The URL can be used to link to this page

FLD2012-05011 o Planning&Development Department � C earwater Flexible Development Application � Attached Dwellings, Mixed-Uses or Non-Residential Uses IT IS INCUMBENT UPON THE APPLICANT TO SUBMIT COMPLETE AND CORREC425 EAST SHORE DR INCOMPLETE OR INCORRECT INFORMATION MAY INVALIDATE YOUR APPLICA'FLD201 Z_p5011 1 O HEPPILANN NG&DE ELOPMENT D PARTMENT B NOON ON TH SCHEDI Frenchy's Saltwater Concept Zoning: Tourist Atlas#:267A A TOTAL OF 11 COMPLETE SETS OF PLAN$AND APPLICATION MATERIALS(1 ORIGINAL ANU 1u t,vr��.�... .._�_ ARE TO BE SUBMITTED FOR REVIEW BY THE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE. SUBSEQUENT SUBMITTAL FOR THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD WILL REQUIRE 15 COMPLETE SETS OF PLANS AND APPLICATION MATERIALS(1 ORIGINAL AND 14 COPIES). PLANS AND APPLICATIONS ARE REQUIRED TO BE COLLATED,STAPLED AND FOLDED INTO SETS. THE APPLICANT, BY FILING THIS APPLICATION, AGREES TO COMPLY WITH ALL APPLICABLE REQUIREMENTS OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE. FIRE DEPT PRELIMARY SITE PLAN REVIEW FEE: $200 APPLICATION FEE: $1,205 PROPERTY OWNER(PER DEED): Michael G Preston, Revocable Trust nnai�irv�a��RESS: 419 East Shore Dr. Clearwater Beach, FI. 33767 PHONE NUMBER: 727 44Q 2729 Ennai�: mpreston frenchysonline.com _ AGENT OR REPRESENTATIVE: Roberta Kiar MAILING ADDRESS: 28473 US 'I 9N Ste 6O2 Clearwater, FL. 33761 PHONE NUMBER: 727 799 542� Ennai�: Roberta@KlarKlar.com ADDRESS OF SUBJECT PROPERTY: 425 &44� EaSt SIlOt'@ DI'. Cl2aNV8t2t' B@8CI1, FL 33767 PARCELNUMBER(S): �829�5�25920�3�� LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOtS 'I alld Z, Block C, Barbour-Morrow Subdivision, According to the plat there of, as recorded in plat book 23, page 45, of the Public records of Pinellas county, FL. PROPOSE�usE(s): Restaurant �ESCRiPTioN oF REQUEST: We are requesting a reduction of the required number of off street Specifically identify rne request parking spaces to zero and to construct a 7,420 sq ft commerical dock as (include all requested code flexibility; amenity to new restaurant, construct new 3,290 sq ft public boardwalk for e.g., reduction in required number of porking spaces, height, setbocks, ior public use, a variance to increase width of dock from 75ft allowable to 79ft SrZe�orWrarn,specificuse,er�.�: proposed and a variance to increase length of dock from 225 ft allowed to 300 ft proposed. Planning&Development Department,100 S.Myrtle Avenue,Clearwater,FL 33756,Tel:727-562-4567;Fax:727-562-4865 Page 1 of 8 Revised 01/72 o _ Planning&Development Department � C ear�ate� Flexible Development Application � Data Sheet PLEASE ENSURE THAT THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION IS FILLED OUT, IN ITS ENTIRETY. FAILURE TO COMPLETE THIS FORM WILL RESULT IN YOUR APPLICATION BEING FOUND INCOMPLETE AND POSSIBLY DEFERRED UNTIL THE FOLLOWING APPLICATION CYCLE. ZONING DISTRICT: TOUfISt DIStCICt (RFH)R Resort Facilities High FUTURE LAND USE PLAN DESIGNATION: EXISTING USE(currently existing on site): Apal�mentS (R-2� PROPOSED USE(new use,if any;plus existing,ifto remain): R@StaUl'allt � �,b (,�,� � �y�A �p�L,S SITE AREA: 'I 3,557 sq.ft. .32 acres GROSS FLOOR AREA(total square footage of all buildings): Existing: �2,882 sq.ft. Proposed: ��749 sq.ft. Maximum Allowable: 13,557 sq.ft. GROSS FLOOR AREA(total square footage devoted to each use,if there will be multiple uses): First use: 10,749 sq.ft. Second use: sq.ft. Third use: sq.ft. FLOOR AREA RATIO(total square footage of all buildings divided by the total square footage of entire site): Existing: •95 Proposed: • Maximum Allowable: '� BUILDING COVERAGE/FOOTPRINT(1s`floor square footage of all buildings): � Existing: 5400 sq.ft. ( 40 %of site) Proposed: 85�7 sq.ft. ( 63 %of site) Maximum Permitted: 12879.15 sq.ft. ( 95 %of site) GREEN SPACE WITHIN VEHICULAR USE AREA(green space within the parking lot and interior of site;not perimeter buffer): Existing: � sq.ft. ( 0 %of site) Proposed: � sq.ft. ( � %of site) VEHICULAR USE AREA(parking spaces,drive aisles,loading area): Existing: +/- 2000 sq.ft. ( �5 %of site) Proposed: 0 sq.ft. ( � %of site) Planning&Development Department,100 S.Myrtle Avenue,Clearwater,FL 33756,Tel:727-562-4567;Fax:727-562-4865 Page 2 of 8 Revised 01/72 IMPERVIOUS SURFACE RATIO(total square footage of impervious areas divided by the total square footage of entire site): Existing: 12, 741 Proposed: 10,967 Maximum Permitted: 12,879.15 DENSITY(units,rooms or beds per acre): BUILDING HEIGHT: Existing: 17 Existing: +/- 22' from grade Proposed: 0 Proposed: +/- 33' from BFE Maximum Permitted: Il/a Maximum Permitted: 35' from BFE OFF-STREET PARKING: Existing: 14 Proposed: O, (2 H.C. Parallel parking spaces on Papaya St.) Minimum Required: 73 WHAT IS THE ESTIMATED TOTAL VALUE OF THE PROJECT UPON COMPLETION? S 2.5 million ZONING DISTRICTS FOR ALL ADJACENT PROPERTY: rvorth: Tourist (RFH) _ soutn: Tourist (RFH) _ East: OUC'IS _ west: Tourist (RFH) STATE OF FLORIDA,COUNTY OF PINELLAS S;�- I, the undersigned, acknowledge that all Sworn to and subscribed before me this day of representations made in this application are true and r�,-1�� (J- ,to me and/or by accurate to the best of my knowledge and authorize City representatives to visit and photograph the ��'�:��!f� �-��'� J who is personally known has property described in this application. � produced f'l-� l��—� � �� 3�--1�'1°�j(3 G as identification. t _ � � � � l �// ��5� ' ! �< ,�- -- -t SC ' �� il( ��__ Signature of property owner or representative Notary public, ��ryPUbNc,steteofF�da �Ay Camm.Expkes Ju�e 11,2013 My commission expires: No.DDB98059 Planning&Development Department,100 S.Myrtle Avenue,Clearwater,FL 33756,Tel:727-562-4567;Fax:727-562-4865 Page 3 of 8 Revised 01/72 o (` Planning&Development Department } learwater Flexible Develo ment Application � l� p � Site Plan Submittal Package Check list IN ADDITION TO THE COMPLETED FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT(FLD)APPLICATION,ALL FLD APPLICATIONS SHALL INCLUDE A SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL PACKAGE THAT INCLUDES THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION AND/OR PLANS: ❑ Responses to the flexibility criteria for the specific use(s) being requested as set forth in the Zoning District(s) in which the subject property is located. The attached Flexible Development Application Flexibility Criteria sheet shall be used to provide these responses. ❑ Responses to the General Applicability criteria set forth in Section 3-914.A. The attached Flexible Development Application General Applicability Criteria sheet shall be used to provide these responses. ❑ A signed and sealed survey of the property prepared by a registered land surveyor including the location of the property, dimensions, acreage, location of all current structures/improvements, location of all public and private easements including official records book and page numbers and street right(s)-of-way within and adjacent to the site. ❑ If the application would result in the removal or relocation of mobile home owners residing in a mobile home park as provided in F.S.§723.083,the application must provide that information required by Section 4-202.A.5. ❑ If this application is being submitted for the purpose of a boatlift, catwalk, davit, dock, marina, pier, seawall or other similar marine structure, then the application must provide detailed plans and specifications prepared by a Florida professional engineer, bearing the seal and signature of the engineer,except signed and sealed plans shall not be required for the repair or replacement of decking, stringers, railing, lower landings, tie piles, or the patching or reinforcing of existing piling on private and commercial docks. ❑ A site plan prepared by a professional architect,engineer or landscape architect drawn to a minimum scale of one inch equals 50 feet on a sheet size not to exceed 24 inches by 36 inches that includes the following information: ❑ Index sheet of the same size shall be included with individual sheet numbers referenced thereon. ❑ North arrow,scale,location map and date prepared. ❑ Identification of the boundaries of phases,if development is proposed to be constructed in phases. ❑ Location of the Coastal Construction Control Line (CCCL), whether the property is located within a Special Flood Hazard Area,and the Base Flood Elevation(BFE)of the property,as applicable. ❑ Location,footprint and size of all existing and proposed buildings and structures on the site. ❑ Location and dimensions of vehicular and pedestrian circulation systems, both on-site and off-site,with proposed points of access. ❑ Location of all existing and proposed sidewalks, curbs,water lines, sanitary sewer lines, storm drains,fire hydrants and seawalls and any proposed utility easements. ❑ Location of onsite and offsite stormwater management facilities as well as a narrative describing the proposed stormwater control plan including calculations. Additional data necessary to demonstrate compliance with the City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteria manual may be required at time of building construction permit. ❑ Location of solid waste collection facilities, required screening and provisions for accessibility for collection. ❑ Location of off-street loading area,if required by Section 3-1406. ❑ All adjacent right(s)-of-way,with indication of centerline and width, paved width, existing median cuts and intersections and bus shelters. ❑ Dimensions of existing and proposed lot lines, streets, drives, building lines, setbacks, structural overhangs and building separations. ❑ Building or structure elevation drawings that depict the proposed building height and building materials. Planning&Development Department,100 S.Myrtle Avenue,Clearwater,FL 33756,Tel:727-562-4567;Fax:727-562-4865 Page 4 of 8 Revised 01112 ❑ Typical floor p�ans,including floor plans for each floor of any parking garage. ❑ Demolition plan. ❑ Identification and description of watercourses, wetlands, tree masses, specimen trees, and other environmentally sensitive areas. ❑ If a deviation from the parking standards is requested that is greater than 50% (excluding those standards where the difference between the top and bottom of the range is one parking space), then a parking demand study will need to be provided. The findings of the study will be used in determining whether or not deviations to the parking standards are approved. Please see the adopted Parking Demand Study Guidelines for further information. ❑ A tree survey showing the location, DBH and species of all existing trees with a DBH of four inches or more, and identifying those trees proposed to be removed,if any. ❑ A tree inventory, prepared by a certified arborist, of all trees four inches DBH or more that reflects the size, canopy, and condition of such trees may be required if deemed applicable by staff.Check with staff. ❑ ATraffic Impact Study shall be required for all proposed developments if the total generated net new trips meet one or more of the following conditions: ■ Proposal is expected to generate 100 or more new trips in any given hour(directional trips,inbound or outbound on the abutting streets)and/or 1,000 or more new trips per day;or ■ Anticipated new trip generation degrades the level of service as adopted in the City's Comprehensive Plan to unacceptable levels;or ■ The study area contains a segment of roadway and/or intersection with five reportable accidents within a prior twelve month period, or the segment and/or intersection exists on the City's annual list of most hazardous locations, provided by the City of Clearwater Police Department;or ■ The Traffic Operations Manager or their designee deems it necessary to require such assessment in the plan review process. Examples include developments that are expected to negatively impact a constrained roadway or developments with unknown trip generation and/or other unknown factors. ❑ A landscape plan shall be provided for any project where there is a new use or a change of use;or an existing use is improved or remodeled in a value of 25% or more of the valuation of the principal structure as reflected on the property appraiser's current records, or if an amendment is required to an existing approved site plan; or a parking lot requires additional landscaping pursuant to the provisions of Article 3, Division 14. The landscape plan shall include the following information,if not otherwise required in conjunction with the application for development approval: ❑ Location, size, description, specifications and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, including botanical and common names. ❑ Existing trees on-site and immediately adjacent to the site,by species,size and location,including drip line. ❑ Interior landscape areas hatched and/or shaded and labeled and interior landscape coverage, expressed both in square feet, exclusive of perimeter landscaped strips, and as a percentage of the paved area coverage of the parking lot and vehicular use areas. ❑ Location of existing and proposed structures and improvements, including but not limited to sidewalks, walls, fences, pools, patios, dumpster pads, pad mounted transformers, fire hydrants, overhead obstructions, curbs, water lines, sanitary sewer lines, storm drains, seawalls, utility easements, treatment of all ground surfaces, and any other features that may influence the proposed landscape. ❑ Location of parking areas and other vehicular use areas, including parking spaces, circulation aisles, interior landscape islands and curbing. ❑ Drainage and retention areas,including swales,side slopes and bottom elevations. ❑ Delineation and dimensions of all required perimeter landscaped buffers including sight triangles,if any. Planning&Development Department,100 S.Myrtle Avenue,Clearwater,FL 33756,Tei:727-562-4567;Fax:727-562-4865 Page 5 of 8 Revised 07/12 o (` Planning&Development Department � 1 arwater Flexible Develo ment A lication � la � p pp � General Applicability Criteria PROVIDE COMPLETE RESPONSES TO EACH OF THE SIX(6)GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA EXPLAINING HOW,IN DETAIL,THE CRITERION IS BEING COMPLIED WITH PER THIS DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL. 1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. ` '��f� �'Cfi,a[�l1'�_1r��1�.� �UC31Jll�_�"'GQUIIP��Jl�r� '_fiO�.. �ES'��eA.k�` A�'D S��PC-L4TF� ��D�i ��ta�tl�l, Svi3►r►ttt1!!rt��ul�JlfiwlTS Y'a2. 'ba�Y.S A..•� '� ' � '�4.1D4.IC_ 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. �E,�.a$"� iD '�`� .�i�W 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety or persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use. S!�i[�i 1��'�F"��' 1�VF`i 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. � {�.�5�.tsG -�v �"-I At�a�r 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. ��.=-=��°s�t�� ` l A�v� 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts,on adjacent properties. S� S� tb� � �� Planning&Development Department,100 S.Myrtle Avenue,Clearwater,FL 33756,Tel:727-562-4567;Fax:727-562-4865 Page 6 of 8 Revised 01/12 o Planning&Development Department > � a,�a,�er Flexible Development Application � � e � � Flexibility Criteria PROVIDE COMPLETE RESPONSES TO THE APPLICABLE FLEXIBILITY CRITERIA FOR THE SPECIFIC USE(5)BEING REQUESTED AS SET FORTH IN THE ZONING DISTRICT(S)IN WHICH THE SUBJECT PROPERTY iS LOCATED. EXPLAIN HOW,IN DETAIL,EACH CRITERION IS BEING COMPLIED WITH PER THIS DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL(USE SEPARATE SHEETS AS NECESSARY). 1. �`� 1�rTT�+d�iA �Jt21TC�.� ��,1�Iji�, �v11Z1�►a�YtS ��Q.. k-� ��iTA�nJ�PJ.��_ s.�taS'�a.,—��1t3��1-rr rei-r�t.ti� �'MP►�Art, �'aR. ,�a.l, �'�E�1sFS J. z. � �i4� 3. � E. �` l - 4. s�E �,� #� I 5. 5� x��_, '�"' � 5. ��c.E�J�. �"� 7. 8. Planning&Development Department,100 S.Myrtle Avenue,Clearwater,FL 33756,Tel:727-562-4567;Fax:727-562-4865 Page 7 of 8 Revised 01/12 • � }r-�' . ' , - i-- �%(��l.-�'��'' �� , �. LL .> "" '�� Planning&Development Department Q,,:` _;:�,,: _'..,-'. r � ;� �a,��,t�r Flexible Development Appl�cation � � Affidavit to Authorize Agent/Representative 1. Provide names of all property owners on deed–PRINT full names: �S�kO�1V��L �l. �-�_�-�vbL�►�'11tl�T' ��,oc�r,�;, ".",.c.1.1r��,�. ta TR.� 2. That(I am/we are}the owner(s}and record title holder(s)of the following described property: �=;; � �t2� �sr s� �. 3, That this property constitutes the property for which a request for(describe request): �bUL11o►.�► F� b� st�'.,�t �'D�-�L�la ; (�i.�-�'l�C-L"� ��°-�-�ON�+�1'�'ZIcaC. 1�?c.t--� �?�t o 5�� u�u� ��u+��, A�1b v�1�1�s;"�r�. 3a��'r t�x1c. �1c,�A�1 b ointed and does/do)appoint: �� G� �� 4, 7hat the undersigned{has/have)app ( ��.2.T�e �- � �Gl.1l�L- A.�D �E.l _ t Ivr��rL , / �I(� ~as(his/their}agent(sj to execute any petitions or other documents necessary to affect such petitlon, 5. That this affidavit has been executed to induce the City of Clearwater, Florida to consider and act on the above described property; 6. ThaC site visits to the property are necessary by City representatives in order to process this application and the owner authorizes City representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application; 7. That I/we},the der ned authority,hereby certi#y that the foregoing is true and correct. �Property Owner Property Owner Property Owner Property Owner STATB OF FLORIDA�COUNTY OF PMNELLAS BEFORE ME THE UNDER5IGNED,AN OFFICEft DULY COMMISSI(�NED BY THE LAWS OF THE SYATE OF FLORIDA,ON THlS DAY OF �� A s��` , �(�� , PERSONALLY APPEARED �i�� .-�S�__ WHO HAVWG BEEN F1RST DULY SWORN —�— DEPOSED AND SAYS THAT HE/SHE FULLY UNDERSTANDS 7HE CONTENTS OF TNE AFFIQAVI7 THAT HE/SHE SIGNED. ABB�R:tUKACS �`'''�� MY COMMISS�ON#ff10689't - �� EXPIRES:JUL 05,2015 Bonded through tst Stffie�naorance Notary Publ ic Signature Notary Seal/Stamp My Commission Expires: 0'� � Pianning&Development Department,100 S.Myrtle Avenue,Clearwater,FL 33T58,Tel:727-582-4587;FaxRev sed 0112 Page 8 of 8 May 11, 2012 klar and klar Project: Frenchy's Saltwater Concept, Board walk, and Docks • architects inc. Architect's Project Number: 98K20-07. RE: DRC Application Supplemental Data. Flexible Development Application General Applicability Criteria 1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. 28473 u.s. 19 n. The proposed development will be in harmony with the adjacent c I e a r w a t e r properties along East Shore and Papaya streets as well as flarida 33Z61 Clearwater beaches as a whole, and will heighten and improve the community character. The proposed restaurant will provide a node for pedestrian traffic and attract the public to the new 15' wide boardwalk and docks along the eastern edge of the property down to Frenchy's Seafood Company. The proposed restaurant, docks, and boardwalk will attract boaters, tourists, and locals to Clearwater Beach. 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the ' appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. ph. 727.799.5420 The proposed development fits in line with the tourist district and fax 727.799.9625 marina district and will only enhance the value and character of the www.klarklar.com neighborhood. 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health and safety or persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use. This proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety or persons residing or working in the neighborhood. By providing pedestrian friendly sidewalks, a public board walk, and appropriate night lighting it can only increase the safety and health or persons in the neighborhood. roberta s. klar aia steven I. klar aia ��x: 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. The proposed development minimizes traffic congestion by creating a more pedestrian walkway into the site, along with providing a waterfront public boardwalk from subject property down south to . Frenchy's Seafood Company. We are also providing new dock space for boating access to the subject property. 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. The proposed development is consistent with community character by creating a "fishing village" theme located along the shore that compliments Frenchy's Seafood Company located along the boardwalk. 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation � impacts, on adjacent properties. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects � by abiding with local sound ordinances, shielding.the location of the outdoor bar away from the Oasis Motel, and shifting the building to focus more on the water views and Papaya St. (Palm St.) Flexible Development Application Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project Criteria 1. The redevelopment of this property is impractical without deviations from the parking requirements for the following reason. a. The lot is small and if we were to provide off-street parking there would be an impractical building foot print available for , a restaurant. 2. The redevelopment meets several major goals of the Comprehensive Plan and "Tourist" Zoning District as well as Beach by Design's "Marina District". They are: � a. Provide a much improved pedestrian-friendly street presence along East Shore Drive and Papaya. We see the property as a major node and point of destination for Clearwater Beach especially for pedestrian traffic from the hotels and condominiums on Mandalay, as well as, vehicular and pedestrian traffic from the "round about". b. Papaya is a major axis between the Gulf of Mexico and the intracoastal waterway. We are providing a public boardwalk along the intracoastal that extends from the end of Papaya to the south end of Frenchy's Seafood Company. The redevelopment opens up the intracoastal to 301 L.F. for public use by providing the boardwalk which has been a goal of Beach by Design. It will allow tourists to finally have access to the intracoastal/ Clearwater Harbor and provide a wonderful glimpse of a working fishing marina as the boardwalk travels past Frenchy's Seafood Company. The proposed development is extremely compatible with the goals of Beach by Design. "Beach by Design supports the redevelopment of the � Marina District into a pedestrian and boater-friendly destination that includes a mix of hotels, commercial, restaurant, residential and mixed-use development, as well as a variety of dock facilities and water related uses. " c. The restaurant and docks will now provide a boating destination for tourists and locals. There is no casual restaurant in north Pinellas County that can be accessed by boats, the proposed development will fill that need and attract more people. 3. This development will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of surrounding properties. In fact we feel this redevelopment will set a precedence of continuing the boardwalk as a public amenity. It will cleanup a major Clearwater Beach pedestrian node, encourage new development, and supplement existing planned development. 4. Adjoining properties will not suffer substantial detriment as a result of the proposed development; we abide with local sound ordinances by shielding the location of the outdoor bar away from the Oasis Motel, and shifting the building to focus more on the water views and Papaya St. (Palm St.) 5. The redeve�opment of this property, docks, public boardwalk, and restaurant are compatible with the future use of the Tourist District and also with Beach by Design. We comply with 5 out of 6 of the following objectives: a. The proposed use is permitted in this zoning district as a minimum standard, flexible standard or flexible development use. b. The proposed use wouid be a significant economic contributor to the city's economic base by diversifying the local economy or by creating jobs. The restaurant will be larger than the current Frenchy's Saltwater and will employ more people. Note: The proposed restaurant is a relocation of the existing Frenchy's Saltwater. In addition the proposed development will attract more people to the beach because of the docks, restaurant and public boardwalk that passes a working fishing marina. The more people the more economic gain for Clearwater Beach. c. The development proposal accommodates the expansion or redevelopment of an existing economic contributor by providing a public boardwalk which attracts more tourists and locals in addition to providing more jobs. - d. The proposed development does not address affordable housing. e. The proposed use provides for the development of a new working waterfront use by providing a public boardwalk that passes a working fishing dock/marina. 6. Flexibility with regard to use, lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street parking are justifi�d based on demonstrated compliance. Our proposed development meets and exceeds the following in objectives. a. The proposed development will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of the surrounding properties for uses permitted in this zoning district. Our development will encourage new development and will supplement any new development. � b. The proposed development complies with applicable Beach by Design guidelines adopted by the city "Beach by Design" concept. (see quote 2b.) c. The design, scale and intensity of the proposed development supports the established or emerging character of the area by creating a "fishing village" theme located along the shore that compliments Frenchy's Seafood Company located along the boardwalk. d. In order to form a cohesive, visually interesting and attractive appearance, the proposed development incorporates a substantial number of the following design elements. We achieve a "fishing village concept" through architectural elements such as: colorful fish motifs found in columns, railings and hanging fish art facing East Shore Drive. The design incorporates a variety of heights, a welcoming, friendly front, side and rear porch. In addition, the dumpster area is set back from the pedestrian way. � e. The proposed development provides for appropriate buffers, enhanced landscape design and appropriate distances between buildings. See landscape design. PARKING ANALYSIS FOR 425 AND 441 EAST SHORE DRIVE CLEARWATER BEACH, FLORIDA � PREPARED FOR: CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA PREPARED BY: KLAR AND KLAR ARCHITECTS INC. I. INTRODUCTION/ ANALYSIS The project site is located on the corner of East Shore Drive and Papaya Street and currently contains two apartment buildings that were originally two motels. The site is proposed to be redeveloped as a restaurant, dock, and public boardwalk. The site is located in the Tourist (T) zoning district, and per Section 2-803 of the Community Development Code has a minimum parking requirement of 7-15 spaces per 1,000 square feet "GFA". According to the code the proposed development would be required 74 parking spaces. We are proposing "0" on-site spaces. The proposed site plan shows 2 on-street handicap spaces. In addition there will be 14 spaces available solely for the proposed restaurant in a lot owned by Michael "Frenchy" Preston next to the current Frenchy's Saltwater. This lot is +/- 350' away from the proposed development. The proposed restaurant is a relocation of Frenchy's Saltwater. The current Frenchy's Saltwater will close once the new restaurant is opened. In addition there are 122 public parking spaces available on public lots 35, 34, 63, and 43- see attached Beach Parking map. These lots are within 1000 ft. of the proposed.development, 1000 feet is a reasonable distance for pedestrian travel. For instance, a one way trip between JCPenny and Sears at the Countryside Mall is around 1,050 feet. In addition there is on-street parking available, mostly on side (east/west) streets, especially along Papaya. However an exact count and availability have not been observed. City of Clearwater staff supports "0" on-site parking allowing the restaurant fa�ade and a new sidewalk to be the border of East Shore Drive. This would provide a more desirable streetscape and walking experience, as opposed to a parking lot fronting East Shore Drive. We along with City of Clearwater staff has recognized the proposed development on Clearwater Beach is in close proximity to municipal parking lots, on-street parking spaces, nearby hotels/motels and residential condominiums within walking distance, have a great potential for "walk-up" costumers. Staff also recognizes the available parking in nearby lots serves two functions, one to serve beachgoers, and two to provide parking for beach related business. In addition, the proposed development will attract customers traveling by boat. This is currently the situation with the docks at Frenchy's Seafood Company serving customers at Frenchy's Saltwater. The development goal is to be a premier boater's destination on Clearwater Beach. II. Need The request for zero on-site parking is because the lot is so small that if we were to provide on-site parking there would be an impractical building footprint available for a restaurant. To make the project a viable business venture a minimum number of seats needed to be designed, this would force the kitchen to be on a second level. This becomes difficult for deliveries, seating, and food preparation. Furthermore, if parking were to occur on-site the only available street frontage is East Shore Drive. In order to cohesively work with the ideals of Beach by Design, to improve pedestrian friendly streets and create a lively street life atmosphere, parking onsite cannot exist. Furthermore if onsite parking_is placed on the proposed site the location will directly affect the pedestrian nature and feel of the sidewalk, a connection that Beach by Design is trying to improve for Clearwater Beach. III. Conclusion It is estimated that most of the customers to the proposed development will be walk-up traffic and boaters. There are 122 spaces available within a reasonable walking distance in public lots. 14 provided by the owner's own parking lots and 2 on-street spaces as part of the proposed site plane. There are a total of 138 spaces available. Therefore adequate parking is available for the development. ' ....� � � -� , ... ,.. ��_'�� .,.,.� r #'.a � 'I' � � �ff�i: .r d� 'I � � « � �ka I ".£::k . � ; � .. �� . 1 �, f-� �r� +,�•y„ , ar � ,�� . t , , ,- .. � � r!' ,. "��° ��t j ��`{'�+� '�`� ' � "�� '�.�,�- � � � �. . .. , ..,� � �!'F 1 . � :�!k� •�'�'`q+.i ! � � . .. K ' . � p ` �' .,t' ��. r..^ �, �n � � � r,�, �� '� ti� �a�� xap r H,�'�� '`�. r � ,� � t `.'+'� � ��{� �,� �� 1��. _'�"��.��; +� �s � c�. � 4 �'5p} �� . � a�'s'.�-�,��-k�:�' '�`~�� " _�i " 4re d "4`""a" �. .. j � . yx!_��.� . v� �w. # ��. �` �.��` " • �,�� . .,� � 3�y ��t `� !�F�..�. . � , , � � , �x � � �� ,:�k�+�E>�� ' ` °� ,� � , � �- �� r � ----__ I� ��a„ �� #� �� -` �. �'�� ' � <�t_.. ,��,�'��f�� I; �~: ,;� w�'�":�� . �`, . , � � ' r . l"+ � ! " � ��wf � �..y M 7`f` i ��_�� 4_�}q �i !'� li v M�nr yc±u� ,s ��*'� �Af�W7 U� # ..1•,-. .r� .� q. a. � Y�..- •� ?T'W� .�•� ■ '� � y$ � �, �f.! �� XTV. W/... r!T� �y1F�iY � M1 ..�• � T�. ! !P" b} �� - a rk� �f��`p��z��.. �s�w��`�'� ,� r # � .� _} ` � »� g !� { "� � ,,M ��-°!'s �' �r., �, ` ��SS� � �� '� "` �* � fi,�r •,t'4y: _ . .. � , w�... � ^ 1 .,w.,,1 �. t. . '� ��. �� .�E�,. ,.*� q "- T a �•� � �_ �' -,.�', ,� • , ,� � , —.�• �„ "�, — � ��w � � � , ,,�,, ` ,.�- . . ' °�`:: '�' ° ,� � .. ,� _ ��,,.,. ��; � �"�`�' o � � � � � �� yt. 'e,.� �' . i.. ro �� '�._' �:%w�� 'ri• « �� + r tl J. � i��, � -� ��`` �'_ � ' � .,�� ,,� � a . : , � _ �r,� � i �_ '��' '� R: � � � � �'"" � . ��+� k ��1 �� #,�.�,_. . � _�� ,� , � �� ... � �� ' � � ,�,�' `� A�� . ,-4 � �, , 1F'"� ��:�. ~ ',:{��: � �--�� .. . '�.� �.::� . ,�`t.�*4. t•��,. - 7R � Tf� iii, :�'��. �4 +� � �'` �.. �a �li PY f ',,� w " , � .'� .'N �. • .« w� . + "� ,�.�.�.�_>- g� � ��' "^�^�r + ¢ �•� �� e � ��=�, � � ,s�#a��, 4"�� t�-„°�1 � i {' �" I t �;' � �� '7' _ � � �;� . . A- �.�� ; ; . � � .;� �, .r �'"� � �,c ,� �'�� " � r�'� r z �' �� " . r -�e, ��s.�. �.>'— � . q � I d { '�!�f� r F � � � is�-�,Jl..r � '@�`*,e �p J�,I� II ,..�s,'�* � ,�' �, � +" l � V�� r �'�j '6 � � �.. xw � li�� ^� �� . '" �w :�� .,�i,, r. ,+, _ , ` .. � i . � g �� '� ''� � � '�. r , i > , � � , �� ,; ,-:+ �I � i�r i n '-... .� • � - � ,,,�„�e� u,�, � �'- � •- � v �y � y" ,"s�� +,`. .�� ...* t . � i .w�� ,.;J��'1 y AY. � � 1 _..�s. 14 -,..' , �� M! .,,,,a�wr` ` ' - _ � � Ik� " � '4 ^�1" rltl � � �ys . u q qa -}a � . y y} � q-p�."� k;,t��`�� 7'��_ �P '��i - ,'..�'�S . � y y,� �. � • G/� �� , �� _�. - �� f��aY �.. d.�.+. � f ��=f � �#t, -w � {ta� * �� . . � . � � � f " � ., j � , � ; +r ' ' ♦ v • ^ � , .^ ' �.. �t , �� a F� . � � " ., � � ��'� . � «,,,� � �� ,,�, � � y*.a'-E4AE'�"�4 r .,'�' ��: ,� �� f'"� � , � �� $ _ �� . � � ,��'!' ��,, � � " —— �, , s , � ¢i � . .:: . Y �� d ' � ��-' „� t f� ,�.,75 �"4.:,. .+. '�"'�' � .,TM, ..r.,� n�...+ra.� � ��. -� � .. . ,�-,,, �� +�r_' � � �! '#_ �'+�,...�: �s ,.ir..,.. .0 ,we t�,fJ� �- r,� '+�' �. � F. . ,> � n �w. —. �...—� r +r.-� �.3:E..�� ° � � > x..�_�3:"7'�' '�� . S.� .... �t �.. .. �L._,,,.,..,.� - .�:—m* i � !� , � �-` ..� ,1i 4- ,�•' -� 'v,.7`P . ,,._ ' �� *, $�' . � � . +� � i. h :� "u�- $ . _. , �: .' � �� z -" '�`"' �'- � �: ��+� .��` � . r " �,. - '�i� r 1��.. '� F ��_ �`"�,,�.� ` � , . �u 1F ��,4 f � a * ,�_.r� �-r�� ,; . �.r i ,,� �,. ,��,�' �►' .��'``" � �' ' L� °',�, � * ��,. `N`° 'y�� "f�lt� , . �_� �� _ ',C p ] � . '� . �T"� ¢'A'{ , ��.a Y 4 ..,f" . � - . 'N�.. • ` T l� . �e . � �. ID �� .�� t ry . h': �� ' # � 'fl4` ` ' ♦ * r L � i"e #�;1�...tp 'F � '� #� �' 6,�.�'�� K � N .� ��if".' �i�� 'F�R"R Tt#4�Cf ` .� ��,�� . � , .�"�� ;� �� ,�,.; ``° �'* r..��z. � �.,.�C�� .� � �'� �i �.4xr�-E°�� ,�«`�T, � � � ,- ,� � �� = � ..� � ��-�ll� ��'�'�"� r�`�',"�� 'P :� � • , :�.•,j��-��.�s. _� __. �, _,. �. _. . 1'�.r.r.�.s. , m .. .. I� ' � �� . 1!�A!!!1�� l � ��:� ��' �I��C �f�'�� _J CITY PARKING LOTS 39 sT �/ Hourly Rates 17 Spaces * �N�� (Daily Rates) Hours of After ST RWA� O Lot Location **Sat-Sun t�o Enforcement Hours Ho�� Mon-Fri & NORTH � seasona� Not to Scale 37 Q A � � MARINA No , �� Marina #0.75 $1.00 ACTIVITIES Charge AVAL � � �`TA 25 Causeway Blvd. ONLY 8am-6pm 53 Spaces * ST a � � WpY sT � �+ �1* Pier 60 �1.50 �Z•� 7am-lam Closed BAY E 160 S.Gulfview Blvd. (�10•�) (#12.50) 36 - �2.75 �2.75 145 Spaces * 32* 332 S.Gulfview Blvd. �$16.�� ,16,pp� 7am-lam Closed O 38 33 212 Hamden Dr. �1.00 �1.25 6am-lipm CINo d V RocrcAw�r 79 Spaces * 34 423 Mandalay Ave. �1.00 �1.25 Sam-6pm Charge No � sr � 3S 457 Mandalay Ave. �1.00 �1.25 Sam-6pm Charge �'i W 36* 4 Rockaway St. �1.00 #1.25 6am-iam Closed � � Avalon-Kendall NO 37* $i,p0 $1.25 8am-lOpm Charge BAYMONT � 6 Avalon St. ilam-6pm � (Mon-Fri) Z �; Family Aquatic Center 8am-6pm No 35 M�RCO a � 38* &Recreation Center ;1.00 #1•25 ��t&Holidays) Charge 25 Spaces ° � 51 Bay Esplanade 12:30pm-6pm � (Sun) V McKay Field No 34 pAPAYA sr 39� �1.00 #1.Z5 8am-lOpm Charge � 63 605 Mandalay Ave. 23 Spaces Gateway #i.pp �1.25 8am-6pm Charge 33 Spaces " 43 390/i East Shore Dr. } �1.00 �1.25 No � �I ^ 63* 400 E.Shore Dr. ��10.00) (�12.50) �m-6pm Charge F � � s 43 �n�Z�S spaces)ng $1'� �1.25 Varies 41 Spaces * p�p�-�sa/Master Card/American Express � Yl Plj'R 6O — / .vaa �, � Ocswr **Seasonal Rabe-Mlarch through April everyday �_ 31 Notes: -Does not include Handiwp or � 939 Spaces " ,� Reserved Spaces � M�1RIN �� Tosfo�`�i�� -Information Subject to Change r ' ,� r/�I u ��io°oycql, �Y � �� a spJSFK,41- � � ___ p�N 33 348 Spaces LEGEND: oR 24 Spaces MARINA ACTIVITIES � City Park � � -___� ONLY (8am-6pm) �—� public Beach � �' D � City Parking Lot ■� r� oF� �� Private Parking Lot-Open to Public V .•� � ;o.�.�� Private Parking Garage-Open to Pubiic L +�:'i � � �� On Street Parking � m .at�• Sr � Oversize Vehicle Parking � 3 •o� (24'-40'only) � ''.;. o � Private Parking � g o Open to Public General Parking Information V y � (727) 562-4704 � BRIGHTWA7ER DRIVE Parking System Hotline � (727) 562-4892 L sr CL E,Q.R Nr�TE 2 C L E A P W A T E fl � F L O A � D A � 2° ��ACH WAL.K � = BAYSIDE �R/� , v � 32 H��B°� ° Clearwater � � �, 2aa sPa�Q� t S�� _ _ PK.e e� U ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT �`� � www.myClearwater.com Frenchy's Restaurant Docks & Public Boardwalk Request.� 1. Construct a 7,420 sq ft commercial dock as amenity to new upland restaurant; 2. Construct a 3,604 sq ft public boardwalk over water for public use; 3. Variance to increase the width of the dock from 75 ft allowed to 79 ft proposed; and 4. Variance to increase the length of the dock from 225 ft allowed to 300 ft proposed. Written Submittal Requirements Responses to the Flexibility Criteria for the specific use being requested as set forth in the Zoning Districts in which the subject property is proposed Dock Criteria Section 3-601C.3 (a) through (h) a._ Use and compatibilitv The proposed 7,420 sq ft commercial floating dock is for use by the new restaurant patrons. The applicant has demonstrated insurmountable success in the restaurant business on Clearwater Beach. The floating docks just to the south are already extremely busy with boaters who travel by boat to a restaurant destination and the new docks are expected to have the same level of use. Boaters traveling by boat to their restaurant destinations often remain on the Beach to shop and visit other places. Increasing boating access to the Beaches is exactly what the City of Clearwater envisioned in Beach by Design for the developments along East Shore Dr. Therefore, the proposed commercial dock is consistent with the vision of increasing waterfront and boating access to Clearwater Beach. The applicant is also proposing to construct a public boardwalk as part of the project. A public boardwalk is an amenity the City has placed great value in along the properties on East Shore Dr. , The public boardwalk and will increase pedestrian traffic that will draw and unite visitors to existing and future East Shore Dr. developments. The public boardwalk will begin at the parcel just south of Papaya St. It will continue along the seawall for approximately 100 linear feet where it will extend out over water continuing south to connect and cross through the existing dock at the newly updated Oasis Motel and then connect to Frenchy's seafood docks. Future developmen#s on East Shore Dr. will be able to connect to this boardwalk and continue south. The applicant owns all of the combined properties allowing him to build the boardwalk as part of his new restaurant and dock project. The applicant acknowledges and agrees to grant a public easement to the City of Clearwater along the entire length of the boardwalk. The applicant intends to build � the new commercial dock and boardwalk at the same time and the timing will be dependent on obtaining all of the required government permits. The new commercial restaurant dock and the � boardwalk will require permits from Pinellas County Water& Navigation, the Florida Department of Environmental Protection and the U.S Army Corps of Engineers before construction can begin. As regards the use and compatibility of the dock project, the use of docks in the immediate area are tied to their respective upland uses such that hotel docks are only used by hotel guests and residential docks are only used by unit owners. Likewise the proposed restaurant docks will only be used by restaurant patrons. 1 As regards the existing docks in the immediate area, please see the attached Woods Consultinp Exhibit 1. This exhibit was created to show the length of the proposed docks in relation to the existing docks in the immediate area. The exhibit also shows docks that have been approved by the City of Clearwater but are not yet constructed. • Immediately to the north of the project site is Papaya St., a right of way (R.O.W.). There currently are no docks on this R.O.W. • The property immediately to the north of Papaya St. is 443 East Shore Dr. This property combined with 463 East Shore Dr. was approved by the City for a commercial dock that is 275 ft in length. The docks have not yet been constructed. • The property to the north of 463 East Shore Dr. is the East Shore Resort. The East Shore Resort recently built their docks that are approximately 250 ft in length. • At the north end of the exhibit are the Belle Harbour Condominiums that currently have docks that are approximately 332 ft in length as measured from the seawall. • The property to the south of the project site is the Oasis Motel. This dock is used as fishing pier and will remain for the hotel guests. The proposed public boardwalk will actually connect and pass through this dock. • To the south of the Oasis Motel is the seafood dock located at 419 East Shore Dr. that extends into Clearwater Harbor approximately 273 ft. The seafood dock provides transient mooring for restaurant patrons and permanent mooring for commercial fishing vessels. • The upland property to the south of the seafood docks is 411 East Shore Dr. The property is vacant but has an existing dock that is approximately 60 ft in length. The city approved a new commercial docking facility for docks that are 318 ft in length. The docks have not yet been constructed. • Other docks built within Clearwater Harbor include the Barefoot Bay commercial docks that extend 250 ft in length and the Island Way Yacht Club's commercial docks that extend 400 ft in length into the waterway. b. Impacts on existing water recreation activities. The proposed dock will not adversely impact the health, safety or well being of persons currently using the adjacent waterways for recreational and/or commercial uses. The dock will not preclude the existing uses of the adjacent waterway. The proposed dock does not impede navigation or use of existing recreational areas. Although a length variance is being requested, the width of the waterway at this location is approximately 1,385 ft. The dock will extend only 22% of the width of the waterway which is less than 25% the width of the waterway—a criterion generally accepted for how far docks can extend into a waterway. The proposed docks are also 255 ft away from the 2 west boundary of the nearest channel. See the attached Exhibit 1 that shows the project in relation to the width of waterway and Mandalay Channel. c. Impacts on naviqation. The dock as proposed will not have a detrimental impact on the use of adjacent waters for navigation, transportation, recreational or other public conveniences. As noted above, please see the attached Exhibit 1 that shows the proposed dock in relation to Mandalay Channel. The proposed dock is approximately 255 ft from the edge of Mandalay Channel and the proposed dock only extends out into the waterway 22%the width of the waterway. This allows for more than 50% of the waterway to remain open for safe navigation. d. Impacts on marine environment. The site was surveyed for the presence of protected resources such as sea grass beds. Sheet 3 of the Woods Consulting dock plan drawings show where these sea grass beds are in relation to the dock project. The dock, as designed, will have minimal to no adverse impacts to the marine environment. The proposed docks are designed to not have boats traveling or mooring over sea grass beds. Additionally, the fixed dock approach is only 4 ft wide to minimize shading impacts to submerged resources. By moving the floating dock out past the sea grass beds, it also provides greater depths for boat mooring to ensure minimum water depths of 3 ft at mean low water. Boats mooring at the dock will have a minimum of 1 ft clearance between the deepest draft and the marine bottom at mean low water. Therefore boats do not rest on the marine bottom during low tides and do not cause prop scarring of sea grass beds or the marine bottom. The applicant is also proposing to install (1) "Florida Friendly Boating" sign for manatee awareness, (1) "Caution Manatee" sign and (1) "Caution Seagrass" sign to inform boaters of protected resources in the area. e. Impacts on water quality. All turning basin, boat mooring areas and any other area associated with use of the dock will have adequate circulation and existing water depths to ensure that a minimum of a one foot clearance is provided between the lowest member of a vessel and the bottom at mean low water. The fixed dock approach, ramp and floating docks will not cause erosion, extraordinary storm drainage, shoaling of channels, or adversely affect the water quality presently existing in the area or limit progress that is being made toward improvement of water quality in the area in which the dock is � proposed. The mooring of short-term transient vessels at the facility is not expected to adversely impact water quality. The new floating docks will be installed using pre-treated pilings that are vinyl-wrapped from the mud-line to 2 ft above the mean high water line to prevent leaching of copper, arsenic and/or chromium from the timber into the water. Also, there are no fueling, no marine service activities, no wash-racks, no commercial activities, etc. that would contribute to a water quality problem. The restaurant will also provide trash receptacles that will be emptied daily by staff. , f. Impacts on natural resources. The dock will not have a material adverse impact upon the conservation of wildlife, marine life, � J and other natural resources, including beaches and shores, so as to be contrary to the public interest. The dock will not have an adverse impact on vegetated areas; vegetative, terrestrial, or aquatic habitats critical to the support of listed species. As previously stated above, sea grass beds are avoided by moving the dock out away from the seawall. The fixed dock approach is only 4 ft wide to limit shading over sea grass and the dock is in deeper water where there is a minimum of 1 ft clearance between the deepest draft of a vessel and the marine bottom at mean low water. q. Impacts on wetlands habitat/uplands. The dock will not have a material adverse affect upon the uplands surroundings. There are no upland wetlands, only surface waters and submerged vegetation at the site. The docks are located to avoid the submerged resources. h. Dimensional standards. The dimensional standards for commercial docks are determined by the length of shoreline owned by the applicant. Setbacks for commercial docks shall be located so that the setback from any property line as extended into the water shall be a minimum of 10% of the applicant's waterfront property measured from the side property lines. The proposed dock meets the required side setbacks based on the shoreline of the new restaurant parcel being 100 ft. The side setbacks as proposed are 10 ft on either side. The width for commercial docks shall not exceed 75% of the applicant's waterFront property measured from the side property lines. The proposed dock is wider than allowed based on the shoreline of the new restaurant parcel being 100 ft. Based on a shoreline of 100 ft, the maximum width allowed is 75 ft which is not quite wide enough to use the interior mooring areas of the proposed dock. The goal in widening the dock was to be as wide as possible to gain more distance on the interior of the "U-shaped"dock but not extend beyond the required side setbacks. In doing so, the dock is 79 ft wide which is 79% the width of the shoreline—a 4% variance to what is allowed. The length for commercial docks shall not extend from the mean high water line or seawall of the applicant's property more than 75% of the width of the applicant's property measured at the waterFront property line. The length of the proposed dock in this case is being calculated using the combined shoreline of the contiquous waterfront properties owned bv the applicant, which is approximately 300 linear feet. The combined shoreline allows a dock length of 225 ft which is insufficient because of the sea grass beds that are present along the shoreline and must be avoided for docking. The presence of the sea grass beds and the need for adequate water depth has the docks pushed out from the seawall approximately 45 ft. The maximum additional length that can be requested with a variance is 50% of the maximum length allowed 50% of 225 ft is 112.5 additional feet. The applicant is not requesting the maximum length variance allowed per code but rather only an additional 75 ft for an overall dock length of 300 ft. The applicant acknowledges and agrees to the City of Clearwater placing deed restrictions on the properties used to achieve the 300 ft length with such deed restrictions limiting the use of those properties with regards to docks. In return for being able to use the combined shoreline in calculating the 4 dock length, the applicant is building a public boardwalk along the combined shoreline even though the new restaurant, the Oasis Motel and the existing seafood company are not required to build a boardwalk. The boardwalk will improve waterfront pedestrian access and meets a vital goal of the City to have a continuous boardwalk along the East Shore developments of the Marina District. Written Submittal Requirements Flexible Development Application General Applicability Criteria 1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale bulk coveraqe densitv and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. The proposed commercial dock will be in character of the adjacent properties. The commercial dock will provide slips to restaurant patrons. The existing parcels along East Shore Drive are a mix of hotels, a seafood company and residential properties. The use of the existing docks in the immediate area are tied to their respective upland uses such that hotel docks can only be used by hotel guests, residential docks can only be used by the resident unit owners and the restaurant docks can only be used by the commercial fishing boats and the restaurant patrons. As the proposed commercial dock will be for use only by the restaurant guests, this use is consistent with the adjacent properties. The proposed commercial dock will be in harmony with the scale, bulk and coverage of the docks in the immediate area even with an increased length as requested. As proposed, the commercial dock is 300 ft in length which is similar in size to the docks in the immediate area that are already built or have been approved by the City but not yet built. The usable portion of the dock is approximately 250 ft long and attached to the seawall via a 45 ft fixed dock approach and a ramp. The docks are moved out and away from the seawall to avoid boaters using the area in close proximity to submerged resources, particularly the sea grass beds. In addition to moving the docks out away from the sea grass beds, the variance for length will allow the maximum number of wet slips providing the maximum use of the waterFront in this area of Clearwater that has been designated as a Marina District. As regards the existing docks in the immediate area, please see the attached Woods Consulting Exhibit 1. This exhibit was created to show the proposed docks in relation to the existing docks in the immediate area as well as some docks that have been approved by the City of Clearwater but not yet constructed. As noted previously, • Immediately to the north of the project site is Papaya St., a right of way (R.O.W.). There currently are no docks on this R.O.W. • The property immediately to the north of Papaya St. is 443 East Shore Dr. This property combined with 463 East Shore Dr. was approved by the City for a commercial dock that is 275 ft in length. The docks have not yet been constructed. 5 • The property to the north of 463 East Shore Dr. is the East Shore Resort. The East Shore Resort recently built their docks that are approximately 250 ft in length. • At the north end of the exhibit are the Belle Harbour Condominiums that currently have docks that are approximately 332 ft in length as measured from the seawall. • The property to the south of the project site is the Oasis Motel. This dock is used as fishing pier and will remain for the hotel guests. The proposed public boardwalk will actually connect and pass through this dock. • To the south of the Oasis Motel is the seafood dock located at 419 East Shore Dr. that extends into Clearwater Harbor approximately 273 ft. The seafood dock provides transient mooring for restaurant patrons and permanent mooring for commercial fishing vessels. • The upland property to the south of the seafood docks is 411 East Shore Dr. The property is vacant but has an existing dock that is approximately 60 ft in length. The city approved a new commercial docking facility for docks that are 318 ft in length. The docks have not yet been constructed. • Other docks built within Clearwater Harbor include the Barefoot Bay commercial docks that extend 250 ft in length and the Island Way Yacht Club's commercial docks that extend 400 ft in length into the waterway. Therefore the use of the commercial dock will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of the area as envisioned by Beach by Design and in size is similar to the existing docks or docks that have been approved but not yet constructed. 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and building or significantly impair the value thereof. The proposed commercial dock will not hinder or discourage appropriate use and development of adjacent land or impair the value thereof. In fact, the docks will significantly improve the value of the surrounding properties. The proposed commercial dock will not hinder or discourage development at adjacent properties as the proposed dock meets the required side setbacks. Although variances for length and width are being requested, the proposed length is consistent with several large existing and approved docks in Clearwater Harbor. The width is needed to provide the maximum maneuvering distance between the docks without crossing into setback areas. The proposed commercial dock will allow maximum use of the waterfront for this property and meets the vision of a Marina District for this area. Additionally, the proposed dock does not impede ingress or egress to the neighboring docks and does not impede navigation in Mandalay Channel. Much care and consideration was given to ensure the proposed dock would not impede use of the waterway in this area. 6 3. The proposed development will not adverselv affect the health or safetv of persons residing or workinq in the neiqhborhood of the proposed use The proposed commercial dock will be for the use by the patrons of the upland restaurant. A docking assistant will be available during peak hours to assist boaters using the dock. The restaurant will establish rules and regulations and such regulations often address appropriate behavior, enforcing proper use of boating equipment, enforcing proper use boating and navigation waterways, boater education and environmental education. 4. The proposed development is designed to avoid traffic congestion. The proposed commercial dock will be for the use of the restaurant patrons and therefore no additional traffic will be created with the proposed dock. In fact, the ability for restaurant guests to arrive by boat actually decreases traffic congestion. 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinitv of the parcel proposed for development. The proposed dock is consistent with the zoning, future land use and Beach by Design. The proposed dock is consistent with the size and scale of large docks that are located in the immediate area. The Clearwater Beach area is dependent on the waterfront developments to attract tourists and residents to the area. By having wet slips available to the restaurant guests, the proposed dock will improve the community character of the area. 6. The desiqn of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects including visual acoustic and olfactorv and hours of operation impacts on the adiacent properties There will be no negative adverse effects visually as the docks will be constructed as either aluminum, wood or concrete floating docks fixed in place by wooden pilings. The construction materials and installation requirements will adhere to the Pinellas County dock construction code. There will be no negative adverse effects acoustically as this will operate only as a commercial dock for restaurant guests. There are no high/dry slips, no load out, no wash racks, no fueling facilities, etc. With so few wet slips, there, there is little noise expected to be generated. The hours of operation of the dock will be established by the restaurant management and will be enforced. There will be no adverse olfactory effects as there is no fixed sewage pumpout station or upland holding tanks proposed, trash receptacles will be emptied by employees daily to make sure there are no garbage odors, and there will be no fish cleaning stations onsite. 7 STORMWATER NA1tRATIV� 441 East Shore Drive This project consists of two (2) parcels which total 0.51 acres, which includes the intracoastal water area. The stormwater design will be in compliance with the guidelines set forth from the City of Clearwater and The Southwest Florida Water Management District (SWFWMD). Stormwater runoff for the site will be captured, treated and released at less than the pre-development rate utilizing a concrete vault (at grade level under the elevated building foundation) along with a control structure that outfalls into the Clearwater Harbor. The subject site stormwater quality and rate of runoff will be improved over the current existing site drainage conditions in which stormwater runoff sheet flows in various directions from the property but eventually outfalls to Clearwater Harbor. The proposed drainage system will collect and convey stormwater runoff to the vault storage area at the rear of the site and eventually discharge into Clearwater Harbor. --- — .._------- --_---____.. _ _ �' I - - � g _ I � � � _ � 5 a .� _ a � � � i � ! � � � � + � i � I � __ � � � � � �� _.._.____�__ . T. � � K 5 �-�- �-�- � �• � �.� ��: � � � � �` �� z��,,�� tir��a �ii,�w� i�lfil II �fY�:y� � � � � � ' — -- _ � � _, � � � __ _ ___ �i___._1 ,_ �f Copyright.All rights re5erved-no part of thi5 document may be reproduced in any form without permie5ion of Klar and Klar Architect5,inc. klar and klar architect5 inc. date: 28473 u.5. 19 n. 5te. 602 clearwater, fl 33761 (727) 799-5420 fax (727) 799-9625 G��t.�Z ., e-mail: info@klarklar.com project: drawing no.: I klar and klar architects inc. ��. ��` 'C C��A�..n ,►_ (/1� C�� C�� 1 FIG� � �l'�l..l �K{,r tJPNI: SCALE: 1" = 300 FT EXHI BIT 1 . EXISTI NG AN D PROPOSED DOCKS �g , �;�'., .�� .�+ �� .•�� .�� - �!�: . h�--e ; . .`. `r'. t�- � ✓^^ 3' i _ ��Ia�{\��'�'� , . ` _e BELLE HARBOUR . ' � r,`^ ��— � rY .��jr ��' -!�:� � � ,� 1�� ,,� ,.� .:.�. � :� , '•�,,,� _,�---�----- �; ' , ..4� .,�y^ 1 � � '�j w 11 1 � .: x � • �, . �� . tr �',,� � !. _�. . � ., . a , , . u�r, r: A � � � I i '' � � � �* r � , ,� � ��' �... e4` �r . � � w . , „ _ ,� 't� �•i$%t�l'. ; � � 4' i �; �� ' � . � .� . �. � � , � �I� � . 'I,: � � � �� 473 EAST SH10RE DR b� ��`�� 3, ? ��{� �� r� • "' �� ` , .,�., �'r �t � �� ±��p t i-" �t '�� ^�..°�� , , . , ,. � , _ � . . : � �. "1 ' *� - : � � . .. �� 1 �;- ,� _ " , �; � , � h c - , �e � 443/463 EAST SHORE DR _�; �°„ ( � �I ` �m ♦ , � � ,: . µ �� 1 � ��b , �� ,"uU H g�a��'�. �' ��: 'A+sn.t � p�� ,� t �� . ��.. -e, .� . � 1 ..... : , # �� . 4 � �, "��`, ��;� ��"�� 425/441 �AST SHORE DR •�-�� F � ti i� � I " �% 'r, .. �„r..�, ��^� ';p,', -_ j �. i ��. -w"'., ;it° � .:.. � . � ' 1• ". I 419 EAST SHORE DR �.., � � ' �'r; , �'' � . ��° �,t . �i, ,� ��l �� ... �� -�� 1 a.#`.�r,Y+'' �'a�`�`� � . sg��. �r � ' 'X 411 EAST SHORE DR � ' �� •° s v� �, + � � �a c�-� �4 y- � /�� 4 . — �, : '�'�" � �r * �.�a t�� `a ,� •- , `� �� a .�t��;� .��s;.��*'�'�� i '" fi�p *` „t-':.�,t� i� ,.+3 "; ; a a°r�'x '� _ �� ,�,,�. ��r� � � �.. �� a 'f" � �� ^ � _ 9 i � �`�� ` .. � � �. .�e � t { 2F . `'�a �° �'*,*t zac' a.. �,�,�. �r �' �. � �BAREFOOT BAY : � -- J ?r 1 �e �,�� r�. �r�' �� ;�� ,� � �� :� � T � `�� o ��r� � ,� � �� . � °1�RIVE ^E F �' � z e� z � .� s�-�,,��s i:��,., 'h�' � '�n �► R ♦".q -�i - +�t'� �,' �.-" � �:" �- , ..� .. � .... r.��-.r, �'9 _.. � �. as � .��,y4�'{�ltllt��" y��t��'��4rti:t4r3 j�jl��'� r,i�� ,�, •' r ... � _ � �. �t� .�.. -@- �' #` . �-.»" " , -�^ = ' - '��-s°n'�-, _.. "� e .� _- w _.. �� '.� w _ � — ca,� , dj'�r � , , . -�-�-�-�� "�, n BR�DC'E,r �� y,:, �� ,... ` �•. �^._-_-..,_,.,�..'-. -- � • .�� `� 9Q n� � „�� )�t ,�x � � - ' _ � r ,� � 4 t � e �� :._:��' •. �Y:��' � �,:` � �~�� "� �, .+,. , , ,-• �,a�.�t �� , ``�. !� ' .. " .� f e �, � ��-� ° r-- t � :��*4�i1' ►.' _� .ti..: .� M {� . 'Y 9. ��.+,�� 1. +, '!l�'4� •�.�' .,a. '�, �` '�11,� . .. �5�. .. � *": . . ,...,,.. ��„j�l� �, Fri,27 Apr 2012-4:30pm F:\PROJECTS\Frenchy's Motel Docks(513-11)\CAD\WOODS DR,4WINGS�FRENCHYS MASTER REV 4 FINAL.dwg PRESTON DOCKS EXISTING AND PROPOSED WOODS CONSULTING DOCKS IN RELATION TO 1714 COUMY ROAD 1, s�� 2� NAVIGATION AND WIDTH PH.N 727� 786 5747 F� �'2', 'efi—'4'9 O F WATE RWAY � R � , c TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY FOR FRENCHY'S RESTAURANT 441 EAST SHORE DRIVE CLEARWATER BEACH, FLORIDA PREPARED FOR: KLAR& KLAR, INC. PREPARED BY: GULF COAST CONSULTING, INC. APRIL 2012 PROJECT # 12-020 obert Pergoliz ', � P, PTP AICP #9023, PTP #133 �' 4 A I. INTRODUCTION The 0.32 acre project site is located along the east side of East Shore Drive immediately south of Papaya Street and currently contains an 18 room motel. (See Figure 1). The site is proposed to be redeveloped as a restaurant project to contain 10,037 square feet. The redevelopment of the property is the subject of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment in the Tourist "T" zoning district. This application requires an assessment of the traffic impacts of development. Prior to completing this analysis a methodology was established with the City of Clearwater staff. II. EXISTING TRAFFIC CONDITIONS The property has frontage on East Shore Drive and Papaya Street and both roadways which are two-lane local roads. Mandalay Avenue is a four-lane divided collector roadway between the roundabout and Baymont Street. Coronado Drive is four lanes between the roundabout and S. Gulfview Boulevard, and Causeway Boulevard is a four-lane divided arterial roadway. As agreed to by Clearwater staff, traffic counts that were conducted for the Hooters on Clearwater Beach project were used as a basis for this analysis. These intersection turning movement counts were conducted between 11 AM - 2 PM and 4 - 6 PM on Friday May 20, 2011 at the following intersections: Causeway Boulevard/East Shore Drive Mandalay Avenue/Baymont Street Coronado Drive/ S. Gulfview Boulevard In addition, supplemental intersection turning movement counts were conducted on Friday April 13, 2012 between 11 AM — 2 PM and 4-6 PM at the following locations: East Shore Drive/Papaya Street Poinsettia Avenue/Papaya Street All traffic counts were converted to annual average equivalents using FDOT seasonal adjustment factors. Existing traffic volumes are shown in Figure 2. Existing intersections were analyzed using the HCS+ software. The HCS+ printouts are included in Appendix A. At the intersection of Causeway Boulevaxd / East Shore Drive the primary movements are eastbound-westbound, whereas the southbound approach (East Shore Drive) is stop controlled. The HCS+ analysis shows the southbound stop- controlled movements operate at LOS B during both the midday peak hour and the PM peak hour. 1 � s 1 .�. ,: ; .�{��,y r .,, , -, - ..� i ' L y�W n: .�� t`R �`1 ` 1 -' � .a � i �, 1 I �... { � �� F k� �S G:� . ,i� ' , ��" 1J �'. �!�F'� � .,�IJ k�',�''�*� �"T� i � -f� .�. 1- r� ' 0 r�i.c�'�°� �, .�, � tj--�(--$l.�-;.. ��,' j � ..j, �� ;,�� ;�:' � - �,� t , � ��-��„ �� .� � _ �. ° < ,� f .,T ,� . ; . �---.�. �.�, --R- « ��: , ; - ,,. . ��'� PROJECT � � � � < <�� x tfi � �"'" i " M ~ ��'OCATION r .t �..,,�' `_ ,'�`� �r r � � . ��y } ,�� ^�� ' %. �#- ir�` a....r � ��' �t �e y� �1 i� �! � ��, .�� E �� r�t� "'6 P1 jZf '� �y i�.. I� ,, � � �� e�M /_.f �` � � ;� ��, ; �� ', ' � � ' �� ' ��_ y,' � �`'a, I , `,_4 � '� : � ,i' 4 .r.�i N' +ps �.`. ��: �.{•1,{ � . '�- ""� R� b��+ �.:.�. .: .j Mj'F�� L�7. t . ------ '� x a:_�i �t ,ra.� �g *I` e,'. �i,; J, � f ti z • � $ E� ' a �"°1 I I �'j� I ' � �i '''llli�4° i�� e�� 'r" �.�� - �� . � >.�wi. �' ��` I �� i��i�� '°�i . .- �� .;a�,�,4la'� :�: ; _ , ?� + �r`. `�"�.rt�1,�� *' -�".�!'�;��;; a ,�,-� n �t > J ��.'�'a , . '�E 1' �:.a i �� f. j�� '� _ II° �at . i ti�t 1� �"�'"S._� r I y� .' �� ',�� "�2;.�" ,�'';�,,� � � � ��^_; t �-s"'t� '%� ..��.3•'rr� h: �x .'� f--'—_— '� � t ,�J'L`�.5� � al�. . '� `7,c �.� i � ,+�,� ct� �-�,•'�i �- t : - - �� . . '� � � et d=,�� . . F �y.� a[,y' � 1 '� . . . P ]Ii ___ 1 `�4a ! •_Y�� ..��.�. �° �.�u +-'� � � �� ' � f ��i a�� •� .. '��,� .. . �-- T � k � ,�. � ��.k =��,�t. � � � �s � ��F tn Fp. ":��5 � "� �1. r '�y F 1 � ��r� � %; ..,�1� � .. . � � ��':,. .�dt *�. � ��,'[`'� ��d.� ��.1� , � � _c �•- . 1. ,4, `�Po[t ,�- i �• - � F , ,. r � • � . � �{ �� iil��r�,� � '��'I� �� .r e�� y ��, Ey��1., « .�-�i� ,�+ . c `7'- r� � _� i� . � � '� - ° "f�+� � ��,,E� *h ' ' � � ,; ��:-1��F', � :��,��- � �_ � E�.. / 4 6 k 5 ��.'!�.�.wF' � .' �. �,e,� :_ r� �:-��'� a _�iR,�,�w.�••. ; r� � �� s t _. . ^3+' � � .� � / r^• � a�,y� �rt , } * .. „ °`�" � � ��';�'� �r1"' ,��d",.�D � I ; • ,� � � �� F r�34 ,�, a �� s, �` �'.��.°�,F "�'�'! � r, � - �. . � ' � ��?�� ,4'` ,�� 4�� ' P m � �� ' ��{� s �` ? � . '• �' � _ ��'�.�� ;r �� :, t r��/ � �`�-' ** t- {l��i!'�� ,�; � ' ;' # �:f i:� �.—��` s ��. . ,� � -:�r , " R �a ,� •�� _ �6 . �,,0 ,_.... . . i.... . + �.v, , ,� d a E . �. . ..'�., ' ��: � - "L_ ,�� . � �a - , [ �a R � ,+._ r . � ,`T,� '��t�'4 �� l� S �� 5 � � �'`� . ]��y _, a �� .w..�y I � �I � S � �...I 1 I.�' y�W ��,R '�1�:�T�'��P��H�� +� ""'_ _�.r� ...._... ._. i . d�, . _ .�; .__._ ._..... _ _._.�..�.�„ .... � I 1 sy+I�{ �'1-� � _ 3 � �J F . � ^ .�e�ICf`�F.� , i � , a ---.._.. . I ♦ • ��' � +Y,.��pa �� ",�� T` ;: --- --- �, *� . , ; o ,_ 4 \ { !� +,F•' y � i:�' ,� ��f+��'� � ��, � ` z�.� , , , . � �.. �,� i . � ,�_ � , (t s�t��,„� �t•`.�*"�'�At�.'E`"Y�r� - - `� ,,,.: � - -�_'_—'-- ��• �� '� �,�� !��l l'}i61"1 � �l�� ' � `LE!', ��J ry . , � \ ':� . � i , '� M�.� 4�� a. � �.t ' .�� .. .r ��6�.r iS�� _ a ; � J • f�. :F ��r . .:� L� , - '�.a,�'' � �' �,. � �/ �,^ .�`°,,�,j, � s� .�s � �' . �: �r�,. < Y, � � . � � � •� �� c�'!Ek 'F 6� � ` 1 +T�� .� { = �n� �tiY2i''� {y r� � -+� 7� q.,,,,/�� . ..� --I— ti �..S�E � �-�,y i; o �`;. � �'*�R�r il a�M_,?�,.`�p.�".t�l,rfty-!JI`:.:: � '~ 9. r� �' - � � f a��l` rF �sliZfJ'.;J1 � _ i � J!! . ,�'�" -� i •�� - ; ;� � � ,w�`;�t 2 ..' ,� � �� i'��i� � i �� .��a,�, � i ; h,r� �,r , � I� ,I ,�r :l �* �. i IIF--M��y� I .;�i - iuli�, I s � ��^'' = �' �;�, �3��' � i ;,r �� , -- �� a 3 � ' , � 4'�""ct`�`.� F Y I j I�I ,� � � 1 •: 0 � ,,�: �� , ° PROJECT LOCATION Y'Z°JE�TNO: 12-020 o �; :� - • DATE: FIGURE: €�� Gulf Coast Consulting, Inc. � Land Development Consulting 4�201 2 � � � �a � � -- — — - a� ` DRAWN BY: g MKC z t 1 � � � � ^N N� �(119)108 M � ^ �� (5)12 � I � �(19)30 � BAYMONT ST ,z�>>� � f r 3(8)--� �o v 49(41)� N v� a co � N I� M N I� � chi o N �� 1 �� v u� m � S`�MARCO ST � �� ,� (zz)za � � � � �— (11)11 � � �(12)9 PAPAYA ST �N a ,z ,o� � t r � � Q 5�g��' �n r%� � c��o � � 8�� N � /� °' v1 � � �^N � �rt O �� N �O �z�� O � N O�: �_/O\O / � � SAPAYA �-J i � ��Z�� _ � ' / � H � 6�Z> � q�l f ly o i(6) � n N� R, 17(17) � � � v � � °' �-- `- "� ,� � � v �(117)130 (a�o) N° � � �—(753)748 878 CAUSEWAY `�j � vi� �8�0, �S�o, BLV� W �,�� 1106 1106 ��'6�2 ��ao�$ MARINA � �o Q � � O �� rn v � °' z �� o v D U (XX) = MID-DAY PEAK HOUR ��' XX = PM PEAK HOUR � 285(246)� � � ,�� 10(26)� � � o � �C cMo � � � a � -•co �� ^ � � M u) `� PROJECT NO: EXISTING PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUME (2012) 12-020 Gulf Coast Consulting, Inc. DATE: FIGURE: ' Land Development Consulting 4�201 2 � � ae� �`'� DRAWN BY: ' �:m MKC _ - - - t Y � Presently the signalized intersection at Mandalay Avenue / Baymont Street operates at LOS A with average delay of 7.4 seconds per vehicle during the midday peak hour, and LOS A with average delay of 7.5 seconds per vehicle during the PM peak hour. Presently the signalized intersection at Coronado Drive / S. Gulfview Boulevard Street operates at LOS A with average delay of 9.5 seconds per vehicle during the midday peak hour, and LOS A with average delay of 9.7 seconds per vehicle during the PM peak hour. At the East Shore Drive / papaya Street intersection all movements operate at LOS A with minimal delay in both the mid-day and PM peak hours. At the Papaya Street / Poinsettia Avenue intersection all movements operate at LOS A with minimal delay during both the mid-day and PM peak hours. Causeway Boulevard is a four-lane divided arterial roadway and according to FDOT 2009 QLOS Handbook capacity tables has a LOS D capacity of 3,560 vehicles per hour. The segment of Mandalay Avenue is a four-lane divided collector roadway with a LOS D capacity of 2,900 vehicles per hour, and Coronado Drive between the roundabout and S. Gulfview Boulevard is a four- lane divided collector roadway with a LOS D capacity of 2,900 vehicles per hour, and Coronado Drive south of S. Gulfview Boulevard is three lanes with a capacity of 1,550 vehicles per hour. EXISTING ROADWAY CONDITIONS - 2012 Roadway Se ent Midday peak Midday LOS PM peak PM LOS Causeway Blvd 1740 vph LOS B 1984 vph LOS B Mandalay Ave. 813 vph LOS C 910 vph LOS C Coronado Dr. 1325 vph LOS C 1480 vph LOS C Coronado Dr(S.of Gulfview) 757 vph LOS C 929 vph LOS C East Shore(Cswy—Papaya) 199 vph LOS C 218 vph LOS C As shown above all roadway segments and intersections operate at LOS C or better during both the midday and PM peak hours. III. FUTURE TRAFFIC CONDITIONS Existing traffic was adjusted by a 4% annual growth rate to the expected build-out year of 2013 to account for background traffic from other nearby redevelopment projects. In addition, expected traffic from the approved Hooters on Clearwater Beach development, traffic from the approved #400 East Shore Drive project, and traffic from the approved East Shore Hotel was added as background traffic. 2 e � Using Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation, 8�' Edition rates, the amount of new trips was calculated and estimates are shown below: TRIP GENERATION ESTIMATES Land Use ITE LUC Amount Dailv Mid-Da� PM Peak Sit-Down Restaurant 932 10,037 sf 1276 186(100/86) 112(66/46) Based on prior studies of businesses on Clearwater Beach a substantial amount of the customers are expected to be walk-ups from nearby hotels, the beach itself, and condominiums in the area. The data from previous studies indicates 38% of the customers of beach businesses are staying in nearby hotels or used another mode of transportation other than a car such as walking, biking, or Jolly Trolley. The gross vehicle trip generation was reduced by 38%to account for this capture, and as a result it is estimated the actual vehicle trip generation would be 115 midday peak hour trips (62 entering / 53 exiting), and 69 PM peak hour trips (41 entering/28 exiting). The expected distribution of vehicular trins is as follows: 10%to/from the north 30%to/from the south 60%to /from the east PROJECT IMPACT CALCULATIONS (MIDDAY PEAK HOUR) Project Road Seexnent Lanes Proiect Trips Capacity Percent Causeway Blvd. (Roundabout-Island way) 4LD 69 3560 1.94% Mandalay Ave. (Roundabout—Baymont) 4LD 11 2900 038% Coronado Drive(Roundabout—Gulfview) 4LD 35 2900 1.21% Coronado Drive(Hamden.—Gulfview) 2LD 35 1550 2.26% Background traffic and project traffic vehicular traffic were added to determine total traffic for 2013 and the intersections and roadway segments were reanalyzed. The future traffic volumes are shown in Figure 3, and the HCS+ printouts are included in Appendix B. At the intersection of Causeway Boulevard /East Shore Drive the HCS+ analysis shows the southbound stop-controlled movements would continue to operate at LOS B during both the midday peak hour and the PM peak hour. Under future conditions the signalized intersection at Mandalay Avenue / Baymont Street would operate at LOS A with average delay of 7.4 seconds per vehicle during the midday peak hour, and LOS A with average delay of 7.5 seconds per vehicle during the PM peak hour. 3 [ N � ` � ^7 °�^ �(124)112 �� ro � �� (5)12 I I I �(zo)3� BAYMONT ST _.-J � �--- ,z��>� � � r 3(8)� r�in � o} 51(44)� �N� �� ' N N�� 7 OJ � �� VN � � � � � S�MARCO ST � �� ^N � (22)z4 w � --(is)ia q � � � � �(60)34 � SITE PE�AYA ST MID-DAY 115(62/53) � PM 69(41/28) � 12(10}--� � i r � q� 9(15}--� �M v � � 8(7)� �� ' � / � � / W N �° �� i °�� ---(ss)2a � PAPAYA � sT fl � ly ��z'° — — ' � _ � � i6(15)� q� f r O 17(31)� �N� p„ °' 60� 17(17)� � `� � � � m � � O ,,� � N � � � � �(z3s)zia (�o��) � 0° �--(835)809 ��27 CAUSEWAY � " � v N (1059) (1059) BLVD w �� 1254 1254 ��0 '7/ ��g� � A g� MARINA � � N O N ^ �N N `° � z �� + o x v D O (XX) = MID-DAY PEAK HOUR 4jS' XX = PM PEAK HOUR �� 296(256)� � � � 10(27) � �n ,, � o u�i � � y � '� � N O � � � � �t � � � PROJECT NO: FUTURE PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUME (2013) 12-020 � � Gulf Coast Consulting, Inc. DATE: FIG�: � ,_ �-� Land Development Consulting 4�201 2 � �� DRAWN BY: ,� �_ � �.�,: �;,, MKC t T 7 Under future condrtions the signalized mtersection at Coronado Drive / S. Gulfview Boulevard would operate at LOS A with average delay of 9.6 seconds per vehicle during the midday peak hour, and LOS A with average delay of 9.8 seconds per vehicle during the PM peak hour. At the East Shore Drive / Papaya Street intersection the northbound and southbound left turns would operate at LOS A, and the eastboundlwestbound approaches would operate at LOS B. At the Poinsettia Avenue / Papaya Street intersection the northbound and southbound left turns would operate at LOS A, and the eastbound/westbound approaches would operate at LOS B. FUTURE ROADWAY CONDITIONS - 2013 Roadway Se..m�ent Midday�eak Midda, L�OS_ PM peak PM LOS Causeway Blvd 2130 vph LOS B 2281 vph LOS B Mandalay Ave. 890 vph LOS C 974 vph LOS C Coronado Dr. 1535 vph LOS C 1645 vph LOS C Coronado Dr(S: of Gulfview) 945 vph LOS C 1062 vph LOS C East Shore(Cswy—Papaya) 322 vph LOS C 306 vph LOS C As shown above all roadway segments and intersections would continue to operate at LOS C or better during both the midday and PM peak hours. IV. CONCLUSION This analysis was conducted in accordance with a specific methodology established with City of Clearwater staff. This analysis demonstrates traffic operations at nearby intersections and on adjacent roadways would continue at acceptable levels of service with the Frenchy's restaurant during both midday and PM peak hours. 4 t r 1 APPENDIX A -____, - .. ._ __ - C ------- ,..__.. .. ��.,_ �-`" ___�. _M..____,. �-_ _ __� Page 1 of 1 Robert Pergolizzi . From: Robert Pergolizzi Sent: Monday, April 09, 2012 9:45 AM To: 'Himanshu.Patni@MyClearwater.com' Subject: Frenchy's#441 East Shore Drive Himanshu -This is a followup from a phone call we had a few weeks ago confirming methodology for a traffic study for Frenchy's to be located at#441 East Shore Drive (near Papaya St). We will be able to use traffic counts from 2011 conducted for other projects. These are Causeway/East Shore, Mandalay/Baymont and Coronado/S. Gulfiriew. However,we will be collecting intersection turning movement counts for Papaya/Poinsettia and Papaya/East Shoe to supplement our base data. To be consistent with the other counts we will collect data from 11 AM -2 PM and again at 4-6 PM on a Friday. I will include expected traffic from my previous studies as background traffic. (ie: Hooter, Walgreens#400 East Shore, and East Shore Hotel) and will then add the project traffic from the proposed Frenchy's restaurant to calculate total future traffic. A report will be prepared and submitted for review. Robert Pergolizzi, AICP, PTP Gulf Coast Consulting, Inc. 13825 ICOT Boulevard, Suite 605 Clearwater, FI 33760 Phone: 727-524-1818 Fax: 727-524-6090 Cellphone: 727-644-2695 email: pergo@gulfcoastconsultinginc.com 4/12/2012 2010 Peak Season Factor Category Report - Report Type: ALL Category: 1500 PINELLAS COUNTYWIDE MOCF: 0.95 � Week Dates SF PSCF 1 Ol/01/2010 - 01/02/2010 1.10 1.16 2 O1/03/2010 - Ol/09/2010 1.09 1.14 3 01/10/2010 - Ol/16/2010 1.08 1.13 4 O1/17/2010 - O1/23/2010 1.06 1.11 5 O1/24/2010 - O1/30/z010 1.04 1.09 6 O1/31/2010 - 02/06/2010 1.03 1.08 7 02/07/2010 - 02/13/2010 1.01 1.06 8 02/14/2010 - 02/20/2010 0.99 1.04 * 9 02/21/2010 - 02/27/2010 0_98 1.03 *10 02/28/2010 - 03/06/2010 0_96 1.01 *11 03/07/2010 - 03/13/z010 0.95 1.00 *12 03/14/2010 - 03/20/2010 0.94 0.99 *13 03/21/2010 - 03/27/2010 0.93 0.98 *14 03/28/2010 - 04/03/2010 0.93 0.98 *15 04/04/2010 - 04/10/2010 0.93 0.98 *16 04/11/2010 - 04/17/2010 0.93 �� *17 04/18/2010 - 04/24/2010 0.94 0.99 *18 04/25/2010 - O5/O1/2010 0.96 1.01 *19 OS/02/2010 - OS/08/2010 0.97 1.02 *20 OS/09/2010 - OS/15/2010 0.98 1.03 *21 05/16/2010 - OS/22/2010 0.98 1.03 22 OS/23/2010 - OS/29/2010 0.99 1.04 23 OS/30/2010 - 06/OS/2010 0.99 1.04 24 06/06/2010 - 06/12/2010 0.99 1.04 ' 25 06/13/2010 - 06/19/2010 0.99 1.04 26 06/20/2010 - 06/26/2010 1.00 1.05 27 06/27/2010 - 07/03/2010 1.00 1.05 28 07/04/2010 - 07/10/2010 1.00 1.05 29 07/11/2010 - 07/17/2010 1.01 1.06 30 07/18/2010 - 07/24/2010 1.01 1.06 31 07/25/2010 - 07/31/2010 1.01 1.06 . 32 08/O1/2010 - 08/07/2010 1.02 1.07 33 08/08/2010 - 08/14/2010 1_02 1.07 34 08/15/2010 - OB/21/2010 1.03 1.08 35 08/22/2010 - 08/28/2010 1.03 1.08 36 OB/29/2010 - 09/04/2010 1.04 1.09 37 09/OS/2010 - 09/11/2010 1.05 1.10 = 38 09/12/2010 - 09/18/2010 1.05 1.10 39 09/19/2010 - 09/25/2010 1.05 1.10 40 09/26/2010 - 10/02/2010 1.04 1.09 41 10/03/2010 - 10/09/2010 1.03 1.08 42 10/10/2010 - 10/16/2010 1.03 1.08 43 10/17/2010 - 10/23/2010 1.04 1.09 44 10/24/2010 - 10/30/2010 1.04 1.09 45 10/31/2010 - 11/06/2010 1.05 1.10 46 11/07/2010 - 11/13/2010 1.06 1.11 47 11/14/2010 - 11/20/2010 1.07 1.12 48 11/21/2010 - 11/27/2010 1.07 1.12 49 11/28/2010 - 12/04/2010 1.08 1_13 50 12/O5/2010 - 12/11/2010 1.09 1.14 51 12/12/2010 - 12/18/2010 1.10 1.16 52 12/19/2010 - 12/25/2010 1.09 1.14 53 12/26/2010 - 12/31/2010 1.08 1.13 * Peak Season Page 1 of 2 . Type of peak hour being reported:Intersection Peak Method for determining peak hour:Total Entering Volume LdCATi€Q�6: E Shore Dr--Causeway Blvd C�C.�f�B#: 10618702 GITYfS'FATi E: Clearwater Beach FL QATE: 5/20/2011 za o.�z �z� Peak-Hour: 1:00 PM--2:00 PM � s t � Peak 15-Min: 1:45 PM--2:00 PM s �r 24 0 0 O.D 0.0 0.0 � i 4 .J i 4 B00�0 .! !, 121 �897 3.4 4 0.0 � ;��,. R, 1•7« 3.2 0.91 897�► 0.97 �+ 776 0.94 4.2 �► `'"�,�4 3.5 `•;�r.•,,:.,.. as7•►o 'Z t o�► es7 ��.� „t t �. - a.z w a.o 7 v o.o+► az h R r' 0 0 0 =- � a t � '��(�'li�'`�"' ��4�'t i� o.o o.o o.o 0 0.00 p -P.1c1`•i5--P�R-:�-1�.?+I �,bi;-Ki � '�' �' � ❑ C;C:l:.L�i:-i':iC'�*:: ��EF;'1fC:cS 0.0 D.0 � 28 � � aJ i 4 � � 0 � �� 0 p � ; � ;; 0 0 ■► � f. 0 � � 0 � C 0 � h t r� � p � t— � o 0 0 � � .► i t. � � � � # 4 � > , a � � �� .�;��. � �. �� « �.��'' � � r z � h * r► � r � � � � � R'=RTOR 15-Min Count E Shore Dr E Shore Dr Causeway Bivd Causeway Blvd Period (Northbound) (Southbound) (East6ound) (Westbound) To�� Houriy Beginning At Left Thru Ri ht U R* Left Thru Ri ht U R* Left Thru Ri ht U R* Left Thru Ri ht U R" Totals 11:OD AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 212 D 0 0 0 210 22 D 0 446 11:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 203 0 0 0 0 211 22 0 0 439 11:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 183 0 0 0 0 222 26 0 0 436 11:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 175 0 0 0 0 188 37 0 0 405 1726 12:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 206 0 0 0 0 205 23 0 0 436 1716 12:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 B 0 0 0 199 0 0 0 0 208 31 0 0 446 1723 12:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 169 D 0 0 D 223 33 0 0 432 1719 12:45 PM D D 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 D 195 0 0 0 D 210 27 0 0 438 1752 t 1 DO PMi 0 '` 0 0 . 0 `-; 0 0'', 0 -" :!:4 0�: 0 �':0 223 ': tl .-:0. 0. .: 0 19'1 fi :28. '.0 0;;; 446 ;1762,i ` 1 15 PM.; 0 '; 0 0; D >: 0 0;; D !:9 0.:: 0 0 219 '' 0 0 0 0 196; 41 t 0 0.., 467 7783.,° ;l4.7 3Q PM"� ,. 0: 'i 0 ' :0. 0 ? 0 0'- 0 . :"6 0;?: .0 ..:0. 209 ,:-. d, :0 0�. ; 0. .196<; 26. :0 .. 0..;': 437. ;1788; ".=34_'`45 P.`;�`:�$" b'�'e;�.<'�kp?`�M'?:;pF�-�;vt0^�:s�'�0^�u�0zse�b�c.-�.?;?kS'i��«0�:�,"'�°,tld�.� '.,z'Or�l6•2�fi�,. 7�U'��'�v'��'D�:?.,Y?0'6�'r,v�u.b.«-19;a ..26�r�',W�tM''0''?�,.�Otb`ii?'466.;4',hs$�$': ?� � �_ +�.�`t `6,I ,�,��-� �� Peak 15-Min Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Total Flowrates Left Thru Ri ht U R* Left Thru Ri ht U R' Left Thru Ri ht U R* LefE Thru Ri ht U R* All Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 0 0 0 984 0 0 0 0 764 104 0 0 1872 Heavy Trucks 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 40 0 0 24 8 72 Pedestrians 0 12 0 0 12 Bicycles 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Railroad Sto ed Buses Comments: Report generated on 5/25/2011 10:23 AM SOURCE:Quality Counts,LLC(http://www.qualitycounts.net) r • Type of peak hour being reported: Intersection Peak Method for determining peak hour:Total Entering Volume LdCAT1C3EV: E Shore Dr--Causeway Blvd QC JOB#: 10618701 Gf�YfST,4TE: Clearwater Beach FL DATE: 5/20/2011 az 0.75 134 Peak-Hour:4:15 PM--5:15 PM } * o.o o.o 42 o o Peak 15-Min:4:15 PM--4:30 PM � f t � o.o o.o o.o «► i 4 .�J i 4 813 f�0 f t, 134«905 2.5 «O.D � „;e,� � 0.0 fo 2.2 0.96 1140�► 0.95 « 771 0.96 u��V�i� 1.8 �► �="��f� 2.6 1140+►0 "i r 0�►1140 "`��I � * � 1.8 +�0.0 Z t 0.0�R 1.8 h. t P � a � t � ��11��i��" ��..I�'ke a �°��° o.o t � 0 0.00 o r:;ra�.�c,�,.,:,i�.tr,� ;J�-,�. c_�a:�:cr:,�=4: :�:€��F�::•_, o.o o.o � 34 � J e� � 4 1� o .� t o ��4 r `� ��j, Z � {,; 0 - 5 elr lJ�'��f� 2 � � o 'i r o �► r r� � p � �-- � o 0 0 � J �i i 4 � � � J e� i� 4 � � � 4 s �� < � �� « �► �?�:.,« a� r Z f Z � �L '� � �} t � � � � � R•=RTOR 15-Min Count E Shore Dr E Shore Dr Causeway Blvd Causeway Blvd Period (Northbound) (Southbound) (Eastbound) (Westbound) To�� Hourly Beginning At Left Thru Ri ht U R* Left Thru Ri ht U R• Left Thru Ri ht U R* Left Thru Ri ht U R* Totals 4:00 PM 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 12 0 0 0 266 0 0 0 0 182 29 0 0 489 d.� �Q �D �D ° :D � `� 0 D fl D , 0 �'9 430PM�` 0 0 0 0 0 0 D 7 �"0 D 0� 281y� 0/ a{0`�� '0 � 0 i1J6 34 : 0 D5 5�B,�. 445PM 0� 0 0 0 � D D 0 • 11' 04 0 A �290 D ;O�t 0�; 0�'20T 29 i: A 0 t537 2066 ` . S.00 P.M =,0:: D `0 0 '. 0. ,','D D. ':s 7 .•:.0 :0. ..' 0. 271 r Q ;r;0 O.S 0 (:177 ., 35,:r �. ...;D 490,.'? 2087�-" 5:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 0 0 0 275 0 0 0 0 214 27 0 0 527 2066 5:30 PM 0 D D 0 D 0 0 16 0 0 0 268 0 0 0 0 198 33 0 0 515 2063 5:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 0 0 0 226 0 D 0 0 214 27 0 0 481 2013 >f'C?.`i� �f � 'L..._!`3� �---- _,__._.� `I�`� irQ� Peak 15-Min Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Total Flowrates Left Thru Ri ht U R* Left Thru Ri ht U R* Left Thru Ri ht U R" Left Thru Ri ht U R* All Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 68 D 0 0 1192 0 0 0 0 788 144 0 0 2192 Heavy Trucks 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 0 0 20 0 36 Pedestrians 0 44 0 0 44 Bicycles 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 2 0 3 Railroad Sto ed Buses Comments: Report generated on 5/25/2011 10:23 AM SOURCE:Quality Counts,LLC(http:!/www.qualitycounts.net) � • Type of peak hour being reported:Intersection Peak Method for determining peak hour:Tofal En4ering Volume LOCATEaN: Mandalay Ave--Baymont St QC JOB#: 10618704 GfTYlSTATE: Clearwater Beach FL QATi E: 5/20/2011 414 0.90 481 Peak-Hour: 12:45 PM--1:45 PM i + 5.8 4.6 �a ss3 38 Peak 15-Min: 1:15 PM--1:30 PM � a * � 23.1 5.5 2.8 +1 � a. .Ji i 4 60 �.7 1 i 123�s 147 8.7 M 0.0 ,r �n L 2.4 1• 2.7 r�'",• 4,e._.F,.�� o.�s s .► 0.94 � s o.�s o,o .� t;��'��s� o.o s� •ra2 `i r ,s.► so ``;^`'y� h * � 3.5 �4.8 i C 5.3�► 1.7 h f r' 48 351 14 � `�-� ��.e°� �2.1 5.4 0.0� � i t � U��, <., s f 430 0.95 413 -f,fiPd,�FL.,s�-i:'IC,.! �rJ:�A �:'OLt.�:i:�i"�:�!w ��t°��1tc:._,, 5.3 4.8 � 51 � �J d i 4 � f 0 J " ` Z 94 '�`- � ._:,, 6� 2 .► �« 0 _ � .�, �► � o '� r o �► t r+ � � 80 � � D D 0 � .f i 4 L� � 1 J � i �.1� .fi ..s;; < � � f� � � r� R, � �w '; « .► M "i „�� ` ,i .. � ` *L t t' '1 4 P � � � � R•=RTOR 15-Min Count Mandalay Ave Mandalay Ave Baymont St Baymont St Period (Northbound) (Southbound) (Eastbound) (V1lestbound) To�� Hourly Beginning At Left Thru Ri ht U R* Left Thru Ri ht U R" Left Thru Ri ht U R* Lett Thru Ri ht U R` Totais 11:00 AM 9 89 6 1 1 7 77 4 0 0 2 2 6 0 12 3 0 15 1 5 240 11:15 AM 5 73 10 0 0 9 76 1 0 0 0 0 6 0 3 6 1 19 0 6 217 11:30 AM 2 89 3 1 0 6 85 3 0 0 0 0 4 0 2 3 2 22 0 0 222 11:45 AM B 79 3 0 1 7 72 2 0 0 2 0 7 0 10 4 3 23 0 1 222 901 12:00 PM 11 71 4 1 0 14 95 2 0 0 2 0 4 0 6 6 0 22 0 1 239 900 12:15 PM 8 87 1 2 0 9 75 1 0 0 3 0 8 0 2 3 2 23 0 2 226 909 12 30 PM 6 93 7 1 0 7 71 3 0 0 1 0 2 0 1 B 4 19 0 2 225 912 > 12 d5PM 9 100 3 D ; D 15 95 : 2 D 1 ;3 D . � 0 4 i r3 2 27 0 5[ 272 ; 962; 1 00 PM 10 : 78 4 2 . 0 4. 96 i 4 0� 0 3 3 , 11 `.0 3 " 4 ��1 23 ' 0 2 249 -:r 971 : ��>,`R,M iS;�Ce+'a93* .�3 a' 1� "�`0 9. �84�^�3�'S�`+i'0��'�r�0 1 '�4," 6 �1 0*�,'o�L4�'i�.2aa3�`+�108 1.30 PM , '8^ BO ,.,`d 3 ='i 0` 10 68. ':: 3. d?: 0 -+z:D 1';;'. 7. �''�'D: , '4' 4. :1 25.{<.' 0 ..';0, .238: :1031>.' 1:45 PM 4 81 8 0 0 10 104 1 0 1 3 1 3 0 B 10 3 28 0 0 265 1024 t 3 35z. ,� �F = � �� .�ti? Z ,�`� �5 �1 � `.�f 4 � � �� « Peak 15-Min Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Total Flowrates Left Thru Ri ht U R* Left Thru Ri ht U R* Left Thru Ri ht U R* Left Thru Ri ht U R* All Vehicles 60 372 12 4 0 36 336 12 0 0 4 16 24 0 16 32 4 148 0 16 1092 Heavy Trucks 0 24 0 0 20 4 0 0 0 0 0 4 52 Pedestrians 132 64 100 72 368 Bicycles 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 3 Railroad Sto ed Buses Commenfs: Report generated on 5/25/2011 10:23 AM 50URCE:Quality Counts,LLC(http://www.qualitycounts.net) • Type of peak hour being reported:Intersection Peak Method for determining peak hour:Total Entering Volume LQCATEQl�: Mandalay Ave--Baymont St QC JOB#: 10618703 GITYfSTA'FE: Clearwater Beach FL Df�TE: 5/20/2011 stz o.sz ass Peak-Hour:4:30 PM--6:30 PM 2.5 z.s �� + I Peak 15-Min:4:45 PM--5:00 PM I s f I 16 453 43' IO.� 2.6 2.3I ,+ i 4 L-- _J ,, a a �.— 66 b12 ,t L �11 k154 0.0 �8.3 �� 3.6� 3.9 .�' #"'.`r. � 0.65 3 �► 0.91 �+ 12 0.95 �>��LL�`� D.0 �► �`�`Pl;-'r F` 0.0 �`f.,.�r. 65 .►5D i r 31* 60 3� ,e p,p �} �-'� �' 6.5�► 1.7 � "1 t !� ��1 'L �' !� 43 346 14 1' � II i t � ��lc3:C9�� b�9�t�a I � z.o f � 539 0.92 403 '�;�.rd�l'��yrR'��-1�:'d �:r;". -a i_:iJ:.L4i_F'�:J�4 SE!�'Ih:..�:i 2.8 �.7 � 33 � J � i 4 � o s : � � ��a,, „ »z � � ;'� sa o .► � � o ,. � .�, � � o � � r o �t t r' � � ��2 � � 0 0 0 J L � � f t J el i� 4 L� '�� ...i . � � -1 I� � � ��i « �► `� h r 3 f Z � '! * A � 'i 1` (' � � � � •_ R RTOR 15-Min Count Mandalay Ave Mandalay Ave Baymont St Baymont St Period (Northbound) (Southbound) (Eastbound) (Westbound) Total Hourly Beginning At Left Thru Ri ht U R" LeR Thru Ri ht U R' Left Thru Ri ht U R* Left Thru Ri ht U R* Totals 4:D0 PM 11 69 4 2 0 12 99 2 0 3 4 0 11 D 4 6 1 27 0 0 255 4 15 PM 9 71 6 2 0 15 1D3 4 0 0 0 2 7 0 1 7 5 32 0 0 264 43flPM � 3 84 3 D 0 .�90 � 1D5 8 D-. 0 4 1 6 b 0 '��4 t 5 28 'D� 1= 26'I �, ` r+'�98'.�°M�`63 3 �.°3x 0 �� 1` � 9 � . 0 1 3� ' 9 . 5 DO pM 1U : 79 `3 1 . 0 8 129 2 A, d� `3'� "I 4x 0 � 3', 6 3 30 = 0 3- 285 '1121 '. 5.15�AM, . S-. 1D0 .. ,-`5 • 1 ; 0. ,•.13 105...`•.q 0:�: . 0. ,`_2�. `0.'.', .9� , '`0., . 3.-: .10 :�,� i • 19 ' 0 .. 0' 277. ;:1,134�' 5:30 PM 10 77 6 2 1 10 93 2 0 0 1 8 12 0 5 7 2 21 0 0 257 1130 5:45 PM 10 87 2 0 0 4 95 2 0 0 0 2 6 0 2 7 1 18 0 1 237 1056 5�= O,�t`t �,� �� L� �! � �z �=� �--ia6 � `�"' �--- 1 Z �� `°`� ��°' ��3 � � � �12" I T >.�G� Peak 15-Min Northbound Southbound Easthound Westbound Total FlowraEes Left Thru Ri ht U R* Left Thru Ri ht U R* Left Thru Ri ht U R' Left Thru Ri ht U R* All Vehicles 72 332 �2 12 0 48 456 4 0 4 24 4 48 0 52 44 12 116 0 4 1244 Heavy Trucks 0 20 0 0 16 0 D 0 0 8 0 4 48 Pedestrians 84 52 136 56 328 Bicycles 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Railroad Sto ed Buses Comments: Report generated on 5/25/2011 10:23 AM SOURCE:Quality Counts,LLC(http://www.qualitycounfs.net) • Type of peak hour being reported:Intersection Peak Method for determining peak hour:Total Entering Volume LC3CAFEQP�: Coronado Dr--S Gulfview Blvd QC JOB#: 10618706 GITYFSTA'FE: Clearwater Beach FL E�ATE: 5/20/2011 663 0.93 703 Peak-Hour: 12:15 PM--1:15 PM s.a a.s � i + � Peak 15-Min: 12:15 PM--12:30 PM I Y f � 36D 303 0 I 2.5 4.6 0.0 ,x i +. —1 .� s a 360 �z5a J i o�. o 2.5 M 5.9 ,t ,�i� 't. 0.0« 0.0 ri��.� 0.92 0 +► 0.97 � 0 0.00 ''*`"" D.D �► -�,�y�F 0.0 281�i 27 Z �' 0�► 0 6.0 ■►7.4 'Z `f"'� t 0.0�► 0.0 � h t P �I h t r' t�� ; aas * � �4��B'��' ��i�9�'i e� IIo.o a.2 0.0II o.s3 'rsi�r°-a=FC;��t-4-'Ica=; ,.hy4 I i � I 331❑450 ` i:C�!.L_.i_'i i�:��: �EC;�dIC':�_.': 4.B 4.2 � D � J .+ i 4 � _ n o 1 �` D 4 �' �,,.r.; p 0 .► �` f. 0 _ � JJ11 � ° '� � �r o � 45 � � D 1 0 � J .s t 4 l� � � .� i �.l� � � ., � � T T � y � < ,:s,�. , � i+�;, � � � � i 4�n ` i �e r � '1 t t' � h t �' � � � � � R'=RTOR 15-Min Count Coronado Dr Coronado Dr S Gulfview Blvd S Gulfview Blvd Period (Northbound) (Southbound) (Eastbound) (Westbound) Total Hourly Beginning At Left Thru Ri ht U R* Left Thru Ri ht U R* Left Thru Ri ht U R" Left Thru Ri ht U R• Totals 11:D0 AM 0 119 0 0 0 0 BS 77 0 0 72 0 3 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 358 11:15 AM 0 112 0 0 0 0 74 98 0 0 53 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 339 11:30 AM 0 101 0 D 0 0 BB 67 0 0 62 0 4 0 0 D 0 0 0 0 342 11:45 AM 0 94 0 0 0 0 58 92 0 0 49 0 4 0 1 0 D 0 0 0 298 1337 12.00 PM 0 110 0 0 0 0 78 68 0 0 48 0 4 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 3D8 1287 i � 2b� 46�O �'�`1: 0 0 82,'� 9� U �' p g Cf q "� s � 359 �90 ;12 30 PM' 0 - 99 '0 0 0 0,' 64 `99 0� 0 �6'1�'} '0 3 0 s, 0 ' 07 0 0 0 0; 325 1294 12 45 PM 0 ''113 0 0 . 0 0� 79 i63 0 0 65 t 07 " 9 � 2� 0 0. 0 ': 0 0; 351� ,1344, , . ,. ,.. ` ii+: 1i00 RM; 0 ":117 :0 0 0 �:0 78. :r`Sa 0:: 0 . .7B • 0.;- 6 .'k`�0 � b .:_. 0 �:;0 0 _:'.0 0'_ . 359 ,:>;1394°:` 1:15 PM 0 '106 0 0 0 0 75 84 D 0 72 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 340 1375 1:3D PM D 107 0 0 0 0 77 76 0 0 65 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 D 326 1375 1:45 PM 0 117 0 0 0 0 71 83 0 0 74 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 351 1375 Ct��!� � �� ^e�� ."��,�2�t .y �� `� `,f.`.Ca...._..,�✓ � ! � �3a Peak 15-Min Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Total Flowrates Left Thru Ri ht U R* Left Thru Ri ht U R* Left Thru Ri ht U R* Left Thru Ri ht U R* All Vehicles 0 480 0 4 0 0 328 368 0 D 208 0 24 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 1436 Heavy Trucks 0 12 0 0 16 B 8 0 4 0 0 0 48 Pedestrians 60 0 4 0 64 Bicycles 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Railroad Sto ed Buses Comments: Report generated on 5/25/2011 10:23 AM SOURCE:Quality Counts,LLC(http:/lwww.qualitycounts.net) • Type of peak hour being reported:Intersection Peak Method for determining peak hour:Total Entering Volume LOCATEOi�: Coronado Dr--S Gulfview Bivd QC JC3B#: 10618705 Cf�YfSTATE: Clearwater Beach FL QA1"E: 5/20/2011 652 0.93 857 Peak-Hour:4:00 PM--5:00 PM z.a �.e � + t I Peak 15-Min:4:00 PM--4:15 PM � a t � 285 367 0 I 3.2 2.5 0.0 .J i 4 �- .� i 4 285 (.294� L 0� 0 3.2 f�2.4 ? „:;� !. 0.0 f• 0.0 o,e5 0 .1 0.93 � 0 0.00 ~ � 0 0 �► ��;��M 0.0 3D4.►'10 'i � 0�i 0 �'�"�°t�� h * * 2.6 �10.0'3 " C o.0�R o.o h * (� 0 563 0 � i t � ��c�.�� 0.0 1.4 0.0 '�::R�c.,r•��R-��IC"1 :r.':,--o: � i * � 377 0.93 563 �� 3 . '. . i:;�i..!_�C:'it�:�?: _EI7dIC.:--% 2.7 1.4 � o � J .1 i 4 L� r 1 1 ,�� 0 • g ��t �y ys p 0 •► �'`, f� 0 - � JJ11 � � � r � h t r* � Zg � � 0 9 0 � .�I ..� i 4 L� � r J J i 4 � > i � I j � � me* L � , � '� �" �" '� ,► w ~ t„-,k� Z � Z � "t ' t' "1 t f' � � � � .- R -RTOR 15-Min Count Coronado Dr Coronado Dr S Gulfview Bivd S Gulfview Bivd Period (Northbound) (Southbound) (Eastbound) (Vllestbound) Total Hourly Beginning At Left Thru Ri ht U R* Left Thru Ri ht U R" Left Thru RI ht U R* Left Thru Ri ht U R' Totals 0 � 5 `�U 0� Q 96 � A 8 a � � 415,j�M 0 ��52 0 0 D r 0 90* :71 0 ' 0t 78{� 0 v,�3�' ;0 �<; �'0�+ °Of 0 0 U x395 : i � 4 30 pNl 0 13y ';0 0 : A 0 84 i 62 0; 0 �65 } �'0°.`Y 2 0 0 0 `'Ofr x 0 • 0 0 k 350 � � �•, ` " , - ; . ,1:' 0 . ;:0 , 0 . 0 ,. 0 36y 1519;. : 4.45'-PM 0 ' 123 .. 0 .0... 0. . 0 95 ;75. :.0: ., ,0 s71 , 0; , 2. ::0. 5:00 PM 0 145 0 0 0 0 92 77 0 0 76 0 2 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 392 1504 5:15 PM 0 121 0 Q 0 0 80 85 1 0 93 0 0 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 380 1489 5:30 PM 0 134 0 0 0 0 81 62 0 0 72 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 349 1488 5;45 PM 0 125 0 0 0 0 92 63 0 0 58 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 342 1463 �,c � �� c� �c,� .„ � � 2�?� _ � (D � � I ! a �� Peak 15-Min Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Total Flowrates Left Thru Ri ht U R" Left Thru Ri ht U R* Left Thru Ri ht U R* Left Thru Ri ht U R* All Vehicles 0 604 0 0 0 D 392 308 0 0 320 0 4. 0 0 0 0 0 0 D 1626 Heavy Trucks 0 4 0 0 8 12 8 0 0 0 0 0 32 Pedestrians 8 D 4 0 12 Bicycles 0 3 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 Railroad Sto ed Buses Comments: Report generated on 5/25l2011 10:23 AM SOURCE:Quality Counts,LLC(http://www.qualitycounts.net) PEAK HOUR/P.H.F.DATA PROJECT: Ff2f1ChYS PROJECT NO: 12-020 � , LOCATION: East Shore Dr(NS) & Papaya St(E-W) DATE: April 13,2012 LANE TYPE: SPEED LIMIT: SIGNAL TIMING: A G Y R (SECONDS) (Not Applicable) NB 2 Lane NB N/A NB SB 2 Lane SB N/A SB EB 21ane EB N/A EB WB 21ane WB N/A WB MID-DAY PEAK HOUR COUNTS _ TIME NB NB NB SB SB SB EB EB EB WB WB WB TOTAL HOURLY AM/PM L T R L T R L T R L T R VOLUME VOLUMES 11:00-11:15 ' 9 51 11:15-1130 53 11:30-11:45- 43 11:45-12:00: `. S 57 204 12:00-12:15 55 208 12:15-12:30 'S 53 208 12:30-12:45 { 57 222 12:45-1:00 54 279 1:00-1:15 48 420 1:15-1:30 < 49 416 1:30-1:45 - 49 422 HOURLY FLOW DIAGRAM 1:45-2 00 €.�,;�Acs�,' -_�- 43 189 78 739 89 381 15 3 41 18 8 6 45 3 0 3 612 ,� f I PEAK HOUR TIME NB NB NB SB SB SB EB EB EB WB WB WB TOTAL 8 9 1 AM/PM L T R L T R L T R L T R VOLUME � t I L� 0 � �8 tl � 57 42 f— 2 � '� 2 �—4 0 "� 55 6 —► �-- 0 0 s 53 25—► 17 —� � 2 —► 73 0 � � -; : � � � � 57 � � � 34 135 6 1 9 8 2 6 17 2 0 2 222 34 135 6 i t INTERSECTION PEAK HOUR 11:45-12:45 INTERSECTION PHF 0.97 28 775 f INTERSECTION PEAK HOUR VOLUME 222 !� F �� PEAK HOUR VOLUME NB 175 PHF NB 0.93 J/��F. � �:3� � PEAK HOUR VOLUME SB 18 PHF SB 0.64 � PEAK HOUR VOLUME EB 25 PHF EB 0.63 � �� '� PEAK HOUR VOLUME WB 4 PHF WB 0.33 �n f � V� `�" 1 � �-1 �- ?� '� 2 �-- � zs --� I�J� �ti� �"� i3 `�F--� � J '�-a� .,G`� ��ti J�� T,�,2 _ . PEAK HOUR/P.H.F.DATA PROJECT: FRENCHYS PROJECT NO: 12-020 , LOCATION: East Shore Dr(N-S) � Papaya St(E-W) DATE: April 13,2012 LANE TYPE: SPEED LIMIT: SIGNAL TIMING: A G Y R (SECONDS) (not applicable) NB 2 Lane NB N/A NB SB 2 Lane SB N/A SB EB 2 Lane EB N/A EB WB 2 Lane WB N/A WB PM PEAK HOUR COUNTS TIME NB NB NB SB SB SB EB EB EB WB WB WB TOTAL HOURLY PM L T R L T R L T R L T R VOLUME VOLUMES 4:00-4:15 �J':'r- 4 43 ��: 4:15-430 �, 10�'F � Q' 52 4:30-4:45 0 63 4:45-5:00 50 208 5:00-5:15 1� 52 217 5:15-5:30 53 278 5:30-5.45 1 5- 64 219 HOURLY FLOW DIAGRAM 5:45-6:00 ��;J1�� 4� Q � 63 232 26 147 76 274 7 0 43 5 8 1 21 2 0 3 440 1 �} i PEAK HOUR TIME NB NB NB SB SB SB EB EB EB WB WB WB TOTAL 2 24 0 PM L T R L T R L T R L T R VOLUME � I � ♦ f �.. 5:00-515 ��^1�� 7 0 `` ` `_' - 52 42 �— 6 � � 0 �� 5:15-5.30 . 5 -. 3 53 1 530-5:45 ; .'I , � , . 64 24—► 17 � � U —+ 2 5:45-6:00 �� . �� ..� �'. � . Q� - N 63 � � � 40 141 1 0 24 2 6 1 17 0 0 0 232 40 741 7 i t INTERSECTION PEAK HOUR 5:00-6:00 INTERSECTION PHF 0.91 J 47 782 � INTERSECTION PEAK HOUR VOLUME 232 ^ 2� ��` PEAK HOUR VOLUME NB 182 PHF NB 0.86 �/�G�- � �q� J PEAK HOUR VOLUME SB 26 PHF SB 0.81 � ' � �� Z� �� PEAK HOUR VOLUME EB 24 PHF EB 0.67 � PEAK HOUR VOLUME WB 0 PHF WB #DIV/0! I I !�J �Y � �� --°-. �� l'"___.__�� __�-� � I✓---� � o� �.� 2 ti� ��.-�..� i��'---�� .,�`�. � � � � �� ►�� f �� `,�� PEAK HOUR I P.H.F.DATA PROJECT: Frenchys PROJECT NO: 12-020 . , LOCATION: Poinsettia St(N-S) & Papaya Ave(E-W) DATE: April 13,2012 LANE TYPE: SPEED LIMIT: SIGNAL TIMING: A G Y R (SECONDS) (Not Applicable) NB 2 Lane NB N/A NB SB 2 Lane SB N/A SB EB 21ane EB N/A EB WB 21ane WB N/A WB MID-DAY PEAK HOUR COUNTS TIME NB NB NB SB SB SB EB EB EB WB WB WB TOTAL HOURLY AM/PM L T R L T R L T R L T R VOLUME VOLUMES 11:00-11:15� 50 11:15-1130 .. ; d 55 11:30-11:45 44 11:45-12:00 . 5 54 203 12:00-12:15 . 63 276 12:15-12:30` . 66 227 12:30-12:45 70 253 12:45-1:00 54 253 1:00-1:15 66 472 1:15-1:30 65 482 1:30-1:45 58 496 HOURLY FLOW DIAGRAM 1:45-2:00 2 2°°," ':� 65 254 � 90 96 30 198 44 6 196 28 35 14 44 29 36 50 710 1 1 i PEAK HOUR TIME NB NB NB SB SB SB EB EB EB WB WB WB TOTAL 71 77 2 AM/PM L T R L T R L T R L T R VOLUME I I I �I L� 12:00-12:1: � ` _ w0' 63 27 � 70 —� � 22 �45 12:15-12:30 66 9 —► f— 11 12:30-12:45 _ 70 26—► 7 —� �— 12 —► 34 12:45-1:00 z . -_ 54 � 1 � � 5 64 23 2 77 11 10 9 7 12 11 22 253 5 64 23 1 1 INTERSECTION PEAK HOUR 12:00-1:00 INTERSECTION PHF 0.90 ,d' 96 92 �' INTERSECTION PEAK HOUR VOLUME 253 �'� �� PEAK HOUR VOLUME NB 92 PHF NB 0.82 � f! PEAK HOUR VOLUME SB 90 PHF SB 0.90 �'�C�-G �j ir' '�' J ?� „ f PEAK HOUR VOLUME EB 26 PHF EB 072 �� , �J` PEAK HOUR VOLUME WB 45 PHF WB 0.80 E�°� J `Z� �-- ��---� '�=�--_-. �� .�"..�--_ �-�- ✓ J �.c�..� �✓_�> � �� ,.�„_.---� 3� � �, ti� �—� �' ��o��J � �� '�.��• � q n� PEAK HOUR/P.H.F.DATA PROJECT: FRENCHYS PROJECT NO: 12-020 LOCATION: Poinsettia Ave(N-S) � Papaya St(E-W) DATE: April 13,2012 LANE TYPE: SPEED LIMIT: SIGNAL TIMING: A G Y R (SECONDS) (not applicableJ NB 2 Lane NB N/A NB SB 2 Lane SB N/A SB EB 2 Lane EB N/A EB WB 2 Lane WB N/A WB PM PEAK HOUR COUNTS TIME NB NB NB SB SB SB EB EB EB WB WB WB TOTAL HOURLY PM L T R L T R L T R L T R VOLUME VOLUMES 4:00-4:15 r�:� '5- 0 " 0 52 4:15-4:30 ��l�n 66 -; 4:30-4 45 �� 72 � 4:45-5:00 ,.:S 3 _ 70 260 5:00-5:15 ' Q� 56 264 5:15-5 30 52 250 5:30-5 45 � "`_ 7 9 69 247 HOURLY FLOW DIAGRAM 5:45-6 00 �� F6: 2 3 84 261 97 177 26 143 23 6 169 12 30 10 16 19 22 45 521 1 � PEAK HOUR TIME NB NB NB SB SB SB EB EB EB WB WB WB TOTAL 8 87 2 PM L T R L T R L T R L T R VOLUME I I I �l i L� 4:15-4 30 �0 A;, 2' '� (1�� ; 66 27 �— 12 � L 24 �44 , 430-4:45 5- 3.-� 72 5 —► � 17 4:45-5:00 �� 5�. 0 4 , 70 25—► 8 � � 9 —► 16 5:00-5:15 ` 56 � f � � 8 81 9 2 87 8 12 5 8 9 11 24 264 8 87 9 INTERSECTION PEAK HOUR 4:15-5:15 INTERSECTION PHF 0.92 J 70� � � INTERSECTION PEAK HOUR VOLUME 264 C{�' (��7 PEAK HOUR VOLUME NB 98 PHF NB 0.74 PEAK HOUR VOLUME SB 97 PHF SB 0.76 p� e 'J PEAK HOUR VOLUME EB 25 PHF EB 0.63 PSC�f (/. `� `t'' J� �$� 'L," PEAK HOUR VOLUME WB 44 PHF WB 0.73 � � ! �j J Z� � J�i� �Z4 ,� �3 �---.-�l 25 .,..� � � y �J ---� l� � I � l, � �a q �� T� Two-Way Stop Control Page 1 of 1 , ' TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY �°a.. ,�. u.,,�� -" � ' �? a :'��'�7 '��' " �Y. �,� �,, �„,�""�' �"ik'Sa� � Y ° +� rr�+,'^� �, ,�,�- Gene�al;lnformationt ��,�� ;�� .�S.i�e�ln�orm'at�on�, �� '� �f �� . „ �_ . ,... Analyst RP Intersection CAUSEWAY/EAST SHORE Agency/Co. GCC Jurisdiction CLEARWATER Date Performed 4/9/2012 Analysis Year 2012 EXISTING Analysis Time Period MIDDAY PEAK Pro�ect Descri tion East/West Street: CAUSEWAY BLVD North/South Street: EAST SHORE RT ONLY Intersection Orientation: East West Stud Period hrs : 0.25 �" ��°'��'"�`�-,,. � , Ueh`�c1e�Yo�um.es�and�Ad ustments � �MF��,.��. � , ,�a E� �.�.� _�: Ma'or Street Eastbound Westbound � Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume veh/h 870 753 117 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.97 0.97 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 896 0 0 776 120 veh/h Percent Heav Vehicles 0 -- -- 0 -- -- Median Type Raised curb RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 2 0 0 2 0 Confi uration T T TR U stream Si nal 0 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume veh/h 23 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 0 0 0 0 23 veh/h Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 2 Percent Grade (%) 0 � Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 1 Configuration R Dela�f,4u'eue Len th� aiid Level�'of:Service.''.;��a , ,;� �,. .�;�','�,..5-��_� ; a �,��; ,9?��;��''"� � ��y`�`��;'��r;, ��u,�.,: Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration R v (veh/h) 23 C (m) (veh/h) 609 v/c 0.04 95% queue length 0.12 Control Delay (s/veh) 11.1 LOS B Approach Delay (s/veh) -- -- 11.1 Approach LOS I -- I -- � B Copyright O 2010 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.6 Generated: 4/9/2012 1:16 PM file://C:\Documents and Settings�rpergolizzi.GULFCOAST\Local Settings\Temp\u2k9D.tmp 4/9/2012 Two-Way Stop Control Page 1 of 1 . ' TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY ��'a:k'�-x!("'i�;%., S .� �?��s,P-�,. �t.rr,,! ^s�tE a�,�"�, ws'e�a�5;r-=a :zr. -v`-�z „�%�,. - a� . _� ., 5"' � ";'t P€ �ur �"rc fi e�,"r;� General�lnformation��.�x;��,,s�;.:,�� f,��3��F��.,��Site�lnfor_ ;atio,.� ga��,: �= �� j� r ��: s�s. _.�',�'�d t s,i-k,� '� '�z..,-o.�`a3s��`'a 6��.�, ,"�;'�",;�,r,�'��.. Analyst RP intersection CAUSEWAY/EAST Agency/Co. GCC SHORE Date Performed 4/9/2012 Jurisdiction CLEARWATER Analysis Time Period PM PEAK Analysis Year 2012 EXISTING Pro'ect Descri tion East/West Street: CAUSEWAY BLVD North/South Street: EAST SHORE RT ONLY Intersection Orientation: East-West Stud Period hrs : 0.25 Ue cle��g€,folumes�ana Ad'us me��s� ��`A9`�I ��- � `� �� ' �� F.»�+s.,�.2m..,-,.,-4'?. . �«a.. t ,..e ��. . .,., . :v. i�I,�`�f�4 h ic e n 1...F..,. s�-,f'�7-:'a« e? .vJG.y�,, f�,w�3-- Ma'or Street Eastbound � Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume veh/h 1106 748 130 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 1164 0 0 787 136 veh/h Percent Heav Vehicles 0 -- -- 0 -- -- Median T pe Raised curb RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 2 0 0 2 0 Confi uration T T TR U stream Si nal 0 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume veh/h 41 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 0 0 0 0 42 veh/h Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 2 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 1 Configuration R �;� „ ., . . ��,�,.�.� �.� .r „�. ( 31:� �i `�„„v',�°fi".,'�9 u i�'�.'�" "�e, . „�^ r�- m 'r.'. �- Dela Queue Len th andzLevel of,Serv�ce.:, � { � � � °�''�,� �' ��G' � �� $ ;� � � tr w�`� _, � r $ ,-'6 r r .h�..�-, �'� I rI h �+✓S ,:s...z+��„, ..°'f�.�t�'L�� Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration R v(veh/h) 42 C (m) (veh/h) 5gg v/c I 0.07 95% queue length 0.23 Control Delay (s/veh) 11.5 LOS g Approach Delay (s/veh) -- -- 11.5 Approach LOS -- � -- I I g Copyright O 2010 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.6 Generated: 4/9/2012 1:22 PM file://C:\Documents and Settings�rpergolizzi.GULFCOAST\Local Settings\Temp\u2kA2.tmp 4/9/2012 Detailed Report Page 1 of 1 • HCS+�" DETAILED REPORT � ".z_^`4��t �a""ffi'�A'd, �'a -. ` ' ' . .e`:�e .� �- w�c�R `�`^"3tl.�'i'3.x�1'°"�"r�-dn- 's"" � .3 �r't^ Q t. ,Genera/lnforma#�on r`��.��a.��>�� ;,�� , �`��; :�.�r'��r�� i�e�'/nforma#ion�'�� '�.s � s� °�� u �: � � �. g 4 < `�. -t� r,-,.,.�" �;' �t .� �,,.?_ . _ ._. � - n �.i+ '° 7 a� 3 �� +� �� <a v��Y,t��?�.'� .t��a MR`s.�.�...�s��.r;e-:- Analyst RP Intersection MANDALAY/BAYMONT Agency or Co. GCC Area Type AI!other areas Date Performed 4/9/2012 Jurisdiction CLEARWATER Time Period M/DDAYPEAK Analysis Year 2012 EXISTING Project ID a�eawe.,�p'au� ra.x°:v,�e s`��%^srs«P'¢ -4�" J � �`4 's0k �„h ,�� ,�° � �,r � � s� �"s (�'sa � Volume anai�Timin �°ln u��*��.. r,.�:�w;�� N��`� .� �� °�;�� .,s� .� � nv�. �:. ��:w�'�,��;6��, ,� � �EB �� WB NB � SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Number of Lanes, N� 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 2 0 Lane Group LTR LTR LTR LTR Volume,V(vph) 7 8 41 19 5 119 47 340 14 37 352 13 % Heavy Vehicles, %HV 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.94 0.93 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Pretimed (P) or Actuated (A) A A A A A A A A A A A A Start-up Lost Time, I� 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Extension of Effective Green, e 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival Type,AT 3 3 3 3 Unit Extension, UE 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Filterin /Metering, I 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Initial Unmet Demand, Qb 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Ped/Bike/RTOR Volumes 94 0 15 61 0 11 80 0 0 51 0 � Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 � � Parking/Grade/Parking N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N Parking Maneuvers, Nm Buses Stopping, Ns 0 0 0 0 Min. Time for Pedestrians, Gp 3.6 3.5 3.6 3.4 Phasing EW Perm 02 03 04 NS Perm 06 07 08 Timing G= 14.0 G = G= G= G = 38.0 G = G= G= Y= 4 Y= Y= Y= Y= 4 Y= Y= Y= Duration of Analysis, T= 0.25 Cycle Length, C= 60.0 "'�riMF";�" T,•._>' sv�^-""�'F::�»� aw,..,� .,.-uSaS'."4� �., 'b...! n p sv»=�.a. ��,�` �i �.R Lane_Grou ;Ca ac� ;Control De/a �ancl LOS'Veterm�nat�oii:��''�,��,:,;��`��""��;hu},��'�;�� ,„,��= � �: ��,,�. ,.-.�� EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Adjusted Flow Rate, v 44 140 427 427 Lane Group Capacity, c I 381 372 1959 2007 v/c Ratio,X 0.12 0.38 0.22 0.21 Total Green Ratio, g/C 0.23 0.23 0.63 0.63 Uniform Delay, d� 18.1 19.3 4.7 4.7 Progression Factor, PF 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Delay Calibration, k 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 Incremental Delay, d2 0.1 0.6 0.1 0.1 Initial Queue Delay, d3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Control Delay 18.3 20.0 4.7 4.7 Lane Group LOS 8 8 A A Approach Delay 18.3 20.0 4.7 4.7 Approach LOS 8 8 A A Intersection Delay 7.4 X� =0.26 Intersection LOS A Copyright O 2007 University of Florida,Ail Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.3 Generated: 4!9/2012 1:27 PM file://C:\Documents and Settings�rpergolizzi.GULFCOAST\Local Settings\Temp\s2kB4.tmp 4/9/2012 Detailed Report Page 1 of 1 , " HCS+'" DETAILED REPORT �Geiierallnt'o�mation° �*�;�'��_�,.�x��s#�'��t�'^�,�5"i`r}��tiv,;;�� r s��n�,,��..s� ��` i��' ��, ��,�r r �� :��.� �. r � ., �' �,r =�Stte.ln�ormation�� .�� ,��f �..,a._._��7 ��.,�� Analyst RP Intersection MANDALAY/BAYMONT Agency or Co. GCC Area Type All other areas Date Performed 4/9/12 Jurisdiction CLEARWATER Time Period PM PEAK Analysis Year 2012 EXISTING Project ID ,.-a aa;^,�asu�':,� s,.-�-: :��°sc:�-*a'=° �� ^�'sY r .� , .,._ ... aVo/ume and,�=Timrn <n U��€.�� ,�at �,FPr�c':�`�_ �.,�2,.�< �";��`�+��:�et-�°�°: s.'�«'��"�5"E�,��'r��_ .� �� a�� .. . , . • . � �.��, m.� 5 `"Snw -� '4Sn S 4t � B . SA�. G n,+��. EB .� WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Number of Lanes, N� 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 2 0 Lane Group LTR LTR LTR LTR Volume,V(vph) 12 3 49 30 12 108 42 336 14 42 439 16 % Heavy Vehicles, %HV 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 Pretimed (P)or Actuated (A) A A A A A A A A A A A A Start-up Lost Time, I� 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Extension of Effective Green, e 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival Type,AT 3 3 3 3 Unit Extension, UE 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Filtering/Metering, I 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Initial Unmet Demand, Qb 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Ped/Bike/RTOR Volumes 172 0 15 54 0 11 112 0 0 33 0 0 Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Parking/Grade/Parking N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N N D N Parking Maneuvers, Nm Buses Stopping, Ne 0 0 0 0 Min. Time for Pedestrians, GP 4.0 3.4 3.7 3.3 Phasing EW Perm 02 03 04 NS Perm 06 07 08 Timing G = 14.0 G = G= G = G= 38.0 G = G= G= Y= 4 Y= Y= Y= Y= 4 Y= Y= Y= Duration of Analysis, T= 0.25 Cycle Length, C= 60.0 `a.ns`�...�� ^�. r�.s-..: 7a7��: ra ,tt.« u K � .- �,naen„a �.�-y� TMN"e'� „" y. -t �, � "`r.�t'�kx y„: al^zt;az n� r �LaneGrou .Ca acr ,.;Controldela andltOSTDeter"minat►on��.,��,k�r�� S�w�� :.r�� ""��;��"�,��r�,'�` k. '��,.�,s�� „�;��,;�� `: � ��ry�;��M. EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Adjusted Flow Rate,v 53 153 430 546 Lane Group Capacity, c 364 368 � 1946 2004 v/c Ratio,X 0.15 0.42 0.22 0.27 Total Green Ratio, g/C I0.23 0.23 0.63 0.63 Uniform Delay, d� 18.3 19.5 4.7 4.9 Progression Factor, PF 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Delay Calibration, k 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 Incremental Delay, d2 0.2 0.8 0.1 0.1 Initial Queue Delay, d3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Control Delay 18.4 20.3 � I 4.7 I I 4.9 Lane Group LOS 8 C ,q I I I A I Approach Delay 18.4 20.3 4.7 4.9 Approach LOS 8 C I A A Intersection Delay 7.5 X� =0.31 Intersection LOS A Copyright OO 2007 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.3 Generated: 4/912012 1:31 PM file://C:\Documents and Settings�rpergolizzi.GULFCOAST\Local Settings\Temp\s2kC8.tmp 4/9/2012 Detailed Report Page 1 of 1 , ' HCS+'" DETAILED REPORT q ^sai�.,. .,� v ; a.,.. ,<�.� ' `'� s �. �r Lx w,r�,:�6 ��°Y�` � �, > ,General lnformation�'_�¢ �� r�"��`�, '�� ,' �,��3��`��,��'Site7/n"�ormatton� � �� ``��` � r�� * '`a=�� :�` '` �.�. ��, s� �,.r �,. v,r�, s �'t Z x�'.,"�".�a� ��`-rr,'_ , ,,,:m.»,� s�.x�x,t''.��fe;.7��'a?�-.�`.';�`.:r'�.`��>;,'. Analyst RP Intersection CORONADO/GULFVIEW Agency or Co. GCC Area Type All other areas Date Performed 4/9/12 Jurisdiction CLEARWATER Time Period MIDDAYPEAK Analysis Year 2012 EX/STING Project ID ""&�'*dTCka.�'�'��ye..y,. .MKffi.EY�r'� Jk"A'".�'�ra fx`. .. � . �Y's"3 i" .,. 3: Ya 5 y�, t*.W..'9� S ��Vol�meand�Timm M uC �� '�� , � � �,= � ��`�. ;�� .��-� �. . 6....3Pa 9 ur�"r'��"lv.y a C �,.-.:..- .� .u�.��a�-n.N��: ��n w.,�,. �'s��,w`�.g.'. ._.,m ,dx�:r,a�b S '�,,.�E;"°�r � _ :�, �rc .:.;"t.n�� '�,"` EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Number of Lanes, N� 2 0 0 2 2 2 Lane Group L LR LT T R Volume,V v h) 246 26 1 436 294 349 % Heavy Vehicles, %HV 2 2 2 2 2 2 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 Pretimed (P) or Actuated (A) A A A A A A Start-up Lost Time, I� 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Extension of Effective Green, e 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival Type,AT 3 3 3 3 3 Unit Extension, UE 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Filterin /Meterin , I 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Initial Unmet Demand, Qb 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Ped/Bike/RTOR Volumes 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 45 0 0 Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 �12.0 � Parking/Grade/Parking N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N Parking Maneuvers, Nm Buses Stopping, NB 0 0 0 0 0 Min. Time for Pedestrians, Gp 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.4 Phasing EB Only 02 03 04 NS Perm 06 07 08 Timing G = 22.0 G= G = G= G= 30.0 G = G= G = Y= 4 Y= Y= Y= Y= 4 Y= Y= Y= Duration of Analysis, T= 0.25 Cycle Length, C= 60.0 C+w�' "'F"f2P•':;�..: "F'F.awG:'.':' � 'zsr�t5rY3F P' 4.�"2..�TM'�- _ ..,. E..xpSA�� 4� 1 �'F" 14.�. ..!T P "�" 4 � 5 Lane::Grou .;_Ca aci ,>Contro/De�a =ani�LOS:Dete�minat�on,,m,aw��,��t.. �.. ��,`��.�� , ��;,"�„��.�z=��,�,.,�ra''�� h:.��-' EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Adjusted Flow Rate,v 254 27 450 303 360 Lane Group Capacity, c 1260 580 ��_J 9693 _J 1774 1402 v/c Ratio,X 0.20 0.05 0.27 0.17 0.26 Total Green Ratio, g/C 0.37 0.37 0.50 0.50 0.50 Uniform Delay, d� 13.0 12.2 8.6 8.2 8.6 Progression Factor, PF 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Delay Calibration, k 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.91 Incremental Delay, d2 0.1 0.0 0.9 0.0 0.1 Initial Queue Delay, d3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Control Delay 13.1 12.3 � g,7 8,2 g,7 Lane Group LOS g g A A A Approach Delay I 13.0 I 8.7 8.5 Approach LOS 8 A A Intersection Delay 9,5 X� = 0.24 Intersection LOS A Copyright OO 2007 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved HCS+rM Version 5.3 Generated: 4/9/2012 1:33 PM file://C:\Documents and Settings�rpergolizzi.GULFCOAST\Local Settings\Temp\s2kEA.tmp 4/9/2012 Detailed Report Page 1 of 1 , ' HCS+'" DETAILED REPORT i Genera//nfoirriation F;��';��r��`''��'�_� .,� �,�1;, �, =� ��, -�� - � ��-�� "9 � �, N .. �. � P _ .� � �� , ��rfe�nformatrA�� ,� � �� ' . < �� y� , ,� �, .�� .� �� :� � n „ , .. �� , � Analyst RP Intersection CORONADO/GULFVIEW Agency or Co. GCC Area Type A/l other areas Date PerFormed 4/9/12 Jurisdiction CLEARWATER Time Period PM PEAK Analysis Year 2012 EXIST/NG ,��a�� ,�� - , Project ID �,VOIUl11e 811t�ST!/11/O �.lf�U�� , ��.�� . o .� �:_ s ,�:�a. , ...:.... � . ��,�,��K�r'��.�'��,��: �'�� , . � � ��»�.� -� �,��' EB ' WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Number of Lanes, N� 2 0 0 2 2 2 Lane Group L LR LT T R Volume,V(v h 285 10 0 563 356 276 % Heavy Vehicles, %HV 2 2 2 2 2 2 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 Pretimed (P)or Actuated (A) A A A A A A Start-up Lost Time, I� 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Extension of Effective Green, e 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival Type,AT 3 3 3 3 3 Unit Extension, UE 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Filtering/Meterin , I 1.000 1.000 9.000 1.000 1.000 Initial Unmet Demand, Qa 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 � 0.0 � Ped/Bike/RTOR Volumes 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 45 0 � 0 � Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Parking/Grade/Parking N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N Parking Maneuvers, Nm Buses Stopping, Ns 0 0 0 0 0 Min. Time for Pedestrians, Gp 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.4 Phasing EB Only 02 03 04 NS Perm 06 07 08 Timing G= 22.0 G= G = G= G= 30.0 G = G= G = Y= 4 Y= Y= Y= Y= 4 Y= Y= Y= Duration of Analysis, T= 0.25 Cycle Length, C= 60.0 raas�,. .n a ar ..s�`n7',.-�':° � .,xic�r.�. v,a .,.�.asa�� # ,`�..r .a r> ;;x ,.,°.ro�-�.s t 3''�+; x d"�,rd'�" � " ''�'� `r"3"'��&��i'� r�' .r��'�x�.�it�k 3�- I � -.�-. Lane`Grou .;�'a acc ,�ConfrolDela � ana1LOS>peterminat�on��.h�� .� ��'�'��" ��-��s�� ,��`�,�,��;,��t.�°�. -' EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Adjusted Flow Rate,v 306 11 605 383 297 Lane Group Capacity, c 1260 580 1774 � 1774 1402 v/c Ratio,X 0.24 0.02 0.34 0.22 0.21 Total Green Ratio, g/C 0.37 0.37 0.50 0.50 0.50 Uniform Delay, d� 13.2 12.1 9.0 8.4 8.4 Progression Factor, PF 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Delay Calibration, k 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 Incremental Delay, d2 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 Initial Queue Delay, d3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Control Delay 13.3 12.1 9.2 8.5 8.5 Lane Group LOS g g A A A Approach Delay 13.3 9.2 8.5 Approach LOS B A A Intersection Delay 9,7 X� = 0.30 Intersection LOS A Copyright�O 2007 University of Flortda,All Rights Reserved HCS+rM Version 5.3 Generated: 4/9/2012 1:34 PM file://C:\Documents and Settings�rpergolizzi.GULFCOAST\Local Settings\Temp\s2kFC.tmp 4/9/2012 Two-Way Stop Control Page 1 of 1 . ' TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Anal st VT Intersection PAPAYA ST/EAST SHORE DR A enc /Co. GCC Jurisdiction CITY OF CLEARWATER Date Performed 4/16/2012 Anal sis Year EXISTlNG 2012 Anai sis Time Period MlD DAY PEAK Pro'ect Descri tion FRENCHY'S#441 EAST SHORE DRIVE East/West Street: PAPAYA STREET North/South Street: EAST SHORE DRIVE Intersection Orientation: North-South Stud Period hrs : 0.25 ehicle Volumes and Ad'ustments Ma'or Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R olume veh/h 33 132 6 1 9 8 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 34 136 6 1 9 8 veh/h Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- -- 0 -- -- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR U stream Si nal 0 0 Minor Street Eastbound Westbound M ovement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R olume veh/h 2 6 17 2 0 2 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 2 6 17 2 0 2 veh/h Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade(%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR Dela , Queue Len th,and Level of Service pproach Northbound Southbound Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LTR LTR LTR LTR (veh/h) 34 1 4 25 C (m) (veh/h) 1613 1453 791 903 lc 0.02 0.00 0.01 0.03 95% queue length 0.06 0.00 0.02 0.09 Control Delay(s/veh) 7.3 7.5 9.6 9.1 LOS A A A A pproach Delay(s/veh) -- -- 9.6 9.1 pproach LOS -- -- A A Copyright�O 2010 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.6 Generated: 4/16/2012 12:01 PM file:///C:/LTsers/vtoma/AppData/LocaUTemp/u2kBE85.tmp 4/16/2012 Two-Way Stop Control Page 1 of 1 . , TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Anal st VT Intersection PAPAYA ST/EAST SHORE DR A enc /Co. GCC Jurisdiction CITY OF CLEARWATER Date Pertormed 4/16/2012 Anal sis Year EXISTlNG 2012 Anal sis Time Period PM PEAK Pro'ect Descri tion FRENCHY'S#441 EAST SHORE DRIVE East/West Street: PAPAYA STREET North/South Street: EAST SHORE DRIVE Intersection Orientation: North-South Stud Period hrs : 0.25 ehicle Volumes and Ad'ustments Ma'or Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R olume veh/h 39 138 1 0 24 2 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 42 151 1 0 26 2 veh/h Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- -- 0 -- -- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR U stream Si na� 0 0 Minor Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R olume veh/h 6 1 17 0 0 0 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 6 1 18 0 0 0 veh/h Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade(%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR Dela ,Queue Len th,and Level of Service pproach Northbound Southbound Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LTR LTR LTR LTR (veh/h) 42 0 0 25 C (m) (veh/h) 1599 1441 909 /c 0.03 0.00 0.03 95%queue length 0.08 0.00 0.08 Control Delay(s/veh) 7.3 7.5 g.1 LOS A A q pproach Delay(s/veh) -- -- g.� pproach LOS -- -- q Copyright�O 2010 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved HCS+7M Version 5.6 Generated: 4/16/2012 11:59 AM file:///C:/LTsers/vtoma/AppData/Local/Temp/u2kCOFA.tmp 4/16/2012 Two-Way Stop Control Page 1 of 1 � ' TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Anal st VT Intersection PAPAYA ST/PO/NSETTIA A enc /Co. GCC VE Date Performed 4/16/2012 Jurisdiction CITY OF CLEARWATER Anal sis Time Period MID DAY PEAK nal sis Year EXISTING 2012 Pro'ect Descri tion FRENCHY'S#441 EAST SHORE DRIVE East/West Street: PAPAYA STREET North/South Street: POINSETTIA AVE Intersection Orientation: North-South Stud Period hrs : 0.25 ehicle Volumes and Ad'ustments Ma'or Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R olume veh/h 5 63 23 2 75 11 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 5 70 25 2 83 12 veh/h Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- -- 0 -- -- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR U stream Si nal 0 0 Minor Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R olume veh/h 10 9 7 12 11 22 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 11 10 7 13 12 24 veh/h Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade(%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR Dela , Queue Len th,and Level of Service pproach Northbound Southbound Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LTR LTR LTR LTR v(veh/h) 5 2 49 28 C(m) (veh/h) 1512 1512 835 765 v/c 0.00 0.00 0.06 0.04 95%queue length 0.01 0.00 0.19 0.11 Control Delay(s/veh) 7.4 7.4 9.6 9.9 LOS A A A A pproach Delay(s/veh) -- -- 9.6 9.9 pproach LOS -- -- A A Copyright OO 2010 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved HCS+rm Version 5.6 Generated: 4/16/2012 11:49 AM file:U/C:/LTsers/vtomalAppDatalLocal/Temp/u2k2024.tmp 4/16/2012 Two-Way Stop Control Page 1 of 1 � . TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Anal st VT Intersection PAPAYA ST/PO/NSETTIA VE A enc /Co. GCC Jurisdiction CITYOFCLEARWATER Date PerFormed 4/16/2012 Anal sis Year EXIST/NG 2012 Anal sis Time Period PM PEAK Pro'ect Descri tion FRENCHY'S#441 EAST SHORE DRIVE East/West Street: PAPAYA STREET North/South Street: POINTSETTIA AVE Intersection Orientation: North-South Stud Period hrs : 0.25 ehicle Volumes and Ad'ustments Ma'or Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R olume veh/h 8 79 9 2 85 8 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR s 85 9 2 92 8 veh/h Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- -- 0 -- -- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR U stream Si nal 0 0 Minor Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R olume veh/h 12 5 8 9 11 24 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 13 5 8 9 11 26 veh/h Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 D 0 Percent Grade(%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR Dela ,Queue Len th,and Level of Service pproach Northbound Southbound Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LTR LTR LTR LTR (veh/h) 8 2 46 26 C(m) (veh/h) 1505 1513 836 764 lc 0.01 0.00 0.06 0.03 95%queue length 0.02 0.00 0.17 0.11 Control Delay(s/veh) 7.4 7.4 9.6 9.9 LOS A A A A pproach Delay(s/veh) -- -- g,6 g,g pproach LOS -- -- A A Copyright O 2010 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.6 Generated: 4/16/2012 11:55 AM file:///C:/LJsers/vtomalAppData/Local/Temp/u2k4495.tmp 4/16/2012 �.- __ ___ _ __ __ _ ___ . ' I ABL� � Generalized Pe�� €�ou9'�I w�-�094�y Volumes for Florida's 11�b��tiz�d ,4r�a� 1o/a/10 STATE SIGI�TAI�IZED E�I2T�RIALS �REE�VAYS CI�SS I(>0.00 to 1.99 si�alized intersections per mile) Lanes B C D E Lanes Median B C D E 4 4,000 5,500 6,770 7,300 2 Undivided 930 1,500 1 *** 6 6,000 8,320 10,150 11,290 4 Divided 2,840 3,440 3 560 *** 8 8,000 11,050 13,480 15,270 6 Divided 4,370 5,200 5,360 *** l0 10,000 13,960 16,930 19,250 8 Divided 5,900 6,970 7,160 *T* 12 13,730 18,600 21,950 23,230 �U��`� Freeway Adjustments C1a5S II(2.00 to 4.50 signalized intersections per mile) Auxiliary Ramp Lanes Median B C D E Lanes Metering 2 Undivided ^'T 1,020 1,480 1,570 +1,800 +5% 4 Divided ** 2,420 3,220 3,400 6 Divided '** 3,790 4,880 5,150 �INTERRUPTED Y+'LOW HIGHWAYS �� D�ided ** S�l�g 6�5�3�0 6,880 �L7 Cr%�4 (,t��.��`�� 2,ty'�c� Zclp� Lanes Median B C D E Class III/IV(more than 4.50 signalized intersections per mile) 2 Undivided 730 1,460 2,080 2,620 Lanes Median B C D E 4 Divided 3,220 4,660 6,040 6,840 2 Undivided ** 500 1,150 1,440 6 Divided 4,840 6,990 9,060 10,280 4 Divided ** 1,220 2,730 3,100 Uninterrupted Flow Highway Adjustments 6 Divided ** 1,910 4,240 4,680 Lanes Median Exclusive left lanes Adjustrnent factors 8 Divided ** 2,620 5,770 6,280 2 Divided Yes +5% Multi Undivided Yes -5% Mulii Undivided No -25% Non-St�te Signaiazed Roadway�sdjust�eaats BICYCLE MODEZ (Alter corresponding state volumes by the indicated percent.) (Muitiply motorized vehicle volumes shown below by number of directional roadway lanes to determine iwo-way maximum service volumes.) Major City/County Roadways - 10% Paued Shoulder/Bicycle Lane �-°-"'-�'� Other SignalizedRoadways -35% C4P�S'"T.�, Coverage B C D E 0-49% ** 310 l�lg� �l�it4.� State&Nom-State Signalized Roadway Adjustments 50-84% 240 360 >360 *** (Alter corresponding state volutnes by the indicated percent.) 85-100% 620 >620 *** *�* Dividec�/Umdivided&Turn Lamme Adjustments p�+DESTRIAN MODEZ Exclusive Exclusive Adjushnent Lanes Median Left Lanes Right Lanes Fac (Mulriply motorized vehicle volumes shown below by number of directional a 2 Divided Yes No +So� roadway lanes to deterxnine two-way maximum service volumes.) ?'2 Undivided No No -20% 5idewalk Coverage B C D E Multi Undivided Yes No -5% 0-49% ** ** 480 1,390 Multi Undivided No No -25% 50-84% ** ^`* 1,100 1,820 - Yes +5% 85-100% ** 1,100 1,820 >1,820 One-Way Facility Adjustffient BUS MODE(Scheduled Figed Route)3 (Buses in peak hour in peak d'uection) Multiply the corresponding two-directional volumes in this table by 0.6. Sidewalk Covera e S C D E S g �� c�,��.� C � �. 0-84% >5 >4 >3 >2 �,�,� t�� o tioa� ss-100% >4 >3 >2 >1 � Values shown are presented as hourly two-way volumes for levels of service and are for the automobilekruck modes unless specifically stated Althoueh presented as peak hour two- way volumes,they actually represent peak hour peak direction condirions with an appficable D factor applied This table does not constitute a standerd and should be used only for general planning applications.The computer models from which this tablt is derived should be used for more specific planning applications.The table and denving computer models should not be used£nr corridor or intersection design,where more refined tecbniques exist.Calculations are based on planning applications of the Highway Capacity Manual,Bicycle LOS Model,Pedestrian LOS Model and Transit Capacity and Quality of Servica Manual,respectively fnr the automobile/fruck,bicycle,pedeshian and bus modes. 2 Level of service for the bicycle and pedesirian modes in this table is based on number of motorized velucles,not number of bicyclists or pedestrians using the facility. 3 Buses per hour shown aze only for the peak hour in the single d'uection of the hi@her lraffic flow. SOUYC2: =*ca�ot be ach�eved us�g�bie�puc vatue defaulrs. Florida Department of Transportation ***Not applicable for that level of service letter p�ade.For the automobile mode,volumes greater than level of service D Systems Planning Office become F because intersection capacities have been reached.For the bicycle mode,the level of service letter�ade(including 60�Suwannee Street,MS 19 F)is not achievable because there is no maximum vehicle volume threshold using table input value defaults. T3ll3113SS00�FL 32399-0450 www.dot.state.fl.us/pjanning/svstems/sm/los/default.shtm Z009 FDOT QUALITY/LEVEL OF SERVICE HANOBOOK ti APPENDIX B ._..-.- �-----"-�- __ c � ' High-Turnover (Sit-Down) Restaurant (932) Average Vehicle Trip Ends vs: 1000 Sq. Feet Gross Floor Area On a: Weekday Number of Studies: 14 Average 1000 Sq. Feet GFA: 7 Directional Distribution: 50% entering, 50% exiting � Trip Generation per 1000 Sq. Feet Gross Floor Area Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation 127.15 73.51 - 246.00 41.77 Data Plot and Equation 1,500 , , , 1,400 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - � - - - - -,- - - - - -;- - - - - - - - ,- - - - - - -o=�- - - - - - - - ; ; ; , X� , 1,300 - - - - - - - --- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - � - - '- - - - - - - - - - - - , , , , i� X , , , , , . � 1,200 - - - - � --- - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - -�� - -,- - - - - - - - -, - - - - - - � , , , � , , , , W , , , , , Q , , - - - - - - � 1,100 - - - - � ; - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - -, . . - - - -, - - - - - - -,- -X I N , , , , , V , , . "� . � 1,000 - - - � ; - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - --- - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - ,- - - - � � X . , ; j : , , , I� � - - - - - - " . - - - - - - -X- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - " - -, - - - - - " ' -,- - - " " - - -, - " " ' - - -,- - - - - - . . � 900 ; X �v� , � a ; ; ; ; I I X i , ,'� , - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - � ~ 800 X - - - •- - - - - - - - • - - - . . . -• - - � � - - - - � ' ; : � ;X , . . � 700 ' - - -X - - -,- � � - - - . . . - - - - - - - � -; - � - - - - - - - -- - - - - ,X X �� , , , , . - - - � � - � - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - � - - - - - •- - - - - - - - � 600 - - - - -, . ., - � - - -° - - - - - �- X , , . 500 � 4 5 6 7 S 9 10 11 12 I. (: X= 1000 Sq. Feet Gross Floor Area � X Actual Data Points ------ Average Rate t�. ;;. Fitted Curve Equation: Not given RZ=**** 'k$ Trip Generafion,8th Edition 1795 Institute of Transportation Engineers .s,; J' �i. �I#!I � � � High-Turnover (Sit-Down) Restaurant (932) �; Average Vehicle Trip Ends vs: 1000 Sq. Feet Gross Floor Area On a: Weekday, P.M. Peak Hour of Generator i �, Number of Studies: 31 Average 1000 Sq. Feet GFA: 5 Directional Distribution: 54% entering, 46% exiting �; Trip Generation per 1000 Sq. Feet Gross Floor Area Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation 18.49 5.60 - 69.20 13.32 Data Plot and Equation 220 , , , , , . , , 210 � - - - - � - - - -�- . . . -�- - - - -�-� - - -• - - � - - -�- - - - -�- - - - - -. . .._ . . , : , , , : , � �' -�- - - - - - - � - - -�- - . . . .... . . - - - - 200 - - - - � - - °- - - - - -�- - - - - - - - - � - - X ' 190 - � � - - - -;- - - - - ;- - - - � -;- - - - - -� - - - � - - - - -,- - - - - � -;- - - - - -�- - - - - -• - - - - - - 180 - - - � �'- - - - - - � - - . . . �- - - �'- - - -°�-'- - - - - - -'- - - - - - - - - ' - - - - -;- - - - � - - X- - -: , , , X , - - - - - - - - - 170 - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - � , - - - - - N160 - - - - � - - - - - - - - - -, � - � - , - - - ,- - - - - - - - - - - - --- - - - - - - - --- - - - - --- - - - - � � , , , ,'� W150 - - - - - ' X - - - - �'- - - - - - �- - - - -'- - - - - -'- - - - - - - ' - - - - - - =�� - - - -'- - - - -; - - - - - Q , , , . , - - - - - � 140 - - - - - -, - � - - - - - - - - - - - - - - , - - - ; - - - - - - - - - -, - - - - - - - - - - -; , � - - � 130 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - � - - � ,- - - - -,- - - - -; - - - - - - - - - - - - -,- - - � - - , - - - - -,- - - - ; - � - - - - V . , . , . , . , . , � � 120 - - - - - - - - - - - - -� - - - -;- - - - - -;- - - -X- -;-X-,-�� - i - - - ;- - - - - - -:- - - - -X - - - -;- -X- - - ro 110 - - - - - - ; - - - - - ;- - - - �',- - - - - - -: - - - X,-�SC-/ - - - - ; - - - - - ;- - - - - ; - - - � -;- - - -X- -;- - X- - - , , ,'X , ; , , , a� 100 - - - - � - - . . . - - - - - - - - - - - -�- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -,� - - - - -; - -�- - - > ; : ; � ; , ; , , a 90 - - -- - - - - -- - - - -- - - - ; - - - ; - - - ; - - -;- - -;- - - - - -,- - - - - ; - - - - - � � , , ,X , , , , SO - - - - - - - - - - � - �- - - ; . . - - � - - - - - - - - ,- - - - - - - - - - XX : ; X ; - - - 70 - - - - - ; - - - - -;<- - - - :X -j�- - -; - - ; - • - - - - ;- ;- - - - - - -; - � - - - , , , X , , , , 60 - - - - • - - - - ' -•- - - -• - � - - - -�- - - - •- - - - - - -�- - - - - - -• - - � - - -� - - - - - - �. X , X X . , , , , , , , , 5o x.k.- - - - - -� - - - - - � - - - - - - - - • - - - - -�- - - - - -�- � - - - - -�- � - - - . . . . _ . . . - - - , - - - ' X : ; : : ; 40 - - - - - - - --- - - - - --- - � - - -,- - - -� - - - - - � - - - - - -;- - - - -;- � - � - , - - - - ; - - - 3p - - - ; - - - ;- - - - - - - - -X - - -� - - - - ; - - - - - - �- - - - - - --- - - - --- - - - - - -- - - - - - 20 � � � 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 X= 1000 Sq. Feet Gross Floor Area X Actual Data Points ----" Average Rate � Fitted Curve Equation: Not given RZ="**" � Trip Generation,8th Edition 1799 Institute of Transportation Engineers i I ` I l �'� �? High-Turnover (Sit-Down) Restaurant � . (932) j Average Vehicle Trip Ends vs: 1000 Sq. Feet Gross Floor Area I On a: Weekday, � Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic, , One Hour Between 4 and 6 p.m. i I� Number of Studies: 46 ; Average 1000 Sq. Feet GFA: 6 ; Directional Distribution: 59% entering, 41% exiting � Trip Generation per 1000 Sq. Feet Gross Floor Area Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation ; 11.15 2.80 - 62.00 9.13 Data Plot and Equation : zzo � 210 - - - - - * - ; - - - - ; � - - - - - - - - ; - -; � - ;- - - - -;- - - ; - -,- - - - ; - - - �'� , , . , , , , , � 200 - - • - - - -� - - - - - , - - - - - - - -� - - - --- - - - - - - - - - - 190 - - - - - ; - - - - - - - - - - ,- - - - �- - - - - -, - - - - , - - - - - -�- - - - ' 180 - - - - ' - - - = - - - - - = - - -9C- - - ,- - - - - - - - - - - -'- - - - - ,- - - - ; - - - - � 170 - . . . . _ - � = - � - - - - - - - - -' - - - - - -' - - - - - - - - - - - ' 160 � - - � = - � - ' - - - '- - - - ' - � '- - - - '- - '- - -' - - -�. . . . - ' - - ' - - - - � � X . , , . , . X , 'i c 150 - - , � � ; � - - --- - - - - --- - - - - - - - -- - - - - -, - -, - , - � - � , - - - - - - W , , , . , Ia 140 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - --- - - - - - - ,- - - - -,- - - - -, - - - - - - - - - - - ; - - - - � � . . , , , ,_ . . . - - - - - - -� - - - - � - - - � 130 � - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - � - - - - - - - - - - -,- - - - -, , j , , � � 120 - - - • - - - - ' - - - - ._ . . . . ,- - -'- - - -' - - ; - - - - - - - - -, - - - - - -; - - - ; - 1 m ; ; ; , , , ; � 110 - - ; - - - ; - - - - - -- - - - - - - X - - - - - - ; - - - - - - - , - - - - - ; - ; - - - - - � ro 100 - - - � - - - - - = - - - - = - - - - - - ,- - - -;- - - - :�� - - - -;- - - - -, - X - -• - - - - ; - - - - - � Q 90 - - - - - ; - - - - � - - - - - - - - ->E- - ;- - - - -X- ; X -; - - - � - - - � - - - - iII gp - - - - - ; - - - - - � - - . . . - - X- - - -�'��/ � - - - ; - . .;. . ; - - , -X- - � ; ; x ; , , , X X� -:3�-'. ' 7p - - - - - - - - j� - - - - - -�X - :� - - - -- - - - - - - - - 60 - - - - - -X X-�- - - -�-�jX - - - - ; - - - - ;- , - - - X ; - - - , - - M i50 - - . . . . - - X -,- %C - - -,- -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - � - . . � X X , , '1 4p - X ; - � - ',��--`�', - - � - - -X ;- - - - -, - - - ; - - - � X , x,. XXX. _ , , , j3p - - - ; - - ; - - - - - - - x - ,- - - - - - -, - - - - -, - - - - -; - - - � 2p X�,-� ; //X- - : - - - X - - - ;- - - - - - - --- - - - - - - - = . . . - - , , X , , 10 i 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 � X=1000 Sq. Feet Gross Floor Area _ ; X Actual Data Points -----' Average Rate ,z Fitted Curve Equation: Not given R2-**** ;� '�' '� Trip Generation,8th Edition 1797 Institute of Transportation Engineers ��>c. ::ki �r!�; t_�k; Two-Way Stop Control Page 1 of 1 , . ' TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Anal st RP Intersection CAUSEWAY/EAST SHORE A enc /Co. GCC Jurisdiction CLEARWATER Date Performed 4/17/2012 Anal sis Year 2013 WITH PROJECT Anal sis Time Period MIDDAYPEAK Pro'ect Descri tion FRENCHY'S#441 EAST SHORE DRIVE East/West Street: CAUSEWAY BLVD North/South Street: EAST SHORE(RT ONLY) Intersection Orientation: East-West Stud Period hrs : 0.25 ehicie Volumes and Ad'ustments Ma"or Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R olume veh/h 1059 835 236 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.97 0.97 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 1091 0 0 860 243 veh/h Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- -- 0 -- -- Median Type Raised curb RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 2 0 0 2 0 Configuration T T TR U stream Si nal 0 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R olume veh/h 114 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 0 0 0 0 117 veh/h Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 2 Percent Grade(%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 1 Configuration R Dela ,Queue Len th,and Level of Service pproach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration R (veh/h) 117 C (m) (veh/h) 531 v/c 0.22 95%queue length 0.83 Control Delay(s/veh) 13J LOS 8 pproach Delay(s/veh) -- -- 13.7 pproach LOS -- -- 8 Copyright�O 2010 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.6 Generated: 4/17/2012 11:14 AM file:///C:/LTsers/vtoma/AppData/LocaUTemp/u2k 1 E6A.tmp 4/17/2012 Two-Way Stop Control Page 1 of 1 . • ,� . , TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Anal st RP Intersection CAUSEWAY/EAST A enc /Co. GCC SHORE Jurisdiction CLEARWATER Date Performed 4/17/2012 Anal sis Year 2013 WITH PROJECT Anal sis Time Period PM PEAK Pro'ect Descri tion FRENCHY'S#441 EAST SHORE DRIVE East/West Street: CAUSEWAY BLVD North/South Street: EAST SHORE(RT ONLY) Intersection Orientation: East-West Stud Period hrs : 0.25 ehicle Volumes and Ad'ustments Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R olume veh/h 1254 809 218 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR � 1320 0 0 851 229 veh/h Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- -- 0 -- -- Median Type Raised curb RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 2 0 0 2 0 Configuration T T TR U stream Si nal 0 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R olume veh/h 119 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 0 0 0 0 122 veh/h Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 2 Percent Grade(%) 0 � Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 1 Configuration R Dela ,Queue Len th,and Level of Service pproach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration R v(veh/h) 122 C(m) (veh/h) 540 v/c 0.23 95%queue length 0.86 Control Delay(s/veh) 13.6 LOS 8 pproach Delay(s/veh) -- -- 13.6 pproach LOS -- -- 8 Copyright O 2010 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.6 Generated: 4l17/2012 12:51 PM file:///C:/Users/vtoma/AppData/Local/Temp/u2k317E.tmp 4/17/2012 Detailed Report Page 1 of 1 . , . , � � HCS+'� DETAILED REPORT Genera/Informafion U �. t ," � ..r .-�.x : ��i:. .;` ' °`:Site`lnforinafion�x.M��,,E,� Y ,� _��, ,a e u� �s� � ,��., q , r Analyst RP Intersection MANDALAY/BAYMONT Agency or Co. GCC Area Type All other areas Date PerFormed 4/17/2012 Jurisdiction CLEARWATER Time Period M/DDAY PEAK Analysis Year 2013 WITH PROJECT Project ID �m s�_ ' �' �''� ��t s�,bc i x�,"� 4 i �i � z ��" a�� +:�^�5� "°a.sq"�i".4 � *� ��. '�I� "k�s �u.��' � �x4'��: Vo%ume.anal�Tlmir►"��`In uf�H�.��,�3.,.,� . �;��.�t�., �., �;5�� , � ��;�� r; . �,_��,. . P °�. ;, . � � . ,a , . ,� . .,.. EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT � LT � TH � RT � Number of Lanes, N� 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 2 0 Lane Group LTR LTR � �LTR � � LTR Volume,V(vph) 7 � 44 20 � 124 � 47 � 375 � 14 38 388 13 % Heavy Vehicles, %HV 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.94 0.93 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Pretimed (P)or Actuated A) A A A A A A A A A A A A Start-up Lost Time, I� 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Extension of Effective Green, e 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival Type,AT 3 3 3 � � 3 � � Unit Extension, UE � �3.0 3.0 3.0 � �3.0 � � Filterin /Metering, I 1.000 1.000 1.000 � �_�1.000 � � Initial Unmet Demand, Qb � 0.0 0.0 � � 0.0 � 0.0 Ped/Bike/RTOR Volumes 94 D 15 61 0 11 80 0 ( 0 51 0 � 0 Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Parking/Grade/Parking N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N Parking Maneuvers, Nm Buses Stopping, NB 0 0 0 0 Min.Time for Pedestrians, Gp � 3.6 � 3.5 3.6 3.4 Phasing EW Perm 02 03 04 NS Perm � 06 � 07 08 G= 14.0 G = G= G= G= 38.0 G = G= G= Timing Y= 4 Y= Y= Y= Y= 4 Y= Y= Y= Duration of Analysis, T= 0.25 Cycle Length, C= 60.0 .�,�. �.�....�._ . _ Cane,:Grou`"Ca �aci , Control Dela ��and LOS Determination . '` _ �,M,��,,,. � ",x � ��; . P,,,��. .' , '�" EB WB NB SB LT TH � RT � LT � TH � RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Adjusted Flow Rate,v 47 146 464 467 Lane Group Capacity, c 380 �� 371 1960 �2005 v/c Ratio,X �0.12 0.39 0.24 0.23 Total Green Ratio, g/C 0.23 0.23 0.63 0.63 Uniform Delay, d� 18.2 19.4 4.7 4.7 Progression Factor, PF I 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Delay Calibration, k I 0.11 �0.11 �0.11 I 0.11 Incremental Delay, d2 I 0.1 0.7 0.1 0.1 Initial Queue Delay, d3 0.0 � 0.0 0.0 0.0 Control Delay � 18.3 I 20.1 4.8 4.8 Lane Group LOS 8 C A A Approach Delay 18.3 20.1 4.8 4.8 Approach LOS B C A A Intersection Delay 7.4 X� = 0•28 Intersection LOS A Copyright�O 2007 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved HCS+rM Version 5.3 Generated: 4/17/2012 2:05 PM file://C:\Documents and Settings�rpergolizzi.GULFCOAST\Local Settings\Temp\s2k18B.tmp 4/17/2012 Detailed Report Page 1 of 1 � � � HCS+'" DETAILED REPORT Generaflnformafion��A..�.�.. .r , = 4` � �"` T�u��k -�� ` , Site Infor`►n`ation.�a ��w, n��- _ . . , � , . .�. . . �� Analyst RP Intersection MANDALAY/BAYMONT Agency or Co. GCC Area Type A/l other areas Date Performed 4/17/12 Jurisdiction CLEARWATER Time Period PM PEAK Analysis Year 2013 WITH PROJECT Project ID �r'�.,� p�,t2"� m ^ra:' -�� %�'k�f '�'�'-'"�3� 6 ��t�U` <Y� trr �i G�� .� `� ta�. Volume antl�Timin ln uf�`�*� z,�,,� � �r:��' �� . ��.,s� ,. ,� � ,�, � � � , __� � � .� � :, .. z�r � ar_ v P. ,� t .� .. r . �. EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Number of Lanes, N� 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 2 0 Lane Group LTR LTR LTR LTR Volume,V(vph) 12 3 51 31 12 112 42 362 14 44 472 16 % Heavy Vehicles, %HV 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 � 2 � 2 � Peak-Hour Factor, PHF �0.91 �0.91 �0.91 �0.91 �0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 Pretimed (P)or Actuated (A) A A A A A A A A A A A A Start-up Lost Time, I� 2.0 2.0 2.0 � 2.0 � � Extension of Effective Green, e 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival Type,AT � 3 � 3 3 � 3 � � Unit Extension, UE 3.0 � �3.0 � � 3.0 3.0 Filtering/Metering, I 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Initial Unmet Demand, Qb 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Ped/Bike/RTOR Volumes 172 0 15 54 0 11 112 0 0 33 0 0 Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12A � � Parking/Grade/Parking N 0 N N D N N 0 � N I N I 0 N Parking Maneuvers, Nm Buses Stopping, Ne � � 0 � � � � � � � � � � � 0 �� Min. Time for Pedestrians Gp � 4.0 � 3.4 � 3.7 � 3.3 Phasing EW Perm 02 03 04 NS Perm 06 07 08 G= 14.0 G= G= G= G = 38.0 G = G= G = Timing Y= 4 Y= Y= Y= Y= 4 Y= Y= Y= Duration of Analysis, T= 0.25 Cycle Length, C= 60.0 :�- �� ,> - - , . Lane;:G'rou Ca' `aci `;Contr"o1 Dela ,`and LOS Determinat►on; .r . ��; `F � �; � . :;' '�' Y'x`' 7 •°' � � ? . � EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Adjusted Flow Rate,v 56 � 158 459 585 Lane Group Capacity, c 364 367 �� 1946 1998 v/c Ratio,X 0.15 0.43 0.24 0.29 Total Green Ratio, g/C 0.23 � 0.23 ��0.63 _� 0.63 Uniform Delay, d� 18.3 I19.6 4.7 _J 5.0 Progression Factor, PF 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Delay Calibration, k I 0.11 0.11 I0.11 0.11 Incremental Delay, dZ 0.2 0.8 0.1 0.1 Initial Queue Delay, d3 0.0 I 0.0 I I 0.0 0.0 Control Delay I� 18.5 I 20.4 I I 4.8 5.0 Lane Group LOS I�� C A A Approach Delay 18.5 20.4 4.8 5.0 Approach LOS 8 C A A Intersection Delay 7.5 X� =0.33 Intersection LOS A Copyright OO 2007 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved HCS+rm Version 5.3 Generated: 4/17/2012 2:08 PM file://C:\Documents and Settings�rpergolizzi.GULFCOAST\Local Settings\Temp\s2k19D.tmp 4/17/2012 , Detailed Report Page 1 of 1 , � . � � ' HCS+�' DETAILED REPORT ;„n,�. .�:,: � �� , � �a�� < ��:�� Sife'�lnfdrmation..�`�;��;�,�r.��`r��' �:,��'�aF�, �, � ` �� ;� , Genera/�nfoi�riat�or► � ,,,,�..,�.._� . °� �`�� x. ,, �. , _.,�� ,:, , .. Analyst RP Intersection CORONADO/GULFVIEW Agency or Co. GCC Area Type A/l other areas Date PerFormed 4/17/12 Jurisdiction CLEARWATER Time Period MIDDAY PEAK Analysis Year 2013 WITH PROJECT Project ID g °rr�at?.� .x,,. .,�. ..z�ez«r.. �.v�'� 'e.. �'r ; w z,v�i4, �;„� s�,,"�" 3 i �'��`'" `(�� t� �� "r"A.�k3�,+5" x a � n �� '�'� � x� �. �/il."`,��:;i p`� �tt.��...�.� ��&#�'' r,„F'"..��'��`��P��'4� �r r.Y� ,5 ..1`z °�4, VO�UII]@ ahd�Tl/fllll .°�O Uf�� r,,�� ` m �� rxd 4�,��.f, :�cw�; ��k,,,��, �..._: x�,;I EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Number of Lanes, N� 2 0 0 2 2 2 Lane Group L LR LT T R Volume,V(vph) 256 27 1 535 382 362 % Heavy Vehicles, %HV 2 2 2 2 2 � 2 � Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.97 0.97 � � 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 Pretimed (P)or Actuated (A) A A A A A A Start-up Lost Time, I� 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Extension of Effective Green, e 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival Type,AT 3 3 3 3 3 Unit Extension, UE 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Filtering/Metering, I 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Initial Unmet Demand, Qb 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 � 0.0 � Ped/Bike/RTOR Volumes 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 45 0 � 0 � Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Parking/Grade/Parking N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N Parking Maneuvers, Nm � Buses Stopping, Ns 0 0 0 0 0 Min. Time for Pedestrians, GP 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.4 Phasing EB Only 02 03 04 NS Perm 06 07 08 G= 22.0 G = G= G= G= 30.0 G= G = G = Timing Y= 4 Y= Y= Y= Y= 4 Y= Y= Y= Duration of Analysis, T= 0.25 Cycle Length, C= 60.0 � �,s� ��.,x: ,��: ,�� - ��.� �,: „ p � Lane':Grou Ca aci , Control°Dela analLOS:Determ�nation�°��;'�.� . $ �Y``; .� -��`�� ,} ."u;± '��k.�� ::�r �}' = ;s, � � EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Adjusted Flow Rate,v 264 28 553 394 373 Lane Group Capacity, c I 1260 580 � 1693 1774 1402 v/c Ratio,X 0.21 0.05 0.33 0.22 0.27 Total Green Ratio, g/C 0.37 0.37 � �0.50 0.50 0.50 Uniform Delay, d� 13.0 12.3 9.0 8.4 8.7 Progression Factor, PF 1.000 1.000 � I1.000 I I 1.000 1.000 Delay Calibration, k I0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 Incremental Delay, d2 0.1 D.0 I I 0.1 0.1 0.1 Initial Queue Delay, d3 0.0 0.0 � I I 0.0 0.0 0.0 Control Delay 13.1 12.3 �� 9.1 I 8.5 8.8 Lane Group LOS 8 8 A A A Approach Delay 13.0 9.1 8.6 Approach LOS I 8 A A Intersection Delay g.6 X� _ �•28 Intersection LOS A Copyright O 2007 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.3 Generated: 4/17/2012 12:15 PM file://C:\Documents and Settings�rpergolizzi.GULFCOAST\Local Settings\Temp\s2kF3.tmp 4/17/2012 Detailed Report Page 1 of 1 , , . � � ' HCS+'� DETAILED REPORT t� � a� F � .',,.. ,,4 � :S�te;lnformation�'�'��;�;��,{ , i�'r,'��..�.,_,..��ii. ��" � � ,��A �� , , �. �� Generallnforniatloii .,, .,.,; „ �., �,. ��.n �� : °� Analyst RP Intersection CORONADO/GULFV/EW Agency or Co. GCC Area Type A/l other areas Date Pertormed 4/17/12 Jurisdiction CLEARWATER Time Period PM PEAK Analysis Year 2013 WITH PROJECT Project ID �� r,=��x�� ,�:�-�. � ,...��a � ��:� _� � � �, � �� ,,� �,� r; �,�� : �� z�x� � r ;Volume.anal�T�m�n �In ut�.��„�� t._�::��-� ��,�,��,�h s�,��-��°��="�r{,�... v ;��. ��.��u �:�4��,��r� ��r �`��E�,��;�;�; ,.:, � ..,... w� EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Number of Lanes, N� 2 0 0 2 2 2 Lane Group L LR LT T � R � Volume,V(vph) 296 10 0 641 421 � 287 � % Heavy Vehicles, %HV 2 2 2 2 2 2 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 Pretimed (P) or Actuated (A) A A A A A A Start-up Lost Time, I� 2.0 2.0 � 2.0 2.0 2.0 Extension of Effective Green, e 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 � 2.0 � Arrival Type,AT 3 3 _� 3 3 3 Unit Extension, UE 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Filtering/Metering, I 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Initial Unmet Demand, Qb 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Ped/Bike/RTOR Volumes 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 45 0 0 Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 �12.0 12.0 Parking/Grade/Parking N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N J Parking Maneuvers, Nm Buses Stopping, Na 0 0 0 0 0 Min. Time for Pedestrians, Gp 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.4 Phasing EB Only 02 03 04 NS Perm 06 07 08 G = 22.0 G= G = G = G= 30.0 G= G = G= Timing Y= 4 Y= Y= Y= Y= 4 Y= Y= Y= Duration of Analysis,T= 0.25 Cycle Length, C= 60.0 .�� . ,�� a.� �, _.�,,.. �_ � .�. � �. .., . .�. �L"ane;'Grou�`��Ca aci ,°Confrol��ela ,�anaLLOS�Deter`irima�ion�`... �,��,_.��«.� �� r ' :.F�r�� `��k�� ' �� ` �'> ' �� ,v_, ,r_,5.a.,�.;s EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Adjusted Flow Rate,v 318 11 689 453 309 Lane Group Capacity, c I 1260 580 1774 1774 1402 v/c Ratio,X 0.25 0.02 0.39 0.26 0.22 Total Green Ratio, g/C 0.37 0.37 0.50 0.50 0.50 Uniform Delay, d� I13.3 12.1 I 9.3 8.6 8.4 Progression Factor, PF 1.000 1.000 I 1.000 1.000 1.000 Delay Calibration, k 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 Incremental Delay, d2 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 Initial Queue Delay, d3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Control Delay 13.4 12.1 9.4 8.7 8.5 Lane Group LOS 8 8 A A A Approach Delay 13.3 9.4 8.6 Approach LOS 8 A A Intersection Delay g.8 X� = 0.33 Intersection LOS A Copyright O 2007 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.3 Generated: 4/17/2012 12:14 PM file://C:\Documents and Settings�rpergolizzi.GULFCOAST\Local Settings\Temp\s2kDl.tmp 4/17/2012 Two-Way Stop Control Page 1 of 1 . �� .. t � � TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Anal st VT Intersection PAPAYA ST/EAST SHORE A enc /Co. GCC DR Jurisdiction CITY OF CLEARWATER Date Performed 4/17/2012 Anal sis Year 2013 WITH PROJECT Anal sis Time Period MID DAY PEAK Pro'ect Descri tion FRENCHY'S#441 EAST SHORE DRIVE East/West Street: PAPAYA STREET North/South Street: EAST SHORE DRIVE Intersection Orientation: North-South Stud Period hrs : 0.25 ehicle Volumes and Ad'ustments Ma'or Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R olume veh/h 33 175 43 1 52 8 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 34 180 44 1 53 8 veh/h Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- -- 0 -- -- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR U stream Si nal 0 0 Minor Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R olume veh/h 15 31 17 2 55 0 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR �5 31 17 2 56 0 veh/h Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade(%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR Dela ,Queue Len th,and Level of Service pproach Northbound Southbound Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LTR LTR LTR LTR (veh/h) 34 1 58 63 C(m) (veh/h) 1555 1357 574 634 v/c 0.02 0.00 0.10 0.10 95%queue length 0.07 0.00 0.34 0.33 Control Delay(s/veh) 7.4 7.7 12.0 11.3 LOS A A 8 8 pproach Delay(s/veh) -- -- 12.0 11.3 pproach LOS -- -- 8 8 Copyright O 2010 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.6 Generated: 4/17/2012 11:25 AM file:///C:/Users/vtoma/AppData/LocaUTemp/u2kDDA3.tmp 4/17/2012 Two-Way Stop Control Page 1 of 1 , �� .. ! ,� ` TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Anal st VT Intersection PAPAYA ST/EAST SHORE A enc /Co. GCC DR Date PerFormed 4/97/2012 Jurisdiction CITYOF CLEARWATER Anal sis Time Period PM PEAK nal sis Year 2013 WITH PROJECT Pro'ect Descri tion FRENCHY'S#441 EAST SHORE DRIVE East/West Street: PAPAYA STREET North/South Street: EAST SHORE DRIVE Intersection Orientation: North-South Stud Period hrs : 0.25 ehicle Volumes and Ad'ustments Ma'or Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R olume veh/h 39 160 26 0 64 2 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 42 175 28 0 70 2 veh/h Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- -- 0 -- -- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR U stream Si nal 0 0 Minor Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R olume veh/h 16 17 17 0 28 0 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 17 18 18 0 30 0 veh/h Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade(%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR Dela , Queue Len th,and Level of Service pproach Northbound Southbound Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LTR LTR LTR LTR (veh/h) 42 0 30 53 C(m) (veh/h) 1541 1381 563 656 v/c 0.03 0.00 0.05 0.08 95%queue length 0.08 0.00 0.17 0.26 Control Delay(s/veh) 7.4 7.6 11.8 11.0 LOS A A 8 g pproach Delay(s/veh) -- -- 11.8 11.0 pproach LOS -- -- 8 8 Copyright�O 2010 University of Florida,AII Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.6 Generated: 4/17/2012 12:45 PM file:///C:/LJsers/vtoma/AppDatalLocaUTemp/u2k5A43.tmp 4/17/2012 Two-Way Stop Control Page 1 of 1 ,, ,� .. � �,, . TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Anal st VT Intersection PAPAYA ST/POINSETTIA A enc /Co. GCC VE Date PerFormed 4/17/2012 urisdiction CITY OF CLEARWATER nal sis Time Period MID DAY PEAK Anal sis Year 2013 W/TH PROJECT Pro'ect Descri tion FRENCHY'S#441 EAST SHORE DRIVE East/West Street: PAPAYA STREET North/South Street: PO/NSETT/A AVE Intersection Orientation: North-South Stud Period hrs : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Ad'ustments Major Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R olume veh/h 5 63 55 2 75 11 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 5 70 61 2 83 12 veh/h Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- -- 0 -- -- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR U stream Si nal 0 0 Minor Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R olume veh/h 10 15 7 60 16 22 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 11 16 7 66 17 24 veh/h Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade(%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR Dela ,Queue Len th,and Level of Service pproach Northbound Southbound Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LTR LTR LTR LTR v(veh/h) 5 2 107 34 C(m) (veh/h) 1512 1467 761 726 lc 0.00 0.00 0.14 0.05 95%queue length 0.01 0.00 0.49 0.15 Control Delay(s/veh) 7.4 7.5 10.5 10.2 LOS A A 8 8 pproach Delay(s/veh) -- -- 10.5 10.2 pproach LOS -- -- 8 8 Copyright O 2010 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved NCS+TM Version 5.6 Generated: 4/17/2012 12:48 PM file:///C:/Users/vtoma/AppDatalLocaUTemp/u2k16C3.tmp 4/17/2012 Two-Way Stop Control Page 1 of 1 _ ,� � # �. . TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information nal st VT Intersection PAPAYA ST/PO/NSETTIA A enc /Co. GCC VE Jurisdiction CITY OF CLEARW,4TER Date Performed 4/17/2012 Anal sis Year 2013 WITH PROJECT nal sis Time Period PM PEAK Pro'ect Descri tion FRENCHY'S#441 EAST SHORE DRIVE East/West Street: PAPAYA STREET North/South Street: POINTSETTIA AVE Intersection Orientation: North-South Stud Period hrs : 0.25 ehicle Volumes and Ad'ustments Major Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R olume veh/h 8 79 31 2 85 8 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 8 g5 33 2 92 8 veh/h Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- -- 0 -- -- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR U stream Si nal 0 0 Minor Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R olume veh/h 12 9 8 34 14 24 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 13 9 8 36 15 26 veh/h Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade(%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR Dela ,Queue Len th,and Level of Service pproach Northbound Southbound Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LTR LTR LTR LTR (veh/h) 8 2 77 30 C(m) (veh/h) 1505 1483 773 736 v/c 0.01 0.00 0.10 0.04 95% queue length 0.02 0.00 0.33 0.13 Control Delay(s/veh) 7.4 7.4 10.2 10.1 LOS A A 8 B pproach Delay(s/veh) -- -- 10.2 10.1 pproach LOS -- -- 8 8 Copyright O 2010 University of Florida,AII Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.6 Generated: 4/17/2012 12:46 PM file:///C:/LJsers/vtoma/AppData/Local/Temp/u2kB 186.tmp 4/17/2012 �SCALE: NTS COMMERCIAL DOCK Application# (OFFICIAL USE ONLY) TABLE OF CONTENTS SHEET 1 - EXISTING CONDITIONS SHEET 2 - PROPOSED DOCK DIMENSIONS SHEET 2B - PROPOSED BOARDWALK DIMENSIONS SHEET 3 - WATER DEPTHS AT MEAN LOW WATER AND BENTHIC CONDITIONS SHEET 4 - CROSS SECTION (A -A') SHEET 5 - CROSS SECTION (B - B') SHEET 6 - FIXED DOCK APPROACH & BOARDWALK DETAILS SHEET 7 - FIXED DOCK APPROACH & BOARDWALK DETAILS SHEET 8 - RAMP & FLOATING DOCK DETAILS SHEET 9 - RAMP & FLOATING DOCK DETAILS SHEET 10 - PILING WRAP DETAILS SHEET 11 - TURBIDITY DETAILS SHEET 12 - REFLECTIVE TAPE DETAILS SHEET 13 - SIGNAGE SHEET 14 - FIRE AND WATER PLAN SHEET 15 - FIRE DETAILS SHEET 16 - FIRE DETAILS SHEET 17 - ELECTRICAL 1 Thu, 10 May 2012-10:49am°�;P:1��rJat1�,'s Motel Docks(513-11)\CAD\FRENCHYS MASTER 2012.dwg �IN �� +, CERTIFICATE OF AUTHORIZATION: 27664 '•. / ,.�� ♦ � , .• � �55g6 �'•.� �� WOODS CONSULTING / . • ��a courrn Rono �, surr� �z r10 / ;CC� DUNEDIN FL 34698 F R E N C H Y1 S :`J ��jJ� PH. (727� 786-5747 `� � �W� FAX (727) 786-7479 OfC . �yr•� � . � � �� TABLE OF CONTENTS '` � �'C?: REVISIONS .� , \Q:� �� •j�,�. L OP•. '�`�. � p� " `` V,�� , \�� ♦ I�� ,,'S i0'i,,�� SCAL�: 1" = 50' COMMERCIAL DOCK Application# (OFFICIAL USE ONLY) � � , . , , , � �, � n�� .�< a� �. ~,��. .'* �.. �,� � �� .. `�� ;�s� � � � ,��i�•�'`��1�� , � � ��,��, ed ��..Y:' .k��-'' �..y~�`I �� . , s*�� ,� T �� ;Ya .Y� gi�>� ��,• ' �441 EAST SHORE DR. PARCEL ID# � � � � ;�� , ;.. � :, �� y 08/29/15/02592/003/0010 �� `�` *�' �-° ��SHORELINE = 50.0 LF � �' , . . . � � � �. .� � NEW UPLAND RESTAURANT SITE �' y �425 EAST SHORE DR. PARCEL ID# $ ° 08/29/15/02592/003/0020 �� SHORELINE = 50.0 LF � ° s � � �• • : � • � � �UPLAND RESTAU SITE ' �"� � � � • _.....,.�. �� , , --- �pA ;. � . . �•• � �• �� 423 EAST SHORE DR. � ��~� PARCEL ID# y��, � 08/29/15/02592/003/0030 ��x' ' �� SHORELINE = 123.0 LF '�� '� � ,�� _ r.: OASIS MOTEL �� .:,. � NO UPLAND � �� CHANGE � ��' , ��. : 4. �• ' � ~ � � ;� � ' �. , ��;�"' � L � ��.�1� �"m`� � . .. 419 EAST SHORE DR. �PARCEL ID � a,. � #08/29/15/02592/003/0050 ��;� �� '� � SHORELINE = 77.0 LF g ` �, � _ _v A FRENCHY'S SEAFOOD �t � `q NO UPLAND .,� �� ' CHANGE - =s .--_�_. ;� _� � � ._ �.�-�:� ,� �::� . �� r � � � � --� _ .�.,. '� _ � � . � . � -� _ � � ,� �� ,w �� a`�. �� .�_� ��. ��; � � �� :�� , � � � � n � � ft..�� :�� ; ��.��,�F. �� . . . � ��g� ��°�� tm� �{ ��6�+ } `6 `R.� 3'r ,g�,'§,i�� n' • , - r� "�"- �,��; �d `a f�f#.' t�'�"'�'� -, x ,. �m � aa, �< , � .>.., �,-� _.,.,.. , -w �,.., , .. _ , z .... �. > �, � „�r a��' � ��,,� a��arianr.e.ar€� -- _��Grs� „�,:r�;,,; SHORELINE LENGTHS OBTAINED FROM PINELLAS COUNTY G.I.S. Thu, 10 May 2012-11:11arr��jr��h 's Mot�l Docks(513-11)\CAD\FRENCHYS MASTER 2012.dwg SHEET � ENG ' �1 �i CERTIFICATE OF AUTHORIZATION: 27664 Q`,.•G�N S F••., '� S , : � •;F� ; WOODS CONSULTING • � �5g8 •;� - ,�,4 �o�Nn Ro� ,, s�� 22 FRENCHY'S � Np . DUNEDIN FL 34698 • PH. (727� 786-5747 `�, :Q FAX (727) 786-7479 L� :W � 1E �� = REVISIONS EXISTING CONDITIONS Q�� . ..� o .�,� � ,c ,,� O F��.•��,,� ��°��SS I O N P`�'��, ��i�t�t��`� , SCALE: 1" = 60' COMMERCIAL DOCK Application# (OFFICIAL USE ONLY) SEE SHEET 4 FOR � NEW COMMERCIAL DOCK: CROSS SECTION A-A' FIXED APPROACH (22 FT X 4 F�=88 SQ FT � 12.0-�-�� UPPER LANDING (8 FT X 8 F�=64 SQ FT ' q W � I � RAMP(32 FT X 5 FT)=160 SQ FT Z `� J � LOWER LANDING (8 FT X 8 F�=64 FT � � p I I� W FLOATING DOCKS: 'c� p � I I p J 2(254 FT X 12 FT=3,048 SQ FT)=6,096 SQ FT Z W 55.0 W �, 1 (79 FT X 12 F�=948 SQ FT W a I I� H TOTAL NEW COMMERCIAL DOCK AREA=7,420 SQ FT wal IWa I I p •DOCK PROJECT SHORELINE=100.0 LF I I a •SIDE SETBACKS=10.0 FT I I •DOCK WIDTH ALLOWED=75.0 FT .DOCK WIDTH PROPOSED=79.0 FT � ( •COMBINED SHORELINE 441,425,423&419 I I �ST SHORE='300.0 LF •MAX. DOCK LENGTH ALLOWED WITH VARIANCE USING COMBINED I I •SHORELINE=337.5 FT"WITH BOARDWALK INCENTIVE. I I •DOCK LENGTH PROPOSED=300.0 FT � � 254.0 ( �10.0 300.0 10.0� � � � � � � � � � � � i79A � . , I I 12�0 SEE SHEET 2B FOR � FIXED DOCK � � � BOARDWALK � ' ' APPROACH � DETAILS RAMP � ' A • � � � 441 425 423 L�� ,`,`�,�O�i i��S��,, 419 411 A Thu,10 May 2 �:l3�rQ,EVF�'�oCp� � Docks(513-11)\CAD\FRENCHYS MASTER 2012.dwg SHEET 2 R'S SEA ; � CERTIFICATE OF AUTHORIZATION: 27664 .• • „ = * �* : WOODS CONSULTING : � : 1714 COUNiY ROAD 1, SUITE 22 � �Q� DUNEDIN FL 34698 ; �-E :�, � PH. 7275 786-5747 F R E N C H Y'S : �,� FAX �727) 786-7479 . p:��• '' '� • •'••••' ,` REVISIONS PROPOSED DOCK � , • �Ec��,. '�� ,,,, SCALE: 1" = 60' COMMERCIAL DOCK Application# (OFFICIAL USE ONLY) � X 9 w� Z � �� i g � o I I°w z '� o �l �Z � wa� IE.W. � � o X � w a I i W O NEW BOARDWALK: 4 4 1 &4 2 5 E A S T S H O R E:5.0 F T O V E R W A T E R, 1 0.0 F T O V E R L A N D I I p�„ (TOTAL 1,500 SQ F� I � 423 EAST SHORE: 15.0 FT OVER WATER I I (TOTAL 1,638 SQ FT LESS PORTION OF EXISTING DOCK. I I 419 EAST SHORE: 15.0 FT OVER WATER (TOTAL 466 SQ F� I I TOTAL BOARDWALK AREA 3,604 SQ FT(APPROX.309 LINEAR F� � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � . . I I B� GATES � � � ' • • 309,p � LINEqR FEET . • B ' . � CONNECT TO 411 441 425 423 L�� EAST SHORE SEE SHEET 5 FOR 419 411 CROSS SECTION B-B' Thu,10 May 2`q1�- �53�AP•�hy's Motel Docks(513-11)\CAD\FRENCHYS MASTER 2012.dwg SHEET 2B .` �i CERTIFICATE OF AUTHORIZATION: 27664 :Q;� F•��: �: : o sse �� NOODS CONSULTING � l�; .' ,�• 1714 COUNi`( ROAD 1, SUfTE 22 � . ^:� � DUNEDIN FL 34698 =,�; �'u � PH. (727� 786-5747 F R E N C H Y'S �� • �¢` FAX (727 786-7479 � • r ;� . � '� :��`;; REVISIONS PROPOSED BOARDWALK .,. �. . � , �___, ��j,,`�• � �� i�ei�t��`�� SCALE: 1" = 60' COMMERCIAL DOCK Application# (OFFICIAL USE ONLY) 7� � I �B �) u a W �18 �1 Z � J� � iB �g s a � �I � W 14 1S � c�� Za I Z J �� s 15�re I.W- OI 18 I � � 14 �6 w a� ' � w a 13--w-13` _ ��p � O � v�--18 I I a ?��—,2 �'`� I I I " �, 'Z � � � —�—�� 1 I I �0 �� 11 � � � � �? � � 0� � � � � �i I I °1 i e ��o 8 7 9 e —�� O �S I � �o 3 8 'o � � ' .� 10 ) � � 0{ �4_ � � � �p �� e ' � • � �0 0\� 34 S e • m ? � �/e � �7 9 � 8 � \'� 4 8 �� ='� �� r � g . P_�._. � � SEAGRASS _____""''' � ;/ !�";/`' BEDS ° �' i %'�%.� �� :�,%:� 441 425 423 �---�. SEAGR� BEDS 419 411 Thu,10 M b��- : rrllp�\Frenchy's Motel Docks(513-11)\CAD�FRENCHYS MASTER 2012.dwg SHEET 3 �� 6 AL CERTIFICATE OF AUTHORIZATION: 27664 °�`'�'� � ��''�s�' WOODS CONSULTING FRENCHY'S ��`: 15586 :�� . . " 1714 COUNIY ROAD 1, SUITE 22 �`. *; •� = DUNEDIN FL 34898 PH. (727� 78fi-5747 _ * :�� FAX (727) 786-7479 WAT E R D E PT H S AT -�' _ � . : �poP.\2�`�: REVISIONS MEAN LOW WATER & '• �� '�� ,;�;,,;�;��'� BENTHIC CONDITIONS SCALE: 1" = 10' COMMERCIAL DOCK Application# (OFFICIAL USE ONLY) SEE SHEET 2 FOR CROSS SECTION A-A' LOCATION 5.0 I-- 42" RAILING �10.0 .�� MHW=+0.59FT !�__ _ ___________________ __________________ _ ________________ �___________ _____________�___________________________________ __ MLW=—128 F7 e! __ _ _____ _________ _________________ _ __________� __ __ _ __ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ __ _ _ _ _' � __ __ _ '_ __ w " .✓ � J U H Q � LANDWARD BOARDWALK ----- ----------------------------------------------------------------- - ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- - z z J J U U Q Q � � OUTERMOST TIE POLES TO BE WRAPPED WITH REFLECTIVE TAPE (SEE SHEET 12) ---- ------------------------------------------------------ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- - ------------------------------ W -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- — -- -- -- -- -- — - -- -- - -- -- - -- -- -- -- - -- -- - -- — - -- -- -- -- -- - -- -- --- z J _ U Q � Thu,�o May q1�;Mb!�d �/P��renchy's Motel Docks(513-11)\CAD\FRENCHYS MASTER 2012.dwg SHEET 4 �� CERTIFICATE OF AUTHORIZATION: 27664 �Q��G��.• SF�'•��: WOODS CONSULTING " �: 15586 :'T++ 1714 COUNiY ROAD �, su� zz � •� " DUNEDIN FL 34698 _ ,� :* � PH. (727� 786-5747 F R E N C H Y'S ,,, � � � FAX (727) 786-7479 ,� • � ; '•• � oF ::��,�; REVISIONS CROSS SECTION A - A' . �0?;G��'�•` I .;� ..... �A��EN�.•��. SCALE: Custom COMMERCIAL DOCK Application# (OFFICIAL USE ONLY) SEE SHEET 2 FOR CROSS SECTION B- B' LOCATION MATCH DECK ELEVATION OF BOARDWALK TO EXISTING DOCK ELEV=+4.10 FT ` . .b . *� MHW ELEV=+0.59 FT .�d � ° MLW ELEV=-1.28 FT 9 .D! . � :,. .D•, . . Thu, 10 May 2012-10:54am P:\Frenchy's Motel Docks(513-11)\CAD�FRENCHYS MASTER 2012.dwg SHEET rJ E � L CERTIFICATE OF AUTHORIZATION: 27664 ��` • � ��I .` ' ��E�NS'•F�L`� WOODS CONSULTING � � �'.�� 1714 COUNTY ROAD 1, SUfTE 22 DUNEDIN FL 34898 1 �*:' �5 8� ;�_ � PH. (727� 786-5747 F R E N C H Y S � :.k � FAX (727) 786-7479 � r : : �. E oF ;�: REVISIONS CROSS SECTION A - A' � . �� P :��,�� ,,, R y p�..G�,��. s, .. ..• � '�i,��N A�'E�.�� SCALE: NONE COMMERCIAL DOCK Application# (OFFICIAL USE ONLY) NOTE:COMPOSITE DECKING IS SPECIFIED. O.C.STRINGER SPACING TO BE VIA MANUFACTURES SPECIFICATIONS,NOT TO EXCEED 24"O.C. HANDRAI�STANCHIONS PLACED 5.0'O.C. 2"X 10"INTERMEDIATE STRINGER MAX.2.0' 2"X 6"HANDRAILS O.C.CCA OR ACQ.60 RET. DECKING 2"X 4" 42�� 2°x s° STANCHIONS COUNTERSINKALL BOLTS RAILING TO BE FASTENED TO STRINGERS ADJACENT TO BOAT SLIPS. o W/SHORT BOLT,AND FASTENED TO PILE 0 0 WITH LONGER BOLT WHEN AVAILABLE ALL BOLTING TO BE 5!8"S/S o ° � DOUBLE STRINGER 2"X 10" 0 0 22 DEG MIN #2 S4S CCA OR ACQ.60 RET. ° 45 DEG MAX 0 MINIMUM PILE BENT BRACING: ALL PILE BENTS TO BE o 0 CROSS BRACED WITH ° ° 2"X 10"#2 S4S CCA 2"X 10"#2 S4S CCA 2.5 RET. 2.5 RET.ONE EACH SIDE ONE SIDE ONLY 2"X 10"#2 S4S CCA 2.5 RET. ALL PILE CAPS&CROSS BRACING& BRACING TO BE DOUBLE BLOCKING BOLTED AS SPECIFIED NOTE: ALL CCA TREATED PILES TO BE VINYL WRAPPED FROM MUD(SILT)LINE TO 2.0' MIN 8"TIP PILING 2.5 C.C.A.RET. ABOVE THE MEAN HIGH WATER LINE(MHV1n SET BUTT DOWN,MIN 8.0'PENETRATION. WITH PRIME HIGH DENSITY POLYETHYLENE .030 THICK NOTE: DECK BOARDS TO BE TRIMMED BOTH SIDES. NOTE: ALL INTERMEDIATE STRINGERS TO BE LAP JOINTED AT BENTS 2.0'MIN. FIXED APPROACH AND BOARDWALK DETAILS Thu,10 May 2012-1 :�5�ppry o ei�f nchy's Motel Docks(513-11)\CAD\FRENCHYS MASTER 2012.dwg SHEET 6 E E S �i CERTIFICATE OF AUTHORIZATION: 27664 ��G�;''��NSF�'�S'�'� WOODS CONSULTING :Q• ,55es ��s 1714 COUNiY ROAD 1, s�� z2 FRENCHY'S � • ,� DUNEDIN FL 34698 = .�. � _ /�'k � PH. (727� 786-5747 � —v � � FAX (�2�) �as—�4�s = � �F :'�: REVISIONS FIXED APPROACH AND "O � �� P ' ��'� BOARDWALK DETAI LS R � � 1�.��,� �' • a �� i��ri�� SCALE: NONE COMMERCIAL DOCK Application# (OFFICIAL USE ONLY) It is the intent of the following construction details to be a reference guide for quality,structural and safety standards. All structures to meet local, and or state guidelines for aquatic and marine construction. GENERAL DOCK NOTES: 1. ALL DECKING TO BE TRIMMED ON BOTH SIDES. 2. ALL PILINGS TO BE SEATED WITH A FREE FALLING HAMMER IF WATER JETTING IS INSTALLATION METHOD. ALL PILES TO BE TRIMMED SAME HEIGHT. 3. PILING CENTER TO CENTER SPACING ON ALL FIXED DOCKS TO BE 10 FT NOMINAL AND SHALL NOT EXCEED 12 FT. 4. DOCK FRAMING AND DECKING TO BE CONSTRUCTED USING STAINLESS STEEL HARDWARE (APPROPRIATE HARDWARE FOR COMPOSITE DECKING AND HANDRAILS WHERE SPECIFIED). 5. WOOD DECK BOARD SPACING AT TIME OF INSTALLATION NOT TO EXCEED 1/8"TO ALLOW FOR CURING, COMPOSITE DECK SPACING NOT TO EXCEED 1/4". DECK SCREW PATTERN 6. ALL DOCK FRAMING OTHER THAN DECKING TO BE MINIMUM GRADE 2 LUMBER. ooue�esTR�r,�eRS STRENGERS TE 7. RASP OR FEATHER ALL SAWCUTS. 8. ALL CONSTRUCTION TO MEET OR EXCEED COUNTY REQUIREMENTS LISTED IN � • SECTIONS 166-(332, 333&334) OF THE PINELLAS COUNTY WATER& ° • NAVIGATION CONTROL AUTHORITY DOCK CODES. ° • 9. CCA WOOD NOT ACCEPTABLE FOR DECKING OR RAILING MATERIALS.WOOD ° ° TREATMENT,AS FOLLOWS,ARE ACCEPTABLE:ALKALINE COPPER • ° QUATERNARY(ACQ), IF ACQ TREATMENT IS UTILIZED,THEN THE WOOD ` NEEDS TO BE SEALED WITH AN ENGINEER-APPROVED SEALANT. oNescREwiN-roEncH 10. CENTER TO CENTER SPANS OF THE FIXED DOCK SUPPORT PILINGS SHALL NOT EXCEED 12 FEET. 11. 5/8" GALVANIZED FASTENERS ARE NOT TO BE USED IN WOOD WITH COPPER INTERMEDIATE STRINGER AZOLE TREATMENT. LAP JOINT 12.ALL TREATED TIMBER PILINGS TO BE WRAPPED FROM THE MUD(SILT) LINE TO �� (NTS) Ik�l 2.0'ABOVE THE MEAN HIGH WATER LINE (MHWL)WITH PRIME HIGH DENSITY POLYETHYLENE(30 MILS OR .030"THICK�. DOUBLE STRINGERSMIN. 4'OVERLAP INTERMEDIATE STRINGER MIN.2'OVERLAP �2'MAX.O.C. 10'NOMINAL SPACING� Thu, 10 May 2012-10:55am P:\Frenchy's Motel Docks(513-11)\CAD\FRENCHYS MASTER 2012.dwg SHEET 7 E C? ' CERTIFICATE OF AUTHORIZATION: 27664 �```�`P''� ��s'•��L�'� WOODS CONSULTING �,\G'•• � •�:�,�'� 1714 COUNTY ROAD t. SUITE 22 1 �Q 1 5 8 :%" DUNEDIN FL 34698 F R E N C H Y S „ • � PH. (7275 786-5747 � ��r � FAX (727) 786-7479 = I C/; .. . " FIXED APPROACH AND 6 ;Q.. I Qj ` REVISIONS .. .� � � BOARDWALK DETAI LS _ . . _ � P •;�,i . , s/�.. �� .,,�o N A��.�`� SCALE: NONE COMMERCIAL DOCK Application# (OFFICIAL USE ONLY) ,� SIDE MOUNTED � ,,, 'D' WHITE VINYL BUMPER i �LY FLOAT E-CHANNEL BOX FRAME 2 X 8 PT PINE WDOD FENDER ELEVATION VIEW OF ALUMINUM DECKED POLY FLOATING DOCK ISOMETRIC VIEW OF ALUMINUM DECKED P�LY FLDATING DOCK SCALE� NTS SCALE� NTS LENGTH 8 5/8' ALUMINUM DECKING CHANNEL (3/S' GAP SPACING CROSS MEMBER BETWEEN PLANKS) WIDTH A CHANNEL CROSS MEMBER TUBE STRINGER P�LY FLOAT � WIDTH ��$ ��N��E E-CHANNEL BOX FRAME SIDE M�UNTED SIDE M�UNTED A 'D' WHITE VINYL BUMPER 'D' WHITE VINYL BUMPER TUBE STRINGER POLY FLDAT SECURE WITH ALUMINUM SECTI�N A-A RO�FING NAILS SCALE� NTS PIAN VIEW OF ALUMINUM DEGKED POLY FL�ATING D�CK SCALE� NTS Thu, 10 May 2012-10:55 r��P:\Frenchy's Motel Docks(513-11)\CAD�FRENCHYS MASTER 2012.dwg SHEET $ E ¢ ' � CERTIFICATE OF AUTHORIZATION: 27664 �' �' ••. � �i �k �G .• C s':Fly�'. WOODS CONSULTING � �:• � � � 1714 COUNTY ROAD 1, SUIiE 22 y �. : N 55 6 •�i DUNEDIN FL 34698 F R E N C HYi V � � PH. (727� 786-5747 ..+ = I ; � FAX (727) 786-7479 ��D * ; �oF :Q� REVISIONS FLOATING DOCK . . . �, P '' DETAILS ., ,,p� p �, :��/�. � ......• G,\ ,�� .,�Nq��EN��.�` SCALE: NONE COMMERCIAL DOCK Application# (OFFICIAL USE ONLY) LENGTH E-CHANNEL BOX f'RAlff TREAD PLATE �PIPE RAILING ` A r�r.vr RIBBm HINGE ASSEMHLY WIDTH A TOP DECKING CW�NNEL RAIL POCKET 12'x 36'WEAR CROSS MEMBERS PLATE(2 RE�'D) AND STRINGERS PLAN VIEW OF DR2 TOP DEGKE�ALLININUN GANf.vAY SCALE�NTS ISOMETRIC VIEW OF➢R2 ii1P➢ECKEO ALUMINUM GANGWAY SCALE�NTS TOTAL WIDTH PIPE RAILING � RAB RAIL IPE RAILING RAIL P-6'� CLEAR WmTH 3'-6' 2'-10' �70E RAIL 1 7/8' Tpp DECKING 1'-9' MAX GAP TREA➢PLATE 7pE RAIL TOP DEpCING E-CHANNEL FRAHE ppn ppCKET BOX FRAME LENGTH 7 x T r VP 12'x 36'WEAR RIHBED HINGE ASSEMBLY PLATE(2 RE�'D) RAIL POCI�T CHANNEL CROSS NENBERS AN➢ STRINGERS PLAN VIEW OF DR2 TOP DECKED ALUHINUN GANGWAY SECTIDN A-A SCALEi NTS SCALEi NTS Thu,10 May 2012-10:56a �P�\d renchy's Motel Docks(513-11)\CAD�FRENCHYS MASTER 2012.dwg SHEET 9 EN 'S y�� CERTIFICATE OF AUTHORIZATION: 27664 � s �`��G?' ��• NS''� ��. WOODS CONSULTING � � : � �c•.�L ; �: o •.�: 1714 COUNTY ROAD 1, S�� 22 F RE N C HY'S $$86 :'�i DUNEDIN R 34698 .", * • �� PH. (727� 786-5747 � �,* � FAX (727) 786-7479 � . � . � " ' ' RAMP AND FLOATING � ' y, �OF ::�Q: REVISIONS r v i � P � �.�' DOCK DETAI LS , - • , R ►o..•• ��. ��NA L EN��. ��r��n�� SCALE: NONE COMMERCIAL DOCK Application# (OFFICIAL USE ONLY) NOTE: ALL CCA TREATED PILES TO BE VINYL WRAPPED FROM MUD(SILT) LINE TO 2.0'ABOVE THE MEAN HIGH WATER LINE (MHV1n WITH PRIME HIGH DENSITY POLYETHYLENE 30 MILS OR .030"THICK NOTE: TOP ELEVATION CANNOT BE GREATER PLASTIC CAPS ON ALL THAN 10'ABOVE MEAN EXPOSED PILE TIPS, FASTEN WITH HIGH WATER S.S. NAILS (TYP.), CAPS SHOULD ELEVATION BE NO MORE THAN 1/4" LARGER THAN TRIMMED PILE DIMENSION. � 2.0 FT 0 ° MHW LINE of0 MIN 8"TIP PILING 2.5 C.C.A. RET. a SET BUTT DOWN, MIN 8.0' PENETRATION. ° VINYL WRAPPING � FROM MUD LINE o TO 2.0'ABOVE MHW 0 0 MUD LINE (Bottom) Thu,10 May 2012-10:56am P:\Frenchy's Motel Docks(513-11)\CAD�FRENCHYS MASTER 2012.dwg SHEET 10 ENGI L '��, CERTIFICATE OF AUTHORIZATION: 27664 �� p. ,,... . / �s ..��G� N'' �F�P, WOODS CONSULTING � ` s��'. �i 1774 COUNTY ROAD 1, SUITE 22 � p ; � DUNEDIN FL 34698 ; : 15586 •� , PH. (7275 786-5747 F R E N C H Y'S � �:� FAX (727) 786-7479 '-0 � yr � :7�' ��. �� oF ;w� REVISIONS PILING WRAP DETAILS . ., •A•�0 p:�`�,�,. '�:'pN E�.1 .�� A i�� SCALE: 1" = 80' COMMERCIAL DOCK Application# (OFFICIAL USE ONLY) � WATER LEVEL s a CONNECTING RODS Z � FLOAT e e � � � � � • LAMINATED , VINYL-POLYESTER SEA FLOOR �12"MIN FABRIC CHAIN WEIGHTED TYPICAL FLOATING TURBIDITY CURTAINS (DESIGN BY AER-FLO INC.) NTS FLOATING TURBIDITY CURTAINS (USE SMALLEST AREA PRACTICABLE) � . � � 441 425 423 �-� 419 411 409 405 EAST SHORE EAST SHORE Thu,10 May 2012-10:56am P:\Frenchy's Motel Docks(513-11)\CAD\FRENCHYS MASTER 2012.dwg SHEET 11 ENGI t� CERTIFICATE OF AUTHORIZATION: 27664 �`��.t•P�'' � EN � ��'� WOODS CONSULTING .` F�'•.cS' ; ��C.�; �.. rn4 courm Rono �, surr� 22 DUNEDIN FL 34698 :Q:• o , 58 � o PH. (7275 786-5747 FRENCHY'S _ * • I :* � FAX (727) 786-7479 _ . : �F :�,: REVISIONS • • TURBIDITY DETAILS �� ,. o' , *�'� �.�..`°•P c��' ; ��S��NAL�?`��` �� SCALE: NONE COMMERCIAL DOCK Application# (OFFICIAL USE ONLY) All pilings identified shall be painted with a durable white coating on the upper four (4) feet °> e thereof and wrapped with white reflective tape of �o a at least two (2) inches in width and one foot from �e the top so that the same shall be visible for three °e hundred sixty (360) degrees. °� 0 0 MHW LINE WHITE COATING FOR TOP 4 FT AND REFLECTIVE TAPE 1 FT FROM THE TOP PILING MUD LINE NOT TO SCALE �BOttOt11� OUTERMOST TIE POLES TO BE WRAPPED WITH REFLECTIVE TAPE Thu,10 May 2012-10:57�`�R:�FrBncpy's Motel Docks(513-11)\CAD�FRENCHYS MASTER 2012.dwg SHEET 12 ENC� ' °'�, CERTIFICATE OF AUTHORIZATION: 27664 . ��G�,.��G • •S '•.,,�'�% WOODS CONSULTING ;�:• 55 6 ..* 1714 COUNIY ROAD 1. s�� 22 FRENCHY'S = *� . / PH.N 72�75 86 5747 -��Y� FAX �727) 786-7479 � • REFLECTIVE TAPE r • .•�� REVISIONS r ♦ � -,°, ��' '� �jl �P•�`��' DETAILS � � �C�N AL�C•`� ��r,�� SCALE: 1" = 60' COMMERCIAL DOCK Application# (OFFICIAL USE ONLY) � Y 9 1 � 1 . 1 : I . � � ! F � � "BE A BETTER BOATER"- REPLACES MANATEE BASICS SIGN CAUTION SEAGRASS CAUTION . � ' MANATEES , LANDWARD FACING 'BE A BETTER I � � BOATER SIGN" ' 441 425 423 �---� Thu,10 May 2012-1 :�7�j�f'��renchy's Motel Docks(513-11)\CAD\FRENCHYS MASTER 2012.dwg SHEET 13 �E CERTIFICATE OF AUTHORIZATION: 27664 :,�G�'��•CE .•••F��'�, r � � WOODS CONSULTING . �Q';' N �:�,,�� 4 cournr Rono �, su� zs � 5 ;� w: DUNEDIN FL 34698 � �'; • • PH. (727� 786-5747 � - :* � FAX (727) 786-7479 F R E N C H Y S =�: � w • ; � �T o j:�,; REVISIONS S I G NAG E . �,. .,�'�s, • ,�• ��\�,�. I�� • � •E�`�� i��n�� _ __ _ _ _ _ _____ SCALE: 1" = 60' COMMERCIAL DOCK Application# (OFFICIAL USE ONLY) � I � LEGEND , �` „ I I Z � QFIRE HOSE STATION 4 0 I I� �� I� I EX FIBERGLASSCABINET BYOTHIERS � I .I'�..�. .�I I ( ) I-� � :I I - FIRE MA�N - POTABLE WATER Q I �� : 'I I HDPE HIGH DENSITY POLYETHYLENE (HEAT FUMEDj PER ASTM F-714 100.0 TYPICAL I (' ( I FDC FIREDEPARTMENTCONNECTION I I�.:::� ��I I F I � I I 6 TOTAL � I`' I � I I � 70.0 TYPICAL � I I � EX I I EX I ( � 8 TOTAL � � � � �' � 22'FIRE HOSE CONNECTION I �' I (WET STANDPIPE) � ,; I i � � I UTILITY CHANNEL THROUGH FLOATING I i i I DOCKS SHALL BE I ( EQUIPPED WITH 2" , _ � � �_`�� ` � HDPE (POTABLE) ' I I WATER LINES FOR • , , I I FUTURE HOSE BIB I CONNECTIONS • 3"FIRE LINE , DR9(200 PSI) UNDER GROUND MIN.30"BURIAL � FDC • � � 441 425 423 �-—�.. � � Q 419 � a ¢ a Thu,10 May 2012-10:57a�q11�� c �l�tel Docks(513-11)\CAD\FRENCHYS MASTER 2012.dwg SHEET 14 ENGI ,�S , �i, CERTIFICATE OF AUTHORIZATION: 27664 � �G�' .• 5��'��' �IVOODS CONSULTING . � 1 588 � .. • —»�a couNN Rono �, sur� 22 � *� � " DUNEDIN FL 34698 - . : - PH. (727� 786-5747 F R E N C H Y'S � � • �`. FAX (727) 786-7479 .. : � �' E ��: • ;o . P :� ,: REVISIONS FIRE AND WATER PLANS ��, �, . S�0, A �,C��,�,• �`�ir�n�� SCALE: NONE COMMERCIAL DOCK Application# (OFFICIAL USE ONLY) 2-1/2"HOSE VALVE� 6"DIA STAINLESS I STEELTUBE 2"SDR II HDPE I I PIPE WALER(TYP.)� ^ �LD TO STAINLESS FLOATING DOCK � STEEL PLATE STAINLESS STREEL STRUT(2)REQUIRED 3"SDR II HDPE PIPE(FIRE)W/14 O G/A/S/S/STRAP&5l16"X2"S.S. LAG SCREWS 4'O.C. WATER LINE DISTANCE VARIES DEPENDING ON WHALER WIDTH AND DOCK FREEBOARD SINGLE CANTILEVER(CL) FLOATING DOCK HOSE VALVE 2-1/2"FIRE DEPARTMENT (NTS) CONNECTION 0 6"WHITE SCHD 40 PVC PIPE � FILL WITH CONCRETE 3"BRASS ADAPTER SIGN TO READ"DRY FIRE STANDPIPE DOCKS" GRADELEVEL ' CONCRETE :!' � '' . �,�•: 4'• •.�� .�+,; �4 .4 3"SDR II HDPE PIPE 36"MIN BURIAL FIRE DEPT CONNECTION (NTS) Thu,10 May 2012-10:57 r��R:�f�r chy's Motel Docks(513-11)\CAD\FRENCHYS MASTER 2012.dwg SHEET 15 EN iV ' �i CERTIFICATE OF AUTHORIZATION: 27664 �� `I`.•'�� IN� • �� .��V: � F'•��'�� WOODS CONSULTING �Q�� 5 86 % �� 1714 COUNTY ROAD 1. SUITE 22 � :.� � DUNEDIN FL 34698 _ �: � • PH. (727 786-5747 F RE N C HY'S � " FAX (727� 786-7479 . � "-� � � � � •�� r : .. Q :�,� REVISIONS FI RE DETAI LS ,� • I Y P , '<!/�. �t�` � ��0 ��,�,. � .•• ��O�qi„E��`� SCALE: NONE COMMERCIAL DOCK Application# (OFFICIAL USE ONLY) STAINLESS STEEL 3-1/2"X 3-1/2"X 1/4" STAINLESSSTEELTHROUG OLT 3/8"X 3-1/2"HEX CAP i AND FLAT WASHER � 316 STAINLESS S EEL BARB i i ADAPTER C � TRIPLE BAND WITH 316 i STAINLESS STEEL BANDING i i i i i i i STAINLESS STEEL � ADAPTER i I 1-1/2"WIFE 14 GA 316 STAINLESS 316SS STRAP STEEL GROVED COUPLING TYPICAL RAMP ANCHOR DETAIL (NTS) G '`�Y RAMP GANGWAY�MP FLOATING DOCK ____ WATERLINE__ 3"DIA TEXCEL FLO-3 HD-FIRE OR E�UIVALENT STAINLESS STEEL WITH S.S.ADAPTERS HANGER(TYP.) WITH 4"DISCHARGE HOSE FOR CHAFE ATTACH WITH 1/4" PROTECTION-TEX-POLYB-40TYPICAL(2) STAINLESSBOLTAS ENDS NEEDED FLEX DETAIL (NTS) Thu,10 May 2012-10:58 � P:\Frenchy's Motel Docks(513-11)\CAD\FRENCHYS MASTER 2012.dwg SHEET 16 E i3 CERTIFICATE OF AUTHORIZATION: 27664 i ��,P.••''�ENSF•.�'L�,:,� WOODS CONSULTING ` � � �'._/_i 1714 COUMY ROAD 1, SUfTE 22 � ��' S586 ;� � DUNEDIN FL 34698 FRENCHY S • •* + PH. (7275 786-5747 � _ .k: � � s FAX (727) 786-7479 ��Q� : �; � ;�; REVISIONS FI RE DETAI LS , ,. '• OP•��2: �'� .0�� . • �� .,��ONA��` SCALE: 1" = 60' COMMERCIAL DOCK Application# (OFFICIAL USE ONLY) � � I � 4 4 � '' � Z `� 4 R I ( I I � I I ' =I I � I I � UTILITY CONDUIT FOR FUTURE ELECTRIC (IF DESIRED) � � � � I � ,;� I � � � � � ( ;� � � � � � � � � � � �. � � � ( � � � ( � � � ` ( � � � , I I � � � � � � � � � � ` � � � � ( � � � ' � � � ( � � . , � � ' � � ' • • � � � � � . � 441 425 423 L�� 419 � a ¢ a Thu, 10 May 2012-10:58am P:\Frenchy's Motel Docks(513-11)\CAD\FRENCHYS MASTER 2012.dwg SHEET 17 ENGIN �'n�Si� L CERTIFICATE OF AUTHORIZATION: 27664 �.O AS1� a�'a, �`��Q' '�NS�'��S°``d wOODS CONSULTING �� Q� F � •. �;. 1714 COUNTY ROAD 1, SUIiE 22 � � 6 •�/ f' DUNEDIN FL 34698 . �55g :* � PH. (7275 786-5747 F R E N C H Y'S � . � FAX (727) 786-7479 .� • � : ; : Q ( oF .:�; REVISIONS ELECTRICAL : % � �Q;•�_. . � � �R\�,�� i�i;;S�p N p,e,`�� t�� . .. _ � .�: � !�=•i � _. .., - � ... ",,� - � _ : - ��'�� .a �., � �� - _ -�,, � \ � . , �� x l �_ � , - _ _ _ �� -- , .�'`�' ��r��_ . r _.. ( . y - - . _, � _'. .. �; � _ . � _ �� ,�, r ` � , . � I _ _li � ` �-�� ' _ � """'...�..��,.,�°�----- � � �:. ••► _�,:,,�.,,,�� - �� ._ ,�«?�° ?t �_-. — F � . �..�--�..e__._. _.L ,.., �. —.__ .. ,._< , . - — !� �� . � _ � t � , 1 �=�, �-rt �,,� � � ��> , f . �'� . _ �� /� �. �. .. L�'"��' -. , -.,,� �� ,� , ,_ �� ..�: �'��.�� ----�—�"�'�� . � r � a.�. � i � 1��,`-- °==u--�.ti . - .: . ��;; ,=�;� ,. � � �, ---�-- ��'' r .- x.��;" _ z.. ,� �. — ��.. •��*e�+�..� - '"�"�' � � �►� i `� , .}I..� �s �,�� , I � _� ��' !„ � ' `�� -�- ; � ,�., : r�r rr...r,�� _ ,��; --� '.`.� — ._,z.._... � � � � � � • _._ � � � �� ,,,,,.. �.":.--- � �=r. ___ v_ -�.) - '1\ � �' ,�� Y �.-�,�' ,. � �.,�_ y , ._ 1 , :�--1 �„i f �' ' . � �'' e ,�,'.� � #.'�' �•A ' �.�.� =�� `' F _. : . � � i i� �- � 1 �.� .� ��i== i1�� s � (� ^"_� 1~ � � � �� ^ ��i' �';_ � � �.,,,,.� _._ � _ ! T , ' '� . . � _ � - , . � '.,�._ •��'=� :��:�i► � ..,�� _� .� : �� e j f� 1�� -�-..� ��:r�.. ,..��... � „ "°' =��:r �q-� .... ( ..._� ,,� :. z , a '•'�"S � ; � . � �• s �` � �^v,,,.i��I��"��'�rs � '►• � � f° s �1 # '` � � t �', ;`.. «�.. ' ,' , ►� , �r �_ �t� � . ` -. � ��"'� �'��5..�.. ��`� —'_ — -- _ _ � g ��. N41�� i ' v _ . _ � ',. r H —�`-�, ��—�r`---�_ ,.�-&� � �; I � � ; ��1 r � 4�,:� � � — � � � � _. , _ ---=-�-'�I ;--.--�,�i ��.� li►: , �,r� -- N��^.G.�n �.��, --_ �'�►:, , , � , :. � I � .. � ( 1 ' �q � - . .. . � . . - . �.� -- � � . �� _ _ . ;�. \ 4� �� r�� ' .� ,�� c�, � - rY, ` t �� F ' ��• ��„� - � � e , ., I I __ ` . '� �:,' .�� r �� -�-� `�� ..�'�� a�� ' . l�;. 4.1��sA , . � .�.,,�. �- ! - � � - � ,� '�'�� - � . _ _ � � � . � , � y�t,�— �� {�R�� ., ��►��\1# c. � � �� '�1 � ,. e� � � � �It -° ;��a='�_ ' �� - � _ .� I ._ . _ _ _ , , .�. .,, � ..�,.. i�� . -�, � � w - ��:. �- - ti ��- �� — . . i � _ � _ `� r �_ ��'�� ,....,� � � � �. - . . � � �. �