FLD2012-02005; 454 MANDALAY AVE; UNION BURGER 1
�
454 MANDALAY AVE
Date Received: 2/1/2012 11 :23:04 AM
Union Burger
ZONING DISTRICT: Tourist
LAND USE: Resort Facilities High (30
du/acre)
ATLAS PAGE: 267A
PLANNER OF RECORD: ESC
PLANNER: Ellen Crandall, Planner II
4
CDB Meeting Date: Anril 17, 2012
Case Number: FLD2012-02005
Agenda Item: E. 4.
Owner/Applicant: Devcor N.Y. Develo�ments, Inc.
Representative: The Sustainability Group, LLC
Address: 454 Mandalav Avenue
CITY OF CLEARWATER
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
STAFF REPORT
GENERAL INFORMATION:
REQUEST: Flexible Development approval to permit 4,296 square feet of
restaurant in the Tourist (T) District with a lot area of 5,012 square feet,
a lot width of 50 feet, front (east) setbacks of 2.6 feet (to building) and
zero feet to pavement, a side (south) setback of zero feet (to building), a
side (north) setback of zero feet (to building), a rear (west) setback of
1.16 feet (to building), a building height of 18.6 feet (to top of flat
roo�, and zero off-street parking spaces as a Comprehensive Infill
Redevelopment Project under the provisions of Community
Development Code Sections 2-801.1 and 2-803.0
ZONING DISTRICT: Tourist(T)
FUTURE LAND USE
PLAN CATEGORY: Resort Facilities High (RFH)
BEACH BY DESIGN
CHARACTER
DISTRICT: Destination Resort District
PROPERTY USE: Current: Nightclub
Proposed: Restaurant
EXISTING North: Tourist(T) District
SURROUNDING Retail Sales and Service
ZONING AND USES: South: Tourist(T)District
Retail Sales and Service
East: Tourist(T)District
Restaurant
West: Tourist(T)District
Attached dwellings
ANALYSIS:
Site Location and Existing Conditions:
The 0.11 acres subject property is located on the west side of Mandalay Avenue roughly 150 feet
north of Papaya Street. It is within the Destination Resort District of Beach by Design. The site,
until recently, has been a nightclub. The existing building is 4,316 square feet no off-street
parking is provided.
Community Development Board—April 17,2012
FLD2012-02005—Page 1 of 8
4
The surrounding neighborhood is a tourist area comprised of retail sales and service, restaurant,
and attached dwellings (condos). The surrounding uses along Mandalay Avenue are restaurant
and retail sales and service while the attached dwellings (condos) are to the west of Mandalay
Avenue mostly fronting on side streets and facing the Gulf of Mexico. City parking lot #36 is
less than 300 feet to the north of the subject parcel.
Development Proposal:
The proposal is to convert the existing nightclub into a restaurant with a sidewalk cafe. The
proposed restaurant will be a combination of Union Burger and Coffee Culture with two distinct
fa�ade elements; however there will be one common entrance and the interior will be open as
one tenant space. The existing 4,316 square foot of building space will be reduced to 4,296
square feet. The site currently has zero pazking spaces and cannot accommodate any new
parking spaces.
The proposal includes front, side and rear setback flexibility to recognize the location of the
existing building at less than the required setbacks. The application includes the reduction from
five to zero feet of the required foundation landscape area along the majority of Mandalay;
where no presently exists. However they will provide two new foundation planting areas, one to
the north of the building and one to the very south of the building.
The proposal improves the architectural style to a revitalized tropical architecture, which is
appropriate and aesthetically pleasing for this beachfront property and complements the tropical
vernacular envisioned in Beach by Design. The existing building fa�ade will be completely
renovated with a brand new building fa�ade. The pedestrian level will be enhanced by providing
canopies, operable storefront windows, and outdoor dining. Visual interest will be achieved
through building materials with different textures, such as a water table with a smooth stone
finish and pilasters with a rock face finish. The building will have step backs in both the vertical
and horizontal planes, as well as pilasters, open penetrations to the courtyard, stepped parapet
heights, sconces, molded copings, and canopies. In addition to the architectural improvements
there will be in-ground as well as above ground planters with small ornamental palms. The
proposed building elevations will be white, light tan, light brown and light pastel colors, which
are sensitive to the Florida vernacular for the beach. The proposal meets the tropical vernacular
architecture guidelines through the use of large expanses of windows, covered and uncovered
outdoor seating, overhangs providing patrons protection from the sun, awnings providing the
windows screening from the sun and finish treatments commonly found in tropical vernacular
architecture such as stone and corrugated metal.
The location of the existing building occupies the majority of the property frontage on Mandalay
Avenue the building does not allow for any vehicular access from Mandalay Avenue. As such
this site does not include any on-site parking. The proposal includes a reduction to the required
parking for a restaurant from 64 spaces (based on 15 spaces per 1,000 square feet)to zero spaces.
The applicant has submitted a Parking Demand Study that analyzed the available parking within
1,000 feet of the subject property, north of the roundabout.
The development proposal's compliance with the various development standards of the
Community Development Code (CDC) is discussed below.
Floor Area Ratio (FAR): Pursuant to the Countywide Plan Rules and CDC Section 2-801.1, the
maximum floor area ratio for properties with a Future Land Use designation of Resort Facilities
Community Development Board—April 17,2012
FLD2012-02005—Page 2 of 8
High (RFH) is 1.0. The proposed one-story building footprint produces a floor area ratio of 0.85,
which is consistent with Code provisions.
Im�ervious Surface Ratio (ISRI: Pursuant to the Countywide Plan Rules and CDC Section 2-
801.1, the maximum allowable I.S.R. for properties with a Future Land Use designation of RFH
is 0.95. The existing ISR is 0.974 and, after construction of the proposed improvements,the ISR
will be reduced by 9.6 square feet, which while still resulting in a nonconforming, will at least
reduce the existing nonconformity.
Minimum Lot Area and Width: Pursuant to CDC Table 2-803, there is no minimum lot area or
width requirement for Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Projects. The subject property has a
lot area 5,012 square feet and lot width along Mandalay Avenue of 50 feet.
Minimum Setbacks: Pursuant to CDC Table 2-803,there is no minimum setback requirement for
Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Projects. The development proposal includes a front (east)
setback of 2.6 feet (to building) and zero feet to pavement, a side (south) setback of zero feet (to
building), a side (north) setback of zero feet (to building), a rear (west) setback of 1.16 feet (to
building). All of these setbacks are to existing improvements that cannot be altered without
substantial ramifications to the functionality of the property. As such, and as the building
placement is typical of other buildings in the area, staff supports the requested setback flexibility.
Maximum Buildin� Hei� Pursuant to CDC Table 2-803, there is no maximum allowable
height for Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Projects. The proposed building is 22 feet (to
top of parapet).
Minimum Off-Street Parkin�: Pursuant to CDC Table 2-803, the minimum off-street parking
requirements for Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Projects shall be as determined by the
Community Development Coordinator based on the specific use and/or ITE Manual standards.
As stated previously, due to the location of the proposed building and the size and configuration
of the subject property, only limited parking is available. The proposal includes a reduction to
the required parking for restaurant from 64 spaces (based on 15 spaces per 1,000 square feet), to
zero spaces. The applicant submitted a Parking Demand Study that analyzed the available
parking within 1,000 feet of the subject property. The study found, in accordance with a
methodology established with the City of Clearwater staff, that there are a total 171 available
parking spaces within 1,000 feet including City lot #34, 35, and 43. Therefore, the study finds
and staff supports the finding that adequate parking is available within reasonable walking
distance of the project. The proposed use will not be a destination use and will focus on serving
patrons already on the beach for other attractions.
Mechanical Equipment: Pursuant to CDC Section 3-903.H.1, mechanical equipment shall be
screened from any public right-of-way and adjacent properties. The screening of inechanical
equipment will be addressed at time of permitting.
Sight Visibilit�an�les: Pursuant to CDC Section 3-904.A, to minimize hazards at street or
driveway intersections, no structures or landscaping may be installed which will obstruct views
at a level between 30 inches above grade and eight feet above grade within 20-foot sight
visibility triangles. The proposal has been reviewed by the City's Traffic Engineering
Department and been found to be acceptable.
Community Development Board—April 17,2012
FLD2012-02005—Page 3 of 8
Utilities: Pursuant to CDC Section 3-912, for development that does not involve a subdivision,
all utilities, including individual distribution lines, must be installed underground unless such
undergrounding is not practicable. The electric and communication lines are to remain as-is. If
located exterior to the building, to ensure views are minimized, this electrical equipment should
be painted the same color as the building. The location and potential views of such electrical
equipment will be addressed at the building permit stage.
Landscapin�: Pursuant to CDC Section 3-1202.D, there are no perimeter buffers required in the
T District; and pursuant to Section 3-1202.E, as the proposed vehicular use area is less than
4,000 square feet, no interior landscaping is required. Foundation plantings are not requested as
the footprint of the proposed building matches the existing along Mandalay Avenue maintaining
a cohesive development pattern along the property line not allowing appropriate area for full
foundation plantings, however the proposal includes the addition of two small planting areas to
the north and south of the property, along Mandalay Avenue.
Solid Waste: The proposal will utilize one roll out dumpster for trash removal. The dumpster
will be located on the south side of the building. Three sides of the dumpster enclosure will be
existing walls of the open air courtyard and the gate to screen the dumpster will be a 6 foot high
vinyl fence. On trash days, the dumpster will be rolled out by Solid Waste Department's trash
pick-up. The proposal has been found to be acceptable by the City's Solid Waste Department.
Si�na�e: No freestanding or attached signage is proposed at this time. Due to site constraints
freestanding signage is not possible; however any freestanding signage in the T District is
restricted to a maximum height of four feet, or six feet through a Comprehensive Sign Program.
Any proposed attached signage not meeting minimum Code requirements must be approved
through a Comprehensive Sign Program.
Additional Beach b� Desi n Guidelines: Section C.l requires buildings with a footprint of
greater than 5,000 square feet to be constructed so that no more than two of the three building
dimensions in the vertical or horizontal planes are equal in length. As the proposed building
footprint is approximately 4,296 square feet this requirement does not need to be met.
Section C.2 requires no plane or elevation to continue uninterrupted for greater than 100 feet
without an offset of more than five feet. As all facades of the building are less than 100 feet in
length,this requirement does not need to be met.
Section C.3 requires at least 60 percent of any elevation to be covered with windows or
architectural decoration. The elevation along Mandalay Avenue contains windows, stone
columns, and overhangs along the entire building elevations. On the north and west elevations
will abut directly to the adjacent building or where the visibility of the elevations is limited or
hindered, less architectural decoration is practical and provided.
Section C.4 requires that no more than 60 percent of the theoretical ma�imum building envelope
located above 45 feet be occupied by a building. As the maximum height of the development
proposal is 22 feet to top of parapet, this guideline is not applicable.
Code Enforcement Analysis: There are no outstanding Code Enforcement issues associated
with the subject property.
Community Development Board—April 17,2012
FLD2012-02005—Page 4 of 8
COMPLIANCE WITH STANDARDS AND CRITERIA: The following table depicts the
consistency of the development proposal with the standards as per CDC Section 2-801.1 and
Tables 2-802 and 2-803:
Standard Proposed Consistent Inconsistent
Floor Area Ratio 1.0 4,296 square feet(0.85) X
Impervious Surface Ratio 0.95 0.974 X'
Minimum Lot Area N/A 5,012 sq.ft. X
Minimum Lot Width N/A 50 feet X
Minimum Setbacks Front: N/A East: 2.6 feet(to building) X
Zero feet(to sidewalk)
Side: N�A South: Zero feet(to building) X
North: Zero feet(to building) X
Rear: N�A West: 1.6 feet(to building) X
Zero feet(to pavement)
Maximum Height N/A 14 feet(to flat roo fl X
Minimum Off-Street Parking N/A zero parking spaces X'
� See analysis in Stafj'Report
Community Development Board—April 17,2012
FLD2012-02005—Page 5 of 8
COMPLIANCE WITH FLEXIBILITY CRITERIA: The follo�ing table depicts the
consistency of the development proposal with the Flexibility criteria as per CDC Section 2-803.0
(Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project):
Consistent Inconsistent
1. The development or redevelopment is otherwise impractical without deviations from X
the use and/or development standazds set forth in this zoning district.
2. The development or redevelopment will be consistent with the goals and policies of X
the Comprehensive Plan, as well as with the general purpose, intent and basic
planning objectives of this Code, and with the intent and purpose of this zoning
district.
3. The development or redevelopment will not impede the normal and orderly X
development and improvement of surrounding properties.
4. Adjoining properties will not suffer substantiai detriment as a result of the proposed X
development.
5. The proposed use shall otherwise be permitted by the underlying future land use X
category, be compatible with adjacent land uses, will not substantially alter the
essential use characteristics of the neighborhood;and shall demonstrate compliance
with one or more of the following objectives:
a. 1fie proposed use is permitted in this zoning district as a minimum standard,
flexible standazd or flexible development use;
b. The proposed use would be a significant economic contributor to the City's
economic base by diversifying the local economy or by creating jobs;
c. The development proposal accommodates the expansion or redevelopment
of an existing economic contributor;
d. The proposed use provides for the provision of affordable housing;
e. The proposed use provides for development or redevelopment in an area
that is characterized by other similar development and where a land use plan
amendment and rezoning would result in a spot land use or zoning
designation;or
a. The proposed use provides for the development of a new and/or preservation of a
working waterfront use.
6. Flexibility with regard to use, lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street X
parking are justified based on demonsvated compliance with all of the following
design objectives:
a. The proposed development will not impede the normal and orderly
development and improvement of the surrounding properties for uses
permitted in this zoning district;
b. The proposed development complies with applicable design guidelines
adopted by the City;
c. The design, scale and intensity of the proposed development supports the
established or emerging chazacter of an area;
d. In order to form a cohesive, visually interesting and attractive appearance,
the proposed development incorporates a substantial number of the
following design elements:
❑ Changes in horizontal building planes;
❑ Use of architectural details such as columns, cornices, stringcourses,
pilasters,porticos,balconies,railings,awnings,etc.;
❑ Variety in materials,colors and textures;
O Distinctive fenestration patterns;
O Building step backs;and
❑ Distinctive roofs forms.
e. The proposed development provides for appropriate buffers, enhanced landscape
desi n and a ro riate distances between buildin s.
Community Development Board—April 17,2012
FLD2012-02005—Page 6 of 8
COMPLIANCE WITH GENERAL STANDARDS FOR LEVEL TWO APPROVALS: The
following table depicts the consistency of the development proposal with the General Standards
for Level Two Approvals as per CDC Section 3-914.A:
Consistent Inconsistent
1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, X
coverage,density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located.
2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage development and use of X
adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof.
3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons X
residing or working in the neighborhood.
4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. X
5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the X
immediate vicinity.
6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including X
visual,acoustic and olfacto and hours of o eration im acts on ad'acent ro erties.
SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION:
The Development Review Committee (DRC) reviewed the application and supporting materials
at its meeting of March 1, 2012, and deemed the development proposal to be legally sufficient to
move forward to the Community Development Board (CDB), based upon the following:
Findin�s of Fact. The Planning and Development Department, having reviewed all evidence
submitted by the applicant and requirements of the Community Development Code, finds that
there is substantial competent evidence to support the following findings of fact:
1. That the 0.11-acre subject property is located on the west side of Mandalay Avenue roughly
150 feet north of Papaya Street;
2. That the subject property is located in the Tourist (T) District and the Resort Facilities High
(RFH) future land use plan category;
3. That the subject property is located within the Destination Resort District of Beach by Design
and is subject to all applicable requirements set forth therein;
4. That the building is presently vacant but had been previously operated with a nightclub use;
5. That the proposal includes the conversion of 4,296 square feet of floor area from nightclub to
restaurant use;
6. That the proposal includes a front (east) setback of 2.6 feet (to building) and zero feet (to
pavement), a side (south) setback of zero feet(to building), a side (north) setback of zero feet
(to building), a rear(west) setback of 1.16 feet(to building) and zero feet(to pavement);
7. That the proposal includes large expanses of windows, covered and uncovered outdoor
seating, overhangs, awnings, and finish treatments such as stone and corrugated metal; and
8. That there is no active Code Enforcement case for the subject property.
Conclusions of Law. The Planning and Development Department, having made the above
findings of fact,reaches the following conclusions of law:
1. That the development proposal is consistent with the Standards as per Community
Development Code Tables 2-801.1, and 2-803;
2. That the development proposal is consistent with the Flexibility criteria as per Community
Development Code Section 2-803.C;
Community Development Board—April 17,2012
FLD2012-02005—Page 7 of 8
3. That the development proposal is consistent with the General Standards for Level Two
Approvals as per Community Development Code Section 3-914.A; and
4. That the development proposal is consistent with the applicable Design Guidelines of Beach
by Design.
Based upon the above, the Planning and Development Department recommends APPROVAL of
the Flexible Development application to permit 4,296 square feet of restaurant in the Tourist (T)
District with a lot area of 5,012 square feet, a lot width of 50 feet, front (east) setbacks of 2.6 feet
(to building) and zero feet to pavement, a side (south) setback of zero feet (to building), a side
(north) setback of zero feet (to building), a rear (west) setback of 1.16 feet (to building), a
building height of 18.6 feet (to top of flat roo fl, and zero off-street parking spaces as a
Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project under the provisions of Community Development
Code Sections 2-801.1 and 2-803.C., subject to the following conditions:
Conditions of Approval:
1. That a building permit be obtained for the building fa�ade and interior improvements;
2. That the building farade and landscaping improvements be completed prior to issuance of a
Business T�Receipt;
3. That a Business T�Receipt be obtained for the restaurant establishment;
4. That an Outdoor Cafe permit be obtained for the seating in the public right-of-way;
5. That the final design and color of the restaurant building be consistent with the elevations
approved by the CDB;
6. That any new or existing mechanical equipment be screened from public rights-of-way and
adjacent properties;
7. That the electrical equipment located on the outside of the building be painted the same color
as the building;
8. That there shall be no amplified music or microphone usage outside; and
9. That prior to the issuance of any building permits, the Fire Department may require the
provision of a Water Study performed by a Fire Protection Engineer in order to ensure that an
adequate water supply is available and to determine if any upgrades are required by the
developer due to the impact of the project. The water supply must be able to support the
needs of any required fire sprinkler, standpipe and/or fire pump. If a fire pump is required,
then the water supply must be able to supply 150%of its rated capacity.
Prepaxed by Planning and Development Department Staff:
Ellen Crandall, Planner II
ATTACHMENTS:Location Map;Aerial Map;Zoning Map;Existing Surrounding Uses Map;and Photographs
Community Development Board—April 17,2012
FLD2012-02005—Page 8 of 8
Ellen Crandall
100 South Myrtle Avenue
Clearwater,FL 33756
727-562-4836
ellen.crandall(a�mvclearwater.com
PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE
■ Planner II
City of Clearwater, Clearwater, Florida May 2010 to Present
Duties include performing the technical review and preparation of staff reports for various land
development applications, the organization of data and its display in order to track information and
provide status reports.
■ Planner I
City of Clearwater, Clearwater, Florida December 2009 to May 2010
Assist public customers at the Zoning Counter. Review Building Permits, Sign Permits,Business Tax
Receipts, and Landscape Plans as well as Comprehensive Sign Program Applications, and Flexible
Standard Developments. Regulate growth and development of the City in accordance with land
resource ordinances and regulations related to community development. Interdepartmental and
zoning assistance. Respond as a City representative to citizens, City officials, and businesses
concerning ordinances and regulations. Make recommendations and presentations at staff level at
various review committees,boards, and meetings.
■ Community Planner
Bradford County, Towanda, Pennsylvania January 2008 to May 2009
Coordinates with the 51 municipalities in Bradford County and assisted them in writing
Comprehensive Plans, developing ordinances, and general public and municipal education on zoning,
land use, and ordinances. I developed a comprehensive Zoning Lexicon that included zoning maps,
districts and definitions for all municipalities with zoning ordinances. Assisted in the County Parks
Plan and in developing a comprehensive Park's book listing all the parks in Bradford County. I
assisted mapping the natural gas wells as well as printing maps and parcel data for the gas companies.
■ Intern
Pennsylvania Geologic Survey, Middletown, Pennsylvania May 2006 to September 2006
Scanned geologic maps,updated documents and assisted in general office tasks.
EDUCATION
Bachelor of Science, -Major: Geography,-Minor: Art, -Certificate: Geographic Information S sv tem
SHIPPENSBURG UNIVERSITY, Shippensburg,Pennsylvania
ISA, International Society of Arboriculture, Certified Arborist
LEED Green Associate
,i;jr` �� �� � � �' �"` ��, w._..,._-.r-.
,� �..� ,�.
� ,, ,
�. .
r�+"�fM`� �4 ` � � . _
,
r,�'�: y �
��i
.,... „� ��, r „ � Y� ,
. r�� � ,� , �,��, . .
�f r�r „� � '� `�',��' ��:�»�
�Y "�`" ,,,�,� � <� ;�p
� �. ` ,�M► t�V�"y#�G ',('t' ' �
� ��4•i,�' �..�,� ' �. � �f�.� i
�� _. � ��'.. ��'� r . ..� . ,
l 1'�.tilk�, � . ><. :k'A
' ��:. ,p�pii4 °. : .
��t �i,�;
'� �t��
� ;�__���� � I
____'_ ��8�; �� '
� .! � `.� .` !� �
:. _.
.
� , .. :. �
�
� �,.�t.� � � �i ,i, � „ . � # � ; �� ,,l,� � s
� , �
� . , .: ,
.F . �, � ��
� � �w
,� ����
View of the north building fa�ade. View of the alley/outdoor seating area on the south
portion of the property.
, ::;� �'��! � -:� �`�`>.i�
�.; , � � �
,
.
.. r+� ;�� , ,
x �� ,� , , ,
�� � � � ' ��' `"
�.. „ �
.,
� _ti_�..� ., . w . n_� � � ,
�..
�_ � ,.r,,.�, �;
�� ,,�,�,��
••``µ'�`��� � � ! � �-
. ',,�
;.
�� R! ��.
� � t ��i �
, • ��'
�, �. � , � .,,,
` i
`� ' Y�. �. 4
� �
�i �
,.
�"ar.�,' ��',� x i�;�
1
� . .. .__. �'. .. �
View of the north side of the building and property View of the alley to the west of the property.
and the adjacent parking lot.
454 Mandalay Avenue
Case Number FLD2012-02005
Page 1 of 1
�� r� �� , iy'� ��} � �li� _ �_
`"� . ,. ' � F
� t1 � L��1�l�!��V�1���7 �' �
�� } +, "� �, f ,A � � 4.� z.
�� .r��l� y�y�j � .
{d 1� � � , • , *T " " ..
. °� _�� ,�o�`�' iMS�y�o4 i ��..y ���.. �* � b Y �.�� ' �1,u:,e;e�-F ,
'4 �: �' # I ,� • �
� "'� •' � r�
P � � AI'�+
�,vHr� �� , .y^ � 61Y �� r
vH '
� � +i �,
. ° �p i��� �: , „r .. . �,'�- .,.a...�.
� . .y. �. }t.. '"` --.�
# ""�'r�;�`:,4e�- �,. �'� �" ,� �w ''�
V . � � J
� ,� w
� � � � � �..i� ..� "�� ����ha _
;w ° / �
< ' 9 (
;� . , -�
�
__,
1�w. � 'l� '� � ' ,�'��1�`�� `''�.
�i � ` y'* iy 7 �
�� �4 +4
� � � '� - �R � , �� ��R _.
_ '*,�' � .� � � � ,/ � .�1\r �
� � �J � +w,�1� fi ry
. � ..� � i'�. w +�'`#�},�_, . .
� � ��J � < ' �^"o'� _r °' a� I � �`� .
�Y J � M "_ „
* qr -r � i� -� —'.�+—^-- s
�'' � � ' "�
'.s r �. �
�, �'�'' -r p►+/' � . �
x '' � #
,,� ;� � �� ��� � �,
� � '�. . I"j � 4� \ .
V
� } �r r+"'� . � � J���I��� �
�a y v �l \�•' � � ,� ��
�� ..� � 4 f`• ± ,
�
�.. "� :.i.� � *...�
♦�.'. � , . _ #' .'� ...
,�-#� �, �ie �� � � , � ''' = '11� .�.'lw , ,� w�
�:, "�y„""ra""""""'"""'r � ` - �-.�, �""'�"""� , "
.�
,
�'�` �r� � � ;��!�, � ��`
+� � d ' � . . � ° ��� � ."� � ,i --_"�' �`�,�,
` .Y •5 �
�� " { � � t � ' � �
� . '..`:,ew � �1 �
� i.' .:��*y����'t ' � � �'�._ . 1� ,R '��'.`y."' �
PM �.t � w� :.,.
i '""'M . �. � A1;
� � �. ...: . � ��, �
.t �r.� 6 .. !..
�ro �� � � �� . �� .
. �� � � �' .� �� . � �.d�
����� � , � � ' "'� � ..��• � ���
� ��, . � � r r � �� .1 r � �4
. �� ��r�I�A���` ,�" ,�n i
� ��� 1 p r11 • T�
^# - M
• � . • -t1i �A� a . .
�t +
Aerial Map
Owner: Devcor N.Y. Developments, Inc. Case: FLD2012-02005
Site: 454 Mandalay Property Size: 0.1 1 acres
PIN: 08-29-15-16398-000-0780 Atlas Page: 267A
�_ _
--� � 50o HDR �
-- - — --- - �
� �
� �
- - _ — T---- �— ? ? -
;-�—_f'_,-r—�;-�I � 499 M j �
P ?�V C Vi :h��(JhV�]hb�D;
� � I 495
� � I� 490��� 489 492,� 4
I I !i i
,.I i i ., '487 I
L� II �' I 4901
�i �� 484' �485 i � 479
i �
� ! 479
�-- � -� '483 '' 477 484j
478;� 490 ; r �� 480i��
�1 �
i 478-.; j� ; 475� � 475
�
_.-�4'9`4-� i 470'� � Q �
v ,, I,� I� � � �
�-- i
��--- .' 472 i
� SAN MARC 4__ j� ; a�s I,' Qn;j� ,��
�_ �
� �'L' �� � 473
� —
^ �- ��'T 464; ;
—��---.--_ �-- �� � �� 471
P ^ 468 467 i 466�.�' � ; dfiq_
-------4� 470 i� ' Q �
465{ -- _-_- J ; � 462' � �� 465
asz l�
i 460 , �� 457 �� Q i 460 � 463
, �� Q � Q
��-�- - � : 453 , � �453 454
���� Q � 451 ' � I 451-—.�
—
- - 'ii-�_
------\ ; 5� � i 44s �
� � ; � y .. 450
Q .; ; 454 i � , 449
_ 44g'
2
_ _—
5 - �4�
---- � 447 O — -
� � 44
�—�I�4,� � ; 443 �..__..—_—� .
.-_44,
� � o ��� i � 443
__.._..___— .- .___-_. —_-__- _ y� . _ ._—_.--
PAPAYA ST � _ — 44�
; � -- -- - � ��433 �� m 432^' ,— ----__ ._.
/ —..-. -.— .-.- .--_-. _- P V P V'I � h � ';� 44�
� —
43B ' 425
431
430 ' •-�429 ---- --j i� -
; 439 i 423
1
-- 427Mefer--_� ---_-_—�
428 �
i 423 -�-- -. . .-- ----
� 429
426 j 47g
415
--+ ------ ,
413 422 i
�411 �
' 409--- � 923B
- 407�- -- 423A
i
�-4b5— .. ____.- � --_ _- ;� 411
Zoning Map
Owner: Devcor N.Y. Developments, Inc. Case: FLD2012-02005
Site: 454 Mandalay Property Size: 0.1 1 acres
i
PIN: 08-29-15-16398-000-0780 Atlas Page: 267A
IDLEWILD �
�
GLENDALE
� ROYAL AY � G
�
HE I L WOOD �
� BAY ? i
a
AVALON � � � op
0 r
KENDALL �uanita Z � Z
0 ❑a N �
BAY ESPLANADE m N�N P
ROCKAWAY W
S
Ambler
BAYMONT ST PROJECT \N,�
SI TE SKIFF QO
�w w �
> >
¢ ¢ r
SAN MA p �
� O
O �O�p �
� N�N POINT o
PAPAYA ST
>- Q � DORY P
¢ w w �
z° z
�
� a
a
Pier gp O glvd ��DCc
Causeway
s`�D� WIN
Q �EVO
�
m� � �
O
SECOND �FV��
S7 DR
THIRD
ST
Location Map
Owner: Devcor N.Y. Developments, Inc. Case: FLD2012-02005
Site: 454 Mandalay Property Size: 0.1 1 acres
PIN: 08-29-15-16398-000-0780 Atlas Page: 267A
� 78657 � l�f �
500; '0prs�
� � m
BAYMONT ST � '
z ?
�5Z � 45 e- �n n m� �
�' _58_ ao j-4� —�"� �v V v�� so �u�aivihu�'om; so �
^ 59 490� r 495 43 I ! 9 1
60 ' I ll�= -� g� 492 li
� A tached s' _I � ��� - � - I�' � I
62 �;.� m — � 3 I qg5 3 490
avm �7�7 63�18fi� � ��� � �� — — — — — � � 47
� 2 d'i4 I (,.,j 9 � q � i� 479 I 1
--1 L �K � 38� I 477 4 4� I
2.33 Ac�c� � — —� — —
74378* 78� 5 490 i � 5 48b
I
� � � r �� - 3 � - - - �
4 � 1� 6 �475 � I 475
4 � ��34 �J� � I 6 � �
w 33 j q i � � 7 Q
" � ---__— a�o� ,�� �� az C � _ _ i Q � — — �
� �— _ �� _ 30 � B 464 I � � 4� 6 I Q
r
�.--�� tal� '— , � 471
Attactied .��� � �sr28-� _ 9 _ ; � � g as� � i
Dwellings 46� � z�_1 Q�o' Z �� � i 8
PHASE 1 �Tl 464 � - - �� ; � i �� B ! 465
�� r — zs a ; �� IW ,' — —
� � �E,'I' � d57 11 �WBb 463 9
54658 � � ' ; �
� — � � �r3 23_ I 4�3� 45� — — —
LF _ _-''_ 7E 4 M � �J1?zJ 12 — J'� �4 1M 12 10
I I
� � {, I_
�� eo _ Sp � 4491�1� 13 454 I I g� 1345Y j - —
Re �'1_ —I ^ — — — , „
PHASE 2 �a ��� r — �,8- 14— —I�� �� 14 44� I��
2z02 993_ J
N � ��N_� r 1� PAPAYA S ,s , ' ,z
— ---- --------� � 's� — � T— aao aas
� Servic� � ° °
e
F — �— ,— ___
--- �! ;� �� —
-- --- - 4�r 1 �a ! � �441 q
; � 2
Q i�3'r 4 41 '432� 2�6 i 425 Z
4301 Q � 429� -� 40 i r 439 g � i 423 3
J i 42ANetkr '
� ; �_� �-� — 4 — —
� — $ as i ' aZ I
Z I T23— — �— — — —I �� �
� i— — �� �— 38 — y; F 429 5426 j i 4159— — —
11 �
415 �y 37 B 6 i
— �� —6 — — —
�VeTlllgllt z3mi ��419 143 '4 36 �� �422 I �� 7
f�CC01111110C1�1t1011S � � 40 15 ; i� 423 � �
9.66 Ac�c� ' 407�s i 423 8 � ' O 9
��1
Existing Conditions Map
Owner: Devcor N.Y. Developments, Inc. Case: FLD2012-02005
Site: 454 Mandalay Property Size: 0.1 1 acres
PIN: 08-29-15-16398-000-0780 Atlas Page: 267A
, :
=��P The
-- ,
�� .��`�± SUS�aI n�blllty
� � �:
Ms. Ellen Crandall, Planner II March 12, 2012
City of Clearwater Planning and Development Dept.
100 South Myrtle Avenue
Clearwater, Florida 33756
(727) 562 4567
Re: Coffee Culture & Union Burger Resubmittal Package
454 Mandalay Avenue, Clearwater, Fl
Case Number: FLD2012-02005
Dear Ms. Crandall:
Enclosed, in reply to the review issued by the Development Review Committee, please find (15)
fifteen sets of revised plans, application documents, and three(3) copies of the revised parking
study. Listed below is a copy of the comments followed by the appropriate response in bold
lettering.
Best Regards,
�C:i`"�
Richard reel, LEED AP NC,ASMCE
727-488-1002
Case number: FLD2012-02005 -- 454 MANDALAY AVE
Owner(s): Beach Bar Investment LLC
Po Box 930
St Petersburg, FL 33734
PHONE: No phone, Fax: No fax, Email: No email
Applicant: PHONE: No phone, F�: No fax, Email: No email
Representative: Alex Azan
4124 Headsail Drive
New Port Richey, FL 34652
PHONE: 7274881002, F�: 7273734262, Email: Alxazan@gmail.com
Location: West side of Mandalay roughly 150 feet north of Papaya Street.
Atlas Page: 267A
Zoning District: Tourist
Request: (subject to change)Flexible Development approval to permit 4,296 square
feet of restaurant in the Tourist(T)District and Destination Resort
� Character District with a lot area of 5,012 square feet, a lot width of 50
feet, a front (east) setback of 2.6 (to building) and zero to pavement, a side
(south) setback of zero feet(to building), a side (north) setback of zero
feet(to building), a rear(west} setback of 1.16 feet (to building), a building
height of 22 feet (to parapet), and zero parking spaces through a parking
demand study as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project under the
provisions of Community Development Code Section 2-801.1 and 2-
803.C.
Proposed Use: Restaurants
Neighborhood Clearwater Beach Association
Association(s):
Presenter: Ellen Crandall, Planner II
The DRC reviewed this application with the following comments:
En ing eerin�Review Prior to Building Construction Permit:
1) Applicant shall bring all sub-standard sidewalks and sidewalk ramps
adjacent to or a part of the project up to standard, including A.D.A.
standards (raised detectable tactile surfaces or truncated domes per
FDOT Index#304).
a) This has been added as note#26 on the cover sheet, under Site Data Table Notes.
2)Please provide details for the grease interceptor that meet the
requirements of the City of Clearwater Construction Standards#307
(grease interceptor details).
a) On Sheet C5,the grease trap was revised to reflect requirements of City of Clearwater
Construction Standards Index#307. A copy of the detail was also added to this sheet.
General Notes:
1. Sheets C2, C3, C5, and C6 were not reviewed. This level of detail is not
required for this submittal and will be reviewed prior to receipt of the
building permit.
a. Acknowledged.
Environmental Review General Note(s)
1. DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review,
additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a
Building Permit Application.
a. Acknowledged.
2. An Asbestos Survey is usually required prior to conducting any
demolition or renovations. Contact Pinellas County Air Quality
(727/464-4422)for more information.
a. This has been added to the Site Data Table General notes #25, on the cover sheet.
Fire Review 1) Show location of closest fire hydrant, must be within 300' on the same side
of the street. ACKNOWLEDGE PRIOR TO CDB
a. Acknowledged.
2)Plan shows dumpster what appears to be inside of the building, note All
dumpsters, and any associated screening which consists of combustible fencing
around the dumpster pad shall have a minimum separation from the nearest
building or building overhang of ten feet (10') ACKNOWLEDGE PRIOR TO
CDB
a. Acknowledged. The egisting dumpster shall be contained in a separated enclosure with
one hour fire rated structure and fire sprinkler which will equal two hour separation.
3)Plan shows adjacent building, must meet the requirements ofNFPA-96, 2008
Edition Standard for Ventilation Control and Fire Protection of Commercial
Cooking Operations 7.8.2 Rooftop Terminations. 7.8.2.1 Rooftop terminations
shall be arranged with or provided with the following:
(1)A minimum of 3 m(10 ft)of horizontal clearance from the outlet to adjacent
buildings, property lines, and air intakes
(2) A minimum of 1.5 m(5 ft)of horizontal clearance from
the outlet (fan housing)to any combustible structure
(3) A vertical separation of 0.92 m(3 ft) below any exhaust outlets
for air intakes within 3 m (10 ft) of the exhaust outlet
(4)The ability to drain grease out of any traps or low points formed in the fan or
duct near the termination of the system into a collection container that is
noncombustible, closed, rainproof, and structurally sound for the service to which
it is applied and that will not sustain combustion
(5) A grease collection device that is applied to exhaust systems that does not
inhibit the performance of any fan
(6) Listed grease collection systems that meet the requirements of 7.8.2.1(4) and
7.8.2.1(5)
(7) A listed grease duct complying with Section 4.4 or ductwork complying with
Section 4.5
(8) A hinged upblast fan supplied with flexible weatherproof electrical cable and
service hold-open retainer to permit inspection and cleaning that is listed for
commercial cooking equipment with the following conditions:
(a)Where the fan attaches to the ductwork,the ductwork shall be a minimum of
0.46 m(18 in.) away from any roof surface, as shown in Figure 7.8.2.l.
(b) The fan shall discharge a minimum of 1.02 m(40 in.) away from any roof
surface, as shown in Figure 7.8.2.l.
(9) Other approved fan, provided it meets both of the following:
(a) The fan meets the requirements of 7.8.2.1(3)and 8.1.3.
(b) Its discharge or its e�ended duct discharge meets the requirements of
7.8.2.1{2). (See 8.1.3.)
a. Acknowtedged. Details of construction shall be submitted for building permit
review.
Planning Review 1. Please be aware that at the time of Business Tax Receipt permitting an
Outdoor seating permit will be required for the seating in the public
sidewalk.
a. Acknowledged.
2. Provide building elevations showing the proposed railing and sidewalk
seating.
a. Will Comply. Please see revised etevation drawing showing detail of rails. Rails will be
white aluminum and removable.
3. Provide landscape planters for the outside cafe area.
a. Ezisting concrete pavement will be saw cut and removed creating two landscape planters
on private property. `Ixora Coccinea' will be ptanted and maintained into small
rectangular shrubs. This will help define the outdoor cafe seating area and fa�ade by
contributing to a tropical feel.
4. How is the proposed building facade Florida vernacular? Some of the
building facade details called for in Beach by Design include a tropical
theme, bright colors for trims and accents, Awnings to provide shade.
Landscaping (plants) in conjunction with the outside seating area. The
beach should look and feel different than any other urban area. The
proposed building facade is a quality design however it is appropriate for
anywhere, and must have a more Florida/Beach design or details.
a. Elevations have been revised to show new in-ground planters as-well as above ground
planters with palms. The revised elevations will have additional canopies,White metal
panels in lieu of mill finish. The revised building elevation have white aluminum cap
flashing in lieu of black. Storefront will be white in lieu of clear anodized. The overall
building color will have a light tan with a light brown face. The Trim work and moldings
will be painted a bright white. The added canopies will have a light tropical pastel color.
The sand stone material will be a random natural limestone sand color. This was chosen in
lieu of the standard brick which is used for the prototype. Also the side courtyard will have
tropical elements as well with hanging baskets and tropical fans. Over atl the building is
keeping the retail scale intact with coverage for shading on the sidewalk. The revised
details and colors on elevations will be sensitive to the Florida vernacular for the beac6.
5. On the site plan show the clear path of travel. This is the smallest
distance between the palm and the railing.
a. On sheet C4 and C5, a 4' wide clear pedestrian path of travel has been shown between
the existing palm trees and proposed railings.
6. Please be aware permanent railings will not be approved in the right of
way. Railings, seats, chairs, and other items in conjunction with the
outside seating must be temporary and moveable.
a. All outdoor dining components will be removable and temporary.
7. The maximum allowed ISR is 0.95 and the proposed ISR is 0.97.
Reduce the impervious area to be at 0.95 or below or at least improve the
ISR.
a. Per DRC meeting, this comment has been etiminated,due ta ezisting conditions.
8. Revise the parking demand study to exclude parking lot #63 as this is
proposed to be developed. Further discuss where employees will park, if
UB&CC has a plan for employee paxking or if employees are on their own
to park or find alternative transportation. Further, the required parking is
not reduced by the previous use. The required parking spaces are 64, based
on 15 parking spaces per 1000 feet of floor area.
a. The parking demand study is revised as requested. To assist with understanding the
parking situation within Clearwater Beach,UB&CC will provide information and
orientation to its employees regarding parking facilities and services available within the
vicinity of UB&CC,e.g. City maps of parking facilities, information about the Jolly
Trolley, etc.
Stormwater Review General note:
1. DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional
comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit
Application.
a. Acknowledged.
Traff c En�Review Prior to a Community Development Board:
1. Provide a clear and unobstructive width of 4'wide on sidewalk along
property's frontage for accessibility per ADA requirements. Ensure that
the palm trees do not obstruct 4'wide path.
a. On sheet C4 and C5, a 4' wide clear pedestrian path of travel has been shown between
the existing palm trees and proposed railings.
Parking Study conditions:
1. Do not include parking lot#63 as available parking due to a proposed
Walgreens occupying the lot.
a. The parking demand study is revised as requested
2. Add the amount of parking spaces that the proposed Walgreen' s at 400
East Shore Drive will require. (See Walgreen's parking study conducted
by Gulf Coast Consulting.)
a. The parking demand study is revised as requested
General Note(s):
1. DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional
comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit
Application.
a. ACKNOWLEDGED.
IMPERVIOUS SURFACE RATIO(total square footage of impervious areas divided by the total square footage of entire site):
Existing: 0 974 ISR(4.882.47 SF)
Proposed: 0 974 ISR(4.872.87 SF)
Maximum Permitted: 0.950 ISR(4.761.40 SF)
DENSITY(units,rooms or beds per acre): BUILDING HEIGHT:
Existing: N/A Existing: N/A
Proposed: N/A Proposed: 22'-8"TO TOP OF PARAPET
Maximum Permitted: N/q Maximum Permitted: 35'
OFF-STREET PARKING:
Existing: 0
Proposed: p
Minimum Required: LOW:30 SPACES
HIGH:65 SPACES(SEE PARKING REDUCTION STUDI�
WHAT IS THE ESTIMATED TOTAL VALUE OF THE PROJECT UPON COMPLETION? S $225,0�
ZONING DISTRICTS FOR ALL ADJACENT PROPERTY:
North: T rist"T'
South: Tourist'T'
East: Tourist'T'
West: Tourist"T'
STATE OF FLORIDA,COUNTY OF PINELLAS �7�
I, the undersigned, acknowledge that all Sworn to and subscribed before me this day of
representations made in this application are true and �f��C� , �ZU�Z .�and/or by
accurate to the best of my knowledge and authorize . __
City representatives to visit and photograph the �i X /1'Z�/J ,who i personally know has
property described in is appli tion. produced as identification.
�0
Sig ure property own o epresentative Nota ub ic, ,l
�' My commission expires: Vr^�� ��
GOD MEDEIItOS
MY COhA�IISSION#DDY691E0
E?CF'IRFS:Apti106.2013
t ARY fl.Nany Disoaao[Atfac.Co.
Planning 8�Devebpment Depardnent,100 S.Myrtle Avenue,Clearvvater,FL 33756,Tel:727-562�567;Fax:727-562�4865
Page 3 of 8 Revised 01/12
. .
�ITY OF CLEARWATER
��� ; AFFIDAVIT TO AUTHORIZE AGENT
=- PLANNING &DEVELOFMENT SERWICES ADMINISTRATION
MUMCIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE,2°''FLOOR
PHONE(727)-562-4567 FAX(721j 562-45T6
Devcor N.Y.Developments,Inc.
Gus Karamountms and Peter Karamounlzos
(Name of all property av�ers)
1. That(I am/we are)the owner(s)and record titie hoider(s) of the foilowing described property:
454 Mandalay Avenue,Cleanruater, Fi 33767
(Address or General Location)
2. That this property constitutes the property for which a request for a:
Conversion o#existing land use from Bar/Nightdub to
estaurant&iMerior/exfierior renovations.
(Nature of request)
3. That the undersigned (has/have)appointed and (doesfdo)appoint
The Susiainability Group LLC 8�friside Out Group lnc. ____
as(hisldieir)agent(s)m acecu�any pditions or other docurrients necessary to aftect such petrtwn,
4. That this affidavit has been executed to induce the City of Clearwater, Florida to consider and act
on the above described property;
5. That{Uwe),the undersigned authority, heceby certr�r that t�e farego9ng is t'sue and corre�t.
,.� _ _
�..--='-G�''�.�''.'=- �---a
CINDY M.FORBT�APA3 Prot�ertv owr�r
irr co�ousscox�nn�MS3t
�SS;11/y 1lti�14 Property Owner
FI.1�1aWPDi�oartAMOt Cs
STATE OF FIORID ��Y
COUNTY OF PII�LLAS
Before me the undersigreed,an officer duly commissioned by�he laws of U�e State of Fbrida,on this �E�t� day of
�—`+�>�tuit'� , Zo ; personally appeared ��;.pti�,�ix.4�'23Mt1t,�l�"�':c� who having been first duly sworn
depose�"and says tfiat hefshe fuHy undetstancfs the confents af the affidavit thai he/she signed.
��%i . .r i,'. -""' - � ,��.,�/ �
!. .�,..�,r, {,�„r�1 ,.a;;.
�-- � N9Cary Public�
My Commission Expires: r ' f��,i r� �
�t/�Mj` t{�f � ,
S:appiication formsldevelopment review/Affidavit to Authonze Agent
. .
,
p Planning&Development Department
y l�earwater Flexible Develo ment A lication
� � P PP
� Attached Dwellings, Mixed-Uses or Non-Resrdential Uses
IT IS INCUMBENT URON THE APPLICANT TO SUBMIT COMPLETE AND CORRECT INFORMATION. ANY MISLEADING, DECEPTIVE,
INCOMPLETE OR INCORRECT INFORMATION MAY INVAIiDATE YOUR APPLICATION.
ALL APPLICATIONS ARE TO BE FILLED OUT COMPLETELY AND CORRECTLY,AND SUBMITTED IN PERSON(NO FAX OR DELIVERIES)
TO THE PLANNIIVG&DEVEIOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY NOON ON THE SCHEDULED DEADLINE DATE.
A TOTAI OF 11 COMPLETE SETS OF PLANS AND APPUCATION MATERIALS{i ORIGINAL AND 10 COPIES)AS REQUIRED WITHIN
ARE TO BE SUBMITTED FOR RENIEW BY THE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITfEE. SUBSEQUENT SUBMITTAL FOR THE
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD WILL REQUIRE 15 COMPLETE SETS OF PlANS AND APPLICATION MATERIALS(1 ORIGINAL
APID 14 COPIES). PLANS AND APPLICATIONS ARE REQUIREQ TO BE COLLATED,STAPLED AND FOLDED IRITO SETS.
THE APPL[CANT, BY FIUNG THIS APPUCATION, AGREES TD COMPLY WITH ALL APPUCABLE REQUIREMENTS OF THE
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE.
FIRE DEPT PRELIMARY SITE PLAN REVIEW FEE: $200
APPLICATION FEE: $1,205
PROPERTY OWNER(PER DEED): Devcor N.Y. Developments, Inc.
MAILING ADDRESS: 454 Mandalay Avenue,Clearwater,FI 33767
PHONE NUMBER: Devcor N.Y.Developments,Inc.
EMAIL: Devcor N.Y.Developments, Inc.
AGENT OR REPRESENTATIVE: The Sustainability Group LLC
MAILING ADDRESS: 4124 Headsail Drive New Port Richey FI
PHONE NUMBER: 727-�88-1002
EMAII: ridc9960@gmail.com
ADDRESS OF SUBJECT PROPERTY: 454 Mandalay Avenue Clearwater FI 33767
PARCEL NUMBER(S): 0&29-15-1639&000-0780
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lots 78 and 79 Clearwater Beach Park on Cleanwater Beach(sland,according to the map or plat
thereof, as recorded in Plat Book 10, Page 42, Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida.
PROPOSED USE{5): Union Burqer 8�Coffee Culture Restaurant __
DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST: Attachment"A"
Specifically identify the request
(include all requested code flexibility;
e.g., reductiort in required number of
parking spaces, height setbacks, lot
size,lot width,specific use,etc.):
Planning 8 Development Depa�tment,100 S•Myrtle Avenue,Clearwater,FL 33756,Tel:727-562�1567;Fax:727-562-4865
Page 1 of 8 Revised 01/12
. ,
o Planning&Development Department
� � �earwater Flexible Development Application
� Data Sheet
PLEASE ENSURE THAT THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION IS FILLED OUT, IPI ITS ENTIRETY. FAILURE TO COMPLETE THIS FORM
WILL RESULT IN YOUR APPLICATION BEIN6 FOUND INCOMPLETE AND POSSIBLY DEFERRED UNTIL THE FOLLOWING
APPUCATION CYCIE.
ZONING DISTRICT: 'T'Tourist
F��TURE LAND USE PLAN DESI6NATIaN: "RFH"Resort Faalities High
EXISTING USE(currently existing on site): Bar/Night Club
PROPOSED USE(new use,if any;plus existing,if to remain):Kestaurant
SITE AREA: 5,012 sq.ft. 0.11 acres
6R055 FLOOR AREA(total square footage of all buildings):
Existing: 4,316 SF sq.ft.
Proposed: 4,296 SF sq.ft.
Maximum Allowable: - sq.ft.
GROSS FLOOR AREA(totaf square footage devoted to each use,if there will be multiple uses):
First use: 4,296 sq.ft.
Second use: sq.ft.
Third use: sq.ft.
FLOOR AREA RATIO(total square footage of all buitdings divided by the total square footage of entire site):
Existing: 0.86 FAR(4,316 SF)
Proposed: 0.85 FAR l4.296 SF)
Maximum Allowable: 1.00 FAR f5.012 SF)
BUILDING COVERAGE/FOOTPRINT(1�`floor square footage of all buildings):
Existing: 4 316 SF sq.ft. ( 86.11 %of sitej
Proposed: 4,296 SF sq.ft. ( 85.71 %of site)
Maximum Permitted: 1.0 FAR sq.ft. ( 100 %of site)
GREEN SPACE WITHIN VEHICULAR USE AREA(green space within the parking lot and interior of site;not perimeter buffer):
Existing: 129.53 SF sq,ft. ( 0 %of site)
Proposed: 139.13 SF sq.ft. ( 0 %of site)
VEHICULAR USE AREA(parking spaces,drive aisles,loading areaJ:
Existing: 0.00 SF sq•ft• � 0 %of site)
Proposed: 0.00 SF Sq•ft• � 0 %of site)
Planning&Development�epartment,700 S.Myrtle Avenue,Clearwater,FL 33T56,Tel:727-562�567;Fax:727-562-4865
Page 2 of 8 Revised 01/12
, ,
IMPERVIOUS SURFACE RATIO(totai square footage of impervious areas divided 6y the total square footage of entire site}:
Existing: 0.9741SR(4.882.47 SF)
Proposed: p.g74 ISR(4,872.87 SF)
Maximum Permitted: 0.950 ISR(4,761.40 SF)
DENSITY(units,rooms or beds per acre): BUILDING HE16HT:
Existing: N/A Existing: N!A
Proposed: N/A Proposed: 22'-8"TO TOP OF PARAPET
Maximum Permitted: N/q Maximum Permitted: 35'
OFF-STREET PARKING:
Existing: 0
Proposed: p
Minimum Required: LOW:30 SPACES
HIGH:65 SPACES(SEE PARKING REDUCTION STUDYj
WHAT I5 THE ESTIMATED TOTAL VALUE OF THE PROJECT UPON COMPIETION? $ $225,000
ZONIN6 DISTRICTS FOR ALL ADIACENT PROPERTY:
North: Tourist'T'
South: Tourist'T'
East: Tourist'T'
West: Tourist'T'
STATE OF FLORIDA,COUNTY OF PINELLAS
I, the undersigned, acknowledge that ali Sworn to and subscribed before me this day of
representations made in this application a�e true and .to me and/or by
accurate to the best of my knowledge a�d authorize
City representatives to visit and photograph the ,who is perso�aliy known has
property described in this application. produced as identification.
Signature of property owner or representative Notary public,
My commission expires:
Planning 8�Development Department,100 S.MyrHe Avenue,Clearwater,FL 33756,Tel:727562�567;Fax:727-562-4865
Page 3 of 8 Revised 01112
o Planning&Development Department
y lear�ater Flexible Develo ment A plication
� � P p
� Site Plan Submittal Package Check list
IN ADDITION TO THE COMPLETED FLIXIBLE DEVELOPMENT(FLD)APPLICATION,ALL FLD APPLICATIONS SHALL INCLUDE A SITE
PtAN SUBMITTAL PACKAGE THAT INCLUDES THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION AND/OR PLANS:
(� Responses to the flexibility criteria for the specific use(s) being requested as set forth in the Zoning District(s) in which the
subject property is located. The attached Flexible Development Application Flexibility Criteria sheet shall be used to provide
these responses.
� Responses to the General Applicability criteria set forth in Section 3-914.A. The attached Flexible Development Application
General Applicability Criteria sheet shall be used to provide these responses.
C� A signed a�d sealed survey of the property prepared by a registered land surveyor including the location of the property,
dimensions,acreage, location of all current structures/improvements, location of all public and private easements including
official reco�ds book and page numbers and street right(s)-0f-way within and adJacent to the site.
❑ If the application would result in the removal or relocation of mobile home owners residing in a mobile home park as
provided in F.S.§723.083,the application must provide that info�mation required by Section 4-202.A.5.
❑ If this application is being Submitted for the purpose of a boatlift,catwalk,davit,dock, marina,pier, seawall or other si milar
marine structure, then tfie application must provide detailed plans and specifications prepared by a Florida professional
engineer, bearing the seal and signature of the engineer,except signed and sealed plans shall not be required for the repair
or replacement of decking, stringers, railing, lower landings, tie piles, or the patching or reinforcing of existing piling on
private and commercial docks.
� A site plan prepa�ed by a professional architect,engineer or landscape architect drawn to a minimum scale of one inch equals
50 feet on a sheet size not to exceed 24 inches by 36 inches that includes the following information:
J� Index sheet of the same size shall 6e included with individual sheet numbers referenced thereon.
� North arrow,scale,location map and date prepared.
� Identification of the boundaries of phases,if development is proposed to be constructed in phases.
� Location of the Coastal Construction Control Line(CCCL), whether the property is located within a Special Flood Hazard
Area,and the Base Flood Etevation(BFE}ofthe property,as applicable.
� Location,footprint and size of afl existing and proposed buildings and structures on the site.
� Location and dimensions of vehicular and pedestrian circulation systems, both on-site and aff-site,with proposed poi�ts
of access.
� Location of all existing and proposed sidewalks, curbs,water lines, sanitary sewer lines, storm drains,fire hydrants and
seawalls and any proposed utility easements.
� Location of onsite and offsite stormwater management facilities as well as a narrative describing the proposed
stormwater control plan including calculations. Additional data necessary to demonstrate compliance with the City of
Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteria manual may be required at time of buitding construction permit.
� Location of solid waste collection facilities,required screening and provisions for accessibility for collection.
� Location of off-street loading area,if required by Sedion 3-1406.
I$( All adjacent right(s}-of-way,with indication of centerline and width,paved width,existing median cuts and intersections
and bus shelters.
Q� Dimensions of existing and proposed lot lines,streets, drives, building lines,setbacks, structural overhangs and building
separations.
1$1 Building or structure elevation drawings that depict the proposed building height and building materials.
Planning&Development Departrnent,100 S.Myrtle Avenue,Clearwater,FL 33756,Tel:727-56Z�567;Fax:727-562-4865
Page 4 of 8 R�visAd 01l12
I$1 Typical floor plans,including floor plans for each floor of any parking garage.
� Demolition plan.
� Identification and description of watercourses, wetlands, tree masses, specimen trees, and other environmentaily
sensitive areas.
� If a deviation from the parking standards is requested that is greater than 50% (excluding those standards where the
difference between the top and bottom of the range is one parking space), then a parking demand study will need ta be
provided. The findings of the study will be used in determining whether or not deviations to the parking standards are
approved.Please see the adopted Parking Demand Study Guidelines for further information.
❑ A tree survey showing the location, DBH and species of all existing trees with a DBH of four inches or more, and identifying
those trees proposed to be removed,if any.
0 A tree inventory, prepared by a certified arborist, of all trees four inches DBH or more that reflects the size, canopy, and
condition of such trees may be required if deemed applicable by staff.Check with staff.
O A Traffic Impact Study shall be required for all proposed developments if the total generated net new trips meet one or more
of the following conditions:
■ Proposal is expected to generate 100 or more new trips in any given hour{directional trips,inbound or outbound on the
abutting streets)and/or 1,000 or more new trips per day;or
• Anticipated new trip generation degrades the level of service as adopted in the City's Comprehensive Plan to
unacceptable levels;or
■ The study area contains a segment of roadway and/or intersection with five reportable accidents within a prior twelve
month period,or the segment and/or intersection exists on the City's annual list of most hatardous locations, provided
by the City of Clean�vater Police Department;or
■ The Traffic Operations Manager or their designee deems it necessary to require such assessment in the plan review
process. Examples include developments that are expected to negatively impact a constrained roadway or developments
with unknown trip generation and/or other unknown factors.
❑ A landscape plan shall be provided for any projed where there is a new use or a change of use;or an existing use is improved
or remodeled in a value of 25%or more of the valuation of the principal structure as reflected on the property appraiser's
current records, or if an amendment is required to an existing approved site plan; or a parking lot requires additional
landscaping pursuant to the p�ovisions of Article 3,Division 14. The landscape plan shall include the following information, if
not otherwise required in conjunction with the application for development approval:
0 Location, size, description, specifications and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materiats, including
botanical and common names.
❑ Existing trees on-site and immediately adjacent to the site,by species,size and location,including drip line.
❑ Interior landscape areas hatched and/or shaded and labeled and interior landscape coverage, expressed both in square
feet, exclusive of perimeter landscaped strips, and as a perce�tage of the paved area coverage of the parking lot and
vehicular use areas.
❑ Location of existing and proposed structures and improvements, including but not limited to sidewalks, walls, fences,
pools, patios, dumpster pads, pad mounted transformers, fire hydrants, overhead obstructions, curbs, water lines,
sanitary sewer lines,storm drains, seawalls, utility easements,treatment of all ground surfaces,and any other features
that may influence the proposed landscape.
❑ Location of parking areas and other vehicular use areas, including parking spaces, circulation aisles, interior landscape
islands and curbing.
0 Drainage and retention areas,including swales,side slopes and bottom elevations.
❑ Delineation and dimensions of all required perimeter landscaped buffers including sight triangles,if any.
Planning 8 Developmerrt Dspar6nent,100 S.Myrtle Avenue,Clearwater,FL 33756,Tel:727�562-4567;Fax:727-562-4865
Page 5 of 8 Revised 01I12
o Planning&Development Department
� � ea�water Flexible Development Application
� General Applicability Criteria
PROVIDE COMPLETE RESPONSES TO EAtH OF THE SIX(6j GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA EXPLAINING HOW,IN DETAII,THE
CRITERION IS BEING COMPLIED WITH PER THIS DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL.
1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent
properties in which it is located.
See Attachment"B"
2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings
or significantly impair the value thereof.
See Attachment"B"
3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety or persons residing or working in the neighborhood
of the proposed use.
See Attachment"B"
4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traftic congestion.
See Attachment"B"
5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for
development.
See Attachment"B"
6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of
operation impacts,on adjacent properties.
See Attachment"B"
Planning 8 Developme�rt Department,100 S.Myrtle Avenue,Cleanuater,FL 33756,Tel:727-562-456�;Fax:727-562�d865
Page 6 of 8 Revised 01/12
o Planning&Development Department
� C earwat�r Flexible Development Application
� Flexibility Criteria
PROYIDE COMPLETE RESPONSES TO THE APPLICABLE FLIXIBILITY CRITERIA FOR THE SPECIFIC USE(S)BEING REQUESTED AS SET
FORTH IN THE ZONING DISTRICT(S)IN WHICN THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS LOCATED. EXPLAIN HOW,IN DETAII�EACH CRITERION
IS BEING COMPLIED WITH PER THIS DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL(USE SEPARATE SHEETS AS NECESSARY).
1 See Attachment"C"
2_ See Attachment"C"
3. See Attachment"C"
4. See Attachment"C"
5 See Attachment"C"
6. See Attachment"C"
7.
8.
Planning&Devebpmerrt Departrnent,100 S.Myrtle Avenue,Clearwater,FL 33756,Tel:727-562-4567;Fax:727-562at865
Page 7 of 8 Revised 01N2
ATTACHMENT A
DESCRIPTI4N OF REQUESTS
A conversion of permitted use from "bar"to "restaurant"for the subject property at 454 Mandalay
Avenue, Clearwater Beach, FI 33767_ The existing 4,296 sf building will renovated and brought
into compliance per City of Clearwater requirements.
The request includes:
. Outdoor dining area.
. Conversion from bar to restaurant use.
• Modification fram required off street parking to shared parking within public parking
available along Mandalay Avenue�ntersecting streets and public parking lots within the
vicinity.
• Reduction in front(east) building setback from 15 ft to 2.3 ft.
• Reduction in rear(west) building setback from 20 ft to 1.27 ft.
• Reduction in sides (north &south) setbacks from 10 ft to 0 ft.
ATTACHMENT B
GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA
1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with scale,bu/k,coverage density
and character of adjacent properties in which it is located in
The redeveiopment of the property is consistent with revitalization goals and the character set forth in
Beach by Design for the Resort Destination area,while contributing to the redevelapment of properties
between Papaya and San Marco.The proposed development will maintain similar zero setback lot lines
as the existing conditions a{ong Mandalay Avenue.The Building in plan and elevation will be broken up
in a way that the concept will read as two separate buildings that will complement the adjacent
neighbors in lieu of one big box over powering them.The elevations will have several steps in heights.
The building elevation will have a low end on the north eastside of building matching the adjacent
building to the North and wi{I step up to the South East side to bridge the elevation heights of the
adjacent building to the South. The scale of the building will be an average between the newer
development adjacent on south side and the older existing deveiopment adjacent to the North. Also
introduced in plan will be the utifization of outdoor dining in the side entry alley located on the south
end of property.This will help create inviting step backs in plan for both programmatic and visual
interest.
2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and
use of the adjacent land and buildings or significant/y impair the value thereof.
The current use af the building is a nightclub/bar that is non-conforming.The newly proposed
development is a unique combination unit that will serve as restaurant and a coffee house.The
development will not hinder its neighbors,but will become a place valued by both tourist and local
residents.Currently the existing conditions of the building are in much need for updating and repair.The
Building will be renovated and updated in a manner that witl bring value to the adjacent properties.The
fa�ade wi(i be revitalized contributing ta a more active fa�ade along North Mandalay Avenue.The value
of the abutting properties will not be compromised,and will likely be enhanced by the development of
the project.
3. The proposed wil/not adversely affect!he health or safety of persons residing or working in
ihe neighborhood of ihe proposed use.
Rehabititation of the existing structure replaces the existing older non-conforming nightclub/bar
building.There are no proposed uses other than restaurant/dining;hence,the aforementioned uses will
not adversely affect the health or safety of persons residing or working in the neighborhood.
4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion.
The 4,296 sf restaurant establishments will reduce traffic congestion,by providing a service suitable for
walk-up traffic from focal employees,neighbors and pedestrians fram the beach. As City Staff is aware,
many of the retaif shops,restaurants,etc.,within this district(Tourist,T}are not specific trip
destinations/trip generators. Rather,the aforementioned locations are secondary,and even tertiary,
consequential destinations to tourists,vacationers,and others whose primary trip is to visit/walk/enjoy
the beach.
5. The proposed developmeni is consistent with the community character of the immediaie
vicinity of the parcel proposed for development.
The architectural design of the building will provide most af the desired elements that are listed in the
beach by design tourist(destination resort)district far Clearwater Beach.The pedestrian level will be
enhanced by providing canopies,operable storefront windows,and outdoor dining.The visual interest
will be that the building material will have different textures by having a water table of a smooth stone
finish and pilasters that will have a rock face�nish.The building will have step backs both vertical and
horizontal planes.We are addressing the horizontal pfane with,pilasters,outdoor dining areas, and
open penetrations to courtyard.We are addressing the Vertical plane by stepping the parapet heights,
providing pilasters with different material finishes,and providing architectural elements such as wall
sconces, molded copings,and canopies. There will be new in-ground planters as-well as potted planters
with small arnamental palms.The front windows in elevation will all have canopies extending over three
feet.,White metal panels wi11 add a transition of heavy sandstone type material to a lightweight material
that is used in Florida vernacular architecture.The new building elevation have white aluminum cap
flashing.Storefront will be white.The overall building color will have a light tan with a light brown face.
The Trim work and moldings will be painted a bright white.The added canopies will have a iight tropical
pastel cofor.The sand stone material will be a random natural limestone sand color.This was chosen in
lieu of the standard brick which is used for the prototype.Also the side courtyard will have tropical
elements as well with hanging baskets and tropica{fans.Over all the building is keeping the retail scale
intact with coverage for shading on the sidewalk.The revised deta+ls and colors on elevations will be
sensitive to the Florida vernacular for the beach.
6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse efferts,induding visual, acoustic
and olfadory and hours of impacts, on adjacent properties.
The proposed development minimizes adverse effects on adjacent properties by creating a more active
street level fa�ade contributing to the redevelopment of North Mandalay Avenue, between Papaya and
San Marco. The redevelopment of the property will reduce acoustic and oldfactory effects by upgrading
existing infrastructure. The hours of operation will be in harmony with other restaurant establishments
along North Mandalay Avenue in the Destination Resort district.
ATTACHMENT C
FLEXIBILITY CRITERIA FOR SPECIFIC USE(S)
1. Lot area and width:The reduction in lot area will not resuit in a building which is out of scale
with existing buiidings in the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for devefopment;
a. There is no request to reduce the lot area.The existing parcel suffices meeting the 5,000
sf minimum as outlined under Clearwater Land Development Code"T"Tourist district.
2. location:The use of the parce! proposed for development will not invoive direct access to a
major arterial street;
a. The proposed development will have zero parking stalls,thus not giving vehicular access
to North Mandalay Avenue.
3. Height:
a. The increased height results in an improved site plan and/or improved design and
appearance;
i. There is no request to increase the height above what is allowable per code.
On the proposed fa�ade,the highest point of the parapet will be 22'-8", 12.34
feet below code.
4. 5igns: No sign of any kind is designed or located so that any portion of the sign is more than
six feet above the finished grade of the front lot line of the parcel proposed for
development unless such signage is a part of an approved comprehensive sign program;
a. There are no signs proposed beyond what is allowed per code.
5. Side and rear setback:
a. The reduction in front setback contributes to a more active and dynamic street life;
i. The reduction to the front setback allows for a more dynamic street life by
creating a pedestrian friendly environment and matching existing building
fronts along Mandalay Avenue.
b. The reduction in front setback results in an improved site plan or improved design and
appearance.
i. The reduction to the front setback allows for rehabilitation of the existing
outdated structure,thus improving the appearance along North Mandalay
Avenue and surrounding properties.
c. side and rear setback does not prevent access to the rear of any building by
emergency vehicles;
i. The reduction to the rear and side setbacks match existing conditions and do
not hinder emergency access.
d. The reduction in side and rear setback results in an improved site plan, more efficient
parking ar improved design and appearance and landscaped areas are in excess of the
minimum required.
i. The reduction of the side and rear setbacks will be maintained by the exterior
shell of the building.There are no improvements proposed to the north and
south sides of the building envelope,other than the proposed outdoor dining
are.The reduction to the side and rear setbacks allows for the proposed
development to justify the rehabilitation of the subject praperty.
6. Off-street parking:
a. The physical characteristics of a proposed building are such that the likely use of the
property wiil requi�e fewer parking spaces per fioor area than otherwise required or
that the use of significant portions of the building will be used for storage vr other
non-parking demand-generating purposes;
i. The proposed restaurant establishment lies within the Tourist(T� district of
Beach by Design,and,as such,aliows for the capture of pedestrian vacationing
within the area,beach visitors,local workers from other establishments,and
patrons of local resorts.
b. Fast food restaurants shall not be eligible for a reduction in the number of off-street
parking spaces.
i. The design and functionality of Union Burger and Coffee Culture creates a dine-
in experience whereby pedestrian traffic may have a sit-down meal and
beverages.
c. Adequate parking is available on a shared basis as determined by all existing land uses
within 1,000 feet of the parce!proposed for development,or parking is available through any
existing or planned and committed parking facilities or the shared parking formulas in
Article 3, Division 14.
i. Please refer to the attached Parking Analysis. The Analysis demonstrates
adequate parking is provided within the vicinity,on a shared basis. As
indicated in the City's Beach By Design documentation,implementation of the
Pelican Walk Parking garage would ensure sufficient parking for businesses
within this area.
� � ' `Frem:.Jr�f��ES C�. LAh�'ATNAK I u, F'.A. 7?i 73�i 1999 �l/`��!2U 12 OI:A i #C�18 P.C�O�ffJC��'
'1'his dotu�tient preparnci by nnd tetvrn to:
Le�nE Title�x�ltaii�,e,lnc.
11015,t3elche:Road,Sie ff
Ta��o,PI.33771
=lL,E AIU:11-30
e'arcei;dantifiralion A7uinUer:OB-2a-15-1639R-Q06�d , -
�� � f �3�1 o��cj
r j
b1T.�t�'V�'l.'D�ED
,
THI�S II�IDfiN7U1iS,n�de tliis�___day of lanctary 2012,between Beach Bar Invesiment,LLC,
a I�iorida i.iabitity Company,whose add;ess.is].9&U C:entrril l�venue�St.Petersburg,FL 937��,of the
Cacuity of Pit�.eUas,State of Floricia,Grantnr,anci Bev or A�.Y.D�ve�opirtents,7nc.,a New York
Corpuralton, wl�ase address is `^'h�.�T� � �''t `�`'f��___ . ��=� .
Grantee. �,jr��.,��r r.=-a�� ` �f�—�� �1��'��
LYl'l7VE.SSE�tS_,:hat khe Grantur,for and I�i considernHon of p�e sum ot T'en and No/100 Dollazs(�I0.t7(}),..nd .
othet goad and valuab7e consideaa8or,to Grantor in hectd psid by Gruntce,tiie re:.eipt whereof is herebq
ntknaw]edged,has grazited,bargauiecf and sold iv khe saici Grnntee nnd Gran[ee's beirs and ass1��forever,llie
following des�lbec(1and,simaEe,lping and l�eing u�F2►e Coimiy of P�icselles,State of Fiorida,to ivit
fx�ts 78 and 79,ClearwaEer Beach Park on Clearwater TSeach LSland,acevrtlin�to ttie map
or plat thereof,as recorded in Piat Book I0,Page 42,Public Records of PinelIas County,
ilorida
Sub;ect to aui}+restrictions,reservations and easenients of record,if an}�,and taxes�ubsecZuent to 24'lI.
'To huve and to hnId,the saate,in tee simple Eorever.
'f'tie Grnntvr claes he.reby covenents tir."th said graniee that the gtantor is]awfully setzed of said Iznd in fee
simple;that tl�e grantar lias good r3gttt and lawful aufliority fa sell mtd convey sald lsnd,Rnd here4a}°warrnnLs thc title
to said lanci and will defend t11e same agaicuY the iawfu2 claic�s ef all pe.rsons,wliomsoev�-,tlsat said:and iE free c�f ail
encumbrances, '
IiV W1TNE5S W17�RE�F,the Grantnr(s)has/have hereuniD set their f�and(s}and seal(s)the day and year
fissh abave writte.n.
53gned,sealed and detivered in our gre5ence:
.� ?
�%. f r Fleach�' ve � .1 .
�L, � �jf ��,,f '�� r
� �,Wi �•: �`,r'��;ij-C�`[!(! • f' ��4• }2 _ e t ey,ManagingMetnber
C/ r� ;
� .
�. � , � � �'� �`'°.�-�.r
,���,�:.�..4��-�.-� , �� ,r� ",`
�1,�itress: S�--cL; 3� 1���r s•7�� . y;W' �Hillniazi.M�naging Mem6er
STA2�'OP FLQRIDA
cY�unr�Y or�-�r..i.,ns
��
The forego'tnp,irstzwnent tvas ackna�vledgeu�"B�fnre me dus:-�•-'�day of Jaziuery,201�,Uylames HarEiey,
Maneging;vlember and Witliam I-i[ilinan�Irlaiia�v�tg,A�Sember�vlt�is;larr`pezSOflaIly o�+�re tn mc or ltas producecl
idrsitiHca'.icn in�i;�orm a[ ,' !' ,`t` ,
t,�;;� � ,/(�i H'� i.�`�� �_..,__.,.,
r--�.'� ---�-------f.-'•-- _...
�NUI�3Ff�: ..-
, 1� i/�
TVi}+COIIliil3S5t�n ex�1L:S: _
'1
�ti.}u•���,�-�w�i�':FkiiL�3fLR1��,
`' UD813t�
�`'.e '.et :tty��:,�:�i�:}iM��''i r 0 0
��;+;.���'( :s �'.c�':!=��Lr•����19��12 '
' �'�.�(il�T c°.�OT,!i:9�':::�.•�U`:'.�1..�-.�SY.R:F,� `
� i c��.-:c�--=• • _ __ j
t a vK.-�h".�.� . .. . �
'
i
�
---_— � i
- VICINITY MAP YIL ENOINEERINO,PERYITTIN�
•�� ���U�.�v�� LAND PLANNINO,LANDBCAPE \
i lUBTAINABLE DlS13N
�
� � � PREPARED FOR: a
1 !
- � � DEVCOR N.Y. DEVELOPMENTS, LLC ��.,�.�,
� �. ��.�.�
454 MAN DALAY AVE N U E ��-,��-�
� � � CLEARWATER, FL 33767 "'�"°""" ' "�'"�`"
w.a s aas M+o Lw.�ir a
°° , aas�ona�ooa�ou oawruc
/ � INDEX
� VICINIT'Y � COVER SHEET C!
o '
-6C-MC-RAk+��;�e& 6�-
!
DEMOLITION PLAN C3
x.r.s SITE PLAN C4
P R O J E CT L O CAT I O N . GRADING,DRAINAGE&UTILITY PLAN �5
..y.� UNION BURGER & COFFEE
C U LT U R E R E STAU RAN T SITE DATA TABLE NOTEs:
i.OWFER NAME: DEYCOR N.Y.DEVELOPMENTS,INC.
PROJECT 454 MAN DALAY AVE N U E 464 MANDALAY AVENUE
CLEARWATER,FL 3376I
LOCATION 2.ENGINEER/LANDSCAPE DESIGN: THE SUSTAINABILITY 6ROUP,LLG
CLEARWATER, FL 33767 4124NEADSAILDRIVE
L�CA �ON�P . FNAX 727 646.6 05 ���6Z
PFiONE:7Y7.46B.1002
`�_���';�I �.. � S.ARCHITECT NAME: INSIDE OUT GROUP,INC.
' � 812 LOUDEN AVENUE
� "' �� PA RC E L i D• DUNBDIN,F� �qa
� � � PHONE:727JS4.S673
.r.. FA%:727.l71.2042
�"� � 08-29-15-16398-00�-0780
M �V� �� 3.SURVEYOR NAME: C.C.�.SURVEYINO 8 MAPPING,INC.
9TOS 6LEN MOOR LA1E
� t �r .�.j. ( � -.. POR�E ICNE 734.S67S6!
� � . .�t FAX:727.871.2042
4.PROJECT ADDRE53: 4b4 MAPOALAY AVEMIE
. CLEARWATER,fLORIDA 53767
. PARCEL tD M: OB-29-16-16l9&0�0780
;; : ..
, . , , � .:..... 6.ZONING: 'T-TOlkilsT
6.FUTURE LAND-USE: 'Rfli'-RESORT FACILITIES HIGH
7.BEACH BY DESIGN DiSTRICT: DESTINATION RESORT
� B.EXISTING USE: UNOCCUPIED
9.PROPOSED USE: RE9TAURANT
10.OVERALL PROJECT AREA: F.�SISIJ�S4 PROPOSED: �IRED:
� � � � B�UILDENG AREA: 4y 316.0 F ,296.00 S ���
,�,. � ���' ��� SIDEWALKMAVERS/MISC.: 566.47 SF 576.l7 SF
_ VENICU.AR USE AREA(PVMT.): 0.00 SF 0.00 SF
"'j TOTALIMPERVIOUSAREA: 4 2.47 0.974 4!1 7 971 7M.i0 . 0.%I
� ' TOTAL OrEN SPACE:
�.� PAftl(IN6 SPACES: 0 A
t*.�S II.SETBAtI(S: �J� pgQtQ�, RECINRED:
i NORTH(SIDE): 0.00 FT.(TO BWLDING) 0.00 FT.(TO BtNLDIN6) 10'
T�' �� ��~:.. SOUTH(SIOE): 0.00 FT.(TO BUILDING) � 0 F . 10' �
� EAST(FRONn: 2.60 PT.(TO BtNLDING) 2.30 FT.(TO WILDING) 16' ��
WE6T(RHAR} 1.16 PT.(TO BUILDING) I.Y7 FT.(TO 6WLDING) YO'
LEGAL DESCRIPTION 12.BUILDINO MEI6MT ffROM 8FE-II.O TO T�OF flAT ROOF): Y2'-!'FT.(TO TOP OF PARAPET
IEGAL DESCRIP11aW is.r,u+KiNC cu.w�a,na+s:
�on exisruw cruo�> �
TMERE SMALl BE 7-16 SPACES►!R I,000 SF OF ORO85 fL00R AREA �
LOTS�E ANO 7Y,CLEN11VAlER BFACN PAlMC OPI CLEARWAIER BEAt�F1 ISLAND, PER SFCTION 2J0�,FOR'T'OISTRICT FLE%IBLE STAMPRD
Ao001eDaiG TO 7ME MM OR PU►T ri�11E0F,AS RECONDED IN PLAT NOOK 10,PACE 4�, DEVllO►MENT REOULATIONS. �
vueuc�caas or ao�u.�s cau+rr.Fl.oHro�.
P,wKirw aeuuiRec:
HIQM: (4,2V6 SF)/(I,000 SF)x 16 SPACES•66 SPACES q
�� (4,YC6 9F)/f1,000 4F)x 7$rACEB� 30 SP10E5 iC
SECT:8,7WN:29S,RNO:15E PARKING PROVIDED:Y��
SEE PARKIN6 INLL �a'
14.TMIS PROPERTY APPEARS TO UE WITHIN FLOOD 20NE•AE-12'(EL•IM,AS SHOWN ON THE
PREPARED BY. FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP,COMMIAqTY PAI�L 112f03C0102G,PWLISHED BY THE R��
FLOOD ZONE: F6DERAL EMHR6ENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY,EfFECTIVE:09/OS/OS �
16.ALL UPPAVED S PAV�AR6A8 OISTURBED WITHIN RIOHT-OF-WAY SHAIL BE R63TORBD TO
� / T h e OR161NAL OR BETTER COWITION. � �
TH�S PROPERTY APPEARS TO BE IOCATED IN ZONE �AE�, AREA YN7HIN �` 16.ANY WORK WITHIN TME R-0-W.WILL RECUIRE A RIGMT-0f-WAY USE PEkM1T fOR �W>-(n-O Z tn
THE 100 YEAR FL000 PLAIN, PER F.I.R.M. (BFE�12') FEMA MAP � . . . LANDSCAPIN6 AM ALL OTHER I�WROVEMENTS aS80CInTEO W�TH TNE PRaECT.
C ' } 17.SM.ID WA8TE WILL BE PROVIDED BY ROLL-OUT DUMPSTER.
/12103C0102G, DATEO 09/03/2003. J�'4�' S u sta�n a � 'l.y 16.PlDESTRIAN 910EWALKS SNALL YE IN6TALLEOIN ACCORDANCE WITH TF1E GTY OF
..��:;;� G ro u p �WATER'8 REOUIRBMENT3 AND STANDARDS.ALL MOPOSED SIDEWALKS SNN1 NOT �\ti1l#.If_ /��/'
� t EXLEED A CROSS SLOPE OF E%. �Vi!�// �eN-
,LLC �0•�������g•���TY i0XE8,AW OTHER M18C.SITE fIXTIXtEB WILL YE � ••,'�;'4�� o��
PAfNYED,SCREENED,OR OTHERWI8E CONCBALED,OR iLENDED IN BINLDIIV6 ARCNI7ECTUIlE.
4124 Headsail DNve,New Port Richey, FI 34652 .
P: �727�488-1��2 F: (727)645-5105 20.ALL UldlSED DftIVEWAYS IMJST BE REMOVED AW REPLACW W17H CUiB,SIOEM�ALK,MO ' � _
NOtE LANDSCAPINO TO MATCM EXISTIN6 COMITIONS OR BETT6t. � �
www.SGroupfl.CO�YI 21.HXTERIOR LI6MTIN6 SFiALL i@ ATTACMED ON TME EXTERIdt Of TM8 BUILDING. '•• ..
22.TMERE ARE NO fRE6dTAlOIN6 SIGNS PROrO&!D.SIONS WII.L OE ATTACM�TO TFiE '���/J/!tl 111111�\
CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE (N ACCORDANCE WITH THE LATEST � WIlDIN6 AND PROVIDED W�pER SEPMATE SION I�tMIT AMIICATION. �
EDITIONS OF RORIDA DEPARTMENT OF 1RANSPORTATiON� �� '��T���� ��nWED�DATE EXPNtli 2J.SEE PARIfINO REDUCTION STUDY FOR D6TAIL�►ARNIN6 06MAW IIFORMATION.
ROADWAY AND TRAFFlC DESIGN STANUAROS AND dTY OF CiTY OF CIEARWA7ER ORC FLp�1p-02006 Y4.APPLICANT fMALL COMPLY W�TH THE CWRlNT TftANiPORTATION 11�ACT PHE ���R ���
CLEARWATER CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS. e�ro �Tw,i�T�RE��f�WLE qNp�AID PRIOR TO 158WNC!Of BWLDINO PERMIT OR ���� ��p�
N�8 26.AN ABESTOS SURVEY IS USUALIY REOWRlD PRItll1 TO COIAUCTINO ANY DEMOLITION OR �n., �,�
FDEP BEWER a WATER RENOVATIONB.OWNER BMALI CONTACT PINELLAS COIAfrY AIR OUALITY(727/464-442Y)FOR
oxnrEOev: m�
CtTY OF CIEARWATER R-6W MOft@ IPNORMATION.
^ 26.APPIItANT SHALL BRIN6 ALL SUB-STANDARD SIDEWALKS MO SIDEWALK RAMPS oNEEi N0.
DAT E. 0 3•� O.�L ��ENT TO OR A PART OF THE PROJBCT UP TO STAIVDARD�ING.tA1NG LATEST A.D.A. (�1 Of C6
STAWARDS FOR RAIS@D DETECTABIE SURFACES OR TRUNCATED DOMES PER fDOT INDEX
MSO4,LATE3T EOITION. v
. IV�L ENOINEERINti,PlNNITfINO
� I uiiUS�WI1eL E�D ONPE
I IEGEND
� g�
� ' �-- — — —�-PROPERTY LINE I = _��f¢�
��REMIO DINFRASTRUCTURET08E , �o �J�
� a�
� �O L
I � \ EXIBTING TREE WI DRIP LINE � ' C��LL�
, .� I TO BE REMAIN ' �p� �s �
j,�T 77 ��.i Q�� �..
EXI8TiN0 TOPOORAPMIC ' L N ��
BPOt ELEVATION � I SCALE:1": 10' � �
' ' GRAPHI¢SCALE (n �i
P' �
� p � i i �e�s�,� .
CONTRACTOR TO SAW CUT &
� REMOVE EXISTING CONCRETE (TYP.) � � � —
�—'�
I
// � � 1 � � �
I i _ \ Zz �
CONTRACTOR TO REMOVE ;�1 I� �:�� J
CONTRACTOR TO SAW CUT EXISTING COVERED AWNING & SIGNS � � ' 1'- A Z� } "
" - a REMOVE CONCRETE SLAB & � \� � �� O� 4 �
WALLS (SEE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS C O N T R A C T O R T O S A W C U T �` �i �O Z �
I FOR DESIGN & DETAILS). & REMOVE EXISTING CONCRETE I � o w a �
ENTRANCE & FACADE (SEE �:.: I �ii � �
� A R C H I T E C T U R A L P L A N S F O R � ( � � � c�
EXISTING STRUCTURE TO REMAIN DESIGN & DETAILS) � �
ONE STORY BUILDING j- � � ^�
#454
EXISTING CURB CUT & APRON � i � �W �
TO REMAIN FOR DUMPSTER a
I STAGING AREA I � 7 � W"
0 I � F�j � W �� �
� � a
CONTRACTOR TO SAW CUT & �— � � �,�,, � _ � �-� �
CONTRACTOR TO REMOVE REMOVE EXISTING CONCRETE (TYP.) � � � � � pq o0o w �a o
EXISTING VINYL FENCE (TYP.) � / � � � �� W
� I
� ��`� ' m � � o
� � j � � � � �
I �� � � � �
' � � w �
m
I 1 � �,aj �
,� � 1
I � ��
� - 1 ��
- - — � ----- - - - - I � �
f 1 �
GENERAL DEMOUTION NOTES: � � ��
I i.coNrnacroR sNau.ae aesPO�e�.e�oR a.� ( � I � �
BNVIRONMENTAL TCSTING RflWIRED MIOR TO DlMOI.IflON. �
I CONTRACTOR TO REMOVE EXISTtNG z.eor�rRncroR sHn��aenove ou e�usrria uNOeRCaourw ' � I � �w>—m— z m
COVERED AWNING (TYP.} UTILITIFS PRIOR TO iTARTINO SIT!WORK.
4.INSTAIL SILT fENC!��R MANUFACTURCRB SPCGfICATI0N5, 1 � ' ' ������"�X�������d�� N�
AND SHALL HAYE A BACKFILLlD TRENCNl0. � � � � ``�����••••�,,'�i��_o��
�."�.}� �'�j 6.CONTRACTOR TO IN5IALL TRQ!BARRICADES MtIOR TO � ' � _•?�" � '� ��` �
ISSUANCE OF BUILDIN6 PQtM1T. ( ' ' =�•
6,TN!CITY 0/CLlARWATlR,AT AMLICANT'8 E%PlNSE, '�, ��r
WIL�RBMOY!/RELOCAT!ANY/ALL WATlN METlRf, ' I '��0�•••",".••',������ a6'
INCLUOIN6 RECLAIMlD WATER ISTlRS,
I ' ' . ����/ff11�111N��`` Z��
I7•ALL PROPOCED iERVICf LINEII FOR ON-SI7![LfCTRICAL
I ' �' noccre »�m
AND COMMUNICA ION LINBS SHALL B!KACEO UNDEROROUND. ' ��a� %�"
I GENERAL NOTE: � ,„,�,�„, M
I. SEE SHEET C2 FOR GENERAL CONSTRUCTION � I ,��;: ,�
I & DEMOLiTION NOTES, I ' ( ��tT�
C3 of cs
IVIL ENGINEEHING,PEqMITTING
LAND PIANNING,Ll1NDSCAPE
_ 0 � LEGEND g T
OUTDOOR SEATING --- - ��- — — r � „o�
PLANTI NG AREA I — — — — PROPERTY LtNE /� � ���'�
«�
` � \ �� EXISTING TREE W!DRIP LINE � ���
; � . TO BE REMAIN �
�LL
I �r../ 0' r 70' ra •� �g
EXISTING TOPOGRAPHIC
SPOT ELEVATION �� ��
' I OUTDOOR SEATING SCALE:1"_ �O' F° �
` �° `'` u,NOSCnaeo,aR�, GRAPHIC SCALE (n �
ICD I -• °
I 2 �
_ . ._ �,cn
:
�,
CONTRACTOR TO INSTALL 4" THICK CONTRACTOR TO INSTALL REMOVABLE RAILING SYST 4' WIDE
CONCRETE PAD FOR DELINEATION OF OUTDOOR SEATING AREA UNOBSTRUCTED
EXISTING EXIT TO REMAIN EDESTRIAN PATH
(TYP.) w ,�
� REMOVABLE OUTDOOR CAFE' SEATING � Z Z M
,0 AREA (SEE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS � — W r�
� 27, � FOR DESIGN, DETAILS & FINISH) '4 zH- Q u.
° � —� �w g w
/ � �a o ¢
� .12' \ w� Z �
� I °> � a
— i � � I o � �
,� � ' , � / �
� ��
,
� , .
, , I
� , .
; ,, , i .:: ,. __�
I ; � � ,, � � .
- �—_ 'f.
_ �
�
�� � I� -� UNION BURGER COFFEE CULTURE � �
� ,�� � ,
� � ,, [. � �� ��� ��-�� w
� _.��_ ` . � '
,..,
� ;. �, � � �� EXISTING ONE STORY BUILDING ;�'�; I ^ �
._ I^J'i 4,296 SF 01; 6 � �' � =c'�o
� h � �� �� < i � ,� � :: � : ;; � � �� � , ,� , �, � � ,� � w wM
, � W
>J Z
. � t1 #`� ° �, �� � �� o }"- g
I � : ,� _ � � � a
� :-1 � �' `�
� � � w aQ �
. u._�' � S���;E ` L J�' � � � °z 3 cn
I ��.. i � �..... .._.... J�� �4� � . I � Q � ��
. _..._ � - � �. � ..
( - � � �� �_ —._
, � =—� . � m �
' �- _� __n� I
---- �
; ,� ��'�� i— � �` � — / I _ � � � Z � �v �
_
I � 4 Ir �
�
� 'Z (I � � �\ � aa ° W � W �
_ J_�, ,
: � '� � _
� .�
� � � �� � � ouT�ooR sEaTiN� (� � I A �,, .
�� i' �a � m �
�f , . < �
� I 1 � PLANTING AREA � I �
� ��� ►� � ��- � I � I �� �
I ..... _-- '—J I Il.�l II a I, I y
P w ., I \ I / ` �
� I aU
• ' \`� � � � �
— .
�,,,. ., f� w �
�� i ,�, o
.3 I ►.a �
�A� - _ �
_
N EXISTING PATIO AREA TO REMAIN ( I 4� WIDE �
` °' UNOBSTRUCTED � �
— _ — — — — I PEDESTRIAN PATH � -
(TYP.) �w>—�n—ozcn
. � ``���a�#�a�u�„� w
�..3� ���� ...'R�ii�� o��
DUMPSTER STORAGE Q ;�t?;-�' � •�% o��
� o ROOM � �
` ;. . �;�_ �
o =��� � � ���;���
I %,�i•...._..� .� ��
��I����//I�'p1"`\��\��� �ym
ROLL-OUT DUMPSTER I �
STAGING AREA (TYP.) _ _.. P���.. z,,�
I GENERAL NOTE: ��a�"`°"'� °,'°"
CIECI(FA BY: M
PLANT UST: I. SEE COVER SHEET FOR SITE DATA TABLE & NOTES. �„o„�o�, ,�
SVMBOL y,p, SCIENTIFICNAME COMMONNaME MIN.SI2EREQUIREMENTS I 2. SIGN PACKAGE TO BE SUBMITTED UNDER SEPARATE �,
COVER. BHEEi NO.
IICD 4 IXORA COCCINEA DWARF IXORA 7 GAL,18"HT,24"O.C. ��} Of C6 ��
EXISTING F�RE HYDRANT LOCATION MAP ���LENGINEERINO,PEPMITTING
� � —�� INTERCtPTOF C�LL SIZING CNART LANDPLANNING,LANDBCAPE
, .�o� � a E EXISTING I
caa�r eo*�socs aci, L___ __J � � � �N
T �. ,so , o� <_a o a�� s_„- FIRE HYDRANT ___ --- s�
� ( O�000 y-o� s-a� a z- �-�o'� � SAN MARCO ST. i � Ji
� ����ET «E.R.«ESS LOCATION ---__—__ ----- — �
� OPENiNG O 0'JT:—ET �350 9'-0' S'-0' ]'-]' S-1' a-�D� � � ��� 1 E$
� ��,. ! cENCRn�Nores: �' P Fa0 ',--" -- I ^ �N�
P�' �FE � � y
.'�, cacc<s,s�r�E.-,wcK �� i. me���e�ceotor sys�em may co�s�st or mwupie��n�e,�P�r�� I 1 j��y,�SS'N.�ON � ._— i ' (� �
I SaMPLINC �a o vea greater tnan 125o gm�on copnCdy � � �,�pµP�GO ��i �'��, � � � u:�
cell c u
i re ��
� CELL 2. Dna 9
' amo� y oeu Pe�system snau be��=taned a����rau NM C
�-- � � � � (IF ftEOUIRED) to n y'f requ red. , �'P /� � � I 10' � �g
INTERCEPTOR sio*eo*N sioes 3. Con rete wali coat ng tak ng nto 'a tl n he I � �/ I � \� T � �
wa�e, o�m. PROJECT , � , � � > , , , ; s ,a � �o
CELL 4. C t actor to suOPly&' t II II po 9 d o,� ry \ ,,,..�,�,... � gy
PLAN VIEW � �ieo� o�ts�or i �.g�w a y r . LOCATION I �V �� � � � � a � -� � 6�
vmes cri, � 5. C� t� tor nau oss�� 2 5o P., m n m.,m.�i oear�n � ����'�"'� � Q�� P � � �
nie��ca�iue x avca o g° F �J 1 \/ �
OP OF COG R iD MnTNN � /� � �( � / � �
������>��' E. � R.oFmAw� -� �.—s" oR �nRCER <�oo�ny�eeaa��g<�e�a�o� � �e� P � %� �» GRAPHIC�SCALE (f� �
V �eaE.PF��,��E p�°F Q� o
"°TES: / � I"�'--� oo�`g�'�t�� p�� � g _. �..
�� i. co�c t�. asooP �za y. � / �� i i � +N � \ �4
� OU1�Ei TO Z Reb ' ASTM A615 G d 6�. � � � � y� ����� 1 -.,. �
HsPCCra SANITARV 3 Mesh: ASiM A815 G d F EXISTING _ � �' / � ��
N�ET <.oes A�3,a 83 B �d �aP�,.M -s��M�,.,�, - � .� , I �. �, , LEGEND ,.(n
�, � """ �`""�R � 9 � �9 9.��� FIRE HYDRANT � '
MAIN 5� t al D L for�n�er d � � � i 1
i 2 a�e�as�con«ete uru�iY_���w�es � 1 ' _�,�r � 1
i' — s. �ooas� N-zo t���k wneeis w/3o���mpo�i oe�ansNr�
__� �
-� -�- .. e. r�n w/oiea�wa�e�v��o�to start�P or syscem. � LOCATION � �_ �__ , J - - - -pROPERTVLINE
C �SAMPLING �� Gray water only,black water sM1a�l be c�rrletl bY ������������������ ��� ����� ��t
separote sewer. '
_PAPAYA STREET �
i E aatcnst earr�c ��'I .�(IF REOUiRE�) p , ��+
_ ^����� GREASE INTERCEPTOR -"—�- T
\ EXISTING TREE W/ORIP LINE
_ �
'--'----�'-_' _.--._"_- ._1. .1_ � � TO BE REMAIN W I�
-r' T � � 7c50�NOEx2�50 GALioO� _'� � � z Z r�i
0 3° �—� �
�_ . —.i N,TS.
r — � M
INTERCEPTOR x�
ceu ! ciTV ov e�enewarea, noeioa EXISTING TOPOGR4PHIC }� Q LL
I �LENGTH— �L�NGTH I--� � � ENCINEERING DEPARTMENT I � �a.
SPOT ELEVATION Z Z }
GREASE �TF, fP'f04 � � �V,J
;�Cr,CN �,i�W >i��i, E �w- so cnc�o,v �;. �� � W
:o a' I
.r �SD.S� B O`ua.
�� z �
a
/� � � �W � �
\ � o � �
_ � ���
N������,��� � I ��
�� � ��
� y ,�
c� , �
, � �� _ � _��� � � �
k �
���� ��� ���, '� i� � / � .:
y' F \�- — � MATCH EXISTING �
,ti ��� ��''I ��_ 1 '� -�� '�� ' "-� � w� w
I � p �r 1� �� �_� GRADE v Z M �Z
� UNION BURGER COFFEE CULTURE � W >J
� EXISTING ONE STORY BUILDING
CONTRACTOR TO MATCH EXISTING 4,296 SF __ X � o }� ��
GRADES (5.Og'o MAX. LONGITUDINAL ' � _ � •> � �'�� ���' '� � a~ �J
IJ i�v � � � ^� WU' �� O�
�;�v.�,r= SLOPE & 2.09'o CROSS SLOPE - TYP) II � � (�i � ? �� �,�
PLUMBING CONTRACTOR TO ROUTE PIPE FROM GREASE TRAP � W m � � c�
TO EXISTING SANITARY SEWER LATERAL � � � -L-1 � p � �v v �
� � � ;_, (SEE MECHANICAL PLANS "-� W z �
� • � �I, � ��� �� � ( _ FOR DESIGN, SLOPE & DETAILS) � •�� � �j p�q � � �
' � � m �
_ � � � �
� i�, �" � � �' d –
'- ��
�I � � � r�a ° �
'� � ' ! MATCH EXISTING `-' W
' � �
i ��' I��� �� _ � � GRADE �� I � � �
,:w�.m�.,
_. __ I�'.�� � �� y �I �� I .. I� W �
i
l �
I
� I ' I � , a. ° � � ° �
� I�I I � � �
r
� \�� ��� .,� Rll N
���� -_- _._ W a a
� � � � o �
__�, ,
�<<;;,:�; ' �� i � v � �
I „� � — I - -- '��-�� �r�'i �,� , � ; �w>—<n—oz�n
o„ � � � - (� ' , � � i
i , i�Ai ``````������*�������,/' o
' EXISTING •--•-.
��
ROLL-OUT DUMPSTER =�,� � ��" o��
— — — — — — STAGING AREA TO -��; � �� �•'��_��
APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF GREASE INTERCEPTOR REMAIN (TYP.) ''�•••-•--••-'�'� �#�
PER CITY OF CLEARWATER INDEX #307 ��°j''�nr;,°n��•�`� �ym
� (SEE MECHANICAL PLANS FOR DESIGN, I EXISTING I" WATER METER g
SLOPE & DETAILS) � P��"r �„�
I GENERAL NOTE: ; � � TO REMAIN ����^�a� �,m,�
I. SEE SHEET C2 FOR GENERAL CONSTRUCTION, GRADING & `"��`�a"' ""
DRAINAGE, ANO uTiuTY NoTes. CONTRACTOR TO CONNECT SERVICE LINE INTO PROPOSED GR ASE � °�a'°"�°"' ""
TRAP (SEE MECHANICAL PLANS FOR DESIGN, SLOPE & DETAIL ) � '"EET"°.
C5 or es �i
PARKING ANALYSIS FOR UNION BURGER and
CO�FEE CULTURE at 454 MANDALAY AVENUE
CLEARWATER BEACH, FLORIDA 33767
P�EPARED BY:
THE SUSTAINABILIT�( GROUP, LLC
4124 HEADSAIL DRIVE
NEW PORT RICHEY, FL4RIDA 34652
March 12, 2012
TABLE OF CONTENTS
INTRODUCTfON ............................................................................................................ 2-3
METHODOLOGY ............................................................................................................ 3-4
DATA COLLECTION &ANALYSIS .................................................................................. 4-6
CONCLUSION ............................................................................................................ 6
APPENDIX
A�riai Map of Project Loca#ion ................................................................................... i
Map of Clearwater Beach Parking Facilities ......................................................... ii
Tables1A, 2A&3A ................................................................................................ iii
Tabies16, 2B&36 ................................................................................................ iv
Tables1C, 2C&3C ........................................................................... . ................ v
Table1,Table 2&Table 3 ................................................................................... vi
Graph 1 "
.......................................................................................................................... vi�
1. INTRODUCTION
The project site is located at 4S4 Mandalay Avenue, between Papaya Street and San Marco
Street. Previously,the site was home to the Beach Bar. The proposed improvements witi
transform the interior and exterior of the building to contain a combination dine-in
estabiishment for Union Burger and Coffee Culture(UB&CC). Speci�cally,the building
modi�cations will yield the following:
Total Bidng sf =4,296 Union Burger Indoor Dining =42 seats
Kitchen sf =2,288 Coffee Culture Indoor Dinin� =41 seats
Dining sf = 1,245 Total Indoor Dining =83 seats
Possible Outdoor Dining Total =48 seats
Operating hours are tentatively from 10:00 AM to 10:00 PM,Monday through Sunday,
with 5 employees.
5imilar to the previous business(Beach 8ar),and other businesses along this part of the
Mandalay strip, no private off street parking is provided for patrons. Due to the project's
unique location along Mandalay,and within the Tourist(T)zoning district,the clientele will
be tourists,local workers,beach residents,and beach visitors. Essentially,the business
model for this development is based upon capture of existing peslestrian traffic. As
discussed with City staff,and again,due to the project's loeation, Union Burger and CoffeE
Culture are not"destination locations"; hence,the project is not a trip generator, per se.
Per the Community Development Code,Section 2-802,a minimum of 7 to 15{�arking spaces
is required per 1,000 square feet of restaurant gross floor area (GFAj. Based upon 4,296
GFA,this equates to a requirement of 30 to 64 parking spaces. Prior beach parking studies
indicate approxima#ely 509'a of clients actually drive to an establishment;whereas the
remaining 50%are iRdividuais who are already staying,visiting,etc.,on Clearwater Beach.
The aforementioned calculation is shown below:
5096 of max parking spaces=0.50 x 64 spaces=32 spaces
The City's Community Development Code recognizes the special and unique situations
inherent within Clearwater Beach,and,pe�Section 2-802 of the Code,allows for reductions
in parking if the project requires fewer parking spaces per floor area than would otherwise
be required or,if sufficient existing parking or planned and committed parking is available
within 1,000 feet of the project.
The City of Clearwater,through its vision and future planning for Clearwater Beach,
acknowledges the very significant element of"pedestrian traffic capture"as clientele for the
retail estabiishments on the beach that are located within walking distance to public
parking,street parking, residences,and resorts. 7he City atso recogni2es that availability of
convenient parking serves beach goers,provides parking for businesses,and certain
businesses act to capture beach visitors with little, if any,effect on the beach parking
demands. This analysis evaluates the parking availability within the projecYs vicinity.
II. METHODOLOGY
The methodology meeting with City Staff resulted in the performance of the folfowing tasks:
• Obtaining the operational hours and employee shift data for UB&CC.
• Conducting a campa�ison study of two(2)businesses with similar characteristics.
Green Apple Yogurt was selected for comparison to Coffee Culture and Frenchy's
5outh Beach was selected for comparison to Union Burger.
• Performing a parking analysis of parking facilities located within 1,000 feet of the
UB&CC project.
• This parking study is revised to eliminate the currently available parking within Lot#
63,and to account for the parking demand of the Walgreens that is to be
constructed within Lot#63.
As in previous beach parking studies, it is estimated that 809�a of employees require a
parking space and the remaining 20%arrive by other means such as walking, biking,Jolly
Trolley, rides to work,etc. Prior beath studies/surveys,estimate that 509'0 of customers
drive to the site area while#he other 5090 are people who are vacationing/staying at the
beach, beachgoers, local residents,employees of other businesses wi#hin the beach,etc. In
reality,for a business such as UB&CC, it is very reasonable to estimate the vast majority of
customers(80 9�to 909'0,or mare)are attributable to peopie alreaciy at the beach whasE
secondary, if not tertiary visit, is to UB&CC.
As previously mentioned,within 1,000 feet of the project,a parking accumufation study was
performed on Friday,Saturday,and Sunday from 10:00 AM to 4:00 PM and 6:00 PM to
10:00 PM. The areas studied inctude on-street parking along Mandalay Avenue from the
roundabout to Baymont Street,on-street parking along San Marco,on-street parking along
Papaya,on-street parking along Baymont,and public parking Lot Nos. 34,35,43�a�fr3�
The aforementioned areas yield a total of 171 parking spaces. Table A below lists the
parking spaces per area.
TABLE A...Total Available Parking�thin 1,000 feet
LOCATION No.of Parkin�Spaces
Lot#34 23
Lot#35 25
Lot#43 31
Papaya Street 7
Baymont Street 32
San Marco Street 4
Mandalay Ave 39
Total No.of Spaces 171
Concurrently with the parking study,a customer pattern study was performed—during the
same days and times-for�renchy's South Beach and Green Apple Yogurt. Below is the
square footage and available seating for Frenchy's and Green Apple.
French s
• 3,273 GFA(from Pineilas County property appraiser's website)
• 140 indoor and outdoor seats
Green Apple
• 1,100 GFA(based upon site visit and estimation from aerial)
• 18 indoor seats
III. DATA COLLECTION&ANALYSIS, FrenchV's South Beach
For the following discussion, please refer to TABLE 2.
Frenchy's is located on the beach, immediately adjacent to the east side of Beach Walk,and has a
GFA of 3,273 sf with 140 total indoo�&outdoor seats. Frenchy's was chosen as its characteristics
may be comparable to Union Burger. Frenchy's has five(5)parking spaces in the rear. One space is
alwa�s dedicated for the managers parking,and at most two(2)spaces are occupied by the
managers,but only during a shift change. The remaining three(3)spaces are for patron parking.
Due to its parking limitations,the maximum number of patron-occupied parking spaces was four(4),
and this occurred on Saturday at approximately 7:00 PM.
The maximum number of customers was 85 at 7:00 PM on Saturday(which coincided with
maximum occupied customer parking spaces,4(four). Due to its location and pa�king limitations, it
is expected the majority of customers would walk to Frenchy's. Interviews and discussions with the
managers and staff reveal the vast majority of clientele are walk-up customers whose primary
purpose was to visit the beach and visitors/vacationers who are already staying on the beach. There
is also a contingent af repeat local customers who mostly walk to Frenchy's. There is a smaller
segment of clientele that parks and then wa�ks to Frenchy's; however,due to the location and
distance of the parking areas,this segment was not readily quantifiable.
Based upon the maximum number of observed customers(85)at 7:00 pm on Saturday,the
maximum observed occupancy rate is:
j85 customers)( 1009�0) = 61%
140 seats
Union Burger has 42 seats and would approximately utilize half of the total outdoor seats(50%of 48
outdoor seats=24);thQrefore,applying the above 61%rate to Union Burger,yieltls:
(61�'0)(42+24)=40 occupied seats
DATA COLLECTION&ANALYSIS.Green Apple Frozen Yo�urt
For the following discussion, please refer to TABLE 1.
Green Appie Frozen Yogurt is loc8ted at 460 Mandalay Avenue,within the s�me strip center as the
proposed UB&CC. Green Apple was chosen as its characteristics may be comparable to Coffee
Culture. Green Apple has approximately 1,100 sf of GFA along with a total of 18 seats. Per TABLE 1,
the maximum number of patrons was 10 at 1:00 PM on Saturday. Similar to other stores within this
strip along Mandalay Avenue,Green Apple does not provide any off street parking. The only
available parking is in the rear of the building,and this parking is reserved for one(1)employee of
Green Apple. Green Apple requires only one(1)emptoyee per shift. 1'nterviews and discussions with
the store manager reveal the clientele is basically composed entirely of walk-up customers. The
manager explicitly stated he was not aware of anyone who drove to his location for the sole purpose
of visiting his store. This theme of walk-up customers was also corroborated by the manager of the
adjacent retail store, Freaky Tiki. The manager of Freaky Tiki indicated F�e was not aware of anyone
who would drive explicitly to this area for the express purpose of visiting his store. Rather,he said
his business was more affected by weather and seasonality—noting that ':...on nice,sunny days, we
get more peop/e coming in ou�store. People just like to come, visit the beach, and then, if they want,
they come by and browse."
Based upon the maximum number of observed customers(10)at 1:00 PM on Friday,the maximum
observed occupancy rate is:
(10 customersl(1009�0) = SfiR�o
18 seats
Coffee Culture has 41 seats and would approximately utilize half of the total outdoor seats(509'0
of 48 seats=24);therefore,applying the above 56%rate to Coffee Culture,yields:
(569'0)(41+24)=36 oCCUpied seats
From the above for UB and CC,the maximum total seat occupancy is:
36 seats from Coffee Culture+40 seats from Union Burger=76 total seats for UB&CC
DATA COLLECTION&ANALYSIS. Parkin�1.000 feet within Union Bur�er&Coffee Culture
Please refer to TABLES 1A, iB, 1C,2A,2B,2C,3A,3B,3C&GRAPH 1 for the following discussion.
The parking space capacity was observed on Friday,Saturday,and Sunday from 10:00 AM to 10:00
PM. Sunday was chosen for observation as it historically presents the maximum parking space
demand day. It was expected that Sunday would exhibit the maximum demands on parking
capacity. Tfie parking analysis�ndings are summarized below:
Fridav,Januarv 27.2012
Please refer to TABLE 2A and GRAPH 1. Friday exhibited good parking availability throughout the
day. The highest parking demand occurred from 7:00 PM to 9:00 PM; however,accounting for the
propos�d Walgreens parking demand and eliminating the parking currently available within Lot#63
indicates parking capacity is at the maximum for the aforementioned time frame. tn this case, no
vacant spaces are available from 7:00 PM until 9:00 PM.
SaturdaY,Januarv 27.2012
Please refer to tABLE 2B and GRAPH 1. Saturday exhibited goad parking avaitability throughout the
day;though,there were not as many vacant spaces as the previous day, Friday. This is expected as
Saturday provides a full day for local/regional beach goers to drive to the beach. Again,the highest
parking demand was observed between 6:00 PM until 9:00 PM. Accounting for the proposed
Walgreens parking demand and eliminating the parking currently available within Lot#63 indicates
parking capacity is at the maximum for the aforementioned time frame. In this case, no vacant
spaces are available from 2:00 PM until 9:00 PM.
Sundav.January 27.2012
Please refer to TABLE 2C and GRAPH 1. As expected,Sunday exhibited the largest parking demand
of the days studied. Sunday is traditionally the favorite"beach day"for beach goers. The highest
parking demand was observed from 12:00 PM until 8:00 PM. Accounting for the proposed
Walgreens parking demand and eliminating the parking currently available wi#hin Lot#63 indicates
parking capacity is at the maximum for the aforementioned time frame. In this case, no vacant
spaces are available from 12:00 PM until 8:00 PM. Sunday's parking demand may have been
exacerbated by the remaining Gasparilla Day visitors,who,after celebrating Gasparilla on Saturday,
visited,or stayed at the beach the following Sunday.
IV. CONCLUSION
Though there have been many improvements to the parking situation of Clearwater Beach,and the
benefits are noticeable,there continue to b�time windows within peak days during which parking
availability(defined as vacant spaces within a certain distance to a location)will be stressed to
capacity. This is shown within the data for Sunday.Although both of the following locales are
greater than 1,000 ft from tMe subject property,there are sufficient parking spaces available within
both Aqualea and Surf Style. Both Aqualea and Surf Style are closer to the actual beach areas;
hence,a detailed observation may reveal the impacts to parking spaces located within 1,000 feet of
the subject site may not be that adverse during peak times/season.
An in-depth, prolonged seasonal study of beach visitors and beach resident's habits will likely reveal
that the{�ercentage of"v�ralk-up"customers for certain busin�.sses ma�bP mu�h hi$her than the
accepted"50%ruie." In reality, Union Burger and Coffee Culture are neither"trip generators" nor
"destination locations"that add to the parking demands of Clearwater Beach. Rather, Union Burger
and Coffee Culture are the types of businesses that support and encourage the activities of locals,
residents,and beach visitors who are already in Clearwater Beach.Combining the aforementioned
with this parking analysis—and the nature/type of businesses that are Union Burger&Coffee
Culture- leads to the very reasonable conctusion that adequate parking exists within the vicinity of
the project.
I
Notes
mapquest�
Map of:
454 Mandalay Ave �
Clearwater Beach, FL 33767-2046 �
� �� �� ��� , � � ,�,.�,W�,�., ,�„I.,�,,, , , �
'�YV:?1���ef r c I i i ,
� y ,�,.� ' � 1 ''��,, i I '�I�I
�,�;�.; .� ��
� ' � ,� � r
t ����
-,.�
i� `"� �� fi�"7 `{
� '
�r �V.,I���}I Illi� il'I I
:�� �a �..,�....
f�r s.
Y'
�" .....'�P
3 Ry
��
. , . . , .. . d�:'.. I
..�:. ��� f ;" �
A ���iyyy
� � ... 9k.c . ... ..,. .. .r..... � I I II
� YN ,
��
i � 4�
..... . . � ..
�� Y4»�,�i' .� �I .� I �F� � `�
^A
f1 r »
V
� �r*
.a
� , y„q�
� � ' . rA-, alr'.
� � ��f.� ��� . � ` ♦
������ .d���
rv ..
� a
�
s .
x K ��� �
� � ;� rW.« �, '� �,..». 11
v
, � � , � . • �� �t
a�r _m . �'r . .�. : - m�wa .
.r. : r rd� . , . ,
�
. � � ��
�
, .. . . � r�-.,�—Y
• �
.
' '
r*�,� , �,„ . < ,�*
�.
� ,. � �°+� , a ^ �� �.
a . _ .
�Yak �� ap' ,�'* �+7�k � `s�w�,+�ra�;�„� R•'+* �..�
.—
,: " ,� .
� � _��_ +w. �}ii �� � ••'•;�'Ar •
� ,�w�, �J e �
��a._.._,.�:�w._.__ ..� ,� �.; � - ' ;, �'�
fT'1+r7�C�UE� ��, "�' z".S'_}..�.___.._ ... •.'a "� .+ . 15�� � . .#+' � ,�r�"'+ �, .ra'r �° �pp�
��.�n �" ` � � I �.' �'14�1�
. . . . _.,,.� .a r.�.'��� , _...W . ,,. . i�,�. „�
�02011 MapQuest,Inc.Use of directions and maps is subject to the MapQuest Terms of Use.We make no guarantee of the accuracy of their content,road
conditions or route usability.You assume all risk of use.View Terms of Use_
1DLE1MLD � CITY PARKING LOTS
39 sT
17 Spaces * GLENDALE Hourly Rates
� (Daily Rates)
S WAY O Lot Location **Sat-Sun Hours of After
NORT�I H�""� � No. Mon-Fri & Enforcement Hours
� Seasonal
Not to Sr,ale 37
� o� MARINA
53 Spaces '" A ST < N , � 30 25 Causeway Blvd. �0.75 $1.00 ACTIVITIES Cha ge
�. �ITA ONLY 8am-6pm
WAY
sr = �+ Pier 60 $1.50 �2.00
e�r 31* 7am-lam Closed
36 160 S.Gulfview Blvd. ($10.00) ($12.50)
145 Spaces * 32* 332 S.Gulfview Blvd. $2.�5 �2.�5 7am-iam Closed
($16.00) ($16.00)
O 38 33* 212 Hamden Dr. $1.00 $1.25 6am-lipm Closed
� p = 34* 429 Mandalay Ave. $1.00 $1.25 8am-6pm No
Rocic�wnr 79 S aces Charge
� sr � 35* 457 Mandalay Ave. $1.00 $1.25 Sam-6pm C arge
W 36* 4 Rockaway St. $1.00 $1.25 6am-lam Closed
� BAYMONT � 37* Avalon-Kendall �1.00 �1.25 8am-10pm No
6 Avalon S� Charge
'ti ilam-6pm
35 sua � Family Aquatic Center gam 6pm No
M �,' 38* &Recreation Center $1.00 $1.25 ��t&Holidays) Charge
25 Spaces � 51 Bay Esplanade 12:30pm-6pm
N (Sun)
34 V McKa Field No
PAPAYA sr 63 39* 605 Mandalay Ave. �1.00 �1.25 8am-30pm Charge
23 Spaces
33 Spaces * 43* 390/1 Eas S ore Dr. �1.00 $1.25 8am-6pm C a ge
� � ` 63* 400 E.Shore Dr. �1.00 $1.25 gam-6pm No
'`L <I � ($10.00) ($12.50) Charge
O � a 43 On Street Parking �1.00 $1.25 Varies
/ ^ a (265 spaces)
p�F I 41 Spaces * Accepts-vsa/Master Card/American Express
�60 �O __
I.VlSA `'. � �
**Seasonal Rate-March throu gh A pril eve tyda y
31 ��
139 Spaces * Notes: -Does not include Handicap or ■�
1VIARIN � �, Reserved Spaces ��
o�sfo``�qP� -Information Subject to Change r '
y
� ��h��a°a'��G �
30 a �J�qy �
� �� 33 348 Spaces
� 24 Spaces MARINA ACTNITIES LEGEND:
� ONLY(8am-6pm) � City Park =
(� Public Beach
r� �� � City Parking Lot ■�
V °f�qy � Private Parking Lot-Open to Public �
4s:�A �-- ♦�♦ Private Parking Garage-Open to Publie L
� �`e� � On Street Parking /R
� Oversize Vehicle Parking A�r
S °�; Private Parking (24'-40'only) ii
� � o Open to Public General Parking Information V
N �
(727) 562-4704 �
eRU�.' "," oR"� Parking System Hotline m
Fl ST cz.E�R��TF, (727) 562-4892
L
� ( l [ A R W A T E A F l O A � � A �
= BA��oE F�(�. CH WA =,K �
°R'� "� ' '
., .-:•
v �H�I�B O I� "
32 , S ° Clearwater �w'
224 Spaces � .�--�, �y
�'c�. 8 U `..,�`��'' �
�� C�s- ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT V
\ "
www.myClearwater.com
Friday-January 27.2Qt2 from 10:00 AM to 10:00 PM(no readings from 4:00 PM to 6:00 PM)
TABLE 1A
Time Maodalay Avenue Street Parking Minor Street Parking Total No.of
of (Roundabout to Baymontj (Papaya,San Marco&Baymart) Vacant
Day Spaces TABLE ZA
Parking Occupied Vacaot Parlcing Occupisd Vacant
Capacity Spaces 3paces Capacily Spaces Spaces Time otal No.of Vacant Parking Spaces Within
�l of s ces) #of s es of Da Public Parkin lots and 3treet Parlcfin
10:00 AM 39 S 31 43 3 40 71 10:00 AM 101
11:00 AM 39 11 28 43 5 38 66 11:00 AM 94
12:00 PM 39 14 25 43 10 33 58 12:00 PM 76
1:00 PM 39 14 25 43 17 26 51 1:00 PM 69
2:00 PM 39 21 18 43 23 20 38 2:00 PM 53
3:00 PM 39 17 22 43 21 22 44 3:00 PM 58
4:00 PM 39 13 26 43 17 26 52 4:00 PM 67
6:00 PM 39 20 19 43 25 18 37 6:00 PM 34
7:00 PM 39 29 10 43 31 12 22 7:00 PM 15
8:00 PM 39 26 13 43 32 11 24 8:00 PM 27
9:00 PM 39 27 12 43 30 13 25 9:00 PM 26
10:00 PM 39 25 14 43 25 18 32 10:00 PM 40
TABLE 3A...Public Parking Lot Capacity(Lot Nos.34,35,43)MINUS Waig�sen's Parking Demand
Time Lot#34 Occupied Vacant Lot#35 Occupied Yacant Lot#43 Occupied Vacant Walgreens' Tatai No.of
of Capaclty 8paces Spaces Capacity Spaces Spaces Capacity Spaces Spaces Demand Vacant
Da (#of s ces) #of spaces (#W s ces) (#of s cea► S ces
10:00 AM 23 1 22 25 0 25 41 3 38 55 30
11:00 AM 23 '! 22 25 1 24 41 4 37 55 28
12:00 PM 23 2 21 25 2 23 41 4 37 63 18
1:00 PM 23 3 20 25 2 23 41 3 38 63 18
2:00 PM 23 4 19 25 4 21 41 3 38 63 15
3:00 PM 23 4 19 25 1 24 41 7 34 63 44
4:00 PM 23 3 20 25 2 23 41 6 35 63 15
� � � -�
� .� .r. �� ���.= F� ���� _., .. �- � �,���_� __ �_
6:00 PM "23 3 n � 20' 25 21 4 47 5 36 63 -3�
7:00 PM 23 9 14 25 17 8 41 7 34 63 -7
8:00 PM 23 6 17 25 14 11 41 3 38 63 3
9:00 PM 23 7 16 25 14 11 41 4 37 63 1
10:00 PM 23 7 16 25 13 12 41 4 37 57 8
Saturday-Janusry 28,2012 from 10:00 AM to l0:00 PM(no readings from 4:00 PM to 6:00 PM)
TABLE 1 B
Time Mandalay Avenue Street Parking Minor Street Parking Total No.of
of (Roundabout to Baymont} (Papaya,San Marco 8 8aymor�t) Vacant
Day Spaces TABLE 26
Parking Occupied VacaM Parkfng ccupied Vacarrt
Cspacity Spaces Spaces Capacity Spaces Spaces Time Total Mo.of Vacar�t Parking Spaces Within
#ot s ces� (#of ces) of Da Publk Parkin I.o�s and Street Parkin
10:00 AM 39 11 28 43 5 38 66 10:00 AM 94
11:00 AM 39 13 26 43 8 35 61 1 t:00 AM 87
12:00 PM 39 14 25 43 14 29 54 12:00 PM 59
1:00 PM 39 15 24 43 23 20 44 1:00 PM 49
2:00 PM 39 28 11 43 32 11 22 2:00 PM 18
3:00 PM 39 29 10 43 29 14 24 3:80 PM 9
4:00 PM 39 19 20 43 17 26 46 4:00 PM 27
6:00 PM 39 32 7 43 36 7 14 6:00 PM 0
7:00 PM 39 37 2 43 41 2 4 7:00 PM 0
8:00 PM 39 33 6 43 39 4 10 B:flO PM 0
9:00 PM 39 16 23 43 22 21 44 9:00 PM 30
10:00 PM 39 12 27 43 17 26 53 10:00 PM 58
TABLE 3B...Pubiic Parking Lot Capacity(Lot Nos.34,36,43)MINUS Walgreen's Parking Demand
7ime Lot#34 Occupied Vacant Lot#35 Occupied Vaca�t Lot#43 Occupied Vacant Walgreens' Totai No.of
of Capacity Spaces Spaces Capacity Spaces 3paces Capacity Spaces Spaces Demand Vacarrt
Da #of s ces) #of spaces) {A�of s ces) {#of s ces S ces
10:00 AM 23 2 21 25 1 24 41 3 38 55 28
11:00 AM 23 3 20 25 1 24 41 4 37 55 26
12:00 PM 23 8 15 25 3 22 41 10 31 63 5
1:00 PM 23 8 15 25 2 23 41 11 30 63 5
2:00 PM 23 10 13 25 10 15 41 10 31 63 -4
3:00 PM 23 13 10 25 9 16 41 19 22 63 -15
4:00 PM 23 14 9 25 13 12 41 18 23 63 -19
6:00 PM 23 16 7 25 17 8 41 25 16 63 -32
7:00 PM 23 18 5 25 24 1 41 12 29 63 -28
8:00 PM 23 18 5 25 25 0 41 11 30 63 -28
9:Od PM 23 12 11 25 20 5 41 8 33 63 -14
10:00 PM 23 7 16 25 15 10 41 5 36 57 5
Sunday-January 29,2012 from 10:00 AM to 10:00�M(no readin�from 4:00 PM to 6:00 PM)
TABLE 1 C
Time Mandalay Avenue Street Parking Minor Street Parking Total No.of
cf (Roundabout to Baymo�rt) (Papaya,San Marco�Baymoirt) Vacant
Day Spac�s TABLE 2C
Parking Occupied Vacarrt Parking Occupied Vacant
Capacity Spaces Spaces Capacity Spaces Spaces Time Total No.of Vacant Parking Spaces Within
#of s es #of s ) of Pub11c Parkin Lob and Street Parkin
10:00 39 11 28 43 6 37 6v 10:00 AM 87
11:00 AM 39 18 21 43 10 33 54 11:00 AM 70
12:Od PM 39 28 11 43 31 12 23 12:00 PM 13
1:00 PM 39 34 5 43 43 0 5 1:00 PM 0
2:00 PM 39 39 0 43 43 0 0 2:00 PM 0
3:00 PM 39 39 0 43 43 0 0 3:00 PM 0
4:p0 PM 39 35 4 43 32 11 15 4:00 PM 0
6:00 PM 39 28 11 43 29 14 25 8:00 PM 2
7:00 PM 39 24 15 43 26 17 32 7:00 PM 18
8:00 PM 39 29 10 43 39 4 14 5:00 PM 10 �
9:00 PM 39 17 22 43 9 34 56 9:00 PM 56
10:00 PM 39 13 26 43 5 38 64 10:00 PM 80
TABLE 3C...Public Parking Lot Capacity(Lot Nos.34,35,43)MINUS Walgrsen's Parking Uemand
Time Lot#34 Occupied Vacar�t Lot�35 Occupied Vacant Lo##43 Occupied Vacant Walgreens' Total No.of
o# Capacity Spaces Spaces Capacity Spaces Spaces Capacity Spaces Spaces Demand Vacant
Da (#of s ces) (#oi s ces) �of s ces (*of spaces) S ces
10:00 23 4 19 25 0 25 41 8 33 55 22
11:00 AAA 23 6 17 25 8 17 41 4 37 55 16
12:00 23 10 13 25 10 15 41 16 25 63 -10
1:00 PM 23 17 6 25 21 4 41 27 74 63 -39
2:00 PM 23 19 4 25 23 2 41 32 9 63 -48
3:00 PM 23 21 2 25 24 1 41 35 6 63 -54
4:00 P 23 16 7 25 16 9 41 33 8 63 -39
8:00 PM 23 13 10 25 15 10 41 21 20 63 -23
7:00 23 11 12 25 15 10 41 14 27 63 -14
8:00 PM 23 8 15 25 12 13 41 10 31 63 -4
9;00 PM 23 7 16 25 10 15 41 7 34 63 2
10:00 PM 23 6 18 25 7 18 41 4 37 57 16
TABLE 1...Friday-January 27,2012 from 70:00 AM to 10:00 PM(no readings from 4:00 PM to 6:00 PM�
Frenchy's South Beach-S15 S GufWlew,Clearwater Beach Grean Apple Frozen YoguR-460 Mandalay Avenue
Time No.of No.of Parking No.of Employee No.of Patron Vacant No.of No.of No.of No.of Employes No.of
of Employees 8peces Occupied Oceupied Parki�ry Bicycles Patrons Employees Vehicles Patmns
Da Ca S S ces S ces
10:00 AM 6 5 1 0 4 3 0 CLOSED CLOSED CLOSED
11:00 AM 6 5 1 1 3 3 8 CLOSED CLOSED CLOSED
12:00 PM 6 5 1 1 3 3 22 1 1 0
1:00 PM 6 5 1 1 3 3 33 1 1 70
2:00 PM 6 5 1 2 2 3 28 1 1 8
3:00 PM 6 5 1 2 2 3 29 1 1 4
4:00 PM 6 5 1 1 3 5 13 1 1 0
6:00 PM 6 5 2 3 0 3 26 1 1 4
7:00 PM 6 5 1 3 7 2 34 1 1 5
8:00 PM 8 5 7 3 1 2 32 1 1 7
9:00 PM 6 5 1 2 2 2 20 CLOSED CLOSED CLOSED
10:00 PM 6 5 1 2 2 2 18 CLOSED CLOSED CLOSED
Durfng Frenchya chanpe ot shNqbetween 6 PM to B PM),there are 72 empbyees. After the ahiR change,the employee crnmt drops back dovm to 6.
French�s has a small rear parkotg lot with b spaces.At most,two spaces are plloMred fior managers.The remaining spaces are tor patro�.
The Gresn Appia openad aftsr 11 AM and closed at 9PM an Frlday,January 27,2012.Per agreemeM writh iheir Iandbrd,Ttie Graen Apple Is ellotted one
W►kio9 sWce behind tlteir bulding.
TABLE 2...Saturday-January 28.2012 irom 70:00 AM to 70:00 PM(no readings from 4:00 PM to 8:00 PM)
Frenchy's South Beach-S75 S GuHview,Clearwater Beaeh Green Apple Frozen YoguR-460 Mandalay Avenue
Time No.of No.of Parking No.of Employee No.of Patron Vacant No.of No.oT No.of No.of Employee No.of
of Empbyeea 3paces Oeeupied OccupNd Parking Bkyeks Patronm Employeas Vehklea Patrona
Da Ca c S ees S cos S c�
10:00 AM 6 5 1 0 4 2 0 1 1 1
11:00 AM 6 5 1 0 4 3 0 1 1 1
12:00 PM 6 5 1 0 4 4 72 1 1 2
1:00 PM 6 5 1 2 2 5 40 1 1 5
2:00 PM 6 5 1 3 1 4 36 7 1 7
3:00 PM 6 5 1 3 1 7 44 1 1 6
4:00 PM 6 5 1 2 2 5 36 1 1 5
6:00 PM 6 5 2 2 1 3 41 1 1 7
7:00 PM 6 5 1 4 0 1 85 1 1 5
8:00 PM 6 5 1 2 2 1 43 7 1 2
9:00 PM 6 5 7 2 2 2 38 7 1 3
1D:00 PM 6 5 1 2 2 1 33 7 1 2
Du�iny Frenchys change of shi(qbetween 6 PM w 6 P ),there are 12 empbyaes.After the ahift charqe,fhe employee courM drops back dovm to 6.
Frenchy's has a small rear parliing lot wi(h b spaces.At mos;Mro spaces are allowed ior managers.The remaininp apaces are fior patro�.
Per ayraement wMh their Isndbrd.TF�e Green Apple Is alioaed one pafkh�q space behind thelr buWlrq.
TABLE S...Sunday-January 29,2012 irom 70:00 AM to 10:�PM(�w readings from 4:00 PM to 8:00 PM)
Frenchy's South Beaeh-S15 S GuHview,Clearwater Beach Grean Apple Frozen Yogurt-480 Mandalay Avenue
Time No.of No,of Parking No.of Employes No.of Patron Vacant No.of No.of No.of No.of Employee No.of
of Employees Spacas Oceupied Occupisd Pa�lcing Bieycles Patrons Employeea Vehiclss Patrons
Da Ca c S cea S ces S es
10:00 AM 3 5 7 0 4 0 0 CLOSED CLOSED CLOSED
11:00 AM 6 5 7 0 4 4 9 CLOSED CLOSED CLOSED
12:00 PM 6 5 1 2 2 3 34 1 1 6
1:00 PM 6 5 1 2 2 4 64 1 1 5
2:00 PM 6 5 1 1 3 4 58 7 1 4
3:00 PM 6 5 1 1 3 4 54 1 1 4
4:00 PM 6 5 1 2 2 3 55 7 1 9
6:00 PM 6 5 2 1 2 5 35 7 1 3
7:00 PM 6 5 1 2 2 9 33 1 1 5
8:00 PM 6 5 7 0 4 11 12 1 1 2
9:OOPM 6 5 1 0 4 8 8 CLOSED CLOSED C�OSED
10:OOPM 6 5 7 0 4 3 4 CLOSED CLOSED CLOSED
During Frenchy's changs of sl�ifqbeMreen 5 PM eo 9 PM),tlxre are 12 employeea After tl�e shlR change,tl�e empbyas couM drops baek down to 6.
frenchy's fias a small rear parking lot with S speces.At most,two speccs are albrred formanago►s.ihe remaining spacas are for patrons-
The Green Apple ope�wd aiter 17 AM and Wosed at 9PM a�Sunday,January 27,Z012 Per agreamerrt wHh fheir landbrd,The(iroen Apple is alblted wre
perking space behind their buiding.
180
�.
��
�
160 �
k�
�
140
120
::"
°�°°°Friday,lan 27,2012 '
100 ; '
�Saturday,Jan 28, 2012 I
:'° '
� I
80
Sunday,Jan 29, 2012
60 Parking Capacity(171 Spaces)
40 ''
20 II
I
0 I
10:00 11:00 12:00 1:00 PM 2:00 PM 3:00 PM 4:00 PM 6:00 PM 7:00 PM 8:00 PM 9:00 PM 10:00
AM AM PM PM
$
,2:
�, � �` �, �
%�,
�"���� �-'4y .. ' �
--_ —__ _ - __
� � � '�
II1�iNl
�� k� ��,
-
� ��
. . • �� F.:..
� f,� ,:�;,� � � � � � 11 � � � � 1 �,� � . .�: ��
��(�-. .._. � , , : , , ��: ; � � �::
� #_\ -�-� .��. �� � �� �
.
,� �, ' � �� � �
i: : k ��
; I �
�. . �. ,��. ���� ; r�.
+ , � � 3'� ��.. � ��,s�r,,lr ��;�, ���i`�, �S�_,
Z� _. -, t; _ , ' ,' a� �� �, '� �'' - -� '- -p _ .. �� � i °�
�a�� ' � r _ . � �
���• "�� � �� ��'��� �� :L::: ,i�ll■ l.�E��7;��� � � � � �7��.����� ��1� � ��� I � l�� .��e` ! .I �
,�RF� _ -_ : :_ _ :- _ .__ ,
.� � . ... � ;;.:� ' x,�,
� M ' •� ,-,�, : `%— +^��i i1L ,�1► '�' 1 ■ Giii '_ ii' � •�r�r
` '�` `�� Ili: r'��� '� �.� Iri�� :ll`� �IIIII �'�`�! �� . ��'�'��IIIr��►�:��� 3111111iii:� i� ;�iil '��- f ,��
� ,j�. _ _ -.i�l.� �__ � . - !, � '�.i
� _ � _ �t�r;
� �
�����. CAFE&F:ATERY
. . ��.�� COFFEF CLrLT
�
�
� I
8 ( ;=�� _�0
�
� � �� ._ �i�
._
_ ` _ _ o
,��
� ��'
��
� � � � � ��
� -- - - �
� y
� ` � �
� � � � ���� ���
�� �� �� ��� � � � �
� � m � ' � � � � aa� � � � �
$ �� �a �
F
� � I `� � d�� �$G� � � �� �
a � � d � a � �� �
r , ��
rn -h � � O �� �
'�' � --- - - �
�
�� � � �� � �. ���� �� � ��� a � �_ �
� o � � � �� �` ��� �
. �� �� � � �
�, oa � ��� � ___�� k
- - - � \ � 9 �.,�� �
U
� ` � `` --- � � �CC K
� �` �" �� i
\ �
� O O �
�
a
P � r � �
b � ���
� ���
' � �o �� �� � � � �g �o°°r � �� ���� �o
.� �o � R o��
' �o� 0
p �K � �x �� � �4
� �� �E �
�
����
O
MLMNRAIL-
YNfTE FINSH Q��
�LL R/Jlb ARE f�A10VA8LE �171YB
�� g g OvT o
m� 4 0�Cuc. GROUP�.
p� e�z�nu��vnms
DUN�RI.MYIDA
� ('��7�7l4-alYB
��� � ��
NORTH ELEVATION
J0�7 P1N71Z68 II�
SGALE:3/Ib"=1'-0' �r�.7�e vEeeo
rrtmacr:
IIDTION
� BOBGffii k
COFP'SS
��� CUI��T[JIiB
{6�WNDIL►Y 1YIIN6
CILIII�7'�.71I16m1
exienra r��r �
R@iNN
��'��pJ Id/PAIM�MOI.LOW y
1ETI.L DooR i
! �
�
II��
BXTBRIOR FINLSH LBGEND IILST TLSVATION SOUTH ELEVATION
SGALE:8/Ib`=I'-0" SGALE:3/Ib"=I'-0"
� ��ei�¢•�� `al.12��� 'er�oi,aowic�,vrwe �c,v+wrsr
O ''sMIN WLLIM7S P c��`�`�'� DOO�!IlLK LId1TIN! R6YISONB:
"� .7�n.
� lETNL GM FtA3111HG ICAYHA0.
riw� -rwrte
] 3
OPIOLDm 11VlMIORK Clf� .
PNNTm -3WWiITG 1
9
� �CAYNAR P Wt�FI IMI7! 3
O 5T0lE 9HG10TH�IAWOFI-°JM9lT AdpCMk PrepwSy W L�I
1
� xae�rtoucm�i sNru� / OFFEE CUL ns�in sir:
�
fi d � � ������ D�iL•
OY IfucL EOIE
ao � � � ,aH�.:
lE-OOE
° S.«2""«�`°°�",. ° BA�ST ffi�VATION �,°�J
FIN16H
WML SCONCE. OPERAaE STOREFRONfYMH](Wlb
BUpC�IUTANFlNSH WHIEFIN&1 SGALE:3/Ibx i��-0•