The URL can be used to link to this page

FLD2012-03008; 443 EAST SHORE DR; COURTYARD BY MARRIOTT� 443 EAST SHORE DR Date Received: 3/5/2012 9:06:16 AM Courtyard by Marriott ZONING DISTRICT: Tourist LAND USE: Resort Facilities High (30 du/acre) ATLAS PAGE: 267A PLANNER OF RECORD: PLANNER: Matthew Jackson, Planner II � CDB Meeting Date: Case Number: Agenda Item: Owner/ Applicant: Representative: Address: June 19, 2012 FLD2012-03008 D. 1. (Related to E. 2.) Louis Developments LLC Renee Ruggiero, Seniar Pro�ect Planner, Northside En in� eerin� 443 East Shore Drive (includin� 460, 462, 463 and 465 East Shore Drive) CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT GENERAL INFORMATION: REQUEST: Flexible Development approval to permit 1) a 134-unit Overnight Accommodation use (through an increase of the permitted density by the allocation of 71 overnight accommodation units from the Hotel Density Reserve created pursuant to Beach by Design) and 6,500 square feet of restaurant use in the Tourist (T) District with a lot area of 43,415 square feet (0.99 acres), a lot width of 315 feet along East Shore Drive and 137.72 feet along Papaya Street, a front (west along East Shore Drive) setback of zero feet (to building), a front (south along Papaya Street) setback of 21.1 feet (to building) and three feet to wood patio, a side (north) setback of 19 feet (to building), a side (east) setback of 11.4 feet (to building), a building height of 85.5 feet (to midpoint of pitched roo� and 193 parking spaces and 2) an off-street parking lot in the T District with a lot area of 11,514 square feet (0.26 acres), lot widths of 100.4 feet along East Shore Drive and Poinsettia Street, a front (east along East Shore Drive) setback of 8.4 feet (to pavement), a front (west along Poinsettia Street) setback of five feet (to pavement), a side (north) setback of five feet (to pavement), a side (south) setback of five feet (to pavement) and 24 parking spaces and a two year development order as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Community Development Code Section 2-803.C. ZONING DISTRICT: Tourist (T) FUTURE LAND USE PLAN CATEGORY: Resort Facilities High (RFH) BEACH BY DESIGN CHARACTER DISTRICT: PROPERTY USE: Marina District Current: Vacant overnight accommodations. (42 units) Proposed: 134 Overnight Accommodation units, Restaurant of 6,500 square feet of floor area and 201 parking with a 0.11 Floor Area Ratio at a height of 85.5 feet (to midpoint of pitched roo�. Community Development Board — June 19, 2012 FLD2012-03008 — Page 1 of 10 EXISTING SURROUNDING ZONING AND USES: North: Tourist (T) District Overnight Accommodations South: Tourist (T) District Overnight Accommodations East: Tourist (T) District Overnight Accommodations West: Open SpacelRecreation (OS/R) District Intracoastal Waterway ANALYSIS: Site Location and Existing Conditions: The 1.26-acre subject property is located at the northeast corner of East Shore Drive and Papaya Street which is within the "Marina" District of Beach by Design. The majority of the site is currently vacant with the remainder of the area developed with three single-story buildings containing 42 overnight accommodation units. Development Proposal: The proposal is to redevelop the site with a 134-unit mid-priced hotel including a 6,500 square foot restaurant. The building will be seven stories with the parking on the first three levels and includes a boardwalk along the intracoastal with a minimum width of 15 feet. The proposal includes a tropical modern architecture, which is appropriate for this waterfront property and complements the tropical vernacular envisioned in Beach by Design. The building mass consists of a three-story base, two towers at the north and south sides of the building and a main tower in the middle of the building. The ground floor building design at the entrance to the development on East Shore Drive is opened up to the greatest extent possible in order to create a prominent entrance and space that is inviting to the public. Two water features flank the pedestrian entrance, a structural glass awning extends over the pedestrian entry and the building wall on the north half of the facade has been pulled back to allow for space to provide amenities such as public art or pedestrian seating. Smaller scale decorative louvered sunshades, aluminum railings, coral stone elements and standing seam metal roof elements are also included. The site is designed with three driveways on East Shore Drive (two for the hotel and one for the accessory parking lot). For the hotel, the southern driveway will be entrance only and the northern driveway exit only. The building is designed with the passenger drop-off and main pedestrian entrance on the ground level. This lowest level provides elevator and stair building access areas, a restaurant facing the intracoastal, boardwalk, trash staging area and nine parking spaces. Levels two and three axe parking areas and each contains 84 parking spaces of which four are handicapped on each level. Level four is the main lobby level and includes the check-in area, hotel units, hotel administrative office, exercise room, laundry area, bar, cafe dining, media area, storage area, vending machines and pool area including cabanas. Levels five through seven consists of 36 hotel units on each floor. The materials and color of the building will support the tropical modern architecture and its natural surroundings. The base of the building will be painted beige accented with coral stone architectural details. The remainder of the building will be painted tan also with sandstone architectural details. The roof will be standing seam metal light green in color. The window mullions, railings and pool trellis will be white. Community Development Board — June 19, 2012 FLD2012-03008 — Page 2 of 10 A 50-slip dock previously approved under FLD2009-02009 is also to be constructed. Of the total number of slips, 32 will be available to the public with the remaining 18 slips dedicated to the hotel. The 32 public slips (marina) require a total of 16 off-street parking spaces. The applicant is requesting a two-year development order which staff has historically supported in conjunction with projects of similar scope. Community Development Code (CDC) Section 4- 407 specifies that an application for a building permit must be submitted within one year of the date the CDB approves the project, unless otherwise specified under this approval. Also on this Community Development Board (CDB) agenda is a companion Development Agreement (DVA2012-03001) that must be approved by City Council, which provides for general and specific parameters of the project and other design considerations. The development proposal's compliance with the various development standards of the (CDC) is discussed below. Floor Area Ratio (FAR� Pursuant to the Countywide Plan Rules and CDC Section 2-801.1, the m�imum FAR for properties with a future land use plan designation of Resort Facilities High is 1.0. The proposal is for a total of 6,500 square feet of floor area (accessory restaurant) at a FAR of 0.1 l, which is consistent with the Code provisions. Impervious Surface Ratio (ISR� Pursuant to the Countywide Plan Rules and CDC Section 2- 801.1, the maximum allowable ISR is 0.95. The proposed ISR is 0.84, which is consistent with the Code provisions. Minimum Lot Area and Width: Pursuant to CDC Table 2-803, there is no minimum lot area or width requirement for Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Projects. The subject property has a lot area of 54,929 square feet. The lot width of the hotel portion of the subject property along East Shore Drive is 315 feet and 130.84 feet along Papaya Street. The lot widths of the parcel containing the off-street parking lot along East Shore Drive and Poinsettia Street are 100.4 feet. Minimum Setbacks: Pursuant to CDC Table 2-803, there are no minimum setback requirements for Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Projects. The development proposal (hotel portion) includes a front (west along East Shore Drive) setback of zero feet (to building), front (south along Papaya Street) setbacks of 21.1 feet (to building) and three feet (to wood patio), a side (north) setback of 19 feet (to building) and a side (east) setback of 11.4 feet (to building). The off-street parking lot has a front (east along East Shore Drive) setback of 8.4 feet, a front (west along Poinsettia Street) setback of five, a side (north) setback of five feet and a side (south) setback of five feet. Maximum Building Height: Pursuant to CDC Table 2-803, there is no maximum allowable height for Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Projects. Pursuant to the Marina Character District standards of Beach by Design; the maximum building height for those properties having more than one acre on both sides of East Shore Drive is 80 feet. Pursuant to the definition of height as set forth in Article 8, CDC, elevatar equipment rooms are permitted to project up to 16 feet higher than the allowable maximum height. The subject property aggregate (both sides of East Shore Drive) lot area is 1.26 acres and the proposed building height is 73.75 feet to Community Development Board — June 19, 2012 FLD2012-03008 — Page 3 of 10 midpoint of pitched roof and 85.5 feet to midpoint of pitched roof for the elevator tower, which is consistent with the above referenced provisions. Minimum Off-Street Parkin�: Pursuant to CDC Table 2-803, the minimum off-street parking requirements for Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Projects shall be as determined by the Community Development Coordinator based on the specific use andlor ITE Manual standards. However, and as a point of reference, Table 2-803 requires 1.2 spaces per overnight accommodations unit and one space per two dock slips. The 6,500 square feet of restaurant does not require parking as it is accessory to the hotel and less than 15 percent of the overall gross floor axea of the development. The development proposal includes 134 overnight accommodations units and 32 slips for the public requiring a total of 177 spaces. 201 parking spaces are provided exceeding the off-street parking requirement. Parking for the hotel guests, employees and users of the marina is provided in a parking garage (177 spaces) in the first three levels of the hotel as well as a surface parking lot (24 spaces) on the west side of East Shore Drive for a total of 201 parking spaces. Of the 201 spaces, 185 spaces are dedicated to the hotel at 1.38 parking spaces per hotel room. The remaining 16 spaces are dedicated for marina parking. Mechanical Equipment: Pursuant to CDC Section 3-903.H.1, mechanical equipment shall be screened from any public right-of-way and adjacent properties. The proposal includes mechanical equipment located on the second, third and fourth levels of the building including HVAC. All mechanical equipment will be screened from view from adjacent property owners by walls. Si�ht Visibility Trian�les: Pursuant to CDC Section 3-904.A, to minimize hazards at street or driveway intersections, no structures or landscaping may be installed which will obstruct views at a level between 30 inches above grade and eight feet above grade within 20-foot sight visibility triangles. As previously discussed there are three driveways on East Shore Drive (two for the hotel and one for the parking lot). The proposal has been reviewed by the City's Traffic Engineering Department and been found to be acceptable. Utilities: Pursuant to CDC Section 3-912, for development that does not involve a subdivision, all utilities, including individual distribution lines, must be installed underground unless such undergrounding is not practicable. Electric and communication lines for this development will be installed underground on-site in compliance with this requirement. The location of proposed electric panels, boxes and meters for this development is unknown presently. If located exterior to the building, to ensure views are minimized, this electrical equipment should be painted the same color as the building. The location and potential views of such electrical equipment will be addressed at the building permit stage. Landscaping_ Pursuant to CDC Section 3-1202.E.1, 10% of the gross vehicular use area shall be provided within interior landscape islands. The interior landscape area (parking lot) is 8,316 square feet in area and 1,468 square feet (17.6 percent of the vehicular use area) of landscaping is proposed. Sabal and washingtonia palm trees with a variety of underplantings are to be planted. Community Development Board — June 19, 2012 FLD2012-03008 — Page 4 of 10 Pursuant to CDC Section 3-1202.E.2, foundation plantings shall be provided for 100 percent of a building facade with frontage along a street right-of-way, excluding space necessary for building ingress and egress, within a minimum iive-foot wide landscaped area. The proposal includes foundation plantings along the north, south and west building facades within, at a minimum, five-foot wide landscape buffer along the entire building facades excluding space necessary for building ingress and egress. The foundation plantings areas will be planted with silver buttonwood, giant bird of paradise trees, a variety of palm trees and underplantings. The submitted landscape plan complies with Section 3-1202 for interior parking lot and foundation landscaping and should provide adequate visual relief from the scale of the parking levels and structures. Solid Waste: The proposal will utilize a trash compactor and trash staging area located at the southwest corner of the building that is enclosed by walls on three sides. There will be an access gate on East Shore Drive. The proposal also includes landscaping to provide visual relief from the compactor walls. To shield the view of the compactor from guest rooms above, a trellis with mesh screening is provided. Si na e: No freestanding or attached signage is proposed at this time. And while due to site constraints freestanding signage is not expected, freestanding signage in the Tourist District is restricted to a maximum height of four feet, or six feet through a Comprehensive Sign Program. Any approval of this application should include a condition allowing for freestanding signage, where such future freestanding signage must be a monument-style sign meeting Code requirements and be designed to match the exterior materials and color of the building. Any proposed attached signage not meeting minimum Code requirements will be approved through a Comprehensive Sign Program. Additional Beach by Design Guidelines: Section C.1 requires buildings with a footprint of greater than 5,000 square feet to be constructed so that no more than two of the three building dimensions in the vertical or horizontal planes are equal in length. The proposed building footprint is approximately 32,319 squaxe feet. The project's overall horizontal plane dimensions are 266 feet along East Shore Drive (west) and on the east side of the building, and 121.5 feet along Papaya Street (south) and the north side of the building, while the vertical plane is 84.5 feet from ground level to midpoint of the pitched roof. As such, the building is consistent with this guideline. Section C.2 requires no plane or elevation to continue uninterrupted for greater than 100 feet without an offset of more than five feet. All facades of the building are greater than 100 feet in length and include a minimum of one vertical step back per facade to be consistent with the aforementioned provision. Section C.3 requires at least 60 percent of any elevation to be covered with windows or architectural decoration. All building elevations contain windows, and architectural details such as aluminum railings, raised architectural details and changes in materials and colors. The following table outlines the percentages which are consistent with the aforementioned provision. Community Development Board — June 19, 2012 FLD2012-03008 — Page 5 of 10 Exterior Finishes and O enin s Percenta es Table North Elevation South Elevation East Elevation West Elevation Windows 22% Windows 22% Windows 25% Windows 27% Architectural Details 43% Architectural Details 41 % Architectural Details 40% Architectural Details 47% Total: 65% Total: 63% Total: 65% Total: 74% Section C.4 requires that no more than 60 percent of the theoretical m�imum building envelope located above 45 feet be occupied by a building. Based on the building envelope measurements provided by the applicant, 50 percent of the theoretical maximum building envelope is located above 45 feet. As such, the proposal is consistent with the aforementioned provision. Section E.l requires that at least sixty percent 60 percent of the street level facades of buildings used for nonresidential purposes which abut a public street or pedestrian access way, will be transparent. The street-level windows along Papaya Street and the west side of the building are consistent with this provision as much as practicable. Along the west building facade fronting East Shore Drive, the intent of the provision is met through the removal of as much of the ground floor facade wall as much as practicable to create a space inviting to the public. Code Enforcement Analysis: There are no active Code Enforcement cases for the subject property. COMPLIANCE WITH STANDARDS AND CRITERIA: The following table depicts the consistency of the development proposal with the standards as per CDC Section 2-801.1 and Table 2-803 and beach by Design; Standard Proposed Consistent Inconsistent Floor Area Ratio 1.0 0.72 X Impervious Surface Ratio 0.95 0.84 X Minimum Lot Area N/A 54,929 sq. ft. X Minimum Lot Width N/A 315 feet (hotel - East Shore) X 130.84 feet (hotel - Papaya Street) X 100 feet (pazking lot - East Shore) X Minimum Setbacks Front : N/A (Hotel) South: 21.1 feet (to building) X 3 feet (to wood patio) West: Zero feet (to building) X Side: N/A (Hotel) North: 19 feet (to building) X East: 2l 1.4 feet (to building) X Front: N/A East: 8.4 feet (to pavement) X (Accessory Parking Lot) West: 5 feet (to pavement) X Side: N/A North: 5 feet (to pavement) X (Accessory Parking Lot) South: 5 feet (to pavement) X Maximum Height 80 feet through Beach 85.5 feet (midpoint of pitched roof X by Design of elevator shaft) Minimum Off-Street Parkin N/A 201 arkin s aces X Community Development Board — June 19, 2012 FLD2012-03008 — Page 6 of 10 COMPLIANCE WITH FLEXIBILITY CRITERIA: The following table depicts the consistency of the development proposal with the Flexibility criteria as per CDC Section 2-803.0 (Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project): Consistent Inconsistent 1. The development or redevelopment is otherwise impractical without deviations from X the use and/or development standards set forth in this zoning district. 2. The development or redevelopment will be consistent with the goals and policies of X the Comprehensive Plan, as well as with the general purpose, intent and basic planning objectives of this Code, and with the intent and purpose of this zoning district. 3. The development or redevelopment will not impede the normal and orderly X development and improvement of surrounding properties. 4. Adjoining properties will not suffer substantial detriment as a result of the proposed X development. 5. The proposed use shall otherwise be permitted by the underlying future land use X category, be compatible with adjacent land uses, will not substantially alter the essentia] use characteristics of the neighborhood; and shall demonstrate compliance with one or more of the following objectives: a. The proposed use is permitted in this zoning district as a minimum standard, flexible standard or flexible development use; b. The proposed use would be a significant economic contributor to the City's economic base by diversifying the local economy or by creating jobs; c. The development proposal accommodates the expansion or redevelopment of an existing economic contributor; d. The proposed use provides for the provision of affordable housing; e. The proposed use provides for development or redevelopment in an area that is characterized by other similar development and where a land use plan amendment and rezoning would result in a spot land use or zoning designation; or f. The proposed use provides for the development of a new and/or preservation of a working waterfront use. 6. Flexibility with regard to use, lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street X parking are justified based on demonstrated compliance with all of the following design objectives: a. The proposed development will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of the surrounding properties for uses permitted in this zoning district; b. The proposed development complies with applicable design guidelines adopted by the City; c. The design, scale and intensity of the proposed development supports the established or emerging character of an azea; d. In order to form a cohesive, visually interesting and attractive appearance, the proposed development incorporates a substantial number of the following design elements: ❑ Changes in horizontal building planes; ❑ Use of architectural details such as columns, cornices, stringcourses, pilasters, porticos, balconies, railings, awnings, etc.; ❑ Variety in materials, colors and textures; ❑ Distinctive fenestration patterns; ❑ Building step backs; and ❑ Distinctive roofs forms. e. The proposed development provides for appropriate buffers, enhanced landscane desian and apnronriate distances between buildin�s. Community Development Board — June 19, 2012 FLD2012-03008 — Page 7 of 10 COMPLIANCE WITH GENERAL STANDARDS FOR LEVEL TWO APPROVALS: The following table depicts the consistency of the development proposal with the General Standards for Level Two Approvals as per CDC Section 3-914.A: Consistent Inconsistent 1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, X coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage development and use of X adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons X residing or working in the neighborhood. 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. X 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community chazacter of the X immediate vicinity. 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including X visual. acoustic and olfactorv and hours of oneration imnacts on adiacent nronerties. SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION: The Development Review Committee (DRC) reviewed the application and supporting materials at its meetings of April OS and May 03, 2012, and deemed the development proposal to be legally sufficient to move forward to the Community Development Board (CDB), based upon the following: Findings of Fact. The Planning and Development Department, having reviewed all evidence submitted by the applicant and requirements of the Community Development Code, finds that there is substantial competent evidence to support the following findings of fact: 1. That the 1.26-acre subject property is located at the northeast corner of East Shore Drive and Papaya Street; 2. The site is comprised of three parcels, two on the east and one on the west side of East Shore Drive; 3. That the subject property is located in the Tourist (T) District and the Resort Facilities High (RFH) future land use plan category; 4. That the subject property is located within the Marina District of Beach by Design and is subject to all applicable requirements set forth therein; 5. That a companion Development Agreement (DVA2012-03001) which must be approved by City Council is also on this CDB agenda and provides for specific parameters of the project, the project approval and commencement of construction timing provisions and other design considerations; 6. That the properties are previously developed with three single-story buildings containing 42 overnight accommodation units which are to be demolished; 7. That the proposal includes the construction of a 134-unit mid-priced hotel including a 6,500 square foot restaurant, and 201 parking spaces; 8. That the proposal (hotel portion) includes a front (west along East Shore Drive) setback of zero feet (to building), a front (south along Papaya Street) setback of 21.1 feet (to building) and three feet to wood patio, a side (north) setback of 19 feet (to building) and a side (east) setback of 11.4 feet (to building). 9. That the proposal (off-street parking lot) includes a front (east along East Shore Drive) setback of 8.4 feet, a front (west along Poinsettia Street) setback of five feet, a side (north) setback of five feet and a side (south) setback of five feet; Community Development Board — June 19, 2012 FLD2012-03008 — Page 8 of 10 10. That the proposal incorporates a height bonus pursuant to the Marina District of Beach by Design by providing a boardwalk with a minimum width of 15 feet; 1 l. That the proposal includes large expanses of windows, sunshades (providing windows screening from the sun) and finishes commonly found in tropical vernacular architecture such as coral stone and standing seam metal; 12. That a 50-slip dock previously approved under FLD2009-02009 is to be constructed; and 13. That there are no active Code Enforcement cases for the subject property. Conclusions of Law. The Planning and Development Department, having made the above findings of fact, reaches the following conclusions of law: l. That the development proposal is consistent with the Standards as per Community Development Code Tables 2-801.1 and 2-803; 2. That the development proposal is consistent with the Flexibility criteria as per Community Development Code Section 2-803.C; 3. That the development proposal is consistent with the General Standards for Level Two Approvals as per Community Development Code Section 3-914.A; 4. That the development proposal is consistent with the Marina character district of Beach by Design; and 5. That the development proposal is consistent with the Design Guidelines of Beach by Design. Based upon the above, the Planning and Development Department recommends APPROVAL of the Flexible Development approval to permit 1) a 134-unit Overnight Accommodation use (through an increase of the permitted density by the allocation of 71 overnight accommodation units from the Hotel Density Reserve created pursuant to Beach by Design) and 6,500 square feet of restaurant use in the Tourist (T) District with a lot area of 43,415 square feet (0.99 acres), a lot width of 315 feet along East Shore Drive and 137.72 feet along Papaya Street, a front (west along East Shore Drive) setback of zero feet (to building), a front (south along Papaya Street) setback of 21.1 feet (to building) and three feet to wood patio, a side (north) setback of 19 feet (to building), a side (east) setback of 11.4 feet (to building), a building height of 85.5 feet (to midpoint of pitched roo� and 193 parking spaces and 2) an off-street parking lot in the T District with a lot area of 11,514 square feet (0.26 acres), lot widths of 100.4 feet along East Shore Drive and Poinsettia Street, a front (east along East Shore Drive) setback of 8.4 feet (to pavement), a front (west along Poinsettia Street) setback of five feet (to pavement), a side (north) setback of five feet (to pavement), a side (south) setback of five feet (to pavement) and 24 parking spaces and a two year development order as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Community Development Code Section 2-803.C., subject to the following conditions of approval: Conditions of A�proval: 1. That approval of this Flexible Development case is subject to the approval of a Development Agreement with the City (Case DVA2012-03001); 2. That commencement of construction occur by the date as set out in Development Agreement DVA2012-03001; 3. That prior to the issuance of any permits, a Declaration of Unity of Title combining parcels 08-29-15-16434-003-0080, 08-29-15-16434-002-0100 and 08-29-15-16434-003-0100 be recorded in the public records and a copy of said recorded document be provided to the Planning and Development Department; 4. That any applicable Public Art and Design Impact Fee be paid prior to the issuance of any permits; Community Development Board — June 19, 2012 FLD2012-03008 — Page 9 of 10 5. That all Parks and Recreation fees be paid prior to the issuance of any permits; 6. That prior to the issuance of any building permits, the Traffic Engineering condition be met; 7. That prior to the issuance of any building permits, the Fire Department may require the provision of a Water Study performed by a Fire Protection Engineer in order to ensure that an adequate water supply is available and to determine if any upgrades are required by the developer due to the impact of the project. The water supply must be able to support the needs of any required fire sprinkler, standpipe and/or fire pump. If a fire pump is required, then the water supply must be able to supply 150% of its rated capacity. 8. That prior to the issuance of any building permits, the materials and the final design of the boardwalk as well as the provision of any easements require by the City, be coordinated between the applicant and the City; 9. That, prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, an easement be recorded for that portion of the public boardwalk that is located on the subject property; 10. That the books and records pertaining to use of each hotel room be open for inspection by authorized representatives of the City, upon reasonable notice, in order to confirm compliance with the Hotel Density Reserve criteria of Beach by Design as allowed by general law; 11. That all open spaces will be landscaped with Florida Grade #1 plant material with an automatic irrigation system; 12. That all utilities, including individual distribution lines, must be installed underground unless undergrounding is not practicable; 13. That where door openings create a conflict with pedestrian traffic, the width of the boardwalk be widened to a minimum of 15 feet excluding opened doors; 14. That electric panels and meters for this development, if proposed to be outside and in view of adjacent rights-of-way and properties be painted the same color as the building; and 15. That any future freestanding signage must be monument-style meeting Code requirements and be designed to match exterior materials and color of the building. � Prepared by Planning and Development Department Staf£ f''�,�� Matt Jackson, Planner II ATTACHMENTS: Location Map; Aerial Map; Zoning Map; Existing Surrounding Uses Map; and Photographs Community Development Board — June 19, 2012 FLD2012-03008 — Page 10 of 10 View looking northeast at the proposed hotel portion of the subject property View looking south from the subject property View of existing overnight accommodations on the proposed parking lot portion of the subject property View looking north from the subject property View of existing overnight accommodations on the proposed hotel portion of the subject property View looking east from the proposed hotel portion of the subject property 443 East Shore Drive Cases FLD2012-03008/ DVA2012-03001 0 _�+ � r ' 4 t, 9 `��' 1 � �' �,. .e . � '..A' : �� . ^:�.� .. a. ' �"k �� ' ; �1'l�'�l?1�'7�"� l:_ � 'u � .��. , _�_�� . � � � � �y,., �, �. � � �, . � } ;+ �� j i � � y " � ,...� x . ; �� ,. � � , , . t � ' � �� ."C`„' trs .r,,,{=�-• �,« ��p ' * u� i ,r "j �.. *�,:: ' .�`` �' . �'�fT �� ..�. � }� . 4 ` ' . • , '' i ,r"•, '°� "fs'"� "� . �c � +�` . . �: � ei 'd k;}. q 3 t � �" E�.�t, P!+ � . 'r . , . .. �� y ,. r. '�'h� T. �Y � °� Y+R . ' � o- y�. — � �M � $ , � " 'f► J . � � " � � ��`�'� , '�"�. � �!_�. �. � � °� �r � � .w� � � �1�� tii�'��1��" �'r�� i �� E��°��ti � S n � � � �� *. � �'�� ' � � a y�."� � - a {.r . �► " �Jw=� +ly�. ` �, � : '.� � � �� .. p ` � y °=..ii� j ,� ��"��`� ��x� � �"c ,:� k� � � �� .6 A ; N ��y��'* . �` �� N 41P « . . _ , � �-d'"' �'� , . r !J ne. � " � '" �S"�°: r �` , �, ` . : ..,.�.6r..' �r. �, � _ r.� : . > y : �.. � �� r � , ,�,. ., a .k � �:� r� ' •� . J �;�.��1;� :i� * . M i�\� � . ' ' � •7• ,k.� ' ! � ' a . , ; 1(�, � ,r�t" . R % . . �h \ 4 � � l �}. . A . f t� . � . �—! t � �S_ �_1 � ° .n � • , : • � � � •� . , ��_ � � . , �� ,� � �r � * � ��,. ` '�" �, _' Fi � f �r � . ..� �`�� 4' lA {, i�� `�� t �J � . a�� na* ... ; � l � �, 't�-" '�, '�*" �' , '� x � �'-., ". ` . J ' "� � � � � �,. � � . � ,� ' °� r. ,� ��y � '' �jE .;��• �� y��"� }� � #� . �. � � '""�"�' r � ' � 31k ' '- . � ' � � � � r� �� re , � �� . � - � ' ' � ��'1�1, s1-� � � � '� r�...r. �'�i'!► s ? ��t� ' �J - �� ,� � f . P ; �� i � � � � � � — i , - _� , , .r. , i—""'iaaiA�i4 -r � ,� r � � � . � r.. � � �� k ' � � �" � � �. . � ' � _ �� , i � �i � �u i � ' � ; �' � : � •, iF �i , _�� .-� � �� 1 k � . • , �` , , — � J • "»` � ,j�' � ^ �' . �. ►"�� ..-�+a . 4 . «� • � ' '� - � s�: � � � � p� +� �' y � ,.� ..i"%.... � ! r``.r " �� a . # f � �� ,� �«, ,� � +� �► ' , ` � � � � � » � � � ,� � � t � , ' � ,� � � ' , i_ k !�� p.. � �r , . '�}M $ 1 ="�� •�.,�'.. � , _ `' ` �: ys . Owner: Site PIN AERIAL Louis Development LLC 462 and 463, East Shore 08-29-15-16434-003-0080, 08-29-1 5-1 6434- 003-0 l 00, 08-29-15-16434-002-0 l 00 Case: Property Size: Atlas Page: FLD2012-03008/ DVA2012- 03001 1.26 acres 267A � 500 '�rs� — - sZ� �5 � � ao - 59 490 I � � �" so I� st �j I � s2 — � � 2 63 � cMO � L�� 8 �- � �. 4 4 ^IN 4�0 � �J � � �z 4s ��aer �3 4 r_. _4 as ' —�—., L 46T �= �� ? _ �� 453?[ �s 45� c,�i I� 451 22 80 _ 4��- J �r'-�� 81 Zo � BAYMONT ST 38 �� S2 �"' � so � °' $ W --, �43� ? .- �' , y � � �� I Q � i z ;3 432 � � z436 ; 43� 4 a� h 430I ,�g � 40 � 439 g — � Q — �—� as � Z 4a28 0 I' � �3 0 �_ 38 _� 4� 429 5426 11 � � 415 j2 37 � � �6— � 413 t3 1 � i 422 � � d11 �e A 36 I I_ 7 � 16 17 r— �p � 34 s � a � � 465 ■ � r ass 9 � r Q • 10 — �� '- - P r� 4 • » r �--- � 12 r �� a �441 � 425 2 � 423 3 — 4 — — — — � 4>59 _ _ _ — — —6— — — — — — 7 ' �6 — — — — — — q 9 — — — — — r— --� �18135 � � - --� { 86480 � EXISTING Owner: Louis Development LLC Case: Site: 462 and 463, East Shore Property Size PIN: 08-29-15-16434-003-0080, 08-29-15-16434- Atlas Page: 003-0100, 08-29-15-16434-002-0100 _ CLEA � z � z HARBOR FLD2012-03008/ DVA2012- 03001 1.26 acres 267A Matthew Jackson 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, Florida 33756 (727)562-4504 matthew.iackson(a�mvclearwater.com PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE ❑ Planner II City of Clearwater, Clearwater, Florida May 2011 to Present October 2008 to June 2010 Regulate growth and development of the City in accordance with land resource ordinances and regulations related to community development. Landscape plan review including: conceptual, and variance. Reviews and analyzes site plans and conducts field studies to determine the integrity of development plans and their compatibility with surroundings. Interdepartmental and zoning assistance. Respond as a City representative to citizens, City officials, and businesses concerning ordinances and regulations. Make recommendations and presentations at staff level at various review committees, boards, and meetings. ❑ Planner I Calvin-Giordano and Associates, Fort Lauderdale, Florida May 2005 to December 2007 Project manager for various development applications such as plat, site plan, rezoning and variances. In-depth government agency, in-house and client coordination to ensure that the projects maintained submittal schedules stayed within budget constraints and attained approval. Schedule and lead project kick-off ineetings, ensure municipal project conditions were resolved, produce supporting documents and make site visits as well. Research and prepare due diligence reports including subject matter such as zoning, land uses, densities, available public utilities and land development costs. Member of emergency mitigation committee formed to prepare and mitigate for natural or man-made disasters affecting Calvin, Giordano and Associates and local municipalities. ❑ Manager Church Street Entertainment, Orlando, Florida September 1999 to February 2004 Supervised and managed daytime and nighttime operations of a bar and nightclub entertainment complex including 100+ staf£ Conducted hiring and training operations including security and inventory control. Managed and reconciled nightly gross revenues as well as preparing and delivering deposits. Assisted in taking inventory and preparing weekly inventory orders, marketing and special events. ❑ Linguist US Army, Fort Campbell, KY October 1991 to October 1995 Maintain fluency in the Arabic language and knowledge of customs and culture as well as military readiness for possible deployments or training operations. Co-managed intelligence gathering operation in Haiti including coordination between multiple Special Forces units and civilian authorities. Interpreter between U.S. and Egyptian soldiers during training exercises. Liaison between Special Forces battalions to coordinate certification training. EDUCATION ❑ Master of Arts, Urban and Regional Planning, Florida Atlantic University, 200'7 ❑ Bachelor of Arts, Urban and Regional Planning, Rollins College, 2004 � , �] C�+��:r�v�.ter _� -..._."`�-,. Planning Department 100 South Myrtle Av�i�:ue Clearwater, Fiorida 33756 Telephone: 727-562-��567 Fax: 727-562-4865 ❑ SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION ❑ SUBMIT 14 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION - Plans and application are required to be collated, stapled, and folded into sets ❑ SUBMIT FIRE PRELIMARY SITE PLAN: $200.00 ❑ SUBMIT APPLICATION FEE CASE #: RECEIVED BY (staff initials): �_ - • � ' i, DATE RECEIVED: � „ w se ontt E 443 EAST SHORE DR FLD;��'t►_'� .��p� 1 Courtyard by Marriott Atlas #: 267A Zoning: Tourist �` NOTE: 15 TOTAL SETS OF INFORMATION REQUIRED (APPLICATIONS PLUS SITE PLAN SETS) FLE�IBLE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION � Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project ' Revised 07/11/2008 �PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT� A. APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A) APPLICANT NAME: Louis Developments LLC MAILING ADDRESS: 630 South Gulfview Blvd. Clearwater, FL 33767-2642 _. PHONE NUMBER: 727-443-2869 _ FAX NUMBER: 727-446-8036 __ CELLNUMBER 727-709-0943 _ EMAIL: housh@northsideengineering.net PROPERTY OWNER(S): List ALL owners on the deed AGENT NAME: MAILING ADDRESS: PHONE NUMBER: CELL NUMBER: Louis Developments LLC Northside Engineering Services, Inc. Housh Ghovaee - CEO 300 South Selcher Road Clearwater, FL 33765 _ _ _ 727-443-2869 FAX NUMBER: 727-446-8036 727-709-0943 EMAIL: nicholas@northsideengineering.net B. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A) Court ard b Marriott (Proposed) PROJECTVALUATION: $ 14,000,000.00 PROJECT NAME: Y Y __ - STREETADDRESS 443, 460, 462, 463, 465 East Shore Drive PARCELNUMBER(5): 08-29-15-16434-003-0080, 08-29-15-16434-003-0100, 08-29-15-16434-002-0100 PARCEL SIZE (acres): 1. 26 Acres _ __ PARCEL SIZE (square feet): 54 , 929 S. F._ _ LEGALDESCRIPTION: See attached legal description _ _ __ _ ___ __ — PROPOSED USE(S): Overnight Accomodations DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST: See attached narrative Specifically identify the request _ (include number of units or square -- footage of non-residential use and all _—__ requested code deviations; e.g. reduction in required number of — — parking spaces, specific use, etc.) C:\Documents and Settings\derek.ferguson\Desktop\planning dept forms 0708\Comprehensive Infill Project (FLD) 2008 07-11.doc Page 1 of 8 ;, �,'� , I \1�J� 1 � ` � ` � `�, ' U DOES THIS APPLICATION INVOLVE THE TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS (TDR), A PREVIOUSLY APPR��tRI�I��UN� DEVELOPMENT, OR A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED (CERTIFIED) SITE PLAN? YES _ NO X (if yes, attach a.copy of the applicable documents) G. PROOF OF OWNERSHIP: (Code Section 4-202.A.5) LI SUBMIT A COPY OF THE TITLE INSURANCE POLICY, DEED TO THE PROPERTY OR SIGN AFFIDAVIT ATTESTING OWNERSHIP (see page 7) D. WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 3-913.A) f� Provide complete responses to the six (6) GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA — Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail: 1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. See attached narrative 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. See attached narrative 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use. See attached narrative 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. See attached narrative 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. See attached narrative 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts, on adjacent properties. See attached narrative C:\Documents and Settings\derek.ferguson\Desktop\planning dept forms 0708\Comprehensive Infill Project (FLD) 2008 07-11.doc Page 2 of 8 � � WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project Cr��gC��)jj;� � ❑ Provide complete responses to the six (6) COMPREHENSIVE INFILL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT CRITERIA — Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail: 1. The development or redevelopment is otherwise impractical without deviations from the use and/or development standards set forth in this zoning district. See attached narrative 2. The development or redevelopment will be consistent with the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan, as well as with the generai purpose, intent and basic planning objectives of this Code, and with the intent and purpose of this zoning district See attached narrative 3. The development or redevelopment will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of surrounding properties. See attached narrative 4. Adjoining properties will not suffer substantial detriment as a result of the proposed development. See attached narrative 5. The proposed use shall otherwise be permitted by the underlying future land use category, be compatible with adjacent land uses, will not substantially alter the essential use characteristics of the neighborhood; and shall demonstrate compliance with one or more of the following objectives: a. The proposed use is permitted in this zoning district as a minimum standard, flexible standard or flexible development use; b. The proposed use would be a significant economic contributor to the City's economic base by diversifying the local economy or by creating jobs; c. The development proposal accommodates the expansion or redevelopment of an existing economic contributor; d. The proposed use provides for the provision of affordable housing; e. The proposed use provides for development or redevelopment in an area that is characterized by other similar development and where a land use plan amendment and rezoning wou�d result in a spot land use or zoning designation; or f. The proposed use provides for the development of a new and/or preservation of a working waterfront use. See attached narrative 6. Flexibility with regard to use, lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street parking are justified based on demonstrated compliance with all of the following design objectives: a. The proposed development will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of the surrounding properties for uses permitted in this zoning district; b. The proposed development complies with applicable design guidelines adopted by the City; c. The design, scale and intensity of the proposed development supports the established or emerging character of an area; d. In order to form a cohesive, visually interesting and attractive appearance, the proposed development incorporates a substantial number of the following design elements: ❑ Changes in horizontal building planes; ❑ Use of architectural details such as columns, cornices, stringcourses, pilasters, porticos, balconies, railings, awnings, etc.; ❑ Variety in materials, colors and textures; ❑ Distinctive fenestration patterns; ❑ Building stepbacks; and ❑ Distinctive roofs forms. e. The proposed development provides for appropriate buffers, enhanced landscape design and appropriate distances between buildings. See attached narrative C:\Documents and Settings\derek.ferguson\Desktop\planning dept forms 0708\Comprehensive �nfill Project (FLD) 2008 07-11.doc Page 3 of 8 0 E. STORM1n/ATE�t PLkN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (City of Clearwater Storm Drai,ra��ge��D�e�;�q�i�'f�'tit%li�� Manual and 4-202.A.21) �.'7 A STORMWATER NARRATIVE MUST BE SUBMITTED WITH ALL APPLICATIONS�. All applications that involve addition or modification of impervious surface, including buildings, m�.�s! b-:.:iude a stormwater plan that demonstrates compliance with the City of Clearwater 5torm Drainage Design Criteria manual. A reduclion in impervious surface area does not qualify as an exemption to this requirement. G If a plan is not required, the narrative shall provide an explanatirn as to why the site is exempt. �I At a minimum, the STORMWATER PLAN shall include the following; � Existing topography e�ending 50 feet beyond all property lines; � Proposed grading including finished floor elevations of all structures; � All adjacent streets and municipal storm systems; � Proposed, stormwater detention/retention area including top of bank, toe of slope and outlet control structure; �I A narrative describing the proposed stormwater control plan including all calculations and data necessary to demonstrate compliance with the City manuaL L�] Proposed stormwater detention/retention area including top of bank, toe of slope and outlet control structure; f� Signature and seal of Florida Registered Professional Engineer on all plans and calculations. ❑ COPY OF PERMIT INQUIRY LETTER OR SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT (SWFWMD) PERMIT SUBMITTAL (SWFWMD approval is required prior to issuance of City Building Permit), if applicable ❑ ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF STORMWATER PLAN REQUIREMENTS (Appiicant must initial one of the following): H. G. Stormwater plan as noted above is included Stormwater plan is not required and explanation narrative is attached. At a minimum, a grading plan and finished floor elevations shall be provided. CAUTION — IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A STORMWATER PLAN AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 562-4750. F. SUPPLEMENTAL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 4-202.A) �I SIGNED AND SEALED SURVEY (including legal description of property) — One original a'nd 14 copies; U TREE SURVEY (including existing trees on site and within 25' of the adjacent site, by species, size (DBH 4" or greater), and location, including drip lines and indicating trees to be removed) — please design around the existing trees; ❑ ) TREE INVENTORY; prepared by a"certified arborisY', of all t�Pes °�" DpBH or greater, reflectin size, canopy (drip lines) `an�d condition of _,;� suchtrees,Q',Ct' T��5GuS6ia�S ik-"'�"l�J'[t.n �a\c�..d hQ��S ct+.d �.tCk �:�� %Vv'C �Q�,i.i�t.}'�'G� C� LOCATION MAP OF THE PROPERTY; ❑ PARKING DEMAND STUDY in conjunction with a request to make deviations to the parking standards (ie. Reduce number of spaces). Prior to the submittal of this application, the methodology of such study shall be approved by the Community Development Coordinator and shall be in accordance with accepted traffic engineering principles. The findings of the study will be used in determining whether or not deviations to the parking standards are approved; Not Required � GRADING PLAN, as applicable; ❑ PRELIMINARY PLAT, as required (Note: Building permits will not be issued until evidence of recording a final plat is provided); ❑ COPY OF RECORDED P�AT, as applicable; C:\Documents and Settings\derek.ferguson\Desktop\planning dept forms 0708\Comprehensive Infill Project (FLD) 2008 07-11.doc Page 4 of 8 � G. SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A) L� SITE PLAN with the following information (not to exceed 24" x 36"): H. G Index sheet referencing individual sheets included in package; H . G . North arrow; � � H. G. Engineering bar scale (minimum scale one inch equals 50 feet), and date prepared; H.G. Alldimensions; H. G. Footprint and size of all EXISTING buildings and structures; H. G. Footprint and size of all PROPOSED buildings and structures; H. G. All required setbacks; H. G. All existing and proposed points of access; H.G. Alirequiredsighttriangles; Identification of environmentally unique areas, such as watercourses, wetlands, tree masses, and specimen trees, including H. G. description and location of understory, ground cover vegetation and wildlife habitats, etc; Location of all public and private easements; H. G. Location of all street rights-of-way within and adjacent to the site; Location of existing public and private utilities, including fire hydrants, storm and sanitary sewer lines, manholes and lift stations, gas H. G. and water lines; H. G. All parking spaces, driveways, loading areas and vehicular use areas; H. G. Depiction by shading or crosshatching of all required parking lot interior landscaped areas; Location of all solid waste containers, recycling or trash handling areas and outside mechanical equipment and all required screening H.G. {perSection3-201(D)(i)andlndex#701}; H. G. Location of all landscape material; H. G. Location of alI onsite and offsite storm-water manager��ent f�cilities; n. v. �vCBiivii Oi aii GiiiuGvf iiyiiiiiiy iii:'iiiicS; . H. G. Location of aIl existing and proposed sidewalks; and Floor plan typicals of buildings for all Level Two approvals. A floor plan of each floor is required for any parking garage requiring a H. G. Level Two approval. SITE DATA TABLE for existing, required, and proposed development, in written/tabular form: H. G. Land area in square feet and acres; H.G. Numberof EXISTING dwelling units; H. G. Number of PROPOSED dwelling units; H. G. Gross floor area devoted to each use; Parking spaces: total number, presented in tabular form with the H. G. number of required spaces; Total paved area, including all paved parking spaces & driveways, H_� • expressed in square feet & percentage of the paved vehicular area; Official records book and page numbers of all existing utility H . G . easement; H. G. Building and structure heights; H.G. Impermeable surface ratio (I.S.R.); and H. G. Floor area ratio (F.A.R.) for all nonresidential uses. REDUCED COLOR SITE PLAN to scale (8 Yz X 11); EXISTING REQUIRED PROPOSED SEE SITE DATA TABLE FOR ALL ITEMS --ir— n— --n n ❑ FOR DEVELOPMENTS OVER ONE ACRE, provide the following additional information on site plan: Each remote site is less One-foot contours or spot elevations on site; than 1 Acre . Offsite elevations if required to evaluate the proposed stormwater management for the parcel; All open space areas; Location of all earth or water retaining walls and earth berms; Lot lines and building lines (dimensioned); Streets and drives (dimensioned); Building and structural setbacks (dimensioned); Structural overhangs; C:\Documents and Settings\derek.ferguson\Desktop\p!ar�ning dept forms 0708\Comprehensive Infill Project (FLD) 2008 07-11.doc °ay� 5 Of 8 � H. LANDSCAPING PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-1102.A) � LANDSCAPE PLAN with the foliowing information (not to exceed 24" x 36"): H.G.AII existing and proposed structures; H. G. Names of abutting streets; H. G. Drainage and retention areas including swales, side slopes and bottom elevations; H. G: Delineation and dimensions of all required perimeter landscape, buffers; H. G. Sight visibility triangles; H. G. Delineation and dimensions of all parking areas including landscaping islands and curbing; Existing trees on-site and immediately adjacent to the site, by species, size and locations, including driplines (as indicated on required H . G . tree survey); Location, size, and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, indicated by a key relating to the plant H . G . schedule; Plant schedule with a key (symbol or label) indicating the size, description, specifications, quantities, and spacing requirements of all H. G. existing and proposed landscape materials, including botanical and common names; Typical planting details for trees, palms, shrubs and ground cover plants including instructions, soil mixes, backfilling, mulching and H.G. protectivemeasures; Interior landscaping areas hatched and/or shaded and labeled and interior landscape coverage, expressing in both square feet and H . G . percentage covered; H. G. Conditions of a previous development approval (e.g. conditions imposed by the Community Development Board); H.G. Irrigation notes. C� REDUCED COLOR LANDSCAPE PLAN to scale (8'/z X 11); L�3 COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM application, as applicable. Landscape associated with the Comprehensive Landscape Program shall exceed minimum Code requirements to offset the areas where minimum Code will not be met. I. BUILDING ELEVATION PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A.23) � BUILDING ELEVATION DRAWINGS — with the following information: H. G. All sides of all buildings „ H . G': Dimensioned ' -� `- f-�-��-�% H. G. Colors (provide one full sized set of colored elevations) H . G . Materials L] REDUCED BUILDING ELEVATIONS — same as above to scale on 8 Yz X 11 J. SIGNAGE: (Division 19. SIGNS / Section 3-1806) „ n�one proposed at this time. ❑ All EXISTING freestanding and attached signs; Provide photographs and dimensions (area, height, etc.), indicate whether they will be removed or to remain. ❑ All PROPOSED freestanding and attached signs; Provide details including location, size, height, colors, materials and drawing; freestanding signs shall include the street address (numerals) C] Comprehensive Sign Program application, as applicable (separate application and fee required). ❑ Reduced signage proposal (8 Yz X 11) (color), if submitting Comprehensive Sign Program application. C:\Documents and Settings\derek.ferguson\Desktop\planning dept forms 0708\Comprehensive Infill Project (FLD) 2008 07-11.doc Page 6 of 8 � K. TRAFFIC IMPAGT STUDY: (Section 4-202.A.13 and 4-801.C) ❑ Include if required by the Traffic Operations Manager or his/her designee or if the proposed development: Will degrade the acceptable level of service for any roadway as adopted in the Comprehensive Plan. Will generate 100 or more new vehicle directional trips per hour and/or 1000 or more new vehicle trips per day. Will aifect a nearby roadway segment and/or intersection with five (5) reportable accidents within the prior twelve (12) month period or that is on the City's annual list of most hazardous intersections. ' Trip generation shall be based on the most recent edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineer's (ITE) Trip General Manual. The Traffic Impact Study must be prepared in accordance with a"Scoping Meeting" held with the Traffic Operations Manager and the Planning Department's Development Review Manager or their designee (727-562-4750) Refer to Section 4-801 C of the Community Development Code for exceptions to this requirement. C� Acknowledgement of traffic impact study requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following): Traffic Impact Study is included. The study must include a summary table of pre- and post-deve opment levels of ervice for all � roadway legs and each turning movement at all intersections identified in the Scoping Meeting. ��rd �ti ded � Traffic Impact Study is not required. CAUTION — IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 562- 4750. L. FIRE FLOW CALCULATIONS/ WATER STUDY: Provide Fire Flow Calculations. Water Study by a FIRE PROTECTION ENGINEER to assure an adequate water supply is available and to determine if any upgrades are required by the developer due to the impact of this project. The water supply must be able to support the needs of any required fire sprinkler, standpipe and/or fire pump. If a fire pump is required the water supply must be able to supply 150% of its rated capacity. Compliance with the 2004 Florida Fire Prevention Code to include NFPA 13, MFPA 14, NFPA 20, NFPA 291, and MFPA 1142 (Annex H) is required. �l Acknowledgement of fire ilow calculations/water study requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following): Fire Flow Calculations/Water Study is included. �,� e��,d�d ��r�.�...4 � �e� �-�st- Fire Flow Calculations/Water Study is not required. CAUTION — IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A FIRE FLOW CALCULATIONS/ WATER STUDY AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questioris regarding these requirements, contact the City Fire Prevention Department at (727) 562-4334. fLc �lD �,J C�4� c6 '`.o �e 'F'r+aeli � ee( � c'+1a /' '% �G.t'r+ �-��,' �+4 M. SIGNATURE: I, the undersigned, acknowledge that all representations made in thi a lication are true and accurate to the best of my kno I� ge and authorize City representatives to visit and ph to raph the property described in this application. ignature of property owiier or representative STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS�y Sworn to an subscribed before me this _��_ day of } , A.D. 20_�L to me and/or by ho i personally known has produced � . �. . as identification. �' �''�""�" }�'' ' _..._.._._....__ __....._._..____ ___.....�_.__.... _._. ...__..l..........-,... ..._ ______ _ __ ___._ . .. Notary public, �t�} � . �i ,�,e% �,�,. My commission expires: ��e � �`� ��-� r- ptp.PY PUei C:\Documents and Settings\derek.ferguson\Desktop\planning dept forms 0708\Co� �e s'��v�,��+��4��8 07-11.doc Page 7 of 8 EXPIRES; May 3, 2014 N��rFOF F��\O! Bonded ThN Budget No�2ry Services N. AFFIDAVIT TO AUTHORIZE AGENT: 1. Provide names of all properry owners on deed — PRINT full names: Louis Developments, LLC � 2. That (I am/we are) the owner(s) and record title holder(s) of the following describetl property (address or general location): 443, 460, 462, 463 and 465 East Sho:re Drive 3. That this property constitutes the property for which a request for a: (describe request) Comprehensive In-fill Re-Deveopment Application to allow Overnight Accommodati.ons on site 4. That the undersigned (has/have) appointed and (does/do) appoint: Housh Ghovaee, CEO, Northside Engineering Services, Inc. as (his/tf�eir) agent(s)-to execute any petitions or other documents necessary to affect such petition; 5. That this affidavit has been executed to induce the City of Clearwater, Florida to consider and act on the above described property; 6. That site visits to the property are necessary by City representatives in order to process this application and lhe owner authorizes City representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application; 7. That (I/we), the undersigned authority, hereby certify that the foregoing is true and correct. � �_I c_.:.r. �f� c��_� <ct'-.�_ i ' '£ _s_^_ _%'% � — ------ ropert�Owner - - -- - - Property Owner :iTATE Of= FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS Property Owner Property Owner Before me the undersigned, an officer duly commissioned by the laws of the State of Florida, on lhis /��1 _ day of /1 � -------- --- — --- �L�_/ �__ personally appear�d �/J �� '�S%% i� f�� J who having been first duly sworn __ �,��_ �-- �� _.--_-,. Depo � Eur� �r� � e c� (ents of the affidavit that he/she signed. .��S�Y'pUe��% �r , �; Notary Pubiic - State ol Fiorida '•' :•; My Comm. Expires Sep 16, 2013 J =?, e:� Commfssion # DD 925254 � - ,rF d ;•� .� / '��°;�� " Bonded Through Nalional Notary Assn. /! �� ` L° �"� -,�-i- ---- . _ .<�---�'-� ---=� ------- ----------- �� t%� Notary Pub Signature Notary Seal/Stamp My Commission Expires � �i:��-L� -- ��------- C:\Documents and Sellings\derek.ferguson\Deskfiop\planning dept forms 0708\Coinprehensive Infill Project (FLD) 2008 07-11.doc Page 8 of 8 � LET�'ER � F AUTH L7 RIZATI O`�I�I� This letter will serve as authorization for Housh Ghovaee (agent Name) with Northside Enqineering Services, Inc. to act as an agent for Louis Development, LLC - (Property Owner's Name) And to execute any and all documents related to securing permits and approvals for the construction on the property generally located at 443, 460, 462, 463 and 465 East Shore Drive (Property Location) PINELLAS County, State of FLORIDA. ; = [-,�_ �:.,L i � t. i.�;l 'l<"��i'/�lC .�t.�--''' Signature of Property bwner r: %� � �?L��f�'>l.u� 1 JI�C�' Address of Property Owner � �/ ��.�J � � �� `.� ,��1��' � Print Name of Property Owne , " r�s r�°-c�r � Title ��j;��r��-�j�{� �/ L�..� ��"� %.�7_ �,i�j ��,.,�� City/State/Zip Code Telephone Number State of �� "'l �l �� The foregoing instrument was acknowledge before me this � y� day County of �/,�' �7 � of L��__, 20�, by �/% � /H/7 ��'�'�i� J/i''�.r"`� 1 c��?!� �_ � who is personally known to me or who has produced ------- identification and who did (did not) take an oath. `��y p ��i� KATHERINE J LED9ETTER ..� w . �i �: Notary Public - State of florida i •: My Cortm. Expires Sep 16, 2013 ' %? �� Commission � DO 925254 -��--� ,,� j ��°� � �"', Bonded Throuph Nalional Notary Ass�r �' � � " � ;�� (Signature� � � Commission # �/7 �,-x j��,! S`-� Notary Public (SEAL ABOVE) ��tt�/;l%-(' ,G��,;%��%)`' (Name of Notary Typed, Printed or Stamped) ��J � � �'��3'�� E �'��- ��'�?%f,�'�,t,'�r 'I��. May 14, 2012 City of Clearwater Planning & Developinent Review Department Matthew Jackson, Planner II 100 S. Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, Florida 33756 IZE: DVA 2012-03041 and FLD 2012-03008 - 443 East Shore Drive Dear Mr. Jackson, Civil [_ancl Planning Due (�ili�ence Reparts Re-Zoning, LancJ Use, flnnexation Storn7water Management Utility Design Tr�ffic Cnnstr�ictian F�diriinistration Below please find our responses to the 2"a set of DRC comments associated with the above referenced proj ect: FLD2012-03008 Engineerin� Review — Status Met - in association with CDB Environmental Review — Status Met - in association with CDB Fire Review — Status Met - in association with CDB Parks and Recreation Review - Status Met - in association with CDB Planning Review 1. Restauz•ant is proposed at 6,500 sq. ft. — Please see revised Site Data Table. 2. The 45' theoretical maximum building envelope is illustrated on Arch. Sheet 8 and now includes the requested calculations. 3. No Item #3. 4. Please see revised Architectural and Civil Plans providing a main entrance that is more open as per our discussions. 5. The area along the west side of the rainp has remained unchanged due structural restrains and safety concerns expressed by the Developer. 6. A solid wall has been provided at trash staging are per your request. See architectural sheets 5& 7 7. Please see Color Samples provided by the Architect within this resubmission. 8. By way of this letter the Developer/Applicant formally withdraws his request for a 3 year Development Order. 300 South Belcher f�oad Ciearwater, (=lorida 337G5 tech �northsicleen�;ineeringservices.cam 727 4�43 7_BG9 f=a;: 7Z7 �1�+G 803f.� 1 Public Art Review - Status Met - in association with CDB Stormwater Review - Status Met - in association with CDB Traffc En�ineerin� Review Prior to Community Development Board A 10' transition ramp at top and bottom'/2 the slope has been provided on sheet 1 per code section 3- 1402 1.9. We trust this inforination is sufficient to respond to the 2°d set of DRC comments and allow the project to move forward to the Community Development Board on June 19, 2012. Please feel free to contact us if you have questions or require additional infoi�nation and we will respond immediately. Sincere � enee Ruggiero, enior Project Pla er Northside Engineering Services, Inc. Courtyard by Marriott -�ast Shore NES 1023 — Response to 2"d DRC Comment 05.14..2012 RMR/rmr � � ' , April 12, 2012 City of Clearwater Planning & Development Review Department Matthew Jackson, Planner II 100 S. Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, Florida 33756 RE: DVA 2012-03001 and FLD 2012-03008 - 443 East Shore Drive Dear Mr. Jackson, Civil Land Pl�nning Due Di(igence Rep<7rts Re-�oning, Lanci Use, Ann�xaiiQn Stormwater Management Utility Desi�n Tr.�ffic Constr-uction Administra;ian Below please find our responses to the DRC comments associated with the above referenced proj ect: DVA2012-03001 En�ineering Review GN: # 1— Acknowledged, additional comments may be forth coming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. Fire Review 1. Acknowledged, must meet conditions on FLD2012-03008. Legal Review Items 1. —17. Please see revised Development Agreement all have requested revisions have been addressed (2 copies of redlined document provided - 1-copy for Planning and 1- copy for Legal) Parks and Recreation Review l. Acknowledged, must meet conditions on FLD2012-03008. Planning Review 1. Please see revised Development Agreement 2. Please see revised Narrative and Plans providing a 6,500 sq. ft restaurant. 3. Item 3. — 11. Please see revised Development Agreement Public Art Review 1. Acknowledged, Public Art fee is due and payable on this project prior to issuance of a Building Construction Permit. Stormwater Review 1. Acknowledged, must meet conditions on FLD2012-03008 Traffic En�ineerin� Review l. Acknowledged, must meet conditions on FLD2012-03008 3t�Q Scrut�7 �elch�r Road Clearwat�r, Florida 33765 1 tech t�t northsideen�ine�ringservices.com 727 443 2$69 Fax 72i 4�I6 8036 FLD2012-03008 Engineering Review — Engineering Comments - Prior to the issuance of a Building Permit 1. Acknowledged, Civil Sheets C6.1 and C6.2 have not been reviewed in detail - Detailed review to be provided during building permitting process — General Notes: 1. DRC is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review — Additional comments may be forthcoming. Utilities Comments — Prior to the issuance of a Building Permit Water: Items 1. — 6. Acknowledged and shall be provided prior to issuance of building permit. Sewer: Acknowledged, design must follow city sewer details, reclaimed water is available to the site and meter locations shall be shown prior to issuance of building permit. Environmental Review 1. Acknowledged, an Asbestos Survey is usually required prior to conducting any demolition or renovations. 2. Acknowledged, DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. Fire Review 1. A new hydrant is provided at southwest corner of site and is within 300' of the building on the same side of the street. An additional hydrant is located just north of the site on the west side of East Shore; should a 3ra hydrant be required within 300' of the site, it will be shown prior to issuance of Building Permit. 2. Acknowledged, please see revised civil plans providing the hydrant before the Double Detector Check Valve. 3. Acknowledged, please see revised civil plans providing a 2'/2" hose value being supplied from the fire pump. 4. Acknowledged, automatic Class 1 standpipe system with a Fire Pump is required with 100 PSI at roof and shall be located above BFE. 5. Acknowledged, the dumpster will be sprinkled and will have a lattice type cover (as per Planning Depts. request to shield the dumpster from above and will meet sanitations clearance requirements for height.) All items associated with dumpster shall be addressed prior to permitting and acceptable to Fire, Sanitation and Planning. 6. Note provided on architectural sheet 1. 7. Note provided on architectural sheet 1. 8. Please see revised Landscape Plan providing a Shell Pathway along the north side of the building for fire fighting purposes. Please note a gate has been added to the north end of the boardwalk to provide access for fire to the north pathway. 9. Acknowledged, docks shall meet the NFPA-303, 2006 Fire Protection Standard for Marinas and Boatyards. 2 10. Note provided on architectural sheet 1. 11. Acknowledged, project must meet the requirements of Ordinance 7617-06 Radio Systems Regulations for Buildings prior to issuance of Building Permit. 12. Acknowledged, additional issues/items may arise and will be addressed at building permit stage. 13. Acknowledged, Fire Flow Calculations./Study required prior to permitting. Parks and Recreation Review Acknowledged, open space/recreation impact fees are due prior to issuance of building permits. Planning Review 1. Restaurant is proposed at 6,500 sq. ft. and is reflected as such in all documents and plans. 2. The 45' theoretical maximum building envelope is illustrated on arch. Sheet 8. 3. Northwest tower location has been clarified arch. Sheet 8. 4. Please see revised plans providing a 10' sidewalk along East Shore as per your request. 5. Grid grills have been clarified on arch. Sheets 5& 7. 6. Additional arch. details have been added on first floor arch. sheets 5& 7. 7. Colors have been revised per staff suggestion arch. sheets 5, 6& 7. 8. Louvered sunshades have been added arch. sheets 6& 7. 9. Wheel Stops have been removed from all Turnaround Zones. 10. Please see revised plan providing a 15' boardwalk along the entire length of the boardwalk. 11. Acknowledged, valet discussion removed from narrative. 12. Acknowledged, development shall comply with the MPO countywide approach to the application of Concurrency management for transportation facilities. 13. Please see revised drop off area within the ground floor, the redesign allows area for 5 cars. 14. Additional drop off area adjacent to East Shore has been removed from plans and design. 15. Please revised design of the ground floor, improved functionality provided. 16. Please see revised pedestrian entrance; the entrances are more pronounced for a more welcoming appearance, decorative lighted bollards are denoted within the span of the pedestrian entrances and a new sunshade is proposed to more define the entrances. Brick pavers are also provided to better delineate the pedestrian areas and walkways. 17. Eaves have been reduced arch. sheet 5, 6& 7. 18. All roof materials have been clarified arch. sheets 5, 6& 7. 19. All awnings have been replaced with louvered sunshades per staff's suggestion. arch. sheets 5, 6&7 20. Two Handicap parking spaces provided on the ground floor with the remaining 5 spaces being accomplished on the upper levels of the garage, please see Civil plans (for ground floor) and Architects plans (for upper level of garage). 21. Please see revised Civil Staking Plan providing the areas of the landscape islands within the remote parking lot. 22. Acknowledged, a Declaration of Unity of Title shall be recorded and provided to the Planning Dept. prior to the issuance of any permits. 23. Please see revised ground floor plan with added signage, relocated crosswalks and revised flow for increased safety. We will work with Traffic Engineering to locate placement of necessary convex mirrors or other safety measures as needed. (See Note added to Civil Sheet C3.1) 24. The ground floor parking plan has been revised and now only provides 2 spaces within the parking row along the north side of the elevators and the required 4' back up area is shown and provides the required maneuverability. 25. Note has been removed on west elevation. 26. Material and color have been clariiied at west fa�ade. 27. Openings have been clarified on arch. sheets 5, 6& 7. 28. Third floor S.S. mtl. roof has been clarified arch. sheet 8. 29. Please see dedication information within the provided Development Agreement. 30. A new more prominent entrance has been provided arch. sheet 5. 31. Building colors have been revised. See arch. renderings. 32. Please see revised Civil Staking Plan providing the areas of the landscape islands within the remote parking lot. 33. Please see revised Landscape Plan, "New Valet Lobby" language removed. 34. Acknowledged, please see revised Landscape Plan. 35. Please see revised Landscape Plan which is coordinated with the Site Plan 36. Acknowledged, plans provide the 5' minimum landscape buffer along the outer perimeters of the remote parking lot, some yards/areas exceed the 5' minimum. 37. Please see revised Landscape Plan. Public Art Review 1. Acknowledged, Public Construction Permit. Stormwater Review Art fee is due and payable on this project prior to issuance of a Building Prior to Building Construction Permit: Items 1-12 are hereby acknowledged and shall be coordinated prior to Building Construction Permit. GN#1. Acknowledged, all resubmittals shall be accompanied with a response letter addressing how each department condition has been met. GN#2. Acknowledged, DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. Traffic Engineerin� Review Prior to Community Development Board 1. Speed ramp slope provided arch. sheet 1. Prior to Building Permit 1. Acknowledged, please see revised ground floor plan with added signage, relocated crosswalks and revised flow fc increased safety. We will work with Traffic Engineering to locate placement of necessary convex mirrors or otr safety measures as needed. (See Note added to Civil Sheet C3.1 � , General Note(s): 1. Acknowledged, Applicant shall comply with the current Transportation Impact Fee Ordinance and fee schedule and pay prior to a Certificate of Occupancy being issued. 2. Acknowledged, DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. We trust this information is sufficient to respond to the DRC comments and allow the project to move forward to the Community Development Board. Please feel free to contact us if you have questions or require additional information and we will respond immediately. Sincerely, Renee Ruggiero, Senior Project Planner Northside Engineering Services, Inc. Courtyard by Marriott - East Shore NES 1023 — Response to DRC Comment 04.12.2012 RMR/rmr 5 � ,.,.� ,r,.�r�* �:��;�=.�'�"��- �crnic;��.g�- � G�� COURTYARD BY MARRIOTT (PROPOSED� 443 - EasT SxouE D�uvE NA�TIVE Description of Request �ivil Land F'lanning ��A� [�iligence Reports i�e-Zraning, L�ir�rJ Use, Annexation Star�7ivvat�r Managemerit Utility C3esign Ti•affic Construction Adrr�ir�istraCir�n The Applicant, Louis Developments, LLC. proposes to redevelop the site with a 134-unit hotel, including 71 units from the I3each by Design Hotel Density Reserve. The subject property is an aggregate of 1.26 acres and is comprised of several lots bounded by Clearwater Harbor to the east, Papaya Street on the south and by East Shore Drive to the west. The project area also includes a parcel to the west, located across East Shore Drive; this parcel will provide additional parking for the proposed hotel and is bounded by Poinsettia Street to the west and East Shore Drive to the east. Specifically, the Applicant requests flexible development approval to permit 134 overnight accommodation units in the Tourist District, which includes an increase in density of 71 overnight accommodation units from the Beach by Design Hotel Density Reserve, with � a. b. c. d. e. f. g• h. a Lot Area of 1.26 acres (54,929 square feet); a Lot Width of 315 feet on East Shore Drive and 137.72 feet along Papaya Street; a maximum Building Height (above BFE) of 70' to the roof deck and 85'6" to the mid-point of decorative tower; a front (West) setback along East Shore Drive of 0' to the building and decorative sunshade and 13.5' to the compactor enclosure; front (West) setback along Poinsettia Street of 5' to parking lot pavement; a front (South) setback along Papaya Street of 21.1' to the building, 18.2' to decorative louvers, 6.3' to the compactor enclosure and 3' setback to the wood patio; and side (South) setback of 5' to the parking lot pavement; a side (North) interior setback of 19' to the building and a 5' setback to parking lot pavement within remote parking lot; an (East) waterfront setback of 11.4' to the building and 7.8' to decorative louvers and a 8.4' front (East) setback to the parking lot pavement along Poinsettia Street; Providing 201 Parking Spaces; Flexibility to the minimum standards for Sight Visibility Triangles on East Shore Drive ; as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2- 803.0 of the Development Code. Additionally, the Applicant request approval of a Development Agreement which sets forth terms of use associated with the 71 rooms from the Beaclz by Design Hotel llensity Reserve. 300 Sr�uth F�elcher (�,c�ad Clearwater, f=lorida 33765 tecf�i@nnrehsidcei��incerings�*rvic�s.cQrn 727 443 2i3G9 Fa>< 72"I �14(> E303E, Discussion The site is located within the area designated by Beach by Design as the "Marina District." Beach by Design identifies this area as a prime location along Clearwater Harbor, desirable as a destination location. Beach by Design strongly encourages and supports redevelopment of the area to include hotels, restaurants and commercial uses, together with residential and mixed use developments. The district desires development of the waterfront for the enjoyment of residents and tourists, envisioning boater-friendly uses and a public boardwalk along Clearwater Harbor to bolster the areas identity as a destination location. A large portion of the project area is currently vacant with the remaining area containing three single story structures, providing overnight accommodations and attached dwellings/efficiencies uses. The parcels are under the same ownership control and the applicant proposes to demolish all existing structures. Prouosed Use The proposed Courtyard by Marriott hotel will offer reasonable room rates, appropriate for mid-priced family vacations. The design provides a 4 story hotel over 3 levels of parking and a 6,500 square foot accessory restaurant along the Clearwater Harbor adjacent to a new proposed public boardwalk. General Applicabilit_y Criteria 1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. The bulk, coverage and density of the properties within the neighborhood located to the south, west and north are varied. The area is comprised of one and two story motels and efficiencies; a single story office building is located southwest of the project site and two re-developed sites containing attached dwelling units are located further to the north and have building heights of two and three stories above parking. The majority of the surrounding developments provide minimal to no setbacks to pavement and/or buildings, offering little landscaping. Many sites provide parking which requires cars to back into the right of way. The Belle Harbor project is located at the northern terminus of East Share Drive providing varying building heights of 2-12 stories. The proposed mid-sized hotel is in harmony with the scale, bulk and coverage of the surrounding developments as the proposed development provides similar lot coverage and density as the surrounding sites. The proposal offers a building design of appropriate bulk and scale based upon the project area, the character of the surrounding properties and the intent of Beach by Design. 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. The proposed improvements will not discourage appropriate development and use of the adjacent land and buildings, the area is already developed and the value of adjacent and surrounding properties will not be compromised. The development proposal will enhance this area of the Beach in a number of ways, including: 1. A nationally-recognized hotel chain will attract guests who will become patrons of Beach restaurants, shops and tourist attractions, offering support to many local businesses. 2. The property value will significantly increase. 3. Updated architecture and landscape design will significantly enhance this block which currently has very few updated buildings and sites. 4. Mid-priced hotel accommodations on Clearwater Beach with adequate parking will meet a current need of the City. 5. The construction associated with the new hotel will meet current building codes. 6. The incorporation of a public boardwalk will enhance the waterfront and the neighborhood, providing waterfront access to adjacent properties, residents and visitors. 7. The proposed hotel will contribute to the City's economic base and will create jobs. 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use. The proposed development will comply, as required, with all applicable codes including the Florida Building Code, the Life Safety Code and the Florida Fire Prevention Code. The public boardwalk will be lit, providing improved and safe waterfront access. Parking is designed to accommodate hotel guests, employees, the restaurant and the marina. New sidewalk installations and an appropriately buffered trash collection area will further improve current conditions, improving pedestrian flow on the easterly side of East Shore Drive. 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traf�c congestion. The design provides parking which is primarily internal to the building, is screened from Clearwater Harbor and is architecturally integrated into the design of the building. An accessory surface parking lot is provided within the design and is not located along the waterfront. Adequate parking as provided will help to insure smooth traffic flow at the entrance of the garage along East Shore Drive. Traffic impacts as a result of the proposed mid-sized hotel and the accessory restaurant will be minimal; it is anticipated that nearby intersections and adjacent roadways will continue to operate at acceptable levels of service after the proposed improvements are completed. 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. The community character is primarily comprised of one and two story overnight accommodations and efficiency units. The proposed mid-sized hotel is consistent with the surrounding and nearby uses, and the character of the community; the design offers an appropriately scaled development for the vicinity. The proposed Courtyard by Marriott hotel with mid-range pricing will meet the needs of the Community, providing reasonably priced overnight accommodations on the Beach. The proposed development will visually enhance the area. 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts, on adjacent properties. The development proposal will improve the visual appeal of the property as viewed from the street and Clearwater Harbor, offering a Mediterranean architectural design which is appropriate and aesthetically pleasing for this waterfront property. The proposed trash collection area is screened and will not negatively impact the passerby; adequate parking is provided and will minimize congestion. The proposed parking structure is appropriately shielded from the street and waterfront, and the architectural components of the building provide desired buffering and minimize all activities associated with the hotel operation at street level. COMPREHENSIVE INFILL REDEVELOPMENT - PROJECT CRITERIA 1. The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development is otherwise impractical without deviations from the intensity and development standards. The proposed deviations from Code are necessary and the minimum required to allow re-development of the site with a mid-priced hotel utilizing the Hotel Density Reserve. Deviations are necessary to accommodate the restoration of mid-priced hotel rooms as desired and envisioned by Clearwater Ordinance No. 925-08. The proposed hotel complies with the Beach by Design guidelines to the fullest extent possible providing sunshades, louvers and balconies along all facades, and a generous stepback along the western elevation. The architectural design introduces a mixture of colors, textures and details with tropical landscaping provided along street frontages where possible. The building meets the setback requirements along the northern internal side yard providing appropriate buffering for the site to the north. Beach by Design identifies the shallow lot depths found in the area is as a limiting factor associated with redevelopment opportunities. The shallow depth of the site created some challenges in accommodating a mid-sized hotel and is a major contributing factor for the requested flexibility. The Applicant has actively assembled land to better meet the needs of the development and the development proposal meets the City's desire to add mid-priced hotel rooms to Clearwater Beach. Hei�ht Flexible Development Standards for the Tourist District allow flexible height of between 35'-50' with the specific standards for the Marina District within Beach by Design superseding the district regulations. Incentives for preferred uses are provided within the Marina District of Beach by Design and include increased building heights to better realize the District's vision. The proposed height of 70' to the roof deck meets the 80' bonus height guideline prescribed within the Marina District of Beach by Design, the proposed mid-sized hotel is appropriate for the site and surrounding properties. The proposed height is the minimum necessary to achieve the required number of rooms for a viable mid-priced hotel project, the required parking levels to accommodate the hotel and the sites location within a flood zone. Setbacks The Marina District of I3each by Design permits overnight accommodations a zero foot fi•ont setback. The proposed design offers the desired reduced setbacks along the majority of the frontage with the remaining areas providing areas of tropical plantings adjacent to the right-of-way. The area adjacent to Clearwater Harbor will consist of a Public Boardwalk with access to the accessory restaurant and outdoor patio area. A varying setback of 19' to 37.7' is provided within the internal side yard along the north. The proposed design will enhance and promote a pedestrian-friendly environment as desired by the Marina District of I3each by Design. The design of the surface parking lot and proposed setbacks to pavement, result in sufficient and appropriate landscape buffers. The proposed buffers will provide the desired shielding of vehicles and will enhance the streetscape with landscaping that is not currently present along the street frontages. Si�ht Visibilitv Trian�les A request for flexibility with regard to sight visibility triangles on East Shore Drive is requested. The applicant proposes to install safety measures such as signage and pavement markings at garage entrances to improve safety for pedestrians and motorists. This request is largely due to the fact that Beach by Design desires minimal/zero setbacks for buildings to promote pedestrian activity; therefore meeting the visibility triangles as required for a suburban design is not practical for the inore urban designs required for the Beach. 2. The development or redevelopment will be consistent with the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan, as well as with the general purpose, intent and basic planning objectives of this code, and with the intent and purpose of this zoning district. The proposed redevelopment will provide a highly desired use which contributes to the city economy; overnight accommodation uses are allowed in the "Resort Facilities High" land use category and are consistent with the goals of the Comprehensive plan and Beach by Design. Applicable Comprehensive Plan Goals/Policies/Objectives include but are not limited to: A.6.6 Objective - Tourism is a substantial element of the City's economic base and as such the City shall continue to support the maintenance and enhancement of this important economic sector. A.6.7 Objective - Redevelopment activities shall be sensitive to the city's waterfront and promote appropriate public access to the city's waterfront resources. Beach by Design Marine District prefers hotel uses and specially envisioned mid- sized hotels. The availability of updated affordable overnight accommodations is integral to the success of tourism, both locally to Clearwater Beach and the Community as a whole. The proposed access to the waterfront promotes tourism activities and enjoyment of our natural resources. 3. The development or redevelopment will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of surrounding properties. The proposed development is compatible with the neighborhood, as is more particularly discussed in General Applicability Criteria 1 and 2 together with Comprehensive Infill Criteria 4 below, and will not impede other development. The proposed redevelopment project will benefit the community as a whole and specifically this district. The proposed hotel may encourage additional investment and improvement to the surrounding properties. 4. Adjoining properties will not suffer substantial detriment as a result of the proposed development. Adjoining properties will not suffer substantial detriment as a result of this proposal. The proposed overnight accommodation use is a preferred use and is well established within the neighborhood and district. The proposal includes many improvements such as, providing a new updated structure which meets current building codes, FEMA regulations, fire and ADA requirements; the site improvements include provisions for appropriate parking spaces and access which will greatly improve the safety of motorist and pedestrians, residents and visitors alike. Responsible site drainage, appropriate setbacks and tropical landscaping will provide further benefits to the neighborhood and community. 5. The proposed use shall otherwise be permitted by the underlying future land use category, be compatible with adjacent land uses, will not substantially alter the essential use characteristics of the neighborhood; and shall demonstrate compliance with one or more of the following objectives: a. The proposed use is permitted in this zoning district as a minimum standard, flexible standard or flexible development use; b. The proposed use would be a significant economic contributor to the City's economic base by diversifying the local economy or by creating jobs; c. The development proposal accommodates the expansion or redevelopment of an existing economic contributor d. The proposed use provides for the provision of affordable housing e. The proposed use provides for development or redevelopment in an area that is characterized by other similar development and where a land use plan amendment and rezoning would result in spot land use or zoning designation; f. The proposed use provides for the development of a new and/or preservation of a working waterfront use The "Resort Facility High" land use category and the "Tourist" zoning district both permit overnight accommodation uses; the district allows overnight accommodation uses. The proposed mid-priced hotel will be a significant economic contributor to the City, promoting tourism and will generate new jobs for the community. The proposed Public Boardwalk will improve access to the waterfront along the Clearwater Harbor, further promoting pedestrian activity and tourism within the Marina District of Clearwater Beach. 6. Flexibility with regard to use, lot width, required setbacks, height, and off- street parking are justified based on demonstrated compliance with all of the following design objectives: a. The proposed development will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of the surrounding properties for uses permitted in this zoning district; Overnight accommodation uses are permitted in the Tourist (T) zoning district. As the surrounding properties are made up of primarily overnight accommodations, the proposed mid-sized hotel will not impede normal and orderly development and improvements of the surrounding properties as previously discussed within General Applicability Criteria 2. This re- development proposal may stimulate additional redevelopment and improvements to the area. b. The proposed development complies with applicable design guidelines adopted by the City; Through appropriate site and architectural design the proposed development complies with the design guidelines within Beach by Design and the Marina District by: • Providing an architectural design which offers breaks in the fa�ades with sunshades, louvers, windows and a generous stepback along the west elevation. Further providing varying roof lines and a Mediterranean design with a mixture of color, texture and details. • Offering tropical plantings in all available areas to improve the pedestrian environment, utilizing drought tolerant multi-level plantings which will thrive within the Clearwater Beach environment. • Proposing a hotel use which is a preferred use and providing public access to the waterfront through the incorporation of a public boardwalk and accessory waterfront into the plan, the waterfront development meets the goals and objectives of Beach by Design. c. The design, scale, and intensity of the proposed development supports the established or emerging character of an area; The emerging character of area is varying and transitional as newer and older developments exist, the area primarily offers overnight accommodation and efficiency uses. In order to promote mid-priced hotels, it is reasonably expected there will be mixed neighborhoods comprised of older, smaller motels and businesses adjacent to newer mid- sized, mid-priced hotels. Please see additional discussion under General Applicability Criteria 1. d. In order to form a cohesive, visually interesting and attractive appearance, the proposed development incorporates a substantial number of the following design elements: • Changes in horizontal building planes • Use of architectural details such as columns, cornices, stringcourses, pilasters, porticos, balconies, railings, awnings, etc. • Variety of materials and colors • Distinctive fenestration patterns • Building stepbacks; and • Distinctive roof forms The above elements are incorporated into the architectural design as shown on the building elevation. The design provides changes in the horizontal plane through locations of balconies, windows and architectural details. A significant building step-back is offered along East Shore Drive beginning on the fourth floor, the strategic location of the pool and pool deck creates this large change in the building plane and mass as prescribed by Beach by Design. The architectural design offers a variety of materials, colors, and textures, tile covered, distinctive and varying roof forms are also provided to compliment the Mediterranean design of the building. e. The proposed development provides for appropriate buffers, enhances landscape design and appropriate distances between buildings. The proposed buffers and setbacks provide appropriate buffers and distances between buildings and an inviting tropical appearance along the street. The design provides for substantial landscape buffering along the northern property line, offering enhanced screening for the adjacent property to the north. The proposed development provides appropriate buffers within the concept of Beach by Design and zero setbacks, providing appropriate buffers and distances between buildings and adjacent properties. The current site includes little to no landscaping, the proposed landscape design will greatly enhance the site and the area. The Applicant has simultaneously submitted a comprehensive landscape application with this application to address any necessary landscape reductions associated with the proposed site and landscape plan. Beach bv Desi�n The proposed 134-unit hotel, including 71 units from the Beach by Design Hotel Density Reserve is below the density allowed by Beach by Design offering 134 units per acre where 150 units per acre is permitted. The proposed height of four stories over three levels of parking meets the height bonus permitted within the Marina District of Beach by Design for developments providing a public boardwalk with the strategic location of the pool and pool deck creating the desired change in the building floor plate, plane and mass as prescribed by Beach by Design. The design is respectful of the architectural vocabulary within Beach by Design and the community character; the building is in scale to its height and length and offers the desired elements of step-backs, balconies, changes in plane, massing and floor plates. The west elevation provides a substantial change in setback with an inset of over 13' near the south end of the building, step-backs are also provided at both stair towers with openings for the garage and a clearly defined pedestrian entrance; a large stepback in the building takes place above the 3rd floor garage level to allow for the pool deck, creating a nice inset to the building providing additional breaks in the western plane. The east elevation, adjacent to Clearwater Harbor provides a highly desired public boardwalk with changes in elevation being accomplished through balconies, decorative louvers and a building bump-out. The proposed development is compatible with the neighborhood, as is more particularly �� discussed in General Applicability Criteria 1 and 2 together with Comprehensive Infill Criteria 4 above. The Site Design Criteria section of the Marina District of Beach by Design provides zero setbacks for overnight accommodation uses with a requirement to maintain east-west view corridors. Along the northern property line a 19' — 37'+ setback is provided to meet the east- west view corridor criteria. The required 5' setback to pavement is provided in association with the surface parking lot with an 8' setback or more being provided along the street frontages providing the required buffering. New sidewalks have been provided along all street frontages to the fullest extent possible given the existing dimensions of the right of way and curb locations. New 10' wide sidewalks are provided along the west and east sides of East Shore Drive, along the east side of East Shore Drive and along Papaya Street. A new 5' sidewalk is provided along Poinsettia Street adjacent to the project areas. All public sidewalks have been increased to the fullest extent possible given the dimensional restraints of the right of way and providing the desired reduced building setbacks and landscaping. To create an inviting, human scale at the street level and to ensure that the street level is pedestrian friendly the following items are provided within the design: • Architectural details and elements are provided at street level • Sidewalks have been increased to the fullest extent possible with tropical landscaping provided to soften the area between the building and pedestrians pathway • Sunshades and louvers offer shade and scale for pedestrians • Pedestrian Entrances are clearly defined with decorative, lighted bollards and a large sunshade. • The function of the parking garage is not readily apparent, as desired by the Design Guidelines. • Lush tropical landscaping is provided along the surface parking lot and along the sides and front of the hotel structure. • The hotel site design incorporates a public boardwalk along the waterfront, • A previously approved marina is a part of the development • Outdoor restaurant seating is offered along the Papaya Street frontage All of the items above meet the desires and intent of Beach by Design and promote pedestrian activity and tourism within the Marina District of Clearwater Beach. Please see Architectural Plans for additional illustrative evidence of compliance with the Design Guidelines contained within Beach by Design. Courtyard by Marriott — East Shore Hotel revised 04.13.2012 by Renee Ruggiero/rmr � LL � C earwater U Planning Department 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, Florida 33756 Telephone: 727-562-4567 Fax: 727-562-4865 ❑ SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION ❑ SUBMIT 14 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION - Plans and application are required to be collated, stapled and folded into sets CASE NUMBER: RECEIVED BY (Staff initials): DATE RECEIVED: * NOTE: A TOTAL OF 15 SETS OF THIS APPLICATION AND ALL SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION IS REQUIRED TO BE SUBMITTED IN CONJUNCTION WITH A COMPLETE LEVEL ONE OR LEVEL TWO APPLICATION. COMPREHENSI'VE LANDSCAPE PRO�RAM (Revised 04/24/2007) �PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT� APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A) APPLICANT NAME: MAILING ADDRESS PHONENUMBER: CELL NUMBER: PROPERTY OWNER(S) List ALL owners on the deed Louis Developments LLC _--- --------------- _ ___._ ._----- .. ----- - __ _ _ 630 South Gulfview Bivd. 727-443-2869 --�--- LL -__ __ __ Louis Developments LLC Clearwater, FL 33767-2642 FAx NuMaER: 727-446-8036 __....---------- ._........--_.___._ EMAIL: housh@northsideengineering.net a,�Er,r r,aME: Northside Engineering_Services, Inc. __---_ ---..---- .. _.._ . __.__...�._---- ---___ ------ . __--------- ------- MAILING ADDRESS: 3OO S. B2ICI1@r RO�CI, Clearwater, FL 33765 __ . _---..__ _ __.__ _._----- ___.___ __. __..---.. . _---_._.. .. ---.._._ .. ._.__...._ __..__.....------._. _.___ PHONE NuMBER: 727-443-2869 F,vc r,unnBER. 727 446 8036 -- _ _. _ - _ __---- - _ . _ _ . __ ---_. -- — -. ___ _ _ . _ _._ ____. CELL NUMBER: 727-235-H4%rJ EMAIL: renee�nOI�I1SICIE@C1gIIlE.'E,'fillg_tl@t 1. ARCHITECTURAL THEME: a. The landscaping in a Comprehensive Landscape Program shall be designed as a part of the architecturat theme of the principal buildings proposed or developed on the parcel proposed for the development. The landscape design provides a tropical theme as appropriate for the Clearwater Beach community; presenting rich layers of color and texture with vertical enhancement of architectural features. The landscape has been planned with regard to drainage patterns, underground and overhead utilities, structure verticality and to reduce pedestrian and vehicular conflicts. oR ++AND++ Page 1 of 2 b. The design, character, location and/or materials of the landscape treatment proposed in the Comprehensive Landscape Program shall be demonstrably more attractive than landscaping otherwise permitted on the parcel proposed for deve�opment under the minimum landscape standards. Over 1,500 new plants will be inst�lled, consisting of 18 different varieties and over 100 new trees consisting of 7 different varieties; the plantings will appear mature at time of installation. Virtually all available open space has received treatment providing a design that exceeds the minimum standards. 2. COMMUNITY CHARACTER: The landscape treatment proposed in the Comprehensive Landscape Program will enhance the community character of the City of Clearwater. The lush and full landscape design will enhance the community character, presenting 4 layers of color, texture and. height. The propo �ed upgrades will be enjoyed by the community and visitor5 for manv vears. 3. PROPERTY VALUES: The landscape treatment proposed in the Comprehensive Landscape Program will have a beneficiai impact on the value of the property in the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. The landscape treatment will provide beneficial impact and value by providing aesthetically pleasing views while providing climate control for buildings. In addition, utilizing native and introduced plant material species, which are conducive to the Clearwater Beach environment will reduce unnecessarv irriqation de►nand on limited water resources. 4. SPECIAL AREA OR SCENIC CORRIDOR PLAN: The landscape treatment proposed in the Comprehensive Landscape Program is consistent with any special area or scenic corridor plan which the City of Clearwater has prepared and adopted for the area in which the parcel proposed for development is located. The landscape was enhanced to exceed the requirements of Beach by Design. Plants proposed include species which thrive within the beach area of the proposed hotel. Layering of plantings to enhance ,vertical elements of the structures have been proposed including groundcovers, shrubs, understory trees and palms as well as taller palms reaching higher facades. THE LANDSCAPING REQUIREMENTS OF ARTICLE 3, DIVISION 12 MAY BE WAIVED OR MODIFIED AS A PART OF A LEVEL ONE OR LEVEL TWO APPLICATION, AS THE CASE MAY BE, IF THE APPLICATION FOR DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL INCLUDES A COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM, WHICH SATISFIES THE ABOVE CRITERIA. THE USE OF LANDSCAPE PLANS, SECTIONS / ELEVATIONS, RENDERINGS AND PERSPECTIVES MAY BE NECESSARY TO SUPPLEMENT THE INFORMATION PROVIDED ON THIS WORKSHEET. SIGNATURE: I, the undersigned, acknowledge that all representations made in this application are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge and authorize City representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application. — --______------------- ----- ignature of property owner or representative STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLSS Sworn to and subscribed before me this %�s day of , A.D. 20� to me and/or by , who is personally known has produced as identification. � ` "�"'.— Notary public, My commission expires: %�� '�,� �� ( � �p'�PR; ;�eli� HAM A. GOEL � * MY COMMISSION # DD 949832 EXPIRES: May 3, 2014 Page 2 of 2 �r�TFOFF��\OP BondedThruBudgetNolaryServices 05/2i/2011 08:27 7275624961 Q�1TE RESIQUAL F�ow r�� u7 � PS1 / �� PSI � �r �� PUBLIC UTILITIES FLCJVI/ T��T CITY O�F C�.LAf�WATER WATER DEPq�TM�NT . �� rr �� , Y'` � �- � 1�br�� r� / 1 !� ��r l'!�J �I (��""�Vi'�i�� hC�. ��'Y'. a�stiNa -rES-r PAGE 02 Z:\�1 Autof7lD RoJeqe1dl96 Eseishore ONVe\NEW PRO7ECTl09)4SUrveY109-0131.dw9, 4f1R011 L•32:fOPM \` .�`' 1 � r � �I� zn �I i� m r� � � � ! ; i �n _ _. _ I i� , , � � � � �� 00�3 � nnp= N y�3 � -_ zl ��m m� rnm� _� _ '; � Z n - ----� �°'o —_---�_'. r m N � - -----_ _ _ i�o _� p � w 0 _— �� (� ' .lSPB.�LTPAtBAfgj�rr _ p �y --�.__ _ _ � I j,� I�} c� T I:�1 T� -.�A H p —�— O _ 9 I J -! � �� - i � '� ��— n ��D __�-- �� E � � - � ' --� � 60'RIGHT-OF-RTAY �_� �� -- _ .p__.�_ �� - if` --- 1?� IRON ---. I r �-_ WATER �N -N� - - - - - - � "•' a� p -_'-�",- � -_,-��—_ _ - W - - - - - - - - ---Q� � �, �s o �- ° "� Oe�`' i'_ _ _ �.=VAId'EYCf1R8 ,a. c� � --__.___� _ IS0.0' — �a I� - •.A�w-----�_-----w-- �' �a ,� � A il'� 149.80' (� ' -- . � j�j p6°29� ,► �� a - -,� - - - w- - - - - - - - - '°'°' �„ ----- '' °�� °' � �. __ __ � 100.0' "= �,�� ,� � ' ' ' ' ' ' _ '� O � p ,� �.--- �)10 ,p� � r M �� o T- -_.p --p (1� � � o 0 � I �£6'b `ro PLANTER �`---"�--, ___ � � �"~' �� ~ � r del0.8b'03�i133 p 28.08' �p -.� �i M �fr -�, � � �, N ,� °'� I � _ • ri.n►�r�R . �" � ��,5 �',� s D �I i///��jj�� p z O �j I 9 � 9 i8.�� / ��p � ��.1 i � I ��.jll�o� 2 � 7�' � z �_ ��a, I 1 a/ t� o hf O ��0 Q� I� G , I Z r r r� ! � o o r C % � �� D O y �°�� "' � I � � � s.aa�� 4SO.SZ'�� `"� � , �, � � C;�� , �+►.. n ��e ❑N � � _��! "d '�! �--'� � y � bd Cd o � - 8 � i g ,tir � _ .'�' . �'u � ��, r x°u� i" � r I `°�� I Y 4 I N �� I �O� � � `Y � G O V ( � Q � � �r� O `�I; (_�j � ; o �� p rr �uz ; ,� � z � �t1i uz � � �z O O �' � � � n I I I, � � � � � � � �� ' �? A�'] o; a H m � � Z v� � N y °z �'s ' � i � '''" ►�+ 71 � r r' y I a [LI ' 7 ❑ C1 'a � r -, i 7 's � r � r E s i rn � � � N 330 �40'0'�NO� � � _, -a ° � � � I p r r r' � �'� � � _) � I ' I I 3.51' r - f �a' � � I O�, � � � � o-(�i � � — �'�"� ty � i • �1 ' z � � � c ao ao ao -� tn - 0 � � r' � a Q i� , r :: :O D �3.53' In � m f � � N 11 O� ��s's 'r,�'� A y y � -- ; � n c� n� z�,ao zi •o •�xo� I - m �.► m T� ' ��03 �,�, r°� � I° � O ��~� �`�O 1.] �?i l`1i � � � � "� S Z 0z � ? l� ' I z � .ES'E fJ� Z �, G � �' i� T � �� 3 '71 �`[�] "'C �sm � z s n c,m � • �'~'n � 71 g pz � � k � I � m m m m �" � m � � ►�JI -!' �xf �7 � , � _ mtOZr �`�� I I QO IIIaH --,"�_� ��, "`?� � s �� „�� ! I a I � i A �� I� � � � ; r=r+" °'. tl II II � U1 � A - ' I � p � . j° i i ��-� GAS -- Ga.' �_ GA5 -�� '__�.._. .---..--�__--� �j ~ O w V p n I � I I $ � � '�,+� i i v �' �- GA� � __ _ ' _ _ ; �,�, � `' ` -_- �;,; : _ Z„ -- ---- _ _ _ __ v v 3ao �59'07JI�d� I o � � � � I c� G 00 OD OD UI "' - _ i-�- _ � r '��N - � - �_ Gn; ._ ---- -- -�-y---=�•� � __ .£I'SZ __ .� z � e e a D ,dr� � .` � y � � - i �A -. �-� - ,A' � - O PLANI'ER � �e � ,y n i — . n n n z �*� u+ Q__-- -----I - r,q- � _ yq ,� -_= a tr r �ZO'S zS i � � � = i �� -"'�---� .. _ ro ;T �_ !,v-. ----- G.1' n _ 'N -- �4`_�- � ` k:08i 9 oe r m ]0.10' � `- �� - �=�- p,n. � r � N �-�i r�i � � r i ?; :. -_ r 'd�� - ------ - -. - -' _-- . � j =-- - 'D V � 3 '4 � a� _�--�_ ` ui�--_ � _ _ - - �- - • IJ �.:7D - � �3RE � : 1 I_ {y Y 1. y r � C7 � a. EDGE OF pqyE�.f ->--- ' _ _ _ __— m � � Z r � A� ' ---_-. -__ � � ",�_�___.__ --- `- � -� �� -------- ---- - - -=i-. °' �1�.Q `�O° , �a,� � Ux �,�: ��` m m � '�' _ �' - -- - - _'- - p -�- rr r �� . Lu P � __"_- _- s � - ' - ' - �-- ; r �— � 11 II • �+ N b ` °+ � "a` - - ---•-- � � � �----- � � g� _ y' �;�5`/ � 'd� � � __� --� � •��, `� ,� ---_'a_ _ -y- - - - _ - _ _ 7..ri�;` � „�__ - - II ^ o� .P p � -�' �' ' - � �� O �i i � O "i 'C � - - - W- _ _Q _ `?� --�- �s � -- -- . - c `9.0 ^ '�SPH�lLTPA _ 1 � � � _ _ -�_ � v 'Q�j � O O � 3 I �.. i � m ae � - - - - - W- - - c�' - - - - _ � �ED_ QE_OF PqyEMENT � � W -� -� � � T r- v� � �--�___�'�° ' Q Oo O� Z Z w �i �:�Q'� �, - �i� . - - 8" IRON s - -- -- � D A `� � �'�.�.._' I r' '�eo � � � � v V � � y 3 �: � .x ''� � � '` W/ATER MAIN - aM- . - - - -. - - � �_'- G � .a �^'� ( ,� �� _ I P� � + �—; , � `�� ED(iE OF PAV�r � _�-- - __,�_ m rn . �•a, _ p . - W - _ ��/ � - - - - - p �`�, i '0,r60� Z� ��•- _�; ` _ PNrr S 2 'U � � �� 1,, L - - -�K _ _ .OS . m C .� ` Vill -OF_W,4Y' — L r � ��, ``! � m - .a�_ rn � n '�' '' � � - - _' ,'� --j --- ��`�" 1�T 06°,2}� rr - - av_ _ _ - - - .. - - w- : _ { b � o� .,� "p . �� _, , x � � � -�- -_ r irn- `W i �� uC ° � � '----__�' ��_---- 00 E 31 �� - _ _ _ N�'y 1` � i� . � . •,, .� � �----- _. 5. p� a � n w ' � n ~ I � -a� '` °� � �� i�i'1,•�" �, - - - - - - - --_ ' p� _ � ----- n � 2 � � - -- __ - • . r a .� . '� � , � � � v � ,�� _____�!�� .�,� } �" _ _ _ ,� � N N � I i n � P I � I ��_ -�j� � �� I �p� _{�-�---�__�r- s�FDGB 0F PAVF.AgaT1' O N O y � ., �'n K Iv � , - - � ' =� r 9k.�' 0 ? v N „d � ( � +� W � PLAN7ER : /. p '_ p � a� . �A '- d- yy_ _ _ _ � > `i � M�+ � n . GID � � I � � 20.31' ... ' � � �t � `— � ; � � ?�T1 �� - �1wp i �� V1 � OD � � � � P1•ANTER � - � J W "''.(I� '� I � I ! Z � .ti p s� -�93� _ u� . • �..a'+:'Ip ' 71 " ' r , . �r�-_.--�---- ,, n,� .. I I I � i�` � r� � ZZ.� o, , ,� �� pWO;' � •,v 1� ,c�,�� o . 4 1.` , rn '� I� � I ��i J� CE�4'OFF � � �a !�-i-_.�-- ------ ------ � '' � c�:�, .'' � .� � � `" I I ` � _ � 1�.' I� o � '� - —' --� 300. (p� x� , I r-3 �� ' �.. � � _ -- ,�- ��= , ,a; n � � � i � '� _ ''p 300.16' (� e � � • Oi O ,F_ r,�e�. - n:,- � � � „ ? i �, � - �, (� . �i0 � +:�� I .v�+ �� N q y ti � �' � A �� N � � � � c, p'� � N g � V � _� 01 z .(zi �' f'�i � � � � � _ �,�o .� � - , � � i V rn � � Cr1 �'�' t� �, � _ z p y i o r� � m '' � •�s `�„�-r-r, � ao � � z° i.+ �'\ � v� a� a `'t' �� - I � � � O 2.4a: - � I~ � �u W� � y xl0 �� C�' �� I I I �� ' � I � � '�y r� �� p ��I �,., �� _� -1 _� N, rn � -- - -- � ro a Oz �,� �1 r '� y � � / � � �'�� y O p - � , a+ 0 8►�' tr] � N� 11 � � � r" � - i I '� r � � I,; �� ,c � •p � �."% , � �i ZT7 ,.y.� e• ` n (/� A � P`r I� I�.I � r� v `, i � l..i � C?� � � �y W �'p� � ;' � r O pp A z � � . � �� , t � � �\,�' C �, t a._ �.. a '° '1 , y A , I vi �i/� �,� (n c T T �l�-� �- � O �n � :� p � "d p . : . 9�� ' ,.r�e �'� �G 7d � p . o `° `�� . 00., � R1 � ' b b � � ' _' � I c�'� a o'r O `" e � < �,p �.. � � ' � � � b �] � '< �' E � 6' ;;.. ,p .� �. _ n �j � �d a+ y \ O �� N ..p � �O �� ?� a' � p � �+ ( I t-, -' � O 'C n I � O t�'i rr � O W �i`'� � � � �"� r ►�i � � N ",U ,� '� � o °a T � cov. coxc. �D -- x °z �, � ,Np � ' � � � � Z Q � � � �O -O I I I — �� :;� a� �� n � � �� a r 31.ba p '� � S � _%'% = x� "� C" y. • s� , V t� y � I � p . a � .� •�,r � ,I, "' m c , � C� � A . , '�, ( r� $.�. u. o a ,� �� S Q� Oz •'o �� - �/� � ' 1 � �u�L; �s � � ? �I � °d '`,'�,.IV; m � '�d' �d ,r ,� , .,f �`. = � ��: .;/:��: L � L:� � � � g !� � �C z �' �o.ao� n. �" ` � � � �-+ p o JJ,� _;�� ;�y:' '71 r r � � ' � d y� w Ihd I� yj�IF;� �''.�„ z r' � t.� �, W r� "� "d �`� % L I � �� .�� I \� I t� � --� � I ?O p \ $ �� o � 24.45 Ed Cp -�- �? ' �`+ ' .. j�c ' � 4fls' r - Q •fd. '�Y I �' - J IA /; p� � w' m- � z l �s . , �; '';._. � I � I � ,�� ', . I II _. `- I . � r ,69'SZ i . ° ',,, y N � U \ �' a x'' �-+ - � - _ _ 0 �, � � . � °, '°r� �+� ��, G� �G� V - _ `� �" � ro -'. e �s •� , - - _ �_ � � � � aS V � � � r� r � e� m !.a ' � - ' ;'� r 45.43' -�-�..' �. O I�a ro s � �'? � � � � - 06�29��0"t7T 1 I- � n ��_ z o s�, � � �' V r O � n � �9 0� . �� _�— W 3 5. �� (PLAT I,I1VE — _ _ I � � _ - � C - � � �I �.�r.. ;� - .Z9 0> _ 3.79' r � `_ � � v �� i FENCE 0.15' OFF II i„ 'r ` - � ( • ` RoDI�A � �, � .a A � m.. � .� _1 .� rn r � ��, � �w ,�� b� o -� - - ��=_ _ a �.� �� o � E � � N -_ , _ . �' -- - s �-� ,� x �s�+ . � � � a t:, r" •�r9 � c ci �, $�?- -- l i•� 'C �y '} •tp I � Iv� : -- ? ' � -_ _ �, � o��. •�, � s. •s '.� � � � z ' J -�-- m ,.00 $ � a o� .� - -_ ABBREYtATIONS S.N &D = 5ET NAIL AND DISC #16539 FD. PK. N. = FOUND PK NAIL S.I.R = SET IRUN ROD #6539 F.C.M. = FOUND CONC. MON. �p� - p�,AT S.Cd.R. = SET CAPPED IRON ROD FD. N.&D. = FOUND NAIL AND DISC. �_�I,p S.C.M. = SET CONCRETE MONUMENT B.M. = BENCH MARK �-�i �j�i D F.I.R. = FAUND IRON ROD L.FL.EL. = LOWEST FLOOR ELEV. (C) = CALCULATED F.O.P. = FOUND OPEN PIPE GAR. FL.EL. = GARAGE FLOOR ELEV. (D) = DEEDED F.P.P. = FOUND PINCH PIPE C.L.F. = CHAIN LIlVK FENCE �,) = J,�G,�, FH = FIRE HYDRANT TOB = TOP OF BANK LP = LIGHT POLE PP = POWER POLE CONC. = CONCRETE pLA, = PLANTER PREPARED WITHOUT BENEFIT OF TITLE COMIVIITMENT POLICY Ig �I 1 L � � N ;, � � � � ,� �` , �,� � I 1+,�/ � b � � o o� � � � �„ � l o � 8 �yz � � �, � ,_� Eo � �� _ I � � � r- � � — I � FLOOD ZONE: "AE" (B.F.E: 11'), ACCORDING TO F.I.RM. #12103C0102-G, 'I'ypE OF SURVEY: LAND OR BOUNDARY USE: UPDA7'E COMMUI�TITY # 125096, DATED: 9-3-fl3 -------- — NO UNIDERGROUND INSTALLATIONS OR IlVIPROVEMENTS HA�E BEEN LOCATED EXCEPT AS NOTED BASIS OF FIELD BEARINGS: �D�SS: NO INSTRITMENTS OF RECORD REFLECTING EASEMENTS, RIGHT OF WAY, AND/OR OWNERSHIP EASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE, 462 & 463 EAST SHORE DRIVE WERE FURIVISHED TO THIS SURVEYOR EXCEPT AS NOTED AND/OR SHOWN. EAST SHORE DRIVE, AND VACANT LOT, BEING: N.06°29'00"E. CLEARWATER, FLORIDA LEGAL DESCRIPITON: LOTS 8-12, BLOCK C W1TH RIPARiAN RIGHT3, TOGETHER WTI'H LOT310 & 11, BLOCK B, A CERTIFY TO: LOUIS DEVELOPMENTS, LLC RE-PLAT OF BLOCK "A" AND LOTS 1 TO 15 INCL. SLOCK B OF CLEARWATER BEACH PARK FIItST ADDTTION, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 21, PAGE(S) 21, PUSLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA � :-� �-� �n � - � - - -_- �� - n r,, �� SIGNA�TIJRE: llATE: DItAW N BY: �., .: � � �- :,.! ;; ' , . �'. :. �. ; .: � . \ � . � ,, •� n, �. ,� , �, �._ _ . � � � ! , ,. ,. ,,,° � TR�E LEGEIVD ILt�`: �� F PALM (SIZE) 12" I -"� UN�CNOVIIN (SIZE) 1 �� iL:.� ��s �i T .� OAK (SIZE) Y2„ I�=,,�`,.' ``I i �— BAdVYAN (SIZE) IZ" �111' : ;��`;,� EV�RGREEIV (SI,ZE) -- ------- LAUREI� It. PENNY 1Z.L.S.#4931 4-10-2009 LP/JMF fVOTE: LOCATION OF ALL UNDERGROUND UTILITIES IS BASED UPON SURFACE FEATURES AND/OR SCALED FROM UTILITIES MAPS OBTAINED FROM THE CITY OF CLEARWATER AND ARE APPROXIMATE. BASIS OF E�EVATIONS: BLUE N. & D. AT NE CORNER, INTERSECTION OF PAPAYA STREET & EAST SHORE DRIVE, ELEV. = 3.68 (NAVD 88 DATUM) BASIS OF BENCHMARK: PINE�IAS COUIVTY DISC, "NARROW D", MAP # 178 ELEV. = 6.58 (NAVD �'3 DATUM) �� s o�-0131 1 L,-- NOT VALID UNLESS SIGNED & SEAI.EA L.R PENNY AND ASSOC�ATES, INCe 10730102ND AVENUE NOR'T�I SEMINOLE, FLO1tIDr� 3377� PHOl�: (727) 398-4360 FAX: (72'n 319-6051 LICENSED �iTSINE5� # 6539 I � ' � ' � , � �. �; �� .4� TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY FOR EAST SHORE HOTEL SITE (PROPOSED MARRIOT COURTYARD) 443 EAST SHORE DRIVE CLEARWATER BEACH, FLORIDA PREPARED FOR: LOUIS DEVELOPMENT, LLC �: ':' � : GULF COAST CONSULTING,INC. SEPTEMBER 2011 PROJECT # 11-023 � � Robert Perg iz ; AICP, PTP AICP #9023, PTP #133 t yr I. INTRODUCTION The 1.26 acre project site is located at 443 East Shore Drive and currently contains a small motels and associated parking. The site is proposed to be redeveloped as a 134 room hotel with an adjacent 32 slip commercial maxina. The site is located on the east side of East Shore Drive between Papaya Street and Baymont Street on Clearwater Beach (See Figure 1). The redevelopment of the property is the subject of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment in the Tourist "T" zoning district. This application requires an assessment of the traffic impacts of development. Prior to completing this analysis a methodology was established with the City of Clearwater staff. II. EXISTING TRAFFIC CONDITIONS The property has frontage on East Shore Drive and has access to its small parking area on the west side of East Shore Drive. East Shore Drive is a two-lane local roadway. Mandalay Avenue is a four-lane divided collector roadway between the roundabout and Baymont Street. Coronado Drive is four lanes between the roundabout and S. Gulfview Boulevard, and Causeway Boulevard is a four-lane divided arterial roadway. As agreed to by Clearwater staff, traffic counts that were conducted for a proposed Hooters restaurant were used for existing traffic conditions. These counts were conducted between 11 AM - 2 PM and 4- 6 PM on Friday May 20, 2011 at the following intersections: Causeway Boulevard / East Shore Drive Mandalay Avenue / Baymont Street Coronado Drive / S. Gulfview Boulevard All traffic counts were converted to annual average equivalents using FDOT seasonal adjustment factors. Existing traffic volumes are shown in Figure 2. Existing intersections were analyzed using the HCS+ software. The HCS+ printouts are included in Appendix A. At the intersection of Causeway Boulevard / East Shore Drive the primary movements are eastbound-westbound, whereas the southbound approach (East Shore Drive) is stop controlled. The HCS+ analysis shows the southbound stop- controlled movements operate at LOS B during both the midday peak hour and the PM peak hour. Presently the signalized intersection at Mandalay Avenue / Baymont Street operates at LOS A with average delay of 7.4 seconds per vehicle during the midday peak hour, and LOS A with average delay of 7.5 seconds per vehicle during the PM peak hour. 1 -R r � � �ti M ti 0 N � � a � 0 U � � y _ v 0 L � � w � � w z a Y �- R rn M � d N N � M � n .- M M �-1 1 L�.� 12(7� 3�8� � 49(41) � N � �.�.. � � (119)108 �(5)12 � (19)30 `�1 f I~ ^o� �� N M � � M ^ � p�N v� M SAN MARCO ST j W � PAPAYA ST '� � ¢�' � z4 � ¢� � � O a BAYMONT ST � M �v � (117)130 (870) �(753)748 878 CAUSEWAY (a�o) (a�o) BLVD `6k,�1� � 17 O6 1106 6� � `ae�� MARINA �o �n Q " � O N N1 � m � � °' z �� J � � � D p (XX) = MID-DAY PEAK HOUR � ti XX = PM PEAK HOUR � 285(246)� � � ��' 10(26) � � � o '� J � `„ M ti � N y � 0 � `� M "� � C� •� � "' � � EXISTING PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUME (2011) Gulf Coast Consulting, Inc. DATE: Land Development Consulting 6�201 1 DRAWN BY: MKC Q � O � ti � W N PROJECT NO: 11-023 FIGURE: � i Presently the signalized intersection at Coronado Drive / S. Gulfview Boulevard Street operates at LOS A with average delay of 9.5 seconds per vehicle during the midday peak hour, and LOS A with average delay of 9.7 seconds per vehicle during the PM peak hour. Causeway Boulevard is a four-lane divided arterial roadway and according to FDOT 2009 QLOS Handbook capacity tables has a LOS D capacity of 3,560 vehicles per hour. The segment of Mandalay Avenue is a four-lane divided collector roadway with a LOS D capacity of 2,900 vehicles per hour, and Coronado Drive between the roundabout and S. Gulfview is a four-lane divided collector roadway with a LOS D capacity of 2,900 vehicles per hour, and Coronado Drive south of S. Gulfview is three lanes with a capacity of 1,550 vehicles per hour. East Shore Drive is a two-lane local roadway providing direct access to several motels and businesses, it has a peak hour capacity of 960 vehicles per hour. EXISTING ROADWAY CONDITIONS - 2011 Roadwav Se�;ment Midday peak Midda,�S PM peak PM LOS Causeway Blvd 1740 vph LOS B 1984 vph LOS B Mandalay Ave. 813 vph LOS C 910 vph LOS C Coronado Dr. 1325 vph LOS C 1480 vph LOS C Coronado Dr (S. of Gulfview) 757 vph LOS C 929 vph LOS C East Shore Dr (Cewy-Baymont) 140 vph LOS C 171 vph LOS C As shown above all roadway segments and intersections operate at LOS C or better during both the midday and PM peak hours. III. FUTURE TRAFFIC CONDITIONS Existing traffic was adjusted by a 4% annual growth rate to the expected build-out year of 2012 to account for background traffic from other nearby redevelopment projects. In addition traffic estimates for the proposed Hooters/Starbuck proposed for 385 Mandalay Avenue was included in background traffic. The site will be developed as a 134 room hotel with a 32 slip marina, replacing existing development. Using Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation, 8�' Edition rates, the amount of new trips was calculated and estimates axe shown below: TRIP GENERATION ESTIMATES Land Use ITE LUC Amount Dailv Mid-Dav PM Peak Resort Hotel 330 134 rooms 1095 79 (39/40) 66 (28/38) Marina 420 32 slips 95 7 4/3 6 4/2 TOTAL 1190 86 (43/43) 72 (32/40) 2 r _� The expected distribution of vehicular trips is as follows: 30% to / from the south 70% to / from the east PROJECT IMPACT CALCULATIONS (MIDDAY PEAK HOUR) Proj ect Road Segment Lanes Project Trips Capacitv Percent Causeway Blvd. (Roundabout- Island way) 4LD 60 3560 1.69% Mandalay Ave. (Roundabout — Baymont) 4LD 0 2900 0.00% Coronado Drive (Roundabout — Gulfview) 4LD 26 2900 0.90% Coronado Drive (Hamden. — Gulfview) 2LD 26 1550 1.67% East Shore Drive (Site — Causeway) 2LU 86 960 8.96% Background traffic and project traffic vehicular traffic were added to determine total traffic for 2012 and the intersections and roadway segments were reanalyzed. The future traffic volumes are shown in Figure 3, and the HCS+ printouts are included in Appendix B. At the intersection of Causeway Boulevard / East Shore Drive the HCS+ analysis shows the southbound stop-controlled movements would continue to operate at LOS B during both the midday peak hour and the PM peak hour. Under future conditions the signalized intersection at Mandalay Avenue / Baymont Street would operate at LOS A with average delay of 7.4 seconds per vehicle during the midday peak hour, and LOS A with average delay of 7.5 seconds per vehicle during the PM peak hour. Under future conditions the signalized intersection at Coronado Drive / S. Gulfview Boulevard Street would operate at LOS A with average delay of 9.5 seconds per vehicle during the midday peak hour, and LOS A with average delay of 9.8 seconds per vehicle during the PM peak hour. The project will be served by two driveways, the southerly driveway (Drive A) an entrance only and the northerly driveway (Drive B) for exiting traffic. Overflow parking will be provided on the west side of East Shore Drive. At the East Shore Drive / Drive B intersection, all movements would operate at LOS A in both the mid-day and PM peak hours. 3 r _ N N � � � � � a M M � � 1 � 12(7�� 3�g� � 51(44) � �I� �I� � SANMAR-- C— p ST � (124)112 , �(5)12 � (20)31 BAYMONTST �f r O1 N � v �o f- � M � V� M �� SITE 86 MID-DAY PEAK (43/43) 72 PM PEAK (32/40) N � � (43)40 �� PAPAYA ST y� r� � � h � W � O � DRIVE B (EXIT) r. I � W N h M DRIVE A (ENTER) Qrr N � W N � O M M � ��M ��¢ �l� � W �� o� � - �� t— (isz)i s� (sa�) �(as5)sos 966 CAUSEWAY (980) (980) _ BLVD 1 1 �� 1202 202 � 1 ^,�� 6$� � L� o,o� MARINA �a Q °0 � O N M �N N vv z 0 � v� � j p (XX) = MID-DAY PEAK HOUR ti XX = PM PEAK HOUR � � 296(256)� � I �� 10(27) � � c� � o m � � � � a �I � �� C� °' v co FUTURE PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUME (2012) Gulf Coast Consulting, Inc. DATE: �� 9/201 1 °� Land Development Consulting �: �� . � � N:: �a � ,'� ��' ,zt DRAWN BY: �,,.,, MKC PROJECT NO: 11-023 FIGURE: � _, FUTURE ROADWAY CONDITIONS - 2012 Roadway Se�ment Midday_peak Midda�LOS PM peak PM LOS Causeway Blvd 1967 vph LOS B 2168 vph LOS B Mandalay Ave. 863 vph LOS C 955 vph LOS C Coronado Dr. 1452 vph LOS C 1588 vph LOS C Coronado Dr (S. of Gulfview) 862 vph LOS C 1015 vph LOS C East Shore Dr (Cswy — Baymont) 232 vph LOS C 250 vph LOS C As shown above all roadway segments and intersections would continue to operate at LOS C or better during both the midday and PM peak hours. IV. CONCLUSION This analysis was conducted in accordance with a specific methodology established with City of Clearwater staff. This analysis demonstrates traffic operations at nearby intersections and on adjacent roadways would continue at acceptable levels of service during both midday and PM peak hours with the proj ect impacts. 4 � /_�'' D►1� �. : Page 1 of 2 _, Robert Pergolizzi From: Robert Pergolizzi Sent: Tuesday, June 07, 2011 1:29 PM To: 'Himanshu.Patni@MyClearwater.com' Subject: RE: East Shore Hotel - Traffic Analysis I will do an evaluation of East Shore Drive, and show the volumes on East Shore in the vicintiy of the site. The volume on East Shore just north of the Causeway Bivd intersection would naturally be higher than that at Papaya. I will analyze driveway voulmes too. Robert Pergolizzi, AICP, PTP Gulf Coast Consulting, Inc. 13825 ICOT Boulevard, Suite 605 Clearwater, FI 33760 Phone: 727-524-1818 Fax: 727-524-6090 Cellphone: 727-644-2695 emaii: pergo@gulfcoastconsultinginc.com From: Himanshu.Patni@MyClearwater.com [mailto:Himanshu.Patni@MyClearwater.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 07, 2011 1:22 PM To: Robert Pergolizzi; Bennett.Elbo@myClearwater.com Cc: renee@northsideengineering.net Subject: RE: East Shore Hotel - Traffic Analysis Will you be doing anything to show the impacts on East Shore itself or the intersection of East Shore & Papaya? We all know it doesn't cany much traffic at the moment but I think it's important to make mention of what the impact would be on a two lane undivided street like this where the hotel's driveways are. I don't have any issues with using the counts from two weeks ago for this study. From: Robert Pergolizzi [mailto:pergo@gulfcoastconsultinginc.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 07, 2011 1:09 PM To: Patni, Himanshu; Elbo, Bennett Cc: Renee Ruggiero Subject: East Shore Hotel - Traffic Analysis Himanshu / Bennett - I laiow you met with Renee yesterday regarding DRC comments on the East Shore Hotel. I have been contacted to do the Traffic Impact Analysis for this project. The project is for 134 rooms and 32 marina slips. per ITE Trip generation 8th Edition, the project would generate 1190 dailytrips, and 72 PM peak hour trips. The PM peak hour of generator (early afternoon) is 86 trips. We recently conducted intersection turning movement counts for the Hooters/Starbucks proposed for Mandalay. As you required, these counts were conducted 11 AM - 2 PM, and 4-6 PM on Friday May 20 at the following intersections: Causeway / East Shore Mandalay / Baymont Coronado / S. Gulfview I plan on using this public information for my "Existing Conditions" analysis since the data is recent. There is no need to recount these intersections. I would then use the "future conditions" from the Hooters/Starbucks traffic analysis as my background traffic (this asssumes the Hooters/Starbucks is in place), and then ADD the traffc from the proposed hoteUmarina development to determine the "Total FutueTraffic° for this project. As such, the volumes will build upon the previous study. I will re-evaluate the intersections and roadways for both mid-day and PM peak 6/8/2011 Page 2 of 2 _, periods including the proposed project traffic. Written reports signed by me will be provided to Renee for submittal to the city. Please accept this as my proposed methodology. If you need a face-to-face meeting, let me laiow. Robert Pergolizzi, AICP, PTP Gulf Coast Consulting, Inc. 13825 ICOT Boulevard, Suite 605 Clearwater, F133760 Phone:727-524-1818 Fax:727-524-6090 Cellphone: 727-644-2695 email: pergo@gulfcoastconsultinginc.com 6/8/2011 2009 Pealc Season Factor Category Report - Report Type: ALL Category: 1500 PINELLAS COUNTYWIDE MOCE: 0.93 Weelc Dates SF PSCF 1 O1/Ol/2009 - O1/03/2009 1.10 1.18 2 O1/04/2009 - Ol/10/2009 1.07 1.14 3 O1/11/2009 - O1/17/2009 1.05 1.12 4 O1/18/2009 - O1/24/2009 1.03 1.10 5 O1/25/2009 - O1/31/2009 1.01 1.08 6 02/O1/2009 - 02/07/2009 0.99 1.06 7 02/OS/2009 - 02/14/2009 0.97 1.04 * 8 02/15/2009 - 02/21/2009 0.95 1.02 * 9 02/22/2009.- 02/28/2009 0.94 1.01 *10 03/01/2009 - 03/07/2009 0.93 1.00 *11 03/08/2009 - 03/14/2009 0.92 0.98 *12 03/15/2009 - 03/21/2009 0.91 0.97 *13 03/22/2009 - 03/28/2009 0.91 0.97 *14 03/29/2009 - 04/04/2009 0.92 0.98 *15 04/OS/2009 - 04/11/2009 0.92 0.98 *1G 04/12/2009 - 04/18/2009 0.93 1.00 *17 04/19/2009 - 04/25/2009 0.94 1.01 *18 04/26/2009 - OS/02/2009 0.95 1.02 *19 OS/03/2009 - OS/09/2009 0.96 1.03 *20 OS/10/2009 - OS/16/2009 0.97 1.D4 21 OS/17/2009 - OS/23/2009 0.97 1.04 22 OS/24/2009 - OS/30/2009 D.97 1.04 23 O5/31/2009 - 06/06/2009 0.97 1.04 24 06/07/2009 - 06/13/2009 0_97 1.04 25 06/14/2009 - 06/20/2009 0.97 1.04 26 06/21/2009 - 06/27/2009 0.98 1.05 27 06/26/2009 - 07/04/2009 0.98 1.05 28 07/OS/2009 - 0.7/11/2009 0.99 1.06 29 07/12/2009 - 07/18/2009 0.99 1.06 30 07/19/2009 - 07/25/2009 1.00 1.07 31 07/26/2009 - OB/O1/2009 1.00 1.07 32 08/02/2009 - 08/OB/2009 1.01 1.08 33 OB/09/2009 - 08/15/2009 1.01 1.08 34 OB/16/2009 - OB/22/2009 1.03 1.10 35 08/23/2009 - OB/29/2009 1.04 1.11 36 OB/30/2009 - 09/OS/2009 1.05 1.12 37 09/06/2009 - 09/12/2009 1.06 1.13 38 09/13/2009 - 09/19/2009 1.07 1.14 39 09/20/2009 - 09/26/2009 1.06 1.13 40 09/27/2009 - 10/03/2009 1.06 1.13 41 10/04/2009 - 10/10/2009 1.05 1.12 42 10/11/2009 - 10/17/2009 1.05 1.12 43 10/18/2009 - 10/24/2009 1.05 1.12 44 10/25/2009 - 10/31/2009 1.06 1.13 45 11/O1/2009 - 11/07/2009 1.07 1.14 46 11/08/2009 - 11/14/2009 1.08 1.16 47 11/15/2009 - 11/21/2009 1.08 1.16 48 11/22/2009 - 11/28/2009 1.09 1_17 99 11/29/2009 - 12/OS/2009 1.09 1.17 50 12/06/2009 - 12/12/2009 1.09 1.17 51 12/13/2009 - 12/19/2009 1.10 1.18 52 12/20/2009 - 12/26/2009 1.07 1.14 53 12/27/2009 - 12/31/2009 1.05 1.12 * Peals Season Page 1 of 2 . .� Type of peak hour being reported: Intersection Peak L�CATEOh1: E Shore Dr -- Causeway Blvd GITY/STATE: Clearwater Beach, FL __ 24 p.72 121 �a *� 2a a o .r t �. B00 4 D ,! t 121 « 897 0.91 897 �► 0.97 �. 776 0.94 as� � o z s o� es� *� t �► 0 0 0 � i ! p O.OD p J � � p �i f � �`' 0 � o � �«► i �►� � � « i .t�u ` �� t r� Period (Northbound) �ginning At Left Thru Ri ht U R* Lef 11:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 11:15AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 11:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 D 11:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 D 12:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 12:15PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 12:30PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 12:45PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 Method for determining peak hour: Total Entering Volume C�C JOB #: 10618702 Peak-Hour: 1:00 PM -- 2:00 PM Peak 15-Min: 1:45 PM -- 2:00 PM _ � t��ali��r �� 'F.kAr P�r�R :�-I„a 1 ,'r+. i.:U L�- i?:�'v F C r=•.:':.; 57pF � � t— 0.0 1.7 �i *� o.o o.o o.o .J +i 4 3.4 M 0.0 1 „��;� R. 1.7 f 3.2 4 2 �► `� 'i�! fV� ♦ 3.5 _.,:,,;,;�,. 4.2 r 0.0 'L ` � 0.0 �► 4.2 +t t P o.o o.o o.o �: t 0.0 0.0 � 0 0 0 � e+ i �. 0 � � 0 0 .! � 4 0 o '� r o *� t r� � o 0 0 � � ,� i 4 L-- � � �� « �r r Z � � 'i + (� � 0 3 0 0 0 203 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 183 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 175 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 206 0 0 0 B 0 0 0 199 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 169 0 0 0 6 D 0 0 195 0 0 ?� � � = �.� ~� �J � i!� �� u � Heavy Trucks 0 0 0 Pedestrians 0 Bicycies 0 0 0 Railroad Sto ed Buses Comments: Report generated on 5/25/2011 10:23 AM 0 0 0 0 40 0 �2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 211 22 0 0 222 26 0 0 188 37 0 0 205 23 0 0 208 31 0 0 223 33 0 24 8 0 0 0 0 R' = RTOR d Total Hourly I R* Totals 0 0 446 0 0 439 0 0 436 0 0 405 1726 0 0 436 1716 0 0 446 1723 0 0 432 1719 0 0 438 1752 Total 1872 72 12 0 SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http://www.qualitycounts.net) . y ype of peak hour being reported: Intersection Peak LOCATfON: E Shore Dr -- Causeway Blvd CITY/STATE: Clearwater Beach, FL 42 0.75 134 �a +� az o 0 .► i 4 813 b 0 ,� � 134 fe 905 0.96 1140.► 0.95 4 771 0.96 1146► D '� i 0 �►1140 Method for determining peak hour: Total Entering Volume QC JOB #: 10618701 DATE: 5/20/2011 Peak-Hour: 4:15 PM -- 5:15 PM Peak 15-Min: 4:15 PM -- 4:30 PM "1 * f� � 0 D 0 �Ut3�I'��' �pL.I�'!'�� a t� 0 0.00 0 ��..r. f� i�-1 �.r.�".:. '��t..i.......�'.�.�'. _h:tl�{..::-c`• J � � f 2 � � 0 � � � J �► i 4 � � r : �► ��'' « Z � � h t P � �qnF � � � �--� o.o o.o �a *� o.o o.o o.o e� ; 4 2.5 4 0.0 ,t a-`A:Y. '� O.D � 2.2 1 B �► `�S�I� ♦ 2.6 1.8 r0.0 Z i"fi/ C 0.0�! 1.8 �, t o o.o o.o o.o � + 1r 0.0 O.D 0 0 0 � � � 0 � �, 0 5 �► � f. 2 0 '� F 0 h t � � 0 0 0 � � d' i 4 � � .� rrw 4 A � � ♦ � � ��t * f"� I R' = RTOR Nin Count E Shore Dr E Shore Dr Causeway Blvd Causeway Blvd Period (Northbound) (South6ound) (Eastbound) (Vllestbound) Hourl �inning At Left Thru Ri ht U R* Left Thru Ri ht U R* Left Thru Ri ht U R" Left Thru Ri ht U R" Total Totals 4:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 0 0 0 266 0 0 0 0 182 29 0 0 489 4 30 PIVI 0 0 "0 9 0 r 0 0 � 7 0; ` 0 : 0� 289 �?: Gt 0� 0�'7 r" Os ,� 0�'196 34 . 0 0 5'� Bt r r • 445PI1� •� 0• �,0, . �D 0. 0 , Q , 0 �-11 , 0'� 0 :0 i290 ;: 0 0 0` 0 20��1 29 ; 0 0 631s � Zp86 �� 5i00"FM : 0: 0 '0 0':' 0. ,`;0 .` 0 ?': 7. . 0'�; 0 0 271'.�:y 0. ='0„ ., 0'= D:�17T ,� 35.. ;. 0. ;- 0 490,�' +: 2087�? 5:15 PM 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 11 0 0 0 275 0 0 0 0 214 27 0 0 527 2066 5:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 0 0 0 268 0 0 0 0 198 33 0 0 515 2063 5:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 0 0 0 226 0 0 0 0 214 27 0 0 481 2013 ``?� � �.`�i ie � �i Heavy Trucks D 0 0 Pedestrians 0 Bicycles 0 0 0 Railroad Sta ed Buses Comments: Report generated on 5/25/2011 10:23 AM ----� ir�� 0 0 0 44 0 0 0 '� � 3� � `i�S 0 16 0 0 20 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 2 0 Total 2192 36 44 3 SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http://www.qualitycounts.net) . . Type of peak hour being reported: Intersection Peak LOCATEOht: Mandalay Ave -- Baymont St GITYISi"ATE: Clearwater Beach FL 414 0.90 481 �a *� 13 363 38 J i �. 60 N 7 � i 123 1. 147 0.78 8 .► 0.94 N 5 0.76 57 �► 42 Z i 19 �► 60 Method for determining peak hour: Total Entering Volume QC JOB #: 10618704 DATE: 5/20/2011 Peak-Hour: 12:45 PM --1:45 PM Peak 15-Min: 1:15 PM --1:30 PM �h * I° � 48 351 14 a t '�U��9'��' ��3�1�"i'�'� 430 0.95 413 ��` C f f L P i'"1 1 e � Il t;:G..L�.t_.� .J"v _kLri..:�n:> � 51 � 94 � s� ; � r �� 61 � eo � �.+ a �� i � '�, F *L t �' � � � � � k ti � G 5.8 4.6 � + * L� 23.1 5.5 2.8 .� i 4 s.7 �oo � .,.$� i 2.4« 2.7 0 0 �► E �� 0.0 3.5 � 4.8 7 `�''-�, : 5.3 A 1.7 � t �► z.� s.a o.o �a t 5.3 4.8 0 1 0 � .� i 4 0 J�t 2 2 �► (�' � 0 o � r o ti t r � a o o � �.► a a� 1 rrr, 4 .► ��' « Z � �'1 t f' � I R" = RTOR -Min Count Mandalay Ave Mandalay Ave Baymont St Baymont St Period (Northbound) (Southbound) (Eastbound) (Westbound) Total Houriy aginning At Left Thru RI ht U R* Left Thru Ri ht U R* Left Thru Ri ht U R" Left Thru Ri ht U R" Totals 11:00 AM 9 69 6 1 1 7 77 4 0 0 2 2 6 0 12 3 0 15 1 5 240 11:15 AM 5 73 10 0 0 9 78 1 0 0 0 0 6 0 3 6 1 19 0 6 217 11:30 AM 2 89 3 1 0 6 85 3 0 0 0 0 4 0 2 3 2 22 0 0 222 11:45 AM 8 79 3 0 1 7 72 2 0 0 2 0 7 0 10 4 3 23 0 1 222 901 12:00 PM 11 71 4 1 0 14 95 2 0 0 2 0 4 0 6 6 0 22 0 1 239 900 12:15 PM B 87 1 2 0 9 75 1 0 0 3 0 B 0 2 3 2 23 0 2 226 909 12:30 PM 6 93 7 1 0 7 71 3 0 0 1 0 2 0 1 8 4 19 0 2 225 912 1:45 PM 4 81 8 0 0 10 104 1 0 1 3 1 3 0 B 10 3 28 0 0 265 1 I 3 3 S"L. z,�' SF ��.�-� �( �t, -� --�` �--"° �, —� ¢-- 5 �i � �rq � � �� a�' �a� «- Heary Trucks 0 24 0 0 20 4 Pedestrians 132 64 Bicycles 0 0 0 0 1 0 Railroad Sto ed Buses Commenis: Report generated on 5/25/2011 10:23 AM 0 0 0 100 0 2 0 ft Thru�Riaht �U R* Total 2 4 148 0 16 1092 0 0 4 52 72 368 0 0 0 3 SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http://www.qualitycounts.net) . , Type of peak hour being reported: Intersection Peak LOCATION: Mandalay Ave -- Baymont St CITY/STATE: Clearwater Beach FL 512 0.92 469 J; * � 16 453 43 ,.► i 4 66 4 12 ,} i 111 4. 154 0.65 3 �► 0.97 � 12 0.95 65 +� 50 Z r 31 �► 60 Method for determining peak hour: Total Entering Volume QC JOB #: 10618703 nnTC. Ci�ni�n�� Peak-Hour: 4:30 PM -- 5:30 PM Peak 15-Min: 4:45 PM -- 5:00 PM �'h * � � 43 346 14 �"��„��g�� '�.��{�� i t ��`°� 4 539 0.92 403 t�.1 F F:�-1 s,�!? i..i.1..t_.�_�i,:.i'., _E.�. h:.Jca � � � i" r Y :a; 172 � � 54 � 112 � �✓ i t.L� � � Z �+ i �� t �►� Period ainnina At � � � r k � �" 2.5 2.6 �s *� 0.0 2.6 2.3 .t i �► 0.0 ♦ 8.3 S ,n-�, Q 3.6 i� 3.9 f ,,. <n., 0 0 �► ;�� ' « 0.0 .:;a;:; �,:f'N . 3.1 �! 2.0 Z ' �` 6.5 .F 17 '! t f' o.D 2.0 0.0 � �' t 2.8 1.7 0 0 1 � e► i 4 0 1 �t 1 0 �► l'J'�i ° 4 0 o 'i � o h t O � 0 0 0 � � .► i 4 � '� �' � .�. �� « � 'L � � i ,r r► � R` = RTOR Baymont St Baymont St � (Eastbound) _ . _ (VVestbound) _ To�� Hourly 9 71 6 2 0 I 15 103 4 0 0 I 0 2 7 0 1 5:30 PM 10 77 6 2 1 10 93 2 0 0 1 8 12 0 5 7 2 21 0 0 257 1130 5:45 PM 10 87 2 0 0 4 95 2 0 0 0 2 6 0 2 7 1 18 0 1 237 1056 5 �= C7 ,`�"t I� �� l'Z � � �C._..lo� � �' F-- � � 4 °� —`� �-- � ra ��r' q2.��lEr- Peak 15-Min Northbound Southbc Flowrates Left Thru Ri ht U R* Left Thru Ri h All Vehicles 72 332 12 12 0 48 456 4 Heavy Trucks D 20 0 0 16 0 Pedestrians 84 52 Bicycles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Railroad Sto ed Buses Comments: Report generated on 5/25/2011 10:23 AM 0 0 0 136 0 0 0 ft Thru`Ripht YU R' Total 4 12 116 0 4 1244 8 0 4 46 56 328 0 0 0 0 SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http://www.qualitycounts.net) . � ype of peak hour being reported: Intersection PeaF Lf?CATIQM1I: Coronado Dr -- S Gulfview Blvc CITY/STATE: Clearwater Beach, FL 663 0.93 703 � i * � 360 303 0 ✓ i 4 sso � 2sa s t o f. o 0.92 0 +► 0.97 � 0 0.00 ze� � z� 's r o� o Method for determining peak hour: Total Entering Volume QC JOB #: 10618706 DATE: 5/20/2011 Peak-Hour: 12:15 PM --1:15 PM Peak 15-Min: 12:15 PM --12:30 PM �'h t P � + aas t� i�U2�� 9�''�f' �C1ll�i e� 331 0.93 450 r�1PJ ff R'w"Ic �s .`h �+'7..1...._ � bNi� _.EE: � i;Ja_'�• � � � r �� 4 � r; D � 45 � J .t i t. L� J t w� n �► '. N z r ��, t r� �JJ11 � � � �. TT � 3.5 4.8 + t 2.5 4.8 0.0 .� i 4 2.5 � 5.B ,� ,�,�. � 0.0 1• 0.0 'o-: "r 0 0 �► �� « 0.0 ;;_,,>;z�. 6.0 ♦ 7.4 1 ' �' 0.0 A 0.0 h t P 0.0 4.2 0.0 � � � 4.8 4.2 � 0 1 0 � .% i �. 0 S t 0 0 �► � � 0 o � r o h t A j'� � 0 1 o I � ✓ i t. � , ,,,wr 4 �► � � �s z c �ti t r►� R• = RTOR -Min Count Coronado Dr Coronado Dr S Gulfview Bivd S Gulfview Blvd Period (Northbound) (Southbound) (Eastbound) (Vllestbound) Hourl �ginning At Left Thru Ri ht U R* Left Thru Ri ht U R" Left Thru Ri ht U R` Left Thru Ri ht U R" Total Totals 11:00 AM 0 119 0 0 0 0 85 77 0 0 72 0 3 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 358 11:15 AM 0 112 0 0 0 0 74 98 0 0 53 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 339 11:30 AM 0 101 0 0 0 0 88 87 0 0 62 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 342 11:45 AM 0 94 0 0 0 0 58 92 0 0 49 0 4 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 298 1337 12:00 PM 0 110 0 0 0 0 78 68 0 0 48 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 308 1287 1:15 PM 0 106 0 0 0 0 75 64 0 0 72 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 340 1375 1:30 PM 0 107 0 D 0 0 77 76 0 0 65 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 326 1375 1:45 PM 0 117 0 0 0 0 71 83 0 0 74 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 351 1375 � � = � ,`� � �°i� ?>�9 � � '`�� t� ��r � � ' 4�a Peak 15-Min Heavy Trucks 0 12 0 Pedestrians 60 Bicycles 0 0 0 Railroad Sto ed Buses Commenfs: Report generated on 5/25/2011 10:23 AM 0 16 B 8 0 4 D 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 R Thru Ripht U R* Total 0 0 0 0 0 1436 0 0 0 48 0 64 0 0 0 0 SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http://www.qualitycounts.net) Type of peak hour being reported: Intersection Peak L�CAT60N: Coronado Dr -- S Gulfview Bivd GITY/STATE: Clearwater Beach FL 652 0.93 857 �a *� 285 367 0 J i �► 285 �. 294 J i 0�s 0 0.85 0 .► 0.93 �. o o.00 304 �► 10 7 : 0�► D Method for determining peak hour: Total Entering Volume QC JOB #: 10618705 DATE: 5/20/2011 Peak-Hour: 4:00 PM -- 5:00 PM z.a �.a Peak 15-Min: 4:00 PM -- 4:15 PM � i *� 3.2 2.5 0.0 .� i 4 3.2 ♦ 2.4 S ,="w � 0.0 « 0.0 �>�. � _� 0.0 � �'�;`o� � 0.0 h t P � 2.8 +► 10.Oi �� '��Y � 0.0 �► 0.0 h t r' i� � + ass * �IL12�i.1��/ ��i,l�'1'�� o.o �.a o.o1II 377 0.93 563 -r�r�.I�:Pr:=R-r�?1�::��.: �.,+,,rn � i f 1 ❑ ,_,�i _. L,� C. i:,:�'�5 : E t: `.� tr :� ; 2.7 1.4 � � I� f+ 3 � ,! _;? � p � ,'� � 29 � � �J i 4 � > < ,► „� �� . « z � �� t �� Min Count Coronado Dr Period (Northbound) �innina At LPft Th�u Rieht u ��J11 k Coronado Dr 2 1 0 .+ i 4 t s e, o 0 ■► . ,,�iJ�:` � 0 � o z ' r o �L t (' � 0 9 0 � rr� S Gulfview Bivd � .� i �. I� � _ � .► ■� « z � ~ � �� t P� R' = RTOR S Gulfview Blvd T.(Westbound) ^, To�� Hourly 5:00 PM 0 145 0 0 D 0 92 77 0 0 76 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 392 1504 5:15 PM 0 121 0 0 0 0 80 85 1 0 93 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 380 1489 5:30 PM 0 134 0 0 0 0 81 62 0 0 72 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 349 1488 5:45 PM 0 125 0 0 0 0 92 63 0 0 58 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 342 1463 �� = �? �� ,� �,.�e� � � 2 `?s� --� c o �° �. � � a �� Heavy Trucks 0 4 0 0 6 12 Pedestrians 8 0 Bicycfes 0 3 0 0 0 1 Railroad Sto ed Buses Commenfs: Report generated on 5/25/2011 10:23 AM 8 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 rotal 1628 32 12 4 SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http://www.qualitycounts.net) Two-Way Stop Control Page 1 of 1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information nal st RP Intersection CAUSEWAY/EAST enc /Co. GCC SHORE Date Performed 5/25/2011 Jurisdiction CLEARWATER nal sis Year 2011 EXISTING nal sis Time Period MIDDAY PEAK Pro'ect Descri tion East/West Street: CAUSEW,4Y BLVD North/South Street: EAST SHORE RT ONLY Intersection Orientation: East-West Stud Period hrs : 0.25 ehicle Volumes and Ad'ustments Ma'or Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R olume veh/h 870 753 117 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.97 0.97 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 896 0 0 776 120 veh/h Percent Heav Vehicies 0 -- -- � -- -- Median Type Raised curb RT Channelized 0 � Lanes 0 2 0 0 2 0 Confi uration T T TR U stream Si nal 0 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R olume veh/h 23 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 0 0 0 0 23 veh/h Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 2 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 � RT Channelized � � Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 1 Configuration R Dela , Queue Len th, and Level of Service pproach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration R v (veh/h) 23 C (m) (veh/h) 609 v/c 0. 04 95% queue length 0.12 Control Delay (s/veh) 11.1 LOS B pproach Delay (s/veh) -- -- 11.1 pproach LOS -- -- 8 Copyright O 2010 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.6 Generated: 5/25/2011 3:03 PM file://C:\Documents and Settings�rpergolizzi.GULFCOAST\Local Settings\Temp\u2k43.tmp 5/25/2011 Two-Way Stop Control Page 1 of 1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information nal st RP Intersection CAUSEWAY/EAST enc /Co. GCC SHORE Date Performed 5/25/2011 Jurisdiction CLEARW,4TER nal sis Time Period PM PEAK nal sis Year 2011 EXISTING Pro'ect Descri tion EastlWest Street: CAUSEWAY BLVD North/South Street: EAST SHORE RT ONLY Intersection Orientation: East-West Stud Period hrs : 0.25 ehicle Volumes and Ad'ustments Ma'or Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R olume veh/h 1106 748 130 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 1164 0 0 787 936 veh/h Percent Heav Vehicles 0 -- -- 0 -- -- Median Type Raised curb RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 2 0 0 2 0 Confi uration T T TR U stream Si nal 0 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R olume veh/h 41 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 0 0 0 0 42 veh/h Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 2 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 1 Configuration R Dela , Queue Len th, and Level of Service pproach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration R v (veh/h) 42 C (m) (veh/h) 598 v/c 0.07 95% queue length 0.23 Control Delay (s/veh) 11.5 LOS 8 pproach Delay (s/veh) -- -- 11.5 pproach LOS -- -- B Copyright O 2010 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS+rM Version 5.6 Generated: 5/25/2011 3:06 PM file://C:\Documents and Settings�rpergolizzi.GULFCOAST\Local Settings\Temp\u2k43.tmp 5/25/2011 Detailed Report Page 1 of 1 HCS+'" DETAILED REPORT General Information Siie Informafion Analyst RP Intersection MANDALAY/BAYMONT Agency or Co. GCC Area Type All other areas Date Performed 5/25/2019 Jurisdiction CLEARWATER Time Period M/DDAY PEAK Analysis Year 2011 EXIST/NG Project ID Volume and Timin In ut Eg WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Number of Lanes, N� 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 2 0 Lane Group LTR LTR LTR LTR Volume, V(vph) 7 8 41 19 5 119 47 340 14 37 352 13 % Heavy Vehicles, %HV 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.94 0.93 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Pretimed (P) or Actuated (A) A A A A A A A A A A A A Start-up Lost Time, I� 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Extension of Effective Green, e 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival Type, AT 3 3 3 3 Unit Extension, UE 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Fiitering/Metering, I 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Initial Unmet Demand, Qb 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Ped / Bike / RTOR Volumes 94 0 15 61 0 11 80 0 0 51 0 0 Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Parking / Grade / Parking N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N Parking Maneuvers, Nm Buses Stopping, Ns 0 0 0 0 Min. Time for Pedestrians, Gp 3.6 3.5 3.6 3.4 Phasing EW Perm 02 03 04 NS Perm 06 07 08 G= 14.0 G= G= G= G= 38.0 G= G= G= Timing Y= 4 Y= Y= Y= Y= 4 Y= Y= Y= Duration of Analysis, T= 0.25 Cycle Length, C= 60.0 Lane Grou Ca aci , Confrol Dela , and LOS Determination EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Adjusted Flow Rate, v 44 140 427 427 Lane Group Capacity, c 381 372 1959 2007 v/c Ratio, X 0.12 0.38 0.22 0.21 Total Green Ratio, g/C 0.23 0.23 0.63 0.63 Uniform Delay, d� 18.1 19.3 4.7 4.7 Progression Factor, PF 1.000 1.000 9.000 1.000 Delay Calibration, k 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 Incremental Delay, d2 0.1 0.6 0.1 0.1 Initial Queue Delay, d3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Control Delay 18.3 20.0 4.7 4.7 Lane Group LOS 8 8 A A Approach Delay. 18.3 20.0 4.7 4.7 Approach LOS 8 8 A A Intersection Delay 7.4 X� = 0.26 Intersection LOS A Copyright �O 2007 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.3 Generated: 5/25l2011 3:22 PM file://C:\Documents and Settings�rpergolizzi.GULFCOAST\Local Settings\Temp\s2k5C.tmp 5/25/2011 , Detailed Report Page 1 of 1 HCS+'" DETAILED REPORT General lnformation Site lnformation Analyst RP Intersection MANDALAY/BAYMONT Agency or Co. GCC Area Type All other areas Date Performed 5/25/2011 Jurisdiction CLEARWATER Time Period PM PEAK Analysis Year 2011 EXISTING Project ID Volume and Timin In ut EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Number of Lanes, N� 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 2 0 Lane Group LTR LTR LTR LTR Volume, V(vph) 12 3 49 30 12 108 42 336 14 42 439 16 % Heavy Vehicles, %HV 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 Pretimed (P) or Actuated (A) A A A A A A A A A A A A Start-up Lost Time, I� 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Extension of Effective Green, e 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival Type, AT 3 3 3 3 Unit Extension, UE 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Filtering/Metering, I 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Initial Unmet Demand, Qb 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Ped / Bike / RTOR Volumes 172 0 15 54 0 11 112 0 D 33 0 0 Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Parking / Grade / Parking N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N Parking Maneuvers, Nm Buses Stopping, Na 0 0 0 0 Min. Time for Pedestrians, Gp 4.0 3.4 3.7 3.3 Phasing EW Perm 02 03 04 NS Perm 06 07 08 G= 14.0 G= G= G= G= 38.0 G= G= G= Timing Y= 4 Y= Y= Y= Y= 4 Y= Y= Y= Duration of Analysis, T= 0.25 Cycle Length, C= 60.0 Lane Grou Ca aci , Control Dela , and LOS Determinafion EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Adjusted Flow Rate, v 53 153 430 546 Lane Group Capacity, c 364 368 1946 2004 v/c Ratio, X 0.15 0.42 0.22 0.27 Total Green Ratio, g/C 0.23 0.23 0.63 0.63 Uniform Delay, d� 18.3 19.5 4.7 4.9 Progression Factor, PF 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Delay Calibration, k 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 Incremental Delay, d2 0.2 0.8 0.1 0.1 Initial Queue Delay, d3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Control Delay 18.4 20.3 4.7 4.9 Lane Group LOS ' 8 C A A Approach Delay 18.4 20.3 4.7 4.9 Approach LOS 8 C A A Intersection Delay 7.5 X� = 0.31 Intersection LOS A Copyright OO 2007 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.3 Generated: 5/25/2011 3:25 PM file://C:\Documents and Settulgs�rpergolizzi.GULFCOAST\Local Settings\Temp\s2k5C.tmp 5/25/2011 Detailed Report Page 1 of 1 HCS+"" DETAILED REPORT General Information Site Information Analyst RP Intersection CORONADO/GULFVIEW Agency or Co. GCC Area Type All other areas Date Performed 5/25/2011 Jurisdiction CLEARWATER Time Period MIDDAY PEAK Analysis Year 2011 EXISTING Project ID Volume and Timin !n ui EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Number of Lanes, N� 2 0 0 2 2 2 Lane Group L LR LT T R Volume, V(vph) 246 26 1 436 294 349 % Heavy Vehicles, %HV 2 2 2 2 2 2 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 Pretimed (P) or Actuated (A) A A A A A A Start-up Lost Time, I� 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Extension of Effective Green, e 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival Type, AT 3 3 3 3 3 Unit Extension, UE 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Filtering/Metering, I 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Initial Unmet Demand, Qb 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Ped / Bike / RTOR Volumes 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 45 0 0 Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Parking / Grade / Parking N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N Parking Maneuvers, Nm Buses Stopping, Na 0 0 0 0 0 Min. Time for Pedestrians, GP 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.4 Phasing EB Only 02 03 04 NS Perm 06 07 08 G= 22.0 G= G= G= G= 30.0 G= G= G= Timing Y= 4 Y= Y= Y= Y= 4 Y= Y= Y= Duration of Analysis, T= 0.25 Cycle Length, C= 60.0 Lane Grou Ca aci , Control Dela , and LOS Determination Eg WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Adjusted Flow Rate, v 254 27 450 303 360 Lane Group Capacity, c 1260 580 1693 1774 1402 v/c Ratio, X 0.20 0.05 0.27 0.17 0.26 Total Green Ratio, g/C 0.37 0.37 0.50 0.50 0.50 Uniform Delay, d� 13.0 12.2 8.6 8.2 �.6 Progression Factor, PF 9.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Delay Calibration, k 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 Incremental Delay, d2 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.1 Initial Queue Delay, d3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Control Delay 13.1 12.3 8.7 8.2 8.7 Lane Group LOS 8 8 A A A Approach Delay 13.0 8.7 8.5 Approach LOS g A A Intersection Delay g,g X� = 0.24 Intersection LOS A Copyright � 2007 University of Florida, AII Rights Reserved HCS+rM Version 5.3 Generated: 5/25/2011 3:35 PM file://C:\Documents and Settings�rpergolizzi.GULFCOAST\Local Settings\Temp\s2k7E.tmp 5/25/2011 Detailed Report Page 1 of 1 HCS+'� DETAILED REPORT Genera/ Informafion Site lnformation Analyst RP Intersection CORONADO/GULFV/EW Agency or Co. GCC Area Type A!I other areas Date Performed 5/25/2011 Jurisdiction CLEARWATER Time Period PM PEAK Analysis Year 2011 EX/STING Project ID Volume and Timin ln ut EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Number of Lanes, N� 2 0 0 2 2 2 Lane Group L LR LT T R Volume, V(vph) 285 10 0 563 356 276 % Heavy Vehicles, %HV 2 2 2 2 2 2 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 Pretimed (P) or Actuated (A) A A A A A A Start-up Lost Time, I� 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Extension of Effective Green, e 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival Type, AT 3 3 3 3 3 Unit Extension, UE 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Filtering/Metering, I 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Initial Unmet Demand, Qb 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Ped / Bike / RTOR Volumes 4 D 0 0 0 0 0 45 0 0 Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Parking / Grade / Parking N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N Parking Maneuvers, Nm Buses Stopping, NB 0 0 0 0 0 Min. Time for Pedestrians, Gp 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.4 Phasing EB Only 02 03 04 NS Perm 06 07 08 G= 22.0 G= G= G= G= 30.0 G= G= G= Timing Y= 4 Y= Y= Y= Y= 4 Y= Y= Y= Duration of Analysis, T= 0.25 Cycle Length, C= 60.0 Lane Grou Ca aci , Contro/ Dela , and LOS Determination EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Adjusted Flow Rate, v 306 11 605 383 297 Lane Group Capacity, c 1260 580 1774 1774 1402 v/c Ratio, X 0.24 0.02 0.34 0.22 0.21 Total Green Ratio, g/C 0.37 0.37 0.50 0.50 0.50 Unifiorm Delay, d� 13.2 12.1 9.0 8.4 8.4 Progression Factor, PF 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Delay Calibration, k 0.11 0.11 0.19 0.11 0.11 Incremental Delay, d2 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 Initial Queue Delay, d3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Control Delay 13.3 12.1 9.2 8.5 8.5 Lane Group LOS 8 8 A A A Approach Delay 13.3 9.2 8.5 Approach LOS B A A Intersection Delay g, 7 X� = 0.30 Intersection LOS A Copyright O 2007 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.3 Generated: 5/25/2011 3:38 PM file://C:\Documents and Settings�rpergolizzi.GULFCOAST\Local Settings\Temp\s2k7E.tmp 5/25/2011 TABLE 4 Generalized Peak Fiour Two-W�y Volumes for Florida's Urbaniaed Areas SO/4/10 STATE SIGNALIZED ARTERIALS FREEWAYS C1asS I(>0.00 to 1.99 signalized intersections per mile) Lanes B C D E Lanes Median B C D E 4 4,000 5,500 6,770 7,300 2 Undivided 930 1,500 1 *** 6 6,000 8,320 10,150 11,290 4 Divided 2,840 3,440 3 560 *** 8 8,000 11,050 13,480 15,270 6 Divided 4,370 5,200 5,360 *** l0 10,000 13,960 16,930 19,250 8 Divided 5,900 6,970 7,160 *** 12 13,730 18,600 21,950 23,230 �u��`'� Freeway Adjustments C1asS II (2.00 to 4.50 signalized intersections per mile) Auaciliary Ramp Lanes Median B C D E Lanes Metering 2 Undivided ** 1,020 1,480 1,570 + 1,800 + 5% 4 Divided ** 2,420 3,220 3,400 6 Divided ** 3,790 4,880 5,150 j�INTERRUPTED FLOW HIGHWAYS � Divided ** S,15g 6 530 6 880 �� e��{ ! v'7 l�a a�t3 ' Lanes Median B C D E LR Crt�t Zt�n�r�e..rL•f;? 2,t43� Z9oa 2 Undivided 730 1,460 2,080 2,620 Class III/IV (more than 4.50 signalized intersections per mile) L,anes Median B C D E 4 Divided 3,220 4,660 6,040 6,840 z Undivided ** 500 1,150 1,440 6 Divided 4,840 6,990 9,060 10,280 4 Divided ** 1,220 2,730 3,100 Uninterrupted Flow Highway Adjustments 6 Divided ** 1,910 4,240 4,fi80 Lanes Median Exclusive left lanes Adjusiment factors 8 Divided *� 2,620 5,770 6,280 2 Divided Yes +5% Multi Undivided Yes -5°/a Multi Undivided No -25% Non-State Signalized Roadway Adjustments SICYCLE MODEZ (Alter corresponding state volumes by the indicated percent.) (Multiply motorized vehicle volumes shown below by number of directional roadway lanes to deternune two-way maximum service volumes.) Major City/County Roadways - 10% Paved Shoulder/ Bicycle Lane Other Signalized Roadways - 35% C`r�•�s� Coverage B C D E 0-49% ** 310 1,180 >1,180 State & Non-State Signalized Roadway Adjustments 50-84% 240 360 >360 *** (Alter corresponding state volumes by the indicated percent.) 85-100% 620 >620 *** *** Divided/[Jndivided & Turn Lane Adjustments 2 Exclusive Exclusive Adjustment PEDESTRIAN MODE Lanes Median Left Lanes Right Lanes FaC (Multiply motorized vehicle volumes shown below by number of directional 2 Divided Yes No +5° roadway lanes to determine tv✓o-way maximum service volumes.) ? 2 Undivided No No -20% 5idewalk Coverage B C D E Multi Undivided Yes No -5% 0-49% �* ** 480 1,390 Multi Undivided No No -25% 50-84% ** "* 1,100 1,820 - Yes + 5% 85-100% ** 1,100 1,820 >1,820 One-Wa Facili Ad'ustment BUS MODE (Scheduled Fized Route)3 Y iY ] (Buses in peak hour in peak direction) Multiply the conesponding two-direc C al volum� in this t�able by 0.6. Sidewalk Coverage B C D E �C6`� �a�U PE -- - --- o-s4% >5 >4 >3 >2 2L,� Cc�� 4i4o �oz� 85-l00% >4 >3 >2 >1 � Values shown are presented as hourly two-way volumes for levels of service and aze for the airtomobIle/truck modes unless specifically stated Although presented as peak hour two- way volumes, they actually represent peak hour peak direction conditions with an applicable D factor applied. This table does not constitute a standazd and should be used only for general planning applicarions. T'he computer models from wluch this table is derived should be used for more specific planning applications. The table and deriving computer models should not be used fnr comdor or intersection design, where more refined techniques eadst Calculations aze based on planning applications of the Fiighway Capacity Manual, Bic}�cle LOS Model, Pedestrian LOS Model and Transit Capacity and Quality of Service Manual, respectively for the automobile/truck, bicycle, pedestrian and bus modes. ' Level of service for the bicycle and pedeshian modes in this table is based on number of motorized vehicles, not number of bicyclists or pedestrians using the facility. 3 Buses per hour shown aze only for the peak hour m the single duection of the higher ha�c flow. SouYCe: T* Ca�ot be a�i�eved using rable i�put va�ue ae�,�cs. Florida Deparnnent of Transportation *** Not applicahle for that level of service letter grade. For the automobile mode, volumes greater than level of service D Systems Planning Office become F because intersectiori capacities have been reached. For the bicycle mode, the level of service letter grade (including 60� Suwannee Street, MS 19 F) is not achievable because there is no maximum vetricle volume threshold using table input value defaults. T2]122125S00, FL 32399-0450 www.dot.state.fl.us/plannin�/svstems/sm/los/default.shtm 2009 FDOT QUALITY/LEVEL OF SERVICE HANDBOOK ' " � � : _.._.__. ___ _. __ G . .._... _ __--.--> __........ ____._ _ .___ � c`� _._.._----- Hotel (310) Average Vehicle Trip Ends vs: Rooms On a: Weekday Number of Studies: 10 Average Number of Rooms: 476 Directional Distribution: 50% entering, 50% exiting Trip Generation per Room Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation 8.17 3.47 - 9.58 3.38 Data Plot and Equation � � c W Q H a> U .0 a> > � w c� a`> � Q n � 1 S,ODU 17,000 16,000 15,000 14,000 13,000 12,000 11,000 10,000 9,�� 8,000 7,000 s,000 5,000 4,000 3,000 2,000 1,000 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 1900 X = Number of Rooms X Actual Data Points Fitted Curve ------ Average Rate Fitted Curve Equation: T- 8.95(X) - 373.16 R2 = 0.98 Trip Generation, 8th Edition 580 Institute of Transportation Engineers � ' � �' w��;;:;: Resort Hotel (330) Average Vehicle Trip Ends vs: Occupied Rooms On a: Weekday, P.M. Peak Hour of Generator Number of Studies: 7 Average Number of Occupied Rooms: 434 Directional Distribution: 50% entering, 50% exiting Trip Generation per Occupied Room Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation 0.59 0.36 - 1.06 0.79 Data Plot and Equation m � c W Q F � U L a� > a� � c� a� > Q u H 500 400 300 200 100 � 200 , �. , . •X �� X ; , : ; x : x� ,'X X; � . 300 400 500 600 X= Number of Occupied Rooms X Actual Data Points Fitted Curve Fitted Curve Equation: T= 0.36(X) + 99.68 Trip Generation, Sth Edition 649 700 800 900 ------ Average Rate RZ = 0.64 Institute of Transportation Engineers Resort Hotel (330) Average Vehicle Trip Ends vs: Occupied Rooms On a: Weekday, rt� Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic, `+ One Hour Between 4 and 6 p.m. ;;I ,; � Number of Studies: 10 Average Number of Occupied Rooms: 429 Directional Distribution: 43% entering, 57% exiting i Trip Generation per Occupied Room Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation 0.49 0.27 - 0.72 0.70 '�1 I�� Data Plot and Equation � a c W � F-� a> U L N � � � N N Q I I � 500 400 300 200 100 . X , - - - - , - . . . ,- - - - - - , -,- - - - - - - �:` - - - , -X- - � - - - - - - - - ..-------r------X--,--------�-,-- - ----------,- ----�--�--,--------- . , . X-------, ---------, . . .�. � X. , , . �� ' , , . . . . 0� 100 200 300 400 500 600 X= Number of Occupied Rooms X Actual Data Points Fitted Curve Fitted Curve Equation: Ln(T) = 1.13 Ln(X) -1.52 Trip Generation, 8th Edition 647 700 800 900 ------ Average Rate R2 = 0.88 Institute of Transportation Engineers � '� ,. ;� � a �,;, �; 0 Marina (420) Average Vehicle Trip Ends vs: Berths On a: Weekday Number of Studies: 11 Average Number of Berths: 386 Directional Distribution: 50% entering, 50% exiting Trip Generation per Berth Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation 2.96 1.91 - 10.04 2.26 Data Plot and Equation 6,000 5,000 � � 4,000 W Q F— a> U L � 3,000 � c� N > Q �� 2,000 H 1,000 , , , - ; : ; : ; ; :' ; : ; : : ��' ; ; ; : ' ��' : : : ; � : : : i�'�--�X- �-- : -- - -- �- - �---- � �-- -�-- - X , , , , X.'. X; : : : 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 X = Number of Berths X Actual Data Points Fitted Curve Average Rate Fitted Curve Equation: T= 1.89(X) + 410.80 Trip Generation, Sth Edition 733 R2 = 0.92 Institute of Transportation Engineers � , '�- i ; :; j _I � ;,;� i �._r._",,�i.. i :� ,� :� 4:i �, A}i r r E; :y.. �';; tS Marina (420) Average Vehicle Trip Ends vs: On a: Berths Weekday, P.M. Peak Hour of Generator Number of Studies: 3 Average Number of Berths: 825 Directional Distribution: 51 % entering, 49% exiting Trip Generation per Berth Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation 0.21 Data Plot and Equation � -a c W � F— � U � N �. � � (i N Q I I H 400 300 2�� 100 0 0.18 - 0.30 Caution - Use Carefully - Small Samp/e Size : X X . , , 300 400 500 600 700 S00 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 X Actual Data Points Fitted Curve Equation: Not given Trip Generation, 8th Edition X = Number of Berths 737 '----- Average Rate R2 _ ***,r Institute of Transportation Engineers i �;;,: � P'),°. �,^-, `, '':, � # ; � ,';;' Marina (420) Average Vehicle Trip Ends vs: Berths On a: Weekday, Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic, One Hour Between 4 and 6 p.m. Number of Studies: 2 Average Number of Berths: 362 Directional Distribution: 60% entering, 40% exiting Trip Generation per Berth Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation 0.19 0.17 - 0.21 " Trip Generation, 8th Edition 735 Institute of Transportation Engineers Two-Way Stop Control Page 1 of 1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY , ,e . Ge.�era��,I�fojrmat�on F � . . � ��..e �n; � �rr,_�a iar� �' � Analyst RP Intersection CAUSEWAY/EAST Agency/Co. GCC SHORE Date Performed 9/21/2011 Jurisdiction CLEARWATER Analysis Time Period MIDDAY PEAK Analysis Year FUTURE CONDITIONS Pro�ect Descri tion East/West Street: CAUSEWAY BLVD North/South Street: EAST SHORE RT ONLY Intersection Orientation: East-West Stud Period hrs : 0.25 eh�c. rt o es an... .,�#d u� men�s .�,��.�,�.�� ..�.a.uri�.a .. � � . Ma'or Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume veh/h 980 835 152 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.97 0.97 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 1010 0 0 860 156 veh/h Percent Heav Vehicles 0 -- -- 0 -- -- Median Ty e Raised curb RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 2 0 0 2 0 Confi uration T T TR U stream Si nal 0 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume veh/h 6� Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 0 0 0 0 69 veh/h Percent Heav Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 2 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Fiared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 1 Confi uration R ^"�"",. . �"" r't�;�,m��"�� ,,�t'�'' '�'��' �er°-r-"nuM'�aa�n"`�:.�.� �*' � �� !. � �� a3.�, ��.s ��.�. � . �d�� i��'+��. �kr � #��u ,a^�; �ela � ��Queue<Lerr � th� � and� LQvel, of= Se�rvice . �� ,�� E�� .,��`, �-� �° � � � �`_ �� '�� ;_ .° ,� �� . �. H . �� .� ` �,� �., � Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration R v (veh/h) 69 C (m) (veh/h) 563 v/c 0.12 95% queue length 0.42 Control Delay (s/veh) 12.3 LOS B Approach Delay (s/veh) -- -- 12.3 Approach LOS -- -- B Copyright O 2010 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.6 Generated: 9/21/2011 10:32 AM file://C:\Documents and Settings�rpergolizzi.GULFCOAST\Local Settings\Temp\u2k33.tmp 9/21/2011 Two-Way Stop Control Page 1 of 1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Ge�e�ral�ir�formation �, � .:� U �: ��.. r� 3.z �� =S�e��orma �,o.�. � �"' Analyst RP Intersection CAUSEW,4Y/EAST Agency/Co. GCC SHORE Date Performed 9/21/2011 Jurisdiction CLEARWATER Analysis Time Period PM PEAK Analysis Year FUTURE CONDITIONS Pro'ect Descri tion EastJWest Street: CAUSEW,4Y BLVD North/South Street: EAST SHORE RT ONLY Intersection Orientation: East-West Stud Period hrs : 0.25 �eR}��c�e�'.��lumes �n _, ,A►d ustmen. e . . ...... .�..e, . _ ,_,,�, �,, w . � , . _ w �. d �. m� .N Ma'or Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume veh/h 1202 809 157 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 1265 0 0 851 165 veh/h Percent Heav Vehicles 0 -- -- 0 -- -- Median T pe Raised curb RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 2 0 0 2 0 Confi uration T T TR U stream Si nal 0 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume veh/h 83 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 0 0 0 0 87 (veh/h) Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 2 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 1 Confi uration R ^'�Wr, :.#��, ?-^s'+,il�,r ^^aa„'LF^!a?i,.ro .... "s^A.�' °��'�ss:-?r �°^r—'�..::.5'„i9'^^T�y;y",�`g�.'^�'l. 'f �,�"J fi°� Ta'4 -� s^I i�� "�1} 9 ; .� a , `�G'�ry°;tid ,yEia .*, em.Tp'.'p.� y : 6"3 .,�""•-f"�,' Dela ��„4ueue3 Len th and�Level„of�Service�� .��{.��;�.°�� *�� .;:1 .�. � !� 7��r,.�� '��, �� M��dnx� �, ,.�`��,��:�� ?�`:n Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration R v (veh/h) 87 C (m) (veh/h) 563 v/c 0.15 95% queue length 0.54 Control Delay (s/veh) 12.6 LOS B Approach Delay (s/veh) -- -- 12.6 Approach LOS -- I -- I g Copyright O 2010 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.6 Generated: 9/21/2011 10:34 AM file://C:\Documents and Settings�rpergolizzi.GULFCOAST\Local Settings\Temp\u2k37.tmp 9/21/2011 Detailed Report Page 1 of 1 . r.�� _ � � � :� HCS+'" DETAILED REPORT �` . ��. � �,.� ,. .� ,G@Re/a/��!)f0!!qa#1071 *r �`. ��,�. i��:' t`i, .., r_..'_ �. � �, . � .., � � �/hf0�lila� %� �w., � " ��rss�� .� �� ;�:,,.g, � � 1� „ Analyst RP Intersection MANDALAY/BAYMONT Agency or Co. GCC Area Type All other areas Date Performed 9/21/2011 Jurisdiction CLEARWATER Time Period MIDDAY PEAK Analysis Year FUTURE CONDIT/ONS Project ID '"C , „PA'ti}f �""""' ""1'�Pt'd:'Xfl4(li§�* . Y3PP � . . q .. � zolU�e�anal�Tim�n ;!n u. ° �� . . �. . � . �� _ . . _ .._ . . . EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Number of Lanes, N� 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 2 0 Lane Group LTR LTR LTR LTR Volume, V(vph) 7 8 44 20 5 124 49 362 14 38 374 13 % Heavy Vehicles, %HV 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Pretimed (P) or Actuated (A) A A A A A A A A A A A A Start-up Lost Time, I� 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 � Extension of Effective Green, e 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival Type, AT 3 3 3 3 Unit Extension, UE 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Filtering/Meterin , I 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Initial Unmet Demand, Qb 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Ped / Bike / RTOR Volumes 94 0 15 61 0 11 80 0 0 51 0 0 Lane �dth 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Parking / Grade / Parking N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N Parking Maneuvers, Nm Buses Stopping, NB 0 0 0 0 Min. Time for Pedestrians, Gp 3.6 3.5 3.6 3.4 Phasing EW Perm 02 03 04 NS Perm 06 07 08 Timing G= 14.0 G= G= G= G= 38.0 G= G= G= Y= 4 Y= Y= Y= Y= 4 Y= Y= Y= Duration of Analysis, T= 0.25 Cycle Length, C= 60.0 Lane�Grou �Ca aci �:Contro%�Dela �ana1 L`�OS>"De#er`mination,, ��`��,��: ,:,,�. >�. � ,. � ��R„ . ,�' �. _ �.. _ . r� EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Adjusted Flow Rate, v 47 146 452 452 Lane Group Capacity, c 380 371 1951 2004 v/c Ratio, X 0.12 0.39 0.23 0.23 Total Green Ratio, g/C 0.23 0.23 0.63 0.63 Uniform Delay, d� 18.2 19.4 4.7 4.7 Progression Factor, PF 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Delay Calibration, k 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 Incremental Delay, d2 0.1 0.7 0.1 0.1 Initial Queue Delay, d3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Control Delay 18.3 20.1 4.8 4.8 Lane Group LOS 8 C A A Approach Delay 18.3 20.1 4.8 4.8 Approach LOS 8 C A A Intersection Delay 7.4 X= 0.28 Intersection LOS A c copynght v 2007 universlty of Flontla, All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.3 Generated: 9/21/2011 10:44 AM file://C:\Documents and Settings�rpergolizzi.GULFCOAST\Local Settings\Temp\s2k62.tmp 9/21/2011 ` Detailed Report , Page 1 of 1 � � ,, , . ,, HCS+ DETAILED REPORT Lffi" "£e".�tl�`Y � 'w., k �-5b ' u+ '.• - �Ge�eral lnforrriat�on .� �-- •��z u ,'��r�� ' ° �Si, . � �or��t on � �� " ' _ �-'�� a,�_� ,. . : . . �� i,�� Analyst RP Intersection MANDALAY/BAYMONT Agency or Co. GCC Area Type All other areas Date Performed 9/21/2011 Jurisdiction CLEARWATER Time Period PM PEAK Analysis Year FUTURE CONDITIONS ,.P _ . Project ID �oluh+e�a�a��T��r►��1 � n' u_ �. �..�� . . �:_ . :. �, ��. _��:. . . : .,_ °� : �:' . . �. � ;_ � � EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Number of Lanes, N� 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 2 0 Lane Group LTR LTR LTR LTR Volume, V(vph) 12 3 51 31 12 112 44 353 14 44 462 16 % Heavy Vehicles, %HV 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 Pretimed (P) or Actuated A) A A A A A A A A A A A A Start-up Lost Time, I� 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Extension of Effective Green, e 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival Type, AT 3 3 3 3 Unit Extension, UE 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Filterin /Meterin , I 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Initial Unmet Demand, Qb 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Ped / Bike / RTOR Volumes 172 0 15 54 0 11 112 0 0 33 0 0 Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Parking / Grade / Parking N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N Parking Maneuvers, Nm Buses Stopping, Na 0 0 0 0 Min. Time for Pedestrians, Gp 4.0 3.4 3.7 3.3 Phasing EW Perm 02 03 04 NS Perm 06 07 08 G= 14.0 G= G= G= G= 38.0 G= G= G= Timing Y= 4 Y= Y= Y= Y= 4 Y= Y= Y= Duration of Analysis, T= 0.25 C cle Length, C= 60.0 � �� '�`�'�"�' � �`@�fa�antl L�OS"Defermi/la�io/i. � �5 � ` � , ' , �ahe� Grov t Ca aci ,� Con�ro% ��,�,� . . v:: ..,�° � . _. �� . , . ;��.;, . . : � . , _ ._ ,.� : �. EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Adjusted Flow Rate, v 56 158 451 574 Lane Group Capacity, c 364 367 1935 �_ 1998 v/c Ratio, X 0.15 0.43 0.23 0.29 Total Green Ratio, g/C 0.23 0.23 0.63 0.63 Uniform Delay, d� 18.3 19.6 4.7 4.9 Progression Factor, PF 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Delay Calibration, k 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 Incremental Delay, dz 0.2 0.8 0,1 0.1 Initial Queue Delay, d3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Control Delay 18.5 20.4 4.8 5.0 Lane Group LOS 8 C A A Approach Delay 18.5 20.4 4.8 5.0 Approach LOS 8 C A A Intersection Delay 7,5 X� = 0.33 Intersection LOS A �opyngnt � zuui unroersiry ot rionaa, All Kfghts Reservetl HCS+TM Version 5.3 Generated: 9/21/2011 10:46 AM file://C:\Documents and Settings�rpergolizzi.GULFCOAST\Local Settings\Temp\s2k74.tmp 9/21/2011 Detailed Report . ,: . Page 1 of 1 � HCS+�" DETAILED REPORT ��* �^n�c�za.^"+�- :� �r °s��r�ww _wn�� v�, � � �;, � � ... a r� � � - � � � . s °a� ��. . . _ . __ , �a - �.Ge�eral;lnformat�an�`� a _ . , . ��;��i� �� '��. � : �Si�l��ormat�oC► . � :. � _.. � � ; v.�,=.��.4. `�� Analyst RP Intersection CORONADO/GULFVIEW Agency or Co. GCC Area Type All other areas Date Performed 9/21/2011 Jurisdiction CLEARWATER Time Period MIDDAY PEAK Analysis Year FUTURE CONDITlONS Project ID �V lum� and�Ti�in � �' � � v �� . . . � . �. ,_ , a �� a . EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Number of Lanes, N� 2 D 0 2 2 2 Lane Group L LR LT T R Volume, V(vph) 256 27 1 492 342 362 % Heavy Vehicles, %HV 2 2 2 2 2 2 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 Pretimed (P or Actuated (A A A A A A A Start-up Lost Time, I� 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Extension of Effective Green, e 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival Type, AT 3 3 3 3 3 Unit Extension, UE 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Filterin /Meterin , I 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Initial Unmet Demand, Qb 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Ped / Bike / RTOR Volumes 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 45 0 0 Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Parking / Grade / Parking N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N Parking Maneuvers, Nm Buses Stopping, Ne 0 0 0 0 0 Min. Time for Pedestrians, Gp 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.4 Phasing EB Only 02 03 04 NS Perm 06 07 08 G= 22.0 G= G= G= G= 30.0 G= G= G= Timing Y= 4 Y= Y= Y= Y= 4 Y= Y= Y= Duration of Analysis, T= 0.25 Cycle Length, C= 60.0 �Lane�Grou `,,.Ca aci �;;Co troLDe/a a5anal,"L05Deiermir`ia"fioni� .��z��_�`��,� $ P `� ��` �_�� . °�.s�._��' : .�. _ .. _., ,�: ,��. � EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Adjusted Flow Rate, v 264 28 508 353 373 Lane Group Capacity, c 1260 580 � 1693 1774 1402 v/c Ratio, X 0.21 0.05 0.30 0.20 0.27 Total Green Ratio, g/C 0.37 0.37 0.50 0.50 0.50 Uniform Delay, d� 13.0 12.3 8.8 8.3 8.7 Progression Factor, PF 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Delay Calibration, k 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 Incremental Delay, d2 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 Initial Queue Delay, d3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Control Delay 13.1 12.3 8.9 8.4 8.8 Lane Group LOS B B A A A Approach Delay 13.0 8.9 8.6 Approach LOS B A A Intersection Delay 9,5 X� = 0.26 Intersection LOS A Copyright � 2007 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.3 Generated: 9/21/2011 10:47 AM file://C:\Documents and Settings�rpergolizzi.GULFCOAST\Local Settings\Temp\s2k86.tmp 9/21/2011 De� iled Report Page 1 of 1 HCS+'" DETAILED REPORT �- �� ;��- . .� .„� � � . , � Ge,. ecal /nformat�on.. , :; .. , :S�te;;lnforma#�on �a � � '��° ��.��,:��``�� ,�� , � , . f. � ; �,� � �.,. � ti _ �. Analyst RP Intersection CORONADO/GULFVIEW Agency or Co. GCC Area Type All other areas Date PerFormed 9/22/2011 Jurisdiction CLEARWATER Time Period PM PEAK Analysis Year FUTURE CONDITIONS Project ID �� _ - .:� -� . � � � �Volume�antl��'r►n�� In"ii � . � � �r� _ � ��. _ � � � .� �. . � . , . : EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Number of Lanes, N� 2 D 0 2 2 2 Lane Group L LR LT T R Volume, V vph) 296 10 0 611 394 287 % Heavy Vehicles, %HV 2 2 2 2 2 2 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 Pretimed P) or Actuated (A) A A A A A A Start-up Lost Time, I� 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 E�ension of Effective Green, e 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival Type, AT 3 3 3 3 3 Unit Extension, UE 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Filterin /Meterin , I 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Initial Unmet Demand, Qb 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Ped / Bike / RTOR Volumes 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 45 0 0 Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Parking / Grade / Parking N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N Parking Maneuvers, Nm Buses Stopping, Ns 0 0 0 0 0 Min. Time for Pedestrians, GP 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.4 Phasing EB Only 02 03 04 NS Perm 06 07 08 G= 22.0 G= G= G= G= 30.0 G= G= G= Timing Y= 4 Y= Y= Y= Y= 4 Y= Y= Y= Duration of Analysis, T= 0.25 Cycle Length, C= 60.0 �L�'a e�'Grou"�Ca aci��'`�Contiol�Dela�'�`and, LWOS�Defe mination; � ' , „ :��..� � �� „� �� a .. � , EB WB , . NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Adjusted Flow Rate, v 318 11 657 424 309 Lane Group Capacity, c 1260 580 � 1774 1774 1402 v/c Ratio, X 0.25 0.02 0.37 0.24 0.22 Total Green Ratio, g/C 0.37 0.37 0.50 0.50 0.50 Uniform Delay, d� 13.3 12.1 9.2 8.5 8.4 Progression Factor, PF 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Delay Calibration, k 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 Incremental Delay, d2 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 Initial Queue Delay, d3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Control Delay 13.4 12.1 9.3 8.6 8.5 Lane Group LOS 8 8 A A A Approach Delay 13.3 9.3 8.6 Approach LOS g A A Intersection Delay g,g X� = 0.32 Intersection LOS A Copyright �O 2007 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.3 Generated: 9/21/2011 10:49 AM file://C:\Documents and Settings�rpergolizzi.GULFCOAST\Local Settings\Temp\s2k98.tmp 9/21/2011 Two-Way Stop Control r � � Page 1 of 1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY r _.. � _ ._, Genera( lnforma#�on � , �� f ^ S4te li��,orm�a#�o '� � �.��,, �.� . , ��. �. - � a_ � �� .�„�. ro �..�, , .� e . _ . , ._ �., � Analyst RP Intersection EAST SHORE/DRIVE B Agency/Co. GCC Jurisdiction CLEARWATER Date Performed 9/21/2011 Analysis Year FUTURE CONDITIONS Analysis Time Period MIDDAY PEAK Pro'ect Descri tion East/West Street: DRIVE B EXIT North/South Street: EAST SHORE DRIVE Intersection Orientation: North-South Stud Period hrs : 0.25 , .,x��c��alu e ,an,d A�d 'stmen ��""' � �� , � � � .��,`��. ��{J � � � . . .,� �, ,_�. _ . .., ..�, , , ,� a.. , ,�„�. b r � �.� Ma'or Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume veh/h 122 0 0 24 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 135 0 0 26 0 veh/h Percent Heavy Vehicies 0 -- -- 0 -- -- Median T e Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Confi uration TR LT U stream Si nal 0 0 Minor Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume veh/h 43 0 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.90 1.00 0.90 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 0 0 47 0 0 veh/h Percent Hea Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 Configuration LR `,fii'�"*,'� AI�r�T'�", ^�.Y .r-e-a5°" �.7°.1,t4'-�a7"i� "�w"'ri i�w N� t 4 ,�"i''�""�' `� ,� ' y .y.'m. � W a'""- °� �, 5 '. D"e a:Queue L"en th andELeyel of;.Service��;�'��'��;� �z��>,��"�� k �`�� .�� ! � ,a,s,r,,,a,c�.r�.N.a ..�.:, �„ ,zs � s',;�x aw,.?a a�r �. 3,- Approach Northbound Southbound Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration � LT LR v (veh/h) 0 47 C (m) (veh/h) 1462 835 v/c 0.00 0. 06 95% queue length 0.00 0.18 Control Delay (s/veh) 7.5 9.6 LOS A A Approach Delay (s/veh) -- -- 9.6 Approach LOS -- -- A Copyright O 2010 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS+rM Version 5.6 Generated: 9/21/2011 10:52 AM file://C:\Documents and Settings�rpergolizzi.GULFCOAST\Local Settings\Temp\u2k9C.tmp 9/21/2011 Two-Way Stop Control • 1 r Page 1 of 1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General�'n orma#ion� �.. �� ,�' �`�, ..� 3�n�� Si _�for ..:a#�on., ,�; � .: a �.��c 4}��_�i..- � .... ... ,.. =V.tw. �: T,..A.-a.o.w=._ c.�.. � _. ...=..o... ,. .0 :t.,vn.n.s�n �... F-+,�rn,e _� ... Analyst RP Intersection EAST SHORE/DRIVE B Agency/Co. GCC Jurisdiction CLEARWATER Date Performed 9/21/2011 Analysis Year FUTURE CONDITIONS Analysis Time Period PM PEAK Pro'ect Descri tion East/West Street: DRIVE B EXIT North/South Street: EAST SHORE DRIVE Intersection Orientation: North-South Stud Period hrs : 0.25 V�...icl"�. Yolume�.,TarLcl�.Ad"�strt�er�ts :� � � r: _ _ , . . � ro . �, _ Ma'or Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume veh/h 135 0 0 43 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 150 0 0 47 0 veh/h Percent Heav Vehicles 0 -- -- 0 -- -- Median T e Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 D 0 1 0 Confi uration TR LT U stream Si nal 0 0 Minor Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume veh/h 40 0 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.90 1.00 0.90 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 0 0 44 0 0 veh/h Percent Heav Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 Confi uration LR 1�'��r.�,„ a r��,�a�;. �,5, ^s, w, .�,.�.° a'�,= �. m,;.'�' z. .�xsm,...,, t�=, .'�. .'°'�r�5 a" r,k. k �"3 F�-��` s+*- � ;�+„�` � �"" ri�'� s ' �a r-- � Dela ��4ueue.Len �th :and Le�e�of�Servic��.� .,. �� ::m,�;.<,u� �- � ro fl,,��+ �.;� � � ��:�� '��.��,��..� r �+-5��;G�� ;�� . .: ,e krv.�w.� i ._,.�^ 2 �..x , �� . ._� , � .. �e�� .r .. , , _ .�v�„ v� :'F4��`t�„ � ,. . Approach Northbound Southbound Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LT LR v (veh/h) 0 44 C (m) (veh/h) 1444 796 v/c 0.00 0. 06 95% queue length 0.00 0.18 Control Delay (s/veh) 7.5 9.8 LOS A A Approach Delay (s/veh) -- -- g.8 Approach LOS -- -- q Copyright �O 2010 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS+rM Version 5.6 Generated: 9/21/2011 10:53 AM file://C:\Documents and Settings�rpergolizzi.GULFCOAST\Local Settings\Temp\u2kA0.tmp 9/21/2011 COPLEY DESIGN ASSOCIATES, INC. 1666 Laney Qrive - Palm Harbor • Florida • 34683 • Phone 727 787-2840 I�ANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE • SITE PLANNING PALM HARBOR, FLORIDA License # LA-Q001483 April 16, 2012 City of Clearwater Planning and Development Department P.O. Box 4748 Clearwater, FL 33758 RE: Couriyard by Marriott - Revision Responses Review Comments from Planrzing Review dated 04. 03.12 Response to item #34: Landscape Table has been revised on sheet L-1 MOHRSVILLE, PENNSYLVANIA License # LA-001396-R Res�onse to item #3 5: New base plan for ground floor has been provided by engineer and included on landscape and irrigation plans. Response to item #36: Engineer has modified base plan and is included on landscape and irrigation plans. Response to item #37: Silver Buttonwood tree spacing has been revised per comment. chitect COPLEY DESIGN ASSOCIATES Y W W IYYIYY►V Y�uqi'MIIY I�W Y� Y Y•�Y y��1yfu�Yl��Wrr illYlnl YrIfIILi� YWY�iI�YWW WYw.W�wrlYy W yWfy.. Y h IMYr 0 �� •nw1rY��IYI� ri�r r y�yy �I��IW� Y +W��M�y . �•r 1W�YY I�YI1W.,,,�+ WMWrMr+W�is1 �__�_ `,'"C"'�'1"L��': C�`i�".�» ."L��L'7�'� .�'c' `.wr:�r' uiiii w rr.. r.rrr � %i�'y nay� r rw � iMN ��..._. Plarrt Materiels Schedule � �i.. ar rnr+.. w..r �r+rW. �,.i,� tr i r IYw�Ir.W11r.r wrr�M�. u•sx >w. � m Ow��W�M� MvWrYY WY�M'M0.ifw. rrr s r IYiYMYY YIMYWW W1t�N'K�ww MIr� Y � W IYYIU CYIiY /Y 6L Y Yn� � W t� IY�� W WYi�Y 'YYYNY WY�H'W.��wa ��r � 1� 'rry+y YIIYI� IYY /i G4 �Y Ww �F Y1 Y Yf�� s w MF�Yii r�� Yyy�YiY K GL r ir� r pr r Wr rr �rr � M rwYr w r w�w.�wr 'w�� ww`r a W iw w.. r` a. +.. ]� W Or �IY� OYY �1I�� i'�Y Y� tlY W� 5✓ W � W m M1YIwY� w1Y !Y YYrM i� Y' LL� IYF W. KNwc.si"r� x'u r aw rrr.ww orr awarw..avq.. r.. � w wrr.rrr w+r�`r j~"ww..w^v. �s.. W.SYKrY"r. N'a� I MO iWI�11WY 1YLfrY 41�YY.�fY'. >IYw� . .r ..r....w�w �.r.r a w. ar r.. r- «. r a. ro " r�y++►W Wrr• aww•w..ww �w'u Y I[ W1��iYWr 1rYrwi iML1f4rM'M. d✓w w � wruw aw awarr..x�r. .w... r au rY rrrr el�rw rr. r s+. Y u. . w w. s/ ... • s rWU.r arr awalw.rrw �ru M1I�10� Y N Il�i� WYYW 11Y W 1 WL 1fY W � W YA Mf �a r � ��W �� Ip�fYWVq"� 4Y4 a� ur uw.r rwrr�. iwe�r..u�.r. w.a w v wrrr� rrr 'wiWY rr a. a w. �r w.. u� �r. ar u aic n�ut swt a uo aan w w+r arwr xaawm [ wra+ on uer �r Mc frtw �atr.LL �aaur wiau �nwm �e .r�ra .w. ..rn ..�� ,�..,r lro � � �. 0 � v C.� d. N Cry J �� i O� Zg y: �i °e [(� 2E �` W+ MJ � c, � rj°; �` V �I� � I v d � � � Q Q n' � � $ !, � � ' � � � w iU . J y? �'-,�5 :a ;_ :a :� a .� s r ii =� �i .� � 01!i.IC lo�i� [ 48 HOURS BEFORE YOU DI( "CALL SUNSHINE 1-800-432-477 GENERAL LANDSCAPE NOTES 1. All plmt materials shall be Florida �1 or better and installed to highest, nursery standarda Plants shall be healthy, free of pest and disease. 2. All plants shall be container grown except as noted on plan. 3. All palrns and trces shall have straight trunks with no twists, knotting or other defective characteristics. 4. Mulch shall be 100X Pine Bark, instolled to a minimum thickness of 3". 5. Sod shall be 95% weed free Bahia, installed w'ith tight joints 6. All dimensions shall be field checked by the Landscape Contractor prior to construction with any discrepancies reported to the Landscape Architect 7. All rnaterials shall be as specified on the plans. If materiols, labor or installation techniques do not adhere to the specifications, they will be rejected by the Landscape Architect with specified materials and instailation carried out by the Landscape Contractor at no additional cost 8. No substitutions of materials or changes to the drawings or specifications shall be made. 9. All required permits are to be provided by the installing contractor unless specifically stated otherwise in the specifications. 10. Contractor identification signs shall not be allowed on the project. 11. Contractor shall be responsible for all items as shown or described on this plan and specifications. 12 All proposed landscape and sod areas containing turf or weeds shall be treated with °Round-up" per manufacturer s specifications. 13. Landscape Contractor shall provide all necessary site preparation required to ready the site for planting as SPECiFIEd. 14. The landscape Contractor shall warranty and guorantee all materials and labor for a p�iod of 1 year for shrubs and groundcover, palms and trees. Warranty and guarantee period shall begin upon date of completion. 15. All repairs and/or replacements shall be made by the Landscape Contractor within 10 woricing days upon notification of any deficiencies by the owner or their representative. 16. All questions regording the Landscape Plans and Specifications shall be directed to the Landscape Architect at {727) 787-2840. FERI1UZAl10N Grour�dcovers, Shrubs and Trees All tr�es and shrubs shall have an application of 20-15-5 slow release fertilizer at time of planting and prior to installation of plant pit backfill. Fertlizer shall be placed uniformly around the root ball at a depth that is between the middle and bottom of the root ball. Follow manufacturers recommendations for application rates. 1REE PROIECiION/MAIN7ENANCE NOTES Prot�ctive barriers ond the use of other measures ta prevent tree damage (pesticide application, root pruning, intensive mulching to reduce soil compacting, et cetera) will be required as necessary. Any stadcing of soils, debris. construction materials, vehicles. and et cetera within the required barricades is strictly prohibited. Any tree losses incurred during construction may be subject to replacement penalties. Trees shall be trimmed by perForming proper pruning cuts to ANSI A300 standards prior to building permit. Trees shall be trimmed or pruned in such a manner so as not to alter their notural form, growth habit or character and sholl not be pruned into unnatural shapes, including circles, ovals, squares and other hard-edged geometric shapes. Not more than one-third of the tree canopy shall be trimrned or pruned in any yEar unless it is dead. Tree topping is not allowed under any circumstance. Hand clear existing vegetation to be rernoved under the canopies of existing trees prior to build'ng permit SOILS/PLANIING SOIL Contractor shall in�ect and test so1s prior to installation of plant materials to determine soil qual'�ty in regards to pH, drainage, nutrients and texture. Contractor shall modify existing soils to provide a growing media suitable for proper horticultural plant growta�. Additional sol arnendments, fertilization, pH adjustments, and proper drainage shall be provided prior to installation of any materials. IXO11C SPEqES REMOVAL All exotic species, i.e., brazilian pepper (schinus terebinthifolius), punk trees (melal�ca quinquenervia) and Chinese tallow (sopium sebiferum) must be remov�ed over the entire property ownership as a condition of site development. Where necessary due to their proximity to protected plant material, hand removal will be required. Should this removal be to a degree that a potential for erosion is created, the orea must be re-stabilized with suitable material. Plant Materials SchPdule Quant. Code Botanical Name TREES: 3 BN Bismarckia nobilis pure silver 8 CES Conocarpus erectus sericeus 3 SN Strelitzia nicolia 42 SP Sabal palmetto 9 VM Veitchia merrillii 6 WB Wodyetia bifurcata 27 WR Washingtonia robusta SHRUBS: Minimum 3 gal. container 110 ARB Schefflera arboricola 23 CA Crinum asiaticum 25 CAQ Crinum augustum 140 CEA Conocarpus erectus 52 COV Codiaeum variegatum 45 CU Coccoloba Uvifera 30 FAK Tripsacum floridanum 47 NO Neirum oleander 8 POM Podocorpus macrophyllus 173 RI Rhaphiolepis indiaa 95 RE Russelia equisetiformus 125 SB Spartina bakerii 10 ZFU Zamia furfuracea 9 ZP Zomia pumila GRO�INDCOVER: � 60 DT Dianella tasmanica 180 LAM Lantana spp. 312 LMG Liriope muscari 75 TJV Trachelospermum jasminoides Bare root trees are not acceptable. If balled and burlapped trees are installed, all non-biodegradeable wrappings will be removed and burlap will be folded down to enhance water absorption. If wire baskets are used in con junction with balled and burlapped trees, remove the first few rows of each basket at time of installation. Install rootball level with existing finish grade, 3-5" above finish grade on sites containing clay. Tree wrapping or pruning paint onto pruned branches shall not be acceptable. Test and Planting area must be a ° f/� • adjust soil pH minimum of 5� x 10' �� C��°,r._ to 5.5 to 6.5 without lime rock, asphalt or other deleterious materials. • Keep mulch 3° from tru n k 3" Mulch 3" Tree well— Finish arade� 0 Flexible •attochment to tree •12 gauge wire �12" length red plastic flag tape 2x4 pt stak '��':":.`� .-�- �`•��='•"=Kt `t Existin native Root ball �}�'°�''`��'=��' 9 _..�# :.x:4 = soil containerized - Prepare pit Native soil 18-24° wider backfill than rootball TREE PLANTING DETAIL Remove support attachments after one complete growing season Common Name Specification Silver Bismark Palm Silver Buttonwood Giant Bird of Paradise Cabbage Palm Veitchia Palm Foxtail Palm Washingtonia Palm Variegated Arboricola Crinum Lily Queen Emma Supreme Silver Buttonwood Croton Seagrape Dwarf Fakahatchee Grass Pink Oleander Podocarpus Indian Hawthorn firecracker Plant Cordgrass Cardboard Palm Coontie Flax Lily Gold Mound Lantana Emerald Goddess Variegated Conf. Jas. 14' C.T. 10' ht. x 4-5' spr., 2.5° cal. 10' ht. x 4-5' spr., 5 stems C.T. as shown on plan 1 Q' ht. x 4-5' spr., 3 stems C.T. as shown on plan C.T. as shown on plan 3 gal., 24" ht. x 24" spr. 15 gal., 36" ht. x 36" spr. 15 gal., 36" ht. x 36° spr. 3 gal., 24" ht. x 24" spr. 3 gal., 24" ht. x 24" spr. 3 gal., 24" ht. x 24" spr. 3 gal., 24" ht. x 24" spr. 10 gal., 6' ht. x 4' spr. 3 gal., 24" ht. x 24" spr. 3 gal., 16" ht. x 16" spr. 3 gal., 24" ht. x 24" spr. 3 gal., 24" ht. x 24" spr. 15 gal., 36" ht. x 36" spr. 10 gal., 24" ht. x 24" spr. 1 gal., 12° ht. x 12" spr. 1 gal., 12° ht. x 12" spr. 1 gal., 12° ht. x 12" spr. 3 gal., 12° ht. x 18° spr. Spacing as shown as shown as shown as shown as shown as shown as shown 30" o. c. as shown as shown 30" o. c. 30" o. c. 30" o. c. 30" o. c. as shown 30" o. c. 30" o.c. 30" o.c. 30" o.c. 30° o. c. 30" o. c. 18° o.c. 1 S" o. c. 18° o.c. 30" o. c. NOTE: THERE SHALL BE NO OBJECTS IN THE SIGHT TRIANGLE WHICH DO NOT MEET THE CITY'S VERTICAL HEIGHT CRITERIA BETWEEN 30 INCHES AND 8 FEET ABOVE GRADE «� �,. � •�€" �` y� , n�i�a '"�. at >�� x� � flo Z= �` C,P> '1J�: �-� .;. s�ZW�` � � �� _ ��o .<. �. ��go ° �'a�� ' ° � �t.. r ' S':�ii d o � O .� d _ N � ry 0 � � � � � a� � d O � � � � � � � �..� � � � � J ' \ o v� � � N � � � n� � N F+� ~ l ' � C �� L a F� . `./ " � O � v T^ � ..Vl:; � �ca v � o � � V` 0 � � H c� �_ W� A °- . r ' � > W� M--�i� a� �c m oJ co V � RO � , � - �,. ` � ° X , ,, : �, 4 f��mtT��` r � �-�. .�F4.�k�� ,�*. _ _ 9 �{ t , _: p t , `- � � q �� : �� `�� l��r ,'�� >� � � ��"�� t �>,�� ; �� ,��tj � �:� �;, �6�� Qado°o V'�o�d° .Q�g.� " � .� d�4� '° a _ , � N V ry � n o � o� _ � m � � N Q V Q � � O� J � � W � a � � � a � -J � U � j � ❑ � � � O � � � � � Q OM U� V z F--� � Z � '� a w H �� . W � F-/ F"� U w � �--� w U � � w '�a '� � ' V1 ' Q � � � � m a� c� Z� � O � J �� z zm w� a� a� U J cq � � 0 a� �o � J O� J � d �, c d U J JOB NO. I 1009 SHEET L-I -_ � GENERAL IRRIGATION NOTES 1. Repair ond ad just existing irrigation to provide 100% coverage of all existing landscape areas. Install a new automatic irrigation system to provide 1009� coverage of all proposed landscape areas. 2 Shrub risers shall only be used in hedges or mass plantings. Risers shall not extend more than 2" above the installed height of the plant. All risers shali be schedule 40 pipe, painted black. In no case shall shrub risers be installed adjacent to waikways, driveways or other areas where they may be damaged. 3. All heads installed in planting areas along walks, drives and parking lots shall be 12" pop—up fixed spray heads. All heads shall be installed with the top of the spray body flush with finish grade. All groundcover areas shall be iRigated with 12' pop—up fixed spray heads and extensions as required. 4. All sodded areos shal) be irrigated with 4� pop—up sproy heads or pop—up gear driven heads unless otherwise specified. 5. Pipe. valves and other irrigation equipment may be shown in drives, wolks or buildings for clarity only. Install all valves and other equipment in landscape beds for best accessibility and concealment. 6. Valves shall be installed in a manifold within a valve box of sufficient size to service all valves within the box. Valve box shall be firee from any debris which may cover valves. Provide a 3' depth gravel sump at the bottom of the volve pit. 7. All irrigation equipment and installation techniques shall meet federal, state and local codes, regulations and ordinances. 8. All gear driven heads and all heads along walks, curbs, drives and parking areas sholl be installed on flexible polyethylene swing j�ints. 9. Gear driven heads and fixed spray heads shall be installed on separate zones where possible. Precipitation rates and head type should be compatible within each zone. 10. Gear driven heads shall not be installed in shrub areas or be installed on risers where possible. 11. Controller shall be mounted as shown on plan 12. All sleeves shall be schedule 40 pipe installed a minimum of 14" below grade. Sleeves shall be used only to install lateral irrigation lines through. Sleeves shall not be used as a method to convey water through the system. 13. Adjust all heads to provide maximum coverage and efficiency and minimize overthrow. Irrigation heads shall not spray over walks, drives or any other non—irrigated areas. 14. Equipment shall be manufactured by, °Toro', °Rainbird° or °Hunter° or as otherwise stated on the plans. 15. Contractor shall field verify water source to deliver the proper pressure, pounds per square inch (PSI) and water flow, gallons per minute (GPM) as required by the irrigation system. Notify the Landscape Architect if there is any discrepancy. 16. All permits required for installation shall be provided by the contractor. 17. Refer to the Landscape Plans when locating all irrigation equipment. Allow ample room near irrigation equipment for the proper installation of trees, shrubs and other work shown on drawings to be installed. 18. All wires shall be installed in wire sleeves. 19. Contractor shall be responsible for all items on the plan and iRigation specification. 20. Contractor shall instruct the owner on the full operation and maintenance of the irrigation system. 21. Contractor shall be responsible for all final repairs or ad justments to provide proper coverage to all landscape areas. 22. All questions regarding Irrigation specifications shall be directed to the Landscape Architect at (727) 787-2840. IRRIGATI�N LEGEND Symbol Specification � 10F Rainbird 10' Radius Full Circle Sprayhead � 10'TQ Rainbird 10' Radius Three Quarter Circle � 10H Rainbird 10' Radius Half Circle Sprayhead � 10Q Rainbird 10' Radius Quarter Circle Sprayhead O��F Rainbird 15' Radius Full Circle Sprayhead O15TQ Rainbird 15' Radius Three Quarter Circle O�5H Rainbird 15' Radius Half Circle Sprayhead O15Q Rainbird 15� Radius Quarter Circle Sprayhead Q15EST Rainbird 15' Radius End Strip Sprayhead Q15SST Rainbird 15' Radius Side Strip Sprayhead Q15CST Rainbird 15' Radius Center Strip Sprayhead OI-25F Hunter I-25 Full Circle Gear Driven Head OI-25ADJ Hunter 1-25 Adj. Radius Gear Driven Head Water Source — separate irrigation water meter NETAFIM DRIP IRRIGATION 12" emitter spacing — 12° tech line spacing � Controller: dual programcontroller with bc back—up and and operational rain sensor �� Sch. 40 P.V.C. Main Line BEFORE YOU DIG "CALL SUNSHINE" 1- 800- 432-4770 PIPE SIZING CHART 0-5 GPM 6-10 GPM 11-15 GPM 16-25 GPM 26— 35 GPM 36-50 GPM 50+ GPM 1 /2" PVC PIPE 3/4" PVC PIPE 1" PVC PIPE 1 1 /4° PVC PIPE 1 1 /2" PVC PIPE 2" PVC PtPE 2 1 /2° PVC PIPE � � e � ; ��,� `-; � � , . . -" r�`^��'m �� . t. 1��tt! � � ,i. x�� E�� i � r� � � � � �' ' � _ C � �p � ��Zp,t� �t ��t:�. �ak � t.�� . � �t�- � g < 0 if # � '�� " t� �: ��3G �_ `, ., �l� �' ��` ,� oo=ii ; cf3 �k% �,,�r � +� � �, ', z o� z� C�.� .;#; "� � N' C �. � `, ,. uZw�< _.;, � � r� � � � g � °�: K� �rj �' '� ` i7'; r � ��' ' F -J oW ° �'e � ``f'��'� �� •i ,�K - p a .` � 0 6 d 0 � � � � � � � � � O � � � � _ .O � �h/� .� L L U� � � � N � m � �� N W '� �� c � O t a �. U� � O � � �� • ��° � � `o � LL . `./` 0 � 1--� `m �_ W E A� a � � > W� �� O �' � U `° � � . � � ,. �t' I:t �_ � � } � ., l � 6 4 Pi �'� "t ,q., + � a ;�� '� � ��k. � � V`�d o'g o�$� .� � 5 .� L m � � d�LL� '° d 0 _ , �NU � u � o� � 0 a,g�.� N�o �0 � O O L.L � � � a � � � a ^ J � U � � � 0 � � � � � � � � Q O� U� c� z � � � � I- � a w H l--�1 C/� w � � � U w � x � x � w a � V v1 A � � !� � m a� � z� Qo �o J Na Z� Z� W y a� m 0 J � � � � 0 a� a° � J 0 � J � d f/1 C � U J �t�� r��'� SHEET IR - I �=. �`F __ _ .:_ T� � .:_ _ . � _ '_ _ _ `. _ - - _ __ _ __ _ - �P�Fi�� , ��'._ _ wcwr ,,.. ��.;ii_i�._r��i- ; � ..,,�� 4. .:- . _ .. � .mFm � �-�^.`.c-..ex nbmra C.� r.. -.�,.,.�x,.� _.NA N U6°29 00 E.1 W.0' W) ]00.04� p1� �� ,._ - ��. . � � � . �. . IIL..%'_ �c. r. .. - �� y�i9 ' �Ip 4b �ql� ° �6i JI � �F�a"e �� q'i _ �, l�� d� � S4J' YINC PM fDR ��.: � '� �C� �- �I� [Yn'�SttY'MC�INI�S � ; i� ' � � � t',.., _ .. u _....._ . e-- � ____.._ .. .. _-_-_ _ ._ ... y .....__� .. .. � .. � .. e .,....6.. _.,,.... . . .. «_..___.. g, - _ a _. {4 .�. m. _ �. _ _ � m �. _ _ �. � �. _ m,. �. ,,. ... _ � . m. s. � �...... �.� ` .„..c gy YCNof�1Y'Itlw,�'�""� "� y .. CdNtrvE�9nNCW�D nMOP ��ARI4_�{.�\ 1 ��i�. L /w5 t NJL£5 5 I[N W:SI£ D£Pf. �� 7ffE /.V�:N ➢PP �, , NEw �a' (m/ 1' l7 xcw �' cawc. w i bG`B:Tfi�+s" u ' �v.ur cuxe'i`� " ��°ir"�sE"'� .___ � ... ..,., r „ �- i . N �6;d �d ,7;9; -� R ': �C .�+. -r- .. , . io atra� �� i . . _�..,�...�,. _ . a.:� �e..vi wrzv vis�u - '� .�• nauMUr FM.9 � � ' ulro• A �. � rouv�cro.e 4 . �' . .:,- .:�� pqpOF � ��' . ��. ` �cn c10r�u z "�� suwsrusus . �4. ..:.. Y.6� . . /�.) ... . .: — - � II'rS' LdIC. PAD !DR j' A IIESIAURAAT / 81R 1 � �fACI£ 1 � FSW S.f. ENIPY AS PER Cl/Y SP£pf]C,�lpNS 1-NKF RACK . ,. . P�ro u �r/uunur Im nr�.mnc � uw •x�xr na�ri axr vw• w ro uPPEP :iooxs � ' i 7 �' �� '' �� ' �' YIANUiY . _m_.Ew 1a....._..._... ��MNC. WAfK � ..... .. _ .m � �ti FOR� -�. . . ... .. . �wnr�row cavc. � -� 6,-,-,_- � Ny a O� tye.._ � ' �+1 � 5 � �� 6'-�' - '�i i�-- . _ rueix ewxur.wr. �:� _�_ .. � . � . __.._ �.. _ � .... . . _�,:: �::. ..:. �rs' us[r[wr ro rouow S 06°29'W" W 315. W' .. (PLAT LINE) . ...-.. ��rs' usnca� ro rouow �::� ..:: EN' IS' PI/BUC 1/NE Ol BMIIDWALM G2 1/N( Cr /q1IpWILK ACICEA - - - - - - - - �1.i�i��i��G� �L..11�� c5��s :5rra�s��r si...�_-.� °�'' °1 �m �� 50 SUP DOCK PREVIOUSLY APPROVED � N� xEt2lrm un �MTOKn er nr n pr ct � rtu dxr nuuno UNDER FLD1009-OY009 � � zs n zo � LEGEND � � e � W � �e�� NEW PIRKIN6 CIJUCE � � �� w CDNLREiE • . .. � � � � � 2 �_ NEW LONLRETE W tJt � � i LL Q pEW DECORATIYE �\+�+.. I-� � p i �VERS r "_g N01ES: t. PER LDL SELTION 5-911, EXISTING OVERHCAD UTILITIES NUST BE PLACED UNDERGROUND. 2. R MININIIN OF 8'-T' VERTICAL CLEARANCE SHALL EXIST fOR VAN ACCESSIBILITY PER AD� STANDARDS. 3. ALL OUTUOOR 11GHTING TO BE ATTACHED TO TXE BIIIIDING. 4. BOARDWALK TO BE CONSTRUCTED Oi RELYLLED WOOD SI1LM AS TREX �ND IINA� SELECTION Of SUCH SHALL BE SUBMRTED i0R REVIEW PRIOR TO ISSU�NCE Of ANY PERMRS. 5. ALL SIDEWALKS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTE� Oi WASNED SHELL FINISH TO MATCN TME NANDAIAY STREEfSC�PE DESIGN. 6. TME MINIMt1M LLFAP HEIGNT THROUGH011T THE GARAGE SHALL BE SEVEN fEET ZERO INCHES �ND SH�LL BE EIGH fEEf 7W0 INCNES FOR VAN-ACCESSIBLE NANDICAPPED PARKING SPALES INCLUDING INGRE55 AN� EGRE55 DRIVE AISlES TO TMESE SP�CES. (PER Cltt'S COMMUNRY DEVEIAPYEM CODE SECTION 3-1402. 1.1.) 7. ONE IN EVERY EIGXT ACCESSIBLE SPACES, BUT N0T LE55 THAN ONE, SMALL BE VAN �CLESSIBLE AND SNALL HAVE A VERTILAL CLEARANCE Of B' 2'. (FIDRIDA BUILDING C�DE CH�PTER 11, SECTION 11-I.1.2. (5) B.; SECTION 11-t.6.3.) 8. STRATEGICALL� INSTALL LONVEX MIRRDRS FOR �LL PARKING SPACES TMAT ARE ADJACENT TO A SHE�R W�LL. (PER CT"5 COMMUNI7Y DEVEIOPMENT CODE SECTION 3-1�02 A.) . .._..� .._. � � � , � , y � =_ � ��~w � �. 'e � o O • ` �o £ � z � 'u � s. o: K EB A5936 € � g � � � � �� ... \� \�// I q--�� ! 4A� � C W N � a O �. d O Q' � Z C N � Z g L ' O O d ��ix _ �= �°0°W N Qao�m V. �°oza SCALE: 1"=20' Z H 4 h Q Y C��q3 = N W � � Q � M W 2D D 10 2� b y L.% LL O U ..�.+""i�o mpi°'�'"'$�'�°m`wn.so C3.1 , LE�AL DESCRiPTI�N: LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOTS 8- 12, BLOCK C WITH RIPARIAN RIGHTS, TOGETHER WITH LOTS 10 & 1 1, BLOCK B, A RE-PLAT OF BLOCK "A" AND LOTS 1 TO 15 INCL. BLOCK B OF CLEARWATER BEACH PARK FIRST ADDITION, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 21 , PAGE(S) 21, PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA E TI N I P RAN E � � CITY OF CLEARWATER PINELLAS COUNTY FLORDIA � � � " # ��,:�.� �' ,, _ ,�,� � , _ � w; a �� uaa�t � ��Sf � �'�� "� � ��m� �,�'�� : � ` ��ra�y� ,� � �� , � � �� p�� , � f � e � r ° ° a. r ` �, •�� }� , �� . !'�� .; tR �. a y : „»+�, y . . �. �, � � �� , '�r � , � � � � ��. � � � '� � �. � � '' � � # �; � ��:��i±�� £ � `�#_ �' -� � z ��!3G�t �, ` t '� � r � ; �� ; �,t' i c �, �� , � •� � �s� � � � '� �� n � :� � _ � � � �"� I� �� ' �*� � , : � � z� � f � � .�,�.,�.� � f � z .�' � � �� „ � � � . ...E < �4 � .�.� �E� �'ii�l'R'[�i$= ,� �. � � >� �# � �� a� = ;: , � �. � ', * �. �M� v a � � � �i �� t r � s,, � � '�� =��,�'�i� �� ''"' �1#�F�1'�t's� 5 � � ' r �"� ,�e � II�� ! +'� �� - �� ,t�� t� Y � � �' � °�� ` �, �� .� � #�� . �� 4�� r ��. . � ��n� �'��'�' # 3 '��}i��l�"5 �.�4.t' ia+'$f �� k - _ � - �'%� � � �:_ � 41 z t� �` y � � �}4'� �,�t� ' � �i . * „ ��°!�� ' � y' � i �t "� � �� k � �� _ ,�� - � ,�'I fi' f � �: � � � �r��"'�s r � �� £� � �' � �� } � ��t � � � � . ` � �"''�`�*'�. ` , ,;: � �` �� ,:�� ; . , � � �"` .:� � , .��, ,, �'' _ �� .�� - { �� Nx . � � � , � � ��fF#�$�A�f � -� :�e r i� �,,,,F»x �, ��p,� �� t �a� � � > Y�k�� '� �. -$ � * : ��1N'J�'Ei � - � � � ,.� �:r. . � . � �.. a � �iG�Ck`�i 5� �i�� b � 41�. �.� �' y Y `S.,` - s :� � `�,- � � -. � ##@ s . x'4aR � t�. �. .£. �` , ,�,y, � '� t � �,y �_ �x . a� °.� ��a�` ��'� �r` � �e �� , ��'� � �'� � - �� ' ° �. ,� , - ,�, ,,�,,,, �+ ; � � ` � � ' �� ; � k - , � .. , � � ,� ' : �, ,�t�" �, ': - f.� � _ � �„ ,�j,: �; � -r Y.r,�. �.: x � t � ,.,, ' .; �. _:, a :. _ ., :<: --��.�^'*� :;�_ ,-ss '°" '�'i�'., �� -� �� ' � ±� '` " • �. :� �� , i , I �.e � � �r i � - � � �- � �' � � #�`�«r' �-.a�` , Y s � -r '" ° �, �-s, � �� a v' � x�� '� �.; �'r�v i 3 �,. E!�' � � u _ �"s,, a£ o � �t � ; � .� } , ' �,,� � � , ' � �.� ,� �''�5 's �§�'F a a �: -�. +i�{. fii A :1 . i y,. , . , ,... . .::, '� , v �- ?�`aw '� �a� - 5 . � ,� .��i „ �k.. � !,; , . `�` i y ., -., ,1 . �;': .' � " _ ' .:-� . . ::� ��3�' S �'. r€'�i' � P ` ^ -Yh'� } : .� .a.. � .�: k ,,.�. ._ .. ..�.. ,., .. ._. � . � '.. `,} ��' .,�e.��. .L .�'T9"'�,F-,�-"; , �: l'.,�"� .'�: ' `' . _ _ � �� y � �'.� � �`,°�-i` .� ` �.. s'- , +� . � � � � � •j �f � � � � h - �. J i. - , �.�. . � ..� �q .: J , �.. ar � ' �, �.a�A^.� " � ' �. � 3'$^� I a� ; � c � i< .. ) ° F � D' 4� , v ,��,��, , , �g �.! ; - .. . ^b.i�r_ _., � � �:� � , � S ._ �$ i . '_ :, � .� - :, . . ., . _ � � � ,. ",� , �. � �.. �� ..N�.. �� c �� .. . . � , - � � ..' �'k� � i l . � �.� 'fif.. ; ,. . � ' r . :: � ,4�F '. Y . ��: � �.� � � ..- � . � y �' r ` ' s � f .. ,. • � ; � , �, . y - � ;� �'�:± .� �- , „ t, w� _ , .x. � _ ':-�_, :&. F'a, s�. > >�. �� .... ...., .. . . _ ... .,, .... STREET MAP NORTH AERIAL MAP SITE DATA EXISTING (E) PROPOSED (P) REQUIRED HOTEL ACCESSORY PARKING LOT HOTEL ACCESSORY PARKING LOT HOTEL ACCESSORY PARKING LOT ZONING: EAST PARCEL WEST PARCEL EAST PARCEL WEST PARCEL EAST PARCEL WEST PARCEL T T T T T T RFH RFH RFH RFH RFH RFH LAND USE: OVERNIGHT ACCESSORY 30 UNITS 12 UNITS ACCOMODATIONS W/ ____ ____ USAGE: RESTAURANT (6,500 S.F.) PARKING LOT 134 UNITS 50 UPA 50 UPA DENSITY: 106.35 UPA ---- W/150 UNIT MAX W/150 UNIT MAX FROM POOL FROM POOL 43,415 S.F. 11,514 S.F. 43,415 S.F. 11,514 S.F. LOT AREA: 0.99 ACRES 0.26 ACRES ---- ---- TOTAL: 54,929 S.F. (1.26 ACRES) TOTAL: 54,929 S.F. (1.26 ACRES) BUILDING COVERAGE: 6,203 S.F. 5,744 S.F. 31,396 S.F. (72.3%) N/A ---- ---- {S.F. &% OF GROSS SITE) 14% 49% TOTAL: 31,396 S.F. (72.3%) GRiOSS FLOOR AREA (S.F.): F.A.R.: 6,203 S.F. 5,744 S.F. 31,396 S.F. N A 0.14 0.49 / ---- ---- 0.72 SETBACKS: NORTH: 4' 1.47' BLDG. 19' 5' 19' 5' SOUTH: 2� 0' 1.37' LOUVERS 8�.2'' 5' 5' 5' DECK 3' TRASH 6.3' EAST: g,g' 3� BLDG. 1 1.4' g.4' S' 5' LOUVERS 7.4 WEST: 2.6' 8 4' BLDG. 0' 5, 5' 5' GLASS AWNING 3 OVER P/L TRASH 13.5' 4 STORY ABOVE PARKING BLDG. HEIGHT: ONE STORY ONE STORY 70' TO ROOF DECK N�q g0' N/A 85 -6 MID PT TOWER ABOVE BFE PAVED VEHICULAR USE AREA: 386 S.F. 8,316 S.F. V.U.A. 1,722 S.F. --- N/A N/A � ) TOTAL: 8,702 S.F. IMPERVIOUS SURFACE RATIO: 12,429 S.F. 10,021 S.F. 37,748 S.F. 8,537 S.F. 86.9% 74.1 % (I.S.R.) 28� $$� TOTAL: 46,285 S.F. (84.2%) 0.95 0.95 OPEN SPACE: 30,986 S.F. 1,473 S.F. 5,667 S.F. 2,977 S.F. ° 25.9% (S.F. &% OF GROSS SITE) �2� 12� TOTAL/8,644 S.F. (15.7%) �•05 0.05 PARKING oLOT INTERIOR LANDSCAPING: ___ N�A 1,468o S.F. � 0% 10% (S.F. & / OF V.U.A.) 17.6/ PARKING: --- 168 UPPER LEVELS 24 SPACES TOTAL: 177 SPACES 9 GROUND FLOOR PARKING CALCULATIONS: TOTAL: 201 SPACES HOTEL: 1.2 SPACES PER UNIT = 134 UNITS X 1.2 = 161 SPACES RESTAURANT: NO ADDITIONAL SPACES REQUIRED PROVIDING USES DO NOT EXCEED 10% OF G.F.A. RESTAURANT: 6,500 S.F. = 6.7% OF G.F.A. (THEREFORE PARKING NOT REQUIRED FOR RESTAURANT) COMM. MARINA: 32 SLIPS C�D 1 SPACE PER 2 SLIPS = 16 SPACES (18 OF 50 SLIPS WILL BE DEDICATED TO THE HOTEL WITH NO ADDITIONAL PARKING REQUIRED.) TOTAL PARKING REQUIRED: 177 SPACES VERT/CAL DATUM /NFORMAT/ON: ELE�ATIONS SHOWN HEREON ARE BASED ON NORTH AMERICAN VERTICAL DATUM, (N.A.V.D.) OF 1988. FLDOD ZONE INFORMATION: COMMUNITY PANEL No.: 125096 FLOOD ZONE: ZONE AE (EL. 11) REVISED MAP DATE.� SEPTEMBER 03, 2003. SURVEY/NFORMATION: L.R, PENNY AND ASSOCIATES, INC. 10730 102ND AVENUE NORTH SEMINOLE, FLORIDA 33778 PHONE: (727) 398-4360 FAX: (727) 319-6051 LICENSED BUSINESS # 6539 LAUREN R. PENNY R.L.S.#4931 INDEXOF SHEETS C1.1 CIVIL SITE DATA C2.1 DEMOLITION SITE PLAN C3.1 STAKING SITE PLAN C3.2 DOCK PLAN C4.1 GRADING & DRAINAGE SITE PLAN C5.1 UTILITIES SITE PLAN C6.1 CIVIL SITE DETAILS C6.2 CIVIL SITE DETAILS C6.3 CIVIL SITE DETAILS � . � �i z M W s � °Z � � Z � c� 0 W � � ? . = 4a � OC Q y N W • Z �Z , � �� y a �- W � � W s��= � H M � 1 - ♦ � t�,� � Z z. �� • .,. 2 uN'� � W a � � �- y J . � � � y � LJ.� � � � � • W w z W � H J Z Q W � � z � � � � ♦ W OQ eM � a GC 0 z � W� Z o =O J � � �� y W z mW S • �a . � �� ,� a E B#5936 �� M � Issue Date: 10/01 /10 Revisions: � Q � W '"� � J � � V THIS DRAWING IS AN INSTRUMENT OF SERVICE b�,SWAL11fEM�4Iht fHE•PROPE'l2'f�Y OF THE ENGINEER, AND SHALL NOT 8E REPRODUCED, (��;5HEb 4pR` USED lt�, AIN� �GAY y�iTHOUT THE CONSENT OF THE ENGINEER. ti � _ G �3�+ ` N� �, �. �,� 4 1L'" tiK., i _ `� u�- �a � ,�� }� ,-o s��J !J' -� :,�r�. z' r� RRi� D. Hbt�S , P� . #1�48,�°' IVIA� �. _, �01� . z� �. ;.. .�., ., COPIES OF THESE PLANS�'A'fkE �1it�T�G.4L�D'..U�1�E�S. ;,�" ti� EMBOSSED WITH THE SIG�11L�1�� t�iP1EER'S S�AL :'�'y,'�` �. -��eiid�a�- .. "'@i ;. �� W � 0 � 0 � � � � � 0 � � � Q � � � � �C Q � � � � 0 �..� � � �' O � � � N � � 0 � O J �� _ � V �a W Nd �m O = W y Q a c�c W Q M W � t� ■ I r s � g � � s � N i� t O � � � y 1 � � �� y �. �� . �� n l,/ � !� � � � � � X� � �� x� - � � �� z�� t M t � �� iE �� • �' � � i �� # �� `� # i � �. � �, � � � �X � � � �± � � ! �c a� rn x �� -n r r 1� �-`t n E�. STC�R�i MH Ti�P CJ� RIM EL. = 4.23 18" CC)NC. PIFE �W EL. = 1.�8 �s° co�vc. �� s ��, _ �-a�7} �\ 'd>� ,�PAALT P,9 VEi��ENT ♦ � �' �� - �� 6t�' GI�T-�� A �' �'� — � �' ----- - � � a� _ 1' VALLEY c.�`tJR�3 � � ` 33 -�--- — _ - ��li.��•�ii�i�lSr��!l��i��l� ��i��• � [X. 12" IROM1i � `� � �, : WATER MATN �'� � /I 'W�}-�� 't ? � N 06°29'00" E 100.0' (P)100.04' (1Vn � � � " x�� .� i �� ' �� 6 10 � g I $$ �T"``T .�� _ ___L- ; �.� 16°aa x—�rL . -'� _ __-- � � _ ' � � LLLLL � � - �- � ' �' LLLLL LL � d� � p ._. :!. �: ' ,�2 LLLLLLLLL ''� ` � � � � -'„�LLLLL LL +-� LLLLLLLLL LLLLLLL L LOT 12 �' a LLLLLLLLL �1� �� 9 LL-LLLLL -e �.'� LLLLLLL 9 � � L LLLLLL BLOCI� B r' �� ° LL LLLLLL �� 5 �, LLL LLLL o � � ; LLLL LLLL rn� a �_LLLL LLLL LLLLL LLL r�� LLL� LLLL �'' p ` LLLLLLL LL �� '� `� � LLLLLL LL � r �'� LLLLLLd�L L � ' LLLLLLLL L ' a� ! LLL LLLL '. ' '_LLLLLI,�LL ❑ "' LLL�LLLLL ' �, '; _LLLLI��LL ❑ ° LL .�.TLLLLL 1_ � LLLL LL � LL'�I�L�L� ' ' x LLLLI� LL � � -- ... .. ;-{� ,.. o. vo . � � 2 0 � LL��LLLL R'� � '��1 LLLLL. LL � , ..' ._ : . , . �X LL LLLL '� �Y .. -. o .; . � LLLL LL N L�Lt� LLLL � _ . .. : .. : _: : , � ., : ��; LLLL� LLLL LLLLa� LLLL ' ` :° .�� LLLLIQ LLLL ' LLLL� LLLLL ;. : " � ;- Z�, LLLL� LL � � 7 LL� LLLL � �` ' c�1� LLLLL ILL � -� o°��. � � � LL� LLLLL" �9 �� : s-N; �LLLLL LL 'd�p � � a � � LLLL LLLLL ' ' � � M 1 :° , ' � � r" O -p _LLLLLLLLL ,p � � � z LLLL LLLLL � - �x LLLLLLLL ��_ �'" : � LLLLLLLL ' tt � � � r � �n LL LLLLLL � "° ; ' � LLLLLLL � :P ° ' LL L_LLLL � a+ ' I � � r�� LLL LLL 9,� �� '. � 9 LLL LLL � , �� t ": .=. � ' a LLL LLLL � �� LLLLL LLL � �, X LLLLLL LL ��, '.� LL�.L LLL � 's,� � LLLLLLL L �� _ .� � � :. � LLLL�L L ir� x 1 . - ~ " � .� LLLLLLLL �� i EX. ��1N i�IH V ��, LLLLLLLLL s�E� � °� LLLLLLLLL �/� '� TOP QF RIM EL. = 4.03 ■ j� � 8" CLAY I�IPE iV EL. =(-Q,9i) LLLLL __�� . .' LLLLLLL WOQ➢Sf�D Q � ONTiLIXAS .� `��i� \ � '9� : � � � �� N �.j O� ^ > ' �L �� Cy � - �. °�` '°� � : �a �-------------�s 3`�.��-�`�.�, r�r �Q " x � sz .�� so -S/L T FENCE x h � y '�s �s� s ,r�� 8" CLAY PIPE S E�. _ -1,17 ----� _- _--- ° -' ' ��:. �'= c��v. ( } -- � -�� . �a�s r�arrv 8'� CLAY PIPE E EL. = t3.15 0 � �r � F� � � GpS -- GaF — GPS --� GqS — WS — �AS — Gai — 4a� — GqS � G0.S —� 4a5 — GM5 �— GPS — GPS -- Gn5 — GaS — Gn1 — G0.5 �— GPi --- Gn5 — G45 -- fAS — Gn5 — CAS — Gn5 — GNS — G�5 — uA5 — G�S — WT — Gn3 — Gq$ — GqS — GPS — 4aS W—' 3— ��— CAS GP$ J�� AS � �— �q; �j. � � � �, � 8 6 8 I i �' � , � --- �� .�Q 10 s�� 10 Q 10 - � � �� qt : • , •• I� � ' • .• � � � _ '� .�.. Y ♦ � •i �I i � ' a 1 . , ' , � 4 • ' � i - .. � '. � • . s � s i � t • r` � , • , � � ' i � � � �� / ' � � I ♦ . , • � , ' ♦ � � • ' � � " ` . ` . . � V1 S ., 1. . � r .r • � R. .��' �� .�Ly' , \%, �< � � � * � « .a� ` !. .� � � ::.. ��/��/ ��/� � , ,. / ` � .,,/ /,��i�� , � r � � �� / �� / R ► �. /�. `S / • � �'I ( ,!.', �.� � � � � ' � � I% � � �` �'�� ,��II ' /�� /� :, ' F . �. �. .� �i. „� ;�,ali �. �. �. �. `,,: . �, �, �. �. �. �. �. �, r. �. �. � ��L � �. � - �. - �. � ' � ,/. _ - O. _ C!f � I� • . �� - `�? a S �� 7 � �� , �� w �� I i�-..�-r ♦ / -� f,_- � ♦ � / �ii, I I /� � � 1 �� ti _ � � .. . �✓I J�'�G.'rli.il:.I��.1i :G.;��I.✓� ✓i Ji I •o�tYi .7i ✓�_,i�-.�.LJ� EYISi`INCS I3RA�V--' "`^ -�--- -u�---. �� . TWIIV 7-4 ri F.I 1 �� ;� s� :� �- �j � ft �� ' ' � I zn � �� I� �� ` O�C ,� ,. � I �,� � � � O � � i, � .�� i�� • � � QUAD 4" t� t1 W � O 12" � � � � �' 1�� '� ^ �` - " �'d � �` � � ` , 7" ��.1� � . .,../ .i.�:`"� ► °��' - ;;;�'�!>> � - =: , ► - ,��y�,;,% � ; � ��rr/f .. 1 F � � � 13 � � 15" �" CLUSTER X �� z� WS "� (✓�i � _� GAS �— fi�8'�— � �� G1�6 �� WS _� W: � � � A R � � 6" CLUSTER 13 � � � �, � �, � "° � � I � �' � X °�' I � �� . ��'►� , � ,. �: � •.:, : , � _ „��-,,- �.,, � ".,, . : . � x �,3 w x s � - -sz S 06°29'00 ' W 315.00' (PLAT LINE) �� 10 m X � s,}�� x t� '�'s x� r� — X WS—GAS—GA6—WS--CAS—iaS—W:—W$— �y —�- DUMPSTER PADS � T � � i � � �;� �DC� o� r�.vE�rr � �o `�`� —* X * LJ v� •'�� "'D�a f51�' x x EDGE OF PAVEMF.NT � `� �'�' �(�1��'EME1VT Y � � ��6(�r�GG'�i(i � � ' �� G� - a ` � L L L L L L :� �� L: � i� �FIti P6 E� 4. 4} �l%L�.G`�LLLLLL �' LLLLLL �T - � � LLLLLL i -� �6 � r��L LLLLLL - �a LLLL � u 1� i.�1LL LLLL ��,� LL L,�LL ,. �N%-$" �. LLLLL .. W 2 LL L ° LLLL L � LLLL L 3�� LLLL LL ' _LLLL L �_ i LLLL LL : N� 14 -LLLLL � ��°:i LLL LL : '`� _�LLLLL i i 10 LLL LLL .: � Z,("�T 7 � _LLLLLL � �� . ! _LLLLLLLL - � i �3LC�C.K C �'� ��LLLLLL i �i �.,� 2 _LL LL�LLp. `'� LLI��LL � 3�a � LL LL � �' S/LT FENCE 4 O � L�L�L .y' �� 1 �� LL L� LL . ~�� L �� ► ii 8 . L L� LL ►� 2 L l- L a. � i�- --- ° L L Im L- Ci ' 1 : s: d. L L� � ii: ��. -. L L W L. '' � LL � ,� � � ` � ' �� LL L Q� �L :.iil ° 4. ' . ' .� LL ' L r ��- c_�- �� . a �p .: ., LLL��L � ►LCLL '�.�-� �� LLLLLL ° , 8 a .,`� ��„`. . : . ; LLLLLLL.. • LLLL •.: .. .: ''- a .... : :. O�o LLLL L � �' LLLLLLLI LLLLLLI�LLLL`�LLL U� °.-�� LL��. � ' � LLL.,� LLLLL 11 ' . • : L� �' LL LL�LLLLL LLL J;`.'�. =.�° LLLL .�w�=�,c�r�s�� " LLLL LL�LLLLLLL ' 3 ° LLL�- r oNSi�� ' �'� _LLLL LLLLLLLLL ;;; 10 �?.� � LLL ---X-��-,— � a� _LLLLIcL LLLLLL a � ��'X LLL ° - 16" _LLLL � 3 LLLLL.L : �'�'�( LLL LLLL�LLL LLLLL 6': ii LLLLLLLLL • 2 LLLLLIILLLLLL LL� i LLL LLLL = _ LLLLL�LLLLLLL L � ,I LLLLL L L�LL • �� ,.c LLLLL�LLLLLLLL � LLLLLLLL LLL � �v LLLL�LLLLLLLLLLL � LLLLLL L L< x'- t� LLLLLL . L LL LL N {D� L,I�L .• : � � , 4 LL $Z x � '��' L L C� ° .. ' • ,� '� � L � �c � _, o� i � � b . . � /� �t , � ' G � - • ,��'� " • " irp 5 � a . a, : a: " � - �,� �� . ° �� '�`� � � POOL ii -� � .. , �,: , '�'� i C u�` ' � 2° =.g X �'s -- _ - - _ - _ :r� �, � � `�, .�v-� ------ �`'� ��'v �� o °' $ `�m ��0 8 ��r� ,t.�'�QNC. 5EAW ALL �� a.� ir"�y x � �� X 4J �' � x � '�,r X � x 3 '`�s X TREE LEGEIVI� 12" pALM (SIZE) �Q UIVKNOWIV (SIZE) �� OAK (SIZE} �� BANYAN (.5'IZE) 12„ �� EVERGRE�iV (SIZE) LEGEND REMOVE: CONCREfE ASPH, dc BASE � �BUILDINGS DEMOLITION NOTES DEMOLITION OF THE SITE INCLUDES THE REMOVAL/RELOCATION OF ALL EXISTING STRUCTURES WITHIN PROJECT AREA, PAVING AND BASE, UTILITY LINES (SANITARY SEWER, STORM PIPES, WATER LINES, POWER POLES, OVERHEAD AND UNDERGROUND POWER AND TELEPHONE CABLES, GAS LINES, TREES, SHRUBS, ETC.) AND IS NOT LIMITED TO WHAT'S SHOWN. � REMOVE EXISTING ASPHALT & BASE 2� REMOVE EXISTING CONCRETE 3� REMOVE EXISTING BUILDINGS AND OVERHANGS 4� REMOVE EXISTING DUMPSTER AND DUMP 5� REMOVE EXISTING POOL � REMOVE EXISTING CONCRETE WALL �REMOVE EXISTING OVER HEAD WIRES AND POWER POLES. 8❑ REMOVE EXISTING CURB 9❑ REMOVE EXISTING BRICK WALKWAY 10 REMOVE EXISTING LANDSCAPING 11 REMOVE EXISTING CONCRETE BOLLARDS 12 REMOVE EXISTING WATER METER 13 CONTRACTOR TO REMOVE/RELOCATE EXISTING GAS LINE � REMOVE EXISTING TREES 14 ALL CAVIIY & EXCAVATION RESULTING FROM REMOVAL OF TREES, SHRUBS, PIPES, INLETS, GREASE TRAPS, SIGN, AND POLE BASE SHALL,BE FILLED WITH APPROVED SUITABLE MATERIAL AND COMPACTED IN 12° LIFfS TO 95% OF MAX DENSITY. 15 OFF—SITE DISPOSAL OF STRUCTURES, UTILITIES AND C O N S T R U C T I O N D E B R I S S H A L L O C C U R I N S O L I D W A S T E DISPOSAL FACILITIES APPROVED BY F.D.E.P., AND PINELLAS COUNTY. SCALE: 1 "= 20' 20 0 10 2 � 40 : • O o Z � Ha Z CO � O � � K � Z H ` Q� �w ♦ Z �? � � v a � W � � � g� N� � ti M � ' - ♦ O � � � z � �� Z � Z • ti 2 O `': oC Z �' F- � J . � � � � ' y J W O � � � W � � W t� z W c� � J Z Q W W W �a � � �ti • W OM � a �0 z � _� � O g °� v LL � y W z m� W g • �a ♦ � y� J � O W E B#5936 �� M � Issue Date: 10/01 /10 Revisions: No. Date Description ^ Z � a W � � Z O � �..� 0 � W � t � ,� . THIS DRAWING IS AN INSTRUMENT OF SERVICE``AND SF�F,C�,, REMAIN T'HE .:PI�O�?N �OF THE ENGINEER, AND SHALL NOT BE REPRODUCED, PU8�S1t1ED`AR. F/SED' !N •At�(Y WA`��yi�FIOUT THE CONSENT OF THE ENGINEER. ��(��ORYR}GFi� �tlD9 NOT. Pt,�fLISHED � , �. � � �.r � �'_' ' � 3 - -.�i :• �Na t A �' ,`� �' ~_ ��f ""' ' -� x - LARRY D. HOU$C��14836 . �� .:� ��,. � <,� ..s ��' � �.. COPIES OF THESE PLANS'`Af�E .hCQT. V�1� UNLES�� v-� � EMBOSSED WITH THE SIGNIN�;'FeK1G1PJ�ERfS `S�L�� . �; ,o` �=,�, - _ ,� Ey,/��/1f/1Jlt.►�L��` r. �� ek:�: � � ... ��"�.k. e.,� ;_ � T �� W � O � 0 � `./ � � O � � �O O ao 0 �� N O � >;�` 0°0� � a ��m a o O �C � o yF�- 1— N � a � � a c�c .� N W Q O W c.� �� ■ rCi; X _i�,�p j t j; i ' �_,�� ly �yl4p '`' �,(J� I � iI `" �i � i � 'I �� j `w �.< � � 1 4 �,. ' .' 11 � �'_ � ��I � I - �; I �`��I �i � ` `� � �', �� i ,' III �% 1� fl � I. ��1 �� i � �i � M"� � i �, '� � � �� '�� ri '�� I� � `I I � � �i � � � � `� . � �� az � � � W �'� }6 1 G� :, �; � �� .� �'�. y; y � � � � O � �, ��'i 'iy ', � 'j 4' X ,��, I.�''= , �, ;;_ � j� � ��. �T��C� I�lF� �� T�}P i�F FtI�1 E�. - �.2 � 18" ��f��, F'I�E t�� L. W l.t�� - -__- ��EF i..�€`t4; !'3t�� J �€... _"' �.-lJ.�� I i _'—'.__ "�_ ____—'_ . —__ . -___ — _-_"_'—__'.___--�-�._-__--_-- —'—_-"__'._ ---' __—__— -- . .. . __ _ _-'_ --� �� ,�6 � F3C7:1 ! �' 7J�& (i ii lirfY771."C' � NEW 5' fi�� Cr��=�.�° �'f� � CONC. WALK � ---- -- - ------ — -- - — - � ----- — I i+�I I � �' t: E T�� I3 �r��r��rs�:��:�;��_��:�•��"��..��.�:��i€'�rt-i�s�r�,��.�ir'°r�-��', ■ EX. :ii" Ff?C11'd .��., - .�� t%ilA (��Ft Es�Rii3 � ' I � .��: � ��} N 06°29'00" E j100.0' (P)100.04' (M) ,,�� } � � � � T � � �n 5' LS BUFFER REQD =� _ _ , � : � ; �,- � � - � 3 . - -- >,' �� . �� - 3S6 SF r ' � \` 294 SF. F- .' ` ..�_ L .' � . �ti . . [e , . , � Y � , t.. �..i .. \ . ra , , , �1�� , � �� _ ' a' � S t G E �' � .��i �.!<: F ua �µ ;.. � I��C3€'I� � r.� � �,', ' ' _ ' ' x , � � � , ; = �;., e� � � � ,�� t � { ,; � � t �-� � � � � I � : i i G � ��_ �_„�. .v r �� ;;�. - Eq � �� [C � � y , � � k5�� - i 5 Y � ��i:/� � �• � o � , � '� � �°�� tJ� � - �_3 -� = � � _ µ � � � Y ��' (�y � � �� 4 i J � � .' � I ��" f r "i' s `� '- � � � — — � � } � � �� — � � vm, '� ' ` �` � � '' _ �' �- '' p � �,, �h` r + �. �,:�.�. �/� ;� � � �� -�V' . i �fi4 � �� _ Ct��,. �.% � �� '' — � � � — �� , 5' , � : .. � . . . �w� : . � - �.? - �-�� ; � � �� 1 � � "� � �'� � o � � � � � � � �. s � � 'a � J�� . v' � �� N �] I �� { � 5'1�-� �� '�j � � � i`E � � °° � - r � r� � . � � � � �' ° ' tt ��- � �� ' ' ;� -g �� #�'� �#'�t,�€�iF.lt�� ' -� '..�� ti �` 3 x3 CONC. PAD FOR �r � � � � � _ , ,� � � � : �� _ � � � � � ,� � y (1) TRASH RECEPTACLE '� � �.p T�i'#��` �� :� ' , �� ' � � t► � k,' � � ' � �, AS PER CITY SPECIF/CATIONS = .: . i � � , E7E �� -��1�� ' � _� � � �+� � � � �`�� ' � 4 ` 1 , �� I � �� ' � �� ;�. ��1 P'f!� v ��" 7 �� ; � : ,' �: 20'X20' V/SlBItITY , `� � I �C�P t�F FtTf� tL. == �.�3� --� �,� � ; � � � „ A � 5' .tS BUFFER . , _ s : , � �r � � �� .� � . � � 5..' L FFER :- ' ,v��« � ��8 �L.�`Y F�IP� C�1 EL. � �°G.97) �� . REQQ.` � -� . �QD: - � ,�,��L_,.,.s � } � . � � � � �� ; � � NEW TRUNCA TED DOMES , ;, �� x. � «��.�. �f� CL�'� f�IF�E � EL. = (-�..17} ''�., . .3s2 .�F : . _ 3a_sF EARWATER , _ - _--- - �I---'� � c., , �. , ___ _ �.. __ _— __ -._., . ___. � -- -- -- �_.. _ --- �� r�a�e� �" (:,L.AY PI�'E E EL. = 0.1 S \ o r ri � � , ' �� ..k, �n. 4a., .,.�5 us� w� , �n,l 6�,.: Gu.. Yro +,M1S _ _ \ PER CITY OF CL _., �t. r_ ��.� . ��_ -- �, -- „AS __ �r.; - s�� -- ��,s -- �,; -- �� --- �, ._ __ ,.�: _ �WS - ��: -- �., � �_ - �:s -- �<-- �. - �.�. - �A, _ �s- ��,--- �A - � - �. �,� ---- --- - � �_ � . _--- � # � r ,. ,, - �--0=�-��-QQ , -1��Ar �'.� - �- -- as -- �a, -- ��, �E : - - � � - �� YU�. - - � ;: � _� � � �� , 1 � � ` - ��. ` � �� -,,,, NEW 1 D' } � � ; -�--------- ----- - -- - — '� � � ' ' � � ��: °o°o°o°� ' � ' o°o°o°o° �,�� CONC. WALK �, �' � . � 000000° � ' °000000 � " `` =,�,a''� � �.� =; ; . � . , . �y �; � � _� � � � � � � � � � � � � � ..� �. �.. � � o � �go - � � �:, � � .� � � '� � - -- -� _ � -- --_ _ - - -- --_ -- � - — -- --- --- __ _ _ . ---- _----- __----- - ---- .. fl �o�oo �od � �a.� . �, � _ f =��, � a� _ : : o ; o � ° . . a, � . . ry , :, � �. , . . ----- --- --- ----- 20 z3 C C PAD FOR ;�c;� c�f� ��v�,cv��.r�`r-- ------- _ ._ . _...--- _ ___ _ _. -- - -_., � ��[, � s�� ti{�tv4Fh�'� NEW 1 OT ' - �;�fU !` Qii � � � � DECORATIVE SW/NG �ATE WITH DROP y .�.5�>�t-�t�.��-�� '�. � r`€�� A�� i�'d ��_. w�� --'� % ��, °�� PINS & HOLES AS P�R ,SOL/D WASTE DEPT. PER CIT�Y OF CL� RWATf CONC. WALK 2-3'x5' BENCHES AND F � . , � ,� � , �, --- -- ------- -- - -- a-- `��- - ------- ----------- - - ---- ---- --------------- R -- - 1- TRASH RECEPTACLE �' Cu��'�'� �- k �� €�. = ? .�>�� f � ..� SEE ARCH PLANS - ---------- � � j ! � � = � �, INDEX # 109 �YP. j---� ��-�� AS PER CITY SPEC/FICA TIONS " ' C �"' � � �°t -- t i� Ca�3 � � � ; �<_... , , r� �:��'� �. � �� . _. __ 1.._ , � � , U � NEW 1 D � �„ �� i � i � NEW 2 :, E � CONC. WALK NEW DO NOT ENTER �D' �i�CX.�� i�? � y VALLY CURB ��,�,� ONE WAY ONLY S/GN �`' ��:i � ;� � . � � <' ( � �.,' L., r-�� , • k . . � - .. W �. � E:�. �i'' [i.G. -r � , ,.. �r� , .. � t . . . . . . ... .. _... . r, ,..� ,,� P _ . . _ ,-.. : . :� � .� � .�.. ... �'� �: �.�:,, ^ ° " . �- - -J � �._,. .: -.. , :; � r . .., _,,. ... +wi� c�'� m.�.�..' �� l.��.:� a .� ,�.p �-r � .�.�� . ...uu'nue 'F�`,,-- _ L�, . � �Ct : _.____.__. _ . ._.__.___._ _ . p; ., -.. O ..... . _,�. � , O O : O O . -- . O O � . � ... �. - : . �w . .. .. . ... �: tWw . o . � � r-.:.�•� � � � : � � �. � .. : -, �.. .._� �� 4�� 1 � 1 , _, _ , o � o 0 0 . . , . : . ._ , . . , .., :. o 0 1 . . , oe;g, _ .�� . .. . �.. �. .�. � �:.:.� � � � � :a -�-�:.� �'� � � ._ ..�� :�.� �, �. � � . 4i Rs uo 0 0 .: . .: . . . ,. . . : O " . ,;. o 0 0 ,, o ;. _ , � o o'� � .�. ; _. , °� ,�� , n i � a s o . ,:-. z , ; ,:; ,. y .. . ...,�, . ..',`: .� ,. , . . � ,. �� $� ..., _„ `+�`� w� � �t � �. . � : o o . . : ,: ; , , r' . . ,,. . �, ` _ ,�f ,... .` .� �; � .. ' . :' o o � � :: o 0 0 l� o 0 0 , r t o o . . .�, , � � . , � N �.1� �.Ee ?J . ..., �. - .: . ., . •. `,. <.pp C9 � � C.?�- t,�E �.�� .�: �.,�..x . . ., .., : � o 0 0 0 0 0 , o 0 0 o R:� , I t1 , o 0 0 � ... ;_ ; �� . ��B �'!�.�ft, Yrt.�r� 'ir_,yrttrPf �.nr iea �a ea,tre rw�-� �: :. - `�, t' ' • ' .,.; . � � = o o , o 0 0. '"' O � � o 0 0 .. . o , , , STRUCTURAL GLASS AW ING .� : ,. o 0 0 0 0 0 . : , . .., : .. _ �. . � . .. . ,.: . . . _ r�& s� � � �; Mir, rr �s �. O i er�. � +li� lr �� r� a�. � ' o � � o 0 0 0 r 0 0 � o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 l -, �� ,� ti O h�. I I� �{ o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o W 4' �L _,_ 3' OVER P L t . �.��' �r� �[.,. '�,€��,' � s # _��i�'.. �.. � - � .,; ..,. `� _ ,. _ _ . � . , • � ., ,> ,. _ , �, . �. o � . � 1�" t�.Cl{'�C:. �°I�� . -� �-�� '°' ��.r::= ::. ,� ` _ D S�jTBA K ---- --------- - ¢ - - - - � tio � � � a � � �- M �T 6 ��- « � �5.00 �� -�Q ,�o' SETBACK � ? � i', ^� � � -- � �• ..� --- � � � � � � � �„ � � < ro;�� u? , � �; - ------$e--- � � , p, . �r° � � 19' I �.r' � N .� ., M �.� j " " .— . ., . . . . ,� < / �— a. • �,� � -- _— � �. � ---- f�� » I I ' �:,��. ��.�. // �. ' . � ' � — — NEW TOP BAR '-� � % ti < kr� �•'- r��a, ,,,�,�, & STOP SIGN W/CAUTION PED CROSS/NG '" ��`�` 9,3 1' s '✓ T� ... F�CORAL STONE TWO ------ �x � � � Cp 'i�> ��.SIDED WATER FALL �'�.i �%��TT �� i yr� _ � � _ . � � tiy � F-Yy�< <.{ . ^,.� ,�a, > �,r ,,�, a`,'� ^, � o W „ T RN ONL Y SIGN» � � . , , �NE RIGHT U FIRE ° ; �� • _ . : �,� � ,'�;� � TRASH � " ° � � - �: � _ 'r', .� �� oo° �' �„ UMP ROOA� 2 � .2' i�% � ,; ` � .1 STAG/NG� ' �, � �� ; . /J - .J ,: � . ,. ,,.. � i �'�.• ry - .. .• � : ; - � ;c� . _ � � �"' � �, � � �° � -'� � � �� ' °� ° �c o �'` � : �,� ;.�, ,,� �, y i r � � ;,<- -� .r?1 �D X�D �` �(Sl�lL;7TY -v .�, �r I, �� :� � >> , , �' R.� hfF = ;��, � - i :-� , � � ��o , ��o - �� zo x2o vrs�e�ctrr _ 11 TR%ANGC�: :�YP.LL dfl�Q dQ�Ja ` TRl NG � •►� 6.3 RAMP TO �. � � , •. o ° ` . � < . t� �, �, / �� ,�-�` ; -- , A LE (TYl? )� UPPER FLODRS 4J .;� ' � �, , � I ; ; • " r . � r, �"� '� . �: 22'x 1 D' ; I I .` : . . - � � � (�: '� ,.�'`. COMPACTOR l�'/��. f � o � Q A;�� I�� '-Ejr NO ROOF �-_ � ;%� �� F�� ` � � NEW 10' ��` ; LOUVERS _ � �' '� � �z ° � � ��' �- " � . � �__ SUNSHADES , � � N ��-�� . CONC � 11iALK , .. .. � ; . : (TYP.) � p � �. I�, � � �. � . . - o � i a � y� a r�ri �� , J, �__ � � �.z ,� �: u : ; . , . .a a , ,. . ... . i F. . .. . . . ��• �: . . , . _ . ... �� . � z . . . . - " o O . . � ,. �... �_ � ' ' ". {j / _ ' ' __'.—."'_ � . , i ' � o .. ' , .. , 3 . . � . . � � . /'� A A ..,� m {f I�i % I (`'. �. I - � . „ . . . . , a _ 1 xApA ,1.. ,� % � � � � � ' Z � l� I' /' � �; .�.��. i , . � . . . � D , O '� � ` �'� 7.9' � ` ' � jj �._ �• _ �:Z�� ''IIf� � .i,[; '�.. IL- , ' ' �>'` Q �ll�. ! O"� 2�..5� . `� j� � `� ' .. . v � ri, �. �. � � rn � ��. A 1 1'x3' CONC. PAD FOR � `�� } r' .#° _ RESTAURANT / BAR �z�n � 1-3'x5' BENCH � y'4,�'�r; �.' � 6, 500 S. F. HOTEL i 8�� - 3a> a s'; A N 1-TRASH RECEPTACLE '� ��.,;, � .,,1- 9,g AS PER CITY SPEC/FICA T/ONS ��'�`��r�'�1� {� '��` y; ENTRY t �; A� �;7� 1� � WOOD; 1-BIKE RACK ' ,ue„, � �- ::�� ..�'.�":: PATID; � � A�� I � ! � � 5 ��..Y ,{, ; , ..! � - ��(( �j Z�.A< � ,:� : �F6 XlV _ �J .N a�� m �I ��;> ,i�, .�`� � s 2 `C �� j " o GATE ��` �` � ' � �, r � LDUVERS SUNSHADES ELEV. ELEV. � "J�� r"� i ',,: � � �.. � . � . . a :. : 37.7' r x�� r��, �, :- 3' 21.1 ". �TYP.� oNE rwo �__�z:�� T��; r��°� - ,: � � i � ^�/// N �j//i N � 15' EASEMENT TD FOLLOW S O6°�9'OO" W 315.00' (PLAT LINE) NEW 15' PUBL/C LINE OF BOARDWALK ACCESS - �a�c�a �oa� Q�� a�� o�D DES/GN OF PROPOSED BOARDWALK TD BE REVEWED AND APPROVED BY THE CITY OF CLEARWATER ONCE FINAL/ZED � � � PUBLIC BOARDWALK GA rE 50 SLIP DOCK PREVIDUSLY APPROVED UNDER FLD2009-02009 l 4''f ) ■ l Ll7 l � 1 J tiI?C.'sE t 1� PA�,� E:tiI�3?'�'i �rr�r�t��r� � � NEW 1 D , , CONC. WALK r r� ti- C� -- �� . N� �� O . � o �, 0 �--�,4 vt��.. �"`� � l�Ei�Cf.:; n � � � ,� C� �A �'i:': =��$ � F� � r� i��= i � x! 'J ', �p �� , r , : � � � r� � \ . .. . -�=, J, �"` ''!!r _, - 1� --- -__� �� •i vVtTk)�� 5iii'l� ; r� �� :�_ . P' �. �, � � - r�. «� w r. �: � It1� % ZiLFJ['Ii t ` � 15' EASEMENT l0 FOLLOW ` '� � `��'�`� :i E==�13%AL':_ LINE OF BOARDWALK 2� 0 0 LEGEND NEW PARKING GARAGE ; j CONCRETE ` -� -��- �---- � � � NEW CONCRETE WALK � � - NEW DECORATIVE a�� ';;; ," � `;`f,�;T<? <�< PAVERS�� ,�` `� � ` No rES: 1. PER CDC SECTION 3-91 1, EXISTING OVERHEAD UTILITIES MUST BE PLACED UNDERGROUND. 2. A MINIMUM OF 8'-2" VERTICAL CLEARANCE SHALL EXIST FOR VAN ACCESSIBILITY PER ADA STANDARDS. I3. ALL OUTDOOR LIGHTING TO BE ATTACHED TO THE BUILDING. 4. BOARDWALK TO BE CONSTRUCTED OF RECYCLED WOOD SUCH AS TREX AND FINAL SELECTION OF SUCH SHALL BE SUBMITTED FOR REVIEW PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF ANY PERMITS. 5. ALL SIDEWALKS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED OF WASHED SHELL FINISH TO MATCH THE MANDALAY STREETSCAPE DESIGN. 6. THE MINIMUM CLEAR HEIGHT THROUGHOUT THE GARAGE SHALL BE SEVEN FEET ZERO INCHES AND SHALL BE EIGHT FEET TWO INCHES FOR VAN—ACCESSIBLE HANDICAPPED PARKING SPACES INCLUDING INGRESS AND EGRESS DRIVE AISLES TO THESE SPACES. (PER CITY'S COMMUNITY D E V E L O P M E N T C O D E S E C T I O N 3— 1 4 0 2. 1. 1.) 7. ONE IN EVERY EIGHT ACCESSIBLE SPACES, BUT NOT LESS THAN ONE, SHALL BE VAN ACCESSIBLE AND SHALL HAVE A VERTICAL CLEARANCE OF 8' 2". (FLORIDA BUILDING CODE CHAPTER 1 1, SECTION 1 1-4.1 .2. (5) B.; SECTION 1 1-4.6.3.) 8. STRATEGICALLY INSTALL CONVEX MIRRORS FOR ALL PARKING SPACES THAT ARE ADJACENT TO A SHEAR WALL. (PER CITY'S COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE SECTION 3-1402 A.) / � _ �' 7 "�`''`� PRE.fUI (.SI.�'�� '� �� crr��c�c�c��v (srz�} s �� tK (�.��) �z ` � ._,. � ` ��ftfY�1V ("�1`�E} sz ��'w� ��''��`� E4'�RGRE�N (SIrE} SCA�E: 1 "=20' 20 0 10 2 � 40 �, M W o � Z ��Z �z O � H � ` Q� ; w . Z �Z • Z yQ tiW Q 0 � S � N H � � h M � ' - Z O � Z t9 � ''� (�' = N � • z • ti 2 N � � Z ~ ~ • � Q • � � J W � � � O a W�/ i� � W C.� Z W � H J Z Q W � ° z � C � � • W OM � a GC 0 z � W� Z o =O g y J� z W IL w s . �Q � • � �p � �� a E B#5936 �� M � Issue Date: 10/01/10 Revisions: No, Date Descri tion � 4/12/12 Per DRC � 4/30/12 Per CITY Z � � W F�— — � � Z � Q � � THIS DRAWING IS AN WSTRUMENT OF SERVICE AND,,`�HALL.REk1AIN THf, Pf�OP RTY OF THE ENGINEER, AND SHALL NOT BE REPRODUCED, P�LISH€D;1}R'US�•Ity`ANY ��,Y WITHOUT THE CONSENT OF THE ENGINEER. `°� ,�`��YklG+'IT "2009'd�IOT,�Pl1BLISHED -` �Y �� ,�� '• - � � -�"� �� ?� �-. u►R r D. HOl9��L, P��aas�� j�Y.= �: 5 2012 COPIES OF THESE PLANS'iAR��'NOT �/ LID UNL.E� �' •`� EMBOSSED WITH THE SIGP�ING,J�RY�IN�€I�'S�SS`EY�L•� �,� . . /�f��p+ate:ag►sL;�` � � �� W � � � 0 � � � � O � IJ� r- �O O a M Q O � � � � �N O �Q�� ° °c � � �s o a � W W Q � CO � M = W o y I— 1— N � a � � a c�c � cv u� Q W M v��J � ■ �� s � gs 5 < s � N 1 1'x3' CONC. PAD FOR -----� 1-3'x5' BENCH 1-TRASH RECEPTACLE AS PER CITY SPECIFICATIONS 1-BIKE RACK � ► � • �,,,/ ��, - ' �,,,, � �� i��i •s,� / �iq�lG,� � �` �� /,. . � � ' ' / I �-' � � � �� RESTAURANT / BAR 6, 500 S. F. LOUVERS SUNSHADES (TYP.) �� ' �. � �,, � , - �_ `� • � ��.t� , ► .. .. * � , .'� ; / / . / /� �.� / �� ,� /�.,/ ��'��/.�.�iiri�►�I._ - � � • 1�' ' 11 11 ' •� - - . , � :i,•� , . MATCH LINE (SEE SHEET 3.1 � / / 'I'I / :/�'I • i � i �• i • . .- • . � 0 0 0 � J 0 0 45 0 44 26 0 27 HOTEL ENTRY � C � � � �� 0 � i � �� ' �.��'� �� - -• - -• - � GATE 50 SLIP DOCK PREVIOUSLY APPROVED UNDER FLD2009-02009 � O 0 0 43 28 � ° CLE°ARWA'�E� 42 29 � 0 A R B O R 41 30 � 0 0 0 0 0 40 31 Q6 39 0 38 37 0 36 32 0 33 34 0 35 0 0 0 0 0 50 49 48 47 46 0 0 0 � U c 0 � 0 �.J �O . � � GATE � 37.7' ��J WOCS13 �Fi�I3 �+^ o;� H�:ocxs _� -- _ �— � r� � - c� C ' - �M,,•A �� - pN � a� � I � 15' EASEMENT TO FOLLOW LINE OF BOARDWALK �� o �0 0 19 18 0 17 �� 16 0 15 14 0 13 12 0 11 o a a o 0 0 25 24 23 22 21 0 0 0 0 0 0 C � � � n .� � � 0 � 1.3` CC1NC. SEAWALL SCALE: 1 "= 20' 20 0 10 2 � 40 , O o Z � � z � � �° � �Z�� a� Nw N � Z � Z � • t�"/�Q LLW o O G g� N� � � y M � ' - z o �� c� � ^ � z ~ • z • ti = O �'.' a z � F- •o a . � � � H J W � � � o � � • W V Z W � H J Z Q W W W ° z u� a � � oti • W OM t9 a � � z � W� Z O =� g i- C� LL � y W z m� W s . �Q � ♦ v �� .� u". y Q O W E B #5936 '- � ° J c� H M V Issue Date: 10/01/10 Revisions: No. Date Descri�tion Per CITY Z � a. � t� O � _.�1�t�i�Jt�. .__ ,E�, J.--r� � , ;r�� THIS DRAWING IS AN INSTRUMENT OF SE@4�I�C�A��kL•L�uIAIN TI�E,PROPERTY OF THE ENGINEER, AND SHALL NOT BE REPROD�C l� L fi�f� OR USED.dN #iNY WAY WITHOUT THE CONSENT OF THE ENGINEER. �^L-. «� G� COPYRIG'HT'2009 �tQDT PUBUSHED ��Y' • � . �; �' ;� �p . a.�. v �A j . , a. � � 4 ( ��':` = u►� r��o�sE�, P�'�483�;'fi�AY:� 1 5 2012 COPIES OF THfSE `� • �2E � �(P�LID •C1NL�S`� - EMBOSSED WIT'�-I''`��IV6�N��NEER'S:�E(tL � ` '`-`� ��►ut�t:►``� Nz.� .. - . . .. �� 0 W � � � 0 oc � � � � 0 _ �� o� o Qo 0 �� N O � a ��` w Q � �v � a � � �m a o 0 oc � o y� � N �a � � a� �NWa O W t� � �� ■ s � & � s � N � z� �. �� :�� _� D �; �t�'t7 /� ��'a � x .�� - ro �� m� I T � E}�. STC3R�'1 MH TC3P C}F RIM �L. = �.23 18" COI�C. PIPE IVW EL. = 1.��3 �&" Ct3�iC. PIPE S EL. = �-t7.17} --��, �� f _1%g,�p��1:7'PAI�EMENT � I` ;r �/ __ _ _- _ , , x �p �� 6tI' GHT-OF-�A Y � � �'r ----- - -- _ �s, __1' VALLEY C`iJRB __�� 11� �......�.��....�ii�.....�.�.�.. .....�:.�.....��... � �I cx. �z'� ��r� •� * WATER tsATt3 � K �1, 7� N 06°29'00" E 100.0' (P)100.04' (M) � � x � � � � �� I � � � v� :S',� � c� � FL USH � � �� o 0 0 � �� u�� -------- x --- � n� !� �� ' � �� _� �._�.�----�s ��i�ri��'u, � �' �`�1 �`o �� 1S" ` ^�, �: � a'._ �''� �"�U � � �. XCURB � � � � ' P � � o/ � I � �� c x � �C1 O S• tr ��i � �� wd �� _. , � �� Jo�r 12 L � 4.7 4.5 4.7 A .(ME) �_C�.�?� BL�C� B t"� v: � .�7 � xzAA � �rr � � TC1 � r`�"J � � � /� � cZi> v � � �- � A (� `/� 11 �'C / \ N 'I �i/ I M '� � � I, � ' � Z Z'A � � I�� x� � A > � � � 1d` I '4 �7� v m N � �`t ��'`'S � � � ; � � � � xpAp � � ,,�� Z t x �> ° ' � y s? p � �� -� �� . �� I o ZDp� � I �� _ � � li x C1� � � ° �s ' > �� "� � � � � � ' D � 9; m � r � DD�m � � �: � U X N I �-.�.�-. �. ��4.7 �yp� Z wx„ ��{Sti ��■ ^ �yTm � � �� .a. r�+ XI ' v v, ' X�y �P�A � r L +� T� "� i � � � � g� •�.� �; o � C!� ,� r�. y 1�1 �� s � s� 0° ��ya �, � f ?�, a � 9 x z p A � �' 1� S'� h� � , „ � h 1 � 4.9 �> o I n � � �� y � m�� /� �� N � � ° � >a�+ � r `C '<' ' � �>A o � �i� - � i � a.' tif � > � ,n �� f E�C ��EN �I�°C V xv � �'� SEWE � c�iD�o � � -ro� �� .�M ��. = �.a� �� ° 4.9 ■!� � $" CLAY PIPE N EL. =(-i7.97) i X 4 9 4 9 X I ,v��s`� 1 � �-� EX. Z�" Gfki.1/. � } � � � � � � onr,u,;�:s X 8`� CLA`( PIF`E S EL. = -1.1% " � � � " N �} -------- � - � �' c�;s r�ar€u S" CLAY PIPE E EL. = 0.15 � T <s° 'F � 9 / ■/■/y" s __-.___ � �GnS'--iin:-Wll----6nS-W+5-4u5--_W�-GAS-CAS�GPS-GnS--Gp£"_"-GPS-US-Gn�-GaS--G+S--GpS--liFS-..-�q5-��p5__�p,s_-fd�S-GnS-Gn5-6HS-fAS---fAS-WS-GRE-WS-_WS-6pS-GnS--GHS-�fd�-WS--��TO�tiaS W� �f�5 1'y�'W-�GnS�-{y��G�S--GAS, \ -LnS-GaS-uAS--CS)---�a2--un5-id:-WS-CA�-- � ' � \ _ ■e I � � X x ' _- __ . , \ '��Yi��--- __ . ' _ ___ � , i , � y � ' ��'J � �� OpOpOp� pOpOpOpO �1 �� ' � O�O�O� �O�ODO � ------------ .� � � � � � ��p � � o _ � � _ � � �!.� � �,.� � .� .. _ ` _ _ _ _ _ .. _ __ _ - - - - - - - - �o� � � �o _ _ -�' -�' _ - _ - �Af01 Mf� `� `� � � �' "� � - EDGEf3FFAVEMENT �,; T' 3f _ Jr � �_ � •� SWING GATE W/TH DIROP •�,. •�, •� ,4SPFI�ILTPA o I � �' FUTURE STORM � �� ,;. �;D�� t�F P�vz�vl��r ;� � � �r � u• c� s � �.•� -3 T(?P t�F i�IM EL. = 3.£�2 "1 /� �£ PINS & HOLES AS P'�R,� "' FROM CITY ,� �' Q �' ��o �`�r 8"' CLAY C�� N�L. =(-1.6E�} I �, t I L� S O L I D W A S T E D E P T. a��----- -- -- X -�- --- �� -------- � x --- �- lt C� g" C�Y pIF'E � �L, _ (-t7,68� � '�s� � � •�� u :� �,r, "�. •� � EX. 6 PVC UD CONTRACTOR ��-" "•' „ �'' � s r STORM CROSS/NG � -�s `�� 3 ��,Y P�PE UV EL. =(-i.78� � � I, �� 12" D/P /NV. 2.2� TO EXERCISE CAUTION TO 'r ��' "' � � X � '� �� 19X30 ERCP TOP EL 0. 9 PROTECT THE EX. UD. PIPE X�, �v�r� «� gAVE��tT / - �� "' EX. 6" ll.Di " Ex� •,� . r� . ts : �S EX. 6'_l.f.E3. R� �'�""' � - o0000 � �... `o'oBoB�g° STC.��P�# NiN- -�.J "�� +i�'� o 0 0°';"` o000 0 0 ----- - -----'- - -- X-------- ---X -_- -�� °o'�o ��o . �E" $�o �os� - i... i. �... � � .. .■ � � .�a�� o0o a o o „�, w,�'„ � �� T�P C�}F �Z�� EL. = ryJ.�� ,,r o0000 0000po � o00000o E' I O o000o STRUCTURAL GLASS AWNING o"o"obo �� X � _ � �o�o�o 'i r�r ��r � � � � � � i � � � � � i � ii'� � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � C �� L. P�� r� ��... =�'�.�� x � o 0 0 0 0 o i o 0 0 0 �" p o 0 0 3' OVER P/L o°o°o°o° o°o°o° y� ' cP �� ------- a �c_ � , ,� O � . . e�f� cc��c, �� .. � �-z.�z� � � i ; ----------- �T- 6 � �- �5:00 - X x X i x � � � � � � � � � � � �� I , �„ W c EX. � F.H. �� ' � � � =yi � � �+ � � � - � � � �� r-- � � „ `� , � � � .,s :a •`'a � I � � i oA. ,� , , � , � � �- 22 x10 ; �1 I � � COMPACTOR l ,�jjz ' � NO ROOF ; O L__ 1 _ �-- � ;_> -- ; . ; „ , ��; .-. �� ' ;,,, ��u � � ��''�'�.�.� � �=% �� ►,. : „� ��.� ► < �• , ,, � �,�� s�r�rrc� �L�,�/-.r �R�� -__- --�- - - --,�------ --�-- ,��` �,� VERT/CAL DA TUM /NFORMA T/ON; ELE1/,4TlONS SHOWN HEREON ARE BASED ON NORTH AMERICAN VERTICAL DATUM, (N.A.V.D.) OF 1988. r.� � � �� ' «- I riiiiiiiiiiiiiii' 'iiiiiii-1 � � , , .� . . �.- - .-. . . �, �.-�:� � � TRASH STAGIN( �LOUVERS SUNSHADES (TYP.) n 4�.8 � � - 6 ,7 � x � �.O � � i ��' � � � � � ~ � � ` ■ � \ ~ % 5 5.9 �� NEW RESI�AURANT ps �° FL. EL. 6.0 LOUVERS SUNSHADES � n _ �rrP.) � PUBLIC BDARDWALK ., S 06°29'00' W 315.00' �� 6.0 +4.8 .4 � � �0 5.4 � x � WM � � ',�� x _,-� Y : . �'� x �■ O i�� PIII. FL EQ��4.745• 1 p x� �--- �, FIRE o �a� , PUA�'P ROOA� w � 1 � � ►� 1 N� RAMP � x x W X �5 4� � w ° 1 � -� ,� x .,�� . X 5 4 � . ��, � !C�1 5�i� � �s m �s�� ` V� ■ � AD�m ' x � A X �D k � � x A,2 �? �; �' '° � A>„� NEW � 7C'-�DA �1 � � ♦ ` � D A o UND ��GRO UND� + 5. 75 �� 4. 7 05 � z� A � TOP EL.L 5. �; � �D o BOT EL. 2.0 � ♦ � � x� � � � ��F � '�,� � 6 0 6.0 +5.9 +5�A �D�� ' �; ^ (DESIGNED BY � x x�o� � X 5� `��' � D p o OTHERS) � �' '' � ' �� x HDTEL t '� " � "&. ENTRY �ZA� �� c�i > o � �; N � `�-, � � x�� D � � .4 (PLAT LINE) \ LU / `�� . 5.4 � PUBLIC BOARDWALK - ��/ .`�S3 •'�.4' \ ■ / x ' �� 5 ��' . . ACCESS MANHOLE �� 5r �.,� � �� _ � --�� v��r. `� O PENCE � � �� : m �� t�riC}f)1� S�.iEB , � ►�- f3N BLC3CKS �- r p , �� c h r� i� " �- �� x� `�, F x _ -a� � � V3 00 � Q "'� �� CONTRACTOR TO LOCATE SEAWALL TIEBACKS TO AVO/D CONFLI OPOSED P/PE � O 0 0 .� �� I C�2' ? �3LC3C:K C' ��-_ i.��E3N£'. SEA«%ALL � ..�� X x. �J a � � 4�, TREE LEGEtVt3 ��PALM (SIZE) rQ uNKnrow�v �srz�� Y� �� 1� e,�tvr,an� (srz�) 12„ ��'� �� EvERGREEN (srz�� S7�ORM PIPE SCh�DULE STRUC'TURE L�NGTH SIZE & TYPE SLOPE FROM-T�D (1� �- 1� 113 12" DlP 0.26% �- Q 72 12 " RCP 0. 28% �- Q 34 15 " RCP 0. 29% �- Q 124 12" PVC 0.28% �- $� 37 18 " RCP D. 27% S'?bRM STRUC"TURE TABLE # STRU'G'IURE 7YPE G� INf! ELEV. IN QOPENING lN VAULT 1 WALL --- 2.0 QTYPE "C" INLET 2 FDOT INDEX 232 4.5 2.3 QTYPE "C" INLET 3 FDOT 1NDEX 232 4.5 2.5 Q �PENING lN VAUL T ___ WALL 2• � �TYPE "C" INLET 5 FDOT INDEX 232 4.7 2• � �TYPE "C" INLET 6 FDOT INDEX 232 4.7 2.45 7Q CONTROL STRUCTURE SEE DETAIL �, p QOPENING lN 8 SEAWALL --- �•9 NorES.• 1,) ADDITIONAL PIPEING WILL BE REQUIRED TO CONNECT RDOF DRAINS TO SiORM PIPES AND �AULT. (SEE PLUMMING PLANS) VERIFY SIZE AND PRO�IDE FITTINGS AS REL?UIRED. 2.) ALL PIPES & INLETS ARE PRI�ATELY OWNED & MAlNTAINED, 3.) ROOF DRAIN SHALL BE CONNECTED TO UNDERGROUND �AUL T. LEGEND U� �� EXIST. ELEVATION � NEW ELEVATION ♦'� O.00 EXIST. STORM SEWER ��. .�-� . �,.;�� . �„�.� ,,; ��;r .,_,;: NEW STORM SEWER � � � � � � � NEW INLET � NEW SAN. MANHOLE • C.O. NEW CLEAN-OUT(C.O.) 0 TEMP. SILT BARRIER POINT OF CONNECTION � OF NEW UTILITY TO EXIST. FLOW ARROW ,"'`� • o oZ � � z � �• �� z � '� a � j W y N W • z �? • � y a LL W 0 o p � � � o�o = � � N H '- � N M � O � � C.� Z � ~ � Z N , N • � W � � H H • o Q . � � y J W 0 � � W � � W t� z W � � J Z Q W � � Z 1l'i � Gti • W OM � a �C o Z � �� W Z o =O � � �� d y J z m� W g • �a � � � N� Q E B#5936 �� M � Issue Date: 10/01/10 Revisions: No. Date Descri tion � .4/12/12 Per DRC /2� 4/30/12 Per CITY X Z � SWALE ARROW �� T.B.O. TEMPORARY BLOW-OFF a T.&V. TAP AND VALVE r,� �� W �' � W � a Z 0 � � Z � � �#- ` THIS DRAWING IS AN INSTRUMENT OF SERVICE AND SHALLtiRE�AI�I: TF#E�P.ROF'�4bT�l' OF THE ENGINEER, AND SHALL NOT BE REPRODUCED, PUBLISHF� �01�'`;USED,.(N.AIVY� AY dWjH0U7 THE CONSENT OF THE ENGINEER. �bf�YRiGMJ ;200�9EN0i.�'UBLI519ED J ��.•�.� �. � �' � • �; v � A`�+�'� ' , _ , G� 't�o, ''� _ , , ', � �LA� D. HOUSEL�, : #14836 - : , _ �j , .� �e�,;,1 5 COPIES OF THESE PLANS ARE�NQ�'a/ALib ��5 `; ,= ,C� e F, EMBOSSED WITH THE SIGNING= EN� N�ER'S SEAL ., \.• •-. � F i �, � � i�� t�,^ J��•;'";�� iltlttitit`` . � sfi z�3 "A "�'6.. erete,..a ...iN.isk M .. .. � � �� W V� � � O � `� � � O � � �O O ao 0 � � � �N O .Q ; � � �°o� � � a Q o � °° �o=~ N� I � � Q G�C � N W Q O W �� ■ �c O F i ci �x-3 1 � 1 � � NOTE: FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTONS SHALL BE IDENTIFIED BY A SIGN THAT STATES "NO PARKING, FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTION" IN ACCORDANCE WITH FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION STANDARDS. WITH ACLEARANCE OF 7-1/2 FEET IN FRONT OF AND TO THE SIDES OF APPLIANCE. � � �z �. � �}� �� ;'� X �� (� �� EX. STt�F��i MH T4P t)� RINi EL, = 4.23 18" CC�i�C. PIPE IVW EL, = 1.i}8 16" CG�1C. PIPE S EL. =(-0.1i) — , �� f ��;�, �g,sPx_a��°�AV��i�nTr_�+�` — lr' �. � , - , � � � _ � � � � 60' GHT-G►� �A Y � :� ,� � i / � __... _..___ _._.___.. _��___..... �._. ��' ---- -- '�'� — ��o� 1' VAL.LE� C`URB �6,? �� / � � �I ��°y TrEire��o��r�ii�s�rr--�-��rr r��-w:rr��s��o ��, +J° "' EX. i2" FRt�P� t `,� �� y � WAl'ER MAIN � �� h �� , ( IV E W FHA >� N 06°29'00" E 100.0' (P)100.04' (M) % � t � { x � � � � �� T � � ��-�, , �� fV E I�V FD C � w� � � �s�; � �, � � � � / � � �t �� o 0 0 0 o q I j x � �� / E�� '�'� � x ` � if - -• '�'� +� O O p �a �s � � � � ` ' " � � � � \�_ �. ' �"�� p�p�p p�p�p� IrOT 1$ � � i �� I�`�'� 1> �� 17P�Vi.1� B i��`� 57 �ppm ��"' Ci � I ✓? C/1 •� T. Z,y A< � � � � � I �� 1 � � a n � � �y m0 � �� 19 . 4 � � `� ; � � � IS "� .. � O AZ°AC � � � � Z-Am � � p � � _ � � � �' o � � � � ��I 1 . � �, � r^ Za�� w V) FZpA � � t � �' � , � � � x y "' ° 9 v ��.�y 1� � � � r .� � \ '- . i'" , r , �, �' � �St, • 1 � �zOr' ■ � � � �� f � � � `� � �yAO � � � � u, EX. � � � � � X �G D � � � � � � i-i , � � � �' � � y; "� m "� ! �s_. F'.�. N (`T!\ "ppp � � � � '� E`gi � , , • - . � � 1 � �' O � nx , � - Z � � � � �I{�`,R 6> > rj ■ , , � " � X �A�A � _ � Y,� � � /� '.� � i r � � � X � � Z p �./ • � '--' t�j �� ' ° �/ ` � ` � , N � b'9 � `S .p v; m � y D *� � � , � �Q ' � ZZ'�� , �{ � � �: y O � c `� - � �� _ � rn '� � � � � � �PO�A � � � SCALE: 1 — 10 � � � _ � y■ zD � � ■ �_ � i A ■ �� x �� ZZA� � � i_ia. a��1�i �Fi V a �J SEWE c>> o ■ � Tf�P {3� Rltvi EL. = 4.03 `�� CO �-- �.' : � �� a �fj�° rr / c� '■ � � �� N �.] O� I �� . :< � X R, .°,s a�,, v� �.,= � �'ES ,�� „4�---� � � ��j �G �� ` x � � -'�� 'v x � �� r � � pip m �-ts �-3 �P �" �a a. • �� ..�� a �.� k� T� �� 8" CLAY PIF'E N EL =(-Q.�7) X x ��SF� � i, 8" CLAY PIPE s EL. = 1.17 " " " � �.�LtY.� � � '� , EX. �" u�LV. � � � � � � � x -- • �l.,,�� .. ��,� ��r�, s�° c�a� �� E�. = a.i� �,� C■///��.//� T A /�� /�6• ��,� � � �4nS-�--W.:—GAS---:s.S—w�5—Ii23---iF.3 -GA1�—WS�GAS—�Ga,S.—'�pc___��__�5___�S_""�pS____�qg_'fAS�—GRS—GnS--LPS--WS—Ga$--('AS—GA�—Gfl$—WS--Gn"a-6nS—GR$—CAS—WT—WS—GAS—GA$__.�p ..__�qS��q�}--�TO�G0.5 W$ ��f�i 1'��GAS�y—tAS--GF6 X —6nS—GPS�—GaS.--Lpc_�CAS--unS—�PS—GAS—Ga� � � 6 � �� _ ___�� . / ` .— . . . �_. � � " , ✓ x x � � '� � � � -- 9�� 1 000000� o0000000 .� ; � , � o�o�o� �o�o�o �� , , o0 00� -� r �� ■ ■�r.a��■ ■�.rr�■�...■—.i.—■.r■■� . �1' .�..�. .�r � . m � � ■ ■ ;, „ o'o^o°o°a°o° • �_ _ -______- .._ Y__ a __�..___._...._._._._....__.�__....._._..._�._.._.. .d>i °,,�� t � �? ' ;;, „� EI}GL-: C)F PAVEMEN'I` ,,� � ,.,� •� v� ,� ;;, I:I3G�: OF FAVEMEN,T -- 5�,4� NEH � C � # � �� N '��, •�¢, �cs�, .4SPI��LTPA � I_ ! � � '��`�,o ' � •�, �€`6?E� i�F RI� EL. = 3.�2 -- � � � -- -- �- ° � � �.,� 8" C`LAY ['IPE f� EL. = (-I.��} I �, � + x - y � X --------- - X -- - �'Q --�-- Y , � £�" Ct�Y PI€�E � EL. _ ;-Q.f�8) / '�'s� � � �. � � p �; "•'�� NEW 8" a�s � �� .�� t�" CLAY PIPE UV EL. =(-�..7t3) � � �� %EW F.ljA W� ; r,�. � ` SANITARY G�l ��I�iH� Y�i � s / .,� t°`" � x x. x � t�''.I x x x x I:�GE f3F PAVEIVIINT �" � S`> " t t � q,s, �.y�.... � E\. fJ" U�D-.. ��. s o u °�= y E7C� � S� � t3 � t5` 1$' Ei{< 5��l��C?. i � ` ��i��{ i� �"'� J � _ � � � jtS� � o 0,�g 0 � r o°o°o 00000 000000 00o va�gBoB�B�S° � ..�. o. � � � �. � ... X.� e � �. �.. ... � � � � ...X � .� ,o � � � �p^y°��^y�^.,�yyp�n^3 � �"� �$� `+1e +�6 � - - rr - �r • - � �r ne � ar � �Q�Q I 5✓f" V� i�li•1 ��. °'— �,�J p�p p�0�0� O�O�O�O �' i � � ��p�0 —O—O� �� _ if � -o� i c � �� - !i � � � r � - � �� • � � � � � � � • i � � � O i i i i i � i `�` � o 0 0 0 � o o . o o STRUCTURAL GLASS AWNING °o�o�o�o o°o°o X � � �1° •---•� �„ �� P�� ,� ��. ��_� �� „ o 0 0 0 0 � o o , �, o 0 0 3' OVER P/L o 0 0 0 0 0 0 � � rx 3 ` 2 ��' `�`�' . �EB Ct��IC. PIf�E E EL. = (-�.4�) ... � � 19.4 � � ■ � ■ �` � � i _ - Q �t_ _ - Q - ■ ■ ■ �'i � ■ � ■ O �� _ ---- x f ' � . � � � � � �� _ � � � � � � � �(P� � � � � � � � . � � � _��___-____- � ----- -------- ----- �' �L� S��- " „ ' �+'�� ., � ' � . � � ` �� • • • � MANHO�E �� O - ---- �`� 's� ^ � �� JFIH. PC ER! EX ----- -------- ----- - ---�____________ �xzs�r�r�c_� r�xnu�- � g � < � N �� EpNP. R0011 E�. � NEW SANITARY X �� \ � � � � . / I � CORAL STONE TWO � MANHOLE � �' SIDED WATER FALL I �� y■� ■ � ■ � •r 'o"�"' ■ � �s� �� I NEW GREASE NEW 3" WATER MA/N �� I R� � Cs1 �� ■ TRAP I � o �► . � t �' i�� i 0 NEW GATE � VALVE NEW GATE r& v � � x ,� x \� � r-- � � 'C7 � ` u} � VAL VE x � uh 'us� .� ' � � 'S�, � '.c �J X � y�o-�a��li�� i�� r�,�� u' 'Sc� x s� �� Ci � �` ��; i ii `` S �� m `� A Q� 1 L__" � � � 7c'�—_C�i.1m7 � �'� � NEW WA TE�? 4 � „` � �'"� � �,� . � LOUVERS x . �� METER �__ SUNSHADES � ooao `"�► ;�o A � � � -- (TYP.) � ■ t � "` ,� �>AO � � , , ■ ■ � !_ � A � �+ ��.� -- � , i /VEIY 1..�. � � yZ�m � � A A � � � �,�''�` ■ � �—NEW C.O. +�„ `' � �'�1 � � '� � X � � .�, �� y � '� _ � �� A F us X � � , _ � �j O � , � • I �, � ■ x x -o ; m � ,L�G't � � � - � x y �Z�A t J 4 � x C'3 � y` C+ �`'9 �> A O i t �,// y� ''�'-'� ,1: ' . � � £a �� ,�J� � X tY` - �. � � �t� �; u� i7' i - ` � `J : ♦ ZZAA � ,�� ` � .. ' r" � ,'� � D v �' ■ 46X�8'� ° m �� ..� ■ ;y�1 � � � � ' T . � _ � Z '�'� � �D 0 � u ��t� X� X� 1 i � 1 � � X �F.� �'� �� ` , - �� ' � � LDUVERS SUNSHADES ONE ETWO �? � o�, I �.�Fr�� 1 � � (rrP.) � I1 �'� . � L PUBLIC BOARDWALK 4 •..� S 06°�9'00' W 315.00' 1 fii� 1 1 (PLAT LINE) NEW STAND PIPE WATER LINE \ LU / 2-1 /2" HOSE VAL VE j PUBLIC B�ARDWALK - �///////////// .�.9 •'�x \ ■ / � U �O `� � � � O C � H N� �� sr ..� � �5�x � O O�Ei' i%ITv�'L -� o ��Ne� � � - r �� -�f �-- � ��v <(:�L2S' s.sa WCtC)�1 S]iEB �� ..QCi� � '~ - r� 1 " „ �_ Cr xL m�� „� ��-- >� x� ; � x _ -�,.� �h .� � � .Gp .�� n �� '�� Lt�r � �LE�cx c; �-�------- :�-- --- 4a �s 1.'.i��;�7NC;. SFA4�TALL � �°a � xY � �� '�� X � .�, � � 9� TR�E LEGEII�fl �z„ PACM (SIZ�) Y� unrK�ro wn� �srz�� o�K �srz�} � z° � eantrant (srz�} 22" a�� '�� EVERGREEN {SIZE) � �" ��o •a�t3 LEGEND EXIST. SAN. SEWER �-..�,, ,. r��:,.� ��,s,��,�� ,a n��4��t�: NEW SAN. SEWER � ■ � ■ � ■ � EXIST. WATER SERVICE � � � � �- - � �, NEW WATER SERVICE ■■■■■■■■■■■■■ NEW INLET � NEW SAN. MANHOLE • C.�. NEW CLEAN-OUT(C.O.) 0 POINT OF CONNECTION � OF NEW UTILITY TO EXIST. � M METER F.H.A. FIRE HYDRANT ASSEMBLY F.D.C. FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTION T.B.O. TEMPORARY BLOW-OFF T.&V. TAP AND VALVE SANITARY STRUC"TURE TABLE # '�� T�P FJ.E'V. 1NV. ELEV. O EXIST/NG 4.03 EL. S—�� 7 MANHOLE EL. E 0.15 O NEW --- --- MANHOLE O NEW --- --- MANHOLE SEIIVITARY PIPE SCh�DULE STRUCTURE L VGTH SSIZB � TYPE SLOPE FROM-?n (r17 O O 40 8" PVC ---% O O 158 8" PVC ---� 3O 4O 58 8" PVC ---% SCALE: 1 "=20' 20 0 10 2 � 40 �, M W o � Z � ~ Z ' � O � � � Z �' Q � j W N ♦ Z �? � . fW/� Q � W 0 o G g� o� � � fH M � '- Z O v � Z � ~ � z . _ • ti = O � � Z ~ ~ • o Q ' � W o� � � a . W V Z W :.i � J Z Q Wc i � � C � Q � • W OM � a �o z � W� Z � 2� � � v� � y I1J z m� W g' �a � � N� E B #5936 '— � M J v H V Issue Date: 10/01/10 Revisions: No. Date Description � � � W � � � W � � � '"� � THIS DRAWING IS AN INSTRUMENT OF SERVICE AND SHA d+k�r�lN'f�E��PRQPERI'(..OF THE ENGINEER, AND SHALL NOT BE REPRODUCED, PUBLI ��, OR sUSEU �IAY: �1dY 'WQY WITHOUT THE CONSENT OF THE ENGINEER. ��01�((2�GHT��U9 NbTI PUBLI�HED tie��.: �,G�,d ,. .�1�" � � \ . 4 7^e!� :,�}�J� �' _ VI�v� � �y ,�a _ � LARR1(D. HOU�I�, E;:��'l4836� ; �l�� ;��Zp�Z COPIES OF THESE PLANS �RE bpT,,�/ w t{R1 LESS ��' �'' EMBOSSED WITH THE SIGI�INJfGg,EtilGf�J�R'S SEAL�� ti , j�/ � (` '�' C, 1 ('`, � `a '�` \\� t ls��,�lllift�tti�``• �� 0 W � O � 0 � � �� H � O � � !� �O � ao 0 � � � �N W� � Q > w � ° o c=.� � � �m Q o o� � o y� 1�—/ N � a I1� � a � ��"Wa 0�� s � g � R N 1'-0•' STANDARD PRE—PAINTED DISABLED PARKING SIGN ON 1/8" THICK SHEET ALUMINUM � PARKING BY DISABLED PERMIT ONLY �255 FINE F. S. 31$,18 � � ' �. '. I I a. ' a e � �� I I I— a.:� �, a: —I I I - I � o I li o I- I I — � I — � �o . d I I d e .0 Q i � � , . � WHITE BORDER -f— & SYMBOL (TOP OF THE SIGN) BLUE BACKGROUND BLACK BORDER �— & LETTERS (MIDDLE OF THE SIGN) WHITE BACKGROUND BLACK BORDER �— & LETTERS (BOTTOM OF THE SIGN) WHITE BACKGROUND Z V � I� cn o 2" HOT DIPPED GALVANIZED STANDARD WEIGHT STEEL PIPE N I rn 8" X 2'-6" CONCREfE MASS. FINISH TOP OF MASS LEVEL WITH A SLIGHT RAISED WASH APPROXIMATELY 1/2° ABOVE LEVEL OF TURF/SOD. TYPICAL HANDICAPPED SIGN DETAIL CITY INDEX N❑. 119; 1❑F 1 N.T.S. PARKING BY DiSnBLED PERMIT ONLY g250 FINE F.S. 318.1 NOTE: ALL LETTERS — 1" SERIES "C" F PLACE CONC. SLAB/WALK 4° BELOW FLOOR ELEV. EXCEPT AT DOORS REMAIN FLUSH. EXPANSION JOINT SL(�PE AT 1 /4" PER FOOT 10:1 MAX. SLOPE SOD NOTES: 1. PIROVIDE 5'x5'x4" THICNC CONC. SLAB � ALL EMERGENCY EXITS. 2. CONFORM TO ABOVE DETAIIL FOR PIACING WALKS AT THE BLDGS. PLACEMENT OF CaNCRETE SLAB AT ALL BUILDINGS N.T.S. P SEE PLAN I NEW ASPHALT AND BASE � �---� � 6^�I SIGN WHEEL i STOP EACH PARKING CONC WALK AMP ' -RAM SPACE SHALL BE DOWN ` DO CONSPICUOUSLY �a�ncE so� ,/2�� BELOW P,V�VEMENT � FIN. CRADE PRIOR � TO SODDIING POSITIVE DRAINAGE (4:1 MAX) � MEET EX. F SEE PLAN NEW ASPHALT AND BASE � COMPACTED GROUND PLACE SOD 11/2" BELOW PAVENAENT �— FIN. GRADE WRIOR � TO SODDING �POSITIVE DRAIINAGE (4:1 MAX) � MEET EX. ` ' COMPACTED GROUND GROUND TRANSITION AT THE PROPERTY LINE N.T,S. GRADE Z � ,\' .. ��' .., �c.�'��// ,,�0,� � WATER MAIN OR STORM DRAIN 18�� MIN. VERTICAL CLEARANCE � '�' SAN. SEW�R Z ta io � WATER MAIN OR STORM DRAIN D.I.P. IS USED IN PLACE OF P.V.C. FOR ,A MIN. OF 10� EACH WAY EXIST. SURFACE SAW—CUT EXIST. EDGE OF PAVEMENT & BASE NEW SURFACE EXIST. BASE NEW BASE NEW SUBBASE PAVEMENT TRANSITION DETAIL N.T.S. FILL GROUND AROUND BLDG. TO 3" BELOW FIN. FLOOR ELEVATION & SOD MAX. SLOPE 4:1 MIN. SLOPE 2% GROUND PREPARATION AT ALL BUILDINGS N.T.S. + FROMI C� OF WATER MAIN WHEN GRADE T THE \VERTICAL CLEARANCE BETWEEN i WATE(R & SEWER MAINS IS 18� OR LESS. � "" � "' '"�� , ,� Z 18" OR LESS VERTICAL CL. I M� WATER MAIN + I 10' MIN. L P.V.C. OR V.C.P. HORIZONTAL CLEARANCE I SAN. SEWER GRAVITY MAIN INOTE: CONCRETE ENCASEMENT OF STORM SEWER + SANITARY SEWER GRAVIN oR SaN. SEwER MAIN IS NOT PERMITTED. cR,s,virr MAIN VERTICAL CLEARANCE HORIZONTAL CLEARANCE ATE R AI N& AN TARY EWER LEARA CE N.�.S. . � � �� .� � , x �„ � , , :. STRIPED IN BLUE ��`� ��. �, �� ff{ ' - AND WHITE PAINT, !z `` �� "' � �" � � AND SHALL BE POSTED � �� ;� � �� AND MAINTAINED WITH A ��_ �� ;� `° _ �� 5 � - PERMANENT, ABOVE— �� `� � �� GRADE SIGN BEARWG ' -�� - �� ° � �' � � THE INTERNATIONAL r ' � 2' '�' SYMBOL OF ACCESSIBILLITY � �., x � °" � °� AND THE CAPTION �� PARKING BY DISABLED , �... � ��y� s�'� �� ; �._: � �' � , ,�� ;�� , �� PERMIT ONLY". SUCH SIGNS SHALL NOT BE OBSCURED BY A HC 6�� 6�� VEHICLE PARKED IN THE SYMBOL f--i r-i SPACE. ALL HANDICAPPED 6.. 6.� i--+ f--i 4, W PARKING SPACES MUST m = BE SIGNED & MARKED 3�'m � 3 IN ACCORDANCE WITH _� � 2� THE STANDARDS 2° ADOPTED BY THE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND A.D.A. HANDICAP PARKING STRIPING DETAIL N.T.S. NOTE: SILT FEIWCE SHALL NOT BE TRENCHED lN WHERE ADJACEMT TO TREES DESIGNATED TD REMAIN. THE SlL7� FENCE MUST BE SECURED iHROUGH THE PLACEMENr OF FILL OVER THE LOWER LlP OF THE THE LOVWER UP OF TNE BARRICADE. I �5 to MIN. 18,� �� 6� MAX.—� POST OPTIONS.• 2 z4 " OR 2.5 "DIAM. W000; 1.33LBS/F7: MIN. STEEL F!L TER FABRIC lN CONFORMANCE WITH SEC. 985 F. D. D. T. SPECS. OR EQUAL EXIST. : !— GROUND - PRINCIPAL POSr OPTIONAL J �� POSITION, CANTED POST � 20' TOINARD FLOW POSITION W I �� FILTER FABRIC � SlL r I,,,_FLOW EXIST. , —„ � � � ,—,,, �— GROUND � I LT BARRI E R D ETAI L �.T.S. a � PLACE SOD 1/2" BELOW PAVEMENT NEW ASPHALT FIN. GRADE PRIOR AND BASE TO SODDING `°° �� _ r— POSITIVE DRAINAGE � COMPACTED GROUND P CEMENT F S D AT PAVE E NT N.T.S. NEW BLDG. � i � i i i .i i .a � � FIN. FL ' i i 5' �di i III=_IIIL=I IJIII_ i i , i i I I� ,., � � ROOF DRAIN FIN. GROUND UTILITY (i.e. SANITARY SEWER, WATER SERVICE, FIRE LINE OR STORM DRAIN) BY 51TE CONTRACTOR TO 5' FROM BLDG. � ` UTI�IlY WITHIN 5' OF BLDG. BY PLUMBING CONTRACTOR. FINAL CONNECTION BY PLUMBING CONTR4CTOR UNLESS OTHERWISE COORDINATED BY THE G.C. UTILITY CONNECTION AT ALL BUILDINGS N.T.S. FINISH GRADE TO 1" BELOW EDGE OF WALK MEDIUM BROOM FINISH CONC. WALK EXPANSION JOINT 1-1/2" RADIUS VERTICAL CURB ( � I + - 4 ` ` 6�' PAVING COMPACTED FILL� �� I_I I) I� BASE OR UNDISTURBED soi� COMPACTED i+ °��. 9° I I I II I i l` SUBBASE 3,000 PSI — '_� i I NOTE: CONCRETE IIIII �� I PROVIDE 7/4' � � � � � CONTROL JOINTS � 4'O.C., 5' O.C., 8' O.C., OR 12' O.C. & 1/2'� BITUMINOUS EXPANSION JOINTS O 40' O.C. FOR 4' SIDEWALKS, 50� O.C. FOR 5' OR GREATER. CURB/WALK DETAIL N.T.S. MEDIUM BROOM FINISH CONC. WALK FINISH GRADE TO 1 " BELOW EDGE OF WALK 2� LEVEL 2' LEVEL SHOULDER VARIES (SEE PLAN) SHOULDER SOD SLOPE 1/4" PER FOOT SOD ��_��_ ` _ '- '.. q.'... ' _��_�� II II_IIII_ . II�11=111I � COMPACTED FILL OR UNDISTURBED SOIL WHEN SIDEWALK IS TO BE REMOVED &/OR NEW SIDEWALK IS TO BE ADDED, IT IS TO BE REMOVED TO THE NEAREST EXPANSION JOINT. NOTE: PROVIDE 1/4" CONTROL JOINTS Q 4�O.C., 5' O.C., 8� O.C., OR 12' O.C. & 1/2" BITUMINOUS EXPANSION JOINTS @ 40' O.C. FOR 4' SIDEWALKS, 50' O.C. FOR 5� OR GREATER. CONCRETE WALK DETAIL N.T.S. ` O O W � � op Z � �° �z � � � w � a� NW • Z �Z • 0 � � y a �- W � � W � � otDO N � N = '- y M � � � � Z Z • ti � • W � W OC � � � � � � Q � � y J LL� � � � O o. OWC ♦ W c.i z W � � J z QW � W W � � c a z u� � pti � W OM � a �� z � W� z p =� J g y JLL Z m � �. �Q � ♦ v Q � , � ya EB #5936 ' � ° � C! 1— M (,� , `■ Issue Date: 10/01/10 Revisions: No. Date Descriotion .- ■- — � J a � W � W � � J � � � THIS DRAWING IS AN INSTRUMENT OF SERVICE AND �jY1tL�- REA�AIN T11�; �f0�g TY OF THE ENGINEER, AND SHALL NOT BE REPRODUCED, PUB��H�D'�F3-tJ�€�D']�d.gTlY WAY��WITHOUT THE CONSENT OF THE ENGINEER. �'r. . "� ,t � �_ ' •� : . G :. ' : �rrw," '�'�c`�� '"{`. � ' _� %'.��,a` _ __ r � ��} �� -� �:- - = LARRXD.�OU3E�� .�,. #'1d836`�� . �;��j� COPIES OF THESE PLAN� A'�E� � VAL UNLE 5�v.' � EMBOSSED WITH THE SIGNING��M�{EfR'� �A� .•' t�_` `� . . ` �` I'''�1r�t i11L��L``` . �:: Y+- - ti:ry �n'-� u'.�A�...��;e-_ � .. . �� W � O � O �OC � `�� O �� r � 0 ao 0 � �� 6f� �N O .� Q � � � 0 ° °c � �/ � I1� � W W 0 �m `Z o O � O y� 1 � 0 y� � "' W a O ° �� C„� � �r c� ■ f I � � r 316 SERIES STAINLESS STEE CLAMPS, SEE NOTE 4 BELOW PROPOSED GRAVITY SANITARY SEWER� C�UPLING T❑ BE CENTERED BETWEEN PIPE ENDS FLEX-SEAL ADJUSTABLE REPAIR COUPLING� SERIES MR-ARC WITH 316 STAINLESS STEEL SHEAR RINGS :XISTING GRAVITY SANITARY SEWER- N❑TES� 1. THE SPACE BETWEEN PIPE ENDS SHALL NOT EXCEED 1-INCH. PIPE ENDS SHALL BE EVEN AND CLEAN. 2. THE N�MINAL DIAMETER OF THE PR�POSED PIPE SHALL BE EQUAL T❑ THE NOMINAL DIAMETER OF THE EXISTING PIPE. 3. FLEX-SEAL ADJUSTABLE REPAIR CLAMP SHALL BE MANUFACTURED BY THE MISSION RUBBER C�MPANY, OR APPROVED EQUAL. 4. FOR APP�ICATI�NS ❑F 24' DIAMETER AND LARGER, USE 316 SERIES, WIDE, T-BOLT CLAMPS. SWB 09/00 SWB 06/02 SWB 06/04 SWB 03/06 DISSIMILAR PIPE C�UPLING DETAIL MARCH 1998 S30-60 COUNTERSUNK PVC PLU FINISHED GRADE� =�1 L PVC AD 6'x 45° PLUG END, SLIP x SL PVC A�DAPTER SLIP x THREAD 18'x18'x4' CONCRETE COLLAR, 3000psi 6'x 6'x 6' WYE, MIN. � TYPICAL SECTION VIEW PLUG SECTION VIEW INVERT OF � _� + \ / PLUG PLAN VIEW N Z ¢ � z a Z 0 x N H a N OTES: 1. THIS SANITARW CLEAN �UT IS T❑ BE USED IN SODDED AREAS ONLY THAT ARE NOT ACCESSIHLE T❑ VEHICULAR TR!AFFIC. 2. PLUG SHALL CONFORM TO THE SPECIFICATIONS AND SHALL HAVE A GASKET. 3. WYE SHALL CmNF�RM TO ASTM D-3034, & NSF STANDARD #14. SWB 06/Ol SWB 06/02 SWB 06/04 SWB 03/06 PROPOSED PAVEMENT PROPOSED PAVEMENIT (SEE NOTES �5 &#6) BASE 1 1/2 TIMES MEET & MATCH EXISTING EXISTING BASE 9° MIN (SEE NOTES #5 &#I6) BASE TO MATCH EXISTING ��2° (MIN) � (SEE NOTES #3 &#4) 6�� MIN (SEE NOTES #3 & #4� < �� --I 1 ' -• ' -_ 1 ' 4�-- 4" (MIN) �. . . ' ... . - _ _ _ - _ • _ - � ,1. , , � ,Le I / / �--- ' ---� �..,. . .- :-..a :.:,. . . ..g_�.:_ �. ..: . ...: =:' :..:.. � 1 I 2, .., . •.. .:...Z ... 1 I � � � ao � NOTES /�\�/� gACKFILL W �\ CONCRETE BACKFILL ti�\� \\� �• FOR ALTERNATE 1, USE 3000 PSI HIGH, EARLY-STRENGTH CONCRETE OR OTHER �� (SEE NOTE J�2) o �� (SEE NOTE #1) (SEEVARIES �2) w\\/�\\ 2. BACKOILLDFOR T ENCH S ALL BE PLAC DTENIA;�� COMPACTED LAYERS TO 100� OF �j� j�� VARIES `?\��\\ /\//�\ �PROP ��\//�\ MO ENG NEERS IAP ROVAL)ERMIEST� REPORTS TARE EQUIRED ANDLSUBIMITTEpT100 PINELLAS COUNTY, \// \// \I /� I� \// � � � PROP� � \� \� j\/ `PIPE� �\�\�/ 3. BASE MATERIAL SHALL BE PLACED IN 6° COMPACTED LAYERS TO 989i OF MAXIMUM /�\�j� �P�E� Q � ��-- Q � DENSITY AS DETERMINED BY AASHTO T-180. (TEST REPORTS ARE REQUIRED). � -� \ j � 7� (TYP) 4. AS AN ALTERNATIVE TO COMPACTED BASE AND IN WET AREAS, FULL-LIFf PC-2 OR PC-3 / �\ ��NP� / ASPHALTIC CONCRETE SHALL BE PLACED IN 2" COMPACTED LAYERS, NOT LESS THAN 6" THICK. � �� \ �\ ��\ 5. ASPHALTIC CONCRETE PAVEMENT JOINTS SHALL BE SAW-CUT AND ALL SURFACES TACK COATED. /�\ /�\ 6" BEDDING MATERIAL 6. SURFACE SHALL BE CONSISTENT WITH EXISTING SURFACE AND THICKNESS WITH MINIMUM OF 6° BEDDING MATERIAL #57 CRUSHED STONE � 1/2" ASPHALT PAVEMENT, IN ACCORDANCE WITH PINEILAS COUNTY SPECIFICATIONS. AS ETERMI EDTBYE AS DETERMINED BY 7. OVERLAY OF CONSTRUCTION SCARS TO PAVEMENT AND TRENCH SHALL BE REQUIRED AS THE ENGINEER THE ENGINEER DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER OR INSPECTOR. ALTERNATE � 8• EXCAVATION SHALL COMPLY WITH THE TRENCH SAFEN ACT REQUIREMENTS. ALTERNATE Z PAVEMENT CUTS, EXCAVATION 8c RESTORATION EXTERI�R INTERIDR �-1/2' ANTI-FLOTATION FLANGF� �H�� HILTI-316 S.S. KWIK B�LT lt, FRP MANH��E WASHER �R APPROVED EQUAL � SEE SCHEDULE BELOW FOR BOLT 3' 3" QUANTITIES SEWER PIP 'LINK-SEAL' CONNECT�R, 21' AND LARGER PIPES, ~ w W AND ALL F�RCE MAINS ¢ a 'INSERTA TEE' ❑R FRP MANHOLE 'KOR-N-SEAL' CONNECTOR, � BASE REINF�RCEMENT- 4' THRU 18' PIPES SEE SCHEDULE BELOW - MIN. 3' C�VER LAMINATED SLEEVE AND SUPPORTS, TYP. CAST-IN-PLACE BASE PIPE C❑NNECTI❑N DETAIL ANCH❑R C❑NNECTI�N DETAIL RING AND COVER ASSEMBLY-�� SEE SCHEDULE BEL�W 4 E FLEXIBLE SEALENT, USE 'FLEX-SEAL UTI SEALENT' MGF. BY SEALING SYSTEMS ❑R APPROVED EQUAL-2' ALONG NECK FILL GAP WITH NON-SHRINK GROUT, USE- 'MASTER 713' MGF. BY MASTER BUILDERS �R 'S�NOGROUT' MGF. BY SONNBORN PLASTER COATING OVER RING 3/4' PLASTER COATING UPT❑ 5 BRICK ❑R PRECAST CONCRETE GRADE RINGS CONCRETE BENCH T❑ SUPPORT THE BRICK OR GRADE RINGS FRP MANHOLE SEALING DETAIL S C H E D U L E S M A N H❑ L E S A N C H❑ R B❑ L T S MAX. RING/ WT BASE BT TYPICAL MIMINUM ANCHORS M.H. ACCS MAX. BASE M.H. PER MH DIA PIPE ' �VE WALL IDT BASE B�LT EMBEDMENT DIA. DIA, DIA' TYPE DEPTH THKNESS E/W THKNESS REINF. DEPTH DIA. LENGTH 4' S' 6' 4' 18' 24' E 10' 0.318' 6' 8' #4 @ 10' EW 4' T❑ 5' 1/2' 3-1/2' 6 6 B 5' 18' 24' E 25' 0.50' 7' 9' #4 @ 10' EW 5' T❑ 10' S/8' 4' 6 8 12 5' 48' 32' B 25' 0.50' 7' 9' t14 @ 10' EW 10' T❑ 15' S/8' 4" N/A 13 18 6' 18' 24' E 25' 0.50' 8' 10' #4 @ 10' EW IS' T❑ 20' 3/4' 4-3/4' N/A 13 18 6' 48' 32' B 25' 0.50' B' 10" #4 @ 10' EW 0' T❑ 25 3/4' 4-3/4" N/A 16 23 �IBERGLASS MANHOLE SWB o6,0� SCHEDULES DETAIL SWB 03/06 JUNE 2001 S30-52 PC 1291 SANITARY SEWER CLEAN ❑UT FOR NON TRAFFIC AREAS DETAIL DEC. 1999 S30-31 W 2'-6" DIA. SEE NOTE CAST IRON FRAME AND COVER EQUAL TO U.S. FDUNDRY #USF 7621 #4 REFORCING BARS-E.W. R�ADWAY OR DRIVEWA`F� .- ',' �O : _ �.. :. ' . ..�....;: �c.'�-:� .;. 'd:: e :2 • t- : PVC ADAPTE `.°''± ."� � . �` � 6• 6'x 45°, BEN �. 6' a : \ 1 PLUG END, SLIP x SLI �. .d' yf ��r`.�a? + C�NCRETE ENCASEMENT, 6• 6, 3000 psi ,,,., �r., 6'x 6'x 6' WYE INVERT OF TYPICAL SECTION VIEW (Z) PENETRATING PICKHOLE MACHINED SURFACE 1-3/4' RAISED LETTE S B' 13-1/2" FRAME AND C❑VER SECTI❑N C❑VER SECTION VIEW PLAN VIEW � � + \ / PVC ADAPTER PLUG PLUG SLIP x THREAD SECTIDN VIEW PLAN VIEW N❑TES� . TH SAN TARY CLEAN ❑UT IS TO BE USED IN ALL TRAFFIC AREAS INCLUDING THE PARKWAY FR M R 1 IS I , 0 CU B T❑ PROPERTY LINE OR SIDEWALK 2. IN ASPHALTIC PAVEMENT AREAS CONCRETE COLLAR SHALL BE L�WERED 3' FR�M GRADE T❑ ALL�W F�R THE ASPHALT T� BE AROUND COLLAR. COLLAR IS 5' THICK IN THESE AREAS. 3. PLUG SHALL CONFORM T❑ THE SPECIFICATIDNS AND SHALL HAVE A GASKET. 4. WYE SHALL C�NFORM T❑ ASTM D-3034, & NSF STANDARD #14. SWB 06/Ol SWB 06/02 SWB 06/04 SWB 03/06 SANITARY SEWER CLEAN ❑UT FOR TRAFFIC AREAS DETAIL MARCH 1993 S30-30 4' MIN. 4' NIN. (6> (6) 4' MIN. 1t'-2' MIN. 4' MIN. 5._y. M� 3 �6� 6' NIN. � VARNINGBAREA ��6� DETECT pREA WARNIN � M N. 'a' I DETECTAHLE � `� �`.�\`� �MID POINT) ;� SIDEWALK CURB, `� � VARNING AREA �.\,P p� TYPICAL �' i a� �Z�� (M1D POINT) �' Y� �.�` A TAPER BHCK, TYP. 2/e. � 1:1 :12`. ' 1:1 �12 L�T. �� Sim mxx� "�10' MM.-TYPE_I�'- -_"'� l6' M[N.-i _^YPE 1_ �----' 3• 9• 3• I 9" I 15'-6' MIN.-TYPE II I 26'-4' MIN: TYPE II _ I l5' TYPE I AND TYPE II TYPE I AND TYPE II TYPE III TYPE III FOR TYPE H CURB FOR TYPE A OR D CURB FOR TYPE B CURB F�R TYPE A OR D CURB � 2' DETECTABLE VARNING AREA E%. SI➢EWALK CURB FLOV LINE m ROADVAY SURFACE � 6'-0 STD. 4' MIN. LANDING LANDIN � .12 0.02 o.oe 0.02 SECTION THROUGH TYPE I, II, AND III RAMP RUN FOR TYPE A CURB CURB FLOW LINE� ��, �� 2• DETECTABLE WARNING AREA RONDVAY SURFACE 0° 2 3'-0' STD. q• M�N. LANDING a LANDIN EX. SIDEVALK �' 0.02 0.02 �,1 0.02 SECTION THR�UGH TYPE I, II, AND III RAMP RUN FOR TYPE B CURB CURB FLOW LINE� �4' �� 2� DETECTAHLE WARNING AREA EX. SIDEWALK ROADWAY SURFACE m�� 6'-0' STD. 4' MIN. LANDING LANDIN a, I 0.02 0.0� w 0.02 1:12 SECTI�N THROUGH TYPE I, II, AND III RAMP RUN FOR TYPE D CURB 6' 3/4' RADIUS 6' � ��-VARIES�� 3' MIN. SEPARATELY CAST MONOLITHIC CAST SIDEWALK CURB OPTIONS N�TES: 1. FOR DETECTABLE SURFACE REQUIREMENTS AND OPTIONS, SEE STANDARD DETAIL-DETECTABLE WARNING SURFACES. 2. IF CONDITIONS D� NOT ALLOW TRANSIT[ON SL�PES ON TYPE I RAMPS, USE TYPE III RAMPS. 3. ALL EDGES ABUTTING CURB AND SIDEWALK SHALL HAVE 1/2' BITUMINOUS STR[P EXPANSIDN MATERIAL. 4. FOR CONDITIONS NOT SH�WN, SEE FDOT INDEX 0304; PAGES 1 OF 5 THRU 5 OF 5, WITH A REVISION DATE OF 07/24/02, OR LATER. 5. RAMPS SHALL BE PERPENDICULAR TO CURB/RDADWAY AND SHALL HE SLOPED IN ONE D[RECTION ONLY. 6. RAMP WIDTH MAY BE REDUCED TO 3' WIDE, IN RESTRICTED CONDITIONS, WHEN APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER. SWB 06/03 SWB 06/04 SWB 03/06 SWB 09/07 TYPE I, II, AND III SIDEWALK CURB RAMP DETAIL MARCH 1993 S20-23 4' TYPICAL 4' TYPICAL 4' TYPICAL > > > N N N RUNNING BOND PATTERN HERRINGBONE PATTERN PARQUET PATTERN BRICK DETECTABLE WARNING PATTERNS SEE NDTES 3,4,AND 5 4' MINIMUM OR /� DDITIONAL PANELS AS FULL RAMP WIDTH __ ./ REQUIRED, TYP. � __" � � N ss`si � � s°s°sti (24'x48' UNIT SHOWN) CAST IN PLACE DETECTABLE WARNING SURFACE TILE SEE NOTE 6 �AS PER MATERIAL AND L�CATION 00000000000000000000000o TRUNCATED DOME,SEE DETAIL 00000000000000000000000�y J OOOOOD000000000000000040 U DO0000000000000000000000 000000000000000000000000 0 0o VARIES� 0.9' MIN. T❑ l.4' MAX. a o00000000000000000000000 000 _�1.6' MIN, TO 2.4' MAX. DIA., TOP DIA. TO BE 50% MIN. T o00000000000000000000000 00o TD 65% OF THE BASE DIA. �- o00000000000000000000000 0 00000000000000000000000o INTEGRAL D�ME iu o00000000000000000 000o i I' S 2' TYP. 000000000000000000 0000 eoceecceoocecoeeucooccec 0.2', TYPICAL DOME PATTERN SHALL BE IN-LINC� ��,6' MIN. T❑ 2.4' MAX. WITH DIRECTION OF TRAVEL TYPICAL PLAN VIEW TRUNCATED DOME DETECTABLE WARNING PATTERN AND SURFACE TYPES N�TES� 1. CURB RAMP DETECTABLE WARNING SURFACES SHALL EXTEND THE FULL WIDTH �F THE RAMP. DETECTABLE WARNING SUR- FACE SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED HY TEXTURING A TRUNCATED DOME PATTERN IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF A.D.A. STANDARDS FOR ACCESSIBLE DESIGN, A.D.A. ACCESSIHILITY GUIDELINES, SECTI�N 4.29.2, SEE DETAIL ABOVE. THE TRANSITION SLOPES ARE N�T T❑ HAVE DETECTABLE WARNINGS. 2. DETECTABLE WARNING SURFACES SHALL CONTRAST VISUALLY WITH ADJACENT WALKING SURFACES, EITHER LIGHT-ON-DARK OR DARK-ON-LIGHT. COLOR AND DOME CONFIGURATION SHALL BE CONSISTENT AT EACH RAMP. 3. DETECTABLE WARNING PAVERS SHALL CONFORM TO ASTM: C 902 'PEDESTRIAN AND LIGHT TRAFFIC PAVING BRICK'. 4. DETECTABLE WARNING PAVERS SHALL HE ON 1' SAND BED COMPACTED, OVER NATIVE SOIL COMPACTED TO 96% OF MAXIMUM DENSITY. 5. DETECTABLE WARNING PAVERS SHALL BE AS MANUFACTURED BY PINE HALL BRICK �R EQUAL. 6, CAST IN PLACE DETECTABLE WARNING SURFACE TILE SHALL BE AS MANUFACTURED HY ARMOR-TILE OR E�UAL. (PART N0, ADA-C-2448, W/ DETECTABLE WARNING SURFACE TILE [N LINE) 7. METHODS OR PRODUCTS USED TO FORM DETECTABLE WARNINGS IN WET CONCRETE WILL NOT BE PERMITTED. 8. ALL MATERIALS SHALL BE INSTALLED AS PER THESE C�NDITIONS AND THOSE OF THE MANUFACTURES REQUIREMENTS. SWB 03/06 SWB 09/07 RING AND COVER ASSEMBLY� STANDARD� UPT❑ 5 BRICK� COURSES W/ 3/4' PLASTER COATING CROWN OF LATERAL SEWER T❑ MATCH- ❑R BE AB�VE CROWN ❑F TRUNK SEWER PIPE CONNECTION-STANDARD DETAIL� FIBERGLASS MANHOLE SCHEDULES LATERAL SEWER PIP 2-4'x 1-5/8'C CHANNEL SUPPORTS � ATTACHED T❑ THE BOTTOM AND SIDE WALLS, F�R DEPTHS GREATER THAN 10' COMPACTED SUBGRADE, OR��_� 4' CONCRETE MAT, �R 6' COURSE AGGREGATE, AS �� M.H. DIA. � � ❑RDERED BASE WIDTH TYPICAL SECTI❑N VIEW BASE WIDTH TYP. EACH SIDE ;CESS DIA DETECTABLE WARNING SUR�ACES DETAIL R=24' 2-1/2' ANTI-FL�TATION F JUNE 2003 SZO-24 SEE SEALING DETAIL-SEE STANDARD DETAIL-FIBERGLASS MANHOLE SCHEDULES � W �U 7 Z ia J = _ � OPTI�N: UPTO 5 PRECAST � CONCRETE GRADE RINGS W/ f Q N Q 3/4' PLASTER COATING � Q �� 0 - WT-SEE STANDARD DETAIL- � a Z,7�, FIBERGLASS MANH�LE � Z � a SCHEDULES 'v a � f � BENCH SL�PE W J o �� a N � A � - � � BT-CAST-IN-PLACE BASE, SEE STANDARD DETAIL-FIBERGLASS MANHOLE SCHEDULES PLAN VIEW ANCHOR BOLT, F�R SIZES AND QUANTITY-SEE STANDARD DETAIL- FIBERGLASS MANHOLE SCHEDULES N❑TES� 1. SEE GENERAL NOTES, STANDARD DETAIL-SANITARY STRUCTURE NOTES AND TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS. 2. MANHOLE SHA�L BE CAST IN ONE PIECE i.e. BOTT�M, WA�L, TOP, NECK, AND ANTI-FL�TATION FLANGE, 3. BENCH AND INVERT'S SHALL BE CAST AFTER MANHOLE HAS BEEN SET AND ACCEPTED. SWB 06/02 SWB 03/06 SANITARY �IBERGLASS MANH�LE DETAIL JUNE 2001 S30-50 , � � � W O � Z �Q Z � � Z O � Z � a� Nw • z �Z • n a LL w � Z O W g � a�°o N � N = ' - � ♦ Z � � t� � Z � � Z N � � Z • ~ _ W �W � � ~ � v� J • � � � N � W 0 � d W OC � W �..i Z W C9 F � W G � W W � � � Z 1A � Q ti • W a; c9 a � G Z � W � Z p =0 J g y J� Z m� � S � �a � ♦ � � � J" oW E B#5936 �� M � Issue Date: 10/01/10 Revisions: � J a � W � W � � J � - � ��Flit� � ^ � W � O � O � � � � � O � � r � � aM 0 0 � � � � N O � a �'� w 0 ° °� � � � � � m aMo� O yQ � o a� � �" W a � � �� ti�� - r�� THIS DRAWING IS AN INSTRUMENT OF SERVICE AND .�FiA�L J�tvYAlta �Pi�.PRbPF,R1Y C?f� THE ENGINEER, AND SHALL NOT BE REPRODUCED, PUB�IS�D.Of�USED IN R�IY WQT. �JITHP�UT THE CONSENT OF THE ENGINEER. «� v ��,3 �° - t� + ��-� ��_ _ � �_�.�r� �J �,� ltL� ` p,� LARRY D. HOUSEL, P•;�:^�#1�483�'� M��; -��..�2'�1� ; ■ COPIES OF THESE PLANS ARE NQ.T �a� E� '` �`� ` EMBOSSED WITH THE SIGNING EN%i1�lEER �� EA�'j ` . '� �ti�� _ ►� - - t� . r�.�'r.� ... . � . � ! TYPICAL RING PLAN � CLEAR ❑PENING SEE APPLICABLE SECTION A-A PICK HOLE B S��au SEwfR B � cmr ar � ST. PBfSR4BUBG FC ORIO P TYPICAL COVER PLAN TYPE A-2234' LABEL PER APPLICATION, TYPE B-34y8' ie; SANITARY SEWER OR WATER TYPE C-22 y' TYPE D-341B• TYPE E-25 �8' F,P'��.� TYPE A-20�'8' I ( TYPE B,C AND D-13�' �yeQ�'t��' TYPE B-32' TYPE E-�' � �,�-le TYPE E-24' rMACHINED SURFACES Q I SECTI❑N 'B-B' TYPE C-26S�' z TYPE A-36' TYPE B-4Q�' TYPE E-34" MANH❑LE APPLICATI❑N SECTI❑N 'A-A' TYPE D-40 i�' a U TYPE C-20 3� • W a MACHINED TYPE D-32 �i• � SURFACE I SLAB APPLICATI❑N SECTI❑N 'A-A' S C H E D U L E RING & C�VER TYPE RING WEIGHT - LBS C�VER WEIGHT - LB TOTAL WEIGHT - LBS A: 485 240 130 370 B� 655 230 260 490 C: 1110 90 105 195 D� 1120 170 260 430 E� 576 215 140 355 N�TES� 1. RING & COVER TYPES ARE U.S. FOUNDRY, FOR REFERENCE ONLY. 2. ALL SURFACES �F THE RING & C�VER WHICH C�NTACT EACH ❑THER SHALL BE MACHINED. 3. TYPE(S) A AND C RING & COVER IS FOR ST�RM PIPES UPT❑ 24" DIA, UNLESS �THERWISE NOTED. 4. TYPE(S) B AND D RING & COVER IS F�R STORM PIPES 27' DIA. AND LARGER. 5. TYPE B RING & COVER IS F�R SANITARY PIPES 21' DIA. AND LARGER. 6. TYPE E RING & C�VER IS FOR SANITARY PIPES UP TO 18' DIA. SWB 09/96 SWB 06/98 SWB 09/00 e v��e� e�� y� � s�' G 3' Tronsition NOTE; Wings only, if ,e� t�o o� �+ Side Slo as Re wre. Qo �y � ��r l�' E �.e�sr A d� A Back of Curb � � Non-slip surfaca require- : PLAN VIEW MANH❑LE RING AND COVER CASTING DETAIL MARCH 1993 S10-50 Remove Curb if Existing Exist Conc Drive Max Slope �1" �" �0 Max Slope t , . � e 4„ " .'.e_ . : a . ' . 4., 1/2'� Exp, Joint 1/2" Exp. Joint 6'" TYPICAL DRIVEWAY CROSS SECTION Remove Back of Curb on State or Verticol Curbs with a vertical Saw cut or Remove entire Curb and Replace os Port of Sidewalk Ramp. Modified and Vailey Gutter Curbs join exist bock of curb 12�� Textured Surface � �� 0 Max Slope �.� - : : ..: . . ' � , ' Remove to an �1/2" Expansion Joint even joint or sawcut SECTION A-A NOTES: 1. Provide tooled joints ot distances motching the width. Also ploce expansion joints at driveways. 2. If some physical obstruction exists which prevents the placing of sidewalks as shown, contact the Engineering Division for alternate locotion. 3. Wooden and other spacers will not be permitted in sidewalks or driveways. 4, No cootings of any kind will be permitted on concrete 6idewalks or driveways without specific approvol of the City Engineer. 5. All concrete shall be 3000 psi min. � 28 d0ys, with fiber mesh reinforcing. 6. Concrete surfoce to be light broom finish. 7. Concrete driveway construction shall be 6" thick w 6x6/10x70 welded wire mesh reinforcement. s g � c s a N � � O j wv � o 0 � Q _ _ o � N H 4� Min Residential Street 1� Cit R/W R 5� Min Arterial Street 2' County R/W 1/4�� per Foot _� Back of Curb 3000 psi conc 4" thick. Constr. 6° thick at driveways with 6x6 #1� welded wire mesh. See note 7. SECTION B-B 8. Ramps shall have a taciile surface, textured to a depth not exceeding 1/8" by use of tamp or roller in conformanca with requiremants of FDOT Roadway ond Traffic Dasiqn Standards, Detail 304 or most recent modifications. N❑TES �OR STORM STRUCTURES 1. ALL PIPE STUBS FROM STRUCTURES F�R FUTURE C�NNECTIONS, SHALL BE INSTALLED WITH REMOVABLE WATERTIGHT PLUGS, PLACED FR�M WITHIN THE STRUCTURE. 2. F�R APPLICABLE RING AND COVER, SEE STANDARD DETAIL-MANHOLE RING AND C❑VER CASTING. 3. STORM STRUCTURES SHALL NOT HAVE OUTSIDE DROP CONNECTIONS. 4. PROVIDE MINIMUM 8' SOLID WALL BETWEEN ALL ❑PENINGS F❑R PIPES. SEAL BETWEEN PIPE AND STRUCTURE WJITH N�N SHRINK GR❑UT. 5. ALL BRICK �HALL BE CONCRETE ❑R CLAY BRICK AND SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM 3/4' CEMENT PLASTER CDATING ❑N ALL SURFACES. 6, BENCH SHALL SLOPE @ 1�1� MINIMUM. 7, PRECAST ANID CAST-IN-PLACE MANHOLES, CATCH BASINS, AND GRATE INLETS ARE DESIGNED FOR A MAXIMUM DEP'TH ❑F 12 FEET, STRUCTURES IN EXCESS ❑F 12 FEET, AS MEASURED FR�M THE FINISHED GRADE T❑ THE INSIDE ❑F THE BASE SLAB, SHALL REQUIRE VERIFICATION ❑F THE STRUCTURAL DESIGN AND SPECIFIC MODIFICATIONS T❑ THE REINFORCING REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEPTH REQUIRED. 8. PRIOR T❑ PRECASTING STRUCTURES THE PRECASTER SHALL SUBMIT SITE SPECIFIC INDIVIDUAL SHOP DRAWINGS FmR APPR❑VAL, SH❑P DRAWINGS SUBMITTED F❑R N❑N-STANDARD STRUCTURES ❑R STRUCTURES THAT DEVIATE FR�M THE STANDARD DETAILS MUST BE DESIGNED AND CERTIFIED BY A REGISTERED FLORIDA PROFESSI�NAL ENGINEER. 9. PRECAST MAMIHOLES SHALL CONSIST ❑F A LIMITED NUMBER �F SECTIONS, AS APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER. 10. ALL PRECASL STRUCTURES SHALL HAVE AN INTEGRAL FL�❑R AND BASE RISER SECTIDN. 11. SEE STANDARD DETAIL-PRECAST STRUCTURE JOINT ASSEMBLY AND STRUCTURE SEALING. 12. ALL EXPOSED EDGES T❑ HAVE 3/4' CHAMFER. 13. ALL REINF❑R!CING STEEL SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM 2' CDNCRETE C�VER, UNLESS N�TED ELSEWHERE, 14, ADDITIONAL IREINF�RCEMENT IS REQUIRED IN ALL TYPE CATCH BASIN WALLS, GRATE INLETS, AND TYPE II, III, IV, AND TYPE V MANHOLE WALLS WITH ❑PENINGS FOR PIPE ❑R CULVERT. THE VERTICAL AND HORIZ❑NTAL WALL REINFORCEMENT DISPLACED DUE T❑ ❑PENINGS SHALL BE REPLACED WITH ADDITI�NAL REINFORCEMENT BARS ABOVE, BELOW, AND ❑N BOTH SIDES ❑F ❑PENING, EQUAL IN AREA T� TH❑SE DISPLACED.fl2EPLACEMENT REINF❑RCEMENT SHALL BE PLACED WITH 3' CLEARANCE T❑ THE EDGES �F ❑PENINGS. SWB SWB SWB SWB 06/' O1 06/'02 06/ 04 03A06 ST❑RM STRUCTURE N�TES T_ fHANDICAPPED SIGN SEE INDD( N0. 119 CONC. WALK RAMP DOWN SEE INDEX N0. 7 6" N7DE 7RAFFIC BLUE S7RIPE (iYPICAL) TRAfFIC WHITE O0 'p� + (TlPICAOI,E Y (rraicu) MARCH 1993 S40- 1 CONC. WALK a � �6" WIDE TRAFFIC WHI?E STRIPE (TfPICAL) V sp. NOTE: All pavement markings to be thermoplastic. TYPICA� SING�E HANDICAPPED STALL CITY INDEX N0. 118; 1❑F 2 N.T.S. HANDICAPPED SIGN$ �SEE INDIX N0. 719 � CONC. WALK I SEEINDEX O 10B) I SEE NDE% N0. iD9l CONC. WALK � TRAfFtC WHITE + 6� STRp(E o (rrnicu) � �- 5 -0" s� 1 ,Z,_o�� 5�-0• 1 12._0• �" (TPICAL��I 1 29•_0• r A. PARKING ANGLE CDEGREES) B, STALL WIDTH CFEET) C, STALL TD CURB CFEET> D. AISLE WIDTH <FEET) E. CURB LENGTH CFEET> F, MIN. OVERALL D�UBLE ROW WITH AISLE BETWEEN (FEET) STANDARD PARKING STALL CITY INDEX N0. 120; 1 �F 1 N.T.S. BLUE 6" N7DE iRAFFIC WHITE smi� (rrnicn�) NOTES: 1) ALL PARKING SPACE STRIPING TO BE WHITE IN COLOR. 2) PARKING FACILITIES WITH 500 OR MORE PARKING SPACES SHALL BE IN THERMOPLASTIC. 3) ALL CITY OF CLEARWATER PR�DJECTS SHALL BE IN THERMOPLASTIC. � � N � i u� � � 2-i/2' min - 7-3/4' - TYPE A #3 Ba Typica C❑NCRETE T❑ BE 3,000 PSI,`WITH FIBER MESH REINFORCING. � � 2' Min N i IA N N III � � 1 ' I II N❑TES� � • I II • 1 BACKL STOPS T❑ BE PLACED 2' � AS SHOWN ABOVE. CENTERED IN THE � PARKING STALL 2. WHEEL STOPS CAN BE PAINTED IN r 7_1�2• #3 Bar A C❑NTRASTING C❑L�R SUCH AS � TYPE C Typical GRAY, YELL❑W OR BLACK. BLUE SHALL BE USED F❑R WHEEL STOPS REINFORCED CmNCRETE CITY INDEX N0. 117; 1❑F 1 N.T.S. HANDICAP PARKING STALLS. ` � r � w ° oz A Z � � �� O W,_, �Z � a��w � Z �Z • � %: � haLLw � Z W O z � � � '-� /� S � N 2 v� y M� ♦ O t9 � � Z Z � f� � � O :': _ �++ � W oC Z ~ F'- C7 . . v� J • � � � � � y J W � � � O d W � � W V Z W C9 � � W C � W W � t,7 � Z �t! � � ti � W a M c� `s � C z � W� � O Z J � y J� z m� � • �Q . � y� J Li a E B#5936 �� M � Issue Date: Revisions: No. Date 1 4/12/12 � 4/30/12 � J � a � W 0 W � � J � - C.� �Satliele•_�.. / / ``, THIS DRAWING IS AN INSTRUMENT OF SERVICE AND �?IA6L �MA �H P.�'ER�sOF THE ENGINEER, AND SHALL NOT BE REPRODUCED, PUBLd�H�6 ��I�ANy°�AY WI�HOUT THE CONSENT OF THE ENGWEER. ��G' :� . k �' '^� » �p 1s►g�� -� � _ ��.� �� I�.� � d ^ ' y x D. HOUSEL,� �`�14�� `�� COPIES OF THESE PLANS ARE%N{�'i) Vi,'Li[�F` �N��, i,T� ` X ti EMBOSSED WITH THE SIGNING �JJZ'rrU�,€k�S•SERL'�. � ' �� I � � n - ♦ f��a.<<ti ° 10/01 /10 Description Per DRC Per CITY �� W � O � O � � � � � O � � � � 0 ao 0 �� N O � a �� 0 ° °� � c � � �m aM=� O y� � � o y� � �" W a O°�J v � �� ■ I TT A RO C R T YARD b � 1�� R 443 EAST SHORE DRIVE CLEAR WA TER BEACH, FLORIDA 33767 COLOR SAMPLES PAINT & COLOR SCHEDUiE 1 OLYYPIC - PYS MKITE 2 OLYYPIC - PYS 678 3 OLYYPIC - PYS 56B 4 OLYYPIC - PYS 574 5 OLYYPIC - PYS 726 #3 PMS - 568 #2 PMS - 678 #4 PMS - 574 #5 PMS - 726 � � � � w z�'-o° . 98'-11" � — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — I � STRUCTU29L GLASS AWNING CORAL STONE TiYO SIDED � WATER FALL — - ------- -, DSTL�OTDTA 71T I 26G �-U�� 27'-3" i 97'-f0•• 21'-0" GENERAL NOTES: 1. THIS PROJEGT SHALL COMPLY 1PITli ALL CODES REGARDING FIRE' ORDINANCE N0. 7617-06 REGiTLATlONS PRIOR TO CDB 2. THIS PROJECT SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE 1PITH NFPA 72 AND NFPA 1 D 1. PRIOR TO CDB 8. THIS PROJECT SHALL B.E IN ACCORDANCE IIITH NFPA 88A, 2007 PRIOR TO CDB 4. THIS PROJECT SFIALL COMPLY �ITS ALL CODES REGARDING NFPA-96, 2008 Rls'GULATIONS PRIOR TO CDB � NORTH SCALE = 3/32" = 1'-0" Revisions Date By Revised 4-13-12 B.P. Revised 4-30-12 B.P. Revised 5-15-12 B.P. . U � � � �� • U i Q � C� O � � � � i V � � � � C� O � � � � � .� C � N �� N U L � � 0 � � 4— L M � � o M r' U c°� Ri ~ � c � � � � � �1 �. � � ti v � M (V ,cA c� Q X � ti tn N � O U o �' Om ��O � U O Q � � � � � � V V � L N� L.L � � � a� C d" U cn � j � O � � ~ � � � a` _ . r� t'a � :�".� . , . �,. rr� i T' �'t� � �� Z ;: , \ : 1 �' ��' �, � � ':_ "' ��` �r� 'f� L� �� ,, �� c'�- r i ',ti yf� �r l c� .\.: ,� :�� ... � � � � � ��\ � r�i � � O � � � � � � � � 0 � � � � W � �" �" ti � ' J � � O � �rr^ � W �' W � � � � � � � U�� - Z� , W � �. d 0 �' �� ,� . �l�f �. �`.� Drawn B.P. Check S.J.S. Date 4-30-12 Scale AS NOTED Job No 00101-09 Sheet: � � � � F-+-�1 � \ � � � � � \ � W � \ � � � � W � � �$, 4X`{ � � � R � i 9RR'_ 9" NORTH SCALE = 3/32" _ >'-0" Revisions Date gy Revised 4-13-12 B.P. Revised 4-30-12 B.P. Revised 5-15-12 B.P. � � 0 U � � L � � � � L / ti � � N � � V � � M � U c°� � (0 C6 ~ � � N Q � ¢ � � � � � a�i � C!� O LL I�' " � C'� N. cl? c� Q }+ X� ti U? N N � p V o °�,' _ C, m N � o° �o O p�mVo�� a� � L � � � � .� c � L L U � � � � � c a� � � C d" U cn i i •� ti � � U � � ~ tn C � � � ` � � � O � � � � ;�`�� F� ;.� �E � k.) �� j � � "� ;� � P'r � t� ' � � ��; 4' •r� ,*�'�i1 � �' � ° `, �ti. � � � � � �W �� O � � � � � � � � � 0 � � � � � �' ✓ � � l� � �` J � � � O � ` w V �M �'il Lw� C� � � � � � � Q �- ��Q � � .it� � �� ' , '� �s � �' X` : t— r � .� � � � � �t � �„�' '� _ �7 , 0 �.p� �° � ),�t t ; � � 4 ` � � V9tij �� qA V� �b� ` . ,,. - � . . . _� i,: � _ Drawn B.P• Check S.J.S. Date 4-30-12 Scale AS NOTED Job No 00101-09 Sheet: M � � � � W � � � � � �� Q v � a � � ^ o � 0 0 � � 5'-0" 21'-0•• ROOM KING SOFA ROOM KING SOFA ��°j n o_� � �, ♦ 'II • � , �) � � III • ' � �O ■■ � '--�_ __ __ __ �— �� s:� �• � • �T��I�■r I �,�'�¶ i � � �� , I ^�� II / I `_�I � r ►� !�r . �'. � 0 .; �� _ �� ,� � _ � t� . . ■ " � _.. � o � �� i � 'II �� . . ' I u _ II SUITE KING SOFA 46 �-0" � SUITE DBL. QUEEN In I I�.�.� . I ' � � � � `-' RODM DBL. QUEEN �� II � 41 \ � � � �; ,�'I� I DBL. QZIEEN RODM MECH/ CHEM. SUPPLY ENGINEERIN MAINT OFFICE � zss'-o" 51'-0" 30'-0" �------------------------�, �� , . , � -------- ------- ------- � � ------ ------- -------- � i ii`� �'ii i ii � � ii II �� II i ii } _ � ii i I i i i .'� CABANAS `� i i i i��'/ \�� i i ,' ` i ------�__________�______--� i - � ------ \�I CDURTYARD ��— _ . — � u� �16;a�1 =1 - [co�i �d'-�Q � I� II U� E � '� I� � �_ -- • __._.. � y - ,, � -- � = � r � � CI �s�� . ( ►r' '� !'!1''I • � �� - __ �.-�i :� � ' _ _:3i �-i.--'' ��:-r` , :-_. �� __ I�'�N 'I� �� ,� ��,�� __ ....., ; ==� I�I __ �i[�= `� 0�0 � °!' i� : :: , ii��i��i�� u��r� ��r��i��i��; ._,, ;� �; � - 0 � 1�,� Ili� ��II I�I ��__ �1N �,,,,�,,,,,,,,,,,,,,�,,,�,,,,,,,,,, „�,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,o �� _`.� \� � � iiimiiimiimiiiimiiiiimmmimmumi diimiiiiiiiiimiiiiii�iimiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii �� ;;;� I �I . �,h IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII - �,,, _ : ... .... . . .... .. ........ :_ : _ . � -- - ..-..- :....... . . .. .. . ............. .:.......:....:.......... _........... iiiummiiiiiiiuuiumVulfiiuiiiuiiiuullmmmiimiimiiiiir iimiiiiiiiillllitllilliil ��,�,,,��,� ��,�� — ---� � � � � � � � � �� o 0 i� INI�� i MEDIA , w�-�, PODS � � � , , , n n n , � � ' ' RECEPTION � � , , �� i �-------- � ; � � L��GE' � � I �___ ____J I - -_-_---_J L___ __-__-JI , � � �� , �� LJ LJ LJ L_______COMMUNAL � � � o ----------J TABLE � � r O RECEPTION - � % O � � � -- - COFF�E � �� 1 `' ^ �� , � LOCAL ARE�' � � ; � O \ RODM � LIBRARY' � � � KING SOFA � - ; , , :............._ .__._ ---......... � ' ; , ' � � LOUNGE � � � � � � FFIC� � � � o o ......_ � , � � .. � , � � � � � � 910'-0" ,.. ..- ELEV. ELEi ONE TWD B. 0. H. 37'-2.. i6'-0" 51'-0" COURTYARD �� I �, � , 'If , � d � � � A '�f �� _ � �i I __ - ��■�� ' � f�l : ; . .� •�i , �, �� -�� _� � �, -� , . I■ �� i � al � �� - -�� , ��;� _ � y ��\� ��; �/�t � � °:::::>:::::::::::::<<:::::::::::::::::::<:::::::::::>::::::::::::::::: i�� 7 In� In r� „ — — — - t� - ' _ I:—I:'I:' � � � /:1 !1 � � �� . y� y� , � ` � � SUITE DBL. QtTEEN n - , 'C � --� 46'-D" RODM `�' � DBL. QUEEN -- � //¶ �� II I � i� � � �, �� _� DBL. QUEEN �� ROOM .� i STORAGE �� ,�— —u� �� EXERCISE ROOM �� VENDING ,I—', ,I—'� �I��' �U�I �� ,.',I I�,',I �� i� � �� . ,�,_. ��,�,=.�� ,�.=.�,�� 11 1 ..,�►. IY"lo� �oi II�II_ , ":� �I , 'lll' Il'�I I�'"'�I -�:. .'� � - - - �=�� fOB'-f0„ RODM KING SOFA . �'��,V i u �� , � -t� II � �� I �� 21'-0•' RDOM KING SOFA ROOM KING SOFA i r � �, � � I � u��i _ __ � li�� o r— � � ,� ri � � � ��sm�s�xma�aama��m� �' � c � ... � �----- f�ORTH SCALE = 3/32" = 1'-0" �_ SUITE KING SOFA �� Revisions Date By Revised 4-13-12 B.P. Revised 4-30-12 B.P. Revised 5-15-12 B.P. C � O c� � � � � � � � i V .� ti N � � �� M � U c°� C U� � N � � � � � � i � N � Q O� �� /1 U Q� M N .N `� ¢` �� i� � � � N f� � 0 V � � O m � O � o _ � � Omv� Q � L � �-� �� U V � � � � � � � a� � .� � � U c� i i •� � � � U � �r'cn� � � � Cf� � Q � � �;� Q L �;�. �*.�. � ,'?�, j � . ,`�• . � C�� - U o0 � , � s .� i' tf z'� � •.. �� t� r., �'1— W d' , k., �. rs• a_ r.. y . , {; �:� £# �/r� 3 r�''i Y� r^ � Y v� � � }- s , � ,:a � p .:� �;,1 1 : rr � ::�f , '` ,t+} `�� ^ y z �,� 5,:� . . ��,tfr• l�� ',-�, '��' ' , r • «d��' ,;; ' �' � C� o � ~~ C� � � � �� ~ � � Q � � O �� ,� Q� �� Q0� � �T� W �� 1 (� � ��w � � � � � � CTl � � "� � Q � W � � V Drawn B.P. Check S.J.S. Date 4-30-12 Scale AS NOTED Job No 00101-09 Sheet: �+1 � � � W � � � � � � � � � F-+.� �-d O � 'v � cc � � zss'-o�� NORTH SCALE = 3/32" = 1'-0" Revisions Date By Revised 4-13-12 B.P. Revised 4-30-12 B. P. C � O U � � � � � � � � cc� � .� M � V o C U � � N � � � � •L � � � � 0 � � � U � M N .� N a � X � ti N N �n CCS � V o � _ V m N � o° -o � � � p_mUo � Q �' � Q � `� U V L U � � � � � � � a� � � � d' U cn i i -� ti � O U � � ~ tn C �� 0 � � � � J��`'a ��4 � �" ,� - t ; .� . - ��J�. �;",•°�; r, �, : �.,r� :.� ' Z �i y ,:3 ; Cfj - `,'!�g' W : � ;,;• � " � '� . � � � x � � i � .:.! 4� ej�� Yi';� � �� t - �s � - 4 ��:` . ' :, �_ ,,, w � � � � �W � � � 0 � �� 0 � � � � w � � � � � � � � � 0 � �� w � w � � � � � � �, Drawn B.P. Check S.J.S. Date 4-30-12 Scale AS NOTED Job No 00101-09 Sheet: ' . . N � � w � w � � w � 0 � � " .� �'_ ;�� ,�`�� F= `. �$ � � T. D. PARAPET � _ MEAN EL. 83'-6� � T.O. FLAT ROOF MEAN EL. 76'-0" oa (NOT TO EXCEED 80'-0") _ 0 I 0 HOTEL LEVEL SEVEN � _ � MEAN EL. 66'-0" 0 i 0 HOTEL LEVEL SIX � MEAN EL. 56'-0" 0 0 R HDTEL LEVEL FIVE MEAN EL. 46'-0" o o � � 0 � HOTEL LEVEL FOUR MEAN EL. 36'-�" 0 0 GARAGE LEVEL THREE R ME.4N EL. 26'-0" 0 0 GARAGE LEVEL TW(� MEAN EL. 16'-D" 0 B.F.E. � � EL. 11'-0„ 0 GARAGE LEVEL ONE CD EL. 5'- 0 " MII� POINT ELEV. EQUIP. RM. � MEAN EL. 9>'-�" � MID POINT OF STAIR SHAFT� MEAN EL. 87'-6" . �' �� ''� �,-:'. .�. �.k.v `�._�. �� , �,; ,.... �``.,..�>�,_:' \ ; �; �. ?•;` \ ,� __:: -, •;: O _ L � PAINT & COLOR SCHEDtTLE 1 OLYMPIC — PMS WHITE 2 OLYMPIC — PMS 678 3 OLYMPIC — PMS 5s8 4 OLY��IC — PMS 574 4 OLYMPIC — PMS 726 � . u � � NOTE: ALL SIGNS ARE FOR ILLUSTRATI[�E PtIRP�SES ONLY. � ��% �� % , � �.� �/�.�� DECORATIVE WHITE ALUM. 2'x2' TRANSPARENT GRID GRILL-TYP. COURTYARD by �arriott � CEMENT PLASTER FACTORY FINISH CEMENT PLASTER S.S. METAL RODF FINISH � ALUMIN�M RAILIN� - � FINISH � C�L�R -#4 COLOR - #3 (TYP.) COLOR - #1 COLOR - #2 POOL DgClt L1�'Yh'L — -�-�- � x��-� - STRUCTURAL GLASS Afl'NING _ _ PEDESTRIAN _ _ ENTRY _"�' "- j ->� '`'- ,��_ ��` �,` CORAL STONE TWO SIDED WATER FALL SCALE = 3/32" = 1'-0" - ,,} - , � � � ,, ....s,.;._.,:,, ..>� ' 3 � % 0 :i'��..!;:�.::%`��j::'::��' ,:;�. .'.- ��",�'..',�`'��.:'.i;,�;,`�`��•;,,'-�i•��:�..':,!::,':f,�,.f '._:::.::-�'`�;':-'- �:�:: �`:":`. ,".'.',' .'.=;.": _� _ ` �i..•:%;' ': ': ; :. __ -. ,.,:-.: ; ;: ;..;: �PEN TO GARAGE :::'• .�:- ��f''��%'%'��' . CE1bfENT PLASTER FINISH COLOR - #3 RAISED RECTANGULAR CEMENT PLASTER DETAIL - COLOR # f FLORIDA CORAL STONE ELEMENT COL�R #5 TRELLIS ABOVE W/ MESH SCREEN @ 24' ON TRASH ENCL 0 S iTRE EXTERIDI� FINIShTES AND OPENINGS PERCENTAGES STUDY EAST ELEYATION l�ls'ST ELEVATION NORTB ELEVATION SOUTE ELEYATION GIAZINC: 25% GLAZING: 27% GLAZING: 22x GLAZING: 227L RAILINIGS: 159: RAILINCS: f8X RAILINGS: 149. ItAILINGS: 14� OPBNIIWGS: 119. OPENINGS: 14X OPENINGS: f7X OPENINGS: 15X ARCH. .DET: 149: ARCE. DET: f5% ARCS. DET: !2y ARCE. DET: 12% TOTAL: 659. TOTAL: 74X TOTAL: 65x TOTAL: 637G 0 Q � Revisions Date By Revised 4-13-12 B. P. Revised 4-30-12 B.P. Revised 5-15-12 B.P. . C � O U � � i � � � � � V .0 ti N � � �� M � U c°� � .� t� (I3 ~ � c � �- � � � � � � 0 � � � s �/� U � M N ,N N Q �--� X � I` tA N � CLS p V o .�"' _ C, m N � o° .o � � � �mV� � v� � � � � � Q �' V Q L � U � � � � (Li c°�i � � L a C� V � � � � i i -- ti � � U a � ~ fA � � � C!� � � '�� , 'P� sJ ,,�,� 7 � . . �'i �)� . ' r...� �_,. yj . , , � c;' �.� z •�; �" � ;' ��; � w�: , J� � � ,� � , � �` , ,� ,, t � 3 �� g � � p. � � � �� O � � , �, ; ,,, • s� �'! Z �, �, ;� � �, w Q� , .. �, �; - r. � � �. �r, � `� > s ��Ir,.F , , � �� , ,,:.(`� d/� . . '..�- YJ �� . � � � �� ' ✓ � � � � �� Q � � 0 �w� �4�� o� �� w �� w �� L � ^\ � 1'� M � `' J �rY, O � �-�I � � V Drawn B.P. Check S.J.S. Date 4-30-12 Scale NONE Job No 00101-09 � Sheet: � 0 F�� ,W � � � `� 1 � � �'EMENT PLASTER J FINISH COLOR - #3 RAISED REG'TANGULAR CEMENT PLASTER DETAIL - COLOR # 1 FLORIDA CORAL STON� ELEMENT COLOR #5 �EMENT PLASTER � FINISH L'OLOR - #2 LOUVERED SUNSHADES � I � � W . � S.S. METAL ROOF FACTORY FINISH CEMENT P�ASTER CEMENT PLASTER COLOR -#4 ALUMINUM RAILING - FINISH FINISH (TYP.) COLOR - # 1 COLOR - #.2 COL�R - #3 ��r.�� , ,�n !�r1r�f�11�1r�rlri1�flr�ri ��r�llf��rlit��r�r�f`Il��ri IIII1111111l,i�llll I�IlIIlGlll�llil nn :f, � F 111111lllllllllli illllll'Ihll�l��ll'llll`I � . :x � �::., n �.. f n Ilillllllllllilll! iIIIlil�lilllliili C�URTYARD by �Sr'110tt � � � � � � % ' �' �%��'" �% .� �� %�� PAINT �c COL OR S CHED ULE 1 OLYMPIC — PMS iVHITE 2 OLYMPIC — PMS 678 3 OLYMPIC — PMS 568 4 OLYMP�C — PMS 574 4 OLYMPIC — PMS 726 RAISED RECTANGULAR CEMENT PLASTER DETAIL - CDLOR #2 i NOTE: �1LL SIGNS ARE � FOR ILLUSTRATIVE PURPOSES ONLY. _ MID POINT ELEV. EQUIP. Rtl1. � MEAN EL. 91'-6" MID POINT OF STAIR SHAFT MEA1V EL. 87'-6" nn }�� r,s: II�IIllllillllii I�illlillllll� nn . �� : . �i��rtri�i��,��r�f�� 1f��'f1��'1'1r1�,��,�„ � I��Illill��illlll I�ill�lll�l�lli�ll .: �� ' nn �. : :� � � '��r�f`fl'Ir�rlflf'11�1r� '��lf�rl�t,r��,r�r�r�.�t,rt,� ' Illll�llliilllll Illlllliill,Il�I! � - _ _ � DECORATIVE ALIIM. 2'x2' TRANSPAkENT GRID GRILL-TYP;. SCALE = 3/32" = 1'-0" EXTERIOR FINISHES AND OPENINGS PERCENTAGES STUDY EAST ELEVATIDN IIEST ELEVATION NORTH ELEVATION SOUTH ELEVATION GLAZING: 25% GIr1ZING: 27X GLdZING: 22X GLAZINC: 22X RAILINGS: 15X RAILINGS: f87 RAILINGS: 14X RAILINCS: f49. OPENINGS: 1 f% OPENINGS: f4X OPENINGS: 17X OPENINGS: f59: ARCH. DET: 14X ARCB. DET: 15X ARCX. DET: 12% ARCH. DET: 12R TOTAL: 65% TOTAiL: 749. TOTAL: 65� TOTAL: 689: T.O. PARAPET MEAN EL. 83'-6" � i � T.O. FLAT ROOF _ � ME.4N EL. 76'-D" (NOT TO EXCEED 80'-D") C I O HOTEL LEVEL SEV�'N � MEAN EL. 66'-0" 0 � HOTEL LEVEL SIX - - � MEAN EL. 56'-D" c � 0 H�TEL LEVEL FIVE � o MEAN EL. 46'-0'-� � � o � 0 HOTEL LEVEL FOUR MEAN EL. 36'-0" 0 ^ GARAGE LEVEL THREE MEAN EL. 26'-0" 0 ^ GARAGE LEVEL TWO MEAN EL. 16'-D" 0 0 � B.F.E. EL. 1 >'-0" 0 i �D GARAGE LEVEL ONE EL. 5'-0" Revisions Date By Revised 4-13-12 B. P. Revised 4 30-12 B.P. Revised 51512 B.P. � � — o •- U � � i � � � � i U � �`N� � � � M � U c°v C.� � � � � c i � N Q- � i � N � �• � � � � s �^ U � M N .� N Q �—r X � � fl1 c°�.� �n � � V o � �U m � E ° o � � 000 V oQ a ¢ � °_�Q� � ♦'' U U � i � � � � � � Q � V � � � � i i •— ti � � U � � ti cn� � � � � � ' Q - Q � � -; �, i `t s � �, f0°� � Z � , � ��,`•'� � a �' o �,�: _ €� ; , �� ' �� (n o ' �;' , , ,e S � �.,� � � '"'t `� ; t# �� F* w�� 1 4 ` "y " rr. �� . `'-:�f ° "�� =4!.�, � � � r,�"} 4.t* ' n ��.. � �, � � o � �w� � � � � � � �y � � � � � �o � � � � �� ,� o �, � � � �w � � � ��n w L vj � �� W� � � O � w � � � � � 0 � � � W � �'I � � `� 1 � � Drawn Bruce Poland Check Stephen Spencer Date 4-30-12 Scale NONE Job No 00101-09 / Sheet: � . . � . � . MI➢ POINT ELEV. EQUIP. RM.� MEAN EL. 91'-6" MID POINT OF STAIR SHAFT MEAN EL. 87'-6" _ `�` ; \�� \ a` �IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII� ��# n ��.�F n �F . � ...� �IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII� (Ililllllllllllll� �IIIIIIIilllllllllllllllll� � � � .� ' . ..��! � �/ i �„ t; � � / �: ;� : ; (IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII� (IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII� (IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII) � �\�' �...;..' �IIIIIIIIIIIIIIiII� � DECORATIVE ALUM. 2'x2' TRANSPARENT GRID GRILL-TYP. ��',�� Ff f�% �IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII� � }�� n (IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII) !�i � ��n ' �IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII� F �,'' �✓ � � / �:.n (!�� ) I i � _ T.O. PARAPET hiEAN EL. B3'-6" �o % T.O. FLAT ROOF IbfEAN �'L. 76'-0" (NOT TO EXCEEII 80'-0") 0 _ ^ HOTEL LEVEL SEVEN _ _ MEr-1N EL. 66'-0" RAISED RECTANGULAR CEMENT PLASTER � DETAIL 0 _ ^ HOTEL LEVEL SIX MEAN EL. 56'-0" FLORIDA C'ORt�L STONE � ELEMENT o COLOR #5 HOTEL LEVEL FIVE o MEAN EL. 46'-0" � �o � 0 HOTEL LEVEL FO UR MEAN EL. 36'-0" 0 � 0 _ _ ^ GARAGE LEVEL THREE _ MEAN EL. 26'-0" 0 � GARAGE LEVEL TWO MEAN EL. >6'-0" S.S. 111ETAL RDOF 0 COLOR - #4 � - - � B.F.E. _ EL. 11 '- 0" 0 CD GARAGE LEVEL ONE EL. 5'- D " EXTERIOR FINISHES AND OPENINGS PERCENTAGES STUDY EAST lLEPATION IIEST ELIs'YATION NQRTH ELEVATION SOUTA ELEYATION GLAZING: 25X GLAZING: 27% GLAZING: 22X CLAZING: 22x RAILINGS: 1SX RAILINGS: 18% RAILINGS: f4% ItAILINGS: 147G OPENINCS: 1 f% OPENINGS: 149G OPENINGS: f 79G OPENINGS: 15X ARCX. DET: f4X ARCH. DET: f5x ARCE. DET: fYX ARCH. DET: f2X TOTAL: 65% TOTAL: 74� TOTAL: 657: TOTAL: 63T. PAINT c�c COL OR SCH�'D ULE > OLYMPIC — PMS WHITE' SCALE = 3/32" = 1'-0" 2 OLYMPIC — PMS 678 3 OLYMPIC — PMS 568 4 OLYMPIC — PMS 574 4 OLYMPIC — PMS 726 �MID POINT ELEV. EQUIP. RM. MEAN EL. 91'-6" MID POINT OF STAIR SHAFT MEAN EL. 87'-6" . n�:�� = .�_.n = nn = n� - ��IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII) (IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIiI�) H�IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII� (IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII'�� nn nn nn �IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII> �IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII> �IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII� n�:.� �� . n nn �IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII� �IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII> �!�IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII� nn t.�� .� nn �IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII> �IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII� ��ililllllllllllllllllll� SCALE = 3/32" = 1'—D" CEMENT PLASTER FINI SH COLOR - #3 S.S. METAL ROOF COLOR - #4 FACTORY FINISH ALUMINtIM R.4ILING - (TYP.) COLOR - # 1 S. S. METAL ROOF COLOR - #4 CEMENT PLASTER FINI SH COLOR - #2 Revisions Date By Revised 4-13-12 B.P. Revised 4-30=12 B.P. Revised 51512 B.P. � � — o U � � i � � � � � N � .� M � V o � � C6 (LT ~ � c � N Q � Q C� O � � °' � � � ti � � M N .U? N Q -�-r X � I`� (A N N � p V o °' _ C.� m � � o° .o � � �mVO�Q. � � � � � � �c � L U 0 �'' U � � � � � Q t� L � � � � O U � � ~ t� � �� Q _ � t� �� - , ,,,s" �. �,F � �y� �.� �'�'j ' � W � } . > >a : � � � � �., ; �:= o v� t,.+� . f A� �] �.. Q r I f . ;} j�~ �x� O ��, �e , ^� ,j,, z � , ,� : . R �l/.y - � � S u� �� I �:�`� ,� � 4� � � � � I O � �W� � � � � �� \� � _ ( 7 � �w �..� o� � � � r T, � � �M� �-�I � � � w � `� 1 � � � � � 1 T 1 � �M.,y � �' J � o�� I � 0 � � ;� '�, W � � � � � � O v 1 -V � � � 0 � Drawn Bruce Poland Check Stephen Spencer Date 4-30-12 Scale NONE Job No 00101-09 Sheet: NOR TH ELE VA TION MASSING sc�cs = i/sz" _ �'-o^ EAST ELE VA TION MASSING sr.eis = ��sz- = r�-n- W SOUTH WE►ST I►SOMETRIC MASSjNG SCALE = 1/16" = 1'-0" THIs' THEORETICAL MAXIMUM BUILDING ENYELOPE ABOYE 45' = 74.590 TOTAL BUILDING C.F. = 2, 020, 800 THE THEORETICAL M.AXIMUM B UILDING ENYELOPE ABOYE 45' = 1,505,496 C.F. 74.5% P ��/ 4 e Revisions Date By Revised 4-13-12 B.P. Revised 4-30-12 B.P. Revised 5-15-12 B.P. U � � V � � � � W � U � Q � CL� � U � � C!� � .� � � � N � U � � Q � O U L � t� L M � � U � � � � N Q . L ��.�. (n � � � O � N � � X � ~ � � O (� O � m = O Q U� � U a U � L � �- Qi C d' U ca ti c a� � ti � � � � 0 0 N U c � U � L I ` ', Q ' N N tli �U 0 � � � c � a� U C N Q � 0 'n ,Q fi . Q< r. ° �^ ',� � �. W ` , ' ,+ ,U;�p� � , :� � ,� t 1 � ;� �7 ! j , � F '3 r k ' �� y� ; � � # p� � YV 4 1 , a .; . 3 , F�; � t � � 0 �w � �� w �� 0 � �� M , O V � � � � � � � 0 � �� w � � C� � � � W � �, p�� w lt5 V/ �'� yd �. � � � �d Z� ,r w Q t ;, _ .� Y� j,T ,. � ��; ,�.�5�, y� � H � � ,� �"� � � � � � � � � F�� v 1 � �1 � Drawn Bruce Poland Check Stephen Spencer Date 4-30-12 Scale NONE Job No 00101-09 Sheet: - - T.O. PAMPK 1 � _ � YIdN f� r.o. iur nnur � rsex sa s. -o �ncr m excsro ea'-a'; _ , , COUR TYARD b ��A.RRIOTT Y 443 EAST SHORE DRI �E CLEAR WATER BEACH, FLORIDA 33767 Y(O POfNf 61LY. QQ(I/p RY J Y6.1N 64 !) -B --T- _ -- _ m,_ _ _.� -- ._ ' .'_._' _ ..__. . YIO Po!M Of STIfF siun �+on: .0 ncas �na � EAN 1'�R lLLUSTRA7/�d WNiCISts ONLi ---�__ . . ■! . ■ COURTY:�RD �:r�ii<at — ; _�� Q��'��,� !� . !.�.� _I ■ � ��I_ ��NI_I��e��l__i�i�■�I-•�--- �--nrcroearnr irxrra �cur s'�s' rx4vsr,uanr caro cRiu-rrr. ''�� PAlNT k COLOR SCHEDULE � I I OLYYPfC - ➢MS MHlTE � '; P . OLYXP/C - PM3 67B '� 3 � OLYYPIC - PYS 568 �� ♦ : OLYYPlC - ➢YS 5�1 �:� a i OLYYPlL - PYS 7Z8 �,___ oreN ta c.�tuce ' iL/YT6R /"` fdGfOR7 /1NISN - C616M Pl.ISTBP S.S. YdTAL F001 / Al1/YlNf/Y FAlLMC - FIMSN COiqp - /! - I] / (TYPI CtlLOA - I� . C�ULOR - IP � � � '_'_ � MOL O(CR flKt � . �� ■ �mo ��: _:: _:: � E 0 �� (V q �C M W C� � W �c�'v� E a � '� �LL�ffi � or�a�# mm=£�B � amc�8 € � �� t c a � W g`pa �Ng � � 0 � � ��J a a 7 � cerswr nusrax fi �° FlMISA ' � COLOF - i9 W 4 � RAlS60 A£CTANCUtA11 y�.. CLYE.YT PIdSf'LN ' OETIIl - COLAF �r �r�owau CORAL StON6 .-.-.-.�.. � �� i'i• ••�.. �'► ♦ •��, ��0'p�� ! T �.�i�i��i!�!.� �►�� , �, � ; , . � �4� � . �� I► _� ''� � �'�:-- � �� -.�J �� .,. i� .!�! zz, ,�, ,�.� s.�:- I �� i#'�� :� �'TI��y� ' WEST ELE VA TION CONCEPT __—..___�-_ �. _____— ' . � SCAI.£. ._ .? �32" . r' ..p.. BXTERlOR P7.VlSXE'S AND OPfNlNCS PdRCCN7AC6S STUDY � --r-- i ,c�sr ecrvlrrou +rsr cFav rnM ' �qp � � c�wxc� ux cuso+c rx dauwo- us � aun�.c� an I i � '�� wwxes� �n i wuwra� .n� xuwea: �ax I �urwvcs. iR � msnu�cs: r�x � arn.aas. �.a I� onswxsy� ,nc � aunvos �n ! � u Icx DsT: I ,Y[Ir. xf i ucx orr rM .. 10f � I.tA IOT ��i � fOT1L� 16% . IVML 443 EAST SHORE DR FLD2012-03008 FLD Courtyard by Marriott Zoning: Tourist Atlas #: 267A � O � � � Q�g �Qx �� qo� ��w �" � ¢ L� � 3 � C�'� � OV ,v�Q, � � ti� W � W � 0 > J W W 3 D�Ww� BP. CMck s.,; 5. ONa 5.15--t2 Stab i37'=t'�p' Job No OO�Ot-o9 5heet A CdYEM P/A3TSF �' lIM/SN LtlLOR - N � R/l8f0 RSGTANW4R G6udM PLIST[A 08TA11 - GtlLOp II j� I'LORIDA GOR/L SfONE..� [I.6YLN7 croun �s cauaivr vusrse -�� 1MISN COLOR - It S.S YL7AL ROOf COLOR - �� CO UR T YARD b 1��ARR 10 TT Y 443 EAST SHORE DR I�E CLEAR WA TER BEACH, FLORIDA 33767 SN rCLMSNf PGST6F �dY£NT P45T6R lLIXG - t flXISX ffNlSN - 11 � COLOR - IS CaIAN - N . � � .��' . ■' � ■ �-� � . _., ,III�'I"'I'II'�'� IIII"'��II"III '""I"I�'�I�I"' '/II"'Ifl'I�'I'II '"I'�III"IIII"� �II�I�'�II'II'�II� '"'�IIIII'IIII'II ''IIIIII"'If�'I�! ''�III"I""I'Ifl �II'�"'I"'I�III� I'�•'�"II"II' III'•'�""III '�"�"II'�I�III'i :'�"�II�"II'�'��1 '"I�I�"'I�II� {' I OPbM --1�,� � f OPCM -- _��_ '_ _ _ _� �.�'—_ ___'__'__�_ '___.— _ LOOVfR60 SUNSMID[S --' � ---"- OPPX OPLN - - — - '�� - -_- _-----_ � - -- � . . ! � .. _ . .. _ . . . . . I //J � j .3� � „m.-� i ' - — - � 6-� •�w �.,y.� _.��. _ I f��~� _. . . ... . . . �- . ,. �i `� , %' ��,, � ia ` � } . . . � , �.. ,. i� . .. PAINT & COLOR SCHh'DULE j r i �I OLYYPfC - PXS �MTf :, 2 �, OLriPlC - PY9 B7B 9 OLYYPIC - PXS 56B ^� �� OLYYPfC - PNS 67� i / T-oLYYPIC - PXS �Re ._.1_________._ __ __. COi7R'I'YARD r-.M,.�,,�� /�•""` Y!0 PO/M 6LCY 6NJlA. RY. J NOfd. ALL 8JCN5 n1PL --'_" -- - r[IY fL BI -6 �� Y10 PoINI' Ol' 3TI/F SNA�T !OR ILLV3TLTIIB PUAPoS(S ONtI' YLAN 6L. !f � � � '•'II'll'I'�'ll'•�I'1 • Y"�•"III"'� �� °.i • II'�•fl��'�II• '' � ,II1111111NIili6 �� D ��u �� F ` :Y � 6 2012 � PlAfVf�liNG 3� DEVELOPiU{ENT D�PT �� _:: ..._. ,-.:: � � � U �7Q� L �j C r �N � C m � cLj � �a ��g a ¢ o� � � �LL�� o�� m� � m o�v� � � ��QQQp� � �ap�� f�0 ^ Cy C Q � ^ wQ t.a P�AAP2T y � � " — - " r� -e T' I �i _ _ � r.u. rur Roor �, — YLN 6L. f8 -a �I y_ I (A'pT 1P 6FLd60 d0'-0') yiry� � I � �MOT6L /LVdl SfV6N y y � __ _ " _ - � M dL.dAN RE'-D" T � � N� � _� HOl6t L612'L S!X _.. y � a - _ � Y6AN CL SC =0 � T ��5�� NO1SL LSVBL fM L _...� ' . _ _ -" � � Y6/N fG �_! _p -T � i �,� NOf6G LSVdL fOUR ___ _ - � YS [L. Je -0 '� � OP[N - '� OPCN �i '�. � �� I ! _� ' __. _ .__ _ _ _ ' — ' — ' .._ ' ' ' _ ' _ ' _ _ _ ' I y,_ �GRAGd' �LM�'�L t�HF6�ly � 6L PYdAN 6'-0" T � OPLN oPLN + i � ------ -'—'—_---- ------- --4-,--cuucsaevacno 1 iYSIN 6L �8 -0 �-� T _ � _ ___ _ _ � H.l.C. __� ac. i =o . _ _ � cuues cevsc one i . d�. S —0 —._-T RA156D NSCTANCU4UC � ' CLYLN7 PfA378R 06CORATIV6 �WY. 4'sS' 1'AMSP.IRiM CR/0 CRfLG-T!'Y.-% osruc - coaox ;rs � FXTCR70R F/NlSX65 ANA OPFNlNCS PERC6NTAGdS STUDY ��. yyT ruvAna,v �, }�4Sr urvan P , 1fiBfX.-SJt �714N � �S4 � aama :�a �� cumc trx '; cwac.� M cwnc +n � •.amri .ex iuru�ce •ai j iunnra� . - R.rulw� ��s I nx i R , � . IaMIACS ONM.vGJ; � PMMMp OMNINfi� �61 �anv ur. __ rn uxe. nen �n uxe. wr. �n ; .wcre aar. •rs '�� rofv.. b* roru: �a � ror.a: uu j mru: en � EAST ELE VA TION CONCEPT -- ----�--�-�-- - �._.____ —. ______. ___.-_`___ ` SCALE - 3�32" - Y..O° � � � � � � � � � Q � 4 � A � �'' 4 � Q ` � �r � � Q �w3 O � � C.) <1" U � W °z W O � � � � � Q W Dnwn BP Cih9df $.r.$ Date n-t3+2 Swb 3�37'= ^.�-0" Jobao a,1��t-p3 Snast � Ca �TR TYARD b 1��ARR 10 TT Y 443 EAST SHORE DRIV-E CLEARWATER BEACH, FLORIDA 33767 ��,. CXTERlOH flNfSBCS AXD OP6HINCS PLRCCNTACLS SNOY '� I�LLLS��II4l! fSTj{�YdIYPK_ I .MR1N LLdY�fICN '� SN1TN ILfYIrIIN ��'. � � ... � ... i w.�,�. � �..,,� .� � �,�. ,� �. ,� � �a . w� ,� I OMNiNCS� i�A I OI6IMKa. ��i OMN/A� ifk oMN/Ma: �!1 �. � ua or �n ucx. ur �a � .xcx nr �n mn� � � 1ont m� w. a++� _ J NOR TH ELE VA TION CONCEPT —......._.__.._....."__"'"._.____'_—__ _ '__ __.__ SCRI.f� - 9i:32' � I � _�,. PAlNT d• COLOR SCHEOULE '� � ! OLYYPlt - PMS MN1TE ' '�.. 2 '� Of,YYPfC - PlIS 879 '' ��.. 8 ! Ot.7'NPIC - PYS S4B �—_—..i._.�_...—�--' � 1 ' OLYMPIC - P9I5 571 �" �� . �� e � OL}'MPlC - PYS 1PB �� QN M1SX LNCLOSUA6 SOUTH ELE VA TION C�NGEPT SCAGE - 9%32" = i--�0" Rwsaru Dm By � o U h � � �N� s �� N� F � s�a � � N � � O � � � � V v ( � a�4� i � �� V � n V �` C ^ �i 5 K K � � 3 ri es �a x n w .� � Q � �>� a �Qa .Q � � � q� 4 ¢�a E"" � ¢ �w Q O � � v�� z � 0 � 0 4 > � W � � O z Drewn B.P CMck S � S D�b 5��5-+7 Snk Ni2', 1�{p hbNo oC�01.�9 Snee!: C