The URL can be used to link to this page

FLD2011-12046; 524 MANDALAY AVE; CORK-N-BREW BISTRO & MONEYLINK . � 524 MANDALAY AVE Date Received: 12/29/2011 4:00:20 PM Cork-n-Brew Bistro & Moneylink ZONING DISTRICT: Tourist LAND USE: Resort Facilities High (30 du/acre) ATLAS PAGE: 258A PLANNER OF RECORD: ESC PLANNER: Ellen Crandall, Planner II CDB Meeting Date: March 20, 2012 Case Number: ELD2011-12046 Agenda Item: E. 3. Owner/Applicant: TEMA Investments Representative: Mahshid Arasteh.PE, Address: 516—524 Mandalav Avenue CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT GENERAL INFORMATION: REQUEST: Flexible Development approval to permit 1,378 square feet of nightclub with an accessory outdoor cafe and 2,607 square feet of office in the Tourist (T) District with a lot area of 8,700 square feet, a lot width of 87 feet along Mandalay Avenue and 100 feet along Ambler Street, a front (east) setback of zero feet (to building), a front (south) setback of 2.87 feet(to building) and zero feet (to pavement), a side (west) setback of zero feet (to pavement) and 46.7 feet (to building), a side (north) setback of 0.78 feet (to building) and zero feet (to pavement), a building height of 13.4 feet (to flat roo�, and 6 parking spaces as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project under the provisions of Community Development Code Section 2-803.C. ZONING DISTRICT: Tourist(T) FUTURE LAND USE PLAN CATEGORY: Resort Facilities High (RFH) BEACH BY DESIGN CHARACTER DISTRICT: Destination Resort District PROPERTY USE: Current: Vacant, Office 3,800 square feet of floor area with un- striped parking spaces. Proposed: 1,378 square feet of nightclub and 2,607 square feet of office with seven parking spaces (including one handicapped space). EXISTING North: Tourist (T)District SURROITNDING Overnight Accommodations (La Sal Motel) ZONING AND USES: South: Tourist (T)District Overnight Accommodations (Sand Pearl) East: Tourist(T)District Attached dwellings (Belle Harbor Condo) West: Tourist (T) District Overnight Accommodations (Tropic Isle Mote� Community Development Board—March 20,2012 FLD2011-1204f�Page 1 of 8 ANALYSIS: Site Location and Existing Conditions: The 0.19 acres is located on the west side of Mandalay Avenue approximately 150 feet south of Rockaway Street and the existing building is comprised of three tenant spaces. It is also within the Destination Resort District of Beach by Design. The site, until recently, has been vacant. The tenant space to the south, 516, is currently occupied with an office; however they do not have a Business T�Receipt. The surrounding neighborhood is a tourist area comprised of hotels/motels, retail sales establishments and restaurants. The Sand Pearl is located across Ambler Street from the subject property. There are adjacent hotels and motels to the north, south, and west. There are restaurants to the northwest of the property as well as office, restaurant, and nightclub uses along Mandalay Avenue between the roundabout and Rockaway Street. City parking lot #36 is less than 300 feet to the north of the subject parcel. Development Proposal: The proposal is to permit a nightclub specializing in craft beer and wine with a sidewalk cafe at this location through conversion of the existing 1,378 square foot northernmost tenant space, (524 Mandalay), and to request the use of office for the remaining 2,607 square feet in the two remaining tenant spaces. The proposal includes front, side and rear setback reductions to recognize the location of the existing building and parking at less than the required setbacks. There presently does not exist any foundation landscaping along Mandalay Avenue or Ambler Street. The application includes the reduction from five to zero feet of the required foundation landscape area along both fronts of the building, which is not possible to install due to the existing building's location at a zero front setback. The proposal improves the architectural style from the existing tile fa�ade to a tropical architecture, which is appropriate and aesthetically pleasing for this beachfront property and complements the tropical vernacular envisioned in Beach by Design. The building fa�ade will be improved through the removal of tiles to expose stone work which will be refinished. Stucco will be applied below the windows of the 524 Mandalay tenant space. The stucco and the fa�ade overhang will be repainted and an awning installed over the nightclub tenant space. The proposal meets the tropical vernacular architecture guidelines through the use of large expanses of windows, covered and uncovered outdoor seating, overhangs providing patrons protection from the sun, awnings providing the windows screening from the sun and finish treatments commonly found in tropical vernacular architecture such as stucco and stone . Due to the location of the existing building and the size and configuration of the subject property, this site has not previously been provided with adequate on-site parking. The proposal includes a reduction to the required parking for a nightclub and office from 24 spaces (based on 10 spaces per 1,000 square feet, and 4 spaces per 1,000 square feet) to seven spaces. The applicant has submitted a Parking Demand Study that analyzed the available parking within 1,000 feet of the subject property, north of the roundabout. The nightclub is proposed to operate from 4:00 pm to the latest of 3:00 am, typical of many beach establishments. The office uses will operate from 9 am to 5 pm. The proposal will utilize a new dumpster located in the rear parking lot. Community Development Board—March 20,2012 FLD2011-12046—Page 2 of 8 The development proposal's compliance with the various development standards of the Community Development Code (CDC) is discussed below. Floor Area Ratio (FARI: Pursuant to the Countywide Plan Rules and CDC Section 2-801.1, the maximum floor area ratio for properties with a Future Land Use designation of Resort Facilities High (RFH) is 1.0. The proposed one-story building footprint produces a floor area ratio of 0.45, which is consistent with Code provisions. Impervious Surface Ratio (ISR): Pursuant to the Countywide Plan Rules and CDC Section 2- 801.1, the maximum allowable I.S.R. for properties with a Future Land Use designation of RFH is 0.95. The existing ISR is 0.99 and, after construction of the proposed improvements, the ISR will be 0.96, which while still nonconforming, will at least reduce the existing nonconformity. Minimum Lot Area and Width: Pursuant to CDC Table 2-803, there is no minimum lot area or width requirement for Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Projects. The subject property has a lot area 8,700 square feet and lot width along Mandalay Avenue of 87 feet. Minimum Setbacks: Pursuant to CDC Table 2-803, there is no minimum setback requirement for Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Projects. The development proposal includes a front(east) setback of zero feet (to building and sidewalk), a front (south) setback of zero feet (to building and sidewalk), a side (north) setback of 0.78 feet(to building), and a side (west) setback of 0 feet (to parking) and 46.7 feet (to building). All of these setbacks are to existing improvements that cannot be altered without substantial ramifications to the functionality of the property. As such, and as the building placement is typical of other buildings in the area, staff supports the requested setback flexibility. M�imum Buildin�Hei� Pursuant to CDC Table 2-803, there is no maximum allowable height for Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Projects. The proposed building is 13.4 feet (to top of flat roo fl. Minimum Off-Street Parkin�: Pursuant to CDC Table 2-803, the minimum off-street parking requirements for Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Projects shall be as determined by the Community Development Coordinator based on the specific use andlor ITE Manual standards. As stated previously, due to the location of the proposed building and the size and configuration of the subject property, only limited parking is available. The proposal includes a reduction to the required parking for nightclub from 13.78 spaces (based on 10 spaces per 1,000 square feet), and office from 10.4 spaces (based on 4 spaces per 1,000 square feet) for a total of 24 required parking spaces to seven spaces. Of these spaces, one will be dedicated for handicapped use. The applicant submitted a Parking Demand Study that analyzed the available parking within 1,000 feet of the subject property. The study concluded in accordance with a methodology established with the City of Clearwater staff that there are a tota1220 available parking spaces within 1,000 feet including City lot #36. Therefore, the study concludes and staff supports the finding that adequate parking is available within reasonable walking distance of the project. Mechanical Equipment: Pursuant to CDC Section 3-903.H.1, mechanical equipment shall be screened from any public right-of-way and adjacent properties. The screening of inechanical equipment will be addressed at time of permitting. Community Development Board—March 20,2012 FLD2011-12046—Page 3 of 8 Sight Visibili Trian�l, es: Pursuant to CDC Section 3-904.A, to minimize hazards at street or driveway intersections, no structures or landscaping may be installed which will obstruct views at a level between 30 inches above grade and eight feet above grade within 20-foot sight visibility triangles. The proposal has been reviewed by the City's Traffic Engineering Department and been found to be acceptable. Utilities: Pursuant to CDC Section 3-912, for development that does not involve a subdivision, all utilities, including individual distribution lines, must be installed underground unless such undergrounding is not practicable. The electric and communication lines are to remain as-is. If located exterior to the building, to ensure views are minimized, this electrical equipment should be painted the same color as the building. The location and potential views of such electrical equipment will be addressed at the building permit stage. Landscapin�: Pursuant to CDC Section 3-1202.D, there are no perimeter buffers required in the T District; and pursuant to Section 3-1202.E, as the proposed vehicular use area is less than 4,000 square feet, no interior landscaping is required. Foundation plantings are not requested as the footprint of the proposed building matches the existing along Mandalay Avenue maintaining a cohesive development pattern along the property line not allowing appropriate area for foundation plantings. Solid Waste: The proposal will utilize one roll out dumpster for trash removal. The dumpster will be located to the rear (west) of the building with the enclosure walls painted to match the building and gates meeting City of Clearwater specifications. On trash days, the duxnpster will be rolled out by Solid Waste Department's trash pick-up. The proposal has been found to be acceptable by the City's Solid Waste Department. Signage: No freestanding or attached signage is proposed at this time. Due to site constraints freestanding signage is not possible; however any freestanding signage in the T District is restricted to a maximum height of four feet, or six feet through a Comprehensive Sign Program. Any proposed attached signage not meeting minimum Code requirements must be approved through a Comprehensive Sign Program. Additional Beach by Design Guidelines: Section C.1 requires buildings with a footprint of greater than 5,000 square feet to be constructed so that no more than two of the three building dimensions in the vertical or horizontal planes are equal in length. As the proposed building footprint is approximately 3,988 square feet this requirement does not need to be met. Section C.2 requires no plane or elevation to continue uninterrupted for greater than 100 feet without an offset of more than five feet. As all facades of the building are less than 100 feet in length, this requirement does not need to be met. Section C.3 requires at least 60 percent of any elevation to be covered with windows or architectural decoration. The elevations along Mandalay Avenue and Ambler Street contain windows, stone columns, and overhangs along the entire building elevations. On the north and west elevations, where the visibility of the elevations is limited or hindered, less architectural decoration is practical and provided. Community Development Board—March 20,2012 FLD2011-12046—Page 4 of 8 Section C.4 requires that no more than 60 percent of the theoretical maximum building envelope located above 45 feet be occupied by a building. As the maa�imum height of the development proposal is 13.4 feet to flat roof,this guideline is not applicable. Code Enforcement Analysis: There is a current office use operating without a business tax receipt, however as this use is requested through this FLD Code enforcement will not be initiated until the completion of this case. There are no outstanding Code Enforcement issues associated with the subject property. COMPLIANCE WITH STANDARDS AND CRITERIA: The following table depicts the consistency of the development proposal with the standards as per CDC Section 2-801.1 and Tables 2-802 and 2-803: Standard Proposed Consistent Inconsistent Floor Area Ratio I.0 3,985 square feet(0.45) X Impervious Surface Ratio 0.95 0.96 Xl Minimum Lot Area N/A 8,700 sq.ft. X Minimum Lot Width N/A 87 feet X Minimum Setbacks Front: N/A East: Zero feet(to building) X Zero feet(to sidewalk) South: 2.87 feet(to building) X Zero feet(to sidewalk) Side: N/A North: 0.78 feet(to building) X Zero feet(to pavement) West: Zero feet(to parking) X 46.7 feet(to building) Maximum Height N/A 13.4 feet(to flat roofl X Minimum Off-Street Parking N/A 7 parking spaces Xl X'See analysis in Staff Report Community Development Board—March 20,2012 FLD2011-12046—Page 5 of 8 COMPLIANCE WITH FLEXIBILITY CRITERIA: The following table depicts the consistency of the development proposal with the Flexibility criteria as per CDC Section 2-803.0 (Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project): Consistent Inconsistent 1. The development or redevelopment is otherwise impractical without deviations firom X the use and/or development standards set forth in this zoning district. 2. The development or redevelopment will be consistent with the goals and policies of X the Comprehensive Plan, as well as with the general purpose, intent and basic pianning objectives of this Code, and with the intent and purpose of this zoning district. 3. The development or redevelopment will not impede the normal and orderly X development and improvement of surrounding properties. 4. Adjoining properties will not suffer substantial detriment as a result of the proposed X development. 5. The proposed use shall otherwise be permitted by the underlying future land use X category, be compatible with adjacent land uses, will not substantially alter the essential use characteristics of the neighborhood; and shall demonstrate compliance with one or more of the following objectives: a. The proposed use is permitted in this zoning district as a minimum standard, flexible standard or flexible development use; b. The proposed use would be a significant economic contributor to the City's economic base by diversifying the local economy or by creating jobs; c. The development proposal accommodates the expansion or redevelopment of an existing economic contributor; d. The proposed use provides for the provision of affordable housing; e. The proposed use provides for development or redevelopment in an area that is characterized by other similar development and where a land use plan amendment and rezoning would result in a spot land use or zoning designation;or a. The proposed use provides for the development of a new and/or preservation of a working waterfront use. 6. Flexibility with regard to use, lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street X parking are justified based on demonstrated compliance with all of the following design objectives: a. The proposed development will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of the surrounding properties for uses permitted in this zoning district; b. The proposed development complies with applicable design guidelines adopted by the City; c. The design, scale and intensity of the proposed development supports the established or emerging character of an area; d. In order to form a cohesive, visually interesting and attractive appearance, the proposed development incorporates a substantial number of the following design elements: ❑ Changes in horizontal building planes; ❑ Use of architectural details such as columns, cornices, stringcourses, pilasters,porticos,balconies,railings,awnings,etc.; ❑ Vaziety in materials,colors and textures; 0 Distinctive fenestration patterns; ❑ Building step backs;and ❑ Distinctive roofs forms. e. The proposed development provides for appropriate buffers, enhanced landscape desi n and a ro riate distances between buildin s. Community Development Board—March 20,2012 FLD20 1 1-1 2046—Page 6 of 8 COMPLIANCE WITH GENERAL STANDARDS FOR LEVEL TWO APPROVALS: The following table depicts the consistency of the development proposal with the General Standards for Level Two Approvals as per CDC Section 3-914.A: Consistent Inconsistent i. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, X coverage,density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage development and use of X adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons X residing or working in the neighborhood. 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. X 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the X immediate vicinity. 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including X visual,acoustic and olfacto and hours of o eration im acts on ad�acent ro erties. SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION: T'he Development Review Committee (DRC) reviewed the application and supporting materials at its meeting of February 2, 2012, and deemed the development proposal to be legally sufficient to move forward to the Community Development Board (CDB),based upon the following: Finding s of Fact. The Planning and Development Department, having reviewed all evidence submitted by the applicant and requirements of the Community Development Code, finds that there is substantial competent evidence to support the following findings of fact: 1. That the 0.19-acre subject property is located on the west side of Mandalay Avenue approximately 150 south of Rockaway Street; 2. That the subject property is located in the Tourist (T) District and the Resort Facilities High (RFH) future land use plan category; 3. That the subject property is located within the Destination Resort District of Beach by Design and is subject to all applicable requirements set forth therein; 4. That the tenant spaces were previously vacant and has been developed with office use; 5. That the proposal includes the conversion of 1,378 square feet of floor area for nightclub use, 2,607 square feet far office floor area, and redevelopment of the rear parking lot to accommodate seven parking spaces; 6. That the proposal includes a front (south along Mandalay Avenue) setback of zero feet (to building and sidewalk), a front (south along Ambler Street) setback of zero feet (to building and sidewalk), a side (north) setback of 0.78 feet (to building), and side (west) setback of zero feet(to parking) and 46.7 feet(to building); 7. That the proposal includes large expanses of windows, covered and uncovered outdoor seating, overhangs, awnings, and finish treatments such as stucco and stone; and 8. That there is no active Code Enforcement case for the subject property. Conclusions of Law. The Planning and Development Department, having made the above findings of fact,reaches the following conclusions of law: l. That the development proposal is consistent with the Standards as per Community Development Code Tables 2-801.1, and 2-803; Community Development Board—March 20,2012 FLD2011-12046—Page 7 of 8 2. That the development proposal is consistent with the Flexibility criteria as per Community Development Code Section 2-803.C; 3. That the development proposal is consistent with the General Standards for Level Two Approvals as per Community Development Code Section 3-914.A; and 4. That the development proposal is consistent with the applicable Design Guidelines of Beach by Design. Based upon the above, the Planning Department recommends APPROVAL of the Flexible Development application to permit 1,378 square feet of nightclub with an accessory outdoor cafe and 2,607 square feet of office in the Tourist (T) District with a lot area of 8,700 square feet, a lot width of 87 feet along Mandalay Avenue and 100 feet along Ambler Street, a front (east) setback of zero feet (to building), a front (south) setback of 2.87 feet (to building) and zero feet (to pavement), a side (west) setback of zero feet (to pavement) and 46.7 feet (to building), a side (north) setback of 0.78 feet (to building) and zero feet (to pavement), a building height of 13.4 feet (to flat roofl, and 6 parking spaces as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project under the provisions of Community Development Code Section 2-803.C. with the following conditions: Conditions of Approval: 1. That a building permit be obtained for the parking lot, building fa�ade, and interior improvements. 2. That the parking lot, building fa�ade, and landscaping improvements be completed prior to issuance of a Business Tax Receipt; 3. That a Business Tax Receipt be obtained for the nightclub, and office establishments; 4. That an Outside Seating permit be obtained for the seating in the public right-of-way; 5. That the final design and color of the restaurant building be consistent with the elevations approved by the CDB; 6. That any new or existing mechanical equipment be screened from public rights-of-way and adjacent properties; 7. That the dumpster enclosure be constructed and painted to match the building; and 8. That the electrical equipment located on the outside of the building be painted the same color as the building; and 9. That this use (nightclub) be limited to this tenant space only, and that any desired relocation within this shopping center or enlargement of floor area shall require a new application for re-review by the CDB; 10. That on-premise consumption of alcoholic beverages be limited to beer and wine(2-COP); 11. That there shall be no amplified music or microphone usage outside; and. 12. That prior to the issuance of any building permits, the Fire Department may require the provision of a Water Study performed by a Fire Protection Engineer in order to ensure that an adequate water supply is available and to determine if any upgrades are required by the developer due to the impact of the project. The water supply must be able to support the needs of any required fire sprinkler, standpipe and/or fire pump. If a fire pump is required, then the water supply must be able to supply 150% of its rated capacity. Pre ared b Plannin and Develo ment De artment Staff: � � y � r r Ellen Crandall, Planner II ATTACHMENTS:Location Map;Aerial Map;Zoning Map;Existing Surrounding Uses Map;and Photographs Community Development Board—March 20,2012 FLD2011-1204C�Page 8 of 8 Ellen Crandall 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater,FL 33756 727-562-4836 ellen.crandall(�a,mvclearwater.com PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE ■ Planner II City of Cleanvater, Clearwater, Florida May 2010 to Present Duties include performing the technical review and preparation of staff reports for various land development applications, the organization of data and its display in order to track information and provide status reports. ■ Planner I Ciry of Clearwater, Clearwater, Florida December 2009 to May 2010 Assist public customers at the Zoning Counter. Review Building Permits, Sign Permits, Business Tax Receipts, and Landscape Plans as well as Comprehensive Sign Program Applications, and Flexible Standard Developments. Regulate growth and development of the City in accordance with land resource ordinances and regulations related to community development. Interdepartmental and zoning assistance. Respond as a City representative to citizens, City officials, and businesses concerning ordinances and regulations. Make recommendations and presentations at staff level at various review committees,boards, and meetings. ■ Community Planner Bradford County, Towanda, Pennsylvania January 2008 to May 2009 Coordinates with the 51 municipalities in Bradford County and assisted them in writing Comprehensive Plans, developing ordinances, and general public and municipal education on zoning, land use, and ordinances. I developed a comprehensive Zoning Lexicon that included zoning maps, districts and definitions for all municipalities with zoning ordinances. Assisted in the County Parks Plan and in developing a comprehensive Park's book listing all the parks in Bradford County. I assisted mapping the natural gas wells as well as printing maps and parcel data for the gas companies. ■ Intern Pennsylvania Geologic Survey, Middletown, Pennsylvania May 2006 to September 2006 Scanned geologic maps,updated documents and assisted in general office tasks. EDUCATION Bachelor of Science, -Major: Geography, -Minor: Art, -Certificate: Geo�raphic Information S s��tem SHIPPENSBURG IINIVERSITY, Shippensburg,Pennsylvania ISA, International Society of Arboriculture, Certified Arborist LEED Green Associate - - 4 7 8 9 N 9 5 Z � _ L � _� � _ �_ 04 - - L - - - - -' 15 � 14 �3 12 11 �80 � � 3 5 802 �–�� 6 , , � R staura� I � N � M eo, a - a L ,o � o � - � � � � ,z � � , = z m $ � 54�9Z � BAY ESPLANA E �� 531 + ' m r _ � �n� �6362 _1 �4 4.26 A c�c> � Q Public Parking 532 Q c,s� .� C Q 521 � 0 40 � N � g � � - -� " i � .. ��'ng ss �57924 R sta�rant 3 �c na odatio s o I " Attached �� 8 ' S �- -� Dwellings � LWDOI.IRRTS � (r� 5 � 86035 ' a � pHASEI iw Ove 'gh '°° Acc oda ions « � 501 1 s3p�S PHASEII f— � L78657 � 500 �O��Si � � $BAYMONT ST s � sl g0 —� '�*'� ' a V � NYfbbNm � � �58 r 495 � � 60 4� 1 � 43 9 49 d83 r-- — � s� z ? _ � 2_ 18135 ��qj __ 62 � � – 3 3 49 Existing Conditions Map Owner: TEMA Investments Case: FLD201 1-1 2046 Site: 524 Mandalay Property Size: 0.198 ACRES PIN: 05-29-15-57924-000-0070 Atlas Page: 258A HEILWOOD � BAY , ¢ � AVALON � � N s ; � � � z KENDALL �uanita Z � Z C � 0 � a �' m BAY ESPLANADE Rocwa Y PROJECT SITE Ambler BAYMONT ST Q � � ¢ S'4N MARCO W � O 2 � PAPAYA ST �- g ►-- � � Q w � z° z � a Pier sp O Causeway Blvd Location Map Owner: TEMA investments Case: FLD201 1-1 2046 Site: 524 Mandalay Property Size: 0.198 ACRES PIN: 05-29-15-57924-000-0070 Atlas Page: 258A 604 580 602 T 8 � o <o N '��i 601 � " y Q � c z i I �' p � OS/R � 534 � Q 532 QQ osrR � 52, P p N R ^ � � N 530 52 52 N 52 HDR �, 53p�S �a 500 499 � v "�v v °i u�"u3 a'�iv^i u°'i�o`� � 495 490 489 483 492 487 490 Zoning Map Owner: TEMA Investments Case: FLD201 1-1 2046 Site: 524 Mandalay Property Size: 0.198 ACRES PIN: 05-29-15-57924-000-0070 Atlas Page: 258A r r w� � �. o-�-: �, � � �, � � ?� � �w .�� c�� f � � + � , '.�' ��, 1� � v � , . . . , � � M. �a . � d�.� �.�.._�! � , �. � '�, _ � . � ' r ' '�t ,��9 .p •[ ' O � 2 wF . �� . �' 1 �°� +� Ai, ,� ..„. ...! �� ; . 4, ,� � ';,� 1 _ i ''• ��=��'t'�0'4 � � . , . ...� �^ � � .�. ,.�.,#. ;.,,�,r7��1 i �� N�Y,. ,s�. r. •� �� ...ylF"`.d��`wdl�"t�Mw'tt�°'1V',py;�.��vs'� � ��a�w�" " +4� � /�� .� k Atf,# 1 S�? .i j � ��`s��-'" } �ti� ^ .'*\,�t Rt. �J $ .. � �� 'tt� � � �� u�y '� ^�? �� J . . -� � cey . � � . �� ry al{� ti J • s,�, -J�, �'S� � � � � * l �� u Q�. � : a� �;�e. ^ � �� :. �7. �- � c �� i1�� • �� , ` ' � F r � .r � �� ,. � � ^_ y� ' i� � ;., a I �� ,. • i : �, o m a• ' � � �`� � � � i �4 _ i �. � },i , : . ', • �� ,� ;� _ �.dM �•�.iq� �� . �, >,, e s ` ;�,. .y'��t�l:mr- i ..� `.� � � � _ �� . '� �.. �,... .. 1. � :4 • � � �� '� �;�'�� ',� � r"h-.'�'., i` " `�`��+ � k�,: , ,�i` i �' } #. �� }��' � � r� `� ° I.� ,`� � <9` � ?'�, ,�� '�� t . i!� � �r . {. .. . /n — ,.,�� . �(' .� Yd R$.�'B� 4"��', . ,� ,y `�� ' �� :..��t'dt�A¢f�2�•r: � � f�dPN�`ii�j#1!�'11�-s � � � �$� • .. ; ., ,� .* . � . ; �1' 'i�,,l��-��', �� • , �t.�: � � 3 a� � . �, R j ; �� _ ..• � r C , � A" , r �� ( n M1.. y y � .. ti .. ':i . ' I'.;....,. .. Y �. � s� � � t • �, f. � �.. � ,�'.' �ii� y��y 1� f d4'� • ;�' 1- � �y� u a--�.^r-�. .,t uur� �. .i/�p :.�j �n+C" �' ' � t�y�� t n,MAt•�. ,p M:. . � wp � �IM A I Aerial Map Owner: TEMA Investments Case: FLD2011-12046 Site: 524 Mandalay Property Size: 0.198 ACRES PIN: 05-29-15-57924-000-0070 Atlas Page: 258A ,I . i __ _ � i� � � � r ^—�. . �_ ,„ � �;,•.,�_ •I' � . „�.. , :.: ��-. � �� < �� ,�. ;�,. '� t'� , ,; . . . «� _ — ._ ' ` � ��. -, � � 4 . � �,�, ��; _►�. ��,� �,'tl ��` 'si , ��,� - _ "".. � `- � �v`�_ , i � d x s # ( - + r :.�. _��.' '+ � � r y I� } ;S' , 'M�.h��7�� II', � J / ,t �' �� .�... _ ..�. .. �:.. '�",a�� _,'.�»�ar:... ��` �'�i.,. � � View of existing parking on the west property line. View of the West side of building �� i .o �� : / � .�I� /� �.. �`��/ „�� r� ��n! O ,�ce rr n�!"! . ,� , � �; � �s �,• iMr* ° � _ - . �,�. p _ �. C �� .�� a �_ � _ �- _ _ �,��, �, , �ti�. : �� . �N~ R� �� _� �a _ _.__ �ra - . , , ""' NSf�R R�� , t�jt, ' � ' � ' .. . �� , �� '��, � � - � �� _ ��,5 �;�,�t.*: i ..��c= } �,�k, ��_ +`' View of the south side of the building. East side of the building,facing Mandalay. �. r _., . , � , �� . - r�.��. ,�_�. � 1 ,�. � ��.: � � � � �r . � 1 � . ___. ..�� '�"°'� � �� ,1`-- .z,, , ,., , . —_""'` , �s , :�r�. . - 5 d4 .. 5$�� 3`k � ,r . � � . .. . .. � y�{z. k!� � j:..� MB �t: .°ri' I �. . :,. , �� t' ut< � i� �� I x� � � � � . .,.,. � . „�. �°.,;'..�,. . .� .r�r,� � •J'. - '_'� . . ��,�., View of the buildin from the corner of Mandala View of the proposed nightclub tenant space(to g Y the right)and the proposed oftice(to the left). and access alley. East side of building,facing Mandalay 524 Mandalay Case Number FLD2011-12046 Page 1 of 1 , Planning�Development CASE#: LL Department RECEIVED BY(staff initials): ° � ��r�vater Cl�earwater,�Flo da 33756 DATE RECEIVED: Telephone:727�62�567 � Fax:727-562-4565 D SUBMIT ORIGINAI SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION ❑ SUBMIT 14 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION-Plans and application are required to be coliated,stapled,and folded into sets ❑ SUBMIT FIRE PREI.iMARY S(TE PLAN:5200.00 ❑ SUBMITAPPUCATION FEE$1,405 inGudes above �aoo.00 * NOTE:15 TOTAL SETS OF INFORMATION REQUIRED (APPUCATIONS PLUS SITE PLAN SETS) FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project (Revised 10.27.2011) �PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT� A. APPLICANT,PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4202.Aj APPUCANT NAME: jaC(lUBIlIIe EaSI1 8L M1C�1�1 G�aSSO MAILING ADDRESS: 112 DeVOII DI1Ve,Clearwater,Fl. 33767 PHONE NUMBER: 72']-2�-0 j]4 FAX NUMBER: 727-2 j d-j Q.�}1 CELL NUMBER 727-766-0110� E�� Michael@Moneylinkmortgage.com PROPERTY OWNER(S): TEMA IIIVES�1118riLS list ALL owners on the deed �e2ll1S COUyLitc1S AGENT NAAAE: Ari1eIlCa.t1 QLl�lly COTLSllItclritS, LLC Mahshid Arasteh,PE,Principal MAILING ADDRESS: ZOO Ve N, Suite 200, Safety Hazbor,F134695 PHONE NUMBER: 7Z7-72S-ZSSO FAX NUMBER: ']27-"]25-2317 CELL NUMBER: 727-543-14SH E�� a1118I1C1T!(il1aI1�C011S111�C111tS �111111.COII1 B. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4202.A) PROJECT NAME: COriC-ri-BT'eW BIStCO 8L MOri0y11II1C PROJECT VALUATION: $nOt finaliZed Mo age ^ srFtEEr,a��RESS _524 Mandalay Ave and 522 Mandalay Ave Clearwater, Fl. 33707 _ PARCEL NUMBER(S): OS-29-1 S-S7924-�0�-0�70 PARCEL SIZE(acres): � PARCEL SIZE(square feet): $7OO S $� � t.EC�a�o�scRiPr�orv: Miller's replat Lot 7 PROPOSEO usE�s>: Beer and wine consumPtion light a�petizers and a Mortgage Office �� _ �ESCRiPTioN oF REQUesr: � Fle�ble Development approval to permit a nightclub and office use in the Specifica�y iden6�y the request Tourist('l�District within an existing building with a lot size of 8,700 s .ft, �nGude number of units or square lot dimensions of 87x100 ft.,buildin hei t of 13.4 ft.,a front east set back footage of non-resideMial use and all g � � � ,_ requested code deviations;e.9. 4.7 ft., south and west set backs of 2.97,46.77 ft and 9 parking spaces as a C:WsersWahid�DoaimeMslscott application filfed 2 (9).dax . Page 1 of 8 � DOES THIS APPLICATION INVOLVE THE TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS (TDR), A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED PLANNED UNI DEVELOPMENT,OR A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED(CERTIFIED)SITE PLAN? YES_ NO_x_ (if yes,attach a copy of the applicabie documents) C. PROOF OF OWNERSHIP: (Code Section 4202.A.5) ❑ SUBMIT A COPY OF THE TITLE INSURANCE POLICY, DEED TO THE PROPERTY OR SIGN AFFIDAVIT ATTESTING OWNERSHIP (see page 7)Attached D. WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 3-913.A) O Provide complete responses to the si�c(6)GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA—Explain how each criteria is achieved,in detail: 1. The proposed development of the land will be in haRnony with the scale,bulk,coverage,density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. Thepro�osed project will occu_py an existing strudure.Other structures of same bulk and covera ec,�curre�exist on adjacent properties. 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. The proposed development is an interior use change to a nightclub and an office use,both of _ which exist in the immediate vicin' _so it will not have any impad on the development of adjacent pro rties or buildin s�? __ _____ 3. The proposed development will not adversely affed the health or safery of persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use. The proposed use of a nightGub and office use is consistent with deve�ment in the vicin' which currently dces not affect the health and safety of persons residing or working in the neighborhood. 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. Per the attached parking demand study,many of our patrons will be foot traffic due to the tourist nature of the location.Also the Mortgage office has only 2employees and generates very few trips. 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. There are other nightclubs and offices in the immediate vicinity. 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, inGuding visual, acoustic and olfadory and hours of operation impads,on adjacent properties. The proposed project minimizes adverse effects on the adjacent properties since the business will operate within normal hours for like businesses in the area C:\UsersWahid�DocumeMs�scott application filled_2_(9)_docx Page 2 of 8 , WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project Criteria) ❑ 1. The development or redevelopment is otherwise impractical without deviations from the use andlor development standards set forth in this zoning district. Unless this building was demolished and land assembled it would be impractical without deviation s to the development standards. There will be no changes to the parking lot and the building.This is an existing property with existing set badcs. 2. The development or redevelopment will be consistent with the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan, as well as with the general purpose,intent and basic planning objectives of this Code,and with the intent and purpose of this zoning distrid Pursuant to the Comprehensive Plan objective A.6.6 requires the City to support the maintenance and enhancement of the Tourist Economic base.This use will promote that objedive.,the proposed project is consistent with the goals and policies of the comprehensive Plan. 3. The development or redevelopment will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of surrounding properties. This is an existing building.The proposed uses are compatible with adjacent uses and will not impede the nortnal and orderly development and improvement of surrounding properties. 4. Adjoining properties will not suffer substantial detriment as a result of the proposed development. Business in adjoining properties should improve as this curcently is a vacant,underutilized property. 5. The proposed use shall othervvise be permitted by the underlying future land use category, be compatible with adjacent land uses, will not substantially aker the essential use characteristics of the neighbofiood; and shall demonstrate compliance with one or more of the following objectives: a. The proposed use is permitted in this zoning district as a minimum standard,flexible standard or flexible developmeM use; b. The proposed use would be a significant economic contributor to the City's economic base by diversifying the local economy or by creating jobs, c. The development proposal accommodates the expansion or redevelopment of an existing economic contributor, d. The proposed use provides for the provision of affordable housing; e. The proposed use provides for development or redevelopment in an area that is characterized by other similar development and where a land use plan amendment and rezoning would result in a spot land use or zoning designation;or f. The proposed use provides for the development of a new and/or preservation of a working waterfront use. The proposed uses are peRnmed in this zoning district and will be an economic contributor because it creates jobs 6. Flexibility with regard to use,lot width,required setbacks,height and off-street parking are justified based on demonstrated compliance with all of the following design objedives: a. The proposed development will not impede the normal and orde�ly development and improvement of the surrounding properties for uses permitted in this zoning district; b. The proposed development c�mplies with applicable design guidelines adopted by the City; c. The design,scale and intensity of the proposed development supports the established or emerging charader of an area; d. In order to form a cohesive,visually interesting and attractive appearance,the proposed development incorporates a substantial number of the following design elements: ❑ Changes in horizontal building planes; ❑ Use of architedural details such as columns,comices,stringcourses,pilasters,porticos,balconies,railings,awnings,etc.; O Variety in materials,colors and textures; ❑ Distinctive fenestration pattems; ❑ Building stepbacks;and ❑ Distindive roofs forms. e. The proposed development provides for appropriate buffers,enhanc�ed landscape design and appropriate distances between buildings. The scale and intensity of this development supports the established character. C:\UsersWahid�Documerrtslscott application filled_2_(9).docac Page 3 of 8 E. STORMWATER PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteria Manual and 4202.A.21) ❑ A STORMWATER NARRATIVE MUST BE SUBMITTED WITH ALL APPLICATIONS.All applications that involve addition or modification of impervious surFace, inGuding buildings, must include a stormwater plan that demonstrates compliance with the City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteria manual.A redudion in�impervious surface area does not qualify as an exemption to this requirement. ❑ If a plan is not required,the narrative shall provide an explanation as to why the site is exempt. ❑ At a minimum,the STORMWATER PLAN shalt inGude the following; ❑ Existing topography extending 50 feet beyond all property lines; ❑ Proposed grading including finished floor elevations of all structures; ❑ All adjacent streets and municipal storm systems; ❑ Proposed stormwater detention/retention area including top of bank,tce of slope and outlet control structure; ❑ A naRative describing the proposed stormwater control plan including all ca�ulations and data necessary to demonstrate compliance with the City manual. ❑ Proposed stormwater detention/retention area including top of bank,tce of slope and outlet control strudure; ❑ Signature and seal of Florida Registered Professional Engineer on all plans and calculations. ❑ COPY OF PERMIT INQUIRY LETTER OR SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT (SWFWMD) PERMIT SUBMITTAL(SWFINMD approval is required prior to issuance of City Building Permit),if applicable ❑ ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF STORMWATER PLAN REQUIREMENTS(Applicant must initial one of tl�e following): Stormwater plan as noted above is included � Stormwater plan is not required and explanation narrative is attached. At a minimum, a grading plan and finished floor elevations shall be provided. CAUTION — IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A STORMWATER PLAN AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED,APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements,contact the City Public WoAcs Administration Engineering Department at(727)562-4750. F. SUPPLEMENTAL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 4-202.A) X SIGNED AND SEALED SURVEY(including legal description of property)—One original and 14 copies; N/A TREE SURVEY (including existing trees on site and within 25' of the adjacent site, by species, size (DBH 4"or greater), and location, including drip lines and indicating trees to be removed)—please design around the existing trees; N/A TREE INVENTORY; prepared by a"certified arborisY', of all trees 4° DBH or greater, reflecting size, canopy(drip lines)and condition of such trees; X LOCATION MAP OF THE PROPERTY; X PARKING DEMAND STUDY in conjunction with a request to make deviations to the parking standards(ie. Reduce number of spaces). Prior to the submittal of this application,the methodology of such study shall be approved by the Community Development Coordinator and shall be in acxordance with accepted traffic engineering principles. The findings of the study will be used in determining whether or not deviations to the parking standards are approved; N/A GRADING PIAN,as applicable; N/A PRELIMINARY PLAT,as required(Note: Building permits will not be issued until evidence of recording a final plat is provided); N/A COPY OF RECORDED PLAT,as applicable; WA C:1UsersUNahid�Documents�scott application_filled_2_(9).docx Page 4 of 8 G. SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A) O SITE PLAN with the following info►mation(not to exoeed 24"x 36'�: � Index sheet referenang individuai sheets inGuded in padcage; MA North arrow; MA Engineering bar scale(min�num scale one inch equals 50 feet),and date prepared; MA All d"ur�nsions; MA � Footprint and size of all EXISTING buildings and strudures; NA ^ Footprint and size of all PROPOSED buildings and structures; NA � AII required setbadcs; MA All existing and proposed paints of access; MA " All required sight triangles; � Identification of environmerrtally unque areas, such as watercourses, wetlands, tree masses, and specimen tree.a, includir�g � description and location of understory,ground oover vegetation and w�ldlife habitats,etc;Location of all public and private easements; MA Locafion of all street rights-of-way within and adjaceM to the site; � � Location of e�risting public and private utiliGes,induding fire hydraMs,storm and sanitary seMrer lines,manholes and lift stations,gas and water lines; MA All partcing spaces,driveways,loading areas and vehicular use areas; NA ` Depidion by shadi�g or crosshatching of all required parking lot interior landscaped areas; � v Location of all solid waste coMainers,recyding or trash hand6ng areas and outside mechanical equipmer�t and all required screening � {per Sedion 3-201(D)(i)and Index#701}; MA Location of all landscape material; NA Location of all onsite and offsite storm-water management facilibes; MA location of all outdoor lighting fixtures; AAA Location of all exis6ng and proposed sidewalks;and � � Floor plan typical of buildings for all Level Two approvals. A floor plan of each floor is required for any parking garage requiring a _ Level Two approval. ❑ SITE DATA TABLE for e�asting,required,and proposed development,in written/tabular form: EXISTING REQUIRED PROPOSED MA Land area in square feeh and acres; 8,700 sq.ft. 5000/10,000 8,700 sq.ft. MA Number of IXISTING dwelling units; N/A � N/A N/A MA Number of PROPOSED dwelling units; WA �� WA WA � 1,378 sq.ft.& 1,378 sq.R& MA Gross floor area devoted to each use; N/A -�— ?��--- — 2�'ft' - � Partcing spaces: total number, preseMed in tabular fortn with the 9 See parking � __ number of required spaces; __ study � � Total paved area. induding all paved parking spaces�driveMrays, 3.734 ft. 43% WA 3,734 sq.ft. _�_ e�ressed in square feet 8�percentage of the paved vehicular ariea: � .43% � Official records book and page numbers of all ebsting utility P��26,page 17 N/A Plat 26, easemen� pa9e 17 MA ' Building and structure heights; 13.4 ft Max 35-50 ft 13.4 v MA ! Impermeable surface ratio(I.S.R.);and 0.99 � .95 0_96 MA Floor area ratio(FA.R.)for all nonresidential uses. WA 1.0 M/A � ❑ REDUCED COLOR SITE PLAN to scale(8'r4 X 11); ❑ FOR DEVELOPMENTS OVER ONE ACRE,provide the following addfional iMortnation on site plan: One-foot�ntours or spot elevations on site; ' Offsite elevations if required to evaluate the proposed stom�rvwater management for the pare:el; � All open space areas; � Location of all earth or water retaining walls and earth berms; Lot lines and building lines(dimensioned); Streets and drives(dimensioned); � Building and structural setbadcs(dimensioned); Strudural ovefiangs; C:1UsersWahidlDocurr�errtslscolt applic:a6on filled 2 (9).docac - Page 5 of 8 H. LANDSCAPING PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-1102.A) NA LANDSCAPE PLAN with the following information(not to exceed 24"x 36°): All existing and proposed strudures; Names of abutting streets; Drainage and retention areas including swales,side slopes and bottom elevations; Delineation and dimensions of all required perimeter landscape buffers; Sight visibiliry triangles; Delineation and dimensions of all parking areas including landscaping islands and curbing; Existing trees on-site and immediately adjacent to the site,by species,size and locations,including driplines(as indicated on required tree survey); Location, size, and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, indicated by a key relating to the plant schedule; Plant schedule with a key(symbol or label)indicating the size,description,specifications,quantities,and spacing requirements of all existing and proposed landscape materials,including botanical and common names; Typical planting details for trees, palms, shrubs and ground cover plants including instructions,soil mixes, badcfilling,mulching and protedive measures; � Interior landscaping areas hatched and/or shaded and labeled and interior landscape coverage, e�ressing in both square feet and percentage covered; Conditions of a previous development approval(e.g.conditions imposed by the Community Development Board); Irrigation notes. ❑ REDUCED COLOR LANDSCAPE PLAN to scale(8'/Z X 11); O COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM application, as applicable. Landscape associated with the Comprehensive Landscape Program shall exceed minimum Code requirements to offset the areas where minimum Code will not be met. I. BUILDING ELEVATION PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4202.A.23) ❑ BUILDING ELEVATION DRAWINGS—with the following information: All sides of all buildings � Dimensioned Colors(provide one full sized set of colored elevations) Materials REDUCED BUILDING ELEVATIONS—same as above to scale on 8'h X 11 x Per coordination with City Planning Deparlment only Photograph s of the existing elevations are r�equired(see attached) Also see attached drawings for the remodeled east and north elevations that accommodates outside seating J. SIGNAGE: (Division 19.SIGNS/Section 3-1806) All EXISTING freestanding and attached signs; Provide photographs and dimensions (area, height, etc.), indicate whether they will be removed or to remain. Currently there are no signs on the property O All PROPOSED freestanding and attached signs; Provide details inGuding location, size, height, colors, materials and drawing; freestanding signs shall indude the street address(numerals) ❑ Comprehensive Sign Program application,as applicable(separate application and fee required). ❑ Reduced signage proposal(8'h X 11) (color),ff submitting Comprehensive Sign Program application. C:\UsersWahidlDocumeMs�scott application filled_2_(9).doac Page 6 of 8 K. TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY: (Section 4-202.A.13 and 4-801.C} ❑ Include if required by the Traffic Operations Manager or his/her designee or if the proposed development: ■ Will degrade the acceptable level of service for any roadway as adopted in the Comprehensive Plan. ■ Will generate 100 or more new vehicle directional trips per hour andlor 1000 or more new vehicle trips per day. ■ Will affect a nearby roadway segment and/or intersection with five(5)reportable accidents within the prior twelve(72)month period or that is on the City's annual list of most hazardous intersections. Trip generation shall be based on the most recent edition of the Institute of Transportation EngineePs(ITE)Trip General Manual. The Traffic Impact Study must be prepared in accordance with a "Scoping Meeting" held with the Traffic Operations Manager and the Planning DepartmenYs Development Review Manager or their designee(727-562-4750) Refer to Section 4-801 C of the Community Development Code for exceptions to this requirement. O Acknowledgement of traffic impact study requirements(Applicant must initial one of the following): Traffic Impad Study is included.The study must include a summary table of pre-and post-development levels of seNice for all _ .___. roadway legs and each turning movement at atl intersections identfied in the Scoping Meeting. � _� _ Traffic Impact Study is not required. CAUTION — IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at(727)562- 4750. L. FIRE FLOW CALCULATIONS!WATER STUDY: Provide Fire Flow Calculations.Water Study by a FIRE PROTECTION ENGINEER to assure an adequate water supply is available and to determine if any upgrades are required by the developer due to the impact of this project. The water supply must be able to support the needs of any required fire sprinkler,standpipe and/or fire pump. If a fire pump is required the water supply must be able to supply 150°k of 8s rated capacity. Compliance with the 2004 Florida Fire Prevention Code to include NFPA 13,MFPA 14,NFPA 20,NFPA 291,and MFPA 1142(Annex H)is required. ❑ Acknowledgement of fire flow catculations/water study requirements(Applicant must initial one of the following): .__.____..__ _... Fire Flow CalculationslWater Study is included. �� Fire Flow CalculationslWater Study is not required. JFK CAUTION — IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A FIRE FLOW CALCULATIONS/ WATER STUDY AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE � RESUBMITTED AND SICNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements,contact the City Fire Prevention Department at(727)562-4334. M. SIGNATURE: I,the undersigned,acknowledge that all representations made STATE OF FLORIDA,COUNTY OF PINELl.AS in this application are true and accurate to the best of my Swom to and sub�cribed before me this/'r"` day of knowledge and authorize City representatives to visit and _ �T r- l ,A.D.20 �-,�.� to me and/or by � photograph the property described in this application. /�',•_i> ` z-<',� y�<' ,who is personally known ha �--�` produced ' _..` as identifi . �^�, t� ; (�A �'" '�_~ � • -�y . ,_. �f', , � _ �','_ � , _ _ %�`1_ . '� _ _ � .. ,�°,,--' ._.-�--'°_ -------�-.._._ otary public, -�',�-�' �i�' _ __. � � _ representative ' ./ ? My comm_,,is�sjorrexpires�.__,_�_�....�'�,,.�....m.�_ _...,.. ti.._,��-- °� .�`"+'�"� VARUNA EPASINGHE ��.N: a,�, ;*; ,_ M1Y COMMISSION#EE 20419 C:\UsersWahidlDocumentsl�tt application filled_2_(9).d X;;.o;•;:�`~' �RES:August24,20tq Page 7 of 8 ••,,..,• Bonded By Naaak,d Notary Aean, _ . . Pl. AF�IDA1/tTTO AUTHQRtZE AGENT: �. Provide names of atl pmp�ty akne�s on deed—PRNd'['ivll oame� J�� .�ILid�J I��JV l5 __�-1�.�. . 2, ThaE p arsslwe are)the n+�mer�s)and reeerd t�le twWar{s}of the toDawir�des�nbed propeity(addmss or gerterai ionlion): �j� - � E� C�.� -�eft�;�?,�,1��t�.X'�et� ��x-� �=C- 3. Tbat this propeAy e�nstltut�the property fcr whbch a requed fior a:{dearn'tre rec��ast} ' 4 That the uridetsTgned(has�we}a�polMed acid(does/do}appoint �tC��t� G:�(�;�G ��`t/�-1�S l+ti�J f�-►�"�S i C!� __`Tf�C�C�l��il� f�S� • _,_ . as{hTsrtnar)egonqs)io ezea,le amr P�or ou,er aoctrr�ents�ry to a�nct su�n pet�nrr, 5. Thet Yhis afltdavR i�s!�n e�cea8ed to induce the Qq of Clse�water,Florlda to eor�and act rn�the abova descr�d ProPerhi: fi. T1�tsNe vists In lhe ptopetty are n�rY bY CIIY o�thres in order to proce�tbis a�n and tl�e owner autlwrizes C�y reprasenlaWes lo�fs&a�xl phatagrapli tha PruAeihi�fi thts ep�tcaUon� 7. That(Uwe).the unders(B�'�y�Y..�Y�Y�t the fore9o�g is true and amed. . p� Pro�iy Ouvnar � '� � . �Y� . STA'I�OF�LORIDA, t�UNTY OF PlNELLAS 8etore ma)he iuidwsig�ed�an oA�az'dutY�by t�I��t i�e Stete of Florida,a�it�is �-�P �h day of �:e . � �.ti. ..' �_ii p�or,�a� A.�?��fs o9�?'r��G��Y�i�,��dw„�, o�e p��w��.r�y,�a�a�tn�oo�e:otn;��a. �1- At��C �:�-�:ot-7a•:�i�.:�: � y� ,��.� . CA40.0f CASAli411A - . � � �� , • �; : �b.�� 8: _ Y No�vqpublic5tg�iure . � Con�ela►:0 OD 718�56 �� . �tY s��P� ' ', „t� 8o11ded'iMoi9NNala�alNa�r. ';^ - S:Wiannin9 Depatbr�ilWp�aatlon FortrislDevdnpm�t Revf�ZDYQ5.�10.tioot et�with naw Deparbneni namelCanprehens[ve lnbp PioJed(Fl.d) Paps 8 0l 8 � SECTION 5,TOWNSHIP 29,RANGE 15 �J �� PARCEL#05-29-15-57924000-0070 J J 3tl€6I3 � Q n.i oov�s�r ]N a c�.i avu srrE wne �H� 61 �� "� BAY ESPLANADE m Z� u.i urrosGVesTrauN a , `��,� =' ��! y dc�,.,. o = ❑ �� ROCKAWAY Q'N � W Z Iti:.� �� bl �O . Q U � r �� ; BAYMONT ST tACpTi0t�1 �� Q . Q Q SAN M,�� W '�'� � 2 N � PAPAYA ST Y W )- Q N � � f� o � W � V� m � n0 Z W � O 60 O CousewaY 81vd V AERIAL LOCATION MAP � � g � SITE DATA TABLE �^� tot�,r�nrs aiut.�ro nc a lI�TII1G 1Rava5ED REQu1R� 1MP pt MT DEIEOF ISCGWFD N MT eoaK b,wa n,a nc weuc a�aams � a nEU.�v awtx aaw zorma: m�,�arm �m �arm �, a HIXO Z1AE: � p C XIItIRE lAlD IlSE: OHiD817f01Y�T 0611N11ICIVMF57RT OKf11N710N1�T 114 IBDL C65CI�D fIdOPER11/PPEIJK f� -.� 10EM�0EIE(g� 111 M g .� usrLlE: aB6Mt oFfit� � WA µ�GYICE NM AE fIAY YM GF ;N �•a, IATMFA: 470051.1.19AO� 0.AOSF.I.1911Oi� S�OOD/10,000 17bJC 0107 EFFECR1f 3D1fl�R� `-� �� . - 10D1 � " IOTMIm7N: p/EET e7FlFT — �..i ,� lUbDQqOCV8iI6E: D,Wf Sf. 3,9155.F. — ''.,��...^,�{� ►;! (s�.a x ora�ss srtel +sx asx � j, w�t. (abS5RO0RMRA: 516-1761 5F. _ y� .�5 . ,+' ��A.) 7�905F. SR-Ofl4�:M65F. . r t �W.ii _; � i SM�M(#fIGUB:LDfi S.f. a.,."`� . . .. r. . .�u: a . �DFl7. Pd1�Etl[ � PE`6i'SfC - P - . ' wan+:o.�r nortnc n noam:oar auan�:a m�rr:c�wx ecw aP vROV. " � � , f *�.` H76DW0SE7lIQ6: Sd71X:LT SMN:C SOVifi:LT SIXIiN:tl 5�:0' d � �� esr:a �sr:s�.0 rwsr:o� �sr:s�.�r wx:m� ,, - �' -" �-; -� w6r:�a.r wFSr:o� war.�c.r war:i.�o� �".,� , _ s �` l +er-, B�NDCIO IHfiIT: 1]A' U.I IM%3550 fT. ` 4 ' p .. � �xp~� _ . A� VB¢MNt UHE ARPA 3,7345F.!�7.97. 7,SOV SF.I�% — �*� �+ .�y" ' DMERVWUSGMIN�RA7W: 0.�74.f./.99 0.�24F./.% .% F ,`•'� � JD llrt��. OfH/5PKl: 63P.1 A1 70lS.F.1.7� � . �.*ur . PMI@16LOTWI9i10Rt/�l09CAPE: W� WR WA . SHE�:�.. iAqI�IR 01�diPffT:6 MK77ffff:7 1W4000(iFA . . smffr:s smffr:s sff vuuar�snuv C1 ■ 1 . �� r� �� f"J J J I Cr�IOG°�4G�1 ��,� � � 0' 20' 40' Z Q� F-� i I 3CALE: 1" = 20' Q GRAPHIC 9CAI.E QN FEE7) U� "q X,� i811�1 TBIA�2 X I I �f� fND.IikD LB+8707 fliD.Ndll tB�6707 y x W Z � EIfV.-4.5T N.A.V.U.86 EIEV.= 3.99'N.AV.D.88 0 .�'�, p �� av � LOT 5 LOT 6 " I _ � \ flC SIORY G&S �:, �, .. M �I � '� na x mr . I ' X�i nt t . SB9'S9'S1'�: : . '. .88'NC. . � . . . M1o' - - r• , �� . .� i � Z .,.,. g � a .. �� I� ; � a ..�� I � � : �` r��v �`� .."�:: ,��... o ;� � � � � "'+ °�x �� 5 � (i �.� :� W ��" � .... e�� Z; � � LOT 8�� '--�-=-?x .�� a.�� ."��.�:,h � ¢� � � ♦ � �xlw��+*►R �....�516,542 d 524 MNID�AUY AVEAUE �:' :. I ¢I � q� � . f1EARN'A70t BEACH.R 33767 .: � ��i�i�t� ' "� LQT � \ n,�rs� \ �..,' r p' � L E G E N D � � 1 I Z orrwrirvArr�i ��\`\\ �� ,QI 48 � � wr �� .� w+ �, �� \\��.., . .. � �. �-WAIERIEIER rr n�aw�cu w.crs � 4 ��\ __ •-UtMltt Pq.E �:.. ..��\ ��,�.� Z�� I —-E%ISTMlG SiptNWA7FR ti� x , \\\\\\\\\\\ gf �e.. I w��re. � _ —-E%S71NG SAW7ARY SENER tNE �� fy —•—-Ef�57N1C WA1ER LNIE �v �� , pr �� x .._,--EkS71NC NECLAIMED WAIER lN1E . ��♦ t§S '_ � �� . .�� -E7�S71NG CAS tk� � na wo x�' � COK'�.. I ` I -OVE�M U7NJtt NNiE(5) °rTM iCYfN �� .� X�':�'.�. � D4-WAtERVAIVE MESi 80'R r r WEST � '� � I �`�' �-STORM MANHOLE a g S�'58'31'W 6Q08'M e°"s�%� � 5895215tiM �� 00�00'M �4•• ,,,_..J_I.L— 1••—«•�-�+— �-i�tE HYDRNlT x x.,_._r.—ris w�"tlp�' � � 1rNAM � AR WE y II ' E—-CUY uN710R � y: �`�.. t► �a A�uIBL�R STREET o-Put�c uehtt 2711W1-Of-MC A�IML �� x,�� I �-ROAD�1171 y y f �}. J L 76 �► ( 0 • • , —•—"— 9-CABIF PEOESTAL � �_. �x , . w . .�y.. -�—�.t. � -WOOD iFNCE • �,,�r. 4 m mc aw I� I o-E%iEAWR llpiT ' � ";�� 9� y�k 1W�STqtY GB.S �� ' ��i .; � ��', � � I �� aEARNUhxY BE9Etr w�AwMcA'H-o2' �`�' •`, �� - ?"o�y I I I Ix El£V.a 52147 N.AYA88 -- }�, . '_ _ I i 4 ,� ��5dx, �x�r .C:•` f � �. {� r tti i�, z' -� .. ' .+' -� .F-..��:':� . _ �� Y� ' ;�e�< :� .`�'� � � � � f-' � _ ' �'` ;.s�. •n„�` _ ;�-'�� .��Z ��~ ,; �.� ��`� C2. 1 !6 r� �� 1—J J J _ssrr:.::ss�assei..• Q � � jy � �� ,ia� + "` ,� �I O Z 8 . °i •7k9C�96H9lStSffiCSCCI:N- � *� � �, Q� `�t• � • c : �.�'�' '��. �°' `� a J� � s;y�ay.�.�...� � U s�ram:s:ac�rruc.�`�.�ti,,, ��s��e� _„ � `�' � '�r�.�iCi?x�'s6F � W Z � . � � �;��:�� ,�_. °�� a� �_ � �- � -��.�z.�__ -�— �� . � �� _ _ •��----• "��:w •�.�-�r��::._ '�- ��A�r� �� .,,.�...,.,�....,�a......,.��,,.w ,� rnw asmr s amrr�rrw o ou��wa IftC�MIfOAMIw M�A�OMYRa11Oq11/� ,w 1J-� � � � � A B C D E F �y�.� z � � "" .� � .... '" � � � vv�m— � � ��~ � � �� `rt A HM�D NI�L p ru rwqa tia niw�u rr n�+r.� • iINL�1 W R ME w OO�dG p��t! w� Uo,a f��a0 C FNL 10 CA �I�rraq�nr a�o�us NOIE: �a we�as 0. I�L�M w�a ma�ef aeeo a Yoc w w+�+a�.w'r w w�.wMt qwaw�r L AA IOIIM � �E�ut Ts!�on�.fia rruu�o f. UL O�IL ��M A�[tl-1 dRQ lM�n ww.ec�qm sr fO�'° � �—��e� Od s ns�w �w.arv s uxiw�u nioLen �Y �� y�µp�pp p�� MWLKNMOYO'WIIC. TYPICAL SINGLE HANDICAPPED STALL �.�� s,�� arcmxnim�v� anmxo.�nivi ..�mr rr.a rra G �—•� � < ► m�e-�wv 'o'.�rs°ne�:n�1Y1 � - ' • •[t�aM�s Ya .1��pT� �� ' M•`,. "I Y� ';� �x.v� t -:�7�.` �F � `�yA 1�Y•. �'�ry�y,r ` � yj � � , I L �� ,� � . i � _M i i 4 : �� •�� ' �� ' i"'ti.M.... � ��y,l� -. ' �I a _... .��y�,rl..� ..,wtiu y�u.Y ' `� ��• � � 6�• � a�l I—� � ' �::.p'�"" �} _` !• ;•� � G` "'"�.�^. � �'_ _ r i-�wrr. TYPICAL MANDICAPPED — ,, �z � --� � �"' SIGN DETAIL _ t• ,„A. m�nci m i a.am r�.ru wu rw�araa�a � y� � �f� l�r��r ,r �� an�edx;a�s� _ � :C 1 ^' � ('"^�"` '� f"r"" �: �� ' — , : r �r— � w..�.� � r _ r ;;w�....�.. � . i it � � xoo L .�it�n�it' rrr.ti`°�i�;ien:v �<. � . r. � � y � L�G�IP{ARIIImY�, =_� ... 1 I ��IBM NOL WIlO K HIIIM ELNL QEYA�I� � . � .\ � �Nr �i. :. ��.t. ,,,,�� 1�—taN'�� P�. L�i-i/+' P�.°'� �sa�r�• i iJ'! �� Z"�5�•-�n�'. �`d "�� .'""...'P1+�`.Y10"""°tl1 WMPSTER ENCLOSURE SINd.E ` �.'' NON—TRAFFlC BEARING �� ""•� . � arr�ou n ur i a i mr�ao x�n :i v a . �� . ILTS TA C3 . 1 ' �s r� �� J � J J I [►�OG34(n] �vi� v� I 0' 20� 40' Q� '�, i I �� Z�� ,. 3CALE: 1" = 20' a J� I �� CRAPHIC 3CALE(IN WEET) U� �I 1BM�1 TBI,I/2 � �N � FND.N8D tB�8707 FND.N#U LB�6707 W Z ELEY.=4.5T N.AV.D.86 ELEV.= 3.99'N.A.V.D.88 :�a,, �O ° � QU � a LOT 5 LOT 6 ' iI ( � � �o�G� ' � Z � ti � � ,� �.x�: -- � g �, ��s,�. � �.� !� _ �. ;. �:........... , � � µ� ,� „ G , ........... � : cn c.as � rrrR� �� • ,oeu � i ( � W 8 \\�'��'�'�°�� 5 ' LANDSCAPE LEGEND z a � �� QQ �e � �� i w (J g�-y .� �� \\\�\��\\�� ,�� I � PA-PASPALUM NOiATdJ�ARCEN1R1E'-BAFIIA CRASS(SOD) � N LOT 8 � p'-�-�--}�C ' � �: � �i � �-unrov�►uscue•c►rxun caooess'-ueaa�-i c�u.-i�•o.c. p ! ��.�� ',�� I Q, ov-seeu uwat-nwu�auu�no ` � qE STORY C.&S � Q I � �{eiw�rns9 �516,522 IE 524 YANDAUY AVENIIE �, ,� � ¢� i � ' � CIEARYM7ER BEACH�R 3J767 � .� � --i, �7 '� � wt � (}.,, LOT 7 wa,�.n....�.r,. � .° , r o• � L E G E N D � i . \\\\ . M � F \\\\\\\ I Q I � \\\\\\�� i� :eov: � p-YMIERNEIpt a � � \�� .. � ;,. i �I •-UlYl1YPol£ 1 �� ♦�� tsy�.� ———-E%IS1NG STdWWAIER 11NE - �� °�0�� ♦ At,�� s�on. R --—---E1tlS11NG SMNTARY SEMER UNE ' ��♦ �� .".� � :..\ \\\\\��♦ � wu�n. =w --E10S1NICWAhRIIlE I --E%ISiNC RECUIMED WATER LINE �� . � ��\ . �� . :� � —c�s--E%ISiNCGASIINE ' : �,�v .. � ♦��\\ ♦ tW � � I I -OVFRlIEAD U1Wtt MptE(5) � � �� Nt 4.� � . :; . �. `. �. . ,�.� ��.� i I �- TORM YYANhIq.E WEST 60'R �� q��_�__�_ �y � <� � 58938'}2'W BO.ai71 u°�w.9 w 58952't�''M tOd� _/-I� �RS—c1s— �-FAIE HYDRANT � � GAS�GAS--GAS -- ��)I : �'d1Y ANCHOR � —`�s AI�ER S�EET �.,� ,, °-v""`wc u�'°t � � — _ m'aart-ac-�r.��wwn a�o�"W�� '� W I—"' e-G��F P��STU � q �, �y/ � I -�� .��. o-�ua�, � � ,wo sro�r c.as � I 7 PRIIIARY BENCHMfARK ro� � � �II I a�we�eaa+wunc�-oz' i I 1 ( ELEV.=5.214Y N.AV.D.88 � � I � � � i "� 2—%v—%Z ��.�..o. �SHEET� L1 . 1 �,__ -�'=--- —=— j�;'�,,,.� ` _�ALE� 1° = 2� \�� '' u--- � — — �-?, � ' ^ 1 r�'� � \ � � � s � �• � ��.� �� , 522 '� � .I �,:_ __. '_ ..��. _ _ _.� .� _�- �� .�� '� s�^�� _ _ `'; _ �,.. �.�._ ,. _._ _ , „., T�L � -- -- _ __ _ , ; \ � ,�. =Z`TZ�� i � � ,� �� i � , i �� — L � /( i � I� I - � �`� � � i _1-, i � �� _ \ �'� � � ":r F� � z�� -`r`r� ,' �� , �� `�_ _ -,-� ,-� , 1 � .. � � I; ' \ r � li _ �_t � ''�< �`s ; i �9� ��'_"�, ' ; _ ', - ' ', I � _ _. _ ' , �, I' '� �:� :�" .,_ , 1 `r �! �, ,��,�, � � ` Y � ,: �'� > � , �� ' � ' ,� � � � 4 A � _� � � : � _ � : � , , , � � .�.. �r �. � ` �� - - , I � � , � � _--�� _, .Rr�.�. � � � � � � - - , - _ .. �,, , ��__ : -- � ;i �. , ; � � 7 �� _ ' � � �� 'r-___1 �1___--. _ � ',, � �� I � \'�. �� ., --—_____-- ----.- ------ -___- -------- --—"�------ —------ __. _ ___ _ . _ _ va.F.vAFFL`F'Ofc�. PPOJE��7�lAME- SHEET Jacqueline Eash&Michael Galasso Cork-N-Brew Bistro A M E R I C A N Q U A L I T Y CONSULTANTS, LLC aouNr-cs: sHeEr Nawe: wwrv rai cw ea,vr a�r 522&524 Mandalay Avenue ■ Clearwater,Florida 33707 F R O N T C O L O R R E N D E R I N G ��,�^b, nmmaaa� � awv� �w�ort w�.�n � � �� w � < � N � . � +� .�.F`�,, ''�-4�` �$�^�:.�. �� $. w��-: �„ . � ..,_ ' -._,a- .i�^<`.._... .,.ax l I L i `� �� I �� I r _[ il"` II�p . � L ' .i�I� i � � _ i i ._: _T� 1 �_,_ � — �� , �,.5,'_S r Li�. I ,�T."T 1� L i i , ��,1-,1 1,�'Tl T�� __�.'t � �;� 1�_i �� j�I� Z�I3 J i 1_i n � � i_ S_L.._:.��1 _C�._, , k� :� f �� L �, I,, `�� .��5 I L.. .. _.,." 1� �l. lf T <<r. � � �.—t r _ iT T.i: Ir— - j . 1ZL r, �I � � -L 1 � 6' FROM FACE �JF CURB-- —� i � �� , T�� 'i��' � ! � I„_ ° L � y��'r'+�� , 3 'j ' ,1 �� ! � � _ -- ------- _ . � ,----- � , 10' Ff.�'M -PC- GF��IR43 FftEVAFE��CR�. PP.O]EL:NAME: SHEET Jacqueline Eash&Michael Galasso Cork-N-Brew Bistro A M E R I C A N Q U A L I T Y CONSULTANTS, LLC aooaess: sNeE-mar�e auurr xro r.w aar.Nrww 522&;24 Mandalay Avenue A� ■ Cleanti-ater,Florida 33707 N O R T H C O L O R R E N D E R I N G ��„�„ raem-r��a� � aiavw iwx�crt � � - - — --_ . ._ _ . . _. � <V II i..i J Q(,� N REMOVE TiLE, RESTORE SNCCO FINISH 522\\ 524\ \\ \ NEW GLASS PANE � \ \ REMOVE TILE, t RESTORE (3)COLUMNS BACK TO ORIGINAL BRICK FACADE BAR TOP O 42' I \ \ I . . . . NEW STUCCO FINISH REMOVE 71LE. RESTORE STUCCO FINISH REMOVE TILE, RESTORE STUCCO FINISH VREPARED PoR: PROJECT NRME: SHEET )acqueNne Eash&Michael Galasso Cork-N-Brew eistro A M E R I C A N Q U A L I T Y CONSULTANTS, LLC ADDR65: SHEETNAME: 01Mf/7f 1W GW G1GM7411 A1 522&524MandalayAvenue pROPOSED FRONT ELEVATION i � dearwater,Florida 33707 �� : � � � CV II �:.i J Q G..J N NEW BLACK AWNINC `Ml}i CREAM LETTERING ON FACE NEW GLASS PANE \ HINGED CLOSURE ON BOTH SIDES (NORTH dc WEST) REMOVE 71LE, RESTORE(3)COLUMNS BACK BAR TOP O 42' TO ORIGINAL BRICK FACADE NEW SlUCCO � � � FINISH � � � , REMOVE T�LE, RESTORE STUCCO FINISH PREDMED FOR: PROIBLT W1ME: SHEET 7acqueline Eash&Michael Galasso Cork-N-Brew Bistro A M E R I C A N Q U A L I T Y CONSULTANTS, LLC ADDRBS: SNEEf NAME: a4YIIY x.V GW GuNT av 522&524MandalayAvenue pROPOSED NORTH ELEVATION 1�� qearwater,FloNda 33707 , �� "m n«w .wm rw�ean � __ _ _ _ FND. N&D LB 6707 FND. N&D LB 6707 �-� !�� ELEV. = 4.57' N A.V.D.88 ELEV. = 3.99' N A.V.D.88 JJ Q • b ��„a � �Z� - � LOT 6 Za� 5 aJ� U� � �N I 50 R W Z � I �o � I QU � TWO STORY C.B.S. I I . L--------------- .. EAST -------100'R--------- � S89'59'51"E 99.88'MC I — — — — — — � �`°` ° i ------, • o ,o� , �32�.- o 0 � � o 0000o I- � 3•_8 0000000000 38' I � _ �^-'� �LN�EPL.BIS�4—�"""'�'`�L � � I � -,.��------ � I >- I I M�� O O O O ❑ I � I � J � � .�e W � � CORK—N—BREM'OFFiLE/ I �) � � �_ 5�� I � N 2/8 S.F. �^ �� z J � � � w � i � > N rwo � � Q v � � STORY � I � � rn I �- 3 � 3 �.B.s. � i LOT 7 � � i Q � � � � i Q = i ONE STORY C.B.S. � � i 516 MANDALAY AVENUE cov. � � S i CLEARWATER BEACH, FL 33767 � � I � � � � �o � � W I � <M !-�' Z � 3 3 �,`$c o � � f �LL O W I � N � � ` O � � � I � �� ------Zm 00 I � t�� . I � � gp'R WEST 100'R � C� � 60.06'M S89'52'15"W 100.00'M Cov. � � � AMBLER STREET � SHEET 20' RIGHT-OF-WAY: (ASPHALT) I A�■ J � 1 s � � � �U ��' SEATING COUNT SO�R JJ a " �E � INSIDE: 31 SEATS °'Z� � OUTSIDE: 18 SEATS , Z a� TWO STORY C.B.S. �� TOTAL: 49 SEATS �� WZ ��o -------- ------------- 100'R ------------------ __ a� � �1 "E 99.88'MC � - - — — — � COOLER O � O io z --j 32' � — � � � 6 0 � O � O O O O � � p O O O O O O O O O O 3g" � � � 3'-6�� WALL T LL __CORK-N=BREW BISTRO __BE REMOV�o°�__ --_ � -_I;378-Sf.------------ O 00 00 00 O � � KITCHEN � � � � � I CORK-N-BREW OFFICE/ 36" STORAGE � � FRIDGE � 246 S.F. 36" � � � � � =o � � a M�p � �C � U � �� I � � � �� LO � � � � � ' SHEET ONE STORY C.B.S. A2.2 �� ,�� .r,, ,�� 4� ^��, � `�� `y �" , � ti � ,;; t�,. �� _� � �s��,�, ,� �� :� " �� } �� R � � �� 1A �� . � �.�� NS . SU - _ - -�W� � p - ...5 ..�=y�'xf .�.... . ,Z'^",,,,_ ��,�?,T r t,,,� ^� " � .. �, ,' ��,�":%�+� .��.�w�-- y�'" I :- �� . . _ . ��*«.. .. v,F:.. . � . � L..',�, .,�..:. . ., . . . '� , . �� `� ��. �' r'— �� § � _.�..,',"""°'{`_ `� , E , ., ; „+.�.,., .. �° .;r.. ' .� -.__.._--...�. F � _ ��'' °rz. _ . �� =,'-^,c-s. .-. - ,g � � , ^] � � " .KA w. �„ .. �,` : r-._.�._ .�� ' at "� •.M = �� ' h � � ry ._, ' . ,�� ,� '� , �, .. � G•,_.. _ . ;�„� , __ „y� } �. ;"'' j---,.... 1 ' �'— ��; �k� � .. - �, � � ��, *Uii` �� - _",—,.•.,. NVI�� .. r=_.t - 1 _l� .""�^,-,. '��-., ,,.�:� !� . ��II Ii1M�: 1'�vo'�`",t:- Proposed Exterior Color Palate "Cork-n-Brew Bistro" 524 Mandala Av y enue, Clearwater Beach Overhang 7547 7474 7482 7489 �:�� Knee wall & Lintel Brick to be restored to natural finish ,...-r 'R "�?!7 ! � _ - �'�-��i 4�.fa ' � , Parking Demand Study � For Cork N Brew Bistro And Moneytink Mortgage 522 and 524 Mandalay Ave Ciearwater, Florida Prepared bv AMERICAN QUALITY CONSULTANTS, LLC 200 9�'Avenue North Suite 200 Safety Harbor,FI 34695 Date:Febn�ary 9,2012 l � �' �� D ,� �� ` � � � �� _. � '' ^n r,��.a;:�`y ��) �CES OEPT � Ii��W:.. ,Y��..IVi S�.`l�. � C1T� CF C�E�i°tVUATER_� � PARKING DEMAND STUDY OBJECTIVE: The goal of this report is to demonstrate that there are adequate unoccupied parking spaces in the 1000 ft radius of the building at 516,522 and 524 Mandalay Avenue that would atlow a change of use of the building with a restriped parking tot that has one handicapped and 6 regular parking spaces.This report will utilize the information gathered from Nolan's Pub in Safety Harbor and Rosie's Tavern in Dunedin to arrive at the number of parking spaces needed for the project. BACKGROUND: Project owner proposes to rehabilita#e and change the use af approximately 1,624 gross square ft of the vacant office building located at 522 and 524 Mandalay Ave. in Clearwater, Florida (parcel number: 05-29-15-57924000-0070 Pinellas County Property Appraiser) into an up-scale Bistro (1,378 sq. ft.)that provides Craft Beer, mid- upscale wine and cold snacks or snacks that could be warmed up in a microwave (the p�oject does not include a kitchen) and a mortgage office (246 sq.ft. ). Cork N Brew's hours of operation are 4 p.m.to 3 a. m.Tfie Pub has an inside seating capacity of 31 and an outside seating for 18. The maximum capacity for this Bistro is 49 u::� ia ��i��'� `to�m Z rwr�l�v 11Ai... 1:.�.1 'll ,. ,.a.� � ��N�..y22s. ��2y�� ►�� Ne�aie �7�i�r1 y �.m. io 5 p.m. nours with one employee. The rest of the building (2,361 sq. ft.) is unoccupied at this time but could be occupied by a realtor's office with 5 employees operating 9 a.m.to 5 p.m. METHODOLOGY: Prior to conducting this analysis a methodology meeting was held with the City of Clearwater staff. It was agreed that AQC would conduct a parking accumulation study of a similar facility. Two project sites were approved by the City staff, Nolan's Pub in Safety Harbor and Rosie's Tavern in Dunedin. It was also suggested to record the available parking at the vicinity of the project on Mandalay Ave. between Baymont and Bay Esplande Avenue. , Parking lot#36 as well as street parking on Baymont street, Rockaway street and Bay Esplande. The hours of study were established to be (Tuesday, Wednesday or Thursday) and Saturday between the hours of 7 to 10 PM. The parking counts were conducted on Saturday December 10`h and Wednesday December 7.4. ._,_.. .... _ ....__. _.. . _. � � � I� � 1�' [� ' b �..��.� �E� � � ��t� t3tvE�.t�:��y*,.:;��T SE�ui�� i��T� �iTY C'f= �:l.E�I�U�r�T��i _ _ _ CITY OF CLEARWATER CODE REQUIEMENTS: Per Section 2-802 (Flexible standard development for Tourist District) of the City of Ciearwater Community Development Code: 3 to 4 spaces per 1000 gross floor area are required for office use and 10/1000 spaces per 1000 gross floor area are required for nightclub. _..__..____ _..____�.__....-.,�. 1,378 S.F. gross floor area...nightclub.......with 3 employees. j �� L� � � Q C� � �v �� 2,361 S. F. gross floor area ...office....with 6 employees. - �j �� 2�� t 246 5. F. gross floor area ...office....with 1 emptoyees. a�£�'�l.:'' `�::�v� ��R�stCESOEPT� Note: Hooters at Clearwater beach parking study has shown that 70%of the empioyees�d�i e�T��- — (Table A)Maximum Parking Spaces Needed Per Code WEEKDAY WEEKEND USE Night Day Day Night 5 p.m. to 9 a.m. 9 a.m. 5 p.m. to 3 a.m. 5 p.m. 5 p.m. 3 a.m. Office(246 GFA) 0 .98 0 0 A 3 to 4 spaces per 1000 GFA : .98 spaces maximum Office (2, 361 GFA) 0 9.4 0 0 @ 3 to 4 spaces per 1000 GFA : 9.4 spaces maximum Night c(ub (1,378GFA) 13.7 0 0 13.7 @ 10 spaces per 1000 GFA: 13.7 Spaces Totat spaces 13.7(14) 10.4(10) 0 13.7(14) Maximum Also Institute of Transportation Engineers for Land Use 701 Office Buiiding, page 173 shows a maximum Peak Period Demand of(3.44<4 used above per code)/1000GFA The calculation results in a worst case condition of 24 required parking spaces per code only if we assume that the offices and the Bistro will be in operation at the same time and we do not use the resutts of the study conducted on the beach that indicates only 70% of the employees drive to work. The proposed project provides 6 on-site parking spaces and one handicapped parking space.This results in a deficit of 18 parking spaces DATA COLLECTION , Nolan's Pub , SAFETY HARBOR: Nolan's pub on Main street in Safety Harbor has a gross floor area of 1000 sq. ft. and a total capacity of 50 customer .The maximum number of customers were 35 on Saturday December tenth. The owner and operator was interviewed and it was aiso observed that at least 20°6 of the patrons walked to the pub where 80% drove. From this data coilection (see Tabie B beiow) it was realized that the pub was 35/50=70%occupied at its peak time-- -----.----.. . _.__.._. Table B � D � � D.��.� '� Peak Occupancy FEB � � ,�� Nolan's Pub Harborside,100 Main Street,Safety Ha;Bbi�ELC'r��it gE�VE�Fc� pEPT _,�._.CIT`! �?F CLEARb'U�TER � WEEKEND, Dec. 10, 2011 WEEKDAY, Dec. 14, 2011 ^`�� Period % 96 Number of Occupied Number of Occupied customers customers 7;00 PM 15 3096 11 22% 8:00 PM 17 34% 14 28% 9:00 PM 30 60% 15 30% 10:00 PM 35 709b 27 54% Maximum Capacity:50 DATA COLLECTION, Rosie's Tavern , Dunedin, FL: Rosie's Tavem is located at 730 Broadwav in DowntQ�nrn 9�ner�in= �t ha� a arncc fln�r �ro� �f - o. ..., 810 sq.ft. and a totaf capacity of 38 customer.The maximum number of customers were 35 on Saturday December tenth. The owner and operator was interviewed and it was also observed that at least 20°r6 of the patrons walked to the pub where 80% drove, From this data collection (see Table C below) it was realized that the pub was 32/38=84%occupied at its peak time. Table C, Rosie's Tavern,730 Broadway in Dunedin WEEKEND, Dec. 10, 2011 WEEKDAY, Dec. 14, 2011 Period % % Number of Occupied Number of Occupied customers customers 7:00 PM 28 73% 8 2'1% 8:00 PM 32 8496 1 2.6% 9:00 PM 22 58% 10 26% 1 Q:00 PM 25 b6% 12 32% Maximum capacity 38 --------- ---- — -------------------------� Rosie's Tavern � 35 � i y 30 �— �-� --- I � 25 — � _ . � i � � �-- , +� � j � 20 � — � � 15 - ----- � � � - - Seriesl I � � i � 10 -- ------- ----- i 3 � i = 5 -- ----- ----- � � 0 . � � ' f 6:00 PM 7:12 PM 824 PM 9:36 PM 10:48 PM � � Time of the day , � � _� - -� Weekend Data DATA COILECTiON,within 1000ft of the project: The number of unoccupied parking spaces at the vicinity of the project were recorded on Saturday December 10th and Wednesday December 14 as listed below.The hours of study were Pctah�icharl tn hQ 7_1(1 PM, • Mandalay Ave. between Baymont street and Bay Esplande Avenue. • Parking lot#36 • street parking on Bayrnont street, Rockaway street and Bay Esplande. Tabie D Total Available Parking within 1000 ft Total Available - � �- : Parking within �� `�� . i � 1000 ft � 11 availab{e » Location parking spaces � � '�E,B 1 � �� lot#36 10 � - ' 5 � I�EpT �: MandalayAve 22 � vEt�'�,'��•�'� ��,i��kf f�� C1tV C� ClE�tii�#�T�1�_.,.......: Baymmont N/S 25 _ Bay Esplande E 16 Rockaway N/W 7 available parking 220 Table E Number of parked cars Saturday December 10�` Location 7 PM 8 PM 9 PM 10 PM lot#36 35 28 30 19 Mandalay Ave 3 0 0 0 Baymmont N/5 22 15 14 14 Bay Espiande E 0 0 0 Rockaway N/W 1 0 0 0 total paarked cars 61 43 44 33 Table F Number of unoccuaied pubiic parkin�spaces Saturdav December lOth #of parking spaces availabie within 1000 ft of the project Location 7 PM 8 PM 9 PM 10 PM lot#36 115 122 120 131 �A�.,.J�1�.. A.. �n �� nanva�ar r�� 17 GL GL L� Baymmont N/S 3 10 11 11 Bay Espiande E 16 16 16 1fi Rockaway N/W 6 7 7 7 available parking 159 177 176 187 Tabie G Number of Parked Cars Wednesday December 14 ,�` ��.a--�� w � 7 PM, 8 PM, 9 PM, 10 PM, ,��, focation 2011 2011 2011 2011 u��u �� ; ,� +��s,. (ot#36 26 28 19 11 ";�� o �� Mandalay Ave 3 4 4 2 ,�-,; � �,� �� .�S J Baymmont N/S 5 7 4 3 f�l' � �-�� Bay Esplande E 0 0 0 0 {�} �w �,::� � : r Rockaway NJW 0 0 0 0 i��'�i °"��' -'�� total paarked cars 34 39 27 16 — ,,��---� �' � 1 � .r. _._� , Table H Number of unoccunied nubiic aarkine spaces Wednesdav December 14th #of parking ,------=_1 � spaces available W � within 1000 ft of �j c��°C.,. the project `�" +�- U�[ � � �� 7 PM, 8 PM, 9 PM, 10 PM, ,�„ Y►� ; �� focation 2011 2011 2011 2011 �. '� .�;� 'Y lot#36 124 122 131 139 �.~`� � �" Mandalay Ave 19 18 18 20 �b`'a �--+- Ba mmont N S 20 18 �-;�'�'""""`�`�-' ��`'"' Y / 21 22 � � .a� __ Bay Esplande E 16 16 16 16 • °° �� Rockaway N/W 7 7 7 7 available parking 186 181 193 204 PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS: From our previous analysis we know that there is a deficiency of 18 parking spaces for the project. Table D shows that there are 220 public parking spaces in the 1000 ft radius of the project. Table F shows that at its peak use,there are at least 159 parking spaces availabte and unoccupied in the vicinity of the project. 159»18 needed spaces. Also the maximum number of occupants for Cork-N-Brew was estabiished to be 49. From our counts and observation at Nolan's Pub and Rosie's Tavern it was established that at the peak week night Nolan's Pub was occupied at 54%. On the weekend, Rosie's Tavern was 84% occupied at the peak time. Using this data,the maximum projected occupancy for Cork-N-Brew is: (84%)*(49)=41 on weekends and (54%)*(49}=27. As mentioned above at least 159 unoccupied parking spaces are available in the vicinity of the pro}ect. 159»41 needed spaces. Please keep in mind that as it was observed in most cases guests arrived with at least another one or two guests so it is not expected that each guest needs one parking space. coNC�usioN: As demonstrated in this analysis, the proposed 6 regular and one handicapped parking spaces adequately address the needs of the project. This analysis also addresses the requirements of the Institute of Transportation Engineers (iTE) Parking Generation. lt should also be noted that the site is accessible by bus and many patrons or employees could be riding the bus or their bikes to reach the project site. They coutd also be walking from the Condominium high rise an the west side of Mandalay or across the street. If you have any questions regarding this report please contact me at 727-543-1458. Sincerely, American Quality Consuftants, LLC ��-- �-�f� �'� w M __..�;�- , � �� ,>�, ��. Mahshid Arasteh, PE- Principal in charge ;� o ;� °� � ��:� , � ��--� e„'; n'J ��.�..ti� ° r{„� ��i� �� W �:;fJ �1P�` � ��- �,i� ----,r•---�� r�. � :.,.� ---, �� -- - - - � a�� r..Ja.� �1rf�l�. � . . . .r+r1+.�...�„ 3/��Y � � `�JJ� ��''i ' �f I -�+-� — �� : .., .. ., ..�.� .r'` � •i � . . y r„+:,e� g '' � `...�y ! IIR�'�. t .: �.._ ,,�� t�..ssr��t'�° � � i.� I:_R) :. m ��a .x ' ,k� , ,�� .�;�� (��t �!9 �,..� �.�� .�I � ''o-�' : 'e i z�jt rs, �_ � A � �'� . �a�:J� '' ( M'�Yd(� {�� 1 � � t �i.y� .�� ' � • ��7 � t�� :i r° ? �� _�r�✓ f r � ��a � II �� f r; : �, � R' ;�tT� r�'" 4.' �b i�r ��a I �T � 1� 1 -`'.i ro�� °xh � a :,� .. E � r i r � , .� I :J � � � .�.. . �... s� ,��"�- � i � "r r1 F� i r t� � � ��,� � � i �.:N '�A+,t$ y,p� ,�a� I��,'yt°" �'R.� .. Y �. ' ..� ��9"1 I�j ' • Sfr t:L4 ' � M�l�-Ir�,-,��N 5� �V � � �� I il ' �, �/�'9 � : G 41 ' �-',J �.. r ,f��" a='t`1�1'� � . ��x�a, rr ��`"d?Yt��r - � L'�� •�� Fq t�?�� J�l � �.;,�:.- ;� �� 1 � I�' � � 1 tr�r ,.�� cr 'G� t _, �� ?";� �'�. '��p 1 �' ��f; � � tF �, . � �'.'�'a�� .��r� ,cc�t �'��' a N a , � �p q�` � y� .�3.:.. {S :Fl �e�.3 I I ,y�� :�. � I:��' �s� r.�- �� ` t,.�4�`I, T�(�� r� � J�� 7I'... 7N ��.�~ �� . I � '��. � ` �`�� ..• a '�I ; I �+ '� r��. ;�'+l 1. : I v�r � _ . . ,� {t 4 t 4v� tl N I �" P� �'.� '1 L �Iv' i (°f . �' � � 1 (�` , 1�, ,fbY'�kY��b �"''1 -A . . i p�� i , . .K.. �I I �y��µ� � •�r ~ Q � .ij" ( ,;'� �i A�H) � ,� a �; �' i • v:��.".�3G:S a ��'� ' � ' , ' Z F"' � � ! � �... � � .,. :� Y ^ ' } � ^� � d � ��`; `�' ,��; �k �:�'� � � n >� `�f ��.�, 4 � `�.� � J � ` .� � � � "rtt � ( �.. �� V ..y,t�:._�. ` i. .._ r<��: N � '�� sr A,: �w�M:a �,a i';.',.�.+- . t� ��'�� I t'i� ��+1 f u �' i r' i�ri;y64 %� /�/_�/� ' . Aa E ""1 '.� � `I �� L V! a�; -,�., �-� � . .. ' ,. . tu � .MANDALAY /#VE. . - �� , �, �.; �� w Z `' C�� l , :� �o � � � � � � � ,. . � � � ��'�� . � �� py��y� ",_�s,,{{�1,M' - •.q, ;, .—_ ' . , i '1 � � � �nr�� t Q V .= � I` p �9��j",b, . S'� d' , � rf��7 _ ga�r�''k�::� � � t� !. � , '^ :. 1 �,�� "��'S,!> � � �... ( ��; �a � . t i �� r��y '� 4-� U � !A� i i. �� .�. � �' : � �,:':, x -.��t f��'��y.� E6 i. 0 . �`' a �,tr'N 7� i� ��a, ,�'Ct ,� ,�i � '"' � � �6�.�s ... -e`�� 4�.4ti� y�� M ' �^" ti s� � i !� �� "• `� � r.,.m��(� -4. .}iS�,y-�• � ; �:3+�� -• �:�y�-;'a4',� .. �. � lr e3:�^�x �kTM�'ft��,.-+� �.._ �`� �,� �� .. ' ..>• �� ' ` '. ...'��. 3' ' . I �t t �, .�''��"3 �.�, k ' a ��3 K �.-,,�`fi� 6 �r^a, f, ��' ��. � '_ � ��`�� • i r i`�,t..s. !.��p�� ,.� • ,�} Y :�I .�,�� "'s .r�',�i �'�,.�,�kr,.'� a�^�:�°�P.�'�' , � xy,. �y� ,;.:� .� � �6 �6'i'"1" '��3.T \� � rl . a tA) ��." � t r'" �v° .� z. � ttes�.: 'E�'' � i�t °� �' f� : *�� _,, � r 1... � � � :i' � xr • 1'„' , " � f•. � � i1�j� t�}� X.� � v Tn�� . d f 4� I f 1 S ..S�]• '� "'" � y 3 ,�..;� . - � (."�-�!� I p � '7�aa,q4pf �� q7r�nu � � rf�'ra v{ . �t'4 J( l ' t � . 4� (i ,:(7 ttJt'�"�� s.�`C i � � 'S�� „3�`V•,; " �ti�� ,� � � ^y��' �� e � j t , ' 'P' �y.i` � L (�' . - �, �y.9 � �, � l. � H, �� •.� ' y �- ` , � ' I� `i�+',� !B@ p'�,,� � , �7 g.'„ r r� ��l r�t°` �� 1° ti '�'j�'j�—�, �■—;.� ra C � �q�. �?� C. C'.. �'. r t. , j 1 I tf t�t �C T E' ''z.� ^�"�1 Sctu°�,j�� . i : �1 1 I 1 I! ';.\ � . '� ,�4�l" � M"'i o •� S I�,�^ � L � a, j� 7., 7 �ws`'�; �� ' � r� � r ��C}.�' o+ � �L, .;-, {Y'4 5..._ , •a_ !,J i �{ �.�� ( �; �� i � �YjF�. IS i� rL 1�� ,• o �' 1,a,T'.'S• �t , �ir�� I�J.t; .�.4i ..r rph*,��, � ,^ r ��'.�, �ro1� ; l t � p—{ � N �� ' t 7 ' .. f' � u tT�. � �w� �I ,�„ . 1 t m,g , 1 f �('� .r d ' ,i �.�. � c .. ... .� t � 1`A`;. . .�.. 1' '. `. '� � ��..kf h � _ .y1��?1 �t t '� 'Q C q � IC �O � ..� �'� ._ • _ .�.-..,.,,�,.... .� �' U O ia •�'� .. �I s q n 1— . •� � , , ./" `,"��" � � 1 ro l. o � v . � ., �O n • „ . � � .�N � �,Ti a J , ,. , W �� .�.< �,:.�. i�� ,. • 0 m` � ocae.cr..ea �QC°� .. �� /w�, Z � f•C(I `^ Y . . ' LL O t. , 4^mr p y. U . . . ��y� 2 " • ' , '+-a s c y'^��b,h,t �. ' r� . .. � r. r o ., c: r. • " . GMF • • ;�v:``- ROCKAWAY STREET N 5 Hour Limit -$1.00/hr. Mon-Fri; $1.25/hr. *Weekends � Seasonal � Meters enforced 6am-1am everyday Total Rockaway St Spaces 7 Totat H/C Spaces 0 2 Hr. Spaces � 5 Hr.Spaces 7 North Side (East to West) South Side (East to West) Toial�versized 5paces 0 7 5 � � Q 4 4 LOT � 2 D � 4 1 � �d�—� p- w °�� cn w� � w►—: v�; � �� s Q � �w ,-- --� �—U ' Z �7J �u.. � W .;C) 1.4, ;' 7r ;� �yr .�,C� j' laJ a '� r^"�i ti� . � "Weekends(Saturday�Sunday) Seasonal(March 8 April everyday) NOTE: 12i11l84-Converted to$.50/F�r. Rwming 11/92-Converted to$.75/hr. Record $/3/00-Increased Rate to$1.00/hr. when repiaced with MacKay Electronic Meters 1/1/01 -Seasonai and weekend rates in effect. 6121/11 -Meters#42329,31,33,35,37,39,�41 removed -(7 metersj Customers will use Lot 36 Pay� 10/20l2011 �� LOT #36 - R�CKAWAY N 5 Hour Limit-$1.00/hr Mon-Fri; $1.25/hr*Weekends �Seasonal � Meters Enforced 6am-1 am eve da TOTAL Spaces �t a5 Ba Es lanade TOTAL H!C 5 WaterFront Row Center Aisle Park Side - .- _•= -=� `� -- - (North to South) f North to South) (North to South) TOTAL OVERSI�� 0 H/C 363 914 115 � 40 3� 113 116 Pay 8�Display meters 2 41 112 117 5 am says pre-pay 3 42 111 118 Meter enforced fi am-1 am 4 43 110 119 1 am-5 am says dosed � 44 �qg �20 No All Day Parking s q5 q pg 121 Ma�dmum 5 hours 7 46 107 �ZZ g 47 106 123 g 48 105 124 10 49 104 125 11 50 103 H/C �y 51 102 H/C access 13 52 36-5 101 HIC Q 14 53 3� 100 126 �, 15 54 99 127 � m 16 55 98 128 � c 17 56 97 129 � 18 57 96 130 36-1 �` H/C (Entrance to Pier) 58 95 131 Walkway 59 94 132 36-2 60 93 133 19 61 92 1� 20 62 81 135 -__.�.--�- �..��,.«� �� _ 2� 63 90 136 •�,�""—� � 22 g4 gg 137 3�� O } 23 65 88 138 , � v�a 24 66 36-� 87 139 ; � -�"'j i 25 67 368 86 140 .`_�;,�.� � x� 26 68 85 141 ¢ ;,-^'� � �w 27 69 84 142 -' *'"' r—J 28 70 83 143 I�� g ��u. ,�r!?) 29 71 82 444 ,`�a�'� � `=y 30 72 81 145 t L,�,�} ',,� 31 73 80 , �� E 32 74 79 -� iv � ,r--�r�----- ^'� � �'M 33 75 78 ------,V,--.:Y='.-�_._. 34 76 36-9 35 n 3�-�0 36 3� 'Weekends(Saturday&Sunday) 38 Seasonal(March�Aprit everyday) 39 H/C Frenchy�s Rockawa St. Note: 11/64 Converted to$.25130 min. 10/1/92 Resident Parking Permits valid in Rockaway Lot 12►92 Converted to$.75/hr. 12l6/94 Installed electronic meters#36001/17/21840 rtunninp 7/1t1997 POM electronic meters installed#35001-36078 Record 3122/00 MacKay electronic meters instalied;increase rate to$1/hr. 1/1l01 Seasona!and weekend rates in effect 1120111 145 MacKay Meters removed and 10 Cale Mui6-space pay stations installed.36001 - 3/2312011 aiwwene � ONOWBR �� E i' \ A . .. • ��` . ._.__�_. .._ __......_ _....�....____�_.__. ....__.... __ __ _ .. . ..�._ -� _._z _.. __ _ �..._ �W:; ; o -,�,vo � � I � �3� C—�1.1 ( I I I=�,�o — LOT 36 �-�- ROCKAWAY r,•q s•7 6"s �.3 .�'�� ;, � _� I,I,I I I I I�I I„111_I.�I I,LI11 J_�l�.l l..l g. , � �� ._.�1� . T�I I I I �I I I;CI f T I I I ° IT�� B � AI � YI C A ,� 'C_f_�_l_.l_I l I ��..� ,N� ��.i i � � � i � �.� s W __._._...________, ._ ______..•..._____. -- ------ P A ��.z. �� a�-i L Y — R a N S nr:w A �' � n�a�neoun p _ . F . '�i � � � � � �4� � � � � �EB � � 20i� I,� ��u��r}�-��vi SE�uiGFa OEPT� CStY CF �l.EA�tJ�A�Er�w.,_..,. � °�� MANDALAY AVEtVUE N 5 Hour Limit(or as noted) -$1.00/hr. Mon-Fri; $1.25/hr. *Weekends 8�Seasonal �- Meters enforced 8am-6pm everyday West Side (North to South) East Side (North to South) N ` � Totai Mandalay Ave.Meters 108 M „a, ToYal H/C Spaces 1 � � 2 Hr.Meters -:.z; Avaton to Kendall i= 5 Hr.Meters 59 Rova!to Juanita Timed Spaces 7 42430 Total Oversized Spaces 4 42428 42426 Meters in italics-Single Head 42424 42422 s� 42420 42418 42416 42414 Entrance to Lot#39 42472 42410 42408 � � a 42406 42404 e 4 LOT � 42402 D � Q 42400 42398 42396 42409 2 Fsr.only F/Z 42407 2 hr.or�ty 42394 l 4I40$?h;,nnly, weoee 1 '7iJ.'!L Power Pole 42390 42403 2 nr.onlY 42388 � 42401 2 nr.oniy 42386 uz 42384 0 42399 2 hr.or.1y 42382 42397 2 hr.only 42380 �; 42395 2 i�r.only 42378 ±� '� 42393 2 hr.only 42376 � a 42391 2 hr.oniy 42374 �� 42389 2 hr.oniy 42372 � �3i�f us a—� 42370 � � �%�' 42368 '� � f� 42366 �—�— cY: �� :f,ui Kendall to Bav Esplanade Juanita to Bav Esplanade �w� '� r-c� 42387 (�� W ;i� 42385 � � �--- �,l„ � � 42383 ��-� s'— �,O ��Ir.�^i � +u �+ � Page 1 of 3(Mandalay Ave.) Bav Esolanade to Rockawav Bav Esptanade to Bavmorrt 423 4231 q234 42314 42347 � 42312 4y 42310 � Oversize Vehicis On1y 4 42306 Oversize Vehicie Qnty 42302 Oversize Vehicle Onty 24'-40'Only � �a �aass Oversize Vehicie ONy (Ambler to Baymont) LOT Rockawav to Bavmont a 47 �' CNV 4232� p �4 42325 42323 Q 4�� 42321 42292 42319 42290 42288 � 42286 Bavmont to San Marco 42284 42317 2 hr.oniy Driveway to Belie Harbour 4Z315 2 hr.oNy 42313 2 hr.only 42311 2 hr.only 42309 2 nr.only DNV s� 42307 2 hr.oniy 42305 2 hr,oniy 42303 2 hr.only 42301 2 hr.only 42299 2 hr.only 4229T 2 hr.only 42295 2 hr.only San Marcoto Papava 42285 2 hr.oniy 42283 2 hr.oniy 42281 2 hr.only 42279 2 hr.oniy � 42277 2 hr.oniy ,, 42275 2 hr.ony � � � � 42273 2 hr.onfy Alley '� � ��"'""� .:� H/C �—� t�s� 42269 2 hr.only � � .r�� 42267 2 hc oniY 50 � � " t/�t,u i 42265 2 hr.oniy �y ��;�Y? 42263 2 hr.only � . � ��` � '� ' � �r n w Paaava to Roundabout ��i '°°' � a 42247 2 hr.only �� ; p� 42245 2 hr.oniy - 4 2 2 4 3 2 hr.on ly 5 0 �S �:�¢ 42241 2 hr.oniy �--� _.+��• 42239 2 hr.oniy � DNV(Hilton) ��--'� � y 42237 2 hr.oniy ,,,,,._ . .,.,.�, 42235 2 hr.oNy 42233 2 hr.oniy 42231 2 hr.oniy 42229 2 hr.only 42227 2 hr.only 10 42225 2 hr.oniy 42223 2 hr.only 42221 2 hr.oniy 42279 2 hr.oniy Page 2 of 3(Mandalay Ave.) 6/6/2011 i�ps�� BAY ESPLANADE N 5 Hour Limit- $1.00/hr. Mon-Fri; $1.25/hr. *Weekends � Seasonal � Meters enforcec!8am-6pm Mon-Sat; 12:30pm-6pm Sun TOTAL 16 South Side (west to East) Idorth Side (East to west) TOTAL H/C o Palm Pavillion -rQt3� QyeTSiZ°S�aces a 1ot36 UZ-(aprox 40' long) No Parking Fire DepL �� Hess Statwn Mandalay Ave. Entrance to Lot#38 1 2 3 4 5 Q 6 7 � � a $ ,� LOT � 9 pOQ "NO PARKING"(Hydrant) 10 11 Entrance o Lot#38 �..,.�..�.. ,,,.....-s 12 Q �;.� w � r 14 �� ' � ; v:�.�� c�:-- 15 "�' �'�' � �, � 16 � � �'� ':� �.�,� r+� ��u� �'�--�, '-' !�� /,'J� � ��u. �l�_J � -�t) *`..� ,� f�A� i J� .!�•�T...._.�� #� � *Weekends(Saturday 8�Sunday) _r��_,_-i._.�� Seasonal{March �Aprii everyday) NOTE: 1?J84-Converted to$.25/30 Min. 11192-Converted to$.25/20 Min. R�'�a 5/30/00-Increased rate to$1.00/hr when replaced with MacKay Electronic Meters 1/1/01 -Seasonal and weekend rates in effect. 8/4/11 -Meters#42328,30,32,34,36,38,40,42,44,46,48,50,52,54,56,8�58 removed {16 meters) - customers to use the pay stations in Lot 38 10124/11 -New enforcement hours due to Pks 8� Rec program -from 8-6 Mon-Fri� 12:30-6pm Sun to 11am to 6 pm Mon-Fri (excluding Holiday), 12:30-6 pm Sundays 8 8 -6pm Saturdays & Holidays) 10/2012011 � � � 3 � ?.4 �" �� '��'a �� e �� '�� As noted, �sak oarking demand ra�es J�%�fS di�ier�n:betv��er sitss!cca:ed in sa�urban ss�nos:�d those loca�ed in urban serings�or the ir.depencier:vari�ble 1:00��.:�. GFA.The in�ivid�:ai site surieys did no�enabie a quanu�ative expiana�ion oz�he�acors iha��used�fse d��erence. �ne�o�nn��f explanatior m2y relaie to di��erencns i�::�e avai{Gb�1i�y c�aliemaave modss (�or example:�r�nsi�, bir�and pedesi�an)av^aiiable a:ihs urban sites. O�:hn s�ud;es�vi�h data on trarsit 2vaifabili:y an� preserce o}� �DM program:_3�e subLr�an si�es rep��ied abou�55 p�rc�n�r�:ith avaiiaoie�ransit ssrvices an�20 percen��nrith TDit�l p�ocrams.The urbQn si:�s raao��d i00 psrc�n:=r��:r a��iaal�:�-a�s„and 83 aercen: �Niih 3�tt�i pregrams o�some ia:-m. UVe@kend parking demand dG�v,r�CB 3Vc11H�i7FE^ci tiY0 Si'�Ci�SIiBS_I=�i Of18��i2;�I?�S^cF[;i d^a%�c��c r.^.^1�itd was less zhan i0 percen�oi peGk vaeefcday dern��d a:ihe sare sre.�;i�ne e�ner si��;�ne S2z�rday ar.d �unday demand approacned 90 cerceni��h�v�s�kday peak deman��r�hE sarre siie. i�ti�as<<oc DOS$i��8 i.0 CfEf1V°f@�12Q�2 WEBiC�ftCf(Jai�CIRU C�@17?8C1Ci 1'2i°�G3�@ LO[SC%C Ci li IFOiffta QR Oil i�S°71aiUf�Oi LNOriC corduc_ed during tne weekend a:�hs�F�o s'rces. The s�ze oz ore site(i.9 million so.�.GFA)resui�zd in a data ploi��ith a scale it?at did noi�i!o�:�zhz 12 data poin*�s�or sRes less ihan�OO,Q00 sq.��. G�,�:o be reasonGbly diszinguish2d��r Lser analysis. There�ore,ihe large si�e ivas noi inc(uded:n u�e daia pio�;o�urban sizes.T.�e peak oarking demand �a�e fior�he 1.9 million sq.�.GFA si�e uvas 2.58 vshicles per 1;OCQ sq_tt. GFA:which v�ras a��roximaisiy the same as:he averags forthe oiner 92 s�udy si=es. The zoflo�nring�aoie presen�s�e iime-af-day disTi�utior.s oi pa;:cing demand�ra�ia�ion�or suburbar ard urban sites.i he only sites included in�he�abfe da�a�Nere tnose inat subrniited a:feasi iour consecu�ive hours oi parking demand observ�ons(r.ote.�ye m�jor�:y oi u`�a paricirg demand daia in�he overalf da�abase consisted oi one or�NO hcurly ob��ni��on�j. � Based an Jehicles per 1 TNeekday Sarb�rr�ar.• Data �`Vee�rda�tlrbart Dafa ; �>000 sy.tt cFA � , } Hour 3eginnirtg Percent oi , Number o7 D�±a � °ercent of Peak ! Numbsr of Data { I o L o ,,,�r i r�..•.,,..+. ! -�_,_a I • � °� �^.,v � u+�iea r�iiuu �Ui71i5� � 'IZ.00--�.OQ G.m. � ! 0 __ � __L— O I 5:00 a.m. j - _ ' 0 ' - _ � _ 0 I 6:00 a.n. ' S ' i � - ; D � i j �_oo a.m. ; 56 2 ! 20 i 2 .,..._ 08 0 a.rr,. j ^ 86 ; ;i ' 68 ! �'. i , ��'�� }' �9:00 a.m. i 97 _ ; _ i 3 i 9p � � --� ;� ' t�i.t ( �0_003.��,. j �oo ! -��2 ; �s I -- °� [ 11:00 a_m. � ?8 ; '2 i - 95 ; � '�� +;� ; i2:00 e.m. � S7 ? i� ; g� i ^ _. i � �'�--. ,�: j 9:00 p.m. - 1 _ 75 ; 6 ' °6 i 4 C.�"---' � ,� I 2:40 p_m. j S� ? 6 ; iC4 � L---- ..� ��., � ! 3:�0�.m. � 8� -- . � � --- oG � — � �; ��.i2.�� - 4:00 p.m. -- �3 ; --� � --- ; p2 -i - ,, -- __._� � '�: � b:QO p.m. -�� ; f ; 6� -- � � - �rf�l� � �6:00 n ; 'i& -- ; - � � _ —�-- � - - !i_ , �:eo o.�. ' ` - i o �— ; - o - ' �''-'��p `� 8:D0 p.m. -- j _ i 0 _ [ _ ; -� _--- #„ _. -' t� I °:04 .m. - � 0 ; - � 0 i�:� "�°_ u , _�_ __ _ 90:OOp.m. � - j r j _ ; p _ ._ _. -- --_ ; ..._ _......_. . - ; ii:00 p.m_ - - � 0 � -- - _ � 0 'Subse#of da�abase �4�'.?.:{:`�. ?�Ci:��.:.�.�... :f*::-�c-.. �7f'� --�. '_ _"_. _ _ �7 iI ' .. _........,..._.�._..... " s„- .�` ° � '�' _ �:§`�+a'i °�."�,.��@'�t.3 ��= _ `:,a � .�: �, - - ��:�'�� :��3�a�l�fi�� Tne parki[1Q d8�C1c^•itd SFUd18S til Ff'.2 d2i�DaS°TO�tt'lIS[BiiCi USc iVcfc CO:":�UCiEC i�O^ i��i(�iv^L'�'�L174;_ i h�foliov�rng�abte summarizes:he cg8 07 if12�a«se;znc pr°senis:ne�verage N�e°ZaaY a�aK�:�ri�� aacking d�mand raiia for eacn chronologi�i�irr:e p°riar.5v�ur�a�Gnd ur'oan sres ar�mi:.ed in ine:ao;e data se�. Ii is�viden�{rosn the ia�le�Y�BL pcfWR�c�8�:'1flRC YQT?;'•iS�8i1Q s?Sc r=.5�Ot C�ailg�a Siib�ZBfl�tatl% over time(in terms o;ve�icies pe�au:Iding square�cc_age;. � TI7772 paTlOd Oi ' ; � �a�ng�� i Av�ge Week�ay Peak ; Parking r�smand Studies 1N'rt+rin ;' ; Stvdy ` r'eriod Parksng i?emand Ratio � Tim�Perioci ; { .�2� ; Parked Vehic�es oer 3,�00 sy. tiu�nbar o� i _ �aresriags of � E ��r;� � S�;dv Saes i �niiT2�a'i3 Sei;°:.� 1 — j 7 , n , i 970—i 97S i 2.8 --- — �-- — ' 1978-1979 _ 3.l — ' i! � a � i 2.� l8 ! i0 i i 198 ._._ _ — — -- --- i 1982 i 2.5 27 ;_ 15 -- 1�83 1 _ 2.7 ___ l 2 i __ ' � �+ ---_ j 198� � 2.0 — � 3�-- ; -- '7-- � 198�-- °86 i �_° —� �� — — '' —— 1987-999G ! 3_C _! i6 � --- i99i 2./ i �% — � . ' ' 2.8 7 � _, i i i99��5$0^ � ---- — ; — _ � 799$-200 i 2.8 L_-- s , i _ 3 i �oi8i _ 2_S i �85 ' iG0 ! �n examination o�the day-o�-w�ek�rends o�par:cing demand?or aii�tudy si�es i��i;is�and�se:nd�caied iha:w°ekday peak perioe�ar':cing demand ien�ed to bs at ts highest�or a siie on a Frday.�°next highesi weekdGy�or parking demand�Nas obssrved�o b2 on a�uesday. DaiG:vere provided ior G#elevison siai9on and o��!ce ir a suburban lo�iion. 1is paak period demand H}i�cQicu iv uiii^ci�i^v�T+^vi^��C�.^.°.S:^i.^,:S i8^�°.:S°8!�n!�?��harasn�a enrlu�ec'�7rQm:ha daiab�se.i hs site was 8,2�0 sq_Z. G�l�,and had 86 employses,4vith�arki�g supply raiios o;0_8 s�ecas p�r 1_Ov�J sq. �i. GFA and 0.6�spaces per�mpioyee_Peak parking de�nand ifvas counced�or i2�orsecui'sv�i�ou�s during two v�eekdays and ihe site'�ps&k pa1'ki��g period Vias beiween�:00�nd�:0^u p.m.i he peak parking damar,d ratios wQre 8.25 vehicles per�,000 sa,.��. G�4 and 0.79 venicles par empioyes. Daia were provids�To;a credi��ard p�ocessing o1;ic�;i1 a suburban focaiion_ics peak�eriod Cem�r� appeared ia di�;er:rom o�h�r o�ces in�h;s land use ar,c w�s�here�ore exciud��rom;ne csa�ab�se.�ne � ' �00 sq_�:. GF�_ Peak pa,-k� ...�.�.�_:__�.,.,....__� siie�rras 73;300 sq.:i. G��;,�,viih a parlcing suppfy ratio�;3�spac..s p�r :, : d2rnand was coun:�d;or?9 consecuiiv�nours durin�i�vo v��zekdays Mnd tne siTs��sGk parkina�c;ie��=-� � was bei��en 9:OQ and i0:L0 a.m.�he peG�c oarking demand�a�o�.ss 5.57 renE�fes�e�i,�00 sq.=�.'---�-�-�....>.<,-�,c�� i�L,-� n. U3LL1� r�j-`t. . i.. U.!b---. -�� +ta+� ;,3�� ' -.* �. �a� � � � �r .__.J ;'�',: � 4i...ii . �1�iJ{. �� '-� f�;a ' . -�1 't.£.=' � �r � �� 1,�_ � ,. ' �,�� ,.. _ "� :� �._ ____- ,� :;�__..�- sas. ��, -_�.� �7� -__ - .- - - �-••• --'" ' v A.- .—`?!� ��%:a:�.;s '��:= s�� _ � �� - �� :��;:1:�;�:�s� �1�di�ionai T3ata ° �A°CIiIC S;UCJ�°S CO�I{3U�� IT:pCVtlRLD1JJ�i S�QQS�OC:lR!°i1:BC ,'J2:k3R^y C2LicS�.^,E�J°@^ l.t`}i 8�tCi �_Q vehi�ies per'i,000 s�.:i. GFA in s�L:ings s�rit;� �;-FCed pa;:cir:g a�d:vi��e hich qua!iy:rznsi;op?ons 2x�Si. ° rni SIU�}rZ GDC1C�tUCi2Ci ��K;Tg CO�Riy�t18ir^v lfl SCB:u,c, i�lf�i;�i^ufC:icC i�'ioi c��fOXf�Tic"+_Si j�D.� Q:T'C:.?li O- ;h°peak�arking�emarci VJ�S Q°REi 2ISC7 t3V biSliOf j72i�{l;tg_ I l;iS S:llt'��I.^,CIUQ�C�liSitO(-,*Jci;ClilO O�JS@PlutlOCiS�rom 23 o�ce ��;ildings ii? �+Oii�tfi� .T;iuP'�i�� 811� a�,c::�OC^ ;,�3'rC C�Cii33'�J�ii�J�S. St�d�Si#esi';ea�3 Canada: Calaarv,AL{i9�8) t�nited Siates: Ney�pori 3cach; CA{i�70j; Ninseai�, !L{i974);Schiiler P�rk; IL(i97�): t72iias,iX ,1�70); Overland �ark; KS(;�78}; lnc�ian2poiis, �f� {i 979}; Conca;d: CA(�981}; D�nviii�: CA;?98 i); �ub{i�, CA;'[g8 i i; Housion,i X{i98 i j; La Plam?: CA(9°8�J, Laiaye��e, CA(1�8'!); N�penr;Ile> '•L(,�$'11; Orinda, CA. f9981); P�Im Beach: �i�1981); Rolli�g Meadotn�s, 1L �i9S1}; �an?amor, `'A(i98?);S�haumt�!�rg; �L (19$;);Skokie> iL{9 98 i);�J�Jatnut�r2sk; CA('i 98'i};Au;ora. CO ('!982}; 8811e�n.1g, +��in(,Gg2}; 3u�ingame, C?,(1982); GreenN�ood, CO{7982); Gcieia, CA{i982): Haus�o�:�X('1982): �lewoer Baacr, C1��1982); Phoenix,�Z(1982); San Anionio,TX(�9$2);San 1V3a�eo, CA('982); Saria 4na, CA (i 982); Schaumburg, !L(i982};Sea:ile, V�IA(1982);'vValnu�Cresk; CH (1982);Addison,iX (1�83); C�r!tury C�iy, C�(i 983); D211aS, TX(;983); Dem�er, CO(9 983); Foszer Ci��, CA(�983); H�us�on: i X{19$3); Neivpor't Beach, CA{9983}; t�hoenix,AZ(i983}; San �arnon, CA('t983);Aurorz, C� (1984); Sridge�ori, C i (998t); �rook, �lY(1984}; Ciark, NJ {1984);Dallas,TX (i�8�1: ;oster City, C�{'f984); Harrisburg, �A (1984); Livermorz, CA{'1984); A�iJiord, CT(198�j; �lo�r�afk; CT('19��); P�easanien: CA(198s;; Provc, U- ('198�); Rye Wii�on, C?(i98cj; San Ramon, CA(1°&4}: Scnaumburg, ?L(i98a);St2miord, CT f1a84): ��r�c�'sA, ",Y(��t j; l^.UUU LC7t1l7IV, GA(5 gg5 j; Uubiin; CA(1985}; i�iilpiias: CA('i 985); San Br�ro, C4 �'1985); fL('i38b);�lrmo�k, 1Y('i98�);Desrneld, 1L(1980^,; Bellnv�.��.WA(1987;: Dallas.TX{9987;; �n�ing,TX(1987); Kirkland;V+lA(1987);f�lorih Sy«cu�e, �!Y;1987); O:dahoma Citv, OK�i987); Dalias, TX('l989};Glenview, iL;'1990);�N21nu�Creek, Cf�,(1988};Anaheim; CA('t°a1); 3sflevu�: �/'�i.� (�°9 i); Sotnzil:1TJA(999'f j; �=�deral V�lay,t,VA('!99'1); Uiont!ak�Tnr-�ce, WA('19�i): �sdmo;�d.'JVA (i991): Ren�en, W,S(9993);Sea�ile: �NA (i 9°i)_ Snohor,�ish �o_, tn,rA(1991):�uicLVila.l,lA(�99'!); Lake Os�,��eg�. vR (i994j; Goieta> CA(199�); �fValnut Cresk, C�l('l990); Cie�reland. CY, (9598;; G�l�fa, CA f��98j: Gole�a, CA{1999);Saratooa, CA (20v^0i: Sani� Baroara; C�(2p01) � ,,,`� a. w . - — -- �'`y;�.,< _��y�pa ' Dot-mtov�n Fortta,no Older 2nc NJ�oric�uilainr r'�2r',c;n�Det�:ar,d S•uC;�. �c�.Ja„d De�eiopren��ommiss€en, n�• �KS rlsseciafes_June i992,oag��-?3{note�p2rking;aiie e�..3 spaces ner 100�se.�.GFi�.); �a;;lan,d�ent.-a1 - �" "" Dist�c%Dsvelopmsni Program--Tsc.h rbiemo=2:?2rkinc Analysis ar,d Reco,nmerded��ricina Plan.Ci;y o:Oaklar�c. �Y � ' yi by DKS Associ�ias.OL:obsr 198�,page 9 lemce car'r,ing,�ao�arge o;i.i i co i.49 vehicf�siKS=); lsvir,son, �:�rber: �_- <r- ; �Rober�Wearr_P2�cing_Eno �=ovneaticn. 1��0,T2bis 6-3:page 1C��estimai�s�angss i�C5D parki:?g-2=ios:rr;i- p_�t�,� , $ , vary�g�;ansi'usage:22-2.8 so�ces p�r 1�JCG�La fer 2G ae.*cen::,ansi:. ^:.6-2�spac�s p?�iOCG G!.ia fer�C "- ' , ' aercent�;ansit and 1_�J--?.1 scac�s�er 1�JQ0 Gi�rer60 perceni�:�^si�);�iolws�>>o�~,G1=n. C��P�r,'King Pal,�c�: ' ° . 7�velepmen!Polic,i orPar.king Policy.2009 !TL Anrn,�a!1,•teeii„g.Aug:.�si 200i.o�ge i 1 ;`r�eir.s��rae C�A��s;r�?:a^ i " � : �B7s o�3_G io 2.�spaCBS DBf i i3D sq.rr.or�.93 io {_�6 sp�c�s�ar i C�0 c.�;. � _ ' 1 . � C�"�� ,I� - j�c;P2fi(1rG CIiI.�t 2tior StudL in 5eaie;e.K!i�Q CCii;lit�.'i2ii�J,JJ�E !JJL.HF�°i;�!X''�,Z'_ Y,. -..._ ..�--••_,� � _�..,-.--5 r�+•_- �;r:__r5 '1!� _ �. ,. -_- Crandall, Ellen From: Mike Cheezem [mcheezem@jmcdev.comJ Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2012 2:16 PM To: Crandall, Ellen Subject: Proposed Nightclub at 516-524 Mandalay Ave Dear Elien, I appreciated talking with you this morning about the proposal to put a nightclub next to the Sandpearl Resort. Please note that the ownership and management groups of the resort strongly object to this proposed project In this location. In partnership with the city, we have worked exceptionally hard to create a family friendly, elegant, Inspired, quiet, and upscale resort that is attracting visitors from all over the country and abroad to the Clearwater Area. To put a bar/nightclub adjacent to our front door and within close proximity to the windows and balconies of Guest rooms would create a nuisance and be a detriment to the experience of our guests. We respectfully request that staff not recommend approval of this request but if staff does recommend approval We would like to speak at the hearing. Sincerely, Michael Cheezem Sandpeariy Resort, LLC i . I I lLv r►V � 524 MANDALAY AVE Date Received: 12/29/20114:00:20 PM Cork-n-Brew Bistro & Moneylink ZONING DISTRICT: Tourist LAND USE: Resort Facilities High (30 du/acre) ATLAS PAGE: 258A PLANNER OF RECORD: ESC PLANNER: Ellen Crandall, Planner II LL O � } P"¢� .��.. �� . ,.,, .... �� U To: Community Development Board Members From: Ellen Crandall,Planner II Date: March 20, 2012 RE: FLD2011-12046, 516-524 Mandalay The applicant has requested the following revised conditions based upon discussions with objecting neighbors and their representatives. Staff is in agreement with the revised conditions. If you have any questions,please contact me at 562-4836. Conditions of Approval: 5. That the final design and color of the restaurant building be consistent with the elevations approved by the CDB and anv increase in the number of seats outdoors in the plan attached 4 +1.' n.+.�l:nn+inn al�nll rnni�iru ili� Knnrnvu� �^.f��:� �'�.�"'..."'ii'.:ni��Tl�:�.°�.��i °11'.�R.^�.°.i�. bV iui�i Q�JN111.N�1V11 aaasaai a vy ia�. NNa v• t � 13 Any deletion, modification or amendment to these conditions shall require the approval of the Community Development Board. . �_.-+ r '(�{.�t� � 524 MANDALAY AVE Date Received: 12/29/20114:00:20 PM Cork-n-Brew Bistro & Moneylink ZONING DISTRICT: Tourist LAND USE: Resort Facilities High (30 du/acre) ATLAS PAGE: 258A PLANNER OF RECORD: ESC PLANNER: Ellen Crandall, Planner II . � ' a�c -('..� �oQ 1�' �e r=C', c c.�m ) � �c-4 3 c - 6 r ► Z �G��v►,�, 1,�e.� ( �vvr , o�-w' �! � q 2 7 PJ�vt�'�Z �jK��1�:�'� G✓'C�2 , c.t,�� :L_.�. 7 4 i �cv� N�cv�2 o C f1 �4 ��rf ; Ca w'►-�e�}'' � �� ; J cc,H�y��.�ti+"� /�.�:�cr� ��i� � / �,r/ ' ,�,�e.� 3 C! O /'r C�l/Yt ty��? 'J ��- 3� 7 � 2 O 1 �- j--j; M �c,�i�-�- � l�oS�'t��.r� � � � � ��i��c:e, �y. �;� P��-f�o s c�.. c;� f, v� h.�cer`L�c�{. c.c � v,.c ;e� � � �J �,� � n�� ,�. :: �n v+.��t',(��zc �, r�'�� r� E -�Z � � vl�t�►i d- �� cvu,v7 p�G(.,�� '�'r,�" ,� � ,( c, �"� Gvvt G i�✓YL��i/ !'/,/ � / `J (,�-.e��c,t�—tnfc:,vc�r'' ,�e�--�� ; �a�e r:� ��"�L�-w�- v�'��`�'r ��-v �jj' ei�v�C� l�it2c� ��C'1YLC� 01=' �� -�"G � ��e ��. ,�r ��- � � �/ , � �ct,v Lv�'.�-,T� �.c�c-Ch'L i s �2�-1'�Gc�¢.��(i[c' ,/t..G�P ,� G .o scc.� � . w rr��-.� .��'� �" `�( d�� aGe t�.ec�;��.�t c� ��„ �r►��w-�� . l �Zx>�- 'y��R'"�, �,,�,ec.� �,��.�-�'��. �� '� �.� � .,� k �e�(' ! i �'C'� --��- w��;� .� �� ',��-��-�. � ;'�� c,�G'� +�" S i�w�c c-C�' �, ,t?c,t�k � ��e, ��ev-t�.h�w� u��h c��- o�C c �a�i -� U�rrc,�-r�e .� e�rn � ��s��e��' �q k� � ��- l�l/�. p � � i 1/�/'�,�� 'fi+�+�1 -�C��-V �i z' ��'L{' " t� L�" � �il /�'1�"�-�— Vi:`d L.c'w CG�� e� ,�fit�G�,f'�n � � � Received �-�� -�:u- .� � MAR 1 2 2012 . �lanning&Development Crandall, Eilen From: dan le[dan.le3001@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2012 12:38 AM To: Crandall, Ellen Subject: Re: Re letter regarding proposed nightclub at 516-524 Mandalay Avenue Hi Ellen, Thank you very much for following up with me on this. My view is that Clearwater beach has its own uniqueness. It's not too quiet like Siesta Key but not too commercialized like Miami. It has something that attracts lots of people especially families with children including us. I would think that building more restaurants,movie theaters, more of family entertainments, children show, coffee shop,bakery shop, etc. something for families to do at night and day would be more beneficial, especially where it is next to the beach and several private condos. People who own condo there and those come to the beach to enjoy something that they cannot find in the city and would love to have quiet environment to relax and recharge. If the city still think there is a need for those sort of night clubs, we can do some pilot program in somewhere a little further into land and see how it goes. I think the city knows that the beach is their valuable asset so any developments there should be reviewed very carefully. It's good that we don't allow liquor. However,beer and wine can make people change the mood and do crazy things when their mind not clear enough. It's just the matter of how much they take in to come to that stage. Kind Regards, Dan Le (owner of#868, Sandpearl resort) On Mon, Mar 19,2012 at 5:45 AM,<E11en.Crandall(a�myclearwater.com> wrote: Good morning, I received your letter strongly objecting to the proposed nightclub at 516-524 Mandalay Avenue. Your letter will be part of the case file, and as this case has written statements of objection it will be presented at the Community Development Board Meeting March 20�. I am the case planner and can address any questions you have regarding the proposal. The Community Development Code (CDC) defines a nightclub as any establishment that serves alcohol that is not a restaurant. This proposal is a small bar focusing on craft beers and wine with some small food plates. They will not, and are not permitted to have liquor. This limitation and a few others are addressed in the Conditions of Approval (please see below). Nightclub is a permitted use in the Tourist District and based on the particulars of the development Staff is supporting the proposal. Please be aware that the Conditions of Approval for this proposal will stay with the use even should it change vwners. I know a common concern with this development is that this one may seem all right but the next owner may want full liquor, or play music too loud. The Conditions of Approval will limit this owner and all subsequent owners to these regulations. To request a modification to the Conditions of Approval they would come through the Flexible Development application process. This is a 3 month review process, public notice will be given, and it will go to a public meeting for approval. 1 We are still in the process of modifying the Conditions of Approval, however the modification wiil be for addition conditions and not the removal of conditions. Please see the Conditions of Approval below (particularly #9-i l): Conditions of Approval: l. That a building permit be obtained for the parking lot, building fa�ade, and interior improvements. 2. That the parking lot, building fa�ade, and landscaping improvements be completed prior to issuance of a Business Tax Receipt; 3. That a Business Tax Receipt be obtained for the nightclub, and office establishments; 4. That an Outside Seating permit be obtained for the seating in the public right-of-way; 5. That the final design and color of the restaurant building be consistent with the elevations approved by the CDB; 6. That any new or existing mechanical equipment be screened from public rights-of-way and adjacent properties; 7. That the dumpster enclosure be constructed and painted to match the building; and 8. That the electrical equipment located on the outside of the building be painted the same color as the building; and 9. That this use (nightclub) be limited to this tenant space only, and that any desired relocation within this shopping center or enlargement of floor area shall require a new application for re-review by the CDB; 10. That on-premise consumption of alcoholic beverages be limited to beer and wine (2-COP); 11. That there shall be no amplified music or microphone usage outside; and. 12. That prior to the issuance of any building permits, the Fire Department may require the provision of a Water Study performed by a Fire Protection Engineer in order to ensure that an adequate water supply is available and to determine if any upgrades are required by the developer due to the impact of the project. The water supply must be able to support the needs of any required fire sprinkler, standpipe and/or fire pump. If a fire pump is required, then the water supply must be able to supply 150% of its rated capacity. Do not hesitate to contact me if you have any questions. li��s� �;�s��t�6�� 2 Planner II Citv of Clearwater ISA Certified Arborist LEEU Green Associate 3