The URL can be used to link to this page

FLD2012-02006; 750 ELDORADO AVE; SHAY RESIDENCE A ♦� � 750 ELDORADO AVE Date Received: 2/1/2012 11 :51 :40 AM Shay Residence ZONING DISTRICT: Low Medium Density Residential LAND USE: Residential Urban (7.5 du/acre) ATLAS PAGE: 249A PLANNER OF RECORD: PLANNER: Matthew Jackson, Planner II , CDB Meeting Date: April 17, 2012 Case Number: FLD2012-02006 Agenda Item: E. 2. Owner: Brian and St�hanie Shav Agent: Steven L. Klar Klar and Klar Architecture Address: 750 Eldorado Avenue CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT GENERAL INFORMATION: REQUEST: Flexible Development application to permit the construction of a new single-family detached dwelling within the Low Medium Density Residential (LMDR) District with a lot area of 6,600 square feet, a lot width of 60 feet, a reduction to the front (north) setback from 25 feet to five feet (to dwelling) where 10 feet is allowable but may be varied based on the Flexibility criteria, a reduction in the front (east) setback from 25 feet to 10 feet (to dwelling) where 10 feet is allowable, and a reduction to the side (west) setback from 10 feet to zero feet (to Costal Construction Control Line) where zero feet is allowable for an in-ground swimming pool and deck at existing grade as a Residential Infill Project under the provisions of Community Development Code Section 2-204.E. ZONING DISTRICT: Low Medium Density Residential(LMDR)District FUTURE LAND USE CATEGORY: Residential Urban (RU) PROPERTY USE: Current: Vacant Proposed: Detached Dwelling EXISTING North: Low Medium Residential (LMDR) District SURROUNDING Detached Dwellings ZONING AND USES: South: Low Medium Residential (LMDR) District Detached Dwellings East: Low Medium Residential (LMDR)District Detached Dwellings West: Preservation(P)District Water ANALYSIS: Site Location and Existing Conditions: The vacant 0.15 acre subject property is located at the southwest corner of Bohenia Circle and Eldorado Avenue. The properties to the north, south and east are zoned Low Medium Density Residential (LMDR) District and are developed with detached dwellings. Land to the west is zoned Preservation(P)District and is the Gulf of Mexico. Community Development Board—April 17,2012 FLD2012-02006—Page 1 of 6 Development Proposal: The proposal is to redevelop the subject property with a single-family detached dwelling. This request is being processed as a Residential Infill Project due to the requested side (west) setback reduction to the Coastal Construction Control Line (CCCL) for pool and decking. And as pursuant to Section 3-905.C.2 of the Community Development Code (CDC), any requests to modify setback requirements from the CCCL shall be considered through a Level Two development process. The development proposal's compliance with the various development standards of the CDC is discussed below. Impervious Surface Ratio (ISR): Pursuant to the Countywide Plan Rules and CDC Section 2- 201.1, within the Residential Urban (RU) land use category, the allowable ISR is 0.65. The site is in compliance as an ISR of 0.41 is proposed. Densitv: Pursuant to the Countywide Plan Rules and CDC Section 2-201.1, within the Residential Urban (RU) land use category, the allowable density is 7.5 units per acre. As the lot area is 6,600 square feet (0.15 acres), one dwelling unit is allowed and therefore, the proposed density is in compliance. Minimum Lot Area: Pursuant to Table 2-204 of the CDC, for Residential Infill Projects, there is no minimum lot area. The lot area of the subject property is 6,600 square feet which exceeds the detached dwelling minimum standard of 5,000 square feet found in Table 2-202. Minimum Lot Width: Pursuant to Table 2-204 of the CDC, for Residential Infill Projects,there is no minimum lot width. The subject property lot width is 60 feet which exceeds the detached dwelling minimum standard of 50 feet found in Table 2-202. Minimum Setbacks: Pursuant to CDC Section 3-903.D, corner lots shall have two front and two side setbacks. As the subject property fronts Eldorado Avenue on the east and Bohenia Circle S on the north, the subject property has two front setbacks (north and east) and two side setbacks (south and west). However, as the portion of Bohenia South the subject property fronts on is undeveloped public beach access that staff does not foresee being developed; staff reviewed this setback as a side setback to be consistent with the existing and emerging surrounding development pattern. Furthermore, while the west setback is technically a side setback pursuant to the aforementioned Section, staff reviewed this setback as it has and will function, a rear setback to be consistent with the existing and emerging development pattern. Pursuant to Table 2-204 of the CDC, within the LMDR District, Residential Infill Projects may have a front setback between 10 to 25 feet but may be varied based on the Flexibility criteria and a side setback between zero to five feet. The proposal includes a front (north) setback of five feet (to building), a front (east) setback of 10 feet (to building), and a side (west) setback of zero feet (to pool and decking). The building will also be set back 5 feet on both the north and south sides. The development is compliant with the above referenced requirements. Community Development Board—April 17,2012 FLD2012-02006—Page 2 of 6 The reduction in front and side setbacks allows for a development consistent with the surrounding and emerging development pattern. As previously discussed the front (north) setback was reviewed as a side setback and a five foot setback meets minimum side setback standards. The existing detached dwelling immediately adjacent to the subject property to the south is setback 10 feet or less from the east property lines. As such, the proposed front (east) setback is consistent with the existing development pattern. With regard to the side (west) setback reduction, the development pattern along Eldorado is moving from typical ranch style Florida homes toward larger homes occupying a greater portion of lot area than the existing homes. In addition, through review of previously approved development applications, a site visit and view of aerial photographs show that several existing waterfront detached dwellings in the vicinity of the subject property have the same or similar structural and building setbacks from the CCCL. Therefore, the side (west) setback reduction to provide a typical amenity of a pool and decking for a beachfront detached dwelling is justified and consistent with the emerging development pattern. The proposal also includes the main structure maintaining a 20-foot setback from the CCCL which is consistent with the homes immediately south (744, 740, 736 and 734 Eldorado) of the subject property. As previously discussed, the property immediately north of the subject property is a public beach access (Bohenia Circle S.). The properties north of the public access primarily have main structure setbacks from the CCCL of 20 feet or less. MaYimum Building Hei h�t-. Pursuant to Table 2-204 of the CDC, for Residential Infill projects, the maximum building height in the LMDR District is 30 feet. The building height of the detached dwelling will have a height of 29 feet as measured from the Base Flood Elevation to midpoint of pitched roof, which is consistent with the above. Minimum Off-Street Parkin�: Pursuant to Table 2-204 of the CDC, for Residential Infill projects, two parking spaces are required. The proposal is to provide two parking spaces for the dwelling, which is consistent with the above. Mechanical Equipment: Pursuant to CDC Section 3-903.H.1, air conditioning and similar mechanical equipment is exempt from the side setback requirements, but such equipment must be screened from view from streets and adjacent property. Outside condensing units for air conditioners will be placed adjacent to the south side of the dwelling behind compliant screening. The pool deck equipment location and screening will be reviewed for compliance at time of building permit. Utilities: Pursuant to CDC Section 3-912, all utility facilities including individual distribution lines shall be installed underground unless such undergrounding is impractical. This proposal will comply with this requirement. Solid Waste: The dwelling unit will be provided a black barrel for solid waste disposal which will be stored exterior to the dwelling. CDC Section 3-201.D.1 requires these black barrels to be screened from view from streets and adjacent properties. Provisions for walls, fences or other appropriate screening materials will be reviewed at time of building permit submittal. Code Enforcement Analysis: There are no outstanding Code Enforcement issues associated with the subject property. Community Development Board—April 17,2012 FLD2012-02006—Page 3 of 6 COMPLIANCE WITH STANDARDS AND CRITERIA: The following table depicts the consistency of the detached dwelling subdivision proposal with the standards as per CDC Tables 2-201.1 and 2-204: Standard Proposed Consistent Inconsistent Density 7.5 du/ac(1 unit) 6.6 du/ac(1 unit) X ISR 0.65 0.41 X Minimum Lot Area N/A 6,600 square feet X Minimum Lot Width N/A 60 feet X Minimum Setbacks Front: 10-25 feet North: Five feet(to dwelling) X' East: 10 feet(to dwelling) X Side: 0-5 feet South: 5 feet(to dwelling) X West: Zero feet(to pool and deck) X Maximum Height 30 feet 29 feet X Minimum Off-Street 2 spaces per dwelling 2 spaces X Parkin unit 1 A front setback of 10-25 feet is reguired but may be varred based on the Flexibility criteria.See setback discussion above COMPLIANCE WITH FLEXIBILITY CRITERIA: The following table depicts the consistency of the development proposal with the Flexibility criteria as per CDC Section 2-204.E (Residential Infill Project): Consistent Inconsistent 1. The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development is X otherwise impracticai without deviations from one or more of the following: intensity or other development standards. 2. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a residential infill project X will not materially reduce the fair market value of abutting properties. 3. The uses within the residential infill project are otherwise permitted in the district. X 4. The uses within the residential infill project are compatible with adjacent land uses. X 5. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a residential infill project X will upgade the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. 6. The design of the proposed residential infill project creates a form and function which X enhances the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. 7. Flexibility in regazd to lot width, required setbacks, height, off-street parking, access X or other development standards are justified by the benefits to community character and the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. Community Development Board—April 17,2012 FLD2012-02006—Page 4 of 6 COMPLIANCE WITH GENERAL STANDARDS FOR LEVEL TWO APPROVALS: The following table depicts the consistency of the development proposal with the General Standards for Level Two Approvals as per CDC Section 3-14.A: Consistent Inconsistent 1. The proposed development of the land will be in hannony with the scale, bulk, X coverage,density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage development and use of X adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons X residing or working in the neighborhood. 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. X 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the X immediate vicinity. 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, X acoustic and olfacto and hours of o eration im acts on ad'acent ro erties. SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION: The Development Review Committee (DRC) reviewed the application and supporting materials at its meeting of March O1, 2012, and deemed the development proposal to be legally sufficient to move forward to the Community Development Board (CDB),based upon the following: Findin�s of Fact: The Planning and Development Department, having reviewed all evidence submitted by the applicant and requirements of the Community Development Code, finds that there is substantial competent evidence to support the following findings of fact: l. That the 0.15 acres is located on the southwest corner of Bohenia Circle and Eldorado Avenue; 2. That the property is vacant; 3. That the proposal is to redevelop the subject property with a single-family detached dwelling; 4. That the proposal includes a reduction of the side setback from the Coastal Construction Control Line (CCCL) of five feet to zero feet where zero feet is allowable; 5. That pursuant to CDC Section 3-905.C.3, any requests to modify setback requirements from the CCCL shall be considered through a Level Two development process; 6. That the proposal includes a reduction of the front (north) setback from 25 to five feet where 10 feet is allowable but may be varied based on the Flexibility criteria and a reduction to the front(east) setback from 25 to 10 feet where 10 feet is allowable; 7. That the building height of the detached dwelling will have a height of 29 feet as measured from the Base Flood Elevation to midpoint of pitched roof; and 8. That there are no outstanding Code Enforcement issues associated with the subject property. Conclusions of Law: The Planning and Development Department, having made the above findings of fact, reaches the following conclusions of law: 1. That the development proposal is consistent with the Standards as per Tables 2-201.1 and 2- 204 of the Community Development Code; 2. That the development proposal is consistent with the Flexibility criteria as per Section 2- 204.E of the Community Development Code; and 3. That the development proposal is consistent with the General Standards for Level Two Approvals as per Section 3-914.A of the Community Development Code. Community Development Board—April 17,2012 FLD2012-02006—Page 5 of 6 Based upon the above,the Planning and Development Department recommends APPROVAL of the Flexible Development application to permit the construction of a new single-family detached dwelling within the Low Medium Density Residential (LMDR) District with a lot area of 6,600 square feet, a lot width of 60 feet, a reduction to the front(north) setback from 25 feet to five feet (to dwelling) where 10 feet is allowable but may be varied based on the Flexibility criteria, a reduction in the front (east) setback from 25 feet to 10 feet (to dwelling) where 10 feet is allowable, and a reduction to the side (west) setback from 10 feet to zero feet (to Costal Construction Control Line) where zero feet is allowable for an in-ground swimming pool and deck at existing grade as a Residential Infill Project under the provisions of Community Development Code Section 2-204.E. with the following conditions of approval: Conditions of A�proval: 1. That the final design and colors of the detached dwelling be consistent with the elevations approved by the CDB; 2. That there are no obstructions in the waterfront site visibility triangles; 3. That pool and deck not be constructed higher than 12 inches above existing grade; 4. That vehicles cannot be parked in the driveway blocking the pedestrian access to the concrete sidewalk; 5. That black barrels stored exterior to the dwelling and outdoor mechanical equipment including pool equipment be screened from view from adjacent streets and properties; 6. That all utility facilities, including but not limited to gas, water, wastewater collection, electric, telephone and television cables, except major transmission lines and transformers, shall be located underground,prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy; 7. Prior to the issuance of any building permits, the Fire Department may require the provision of a Water Study performed by a Fire Protection Engineer in order to ensure that an adequate water supply is available and to determine if any upgrades are required by the developer due to the impact of the project. The water supply must be able to support the needs of any required fire sprinkler, standpipe and/or fire pump. If a fire pump is required,then the water supply must be able to supply 150%of its rated capacity. Prepared by Planning and Development Department Staff: Matt Jackson, Planner II Attachments:Location Map;Aerial Map;Zoning Map;Existing Surrounding Uses Map;and Photographs of Site and Vicinity Community Development Board—April 17,2012 FLD2012-02006—Page 6 of 6 Matthew Jackson 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater,Florida 33756 (727}562-4504 matthew.iacksonna,mvclearwater.com PROFES5IONAL EhPERIENCE ❑ Planner II City of Clearwater Clearwater, Florida May 2011 to Present October 2008 to June 2010 Regulate growth and development of the City in accordance with land resource ordinances and regulations related to community development. Landscape plan review including: conceptual, and variance. Reviews and analyzes site plans and conducts field studies to determine the integrity of development plans and their compatibility with surroundings. Interdepartmental and zoning assistance. Respond as a City representative to citizens, City officials, and businesses concerning ordinances and regulations. Make recommendations and presentations at staff level at various review committees,boards,and meetings. ❑ Planner I Calvin-Giordano and Associates, Fort Lauderdale, Florida May 2005 to December 2007 Project manager for various development applications such as plat, site plan, rezoning and variances. In-depth government agency, in-house and client coordination to ensure that the projects maintained submittal schedules stayed within budget constraints and attained approval. Schedule and lead project kick-off ineetings, ensure municipal project conditions were resolved, produce supporting documents and make site visits as well. Research and prepare due diligence reports including subject matter such as zoning, land uses, densities, available public utilities and land development costs. Member of emergency mitigation committee formed to prepare and mitigate for natural or man-made disasters affecting Calvin,Giordano and Associates and local municipalities. ❑ Manager Church Street Entertainment, Orlando, Florida September 1999 to February 2004 Supervised and managed daytime and nighttime operations of a bar and nightclub entertainment complex including 100+ staff. Conducted hiring and training operations including security and inventory controL Managed and reconciled nightly gross revenues as well as preparing and delivering deposits. Assisted in taking inventory and preparing weekly inventory orders, marketing and special events. ❑ Linguist USArmy, Fort Campbell, KY October 1991 to October 1995 Maintain fluency in the Arabic language and knowledge of customs and culture as well as military readiness for possible deployments or training operations. Co-managed intelligence gathering operation in Haiti including coordination between multiple Special Forces units and civilian authorities. Interpreter between U.S. and Egyptian soldiers during training exercises. Liaison between Special Forces battalions to coordinate certification training. EDUCATION ❑ Master of Arts,Urban and Regional Planning,Florida Atlantic University,2007 ❑ Bachelor of Arts,Urban and Regional Planning,Rollins College,2004 � MANGO ST _ I $ ^ �es ; � �. .I �� 'e� N s � ns 10 � z i8 8 9 �� " h j � ns n9, ,or�o a �� 8 zs6 �9 ? ? �I Z Lass 775 n Q a 15 s 765 a �� - s n�- s 764 n 75 ---- 763 760 � 771 11 n 3 5� O— 5 — �� 'C 753 �� 761_� 14�SB 15 1 �ss ��4 ,a �� C 2 � � 75s s �a �ss I 4 m �s� 5 '_' ,s � 3 760 7613 14 754 �� 750 I � 751 4 n � 2 756 � 7572 15 750 6 C 745 750_ a v ,s � 3 ,e � � � 7551 S .�,� , m � a �a, j a NENIA�IR 741 14 'ao m 2 ,9 � � B� 742 3 8 737 2� ��5+ n 737r2 736 � - ■' S ■ m „ 72 9 $ IRIS ST ��/�� 745 738 733 i �0 734 744 l q 10 13 732 �g � 6 7`i3 14 �Z � JF��.`S� 730 � �� _ O �� 9 � �y T � 2 � 739 8 �5 72g 8 � i �2�� 2 3 � �4 » �5 9 � 1 � � � � 76_.�4 _ �__ 724 ,P 4 5 i $ 6 �� M� 13 i° Mp �3 � O I 7�1- � 730 �� 718 7Y9 7i6 5 y '' 5 18 5 11 721 I 8 � 2 721 4 is 712 �17 4 i2 712 $ ��4 � 710 eo 711 3 13 80 7 � 3 20 { 6 720 717 �08 �� 70 6 8 � � so 707 2 14 � 5 716 7192 21�� 7p5 704 �7 � � 13 705 5 � 4 712 701� 12 2z e� � is 15�� 0 709 g i 3 � 701 � °� 7p14 a �3� � ACACIA ST EXISTING CONDITIONS Owner: Brian and Stephanie Shay Case; FLD2012-02006 Site: 750 Eldorado Property Size: 0.15 acres PIN: 05-29-15-54666-003-0050 Atlas Page: 249A Jessamine � Guyva t � � 6 2. KIPLING p�,qZq s = � ? z ¢ Z �j Z a g � aGARDENIA ST � � a� �a� �yFN/q VERBENA �9 0 a pMANGO ST �w � 2 PROJECT S/TE W °•Q � Z w � O�N�N\P ¢ g m iRis o''FwF ❑> Q � m � ASTER O ACACI� � � . SOMERSET ST � O CAMBRIA W 0 a IDLEW ILD 0 G�� ROVAL AY HpFg�P HEILWOOD � BAY ¢ AVALON N o0 0 � 1 � KENDALL �uanim Z C Z � �a N o m BAY ESPLANADE N�N LOCATION Owner: Brian and Stephanie Shay Case: FLD2012-02006 Site: 750 Eldorado Property Size; 0,15 acres PIN: 05-29-15-54666-003-0050 Atlas Page; 249A i- MANGO ST � �se � . � � �so 781 N ns ,� z � iss e i ns 3 � _ ns no D �ss �ss, � n5 G �ss �sa �� 770 764 a 757 763 760 I � 760 � nt �so a � �s� iss I � 753- C 1 766 765 n i 756 m a .757. _ 755 752 T 760 761 754 751 � . - 754 m 750 I 751 I 756 757 750 . a 7$0 745 755 � 74fi fl1 j 740 �� o oNEN�p�IR S �4, �40 �4> >38 B 737 �i-,_..� D 742 737� 736 750 : O �R�S Sr O �'••��i � 745 738 733 734 P 744 m 732 729 v`� -� .. i 743 732 ��j�_ 730 LMD�Z "`� a �dfl �s�, �2� i �29 736 �39 726 725 � �I 734 �5 724 725 724 � ..�. 723 723 721 720 I . .731 . -720.. . � � 730 725 718 719 716 N �� i721 �I 721 ASTER ST �,2 ��2 I 717 � 1 �724 710 771 � 713 II 720 �1� . 908- 709 708 709 707 � 716 719 ��Q 705 . 704 707 i 712 705 701 700 703 � 710 N 701 � � 701 �°n � � ACAC/A ST ZONING Owner: Brian and Stephanie Shay Case: FLD2012-02006 Site; 750 Eldorado Property Size: 0.15 acres PIN; 05-29-15-54666-003-0050 Atlas Page: 249A � � • � �=i � �1- �� I �� 7� ,yY, Y `i,t�i ` C � � �� . . �; �. �� , ��i ^� � ��, 2 2 ` f 1 r �r� ��' �r �� . � � ' �' �.�! � n�� . � ti �� . g,4 z�,'". tY A ��':''� �a �� k � r;� i a g,,.oa:. �!'.. �:- , . r � �I �p h''� �� 1�� 1 .. .• . s� - .?�:. �� »� ..k. � r �� y Y � .I �'1�,: •y�_ 'vb'7L `�� .. . �1 �� Y �� I a{.,� �.� g, � �s & �� 3 yAr �,x ,' r > � * , r� � ♦y ` �; �� • � t,�u �"'�.R �' h ' � `r . � � � �.�,�� : - #+ � � �f �� ` � � c � � tr i �� " ;�+� ��'s � �-I � , y. . ��}R � `" ._ . . �l. T�;" � � . • +�..�.� �� , . i ��. ��"� �'i�: � ' si , ;. ... , } �� 1 , . y■) ' . �.� ' � K� � 1 � ! 5?A �¢ � , ?¢`�.„ ` � � �� a�� ,� . �� . � , , � b ��4 � ,. �'�� r ��y?r '� J I� d I """I i+ih' .+., ! ��j y' t� t � �"w ,� '„ r � i _�.; �y .� ' �� . �� .+� � C_ '� ' � �,� �-� �f, y •� ' �q �;t I �,S . �{�j � i �. � �.;�,r � f I .. . ' ..p .. . � . , C i, l , �'s�`. ' �� ` .�'� `3*,�„" , i - ♦ �"-' , � i '�� .,�,. � � � `, + �j ''`-�••� ,� !.� �►, � �" �.; � �i � � AERIAL � Owner: Brian and Stephanie Shay Case; FLD2012-02006 Site: 750 Eldorado Property Size: 0.15 acres PIN: 05-29-15-54666-003-0050 Atlas Page: 249A � I �.�._ ...�_�-_�-�..__.�...—.. f,._-- ' �7�^ a n T , �s � '� l " ; ... �.. ..3.��+- .�.r.s��.....y_.,,�� : � .q,�y�� , ..,. aP , .�T"`%L'4 y ) — � ttsc�� (�, �3;,v�f jC, �, „� , ' `��ii� r� � ',� 11 r �� .,,� I! � � E,�;tt�u�6, ��:��et�4�:�tttt,.� �� "f1 � ' �, �E'� -- >�.�=F"�;�"�..- .,�.:, . > �i�' >,, °� ��:� View from the east property line looking west View of the property immediately south of the subject property f .� . l �_"---_._____ , � .: � _ � ..�- ' - _ -- .,7 ` '�s _ � _ - �"'�e. _._... ..- — ��,� � ---- �--- .�.,a�` '' s'��a� . '�' � '-��.:� -�� '� --- �. , -� �a . � , „ , :� .� 4` ,�}p� � � � � ' -. F �- �, r, �Z �. �:. 1, 4 � c. j� _ .« w�tcH �, +# ' . ... � r CNRDREN w t «�1. � � � ff . wY!HafYr+TF+Y�.+�� +�rr�rrr-h .�.+� �"' •JtL'v ■� .. . �i'.' , . , ISS�'n4'�* :�1 t ■�l� a� _��"�1+�`��"��"�' "'�� - ,. .. �' ,��7�_ -, II � . . .. . ' , i�/� ��.�. p , ✓d+.+F' , ��` i, J f.. .'r�ii,�y��Aa ��s �. (�� 1 4� � � .' y�,� . . ._. . ��C�.:;A► � r � ��yt �'�nr o'��'7r�� . w'� ,�'r:. � ;.' ��.: ., . +3�.� + � 'r-a:• ��r. �i„� w�+a1. y 1 ,i,{, ;a'+� ) � View of the properties immediately north of the subject View from the subject property looking north property I I i � --� _" ,— Rr— �4 � '�� __�_'___' _/ � . .. ... . ._ \ � -- ,..,¢ j� � ti � '� (A i ;,' i�'� , ----�-+� �,,^' �,,, � .�v .. ��`� � �S� c. ' t�E ;�,��i . � J ,.� �' 44�jr� I �. ,�il�G a' w �.� � �`f- _l�L��-� "' �i� �' -.' t'. �3� s � �: �I °" �: . e�+—"—::.i:_ ..._. ._:�"_" .�n�r�� ,��,� � ��'=,`� L ,��'a a'�'n+1 .,c,`�.�`-: . ' r... r,�?.��y�9K"`'t`�+�'��;+�G R,. . �'M� �'9 a'1'y-tt," .?,+;�' � --i. ..,-�'^^> . View from the subject property looking south View of the unimproved right-of-way adjacent to the � north property line of the subject property 750 Eldorado Avenue FLD2012-02006 � March 12, 2012 City of Clearwater Planning and development Department � Project: SHAY RESIDENCE (FLD2012-02006). klar and klar 750 ELDORADO AVE architects inc. Architect's Project No.: 11K20-01. RE: Plan review comments. Dear Plans Reviewer: Please allow this letter to serve as a written response to your plan develbpment review comments. They are addressed in the same order as received (copy enclosed). ENGINEERING REVIEW: Comment #1: PARKED VEHICLES SHALL NOT BLOCK THE CITY'S SIDEWALK PER CITY ORIDANCE SECTION 30.041(1) b. PARKED 28473 u.s. 19 n. VEHICLES IN THE DRIVEWAY SHALL NOT OVERHANG INTO THE c I e a r w a t e r CITY'S SIDEWALK AND RIGHT OF WAY. florida 33767 Response: ACKNOWLEDGED Comment #2: PROVIDE ON THE ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN THE TYPE OF MATERIAL FOR THE PRPOSED DRIVEWAY. Response: SEE REVISED SHEET SP1, NOTED MATERIAL OF NEW ��,�' DRIVEWAY IS CONCRETE. �� X} � ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: � �::rn Comment #1: NO LIGHT SHALL BE VISIBLE OR EXTEND IN AREAS � ��ks{, IDENTIFIED AS SEA TURTLE NESTING AREAS DURING THE NESTING �^�"}' SEASON (MAY 1 TO OCTOBER 31). THOSE AREAS WHERE � 34�' .r�+n.�4' '`acs. h 727.799.5420 SERCURITY AND PUBLIC SAFETY REQUIRE LIGHTING, p • " ALTERNATIVE LIGHT MANAGEMENT APPROACHES SHALL BE fax 727.799.9625 APPLIED. PRVIDE EVIDENCE OF SEA TURTLE-FRIENDLY LIGHTING www.kfarklar.com IN ACCORDANCE WITH CITY CODE AND STATE LAWS PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS. Response: ACKNOWLEDGED Comment #2: THE PROPERTY OWNER SHALL BE ADVISD THAT FLORIDA STAUES (SUBSECTION 161.053) PROHIBITS CONSTRUCTION OF STRUCTURES SEAWARD OF THE COASTAL CONSTRUCTION CONTROL LINE (CCCL), EXCAVATION AND REMOVAL OF BEACH MATERIAL, ALTERNATION OF EXISTING GROUND ELEVATIONS, DAMAGING SAND DUNES OR VEGETATION GROWING ON THEM. ANY ALTERNATION OR REMOVAL OF DUNES AND/OR BEACH VEGETATION REQUIRES APPROVAL FROM THE roberta s. klar aia steven I. klar aia ��z. J . . CITY AND A PERMIT FROM THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIROMENTAL PROTECTION (FDEP). PLEASE ACKNOWLEDGE PRIOR TO COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD. Response: ACKNOWLEDGED FIRE REVIEW: Comment #1: MUST SHOW CLOSEST FIR� HYDRANT WITHIN 500 FEET OF THE NEW SINGLE FAMILY HOME. ACKNOWLEDGE PRIOR TO CDB , Response: ACKNOWLEDGED, CLOSET FIRE HYDRANT IS APPROX. 103' AWAY FROM NORTHEAST CORNER OF FRONT OF SUBJECT ' PROPERTY. PLANNING REVIEW: Comment #1: PURSUANT TO THE TABLE FOUND IN THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE (CDC) SECTION 2-203, WATERFRONT DETACHED DWELLINGS SHOULD BE 25 FEET EXCEPT WHERE ADJACENT STRUCTURES ON EITHER SIDE OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY ARE SETBACK 20 FEET THEN THE REAR SETBACK SHALL BE 20 FEET. BASED ON THE SUBMITTED SURVEY, THE PRPERTY TO THE SOUTH MAINTAINS A SETBACK OF GREATER THAN 20 FEET AND THE SUB;JECT PROPERTY MUSI" MEET THIS SETBACK AT A MINIMUM. FUTHERMORE, THE SETBACK OF THE PROPERTY TO THE NORTH MUST BE PROVIDED IN ORDER TO ASCERTAIN THE ALLOWABLE REAR SETBACK OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY. Response: SEE REVISE SHEET SP1, NOTE ADJACENT PROPERTY TO SOUTH NOTED WITH AN EXISTING STRUCTURAL SETBACK OF 13' FROM THE CCCL. ADJACENT PROPERTY TO NORTH IS A 60' WIDE BEACH ACCESS LOT. , Comment #2: PURSUANT TO CDC SECTION 3-908.A.2, ROOF OVERHANGS SHALL BE LIMITED TO 40% OF THE SETBACK OR TEN FEET,WHICHEVER IS LESS. AS, SUCH REVISE THE OVERHANGS ON THE NORTH AND EAST BUILDING FACADES AS THEY PROJECT INTO MORE THAN 40% OF THE REQIJIRED SETBACKS: THE REQUIRED SETBACKS ARE RESPECTIVELY FIVE AND TEN FEET. ONCE SETBACK ON WEST PRPERTY LINE 18 DETERMINED, THE AMOUNT ' OF OVERHANG ALLOWED WILL BE CALCULATED AND PROVIDED. Response: SEE REVISED SHEET SP1, NOTE STRUCTURE AND OVERHANG SETBACKS ON EAST FACADES HAS BEEN COMPLIED WITH. Comment #3: PURSUANT TO CDC SECTION 3-912 OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE, FOR DEVELOPMENT THAT DOES NOT INVOLVE A SUBDIVISION, ALL UTILITIES, INCLUDING INDIVIDUAL DISTRIBUTION LINES, MUST BE INSTALLED UNDERGROUND UNLESS SUCH UNDERGROUNDING IS NOT . , \ PRACTICABLE. AS SUCH, ADD A NOTE TO UTILITY PLANS THAT NEW UTILITY LINES SHALL BE INSTALLED UNDERGROUND. Response: ACKNOWLEDGED If you have any questions regarding these issues, please call to discuss. RespectFully, , i �� Steve L. Klar„ NCARB Klar and Klar Architects, Inc. Enclosed: (15) Copies Original development review comments. (15)SETS OF SP1,A1.0, A2.0 (15)Copies original DRC application . ��i ��`�� CITY OF CLEARWATER �� `�� =�� PLANNING SL Dh'VELOPMEN'C DEI'ARTMENT ��_ �� POST�FFICE BOB�748,CLEAR�C'ATER,FLO�uDe 33758�748 �9',�I°+s,�, G�� MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 Sou�MYxx►'i.E AvErrus,CI.EARWATER,FLO�n 33756 o��TER,�n> T��r�xorr�(72�562-4567 F�(727)562-4576 11:15 AM Case number: FLD2012-02006--750 ELDORADO AVE Owner(sj: Brian Shay 4012 Southwestern Bivd Dallas, TX 75225-7035 PHONE: No phone, Fax: No fax, Email: No email Applicant: PHONE: No phone, Fax: No fax, Email: No email Representative: Steven Klar 28473 Us Highway 19 N, Suite 602 Clearwater, FL 33761 PHONE: 7277995420, Fax: No fax, Email: Steve@klarklar.Com Location: .15 acres located at the southwest corner of Bohenia Circle and Eldorado Avenue. Atlas Page: 249A Zoning District: Low Medium Density Residential Request: Flexible Development application to permit the construction of a new single-family detached dwelling within the Low Medium Density Residential (LMDR) District with a lot area of 6,600 square feet, a lot width of 60 feet, a reduction to the front(north) setback from 25 feet to five feet(to dwelling)where 10 feet is allowable but may be varied based on the Flexibility criteria, a reduction in the front(east)setback from 25 feet to 10 feet(to dwelling)where 10 feet is allowable, and a reduction to the rear(west) setback from 10 feet to zero feet(to Costal Construction Control Line) where zero feet is allowable for an in-ground swimming pool and deck at existing grade as a Residential Infill Project under the provisions of Community Development Code Section 2-204.E. Proposed Use: Detached Dwelling Neighborhood Clearwater Neighborhood Coalition Association(s): Presenter: Matthew Jackson, Planner II 2/27/2012 1 DRC_Comments °EQUAL ENfPiAYMENT AI�'D�IRMATNE ACTION EMI'LOYER° The DRC reviewed this application with the following comments: Engineering Review Prior to Community Development Board: 1. Parked vehicles shall not block the City's sidewalk per City Ordinance Section 30.041(1)(b). Parked vehicles in the driveway shall not overhang into the City's sidewalk and right-of-way. 2. Provide on the architectural site plan the type of material for the proposed new driveway. General Note: 1. "Access to the Beach"and view of the beach, on Bohenia Circle South, shall not be blocked and shall be kept clear. 2. DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. Environmental Review General Note(s) 1. DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review, additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. 2. No light shall be visible or extend in areas identified as Sea Turtle Nesting Areas during the nesting season (May 1 to October 31). Those areas where security and public safety require lighting, alternative light management approaches shall be applied. Provide evidence of sea turtle-friendly lighting in accordance with City code and state laws prior to the issuance of building permits. 3. The property owner shall be advised that Florida Statute(Subsection 161.053) prohibits construction of structures seaward of the Coastal Construction Control Line(CCCL), excavation and removal of beach material, alteration of existing ground elevations, damaging sand dunes or vegetation growing on them. Any alteration or removal of dunes and/or beach vegetation requires approval from the City and a permit from the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP). Please acknowledge prior to Community Development Board. Fire Review 1) Must show closest fire hydrant within 500 feet of this new single family home.ACKNOWLEDGE PRIOR TO CDB 2/27/2012 2 DRC_Comments °EQUAL El�'I�IPLOYhiINT AND AFFIRMATNE ACTION EMPLOPER° � Planning Review This comment is being provided as a courtesy. Contact the Building Department as they may require an 18 foot setback from the seawall to preserve the deadman structures. However, there have been similar applications in the area requesting and receiving approval for similar developments. Prior to Development Order 1 Pursuant to the table found in Community Development Code(CDC) Section 2-203,waterfront detached dwellings should be 25 feet except where adjacent structures on either side of the subject property are setback 20 feet and then the rear setback shall be 20 feet. Based on the submitted survey, the property to the south maintains a setback of greater than 20 feet and the subject property must meet this setback at a minimum. Furthermore,the setback of the property to the north must be provided in order to ascertain the allowable rear setback of the subject property. 2 Pursuant to CDC Section 3-908.A.2, roof overhangs shall be limited to 40 percent of the setback or ten feet,whichever is less. As such, revise the overhangs on the north and east building facades as they project into more than 40 percent of the required setbacks. The required setbacks are respectively five and 10 feet. Once the setback on the west property line is determined, then the amount of overhang allowed will be calculated and provided. 3 Pursuant to CDC Section 3-912 of the Community Development Code, for development that does not involve a subdivision, all utilities, including individual distribution lines, must be installed underground unless such undergrounding is not practicable. As such, add a note to the utility plans that new utility lines shall be installed underground. Stormwater Review Prior to Building Construction Permit: 1.With Building Permit Application, provide side swales and show location on the site plan. 2. With Building Permit Application, demonstrate no adverse impact for stormwater runoff to adjacent property to south (Lot 4). 3. DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. Traffic Eng Review General Note: 1. DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. 2/27/2012 3 DRC_Comments °EQUAI,ENIPIAYMENT M'D AFFR2MATNE ACTTON EMPLOYER° - �ka' ��;,�,��,, Planning&Development Department � � � �;,_,,�{�.��rwater Flexible Development Application ,ta�' s��N� u Detached Dwellings,Duplexes orAssociated Accessory Use Structures IT IS INCUMBENT UPON THE APPLICANT i'O SUBMIT COMPLETE AND CORRECT INFOFtMATION. ANY MISLEADING, DECEPTIVE, INCOMPLETE OR IRICORRECT INFORMATION MAY INVALIDA3E VOU6i APPLICATION. ALL APPLICATIONS ARE TO BE FILLED OUT COMPLETELY AND COR6iECTLY,AND SUBMITTED IN PERSON(NO FAX OR DELIVERIES) TO THE PLANNING&DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY NQON ON THE SCHEDULED DEADLINE DATE. A TOTiAL OF 11 COMPLETE SETS OF PIANS AND APPLICATION MATERIALS (1 ORIGINAL AND 10 COPIES}AS REQUIRED WITHIN ARE TO BE SUBMITTED FOR REVIEW BY THE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMiV111TEE. SUBSEQUENT SUBMITTAL FOFt THE COMMUNITY DEVP�NS AND APP CATIONS AREIREQUIRED TO BE COLLATED,STAPLED AND FOLD DNNTO SET'S.�tl�RIGINAL AND 14 COPIES). THE APPLICANT, BY FIlING THIS APPLICATION, AGREES TO COMPLY WITH ALL APPLICABLE REQUIREMENTS OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE. FIRE DEPT PRELIMARY SITE PLAN REVIEW FEE: $200 APPLICATION FEE: $300 PROPERTY OWNER(PER DEED): MAILINGADDRESS: ��'Z„ �Il�'r1N'US'�'��`� �-vD ��4 � ,�� PHONE NUMBER: ��('/Mrc'i" �� Z'3Z. I190 : �L, �� EMAIL: . AGENT OR REPRESENTATIVE: c•rt-.rr 1 ( MAILING ADDRESS: �j �-( �,� �I(�� `�- � �2 � ��'�� ' PHONE NUMBER: °t, . � EMAIL: �• � ADDRESS OF SUBJECT PROPERIY: ,�jO �•1.�,7R.A�GO Cl�� u 4�`� 33�(°1 PARCEL NUMBER(S): 5°Z�I° r7' �o " �O 5 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: �t'j �I.00.IL �c�`�-��.��y`�' �` ��L�i � ��v�Q- �t r �o�� S �.NOY3r1�o,l ��.Ar�r r � ► '�(A� '32-35� 1r1LUl�Vrv � '��i��L ��Q D`.� D� �l�rLLA�j �+►�� PROPOSED USE(S): -t0`�„�.{ {�J�t4tt Ya�'�� =1�,1� '�1k�1.�1b SiwllnlX'�. �- ; �� DESCRIPTION OF RE4UEST: �'��71/(.'�Ilea�°Cb D�' �� Oj�'� ��"' A1hl'b �" �� Specificalfy identify the request � e,�'�[(.�, 'tb �'� ��L, �L � (include aU requested code flexibility; �^i� �,��y �p ��['L�(� ��jZ�k�. �1.0 � � e.g., reduction in required number of��MC� � � �� ,� O� �� y�F ��!,�1.�` parking spaces, height, setbacks, lot �,�„ �� size,lot width,specifc use,etc.): �(,11��j � `�+�'Z �� CL�.A�� ' �� ST � �' . 5�►['��-T' �°p�-�`-�' ��D��c.E��u, ��J�� Planning&Development Department,100 S.Myrtle Avenue,Clearwater,FL 33756,Tei:727-562-4567;FaxRev sed20712 Page 1 of 7 LL .:�_� x��,�,,r, Planning&Development Department o k,,�� 4,,�, };�; �,,�� ,�a, €',� Flexible Development Application � �`;��au�°,, _�� Data S eet PLEASE ENSURE TNAT THE P LICATION IBE NG FOUND'SINCOMPL TE 'AND POSSRB Y D FERRED UNOL�TH�E OlLOVO(!NG WILL RESULT IN YOUR A APPLICATION CYCLE. ZONING DISTRICT: 1"� F'^`— FUTURE LRIVD USE PLAN DESIGNATION: �"� EXISTING USE(currently existing on site): �c`�1r9��° �'��`'LI�I�J� ti�L`^�� '�� M�V .�nuu v t�inc.lc�fc. 5f��;�r. �►�L`� �� . PROPOSED USE(new use,if any;plus existing,if to remain):��(s�� ` ti SITE AREA: ( .Ln dC7 sq.ft _�� _ acres GROSS FLOOR AREA(total square footage of ail buildings): Existing: sq.ft. Proposed: �y�2 sq.ft. Maximum Ailowable: �f,(p�0 sq.ft. GROSS FLOOR AREA(total square footage devoted to each use,if there will be multiple uses): First use: �f� sq.ft. Second use: ,�e, sq.ft. Third use: sq.ft. FLOOR AREA RATIO(total square footage of all buiidings divided by the total square footage of entire site): Existing: � Proposed: • yZ Maximum Aliowable: �� BUILDING COVERAGE/FOOTPRINT(15tfloor square footage of all buildings): Existing: � sq.ft. ( � %of site) Proposed: 2� sq•ft. ( �'� %of site) Maximum Permitted: 21,a1 sq.ft. ( �'p %of site) GREEN SPACE WITHIN VEHICULAR USE AREA(green space within the parking lot and interior of site;not perimeter buffer): Existing: � Sq•�• � %of site) Proposed: �Qt,{� sq.ft. ( �t7i$ %of site) VEHICULAR USE AREA(parking spaces,drive aisles,loading area): . Existing: sq.ft. ( %of site) Proposed: I�_ sq.ft. ( _�7�2 %of site) Planning&Devefopment Department,100 S.Myrtie Avenue,Clearwater,FL 33756,Tel:727-562-4567;FaxRevised201 12 Page 2 of 7 IMPERVIOUS SURFACE RATlO(total square footage of impervious areas divided by the total square footage of entire site): Existing: Proposed: ° �� Maximum Permitted: fl$��, DENSIN(units,rooms or beds per acre): BIJILDING HEIGHT: Existing: � Existing: 7� Proposed: ��.1�(�.I.�i�1�+1•�J• Proposed; 2q'�� Maximum Permitted: 1.Sbyo��Ll�1�(a t�1�� Maximum Permitted: ,1�p!�d ti '�e2 �P �,12� OFF-STREET PARKING: � Existing: Note:A parking demand study must be provided In conjunctian with any request Proposed: 2, to reduce the amount of required off-street parking spaces. Pfease see the adopted Parking Demand Study Guidelines for further informat+on. Minimum Required: '� 2 to I 5 r�i�wi� WHAT IS THE ESTIMATED TOTAL VALUE OF THE PROJECT UPON COMPLETION? $ `. � ZONING DISTRICfS FOR ALL ADJACENT PROPERTY: Nortn: 1-NIbIZ. South: L East: West: Lhb�— STATE OF FLORIDA,COUNTY OF PINELLAS I � day of I, the undersigned, acknowledge that all Sworn to and subscribed before me this representations made in this application are true and �,��,�,t,.,v�� 1z' .to me and/or by accurate to the best of my knowledge and authorize ��L� �� US ,who is personally known has City representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application. � produced ' Y1.�c�S[3�c� ��'"n _as identification. r-- � iG ' Nota ubl`ic, P�l�w Q� �-��S gnature o� operty owner or representative rY P �t� My commission expires: �� Planning&Development Department,100 S.Myrtle Avenue,Clearwater,FL 33756,Tel:727-562-4567;FaxRev sed201 12 Page 3 of 7 LL �,,;,.��;�,�y,: Planning&Development Department °1��: {�:-��l�Y��.r�ate� Flexible Development Application r al�;��_...:�tiiila�^. � Site Plan Submittal Package Check ist IN ADDITION TO THE COMPLETED FLEXI CE550RYLUSE/STRUCTUREPASSO IA ED W(TH EITHEIR AIOSWGLEO-AMI YG�TACHED DETACHED DWELLING, DUPLEX, OR AC DWELLING OR DUPLEX SHAlL INCLUDE A PLOT PLAN WITH THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION: � Responses to the General Applicability criteria as set forth in Section 3-914.A. The attached Flexible Development Application General Applicability Criteria sheet shall be used to provide these responses. _ � Responses to the flexibility criteria for the specific usvelo bme n AQpI cation FI xib lity Cr ter a she gshall be(used t hprov de subject property is located. The attached Flexible De p P these responses. 0� A signed and sealed survey of the property prepared by a registered land surveyor including the location of the property, dimensions, acreage, location of all current structures/improvements, location of all public and private easements including official records book and page numbers and street right(s)-of-way within and adjacent to the site. ��❑ If the application would result inli ation mu tlprovidle thalt nformat o'n required by Section 4!202.A.5mobile home park as provided in F.S.§723.083,the app ier, seawall or other si milar 1�'�❑ If this application is being submitted for the purpose of a boatlift,catwalk, davit, docic, marina, p marine structure, then the application must provide detailed plans and specifications prepared by a Florida professional engineer, bearing the seal and signature of the engineer, except signed and sealed plan�s shall not be r�equired for thelin pon or replacement of decking, stringers, railing, lower landings, tie piles, or the patchin or reinforcin of existing p ' � private and commercial docks. �❑ A tree survey showing the location, DBH (diameter at breast height), and species on the parcel prop/�os��for development with a DBH of four inches or more and identifying those trees proposed to be removed. I�Lfl"�� Asite plan with the following information: � North arrow,scale,location map and date prepared. � Location of the Coastal Construction Control Line(CCCL), whether the property is located within a Special Flood Hazard Area,and the Base F(ood Elevation(BFE)of the property,as applicable. � Location,setbacks and use of all existing and proposed building and structures. � Location of all existing and proposed parking areas,sidewalks and driveways. � Location,type of material and height of all existing and proposed fences. I� Location of all existing and proposed utilities,including water,sewer,gas,and stormwater. � Location of all existing utility easements, including Official Records book and page numbers, and any proposed utility easements. � Building or structure elevation drawings that depict the proposed building height,building materials,and concealment of all mechanical equipment located on the roof. i� Planning&Development Department,100 S.Myrtle Avenue,Clearwater,FL 33756,Tel:727-562-4567;FaxRev sedZ 1 12 Page 4 of 7 , , , i LL ,,,�.i�, ;�,, Planning&Development Department °�� ,��,te� Flexible Development Application ~ ��'� `�'��` General Applicability Criteria U PROVIDE COMPLETE RESPONSES TO EACH�F DEVELO(PMENT ROPOSp�AB�LITY CRITERIA EXPLAINING HOW,IN DETAIL,THE CRITERION IS BEING COMPLIEa WITH PERTHIS 1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. � 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. �J�� W� S1'CTu'� �a � � � p�.t�� d �- �``''`' U p� � 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety or persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use. �� .�.� ��r a� �„� �P+,�uacr A�.l, pt�D l�r� (A�t�-�� ;ti,...�,��\�� _ .�- �, 'M�r � -� e� 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. ' ' °� 0 �J Y+� isrs� L.+. ►r�11� ��:� 1 C'^iC✓i'CIiMA�I�"�„`.SI+��rl o �W• WV�1/�� O l�w` � E �- � osed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for 5. The prop development. r _ Dv�'L rv ir. IS �hL /Ll•d" G�� d� i"�- 1Ma✓il,�� lCl LI►�l lf f h�•�D 1� �� „ 1JD�WfUS D A�.�- � 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse efFects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts,on adjacent properties. , � � � � fi'ta(l'?� �Mx'!i 43 �'�' ��'GrJ o �, � `w n,�r � on,l P(anning&Development Depati�nent,100 S.Myrtle Avenue,Clearwater,FL 33756,Tel:727-562-4567;FaxRevi ed2 1 12 Page 5 of 7 ��i Planning&Development Department o �'€ ,F� ,��,�;, �l . >�;.�; ;q�;�,��,� Flexible Development Application �`x?�di��u�._�t��cti u�` ' � Flexibility Criteria PROVIDE COMPLETE RESPONSES TO THE ACH THE SUBJE T PIROPERRTY S O ATED. EXPLAIN HOWSIN TAILEEaACH CRI ER N FORTH IN THE ZONING DISTRICT(S)IN WH IS BEING COMPLIED �IT��E��S�;�L��T PROPOSAL(USE SEPAItATE SHEETS AS NECESSARY). � �i 1. b�1 rai'„'f� 0 5� T � .�i� 1 o°t�krt�s� 1�► varccl�. ,�e�rr" �lo�F�� r�. �.—_�i�'6�k�•S�5 �._�a,i--r� �a �� 4�w�It'wo�w�.�r �r��s. z. �t w P� f w �V �tat ��r v tl�wv� � ��,rm.� � • a. ' tS l5 �C �51�k l.f� �M (.�.� l�'.�' 1� skUoOu�J�/fle�2r�tTi'�D l�l 'P�t� b1s�2+►_�_ 4. s wS��, 1��rw �w-s-� ts coµn�k.��. W�ti°u� ��c�r s��at.�. ��r iz�.sti�us, 5. -t� ��th��k�7.�, �a�f� !��'�T` W�u. v��.. � tr�r��i.�c�t.� �rG��tr-r I�Y v�,;��,�� h�� I�tGL� �Ml�W !'�Sdd��U"u �3!-N�F) �'1i� l� �,3197�( T�'v �� . � 5. � Li�i. �tHl IDT..�Gic� S� /�P � 1�1U�5 t1k1'�. DV6�,Ar1.V O �►ll ��C'✓ �. -1��. �f�Tl� t�( �J� sEtt�l� w►�� t �Ff� Gor�r��n��wr ,�l � �J1-��v �h pCa�'v1�rv �' 5��•�i1� �''►-Yr.sd�lt.fv I�JI�11�' VIA�l.l�l'Crh A1�JAu'�T 'YRr�brQTaTVS - 8. Planning&Development Department,100 S.Myrtle Avenue,Clearwater,FL 33756,Tel:727-562-4567;FaxRev sed2 1 12 Page 6 of 7 , I LL ;::::;,...:_:. Planning&nevelo�me�t Department o.^. ,�.r, i;�:;,_ , �XCc`l�1.0�1 ,::.;, ,,:,. �1�'�1�16� ��V6'.��?�3i�1�'ll�,�� .� �� =�se��i�r� �''<;:_n .e::ii�A -� • U �ffi.c��t�o A�u�ho��.�� e1�t �.�� 1. Provide names of all property atuners an deed—PRtNT$uil names: �t�tvi t51�i �� P. 2. That(!am/�we are)the owner(s)and record title holder{s}of the fotlowing described propert�: �S�� r�r�r� , for which a request#or(describe r�es�1�_ � � � n��f 3. That this property constitutes the propert�r� �� e��` �, A � r� ��'r�r� �� 4. Thatthe undersigned(haslhave�appointed and(does/do}appoint: ��'�V � � as(his/their}agent(s)to execute any petit+�ns or o#her documents necessarY t�a��Such petition: 5. That this a�da�it has been executed to induce the City of C�earwater, Florida to cansider snd act on the above descrihe ,.. ;.�,`Tr� property, 6, That site visits the prope re necessary I�y ��tY represer+ta�ives in order to process this applicaiion and the owne authorizes Ci resentatt s to visit and•photograph�tse Rroperty described in thfs apPlication; 7. That(I/w , i ed au'thority,hereby certifythat the fioregoing is true and carrect. Property Qwner ro wner Propert+f Owner ' Prope�LY��+ner • STATE OF FLORIDA.Cai1NTY OF PINBLLAS BEFORE ME TNE UNDERSIGNED,,4N OFFICEft DULY GOMMISSIONED BY 7��F�E P�RSOt*tALL OA PEARED 'fHIS 1 DAY OF�'�"`'�'��J— ,� �i C� WHO HAVIPIG BEEN FtRST DULY SWQRN v�l�t��( i � � DEPOSED AND SAYS THAT HElSHE FULLY UNDERSTANDS THE C�NTENTS OF THEAFFIDAVIT THAT NE/SHE S1GN�d. • RBBY R.LUKACS ��,� =ot'�Y�,�� MY COP7kfl5SION#�106E92 /, Notary Public Signature � p(PIRES:JUL 05,2015 U �� Bonded thrau�h 1st Stste Insurance i. i r7C n �� _ .._,.��. — My Corr►mission F�cpires: Nofa a mp Clearwater�FL 3375fi,TeI:727-562-4567;Fax�ev sed 07f12 Planning&Devefopment Depastment,16D S.�Yrtfe Avenue, . Page 7 of 7 ' I#: 2011114987 BK: 17238 PG: 316, 05/02/2011 at 04:41 PM,_ RECORDING 2 PP,GES $18.50 D DOC STAMP COLLECTION $6650.00 KEN BURKE, CI�ERK OF COURT PINELT.aG COUNTY, FL BY DEPUTY CLERK: CLKDM08 Prcparcd By:Mikell L.S�Geriu:xin RECOItD& RETL'lil�TO: SOMF,RS TiT�.F.COMPAI��Y 1290(:ourt Strcet Clcanvatcr,FL 33756 (727)�i�lt-t088 phone incidental to the issuance of a titte insurance policy. rile�Tumber: 1103026C Parc�.l Ill i�: OSlZ9/15/54666/0(13JOOSb s, ;�,y� , - 1 Lia.�!.! .1.. '.. • y�� \ \r`V!I.`%y�!��,'� -,� ��VARRa1�TY D�:F.D � �. �'"� {inll1VID�UAL) This V+%ARRANTY I)�ED,dated U5/0212{)11 by Emerick Zovko.Trustse of the Edith Follis Revocable Trust dated August 26, 9992,as amended whose post office address �s: hcrctnuti:cr cullcd lhc GRANTOR,tn Brian Shay and Stephanie Shay,husband and wife uhosc post ofticc address is: �U22 Soutt��►estern Blvci.,Dallas,TX 75225 herein�tfler called the CiRl�V'1'LE;: (Wherever used herein the teruis"Grairt�r" and "Grantee"include all paiKics to tliis instrumenl ana ihe hcirs, lebal representatities and assigtis of individuals,and tlie suc:�es�urs and assigns of corporations.j Wl'I'I�f�.SSLTII: That the GRANT4R, lor and in considerauon of thc sunn of$10.00 and other�alUable considerations,rccclpt whcrc:of is hei�h��acknowledg�,hereby grants.bargains,sells,alicns,retnisc�,releases, convey°s and ec►nlirms unto ihe GR�'�N�1'LL,all that certain l�nd siluate in Pinellas County, Clorida.�'i�: . \ Lot 5, l�ioek 3,NL�.VDALAY St?Rl)1VISlON,according to Uie map or plat thereol;as sh�wn on plat recorded in 1'lat Book �14, Pagcs 32 throu�h 35,mclusive,of fhe Public Records of Pincllas County,Florida,together vt�ith n�arian ri�hts appcRaining thereto. Yropert,y is not thc 6amcstc:�d uf the Grantor � (irantor has full power and xuthority t�convcy the aba�e described property,and no contrary powers or restrictions appear in t6c Trust document,and the 1'rust is in fuU force and effeet. Prepar�d By: Mikell L. St.Germain RECORD&RETURN TO: SfJMERS TITLE COMPANY � 1290 Court Street Rl'�►�"''� �� A� ^��y ; Clearwater,FL 33756 ��"--�-i� l��"'��' (72�441-1088 phone �'�`��`�� `�'y . incidental to the issuance of a title insurance policy. �� " 'zL� �'�� File Nutnber: 1103026C Stm Ht e.com so�►•aeu•6887 Parcel ID#: OS/29/15/54666/003/0050 . a �� WA►l�DEED (INDIVIDUAL) This WARRANTY DEED, dated OS/02/2011 by Emerick Zovko,Trustee of the Edith Foilis Revocable Trust dated August 26, 1992, as amended whose post office address is: hereinafter called the GR.ANTOR,to Brian Shay and Stephanie Shay,husband and wife whose post office address is: 4012 Southwestern Blvd.,Dallas,TX 75225 hereinafter called the GRANTEE: (Wherever used herein the terms "Grantor" and"Grantee" include all parties to this instrument and the heirs, legal representatives and assigns of individuals,and the successors and assigns of corporations.) WITNESSETH: That the GRANTOR,for and in consideration of the sum of$10.00 and other valuable considerations,receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged,hereby�ants,bargains,sells,aliens,remises,releases, • conveys and confirms unto the GRANTEE,all that certain land situate in Pinellas County,Florida,viz: � Lot 5,Block 3,MANDALAY SUBDIVISION,according to the map or plat thereof,as shown on plat recorded in Plat Book 14,Pages 32 through 35,inclusive,of fhe Public Records of Pinellas County,Florida,together with riparian rights appertaining thereto. Property is not the homestead of the Grantor � Grantor has fuU power and authority to convey the above described property,and no contrary powers or restrictions appear in the Trust document,and the Trust is in full force and effect. Y • SUBJECT TO covenants,conditions,resirictions,reservations,limitations, easements and a.greements of record, if any;taxes and assessments for the year 2011 and subsequent ye�rs;and to a11 applicable zoning ordinances and/or restrictions and prohibitions imposed by governmental authorities, if any. TOGETHER with a11 the tenements,hereditaments and appurtenances thereto belonging or in artywise appertaining. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD,the same in fee simple forever. AND THE GRANTOR hereby covenants with said GRANTEE tha.t except as above noted,the GRANTOR is . lawfully seized of said land in fee simple;that the GRANTOR has good right and lawful authority to sell and convey said land;that the GRANTOR hereby fully warrants the tifle to said land and will defend the same against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever. IN WITNESS VJHEREOF,GRANTOR has signed and sealed these presents the date set forth above. SIGNED IN T P SENCE O THE FOLLOWIl�tG WITNESSES: . } + _ L+��R/ii�� W1L11eSS SI �• Print Name: `! , �V Emerick Zovko,Trustee Witness Sign: Print Name: State of Florida County of Pinellas � THE FOREGOING INSTRUMENT was swom and acknowledged before me on 05/02/2011 by: Emerick Zovko,Trustee of the Edith Follis Revocable Trust dated August 26, 1992, as amended, who has produced a drivers license as identification. � Notary SeaUExpiration Date . No ignature�,�kn `f / � � � � tx- 6 h �J� . t�}� /1 MIKELL L ST.QERMAIiv • �� No�►PubRc.State of Flaida � g My�gaipn Expires 09/2A/1 f Cotn�°ro.��ion Mo O[�i i 7�', - � � � � _; ��'�� : '�� _.; / �. �'•�11. � ��I ��rv. - « � �. w� �',, .`� I ;� w >, ' � �. ,. .,. , _�. , 1 � � �, . �� . �}, f.� � ;f . ,' �� v - '<:k. { � .. W A , i - � , � . . . ' ._'�..- - �+�1 � �! • ''.._ \; '��Y � �� , .. `i lA � . ---�' ��.� � '', < � - .�.�r* �-�- � ..� ,._�,��.� � �.. , , . � e,e . ... _ . , _ �_... � .� _ . W •� ;,. -� ;� ,a„ _.. ,�;,,�j '��, � �i ;:� `... �� '� � ' . , .� � ; �_::,.: • : ° _ � . . w +r.. „ - �.. �-� ` � � ' , � � �{ a, __ � �.: � ��' ��+�r' `� '�= .r �'` ,dt,rn,.• . , �tikw.a'� � ' .. '�" `�,' ' ��i ,Q,;;: ° �`�.'�� W i� 'r' .�. �1 •� - � ' � �,� ,-- �� .- �. I.:�- r,�'[._. � ��_� ��i -.+S� i U -�� `iii ,,,,� • y � -� ; , �•�t" t,w,. �r� ;� � _.� _- � p'., .#�� ;. ��<�i ��a '�'•AI�� ry�.� � ��y} ,fgy ...3't i�. : �j 1 . r 1�-�g� x �r"4� 'r a ,yq t'i . #y f tiYA��'� ��kfi��'�.r`.. F 4 ��'''.('�ii� ��`` �a �� '" �,y� t.� �,�.#,�,�w<i + �� - l" " )e.; .fV,t � y ��`� � � .y.� �' ,�� '} Y �� .y.I (n � ��' ,�j�� t. � k$; 1 � ?�R�'�»�i'"�� :`5,� �� 'v�+' ��',�� 4� � �� ;�� `, y^ �. • ,�. � �� . • y. �Q . . , . . . . .'.r..,r.: ..� . . _. ��. � . � �� . ��', ,. . � �' ` Y .� � '�cO #� ; �� ,�,�� ,, '�, � � �. ; �� ,� � u:� �,�� W � �� ,� � I �g� � r j� �� ` �/ F� � � �:"' p"2w �� i IMPACF Ml1RVIN WfNDOWS PITINA COPPER,PAINT GOLOR �R METAL PANELS METAL RCaOF �,,,j__ �_------ -- - - �'d " ' ,� - - -_ _ :_,,. , _� wNi�€s�ueco x -. _ ;,_�- ,� -----,.,_.�_____ i � __:r- � i GEDAR SIDING T.-;`. � , i ; � - -- -- � _ � - CEDAR SOFFITS I - �'` -- - . I � _ � � MECH.EQUIP. SCREEN � , .. i � i � . '=�_ —� � I � � i�l; � � _ -�-� , ,. WHITE STUCCO �. ' L � _ ' : ' � � , � IMPACT WOOD GARAGE DR. " _ t: li . . ,,:, ��I. -_ .i _ , I �. : f � -. ..:. b I = I ; � , ��_ $ �-_ EXISTtN� � � . SID�WAI.K MED.CQLOR IIMESTONE �+. '� � - ,; Q ? � `-*"'-- - — ;.� � � -_ �` -, ��.:. � ,� --' , ,� �_ __ , - . � .. , . � r ' _ ' i GRFEN 4P�10E FQR L{\Nf�SCAPING �, � �`'' �: -_. . . ___ _.. - - ._ __� __- _ . _-- ----- __ _ _ , — __ - �- -�-"" � � klar a�d klar _'_.-_.--- _ .__._"-- _..__._._.. _.. ..__._.._. __.._-—- �-��- architucts inc. c� Is SHAY RESIDENCE CONCEPT EAST ELEVATION U I I I I I i TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY OF 750 ELDORADO AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33767 05-29-15-54666-003-0050 BEACH SAND OF GULF OF MEXICO REF'ERENCE NOTE: PRM TO DISK IS s�R N2°25'25"W 60.00' siR S4°55'53"E 151.73' STATE GRID 5' UE TO CCC LINE PRM SAND DUNE .��• 15-90-DA-09 6� '1�6� �'� °CITY OF R039 PNLS 74 y• 5a � BRASS DISK 60 �- 'I� _ _ _ _ _ '•'• '• SIR _ _ _CLEAR1�fATER °- — — — — — � — s�R N3°09'02"W 60.00' CCCL W� Bnn i-o2 �� N3°09'02"W 661.20' OVERALL o� �o SITE BM ov 60.01' TO LOT 5 �o m Z EL 4.98 ��o��h�, � �` U O 5• SEE NOTE "A" o° �o 0 0° APPROXIMATE J5�' � ° �o� 6 0' W I D E B E A C H .�� 5�7� ACCESS AREA _ y w o0 6• o z � wzo � �' o � W �� o � 69 ° a O �� a � o � r� � Z �oJ � � w � w � ��5 ,� _ 'I� � o � GG W �� o �n MF P � E-' � LOT 5 M . 0 � � VACANT �'�y Z � � Z o� FLOOD ZONE VE m° 5.6 -�.�° BASE ELEVATION 13.0' �o �,� PER FEMA FIRM MAP 0 o LL o �o NUMBER 12103C0102G BUILDING J J m Z DATED 9-3-2003 U� �O Zao � � o U o� o o NOTE: � a, �o CCCL = PINELLAS 60.02 (M) 60.00(P) FN&D 3 �� S�R C O U N T Y C O A S T A L �--- -------- --�—�. . FCM ' WALK N CONSTRUCTION OHW ---------------------------- CONTROL LINE pP PER O.R. BOOK 11760 S2°25'25"E 60.00' PAGES 2687-2693 ELDORADO AVENUE �6�y 3� — — — —�I-6' CENTER OF RIW ELEVATIONS ARE ON NAVD 1988 DATUM USING LEGAL DESCRIPTION: CITY OF CLEARWATER BM LOT 5, BLOCK 3, MANDALAY SUBDIVISION, ACCORDING TO THE I-02 WITH ELEV OF 4.98 MAP OR PLAT THEREOF, AS SHO�PrT ON PLAT RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK FEET, SAME IS SITE 14, PAGES 32 THROUGH 35, INCLUSIVE, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF BENCH MARK SHOWN PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA, TOGETHER �PITH RIPARIAN RIGHTS HEREON APPERTAINING THERETO. NOTE 'B" - REAR SETBACK FROM CCCL AND 752 ELDORADO AVE. RESIDENCE STRUCTURE IS 25.0 FEET �55�`�� ,��o '��`9'��P 5Q0 THIS SURVEY IS MADE FOR THE EXCLUSIVE USE OF 1HE CURRENT OWNERS OF THE Q 1 O� ZO� 4O� PROPERTY AND ALSO THOSE WHO PURCHASE, MORTGAGE OR GUARANTEE THE TiTLE THERETO NATHIN ONE YEAR OF THE FIELD DATE NOTED ON THIS SURVEY. COVERED SCREEN SCREEN SCALE: 1"= ZO� EMRANCE E ENCLOSED p ENCLOSED AR�n � WITH POOL - X - 4' CHAIN LINK FENCE �� 6'WOOD FENCE NOTE: THIS SURVEY WAS PERFORMED WITHOUT THE BENEFlT OF A T1TLE COMMITMENT. NOTES: IN COMPLIANCE WITH F.A.C. 61G17-6.0031-4—E, IF LOCATION OF EASEMENTS OR RIGHTS—OF—WAY OF RECORD, OlHER THAN ' THOSE ON RECORD PLATS, IS REQUIRED, THIS INFORMATION MUST BE FURNISHED TO THE SURVEYOR AND MAPPER. IF APPLICABLE, FENCES SHOWN MEANDER ON OR OFF LJNES. (APPROX.) NO EXCAVATION OR MAPPING OF UNDERGROUND IMPROVEMENTS HAS BEEN PERFORMED. CORNER MARKERS ARE 1/2" DIAMETER UNLESS NOlED OTHERWISE. BASIS OF BEARINGS IS R/W IJNE, USING PLAT BEARINGS OR ASSUMED UNLESS SHOWN OTHERWISE LEGEND: (C) � CALCULATED, C/� WRVE NUMBER . CB� CABLE 80X, LP� LIGHT POLE. C/S � CONCREIE SLAB, CLF� diAIN LINK FENCE. CONC � CONCREfE CSW� CONCRETE SIDEWALK,(D) � D�, DE� DRAINAGE EASDAENT, EB� ELECIRIC BOx, EOW� mGE OF WATER, E/P � EDGE OF PAVEMENT, (� � FlELD,F/C � FENCE CORNER, FqR � FlR CAPPED, FXC � FOUND X CUT, FCM � FWND CONCRETE MONUMENT. FlP � FOUND IRON PIPE, FlR � FOUND IRON ROD, FN � FOUND NAII, FND � FWND NAIL ac DISK GA — GUY ANCHOR, ID � IDENi1FlCAlION. (M) � MEASURm, MH � 11ANHOLE, NCF— NO MARKER FOUND, qiW� OVERHEAD MARE, O/A— OVER ALL, (P) � PLAT, P/E�POOL EQUIP. PP � POWER POLE, POB � POINT OF BEqNNING, POC � POINT OF COMMENCDAENT, PRM � PERMANENT REFERENCE MONUMENT. R/W� RIGHT OF WAY, SIR � SET 1/2'IRON ROD LB 8912, SND = SET NAIL AND DISK LB 6912, 7NF� TRANSFORMFR, TOB� TOP OF BANK, TP� PHONE PEDESTAL, UE � U71L1TY EASEMENT, WB � WATER BOX, WDF� WOOD FENCE Kn ow It N O W� II1 C. I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS SKEfCH OF SURVEY WAS MADE UNDER LOCATION — 2011 HEIDELBERG AVENUE, DUNEDIN, FL � RESPONSIBLE CHARGE AND TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE AND (C)2011 Florida Business Certificate Of Authorization Number LB 6912 FORTH BY THE�IDA OARDEOF'PIROFESSIOHNAL LAND SURVEYO S� IN CHAPTER 61G17-6 FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE FURfHER , THIS CERTIFIED EXCLUSIVELY TO THE BELOW PARTIES DOCUMENT IS ELECTRONICALLY SIGNED AND SE4LED PURSUANT TO SECTION 472.027, OF THE fLORIDA STATUTES AND CHAP'fER �,�.«.K�.r• 61G-17-7.0025 OF THE FLORIDA ADMINISTRATION CODE. ,,��H•HY4° Surveyor&Mapper Number 4636 _'0�ERT��q�',� DATE OF FIELD WORK: 1-20-12 ABBY LUKACS :'�� -� KLAR AND KLAR ARCHITECTS, INC. DA1E SIGNED 1-23-12 :r'y�sTq�'�� ;�o t'p� 3-1-12 MEASURED CCCL SETBACKS ti qJAA 3-7-12 ADDED BEACH ACCESS INFO _..4''�•...;,,,. �Q, ''�.,RVEY� VOICE 727-415-8305 FAX 727-736-2455 FLORIDASURVEYOR@AOL.COM BILL HYATT