The URL can be used to link to this page

FLD2008-02002 (8)FLD2008 -02002 1590 GULF BLVD BE LEVIEW BILTMORE CABANA ILU PLANNER OF RECORD: WW ATLAS # 311A ZONING: C LAND USE: CG RECEIVED: 02/01/2008 INCOMPLETE: COMPLETE: MAPS: PHOTOS: STAFF REPORT: DRC : CDB: CLWCoverSheet RECEIVED SEP 10 2008 RARDERT, STEELE, BOLE & REYNOLDS, P.A. ATTORNEYS AT LAW CITY ATTORNEY GEORGE K. RAHDERT ALISON M. STEELE BRADLEYM. BOLE THOMAS E. REYNOLDS LAYLA K. McDONALD THE ALEXANDER BUILDING 535 CENTRAL AVENUE ST. PETERSBURG, FLORIDA 33701 -3703 September 9, 2008 TELEPHONE: (727) 823 -4191 FACSIMILE: (727) 823 -6189 LESLIE DOUGALL- SIDES, ESQUIRE GINA GRIMES, ESQUIRE Assistant City Attorney Attorney for Clearwater CDB CITY OF CLEARWATER Hill, Ward & Henderson, P.A. 112 S. Osceola Avenue 101 East Kennedy Blvd., Suite 3700 Clearwater, FL 33756 Tampa, FL 33602 RE: CABANA CLUB CITY OF CLEARWATER CASE NO. FLD 2008 -02002 Dear Ms. Dougall -Sides and Ms. Grimes: I am writing to you on behalf of my client, Legg Mason Real Estate Investors, Inc. ( "Legg Mason "), which has a Flexible Development Application pending before the Community Development Board ( "CDB "). The hearing is currently scheduled for the September 16, 2008, CDB meetinrn T Infnr iwnately these ]in }peen ciµhQtwntlal m;c;nfnrrnatinn riroiilating ahrnit ..g. > > various aspects of the development proposal. Accordingly, I would like to provide you with an exhibit and factual information to clarify what Legg Mason actually proposes to do. . I have enclosed an exhibit prepared by Florida Design Consultants which has been color coded to highlight certain aspects of the site map to assist you in your review. The enclosed exhibit is based on the survey (without the color coding) that has previously been submitted to the Planning Department as part of our official Flexible Development Application. The property is located on Sand Key and fronts the Gulf of Mexico, which means that the site is subject to both the Coastal Construction Control Line ( "CCCL ") and the Erosion Control Line ( "ECL ") requirements, as well as the City's zoning regulations. Since the CCCL and ECL are not found in all areas of the City, I believe it is important that, prior to the CDB hearing, I summarize the effect of these regulations on the site. The overall size of the site is 1.38 acres. The western edge of the property is shown in the color purple on the exhibit. However, it should be noted that only the eastern 0.96 acres is zoned Commercial, with the balance of the property being zoned a combination of the Open Space/ Recreation and Preservation zoning districts. The City has previously determined that the Com- mercial zoning district line is coterminous with the CCCL (see attached letter from Planning Director, Michael Delk, dated April 24, 2008). The CCCL is shown in the color red, and all permanent improvements, including the proposed hotel, parking, pool, and deck, are located east of the CCCL and wholly within the portion of the property zoned Commercial. .1�p I LESLIE DOUGALL- SIDES, ESQUIRE GINA GRIMES, ESQUIRE September 9, 2008 Page 3 RE: CABANA CLUB CITY OF CLEARWATER CASE NO. FLD 2008 -02002 There also appears to be some misunderstanding about the proposed temporary cabanas. Legg Mason has proposed to locate temporary canvas cabanas on its property in a landscaped area beginning at the CCCL and continuing west for a maximum width of twenty -five (25) feet. The canvas cabanas are each ten (10) feet by ten (10) feet in size. The purpose of cabanas is to provide shade for hotel guests while they enjoy the beach. Although it was previously Legg Mason's intention to install concrete sleeves for the cabanas and leave them up overnight, input from the public and staff has caused us to revisit this issue. We will therefore make a request at the CDB Meeting to amend the Application to (i) delete the concrete sleeves, and (ii) agree to take the cabanas in every night (or earlier if required by inclement weather). It is critical to note that there are no permanent structures proposed to be located in this landscaped area. The only items that will be placed in this landscaped area are the above - described temporary cabanas, grass and trees. It is also important to note that this landscaped area is wholly located landward of the ECL and totally within the developer's property. Since the landscaped area is located landward of the ECL, by definition, the landscaped area is not located on the public beach. In addition, the trees in the landscaped area have been located out- side of the Perpetual Pedestrian Easement so that there is no perceived or actual interference with public access in the easement. In summary, Legg Mason and its consultants have always been cognizant of the various City, County and State regulations that affect the site and have designed the project to be con- sistent with those regulations. The plans on file with the City demonstrate that all permanent improvements are completely located within the owner's private property. The project does not propose, and has never proposed, any improvements (temporary or permanent) upon the public beach. I thank you for your review of these materials. If you would like to discuss any of these issues, please do not hesitate to contact me. TER/kms Enclosure xc (w /encl): Wayne Wells, City of Clearwater Planning Department Joseph Penner, Legg Mason Real Estate Investors, Inc. Richard Heisenbottle, R.J. Heisenbottle Architects, P.A. Cyndi Tarapani (w /o encl.) CABANA CLUB SITE PLAN APPLICATION Presented to: CITY OF CLEARWATER COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD Prepared for: LEGG MASON REAL ESTATE INVESTORS 10880 Wilshire Boulevard Suite 1750 Los Angeles, California 90024 Prepared by: R.J. HEISENBOTTLE ARCHITECTS, P.A. RAHDERT, STEELE, BOLE AND REYNOLDS, P.A. FLORIDA DESIGN CONSULTANTS, INC. WALLACE ROBERTS TODD TIM HAAHS ENGINEERS ARCHITECTS September 16, 2008 CABANA CLUB SITE PLAN APPLICATION Presented to: CITY OF CLEARWATER COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD Prepared for: LEGG MASON REAL ESTATE INVESTORS 10880 Wilshire Boulevard Suite 1750 Los Angeles, California 90024 Prepared by: R.J. HEISENBOTTLE ARCHITECTS, P.A. RAHDERT, STEELE, BOLE AND REYNOLDS, P.A. FLORIDA DESIGN. CONSULTANTS, INC. WALLACE ROBERTS TODD TIM HAAHS ENGINEERS ARCHITECTS September 16, 2008 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 i 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 CABANA CLUB SITE PLAN APPLICATION TABLE OF CONTENTS I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND DESIGN Site Plan East Elevation Rendering West Elevation Rendering East Elevation West Elevation North and South Elevations Aerial Photograph of Site and Vicinity Belleview Cabana Club Zoning Districts on Site All exhibits listed above prepared by R.J. Heisenbottle Architects, P.A. II. ENGINEERING SUMMARY Civil Site Plan, prepared by Florida Design Consultants. III. HOTEL'S EFFECT ON PROPERTY VALUES Real Property Appraisal Consulting Report on Cabana Club Property, prepared by Nicholas Clarizio, MAI, SRA, August 7, 2008. IV. TRAFFIC ANALYSIS City of Clearwater Beach Area Traffic Study, prepared by DKS Associates, February, 2008. Belleview Biltmore Cabana Club Traffic Study, prepared by Roy E. Chapman, P.E., Florida Design Consultants, July 24, 2008. 1 1 C C V. PARKING ANALYSIS Parking Demand Study, prepared by Vicky Gagliano, Tim Haahs Engineers Architects, August 5, 2008. VI. PLANNING ANALYSIS Sand Key Future Land Use Map Sand Key Zoning Districts Sand Key Condominium Homestead Analysis Sand Key Building Analysis Map and Summary Table George Mitrovich Letter summarizing vote of Cabana Club Condominium Survey of Sand Key Building Heights I Survey of Sand Key Building Heights Summary Table Survey of Sand Key Building Heights II Sand Key Building Height Comparison Chart Building Height in Immediate Vicinity Summary of Units with View Amenity Impact (All exhibits above prepared by Florida Design Consultants.) Letter from Nicole Elko, Ph.D., Pinellas County Coastal Coordinator, regarding Sand Key Beach Nourishment Program, September 9, 2008. VII. RESUMES OF EXPERT WITNESSES ARCHITECT Richard J. Heisenbottle, FAIR, President R.J. Heisenbottle Architects, P.A. LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT Gerald Marston, FASLA, Principal Wallace Roberts Todd CIVIL ENGINEER Edward Mazur, Jr., P.E. President/ CEO Florida Design Consultants TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER Roy Chapman, P.E., Vice President, Transportation Florida Design Consultants PARKING CONSULTANT Vicky M. Gagliano Tim Haahs Engineers Architects PLANNING Cynthia H. Tarapani, Vice President, Planning Florida Design Consultants 1 r D fD a ti ty C r ara � C7 m r m= m m = == w= m m m m m r m m BELLEVIEW BILTMORE CABANA CLUB 1590 CAN BmkA d Ckwoater, Florida SCHEMATIC DESIGN IULY 14, 2008 PROPOSED N BEACH FRONT HOTEL (D SCALP VW - T-0• !\ HEI5ENBUTTLE •, C M. i l t 1 1 2199 PONCE DE LEON BLVD _ SUITE 400 CORAL GABLES. FL 3. 134 TELEPHONE: 305 /446 -7aB FAX 305 /446 -9275 FLORIDA RE7STRAT10N NUMBER: AR 00IONS p Wallace Roberts & Todd, LLC ro, GvYG bamia Pprtgns xs4wOm Ca C.,W a Ft 33131 m m s= m= m= m w m= m w m= m m= . r . 1 ;aM_= L E - � � I _ tr F l IAL r�`�- ,�•. i -. _. � wrl � i' it i - I �, y �'� �_' 1 rr 1 n n;111 ` ❑ it lm tr nr , :;.� c I � - ' .. ` -III, III hill, 111 ,Pw � �t 6oc._u. .s .. �a • -- -:,�c :.ak >-._ F .sf.:•...s• .. ,t„by;c1' s.''""r %^ "` a = a 9t g� ho a'�, k`9 �,y�4 :� �� `y'� '"r3^' ,ci•i�+.ia.:��xs :: urk .�_.:>+.'.T�fs��a- ..c:::�.�1. z$ *t �sF`Nd4kr,..- 3�-•.- �./ -r'.�....,_- .rt.a_ R H= ISE[- DO��LE 2199 PONCE 1E L0M E VD., SUFT 400 CORM GAA-0 EL 33134 TELEPIO&E 3G5/7 -1F -7799 'tiX 305•/46-4:75 3C37, REGISTRrION NW3ER: M 0610865 Cam EAS- ELEVATION RENDERING BR EVIEW BILTMORE CABANA CLUB - _ 9c Gul Boulevarc Clearwater, Florida 'CHEMATIC DESIGN JULY 1•, 2008 PFh_-PCSED BEA.GH F=Kr -T HOTEL REFDE Iv! A —f 00 EI.c f EISENBOTTL 21!9 Fr1 -:E DE LEON BLVD., SUIE 43C TORO_ GABLES, FL 33134 rEif HQN =: 305/446 -7799 FA}: 3D'/-M6—Q75 FLORIDA REGISTR--10N 4UMB3t: AR 0010865 or-ort 0 a u ,va,earnc u,wrzcrs �. WEST ELEVATIC N RENDERING BELLEVIEW 31LTMORE CABANA CLUB 1590 Gulf Coulevard = learwater, Florida SCHEMATIC DESIGN JULY 14, 2008 PRCFC�3ED BEA :H F 9, 31T HC T-L REN:: t 1G A -3 C1 BELLEVIEW BILTMORE CABANA CLUB 1590 Gulf Boulevard Clearwater, Florida SCHEMATIC DESIGN JULY 14, 2008 PANT /001.01R LEGEND Syma O1 3171N VALUAKS PANT — SNINO DANODS *11E SIERMI WLLI S PAN( — MW MINT CLUB OS OTENS POf WO AWNN.T MME — CNATEAU OREM { 1DRAOORA W" — WANRAL COLOR EL o•-o- - -- R j HEISENBOTTLE 2199 PONCE DE LEON BLVD.. SUITE 400 CORAL GABLES, FL 33134 TELEPHONE: 305/446 -7799 FAX: 305/446 -9275 FLORIDA REGISTRATION NUMBER: AR 0010865 EAST ELEVATION PROPOSED BEACH FRONT HOTEL ELEVATIONS SCM-e 3/32• - T-V A -6.06 m ■ m 11111 ■ ■ 11111 110 m 110 m ■ ■ m 111111 11110 m 11111 ■ • • • .. it It■ 1 1■ 1■ ,u ii 1 ■ ■�i 1■ 1 =1I ■1 1�1N 1■ WINES LOA rm-i 1101011mi Ell MIN No ®® ( m e f� ■ alt ■ ■ I� t A Mai ME ■ c � ■ MII ■ !1 ■1 ■1 ■1 ■ MINES! IN 111 0 on =tom,ut �ti� Mal - ®:® M■ aal ■■ i ■MI M■ ■■I � :�: �■■ [1�t��ti� ' [Ill 1� �EI �� . � . +.:. �.:�s.� .. � _ r , 111 ■ ■1� 1■ PAM/COIAFt LEGEND SYI■4 tO 9ERM1 WUYS PANT - Sq Np 1111NWS 1'Iiffi O2 9fItYN YlLAYS PANE - SMMl. NJNT 3LB GCIlf10 A9 FW.T 4113E - QUIEAU GEDi { TONAOOITA AUIX - HAIIIAAL WIA • • • .. it It■ 1 1■ 1■ ,u ii 1 ■ ■�i 1■ 1 =1I ■1 1�1N 1■ WINES LOA rm-i 1101011mi Ell MIN No ®® ( m e f� ■ alt ■ ■ I� t A Mai ME ■ c � ■ MII ■ !1 ■1 ■1 ■1 ■ MINES! IN 111 0 on =tom,ut �ti� Mal - ®:® M■ aal ■■ i ■MI M■ ■■I � :�: �■■ [1�t��ti� ' [Ill 1� �EI �� . � . +.:. �.:�s.� .. � _ r , 111 ■ ■1� 1■ PAM/COIAFt LEGEND SYI■4 tO 9ERM1 WUYS PANT - Sq Np 1111NWS 1'Iiffi O2 9fItYN YlLAYS PANE - SMMl. NJNT 3LB GCIlf10 A9 -K BELLEVIEW BILTMC CABANA CLUB 1590 Gulf Boulevard Clearwater, Fli.r SCHEMATIC DESIGN JULY 14, 2006 BEACH NO-TrH ELE ATIOA Rj HEISENBOTTLE 2199 PONCE DE LEON BLVD., SUITE 400 CORAL GABLES, FL 33134 TELEPHONE: 305/446 -7799 FFX: 305/446 -9275 FLORIDA REGISTRAI001 NUMBER: AR 0010665 oaRr- ziar0 �+ N= 1 10TEL SURFACE PARKING PROPO=D EEACH FRC7jF HOTEL ELEVA70NS SCALE: 3/- - T-V A -6: )3 a \�- ��" Elm�.� c • at�P1TJ yj [III i ■ ■ N= 1 10TEL SURFACE PARKING PROPO=D EEACH FRC7jF HOTEL ELEVA70NS SCALE: 3/- - T-V A -6: )3 • A p. The ' arb`o 4 F, So k J` T• �\ 1 1 sal ltslem ' 1 � FIJeo • .�" rf w` 9 , h >> FLI r r r Will Y/ OSR Preservation / Open Space /Recreation ® / Proposed Structures: No Structures Pavers, Canvas Cabanas Gulf of Mexico ?l/ 1 r s� Commercial Proposed Structures: Hotel, Pool, Deck, Parking / Public Access Easements Dan's Island Condominium °c .O1b 4, Belleview Cabana Club Zoning Districts I 0 vc 0 A A QQ C A7 "S = = = = = m w = = m m = = m = w = = = I 4F ECL BPA J. PG 14 �� , y�'J/� ,.,' j,'(j ��\ 1 wrn.[M ,' / Ar 42 J, ='I", L i FLORIDA DESIGN CONSULTANTS, INC. I PLAM&R-- e` / 0 LEGEND L+a°v s,w B..wr = m mr �,. - m -i nan,-/ 0 —N y ..,,. °MnT.o xnwiwaAE.aw / _. �Y • r� FLORIDA DESIGN CONSULTANTS, INC. I PLAM&R-- DRAINAGE Ut1TENIA f,' I. iREAIYFNi - 1HE FIRST OIE -HALF WCH (0.5') OF RUNOFF. BECAUSE _ IY c DISCHARGE TO WISTE FIRS THRIDA WATER (OFWj, N(0. ISOx iREAIY . ' 1NEFEFCRE TREAT THE FIRST THREE- WARIFAS INCH (O.TS) 6 RUNOFF. aEV. a.5 BFV. as 3. ATIENUAIMN -WE REWRW. E EBS APP N t t, MO.TlLSmc mAOE •a t SECP B SECTION C LZ } i.AA °_'' u,xwu eo1H W, EEE -7.20 Ff �ry / IF p ±i �/ � . / � / r �`` � T �, _ 0 / \\ ��Y :,' ;� � gam"' //� E ,r rj' • Al / I r P;o 4 .Fl A, ah �•/ a. uss NAr r !� I l r✓ I I iSEF $MET t -9 foe OETAA) : L -• »ham �/ u /ttESS LEGEND E A E�VWS Of UPPER FLOORS UN BE OEFBVEO FROM ® ,��. //' Cy/ .✓ • -• �'.• S '�P ^115pa1 Ow01bn THE INfORNATON PRONGED ON A TEOIURAL PAN °"p`�'BOa'- m'�p°v1 °�ftp1p'H''p' �. .,^E•` ^ .f f•^ jM¢ . MYPI On,u« E S.EET A -e. Fm,mcrczwAnwsmwuma,rw ¢ wvl zG'a, 1 /� - -I m<o�p) A ,L• / / :j'N ' 4 ,:' . F+MHB SF.I O«rOw� Y 5.. :— y maumow Rawnsmn ww aww m J g d' /' ~I , / , ueuy p It g r mw PNZ ; ® SEAW -- AWWALL NOTE S: /`. , ...iiA/ 1. ALL REPAIR WCAR SUBJECT N FDEP PERLBETNG AS ..nrwr evvul vVnc,®.mRPPEm.NAC . m ty'ue ' ' BELL AS, ANY OTHER PERMITTING REWIRED. _ V - umA, s, Pa«n,m 0«tvevan]llpaa 2. CONTRACTOR TO INCLUDE THE ENGINEER OF A S / ni FXINDA RIND ERED PROFESSIONAL WING P LL CONS TO OF9GH, SEAWALL N1AP D F7,11 SPAR AND CERRET RETAINING ML WAIL GON9IRUCTEN, rc .� /A/ O • �,w of AS PART OF WE RETAINING WALL COSTS fAftMFO fRR, E 8 �• ...��"... iOESCW,rNw ,a•. / �MeA @wne.Vm A'us Pa eOC CBCm [:Sldrs> A FLORmA DESIGN CONSULTANTS, INC. R.J. HEISENSOTTLE ARCHITECTS, P,A, BELLEVIEW BILTMDRE CABANA CLUB — wnwu�'.'.�w,. ENONEERS, ENVIRONMENTALISTS, SURVEYORS 0 PLAAHERS 2199 PENCE DE LEON BWLEVARD, 91RE 100 SITE PLAN Amy nwula Mc �uR '� C -4 .wlen,.fi iF'�FA"w COR.LL GABLES, ROROA JJIJI PXWE DO} AM- RM 03' m maOMa ( J 99 PAA(X})116 -02]5 PAVING, GRADING &DRAINAGE PLAN Wa aRm5515 E.B. N 7421 ® m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m N �`� i/ \ -�� •� Via, '� '� #'a� 'r � v � � r. 'T r �i 1r r Plc N, r , '� /•',1r �'•' n n I �� wasc i s¢ onAa nn 9asr ILL ------- _- �' a •, 3 .., 6 _. - _ - N,Ti -• —_s bi '• •A050.vILE 01 1, '.."'° P I 1 , .,, _ .. 7 y, ..o ;•' • _ -- - - j� nom. W,S1dCRM1111G 0� ,10 u men 7 . o i. as yr � (, ? - .N^ � �vM�..wl. w.. vw ` ``\ ' /�,•` N ONE 21 1 IV // .i Lr .c w,wMMI � . ,,,,o. 9r.,.P°.� A� . "''`w ��•,. "s A DETAIL a e..� ...........,.... 7RV.ReR F7R. MEEr 9ESwnoN. FLORMA DESIGN CONSULTANTS, INC. R.J. HEISENBOTTLE ARCHITECTS, PA - - -- z5A BELLEVIEW BILTMORE CABANA CLUB ENGINEERS, ENVIRONMENTALISTS, SURVEYORS 0 PLANNERS 2199 P.m OE LEON DOUtEv.D, SUIT Mb SITE PLAN •�3 C -6 CORpL GADlES, FLOROA 3313a .In>j w- w PHONE (303) M 7709 FAX: (J ) K6 -9275 unuTY PLAN E.S. Ne. 7423 III. Hotel's Effect on Property Values -1 'II ' REAL PROPERTY APPRAISAL CONSULTING REPORT WRITTEN IN SUMMARY FORMAT ON CABANA CLUB PROPERTY PREPARED FOR MR. THOMAS E. REYNOLDS, ESQUIRE RAHDERT, STEELE, BOLE AND REYNOLDS 535 CENTRAL AVENUE ST. PETERSBURG, FLORIDA 33701 AS OF AUGUST 7, 2008 NICHOLAS A. CLARIZIO, MAI, SRA STATE - CERTIFIED GENERAL APPRAISER LICENSE NUMBER RZ202 N. A. CLARIZIO AND ASSOCIATES, INC. 28471 U. S. HIGHWAY 19 NORTH, SUITE 504 CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33761 FILE NUMBER 08 -916 r �� N.A. CIAWWO and ASSOCIATES, INC. 'i N.A. CLARIZIO and ASSOCIATES, INC. REAL ESTATE APPRAISERS - CONSULTANTS �j28471 U.S. HIGHWAY 19 NORTH, SUITE 504 CLEARWATER, FL 33761 PHONE (727) 726 -9566 1' August 11, 2008 Mr. Thomas E. Reynolds, Esquire Randert, Steele, Bole and Reynolds 535 Central Avenue St. Petersburg, Florida 33701 Re: Cabana Club Dear Mr. Reynolds, P. O. Box 6161 CLEARWATER, FL 33758 FAx (727) 791 -0366 Pursuant to your request, I have prepared a real property appraisal consulting assignment on the above referenced property. I have made a personal inspection of the area and have conducted the necessary research in order to provide you with a consulting opinion as of the date of valuation. The report is written in summary format and my work files are an integral part of this valuation and are hereby incorporated by reference. ' The purpose of the consulting assignment was to study a number of factors. The first analysis was to determine if the change in use from a restaurant to a boutique hotel ' would have any affect on property values for the condominium uses in the area. The next section of the study was to determine if a thirty -eight room boutique hotel were to be built per the current plans and specifications what impact would the building have on the surrounding properties. The function of this report is understood to be for your use in future negotiations with the City of Clearwater permitting officials. Opinions and conclusions were developed and this report has been prepared in conformity with Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice, Standard 5; and the Code of Ethics of the Appraisal Institute. The report is intended for the use of Mr. Reynolds and his representatives or assignees. The date of this report is August 11, 2008; the effective date of the analysis is August 7, 2008. As a result of my investigation and analysis described in the body of this report, my consulting opinion is that the change in use from a restaurant with a rooftop lounge ' to a boutique hotel will not impact property values in the general market area. It is also my opinion that a number of unit's views of the Gulf of Mexico may be impacted by the r development of the boutique hotel. These units are located in the Harbour South Condominium and in the Isle of Sand Key Condominium. CONSULTANTS ❑ EXPERT WITNESS Cl EMINENT DOMAIN APPRAISALS { It is my opinion that the change in use from a restaurant with a rooftop lounge to a six - story boutique hotel will not have an unfavorable affect on the market area. However, based on the analysis within this report, it is my opinion that the partial diminution in value to the fifteen affected units due to the proposed hotel and the subsequent loss of the view amenity of the Gulf of Mexico would be in the range of 5% to 10 %. The impacted units would be the southern two most units in the Harbour South building on floors three thru six, southernmost unit on floor seven, and the units in the northwest corner of Isle of Sand Key on floors four thru nine. The technique utilized within this analysis is a paired sales analysis. A paired sales analysis may be defined as a quantitative technique used to identify and measure adjustments to the sale prices of comparable properties; to apply this technique; sales of reasonably comparable properties are analyzed to isolate a single characteristic's effect on value. In the first section of this assignment, the single characteristic will be condominiums adjacent to or within close proximity to freestanding restaurants versus condominiums adjacent to or within close proximity to motels or hotels. In the second section of this analysis, the characteristic will be the loss of the view of the Gulf of Mexico. It is important to note that this is the letter of transmittal of a real property appraisal consulting report. The appraisal consulting report is attached hereto. Respectfully, State - Certified General Appraiser License Number RZ202 �l N.A. CLARMO and ASSOCIATES, INC. 1 n i I Subject Cover Sheet Letter of Transmittal Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS PART 1— INTRODUCTION Page No. Summary of Important Facts and Conclusions ........... ..............................2 Special Assumptions and Extraordinary Conditions .... ..............................2 Certificate of Valuation ................................................ ..............................3 Identification of the Subject Property ........................... ..............................5 Purpose and Intended Use of the Appraisal Consulting Report ................5 Definition of Market Value ........................................... ..............................5 PropertyRights Studied .............................................. ..............................5 CompetencyStatement ............................................... ..............................6 Apparent Owner of Record ......................................... ..............................6 Dateof Valuation ......................................................... ..............................6 Scope of the Consulting Assignment .......................... ..............................6 Professional Assistance .............................................. ..............................7 Client........................................................................... ..............................7 IntendedUsers ............................................................ ..............................7 LocationMap ............................................................... ..............................8 PART II — DESCRIPTION, ANALYSIS AND CONCLUSIONS ExposureTime ........................................................... .............................10 Description of the Site (Cabana Club) ........................ .............................11 Environmental Disclaimer .......................................... .............................11 Zoning........................................................................ .............................12 Improvements............................................................ .............................12 TheAnalytical Process ............................................... .............................12 Analysis...................................................................... .............................13 CostApproach .......................................................... .............................18 Income Capitalization Approach ................................. .............................18 Reconciliation and Final Conclusion ......................... .............................19 Assumptions and Limiting Conditions ........................ .............................20 N.A. CLAMMO and ASSOCIATES, INC. i f Architectural Drawings Qualifications 1 'j TABLE OF CONTENTS (Cont.) PART III — ADDENDA ' I� N.A. CI AWZIO ands ASSOCIATES, INC. D PART I - INTRODUCTION N.A. CLA=IO and ASSOCIATES, INC. 'I ,I 1� SUMMARY OF IMPORTANT FACTS AND CONCLUSIONS Location of Cabana Club Owner of Record: Market Area: Report Type: Report Format: Property Appraisers Number: Date of the Value 1590 Gulf Boulevard Belleview Biltmore, LLC (Leasehold) Sand Key Real Property Appraisal Consulting Summary 19/29/15/00000/340 /0110 (Cabana Club) August 7, 2008 Date of the Report: August 11, 2008 Improvement Data: The present development is a restaurant with a rooftop lounge. The proposed development is a thirty -eight room boutique hotel and accessory restaurant. Zoning: The location of the proposed boutique hotel is zoned commercial the surrounding properties are zoned high density residential. Conclusions: The change in use from a restaurant with a rooftop lounge to a six story boutique hotel will not have an unfavorable impact on the surrounding properties. However, the height of the proposed boutique hotel will have a view amenity impact on fifteen units within the Harbour South condominium and the Isle of Sand Key condominium Appraiser: Nicholas A. Clarizio, MAI, SRA State - Certified General Appraiser License Number RZ202 Special Assumptions and Extraordinary Conditions: The appraiser reserves the right to update this report and make appropriate adjustments to the value conclusions if additional data becomes available. Within this report I have relied upon data supplied by Mrs. Cyndi Tarapani of Florida Design Consultants and Mr. Richard J. Heisenbottle of R. J. Heisenbottle Architects. 2 N.A. CI AMZIO and ASSOCIATES, INC. CERTIFICATE OF VALUATION This is to certify that 1 have personally inspected and analyzed various data and have completed an appraisal consulting assignment on the property described here within. I certify, to the best of my knowledge and belief: The statements of fact contained in this report are true and correct. The reported analyses, opinions and conclusions are limited only by the reported assumptions and limiting conditions and is my personal, impartial, unbiased professional analyses, opinions and conclusions and recommendations. I have no present or prospective interest in the property that is the subject of this report, and I have no personal interest or bias with respect to the parties involved. My compensation for completing this assignment is not contingent upon the reporting of a predetermined value or direction in value that favors the cause of the client, the amount of the value opinions, the attainment of a stipulated result, or the occurrence of a subsequent event directly related to the intended use of this appraisal consulting assignment; nor was the appraisal assignment based on a requested minimum valuation, a specific valuation or the approval of a loan. I have made a personal inspection of the exterior of the properties considered within this report. My engagement in this assignment was not contingent upon developing or reporting predetermined results. Michael L. Sullivan, SRA State - Certified General Appraiser license number RZ820, provided significant professional assistance to the person signing this report in the research and verifications of the sales considered here within. I have relied upon computations made by Mr. Richard J. Heisenbottle of R. J. Heisenbottle Architects and Mrs. Cyndi Tarapani Vice President of Florida Design Consultants. The use of this report is subject to the requirements of the Appraisal Institute relating to review by its duly authorized representatives. My analyses, opinions and conclusions were developed, and this report has been prepared in conformity with the requirements of the Code of Professional Ethics of the Appraisal Institute and the Uniform Standards of Professional Practice and State of Florida for State - Certified Appraisers. The report is written in summary format and was prepared in accordance with Standard 5 of the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice. My work files are an integral part of this valuation and are hereby incorporated by reference. 3 N.A. CL RIZIO and ASSOCIATES, INC. D r CERTIFICATE OF VALUATION (Cont.) The use of this report is subject to the requirements of the State of Florida relating to review by the . Real Estate Appraisal Sub - Committee of the Florida Real Estate Commission and to the Appraisal Institute relating to review by its duly authorized representatives. The Appraisal Institute conducts a voluntary program of continuing education for its designated members. MAI's and SRA's who meet the minimum standard of this program are awarded periodic educational certification. As of the date of this report, Nicholas A. Clarizio, MAI, SRA, has completed the requirements under the continuing education program of the Appraisal Institute. I do not authorize the out -of- context quoting from or partial reprinting of this appraisal consulting report. Further, neither all nor any part of this appraisal consulting report shall be disseminated to the general public by the use of media for public communication without the prior written consent of the appraiser signing this appraisal consulting report. No one, other than the undersigned, prepared the analysis, conclusions and opinions concerning real estate that are set forth in this appraisal consulting report. It is my opinion that the change in use from a restaurant with a rooftop lounge to a six story, 38 -room boutique hotel will not have an unfavorable affect on the market area. The height of the proposed structure may have a negative or unfavorable impact on the view from the two southerly most units in the Harbour South Condominium and in the northwest units in the Isle of Sand Key condominium. The specific floors within each will be expanded upon within this report. License Number RZ202 �I 4 N.A. CLAWZIO and ASSOCIATES, INC. IDENTIFICATION OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY The location of the proposed six -story boutique hotel is 1590 Gulf Boulevard, Clearwater Florida. The site, existing improvements and proposed improvements are further described within their respective sections of this report. 1` PURPOSE AND INTENDED USE OF THE APPRAISAL CONSULTING REPORT ' The purpose of this appraisal consulting report is to study the uses surrounding condominiums within close proximity to restaurant uses, motels, hotels and other commercial uses. The report will also study the impact on condominiums with views of the Gulf of Mexico and without such views. The report is prepared for Mr. Thomas E. Reynolds, Esquire. The report may possibly be used as part of Mr. Reynolds presentation to the City of Clearwater for possible zoning uses or variances. DEFINITION OF MARKET VALUE '! The most probable price which a property should bring in a competitive and open market under all conditions requisite to a fair sale, the buyer and seller, each acting prudently, knowledgeably and assuming the price is not affected by undue stimulus. Implicit in this definition is consummation of a sale as of a specified date and passing the title from seller to buyer under conditions whereby: • Buyer and seller are typically motivated; • Both parties are well informed or well advised and each acting in what he considers his own best interest; • A reasonable time is allowed for exposure in the open market; • Payment is made in terms of cash in U.S. dollars or in terms of financial arrangements comparable thereto; The price represents the normal consideration for the property sold unaffected by special or creative funding or sales concessions granted by anyone associated with the sale. PROPERTY RIGHTS STUDIED The property rights studied is the fee simple interest as of August 7, 2008. It is �. assumed that title to the properties studied is good and marketable. All rights and benefits inherent in and attributable to the property are included in the consulting �j assignment. 1 5 N.A. CIAWZIO and ASSOCIATES, INC. 1, L COMPETENCY STATEMENT I have significant experience studying similar issues to meet the competency requirements of Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice. APPARENT OWNER OF RECORD Per information supplied by Mr. Reynolds, Legg Mason Real Estate Investors, Inc., the new owners of Belleview Biltmore Hotel property, holds a long term lease on the Cabana Club property which is the focus of this report. DATE OF VALUATION The effective date of the appraisal is August 7, 2008. The date of inspection was August 7, 2008 and numerous previous and subsequent dates. SCOPE OF THE CONSULTING ASSIGNMENT The terminology "Scope of the Work" means the extent of the process of collecting, confirming, and reporting the data. Standards of real property appraisal consulting impose a responsibility on the appraiser to determine the extent of the work of the report, in relation to the significance of the appraisal consulting problem. The data, which becomes useable and reportable is analyzed, considered and adjusted, if necessary, and discussed relative to comparability. A diligent effort was made to acquire all pertinent data in respect to the items studied in this report. The subject property and market area were inspected on numerous occasions. All sales considered were inspected (exterior) and thoroughly analyzed. All conclusions are based upon my analysis of what might be expected in the subject property's competitive market. The appraiser's files are an integral part of this analysis, and are hereby incorporated by reference. The client, property owners, and other interested parties are quite familiar with the subject property's location, the surrounding neighborhood, market area, and other such general information. By definition, the purpose of this consulting report precludes use by members of the general public for purposes other than the purpose of this report. Therefore, this is a summary report in that information considered to be general in nature has been abbreviated in the interest of pertinence and clarity. The purpose of the consulting assignment was to consider if a change in use from a restaurant with a rooftop lounge to a six - story, 38 -room boutique hotel would cause any impact on the surrounding properties. The assignment will also consider if the six story building were to be built per the current specifications, would there be any impact to the properties that presently have a view of the Gulf of Mexico. Therefore, it was necessary to study condominiums within close proximity to restaurant buildings and pair the sales to condominiums that are not adjacent to or within close proximity to restaurant buildings. The sales considered for this section will be sales toward the southern end of Clearwater Beach in an area generally referred to as Clearwater Point, condominium 6 N.A. CI.AWZIO and ASSOCIATES, INC. sales in the northern section of Sand Key within close proximity to the Sheraton Sand Key and Marriott Hotels, and other sales in the general Clearwater Beach area. Also considered were additional sales from Clearwater Beach southerly to the Saint Petersburg Beach area of Pinellas County. The next analysis was to estimate if properties that had open views of the Gulf of Mexico (basically on the eastern side of Gulf Boulevard) appreciated at a rate similar to the competing projects after a high -rise building were built on the western side of Gulf Boulevard. The studied area for this section of the analysis was The Harbour Condominium project before and after the construction of the Ultimar project. The final section of this consulting report was to estimate if condominiums with views of the Gulf of Mexico sell higher than condominiums with different views and the impact on a condominiums due to the loss of such view. In this section of the analysis, the studied areas are units in the Harbour South condominium with Gulf of Mexico views paired to sales without such views; and condominiums in the Isle of Sand Key with Gulf of Mexico views versus units in Isle of Sand Key without Gulf of Mexico views. The data will be discussed is separate sections of this report. PROFESSIONAL ASSISTANCE Mr. Michael L. Sullivan SRA, State - Certified General Appraiser license number RZ820, assisted in the data collection and verification of the sales considered within this report. Mrs. Cyndi Tarapani vice president of Florida Design Consultants and Mr. Richard J. Heisenbottle president of R. J. Heisenbottle Architects provided substantial assistance in the size of the proposed building and the units that could possible be impacted by the development of the proposed six story boutique hotel. CLIENT The client is as follows: Mr. Thomas E. Reynolds, Esquire Randert, Steele, Bole and Reynolds 535 Central Avenue St. Petersburg, Florida 33701 INTENDED USERS This report is intended for the use of Mr. Reynolds and his representatives. The report is not intended for any other user. N.A. CI AWZIO and ASSOCIATES, INC. 1 1 1 1 1 1 r. A i Ut' C'-'L 3 ' 7CO3 Ll,,pl:tjUbi ;I:L LOCATION MAP 44UU;tt brew S c rwatcr Chestnut St ii r r 8 N.A. CLARIZIO and ASSOCIATES, INC. PART 11 - DESCRIPTION ANALYSIS AND CONCLUSIONS i i 9 ' ( N.A. CLAMZIO and ASSOCIATES, INC. 1 r EXPOSURE TIME The Dictionary of Real Estate Appraisal, Third Edition, defines "exposure time" as: 1. The time a property remains on the market. 2. The estimated length of time the property interest being appraised would have been offered on the market prior to the hypothetical consummation of a sale at market value on the effective date of the appraisal; a retrospective estimate based upon an analysis of past events assuming a competitive and open market. Exposure time is always presumed to occur prior to the effective date of the appraisal. The overall concept of reasonable exposure encompasses not only adequate, sufficient and reasonable time but also adequate, sufficient and reasonable effort. Exposure time is different for various types of real estate and value ranges and under various market conditions. Based on the foregoing, it is my opinion that a reasonable exposure time for the properties considered here within would be in the range of six to twelve months. 10 N.A. CLARIZIO and ASSOCIATES, INC. i i DESCRIPTION OF THE SITE (CABANA CLUB) Uplands 0.96 acres Preservation 0.42 acres Configuration Irregular Frontage Gulf Boulevard and the Gulf of Mexico Access Good Topography Basically Level Soil /Subsoil Appears adequate to support the site's Highest and Best Use . Ingress /Egress Average Utilities Water Public Sewer Public Electric Public Telephone Public Easements or Encroachments No adverse easements or encroachments noted ENVIRONMENTAL DISCLAIMER The value estimated is based on the assumption that the property is not negatively affected by the existence of hazardous substances or detrimental environmental conditions, unless otherwise stated in this report. The appraiser is not an expert in the identification of hazardous substances or detrimental environmental conditions. The appraiser's routine inspection of and inquiries about the subject property did not develop any information that indicated any apparent significant hazardous substances or detrimental environmental conditions, which would affect the property negatively unless otherwise stated in this report. It is possible that tests and inspections made by a qualified hazardous substance and environmental expert would reveal the existence of hazardous substances or detrimental environmental conditions on or around the property that would negatively affect its value. 11 N.A. CLAWZIO and ASSOCIATES, INC. i 1� �I ZONING The Cabana Club is zoned commercial by the City of Clearwater; the surrounding properties are zoned high density residential. 'j IMPROVEMENTS The Cabana Club improvements consist of a 13,534 square foot structure with 520 square foot carport and various open porches. The improvements are presently used as a restaurant with a rooftop lounge. The proposed improvements are a six-story hotel containing 38 rooms and an enclosed restaurant with a total height in the range of 84 feet to the peak of the roof. THE ANALYTICAL PROCESS This assignment is an appraisal consulting report. An appraisal consulting report is defined by the Dictionary of Real Estate Appraisal 4th Edition as, the act or process of developing an analysis, recommendation, or opinion to solve a problem, where an opinion of value is a component of the analysis leading to the assignment results. Approaches employed The technique considered in this report is a paired data analysis. A paired sales analysis is defined by the Dictionary of Real Estate Appraisal 4th Edition as a quantitative technique used to identify and measure adjustments to the sale prices or rents of comparable properties; to apply this technique, sales or rental data on nearly identical properties are analyzed to isolate a single characteristic's effect on value or rent. Approaches not considered applicable The Cost and Income Capitalization Approaches will not be employed. i 1' 12 ' N.A. CLARIZIO and ASSOCIATES, INC. ANALYSIS The purpose of the consulting assignment was to consider if a change in use from a restaurant with a rooftop lounge to a six -story boutique hotel would cause any impact on the surrounding properties. The assignment will also consider if the six story building were to be built per the current specifications, would there be any impact to the properties that presently have a view of the Gulf of Mexico. Therefore, it was necessary to study condominiums within close proximity to restaurant buildings and pair the sales to condominiums that are not adjacent to or within close proximity to restaurant buildings. The sales considered for this section will be sales toward the southern end of Clearwater Beach in an area generally referred to as Clearwater Point, sales of condominiums within close proximity to the Sheraton Sand Key Resort and Marriott Hotel on Sand Key, and other sales in the general Clearwater Beach area. Also considered were additional sales from Clearwater Beach southerly to the Saint Petersburg Beach area of Pinellas County. The sales in the Clearwater Point section of Clearwater Beach are as follows: Sales with water views within close proximity to the Shells Restaurant: Sale Date of Sale Sale Price Parcel Number $ /SF 1 05/07 $350,000 17- 29 -15- 16521- 000 -2070 $347.57 2 12/05 $470,000 17- 29 -15- 16521- 000 -2080 $466.73 3 07/07 $325,000 17- 29 -15- 16521- 000 -2100 $322.74 4 12/04 $230,300 17- 29 -15- 16521- 000 -3070 $228.70 Sales with water views: Sale Date of Sale Sale Price Parcel Number $ /SF A 09/06 $462,500 17- 29 -15- 16517- 000 -2010 $430.63 B 04/04 $320,000 17- 29 -15- 16517 - 000 -2040 $311.89 C 10/07 $330,000 17- 29 -15- 16517 - 000 -3010 $307.26 D 07/06 $525,000 17- 29 -15- 16520 - 000 -1090 $444.54 E 05/06 $530,000 17- 29 -15- 16520 - 000 -3100 $448.77 Pairings: Sale $ /SF Sale $ /SF 1 $347.57 C $307.26 2 $466.73 A $430.63 3 $466.73 D $444.54 4 $466.73 E $448.77 5 $322.74 C $307.26 6 $228.70 B $311.89 13 N.A. CIAWZIO and ASSOCIATES, INC. Based on the previous pairings the restaurant use does not appear to cause any measurable external obsolescence. To estimate if a hotel use compared to a restaurant use will have any negative impact on surrounding condominium uses numerous pairings were available. The control project was The Grande Condominium project on Sand Key, which is located next to the Sheraton Sand Key Resort and across the street from the Marriott Hotel and Columbia Restaurant. Sales in The Grande Condominium project were paired to condominium ' sales in the Meridian condominium project. The pairings are as follows: i Condo Project Unit Number Date of Sale Price /SF Grande on Sand Key 401 10/06 $595.00 Meridian on Sand Key 704 07/05 $603.41 Condo Project Unit Number Date of Sale Price /SF Grande on Sand Key 402 06/05 $672.35 Meridian on Sand Key 704 04/05 $603.41 Condo Project Unit Number Date of Sale Price /SF Grande on Sand Key 1002 04/06 $783.42 Meridian on Sand Key 1002 02/06 $740.74 Condo Project Unit Number Date of Sale Price /SF Grande on Sand Key 1102 05/05 $594.21 Meridian on Sand Key 902 03/05 $462.96 Condo Project Unit Number Date of Sale Price /SF Grande on Sand Key 1102 05/05 $594.21 Meridian on Sand Key 903 09/05 $651.79 14 N.A. CI AWZIO and ASSOCIATES, INC. 0 t The next analysis was to estimate if properties that had open views of the Gulf of Mexico, basically on the eastern side of Gulf Boulevard appreciated at a rate similar to the competing projects after a high -rise building was built on the western side of Gulf Boulevard. The studied area for this section of the analysis was the Harbour North Condominium before and after the construction of the Ultimar project. The Harbour project is located on the eastern side of Gulf Boulevard, whereas the Ultimar project is on the western side of Gulf Boulevard. Prior to the construction of the Ultimar project the Harbour North building had an unobstructed view of the Gulf of Mexico. The Ultimar project was built circa 1996. This section of the consulting report will consider sale - resale of units in the Harbour project prior to the Ultimar project to re -sale after the completion of the Ultimar project. The appreciation analysis will be compared to a project within close proximity to the Harbour project (Marina Del Rey) to measure if the development of the Ultimar project had any negative impact on the appreciation. MARINA DEL REY Parcel Number Sale Resale Monthly A reciation 19- 29 -15- 55303 - 000 -0050 11/96 07/05 1.39 19- 29 -15- 55303 - 000 -0120 08/96 06/03 1.43 19- 29 -15- 55303 - 000 -0280 11/92 10/00 0.64 19- 29 -15- 55303 - 000 -0310 12/94 03/04 1.10 19- 29 -15- 55303 - 000 -0580 06/92 09/00 0.91 19- 29 -15- 55303- 000 -0630 07/96 08/04 1.40 19- 29 -15- 55303- 000 -0660 03/88 12/04 1.01 19- 29 -15- 55303 - 000 -0700 04/93 05/06 1.40 19- 29 -15- 55303- 000 -0720 08/95 09/04 1.33 Average Monthly Appreciation 1.18 11 15 I N.A. CLAWZIO and ASSOCIATES, INC. 71 u 'f l HARBOUR NORTH BUILDING Parcel Number Sale Resale Monthly Appreciation 19- 29 -15- 36699 - 001 -1010 08/95 03/05 1.46 19- 29 -15- 36699 - 001 -1020 07/95 08/03 1.54 19- 29 -15- 36699 - 001 -1040 12/95 04/03 1.14 19- 29 -15- 36699 -001 -1050 06/92 04/99 0.48 19- 29 -15- 36699 -001 -2030 06/92 05/97 0.30 19- 29 -15- 36699 -001 -4010 04/87 02/04 0.99 19- 29 -15- 36699 -001 -4030 07/91 07/97 0.73 19- 29 -15- 36699 - 001 -5050 06/91 07/02 1.20 19- 29 -15- 36699 - 001 -7020 03/84 04/98 0.36 Average Monthly Appreciation 0.91 Comparing the appreciation in the Harbour North building before and after the construction of the Ultimar building to the Marina Del Ray project indicated that the development of the Ultimar building had a slight negative impact on the monthly appreciation. The final section of this consulting report was to estimate if condominiums with views of the Gulf of Mexico sell higher than condominiums with different views and the impact on a condominium due to the loss of such view. In this section of the analysis the studied areas are units in the Harbour South condominium with Gulf of Mexico views paired to sales without such views and condominiums in the Isle of Sand Key with Gulf of Mexico views versus the units in Isle of Sand Key without Gulf of Mexico views. In the Harbour South building the southern most units would be units numbered 05, consequently the northern most units would be 01 numbered units. The southern most units have the most Gulf of Mexico views. Unit Number Date of Sale Sale Price $ /SF 405 01/04 $329,000 $243.88 403 11/02 $309,000 $226.71 405 01/04 $329,000 $243.88 401 06/04 $344,000 $255.00 The first pairing, units 405 to 403 indicated a negative impact of 7.57 %, whereas the second pairing units 405 to 401 did not indicate a view impact. The next studied project is the Isle of Sand Key Project. In this project the views are as follows: 16 N.A. CLARIZIO and ASSOCIATES, INC. Unit View 01 Gulf of Mexico 02 Gulf of Mexico 03 Canal 04 Bay/Parking 05 Canal 06 Parkin 07 Intracoastal Waterway 08 Bay Isle of Sand Key Unit Number Sale Date $ /SF % of Change 202 04/05 $268.67 N/A 204 02/04 $245.38 9.49% Isle of Sand Key Unit Number Sale Date $ /SF % of Change 401 07/04 $245.33 N/A 204 02/04 245.38 N/A Isle of Sand Key Unit Number Sale Date $ /SF % of Change 802 01/04 $273.33 N/A 906 05/04 $265.38 3.00% Isle of Sand Key Unit Number Sale Date $ /SF % of Change 1002 03/04 $242.00 9.66% 906 05/04 $265.38 N/A The first pairing indicated a positive view amenity of 9.49 %; the second pairing did not indicate any adjustment. The third pairing indicated a view amenity adjustment of 3 %. The last pairing did not indicate a positive view amenity. CONCLUSIONS The units that could be impacted by the development of the six -story hotel are the southern most two units in the Harbour South building and the northwest units in the Isle of Sand Key building. Ms. Tarapani has indicated that the first and second floors of the Harbour South building are impacted by the existing building and the units on floors three thru seven could be affected by the development of the proposed hotel. Mrs. Tarapani also indicated that there is no parking under the Isle of Sand Key building and N.A. CLARIZIO and ASSOCIATES, INC. D 0 I that the first three floors of the Isle of Sand Key building are impacted by the existing restaurant building and floors four thru nine will be affected by the proposed building. Based on the analysis within this report, it is my opinion that the impact to the fifteen affected units due to the proposed hotel and the subsequent loss of the view amenity of the Gulf of Mexico would be in the range of 5% to 10 %. The impacted units would be the southern two most units in the Harbour South building on floors three thru six, southern most unit on floor seven, and the units in the northwest corner of Isle of Sand Key on floors four thru nine. COST APPROACH The Cost Approach is an appraisal technique in which the indicated value of a property is derived by estimating the replacement of reproduction cost new of the improvements, deducting the estimated depreciation from all causes, and then adding the market value of the land. The theoretical basis for the Cost Approach is reproduction cost. The Cost Approach is based on the premise that the value of a property can be indicated by the current reproduction or replacement cost, less the amount of depreciation evident from all causes, plus the value of the site or land and entrepreneurial profit. The Cost Approach will not be employed. INCOME CAPITALIZATION APPROACH The Income Capitalization Approach is that method or procedure in appraisal analysis, which converts anticipated benefits (dollar income or amenities) to be derived from the ownership of the property into a value estimate. In this approach, anticipated future income and /or reversions are discounted to a present worth figure through the capitalization process. Capitalization is the procedure of expressing such anticipated future benefits of ownership in dollars and processing them into a present worth at a rate which is attracting purchase capital to similar investments. As employed in the Income Approach, this procedure uses a projection of periodic net income as the numerator with a capitalization rate as the denominator in an equation for value. This process is most directly applicable to the appraisal of the value of an income - producing property because a primary benefit of such ownership is in the form of net rent, and the expectation of this income is a primary motivation for the purchase of income real estate. The Income Capitalization Approach will be omitted. 18 N.A. CLARIZIO and ASSOCIATES, RVC. i RECONCILIATION AND FINAL CONCLUSION Based on the analysis within this report, it is my opinion that the partial diminution in value to the fifteen affected units due to the proposed hotel and the subsequent loss of the view amenity of the Gulf of Mexico would be in the range of 5% to 10 %. The impacted units would be the two southern most units in the Harbour South building on floors three thru six, the southern most unit on floor seven, and the units in the northwest corner of Isle of Sand Key on floors four thru nine. The impacted units in Harbour South Condominium are units 304, 305, 404, 405, 504, 505, 604, 605, and 702. The impacted units in Isle of Sand Key are units 402, 502, 602, 702, 802, and 902. It is my opinion that the change in use from a restaurant with a rooftop lounge to a six - story boutique hotel will not have an unfavorable effect on the market area. I N.A. CIAWZIO and ASSOCIATES, INC. n 1 ASSUMPTIONS AND LIMITING CONDITIONS This appraisal consulting report has been made with the following assumptions and limiting conditions. ♦ No responsibility is assumed for the legal description, or legal matters, and title to the property is assumed to be good and marketable unless otherwise stated. The legal description used in this report is assumed to be correct. ♦ Both legal description and dimensions are taken from sources thought to be authoritative, however, no responsibility is assumed for either unless a survey by a competent engineer is furnished. Sketches in the report are visual aids only and not to scale. They are included to assist the reader in visualizing the property. ♦ The property is analyzed free and clear of any or all liens or encumbrances unless otherwise stated. ♦ Responsible ownership and competent property management are assumed. The information furnished by others is believed to be reliable; however, no warranty is given for its accuracy. ♦ All engineering is assumed to be correct. The plot plans and exhibits included in this report are included only to assist the reader in visualizing the property. ♦ Possession of this report, or copy thereof, does not carry with it the right of publication or reproduction, nor may it be used by any but the applicant without prior written consent of the applicant and the appraiser, and in any event, only in its entirety. ♦ The appraiser herein by reason of this appraisal consulting assignment is not required to give further consultation, testimony, or be in attendance in court with reference to the property in question unless arrangements have previously been made thereof. ♦ The distribution, if any, of the total valuation of this report applies only under the stated program of utilization. The separate valuations for land and buildings, if any, must not be used in conjunction with any other appraisal and are invalid if so used. ♦ Disclosure of the contents of this report is governed by the By -Laws and Regulations of the Appraisal Institute. Neither all nor any part of the contents of this report (especially any conclusions as to value, the identity of the appraiser or the firm with which he or she is connected) shall be disseminated to the public through advertising, public relations, news, sales or other media without the prior written consent and approval of the appraisers. Further, the appraiser or firm assumes no obligation, liability, or accountability to any third -party. 20 N.A. CLAMZIO and ASSOCIATES, INC. F ♦ If this report is placed in the hands of anyone but the client, client shall make such party aware of all the assumptions and limiting conditions of the assignment. ♦ This report has been made in accordance with the rules of professional ethics of the Appraisal Institute. ♦ No environmental impact studies were either requested or made in conjunction with this consulting report, and the appraiser hereby reserves the right to alter, amend, revise, or rescind any of the value opinions based upon any subsequent environmental impact studies, research or investigation. ♦ It is assumed that the soil is suitable for well and septic tank use, if applicable, and there is no hidden or unapparent conditions of the property, subsoil (including minerals), or structures which would render it more or less valuable. No responsibility is assumed for such conditions or for engineering, which may be required to discover them. ♦ It is assumed that there is full compliance with all applicable federal, state, and local environmental regulations and laws unless non - compliance is stated, defined, and considered in this consulting report. ♦ It is assumed that all required licenses, consents, or other legislative or administrative authority from all local, state, or national governments or private entities or organizations have been or can be obtained or renewed for any use on which the value estimates contained in this report are based. It is assumed that the utilization of the land and improvements is within the boundaries or property lines of the property described and that there is no encroachment or trespass unless noted within this report. ♦ Information furnished by others is assumed to be true, correct, and reliable. A reasonable effort has been made to verify such information; however, no responsibility for its accuracy is assumed by the appraiser. ♦ Acceptance of and /or use of this appraisal consulting report constitutes acceptance of the foregoing general assumptions and general limiting conditions. ♦ Liability for this appraisal consulting assignment is limited only to the extent of the fee collected. ♦ The conclusions as to market value contained herein represent the opinion of the undersigned and are not to be construed in any way as a guarantee or warranty; either expressed or implied that the property described herein will actually sell for the market value contained in this opinion. Subsurface rights (minerals, oil, or water) were not considered in this report. 21 N.A. CLARIZIO and ASSOCIATES, INC. 7 C' u ♦ All value estimates have been made contingent on zoning regulations and land use plans in effect as of the date of the report, and based on information provided by governmental authorities and employees. ♦ Certain data used in compiling this report was furnished by the client, his counsel, employees, and /or agent, or from other sources believed reliable. However, no liability or responsibility may be assumed for complete accuracy. ♦ An effort was made to verify each comparable sale noted in the report. There are times when it is impossible to confirm a sale with the parties involved in the transaction; all sales are confirmed through public records or closing attorney. ♦ No furniture, furnishings, or equipment, unless specifically indicated herein has been included in my value conclusions. Only the real estate has been considered. ♦ No survey of the property was made or caused to be made by the appraiser. It is assumed the legal description closely delineates the property. It was checked with public records for accuracy. Drawings in this report are to assist the reader in visualizing the property and are only an approximation of grounds or building plan. ♦ Description and condition of physical improvements, if any described herein, are based on visual observation. As no engineering tests were conducted, no liability can be assumed for soundness of structural members. ♦ The appraiser has inspected improvements. Unless otherwise noted, subject improvements are assumed to be free of termites, dry rot, wet rot, or other infestation. Inspection by a reputable pest control company is recommended for any existing improvement. ♦ No responsibility is assumed by the appraiser for applicability of "concurrency laws" referring to the 1985 amendments to Chapter 163, Florida Statutes. At this time it is unclear what effect, if any, these laws might have on any property in a given county. The reader is cautioned, therefore, to fully investigate the likelihood of development moratoriums or other governmental actions with appropriate municipal, county, or state officials. ♦ Appraisal consult does not constitute an inspection for compliance with local building, fire, or zoning codes. Reader is advised to contact local government offices to ensure compliance with applicable ordinances. ♦ This appraisal consulting report covers only the premises herein; and no figures provided, analysis thereof, or any unit values derived there from are to be construed as applicable to any other property, however similar they may be. 22 N.A. CLAMZIO and ASSOCIATES, INC. '' ♦ This report has been prepared solely for the private use of the client who is listed p p p Y p above as the addressee. No other party is entitled to rely on the information, i conclusions, or opinions contained herein. ♦ Neither all nor any portion of the contents of this report shall be conveyed to the ' public through advertising, public relations, news, sales, or other media without the written consent and approval of the appraiser, particularly as to valuation conclusions, identity of the appraiser or firm with which he is connected, or any ' reference to the Appraisal Institute or to the MAI or SRA designations. Furthermore, neither all nor any portion of the contents of this report shall be used in connection with any offer, sale, or purchase of a security (as that term is defined in Section 2(1) of the Securities Act of 1933) without the prior express written consent of the appraiser. ' ♦ Estimates of expenses, particularly as to assessment by the County Property Appraiser and subsequent taxes, are based on historical or typical data. Such estimates are based on assumptions and projections which, as with any ' predication, are affected by external forces, many unforeseeable. While all estimates are based on my best knowledge and belief, no responsibility can be assumed that such projections will come true. ♦ Unless otherwise stated in this report, the existence of radon gas, a naturally occurring element, or hazardous materials, which may or may not be present on ' the property, was not observed by the appraiser. The appraiser has no -a knowledge of the existence of such materials on or in the property. The appraiser, however, is not qualified to detect such substances. The presence of substances such as asbestos, urea - formaldehyde foam insulation or other potentially hazardous materials may affect the value of the property. The value ' estimate is predicated on the assumption that there is no such material on or in the property that would cause a loss in value. No responsibility is assumed for any such conditions, or for any expertise or engineering knowledge required to discover them. The client is urged to retain an expert in this field, if desired. ♦ Only the real estate has been considered. I 23 N.A. CLARIZIO and ASSOCIATES, INC. I I ADDENDA N.A. OI CLARIZIO and ASSOCIATES, EVC. 111 ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS �� N.A. CLARIZIO and ASSOCIATES, INC. HEISENBOTTLE :i °9 FCVCE D_ -EON BL4]., SUITE 400 'OR-L 7`BLES, FL 33134 YELCF -10I -: X5/446- -799 FA -: 375'5 -5 -' 23 FLORIDA , EGISTRAI -DN NWEEF- AR 001065 EAST ELEW TION REN = =14r4C BELLE`lIEW BILTMO -RE CAB A M CLUB 159A Gul Sou �var3 Clearwater Ribiwa ;CF- EMATC DESIG-i FEBFcJAPY 1, 2008 FRO'r +SED EACH FRCNT -IOTEL FEND -IN3 W. 91 r = = = = m = m = I= = i = m = m RI HEISENBOTTLE 2199 PONCE OE LEI?J BLVD., SUITE 400 :ORAL GABLES, FL 33134 TELEFF/ONE; 305%446 -7799 FAX: 305/446 -9275 F,.ORIDA REGISTRATION NUMBER: AR 0010865 — 0— as.. --uw —u VEST 1EVr.TION RENIX-JANG BEL_EVIEN BILTM*DRE CAB. -\NA CLUB 159C Cilf Eoulrvard Clearwater, lnib SCHLM-NTIC DESIGN4 FIBRL ARY 29, 2008 PROPOSE BEAiy'HF� p- RON HaTEL E A -6.Q m = = == m= ■r m= m m= r m w ( r N BELLEVIEW BILTMORE HOTEL & RESORT 25 Bellevim Boulevard Clearwater, Florida i SCHEMATIC DESIGN February 1, 2008 I, R1 HEISENBOTTLE s c n i r i c r e 340 MMRCA AVE, WVE 10 CORAL GA&ES. FL 33134 TELEKOC' 305/446 -7799 FAY: 305/446 -9275 FIOR@A REGEMDIR HUMBER AR 0010665 PROPOSED BEACH FRONT HOTEL i i i i i C9 IZ • Wallace Roberts & Todd, LLC wwcw..n .nw 1 QUALIFICATIONS << N.A. CLARIZIO and ASSOCIATES, INC. 1 1 Il QUALIFICATIONS OF NICHOLAS A. CLARIZIO, MAI, SRA INTRODUCTION Nicholas Clarizio has over 20 years of real estate appraisal experience. Since 1985 Nicholas Clarizio has specialized in the appraisal of properties in eminent domain or litigation matters. PROFESSIONAL DESIGNATIONS Member of the Appraisal Institute - MAI, #9302 - March 1992 Senior Residential Appraiser - SRA - November 1984 State Certified General Appraiser - License #RZ202 APPRAISAL COURSES SUCCESSFULLY COMPLETED Society of Real Estate Appraisers - Course 101 American Institute of Real Estate Appraisers: - May 1981 Capitalization Theory and Techniques, Part A - June 1986 Capitalization Theory and Techniques, Part B - September 1986 Case Studies in Real Estate Valuation - May 1987 Standards of Professional Practice - September 1988 Appraisal Institute Standards of Professional Practice Course 430 - June 1999 APPRAISAL COURSES SUCCESSFULLY CHALLENGED Society of Real Estate Appraisers - Course 102 SEMINARS Society of Real Estate Appraisers Narrative Report Writing The Appraiser as Expert Witness Condemnation Seminar Professional Practice Comprehensive Workshop Real Estate Education Specialists Modern Appraisal Techniques USPAP Law Update Appraisal Methods and Applications - April 1983 - January 1989 - April 1989 - July 1990 - January 1991 N.A. CLARIZIO and ASSOCIATES, INC. - July 1994 - July 1996 - July 1996 r SEMINARS CONTINUED Appraisal Institute Standards of Professional Practice Course 410 Advanced Income Capitalization Course 510 Attacking & Defending an Appraisal in Litigation Valuation 2000 Valuation of Inland Angling Rights Two Sides of the Story-The Valuation of Citrus Business Enterprise Value Plantings in Changing Markets Appraisal Institute Assessment Appeals in Florida Computer Concepts and Effective E -Mail Florida State Law for Real Estate Appraisers USPAP Update ONLINE COURSES Real Estate, Mortgages, and the Law Appraisal Principles Florida Real Estate Appraisal License Law Communicating the Appraisal Neighborhood Analysis Sales Comparison Approach COMPREHENSIVE EXAM Appraisal Institute - February 1991 - Successfully Completed EXPERT TESTIMONY Federal Bankruptcy Court (Hillsborough County) Circuit Court (Pasco County) Circuit Court (Pinellas County) Circuit Court (Hillsborough County) Circuit Court (Lake County) Circuit Court (Hernando County) - May 1999 - December 1999 - June 2000 -July 2000 -July 2000 -July 2000 -July 2000 October 2004 October 2004 October 2004 October 2004 September 2006 September 2006 September 2006 September 2006 September 2006 September 2006 Special Master for Pinellas County Property Appraisal Adjustment Board -1985 N.A. CIARIZIO and ASSOCIATES, INC. PROFESSIONAL MEMBERSHIPS Appraisal Institute, MAl and SRA Designations EXPERIENCE Nicholas Clarizio has personally appraised numerous property types including the following: 9 Vacant Land Single Family Dwellings Two -Four Unit Dwellings Apartments Condominiums Residential Subdivisions Adult Care Facilities Day Care Centers Mobile Home Parks Vacant Commercial Vacant Industrial Parks ' Environmentally Sensitive Land Proposed Commercial Centers Retail Buildings Banks Shopping Centers (Non Anchored) Anchored Shopping Centers Office Buildings Restaurants Motels Hotels Mini Warehouses ' Warehouses Industrial Properties Easements Manufacturing Auto Service Centers Marinas Service Stations ' Convenience Stores Agricultural Lands Nurseries Churches Mining Properties ' Golf Courses N.A. CI.ARIZIO and ASSOCIATES, INC. t EMINENT DOMAIN PROJECTS Nicholas Clarizio has appraised one or more parcels in the following projects. State Road 44 (Citrus) State Road 35 (Charlotte) State Road 35 (Desoto) Suncoast Parkway (Hernando) State Road 50 (Hernando) Cortez Road (Hernando) Bloomingdale Avenue (Hillsborough) Upper Tampa Bay Trail (Hillsborough) State Road 200 (Marion) State Road 35 (Marion) State Road 54 (Pasco) State Road 52 (Pasco) Little Road (Pasco) Decubellis Road (Pasco) Ridge Road (Pasco) Massachusetts Avenue (Pasco) Rowan Road (Pasco) Suncoast Parkway (Pasco) U. S. 41 (Pasco) Bayside Bridge (Pinellas) East Bay Drive (Pinellas) Live Oak Extension (Pinellas) McMullen Booth Road (Pinellas) State Road 580 (Pinellas) Bear Creek (Pinellas) Old Pasco Road (Pasco) 17th Street (Manatee) Levis Avenue (Pinellas) U. S. Highway 19 (Pinellas) Keystone Road (Pinellas) Oil Well Road (Collier) Bryan Dairy Road (Pinellas) Drew Street (Pinellas) Belcher Extension (Pinellas) Curlew Road (Pinellas) Gulf Boulevard (Pinellas) 49th Street (Pinellas) 40th Street (Hillsborough) Sunset Point Road (Pinellas) 66th Street (Pinellas) Blind Pass Road (Pinellas) Interstate 4 (Polk) Catfish Creek (Polk) State Road 39 (Hillsborough) US 441 (Orange) Griffin Road (Polk) US 301 (Pasco) State Road 100 (Flagler) Otis Allen Road (Pasco) Zephyrhills Bypass (Pasco) Interstate 4 (Hillsborough) Interstate 4 (Orange) Orange Blossom Trail (Orange) 22 "d Street (Hillsborough) Dodecanese Road (Pinellas) East Colonia (Sarasota) Park/Starkey Road (Pinellas) Sunshine Grove Road (Hernando) Keystone Road (Pinellas) Moon Lake Road (Pasco) Ulmerton Road (Pinellas) Rock Springs Road (Orange) I� N.A. CLARIZIO and ASSOCIATES, INC. PARTIAL LIST OF APPRAISAL CLIENTS All Florida Financial Amsouth Bank Amp, Inc. Amresco Bay Area Investment Brian A. Bolves, Esquire Stephen Booth, Esquire Mark P. Buell, Esquire Gerald Buhr, Esquire Paul Cavonis, Esquire Carlisle Motors Marcus Castillo, Esquire Cenlar FSB Centerpointe Realty Citifed Chemical Mortgage City of Clearwater City of New Port Richey City of Port Richey Harry Cline, Esquire Columbia HCA David M. Corry, Esquire Bruce Crawford, Esquire Crown Bank Harvey V. Delzer, Esquire Diocese of St. Petersburg, Mary Lynne Duet, Esquire Jack Eckerd Estate Gerald Figurski, Esquire Brain Forbes, Esquire First American Title First Bank of Oak Park First Florida Bank First N. H. Bank (Catholic Church) Florida Gas Transmission Company Florida Department of Transportation Florida Power Corp. Ford Motor Credit Michael Gaines, Esquire Amy J. Galloway, Esquire Michael Gaines, Esquire Gulf Coast Jewish Community Care Lee Haas, Esquire Joseph M. Hanratty, Esquire Bruce Harlan, Esquire J. Ben Harrill, Esquire Michael Hastings, Esquire James A. Helinger, Jr., Esquire Hillsborough County Holiday Inn Scott Johnson, Esquire Jon C. Kieffer, Esquire Suzanne LaBerge, Esquire Life Savings Michael MacKenzie, Esquire Emil Marquardt, Esquire Daniel Martin, Esquire Robert McDermott, Esquire William T. McCaig, Esquire Donald O. McFarland, Esquire D. Guy McMullen Properties Mobil Oil Corp. Raandi L. Morales, Esquire NCNB Mark Ossian, Esquire William McCaig, Esquire Orion Bank H. Rex Owen, Esquire John Pecarek, Esquire Judge Charles W. Phillips Pinellas County Quality Boats Daniel Rock, Esquire Red Ribbon Homestead Resolution Trust Corp. Jawdet I. Rubaii, Esquire Michael Sierra, Esquire David Smitherman, Esquire Storz Opthalmics Suburban Propane Tampa Bay Water Taylor Woodrow Judge Vilanti Fred J. Wilder, Esquire West Coast Regional Water Supply Authority Word of Life Youth and Family Alternatives Tyrone Zdracko, Esquire N.A. CLARMIO and ASSOCIATES, INC. C y Y H CITY OF CLEARWATER Beach Area Traffic Study Prepared for City of Clearwater Planning Department Clearwater, FL DKS Associates 12000 North Dale Mabry Highway, Suite 112 Tampa, FL 33618 CITY OF CLEARWATER Beach Area Traffic Study Prepared for City of Clearwater Public Works Administration Clearwater, FL DKS Associates 12000 North Dale Mabry Highway, Suite 112 Tampa, FL 33618 Jerry T. Wentzel, P.E. Florida Registration # 30802 February, 2008 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction 1 Study Area 1 Future Development Estimates 3 Trip Generation Estimates 6 Trip Distribution /Area of Influence 9 Background Traffic 12 Level of Service Evaluations 13 Mitigation Requirements 16 Summary 22 Appendices 23 List of Figures 1: Beach Study Area 2 2: Study Area Roadway System _4 3: Net New AM Build Out Volumes 10 4: Net New PM Build Out Volumes 11 5: Existing AM Volumes 14 6: Existing PM Volumes 15 7: Fort Harrison Mitigation Concept 20 8: Fort Harrison Mitigation Concept (Four Lane Alternative) 21 List of Tables 1: Summary of Approved Development Projects 5 2: Summary of Redevelopment Potential (A 210 Rooms /Acre Maximum Density) 6 3: Summary of Net New Trips (Approved Development) 7 4: Summary of Net New Potential Redevelopment Trips ((a) 210 Rooms /Acre Maximum Density) 7 5: Summary of Net New Potential Redevelopment Trips by Density Alternative 8 6: Summary of Intersection Level of Service Analyses 17 7: Summary of Arterial Level of Service Analyses 18 8: Summary of Intersection Level of Service with Mitigation 19 9: Summary of Arterial Level of Service with Mitigation 22 iii C 1 Beach Area Traffic Study Introduction The vitality of Clearwater Beach is an ongoing concern of the City of Clearwater. Since 2001 when the Beach by Design guidelines were adopted, significant redevelopment has begun to occur including major high rise condominium and resort hotel projects. Major changes to the roadway and parking systems are ongoing with the reconstruction of Coronado Drive, the curvilinear realignment of Gulfview Boulevard, redesign of the Pier 60 parking lot and relocation of public parking lots west of Gulfview Boulevard to garage facilities east of Gulfview Boulevard. During this period the City of Clearwater has approved a significant number of redevelopment plans for Clearwater Beach properties involving the conversion of older small scale hotels to condominiums. These have been especially prevalent in the Old Florida, Beach Walk, Small Hotel and the South Beach/Clearwater Pass Districts where 489 hotel rooms are currently proposed for conversion to residential units. Many of these plans however have been stalled by the current nationwide downturn in the housing industry. While economic conditions will continue to have a major role in development trends, the current land use density restrictions placed on the Clearwater Beach area are also thought to unduly favor residential uses over hotel uses. Therefore, to encourage a balance of economically vital uses in the area, the City of Clearwater is considering increasing the allowable density for hotel uses. Recognizing that such changes can have a significant impact on the transportation system, the City has commissioned this study to evaluate the adequacy of the roadway system to accommodate a significant increase in hotel rooms within the Clearwater Beach area. The purpose of this study is to provide estimates of the potential for hotel anchored redevelopment based upon current land -use and zoning patterns and to evaluate the adequacy of the roadway system to accommodate the increased traffic associated with this redevelopment. Study Area The proposed study area is bounded by the Clearwater City Limits on the south, Somerset Street on the north, the Gulf of Mexico on the west and Clearwater Bay on the east. Figure 1 shows the study area. The study area has been divided into the following nine districts, eight of which are from the Beach by Design study: 1 1 ' ❖ ❖ Old Florida Beachwalk ❖ Destination Resort ❖ Small Hotel ' ❖ Marina Residential ❖ South Beach/Clearwater Pass ❖ Retail and Restaurant ❖ Sand. Key ❖ Pier 60 For the purposes of data compilation, Sand Key was added as a ninth district. Figure 2 identifies 1 the major components of the roadway system serving the study area. i Future Development Estimates Estimates of the potential for hotel redevelopment in the study area have been prepared by examining existing land -use and zoning patterns, future land use designations as well as recently completed and/or recently approved projects. The detailed land use information that was ' compiled for this evaluation is contained in the Appendix to this report. Key factors that were considered in determining the potential for hotel redevelopment included the amount and location of vacant land, current residential densities, the potential for consolidating parcels and compatibility with the Beach by Design planning and design guidelines within the applicable districts. Properties which have been recently redeveloped or are under construction or have an approved site plan were not considered as having redevelopment potential. 0 The study area contains approximately 445 acres of land (excluding transportation/utilities, ' coastal and/or submerged lands). Of this total amount there are approximately 162 acres of recreational/open space and institutional uses. The remainder of this area includes 178 acres of ' residential uses and 58 acres of hotel uses, 28 acres of commercial uses, 14 acres under construction and 5 vacant acres. Currently, there are approximately 30 acres of land which have ' already been approved for redevelopment, including the Marquesas, Entrada, Aqualea, Adams Mark and Kiran Grande projects. These recent development approvals have resulted in a net ' increase of 237 hotel rooms and 887 residential dwelling units in the study area. When completed, these approved projects will include 1023 hotel rooms and 932 residential dwelling ' units. Approximately 786 existing hotel rooms and 45 existing residential units will be lost in the redevelopment process. An increase 16.7 acres of residential uses will result along with a loss of one acre of hotel uses. Table 1 summarizes the net increases in hotel and residential development associated with the approved projects, by district. 3 1 1 t Table 1 Cnmmnry of Annrnverl Dt- vAnnment Prniertc District Net New Hotel Units (Rooms) Net New Residential Units (DUs) Commercial (ks fl Old Florida -68 90 0 Destination Resort 0 0 0 Retail/Restaurant 0 0 0 Marina 0 2 0 Pier 60 0 0 0 Beach Walk 473 250 0 Small Hotel -59 119 0 South Beach/Clearwater Pass -109 426 0 Sand Key 0 0 0 Total 237 887 0.0 The maximum potential for additional hotel development was determined by examining the existing and approved land use patterns by planning district. Using this data, approximately 33 acres of additional property in the study area was identified as having a reasonable potential for redevelopment under a higher maximum density for hotel use. This includes 14.8 acres in the Sand Key District. Assuming a maximum density of 210 rooms /acre for hotel redevelopment on Clearwater Beach and a maximum density of 125 rooms /acre for hotel redevelopment on Sand Key, (except for the Cabana Club @ 60 units per acre), the identified properties have the potential for a total of 5,601 hotel rooms.. These properties currently include 1,407 existing hotel rooms (610 on Sand Key) and four existing residential dwelling units. Redevelopment of all these parcels to the maximum densities would result in a net increase of 4,194 hotel rooms and a loss of four residential dwelling units. An additional 7.57 acres of land (with 150 existing residential dwelling units) was identified as having a potential for residential redevelopment at a maximum density of 30 dwelling units /acre. The resulting 227 residential dwelling units on these properties would yield a net increase of 77 residential units. In summary, a maximum potential net increase of 4,194 hotel rooms and 73 residential dwelling units in the study area has been identified under the maximum allowable density assumptions. This maximum development potential is equivalent to achieving an average density of approximately 127 rooms /acre for all hotel properties and 27 dwelling units /acre for all E residential properties. Additionally the potential for a minor net increase in retail space of ' 30,000 sf has been identified. Table 2 summarizes this estimated maximum redevelopment potential by District. These maximum potential development levels represent the net increase over existing plus approved development in the district. A detailed summary of the assumptions used to determine the maximum development potential in each district is included in the Appendix. ' Table 2 Summary of Redevelopment Potential ((a, 210 Rooms /Acre Maximum Density) t District Net New Hotel (Rooms) Net New Residential DUs Commercial (ks fl Old Florida 210 38 0 Destination Resort 741 0 0 Retail/Restaurant 0 0 5.0 Marina 484 16 10.0 Pier 60 210 0 0 Beach Walk 428 0 0 Small Hotel 479 19 0 South Beach/Clearwater Pass 470 0 15.0 Sand Key ( @125 rooms /acre) 1,172 0 0 Total 4,194. 73 30.0 ' Trip Generation Estimates Estimates of the Daily, AM peak hour and PM peak hour trips generated by the approved iprojects and potential new development have been made using trip generation rates compiled by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (7"' Edition). For the purpose of estimating hotel based ' trips, the ITE Land Use Category 330, Resort Hotel, was used. This category was selected because of the overall resort/recreational characteristics of the districts in which many of the trips iwill be captured on. site or by immediately surrounding businesses and recreational facilities. Tables 3 and 4 summarize the estimated net new trips by district for the approved development ' and the potential redevelopment sites at maximum land use densities. The detailed calculation of trips for each of the land uses within the districts is provided in the Appendix. Cal 1 Table 3 Summary of Net New Trins (Annroved DevelonmenA District Daily AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Old Florida 121 30 29 Destination Resort 0 0 0 Retail/Restaurant 0 0 0 Marina 12 2 3 Pier 60 0 0 0 Beach Walk 4,406 274 330 Small Hotel 723 58 67 South Beach/Clearwater Pass 1,083 106 116 Sand Key 0 0 0 Total 6,345 470 545 ' Table 4 Summary of Net New Potential Redevelonment Trins ((a. 210 Rooms /Acre Maximum Densitv) 1 District Daily AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Old Florida 1,644 90 103 Destination Resort 5,076 267 383 Retail/Restaurant 426 11 5 Marina 4,290 209 282 Pier 60 1,439 81 92 Beach Walk 2,932 149 247 Small Hotel 2,998 162 213 South Beach/Clearwater Pass 4,094 202 260 Sand Key 8,028 418 642 Total 30,927 1,589 2,227 It is clear that trips from the above maximum redevelopment potential, when added to the approved development trips, would overburden the existing transportation infrastructure for the study area. In order to evaluate the "redevelopment" capacity of the existing transportation system, the traffic demands from alternative redevelopment densities, varying from 70 rooms /acre (33% of 210 maximum) to 120 rooms /acre (57% of 210 maximum), have been estimated. The density assumptions used in the scenarios are not intended to be a recommended maximum allowable density or a specific development level for a given district or given site. The purpose ' is to use the density assumptions to identify general redevelopment levels (i.e. aggregate number 7 of hotel rooms) which, under the current transportation concurrency regulations, would trigger the need for improvements to the roadway system. The aggregate number of hotel rooms has an equivalent average density value which can be derived from the total acres of hotel uses in the study area. The net new hotel rooms and residential dwelling units associated with each alternative development density level were estimated by multiplying the acreage of potential redevelopment parcels within each district by the alternative density. The hotel redevelopment density for Sand Key was fixed at 100 rooms /acre for all scenarios (80% of maximum) with an additional 50 rooms allotted to the Cabana Club. Residential redevelopment was fixed at 30 dwelling units /acre for each scenario and 30.0 ksf of retail was included with each scenario. For the purposes of this analysis "Build Out" is assumed to occur at the density of 120 hotel rooms /acre for potential hotel redevelopment parcels the Clearwater Beach districts. This "Build Out" scenario represents a net increase in the study area of 2,210 hotel rooms and 73 residential dwelling units and 30,000 sf of new commercial space over the already approved development projects. The 2,210 net new hotel rooms is equivalent to an average density of 90.4 rooms /acre for all hotel parcels in the study area. The trips associated with varying density assumptions have been estimated using the previously described trip rate data. Table 5 provides a summary of the Daily, AM peak hour and PM peak hour trips for the study area for the alternative land use density assumptions. Table 5 Summary of Net New Potential Rerlevelnnment Trim by Density Alternative Hotel Density (Rooms /Acre) Total Study Area Redevelopment Net New Hotel Rooms (Includes 825 rooms Sand Key Daily Trips AM Peak Hour Trips PM Peak Hour Trips 120 (Build Out) 2,210 17,335 895 1,150 110 2,029 16,117 833 1,064 i00 1,847 14,849 768 978 90 1,664 13,595 705 895 80 1,483 12,356 625 818 70 1,333 11,329 567 758 I These trips when added to the approved development trips represent the net new traffic demands associated with each redevelopment scenario in the study area. Trip Distribution /Area of Influence The expected distribution of these new trips over the roadway system was determined using travel patterns as forecasted by the Tampa Bay Regional Transportation Planning Model. These ' directional distributions as generated by the model are provided in the Appendix. Separate assignments have been used for the trips generated within each of the districts. The distribution percentages derived from the model are documented in the intersection traffic volumes 1 projections provided in the Appendix. Figures 3 and 4 summarize the projected net new AM and PM peak hour volumes generated by the redevelopment of the study area under the "Build Out" scenario. The volumes shown include approved development traffic. Detailed assignments of the redevelopment traffic to the key intersection movements are provided in the Appendix. As indicated by the traffic assignments, the most significant impacts of new development traffic are anticipated at the Roundabout and on the Memorial Bridge. Approximately 70 percent of the traffic generated by new development is expected to pass through the Roundabout. Approximately 65 percent of the new development traffic will use the Memorial Causeway Bridge for access to the mainland. Given this distribution pattern, the following key intersections were selected for detailed Level of Service analyses: ❖ Court @ Fort Harrison ❖ Chestnut @ Fort Harrison ❖ Clearwater Beach Roundabout ❖ Mandalay @ Baymont ❖ Gulf @ Gulfview ❖ Gulf @ Bellaire Causeway In addition the following critical. roadway segments were selected for detailed Level of Service analyses: E FIGURE 3. NET NEW AM BUILD OUT VOLUMES .TRANSPORTATION SOLUTIONS 10 L n t FIGURE 4. NET NEW PM BUILD OUT VOLUMES TRANSPORTATION SOLUTIONS 11 experience higher peaks at varying times of the day. Figures 5 and 6 summarize the existing AM and PM peak hour, peak season weekday demands on the roadways in the study area at selected locations. The detailed count data is provided in the Appendix as are the adjusted turning movements volumes used as the basis for future background traffic. Growth trends for traffic in the study area are difficult to estimate due to a number of recent changes to the roadway system such as the new Memorial Causeway Bridge and removal of the 19A designation for Fort Harrison, Additionally, major roadway construction in the Beach Walk tarea has had a significant effect on businesses both short term (construction disruptions) as well as long term (evidenced by the number of projects involving conversion of small hotels to condominiums). A comparison of 2006 counts to similar counts in 2007 indicates a possible 12 1 ❖ Mandalay Avenue from the Clearwater Beach Roundabout to Baymont Street •'• Memorial Causewa y from the Clearwater Beach Roundabout to Island Way ' ❖ Chestnut Street (EB) from the Memorial Causeway Bridge to Fort Harrison Avenue ❖ Court Street (WB) from Myrtle Avenue to Oak Avenue •'• Fort Harrison Avenue from Turner Street to Pierce Street Background Traffic tEstimates of future background traffic volumes were derived from existing traffic counts compiled by DKS from a number of sources. These include twenty-four hour machine counts collected by FDOT, Pinellas County and the City of Clearwater. Weekday AM, Midday and PM peak hour turning movement counts were performed by the City of Clearwater at the key intersections in the study area. These counts; taken in various months in 2007 and 2008 have been adjusted to peak season conditions using seasonal adjustment factors for Pinellas County, compiled by FDOT. While the adjusted counts reflect weekda y "peak season' conditions they do not reflect conditions that occur during the Spring Break period at Clearwater Beach, nor do they reflect weekend conditions during the summer or on holidays when beach traffic demands may experience higher peaks at varying times of the day. Figures 5 and 6 summarize the existing AM and PM peak hour, peak season weekday demands on the roadways in the study area at selected locations. The detailed count data is provided in the Appendix as are the adjusted turning movements volumes used as the basis for future background traffic. Growth trends for traffic in the study area are difficult to estimate due to a number of recent changes to the roadway system such as the new Memorial Causeway Bridge and removal of the 19A designation for Fort Harrison, Additionally, major roadway construction in the Beach Walk tarea has had a significant effect on businesses both short term (construction disruptions) as well as long term (evidenced by the number of projects involving conversion of small hotels to condominiums). A comparison of 2006 counts to similar counts in 2007 indicates a possible 12 slight decrease in traffic activity. Volumes reported on the Memorial Causeway Bridge in 2006 are at the same level reported in 2004 but below those reported in 2001. For the purpose of this analysis an annual growth factor of 1% was applied to the existing volumes assuming a 20 year planning period. Traffic generated by the approved development projects were added onto these adjusted volumes to provide an estimate of the anticipated 2027 background conditions. Traffic generated by potential redevelopment sites at the alternative density levels (including "Build Out ") was added on to the 2027 background conditions to provide the total estimated volumes associated with the alternative redevelopment scenarios. 1 Level of Service Evaluations Level of service analyses were performed for Existing, Background and Build Out conditions at ithe key intersections and roadway segments previously identified. The initial set of evaluations used existing roadway geometries and control devices (i.e., signal timings, stop signs and yield signs) to determine current and background operating conditions. The Synchro /SimTraffic software was used to calculate intersection delay and average link travel speeds for the critical telements of the roadway system. Tables 6 and 7 provide a summary of the analyses for each of three development scenarios. i The analyses indicate unacceptable Levels of Service (E and below) are projected at Build Out for two intersections: i❖ Chestnut Street @ Fort Harrison Avenue —The intersection is projected to operate at Level of Service E under Build Out conditions (PM peak hour). ❖ Court Street @ Fort Harrison Avenue— The intersection is projected to operate at Level of Service E under build out conditions (both AM and PM peak hour). Based upon the analysis of alternative redevelopment scenarios, Level of Service E begins to occur at these two intersections at the redevelopment density level of 70 rooms /acre (1333 net inew hotel rooms). 13 As a result of these intersection deficiencies the following links are anticipated to operate at unacceptable Levels of Service also: ❖ Fort Harrison Avenue from Turner Street to Pierce Street (NB and SB) —Level of Service E conditions begin in the PM peak hour at the development density level of 70 rooms /acre (1333 net new hotel rooms). ❖ Chestnut Street from Memorial Causeway Bridge to Fort Harrison Avenue (EB) —Level of Service E conditions begin in the PM peak hour at the development density level of 90 rooms /acre (1664 net new hotel rooms). ❖ Court Street from Myrtle Avenue to Oak Avenue (WB) —Level of Service E conditions begin in the AM and PM peak hour with the 2027 background traffic (Approved Development only). The analysis of conditions at the Clearwater Roundabout was performed using the simulation capabilities of the Synchro /Sim Traffic model. Level of Service was determined using the same average vehicle delay criteria as used for signalized intersections. The simulation indicated, while significant increases in congestion are anticipated under Build Out for the weekday PM Iconditions, the overall delay is comparable to LOS D for a traffic signal. IMitiLyation Requirements An investigation of potential mitigation measures has been performed for the deficient intersections. The purpose was to identify capacity related improvements which would result in Level of Service D or better for the build out conditions. The following summarizes the needed improvements. ' Chestnut Street at Fort Harrison - -In order to provide additional capacity, the south leg of the intersection will need to be restriped to create an additional NB right turn lane. This will require elimination of the bicycle lane. Restriping of the northbound exit will be needed to provide the necessary transition across the intersection. 16 El 'I n Table 6 Summary of Intersection Level of Service Analvses Intersection Location and Scenario AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Total Entering Volume (vph) Average Vehicle Delay sec /veh Level of Service Total Entering Volume v h Average Vehicle Delay sec /veh Level of Service Clearwater Beach Roundabout Existing 1349 4.1 A 1862 6.3 A 2027 Background 2016 6.6 A 2695 11.7 B 2027 Build Out 2583 20.3 C 3429 48.9 D Mandalay Ba mont Existing 643 4.0 A 933 5.0 A 2027 Background 828 4.8 A 1159 5.8 A 2027 Build Out 919 4.8 A 1283 5.9 A Gulf Gulfview Three Way Stop Control Existing 575 2.6 A 781 3.2 A 2027 Background 784 3.4 A 1042 4.2 A 2027 Build Out 1023 470 A 1369 10.6 B Gulf @ Bellaire Causeway Existing 1198 7.2 A 1636 8.7 A 2027 Background 1526 7.7 A 2067 12.1 B 2027 Build Out 1747 9.0 A 2373 21.7 C Chestnut Fort Harrison Existing 2186 23.8 C 2719 26.3 C 2027 Background 2863 26.4 C 3460 39.1 D 2027 Build Out 3052 48.2 D 3838 63.9 E Court Fort Harrison Existing 2064 25.5 C 2412 25.8 C 2027 Background 2618 35.8 D 3118 47.7 D 2027 Build Out 2986 56.5 E 3460 74.6 E 17 Table 7 Summary of Arterial Level of Service Analvses Roadway Segment and Scenario AM Peak Hour PM Peak. Hour Average Travel Speed m h Level of Service Average Vehicle Delay sec /veh Level of Service NB Mandalay Avenue from the Clearwater Beach Roundabout to Ba mont Street - 0.3 miles Existing 30.0 A 30.0 A 2027 Background 25.0 B 24.0 B 2027 Build Out 25.0 B 21.0 B SB Mandalay Avenue from the Clearwater Beach Roundabout to Ba mont Street - 0.3 miles Existing 30.0 A 29.0 A 2027 Background 29.0 A 22.0 B 2027 Build Out 25.0 B 21.0 B EB Memorial Causeway from the Clearwater Beach Roundabout to Island Way 0.6 miles Existing 27.0 B 26.0 B 2027 Background 27.0 B 26.0 B 2027 Build Out 26.0 B 25.0 B WB Memorial Causeway fr om the Clearwater Beach Roundabout to Island Way 0.6 miles Existing 28.0 B 28.0 B 2027 Background 28.0 B 25.0 B 2027 Build Out 20.0 C 14.0 D EB Chestnut from Memorial Causeway Bridge to Fort Harrison - -.6 miles Existing 19.9 C 20.1 C 2027 Background 19.7 C 17.2 D 2027 Build Out 19.1 C 11.0 E WB Court from Myrtle Avenue to Oak Avenue - -.35 miles Existing 14.7 D 14.5 D 2027 Background 12.8 E 12.0 E 2027 Build Out 10.5 E 9.4 F NB Fort Harrison Avenue from Turner Street to Pierce Street -0.45 miles Existing 12.1 D 10.3 D 2027 Background 11.0 D 9.7 D 2027 Build Out 10.2 D 7.4 E SB Fort Harrison Avenue from Turner Street to Pierce Street -0.4 miles Existing 10.8 D 11.3 D 2027 Background 9.8 D 9.5 D 2027 Build Out 8.0 E 7.7 E In Court Street at Fort Harrison - -In order to provide additional capacity, the north leg of the intersection will need to be restriped to create an additional SB right turn lane. This will require ' elimination of the bicycle lane. Restriping of the southbound exit will be needed to provide the necessary transition across the intersection. 1 u An alternative design involving restriping the section of Fort Harrison to create a four lane undivided facility from just south of Chestnut Street to just north of Court Street could also be implemented. Lane control signage and striping would be needed to create exclusive left turn lanes (southbound at Chestnut Street and northbound at Court Street). Figures 7 and 8 illustrate these alternative mitigation concepts. Analysis of the recommended improvements indicates Level of Service D conditions can be maintained at these intersections and along the segments for the Build Out conditions. Tables 8 and 9 indicate the anticipated Levels of Service with the recommended improvements. 'Fable 8 Cnmmnry of TntPrQPetinn T.PVP1 of CPrvirP Ann1vvPC with Mitiun tin n Intersection Location and Scenario AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Total Entering Volume (v ph) Average Vehicle Delay sec /veh Level of Service Total Entering Volume v h Average Vehicle Delay sec /veh Level of Service Chestnut @ Fort Harrison 2027 Build Out 3052 25.4 C 3838 40.4 1 D Court Fort Harrison 2027 Build Out 2986 33.2 C 3460 47.4 D 19 FIGURE 7. FORT HARRISON MITIGATION CONCEPT TfiANSFORTATIO14 SOLUTIONS 20 FIGURE 8. FORT HARRISON MITIGATION CONCEPT DKS Associates, (Four Lane Alternative) TRANSPORTATION SOLUTIONS 21 0 n 0 u I u 11 Table 9 iummary of Arterial i.evel of Cervire Analvsec with Miti¢ation Roadway Segment and Scenario AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Average Travel Sneed m h Level of Service Average Vehicle Dela sec /veh Level of Service EB Chestnut from Memorial Causeway Bridge to Fort Harrison - -.6 miles 2027 Build Out 120.7 1 C 114.3 D WB Court from Myrtle Avenue to Oak Avenue - -.45 miles 2027 Build Out 15.2 1 D 14.6 D NB Fort Harrison Avenue from Turner Street to Pierce Street -0.4 miles 2027 Build Out 9.9 1 D 9.2 D SB Fort Harrison Avenue from Turner Street to Pierce Street -0.4 miles 2027 Build Out 10.2 1 D 9.2 D Summary Analysis of land use patterns in the study area has identified the potential for significant redevelopment of property for hotel land use under an increase in the maximum allowable densities. The impact of the potential redevelopment on the roadway system has been evaluated to identify the improvements needed to maintain acceptable Levels of Service under varying density alternatives. The results indicate an additional 2,210 hotel rooms (825 in the Sand Key District and 1,385 distributed throughout the Clearwater Beach Districts) could be accommodated with capacity improvements at the intersections of Chestnut Street and Fort Harrison Avenue and Court Street ' and Fort Harrison. These capacity improvements involve restriping of the south approach of Fort Harrison at Chestnut Street and the north approach of Fort Harrison at Court Street to create ' exclusive right turn lanes. Adjustments to lane use signage and signal timings will be needed to effect the lane use changes. An alternative design involving the restriping of Fort Harrison to ' create two lanes in each direction from Chestnut to Court would result in an equivalent operational improvement. Either of the restriping alternatives would result in the loss of the existing bicycle lane along this ' section of Fort Harrison Avenue. The marked bike lane on the east side of Ft. Harrison Avenue 22 ' will be tied into the new east west bike trail running along Turner Street from the Pinellas Trail to the Bay Avenue and ultimately the Memorial Causeway Trail. This will serve the purpose of ' the original bike lane on Ft. Harrison that terminated at Court Street. With either of these improvements, acceptable Levels of Service can be maintained on all of the major intersections and roadway segments in the study area under the "Build Out" development scenario. 23 1 1 1 BELLEVIEW BILTMORE CABANA CLUB TRAFFIC STUDY Submitted to: The City of Clearwater Prepared for: Belleview Biltmore Owner, LLC Legg Mason Real Estate investors 10880 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 1750 Los Angeles, California 90024 Submitted through: R.J. Heisenbottle Architects, P.A. 2199 Ponce De Leon Boulevard, Suite 400 Coral Gables, Florida 33134 Prepared Under the Supervision of: Roy E. Chapman, P.E. FL Certification No. 34438 Florida Design Consultants, Inc. 3030 Starkey Boulevard New Port Richey, Florida 34655 (727) 849 -7588 Date: July 24, 2008 T:\2007 -0025 \Cabana Club \Traffic Study.doc 1.0 2.0 3.0 INTRODUCTION The Belleview Biltmore Cabana Club is located on Sand Key in the City of Clearwater, Florida. The existing facility at this location is a restaurant and beach club. It is proposed to replace these land uses with a hotel. This study was completed to document the existing hourly traffic volumes for the restaurant and beach club. In addition the study was completed to compare the traffic counts with the expected number of trips for the existing restaurant and with the proposed hotel using information from the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) informational report Trip Generation. EXISITNG AND PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT The existing facility provided at the Cabana Club is a restaurant that totals 7,653 square feet. This restaurant consists of the following dimensions: In addition, the facility serves as a beach club for the patrons of the Belleview Biltmore Hotel. This facility will be demolished and will be replaced by a 38 room hotel that will include an accessory restaurant. EXISITNG TRAFFIC Contact was made with the restaurant operator and it was determined that the peak usage occurs on Friday and Saturday nights. Manual traffic counts were taken on these nights to determine the number of vehicles entering and exiting the existing Belleview Biltmore Cabana Club restaurant. Counts were taken on Friday, April 18, 2008, from 4:00 p.m. to 9:00 p.m. and on Saturday April 26, 2008, from 3:00 p.m. to 10:00 p.m. by Florida Design Consultants, Inc. The counts were taken with subtotals every 15 minutes, and the highest four consecutive 15- minute increments that were taken are the peak hour. The restaurant was contacted to make sure that there were no special events or functions during the time the counts were conducted to make sure that they occurred during a typical day. A count was tentatively scheduled for Saturday, April 19, 2008, but it was determined that the restaurant was reserved for a wedding parry, which would have skewed the count results. Therefore the count was delayed to April 26, 2008. 1 Size Location (Square Feet) Lower Level Lounge 102 Main Bar and Lounge 978 Main Dining Room 1,923 Kitchen 1,339 Private Dining Room 1,390 Outside Terrace (3`d Floor) 1,921 7,653 In addition, the facility serves as a beach club for the patrons of the Belleview Biltmore Hotel. This facility will be demolished and will be replaced by a 38 room hotel that will include an accessory restaurant. EXISITNG TRAFFIC Contact was made with the restaurant operator and it was determined that the peak usage occurs on Friday and Saturday nights. Manual traffic counts were taken on these nights to determine the number of vehicles entering and exiting the existing Belleview Biltmore Cabana Club restaurant. Counts were taken on Friday, April 18, 2008, from 4:00 p.m. to 9:00 p.m. and on Saturday April 26, 2008, from 3:00 p.m. to 10:00 p.m. by Florida Design Consultants, Inc. The counts were taken with subtotals every 15 minutes, and the highest four consecutive 15- minute increments that were taken are the peak hour. The restaurant was contacted to make sure that there were no special events or functions during the time the counts were conducted to make sure that they occurred during a typical day. A count was tentatively scheduled for Saturday, April 19, 2008, but it was determined that the restaurant was reserved for a wedding parry, which would have skewed the count results. Therefore the count was delayed to April 26, 2008. 1 Table 1 provides the results of the traffic count taken on Friday, April 18, 2008. The information provided indicates the 15- minute increment counts for inbound and outbound traffic with hourly totals. The hourly volumes ranged from a low of 23 vehicles from 4:00 to 5:00 p.m. to a high of 39 vehicles from 8:00 to 9:00 p.m. The 8:00 to 9:00 p.m. count also represents the peak hour (highest four consecutive 15- minute increments). This peak hour had 13 inbound and 26 outbound vehicles. The Saturday count, taken on April 26, 2008, is summarized in Table 2. These counts ranged from a low of 22 vehicles from 4:00 to 5:00 p.m. to a high of 43 vehicles for 8:00 to 9:00 p.m. The peak hour occurred between 6:45 and 7:45 p.m. with 45 vehicles; 25 inbound and 20 outbound. Trips for the existing restaurant at the Belleview Biltmore Cabana Club were also generated using Information from the ITE informational report Trip Generation, ' 7th Edition, 2003. The trips for the restaurant were generated using Quality Restaurant, Land Use Code 913. Based on the ITE information, the restaurant should generate 688 weekday daily trips, with 57 trips in the p.m. street peak hour ' and 69 p.m. peak hour trips in the peak hour of the generator. The street peak hour is the sum of the highest four consecutive 15- minute periods between 4:00 p.m. and 6:00 p.m. The peak hour of the generator (restaurant in this case) is the ' sum of the highest four consecutive 15- minute periods taken in the afternoon. On Saturday it would generate 722 daily trips and 83 trips in the peak hour of the generator. No information was available from the ITE source for the p.m. peak hour on a Saturday. The numbers of trips counted for the existing facility during the peak hour of the ' generator were compared with the volumes calculated using the ITE formulas. For the Friday p.m. peak hour of the generator 39 vehicles were counted, while the ITE method would estimate 69 trips. For the Saturday peak hour of generator, 45 trips were counted instead of the ITE estimate of 83 vehicles. 4.0 HOTEL TRAFFIC The trips to be generated by the hotel have also been estimated using information from the ITE informational report Trip Generation. The numbers of trips that will be generated on a weekday and on a Saturday on a daily basis and during the street peak and generator peak hours are identified in Table 3. On a weekday daily basis, the hotel will generate 339 trips, while the p.m. street peak hour will have 27 trips and the generator peak hour would have 30 trips. The daily trips on a Saturday are projected to be 399 trips and the peak hour of the generator is projected to have 33 trips. There was no information on the distribution of the trips entering and exiting for the Saturday peak hour. 5.0 TRIP COMPARISON ' A comparison has been made between the trips currently being generated by the existing land uses at the Belleview Biltmore Cabana Club and those for the proposed hotel operation. After reviewing the actual counts at this site and those projected for the existing and proposed land use using the ITE trip generation information, the following conclusions can be made: 1. The restaurant land use generates more traffic on a daily basis than the proposed hotel (688 daily trips versus 339 daily trips on a weekday). ' 2. The existing restaurant generates more traffic during the normal street peak period (4:00 to 6:00 p.m.) than the proposed hotel. 3. The trips for the restaurant are higher at later hours in the day than for the hotel. The Friday peak hour comes from 8:00 to 9:00 p.m. The Saturday peak ' hour occurs from 6:45 to 7:45 p.m. with 45 vehicles, which is almost matched by the 43 vehicles that came or left the site from 8:00 to 9:00 p.m. ' 4. The hotel land use is likely to have lower traffic volumes than the restaurant throughout the day and would not have as many vehicles entering or leaving the site in the evening. This is supported by the fact that the trip generation on a daily basis for the restaurant is 344 vehicles during a weekday and 361 on the weekend, while the hotel would have 170 weekday trips and 200 weekend trips per day. ' 6.0 CONCLUSION Based upon the above review, it has been demonstrated that the proposed 38 room hotel would have less traffic impact than the existing restaurant. 1 t Table 1. Belleview Biltmore Cabana Club e Friday Trip Count Counted by.- Florida Design Consultants, Inc. Date: 4118108, Friday PM Time 15 Minute Increment Hourly In Out Total In Out Total 4:00 -4:15 3 1 4 18 5 23 4:15 -4:30 9 2 11 4:30 -4:45 2 1 3 4:45 -5:00 4 1 5 5:00 -5:15 2 2 4 19 14 33 5 :15 -5:30 10 1 11 5:30 -5:45 4 3 7 5:45 -6:00 3 8 11 6:00 -6:15 3 1 4 19 8 27 6:15 -6:30 6 2 8 6:30 -6:45 7 2 9 6:45 -7'00 3 3 6 7 :00 -7:15 2 2 4 20 12 32 7 :15 -7:30 10 4 14 7 :30 -7:45 4 4 8 7 :45 -8:00 4 2 6 8 :00 -8:15 3 7 10 13 26 39 8:15 -8:30 4 7 11 8:30 -8:45 2 8 10 8:45 -9:00 4 4 8 Friday Peak Hour 8:00 - 9 :00 13 26 39 Source: FDC Date: 51712008 T.-12007- 00251Cabana Clubl[Cabana Club Tables.xls]Fri Table 2: Belleview Biltmore Cabana Club - Saturday Trip Count Counted by: Florida Design Consultants, Inc. Date: 4126108, Saturday PM Time 15 Minute Increment Hourly In Out Total In Out Total 3 :00 -3 :15 8 6 14 16 13 29 3 :15 -3 :30 3 3 6 3 :30 -3 :45 2 4 6 3 :45 -4 :00 3 0 3 4 :00 -4 :15 2 3 5 11 11 22 4 :15 -4 :30 1 1 2 4 :30 -4 :45 4 4 8 4 :45 -5 :00 4 3 7 5.00 -5 :15 3 4 7 19 16 35 5 :15 -5 :30 8 3 11 5 :30 -5 :45 1 7 8 5 :45 -6.00 7 2 9 6:00-6:15 2 1 3 16 13 29 6 :15 -6 :30 5 2 7 6 :30 -6 :45 2 3 5 6 :45 -7 :00 7 7 14 7 :00 -7 :15 7 5 12 20 16 36 7 :15 -7 :30 3 6 9 7 :30 -7:45 8 2 10 7 :45 -8 :00 2 3 5 8 :00 -8 :15 5 8 13 19 24 43 8 :15 -8 :30 7 6 13 8 :30 -8 :45 4 8 12 8 :45 -9 :00 3 2 5 9 :00 -9 :15 3 2 5 10 15 25 9 :15 -9 :30 2 4 6 9 :30 -9 :45 1 5 6 9 :45 -10 :00 4 4 8 Saturday Peak Hour 6 :45 - 7:45 25 20 45 Source: FDC Date: 51712008 T.*12007- 00251Cabana Club1[Cabana Club Tables.xls]Fri m = = = = = = = = = = = r Table 3. Belleview Biltmore Cabana Club Trip Generation Land Use Quality Restaurant ITE LUC 931 Size 7,6531 Units S . Ft. Time Period Weekday Saturday Inbound Outbound Total Inbound Outbound Total Daily 344 344 688 361 361 722 PM Peak Hour 38 19 57 n/a n/a n/a PM Peak Hour of Generator 43 26 69 49 34 83 Hotel (Occupied Rooms ) 310 38 I Room Daily 170 169 339 200 199 399 PM Peak Hour, 13 14 27 n1a n/a n/a PM Peak Hour of Generator 1 17 13 30 1 1 n/a n/a 33 Source: ITE Trip Generation, Seventh Edition, 2003 Date: 517108 T:12007- 00251Cabana C1ubl[Cabana Club Tables.xls]Fri It a� x a 00 C A'+ �C y www.timhaahs.com TIMOTHY HAAHS & ASSOCIATES, INC. 10305 N.W. 41' Street, Suite 201 Miami, FL 33178 T. 305.592.7123 F. 305.592.7113 August 5, 2008 To: Mr. Richard J Heisenbottle, AIA RJ Hesinbottle Architects 340 Minorca Ave., Suite 10 Coral Gables, Florida 33134 RE: Cabana Club — Belleview Biltmore TimHaahs Project No. MIA07109 The Cabana Club at the Belleview Biltmore Hotel & Resort is a 38 -room hotel with 4,981 SF of on -site restaurant space and 56 parking spaces (3 of which are handicap). The club also includes one loading space for deliveries and back of house operations. We have analyzed the parking requirements for the Cabana Club and have created the following parking model: Programming Proposed Shared - Parking Demand Factors 1 space /room key —Based on 90% Hotel 38 -keys 24 Occupancy, 70% Drive Ratio, 100% peak hour adjustment. 10 spaces /1,000 sq.ft. — Based on 90% Restaurant 4,981 sq.ft. 14 peak hour adjustment, 70% captive adjustment typical for resorts. Total 38 After calibrating our shared parking model for this specific resort in this geographic location, we have identified the peak parking demand would occur at 9 pm on a weekend (Saturday) with a need for 38 parking spaces. It is our opinion that the planned 56 parking spaces would adequately support the parking demand at the Cabana Club given the assumptions listed above. PLANNING 1 ENGINEERING 1 ARCHITECTURE 1 PARKING Mr. Richard Heisenbottle, AIA RJ Heisenbottle Architects August 5, 2008 If on a rare occasion, the hotel should experience a 95% drive ratio and the restaurant experience a 60% captive adjustment, we estimate the peak hour demand to increase to 42 spaces, still under the capacity of the proposed parking area. Therefore, it is our opinion that 42 spaces would satisfy the needs for the Cabana Club on most days and 56- spaces is expected to meet the demand needs on the highest peak days. If additional parking is needed beyond the typical or peak, vehicles can be parked using a valet operation thereby increasing the lot capacity by 20 percent or from 56 spaces to 67 spaces. This results in a surplus of 29 spaces over the typical peak parking demand and a surplus of 25 spaces over the special occasion peak demand. If you have any further questions, please do not hesitate to contact myself or Roamy Valera. Sincerely, f Tir�H� s Vicky agliano Parking Specialist f Tir�H� s r C b a� 0 C UQ p A'+ °C W' Legend EP- Preservation R /OS- Recreation /Open Space RFH Resort Facilities High ERH- Residential High ERM- Residential Medium ECG- Commercial General fiffl TU - Transportation /Utility Do to obtained from the City of Clearwater and Pinellas County. CG Project Gulf Of Mexico 0 0 Ir�J Intracoastal Waterway L Sand Key Future Land Use Map Legend EP- Preservation 7 OS /R - Open Space /Recreation ET- Tourist EB- Business EHDR- High Density Residential F1MDR - Medium Density Residential ■ I - Instutional EC- Commercial Data otained from the City of Clearwater Gulf of Mexico IProject Site — ,W. I DR/7� -—� If If If I( 1)(J"iuI �11,rtlr- 11111uy SAND KEY CONDOMINIUM HOMESTEAD ANALYSIS West Side +,° '-,.yy 4*"',�+3F " "f ,.. Prolept Name „� .' ° .. :.• ^, "o 'a'Y! °!" . .: /' Pr „Adtlress x1 . "mod "'.N°t , , � P i cei lC),, Ho ri`eSteadecti $ {, To a Untts Pct ... J? Haines eaded r°k ng Flodrs„ 2e iden al 8 _ The Grande on Sand Key 1170 Gulf Blvd 17/29/15/32877 105 235 44.68% 1 42 (21 per tower) Meridian on Sand Key 1200 Gulf Blvd 17/29/15/57318 55 106 51.89% 1 20 Landmark Towers One 1230 Gulf Blvd 20/29/15/49851 29 143 20.28% 1 18 Landmark Towers Two 1250 Gulf Blvd 20/29/15/49852 15 72 20.83% 1 9 Harbour Light Towers 1270 Gulf Blvd 20/29/15/36700 36 136 26.47% 2 17 Lighthouse Towers Condo 1290 Gulf Blvd 19/29/15/51762 42 144 29.17% 1 18 Crescent Beach Club Two 1310 Gulf Blvd 19129/15/18793 35 120 29.17% 1 17 Crescent Beach Club One 1340 Gulf Blvd 19/29/15/18791 35 120 29.17% 1 17 Utopia Condo 1350 Gulf Blvd 19/29/15/93555 5 28 17.86% 1 8 Bella Rosa Condo 1370 Gulf Blvd 19/29/15/06367 10 31 32.26% 1 8 Clearwater Sand Key -Club No. 1 1380/1390 Gulf Blvd 19/29/15/16526 42 105 40.00% 1 13 Sand Key Condo -South Beach 1 1400 Gulf Blvd 19129/15/78638 34 95 35.79% 1 8 Sand Key Condo -South Beach II 1430 Gulf Blvd 19/29/15/78639 44 95 46.32% 1 8 Sand Key Condo -South Beach 1460 Gulf Blvd 19/29/15/78638 58 141 41.13% 1 12 Sand Key Condo -South Beach 1480 Gulf Blvd 19/29/15/78630 52 135 38,52% 1 12 Ultimar One Condo 1520 Gulf Blvd 19/29/15/93390 39 114 34.21% 1 16 Ultimar Two Condo 1540 Gulf Blvd 19/29/15/93391 46 135 34.07% 1 19 Ultimar Three Condo 1560 Gulf Blvd 19/29/15/93392 47 100 47.00% 1 19 Cabana Club Condo 1582 Gulf Blvd 19/29/15/12936 37 89 41.57% 2 (1 per tower) 16 (8 per tower) Belleview Biltmore Cabana Club 1590 Gulf Blvd 19/29/15/00000 Dan's Island on Sand Key 1660 Gulf Blvd 30/29/15/20262 82 169 48.52% 1 11 WEST SIDE 848 2313 36.66% East Side n :.- t R t .. >4, -`a5 : r:., 3 a; . . �,L Pro ect A;tire •"P 1' ' U% �5•: ". ° :: - ii it l!U' . . iLlC,a Ny„+.: r . A"Gr , .v... .gin 1:5. P � . , - 4'�Y`2 4, " %., ' ... Tota�„Uhtts�, Pct' �Iamesteade P�"kngfoots enii�� loor's, Bayside Gardens 4 1301 Gulf Blvd 20/29/15/78636 16 38 , 42.11% „r,�tes 0 2 and 3 Bayside Gardens 3 1351 Gulf Blvd 19/29/15/78635 16 38 42.11% 0 2 and 3 Bayside Gardens 1 1401 Gulf Blvd 19/29/15/78633 15 38 39.47% 0 2 and 3 Bayside Gardens 2 1451 Gulf Blvd 19/29/15/78634 18 38 47.37% 0 2 and 3 Clearwater Key -South Bay 1501 Gulf Blvd 19/29/15/78643 34 64 53.13% 1 8 The Harbour 1581 Gulf Blvd 19/29/15/36699 23 66 34.85% 1 7 Marina del Rey 1591 Gulf Blvd 19/29/15/36699 23 64 35.94% 1 7 Isle of Sand Key Condo 1621 Gulf Blvd 30/29/15/43515 58 124 46.77% 0 16 The Moorings of Sand Key Sand Key Estates Dr /Ct 30/29/15/58920 47 66 71.21% 1 EAST SIDE 250 536 46.64% Sources: Homestead data obtained from Pinellas County Property Appraiser. Building heights based on FDC Height Study. 9/11/08 F DC- FSI.VOL2: Prod: Plan: Bel Ieview Biltmore Cabana 263: RevisedCondoHeight - Homesteads.xls = ==Now m m m m m m m rw m m m m mm SAND KEY BUILDING. ANALYSIS SUMMARY TABLE �?�' [ir�^f py�� _ ,�; . ��,✓�l �'� f yY - . �' � .:�?;� ".io".rldi � � ry� ,r ... '.�,"f`.a�� - `� ` ' ;::f x z . . -� .t,. rsr _. ,t` a,��'s3 � Bmlt k .K� �r„�;rs� r�f;`,j..3is� . Ad ac t to'or u y y� ix v`T.:L !' N i 3'- �i� � mSiy:l' ?fit -E' .�, t .� 5` ,r'. ^ Y J '.4k + �,, 4 .i ,y � ,'¢� y Y ^"S"' ✓.x_ "J' .+�t'l / 5 � y; 'N"1 1 .J" L,yy T .. Tr✓ -. i . fif y. x N.er...v". 1 S ee$w• a":":^yy � N 1'N � }' Y✓iXa'i.% k Ir 2::;1 S' _..:Y.yF✓54 "�. � € "_' �a .... ,.::.a,is�'sc -Z Y'�h"'ffF�S n'3".a'y z FY £51'✓ n � � �S :�i^ �, x. , ,..: ..,e „[ ; ��.:. i i r �,zr.!_ ,... ,�✓M.: `'[y'A,'•��,Et f`?' Yom. 'Jk.,..� T .,, - .J/ ,. / ; f ic, E/ A , ..,Gf, ;Y. s'",� . , , i . v � � ��;'; r xss,,. k,f »f., <' -.-?' 3.. t'y. >5 4 . $ N t �l "£' !.'" � E Yy ' . t e J�",s . � e . 1 Belleview Biltmore 19- 29 -15- 00000 - 340 -0110 1983 YES - Building, pool Cabana Club deck adjacent 1590 Gulf Blvd. 2 Cabana Club Condo 19- 29 -15- 12936- 000 -0001 1984 YES- Building, 1582 & 1586 Gulf Blvd. pool & deck adjacent 3 Ultimar Three Condo 19- 29 -15- 93392 - 000 -0001 1995 YES- Building, 1560 Gulf Blvd. Pool & deck adj acent 4 Ultimar Two Condo 19- 29 -15- 93391- 000 -0001 1992 YES - Building 1540 Gulf Blvd. adjacent 5 Ultimar One Condo 19- 29 -15- 93390 - 000 -0001 1991 YES- Building, 1520 Gulf Blvd. pool & deck adjacent 6 Sand Key Condo — South 19- 29 -15- 78630 - 000 -0102 1982 YES - Building & Beach parking adjacent 1480 Gulf Blvd. 7 Sand Key Condo — South 19- 29 -15- 78637 - 000 -0001 1980 YES- Building & Beach Parking adjacent 1460 Gulf Blvd. 8 Sand Key Condo — South 19- 29 -15- 78639 - 000 -0001 1974 YES- Building & Beach II parking adjacent 1430 Gulf Blvd. 9 Sand Key Condo — South 19- 29 -15- 78638 - 000 -0002 1973 YES - Building, Beach I 19- 29 -15- 78638 -000 -1010 Pool deck & 1400 Gulf Blvd. parking lot adjacent 10 Clearwater Sand Key — 19- 29 -15- 16526- 000 -0001 1974 YES- Building, Club No. 1 parking lot & 1380 Gulf Blvd. garage adjacent 11 Bella Rosa Condo 19- 29 =15- 06367- 000 -0001 2004 YES - Building 1370 Gulf Blvd. adjacent 12 Utopia Condo 19- 29 -15- 93555- 000 -0001 2005 YES- Building 1350 Gulf Blvd. adjacent 13 Crescent Beach Club One 19 -29 -15 -18791 -000 -0001 1986 YES - Building Condo adj acent 1340 Gulf Blvd. 14 Crescent Beach Club Two 19- 29 -15- 18793- 000 -0206 1989 YES- Building Condo adjacent 1310 Gulf Blvd. 15 Lighthouse Towers Condo 19- 29- 15- 51762- 000 -0001 1983 YES- Building, 1290 Gulf Blvd. Pool & parking adjacent Tennis courts and clubhouse west of CCCL 16 Harbour Light Towers 20- 29 -15- 36700 - 000 -0001 1974 YES - Building & Condominium Amended parking adjacent 1270 Gulf Blvd. 17 Landmark Towers Two 20- 29 -15- 49852- 000 -0001 1981 YES- Building & Condo parking adjacent 1250 Gulf Blvd. 18 Landmark Towers One 20- 29 -15- 49851- 000 -0001 1980 YES - Building & Condo parking adjacent 1230 Gulf Blvd. 19 Meridian on Sand Key 17 -29 -15 -57318 -000 -0001 2000 YES - Building Condo adjacent 1200 Gulf Blvd. Pool and clubhouse west of CCCL 20 The Grande on Sand Key 17- 29 -15- 32877 - 001 -0001 1997 YES - Building Condo Adjacent 1180 Gulf Blvd. Pool and clubhouse west of CCCL 21 Dans Island on Sand Key 30- 29 -15- 20262 - 000 -0001 1982 YES- Building & Condo Pool adjacent 1660 Gulf Blvd. Sources: 1. Condominium name, address and Parcel I.D. number based on Pinellas County Property Appraiser's Data. 2. Location of improvements for Parcels 1, 2, 4, 5, 11 and 21 based on field survey location by FDC surveyors on February 1.2, 2008. Location of improvements for all other parcels based on FDC interpretation of aerial photography. 'Summary of Building Analysis 21 Sites total 21 Sites with Habitable Permanent Improvements built adjacent to the CCCL ' 3 sites with Permanent Improvements build seaward/ west of the CCCL. Permanent improvements include tennis courts, clubhouses and swimming pools (See Sites 15, 19 ' and 20). ' CONDOMINIUMS ' Owners Cabana Club Condominium ' Results Of Vote On Legg Mason Building The Hotel: As you are aware, you have received an information package that I sent you, a Ballot and a ' second information package with an opposing view. The results of the vote are decisive. ' A: I ACCEPT the Belleview Biltmore development plan as currently presented. 74.26�o B: I DO NOT ACCEPT the Belleview Biltmore development plan as currently presented and I authorize the Board to fight the development plan using association funds and board time. 255.8 The owners have mandated that the board will not use association funds and 'or board time to fight the development plan. For your information. ' George A. N itrovich President ' Cabana Club Condominium Association n 1582 Gulf Boulevard ^ Clearwater, Florida 33767 Phone 727 -596 -5031 , Fax 727 -595 -1247 ° E -Mail: CabanaCiub@verizon_net RESULTS OF LEGG MASON VOTE 1. Total Vote As A Percent Of Respondents By Building BUILDING #1 BUILDING #2 A: B: TOTAL A: B: TOTAL Count 32 12 44 14 4 18 Percent 72.7%27.3%100.0% 77.8%22.2%100.0% 2. Total Vote As A Percent Of Respondents For Both Building BOTH BUILDING A: B: TOTAL Count 46 16 62 Percent 74.2%25.8%100.0% 3. Total Vote As A Percent Of Owners BOTH BUILDING A: B: TOTAL Count 46 16 90 Percent 51.1%17.5%68.9% 4. Number Of Owners That Did Not Vote Count 28 Percent 31.1% 1`TOTE: A: I ACCEPT the Belleview Biltmore development plan as currently presented. B: I DO NOT ACCEPT the Belleview Biltmore development plan as currently presented and I authorize the Board to fight the development plan using association funds and board time. 020,8 Honda Design Consultants, Inc. PLAN /Bellevlew UK- Cabara 263 /Re,BldgHts Exhiblt.al 8/062008 SSURVEY OF SAND KEY BUILDING HEIGHTS SUNINL4,RY TABLE GULF BOULEVARD RESIDENTIAL AND HOTEL SITES Ap eX_ ld Sheraton Sand Key 17-29-15-00000-330-0100 0- Parking 1.160 Gulf Blvd. 8 -Hotel 2 The Grande on Sand Key 17- 29 -15- 32877 -001 -0001 1997 2 buildings: Condo 1- Parking each 1180 Gulf Blvd. 21- Residential each 3 Meridian on Sand Key 17-29-15-57318-000-0001 2000 1- Parking Condo 20-Residential 1200 Gulf Blvd. 4 Landmark Towers One 20- 29 -15- 49851- 000 -0001 1980 1- Parking Condo 18-Residential 1230 Gulf Blvd. 5 Landmark Towers Two 20-29-15-49852-000-0001 1981 1- Parking Condo 9-Residential 1250 Gulf Blvd. 6 Harbour Light Towers 20-29-15-36700-000-0001 1974 2-Parking Condominium Amended 17-Residential 1270 Gulf Blvd. 7 Lighthouse Towers Condo 19-29-15-51762-000-0001 1983 1- Parking 1290 Gulf Blvd. 18-Residential 8 Crescent Beach Club Two 19-29-15-18793-000-0206 1989 1- Parking Condo 17-Residential 1310 Gulf Blvd. 9 Crescent Beach Club One 19- 29- 15- 18791- 000 -0001 1986 1- Parking Condo 17-Residential 1340 Gulf Blvd. 10 Utopia Condo 19-29-15-93555-000-0001 2005 1- Parking 1350 Gulf Blvd. 8-Residential 11 Bella Rosa Condo 19-29-15-06367-000-0001 2004 1- Parking 1370 Gulf Blvd. 8-Residential 12 Clearwater Sand Key — 19-29-15-16526-000-0001 1974 1- Parking Club No. I 13-Residential 1380 Gulf Blvd. 13 Sand Key Condo — South 19-29-15-78638-000-0002 1973 1- Parking Beach 1 .19- 29 -15- 78638 - 000 -1010 8-Residential 1400 Gulf Blvd. 14 Sand Key Condo — South 19-29-15-78639-000-0001 1974 1- Parking Beach 11 8-Residential 1430 Gulf Blvd. 15 Sand Key Condo — South 19-29-15-78637-000-0001 1980 1- Parking Beach 12-Residential 1460 Gulf Blvd. J 'J n L '1 16 Sand Key Condo — South 19- 29 -15- 78630 - 000 -0102 1982 1- Parking Beach 12- Residential 1480 Gulf Blvd. 17 Ultimar One Condo 19- 29 -15- 93390 - 000 -0001 1991 1- Parking 1520 Gulf Blvd. 16- Residential 18 Ultimar Two Condo 19- 29 -15- 93391 - 000 -0001 1992 1- Parking 1540 Gulf Blvd. 19- Residential 19 Ultimar Three Condo 19- 29 -15- 93392 -000 -0001 1995 1- Parking 1560 Gulf Blvd. 19- Residential 20 Cabana Club Condo 19- 29 -15- 12936 - 000 -0001 1984 2 buildings: 1582 & 1586 Gulf Blvd. 1- Parking each 8- Residential each 21 Belleview Biltmore 19- 29 -15- 00000 - 340 -0110 1983 1- Parking Cabana Club 2- Commercial 1590 Gulf Blvd. 22 Dan's Island on Sand Key 30- 29 -15- 20262 - 000 -0001 1982 2 buildings: Condo 1- Parking each 1660 Gulf Blvd. 11- Residential each I I I I I I I I I I I I INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY RESIDENTIAL AND HOTEL SITES M M11 W41 eari IR R, A Marriott Hotel 20-29-15-73427-000-0010 1989 0- Parking 1241 Gulf Blvd. 9-Residential B Bayside Gardens 4 20-29-15-78636-000-0001 1974 0- Parking .1351 Gulf Blvd. 2 & 3-Residential C Bayside Gardens 3 19-29-15-78635-000-0001 1974 0- Parking 1351 Gulf Blvd. 2 & 3- Residential D Bayside Gardens 1 19-29-15-78633-000-0001 1972 0- Parking 1401 Gulf Blvd. 2 & 3-Residential E Bayside Gardens 2 19-29-15-78634-000-0001 1973 0- Parking 1401 Gulf Blvd. 2 & 3-Residential F Clearwater Key-South Bay 19-29-15-78643-000-0001 1980 1- Parking 1501 Gulf Blvd. 8-Residential G Harbour Condominium 19-29-15-36699-000-0001 -1980 2 buildings: 1581 & 1591 Gulf Blvd. 1- Parking each 7-Residential each H Marina del Rey 19-29-15-55303-000-0001 1980 1 -Parking Marina del Rey Court 2-Residential Multiple Buildings I Isle of Sand Key Condo 30-29-15-43515-000-0001 1974 0- Parking 1621 Gulf Blvd. 16-Residential i The Moorings of Sand Key 30-29-15-58920-000-0001 1993 1- Parking Sand Key Estates Drive 2-Residential Multiple Buildings Data Sources: Pinellas County Property Appraiser's Office and Field study of building heights. Research by: Cyndi Tarapani and Tim Dohrman, Florida Design Consultants Prepared June 11, 2008 IK:\Bellcvicw Biltmorc\Cabana Club\Rcports\Sand Key Building Heights Table.doc I = = = m = = w = = = = m = = = i !2008 Fonda Design Consultant, inc crlwseaei�eiam„caeanazs3feaqHnacwo,code.ai e10620oa a� 0 Cn 4— 0 a� E c 25 20 15 10 5 16, Sand Key Building Height Comparison ? ��J`\o�i c � C^ Q Source: FDC Building Heights Study 2008 number of buildings LO -Ij CO CO CO CO Cb A,J Cb CIDJ number of buildings M M M M� M M M M M M M w M M M M M M 25 20 a� `0 15 0 L- W E 10 n c 5 W Immediate Vicinity Sand Key Building Height Comparison � O � H oco Oa o '1,0 Caro � o` F� o` FrD�oc C��O Q o�?@� 0,�m A B C D E F .;` Q Source: FDC Building Heights Study 2008 1 n t u SUMMARY OF UNITS WITH VIEW AMENITY IMPACT BUILDING TOTAL UNITS PARTIALLY IMPACTED UNITS Cabana Club Condominium 89 0 (to north) Dan's Island 169 0 (to south) Harbour South 33 9 (to east) Isle of Sand Key 124 6 (to southeast) TOTAL 415 15 4% OF TOTAL UNITS Sources: Total number of units obtained from Pinellas County Property Appraiser. Number of Partially Impacted Units based on Clarizio Consulting Report. r L� 1 September 9, 2008 Ms. Cyndi Tarapani, Vice President Florida Design Consultants 3030 Starkey Boulevard New Port Richey, Florida 34655 RE: SAND KEY BEACH NOURISHMENT PROGRAM CABANA CLUB REDEVELOPMENT Dear Ms. Tarapani: I am writing to confirm our telephone conversation regarding the redevelopment of the Cabana Club on the Beach Renourishment Program for Pinellas County. As you have described it to me, the Cabana Club is located at 1590 Gulf Boulevard, Clearwater, Florida. The Cabana Club currently operates as a restaurant and beach club for guests of the Belleview Biltmore Hotel in Belleair, Florida. The property owner proposes to redevelop the site with a 38 -room hotel and accessory restaurant. This proposed redevelopment will not have any effect on the ability of Pinellas County to request and receive federal funding for beach renourishment. I also would like to clarify the meaning of the Erosion Control Line (ECL) as applied to the site. When the ECL is surveyed, it becomes the demarcation between the public beach and private property and title to all lands located seaward of the ECL becomes vested with the State of Florida. The ECL for this site along with other beach property along Sand Key was surveyed and recorded on February 26, 1997. Therefore, since February 26, 1997, all lands seaward of the ECL are vested with the State of Florida; all lands landward of the ECL are property of the upland property owner. Finally, any construction that occurs seaward of the Coastal Construction Control Line (CCCL) requires a permit for the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) Bureau of Beaches and Coastal Systems. Please do not hesitate to contact me at (727) 464 -3774 if you have additional questions. Sincerely, Nicole Elko, Ph.D_ Coastal Coordinator F �W W y H Y! b fD a n 0 r u n Position(s) /Affiliation(s): Educational Background: Honors & Awards: Richard J. Heisenbottle, FAIA R. J. Heisenbottle Architects, PA 2199 Ponce de Leon Blvd. Suite 400 Coral Gables, Florida 33134 U.S.A. Tel: 305 -446 -7799 Fax: 305 -446 -9275 E -mail: richard @rjha.net American Institute of Architects — Past President Miami Chapter, 1991 Dade Heritage Trust - Vice President, 2000 —2003; President 2004 -2006 National Trust for Historic Preservation League of Historic American Theaters Association for Preservation Technology City of Miami Historic and Environmental Preservation Board, 1989 - 1999 Vice President, Spillas Candela & Partners, DMJM, 1979 -1987 BS in Architectural Technology, New York Institute of Technology, 1974 BA in Architecture, University of Miami, 1984 NCARB; Registered Architect in Florida, New York, Alabama, Virginia 2007 AIA Florida, Merit Award of Excellence Colony Theater Restoration 2007 Florida Trust for Historic Preservation Award Temple Court Apartments 2007 Florida Trust for Historic Preservation Award Colony Theater — Adaptive Re -use 2007 Miami Design Preservation League Barbara Capitman Award Colony Theater Restoration 2006 The Colony Theater Outstanding Preservation Project Award Dade Heritage Trust 2005 Lou Rawls Center for the Performing Arts AIA Miami Award Finalist 2004 Florida Trust for Historic Preservation Award City of Miami City Hall 2003 Silver Medal Award for Design — AIA Miami Chapter 2003 Bienal Miami + Beach Certificate of Award Gusman Center for the Performing Arts n r r r 0 r. Richard J. Heisenbottle, FAIA 2003 AIA Florida, Merit Award of Excellence Gusman Center for the Performing Arts 2003 Florida Trust for Historic Preservation, Florida Preservation Award 2003 Gusman Center for the Performing Arts 2003 Dade Heritage Trust, Outstanding Contribution to Historic Preservation Gusman Center for the Performing Arts 2003 Dade Heritage Trust, Outstanding Contribution to Historic Preservation Pan American Airways Terminal — Miami City Hall 2003 AIA Miami, Award of Excellence for Design Gusman Center for the Performing Arts 2003 AIA Miami, Award of Merit for Design Pan American World Airways Terminal Miami City Hall Florida Trust for Historic Preservation 2001 Outstanding Achievement in the Field of Preservation Education /Media "One United Band ", the story of Miami Edison Middle School 1999 Dade Heritage Trust, Outstanding Preservation Project Gusman Center for the Performing Arts AIA -Miami Chapter, Historic Preservation Award Richard J. Heisenbottle, AIA 1998 AIA -Miami Chapter, Award of Excellence Kings Point Theater for the Performing Arts AIA -Miami Chapter, Award for Best Renovation Project Miami Edison Middle School 1997 National Trust for Historic Preservation, National Preservation Award Miami Edison Middle School 1997 Florida Trust for Historic Preservation Non - residential Rehabilitation Outstanding Achievement Miami Edison Middle School 1996 AIA -Fort Lauderdale Chapter Honorable Mention Kings Point Theater for the Performing Arts 1994 AIA -Miami Chapter, Award of Merit (Unbuilt Category) Miami Edison Middle School 1992 AIA -Miami Chapter, Award of Excellence (Unbuilt Category) The Coliseum AIA -Miami Chapter, Award of Excellence (Built Category) AIA -Miami Chapter, Award of Merit for Design Freedom Tower 1990 AIA Florida, Award for Excellence in Architecture (Built Category) Freedom Tower Commercial Renovator Magazine Commercial Renovator of the Year Freedom Tower Richard J. Heisenbottle, FAIA ' 1989 Florida Trust for Historic Preservation Outstanding Preservation Project ' Freedom Tower 1989 AIA -Miami Chapter, Award of Merit for Design Freedom Tower ' Select Project Publications: Blueprint Directory Architecture + Design + Real Estate ' "Discovering the Lost Colony" Reggie Ruddock, June /August 2006 pp 46 -51 Stage Directions Magazine — Annual Historic Theatre Issue ' Gusman Center for the Performing Arts July 2003 "Reinvigorating Our Schools" ' American Institute of Architects, 1998. p. 10. Florida A -E -C; Construction Market Data ' A -E -C Interview "Richard Heisenbottle of R. J. Heisenbottle Architects" October 1998. pp.17 -19. Construction Market Data - Profiles "R. J. Heisenbottle, PA, Rebuilding Yesterday for Tomorrow" Kaye, Nancy. 7 September 1993. pp.14. ' Preservation Today "New Freedom for the Tower. Saving Miami's Historic Skyline" Thompson- Stewart, Louise. 1990. pp. 7 -9. Architectural Record "Southern Traditions" Pearson, Clifford A. March 1990. pp 66 -75_ Professional Activities: 11TH National Conference on Planning History Society for American City and Regional Planning History ' Coral Gables, FL October 2005 League of Historic American Theatres — Conference Presenter New York, NY July 2002 League of Historic American Theatres — Conference Leader Miami, FL July 2003 "Planning and Process in Historic Preservation" Workshop /Presentation League of Historic American Theater's 25th Anniversary Conference July 2001 "One United Band" Film documentary in conjunction with Public Television Channel, WLRN January 2000 Historic Sears Tower HABS Documentation, Restoration, and Construction Documents for Miami Dade County Performing Arts Center In conjunction with Cesar Pelli and Associates 1998 7 H 7 II C F W, OAR..,e & T.... Gerald C. Marston, FASLA Principal Mr. Marston is a landscape architect with over 35 years of experience as a practicing professional and educator. He currently leads the landscape architectural practice in the WRT Coral Gables office. Mr. Marston's professional background includes senior design and project management with three of the most prestigious planning and design firms in the United States. He has extensive and wide ranging experience in land planning and design for resort and waterfront properties, park and recreation master planning and design, community redevelopment and urban landscape design. EDUCATION Master of Landscape Architecture Harvard University Graduate School of Design, 1972 Bachelor of Science in Landscape Architecture Michigan State University (with honors), 1969 PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE Principal, Wallace Roberts & Todd, LLC Coral Gables, FL 2001 - present Partner, Wallace Roberts & Todd Coral Gables, FL 1996 -2000 Senior Associate, Wallace Roberts & Todd Vice President, WRT, Inc. Coral Gables, FL 1991 -1996 Senior Associate/ Sasaki Associates, Inc. Coral Gables, FL 1985 -1991 Vice President/ Edward D. Stone, Jr. and Associates Ft Lauderdale, FL 1981 -1985 Principal / WalquistlMarston Columbus, OH 1976 -1881 Landscape Architect/ Labrenz, Reimer, Inc. Columbus, OH 1974 -1975 Project Manager Sasaki, Dawson, DeMay Associates, Inc. Watertown, MA 1972 -1973 Landscape Architect Richard A. Gardiner & Associates, Inc. Cambridge, MA 1969 -1972 TEACHING EXPERIENCE Associate Professor of Landscape Architecture The Ohio State University 1973 -1981 Lecturer/ Design Critic Harvard Graduate School of Design The Catholic University University of Kentucky Texas A & M Kansas State University University of Florida University of Miami Florida International University PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATIONS Registered Landscape Architect in the States of Florida, Ohio and Missouri PROFESSIONAL MEMBERSHIPS American Society of Landscape Architects PUBLICATIONS / LECTURES Creating Neighborhood Character, ASLA National Convention, 1996 Gerald C. Marston, FASLA Art & Architecture - Miami Symposium, 1995, Center of Contemporary Arts, North Miami, FL "Thirty-five Years of Design on the Land," a Sasaki Associates Retrospective, University of Florida; 1990 HONORS AND AWARDS The American Society of Landscape Architects Merit Award, Overtown Pedestrian Mall, 1999 National Endowment for the Arts / U.S. Department of Transportation Merit Award, Overtown Pedestrian Mall, 1996 Florida Chapter, The American Society of Landscape Architects Merit Award, Overtown Pedestrian Mall, 1996 Intemational Downtown Association Merit Award, Overtown Pedestrian Mall, 1995 Ohio Chapter, American Society of Landscape Architects Merit Award, Land Rebom, 1975 The American Society of Landscape Architects Certificate of Merit Excellence in the Study of Landscape Architecture Michigan State University, 1969 REPRESENTATIVE TOURISM PROJECTS Cabo San Quintin, Baja California, Mexico Contributing Principal for this destination tourism project which involves a 2000 ac core resort component in addition to a regional integration planning study which studies the optimal introduction strategy of the resort project into the host community. The study area is located in a very ecologically complex setting where habitats range from Pacific Flyway nesting areas to Pacific coastal dunes to sensitive "fog desert" uplands to rich wetland fisheries bordering two inland bays. A thriving local oyster fishery operation combined with exponential growth projections for the local population made ecological sensitivity all the more critical. The resort project includes self - sufficient, green technologies for infrastructure systems and state -of- the -art resort amenities. A tightly clustered harbor village helps to concentrate residential and commercial development allowing significant areas of natural open space to be preserved. Liberty Cove, Sonora, Mexico Principal in Charge for a large scale resort —more than 40,000 acres —on the coast of the Sea of Cortez and the Sonoran Desert, Mexico. WRT collaborated with the client and other members of the consultant team to develop planning approaches and designs which seek to understand and take advantage of the qualities of the project site, pursue a state -of -the -art approach to sustainability and ecology, plan and design innovative and creative resort elements, create a sense of community that instills pride and builds value, and protect and enhance investor capital through comprehensive planning, high quality design and strategic, incremental project implementation. Initial programmatic investigations were set within a conceptual framework that draws inspiration and value from the unique landscape itself, allowing natural features to dictate where development should occur. Ritz Carlton Grenada, Grenada, West Indies Principal In Charge: WRT prepared landscape plans for a hotel and golf resort in Grenada that included a championship golf course, two marinas, Page 1 of 3 J 7 residential villas and townhouses, and a five -star hotel. The project was designed according to the latest technologies and principles of sustainable design, and was intended to complement and protect the adjacent habitat sanctuary of the endangered Grenada Dove Ocean City Boardwalk Renovation, Ocean City, MD Mr. Marston was PrinapalAn- Charge for the $2 million restoration of the oceanfront boardwalk and associated facilities. WRT prepared recommendations for the design and detailing that would convert an existing, deteriorated concrete promenade to its historic wooden form. In addition WRT prepared recommendations and designs for Entry Gateway Features, beachfront graphics logo and icons, specially themed pavement areas, and thematic site furnishings. Estero Island Streetscape, Fort Myers, Florida Project Director /Designer Following the adoption of a WRT prepared redevelopment plan for this nine mile long barrier island on Florida's west coast, WRT is prepared detailed design and construction documents for New Island entry signage, over one mile of urban roadway streetscape improvements and the creation of a pedestrian mall as the focus of the traditional resort entertainment district Beach Street U.S.A, Virginia Beach, VA Mr. Marston was Principoal -in- Charge in collaboration with local consultants to develop unique families of elements that would provide the district with a distinct identity. Families of elements including gateway features, performance venues, lighting, and paving with a distinctively lively feel and recalling indigenous community features. Lake Nona Mixed Use Resort Community, Orlando, Florida Gerald Marston was the Project Director /Designer while with E.D.S.A., Fort Lauderdale, Florida Lake Nona is a 6700 -acre mixed -use development with an emphasis on golf resort communities. The project was a development pioneer in the southeast quadrant of Orlando and is immediately adjacent to the expanding Orlando Intemational Airport The site abounds with natural features including more than 900 acres of pristine freshwater lakes. The first phase, Lake Nona Golf Club and Estates, includes an 18 -hofe Tom Fazio championship golf course and more than 100 luxury homesites. The club is recognized as one of Florida's best and is quickly establishing a quality image for future development. Antigua Resort Community, Antigua, British West Indies Gerald Marston was Project Director /Planner while with Sasaki Associates, Inc., Coral Gables, Florida The Antigua Resort Community was conceived as an adaptive re -use of an existing petroleum off loading and storage facility of approximately 80 acres. In order to compete with other waterfront oriented resorts on the island and in the Caribbean region, the concept included obtaining an additional 2000 acres of coastal property to serve as community beach front and marina amenities and a 200 acre expansion of upland facilities to include the development of a championship golf course and related housing. The core of the community which is to be developed on the existing site include a tourist resort commercial town center, a cricket academy and a meeting facility lodge associated with the golf club house. Disney Contemporary Resort Meeting Facility, Orlando, Florida Gerald Marston was Director/Project Landscape Architect while with Sasaki Associates, Inc., Coral Gables,Flodda. Master Planning and urban landscape architectural services were performed for the addition of a 120,000 S.F. meeting facility adjacent to the existing Contemporary Hotel at Walt Disney World. The entry plaza unites the porte- cocheres of both the hotel and meeting facility and provides a lively graphic textured urban piazza for mixed vehicular and pedestrian use. The central park is defined by allees of historic "dixie cup" oaks and features the cultural icon; a floral Mickey Mouse watch REPRESENTATIVE PARK PLANNING AND DESIGN PROJECTS Haulover Park Master Plan, Miami -Dade County, FL Gerald C. Marston, FASLA W. eA R..A —o & T ... � —a 40 WRT was retained by Miami -Dade County to prepare a Master Plan for Haulover Park, one of the County's most important regional parks. Haulover has served for decades as a prime beach attraction for residents and visitors, as well as offering a variety of recreation including golf, tennis, boating and fishing. In recent years the park has suffered from deterioration of some facilities and a decline in popularity. In developing the Master Plan, WRT examined a number of options for the golf program (including both traditional course and teaching facilities), beach revitalization and other park elements. WRT worked closely with County staff, municipal representatives and other stakeholders, as well as special consultants the National Golf Foundation, in developing and evaluating concepts. The Master Plan concept includes a re- located and expanded, special waterfront par 3 golf course; an enhanced and diversified beach experience; improved parking and circulation; an extensive waterfront promenade; an expanded marina and concession area; a conservation education facility; and a'great lawn" civic space for community events. Virginia Key Beach Park, Miami, FL Wallace Roberts & Todd's was selected by the Virginia Key Beach Park Trust to develop a General Plan for this urban beach park. A National Register of Historic Places site, the park is located on a barrier island that encompasses the last undeveloped ocean front property within the city limits. Virginia Key Beach Park was Dade County's only beach open to African Americans during the era of segregation and its establishment in response to a direct action protest by African American activists in 1945 was a significant and early victory in the Civil Rights movement. The Virginia Key Beach Park Trust formed to guide the city of Miami's plans for the development of this historically and ecologically significant site. Coral Gables War Memorial Youth Center, Coral Gables, FL. Partner in Charge / Lead Designer. WRT prepared a Master Plan for the renovation and expansion of the Coral Gables War Memorial Youth Center. Working with a recreational needs program prepared by the Metropolitan Dade County Parks and Recreation Department, WRT combined its architectural and landscape architectural expertise to provide an integrated solution for the Youth Center's future needs. New expanded outdoor facilities included three baseball fields, two soccer /football fields, combined basketball /rollerhocky court and tot -lot The architectural solution included a new gym, auditorium, locker rooms, and multipurpose craft and meeting rooms. The Master Plan also recognized the "Civic" aspects of the expanded facility and relocated the main entrance on University Drive During the two part design and construction phases of the project, WRT served as landscape architects preparing detailed design documents and providing construction administration services for over $600,000. in site improvements including athletic facilities, landscaping and irrigation. Fairchild Tropical Garden, Miami, FL Partner In Charge: WRT prepared a Master Plan for Fairchild Tropical Garden, the Miami region's 83-acre public botanical garden and a world - renowned collection of palms, cycads, and other tropical plant families. The Master Plan, completed in 1995, was the Garden's first comprehensive evaluation of its physical plan and facility growth needs in over 30 years. The Master Plan identified key strategies for meeting the growing demands of the Garden's programs and operations through cooperative projects with adjacent Dade County park facilities, as well as strategic upgrades and expansions of existing Garden facilities. The Master Plan also carefully preserved and restored significant features and concepts of the original 1938 Garden plans, prepared by the pioneering Florida landscape architect and Olmsted associate William Lyman Phillips. In conjunction with the Master Plan, WRT also designed specific "early action" improvements to help re- invigorate the Garden in the aftermath of Hurricane Andrew. These included a renovation of the Garden's front parking area and entrance, a restoration of the "Phillips Gate" and original entrance Allee, and a restoration plan for the Flowering Tree Section. Volunteer Park & Equestrian Center, Plantation, FL Principal in Charge: WRT has been retained by the City of Plantation to prepare design and construction documents for the $6 million development and expansion of Volunteer Park This unique project will combine a multi- use, open -space community park — adjacent to an existing Community Center — with extensive restored wetlands, traits and boardwalks and a nature -themed playground. In addition, the City's popular but aging Horse Page 2 of 3 IW.r.A R..,, e & T ... r .r 49 ' Arena, also adjacent to the park, will be completely renovated and expanded as part of the project, providing a venue for Class "A" Horse Shows as well as a wide variety of special equestrian uses. Boynton Intracoastal Waterway Park, Boynton Beach, Florida. Project Director / Designer. WRT prepared a Master Plan for the last undeveloped parcel of land on the Intracoastal Waterway in Boynton Beach. The primary objectives of the plan were scenic enhancement, environmental restoration of the site, and educational interpretation. Master Plan facilities ' include a two -story picnic facility, an educational and performance pavilion, a Veterans Memorial garden and shelter, picnic shelters and restrooms and associated parking. 1 L L k Gerald C. Marston, FASLA Page 3 of 3 ' EDWARD MAZUR, JR., P.E. PRESIDENT /CEO SUMMARY OF EXPERIENCE ' Mr. Mazur offers thirty years of civil engineering experience for a variety of projects for both private and public clients. He is one of the founding partners of Florida Design Consultants, Inc. (FDC) and is ' responsible for the day to day operations of the firm, business development, project quality assurance and administration for specifically assigned projects. Mr. Mazur was majority owner and president of King Engineering Associates, Inc., from 1984 through 1993. Mr. Mazur's area of expertise is land development ' for residential, commercial and industrial projects. These projects have involved master planning and infrastructure design including water, sanitary sewer and roadway systems, as well as obtaining all required permits. Throughout his career, Mr. Mazur has been involved in more than 200 land development projects I on the west coast of Florida ranging from a one acre commercial site to a 15,000 acre residential development. RELEVANT EXPERIENCE Significant projects Mr. Mazur has been involved with include: ' IMR Global Center — Redevelopment of a 14 acre site in downtown Clearwater to include approximately p pp Y +260,000 SF of offices and a 692 space parking structure. The work included all site development planning, design, permitting and construction related services. ' Sunshine Mall Redevelopment — Total demolition and reconstruction of a 35 acre site in Clearwater that previously contained a 900,000 SF shopping center /mall, and now contains approximately 600 apartment units and outparcels for commercial development. County sy ide - An 1800 acre development by the US Home Corp. in Clearwater, Florida. Responsibilities included the master planning and design of the water distribution and sanitary sewer collection systems. Mr. I Mazur also designed the water distribution and sanitary sewer collection systems for the north section of Countryside (approximately 1,000 acres) and assisted in the storm drainage master plans for that segment. 1 Sugarmill Woods - Mr. Mazur was in charge of the Master Planning and design of the roadways, water, sewer, and drainage systems for the 12,000 units of this 15,000 acre mixed use project located in both Citrus and Hernando Counties, Florida. Morton Plant Hospital - Mr. Mazur was the principal -in- charge during the development of master roadway, parking, drainage and landscaping plans for the downtown Clearwater campus of Morton Plant Hospital. Mr. Mazur also assisted the Hospital with the acquisition of 100 +/- acres in Pasco County, Florida, to be used by the hospital to develop a new campus. Work included preparation of master plans for drainage, water supply, and sanitary sewer facilities. 1 ' Edward Mazur, Jr., P.E. Page 2 ' Ridgemoor - A 1000 acre residential project in Pinellas County that involved design and master planning for the water distribution and sanitary sewer collection systems. Summerfield Crossings - Design and master planning for a 2,000 acre mixed -use project in Hillsborough County, Florida. ' Tampa Bay Areawide Water Quality Management Plan - Developed a plan for the Tampa Bay Regional Planning Council to control both point and non -point pollution problems in the Tampa Bay area. The ' project covered Pinellas, Pasco, Hillsborough and Manatee Counties (approximately 500 square miles). Master Drainage Plan for Pinellas County - Developed a master drainage plan for Pinellas County to ' determine the required drainage improvements necessary to eliminate the County's flood problems. Responsibilities included locating and determining capacities of existing outfall systems, determining culvert or channels to be improved, locating and sizing possible water retention sites, and compiling quantity ' information. Most of the above work was done through the use of a computer program developed for this project by Mr. Mazur. EDUCATION ' BSCE, University of Texas at Austin, with Honors, 1969 U.S. Army Engineers School - Army Construction & Quality Control Techniques, 1969 PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION Professional Engineer, Florida, #21318, 1975 ' Professional Engineer, Texas, #40838, 1977 MEMBERSHIP IN PROFESSIONAL /CIVIC ORGANIZATIONS ' National Society of Professional Engineers ' Florida Engineering Society Leadership Pinellas, 1982 Leadership Tampa Bay, 1993 ' City of Clearwater Planning and Zoning Board (Chairman for 3 years) City of Clearwater Marine Advisory Board ' ROY E. CHAPMAN, P.E. VICE PRESIDENT/TRANSPORTATION SERVICES FLORIDA DESIGN CONSULTANTS, INC. ' SUMMARY OF EXPERIENCE ' Mr. Chapman offers over thirty years of experience completing traffic and transportation studies and designs. He spent fifteen years working for a county government preparing plans for improvements to roads, parks, and two large airports. He has worked in private practice in Florida since 1984 preparing ' traffic studies, route location studies, Project Development and Environment (PD &E) studies, and designs for public and private sector clients. His traffic experience includes preparing traffic impact studies, studies for Certificate Levels of Service, Developments of Regional Impact (DRI's), and ' providing review services to government agencies on similar studies. His involvement in route location and PD &E studies includes project management, completion of engineering aspects of the project, report preparation, and handling public involvement issues. RELEVANT EXPERIENCE ' Significant projects Mr. Chapman has been involved with include: Recent projects on which Mr. Chapman has served as Project Manager or Project Engineer include: ' • Development of Regional Impact Transportation Review Services, Tamp a Bay Regional Planning ' Council, Pinellas Park, Florida - Project Manager.. Provide transportation services for TBRPC to review applicant's analysis of DRI impacts. Review services for TBRPC have been provided on a continuous basis since 1984. ' • Traffic Impact Study Review Services, Pasco County, Florida - Project Manager. Provide as requested traffic study review assistance to Pasco County Government. Projects may include review ' of traffic studies prepared to meet the County's Traffic Impact Study (TIS) guidelines, U.S. 19 traffic study requirements, or other related tasks. ' • Plantation Oaks Traffic Study, Pasco County - Transportation Engineer. Prepared a traffic study to meet the County's Traffic Impact Study guidelines to allow this residential and office development to receive approval. Analysis included intersection and link operation document operating conditions and needed improvements, including turn lane storage lengths. • Epperson Ranch DRI, Pasco County, Florida — Traffic Engineer. Prepared a DRI/ADA traffic study ' of potential impacts from this mixed used development to be located on the west side of Curley Road north of S.R. 54. Project included FSUTMS computer modeling of project trip distribution, and analysis using the. Highway Capacity Software and Synchro techniques. Project included ' identifying improvements needed and a calculation of proportionate share cost for the projects impacts. ' • Ashley Glen Development of Regional Impact, JES Properties, Inc., Pasco County, Florida- - Transportation Engineer. Prepared a DRI/ADA analysis for this office, commercial, and residential development located in the northeast quadrant of S.R. 54 and the Suncoast Parkway. Study included ' FSUTMS modeling and analysis using Highway Capacity Manual and Synchro techniques. • River Club Park of Commerce, Manatee County, Florida -- Project Manager. A Development of ' Regional Impact transportation analysis was prepared for this mixed -use site. FSUTMS modeling and analysis using Highway Capacity Manual techniques were used. ' • Tampa Telecom Park (GTE Collier 326 DRI), GTE /Collier Joint Venture, Temple Terrace, Florida -- Project Manager. A NOPC traffic analysis was prepared to allow the project to. continue ' development to the year 2010. Project included FSUTMS modeling and analysis of links and intersections using 1985 Highway Capacity Manual Techniques. • Starkey Ranch DRI, Starkey Development Company, Pasco County, Florida — Transportation Engineer. Prepared a development of regional impact traffic study for this multi -use project located on the north side of S.R. 54 between Gunn Highway and Starkey Boulevard. Project included ' computer modeling for project traffic distribution and determination of growth in background traffic and detailed analysis of intersections and links to determine operating conditions with the project. • Pauls Drive (Brandon Main Street) Hillsborough County Government, Hillsborough County, Florida— Project Manager. Completed a PD &E study to identify the preferred method to improve the segment of Pauls Drive from SR 60 to Brandon Parkway in Hillsborough County. Project included alignment analysis, detailed cost estimates, public involvement including meetings with concerned property owners, and recommendation of a preferred alternative. ' • River Landings Centre, River Landings Centre Joint Venture, Manatee County, Florida -- Project Manager. Provided traffic analysis to demonstrate that adequate capacity was available on SR 70 to ' allow the project to be constructed and meet Manatee County's transportation concurrency requirements. Provided an additional study to review traffic impacts associated with providing directional left turn bays in the median of a proposed four -lane divided rural typical section to be constructed on SR 70 in front of the site. – EDUCATION ' Wayne State University, BSCE Wayne State University, MSCE ' Professional Credentials ' Master of Science in Civil Engineering, Wayne State University, 1973 Bachelor of Science in Civil Engineering, Wayne State University, 1968 Registered Professional Engineer: Florida (No. 34438) ' Member, Institute of Transportation Engineers Member, Florida Engineering Society Member, National Society of Professional Engineers n L' r VICKY M. GAGLIANO Parking Specialist EDUCATION University of Florida, Bachelor of Business Administration, 1997 University of South Florida, Master of Business Administration, 2000 PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS Florida Parking Association American Planning Association CPP, Certified Parking Professional 0,.-Ms. Gagliano currently serves the firm as a parking specialist, providing expertise to all TimHaahs offices. Her responsibilities include researching, analyzing, and recommending solutions to parking problems through the performance of parking supply /demand, alternatives and site analysis, market and financial feasibility, shared parking, revenue control, and parking management studies. These studies utilize her skills of investigation, analytical evaluation and presentation of findings. Ms. Gagliano's extensive education and experience in financial analysis augments her expertise in performing financial feasibility and supply /demand studies. Ms. Gagliano has national study experience, including notable projects in Arizona, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Maryland, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Virginia, Washington, DC, Colorado, North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, Puerto Rico, and the Bahamas. RELEVANT PROJECT EXPERIENCE City of Coral Gables Coral Gables, FL The City of Coral Gables engaged TimHaahs to evaluate the potential impact on parking, should the City decide to move forward with one of three streetscape improvements. Along with evaluating the current and future parking adequacy, TimHaahs conducted a review of the existing trolley system, security, wayfinding and signage, conditions of the parking facilities, operational and management practices, and the financial performance of the parking system. Rosslyn Business Improvement District Rosslyn, VA TimHaahs was retained by the Rosslyn Business Improvement District to perform a needs analysis to determine the present and future parking supply and demand in the area. TimHaahs' recommendations for this project included how to better utilize current parking supply, hours of enforcement, length of time parking is permitted, and appropriate pricing for each location. Savannah River Landing Mixed -Use Development Savannah, GA TimHaahs prepared a shared parking study, as well as parking consulting services for a major mixed -use project planned for downtown Savannah. The project, known as Savannah River Landing, will be the first mixed -use project of its kind in the Savannah area. Located east of downtown along the Savannah River, the development will consist of hotels, high -end retail, high -rise condominiums and commercial office space. In addition, a large single - family residential component will be built adjacent to the commercial area. Parking is extremely critical infrastructure serving the development. Overton Park Mixed -Use Development Atlanta, GA TimHaahs prepared shared parking study and provided parking consulting services for a new mixed -use project planned for the Cumberland area in northwest Atlanta. The mixed -use project will consist of a high -end hotel, luxury condominiums and retail. Parking will be integral to the structures and designed to accommodate the special needs of the development. In particular, the layout of the parking will emphasize segregating condominium tenants from retail and hotel users. In addition, the parking environment will be designed to promote openness and safety, while creating a positive first impression as one visits the development. r UMamh The Crown Office Building Nashville, TN TimHaahs provided parking consulting for a new 1000 space garage that will serve a high rise office building in downtown Nashville. The parking will be below grade and will serve a variety of patrons, providing essential infrastructure for the new development. Bradley Memorial Hospital Supply /Demand Study Brentwood, TN TimHaahs was retained in 2006 to develop a parking demand study for Bradley Memorial Hospital, now known as SkyRidge Medical Center. SkyRidge is embarking on an expansion of their campus and wanted to know how much parking each major user group needed as the expansion moves forward. Market Analysis - Vehicle Parking Use & Demand Study Athens, GA TimHaahs reviewed a previous parking study, providing updated analysis regarding current market conditions. The updated study will be utilized to validate the parking demand for a planned 575 space parking deck. Kennesaw State University Parking Master Plan Kennesaw, GA TimHaahs prepared a campus -wide parking master plan, including sizing a new multi -level parking structure, and assessing new parking operational and management initiatives and pedestrian and vehicular traffic flow. The project is also helping to set the stage for KSU to move into a new era for developing and managing a parking system. Morven Museum & Gardens Princeton, NJ This non - profit organization is dedicated to the preservation of the New Jersey historic landmark known as Morven. TimHaahs reviewed a proposed plan for future parking and made recommendations on ways to improve efficiency. City of Fort Lauderdale Parking Study Fort Lauderdale, FL TimHaahs conducted a comprehensive review of the parking codes and ordinances in Fort Lauderdale, providing several suggestions for modifications Mount Cuba Center Greenville, DE TimHaahs worked with the non - profit organization to help determine future parking needs as a result of increased activity at the center. Prospect Park Parking Study and Consulting Atlanta, GA A major mixed -use development in Alpharetta, Georgia, TimHaahs was retained to development a shared parking study to determine the peak hour parking needs of the entire project to ensure that the "right" amount of parking is provided. TimHaahs will also serve as parking designer as the project advances. C ' Ms. Tarapani is a professional planner with over .27 years of experience in the planning field, serving both public and private clients in Florida. Ms. Tarapani's experience in the public arena includes senior management positions for the Cities of Clearwater and ' Tampa; in addition to her current position in the private sector, she has also served as a partner in a Tampa planning firm and as a planner with a Tampa land use law firm. Ms. Tarapani also served as the Executive Director of the Florida Trust for Historic ' Preservation, a 2,000 member statewide non - profit preservation advocacy association. As the corporate executive officer for the Florida Trust, she was responsible for the organization's fundraising, major heritage tourism events, educational programs as well 7 as representing the organization before the Florida Legislature advocating historic preservation policies. Ms. Tarapani has outstanding presentation and negotiation skills and is an experienced facilitator for a variety of organization types and functions. As a lifelong Floridian whose entire career has been in Florida, Ms. Tarapani is especially knowledgeable about Florida's Growth Management Law, related state laws and Florida's history in the planning and development regulation field. Additionally, Ms. Tarapani is highly qualified in and has concentrated her career in the following planning areas: Zoning and Development Re lgu ation- creation, administration and implementation, staff training and integration with the community's Comprehensive Plan. Redevelopment Planning creation of redevelopment plans, design guidelines, funding options and implementation methods. Project Approvals for Development Clients- including Developments of Regional Impact, Comprehensive Plan Amendments, Rezoning Applications, Site Plan Development, Development Agreements. Historic Preservation- historic preservation planning, development of local ordinances and design guidelines. Neighborhood Planning Commercial Corridor Studies and other special area studies. CYNTHIA HARDIN TARAPANI VICE PRESIDENT OF PLANNING ' FLORIDA DESIGN CONSULTANTS 3030 Starkey Boulevard New Port Richey, Florida 34655 ' (727) 849 -7588 ctarapani @fldesign.com ' SUMMARY OF EXPERIENCE ' Ms. Tarapani is a professional planner with over .27 years of experience in the planning field, serving both public and private clients in Florida. Ms. Tarapani's experience in the public arena includes senior management positions for the Cities of Clearwater and ' Tampa; in addition to her current position in the private sector, she has also served as a partner in a Tampa planning firm and as a planner with a Tampa land use law firm. Ms. Tarapani also served as the Executive Director of the Florida Trust for Historic ' Preservation, a 2,000 member statewide non - profit preservation advocacy association. As the corporate executive officer for the Florida Trust, she was responsible for the organization's fundraising, major heritage tourism events, educational programs as well 7 as representing the organization before the Florida Legislature advocating historic preservation policies. Ms. Tarapani has outstanding presentation and negotiation skills and is an experienced facilitator for a variety of organization types and functions. As a lifelong Floridian whose entire career has been in Florida, Ms. Tarapani is especially knowledgeable about Florida's Growth Management Law, related state laws and Florida's history in the planning and development regulation field. Additionally, Ms. Tarapani is highly qualified in and has concentrated her career in the following planning areas: Zoning and Development Re lgu ation- creation, administration and implementation, staff training and integration with the community's Comprehensive Plan. Redevelopment Planning creation of redevelopment plans, design guidelines, funding options and implementation methods. Project Approvals for Development Clients- including Developments of Regional Impact, Comprehensive Plan Amendments, Rezoning Applications, Site Plan Development, Development Agreements. Historic Preservation- historic preservation planning, development of local ordinances and design guidelines. Neighborhood Planning Commercial Corridor Studies and other special area studies. �, Eminent Domain -site analysis, client representation and expert witness testimony in ' court. Ms. Tarapani is certified as an expert witness in the fields of Urban and Regional Planning and Historic Preservation by the Cities of Clearwater and Tampa and also certified by the Circuit Courts of Hernando, Hillsborough, Pasco and Pinellas in the field ' of Urban and Regional Planning. Project Management including staff supervision and budget management. SELECTED PROJECTS Comprehensive Planning Project Manager, City of Clearwater Evaluation and Appraisal Report. Creation of work program and timeframe, design of public involvement process and consultant selection for EAR due in October, 2007. Project Manager, Evaluation and Appraisal Report Plan Amendments to City of Clearwater Comprehensive Plan, adopted by City of Clearwater in May, 2000. ' Co- Author with Gina Clayton, City of Clearwater Planner III, Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan, adopted by City of Clearwater, February 2003. Creation of new ' downtown Community Redevelopment Act- compliant Plan for 540 acre downtown, including 6 subdistricts, land use goals, objectives and policies, financing mechanisms and implementation strategies including density pool. f As Assistant Planning Director and Planning Director for the City of Clearwater, administer the City's Comprehensive Plan amendment process for both small and large ' scale plan amendments. ' Numerous Comprehensive Plan amendments (small and large scale) for private clients in Pinellas, Pasco, Hillsborough and Hernando Counties and Cities of Clearwater, Tampa and Vero Beach. ' Corridor and Special Area Studies Author, Commercial Land Use Pattern Study of Hernando County. Analysis of all commercial sites in Hernando County including location, size, function, market area, development status. Prepared for Florida's Turnpike Authority, 1998. ' Author, Veteran's Expressway Interchange Study, Hillsborough County. Analysis of development patterns in vicinity of Expressway interchanges after the construction of toll ' road. Prepared for Florida's Turnpike Authority, 1998. ' Author, Major Development Proposals in Pasco, Hillsborough and Hernando Counties. Analysis and mapping of all projects with 100 or more dwelling units including type of ' development, phases, status of development approvals, summary of construction to date. Prepared for Florida's Turnpike Authority, 1998. ' Co- Author, multiple Due Diligence Reports for Lennar Communities for residential and mixed use projects in Pasco and Hillsborough Counties. ' Project Manager, Study of Availability of Adult Use Sites in the City of Tampa, prepared for the City of Tampa to support the City's amortization regulations challenged in circuit court. Served as City's principal witness on land use and zoning issues in court. Historic Preservation and Neighborhood Planning ' Co- Author with Gina Clayton, City of Clearwater Planner III and Mark Parry, City of Clearwater Planner II, Clearwater Downtown Design Guidelines, adopted by City of Clearwater, 2004. Creation of comprehensive design guidelines for 6 unique subdistricts ' addressing new construction, renovation, historic buildings, sites and landscape improvements. ' Project Manager for Island Estates Neighborhood Conservation Overlay District, adopted by the City of Clearwater in September, 2002. Intensive neighborhood planning process over 1 and %2 years to develop neighborhood plan and unique development ' regulations for this waterfront community. Project Manager for Tampa's first Historic Preservation Ordinance, with consultant ' assistance from the National Trust for Historic Preservation. Adopted by City of Tampa in 1987. ' Project Manager for Hyde Park Historic District Designation and Design Guidelines, with consultant assistance from the National Trust for Historic Preservation and the ' Tampa/ Hillsborough County Preservation Board. Adopted by the City of Tampa in 1988. Project Manager of Ybor City Zoning Code and Design Guidelines, with consultant assistance from Robert M. Leary & Associates. Adopted by City of Tampa in 1986. Creation of new zoning district for Ybor City Historic District including unique sub- districts and Design Guidelines for both commercial and residential structures. Project received an Award of Excellence in 1985 from the Suncoast Chapter of the American Planning Association. 0 IZoning and Development Regulation ' Administrator of Clearwater Community Development Code, adopted by City of Clearwater, March, 1999 to 2005. Administration included chief liaison/staff support to the City's Community Development Board; administer review of over 600 site plans for 1 City staff and Community Development Board review; development and review of all amendments to Development Code; initial and ongoing training of Community Development Board members; regular review of and improvements to all internal review ' processes for fairness and consistency. Administrator of City of Tampa Zoning Code from 1985 -1989, to include management of ' zoning division, review of all site plans, rezoning applications and variances and principal author of all new development regulations. Project Manager of City of Tampa's Zoning Conformance Program, a two year city -wide program to rezone over 110,000 parcels to achieve conformance between new zoning code and adopted Comprehensive Plan. Program included computer - generated individual ' notice to each property owner, ten public hearings in four sectors of City, substantial negotiation with property owners and serve as City's chief planner providing advice and professional recommendations to Tampa City Council during public hearing process. ' Author, Subdivision Code for the City of Pinellas Park, first update in over 10 years. Adopted by the City of Pinellas Park in 1984. ' Policy and Program Evaluation ' As Assistant Planning Director and Planning Director for the City of Clearwater, create the organizational structure for the City's Planning Department to respond to new design - oriented performance based zoning code. Create all internal procedures, documents, training of both planning staff and new Community Development Board members in new zoning code procedures and policies. ' As Executive Director for the Florida Trust of Historic Preservation, develop legislative program for historic preservation interests, coordinate lobbying efforts of 2,000 member ' non - profit advocacy association and serve as lobbyist before the Florida Legislature. EMPLOYMENT HISTORY ' Vice President of Planning, Florida Design Consultants July, 2005 to present. ' Planning Director, City of Clearwater, Florida July, 2001 to April, 2005 Assistant Planning Director, City of Clearwater, Florida February, 1999 to July, 2001 1 Principal, Engelhardt Hammer & Associates, Tampa, Florida January, 1996 to February, 1999 ' Executive Director, Florida Trust for Historic Preservation, Inc., Tallahassee, Florida 1992 -1995 Planner, Taub & Williams, P.A., Tampa, Florida ' 1989 -1992 Assistant Manager, Land Development Coordination Division, ' City of Tampa. Housing and Development Coordination Department 1984 -1989 I C Associate Planner, Planning and Zoning Division, City of Pinellas Park, Florida 1982 -1984 Assistant Planner, Current Planning Section, Manatee County Planning and Development Department 1981 -1982 Planning Technician, Planning Department, City of St. Petersburg, Florida 1981 EDUCATION Master of Science in Urban and Regional Planning, 1992 Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida Thesis: The Relationship between Historic District Designation and Gentrification: A Case Study of Tampa, Florida Sole Recipient of the Department's McClure Award for Academic Achievement, 1992. Bachelor of Arts in Political Science, 1981 Clemson University, Clemson, South Carolina Member, Clemson Chapter Blue Key IACTIVITIES AND AFFILIATIONS Central Florida Regional Citizens Advisory Board to the Division of Historical ' Resources, Department of State, Member appointed by Florida Secretary of State Kurt Browning in September, 2007. ' Tarpon Springs Heritage Preservation Board, Member appointed by Tarpon Springs City Council in May, 2007. Served as Alternate Member from September, 2006 to May, 2007. Tarpon Springs Area Historical Society, Member of the Board of Directors, ' September, 2005 to present. Pinellas County Historic Preservation Advisory Board, February, 2008 to present. ' Member of predecessor Historic Preservation Task Force, August, 2005 to February, 2008. Appointed by the Pinellas County Board of County Commissioners. ' Florida Trust for Historic Preservation, Inc. Statewide Co- Chairman for 2002 State Conference, St. Petersburg. ' Program Chairman for 1998 State Conference, Tampa. Tampa Preservation, Inc., 1996 -2000 ' Board Member. Revolving Fund Committee Member. Newsletter Editor. Leadership Hillsborough, 1997 ' Member and Fundraising Chairman for the Class of 1997. ' Florida's National Register Review Board Member, 1994 -1997. Vice Chairman, 1996 -1 997. ' Florida Chapter of the American Planning Association Awards Program Chairman, 1991 and 1992. Awards Program Juror, 1990. Program Chairman, 1988 Annual State Conference, St. Petersburg. Suncoast Section of the American Planning Association Chairman, 1992. Vice Chairman, 1991. Secretary, 1990. Awards Program Chairman, 1989 -1990. — WI L�j OA VI A R. J. Heisenbottle Architects, PA y• R. J. Heisenbottle Architects, PA (F.S.U.) - R. J. Heisenbottle Architects, PA • • •• i, 1pf. WIWO ' --. W - N `d R. J. Heisenbottle Architects, PA E R. J. Heisenbottle Architects, PA 00 R. J. Heisenbottle Architects, PA R. J. Heisenbottle Architects, PA - if, qk 14 R N .r . .. • r' i � �I � � I ,. A _ ,�F ,'' ��,� � i1\ � �l �! i^' -may -,, A li Ila m1lil R)HA MASON Real Estate Investors. Inc. irk.. - V-.- Iz, MASON Real Estate Investors. Inc. �(I.B�/1Q ��fLB R. J. Heisenbottle Architects, PA r j. 6,R,2e1l1 C R. J. Heisenbottle Architects, PA Alt R. J. Heisenbottle Architects, PA ^0000 0 000 P,jmd Sao t 0 r 1 R. J. Heisenbottle Architects, PA Legend P - Preservation OS /R - Open Space /Recreation T- Tourist B- Business HDR - High Density Residential MDR - Medium Density Residential 1- Instutional C - Commercial RYaMkWnom the CHrofOean Ma Gulf of Mexico r I II P Intracoastal Waterway Sand Key Zoning Districts 0 0 Legend M P - Preservation FIR/OS- Recreation /Open Space ® RFH Resort Facilities High ®RH - Residential High RM - Residential Medium CG- Commercial General TU - Transportation /Utility D=(I raiaW1— the @yd Ckm eranl PJwIbsC nry. Gulf Of Mexico I/Tu P fiRH Intracoastal Waterway CG �RM Sand Key Future Land Use Map Preservat io n No Sam tums Gulf of Mexico it j! R. J. Heisenbottle Architects, PA i 1 OSR Open Space/Recreation Commercial Prgpomd StruCtuw Notej {8o 4 Dieck, Parking PublrcAccess Easements Dan's Island --_; Condami n iu m :41r Belleview Cabana Club Zoning Districts i •• R. J. Heisenbottle Architects, PA R. J. Heisenbottle Architects, PA Cdr 6000"? ,�w A�'Ikl R. J. Heisenbottle Architects, PA BELLEVIEW BILTMORE CABANA CLUB i 1590 Gulf Boulevard Clearwater, Florida JULY 14,2008 roc ,s 6— - \ — Rj HEISENBOTTLE 2199 PONCE DE LEON BLVD.. SUITE 400 CORAL CABLES. FL 33134 TELEPHONE: 305/446 -7799 FAX: 305/446 -9275 FLORIDA REGISTRATION NUMBER: AR 0010865 R. J. Heisenbottie Architects, PA TESrAIIUNT NET AREA - 4281 OF TOTAL Nl2®1 OF tl8T ROOMS - 38 80016 (12 SUITE$ 26 REGULAR) PARM IEOI.RBD FOR HOTEL - 38 PAWING SPACES TOTAL PAiKNO PFKMFD INCLUDING a ASXE881LE SPACES - 50 SPACES BEACH CLUB AREA CALCULATIONS HOTEL GROSS AREA = 39,931 S.F. RESTAURANT CROSS AREA = 5,862 S.F. TOTAL GROSS AREA = 45,793 S.F. POOL & DECK AREA = 5,591 S.F. A �O �P '4T 05 �� . N PROPOSED BEACH FRONT HOTEL. W.&SVw - f-0' A -6.02 // / / 00, "m BELLEVIEW BILTMORE CABANA CLUB 1590 Guff Boulevard Clearwater, F Nkla SCHEMATIC DESICK \ IULY 14, 2008 / >` _ V �J N~ n°' r ry FWT FLOOR PLAN Rj HEISENBOTTLE 2199 PONCE DE LEON BLVD., SUITE 400 CORAL GABLES, FL 33134 TELEPHONE: 305 /446 -7799 FAX: 305/446 -9275 FLORIDA REGISTRATION NUMBER: AR 0010665 U, rj-- R. J. Heisenbottle Architects, PA \ `d op -1b 41 J/ i O % � 7 N PROPOSED BEACH FRONT HOTEL 90A Z Vw - f-V A -6.03 9 BELLEVIEVV BILTMORE CABANA CLUB ;W C"i Baaixd Gear%aw nionda SCHEMATIC DESIGN #-%E 1 ' . 211,36 R. J. Heisenbottle Architects, PA s 3RD AND 4TH FLOOR PLANS ATTC FLOOR PLM 5TH FLOOR PLAN HOTEL 56 Spaces PARKING /RATIO Cabana Club 38 Marriott 220 Sheraton 390 Sand Pearl 260 R. J. Heisenbottle Architects, PA Facility Comparison ROOMS SPA RESTAURANT BANQUET No 1 None 56 Spaces (1.47) Yes 2 79500 SF 330 Spaces (1.50) No 4 24,000 SF 399 Spaces (1.02) Yes 3 25,000 SF 221 Spaces (0.85) Building Height from FEMA Flood Criteria — 66' -7" or 6 Stories Tall Over Parking Comparisons: Dans Island —11 Floors Over Parking (2 Buildings) Cabana Club Condominium — 8 Floors Over Parking (2 Buildings) EUMNO CONDO/POW EXISTING CONDOMINIUM k..- 100' Building Separation R. J. Heisenbottie Architects, PA EAST ELEVATION 31' Building Separation IMMIUM2 IW FA' xm Ali ew i 1 ■ ill III\�1 - .._.m ..__' Wall limn s ■Ilan Illma■ allaln II1111111111■ Milan dIsm ■1116■ III■■■ ■Ililn II■ ■n Milan tl■■ ■II »n llumn il IMMn Milan Ilas 11 RRII'I III 1= Q311f11 ■1'I 011111 I■ ■II Ian nn r-In iil fill MASON Real Estate hwestors. Inc. NEW HOTEL N.G.v.D, EL . C' -C' N R. J. Heisenbottle Architects, PA R. J. Heisenbottle Architects, PA (�,a%rszir ��i�.Udrofc�ae 07a� R. J. Heisenbottle Architects, PA Florida Design Consultants Survey of Building Heights W 0 0 E c 25 20 15 10 5 M Sand Key Building Height Comparison i:111111111C:. bl-kl� 616i-61-b- 6� b� 6- 16-- 6� 66- 6- .�e cy v� 4 0 Q Source: FDC Building Heights Study 2008 number of buildings °� °� o o` o °1 �o , �o � cb @J number of buildings 25 W a� 0 15 V) 45 0 L E 10 5 C Immediate Vicinity Sand Key Building Height Comparison A B C D E F 4 Source: FDC Budding Heights Study 2008 R. J. Heisenbottle Architects, PA R. J. Heisenbottle Architects, PA Purpose of the Appraisal Study 1. Study if a change in use from restaurant with rooftop lounge to a Boutique Hotel affects property values in the general market area. 2. Study if a change in use from restaurant with rooftop lounge to a Boutique Hotel affects property values in immediately surrounding properties. Nick Clarizio Real Estate Appraiser R. J. Heisenbottle Architects, PA Clearwater Pointe 1. Study condominium sales in Clearwater Pointe 2. Study sales in close proximity to Shell's Restaurant 3. Study sales in Clearwater Pointe away from Shell's Restaurant 4. Conclusion — restaurant does not cause any diminution in value Nick Clarizio Real Estate Appraiser R. J. Heisenbottle Architects, PA ••r• •• • •• Grande on Sand Key 1. Control Property — Grande on Sand Key 2. Pairings made to Meridian on Sand Key 3. Five pairings were made 4. Conclusion —Hotel and restaurant use indicated no diminution in value Nick Clarizio Real Estate Appraiser R. J. Heisenbottle Architects, PA View Amenity Adjustment 1. Monthly appreciation study 2. Harbour South pairings 3. Isle of Sand Key pairings Nick Clarizio Real Estate Appraiser R. J. Heisenbottle Architects, PA �r,n • 0 •• Study Conclusion 1. No negative impact on property values in the general market area due to change in use. 2. 15 units will be affected by view in 2 condominium projects. Estimated loss of value of those 15 units located on the east side of Gulf Blvd is in the range of 5% — 10 Nick Clarizio Real Estate Appraiser R. J. Heisenbottle Architects, PA caewzx��- e m.� e. LEgm T - •... - M tam y - Florida Design Consultants Ed Mazur, PE Site Plan R. J. Heisenbottle Architects, PA i � � I D /r D N® / vo e L �/ • •s t /! D D DRAINAGE IR MA N t. n¢.rypi - M rxlSi OME -NNJ wW (697 Gi rUl91i. RtNJZ �i � t� � I I a9W.R0E m amupw RoNSU wrm fap. x® is rrs.rxnn. papal[. tRGi 1NF n6r r�E -WNrm6 rtd (ori7 R Mx19is. .m nor wuv • *rorrnai - Nwe ic9us¢n In.� mp gCTiON B ar`TMW r_ A>a d d'�Bp - A B X !•'Q� •!A / •�C• e � � � `w�mw wa / e / %• FFE -7.70 I LaL r_ 9 i � as ♦ i � n . t. kl iaµwN raw suun ro rocv vcsnrrnxc � ••....• °-a ,ma.em..m.ae �. ww�.•. +a...,.•..« rtu •s. ♦ orwe ,rwrrtNC �xasso o ""� z wtm.cmr ro Ntsrao[ nE sma¢s a • e SEAWALL C �I� ciao. �caion:9 vRORSSaN•u otvtaN ro ocsat. . twr w tr.r n... iNSOfCr, ND ¢pm 1EiNNNG w/iLL GGN9rryGiq. „s •s vurr a nc taraxno rau cosh - n�..c .r two. - o.•. Florida Design Consultants Ed Mazur, PE Paving Grading &Drainage R. J. Heisenbottle Architects, PA / 4 I / • � � � � srva � wnn .- � 11 � • rxmml— _ �� yr _ r rxx � � • o•..... u. • w. . lore+xl r> R. J. Heisenbottle Architects, PA Florida Design Consultants Ed Mazur, PE Utility Plan i .. xr m °• m e • v r 0 N a 0 00 Cabana Club Trip Generation Land Use Quality Restaurant Weekday Trips /Day (Existing 7,653 Sq. Ft.) Hotel (38 Occupied Rooms) R. J. Heisenbottle Architects, PA 71160PI60 339 Florida Design Consultants Roy Chapman, PE Traffic Analysis P.M. Peak Hour of Generator .1 J gro Cabana Club Trip Generation Land Use Quality Restaurant Saturday Trips /Day (Existing 7,653 Sq. Ft.) Hotel (38 Occupied Rooms) R. I Heisenbottle Architects, PA 722 399 Florida Design Consultants Roy Chapman, PE Traffic Analysis P.M. Peak Hour of Generator M6 33 City of Clearwater Beach Area Traffic Study February 2008 City Study Reviewed Levels of Service for the year 2027 •Study Assumed 50 Rooms of Hotel at the Cabana Club Site • Study Concludes Acceptable Levels of Service on Sand Key • No Roadway Improvements Necessary for Sand Key R. J. Heisenbottle Architects, PA Florida Design Consultants Roy Chapman, PE Traffic Analysis B elleview B iltmore Cabana Club Parking Demand Timothy Haahs & Associates Vicky Gagliano, MBA Parking Consultants R. J. Heisenbottle Architects, PA Program Information • 38 Hotel Rooms • 4,981 SF Restaurant • 56 Parking Spaces is Peak Hour Identified as 9pm on a Saturday Evening Timothy Haahs & Associates Vicky Gagliano, MBA Parking Consultants R. J. Heisenbottle Architects, PA Hotel Parking Demand Hotel Guests /Employees: 1.0 space /key Beachfront hotels typically have a lower guest drive -in ratio. Most guests will utilize a taxi or shuttle to arrive to their destination as their primary purpose is to spend time on the beach. The ratio has been calibrated to account for a peak occupancy of 90% and a 70% drive ratio (30% of users will arrive via alternate mode of transportation). 38 keys x 1.0 space /key = 38 spaces x 90% Occupancy x 70% Drive Ratio = 24 space demand for hotel employees and guests Timothy Haahs & Associates Vicky Gagliano, MBA Parking Consultants R. I Heisenbottle Architects, PA Restaurant Parking Demand Restaurant Guests /Employees: 10.0 spaces /1,000 SF Hotel restaurants typically serve as an accessory use and as a convenience for the guests. In general, hotel restaurants do not generate much, if any parking demand from off -site users as a majority of their customers are hotel guests. The ratio has been calibrated to account for the 9 pm hourly adjustment of 90% and a 70% captive ratio (30% of the users are not hotel guests). 4,981 SF x 10.0 Spaces /1,000 SF = 50 Spaces x 90% Hourly Adjustment x 30% Non Captive Ratio = 14 Space Demand for Restaurant R. J. Heisenbottle Architects, PA Timothy Haahs & Associates Vicky Gagliano, MBA Parking Consultants Total Parking Demand Hotel: 24 spaces Restaurant: 14 spaces Total Parking Demand: 38 spaces On -Site Spaces Provided: 56 spaces Parking Adequacy: R. J. Heisenbottle Architects, PA 18 -space surplus Timothy Haahs & Associates Vicky Gagliano, MBA Parking Consultants Alternate Parking Options 1. A valet operation maybe used to increase the parking supply from 56 spaces to 67 spaces (a 20% increase). This allows the projected demand of 38 spaces to increase by 76% and still be sufficient to park all vehicles. 2. The Belleview Biltmore Resort and Golf Club will have surplus parking with over 1,200 spaces planned. These spaces will be available to the Cabana Club along with the existing shuttle service. Timothy Haahs & Associates Vicky Gagliano, MBA Parking Consultants R. J. Heisenbottle Architects, PA Parking Conclusions 1. More than adequate parking has been provided. 2. No parking deviation from code is required. 3. Alternative measures are in place if needed. 4. The proposed Cabana Club parking ratio far exceeds comparable resorts R. J. Heisenbottle Architects, PA i• • • Districts Cynthia Tarapani Planner Florida Design Consultants Sand Key Homestead Analysis 1. East Side of Gulf Blvd: 47% Homestead 2. West Side of Gulf Blvd: 37 % Homestead 3. Sand Key Overall: 38.5% Homestead R. J. Heisenbottle Architects, PA Cynthia Tarapani Planner Florida Design Consultants Pr *d A T r Cynthia Tarapani Planner R. J. Heisenbottle Architects, PA Florida Design Consultants n • • • Summary of Units With View Amenity Impact Building Total Units Partially Impacted Units Cabana Club 89 0 Dan's Island 169 0 Harbour South 33 9 Isle of Sand Key 124 6 TOTAL 415 15 4% OF TOTAL UNITS Conclusion: Project minimizes adverse effects including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts on adjacent properties. R. J. Heisenbottle Architects, PA Cynthia Tarapani Planner Florida Design Consultants • Cn 0 0 L E C 25 20 15 ■`C 5 Sand Key Building Height Comparison So c y i` Source: FDC Building Heights Study 2008 W� 'wry �� C� .�e So c y i` Source: FDC Building Heights Study 2008 number of buildings W� 'wry �� C� number of buildings R. J. Heisenbottle Architects, PA Wells, Wayne From: Presslnc @aol.com Sent: Sunday, July 06, 2008 3:52 PM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: Pressman: legg Mason Hope the long weekend went well. Did the 2 planners that left, Everritt and the other - were they causalities of the budget or just left? I stand corrected on one item. There is grass behind Dan's Island. I guess that I just paid attention to the sand dune green growth. Wayne, I have 2 main critical and crucial issues to follow up with you that I am just personally dismayed, upset and very surprised to not see any comments on the last staff work up. 1) Parking. As I presented in my last submittal to you, I personally think there is every reason to believe;that parking will not work and it will absolutely be devastating and a disaster to the community. It will be a travesty. In this regard, they have parking for just a 38 unit Ihotel. They then want to have - I have not gotten any measurements from them, nor seen any specific - what appears a 3,500 -4,000 square feet of 125 restaurant seats and also what appears to be a bar. That does not include what appears to be outdoor dining! Their support is that the restaurant is ancillary. I see that as 60 parking spaces required alone ... not counting outdoor dining. Wayne, allowing them to officially package that size of an ancillary use at this site in my opinion is just wrong - and again it will be a disaster. If there is one thing your department has done in the past - that is call a use what it is and demand the required parking. Does this mean that in any development project in the future all the applicants can, just•start calling other uses under one roof an ancillary use and forget the required parking? I truly think you are gutting the City parking requirements on this. In Hasim's current case, for one example, why don't I just call the office use an ancillary use to the Commercial and.be done with it? He has offered ten's of thousands of dollars to acquire to property he needs to meet your direction for parking. Second, I have been working with the rezoning of Bayside Plaza. The City would count parking space per parking space for retail square footage. Forget that - in the future we'll just pick out a few units and call'em ancillary to some other bigger use out there. Done. The staffs only response to Legg's 320% increase in seats per hotels rooms at the hotel is that they cannot separate it under ownership in the future and not have signage? What about advertising - they could plaster this place all over town and it's my guess they will - remember everything is stated as a 5 star. Of course they are going to try and fill it up. What kind of protection is that for the community to live with for the rest of time? They have as much admitted in their last submittal that their intent of the use of that restaurant falls outside of the ancillary use definition, in my opinion. If you did not see that in my last submittal - please review that asap. Certainly there is some standard of use that you can consider placing on it in reasonable form? Wayne, if you do not err on the side of caution - which you must do to protect this neighborhood, in my opinion - the results will be a full fledged 125 plus seat restaurant and bar that will provide ZERO parking for itself. 2) 1 am asking again that you require the applicant to provide elevations of the Gulfward expansion that clearly and accurately depict what is proposed by surfaces and elevated barriers (all ground elements) and barriers of gates or fencing, glass, etc.) and most importantly with clear references to the neighboring structures, so that it is easily discernable how far that gulfward expansion is. Thank you. i f Todd Pressman, President, Pressman & Assoc., Inc. 28870 U.S. Highway 19, N., #300 Clearwater, FL 3379fc. Cell, 727 - 804 -1760. 727 - 726 -8683. Fx. 727 - 669 -8114. Alt. Fx. 727 - 725 -2933 Gas prices getting you down? Search AOL Autos for fuel- efficient used cars. 2 Page 1 of 1 From: Watkins, Sherry Sent: Monday, August 25, 2008 8:29 AM To: Wells, Wayne , Subject: FW: Legg Mason trying to build a hotel on Sand Key (File #FLD2008- 02002) - - - -- Original Message - - - -- . From: BARBGOLF @aol.com [mai Ito: BARBGOLF @aol.com] Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2008 8:37 AM To: Watkins, Sherry; Hibbard, Frank; Doran, John; Petersen, Carlen; Cretekos, George; Gibson', Paul Subject: Legg Mason trying to build a hotel on Sand Key (File #FLD2008- 02002) Please give my message to CDB members. What on earth is the matter with Wayne Wells? Why would he approve an application from a company that is trying to circumvent every rule and code in the book? This company wants to take public beach, supported by public funds, for its own private use. They want to build a huge building on a lot that's less than half the required size. They even want to build it higher than code. They are trying to get away with less parking than required by not mentioning the restaurant will be larger than a normal hotel restaurant. Where will all the employees park -- they're not all going to ride a trolley! Running a ferry up and down the canal is a terrible idea. We won't have any plant or sea animal life there any more. If people on Sand Key wanted to live in an area like Miami Beach, they would have moved there! Barbara Ferree, owner of two condos at 1591 Gulf Blvd. * * * * * * * * * * * * ** It's only a deal if it's where you want to go. Find your travel deal here. (http:/ /information.travel.aol.com / deals ?ncid= aoltrv00050000000047) file://S:\Planning Department \C D B\FLEX (FLD) \Inactive or Finished Applications \Gulf ... 8/19/2009 Wells, Wayne From: Harriger, Sandy Sent: , Monday, July 20, 2009 12:45 PM To: Wells, Wayne; Delk, Michael Cc: Watkins, Sherry Subject: RE: Cabana Club Restaurant Thanks for checking — I will use this information to locate a number. From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Monday, July 20, 2009 12:00 PM To: Delk, Michael; Harriger, Sandy Cc: Watkins, Sherry Subject: Cabana Club Restaurant Checking all emails and electronic letters, this is all I find (no phone numbers): Rich Weismiller - 1582 Gulf Boulevard, #1206, Clearwater, FL 33767 From: Delk, Michael Sent: Monday, July 20, 2009 8:22 AM To: Harriger, Sandy Cc: Watkins, Sherry; Wells, Wayne Subject: RE: Cabana Club Restaurant Wayne — Might any of these be in the file? From: Harriger, Sandy Sent: Friday, July 17, 2009 2:35 PM To: Delk, Michael Cc: Watkins, Sherry Subject: Cabana Club Restaurant Do you have a contact telephone number for any of the following people with ties to the Cabana Club Restaurant? Rich Weismiller Jan LaTour Carl Whitley Sandy Harriger Assistant to the City Manager ,City Manager's Office 727 - 562 -4043 11 aa,a�T +� .eF �- r -• r e £ r PLANNING DEPARTMENT f CITY ®F C LEARWATER POST_ OFFICE BOX 4748, CLEARNGATER, FLORIDA 33758 -4748 MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MTRTLEAVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562 -4567 FAx (727) 562 -4865 October 2 September- 17, 2008 Richard Heisenbottle R. J. Heisenbottle Architects, P.A. 2199 Ponce de Leon Boulevard, Suite 400 Coral Gables, FL 33134 RE: Amended Development Order — Case FLD2008 -02002 1590 Gulf Boulevard Dear Mr. Heisenbottle: This letter constitutes an Amended Development Order pursuant to Section 4- 206.D.6 of the Community Development Code. On September 16, 2008, the Community Development Board reviewed your request for Flexible Development approval to permit a 38 -unit overnight accommodation use in the Commercial (C) District with a reduction to the required lot width from 200 to 88.41 feet, a reduction to the front (east) setback from 25 to five feet (to pavement), a reduction to the side (north) setback from 10 to zero feet (to building), a reduction to the rear (west) setback from the Coastal Construction Control Line (CCCL) from 20 to zero feet and an Increase to bulldmg height from 25 to 67 feet, as a Comprehensive 1111111 Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section, 2- 704.C; and a reduction to the front (east) perimeter buffer from 15 to five feet (to pavement), a reduction to the side (north) perimeter buffer from 10 to zero feet (to building and pavement) and a reduction to the width of interior landscape islands from eight to 4.6 feet inside curbing, as a Comprehensive Landscape Program, under the provisions of Section 3- 1202.G. The Community Development Board (CDB) APPROVED the application with the following Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and Conditions of Approval: Findings of Fact: 1. The 1.38 total acres (0.96 acres zoned Commercial District landward of the Coastal Construction Control Line [CCCL]; 0.42 acres zoned Open Space/Recreation and Preservation Districts seaward of the CCCL) is located on the west side of Gulf Boulevard, approximately 1,100 feet north of the City limits line between Clearwater and Belleair; 2. The site is irregularly shaped, having previously been part of the Cabana Club residential property to the north as its clubhouse and "members only" restaurant for the condominiums, built in the early 1980's; This parcel was conveyed separately in the early 1990's, litigated and determined to be a legal parcel, and has been operated as a public restaurant with no association to any hotel and with only 49 existing parking spaces until 1998 when it closed; 4 October 2 Sq te_�_ 17, 2008 Heisenbottle — Page 2 4. The City Council on September 21, 2000, denied a land use plan map amendment to change the land use category from Commercial General (CG) to Residential High (RH) and to rezone from Commercial (C) District to High Density Residential (HDR) District. A companion Flexible Development application to permit a 10 -story (99 -foot tall), 20 -unit attached dwelling condominium project with the swimming pool located seaward of the Coastal Construction Control Line was subsequently withdrawn; 5. On November 19, 2002, the CDB approved a Flexible Development application to permit the re- establish of the restaurant use on this property, utilizing the existing setbacks to building and pavement, not only for guests of the hotel but open to the general public. This application included use of the pool and beach, and its restrooms and lockers, for guests of the Belleview Biltmore Hotel only; 6. The site is presently developed with a two -story over an open ground floor restaurant of 7,054 square feet of enclosed floor area and an outdoor cafe on the third floor of 1,916 square feet, with a current Business Tax Receipt (occupational license) permitting a maximum of 305 seats; 7. The upland portion of the site east of the CCCL has historically been zoned commercial (until the Shoppes at Sand Key was recently rezoned to Commercial District) and is the only parcel on Sand Key with commercial land use; 8. There is an existing seawall, presently buried beneath the sand, located approximately 25 feet west of the northwest corner of the existing building/CCCL and approximately 50 feet from the CCCL in the southwest corner of the site. There is an existing perpetual easement for pedestrian passage located adjacent to the east side of the seawall. The subject property extends onto the beach area west of the seawall between 50 — 60 feet; 9. The proposal is to redevelop the site with a 38- room/unit, 67 -foot tall, boutique overnight accommodation use with accessory uses including a restaurant, pool, men's and women's locker rooms exercise. room nnrl hParhfrnnt rahana.s• 10. The proposed hotel will be operated by the same hotel operator as the Belleview Biltmore Hotel in the Town of Belleair, providing guests of the Belleview Biltmore Hotel with a beachfront experience; 11. The proposal includes a reduction to the minimum lot width to that which exists today of 88.41 feet. Since the adjacent properties are developed with residential condominiums, it is highly unlikely, if not impossible, that additional land can be added to the subject property to attain even the 100 feet of lot width required for permissible uses in the Commercial District; 12. The site design locates the proposed building on the northern portion of the site basically in the same location as the existing building. The taller portion of the building for the 38 hotel rooms is located approximately 30 feet from a property/building corner of the Cabana Club condominiums and 10 feet from the south property line; 13. The surrounding area is dominated by residential development in a built -out condition; 14. The proposed building will be located adjacent to the CCCL at a zero -foot setback,, much like the adjacent Cabana Club condominium building; 15. The adjacent Cabana Club condominium building is located at a zero -foot setback on two sides with this site (a third boundary is less than required setbacks) and the condominium building. roof eaves overhang the subject site; 16. This site shares a common driveway with the Cabana Club condominiums, which will be maintained in its present location; 17. The proposed structure setbacks are consistent with existing setbacks on adjacent residential properties; J . 1- -7 October 2 Septem"er -17r, 2008 Heisenbottle — Page 3 18. The proposed design of the Cabana Club reflects the architecture of the historic Belleview Biltmore Hotel for identification and marketing purposes, as well as the Cabana Club condominium buildings located to the immediate north of the site; 19. Eight, 10 feet x 10 feet, temporary cabana structures are proposed approximately 25 feet seaward (west) of the CCCL. The Florida Department of Environmental Protection must approve of these structures being seaward of the CCCL; 20. The proposal includes an increase to the building height to 67 feet, measured to the midpoint of the pitched roof. The proposed building height is lower than, but consistent with, the majority of the building heights of the surrounding residential buildings; 21. The minimum number of required parking spaces is 38 parking spaces, while 56 parking spaces are proposed for this hotel. Accessory uses are not required additional parking by Code; 22. There is no outstanding Code Enforcement issue associated with the subject property. Conclusions of Law: 1. That the development proposal is consistent with the Standards as per Section 2 -701.1 and Table 2- 704 of the Community Development Code; 2. That the development proposal is consistent with the Flexibility criteria as per Section 2 -704.0 of the Community Development Code; 3. That the development proposal is consistent with the General Standards for Level Two Approvals as per Section 3 -913 of the Community Development Code; and 4. The proposal is compatible with the adjacent land uses. Conditions of Approval: 1. That the final design and color of the building be consistent with the conceptual elevations approved by the BYOB; 2. That, prior to the issuance of any permits, in order to maintain the operational, management and marketing characteristics with the Belleview Biltmore Hotel in the Town of Belleair, a deed restriction, acceptable to and enforceable by the City, be recorded in the public records requiring common operation and management by the same hotel operator. Should this common operation and management be discontinued, this site shall be required to reduce the size of the accessory restaurant to a square footage more in line with a 38- room/unit hotel, acceptable to the Planning Department; 3. That, either the site plan reflect the relocation of the public access sidewalk to be within the existing access easement on the Dan's Island condominium property prior to the issuance of any permits, or a public access easement for that portion of the encroaching sidewalk onto the western portion of this property be recorded prior to the issuance of the .Certificate of Occupancy for this project; 4. That no structure, landscaping, or other site improvement block, obstruct or impede pedestrian access within the Perpetual Public Easement Area for Pedestrian Passage adjacent to the seawall; 5. That sea -turtle friendly light fixtures be employed with the site design, with compliance demonstrated on plans acceptable to the Environmental Engineering Division, prior to the issuance of building permits; 6. That, prior to the issuance of any permits, the condition rating of the existing trees be shown on the spreadsheet; 7. That, prior to the issuance of any permits, the civil and landscape plans be amended to widen the landscape island east of the loading space to be eight feet wide inside curbing; 8. That any future freestanding sign be a monument -style sign, designed to match the exterior materials and color of the building, at a maximum height of six feet; K October 2 Septem�6r -17, 2008 Heisenbottle — Page 4 9. That, prior to the issuance of any permits, compliance with all requirements of General Engineering, Traffic Engineering and Stormwater Engineering be met; 10. That any applicable Public Art and Design Impact Fee be paid prior to the issuance of any permits; and 11. That all Parks and Recreation fees be paid prior to the issuance of any permits. Pursuant to Section 4 -407, an application for a building permit or other approvals shall be made within two one years of Flexible Development approval (by September 16, 2010 240). All required certificates of occupancy shall be obtained within two years of the date of issuance of the initial building permit. The building permit must be obtained within six months of the initial permit application. This timeframe to obtain the initial building permit may be extended for an additional six months for cause by the Community Development Coordinator. Time frames do not change with successive owners. The Community Development Coordinator may grant an extension of time for the Flexible Development approval for a period not to exceed one year and only within the original period of validity. The issuance of this Development Order does not relieve you of the necessity to obtain any building permits or pay any impact fees that may be required. In order to facilitate the issuance of any permit or license affected by this approval, please bring a copy of this letter with you when applying for any permits or licenses that require this prior development approval. Additionally, an appeal of a Level Two approval (Flexible Development) may be initiated pursuant to Section 4 -502.B by the applicant or by any person granted party status within 14 days of the date of the CDB meeting. The filing of an application/notice of appeal shall stay the effect of the decision pending the final determination of the case. The appeal period for your case expires on September 30, 2008 (14 days from the date of the CDB meeting). If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call Wayne M. Wells, Planner III, at 727 -562 -4504. You can access zoning information for parcels within the City through our website: «,NNov. mycleai -,,vater.com /gov,`deptsiplannin g. Sincerely, Michael e k, Planning Director S: (Planning Department IC D BIFLEX (FLD)1lnactive or Finished Applications l Gulf 1590 Belleview Biltmore Cabana Club (C) -Approved 2008 - WWIGulf 1590 Development Order Amended 10.2.08.doc PROJECT TEAM ARCHITECTURE: RJ HEISENBOTTLE ARCHriECTS 2199 PONCE DE LEON BLVD., SUITE 400 CORAL GABLES, FL, 33134 TELEPHONE: 305.446.7799 FAX: 305.446 9275 FLORIDA REGISTRATION NUMBER: AR 0010865 CIVIL: FLORIDA DESIGN CONSULTANTS 3030 STARKEY BLVD NEW PORT RICHEY, FL, 34655 TELEPHONE: 727.849.7588 FAX: 727.848.3648 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE: WRT DESIGN 191 GIRALDA AVENUE, PENTHOUSE CORAL GABLES, FL, 33134 TELEPHONE: 305.448.0788 FAX- 305.443.8431 STRUCTURE: DOUGLAS WOOD AND ASSOCIATES, INC 299 ALHAMBRA CIRCLE, SUITE 510 CORAL GABLES FL, 33134 TELEPHONE: 305.461.3450 FAX: 305.461.3650 MECHANICAL, ELECTRICAL, AND PLUMBING. GARTEK 7210 SW 39TH TERRACE MIAMI, FL, 33155 TELEPHONE 305.266.8997 FAX: 305.264.9496 INTERIORS: RTKL 1500 SAN REMO AVENUE, SUITE 350 CORAL GABLES, FL, 33146 TELEPHONE: 786.2683200 FAX= 786.2683201 1"My ILJ EW .31 A (LBAN J. 1590 Gulf 'Boulevard, Clearwater, Florida SCHEMAT DE5O"0'6 G JULY 141- 2008 BELLElIEW BILTMORE HOTEL AND RESORT QML C -1 COVER SHEET C -2 EXISTING CONDITIONS AND DEMOLITION PLAN C -3 SITE PLAN C -4 PAVING, GRADING, AND DRAINAGE PLAN C -5 STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN (SWPP) AND CSWMP C -6 UTILITY PLAN C -7 FIRE ACCESS PLAN C -8 PAVING, GRADING, AND DRAINAGE DETAILS C -9 PAVING, GRADING, AND DRAINAGE DETAILS C -10 UTILITY DETAILS C -11 UTILITY DETAILS ' LANDSCAPE L -6.01 TREE DISPOSITION PLAN L -6.02 PLANTING PLAN L -6.03 POOL DECK PLANTING PLAN L -6.04 PLANTING DETAILS L -6.05 IRRIGATION NOTES ARCHITECTURE A -6.00 A -6.01 A -6.02 A -6.03 A -6.04 A -6.05 A -6.06 A -6.07 A -6.08 EAST ELEVATION RENDERING WEST ELEVATION RENDERING GROUND FLOOR PLAN FIRST FLOOR PLAN 2ND - 5TH FLOOR PLANS ROOF PLAN EAST ELEVATION WEST ELEVATION NORTH AND SOUTH ELEVATIONS ,91TE PLAN APPROVED CASE # 990 —n ZUOZ CASE TYPE -- DRC DATES 1 D ~' 71310 $ CUI3 DATE oB� 9ll u1o8 SIGNATURE DATE 1590 GULF BLVD FLD2008 -02002 8ELLEVIEW BILTMORE CABANA CLUB Zoning: C atlas# 31 1A L 6' 7 L i S i D a 1 f .J z t 'N .,X 4, c+ - rt. f %t t PARCEL VI - CABANA CLUB PROPERTY - LEASEHOLD ESTATE: BEING A PART OF THE SOUTH 474.02 FEET OF GOVERNMENT LOT 2 IN SECTION 19, TOWNSHIP 29 SOUTH, RANGE 15 EAST, PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA AND BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCE AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 19; THENCE NORTH 89 DEG. 04' 07" WEST, ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SECTION FOR 2351.90 FEET TO A POINT ON THE WESTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF GULF BOULEVARD (STATE ROAD 699) A 100 FOOT RIGHT OF WAY; SAID POINT BEING THE POINT OF BEGINNING (P.O.B.); THENCE CONTINUE NORTH 89 DEG. 04' 07" WEST FOR 400.09 FEET TO A POINT ON THE EROSION CONTROL LINE AS ESTABLISHED IN BULKHEAD PLAT BOOK 2, PAGE 65 AND ALSO RECORDED IN OR BOOK 5141, PAGE 1590, THENCE NORTH 24 DEG. 39' 22" EAST, ALONG SAID EROSION CONTROL LINE FOR 217.93 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 68 DEG. 10' 45" EAST, FOR 100.35 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 20 DEG. 00' 14" EAST FOR 7.66 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 65 DEG. 00' 14" EAST, FOR 16.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 24 DEG. 59 46 WEST FOR 4.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 65 DEG. 00' 14" EAST FOR 41.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 24 DEG. 59' 46" EAST FOR 56.96 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 65 DEG. 00' 14" EAST FOR 50.25 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 58 DEG. 01' 40" EAST FOR 165.71 FEET TO A POINT ON THE AFOREDESCRIBED WEST RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF GULF BOULEVARD; THENCE SOUTH 31 DEG. 58' 20" WEST FOR 88.41 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. TOGETHER WITH THE RIGHTS OF INGRESS AND EGRESS AS RECITED IN THAT CERTAIN CORRECTIVE WARRANTY DEED RECORDED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 5785, PAGE 1279, ON JUNE 19, 1984, PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA. TOGETHER WITH THE REVERSIONARY INTEREST SET FORTH IN THAT CERTAIN CORRECTIVE WARRANTY DEED RECORDED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 5785, PAGE 1279, PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA, I. ALL MATERIALS AND CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE MORE STRINGENT TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS AS FOUND IN THE STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER OR THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS AS PREPARED BY FLORIDA DESIGN CONSULTANTS, INC. SPECIFICALLY FOR T -IS PROJECT. 2. THE JURISDICTIONAL AGENCY FOR THIS PROJECT IS THE CITY OF CLEARWATER. 3. THE LOCATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES ARE APPROXIMATE AS SHOWN ON THE PLANS AND IT IS THE CONTRACTORS RESPONSIBILITY TO DETERMINE THE EXACT LOCATION OF THE UTILITIES PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION IN THEIR VICINITY. 4, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL USE APPROPRIATE MEASURES TO PREVENT EROSION AND TRANSPORT OF SEDIMENT MATERIAL TO INLETS, SURFACE DRAINS, LAKES AND WETLAND AREAS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL USE STRAW BALES, SILT BARRIERS OR OTHER APPROPRIATE MEASURES TO MITIGATE ADVERSE IMPACTS TO EXISTING SURFACE WATER QUALITY. 5. THE CONTRACTOR IS TO CONTROL ALL FUGITIVE DUST ORIGINATING ON THE PROJECT BY WATERING OR OTHER METHODS AS REQUIRED. 6 NO DEBRIS SHALL BE ALLOWED TO ENTER THE EXISTING SANITARY AND STORM SYSTEMS. 7. ARCHITECTURAL INFORMATION PROVIDED BY ARCHITECTS. 8. BACKFLOW PREVENTION DEVICES MUST BE INSTALLED BY THE CITY. 9. LOCATIONS OF TRASH DUMPSTER TO BE COORDINATED WITH THE CITY OF CLEARWATER. 10. SITE LANDSCAPING WILL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 3 -1202 OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE. 11. THE SITE IS LOCATED WITHIN FLOOD ZONES VE (EL.16), VE (EL.14), VE (EL,13), VE (EL.12), AND AE (EL.12) [NAVD 881 PER FEMA FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP, COMMUNITY PANEL NO 12103C0104G, MAP REVISED SEPTEMBER 3, 2003. 12. SITE LIGHTING SHALL BE PROVIDED IN COMPLIANCE WITH CITY OF CLEARWATER CODE REQUIREMENTS AND SHALL BE DIRECTED DOWNWARD AND AWAY FROM ADJACENT RESIDENTIAL AREAS. ADDITIONALLY, LIGHTING WILL BE DIRECTED AWAY FROM THE BEACH ZONE IN CONFORMANCE WITH SEA TURTLE NESTING GUIDELINES PROMULGATED BY THE FLORIDA FISH & WILDLIFE CONSERVATION COMMISSION (FF &WCC). 13. DRAINAGE FOR ALL PARKING LEVELS UNDER THE BUILDING WILL BE DIRECTED TO THE PROPOSED DRAINAGE SYSTEM TO ACCOMMODATE WATER QUALITY REQUIREMENTS FOR THE PROJECT. 14. TREE REMOVAL PERMIT APPLICATION TO BE SUBMITTED AT TIME OF CONSTRUCTION PLAN SUBMITTAL. A 15. MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL FOR THE HOTEL SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ROLLING OUT DUMPSTERS TO STAGING AREA ON COLLECTION DAYS. 16. BUILDING TO BE SPRINKLED. 17. CONSTRUCTION PLANS TO SHOW FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTION TO BE AT LEAST 15 FEET FROM THE BUILDING BUT WITHIN 40 FEET OF A HYDRANT 18. FUTURE SIGN MUST MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF CODE AND ANY FUTURE FREESTANDING SIGN BE A MONUMENT -STYLE SIGN A MAXIMUM FOUR FEET IN HEIGHT, DESIGNED TO MATCH THE EXTERIOR MATERIALS AND COLOR OF THE BUILDING. NOTE: THE CONTRACTOR IS TO CONTACT SUNSHINE STATE ONE CALL OF FLORIDA INC., (800) 432 -4770 TWO FULL BUSINESS DAYS PRIOR TO BEGINNING ANY WORK. 1' .r. =1 'ys L :fx S rif' as v� .rKJ' �e k �JS�� JS ZuJ 1sz�JSV w f• , f, �+wrt t a4.'c t s 1. 1'- Ni! } H 'Yd r -. ``L �rr,4S'4 • - y�'x r: PROJEC LOCATIO Owner: PRO,. LOCA 1 •' Architect: Landscape Architect: Belleview Biltmore Owner, LLC R.J. Heisenbottle Architects, P.A. Wallace Roberts & Todd, LLC c \o Legg Mason Real Estate Investors 2199 Ponce De Leon Boulevard, Suite 400 191 Giralda Avenue, Penthouse 10880 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 1750 Coral Gables, FL 33134 Coral Gables, FL 33134 1 Los Angeles, California 90024 Phone: 305 - 446 -7799 Phone: 305- 448 -0788 Phone: 310- 234 -2100 Fax: 305 - 446 -9275 Fax: 305 - 443 - -8431 SHEET C -1 C-2 C -3 C-4 C-5 C-6 C -7 C- 8 to C- 9 C -10 to C -11 ZONING DISTRICT A LAND USE A TOTAL AREA A ZONE C ZONE OS /R ZONE P LOT WIDTH BUILDING COVERAGE IMPERVIOUS SURFACE RATIO (ISR) A ZONE C ZONE OS /R ZONE P NUMBER OF UNITS S . 'TITLE COVER SHEET EXISTING CONDITIONS AND DEMOLITION PLAN SITE PLAN PAVING, GRADING, AND DRAINAGE PLAN STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN (SWPP) AND CSWMP UTILITY PLAN FIRE ACCESS PLAN PAVING, GRADING, AND DRAINAGE DETAILS UTILITY DETAILS LAND USE DATA EXISTING PROPOSED C (COMMERCIAL) C (COMMERCIAL) OS /R (OPEN SPACE /RECREATIONAL) OS /R (OPEN SPACE /RECREATIONAL) P (PRESERVATION) P (PRESERVATION) C -G (COMMERCIAL- GENERAL) R /OS (RECREATION /OPEN SPACE) P (PRESERVATION) SETBACKS (BUILDINGS) Q FRONT (EAST) SIDE (NORTH) SIDE (SOUTH) REAR (WEST) FROM CCCL REAR (WEST) FROM SEAWALL SETBACKS (OTHER STRUCTURES) Q FRONT (EAST) SIDE (NORTH) SIDE (SOUTH) REAR (WEST) FROM CCCL REAR (WEST) FROM SEAWALL HEIGHT VEHICULAR USE AREA PARKING LOT INTERIOR LANDSCAPING (SF AND % OF PAVED VEHICULAR USE AREA) PARKING TOTAL HANDICAP (INCLUDE IN TOTAL NUMBER) 1.38 AC 59,956 SF 0.96 AC 41,963 SF 0.19 AC 8,119 SF 0.23 AC 9,874 SF 88.4' 0.16 AC 7,130 SF 0.77 AC (80 %) 33,603 SF 0 AC (0 %) 0.0 SF 0 AC (0 %) 0.0 SF 0 C -G (COMMERCIAL- GENERAL) R /OS (RECREATION /OPEN SPACE) P (PRESERVATION) 1.38 AC 59,956 SF 0.96 AC 41,963 SF 0.19 AC 8,119 SF 0.23 AC 9,874 SF 88.4' 0.43 AC 18,604 SF 0.75 AC (78 %) 32,575 SF 0 AC (0 %) 0.0 SF 0 AC (0 %) 0,0 SF 38 REQUIRED (MIN /MAX) [1] 0.92 AC 40,000 SF MIN 200' MAX 95% MAX 60% MAX 20% ON AREA EASTAOF C CCLD (ZONE C) 145' 144.7' 25' 0' 0' 0' -10' 5' 10' 0' -10' 0' 0' 10' -20' 22' 22' 18' 5' 0' 5' 0' 22' 37,4' 0.45 AC/19,764 SF 0.08 AC/3,569 SF 18% 44 2 5' 25' 0' 0' -10' 10' 0' -10' 0' 10' -20' 22' 18' 67' 25'-50' © 0,33 AC/14,523 SF - ® 0.04 AC/1,920 SF 10% (OF REQUIRED PARKING) 13% 12% (OF AREA IN EXCESS OF 110% OF REQUIRED PARKING) 56 3 [1] REQUIREMENTS ARE BASED ON THE CITY OF CLEARWATER COMPREHENSIVE INFILL STANDARDS. [2] HEIGHT IS ELEVATION ABOVE FEMA BASE ELEVATION "14 ". Civil Engineer /Surveyor: Florida Design Consultants, Inc. 3030 Starkey Boulevard New Port Richey, FL 34655 Phone: 727 - 849 -7588 Fax: 727 - 848 -3648 1.0 SPACE PER UNIT OR, 38 SPACES 77 T z. e t' R e A 7/09/08 REVISED VEH. USE AREA AND INT. LANDSCAPING PER C.O.C. DRC COMMENTS (7/3/08) 1A 6/11/08 REVISED GENERAL NOTE 15 AND REVISED LAND USE DATA TABLE PER C.O.C. DRC COMMENTS (5/1/08) L. r- � I -!4 Date 1/31/Od EPN 263 JOB NO. 2007 -025A _y REPAIR SEAWALL - O CAP AS SHOWN ON SHEET C -4 v �o ECL BPB 3, PG 14 - J x- Q Q- Q 6 �� CONC SEAWALL (2.0' WIDE) (SEE DETAIL 2) BURIED TEMPORARY CABANA- • STRUCTU© (TYP,) N29'05'11 "E(BPB -2) 0. 3'(C) 49.63'(C• ECL) LEGEND • = Project Boundary X61.1 = Existing Spot Elevation OD = Existing Storm Structure WM = Existing Water Main C3 = Exisitng FEMA Boundary r = Standard Straight Curb I E I=> = Traffic Directional Arrows co '2 c$ = -. 4 ^ R 3zc x = ADA Accessible Path cO N 0 '> 1 `r v n: CL M C 0 C O v ,0 •••� '1 u DESIGNED THE SIGNATURE OF THE OVALITY E CONTROL OFFICER IN THIS SPACE :n E JD INDICATES THAT ALL REQUIRED DRAWN PERMITS HAVE BEEN OBTAINED o RD /JEB AND THAT CONSTRUCTION IS Q AUTHORIZED TO COMMENCE. CHECKED 3 O L OC .3 O.C. '0 a> `1 Cd s941(C, \ 70 Fq) • _ / STOP = Stop Sign - R1 -1 (30 "00 ") O = Do Not Enter - R5 -1 (24 "X24 ") = Interior Landscaped Areas A Limits Of Proposed Building Concrete Pavement FLORIDA DESIGN C ®NSIIL i "N I oy INC. ENGINEERS, ENVIRONMENTALISTS, SURVEYORS 8 PLANNERS 3030 Starkey Blvd, New Port Richey FL 34655 Tel: (727) 849 -7588 - Fax: (727) 848 -3648 E.B. No. 7421 /e __1\ pM 15" 1 P 21" STUM -P PM� � 3� 'tUt51 KIAIN4 Vtt11L:ULAK JAt't I T AIU': . SPECIFIC SIGNAGE ALERTING EXITING TRAFFIC OF PEDESTRIAN :ROSSING(S). !. MIRROR INSTALLATIOINS TO AID IN BOTH, PEDESTRIANS /VEHICLES, IISIBILITY. i. INSTALL SIGNS THAT READ "MOTORIST, PLEASE USE MIRRORS WHEN IAt%LeIAI/� Al IT" PREPARED FOR, R.J. HEISENBOTTLE ARCHITECTS, P.A. 2199 PONCE DE LEON BOULEVARD, SUITE 400 CORAL GABLES, FLORIDA 33134 PHONE: (305) 446 -7799 FAX: (305) 446 -9275 N i � 0 10 20 40 C/ 4 _l / � O •s• 01 CONC / cG,pe / � �ryAJ PM 1 / 1 PLANTER (TYP) / `ootio — SANITATION TRUCK PATH ` PM © 20'x20' s / CONC SIGHT TRIANGLE oo�G 5, # /. 1 (TYP.) TYP / 0 cotio l� o �� A v 8' T2 / 3 / �QZ FDOT INDEX 304 % X as / PSIGN BY /►%'' OTHERS 5 4 2). 2 ^` CR21 . D 22 FDOT INDEX 304 Rg / F- 0 21 2 W Q �c4' N /F � P 20 TrA S 3" STUMP _ l .QO♦ ISTORMWATER © I� 19 'REATMENT VAULT / o G E 15 16 17 1I / _ C, .i., �� C �--y P =c, 2. 1 10•• Q % _ /PM �3,� PM C2° pM G\ A 15 "1a`� 16" CONC VAULT v °= Pv / (POWER) S © PM v �o I1° / O / / / / 00 D D V GJ s� SHEET DESCRIPTION, BELLEVIEW BILTMORE CABANA CLUB 7/14/( SITE PLAN SITE PLAN 1 4/3/C NO. DATE / ;. �C, \ BLOW OFF VALVE / / C 0 , O v ,0 •••� '1 /e __1\ pM 15" 1 P 21" STUM -P PM� � 3� 'tUt51 KIAIN4 Vtt11L:ULAK JAt't I T AIU': . SPECIFIC SIGNAGE ALERTING EXITING TRAFFIC OF PEDESTRIAN :ROSSING(S). !. MIRROR INSTALLATIOINS TO AID IN BOTH, PEDESTRIANS /VEHICLES, IISIBILITY. i. INSTALL SIGNS THAT READ "MOTORIST, PLEASE USE MIRRORS WHEN IAt%LeIAI/� Al IT" PREPARED FOR, R.J. HEISENBOTTLE ARCHITECTS, P.A. 2199 PONCE DE LEON BOULEVARD, SUITE 400 CORAL GABLES, FLORIDA 33134 PHONE: (305) 446 -7799 FAX: (305) 446 -9275 N i � 0 10 20 40 C/ 4 _l / � O •s• 01 CONC / cG,pe / � �ryAJ PM 1 / 1 PLANTER (TYP) / `ootio — SANITATION TRUCK PATH ` PM © 20'x20' s / CONC SIGHT TRIANGLE oo�G 5, # /. 1 (TYP.) TYP / 0 cotio l� o �� A v 8' T2 / 3 / �QZ FDOT INDEX 304 % X as / PSIGN BY /►%'' OTHERS 5 4 2). 2 ^` CR21 . D 22 FDOT INDEX 304 Rg / F- 0 21 2 W Q �c4' N /F � P 20 TrA S 3" STUMP _ l .QO♦ ISTORMWATER © I� 19 'REATMENT VAULT / o G E 15 16 17 1I / _ C, .i., �� C �--y P =c, 2. 1 10•• Q % _ /PM �3,� PM C2° pM G\ A 15 "1a`� 16" CONC VAULT v °= Pv / (POWER) S © PM v �o I1° / O / / / / 00 D D V GJ s� SHEET DESCRIPTION, BELLEVIEW BILTMORE CABANA CLUB 7/14/( SITE PLAN SITE PLAN 1 4/3/C NO. DATE / ;. �C, \ BLOW OFF VALVE / / C 0 E a� n c 0 3 3 O L .3 a> U 7 O 0 ,n e�% t y •--I C 3 LD .a t,'(� o E n o� U c O U _0 C 0 :n N c 0 3 to .Ib c 0 S �* ♦a • U a k ,10 , „o. 201,7 -,25A °v REV. INTERIOR LANDSCAPED AREAS PER C.O.C. DRC PER COMMENTS (7/3/08)' , ', C- o 0 ON P REV. BLDG & PARKING LAYOUT, ACCESS PATH, DUMPSTER LOC. LOADING AREA, ` �. ° • .. ° STORM VAULT, SETBACKS; ADDED SAN TRUCK PATH, TEMP CABANAS AND FDOT g F.B. `a` PG. 1 SHT. S/W RAMPS PER C.O.C. DRC COMMENTS (5/1/08); ADDED SEAWALL CAP NOTE r- .21 ADDED MORE DIMENSIONS PER CITY OF CLEARWATER COMMENTS DATE, 1/31/08 11 a 0 ABPY'D REVISIONS OF iJ DRAINAGE CRITERIA 1. TREATMENT - THE FIRST ONE -HALF INCH (0.5 ") OF RUNOFF. BECAUSE DISCHARGE TO OUTSTANDING FLORIDA WATER (OFW), NEED 150% TREATMENT. THEREFORE, TREAT THE FIRST THREE - QUARTERS INCH (0.75 ") OF RUNOFF. � � l C5 Cd X ^ . METAL ''TAIRS CONC WALT_ O r V wlIDC) ELEV. 7.5 / / . 09 - METAL DECK 0 �1 x LY 8 �V 7: r RTH SIDE COMMON Ve'ALI / N i \' , / Q - 0 / REPAIR E W S A ALL CAP b /AS ON THIS V SHEET AN i v' '6 A r X X f / _ G 1• t ;r A- / P ECL B B 3 PC 14 / x - `F. z - t.: J ti- C9 - - ,c y' 4c•� • .s V X - .S U to ,' 4 r- h / m C x - ' / rp - - I. Q x 0` n• NN +6; H _ +t . V i Q ,!e 1 / to - / r r d x J XF; C 2 n - 0 - x V G / X 1' „ r,y `.t N / 1r A:.i b, GRAD s IP C l "1 ELEVATION 7.5 / i` ,I I; / aC^ y�. QJ 1V /i i CONC SEAWALL \ (2.0' WIDE) \ (SEE DETAIL 2) BURIED i ELEV. 7.5 I i x N29'05'11 "E((©PB -2) 0 93'(C) x c A 49 63'(C, E:CL) x ca r- -Uhl t .. t 3" oric �M J;N.6ER ` (,W UA/ 9.. r, X i x?' k x 11 "IS 0-13 - L I NE LINE BEARING I DISTANCE -- -- - - "----- --- r -- -- - -- L1(L.CZ _ S20'00 14 E _ 7.66' _ L2 L,C _ 565'00'14 "E 1 16.00'_1 - -- -- - -- ._ _. 1 I._3(L.C} S24'S9'4G "W — - -4:00' A NOTE: ELEVATIONS OF UPPER FLOORS CAN BE DERIVED FROM THE INFORMATION PROVIDED ON ARCHITECTURAL PLAN SHEET A -8. In X SLOPE TO MATCH EXISTING GROUND SLOPE TO MATCH EXISTING GROUND / AT PROPERTY LINE VARIES AT PROPERTY LINE VARIES V -10' / ELEV, 7.5 ELEV. 7.5 hen MEET EXISTING GRADE 5;1 g ;1 MEET EXISTING GRADE EXISTING GROUN D — /v EXISTING GROUND /� � n "' SECTION B SECTION C b fir /�iNTS NTS ; 1 112 `i� / \;N! r:,t! EI -d 8"), tP / 0 10 20 40 zt" s1u Cla/ / � \._ / � / J j rC �2h "RCP tilV) -( )' �F'• / C) `COON / X 10" ) / \r '2 "17,,1/X / �F+ 9 �,13., V 1 �C/ LF,� /10 / r 110% S�i,�M� \ o h� /r•:% (" / ,� W X :....... .. ', vjj / \�i / /r'+� /� �i �• // ,.,/ / / 'J � / � 7 C *` /wv. \ X h 4 \ t� / / r p Ct,• r f� 'C � i \ 1 /r< \ ' ,• UPON PROJECT ECT COMPLETION i" i ra \ , CONTRACTOR r ��• i / R SHALL / r / C /r ' . .., RESTORE REPAIR THE FU , ....:::::.::::.:.:�::•..;: LL WIDTH C �) OF THE G IN RESS EGRESS / / ................... ................... _ K EASEMENT, AS REQUIRED. r / 1 A r r t. i / , r i / / i/. J / r X a \� / ,y 1 / X4 f.l r l % , t I �l J` c' AN R P f T1, t L t % i\. / •r \ t- / / i r J , r 1 /Ik � \ �1 /z/ c ti f 'O• F i f l Q S _ °7 'r. x -AI / '.l / R 9 h 5 / / •X �J N .L y 3' / h^ / r J C O 6 V 7 6 r.. / 1 r f '' i f . •r0' .y f t' r' O 7 .J \ 6 1 t' 1 •o -� \ .�.r�:::�' z / ACCESS MANHOLE COVER —t' © SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT CERTIFICATION CONSTRUCTION SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN ( CSWMP) 1. THE CSWMP CONSISTS OF PLAN SHEETS C-2, C-4 AND C -5 SHOWING EROSION PROTECTION DEVICES TO BE UTILIZED ON THE PROJECT. © 2. THE APPLICANT /OWNER OR AUTHORIZED AGENT HAS REVIEWED THE CSWMP AND HAS SIGNED THE CSWMP WHERE REQUIRED BELOW. ELEV. 7.5 OF THE FINAL CONSTRUCTION PLANS FOR THE PERMITTED SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT y ' ELEV. 5.41— — -- —� — E SIGNATURE: NAME: DATE: J SEAWALL NOTES: 00 1 F ® I 1. ALL REPAIR WORK SUBJECT TO FDEP PERMITTING AS APPLICANT OWNER AUTHORIZED AGENT (SITE CONTRACTOR) 00 1 WELL AS, ANY OTHER PERMITTING REQUIRED. N 2. CONTRACTOR TO INCLUDE THE SERVICES OF A FLORIDA REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER TO DESIGN, SEAWALL CAP DETAIL INSPECT, AND CERTIFY RETAINING WALL CONSTRUCTION, 3 NTS AS PART OF THE RETAINING WALL COSTS. 0 a. a M a DESIGNED THE SIGNATURE OF THE QUALITY PREPARED FOR, CONTROL OFFICER IN THIS SPACE E 2 JD INDICATES THAT ALL REQUIRED � /��' DRAWN PERMITS HAVE BEEN OBTAINED FLORIDA DESIGN CONSUL A INC, I \ ®� ®pl \�7(r�/� y RD /JEB AND THAT CONSTRUCTION IS ENGINEERS, ENVIRONMENTALISTS, SURVEYORS S' PLANNERS a AUTHORIZED TO COMMENCE. CHECKED 0 3030 Starkey Blvd, New Port Richey FL 34655 i OC Tel: (727) 849 -7586 - Fax: (727) 648 -3648 O.C. N Y E.B. No. 7421 x \3 i Qi, 4 R.J. HEISENBOTTLE ARCHITECTS, P.A. 2199 PONCE DE LEON BOULEVARD, SUITE 400 CORAL GABLES, FLORIDA 33134 PHONE: (305) 446 -7799 FAX: (305) 446 -9275 v A\ / 0 F•0 JAY i, j // r � / •l i , V A 2• h. M r >r / o ti t � 1 c Q / . G Y r < 5 , / M v ti 1 0 C< b- 1 ('t I S' •r ............ L) Y _ / l 0 _j ix L Q / t V S / 0 T h' ti X t r e- J 2 'O ( b' ice\ "_ SIN, — Al / •r Q C` / r V / W F ) ti / x / f A O • Bt ON OFF VALVE ASTORM CLEANOUT *CONNECTION TO EXISTING INLET / LAT: 27 -56 -22 ;< ' / �\ / SUBJECT TO APPROVAL OF LONG: - 82 -50 -18 / �� `k `�'� STORMWATER CONNECTION PERMIT. PERMIT APPROVAL WILL BE A / o CONDITION OF BUILDING PERMIT. 2' W gr MODIFY EXISTING INLET N RIM EL =4,71' IE t6 PVC H)=1.53' `\ 1 IF (24 "RCP NE) (- )C 40' IE (iF"RrP .;W) =O 1 \ A N RRvI EL =4.98' IE (18 °RCP NE) =0.0 4' IE 1 12 • e2 GJ ( IE 18 f CPS) =2 0 1 T / / / / ✓ 1_)6 \ \rJC i � � :ONC :•E.A:KA!.I. \ c `' , � , � 0� / / rte\ �� / / - --- — -- —•\ \ � - - -' l r - - ` - -- -- -- -- CC`NC VAULT - -- 0;i1' (POWER) x ` o - _ ci / / `iJ 'N RIM ?-' \ u�i IV RIM EL =4.70' / / IE (I i JCP PiE) =(-)/) 7 ; i ""LEGEND •� t< !E (G "PVC E) =1 ;E- (15 "RCP CE) =t7 25' / e ( & °;cP tv) =( -)0 1't' C A / IE ,'PVC NW)=090' . • = Boundary Line 0 / %A?,/ Easement Line ��o -- - - - _ / 1 -- - - - - -- -- -- - - -- - - - -- - = Right -Of -Way Line o / w , J1---- RIM EL= -4 98' 9 e 3 = Concentrated Drains Ir (6 "P'VC NE) -1 93' E rr,"PVC SW) =1.73' Flow Direction j IE (I5'RCP NIN) =167' �y v = Proposed Spot Elevation cx3 ° o xb (Pavement) A. Proposed Spot Elevation (Pavement and Curb) "' o Y � = Existing Spot Elevation Proposed Storm Structure L' &Pipe o / c Existing Tree to Remain E rn X ��n'� j /�/ ,.��" 0 = Proposed Construction Fence Cl/% = Proposed Silt Fence ° ��\ /A, 0 r RPA EL= 5.21' \ /f �IE 0`1. ,RCP NE) -0.97' / / yf 2 Aw,_„ /'E (15 "rcr S) =0.69' / \l C v IE (G"PVC sev)= 1.117' / l/r = Proposed Concrete ft r C_ v - Limits of Pavement"Res)ora io /Repair c /s Limits Of Proposed Building a ;+ / V > x / % "v = Proposed Inlet Sedi epti Q I C / SHEET DESCRIPTION: ® 7/14/08 REV. INTERIOR LANDSCAPED AREAS PER C.O.C. DRC PER COMMENTS (7/3/08) x. s �N0' B E LLE VI E W B I LTM 0 R E CABANA CLUB 6/11 /08 REV. BLDG & PARKING LAYOUT, STORM SYSTEM LAYOUT, CONNECT TO COUNTY . ` ', b 77,25A 25A y 2 RD; REMOVE WESTERN EMERGENCY OVERFLOW PER C.O.C. DRC COMMENTS 000 • �. F.Bra•PG. C -4 'a SITE PLAN (5/11/08); ADDED SEAWALL CAP NOTE S sHr. 1 4/8/08 ADDED FIFE AND FIFE NOTE, ADDED TREES WITHIN 25' OF BOUNDARY 1 PAVING, GRADING & DRAINAGE PLAN PER CITY OF CLEARWATER COMMENTS DATE CL NO. DATE REVISIONS ABY'D 1/31/08 OF 11 C.) zi O 1. SITE DESCRIPTION A. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: THE APPLICANT PROPOSES TO CONSTRUCT A NEW 38 UNIT HOTEL LOCATED IN THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA. CONSTRUCTION WILL CONSIST OF CLEARING, GRUBBING, EARTHWORK, INSTALLATION OF THE INFRASTRUCTURE, BACK FILLING, PAVING AND GRADING. B. MAJOR SOIL DISTURBING ACTIVITIES: SOIL DISTURBING ACTIVITIES FOR THIS PROJECT WILL INCLUDE CLEARING, GRUBBING, EARTHWORK, INSTALLATION OF PAVEMENT, DRAINAGE AND UTILITIES. THE CONTRACTOR WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PROVIDING TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT STABILIZATION AS SOON AS POSSIBLE FOR AREAS OF THE SITE WHERE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES HAVE CEASED, BUT IN NO CASE SHALL THE TIME BE GREATER THAN FOURTEEN (14) CALENDAR DAYS. C. TOTAL PROJECT AREA: 1.38 ACRES THE PROJECT CONSISTS OF THE CONSTRUCTION OF 38 UNIT CONDOMINIUM COMPLEX INCLUDING CLEARING AND GRUBBING, EARTHWORK, DRAINAGE /UTILITY INFRASTRUCTURE AND PAVEMENT. D. TOTAL AREA TO BE DISTURBED: 1.11 ACRES 11 IT SHALL BE THE INTENT OF THE CONTRACTOR TO MINIMIZE THE ACREAGES OF DISTURBED SOIL IN THE PROJECTAREAATALL TIMES. E. (1) RUNOFF COEFFICIENTS BEFORE CW(B), DURING CW(D) AND AFTER CW(A) CONSTRUCTION: RUNOFF COEFFICIENT FOR: OPEN SPACE: C = 0.2 IMPERVIOUS SURFACES: C = 0.95 DISTURBED AREAS, EXPOSED SOIL ETC. DURING CONST.: C = 0.8 WEIGHTED RUNOFF COEFFICIENT: CW(B): 0.62 CW(D): 0.68A CW(A): 0.66 DESCRIPTION OF SOIL OR QUALITY OF DISCHARGE THE PINELLAS COUNTY SOIL SURVEY IDENTIFIES THE SURROUNDING SOILS AS: ARENTS - URBAN LAND COMPLEX - 0% TO 5% SLOPES - 7.0% BEACHES-30% 2. CONTROLS NARRATIVE - SEQUENCE OF SOIL DISTURBING ACTIVITIES AND IMPLEMENTATION OF CONTROLS: CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES GENERAL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES ON THIS PROJECT CONSIST OF CLEARING, GRUBBING, EARTHWORK, INSTALLATION OF THE INFRASTRUCTURE, BACK FILLING AND GRADING. ALL ITEMS REPRESENTED IN THE FOLLOWING DISCUSSION ARE TREATED IN DETAIL IN THE CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS AND PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS, "FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR ROAD AND BRIDGE CONSTRUCTION ", OR WILL BE IMPLEMENTED BY THE CONTRACTOR'S REPRESENTATIVE IN A MANNER APPROPRIATE TO ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVE CONSTRUCTION PRACTICES AND AS APPROVED BY THE OWNER. THE CONTRACTOR WILL BE REQUIRED TO PREPARE A SITE SPECIFIC EROSION CONTROL PLAN. THE CONTRACTOR WILL ALSO BE REQUIRED TO MODIFY THE PLAN OR MATERIALS DURING CONSTRUCTION TO ADAPT TO SEASONAL VARIATIONS. OFF -SITE RUNOFF SHOULD BE DIVERTED AWAY OR THROUGH THE CONSTRUCTION AREA. THIS ADDITIONAL FLOW IF NOT DIVERTED, CAN ADD VOLUME AND SIZE TO STRUCTURAL PRACTICES, REQUIRING MORE FREQUENT MAINTENANCE AND LIMITING EFFECTIVENESS OF EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROLS. COMPLIANCE WITH THE STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN IS A REQUIREMENT OF THE PROJECT CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. CONSTRUCTION - RELATED INFORMATION REQUIRED BY THE NPDES PERMIT BUT NOT SPECIFICALLY INDICATED IN THE STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN CAN BE FOUND IN THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. THE CONTRACTOR WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PROVIDING A STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE FOR VEHICLES ENTERING OR EXITING ONTO PUBLIC ROADS. THE CONTRACTOR'S REPRESENTATIVE SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR W.)NITORING THE SYSTEM AND MODIFYING THE SYSTEM OR PROCEDURES AS NEEDED. CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE A DETAILED CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE T 0 INDICATE DATES OF MAJOR GRADING ACTIVITIES AND DETERMINE SEQUENCING OF TEMPORARY AND PERMANENT SOIL DISTURBING ACTIVITIES ON ALL PORTIONS OF THE SITE. PRIOR TO THE BEGINNING OF ANY PHASE, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL ITEMS AS DESCRIBED ON SHEETS 2, 4 AND 5 IN THE CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR PROVIDING SEEDING, MULCHING AND WATER AS SOON AS POSSIBLE FOR AREAS OF THE SITE WHERE CONSTRUCTION HAS TEMPORARILY CEASED BUT IN NO CASE SHALL THE TIME BE GREATER THAN FOURTEEN (14) DAYS. INSTALLATION OF THE INFRASTRUCTURE AND EARTHWORK, AS SHOWN ON THE PLANS MAY REQUIRE DEWATERING PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR DISCHARGING THE DEWATERING FLOW TO A TEMPORARY SETTLINGS BASIN SUCH AS AREAS CREATED BY STAKED HAY BALES OR SILT FENCE IN DRY GRASSED SWALES OR OTHER SIMILAR SETTLING AREAS, HOWEVER, AT NO TIME SHALL THE CONTRACTOR DISCHARGE DEWATERING FLOW DIRECTLY TO WETLAND AREAS. EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROLS SHALL BE MAINTAINED THROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTION AND MAY BE REMOVED ONLY WHEN PERMANENT STABILIZATION IS ESTABLISHED AND THE OWNER APPROVES THE REMOVAL. A. EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROLS: (1) STABILIZATION PRACTICES TO BE IMPLEMENTED: STABILIZATION MEASURES SHALL BE INITIATED AS SOON AS PRACTICABLE IN PORTIONS OF THE SITE WHERE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES HAVE TEMPORARILY OR PERMANENTLY CEASED, BUT IN NO CASE SHALL THE TIME BE GREATER THAN FOURTEEN (14) DAYS AFTER THE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY HAS TEMPORARILY OR PERMANENTLY CEASED. ALL DISTURBED AREAS WILL BE SEEDED AND MULCHED OR SODDED FOLLOWING CONSTRUCTION. I CERTIFY UNDER PENALTY OF LAW THAT THIS DOCUMENT AND ALL ATTACHMENTS WERE PREPARED UNDER MY DIRECTION OR SUPERVISION IN ACCORDANCE WITH A SYSTEM DESIGNED TO ASSURE THAT QUALIFIED PERSONNEL PROPERLY GATHERED AND EVALUATED THE INFORMATION SUBMITTED. BASED ON MY INQUIRY OF THE PERSON OR PERSONS WHO MANAGE THE SYSTEM, OR THOSE PERSONS DIRECTLY RESPONSIBLE FOR GATHERING THE INFORMATION, THE INFORMATION SUBMITTED IS, TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF, TRUE, ACCURATE, AND COMPLETE. I AM AWARE THAT THERE ARE SIGNIFICANT PENALTIES FOR SUBMITTING FALSE INFORMATION, INCLUDING THE POSSIBILITY OF FINE AND IMPRISONMENT FOR KNOWING VIOLATIONS. E 0 r NAME (OPERATOR AND /OR RESPONSIBLE AUTHORITY) DATE E 00 12 M 00 0 0 N C 7 U M to C � DESIGNED THE SIGNATURE OF THE QUALITY CONTROL OFFICER IN THIS SPACE in E JD INDICATES THAT ALL REOUIRED DRAWN PERMITS HAVE BEEN OBTAINED o RD /JEB AND THAT CONSTRUCTION IS C, CHECKED AUTHORIZED TO COMMENCE. oC O.C. i Y (2) STRUCTURAL PRACTICES WILL INCLUDE: ROCK BEDDING AT CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE STAKED SILT FENCES INLET SEDIMENT TRAPS B. OTHER CONTROLS: (1) WASTE DISPOSAL: THE CONTRACTOR WILL PROVIDE LITTER CONTROL AND COLLECTION WITHIN THE PROJECT BOUNDARIES DURING CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES. ALL FERTILIZER, HYDROCARBON, OR OTHER CHEMICAL CONTAINERS SHALL BE DISPOSED OF BY THE CONTRACTOR ACCORDING TO EPA'S STANDARD PRACTICES AS DETAILED BY THE MANUFACTURER. NO SOLID MATERIALS INCLUDING BUILDING AND CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS SHALL BE DISCHARGED TO WETLANDS OR BURIED ON -SITE. (2) OFF -SITE VEHICLE TRACKING: OFF -SITE VEHICLE TRACKING WILL BE CONTROLLED BY THE FOLLOWING METHODS: LOADED HAUL TRUCKS TO BE COVERED WITH TARPAULIN. EXCESS DIRT ON ROAD REMOVED DAILY. STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CONSTRUCTING AND MAINTAINING STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCES WHEN ENTERING OR EXITING ONTO PUBLIC ROAD. THE CONTRACTOR'S REPRESENTATIVE SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR MODIFYING THE SYSTEM OR PROCEDURES AS NEEDED AND AS APPROVED BY THE OWNER. (3) SANITARY WASTE: ALL SANITARY WASTE WILL BE COLLECTED FROM PORTABLE UNITS BY A LICENSED SANITARY WASTE MANAGEMENT CONTRACTOR AS REQUIRED BY STATE REGULATION. (4) FERTILIZERS AND PESTICIDES: FERTILIZERS AND SOIL STERILIZERS WILL BE USED ON THIS PROJECT IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS AT THE DISCRETION OF THE CONTRACTOR WITH COORDINATION OF THE OWNER. (5) NON-STORMWATER DISCHARGE (INCLUDING SPILL REPORTING): A. THE CONTRACTOR WILL PROVIDE THE APPLICANT WITH AN EROSION CONTROL PLAN THAT WILL INCLUDE SPILL REPORTING AND RESPONSE. B. APPROVED STATE, LOCAL PLANS, OR STORMWATER PERMITS: - SWFWMD - CITY OF CLEARWATER 3. MAINTENANCE: GENERAL THE CONTRACTOR WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR MAINTENANCE AND REPAIRS OF EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL DEVICES AND REMOVAL OF EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL DEVICES AFTER THE NOTICE OF TERMINATION. MAINTENANCE AND REPAIR REQUIRED FOR THE CONTROL AND ABATEMENT OF EROSION AND WATER POLLUTION SHALL BE INCLUDED IN THE COST OF PAY ITEMS FOR THIS PROJECT. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN RAIN GAUGES ON THE PROJECT SITE AND RECORD WEEKLY RAINFALL. ALL CONTROL MEASURES WILL BE MAINTAINED DAILY BY THE CONTRACTOR. ALL MEASURES WILL BE MAINTAINED IN GOOD WORKING ORDER. IF A REPAIR IS NECESSARY, IT WILL BE INITIATED WITHIN 24 HOURS OF REPORT. STRUCTURAL PRACTICES AND CONTROLS: THE FOLLOWING PRACTICES WILL BE USED TO MAINTAIN EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROLS: BUILT -UP SEDIMENT WILL BE REMOVED FROM SILT FENCE WHEN IT HAS REACHED ONE-THIRD THE HEIGHT 0 THE FENCE. TEMPORARY AND PERMANENT SEEDING AND PLANTING WILL BE INSPECTED FOR BARE SPOTS, WASHOUTS, AND HEALTHY GROWTH. STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCES SHALL BE MAINTAINED TO PREVENT CLOGGING OF ROCK BEDDING WHICH MAY IMPEDE THE USEFULNESS OF THE STRUCTURE. 4. INSPECTION: THE CONTRACTOR'S DAILY INSPECTIONS REQUIRED FOR THE CONTROL AND ABATEMENT OF EROSION AND WATER POLLUTION SHALL BE INCLUDED IN THE COST OF THE PAY ITEMS FOR THIS PROJECT. ALL EROSION AND WATER POLLUTION ABATEMENT AND CONTROL MEASURES WILL BE INSPECTED DAILY BY THE CONTRACTOR. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL USE THE STANDARD CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION REPORT FORM FOR DAILY INSPECTIONS. 5. TRACKING AND REPORTING: THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT A WEEKLY REPORT TO THE APPLICANT DOCUMENTING THE DAILY INSPECTIONS AND MAINTENANCE OR REPAIRS TO THE EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL DEVICES. THE PERMITTEE OR ITS REPRESENTATIVES SHALL MAINTAIN ALL REQUIRED RECORDS SUBMITTED BY THE CONTRACTOR AND COMPLETE ALL CSWMP INSPECTION REPORT FORMS REQUIRED FOR THE NPDES PERMIT. PREPARATION OF THE CONTRACTOR'S WEEKLY REPORTS OF INSPECTIONS, MAINTENANCE AND REPAIRS, REQUIRED FOR THE CONTROL AND ABATEMENT OF EROSION AND WATER POLLUTION, SHALL BE INCLUDED IN THE COST OF THE PAY ITEMS FOR THIS PROJECT. NAME TITLE COMPANY NAME, ADDRESS AND PHONE NUMBER DATE _ a z •., I CERTIFY UNDER PENALTY OF LAW THAT I UNDERSTAND, AND SHALL COMPLY WITH, THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA GENERIC PERMIT FOR STORMWATER DISCHARGE FROM LARGE AND SMALL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES AND THIS STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN PREPARED THEREUNDER. NPDES CONTRACTOR AND SUBCONTRACTOR CERTIFICATION TO BE COMPLETED AFTER CONTRACTORS HAVE BEEN SELECTED. PREPARED FOR, FLORIDA BSI C® SUL 1"J I I�! INC. ENGINEERS, ENVIRONMENTALISTS, SURVEYORS 8 PLANNERS 3030 Starkey Blvd, New Port Richey FL 34655 Tel: (727) 849 -7588 - Fax: (727) 848 -3648 E.B. No. 7421 R.J. HEISENBOTTLE ARCHITECTS, P.A. 2199 PONCE DE LEON BOULEVARD, SUITE 400 CORAL GABLES, FLORIDA 33134 PHONE: (305) 446 -7799 FAX: (305) 446 -9275 SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT CERTIFICATION CONSTRUCTION SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN ( CSWMP) 1. THE CSWMP CONSISTS OF PLAN SHEETS C-2, C -4 AND C -5 SHOWING EROSION PROTECTION DEVICES TO BE UTILIZED ON THE PROJECT. 2. THE APPLICANT /OWNER OR AUTHORIZED AGENT HAS REVIEWED THE CSWMP AND HAS SIGNED THE CSWMP WHERE REQUIRED BELOW. 3. THE CSWMP SHALL BE PART OF THE FINAL CONSTRUCTION PLANS FOR THE PERMITTED SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM. SIGNATURE: NAME: DATE: APPLICANT OWNER AUTHORIZED AGENT (SITE CONTRACTOR) ❑ ❑ ❑ SILT 1:1 MAX. FENCE 28-1 SLOPE EOXC AVATE) TYPE III STORM DRAIN — I I ev� i — TOE FABRIC IN STRUCTURE SECTION 6" MINIMUM 1 6' MINIMUM I IO 2 "x4" CROSSBRACE x x STORM DRAIN -STRUCTURE 6' MININ UM x " PLAN POST INSTALLATION: x x TYPE III SILT FENCE SUPPORTED BY STEEL POST SHALL BE USED. THE STAKES SHALL BE SPACED EVENLY AROUND THE PERIMETER OF THE INLET A MAXIMUM OF 3 FEET APART, AND SECURELY DRIVEN INTO THE GROUND, APPROXIMATELY 18 INCHES DEEP. THE FABRIC SHALL BE ENTRENCHED 12 INCHES AND BACKFILLED WITH CRUSHED STONE OR COMPACTED SOIL, FABRIC AND WIRE SHALL BE SECURELY FASTENED TO THE POST, AND FABRIC ENDS MUST BE OVERLAPPED A MINIMUM OF 18 INCHES OR WRAPPED TOGETHER AROUND A POST TO PROVIDE A CONTINUOUS FABRIC BARRIER AROUND THE INLET. MAINTENANCE: THE TRAP SHALL BE INSPECTED DAILY AND AFTER EACH RAIN AND REPAIRS MADE AS NEEDED, SEDIMENT SHALL BE REMOVED WHEN THE SEDIMENT HAS ACCUMULATED TO ONE –HALF THE HEIGHT OF THE TRAP. SEDIMENT SHALL NOT BE WASHED INTO THE INLET. IT SHALL BE REMOVED FROM THE SEDIMENT TRAP AND DISPOSED OF AND STABILIZED SO THAT IT WILL NOT ENTER THE INLET, AGAIN. INLET SEDIMENT TRAP FILTER FABRIC WITH SUPPORTING FRAME N.T.S. �SOD---� � SOD� SOD-�� -u3i SOD ENDWALLS SOD DETAIL AT STRUCTURES GENERAL SODDING NOTES S��F POpO UG�`'S P � ADD STONE BERM SPEED Mlolnrr 6" MINIMUM S/ / p -PLAN BUMP TO SHAKE OFF EXCESS USE FDOT _1 DIRT ON TRUCKS # 357 ROCK GEOTEXTILE UNDERLINER TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION ACCESS N.T.S. (SEE SHEET 6) 16" ASPHAL71C CCOORNCREX BASE TRENCH FOR SOO (AM DEPTH 1.3-) VALLEY CURB NOTES: 1. SPECIAL ATTENTION IS TO BE GIVEN TO THE PLACEMENT OF SOD NEXT TO THE ROADWAY. TOP OF SOD SHALL MATCH EDGE OF VALLEY CURB. SOD DETAIL AT PA VT EDGE –See F,D.O.T, Index No's. 100, 105, 272, 273, 281, and Hernando Country standards for additional details. –All disturbed areas of on existing public right of way shall receive sodding. –All new roadways shall receive sodding, 16" wide along the valley curb edges as a minimum. –All drainage structures shall receive sodding per the above as a minimum. –All slopes 4:1 OR steeper shall receive sodding. –All sod on slopes equal to or steeper than 4 to 1 shall be pegged or mot secured as necessary to prevent displacement unless directed by the County. –All other disturbed areas NOT receiving sod shall be properly seeded and mulched. – Sodding shall include all work, fertilizers, and watering necessary to produce a dense, live stand of grass. – Sodding will be considered acceptable if 80% of the installation is healthy at the beginning and end of the 18 month maintenance period, SODDING DETAIL N TS 0 OPTIONAL POST POSITIONS –j `– 20' ± PRINCIPAL POST POSITION <I � — (CANTED 20° TOWARD FLOW) POST (OPTIONS: 2"x 4" OR 2 1/2" MIN. DIA. WOOD: STEEL 1.33 LBS /FT w 0 0 - 00 0 N Z 00 SECTION 6' MAX. FILTER FABRIC "LOW a, a � d ELEVATION TYPE III SILT FENCE D.O.T. INDEX #102 N.T.S. MAINTENANCE OF SILT SCREENS: SILT SCREENS SHALL BE INSPECTED BY THE CONTRACTOR AFTER EACH RAINFALL EVENT FOR SIGNS OF DETERIORATION OR FAILURE. DETERIORATION OF A SILT SCREEN SHALL BE CONSTRUED TO MEAN THAT THE SILT SCREEN HAS LIMITED EFFECTIVENESS OR CAPACITY FOR THE FUNCTION OF TRAPPING SEDIMENT, DUE TO PROBLEMS SUCH AS, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, EXCESSIVE BUILDUP OF SEDIMENT OR CONSTRUCTION ACCIDENT, WHEN A SILT SCREEN BECOMES DETERIORATED, IT SHALL BE IMMEDIATELY REMEDIED BY THE CONTRACTOR BY SUCH MEANS AS REMOVAL OF THE EXCESSIVE BUILDUP OF SILT, STRAIGHTENING AND TIGHTENING OF THE SCREEN, OR ANY OTHER SUCH MEASURE DEEMED NECESSARY. FAILURE OF A SILT SCREEN SHALL BE CONSTRUED TO MEAN THAT THE SILT SCREEN IS NO LONGER CAPABLE OF FUNCTIONING TO TRAP SEDIMENT DUE TO A RIP, TEAR, OVERTOPPING BY SEDIMENT, BIODEGRADATION, CONSTRUCTION ACCIDENT, OR ANY OTHER SUCH MEANS. WHEN A SILT SCREEN HAS FAILED, IT SHALL BE IMMEDIATELY REPLACED WITH NEW SILT SCREEN BY THE CONTRACTOR WITHIN THE LIMITS OF FAILURE. PREVENTATIVE MAINTENANCE OF THE SLIT SCREEN SHALL BE ACCOMPLISHED BY WEEKLY INSPECTION FOR SIGNS OF DETERIORATION OR FAILURE DURING PERIODS OF NO RAINFALL EVENT. SHEET DESCRIPTION, BELLEVIEW BILTMORE CABANA CLUB SITE PLAN STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN (SWPP) AND CSWMP FILTER FABRIC (IN CONFORMANCE WITH SEC. 985 FDOT SPEC.) ,(tiPrAl � 0 JOB NO. "= 2007 -25A f !` °• r t EPN 263 F.B. B PG. 11\ 6/11/08 1 REV. AREA TO BE DISTURBED & RUNOFF COEFF. DURING CONST. PER C.O.C. DRC COMMENTS (5/1/08) DATE, NO. DATE REVISIONS A BY PP'D 1/31 c 0 E a`) c- C: 0 s U 7 0 [L 0 0 En 0 C T 0 E o. a� U C 0 U C 0 rn c .3 0 0 U c c 0 I- 0 -o 0 E C-5 ° cO O SHT. N 0 s .a 11 OF CJ r•• A. _ a z •., .1 - ,(tiPrAl � 0 JOB NO. "= 2007 -25A f !` °• r t EPN 263 F.B. B PG. 11\ 6/11/08 1 REV. AREA TO BE DISTURBED & RUNOFF COEFF. DURING CONST. PER C.O.C. DRC COMMENTS (5/1/08) DATE, NO. DATE REVISIONS A BY PP'D 1/31 c 0 E a`) c- C: 0 s U 7 0 [L 0 0 En 0 C T 0 E o. a� U C 0 U C 0 rn c .3 0 0 U c c 0 I- 0 -o 0 E C-5 ° cO O SHT. N 0 s .a 11 OF CJ vo 4. it 4 :a � 4�U v 4b / �G ut CONC SE AWA1 L (20' INDE) SEE DETAIL 2) BURIED vv 22 LF 6" PVC WM EC[_ P)PB 3, PC 14 5/8" WATER METER (IRRIGATION) 6 LF 6" PVC WM "`\ 1" 90' BEND . 2 LF 1" IRRIGATION LINE 4x1 TEE 6" 90' BEND 4" 90' BEND 2 LF 6" / ` 6" 90' BEND PVC WM �� 9 DCVA CE / J) `LF 4" PVC WM 7 8 "x4" REDUCER E 8" SANITARY 8" TEE Q. o / l 11 LF 8" PVC WM co /\� �\ // / EXISTING 10" WATERMAIN I REDUCER DETAIL PVC WM TAP EXISTING 10" WATERMAIN `c 1° = 5' =I A M C DESIGNED THE SIGNATURE OF THE QUALITY CONTROL OFFICER IN THIS SPACE JD INDICATES THAT ALL REQUIRED FLORIDA DESIGN CONSUL TANTS' INC. DRAWN PERMITS HAVE BEEN OBTAINED �7 o RD /JEB AND THAT CONSTRUCTION Is f[1tJt ENGINEERS, ENVIRONMENTALISTS, SURVEYORS 8 PLANNERS Po AUTHORIZED TO COMMENCE. CHECKED 3030 Starkey Blvd, New Port Richey FL 34655 OC Tel: (727) 849 -7588 - Fax: (727) 848 -3648 N Q.C. Y E.B. No. 7421 C7 �' 2 S lV!!JP/ isle - THE TIME OF BUILDING PERMIT APPROVAL. LEGEND - WM -1- = Proposed Water Line, Valve, & Services WM -D9 = Existing Water Line & Valve - S - = Existing Sanitary Sewer Main W�f = Proposed Storm Sewer PREPARED FOR, = Proposed Sanitary Sewer & Services I-e-0 = Proposed Fire Hydrant Assembly �y = Proposed Fire Department Connection = Existing Fire Hydrant = Limits Of Proposed Building R.J. HEISENBOTTLE ARCHITECTS, P.A. 2199 PONCE DE LEON BOULEVARD, SUITE 400 CORAL GABLES, FLORIDA 33134 PHONE: (305) 446 -7799 FAX: (305) 446 -9275 - 34 LF 6" PVC WM 34 LF 4" PVC WM �v .I I' G\ Jam% V �•' 2 �� \r Ca n � • �> ,�.r c; -� - -FIRE HYDRANT ASSEMBLY Q /�- 37 LF 8" PVC WM TAP EXISTING 10" WATERMAIN -SEE DETAIL THIS SHEET Q U� %NNECT TO EXISTING' \ SANITARY SEWER SERVICE CONC VAUL1 (POVYCR) CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY HORIZONT VERTICAL LOCATION OF THE EXIS11 SANITARY SEWER SERVICE PRIOR /f CONSTRUCTION COMMENCEMENT / / r 1 fJr, SHEET DESCRIPTION, BELLEVIEW BILTMORE CABANA CLUB SITE PLAN UTILITY PLAN l / Q �G r 0 10 20 40 LINE TABLE I I _ LINE BEARING - DISTANCE ---- - - - - -- - L1KL,C- - - - -- - ---T -- T- -_ ____ - S20'0014'E ------ - - - - -- - 7.56'_ L2 L, C' 565'00'l 4-" _- 16.00' L3 (L, C) - - S24- 59'46 "W - -- 4.00' 5/8" WATER METER (IRRIGATION) 6 LF 6" PVC WM "`\ 1" 90' BEND . 2 LF 1" IRRIGATION LINE 4x1 TEE 6" 90' BEND 4" 90' BEND 2 LF 6" / ` 6" 90' BEND PVC WM �� 9 DCVA CE / J) `LF 4" PVC WM 7 8 "x4" REDUCER E 8" SANITARY 8" TEE Q. o / l 11 LF 8" PVC WM co /\� �\ // / EXISTING 10" WATERMAIN I REDUCER DETAIL PVC WM TAP EXISTING 10" WATERMAIN `c 1° = 5' =I A M C DESIGNED THE SIGNATURE OF THE QUALITY CONTROL OFFICER IN THIS SPACE JD INDICATES THAT ALL REQUIRED FLORIDA DESIGN CONSUL TANTS' INC. DRAWN PERMITS HAVE BEEN OBTAINED �7 o RD /JEB AND THAT CONSTRUCTION Is f[1tJt ENGINEERS, ENVIRONMENTALISTS, SURVEYORS 8 PLANNERS Po AUTHORIZED TO COMMENCE. CHECKED 3030 Starkey Blvd, New Port Richey FL 34655 OC Tel: (727) 849 -7588 - Fax: (727) 848 -3648 N Q.C. Y E.B. No. 7421 C7 �' 2 S lV!!JP/ isle - THE TIME OF BUILDING PERMIT APPROVAL. LEGEND - WM -1- = Proposed Water Line, Valve, & Services WM -D9 = Existing Water Line & Valve - S - = Existing Sanitary Sewer Main W�f = Proposed Storm Sewer PREPARED FOR, = Proposed Sanitary Sewer & Services I-e-0 = Proposed Fire Hydrant Assembly �y = Proposed Fire Department Connection = Existing Fire Hydrant = Limits Of Proposed Building R.J. HEISENBOTTLE ARCHITECTS, P.A. 2199 PONCE DE LEON BOULEVARD, SUITE 400 CORAL GABLES, FLORIDA 33134 PHONE: (305) 446 -7799 FAX: (305) 446 -9275 - 34 LF 6" PVC WM 34 LF 4" PVC WM �v .I I' G\ Jam% V �•' 2 �� \r Ca n � • �> ,�.r c; -� - -FIRE HYDRANT ASSEMBLY Q /�- 37 LF 8" PVC WM TAP EXISTING 10" WATERMAIN -SEE DETAIL THIS SHEET Q U� %NNECT TO EXISTING' \ SANITARY SEWER SERVICE CONC VAUL1 (POVYCR) CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY HORIZONT VERTICAL LOCATION OF THE EXIS11 SANITARY SEWER SERVICE PRIOR /f CONSTRUCTION COMMENCEMENT / / r 1 fJr, SHEET DESCRIPTION, BELLEVIEW BILTMORE CABANA CLUB SITE PLAN UTILITY PLAN l / Q �G r 0 10 20 40 © NOTE: ALL ELECTRIC AND COMMUNICATION LINES ON -SITE MUST BE PLACED UNDERGROUND. I I •c r' 0 i s i 3 • i 0 © NOTE: ALL ELECTRIC AND COMMUNICATION LINES ON -SITE MUST BE PLACED UNDERGROUND. CONC S/w cry -\ ��\ r��i - - -- - -• - - - - - - -- - - -- I \ \ 1 -- - - -- -- - - -- - / - i" + � I •� I o /`-N MIMI EL= 5.25' / IF (15 "VCP C`iE) =( -)0 73' i IE (8 "VCP / IC (t'i "VCP 4 -_W) -(- )0.70' d IC (f; "'✓(-,P w)= (- -)014' C IE (4 "PVC NW) =090' I Q) I I •c 0 i s 3 0 ._, 0 0 CONC S/w cry -\ ��\ r��i - - -- - -• - - - - - - -- - - -- I \ \ 1 -- - - -- -- - - -- - / - i" + � I •� I o /`-N MIMI EL= 5.25' / IF (15 "VCP C`iE) =( -)0 73' i IE (8 "VCP / IC (t'i "VCP 4 -_W) -(- )0.70' d IC (f; "'✓(-,P w)= (- -)014' C IE (4 "PVC NW) =090' I Q) I I •c 0 s 3 0 ._, 0 0 O o 0 E a a� V C O U C U C 0 � a7 to U • .� at rn 'In + t J0 N ! Op 2007, -25A L O i C- SHT. Il 00 O ° EPN 263 7/14/08 ADD NOTE PER C.O.C. DRC PER COMMENTS (7/3/08) F.B. e PG. 1 6/11 /08 REV. BLDG & PARKING LAYOUT, SAN & WATER LAYOUT, FDC LOCATION; ADDED FHA & IRRIGATION SERVICE PER C.O.C. DRC COMMENTS (5/1/08) DATE. 1/31/08 a ABY'D NO. DATE REVISIONS OF O U LEGEND = Proposed Water Line, Valve, & Service W;,q .. ... -_ ----- .._ - -- - -- __.- _ -- = Existing Water Main = Proposed Fire Hydrant yo = Proposed Fire Dept. Connection (FDC) = Existing Hydrant Assembly p— Proposed Building Footprint Proposed 450' Fire Department Access Path `tit T r yY O,' iCl EXISTING BUILDING OV� / 46 V J QA 1!rUDtp EXISTING FIRE= HYDRANT #06 —� EXISTING BUILDING 1 © �' 1 � � - FIR E TRUCK K TURN IN i i - MOVEMENT EN / n T � i "r 1 l � r l S r Cry, y) `Sl 14' , M e tl s= •J �i 1 \\ J Q / W t , 1 1 i J , 1 't • 1 •i� I - V 1 5. O _. PROPOSED �. I O ED F RE 6 O f o. HYDRANT r 6 • T O �j( 1 P 't' O G• O• p 4 f J M / 5 t 1 y -•f" , 'ic �t 7 �t 1 6 I+ Q �' C T P \1 N b� x„ A - t a� W 7 �. , c x v' o 0 19 9 _ - p 1 � / i Yte asu xz� tatuv 'O. . r �b 9 / /3 i'J , / F 0 7 7� �I c-� o � 0 t.,• � �a n,1 V r;. / V �•i v h Y i�r i i j' h / D 0. w O w - o .i �I - o AD N ti "I. y�. f' I. A <7 / f o iF\Yn �t •J, :J C1 •t7 R •t� �l V •a / n I� a. i r� - P N ''�•� r a 1 VERTICA L CLEARANCE r I A T PORTE COCHERE L - %l � •Y �D C `tr l r / :z � J 3 / J xir - C JJ ^7 �t LI' - 1 I L � .may'• V t V� " _ :.,.. . - PROPOSED FIRE I, 'rl . .F 5.1•: S ,I O HYDRANT - e L r.•l -r 1 X51 1 Q i� J U VC f ,i +A ,r ,:. f ^' i� 1 ENT FIR E DEPARTMENT o r � f iy'•' r' 7 • L is L ti.. — - - — CONNECTION (FDC) o. r " R 1 . ".ifi_X9•G`3h'3 �i:IP;� E.S.LS„akL"a`[: t.,;,F:� C!'. S:^:�,�'t:l',;2: IFa ^JaSllSi:f.'v ?9 [ ?:'7:�::^x.'L•z9.7� +.'L�,^ry:, iiy D / \ \ \ / Q , L'� t t•- 1 F _Q, -O 13' t @13" 12' d ` - �.. _ �_ _ -� % ; ` / , .-:.� !" .-. �' 1 q" t ,. �,. / �1 dl \` / dQ �' ,; / / 17 1 I ^ , / i �'OJ Py ,I\ „/ F�4A �\2.. PM ` - ti ,3 450 F(RE � D�PA��MFNT A�CES�� I�A,._I�_ ,� _ � _ ® \ _� \ � �� f 13” �lowl \� 11" � IG' i 13" Q / s pAl N 9 U 0 h 0 E `�• o E FDC NOTE: Q. M EACH FDC WILL HAVE A SIGN THAT STATES "NO PARKING FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTION ". THE SIGN MUST MEET THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (FDOT) STANDARDS. NOTE: THE FDOT HAS ADOPTED. THE FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATIONS (GHWA) MANUAL ON UNIFORM 00 TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES (MUTCD). CLEARANCE OF 7.5' TO THE FRONT, SIDES AND REAR OF FDC ARE REQUIRED TO BE MAINTAINED. / O / C N N C / O EXISTING FIRE / �y•rII HYDRANT #08 3 K y 4) � MI COQ a • THE SIGNATURE OF THE QUALITY ,�• •, „- , , JOB' NO. O DESIGNED PREPARED FORS SHEET DESCRIPTION: 2007 -25A o CONTROL OFFICER IN THIS SPACE a E JD INDICATES THAT ALL REOUIRED BELLEVIEW BILTMORE CABANA CLUB EPN ® I � SIGN (;® �(f�']"��?"�� INC. R.J. HEISENBOTTLE ARCHITECTS P A 263 C_7 DRAWN PERMITS HAVE BEEN OBTAINED f a RD /JEB AND THAT CONSTRUCTION IS ENGINEERS, ENVIRONMENTALISTS SURVEYORS 8 PLANNERS 2199 PONCE DE LEON BOULEVARD SUITE 400 F.B. S PG. N C, CHECKED AUTHORIZED TO COMMENCE. ' SITE PLAN srlT. 3030 Starkey Blvd, New Port Richey FL 34655 CORAL GABLES, FLORIDA 33134 1 6/11/08 REV. BLDG & PARKING LAYOUT, FDC LOCATION; ADDED FHA; RELOCATED FIRE a. oc Tel: (727) 849 -7588 - Fax: (727) 848 -3648 PHONE: (305) 446 -7799 FAX: (305) 446 -9275 FIRE ACCESS PLAN TRUCK TURNING MOVEMENT PER C.O.C. DRC COMMENTS (5/1/08) DATE, `nT O.C. j APP'D 1 /31 /08 1 Y E.B. N0. 7421 NO. DATE REVISIONS BY OF O U N 0 10 20 40 OV� / 46 V J QA 1!rUDtp EXISTING FIRE= HYDRANT #06 —� EXISTING BUILDING 1 © �' 1 � � - FIR E TRUCK K TURN IN i i - MOVEMENT EN / n T � i "r 1 l � r l S r Cry, y) `Sl 14' , M e tl s= •J �i 1 \\ J Q / W t , 1 1 i J , 1 't • 1 •i� I - V 1 5. O _. PROPOSED �. I O ED F RE 6 O f o. HYDRANT r 6 • T O �j( 1 P 't' O G• O• p 4 f J M / 5 t 1 y -•f" , 'ic �t 7 �t 1 6 I+ Q �' C T P \1 N b� x„ A - t a� W 7 �. , c x v' o 0 19 9 _ - p 1 � / i Yte asu xz� tatuv 'O. . r �b 9 / /3 i'J , / F 0 7 7� �I c-� o � 0 t.,• � �a n,1 V r;. / V �•i v h Y i�r i i j' h / D 0. w O w - o .i �I - o AD N ti "I. y�. f' I. A <7 / f o iF\Yn �t •J, :J C1 •t7 R •t� �l V •a / n I� a. i r� - P N ''�•� r a 1 VERTICA L CLEARANCE r I A T PORTE COCHERE L - %l � •Y �D C `tr l r / :z � J 3 / J xir - C JJ ^7 �t LI' - 1 I L � .may'• V t V� " _ :.,.. . - PROPOSED FIRE I, 'rl . .F 5.1•: S ,I O HYDRANT - e L r.•l -r 1 X51 1 Q i� J U VC f ,i +A ,r ,:. f ^' i� 1 ENT FIR E DEPARTMENT o r � f iy'•' r' 7 • L is L ti.. — - - — CONNECTION (FDC) o. r " R 1 . ".ifi_X9•G`3h'3 �i:IP;� E.S.LS„akL"a`[: t.,;,F:� C!'. S:^:�,�'t:l',;2: IFa ^JaSllSi:f.'v ?9 [ ?:'7:�::^x.'L•z9.7� +.'L�,^ry:, iiy D / \ \ \ / Q , L'� t t•- 1 F _Q, -O 13' t @13" 12' d ` - �.. _ �_ _ -� % ; ` / , .-:.� !" .-. �' 1 q" t ,. �,. / �1 dl \` / dQ �' ,; / / 17 1 I ^ , / i �'OJ Py ,I\ „/ F�4A �\2.. PM ` - ti ,3 450 F(RE � D�PA��MFNT A�CES�� I�A,._I�_ ,� _ � _ ® \ _� \ � �� f 13” �lowl \� 11" � IG' i 13" Q / s pAl N 9 U 0 h 0 E `�• o E FDC NOTE: Q. M EACH FDC WILL HAVE A SIGN THAT STATES "NO PARKING FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTION ". THE SIGN MUST MEET THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (FDOT) STANDARDS. NOTE: THE FDOT HAS ADOPTED. THE FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATIONS (GHWA) MANUAL ON UNIFORM 00 TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES (MUTCD). CLEARANCE OF 7.5' TO THE FRONT, SIDES AND REAR OF FDC ARE REQUIRED TO BE MAINTAINED. / O / C N N C / O EXISTING FIRE / �y•rII HYDRANT #08 3 K y 4) � MI COQ a • THE SIGNATURE OF THE QUALITY ,�• •, „- , , JOB' NO. O DESIGNED PREPARED FORS SHEET DESCRIPTION: 2007 -25A o CONTROL OFFICER IN THIS SPACE a E JD INDICATES THAT ALL REOUIRED BELLEVIEW BILTMORE CABANA CLUB EPN ® I � SIGN (;® �(f�']"��?"�� INC. R.J. HEISENBOTTLE ARCHITECTS P A 263 C_7 DRAWN PERMITS HAVE BEEN OBTAINED f a RD /JEB AND THAT CONSTRUCTION IS ENGINEERS, ENVIRONMENTALISTS SURVEYORS 8 PLANNERS 2199 PONCE DE LEON BOULEVARD SUITE 400 F.B. S PG. N C, CHECKED AUTHORIZED TO COMMENCE. ' SITE PLAN srlT. 3030 Starkey Blvd, New Port Richey FL 34655 CORAL GABLES, FLORIDA 33134 1 6/11/08 REV. BLDG & PARKING LAYOUT, FDC LOCATION; ADDED FHA; RELOCATED FIRE a. oc Tel: (727) 849 -7588 - Fax: (727) 848 -3648 PHONE: (305) 446 -7799 FAX: (305) 446 -9275 FIRE ACCESS PLAN TRUCK TURNING MOVEMENT PER C.O.C. DRC COMMENTS (5/1/08) DATE, `nT O.C. j APP'D 1 /31 /08 1 Y E.B. N0. 7421 NO. DATE REVISIONS BY OF O U 5 �h. Res; ti R1in• de1.1 cLa Ater;Ql St. � coyc St Qua'° �c• +�' s � i r, s� F 7� If "x" is less than 48" then the slope of the flared side shall not exceed 12:1. ISOMETRIC VIEW CURB DROP CURB TRANSITION CURB TRANSITION AAr.►c nF Slr)F1 ELEVATION A -A NOTES: 1. Ramps are designed to the Uniform Federal Accessibility Standards to comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act. 2. Ramps Shall Have a Tactile Surface, Textured to a Depth Not Exceeding 1/8" by use of Tamp or roller In Conformance with Requirements of FDOT Roadway and Traffic Design Standards, Detail 304 Or Most Recent Modifications. so' tite< CO OJe�e�y Moos 1 dew 3' Tranatt►on Side . eaeRe Iuirie VeJ9r �1 A a A Back of Curb PLAN VIEW Match Existing if CONK. SIDEWALK Grass Planting or Other Existing Sidewalk Non - Walking Surface Grass Planting or Other Non - Walking Surface 41/5' 6" 6' 6' Vertical Curb RAMP CURB in Transition I?- Exist. Type I Curb Remove Back of Curb Flow Line if Existing RETURNED CURB RAMPS VALLEY GUTTER CURB CONC. RAMP Textured Surface e A y • 4" 12:1 MAX. SECTION B -B CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA PUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATION ENGINEERING REDRAWN BY DATE Typical Half Section For Low I Typical Half Section For Volume /Residential Connections w y Higher Volume Connections t Side Rd. Or St. I Width (See Sheet!) I 1 I 51 RAW Line W I I End Cont. Point Of Cannedlon As Shown On The Plan Or As Dot•rminod By The Engineer During Shoulder Constrtmtlon Or As Stipulated By Permit. 0 5'Mln. For Private Conneollan 8•p • Limits of Clearing and Grubeing LOW VOLUME 6'Mln. For Publro Ronda Me Asphalt I \ I I Drainage Pipe' Dim /+'a p,. �e Base Uerlta, Aspho/t Baas To Edge Of Paul. T T T TS°d T TT777 Limns or Stabilization I All other Bases 4" Outside Edge of f art. De/em/ned er The Engineer f 1 $ All Bases To Apron Of Curb & Gutter Roodwoy Dltah I - 11 �Roo&W Ditch- _� I I And To Toe Of Curb II $ RAW Llne - R��4 ne 30'From Edge Of R Same As ggoosno I ® - - -" - - • Or R/W Uns, WhWev Less I Shoulder Llmlt of Stabllizaflon � I 5' Min. For Private Connections Shoulder 4" - - �Q® V 6, Mtn. Far Public Roods 111,1 ! I 1 ! 111 For All 800S ShouMer Line '�1, + smoulder Line WITHOUT CURB & GUTTER I WITH CURB & GUTTER Edge Of Pdv4. >Z Eoge of Pa�/f E P %/eat 51 Povemeal AT Oledad Cannectlans - - - - - - - SMALL/MEDIUM In Aoawda,oe With index No. 516 COMMERCIAL Or As Sham In The Plans Or D- or month Exist. Stowlizing (e• Min. J As Stipulated By Permit. 0 Varies Varies- Determined By Drive WldthAnd Anole Varies LIMITS OF CLEARING & GRUBBING, PLAN STABILIZING AND BASE AT INTERSECTIONS al I Shoulder. Sod -See Index 9J Seems its Width !Vales) Shoulder I 1+ 4 5th Dro/repe Plpe1f / +�S4Y F.L. Rdwy. Ditch FL Mitered End Sedfan Miter& Index No. 273 (See O Varlee- Defemtned By Slooe Intel LONGITUDINAL SECTION Roo&W Shoulder. Turnout Taper Or Turnout Auxiliary Lanes Povt Sae She 1 4/14/95 ometrlc vkw redrawn Pyyp TYPICAL SIDEWALK 1 93 1 1/95 Added note CHECKED BY CURB CUT RAMPS INDEX NO. ExistllIgOrProposed Drive oESTT -C- BY PHYSICALLY HANDICAPPED 109 _ REV. DATE DESCRIPTION APP. C.M.H. 2 OF 3 Point Of Connection 0 I Remove Curb if Existin PROFILE AND END VIEW Exist Conc Drive Drainage pipe size and length shall be that shown on the plan, or as stipulated tty permit. or. as determined by the Engineer ollring construction. The size shall be at teat that established by Me FDOT District, but not less than 15" diameter or ew/volent. „ " For alnimum cover over drolmge pipe see Index No. 805. Pipe arch or elllptloal pipe may be required to obtain necessary cover. Max Slope ��1" 1" 1�_ Max Slope Atml nlmal oover applications a modified pavementapron Ispermllfed. See 'PERMISSIBLE PAVEMENT MONFICATiONlindexNo.93. l For spaoing between o0 oent pipe and treatments see Index Na. 93. ; ; •R ;:�• ,� •, , .: ,• ;A Stable material may be rewired for grodad furnouts fa prlvote property as directed by the Engineer In aowi*we with Section •ti+ 4" ® A02 -6 Of the Standard SpeottiarJ►olla. „ 1 /2" Exp. Joint , 1 /2 Exp. Joint 6n 0 The 5 pavement at graded conneafians Is not required where there Is paved shoulder 4 or more In width. The 5'paement requirement may be wnNed for connections serving one or two lames or field entrances with leas than 20 }rips per day, MATERIAL TYPES AND THICKNESSES IN DRIVING AREAS FOR RURAL AND URBAN CONNECTIONS Thickness (In.) Course Materials ® Connections 0 Rgadway® Structural Asphaltic Concrete 11 1 " Bases Optional Base (See index No. 514) O.B.G. i O.B.G. 3 (D Minimum thlam"s. ® All materials shall be approved by the Department prior to being placed. ® Connection structure other than troffio }area. See Notes land 2 below. ® Travel way flares (bypass /ones), auxiliary ranee serving more than d single connection, and all med/on aossavers Including their ouxlllary Janes and /or transition fopere. See Noise /and 2 below. NOTES 1. Thor pavement should be sinahuroly adequate to meet the expected troPflo /oafs and ahould not be leas than that shown above, except as gaproved by tie Department for graded connections. Other Department gapraed pavement eWAV/snoes mqy be used at the discretion of the Engineer. For additional Information see Index No. 514. 2 Auxillary lanes and Their franaltron fapers shall be the acme structure as the abuitn , rodd wcy pavement or any of the stnvAires tabulated above, whichever Is thicker. J. If an asphalt base course is used for a turnout, Its th/okneaa may be Moreased to match the edge of roaowvy pavement In lieu of a separate structural course. 6" of Portland cement concrete will be acceptable In lieu of the actpfaalt base and stnA*mlcouraes. See Notes 4 and 5 below. 4. A structural course Is required for flexible pavements when they are used for auxiliary Ames aervft more Than a aingle connection. S. C aneoflans paved with Portland cement concrete shall be Class X concrete of least 6" thick. The Department may require greater thickness when called for In the plans or alipulaled by permit. Materials and oonatruction are to oonform with FDOT Standard Speorflootions Sections 346, 350 and 522. 6. The Department may require other pavement criteria where loom oondltims warrant. TYPICAL DRIVEWAY CROSS SECTION ors trips par hour as approved bypemitorbyMe Engineer, or when not Itemized in the plans. PAVEMENT STRUCTURE FOR TURNOUTS AND AUXILIARY LANES Paved hlrrads are to be amstruated for allpoved connecting facilities. The connecting point wUlbs determined by the Engineer. TABLE 515-1 Paved lurnaufs are to be owhWed for all bminess, commercial, Indutrial or high volume residential graded oomedIng facilities. The amnecflrp point shall be 3a from edge of rav&V pavement or at RAW line, whichever Ia less. Paved furnouts are to be constructed for all connecting fooNrfles over 4000 vehicles per day. The connecting point shall be at the R/W line. 0 See *Summary Of Geometrlo Requirements For Turnouts" chart for return radii leugfhe and supplemental Inf i n Ion. LARGE OMMERC1AL OR UBUC ROAD R STREET Lane Width LEGEND Q Graded Or Pored ® Rewired Paving ® Limits Of Department maintenance NOTES 1. Auxlllwy lane pavements and crossover pavements shall be maintained by the Department. 2, Department mointenace of to nmf pavement shall extend out to 5'from edge of the travel way or limits of paved shoulders, aid, extend to include auxiliary Imes. The remainder of any turnout paved area on the right of Of routinely rl ewn�1ng shoulders, v� Departmment mrrlazyYedggrr�a shape melon existing material on non -paved areas beyond the maintained pavement. J. Control and maintenance of drainage facilities within the right of way shell be soley the responsibility of the Deportment, unless specified differently by Deportment permit 4. The molatena ce and operoNon of hiohwoy lighting, trofflo alogawale, associated equipment, and other neoessavy devices shall be the reaponarbllity of a public ageholl. 5. All pavement markings on the State hlyewys, including awelerotlon and deceleration lone markings, and siQQnn1 installed for fhe operamon of the State hlgtwway shall be malatainad ty the Deportaent. 6. All sl � Installed he lnllmon s sop= e. � snf comedo) shbetthe re responsibility fe lfteof L/M/ TS OF CONSTRUCTION AND MAINTENANCE FOR RURAL CONNECTIONS 0 =3 RURAL TURNOUT CONSTRUCTION 2M8 FDOT Design St�rtdL Lcat - 00 4' Min Residential Street 1' City R W Remove Back of Curb on State or Vertical Curbs with a vertical Saw cut 20. 5' Min Arterial Street 2' County R/ or Remove entire Curb and Replace as Part of Sidewalk Ramp. 1" cv 12 Modified and Valley Gutter Curbs 1/4" per Foot join exist back of curb ~- 12" Textured Surface ; X000 psi gong 4" thick. Constr. 6" 1 0 Max Slope Back of Curb P �,� • :. • thick at driveways with 6x6 #10 Remove to an Welded wire mesh. See note 7. '--,,1/2" Expansion Joint even joint or sawcut SECTION A -A SECTION B -B NOTES: 1. Provide tooled Joints at distances matching the width. Also 8. Ramps shall have a tactile surface, textured to a depth not place expansion joints at driveways. exceeding 1/8" by use of tamp or roller in conformance with 2. If some physical obstruction exists which prevents the placing requirements of FOOT Roadway and Traffic Design Standards, of sidewalks as shown, contact the Engineering Division for Detail 304 or most recent modifications. alternate location. 3. Wooden and other spacers will not be permitted in sidewalks or driveways. DESIGNED THE SIGNATURE OF THE OUALITY 4. No coatings of any kind will be permitted on concrete C I 1 P CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA sidewalks or driveways without specific approval of the City I JD PUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATION 5. All concrete shall be 3000 psi min. m 28 days, with fiber 3 3 4/9/02 Rev, Notes R R.G. ENGINEERING mesh reinforcing. 2 2 1/93 added note R REDRAtJCN BY TYPICAL SIDEWALK 6. Concrete surface to be light broom finish. C t 11/93 modified curb sat J CHECKED BY CONSTRUCTION AND I welded wire mesh reinforcement. R T.C.J. REV. DATE DESCRIPTION I I App, IDTG9 B N Q.C. Y Shoulder. Sod -See Index 9J Seems its Width !Vales) Shoulder I 1+ 4 5th Dro/repe Plpe1f / +�S4Y F.L. Rdwy. Ditch FL Mitered End Sedfan Miter& Index No. 273 (See O Varlee- Defemtned By Slooe Intel LONGITUDINAL SECTION Roo&W Shoulder. Turnout Taper Or Turnout Auxiliary Lanes Povt Sae She 1 4/14/95 ometrlc vkw redrawn Pyyp TYPICAL SIDEWALK 1 93 1 1/95 Added note CHECKED BY CURB CUT RAMPS INDEX NO. ExistllIgOrProposed Drive oESTT -C- BY PHYSICALLY HANDICAPPED 109 _ REV. DATE DESCRIPTION APP. C.M.H. 2 OF 3 Point Of Connection 0 I Remove Curb if Existin PROFILE AND END VIEW Exist Conc Drive Drainage pipe size and length shall be that shown on the plan, or as stipulated tty permit. or. as determined by the Engineer ollring construction. The size shall be at teat that established by Me FDOT District, but not less than 15" diameter or ew/volent. „ " For alnimum cover over drolmge pipe see Index No. 805. Pipe arch or elllptloal pipe may be required to obtain necessary cover. Max Slope ��1" 1" 1�_ Max Slope Atml nlmal oover applications a modified pavementapron Ispermllfed. See 'PERMISSIBLE PAVEMENT MONFICATiONlindexNo.93. l For spaoing between o0 oent pipe and treatments see Index Na. 93. ; ; •R ;:�• ,� •, , .: ,• ;A Stable material may be rewired for grodad furnouts fa prlvote property as directed by the Engineer In aowi*we with Section •ti+ 4" ® A02 -6 Of the Standard SpeottiarJ►olla. „ 1 /2" Exp. Joint , 1 /2 Exp. Joint 6n 0 The 5 pavement at graded conneafians Is not required where there Is paved shoulder 4 or more In width. The 5'paement requirement may be wnNed for connections serving one or two lames or field entrances with leas than 20 }rips per day, MATERIAL TYPES AND THICKNESSES IN DRIVING AREAS FOR RURAL AND URBAN CONNECTIONS Thickness (In.) Course Materials ® Connections 0 Rgadway® Structural Asphaltic Concrete 11 1 " Bases Optional Base (See index No. 514) O.B.G. i O.B.G. 3 (D Minimum thlam"s. ® All materials shall be approved by the Department prior to being placed. ® Connection structure other than troffio }area. See Notes land 2 below. ® Travel way flares (bypass /ones), auxiliary ranee serving more than d single connection, and all med/on aossavers Including their ouxlllary Janes and /or transition fopere. See Noise /and 2 below. NOTES 1. Thor pavement should be sinahuroly adequate to meet the expected troPflo /oafs and ahould not be leas than that shown above, except as gaproved by tie Department for graded connections. Other Department gapraed pavement eWAV/snoes mqy be used at the discretion of the Engineer. For additional Information see Index No. 514. 2 Auxillary lanes and Their franaltron fapers shall be the acme structure as the abuitn , rodd wcy pavement or any of the stnvAires tabulated above, whichever Is thicker. J. If an asphalt base course is used for a turnout, Its th/okneaa may be Moreased to match the edge of roaowvy pavement In lieu of a separate structural course. 6" of Portland cement concrete will be acceptable In lieu of the actpfaalt base and stnA*mlcouraes. See Notes 4 and 5 below. 4. A structural course Is required for flexible pavements when they are used for auxiliary Ames aervft more Than a aingle connection. S. C aneoflans paved with Portland cement concrete shall be Class X concrete of least 6" thick. The Department may require greater thickness when called for In the plans or alipulaled by permit. Materials and oonatruction are to oonform with FDOT Standard Speorflootions Sections 346, 350 and 522. 6. The Department may require other pavement criteria where loom oondltims warrant. TYPICAL DRIVEWAY CROSS SECTION ors trips par hour as approved bypemitorbyMe Engineer, or when not Itemized in the plans. PAVEMENT STRUCTURE FOR TURNOUTS AND AUXILIARY LANES Paved hlrrads are to be amstruated for allpoved connecting facilities. The connecting point wUlbs determined by the Engineer. TABLE 515-1 Paved lurnaufs are to be owhWed for all bminess, commercial, Indutrial or high volume residential graded oomedIng facilities. The amnecflrp point shall be 3a from edge of rav&V pavement or at RAW line, whichever Ia less. Paved furnouts are to be constructed for all connecting fooNrfles over 4000 vehicles per day. The connecting point shall be at the R/W line. 0 See *Summary Of Geometrlo Requirements For Turnouts" chart for return radii leugfhe and supplemental Inf i n Ion. LARGE OMMERC1AL OR UBUC ROAD R STREET Lane Width LEGEND Q Graded Or Pored ® Rewired Paving ® Limits Of Department maintenance NOTES 1. Auxlllwy lane pavements and crossover pavements shall be maintained by the Department. 2, Department mointenace of to nmf pavement shall extend out to 5'from edge of the travel way or limits of paved shoulders, aid, extend to include auxiliary Imes. The remainder of any turnout paved area on the right of Of routinely rl ewn�1ng shoulders, v� Departmment mrrlazyYedggrr�a shape melon existing material on non -paved areas beyond the maintained pavement. J. Control and maintenance of drainage facilities within the right of way shell be soley the responsibility of the Deportment, unless specified differently by Deportment permit 4. The molatena ce and operoNon of hiohwoy lighting, trofflo alogawale, associated equipment, and other neoessavy devices shall be the reaponarbllity of a public ageholl. 5. All pavement markings on the State hlyewys, including awelerotlon and deceleration lone markings, and siQQnn1 installed for fhe operamon of the State hlgtwway shall be malatainad ty the Deportaent. 6. All sl � Installed he lnllmon s sop= e. � snf comedo) shbetthe re responsibility fe lfteof L/M/ TS OF CONSTRUCTION AND MAINTENANCE FOR RURAL CONNECTIONS 0 =3 RURAL TURNOUT CONSTRUCTION 2M8 FDOT Design St�rtdL Lcat - 00 4' Min Residential Street 1' City R W Remove Back of Curb on State or Vertical Curbs with a vertical Saw cut 20. 5' Min Arterial Street 2' County R/ or Remove entire Curb and Replace as Part of Sidewalk Ramp. 1" cv 12 Modified and Valley Gutter Curbs 1/4" per Foot join exist back of curb ~- 12" Textured Surface ; X000 psi gong 4" thick. Constr. 6" 1 0 Max Slope Back of Curb P �,� • :. • thick at driveways with 6x6 #10 Remove to an Welded wire mesh. See note 7. '--,,1/2" Expansion Joint even joint or sawcut SECTION A -A SECTION B -B NOTES: 1. Provide tooled Joints at distances matching the width. Also 8. Ramps shall have a tactile surface, textured to a depth not place expansion joints at driveways. exceeding 1/8" by use of tamp or roller in conformance with 2. If some physical obstruction exists which prevents the placing requirements of FOOT Roadway and Traffic Design Standards, of sidewalks as shown, contact the Engineering Division for Detail 304 or most recent modifications. alternate location. 3. Wooden and other spacers will not be permitted in sidewalks or driveways. DESIGNED LONGITUDINAL SECTION Roo&W Shoulder. Turnout Taper Or Turnout Auxiliary Lanes Povt Sae She 1 4/14/95 ometrlc vkw redrawn Pyyp TYPICAL SIDEWALK 1 93 1 1/95 Added note CHECKED BY CURB CUT RAMPS INDEX NO. ExistllIgOrProposed Drive oESTT -C- BY PHYSICALLY HANDICAPPED 109 _ REV. DATE DESCRIPTION APP. C.M.H. 2 OF 3 Point Of Connection 0 I Remove Curb if Existin PROFILE AND END VIEW Exist Conc Drive Drainage pipe size and length shall be that shown on the plan, or as stipulated tty permit. or. as determined by the Engineer ollring construction. The size shall be at teat that established by Me FDOT District, but not less than 15" diameter or ew/volent. „ " For alnimum cover over drolmge pipe see Index No. 805. Pipe arch or elllptloal pipe may be required to obtain necessary cover. Max Slope ��1" 1" 1�_ Max Slope Atml nlmal oover applications a modified pavementapron Ispermllfed. See 'PERMISSIBLE PAVEMENT MONFICATiONlindexNo.93. l For spaoing between o0 oent pipe and treatments see Index Na. 93. ; ; •R ;:�• ,� •, , .: ,• ;A Stable material may be rewired for grodad furnouts fa prlvote property as directed by the Engineer In aowi*we with Section •ti+ 4" ® A02 -6 Of the Standard SpeottiarJ►olla. „ 1 /2" Exp. Joint , 1 /2 Exp. Joint 6n 0 The 5 pavement at graded conneafians Is not required where there Is paved shoulder 4 or more In width. The 5'paement requirement may be wnNed for connections serving one or two lames or field entrances with leas than 20 }rips per day, MATERIAL TYPES AND THICKNESSES IN DRIVING AREAS FOR RURAL AND URBAN CONNECTIONS Thickness (In.) Course Materials ® Connections 0 Rgadway® Structural Asphaltic Concrete 11 1 " Bases Optional Base (See index No. 514) O.B.G. i O.B.G. 3 (D Minimum thlam"s. ® All materials shall be approved by the Department prior to being placed. ® Connection structure other than troffio }area. See Notes land 2 below. ® Travel way flares (bypass /ones), auxiliary ranee serving more than d single connection, and all med/on aossavers Including their ouxlllary Janes and /or transition fopere. See Noise /and 2 below. NOTES 1. Thor pavement should be sinahuroly adequate to meet the expected troPflo /oafs and ahould not be leas than that shown above, except as gaproved by tie Department for graded connections. Other Department gapraed pavement eWAV/snoes mqy be used at the discretion of the Engineer. For additional Information see Index No. 514. 2 Auxillary lanes and Their franaltron fapers shall be the acme structure as the abuitn , rodd wcy pavement or any of the stnvAires tabulated above, whichever Is thicker. J. If an asphalt base course is used for a turnout, Its th/okneaa may be Moreased to match the edge of roaowvy pavement In lieu of a separate structural course. 6" of Portland cement concrete will be acceptable In lieu of the actpfaalt base and stnA*mlcouraes. See Notes 4 and 5 below. 4. A structural course Is required for flexible pavements when they are used for auxiliary Ames aervft more Than a aingle connection. S. C aneoflans paved with Portland cement concrete shall be Class X concrete of least 6" thick. The Department may require greater thickness when called for In the plans or alipulaled by permit. Materials and oonatruction are to oonform with FDOT Standard Speorflootions Sections 346, 350 and 522. 6. The Department may require other pavement criteria where loom oondltims warrant. TYPICAL DRIVEWAY CROSS SECTION ors trips par hour as approved bypemitorbyMe Engineer, or when not Itemized in the plans. PAVEMENT STRUCTURE FOR TURNOUTS AND AUXILIARY LANES Paved hlrrads are to be amstruated for allpoved connecting facilities. The connecting point wUlbs determined by the Engineer. TABLE 515-1 Paved lurnaufs are to be owhWed for all bminess, commercial, Indutrial or high volume residential graded oomedIng facilities. The amnecflrp point shall be 3a from edge of rav&V pavement or at RAW line, whichever Ia less. Paved furnouts are to be constructed for all connecting fooNrfles over 4000 vehicles per day. The connecting point shall be at the R/W line. 0 See *Summary Of Geometrlo Requirements For Turnouts" chart for return radii leugfhe and supplemental Inf i n Ion. LARGE OMMERC1AL OR UBUC ROAD R STREET Lane Width LEGEND Q Graded Or Pored ® Rewired Paving ® Limits Of Department maintenance NOTES 1. Auxlllwy lane pavements and crossover pavements shall be maintained by the Department. 2, Department mointenace of to nmf pavement shall extend out to 5'from edge of the travel way or limits of paved shoulders, aid, extend to include auxiliary Imes. The remainder of any turnout paved area on the right of Of routinely rl ewn�1ng shoulders, v� Departmment mrrlazyYedggrr�a shape melon existing material on non -paved areas beyond the maintained pavement. J. Control and maintenance of drainage facilities within the right of way shell be soley the responsibility of the Deportment, unless specified differently by Deportment permit 4. The molatena ce and operoNon of hiohwoy lighting, trofflo alogawale, associated equipment, and other neoessavy devices shall be the reaponarbllity of a public ageholl. 5. All pavement markings on the State hlyewys, including awelerotlon and deceleration lone markings, and siQQnn1 installed for fhe operamon of the State hlgtwway shall be malatainad ty the Deportaent. 6. All sl � Installed he lnllmon s sop= e. � snf comedo) shbetthe re responsibility fe lfteof L/M/ TS OF CONSTRUCTION AND MAINTENANCE FOR RURAL CONNECTIONS 0 =3 RURAL TURNOUT CONSTRUCTION 2M8 FDOT Design St�rtdL Lcat - 00 4' Min Residential Street 1' City R W Remove Back of Curb on State or Vertical Curbs with a vertical Saw cut 20. 5' Min Arterial Street 2' County R/ or Remove entire Curb and Replace as Part of Sidewalk Ramp. 1" cv 12 Modified and Valley Gutter Curbs 1/4" per Foot join exist back of curb ~- 12" Textured Surface ; X000 psi gong 4" thick. Constr. 6" 1 0 Max Slope Back of Curb P �,� • :. • thick at driveways with 6x6 #10 Remove to an Welded wire mesh. See note 7. '--,,1/2" Expansion Joint even joint or sawcut SECTION A -A SECTION B -B NOTES: 1. Provide tooled Joints at distances matching the width. Also 8. Ramps shall have a tactile surface, textured to a depth not place expansion joints at driveways. exceeding 1/8" by use of tamp or roller in conformance with 2. If some physical obstruction exists which prevents the placing requirements of FOOT Roadway and Traffic Design Standards, of sidewalks as shown, contact the Engineering Division for Detail 304 or most recent modifications. alternate location. 3. Wooden and other spacers will not be permitted in sidewalks or driveways. DESIGNED THE SIGNATURE OF THE OUALITY 4. No coatings of any kind will be permitted on concrete C I 1 P CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA sidewalks or driveways without specific approval of the City I JD PUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATION 5. All concrete shall be 3000 psi min. m 28 days, with fiber 3 3 4/9/02 Rev, Notes R R.G. ENGINEERING mesh reinforcing. 2 2 1/93 added note R REDRAtJCN BY TYPICAL SIDEWALK 6. Concrete surface to be light broom finish. C t 11/93 modified curb sat J CHECKED BY CONSTRUCTION AND I welded wire mesh reinforcement. R T.C.J. REV. DATE DESCRIPTION I I App, IDTG9 B N Q.C. Y MATERIAL TYPES AND THICKNESSES IN DRIVING AREAS FOR RURAL AND URBAN CONNECTIONS Thickness (In.) Course Materials ® Connections 0 Rgadway® Structural Asphaltic Concrete 11 1 " Bases Optional Base (See index No. 514) O.B.G. i O.B.G. 3 (D Minimum thlam"s. ® All materials shall be approved by the Department prior to being placed. ® Connection structure other than troffio }area. See Notes land 2 below. ® Travel way flares (bypass /ones), auxiliary ranee serving more than d single connection, and all med/on aossavers Including their ouxlllary Janes and /or transition fopere. See Noise /and 2 below. NOTES 1. Thor pavement should be sinahuroly adequate to meet the expected troPflo /oafs and ahould not be leas than that shown above, except as gaproved by tie Department for graded connections. Other Department gapraed pavement eWAV/snoes mqy be used at the discretion of the Engineer. For additional Information see Index No. 514. 2 Auxillary lanes and Their franaltron fapers shall be the acme structure as the abuitn , rodd wcy pavement or any of the stnvAires tabulated above, whichever Is thicker. J. If an asphalt base course is used for a turnout, Its th/okneaa may be Moreased to match the edge of roaowvy pavement In lieu of a separate structural course. 6" of Portland cement concrete will be acceptable In lieu of the actpfaalt base and stnA*mlcouraes. See Notes 4 and 5 below. 4. A structural course Is required for flexible pavements when they are used for auxiliary Ames aervft more Than a aingle connection. S. C aneoflans paved with Portland cement concrete shall be Class X concrete of least 6" thick. The Department may require greater thickness when called for In the plans or alipulaled by permit. Materials and oonatruction are to oonform with FDOT Standard Speorflootions Sections 346, 350 and 522. 6. The Department may require other pavement criteria where loom oondltims warrant. TYPICAL DRIVEWAY CROSS SECTION ors trips par hour as approved bypemitorbyMe Engineer, or when not Itemized in the plans. PAVEMENT STRUCTURE FOR TURNOUTS AND AUXILIARY LANES Paved hlrrads are to be amstruated for allpoved connecting facilities. The connecting point wUlbs determined by the Engineer. TABLE 515-1 Paved lurnaufs are to be owhWed for all bminess, commercial, Indutrial or high volume residential graded oomedIng facilities. The amnecflrp point shall be 3a from edge of rav&V pavement or at RAW line, whichever Ia less. Paved furnouts are to be constructed for all connecting fooNrfles over 4000 vehicles per day. The connecting point shall be at the R/W line. 0 See *Summary Of Geometrlo Requirements For Turnouts" chart for return radii leugfhe and supplemental Inf i n Ion. LARGE OMMERC1AL OR UBUC ROAD R STREET Lane Width LEGEND Q Graded Or Pored ® Rewired Paving ® Limits Of Department maintenance NOTES 1. Auxlllwy lane pavements and crossover pavements shall be maintained by the Department. 2, Department mointenace of to nmf pavement shall extend out to 5'from edge of the travel way or limits of paved shoulders, aid, extend to include auxiliary Imes. The remainder of any turnout paved area on the right of Of routinely rl ewn�1ng shoulders, v� Departmment mrrlazyYedggrr�a shape melon existing material on non -paved areas beyond the maintained pavement. J. Control and maintenance of drainage facilities within the right of way shell be soley the responsibility of the Deportment, unless specified differently by Deportment permit 4. The molatena ce and operoNon of hiohwoy lighting, trofflo alogawale, associated equipment, and other neoessavy devices shall be the reaponarbllity of a public ageholl. 5. All pavement markings on the State hlyewys, including awelerotlon and deceleration lone markings, and siQQnn1 installed for fhe operamon of the State hlgtwway shall be malatainad ty the Deportaent. 6. All sl � Installed he lnllmon s sop= e. � snf comedo) shbetthe re responsibility fe lfteof L/M/ TS OF CONSTRUCTION AND MAINTENANCE FOR RURAL CONNECTIONS 0 =3 RURAL TURNOUT CONSTRUCTION 2M8 FDOT Design St�rtdL Lcat - 00 4' Min Residential Street 1' City R W Remove Back of Curb on State or Vertical Curbs with a vertical Saw cut 20. 5' Min Arterial Street 2' County R/ or Remove entire Curb and Replace as Part of Sidewalk Ramp. 1" cv 12 Modified and Valley Gutter Curbs 1/4" per Foot join exist back of curb ~- 12" Textured Surface ; X000 psi gong 4" thick. Constr. 6" 1 0 Max Slope Back of Curb P �,� • :. • thick at driveways with 6x6 #10 Remove to an Welded wire mesh. See note 7. '--,,1/2" Expansion Joint even joint or sawcut SECTION A -A SECTION B -B NOTES: 1. Provide tooled Joints at distances matching the width. Also 8. Ramps shall have a tactile surface, textured to a depth not place expansion joints at driveways. exceeding 1/8" by use of tamp or roller in conformance with 2. If some physical obstruction exists which prevents the placing requirements of FOOT Roadway and Traffic Design Standards, of sidewalks as shown, contact the Engineering Division for Detail 304 or most recent modifications. alternate location. 3. Wooden and other spacers will not be permitted in sidewalks or driveways. DESIGNED THE SIGNATURE OF THE OUALITY 4. No coatings of any kind will be permitted on concrete C I 1 P CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA sidewalks or driveways without specific approval of the City I JD PUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATION 5. All concrete shall be 3000 psi min. m 28 days, with fiber 3 3 4/9/02 Rev, Notes R R.G. ENGINEERING mesh reinforcing. 2 2 1/93 added note R REDRAtJCN BY TYPICAL SIDEWALK 6. Concrete surface to be light broom finish. C t 11/93 modified curb sat J CHECKED BY CONSTRUCTION AND I welded wire mesh reinforcement. R T.C.J. REV. DATE DESCRIPTION I I App, IDTG9 B N Q.C. Y TYPICAL DRIVEWAY CROSS SECTION ors trips par hour as approved bypemitorbyMe Engineer, or when not Itemized in the plans. PAVEMENT STRUCTURE FOR TURNOUTS AND AUXILIARY LANES Paved hlrrads are to be amstruated for allpoved connecting facilities. The connecting point wUlbs determined by the Engineer. TABLE 515-1 Paved lurnaufs are to be owhWed for all bminess, commercial, Indutrial or high volume residential graded oomedIng facilities. The amnecflrp point shall be 3a from edge of rav&V pavement or at RAW line, whichever Ia less. Paved furnouts are to be constructed for all connecting fooNrfles over 4000 vehicles per day. The connecting point shall be at the R/W line. 0 See *Summary Of Geometrlo Requirements For Turnouts" chart for return radii leugfhe and supplemental Inf i n Ion. LARGE OMMERC1AL OR UBUC ROAD R STREET Lane Width LEGEND Q Graded Or Pored ® Rewired Paving ® Limits Of Department maintenance NOTES 1. Auxlllwy lane pavements and crossover pavements shall be maintained by the Department. 2, Department mointenace of to nmf pavement shall extend out to 5'from edge of the travel way or limits of paved shoulders, aid, extend to include auxiliary Imes. The remainder of any turnout paved area on the right of Of routinely rl ewn�1ng shoulders, v� Departmment mrrlazyYedggrr�a shape melon existing material on non -paved areas beyond the maintained pavement. J. Control and maintenance of drainage facilities within the right of way shell be soley the responsibility of the Deportment, unless specified differently by Deportment permit 4. The molatena ce and operoNon of hiohwoy lighting, trofflo alogawale, associated equipment, and other neoessavy devices shall be the reaponarbllity of a public ageholl. 5. All pavement markings on the State hlyewys, including awelerotlon and deceleration lone markings, and siQQnn1 installed for fhe operamon of the State hlgtwway shall be malatainad ty the Deportaent. 6. All sl � Installed he lnllmon s sop= e. � snf comedo) shbetthe re responsibility fe lfteof L/M/ TS OF CONSTRUCTION AND MAINTENANCE FOR RURAL CONNECTIONS 0 =3 RURAL TURNOUT CONSTRUCTION 2M8 FDOT Design St�rtdL Lcat - 00 4' Min Residential Street 1' City R W Remove Back of Curb on State or Vertical Curbs with a vertical Saw cut 20. 5' Min Arterial Street 2' County R/ or Remove entire Curb and Replace as Part of Sidewalk Ramp. 1" cv 12 Modified and Valley Gutter Curbs 1/4" per Foot join exist back of curb ~- 12" Textured Surface ; X000 psi gong 4" thick. Constr. 6" 1 0 Max Slope Back of Curb P �,� • :. • thick at driveways with 6x6 #10 Remove to an Welded wire mesh. See note 7. '--,,1/2" Expansion Joint even joint or sawcut SECTION A -A SECTION B -B NOTES: 1. Provide tooled Joints at distances matching the width. Also 8. Ramps shall have a tactile surface, textured to a depth not place expansion joints at driveways. exceeding 1/8" by use of tamp or roller in conformance with 2. If some physical obstruction exists which prevents the placing requirements of FOOT Roadway and Traffic Design Standards, of sidewalks as shown, contact the Engineering Division for Detail 304 or most recent modifications. alternate location. 3. Wooden and other spacers will not be permitted in sidewalks or driveways. DESIGNED THE SIGNATURE OF THE OUALITY 4. No coatings of any kind will be permitted on concrete C I 1 P CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA sidewalks or driveways without specific approval of the City I JD PUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATION 5. All concrete shall be 3000 psi min. m 28 days, with fiber 3 3 4/9/02 Rev, Notes R R.G. ENGINEERING mesh reinforcing. 2 2 1/93 added note R REDRAtJCN BY TYPICAL SIDEWALK 6. Concrete surface to be light broom finish. C t 11/93 modified curb sat J CHECKED BY CONSTRUCTION AND I welded wire mesh reinforcement. R T.C.J. REV. DATE DESCRIPTION I I App, IDTG9 B 2 -1/2' thin fU t 0 o In E C I E 7 -3/4' o TYPE A OI Cnr 3 v a a 0 1 N❑TEI Concrete to be 3,000 psi, with fiber mesh relnforcing. Z' rein , CUI CU tU .� I fU •" \ �43r 7_1/21 #3 Bar Typical Typical 1 4/9/02 Rev. Notes APP. REV. DATE DESCRIPTKN ND 09NO. 1 OF 3 CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA I PUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATION ENGINEERING N 1E1X7 NO. 1OF1 PREPARED FOR: FLORIDA IDS SIGN CONSUL TeA TS, INC. ENGINEERS, ENVIRONMENTALISTS, SURVEYORS 8 PLANNERS 3030 Starkey Blvd, New Port Richey FL 34655 Tel: (727) 849 -7588 - Fax, (727) 848 -3648 E.B. No. 7421 PLAN Sheet ido. 04 5 of 6 TURNOUTS Index On ROVS That Are Perpendlealar With The Curb Line, The Dome Pattern Shall Be In-Line 161 Min. With The Direction Of Travel. On Ramps " Intersecting Curbs On A Radius, The Dome �s -21�{ 2.4 Max. Pattern Shall Be In -Line With The Direction Of Edge Of DetectaNe I �"I Trove! To The Extent Practical. Warning 1 0.91 Min. N - -- -� b , 0 1.41 Max. 0.2" s 0.02 Truncated Dome integral Dome --0 0 0 c ' 0 0 0 The top width of the dome shall be a minimum of 50% and a maxlmum of 65% of the base diameter. 0 0 0 0 TRUNCATED DOME Base- to-base spacing shal /be 0.65" minimum between domes. PLAN VIEW AN Sidewalk Curb Ramps Shall Have Detectable Warning Surfaces That Extend The Full Wldtb Of The Ramp And In The Direction Of Travel 24 Inches f 617 mm) From The Back Of Curb. CURB RAMP DETECTABLE WARNING DETAIL ,4 y zl II\ PICTORIAL VIEWS PLAN TYPICAL PLACEMENT OF DETECTABLE WARNING ON CURB RAMPS 20M FDOT Design Slandamb t shoot No. 07/01/05 6 of 6 PUBLIC SIDEWALK CURB RAMPS ' °x " °• SHEET DESCRIPTION, R.J. HEISENBOTTLE ARCHITECTS, P.A. BELLEVIEW BILTMORE CABANA CLUB 2199 PONCE DE LEON BOULEVARD, SUITE 400 SITE PLAN CORAL GABLES, FLORIDA 33134 PHONE: (305) 446 -7799 FAX: (305) 446 -9275 PAVING, GRADING AND DRAINAGE DETAILS Idewalk Curb Where Necessary) Utility Strip HANDICAPPED SIGN D E TA I L 1' -0" STANDARD PRE - PAINTED DISABLED PARKING SIGN WHITE BORDER }..v .x. ON 1/8" THICK SHEET ALUMINUM BLUE BACKGROUND BLACK BORDER & LETTERS WHITE BACKGROUND BLACK BORDER & LETTERS WHITE BACKGROUND ALL LETTERS 1" SERIES "C" J. II I -II $w V I 0 2" HOT DIPPED GALVANIZED STANDARD WEIGHT STEEL PIPE B "X2' -6" CONCRETE MASS. FINISH TOP OF MASS LEVEL NfTH A SLIGHT RAISED WASH 4PPROXIMATELY 1/2- ABOVE LEVEL OF TURF /SOD. CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA PUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATION ENGINEERING REDARt`wN BY I DATE TYPICAL HANDICAPPED INDEX N 1 12/90 Updated Flne M.G. �� BY INDEX N0. M.O. BY SIGN DETAIL 119 REV. DATE DESCRIPTION APP. M G 1 OF 1 HANDICAPPED SIGNS -�� -SEE INDEX NO. 119 -� CONC. WALK RAMP DOWN RAMP DOWN CON& WALK SEE INDEX NO. 109 SEE INDEX N0. 109 I VTRAFFIC WHiTE + 6- STROKE o (TYPICAL) 10 so. V -D* I 12'_0- � 5'_0- 2' j ,_D- 2- (TYPICAL)-1 r 29'-0- WIDE TRAFFIC BLUE ;IPE (TYPICAL) 6" VIDE TRAFFIC WHITE STRIPE (TYPICAL) �4ANDiCAFFE[:) STALL DET,41L NOTE: All pavement markings to be thermoplastic. CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA PUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATION ENGINEERING REDARAWN BY I DATE CC s COCKED BY TYPICAL DOUBLE INDEX X N0. REV. DATE DESCRIPTION APP, DESIGNED BY HANDICAPPED STALL 119 N M.G. 2 OF 2 rn iu a 3 O 4= 3 a: U 7 O a r r= f•. 0 O ! O vOi c vi ( o wtom,% E rn a Q) U C O U C 0 W to o �• , O e• � 1. a) r ° U .' J06-NO. U •, r -2007-25A `o EPN L� . 263 0 F.B. & PG. C S O SHT. N 7/14/08 ADDED FDOT INDEX 304 DETAIL PER C.O.C. PER COMMENTS (7/3/08) o, 1 6/11/08 REV. HANDICAP SIGN F.S. CHAPTER PER C.O.C. DRC COMMENTS (5/1/08) a DATE. NO. DATE REVISIONS ABPY'D 1 /31 /08 OF 1 1 U O i a CL DESIGNED THE SIGNATURE OF THE OUALITY CONTROL OFFICER IN THIS SPACE N E JD INDICATES THAT ALL REQUIRED v DRAWN PERMITS HAVE BEEN OBTAINED o RD /JEB AND THAT CONSTRUCTION IS CHECKED AUTHORIZED TO COMMENCE. P° OC N Q.C. Y N❑TEI Concrete to be 3,000 psi, with fiber mesh relnforcing. Z' rein , CUI CU tU .� I fU •" \ �43r 7_1/21 #3 Bar Typical Typical 1 4/9/02 Rev. Notes APP. REV. DATE DESCRIPTKN ND 09NO. 1 OF 3 CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA I PUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATION ENGINEERING N 1E1X7 NO. 1OF1 PREPARED FOR: FLORIDA IDS SIGN CONSUL TeA TS, INC. ENGINEERS, ENVIRONMENTALISTS, SURVEYORS 8 PLANNERS 3030 Starkey Blvd, New Port Richey FL 34655 Tel: (727) 849 -7588 - Fax, (727) 848 -3648 E.B. No. 7421 PLAN Sheet ido. 04 5 of 6 TURNOUTS Index On ROVS That Are Perpendlealar With The Curb Line, The Dome Pattern Shall Be In-Line 161 Min. With The Direction Of Travel. On Ramps " Intersecting Curbs On A Radius, The Dome �s -21�{ 2.4 Max. Pattern Shall Be In -Line With The Direction Of Edge Of DetectaNe I �"I Trove! To The Extent Practical. Warning 1 0.91 Min. N - -- -� b , 0 1.41 Max. 0.2" s 0.02 Truncated Dome integral Dome --0 0 0 c ' 0 0 0 The top width of the dome shall be a minimum of 50% and a maxlmum of 65% of the base diameter. 0 0 0 0 TRUNCATED DOME Base- to-base spacing shal /be 0.65" minimum between domes. PLAN VIEW AN Sidewalk Curb Ramps Shall Have Detectable Warning Surfaces That Extend The Full Wldtb Of The Ramp And In The Direction Of Travel 24 Inches f 617 mm) From The Back Of Curb. CURB RAMP DETECTABLE WARNING DETAIL ,4 y zl II\ PICTORIAL VIEWS PLAN TYPICAL PLACEMENT OF DETECTABLE WARNING ON CURB RAMPS 20M FDOT Design Slandamb t shoot No. 07/01/05 6 of 6 PUBLIC SIDEWALK CURB RAMPS ' °x " °• SHEET DESCRIPTION, R.J. HEISENBOTTLE ARCHITECTS, P.A. BELLEVIEW BILTMORE CABANA CLUB 2199 PONCE DE LEON BOULEVARD, SUITE 400 SITE PLAN CORAL GABLES, FLORIDA 33134 PHONE: (305) 446 -7799 FAX: (305) 446 -9275 PAVING, GRADING AND DRAINAGE DETAILS Idewalk Curb Where Necessary) Utility Strip HANDICAPPED SIGN D E TA I L 1' -0" STANDARD PRE - PAINTED DISABLED PARKING SIGN WHITE BORDER }..v .x. ON 1/8" THICK SHEET ALUMINUM BLUE BACKGROUND BLACK BORDER & LETTERS WHITE BACKGROUND BLACK BORDER & LETTERS WHITE BACKGROUND ALL LETTERS 1" SERIES "C" J. II I -II $w V I 0 2" HOT DIPPED GALVANIZED STANDARD WEIGHT STEEL PIPE B "X2' -6" CONCRETE MASS. FINISH TOP OF MASS LEVEL NfTH A SLIGHT RAISED WASH 4PPROXIMATELY 1/2- ABOVE LEVEL OF TURF /SOD. CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA PUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATION ENGINEERING REDARt`wN BY I DATE TYPICAL HANDICAPPED INDEX N 1 12/90 Updated Flne M.G. �� BY INDEX N0. M.O. BY SIGN DETAIL 119 REV. DATE DESCRIPTION APP. M G 1 OF 1 HANDICAPPED SIGNS -�� -SEE INDEX NO. 119 -� CONC. WALK RAMP DOWN RAMP DOWN CON& WALK SEE INDEX NO. 109 SEE INDEX N0. 109 I VTRAFFIC WHiTE + 6- STROKE o (TYPICAL) 10 so. V -D* I 12'_0- � 5'_0- 2' j ,_D- 2- (TYPICAL)-1 r 29'-0- WIDE TRAFFIC BLUE ;IPE (TYPICAL) 6" VIDE TRAFFIC WHITE STRIPE (TYPICAL) �4ANDiCAFFE[:) STALL DET,41L NOTE: All pavement markings to be thermoplastic. CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA PUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATION ENGINEERING REDARAWN BY I DATE CC s COCKED BY TYPICAL DOUBLE INDEX X N0. REV. DATE DESCRIPTION APP, DESIGNED BY HANDICAPPED STALL 119 N M.G. 2 OF 2 rn iu a 3 O 4= 3 a: U 7 O a r r= f•. 0 O ! O vOi c vi ( o wtom,% E rn a Q) U C O U C 0 W to o �• , O e• � 1. a) r ° U .' J06-NO. U •, r -2007-25A `o EPN L� . 263 0 F.B. & PG. C S O SHT. N 7/14/08 ADDED FDOT INDEX 304 DETAIL PER C.O.C. PER COMMENTS (7/3/08) o, 1 6/11/08 REV. HANDICAP SIGN F.S. CHAPTER PER C.O.C. DRC COMMENTS (5/1/08) a DATE. NO. DATE REVISIONS ABPY'D 1 /31 /08 OF 1 1 U O N 0 E I E M M 00 0 0 N SEE DETAIL ABOVE) _ PVC TAPE CLAMP \- FILTER FABRIC IIL PVC VAULT DETAILS •r, -ar mot WALL DEPTH PLAN AREA ( In") 5i' CIPL 3' -4" CIPL 3' -0" Precast -- 5J' CIPL 3J" Precast- 2_ �_ . 3i" Precast 1 12" 1 8" 61-10' A6 Grote 1 7 Eye Bolt 13 -� 3" Cl. See Index 201 0.20 Hon. wall Reinf. See Index 201 n (See Table 2 *4 Bars O !2" Ctrs. o 3 ' N *41B s �s N o Ctrs. CIPL c *4 Bars o Precast SECTION 12 Ctrs. HORIZONTAL WALL REINFORCING SCHEDULES ( TABLE I) WALL DEPTH SCHEO(lLE AREA ( In") MAX. SPACING BARS WWF - Al2 1 0.20 1 12" 1 8" 61-10' A6 r Grate 6" 13 -� DHW ?a =S 85' 0 EL =5.45' TREATMENT VOLUME 6" D I A @ 5' 0. C. 4, -8a YT INSIDE TOP OF VAULT =6.00' 30 MIL PVC 6" PERFORATED P.V.C. PIPE OR ADS CORRUGATED POLYTHENE PERFORATED UNDERDRAIN(W /SOCK)) LID ELEV =1.60' FILTER FABRIC COARSE AGGREGATE COARSE AGGREGATE ( #57 STONE) FILTER MEDIA TO BE WASHED SILICA SAND PER "FDOT ( #57 STONE) (WASHED) ROAD AND BRIDGE SPECIFICATIONS" (902 -4). (WASHED) UNIFORMITY COEFF. OF 1.5 OR GREATER, AND 10% DIAMETER EFFECTIVE GRAIN SZE OF .20 TO .55 MM. NO LIMEROCK IN ANY PORTION OF FILTERDRAIN ASSEMBLY FILTERDRAIN DETAIL FOR VAULT N.T.S. a a 5' -5" CIPL 5' -1" Precast PLAN 5'-5" CIPL Nor, J1' P Pte 5'-l' Precast 3CIPL i� - Al2 0.20 12" 8" 61-10' A6 r Grate 6" 13 -� " C/. y 0.20 Hon. wall Reinf. See Index 201 n (See Table 2 0.24 � ._ ! 0� *41B s �s N o Ctrs. 0 to c ao *4 Bars o 10 Ctrs. *4 Bars Precast SECTION o Il" Cfrs, .3 *4 Bars O 12' Ctrs. 11 SECTION ' HORIZONTAL WALL REINFORCING SCHEDULES ( TABLE J) YT INSIDE TOP OF VAULT =6.00' 30 MIL PVC 6" PERFORATED P.V.C. PIPE OR ADS CORRUGATED POLYTHENE PERFORATED UNDERDRAIN(W /SOCK)) LID ELEV =1.60' FILTER FABRIC COARSE AGGREGATE COARSE AGGREGATE ( #57 STONE) FILTER MEDIA TO BE WASHED SILICA SAND PER "FDOT ( #57 STONE) (WASHED) ROAD AND BRIDGE SPECIFICATIONS" (902 -4). (WASHED) UNIFORMITY COEFF. OF 1.5 OR GREATER, AND 10% DIAMETER EFFECTIVE GRAIN SZE OF .20 TO .55 MM. NO LIMEROCK IN ANY PORTION OF FILTERDRAIN ASSEMBLY FILTERDRAIN DETAIL FOR VAULT N.T.S. a a 5' -5" CIPL 5' -1" Precast PLAN 5'-5" CIPL AREA (In /ft J J1' P Pte 5'-l' Precast 3CIPL i� - Al2 0.20 12" 8" 61-10' A6 r Grate 6" 13 -� " C/. y 0.20 Hon. wall Reinf. See Index 201 n (See Table 2 0.24 � 5' *41B s c � N o Ctrs. 0 to c ao *4 Bars o 10 Ctrs. *4 Bars Precast SECTION o Il" Cfrs, HORIZONTAL WALL REINFORCING SCHEDULES ( TABLE 2 ) WALL DEPTH SCHEDULE AREA (In /ft J MAX. SPACING BARS WwF (14 Al2 0.20 12" 8" 61-10' A6 0.20 6" 5" 10'-13' A4 0.20 4" 3" 10' -15' 85.5 0.24 3' Cl. 5' WALL DEPTH rLAIV AREA (!n /ftJ 5q" CIPL 04' CIPL 5P, CIPL 4' -0" Precast �3' 3J' Precast- ,_ r Precast 0.20 r-- --9 -►1 Eye Bolt* 0' -7.5' A6 See Index 201 6" 5" 7.5'-10' B5.5 Grate ' S' 101-15' Harz. Wall Relnf. y :4. 61 3' Cl. (See Table 3) a h a 2 N c ao *4 Bars o 10 Ctrs. CIPL w (Short Bars) Precast .3 *4 Bars O 12' Ctrs. 11 SECTION ' HORIZONTAL WALL REINFORCING SCHEDULES ( TABLE J) WALL DEPTH SCHEDULE AREA (!n /ftJ MAX. SPACING BARS WWF 0' -5' Al2 0.20 /2' 8' 0' -7.5' A6 0.20 6" 5" 7.5'-10' B5.5 0.24 ' S' 101-15' C6.5 0.37 6 " 6" TYPE C TYPE D TYPE E Recommended Maximum Pipe Sizes Recommended Maximum Pipe Size, Recommended Maximum Pipe Size+ 2,-0" Wall - 18" Pipe " " 3' -I' Wall - 24' Pipe 31 -0" Wall - 24' Pipe 3 -! Wall - 24 Pipe f18 where ap 18 pipe • W 1/ 36" PI 4 -6 Wall - 36 Plpa DESIGNED THE SIGNATURE OF THE DUALITY CONTROL OFFICER IN THIS SPACE JD INDICATES THAT ALL REQUIRED i DRAWN PERMITS HAVE BEEN OBTAINED RD /JEB AND THAT CONSTRUCTION IS ' CHECKED AUTHORIZED TO COMMENCE. O.C. PARKING AREA I •- 4 ELEV =2.60' - ACCESS MANHOLE ACCESS MANHOLE - COVER (TYP) COVER (TYP) DHW2s =5.85' 0 SECTION A -A ACCESS GRATES (TYP) STRAIGHT CURB ELEV =5.45' SKIMMER enters a 2'-0 wall) 4 -I a - ice MAX. SPACING BARS WWF Ld l0' -l' CIPL 1 0.24 �� l01-I' CIPL 5' -10' D4.5 1 91-9" Precast 4JN v i 9' -9' Precast o 1 4V 4' 8' -9" 0 2� " 263 a C - 9 ° c F.B. S PG. D c w is .3 r 11 Groh ' BY OF 0 •1 r-- E Of Pipes 1 .0 ELEV =1.60' $M Eyebolt 11 a Pipe S 1 .. Of Grate See Index 20/ Hartz. Wall Reinf. � S ca ° 3" CL (See Table 5) �s :r 8' 8' -9" 1 8NI CIPL o y v *4 Bars tl 6' -9 1 6" 1 Precast N o 12" Ctrs. ((I�I�'''''''''''''''' 1 1. 2�a Cift PLAN Precast Precast *4 Bars o b' Ctrs. SECTION (Short Bars) 0 0 , TYPE H (4 -GRATE INLET) 000 c Recommended Maximum Pipe Sizes 3' -0" Wall - 24" Pipe 0 8'-9" Wall - 1 -78" Pipe E M Or 2 -30" Pipe (S =4' -31) id , DESIGNED THE SIGNATURE OF THE DUALITY CONTROL OFFICER IN THIS SPACE JD INDICATES THAT ALL REQUIRED i DRAWN PERMITS HAVE BEEN OBTAINED RD /JEB AND THAT CONSTRUCTION IS ' CHECKED AUTHORIZED TO COMMENCE. O.C. PARKING AREA I •- 4 ELEV =2.60' - ACCESS MANHOLE ACCESS MANHOLE - COVER (TYP) COVER (TYP) DHW2s =5.85' 0 SECTION A -A ACCESS GRATES (TYP) STRAIGHT CURB ELEV =5.45' SKIMMER SCHEDULE AREA (it," MAX. SPACING BARS WWF Ld 7_673-5--l-a-37 1 0.24 �� ; 5' -10' D4.5 1 'Y 4JN v i D4.5 o 1 4V 4' 0 RCP w �0U-1 263 a C - 9 ° c F.B. S PG. D c N t Q' .3 11 0 APP'D BY OF 0 •1 .0 ELEV =1.60' $M t. 11 ELEV =2.40' Of Grate es . e•} .t J . d. 59' PLAN VIEW STORMWATER TREATMENT VAULT DETAIL 0 7' -II" CIPL 7' -7' Precast 7'-fl' CIPL 7' -7" Precast 6' -7" � ! � Grate J� I` Eyebolt See Index 201 o° ', 3" C!. Horiz. Wall Relnf. c !j ;d (See Table 41 f N *4 Bars __ O 12" Ctrs. r SECTION *4 ears o 10" Ctrs. (Short Bars) HORIZONTAL WALL REINFORCING SCHEDULES (TABLE 4) HORIZONTAL WALL REINFORCING SCHEDULES (TABLE 5) WALL DEPTH SCHEDULE AREA (it," MAX. SPACING BARS WWF 0' -5' 7_673-5--l-a-37 1 0.24 3 5' -10' D4.5 1 0.53 4JN 1 4" i D4.5 1 0.53 1 4V 4' 0 Is 263 a C - 9 ° c F.B. S PG. J� c N t Q' .3 11 0 APP'D BY OF 0 •1 .0 $M t. 11 es . e•} .t J . d. 59' PLAN VIEW STORMWATER TREATMENT VAULT DETAIL 0 7' -II" CIPL 7' -7' Precast 7'-fl' CIPL 7' -7" Precast 6' -7" � ! � Grate J� I` Eyebolt See Index 201 o° ', 3" C!. Horiz. Wall Relnf. c !j ;d (See Table 41 f N *4 Bars __ O 12" Ctrs. r SECTION *4 ears o 10" Ctrs. (Short Bars) HORIZONTAL WALL REINFORCING SCHEDULES (TABLE 4) HORIZONTAL WALL REINFORCING SCHEDULES (TABLE 5) WALL DEPTH SCHEDULE AREA (it," MAX. SPACING BARS WWF 0' -5' 7_673-5--l-a-37 1 0.24 3 5' -10' D4.5 1 0.53 4JN 1 4" FL ®RIDA DESIGN CONSUL 'FA i�iS, INC. ENGINEERS, ENVIRONMENTALISTS, SURVEYORS 8 PLANNERS 3030 Starkey Blvd, New Port Richey FL 34655 Tel: (727) 849 -7588 - Fax: (727) 848 -3648 E.B. No. 7421 WALL DEPTH SCHEDULE AREA (!n /f11 MAX. SPACING BARS WWF 0' -5' 85.5 1 0.24 5J# 1 5" 5' -7' C6.5 1 0.37 1 Sim 6' 7' -15' D4.5 1 0.53 1 4V 4' TYPE H (2 & 3-GRATE INLET) Recommended Maximum Plpe Size* 3' -0" Wall - 24" Pipe 6' -7' Wall - 1-60' Plpe Or 2 -24' Plpe (S "3' -5 "1 2005 FDOT 0=!Gn Skadefd13 DITCH BOTTOM INLET TYPES C, D, E & H PREPARED FOR, GENERAL NOTES See Sheet 2 of 6. Let Ghoot No. fit ovoi/65 1 of o Ind*x No. 232 A ELEV =2.60' h , SECTION A -A NORMAL TYPE I CURB SECTION - SEE INDEX 101 SECTION B -B NOTE: Subject to City Engineer's approval. To be used only in unique situations. PLAN REV. I DATE I DESCRIPTION I APP. 0" Clearance Over Rivets -, 4 3 p ' -2' 3' -2 " Equal Spaces 2' -l�" 2,48 2'-l" Imo- 15 Equal Spaces 15 Equal Spaces If Straight Bars r r r 14 Straight Bars 14 Straight Bars 1 Typ. J 2 End - Bearing 2 End - Bearing 2 �� Band Band Band ! 7yp. ) _I s y tg, �X "_I rr Bond Band Band (ryp.) -"I �' - t' Clearance Over Rivets ( Typ. J TYPE C TYPE D TYPE E TYPE H (2 -GRATE INLET) TYPE H (4-GRATE INLET) Straight Bars 2'x #' Straight Bars 2'x4' r Straight Bars 2 "x #" Straight End-Bearing Bars 2'x J' r r Retlouline Bars I 'x �' Retloullne Bars I# x 1� Retlaullne Bars li x " Straight Bearing Bars 2'x4" straight End- Beorlrp Bars 2 x # Bands 2 "x #" Bands 2 "x #' Bands 2' x4' Retiouline Bars 14'x f ReticWg B Bars 1# x Approx. WeJpM 104 tbs. Approx. Weight l90 Las. Approx. Weight 215 Lbs. Bonding Bars 2" x #' Banding ears 2" x" Approx. Total Weight 310 Las. Approx. Total Weight 388 Las. STEEL GRATES NOTES Steel Grates Are Required On Inlets With Traversable Slots And On Inlets where Bloyole Trafflo Is Anticipahed. GENERAL NOTES 1. These Inlets are suitable for bicycle trafl7o and are to be used to ditches, medians and other J. Steel grates are to be used on all Inlets where bicycle traffic is anticipated. Steel grade 7. Traversable slots constructed In existing Inlets shall be paid for as Inlets partial. areas subject to infrequent traffic loadings but are not to be placed In areas subject to any are to be used on oil Inlets with traversable slots. Either cost Iron or steel grates may be For conversion work and method of payment see 'TRAVERSABLE SLOT INLETS heavy wheel loads. These Inlets may be placed In area subject to oaoaslonal pedestrian traffic used on Inlets without slots where bicycle traffic Is not anticipated. Either cost Iron or (PARTIAL) FAR EXISTING INLETS'. such as Jandsoaped areas and pavement areas where pedestrians can walk around the Inlet. steel grates may be used on all inlets with non - traversable slots. Subject to the selection described above, when Alternate G grate Is specified In the plans. either the steel grafe. 8. Sodding to ba used on all Inlets not located In paved areas and paid for under contract 2. Inlets subject to minimal debris should be constructed without slots. Where debris Is a hot dipped galvanized after fabrlootlon, or the cast Iron grate may be used, unless the concrete Inlet pavement unit price for Sodding, SY. problem Inlets should be constructed with slots. Slotted Inlets located within roadway plane atlpulote the particular type. clear zones and areas subject to bicycles and /or pedestrians shall have traversable slots. 9. For supplementary details see Index No. 201, The traversable slot modification Is not adaptable to Inlet Type H. Slots may be constructed 4. Recommended maximum pipe sizes shown are for concrete pipe. Size for other types of at either or both ends as shown an plans. pipe must be checked for fit. l0. All reinfidr�Ing Grade 60 bars with 2' min. cover unless otherwise noted. Bars to be oat or bent for J�" clearance around pipe opening. Provide one additional *4 bar above and 5. All exposed corners and edges of concrete are to be chamfered ;i ". at each sll�de of pipe opening. 6. Concrete Inlet pavement to be used on Inlets without slots and Inlets with non - traversable slots only when called for In the plans, but required on all traversable slot Inlets. Cost to be Included In omtraet unit price for Inlets. Ouontitles shown are for Information only. 2M FDOT 0=10 SlMards Ohm No. DITCH BOTTOM INLET o�roiro5 2 . of 6 TYPES C, D, E & H 1232 R.J. HEISENBOTTLE ARCHITECTS, P.A. 2199 PONCE DE* LEON BOULEVARD, SUITE 400 CORAL GABLES, FLORIDA 33134 PHONE: (305) 446 -7799 FAX: (305) 446 -9275 SHEET DESCRIPTION BELLEVIEW BILTMORE CABANA CLUB SITE PLAN PAVING, GRADING AND DRAINAGE DETAILS 2' -8" \ : 1:: =I I \5_0 Continuous \ N I� c�rn-rlr��I n n CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA PUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATION ENGINEERING R m_(2 o o BY CONCRETE SWALE 92 CHECKED BY DETAIL I INDEX NO. 1 OF 1 0 U c N 'It� yI 11 5a f+ar C 0 {{ p Z!-4` �` i a X . 9 ;" 7 PERM %TTEDON INLETETYPED • f r a) • ir''' / 6.6 '" I 2� r2i "� "'2"007-25A 0 263 a C - 9 ° c F.B. S PG. SHT. N t Q' .3 11 0 APP'D BY OF 0 .0 $M 11 Of Grate � ca 0 C �s M U FI � ��IAAA.AI ((I�I�'''''''''''''''' IIII n 4» 0 0 , 000 c 0 E M �^�� ►I id , / • 1��- _t_ Ilfr ►11„a l# 2' �� 1 1 6� -6r -I 8'.8a re _I C HALF SECTION CAST IRON GRATES 0 TYPE C TYPE E TYPE H (3-GRATE INLET) TYPE H (4-GRATE INLET) Approx. Weight 235 Lbs. Approx. Weight 465 Lbs. Approx. weight 725 Lbs. Approx. Weight 961' Lbs. c CAST IRON GRATES 0" Clearance Over Rivets -, 4 3 p ' -2' 3' -2 " Equal Spaces 2' -l�" 2,48 2'-l" Imo- 15 Equal Spaces 15 Equal Spaces If Straight Bars r r r 14 Straight Bars 14 Straight Bars 1 Typ. J 2 End - Bearing 2 End - Bearing 2 �� Band Band Band ! 7yp. ) _I s y tg, �X "_I rr Bond Band Band (ryp.) -"I �' - t' Clearance Over Rivets ( Typ. J TYPE C TYPE D TYPE E TYPE H (2 -GRATE INLET) TYPE H (4-GRATE INLET) Straight Bars 2'x #' Straight Bars 2'x4' r Straight Bars 2 "x #" Straight End-Bearing Bars 2'x J' r r Retlouline Bars I 'x �' Retloullne Bars I# x 1� Retlaullne Bars li x " Straight Bearing Bars 2'x4" straight End- Beorlrp Bars 2 x # Bands 2 "x #" Bands 2 "x #' Bands 2' x4' Retiouline Bars 14'x f ReticWg B Bars 1# x Approx. WeJpM 104 tbs. Approx. Weight l90 Las. Approx. Weight 215 Lbs. Bonding Bars 2" x #' Banding ears 2" x" Approx. Total Weight 310 Las. Approx. Total Weight 388 Las. STEEL GRATES NOTES Steel Grates Are Required On Inlets With Traversable Slots And On Inlets where Bloyole Trafflo Is Anticipahed. GENERAL NOTES 1. These Inlets are suitable for bicycle trafl7o and are to be used to ditches, medians and other J. Steel grates are to be used on all Inlets where bicycle traffic is anticipated. Steel grade 7. Traversable slots constructed In existing Inlets shall be paid for as Inlets partial. areas subject to infrequent traffic loadings but are not to be placed In areas subject to any are to be used on oil Inlets with traversable slots. Either cost Iron or steel grates may be For conversion work and method of payment see 'TRAVERSABLE SLOT INLETS heavy wheel loads. These Inlets may be placed In area subject to oaoaslonal pedestrian traffic used on Inlets without slots where bicycle traffic Is not anticipated. Either cost Iron or (PARTIAL) FAR EXISTING INLETS'. such as Jandsoaped areas and pavement areas where pedestrians can walk around the Inlet. steel grates may be used on all inlets with non - traversable slots. Subject to the selection described above, when Alternate G grate Is specified In the plans. either the steel grafe. 8. Sodding to ba used on all Inlets not located In paved areas and paid for under contract 2. Inlets subject to minimal debris should be constructed without slots. Where debris Is a hot dipped galvanized after fabrlootlon, or the cast Iron grate may be used, unless the concrete Inlet pavement unit price for Sodding, SY. problem Inlets should be constructed with slots. Slotted Inlets located within roadway plane atlpulote the particular type. clear zones and areas subject to bicycles and /or pedestrians shall have traversable slots. 9. For supplementary details see Index No. 201, The traversable slot modification Is not adaptable to Inlet Type H. Slots may be constructed 4. Recommended maximum pipe sizes shown are for concrete pipe. Size for other types of at either or both ends as shown an plans. pipe must be checked for fit. l0. All reinfidr�Ing Grade 60 bars with 2' min. cover unless otherwise noted. Bars to be oat or bent for J�" clearance around pipe opening. Provide one additional *4 bar above and 5. All exposed corners and edges of concrete are to be chamfered ;i ". at each sll�de of pipe opening. 6. Concrete Inlet pavement to be used on Inlets without slots and Inlets with non - traversable slots only when called for In the plans, but required on all traversable slot Inlets. Cost to be Included In omtraet unit price for Inlets. Ouontitles shown are for Information only. 2M FDOT 0=10 SlMards Ohm No. DITCH BOTTOM INLET o�roiro5 2 . of 6 TYPES C, D, E & H 1232 R.J. HEISENBOTTLE ARCHITECTS, P.A. 2199 PONCE DE* LEON BOULEVARD, SUITE 400 CORAL GABLES, FLORIDA 33134 PHONE: (305) 446 -7799 FAX: (305) 446 -9275 SHEET DESCRIPTION BELLEVIEW BILTMORE CABANA CLUB SITE PLAN PAVING, GRADING AND DRAINAGE DETAILS 2' -8" \ : 1:: =I I \5_0 Continuous \ N I� c�rn-rlr��I n n CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA PUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATION ENGINEERING R m_(2 o o BY CONCRETE SWALE 92 CHECKED BY DETAIL I INDEX NO. 1 OF 1 0 c 47E L 1 6/11/08 REVISED STORM VAULT DETAIL; ADDED DETAIL #108 PER C.O.C. DRC COMMENTS (5/1/08) NO. DATE REVISIONS U c c C 0 {{ p O .N '- 0 • f r a) • rn JOB No. "'2"007-25A 0 263 a C - 9 ° c F.B. S PG. SHT. N t Q' .3 11 0 APP'D BY OF 0 .0 ca 0 C �s U 4» 0 0 c 0 E a Q U C 0 U c c 47E L 1 6/11/08 REVISED STORM VAULT DETAIL; ADDED DETAIL #108 PER C.O.C. DRC COMMENTS (5/1/08) NO. DATE REVISIONS U c vi C 0 {{ p '- 0 • f r a) • ° JOB No. "'2"007-25A o 0 263 C - 9 ° ' F.B. S PG. SHT. N t Q' DATE. 1/31/08 11 0 APP'D BY OF U O When Valve Occur set Base on 10 —c TYPICAL VALVE SETTING n. s. Mech. Joint Valve—/ C I CV c .o 0 Q) > 0 Q 0 n. a> 0 Water Main Restraining Joint CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA PUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATION ENGINEERING REDB.V.D. R BY TYPICAL VALVE 01 DATE <. CHECKED BY SETTING 1ND402o' DESIGNED BY CROSS— SECTION REV. DATE DESCRIP710N APP. G.O.H. 1 OF 4 SERVICE CONNECTION DETAIL NOTES: 1. WATER MAINS TO BE ON NORTH or EAST SIDE OF R.O.W., APPROX. 4 FT. BACK OF CURB UNLESS OTHERWISE AUTHORIZED BY CITY ENGINEER. 2. SERVICE CONNECTIONS TO BE 2 FT. FROM SIDE LOT LINE ON EITHER SIDE OF LOT (SEE SHEET NO. 3). THESE SERVICES TO BE CONSISTENT WITHIN THE SUBDIVISION. DRIVEWAYS SHALL NOT BE BUILT OVER METERS. 3. ALL LINES SHALL BE CHLORINATED AND PRESSURE TESTED (TEST FOR ONE HOUR @ 150 P.S.I.) UNDER THE DIRECTION OF THE UTILITIES DEPARTMENT. AFTER SUCCESSFUL COMPLETION OF THE TESTING AND CHLORINATION, THE PRESSURE SHALL REMAIN ON THE SYSTEM AT ALL TIMES. 4. TEN FT. SEPARATION REQUIRED BETWEEN PARALLEL WATER & SANITARY SEWER LINES. ,&5. SADDLE IS REQUIRED FOR ALL SERVICE CONNECTIONS TO MAINS. 6. MINIMUM DISTANCE BETWEEN SERVICE TAPS TO BE NOT LESS THAN 36 ". A A Threaded Corporation Stop Curb Stop MUELLER B -25008 f MUELL -i=R H24350 or Ford or approved equal 843-- '7 with Lock Wing and (Tap at 45° Angle) Compr-ession inlet (3/4" or 1" use meter swivel nut, 1-1/2" or 2" use FIP outlet) or approved equal A Water Service Tubing Driscopipe 5100 or Endot /Yardley - 'x; Blue Jet, SDR 9, 3408 Polyethylene Dlron service saddle Ford FC 202 series CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA W /stainless steel band REV. CURB STOP, CORP PUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATION Water Main 3Q 5/9/05 STOP, SADDLE NOTES R.F. ENGINEERING and epoxy coated REDRAWN BY 3/29/05 Chg. Service Saddle R.S.F. ductile iron body Or REV WATER SERVICE CHECKED BY WATER MAIN SERVICE Qi tz /z2 /sa TUBING TYPE GCH L.M.M. CONNECTION DETAIL approved equal. REV. DATE DESCRIPTION qpp, DESIGNED BY R.S.F. DUCTILE IRON PIPE RESTRAINT THE FOLLOWING JOINTS MUST BE RESTRAINED IN ALL APPLICATIONS: 1. BEND — INLET AND OUTLET 2. TEE — ALL BRANCHES 3. OFFSETS — INLET AND OUTLET 4. CAPS 5. PLUGS 6. DEAD ENDS 7. HYDRANT RUNOUTS SHALL BE RESTRAINED AS DEAD ENDS Restraining Gasket (Typ.) � L � Thrust Restraint (Typ.) ON ALL TEES, A MINIMUM OF 5' SHALL BE RESTRAINED ON EACH RUN LEG. L = MINIMUM LENGTH TO BE RESTRAINED ON EACH SIDE OF FITTING (ft.) = CONTACT ENGINEER FOR VALUES FIGURES BASED ON 30" BURY DEPTH, 150 PSI TEST PRESSURE E FIGURES DON'T APPLY TO POLY WRAPPED PIPE o o I o. M 0 o N C I a D 0 I NOM. SIZE ELBOWS (deg.) VALVE TEES BRANCH DEAD END 11.25' 22.50' 45' 90� L 4 2 3 7 17 18 30 6 2 5 10 23 30 42 8 3 6 12 30 42 54 12 4 8 17 42c 76 16 5 10 22 53 O.G. 97 20 6 13 26 63 117 1 OF 3 NOTE: THRUST RESTRAINT ON SLIPJOINT DUCTILE IRON PIPE SHALL BE U.S. PIPE FIELD LOCK GASKETS FOR TYTON JOINT PIPE or AMERICAN FAST —GRIP GASKETS FOR AMERICAN FASTITE PIPE. THRUST RESTRAINT ON DUCTILE IRON FITTINGS SHALL BE PROVIDED BY THE USE OF MEGALUG RETAINERS AND MECHANICAL JOINT FITTINGS. CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA PUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATION ENGINEERING REDRAWN BY ATE B.V.D. 9 02 c A 6/03 REV. LENGTH TABLE GLB CHECKED BY THRUST INDEX NO DESIGNED BY RESTRAINING REV. DATE DESCRIPTION APP. r 2 OF 2 N c I � DESIGNED THE SIGNATURE OF THE QUALITY CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT C u rn CONTROL OFFICER IN THIS SPACE E JD INDICATES THAT ALL REQUIRED IDA1 01 15 92 DRAWN _ - v PERMITS HAVE BEEN OBTAINED FL ®RID o RD /JEB AND THAT CONSTRUCTION IS ENGINE REV. AUTHORIZED TO COMMENCE. DESCRIPTION CHECKED P° DESCRIPTION 2 OF 4 - O 1 OF 2 PREPARED FOR, Oc R.J. HEISENBOTTLE ARCHITECTS, P.A. N BELLEVIEW BILTMORE CABANA CLUB 2199 PONCE DE LEON BOULEVARD, SUITE 400 CORAL GABLES, FLORIDA 33134 O.G. SITE PLAN PHONE: (305) 446 -7799 FAX: (305) 446 -9275 UTILITY DETAILS Y — A DESIGN CONSUL TANTS, INC. ERS, ENVIRONMENTALISTS, SURVEYORS 8 PLANNERS 3030 Starkey Blvd, New Port Richey FL 34655 Tel: (727) 849 -7588 - Fax: (727) 848 -3648 E.B. No. 7421 a� c 3 L TYPICAL EIRE HYDRANT SETTING n.t.s. T Max. 15' — Min. 4' 18" Min. , 24" Max. Distance Varies I —Valve Box Back of Curb or ( Mech. Joint Valve ONLY APPROVED A Kennedy Guardian No. K -81 D i Muller Centurion No. A -423 U.S. Pipe Metropolitan NOTES: I I Restraining Joint (Typ.) 1. Steamer Connection to Face Street. 2. All Fire Hydrants to have 5 1/4" Valve Seat. 3. Fire Hydrants Shall be Placed at Street Corners or in the R.O.W. Adjacent to Side Lot Lines Whenever Possible. 4. See Sheet 3 for Typical Connections & Fittings. c I � CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA PUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATION ENGINEERING _ CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT N rn Back of Curb or ( Mech. Joint Valve ONLY APPROVED A Kennedy Guardian No. K -81 D i Muller Centurion No. A -423 U.S. Pipe Metropolitan NOTES: I I Restraining Joint (Typ.) 1. Steamer Connection to Face Street. 2. All Fire Hydrants to have 5 1/4" Valve Seat. 3. Fire Hydrants Shall be Placed at Street Corners or in the R.O.W. Adjacent to Side Lot Lines Whenever Possible. 4. See Sheet 3 for Typical Connections & Fittings. TYPICAL HYDRANT SETTING Connecting Piece w /integrally cast Mech. Joint Gland on one End —D.I. Rotatable Mech. Joint Gland on Other End. Valve and Hydrant Tee w /D.I. Rotatable Mech. Joint Gland on Plain End Branch. NOTES: 1. On Hydrants Requiring Runout Last Two Joints Must Be Restrained Per Detail 403 (2 of 2). 0 CLEANOUT PLUG CHARLOTTE Pipe And Foundry Company Part No. 106 Or Equal Fire Hydrant Assembly (TYPO Length Varies (See Note 1) Mech. Joint Valve REV. I DATE I DESCRIPTION I APP. Water Main CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA PUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATION ENGINEERING IBY TYPICAL HYDRANT 0 715 BY SETTING INDEX NO. PLAN VIEW BY 3OF4 See NOTE For Traffic Bearing Cover. Concrete Pad 8" Thick x 1' -6" Sq. A TWO —WAY CLEANOUT CHARLOTTE Pipe And FOL Part No. 448 Or Equal IL FEMALE ADAPTER CHARLOTTE Pipe And Foundry Company D-,+ Air, 1n1 nr C -I Lateral - DETAIL 4" F BLOWOFF DETAIL n.t.s. All "' -' -- Maximum D Tapped Plug END CONNECTION Qj I 4/05 I Add Notes I LM REV. DATE DESCRIPTION qpp, )FF 2" Ball Val, Hose Bibb — 3/4" Golvan 2" Galva 2" Corporal Tapping Sad h CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA PUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATION ENGINEERING BY iY BLOWOFF 0 I DETAIL TOP CONNECTION 1 OF 1 CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA PUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATION ENGINEERING REDRAWN BY TEMP BLOWOFF 06D24 CHECKED BY AND INDEX 80. . DES 408 SAMPLE TAP REV, DATE DESCRIPTION APP 2 OF 2 Stnn I PqS C;hprlk MUELLE1 Compre: Threaded Co MUELLER H1 or approved ( TAP AT 4' Saddle required 4" P.V.C. only 0 Iron service saddle Ford FC 202 series w /stainless steel band or approved equal. CHLORINATION TAP 0' NOTE: Cleanout Plug over To Be 9 U.S. Foundry 7623 Or Equal. _.. 0 CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA PUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATION ENGINEERING _ CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 3 rn REDRAWN BY B.V.D. TYPICAL HYDRANT' IDA1 01 15 92 1 9/04 Revised Note G.L.B. GHQ H Y SETTING IN 4020, CROSS— SECTION REV. DATE DESCRIPTION APP. DESIGNED BY T.C.J. DESCRIPTION 2 OF 4 TYPICAL HYDRANT SETTING Connecting Piece w /integrally cast Mech. Joint Gland on one End —D.I. Rotatable Mech. Joint Gland on Other End. Valve and Hydrant Tee w /D.I. Rotatable Mech. Joint Gland on Plain End Branch. NOTES: 1. On Hydrants Requiring Runout Last Two Joints Must Be Restrained Per Detail 403 (2 of 2). 0 CLEANOUT PLUG CHARLOTTE Pipe And Foundry Company Part No. 106 Or Equal Fire Hydrant Assembly (TYPO Length Varies (See Note 1) Mech. Joint Valve REV. I DATE I DESCRIPTION I APP. Water Main CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA PUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATION ENGINEERING IBY TYPICAL HYDRANT 0 715 BY SETTING INDEX NO. PLAN VIEW BY 3OF4 See NOTE For Traffic Bearing Cover. Concrete Pad 8" Thick x 1' -6" Sq. A TWO —WAY CLEANOUT CHARLOTTE Pipe And FOL Part No. 448 Or Equal IL FEMALE ADAPTER CHARLOTTE Pipe And Foundry Company D-,+ Air, 1n1 nr C -I Lateral - DETAIL 4" F BLOWOFF DETAIL n.t.s. All "' -' -- Maximum D Tapped Plug END CONNECTION Qj I 4/05 I Add Notes I LM REV. DATE DESCRIPTION qpp, )FF 2" Ball Val, Hose Bibb — 3/4" Golvan 2" Galva 2" Corporal Tapping Sad h CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA PUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATION ENGINEERING BY iY BLOWOFF 0 I DETAIL TOP CONNECTION 1 OF 1 CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA PUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATION ENGINEERING REDRAWN BY TEMP BLOWOFF 06D24 CHECKED BY AND INDEX 80. . DES 408 SAMPLE TAP REV, DATE DESCRIPTION APP 2 OF 2 Stnn I PqS C;hprlk MUELLE1 Compre: Threaded Co MUELLER H1 or approved ( TAP AT 4' Saddle required 4" P.V.C. only 0 Iron service saddle Ford FC 202 series w /stainless steel band or approved equal. CHLORINATION TAP 0' NOTE: Cleanout Plug over To Be 9 U.S. Foundry 7623 Or Equal. _.. 0 _ CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 3 rn 0 REDRAWN BY BY CHECKED BY W• APPROVED EO 8Y T.C.J. STANDARD 11 DO 95 01 3/04 Revised Per Utllltles R.S.F. CLEAN OUT INDEX NO. 304 (Sanitary) REV. DATE DESCRIPTION APP 0 1 OF 2 PREPARED FOR, SHEET DESCRIPTION, R.J. HEISENBOTTLE ARCHITECTS, P.A. E BELLEVIEW BILTMORE CABANA CLUB 2199 PONCE DE LEON BOULEVARD, SUITE 400 CORAL GABLES, FLORIDA 33134 SITE PLAN PHONE: (305) 446 -7799 FAX: (305) 446 -9275 UTILITY DETAILS V 3/29/05 1 Chg. Service Saddle R.S.F. 10 8/7/95 Chg. Service Tubing type G.C.H. REV. DATE DESCRIPTION APP, N0, I DATE 9 Endot /Yardley x-08 Polyethylene CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA PUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATION ENGINEERING YCHLORINATION TAP 4C, REVISIONS 1 OF 2 C 0 E a _.. 0 _ cz� 3 rn 0 =- 7 Q) o Q) W 0 C a E a 0 U 0 U C v c of aP �M W - ryT C` iS cr 0 l_ 0 U vi C U 0) I 5 JOB N0. -p 2007 -25A o EPN 263 00 CO C -10 0, F.B. B PG. SHT. L rn DATE. 1 /31 /08 11 APP'D aF BY O i PLAN See Index No. 301 11 Varies i Q R Clay Brick Masonry 1/2" Cement Plaster Bottom Of a Corbel 8 In Joint g" :4 e Entry 12" D >ical > 12' a: -� 0 0 :o „E„ a 00 0 :4 L ,;0 6 "-- NQ •:o.•. tom a;•: : a :o: ::::• ;:a:;:4 >, G„ SECTION A -A Crown of drop pipe shall match crown of outfall pipe for outfall pipes of 10" or larger. NOTES: 1. All concrete to be 3000 p.s.i. with fiber mesh reinforcing. 2. P.V.C. pipe entry requires manhole adapter coupling by Flo Control Inc., or approved water stop coupling. 3. Manholes shall have a water proof Bituminous Coating on the exterior & interior, Koppers bitumastic black solution 300M, or Proco EP -214. RING - HALF PLAN N L 0 36" 23" > 21 " ! Machined Surface A B C D E F G Shallow 0'- 4' 2' -6" 3/04 4' Max 3' -6" 24" Max 8" ¢#3 at 12" E. W. Standard 4.1'- 6' 3' -6" BRICK MASONRY 6' Max 4' 30" Max 8" ##5 at 10" E. W. Deep 6.1'- 10' 3' -6" 7' 10' 4' 36" Max 12" ##5 at 10" E. W. Deep 10.1'- 14 3' -6" 7' 14' 5' 36" Max 12" ##5 at 10" E. W. NOTES: 1. All concrete to be 3000 p.s.i. with fiber mesh reinforcing. 2. P.V.C. pipe entry requires manhole adapter coupling by Flo Control Inc., or approved water stop coupling. 3. Manholes shall have a water proof Bituminous Coating on the exterior & interior, Koppers bitumastic black solution 300M, or Proco EP -214. RING - HALF PLAN N L 0 36" 23" > 21 " ! Machined Surface I 0) L 0 t\ RING - SECTION Minimum Weight 7" 232 lbs. 9" 278 lbs. NOTES 1. Where roadway base is 8" or thicker use 9" ring, all other cases 7" ring is permissible. 2. Manufacturers model of storm ring and cover to be approved by City Engineer. STREET WITH CURB ❑ ❑ ❑ SANITARY ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ S E W E R Non Skid Required ❑ El El 171 11 Pattern Required SOLID COVER M N I L 22 -3/4 � I o Machined Surface SOLID COVER SECTION Minimum Weight 128 lbs. CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT REDRAWN BY DATE Novo 8/9 1 9/25/96 Deleted Sheets 2 & 3 yy,�,S, CHECKED BY SANITARY SEWER INDEX NO. Wes MANHOLE COVER Sot REV. DATE DESCRIPTION APP. DEISIGNRD BY 1 OF 2 STREET WITHOUT CURB (Size Varies) Iron Pipe Gaskets (typ) 0 E 0 E NOTES a 1. All pipe thru casing to be ® ductile iron. Co ° 2. All pipes within casing to be restrained by restraining gaskets. 3. Casing pipe to meet F,D.O,T, 1 standards. CD V 4. Jack and bore or directional drill 0 (No open cut) 0 M 1 N NOTES &PIPE DESC. CCH CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA c ° a DESIGNED THE SIGNATURE OF THE QUALITY 2 3/04 ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT - VI E © 7/28/05 Removed Brlck L.M. RE Novo BY BRICK MASONRY DATE AND THAT CONSTRUCTION IS 2 AUTHORIZED TO COMMENCE. CHECKED _ CHtEcKE: BY MANHOLE DETAIL I "3o2NO, DESIGNED BY R.S.F. 1 a /s /oz Rev. Notes R.G. bearing capacity ®bedding elevation. SANITARY SEWER / REV. DATE DESCRIPTION APP, DESIGNED BY D.C.B. OUTSIDE DROP 1 OF 3 Pick Hole C° 4 Required INSPECTION TEE TYP. TE iv I 0) L 0 t\ RING - SECTION Minimum Weight 7" 232 lbs. 9" 278 lbs. NOTES 1. Where roadway base is 8" or thicker use 9" ring, all other cases 7" ring is permissible. 2. Manufacturers model of storm ring and cover to be approved by City Engineer. STREET WITH CURB ❑ ❑ ❑ SANITARY ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ S E W E R Non Skid Required ❑ El El 171 11 Pattern Required SOLID COVER M N I L 22 -3/4 � I o Machined Surface SOLID COVER SECTION Minimum Weight 128 lbs. CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT REDRAWN BY DATE Novo 8/9 1 9/25/96 Deleted Sheets 2 & 3 yy,�,S, CHECKED BY SANITARY SEWER INDEX NO. Wes MANHOLE COVER Sot REV. DATE DESCRIPTION APP. DEISIGNRD BY 1 OF 2 STREET WITHOUT CURB (Size Varies) Iron Pipe Gaskets (typ) 0 E 0 E NOTES a 1. All pipe thru casing to be ® ductile iron. Co ° 2. All pipes within casing to be restrained by restraining gaskets. 3. Casing pipe to meet F,D.O,T, 1 standards. CD V 4. Jack and bore or directional drill 0 (No open cut) 0 M 1 N NOTES &PIPE DESC. CCH CHECKED BY G.C.H c ° a DESIGNED THE SIGNATURE OF THE QUALITY 2 3/04 CONTROL OFFICER IN THIS SPACE - VI E JD INDICATES THAT ALL REOUIRED DRAWN Q PERMITS HAVE BEEN OBTAINED o RD /JEB AND THAT CONSTRUCTION IS 2 AUTHORIZED TO COMMENCE. CHECKED _ DATE I DESCRIPTION 0 DESIGNED BY R.S.F. Ct oc bearing capacity ®bedding elevation. / `1 CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA PUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATION ENGINEERING REDRAWN BY DATE B. V.D. 1/90 ENGINEERS, ENVIRONMENTALISTS, SURVEYORS & PLANNERS 3030 Starkey Blvd, New Port Richey FL 34655 Tel: (727) 849 -7588 - Fax: (727) 848 -3648 E.B. No. 7421 Finish grade to allow 0.4' min., 1,0' max. fall from property line to back of curb. Minimum 36" Behind Back Of Curb Or Edge of Pavement �36' sidewalk cleanout 0 Double -Sweep Tee l SECTION _ CITY OWNED AND MAINTAINEI ervice Lateral R/W 30 " -36" or as Directed by the City Engineer HOMEOWNER OWNED AND MAINTAINED ANY VARIANCE MUST HAVE WRITTEN APPROVAL OF THE CITY ENGINEER. 1 2/95 NOTES &PIPE DESC. CCH CHECKED BY G.C.H JACK AND BORE D INDEX NO. 407 2 3/04 REV. DATE DESCRIPTION APP. DESIGNED BY G.C.H. Q 7/03 1 OF 1 FLORIDA DESIGN CONSUL TANTS, INC. ENGINEERS, ENVIRONMENTALISTS, SURVEYORS & PLANNERS 3030 Starkey Blvd, New Port Richey FL 34655 Tel: (727) 849 -7588 - Fax: (727) 848 -3648 E.B. No. 7421 Finish grade to allow 0.4' min., 1,0' max. fall from property line to back of curb. Minimum 36" Behind Back Of Curb Or Edge of Pavement �36' sidewalk cleanout 0 Double -Sweep Tee l SECTION _ CITY OWNED AND MAINTAINEI ervice Lateral R/W 30 " -36" or as Directed by the City Engineer HOMEOWNER OWNED AND MAINTAINED ANY VARIANCE MUST HAVE WRITTEN APPROVAL OF THE CITY ENGINEER. INTERCEPTOR CELL SIZING CHART GALLON CAPACITY CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA PUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATION ENGINEERING B C D E 2 3/04 Revised Per Utilities 7' -0" RED KIn BY STREET LATERAL 10 jjE 02 Q 7/03 Move C.O. Into R/W 4' -2" CHECKED BY DETAIL INDEX 3o50 5' -0" REV. DATE I DESCRIPTION APP, DESIGNED BY R.S.F. 1 OF 3 INTERCEPTOR CELL SIZING CHART GALLON CAPACITY A B C D E 750 7' -0' 4' -8' 7' -0" 4' -3" T -11' 1000 9' -0" 5' -0" 7' -2" 4' -2" 3' -10" 1250 9' -0" 5' -0" V -2' 5' -2" 4' -10" OUTLET General Notes: 1. The interceptor system may consist of multiple interceptor cells, if required greater than 1250 gallon capacity. 2. One sampling cell per system shall be installed at outfall to main. Z /�.. ..��. nil niln �nLin nnnoiAnrn� inn ON ALL TEES, A MINIMUM OF 5' RESTRAINED ON EACH RUN LEG L = MINIMUM LENGTH TO BE RESTRAINED ON EACH SIDE OF FITTING (ft.) FIGURES BASED ON 30" DEPTH BURY, 150 PSI TEST PRESSURE. 8" PVC MAXIMUM SIZE USED IN SYSTEM P.V.C. PIPE RESTRAINT THE FOLLOWING JOINTS MUST BE RESTRAINED IN ALL APPLICATIONS: 1. BEND - INLET AND OUTLET 2, TEE - OUTLET BRANCH 3. OFFSETS - INLET AND OUTLET 4. CAPS 5. PLUGS 6. DEAD ENDS 7. HYDRANT RUNOUTS SHALL BE RESTRAINED AS DEAD ENDS L � Megalug Restrainer (Typ,) NOM. PIPE SIZE INTERCEPTOR CELL SAMPLING CELL "' "" "�'�•� " "7 `- water -oil mix. =11.25 2.50 PLAN VIEW LOCKING FRAME & COVER 4. Contractor to supply & install all piping and 2 VENT PIPES TOP OF COVER TO MATCH AIR & GAS TIGHT sanitary tee's, clean -outs for cleaning toward and 46 opnoNAL EXISTING GRADE/PAVING 6 OR LARGER away from interceptor (alternate dual sweep 29 47 WHERE APPLICABLE 8 clean- outs). 8 1. 38 66 5. Contractor shall assure 2,500 PSI minimum soil bearing capacity ®bedding elevation. INSPECTION TEE TYP. TE iv OUTLET TO SANITARY 1. Concrete: 4500psi ® 28 day. INLET SEWER MAIN 2• Rebar: ASTM A615 Grade 60. T 3. Mesh: ASTM A815 Grade 65. = 4. Design: ACI3 18 -83 Building Code ASTM C857 Minimum Structural Design Loading for Underground c Precast Concrete Utility Structures 5. Loads: H -20 truck wheels w /30% impact per AASHTO. E PRECAST BAFFLE 4" THICK D 6. Fill w /clean water prior to start up of system. T 7. Gray water only, black water shall be r. carried by separate sewer. T 1 CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT LENGTH LENGTH REDRAWN BY DATE INTERCEPTOR CELL SAMPLING CELL E.A. 01/02 CHECKED BY GREASE INTERCEPTOR INDEX NO. Q SECTION VIEW D. 750 -1250 GALLON 307 DESIGNED BY i OF 1 ON ALL TEES, A MINIMUM OF 5' RESTRAINED ON EACH RUN LEG L = MINIMUM LENGTH TO BE RESTRAINED ON EACH SIDE OF FITTING (ft.) FIGURES BASED ON 30" DEPTH BURY, 150 PSI TEST PRESSURE. 8" PVC MAXIMUM SIZE USED IN SYSTEM P.V.C. PIPE RESTRAINT THE FOLLOWING JOINTS MUST BE RESTRAINED IN ALL APPLICATIONS: 1. BEND - INLET AND OUTLET 2, TEE - OUTLET BRANCH 3. OFFSETS - INLET AND OUTLET 4. CAPS 5. PLUGS 6. DEAD ENDS 7. HYDRANT RUNOUTS SHALL BE RESTRAINED AS DEAD ENDS L � Megalug Restrainer (Typ,) NOM. PIPE SIZE ELBOWS (deg.) VALVE TEES BRANCH DEAD END =11.25 2.50 45 90 4 2 4 9 21 28 46 6 3 6 12 29 47 65 8 4 8 16 38 66 85 � I PREPARED FOR, NOTE: THRUST RESTRAINT AT FITTINGS AND VALVES SHALL BE BY USE OF EBBA IRON MEGALUG RESTRAINERS. THRUST RESTRAINT BETWEEN PIPE JOINTS SHALL BE BY EBBA IRON SERIES 1500 RESTRAINERS. REV. I DATE I DESCRIPTION I APP. R.J. HEISENBOTTLE ARCHITECTS, P.A. 2199 PONCE DE LEON BOULEVARD, SUITE 400 CORAL GABLES, FLORIDA 33134 PHONE: (305) 446 -7799 FAX: (305) 446 -9275 CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA PUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATION ENGINEERING REDRAWN BY DATE B.V. D 19/02/99 WM w J w o TEE 9� GV BACKFLOW PREVENTOR DEVICE AS REQUIRED BY CITY STANDARD DETAILS GV TYPICAL FIRE LINE EXISTING PAVEMENT--J EXISTING ROAD BASE NOTE,: 1. TRENCHES LOCATED UNDER PAVEMENT SHALL BE COMPACTED TO 100% OF MAXIMUN DENSITY BY A.A.S.H.T.O. T -99, METHOD C. 2. TRENCHES NOT LOCATED UNDER PAVEMENT SHALL BE COMPACTED TO A FIRMNESS EQUAL TO THAT OF THE SOIL ADJACENT TO THE TRENCH, 3. REPLACEMENT OF PAVED SURFACES SHALL BE MADE IN ACCORDANCE TO APPLICABLE LOCAL REGULATIONS. THE CONTRACTOR IS TO INSTALL A DUCTILE IRON (DIP) FIRE LINE TO THE LOCATION OF THE BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY, CITY CODE REQUIRES THE INSTALLATION OF ONE JOINT OF DUCTILE IRON PIPE (DIP) ON THE SERVICE SIDE. THE CONTRACTOR IS TO COORDINATE THIS INSTALLATION WITH CITY PERSONNEL. SEE PLANS FOR FIRE LINE SIZE. RESTRAINING 1 OF 2 SHEET DESCRIPTION: BELLEVIEW BILTMORE CABANA CLUB SITE PLAN I-NJ UTILITY DETAILS 6/11/08 ADDED DETAIL NO. DATE WATER MAIN STING GRADE COMPACT IN 12" LAYERS 7� 12" ABOVE PIPE COMPACT IN 6" LAYERS COMPACT IN �3" LAYERS 12" PIPE 12° DIA, TRENCH BACKFILL DETAIL NTS c O_ N to E iv a c 3 V- o •.} t C= f 0 0 V) 0 0 c 0 E o_ U c O U C 0 N o 0 3 N 0 } +' o r'* " r C W •' ° .tdB ENO. 'a y� EPN• 263 00 F.B. B PG. C-11 O SHT, AND #307 PER C.O.C. DRC COMMENTS (5/1/08) DATE. d REVISIONS A6Y'D 1/31 /08 OF 11 U O v� S89'5060,� G D5(D5) V v� ) 8 STORY MAS OF SEAEWALL / W/ 1 STORY PAR CAP 0.8'W -7. # 1582 (9 STO �4J E%, F) FR& \` 0. '& BELLEVIEWIT E �3 QBS CABANA CLUB o 1590 Gulf Boulevard Clearwater, Florida 0 Q" SCHEMATIC DESIGN � ^�M1 JULY 14,2008 °_' ° / 2008 as N JCl 0 , �' /-'� -r HEISENBOTTLE A R C H I T E C T S 2199 PONCE DE LEON BLVD., SUITE 400 CORAL GABLES, FL 33134 TELEPHONE: 305/446-7799 FAX: 305/446 -9275 FLORIDA REGISTRATION NUMBER: AR 0010865 ®=7a& c2=7 rDA 0� �J 4 Qi ZFACE h^ CAP 0.8'W o N29'05'110(. �C�2) ECL BPB 3, PG 14 N89'04'07 "W(D3) SN &D / 120.SO'(03) FOUND BROKEN 102.80'(C) RIVET 0.34'S / BACK OF WALL SON POB(D5) 0.1'S OJ M 'V tiv � QO i h CONC UNDER S/W - t Mill { t• �'x 3 i� F �•f i �w.. f ,.. 1,.• +....�,t �.:.. i� Tree # Scientific Name Common Name DBH Height Spread Notes 2601 Sabal palmetto Sabal Palm 11" 20' 6 ' to remain 2602 Sabal palmetto Sabal Palm 12" 25' 7 to remain 2603 Sabal palmetto Sabal Palm 11" 25' 6 to remain 2604 Sabal palmetto Sabal Palm 12" 25' 6 to remain 2605 Sabal palmetto Sabal Palm 12" 25' 5' to remain 2606 Sabal palmetto Sabal Palm 12" 20' 5' to remain 2607 Sabal palmetto Sabal Palm 13" 25' 5' to remain 2608 Sabal palmetto Sabal Palm 11" 30' 5' to remain 2609 Sabal palmetto Sabal Palm 10" 30' 5' to remain 2610 Sabal palmetto Sabal Palm 12" 25' 7' to remain 2611 Saba/ palmetto Sabal Palm 17" 12' 7' to remain 2612 Sabal palmetto Sabal Palm 17" 12' 7' to remain 2613 Sabal palmetto Sabal Palm 11" 30' 7' to remain 2614 Sabal palmetto Sabal Palm 11" 30' 4' to remain 2615 Sabal palmetto Sabal Palm 11" 130. 5' to remain 2616 Sabal palmetto Sabal Palm 11" 25' 5' to remain 2617 Sabalpalmetto Sabal Palm 13" 30' 7' to remain 2618 Sabal palmetto Sabal Palm 10" 112" 30' 6' to remain 2619 Sabal palmetto Sabal Palm 12" 30' 6' to remain 2620 Sabal palmetto Sabal Palm 12" 35' 4' to remain 2621 Sabal palmetto Sabal Palm 11" 30' 5' to remain 2622 Sabal palmetto Sabal Palm 10" 25' 4' to remain 2623 Sabal palmetto Sabal Palm 12" 35' 6' to remain 2624 Sabal palmetto Sabal Palm 9" 20' 4' to remain 2625 Sabal palmetto Sabal Palm 10" 30' 5' to remain 2626 Sabal palmetto Sabal Palm 12" 30' 6' to remain 2627 Sabal palmetto Sabal Palm 13" 30' 6' to remain 2628 Sabal palmetto Sabal Palm 10" 15' 3' to remain 2629 Sabal palmetto Sabal Palm 1 9" 20' 5' to remain 2630 Sabal palmetto Sabal Palm 12" 25' 6' to remain 2631 Sabal palmetto Sabal Palm 11" 15' 2' to be removed 2632 Sabal palmetto Sabal Palm 11" 15' 2' to be removed 2633 ISabalpaknetto ISabal Palm 9" 15' 3' to be removed • ii � Iii♦ 1I DAN'S ISLAND ON SAND KEY A CONDOMINIUM 1600 GULF BOULEVARD, CPB 84, PG 94 2634 Sabal palmetto Sabal Palm 11" 15' 4' to be removed 2635 Sabal palmetto Sabal Palm 11" 20' 4' to be removed 2636 Washingtonia robusta Washington Palm 15" 20' 7' to be removed 2637 Washingtonia robusta Washington Palm 14" 20' 7' to be removed 2638 Washingtonia robusta Washington Palm 13" 45' 7' to be removed 2639 Washingtonia robusta Washington Palm 15" 15' 5' to be removed 2640 Washingtonia robusta Washington Palm 15" 45' 7' to be removed 2641 Washingtonia robusta Washington Palm 15" 20' 6' to be removed 2642 Washingtonia robusta Washington Palm 13" 45' 6' to be removed 2643 Sabal palmetto Sabal Palm 9" 30' 5' Ito be relocated 2644 Sabal palmetto Sabal Palm 7" 25' 6' Ito be relocated 2645 Sabal palmetto Sabal Palm 12" 30' 7' to be relocated 2646 Sabal palmetto Sabal Palm 11" 20' 7' to be relocated 2647 Sabal palmetto Sabal Palm 12" 25' 5' to be relocated 2648 Sabal palmetto Sabal Palm 13" 20' 8' to be relocated 2649 Sabal palmetto Sabal Palm 11" 15' 4' to be relocated 2650 Saba/ palmetto Sabal Palm 9" 20' 6' to be relocated 2651 Washingtonia robusta Washington Palm 13" 40' 6' to remain 2652 Syagrus mmanzofiana Queen Palm 10" 30' 7' to remain 2653 Washingtonia robusta Washington Palm 12" 50' 7' to remain 2654 Washingtonia robusta Washington Palm 12" 55' 7' to remain 2656 Strelitzia sp. White Bird of Paradise 6" x 5 25' 10' to remain 2657 Phoenix canariensis Canary Island Date Palm 22" 35' 12' to remain 2658 Washingtonia robusta Washington Palm 12" 45' 6' to remain 2659 Washingtonia robusta Washington Palm 13" 55' 6' to remain 2660 Washingtonia robusta Washington Palm 15" 35' 5' to remain 2661 Washingtonia robusta Washington Palm 23" at Grade Stump 0 to remain 2662 Sabal palmetto Sabal Palm 9" 20' 6' Ito remain 2663 Sabal palmetto Sabal Palm 13" 25' 7' to remain 2664 Sabal palmetto Sabal Palm 10" 25' 6' to remain 2665 Sabal palmetto Sabal Palm 13" 20' 6' to remain 2666 Sabal palmetto Sabal Palm 9" 30' 7' to remain 2667 1 Sabal palmetto Sabal Palm 12" 30' 6' to remain NOTE: SEE ARBORIST'S REPORT FOR COMPLETE INFORMATION ON TREES AND REASONS FOR RELOCATION OR REMOVAL. c J N CABANA CLUB CONDOMINIUMS CPB 77, PG 42 SN &D FD LB 6707, 1.00, WITNESS CORNER K / \S \Frog 0 c LEGEND OF SYMBOLS EXISTING TREE TO REMAIN EXISTING TREE TO BE REMOVED EXISTING TREE TO BE RELOCATED ODI EXISTING TREE NUMBER ! N —1 lb, lk L1'qq- /'C o�'e�FSS c� B S)8s Acc��`SS 0�4 J PLANTER (TYP) CONC PAVEMENT c9) 4 00 LINE TABLE LINE BEARING DISTANCE � ~!1 ��y U s L1 L,C S20'00'1 4"E 7.66' 2 N L2 (L,C) S65'00'14 "E- 16.00' L3 L,C S24-59-46 "W- _ 4.00' PAVEMENT /'C o�'e�FSS c� B S)8s Acc��`SS 0�4 J PLANTER (TYP) CONC PAVEMENT c9) 4 00 SCALE: 1 20'-011 L . ci i "� i•1 � ~!1 ��y U s SCALE: 1 20'-011 L . U'lun 1590 Gulf Boulevard Clearwater, Florida SCHEMATIC DESIGN JULY 14, 2008 H EISEN BOTTLE A R C H I T E C T S 2199 PONCE DE LEON BLVD.* SUITE 400 CORAL GABLES, FL 33134 TELEPHONE-, 305/446-7799 FAX: 305/446-9275 FLORIDA REGISTRATION NUMBER: AR 0010865 GZ:�V 0=0A gn�;jzu 1--s=mm DA C 44 0 Jv 44. t O Key Scientific Name Common Name Size Spacing Q!yLj" Trees GT Gleditsia tiacanthos var. inermis Thornless Honeylocust 45 Gal., 1 U-1 2" 2.5" Gal. Min. as indicated 4 MG Magnolia grandiflora 'Little Gem' Little Gem Magnolia 65 Gal., 10' -12', 2.5" cal. Min. as indicate-d" 4 QV Quercus vi . rgl . niana Live Oak 100 Gal., 10' -12' Ht, 2.5" cal. Min, as indicated 5 Palms SP Sabal palmetto Saba I Palm FG, 10'C.T. exceptwhere noted on plan, booted as indicated 51 4 PD_ Phoenix dactylifera 'Medjool' Medjool Date Palm FG, 14'-16'C.T., matched as indicated-' 9 1 I C N Cocosnucifem 'Ma p Maypan Coconut Palm FG 12' -14' C.T. F Shrubs AG Abelia x grandiflora Glossy Abelia 3 Gal., 18" Ht. Min. as indicated 17 GI � rys Cocoplum 3 Gal., 18" Ht. Min. Zo.c., square 779 ;4 I C-,j MC Myrica cerifera Wax Myrtle 3 Gal., 18" Ht. Min. as indicated 8 Groundcover HD Helianthus debilis Beach Sunflower 1 Gal. 18" triangular 60 TJ TI-achelospermumjasminoides Confederate Jasmine I Gal. 18" triangular 15431 rA. PV Paspalum vaginatum Seashore Paspalum *Contractor 7- in case of discrepancy, symbol count shall take precidence over tag quantity. All plants shall be Florida MAGNOLIA SABAL PALM WAX MYRTLE LEGEND OF SYMBOLS BEACH FRONT HOTEL ��0,,0 (EXISTING) 0 SABAL PALM COCOPLUM HEDGE (M) RECEPTOR SITE FOR RELOCATED TREE PLANTING PLAN + HONEYLOCUST (NEW) = DONOR TREE NUMBER <*PROPOSED TREE SYMBOL DATE PALM BEACH SUNFLOWER QV PROPOSED QUANTITY SCALE: 1" = 20'-011 (D 0 �OCONUT PALM EJASMINE LIVE OAK 0 GLOSSY ABELIA F-1 CORDGRASS 1590 Gulf Boulevard Clearwater, Florida SCHEMATIC DESIGN JULY 74, 2008 HEISENBO LE A R C H I T E C T S 2199 PONCE DE LEON BLVD.* SUITE 400 CORAL GABLES, FL 33134 TELEPHONE: 305/446-7799 FAX: 305/446-9275 FLORIDA REGISTRATION NUMBER: AR 0010865 l 02=7[U CSC#:1U t==M DA F O 44. C9 IV ILI Z� FACE OF SEA'&ALL CAP 0.6'W FASWalr U11F 0.08' NV OF CCCL VDIA. POT PLANT j PD 11 STORY MAS CONDO 213: , 3'T, E W/_)l '5110PY GAIRAG,1E c: # 1600 (TOTAL 12 STORY} Cj )undcover HD Helianthusdebilis Beach Sunflower 1 Gal. 18" 60 TJ -fiachelospernium I-asml . not des Confederate Jasmine 1 Gal. 1_8" triangular 11543 PV iq inatum Seashore Pas lum ....... ...... ...... -- - ------ - *Contractor to verify number of trees shown on plan; in case of discrepancy, symbol count shall take precidence over tag quantity. All plants shall be Florida #1 grade 0 MAGNOLIA 0 HONEYLOCUST 0 0 LIVE OAK SABAL PALM (EXISTING) SABAL PALM (NEW) <* DATE PALM *OCONUT PALM ED GLOSSY ABELIA 0 WAX MYRTLE LEGEND OF SYMBOLS [a COCOPLUM HEDGE REJASMINE F.] CORDGRASS (jD RECEPTOR SITE FOR RELOCATED TREE UMfl DONOR TREE NUMBER PROPOSED TREE SYMBOL NQV 2 PROPOSED QUANTITY Key Scientific Name d Common Size Spacing Qty. Trees GT Gleditsia t-iacanthos var. inermis Thornless Honeylocust 45 Gal., I U -12', 2.5" cal. Min, as indicated 4 MG Magnolia grandiflora 'Little Gem' Little Gem Magnolia 65 Gal., 10'-12', 2.5" cal, Min, — ----- 100 Gal., 10' -12' Ht, 2.5" cal. Min. as indicated as indicated 4 5 : . QV Quercus vi i i rg n ana Live Oak Palms SP Sabal palmetto Sabal Palm FG, 10' C.T. except where noted on plan, booted as indicated 51 PD Phoenix dactylifera 'Medjool' Medjool Date Palm FG, 14'-16'C.T., matched as indicated 9 ,-t� { CN - ----- Cocos nucitera 'Ma p n yR 0 conut Palm FG, 12' as indicated ---- --- =5 Shrubs AG Abelia x giandiflore Glossy Abelia 3 Gal., 18" Ht. Min. as indicated 17 Cl Chrysobalanus icaco Cocoplum --- --- ----- 3 Gal., 18" Ht. Min. Zo.c.,..�q �e 779 MC [Myrica cerifera Wax Myrtle 3 Gal., 18" Ht. Min. as indicated 8 )undcover HD Helianthusdebilis Beach Sunflower 1 Gal. 18" 60 TJ -fiachelospernium I-asml . not des Confederate Jasmine 1 Gal. 1_8" triangular 11543 PV iq inatum Seashore Pas lum ....... ...... ...... -- - ------ - *Contractor to verify number of trees shown on plan; in case of discrepancy, symbol count shall take precidence over tag quantity. All plants shall be Florida #1 grade 0 MAGNOLIA 0 HONEYLOCUST 0 0 LIVE OAK SABAL PALM (EXISTING) SABAL PALM (NEW) <* DATE PALM *OCONUT PALM ED GLOSSY ABELIA 0 WAX MYRTLE LEGEND OF SYMBOLS [a COCOPLUM HEDGE REJASMINE F.] CORDGRASS (jD RECEPTOR SITE FOR RELOCATED TREE UMfl DONOR TREE NUMBER PROPOSED TREE SYMBOL NQV 2 PROPOSED QUANTITY CABANA CLUB IRRIGATION MOTES 1 ALL LOCAL MUNICIPAL AND STATE LAWS, RULES AND REGULATIONS GOVERNING OR RELATING TO ANY PORTION OF THIS WORK ARE HEREBY INCORPORATED INTO AND MADE A PART OF THESE SPECIFICATIONS AND THEIR PROVISIONS SHALL BE CARRIED OUT BY THE CONTRACTOR. 2 THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY THE LOCATIONS OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES, STRUCTURES AND SERVICES BEFORE COMMENCING WORK. THE LOCATIONS OF UTILITIES, STRUCTURES AND SERVICES SHOWN IN THESE PLANS ARE APPROXIMATE ONLY. ANY DISCREPANCIES BETWEEN THESE PLANS AND ACTUAL FIELD CONDITIONS SHALL BE REPORTED TO THE OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE. 3 THE CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN THE PERTINENT ENGINEERING OR ARCHITECTURAL PLANS BEFORE BEGINNING WORK. 4 THE CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN ALL NECESSARY PERMITS REQUIRED TO PERFORM THE WORK INDICATED HEREIN BEFORE BEGINNING WORK. 5 THIS DESIGN IS DIAGRAMMATIC. ALL EQUIPMENT SHOWN IN PAVED AREAS IS FOR DESIGN CLARITY ONLY AND IS TO BE INSTALLED WITHIN PLANTING AREAS. 6 THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT WILLFULLY INSTALL ANY EQUIPMENT AS SHOWN ON THE PLANS WHEN IT IS OBVIOUS IN THE FIELD THAT UNKNOWN CONDITIONS EXIST THAT WERE NOT EVIDENT AT THE TIME THESE PLANS WERE PREPARED. ANY SUCH CONDITIONS SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE PRIOR TO ANY WORK OR THE IRRIGATION CONTRACTOR SHALL ASSUME ALL RESPONSIBILITY FOR ANY FIELD CHANGES DEEMED NECESSARY BY THE OWNER. 1590 Gulf Boulevard Clearwater Florida 7 INSTALL ALL EQUIPMENT AS SHOWN IN THE DETAILS AND SPECIFICATIONS. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE TO COMPLY WITH LOCAL CITY, COUNTY AND STATE i REQUIREMENTS FOR BOTH EQUIPMENT AND INSTALLATION. SCHEMATIC DESIGN JULY 14, 2008 HEISENBOTTLE 2199 PONCE DE LEON BLVD., SUITE 400 CORAL GABLES, FL 33134 TELEPHONE: 305/446 -7799 FAX: 305/446 -9275 FLORIDA REGISTRATION NUMBER: AR 0010865 lm; = 0 = na C ' I I ir 4==z Ems. 8 ACTUAL LOCATION FOR THE INSTALLATION OF THE BACKFLOW PREVENTER AND THE AUTOMATIC CONTROLLER IS TO BE DETERMINED IN THE FIELD BY THE OWNER'S AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE. 9 CONTRACTOR IS TO PROVIDE AN ADDITIONAL PILOT WIRE FROM CONTROLLER ALONG ENTIRETY OF MAIN LINE TO THE LAST RCV ON EACH AND EVERY LEG OF MAIN LINE. LABEL SPARE WIRES AT BOTH ENDS. 10 ALL PIPE UNDER PAVED AREAS TO BE INSTALLED IN SLEEVING TWICE THE DIAMETER OF THE PIPE CARRIED. SEE LEGEND FOR TYPE. ALL WIRE UNDER PAVED AREAS TO BE INSTALLED IN A SCH. 40 SLEEVE THE SIZE REQUIRED TO EASILY PULL WIRE THROUGH. ALL SLEEVES TO BE INSTALLED WITH A MINIMUM DEPTH AS SHOWN ON THE SLEEVING DETAILS. SLEEVES TO EXTEND AT LEAST 12" PAST THE EDGE OF THE PAVING. 11 ALL QUICK COUPLER AND REMOTE CONTROL VALVES TO BE INSTALLED IN SHRUB OR GROUND COVER AREAS WHERE POSSIBLE. ALL QUICK COUPLER AND REMOTE CONTROL VALVES TO BE INSTALLED AS SHOWN ON THE INSTALLATION DETAILS. INSTALL ALL QUICK COUPLER AND REMOTE CONTROL VALVES WITHIN 18" OF HARDSCAPE. 12 ALL HEADS ARE TO BE INSTALLED WITH THE NOZZLE, SCREEN AND ARCS SHOWN ON THE PLANS. ALL HEADS ARE TO BE ADJUSTED TO PREVENT OVERSPRAY ONTO BUILDINGS, WALLS, FENCES AND HARDSCAPE. THIS INCLUDES, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ADJUSTMENT OF DIFFUSER PIN OR ADJUSTMENT SCREW, REPLACEMENT OF PRESSURE COMPENSATING SCREENS, REPLACEMENT OF NOZZLES WITH MORE APPROPRIATE RADIUS UNITS AND THE REPLACEMENT OF NOZZLES WITH ADJUSTABLE ARC UNITS. 13 THE CONTRACTOR SHALL USE PROPER GROUNDING TECHNIQUES FOR GROUNDING THE CONTROLLER AND RELATED EQUIPMENT PER MANUFACTURERS SPECIFICATIONS. SWEENEY AND ASSOCIATES RECOMMENDS MEASURING FOR PROPER GROUND AT LEAST ONCE ANNUALLY, AND NECESSARY ADJUSTMENTS MADE TO COMPLY WITH MANUFACTURER SPECIFICATIONS. 14 THE IRRIGATION SYSTEM SHALL BE AUTOMATIC WITH A RAIN SENSOR/SHUTOFF DEVICE. THE AUTOMATIC SYSTEM SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. 15 THE IRRIGATION SYSTEM SHALL PROVIDE 100% COVERAGE OF ALL LANDSCAPE AREAS. 16 THE IRRIGATION SOURCE IS LOCATED IN THE LANDSCAPE BUFFER ADJACENT TO CR 183 AND IS CONNECTED TO A SEPARATE METER. THE IRRIGATION CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE TO VERIFYING THE EXACT LOCATION OF THE WATER SOURCE WITH THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR. f �a cm ti ^� ..f ;� 1 s °i f•� S.� e i mr• � N BEACH FRONT HOTEL IRRIGATION NOTES SCALE: 1" = 20' -0" H EISEN BO LE A R C H I T E C T S 2199 PONCE DE LEON BLVD., SUITE 400 CORAL GABLES, FL 33134 TELEPHONE: 305/446-7799 FAX: 305/446-9275 FLORIDA REGISTRATION NUMBER: AR 0010865 COPYRIGHT (0 2007 R.J. HEISENBOTTLE ARCHITECTS, P.A. A CABANA CLUB 1590 Gulf Boulevard Clearwater, Florida SCHEMATIC DESIGN JULY 14, 2008 1V;N4)1;[*1imAW 1=014111 L #WfF*)1j 7", • w: r�nv T• }, .i ; i- +:a•. ),.-i K'^L ', '�'^"'/�� r% , - ; > -. ;��' 5il r"�, R; .' ^ ",.',, ,i. . d 'tF' "�'=`, _ 01%M_ a 'ia TY k L,,, n �,: t: L: :{ F "\ r 1,r•:' _- l,'�,. ' ' .'tY /r V y ;` �'-' J )' W f ' F' / r� C Vi r �j''RI �.` , ,his f - M1(af, ntiryhM� , _ V% y ,F,,.�. ,l. ^.� y '125-1- , {.ice. 7`'• A l . � t '�� '; L F _ I'll ..w` R - err °�` `•.t.'• I. r: •FY � 4 u. id J. ....I,') :Y . rt. Jq" , •)Fu' 1 - 1'` - nT. i ,r - f 1 ti ., ,,y; Y i ! s �rf ``t'' +�'R� t y.•, t W i:l )- f s JJ 4 y � {:: fir 4a` ^�_ - ` k� , r< .- ' lY :L 4 k, r. ( -11 .s x t u,, �, 11 , , v re ,. - Y +'F I'll a: ;,,, i �Il r y,�q��'w� y R e u, , T' =' p {, q �` 4 : I. - - , tt 4 I _j <'•k. `, , +� �' :R "• ' -'tip, t „� ^' vt :: � ;:e r k E "i1'C. _ 1 •� j �L_. /trK - -11 9 a- f -rT ,y, ,,, s.lc„ A j •� iN y r ,l L V; ✓ Y C” ?.t °. > 1 c•:., '. v. :i. , -,', - - - f ,,fah avi',\ � , •iy tl qai _ a ::» " .'+r :' : °, ta_. „9• is t ?' rFt, u t u' i w ;::'' M' �. �`- :; .a. » .ly: .3. "' y _ � tiYi +' 'fY��. yA.L S tK, ig.+ P'N - - „ - N4, ,Lt: :v(Qk _ .! i '.# rS d) y d✓ to $ T7 ,a'• 1, :' S` :� (' ^�; tv '` :�µ r :[, •`q - 'y a7 '� . ,.}ri. - F ::ji. {'' f ;it fit' .) - - , ", 'y'. - - - - i' , ,¢5 - - _ 11 �.M `r 1', f�. i' i(; - 7' :! <,I'° i = w 1. : "` i 4; _ +J - - - _ tf ?•I , �;- •Y^ ;' - I - -s`.. - ' �.- i -, is ;' ,tr i - 1. - `r`., - - r:.i ` i' q:' ' h' s, f` z 't r, _ ::x' - - ,- • j' yy,G.��" :'.e. - - 'i , fir_ *;r - - Xr• ' 'it ' r �' ,\ A :( e � - a,l v. ti eS w +- it �r •;I•'�4' �.. `1i - 'i. 1' •ty 'i - 4 tr» it` fi: ;''' n ;j` !y<, hl ✓`i. 11 •'�;sn yr _ � r,L .5'"�.. Q. .(e, 1. - `� -' , u „., 1. h! u ti3' i A ^, ,r✓ ' j• /. Y " 'µ7•i , .lavr , „ `v - - - - - - _ '.�'' , - "{ np'' °t'` '''n �- ' t' "x. "' t µ��;.2;. _ .. :,1 t•` . T' 'S ''i-'. '.9i• f'' _ _•.k ''. 7' ?L'� i „i�' 7• t 1 �' ' iv' yl K '. f - .he`s,. i,ti,i4 11 J y.Nr• ; , r k +, ywsl: nA: � "., ' `min ^b he•, -1l :y- yf h' - `rF "La .l . sir r�l' .i^ "' > ,11 rn °r.t' b'- yi,,.,e J„1r � rf' 1 l •M, 4. a' ' ' "' w Y,. 'r �' 7 Pp: a r \�A. S' .\li " wy" vr, :�4,it)' •mil . I Y "fie. - .,, ,.,, ,. - .,.. _ ,, `b.;.'..,. ,.: <...r.•<.r -�. t, �rt`w.. s.. .. .. ..n. v'" ... ,_ ... r.w ��HEISENBOTfLE A R C H I T E C T 5 2199 PONCE DE LEON BLVD., SUITE 400 CORAL GABLES, FL 33134 TELEPHONE: 305/446 -7799 FAX: 305/446 -9275 FLORIDA REGISTRATION NUMBER: AR 0010865 COPYRIGHT Q 2007 R.J. HEISENBOTTLE ARCHITECTS, P.A. I.'•. `.., `r "^�i�w, 45:1:'°" -'}',� _ _ _ _ , %- N ", r 11 ~ h F Frf -S�' _ , t.) 'am k' ,.. =: }ih� rt •pis: ae, s - - „ „ f . , ._t , ... - - , a . 7 }F i•^ :nr J Yr s , (1.t - n' NJ: RM �R X- 4t r � . F qq M h•`:. t Mj+ 'Nt ,. 9X` N VAN R, �, b - ,t �I: a. y',.'. y -': Ah _ "5 ` 1 .'ti ,l,c :' , \ - - - - .`y - \+) ` _ ' h° i,4 ¢� . i s, ry FJrn.'1 r ,- \' I - - - \ , - - - - ", , , rr, - - 1 , . ,_ . . ' I_, " , ,L. .ra •�' „t,. ? {1. ,"'rt'°• '. -•t,F .,y �`,S - es4€y r ,"a'ti�j�„ ,tX,"r �F •'d ,f rt ;, h�Y�t.+b i.. 'rs,•Fi �;,� ta^ . :,rrf e M�s.r _ ,. »:_ y.a,. .4, �;� ;2.''�<r f �' 1'` •�e.e..^ 5.k'�r ��1,•'ir`w!,' ,rG: ?s3Hx +e c i:,...'ra� t a.. `Y{9�, ._ly.. ::1,. +a`v re a:. a �� ,k a tr,'F $i a : `. ;, 2�, i, �..,. ..s F:'; a a; 'S� `"wv;A, (`a;, rr.. t; s7* .1 �- ,FdbS , ^ m f 'B• '�?,; d'St'r �s,� 4 {§ }� {rCeE✓mai K'• en v.,'ss a „" •'`,4 t' " "^.4,� r '', 4 "+ t n #i tt ,>:;s 1(, 1C L F, %4 Y{na }p Kitt• " t •lr"L,i ,A7w ' s w + Ji ;:nn' w•t , , •r_ "'`»1's "s, •.t :. ' �'" : -,. k r.� , p d' `:IF: , F< 4, .tc, �"/. '�^', ( � ,Y ' ;1 d § x JG: %,. t 's'•: =:f - n/' Yt� t' +<� •ul' 3. .e 'Si+` f as x'sn h •C �, >4 ,?�j :1 s- a � Y r ,c �" •:!~, �•e - - , SAS+' e 7, =` 1 ,sµ �ntr. � r ) "t t 4 .f. � .• - - - Y� r`Y': a. r.•.:mir6 '..,.a,�,y�,•y, , wl?. [�.�•`..»}, . "".�..dlil J �Y' �•`" sai..: 1' os:: dbt,' 8- ai1N .,.e�.r•�:�aiw.`d."•`>�,.�." `�.g.'u �... -'.v.8i,«f.,_n..i. kro-,:..L� 4 -k�kt= - '•�u.. to !- I- ='` r I �rf ,' " l- ( ' i -A , I (!'y . WEST ELEVI-XII ®N RENDERING j *'-.I' .I- (_11 r_ 1 I'll '',','''',',,''''I � I i FI Z 'N M02 ; 'r y to �11� WA AE OM V 1590 Gulf Boulevard Clearwater, Florida SCHEMATIC DESIGN JULY 14, 2008 'Val Oi 1-We'to =111101 = f •` • 1; r „ -,, c. I" °,4' - - - i A 4 �.tr, n)Ltt`( trt". i *' , *, 1 Y ',�'E::,` - -✓. ,Y'..+. L M'7�. , L.' .1 �''4'•-` :['fit.. .�,' +n.J ±�W';ir'.�: i ° •>n - 'ik? • , .ra •�' „t,. ? {1. ,"'rt'°• '. -•t,F .,y �`,S - es4€y r ,"a'ti�j�„ ,tX,"r �F •'d ,f rt ;, h�Y�t.+b i.. 'rs,•Fi �;,� ta^ . :,rrf e M�s.r _ ,. »:_ y.a,. .4, �;� ;2.''�<r f �' 1'` •�e.e..^ 5.k'�r ��1,•'ir`w!,' ,rG: ?s3Hx +e c i:,...'ra� t a.. `Y{9�, ._ly.. ::1,. +a`v re a:. a �� ,k a tr,'F $i a : `. ;, 2�, i, �..,. ..s F:'; a a; 'S� `"wv;A, (`a;, rr.. t; s7* .1 �- ,FdbS , ^ m f 'B• '�?,; d'St'r �s,� 4 {§ }� {rCeE✓mai K'• en v.,'ss a „" •'`,4 t' " "^.4,� r '', 4 "+ t n #i tt ,>:;s 1(, 1C L F, %4 Y{na }p Kitt• " t •lr"L,i ,A7w ' s w + Ji ;:nn' w•t , , •r_ "'`»1's "s, •.t :. ' �'" : -,. k r.� , p d' `:IF: , F< 4, .tc, �"/. '�^', ( � ,Y ' ;1 d § x JG: %,. t 's'•: =:f - n/' Yt� t' +<� •ul' 3. .e 'Si+` f as x'sn h •C �, >4 ,?�j :1 s- a � Y r ,c �" •:!~, �•e - - , SAS+' e 7, =` 1 ,sµ �ntr. � r ) "t t 4 .f. � .• - - - Y� r`Y': a. r.•.:mir6 '..,.a,�,y�,•y, , wl?. [�.�•`..»}, . "".�..dlil J �Y' �•`" sai..: 1' os:: dbt,' 8- ai1N .,.e�.r•�:�aiw.`d."•`>�,.�." `�.g.'u �... -'.v.8i,«f.,_n..i. kro-,:..L� 4 -k�kt= - '•�u.. to !- I- ='` r I �rf ,' " l- ( ' i -A , I (!'y . WEST ELEVI-XII ®N RENDERING j *'-.I' .I- (_11 r_ 1 I'll '',','''',',,''''I � I i FI Z 'N M02 ; 'r y to �11� WA AE OM V 1590 Gulf Boulevard Clearwater, Florida SCHEMATIC DESIGN JULY 14, 2008 'Val Oi 1-We'to =111101 = f •` • 1; I i I mw VA, ,0 • • 1590 Gulf Boulevard Clearwater, Florida SCHEMATIC DESIGN JULY 14, 2008 � V <v !� ry o� a w V)� ' V � ry ECL BPB 3, PG 14 CONIC SEXWALL (2.0' WIVE) ---� / FACE OF rtv SEA WALL ^ / (( CAP 0.8'W N29'05'11'0.93'(C) 2) 49.63'(C, ECL) N89'04'07 °W(D3) FN &D FDC LB 6707 i FOUND BROKEN RIVET 0 34'S BACK OF WALL S/W 0.1'S 1.0'N 4� h 'Q' FA \ s68.ro C' FA ,368,101.1 03) C sE / S ��E F�c a5 -Inc \� s p ��kF/V� 38 S ti oJ� N �h O N Q �Qm 1 /,z 5' CONIC S/W HEISENBO LE A R C H I T E C T S 2199 PONCE DE LEON BLVD., SUITE 400 CORAL GABLES, FL 33134 TELEPHONE: 305/446 -7799 FAX: 305/446 -9275 FLORIDA REGISTRATION NUMBER: AR 0010865 COPYRIGHT © 2007 R.J. HEISENBOTTLE ARCHITECTS, P.A. S89'04' 07 "E D5) 5.63 W/ W / 1 STORY GARAGE RESTAURANT NET AREA = 4,981 S.F. TOTAL NUMBER OF GUEST ROOMS a 38 ROOMS (12 SUITES, 26 REGULAR) PARKING REQUIRED FOR HOTEL o 38 PARKING SPACES TOTAL PARKING PROVIDED INCLUDING 3 ACCESSIBLE SPACES = 56 SPACES 338.47'(D5) FN &D FDIC LB 6707, 1.00, WITNESS CORNER ,t \ NSa- ,8, sr°,. �� spy_ NO Q � , C,q //V, R�.�s q o s p c ?/i sNOc 2�9 W/ X —CUT n zn'c n m'\nl BEACH CLUB AREA CALCULATIONS HOTEL GROSS AREA = 3 9,9 31 S.F. RESTAURANT GROSS AREA = 5,862 S.F. TOTAL GROSS AREA = 4V93 S.F. POOL & DECK AREA = 51591 S.F. PLAi•!TER (TYP) /s �6 s N J c 01i) do �2 A G 28 PROPOSED e� i A C10 BEACH FRONT HOTEL , , s .., SCALE: 1/16" = T -OA = {� . T 1� MFk{I• I��` ., . , <, .. t °'t'1 -�t ,_� ,•` + -'•;'� L �•.� �� tbF,; , [31ELLEVIEW BILTMORE CABANA CLUB 1 r;Qn C1 Ilf Rnl upward C'IParwater. Florida m �p sss•o4'o7 °E D5) SCHEMATIC DESI JULY l4, 2008 ■ cj �v �V C) ^w� (CIV ryW 0)o, ov �J N QO N Q� C4 �U 421 V N ov • ECl_ BPB 3, / FACE OF SEA WALL t CAF 0 8'W N29.05'11 a (B 9 2) 1 49.63'(C, ECL) 99 5.63'(D54 V ^CID \ 4 :; � Q FACE OF \ S 104S„ O SEA WALL CAP 0.8'W EASEMENT UNE ,,TO FC 8S z 0.04' W OF CCCL ` FRS 21 � �� \ �S• 8 p•2� S ' TO CS�i0) • 3 Ri �.� FN \ CCU 1o' p vST S / oo• / r / B~ F� M RE U; ) Z 2� / -j 4j,) o� ,Z &j cv 0) j Mm /�� m 4 �� o Q• m / 1 / /C? CONC SE WALL (2 0' WI m o / N89'09'32' W EASEMENT UNE 0.08' W OF CCCL N89-04o/ W�uJ) FN &D ( ) -- 120.80' D3 FDC LB 6707 102.80'(C) POB(D3)-' FOUND BROKEN RIVET 0.34'S BACK 4 ' -9" OF WALL U 1'S I.O'N 5 CONC S/W HEISENBO L E A R C H I T E C T S 2199 PONCE DE LEON BLVD., SUITE 400 CORAL GABLES, FL 33134 TELEPHONE: 305/446 -7799 FAX: 305/446 -9275 FLORIDA REGISTRATION NUMBER: AR 0010865 COPYRIGHT © 2007 R.J. HEISENBOTTLE ARCHITECTS, P.A. Win■ BACK O WALL N89 °04'07' W(L,F) 06's 75' -6" SEAWALL UNDER S/W jjjp� 1111p ij� ii` L ING POOL 0 r� 8 STORY MAS CONDO FIR FDC W/ 1 STORY PARKING GARAGE LB 6707 4N1 # 1582 (9 STORY TOTAL) FIR 437 0. 6437 / s6S °0 ' C/C \ \, 0.35'S 0.11'w `''�' 4F(Or� C CONC� T STORY BLDG COR CONC WALL EIGH 0.2'E (0.65' WIDE) MAS BLDG (CONDOMINIUMS) NssoO j „ METAL DECK EXISTING ^�(0 CONDOMINIUM 00 0) / OFFICES (0 0. / y f S6S ° 0 ;sZ o' On, E (4) J1 111/111 Irfltllt /�/ \�� 111/Ilt IIIILIII � �/ '-� I �. •� 111 I ■�� IMltlrlt 'IM 1A CIIIII t ;�� \! rr I I`3� I ■�� O I ■�� [�I,111 LZy r� JAN. r. MEN'S swims I 74' -3" 11 STORY MAS CONDO W/ I STORY GARAGE # 1600 (TOTAL 12 STORY) 3 °9g(Or ?S, 3 N c° R ff MEN j OFFICE / FRO \OTON y HOTEL BELONT \� \ LOBBY \ 19 I EL. .0' / PORTE COCHERE \ BELOW \ a. r171 LOBBY ELEC. R11. Y dl)()M�PS 7 BOILER BOILER oa `� O FIRE PUMP HOUSE KEEPING LOWER 0 'I 297.21'(C) TO CCCL 400.09'(L) 345.86'(F) 338.47'(D5) FN &D FDC LB 6707, 1.00, WITNESS CORNE �, R s c S�$S��Ci� ° 7' ° c �r2 s A Fc co °F S� °� �S�• \ 7 R 9SS OOlt, / • 0 J� PLANTER (TYP) S �\ 4 ° A� 2 c /�,c�F "V-1 c o/ \ �A s` S J _6 46iq c 7� 9S �q °sF �2) >>' ass ) �664�• 01i) /3 o � ro ^(V oc� PD c `� G� \tiic�4� oti E /F O °e 0.7'SE z, Ar \ 16" 0.8'SE ry G 0 "OVA PARKING BELOW LAIN IDSCAPING 4.5' CONC S/W F/C 2."'N 0.6' bV 1 2'S POB(L) 1 z'E FIR FDC LB 6707 FCti1 6 "Y6„ W/ X -CUT 0.30'S, 0.07 "N �^ a 4b 4b 2' W/- D O / C1 ft 4"- QO �Q O Q J� `v Q� Z- AZ, J, Q O 1-1) z� Jv P / o INGF EAS ( -' z ° N89 °04- '07 "W(L) S BOUNDARY LINE 2351.90'(L,D1,D2,D5) (L,U1,D ?_,D B/C CONC VAI_ LT 264.9.19'(D3) 23.3 SE (FPC) N Z ON Welmmi;on ["ut mom ........ 4"- SCHEMATIC DESIGN JULY 14, 2008 R CD I d' I R N I _ 00 00 I i I 'LI R tC) HEISENBOTTLE A R C H I T E C T S 2199 PONCE DE LEON BLVD., SUITE 400 CORAL GABLES, FL 33134 TELEPHONE: 305/446 -7799 FAX: 305/446 -9275 FLORIDA REGISTRATION NUMBER: AR 0010865 COPYRIGHT ® 2007 R.J. HEISENBOTTLE ARCHITECTS, P.A. n I cy a p ROOM TYPES Fw L N N TYPE NET AREA to TOTAL N1 REGULAR ROOM = 413 S.F. + 78 S.F. = 491 �_.�.. 26 JUNIOR SUITE = 493 S.F. + R J R [D I CO N I _ 00 00 R I I R I Lo 74' -3" 5' -8" _ I CABANA CLUB - ROOM TYPES Fw Ct� TYPE NET AREA BALCONY TOTAL QUANTITY REGULAR ROOM = 413 S.F. + 78 S.F. = 491 S.F. 26 JUNIOR SUITE = 493 S.F. + 78 S.F. = 571 S.F. 4 DELUXE SUITE = 823 S.F. + 156 S.F. = 979 S.F. 2 DUPLEX SUITE A = 856 S.F. + 156 S.F. = 11012 S.F. 2 DUPLEX SUITE B = 870 S.F. + 78 S.F. = 948 S.F. 2 DUPLEX SUITE C = 977 S.F. + 78 S.F. = 11055 S.F. 2 R R (O I (L1 I N I _ co w R I I R I Lo �- i - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - I I I I I I Ir I I I I I I I I I I I I I L I I I I I I I I I I I i I I I- -------------------------------- - - - - -- 151-8" -j 74' -3" ll 040D N M= pMi�00 Fw Ct� M= pMi�00 BELLEV9EW BILTMORE CABANA CLUB 1590 Gulf Boulevard Clearwater, Florida SCHEMATIC DESIGN � � ` ,�% ,, -\ JULY 14, 2008 r6a H EISEN BO LE A R C H I T E C T S 2199 PONCE DE LEON BLVD., SUITE 400 CORAL GABLES, FL 33134 TELEPHONE: 305/446-7799 FAX: 305/446-9275 FLORIDA REGISTRATION NUMBER: AR 0010865 COPYRIGHT (0) 2007 R.J. HEISENBOTTLE ARCHITECTS, P.A. PARKING BELOW NNI N1.1 N 0 W Q' 011V 0• cf) BELLEVIEW BILTMODNE CABANA CLUB 1590 Gulf Boulevard Clearwater, Florida SCHEMATIC DESIGN JULY 14, 2008 EXISTING T"I HEISENBO LE A R C H I T E C T S 2199 PONCE DE LEON BLVD., SUITE 400 CORAL GABLES, FL 33134 TELEPHONE: 305/446 -7799 FAX: 305/446 -9275 FLORIDA REGISTRATION NUMBER: AR 0010865 COPYRIGHT Q 2007 R.J. HEISENBOTTLE ARCHITECTS, P.A. N.G.V.D. EL. 0' -0" EAST ELEVATION PAINT /COLOR LEGEND SYMBOL_ 1O SHERWIN WILLIAMS PAINT - SW1900 LUMINOUS WHITE O2 SHERWIN WILLIAMS PAINT - SW6468 HUNT CLUB O OWENS CORNING ASPHALT SHINGLE - CHATEAU GREEN O TERRACOTTA BRICK - NATURAL COLOR EXISTING CONDOMINIUM lVimimo ';L*Iim -mI ' I Own ,W]WIT I - illm,24MM00i'm SCALE: 3/32" T-011 !:' c f 6.:.n CABANA CLUB 1590 Gulf Boulevard Clearwater, Florida SCHEMATIC DESIGN JULY 74, 2008 EXISTING CONDOMINIUM WEST ELEVATION! H EISEN BO LE A R C H I T E C T S 2199 PONCE DE LEON BLVD., SUITE 400 CORAL GABLES, FL 33134 TELEPHONE: 305/446 -7799 FAX: 305/446 -9275 FLORIDA REGISTRATION NUMBER: AR 0010865 COPYRIGHT Q 2007 R.J. HEISENBOTTLE ARCHITECTS, P.A. N.G.V.D. EL. 0' -0'-' PAINT /COLOR LEGEND SYMBOL_ 1� SHERWIN WILLIAMS PAINT - SW1900 LUMINOUS WHITE O SHERWIN WILLIAMS PAINT - SW6468 HUNT CLUB 3O OWENS CORNING ASPHALT SHINGLE - CHATEAU GREEN 4O TERRACOTTA BRICK - NATURAL COLOR EXISTING CONDOMINIUM �:Z�71i�9��7 liz-1 ,k ELEVATIONS . ._ SCALE: 3/32" =1' -017 A-6007 t s B""ELLEVIEW BILTMO' ' i A A. • Ik AM .. 1590 Gulf Boulevard Clearwater, Floric SCHEMATIC DESIGN JULY 14, 2008 r R j HEISENBOTTLE A R C H I T E C T S 2199 PONCE DE LEON BLVD., SUITE 400 CORAL GABLES, FL 33134 TELEPHONE: 305/446 -7799 FAX: 305/446 -9275 FLORIDA REGISTRATION NUMBER: AR 0010865 COPYRIGHT Q 2007 R.J. HEISENBOTTLE ARCHITECTS, P.A. SOUTH ELEVATION! • y v U 1 E M 0 0 N rri a In I 3 a r OryoJ o�Q0 (( S89'5 83 (05)05) v V� \ QOa \seyO.4 3 V FACE OF 1 SEA WALL jJ NEST PROPERTY LINE SQS7o�(c, �(D �ZecAP D.e'w/ EASEMENT LINE r �\ as METAL STAIRS 86 2/S 3eRp4'° '- TQ as. cccC � o o3eS MET 3 f SO yC)l/ 8 I < S 2.00' / o 8 STORY MAS CONDO FIR 5/8" FDC R O° W/ 1 STORY PARKING GARAGE LB 6707 wryr ;� > # 1582 (9 STORY TOTAL) FIR 5/8- ti LB 6437 0.35'S Sssb C/C / 0.11'W /�)• Olq+ / F(O / ,t, CONC CONC WALL BLDG COR h J x(0.65' WIDE) 0.2 E AL DECK .30 E'BLDG BELOW AIL +�`�� / C��, 1 NORTH SIDE a, 4-b �C, °O=I N R i N / / WITNESS 76•x\ , COMMON WALL � A \ 1 � \ ^�' i SOS / \ \ bp• , Cj 2 STORY MAS BLDG W/ VINYL SIDING �� •e Q ECL BPB 3, PG 14 <c ;�./ \ W/ 1 STORY PARKING GARAGE # 1590 / BLDG COR Jv 1\z. / N fr \ (TOTAL 3 STORY) NOTE: IMPROVEMENTS 0.2'S, 3.5-E IN THE GARAGE AREA SUCH AS BUT NOT LIMITED TO COLUMNS, ELEVATOR , CONC FLOOR, BLDG COR STORAGE AREAS, PUMPS ETC. WERE NOT MAPPED. 0.2 S, ' 0.4E o ^rye I n "CABANA CLUB BAR & GRILL" METAL STAIRS (TYP) ti OJ `� /�� ROOF OVERHANG (TYP) A A, o s. tea' V4, /oh O ;`� ( ELEVATED CONC DECK /4 =Q. SAND may+ Qey� ��/ Cj CONC STEPS (TYP) J" J =�4 W dy0 wpb F ^'1i �-h CONC ? x'00- �� ^'/ (0 0)l CCCL OP 2 A; u 2 Z POOL L'1°�0'S10I,1 C (,. 'N I IF`,0 LINE/ / �h � �p CONC r, �°" ° 1 _ �0 Q "7 F t:iA i" I i I All -I, LIY I- ` CONC SEAWALL 4+ (2.0' WIDE) (SEE DETAIL 2) FACE OF �� O N89V9'32 "W EASEMENT LINE SEA WALL 5.63 0.08' W OF CCCL Al CAP 0.8•W o JACUZZI N29'05'11 "E(BP -2) CONC TIE BACK WALL 0.93'�C) ��`� (1.7' WIDE) / O� v // WOOD 49.6S(C, ECL) F '� fS/W I 1 4, N CONC DEC �O 1*1 0 OS p3 z 3 a CONC O GRATE INLET S�9eYo /I COR s J� J C/C (DECORATIVE) I- PLANTER U z 0 U LU A , , t. 4 N /•A AAIA !,I I IE3 !. n!' !\Nl\, /IN11111IL` v/"� nlvn vL.V vvlvVVIV111vlVlvl.: !, a a!, A f) SN &D FDC I LB 6707, 1.00, i O= ^ry WITNESS CORNER ¢ . cglc CONC PAVEMENT �F(O /J cli,Pe fto °FF�Fc °R °Re S��FtiT 6, FSS 8bifo GRATE INLET F(D ?� Ise PLANTER (TYP) COLUMN (TYP) O,, RF tiq 40• (WOOD) ` 8S 'Occ'QF s�ey 9 (20 sFMF CONC PAVEMENT 'V 3.5' CONC S/W ® ® PLANTER CONC WALL' (0.7' WIDE), PROPERTY AREA= 59,956 SQ FT OR (o ti �, _�, 1.376 AC, MORE OR LESS (6II 0) A C) A T /11_ TIC r x/11 I-rU A -s A /%r) f n I MR vI II IL_ JVVII I `t /`t.V� PLANTER la c G� e CONC PAVEMENT (PARKING) CONC PAVEMENT Off\ o ?\"V off' • coNc 8 Blpsk �'P,r SIGN ory AD j 2' W/F CONC PAVEMENT i CONC PAVEMENT (PARKING) \7V V 1_RI VIVII_1 V 1 L_V I c�_l�L_ (PARKING) le W R/W LINE GULF BLVD(L) �o (BEARING BASIS) FLOOD ZONE LINE SEE LIMITATIONS 13 AND 14 0.5' CONC CURB (TYP) �O.O'N -O = 0 1.4!N N89V4'07 "W(D3) _ LANDSCAPING SN &D 120.80'(03) _ - ' SAN 297.21 FOUND BROKEN 102.800'/'(C) P08(D3) ►n,� 0.2•S (C TO CCCL RIVET 0.34'S BACK i BACK N89 "07%J(L,F) 4.5' CONC S/W OF WALL 1 O N POB(D5) 5' CONC S/W ,/ OFOW6ALL 400.09�(L,Ci) 0.1's CONC / 11 STORY MAS CONDO 345.86'(F) UNDER S/W W/ 1 STORY GARAGE 338.47'(D5) # 1600 (TOTAL 12 STORY) MAAIIC- IC- ALI11 rNAI CAklIn I ,-n Lj IIf v I- LJ'11VV VIV vf11VV 1 \L.1 A !%l1K111l1f IlAll1 1 ►/ 4 r% /�I 11 F- I'1 vVIVVVIVIIIVIVIVI 1 �VV \7VL.1 ^I''�ill 11 MIA 11 /�,�^ R A a!% u..A {./ \J V L_L_ V In Lj v I G� v `t, I \7 v t Em °ri3 t:.:7 C'3 an V79 t-1 :.:'3 M C.3 E_:Y ru1'3 CZ3 V72 M-7 •.'.`_9 E „3 E73 E':7 rm C.".,I r^..:7 mm rm f7"1 L"'7 r7m C^_3 r--'A f=1 C°3 rM 9--1 =3 M M EM t'-"2 U72 E".._7 E."'.9 C9 G`." M ETA C'u9 4`I-2 E'M2 m E73 1--1 r7l C",',7 r---3 mn Em Gam] G°.7 r" €':7 L "'3 C..:_7 C':10 E-;:3 C.:3 M3 C.7 17"3 r"I r_"'n r';..3 1= 1272 C::°9 F;.7 r7l ,T--7 -'7 C"_9 Im rM C;3 r",A C'.;J G';:A rM r-z P_'3 rml r-o EASEMENT DETAIL 1- = 20' v D� 0 ty� v N89'04'07 "W((D6) QO OJ 1667.86'((06) �_ 7 Q i-i'iL i'ir�R8 \0R, n vV14UVIViilvilJIVi 6' WA r;�` -u �!� t= INGRESS /EGRESS POOL PUMP .., L� ..., , \7 56 EASEMENT (D4) ON C/S 02 POOL FILTER •4 -G r J ON C/S ry� RIGHTS TO SUBMERGED LANDS I \ \ S ON S, Cp CONC SEAWALLO ry� ORB 4804, PG 1491 (D6) •� O`O V N !e Q' p EASEMENT HC yam' LINE S (1.4• WIDE) CONC WALL 00 0 01 _ (SEE DETAIL 1) (0.3; HIGH)X \ / ) / FACE 2 h S89V4'07"E(D4) 2.0 HIGH F C S31.58'20 "W(D4 ry "3 �. '4 ^� / 234.69'(04) 1.2'S 8.17'(D4) CAP 0.3'SE POB(D6) / N89'04'24- W((D6) 3.5' CONC S/W g o 789.26'((D6) :- 4.0' CONC S/W POB (D4) S LINE OF SEC 19- 29S- 15E(D4) FIR 5/8" 2y N89'"07 -W(D4) 234.69'(04) S89 V4'07- E((D6) 1212.41'((06) / N/C V° WOOD DOCK N69V407 D4 2000.39'(D4) o I FACE OF SE CORNER OF ILI h' I SEA WALL c/s C/s FACE OF I 19- 29 -15E D4,D6 CAP 0.3'S 0.9.5 SEA WALL ( ) 1.0'5 CAP 0.5'S I00 BOAT SUPS THIS AREA (TYP) 0 j I � I r I I WATER CLEARWATER HARBOR P1 eM E:-3 ea r.:,3 c-:3 arr3 r =3 C3 C°I r,.a r>331 r:3 1._.3 E::2 r rem az� ='Z r1A r°3 eA M12 C:.13 E`2 q 2 r. -1 E73 r:3 -13 r-1:2 r1:3 am r--3 mm r:°.3 r.1m Ou = Elm r= rm r"i r;13 --13 rl_u rm um n= Cm c:-3 r_a rim =3 r:^3 a c:A r= r-..,e V, -1 c-1 =3 ea Ez r°,3 sr-3 C-71 r--1 t.'] !73 CZA eo z r_ :l E-:1 Z.m r"i " r1m r.°-a VZ2 C-"j 0:3 A/0� q 4 / F/ 4° C !�] 22'N cif Q- 0.6' W / Q�4, s/w POB(L) 1A 1.2'E FIR 5/8" �\ B/C FDC LB 6707 23.3'SE FCM 6 "X6" :P D W/ X -CUT V° 0.30'5, 0.07'W p h• m 0 �O Section 19, Township 29 South, Range 15 East, City of Clearwater, County of Pinellas, State of Florida 04 01 2, A c 289 73 So 00- O° h %UL1 0� o � ry O /P IQ 0.7'SE Q� �C 08SE 4L If 4e °py J� C'] q �/v / 116.82'(C_F) ` N89'04'07 'W(C,F) N89'04'07 "W(L,C) 2351.9O'(L, D 1, D 2, D5) CONC VAULT 2649.19'(D3) (POWER) LINE TABLE DETAIL 2 LINE BEARING DISTANCE L1 L,C S20'0014 E 7.66' L2 L,C S65'0014 E 16.00' L3 (LC) 524'59 46 W 4.00' CONC PAVEMENT Off\ o ?\"V off' • coNc 8 Blpsk �'P,r SIGN ory AD j 2' W/F CONC PAVEMENT i CONC PAVEMENT (PARKING) \7V V 1_RI VIVII_1 V 1 L_V I c�_l�L_ (PARKING) le W R/W LINE GULF BLVD(L) �o (BEARING BASIS) FLOOD ZONE LINE SEE LIMITATIONS 13 AND 14 0.5' CONC CURB (TYP) �O.O'N -O = 0 1.4!N N89V4'07 "W(D3) _ LANDSCAPING SN &D 120.80'(03) _ - ' SAN 297.21 FOUND BROKEN 102.800'/'(C) P08(D3) ►n,� 0.2•S (C TO CCCL RIVET 0.34'S BACK i BACK N89 "07%J(L,F) 4.5' CONC S/W OF WALL 1 O N POB(D5) 5' CONC S/W ,/ OFOW6ALL 400.09�(L,Ci) 0.1's CONC / 11 STORY MAS CONDO 345.86'(F) UNDER S/W W/ 1 STORY GARAGE 338.47'(D5) # 1600 (TOTAL 12 STORY) MAAIIC- IC- ALI11 rNAI CAklIn I ,-n Lj IIf v I- LJ'11VV VIV vf11VV 1 \L.1 A !%l1K111l1f IlAll1 1 ►/ 4 r% /�I 11 F- I'1 vVIVVVIVIIIVIVIVI 1 �VV \7VL.1 ^I''�ill 11 MIA 11 /�,�^ R A a!% u..A {./ \J V L_L_ V In Lj v I G� v `t, I \7 v t Em °ri3 t:.:7 C'3 an V79 t-1 :.:'3 M C.3 E_:Y ru1'3 CZ3 V72 M-7 •.'.`_9 E „3 E73 E':7 rm C.".,I r^..:7 mm rm f7"1 L"'7 r7m C^_3 r--'A f=1 C°3 rM 9--1 =3 M M EM t'-"2 U72 E".._7 E."'.9 C9 G`." M ETA C'u9 4`I-2 E'M2 m E73 1--1 r7l C",',7 r---3 mn Em Gam] G°.7 r" €':7 L "'3 C..:_7 C':10 E-;:3 C.:3 M3 C.7 17"3 r"I r_"'n r';..3 1= 1272 C::°9 F;.7 r7l ,T--7 -'7 C"_9 Im rM C;3 r",A C'.;J G';:A rM r-z P_'3 rml r-o EASEMENT DETAIL 1- = 20' v D� 0 ty� v N89'04'07 "W((D6) QO OJ 1667.86'((06) �_ 7 Q i-i'iL i'ir�R8 \0R, n vV14UVIViilvilJIVi 6' WA r;�` -u �!� t= INGRESS /EGRESS POOL PUMP .., L� ..., , \7 56 EASEMENT (D4) ON C/S 02 POOL FILTER •4 -G r J ON C/S ry� RIGHTS TO SUBMERGED LANDS I \ \ S ON S, Cp CONC SEAWALLO ry� ORB 4804, PG 1491 (D6) •� O`O V N !e Q' p EASEMENT HC yam' LINE S (1.4• WIDE) CONC WALL 00 0 01 _ (SEE DETAIL 1) (0.3; HIGH)X \ / ) / FACE 2 h S89V4'07"E(D4) 2.0 HIGH F C S31.58'20 "W(D4 ry "3 �. '4 ^� / 234.69'(04) 1.2'S 8.17'(D4) CAP 0.3'SE POB(D6) / N89'04'24- W((D6) 3.5' CONC S/W g o 789.26'((D6) :- 4.0' CONC S/W POB (D4) S LINE OF SEC 19- 29S- 15E(D4) FIR 5/8" 2y N89'"07 -W(D4) 234.69'(04) S89 V4'07- E((D6) 1212.41'((06) / N/C V° WOOD DOCK N69V407 D4 2000.39'(D4) o I FACE OF SE CORNER OF ILI h' I SEA WALL c/s C/s FACE OF I 19- 29 -15E D4,D6 CAP 0.3'S 0.9.5 SEA WALL ( ) 1.0'5 CAP 0.5'S I00 BOAT SUPS THIS AREA (TYP) 0 j I � I r I I WATER CLEARWATER HARBOR P1 eM E:-3 ea r.:,3 c-:3 arr3 r =3 C3 C°I r,.a r>331 r:3 1._.3 E::2 r rem az� ='Z r1A r°3 eA M12 C:.13 E`2 q 2 r. -1 E73 r:3 -13 r-1:2 r1:3 am r--3 mm r:°.3 r.1m Ou = Elm r= rm r"i r;13 --13 rl_u rm um n= Cm c:-3 r_a rim =3 r:^3 a c:A r= r-..,e V, -1 c-1 =3 ea Ez r°,3 sr-3 C-71 r--1 t.'] !73 CZA eo z r_ :l E-:1 Z.m r"i " r1m r.°-a VZ2 C-"j 0:3 A/0� q 4 / F/ 4° C !�] 22'N cif Q- 0.6' W / Q�4, s/w POB(L) 1A 1.2'E FIR 5/8" �\ B/C FDC LB 6707 23.3'SE FCM 6 "X6" :P D W/ X -CUT V° 0.30'5, 0.07'W p h• m 0 �O Section 19, Township 29 South, Range 15 East, City of Clearwater, County of Pinellas, State of Florida 04 01 2, A c 289 73 So 00- O° h %UL1 0� o � ry O /P IQ 0.7'SE Q� �C 08SE 4L If 4e °py J� C'] q �/v / 116.82'(C_F) ` N89'04'07 'W(C,F) N89'04'07 "W(L,C) 2351.9O'(L, D 1, D 2, D5) CONC VAULT 2649.19'(D3) (POWER) ¢ r- 13maCM mmm"- r:nr. r73 r--,3 r-13 VIM DETAIL 2 Q DETAIL 1 NOT TO SCALE NOT TO SCALE i� 2.0' U I� 0 COR €� z I� a 0.5' a '°Ll (0.65' N o try 7 � ¢ r- 13maCM mmm"- r:nr. am e m V -3 M_2En c= DETAIL 2 NOT TO SCALE NOT TO SCALE i� 2.0' U J 3 � o.s W COR €� z �g U '°Ll c 3 E 9 c^f .E-M C / oe 0 10 20 40 SEE EASEMENT DETAIL BELOW "^'l7 C^.7 r'"A S E'.". fh"°,: n= E:A C1� rm =1 C'.� E G':9 M3 L°3 =11 773 &_L7 F, °o INGRESS /EGRESS I� / ° EASEMENT 04) I� S LINE OF SEC 19- 29S -15E (L,D1,D2,D3,D4,D5) POC (L) POC (D1,D2,D3,D4,D5,D6) SE COR OF FlR 518' N/C SEC 19- 29 -15E (L) N/F -FALLS IN CI EARWATER HARBOR �;sge�c2e E°s € M3E`4m=&M =ar r°Ie rnr-3rmmesmmr3 rum ,mommaEM m"Irn U17 wam ml mm rm am e m V -3 M_2En c= BLDG DETAIL NOT TO SCALE SIR 2.00' WITNESS CORNER COR Q G Q e2. BON ry S? o CONC WALL (0.65' WIDE) 7 � 08' 3' O n Ld � A13 :. 0'• Ii rmm- -3rnmE^2s^3»rir m:i ram rmcmm1- iEmv-ms---jrmc-- 3E-.aEmr.m =1 DESIGNED THE SIGNATURE OF THE QUALITY PREPARED FOR: SHEET DESCRIPTION: JOB NO. CONTROL OFFICER IN THIS SPACE j(n JE�:/°�� (j��, jJ��ln� (j/" /� 1 I INDICATES THAT ALL REQUIRED FLORIDA ®L1Srti/IG V `�/O SUL TA � TS. VC. DRAWN PERMITS HAVE BEEN OBTAINED fItl ®V9 �N AND THAT CONSTRUCTION IS CHECKED AUTHORIZED TO COMMENCE. ENGINEERS, ENVIRONMENTALISTS, SURVEYORS s PLANNERS CABANA CLUB BOUNDARY EXHIBIT F.B. 8 PG. SHT 3030 Starkey Blvd, New Port Richey FL 34655 PARCEL VI Tel: (727) 849 -7588 - Fax: (727) 648 -3648 O.C. DATE, I E.B. NO. -T421 N0. DATE REVISIONS APD OF BY d 0 m f!1 E L 0 a C a� 3 0 t 3 v a3 U 0 L Cx L 0 v a� rn v 0 C v 0 CL 0 U C 0 U v c O W rn s= v 0 U C vi C v 7 C O C.) C .N O 0 •v O U- CD O O N L CL O U X u QZ,,Yl ~ :,�\ i 9 } �xt � F £ { F ¢ x mot; � jb � { {i. tu:!,?s••.,ar Ui {4 Florida Desim Consuftants. Inc. ....,.:.::41, F