FLD2012-01001; 1500 BELCHER RD S; MCDONALDS RESTAURANT , •
�
1500 S BELCHER RD
Date Received: 1/3/2012 12:04:20 PM
McDonalds Res�urant
ZONING DISTRICT: Commercial
LAND USE: Commercial General
ATLAS PAGE: 316B
PLANNER OF RECORD:
PLANNER: Kevin Nurnberger, Planner III
CDB Meeting Date: March 20,2012
Case Number: FLD2012-01001
Agenda Item: E. 1.
Owner: Circle K Stores
Applicant: McDonalds Corporation
Representative: Braulio Grajales, High Point En in�n�
Address: 1500 S. Belcher Road
CITY OF CLEARWATER
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
STAFF REPORT
GENERAL INFORMATION:
REQUEST: Flexible Development approval for a 3,906 square foot restaurant with
drive-thru facilities in the Commercial (C) District with a lot area of
36,313 square feet, a lot width of 171 feet along S. Belcher Road and
189 feet along Nursery Road, front (east) setback of 15 feet (to
proposed pavement) and 39.3 feet (to proposed building), front (north)
setback of 10 feet (to proposed pavement) and 81.1 feet (to proposed
building), side (west) setback of 3.5 feet (to proposed pavement) and
72.2 feet (to proposed building), side (south) setback of 5 feet (to
proposed pavement) and 54 feet (to proposed building), a building
height of 23.4 feet, and 37 off-street parking spaces as a
Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project under the provisions of
Community Development Code Section 2-704.C; and a reduction to the
front (east) perimeter landscape buffer from 15 feet to 3 feet, a
reduction to the front (north) perimeter landscape buffer from 15 feet to
3 feet, a reduction to the side (south) perimeter buffer from 10 feet to 5
feet, and a reduction to the side (west} perimeter buffer from 5 feet to
3.5 feet, a reduction to the foundation plantings from 5 feet to zero feet,
as part of a Comprehensive Landscape Program under the provisions of
Community Development Code Section 3-1202.G.
ZONING DISTRICT: Commercial (C) District
FUTURE LAND USE
PLAN CATEGORY: Commercial General (CG)
PROPERTY USE: Current: Automobile Service Station (vacant)
Proposed: Restaurant
EXISTING North: Commercial (C)District
SURROUNDING Retails Sales and Services
ZONING AND USES: South: Medium High Density Residential (MHDR) District
Attached Dwellings
East: Commercial (C) District
Retail Sales and Services
Community Development Board—March 20,2012
FLD2012-01001 —Page 1 of 10
West: Commercial (C)District
Office
ANALYSIS:
Site Location and Existing Conditions:
The 0.833 acre property is located on the southwest corner at the intersection of Nursery Road
and S. Belcher Road. The site currently consists of a vacant automobile service station and
convenience store with eight fueling stations and 25 parking spaces. This parcel has a lot width
of 171 feet along S. Belcher Road and 189 feet along Nursery Road with direct access to both
streets.
The subject property is bordered on its east side by a bank; and on the south by attached
dwellings. To the north across Nursery Road is a produce stand, and to the east across Belcher
Road is a Walgreens pharmacy.
Development Proposal:
On January 3, 2012, a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project application was submitted to
allow for the development of a 3,906 square foot restaurant with 37 off-street parking spaces and
a side-by side ordering drive-thru lane. All structures on site will be demolished and cleared to
allow for the redevelopment of the property. The project proposes to close the properties eastern
most driveway on Nursery Road and northern most driveway on Belcher Road, as both
driveways are too close to the intersection. The remaining driveways will be improved to current
Code requirements for access. Due to the requested flexibility to the front and side setbacks to
allow for a code compliant parking lot, the development proposal is being reviewed as a
Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project.
The development proposal's compliance with the various development standards of the
Community Development Code (CDC) is discussed below.
Floor Area Ratio (FAR): Pursuant to the Countywide Plan Rules and the CDC Section 2-701.1,
the maximum allowable FAR in the Commercial General (CG) future land use plan category is
0.55. The proposed FAR is 0.108, which is far below what may be permitted based upon the
above Code provision.
Im�ervious Surface Ratio (ISR): Pursuant to the Countywide Plan Rules and CDC Section 2-
701.1, the maximum allowable ISR in the CG future land use plan category is 0.90. The
proposed ISR is 0.79, which is less then what may be permitted based upon the above Code
provision.
Minimum Lot Area and Width: Pursuant to CDC Table 2-704, there is no minimum required lot
area or lot width for a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project. However, for a point of
comparison, the minimum lot area requirement for restaurants in the C District is 10,000 square
feet. The existing lot area for the subject property is 36,313 square feet (0.8333 acres). For
comparative purposes, the minimum lot width requirement for restaurants in the C District is 100
feet. The lot widths along Nursery Road and Belcher Road are 171 feet and 189 feet,
Community Development Board—March 20,2012
FLD2012-01001—Page 2 of 10
respectively. The development proposal exceeds these comparative Code provisions for
restaurants.
Minimum Setbacks: Pursuant to CDC Table 2-704, there are no minimum setback requirements
for a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project. However, for a point of comparison, the
minimum front setback requirement for a restaurant can range between 15 and 25 feet; and the
side setback can range between zero and 10 feet. With regards to building setbacks this proposal
meets the above development standards with front setbacks of 81.1 feet along Nursery Road and
39.3 feet along Belcher Road, a side (south) setback of 54 feet, and a side (west) setback of 72.2
feet.
As set forth in CDC Section 3-903.F, parking lots shall be setback from the front property lines a
distance of 15 feet and shall be set back from all other property lines a distance that is consistent
with the required perimeter landscape buffer width. In regards to this provision the proposal is
deficient in a front (north) setback of 10 feet (to proposed pavement) where 15 feet is required, a
side (west) setback of 3.5 feet (to proposed pavement) where 5 feet is required, and a side
setback of 5 feet (to proposed pavement) where 10 feet is required. The setbacks are requested
to meet provisions set forth for the development of a code compliant parking lot. These setbacks
can be supported based upon positive findings made with regard to CDC Section 2-704.C.
MaXimum Buildin�Hei� Pursuant to CDC Table 2-704, there is no maximum allowable
height for a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project. However, for a point of comparison,
the maximum building height for restaurants can range between 25 and 50 feet. The proposed
building will have a height of 23.4 feet which is well below permitted height provisions based
upon the above Code standards.
Minimum Off-Street Parkin�: Pursuant to CDC Table 2-704,the minimum required parking for a
Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project is determined by the Community Development
Coordinator based on the specific use and/or ITE Manual standards. The off-street parking
requirement for restaurants is between 7 and 15 spaces per 1,000 square feet of gross floor area,
which for a 3,906 square foot restaurant would result in a requirement between 27 and 58 spaces.
As previously noted, 37 parking spaces will be provided on site. For this reason, the applicant
prepared a parking demand study which through on-site analysis of two existing McDonald
�
restaurants located at 18584 US Highway 19 North and 1934 N. Hercules Ave that demonstrated
that the proposed 37 off-street parking spaces (at a 9.47 ratio) will be adequate to meet the
demand of the restaurant during all periods. As these 37 spaces are well within the acceptable
range for restaurants, positive findings can be made with regard to the requested off-street
parking reduction.
In regards to the drive-thru facility, restaurants shall provide sufficient stacking distance to
accommodate eight vehicles as measured from the first point of transaction as set forth in CDC
Section 3-1406. As shown on the site plan, from the first point of transaction the side-by side
ordering drive-thru lane provides enough stacking distance for eleven vehicles which exceeds the
provision.
Community Development Board—March 20,2012
FLD2012-01001 —Page 3 of 10
Sight Visibilit�Trian�1�Pursuant to CDC Section 3-904.A, to minimize hazards at the existing
driveways, no structures or landscaping may be installed which will obstruct views at a level
between 30 inches above grade and eight feet above grade within 20-foot sight visibility
triangles. The proposal was reviewed by the City's Traffic Engineering Department and found to
be acceptable.
Landscapin�: Pursuant to CDC Section 3-1202.D, the request includes a reduction to the front
(east) perimeter landscape buffer from 15 feet to 3 feet (along Belcher Road), a reduction to the
front (north) perimeter landscape buffer from 15 feet to 3 feet (along Nursery Road), a reduction
to the side (west) perimeter landscape buffer from 5 feet to 3.5 feet, a reduction to the side
(south) perimeter landscape buffer from 10 feet to 5 feet through the Comprehensive Landscape
Program. In regards to reductions to the front perimeter buffers, the requested reduction is to the
front slope of the retention pond with a slope of 3:1. At this slope no portion of the retention
pond can be counted towards the width of the buffer; although the width to setback is wider than
the buffer. As such, for the applicants to provide an adequate number of parking spaces on site
in a parking lot that meets the standards set forth for parking spaces and drive aisles in CDC
Section 3-1402.A as well as adequate storm water retention ponds, then the requested reduction
to perimeter buffers are necessary to achieve a functional site design. The requested reductions
to perimeter buffers are acceptable to Staff.
In addition to the above, the development proposal includes a reduction to the foundation
plantings from 5 feet to zero feet for the front building farades facing Nursery Road and S.
Belcher Road. Based upon the submitted site plan, it would be impractical to provide foundation
plantings as providing such plantings would require the reduction of space necessary for building
egress and ingress; it will necessitate an increase in the widths of the sidewalks adjacent to the
building which will reduce the width of drive aisles that meet the minimum standards for drive
aisle widths. Based upon the above, the requested reductions to foundation planting are
acceptable to Staff.
Community Development Board—March 20,2012
FLD2012-01001 —Page 4 of 10
Comprehensive Landscape Program: Pursuant to CDC Section 3-1202.G, the landscaping
requirements contained within the Code can be waived or modified if the application contains a
Comprehensive Landscape Program satisfying certain criteria. The following table depicts the
consistency of the development proposal with those criteria:
Consistent Inconsistent
1. Architectural theme:
a. The landscaping in a comprehensive landscape program shall be designed as a N/A N/A
part of the architectural theme of the principle buildings proposed or developed on
the pazcel proposed for development;or
b. The design, character, location and/or materials of the landscape treatment X
proposed in the comprehensive landscape program shall be demonstrably more
amactive than landscaping otherwise permitted on the parcel proposed for
development under the minimum landscape standazds.
2. Lighting: Any lighting proposed as a part of a comprehensive landscape program is X
automatically controlled so that the lighting is tumed off when the business is closed.
3. Community character: The landscape treatment proposed in the comprehensive X
landscape program will enhance the community character of the City of Clearwater.
4. Properry values: The landscape treatment proposed in the comprehensive landscape X
program will have a beneficial impact on the value of property in the immediate
vicinity of the parcel proposed for development.
5. Special area or scenic corridor plan: The landscape treatment proposed in the X
comprehensive landscape program is consistent with any special area or scenic
corridor plan which the City of Clearwater has prepazed and adopted for the azea in
which the arcel ro osed for develo ment is located.
Solid Waste: The proposal provides a 10.8 foot by 30 foot double dumpster enclosure along the
south property line. Plans indicate this enclosure will be constructed to City standards the
proposal has been found to be acceptable by the City's Solid Waste Department.
Site Li ting: Pursuant to CDC Section 3-1302, the lamp height of the cut-off fixtures shall not
exceed 35 feet or 1 foot in height for each one foot the light fixture is setback from the setback in
CDC Section 3-1202D., whichever is less. The applicant has submitted a photometric sheet that
indicates proposed lamp heights of 25 feet that are within each setback; therefore, the proposed
outdoor lighting fixtures do not comply with the provision. Based on the provision no free
standing cut-off light fixture can be placed in any setback. The applicant will need to revise the
lighting plan by providing ground level landscape type lighting within the setbacks and/or down-
lights on the building that are no more than 18 feet in height or two-thirds the height of the
structure. All outdoor light fixtures shall be located so that objects or lands which are located
beyond the boundaries of the parcel of land are not illuminated to an extent of producing more
than a diffuse shadow.
Code Enforcement Analysis: There are no active Code Enforcement cases far the subject
property.
Community Development Board—March 20,2012
FLD2012-01001 —Page 5 of 10
COMPLIANCE WITH STANDARDS AND CRITERIA:
The following table depicts the consistency of the development proposal with the standards of
the Commercial General (CG) future land use plan category and the Commercial (C) District as
per CDC Section 2-701.1 and Table 2-704:
Standard Proposed Consistent Inconsistent
FAR 0.55 0.108 X
ISR 0.90 0.79 X
Minimum Lot Area N/A 36,313 sq.ft.(.833 acres) X
Minimum N/A Belcher: 171 feet X
Lot Width Nursery: 189 feet X
Minimum Setbacks Front: N/A Belcher: 15 feet(to pavement) X
393 feet(to building)
Nursery: 10 feet(to pavement) X
81.1 feet(to building)
Side: N/A West: 3.5 feet(to pavement) X
72.2 feet(to building)
South: 5 feet(to pavement) X
54 feet(to building)
Maximum Height N/A 23.4feet X
Minimum 7-15 spaces per 1,000 SF GFA 3?parking spaces X
Off-Street Parking (27-58 spaces) (9.47 spaces per 1,000 SF GFA)
Community Development Board—March 20,2012
FLD2012-01001 —Page 6 of 10
COMPLIANCE WITH FLEXIBILITY CRITERIA:
The following table depicts the consistency of the development proposal with the Flexibility
criteria as per CDC Section 2-703.0 (Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project):
Consistent Inconsistent
1. The development or redevelopment is otherwise impractical without deviations from X
the use andlor development standards set forth in this zoning district.
2. The development or redevelopment will be consistent with the goals and policies of X
the Comprehensive Plan, as well as with the general purpose, intent and basic
planning objectives of this Code, and with the intent and purpose of this zoning
district.
3. The development or redevelopment will not impede the normal and orderly X
development and improvement of surrounding properties.
4. Adjoining properties will not suffer substantial detriment as a result of the proposed X
development
5. The proposed use shall otherwise be permitted by the underlying future land use X
category, be compatible with adjacent land uses, will not substantially alter the
essential use characteristics of the neighborhood; and shall demonstrate compliance
with one or more of the following objectives:
a. The proposed use is permitted in this zoning district as a minimum standard,
flexible standard or flexible development use;
b. The proposed use would be a significant economic contributor to the City's
economic base by diversifying the local economy or by creating jobs;
c. The development proposal accommodates the expansion or redevelopment of an
existing economic contributor;
d. The proposed use provides for the provision of affordable housing;
e. The proposed use provides for development or redevelopment in an area that is
characterized by other similar development and where a land use plan
amendment and rezoning would result in a spot land use or zoning designation;
or
£ The proposed use provides for the development of a new and/or preservation of a
working waterfront use.
6. Flexibility with regard to use, lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street X
parking are justified based on demonstrated compliance with all of the following
design objectives:
a. The proposed development will not impede the normal and orderly development
and improvement of the surrounding properties for uses permitted in this zoning
district;
b. The proposed development complies with applicable design guidelines adopted
by the City;
c. The design, scale and intensity of the proposed development supports the
established or emerging character of an area;
d. In order to form a cohesive, visually interesting and attractive appeazance, the
proposed development incorporates a substantial number of the following design
elements:
❑ Changes in horizontal building planes;
❑ Use of architectural details such as columns, cornices, stringcourses,
pilasters,porticos,balconies,railings,awnings,etc.;
0 Variety in materials,colors and textures;
O Distinctive fenestration pattems;
❑ Building step backs;and
❑ Distinctive roofs forms. �
e. The proposed development provides for appropriate buffers,enhanced]andscape
desi and a ro riate distances between buildin s.
Community Development Board—March 20,2012
FLD2012-01001 —Page 7 of 10
COMPLIANCE WITH GENERAL STANDARDS FOR LEVEL TWO APPROVALS:
The following table depicts the consistency of the development proposal with the General
Standards for Level Two Approvals as per CDC Section 3-914.A:
Consistent Inconsistent
1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, X
coverage,density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located.
2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage development and use of X
adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof.
3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons X
residing or working in the neighborhood.
4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. X
5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the X
immediate vicinity.
6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including X
visual,acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts on adjacent properties.
SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION:
The Development Review Committee (DRC) reviewed the application and supporting materials
at its meeting of February 2, 2012, and deemed the development proposal to be legally sufficient
to move forward to the Community Development Board (CDB), based upon the following:
Findin�s of Fact. The Planning and Development Department, having reviewed all evidence
submitted by the applicant and requirements of the Community Development Code, finds that
there is substantial competent evidence to support the following findings of fact:
1. The 0.833 acre property is located on the southwest corner at the intersection of Nursery Road
and S. Belcher Road;
2. That the subject property is located within the Commercial (C) District and the Commercial
General (CG) Future Land Use Plan category;
3. The site presently is developed with an automobile service station, including an existing
1,972 square foot building, gas pumps and canopy;
4. The proposal is to completely redevelop this site by demolishing the existing structures to
permit a 3,906 square foot restaurant with a side-by side ordering drive-thru lane and 37 off-
street parking spaces;
5. The applicant proposes 37 off-street parking spaces at a ratio of 9.47 spaces per 1,000 square
feet of gross floor area that is within the acceptable range for restaurants;
6. The proposal includes closing the eastern driveway on Nursery Road and northern drive-way
on S. Belcher Road;
7. The m�imum allowable FAR for the Commercial General (CG) is 0.55. The proposed FAR
is 0.108;
8. The ma�imum allowable ISR for the Commercial General (CG) is 0.90. The proposed ISR is
0.79;
9. The building addition will be a height of 19.4 feet (to parapet wall) and 23.4 feet (to top of
roof cap element);
10. The proposal includes front setbacks of 81.1 feet (to proposed building) along Nursery Road
and 39.3 feet (to proposed building) along Belcher Road, a side (south) setback of 54 feet (to
proposed building), and a side (west) setback of 72.2 feet(to proposed building);
Community Development Board—March 20,2012
FLD2012-01001 —Page 8 of 10
11. The request includes a reduction to the front (north) landscape perimeter buffer of 3 feet
where 15 feet is required, a reduction to the front (east) landscape perimeter buffer of 3 feet
where 15 feet is required, a side (west) landscape perimeter buffer of 3.5 feet (to proposed
pavement) where 5 feet is required, and a side (south) landscape perimeter buffer of 5 feet(to
proposed pavement) where 10 feet is required, through the Comprehensive Landscape
Program; and
12. There are no active Code Enforcement cases for the subject property.
Conclusions of Law. The Planning and Development Department, having made the above
findings of fact,reaches the following conclusions of law:
l. That the development proposal is consistent with the Standards as per Section 2-701.1 and
Table 2-704 of the Community Development Code;
2. That the development proposal is consistent with the Flexibility criteria as per Section 2-
704.0 of the Community Development Code;
3. That the development proposal is consistent with the General Standards for Level Two
Approvals as per Section 3-914.A of the Community Development Code; and
4. The proposal is consistent with the criteria of the Comprehensive Landscape Program as per
Section 3-1202.G of the Community Development Code.
Based upon the above, the Planning and Development Department recommends APPROVAL of
the Flexible Development approval for a 3,906 square foot restaurant with drive-thru facilities in
the Commercial (C) District with a lot area of 36,313 square feet, a lot width of 171 feet along S.
Belcher Road and 189 feet along Nursery Road, front (east) setback of 15 feet (to proposed
pavement) and 39.3 feet (to proposed building), front (north) setback of 10 feet (to proposed
pavement) and 81.1 feet (to proposed building), side (west) setback of 3.5 feet (to proposed
pavement) and 72.2 feet (to proposed building), side (south) setback of 5 feet (to proposed
pavement) and 54 feet (to proposed building), a building height of 23.4 feet, and 37 off-street
parking spaces as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project under the provisions of
Community Development Code Section 2-704.C; and a reduction to the front (east) perimeter
landscape buffer from 15 feet to 3 feet, a reduction to the front (north) perimeter landscape
buffer from 15 feet to 3 feet, a reduction to the side (south) perimeter buffer from 10 feet to 5
feet, and a reduction to the side (west) perimeter buffer from 5 feet to 3.5 feet, a reduction to the
foundation plantings from 5 feet to zero feet, as part of a Comprehensive Landscape Program
under the provisions of Community Development Code Section 3-1202.G., with the following
conditions:
Conditions of Approval:
1. That building permits be obtained for the demolition of existing structures, parking lot
improvements, landscaping and building improvements;
2. That the final design and color of the building and dumpster enclosure must be consistent
with the conceptual materials, colors and elevations approved by the CDB;
3. That the photometric plan shall be revised to show ground level landscape type lighting
within the setbacks and/or down-lights on the building that are no more than 18 feet in height
or two-thirds the height of the structure rather than the 25 foot in height free standing cut-off
lighting fixtures;
Community Development Board—March 20,2012
FLD2012-01001 —Page 9 of 10
4. That a photometric plan shall be submitted that shows all outdoor light fixtures shall be
located so that objects or lands which are located beyond the boundaries of the parcel of land
are not illuminated to an extent of producing more than a diffuse shadow;
5. That prior to the issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall comply with all
engineering comments;
6. That prior to the issuance of any building permits, the applicant shall provide a copy of an
approved right-of-way permit from Pinellas County for any improvements in Nursery Road
(C.R. 474) and Belcher Road(C.R. 501); and
7. Prior to the issuance of building permits, the Fire Department may require the provision of a
Water Study performed by a Fire Protection Engineer in order to ensure that adequate water
supply is available and to determine is any upgrades are required by the developer due to the
impact of the project. The water supply must be able to support the needs of any required fire
sprinkler, standpipe, and/or fire pump. If a fire pump is required, then the water supply must
be able to supply 150% of its rated capacity.
�..-
Prepared by Planning and Development Department Staff: %
K�v' .Nurnberger, Planner III
ATTACHMENTS:Location Map;Aerial Map;Zoning Map;Existing Sunounding Uses Map;and Photographs
Community Development Board—March 20,2012
FLD2012-01001 —Page 10 of 10
Kevin W.Nurnberger
100 S Myrtle Avenue
Clearwater,FL 33756
727-562-4567ext2502
kevin.nurnber e�r(a�myclearwater.com
PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE
Planner III March 2011 to present
Planner II October 2010 to March 2011
City of Clearwater, Clearwater, Florida
Duties include performing the technical review and preparation of staff reports for various land
development applications, the organization of data and its display in order to track information and
provide status reports, and making presentations to various City Boards and Committees.
Planner
County of York, Yorktown, Virginia 2007 to 2009
Reviewed residential, commercial and mixed use development site plans to ensure compliance with
planning, zoning, subdivision, historic preservation, and environmental standards as well as design
criteria, specifications, regulations, codes and ordinances. Led pre-application meetings with residents,
neighborhood organizations, contractors, and developers regarding future projects which included state
and local government agencies.
Site Assistant
Gahan and Long Ltd, Belfast, Northern Ireland 2006 to 2007
Enforced Article 3 of the Planning Order (NI) with land owners, developers and district councils on
procedures relating to archaeological and built heritage remains on proposed development sites. On site
assistant to project manager during the archeological process throughout the pre-development stage.
Development Planner
Yersar Inc, Fort Story/Fort Eustis, Virginia 2005 to 2006
Developed survey strategies for the Cultural Resource Manager by reviewing local and state planning
documents, the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Preservation Planning on Federal installations,
the Virginia Department of Historic Resources, the Virginia Department of Transportation plan, and
Virginia Power's public utility plan in the predevelopment stages of new development and building
expansion projects to ensure protection of historic properties.
City Planner
City Planning Commission, New Orleans, Louisiana 2000 to 2005
Primary subdivision planner assisting applicants throughout the subdivision process in accordance with
the zoning and subdivision regulations of the City of New Orleans. Reviewed various zoning and
conditional use applications. Prepared and presented staff reports to the City Planning Commission and
Board of Zoning Adjustments.
EDUCATION
University of New Orleans,LA
MA Urban and Regional Planning(2004)
Staxe University of New York at Buffalo,NY
BA Anthropology(1999)
= a �,� VIOLA pR � CLAIBORNE
_�--� �'P OQ- O�'
y OAK GROVE DR MORNINGSIDE DR \�tGS y �
� �. CORONET LN Q o �
cn = z
DIPLOMAT DR eURTIS • DR JV ,� Q
� 'Q �.4 � Z O
� � �=�'¢�'� ' � a s
a
' � � ENVOY ❑ CUR71S "' DR S U = z m
' _ ° � , °"`.; _ : .. , : ° . 3 a�
CT � ;_'AL�MF�L�II�A`,' `�� ,' ' . : WILLIAMS DR
��°� � � ��-. ��, � � r-
� .: � °
°a5 . Q ATTACHE � `�SRE��ANA DR � ' N
ug° ' � �> � T ¢
�
Q CT � �A• CL��'�tINA pR: � X � �
° � g Ua
w .. .. a' �O : � � �.
o /� W �
IMPERIAL T WAY _ � � ' { Z �
- 3 U . �; Z U� p W ..
�
� _ W ..� � O .O Q � _ �,.
, NURSERY � RD, CR-474 �'� U
, � � �� y
� W
w � �
0 U a
� OAKF�RIA DR 0 g �se�
- W 3 W C�
° PROJECT °�.�,.�m
?, , S�TE F'� .O °' HAYANA.
.. . � ...... . .. �� ��
� . ..:::....::.......: �
� :.::.::::...:..::..
.� � ....... ..:....... : �
... . ..:.:....:
' ..{{.s•.•;::::�'r.::• ..,...., ;'• � ... _ Preserve L
�" .. ....•::':. y .
�'� -`p � .WISTFUL � � � � �"9� `$AIV7A..
., �. �:....'•...:•'.:.•:•.::'{ . .. .
. , ,•.•.:....;,:•, , '• •
.�, �
..�:. . _ �- ... .....';`..
..�,.:.'..
•• ...
.... ...
....•,.
- ' � VISTA DR
... . .. .,. ,w.;�; �� - �: �
... -�....:::.•...�.�...:.... �
. ...::...........
......:..... ..... ... . ....:; ..............
. ....�.•:•:... ..:.r
..,-•• •
. ...... ... .... ..:.:.. ...:?,,.�
�n'-vcae.w..
.,
................ . :. :' ......:;....�.•:•::...;...::::.t�•::::. . � �"�.,.�R':....�
••�::..•...:........
. . ..;•,.•
.. . . . . ,:..,....
. . . . •..::... •
•::.. .....
... .......: , ,....�_..
•...•'.•.....•..:. . �:.:..".'r�••.:::::.:...:..}.....�...,�,...
, .. ...... . . .... � �.
..•..•........ ..... .......:{7C•.�........ . "•'. .. ...�. � ......... �.:.,, �
................ ... . , •.
.:::....:.:.:....::'.�..::...:•:....�....:,.:......:�'.'.::::::'._:':':.:::i'... .:...........,:�:.:..•�....•::.......•.....•....:..:.....:•.'.:..•.::'.:.,.:.......•.....•.......•
':,`�`�•,�::;-S�;r.'.--.-:?-;:�w:;.
LOCATION
Owner: Circle K Stores Case: FLD2012-01001
Site: 1500 South Belcher Road Property Size: 0.833 acres �39,313 sq. ft.)
PIN: 24-29-15-00000-440-0100 Atlas Page: 316B
1449
1451
1453
1455
f463 � �
1465 0 �'
1467 �
1482 1469 z ?
1484 �471
1486
1488 1475
1490 1477
1481
,492 HDR
o m 1494 � o
N N 1qSB I 14H9 N
1496
NU Y RD
:lsot�. ^ � �, � �
� yQ'j N +jj N /y t�qj Q
��f�•�¢••� N N � 'fJ� �L N N
W N
;�a�ar,' _
. . r� U
W
1505 M
��%� `° 1502 m N
. O
' �°'{51�� � �_,� •.
� •°�•' •.
-��525;.�� MHDR .
'�1594�a•� i .' •• ,
1545 ,
• •°N.
°�5�i3°• �.. � .. D
j• •• 1550 I •v ' •.. • '
:;Y$4��' .. • . ... '' •• �
'1��1,`. ••• �.
�I .. � . .. •
ZONING
Owner: Circle K Stores Case: FLD20 1 2-0 1 00 1
Site: 1500 South Belcher Road Property Size: 0.833 acres (39,313 sq.ft.)
PtN: 24-29-15-00000-440-0100 Atlas Page: 3168
1449
1451 �
1453
1455 �
1463 � �
1465 � ; �
"�02 1487 � `
1484 14B9 ? ?
��8 A°�0> 1475 I
1490 1477 9 � �Q
1481 �
1492 � r �
� L70272 �
I
I
°n n 1494 O � o
N N 1498 avos 1499 � N
1496 �
NURSERY RD
� s $ � � $ �,
a
:�s,ow;.,.;:•.' ,� � �, O
�
. • � � N N 'I50O �/y . M
•,r'.•��1•. N �y �L • N 33/03
;°9807, aaoz O W - avaz
aaoi = � � ui
,',�� � �06219 �
• • h
v .'�a° 1502 m 1 N O
,°�'.�a.�°, y i
o v�i ' '•` O I ;�. .
..'� S�d;�!. auoa ��', '.. . .'
..�ti
.;n°
.'�°�;,l+a�t�' _
•�e . ;S+ .�o.'
°���° 4.8 A c cc� .
:�% ..
'�4r31�• . 1545 '��� , • �
'�. �� ',N' .a�es�'� .
°a�a3; .. •
�. ..
f• .� � - � �.• . .�.• .
�&' L07155 � 1550 ' '
':.'[5d$.: .. .. '.. `��'�'� .. .' '.
'•::s::�.:::'�;�:�:•.��' � ' .� .' °•'•.' ..
:r::::'::•:.. j ���,.. ....
'.';:7:�'.:.'.��}::��•���:'�:::•., i ;9�d3l.'.: .2;$5p�.�.'.{1��:,:° �,
I .. � . ".. •
'���'� I
EXISTING COND►TIONS
Owner: Circle K Stores Case: FLD20 1 2-0 1 00 1
Site: 1500 South Belcher Road Property Size: 0.833 acres (39,313 sq. ft.)
PIN: 24-29-15-00000-440-0100 Atlas Page: 316B
. �� �rr^^ : ^ � �i �` � t
. .
. ... . /'�a,f�^' 'i� � � � ,�t e
��� �� y ,.�q f � ���'��^� ��j � �..� t� y{�A, �
'�. ' � ��1 ,�� T A "�� Ii �1"`
' � 5r# ' #�F,p���F���` ,t� ^ �`' �a1 ���,. '� . ?`�` �
fi +p ;
A1r-�� � R! . �.,
t ,: � � �1�'1 ��..� 9 ..� i� �' •� � ar
�. r*� . . - �\'1'�a9S"� . �'�_ .
� —�
�;��_� . � �' +f�'A�I�/�/'�`.�i�I►r � �e � � 'O � '. �. � �z���
��I �i y � .�..�,�RFF!'�le/' �
� � ';. • � ,r 1��1�y�, R y � , '� � ,� �«: ��
� �t �'��'7�t � t u 5
. � � 'r . . �,r
. �h
�
1
' � f
�T�. !� ,q f . `/
` � � �. � � � • R,� ��: i
$' � . � d..4 . ..•..� �q � � . ..-��- ,eI .,Y� b �' � Iv.
� i �1!' �� � ' � .: n .. '����,..J. ' , �. JK�� l 1
. ��f � � � �, � � I �:,,, �,, e •�t - , '► �
���� ' : � °� �� �, �a� �� "°�'� .w ' � Q � � '��; ,� . �����
�i�� 's" ` A � fi' �j � y�
4�� 4�"� r � ��'� �' ,T',`M + � i�s��•, r���"�'��'� t•
� .
� • '
ria,: � .•.-.;�,. . � ., .. . . ; 0 , . . �.
. ,L.,
� . �\�L��\�L � . . ��...,.� � .
' ! AA i!�
_ — ..
,,� �,y; •., �
.. _
� . �...k',� •' , - ��! , I f�a°a'"',�`u �s !� � ,�
„ ,
�� �w `a..�' �l ' /�' �� 7��' � � y^I
a r �
. �. _ ' _ � � -�`1 T, ,f� � Cl, � � �a' �
.
y � ", f` ,=! •' ��
. �
. . . , � ,�
, �r � ,� � _} � ., � J �� �.; �4� �;�
,. �
� , _.. � � :y �' ` . �a -�� A^ 3 �� ��.
� - �
, � ■ � � M , � . . J � �
¢ i J .
� , �
,.r tM < ��J' � ;�',,y ,� ��i`�5�6;'.�i:
_� �i�; ------^�°'�- ' ' .J +� '�� � � iw
• . ,
i. x , , ll
� .. ,., , , �
,ti.� �� � "�!� - � ��,� .I �,�
�' ,�� � , � . � �r �,
,
.,• r
r;� � � i i
� il„�:. � � � " ' �%� �
�... � .� ■ . ,�. (� .:���An .i�r� '
f �...�y . . � `�p �.. +.1� ��� � i !�
„
. ,�
�"s: .. 1.9i� ^w'- ■ � ..x. x
�� _
.
� �-� .�..,,b Y • � ` ' �.
� * �t' I � � ' ��'`,� _�i � ,?'
�, ;
_> �% .�y.. � k'�r°t�
� '� '1�'�.« � � � ^
r� '
�, , 5 a,,
,
�r S ,,.`�� � .�' `k '� �;
ti` s •
. 1! �" �� ��s �
� � ��`�R ..„: � � �. ,.x, �.
� F�4.� �� '�' �,� ��.�
� �•� � ... �.k: , ' � �� �/ � •• f
.i�_ � �>�.r'1".'� �'��l4 � M .1 ��' N + *..�.
� �
•� �
� T �' .. .
��r.. �ri'� � . 1
k
.w,
.,
� : .
.. .. � �� , i .,.. . �
� ` ._.+v •=h✓_M_ �..
�_,.� _ .�.. . . . � ".._.�� . :_. ��i1..,.�_. -.•_� � . .��. . .. ..,' .�. _ .
AERIAL
Owner: Circle K Stores Case: FLD2012-01001
Site: 1500 South Belcher Road Property Size: 0.833 acres (39,313 sq. ft.)
PIN: 24-29-15-00000-440-0100 Atlas Page: 316B
: �
k
)
�
ti
+� � � �
�
j � =
.- T
u i
5 I�-
� : ,
. �� ,'�R'a �..,. r ._,.. _.._:.
y R
b .��- _ � ' � �
ytk t�. .,._. � � . �„ .r,
E i��t��� � . . .. . } .,„I� I� t I".
I•
�
t
" �
..�,�_-... ��`'° ,
f �. � :, .
. .
, �.
,
_.„ �
�
, � �<r, � i��V�`��. i�l ii i���i! 4
�.
�:
View of subject property from Nursery Road and Belcher Looking east along Nursery Road and subject property.
Road intersection.
A �. �
� :��z ..
�
; • �,
�;, s -
� , ;� _ � _- :,_p �.
�..�,. i, - �� �'� �'� � ... .
. „
, ,�, w _ _
..
I; ,�-.,�� . - 9 O
; <.+.�� ' i r
,, _, —
, e
..�. , . , �;z_ w_
�. _
. ;.
.. �. . ..,u� �
4
�� k .�At� �. _.-, `.`
'. u�.:..� y t•, ,�g .. � .�..
�.. �� .k� ��. ..
'3 �III���+III ����I� 11 �I'i�I '
,. � 4 I ���.1 .� .y^.:
A,
A �' � .
�� :'v kt� �� �.
.,#. �� _ . '�'� .. +
� �
� a
.
Looking south along Belcher Road from subject properiy. Looking west along Nursery Road from subjcct properry
,;:
4 ;;'� s `� ';e
�� , k �6 ��� �,, ��` e �
3
�� � k,-�.
� ��� ,
.
�I .
���.��,_ �ti `� �_# 1� �� ,', - __
� , . . � .__ �
f ,� ,
�;
. aw,, � �
� . ,.
- .. ; _ .. wi�,, w , �.v '
ftf �—_ 4
����
�w. '" ,
x �i�,�,�,��f� I� h����' �i�i, li ����, � li ivi�� � `y
Looking north along Belcher Road from subject properiy Subject properiy side(south)property line adjacent to
attached dwellings.
1500 South Belcher Road
FLD2012-01001
r ,
� Planning Department CASE#:
�✓������ 100 South Myrtle Avenue RECEIVED BY(staff initials):
r Clearwater, Florida 33756 DATE RECEIVED:
�; Telephone: 727-562-4567
Fax: 727-562-4865
� SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION
� SUBMIT 14 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION-Plans and
application are required to be collated,stapled,and folded into sets
� SUBMIT FIRE PRELIMARY SITE PLAN:;200.00
1� SUBMIT APPLICATION FEE$ 1,4 O 5 . O O
* NOTE:15 TOTAL SETS OF INFORMATION REQUIRED (APP�ICATIONS PLUS SITE PLAN SETS)
FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION
Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project
(Revised 07/11/2008)
�PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT�
A. APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A)
APPLICANTNAME: CIRCLE K STORES, INC
MAILING ADDRESS: 12 911 N. TELECOM PARKWAY TAMPA FLORIDA 3 3 6 3 7
PHONENUMBER: ($13) 910-6885 FAXNUMBER: ($13) 910-6912
CELL NUMBER EMAIL:
PROPERTYOWNER(S): CIRCLE K STORES INC C 0 REAL ESTATE PROPERTY MANAGER
List ALL owners on the deed
AGENT NAME: $Rp,ULIO GRAJALES P.E. HIGH POINT ENGINEERING
MAILINGADDRESS: 5300 W. CYPRESS STREET, SUITE 282, TAMPA . FLORIDA 33607
PHONENUMBER: ($13) 644-8333 FAXNUMBER: ($13) 644-7000
CE��NuMaeR: EMAi�: gGRAJALESQHPE-FL.COM
B. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A)
PROJECT NAME: MCDONALDS RESTAURANT PROJECT VALUATION: $ 1, O O O, O O O
STREETADDRESS 1502 S. BELCHER ROAD CLEARWATER FLORIDA 33764
PARCELNUMBER(S): 24-29-15-00000-440-0100
PARCEL SIZE(acres): 0 .8 3 3 PARCEL SIZE(square feet): 3 6, 313
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: SEE ATTACHED
PROPOSED USE(S): RESTAURANT
DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST: SEE ATTACHED
Specifically identify the request
(include number of units or square
footage of non-residentiai use and all
requested code deviations;e.g.
reduction in required number of
parking spaces,specific use,etc.)
C:\Documents and Settings\derek.ferguson\Desktop�pianning dept forms 0708\Comprehensive Infill Project(FLD)2008 07-11.doc
Page 1 of 8
DOES THIS APPLICATION INVOLVE THE TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS (TDR), A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED PLANNED UNI
DEVELOPMENT,OR A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED(CERTIFIED)SITE PLAN? YES_ NO� (if yes,attach a copy of the applicable documents)
C. PROOF OF OWNERSHIP: (Code Section 4-202.A.5)
� SUBMIT A COPY OF THE TITLE INSURANCE POLICY, DEED TO THE PROPERTY OR SIGN AFFIDAVIT ATTESTING OWNERSHIP (see
page 7)
D. WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 3-913.A)
� Provide complete responses to the six(6)GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA—Explain how each criteria is achieved,in detail:
1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale,bulk,coverage,density and character of adjacent properties in which it
is located.
SEE ATTACHED
2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buiidings or significantly
impair the value thereof.
SEE ATTACHED
3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the heaith or safety of persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use.
SEE ATTACHED
4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion.
SEE ATTACHED
5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development.
SEE ATTACHED
6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects,including visual,acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts,on
adjacent properties.
SEE ATTACHED
C:\Documents and Settings\derek.ferguson\Desktop�planning dept forms 0708\Comprehensive Infiil Project(FLD)2008 07-11.doc
Page 2 of 8
' �
WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project Criteria)
� Provide complete responses to the six(6)COMPREHENSIVE INFILL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT CRITERIA—Explain how each criteria is
achieved,in detaiL•
1. The development or redevelopment is otherwise impractical without deviations from the use and/or development standards set forth in this
zoning district.
SEE ATTACHED
2. The development or redevelopment will be consistent with the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan, as well as with the general
purpose,intent and basic planning objectives of this Code,and with the intent and purpose of this zoning district
SEE ATTACHED
3. The development or redevelopment will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of surrounding properties.
SEE ATTACHED
4. Adjoining properties will not suffer substantial detriment as a result of the proposed development.
SEE ATTACHED
5. The proposed use shall otherwise be permitted by the underlying future land use category, be compatible with adjacent land uses, will not
substantially alter the essential use characteristics of the neighborhood; and shall demonstrate compliance with one or more of the following
objectives:
a. The proposed use is permitted in this zoning district as a minimum standard,flexible standard or flexible development use;
b. The proposed use would be a significant economic contributor to the City's economic base by diversiTying the local economy or by creating
jobs;
c. The development proposai accommodates the expansion or redevelopment of an existing economic contributor;
d. The proposed use provides for the provision of affordable housing;
e. The proposed use provides for development or redevelopment in an area that is characterized by other similar development and where a
land use plan amendment and rezoning would result in a spot land use or zoning designation;or
f. The proposed use provides for the development of a new and/or preservation of a working watertront use.
SEE ATTACHED
6. Flexibility with regard to use,lot width,required setbacks,height and off-street parking are justified based on demonstrated compliance with all of
the following design objectives:
a. The proposed development will not impede the normal and orderiy development and improvement of the surrounding properties for uses
permitted in this zoning district;
b. The proposed development complies with applicable design guidelines adopted by the City;
c. The design,scale and intensity of the proposed development supports the established or emerging character of an area;
d. in order to form a cohesive,visually interesting and attractive appearance,the proposed development incorporates a substantial number of
the following design elements:
❑ Changes in horizontal building planes;
❑ Use of architectural details such as columns,cornices,stringcourses,pilasters,porticos,balconies,railings,awnings,etc.; .
❑ Variety in materials,colors and textures;
❑ Distinctive fenestration patterns;
❑ Building stepbacks;and
❑ Distinctive roofs forms.
e. The proposed development provides for appropriate buffers,enhanced landscape design and appropriate distances between buildings.
SEE ATTACHED
C:\Documents and Settings\derek.ferguson\Desktop�planning dept forms 0708\Comprehensive Infiil Project(FLD)2008 07-11.doc
Page 3 of 8
E. STORMWATER PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteria
Manual and 4-202.A.21)
� A STORMWATER NARRATIVE MUST BE SUBMITTED WITH ALL APPLICATIONS.All appiications that involve addition
or modification of impervious surtace, including buildings, must include a stormwater plan that demonstrates compliance with the City of
Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteria manuai.A reduction in impervious surface area does not qualify as an exemption to this requirement.
� If a plan is not required,the narrative shall provide an explanation as to why the site is exempt.
� At a minimum,the STORMWATER PLAN shall include the following;
� Existing topography extending 50 feet beyond all property lines;
� Proposed grading including finished floor elevations of all structures;
� All adjacent streets and municipal storm systems;
� Proposed stormwater detention/retention area including top of bank,toe of slope and outlet control structure;
� A narrative describing the proposed stormwater control pian including all calculations and data necessary to demonstrate compliance with
the City manual.
� Proposed stormwater detention/retention area including top of bank,toe of slope and outlet control structure;
¢� Signature and seal of Florida Registered Professional Engineer on all plans and calculations.
❑ COPY OF PERMIT INQUIRY LETTER OR SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT (SWFWMD) PERMIT
SUBMITTAL(SWFWMD approval is required prior to issuance of City Building Permit),if applicable
❑ ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF STORMWATER PLAN REQUIREMENTS(Applicant must initial one of the following):
Stormwater plan as noted above is inGuded
Stormwater plan is not required and explanation narrative is attached. At a minimum, a grading plan and finished floor
X elevations shall be provided.
CAUTION — IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A STORMWATER PLAN
AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED,APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY
MAY OCCUR.
If you have questions regarding these requirements,contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at(727)562�750.
F. SUPPLEMENTAL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 4-202.A)
l� SIGNED AND SEALED SURVEY(including legal description of property)—One original and 14 copies;
� TREE SURVEY (including existing trees on site and within 25'of the adjacent site, by species, size (DBH 4"or greater), and location,
including drip lines and indicating trees to be removed)—p/ease design around the existing trees;
� TREE INVENTORY; prepared by a"certified arborist", of all trees 4" DBH or greater, reflecting size, canopy(drip lines)and condition of
such trees;
� LOCATION MAP OF THE PROPERTY;
� PARKING DEMAND STUDY in conjunction with a request to make deviations to the parking standards(ie. Reduce number of spaces).
Prior to the submittal of this application,the methodology of such study shall be approved by the Community Development Coordinator and
shali be in accordance with accepted traffic engineering principles. The findings of the study will be used in determining whether or not
deviations to the parking standards are approved;
� GRADING PLAN,as applicable;
N/A PRELIMINARY PLAT,as required(Note: Building permits will not be issued until evidence of recording a final plat is provided);
N�A COPY OF RECORDED PLAT,as applicable;
C:\Documents and Settings\derek.ferguson�Desktop�planning dept forms 0708\Comprehensive infill Project(FLD)2008 07-11.doc
Page 4 of 8
G. SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A)
� SITE PLAN with the following information(not to exceed 24"x 36"):
X Index sheet referencing individual sheets included in package;
X North arrow;
X Engineering bar scale(minimum scale one inch equals 50 feet),and date prepared;
X All dimensions,
X Footprint and size of all EXISTING buildings and structures;
X Footprint and size of all PROPOSED buildings and structures;
X All required setbacks;
X All existing and proposed points of access;
X All required sight triangles;
identification of environmentaliy unique areas, such as watercourses, wetlands, tree masses, and specimen trees, inGuding
X description and location of understory,ground cover vegetation and wildlife habitats,etc;Location of all public and private easements;
X Location of all street rights-of-way within and adjacent to the site;
Location of existing public and private utilities,including fire hydrants,storm and sanitary sewer lines,manholes and lift stations,gas
X and water lines;
�{ All parking spaces,driveways,loading areas and vehicular use areas;
X Depiction by shading or crosshatching of all required parking lot interior landscaped areas;
Location of all solid waste containers,recyGing or trash handling areas and outside mechanical equipment and all required screening
X {per Section 3-201(D)(i)and Index#701);
X Location of all landscape material;
X Location of all onsite and offsite storm-water management facilities;
X Location of all outdoor lighting fi�ctures;
X Location of all existing and proposed sidewalks;and
Floor plan typicals of buildings for all Level Two approvals. A floor plan of each floor is required for any parking garage requiring a
X Level Two approvaL
� SITE DATA TABLE for existing,required,and proposed development,in written/tabular form:
EXISTING REQUIRED PROPOSED
X Land area in square feet and acres; 3 6, 313/0 . 8 3 3 3 6, 313/0 .8 3 3
��Number of EXISTING dwelling units;
�A Number of PROPOSED dwelling units;
X Gross floor area devoted to each use; 2, 10 7 3, 9 0 6
Parking spaces: total number, presented in tabular form with the
X number of required spaces; 2 5 5 8 3 7
Total paved area, including all paved parking spaces&driveways,
X expressed in square feet&percentage of the paved vehicular area; 2 5, 4 21 21,414
Official records book and page numbers of all existing utility
DT� easement;
X Buiiding and structure heights; 15 . 5 0 19.3 3
X Impermeable surface ratio(I.S.R.);and 0 .8 2 6 0 .7 9 6
X Fioor area ratio(F.A.R.)for all nonresidential uses. 0 . 0 5 8 0 .10 8
¢� REDUCED COLOR SITE PLAN to scale(8'/�X 11);
❑ FOR DEVELOPMENTS OVER ONE ACRE,provide the following additional information on site pian:
N/A One-foot contours or spot elevations on site;
Offsite elevations if required to evaluate the proposed stormwater management for the parcel;
All open space areas;
Location of all earth or water retaining walls and earth berms;
Lot lines and building lines(dimensioned);
Streets and drives(dimensioned);
Building and structural setbacks(dimensioned);
Structural overhangs;
C:\Documents and Settings\derek.ferguson\Desktop�planning dept forms 0708\Comprehensive Infill Project(FLD)2008 07-11.doc
Page 5 of 8
H. LANDSCAPING PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-1102.A)
� IANDSCAPE PLAN with the following information(not to exceed 24"x 36"):
X All existing and proposed structures;
X Names of abutting streets;
X Drainage and retention areas including swales,side slopes and bottom elevations;
X Delineation and dimensions of all required perimeter landscape buffers;
X Sight visibility triangles;
X Delineation and dimensions of all parking areas including landscaping islands and curbing;
Existing trees on-site and immediately adjacent to the site,by species,size and locations,including driplines(as indicated on required
X tree survey);
Location, size, and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, indicated by a key relating to the plant
X schedule;
Plant schedule with a key(symbol or label)indicating the size,description,specifications,quantities,and spacing requirements of all
X existing and proposed landscape materials,including botanical and common names;
Typical planting details for trees, palms, shrubs and ground cover plants including instructions,soil mixes, backfilling, mulching and
X protec4ive measures;
Interior landscaping areas hatched and/or shaded and Iabeled and interior landscape coverage,expressing in both square feet and
X percentage covered;
�� Conditions of a previous development approval(e.g.conditions imposed by the Community Development Board);
X Irrigation notes.
� REDUCED COLOR LANDSCAPE PLAN to scale(8 Y:X 11);
� COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM application, as applicable. Landscape associated with the Comprehensive Landscape
Program shall exceed minimum Code requirements to offset the areas where minimum Code will not be met.
I. BUILDING ELEVATION PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A.23)
� BUILDING ELEVATION DRAWINGS—with the foilowing information:
X All sides of all buiidings
� Dimensioned
X Colors(provide one full sized set of colored elevations)
X Materials
�l REDUCED BUILDING ELEVATIONS—same as above to scale on 8'/:X 11
J. SIGNAGE: (Division 19.SIGNS/Sectlon 3-1806)
� All EXISTING freestanding and attached signs; Provide photographs and dimensions (area, height, etc.), indicate whether they will be
removed or to remain.
� All PROPOSED freestanding and attached signs; Provide details including location, size, height, colors, materiais and drawing;
freestanding signs shall include the street address(numerals)
N�A Comprehensive Sign Program application,as applicable(separate application and fee required).
❑ Reduced signage proposal(8'/:X 11) (color),if submitting Comprehensive Sign Program application.
N/A
C:\Documents and Settings\derek.fergusonlDesktop�planning dept forms 0708\Comprehensive Infill Project(FLD)2008 07-11.doc
Page 6 of 8
K. TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY: (Section 4-202.A.13 and 4-801.C)
$I Include if required by the Traffic Operations Manager or his/her designee or if the proposed development:
■ Will degrade the acceptable level of service for any roadway as adopted in the Comprehensive Plan.
• Wiil generate 100 or more new vehicle directional trips per hour and/or 1000 or more new vehicle trips per day.
■ Wiii affect a nea�by roadway segment andlor intersection with five(5)reportable accidents within the prior twelve(12)month period or
that is on the City's annual list of most hazardous intersections.
Trip generation shall be based on the most recent edition of the lnstitute of Transportation Engineer's(ITE)Trip General Manual.
The Tra�c Impact Study must be prepared in accordance with a "Scoping Meeting" held with the Traffic Operations Manager and the
Planning DepartmenYs Deveiopment Review Manager or their designee(727-562-4750)
Refer to Section 4-801 C of the Community Development Code for exceptions to this requirement.
� Acknowledgement of traffic impact study requirements(Applicant must initial one of the following):
X Traffic Impact Study is included.The study must include a summary table of pre-and post-deveiopment leveis of senrice for all
roadway legs and each tuming movement at all intersections identified in the Scoping Meeting.
Traffic Impact Study is not required.
CAUTION — IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A TRAFFIC IMPACT
STUDY AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND
SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR.
If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 562-
4750.
L. FIRE FLOW CALCULATIONS/WATER STUDY:
Provide Fire Flow Calculations.Water Study by a FIRE PROTECTION ENGINEER to assure an adequate water supply is available and to determine if
any upgrades are required by the deveiope�due to the impact of this project. The water supply must be able to support the needs of any required fire
sprink�er,standpipe and/or fire pump. If a fire pump is required the water supply must be able to supply 150%of its rated capacity. Compliance with
the 2004 Florida Fire Prevention Code to include NFPA 13,MFPA 14,NFPA 20,NFPA 291,and MFPA 1142(Annex H)is required.
� Acknowiedgement of fire flow calculations/water study requirements(Applicant must initiai one of the following):
Fire Flow Calculations/Water Study is included.
` X Fire Flow Calculations/Water Study is not required.
CAUTION — IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A FIRE FLOW
CALCULATIONS/ WATER STUDY AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE
RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR.
If you have questions regarding these requirements,contact the City Fire Prevention Department at(727)562-4334.
M. SIGNATURE:
I,the undersigned,acknowiedge that all representations made STATE OF FLORIDA,COUNTY OF PINELLA
in this application are true and accurate to the best of my Sworn to and subscribed before me this '�Y day of
knowledge and authorize Cify representatives to visit and !U� A.D.20 1.3— to me and/or by
photograph the property described in this application. �� ( J�(;C� ,wh2,is personaliv k�q„wn_has
produced
as identification.
.'-.-L-��.�i'.,��'-��il /�.� f-�����— �
public,"
Si�l�����owner or�epresentative My commission expires:
�{'� - r�'DI t?'".
C:\Documents and Settingslderek.fergusonlDesktop\planning dept forms 0708\�g�ipfen�f}si�r�31�iU�P�I�r4S�F��y��2008 07-11.doc
Page 7 of 8 � �;���
?�3Pid ,
:t,r,r�c��ss�ou;4 DD765417
�.�.��.x�i�es: fiPR.2S,2012
Rr1*11)�.D T'IIRU ATL.4NCIC DONDG�IG CO3 INC.
� , , .
N. AFFIDAVIT TO AUTHORIZE AGENT:
1. Provide names of all property owners on deed–PRINT full names:
CIRCLE K STORES, INC _ _
2. That(I am/we are)the owner(s)and record titie holder(s)of the foliowing described property(address or general location):
1502 S . BELCHER ROAD, CLEARWATER� FLORIDA 33764 _
3. That this property constitutes the property for which a request for a:(desc�ibe request)
MCDONALDS RESTAURANT
4. That the undersigned(has/have)appoinied and(does/do)appoint:
BRAULIO GRAJALES, P.E. / HIGH POINT ENGINEERING, INC _
as(his/their)agent(s)to execute any petitions or other documents necessary to affect such petition;
5. That this affidavit has been executed to induce the City of Cleanvater,Florida to consider and act on the above described property;
6. That site visits to the property are necessary by City representatives in order to process this application and the owner authorizes City
representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application;
7. That(I/we),the undersigned authority,�iereby certify that the foregoing is true and correct.
�f e",�"/''✓.r��.''L''�,v.";,�
Peter lPti�ic�iY O�ssistant Secretary Property Owner
Property Owner Property Owner
STATE OF FLORIDA,
COUNTY OF PINELLAS
✓
Before me the undersigned,an officer duly commissioned by the laws of the State of Florida,on this � day of
JkA)i�� ��� personally appeared -��_�—����_ who having been first duiy swom
Deposes and says that he/s{�fully understands the contents of the affdavit that hel�e signed.
;�OT.-'1:'.'r PUBI.IGS;ATr.OFFLCRIB� �
David ;�I. Falk �`���--Y� ��/�`
:�z' :Cocimissiva,.4'llD766417
v 7
'��.=Expires: APR.28,2012 Notary Public Signature
Notary Seal/Siamp �����D��RU ATL.4DiTTC BO\7)ING CO.,�c. —
My Commission Expires: �-�.�/}(J/��
—�—„-'c
C:\Documents and Settings\derek.fergusonlDesktop\planning dept forms 07081Comprehensive Infiil Project(FLD)2008 07-11.doc
Page 8 of 8
�
� �, "
LL Planning Department CASE NUMBER:
° learwater 100 South Myrtle Avenue RECEIVED BY(Staff Initials):
� Cj Clearwater, Florida 33756
�
� Telephone: 727-562-4567 DATE RECEIVED:
Fax:727-562-4865
� SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION
� SUBMIT 14 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION-Plans and
application are required to be collated,stapled and foided into sets
* NOTE:A TOTAL OF 75 SETS OF THIS APPLICATION AND ALL SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION IS REQUIRED TO BE SUBMITTED IN
CONJUNCTION WITH A COMPLETE LEVEL ONE OR LEVEL TWO APPLICATION.
COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM
(Revised 04/24/2007)
�PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT�
APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A)
APPLICANTNAME: CIRCLE K STORES, INC
MAILING ADDRESS: 12 911 N. TELECOM PARKWAY TAMPA FLORIDA 3 3 6 3 7
PHONE NUMBER: (813) 91 O-6 8 8 5 FAX NUMBER: (813) 91 O-6 912
CELL NUMBER: EMAIL:
PROPERTYOWNER(S): CIRCLE K STORES, INC C/O REAL ESTATE PROPERTY MANAGER
List ALL owners on the deed
AGENT NAME: BRAULIO GRAJALES, P.E. / HIGH POINT ENGINEERING
MAILING ADDRESS: 5 3 O O W. CYPRESS STREET SUITE 2 82 TAMPA FLORIDA 3 3 6 0 7
PHONENUMBER: (813) 644-8333 FAXNUMBER: �813) 644-7000
CE��NunneeR: EM,ai�: BGRAJALES@HPE-FL.COM
1. ARCHITECTURAL THEME:
a. The landscaping in a Comprehensive Landscape Program shall be designed as a part of the architectural theme of the principal buildings
proposed or developed on the parcel proposed for the development.
NfA
OR
b. The design, character, location and/or materials of the landscape treatment proposed in the Comprehensive Landscape Program shall be
demonstrabiy more attractive than landscaping otherwise permitted on the parcel proposed for development under the minimum landscape
standards.
SEE ATTACHED
C:IDocuments and Settingslderek.fergusonlDesktoplplanningforms 07071Comp2hensive Landscape Program 04-24-07.doc
Page 1 of 2
�
2. COMMUNITY CHARACTER:
The landscape treatment proposed in the Comprehensive Landscape Program will enhance the community character of the City of Clearwater.
SEE_ATTACHED
3. PROPERTY VALUES:
The landscape treatment proposed in the Comprehensive Landscape Program will have a beneficial impact on the value of the property in the
immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development.
SEE ATTACHED
4. SPECIAL AREA OR SCENIC CORRIDOR PLAN:
The landscape treatment proposed in the Comprehensive Landscape Program is consistent with any special area or scenic corridor plan which
the City of Clearwater has prepared and adopted for the area in which the parce�proposed for development is located.
SEE ATTACHED
THE LANDSCAPING REQUIREMENTS OF ARTICLE 3, DIVISION 12 MAY BE WAIVED OR MODIFIED AS A PART OF A LEVEL ONE OR LEVEL
11/VO APPLICATION, AS THE CASE MAY BE, IF THE APPLICATION FOR DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL INCLUDES A COMPREHENSIVE
LANDSCAPE PROGRAM, WHICH SATISFIES THE ABOVE CRITERIA. THE USE OF LANDSCAPE PLANS, SECTIONS / ELEVATIONS,
RENDERINGS AND PERSPECTIVES MAY BE NECESSARY TO SUPPLEMENT THE INFORMATION PROVIDED ON THIS WORKSHEET.
SIGNATURE:
i,the undersigned,acknowiedge that ali representations made in STATE OF FLORIDA,COUNTY OF PINEL�
this application are true and accurate to the best of my Sworn to and subscribed before me this�•=� day of
knowledge and authorize City representatives to visit and A.D.20/�� to me andlor by
photograph the property described in this application. ��y�_{ L i'('h ,wh�i§Q@rsonallv�u,U�has
produced
as identification.
�
.�.,��.-..�:_.�=�. �� � — — --
Sign re of pro erty owne����ia1S�C��,tQ� o a public,
�eter i�hlich y My commission expires:i/_jj�, ���-
_�
. _'C_:1.1.,"-S'•_'rll_ 'FLi'�-�'.:
.�� .:,
�Jd:vc(� ;+�. t`n�4:
` �,_L^�r�m:s,�{^ .s�llD7n6417
" �� •;_xE;irPs: A�R.28,2012
L'.O�J�i?D TfIRU ATL.4YITC BONDI'`iIG CO.,IflC.
C:IDocuments and Settingslderek.fergusoniDesktoplplanningforms_07071Comprehensive Landscape Program 04-24-07.doc
Page 2 of 2