL) CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA PUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATION ENGINEERING BY DATE BY TYPICAL DOUBLE INDEX NO. HANDICAPPED STALL 118 BY 2OF2 CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA PUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATION ENGINEERING REDRAWN BY DATE A.C. 5/99 CHECKED BY TYPICAL HANDICAPPED INDEX NO. t 12 /ss Updated Fine M.G. M.O. SIGN DETAIL 119 REV. DATE DESCRIPTION APP, DESIGNED BY M.G- 1 OF 1 ,y Side So J�16, yeti' C' 3' Transition NOTE: V A A Back of Curb Non -slip surface rep ments. see Note 8. if id B I ( B Conc. Sewalk PLAN VIEW Remove Curb if Existing Exist Conc Drive :" Max Sloe 12 Slope 1" , 1„ 1�� Max Slope 14„ .. 4„ 1/2" Exp. Joint 1 /2" Exp. Joint 6" TYPICAL DRIVEWAY CROSS SECTION �--} -} W o a U U- FP 0 0 4' Min Residential Street 1' City R/W Remove Back of Curb on State or Vertical Curbs with a vertical Saw cut M CL 5' Min Arterial Street 2' County R/W or Remove entire Curb and Replace as Part of Sidewalk Ramp. a ,o N � W G.L.B. CONCRETE & ASPHALTIC Modified and Valley Gutter Curbs 1 of 1 REV. DATE DESCRIPTION APP, 1/4" per Foot CONC. join exist back of curb Match Existing if �--- -- Existing Sidewalk J 12" Textured Surface Grass Planting or Other O 0 1 "�� Max Slope -•• :.; �:° Back of Curb 3000 psi conc 4" thick. Constr. 6" p RAMP CURB thick at driveways with 6x6 #10 W cr 6" 6" Vertical Curb e Remove to an welded wire mesh. See note 7. - �1/2" Expansion Joint even joint or sawcut SECTION A -A SECTION B -B NOTES: 1. Provide tooled joints at distances matching the width. Also 8. Ramps shall have a tactile surface, textured to a depth not P lace expansion ansion joints' at driveways. exceeding 8 by use of tamp or roller in conformance with 9 2. If some physical obstruction exists which p ys prevents the placing s requirements of FDOT Roadway and Traffic Design Standards, of sidewalks as shown, contact the Engineering Division for Detail 304 or most recent modifications. alternate location. 3. Wooden and other spacers will not be permitted in sidewalks or driveways. 4. No coatings of any kind will be permitted on concrete sidewalks or driveways without specific approval of the City Engineer. 5. All concrete shall be 3000 psi min. ® 28 days, with fiber 3 4/9/02 Rev. Notes R.G. mesh reinforcing. 2 1/95 added note 6. Concrete surface to be light broom finish. 7. Concrete driveway construction shall be 6" thick w 6x6 /10x10 1 11/93 modified curb cut JWR welded wire mesh reinforcement. REV. DATE DESCRIPTION APP. FDOT Type S -3 Asph. Conc. patch to be 2" min. thickness or match existing for thickness in excess of 2" CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA PUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATION ENGINEERING BY TYPICAL SIDEWALK DA 193 BY CONSTRUCTION AND INDEX NO. BY RAMP DETAIL 109 4' Min. Patch Resurface full width of Monolithic Slab street on longitudinal T +2" (8" Min. Replace Base installations 3,000 psi Fiber compacted Thickness) Mesh Concrete 1 OF 3 If this point is within 4' of an existing joint, then replace to the joint. %d a 4 ,. . Replacement base ` \\ /� Existing Concrete material shall be Undisturbed Exist Base approved by the Engineer per City W dry Article 22 6„ 12" Trench 12" 6„ - 18" Trench 18" Width Min. Width Min. Varies Varies Undisturbed Trench Side Undisturbed Trench Side BoofTkpacted Compacted �/ T= Thickness of % �� T =6" until W exceeds original Base 6'f then T =8" ASPHALT STREET AND DRIVEWAY REPLACEMENT REQUIRED FOR UTILITY CONSTRUCTION hllh. 5 Resitl e mih htlQl Arte • St. riot St G' o tR1` CONCRETE REPLACEMENT REQUIRED FOR UTILITY CONSTRUCTION If "x" is less than 48" then the slope of the flared side shall not exceed 12 :1. ISOMETRIC VIEW CURB DROP CURB TRANSITION CURB TRANSITION BACK OF SIDEWALK ELEVATION A -A NOTES: 1. Ramps are designed to ,the Uniform Federal Accessibility Standards to comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act. 2. Ramps Shall Have a Tactile Surface, Textured to a Depth Not Exceeding 1/8" by use of Tamp or roller In Conformance with Requirements of FDOT Roadway and Traffic Design Standards, Detail 304 Or Most Recent Modifications. Exist. Type I Curb Remove Back of Curb Flow Line if Existing RETURNED CURB RAMPS � VALLEY GUTTER CURB E7, CONC RAMP A •4 a 1 4/14/95 Isometric view redrawn 1 1/95 Added note REV. DATE DESCRIPTION APP. Textured Surface a 4 4 4„ 12:1 MAX. SECTION B -B CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA PUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATION ENGINEERING REDRAWN BY TYPICAL SIDEWALK DATE P.W.D. 1 93 CHECKED BY CURB CUT RAMPS INDEX NO. DESIGNED BY PHYSICALLY HANDICAPPED 109 C.M.H. 2 OF 3 r Cn �o�o W J ;• C: u_ C" O m d- 2^ W -0 N � = c 7. >_'''' V C -F� a) 00 a r ® ' � O > O cn 't a) � C15 N N -0 70 a) C 0 r O CL Z W Or rn Om N Z Z O 14 o o= � r ZWU CZ co m -1N w -1 �-- �O�' o a r ' •, z�Z ftE�, - a 0 O iR `: t"3i rn Www otf o• H §12 111 "- I , Ill ,a W 11I {mm: ; UUZ Q W i r y ui Q W vr- 30 �c �� •" aD U m X rr o CC N co O H Z W Z = - � LD LL Z �oz Ca 3 a. >- 'L co = Z Ucr- U W CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA PUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATION U U- ENGINEERING R NRaAW BY STREET AND DRIVEWAY DATE 1 4/4/2002 Rev. Notes; G.L.B. CHECKED BY REPLACEMENT FOR CCU INDEX N0. Remove sheet 2 of 2 W G.L.B. CONCRETE & ASPHALTIC 104 1 of 1 REV. DATE DESCRIPTION APP, DESIGNED BY c.M.H. CONCRETE SURFACES CONC. SIDEWALK Match Existing if Grass Planting or Other Existing Sidewalk J Non - Walking Surface Grass Planting or Other O 0 Non - Walking Surface 4'/5' p RAMP CURB 6" W cr 6" 6" Vertical Curb CC W J - in Transition 00W If "x" is less than 48" then the slope of the flared side shall not exceed 12 :1. ISOMETRIC VIEW CURB DROP CURB TRANSITION CURB TRANSITION BACK OF SIDEWALK ELEVATION A -A NOTES: 1. Ramps are designed to ,the Uniform Federal Accessibility Standards to comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act. 2. Ramps Shall Have a Tactile Surface, Textured to a Depth Not Exceeding 1/8" by use of Tamp or roller In Conformance with Requirements of FDOT Roadway and Traffic Design Standards, Detail 304 Or Most Recent Modifications. Exist. Type I Curb Remove Back of Curb Flow Line if Existing RETURNED CURB RAMPS � VALLEY GUTTER CURB E7, CONC RAMP A •4 a 1 4/14/95 Isometric view redrawn 1 1/95 Added note REV. DATE DESCRIPTION APP. Textured Surface a 4 4 4„ 12:1 MAX. SECTION B -B CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA PUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATION ENGINEERING REDRAWN BY TYPICAL SIDEWALK DATE P.W.D. 1 93 CHECKED BY CURB CUT RAMPS INDEX NO. DESIGNED BY PHYSICALLY HANDICAPPED 109 C.M.H. 2 OF 3 r Cn �o�o W J ;• C: u_ C" O m d- 2^ W -0 N � = c 7. >_'''' V C -F� a) 00 a r ® ' � O > O cn 't a) � C15 N N -0 70 a) C 0 r O CL Z W Or rn Om N Z Z O 14 o o= � r ZWU CZ co m -1N w -1 �-- �O�' o a r ' •, z�Z ftE�, - a 0 O iR `: t"3i rn Www otf o• H §12 111 "- I , Ill ,a W 11I {mm: ; UUZ Q W i r y ui Q W vr- 30 �c �� •" aD U m X rr o CC N co O H Z W Z = - � LD LL Z �oz Ca 3 a. >- 'L co = Z Ucr- U CAD FILE HARRISON DETAILS REVISIONS SCALE 0 0.5" 1. DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: PROJ. MAN.: JOB NO, DATE: 2008 -02 -27 SHEET NO. �o7 W U U- U- 0az CCU 0 W o0 LL Er _ W J O 0 p 1= W cr CC W J - 00W LL M LO T CAD FILE HARRISON DETAILS REVISIONS SCALE 0 0.5" 1. DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: PROJ. MAN.: JOB NO, DATE: 2008 -02 -27 SHEET NO. �o7 1 Outfall Structure ` DETENTION POND N.T.S. 12' Max. ',,,,6" Underdrain SECTION A —A N.T.S. Two—C-1/16 (222 °) Str ASTM D3034 —SDR 35 6" o 8" PVC Underdrain (Refer Plans for Diameter) 6"or 8" X 6" P v � ..yam NOTES: 1) FDOT standard underdrain is acceptable with 6" minimum pipe. 2) No ADS pipe shall be used for 0 0 underdrain on City projects. CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA PUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATION ENGINEERING REDRAWN BY DATE Novo 3/00 1 5/03 Add Notes, Chg. ASTM B. Barker CHECKED BY UNDERDRAIN DETAIL FOR INDE% N( DESK o BY DRY DETENTION AREAS 217 REV. DATE DESCRIPTION APP. o r c 1 OF 1 TERMINAL END UNDERDRAIN CLEANOUT DETAIL n. s. F Brass Cleanout Plug r 8" 18" Square IIII 'III Concrete Pad, �l R" Thir`le 3 WORKING DAYS BEFORE YOU DIG CALL SUNSHINE STATE ONE CALL OF FLORIDA 1- 800 - 432 -4770 FOR THE LOCATION OF UNDERGROUND FACILITIES THE LOCATIONS OF EXISTING UNDERGROUND UTILITIES ARE SHOWN IN AN APPROXIMATE WAY ONLY AND HAVE NOT BEEN INDEPENDENTLY VERIFIED BY THE OWNER OR ITS REPRESENTATIVE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL DETERMINE THE EXACT LOCATION OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES BEFORE COMMENCING WORK, AND AGREES TO BE FULLY RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY AND ALL DAMAGES WHICH MIGHT BE OCCASIONED BY THE CONTRACTOR'S FAILURE TO EXACTLY LOCATE AND PRESERVE ANY AND ALL UNDERGROUND UTILITIES. 1 12/02 Revised Detail E.A. REV. DATE DESCRIPTION APP. lopped Plug )FF D 2" Ball Val' Hose Bibb — 3/4" Golvan 2" Galva 2" Corporat Tapping Sad, TOP CONNECTION CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA END CONNECTION PUBLIC WORKS ENGINEERING ISTRATION VM EDRA R B.V.DBY TEMP BLOWOFF 06/24 D T CHECKED 13 AND INDEX NO DESIGNED BY SAMPLE TAP REV. DATE DESCRIPTION APP. G.C.H. 2 OF 2 Overlap filter material 18" across top of aggregate. Backfill trench with select pervious material. 1\ % /� %/� %x x x x x x X x x x jj \\ x� xxx xvaries X xX \\ x x x x x x \ \\ / 0 0 00 0000 ° Perimeter of aggregate 0O0 121P °0 00 ° i Filter aggregate for underdrains shall be as to be fully wrapped with 0,00 ° 0 ° specified in the FDOT Standard Specifications, Non Degrading Fiberous ° ° °0 0 0 C) Section 901 — Course Aggregate, and shall Filter Type Material as °0 0 ° o° be either #6 or #57. If #57 is used, it must Directed by Engineer, 010 , ° °° ° be washed and screened to remove fines. Mirafi 140 N or approved equal. 6" ___ 6" The aggregate may be stone, slag, or crushed gravel. cc) O O " 0 0 Unless otherwise noted, underdrain pipe shall be 8 " min. diameter PVC with perforations down — See Technical Specifications for details. TYPICAL SUBDRAIN SECTION See Ian for 20' Compacted Fill p & Sod 16' Max. CLEANOUT Elev. I-- —{ 1. 1. ) _I*e - �I(, --\ �11 18» e e X `, #8 Anchor Rod f 4 ' 10'0.C. s: —r� Filter X At Each Joint per Detail 6" or 8" Cemented Cap Note: 1. Cleonout Faces Downstream. 2. All Cleanouts are 6" Only. CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA PUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATION ENGINEERING BY TERMINAL END IY UNDERDRAIN 2 OF 2 NON— ROADWAY REV. I DATE I DESCRIPTION I APP, N ° e d ° Ll • .de LO d .e JOINT DETAIL is N \ ° X 1' Min. FFilter X fabric tail ° - Anchor pile replaces . Conc. anchor when a a See plan fo� Specified by Engr. 1 7/8 „.' `n Elev. ELEVATION n ° 16' I Preformed Exp. Joint 2 1/2 48' O/C 2 1/2” \ 00 •..I: ' I o 1d Clear 12" 17 •< • (4) #4 Bar .e 4 8 3/16" 5 ANCHOR ROD DETAIL (4) #4 Bar _ CAP 4 4 _ Continuous DETAIL ()# Bar 00 °• ANCHOR —� 00 DETAIL j� 21/2" ' 1 NOTE: f Clear V) 4:' ; All concrete to be 3,500 p.s.i. at 28 day cure, with fiber mesh #8 Anchor Rod w/ reinforcing. 2 Coats Bitumostic 1 4/9/02 Rev. Note R.G. 10' On Center (Typ.) REV. DATE DESCRIPTION APP. X 3' 4' 5' 6' Y 18'110'112'114'1 ELBOWS Sand Filter Medium Per Section VALVE DRAWN BY: 902.13 F.D.O.T. Standard Specification For Road And Bridge Construction. Sand Grown Sod Uniformity Coefficient 1.5 Or Greater. A 11.25 22.50 Effective Grain Size Of 0.20 To 1 SADDLE NOTES 0.55mm In Diameter. (Typical) 4 2 2 3/29/05 Chg. Service Saddle R.S.F. REDRAWN BY B.V.D. Line trench and cover aggregate DATE 01 15 1Q with unwoven filter fabric. (Mirafi 140 —N or equal.) .. °� ° °O. :• -' ' o ° co O . ° °°. 0.�° ° o ° °�° ° CHECKED BY ° 0 g° °0 ° 45° 6" P.V.C. Underdrain 00 O 0 O 8 ° �`- 00 0o °$ °° ° ° A.S.T.M. D3034, A 1/2" Min. Filter TUBING TYPE GCH 1 g °� F 949 Or Equal Aggregate REV. DATE DESCRIPTION As Approved By DESICMEn 9Y 1 OF City Engineer. 24' 12' SECTION 13-13 _) Max. I Max. N.T.S. ',,,,6" Underdrain SECTION A —A N.T.S. Two—C-1/16 (222 °) Str ASTM D3034 —SDR 35 6" o 8" PVC Underdrain (Refer Plans for Diameter) 6"or 8" X 6" P v � ..yam NOTES: 1) FDOT standard underdrain is acceptable with 6" minimum pipe. 2) No ADS pipe shall be used for 0 0 underdrain on City projects. CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA PUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATION ENGINEERING REDRAWN BY DATE Novo 3/00 1 5/03 Add Notes, Chg. ASTM B. Barker CHECKED BY UNDERDRAIN DETAIL FOR INDE% N( DESK o BY DRY DETENTION AREAS 217 REV. DATE DESCRIPTION APP. o r c 1 OF 1 TERMINAL END UNDERDRAIN CLEANOUT DETAIL n. s. F Brass Cleanout Plug r 8" 18" Square IIII 'III Concrete Pad, �l R" Thir`le 3 WORKING DAYS BEFORE YOU DIG CALL SUNSHINE STATE ONE CALL OF FLORIDA 1- 800 - 432 -4770 FOR THE LOCATION OF UNDERGROUND FACILITIES THE LOCATIONS OF EXISTING UNDERGROUND UTILITIES ARE SHOWN IN AN APPROXIMATE WAY ONLY AND HAVE NOT BEEN INDEPENDENTLY VERIFIED BY THE OWNER OR ITS REPRESENTATIVE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL DETERMINE THE EXACT LOCATION OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES BEFORE COMMENCING WORK, AND AGREES TO BE FULLY RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY AND ALL DAMAGES WHICH MIGHT BE OCCASIONED BY THE CONTRACTOR'S FAILURE TO EXACTLY LOCATE AND PRESERVE ANY AND ALL UNDERGROUND UTILITIES. 1 12/02 Revised Detail E.A. REV. DATE DESCRIPTION APP. lopped Plug )FF D 2" Ball Val' Hose Bibb — 3/4" Golvan 2" Galva 2" Corporat Tapping Sad, TOP CONNECTION CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA END CONNECTION PUBLIC WORKS ENGINEERING ISTRATION VM EDRA R B.V.DBY TEMP BLOWOFF 06/24 D T CHECKED 13 AND INDEX NO DESIGNED BY SAMPLE TAP REV. DATE DESCRIPTION APP. G.C.H. 2 OF 2 Overlap filter material 18" across top of aggregate. Backfill trench with select pervious material. 1\ % /� %/� %x x x x x x X x x x jj \\ x� xxx xvaries X xX \\ x x x x x x \ \\ / 0 0 00 0000 ° Perimeter of aggregate 0O0 121P °0 00 ° i Filter aggregate for underdrains shall be as to be fully wrapped with 0,00 ° 0 ° specified in the FDOT Standard Specifications, Non Degrading Fiberous ° ° °0 0 0 C) Section 901 — Course Aggregate, and shall Filter Type Material as °0 0 ° o° be either #6 or #57. If #57 is used, it must Directed by Engineer, 010 , ° °° ° be washed and screened to remove fines. Mirafi 140 N or approved equal. 6" ___ 6" The aggregate may be stone, slag, or crushed gravel. cc) O O " 0 0 Unless otherwise noted, underdrain pipe shall be 8 " min. diameter PVC with perforations down — See Technical Specifications for details. TYPICAL SUBDRAIN SECTION See Ian for 20' Compacted Fill p & Sod 16' Max. CLEANOUT Elev. I-- —{ 1. 1. ) _I*e - �I(, --\ �11 18» e e X `, #8 Anchor Rod f 4 ' 10'0.C. s: —r� Filter X At Each Joint per Detail 6" or 8" Cemented Cap Note: 1. Cleonout Faces Downstream. 2. All Cleanouts are 6" Only. CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA PUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATION ENGINEERING BY TERMINAL END IY UNDERDRAIN 2 OF 2 NON— ROADWAY REV. I DATE I DESCRIPTION I APP, N ° e d ° Ll • .de LO d .e JOINT DETAIL is N \ ° X 1' Min. FFilter X fabric tail ° - Anchor pile replaces . Conc. anchor when a a See plan fo� Specified by Engr. 1 7/8 „.' `n Elev. ELEVATION n ° 16' I Preformed Exp. Joint 2 1/2 48' O/C 2 1/2” \ 00 •..I: ' I o 1d Clear 12" 17 •< • (4) #4 Bar .e 4 8 3/16" 5 ANCHOR ROD DETAIL (4) #4 Bar _ CAP 4 4 _ Continuous DETAIL ()# Bar 00 °• ANCHOR —� 00 DETAIL j� 21/2" ' 1 NOTE: f Clear V) 4:' ; All concrete to be 3,500 p.s.i. at 28 day cure, with fiber mesh #8 Anchor Rod w/ reinforcing. 2 Coats Bitumostic 1 4/9/02 Rev. Note R.G. 10' On Center (Typ.) REV. DATE DESCRIPTION APP. X 3' 4' 5' 6' Y 18'110'112'114'1 CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA PUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATION ENGINEERING p Y UNDERDRAIN DATE BY DETAIL INDEX NI G. NON— ROADWAY 219 D BY Q. 1 OF 1 A V CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA PUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATION ENGINEERING N eY RETAINING WALL SYSTEM I eY Typical For Clwr. Harbor, Channels & Ponds 1 OF 1 StoD Less Check MUELLE Compre: Threaded Cc MUELLER H1 or approved ( TAP AT 4 Saddle required 4" P.V.C. only 0 Iron service saddle Ford FC 202 series W /stainless steel band or approved equal. r CHLORINATION TAP \2/ 3/29/05 Chg. Service Saddle R.S.F. v1� 8/7/95 Chg. Service Tubing type G.C.H. REV. DATE DESCRIPTION APP. Endot /Yardley -08 Polyethylene 0 CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA PUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATION ENGINEERING 3Y Y CHLORINATION TAP �, SERVICE CONNECTION DETAIL NOTES: 1. WATER MAINS TO BE ON NORTH or EAST SIDE OF R.O.W., APPROX. 4 FT. BACK OF CURB UNLESS OTHERWISE AUTHORIZED BY CITY ENGINEER. 2. SERVICE CONNECTIONS TO BE 2 FT. FROM SIDE LOT LINE ON EITHER SIDE OF LOT (SEE SHEET NO. 3). THESE SERVICES TO BE CONSISTENT WITHIN THE SUBDIVISION. DRIVEWAYS SHALL NOT BE BUILT OVER METERS. 3. ALL LINES SHALL BE CHLORINATED AND PRESSURE TESTED (TEST FOR ONE HOUR @ 150 P.S.I.) UNDER THE DIRECTION OF THE UTILITIES DEPARTMENT. AFTER SUCCESSFUL COMPLETION OF THE TESTING AND CHLORINATION, THE PRESSURE SHALL REMAIN ON THE SYSTEM AT ALL TIMES. 4. TEN FT. SEPARATION REQUIRED BETWEEN PARALLEL WATER & SANITARY SEWER LINES. 05. SADDLE IS REQUIRED FOR ALL SERVICE CONNECTIONS TO MAINS. 6. MINIMUM DISTANCE BETWEEN SERVICE TAPS TO BE NOT LESS THAN 36 ". AS Threaded Corporation Stop MUELLER B -25008 or approved equal (Tap at 45° Angle) ,&Iron service saddle Ford FC 202 series w /stainless steel band and epoxy coated ductile iron body or approved equal. �X� 1 OF 2 0 Curb Stop f MUELLER H24350 or Ford B43- 332 —WQ with Lock Wing and Compression inlet (3/4" or 1" use meter swivel nut, 1 -1/2" or 2" use FIP outlet) or approved equal Water Service Tubing Driscopipe 5100 or Endot /Yardley Blue Jet, SDR 9, 3408 Polyethylene ELBOWS (deg.) VALVE DRAWN BY: CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA PUBLIC WENG ADMIINISTRATION CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA PUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATION ENGINEERING p Y UNDERDRAIN DATE BY DETAIL INDEX NI G. NON— ROADWAY 219 D BY Q. 1 OF 1 A V CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA PUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATION ENGINEERING N eY RETAINING WALL SYSTEM I eY Typical For Clwr. Harbor, Channels & Ponds 1 OF 1 StoD Less Check MUELLE Compre: Threaded Cc MUELLER H1 or approved ( TAP AT 4 Saddle required 4" P.V.C. only 0 Iron service saddle Ford FC 202 series W /stainless steel band or approved equal. r CHLORINATION TAP \2/ 3/29/05 Chg. Service Saddle R.S.F. v1� 8/7/95 Chg. Service Tubing type G.C.H. REV. DATE DESCRIPTION APP. Endot /Yardley -08 Polyethylene 0 CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA PUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATION ENGINEERING 3Y Y CHLORINATION TAP �, SERVICE CONNECTION DETAIL NOTES: 1. WATER MAINS TO BE ON NORTH or EAST SIDE OF R.O.W., APPROX. 4 FT. BACK OF CURB UNLESS OTHERWISE AUTHORIZED BY CITY ENGINEER. 2. SERVICE CONNECTIONS TO BE 2 FT. FROM SIDE LOT LINE ON EITHER SIDE OF LOT (SEE SHEET NO. 3). THESE SERVICES TO BE CONSISTENT WITHIN THE SUBDIVISION. DRIVEWAYS SHALL NOT BE BUILT OVER METERS. 3. ALL LINES SHALL BE CHLORINATED AND PRESSURE TESTED (TEST FOR ONE HOUR @ 150 P.S.I.) UNDER THE DIRECTION OF THE UTILITIES DEPARTMENT. AFTER SUCCESSFUL COMPLETION OF THE TESTING AND CHLORINATION, THE PRESSURE SHALL REMAIN ON THE SYSTEM AT ALL TIMES. 4. TEN FT. SEPARATION REQUIRED BETWEEN PARALLEL WATER & SANITARY SEWER LINES. 05. SADDLE IS REQUIRED FOR ALL SERVICE CONNECTIONS TO MAINS. 6. MINIMUM DISTANCE BETWEEN SERVICE TAPS TO BE NOT LESS THAN 36 ". AS Threaded Corporation Stop MUELLER B -25008 or approved equal (Tap at 45° Angle) ,&Iron service saddle Ford FC 202 series w /stainless steel band and epoxy coated ductile iron body or approved equal. �X� 1 OF 2 0 Curb Stop f MUELLER H24350 or Ford B43- 332 —WQ with Lock Wing and Compression inlet (3/4" or 1" use meter swivel nut, 1 -1/2" or 2" use FIP outlet) or approved equal Water Service Tubing Driscopipe 5100 or Endot /Yardley Blue Jet, SDR 9, 3408 Polyethylene P.V.C. PIPE RESTRAINT THE FOLLOWING JOINTS MUST BE RESTRAINED IN ALL APPLICATIONS: 1. BEND —INLET AND OUTLET 2. TEE — OUTLET BRANCH 3. OFFSETS — INLET AND OUTLET 4. CAPS 5. PLUGS 6. DEAD ENDS 7. HYDRANT RUNOUTS SHALL BE RESTRAINED AS DEAD ENDS L Megalug Restrainer (Typ.) Ebba 1500 Series (Typ.) ON ALL TEES, A MINIMUM OF 5 SHALL BE RESTRAINED ON EACH RUN LEG L = MINIMUM LENGTH TO BE RESTRAINED ON EACH SIDE OF FITTING (ft.) FIGURES BASED ON 30" DEPTH BURY, 150 PSI TEST PRESSURE. 8" PVC MAXIMUM SIZE USED IN SYSTEM NOM. ELBOWS (deg.) VALVE DRAWN BY: CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA Water Main PUBLIC WENG ADMIINISTRATION 3Q 5/9/05 REV. CURB STOP, CORP ISTOP, SIZE 11.25 22.50 45 90 SADDLE NOTES R.F. 4 2 2 3/29/05 Chg. Service Saddle R.S.F. REDRAWN BY B.V.D. 6 DATE 01 15 1Q 12/22/94 REV. WATER SERVICE 1 47 CHECKED BY WATER MAIN SERVICE INDEX NO. 8 16 38 66 TUBING TYPE GCH CONNECTION DETAIL 13 REV. DATE DESCRIPTION App, DESICMEn 9Y 1 OF P.V.C. PIPE RESTRAINT THE FOLLOWING JOINTS MUST BE RESTRAINED IN ALL APPLICATIONS: 1. BEND —INLET AND OUTLET 2. TEE — OUTLET BRANCH 3. OFFSETS — INLET AND OUTLET 4. CAPS 5. PLUGS 6. DEAD ENDS 7. HYDRANT RUNOUTS SHALL BE RESTRAINED AS DEAD ENDS L Megalug Restrainer (Typ.) Ebba 1500 Series (Typ.) ON ALL TEES, A MINIMUM OF 5 SHALL BE RESTRAINED ON EACH RUN LEG L = MINIMUM LENGTH TO BE RESTRAINED ON EACH SIDE OF FITTING (ft.) FIGURES BASED ON 30" DEPTH BURY, 150 PSI TEST PRESSURE. 8" PVC MAXIMUM SIZE USED IN SYSTEM NOM. ELBOWS (deg.) VALVE DRAWN BY: PIPE m JOB NO. DATE: 2008 -02 -27 TEES DEAD SIZE 11.25 22.50 45 90 BRANCH END 4 2 4 9 21 28 46 6 3 1 6 12 29 1 47 65 8 4 8 16 38 66 85 1 n SCALE 0 0.5" 1" DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: m JOB NO. DATE: 2008 -02 -27 SHEET NO. 6 Z • i / C 4�+0 is '9 a) N J 0 co 0 p 'U E (D 7 NOTE: THRUST RESTRAINT AT FITTINGS AND VALVES SHALL BE BY USE OF EBBA IRON MEGALUG RESTRAINERS. THRUST RESTRAINT BETWEEN PIPE JOINTS SHALL BE BY EBBA IRON SERIES 1500 RESTRAINERS. REV. I DATE I DESCRIPTION I APP. CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA PUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATION _ ENGINEERING 13Y 9 eY THRUST I RESTRAINING A T o M 00 N co -1 o V— O �0) W W N LU i r U IL LL M 00 CL -rE—+ T � O > O�d�- N 0) . C\j ® ®v)� 70 -a ai �� M o T O � 0 ' n SCALE 0 0.5" 1" DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: m JOB NO. DATE: 2008 -02 -27 SHEET NO. 6 Z • i / C 4�+0 �U a) N J 0 co 0 p 'U E (D 7 J 0 C Q w LL aif m o W ui -ow 0 Z .0 O- c v M _gym jZ w rN: 05 w C a) o 0. U •; i ° o G Q ?0 I Z UU iU_ O U ) Z r`a ) co O0 Z -T_ iU W UJ 2 CD J W U LL LL Q Z Q O Z �U �O� �'J LL r ar. LL Cr. Z W � QO Cr LU Cr ti J U' QUA LL c" J LO CAD FILE HARRISON DETAILS DATE t02/99 DEX NO. 1 OF 2 REVISIONS SCALE 0 0.5" 1" DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: PROJ. MAN.: JOB NO. DATE: 2008 -02 -27 SHEET NO. 3 WORKING DAYS BEFORE YOU DIG CALL SUNSHINE STATE ONE CALL OF FLORIDA 1 -800- 432 -4770 FOR THE LOCATION OF UNDERGROUND FACILITIES THE LOCATIONS OF EXISTING UNDERGROUND UTILITIES ARE SHOWN IN AN APPROXIMATE WAY ONLY AND HAVE NOT BEEN INDEPENDENTLY VERIFIED BY THE OWNER OR ITS REPRESENTATIVE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL DETERMINE THE EXACT LOCATION OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES BEFORE COMMENCING WORK, AND AGREES TO BE FULLY RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY AND ALL DAMAGES WHICH MIGHT BE OCCASIONED BY THE CONTRACTOR'S FAILURE TO EXACTLY LOCATE AND PRESERVE ANY AND ALL UNDERGROUND UTILITIES. PLANT SPACING DETAIL (24" OFFSET CLEARWATER INDEX No. 903, SH. 2 of 2 Rev. 8/05/05 N.T.S. ALL SHRUBS /GROUNDCOVER TO BE TRIANGULAR SPACING. SEE PLANT LIST FOR (D.C.) SPACING. /2 O.C. iPACING MIN. SETBACK FOR SHRUBS do !4. GROUNDCOVERS PLANT SPACING DETAIL (NO- OFFSET) CLEARWATER INDEX No. 903, SH. 1 of 2 Rev. 8/05/05 N.T.S. TILLED AND LOOSENED NATIVE SOIL BACKFILL� 6� f g ROOTBALL 00: FERTILIZER TABLETS AS SPECIFED. PLACE UNIFORMLY AROUND ROOT MAW BETWEEN MIDDLE AND BOTTOM OF ROOT MASS BACK OF CURB / BED LINE ALL SHRUBS /GROUNDCOVER TO BE TRIANGULAR SPACING. SEE PLANT UST FOR O.C. SPACING. 1/2 O.C. SPACING MIN. SETBACK FOR SHRUBS & GROUNDCOVERS BACK OF CURB / BED LINE CABBAGE PALMS MAY BE HURRICANE CUT ALL OTHERS MUST HAVE FRONDS TIED W/BIODEGRADABLE STRAP OR TWINE STRAIGHT AND FREE OF SCARS, BOOTS NOTE STAKING & GUYING REQUIRED FOR PALM, IF NECESSARY, OR AS DIRECTED BY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. 5 LAYERS OF BURLAP. 5 - 2'x4'x16' WOODEN BATTENS CONNECTED WITH 2-3/4- STEEL BANDS OR APPROVED ALTERNATE REMOVE BURLAP AND ALL TIE MATERIAL FROM TYNE TOP 1/3 OF ROOTBALL �-- 2'X4' WOOD BRACE (3 EA, MIN.) NAIL TO BATTENS dt STAKES WATER RING (6' WIDTH & HEIGHT) PROVIDING A WATER COLLECTION BASIN f (3) 27x4'x36' WOODEN STAKES OF THE ROOTBALL PALM PLANTING DETAIL CLEARWATER INDEX No. 904, SH. 1of 1 Rev. 8/21/06 N.T.S. 3' MULCH LAYER EXISRNG UNDISTURBED SO4 HEI FERTILIZER TABLETS AS SPECIFIED. PLACE UNIFORMLY AROUND ROOT MASS BETWEEN MIDDLE AND BOTTOM OF ROOT MASS MULCH 3' FROM STEMS 3' MULCH LAYER REPARED PLANTING SOIL EXISTING UNDISTURBED SOIL SHRUB & GROUNDCOVER PLANTING DETAIL CLEARWATER INDEX No. 905, SH. 1 of 1 Rev. 7/15/99 N.T.S. GENERAL LANDSCAPE NOTES 1. The Landscape Contractor shall grade planting beds, as required, to provide positive drainage and promote optimum plant growth. 2. All recommended trees and plant materials will be graded as Nursery Grade No. 1 or better as outlined by the Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, Division of Plant Industry "Grades and Standards for Nursery Plants'. 7th Edition, 1998 as revised from time to time. 3. All planting shall be done in accordance with the Florida Nurserymen's and Growers Associations approved practices. 4. All plants shall be fertilized with Agriform 20 -10-5 tablets as per the manufacturers specifications in conjunction with note # 5. 5. The planting soil shall be the approximate proportions as follows: 50% sand and 50% organic material consisting of native peat, well- decomposed sawdust, leaf mold and top soil. It shall provide a good pliable and thoroughly mixed medium with adequate aeration, drainage and water - holding capacity. It shall also be free of all extraneous debris, such as roots, stones, weeds, etc. 6. All planting areas shall receive o 3" layer of recycled hardwood log mulch, which is to be watered -in after installation. 7. The plant material schedule is presented for the convenience of the Landscape Contractor. In the event of a discrepancy between the plan and the plant key, the plan shall prevail. B. Plants shall meet size, container, and spacing specifications. Any material not meeting specifications shall be removed and replaced at the contractors expense. 9. All tree and shrub locations are subject to change. All locations shall be approved by the City Project Manager prior to planting. 10. The Landscape Contractor shall be responsible for examining fully both the site and the bid documents. Discrepancies in the documents or the actual site conditions shall be reported to the City Project Manager in writing at the time of bidding or discovery. No account shall be made after contract completion for failure to report such condition, or for errors on the part of the Landscape Contractor at the time of bidding. 11. The Landscape Contractor shall be responsible for securing all necessary applicable permits and licenses to perform the work set forth in this plan set and the specifications. 12. Plant material shall be bid as specified unless unavailable, at which time the City Project Manager will be notified by telephone and in writing of intended changes. 13. Any and all questions concerning the plan set and /or specifications shall be directed to the City Project Manager at (727) 562 -4737. 14. There shall be no additions, deletions or substitutions without the written approval of the City Project Manager. 15. The Landscape Contractor shall guarantee, in writing, plant survivability for a period of twelve (12) months from final acceptance by the City Project Manager. 16. All dimensions to be field- checked by the Landscape Contractor prior to landscape material installation. Discrepancies shall be reported immediately to the City Project Manager. 17. All materials must be as specified on the landscape plan. If materials or labor do not adhere to specifications, they will be rejected by the City Project Manager with proper installation carried out by Landscape Contractor at no additional cost. 18. All permits necessary are to be provided by the installing contractor unless otherwise specifically stated in the specifications. 19. No contractor identification signs shall be permitted on the project, except for the project information signs. 20. Existing sod shall be removed as necessary to accomodate new plantings. 21. Any existing sod areas that are unnecessarily disturbed during the landscape installation shall be resodded to match existing. 22. The Landscape Contractor will be responsible for the collection, removal, and proper disposal of any and all debris generated during the installation of this project. FERTILIZATION NOTES SHRUBS AND TREES All trees and shrubs shall be fertilized with " Agriform" 20 -15 -5 planting tablets at time of installation and prior to completion of pit backfilling. Tablets shall be placed uniformly around the root mass at a depth that is between the middle and bottom of the root mass. APPLICATION RATE: 1 Galion can: 1 - 21 gram tablet 3 Gallon can: 2 - 21 gram tablets 5 Gallon can: 3 - 21 gram tablets 7 Galion can: 4- 21 gram tablets Trees: 3- 21 gram tablets each 1/2" of caliper Palms: 7 - 21 gram tablets GROUNDCOVER AREAS All groundcover areas shall receive fertilization with "Ozmocote" time release fertilizer as per manufacturers specifications. TRUNK SHALL BE MAINTAINED IN A VERTICAL POSTION #12 GAUGE WIRE AND PROTECTIVE RUBBER HOSE INSTALL TOP OF ROOT BALL 3 -4" ABOVE FINISH 0 GRADE r4 / ) 2 "X2' WOODEN STAKE 3" MULCH LAYER 0 (1' OVER ROOT J U BALL) ® ROOT BALL: _ FINISH GRADE PLANTING HOLE SHALL BE OJ - 2' LARGER THAN THE " " ROOT BALL DIAMETER - U EXISTING UNDISTURBED SOIL PREPARED PLANTING SOIL COMPACTED SOIL TO 9 -N MINIMIZE SETTLING PINE TREE PLANTING DETAIL CLEARWATER INDEX No. 907, SH. 1 of 1 Rev. 7/23/99 N.T.S. NOTES: 1. ALL WOOD SHALL BE SPRUCE OR PINE -NOT PRESSURE TREATED. 2. CROSS TIES SHALL NOT CROSS OVER WOODY ROOTS. 3. REMOVE ALL STRING & /OR WIRE WRAPPED AROUND TRUNK. 4. REMOVE ALL STRAPS, ROPES, WIRE, & /OR STRINGS USED TO LIFT THE ROOTBALL 5. REMOVE ALL BURLAP & /OR HARE FROM THE TOP OF THE ROOT BALL. A6. TOP OF ROOTBALL TO BE SET LEVEL WITH SURROUNDING FINISH GRADE. HEIGHT 2 "X2'X4' STAKE X2 X4 CROSS ME 2'X2 "X4' s18 "MIN. ROOTBALL CROSS MEMBER TILLED AND LOI NATIVE SOIL B/ 2 -25' 2'X2'X4' ST DRYWALL SCREWS z h z HARDWOODS DRIP 0 OF DRIP LINE HORIZONTAL TREE PLANTING �a MORM DETAIL CLEARWATER INDEX No. 908, SH. 1 of 1 Rev. 8/16/08 N.T.S. TO 5 TIMES THE WI OF THE ROOTBALL SPECIFICATIONS - WOOD BARRIER 1. MINIMUM RADIUS TO BE PROTECTED: A. HARDWOODS - 2/3 DRIPUNE B. CONIFERS & SABAL PALMS - ENTIRE DRIPUNE. 2. UPRIGHTS - NO LESS THAN 2" X 2" LUMBER. 3. HORIZONTALS - NO LESS THAN 1' X 4" LUMBER. 4. BARRIERS SHALL BE ERECTED AROUND ALL PROTECTED TREES AND PALMS AND INSPECTED BY CITY REPRESENTATIVE BEFORE CONSTRUCTION BEGINS. 5. UPRIGHT POSTS ARE TO BE AT LEAST 4 FEET IN LENGTH WITH A MINIMUM OF 1 FOOT ANCHORED IN GROUND AND 3 FEET ABOVE GROUND. 6. BARRIERS TO REMAIN IN PLACE UNTIL ALL PAVING, CONSTRUCTION AND HEAVY EQUIPMENT IS OUT OF AREA. FURTHER INFORMATION MAY BE OBTAINED FROM THE LAND RESOURCE SPECIALIST AT 582 -4741. UPRIGHT TREE BARRICADES CLEARWATER INDEX No. 909, SH. 1 of 1 Rev. 4/09/03 N.T.S. z 1q c 'V` LT - MULCH 3' FROM TRUNK MULCH 3' DEPTH TILLED AND LOOSENED NATIVE SOIL BACKFILL WATER RING (6' WIDTH & HEIGHT) ePRO LADING A WATER COLLECTION FERTILIZER TABLETS AS SPECIFIED. PLACE UNIFORMLY AROUND ROOT MASS BETWEEN MIDDLE AND BOTTOM OF ROOT MASS. - UNDISTURBED SOIL 2 -2 "X4' STAKE W/LONG TAPER MIN. 18' INTO UNDISTURBED SOIL PINES DRIP LINE ENTIRE DRIP UNE HORIZONTAL UPRIGHT Z W cc 0 C Z 0 iE ZWJ tu � J UJI Z:3z C70oC WHIN U Q Z J CC ¢Lu? m U 0 J a= co = ¢ C:) U) N Z = 0 LL I-VO C7 O O Z cc O aa-z UUJU W UJI ,J 0 0 0 0 N r� co m rn 0 Z m ur (gyp N rn o `o U') / m E -1 m ;G ¢ LL df pt r 0, ui m Lu' m �- i6 ro N i� -, S° N 2 U 1C;) c = G ca c m ° w Z -� U 0 S W U U. U. 0 Z Z ® O� U) _� LL Z W �Q0 Li W W Y. LL ®" U) U_ M LO 'T CAD FILE HARRISON DET LAND REVISIONS SCALE 0 0.5" 1 DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: PROJ. MAN.: JOB NO. DATE: 2008 -02 -27 SHEET NO. 0 r4 / ) M L N 0 J U ® 14' W OJ - i " " 4-a (D ° U 9 -N Itt p ¢ T ® O vJ C) es9 c/i � N ® 0 � -0 70 ai M 0O Z W cc 0 C Z 0 iE ZWJ tu � J UJI Z:3z C70oC WHIN U Q Z J CC ¢Lu? m U 0 J a= co = ¢ C:) U) N Z = 0 LL I-VO C7 O O Z cc O aa-z UUJU W UJI ,J 0 0 0 0 N r� co m rn 0 Z m ur (gyp N rn o `o U') / m E -1 m ;G ¢ LL df pt r 0, ui m Lu' m �- i6 ro N i� -, S° N 2 U 1C;) c = G ca c m ° w Z -� U 0 S W U U. U. 0 Z Z ® O� U) _� LL Z W �Q0 Li W W Y. LL ®" U) U_ M LO 'T CAD FILE HARRISON DET LAND REVISIONS SCALE 0 0.5" 1 DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: PROJ. MAN.: JOB NO. DATE: 2008 -02 -27 SHEET NO. NEH 20 STORY OFFICE SPACE ('5271 SP) NEH MECH EGVIP ROOM (24 5P) NEK 2 STORY OPEN LOBBY qb SP) . ........ ..... .......... ........................... INEH MECH EG#JIP ROOM (24 SPJ ................ ... ........................................ ............. ................................................... .................................................... .......... .......................... .... ......... .......................... ........ ......................... .............. 2 SCALE: I/5" P-0" III> X, X...' x > 77' 7 X, IX > E)05111461 STORY OMICE . .. ... ... yll (5420 SP) SPAC ............ > I.. .. .. ... .. ... wi Ge. NEH MECH EOUIP ROOM I d r P4 (24 SP) ........... .:x < ILOBBY (362 SP) NEK 2 STORY OPEN X, IT x I 77 L IIt x y x ........... ................. ............ .................... ............... I4 ............ . ............ < . ........... NEN EXIT STAIR ADDW ................. I........... .... ......... .................. ......... ..................................................... > .............. Po -I iollk" .............. .............................. .............................. . ....... .................. ::. i*** ..... 1 p ................. ....... .................................................... ------ ................ .......................... ........ ...... < ............ ... ............................ . . . . . . ................ I..................... ................................................... ........................ ...... ....................... . . .............. ................ NEN MECH EGUIP ROOM x10 .. ......................... ... ...................... �** ............... �*.*.*.'.'.*.*.'.*.*.*.*�*.'.*.*.*.'.'�l.'.'.*.*:.,.,.,*: ........... . . ................... .......................... (24 SP) ........................... .................................................... N .............................................. ..................... ................. ....... ......... (jo cn I............................... ................ ................ ... .... .. . . . . ..................... ... INEH MWH ENIF ROOM (24 SP) NEK ELEVATOR (71 SP) —7— 0 I. . . . . . . . . . . m NEK EXIT RAMPA AND 777777 STAIR APPW MO SP) co N SCALE: I/W I'—O" 0 2 2 0 9 6 I ISWE DATE IREVIEW 03/21/08 JH PEFIMIT 03121/011 J14 IREV. IREV. REV. "Ll fREV. .1 "M 000IMM PM&S N07M PPMEM OF FRAM DMISI� W. XV %XL NoT EE REFRWU=, RE-LE" OR COPIED FOR aM PROJIZIS, IN HHOLE OR PART HTIW THE MTTEN WaW OF FRANK FRAZF4 ARCMWT, ALA. ALL RISMS ARE F45ERVW BY THE APZHrIWT IN A"MWE HM US COPM6W AND PAIW LANS UNNITII10RIZED FZVZMTION HLL EE PP456COW To nE FILL DMW OF THE LAOL z L) 0 u PROFE5910NAL SEAL ORA FRAWLIN FP.A=, IV J1 SHEET TI= P1.00IR Pl.AN _R I - :K q 00 "Ll d cq z r-, u 06 ...... ..... �-H 0 aq C) L40 1>1 E 00 4-i Z C) tn '.d . . . . . ............ SHEET TI= P1.00IR Pl.AN _R I - :K TEXTURED STUCCO F71 FINISH (COLOR 04) TEXTURED STUCCO FINISH (COLOR 01) TEXTURED STUIZO FINISH (COLOR 02) Iri'1499 ;: METAL GAP GLASS BLOCK TBD STUGGO GUT LINE lTl'P) TEXTURED STUCCO FINISH STUCCO CUT LINE ENTRY ELEV (COLOR # 1) TEXTURED STUCCO TEXTURED STUCCO FINISH (COLOR 05) FINISH (COLOR #1) - - -- � ---------- STAIR)E7,.EV TW ELEV 244' Ile EXI5TIN6 ROOF .. -------- - -E.EV 214' - - -- �� FLR cLG ELEV 20' -0' TEXTURED STUCCO a Ile ,/ FINISH (COLOR # 3) 2ND FLR FF ELEV 10' -8' ' IST FLR GLG ELEV 9'-4' STUCCO GUT LINE TEXTURED STUCCO r r '! FINISH (COLOR 0 2) EXISTING FF. ELEV 0' -0' FIN GRADE FRONT ELEVATION (NOR SCALE: 118" = I' -O" METAL GAP ELEV 26'-4' STAIR/ELEV TVA --- - - - - -- ELEV 244' EXISTING ROOF 214' - --- 2ND FLR GLG ELEV 20' -0' REAR ELEVATION (SO SCALE: 118" = I' -O" EXISTING FF. -- -- - - -- ELEV 01 -01 "L-'Al GAP 1 11♦ VIVY/i. STREET ELEVATION SCALE: 1 18" = I' -O URED STUCCO H (COLOR #I) EXISTTN6 ROOF - - - -- ELEV 21'-4' 2ND FLR CL6 ELEV 20' -011 URED 5T0GG0 N (COLOR #3) 2ND FLR FF - _ - - - -- ELEV 101,$11 IST FLR GL6 ELEV 9'-4' GO CUT LINE URED STUCCO I-I (COLOR #2) EXISTING F.F. - - - - -- ELEV 0' -0' ISSUE DATE REVIEW 03/21/08 JI-I PERMIT 03/21/08 JH mV. REV. REV. mV. TNESE coati T9, D£SM, NgrES, DETAILS AID 5PWFICATIOfI<I AND CONCEPTS ARE THE SOLE PROFEW OF FRAM DE516N, INC. AW WALL NOT BE REPRODUCED, RE -.W OR COW FOR =11M PRD.F.OTS, IN Y1= OR PART POW TM PR rrEN CONSENT OF MA K FRAM, AW.+P CT, AW ALL RaM ARE FZSEW® BY M ARCNREGT IN ACCOR AWZ PM U9. COPYR09 AND PATENT LAY✓5. WAUINORM REPRODUCTION NU BP MWSEWW TO M FULL WW OF THE LAK U w w W� � �4 42� O 1,4 ~ CA U �Q ORA FRANKLIN FRPZE, IV SIDE ELEVATION (WEST) -J I SCALE: 1/8" = I' -O" * THE PRANINC75 4 DESIGN ARE VALID FOR 12 MONTHS FROM DATE lill OF BEING SEALED. TO THE BEST OF THE IaIOWLEDGE OF THE ARCHITECTS OR ENGINEERS, SAID PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS COMPLY WITH THE APPLICABLE MINIMUM BUILDING CODES AND THE APPLICABLE MINIMUM FIRE SAFETY STANDARDS. ALL DIMENSIONS AND JOB CONDITIONS SHALL BE VERIFIED BY THE CONTRACTOR, ANY AND ALL DISCREPANCIES SHALL BE REPORTED TO THE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF CONSTRUCTION. :;=40011M PWEI/ATIONB LONERED AUM AV&-% 001LOR 4—)\ • 0 -0 KE7AL CAP CiASS ELOC9 r6D STWW = LINE trypi 7EXnRED 57W" FINISH STXW = LIM a4TRY ELPv TEXWw STWXO T Sit= FINISH (cam c5) "L. 154 (COLOR #0 15 --------- TA-IggnLIK -y W EX1511 -22Edi -P • 4tl� 3 -4* VN"5 FIR ao is 70avrAw Snkplw q z c y FOW (C-OUR. 1$ 5) 4 20 FIR Fr- mxv 3004V 41 I 't fLR aD Pil-i EZV W-4' U21 DIA ALUM HAWRAIL- sn= Wr LDrz F195.0 (WWR IW5TIN& F.F. A m" V-01 0 Pro FRONT ELEVATION p- JAW = P-o" REAR ELEVATION )-3EA—LtT1/b11 = 11011 FIN 6RArm. XZTAL UP am- ___ ---------- STAIRMW ELEV 244' ELW 21W 2v ag as d� mxv 20, Z LR Fr- ELEV to V IST FLR CL& T "7- EUV a-V W � ELEVAUON SCALE: 1/5" = P-0q 0 MMJRW sn= FINISH (CCLOR SIDE ELEVATION 1--n- METAL W 1-0 tu a. rR UXVEFM AUK AMrW Talcnhw 57WOW fL'415H (ZOLOR* Tnou;m S7L= P6111611 fc4u)R 0 Y ELEV ENTR A jTA1&4!Qf BEV 244l USTINS ROGF,4. ELEV 21'-4' W ZD FLR CW ELLY 7mm:5w= FN15H (CAXOR ELEV W-W W IST FIR CL6 BW izmmv 5=01 f0NISH ((43ZR # V2" VIA ALUM KANM,11. W52r"Wa XV C449M AM IM 5MI M*M'rf Wr MA=MA MAID 9ikL WrEE NOW ::nm4 WWff Cr FRAM MAM MAIM, Xk AU W—'M AM PMMM BY " AgfoRMT S AUGRUAME NM UA rZPrFWW " PA= WMMM= RMtffZr4N KLL M RUWaAW W rrE M tXI:WCF nE LM u X: z l4wj 0 t-4 rA 0 L4�4- 1-4 cm & u 0 P4 cn r- �A L u u 11 04 u I0;%A MMKUN M!�� JV i C40LOR LWEND yr 0157W OMT& BALL mumwm mxm =mIrlai O&M 01M FKAION Mm 0 - 3x mumom WLOR ==7104 0A=614KARBORWE COWR 04 - mpm mumul*am =OZ WL=Tta4 OAVOW OXAME FIE5TA MIZON mux*m4 M.04 =zInc IN ... ..... ..... . . WlWN mcm amzawy MRW Kuzoam Wm r-Ou.ErITION, PAVIUR ARRMTW RED � ELEVAUON SCALE: 1/5" = P-0q 0 MMJRW sn= FINISH (CCLOR SIDE ELEVATION 1--n- METAL W 1-0 tu a. rR UXVEFM AUK AMrW Talcnhw 57WOW fL'415H (ZOLOR* Tnou;m S7L= P6111611 fc4u)R 0 Y ELEV ENTR A jTA1&4!Qf BEV 244l USTINS ROGF,4. ELEV 21'-4' W ZD FLR CW ELLY 7mm:5w= FN15H (CAXOR ELEV W-W W IST FIR CL6 BW izmmv 5=01 f0NISH ((43ZR # V2" VIA ALUM KANM,11. W52r"Wa XV C449M AM IM 5MI M*M'rf Wr MA=MA MAID 9ikL WrEE NOW ::nm4 WWff Cr FRAM MAM MAIM, Xk AU W—'M AM PMMM BY " AgfoRMT S AUGRUAME NM UA rZPrFWW " PA= WMMM= RMtffZr4N KLL M RUWaAW W rrE M tXI:WCF nE LM u X: z l4wj 0 t-4 rA 0 L4�4- 1-4 cm & u 0 P4 cn r- �A L u u 11 04 u I0;%A MMKUN M!�� JV i yr Yv �i Sz ... ..... ..... . . • J 41 � ELEVAUON SCALE: 1/5" = P-0q 0 MMJRW sn= FINISH (CCLOR SIDE ELEVATION 1--n- METAL W 1-0 tu a. rR UXVEFM AUK AMrW Talcnhw 57WOW fL'415H (ZOLOR* Tnou;m S7L= P6111611 fc4u)R 0 Y ELEV ENTR A jTA1&4!Qf BEV 244l USTINS ROGF,4. ELEV 21'-4' W ZD FLR CW ELLY 7mm:5w= FN15H (CAXOR ELEV W-W W IST FIR CL6 BW izmmv 5=01 f0NISH ((43ZR # V2" VIA ALUM KANM,11. W52r"Wa XV C449M AM IM 5MI M*M'rf Wr MA=MA MAID 9ikL WrEE NOW ::nm4 WWff Cr FRAM MAM MAIM, Xk AU W—'M AM PMMM BY " AgfoRMT S AUGRUAME NM UA rZPrFWW " PA= WMMM= RMtffZr4N KLL M RUWaAW W rrE M tXI:WCF nE LM u X: z l4wj 0 t-4 rA 0 L4�4- 1-4 cm & u 0 P4 cn r- �A L u u 11 04 u I0;%A MMKUN M!�� JV i it �i • it ti SECTION 21, TOWNSHIP 29S, RANGE 15E :2 CERTIFIED T0: 1573, LLC} a' WAYNE C. SEIFRIED,.:: 4 a 50 'c�•. CONCRETE MES INVERT ELEV. =30.09 \ M FOUND 4086 3/8,,/R US p. \ _ _ 33.30 0 \ 33.24 0.65' CO > 5/ { r Ct t Platted WALL NC. 'RETAINING X1. 3357 RETENTION POND EAST BOUNDARY OF WEST 1/2 OF SE 1/4 OF SE 1/4 OF SECTION 'x� .... p 0 \ a \• s, -t- ,.r, 6 °�' / � END 21 -29 -15 \ :�• �9- 2h \ G•_ _ �- OF WALL CONCRETE MES -33.64 UNKNOWry 12 "P VC INVERT ELEV. =29.95 5 - -- 30 S - �?___ 4,3 561g..E L _- D .1d % \S' t` .:: _ `.l .\ I- �_ / ``` __ _ __ VERT ELEV -31 91 / Poi n '' -22 CONCRETE MES / -�--- --- - - - - -- \- / \ ` _ _ °� o / c` \N SOUTHEAST O f \ (� o -- \ ' / . - / 56 CORNER " - - - - -- - - -- --- ____-------- �� - - - -� /� a �r V NdRTH SIDE /d T THE 1 �- \ 1e _ 3 Oe OF F E WEST OF OI n n F) 1 _ - ` 3 -- `? c olrc SE F ST NORTH -- .Q• � _ _ _ I O _ h � OP OF H __ _ _ fr - -c 0 ND 3/8" OF SEC SE +� `. Q' `� y_X'" .X / OOD -FOOT 5 . _ - _ �G _ `32_ y0 6 G ° IR (LS q0 TION 21 _29_ 0 CONC. BOX CULVERT \.:, 4. R ti _ - -`� \` -� �trrE C' �_ _ - -___ - - -- - - -- � as 1 INVERT ELEV =27 87 �` -_ ?s - -- 5�. Z \, `,.. a� ,\ ` a \,. � \`�� p� / 0 I � � � 1 O• '7 �� - _ _ _-_ _ _ _ _ =_`___ � � "� I � '' - INV. =33.22 _---- - - - - - -- -- - -- - -- - -- 34.93 Q PVC : - - _ _ -- ' R 8 "PVC --- - - - --= °yR�= -- - - -- --- - - - - -- - - - - - �0 - -� - -- EAR « Q� d INV. 35.03 a .� CONCRETE MES STREET A ` - �1 - - - - - -� f o 4 :: �t :. SIGN ° SIIDT+I SH6E INVERT ELEV =31.31 ^� - 1 t \ '9 TOP OF DI'[C EL Y,' ,'.SAO \ � _-,_,, �' •y��' / � ^�1 �I ,yy9 i I � ' � - \.' DRIP t J' �'• O.t'.: / LINE / 1 . :�:_.'. .: ',, -`..' _ 1.J, ` ?.`:`....� `.(p':.'��•' a `'� / \ / I 1�. � \\ '/ ' //• ,/. \ It./ II C.B. RETAINING WALL (APPROX 1.5' HIGH) �` "� �-' � �'• .�. : �`:- i90 •t - 1 `� \• poi rl / ;\ ' / I I / j \ `- -- - � i . -. � i DRIP y�,._ Dt , 1 1 LINE ` / / nI - •\ STORM INLET GRATE ELEV. =34.58 t' < `•. 1,� Q _ p. 1 / q� J0 \ N.INV. =32.02 (18 "RCP) ?:.:-- -.. 9sSJ,'••. �F -�i '• ------ S INV. =32.08 (18 "RCP) 1 �� •� cP., /'!'\. Q tx -�A�T\FACE OF p`.L �.,`l. ,ya• / \ 0 i i yNAiLL Q57'W. I�. C� 4 O) o I 38.4 sr - . G' t DRIP 6•' 0 , \' 1a �ti d� LINE e. '� , 'S \ O• 1 1 q) \ -moo U] 37.7 In , QS GANG • t � � \ / x36.5 6S �p 4 H1 WPGG . / ON�R�E- W GR NP `I� O at: ` :: S \ c -g• G` rn• dos 3 5 O t.'(.; ' p 0. G ` �D- :...':::.....:.. :....: '�:'•`.:•';'' t . Vii:- �t�`: :•• % :'..'�': ,- \.`', -::: :� 5 / DRIP LINE � \NG 0 00 .� ..t: .:., % �T :•;' '` ': a-' - J ERG / y` O :s�, .1t v6+ /• `i' 4 �( C.. (�. DRIP / LINE ; .� - �r' IN` Fl.� .•O` �3g WEST FACE OF �� _) ,.::,;r.••:;;;(;:.'::``. ::...:` 7. )..r..'. :::':' : ^:.-e' ":i.'v`' / _ _ WATFE_.�• /"- ��R� \N�SN 15�� t`�• WAL��3.12' E. 9J K/ �':"`.::;:.:: :; �_.,: ....:••.:: ?:::: : -4 - ..METER BPS Q S \::: °';:':: . & \ 3g0 c�� FOUND 3 /8 "IR (LS 4086) "'' - t`, - :•' 1 tr -59"t, OO �kLSO FOUND 5 /8 "IR (NO ID) v....•. nom+ 0 CE / 0.77'N. & 0 64'W. +••'••`� c� O 38� FEN FENCE CORNER �' > >' !�• •O� 03' 0.80S & 0 37'E \: - "�.' ::{ _:.` }' ":�� •'..:,. '::;:; ::::::;;::' � \\::•,v`� off: \, \ ti 1 12 .Q .y ' O� R r �.1,! - - - h :..: ... • : ,� 'tea'.. \ \ �' ti 1111 / - \ 40 PO RNE c1P�l n , 0 y0. CA OD .. -1.` . ..... _ .. _ �: ` .P`PT'r_ 0 1 �`' ,w _"a !IL•.9Q _'""`i" „c, \' Flood Zone X COMMUNITY PANEL #125096 12103C0108H, REVISED 5/17/05 Basis of Bearings: ARE BASED ON THE EAST BOUNDARY OF THE WEST 1/2 OF THE SE 1/4 OF THE SE 1/4 OF SECTION 21 -29 -15 AS BEING S.00 °08'42 "W., PER DESC RIPTION. B enchmark: C LEARWATER BENCHMARK B-06 EL. = 53.14' N.G.V.D., ADJUSTED TO EL. = 52.26' N.A.V.D. M.S.L. = 0.00' FIRE HYDRANT NOTE: This survey is made for the exclusive use of the current owners of the property and also those who purchase, mortgage or guarantee the title thereto within one (1) year from date hereof. NOTE: This survey was prepared without the benefit of a title search and is subject to all easements, rights -of -way and other matters of record. Survey not valid without the signature and the original raised seal of a Florida Licensed Surveyor and Mapper. BC. C E R T I F I C A T 1 0 N JOHN C. BRENDLA AND ASSOCIATES, IN U. CAMPHOR TREE Consulting Engineers and Land Surveyors I hereby certify that the survey represented hereon meets the CONC. requirements of Chapter 61G17 -6, Florida Administrative Code. ID = JOHN C. BRENDLA Florida Surveyor's Registration No. 1269 Certificate of Authorization No. 760 A BOUNDARY SURVEY OF (O.R. BOOK 14115, PAGE 2048) THAT PART OF THE WEST 1/2 OF THE SE 1/4 OF THE SE 1/4 OF SECTION 21, TOWNSHIP 29 SOUTH, RANGE 15 EAST, PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE SE CORNER OF THE NORTH 756.05 FEET OF SAID WEST 1/2 OF SE 1/4 OF SE 1/4 AND RUNNING THENCE SOUTH 0 °8'42" WEST ALONG THE EAST BOUNDARY OF SAID WEST 1/2 OF SE 1/4 140 FEET, THENCE SOUTH 74 °12'9" WEST, 155.86 FEET TO THE NORTHEASTERLY RIGHT - OF -WAY BOUNDARY OF COUNTY HIGHWAY #1 (ALSO HAVING BEEN ORIGINALLY KNOWN AS STATE ROAD 15), THENCE NORTH 32 °36'18" WEST ALONG SAID RIGHT - OF -WAY BOUNDARY 280 FEET, THENCE SOUTH 79 °56'18" EAST 305.9 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. 4015 82nd Avenue North BOUNDARY SURVEY WITH TOPOGRAPHY Pinellas Park, Florida 33781 AND TREE LOCATION Telephone (727) 576 -7546 11�....�/ Facsimile (727) 577 -9932 LB 760 0802-35.0 RD LEGEND: NORTH BASIS: ASSUMED SCALE: 1 " = 20' B. = BRAZILIAN PEPPER TREE BC. = BRAZILIAN TREE CLUSTER � = CENTERLINE C. = CAMPHOR TREE CL . = CHERRY LAUREL TREE CONC. = CONCRETE (D) = DESCRIPTION ID = IDENTIFICATION IR = IRON ROD LB = LICENSED BUSINESS LS = LICENSED SURVEYOR (M) = MEASURED M. = MAGNOLIA TREE MES = MITERED END SECTION O. = OAK TREE (P) = PLAT P. = PALM TREE PVC = POLYVINYL CHLORIDE RCP = REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE SE = SOUTHEAST SH. = SHRUB SHCL. = SHRUB CLUSTER TBM = TEMPORARY BENCHMARK *\ XX.XX = TYPICAL SPOT ELEVATION R E V I S 1 0 N S I No. D E S C R I P T 1 0 N DATE 1. LOCATE OFFSITE TREES & SHOW DRIP LINES. 3/10/08 CO I N (_0 O N d 00 O N 0 .. a_ (D -0 o m E (n U D � z > o z _ M LL --D cn 0 U i FI SECTION 21, TOW IND SHIP 29S, RANGE 15E CERTIFIED T0: 1573, LLC WAYNE C. SEIFRIED CONCRETE MES INVERT ELEV.-30.09 N FOUND \ _ M 3J, (LS 4p 6)IR 65' \ ` <+ • _ \ J3.24 WALL CDNC. RETO AI3rJC REreNrlo Pja t t ecl \ - - s7 N PONb_ BOUNDARY SE i/ ON SE F OF ST 11 OF SECTION I - rn' END of 21 -29 -15 JJ.64 ONXNOWN ALL "IY�12'PVC 4 "P II CONCRETE MES d VC INVERT ELEV.-29.95 QJ ` `, / yy per• -�� _ 1NV. a JQ y "� .ti.• ��sp ' �� , t _ �,•�v '"fir ` - -- 8s' /Al ham^ _ CONCRETE MES 001 I� t -•4 of - - Q. ' ,__- _ 1qq ��..�h!_'�+`v^ `-r �'- 4�VERT ELEV.-31.91 NORTH SIDE 7$6 TNEASr O� +�ep1 a ' �Q' WO- _ — ��` y aQ TOP Of DITCH 1/4 OF FEET OF IyR OFC�ry F N 1 Sr O }/ CONC. BOX CULVERT \ : +� \ 5 •Q ^I _ BRtOA FOpT� J2. yp• - 3- pU SE /4 0 "E 'Sr N RT +• , \ \ ` ti .L _ ` \ - DGE - •• _ ` - - O 3 F S ( O INVERT ELEV.-27.87 \ „ , +. ,� \3 1 y. -,,?3 _" -- _ - _ - __- _ l8 "!R (L ECTIONOF SE `� p ^1r wp' "� _ S 4p86 21-29-1,5 `\ +" t'u \ \ ya• S 6r ay hy. �;sb � .- ocj "�q �`PV ) 44Q kip y ~•+ +1 �0 -�,� /' VV..3 2 Tj _ •11�•'-4' pVC o--- - --- -' - - - - -- -- -- - -,. INl/.. ------------- p. R4.93 8 "PVC \ �� +,. STR q� a INV.-35.03 CONCRETE MES �,. '' E\T INVERT ELEV.m31.31 +i• SIGN �p - 0 - _ yh -117 t , SOUTH SIDE - ` -•-• -» `5 TOP OF DITCH /(� •Q _ � `, , ;S ti ; 19` Rep tv,< �• \ \ w yap: 9 i bQ C.B. RETAINING WALL hQ. r (APPROX 1.5' HIGH) STORM INLET \\ �°` < GRATE ELEV. 34.5$ ` +" C \ ��a i ra N.INV, =32.02 (18 "RCP ' ;`�' 9Cy y {hQ ya S.INV.b32.08 (18 RCP; N\ ly ry a / j ; EAST FACE OF M C U ,ry Q. ya' / 6 WALL 0.57'W. 0 a ,�Q'V'� fah a o to 38.4 -� ;0 ,may 38.4 �CO �`-i p• 51Eps, +`\ 37.7 a a, 36.9 bpdC• '� H10 L ON riETE, ',' Rp1dP 0 Oy(�, � a• 4' L G W 'r C,B• T "v d' 23 �l• ~ O\R • t .ci4\ \ air; O O�A oy. \� �, , NCRE E r� co `ao+. �,\ ys CO - 36.52 O. +P� pc^ iyo 0366 A` 13V�� coot w ? w BIAS o - .NA TER -3; OR �i F�0 7 `.p `J�. WEST FACE OF METER - 'p5 Cj� �,NIS15 ati 9 WALL 3,12' E. CO �d� ;• ••;. + , + +•• \\ &b 39.0 --t FOUND 318 "IR (LS 4086) 39.1 p0 ALSO FOUND 5/8 "IR (NO ID) Ain i„ ° e' �E 0.77'N. & 0.64'W. ''p n O 31}•7 PCN IJI FENCE CORNER x�a Co 39.2 O.BOS. Qa 0.37'E. WpOD. �,7 Or;{,��Q_40 WOOD POWER Q OTIIt�Y �4b1 4•' pO�E OVER��SYptCpt 0 t �� y L1NE5 KQ q0.2� Gpt1CR� �, +S\ �i"��C`� Y A,f•;,''/ \�6 iPz5�':!W AO 7 b`�,i2 0"Yd 6 NCO 1L01NG I �.: . 00 Z + Aq d ��0 Wp4 �p{t1Es) , 4q:3} A\t C�P�' �o°pt o�� ro STORM INLET \ ' +� �2p� 38 L39.8 /�HE1GNt �t�lA�'RxtMpoR �1.. GRATE ELEV.-36.65 P J Ci pp N.INV.-34.22 (18 "RCP) , ',. ��\ P� pp• 4A;s6; 41,0; �5N F S.INV.a34.37 18 "RCP) 1 +; a 3 °° o� \ 'CONCRETE. INI. 1., 1N S.INV. 38.46 (4" CLAY) :• \• ,; ,�' . �F��L ., ,S:SLOf•ELEV: 39:48. ,p�i;�,A�KtttG. �t a ., WdNV. -" 8 :67 (12" PVC)• q e b \\ { vt` ry 4027 k\ \ + 40.69 Flood Zone X COMMUNITY PANEL #125096 12103C0108H, REVISED' 5/17/05 Basis of Bearings: ARE BASED ON THE EAST BOUNDARY OF THE WEST 1/2 OF THE SE 1/4 OF THE SE 1/4 OF SECTION 21 -29 -15 AS BEING S.00 °08'42 "W., PER DESCRIPTION. Benchmark: CLEARWATER BENCHMARK B -06 L. = 53.14' N.G.V.D., ADJUSTED TO EL. = 52.26' N,A.V.D. M.S.L. = 0.00' V .4 r i NORTH BASIS: ASSUMED SCALE: 1" = 20' i A BOUNDARY SURVEY OF (o.R. -BOOK 14115, ' PAGE 2048) THAT PART OF, THE WEST 112 OF THE SE 1/4 OF THE SE 1/4 OF SECTION 21, TOWNSHIP 29 SOUTH, RANGE 15 EAST, PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE SE -CORNER OF THE NORTH 756.05 FEET OF SAID WEST 112 OF SE 1/4 OF SE 1/4 AND RUNNING THENCE SOUTH 0 °8'42" WEST ALONG THE EAST BOUNDARY OF SAID WEST 112 OF SE 1/4 140 FEET, THENCE SOUTH 74 012'9" WEST, 155.86 FEET TO THE NORTHEASTERLY RIGHT - OF —WAY BOUNDARY OF COUNTY HIGHWAY #1 (ALSO HAVING •BEEN ORIGINALLY KNOWN AS'STATE, ROAD' ,15), THENCE NORTH 32 °36'18" WEST ALONG SAID RIGHT - OF —WAY BOUNDARY 280 FEET, ' THENCE SOUTH 79 056'18" EAST 305.9 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, ORMNAL RECUM MAR 03 2000 NOTE: This survey was prepared without the benefit of a title search �lwv�l�Ca ?2TAr�El1 NOTE: This survey is made for the exclusive use of the current and is subject to all easements, rights —of —way and other' matters of��f)E�L��T� owners of the property and also those • who purchase, mortgage or record. Survey not valid 'without the signature and the original raised y guarantee the title thereto within one (1) year from date hereof, seal of a Florida Licensed Surveyor and Mapper. rn C E R T,�� ; I.,,,C A T I 0 N JOHN ' C. BRENDLA AND ASSOCIATES, INC. ' i hereby certify�1� " "tr •�-r'� resented hereon meets fi Consulting g and Land Surveyors No. �,ti requirements ter .�7� -6, T lorida Administrative C e. c\J(o N � N ,I � ®f Gs s ';1 'BOU NDARY SURVEY WITH TOPOGRAPHY L N N �-' -o E ° z > 5 U) O _ -n '011J 4015 82nd Avenue North AND TREE LOCATION Pinellas Park, Florida 33781 = .f '• , 4PI JjQ1 "N %-C:.- ENDLA Telephone (727) 576 -7546 F rids 'rarVeyar's Registration No. 1269 Facsimile (727) 577 -9932 Certif icalti," of Authorization No. 760 LB 760 0802- 35.CR0 LEGEND: C = CENTERLINE C. = CAMPHOR TREE CONC. = CONCRETE (D), = DESCRIPTION ID = IDENTIFICATION IR = IRON ROD LB = LICENSED BUSINESS LS = LICENSED SURVEYOR (M) ='MEASURED M�E``S = MITERED END SECTION 0. = OAK TREE (P) '= PLAT P. = PALM TREE PVC = POLYVINYL CHLORIDE RCP = REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE $E= SOUTHEAST TBM = TEMPORARY BENCHMARK *'-XX.XX = TYPICAL SPOT ELEVATION N Ln rn R,EVIS10NS �o No. DESCRIPTION r � c\J(o N � N (i) CL cn Do m- L N N �-' -o E ° z > 5 U) O `.8 -n '011J M F R,EVIS10NS �o No. DESCRIPTION DATE � c\J(o N � N CL cn Do m- L N N �-' -o E ° z > 5 U) Cf) m ° z Y o v F