The URL can be used to link to this page

FLD2008-08026ID i titer ~- Planning Department 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, Florida 33756 Telephone: 727- 562 -4567 Fax: 727 - 562 -4865 ❑ SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION ❑ SUBMIT 14 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION - Plans and application are required to be collated, stapled, and folded into sets ❑ SUBMIT FIRE PRELIMARY SITE PLAN: $200.00 ❑ SUBMIT APPLICATION FEE $ CASE #: 7U ado ? - D 20 RECEIVED BY (staff initials): DATE RECEIVED: ORIGIN IECEVED 2006 PLANKING DEWTMEW CITE' OF CLEAMAR * NOTE: 15 TOTAL SETS OF INFORMATION REQUIRED (APPLICATIONS PLUS SITE PLAN SETS) FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION (Revised 07/11/2008) — PLEASE. TYPE OR PRINT— A. APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4- 202.A) APPLICANT NAME: City of Clearwater MAILING ADDRESS: 100 South Myrtle Avenue, Clearwater, FL 33756 PHONE NUMBER: 727- 562 -4747 FAX NUMBER: 727 - 562 -4755 CELL NUMBER: EMAIL: PROPERTY OWNER(S): City of Clearwater List ALL owners on the deed AGENT NAME: Michael Quillen, PE, City Engineer MAILING ADDRESS: 100 South Myrtle Avenue, Clearwater, FL 33756 PHONE NUMBER: 727- 562 -4747 FAX NUMBER: 727 -562 -4755 CELL NUMBER: EMAIL: michael . quille B. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4- 202.A) PROJECT NAME: STREET ADDRESS PARCEL NUMBER(S): PARCEL SIZE (acres): LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Downtown Boat Slips PROJECT VALUATION: $ 12, 600, 000 210 Drew Street, Clearwater, FL 33756 16 -29- 1500000 -210 -0110; 15- 00000 - 210 - 0100; 15- 43956 - 000 -0010; 15- 76482- 002 -0010; 15- 20358- 001 -0040 23.96 PARCEL SIZE (square feet): 10, 436, 976 See Attachment PROPOSED USE(S): Marina DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST: Approval of commercial docks including a reduction to the side (north) Specifically identify the request setback from 136 feet to 19 feet, a reduction to the side (south) setback (include number of units or square footage of non - residential use and all from 136 feet to 8 feet and deviation from the width dimensional standard requested code deviations; e.g. reduction in required number of section 3 601.c.3.h.iii by 473 feet. parking spaces, specific use, etc.) C: \Documents and Settings\ derek.ferguson \Desktop\planning dept forms 0708\FleAble Development (FLD) 2008 07- 11.doc Page 1 of 7 F OES THIS .APPLICATION INVOLVE THE TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS (TDR), A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED PLANNED UNIT EVELOPMENT, OR A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED (CERTIFIED) SITE PLAN? YES— NO X (if yes, attach a copy of the applicable documents) C. PROOF OF OWNERSHIP: (Code Section 4- 202.A.5) ❑ SUBMIT A COPY OF THE TITLE INSURANCE POLICY, DEED TO THE PROPERTY OR SIGN AFFIDAVIT ATTESTING OWNERSHIP (see page 7) D. ❑ 1. WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 3- 913.A) Provide complete responses to the six (6) GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA — Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail: The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. Please Refer to Attachment 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. Please Refer to Attachment 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety or persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use. Please Refer to Attachment 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. Please Refer to Attachment 5. The proposed development is consistent with. the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. Please Refer to Attachment 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts, on adjacent properties. Please Refer to Attachment ®RIG1 15 2008 PLANNWiI IG DEPARThfipw CITY OF CL CADocuments and Settings\ derek.ferguson\Desktop\planning dept forms 0708 \Flexible Development (FLD) 2008 07- 11.doc Page 2 of 7 0 0 WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Flexibility Criteria) ❑ Provide complete responses to the applicable flexibility criteria for the specific Use as listed in each Zoning District to which the waiver is requested (use separate sheets as necessary) — Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail: E. STORMWATER PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteria Manual and 4- 202.A.21) ❑ A STORMWATER NARRATIVE MUST BE SUBMITTED WITH ALL APPLICATIONS. All applications that involve addition or modification of impervious surface, including buildings, must include a stormwater plan that demonstrates compliance with the City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteria manual. A reduction in impervious surface area does not qualify as an exemption to this requirement. ❑ If a plan is not required, the narrative shall provide an explanation as to why the site is exempt. ❑ At a minimum, the STORMWATER PLAN shall include the following; ❑ Existing topography extending 50 feet beyond all property lines; ❑ Proposed grading including finished floor elevations of all structures; ❑ All adjacent streets and municipal storm systems; ❑ Proposed stormwater detention /retention area including top of bank, toe of slope and outlet control structure; ❑ A narrative describing the proposed stormwater control plan including all calculations and data necessary to demonstrate compliance with the City manual. ❑ Proposed stormwater detention /retention area including top of bank, toe of slope and outlet control structure; ❑ Signature and seal of Florida Registered Professional Engineer on all plans and calculations. ❑ COPY OF PERMIT INQUIRY LETTER OR SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT (SWFWMD) PERMIT SUBMITTAL (SWFWMD approval is required prior to issuance of City Building Permit), if applicable ❑ ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF STORMWATER PLAN REQUIREMENTS (Applicant must initial one of the following): (FDEP permit exemption received for upland improvements) N/A Stormwater plan as noted above is included Stormwater plan is not required and explanation narrative is attached. At a minimum, a grading plan and finished floor N/A elevations shall be provided. CAUTION — IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A STORMWATER PLAN AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 562 -4750. F. SUPPLEMENTAL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 4- 202.A) ❑ SIGNED AND SEALED SURVEY (including legal description of property) — One original and 14 copies; ❑ TREE SURVEY (including existing trees on site and within 25' of the adjacent site, by species, size (DBH 4" or greater), and location, including drip lines and indicating trees to be removed) — please design around the existing trees; ❑ TREE INVENTORY; prepared by a "certified arborist ", of all trees 4" DBH or greater, reflecting size, canopy (drip lines) and condition of such trees;. ❑ LOCATION MAP OF THE PROPERTY; L3 PARKING DEMAND STUDY in conjunction with a request to make deviations to the parking standards (ie. Reduce number of spaces). Prior to the submittal of this application, the methodology of such study shall be approved by the Community Development Coordinator and shall be in accordance with accepted traffic engineering principles. The findings of the study will be used in determining whether or not deviations to the parking standards are approved; ❑ GRADING PLAN, as applicable; ORIGINAL UC&VED ❑ PRELIMINARY PLAT, as required (Note: Building permits will not be issued until evidence of recording a final plat is rovided); ❑ COPY OF RECORDED PLAT, as applicable; PLANNING DEMRTMENT CADocuments and Settings\ derek.ferguson \Desktop\planning dept forms 0708 \Flexible Page 3 of 7 • s I.G. SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4- 202.A) 101 it W' SITE PLAN with the following information (not to exceed 24"x 36 "): Index sheet referencing individual sheets included in package; North arrow; Engineering bar scale (minimum scale one inch equals 50 feet), and date prepared; All dimensions; Footprint and size of all EXISTING buildings and structures; Footprint and size of all PROPOSED buildings and structures; All required setbacks; All existing and proposed points of access; All required sight triangles; Identification of environmentally unique areas, such as watercourses, wetlands, tree masses, and specimen trees, including description and location of understory, ground cover vegetation and wildlife habitats, etc; Location of all public and private easements; Location of all street rights -of -way within and adjacent to the site; Location of existing public and private utilities, including fire hydrants, storm and sanitary sewer lines, manholes and lift stations, gas and water lines; All parking spaces, driveways, loading areas and vehicular use areas; Depiction by shading or crosshatching of all required parking lot interior landscaped areas; Location of all solid waste containers, recycling or trash handling areas and outside mechanical equipment and all required screening {per Section 3- 201(D)(i) and Index #701); Location of all landscape material; Location of all onsite and offsite storm -water management facilities; Location of all outdoor lighting fixtures; Location of all existing and proposed sidewalks; and Floor plan typicals of buildings for all Level Two approvals. A floor plan of each floor is required for any parking garage requiring a Level Two approval. SITE DATA TABLE for existing, required, and proposed development, in written /tabular form: Land area in square feet and acres; Number of EXISTING dwelling units; Number of PROPOSED dwelling units; Gross floor area devoted to each use; Parking spaces: total number, presented in tabular form with the number of required spaces; Total paved area, including all paved parking spaces & driveways, expressed in square feet & percentage of the paved vehicular area; Official records book and page numbers of all existing utility easement; Building and structure heights; Impermeable surface ratio (I.S.R.); and Floor area ratio (F.A.R.) for all nonresidential uses. REDUCED COLOR SITE PLAN to scale (81/2 X 11); EXISTING REQUIRED PROPOSED ❑ ' FOR DEVELOPMENTS OVER ONE ACRE, provide the following additional information on site plan: One -foot contours or spot elevations on site; Offsite elevations if required to evaluate the proposed stormwater management for the parcel; All open space areas; Location of all earth or water retaining walls and earth berms; Lot lines and building lines (dimensioned); _ Streets and drives (dimensioned); _ Building and structural setbacks (dimensioned); Structural overhangs; p p�A3 1 u 2008 CITY OF CLUAWAU CADocuments and Settings\ derek.ferguson \Desktop\planning dept fors 0708 \Flexible Development (FLD) 2008 07- 11.doc Page 4 of 7 • . / H. LANDSCAPING PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4- 1102.A) ❑ LANDSCAPE PLAN with the following information (not to exceed 24" x 36 "): All existing and proposed structures; Names of abutting streets; Drainage and retention areas including swales, side slopes and bottom elevations; Delineation and dimensions of all required perimeter landscape buffers; Sight visibility triangles; Delineation and dimensions of all parking areas including landscaping islands and curbing; Existing trees on -site and immediately adjacent to the site, by species, size and locations, including driplines (as indicated on required tree survey); Location, size, and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, indicated by a key relating to the plant _ schedule; Plant schedule with a key (symbol or label) indicating the size, description, specifications, quantities, and spacing requirements of all existing and proposed landscape materials, including botanical and common names; Typical planting details for trees, palms, shrubs and ground cover plants including instructions, soil mixes, backfilling, mulching and protective measures; Interior landscaping areas hatched and /or shaded and labeled and interior landscape coverage, expressing in both square feet and percentage covered; Conditions of a previous development approval (e.g. conditions imposed by the Community Development Board); Irrigation notes. ❑ REDUCED COLOR LANDSCAPE PLAN to scale (8' /z X 11); ❑ COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM application, as applicable. Landscape associated with the Comprehensive Landscape Program shall exceed minimum Code requirements to offset the areas where minimum Code will not be met. I. BUILDING ELEVATION PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4- 202.A.23) ❑ BUILDING ELEVATION DRAWINGS — with the following information; 1 All sides of all buildings; Dimensioned; Colors (provide one full sized set of colored elevations); Materials; ® REDUCED BUILDING ELEVATIONS — same as above to scale on 8'% X 11. J. SIGNAGE: (Division 19. SIGNS / Section 3 -1806) ❑ All EXISTING freestanding and attached signs; Provide photographs and dimensions (area, height, etc.), indicate whether they will be removed or to remain. ❑ All PROPOSED freestanding and attached signs; Provide details including location, size, height, colors, materials and drawing; freestanding signs shall include the street address (numerals) ❑ Comprehensive Sign Program application, as applicable (separate application and fee required). ❑ Reduced si na a proposal ( 8% X 11 ) (color), If submitting Comprehensive Sign Program application. ORIGIN& 1ECVED 2000 C17Y OF C'T VA"U C: \Documents and Settings\ derek.ferguson \Desktop\planning dept forms 0708\Flexible Development (FLD) 2008 07- 11.doc Page 5 of 7 • i I.K. TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY: (Section 4- 202.A.13 and 4- 801.C) 0 Include if required by the Traffic Operations Manager or his /her designee or if the proposed development: ■ Will degrade the acceptable level of service for any roadway as adopted in the Comprehensive Plan. ■ Will generate 100 or more new vehicle directional trips per hour and /or 1000 or more new vehicle trips per day. ■ Will affect a nearby roadway segment and /or intersection with five (5) reportable accidents within the prior twelve (12) month period or that is on the City's annual list of most hazardous intersections. Trip generation shall be based on the most recent edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineer's (ITE) Trip General Manual. The Traffic Impact Study must be prepared in accordance with a "Scoping Meeting" held with the Traffic Operations Manager and the Planning Department's Development Review Manager or their designee (727- 562 -4750) Refer to Section 4 -801 C of the Community Development Code for exceptions to this requirement. Acknowledgement of traffic impact study requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following): Traffic Impact Study is included. The study must include a summary table of pre- and post - development levels of service for all roadway legs and each turning movement at all intersections identified in the Scoping Meeting. Traffic Impact Study is not required. CAUTION — IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 562 4750. L. FIRE FLOW CALCULATIONS/ WATER STUDY: Provide Fire Flow Calculations. Water Study by a FIRE PROTECTION ENGINEER to assure an adequate water supply is available and to determine if any upgrades are required by the developer due to the impact of this project. The water supply must be able to support the needs of any required fire sprinkler, standpipe and /or fire pump. If a fire pump is required the water supply must be able to supply 150% of its rated capacity. Compliance with the 2004 Florida Fire Prevention Code to include NFPA 13, MFPA 14, NFPA 20, NFPA 291, and MFPA 1142 (Annex H) is required. L3 Acknowledgement of fire flow calculations /water study requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following): Fire Flow Calculations/Water Study is included. Fire Flow Calculations/Water Study is not required. CAUTION — IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A FIRE FLOW CALCULATIONS/ WATER STUDY AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Fire Prevention Department at (727) 562 -4334. M. SIGNATURE: I, the undersigned, acknowledge that all representations made in this application are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge and authorize City representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application. Signature of property owner or representative STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS Sworn to and subscribed before me this day of A.D. 20 to me and /or by , who is personally known has produced as identification. Notary public, My commission expires: I*CZVE[Z I CADocuments and Settings\ derek.ferguson \Desktop\planning dept forms 0708 \Flexible Development (FLpomms ® `q MENT Page 6 of 7 io CITY -OF OLLkRWA, ER I'V •'b6 5�}.D K. TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY: (Section 4- 202.A.13 and 4- 801.C) "'- ` 2008 Include if required by the Traffic Operations Manager or his /her designee or if the proposed development: 1.>, '"- x' ='"�£ �f�.•�,r;, a. • Will degrade the acceptable level of service for any roadway as adopted in the Comprehensive Plan. ■ Will generate 100 or more new vehicle directional trips per hour and /or 1000 or more new vehicle trips per day. ■ Will affect a nearby roadway segment and /or intersection with five (5) reportable accidents within the prior twelve (12) month period or that is on the City's annual list of most hazardous intersections. Trip generation shall be based on the most recent edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineer's (ITE) Trip General Manual. The Traffic Impact Study must be prepared in accordance with a " Scoping Meeting" held with the Traffic Operations Manager and the Planning Department's Development Review Manager or their designee (727- 562 -4750) Refer to Section 4 -801 C of the Community Development Code for exceptions to this requirement. Acknowledgement of traffic impact study requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following): Traffic Impact Study is included. The study must include a summary table of pre- and post- development levels of service for all _ roadway legs and each turning movement at all intersections identified in the Scoping Meeting. /}��_ ' Traffic Impact Study is not required. r,r AUTION — IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 562- 4750. FIRE FLOW CALCULATIONS/ WATER STUDY: Provide Fire Flow Calculations. Water Study by a FIRE PROTECTION ENGINEER to assure an adequate water supply is available and to determine if any upgrades are required by the developer due to the impact of this project. The water supply must be able to support the needs of any required fire sprinkler, standpipe and /or fire pump. If a fire pump is required the water supply must be able to supply 150% of its rated capacity. Compliance with the 2004 Florida Fire Prevention Code to include NFPA 13, MFPA 14, NFPA 20, NFPA 291, and MFPA 1142 (Annex H) is required. Acknowledgement of fire flow calculations /water study requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following): Fire Flow CalculationsNVater Study is included. Fire Flow Calculations/Water Study is not required. CAUTION — IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A FIRE FLOW ALCULATIONS/ WATER STUDY AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE SUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Fire Prevention Department at (727) 562 -4334. M. SIGNATURE: I, the undersigned, acknowledge that all representations made STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS in this application are true and accurate to the best of my Sworn to nd subscribed before me this *Z-7 day of knowledge and authorize City representatives to visit and TV ',1 A.D. 20_ to me and /or by photograph the property described in this application. �L44iV_t_ Mcf-f Lh o Is perso a y no as produced as identification. ...._ .............. ....... ......... ...... ................... ........ - .. ................. _.__ ....... ........ ......._.... ..._.................. _......... _... ._.. ....... ........ .....__. Signature of property owner or representative Notary public, My commission expires: Fr JR R; MY COMMISSION # DD 44770 ' EXPIRES: November 3, 2009 CADocuments and Settings \ed.chesney \Local Settings \Temporary Internet Files \01LK3 \Flexible Development ( D`f 11 ThNN*vyPtbkUnder*1 to Page 6 of 7 M N. AFFIDAVIT TO AUTHORIZE AGENT: 1. Provide names of all property owners on deed — PRINT full names: City of Clearwater 2. That (I am /we are) the owner(s) and record title holder(s) of the following described property (address or general location): 210 Drew Street Clearwater, FL. 33756 3. That this property constitutes the property for which a request for a: (describe request) Downtown Boat Slips 4. That the undersigned (has /have) appointed and (does /do) appoint: W.adesr-im as (his /their) agent(s) to execute any petitions or other documents necessary to affect such petition; 5. That this affidavit has been executed to induce the City of Clearwater, Florida to consider and act on the above described property; 6. That site visits to the property are necessary by City representatives in order to process this application and the owner authorizes City representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application; 7. That (I��e hority, herebNcertify that the foregoing is true and correct. Prope weer Property Owner Property Owner Property Owner STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS C Before the undersigned, an officer duly commissioned by the laws of the State of Florida, on this / J day of Lme SPT , r personally appeared , KL OLA j t 2 {7 who having been first duly sworn Deposes and says that he /she fully understands the contents of the affidavit that he /she signed. �w�rrrrr " °F "'••,, EDWARD CHESNEY, JR. MY COMMISSION fi DD 447102 EXPIRES: November 3, 2009 '' Baided 7hnt NoWy Pubic Underwfts Notary Public Si na re Notary Seal /Stamp My Commission Expires: N .. `3?iO.9 ORIGINAL REC I) _I� ! 2000 C:\Documents and Settings\ derek.ferguson \Desktop\planning dept fortes 0708 \Fle )dble StandardO v I e t (FLQ 2008 07- 11.doc�p �o Page 7 of 7 pJ G TMENT CITY OF C MVA11Z Flexible Development Application Clearwater Downtown Boat Slips & Upland Improvements Prepared By: City of Clearwater 100 S. Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, FL 33756 727 - 562 -4747 September 12, 2008 ORIGIN& RL -cEWED S,EP 15 2000 PMNNG D5MRTMENT CITY OF C r-AIWA�R Table of Contents 1. Flexible Development Application Form 2. Project Description 3. Compliance with Downtown (D) District (Section 2- 903.1-1) 4. Compliance with Section 3 -601. Docks (3, a-g) 5. Compliance with Section 3-603. Marinas and Marina Facilities 6. Project Drawings /Graphic Renderings • Boat Slips • Restroom/Lau nd ry/Dockm aster Building • Upland Improvements ORIG `QED SEP 15 2000 IP.LANNNG DiffiRTMENT CITTOF CLEAT 4, f W ¢ w y i 0.89 Acres O Z ........ DREW .•' .. .... ..............................ti Clearwater r� r''•• Harbor a 14.19 Acres ¢ _= ° N : G W - Q MF M 4S BR,DC F .N i'..rn........ ................ .. ............... ................ r ••••t - CLEVELAND .•n . ................................ 35 Acres = ; ............................. 7.53 Acres e ; ¢ �... .. . ..r L ••1. ••1 1 ........................... .. ............................f PIERCE ST ¢ O J � g Y O 0 ?reoered c., =_ngineering Departmarn. 'neogreonic 'eohnolog} Dlvisror i Myrtle Ave, C,ea -ater. r. w-SF '=T562 -470:. ax " 7152 -EF ST iAURA ST S7 a S O Z 0 a i Acreage for selected City Owned Properties in the Downtown Area. Le Q Is nC� am-e! Lines Tip! i 4 e. 7 6 G7.o w. 2968 T I6- 29s -'.5e ^t)t w • ORIGIM RECSVED S!-- ' 1 1=) 2000 PLANNING DERARTIM CITY OF CLEk�tFdl� "-R a • Legal for Downtown Boat Slips That portion of City owned land bounded on the North by the North line of the NE % of Section 16- 29 -16; Bounded on the South by the south right -of -way line of Pierce Street; Bounded on the West by the waters of Clearwater Harbor; Bounded on the East by the West rights -of -way lines of Pierce Boulevard and Drew Street. Together with that portion lying in the 1200 foot right -of -way of Memorial Causeway (State Road 60) lying East of a line 109 feet Easterly of and parallel to the centerline of the Intracoastal Waterway channel. UJ Together with M &B parcel 21/011. 0 Together with the land described in the Internal Improvement Fund (IIF) deeds 17496, 17500, and 17512 lying East of said line 109 Easterly of and parallel to the centerline of the Intracoastal Waterway channel. Together with that portion of City owned land bounded on the North by a line 300 feet North of and parallel to the North right -of -way line of Pierce Street; Bounded on the South by the North right -of -way line of Pierce Street; Bounded on the West by the East right -of -way line of Pierce Boulevard; Bounded on the East by a line 415 feet West of and parallel to the West right -of -way line of Osceola Avenue. City of Clearwater Land Ownership During the preparation of the initial boat slips feasibility study in 2006, a review of past and present deeds and title documents was conducted to determine whether existing bottom lands upon which the proposed boat slips will be build are owned by the City. With the exception of the Island View Condominium project (former Calvary Baptist Church property), the City of Clearwater owns all of the lands lying between Drew Street on the north, Pierce Avenue on the South, Osceola Avenue on the east and a 1200 foot wide (i.e. 700 feet south and 500 feet north of the original Memorial Causeway Bridge) strip of land between the mainland and Clearwater Beach. There is a small area of bottomlands on the north end of the proposed boat slip project that is outside of these City owned lands. The City will need to secure a submerged land lease from the State of Florida for this submerged parcel as part of the permitting process subsequent to City approval of the project. The specific boundary of this submerged parcel will be determined and legally described during the FDEP permitting process. .It c c c� w Cn PLANNING DEPARTMENT � t CITY OF C LEARWAT E R POST OFFICE BOX 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758 -4748 MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562 -4865 October 29, 2008 Michael Quillen, PE City Engineer City of Clearwater 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, FL 33756 RE: Development Order - Case FLD2008 -08026 210 Drew Street Dear Mr. Quillen: This letter constitutes a Development Order pursuant to Section 4- 206.D.6 of the Community Development Code. On October 21, 2008, the Community Development Board reviewed your request for Flexible Development approval to permit a marina for 127 slips in the Downtown (D) District with a reduction to the side (north) setback from 135.7 to 19 feet, a reduction to the side (south) setback from 135.7 to 27 feet and an increase to the maximum width from 75% of the lot width (1,017.7 feet) to 109.8% of the lot width (1,490 feet), under the provisions of Sections 2- 903.H, 3- 601.C.3 and 3 -603. The Community Development Board (CDB) APPROVED the application with the following Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and Conditions of Approval: Findings of Fact: 1. That the 23.96 acres is located along the Downtown Clearwater Harbor between Drew Street (north) and Pierce Street (south). The overall site is currently developed with the Coachman Park, City Main Library, Harborview Center, Stein Mart and City Hall. The proposed marina will utilize and make improvements to those areas of the subject property adjacent to or in Clearwater Harbor; 2. That there currently exists a public fishing pier on the north side of the project that will remain and be expanded as part of the marina; 3. That on March 13, 2007, Clearwater voters approved a referendum providing for the construction of the proposed downtown boat slips for a maximum of 140 slips; 4. That the site has approximately 1,357 feet of waterfront frontage on Clearwater Harbor between the north and south property lines; 5. That the development proposal consists of the construction of a municipal marina consisting of a 127 -slip concrete floating dock system, with 41 slips in the North Basin and 86 slips in the South Basin; 6. That the design of the docks in both the North and South Basins accommodates maintenance vessels for the bridge and a minimum 30 -foot clearance around the bridge support columns and bases; 7. That on the outside (west side) of the docks in both the North and South Basins adjacent to the channel, as well as the south side of the dock in the North Basin adjacent to the new Memorial n October 29, 2008 Quillen — Page 2 Causeway Bridge, the docks accommodate the transient side tie of boats up to 25 feet in width and 100 feet in length or larger for persons traveling up and down the coast (staying for a few days or a week) or for boaters attending events or activities in Coachman Park or the downtown; 8. That boats moored at these transient side ties will be sufficiently set back from the centerline of the channel of the Intracoastal Waterway so as to not impact the safety or navigation of boats in the channel or at the side ties; 9. That the outside (west side) of the docks, as well as the ends of docks, is designed as wave attenuat6rs to reduce wave impacts on boats moored in the slips; 10. That the existing building on the north end at Drew Street will be renovated and expanded toward the south to provide for a harbor master's office., as well as providing restrooms, showers and laundry facilities for persons using the docks in the existing portion of the structure; 11. That based on a parking ratio of one parking space per two slips and 127 proposed slips, a total of 64 parking spaces are required for this marina; 12. That two existing parking lots that will be upgraded to provide parking for the marina. The northern parking lot will have 20 parking spaces, while the southern parking lot will have 46 parking spaces. An additional 59 on- street parking spaces along Cleveland Street and Drew Street proximate to the marina will also be upgraded as part of this project; 13. That there are no properties zoned residentially adjacent to the proposed dock (adjacent properties are zoned Downtown District); 14. That the proposed dock meets the required length criteria of the Code; 15. That the proposal includes a deviation to reduce the side (north) setback from 135.7 to 19 feet and to reduce the side (south) setback from 135.7 to 7.67 feet; 16. That the proposal includes a deviation to increase the maximum width from 75% of the lot width (1,017.7 feet) to 109.8% of the lot width (1,490 feet); 17. That water depths beneath the proposed boat slips range from approximately five feet to approximately 16 feet, providing more than the one -foot clearance distance between the bottom of the vessel and the bottom of the water body at mean low tide; and 18. That there are no outstanding Code Enforcement issues associated with the subject property. Conclusions of Law: 1. That on March 13, 2007, Clearwater voters approved a referendum providing for the construction of the proposed downtown boat slips for a maximum of 140 slips; 2. That the development proposal is consistent with the Flexibility criteria as per Section 2 -903.H of the Community. Development Code (Marinas); 3. That the development proposal is consistent with the commercial dock review criteria as per Section 3- 601.C.3 of the Community Development Code; 4. That the development proposal is consistent with the marina review criteria as per Section 3 -603 of the Community Development Code; and 5. That the development proposal is consistent with the General Applicability criteria as per Section 3- 913.A of the Community Development Code. Conditions of Approval: 1. That living aboard non - transient vessels be prohibited, except as may be allowed for private tenants under the Private Docking Permit; 2: That there be no fueling facilities at this marina; 3. That no private tenants conduct any commercial business from any slip at this marina; October 29, 2008 Quillen — Page 3 4. That ferry service may be permitted, with written prior permission from the City Manager or designee, to allow commercial vessels with a base operation in another location other than this marina to pick up and/or drop off customers at this marina; 5. That major servicing of vessels be prohibited, but permissible servicing of vessels be limited to routine maintenance and minor repairs necessary for the preservation and seaworthiness of the vessel, as determined by the Harbor Master; 6. That signage be permanently installed on the docks or at the entrance to the docks containing wording warning boaters of the existence of protected sea grasses and manatees in the vicinity; 7. That a copy of the SWFWMD and/or FDEP Permit and Corps of Engineer's Permit, if applicable, be submitted to the Planning Department prior to commencement of construction; and 8. That, prior to the issuance of any permit, compliance with all requirements of General Engineering, Traffic Engineering and Stormwater Engineering be met; and 9. That the Public Art and Design Impact Fee be due on this project, pending transfer of impact fee funds. Pursuant to Section 4-407, an application for a building permit or other approvals shall be made within one year of Flexible Development approval (October 21, 2009). All required certificates of occupancy shall be obtained within two years of the date of issuance of the initial building permit. The building permit must be obtained within six months of the initial permit application. This timeframe to obtain the initial building permit may be extended for an additional six months for cause by the Community Development Coordinator. Time frames do not change with successive owners. The Community Development Coordinator may grant an extension of time for the Flexible Development approval for a period not to exceed one year and only within the original period of validity. The issuance of this Development Order does not relieve you of the necessity to obtain any building permits or pay any impact fees that may be required. In order to facilitate the issuance of any permit or license affected by this approval, please bring a copy of this letter with you when applying for any permits or licenses that require this prior development approval. Additionally, an appeal of a Level Two approval (Flexible Development) may be initiated pursuant to Section 4 -502.13 by the applicant or by any person granted party status within 14 days of the date of the CDB meeting. The filing of an application/notice of appeal shall stay the effect of the decision pending the final determination of the case. The appeal period for your case expires on November 4, 2008 (14 days from the date of the CDB meeting). If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call Wayne M. Wells, Planner III, at 727 -562- 4504.' You can access zoning information for parcels within the City through our website: www.myclearwater.com/gov /depts /planning. 0 i cerely, hael Delk, AICP Planning Director S: (Planning DepartmentlC D BIFLEX (FLD) (Inactive or Finished ApplicationslDrew 0210 City Downtown Boat Docks.Marina (D) -Approved 10.08 - WWIDrew 0210 Development Order 10.29.08.doe FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION APPLICANT RESPONSES Section D. Written Submittal Requirements (Code Section 3 -19.A) 1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located: Comment: The boat slips have been designed to fit into the existing basin generally located between the Pierce 100 Condominiums and the existing City owned dock located at the end of Drew Street, north and south of the new Memorial Causeway Bridge and west of the existing channel. The marina project as proposed represents an appropriate addition to the waterfront and complements the downtown redevelopment plan and neighboring properties. The scale and coverage of the docks is appropriate for this location. No new structures are proposed on the landside portion of the project other than the renovation of the existing structure at the end of Drew Street. 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. Comment: The only properties directly abutting the proposed boat slips are the Pierce 100 Condominiums on the south and the City-owned Harborview Center and Coachman Park on the east, and Church of Scientology property on the north. The Pierce 100 Condominiums are fully developed. The location of the boat slips in proximity to this high rise structure will not discourage the redevelopment should it ever occur. The Harborview Center and Coachman Park will likely be improved as part of the City's ongoing downtown and waterfront redevelopment efforts with the boat slips enhancing this ongoing redevelopment program. The proposed boat slips are a key component of this redevelopment plan and provide enhanced recreational and pedestrian opportunities along the currently underutilized waterfront. 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use. Comment: This project is part of a comprehensive strategy to protect, preserve and promote public access and activity on Clearwater's waterways and waterfront. The boat slips and upland improvements will positively affect the downtown neighborhood by providing additional recreational and pedestrian opportunities for permanent residents and tourists visiting the area. Similarly, the project will improve the aesthetics of the currently underutilized waterfront. 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. The project has been designed to provide a convenient drop off area for boaters and sufficient city -owned parking already exists along the waterfront north and south of the Memorial Causeway Bridge to meet the project's parking demands ORIGINAL of one space per two boat slips. Additional overflow parking beyond this RECEIVED SEP 2 �; 2000 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER 0 � 0 requirement exists along the waterfront proximate to the project, if needed. The existing parking lots will be improved with new landscaping to comply with the current code and additional pedestrian ways will be provided. 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. Comment: The project represents a vital component of the Downtown Redevelopment Plan. The character of the immediate vicinity is changing positively with the ongoing redevelopment activities in the downtown. The project has been thoughtfully designed to complement these ongoing redevelopment activities. As a result, the community character of the -area will be clearly enhanced through this waterfront improvement project. 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts, on adjacent properties. Comment: The boat slips are proposed to be floating concrete structures which are typically the most aesthetic pleasing and easiest to maintain. The docks are being designed to maximize views of the waterfront at both the pedestrian and bluff levels. Pedestrian access and views of the waterfront will also be enhanced with the construction of the promenade located between the north and south basin overlooking the proposed boat slips (a separate but related project). Additional landscaping and community art will be provided on the adjacent uplands enhancing the visual impact of the current waterfront area. No adverse acoustical and olfactory impacts are anticipated. Hours of Operations for the Downtown Boat Slips; The Downtown Boat Slips will be staffed 24 hours a day, seven days a week. The staffing will consist of a Dock Master office staff manned by a Marine TFades Department personnel worker from 6:30 AM until 9 PM, and a Police Aide Security Guard from 9 PM until 6:30 AM the next morning. The Downtown Boat slips facility has several components which each will have unique operating hours. Those components are: - The public downtown fishing pier - The public docks (connecting the fishing pier to the main walkway on the north side of the Promenade) - The rented boat slips - The rented transient side tie moorings - The Dock Master office The Downtown Fishing Pier is currently closed. As part of the Downtown Boat slips, once construction is complete and the docks are expanded, it will be open 24 hours a day. The public docks. The public docks are a free to the public amenity that will be open from 8 AM until 10 PM to keep their hours in line with a recent city ordinance on public docks located in several locations throughout the city. ORIGINAL RECEIVED SEP 2 3 2008 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER Exceptions will be made for City special events such as Jazz Holiday and fishing tournaments held by other city departments. The Downtown Boat slips will be staffed 24 hours a day, seven days a week. The staffing will consist of a Dock Master office staff from 6:30 AM until 9 PM, and a Police Aide security guard from 9 PM until 6:30 AM the next morning. The rented boat slips will be accessible 24 hours a day by persons renting slips or transient boating guests renting transient mooring space. There will be gates restricting access to these dock areas from general public access during the hours of 9 PM and 6:30 AM. The transient side tie moorings will be accessible under the same hours and process as the rented boat slips. The Dock Master office will be open to the public from 6:30 AM to 6:30 PM and will be staffed with Marine Department personnel who can address both boat slip tenant concerns and the concerns of transient boaters. The facility manager will be onsite during those core hours. While the office staff will be at the facility until 9 PM, the hours from 6:30 PM until 9:00 PM will be for closing out paperwork, and providing security rounds of the facility. At 9 PM they transfer the shift over to the Police Aides for night security. The police aides make rounds from 9 PM until 6:30 AM at which time the Marine Department staff takes back over. Section E. Stormwater Plan Submittal Comment: The upland portion of the project has been determined to be exempt from FDEP stormwater requirements. A copy of the agency exemption letter is provided on the next page. ORIGINAL RECEIVED SEP 2 3 2000 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER CLEARWATER DOWNTOWN BOAT SLIPS AND UPLAND IMPROVEMENTS COMPLIANCE WITH DOWNTOWN DISTRICT (D) Section 2 -903.1-1 The proposed project furthers the intent and purpose of the Downtown District by providing additional opportunities for recreational boating in close proximity to the downtown, improved pedestrian facilities enabling residents and visitors to better utilize the waterfront, and enhances the aesthetics and appearance of the waterfront contributing to the redevelopment goals of the downtown area. The proposed project is located in the Downtown (D) District. Pursuant to Section 2- 903.H of the City's Land Development Code, "Marinas and marina facilities" require review and approval by the Community Development Board (CDB) as a Level 2 application. The code requires the applicant address specific flexibility criteria outlined in this section as follows: 1. The parcel proposed for development is not located in areas identified in the Comprehensive Plan as areas of environmental significance including: a. The north end of Clearwater Beach b. Clearwater Harbor grass beds; c. Cooper's Point; d. Clearwater Harbor spoil islands; e. Sand Key Park; f. The southern edge of Alligator Lake Comment: The proposed project is not located in any of the referenced areas with the exception of its proximity to Clearwater Harbor grass beds. The project has been consciously designed not to impact grass beds in the harbor. Project consultants have mapped existing sea grass beds along the entire waterfront area of the proposed project. The slips and docks, have been located in a manner to avoid any sea grasses. 2. No commercial activities other than the mooring of boats on a rental basis shall be permitted on any parcel of land which is contiguous to a parcel of land which is designated as residential in the Zoning Atlas, unless the marina facilities are totally screened from view from the contiguous land which is designated as residential and the hours of operation of the commercial activities are limited to the time period between sunrise and sunset. Comment: Properties located north and south of Cleveland Street in the downtown are designated Downtown (D) District. Consequently, there is no Q residentially zoned property contiguous to the project. 0 C= LU �> 3. The design of all buildings complies with the Downtown District design G guidelines in Division 5 of Article 3. ® so EE Comment: The existing structure located at the northern end of the project proposed as restrooms, laundry.facilities and Dock Masters office had fallen into Q. 0 0, disrepair is being renovated as part of this project and will be compliant with the referenced design guidelines. More specifically, the materials and colors employed in the renovation of this structure comply with the Downtown District. Please refer to the color elevations of the structure in Section 6 of this package. 4. All marina facilities shall comply with the commercial dock requirements set forth in Section 3- 601.C.3 and the marina and marina facilities requirements set forth in Section 3 -603. Comment: Please refer to Section 4 and 5 of this package which addresses compliance with these criteria. h Wf �, RJot, o o LL- uj �/� Vd z V CLEARWATER DOWNTOWN BOAT SLIPS COMPLIANCE WITH DIVISION 6 DOCK/MARINA STANDARDS SECTION 3 -601. DOCKS The proposed project requires City of Clearwater approval and Pinellas County Water and Navigation Control Authority permit. The City of Clearwater approval is processed as a Level Two (flexible development) approval. The proposed project is classified as a "Commercial dock" because it is being constructed and maintained by the City of Clearwater. As such, the project must address the criteria outlined in Section 3- 601.C.3.a -g as follows: a. Use and compatibility I.) The proposed dock shall be subordinate to and contribute to the comfort, convenience or necessities of the users or the occupants of the principal use of the property. Comment: The principal uses of the property abutting the proposed boat slips is a waterfront park (Coachman Park) and parking for the Harborview Center. The proposed project is one component of the City's Downtown Redevelopment Plan. As such it will contribute to the comfort and convenience to the residents of downtown and the City as a whole. The primary users of the facility will be the boaters who lease dock space, transient boaters visiting Clearwater, recreational boaters docking at the facility for activities in Coachman Park, and the general public visiting the waterfront area. ii.) The proposed dock shall be in harmony with the scale and character of adjacent properties and the neighborhood in general. Comment: Other than the small dock located at the Pierce 100 Condominium there are no docks in close proximity to the proposed project. The proposed project has been sensitively designed at an appropriate scale, character and intensity to compliment . neighborhood residential, commercial and recreational uses proximate to the site. It is important to note that this is a "municipal marina" project which is notably- different than small private docks. This project was approved by a city -wide referendum in 2007, and is envisioned as another catalytic contributing to the redevelopment of the downtown. The upscale design of the project and proposed roadway, parking, public art and landscaping will ensure the project is in harmony with the neighborhood. iii.) The proposed, dock shall be compatible with dock patterns in the general vicinity. 0 Comment: Other than the small dock serving the Pierce 100 Condominium, there are not docks in close proximity to the proposed project. oil LU ZLL O Q b. Impact on existing water recreation activities. The use of the proposed dock shall not adversely impact the health, safety or well being of persons currently using the adjacent waterways for recreational and /or commercial uses. Furthermore, it shall not hinder or discourage the existing uses of the adjacent waterway by uses including but not limited to non - motorized boats and motorized boats. Comment: At the present time the only boaters utilizing the basins north and south of the new Memorial Causeway Bridge are boaters who infrequently gather between the channel of the Intracoastal Waterway and the seawall adjacent to Coachman Park for 4th of July and /or other park activities. The channel is well marked and a slow speed minimum wake zone is in place, between Pierce 100 and the Seminole Launch Ramp, to maximize boater safety. City Staff and the consultant met with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers in early 2008, to establish a safe setback from the centerline of the channel of the Intracoastal Waterway. It was determined that vessels with widths up to 25 feet could dock along the outside wave attenuator docks along the existing channel in a safe manner. Three controlled access points into the boat slip basin are being provided. One from the southwest, one from the northeast and one from the west near the proposed promenade. The outside wave attenuators proposed for the boat slips will parallel the channel and will be available for transient vessels. The public dock depicted on the final slip layout plan is designed for docking of vessels coming to events at Coachman Park. c. Impacts on navigation. The existence and use of the proposed dock shall not have a detrimental effect on the use of adjacent waters for navigation, transportation, recreational or other public conveniences. Comment: The City's Harbormaster has determined the proposed dock will not adversely impact the health, safety or well being of the current users of adjacent waters. There is a slow speed minimum wake zone currently in effect from the Pierce 100 Condominium to the Seminole Launch Ramp which covers the entire boat slip project thereby minimizing the impact of the proposed facility on adjacent waters for navigation, transportation, and recreational boaters traversing the area west of the marina. Additionally, subsequent to City review and approval of this application, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and the Pinellas County Water and Navigation Control Authority will review the proposed project to ensure the project does not have cX detrimental effects on the use of adjacent waters for navigation. Discussions to ME < date between project team members and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers in aM � Jacksonville have been positive and a permit is anticipated. 0 LU a F-5 � C9 : ® ?5 LU z0 C) d. Impacts on marine environment i.) Docks shall be sited to ensure that boat access routes avoid injury to marine grassbeds or other aquatic resources in the surrounding areas. Comment: Underwater field studies were conducted in May 2006 in support of the proposed project. The studies were conducted to determine the presence and locations of the seagrass and notable benthic communities within the project area. Seagrasses were mapped and the docks located and designed to protect the grassbeds generally located adjacent to the existing seawall. (Please refer to the slip layout plan that depicts the location of the seagrasses.) Currently, these seagrasses are unprotected from boaters entering the area. The location of the pedestrian dock paralleling the seawall in the north basin and the additional docks paralleling the seawall at the southern end of the south basin will effectively protect these seagrasses from boaters who have historically entered these areas and damaged seagrasses during special events. ii.) Docks shall not have an adverse impact upon natural marine habitats, grass flats suitable as nursery feeding grounds for marine life, or established marine soil suitable for producing plant growth of a type useful as nursery or feeding grounds for marine life; manatee sanctuaries; natural reefs and any such artificial reef which has developed an associated flora and fauna which have been determined to be approaching a typical natural assemblage structure in both density and diversity; oyster beds; clam beds; known sea turtle nesting site; commercial or sport fisheries or shell fisheries areas; and habitats desirable as juvenile fish habitat. Comment: In addition to the response above, it is important to note that manatee records kept by the FFWCC Florida Wildlife Research Institute were reviewed during the preliminary design of the project. Records can be dated back to 1974. In the last 32 years, there have been two (2) confirmed water craft related manatee deaths within one (1) mile of the project site. Throughout all of Pinellas County, which includes Tampa Bay, there have been 28 water craft related deaths. While manatees frequent the area, it is not expected that the addition of slips will increase the threat. Notwithstanding, a manatee protection plan will be required as part of the state and /or federal permitting process. There is a band of barnacles growing on the seawall face as well as anthropogenic debris found along the seawall and underneath the Drew Street fishing pier. The oyster clusters have colonized but have aged to the point of being indistinguishable from a naturally developed population. The proposed boat slips will not adversely impact the noted marine resources. 3 0 LU C= Cl- LL LU 'f-, r� • e. Impacts on water quality i) All turning basin, access channels, boat mooring areas and any other area associated with a dock shall have adequate circulation and existing water depths to ensure that a minimum of one foot clearance is provided between the lowest member of a vessel (e.g. skegs, rudder, prop) and the bottom of the waterbody at mean or ordinary low water ( -0.95 NGVD datum). Comment: Water quality data were collected in April 2006 by the City's consultant team. Surface water samples were collected at four stations, surface and bottom for the deeper sites and surface for shallow sites and analyzed for fecal coliforms, metals, salinity, dissolved oxygen , turbidity, Nitrate, Nitrite, Nitrogen and Orthophosphate.. Salinity, turbidity and dissolved oxygen were analyzed by Delta Seven, Inc. field ecologists. The site meets the state standards for levels of fecal coliform and metals with the exception of copper. Copper values exceeded state standards at one location. Data obtained from the Environmental Protection Commission of Hillsborough County (EPCHC) indicated that high values are not uncommon and'copper appears to be elevated throughout the system. Water quality impacts will also be evaluated during the forthcoming permitting of the project by FDEP and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. A bathymetric survey was conducted for the site (see copy of survey in this package). This is a plan view drawing showing sounding data and contours at 1 foot intervals. The maximum depth within.the study area is approximately 16.9 feet at the edge of the Intracoastal Waterway and a minimum depth is approximately 0.1 feet at the seawall. The depth beneath the proposed boat slips ranges from approximately 5 feet to approximately 16 feet. The water depth under Dock D (the dock located in the shallowest water) is 4.9 feet at mean low tide, which provides for more than one foot clearance distance between the bottom of the vessel and the bottom of the waterbody at mean low. It is envisioned that these slips will accommodate the smallest vessels with the least draft. This depth is sufficient to accommodate vessels envisioned to utilize the marina without adversely impacting bottomlands. ii) The dock shall not effectively cause erosion, extraordinary storm drainage, shoaling of channels, or adversely affect the water 2 quality presently existing in the area or limit progress that is being made toward improvement of water quality in the area in which the dock is proposed to be located. �# Comment: The docks as designed will not cause erosion to bottomlands by vessels utilizing the facility. Conversely, the project will afford a higher level of protection than currently exists in the areas Z n: LU U C= o r^1 / h C/3 C3 below 5 feet due to the proposed docks paralleling the existing seawall westerly of the existing grass beds. The City will be seeking a Florida Clean Marina designation which is a voluntary non - regulated designation for the facility which is a program that acknowledges and rewards environmentally conscious marina facilities. Administered by FDEP, the marina must meet select criteria including compliance with environmental regulations and submerged land lease, and utilize Best Management Practices determined from a self- assessment checklist and designated review. Other factors involved in the Clean Marina program include an available resource person at the marina to provide customers with environmental information, adequate and well managed trash /garbage and recycling containers, posting for viewing, or otherwise publishing, a set of environmental policies used by the marina, water and land of the marina clean without signs of oil, sewage or litter, sewerage pump -out facilities located in the marina. f. Impacts on natural resources. i) The dock shall not have a material adverse impact upon the conservation of wildlife, marine life, and other natural resources, including beaches and shores, so as to be contrary to the public interest. Comment: As noted in the previous responses above, the proposed project must meet additional county, state and federal approval and permitting requirements (subsequent to City approval) ensuring no material adverse impacts upon wildlife, marine life, and other natural resources. Studies and evaluations of the proposed facility as presented in the July 2006 Clearwater Downtown Boat Slips Study, prepared by Wade Trim, inc., indicate there are no adverse impacts identified at this juncture in the design process. There are no beaches proximate to the site and additional protection to the existing seawalls is anticipated as part of the project design. ii) The dock shall not have an adverse impact on vegetated areas; vegetative, terrestrial, or aquatic habitats critical to the support of listed species providing one or more of the requirements to sustain their existence, such as range, nesting or feeding grounds; habitats which display biological or physical attributes which would serve to make them rare within the confines of the city; designated preservation areas such as those identified in aU the comprehensive land use plan, national wildlife refuges, Florida outstanding waters or other designated preservation f@ bird CS areas, and sanctuaries, Comment: The project as designed will not impact existing W 0 c]_ J seagrasses or ichthyofaunal and elasmofaunal species that might be 0 present in the area. A manatee protection plan will be required as ; part of the subsequent state and federal permitting processes. The waters of Clearwater Harbor are designated as Outstanding Florida Waters. The layout of the slips, docks and pedestrian walkways, proposed Clean Marina designation and compliance with county, state and federal permitting requirements serve to ensure the proposed facility will not have impacts on habitats noted above. g. Impacts on wetlands habitat/uplands. The dock shall not have a material adverse affect upon the uplands surrounding. Comment: As previously noted, the proposed project will not impact existing wetland habitats. There are no upland habitats of significance impacted by the project. Conversely, the project will improve the uplands adjacent to the boat slips by providing additional landscaping. Upland improvements include sloping the existing sidewalks along the seawall to drain toward upland landscape areas. Currently this area is constructed without regard to preventing overland flow towards the seawall. h. Dimensional standards. i) Setbacks. All commercial and multi -use docks shall be located so that no portion of such dock is closer to any property line as extended into water than ten percent of the applicant's property width measured at the waterfront property line. Multi -use private and commercial docks abutting adjacent waterfront single - family or two- family property must be setback a minimum of one -third of the applicant's waterfront property width from the adjacent waterfront single - family or two- family property. Comment: The property line extends 1,357 feet along the existing seawall between the property line on the north and the property line adjacent to the Pierce 100 condominium on the south. A 10% setback from the northerly property line would be 136 feet. As currently designed (but not permitted), the proposed boat slips would be 19.0 feet from the north property line, hence a deviation from the code of 117 feet is being requested. A 10% setback from the southerly property line would also be 136 feet. As currently designed, the proposed boat slips would be 7 feet 8 inches from the southerly property line, hence a deviation of 128 feet 4 inches through this Flexible Development Application. It is important to note that final permitting of the boat slips by county, state and federal agencies could alter these setbacks as currently identified. ii) Length. The length of commercial and multi -use docks shall no,� extend from the mean high water line or seawall of the C= applicant's property more than 75 percent of the width of the 2 C= applicant's property measured at the waterfront property line. Tie poles may extend beyond the dock provided such poles do not extend 25 percent of the width of the waterway and do not constitute a navigational hazard. Comment: The boat slips as proposed extend approximately 685 feet from the seawall to the outside edge of the westerly attenuator docks at the deepest point of the project. Seventy -five percent (75 %) of the width of the property is 1017 feet. Consequently the proposed boat slips comply with this standard. The length of the docks is restricted by the channel of the Intracoastal Waterway. iii) Width. The width of commercial and multi -use docking facilities shall not exceed 75 percent of the width of the applicant's property measured at the waterfront property line. Comment: As depicted on the enclosed final slip layout plan, the width of the docking facility is 1,490 at its widest point from the northerly point of the fishing pier to the most southerly dock paralleling the channel. The width of the property is 1,357 feet generally at the seawall. Seventy five percent of the width of the property is 1,017 feet. Therefore, the docking facility exceeds this standard by 473 feet. Because of the irregular shape of the parcel (1,490 feet along the channel and 1,357 feet along the seawall) the boat slips are wider along the channel than along the seawall (property line). Additionally, it is important to note that no boat slips can be constructed under the Memorial Causeway Bridge as required by FDOT. Consequently the boat slips have been designed in two completely separate basins north and south of the Memorial Causeway Bridge which is approximately 112 feet wide at the boat slip site. Given these site constraints, a request to deviate from this standard is appropriate. iv) Covered boatlifts. Covered boatlifts are permitted provided a permanent and solid roof deck is constructed with material such as asphalt shingles, metal tile or wood. Canvas and canvas like roof materials are prohibited. Vertical sidewalls are prohibited on any boatlift or dock. Comment: No covered boatlifts are proposed as part of this project. V) Deviations. Deviations from the requirements of this section may be considered and approved by the community development board in order to comply with the review criteria established in sections 3- 601(C)(3)(a) -(g). . Comment: A deviation for subparagraph above is being requested. L Publicly owned facilities. Roof structures shall be permitted on publicly owned boardwalks, observation platforms, elevated nature trails and other such structures not intended for use as a UJ dock facility, however, vertical walls shall be prohibited. o Comment: The proposed boat slips will be publically owned. No rb C-4 structures or vertical walls are proposed. ';�, 0 0 Section 3 -603. Marinas and marina facilities. A. All proposed activities including, but not limited to, fueling, pumping -out, chartering, living — aboard, launching, dry storage and the servicing of boats, motors and related marine equipment shall require approval in accordance with the provisions of the zoning district in which the marina or marina facility is proposed to be located. Comment: No fueling facilities will be provided as part of this project. Sewerage pump -out facilities will be provided within the north and south basins project. Live - aboards will not be allowed as part of the project. No dry storage is proposed as part of this project. No servicing of boats, motors and related marine equipment will be permitted at the facility. B. For marina facilities located adjacent to residential districts, no fueling or launching facilities shall be located within 20 feet of the residential property line, and no fueling or servicing of boats shall occur at such marinas after 9:00 p.m. or before 6:00 a.m. Comment: No fueling facilities are proposed as part of this project. No boat launching facilities are proposed. No servicing of boats will • occur after 9 PM or before 6 AM. C. No fuel storage facility or sanitary pump -out station holding tank shall be located over water. Comment: No fuel storage facility or sanitary pump -out station holding tank above water are proposed as part of this project. The sewerage pump -out facilities will be located, designed and permitted to meet state and local requirements. The precise locations have not been determined by would likely be located inside the project along the east/west docks paralleling the Promenade. The specific locations will be identified on the final construction plans. D. The marina shall pose no hazard or obstruction to navigation, as determined by the city harbormaster. Comment: The City's Harbor Master, Mr. William Morris, has. determined the marina will pose no hazard or obstruction to navigation. Please refer to previous comments above regarding navigation. E. The marina shall not adversely affect the environment, including both onshore and offshore natural resources. Comment: Please refer to the numerous responses above addressing the marinas impact upon onshore and offshore natural resources. ORIGINAL RECEIVED SEP 2 3 2000 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER F. Adequate sanitary facilities shall be provided landside and a sanitary pump -out station shall be provided and shall be available to marina users 24 hours a day. Comment: Sanitary pump -out facilities will be provided in the north and south basins to accommodate the project. In addition, the City owns a sewerage pump -out vessel that could be utilized at the site if needed. The City has adequate sewerage treatment capacity to accommodate the project. An enclosed trash somts� receptacle will be provided at the Dock Master office building at the north end of the project as noted on the final slip layout plan. Additionally, at least two trash collection facilities will be provided to serve the south basin. G. A manatee protection plan shall be provided and appropriate speed zone signs shall be posted to control boat speed for manatee protection. Comment: There is an existing slow speed minimum wake zone currently in place between the Pierce 100 Condominium and Seminole Launch Ramp with posted speeds to control boaters and protect manatees that might frequent the area. A manatee protection plan will be developed as part of the state and federal permitting processes. H. Adequate spill containment areas shall be provided on the property. Comment: As noted, there are no fueling facilities proposed as part of this project. Similarly, sewage pump -out facilities are proposed as part of the project in the north and south basins. In the event of a spill, the City has a containment process utilizing absorbent booms and pads to contain spills. I. Design of the marina shall maintain existing tidal flushing and aquatic circulation patterns. Comment: Tidal flusing studies and aquatic circulation pattern studies are not required as part of the City permitting process unless called for. The City does not issue dock permits, but relies upon the required permits and /or approvals of Pinellas County, FDEP and the USCOE, where these issues are thoroughly addressed. J. In the event of conflict between these standards and federal or state law or rules, the federal or state law or rules shall apply to the extent that these standards have been preempted; otherwise, the more stringent regulations shall apply. Comment: The City of Clearwater does not issue dock permits. ORIGINAL Since the proposed boat slips are classified as "commercial docks" RECEIVED SEP 2 3 2000 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER 9 under the City's Land Development Code, Community Development Board approval is required. Dock permits are issued by the Pinellas County Inland Navigation Control Authority, Florida Department of Environmental Protection and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, all subsequent to Flexible Development Approval by the City. Each of these permitting requirements is more stringent than the City's approval of this project. ORIGINAL RECEIVED SEP 2 3 2000 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER ' � NEW BRIDGE STRUCTURE MW I - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PINELLAS COUNTY OFFSET - - ------------------------- 1------- - - - -., -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - �o D 10o I - 44 xxxxx wwxxxwxx4 wx4 __ RED LIGHT xxMx. x. ... 6= amij w(fCoe�CviiwueCvlr�aa L'Le91 GRAPHIC SCALE � I sa: - -- _— _- - -_ —_— 1 == 50--- _— _— _— _— _— _ —_ —_— G.I.W.W. CENTERLINE PER US COE j (i -.$ O- -GREEN UGHT�O _— _— _— _— _— _--- _- ------ -- - - - - -- I pm�ai Y�fYU No�LiYYY1zKiPYetLw I }.JmesYi4i NOTES: 1. ALL ELEVATIONS ARE ( +) PLUS UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. ! s 2. ALL OFFSHORE ELEVATIONS REFER TO MEAN LOW WATER DATUM. ALL UPLAND ELEVATIONS REFER TO NAVD 88 (NORTH AMERICAN VERTICAL DATUM OF 1988). x x .. OFFSHORE ELEVATIONS ARE THOSE WATERWARD OF THE APPROXIMATE SEAWALL '.�, Y�iik 'YY YuYYYYL+ 3. 0.0 FEET MEAN LOW WATER = ( -)1.25 FEET NAVD 86. ��` Y "et! i C MEAN LOW WATER VALUE FROM TIDE INTERPOLATION POINT #692, AND POINT #2719, http: / /data.Iabfne.org. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ PINELLAS COUNTY OFFSET 4. VERTICAL CONTROL IS BASED ON CITY OF CLEARWATER BENCH MARK 'F -05x. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ELEVATION- 6.5075 FEET NAVD 88, 5.2575 FEET MEAN LOW WATER. 5. HORIZONTAL CONTROL IS BASED ON USCG BEACON AT MACDILL AIR FORCE BASE. - PLANE COORDINATES BASED ON THE TRANSVERSE MERCATOR PROJECTION FOR THE WEST ZONE OF FLORIDA, N.A.D 1983. 6. A ODOM HYDROGRAPHIC SYSTEMS, INC. HYDROTRAC ECHO SOUNDER WAS USED 1 ` TO OBTAIN THE OFFSHORE ELEVATIONS SHOWN HEREON. 7. A TRIMBLE DGPS SURVEYING SYSTEM WAS USED TO MAINTAIN POSITIONING. ---- - - - - -- -RIGHT OF WAY EASEMENT .------------------------------------- - - - - -- EASEMENT - SEMENT -------- ----- ---- --- - - - - -- 1 ALE DATA SHOWN HEREON IS FROM A SURVEY DATED 4/16/03 FROM -- -� - - -- - -. GEORGE F. YOUNG, INC. (JOB # 03 -13- 0537 -00) §'z 3 9. THE HYDROGRAPHIC INFORMATION DEPICTED HEREON REPRESENTS A SURVEY MADE ON 3/20/06 AND CAN ONLY INDICATE THE GENERAL CONDITIONS EXISTING ON SAID DATE. 10. LOCATION OF 1925 LAND GRANT SHOWN HEREON IS APPROXIMATE AND BASED -x I IN PART ON ELECTRONIC VERSIONS OF PINELLAS COUNTY TAX MAPS. 11. RIGHT OF WAY EASEMENT SHOWN HEREON AS PER TRUSTEES OF THE INTERNAL 1 IMPROVEMENT FUND OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA 'CANAL RIGHT -OF -WAY EASEMENT'. 12. SEAGRASS SHOWN HEREON AS MARKED IN THE FIELD BY TOM CUBA OF DELTA SEVEN ON 5/31/06 AND LOCATED BY GEORGE F. YOUNG WITH REAL TIME SUB -METER DIFFERENTIAL GPS. DETAIL OF CHANNEL, EASEMENTS, AND SETBACKS 1925 LAND GRANT 200' ' 0 100• 200.1,�•� 700.00' GRAPHIC SCALE I I I 1' =.200' N: 1322693.53 E 369350.73\ - - - -I ------------- J31SdLL ----- ---------------- 13219M.49 1 �- -I - - - - .� PJBELI,85 COUNTY OfFSEl - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E: 796142.- - - - GREEN D T - 1 - ��' /• -DELD CENTERUNE PER CHANNEL LIGHTS �_ G.I.W.W. CENTERLINE PER US COU _— j _— _�_ - - -_ i C 1 19.5 121.6' --------- - - -�1/ C3 ° E 398576.]7 i - - - - - PINELI,AS rQUNZ OjESET - --- I------ - - - - --- I _fiisau Wei _ gesENeLU_----------- r----------------------------- - - - - -� N: 1322156.85 E 396823.52 I b I I I I I 1 1 1 1 N \N 9 O a - vF flP� A, �I, BRED UGHT4--' '. .'xs� wxw J+��x xx x�bl� ffPUYNmb- Yp��,PPPPP wV73N � IT_ °�; -NEW BRIDGE .°m !7P _ STRUCTURE 1 1 1 SEE SHEETS 3 THROUGH 5 FOR UPLAND DETAIL DRAWINGS F � o / h APPROXIMATE .... LOCATION OF SEAWALL H 0 :x�..xyux�x Ix'ITiiiTm"nmx -'rx"* wa.mbe'w' it °w °Pbv ====3 :. ,wwx, 44 x >aPama��p Iw�Fo'x wPpe�l. xY�uuwuelw.;irex �� •z wzxx x Oki G wm YNN�N�. ^I G mw <9 20 c'P 9y \ 2 CLIENT THIS SURVEY N IS NOT VALID WITHOUT THE SIGNATURE AND THE ORIGINAL PROJECT NAME REVISIONS RAISED SEAL OF A FLORIDA LICENSED SURVEYOR ANO MAPPER. Wade Trim George F. Young, Inc. SHEET 4919 Memorial Highway, soils 200 HYDROGRAPHIC AND TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY y UCMM BUMfl= 091 ENVIRNMENYM � Tampa, Florida sssaa CLEARWATER BAYFRONT MARINA PG- Sr. PETERSBURG a TAMPA a BRADENTON. GAINESV81E RESPONSIBLE OFFICE:. 298 9M --I North SIIICe 1819 T:P(727) 822 -M3M -0683 727) 822 -2919 Greq S. 111 Pr SEC. TWP. S. RNG.��E. No. - aE51GNED: Flf1D M1E OMWN: M1E D°rMe Surveys a Reg n. PSM# LSS6B3 - OEM PDON 617E BY 20 cxECXm: asN srxe: 1 - S Joe Ne. 07 -13- 0537 -01 Y ORIGI COVED SEP 15 2000 PNG ®j . CITY OF MAMA OR 6-1 ORIGINAL RiECENED SEP 15 2000 PLANNRqG DfiPARTMENT CITY OF CtE&A R r ORIGINAL d�fvh® SEP 15 2000 PLMNWG DEPARTMENT CITY OF C,E&%iA"jiR s ORIGINAL RED SEP 1. 2000 PLANNWG DRARTMENT CITY OF CtEARWA iR 0) ORIGINAL ZED 5EP 2000 P Nh%JG DEWiRTMENT CITY OF CtEAMeAltR Project Description The initial planning and feasibility studies for the Clearwater Downtown Boat Slips project commenced in March 2003. In July 2006, a team of consultants working with City staff finalized the Clearwater Downtown Boat Slips Study which provided recommendations for approximately 138 to 140 wet slips generally located north and south of the new Memorial Causeway Bridge between Drew Street and the existing Pierce 100 Condominium. The study recommended utilizing a concrete floating dock system providing slips and side moorings with slips generally ranging is size from 30 feet to 55 feet and side moorings capable of accommodating vessels of approximately 100 feet in length. In March 2007 a City -wide referendum was held with voters approving the project. The proposed boat slips will also accommodate transient boaters, mooring of boats for Coachman Park or other downtown activities, a ferry landing, and pedestrian docks for residents and visitors frequenting the waterfront area. The proposed ferry landing will be located in the north basin at a location to be determined. At this juncture, the precise size and /or type of ferry vessel has not been determined nor its hours of operation, hence its location and docking needs have not been determined. Notwithstanding, its location will not adversely impact boater safety within or outside of the project footprint depicted on the final slip layout plan. The project has been designed to protect the existing environmental resources including seagrasses adjacent to the seawall through the addition of a pedestrian boardwalk connecting the Drew Street fishing pier to the base of the marina north of the bridge and an additional dock adjacent to the Pierce 100 Condominium. The Drew Street fishing pier will be extended and provide for wave attenuation. The Boat Slips project contains three primary components: (1) the floating docks and wave attenuators, (2) a renovated restroom /laundry/and dock master's office in the existing structure at the end of Drew Street, and (3) upland parking improvements and a drop -off area for boaters, as well as enhanced landscaping, sidewalks, and public art. The project as proposed is a vital component of the Downtown Development Plan and -has been closely coordinated with the recent Cleveland Street design improvements. The Promenade structure (i.e. the pedestrian facility located on top of the old bridge pilings), while in close proximity to the proposed boat slips, is not a part of this Flexible Development Application. No structures will be located under the Memorial Causeway Bridge as required by FDOT. The City of Clearwater has contracted with Misener Marine utilizing, a design -build delivery system to design, permit and construct the boat slips with an estimated completion date of late 2009. It is important to note that the City of Clearwater does not issue dock permits and this Flexible Development Application represents the first of several subsequent approvals and /or permits required for the project to be constructed. More specifically, the Pinellas County Navigation Control Authority, Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP), and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers must also issue required approvals and /or permits before construction can commence. of t • DUALS 1a50WAVEATTFNWmR LIMIT OF USE MODELS 5. 2 OF 8 so3' -s 1/2• r 4a —� 35 -10• u . -,0• u 36• -10• 7 DOCK A 44 -9 1/2 Y -a 7/16• — ' Oq I I • t^ �y�\ �,s DOCK B 1s• CLEATS { P M. FOR FINGERS - ! OYFR _ MODEL 400 CONCRETE FLOATING DOCK SEE DETAILS SHT. 5 OF 6 MODEL 400 CONCRETE FLOATING DOCK_ SEE DETAILS SHT. 3 OF 6 0 u 35 -10• 36• -10• 3S -10• 36• -10• 36' -t0• L 41 MODEL 400 CONCRETE FLOATING DOCK SEE DEIARS AD. 4 OF a 3{2' -to 1/4• MODEL 400 CONCRETE FLOATING DOCK SEE DETAILS SM a OF 6 a' -i F—I-,Y T �p uc:K C l i 12• CLEATS 3 PER IYP. FINGERS LINDE 00 OC' T —� C) 517' 02 E Q O� G SITE PLAN APPI16AD CASE # ELP z•00 9 - D 13 o Z_6 CASE TYPE DRC DATE CDB DATE to_&flot SIGNATURE DATE 0- JZ41dh Se- e- A aria. ORIGIN WC&VED SEP 16 2000 RAINING DWRIMENT CiTY OF OLE41 WMER e• 34' ' SOUT L a- 4-1 1 28Yi 1/2• D 7� 224' �. .yin. G •i: ; . APPROXIMATE J� LOCATION OF SEAWALL V� o� O M O D n D NEW BRIDGE O STRUC111RE0 - GENERAL LOCATION — SEWERAGE PUMP OUT FACILITIES M M O D° O D C In M D 30' CLEARANCE LINE CTYP OF 2) NEµ. Sig Ui a 1490' t , MODEL 850 WAVE ATTENUATOR SEE MODEL 850 WAVE ATTENUATOR SEE 30' CLEARANCE MODEL 400 CONCRETE FLOATING DOCK DETAILS SHT. 2 OF 6 DETAILS HT. 2 OF 6 LINE (TYP OF 2) SEE DETAILS SHT. 5 OF 6 Sal' -s• 17 ,( I _� 115 -2 ] /,� 'PO R • '�• 12 Ff 311' MODEL 400 CO —'R G DOCK SEE DEWti .OF 6 DOCK A 1 NORTH SIN 19' 27 x'�,�. �_ I H BA r T M •g; �€ DOCK B ��:�•��:'� •�.� ��•� ��:��•' � • 417' � '-�` ' G•• . is ,s• ER P ' TI'P. FOR aun i ,P1NDEP5 a OVER H P JeVC � ' • \t n�• s ice: • • : ' • : ' • • : • • : '•.,'�.',••••.' • ••'' • . ,'••' •:•. •: ,'. ••�'' ••'' • . . ;.••' • •• �';�,•' • •'.' •:'.',•,•:�•�• . ; ; . C CD APPRO %IMAIE LO OF SEAWALL 1 8.211.08 0 APPROVED FOR CITY REVIEW ISSUE DATE REV. STATUS NO. MO. 1357' S s0' 0 25' 50' tar GRAPHIC SCALE 1" = 50• FINAL SLIP LAYOUT A L1"6W T 29, 2008 SLIP SCHEDULE NORTH BASIN LENGTH QTY WIDTH DOCK 50'SUPS 24 2 @19 2 @IV 20@1T -IF DOCK 50'SUPS 12 12 @1T DOCK 45'SUPS 5 5 @17 SOUTH BASIN LENGTH QTY WIDTH DOCK so, SUPS 11 2 @20'-6" 9 @ 18' -5" DOCK SS' SUPS 11 2 @ 201-5" 2 @ 22'- 4.75" 2 @20' 2 @ 19' -s" 4 @ 18' -5" DOCK B 40' SUPS 17 17 @ 17 DOCK B SO' SUPS 16 2 @ 18'- 5.125" 14 @ 19' DOCK 45'SUPS 15 1 15 @17' DOCK 30'51 IPS 16 16 @12' TOTAL SLIPS QTY 16 3O'SUPS QTY 17 40'SUPS QTY 20 4S' SUPS QTY 63 50, SUPS QTY it ss'SUPS TOTAL SLIPS =127 COIMIIYCNON NIC OtlON MAYIN� OROY� Misanar Marine Construction, Inc. z - V.P.- MMCI OPERATIONS Tampa, Florida CONK PROD. IENT STEEL atop I cWAaDQB BArNR MGR. MGR. FRB. RD EST' APPROVED BY TITLE DISTRIBVIION 'a!r p'r/ Na'-N z APPROVAL REQUIRE➢ ❑ PIa<6i NNE ��_ APPROVED AS SUBMITTED A 1ETDLED 1avav OF 11ESE NmsNN,S a SameD. N10JFLT WILL X SILT As aavN AND, NAY CONTAIN F]NaPTIDIt fllml m vRnaEaT >PEnnaTtnL TIESL nmAaMls 1 ®c vwrt of 1RE rnNrwcr NsaN AFPNmvVL ❑ APPROVED WITH COMMENTS NO qE- a,MaTfAI. RDNOIEO ❑ REVISE AND RE- SUBMIT- anlNS a1N NNEVaara aam•Afm 50A,1E� TMIS APPROVAL SETMUST BE SIGNED PAID RETURNED FOR PROJECT TO PROLEER NOTE. PILE DESIGN TO BE FINALIZED AFTER ANCHORING ANALYSIS IS COMPLETED NOTE, BOO( AND WAVE ATTORATOE SYSTEMS ARE N07 DESIGNED TO RESIST FORCES ASSOCIATED WITH HIRRMNE SORM EVENTS NOTE, DOGE AND WAVE ATTEMNTOR SYSTEMS ARE NOT DESIGNED TO RESIST FORCES OR ATTEAATE WAVES ASSOCIATED WITH LONG PEFBOD SWELLS THIS DRAWING CONTAINS, PROPRIETARY INFORMATION WHICH IS THE PROPERTY OF SHOREMASTER DNG cars ns�w�RSs Asrm �~'A' a 4�irNr -AAv P /RI IY -VINE f ° OF fxF� r, ^ ix44 l T�.,.•vz. e ,p a PLANNING DEPARTMENT • • CITY OF C LEARWAT ER POST OFFICE BOX 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758 -4748 MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAx (727) 562 -4865 October 29, 2008 Michael Quillen, PE City Engineer City of Clearwater 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, FL 33756 RE: Development Order - Case FLD2008 -08026 210 Drew Street Dear Mr. Quillen: This letter constitutes a Development Order pursuant to Section 4- 206.D.6 of the Community Development Code. On October 21, 2008, the Community Development Board reviewed your request for Flexible Development approval to permit a marina for 127 slips in the Downtown (D) District with a reduction to the side (north) setback from 135.7 to 19 feet, a reduction to the side (south) setback from 135.7 to 27 feet and an increase to the maximum width from 75% of the lot width (1,017.7 feet) to 109.8% of the lot width (1,490 feet), under the provisions of Sections 2- 903.H, 3- 601.C.3 and 3 -603. The Community Development Board (CDB) APPROVED the application with the following Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and Conditions of Approval: Findings of Fact: 1. That the 23.96 acres is located along the Downtown Clearwater Harbor between Drew Street (north) and Pierce Street (south). The overall site is currently developed with the Coachman Park, City Main Library, Harborview Center, Stein Mart and City Hall. The proposed marina will utilize and make improvements to those areas of the subject property adjacent to or in Clearwater Harbor; 2. That there currently exists a public fishing pier on the north side of the project that will remain and be expanded as part of the marina; 3. That on March 13, 2007, Clearwater voters approved a referendum providing for the construction of the proposed downtown boat slips for a maximum of 140 slips; 4. That the site has approximately 1,357 feet of waterfront frontage on Clearwater Harbor between the north and south property lines; 5. That the development proposal consists of the construction of a municipal marina consisting of a 127 -slip concrete floating dock system, with 41 slips in the North Basin and 86 slips in the South Basin; 6. That the design of the docks in both the North and South Basins accommodates maintenance vessels for the bridge and a minimum 30 -foot clearance around the bridge support columns and bases; 7. That on the outside (west side) of the docks in both the North and South Basins adjacent to the channel, as well as the south side of the dock in the North Basin adjacent to the new Memorial October 29, 2008 Quillen — Page 2 Causeway Bridge, the docks accommodate the transient side tie of boats up to 25 feet in width and 100 feet in length or larger for persons traveling up and down the coast (staying for a few days or a week) or for boaters attending events or activities in Coachman Park or the downtown; 8. That boats moored at these transient side ties will be sufficiently set back from the centerline of the channel of the Intracoastal Waterway so as to not impact the safety or navigation of boats in the channel or at the side ties; 9. That the outside (west side) of the docks, as well as the ends of docks, is designed as wave attenuators to reduce wave impacts on boats moored in the slips; 10. That the existing building on the north end at Drew Street will be renovated and expanded toward the south to provide for a harbor master's office, as well as providing restrooms, showers and laundry facilities for persons using the docks in the existing portion of the structure; 11. That based on a parking ratio of one parking space per two slips and 127 proposed slips, a total of 64 parking spaces are required for this marina; 12. That two existing parking lots that will be upgraded to provide parking for the marina. The northern parking lot will have 20 parking spaces, while the southern parking lot will have 46 parking spaces. An additional 59 on- street parking spaces along Cleveland Street and Drew Street proximate to the marina will also be upgraded as part of this project; 13. That there are no properties zoned residentially adjacent to the proposed dock (adjacent properties are zoned Downtown District); 14. That the proposed dock meets the required length criteria of the Code; 15. That the proposal includes a deviation to reduce the side (north) setback from 135.7 to 19 feet and to reduce the side (south) setback from 135.7 to 7.67 feet; 16. That the proposal includes a deviation to increase the maximum width from 75% of the lot width (1,017.7 feet) to 109.8% of the lot width (1,490 feet); 17. That water depths beneath the proposed boat slips range from approximately five feet to approximately 16 feet, providing more than the one -foot clearance distance between the bottom of the vessel and the bottom of the water body at mean low tide; and 18. That there are no outstanding Code Enforcement issues associated with the subject property. Conclusions of Law: 1: That on March 13, 2007, Clearwater voters approved a referendum providing for the construction of the proposed downtown boat slips for a maximum of 140 slips; 2. That the development proposal is consistent with the Flexibility criteria as per Section 2 -903.H of the Community Development Code (Marinas); 3. That the development proposal is consistent with the commercial dock review criteria as per Section 3- 601.C.3 of the Community Development Code; 4. That the development proposal is consistent with the marina review criteria as per Section 3 -603 of the Community Development Code; and 5. That the development proposal is consistent with the General Applicability criteria as per Section 3- 913.A of the Community Development Code. Conditions of Approval: 1. That living aboard non - transient vessels be prohibited, except as may be allowed for private tenants under the Private Docking Permit; 2. That there be no fueling facilities at this marina; 3. That no private tenants conduct any commercial business from any slip at this marina; October 29, 2008 Quillen — Page 3 4. That ferry service may be permitted, with written prior permission from the City Manager or designee, to allow commercial vessels with a base operation in another location other than this marina to pick up and/or drop off customers at this marina; 5. That major servicing of vessels be prohibited, but permissible servicing of vessels be limited to routine maintenance and minor repairs necessary for the preservation and .seaworthiness of the vessel, as determined by the Harbor Master; 6. That signage be permanently installed on the docks or at the entrance to the docks containing wording warning boaters of the existence of protected sea grasses and manatees in the vicinity; 7. That a copy of the SWFWMD and/or FDEP Permit and Corps of Engineer's Permit, if applicable, be submitted to the Planning Department prior to commencement of construction; and 8. That, prior to the issuance of any permit, compliance with all requirements of General Engineering, Traffic Engineering and Stormwater Engineering be met; and 9. That the Public Art and Design Impact Fee be due on this project, pending transfer of impact fee funds. Pursuant to Section 4-407, an application for a building permit or other approvals shall be made within one year of Flexible Development approval (October 21, 2009). All required certificates of occupancy shall be obtained within two years of the date of issuance of the initial building permit. The building permit must be obtained within six months of the initial permit application. This timeframe to obtain the initial building permit may be extended for an additional six months for cause by the Community Development Coordinator. Time frames do not change with successive owners. The Community Development Coordinator may grant an extension of time for the Flexible Development approval for a period not to exceed one year and only within the original period of validity. The issuance of this Development Order does not relieve you of the necessity to obtain any building permits or pay any impact fees that may be required. In order to facilitate the issuance of any permit or license affected by this approval, please bring a copy of this letter with you when applying for any permits or licenses that require this prior development approval. Additionally, an appeal of a Level Two approval (Flexible Development) may be initiated pursuant to Section 4 -502.13 by the applicant or by any person granted party status within 14 days of the date of the CDB meeting. The filing of an application/notice of appeal shall stay the effect of the decision pending the final determination of the case. The appeal period for your case expires on November 4, 2008 (14 days from the date of the CDB meeting). If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call Wayne M. Wells, Planner III, at 727 -562 -4504. You can access zoning information for parcels within the City through our website: www.myclearwater.com/ ,,ov /depts /planning. i cerely, Uq hael Delk, AICP Planning Director S: (Planning DepartmentlC D BIFLEX (FLD)Vnactive or Finished Applications0rew 0210 City Downtown Boat Docks.Marina (D) -Approved 10.08 - WWIDrew 0210 Development Order 10.29.08.doc 00RIGINAL MCENED SEP 10 2000 PMINWG DUARTMENT 'CITY OF CtEARVIATIER and PA, A-0 Mw 1 A.f" 0 '� _. �, g.,� , ' ",+-. �.x€; F� _.may � +:. � � a . +' ` - r ORIGINAL RECOVED SEP 15 2008 PLANNING DEWTMENT CITY OF 0LEAftWAtR 0 0 • ORIGINAL RECENEQ SEP 151008 PLANNING D&WTAAENT CITY OF CLEARWAMIZ • 0 0 0 ORIGIN REED SEP 15 2000 PLANNING QEPWMEAD` CITY OF CLEAIWA rR 0 0 0 0 0 ORIGINAL RECEIVED SEP 1 u 2008 HMNWG DbPPRTmFN7 QW0F ARWA eR 0 0 • C)RIG-INAL RECE E SEP i 2000 OiTY OF CUARWAU Z.V� �K 1 IM5 - Clearwater Downtown Boat Slips is ..., - View looking northwest from Drew Street (north basin) 0 0 e'31t. eD t�' = 2088 PLANlyft D6jo Err CITY OF O jA "R L, I� Ea5T N=1evatio • Ot" \\\ 14 Ne. Wtofl Aden motel ' roring panels -\ pp� A. - 60awj� • 11-_�07 qbqb M %b,"q 1 SCALE: 3 /6' = I' -0' 0 M-Y'31.NAL R..".'ENTD 0 2@08 cm, OF 40 0 11 • U O West Elevation 7 SCALE: 3N' - 1' -0' • plank wdng • 0 f ORIGINAL RL-:,EIYED 0 2008 PMN/,^'�l'D CC'Wr - UMENT • 0 • • South elevation SCALE: 3/14' - 1' -0' • 0 0 s ORIGINAL RECEIVED 0 2006 PLANN,f1`�G I):TAPTMENT CI'`l OF ctu,'#A.,P: i* C C • 0 0 TOP d EXISTING SEAWALL North E SCALE: 1/4' = 1'-0' • t r .^$I • 0 ORIGIN' R`CEIVED • 0 2008 I�•.Y FOUNDATION PLAN FLOOR FRAMING PLAN INvvl i i\nlvulvv I Lniv w � lot JPJ E 0 a o — o— V � O L� G � � o 106 -23 S -1.1 �I au�aaaasuaasa ©mi I it FLOOR FRAMING PLAN INvvl i i\nlvulvv I Lniv w � lot JPJ E 0 a o — o— V � O L� G � � o 106 -23 S -1.1 MATCHLINE TO>1F(EETC 11 \ QOATSLIP ACCE58 CURB / M1M 6TOP6 _ r` f }�iOTAU LClIC. SIDEWALK / SEA WALL CAP _ / e PAT KbdC / CCW- 8LA0 / cow–CURS \ ' / GONG. LI°t8 'D_ETECTADLE TIP. P5f4LPgI4Q DETAIL / _ cm -4 . - - SIDEWALK - -_— -- • - . + ... ` . - - SEA WALL CAP B uu\ ......... main... uauuu�,��■ 210.0111■ I tt 1 R �w 1 a Mi® NORTH ARROW 20' 10' 0' 10' 20' 40• I \ - 1 ORN'MO ° tbtEpllW \ \ awl Yl'/�111 XlM 0 Wb rib• T+°YPN°mC tlAOt 1!Y 8 ' dt e ^ \ A � _ ��r.��•°rw�a'�rAa�� wa CLW2067 -01 M CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA Q Rep NEW UPLAND LINK c.0 �xa� eua.e ENGINEERING Norco °`"as •y n ° _IO w` PROPOSED SITE PLAN ORIGINAL RED SEP 1 2000 PLMNING ® ARTMEIYT CITY OF OLA �R • a -- MATCH INE ■■ � vruuo ■ ■urrrrr • • ' • HIM AND PAVE :. .. 48FQALTP . I WALL LAP —� ,• f ,ccNC: ageuiLK colic xab:vpn. EEN4 � qE'.,. A. . ■rrr ■■rrr■rnr.. f G10 UWINGS r� �rrrr MATCHUNE r -%Tor■ 12 I MATCHUNE rur r■ r ■�rurr r rrrrr u■ TO BHEET C•10 CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA ENGINEERING v t NORTH ARROW 20' 10' 0' 10' 20' 40' F �t'®` Y 'B fIl CLEARWATER NEW UPLAND LINK no,Fn . os is o � nm eC_. PROPOSED SITE PLAN ISM ORiGINAL CEWED S P 15 2000 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CNTY OF 0LEAMVA rR MATCHLINE _ _ _■�I ■ssu■�■�■��■�■�u ■■■ ■ ■■ ■■a■ ■ ■.■■■■■u■s■■ ......... maa■■■ii.omm .'. _ _ TO StlEET U13 MSKEETC -18 I•.•_• •. _ _ . . _ -• -• - { / NORTH ARROW _ / s 20' 10' 0' 10' 20' 10' SILaS x 4 / taut. a1rsB Co cLRB —V E PF °OVED cow-Culm O E OF FLORIDA ARTMEPII O . CCNG SIDEWALK ENTaI. rHOTI:CTiON , • - - - DETECTABLE WARNM rTP. I _- I_-•.•-- --.-.-- i CLILK e COW —NC C CURB AGFYALLF�� LOU * . . . . 9 * 11 y ;... sBqG0aQ,i3 IS 1111' fin am ccNa xdS. row _ • •CMISS MISS N4 sr COW—CURB Q :� "'•�'•�O,Aaly' a�rs� �.y =ter. _ GAG. CURB WALL CAP ,r!1pC P d 7v, coca. Gum /' m WADETPIM y • iioiiii■i■i■i■i u■ .7.. ■■� R �i ....... 0* ro BHEETC 11 TO SHEET C•11 '0 +� ►••� RECORD DRAWINGS ,,+n.y� + J.1� Qt_ CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA LL NEW UPLAND LINK °fl EI k _ 8 ENGINEERING urelnRarw a+ ` *® �� t PROPOSED SITE PLAN Norco oy 19 -• C !2 (PRONAL 2000 PLAN ltd DEPARTMENT CITY OF CUANVAR t � / .. / / / � • • . - • • � • . . - . aEA WALL CAP • � y , /Y� .Tf I - . - _ - . • . _ . i GONG bLAb FOR � � r' + . - -/• 'BENCH' .� x „w •-��_:`�� -. ' wcaxc ,I _ } . - _ • - -GONG CURB Homo _ / -� •'• - - - - ' • ' • ' - LGNG OIDEWALR . cowl DDE3 aq NORTH ARROW a' rALL eLDac wau- g a' CONCRETE SLAB FOR TRASH CaVACTOR rtxCC CON- CLRB EACH SIDE - e SIDEWALK CURB — n ra . _ EEA IVA[L CRP i / DETECTABLE WdpIDL ttP. ' ' CR045014LK ' lreiiureueruur ■ °° °u■ ■■ ■rr■ °°■ ■ r ■u°u °urr°�`r°eurur° °aiiiiEr® TO SHEET 612 TO SHEET C-12 CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA a «r NEW UPLAND LINK A ENGINEERING martrNOr�rKA* �� CEN1�R 4 PROPOSED SITE PLAN m PP I IVED E OF I.ORItIA� F [:C, cN'CA PHOT- �'..TtON :.y1� 1� ]2311 i'Jea B�aC� 99 ♦pJO ir} . `' y 4wf9lgpi3 -+'-` -rl WADEiIIvI POR�.mA lbµb#Ri1W . NOTED �O5 78 +w • ORIGINAL RECHVED SEP 1, o 2008 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWAIR L 0 9 ORIGINAL P-EcavED SEP 15 2008 PLANNING DfiWTMEMt CITY OF CtrAMArie 0 Florida. Department of Environmental Protection Southwest District Office 13051 North Telecom Parkway Temple Terrace, Florida 33637 -0926 1 2 0 200$ Mr. Edward Chesney, P.E., Environmental Manager City of Clearwater 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, Florida 33756 Re: Deminimus Exemption Clearwater Bayfront — Upland Connection FDEP Permit #: 52- 0265938 -004 Pinellas County Dear Mr. Chesney: Charlie Crist Governor Jeff Kottkamp Lt. Governor Michael W. Sole Secretary Thank you for your request to the Department for authorization to make landscapelbeautification improvements and perform maintenance construction at the existing Coachman Park. Improvements include replacing pavement with planters. The project will result in an approximate net decrease of 5,300 square feet of impervious surface and a decrease of 16,000 square feet of impervious area subject to vehicular traffic. The authorization addresses only the specific proposed features shown on the attached Sheets C -10 through C -13 entitled "Proposed Site Plan ", signed and sealed by Michael Edward Rice, P.E., #23070, and dated May 19, 2008. The project site is located at Coachman Park, 301 Drew Street, Northeast of the Memorial Causeway span over Clearwater Harbor, Clearwater, Section 16, Town §hip 29, South, Range 15 East, Pinellas County. This type of activity requires a regulatory authorization for construction and operation of the project pursuant to Part IV, Chapter 373, F.S., unless otherwise exempt by statute or rule, proprietary authorization to use state -owned submerged lands Chapters 253 and 258 F.S., and federal authorization for works in waters of the United States through the State Programmatic General Permit (SPGP) program. Your request has been reviewed for all three authorizations. The authorizations you have been granted are listed below. Please read each section carefully. Your project may not have qualified for all three authorizations. If your project did not qualify for one or more of the authorizations that specific section will advise you how to obtain it. You may NOT commence your project without all three authorizations. If you change the project from what you submitted, the authorization(s) granted may no longer be valid at the time of commencement of the project. Please contact us prior to beginning your project if you wish to make any changes. "Vlore Protection, Less Process" vas �t dip. state. 17. us ORIGI9 - .Et dED SEP 15 2000 %Op4INC DRE CITY 01= r • REGULATORY REVIEW — APPROVED Pursuant to Part IV, Chapter 373, Florida Statutes (F.S.), and based upon the forms, drawings, and documents submitted on March 23, 2008, the proposed project appears to have only minimal or insignificant individual or cumulative adverse impacts on the water resources of the State. Therefore, the proposed project appears to qualify as an activity, which is exempt . from regulation pursuant to Chapter 373.406(6), F.S. A,copy of Chapter 373.406(6), F.S. is attached. This determination is based solely on the information provided to the Department and the statutes and rules in effect when the application was submitted and is effective only for the specific activity proposed. This determination shall automatically expire if site conditions materially change or the governing statutes or rules are amended. In addition, any substantial. modifications in your plans should be submitted to the Department for review, as changes may result in a permit being required. In any event, this determination shall expire after one year. This determination that your activity qualifies for an exemption does not relieve you from the need to comply with all applicable water quality standards during the construction and operation of the facility. Activities conducted under this exemption must be constructed and operated using appropriate best management practices and in a manner, which does not cause water quality violations, pursuant to Rule 62 -302, Florida Administrative Code (F. A. C.). The determination that your project qualifies as an exempt activity pursuant Chapter 373.406(6), F.S. may be revoked if the installation is substantially modified, or if the basis for the exemption is determined to be materially incorrect, or if the installation results in water quality violations. Any changes made in the construction plans or location of the project may necessitate a permit or certification from the Department. Therefore, you are advised to contact the Department before beginning the project and before beginning any work in waters or wetlands, which is not specifically described in your submittal. Authority for review- Part IV of Chapter 373, Florida Statute, Title 62, F.A.C. and in accordance to operating Agreements executed between the department and the Water management Districts, as referenced in Chapter 62 -113, F.A.C. PROPRIETARY REVIEW — APPROVED A review of the location of your proposed project indicates that it is not on state -owned submerged lands. Therefore, your project is exempt from the further requirements of Chapter 253, Florida Statutes. Please be advised that any use of sovereign submerged lands without specific prior authorization from the Board of Trustees will be considered a violation of Chapter 253, Florida Statutes and may subject the affected upland riparian property owners to legal action as well as potential fines for the prior unauthorized use of sovereign land. Clearwater Bayfront — Upland Connection FDEP File No. 52- 0265938 -001 Page 2 of 9 ORIGI SEP 15x.008 pLO�MNNG DEPT= THE Oily OF V. R r • SPGP REVIEW - APPROVED Your project has been reviewed for compliance with a State Programmatic General Permit (SPGP). Your proposed activity, as outlined on the attached drawings, is in compliance with the SPGP program. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) Specific conditions apply to your project, if attached. No further permitting for this activity is required by the Corps. The authority granted under this SPGP expires July 24, 2011. Your project must be completed prior to this expiration date. Authority for review - an agreement with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers entitled "Coordination Agreement Between the U. S. Army Corps of Engineers (Jacksonville District) and the Florida Department of Environmental Protection State Programmatic General Permit, Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbor Act of 1899 and Section 404 of the Clean Water Act. Please see the.copies of the exemption attached to this letter and note that all specific conditions in the rule must be met in order to qualify for this exemption. If you have any questions, please contact Mr. Dennis Pierson at 813- 632 -7600 extension 398. When referring to this project, please use the file number listed above. Sincerely, la William L. Vorstadt Environmental Administrator Environmental Resource Management cc: Mr. Michael E. Rice, P.E., Project Manager - Water Resources, Wade Trim, Inc., 8745 Henderson Road, Suite 220 Renaissance 5, Tampa, Florida 33634 Enclosures: Chapter 373.406(6), F.S., 1 page Notice of Rights of Substantially Affected Persons, 1 page General Conditions for Federal Authorization for SPGP IV -R1, 2 pages Attachment "A" For Discretionary Publication, 2 pages Attachments: Proposed Site Plan, Sheets C -10, C -11, C -12, C -13 OL Clearwater Bayfront — Upland Connection FDEP File No. 52- 0265938 -001 Page 3 of 9 r • Chapter 373.406(6), F.S. Any district or the Department may exempt from regulation under this part those activities that the district or Department determines will have only minimal or insignificant individual or cumulative adverse impacts on the water resources of the district. The district and the Department are authorized to determine, on a case -by -case' basis, whether a specific activity comes within this exemption. Requests to qualify for this exemption shall be submitted in writing to the district or Department, and such activities shall not be commenced without a written determination from the district or Department confirming that the activity qualifies for the exemption. Clearwater Bayfront — Upland Connection FDEP File No. 52- 0265938 -001 Page 4 of 9 ORIGIRK C a�D fi —P" a 200 RIGHTS OF AFFECTED PARTIES PLMNING D TMENr CITY. OF MAINATR This determination is final and effective on the date filed with the Clerk of the Department unless a sufficient petition for an administrative hearing is timely filed under sections 120.569 and 120.57 of the Florida Statutes as provided below. If a sufficient petition for an administrative hearing is timely filed, this determination automatically becomes only proposed agency action subject to the result of the administrative review process. Therefore, on the filing of a timely and sufficient petition, this action will not be final and effective until further order of the Department. The procedures for petitioning for a hearing are set forth in the attached notice. This determination is based on the information you provided the Department and the statutes and rules in effect when the application was submitted and is effective only for the specific activity proposed. This determination shall automatically expire if site conditions materially change .or the governing statutes or rules are amended. In addition, any substantial modifications in your plans should be submitted to the Department for review, as changes may result in a permit being required. In any event, this determination shall expire after one year. Be advised that your neighbors and other parties who may be substantially affected by the proposed activity, allowed under this determination of exemption have a right to request an administrative hearing on the Department's decision that the proposed activity qualifies for this exemption. Because the administrative hearing process is designed to redetermine final agency action on the application, the filing of a petition for an administrative hearing may result in a final determination that the proposed activity is not authorized under the exemption established under Chapter 373.406(6), Florida Statutes. The Department will not publish notice of this determination. Publication of this notice by you is optional and is not required for you to proceed. However, in the event that an administrative hearing is held and the Department's determi nation is reversed, proceeding with the proposed activity before the time period for requesting an administrative hearing has expired would mean that the activity was conducted without the required permit. If you wish to limit the time within which all substantially affected persons may request an administrative hearing, you may elect to publish, at your own expense, the enclosed notice (Attachment A) in the legal advertisement section of a newspaper of general circulation in the county where the activity is to take place. A single publication will suffice. If you wish to limit the time within which any specific person(s) may request an administrative hearing, you may provide such person(s), by certified mail, a copy of this determination, including Attachment A. For the purposes of publication, a newspaper of general circulation means a newspaper meeting the requirements of sections 50.011 and 50.031 of the Florida Statutes. In the event you do publish this notice, within seven days of publication, you must provide to the following address proof of publication issued by the newspaper as provided in section 50.051 of the Florida Statutes. If you provide direct written notice to any person as noted above, you must provide to the following address a copy of the direct written notice. Clearwater Bayfront — Upland Connection FDEP File No. 52- 0265938 -001 Page 5 of 9 01. a GENERAL CONDITIONS FOR FEDERAL AUTHORIZATION FOR SPGP rV -RI 1. The time limit for completing the work authorized ends on July 24, 2011. 2. You must maintain the activity authorized by this permit in good condition and in conformance with the terms and conditions of this permit. You are not relieved of this requirement if you abandon the permitted activity, although you may make a good faith transfer to a third party in compliance with General Condition 4 below. Should you wish to cease to maintain the authorized activity or should you desire to abandon it without a good faith transfer, you must obtain a modification of this permit from this office, which may require restoration of the area. 3. If you discover any previously unknown historic or archeological remains while accomplishing the activity authorized by this permit, you must immediately notify this office of what you have found. We will initiate the Federal and State coordination required to determine if the remains warrant a recovery effort or if the site is eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places. 4. If you sell the property associated with this permit, you must obtain the signature and mailing address of the new. owner in the space provided below and forward a copy of the permit to this office to validate the transfer of this authorization. 5. If a conditioned water quality certification has been issued for your project, you must comply with the conditions specified in the certification as special conditions to this permit. 6. You must allow representatives from this office to inspect the authorized activity at any time deemed necessary to ensure that it is being or has been accomplished in accordance with the term:j3%AFa&ions of your permit. ��d�N� WCEWED Further Information: 1. Limits of this authorization. PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF OLEARWAU a. This permit does not obviate the need to obtain other Federal, State, or local authorizations required by law. b. This permit does not grant any property rights or exclusive privileges. c. This permit does not authorize any injury to the property or rights of others. d. This permit does not authorize interference with any existing or proposed Federal projects. 2. Limits of Federal Liability. In issuing this permit, the Federal Government does not assume any liability for the following: a. Damages to the permitted project or uses thereof as a result of -other permitted or unpermitted activities or from natural causes. b. *Damages to the permitted project or uses thereof as a result of current or future activities undertaken by or, on behalf of the United States in the public interest. Clearwater Bayfront — Upland Connection FDEP File No. 52- 0265938 -001 Page 6 of 9 • w c. Damages to persons, property, or to other permitted or unpermitted activities or structures caused by the activity authorized by this permit. d. Design or Construction deficiencies associated with the permitted work. e. Damage claims associated with any future modification, suspension, or revocation of this permit. 3. Reliance on Applicant's Data: The determination of this office that issuance of this permit is not contrary to the public interest was made in reliance on the information you provided. 4. Reevaluation of Permit Decision: This office may reevaluate its decision on this permit at any time the circumstances warrant. Circumstances that could require a reevaluation include, but are not limited to, the following: a. You fail to comply with the terms and conditions'of this permit. b. The information provided by you in support of your permit application proves to have been false, incomplete, or inaccurate (see 3 above). c. Significant new information surfaces which this office did not consider in reaching the original public interest decision. 5. Such a reevaluation may result in a determination that it is appropriate to use the suspension, modification, and revocation procedures contained in 33 CFR 325.7 or enforcement procedures such as those contained in 33 CFR 326.4 and 326.5. The referenced enforcement procedures provide for the issuance of an administrative order requiring you comply with the terms and conditions of your permit and for the initiation of legal action where appropriate. You will be required to pay for any corrective measures ordered by this office, and if you fail to comply with such directive, this office may in certain situations (such as those specified in 33 CER 209.170) accomplish the corrective measures by contract or otherwise and bill you for the cost. 6. When the structures or work authorized by this permit are still in existence at the time the property is transferred, the terms and conditions of this permit will continue to be binding on the new owner(s) of the property. To validate the transfer of this permit and the associated liabilities associated with compliance with its terms and conditions, have the transferee sign and date below. (TRANSFEREE - SIGNATURE) (NAME- PRINTED) (ADDRESS) (DATE) Clearwater Bayfront - Upland Connection FDEP File No. 52- 0265938 -001 Page 7 of 9 ORIGIN& p.ECEWED PLANNING DEWTMENT CITY OF CLEMWAR ATTACHMENT "A" FOR DISCRETIONARY PUBLICATION OF NOTICE OF DETERMINATION OF QUALIFICATION FOR AN EXEMPTION In the Matter of an Application for a Determination of Qualification for an Exemption by: Mr. Edward Chesney, P.E., Environmental Manager City of Clearwater 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, Florida 33756 FDEP File No.: 52- 0265938 -001 County: Pinellas The Department of Environmental Protection gives notice that it has received a request for authorization to make landscape/beautification improvements and perform maintenance construction at the existing Coachman Park, this activity appears to have only minimal or insignificant individual or cumulative adverse impacts on the water resources of the State, and has therefore determined the activity to be exempt from regulation under Chapter 373.406(6), Florida Statutes. A person whose substantial interests are affected by the Department's action may petition for an administrative proceeding (hearing) under sections 120.569 and 120.57 of the Florida Statutes. The petition must contain the information set forth below and must be filed (received by the clerk) in the Office. of General Counsel Hof the Department at 3900 Commonwealth Boulevard, Mail Station 35, Tallahassee, Florida 32399 -3000. Mediation is not available. If a timely and sufficient petition for an administrative hearing is filed, other persons whose substantial interests will be affected by the outcome of the administrative process have the right to petition to intervene in the proceeding. Intervention will be permitted only at the discretion of the presiding officer upon the filing of a motion in compliance with rule 28- 106.205 of the Florida Administrative Code. In accordance with rule 62- 110.106(3), Florida Administrative Code, petitions for an administrative hearing must be filed within 21 days of publication of the notice or receipt of written notice, whichever occurs first. Under rule 62- 110.106(4) of the Florida Administrative Code, a person whose substantial interests are affected by the Department's action may also request an extension of time to file a petition for an administrative hearing. The Department may, for good cause shown, grant the request for an extension of time. Requests for extension of time must be filed with the Office of General Counsel of the Department at 3900 Commonwealth Boulevard, Mail Station 35, Tallahassee, Florida 32399 -3000 prior to the applicable deadline. A timely request for extension of time shall toil the running of the time period for filing a petition until the request is acted upon. Upon motion by the requesting party showing that the failure to file a request for an extension of time before the deadline was the result of excusable neglect, the Department may also grant the requested extension of time. ORION& CENED Clearwater Bayfront — Upland Connection FDEP File No. 52- 0265938 -001 r � 1 5 2008 �r Page 8 of 9 9),LANNING DEMRTMENT • a The petitioner shall mail a copy of the petition to the applicant at the address indicated above at the time of filing. The failure of any person to file a petition for an administrative hearing within the appropriate time period shall constitute a waiver of that right. A petition that disputes the material facts on which the Department's action is based must contain the following information: (a) The name and address of each agency affected and each agency's file of identification number, if known; (b) The name, address, and telephone number of the petitioner; the name, address, and telephone number of the petitioner's representative, if any, which shall be the address for service purposes during the course of the proceeding; and an explanation of how the petitioner's substantial interests are or will be affected by the agency determination; (c) A statement of when and how the petitioner received notice of the agency decision; (d) A statement of all disputed issues of material fact. If there are none, the petition must so indicate; (e) A concise statement of the ultimate facts alleged, including the specific facts the petitioner contends warrant reversal or modification of the agency's proposed action; (f) A statement of the specific rules or statutes that the petitioner contends require reversal or modification of the agency's proposed action; and (g) A statement of the relief sought by the petitioner, stating precisely the action that the petitioner wishes the agency to take with respect to the agency's proposed action. A petition that does not dispute the material facts on which the Department's action is based shall state that no such facts are in dispute and otherwise shall contain the same information as set forth above, as required by rule 28- 106.301. Under sections 120.569(2)(c) and (d) of the Florida Statutes, a petition for administrative hearing shall be dismissed by the agency if the petition does not substantially comply with the above requirements or is untimely filed. Complete copies of all documents relating to this determination of exemption are available for public inspection during normal business hours, 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, at the Department's Southwest District Office, 13051 North Telecom Parkway, Temple Terrace, FL 33637 -0926. (DRIGI" 6 LANNIN G DRARTMENT Clearwater Bayfront — Upland Connection C-iTy . ()F CLWWAT R FDEP File No. 52- 0265938 -001 Page 9 of 9 FLD2008 -08026 210 DREW ST DOWNTOWN BOAT SLIPS PLANNER OF RECORD: WW ATLAS # 286A ZONING: D LAND USE: CBD RECEIVED: 08/04/2008 INCOMPLETE: COMPLETE: MAPS: PHOTOS: STAFF REPORT: DRC: CDB: CLWCoverSheet Wells, Wayne From: Chesney, Ed Sent: Thursday, July 30, 2009 3:17 PM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: County Permit Wayne, I talked with Pinellas County regarding the 25.5' VS 27.0' set back from Pierce -100. They do not need to amend anything since it does not get any closer. He also told me that they allow a one foot setback tolerance on docks /pilings, realizing the challenges of placement while working off of a barge. The As -Built are all they require. Ed Ed Chesney, P.E. Environmental Manager City of Clearwater 100 S. Myrtle Ave. #220 Clearwater, FL. 33756 -5520 727- 562 -4742 <o r Wells, Wayne • From: Chesney, Ed Sent: Thursday, July 16, 2009 8:11 AM To: Katie Marsh Cc: 'Schofield, Andy; Quillen, Michael; Wells, Wayne; Rice, Scott Subject: RE: Dock A Set Backs Yes we will red line the existing sheet. Thanks From: Katie Marsh [ mailto :kmarsh @misenermarine.com] Sent: Thursday, July 16, 2009 7:42 AM To: Chesney, Ed Cc: 'Schofield, Andy' Subject: FW: Dock A Set Backs Ed /Andy, Shore Master will get the 27' set back to work. Can you just redline the plans to show the 27' setbacks so we can get ,,this turned around quicker? Katie ::From: ,Christopher Winter [mailto: Christopher .Winter @shoremaster.com] -Sent: Wednesday, July 15, 2009 4:04;PM , ; To: Katie Marsh Subject: RE: Dock A Set Backs We will make the 21'sefbaek work, we are going to have to modify the gangways a Little.' I,w:ill,get1the'pile coordinates and drawings updates and sent over. CW From: Katie Marsh [ mailto :kmarsh @misenermarine.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 15, 2009 1:41 PM To: Christopher Winter Subject: Dock A Set Backs Chris, Please just let me know that you will be able to meet the 27' set back and what the other dock setbacks will be after you rotate the south basin. Thanks! Katie Marsh, P.E. Project Engineer Misener Marine Construction Inc Office (727) 584 -5308 Mobile (813) 727 -1461 1 w � Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Wednesday, November 05, 2008 9:42 AM To: Horne, William; Irwin, Rod; Silverboard, Jill; Delk, Michael; Morris, William D.; Quillen, Michael; Chesney, Ed; Akin, Pam; Dougall- Sides, Leslie; Lipowski, Laura; Carnley, Rick; Dave Gildersleeve (E- mail); Simmons, Margie Subject: FLD2008- 08026, 210 Drew Street, Downtown Marina On October 21, 2008, the Community Development Board (CDB) approved the above referenced application. By Code, an appeal of the CDB decision must be filed within 14 days of the CDB decision (November 4th was the deadline). No appeal was filed against this case. Based on a St. Petersburg Times article in today's newspaper, the Pierce 100 opponents will oppose this project at the County, State and Corps of Engineers levels (see attached). Based on no appeal being filed, applications for building permits for the harbormaster building, the upland improvements and the County, State and Corps permits may be submitted. Wayne M. Wells, AICP Planner III City of Clearwater 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, FL 33756 -5520 Phone: 727 - 562 -4504 Fax: 727 - 562 -4865 St. Pete Times 4rticle 11.5.08... Wells, Wayne From: Quillen, Michael Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2008 4:16 PM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: RE: FLD2008- 08026, 210 Drew Street If Bill has seen it we are fine. Michael D. Quillen, P.E. Director of Engineering City of Clearwater michael.quillen c,mycleanvater.com 727 -562 -4743 - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2008 4:16 PM To: Quillen, Michael Subject: RE: FLD2008- 08026, 210 Drew Street Bill Morris saw a draft report with the conditions and he gave me comments that have been reflected in the staff report (with the exception of saying "up to 140 slips" as we advertised 127 slips). Rod was not sent the draft Staff Report. - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Quillen, Michael Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2008 4:10 PM To: Wells, Wayne Cc: Chesney, Ed Subject: RE: FLD2008- 08026, 210 Drew Street The conditions look fine to me: Did you also run them by Rod & Bill Morris? Michael D. Quillen, P.E. Director of Engineering City of Clearwater michael. quillenr •myclearwater. com 727 - 562 -4743 - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2008 4:05 PM To: Quillen, Michael Cc: Chesney, Ed Subject: FLD2008- 08026, 210 Drew Street Mike /Ed - Attached is the Staff Report for the above referenced case to be heard by the CDB at their meeting on October 21, 2008. Please review the Conditions of Approval and let me know no later than 10:00 am on Monday, October 20, 2008, if the Conditions of Approval are acceptable or not. My attached expert witness resume needs to be attached to the report. Thanks. Wayne M. Wells, AICP Planner III City of Clearwater 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, FL 33756 -5520 Phone: 727 - 562 -4504 Fax: 727-562-4865 - << File: Drew 0210 Staff Report.doc >> << File: Wells Wayne - Expert Witness Resume.doc >> Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2008 4:05 PM To: Quillen, Michael Cc: Chesney, Ed Subject: FLD2008- 08026, 210 Drew Street Mike /Ed - Attached is the Staff Report for the above referenced case to be heard by the CDB at their meeting on October 21, 2008. Please review the Conditions of Approval and let me know no later than 10:00 am on Monday, October 20, 2008, if the Conditions of Approval are acceptable or not. My attached expert witness resume needs to be attached to the report. Thanks. Wayne M. Wells, AICP Planner III City of Clearwater 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, FL 33756 -5520 Phone: 727 - 562 -4504 Fax: 727- 562 -4865 Drew 0210 Wells Wayne - 5taff Report.doapert Witness R Il 0 • Wells, Wayne From: Morris, William D. Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2008 10:21 AM To: Wells, Wayne; Carnley, Rick Cc: Chesney, Ed Subject: RE: FLD2008- 08026, 210 Drew Street Importance: High On Page 2 of 11- the 127 slip number shows up and appears to be a restriction throughout the document... can we say approximately 127 slips? The referendum allowed us a maximum of 140After my "FDOT comments below, about no permanent slips under the bridge but we could have temporary slips, we put a specific number on the slip count in the .north and south basin. Again could we say approximately 41 slips in the North Basin and approximately 86 slips in the south basin? Same paragraph further down we speak to transient side tie and appear to limit the length of the vessels to 100 feet. We could get vessels longer generally private vessels would not exceed 100 to 125 feet along the transient side tie areas as a maximum. (the vessel length is really more constrained by the ICW approach channels which have a dredged depth of 9 feet. While out outer docks have 12 to 16 feet of water, you only have 9 feet in the approach channels. that limits the size of the vessels that can get to the marina. Tiger Woods used to be a regular guest with his 109 foot vessel. when he got his new 129 foot vessel his new vessel drew too much water to get into Clearwater Harbor and could not get to the marina any longer. John Travolta has a yacht over 100 feet and uses the Municipal Marina, I would expect he would use the downtown Marina. I would not want to restrict length to 100 feet. Top of page 3 the 127 foot comment again ... (about 4 lines down) can we say approximately here as well? I noted some restrictions on the construction of the dockmaster /habormaster /security /restroom building. 2nd line down on page 3 we say Gray cement plank siding. Do you want Rick Carnley to comment on that I was not sure if we were going with Fiber cement "Hardie board" or painted t -111. (RICK ?) Page 4 about line 9 down "Access to the docks" might better read shore side access to the docks is limited to three points of entry. Having the promenade in that sentence confuses things, the promenade is not connected to the docks and has its own entrance only from the mainland. Lastly in the findings of fact page 10 we have hard numbers on the slip count of 127 total, 41 in the north basin and 86 in the south basin, my earlier comments on tying us to a hard number when we may go up or down one or two slips in total and therefore in either location. One last thing. If we have to make some setback changes we may lose two 50 foot slips but due to the configuration pick up an 80 to 100 foot slip. The language does not seem to allow us to do that. That is all I can come up with, sorry for the delay, thanks for the effort to get this to me for comment, Bill M - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2008 8:50 AM To: Morris, William D. Subject: RE: FLD2008- 08026, 210 Drew Street No, this is the type of review I need to make sure the Staff Report is a correct representation of the project. Your comments are good. Any more? - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Morris, William D. Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2008 8:37 AM To: Wells, Wayne; Chesney, Ed Subject: RE: FLD2008- 08026, 210 Drew Street Wayne, I have the paper copy and while the changes seem minor to me, in the first sentence under "Development approval we limit ourselves to 127 slips when we may squeeze out a few more or may have one or two less, does using a firm 127 restrict us in any way, if so it has to be a range as the original proposal was No more than 140 Slips or up to a maximum of Olips. I am not sure if we are tying or hana*ing a firm 127 number. A couple of lines down it says "Due to the FDOT requirement no slips can be situated under the bridge. What FDOT said is no permanent slips can be under the bridge, they allowed we could use the space for transient side tie moorings. again am I picking this apart too much? Bill - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Monday, October 13, 2008 4:41 PM To: Chesney, Ed; Morris, William D. Subject: FLD2008- 08026, 210 Drew Street �off.- 711! I have previously sent you the Draft Staff Report for this application for your review and comment. I really need your review as soon as possible in order to finalize this Staff Report. Thanks. Wayne M. Wells, A/CP Planner III City of Clearwater 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, FL 33756 -5520 Phone: 727 - 562 -4504 Fax: 727 - 562 -4865 0 0 Wells, Wayne From: Morris, William D. Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2008 8:37 AM To: Wells, Wayne; Chesney, Ed Subject: RE: FLD2008- 08026, 210 Drew Street Wayne, I have the paper copy and while the changes seem minor to me, in the first sentence under "Development approval we limit ourselves to 127 slips when we may squeeze out a few more or may have one or two less, does using a firm 127 restrict us in any way, if so it has to be a range as the original proposal was No more than 140 Slips or up to a maximum of 140 slips. I am not sure if we are tying or hands using a firm 127 number. A couple of lines down it says "Due to the FDOT requirement no slips can be situated under the bridge. What FDOT said is no permanent slips can be under the bridge, they allowed we could use the space for transient side tie moorings. again am I picking this apart too much? Bill - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Monday, October 13, 2008 4:41 PM To: Chesney, Ed; Morris, William D. Subject: FLD2008- 08026, 210 Drew Street Ed & Bill - I have previously sent you the Draft Staff Report for this application for your review and comment. I really need your review as soon as possible in order to finalize this Staff Report. Thanks. Wayne M. Wells, AICP Planner III City of Clearwater 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, FL 33756 -5520 Phone: 727 - 562 -4504 Fax: 727 - 562 -4865 0 9 Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Friday, October 10, 2008 11:04 AM To: Chesney, Ed; Morris, William D.; Dave Gildersleeve (E -mail) Subject: FLD2008- 08026, 210 Drew Street - Downtown Marina Ed /Bill /Dave - I have completed my draft of the Staff Report for the Downtown Marina. Please review this document for accuracy of information by noon on Monday, October 13th, so that I can finalize this Staff Report. Please especially review the conditions of approval. Please let me know of any corrections, additions. or deletions necessary. Thanks. Wayne M. Wells, AICP Planner III City. of Clearwater 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater,. FL 33756 -5520 Phone: 727- 562 -4504 Fax: 727 - 562 -4865 Drew 0210 Staff Report.doc Wells, Wayne From: Morris, William D. Sent: Thursday, October 09, 2008 10:33 AM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: CITY OF CLEARWATER/MARINE DEPARTMENT �W 2007 PRIVATE CK PERMIT wit Just so you have a copy, here is the Dock permit with the rules. and regulations for the existing Municipal marina. I will cut this up and answer your questions but I wanted you to see what we have out at the beach and is currently under review in legal for some changes. The changes for the beach would be for the length of time we rent the slip to give the slip renters a longer term. Dock Permit than 30 days. Not germane to our issue at hand, Bill M City *Clearwater Marine and Aviation Depar9nt Clearwater Municipal Marina 25 Causeway Blvd Clearwater, Florida 33767 Phone (727) 462 -6954 Fax (727) 462 -6957 Private Docking Permit Date: Commencing Slip # Facility: Marina Island Estates Monthly Base Fee $ (Dock box & electric billed monthly) Owners Name RES NON Owners Address Street Owners Address City State Zip Owners Phone #'s Home Work Cell Owners e-mail address Vessel Name Declared Value $ Vessel Reg /Doc Vessel Overall Length & Beam Length: Beam: U.S. Coast Guard License # Expiration Date Manufacturers Name Model Year Manufacturers Serial # Fuel: Gas Diesel Hull Material Wood Aluminum Steel Fiberglass Propulsion: Inboard Outboard Inboard Outboard Sail The undersigned hereby makes application for a docking permit and for the above - designated berthing accommodations for the vessel named herein. By his signature below, the applicant acknowledges having read, understood, and agrees to abide by all conditions of this permit as printed hereon and by the Mules and Regulations governing occupancy of the space and use of the facility. By signature of its authori .Zed official, the City of Clearwater approves the issuance of this permit subject to the terms and conditions referred to below. Applicant agrees to keep current all information. CONDITIONS, RULES & REGULATIONS 1. CONDITIONS Rr AT TTRORTTY: This permit is non - transferable and applies only to the above named vessel, owner and /or operator, facility and space. This permit shall not be construed as granting any property interest in the slip or facility, but shall be deemed a license agreement subject to all the terms contained herein and the . applicable ordinances of the City. The City,reserves the right to discontinue furnishing these accommodations, that is, to cancel this permit and change the rental rate for space by giving or mailing notice in writing to the owner or operator at either of the above addresses (Code of Ordinances Sec. 33.027 and Sec. 33.028). 1 _ A - R EQI TTR ED DOLT TMENTS- Copies of the current Florida vessel registration will be provided to the Marine & Aviation Director or his designee yearly, as well as all applicable renewal documents. Revised per City Council meeting 7/15/04; incl 1st Addendum 2/15/05, 2 ❑d Addendum 8/4/05; & 3'd Addendum 8/17/06 Page 1 2. PAYMENT OF T)QC'KAC'TF F Upon acceptance of a slip, the first anu last month's slip rent is due; thereafter rent and other applicable fees- will- be invoiced to the owners address each month. Slip rent and other fees are due upon receipt of invoice, by the fit-,t of e,,h month; and hefvre late after the fifteenth of each month. Owners may request credit card I processing each month upon submission of completed authorization form - with signature. Failure to pay for ffm= tw-a_consecutive months will result in the cancellation of the dock permit ...� • n • • . • u . ■ • • . • • • • • •• n • • r ru • • • • • i and Sec. 33.029) (Code of Ordinances Other applicable fees: Fee for automatic credit card processing of monthly charges $ 5.00 Fee for late payment of rent (assessed on the x10 of the month) $30.00 r . -• •• - I K0 0 1 RM10 II GeAr •. - r Fuel Payment Policy — payment for fuel must be obtained at the time of purchase. If the credit card is declined, a check or cash must be received prior to the boat leaving the fuel dock slip. 3. AC CF.,-, To R()AT: Vessel owners hereby authorize the City to board their vessel to make adjustments to mooring lines or to move the above described vessel, as may be required in an emergency situation, or to avoid loss or damage to city owned facilities, or to maintain the marina such as dredging, dock or seawall repairs or improvements. The City shall be held harmless by the owner of any liabilities whatsoever or for any damage occasioned thereby. 4. C ONDI TC'T: No person shall interfere with the public's use of the marina area or infringe upon the normal operation of any other persons who are authorized to conduct business within the marina. A determination by the Marine & Aviation Director or his designee will be accepted as final in evaluating and limiting activities, which may infringe upon the rights of others. Disorderly conduct, which includes threats to harm people or property of any other tenant, marina employee or member of the public by a tenant, his employees or visitors will be subject to immediate removal from the marina. Also, public intoxication, profanity or abusive language directed at anyone will not be tolerated. 5. 'BOAT OWNER'S RRSPONSTRTT.TTY; MATNTFNANC R: Vessels shall be kept in a seaworthy /operating condition, and shall create neither fire hazards, eyesores, or sinking hazards. If a vessel is observed in an unsafe condition, the owner(s) will be directed by the Marine & Aviation Director or his designee to remove the vessel from the Marina. Owner(s) agree to remove the vessel upon notification by the City of an unsafe condition(s) or to be held responsible for all and any damage caused by the vessel to Marina docks, pilings and structures. The owner shall keep the vessel properly moored and dry within at all times. Routine maintenance and minor repair necessary for the preservation and seaworthiness of the vessel such as mechanical adjustment, minor painting, leak seals and rot prevention may be performed within the marina. Such repairs are generally considered to be those which: • Do not disturb the public peace and tranquility of any person aboard any vessel within the jurisdiction of the marina. • Do not contribute to a disorderly or unsightly appearance during the process of repair or maintenance. • Are capable of accomplishment with hand tools or certain portable power tools normally carried aboard the vessel. Revised per City Council meeting 7/15/04; incl 1st Addendum 2/15/05, 2nd Addendum 8/4/05, & 3.d Addendum 8/17/06 Page 2 • Are confined to the vessel. • • Do not pollute or put wastes in marina waters. 6. LAW, R1 TT RS AND R F.G1 TT .A TIONS: Boat owner shall comply with the Marina Rules. The Marina may change the Marina Rules by posting new ones or otherwise notifying boat owner of the change. In using the Marina, boat owner shall comply with all applicable laws, ordinances, resolutions, rules and regulations of federal U.S. Coast Guard regulations, state and local entities. • The private tenant shall not conduct commercial business under this private docking permit. • Living aboard vessels is prohibited. Private tenants may stay aboard a total of 8 nights per month. • Subleasing of space or permitting any vessel not named in this permit to use the space named herein is not permitted. Any other vessel mooring within this space may do so only with prior written permission of the Marine & Aviation Director or his designee, who will charge the daily transient rate currently in effect. • Any owner expecting to vacate his slip for any period in excess of seven (7) consecutive days shall notify the Marine &Aviation Director or his designee in advance in writing. • If the slip will be vacated for 60 consecutive days, the tenant will notify the Marine & Aviation Director or his designee of the vacancy prior to the departure of the vessel. A request for an extension of one 60 -day period shall be made in writing and may be approved at the Marine & Aviation Director's discretion. Failure to notify the Marine & Aviation Director of the need for a 60 -day extension will result in termination on the 61St day. The slip shall not be vacated for more than 120 days. On the 121s' day, the slip will become available for a new tenant unless an extension is specifically authorized by the Marine & Aviation Director due to extenuating circumstances. Extenuating circumstances will be determined on a case -by -case basis, and will be at the discretion of the Marine & Aviation Director or his designee. • The City reserves the right to use any empty slip for temporary transient boaters, after verifying by phone that the permanent tenant will not be using the slip, without subsidizing the dock permit holder. The electric usage for this period of use by the transient boater will not be charged to the permanent tenant. • Moving to different locations or transferring vessels between spaces within the facility may be affected only with prior written permission of the Marine & Aviation Director or his designee, and filling out a new docking permit if it will be a permanent move. • All vessels underway within the marina basin shall be operated at idle speed, and not create a wake. • Swimming, diving, fishing and cast netting is prohibited from marina docks and seawalls. • No outside labor craftsmen may work on any vessels in the marina, without first obtaining permission from the Marine & Aviation Director or his designee's office. Such approval will only be given to those labor craftsman who show proof of liability insurance, have a valid City of Clearwater occupational license or have registered as a vendor with the City of Clearwater. The City may not be held liable for any damages or negligence from outside labor working on vessels within the marina. • Work may be allowed on a vessel if it causes no public nuisance to other marina tenants. Such work may be performed between the hours of 8 a.m. and 5 p.m. • It shall be unlawful for any person to willfully make, continue or cause to be made or continued any loud and raucous noise which because of its volume level, duration and character, annoys, disturbs, injures or endangers the comfort, health, peace or safety of reasonable persons of ordinary sensibilities within the limits of the City. This Development Code Section 3 -1508 includes engine exhaust. • No refuse shall be thrown overboard at the marina. Garbage and trash shall be deposited in the dumpsters. • Oil spills shall be reported to the USCG and the Marine & Aviation Director or his designee's office. • Vessel owner shall not store supplies, materials or accessories upon, nor make any changes, alterations or additions to docks, catwalks, seawalls or other public property without prior written permission from the Marine & Aviation Director or his designee. WASTE OIL - All waste oil must be placed in the waste oil tank, which is located in the marine service shop area. Waste oil must not be placed in garbage cans, pails or liners or dumped into marina waters. Sewage pump -out facilities are available at the fuel dock. This service is available to all permit holders at no Revised per City Council meeting 7/15/04; incl 1st Addendum 2/15/05, 2nd Addendum 8/4/05, & 3rd Addendum 8/17/06 Page 3 charge. • • • Water shall not to be wasted. The Florida Administrative Code 40D -22 states washing vehicles, cars, boats, boat motors and recreational vehicles may be washed on any day, at any time when necessary, as long as a shut -off nozzle or other water efficient device is used. (Except as water restrictions may be imposed.) All electric, telephone, dock box, and cable will be paid by the slip tenant. 7. SAT.F. CAF PRTVATF VF.SSFT.S NAMF.T) TN TX)C'KTNC PFRMTTS- The following policies and procedures are, by reference, made a part of the docking permit for non - commercial vessels berthed at the Clearwater Municipal Marina and other City owned facilities authorized for non - commercial vessels. • Should the holder of this private dock permit decide to sell the vessel named in this application, the permit holder shall advise the Marine & Aviation Director or his designee in writing of his /her intent to sell the vessel prior to consummation of the sale. The permit holder shall further advise as to his /her intent to either retain the slip for another vessel to be acquired by the permit holder or to relinquish any claim to further use of the slip at the time of the sale. • If the tenant elects to retain the slip for another vessel, he will have 60 days from the date of sale to acquire a replacement vessel, titled in his name, and place it in the slip. A request for an extension of one 60 -day period shall be made in writing and may be approved at the Marine & Aviation Director's discretion. Failure to notify the Marine & Aviation Director of the need for a 60 -day extension will result in termination on the 61St day. The slip shall not be vacated for more than 120 days. On the 121St day, the slip will become available for a new tenant unless an extension is specifically authorized by the Marine & Aviation Director due to extenuating circumstances. Extenuating circumstances will be determined on a case -by -case basis, and will be at the discretion of the Marine & Aviation Director or his designee how to handle. During this period, the City will have the right to use the slip for transient dockage and the holder of the docking permit may not permit any other vessel not personally owned by him to be placed in the slip. • When the seller elects to retain the slip, the purchaser will have not more than four (4) weeks following the sale to remove the vessel from the slip. The purchaser will be charged the daily transient rate for any period the vessel is docked at the marina in excess of the four -week period. 8. ASSUMPTION OR RTSK- DISCLAIMER OF T.TARTT.TTY- TNDFMNTTY: This facility is to be used at the sole risk of the owner of said vessel, and the City shall not be liable or responsible for the care or protection of the vessel, including gear, equipment and contents, or for any loss of damage or whatever kind of nature to said vessel, howsoever occasioned. There is no guarantee or warranty of any kind as to the condition of the piers, catwalks, ramps, or mooring gear, nor shall the City be responsible for injuries to persons or property occurring thereon or for any reason whether herein specifically stated or not. Owner agrees to hold the City harmless and indemnify it of all loss, damage or liability or any kind claimed by reason of any act or failure to act on the part of the owner, his agents, employees, or guests in the use of mooring space for the vessel. In addition to the $500,000 liability insurance currently required of commercial tenants, both commercial and private tenants are required to carry a minimum $10,000 insurance coverage, with the City as additional insured, for any damage done by tenant vessels to City docks. A copy of this insurance, with the City as additional insured, is to be provided to the Marine & Aviation Director or his assistant, and kept current yearly. Failure to provide proof of insurance upon receipt of your dock permit will result in the dock permit being null and void and your forfeiting the use of the dock. If you fail to provide proof of insurance and your vessel is located in City dock facilities, you will Revised per City Council meeting 7 /15/04; incl 1st Addendum 2/15/05, 2nd Addendum 8/4/05, & 3.d Addendum 8/17/06 Page 4 .. :. , • If the tenant elects to retain the slip for another vessel, he will have 60 days from the date of sale to acquire a replacement vessel, titled in his name, and place it in the slip. A request for an extension of one 60 -day period shall be made in writing and may be approved at the Marine & Aviation Director's discretion. Failure to notify the Marine & Aviation Director of the need for a 60 -day extension will result in termination on the 61St day. The slip shall not be vacated for more than 120 days. On the 121St day, the slip will become available for a new tenant unless an extension is specifically authorized by the Marine & Aviation Director due to extenuating circumstances. Extenuating circumstances will be determined on a case -by -case basis, and will be at the discretion of the Marine & Aviation Director or his designee how to handle. During this period, the City will have the right to use the slip for transient dockage and the holder of the docking permit may not permit any other vessel not personally owned by him to be placed in the slip. • When the seller elects to retain the slip, the purchaser will have not more than four (4) weeks following the sale to remove the vessel from the slip. The purchaser will be charged the daily transient rate for any period the vessel is docked at the marina in excess of the four -week period. 8. ASSUMPTION OR RTSK- DISCLAIMER OF T.TARTT.TTY- TNDFMNTTY: This facility is to be used at the sole risk of the owner of said vessel, and the City shall not be liable or responsible for the care or protection of the vessel, including gear, equipment and contents, or for any loss of damage or whatever kind of nature to said vessel, howsoever occasioned. There is no guarantee or warranty of any kind as to the condition of the piers, catwalks, ramps, or mooring gear, nor shall the City be responsible for injuries to persons or property occurring thereon or for any reason whether herein specifically stated or not. Owner agrees to hold the City harmless and indemnify it of all loss, damage or liability or any kind claimed by reason of any act or failure to act on the part of the owner, his agents, employees, or guests in the use of mooring space for the vessel. In addition to the $500,000 liability insurance currently required of commercial tenants, both commercial and private tenants are required to carry a minimum $10,000 insurance coverage, with the City as additional insured, for any damage done by tenant vessels to City docks. A copy of this insurance, with the City as additional insured, is to be provided to the Marine & Aviation Director or his assistant, and kept current yearly. Failure to provide proof of insurance upon receipt of your dock permit will result in the dock permit being null and void and your forfeiting the use of the dock. If you fail to provide proof of insurance and your vessel is located in City dock facilities, you will Revised per City Council meeting 7 /15/04; incl 1st Addendum 2/15/05, 2nd Addendum 8/4/05, & 3.d Addendum 8/17/06 Page 4 remove it immediately. • 9. F.MFRGENC'TF.S. HT 1RRTC'ANFS OR THFR ACTS OF GOD: Each private vessel owner at this Marina will provide a Hurricane Plan to the Marine & Aviation Director or his designee. The Hurricane Plan should be a detailed list of action on what you will do with your vessel in the event of a hurricane. It is strongly recommended that the owner move the vessel from the Marina and anchor it in a hurricane hole or other safe location. If the owner plans on leaving the vessel at the Marina dock, he /she must include a drawing on Exhibit 1, showing how the vessel will be secured. The Marina will require all mooring lines to be at least doubled and that the' owners secure all-Ioose items and that a number of fenders be placed on the vessel to protect it and the City dock(s). Prior to the arrival of the storm, the City will video tape the condition of the docks and vessels. In the event the persons identified in Exhibit 1 cannot be contacted, Marina personnel will secure the vessel(s) as best they can to protect City docks. The Hurricane Plan must be included as Exhibit 1 of the Docking Permit. Undercurrent law, the boat owner has the right to leave his /her vessel at the Marina during a hurricane. The boat owner has a general obligation to keep his /her vessel in a secure condition at the dock and not do harm to docks or other boats. The standards of care are those of a reasonably prudent vessel owner. Marina policy regarding electric shutoff to the Fuel Dock and slips: If a high tide reaches the top of the lowest docks, we shut off the power to the lowest docks. If the tide reaches the bottom of the fuel dock, we shut off the power to all the docks, including the fuel dock pumps until it is safe to be turned back on. In keeping with the state statute as presented in House Bill 7175.3 effective 1 July 2006, the undersigned hereby informs you that in the event you fail to remove your vessel from the marina promptly (timeframe to be determined between the marina owner or operator and the vessel owner) after the issuance of a tropical storm or hurricane watch for Clearwater, Florida, under Florida law, the undersigned or his or her employees or agents are authorized to remove your vessel, if reasonable, from its slip or take any and all other reasonable actions deemed appropriate by the undersigned or his or her employees or agents in order to better secure your vessel and to protect marina property, private property, and the environment. You are further notified that you shall be charged a reasonable fee for any such action. A reasonable fee will be at least twenty -five ($25) for labor, plus the cost of materials and administration. (lines, billing, etc) A marina owner, operator, employee, or agent shall not be held liable for any damage incurred to a vessel from storms or hurricanes and is held harmless as a result of such actions. Nothing in this section may be construed to provide immunity to a marina operator, employee, or agent for any damage caused by intentional acts or negligence when removing or securing a vessel as permitted under this section. 10. T.TF.N CAN BOAT: The City shall have alien against the vessel named herein and its appurtenances for unpaid sums due for rental of space or other services, or from damages caused to docks or other City owned property by their vessel. 11. BRF.AC'H OF C QNDTTTQNS- Should breach of the conditions of this permit occur, the rights herein conferred shall terminate immediately and the City may remove or require the vessel be removed from the mooring space. The owner shall pay any costs incident thereto, and any un- expired rental shall be forfeited. 12. Waiver of any conditions by the City shall not be deemed to be a continuing waiver. 13. This permit, when fully executed will replace any docking permit previously issued to the vessel /owner. Applicant Date Marine & Aviation Director or designee Date Applicant Date Revised per City Council meeting 7/15/04; incl 1st Addendum 2/15/05, 2nd Addendum 8/4/05, & 3rd Addendum 8/17/06 Page 5 HURRICANE PLAN FOR VESSEL 1. Name of Person responsible Address 2. Name of Alternate Person Address EXHIBIT 1 • DATE Phone Phone The Marina Office will contact the person responsible for the Hurricane Plan or alternate when a Hurricane Watch is declared for the Clearwater Area. It is the responsibility of the owner of the vessel or alternate to make arrangements to either secure the vessel in the slip for the storm or to move it, as indicated in question 3 below. 3. Do you intend to leave your vessel in the slip at Clearwater Marina during a hurricane? Yes No (Check one) 4. If the answer to question 3 is no, please indicate where you will take the vessel or anchor it: 5. If the answer to question 3 is YES, please indicate in the space below exactly how you will secure the vessel in the slip, showing the size and amounts of moorings lines, amount and size of fenders and any other information you feel is necessary: (A drawing of the vessel and slip will satisfy this requirement) 6. It is the responsibility of the vessel owner and holder of the docking permit to insure that the Hurricane Plan for their vessel is kept up to date and current with the City of Clearwater, upon signing the docking permit. Applicant Date Applicant Date Marine & Aviation Director or designee Date Revised per City Council meeting 7/15/04; incl 1st Addendum 2/15/05, 2nd Addendum 8/4/05, & 31d Addendum 8/17/06 Page 6 Wells, Wayne From: Morris, William D. Sent: Thursday, October 09 2008 11:34 AM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: RE: Downtown. Marina - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Thursday, October 09, 2008.10:12 AM To: Morris, William D. Subject: Downtown Marina Bill - Additional questions. - 1. 1 believe the Downtown Marina is for the mooring of "personal" and we will not allow the leasing of slips for commercial vessels, such as charter (fishing) boats or to go see dolphins, etc. (like you do at the Beach. Marina). I am looking for language I can include in the staff report and as a condition of approval. (Steal what you want from below) 2. As to any ferry, the ferry boat will not be docked at the Downtown Marina, but we would have a landing for pick up /drop off. Correct? (Correct. Our intent we would look for a ferry to be based at the beach marina, we have several people on the commercial waiting list looking for an opportunity to bring forth such a business and base it at the beach in a current commercial slip. ) Holler if I missed somethingl Thanks, Bill M Wayne M. Wells, A/CP Planner III City of Clearwater 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, FL 33756 -5520 Phone: 727 - 562 -4504 Fax: 727 - 562 -4865 Wayne in answer to your questions I have both taken some language from our Municipal Marina Dock Permit and added the comments as we discussed. We have not yet drafted a permit for the downtown slips as they will be slightly different from the beach (Municipal) marina. I would expect as a condition of approval that we would be required to only allow Commercial vessels to Pick up and Drop off Customers For special events by "exception" with permission in advance from City Manager or his designee in this case the Harbormaster, in writing. The locations on the dock and times of day would be predetermined based on the event to minimize any adverse impact on any neighbors or marina tenants. These events would include but not be limited to Dinner Cruises, vessel charters, Fishing Rodeos as currently held as a Parks and Recreation special event at the existing "Drew Street Dock" and Jazz Holiday and 4th of July events currently coordinated as Special Events with Parks and Recreation. Major commercial marine related events where the community would benefit from having the customers park on the mainland and not on the beach would lessen the parking burden on the existing marina and free up parking spaces for beach business and tourist use. Such events would be looked upon favorably for Pick up and drop off Downtown provided there is appropriate space available and it does not disrupt the public peace and tranquility of the adjoining downtown neighbors and transient businesses. Note: While the Marina does not allow liveaboards, we do. allow people who rent slips to stay on their vessels a maximum of 8 nights a month so that they may enjoy the benefit of using their vessel during select weekends or when in conjunction with a family vacation or holiday. Separately Transient (Boaters who Ovel from marina to marina like many Ale travel on land from RV park to RV park) guests on average stay 3 days per visit at the marina based on historical data. Our current policy at the beach allows for transients to stay a Maximum of two months out of any one year. * * ** A condition of $1.2 million dollar Grant for this project was that we would limit stays to a maximum of 10 days at the Downtown facility. If there was not an excess demand (no reservations or waiting list for a transient space) we could "re- register" a boater for an additional 10 days and roll that over as often as we either had space available or desired to have them remain as transient tenants. The same rules for "Routine maintenance" as outlined below would apply to "transient guests ". They quite often pull in for some form of repair or have scheduled maintenance performed if they are on an extended passage (aka trip from point A to Point B). The below repeats some of the above and is taken verbatim from the current Municipal marina Dock permit. An of these would be acceptable conditions and most likely be in the dock permit or transient slip rental agreement. . The owner shall keep the vessel properly moored and dry within at all times. Routine maintenance and minor repair necessary for the preservation and seaworthiness of the vessel such as mechanical adjustment, minor painting, leak seals and rot prevention may be performed within the marina. Such repairs are generally considered to be those which: • Do not disturb the public peace and tranquility of any person aboard any vessel within the jurisdiction of the marina. • Do not contribute to a disorderly or unsightly appearance during the process of repair or maintenance. • Are capable of accomplishment with hand tools or certain portable power tools normally carried aboard the vessel. • Are confined to the vessel. • Do not pollute or put wastes in marina waters. • The private tenant shall not conduct commercial business under their private docking permit. • Living aboard non transient vessels is prohibited. Private tenants (those who rent slips) may stay aboard a total of 8 nights per month. • Swimming, diving, fishing and cast netting is prohibited from marina docks and seawalls. This project has a Downtown Fishing pier At the North end of the Downtown Marina. • No outside labor craftsmen may work on any vessels in the marina, without first obtaining permission from the Marine & Aviation Director or his designee's office. Such approval will only be given to those labor craftsman who show proof of liability insurance, have a valid City of Clearwater occupational license or have registered as a vendor with the City of Clearwater. The City may not be held liable for any damages or negligence from outside labor working on vessels within the marina. • Work may be allowed on a vessel if it causes no public nuisance to other marina tenants. Such work may be performed between the hours of 8 a.m. and 5 p.m. • It shall be unlawful for any person to willfully make, continue or cause to be made or continued any loud and raucous noise which because of its volume level, duration and character, annoys, disturbs, injures or endangers the comfort, heal , peace or safety of reasonable personsfordinary sensibilities within the limits of the City. This Development Code Section 3 -1508 includes engine exhaust. No refuse shall be thrown overboard at the marina. Garbage and trash shall be deposited in the dumpster or trash containers provided ashore. The Downtown boat slips are designed to be environmentally friendly facility, any consumable product or packaging material considered waste is to be taken off the dock to shore side trash receptacles. provided at the entrance to Both the North and South Sections of the Downtown Boat slips. 0 0 Wells, Wayne From: Morris, William D. Sent: Thursday, October 09, 2008 1:29 PM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: RE: Downtown Marina Wayne while looking at the managers "Viewpoint" memo to staff, I was reminded about the dock box, Dry Storage issue. Dry Storage and Launch. areas are two of the things that were specifically mentioned as not being allowed. Dry Storage in the Marina Trade is out of the water rack storage on shore. There is. an upcoming trade show on "Dry Stack Storage" this winter in Fort Lauderdale. It is not one that is a popular option with our city council and would not be appropriate for downtown. While we said we were not going to put in dock boxes, I would like to. not preclude the ability to do so as they are lower than the power pedestals and definitely lower than the vessels that will, be in the slips. and will not be a view issue. It would be good to require they all be the same style and share so as to present a uniform appearance at such time as we might chose to put them in. With its exposed location,. I would make every effort to keep trash cans off the docks. Those are unsightly, costly, and for our slip renters if they carry. items on the dock particularly food and beverage, they can take their trash off when they leave, we can write that in the lease. We will be working towards attracting transient boaters. We may have to put in our transient agreement that we will make rounds of the. dock plus greet them on arrival and deal with their initial trash disposal as a service. We have carts that we use for trash pick up in the marina now that would work well if we only serviced out transient guests but had our "tenants" carry off what they carry on. As with our existing marina, we have carts available for loan to boaters. Our current dock trash receptacles end up with Batteries, Oil cans, paint etc found in them or when we have locked lid with small side openings the items end up alongside. the trash containers. We have been somewhat successful in tracking down violators at the marina using our surveillance system. We will have a video system at the Downtown Marina as well if there are no cans to hide things in or behind, the trash quickly becomes obvious.. Anyway, enough on trash and Dock Boxes as. opposed to Dry Storage, Bill - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Thursday, October 09, 2008 10:12 AM To: Morris, William D. Subject: Downtown Manna Bill - Additional questions - 1. 1 believe the Downtown Marina is for the mooring of "personal' vessels, and we will not allow the leasing of slips for commercial vessels, such as charter (fishing) boats or to go see dolphins, etc. (like you do at the Beach Marina). I am looking for language I can include in the staff report and as a condition of approval. 2. As to any ferry, the ferry boat will not be docked at the Downtown Marina, but we would have a landing for pick up /drop off.. Correct? Wayne M. Wells, A/CP Planner III City of Clearwater 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, FL 33756 -5520 Phone: 727 - 562 -4504 Fax: 727 - 562 -4865 Page I. of 2 Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Tuesday, October 07, 2008 11:46 AM To: Chesney, Ed Subject: Replacement Sections for the Flexible Development Application Thanks. I will replace the pages in the case file. - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Chesney, Ed Sent: Tuesday, October 07, 2008 11:01 AM To: Wells, Wayne Cc: Tefft, Robert; Watkins, Sherry Subject: RE: Replacement Sections for the Flexible Development Application They got put into all the CDB applications that were in Sherry's care. If your copy was not among that group, then no. - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Tuesday, October 07, 2008 10:44 AM To: Chesney, Ed Cc: Tefft, Robert; Watkins, Sherry Subject: Replacement Sections for the Flexible Development Application Ed - This came in while I was on vacation. Did these pages get replaced in the application, such that my original package, along with the packages for the CDB, are correct? Wayne - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Claytor, Jessica [mailto:JCLAYTOR @WadeTrim.com] Sent: Tuesday, September 23, 2008 1:41 PM To: Wells, Wayne; Chesney, Ed; Morris, William D. Cc: Gildersleeve, David Subject: Replacement Sections for the Flexible Development Application These are the replacement sections for the Flexible Development Application. I used track changes so everyone could see the changes that were made per Bill Morris. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me or Dave Gildersleeve (happy birthday Dave). I hope everyone is having a wonderful day! Jessica J. Claytor Wade Trim, Inc. 10/7/2008 P ,i . • Page 2 of 2 8745 Henderson Road Suite 220, Renaissance 5 Tampa, FL 33634 Toll Free - 888.499.9624 Local - 813.882.8366 Fax - 813.884.5990 jclaytor @wadetrim.com www.wadetrim.com Meeting the client's needs and expectations, the first time, every time! 10/7/2008 • Page 1 of 1 Wells, Wayne From: Claytor, Jessica [JCLAYTOR @WadeTrim.com] Sent: * Tuesday, September 23, 2008 1:41 PM To: Wells, Wayne; Chesney, Ed; Morris, William D. Cc: Gildersleeve, David Subject: Replacement Sections for the Flexible Development Application These are the replacement sections for the Flexible Development Application. I used track changes so everyone could see the changes that were made per Bill Morris. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me or Dave Gildersleeve (happy birthday Dave). I hope everyone is having a wonderful day! Jessica J. Claytor Wade Trim, Inc. 8745 Henderson Road Suite 220, Renaissance 5 Tampa, FL 33634 Toll Free - 888.499.9624 Local - 813.882.8366 Fax - 813.884.5990 jclaytor@wadetrim.com www.wadetrim.com Meeting the client's needs and expectations, the first time, every time! 10/7/2008 FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION APPLICANT RESPONSES Section D. Written Submittal Requirements (Code Section 3 -19.A) 1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located: Comment: The boat slips have been designed to fit into the existing basin . generally located between the Pierce 100 Condominiums and the existing City owned dock located at the end of Drew Street, north and south of the new Memorial Causeway Bridge and west of the existing channel. The marina project as proposed represents an appropriate addition to the waterfront and complements the downtown redevelopment plan and neighboring properties. The scale and coverage of the docks is appropriate for this location. No new structures are proposed on the landside portion of the project other than the renovation of the existing structure at the end of Drew Street.. 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. Comment: The only properties directly abutting the proposed boat slips are the. Pierce 100 Condominiums on the south and the City- owned. Harborview Center and Coachman Park on the east, and Church of Scientology property on the north.. The Pierce 100 Condominiums are fully developed. The location of the boat slips in proximity to this high rise structure will not discourage the redevelopment should it ever occur. The Harborview Center and Coachman Park will likely be improved as part of the City's ongoing downtown and waterfront redevelopment efforts with the boat slips enhancing this ongoing redevelopment program. The proposed boat slips are a key component of this redevelopment plan and provide enhanced recreational and pedestrian opportunities along the currently underutilized waterfront. 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use. Comment: This project is part of a comprehensive strategy to protect, preserve and promote public access and activity on Clearwater's waterways and waterfront. The boat slips and upland improvements will positively affect the. downtown neighborhood by providing additional recreational and pedestrian opportunities for permanent residents and tourists visiting the area. Similarly, the project will improve the aesthetics of the currently underutilized waterfront. 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. The project has been designed to provide a convenient drop off area for boaters and sufficient city -owned parking already exists along the waterfront north and south of the Memorial Causeway Bridge to meet the project's parking. demands of one space per two boat slips. Additional overflow parking beyond this requirement exists along the waterfront proximate to the project, if needed. The existing parking lots will be improved with. new landscaping to comply with the current code and additional pedestrian ways will be provided. 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. Comment: The project represents a vital. component of the Downtown Redevelopment Plan. The character of the immediate vicinity is changing. positively with the. ongoing redevelopment activities in the downtown. The project has been thoughtfully designed to complement these ongoing . redevelopment activities. As a result, the community character of the -area will be clearly enhanced through this waterfront improvement project. 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts, on adjacent properties. Comment:. The boat slips are proposed to. be floating concrete structures which . are typically the most aesthetic pleasing and easiest to maintain. The docks are being designed to maximize views of the waterfront at both the pedestrian and bluff levels. Pedestrian access. and views of the waterfront will also be enhanced with the construction of the promenade located between the north and south basin overlooking the. proposed boat slips (a separate but related project). Additional landscaping and community art will be provided on the adjacent uplands enhancing the visual impact of the current waterfront area. No adverse acoustical and olfactory impacts are anticipated.. Hours of Operations for the Downtown Boat Slips; The Downtown Boat Slips will be staffed 24 hours a day, seven days a week. The staffing will consist of a Dock Master office staff manned by a Marine T-Fades Department personnel worker from 6:30 AM until 9 PM, and a Police Aide. Security Guard from 9 PM until 6:30 AM the next morning. The Downtown Boat slips. facility has several components which each will have unique operating hours. Those components are:. - The public downtown fishing pier - The public docks (connecting the fishing pier to the main walkway on the north side of the Promenade) - The rented boat slips - The rented transient side tie moorings - The Dock Master office The Downtown Fishing Pier is currently closed. As part of the Downtown Boat slips, once construction is complete and the docks are expanded, it will be open 24 hours a day. The public docks. The public docks are a free to the public amenity that will be open from 8 AM until 10 PM to keep their hours. in line with a recent city ordinance on public docks located in several locations throughout the city. • • Exceptions will be made. for City special events such as Jazz Holiday and fishing . tournaments held by other city departments. The Downtown. Boat slips will be. staffed 24 hours a day, seven days a week. The staffing will consist of a Dock Master office staff from 6:30 AM until 9 PM, and a Police. Aide security guard from 9 PM until 6:30 AM the next morning. The rented. boat slips will be accessible 24 hours a day by persons. renting slips or transient boating guests renting transient mooring space. There will be gates restricting access to these dock areas from general public access during the hours of 9 PM and 6:30 AM. The transient side tie moorings will be accessible under the same hours and process as the rented boat slips. The Dock Master office will be open to the public from 6:30 AM to 6:30 PM and will be staffed with Marine. Department personnel who can address both boat slip tenant concerns and the concerns of transient boaters. The facility manager will be onsite during those core hours. While the office staff will be at the facility until 9 PM, the hours from 6:30 PM until 9:00. PM will be for closing out paperwork, and providing security rounds of the facility. At 9 PM they transfer the shift over to the Police Aides for night security. The police aides make rounds from 9 PM until 6:30 AM at which time the Marine Department staff takes back over. Section E. Stormwater Plan Submittal Comment: The upland portion of the project has been determined to be exempt from FDEP stormwater requirements. A copy of the agency exemption letter is provided on the next page. 0 0 Section 3 -603. Marinas and marina facilities. A. All proposed activities including, but not limited to, fueling, pumping -out, chartering, living — aboard, launching, dry storage and the servicing of boats, motors and related marine equipment shall require approval in accordance with the provisions of the zoning district in which the marina or marina facility is proposed to be located. Comment: No fueling facilities will be provided as part of this project. Sewerage. pump -out facilities will be. provided within the north and south basins project. Live - aboards will not be allowed as part of the project. No dry storage is proposed as part of this project. No servicing of boats, motors and related. marine equipment will be permitted at the facility. B. For marina facilities located adjacent to residential districts, no fueling or launching facilities shall be located within 20 feet of the residential property line, and no fueling or servicing of boats shall occur at such marinas after 9:00 p.m. or before 6:00 a.m. .Comment: No fueling facilities are. proposed as part of this project.. No boat launching facilities are. proposed. No servicing of boats will occur after 9 PM or before 6 AM. C. No fuel storage facility or sanitary pump -out station holding tank shall be located over water. Comment: No fuel storage facility or sanitary pump -out station holding tank above. water are proposed as part of this project.. The sewerage pump -out facilities will be located,. designed. and permitted to meet state and local requirements. The precise locations have not been determined by would likely be located inside the project along the east/west docks paralleling the Promenade. The specific locations will be identified on the final construction plans. D. The marina shall pose no hazard or obstruction to navigation, as determined by the city harbormaster. Comment: The City's Harbor Master, Mr. William Morris, has determined the marina will pose no hazard or obstruction. to navigation. Please refer to previous comments above regarding navigation. E. The marina shall not adversely affect the environment, including both onshore and offshore natural resources. Comment: Please. refer to the numerous responses above addressing the marinas impact upon onshore and offshore natural resources. • • F. Adequate sanitary facilities shall be provided landside and a sanitary pump -out station shall be. provided and shall be available to marina users 24 hours a day. Comment: Sanitary pump -out facilities. will be provided in the north and south basins to accommodate the project. In addition, the City owns a sewerage pump -out vessel that could be utilized at the site if needed. The City has adequate sewerage treatment capacity to accommodate the project. An enclosed trash eenaPaster- receptacle will be. provided. at the Dock Master office building at the north end of the project as noted on the final slip layout plan.. Additionally, at least two trash collection facilities will be provided to serve the south basin. G. A manatee protection plan shall be provided and appropriate speed zone signs shall be posted to control boat speed for manatee protection. Comment: There is an existing slow speed minimum wake. zone currently in place between the Pierce 100 Condominium and Seminole Launch Ramp. with posted speeds to control boaters and protect manatees that might frequent the. area. A manatee protection plan will be developed as part of the state and federal permitting processes. H. Adequate spill containment areas shall be provided on the property. Comment: As noted, there are no fueling facilities proposed as part of this project. Similarly, sewage pump -out facilities are proposed as part of the. project in the north and south basins. In the event of a spill, the City has a containment process utilizing absorbent booms . and pads to contain spills. I. Design of the marina shall maintain existing tidal flushing and aquatic circulation patterns. Comment:. Tidal flusing studies and aquatic circulation pattern studies are not required as part of the City permitting process unless called for. The City does not issue dock permits, but relies upon the required permits and /or approvals of Pinellas County, FDEP and the USCOE, where these issues are thoroughly addressed. J. In the event of conflict between these standards and federal or state law or rules, the federal or state law or rules shall apply to the extent that these standards have been preempted; otherwise, the more stringent regulations shall apply. Comment: The City of Clearwater does not issue dock permits. Since the proposed boat slips are classified as "commercial docks" under the City's Land Development Code, Community Development Board. approval is required. Dock permits are issued by the Pinellas County Inland. Navigation Control Authority, Florida Department of Environmental Protection and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, all subsequent to Flexible Development Approval by the City.. Each of these permitting requirements is more stringent than the City's approval of this project. n �r Responses to DRC Comments of September 4, 2008 DRC Meeting General Engineering: 1 . General Note: DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. Comment: Concur. No action needed. Environmental: 1 . No issues. Fire: 1 . Show and label FDC locations and all associated Fire Hydrants. PRIOR TO CDB Comment: FDC locations and fire hydrants are shown on plan set. 2. Add general note to state intent to meet NFPA 303 requirements for standpipe systems. PRIOR TO CDB Comment: Note added to plan set Harbor Master: 1 . 8/26/08 - Per Bill Morris - I and my staff have reviewed this and the only thing we could find is not on a numbered page but near the front of the application Under Flexible Development Application Applicant Reponses. I am not sure if they are material to the application in that it concerns the Job classification we say we will put in the office on site and that has not been decided yet. C Section D. Written Submittal requirements (Code Section 3- :ra �-+ 19.A) Subparagraph 6. Where it speaks to Hours of Operation. ax w 90 It is worded that: " The Downtown Boat Slips, will be staffed 24 hours a day, Seven Days a week. The .staffing will consist of a Dock Master office Staff manned by a Marine Trades worker from 6:30 Am until 9 PM and a police Aide Security Guard from 9 PM until 6:30 AM the next morning." It should read: " The Downtown Boat Slips will be staffed 24 hours a day, Seven Days a week. The staffing will consist of a Dock Master office Staff from 6:30 Am until 9 PM and a police Aide Security Guard from 9 PM until 6:30 AM the next morning." similarly further down in the same section the last paragraph in Section 6 Says the office; it will be staffed with a Marine Facility Operator " and it should just say: "will be staffed with Marine Department personnel" and in the last line of that same paragraph the words: "Marine Facility Operator" Should be: "Marine Department staff' Comment: Revisions have been made to the text reflecting Mr. Morris's comments. Legal: 1 . No issues. Land Resources: 1 . No Issues. Landscaping: 1 . See Zoning comments. z Parks and Recreation: C= 1 . The Public Art and Design Impact Fee is due on this project, = pending transfer of impact fee funds. Please contact Chris Hubbard with any questions 562 -4837. ® Comment: Concur Cn . 2. No issues in regards to P &R impact fees - City project. Stormwater: 1 . The following shall be addressed prior to issuance of the Building Permit: 1. Sheet C -15: Provide invert elevations and slope of the proposed 18" RCP. Comment: Invert elevations have been provided on the revised plan sheet. 2. Sheet C -15: Provide a detail of the proposed gutter grate. Please show the connection of this grate with the adjacent structure and/or pavement in a larger scale.. Comment: Detail of proposed inlet has been provided on the revised plan sheet. 3. Sheet C -17: Provide a detail of proposed inlet type C. Comment: Detail has been provided on the revised plan sheet. 4. Sheet C -17: Provide invert elevations and slope of the proposed 15" RCPs Comment: Invert elevations have been provided on the revised plan sheet. 5. Sheet C -17: What type of manhole is proposed on the existing pipe? Will it be a doghouse type? Provide a detail of this proposed manhole. Comment: Please refer to revised plan sheet. General note: 1. -DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. Comment: Concur. � N ®y Solid Waste: 0� C) No Comments U Traffic Engineering: • I . The City's parallel parking dimensions are measured 8' wide by 23' long. If the parallel parking spaces along Cleveland Street and Drew Street are striped to 23' in length then the applicant can acquire more public parking spaces. Comment: The plan has been revised to reflect these dimensions and one additional parking space resulted. 2. Describe where and how boats will be unloaded and loaded with a boat trailer? Comment: There are no boat ramp facilities proposed with this project. The Seminole Boat Ramp north of the project site will continue to accommodate boat trailers. The above to be addressed prior to a Community Development Board (CDB) hearing. The following to be addressed prior to a Building Permit: 1. On page D -1 of the detail page see handicap parking sign, change the Florida Statute number to read "F.S. 318.18 ". Comment: The detail page has been revised to reflect this statute number. 3. Add to the projects detail sheet the F.D.O.T.'s truncated dome detail (Index 304 page 6 of 6). See link provided: htty://www.dot.state.fl.us/rddesign/rd/RTDS/08/304.pd Comment: Please refer to the General Notes where this information is provided. General Note(s): 1), Applicant shall comply with the current Transportation Impact Fee Ordinance and fee schedule and paid prior to a Certificate of Occupancy (C.O.). M Comment: Concur. ® 2) DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of 7. ® a Building Permit Application. �10 can Comment: Concur. t U Planning: 1 . Description of Request on Page 1 of the application needs to include all setback reductions (north and south) and width increase. The reduction to the required setback should be written "a reduction to. the side (south) setback from 197 to 43 feet ". Additionally, there should be a reduction to the side (north) setback as the existing dock, nor the proposed extension, does not appear to be 197 feet from the north property line extended. Finally, there may be a dock width increase, because we need to look at the TOTAL width of the docks (existing and proposed) from the north "end" to the south "end ", including the Memorial Bridge Causeway area (not an addition of 535'+ 503'). See other comments about dimensioning. Comment: The application form has been revised to reflect this wording and the appropriate setback requests. 2. Site Plans need to show the following: a. City property lines on the north and south Comment: Property lines are depicted on the final slip layout plan. b. A dimension as to the property width (it has been indicated as 1,970 feet but I have no drawings that show such dimension) The property width is 1,357 feet as reflected on the revised final slip layout plan. c. The property lines (see "a" above) need to be extended into the water Comment: Please refer to response above. d. Setback dimensions need to be indicated from the property lines (north and south) to the closest part of the docks (existing and proposed) on the north and south. On the north side there is the existing fishing pier that is included as part of the "dock" and there is an extension of such that also includes the floating dock that keeps boats out of the sea grass area; Comment: Please refer to the final slip layout plan prepared by Misener Marine. .-Do L r� 1 . Description of Request on Page 1 of the application needs to include all setback reductions (north and south) and width increase. The reduction to the required setback should be written "a reduction to. the side (south) setback from 197 to 43 feet ". Additionally, there should be a reduction to the side (north) setback as the existing dock, nor the proposed extension, does not appear to be 197 feet from the north property line extended. Finally, there may be a dock width increase, because we need to look at the TOTAL width of the docks (existing and proposed) from the north "end" to the south "end ", including the Memorial Bridge Causeway area (not an addition of 535'+ 503'). See other comments about dimensioning. Comment: The application form has been revised to reflect this wording and the appropriate setback requests. 2. Site Plans need to show the following: a. City property lines on the north and south Comment: Property lines are depicted on the final slip layout plan. b. A dimension as to the property width (it has been indicated as 1,970 feet but I have no drawings that show such dimension) The property width is 1,357 feet as reflected on the revised final slip layout plan. c. The property lines (see "a" above) need to be extended into the water Comment: Please refer to response above. d. Setback dimensions need to be indicated from the property lines (north and south) to the closest part of the docks (existing and proposed) on the north and south. On the north side there is the existing fishing pier that is included as part of the "dock" and there is an extension of such that also includes the floating dock that keeps boats out of the sea grass area; Comment: Please refer to the final slip layout plan prepared by Misener Marine. e. A dimension as to the dock width (that dimension between the setbacks requested); Comment: The dock width is 1,463.1 feet (i.e. 1,490 feet minus the two setbacks of 7.9 feet south setback and 19.0 feet north setback) f. A dimension as to the dock length (it has been indicated as 675 feet, but I have no drawings that show such dimension); and Comment: The Dock length is 1,490 feet at its widest point in the southern basin. Please refer to the final slip layout plan that shows this dimension. g. A dimension showing the width of the waterway that the docks are being located within (response to Section 3- 601.C.3.h.ii refers to 75% of the waterway width being 1,477 feet, but it is 75% of what dimension ?). Comment: The narrowest point of the Intracoastal Waterway at the Boat Slip site is 930 feet (see graphic on next page). The widest point of the Marina from the seawall to the outside edge of the attenuator docks paralleling the channel is 685 feet. Hence, the width of the Boat Slips is 73.7% of the width of the waterway. 3 . The first page of the application indicates the following parcel numbers are involved with this application: 16- 29 -15- 00000 -210- 0110; 16- 29 -15- 00000 - 210 -0100; 16- 29 -15- 43956- 000 -0010; 16- 29 -15- 76482 - 002 -0010; and 16- 29 -15- 20358- 001 -0040. After cross- referencing with the Pinellas County Property Appraiser's office, it does not appear that these are all of the parcel numbers for property involved with this project. For advertising purposes, I need to ensure all affect parcel numbers are listed on the Application. Please check with the Property Appraiser's office for LU all affected parcels. I have a map that indicates the properties Z ¢ listed above by parcel number that you may have to assist in 0 OR determining all affected parcel numbers. w Comment: The first page of the application. reflects all of the ® w z affected parcels. va 4. Need to complete the Affidavit to Authorize Agent (page 7 of the application) by including the appropriate information in Sections 1, 2,3 and 4. • 930Y 0 PERO-2- S 47 BOA7 ' INTERCOASTAL WA-7-E.-RWAY - I S !-I CL, LLI < C= o LU C%i LLJCl- 0 cn 930Y 0 PERO-2- S 47 BOA7 ' INTERCOASTAL WA-7-E.-RWAY - I S !-I Comment: The Affidavit to Authorize Agent has been revised as requested. 5 . Response to General Applicability criteria #2 - The boat slip project is also abuts the Scientology property on the north side of Drew Street. Revise response to include this adjacent property. Comment: The response has been revised as requested. 6. Response to General Applicability criteria #5 - In the 4th line, change "compliment" to "complement ". Comment: The response has been revised as requested. 7. Response to General Applicability criteria #6 - The response refers to "the public docks ". Am unclear where such "public docks" are located, as the Misener Marine plan does not indicate where the "public docks" are. Expand the written material in this criteria response and provide a plan as to where such "public docks" are located. Comment: The response has been expanded to clarify the location of the public docks. They are also depicted on the final slip layout plan. 8. City of Clearwater Land Ownership - This paragraph describes what submerged land the City owns. Can there be submitted a map showing what the City owns (even if 8.5 "x 11 " in size) with an indication (generally) where a lease will be necessary from the State? Comment: A graphic has been included (from the 2003 Marina Feasibility Study) depicting the general location of the state owned submerged lands. A legal description of this parcel will be submitted with the FDEP permit application. A lease will be executed with the State of Florida as part of Zt- 09 the FDEP permitting process for this parcel. <t 9. Project Description - The first paragraph mentions a "ferry landing ", but there is no plan that shows where that is to occur. �_ I� � Indicate such on plans. Additionally, suggest expanding the written material to discuss what is meant by a "ferry landing ", ® � 0 including where such a ferry might operate between other location(s), where such a ferry might dock (it probably won't operate 24 hours a day, so that it will be docked someplace just like any other boat), the operational characteristics of such a • • APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF STATE SOVEREIGN LANDS FOR WHICH A SUBMERGED LAND LEASE WILL BE REQUIRED LLI State t>! \ \ Sovereign \� X",\ i'` \ �\ Lands COACHMAN PARK. City Controlled Lands State Sovereign Lands Source: Clearwater Bayfront Marina Feasible Study, Wade Trim, Inc. September 15, 2003 ORIGINAL RECW1 EED S'%---P 16 2008 PLANNING MARTMEW CITY OF c Algwx ferry, the positives and negatives for having such a ferry landing, how it relates to upland improvements (including the drop off area and parking), etc. Comment: The proposed ferry landing will be located in the north basin at a location to be determined. At this juncture, the precise size and /or type of ferry vessel has not been determined, nor its hours of operation, hence its location and docking needs have not been determined. Notwithstanding, its location will not adversely impact boater safety within or outside of the project footprint depicted on the final slip layout plan. 10. Responses to Section 3- 601.C.3.a.ii) - The response needs to comment only on the docks and not the dock master building or other upland improvements. It is important to note in the response that this is a publicly owned marina, which may not be consistent with docks on adjacent properties, but is also as generally approved by the voters in 2007. Comment: Reference to the dock master building and other upland improvements has been deleted. It is important to note that this is a municipal marina which is inherently different than nearby residential docks. Its upscale design utilizing floating concrete docks represents a purposeful effort to complement the surrounding area and serve as a catalyst project for further redevelopment in the general area. This project was also approved by city -wide referendum. 11 . Responses to Section 3- 601.C.3.b - Need to include how the design of the docks will not inhibit boat traffic within the channel of the Intracoastal Waterway and how the dock design will provide a defined location for transient slips for events at Coachman Park. Comment: This section has been revised to further discuss LU < how the docks will not inhibit boat traffic. 59 12. Responses to Section 3- 601.C.3.c - There is no plan that shows 0 where the channel of the Intracoastal Waterway is located, CL. especially in proximity to the proposed marina. Include such. Cn Comment: The centerline of the channel is shown on the final slip layout plan. t 13 . Responses to Section 3- 601.C.3.d.i) - The slip layout plan by Misener has been referenced as to the location of sea grass beds. However, the shading of such beds is not called out as "sea grass beds" so that it is clear as to what the shading depicts. In the South. Basin, what will prevent boaters from traveling eastward closer to the seawall, and into the sea grass bed, east of Dock D? Will there be any signs restricting access to this eastern area? Comment: The final slip layout plan has been revised to depict the sea grass beds. Signage will be placed adjacent to Dock D in the southern basin restricting access to the sea grass area. 14 . Responses to Section 3- 601.C.3.e.i) - Part of the criteria was left out when typed (add in). Also, the response in the last paragraph needs to address the one -foot minimum clearance distance between the bottom of the vessel and the bottom of the water body at mean or ordinary low water. Comment: The criteria has been inserted as requested. The water depth under Dock D (the dock located in the shallowest water) is 4.9 feet at mean low tide which provides for more than one -foot minimum clearance distance between the bottom of the vessel and the bottom of the water body at mean low. It is envisioned that these slips will accommodate the smallest vessels 15. Responses to Section 3- 601.C.3.h.i) - Need to also deal with any setback reduction on the north side. For both the north and south side setback reductions, need to provide justification for such reductions. Comment: Please refer to the revised response to this section. 16 . Responses to Section 3- 601.C.3.h.ii) - Need to also indicate that LU the length of the docks is restricted by the channel of the C= Intracoastal Waterway. Comment: Please refer to the revised response to this section. 17. Responses to Section 3- 601.C.3.h.iii) - See other comments needing dimensions on plans showing the waterfront width C� (indicated as 1,970 feet in width). Width of the dock must be measured from the northernmost tip of the existing fishing pier (closest to the seawall) in the. North Basin to the southernmost tip of the wave attenuator on the south side of Dock A in the South Basin. You cannot take out for the Memorial Causeway Bridge. It appears that the width will exceed the 75% rule. Will need to determine the actual width, include such in the request and provide justification for such increase in width. Comment: The width of the dock measured from the northernmost tip of the existing fishing pier in the North basin to the southernmost tip of the wave attenuator on the south side of Dock A in the South basin is 1,490 feet. The irregular shape of the basin and presence of the Memorial Causeway Bridge bisecting the two basins creates a challenging, yet appropriate, site for a boat slip project. At FDOT's request approximately ten (10) slips were omitted from the original plan resulting in the 129 slips proposed. Strict enforcement of the 75% rule would result in the loss of a significant number of slips. Variance from this provision is appropriate given the demand for wet slips, the slow minimum wake zone abutting the proposed docks, the catalytic nature of the project on surrounding redevelopment activities as evidenced by the positive voter referendum. Additionally, as noted elsewhere in this application the project as designed will not adversely affect boater safety in the area. 18. Responses to Section 3- 601.C.3.i - This is a publicly owned facility. Need to provide a response. Comment: The proposed boat slips will be publicly owned and operated. No roof structures or vertical walls are proposed. 19 . Response to Section 3 -603.A - Response states that sewerage pump out facilities will be provided. Unclear if this is a change from prior Committee meetings, as I do not recollect such facility to be provided. If to be provided, show where such will occur and the operational aspects of such. C'4 Comment: Sewerage pump out facilities will be provided at single locations in both the north and south basins. The aX precise location has not been determined but would likely be uj .� located inside the project generally along the east /west docks paralleling the Promenade. The specific locations will be. identified on the final construction plans. • 1 7-J 20 . Response to Section 3 -603.13 - Need to address all aspects of the criteria (only fueling addressed). Additionally, the proposed marina is not adjacent to residentially zoned property. Comment: No fueling facilities are proposed, No boat launching facilities are proposed. No servicing of boats will occur after 9:00 p.m. or before 6:00 a.m. 21 . Response to Section 3 -603.0 - Response appears inconsistent with that in the Response to Section 3- 603.A, where sewerage pump out is proposed. Need to expound and clarify. Comment: No fuel storage facility is proposed as part of the project. The sewerage pump out facilities will be located, designed and permitted to meet state and local requirements. There will be no above water pump out holding tanks. 22 . Response to Section 3 -603Y - Did not address "adequate sanitary facilities" landside (at the dock master building). Comment: An enclosed dumpster facility will be provided at the Dock Master office building at the north end of the project as noted on the final slip layout plan. Additionally, at least two trash collection facilities will be provided to serve the south basin. 23. Response to Section 3 -603. beyond that other agencies demonstrate adequate tidal patterns. - Need to provide a response, approval processes will require flushing and aquatic circulation Tidal flushing studies and aquatic circulation pattern studies are not required as part of the local permitting process. The City's does not issue dock permits but relies upon the required permits and /or approvals by Pinellas County, the �. Florida Department of Environmental Protection, and the U U.S. Army Corps of Engineers where these issues are thoroughly .addressed. �a C= o � 24. Dock master building - There needs to be a discussion in the 0 LL. application material as to what functions will occur at this w building (dock master offices, laundry, restroom and showers). Need to discuss (possibly if floor plans are available [existing versus proposed.] to assist visually) the existing building, how it has been used, how it will be renovated and expanded and how it will function. Comment: The Dock Master building has been utilized in the past as a ticketing facility when the ferry operation that used to launch from the adjoining dock. The building will be used as a Dock Master's office staffed by Marine Department staff. The Downtown Boat Slips will be staffed 24 hours a day, seven days a week. Staffing will consist of Marine Department personnel from 6:30 a.m. until 9:00 p.m. and a police Aide Security Guard from 9:00 p.m. until 6:30 a.m. The building will also provide ADA accessible shower and laundry facilities for boaters utilizing the marina. The building has and will continue to be renovated and upgraded to serve the proposed boat slip project. A floor plan has been included in this Flexible Development application along with color architectural renderings of the structure. 25. Sheet C -10 - Wheel stops are required for the eastern parking spaces in the southern parking lot (Section 3- 1204.D). Because the western parking spaces are flush with the sidewalk, it is highly recommended to install wheel stops to prevent vehicle encroaching the sidewalk and traveling into the water (same comment is applicable to the parking spaces on the west side of the northern parking lot on Sheets C -11 and C -12). Comment: Wheel stops have been added as requested and noted on the referenced Sheets. 26. Sheets C -2, C -5, C -6, C -9, C -10, C -13, C -14, C -17, C -18, C -21, E -1 & E -4 - Show property lines (there is private property to the west and to the north). Comment: Property lines are shown as requested. 27. Sheets C -2, C -4, C -5, C -6, C -8 & C -9 - Remove proposed boat 29. Sheet C -11 - Dimension the width of the landscape area between the northern parking lot and street curb for parallel parking spaces. slips from the 'Existing Site Plan" and "Demolition Plan" sheets. C A Comment: The boat slips have been removed from the "Existing Site Plan" and "Demolition Plan ". % �—+ 28. Sheet C -11 - Dimension the width of the sidewalk west of the northern parking lot. Comment: Dimension is now shown on Sheet C -11. 29. Sheet C -11 - Dimension the width of the landscape area between the northern parking lot and street curb for parallel parking spaces. • • Comment: Dimension is now shown on Sheet C -11. 30. Sheet C -11 - Parking spaces have been dimensioned as nine -feet wide typically with an overall dimension of 36'. It was previously recommended to make the landscape island on the south side of the handicap parking space 0.9 feet larger. Instead, the HC space has been widened to 13 feet. Reduce the HC space to 12 feet and convert the 0.9 or 1 -foot to landscaping as previously requested. Comment: Completed as requested. 31 . Sheets C -11 & C -12 - It appears that the concrete curb proposed on the west side of the parking spaces in the northern parking lot on the 90% plans has been removed. As such, it appears, based on the ME indicated on Sheets C -15 and C -16, that there should be no need for a handicap ramp for the handicap space in the western sidewalk. Comment: Revision completed. 32. Sheet C -12 - Indicate the width of the sidewalk along the seawall. Comment: Width indicated as requested. 33 . Sheet C -12 - Indicate the width of the driveway into the northern parking lot. Comment: Width indicated as requested. 34. Sheet C -13 - It was previously recommended to install a flagpole in front of the harbormaster building. If to be provided, need to show location on this sheet (need to also indicate proposed height of flagpole). Comment: Revisions made to referenced Sheets as requested. M Comment: The location of the flagpole has been indicated in Sheet C -13. The height of the pole will not exceed 40 feet. Uj Nf 35 . Sheets C -18, C -19 and C -20 - Code requires interior landscaping at a rate of 10% of the vehicular use area of these two parking lots, with one shade tree per 150 square feet of interior landscape area (two accent trees = one shade tree, planted relatively close to each other; three palms = one shade tree, planted in a cluster of three). Revise to provide the required number of trees. Comment: Revisions made to referenced Sheets as requested. I IL t 36. Sheets C -18 and C -19 - Fire truck access from north end of southern parking lot to Cleveland Street - How will the fire truck driver know the location of the geoweb so as to stay on the access area? Will it be outlined somehow so the driver knows the path? Is the sidewalk along Cleveland Street being designed to withstand the weight of the fire truck? Comment: Trees have been added to define the geoweb area for fire truck access. Yes, the sidewalk along Cleveland Street is designed to withstand the weight of the fire truck. 37. Sheets C -19 and C -20 - Landscape islands in the northern parking lot are large enough for shade trees to be planted. Alternately, two accent trees or three palms are required in the islands. Comment: Referenced sheets have been revised as requested. 38 . Sheet D -6 — Move to be Sheet C -22 Comment: All landscape plans are labeled with "L" prefix. 39. Sheet D -6 (should be C -22) - Revise the Landscape Schedule for the following: a. Indicate for the LI, L12 and LJ that they must be a minimum of 2" caliper at time of planting; and b. Indicate there must be a rain sensor for the irrigation system. Comment: Revisions made as requested. 40 . To be clear, is the electric service for the bollard lights and the parking lot lights for the southern parking lot being placed underground? Comment: Yes. 41. Need a detail for the compactor dumpster enclosure. Unclear -T e how one gets into the dumpster enclosure to dump the trash. Unclear of the exterior material and color of the dumpster LU 90 C-4 enclosure, including the gates. ® C� eg 0 Comment: A standard detail has been provided for the c dumpster. The exterior material and color of the enclosure will compliment the Dock Master building. „ Pagel of 2 Wells, Wayne From: Gildersleeve, David [DGILDERSLEEVE @WadeTrim.com] Sent: Sunday, September 14, 2008 10:02 PM To:. Chesney, Ed Cc:. Rice, Michael; O'Brien, Richard; Wells,. Wayne;. Callahan, Michael Subject: Downtown boat slips Ed, We completed the updated. Flexible Development Application over the weekend which will be delivered to you on Monday morning for a quick review and attaching page 7. of the. Flexible. Development Application. Form (i.e. the revised signature page which you were going to complete). The application package is held to gether with a binder clip. as opposed. to 3 -ring binder. I believe Planning Department prefers it this way.. There. are several additional attachments. to this package that were not in the earlier package::. • Revised. Misener Final. Slip. Plan with Tom Mahoney. and Wade Trim dimensions and descriptions responding to the DRC comments. • Responses to the DRC comments (located. at the end of the. package). • Graphic showing the general location of the area subject to a submerged land lease (pulled from 2003 Feasibility Study prepred by Wade. Trim) • Graphic showing the shortest distance to land across the Intracoastal. Waterway at the boat slip. site. (930 feet).. It is part of the DRC comments.. • Revised. Upland Development Plan Set. After inserting the revised page 7,. can you drop the application off across the hall to Wayne. Wells by noon.. will be in our Bay. City, office on Monday, but feel free to call me on my cell if you have any questions.. If for some reason you cannot get me on my cell, the Bay City office number is 989 - 686 - 3100.. They can page me. Thanks. David B. Gildersleeve n la Senior Vice. President Wade- Trim, Inc. 1200 Ridgefield. Blvd.. Suite 145. Asheville, NC 28803. Tele: 828 - 665 -1288 Fax: 828- 665 -9566. Cell:. 813- 309 -0598. 9/15/2008 0 0 Page 2 of 2 dgildersleeve wadetrim.com. 8745 Henderson Road, Suite 220 Tampa, FL 33634 Tele: 813-882-8366. Fax: 813 - 884 -5990 Cell: 813- 309 -0598 dgildersleeve @wadetrim.com 9/15/2008 Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Saturday, September 06, 2008.4:23 PM To: Chesney, Ed Subject: Final 9.4.08 DRC. Comments - 210 Drew. Street MENI Final 9.4.08 C Action Agend Wayne M. Wells, A/CP Planner. III City of Clearwater 100 South Myrtle. Avenue Clearwater,. FL 33756 -5520 Phone:. 727 - 562 -4504 Fax: 727- 562 -4865 Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Tuesday, September 02, 2008 7:06 PM To: Quillen, Michael Cc: Chesney, Ed Subject: FLD2008- 08026, 210 Drew Street Mike /Ed - Attached are the Draft DRC Comments for the September 4, 2008, DRC meeting, to be held at 9:00 am in Room 216 of the Planning Department offices. Wayne. M. Wells, AICP Planner III City of Clearwater 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, FL 33756 -5520 Phone: 727 - 562 -4504 Fax: 727 - 562 -4865 m Draft 9.4.08 C Action Agend 0 Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Tuesday, September 02, 2008 3:56 PM To: Chesney, Ed Subject: Downtown Boat Slips Dimensions need to be on plans. - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Chesney, Ed Sent: Tuesday, September 02, 2008 3:36 PM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: Downtown Boat Slips Wayne, :7 Here are the distances we talked about using the_Misener Figure as reference, as calculated in ACAD by Tom Mahony. 1. Projecting the P -100 property line in the south & the Scientology property line in the north, the distance between the two lines is 1517'. 2. From the existing Drew Street dock to the Scientology property, the distance is 52' 3. From the P -100 projected line to the wave attenuator on the south, the distance is 7.7' 4 We took three distances from the seawall westward, in the north 356', center of the project at the promenade 427' and in the south the greatest distance was 757'. These are the distances from the seawall to the outside of the wave attenuator. Tom can create a figure if you need one. Ed Chesney, P.E. Environmental Manager City of Clearwater 100 South Myrtle Ave., #220 Clearwater, FL. 33756 -5520 Phone: 727 - 562 -4742 Fax: 727- 562 -4755 LL °� mater U August 07, 2008 Michael Quillen Po Box 4748 Clearwater, F133758 -4748 OCITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE: (727) 562 -4567 FAX: (727) 562 -4576 W W W.MYCLEARWATER. C OM VIA FAX: 727 -562 -4.755 RE: FLD2008 -08026 -- 210 DREW ST -- Letter of Completeness Dear Michael Quillen: The Planning Staff has entered your application into the Department's filing system and assigned the case number: FLD2008- 08026. After a preliminary review of the submitted documents, staff has determined that the application is complete. The Development Review Committee (DRC) will review the application for sufficiency on September 04, 2008, in the Planning Department conference room - Room 216 - on the second floor of 'the iviunicipa1 Services Building. The building is located at 100 South Myrtle Avenue in downtown Clearwater. You will be contacted by the Planning Department's Administrative Analyst within one week prior to the meeting date for the approximate time that your case will be reviewed. You or your representative (as applicable) must be present to answer any questions that the DRC may have regarding your application. Additional comments may be generated by the DRC at the time of the meeting. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at 727 -562 -4504 or Wayne.Wells@myclearwater.com. Sincerely yours, ,-,L M. Wa Zwells, AICP Planner III Letter of Completeness - FLD2008 -08026 - 210 DREW ST • Wells, Wayne From: FOWLERARCH @aol.com Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2007 4:41 PM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: Dock Master Building • Page 1 of 1 Wayne, We have been retained by the city to design the expansion to the existing Dock Master building at Coachman Park, for the new marina project. This expansion will be approximately 300 s.f. and will be within the "footprint' of the existing building and existing canopy. Our question is: Will the city require us to make application through the Development Review Committee (DRC), and /or the Community Development Board (CDB)? Please feel free to call our office should you have any questions or comments.... thanks. Steve Fowler 449 -2021 Get a sneak peek of the all -new AOL.com. 2/9/2009 Vl - 4, • Wells, Wayne From: Morris, William D. 0 Sent: Thursday, April 12, 2007 10:28 AM To: 'Gildersleeve, David'; Wells, Wayne; Downes, Tom; Wood, Jim; Carnley, Rick Cc: Chesney, Ed; Delk, Michael; Quillen, Michael Subject: RE: Downtown Boat Slips - Boundary Survey Page 1 of 2 David; I spoke with Tom Downes, Jim Wood and Rick Carnley and they have the Drew Street Dock Building renovations on their plate.and would like to have one member (Jim Wood) included in future planning meetings to make sure they are on track with the timing and budget. The will need a copy of the revised Gant chart. We discussed at our recent meeting the phasing of the project due to FEMA requirements and that brought up the need to do an annual appraisal on the building to get the highest value to do the most work. Our building official Kevin Garriot has given us the guidance on what we can and can't do. There are items such as the exterior ADA access ramps can be done and not count against the FEMA Spending limits but would add value to the structure. - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Gildersleeve, David [ mailto :DGILDERSLEEVE @WadeTrim.com]. Sent: Tuesday, April 10, 2007 1:49 PM To: Wells, Wayne; Rice, Scott Cc: Chesney,. Ed;, Morris, William D.;. Irwin, Rod;. Grant, Lee;. Brzezinski, Thomas;. Thompson, Neil;. Clayton, Gina; Delk, Michael Subject: RE: Downtown Boat Slips - Boundary Survey. Thanks Wayne. I am going to plot this on an aerial and shoot to you for a quick review before giving to surveyor. In touch Dave From:. Wayne.Wells @myClearwater.com [ mailto :Wayne.Wells @myClearwater.com] Sent:. Tuesday, April 10, 2007 12:06 PM. To: Gildersleeve, David; Scott.Rice @myC[earwater.com. Cc: Ed. Chesney@ myClea rwater.com;. William .Morris @myClearwater.com;. rod. irwin@ MyClea rwater.com; Grant, Lee; Brzezinski,. Thomas; neil.thompson @MyClearwater.com; Gina.Clayton @myClearwater.com; michael.delk @MyClearwater.com Subject: RE:. Downtown Boat Slips -. Boundary Survey Dave - Scott Rice and I have talked about the necessary boundary survey. North of Cleveland Street, we need at least everything west of and south of Drew Street, basically an extension of the east/west Drew Street south and west of the north /south Drew Street along the seawall showing the harbormaster building and the fishing pier area and the parking area between Drew Street and the seawall (north of Cleveland Street). The survey should also be showing the area where the promenade will be. South of Cleveland Street, we need to show the parking lot adjacent to the seawall all the way down to Pierce Street. The survey may need to at least go over to (showing the western edge of) the tennis court and the other parking lot west of City Hall (which will not be improved as part of the boat slip project). Hope this defines the upland area of the survey needed for the FLD case. If you have any questions, feel free to email or call me. We should also get together to talk about the width, length and setbacks of the proposed docks. 2/9/2009 1:4 Page 2 of 2 Wayne - - - -- Original Message - - - - -. From: Gildersleeve, David [ mailto :DGILDERSLEEVE @WadeTrim.com] Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2007 3:01 PM To:. Wells, Wayne; Rice, Scott Cc: Chesney, Ed;. Morris, William D.; Irwin,. Rod; Grant, Lee; Brzezinski, Thomas; Gildersleeve, . David Subject: Downtown Boat Slips - Boundary Survey Gentleman, As we move into this next phase of the boat slip project, we will need to prepare a boundary survey for environmental permitting, and of course, City permitting ( as well as any submerged land lease descriptions). Recognizing this project will go before the CDB, can you provide the specific boundary survey requirements /information that must accompany the application through the review process. Please copy Ed Chesney with the information. Thanks. David. B. Gildersleeve Executive Vice President 8745 Henderson Road Suite 220, Renaissance 5 Tampa, FL 33634 Tele: 813- 882 -8366 Cell: 813- 309 -0598 dgildersleeve @wadetrim.com 2/9/2009 Wells, Wayne 0 0 From: Delk, Michael Sent: Wednesday, September 22, 2010 11:47 AM To: Wells, Wayne Cc: Tefft, Robert Subject: FW: 2nd dumpster Attachments: image001.png Wayne — I want you and Robert to look at this from a site plan stand point and the three of us to get together and discuss it. I need to be prepared for the meeting. Michael From: Horne, William Sent: Wednesday, September 22, 2010 11:41 AM To: Irwin, Rod; Bruch, Tracey; Chesney, Ed; Delk, Michael; Morris, William D.; Quillen, Michael Cc: Wills, Anne; Silverboard, Jill Subject: RE: 2nd dumpster Bill Horne, ICMA -CM City Manager Clearwater, FL (727) 562 -4046 From: Irwin, Rod Sent: Wednesday, September 22, 2010 11:27 AM To: Bruch, Tracey; Chesney, Ed; Delk, Michael; Morris, William D.; Quillen, Michael Cc: Wills, Anne Subject: FW: 2nd dumpster To all, There is a need for a dumpster proximate to the South BS basin that was unforeseen at the time plans were developed. We are encountering both tenant complaints, and, more importantly, sanitation /disposal issues. I discussed with the CM and he agrees that we need to come up with a reasonable solution for a circumstance that we didn't anticipate when the project was conceived /planned. He would like all involved to develop a recommended solution that meets the needs of the BS operation , that is consistent with sanitation expectations for a BS of this quality, and is the least intrusive possible. Use of the dumpster a the back of the City hall is probably too far to be practical. I personally think use of the last parking space in the South lot is the least intrusive solution, when screening and enclosure is include. I will have Anne Wills set a meeting to discuss options after my return on October 7th. Please discuss in the meantime and hopefully we can come up with a good resolution within the above parameters. However, if a solution acceptable to all is identified in the meantime, so much the better. Thanks! �O - , 4,� 0 0 'a• From: Morris, William D. Sent: Wednesday, September 22, 2010 10:20 AM To: Wills, Anne Subject: Fw: 2nd dumpster Anne, please print and fyi for Rod, he and I discussed this AM an this came in after I left the office. Thanks, Bill M From: Chesney, Ed To: Morris, William D.; Wills, Gordon Sent: Wed Sep 22 09:01:16 2010 Subject: 2nd dumpster I talked with Tracey Bruch about the possibility of a dumpster in the south lot. She said no, as we would not allow that anywhere by anyone else in the city. I don't think Planning and Zoning would allow it either. Tracey thought that there may be a dumpster (or has been in the past) in the lot behind city hall? If there is, it's a closer haul... Ed Chesney, P.E. Environmental Manager City of Clearwater 100 S. Myrtle Ave. #220 Clearwater, FL. 33756 -5520 727 - 562 -4742 http: / /www.myclearwater.com /green Wells, Wayne From: Chesney, Ed Sent: Thursday, July 30, 2009 2:13 PM To: Quillen, Michael; Morris, William D.; Yellin, Catherine; Mahony, Laura; Dougall- Sides, Leslie; kmarsh @misenermarine.com; Irwin, Rod; Lopez, Perry; Wells, Wayne; Eckman, Alice Subject: FDEP Permit and Approved Permit Plans - Downtown Boat Slips Attachments: fdep_PERMIT.pdf; fdep_PERMIT_plans.pdf For your files /review Ed Chesney, P.E. Environmental Manager City of Clearwater 100 S. Myrtle Ave. #220 Clearwater, FL. 33756 -5520 727 - 562 -4742 • Florida Department of Environmental Protection 161 K,dl : 13t51 M.,)rth ldvco);n Pil,kMay Mkh,wl kv, "'111 'N'ti"Pic 7e race. Floridz, 33637-0926 Scc1:1J1,V CONSOLIDATEDRESOURCE PERMIT AND SOVERFIGN SUBMERGED LAND18, AUTBORIZATION PERM,1T'r.EE/AUTH0R1ZED ENTITY: William N-1orris Harbor Master City of Clearwater 25 Causeway.131vol. Clearwater, FL 33767 AGENT- Jason D, Ever( Dial Cordy & Associates, Inc. 490 Osceola Ave. Jacksonville Beach. Ff., 32250 Permit.,'Nuthorization Number: 52-0265938-0012 Date of issue: Expiration Date of Construction Phase: Co un ty: Pin ell as JUL' 2 7 20141 Pr(�ject: To construct a new public marina with 50,496 square feet of floating docks, for a total of 126 permanent slips and 40 transient .aide -tie mooring areas. This project requires anIndividual Permit. The Department has the authority to issue this permit per the fblioxvina referwices- hart IV of Chapter 373, Florida Statutes (F.S.) Chapter 62-330 and 62-343. Florida Administrative Code (F.A.C.) Opuratin,g Agreements with the water management districts in Chapter 62-113. F.A.C. 'Phis pennit also constitute.,; a finding ofconsistency with Florida's Coastal Zone Management Program, as required by Section 307 of the Coastal Management Act. This permit also constitutes certification ofcompliance with water quality standards under Section 401 of the Clean Water Act, ' 33 U.S.0 1341, 'this activity also requires a proprietary authorization, as the activity is located on sovereign submerged lands owned by the Board of Tnistecs of the Internal Improvement Trust Fund, pursuant to Article X. Section I I of the Florida Constitution, and Sections 253.002 and 2.53.77, F.S. The activity is not exempt from the need. to obtain a proprietary authorization. The Department has the responsibility to review and take final action on this request for proprietary authorization in accordance with Section .18- 21.0051, F.A.C., and the operating agreements executed between the Department and the water nianagernent districts, as referenced in Chapter 62- 1.13, F.A.C. In addition to the above, this propriet, yaUth0ri7Ati0n has been reviewed in accordance with Chapier'253 and Chapter 258, F.S,, Chapter 13-20, Chapter 18-21., and Section 62-343.075., F,A.C, and the policies of the Board of Trustees. Is 0 0 As staff to the Board of Trustees., the Departnient has reviewed the activity described below, and has deterri-diied the activity requires a lease for the use of those lands, pursuant to Chapter 253,77, F.S. The Department intends to issue the lease., subject to the required fees and conditions. The .final docurrients.reqUired to execute the lease will be sent to the Division of State Lands. The Department intends to issue the lease, upon satisfactory execution of Those documents. You may not beo-in construction of this aetivJ[4, on state-owned, sovereign submerged lands until the lease has been executed to the satisfaction of the Department. This permit and authorization to use sovercipi submerged Imids i, sub - iect to the linaits, coriditions, and locatiqns of work- shown in the attached drawings, and is also subject to the attached 25 .general conditions and 40 specific conditions, which are a binding part of this permit and authorization. You are advised to read and tuider.stand. these drawings and conditions prior to ccattimencii-ig, the authorized activities, and to ensure the work- is conducted in conformance with all the terms, conditions, and dra-,%,ines. If vou are utilizin- a contractor, the contractor also should read and understand these drawings and conditions prior to commencing the authorized activities. 'Failure to comply with all drawings and conditions shall constitute grounds for revocation of the pertnit and. appropriate enforcement action. Operation of the fiacilityis not authorized except when determined to be in conforriiance with all applicable rules and the general and specific conditions of this permit and intent to grant state lands autborization.as specifically described below. You are hereby advised that authorizations also may be required by other federal, state, and local entities. This authorization does not relie-v-e you from the requirements to obtain all other required pe-itnits and authorizations. SPGP REVfEW - NOT APPROVED A copy of this authori7Aitioii has also been sent to theU,S. Anny Corps of Engineers (USACOE) for review. The USACOE may require a separate pern-iit. Failure to obtain this authorization prior to construction could subject you to enforcement action by that agency. ACTIVITY DESCRIPTION- 'rhe proposed project is to construct a new 50,496-squarc4bot docking facility with 126 permanent boat blips, 24 temporary side-tic mooring areas with nioorint limited to 10 days, and 16 temporary side-tic moonng areas with no overnight mooing, for public use within. ClearwaterEarbor, a Class III Outstanding Florida Waterbody, and part of thePhiellas County Aquatic Preserve. Currently there is art existing fishing pier and a small dock with one slip located within the project area, The manna is owned by the City of Cleanvater and will be 100% open to the public on a first come first served basis, The facility will not allow liveaboards. flowever, two sanitary pump-outs, will be provided. No fueling at the facility is proposed at this time. A1?pT0Xi:1T.1RtCly 600 linear -feet of riprap will be -placed along part of the seawall, The waterward decks Nvill also have wave aftenuators attached to the floating dock. Ttic waterward most portion of the marina will. be a rninirnum of 25 feet landward of the edge of the intracoastal waterway. A portion of the project is located within an Outstanding Floricia'Walerbody and part of the Pinellas County Aquatic Preserve. The construction of that portion of the facility and the leasing of state owned ftmnittee: City of Clean-vater Permit No, 521-026i938-002 Pa"'C'2 of 15 0 • lands must be clearly in the public interest. ']lie public interest proposal is to place three intbrinatianal kiosks at the proposed marina. The kiosks will include information on boater safety, sea"rass protection, and nianatee infonnation. Also, the placement of 600 linear feet of riprap along the existing seawall will have a riet positive envu,onmental impact by danipaningy wave action and creating habitat for aquatic ACTnJTY LOCATION The pro c - jet is located below the Memorial Causeway Oil the cast side of Clearwater, Harbor, Clearwater, Section 16. J'ownship29 South, Range 15 East, Pinellas County. G11NERAL CONDITIONSs 1, All activities shall be implemented as set forth in the plans, specifications and performance criteria as approved by this periiiit. Any deviation ftomthe permitted activity and the conditions for br undertaking that activity shall constitute violation of this perrnit. L This permit or a copy thereof, complete with all conditions, attachments, exhibits. and modifications. shall be kept at the work site of thepertnitted activity. 'Ybe complete pernut shall be avaihible. forreview at the work- site upon request by Department staff. The permittee shall require the contractor to review the complete permit prior to con.i.niancenient of the activity authorized by this permit. 3. Activities approved by this permit shall be conducted in a manner which does not cause violations of state water quality Standards. The permittee shall implement best management practices for erosion and apollution control to prevent violation of state water quality standards. Temporary erosion control shall be inipleinented prior to and during construction and permanent control measures shall be completed within seven days of arty construction activity- Turbidity barriers shall be installed and maintained at alt locations ,,viiere the possibility of transferring suspended so ids 11110 the receiving watefbody exists due to the pen work. 'I"urbidity barriers shall remain in place at all locations Until construction is completed and soils are 'ttee shall beresponsiblefor stabilized arid vegetation has been established. Thereafter the pernii I thereinoval of the barriers. The permittee shall correct any erosion or shoaling that causes adverse impacts to die water resources. 4, Water quality data for the water discharged from the permillee's property or into the surface waters of the state shall be submitted to the Department as required by the permit. Analyses shall be performed according to procedures outlined in the current edition of Standard Methods for the Examinaiion of Water and Wastewater by the.Ainerican Public Health Association or Methods for C,1amical Analyses of Water and Wastes by the U.S. Environmental Protection. Agency. If water quality data are required, the perinittee ;hall provide data as required on volwnes ofwater discharged, including total. volume discharged during the days of sampling and total monthly volume discharged from the property or into surface waters of the ,state. Department staff must be notified in advance of any proposed construction � dc,,vatering 1 If the dewatering, activity is likely to result in offsite discharge or sediment transport into wetlands or surface waters. a written dewatering plan must either have been submitted and approved with the perinit application or submitted to the Department as a pan-nit prior to the dewataring event as a perrilit modification. 'The pennitteeis advised that the rules of the Southwest Florida Water Pernikice: City of Clean%,aw Peniiit No: 52=026593 18-002 Pagt -5 of IS IM—anagument District state that a water use pernu, may be required prior to any use exceeding the thresholds .in Chapter 400 -2, F.A.C. 6. Stabilization measures shall be initiated for erosion and sediment control on disturbed areas as sovai'as practicable in portions of the site where comtruiction activities have temporarily or permanently ceased, but in no case snore than seven days after the C0I-IStTUCti'_)II adi-'; ity in that portion of the site Oas temporarily or permanently ceased.. I 7. Off site discharges daring construction and development slrj I I be made ovil y thri: ugh the facilities a-athorized by this permit. Water dischargedfrom the proiect shall be throug �h structures having a meclia'aism suitable for regulating upstream stages. Stages may be subjtct to operation schedules satisfactory to the Department. The permittee shall complete construction of all aspects of the surface water matiagernetit system, including wetland compensation (grading 11ILLICIIINgy Plan' tI rig), water quality treatment 'features, and discharge control facifities prior to beneficial occupancy or use of the development being served by this system. 9, The fohowi:rig shall be properly abandoned andi"or removed in accordance with the applicable, regulations: a. Any existing wells in the path of construction shall be properly plugged And abandoned by a licensed. well contractor. b. Any existing septic tanks on site shall be abandoned at thebe-gilinuig of construction. C. Any existing fuel. storage tan" sand fuel pumps shall be removed at the . be,,�,nriinu of construction. 10. All surface water management systems shall be operated to conserve water in order to maintain environmental quality and resource protection; to increase the efficiency of transport, application and -use, to decrease waste; to minimize unimtural runoff'From the property and to minimize dewatering of offsite property. I L At least 48 hours prior to conifnencerrierit of activity awboriml by this permit, (lie perntittee shall submit to the Departitierit a wrinen notification of commencement using ng an "' Erivirontriental Resource Permit Constmetion Coniniene-e-ment" notice (Form No. 62-343.900(3), EA.C.) indicating the actual. start date and the expected completion date. 12. Each phase or independent portion of the permitted cyst: to must be completed in accordance with I p the permitted plans and permit conditions prior to the occupation of the site or operation. of site infrastructure located within the area served by that portion or phase of the system. Each phase or independent portion of the system must be completed in accordance with the permitted plans and permit conditions prior to transfer of responsibility for operation andmaltit&nance of that phase or portion of the system to a local governtrient or other responsible entity. 13. Within 30 days after completion of construction of the permitted activity, the pertnittee shall submit, a written statement of cornpletion and certification by a registered professional cri(yineer or other appropriate Individual as authorized by law, utilizing the required "Envirortmental Resource Perrnit As-Built Certification by a Registered Professional" (Form No. 02-343,900(5), FA C.), ' errmsttce: Cin, Of Clearwater 52-0265938-002 page 4 of 15 0 0 and "Request forTransfer of Envirotirnental Resource Pernut Construction Phase to Operation Additioiially.if deviations frotii the app.rc )-,:eddi-ziwi:ligs are discovered during the certification process the certification must be accompanied by a copy of the approved pen-nit drawings with deviations noted, 14. This permit is valid only for the specific Pi -ocessesoperations anddesignsind -leatedon the approved drawings or exhibits submitted in support ref f the pennit applicatiqn. Any substantial deviation from the approved drawings, exhibits, SpeciEcations or permit corlditions, including construction within the total land area bent outside the approved project area(s),rna,y consut-ute grounds forrevocation or caforciE�rnent action by the Department, unless a modification has been applied for and approved. Examples ot'substantial deviatioiisirictudeexcairati(,iriofponds, ditches or stump areas deeper khan shown on the approved plans. 15. The operaticn), phase of this permit shall not become effective tuitil the -perniittee has complied with the requirements of the conditions herein. the Department detennines, the system to be in compliance with the permitted plaris, and the entity approved by the Department accepts responsibility ffbr operation and niaintenance of the systern. The permit may not be transferred to the operation and maintenance entity approved by the Department until the operation phase of the pennit becomes effective. Following inspection and approval of the penrilitted system by the ,Department, the permittee shall request transfer of the pernift to the responsible operation and ni-ainten,ance entity approved by the DeparLment, if different from The perrnittee. Until a transfer is approved by the Department pursuant to Section 62-3431 10(l)(d), F.A.C- the pe.niiittee shall be liable for compliance with the term of the pertrtit. 16. Should any other regulatory agency require changes to the pennitted system, the Department shall be notified of the changes prior to implernentation so that a detennination can be made whether a pennit .modification is required. 1 -7. This perrnit does not eliminate the necessity to obtain any required federal, state, local and special district airthori.7ations incladme a determination of the proposed activities" compliance with the applicable conaprehensive plan prior to the start of any activity approved by this pertnit. 8. 1 his permit does not convey to the peniiittee or create in the permittee any property ri,*. or any interest in real property, nor does it authorize any entrance upon or activities on property --,;0Bich is not owned or controlled by the permittee, or convey any rights or privileges other than those specified In the pennit and Chapter 40D-4 or Chapter 400 -40, F..-1.C. 19. The pennittee is hereby advised that Section 253.77, F.S., states that a person may not cot imence any excavation, construction, other activity involving the `use of sovereign, or other lands of the state, thetitle to whi ch . is vested in the Bovird of Trustees of the Internal Improvement Trust Fund without obtaiftiiig the required lease, license, eastmient, or other form of consent authorizing the proposed use. Therefore, the pernutt" is responsible .for obtah xig any necessary authorizations from the Board of Trustees prior to commencing activity on sovereignty lands or other state- owned lands. 2 0. The perrifittee shall hold and save the from any and all damages, claims, or liabilities which may arise by reason of the activities, authorized by the pennit or any use of the permitted system. Per-nitta": cir" of^cleanvater Pmnit Nc): 52-02659-4S-002 Pap 5 oft 5 21, Any delineation of the extent ofa wetland or other surface water subinirted as part of the permit application. including plan or other supporting doe unicritati on. shall not be considered binding tin less a specific condition of this permit or aformal. determination under seciiop. 373.421 (2), F.S., provides otherwise. 22. The pertnitlee shall notify the Department in writing within 30 days of any sale, conveyance, or other transfer of ownership oi- control of the permitted systent oi- the real property at which the pe.n.11 t jttecl l systern is located. AH transfers of ownership or transfers of a permit Are subject to the requirements of section 62-341. 13 30, EA.C. Tile perm ittee, transferring the permit shall remain liable for any corrective actions that may be Yequixed as a result of any permit violations prior to such sale., conveytfice or other transfer. Upon reasonable notice to the permittee. Department authorized -staff with proper identification shat I have permission to enter, inspect, sample and test tile, system to insure conformity with Departnient rules, regulations and conditions of tile 1aenrjits. 24. if historical or archaeological artifacts are discovered at atly tinic oil the project site, the pernlittee shall ftwxtediately notify the Department and the Florida Department of State, Division of Historical ;f 25. The pertnittee shall immediately notify the Department in,%xriting of any previously submitted infc)rniation that is later discovered to be inaccurate. SPECHIC Ctrl' DITIQNS 4- Subriaivals required herein shall be directed to: Depa riment of Envirolimental Protecti On Eiiv.lronr.nei-vt,,i.I.Adi-.niii:istrator Environtnental Resource Management Program Southwest District 13051 North'Felecom Parkway Temple Terrace, FL 323637-0926 hereafter referred to as "the .Department ". Submittals include, but are not .limited to, record drmvings, progress reports, mitigation monitoring reports and water quality monitoring reports. Submittals shall include the per-mittees name and per ntitnumber. 2. The pennittee shall. be aware of and operate underriumber I througli 25 of the aforementioned "General Conditions". The General Conditions are binding upon the perri-fittee and enforceable pursuant to Chapter 403 of the Florida Sta. tutes. The pennittec is hereby advised that Florida law states: "No person shall commence any excavatian, construction, or other activity involt,ring the use of sovercip or other lands of the tale, title to which is vested in the .Board OfTRIStee-3, of theInte.m.al Irnprovement Trust Fund 0, r the Department or Environmental Protection.under Chapter 253-F.S., until such persoi) has received front the Board of Trustees tart the Internal finprovement Trust Fund the required lease, license,. casement.. or other form ofcoDscrit authorizing the proposed use." Pursuant to Rule IS- 14M2(l), 11,_.A.C., if such work is done without consent., or if person otherwise dam.-ages state (ItV of Cleam-atcx Pertnit No: 511-02659-18-002 Pa ge 6 of 15 E • land or products of state land, the .Board of Trustee!s mayle,,iy administrative fires ol'up to $'10,000 per offense. 4. The terms. conditions, and PrONTsions of the required [ease shall, be.tnct. C,onstructimi of axis activ;ty shall not commence on so' vereign submerged lands, title to w1hichis held by the Board of 'Frustees of the Internal Timprovenient Trust Fund, until all required lease documents have been executed to the satisfactionof the Departri'lenT. The sti-acture/woi-k -iuthorized'bv this perifut shall not be placed: conducted on any property. other thantliat owned by the pemiittee, without the prior written approval ofthat property owner, In the event the pc rnnittee files for bankruptcy prior to completion of work pentiAted and required by this permit. flie permittee must .nn fify the Departnient within 30 days of filing, The notification shall identify the bankruptcy court and case nuniber and shall include a copy of the bankruptcy petition. PRE-CONSTRUCTION C'ONDITIONS: 7. Subsequent to the selection of the contmctor to perfonn the authorized tActivity and prior to the initiation of work authorized by this pertnit, the pem-tittee, (or authorized agent) and the contractor, -,hall attend a pre-construction confcrcnce with. a representative of the Department's Submersed Lands and Environmentai Resources staff. The permittee shall notify the Department in wilding subsequent to contractor selection to request scheduling of ttie subject conference. S. Progress, reports for the project shall be submitted to the Department beginning October 1, 2009, and sliall continue to be submitted biannually until construction of the, perinitted project and I'llitiIL"Ition creation is completed. The cover page shall indicate the pertnit nur nber, prcjectnarrie and the perinittee name. Proggress reports must be submitted to the Department if there is no ongoing constructiom Reports shall include the current project status and the construction schedule for the following six months. The report shallinclude the following inforniation: a. Date pen.nitted activity was begun: -if work has ncz)t begun on-site, please indicate. b. Brief description anti extent of the work (i,e... dock and riprap construction) couipleted since the previous report or since the permit . vas issued. Show on copies of the pennit drawings those areas where work has; been completed, C. Brief descriptionand extent of the work ( i.e., dock and ripmp construction) anticipated iii tine next -six months. Indicate on copies of the pernut drawings those areas where it is anticipated that work will be done, d. This report shall 'include on the first page, , just below the title, the certification of the .following statement by the individual who supervised preparation of the report: "T'his report represents a true and accurate description of the activities conducted during the six month period covered by this report." it'emtitim City of cfe;jmv iter Permit My., 52-01_05r _18-002 Pagv oi i 5 0 9 EROSION CONTROL CONDrrioNs: 10, Jf the permittee is going to be driving pilings using. a hanimer, as stated in the construction `techniclues, then turbidity barriers).Aill not be requirecL However, if thepilings will be jetted then best ix awagement practices fo-r erosion control shalt be inipleniented to prevent siltation and turbid discharges in excess of the anibient turbidity levels of the surrounding Outstanding Plorida, Waters. Methods may include, but aTCnOt fitnited to, the use of staked 119y bales, staked filter cloth, sodding, seeding, staged construction and the installation of turbiditv screens around the ininiediate proj, ect site. 41. If installed, the perinittet shall be respoitsible fori ensuring erosion control devices," rocedures are inspected and.waintained daily daring -all phases. of construction authorized by this permit until areas disturbed durine construction aresufficientIv stabilized to prevent erosion, siltation, and turbid discharges. CONSI'Rt--CTI'o.ls,.COND,ITIONS: 121 Storage or stockpiling oftools and materials (i.e., lurnber,-piling-, debris) NArithin wetlands, along: the shoreline waters is I within the littoral zone,. or elsewhere within wetlands or other surfiace wa prohibited During construction watercraWcowstructi(yn barges shall operate within waters of sufficient depth to preclude bottorn scourinae p rop dredging. There shall be a minimum 12-inch clearance 1:� between the deepest, draft of the vessel (with the motor in the down position) and the top of submersed resources at mean low water. 14. All structural support pilings and mooringpilim,,,s. shall be non-CCA leaching (recycled plastic, concrete, greenheart, or wrapped Nvith impermeable plastic or PVC sleeves in such a manner as to eliminate the leaching of deleterious substances front' the pilings into the water colon and sediments), Pile wrapping shall extend to one4bot below the substrate and one-foot above the 'mean blLyb water line. Pilings which have to be replaced during the life of the Cacilityshall meet the requirements of this condition. ,15. "No Moorino" stuns shall be posted as sliown on Sheet 001 of the attached permit drawings. Mo g of vessels is prol-�ibitcdin these areas at all times. Tliesips shall advise boaters that onn V moorino I- is prohibited in those areas at all times, and shall be mounted in such anianner as to be clearly visible'bv boaters approaching the facility. Prior to beneficial use of theinaritia the pennittee shall provide clear photographic evidence that the signs were installed. The photos shall be submitted with the rcquLst to transfer to the operation phase. 16, A "No Access=' buoy shall be installed as shown on Sheet 001 oftbe attached permit drawings. Prior to beneficial use ol" the marina the permittee shall.pyovide clear photograpttic evidence that the buoy was installed. The photos shall be submitted with the request to transfer to the operation phase. 17. The permittee shall install three blinking white lights ora die docking structure as shown on Attachment 41. Prior to beiieficial use of the marina the perm.Ittee shall provide clear photographic evidence that the lig Oits were installed. The photos shall be submitted with the request to transfer to the operation phase. Pernlittee; City of Clearwatcr Permit No: 52-026S938-002 Pave 8 of 15 0 9 POST CONSTRUCTION C0N,0111ONS: 4. The perniiftce shall subnxit 'two copies ffl- sine dated find sealed as-built drawings to the Departilient for review and approval within 30 days of corripletion. of construction. The as-built dray virias sliall be based on the Department perril-Itted construction drawings. �,vllich should be revised to reflect changes made during construction, Boill the original design and constructed elevation must be clearl y shown. The playas inust be clearly 'labeled as "as-built" or "record" drawings,, Surveyed dimensions and elevations required shall be verific-d and signed, dated and sealed 'by a Florida registered surveyor or engineer. As-builts shall be ,submitted to the Del)w-onent rega)-diess of whether or not th-viations are In-esent. In addition to the "As-built Certification "fionn; the iwrnfiftee sliall submit the "Retluest li)r T•ans.kr of Environmental ibi7n as reaui�,ed in General Resow-ce Permit Conso-uction, Phas4-_, to Operation Phase, Condition F'1`13. The following inRyrination shall. be verified oil the as-built drawings thorn the enginecring drawinassigned and sealed by M. Todd Stockbergcr. P.E.,,,45f',837. on 4-21-09 and 6-1-09: Plan Viewll� ross-Section Drawin a Nurnber ., C ,Plan View Drawing SheetOO1 Cross-Sectional View Drawing Sheet 005 R iprap plan and crass- sectional view Sheet 003 The following information shall be verified on the as-built drawings frolic the engineering drawings signed and sealed by Fernando L. Pages, P-E.. #08874, oil 12- 22 -08: Plan View"Cross-Section pwyin .i uari� Plan View Drawing Sheet C-3 Plan View Drawing Sheet C•4, Plan View Drawing Sheet C-5 Plan View Drawing Sheet C-6 Plan View Drawing Sheet C-7 Plan Vied w Drawlina Sheet C-8 Plan View 'Drawing Sheet C-9 'Plan View Drawing Sheet C": -10 Plan View DraNN1,1110 Sheet CA I Plan View Drawing Sheet C -12. Plan View Drawing Sheet C -12 PIMI View Drawing Sheet C -14 OPERATION CONDITIONS: 19, Overboard d;schirges of trash, hunlart or animal waste, or fuel shall not occur at the marina. 20� The signage, lights, and marker buoys -referenced in specific conditions 16. 17, and IS shall be maintained for the life of the facility. Fish cleaning, stations shall not be allowed on structures over the water unless sufficient measures are in place (Le_ signage, sink screens. ,,vasty etc.) to ensure that overboard City Of Ciearwatcr Permit No 52-0265938-002 Page 9 of 1-4 discharges ol'trashand/Or animal waste do not occur.atthe dock. The permit tee shall submit, a plan for Department review and approval prior 30 days prior to the installation ofany fish cleaning sta . uofis. 22. Watercraft sliall operate within waters of sufficient depth to preclude bottoin scouring/prop dredging. 'There shall he a mi.n4num 12-inch clearance bevkven the deepest draft of the vessel 11 (with the ino . tor in the down position) find the top of submerged resources at nican low water. ,Vessels moored at the Facility shall besuliject to the following limitations on draft: a. Vessels in permanent slips 1-40 shall be limited to a draft Of no 111 ore than 8,fect; b. Vessels in permanent slip 41 and temporary slips 2540 shall he limited to a draft of 6 feet-- c. Vessels in temporary (10 day) slip 1.4 shall be limited to a draft of no more than 5 feet; d. Vessels iii penrianem slips 42-78 shall be limited to a draft of no more than 81bc! ', e, Vessels in permanent slips 79 -126 shall be lin.i.ited to a draft of nomore than 4 feet. 23. Side-tic mooring areas numbers I through 24 xre restricted to only mooring for ] 0 consecutive days or less. Side-tic mooring areas numbers 25 through 40 Are day use only. Overnight mooring in -these locations is strictly prohibited_ 24. Boa( repair facilities and fueling facilities on structures over the water are prohibited. -5, "Live-aboards" shall not be allowed to dock at Ifie rriarina, Mive-aboard vessel shall be defined as any boat'w"ith person or persons living aboard which is docked in the niarina for five (5) consecutive days or any ten (10) days within any thirty (30) day period. 6. shall not be provided at fhe niarina., C., Boat maintenance or repair activities requiring removal of vessel from the water, or removal of major portions of the vessel, including the engine, for purposes of routine repau- or maintenance on site, shall be prohibited .for the life. of the facility, except where removal is necessitated by emergency conditions which have resulted in or can tesuit In the sinking of a vessel. Specifiscamy prohibited shall be bull cleaning, hull painting, scraping, and discharges or release of oils or go, -eases associated with engine and hydraulic repairs, and related inelal-based bottom paints associated with bull scraping, cleaning, and painting. 28. Sewage primp -out facilities shall be installed at- thelocations shown on the attachedpennil drawings prior to or sirnultaneously with completion ofLonstruction activities. Thepermittee Shall erasure marina personnel who have been trained to operate the sewage pump-out facilities are available to assist boaters in operating g the facilities during standard business hours (at a Z� minin-,Ium) for the life of the facility. 'rhe sewav pump -out t'acility shall be in working order prior to any slip occupancy and be maintained in accordance with the requirements ofthis condition fbr the life ofthe facility. Pemiin x: City of Cfearvvater Permit No: 5?-026593,87002 hg,e 10 o1" 15 0 9 M,kNNATEE CONDITIONS: 29. All personnel associated with the project shall'beinstructed about the presence of manatees and manatee speed zones, and the treed to avoid collisions with and injury to manatees. The pernuttee shall advise all construction personnel that there are civil and criminal penalties for harming, harassing or killing manatees which are protected, under the Marine Marnma I Protection Act, the Enditigered Species Act. and the Florida Manatee SMICtUary Act. 30. All vessels associated wit'n the construction project shall operate at "Idle Speed/NoWake" at all times while in the immediate area and while in water where the draft of the vessel provides les's than afbur-fbot clearance from the bottom, All vessels will follow routes of deep water whenever possible, 31 Siltation, or turbidity barriers shall. be made of material its which manatees cannot becorne entangled, shall be properly secured, and shall beregularly monitored t. .,voi manatee - I . e to a d entanglement or entrapment. Barriers must not irripede manatee moverilent. 32, All can -site project VC17SO11-TICI are responsible for observing water-related activities fo.r the presence of manatee(s). All in-water operations. including vessels, must be shutdown if a irtanatce(s) comes within 50 feet of the operation. Activities will not resurne until the manatee(s) has moved beyond the 50-foot radius of the project operation, or until 10 Minutes elapses if the ;nanitee(s) has not reappeared within .50 feet of the operation. Animals rnmst not be herded away or harassed into leaving. 33. Any collision uith or injury to a manatee shall be reported i inmediately to the F'Vv"C Hotline at 1 - 888-404-FWCC. Collision ul(Lior.itl.iun,,,sliould also be reported to the'U,S.Fish and. Wildlife Service i.n. Jacksonville (l -904-23 )2-2580) fear north Florida or Vero Beach (1-561-562-3909) for south Florida. 34. Temporary signs concerning manatees shall be posted prior to and during all in-water project activities. All sit, gris are to be removed 1Yy the pennitiee uport, cornpletion of the project. Awareness si,&qis that have already been approved for this use by the Florida Fish and Wildlife Consen,ation Commission (FWQ must be used. One sign ineasuring at least 3 ft, by 4 ft. whIcti reads Caution: XAtratev 11rea must be posted. A second sigm measuring it least 81/2" by 11 explaining the requirements for "Idle Speed,,No Wake," and t1te shutdown of in-water operations must be posted in iflocation prominently -visible to all personnel engaged in watcr-related activities. 35. The peniuttee;lessee shall develop and implement a Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservat 1011 Commission (MC)-approved marina educational progjani (wMehincludes. at a ininiinum, permanent manatee educational signs.. speed zone booklets, and manatee edUCat1OM1. bTOChUreS) 110 later than 30 days after issuance of this permit, and must be maintained far the life ofthe facility. The Periniveo'lessee will be responsible for the cost of the educational material. The permiltee,"lessee shall develop this educational program with the assistance ofFWC, FWC shall. aplyroveiiii,,; education plan Prinz to its implementation. MarinaedUCatiG1pTQ' ani pidelin.es are available at the following link: ltttp -!"Illyfixe 'Edtig tiogaj�andf or can be ,obtained frorn FWC. Contact the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Com mission, Imperiled Species Managernent Section at: 620 South Meridian Street, 6A, Tallahassee. Florida 32399-1600 (8 50-922- -4133 0) PLruitieo! City of Ocanvater Pianift No. 52-0265938-002 Page I i (if 15 • PURL I C1.,NJE REST.,- • 36, Riprap s!mll be installed along the toe of the seawall as shown the Sheet (1031 of the attached perinit drawings, 'The riprap revetment shall be constructed within 30 days of completion of the docking :facility. Prior to beneficial use of the marina the pertryirtee shall 1 provide clear photogaphic evidence that the TIPMP was installed. 'I'lie photos shall. be submitted with the request to transfer to the operation phase. 37. "Riprap" shall consist of vinconsolidated boulders, rocks, or clean concrete .rubble. with no exposed re n.f6rcing rods or sinillar protrusions. The riprap shall be f-ee of sedirrient, debris and toxins or ohenvise deleterious submances. Rilprap shall have a diameter cif at least l2 :inches to 3 .feet, 3& The slope of the nprap shall be—no steeper than-11 (Horizontal/Vertical) and the horizontal distance of the riprap from the sca�v,-411, reveiiiieritibulk'liead shall be no more than six (6) feet. I 9. Three educ ational kiosks shall be installed as shown the Sheet Of) I o f , I attached ed pennit drawings. The kiosks shall be constructed within 30 days of completion of the docking facility. Prior to beneficial use of the marina the pertnittee shall provide clear photographic evidence that the kiosks were installed. The photos shall be submitted with the request to transfer to the operation. phase. 40. The kiosks shall include the educationalilif6miation on boater sa-fetv, seaorass protection, and manatee hiformation, as shown in Attachment]. END OF SPECUIC CONDJTJONS RIGHTS OF AFFIXTED PARTIES This permit intent to.grant a lease is hereby, granted. This action is final and effective on the date filed )vith the Clerk of the Departirieritt unless a sufficient petition for art adininistrative hearing , is timely filed under sections —20.569 and 120.57 of thx Flortda. Statutes as provided below, If a sufficient petition for an administrative hearing is timely filedthis Action automatically becomes only proposed ageniq, action on the app,lication. subject to the result of the administrative review process. Therefore, on the filinf-, of a timely and sufficient petition, this action. will not be final and effective until further order of the Department. The actual terins of the lease will be formally executed at a later date and shall include provisions for rents and such other provisions as normally are included in such lease. Because an adnTinistrative hearing may result in the reversal or substantial inodificadon of this action, tbeapplicant. is advised n I for 11 ng not to connuence construction or other activities until the deadlines noted below r f i a petition for an adtnir, straLive hearing or request for an extension of time have expi.red and until the lease has been executed and delivered. filediation is.not available. A person who-se substantial interests are affected by the Departnient's act iori inay petition for an ad-rninistrative proceeding (hearing) under sections 120.569 arid 120.57 of the Florida Statutes. The petition must contain the inforrnation sct forth below and must be filed (received by the clerk) in. the NmliiueY City of CW1rV,'atVr Pennit No: 5�--0261;93h -002' Ila P 12 of I • 9 Office of General Counsel of the Department at 3900 Comi-nonwealth Bouitevard, Mail Station 35. Tallahassee., Florida 32399-3,000. Under ails; 62-110.106(41 of the Florida Administrative Code, a person whose substantial interests are affected by (he Department's action may also request an extension of time to file a petition for an ?,drninistrative hearing. The Department may, for good cause shown, grant the request for an extension of tirne. Re qucsLsi for extension of tinie must be filed with the Office of General Counsel of the Department at 3900 Commonwealth.Boulevard, Mail -Station 35, Tallahassee, Floridz 32399-3,000, before the applicable deadline. A uniely request for extension of tine shall toll the running of tl-.ie tune period for filing it ion unnil tile request is acted upon. If a request is filed late, the Depart e t maystill , a. a Pei artrn n grant it upon a motion by the requesting party sbtawitig that the failure it) ,file a request for -an extension of time before the deadline was the result of excusabletieplect. If a timely and suff icient petition for an administrative hearing is filed, other persons whose substantial interests will be affected by the outcome of the administrative process have the right to petition to intervericill the proceeding. Intervention will be permitted only at the discretion of the residing officer p 1:� upon the filing of a motion in compliance with rule 2$ -1 116.205 of.'Llic Florida Administrative Code, In accordance with rule 62-110106(3)., Florida Administrative Code, petitions for an administrative hearing by the applicant must be filed within 14 days of receipt of this written notice. Petitions filed by any persons other Chair the applicant, and other than those entitled to written notice under section 120.60(3) of fire Florida Statutes must be filed within 14 days of publication of tine notice or within 14 Jays of receipt of the writter, notice, xvhicbe, a, occurs first. Under t. ecti.ori 1.20.60(3) of the Florida Statutes, however. any person who has asked the Department I*c)r notice of agency action may file a petition within 14 days of receipt of such notice, regardless of the date of publication. The petitiorler shall niail a copy of the petition to the applicant at the address indicated above at the time of filing: "File failure of any person to file a petition for an administrative hearing within the appropriate 4= time period shall constitute a waiver of that person's right to request an administrative determination (hearing) under sections 120 -569 and 120.57 of the Florida Statutes, A petition that disputes the material facts on which the Departillent's action is based .must contain the following information: (a) The name and address of each agency affected and cacti agency's file or identification number if Known; (b) The name, address, and telephone number ofthe petitioner; the name, address, aril telephone number of the petitioner's representative, if any, which shall be the address for service purposes during the course of the proceeding,- and an explanation of boxv the petitioner's substantial interests are or will be affected by the agency determination: (c) A statement of when and how the petitioner received notice of the of eney decision: (d) A statement of all disputed issues of material fact. If there are none, the petition must so indicate-, (e) A concise statement of the ultimate facts alleged, including tile specific facts that the petitioner contends warrant reversal or modification of the agency's proposed action: (1) A staternent of the specific rules or statutes that tirle petitioner contends require reversal or modification of the agency's proposed action-, and A stateinent of the relief sought by the petitioner. stating precisely the action that the petitioner wishes the agency to take with respect to the ag ticy's proposed action. ge 'T"emlittee: City O'Cicar"vatcr Pennit No: 52-0265938-oO2 Pate~ 13- of 15. 0 0 A petitian that does not dispute the material facts an which the Department's action is based ,,hall state that no such facts are in dispute and otherwise shall contain the same information, as set forth above, as required by rule 28-106,30 1, Under sections 120.569(2) (c) and (d) of the Florida Statutes, a petition for adaiird'strative hearing must be dismissed by the agency if die petition does .not -substantially comply with the above reqliirernarAs or is untimelY Filed. This perm it constitutes an order of the Department. Subject to the provisioirs of paragraph 120,68(7)(a) of the Florida Statutes, which may require; a remand for an administrative hearing. the applicant has the right to seek judicial review 64.`the order under section 120,63 of the Florida Statutes, by the filing of a notice of appeal under rule .9.1 1.0 of the Florida Rules of Appellate'Procedure with the Clerk of the Department in the Office of General CoLuisel, 3900 Corninomxealth Boulevard, ;;Tail Station 35, Tallahassee, Florida, 3-1-199-30001-1 and.by filing a copy of the notice of appeal accompanied by the applicable filing fees with the appropriate district court of-appeal. The notice of appeal must be filed within 30 days; from. the date when the order is filed with the Clerk- of the Department. -7 Theapplic ant. orany arty within "the meaning of section 373.114(l)(a) or 37 3.42,5 of the: Florida Ip Statutes, may also seek appellate review of. the order before the Land and WiterAd ' iudicatory Con- Lillissit)i.iuiiders(-�e.tion373.11�41.1)o.r3�/3.42'�75oft.lieFloiidaStal,utes, Requestsfbr:reviewbefore the Land and Water AdjIudicatory Commission must be filed with the Secretary of the Commission and semed on the Department within 20 days from the date when the order is filed with the Clerk- of the Department. Executed inTerriple Terrace , Florida. STATE OF YLORIDA DEPARTNYFNI' OF, ENVIROWN ENTAL PROTECTION . . . .. ......... ) eborah A. C3et7off District Director Southwest .District. DAGII;gjn Copies furnished to: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers DEP, Bureau of Beaches & Coastal Systems FWC, imperiled Species Managerneut See ion Pinellas County File Jackson I.I. Bowman & Charlotte Marlow Brigham 'Moore, LLP 1 80 102'j Ave mue N orth, Suite 100 St. Petmburg,., FL 335716 ,Pmniltee: city, of cloanvater llerniii'No: 52-0265958 -002 Pag-c 14 (if 9 .0 cswr-lF[('ATE OF SERVICT: TheandersiLmed duly designated deputy clerk bereby certifies that this permit and intent to gant autbirization I g to use sovereigil sub stem ged lands, including all copies, were malledbefore the close of'bu-siness on Q'A t o d ric abovelisted persOrls. FLLL-N., ...kN.D ACKNOWLED(INIFNT FILED. on this date, -under .120.52(7) of the Florida Statutes, with the designated Department Clerk-, receipt of wNch is hereby &Ano-wledged. Clerk Date— 7/6 Attachments: Rro-ject Drawings, 471 page s) Project Location Map Aerial Pboto Aftacbmentl and 2. 1-1 page(s) Construction Cc Inmencement Noticei62-3 43.900(3)., 1 page Aialuil't Status Rqport/627343.900(4). I page As-buM Certificatian!62-343.900(5). I page Inspection Certificat.ioii/62-343.900(16). I page Request for Transfer to Operation Phase/62-343 .900(7)' 1 page Apoication I'or Transfer of an. Enviromnelital Resource Permit-"62-343.900(8), .1 Pale_ -tei� . n- nft :City of Clerirvvater Pennit Ntx 52-026��9' 14-002 page 15 of 1,51 !il CLEARWATER, DUNEDIN, ISLAND EST. n... r.r E Ark w- 5 I I X 0 0 p - 47A STATE agPkt OFORIDA vj Cl, lo..► r frit*rl r DUPARITMEN1 OF c f" R014M N M PROTECTr rw 0 L J, JL 4 f- rj, TiTl c I , r 91A ri *4 r 4,4 Y*,L Drew St 4 La X, 10 rV tot It t r P TJc,Q Vr Lk 16 F. AA 4 0 250 500 I'Dw 1,500 2,OD0 2,500 Feet ON CLEARWATER I Ko INNnItTRim Si TE N1 A P ct—' DOWNTOWN BOATSLIPS Nc" CA lo� AiIIC FIGURE 2 5,rA 0 9 Statement of Public Interest for .City of Clearwater Downtown Boat Slips Joint ERP Application 52-0265938-002 4 Prepared by Dial Cordy and Assooiates'lnc. 490 Osceola Avenue Jacksonville Beach, Florida For Florida Department of Environmental Protection Southwest District 13059 North Telecom Parkway Temple Terrace, Florida 'A 8 June 2009 Attachment 1 • 0 Public Interest Proposal: Elements Related to Re- gulatory Concerns Only approximately 7% (0.08 acre) of the applicant's proposed structures exist over sovereign submerged lands. It is our understanding that due. to this factor, the applicant must demonstrate that the project is clearly in the public interest with regard to any foreseeable or unforeseeable environmental impacts, though the project has no direct impacts to regulated resources. The applicant's regulatory public interest proposal has six elements, the details of which are found be low. The elements include 1, Environmental education Z Habitat creation I Seagrass protection 4, Water quality protection 5, Manatee protection �6, Participation in Clean Marina program 1. Environmental education Three (not two as was previously reported) signage locations for mariner and environmental education programs are shown in the attached, revised planview drawn by Halcrow, Inc. (see "information kiosklsignboard" labels), Photographs and maps will be added to the kiosk /board displays during final formatting, as space allows, and at the discretion of the applicant, Topics to be coveted include the importance of seagrasses and their protection: manatee ecology, awareness, and conservation support; and the Clean Marina program. Language that will be provided on informational signage or :kiosks will include.the text below, or the like: The importance of Seaqrasses Seagrasses are submerged flowering plants found in shallow marine waters, such as bays and lagoons and along the. continental shelf in the Gulf of Mexico. A vital part of the marine ecosystem due to their productivity level, seagrasses provide food, habitat, and nursery areas for numerous vertebrate and invertebrate species. The vast biodiversity and sensitivity to changes in water quality inherent in seagrass communities makes seagrasses an important species to help determine the overall health of coastal ecosystems. Seagrasses perform numerous functions: * Stabilizing the sea bottom * Providing food and habitat for other marine organisms * Maintaining water quality - Supporting local economies Source: http: firesearch.myfwc.comifeaturesiview—article,asp?id= 20720 Seagrass Protection The easiest way to protect seagrasses is by preventing damage in the first place, The tips that follow on how to protect seagrasses are taken directly from the institute's publication, Florida's Seagrass Meadows. * Be Aware: If you live near the coast or along a river, be careful when applying fertilizers and pesticides to your lawn. Use only the amount of fertilizer required, and consider using a slow-release fertilizer. Gutters —lid storm drains transport excess lawn chemicals to the water. Page 4 of 18 X-PAR11 NIE-N I'OF 4 1 ,'' ,,_i1 4 AL F I F11 01, E 0 0 * Read the Waters: Wear polarized sunglasses when boating to reduce the surface glare to help you see shallow areas and seagrass beds. Polarized sunglasses can also help you see and avoid manatees and underwater hazards, ' Know Your Boating Signs and Markers: Operate your boat. in marked channels to prevent running aground and damaging your boat and seagrass beds. Know the correct side to stay on when approaching channel markers, Learn the shapes and markings of signs warning boaters of dangerous shallows and areas where boats are prohibited by law. Know Your Depth and Draft: When in doubt about the depth, slow down and idle. if you are leaving a muddy trail behind your boat, you are probably cutting seagrass. Tilt or Stop your engine it necessary. If you run aground, pole or walk your boat to deeper water. Never try to motor your way out. This will cause extensive damage to seagrass and may harm your motor. Know the times for your low and high tides. 'k Be On the tool Dacks, boathouses., and even boats can block sunlight from reaching the seagrass below. When building or repairing a dock, consider building the dock five feet above the water and using grating rather. than .planks. Extend the dock to deeper water so your boat does not shade seagrass. Study Your Charts: Use navigational charts, fishing maps, or local boating guides to become familiar with waterways. These nautical charts alert you to shallow areas so you don't run aground and damage seagrass. Know before you go. Source: http-.7iresearch.sinyfwc.com/featureslyiew—article.asd?id=22777 $"grasses Near this Marina [Space permitting, map to show seagrass boundaries around marina] Malor Seagrass Beds in Clearwater Say [Space permitting, map to show .seagrass beds in the bay) Manatees: Frequently Asked Questions Do manatees need fresh water to survive? It is unknown whether fresh water is essential for manatees' survival, but they do like it. Manatees can be found in rivers and springs as well as congregating at fresh water drainage pipes. Some people attract manatees to their docks by letting them drink water from ordinary garden hoses, This is illegal and endangers the mammals because it brings them to areas of high boat traffic. Now big are manatees? The average Florida manatee is about 10 feet long and weighs close to 1,200 pounds, Manatees can reach up to 13 feet in length and weigh 3,500 pounds. Female manatees tend to be larger than the males. Their calves weigh around 66 pounds and are 4 feet long. Now long do manatees live? Manatees in captivity have been known to live for more years.. Distinctly scarred individuals have been knownto live for E I. least 39 years, Dead animals are aged from microscopic examination if growth layer groups (annual layers, similar to the growth rings in trees) it their ear . ..... . .... . D A bones. Page 5 of 18 7` 7 ------- Tic How many manatees are in Florida waters? As of 2001, thebighest number of manatees counted in a statewide survey was 3,276. However, this is only the highest count of the number of manatees in Florida and is not a true'estimate of the population. How often do female manatees give birth? After reaching sexual maturity at 4.7 years, female manatees give birth to an average of one calf every two:.or three years. The calf stays with its mother for up to 2 years. How fast are manatees-? Tracking studies have shown that manatees can travel up to 50 miles or 80 km in a day, Manatees, generally swim slowly but have been clocked at speeds up to t5 mph (25.kmlhr) for short bursts. How long can manatees stay underwater Without breathing? While time varies with the animals' level of activity, manatees surface to breathe about every four minutes. When resting, they can stay underwater up to 20 minutes before surfacing for air. How much do manatees eat? Manatees, feeding between 6 and 8 hours daily, consume about, 4 to 9% of their body weight in wet vegetation such as :seagrass and other aquatic plants. Source: http.,Ilreseatch.myfWc.comisupportiview-faqs,asp?id=17 What Threatens Manatee Survival? * Habitat Loss: Coastal development and pollution can seriously harm manatee habitats by affecting their main food source, seagrass. I Watercraft. Collisions with boat 'hulls and propellers have caused approximately one quarter of all manatee deaths since 1974 (when record keeping began). Manatees feed on seagrass beds in shallow water where there is little time or room to dive to the bottom to avoid oncoming boats. Death way result from propeller wounds, impact, crushing, or any combination of the three. ' Entanglement: Discarded crab traps and fishing gear cause problems for many marine species, including manatees. Manatees can also ingest harmful debris. * Canal Locks and Flood Gates: Manatees are sometimes crushed in gates or killed by asphyxiation. * Poaching: Historically, trianatees have been hunted for their meat, hide, bones and fat by Native, Americans and European settlers. Manatees were In high demand in the lato:1800s. Hunting is now rarely a problem. * Natural Causes. Manatee deaths can result from things like sudden freezes, non-infectious diseases, birth complications, natural accidents, red tide (such as the one in March and April of 1996), and other natural catastrophes. Source: http:lltcsearch.myfwc.corti,'supportiview_ E", Page 6 of 18 J P, 0 Support Manatee Conservation Iff 59=1 • The manatee license plate was created to raise funds for ma a' n t" research and protection. Originally sponsored by the Save the Manatee Club, ,responsibility 'for the plate. was Shifted to the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission i(FWC) and the plate was enacted on March 6, 1990, To date, over 559,000 manatee license plates . ha.ve.,been issued and nearly $34,000,000 has been collected. Revenue from sales of the manatee license plate are deposited into the Save the Manatee Trust Fund, which is managed by the FWC. The trust fund is the primary funding source for the State's manatee-related research and conservation management activities. Source: hftp://rtsezirch.myfwc.comifeatur,6i/,jiew-arti;:)eAsp?id=29968 ManateeiWiidiife Alert Lino If you find a dead or injured manatee, please report it by calling 1-888-404-FWCC (1-888-404-3922). Cellular phone customers. can dial *FWC or #FWC Please be prepared to answer the following questions, What is the exact location of the animal? Is the manatee alive or dead? How long have you been observing the. manatee? What is the approximate size of the manatee? What is the location of the public boat ramp closest to the manatee? Can you provide a contact nurnber:where you can be reached for further Information? The above information is the most important you can provide. However, any additional information will be helpful. Sourcm bttp://research.myfwc.conVsupportiview — faqs.Asp?id=1 7 and http:llresearch.myfwc.corrdfeatures/view_article,asp?ld=7596 Page 7 of 18 I i.,. Pi 1', i,_ f 0 The Clean Marina Program 0 The Florida Clean Marina Program it a voluntary designation program With a proactive approach to environmental stewardship. Participants receive assistance in implementing Best Management Practices through on-site and distance technical assistance, mentoring by other Clean Marinas and continuing education. To become designated as a Clean Marina, facilities must implement a set of environmental measures designed to protect Florida's waterways, These measures address critical environmental issues such as sensitive habitat, waste management, ttormwater control. spill prevention and emergency preparedness. 'Designated facilities and those facilities seeking designation receive ongoing technic-at support from the Florida Clean Marina Programand the Clean Boating Partnership. "Clean water is vital to -Florida's intertidal environment and economy. Clean Marinas, Clean Boatyards and Clean Marine Retailers lead the way in protecting this precious resource." —Michael Sole, Secretary, 2. Habitat creation Source. http:/Iwww.flortdadep.oeg/cleanrnerinal�bout.htm Rocky habitats are important for countless species of macroinvertebrates (including is000ds, bivalves, crabs' shrimps, etc.) and small fishes, as well as mmacnog|ga*. The hard surfaces provide space for attachment, while the interstices (space between provide nefug1m. Such areas are considered Eaomnd$| Fish Habitat (EFH) by the National yWmhne Fisheries Service as they provide hursery areas for numerous fish species. Also, Such areas are excellent foraging areas for larger fishes, mbn,mbivds. and certain [epb(gy. The applicant vvm install 660 linear feet ofbou|dadnouk }n the intertidal zone along the mainland bulkhead (position noted on attached p|onview drawn by Ha|oruw" Inc,, see 'revetment toe" label). The first photograph below shows the typical shoreline in its current condition, while the second:and third photographs below show representative photos of anticipated post-construction of the hooky habitat. The pocks will also function to protect the shoreline from boat wakes from vessels pa ssing in the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway and from wind-generated waves.. _ ___ Page 8 of 18 Pro" p osed ravi g atlon li g htin g plan \ rfbRA Sketch. b.Y Halcrovv/Offal Cordy & Assoc for USCG consideration .� 8.ianuary 2009 Clearwater municipal marina at causeuraj+ � p a ynr'°i 2'`�i �G ` b x - � iAl WTI hlte fight blinking E ,, ,� � Exlsting ilghted pier �`i � �� s, t at 2 5 s Interval p..3�Yr ;�G -�+• I.n �' S �1v' Yxjr�3• � t:e} 1p` S. t' 1 >< 4..•xy,Arb�} a�" .tx,s �.,�. �i'x"� '��,�` -f� €�� +left s N i ,r �.. a x KE �� _a � � b ;� r _ t q� - "�`'• � .: �%nx Y,3� -. 3'- � ��"«'vf"d.37 t r � �y`et � F'r�b �yL""�''y�'�,. ;•; � - '" .n Ek°� r s � X Y � � ws }•�` 2e { 35a's a �; i, r+ y�'<�a+la�s�,�. v.. •.'�•�..� 'i. `` e.hti ��w'i•Pt a :,'�"1 ��t � r!`�L' 3 ��,,v s" c.� �?�'-°4'�'gie�,.z ?+X ° i { cr'= +ae - is..''`'' f d3.J- '-G�e' k=; a`�*s�. +A�'y,,ty" ' x Wlhiie light thinking' ;� , > i y 1 t' t 5-6, s Interval v�` " +G tY f�� r 3 S� a,93Y d x7si hr�t Ycy j 'h1 fM. ba��yyyy,r'`i ,�,h 5''. -„�t'r ,�••yaf . t ate` NO Rl *7 a �- n�r'�I ^.`r y, -i kit W r 9 `� }'" " 1 Y a war r t# �i "i'gaf 4 3 ".ad"!` ^'M z . ci', i. C Fd r r S ru 4 _ ij' g�k . '6h,..v` i P" a'.' 'ss. e a 's� 3St . k . q ..• z '. � n r . x v r ..,yam Y r' ''S�tx r a �F'• �` b qcx �� i;. *r ,'14 vlu �zt . Aitachnaent�. . - - _ _ � G]. c� °��' ti ? •tea d'byad�,+�^�^g�V�ii.E. a•"',. ` �� i� hite,lghl blinking at �".5 s interval. i Ee Am No colored lights are to be used on any of the docking structures-or;pilings� r - t Project: ronn 4`2-341900z-'!'i FAC Form con mmcrion c0=1mccule'rit Nol; c c ENVIRO-NIM-ENTAL RESOURCE PERMIT Construction Commencement Notice Phase: I hcrebyno ifs Ah-e ATwmniant of Environmental Protectibh that the canstruction of zhe surface water management systew. authorized by Environmental Resource .l Nunlber :has commenced / is expected to Commence on and dl require a duration cif approximately months weeks days to complete. It is undeNoodibat sbould the construction teml extend beyond one year, I am obligated tos:Pbralt The Annual Status'Report, for surface Water Management System Const—ruction.. PLENS E NOTE, If the am-al constriction conimencement hate is no rknownt Dep,anm. cat staff should be sonotifted in wri'tin-g- in order to satisfy permit conditions. Pennittee or Authorized Agem 'Fitle and Company Dale Phone 6'1-143%,VJOO 2,;01 7 kag W Address 0 • Fonn 062-343,9010(6) FAC ro".'ride:. Inspection cmirkat'i""I FMcfNe Dafe:-Ootob-T ',,I �95 ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE PERMIT INSPECTION CERTIFICATION Permit'Number: Project Inspection Date(s): Inspection resalts: (check one) Ell hereby certify, that I or my designee under my.direct supervision have inspected the system at tdre Pbo,,T referenced project and that the system appears to be functionin-c 1'r) accordance , Wit,) the, requirements of the pormii and Chapter 373 F.S. (as appkable). ❑-rhe follo% ing necessan, maixntenance was conducted: -E]J hereby certifi, that I or my designee wider in), &ectstuptr,.,-islor) has inspected the systein at the above referenced project and that the system (14 stem does not appear to c ftimfioning in accor , nce i W1 th the requirements ofthe permit and Chapter 373 F.S. (as applicable). I have infornied the operation and maintenance entity of the following: (A) that the system does not appear to befunctioning properly. (b) that niamtenanCe !S required to bring the sz)�stem into compliance, and (0) if maintenance mea I surts are not adequate to bring the system; into compliance-, the systenl may have to be replac.40tan alternative design constructed subsequent to Departinent: approvaL Name Signature of Professional Engineer Comnanv Na-me Florida Registration NuMber Company Address Date Cityx state; Zip Code Telephone Number (affix Seal) WMin 30 days, of completion of the inspection; salbrf6l ttiVo copies of - the forin to the fk)l lowing Department 0.1 ce-- 62-341,900(6) On-Line Lkvuinpta Fornoried 12!01197:kag 0 0 Form Tific: RN11t,0 F()r "I'M, nSL,r if' Opzmition Phase Request for Transfer of Environmental Resource Permit Construction Phase to Operation Phase (To he completed and ftibmiited by the operating ewtty) Florida Departinent af.Enviroamental Prtytectiovi It is, requested that Department Permit Number authorizing the construction and operation of a surGice water rnanagenlent system fbr the below mention pr6ject be transferred from the ccmstruction phase permittee to the operation phase operating entity. From: Name` Addressi City: State: Zip: To: Name: Address- Citv- state: Zip: The surface water man.%geraent facilities are bereby act; Ved for operation and maintenance in accordance "Arith the engineers certification and as outlined is the MkfiOdVe covenants, and articles, of incorporation for the operating entity, Enclosed is a copy of the docurnern transferring tide of the operating entity for the com.mon, areas on .which the surface water managerri nt system islocated, Notethatifth.coperating entity has not been previously approved, the applicant should contact the Department statYprior to filing for a permit transfer. The undersigned hereby agrees that all terms and conditions tit f the permit and subs ecluent.modijkations". if ariv, have been ,re vie-wed. are understood and are hereby accepted- Add y proposed modifications shall .be applied -plied for and oNainedprior to such modification, Operating Entity: 'ride.. Name Telephone: Enclosure r] copy of recorded transfer of title surface water.tnanagement system F-1 Coy of plat(s) F1 Copy of recorded restrictive covenants, articles of incorporation, and certifit;ate of incorporation. 62-'4-.900(7) On-Lin,eDoctimcm Fr matted UiO P47 kag 62-3433,900(41 fomiTftic AnnaalSfaiusRqxmi E.qct ive Octoba 3, 1 �195 Environmental Resource Permit Annual Status Report Florida Department ot.'EnAronmental Protection P E RA 11 T � �'U M`B ER: COIJNTY PROJECT N-MME- PHASE: The folloxti in- activity'has occurred at the above referenced pov�ject du i the past year, between June 1, and May 30, z rift-2 Wsc.Addifional Sheets As Neoessx-y) tict,dimark.Descriptioxi flolle Per iiazor control stmoturc): Print Name Phone Permittee's or.Aurtborized Agem's SiganaTure Title and G om any Date Date o Cot pletio T'Iiisfom shall be submitted to the above referenced Deparunent Office daring June or each year fkv duration of construction exceeds one year. 0-341906(4-1 On-Line Docwxnt F0. r-alatt"d 1 -;01: )"rag kag 0 9 Applizailimi fiN I rzsn,xR-�, o, rn", Efrw;'k."ve Us : t--14-91, ., APPLICATION FOR TRANSFER OF EiN7N.,'IRONN-T. -Il'T ANTD NOTIFICATION OF SALE, OF A FACILITY OR SURFACE"-WATER. NNIANAGENAENT SYSTEM Pen, fit ti.,. Date Issued Date E%pirez, FROM (Natne of CurrentPernlit Holder) Mailing :address Ci Televhone: State , - Zip Code Idea ificaiion or Name of Facility/Surface Water Martalgerttent System: phase of'Facii.ityiSur.faceWateTNlaiiageiiient System (if applicable): The u-ndersigined here=by notifies the Department }f the sale iyr legal transfer of this facility, orsurface- water managetnent sysien,, and further agrees to assign all rights and obligations as.permittee, to the applicant in the event the Department a-Mes to the trwisfer of permit. a of the current permittee: Title (if any): TO ( Name, of Proposed Permit Transfaeo Maiiing Address,: City; Telephone: Date: state: Zip (,ode: ,['he undersigned hereby notifies the Department of.having acquired the title to this facility, or surface - water. management sy,mcm,. The undersigned alsostaters be or she has examined the application and documents submitted by the current pertnittee, the basis of Much the permit vvas issued by the Department, and status they accurately and completely describe the perm-itted activity or project. The undersigned further attests to being familiar Nvith the permit, agrees to cornply with its terms and with its conditiotis- and agrees to Assume the rights and liabilities contained in the permit.'flie undersigned also agrees to promptly notifythe.Departinent of any future changes in ownership of or responsibility for, the permitted acre Pity orp rol Signature of the applicant (Transferee): - Title (if ariv): - Projject Engineer Name (if applicab le) Maflinn, Address: "I"Cle-plione: Date: 0 0 Form? 462-341KIN)(5), FA,C Forin Tidc: As-Bujit Ca-fificabun by a Rc:E:istsnA,,d Pinfessi " 11 i Eff�cfive Date: October 3,1995 ENVIRGINMENTALRE, SOURCE PERNMIT AS-BU ALT CERTIFICATION.BY A REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL Permit Number: Project `Name: I hereby certif'y that all components of this surface water manage rnent :system have been built substantially in accordance ikrith the approved plans and specifications and are ready for inspection. Atty substantial deviations (noted behw),fi-Om the approved plans and specifications will .not prevent the sy stein fAmm functioning as designed when properly maintained and operated. These determinations arebased upon on- site obsbrvation of the system conducted by me or by my designee under my direct supervision. and/or my review of as-built plans certifies! by a registered professional or Land Surveyor licensed in the State of Florida. Name (please print) Signature of Professional company Name Florida ReInistTation NNumber Comp,uly Address Date City, State, Zip Code Telebone Number (Affix Seal) & 1 ubstaptial deviations ftorn the approved plans and specifications,- (Note; attach tx-vo copies of as-bat plans Mien there are substantial dev.1"atioll's) Within 30 days of completion oftbe system, submit two copies of the form to-, 62-3419 10(5') ,)n-biw Dmumtmt fi,maw_d 12/0 1 J9� kax, m,.. X-a b uaq ✓ s 5 z°" a :_ _ i ._._ _. I J _ d p r r:� ;r r's- L --rr•- �" - ...__,___.. ,_ r. { __ r fir.._. r... •�.�,.. -. �1 ,i . 5 i � W. IF' ekz 5 (al+jis #e` s l .i.Mi ss ury st sak s' aide ei 1, i �� W� Y ` DOCK f Y C I ta,tc1.c, b.t al� ji NORTH B r NO N . I 4 v DOCK I.. ?. %idly vi V (,�u�� 1 �1 �r Xr E �� y1 `'La'l� DOCKF ). �f�.. - ._J .i _1i.,. .J14.._ I .aK i.: T� �x •,y,°, } +'° I if 9 r l �m s�(�,i s,ls�r s j �_ SOUTH BASIN .� f.` I - �. I `: gyp I C� DOCK C� sd laa� c t si ic?L ". s 9 EIS toy / � � � � �__ .f 'sue �� ✓ "5 I r _. ,ate` r",�' � �4.In eAtrt tx clu q'v dual } \DOCKD . 3 . . + i r t� � ^ . O;: �iAF � •.• ,/- t()tt � 5!! it IN 3 ... hM ', t, AtFF C ?VED IDA va5rioea rntr�.0 PS 3. nvrr -.ca�u TJ 4t 5[itK.t1 1.5 M5.�t3 . ^�_..— ...y K.u.u,u nsa.aY GI I 't'�F.'iC JI Ui' w• Y AP _NARY AiO pt bRLAS sx: u FOR PERMIT ONLY ceaz"ir' ytacr d'SZtt3.-sis is a. .,.... - _ ..... . f ai C(.: fi`N _ f � c .. .r.xt:..�: a�.~li - _ MISENER MARINE -o � � tUU Sn. 6U r;le Arc.,', .u_.� r ( ✓` CONSIRUCTSON INC I i ca E ' Y ri1 C v rJ s earc�a ':i 5 -t.: M, TOd! SStx:kbOY 6r, f C ! -. ,qz - I t`it: h�li `54t U.EAk77AT q g' t "+'U t . :1Y„S� h.. S 4pp-6 'k�ttixSEh 1' a 3t MS t.�rcur'+i • l B 7' �.f,,.�.'y�� ` i 9. ter S 4 u0'3N1 Fa•05M T.c}, A tC[, �, 9 Ll t ' v .,7,a f "teAietraitOn NO. 55H37 y!/ / �!' ,W' •!K..G'{ r- <a..{� ................. ENGINEERING PLAN } 001 -� I C A L L ......................... . . . . ..... - -- ------ --- .. ........ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .... . .. .. . ......... . . ... . ..... .,EVA N 71,7 LIAL FOR PERMIT ONLY . ... . ........ • • • FOR PERMIT ONLY Plalcrow . . . . . . .............. ` -°' ................... . .. ....... . ........... . . ......... . MI tNER MARINI i Clearwate ... . ......... • • SHEET NO. T_ I I TITLE SHEET C -2 GENERAL NOTES C-3 MARINA LAYOUT C-4 SOUTH BASIN LAYOUT W/PILES C-5 A-DOCK LAYOUT C-6 B-DOCK lAYOuT SOUTH BASIN C-7 C-DOCK -AYC SOUTH BAS C-8 D-DOCK LAYOUTISOUTH BAS C-9 MARGINAL WALKWAY (SOUTH BASIN) C-10 NORTH BASIN LAYOUT W/PILES C-11 I A-DOCK LAYOUT (NORTH BASIN) C-12 1 B-DOCK LAYOUT (NORTH BASIN) C-13 SHORE SIDE WALKWAY (NORTH BASIN) C-14 MARGINAL WAIXWAY (NORTH BASIN) C-15 IV x 41' WAVE ATTENUATOR DETAILS C-16 12- . 41' WAVE ATTENUATOR REINFORCEMENT C-17 12' x 50' WAVE ATTENUATOR DETAILS C-18 i 12' x 50' WAVE ATTENUATOR REINFORCafEN'T C-19 10' x 50' WALKWAY DETAILS C-20 10' x 00' WALKWAY REINFORCEMENT C-21 8' x 29' WALKWAY DETAILS C-22 8' x 29' WALKWAY REINFORCEMENT C-211 6' x 50' WALKWAY DETAILS C-24 FJ: X 50' WALKWAY REINFORCEMENT C-25 4 x 30 , FINGER DETAILS C-28 4' x 30' FINGER REINFORCEMENT C-27 4' x 40' FINGER DETAILS C-28 4' x 40' FINGER REINFORCEMENT C-29 4' x 45' FINGER DETAILS C-30 4' x 45' FINGER REINFORCEMENT C-31 4' x 50' FINGER DETAILS C-32 4' x 50' FINGER REINFORCEMENT C-33 5' x 50' FINGER DETAILS C-34 5* x 50' FINGER REINFORCEMENT C -35 5 x 55' FINGER DETAILS 6-36 5 x 55' FINGER REINFORCEMENT C-37 MARGINAL WALKWAY CONNECTIONS C_ 38 PILE DETAIL & SCHEDULE C-39 I PILE GUIDE DETAILS C-40 CORNER C-41 38' GANGWAY DETAILS ELEVATIONS C-42 36' GANGWAY DETAILS C-43 I 58' GANGWAY DETAIL C-44 52' GANGWAY WITH LANDING DETAIL CITY' OF CLEARWATER DOWNTOWN BOAT SLIPS CLEARWATER, FL FC ........... .. . ................... . ........ . ... . .. . ........... ......... . ..... . ......... . ....... . ... I PA0 G E 4 4. CONTACT INFORMATION PROJECT DESCRIPTION . ...... . . . . ...... . .... . L OF 44 3 OF •4 MISENER MARINE CONSTRUCTION, INC. 4 OF' 44 5800 W 5 OF 44 COMMERCE STREET 6 OF 44 TAMPA. Fl 33616-1930 FLORIDA 7 OF 44 8 OF 44 PHONE; 813-639-84-44 9 OF 44 FAX: 813-831-7498 110 OF 44. III OF 441 OF 44 113 OF 441 114 OF 441 15 OF 44 TETRA TECH, INC. 16 OF 44 401 E. OCEAN BLVD. SUITE 420 17 OF 44 1 LONG BEACH, CA 90802 18 OF 441 CLEAR WA ER T 119 OF 44i PHONE: 562-495-0495 20 OF 44 '71 FAX: 562-495-5029 MARINA 2I OF 4 4-, S 2 22 OF 44 3 OF 44 1 :24 OF 44 DOCK 14 !HUFACTU 4* 25 OF 44 26 or 441 SHOREMASTER, INC. 27 OF 44 1.025 INTERNATIONAL DRIVE 28 OF 44 FERGUS FALLS, RN 56538-0358 29 OF 44 i 31 30 32 OF 44 OF 44 OF 44 PHONE: 218-739-4641 FAX: 218-739-4008 133 OF 44 34 OF 44 :35 OF 44 36 OF 441 ogo ....... 4;, 37 OF 441 46 t 38 OF 44 % OF 44 E Nce 40 OF 44 ko TRIS DRAWING Com—AINM-PROPRLETARY INFORMATION WWCR IS THE PROPERTY OF SUDRF"= INC. AI 0- b98 S74 AND SfWl, NOT 99 COPIED, REPROVVCED OR kag AVAIIABIX TO An PERSON(S) WrTROUT 41 OF 44 42 OF 44 "rTTER ComsviT Of SHOREMiSTER INC. 43 OF 44 TETRA TFCYt INC 44 OF 44 It 0 R ON OPATN RYi �sz 4- m3p Go 11/00 trams acv so S c vmw.tnir. +:ro7. min CWOM - RM AU A 44 -- ----- DWG T- I CLEkRWATrR 'Ar 4wls) REV DESCRIPTION .. . .... . ..... DESIGN CRITERIA: 1. VERTICAL LOADS: LOAD FOR FLOTATION DESIGN SHALL BE 30 PSF ON DECK DECK ANTI DOCK SUBSTRUCTURE DESIGNED TO WITHSTAND 50 PSF. 2. FREEBOARDS: WALKWAY FREEROARDS UNDER DEAD TOAD SHALL BE 20'!2 ". FLOATING TAW ATTENUATOR FREEDOARDS UNDER DUD LOAD SHALL BE 24 "t2 '. 3. HORIZONTAL LOADS: ANCHORING SYSTEM SHALL BE DESIGNED FOR THE FOLLOWING LOADS: HIND LOAD SHALL BE 96 MPH. CURRENT VELOCITY SHALL BE 1.1 Fr/ SEC. 4. WAVE LOADS: DOCK SYSTEM SHALL HE DESIGNED FOR AN OCCASIONAL SIGNIFICANT HAVE HEIGHT OF 1.5 FEET. WAVE ATTENUATOR SHALL ATTENUATE THE FOLLOWING WAVE CONDITIONS', NON - CONTINUOUS EVENT WITH A SIGNIFICANT WAVE HEIGHT OF 4.2 FEET AND A WAVE PERIOD OF 3.6 SECONDS. THE ATTENUATED WEAVE BRIGHT SHALL NOT EXCEED 1.6`. d. DOCK AND WAVE ATTENUATOR SYSTEMS ARE NOT DESIGNED TO RESIRT- FORCES ASSOCIATED WITH HURRICANE OR LGING DURATION STORM EVENTS, 0. DOCK AND WAVE ATTENUATOR SYSTEMS ARE NOT DESIGNED TO RESIST FORCES OR ATTENUATE WAVES ASSOCIATED WITH LONG PERIOD SWELL& TECHNICAL NOTES; CONCRETE DOCKS 1. CONCRETE TO BE HIGH STRENGTH MIX DESIGN 6000 PSI, MINIMUM 6 28 DAYS PER ASTM C -04. E. ALL CONCRETE SHALL HE AIR- ENTRAINED FROM 4 TO 7 PERCENT AND SHALL BE TESTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM c -138, C -173, OR C -231. 3. WATER /CEMENT RA710 SHALL NOT EXCEED .40. 4. SLUMP RANGE SHALL BE 8" TO 10' WHEN TESTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH AST! C- 143 -78. 5. WIRE MESH SHALL BE HOT DIPPED GALVANIZED W4.O X W4.0. 6. REBAR SHALL BE EPDXY COATED GRADE 8D AND CONFORM TO ASTM 815. 7. THE CLOSED CM EXPANDED POLYSTYRENE CORE USED INSIDE THE CONCETE UNIT SHALL MEET FEDERAL SPECMCA77ON C- 678 -65 WHICH SUPERSEDED FEDERAL SPECIFICATION HH- 1 -524C. 8. THE FOAM SHALL WEIGH BETWEEN .95 AND 1.10 PCF, EPS TO HAVE A MAXIMUM ABSORPTION OF 9, PCP AT 7 DAYS AS A MEASURE BY TBB "HUNT ABSORPTION TEST ", !0. ALL STRUCTURAL STEEL CHANNELS, ANGLES, AND PLATES SHALL BE FABRICATED FROM MILD STEEL CONFORMING TO ASTM A -38, AND SHALL, DE HOT DIPPED GALVANIZED AFTER FABRICATION. 11. BOLTS; NUTS, WASHERS AND THRU -RODS SHALL HE MILD STEEL, IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM A -307, ALL HARDWARE SHALL BE HOT DIPPED GALVANIZED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM A -123. WASHERS WASHERS SHALL BE USED WITH ALL NUTS AND BOLTS WHICH HEAR ON WOOD OR STEEL. ROUND PLATE WASHERS SHALL BE USED ON ALL THRU -RODS BEARING ON WOOD SURFACES. STAINLESS STEEL FASTENERS CAN BE SUBSTITUTED FOR GALVANIZED STEEL FASTENERS. 12, WHALER SHALL. BE CCA TREATED TO .8, 11 SYP. 13, DECK SURFACE ON CORNER SECTIONS SHALL BE 1/2' THICK !TRAY STARBOARD, 14. SIDE BUMPER AROUND PEROirM SHALL BE 5001 -B MANUFACTURED BY K&R EXTRUDED BLACK VINYL WITH BLACK VINYL CORNER BUMPERS. is. BUMPER IS TO BE ATTACHED WITH SS NAH.4 A 8" 0/C TOP AND BOTTOM. Is.. CLEATS TO BE 12' AND 15" SHoRENASTER AI3fAG S NOTES: 1.. Horizontal and/or vertical controls are not provided in these drawings and are the responsibility of others, 2. All clearances and distances sha%vii in these drawings between dock system and existing structures, property lines and/or right of ways are approximate avid may vary in accordance with the plans which specify horizontal control. 3. Floating docks' and floating wain attenuators' drafts were deemed appropriate based on bathymetric survey by George F. Young, Inc. Proj. No. 03 -13- 0537 -01, 03120/06.. Shore-Master will not be responsible for any changes in. field conditions which may require additional clearance or dredging. rrt r tt The design criteria used for this dock system are consistent with industry gqn. Urrn'z ouidelines and standards. Any deviation from these guidelines on the marina layout was a result of physical Constraints within existing structures, property lines and right of ways, and was accepted under the direction of the Owner. Additional design criteria were developed by Olsen Associates, Inc. 05/2006. t " r: Fendering/mooring piles shown herein are schematic and are the - CLEATS, '*tr ��•`c�N$F efo• aea7a ' eYhTE C.' Tr E0 TCGIi INC. 5... H L?° a SM1 Sxe 47 ^v Manufacturer reservoir the right to make p0r �a �,r a uh CA 9 Rsl ehangea to Items Shown on the drawing to Improve quality, structural integrity F,� �� eI 66749 Af95 and /or appearanoe. The owner is responsible to Safe 610 { tL Y58Z49 -oz9 oompHanae **4th the OPeratIOUR and Maintenance Manual d the Structure in response 1 rty o o Wers. 8. Concrete abutments for gangway connection are not the responsibility of ShoreMaster. 9. Changes or modification made to utilities after 121161'08 may afTeet the buoyancy and stability of the dock system. 10. Idle tip elevations were Calculated based on the site specific geotechnical investigation by WAS Proj. No. 1306.012 -00, 09/26,12006, and 2008 F DOT Design Standards for prestressed concrete piles. 11. All piles shall be driving to the specified minimum tip elevation as confirmed by a Tetra Tech approved personnel. If minimum .tip elevation is not reached, Tetra 'Tech shall be contacted immediately to assess the condition and provide recommendations. 11 The dock system shall be installed by ShoreMaster personnel or under ShoreNlaster supervision. THIS DP.AWD4G .CONTAINS, PROPRIETARY INFORMATION WHICH IS THE PROPE3TY OF SHORE1tA.Sr LNC. AND SHALL. NOT RE COPIED, REPRODUCED OR MADE AVAn iRLE TO ANY PERSON(q) WITROLT PRIOR WRTrrEN CONSENr OF SHOREHASTER INC. 11' ti2Qftil4\S3IlGIt3 __._... GENERAL, NOTE 9Y "dRZVMTZR B,VC /xsaxW. " 4 DDP 00 /I1 /OB rots f AAYtJS',I9Y'nAGL iIJC. P.O. DOl J6a SEl$r N0, CRICUD BY rrocusr,lY /hYN s66Jd Rtd9 I 8 F 4} C /eieJ 7Ja ♦arr O (sanJ Jae -estis' $ emsm Roma "'- u-u-a DWYG -_rer laraJ �JS .00g_ I1EV . DBSCRIFrION L APPET,. DATE : C -2 CLEARWA'TER .... . . . ............... . . . . .......... M0111L Ina PAVE AmMATUR, .. . ....... .406* go ---------- ant. —yT man pmm 66 nNm J ITIP. of 5 TYP. A " MUDZL,400 CONCRETE r1bArm Dw r .w ma P199 MODEL 125" -r-=UATOR ?Tp' by 7 D DOC 0 C-K- EBI" I& OY a lot —1 QOUTH BA11 SUPSCHEDULE rr- PDYDEEPSR NDRTH BASIN LENGTH —QTY WIDTH I v DOCKA 17 SLIPS 14 UPS -1— DOCK C • SOUTH BASIN LENGTH Q.Tm WIDTH j 4 4W-6- 79. 2@18, VOCKA 51SLIPS 1 i \\OCK D�rlf DOCX A gz4.-.a- ............ OOCK 9 GAMAT 20LIAJ 7 X AND Mw Rum gy Dram 53, "NOWAY DOCK a sum sr 16 11L I Sr S' PS r= 1AXDIM wcK C 9U1LIIS IS z 0.17�1 11 LO F7 y (fto 64' Rw y"'m Tam COAL W/C LKY"..0 ID"", ovu 12 9 Ir .. . ........ l TOTAL SLIPS 140• 653?4 16 39-SLIPS 0 . . . . . . . . . ................. vA,IE Of QTY41 W SLIPS QTY20 55; w M L A . . . . ....... . GUI -P3,:1 MODEL 3900 WAVE iTTRIWATOR 60, 1101-1. -r MIXI PAW 35"-1 f" 56' ru(m I DOCK A V w 48' MOWN "P. or PM a NORTH BASIN DOCKS 6411-3' !a MODEL 400 CONCRETE PLOirm DOM tTi ,7 4� 45, Mon v o'u•IT/ Tm or a vn; GANGWAY go"l- AM III)a RAW r= u;o 88' *AMWAY k T/con Fun TOTE VRM CONN. um 3w Ap v A-, V1.0 wu 561,05,0415 " . ................ iifs DRAVINaCOTAINS, PROPRIRTARY INFOMIATIoN WHICH IN TUP PROPERTY OF SHOREWA STE R J INC. AND SHALL NOT HE COPIED REPRODUCED 09 MADE AVALDARLE TO ANY PERSON(S) VITHOUT PRIOR WRrMN CONSENT Oi SHORRIDSM INC, LUrXWMffZ= AWtA==w FLAN VIEW ge"i I,-11. -p_ MARINA LAYOUT r AT& 0 "&"Afj"xj? r"lazwn! D 09/11/08 — �41 11 ST . 7 NO; Scale i—r;�7160 fl- ga Aw-r on OPH DATE DWG #-' C-3 CLFARWATFR I 2 1 '- I o' -4-- L-12' 100' -5 C, 0 U"� — f2' 5' x 61511 2' FINGER PIER R TYV. OF 5 12'— L \�4 MODEL 1250 . NUATOR UATOR 494' 25 1260 WAVE AIIIIENIJATUR ae'-1 56' FTNGRR P;R TYP. OF 6 J —343'-10' MODEL. 400 CONCRETE FLOATING DOCK 4' x 50' FINGER PM F *t Ft . 9 TYP O 9 \ m - a I SOUTHBAS x 40' FINGER . - vp. a a i", 27' 4 x 40' FINGER PIER TYP. OF 8 17 4 1, DOCK C 24' 4V-i7 4' x 30' FINGER PIER TYPI OF a 2W-10' �OCK D, 3, '19 GANGWAY ROLISR11; -J AND MINI RAMP :a rao ori BUOYS BY OTHERS Y 8' x 63' GANGWAY Cf- Nfe d, VN 88874 8' FACED LANDING- -TA-TE 8' x 54' RAMP )%00 PLAN VIEW RAMP ......... 35 36 70 FIFTH WHEEL CONN. 70 W/COvn PLATE It 10, rF06W* 0 OR iuDs SLIP SCHEDULE SOUTH BASIN ILENGTH WIDTH 2 @ 18- DOCK A 11 LIPS 501 SLIPS @ is, DOCK A ss, SLIPS 10 9 @ 19'-7:' 2.@ 17'-l" DOCKS 40'SLIPS 1.7 14017' DOCK 6 i SO' SUPS 16 2@13'6" i @ 17-9 ° DOCK C 40' SLIPS 15 2 @ 17'. 1` 12 @ 17' 2 12'- V DOCK D 30' SUPS 16 12 Col 12L 2 @ 11-Al" TOTAL SLIPS - 16 Q32 40'SLI P5 . . . ....... . ........ ... . . .......... . . ..................... . CITY 2.7.. SO' SLIPS CITY10 SYSLIPSr TOTAL SLIPS = 85 TETRA TM'. , C, , 0 ab, S. � 4"o T! iE2a55.W3f — TO AN? PERSON(S) ?rrrHt)uT . ..... . . .... S0137R BASIN LAYOUT W/PILE C-4 CLEARWATER 0 r1' -I CORNER BUMPER 15" ALUM 8-CLEAT J'- T7P, OP 5 PER SLIP CORNER BUMPER SQ• PILE GUIDE ySEE SHEET C59 T- 0 f— 7 E v.??i SPACED " s EQUALLY 5}kCflT EQUALLY 60' SPACED SPACED ..; �f -'irl f.ON ' EQUALLY EQUALLY 7 L 2� EV r., r.. /V12 4 x" 0 L "4 2 _ _z, k �" - TIUS DRANMG CONTAINS, PROPRIRTARY INFORMATION WHICH 1S THE PIWPrJn'Y OF SAO&RlfAfi ('Rft IN-*- N 3. € 387A AND SHAD NOT RE COPIED, REPRODUCED OR MADE AVAOARLB TO ANY PERSON(S) wjTHODT CLEAT LAYO(j�_pQ$ PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT OF SROREHASTER INC. —_ ._...�_..- ..._„__ ....__._.......W. SLLiPS 50' AND LONGER d=WAtrW=XWIAMMX 9 -� Sr? ?E nc xErw rxcw wc. G3� "��e ry A -DOCK LAYOUT (SOtli`fi BA: I'I1AN VIEW , °1C� 8 _.,�' ______. — — DRA11N aY: �: G- �f SPFO} �lr 1.19 —h cA 9=� � nr ssaerArrt�raa tA1YHCdXIXC "' aBP DATE: 09 /illo8 - ---- - -' -'- e r To.15624950495 Jf7P6 JNTdRA/TIOA'.lL DR _._ SCALE L " =20' u °aVA4 E su4ossoxc raaor►aa _., s�srxa. w ., a rz�o. l�rcos , 1B ssaaa esse a mnirn �o aoan i=ln b OF 44 _.. ___............. _.. _ _ rrr- piai rr�,wAOFa�i Ran DESCxtwrrorr , APPa n .DOTS UFO #: C -5 CI,fiARWATE. 20" z 4D' SQ, PILE SEE MET C39 I CORNER 12, SPACED EQUALLY MODEL 1250 WAVE ATTENUATOR SEE SHEET Cj7 & C17.- 1. 0, 91 B-DOCK H 41- Tm--E 34''.1- .... -.I r- 34 MODEL 1250 WAVE ATTENUATOR SEE SHEET C17 & cia PLAN VIEW SCALE 1"=40' 16' ALM S-CLEAT Typ. OF 5 PER SUP - r CORNER BUMPER SPACED EQUALLY SPACED EQUALLY . I 4' x C GALY STEEL CORNER BRACE SEE SHEET C40 MODEL 400 CONCRETE DOCY SEE SHEET Clfi & CIO 34'-2' --- \_20- . 40' SQ PUY, (TYP. OF 21) 8' GALV STEEL I SEE SHEET C39 CORNER BRACE W/P= GUIDE SEE SHERT C39 TrTRA TM Ar XJrV"ZAYM AW"V"RMV fats "TffAWj7"w.L AR, 161A $M29 IS THE PROPERTY OF SHOREVASTER INC. E TO ANY PERSON(S) WITHOUT OF 44 1 -7' C-t3 euZR i ATER I I—T— F6' EQUALLY SPACED 0 4- EQUALLY E Aloe, SPACED EQUALLY SPACED EQUALLY Vo, IS88714 15'* ALUM S-CLEAT STATE OF SUPS 40- A TYP , OF 5 PER SLIP N Ft e. PLAN__ VIEW SCALE I"=30' 4' x C GALY STEEL CORNER BRACE SEE SHEET C40 MODEL 400 CONCRETE DOCY SEE SHEET Clfi & CIO 34'-2' --- \_20- . 40' SQ PUY, (TYP. OF 21) 8' GALV STEEL I SEE SHEET C39 CORNER BRACE W/P= GUIDE SEE SHERT C39 TrTRA TM Ar XJrV"ZAYM AW"V"RMV fats "TffAWj7"w.L AR, 161A $M29 IS THE PROPERTY OF SHOREVASTER INC. E TO ANY PERSON(S) WITHOUT OF 44 1 -7' C-t3 euZR i ATER C-DOCK - ------ 34'-0 15/16" ME PLAN VIEW SCALE I"=40 1/2' i 02-11 F Fu ��eik Mf L6* ALUM 9-CLEAT I URA TE04, ENC. Typ. OF 6 PER SLJP CORNER DUMPRMR CORNER BUMPER pluax pus 045.q Tliso'495CK T_ SPVACED SPACED EQUALLY I L 40' SPACED SPACED EQUALLY L EQUALLY 2' N-7p v TYP STA4 OF PIAN VIENY o4 M ..L A.......... to G\4 SCALE I"=20' ME PLAN VIEW SCALE I"=40 1/2' i 02-11 F Fu ��eik Mf is, x aw . Q . � PILE (TYP. OF 13) . cap 4' r 4' GALV STEEL CORNER BRkCR SHE sl(m 040 6' x S' GALV MTM. --CORNER BRACH W/PJLF GUIDE SEE SHEET C39 MODEL 400 CONCRETE DOCK SEE sum C23 A: C24 m OF SHOREVASTER Mc. SON(s) IrITHOUT )CK JAYOUT LSOUTII DA! C-7 CLEARWATFR AOVMAwwn I URA TE04, ENC. 045.q Tliso'495CK Ar v fr r'. S4205 k Aq B. ,cr ,s is, x aw . Q . � PILE (TYP. OF 13) . cap 4' r 4' GALV STEEL CORNER BRkCR SHE sl(m 040 6' x S' GALV MTM. --CORNER BRACH W/PJLF GUIDE SEE SHEET C39 MODEL 400 CONCRETE DOCK SEE sum C23 A: C24 m OF SHOREVASTER Mc. SON(s) IrITHOUT )CK JAYOUT LSOUTII DA! C-7 CLEARWATFR S' m 8' GAIV STEEL CORNER BRACE "US GUIDE SEE SHEET CSQ D—DOCK 0 0 1 140 tv� ...... oo A,4e, NO- 68974 v STATE OF PLAN VIEW SCALE 1"�Io' PLAN VIEW qrA.LR 1"=20' UL 2 nus T7 eRCl T Nr SBVI 'f i674935n�5 f '"RIVITY 4' z V GAIN STEEL CORNER BRACE SEE SEEM C40 DOCK Zinn nurser U41 Jmnu C24 4 IMICH Is TIM PROPERTY OF SHOMMAMR LIM. AWABLE TO ANY PERSOX{S) TMOUT Elm #: C-8 • PROFILE. VIEW SCALE 1"='30' Is' ALUM S-CLEAT 5/8' DIA. EOM, SIDE BUMPER THRU DOLT GALV, MUDED Y 5/8- DTA. THRU BOLT GALV. 1/2* GAIN. IM DOLT- F PROFILE CLEAT '16 WHALER SCALE 1'•2' 4ze WHALER I/O'GALV. HEX BOLT SCALE V-2' 12* ALUM S-CLEAT- 5/8* DIA. THEO HOLT GALV. EXTRUDED VIM SIDE ROWER 6/8- DI& THRV DOLT GALV. PROFILE CLEAT 2x8 WHALER SCALE 1'=1* 4X6 WRAJXR LT 1/2, GALV. HEX BG 7SECTION F-F SCALE t' = L' Jut, 9 -i 2'%ljc9 L THIS Jk=WJWMM AAW flam' TVTFtA TECH IBC.',' w CA 5MM BY 8B'2 Tlo":15167C_4 195-04 flied, s ilazlr ; I id. wx 4C. r > 2 Y WHICH 19 THE- .PROPERTY OF 9FOREUAMR INC. AVAIIABLE TO ANY MOON(S) MOLIT . .......... MARGINAL WALKWAY (SOUTH Rl DPAWN BY, DAM SHEur NO, 0- 9 OF _44 DW4 ADYliv WE Dyl C-9 CLEARWATE MARGINAL WALKWAY 1260 TIVE ATITNUATOR SHE SHEET C17 & Cill 20* x 40' SQ. PUZ OF 4) 10, a, xal MY. STEEL MODEL 400 CONCRETE DOCK CORNER BRACE W/PaZ GUIDE 0 CONCRETE S"'O 'T C19 & C20 SEE_ SHEET C37 C 'T C /sn Sm. 1 x 35' SQ, PHE . .. . .... MODEL 400 CONCRETE DOCK SEE SfWNT Gig coo M' ALUM S-CLEAT PLAN VIEW SCALE 1"=30' Q. 52' -11 . ........ . . .. _71 i, 1250 TAVF ATTENUATOR •2e*2" FREEBOARD MODEL 400 CONCRETE DOCK, FREEBOARD 4' x 4' GALV, STR&L__/ CORNER BRACE PROFILE. VIEW SCALE 1"='30' Is' ALUM S-CLEAT 5/8' DIA. EOM, SIDE BUMPER THRU DOLT GALV, MUDED Y 5/8- DTA. THRU BOLT GALV. 1/2* GAIN. IM DOLT- F PROFILE CLEAT '16 WHALER SCALE 1'•2' 4ze WHALER I/O'GALV. HEX BOLT SCALE V-2' 12* ALUM S-CLEAT- 5/8* DIA. THEO HOLT GALV. EXTRUDED VIM SIDE ROWER 6/8- DI& THRV DOLT GALV. PROFILE CLEAT 2x8 WHALER SCALE 1'=1* 4X6 WRAJXR LT 1/2, GALV. HEX BG 7SECTION F-F SCALE t' = L' Jut, 9 -i 2'%ljc9 L THIS Jk=WJWMM AAW flam' TVTFtA TECH IBC.',' w CA 5MM BY 8B'2 Tlo":15167C_4 195-04 flied, s ilazlr ; I id. wx 4C. r > 2 Y WHICH 19 THE- .PROPERTY OF 9FOREUAMR INC. AVAIIABLE TO ANY MOON(S) MOLIT . .......... MARGINAL WALKWAY (SOUTH Rl DPAWN BY, DAM SHEur NO, 0- 9 OF _44 DW4 ADYliv WE Dyl C-9 CLEARWATE 25, So' GANGWAY ROLLERS AND MINI RAW S' x 30' GANGWAY - - 30' FOR FDOT 8'-5' x a' FIXED LANDING 0, x 30' RAW - VFIM WHEEL CONN. ____ wxCOYER PIATE- GJ.l;V.VV "'IENIERLIN"E PER !NJTRAC,OAS11`1. VVAIER%A,Ay -MODEL 1250 WAVE ATTENUATOR 38*-a MODEL 400 CONCRETE FLOATING DOCK x 60* PwGKR PIER TYP OF 6 4- x 46' FINGER PIE Jh =ER Cak tAL W.A'IRWAY PER CHANNEL 03KN 77' MODEL 1250 WAVE ATTENIUATOR irAvs ATrENUATOR 25' 12, 57--l' • sa'•i 12 55, FINGER PIER DOCK A M.. OF 5 44, x j* MINI RAMP ` 7 50, . 100-2 A 60, 31, RAMP JJ PLAN VIEW L Q4„1 1 soul. I tr STATE OF a T tv Otto DOCK 8 7 21,1` LMMAUTAM AV I lla=W 00_ QA RT MAgAUMA AWMAWW yales 1"s"liproWiL "I ,'A BAr $M P"WIS jW AW rM#-AW r,?p-4s4,f TOTAL SLIPS QTY 17 45' SUP-5 QTY 14 50! SLIPS QTY to SS` SLIPS TOTAL SUPS = 41 10 WIDTH 2 @ &-6` 12 @ is, to @ is, 12 @ 17' 5 @17' TELP PROPERTY OF SlIOREVA-V91t MC, TO MNY PERSON(S) WIMOUT NORTH BASIN LAYOUT V C-10 CUARWATER • —10, Typ. OF DOCK B 8 701'- MODEL 400 CON 34'-I'l FLOATING DOCK 48�'-7" .... .. 4 45' FINGER PIER -1 34'- 1 OF 2 SLIPSCHEDULE TH BASIN Lffiqj� .. .. ............. DOCKA SO SLIP S 14 FMM WHYM W/COVER PLATE 55' SLIPS DOCKA 10 DOCK 45' SLIPS 12 JJ PLAN VIEW L Q4„1 1 soul. I tr STATE OF a T tv Otto DOCK 8 7 21,1` LMMAUTAM AV I lla=W 00_ QA RT MAgAUMA AWMAWW yales 1"s"liproWiL "I ,'A BAr $M P"WIS jW AW rM#-AW r,?p-4s4,f TOTAL SLIPS QTY 17 45' SUP-5 QTY 14 50! SLIPS QTY to SS` SLIPS TOTAL SUPS = 41 10 WIDTH 2 @ &-6` 12 @ is, to @ is, 12 @ 17' 5 @17' TELP PROPERTY OF SlIOREVA-V91t MC, TO MNY PERSON(S) WIMOUT NORTH BASIN LAYOUT V C-10 CUARWATER • SQ. PME 60' 20' PDX GUIDE I SEE SHM C39 WJkvF ArrKNUATOR A-DOCK /-m SHEET C15 u CIO 411 41' 4__L_41 - - - -j4,l'---J---------44'—j—ll OF 6 TYP., OF 6 1250 WAVE XITENUATOR SEE SUM ct7 & Cie 12* PLAN VIE W SCALE I"=40' ....... . ..... . ..... . ... _ . . . . . ................... . . . 0' r 0' GALV STEEL CORNER BRACE V/PlIE GUIDE SEE SHIV C39 +' x 4' GAIN STRID, CORNER BRACE SEE SHEET C40 41' 1260 WE ATTENUATOR_/ SE S C17 & C18 --w x so' SQ. P" (T.YP. OF 27) E UM 15' ALUM. S-CLEAT CORNER BUMPER TYP OF 5 PER SUP CORNER BUMPER Pax Z FILE--- Q:'-!l',! t.._-....:A T_ SPACED SPACED EQUALLY EQUALLY . . ..... L 50, SPACED SPACED X, EQUALLY EQUALLY Typ. -4H-W CLEAT L1YOfTT_pQT; SUPS PJAN VIEW SCALE I"=20' t �V i- ...- , f 140. BfpZE or Tf iv La • . ...... .... _B-DOCK _ m 1 V 4' x 4' GALV STEEL Typ. /-,-.CORNER BRACE SEE SHEET C40 TIP. 20' x 40' SQ. rns (TYP. OF 10) -MODEL 400 CONCRETE DOCK SEE SHEET C21 THRU Cl" 40' -11 ------ -- ------ -- 6, x 6' GALV. STEEL CORNER BRACE W/PFLE GUIDE PLAN VIEW SEE simm C39 SCAIX 1"=20' CORNER BUMPER VS* ALUM S-CLEAT TYP Typ. OF t PER SLIP I -CORNER BUMPER P,X— PILE- TIP. SPACED SPA cn EQUALLY.. 45' SPACED SPACED EQUALLY EQUALLY T" �pNDO L. ,4; 'Noe DRA'IfiNO i"Offia'UON VWMI is T" IIROFIFjny OF' SHOrakAsm INC. A" SHALL NOT BE COPIED, REPRODUCED OR MADE AVAILWIX TO ANY PEPSON(S) �nTEOUT g$874 T, rpmwwrm N CONSENT OF SHORKkASTER INC. --tt ImAga Slips 45* An IMIA 19CK 111r, B-7DOCK IAY0VT (NORTH BASIN BTATE ) 0r 40 DRAWN BY: ➢AT& /Do Ch SM. W" AX dw 6810 {At to 4 TO $0,49, 049t r VEW NO. a ax PLAN VIEW S61A915N9 rie AbM WMT TO SOM 12, OF 44 iiii sit, SOLE 14=20' 0) =::,,v V M blW YOU CMT LOI W DESCRWnON . . .. . ................ . . . .......... :rmyVAL - • • MAGINAL WALKWAY' MARGINAL WALKWAY -POST TENSIONED CORNER 40'- 11.1/2° TYF. I— PLAN VIEW SCALE 1 =5n 24° r 50' SQ. PILE (TYP. OF 3), 60' L250 WAVE ATPENUATOR SEE SHEET C1.7 k C18 MODEL 400 CONCRETE DOCK ALUMINUM TRUSS UINDING SEE SHEET CID k CIO 50' 18' x 35' SQ, PH,E _1 \_w z 60' (TYP. OF 8) ` SQ. PILE ..i d j x 8" ID r 3/4" MALL .- POST TENSIONED CORNER GALV, STEEL PIPE 3/4' GAM STEEL PETE POLYURETHANE BLOCK E° X 2' X 1/8' TURF r GALY, STEEL FRAME 9S HACKER HASHER .800 DIA. CABLE f..,- 3 1/4' r 3/8" HALL CONCRETE DOCK TALL SS PIPE O;T4 303 SS CAP PLUG 2' z 2' x 1/8" MHE .._.....,.._. ...... SHORE SIDE 'GALY.. STEEL FRAME WALKWAY '-' '.......- CAP GASKET CABLE LOCKER C8i13 GAM STEEL CHANNEL DETAIL B SECTION A —A SCALE 0 =1' SCATS 1' =4' it GRAY STARBOARD 1/2' THICK \.2" z 2' * 1/8" GAIN'. STEEL FRAME C8 r 13 GALV STEEL CHANNEL -4' z 8' z 24" FLOAT QTY L DRAW CONTADVS PROPRIETARY MORiL}TION WHICH M THE PROPERTY OF \\ SSEE DfiTAIIL AND SiALI. NOT HE COPIED, REPRODUCED OR M OE AVARAHLE TO ANY PERSONS A -WOOD - - - yQ, 6 &974 .0 .. PRIOR vRrrrFN CONSSN'r OF' SHOREiaumt In. _ __ C8 x 13 = _ tr�zrrv'rot E Oi reixn rEcrr INC, �I'.raip�N�"" aHORB SIDE GALV. STEEL. CHANNEL STA W +ni I n rer L :o.tn ■ - . :' °°�. r� #14"."95 aar s�seVSrtly errv°o.'ul dr ie °. DP Hap � PLAN VIEW afiF...�,� . } `�✓ "aye 377 rJS iU2Y ,ltd dOY Jdd I SCALE t • =4' Sf �_ SHEET NO. .,.N.ufi.rru� / ."M a%lJ.S,, fW ddJJJ -0J3R {1Nf N /i�a> Tss��sir 13 OF 4 • I n .se H Ahnim :C -13 INC. 18' x 95' SQ. PILE MARGINA4L WALKWAY (TYP. of 2) n a a 4' x 4' GALV. WEEL 4 "" CORNER BRACE (TYP -.) /""1280 WAVE ATTENUA'TOR SEE SHEET C40 45' SEE SHEET C17 & G18 - Ai0DE1 400 CONCRi3TE DOCK SEE - SHEET C10 & C20 10' ...�.48' -11.if - ll:�._49' -ii i%2`---- .•— .- 49' -.t.l 1 ... .... _W..... -._... ....- -- 941' -0 I/2' 20' x IIO' SQ. P s 20' z 40' SQ.. PILE ... (TYP. OF 2) PLAN _ VIEW T1 20" z (TYP. PILE 1250 WAVE ATTENTIATOR SCALE 1 " =80' SEE 9HEET C17 & CIS MODEL 400 CONCRETE DOCK 24" FREEBOARD 20' FREEBOARD SEE SHEEP C19& O CE PROFILE VIEW - SCALE 1 " =30' 15' ALUM S—CLEAT TYP. OF 5 PER SLIP CORNER BUMPER CORNER HVMPEH r 0 SPACED EQUALLY / o. !� SPACED SPACED EQUALLY h 3z� BQUAlLY D gp. 8@514 3 G' a 2' TYP ®AF Staui.� �`'G PLAN VIEW SCALE 1' =20' T8'1'RA. TMI INV- i �G'IC iU�i }' (ke $hd' SY -c 170 ,g 9 . i CA Stl&72 .L7' 9 szi U 56219SM" !08'Y . Fax 5G7 i5i SU1V i vrnvr.�c:ra:ac:�ecm t8iYS11S I MCH 79 THE F80PERTY OF SUOREMAS- ER aicC AVAUAHLE TO ANY PERSON(S) VITHOUT C -14 di � M- 2 7 i U9 F aF T8'1'RA. TMI INV- i �G'IC iU�i }' (ke $hd' SY -c 170 ,g 9 . i CA Stl&72 .L7' 9 szi U 56219SM" !08'Y . Fax 5G7 i5i SU1V i vrnvr.�c:ra:ac:�ecm t8iYS11S I MCH 79 THE F80PERTY OF SUOREMAS- ER aicC AVAUAHLE TO ANY PERSON(S) VITHOUT C -14 - X111 it 111 IIII1111III1GI IIII, III1 I) ititIIflIl_ itIIII�IIit IIIIII II IIit II 11 .111111 Ili � iJ'�� lI II Hill IIII11 1111IIII11111111I1IIII 1 H 111111 11 II 1111 II I) I I II II II 11 If II 1 ! II Illy tt It it it tf III! II II�11 II Il,ll II 11 II�II II II,II II�1111 �Il I Il il I1 L1 I /CONTJINUCUS 80 DLC TOTALLY ENCASED CABLE A (POST TENSIONED TO 16 II II II II II II II II III TONS) (TYP. OF 4) PLAN -f--17_2 VEW �ectia is =A' 6 ----{ i' LIiRING LUG LOCATION 7 Ltb"lYN'0 LUG LOCATION -ol' 3.00 DECK / _ 1.• _ i(TYP.) 4" 1 /4" I/4 "- - It i I I I �� I 3i ti 2' 1 1 4 -B" IJ... i'...-'_r2 I I 7' N8" 1 1 {-$' I I ii i 3 "' SIDE (FALL° - I I I I I 1 10' 5'r......_----- --'.t. �-------- -- " °- - �--- •- 10' END WALL t --3' INi'ERIOR WALL —3' 1N TRIOR WAIL 1 3" INTERIOR RALL 3'_g+ t* LEG WALL _ 6'-113" 4' -T -. D'- 8'. —.1. Ll PROFILE END VIEW Hum 1' -6l ROMA 1' =6' TOP SHAT HAVE A NON -SLIP BROOM nNISH E PVC SLEEVE FOR 7/8" DMA. THRU ROD 15' ALUM S -CLEAT 4" s 4" z 4 GA, WME MM UATS CONC. 3' DECK 5/8' DIA. GALV. THRIT ROD _}�.....___ _........ _.___- ._._, ••,� EXTRUDED VINYI. SIDE BUMPER ATTACH W /S•S. NAD3 b 6" O/C TOP Ac BOTTOM FREEBOARD !!! " (3)`j6 BAR EA. SIDE 2z8 WALER ........ --- 7 /3 BAR IN DECK 4z6 WALER ..._ —' '— — "..-........ -. .60' DL4. TOTAIJY ENCASED CABLE 4 -S' `.. PVC SUM r" FOR .80" DLI. CABLE (2) j6 BAR EA. SIDE �3' SIDE TAUS .�LB:/Cm M, MTN. f 10' �Ofl p�h POLYURETHANE COATED BOTTOM 'tip •' - "�C ,. AVERAGE THICKNESS .125" �'-7" NO. 74 a 4' LEG WALL �• : ,� .6 I (5) y3 BAR EA. SIDE i mrrimx S -rx't OF ''( TML TECN,iNG * jj C 0 N S4 N�_vla a� ar seoxex�sr� SECTION A -A T •Sc], 195cs M95 4tl967 rowe "rZAA Fu.5b2 /45.5029 S78NA4 Sam I - =3' w .uu w +. , + PAWZT rs rites r. i 1FBICH IS THE PROPERTY OF SHORRMASTER INC. AVADADLE TO ANY PERSON(S) VITHOLtT 12' x 41' WAVE ArtMAT(JR DRC MIN 9Y: AATE: REP tlp /56/n6„ 15 OF 44• i APPR l3AY'6' DNG #' C -15 C AT 0 (A) #3 BAR (P)LUTMG LUG SEE DETAIL A (TYP. OF 7/DOCK) G -\ (M. OF 4/DOCK) R 10.00 MIN - 1-_OVER up T =77= 1 /1 L P 1"MEM EVENLY G— PLAN VIEW SCALE 1"=8' 10.00 MN OM LAP I D7 PROFILE SCALE 1'=B' DO F- Ug) la BAR (Tyr. OF 8 /DOCK) M PVC COND'Urr CUTOUT TO ACCOMMODAT9 ELECTRICAL CONDUIT (j) f3 BAR 14- ta, BENT U SHAPE (A) #3 BAR (TYP. OF 7/DOCr)•,,_ (B) #0 BAR (TIT. OF 6/DOCK) (B) 00 BAR (TYP, OF 0 /DOCK) 1--APPROX IM OOd -(S) END CAGE 2 OCK #6 BAR (TYP. OF (C) 4/DOCK) D120.00 (T) 16 W nT. OF 10/DOCK) (C) #6 BAR END VIEW all W. SCALE .=a, (TYP, OF 1O/DOCK) P 1"MEM EVENLY G— PLAN VIEW SCALE 1"=8' 10.00 MN OM LAP I D7 PROFILE SCALE 1'=B' DO F- Ug) la BAR (Tyr. OF 8 /DOCK) M PVC COND'Urr CUTOUT TO ACCOMMODAT9 ELECTRICAL CONDUIT (j) f3 BAR 14- ta, BENT U SHAPE (A) #3 BAR (TYP. OF 7/DOCr)•,,_ (B) #0 BAR (TIT. OF 6/DOCK) WDRELS VMNLY SPACE D•/ (N) #8 BAR 126, LC. SECTION F-F SCAL9,I'=3' . . ... . .. . .. . . ............................. . — ENDED POLYSTYRENE mwlf-3.50 �-I.ea f-4.25 inn On (o 4• l 44 BAR 8. L 2800 � 2 1-84.00--- 64,00 DETAIL PART L nfm 10.00-t DETAIL PART K DETAIL PART It 9.00 BENT ROD DETAILS SCALE 1*=4' DETAIL A SCALE I'-W ............. . . . . THIS DRAIVING CONTAINS, PROPRIETARY INFORAU11ON WHICH IS THE PROPEM OF MR&MAM NO. 68874 AND SIIALL NOT BE COPIED REPRODUCED - OR MADE AVAUBM To ANY PRRSOx(S) wrrfjouT wo PMOR'UMEN CONSENT OF SHOP29ASTER INC. 80 tClDkA'tiYlOU'tNf.S'At'L7lt I STATE V ,INC. r3 n 12' 1 if) IM ATMATOR i kx DRAWN BY, DAT& L.V. P-0, CA Mr, pr Tmt5aqq5ojqs "ORS JNid'Rh'ATlOeti:rL D17, .. 8 OF 44 (000) us-dsys Woo DWG #: C-16 CLE, AAr-&M JP-4 REV • (B) 00 BAR (TYP, OF 0 /DOCK) 1--APPROX IM OOd -(S) END CAGE 2 OCK #6 BAR (TYP. OF (C) 4/DOCK) D120.00 (T) 16 W nT. OF 10/DOCK) (C) #6 BAR END VIEW (TYP. OF OF 4 /DOCK) (T) #5 BAR SCALE .=a, (TYP, OF 1O/DOCK) WDRELS VMNLY SPACE D•/ (N) #8 BAR 126, LC. SECTION F-F SCAL9,I'=3' . . ... . .. . .. . . ............................. . — ENDED POLYSTYRENE mwlf-3.50 �-I.ea f-4.25 inn On (o 4• l 44 BAR 8. L 2800 � 2 1-84.00--- 64,00 DETAIL PART L nfm 10.00-t DETAIL PART K DETAIL PART It 9.00 BENT ROD DETAILS SCALE 1*=4' DETAIL A SCALE I'-W ............. . . . . THIS DRAIVING CONTAINS, PROPRIETARY INFORAU11ON WHICH IS THE PROPEM OF MR&MAM NO. 68874 AND SIIALL NOT BE COPIED REPRODUCED - OR MADE AVAUBM To ANY PRRSOx(S) wrrfjouT wo PMOR'UMEN CONSENT OF SHOP29ASTER INC. 80 tClDkA'tiYlOU'tNf.S'At'L7lt I STATE V ,INC. r3 n 12' 1 if) IM ATMATOR i kx DRAWN BY, DAT& L.V. P-0, CA Mr, pr Tmt5aqq5ojqs "ORS JNid'Rh'ATlOeti:rL D17, .. 8 OF 44 (000) us-dsys Woo DWG #: C-16 CLE, AAr-&M JP-4 REV • is' ALUM S-CLEAT MIM YM M. fit I"ll- I_ jul'y 11"Intillim CONTINUOUS .CO' DIA. TOTALLY ENCASED LE CAD (POST TENSIONED TO 18 TONS) (TYP. OF 4.) PLAN VIEW v -Am "'0' (Tylp'.) z-LUIMG LUG LOCATION r S' DECK oil - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 3' END WALL 3. p4mIOR WALL 4" x 4" x 4 GA. WIRE MESH PRQ—FILE samz 11"• CONC, F 3' DECK D to BAR E� SIDE • 7 13 BAR IN DECK V-5- 0, fl, (2) #6 BAR M SIDE STAT E OF sY OR lbl D' I T \-POLYURETHANE COATED BOTTOM AVERAGE THICKNESS .126' ul (3) #a BAR EA. SIDE --1 1-4- 194G 'WALL 1 LUG LOCATION 7 7/8'- 1`:- 7.5/10" 4• -5• 3' SIDE WALL - !`- Mimi 4" LEG. WALL_ MIM YM M. fit I"ll- I_ jul'y 11"Intillim CONTINUOUS .CO' DIA. TOTALLY ENCASED LE CAD (POST TENSIONED TO 18 TONS) (TYP. OF 4.) PLAN VIEW v -Am "'0' (Tylp'.) z-LUIMG LUG LOCATION r S' DECK oil - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 3' END WALL 3. p4mIOR WALL 4" x 4" x 4 GA. WIRE MESH PRQ—FILE samz 11"• CONC, F 3' DECK D to BAR E� SIDE • 7 13 BAR IN DECK V-5- 0, fl, (2) #6 BAR M SIDE STAT E OF sY OR lbl D' I T \-POLYURETHANE COATED BOTTOM AVERAGE THICKNESS .126' ul (3) #a BAR EA. SIDE --1 1-4- 194G 'WALL 1 LUG LOCATION 7 7/8'- 1`:- 7.5/10" LYE A )OM FINISH 2 7 /--PVC SUM FOR 7/8' DIA. THRU ROD DIA, GALV, THRU ROD -1,_MffRUDKD VRM SIDE BUMPER ATUCH. W/S,S* NAILS 0 8- O/C TOP & BOTTOM \-2x8 WALUR \ I'd WALER -.60' DIA. TOTALLY ENCASED CABLE -PVC SLEEVE FOR .60* DLO. CABLE * SIDE WALLS EXPANDED POLYSTIM" .05 Is./Cu. FT. MM SECTION A—A SCALE 1*=3, A 7 7/8- a 4'-5 END VIEW SCIT 1'.6• J • 4• -5• 3' SIDE WALL - !`- 4" LEG. WALL_ LYE A )OM FINISH 2 7 /--PVC SUM FOR 7/8' DIA. THRU ROD DIA, GALV, THRU ROD -1,_MffRUDKD VRM SIDE BUMPER ATUCH. W/S,S* NAILS 0 8- O/C TOP & BOTTOM \-2x8 WALUR \ I'd WALER -.60' DIA. TOTALLY ENCASED CABLE -PVC SLEEVE FOR .60* DLO. CABLE * SIDE WALLS EXPANDED POLYSTIM" .05 Is./Cu. FT. MM SECTION A—A SCALE 1*=3, A 7 7/8- a 4'-5 END VIEW SCIT 1'.6• J • (A) j9 BAR {P)I.I @R714G LUG SEE DETAIL A. (TYP. OF 7/DOCK) (Tm OF 4/DOCK)� 1 D.OD dl S- E-j j F AFPROX 120.00 D•, 'I1s�w.�ni�a♦ ��i�311t♦t♦ GJ PLAN VIEW SCALE 1" =8' PROFILE SCALE 1' =S' p0 `v r..:. F (.B) j8 BAR.,! (TYP. OF BfDOCK) (B) }'8 BAR 28IOp 28 DD (TYP' OF 8/DDCKj 1.5.00 DETAIL FART L I-^APPROX .120.00- (S) END CAGE —f• 25,pD 2 OCK !! 15.00.4— t BS!00 DETAIL PART K. I t 80.00 27.00 DETAIL PART M (C) 116 BAR `�T BENT ROD DETAILS (TYP. OF 4 /DOCK) SCALE 1 " =4' (T) /8 BAR END .VIEW (TYP. OF O/DOCB) SCALE i'=B'� -j �-5.00 LG, Al %AIL _ .r.;,. Tf A S9.Dp ANao C' 91 " °s j MO. 68974 Rl - STATE OF rVTRAi BCH INC. •• jj I t362�756/45 , • , !isle 1. • 'LNG � � r- S!749S.W79 wxn.ar4 ��scP :�ry � ::::::� ate` •i�'il�iril E-j j F AFPROX 120.00 D•, 'I1s�w.�ni�a♦ ��i�311t♦t♦ GJ PLAN VIEW SCALE 1" =8' PROFILE SCALE 1' =S' p0 `v r..:. F (.B) j8 BAR.,! (TYP. OF BfDOCK) (B) }'8 BAR 28IOp 28 DD (TYP' OF 8/DDCKj 1.5.00 DETAIL FART L I-^APPROX .120.00- (S) END CAGE —f• 25,pD 2 OCK !! 15.00.4— t BS!00 DETAIL PART K. I t 80.00 27.00 DETAIL PART M (C) 116 BAR `�T BENT ROD DETAILS (TYP. OF 4 /DOCK) SCALE 1 " =4' (T) /8 BAR END .VIEW (TYP. OF O/DOCB) SCALE i'=B'� -j �-5.00 LG, Al %AIL _ .r.;,. Tf A S9.Dp ANao C' 91 " °s j MO. 68974 Rl - STATE OF rVTRAi BCH INC. •• jj I t362�756/45 , • , !isle 1. • 'LNG � � r- S!749S.W79 wxn.ar4 ��scP :�ry (q) PVC CONDUIT CUTOUT TO ACCOMMODATE CO"' (A) /8 BAR ELECTRICAL (TYP. OF 7 /DOCK) D (I) je BAR. 14" LG..4� _ BENT U SHAPE (B) j'8 BAR (TYP. OF 8/DOCK) (C) j8 BAR (TYP. OF 4/DOCK) (T) j8 BAR, (TYP. OF 8/1)OCK) ANDED POLYSTYRENE 9. �1'MTN ,- -PART A (K) BENT L SHAPE -•i {-1.00 MIN `\ 1►HEEL.S 6 BAR SPACED,- / — v / PART B (N) i8 BAR 128" LG. �� 4.00 SECTION F —F L SCALE 1' =9' THIS DRAWING CONTAR45, FROPRIDTARY WORIUTION wm(;H IS THE rRorERTY~OF SIIORBMASPER INC. AYD SHALL NOT BA COPIER}, REPRODUCED OR WIDE AVAILABLE TO ANY PERSON(S) InTROUT PRIOR WRITTEN CUNSS iT OF SRORF:WA,SM ItiC" �G 3CfiC�(r3 _..._ —i__. - i 12' 100' 1.09 ATWATOR MWORCI nr.swoA'A!isJdx &s'cri'lrivN& -._..— .._.. -.,, DRUf1i�BY: DATE: i024r lA9Y'IiXArZ0X I Ji a, – _.. ._.i__.AFTP313 YO � MAT 1' 2 Bar Se9. rrecus r� c AW jrow.- -?" _.. --.._.... 18 OF 44 reap.,) sie earn' DATE F RUAT 12 18 O8 DWG rts.) re -e&v Env , nESCMI'TIoN AFPR O DATE i #' C -18 C V r 15' ALUM | 37 i 00 ^ z��x�� -��wmm�mTONS) (TYP. OF 2) °l.00 END WALL EN W-2 . — 4' x^^ x^ GA. WIRE MESH MATS � PLAN INTERIOR WALL T PROFILE TOP SHALL HiVE A NON-SLU` BROOM FINISH PVC SLEEVE FOR ?/B- DIA. THRU ROD BED VJM'L SIDE BUMPER Arri 2' DECK #a BAR EA. SIDE #3 BAR IN 4xe WALES 2- SIDE WALLS �,110 At POLYURETHANE COATED Borrom At AVERAGE TmcmSS Pi AUNSM EXPANDED POLYSrYRFN9 401 E 0— utmll S. 470 4;/ TO SVAMOS 6- INc TO ANY PERSON(S) TMOUT C-19 ''vxo|nv'umon'mmxvwx|on'./~`'~vm.xvmx"/^x.o""'v.vx.xp/p'|/V/w»�x|v,/|xfu./',o.x>xp'p'�ofx z��x�� -��wmm�mTONS) (TYP. OF 2) °l.00 END WALL EN W-2 . — 4' x^^ x^ GA. WIRE MESH MATS � PLAN INTERIOR WALL T PROFILE TOP SHALL HiVE A NON-SLU` BROOM FINISH PVC SLEEVE FOR ?/B- DIA. THRU ROD BED VJM'L SIDE BUMPER Arri 2' DECK #a BAR EA. SIDE #3 BAR IN 4xe WALES 2- SIDE WALLS �,110 At POLYURETHANE COATED Borrom At AVERAGE TmcmSS Pi AUNSM EXPANDED POLYSrYRFN9 401 E 0— utmll S. 470 4;/ TO SVAMOS 6- INc TO ANY PERSON(S) TMOUT C-19 N ----------- rt SEE L;MG LUG DETAIL A (ITP. or 4/DOCK) C PROFILE SCAM 1*=5' --I � (0) JS BAR 7/DOCK J) 13 BAR 14` -LG. DENT u SHAPE (A) fig BAR OF 0 /DOCK) (B) 08 13AR (TYP. OF 8 /DOCK) E,V" -,40. , NO &987q STATE OF MESA 10.00 WN OVER LAP (B) #6 BAR (TYP. or 6/DOCK) 3. 1'- 1— 1.88 N OCK) (A) #a B" (N) END CAGE TYP. OF 6/DOCK) (2/DO-) END VIEW SCALEI"=5' —PART B (L) 13EM L SHOE nrrrw�wwwwwrrrr ifkgi#,�V 1.50 -j 3.00 j a Sm OF Wfamis/ . 4.75J � (D) it BAR 102- LG. UCTION, F-F SC" 1'.3, TMATI.H•Mr• 1 I-IM.N.CA"M Ar &901 Id !6Z4115.049S I t"d6 j 1 "ks= 4—#4 BAR 6' W. 1 30,00 9.00 DETAIL A SCAM 1"=3' IS THE PROPERTY OF SHOREMASTER WC. E TO &NY PznsoN(s) WIMOUT T— , - 60, —lumfly Rm.-r-- #-'C-20 Y�LEN' T FINISHED PART VESCRIPION Lilt 570.(Y,) ........ . ........ 138. 0 0 FI 4 72.�Lq b., *3316 43 I?s fz..- r.aw, Grade 60 Zcann mant) —c—'et. t0 FOn fiats End q� Celle L q (A) fig BAR OF 0 /DOCK) (B) 08 13AR (TYP. OF 8 /DOCK) E,V" -,40. , NO &987q STATE OF MESA 10.00 WN OVER LAP (B) #6 BAR (TYP. or 6/DOCK) 3. 1'- 1— 1.88 N OCK) (A) #a B" (N) END CAGE TYP. OF 6/DOCK) (2/DO-) END VIEW SCALEI"=5' —PART B (L) 13EM L SHOE nrrrw�wwwwwrrrr ifkgi#,�V 1.50 -j 3.00 j a Sm OF Wfamis/ . 4.75J � (D) it BAR 102- LG. UCTION, F-F SC" 1'.3, TMATI.H•Mr• 1 I-IM.N.CA"M Ar &901 Id !6Z4115.049S I t"d6 j 1 "ks= 4—#4 BAR 6' W. 1 30,00 9.00 DETAIL A SCAM 1"=3' IS THE PROPERTY OF SHOREMASTER WC. E TO &NY PznsoN(s) WIMOUT T— , - 60, —lumfly Rm.-r-- #-'C-20 PLAN VIEW 5 3A* - 21 BkcK f V-2 5/8-_ 4- .... . ..... . . ...... . 2* Unmon WALL END WALL SECTION B--°B SCALE 1"=5, *0 . Sr f , TFrRA TECH, INC. ,13 " , . STATE OF 0 ti SECTION A-A 49S.-SU7.9 SCALE 1,-2, 7/1. 7 7/.- r 7 5/18*1 . . ....... - -------- -- Z' END WALL END VIEW SCAM il=51 THIS AND j., 7 2,0109 kupi-iry AE RHOR&MhSiKEI Vic. P os 0 li (S) WrMOUT 8' x 29' WALKWAY DETAILS i D"WN BY, DATE, Dup sfaw No. Icy—. 21 OF kk . . .... C-21 CL EARWAI.ER TOP SHALL HAVE A W ALUM S-C=T--\, t' x 4' 6 GA. -NON-SLIP BROOM FDMH WW MESH MATS VC.SLE M. FOR 7/8- DIA. THRU ROD /� 6/8" DLL, GALV, THAV ROD EXTRUDED VUM SIDE BUMPER ATTACK DECK- ir/s.s. NAW o/c Top & BoTrom zo*:E2* FREESOARD #5 BAR EA. SIDE 2X8 VALER 4 4XG WALER DUL TOTALLY ENCASED CABLE .60' j6o� C , PVC SLEEVE FOR .8V DES. CABLE a if) BAR NA, SIDE 2 2. SIDE ' SIDIE VALLS p4,D 0 Ik POLYURETHANE COATED BOTTOM AVERAGE THICKNESS J25 140. MANDED POLYS7YP"E -.95 LB./Cu, Fm Nw. *0 . Sr f , TFrRA TECH, INC. ,13 " , . STATE OF 0 ti SECTION A-A 49S.-SU7.9 SCALE 1,-2, 7/1. 7 7/.- r 7 5/18*1 . . ....... - -------- -- Z' END WALL END VIEW SCAM il=51 THIS AND j., 7 2,0109 kupi-iry AE RHOR&MhSiKEI Vic. P os 0 li (S) WrMOUT 8' x 29' WALKWAY DETAILS i D"WN BY, DATE, Dup sfaw No. Icy—. 21 OF kk . . .... C-21 CL EARWAI.ER N J10,00 MIN-1 1— OVER UP MESH 10.00 ir LAP \-I �A) #5 BAR IJ/ PLAN VIEW n-P. OF 6,'DOCK) J. SCMY 1'=6 10.00 k" —APPROX 87.00-- �K- N-1 :7APPROX 87.0�� 1 9 f-1-11 r P K J SEE UFTING LUG DETAIL A, T c (TYP. OF 4/DOCK) ... - I A 1 6 1 410XII Retm, #5.626E xy Coated Grmdr CO S PMOR'WRnMM COMMT OF SHUREWTER LNC. M.00 Iy C*atod (5mdp 60 'I MOO 4.0 . 4.0 . 4M x 6 Ga. Mesh 3 62.00 R•tw W 625 Epoxy Coated Grade K . ....... . . I 240,CIJ 4.0 x 4,0 x 0&0 It 6 Ga, Mash F I DAM 24a co 4,0x 4.0 Y. e5t x 6 Ca M6141 G I 220 .00 4:0 X 4.0 1 95.0 x 6 Ga. Mesh H 200.00 41) x 4,0 x 95.0 x t Ga Mew) 1 SHEET NO. 22, OF Rebar, 19.5CR Epoxy Coaiwt G.nda 61 i --7K- In (UuqI5046) �!h G& Uflirj c?,l 45.0 u)-N 4. W Rebar#3,375Epcvj Coated Gfpdeb� VA 00 Ovidult P(pe, 1.0_P c &c-•:40 Is- 30,00 Rebar 4�1-35 5 S.wxy � a- Grade 60 4 ... 7 —CAIWwn mmint sLa.-":qal walkwav fCwmmmnOl ..... . ...... 0 STATE OF ' N_.(Il) 05 BAR -C (TYP. OF 6/DOCK) EXPANDED POLYSTYRENE DENT U -\ (A) #5 a�rE C-\ TP, OF 8/DOCK) -\ \ 3'78• L (D) 05 BAR-/ (TM OF 8 /DOCK) (A) #5 BAR (a) END CAGE (TTP. OF a/DOCK) (2 /DOCK) -Z on END VIEW 5CAUJ.'=6' [-3.50 -...11-.- ,.-PART B (M) SEW L SHAPE ION t.50-i - j 3.00 2 WHEELS (D) #5 BAR 4-75 SECTION F—F scm I'-:V 4-#4 BAR a W. —7 1 9.00 DETAIL A scmx, 1'=3' C-22 • TIES DRAWLNG COIMMS, PROPRIETARY WORMAT10144 -WRICU IS M '.PROPERTY OF SROREM&SM INC- AND SHAU.:NUT BE COPIES. REPRODUCED OR MADE AMU= To ANY PERSON(S) MMOUT PMOR'WRnMM COMMT OF SHUREWTER LNC. 'rrl'AA TtCk4 INC, go, wk WAY REWFORCKM MUWK W DAM I'v 9-1, C-� Vca'ol JrAimz—r"V ssp 00/19/08 Td 562.495IMS 5;249 5529 Ptx P9Y 339 SHEET NO. 22, OF 'Wir 91 C-22 • 'CONTINUOUS .000* DIA, TOTALLY ENCASED CABLE (POST TRN910NO TO is TONS) (TYP. OF 2) .PLAN YLIEW -el-a IN—. 7 6/10" a 1/2 4. SCALE f1=61 Tyr. 7 7/6' TV.) [2' DECK 6/8. 7 5/16- 02. 2' END WALL WALL �--2 a. INTERIOR WALL 2- END WALL ND VIEW SEQLIQ�='B-B SCAT 1'=6' TOP SHALL HAVE A NON-SP BROOM FINISH 4' x 4" x Is Gk WMWE MESH MMATS U IS A" S-CLEAT- PVC SLEFVK FOR 7/8- nLA_ TTIRU ROD I_ 6/8- DUL GALV. THRU ROD . . .......... . . . . . . . .... ............... EXTRUDED VINYL SIDE BUMIW ATTACH, NAILS 0.0" O/C TOP 1307TOM . ... ....... CO a 1712MOARD 2xd WALER #5 BAR EA, SIDE \1�4:xa HALER -.80* DIA. TOTALLY ENCASED CABLE PVC SLEEVE FOR 60" DIA. CABLE is BAR PA. SIDE 2* SIDE WALE 00 mo POLYURSTHANZ COATED BOTTOM AVERAGE TmCxffESS 126* 140. 66874 EXPANDED POLYSTYRENE STATE OF .05 LB. /CU. Fr. KIN. . ' SECTION A-A ......... * SCALE I'=2• • SCALE 1*=6' IOCK) 599. 50 -------- (A) #5 BAR (N) END CAGE 10.00 JdIN I—APPROX (TYP, OF 8/DOCK) (2/DOCX) OVER LAP 0 ft ftl -1 40.00 40.00 ............ . ..... . C F DFILE (B) BAR � I SEE LIFMG LU DVWL A C. (B) #5 UR C m m7A, � (TYP. OF 4 /DOCK) C. SCAM 11=5, —UM 10.00 MIN (TYP. OF 8/DOCK) OVER I" END VIEW Srkl'Rj'=5' ITEM I QTY LENGTH FINISHED PART DESCRIPION A � a 500,00 Rel-I., 4'5.625 Epoxy Caaj&o Gode CO a G 570.0-D Will Ims Ga 0 W. DP RaLSf AS .C25 Epoxy C..td Gift 60 no son 4,0 X 4.0 X 95,0 X 6 Ga, MeSh 740'M 4.0 x 4,ox 95.2i (I 2 138,00 a.0 x 4O . 950 x U Go- Mesh 72�00 Epoxy C.U:,A Grade M . ........... ... . ....... - 1.r im-h Gat 0tin3 Wq 37.9 Loral (LJQg16032) J 112 °. a.00 ............. Robar #3,375 EM-Leat---Grade 61— U Cc 0 10i'ft pit., 1.0 Par Soh a0 ILL 16 1200 R_,bw ff3.375 Egan Comm G�, 50 ... . ... .. . .... — Mount Sil-1,11d Yyall-a2 (Canna linit) .. . .. ........ 40, NO. 68ST4 MTE W 0 R 144 ......... .. o rM l319WWAUfJ.11S TETRA ICll. CA Mal Pr MMAMws= .:51 @45 tH75 f4P6 A7jzwrl"Xz PINT .04r $sa jwzcr t4* Ay iaw-gla 4-04 BAR 6 W. SBAa DETAIL A SCALE 1'=3' THE PROPERTY OF SUMMASTIR INC. TO ANY PERSON(3) WITHOUT GDP C-24 u I* TV. OF 6 DUCK) -7-= Will Ims 0 m no son 0 munnummialm riiiiririlirr I r cirri /.o/iir/! nNammaNissummusin (D) J5 BAR l319WWAUfJ.11S TETRA ICll. CA Mal Pr MMAMws= .:51 @45 tH75 f4P6 A7jzwrl"Xz PINT .04r $sa jwzcr t4* Ay iaw-gla 4-04 BAR 6 W. SBAa DETAIL A SCALE 1'=3' THE PROPERTY OF SUMMASTIR INC. TO ANY PERSON(3) WITHOUT GDP C-24 u I* 4 3f8 4 7/6-..1' CONN. END VIEW SCALE 1,=e . . . .... . ....... ............... .............. . ....... . ...... . . ........... Li B CONTINUOUS .500' DLC TOTALLY ENCASED CABLE PLAN VIEW (POST TrNsfom) (TYP OF 2) SCALE 1'=4* 8/4. .-- 2'-8' LIFTING ilia CUT OUT 14 a 1/2- I (TY11.) F2' DECK IA 6/8- Ma NUTS TYP 2 01,00 0 /-UFTrNG LUG CUT OUT • OF //- — : B 1/2 . trrrEN CON99NT OFMOMAMR INC. ' 4 x So' FINGER DETA 12, 4 1 6 VALXR � 2. 7. -- (2) tO BAR EA. SIDE DAM * Av41Mt'lv" u up 0 . .................. ... . . . . EPDXY COATED zr &F REUT IT ....... ... ........ . . DITHRIOR WAIUS jo 2" Kn WALL 4" x 4' x 4 GA. GALV: W= MESH MATS 12' ALUM, S-CLEAT ON FINGER EXTRUDED VINYL SIDE BUMPER ATTACH II /S.S. NAILS 0 6- O/C TOP & BOTTOM SECTION A—A SCALE i"=4' TOP HAVE A wdm3p1V1P "ROOM FINISH ,C SLEM, FOR 6/0' DfA. THRU ROD 10 ONO. CK 5/8- DUL. GALV. THRU ROD Tk SLEEVE FOR .60" DLL CABLE �ovl� DUL TOTALLY XNCAM CABLE JUL 2 7 4 3/8'-11 —2, END WALL END VIEW SCALE I'=4* WNG CONTAINS, PROPRIETARY RiMRMAMN WHICH IS THE PROPERTY OF SnOVRlw-m INC. :L NOT BE COPIED, AR PRODUCED OR WE AVARADLE TO ANY PERSON(S) iffROUT trrrEN CON99NT OFMOMAMR INC. ' 4 x So' FINGER DETA 12, 4 1 6 VALXR � Z' SIDE WALL -- (2) tO BAR EA. SIDE DAM * Av41Mt'lv" u up 0 00/18 EPDXY COATED zr &F REUT IT jo Tms m `10, (91 fO BAR F.A. PA. SIDE D SH PRIOR I EPDXY COATED POLYURETU&NII COATED BOTTOM AVERAGE THICKNESS .126, STATE op EXPANDED POLYSTYRENE TETRA TL cf, ""'c TETRA r aw! qn CA 91JW7 . Tel W495AMS "mrA fONAL ' SECTION B ---h— 1.1- 4 3/8'-11 —2, END WALL END VIEW SCALE I'=4* WNG CONTAINS, PROPRIETARY RiMRMAMN WHICH IS THE PROPERTY OF SnOVRlw-m INC. :L NOT BE COPIED, AR PRODUCED OR WE AVARADLE TO ANY PERSON(S) iffROUT trrrEN CON99NT OFMOMAMR INC. ' 4 x So' FINGER DETA R-_' D DRAWN BY, D DAM * Av41Mt'lv" u up 0 00/18 zr &F REUT IT • r illlll ' -F PLAN VIEIY ✓6.ao _(P) BNB CAGE � + PART A #p BAR SCALE 1. " =0' (TYP. OF 2) ��.._ _.. .309.00 — .._.... -._ R _ r 3o.uo _ % f{ ��-I OVERLAP J � TYP. SEE LIFTING RING DETAM A (TYP. OF 4JDOCK) 1 3 a SdS.rJO RAhat FNi .750 E;,nx r�Cua ?ed Grade 60 4.0 x 360 x 4 Ga _ Mash O 7 M.00 Rehar i0 .675 Etrxy Goatcrl C>ra0c 84 _ E 210.30 _ 4.0 -x 4.0 z 73.0 z 4 Ga, Most. ± 2,58 4.0 x 4.0 A 73.0 x 4 Ga. Mes`+ ir G 2 170_.4 d0x4.0x73.4xd8a.htsh H ? 46.50 4,0 x h >0 z 3n 4 x 4 Gtr lfesh 4 "'•` _ LiP,IM L�.c, 1.6' X3 Ga;v J 12 14.-4 Rems 93:376 c¢cxy Cnaated Grade 6^, K 14 41.W nzndw! Piix 1.0 Pr Sch 40 L_ 2 K13° Ext Vut tit i 7. ..,, N 2 30'0u RtIb ar «s .875 Eimr.�,• Costae. Omeg 30 Cannon Mo',,ni .3. X 3 Plate Ftnger O 2 a Comma M.Mnls End FiNer P 1 °.•• 4 Foci Er�j Cs0e G 4'X4'sa GA. MESH G SEE LIFTING LUG DL'1'AIG aFL011 (TYP. OF 4JDOCH) . PROFILE. SCALE 3' -5' a /a• w NM 'PYP. 0k' Y t-- 4a.00— 36.00 _ -M 50,00 10.00 --i G PART B #6 BAR. —(TYP. OF 2). END VIEW SCALE 1' -s` 44 4�C E NSF r�t:i = t1O. 68674 o STATE OF PAI . . BAR i.6t H C PART 8 I N - #3 BAR 14' LG. LtFIING LUG 11 PART I I 1.00 mw 37.00 {11) NS #S BAR 36' LG. I PART 'B" #8 BAR _ 0.00 }--. 1.60 3 KEE$15 SEC'T'ION . G —G DETAIL A SCALE 1' -Z' -6" SCALE 1' =2' _ 7F:IAATECH INC. ' �4i a0-- BHA — V"<zn L—P, 3 rIl CA iEem Br,SYX71 T m 50..174A,95 Ides, a�rr532.i9'z�2Y SBOREk.LS'PER ItiC. WITHOUT OF 44 #' C -2G 4' -- S-O 5/8 "- 4 $ /8" T 1 7/8J 4� CONN. END VIEW SCAM 1"-V tONTINUOUS .600" DII TOTAUoY ENCASED .GABLE (POST TENSIONED) (TYP,. 00 2) _j QJA. -3 1/2" 7--1 J- 4' x 8 GA. CAM WIRE MESH MATS 15* AMU. S-CLEAT ON FINGER MMUDFD VINYI, SIDE BUUPER ATTACH W/S.9, NAILS 6 V O/C Top & BOTTOM -"— 1 1/2- PLAN -VIEW SCALE 1 " =4' LUG CUT OUT SECTION A-A SCALE 1'-4' L HAVE A BROOM FINISH PVC SLEM FOR 6/0- DLL TuRv ROD -5/8- DIA. CAM TMW ROT) SLEEVE FOR XD' DIA. CABLE DM TOTALLY ENCASED CAME NV— 4' IL . 0 VALM -/ —2, SIDE WAU (2) #6 BAR EA, SIDE EPDXY COATED 0 a. .......... E 12) 10 BAR EA. SIDE NO� 68874 RPM COATED POLYURXTHAME. COATED BOTTOM w AVERAGE THICMSS .125, STA-TE OF EXPANDED POLYSTYRENE7"Tz 11 4 .95 IB./CU. FT. (MIN.) SECT ON -8{ 70 MAL 0, SCALE 11=21 I V INTERIOR WALLS 8" _JA LUG CUT OUT 8 f/2- 3/4' r id, . T-- 4 y.... . . . .......... 7/8- FEUMIZ LOOP INSERT Lt TYP. OF 2 END VIEW SCALE 1'=4' f WHICH IS TRY, PROPERTY or SHORHMA -m INC. AVAII.KBIX TO AINY PEMON(S) WITHOUT C-27 IETFM TIC11, 111C. 401 � 0 a�., S,; 4M Ld4 Z-1, CA "M -WoRawds"N mwfht AV TO 561AM0406 AR. F. S614".W79 WN % II) V-431r, f WHICH IS TRY, PROPERTY or SHORHMA -m INC. AVAII.KBIX TO AINY PEMON(S) WITHOUT C-27 \-I[ F 4-/ (4) END CAGE-/ PART A. Ili BAR (TYP. OF 4) PLAN VIEW SCALE i'=ti* . . ........ —479.50— 4' x t' x 8 GA. MESH P 0-.-- / f p.00 OVERLAP G c J ....... ...... . . . . . . . ...... NINE not G. "K G 4' x 4'.x a GA. MESH- - SEE UYMG Luc SMALL, A PROFILE (TYP. OF 4/DOCK) SCAM i"=5• ITFM QTY LENGTH --iINISH-ED PART DESCRIPION I A 470,M Reber #5.624 Ep�y CcalraGmde 60 LI— 4 46-ato . ....... . Reber i!5 ,62:i £y�oz Coated Glade Er C 3 44.00 4.0 X 4,0 X 36.0%x. 6 Ga. V-,O,;h R bat #5 .62E F Ceara, G.Mce fA E aw , 40x 4,C. x 72.Sx 6 Ga. kle,0 • F i 240.00 4.0 x 4.0 x 77.5 x 6 Ga. Mesh G 2 200.80 4.0 x 4.0 r n.5 x 6 Ga. M ,h H T a£ .fn'! 4.0 x 4-1 x XG x 8 Ga. kl"h _j 4 .... Li,'li'lCjL 1 2 56 ci 4.0 x 4.0 x 71.5 x 6, G3. 'A, e�01. 14.00 R bml#3.,.375 Elmy 0clu" Grade 630 41,0C 1.0 F>11 s1h 40 M 718" Fenufe Loop lnsvt Reber P„3.37 2 — Onn i5 Mmnfl K 3L- . canon 4Arn.nis tad ffngef .... . ... 4 F22; Er:J C�_. ODE -0, 68137• OF "Tll,Z!N- -ICT CA 96M2 F-w 5;50 5 _L 3.50 ...... . ....... 0 7/8- FERRULE LOOP INSERT — G v \� PART B #5 BAR (M. OF 2) K (TYP. OF 4) END VIEW SCALE 1 ° =5' -- PART le 4.00 C 5 BAR i,eg L.00 MIN Firm* A� art I Main v PAW x --e-K— I -,,rl= Room soma shins nummommum 15 BAR a WHEELS SECTION Q-Q SCAM 1'=2'-8' .sr"aff fdF'tTrrc Lac PART I L 97.80 DETAIL A SOME 1*=2, I WHICH Is no PROPERTY OF SHOMM"'M INC. lVAnAWX TO ANY MRSON(S) WMOUT 4-4--� 4' x 40' MGM REMORCE&C 28 OF 44 1 TG #: C-28 r-4 7 8- 0 0 —4 3/8* CONN. END VIEW SCALE 1 *=5' 44'--it L/2- CONTINUOUS .50e DIA. TOTALLY ENCASED CABLE (POST TENSIONED) (TYP . OF 2) (Typ.)— -LIFTING ro 3/4r" L/1 j / -1 2, 7.— RLAN-KLEW LUG CUT OUT SCALE i"=5* r-Z' D9CX -- END WKIL INTERIOR RAIDS aE-TTIOX A-A SCALE 1*=6l /-LIFTING LUG CUT OUT 0 t/Z- 5 I 1Q' .. O 1 T- 4 5/9* 2° INTERIOR WALLS -•- ^ Z' END BALL .8. 7/0' FERRULE LOOP INSERT (T". OF 2) END VIEW SCALE 1'=6' 4* x 4' x 6 GA. GALV. WW JIEsu MATS TOP SHALL HAVE A ptjlSCi C. 41' (2) fo BAR m SIDE Im P, - EPDXY COATED POLYURETHANE AA 15" ALUM. S-CIZAT ON FINGER BROOM FTNISH EMODED VINYL SIDE BUMPER ATTACK ._r_ PVC SIEVE FOR 5/8- DI& TBRU ROD .95 STATE OF W/S.S. NAaB 0 0' O/C TOP & BOTTOM a. ONC. .... .... i!460 SCALE 1*=2* DECK 5/8* DIA. GALV. WED ROD FREEBOARD PVC 1D 50' DIA. CABLE ENCASED CABLE 2. mr, WALL (2) 15 BAR RA. SMMDE EPDXY e-10A i WHICH 15 THE PROPERTY OF SHORR!(AMTR INC, AVAILABLE TO ANY PERSON(5) TIMOOT x 4 aXN IMF C-29 • ptjlSCi C. 41' (2) fo BAR m SIDE Im P, - EPDXY COATED POLYURETHANE AA COATED BOTTOM AVERAGE THICI MSS .126* EXPANDED POLYSTYRENE NU. 68ST4 ". An Ls,/CU, FT. (Mix.) THIS 'pumG CONTAD AND SHALI. NOT BE CO .95 STATE OF I PlaOR vnrrw CONES; ffQ"JQWlMX AW 1AMMV& "r.E, I RA TCC w Inc. 0 ZORIS k i SECTIQ D-B F, .... .... i!460 SCALE 1*=2* PIZ b . Ar-"r i WHICH 15 THE PROPERTY OF SHORR!(AMTR INC, AVAILABLE TO ANY PERSON(5) TIMOOT x 4 aXN IMF C-29 • 0-- L(q) END CAGE H n C C SEE LIFTING LUG DETAIL A (TYP. OF 4/DOCK) 4' x 4' x 0 GA. MUH Emyy Coai�.* Gm& 60 Rota E:5 .Fi25 F.prxy CoatW Grade 60 4.0x4.0x 3&0x.EGa,Mesh Rebar #1 .625 Epoxy Coated G,wd--- CO 4.Q x 4,0 x 72.5 x 6 Ga. Mash 4,0 x 4,0 x 72,5 x 6 Ga. Mesh .......... S&O . 6 Ga. kie-h Lifting Lug 1,5' X371 Gafr 4.0 Y. 4,0 x 71:5 x 6 Ga, Mest. Rk,a,r #3 .575 Ep-,xy 0oated GrMe 60 Conduit Pipe 1.0 P,c Scb 40 7 !8" Fafrnate p Im.1 RrbarV,i .375 EMxy C: avxll Cede 0 Cannon Wmi 3 X 3 Plate rir, r Ca,,,t,c;.q hlowis End Rrgcr 4 Foot End Cava . . ....... . ... . 4" x 4' x 0 GA. MESH PART G P OVERIIiP G-/ PART A #6 BAR [--il4r,00—�� PLAN .VIEW (TYP. OF 4) SCALE 1,=5, 7/8' FERRULE LOOP INSERT (TYP. OF 2) 30. Moo TY '10 C-\, F3'50 0 1—T i 0 10.00 4600 ti ME V, Gj PART B #5 BAR END VIEW PROFILE -(TYP. OF 4) SCALE 1'-5' SCALE 1'=5' p flo, 68874 z .01", SlAfs : —t I TEIIIAIECII.I.C, It 41� ..w ;8 -c1 , CA W802 qz F-MOSW9 THIS DDAYINU CONTAIN AND ZrAU NOT BE CO PRIOR MiTEN COMM V AW= AWt A=ZVX LrFTING LUG PART 1 3700 9.004--� DETAIL A SCALE V-3, i WHIM IS M PROPERTY OF SH0RPW-';rrER INC. ALVAIIAMS TO ANY FMISON(S) WITHOTIT .................I._,....._..._ 1 45' MIGER REINFORCEN DRAWN BY+ D&M RBP NO: I-noolp 4.4 1P le 08 DWG R D DATE #' C-30 611AI&'AT NNNNNNNNNI if L S K 1.00 M24 (D) 15 BAR SO- W. 0 Noun ART B. �41 Ni go v #5 BAR 4.50 1.60 a WHEELS SECTION G—G SCAIR 1*=2*-e, p flo, 68874 z .01", SlAfs : —t I TEIIIAIECII.I.C, It 41� ..w ;8 -c1 , CA W802 qz F-MOSW9 THIS DDAYINU CONTAIN AND ZrAU NOT BE CO PRIOR MiTEN COMM V AW= AWt A=ZVX LrFTING LUG PART 1 3700 9.004--� DETAIL A SCALE V-3, i WHIM IS M PROPERTY OF SH0RPW-';rrER INC. ALVAIIAMS TO ANY FMISON(S) WITHOTIT .................I._,....._..._ 1 45' MIGER REINFORCEN DRAWN BY+ D&M RBP NO: I-noolp 4.4 1P le 08 DWG R D DATE #' C-30 611AI&'AT �tONTMOUS 400" DIA. TOTALLY ENCASED CABLE (POST TENSIONED) (TYP. OF 2) ,4 7/9" _6.1j2° ,.j 5.— CONN. END VIEW SCALE V 5' PLAN VIEW SCALP 1*=fy' IA �:_L UMNG WG CUT OUT :E 4 3 (ALL 7/8- FERRULE LOOP INSERT (TYP. OF 2) END VIEW SCAM i'=5* 4' x 4' x 6 GA. GALV. WINE MESH MATS -\ EXTRUDED V1 W/S.S. NAUS 3' TOP SHAM HAVE A rNON-SLIF BROOM PH41M . — -- —1 —11— M SIDE BUWER. ATTACH 1p 6' O/C TOP & BOTTObt --- 4. '-- '- -3'-5" DECK 4x5 WALKR (3) p BAR EA. SME EPDXY COATED ----A� SECTION A.-A SCALE 1'=5• /-PVC SLEEVE FOR 5/8' Dik THRU ROD Z,-5/0' DIA. GALV. THRU ROD PVC SLEEVE FOR -50' DI& CABLE -,50' DLL TOTALLY ENCASED CABLE a, SIDE IrAm DAR EA. SIDE EPDXY COATED POLYLIWMNE COATED BOTTOM, EVANDED POLYSTYRENE AVERAGE THICKNESS 125* NO 8-8874 .95 Ia./CU. FT. (Iflff.) STATE OF SECTION C-Q. oqz Ar SCALE 1,=2, I"ffd T.4 1-2.495 10 $610ssoll 0 d— MAWS WORMATION XWCU IS TM PROPERTY OF MOMK&�M INC. W OR MADE LVAnABLE TO ANY PERSON(S) WTHOUT rxR INC. 4' x 5W PINCER DETA C-31 • � ff \-F END CAGE 0 I 'q 4"z4' XOGk MESH PART G Pn f_ G \ '-- m t OYERIAP G C C PART A #5 BAR 150,00 --.- PLAT .VIEW (TYP, OF a) PART V & SCALE 1"=61 7/8' FMUlE. LOOP INSERT - (TYP. OF 2) 599,50 32 60 5.80 3.50 47(.00 . ........... G J %- PART B 45 BAR ENDLYM SHE LIMNG LUG MAIL A J t" X 4* X 6 GA, vi\sa (TYP. OF 6) scul t• .51 (M. OF -I/DOCK), PROFILE SCALE 1*.b* Pat 'e 400 -.C25 E—Y (;�atld Gmd� 84 13 i .:.' SM. U. '� $s.'s -,3,00 jrAl HT Reim 95.025 Eooxy Coaled Grade 60 PART N: 4.0 x 4,0 . 72-5 x 6 Ca. MeSh 5.80 3.50 47(.00 . ........... G J %- PART B 45 BAR ENDLYM SHE LIMNG LUG MAIL A J t" X 4* X 6 GA, vi\sa (TYP. OF 6) scul t• .51 (M. OF -I/DOCK), PROFILE SCALE 1*.b* 7t6' Fp�.le Reba, 43.375 Evjx ,ol, 110.1.911, Erd Foot Err.! c"'Y' • ............ tio. 68874 STATE Al Pat 'e 400 -.C25 E—Y (;�atld Gmd� 84 13 C, SM. U. R.--bal 96,625 Epoxy Co-Med Grade 6G PART K -,3,00 . .......... - x 6 GaMesh 4A Mesh HT Reim 95.025 Eooxy Coaled Grade 60 PART N: 4.0 x 4,0 . 72-5 x 6 Ca. MeSh G O BENT IN L SHE 4.0 x 4.0 x 72,5 Y, 6 Ca Me�h 2 24010D 4A x 4x0 x ?2.5 X 0 C-3, Mesh 6 Ca. M�sh t 4 ' "" Ultinq Lug I-S' X 17- G-sle Im w 4.0 x 4,0 X P.S X 6 GaL W' h 7t6' Fp�.le Reba, 43.375 Evjx ,ol, 110.1.911, Erd Foot Err.! c"'Y' • ............ tio. 68874 STATE Al TIM isD TETRA TErN, NC- I amM lowe F. sam, ".Vrzls LIFTING LUG PART 1 37.00 -- I 9M d---I DETAIL A SCALE 1'=3' I WWCH IS M PROPE• OF SHOREM&SM WC. AVARABLE TO A-NY PERSON(S) MR0137 PAP ZKT OF 44 #, C-38 Pat 'e 400 #5 BAR 1.00 NON ... ...... . . . . . PART K JS W 14" TA. PART N: G O BENT IN L SHE 100 WN (D) #j BAR 36- M EXPANDED POLYSTYRZNK-'� PART "H" #5 BAR, 4,60 1.50 J THKELS SE(ITIQP� /-3 —Q SCALE 1'=2'-6' TIM isD TETRA TErN, NC- I amM lowe F. sam, ".Vrzls LIFTING LUG PART 1 37.00 -- I 9M d---I DETAIL A SCALE 1'=3' I WWCH IS M PROPE• OF SHOREM&SM WC. AVARABLE TO A-NY PERSON(S) MR0137 PAP ZKT OF 44 #, C-38 CONTINUOUS .025" DIA. TOTAIXY ENCASED CABLE, (POST TENSIONED TO 18 TONS) (TYP. OF 2) 7 10 6•j j t-2° END WALLS CONN. END VIEW SCALE I*=5' 2. WARNallpm SCALE 1.*-G' LIFTING LUG CUT OUT . ...... . ...... . .................... —1 —oi.00 INTERIOR WALLS SECTION A-A SCALE ("=fV TOP SHALL HAVE BROOM 15" CLEAT NON-Slip SURFACE CONO. 6/8, GALV. THRU ROD- MMUDED VRM SIDE BUMPER DECK ATTACHED wpqs. NAILS 0 a- O/C .... . ........... FREEBOARD -41t WALER PVC CONDUIT FOR 825 DIA. (a) 05 BAR EA. SWEA TOTALLY ENCASED CABLE EPDXY COATED 9WANDED, POLYSTYRENE SMS TAU .05 LB./Cu. FT. (MIN•) (3) #5 BAR EA. SIDE EPDXY COATED POLYURETHANE COATRD BOTTOM 10 THICKNESS t2e oc tj O 68074 SECTION B-B STATE V SCALE 1'=2'-6' A 4OR101- DECK 7/8- FERRUZ LOOP INSERT (TYP. OF 3) LIFTING LUG CUT OUT 2'-2 1/2'-,, 3/4 13.00 FT-7- 2. 1 7 5/16"- -.-Z" END VAJUL Z' INTERIOR WALLS B. JUL 2 END VIEW SCALE I-s' 0 7 7/8" 5 1/2- r -7 10 END VIEW SCALE I-s' 0 4, x 4" x 0 ok mFsfl PART G T G P r OVERLAP TT F 1 C 1 7 G-7 C 16000 END CAGE PART �A5 BAR PLAN VIEW PART m (TYP. OF t) SCALA 1'=5' 7/8- FERRLLE LOOP INSERT 53.00 (TYP OF 3) X/1 0 j V, SEE LUMO UTO DETAIL A -1 ✓�4' x MPSH (TYP. OF 4/DOCK) PROFILE SCALE I*=6, FINISHED PART DESCRIPION Reha, Erxwy coated Gmde CO Epoxy cz'ted G2 ub 4.0 x 4,0 x 42.0 x 6 Ga. Mesh Reber 05 X26 Epoxy Coatwf Grade 13M 4.0 x 4O x 73.0 x 6 Ga. kiesri 4,0 * 4,0 % 73,() x 8 G2, h4eah 4,0 x 4,0 x_73,0 x_5 GA. Mash 4,L, . 4,T) M.i� A.0), t.G . 73,0 x 0 Ga. Mezih Reber #3.375 Epoxy Coated Grade 6C C.ndliit Pipe I C Pc S,h 4a 7/8- Fe'nfo Loop inson t-5,373 , Cirman-Moum 3 X3 Plate M1+y vr Cannon Mounfa End Fl-,.Qw 5 Foot Ent! Cne Do 69674 A STATE OF I Q' \,;— 41.0 RO 00 M6 T 12.00 F '50 48M .88 tL 1: - t�— `-, G G -/ K-1 END VIEW PART B #6 BAR SCALEL,=5, (TYP. OF 4) (C) 4" ar 4* x 0 GA. MESH (A) #5 BAR F6,00 --4.00 F O mw LIFTING LUG (K) #3 BAR 14" LG. PART 1 39.00 - - - - - - - B11a U SHAPE EXPANDED POLYSTYRENB — (N) f. BAR 30- LG. 9.00 NT L SHAPE (B) #5 BAR COO 3=00 J D) #5 BAR 41f1 LG, 1.60 DETAIL A SECTION G-G SCALE 1'=3' SCALE 1"=3* AMMAW On AW. A==W N14 IMimir i yav".A" I61,45Z4Z m Amr1olv VA X/1 0 j V, SEE LUMO UTO DETAIL A -1 ✓�4' x MPSH (TYP. OF 4/DOCK) PROFILE SCALE I*=6, FINISHED PART DESCRIPION Reha, Erxwy coated Gmde CO Epoxy cz'ted G2 ub 4.0 x 4,0 x 42.0 x 6 Ga. Mesh Reber 05 X26 Epoxy Coatwf Grade 13M 4.0 x 4O x 73.0 x 6 Ga. kiesri 4,0 * 4,0 % 73,() x 8 G2, h4eah 4,0 x 4,0 x_73,0 x_5 GA. Mash 4,L, . 4,T) M.i� A.0), t.G . 73,0 x 0 Ga. Mezih Reber #3.375 Epoxy Coated Grade 6C C.ndliit Pipe I C Pc S,h 4a 7/8- Fe'nfo Loop inson t-5,373 , Cirman-Moum 3 X3 Plate M1+y vr Cannon Mounfa End Fl-,.Qw 5 Foot Ent! Cne Do 69674 A STATE OF I Q' \,;— 41.0 RO 00 M6 T 12.00 F '50 48M .88 tL 1: - t�— `-, G G -/ K-1 END VIEW PART B #6 BAR SCALEL,=5, (TYP. OF 4) (C) 4" ar 4* x 0 GA. MESH (A) #5 BAR F6,00 --4.00 F O mw LIFTING LUG (K) #3 BAR 14" LG. PART 1 39.00 - - - - - - - B11a U SHAPE EXPANDED POLYSTYRENB — (N) f. BAR 30- LG. 9.00 NT L SHAPE (B) #5 BAR COO 3=00 J D) #5 BAR 41f1 LG, 1.60 DETAIL A SECTION G-G SCALE 1'=3' SCALE 1"=3* Zopmy OF SUORMASTER Ric. Pmox(s) wuuous 6' x 50` FLNGER VENI FORM C-34 AMMAW On AW. A==W TETRA TFCKINC. i yav".A" I61,45Z4Z m Amr1olv VA Zopmy OF SUORMASTER Ric. Pmox(s) wuuous 6' x 50` FLNGER VENI FORM C-34 _/CONTINUOUS 026' DIA. TOTALLY ENCASED CAnl! � .—I I — 11 (POST TENSION19D TO 10 TONS) (TYP, OF 2) SCALE 1,=S, 12MNG LUG = OUT 4 . . .... ... 64-11 1/2-- 7 7/©° I— -5 - W-i 1/4' ... 9• -in " 7 5/16* V-2 5/8... -i Z. ----- ------ a. 2-- END WALLS 2..JMRIOR 11m1s, CONN. END VIEW SCADS SECTION-A-A SCALE I'=6* Ib* CLEAT TOP SHALT. -HAVE BROOM NON-IRR SURFACE SEE DETAIL A CONC. 5/8- GALY. THRU ROD EXTRUDED VINYL SIDE DUMPER ATTACHRD W/S,S. NAILS 0 8- O/C FREEBOARD .... . ..... I 4T6 WALER 3*-I0* (3) J5 BAR EA. SIDE PVC CONDUIT FOR .698 DIA. EPDXY COATED TOTALLY ENCASED CABLE EXPANDED POLYSTYRENE —0* $IDE WALL .65 LB. /CU. FT. (IAN.) (3) #5 BAR EA. SIDE EPDXY COATED POLYURETHANE COATED BOTTOM AVERAGE THICKNESS .125* DECK 4�0 No. 68974 . ..... TETRA rECA, INC SECTION B-B d STATE OF SCALE 11=21-6* 9ml, To 56149s.ails S&1495m7t 6/8- ULJL. T"U UUI;X W&LV- EXTRUDED vwn SIDE BUMPER 7/0' FEPHLIE LOOP INSERT (TM OF 3) LUTING LUG CUT OUT 2'-2 1/1 6 3/4'- -- 7 7/8' lo* INTERIOR HALLS Ail ", pl loxs j �Mrslv 31-5. EN-1 1 V -lE W . I..&. T WHICH W THE FRGPZR•r Of AVAILADIA TO Al" FMON(S) V x 55, C-35 --;q IN --,o 7/6- -3 1/2- r-7 6/16- IN,c. Wells, Wayne From: Tefft, Robert Sent: Thursday, May 21, 2009 1:41 PM To: Dougall- Sides, Leslie; Delk, Michael Cc: Wells, Wayne; Mahony, Laura Subject: RE: GM09- 1371 -007: Boat Slips Hearing The CG allows "Type B" and "C" Marina Facilities as a special exception. 0 A "Type B" Marina Facility would be a launching ramp site with limited commercial activity. A "Type C" Marina Facility would be a private marina that could consist of boat slips, launching facilities, parking, etc. The "Type A" Marina Facility, which was not permitted in the CG District, allowed for pleasure craft docking with floating docks and boat slips. I'm not sure if this would technically be the more consistent type to what the City has proposed. From: Dougall- Sides, Leslie Sent: Thursday, May 21, 2009 1:28 PM To: Tefft, Robert; Delk, Michael Cc: Wells, Wayne; Mahony, Laura Subject: RE: GM09- 1371 -007: Boat Slips Hearing Would CG allow a Marina as of right, or through a conditional use or variance process? From: Tefft, Robert Sent: Thursday, May 21, 2009 1:13 PM To: Dougall- Sides, Leslie; Delk, Michael Cc: Wells, Wayne; Mahony, Laura Subject: RE: GM09 -1371 -007: Boat Slips Hearing According to our 1972 zoning maps, the zoning of the Pierce 100 property was CG (General Business). The zoning was still CG as of February 1, 1979. From: Dougall- Sides, Leslie Sent: Thursday, May 21, 2009 10:57 AM To: Delk, Michael; Tefft, Robert Cc: Wells, Wayne; Mahony, Laura Subject: GM09- 1371 -007: Boat Slips Hearing A question which Rod and staff have asked at the last couple of staff meetings is: What was the zoning on the Pierce 100 property in 1974 when the condos were built? Wayne said he was going to see whether Planning had old LDCs which would provide the answer. Otherwise, it will require research th0gh ORLS. Leslie K. Dougall -Sides Assistant City Attorney City of Clearwater P.O. Box 4748 Clearwater, Florida 33758 (727) 562 -4010 phone (727) 562 -4021 fax Board Certified in City, County and Local Government Law Admitted in Florida, Oregon, and the District of Columbia Senior Professional in Human Resources • Page 1 C, Wells, Wayne. From: Irwin, Rod Sent: Friday, May 01, 2009 10:25 AM To: Mahony, Laura; Chesney, Ed; Morris, William. D. Cc: Quillen, Michael;. Dougall- Sides,. Leslie; Delk, Michael; Wells, Wayne; Akin, Pam Subject: RE: Marina BOCC hearing agree with Laura.. - - - -- Original. Message----- From. Mahony,. Laura Sent:. Friday, May 01, 2009 10:23 AM To: Chesney, Ed; Morris, William D.; Irwin,. Rod Cc: Quillen, Michael;. Dougall- Sides, Leslie;. Delk, Michael; Wells, Wayne; Akin,. Pam Subject:. RE: Marina BOCC hearing I agree - not sure that a power point is the best use of time (we only get 20 minutes). My feeling is that based on all of the information that has been supplied, we would want to. provide more of a "summary" of the project addressing the positive aspects of the project and defeating any arguments on points that we deem vulnerable. to challenge - i.e., design decisions (particularly those accommodating neighboring property), environmental (positive input of other permitting agencies /status of other permits), public relations -type questions (general benefit to the downtown and surrounding area /economy - like. Rod did at CDB), etc. In addition, the entire staff should certainly be ready to answer any design, environmental, use, or logistical questions. We are going to need to meet flesh it out - at that time we could create an outline of topics we like to touch on and pin down presenters. - - - -- Original Message--- - From: Chesney, Ed Sent: Friday, May 01, 2009 10:05 AM. To:. Mahony, Laura; Morris,. William D.; Irwin, Rod Cc: Quillen,. Michael Subject: RE: Marina BOCC hearing. I am meeting with Dave G today only because he will be here on other business, and asked if we could get together. My first question to the group is, are we going to give a PP presentation or just an oral presentation? Dave sent an earlier PP, that was given to our council. I think a PP may be too much,. any thoughts ? ?? - - - -- Original Message--- - From: Mahony, Laura Sent: Friday, May 01, 2009 9:50 AM To: Morris, William D.; Irwin, Rod; Chesney, Ed Cc: Quillen, Michael Subject: RE: Marina BOCC hearing All:. The relevant language from the Charter is as follows: City may permit ferries, water taxis, excursion boats and similar uses to access the 5/l/2009 ` Page 2 of 3 docks for drop off and pick up of passengers only.... City council shall adopt by resolution regulations that provide city residents first priority for the dedicated boat slips and which insure public access to the docks, boardwalks and promenade. No boat launching ramps, fueling facilities, ticket booths or parking garage shall be permitted. I think Dave's description addresses most of the Charter language but suggest perhaps "charter vessels" be replaced with "excursion boats ". (I think "charter vessels" implies fishing, boats to some people and could create an image of the environment similar to the beach marina where a lot of fishing activities take place). In addition, we might want him to add the entire last sentence (above) in place of his first sentence. - - - -- Original Message - - - - -. From: Morris,. William D. Sent: Friday, May 01, 2009 9:39 AM To: Irwin, Rod; Chesney, Ed Cc: Quillen, Michael; Mahony, Laura. Subject: RE: Marina. BOCC hearing Rod, I agree, the intent was that the free to the public "side tie" are first come, first serve to anyone who ties up without regard to residency. As these are not overnight slips they are an amenity to the boating. public to access Downtown and Coachman Park ( or even just the restrooms) during the day. We have plenty of transient side tie for overnight mooring. I think it fits our "improving public boater access" argument we used in getting the grant to keep it open to everyone. (provided their vessel size and draft is compatible with the space and water depth available) Ed Chesney is meeting with Dave Guildersleeve at 11 this AM in Engineering, Dave Guildersleeve called me and asked If I could be there and help with "rounding out" the presentation he is putting together. I will address this and help. with the presentation and work with Ed on answering Dave Walkers questions. v/r Bill M - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Irwin, Rod Sent: Friday, May 01,. 2009 9:04 AM To: Chesney, Ed; Morris,. William D. Cc: Quillen,. Michael; Mahony, Laura Subject: RE: Marina BOCC hearing Importance: High I think we should include language about the significant free, community " tie - up "space that will be available to residents -- County as well as City? Thoughts? - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Chesney, Ed Sent: Friday, May 01, 2009 8:34 AM To: Morris, William D.. Cc: Quillen, Michael; Mahony, Laura; Irwin, Rod Subject: FW: Marina BOCC hearing Bill and others, see comments below from Dave Walker. Do you want to provide him with more details of the project? - - - -- Original Message - - - -- 5/1/2009 ~` Page 3 of 3 From: Walker, David [ mailto :dlwalker @co.pinellas.fl.us] Sent: Thursday, April 30, 2009.4:21 PM To: Chesney, Ed Cc: Petren, Conor J Subject:. Marina. Ed, Can you take a look at the following language and make sure I've correctly summarized the City's commitments. It's not intended to be an all inclusive list. I just want to. address up front (in summary) the types of questions that have come up in the past on marina and multi -slip projects... I think I've got them accurate from various statements in the application package, I just want to make sure I don't promise anything to. the Board that you didn't intend.. Thanks, Dave No. fueling facilities are proposed for this project.. No live- aboards will be allowed although there are provisions for limited overnight stays (8 nights maximum per month for tenants and 3 days for transient visitors). The slips will be leased to. recreational boaters although there may be a pick -up /drop -off point in the northern half of the marina for ferries, water taxis, and other charter vessels. The City already uses the ferry dock at the north end of the marina for community events (such as fishing tournaments) and this use will remain. Commercial tenants will remain at the City's main marina on the beach.. 5/1/2009 - ,,K Wells, Wayne 0 0 From: Mahony, Laura Sent: Thursday, April 30, 2009 9:30 AM To: Chesney, Ed; Morris, William D.; Quillen, Michael Cc: Dougall- Sides, Leslie; Wells, Wayne; Delk, Michael Subject: RE: revised boat slip figure OK. Also, the sections of the Pinellas County Code that Dave Walker was referring to at the admin hearing are 166.333(3) and (4)- (which are incorporated as a requirement of commercial docks in section 166.334(a)(1)). The sections address structures /tie poles projecting into the navigable portion of the waterway more than 25% and docks extending waterward of the seawall, mean or ordinary high water line more than 300 feet, respectively. What I gathered from the meeting is that Dave is comfortable with those criteria not being a problem and I think he is likely to address them in his staff recommendation to quell any questions county commissioners may have. If he does not address them in the staff recommendation, we probably need to be ready to address them should they come up at the BOCC hearing. - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Chesney, Ed Sent: Thursday, April 30, 2009 8:22 AM To: Morris, William D.; Mahony, Laura; Quillen, Michael Subject: FW: revised boat slip figure FYI, from Pinellas County - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Walker, David [ mailto :dlwalker@co.pinellas.fl.us] Sent: Wednesday, April 29, 2009 4:45 PM To: Chesney, Ed Subject: RE: revised boat slip figure Thanks. This is good. It printed out fine over here so you don't need to send a paper copy. If it's not a big deal can you do one that is zoomed out far enough to pick up the other marker (even if the lettering gets too small). Also, I don't think we'll need to do a "summary" sheet like we were talking about. I'm going to sum up those types of things (like fueling, pump -outs, etc.) and put them in our memo. I'll probably send you a paragraph in the next day or so to look at just to make sure I don't mischaracterize something. Thanks for helping, Dave - - - -- Original Message---- - From :.Ed.Chesney@myClearwater.com [ mailto :Ed.Chesney@myClearwater.com] Sent: Wednesday, April 29, 2009 3:22 PM To: Walker, David L Subject: revised boat slip figure <<MARINA2_ICW- llxl7.pdf >> 1 Dave, see attached and let Wow if you have any questionsW Ed Chesney, P.E. Environmental Manager City of Clearwater 100 South Myrtle Ave., #220 Clearwater, FL. 33756 -5520 Phone: 727 - 562 -4742 Fax: 727 - 562 -4755 Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Monday, April 27, 2009.2:54 PM To: Delk, Michael Cc: Clayton, Gina; Tefft, Robert; Chesney, Ed Subject: Downtown. Marina Michael - I attended the administrative hearing of the Water and Navigation Board along with other City Staff... There were no persons attending the hearing in opposition.. The public hearing for this application before the Board of County Commissioners (BoCC) will be on June. 2,. 2009. I cannot attend this public hearing, as I will be in Colorado at that time.. Someone from our department should attend the BoCC. public hearing, in case there are zoning questions.. Thought I should let you know. Wayne M. Wells, A/CP Planner III City of Clearwater 100 South. Myrtle. Avenue Clearwater, FL 33756 -5520 Phone: 727- 562 -4504 Fax: 727 - 562 -4865 iK ,„Re: GM08- 1313 -020: Boatslips County Hearing Process Page 1 of 2 Wells, Wayne From: Castelli, Joelle Wiley Sent: Wednesday, March 25, 2009 7:17 PM To: Simmons, Margie; Dougall- Sides, Leslie; Mahony, Laura; Chesney, Ed; Akin, Pam; Wells, Wayne; Morris, William D.; Quillen, Michael; Irwin, Rod Subject: RE: GM08- 1313 -020: Boatslips County Hearing Process Am I needed or can I take the "Margie Simmons opt out" also? From: Simmons,. Margie Sent: Wed 3/25/2009 12:13 PM To: Dougall- Sides, Leslie;. Mahony,. Laura; Chesney, Ed;. Akin, Pam; Castelli, Joelle Wiley; Wells,. Wayne; Morris, William. D.; Quillen, Michael; Irwin, Rod Subject: Re: GM08- 1313 -020.: Boatslips County Hearing Process. I don't think I am needed to testify, therefore my resume will not be needed. Correct me if I am not correct. Margie Simmons Finance Director City of Clearwater Sent from my. B1ackBerry Wireless Handheld - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Dougall- Sides, Leslie. To: Mahony, Laura; Chesney, Ed; Akin, Pam; Simmons, Margie; Castelli, Joelle Wiley; Wells, Wayne; Morris, William D.; Quillen, Michael; Irwin, Rod Sent: Wed Mar 25 11:58:36 2009 Subject: RE: GM08- 1313 -020.: Boatslips. County Hearing Process Laura, did they indicate when the resumes should be submitted? We have time to include them in "The. Book" if they may be. submitted prior to the hearing. - - - -- Original Message - - - -- . From: Mahony, Laura Sent: Wednesday, March 25, 2009 11:25 AM To: Chesney, Ed; Akin, Pam; Simmons, Margie; Castelli, Joelle Wiley; Wells, Wayne; Dougall- Sides, Leslie; Morris, William D.; Quillen, Michael; Irwin, Rod Subject: GM08 -1313 - 020 :. Boatslips County Hearing Process I have touched base with the County Attorney's office to confirm the following in response to questions that came up in yesterday's meeting. The Administrative Hearing is very informal and it is more for information gathering for County Staff and for staff to 5/1/2009 Re: GM08- 1313 -020: Boatslips County Hearing Process Page 2 of 2 0 0 have an opportunity to hear and address concerns of interested parties prior to the formal public BOCC hearing. The process permits rime, if applicable, to modify the project/application before moving to a formal hearing and vote. * The supplemental materials ( "The Book ") will be submitted as support material to our application and will automatically become a part of the record for purposes of the BOCC Hearing and any resulting appeal, however, the attorney's office suggests reiterating our desire for the materials to be submitted as part of the record during the BOCC hearing process. * Technically, only one copy of The Book needs to be submitted (not one for each commissioner). The Commissioners will not likely pour through such extensive materials and staff will highlight what they deem to be relevant for Commission review of the application. * All City representatives that may be called to. address questions or present at the BOCC hearing should submit a resume . and be introduced as experts. Attached is a sample BOCC agenda item. It is for a dredge and fill permit in St. Pete -. but at least provides the format and details we should expect might be included as our item moves forward. Most importantly, see pages 12 -.14 which is the Water and Navigation Staff Report and Recommendation. <<Sample agenda WN iteml.pdfl> Hope this is helpful. Laura Lipowski Mahony Assistant City Attorney. City of Clearwater P.O. Box 4748 Clearwater, Florida 33758 (727) 562 -4010 phone (727) 562 -4021 fax Board Certified in Real Estate Law 5/1/2009 f*- I Wells, Wayne From: Simmons, Margie Sent: Wednesday, March 25, 2009 12:14 PM To: Dougall- Sides, Leslie; Mahony, Laura; Chesney, Ed; Akin, Pam; Castelli, Joelle Wiley; Wells, Wayne; Morris, William D.; Quillen, Michael; Irwin, Rod Subject: Re: GM08- 1313 -020: Boatslips County Hearing Process I don't think I am needed to testify, therefore my resume will not be needed. Correct me if I am not correct. Margie Simmons Finance Director City of Clearwater -------------------- - - - - -- Sent from my B1ackBerry Wireless. Handheld - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Dougall- Sides, Leslie To: Mahony, Laura; Chesney, Ed; Akin, Pam; Simmons, Margie; Castelli, Joelle. Wiley; Wells, Wayne; Morris, William D.; Quillen, Michael;. Irwin,. Rod Sent: Wed Mar-25.11:58:36.2009 Subject: RE: GM08- 1313 -020 : Boatslips. County Hearing. Process Laura, did they indicate when the resumes should be submitted? We have time to include them in "The Book" if.they may be submitted prior to the hearing. - - - -- Original Message ----- From:.Mahony, Laura Sent: Wednesday, March 25, 2009 11:25 AM To: Chesney, Ed;. Akin, Pam; Simmons, Margie; Castelli, Joelle Wiley; Wells, Wayne;. Dougall- Sides,. Leslie;.Morris, William D.; Quillen, Michael; Irwin, Rod Subject: GM08- 1313 -020 Boatslips County Hearing Process I have touched base with the County Attorney's office. to. confirm the following in response to questions that came up in yesterday's. meeting. * The Administrative Hearing is.very informal and it. is more for information gathering for County Staff and for staff. to have an opportunity to. hear and address. concerns of interested parties prior to the formal public. BOCC hearing... The process permits. time, if applicable, to modify the project /application before moving to a formal hearing and vote.. * The supplemental materials ( "The Book ") will be submitted as. support material to our application and will automatically become a part of the record for.purposes of the BOCC Hearing and any resulting appeal, however, the attorney's office suggests. reiterating our desire for the materials to be submitted as part of the record during the BOCC hearing process. * Technically, only one copy of. The. Book needs to be submitted (not one for each commissioner). The Commissioners will not likely pour through such extensive materials and staff will highlight what they deem to be relevant for Commission review of the application. * All City representatives that may be called to. address questions or present at the BOCC hearing should submit a resume and be introduced as experts. Attached is a sample BOCC agenda item. It is for a dredge and fill permit in St. Pete - but at least provides the format and details we should expect might be included as our item moves. forward. Most importantly, see pages 12 - 14 which is the Water and Navigation Staff Report and Recommendation. 1 <<Sample agenda WN iteml.pdf >> Hope this is helpful. Laura Lipowski Mahony Assistant City Attorney City of Clearwater P.O..Box 4748 Clearwater, Florida 33758 (727) 562 -4010 phone (727) 562 -4021 fax Board Certified in Real Estate. Law �M08 -1313 -020 : Boatslips County Hearing Process Page 1 of 2 Wells, Wayne From: Dougall- Sides, Leslie Sent: Wednesday, March 25, 2009 11:59 AM To: Mahony, Laura; Chesney, Ed; Akin, Pam; Simmons, Margie; Castelli, Joelle. Wiley; Wells, Wayne; Morris, William D.; Quillen, Michael; Irwin, Rod Subject: RE: GM08- 1313 -020.: Boatslips County Hearing Process IblNumAttach: 0 MessageGUID:. {753C3DE3 -DADO -461 D- 87C6- 3F134766C5FD) MsgHeaderlD: < 80F72182073070479C8BFC6AD53E3FEC5A65FO @MSB- EML- l.clearwater- fi.com> OriginalDate: None > Originator: SQL Style: Bayfront Downtown Boatslips- Permitting,Design &Construction (Misener) Laura,. did they indicate when the resumes should be submitted? We have time to include them in "The Book ". if they may be submitted prior to the hearing. - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Mahony, Laura Sent: Wednesday, March 25, 2009 11:25 AM To: Chesney, Ed; Akin, Pam; Simmons, Margie; Castelli, Joelle Wiley; Wells, Wayne; Dougall- Sides, Leslie; Morris, William D.; Quillen, Michael; Irwin, Rod Subject: GM08 -1313 -020 : Boatslips County Hearing Process have touched base with. the County Attorney's office to confirm the following in response to. questions that came up in yesterday's. meeting. • The Administrative. Hearing is. very informal and it is more for information gathering for County Staff and for staff to have an opportunity to hear and address concerns of interested parties prior to the formal public BOCC hearing.. The process permits. time, if applicable, to modify. the project/application before moving to a formal hearing and vote., • The supplemental materials ( "The Book ") will be submitted as support material to our application and will automatically become a part of the record for purposes of the BOCC Hearing and any resulting appeal, however, the attorney's office. suggests reiterating our desire for the materials to. be submitted. as part of the record during the BOCC hearing. process. • Technically,, only one copy of The Book needs to be submitted (not one. for each commissioner). The Commissioners will not likely pour through such extensive materials and staff will highlight what they deem to be relevant for Commission review of the application.. • All City representatives that may be called to address questions or present at the BOCC hearing should submit a resume. and. be. introduced as experts... Attached is a sample BOCC agenda item. It is for a dredge and fill permit in St. Pete - but at least provides the format and details we should expect might be included as our item moves forward. Most importantly, see pages. 12 - 14 which is. the Water and Navigation Staff Report and Recommendation. <<Sample agenda WN item1.pdf>> Hope this is helpful. Laura Lipowski Mahony 5/1/2009 .r GM08- 1313 -020: Boatslips County Hearing Process Page 2 of 2 Assistant City Attorney City of Clearwater P.O. Box 4748 Clearwater, Florida 33758 (727) 562 -4010 phone (727) 562 -4021 fax Board Certified in Real Estate Law 5/1/2009 0 0 Wells, Wayne From: Mahony, Laura Sent: Wednesday, March 25, 2009 11:25 AM To: Chesney, Ed; Akin, Pam; Simmons, Margie; Castelli, Joelle Wiley;. Wells, Wayne; Dougall- Sides,. Leslie; Morris, William D.; Quillen, Michael; Irwin, Rod Subject: GM08- 1313 -020: Boatslips. County Hearing. Process IbINumAttach: 1 MessageGUID: {753C3DE3 -DADO -461 D- 87C6- 3F1 34766C5FD) OriginalDate: None Originator: SQL Style: Bayfront Downtown. Boatslips- Permitting,Design &Construction (Misener) I have touched base with the. County Attorney's office to confirm. the following in response to questions that came up in yesterday's. meeting. • The Administrative Hearing is very. informal and it is more for information gathering for County Staff and for staff to have an opportunity to hear and address concerns of interested parties prior to the. formal. public BOCC. hearing. The process permits time, if applicable,. to modify the project/application before moving to a. formal hearing and vote. • The supplemental materials ( "The Book ") will be submitted as support material to our application and will. automatically become a part of the record for purposes of the BOCC Hearing and any resulting appeal, however, the attorney's . office suggests reiterating our desire for the. materials to be submitted as part of the record during the BOCC hearing process. • Technically,. only one copy of The Book needs to be submitted (not one for each commissioner). The Commissioners. will not likely pour through such extensive materials and staff will highlight what they deem to be. relevant for Commission review of the application. • All City representatives that may be called to address questions or present at the BOCC hearing should submit a resume and. be introduced as experts. Attached is a sample BOCC agenda item... It is for a dredge and fill. permit in St.' Pete - -but at least provides the format and details we should expect might be included as our item moves. forward. Most importantly,. see. pages 12 - 14. which is the Water and Navigation Staff Report and Recommendation. 9d Sample ;nda WN iteml. Hope this is helpful. Laura Lipowski Mahony Assistant City Attorney City of Clearwater P.O. Box 4748 Clearwater, Florida 33758. (727) 562 -4010 phone (727) 562 -4021 fax Board Certified in Real Estate Law • Wells, Wayne r� From: Dougall- Sides, Leslie Sent: Wednesday, March 25, 2009 9:12 AM To: Wells, Wayne; Chesney, Ed Cc: Delk, Michael; Tefft, Robert; Irwin, Rod; Akin, Pam;. Mahony, Laura; Morris, William D.; Clayton, Gina Subject: RE:. Downtown. Marina BoCC Meeting The April 21 BOCC Public Hearing items are set to begin. at 6:30 p.m. per the County website. - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Tuesday, March 24, 2009 7:34 PM To: Chesney, Ed Cc: Delk, Michael; Tefft, Robert; Irwin, Rod; Akin, Pam; Dougall- Sides, Leslie; Mahony, Laura; Morris, William D.; Clayton, Gina Subject: Downtown Marina BoCC Meeting Ed - It was mentioned. at today's strategy meeting that the Board of County Commissioners (BoCC) meeting to review /approve the City's. downtown marina would be April 21, 2009. The Community Development Board (CDB) also meets on that day at 1:00 pm, at which I will need to attend as I will have cases to present. Leslie is also the Assistant City Attorney for the City at the CDB.. Needed to advise you of the meeting conflict, as I do not know what time of the day the BoCC meets and /or when the City's application would be heard by the BoCC. Wayne M. Wells, AICP Planner III City of Clearwater 100 South. Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, FL 33756 -5520 Phone: 727 - 562 -4504 Fax: 727 - 562 -4865 z Wells, Wayne From: Dougall- Sides, Leslie Sent: Tuesday, March 24, 2009 4:57 PM To: Chesney, Ed; Wells, Wayne Cc: Akin, Pam; Irwin, Rod; Quillen, Michael; Morris, William D.; Delk, Michael; Mahony, Laura Subject: GM09- 1371 -007: Pinellas. County Code Sec. 166 -321, Dock Permit Requirements and Restrictions Importance: High IblNumAttach: 1 MessageGUID: {DCDD14A1 -31 FC- 4B42- BA63- ECF49BA973DD) OriginalDate: None Originator: SQL Style: Downtown Boat Slips general miscellaneous Attached is the additional Pinellas County Code. Section discussed at today's meeting. It appears that the City's application constitutes a Class. C (constructed and maintained by municipality) Commercial dock under the Definitions Section, 166 -242, and therefore that Subsections (d),. (e), (f), (h), (i), 0), and (m) of Section 166 -321 should be addressed in the City's. Compliance Narrative. Re (h)(10), I previously provided Ed with a copy of Florida Administrative Code Table 62- 302.530, Class III, Predominantly Marine Waters,. which I believe to be the applicable Surface Water Quality Criteria for the Outstanding Florida Water designated in FAC Rule 62- 302.700(9)(h)32., Pinellas County State Aquatic Preserve. Dial Cordy should be able to verify this. Sec 166 -321. ck Permit Requ Leslie K. Dougall -Sides Assistant City Attorney City of Clearwater P.O. Box 4748 Clearwater, Florida 33758 (727) 562 -4010 phone (727) 562 -4021 fax Board Certified in City, County and Local Government Law Admitted in Florida, Oregon, and the District of Columbia Senior Professional in Human Resources Sec. :66732 ,11. Dock permit requirements and restrictions. (a) No person shall construct any dock within the Waters of the County without having first obtained a permit for such construction from the Authority. (b) Live - aboard facilities shall not be permitted without the appropriate infrastructure and solid waste facilities to support equivalent residential units.. (c) The Authority, based on the location of natural resources, encourages, and may require, the use of a single mooring facility at apartments, condominiums, zero lot line attached units, and cooperative apartments, or where cumulative impacts would invoke section 166- 282(e). (d) All multiuse and commercial dock installations must be consistent with the zoning of the adjacent upland riparian property.. (e) . Boat lifts shall not be permitted where the installation of such lifts can reasonably be expected to have an adverse impact on the natural resources in the immediate vicinity of the installation.. (f) In tidal waters, all docks shall have at least 18 inches of water depth at the slip at mean low tide and shall have a continuous channel with a minimum of 18 inches of water depth at mean low tide to allow access to the structure from open waters.. (g) . In nontidal waters, all docks shall have at least 18 inches of water depth at the slip, as measured from ordinary low water, and shall have a continuous channel with a minimum of 18 inches of water depth at ordinary low water to allow access to the structure from open water.. (h) In accordance with the Comprehensive Plan Coastal Management Element policy 5.1.2, the Authority shall use the following criteria in the review of commercial and multiuse private dock structures: (1) Adequate water depth to accommodate the proposed boat use.. (2). Preference shall be given to the expansion of suitable existing facilities rather than new construction.. (3) Located in areas where there is adequate flushing of the basin to prevent stagnation and water quality deterioration. (4) No adverse impact on archaeological or historic sites as defined by State and local comprehensive plans. (5) . Reasonable access to a large navigable water body.. (6) Sufficient upland area to accommodate all needed utilities and support facilities, such as parking spaces, restrooms, dry storage, etc. (7) Capacity of the surrounding roadways to handle boating traffic to and from the facility. (8) Compatible land uses. (9) Adequate wastewater treatment capacity in accordance with state standards. (10) . Commercial and multiuse private dock facility development shall be consistent with the special requirements for developing in the following areas: a. Aquatic preserves. b... Outstanding Florida Waters. c. Class II waters. d. Areas approved or conditionally approved by the State Department of Environmental Protection for shellfish harvesting. e. Other highly productive and/or unique habitats as determined by the State Department of Environmental Protection based on vegetation and/or wildlife species. (i) No commercial or multiuse private dock shall be constructed or expanded in areas determined by the State Department of Environmental Protection to be critical to the survival of the West Indian manatee.. 0) No new or substantial improvement to a commercial dock shall be approved until a hurricane plan for the project has been established. This requirement may be waived on projects for which the Director of Civil Emergency Services deems a hurricane plan unnecessary. (k) No docking facility will be permitted on the open sandy beaches of the Gulf of Mexico. (1) . No dock, boardwalk or pier will be permitted to be constructed parallel to the shoreline or seawall within the littoral zone between the mean high water line and the mean low water line. (m) No roofed structure other than covered boat slips and no vertical walls will be allowed.. (Ord. No. 94 -34, § 7.9,4-19-94; Ord. No. 96 -38, § 9,4-16-96) • • City of Clearwater Downtown Boat Slips Compliance with Article V. Water and Navigation Control Authority Regulation Sec. 166 -281. (b)(1) Would have a detrimental effect on the use of such waters for navigation, transportation, recreational or other public purposes and public conveniences. The project is located east of and outside the limits of the intra - coastal waterway, and will not interfere with navigation, transportation, or any other uses. Reviews by both The US Army Corps of Engineers & The United States Coast Guard revealed no detrimental effect on the areas surrounding the project site. The project is 48IM 4 with the Florida legislature's intent to provide access for the public to the navigable waters of the state. As such, Tthe project will in fact increase public conveniences and recreational advantages, allowing free public access to waterways, as well as Coachman Park and Downtown Clearwater. (2) Would restrict the free use of the waterways and navigable waters. The project site is completely outside the defined navigable wmers navigation channel,-and-will have -not restriction en-the free use of Clearwater Harbor, but rather will encourage and fully promote such free use. (3) Would have a material adverse effect upon the flow of water or tidal currents in the surrounding waters. A Wind & Wave Study conducted in 2006 by Olson & Associates analyzed tidal and wave action within the project site. The proposed floating dock system will not have a material adverse effect on tides or currents within Clearwater Harbor. Review by FDEP's hydrographic engineers had no concerns regarding water quality or mixing at the project location. (4) Would have a material adverse effect upon erosion, erosion control, extraordinary storm drainage, shoaling of channels, or would be likely to adversely affect the water quality presently existing in the area or limit progress that is being made toward improvement of water quality in the area. As discussed in (b)(3) above, the floating dock system will not impact the areas water quality through impeding mixing or flushing. In fact, the boat slips waxere designed to protect the existing seagrasses within the project area. The existing conditions do not prevent boaters attempting to reach the seawall from scarring seagrasses in the shallower waters. The boat slip design protects hundreds of lineal feet of seagrass beds, which will increase progress being made towards improving water quality in Clearwater Harbor. • 1 (5) Would have a material adverse effect upon the natural beauty and recreational advantages of the county. As mentioned above in (b)(1) the recreational opportunities for boaters are increased, as free side tie mooring slips will be made available to the general public. These slips will allow boaters safe public access to the water, Coachman Park and downtown Clearwater. The natural beauty of the area will also be preserved and expanded. This will be accomplished by protecting the seagrass beds and tidal mud flats that exist in the shallow waters. The boat slip project also includes the placement of rip rap along the city owned seawall, which will increase habitat for a variety of sea life that live and forage in this type of ecosystem. Protecting and isolating the existing seagrass beds from prop scars and boaters running aground will allow them to expand and increase density. The placement of the rip rap and protection of the seagrasses will introduce and encourage new sea life to utilize the area, which will increase the overall natural beauty of the area. The natural beauty of the area will certainly be enhanced by tThe upland improvements that will occur as a result of this project will also enhanee the natural beauty of the . project. Specifically, these improvements include (maybe we can provide more detail on the upland improvement ?) increased green space and native landscaping materials, which will be installed in the uplands areas adjacent to the project. Some of these improvements include repairs to the crumbling seawall and sidewalk along the he aged waterfront, adding landscaping and landscape islands to the bare asphalt parking lots, and provide low level lighting, park benches, and crosswalks. (6) Would have a material adverse effect upon the conservation of wildlife, marine life, and other natural resources, including beaches and shore, so to be contrary to the public interest. Since the entire shoreline of project area is seawall, beach and shore resources do not apply. Productive marine life will be enhanced as described above in (b)(5) with the protection of seagrasses and the installation of rip rap along the seawall. The project site is located in an active area of Clearwater Harbor with slow speed minimum wake zones already in_place. This facility will be a designated as a "Clean Marina" eliminating components that are viewed by some as problematic or harmful to marine life . life. For example, this facility will not sell fuel, be home to commercial uses, or have sanitary sewer plumbing at each slip. (7) Would have a material adverse effect upon the uplands surrounding or necessarily affected by such a plan or development. The project site is on submerged lands owned by the Ceity of Clearwater. The project is located in the Downtown Zoning District, for which the zoning and use is compatible. The project will be surrounded by Coachman Park on the north, the 0 0 Harbor View Convention Center, & Bayfront Tennis Complex to the east, and the Pierce 100 Condominium Tower on the south. The Memorial Causeway Bridge & Bayfront Promenade divides the project into the north and south basins. The Pierce 100 Condominium property is not zoned residential, but is a residential use, in the downtown zoning district. The boat slip project will likely increase the property values of surrounding properties, adding another element of interest and beauty to the area. The actual design of the project took into consideration the residential use to its south. All the day- tripper, transient side tie slips were located in the north basin, closest to Coachman Park. In addition, the dock master office with restroom and laundry facilities is located at the north end of the project. The concrete dock materials themselves were chosen because they minimize noise, much better than traditional wood or aluminum docks. (8) Would have a material adverse effect on the safety, health and welfare of the general public. The boat slip project adds an element of safety to the downtown waterfront, which has not existed in the past. With this project comes a 24 hour a day Dock Master security office, which will focus on the safety and welfare of the general public. Further, as discussed above, the health and welfare of the general public is promoted through additional recreational opportunities and enhanced green space. (9) Are inconsistent with adopted State plans (i.e., manatee protection, SWIM plans), county and municipal comprehensive plans, other formally adopted natural resource management plans, or other County ordinances or regulations. This project has gone through all State, Federal and local reviews for permitting. The project was designed or altered to meet the requirements of all reviewing agencies, and complies with all regulations and ordinances. The Florida legislature has proactively supported the important state interest in maintains viable water - dependent support facilities and access to the state's navigable waters. Florida Statute expressly recognizes that Florida experiences a $71 billion economic impact from tourism and boating. The City of Clearwater has taken the requisite action to revitalizing its coastal and waterfront areas by amending its Comprehensive Plan, which implements a Future Land Use Element requiring that redevelopment activities be sensitive to the city's waterfront and promote public access to the city's waterfront resources, and a Coastal Management Element encouraging the preservation of recreational and commercial working waterfronts and marinas and other water - dependent activities. As to the Downtown Boatslips Proiect specifically, the City has conscientiously refrained from including any commercial aspect to the project in consideration of the adjoining residential citizens, and focused instead on the public access to waterways, Sec. 166 -283. Mitigation and enhancement. 0 0 (a) The Authority may consider proposals for mitigation in the review of permit applications under this article. The replacement requirements for legally impacted wetlands shall be defined on a square footage basis and shall use, as a minimum, one acre (or portion thereof) created for each acre adversely impacted. Each acre (or portion thereof) created for each acre impacted. Each acre (or portion thereof) shall contain sufficient wetland replants to reestablish the wetland habitat with 85 percent coverage within three years. (b) Any proposal for mitigation under this article must be signed by a registered environmental professional (National Association of Environmental Professionals), a registered professional ecologist (Ecological Society of America), landscape architect, or other suitable recognized professional. (c) The Authority may require the enhancement of the local habitat where such enhancement may be reasonable expected to enhance the natural functions of the local ecosystem and where such enhancement will not place an undue hardship upon the applicant under this article. DC &A does not believe that the project will have a material adverse effect upon the conservation of wildlife, marine life, or other natural resources, including beaches and shores, so as to be contrary to the public interest, as described by Pinellas County Code Section 166- 281(b)(6). Ultimately, the state and federal agencies charged with protection of these resources will make a final determination whether a "material adverse effect" is likely; receipt of permits from state and federal authorities would indicate agreement with our opinion. Pinellas County Code Section 166 -283 discusses legally impacted wetlands. No wetlands, as defined by state or federal regulations will be directly impacted by the proposed project, and therefore, no mitigation is proposed. Furthermore, marine habitats of high ecological value, as listed in Pinellas County Code Section 166 -284, will not be directly impacted by the proposed project. The Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) has reviewed baseline water quality information for the project area, and as of 12 March 2009, DC &A is not aware of any outstanding concerns of FDEP regarding water quality or mixing /flushing at the project site. The application to FDEP for an environmental resource permit (ERP) for the proposed project is being reviewed under file #52- 0265938 -002. Should DEP require water quality monitoring during, or following, project construction, DC &A will inform the City." Section 166 -284 (c) As discussed above, this project was designed around the natural resources (seagrass beds), in a way that protects them from further impact. The addition of rip rap along the city owned seawall, provides a new eco- system for a variety of species to thrive in. The grass beds will become more dense and provide more nursery and feed oppoi4enities - andopportunities and juvenile fish habitat. PROGRESS MEETING BOAT SLIPS, PROMENADE & UPLAND IMPROVEMENTS Friday March 6, 2009 11:00 MSB Planning Room 216 AGENDA I. Boat Slips Permitting Update • Pinellas County. Water & Navigation. Permit • FDEP Permit •. ACOE Permit H. Promenade Update • Promenade construction will be completed this month.. • Temporary upland access is in- place until the upland improvements are completed along with the boat slip project. III. Upland Improvements • 100% plans. are ready for bid, but waiting to tie down permitting dates on the boat slips before advertising the project. • Dock Master Office — remodel is ongoing.. CADocuments and Settings \Wayne.Wells\Local Settings \Temporary Internet Files \OLK8F\Agenda Progress Meeting_06.09.2009.doc /I 01111.w — �CENrERUNE INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY PER CHANNEL LIGHTS — — • — — — — — — — - — - — — — — — — — _ CENTERUNE INTRACOASTAL WAT AY PER CHANNEL LIGHTS _ _ — — _ . _ • _ , — , DEDICATED BOAT SUP NUMBER ® SIDE TIE MOORINGS 8 @18' LIMITS OF 1925 LAND GRANT LOGE DOCKA 551SUPS 10 1@21' -3" 4 9@1y-7- OF INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY P [TOP OF CHANNEL SLOPE) rr FLOATING WAVE ATTENUATOR q 2 @ 17 -1" DOCKB 4USUPS SANITARY PUMP OUT 14 @17 � - . —._.— — _ . — . — 1@27 49C -D• _ _ _ _ _ LOCATION — —_ — — — — — _ — _ — . —. —.— _.— 535 -4' 107-4• I - — ' — ' — — FLOATING WAVE ATTEN/U/��A�TOR 1 ice`---- _�--------- - - - - -- ___ - ___ ----- _ - - - - -- FLOATING--- - WAVE ATTENUATOR _._ _ -� __- - -- LT_-- 15 2 @174' 3D' FOR FOOT 12 @ 17 -- - 10 4 1 1 1 1 2 @ fY -1" DOCKD 30'SUPS © 1O 2 3 ® 5 © 7 ®O9 1D 11 12 13 14 15 16 11 18 19 0 22 23 24 K 42 ® ® 45 46 47 ® 49 ® 51 52 53 54 55 ® 57 ® 59 60 61 62 LENGTH QTY WIDTH DOCK IY ® g® 12 @ 1S' DOCK 59SUPS v, DIOCK ® DOSTING PER I DOCK A 45'SUPS 12 Q12 DOCK 45'SUPS 5 `MOORING PILE (TYP.) E (j CONCRETE FLOATING DOCK �J/� ® ELEVATED OBE RETAINED QTY 16 30'SUPS CONCRETE FLOATING DOCK MOORING PILE (TYP.) QTY 17 49SUPS QTY 41 51YSLIPS Q TOTAL DEDICATED SUPS =126 NORTH BA IN® GANGWA 229' -T 1Y SOS -10" ® W (n ; .:: ••, I DOCK B Y 2s 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 O 36 DOCK F� s3 64 65 66 67 66 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 n 78 _j '1 � ; .., ., •. •. LIMITS OF 1925 LAND GRANT 1 �¢ 0 7 •',. •,•••. I R `2 W � 38 J '�••1, PILE SUPPORTS FOR FLOATING DOCKS '.•••,.''••. '•••.,;.,.••''•.,.•.,.•,.,.•,•. •',.•, ., •••, •.,'••'.,,,•,• 1• .•'', •.. '•, •'•.. 8 79 80 81 82 83 84 65 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 © PROMENADE 39 • (CURRENTLY UNDER CONSTRUCTION B'! SEPARATE PERMIT 40 •: •' :.'''••:,;,' :•,'''' - I td SOUTH BASIN • ® CONCRETE FLOATING DOCK � •:$EA.V�,LE:•; :,.;;: t DOCK C � 96 97 98 99 100 101 1 10 04 1 106 10 109 110 :' •p)' • ' • FLOATING DOCK /WALKWAY \ \ I I O I o I I OA 1 vO 1 1 1 1 \ \ \ \ \ NO. DESCRIPTION to 0 ORIGINAL SUBMITTAL Z 1 REVISED MARINA LAYOUT PER SHOREMASTER S DELETED SLIP 2 a 2 REVISED FOLLOWING DEP COMMENTS 3 ADDED TRANSIENT SLIPS AND SECTIONS DOCK D —BOAT ACCESS EAST OF DOCK D TO BE PREVENTED BY THE USE OF 'NO ACCESS' SIGNAGE REVETMENT T( (INCLUDING 2' BUFFER) i I 1 003 B 005 J� P c,� � v �Q O� O FOR FOOT ELEVATED DATEBY __..___....... _.- _... -_.. _. ..- __.._. /26/08 CL Hatcrow 00/08 CL Halcrow Inc. !/16/08 CL 4010 Boy Scout Boulevard, Suite 580 Brian R. Tanberg, P.E. Tampa, FL 33607 (813) 876-6800 Registration No. 45401 $102/09 CL CERTIFICATE OF AUTHORIZATION: 26480 L�J I 2 ONZ� N 5D' D 25' 50' 100' \ GRAPHIC SCALE \\ 1" = 50' ON 24 "x36" SHEET LEGEND E161I110 SEAGRASS BEDS LENGTH (SURVEY UNDERTAKEN BY WIDTH DELTA W&N INCORPORATED MAT 2006) 21 DEDICATED BOAT SUP NUMBER ® SIDE TIE MOORINGS FOR PERMIT ONLY SUBMITTED DATE: 03/02/2009 AS DRANK BY MISENER NI/►RINh ��i CHECKED BY 0 CL I 'CONSTRUCTION C i ORLON A4ARINE (i11 . " 'PROJECT ENGR 4 , 2009 DEDICATED BOAT SUP SCHEDULE SOUTHBASIN LENGTH QTY WIDTH ' @ 19-4r DOCK 501SUPS 11 8 @18' 1 @ 19 -6' DOCKA 551SUPS 10 1@21' -3" 9@1y-7- 2 @ 17 -1" DOCKB 4USUPS 17 14 @17 1@27 2@19,4. DOCK SO SUPS 16 12 @ 19 2 @ 18' -35' 1 @ 17 -9• DOCK 4USUPS 15 2 @174' 12 @ 17 2 @ fY -1" DOCKD 30'SUPS 16 12 @12' NORTH BASIN LENGTH QTY WIDTH DOCK RYSUPS 14 2 @ 284 12 @ 1S' DOCK 59SUPS 30 30 @18 DOCK 45'SUPS 12 12 @17 DOCK 45'SUPS 5 5 @17' TOTAL DEDICATED SLIPS QTY 16 30'SUPS QTY 32 40'SUPS QTY 17 49SUPS QTY 41 51YSLIPS QTY 20 55'SUPS TOTAL DEDICATED SUPS =126 NOTES: 1. PILE OLR -OFF HEIGHT IS +10' MLW DDCK LEVEL IS +24' MLW. 2. IN ADDITION TO THE DEPICTED MOORING PILES. ADDITIONAL FILES WILL BE REOUIREO FOR ALL OF THE FLOATING WAVE ATTENUATORS AND FLOATINO OOD" 3. WIDTH OF WATERRODY IS APPR00MATELY 3,168 FT. TOTAL LENGTH OF WATERFRONT IS APPRIMOMATELY 1,650 FT. CITY OF CLEARWATER 100 So. Myrtle Ave., Clearwater, Florida DOWNTOWN CLEARWATER BOAT SUPS DEP FILE NUMBER 52- 0265938 -002 ENGINEERING PLAN DATE 3 DRAWING NO. 001 J Wells, Wayne From: Mahony, Laura Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2009 3:48 PM To: Irwin, Rod; Quillen, Michael; Chesney,. Ed; Morris, William D.; Simmons, Margie; Castelli, Joelle. Wiley; Dougall- Sides, Leslie; Wells, Wayne Cc: Barden,. Carol; Hollander, Gwen; Harriger,. Sandy; Josef, Veronica; Lutz, Deb All: In the course of finalizing our permit application for the County. Boat Slips permit we will need to provide all documentation . of our due diligence efforts as. the project developed and progressed. Please gather all relevant documentation related to your department's participation in the project, including but not limited to: • the referendum • all public contact, meetings, publications, website materials, community meetings,. focus. groups, etc. • Council agenda items • CDB application and associated materials • relevant zoning information (zoned for downtown with adjacent residential use) • riparian rights. analysis • design and construction. considerations, concessions in light of public input • relevant security measures for the area (24 hour, cameras, etc.) • upland improvements, enhancements,. design (i.e., location of the dockmaster office as far from the residential use as possible) • any other information you deem relevant The County cannot set a date for hearing on the permit until we provide all of information we want them to consider in the course of reviewing our application. Therefore, please gather and provide hard copies of all. materials ASAP in no event later than Friday, March 13. We will discuss further. in this Friday's meeting should you have questions. Thank you. Laura Lipowski Mahony Assistant City Attorney City of Clearwater P.O. Box 4748 Clearwater, Florida 33758. (727) 562 -4010 phone. (727) 562 -4021 fax Board. Certified in Real. Estate Law • Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2008 7:52 AM To: Carnley, Rick; Chesney, Ed Subject: RE: Harbormaster Building. GRE You can submit for a building permit at any time now. Wayne - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Carnley, Rick Sent: Monday, November 10, 2008 12:15 PM To: Chesney, Ed; Wells, Wayne Subject: RE: Harbormaster Building Thanks Ed. - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Chesney, Ed Sent: Monday, November 10, 2008 9:30 AM To: Carnley, Rick; Wells, Wayne Subject: RE: Harbormaster Building Rick, there was no appeal. Therefore, proceed as scheduled. - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Carnley, Rick Sent: Monday, November 10, 2008 8:11 AM To: Chesney, Ed; Wells, Wayne Subject: Harbormaster Building 11 Can you give me a status on the CDB appeal process and when you think we can start the renovation work on the building? Thanks, Rick Camley Emergency Manager Asst. Director Solid Waste /General Services Office 727 - 562 -4891 Cell 727 - 224 -7072 f • _' Page 1 of 2 R� City - sticks to boat slip plan By M ke..Brasgeld_, Times staff writer Published Tuesday, November 4, 2008 6:59 PM. 127 boat slips planned 500 people have expressed interest in renting the slips $500 is the amount of the deposit to get into the lottery for a slip $15.50 cost of a slip per foot per month (slips are 30 to 55 feet) CLEARWATER — Even as the city forges ahead with its plan to build 127 boat slips near Coachman Park, opponents of the idea are still fighting it. They're questioning whether Clearwater really will be able to rent out the slips in this slow economy. So far, only one boater has put down a deposit for a space. In addition, residents of the neighboring Pierce 100 condominium are objecting to the $12.8- million project as it moves through regulatory hurdles in order to get permits from the county, state and federal governments. But Clearwater officials say their belief in the boat slips hasn't wavered. They say the new docks will be good for boaters, will boost downtown development and will eventually generate income for the city. "We want to make our downtown a destination point," said City Council member Carlen Petersen. "Our waterfront is under - utilized. We need to take advantage of this opportunity to create a working recreational waterfront." Last year, city voters narrowly approved the plan to build the boat slips as well as a promenade, boardwalk and fishing pier in Clearwater Harbor. The city promised the project would be self- supporting within a few years. The boat slips will be from 30 to 55 feet long, and rents will be $15.50 per foot per month.. After officials said more than 500 people had expressed interest in renting the 127 slips, the city recently came up with a lottery to assign the spaces. People must send in a $500 deposit by January to enter. They are to learn in March whether they'll get one of the slips. So far, exactly one person has entered this lottery. That's prompting opponents to say, We told you so. "The City Commission should not proceed with this project unless they are sure they can make good on their promise that it will not cost the people of Clearwater any tax money," said Anne Gams of Save the Bayfront, a group that fought the boat slips. However, city officials are far from panic mode. They're hearing that many boaters are waiting until after the holidays to part with a $500 deposit. And the docks themselves won't be finished until next summer at the earliest. "This project has a 40 -year life span. It might take a couple of years for the economy to rebound and for us to get it fully operational, but it will pay. for itself," said Bill Morris, director of the city's marine and aviation department. 'This is a short-term economic hurdle." The neighbors Pierce 100 condo owners, who fought a long and unsuccessful battle against the route of the new Memorial Causeway bridge, are now opposing the boat http:// www. tampabay. com/ news/ localgovemment/article890110.ece 11/5/2008 Page 2 of 2 0 slips. At a recent city zoning hearing, they argued that the project will come too close to their property; that it will be too noisy; that it could harm manatees, dolphins and sea grasses in the harbor; and that it doesn't follow the city's own codes governing docks and development.. "1 think it's a good project. It's just in the wrong location," said Jackson Bowman, a lawyer for the condominium association. Despite their opposition, the city's Community. Development Board recently approved the project. Board members felt the docks would be a welcome addition to a downtown that already has a mix of condos, businesses and public spaces. But the city still must secure permits from the Florida Department of Environmental Protection, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and the Pinellas County Water and Navigation Control Authority. Among other things, the city will have to prove that its floating concrete docks won't hurt the environment. The city is confident its project will pass muster environmentally and that it fits in with its surroundings. But Pierce 100 residents will be opposing it every step of the way. "This is just the first hurdle that the city has to get over," Bowman, the Pierce 100 attorney, said after the zoning hearing. He added that residents probably won't appeal the city board's decision. "I think where the condo association should put its time is to try to stop it at the state and the Corps level." Mike Brassfield can be reached at brassfield @sptimes.com or (727) 445 -4160. © 2008 •, All Rights Reserved •. St_ Petersburg Times 490 First Avenue South • St. Petersburg, FL 33701 • 727- 893 -8111. Contact Us I Join Us I Advertise with Us I Subscribe to the Times Privacy_Policy I Standard of Accuracy Tern—sConditions.. &_Copyright http: / /www.tampabay.com /news /localgovem-ment/article89011 O.ece 11/5/2008 xKxw��i Conditions Associated With FLD2008 -08026 210 DREW ST Engineering Condition Steve Doherty 562 -4773 08/25/2008 General Note: DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may Not Met be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. Storm Water Condition Phuong Vo 562 -4752 08/21/2008 The following shall be addressed prior to issuance of the Building Permit: 1. Sheet C -15: Provide invert elevations and slope of the proposed 18" RCP. _ 2. Sheet C -15: Provide a detail of the proposed gutter grate. Please show the connection of this grate with the adjacent structure and /or pavement in a larger scale. 3. Sheet C -17: Provide a detail of proposed inlet type C. 4. Sheet C -17: Provide invert elevations and slope of the proposed 15" RCPs 5. Sheet. C -17: What type of manhole is proposed on the existing pipe? Will it be a doghouse type? Provide a detail of this proposed manhole. General note: 1. DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. Traffic Eng Condition Bennett Elbo 562 -4775 08/18/2008 The following to be addressed prior to a Building Permit: 1. On page D -1 of the detail page see handicap parking sign, change the Florida Statute number to read "F.S. 318.18 ". 2. Add to the projects detail sheet the F.D.O.T.'s truncated dome detail (Index 304 page 6 of 6). See link provided: http: / /www. dot. state. fl .us /rddesign /rd /RTDS /08 /304.pdf 3. The City's parallel parking dimensions are measured 8' wide by 23' long. If the parallel parking spaces along Cleveland Street and Drew Street are striped to 23' in length then the applicant can aqcuire more public parking spaces. General Note(s): , 1) Applicant shall comply with the current Transportation Impact Fee Ordinance and fee schedule and paid prior to a Certificate of Occupancy (C.O.). 2) DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments maybe forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. Zoning Condition Wayne Wells, AICP 727 - 562 -4504 08/27/2008 10/10/08 - WW Will handle at building permit stage with a lease necessary prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Completion. 8/27/08 - WW City of Clearwater Land Ownership - This paragraph describes what submerged land the City owns. Can there be submitted a map showing what the City owns (even if 8.5 "x11" in size) with an indication (generally) where a lease will be necessary from the State? 08/27/2008 10/01/08 - WW Require change for the HC space at time of building permit. 8/27/08 - WW Sheet C -11 - Parking spaces have been dimensioned as nine -feet wide typically with an overall dimension of 36'. It was previously recommended to make the landscape island on the south side of the handicap parking space 0.9 feet larger. Instead, the HC space has been widened to 13 feet. Reduce the HC space to 12 feet and convert the 0.9 or 1 -foot to landscaping as previoiusly requested. Not Met Not Met Not Met Not Met CaseConditons Print Date: 11/03/2008 2— Page 1 of�'' • FLD2008 -08026 210 DREW ST • Zoning Condition Wayne Wells, AICP 727- 562 -4504 08/27/2008 10/10/08 - WW Not Met Need to review at building permit stage to ensure no holding tank is over water. 8/27/08 - WW Response to Section 3 -603.0 - Response appears inconsistent with that in the Response to Section 3- 603.A, where sewerage pump out is proposed. Need to expound and clarify. 08/27/2008 10/10/08 - WW Not Met Require rain.sensor at time of building permit. 8/27/08 - WW Sheet D -6 (should be C -22) - Revise the Landscape Schedule for the following: a. Indicate for the LI, LI2 and LJ that they must be a minimum of 2" caliper at time of planting; and b. Indicate there must be a rain sensor for the irrigation system. 08/27/2008 10/10/08 - ww Not Met Require at time of building permit. 8/27/08 - WW Need a detail for the compactor dumpster enclosure. Unclear how one gets into the dumpster enclosure to dump the trash. Unclear of the' exterior material and color of the dumpster enclosure, including the gates. 10/21/2008 Condition of Approval included in the Development Order: Not Met That living aboard non - transient vessels be prohibited, except as may be allowed for private tenants under the Private Docking Permit; 10/21/2008 Condition of Approval included in the Development Order: Not Met That there be no fueling facilities at this marina; 10/21/2008 Condition of Approval included in the Development Order: Not Met That no private tenants conduct any commercial business from any slip at this marina; 10/21/2008 Condition of Approval included in the Development Order: Not Met That ferry service may be permitted, with written prior permission from the City Manager or designee, to allow commercial vessels with a base operation in another location other than this marina to pick up and /or drop off customers at this marina; 10/21/2008 Condition of Approval included in the Development Order: Not Met That major servicing of vessels be prohibited, but permissible servicing of vessels be limited to routine maintenance and minor repairs necessary for the preservation and seaworthiness of the vessel, as determined by the Harbor Master; 10/21/2008 Condition of Approval included in the Development Order: Not Met That signage be permanently installed on the docks or at the entrance to the docks containing wording warning boaters of the existence of protected sea grasses and manatees in the vicinity; 10/21/2008 Condition of Approval included in.the Development Order: Not Met That a copy of the SWFWMD and /or FDEP Permit and Corps of Engineer's Permit, if applicable, be submitted to the Planning Department prior to commencement of construction; 10/21/2008 Condition of Approval included in the Development Order: Not Met That, prior to the issuance of any permit, compliance with all requirements of General Engineering, Traffic Engineering and Stormwater Engineering be met; 10/21/2008 Condition of Approval included in the Development Order: Not Met That the Public Art and Design Impact Fee be due on this project, pending transfer of impact fee funds. 11/03/2008 Prior to the commencement of construction, a copy of the proof of permission to use State Not Met submerged land be submitted to the Planning Department. Print Date: 11/03/2008 CaseConditons Page 2 oil Z x LL rw ater Fax Cover Me CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, 2ND FLOOR CLEARWATER, FL 33756 (727) 562 -4567 FAX: (727) 562 -4865 TO: is �o�.�� a�S DATE: FAX: gm- 62-1- k S-+ TELEPHONE: 810 - (o Z-7 - t I Z-4- FROM: Wayne M. Wells TELEPHONE: (727) 562 -4504 SUBJECT: o w A -cam � rla MESSAGE: —,I' a,- off- tA-b bo o,.+- w NUMBER OF SHEETS (INCLUDING THIS PAGE): L 2� aOEL U coacaE e . nnc DO N sEE DFw1s sln. 7 aF e Yana Noa CO.REIF nunnwa oocK_ 9 _• LIMIT OF USE s E OETNS vn. , Dr e \ I >w U B �. �a Y I—.. —la >d -,..11 i.' -,� �1 >r -„ _, _�,• � ,.._,� 11 >< -,� I� �. -�p I�.,. DOCK A SOUTH BASIN p OCK C T es 0. ' v YAab �7r -�1 00 OCK D a co) sv' mr ZO Ozl_ �nTh�xa E O O�j O ORIGM —i. SEEP 1 2006 PWINWIG DWART EW1, CRY OF CtEA?WAR MFAGE P FACIU1rts C) 0 a c N F a cTyp OF C 1490' UN -CE LINE OF R) YODa 65a WY OF 6FNWTORT7E� 4�.77 AIiENUAiOR 7a GOON /� OETNLfi SM. F 6 / S sR m ,m GRAPHIC SCALE 1• =50' FINAL SLIP LAYOUT AUGUST 29, 2008 SLIPSCHEDULE NORTH BASIN QTY WIDTH DOCK a x 19 IY FLENGTH u u 1T 6 7 IT SOUTH BASIN QTY WIDTH OOCKA '@'6' 9 6 -S' ..A ml SUPS x O 5' xY.<.ti• N 19' S A UI S. DOCIte -SUPS IT 19 lT DOCKe SO'SUPS 16 x I6''.IxS• 6 9 DOCKC AS'SUP7 l5 1T DDOCKD 30'sUP7 Ifi tY TOTAL SLIPS msuvs — WSUPS DTYm 11.1UPS OTY0 W. SUPS OTY]t S6'SUPS TOTAL SLIPS =127 Ylasn.r Yarins CRnslrvc6an, Ine. T9mv9, OwH9 snARVm s in1L wv°ri� ti APPROVAL REQUIRED EI APP VEO AS v 6MHiE0 0 APPRaWD vein CC—S 0 .1. AND . SU-T .17V T F' CDB Meeting Date: Case Number: Agenda Item:. Owner /Applicant: Representative:. Address: • October 21, 2008 FLD2008 -08026 E4 City of Clearwater Michael Quillen, PE, City En ing eerin 210 Drew Street CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT, STAFF REPORT GENERAL INFORMATION: f h b N REQUEST: Flexible Development approval to permit a marina for 127 slips in the Downtown (D) District with a reduction to the side (north) setback from 135.7 to 19 feet, a reduction to the side (south) setback from 135.7 to 7.67 feet and an increase to the maximum width from 75% of the lot width (1,017.7 feet) to 109.8% of the lot width (1,490 feet), under the provisions of Sections 2- 903.1-1, 3- 601.C.3 and 3 -603. CURRENT ZONING: Downtown (D) and Preservation (P) Districts CURRENT FUTURE LAND Central Business District (CBD) Category USE CATEGORY: PROPERTY USE: Current Use: Coachman Park;. Parking lots; Water Proposed Use: Marina for 127 slips EXISTING North: Downtown District Overnight accommodations SURROUNDING ZONING (Sandcastle Resort) AND USES: South: Downtown District Attached dwellings (Pierce 100 Condos) East: Downtown District Coachman Park, City. Main Library, Stein Mart, Waters Edge, City Hall West: Preservation District Water (Clearwater Harbor) ANALYSIS: Site Location and Existing Conditions: The 23.96 acres is located along the Downtown Clearwater Harbor between Drew Street (north). and Pierce Street (south).. The overall site is currently developed with the Coachman Park, City. Main Library, Harborview Center, Stein Mart .and City Hall. The proposed marina will utilize and make improvements to those areas of the subject property adjacent to or in Clearwater Harbor.. The site has approximately 1,357 feet of waterfront frontage on Clearwater Harbor between the north and south property lines. There currently exists a public fishing pier on the north side of the project that will remain and be expanded as part of the marina.. On the pilings of the old Memorial Causeway Bridge that was torn down, the City is constructing a Promenade. that will stretch into the water approximately 200 . feet and be adjacent to the dock in the North Basin. On March 13, 2007, Clearwater voters approved a referendum providing for the construction of the proposed downtown boat slips for a maximum of 140 slips. Community Development Board — October. 21, 2008. FLD2008 -08026 —. Page 1 of 10. 0 . . 0 The upland area of the waterfront being improved as part of this application currently includes a small storage building on the north side at 210 Drew Street, two surface parking lots adjacent to the water (one under the Memorial Causeway Bridge and one north of Cleveland Street) and on- street parking areas along Drew and Cleveland Streets. Abutting on the north side of the subject property exists the Sandcastle Resort on the north side of Drew Street between S. Ft. Harrison Avenue and the water. The Pierce 100 Condominiums abut on the south side of the south boat slip basin. Development Proposal: The proposal is for. a municipal marina, where the primary users will be the boaters who lease dock space, transient boaters visiting Clearwater, recreational boaters docking for events or activities in Coachman Park or downtown and the general public visiting the waterfront area. The development proposal consists of the construction of a marina consisting of a 127 -slip, concrete floating dock system. A floating concrete structure was chosen for this project as being the most aesthetically pleasing, easiest to maintain and allowing the docks to rise and fall with the tides (greatly increasing their durability during storm events). The docks are designed to maximize views of the waterfront at both the pedestrian and bluff levels. No covered boatlifts, roof structures or vertical walls are proposed as part of this project. Due to FDOT requirements, no permanent slips can be situated under the new Memorial Causeway Bridge, which separates the marina into a North Basin and a South Basin. The North Basin will have 41 slips. The slips will be accessed by boaters on the north side close to the existing public fishing pier and will include an expanded public dock for fishing. Tenants and the public will access the dock in the North Basin adjacent to the Promenade. The South Basin will have 86 slips and boaters will access the slips on the south end on the west side of the Pierce 100 Condominiums. Tenants will access the dock at a point close to the north end of the southern parking lot (under the new Memorial Causeway Bridge). Boat slip lengths will range between 30 — 55 feet. The design of the docks in both the North and South Basins accommodates maintenance vessels for the bridge and a minimum 30 -foot clearance around the bridge support columns and bases. The dock design in the North Basin also accommodates the Promenade, which is a separate City project constructing a pier approximately 200 feet out into Clearwater Harbor on the pilings of the old Memorial Causeway Bridge. On the outside (west side) of the docks in both the North and South Basins adjacent to the channel, as well as the south side of the dock in the North Basin adjacent to the new Memorial Causeway Bridge, the docks accommodate the transient side tie of boats up to 25 feet in width and 100 feet in length or larger for persons traveling up and down the coast (staying for a few days or a week) or for boaters attending events or activities in Coachman Park or the downtown. Boats moored at these transient side ties will be sufficiently set back from the centerline of the channel of the Intracoastal Waterway so as to not impact the safety or navigation of boats in the channel or at the side ties. The outside (west side) of the docks, as well as the ends of docks, is designed as wave attenuators to reduce wave impacts on boats moored in the slips. In the North Basin, the existing public fishing pier will be extended to provide wave attenuation and be linked to the dock on the south side for the protection of sea grasses adjacent to the seawall. The docks in the North Basin will also provide for a ferry landing, although the exact location has not yet been determined. The ferry landing can provide a pre - arranged place of loading or off - loading of customers boarding commercial boats or water taxis between the mainland and the beach. Such allowance would allow commercial vessels where their base operation is somewhere other than this marina to pick up or drop off customers lessening parking demands on Clearwater Beach. Sea grasses in the South Basin will also be protected from boat encroachment by a floating boat barrier between the seawall adjacent to the Pierce 100 Condominiums and Dock D, the easternmost dock in the South Basin. The proposal contains three primary components: (1) the floating docks and wave attenuators, (2) the renovation and expansion of the existing building at the north end for a harbor master office and (3) upland parking improvements including a drop -off area for boaters or persons accessing the ferry, enhanced landscaping, sidewalks and public art. The docks and wave attenuators have been discussed Community Development Board — October 21, 2008 FLD2008 -08026 — Page 2 of 10 0 0 above. The existing building on the north end at Drew Street will be renovated and expanded toward the south to provide for a harbor master's office, as well as providing restrooms, showers and laundry facilities for persons using the docks in the existing portion of the structure. The building will be made handicap accessible. A new blue, standing seam metal roof will be added, including additional gables on the east and west sides for visual interest. The building will be finished with gray cement plank or similar siding and white trim. The upland improvements will upgrade existing conditions along the waterfront. Based on a parking ratio of one parking space per two slips and 127 proposed slips, a total of 64 parking spaces are required for this marina. There are two existing parking lots that will be upgraded to provide parking for the marina.. The northern parking lot is adjacent to the water just north of Cleveland Street and will provide 20. parking spaces. Interior landscape islands will be added, the edges of the pavement curbed, a new sidewalk constructed adjacent to the seawall and the parking lot landscaped. The southern parking lot, located under the new Memorial Causeway Bridge and adjacent to the water, is accessed from Pierce Street and will provide 46 parking spaces. Interior landscaping will be added, primarily defining drive aisles around the bridge support column, the edges of the pavement curbed, a new sidewalk constructed adjacent to the seawall and the parking lot landscaped. Sidewalks along the seawall adjacent to these two parking lots will be wider than normal and will be raised to act as wheel stops for vehicles. These two parking lots combined provide the minimum parking required for the proposed marina. However, on- street parking along Cleveland Street west of the driveway entrance to the Harborview Center /Stein Mart and along Drew Street between Cleveland Street and the driveway to the Sandcastle Resort will be upgraded with bulb -out landscape islands to define parking space rows. After the completion of the improvements, there will be a total of 59 on- street parking spaces within the area of construction mentioned. Crosswalks to the parking lot at the Harborview Center /Stein Mart and to Coachman Park will be constructed. The median at the intersection of Cleveland and Drew Streets will be landscaped. Drop off areas will be constructed within the streets at the end of Cleveland Street and at the harbor master building for persons accessing the ferry or for dropping off gear and persons for the slips. Large paved areas adjacent to the proposed harbor master building will be removed and landscaped. A new trash enclosure will be constructed adjacent to the harbor master building. The areas along Cleveland and Drew Streets will be landscaped, as well as new lighting installed. Fire hydrants and fire risers will be installed for fire protection purposes for boats moored at the docks. .�� A marina is subject to the relevant review criteria of Sections 2- 903.H, 3- 601.C.3 and 3 -603. The proposed marina is not located in any of the areas of environmental significance listed in the criteria, with the exception of its proximity to Clearwater Harbor grass beds. ea grass beds were mapped prior to the dock design phaseJThe proposed docks in both the North and outh Basins have been located in a manner to avoid any sea grasses. 17 are no residentirNo zoned properties adjacent to the proposed dock (adjacent properties are zoned Downtown District). commercial activities will be permitted in the leased slips. Living aboard non - transient vessels will prohibited. Private tenants (those who lease slips) may be permitted to stay aboard a total of eight nights a month, so that they may enjoy the benefit of using their vessel during select weekends or when in conjunction with a family vacation or holiday. Transient guests (those that travel from marina to marina much like those that travel in a recreational vehicle from RV park to RV park) will be permitted to stay aboard their vessels while visiting Clearwater (an average stay of three days at the Beach Marina). There will be no fueling facilities, boat launching or dry storage of boats at this marina. Sewage pump -out facilities are proposed in both the North and South Basins, but such facilities will be a vacuum system linked to the upland sewer system so that there will be no holding tanks located over water. The proposed harbor master building on the north side complies with the Downtown Design Guidelines. Other than the small dock for the Pierce 100 Condominium, there are no other docks in close proximity to the proposed project. The proposal has been sensitively designed at an appropriate scale, character and intensity to complement neighborhood residential, commercial and recreational uses proximate to the Community Development Board — October 21, 2008 FLD2008 -08026 — Page 3 of 10 • • site. This municipal marina, as approved by the voters in 2007, is envisioned as another catalytic project contributing to the redevelopment of the downtown. The upscale design of the docks and the proposed parking, roadway, public art and landscaping will ensure the project is in harmony with the neighborhood. ince there are no other docks in close proximity (other than the small dock for the Pierce -� 100 Condominiums), there is no established dock pattern to be compatible with and there are no other �(��V marinas in close proximity. The proposed dock has been designed to be sufficiently set back from the centerline of the channel of the Intracoastal Waterway to not have any detrimental effects on the use of the adjacent waters for navigation, while still allowing for the side tie of vessels on the outside of the . wave attenuators, as established by the US Army Corps of Engineers. The channel is well marked and a slow speed minimum wake zone is in place between Pierce 100 and the Seminole. Boat Launch Ramp to maximize boater safety. Access to the docks is limited to three points to also maximize boater safety. Existing sea grasses are currently unprotected from boaters entering the are The proposal will restrict access to these sea grass beds, thereby protecting them from boaters t ough the pedestrian dock paralleling the seawall in the North Basin and a floating boat barrier in the South Basin. While manatees frequent the area, it is not expected that the addition of the marina will increase the threat to manatees. A manatee protection plan will be required as part of the State and/or Federal permitting process. The proposed marina will not adversely impact marine resources found along the seawall and underneath the public fishing dock. Water depths beneath the proposed boat slips range from approximately five feet to approximately 16 feet. The water depth under Dock D in the South Basin is the shallowest at 4.9 feet at mean low tide, which provides more than the one -foot clearance distance between the bottom of the vessel and the bottom of the water body at mean low tide. These slips in Dock D have been designed to accommodate the smallest vessels with the least draft, which is sufficient to not adversely impact bottomlands. The docks as designed will not cause erosion to bottomlands by vessels utilizing this facility. he City will be seeking a Florida Clean Marina designation, which is voluntary non - regulated — program esignation for the facility that acknowledges and rewards environmentally conscious marina facilities. There will be no material adverse impact on wildlife, marine life and other natural resources. There are no beaches proximate to the site and additional protection to the existing seawalls is anticipated as part of the project design. The layout of the slips, docks and pedestrian walkways, coupled with the proposed Clean Marina designation and compliance with County, State and Federal permitting requirements, serve to ensure the proposed facility will not have adverse impacts on the habitats listed in Section 3- 601.C.3.f.ii. There are no upland habitats of significance impacted by the project. Servicing of boats will be limited to routine maintenance and minor repairs necessary for the preservation and seaworthiness of the vessel that respect boats moored in other slips, much as is permitted at the Beach Marina, and will be monitored by the Harbor Master staff. Such routine maintenance and minor repairs include, but may not be limited to, mechanical adjustment, minor painting, leak seals and rot prevention. Major repairs would require the boat to be brought to appropriate off -site repair facilities. Servicing of boats allowed at this facility will be limited to the hours between 6:00 am to 9:00 pm. The City's Harbor Master has determined the proposed marina will pose no hazard or obstruction to navigation. Trash receptacles are being provided on the upland at both the North and South Basins to allow boaters to dispose of trash when leaving their vessels. Trash from these receptacles will be placed by City personnel in the trash dumpster proposed to be located next to the harbor master building on the north end. In the event of a spill, the City has a containment process utilizing absorbent booms and pads to contain the spills. Requirements of the Pinellas County Inland Navigation Control Authority, Florida Department of Environmental Protection and the US Army Corps of Engineers are more stringent than City regulations and these docks are subject to these more stringent regulations. The marina project represents an appropriate addition to the waterfront and complements the downtown redevelopment plan and neighboring properties. The scale and coverage of the proposed marina is appropriate for this location, as it has been designed to fit into the existing basin. The marina will not Community Development Board - October 21, 2008 FLD2008 -08026 -Page 4 of 10 0 0 hinder or discourage the appropriate development/redevelopment of adjacent properties. Moreover, the Harborview Center and Coachman Park will likely be redeveloped and improved as part of the City's ongoing downtown and waterfront redevelopment efforts. The marina is a key component of this redevelopment effort and will enhance recreational and pedestrian opportunities along the waterfront for permanent residents and tourists visiting the area. The boat slips and upland improvements will improve safety aspects along the waterfront. On- street parking areas will be enhanced with landscaping, as well as two off - street parking lots, and sidewalk and crosswalk improvements will significantly upgrade traffic circulation for vehicles as well as pedestrians. The community character of the area will be clearly enhanced through this waterfront improvement project. The marina will be staffed 24 hours a day, seven days a week and the marina will be monitored by a security camera system. Staffing will consist of a dock master office staff manned by a Marine Department personnel worker. from 6:30 am to 9:00 pm, and a Police Aide Security Guard from 9:00 pm to 6:30 am. Code Enforcement Analysis: There are no outstanding Code Enforcement issues associated with the subject property. COMPLIANCE WITH STANDARDS: With regards to setbacks, the dimensional standards criteria set forth in Section 3- 601.C.3.h of the Community Development Code state that docks shall be located no closer to any property line as extended into the water than the distance equivalent to ten percent of the width of the waterfront property line .he width of the waterfront property line is 1,357 feet; therefore the proposed dock must be set back from the east and west property lines a minimum of 135.7 feet. The proposal includes a deviation to reduce the setback of the docks in both the North and South Basins below that required. The existing public fishing dock is set back from the extended north property line 19 feet. A wave attenuator extension to the west of the existing dock, which also provides access to the expanded public fishing pier to the south protecting the sea grasses adjacent to the seawall, will be set back approximately 66 feet. fThe closest portion of the proposed dock that will have boat slips is approximately 200 feet from the extended north property line, exceeding the minimum setback of 135.7 feet. There is no existing dock at the Sandcastle Resort north of this existing public fishing dock. There will be no navigation issues with the docks in the North Basin in regard to adjacent property[lhe Dock A in the South Basin is proposed at a minimum setback of 7.67 feet to the extended south property line (adjacent to the Pierce 100 Condominiums). Other portions of the proposed dock in the South Basin are setback from the seawall ng the south property line much greater, but still less than the required setback (Dock B — 81.67 feet; Dock C — 84.5 feet; and Dock D — 68 feet). The Pierce 100 Condominium (property juts out into the water, helping to form the South Basin. There is an existing, relatively small 1 ock for the Pierce 100 Condominium located close to the southern portion of the west side of the property, providing slips oriented north/south. We design of the docks in the South Basin has attempted to minimize wave action into the marina forte protection of the mo red boats, which represents a primary need for a setback reduction from the south property line extended. There are no navigation issues with the proposed docks in the South Basin in regard to the adjacent property. With regards to length, the dimensional standards criteria set forth in Section 3- 601.C.3.h of the Community Development Code state that commercial docks shall not extend from the mean high water line or seawall of the subject property more than 75 percent of the width of the subject property as measured along the waterfront property line; thus the length of the dock cannot exceed 1,017.75 fee r-A s proposed, the dock has a maximum length of 685 feet from the southeast corner of the east seawall e wes tern edge of the proposed dock in the South Basin. This dimension diminishes as it moves to the southwest in the South Basin and diminishes as it moves northward through the North Basin. The proposal is less than and therefore meets the maximum allowable length of the docks The same threshold in Section 3- 601.C.3.h that applies to length also applies to width; therefore the width of the proposed dock cannot exceed 1,017.75 feet. The dock has a proposed width of 1,490 feet, measured Community Development Board — October 21, 2008 FLD2008 -08026 — Page 5 of 10 0 0 from the northern edge of the existing public fishing pier in the North Basin to the southern edge of the dock in the South Basin. The proposal includes a deviation to increase the dock width from the maximum 75 percent to 109.8 percent of the lot width. This 1,490 -foot dimension includes approximately a 55 -foot distance of blank area on the north side due to the angle of the western edge of the proposed dock with the northern edge of the existing public fishing pier, approximately a 230 -foot distance between the docks in the North and South Basins where the new Memorial Causeway Bridge is located and approximately 115 feet between the wave attenuator extension to the public fishing dock on the north side and the northern edge of the proposed dock providing for water access to the docks in the North Basin. When these other distances are taken into account, the width is 1,090 feet (representing a modest increase of approximately. 72 feet, given the size of the property). The following table depicts the development proposals consistency with the standards and criteria as per Section 3- 601.C.3.h of the Community. Development Code: 1 See Analysis for discussion of consistency /inconsistency COMPLIANCE WITH FLEXIBILITY CRITERIA: The following table depicts the consistency of the development proposal with the Flexibility criteria as per Section 2 -903.H of the Community Development Code (Marinas): Standard Proposed Consistent Inconsistent Setbacks 10% of the width of the subject North: 19 feet (to existing dock) X1 a. The north end of Clearwater. Beach; (Minimum) property (135.7 feet) South: 7.67 feet X1 Length 75% of the width of the subject 687 feet maximum from seawall X1 (Maximum) property (1,017.75 feet) f. The southern edge of Alligator Lake. Width 75% of the width of the subject 1,490 feet X1 Maximum property 1,017.75 feet designated as residential in the Zoning Atlas, unless the marina facilities are totally 1 See Analysis for discussion of consistency /inconsistency COMPLIANCE WITH FLEXIBILITY CRITERIA: The following table depicts the consistency of the development proposal with the Flexibility criteria as per Section 2 -903.H of the Community Development Code (Marinas): See Analysis for discussion or consistency /inconsistency. Community Development Board — October 21, 2008. FLD2008 -08026 —Page 6 of 10 C i Consistent Inconsistent 1. The parcel proposed for development is not located in areas identified in the X1 Comprehensive Plan as areas of environmental significance including: a. The north end of Clearwater. Beach; b.. Clearwater Harbor grass beds; c. Cooper's Point; d. Clearwater Harbor spoil islands; e. Sand Key. Park; f. The southern edge of Alligator Lake. 2. No commercial activities other than the mooring of boats on a rental basis shall be Xl permitted on any parcel of land which is contiguous to a parcel of land which is designated as residential in the Zoning Atlas, unless the marina facilities are totally screened from view from the contiguous land which is designated as residential and the hours of operation of the commercial activities are limited to the time period between sunrise and sunset. 3. The design of all buildings complies with the Downtown District design guidelines X1 in Division 5 of Article 3. 4. All marina facilities shall comply with the commercial dock requirements set forth Xl in Section 3- 601.C.3 and the marina and marina facilities requirements set forth in Section 3 -603. See Analysis for discussion or consistency /inconsistency. Community Development Board — October 21, 2008. FLD2008 -08026 —Page 6 of 10 C i 0 0 COMPLIANCE WITH FLEXIBILITY CRITERIA FOR COMMERCIAL DOCKS (SECTION 3- 601.C.3.a -M: The development proposal has been found to be consistent with the criteria for commercial docks. Specific responses to each of these criteria have been provided by the applicant and are included with their application. The individual criteria for commercial docks are set forth in the following table: Consistent ( Inconsistent 1: The proposed dock shall be subordinate to and contribute to the comfort, X1 convenience or necessities of the users or the occupants of the principal use of the property. 2. The proposed dock shall be in harmony with the scale and character of adjacent X1 properties and the neighborhood in general. 3. The proposed dock shall be compatible with dock patterns in the general vicinity. X1 4. Impacts on Existing Water Recreation Activities. The use of the proposed dock X' shall not adversely impact the health, safety or well being of persons currently using the adjacent waterways for recreational and/or commercial uses.. Furthermore, it shall not hinder or discourage the existing uses of the adjacent waterway by uses including but not limited to non - motorized boats and motorized boats. 5. Impacts on Navigation. The existence and use of the proposed dock shall not have a X1 . detrimental effect on the use of adjacent waters for navigation, transportation, recreational or other public conveniences. 6. Docks shall be sited to ensure that boat access routes avoid injury to marine X' grassbeds or other aquatic resources in the surrounding areas. 7. Docks shall not have an adverse impact upon natural marine habitats, grass flats X1 suitable as nursery. feeding grounds for marine life, or established marine soil suitable for producing plant growth of a type useful as nursery or feeding grounds for marine life; manatee sanctuaries; natural reefs and any such artificial reef which has developed an associated flora and fauna which have been determined to be approaching a typical natural assemblage structure in both density and diversity; oyster beds; clam beds; known sea turtle nesting site; commercial or sport fisheries or shell fisheries areas; and habitats desirable as juvenile fish habitat. 8. All turning basin, access channels, boat mooring areas and any other area associated X' with a dock shall have adequate circulation and existing water depths to ensure that a minimum of a one foot clearance is provided between the lowest member of a vessel (e.g. skegs, rudder, prop) and the bottom of the water body at mean or ordinary low water ( -0.95 NGVD datum). 9. The-dock shall not effectively cause erosion, extraordinary storm drainage, shoaling X1 of channels, or adversely affect the water quality presently existing in the area or limit progress that is being made toward improvement of water quality in the area in which the dock is proposed to be located. 10. The dock shall not have a material adverse impact upon the conservation of X' wildlife, marine life, and other natural resources, including beaches and shores, so as to be contrary to. the public interest. 11. The dock shall not have an adverse impact on vegetated areas; vegetative, terrestrial, X1 or aquatic habitats critical to the support of listed species providing one or more of the requirements to. sustain their existence, such as range, nesting or feeding grounds; habitats which display biological or physical attributes which would serve to make them rare within the confines of the City; designated preservation areas such as those identified in the comprehensive land use plan, national wildlife refuges, Florida outstanding waters or other designated preservation areas, and bird sanctuaries. 12. Impacts on Wetlands Habitat/Uplands. The dock shall not have a material adverse X' affect upon the uplands surrounding. 1 See Analysis for discussion of consistency /inconsistency. Community Development Board — October 21, 2008. FLD2008 -08026 — Page 7 of 10 COMPLIANCE WITH FLEXIBILITY CRITERIA FOR MARINAS AND MARINA FACILITIES (SECTION 3 -603): The development proposal has been found to be consistent with the criteria for marinas and marina facilities. Specific responses to each of these criteria have been provided by the applicant and are included with their application. The individual criteria for commercial docks are set forth in the following table: Consistent I Inconsistent 1. All proposed activities including, but not limited to, fueling, pumping -out, X' Inconsistent chartering, living- aboard, launching, dry storage and the servicing of boats, motors X' and related marine equipment shall require approval in accordance with the provisions of the zoning district in which the marina or marina facility is proposed X1 to be located. 2. For marina facilities located adjacent to residential districts, no fueling or launching X1 facilities shall be located within 20 feet of the residential property line, and no fueling or servicing of boats shall occur at such marinas after 9:00 p.m. or before X1 6:00 a.m. X1 3. No fuel storage facility or sanitary pump -out station holding tank shall be located X over water. X' 4. The marina shall pose no hazard or obstruction to navigation, as determined by the X'. city harbormaster. 5. The marina shall not adversely affect the environment, including both onshore and X1 offshore natural resources. 6. Adequate sanitary facilities shall be provided landside and a sanitary pump -out station X1 shall be provided and shall be available to manna users 24 hours a day. 7. A manatee protection plan shall be provided and appropriate speed zone signs shall X' be posted to control boat speed for manatee protection. 8. Adequate spill containment areas shall be provided on the property. X' 9. Design of the marina shall maintain existing tidal flushing and aquatic circulation X'. patterns. . 10. In the event of conflict between these standards and federal or state law or rules, the X1 federal or state law or rules shall apply to the extent that these standards have been preempted; otherwise, the more stringent regulations shall apply. 1 See Analysis for discussion of consistency /inconsistency. COMPLIANCE WITH GENERAL STANDARDS FOR LEVEL TWO APPROVALS: The following table depicts the consistency of the development proposal with the General Standards for Level Two Approvals as per Section 3 -913.A of the Community Development Code: See Analysis for discussion of consistency /inconsistency. Community Development Board — October 21, 2008 FLD2008- 08026 — Page 8 of 10 Consistent Inconsistent 1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk; X' coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage development and use of X1 adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons X' residing or working in the neighborhood. 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. X1 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the X1 immediate vicinity. 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including X' visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts on adjacent properties. See Analysis for discussion of consistency /inconsistency. Community Development Board — October 21, 2008 FLD2008- 08026 — Page 8 of 10 0 0 SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION: The Development Review Committee (DRC) reviewed the application and supporting materials at its meeting of September 4, 2008, and deemed the development proposal to be sufficient to move forward to the Community Development Board (CDB), based upon the following findings of fact and conclusions of law: Findings of Fact: 1. That the 23.96 acres is located along the Downtown Clearwater Harbor between Drew Street (north) and Pierce Street (south). The overall site is currently developed with the Coachman Park, City. Main Library, Harborview Center, Stein Mart and City Hall. The proposed marina will utilize and make . improvements to those areas of the subject property adjacent to or in Clearwater Harbor;. 2. That there currently exists a public fishing pier on the north side of the project that will remain and be expanded as part of the marina; 3. That on March 13, 2007, Clearwater voters approved a referendum providing for the construction of the proposed downtown boat slips for a maximum of 140 slips; 4. That the site has approximately 1,357 feet of waterfront frontage on Clearwater Harbor between the north and south property lines; 5. That the development proposal consists of the construction of a municipal marina consisting of a 127 -slip concrete floating dock system, with 41 slips in the North Basin and 86 slips in the South Basin; 6. That the design of the docks in both the North and South Basins accommodates maintenance vessels for the bridge and a minimum 30 -foot clearance around the bridge support columns and bases; . 7. That on the outside (west side) of the docks in both the North and South Basins adjacent to the channel, as well as the south side of the dock in the North Basin adjacent to the new Memorial Causeway Bridge, the docks accommodate the transient side tie of boats up to 25 feet in width and 100 feet in length or larger for persons traveling up and down the coast (staying for a few days or a week) or for boaters attending events or activities in Coachman Park or the downtown; 8. That boats moored at these transient side ties will be sufficiently set back from the centerline of the channel of the. Intracoastal Waterway so as to not impact the safety or navigation of boats in the channel or at the side ties; 9. That the outside. (west side) of the docks, as well as the ends of docks, is designed as wave attenuators to reduce wave impacts on boats moored in the slips; 10. That the. existing building on the north end at Drew Street will be renovated and expanded toward the south to provide for a harbor master's office, as well as providing restrooms, showers and laundry facilities for persons using the docks in the existing portion of the structure; 11. That based on a parking ratio of one parking space per two slips and 127 proposed slips, a total of 64 parking spaces are required for this marina;. 12. That two existing parking lots that will be upgraded to provide parking for the marina.. The northern parking lot will have 20 parking spaces, while the southern parking lot will have 46 parking spaces. An additional 59 on- street parking spaces along Cleveland Street and Drew Street proximate to the marina will also be upgraded as part of this project; 13. That there are no properties zoned residentially adjacent to the proposed dock (adjacent properties are zoned Downtown District); 14. That the proposed dock meets the required length criteria of the Code; 15. That the proposal includes a deviation to. reduce the side (north) setback from 135.7 to 19 feet and to reduce the side (south) setback from 135.7 to 7.67 feet; 16. That the proposal includes a deviation to increase the maximum width from 75% of the lot width (1,017.7 feet) to 109.8% of the lot width (1,490 feet); Community Development Board — October 21, 2008 FLD2008 -08026 —Page 9 of 10. 0 0 17. That water depths beneath the proposed boat slips range from approximately five feet to approximately 16 feet, providing more than the one -foot clearance distance between the bottom of the vessel and the bottom of the water body at mean low tide; and 18. That there are no outstanding Code Enforcement issues associated with the subject property.. Conclusions of Law: 1. That on March 13, 2007, Clearwater voters approved a referendum providing for the construction of the proposed downtown boat slips for a maximum of 140 slips;. 2. That the development proposal is consistent with the Flexibility. criteria as per Section 2 -903.H of the Community Development Code (Marinas); 3. That the development proposal is consistent with the commercial dock review criteria as per Section 3- 601.C.3 of the Community. Development Code;. 4. That the development proposal is consistent with the marina review criteria as per Section 3 -603 of the Community Development Code; and 5. That the development proposal is consistent with the General Applicability criteria as per Section 3- 913.A of the Community. Development Code. Based upon the above, the Planning Department recommends APPROVAL of the Flexible Development application to permit a marina for 127 slips in the Downtown (D) District with a reduction to the side (north) setback from 135.7 to 19 feet, a reduction to the side (south) setback from 135.7 to 7.67 feet and an increase to the maximum width from 75% of the lot width (1,017.7 feet) to 109.8% of the lot width (1,490 feet), under the provisions of Sections 2- 903.H, 3- 601.C.3 and 3 -603, with the following conditions: Conditions of Approval: 1. That living aboard non - transient vessels be prohibited, except as may be allowed for private tenants under the Private Docking Permit;. 2. That there be no fueling facilities at this marina; 3. That no private tenants conduct any commercial business from any slip at this marina; 4. That ferry service may be permitted, with written prior permission from the City Manager or designee, to allow commercial vessels with a base operation in another location other than this marina to pick up and/or drop off customers at this marina; 5. That major servicing of vessels be prohibited, but permissible servicing of vessels be limited to routine maintenance and minor repairs necessary for the preservation and seaworthiness of the vessel, as determined by the Harbor Master; 6. That signage be permanently installed on the docks or at the entrance to the docks containing wording warning boaters of the existence. of protected sea grasses and manatees in the vicinity; 7. That a copy of the SWFWMD and/or FDEP Permit and Corps of Engineer's Permit, if applicable, be submitted to the Planning Department prior to commencement of construction; and 8. That, prior to the issuance of any permit, compliance with all requirements of General Engineering, Traffic Engineering and Stormwater Engineering be met; and 9. That the Public Art and Design Impact Fee be due on this project, pending transfer of impact fee funds. Prepared by Planning Department Staff Wayne M. Ifells, AICP, Planner III ATTACHMENTS: * Location Map * Aerial Map * Zoning Map * Existing Surrounding Uses Map * Photographs of Site and Vicinity S. IPlanning DepartmentlCD BIFLEX (FLD)IPending caseslUp for the next CDBIDrew 0210 City Downtown Boat Docks.Marina (D) - 10.11.08 CDB - WWIDrew 0210 Staff Report.doc Community Development Board — October 21, 2008 FLD2008 -08026 — Page 10 of 10 0 0 Lu GE ORGIA d 1, HART ST PROJECT SITE .PONES D > tr F w DREW ST a zE 1 tY ii 1 1 wo HENDRICK LAURA � LAURA U 1 1 0 E7 CD � z PARK xE, w= � PIERCE ST COURT FRA N KUN � ST w a T E _ �y W SR -60 MA RKLEY COURT ST CHESTNUT ST --G- SR -60 ROGERS ST LOCATION MAP Owner: City of Clearwater Case: FLD2008 -08026 Site: 210 Drew Street Property Size(Acres): 23.96 16/29/15/00000/210 16/29/15/00000/210 /0110 /0100 PIN: 16/29/15/43956/000 16/29/15/76482/002 /0010 /0010 16/29/15/20358/001 /0040 Atlas Page: 286A & 286B 0 0 Owner: Site: AERIAL MAP City of Clearwater 210 Drew Street Case: I FLD2008 -08026 Property 23.96 Size(Acres): 16/29/15/00000/210 /0110 16/29/15/00000/210 /0100 PIN: 16/29/15/43956/000 /0010 16/29/15/76482/002 /0010 16/29/15/20358/001 /0040 Atlas Page: 286A & 286B • • a - j L 37890 1 I zoo L° L2 I A � 3 L 1 z w DREW, 8z 8 Sv4SI 8 �vygs 8 ,a P �dY � 38 >n,t L sss J 1 t / B -8 878 1 q 4 I 5 1 15 ® I ® 1 0 I 4 I I 7 - r ` 10 --� 1 urn I 1 57996 V ' IB 5 4 3 1 1 2 W' — —B 23 14 15 f 3 — a A to 21 30 t� 4 r- B 12 19 �4�o3se — —11 MY to 1B _11 L_!823 J — — 14 7 — t] 5 15 16 m B o a s s 6 p X82131 ~ 210 ZONING MAP Owner: City of Clearwater Case: FLD2008 -08026 Site: 210 Drew Street Property 23.96 Size(Acres): 16/29/15/00000/210 /0110 16/29/15/00000/210 /0100 PIN: 16/29/15/43956/000 /0010 16/29/15/76482/002 /0010 16/29/15/20358/001 /0040 Atlas Page: 286A & 2866 L� Overnight J/890 We n_ t accommodations 200 I ; Drew St View looking W at existing public fishing pier in north boat slip basin View looking NW at north boat slip basin from north parking lot 210 Drew Street FLD2008 -08026 View looking W at future harbor master building at Drew St (Coachman Park on left) View looking NW at north parking lot adjacent to Drew St and north boat slip basin View looking S at north boat slip basin (Memorial Causeway Bridge & Pierce 100 condos in background) Sheet 1 of 3 construction at 100 Drew St (adjacent to bridge) View looking W at south boat slip basin from south View looking N at south parking lot from Pierce St 210 Drew Street View looking S at south parking lot under Memoria View looking NW at south boat slip basin from View looking E at parking lot W of City Hall adjacent to subject property FLD2008- 08026 Sheet 2 of 3 View looking S at Pierce 100 condominiums View looking E from Drew St at Harborview Center and Stein Mart View looking SE from Drew St at Coachman Park adjacent to subject property 210 Drew Street View looking E from intersection of Drew St and Cleveland St at downtown development View looking E from Drew St at Main City Library View looking N from Drew St at Sandcastle facility adjacent to N side of subject property FLD2008 -08026 Sheet 3 of 3 Engineering Condition konditions Associated With FLD2008 -08026 210 DREW ST Steve Doherty 562 -4773 08/25/2008 General Note: DRC review is a prerequisite for Building'Permit Review; additional comments may Not Met be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. Environment7No ondition Sarah Josuns 562 -4897 08/21/2008 issues. Not Met Fire Condition Leonard Rickard 562 -4327 x3078 09/16/2008 No Issues Not Met Harbor Master Condition . Wayne Wells, AICP 727- 562 -4504 08/26/2008 8/26/08 - Per Bill Morris - Not Met I and my staff have reviewed this and the only thing we could find is not on a numbered page but near the front of the application Under Flexible Development Application Applicant Reponses. I am not sure if they are material to the application in that it concerns the Job classification we say we will put in the office on site and that has not been decided yet. Section D. Written Submittal requirements (Code Section 3 -19.A) Subparagraph 6. Where it speaks to Hours of Operation. It is worded that: " The Downtown Boat Slips will be staffed 24 hours a day, Seven Days a week. The staffing will consist of a Dock Master office Staff manned by a Marine Trades worker from 6:30 Am until 9 PM and a police Aide Security Guard from 9 PM until 6:30 AM the next morning." It should read: " The Downtown Boat Slips will be staffed 24 hours a day, Seven Days a week. The staffing will consist of a Dock Master office Staff from 6:30 Am until 9 PM and a police Aide Security Guard from 9 PM until 6:30 AM the next morning." similarly further down in the same section the last paragraph in Section 6 Says the office; " will be staffed with a Marine Facility Operator " and it should just say: " will be staffed with Marine Department personnel " and in the last line of that same paragraph the words: " Marine Facility Operator " Should be: " Marine Department staff " Parks & Recs C ndition Debbie Reid 562 -4818 08/20/2008 No issues in regards to P &R impact fees - City project. Not Met 08/20/2008 The Public Art and Design Impact Fee is due on this project, pending transfer of impact fee funds. Not Met Print Date: 10/06/2008 CaseConditons Page 1 of 5 • FLD2008 -08026 210 DREW ST Parks & Rees Condition Chris Hubbard Please contact Chris Hubbard with any questions 562 -4837. 9 Storm Water Condition Phuong Vo 562 -4752 08/21/2008 The following shall be addressed prior to issuance of the Building Permit: 1. Sheet C -15: Provide invert elevations and slope of the proposed 18" RCP. 2. Sheet C -15: Provide a detail `of the proposed gutter grate. Please show the connection of this grate with the adjacent structure and /or pavement in a larger scale. 3. Sheet C -17: Provide a detail of proposed inlet type C. 4. Sheet C -17: Provide invert elevations and slope of the proposed 15" RCPs 5. Sheet C -17: What type of manhole is proposed on the existing pipe? Will it be a doghouse type? Provide a detail of this proposed manhole. General note: 1. DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. Traffic Eng Condition Bennett Elbo. 562 -4775 08/18/2008 The City's parallel parking dimensions are measured 8' wide by 23' long. If the parallel parking spaces along Cleveland Street and Drew Street are striped to 23' in length then the applicant can aqcuire more public parking spaces. 2. Describe where and how boats will be unloaded and loaded with a boat trailer? The above to be addressed prior to a Community Development Board (CDB) hearing. The following to be addressed prior to a Building Permit: 1. On page D -1 of the detail page see handicap parking sign, change the Florida Statute number to read "F.S. 318.18 ". 2. Add to the projects detail sheet the F.D.O.T.'s truncated dome detail (Index 304 page 6 of 6). See link provided: http: / /www. dot. state. fl .us /rddesign /rd /RTDS /08 /304.pdf General Note(s): 1) Applicant shall comply with the current Transportation Impact Fee Ordinance and fee schedule and paid prior to a Certificate of Occupancy (C.O.). 2) DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. Zoning Condition Wayne Wells, AICP 727 - 562 -4504 Not Met Not Met 08/27/2008 Description of Request on Page 1 of the application needs to include all setback reductions (north Not Met and south) and width increase. The reduction to the required setback should be written "a reduction to the side (south) setback from 197 to 43 feet ". Additionally, there should be a reduction to the side (north) setback as the existing dock, nor the proposed extension, does not appear to be 197 feet from the north property line extended. Finally, there may be a dock width increase, because we need to look at the TOTAL width of the docks (existing and proposed) from the north "end" to the south "end ", including the Memorial Bridge Causeway area (not an addition of 535'+ 5031. See other comments about dimensioning. 08/27/2008 Responses to Section 3- 601.C.3.h.i) - Need to also deal with any setback reduction on the north Not Met side. For both the north and south side setback reductions, need to provide justification for such reductions. 08/27/2008 Responses to Section 3- 601.C.3.e.i) - Part of the criteria was left out when typed (add in). Also, Not Met the response in the last paragraph needs to address the one -foot minimum clearance distance between the bottom of the vessel and the bottom of the water body at mean or ordinary low water. Print Date: 10/06/2008 Page 2 of 5 CaseConditons FLD2008 -08026 210 DREW ST Zoning Condition Wayne Wells, AICP 727 - 562 -4504 08/27/2008 Responses to Section 3- 601.C.3.c - There is no plan that shows where the channel of the Not Met Intracoastal Waterway is located, especially in proximity to the proposed marina. Include such. 08/27/2008 Sheets C -18, C -19 and C -20 - Code requires interior landscaping at a rate of 10% of the vehicular Not Met use area of these two parking lots, with one shade tree per 150 square feet of interior landscape area (two accent trees = one shade tree, planted relatively close to each other; three palms = one shade tree, planted in a cluster of three). Revise to provide the required number of trees. 08/27/2008 Sheet C -13 - It was previously recommended to install a flagpole in front of the harbormaster Not Met building. If to be provided, need to show location on this sheet (need to also indicate proposed height of flagpole). 08/27/2008 Responses to Section 3- 601.C.3.a.ii) - The response needs to comment only on the docks and Not Met not the dockmaster building or other upland improvements. It is important to note in the response that this is a publicly -owned marina, which may not be consistent with docks on adjacent properties, but is also as generally approved by the voters in 2007. 08/27/2008 Project Description - The first paragraph mentions a "ferry landing ", but there is no plan that Not Met shows where that is to occur. Indicate such on plans. Additionally, suggest expanding the written material to discuss what is meant by a "ferry landing ", including where such a ferry might operate between other location(s), where such a ferry might dock (it probably won't operate 24 hours a day, so that it will ,be docked someplace just like any other boat), the operational characteristics of such a ferry, the positives and negatives for having such a ferry landing, how it relates to upland,. improvements (including the dropoff area and parking), etc. 08/27/2008 City of Clearwater Land Ownership - This paragraph describes what submerged land the City Not Met owns. Can there be submitted a map showing what the City owns (even if 8.5 "x11" in size) with an indication (generally) where a lease will be necessary from the State? 08/27/2008 Responses to Section 3- 601.C.3.b - Need to include how the design of the docks will not inhibit Not Met boat traffic within the channel of the Inracoastal Waterway and how the dock design will provide a defined location for transient slips for events at Coachman Park. 08/27/2008 Sheet D -6 - Move to be Sheet C -22. Not Met 08/27/2008 Responses to Section 3- 601.C.3.d.i) - The slip layout plan by Misener has been referenced as to Not Met the location of sea grass beds. However, the shading of such beds is not called out as "sea grass beds" so that it is clear as to what the shading depicts. In the South Basin, what will prevent boaters from traveling eastward closer to the seawall, and into the sea grass bed, east of Dock D? Will there be any signs restricting access to this eastern area? 08/27/2008 Response to General Applicability criteria #6 - The response refers to "the public docks ". Am Not Met unclear where such "public docks" are located, as the Misener Marine plan does not indicate where the "public docks" are. Expand the written material in this criteria response and provide a plan as to where such "public docks" are located. 08/27/2008 Sheets C -2, C -5, C -6, C -9, C -10, C -13, C -14, C -17, C -18, C -21, E -1 & E -4 - Show property lines Not Met (there is private property to the west and to the north). 08/27/2008 Responses to Section 3- 601.C.3.h.ii) - Need to also indicate that the length of the docks is Not Met restricted by the channel of the Intracoastal Waterway. 08/27/2008 Responses to Section 3- 601.C.3.h.iii) - See other comments needing dimensions on plans Not Met showing the waterfront width (indicated as 1,970 feet in width). Width of the dock must be measured from the northernmost tip of the existing fishing pier (closest to the seawall) in the North Basin to the southernmost tip of the wave attenuator on the south side of Dock A in the South Basin. You cannot take out for the Memorial Causeway Bridge. It appears that the width will Print Date: 10/06/2008 Page 3 of 5 CaseConditons FLD2008 -08026 210 DREW ST Zoning Condition Wayne Wells, AICP 727- 562 -4504 exceed the 75% rule. Will need to determine the actual width, include such in the request and provide justification for such increase in width. 08/27/2008 Response to General Applicability criteria #5 - In the 4th line, change "compliment" to Not Met "complement ". 08/27/2008 Response to General Applicability criteria #2 - The boat slip project is also abutts the Scientology Not Met property on the north side of Drew Street. Revise response to include this adjacent property. 08/27/2008 Response to Section 3 -603.1 - Need to provide a response, beyond that other agencies approval Not Met processes will require demonstrate adequate tidal flushing and aquatic circulation patterns. 08/27/2008 Response to Section 3 -603.F - Did not address "adequate sanitary facilities" landside (at the dock Not Met master building). 08/27/2008 Need to complete the Affidavit to Authorize Agent (page 7 of the application) by including the Not Met appropriate information in Sections 1, 2,3 and 4. 08/27/2008 Dock master building - There needs to be a discussion in the application material as to what Not Met functions will occur at this building (dock master offices, laundry, restroom and showers). Need to discuss (possibly if floor plans are available [existing versus proposed] to assist visually) the existing building, how it has been used, how it will be renovated and expanded and how it will function. 08/27/2008 Sheet C -10 - Wheel stops are required for the eastern parking spaces in the southern,;parking lot Not Met (Section 3- 1204.D). Because the western parking spaces are flush with the sidewalk, it is highly recommended to install wheel stops to prevent vehicle encroaching the sidewalk and traveling into the water (same comment is applicable to the parking spaces on the west side of the northern parking lot on Sheets C -11 and C -12). 08/27/2008 Sheets C -2, C-4, C -5, C -6, C -8 & C -9 - Remove proposed boat slips from the "Existing Site Plan" Not Met and "Demolition Plan" sheets. 08/27/2008 Sheet C -11 - Dimension the width of the sidewalk west of the northern parking lot. Not Met 08/27/2008 Sheet C -11 - Dimension the width of the landscape area between the northern parking lot and Not Met street curb for parallel parking spaces. 08/27/2008 Sheet C -11 - Parking spaces have been dimensioned as nine -feet wide typically with an overall Not Met dimension of 36'. It was previously recommended to make the landscape island on the south side of the handicap parking space 0.9 feet larger. Instead, the HC space has been widened to 13 feet. Reduce the HC space to 12 feet and convert the 0.9 or 1 -foot to landscaping as previoiusly requested. 08/27/2008 Sheets C -11 & C -12 - It appears that the concrete curb proposed on the west side of the parking Not Met spaces in the northern parking lot on the 90% plans has been removed. As such, it appears, based on the ME indicated on Sheets C -15 and C -16, that there should be no need for a handicap ramp for the handicap space in the western sidewalk. 08/27/2008 Sheet C -12 - Indicate the width of the sidewalk along the seawall. Not Met 08/27/2008 Sheet C -12 - Indicate the width of the driveway into the northern parking lot. Not Met 08/27/2008 Response to Section 3 -603.0 - Response appears inconsistent with that in the Response to Not Met Section 3- 603.A, where sewerage pump out is proposed. Need to expound and clarify. 08/27/2008 Response to Section 3 -603.6 - Need to address all aspects of the criteria (only fueling Not Met addressed). Additionally, the proposed marina is not adjacent to residentially zoned property. 08/27/2007 Sheets C -18 and C -19 - Fire truck access from north end of southern parking lot to Cleveland Not Met Street - How will the fire truck driver know the location of the geoweb so as to stay on the access Print Date: 10/06/2008 CaseConditons Page 4 of 5 • FLD2008 -08026 210 DREW ST C] Zoning Condition Wayne Wells, AICP 727 - 562 -4504 area? Will it be outlined somehow so the driver knows the path? Is the sidewalk along Cleveland Street being designed to withstand the weight of the fire truck? 08/27/2008 Sheets C -19 and C -20 - Landscape islands in the northern parking lot are large enough for shade Not Met trees to be planted. Alternately, two accent trees or three palms are required in the islands. 08/27/2008 The first page of the application indicates the following parcel numbers are involved with this Not Met application: 16- 29 -15- 00000 - 210 -0110; 16- 29 -15- 00000 - 210 -0100; 16- 29 -15- 43956- 000 -0010; 16- 29 -15- 76482 - 002 -0010; and 16- 29 -15- 20358 - 001 -0040. After cross - referencing with the Pinellas County Property Appraiser's office, it does not appear that these are all of the parcel numbers for property involved with this project. For advertising purposes, I need to ensure all affect parcel numbers are listed on the application. Please check with the Property Appraiser's office for all affected parcels. I have a map that indicates the properties listed above by parcel number that you may have to assist in determining all affected parcel numbers. 08/27/2008 Sheet D -6 (should be C -22) - Revise the Landscape Schedule for the following: Not Met a. Indicate for the LI, 1_12 and LJ that they must be a minimum of 2" caliper at time of planting; and b. Indicate there must be a rain sensor for the irrigation system. 08/27/2008 To be clear, is the electric service for the bollard lights and the parking lot lights for the southern Not Met parking lot being placed underground? 08/27/2008 Need a detail for the compactor dumpster enclosure. Unclear how one gets into the dumpster Not Met enclosure to dump the trash. Unclear of the exterior material and color of the dumpster enclosure, including the gates. 08/27/2008 Response to Section 3 -603.A - Response states that sewerage pump out facilities will be Not Met provided. Unclear if this is a change from prior Committee meetings, as I do not recollect such facility to be provided. If to be provided, show where such will occur and the operational aspects, of such. 08/27/2008 Responses to Section 3- 601.C.3.i - This is a publicly owned facility. Need to provide a response. Not Met 08/27/2008 Site Plans need to show the following: Not Met a. City property lines on the north and south; b. A dimension as to the property width (it has been indicated as 1,970 feet but I have no drawings that show such dimension); c. The property lines (see "a" above) need to be extended into the water; d. Setback dimensions need to be indicated from the property lines (north and south) to the closest part of the docks (existing and proposed) on the north and south. On the north side there is the existing fishing pier that is included as part of the "dock" and there is an extension of such that also includes the floating dock that keeps boats out of the seagrass area; e. A dimension as to the dock width (that dimension between the setbacks requested); f. A dimension as to the dock length (it has been indicated as 675 feet, but I have no drawings that show such dimension); and g. A dimension showing the width of the waterway that the docks are being located within (response to Section 3- 601.C.3.h.ii refers to 75% of the waterway width being 1,477 feet, but it is 75% of what dimension ?). Print Date: 10 /06/2008 Page 5 of 5 CaseConditons 0 0 Wells, Wayne From: Watkins, Sherry Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2008 11:24 AM To: Planning Subject: FW: CDB Resubmittals for the October 21, 2008 meeting FYI - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Keller, James Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2008 9:37 AM To: Watkins, Sherry Subject: RE: CDB Resubmittals for the October 21, 2008 meeting Ms. Watkins, This should take care of the fire department on all of the resubmittals. Should you need any further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact this office. Respectfully, James Keller Fire Inspector II Division of Fire Prevention Services Clearwater Fire & Rescue - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Watkins, Sherry Sent: Monday, September 15, 2008 4:12 PM To: Albee, Rick; Buzzell, William; Clayton, Gina; Delk, Michael; Doherty, Stever Elbo, Bennett; Glenn, Tom; Gluski, Roberta; Kader, Art; Keller, James; Kurleman, Scott; Lee, Catherine; O'Neill, Shane; Porter, Catherine; Reid, Debbie; Rice, Scott; Rickard, Leonard; Tefft, Robert; Watkins, Sherry; Wells, Wayne Subject: CDB Resubmittals for the October 21, 2008 meeting Importance: High DRC Members, Plans. for the following cases have been resubmitted for the October 21, 2008 CDB meeting: FLD2008 -08024 & DVA2008 -00001 430 S Gulfview Blvd Planner: Wayne Wells [Keller, James] Done, JFK FLD2008 -08025 1160 Mandalay Point Road Planner Scott Kurleman FLD2008 -08026 210 Drew Street Planner: Wayne Wells FLD2008 -05013 100 Coronado Dr Planner Wayne Wells I have placed one copy of the case resubmittal package on the cabinets outside of Room 216 in our office for your review (please do not take it, as we need it for CDB mail out). Please review your comments /conditions for this case in Permit Plan and determine if they are met. Whether the conditions are "met" or still "not met," please affirm to me via email. Please have cases reviewed, if possible by 12:pm on, Friday, September 19, 2008. Sherry Watkins Administrative Analyst Planning Department 727 -562 -4582 • Wells, Wayne • From: Watkins, Sherry Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2008 11:25 AM To: Planning Subject: FW: CDB Resubmittals for the October 21, 2008 meeting FYI - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Reid, Debbie Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2008 10:57 AM To: Watkins, Sherry Subject: RE: CDB Resubmittals for the October 21, 2008 meeting See below comments... - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Watkins, Sherry Sent: Monday, September 15, 2008 4:12 PM To: Albee, Rick; Buzzell, William; Clayton, Gina; Delk, Michael; Doherty, Steve; Elbo, Bennett; Glenn, Tom; Gluski, Roberta; Kader, Art; Keller, James; Kurleman, Scott; Lee, Catherine; O'Neill, Shane; Porter, Catherine; Reid, Debbie; Rice, Scott; Rickard, Leonard; Tefft, Robert; Watkins, Sherry; Wells, Wayne Subject: CDB Resubmittals for the October 21, 2008 meeting Importance: High DRC Members, Plans for the following cases have been resubmitted for the October 21, 2008 CDB meeting: FLD2008 -08024 & DVA2008- 00001430 S Gulfview Blvd Planner: Wayne Wells [Reid, Debbie] Impact fees still due prior to building permit or plat. FLD2008 -08025 1160 Mandalay Point Road Planner Scott Kurleman [Reid, Debbie] No issues. FLD2008 -08026 210. Drew Street Planner: Wayne Wells [Reid, Debbie] No issues. FLD2008 -05013 100 Coronado Dr Planner Wayne Wells [Reid, Debbie] Site data table has been corrected. Impact fees due prior to building permit or plat. I have placed one copy of the case resubmittal package on the cabinets outside of Room 216 in our office for your review (please do not take it, as we need it for CDB mail out). Please review your comments /conditions for this case in Permit Plan and determine if they are met. Whether the. conditions are "met" or still "not met," please affirm to me via email. Please have cases reviewed, if possible by 12:pm on, Friday, September 19, 2008. Sherry Watkins Administrative Analyst Planning Department 727 - 562 -4582 0 0 Wells, Wayne From: Watkins, Sherry Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2008 1:43 PM To: Planning Subject: FW: CDB Resubmittals. for the October 21, 2008 meeting Importance: High - - - -- Original Message - - - -- From: Hubbard, Christopher Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2008 10:35 AM To: Watkins, Sherry Cc: Reid, Debbie Subject: FW: CDB Resubmittals for the October 21, 2008 meeting Importance: High Sherry, Here are the determinations for Public Art: FLD2008 -08024 & DVA2008 -00001 430 S Gulfview Blvd Planner: Wayne Wells (Not Met) FLD2008 -08025 1160 Mandalay Point Road Planner Scott Kurleman (Exempt) FLD2008 -08026 210 Drew Street Planner: Wayne Wells (Not Met) FLD2008 -05013 100 Coronado Dr Planner Wayne. Wells (Not Met) Thank you, Chris - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Reid, Debbie Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2008 9:48 AM To: Hubbard, Christopher Subject: FW: CDB Resubmittals for the October 21, 2008 meeting Importance: High Chris, normally don't forward these along to you, but a couple of these cases have public art due. - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Watkins, Sherry Sent: Monday, September 15, 2008 4:12 PM To: Albee, Rick; Buzzell, William; Clayton, Gina; Delk, Michael; Doherty, Steve; Elbo, Bennett; Glenn, Tom; Gluski, Roberta; Kader, Art; Keller, James; Kurleman, Scott; Lee, Catherine; O'Neill, Shane; Porter, Catherine; Reid, Debbie; Rice, Scott; Rickard, Leonard; Tefft, Robert; Watkins, Sherry; Wells, Wayne Subject: CDB Resubmittals for the October 21, 2008 meeting Importance: High DRC Members, Plans for the following cases have been resubmitted for the October 21, 2008 CDB meeting: FLD2008 -08024 & DVA2008 -00001 430 S Gulfview Blvd Planner: Wayne Wells FLD2008 -08025 1160 Mandalay Point Road Planner Scott Kurleman FLD2008 -08026 210 Drew Street Planner: Wayne Wells FLD2008 -05013 100 Coronado Dr Planner Wayne Wells I have placed one copy of the case resubmittal package on the cabinets outside of Room 216 in our office for your review (please do not take it, as we need it for CDB mail out). Please review your comments /conditions for this case in Permit Plan. and determine if they are met. Whether the conditions are "met" or still "not met," please affirm to me via email. Please have cases reviewed, if possible by 12:pm on, Friday, September 19, 2008. 0 0 Wells,. Wayne From: Albee, Rick Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2008 2:04 PM To: Watkins, Sherry; Planning Subject: RE: CDB Resubmittals for the October 21, 2008 meeting 430 Gulfview- No Issue 11601VIandalay Point -Even though the renounce letter states that I had no issue there is a Building Permit condition. 210 Drew -No Issue 100 Coronado -No Issue - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Watkins, Sherry Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2008 11:24 AM To: Planning Subject: FW: CDB Resubmittals for the October 21, 2008 meeting FYI - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Keller, James Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2008 9:37 AM To: Watkins, Sherry Subject: RE: CDB Resubmittals for the October 21, 2008 meeting Ms. Watkins, This should take care of the fire department on all of the resubmittals. Should you need any further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact this office. Respectfully, James Keller Fire Inspector II Division of Fire Prevention Services + :leaRvater Firo R Rncri to - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Watkins, Sherry Sent: Monday, September 15, 2008 4:12 PM To: Albee, Rick; Buzzell, William; Clayton, Gina; Delk, Michael; Doherty, Steve; Elbo, Bennett; Glenn, Tom; Gluski, Roberta; Kader, Art; Keller, James; Kurleman, Scott; Lee, Catherine; O'Neill, Shane; Porter, Catherine; Reid, Debbie; Rice, Scott; Rickard, Leonard; Tefft, Robert; Watkins, Sherry; Wells, Wayne Subject: CDB Resubmittals for the October 21, 2008 meeting Importance: High DRC Members, Plans for the following cases have been resubmitted for the October 21, 2008 CDB meeting: FLD2008 -08024 & DVA2008 -00001 430 S Gulfview Blvd Planner: Wayne Wells [Keller, James] Done, JFK FLD2008 -08025 1160 Mandalay Point Road Planner Scott Kurleman FLD2008 -08026 210 Drew Street Planner: Wayne Wells FLD2068 -05013 100 Coronado Dr Planner Wayne Wells I have placed one copy of the case resubmittal package on the cabinets outside of Room 216 in our office for your review (please do not take it, as we need it for CDB mail out). Please review your comments /conditions for this case in Permit Plan and determine if they are met. Whether the conditions are "met' or still "not met," please affirm to me via email. Please have cases reviewed, if possible by 12:pm on, Friday, September 19, 2008. Sherry Watkins Administrative Analyst Wells, Wayne From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Met: FLD2008 -08024 O.K. to proceed. FLD2008 -08025 O.K. to proceed FLD2008 -08026 O.K. to proceed. FLD2008 -05013 O.K. to proceed. Doherty, Steve Friday, September 19, 2008 3:48 PM Watkins, Sherry Quillen, Michael; Rice, Scott; Wells, Wayne; Tefft, Robert; Kurleman, Scott RE: CDB Resubmittals for the October 21, 2008 meeting 430 S Gulfview Blvd 1160 Mandalay Point Road 210 Drew Street 100 Coronado Dr Planner: Wayne Wells Planner Scott Kurleman Planner: Wayne Wells Planner Wayne Wells Note: A single condition will be completed that will address Traffic Engineering and Parking System concerns with the adequacy of the parking proposed. DVA2008 -00001 100 Coronado Dr Planner Wayne Wells O.K. to proceed. Per Scott Rice, there are some minor issues that have not been resolved. The following Engineering comment was placed in Tidemark and the conditions left as Not "ITEM 5.04.4. REFERS TO EXHIBIT O AS THE PARKING PROTOCOL. THE PARKING PROTOCOL IS EXHIBIT M. COMMENTS 21, 22 AND 23 ARE NOT ADDRESSED." Ste-hen L. Dohel ty Engineering Specialist I City of Clearwater Engineering steve.doherty@myclearwater.com 727.562.4773 - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Watkins, Sherry Sent: Monday, September 15, 2008 4:12 PM To: Albee, Rick; Buzzell, William; Clayton, Gina; Delk, Michael; Doherty, Steve; Elbo, Bennett; Glenn, Tom; Gluski, Roberta; Kader, Art; Keller, James; Kurleman, Scott; Lee, Catherine; O'Neill, Shane; Porter, Catherine; Reid, Debbie; Rice, Scott; Rickard, Leonard; Tefft, Robert; Watkins, Sherry; Wells, Wayne Subject: CDB Resubmittals for the October 21, 2008 meeting Importance: High DRC Members, Plans for the following cases have been resubmitted for the October 21, 2008 CDB meeting: FLD2008 -08024 & DVA2008- 00001430 S Gulfview Blvd Planner: Wayne Wells FLD2008 -08025 1160 Mandalay Point Road Planner Scott Kurleman FLD2008 -08026 210 Drew Street Planner: Wayne Wells FLD2008 -05013 100 Coronado Dr Planner Wayne Wells I have placed one copy of the case resubmittal package on the cabinets outside of Room 216 in our office for your review (please do not take it, as we need it for CDB mail out). Please review your comments /conditions for this case in Permit Plan and determine if they are met. Whether the conditions are "met" or still "not met," please affirm to me via email. Please have cases reviewed, if possible by 12:pm on, Friday, September 19, 2008. • Wells, Wayne From: Fresk, Sheryl Sent: Wednesday, October 01, 2008 2:06 PM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: RE: Map Request for FLD2008- 08026, 210 Drew Street fi ®� � I AERIAL.doc EXISTING.doc LOCATION.do ZONING.doc - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Wednesday, October 01, 2008 1:52 PM To: Fresk, Sheryl Cc: Herman, Jason Subject: Map Request for FLD2008- 08026, 210 Drew Street Sheryl - My bad -'I forgot to attach the map request for Case FLD2008 -08026 for the property at 210 Drew Street when I sent the email to you on September 17th. It is now attached. You already have the paperwork for this application. Thanks- Wayne M. Wells, AICP Planner III City of Clearwater 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, FL 33756 -5520 Phone: 727 - 562 -4504 Fax: 727 - 562 -4865 << File: FLD Map request form.doc >> 0 9 Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Wednesday, October 01, 2008 1:52 PM To: Fresk, Sheryl Cc: Herman, Jason Subject: Map Request for FLD2008- 08026, 210 Drew Street Sheryl - My bad - I forgot to attach the map request for Case FLD2008 -08026 for the property at 210 Drew Street when I sent the email to you on September 17th. It is now attached. You already have the paperwork for this application. Thanks- Wayne M. Wells, AICP Planner III City of Clearwater 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, - FL 33756 -5520 Phone: 727 - 562 -4504 Fax: 727 - 562 -4865 FLD Map equest form.doc 0 . 0 Wells, Wayne From: Wells,: Wayne Sent: Wednesday,. September 17, 2008.3:54 AM To: Fresk, Sheryl Cc: Herman, Jason; Watkins, Sherry; Tefft, Robert Subject: Map. Request for FLD2008- 08026, 210 Drew. Street Sheryl - Attached is a map request for Case FLD2008 -08026 for the property at 210 Drew Street.. I will bring over the paperwork. This is. a City project and I have no survey. Please see Ed Chesney and Tom. Mahony for the area covered by this application. Thanks- Wayne M. Wells, A/CP Planner III City of Clearwater 100 South. Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, FL. 33756 -5520 Phone:. 727 - 562 -4504 Fax: 727 - 562 -4865 9 9 Flexible Development Application - Map Request Planner Name: Wayne Wells Case Number: FLD2008 -08026 Date Requested: September 17, 2008 Date Requested for (date): September 29, 2008 Maps Requested X❑ Location Map X❑ Aerial Map X❑ Zoning Map X❑ Existing Surrounding Uses Map Required. Documents to be submitted. to Engineering X❑ Legal Description X❑ Survey X❑ Map with Proposed Site Highlighted Map Name Owner: City of Clearwater Case: FLD2008 -08026 Site: 210 Drew Street Property Size (Acres): 23.96 16/29/15/00000/210 /0110 16/29/15/00000/210 /0100 PIN: 16/29/15/43956/000 /0010 16/29/15/76482/002 /0010 16/29/15/20358/001 /0040 Atlas Page: 286A & 286B PLD 2..AIDJI • 6 A b2..L 0 Drams, S4�7ik &A4 2768 :277A 2778 0 rwater PREPARED BY PUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATION z G INEERINGIGIS 00S.MyEN We Ave., learwater, FL 33756 Ph.: (727)5623750, Fax: (727)526-4755 wwwmycleamatur.com w. Cry ac,—,Pw� E 0 20. 00 11ft14 ye R �CX D—C. P City Owned Property Co Agreement to Annex co Legend SUB NUMBER (-- Refer loPl,t) 0 LOCK NUMBER SUB PARCEL NUMBER PARCEL.U...It I-III " "' ^:• LANO HOOK (COMMON OWNERSHIP) PLATTED SUBDIVISION BOUNDARY COUNTY HIGHWAY Or q1' STATE HIGHWAY G3U.S. HIGHWAY Outside City of Clearwater Zoning Atlas Aug 31, 2005 .. ...... NW 114 of 16-29-15 286A 295A 2958 • FA ©r � aa� � � J I f0/ Z10 j Foot -T,dr,Ye1 ed DT I - i: - � # City Owned Property w r1 00 ..... . ...... _j ........ .. ... 278A - H.1_4 L 0 PREPARED BY PUBUC WORKS ADMINISTRATION ENGINEERING I GIS Myrtle Ady Clearwater Fl. Ph.: (727)562-4750, Fax: (727)5261755 WWW.MYCIGO ator.com 3aaPma pq100 C., .mSWd Y ro AOe Ay[ Mohk N w-6- 1 0 200 400 PARCEL NUMBER (WAS) j Foot -T,dr,Ye1 ed DT I - i: - � # City Owned Property w r1 00 ..... . ...... _j ........ .. ... Emm .Mimi Hill j Foot -T,dr,Ye1 ed DT I - i: - � # City Owned Property w r1 00 ..... . ...... _j ........ .. ... Emm Hill j Foot -T,dr,Ye1 ed DT I - i: - � # City Owned Property w r1 00 ..... . ...... _j ........ .. ... 1II w a Agreement to Annex > Legend SUB NUMBER • R.fm to PIaQ A Emm 1II w a Agreement to Annex > Legend SUB NUMBER • R.fm to PIaQ A T% 61,13 4 LAND HOOK (COMMON OWNERSHIP) I PLATTED SUBDIVISION BOUNDARY 7 0(3ua16% COUNTY HIGHWAY -7, CD 4. STATE HIGHWAY r U.S. HIGHWAY o S Outside City of Clearwater 6 ........... Zoning Atlas 1_2�21 ............. .. A ba . . .... . . ........ I Aug 31, 2005 li OWN 1TIT ------- NE 114 of 16-29-15 286B R L I' F. .61'1�1 [1 1 d 11 F — ': 1744TE I i t: iwv- SUBPARCELNUMBER PARCEL NUMBER (WAS) T% 61,13 4 LAND HOOK (COMMON OWNERSHIP) I PLATTED SUBDIVISION BOUNDARY 7 0(3ua16% COUNTY HIGHWAY -7, CD 4. STATE HIGHWAY r U.S. HIGHWAY o S Outside City of Clearwater 6 ........... Zoning Atlas 1_2�21 ............. .. A ba . . .... . . ........ I Aug 31, 2005 li OWN 1TIT ------- NE 114 of 16-29-15 286B R L I' F. .61'1�1 [1 1 d 11 F — ': 1744TE I i t: • Wells, Wayne • From: Watkins, Sherry Sent: Monday, September 15, 2008.4:12 PM To: Albee, Rick; Buzzell, William; Clayton, Gina; Delk, Michael; Doherty, Steve; Elbo, Bennett; Glenn, Tom; Gluski, Roberta; Kader, Art; Keller, James; Kurleman, Scott; Lee, Catherine; O'Neill, Shane; Porter, Catherine; Reid, Debbie; Rice, Scott; Rickard, Leonard; Tefft, Robert; Watkins, Sherry; Wells, Wayne Subject: CDB Resubmittals for the October 21, 2008 meeting Importance: High DRC Members, Plans for the following cases have been resubmitted for the October 21, 2008 CDB meeting: FLD2008 -08024 & DVA2008 -00001 430 S Gulfview Blvd Planner: Wayne Wells FLD2008 -08025 1160. Mandalay Point Road Planner Scott Kurleman FLD2008 -08026 210 Drew Street Planner: Wayne Wells FLD2008 -05013 100 Coronado Dr Planner Wayne Wells 1 have placed one copy of the case resubmittal package on the cabinets outside of Room 216 in our office for your review (please do not take it, as we need it for CDB mail out). Please review your comments /conditions for this case in Permit Plan and determine if they are met. Whether the conditions are "met" or still "not met," please affirm to me . via email. Please have cases reviewed, if possible by 12:pm on, Friday, September 19, 2008. Sherry Watkins Administrative Analyst Planning Department 727 -562 -4582 • i 9:00 am Case Number: FLD2008 -08026 -- 210 DREW ST. FM' 9.4.08 Dec Owner(s): City Of Clearwater Attn:. Cash & Investments. Mgr �IIAI�w:�► P B 4748 W. %J 1% Clearwater, F133758 TELEPHONE: No Phone, FAX:. No. Fax, E -MAIL: No. Email Applicant City Of Clearwater 100 S Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, F133756 TELEPHONE:.. 727 -562 -4743, FAX:. No Fax, E- MAIL:.. No. Email Representative:. Michael Quillen Po Box 4748 Clearwater, F133758 -4748 TELEPHONE:. 727 -562 -4747, FAX: 727-562-4755,. E- MAIL: michael.quillen @myclearwater.com Location: 23.96 acres located along the Downtown Clearwater Harbor between Drew Street (north) and Pierce Street (south) Atlas Page: 286A Zoning District: D, Downtown Request: Flexible Development approval to. permit a marina for 131 slips in the Downtown (D) District with a reduction to. the side (north) setback from x to y feet, a reduction to the side (south) setback from 197 to 43 feet and an increase to the maximum width from 75% of the lot width (x feet) to x% of the lot width (x feet), under the provisions of Sections 2- 903.H, 3- 601.C.3. and 3 -603. Proposed Use: Marinas Neighborhood Association(s): Clearwater Neighborhoods Coalition TELEPHONE: No. Phone, FAX: No. Fax, E- MAIL: No Email Neighborhood Association(s):. Old Clearwater Bay Neighborhood Clearwater, F133767 1828 Venetian Point Drive TELEPHONE: 461 -0564, FAX:. No Fax, E- MAIL:. southern @tampabay.rr.com Presenter: Wayne Wells, Planner. III Attendees Included: City: Wayne Wells, Robert Tefft, Scott Rice, Phuong Vo, Jim Keller, Tom Glenn, Bill Morris. Applicant: Mike Quillen, Ed Chesney, Mike Rice, David Breerley The DRC reviewed this application with the following comments: Development Review Agenda — Thursday, September 4, 2008 — Page 1 of 9 General Engineering:. 1. General Note: DRC. review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. Environmental: 1. No. issues. Fire:. 1.. Show and label FDC. locations and all associated Fire Hydrants.. PRIOR TO CDB 2.. Add general note to state intent to meet NFPA 303. requirements for standpipe systems. PRIOR TO CDB Harbor Master:. 1 . 8/26/08 -. Per Bill Morris -. I and my staff have reviewed this and the only thing we could find is not on a numbered page but near the front of the application Under Flexible Development Application Applicant Reponses. I am not sure if they are material to the application in that it concerns the Job classification we say we will put in the office on site and that has not been decided yet. Section D.. Written Submittal requirements (Code Section 3- 19.A) Subparagraph 6... Where it speaks to Hours of Operation.. It is worded that:. ". The Downtown Boat Slips will be staffed 24 hours a day, Seven Days a week. The staffing will consist of a Dock Master. office. Staff manned by a Marine Trades worker from 6:30 Am until 9 PM and a police Aide Security Guard from 9 PM until 6:30 AM the next morning. ". It should read:. The Downtown Boat Slips will be staffed 24. hours a day,. Seven Days a week.. The staffing will consist of a Dock Master office Staff from 6:30 Am until 9 PM and a police Aide Security Guard from 9 PM until 6:30 AM the next morning.". similarly further down in the same section the last paragraph in Section 6 Says the office; will be staffed with a Marine Facility Operator " and it should just say: Development Review Agenda — Thursday, September 4, 2008 — Page 2 of 9 • 9 "will be staffed with Marine Department personnel" and in the last line of that same paragraph the words:. "Marine Facility Operator ". Should be:. "Marine. Department staff' Legal:. 1. No. issues. Land Resources:. 1 .. No Issues. Landscaping: 1 . See. Zoning comments. Parks and Recreation: I . The Public Art and Design Impact Fee is due on this project, pending transfer of impact fee funds. Please contact Chris Hubbard with any questions 562 -4837. 2 No. issues in regards to P &R impact fees - City project. Stormwater:. 1 The following shall be addressed prior to issuance of the Building Permit:. 1. Sheet C -15: Provide invert elevations and slope of the proposed 18" RCP. 2. Sheet C -15: Provide a detail of the proposed gutter grate.. Please show the connection of this grate with the adjacent structure and/or pavement in a larger scale.. 3. Sheet C -17: Provide a detail of proposed inlet type C... 4. , Sheet C -17:. Provide invert elevations and slope of the proposed 15" RCPs 5. Sheet C -17: What type of manhole is proposed on the. existing pipe? Will it be a doghouse type? Provide a detail of this proposed manhole.. General note: 1. DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. Solid Waste:. Development Review Agenda — Thursday, September 4, 2008 — Page 3 of 9 No Comments Traffic Engineering: 1. The City's parallel parking dimensions are measured 8' wide by 23' long... If the parallel parking spaces along Cleveland Street and Drew. Street are striped to 23' in length then the applicant can acquire more public parking spaces.. 2.. Describe where and how boats will be unloaded and loaded with a boat trailer?. The above to be addressed prior to a Community Development Board (CDB) hearing.. The following to be addressed prior to a Building Permit:. 1.. On page D -l. of the detail page see handicap parking sign, change the Florida Statute number to read "F.S.. 318.18 ". 2. Add to the projects detail sheet the F.D.O.T.'s truncated dome detail (Index 304 page 6 of 6). See link provided:. http://www.dot.state.fl.us/rddesign/rd/RTDS/08/304.pdf General Note(s): 1) Applicant shall comply with the current Transportation Impact Fee Ordinance and fee schedule and paid prior to. a Certificate of Occupancy (C.O.). 2) DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. Planning: 1... Description of Request on Page 1. of the application needs to. include all setback reductions (north and south) and width increase. The reduction to the required setback should be written "a reduction to the side (south) setback from 197. to. 43. feet ".. Additionally, there should be a reduction to the side (north). setback as the existing dock, nor the proposed extension, does not appear to be 197 feet from the north property line extended.. Finally, there may be a dock width increase, because we need to, look at the TOTAL width of the docks (existing and proposed) from the north "end" to. the south "end ", including the Memorial Bridge Causeway area (not an addition of 535'+ 503'). See other comments about dimensioning. 2. Site Plans need to show the following:. a. City property lines on the north and south; Development Review Agenda — Thursday, September 4, 2008 — Page 4 of 9 • b.. A dimension as to the property width (it has been indicated as 1,970 feet but I have no drawings that show such dimension); C. The property lines (see "a" above) need to be extended into. the water; d... Setback dimensions need to. be indicated from the property lines (north and south) to the closest part of the docks (existing and proposed) on the north and south.. On the north side there is the existing fishing pier that is included as part of the "dock ". and there is an extension of such that also. includes the floating dock that keeps boats out of the sea grass area; e. A dimension as to. the dock width (that dimension between the setbacks requested); f.. A dimension as to. the dock length (it has been indicated as 675 feet, but I have no drawings that show such dimension); and g. A dimension showing the width of the waterway that the docks are being located within (response to Section 3- 601.C.3.h.ii refers to 75% of the waterway width being 1,477 feet, but it is 75% of what dimension ?)... 3.. The first page of the application indicates the following parcel numbers are involved with this application: 16-29-15- 00000 -210- 0110; 16- 29 -15- 00000 - 210 -0100; 16- 29 -15- 43956- 000 -0010; 16- 29-15- 76482 - 002 -0010; and 16- 29 -15- 20358- 001- 0040. After cross - referencing with the Pinellas County Property Appraiser's office, it does not appear that these are all of the parcel numbers for property involved with this project. For advertising purposes, I need to ensure all affect parcel numbers are listed on the application. Please check with the Property Appraiser's office for all affected parcels.. I have a map that indicates the properties listed above by parcel number that you may have to assist in determining all affected parcel numbers. 4 . Need to complete the Affidavit to Authorize Agent (page 7. of the application) by including the. appropriate information in Sections 1, 2,3 and 4. 5_ Response to. General Applicability criteria #2 -. The boat slip . project is also abuts the Scientology property on the north side of Drew Street. Revise response to. include this adjacent property. 6.. Response to General Applicability criteria #5 -. In the 4th line, change "compliment ". to. "complement ". 7. Response to General Applicability criteria #6 - The response . refers to "the public docks ".. Am unclear where such" "public. docks are located, as the Misener Marine plan does not indicate. where the "public docks" are. Expand the written material in this Development Review Agenda — Thursday, September 4, 2008 — Page 5 of 9 criteria response and provide a plan as to where such "public docks" are located. 8.. City of Clearwater Land Ownership - This paragraph describes what submerged land the City owns. Can there. be submitted a map. showing what the City owns (even if 8.5 "x11" in size) with an indication (generally) where a lease will be necessary from the State? 9. Project Description - The first paragraph mentions a "ferry landing ", but there is no. plan that shows where that is to. occur. Indicate such on plans. Additionally, suggest expanding the written material to discuss what is meant by a "ferry landing ", including where such a ferry might operate between other location(s), where such a ferry might dock (it probably won't operate 24 hours a day, so that it will be docked someplace just like any other boat), the operational characteristics of such a ferry, the positives and negatives for having such a ferry landing, how it relates to. upland improvements (including the drop off area and parking), etc. 10. Responses to Section 3- 601.C.3.a.ii) - The response needs to comment only on the docks and not the dock master building or other upland improvements. . It is important to. note in the response that this is a publicly owned marina, which may not be consistent with docks on adjacent properties, but is also as generally approved by the voters in 2007. 11 . Responses to Section 3- 601.C.3.b -. Need to include how the design of the docks will not inhibit boat traffic within the channel of the Intracoastal Waterway and how the dock design will provide a defined location for transient slips for events at Coachman Park. 12. Responses to Section 3- 601.C.3.c - There is no plan that shows where the channel of the Intracoastal Waterway, is located, especially in proximity to. the proposed marina.. Include such. 13... Responses to. Section 3- 601.C.3.d.i) - The slip layout plan by Misener has been referenced as to the location of sea grass beds. However, the shading of such beds is not called out as "sea grass beds" so. that it is clear as to what the shading depicts. In the South Basin, what will prevent boaters from traveling eastward closer to the seawall, and into the sea grass bed, east of Dock D? Will there be any signs restricting access to this eastern area? 14. Responses to Section 3- 601.C.3.e.i). -. Part of the criteria was left out when typed (add in). Also, the response in the last paragraph needs to address the one -foot minimum clearance distance between the bottom of the vessel and the bottom of the water body at mean or ordinary low water. Development Review Agenda — Thursday, September 4, 2008 — Page 6 of 9 0 9 15 . Responses to Section 3- 601.C.3.h.i). - Need to. also deal with any setback reduction on the north side. For both the north and south side setback reductions, need to provide justification for such reductions. 16 Responses to Section 3- 601.C.3.h.ii) - Need to also indicate that the length of the docks is restricted by the channel of the Intracoastal Waterway. 17. Responses to Section 3- 601.C.3.h.iii) -. See other comments needing dimensions on plans showing the waterfront width (indicated as 1,970 feet in width).. Width of the dock must be measured from the northernmost tip of the existing fishing pier. (closest to the seawall) in the North Basin to the southernmost tip of the wave attenuator on the south side of Dock A in the South Basin. You cannot take out for the Memorial Causeway Bridge. It appears that the width will exceed the 75% rule. Will need to determine the actual width, include such in the. request and provide justification for such increase in width. 18 . Responses to Section 3- 601.C.3.i -. This is a publicly owned facility. Need to. provide. a response. 19.. Response to Section 3 -603.A - Response states that sewerage: pump out facilities will be provided. Unclear if this is a change from prior Committee meetings, as I do not recollect such facility to be provided. If to be provided, show where such will occur and the operational aspects of such. 20. Response to Section 3 -603.B -. Need to address all aspects of the criteria (only fueling addressed). Additionally, the proposed marina is not adjacent to residentially zoned property. 21 . Response to Section 3- 603.C. - Response appears inconsistent with that in the Response to Section 3- 603.A, where sewerage . pump out is proposed. Need to expound and clarify. 22. Response to Section 3 -603.F -. Did not address "adequate sanitary facilities" landside (at the. dock master building). 23 Response to Section 3 -603.I -Need to provide a response, beyond that other agencies approval processes will require . demonstrate adequate tidal flushing and aquatic circulation patterns. 24.. Dock master building -. There needs to be a discussion in the application material as to. what functions will occur at this building (dock master offices, laundry, restroom and showers).. Need to discuss (possibly if floor plans are available [existing versus proposed] to. assist visually) the existing building, how it has been used, how it will be renovated and expanded and how it will function. 25... Sheet C -10 - Wheel stops are required for the eastern parking spaces in the southern parking lot (Section 3- 1204.D). Because . the western parking spaces are flush with the sidewalk, it is Development Review Agenda — Thursday, September 4, 2008 — Page 7 of 9 0 9 highly recommended to. install wheel stops to prevent vehicle encroaching the sidewalk and traveling into the water (same comment is applicable to. the parking spaces on .the west side of the northern parking lot on Sheets C -11. and C -12). 26. Sheets C -2, C -5, C -6, C -9, C -10, C -13, C -14, C -17, C -18, C -21, E -1 & E -4 -. Show property lines (there is private property to. the. west and to. the north). 27. Sheets C -2, C -4, C -5, C -6, C -8 & C -9 - Remove proposed boat slips from the "Existing Site Plan". and "Demolition Plan". sheets. 28_ Sheet C -11 - Dimension the width of the sidewalk west of the northern parking lot. 29... Sheet C -11. Dimension the width of the landscape area between the northern parking lot and street curb for parallel parking spaces. 30 . Sheet C -11. - Parking spaces have been dimensioned as nine -feet wide typically with an overall dimension of 36'. It was previously recommended to make the landscape island on the south side of the handicap. parking space 0.9 feet larger.. Instead, the HC space has been widened to 13 feet. Reduce the HC space. to. 12 feet and convert the 0.9 or 1 -foot to landscaping as previously requested. 31_ Sheets C -11. & C -12 - It appears that the concrete curb proposed on the west side of the parking spaces in the northern parking lot on the 90% plans has been removed. As such, it appears, based on the ME indicated on Sheets C -15 and C -16, that there should be no need for a handicap. ramp for the handicap. space in the western sidewalk. 32.. Sheet C -12 - Indicate the width of the sidewalk along the seawall. 33 . Sheet C -12 Indicate the width of the driveway into the northern parking lot. 34. Sheet C -13 - It was previously recommended to install a flagpole . in front of the harbormaster building.. If to be provided, need to show location on this sheet (need to also indicate proposed height of flagpole). 35.. Sheets C -18, C -19 and C -20 Code requires interior landscaping at a rate of 10% of the vehicular use area of these two parking lots, with one shade tree per 150 square feet of interior landscape area (two. accent trees =. one shade tree, planted relatively close to each other; three palms = one shade tree, planted in a cluster of three). Revise to provide the required number of trees. 36. Sheets C -18 and C -19 - Fire truck access from north end of southern parking lot to Cleveland Street - How will the fire truck driver know the location of the geoweb so as to stay on the access area? Will it be outlined somehow so the driver knows the path?. Is the sidewalk along Cleveland Street being designed to. withstand the weight of the fire truck? Development Review Agenda — Thursday, September 4, 2008 — Page 8 of 9 0 0 37- Sheets C -19 and C -20 - Landscape islands in the northern parking lot are large enough for shade trees to be planted. Alternately, . two accent trees or three palms are required in the'islands. 38.. Sheet D -6 - Move to. be Sheet C -22. 39.. Sheet D -6 (should be C -22) Revise the Landscape Schedule for the following: a. Indicate for the LI, LI2 and LJ. that they must be a minimum of 2 ". caliper at time of planting; and b.. Indicate there must be a rain sensor for the irrigation system. 40. To be clear, is the electric. service for the bollard lights and the parking lot lights for the southern parking lot being placed underground? 41. Need a detail for the compactor dumpster enclosure.. Unclear how one gets into the dumpster enclosure to dump the trash... Unclear of the exterior material and color of the dumpster enclosure, including the gates. Other:. No. Comments Notes: Sufficient - To be placed on the 10/21/08 CDB agenda, submit 15 collated copies of the revised plans & application material. addressing all above departments' comments by noon, 9/15/08. Packets shall be collated, folded and stapled as appropriate. Development Review Agenda — Thursday, September 4, 2008 — Page 9 of 9 t Y rwater le DRAFT ACTION AGENDA DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE Thursday, September 4, 2008 8:30 a.m. STAFF REVIEW 9:00 am Case Number: FLD2008 -08026 -- 210 DREW. ST Owner(s): City. Of Clearwater Attn:. Cash & Investments Mgr Clearwater, F133758 TELEPHONE:. No Phone, FAX:. No Fax, E -MAIL: No Email Applicant City. Of Clearwater 100 S Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, F133756 TELEPHONE: 727 -562 -4743, FAX:. No Fax, E -MAIL: No Email Representative: Michael Quillen Po. Box 4748 Printed: 9/2/2008 Times are subject to change PM4 1,64608 Paco tmftpon4l Clearwater, F133758 -4748 TELEPHONE:. 727 -562 -4747, FAX:. 727 -562 -4755, . E- MAIL: michael.quillen @myclearwater.com Location: 23.96 acres located along the Downtown Clearwater Harbor between Drew Street (north). and Pierce. Street (south) Atlas Page: 286A Zoning District: D, Downtown Request: Flexible Development approval to permit a marina for 1.31. slips in the Downtown (D) District with a side (south) setback reduction from 197. to. 43. feet, under the provisions of Sections 2- 903.1-1, 3- 601.C.3 and 3 -603. Proposed Use: Marinas Neighborhood Clearwater Neighborhoods Coalition Association(s): TELEPHONE: No Phone, FAX: No Fax, E -MAIL: No Email Neighborhood Old Clearwater Bay Neighborhood Association(s): Clearwater, F133767 1828. Venetian Point Drive TELEPHONE: 461 -0564, FAX: No Fax, E- MAIL: southern @tampabay.rr.com Presenter: Wayne. Wells, Planner III Attendees Included: City: Wayne. Wells, Scott Rice, Steve. Doherty, Jim Keller, Rick Albee, Tom Glenn Applicant: Mike Quillen, Ed Chesney, Dave Gildersleeve, The DRC reviewed this application with the following comments: General Engineering: 1 . General Note:. DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. Environmental:. 1— No issues. Fire: 1 . Show and label FDC locations and all associated Fire Hydrants. PRIOR TO CDB 2. Add general note to state intent to meet NFPA 303. requirements for standpipe systems. PRIOR TO CDB Harbor. Master: Development Review Agenda -. Thursday, September 4, 2008 -. Page 1 DRC Action Agmda I.1 1.. 8/26/08 Per Bil Orris - • I and my staff have reviewed this and the only thing we could find is not on a numbered page but near the front of the application Under Flexible Development Application Applicant Reponses.. I am not sure if they are material to the application in that it concerns the Job classification we say we will put in the office on site and that has not been decided yet. Section D. Written Submittal requirements (Code Section 3 -19.A) Subparagraph 6. Where it speaks to Hours of Operation. It is worded that: " The Downtown Boat Slips will be staffed 24 hours a day, Seven Days a week. The staffing will consist of a Dock Master office Staff manned by a Marine. Trades worker from 6:30 Am until 9. PM and a police Aide. Security Guard from 9 PM until 6:30. AM the next morning." It should read: " The Downtown Boat Slips will be staffed 24 hours a day, Seven Days a week. The staffing will consist of a Dock Master office. Staff from 6:30 Am until 9. PM and a police Aide. Security Guard from 9 PM until 6:30 AM the next morning.", similarly further down in the same section the last paragraph in Section 6 Says the office; will be staffed with a Marine. Facility. Operator " and it should just say: will be staffed with Marine Department personnel " and in the last line of that same paragraph the words: " Marine Facility. Operator " Should be: " Marine Department staff " Legal: I . No issues. Land Resources: I. No. Issues. Landscaping: I . See Zoning comments. Parks and Recreation: 1 . The Public. Art and Design Impact Fee is due on this project, pending transfer of impact fee. funds. Please contact Chris Hubbard with any questions 562 -4837. 2. No issues in regards to P &R impact fees -. City. project. Stormwater: Development Review Agenda - Thursday, September 4, 2008 - Page 2 DRC Action Agmda 1.1 I . The following shoe addressed prior to issuance of the Building at: 1. Sheet C -15:. Provide invert elevations and slope of the proposed 18" RCP. 2. Sheet C -15: Provide a detail of the proposed gutter grate. Please show the connection of this grate with the adjacent structure and/or pavement in a larger scale. 3.. Sheet C -17:. Provide a detail of proposed inlet type C. 4.. Sheet C -17: Provide invert elevations and slope of the proposed 15" RCPs 5. Sheet C -17: What type of manhole is proposed on the existing pipe? Will it be a doghouse type ?. Provide a detail of this proposed manhole. General note:. 1. DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. Solid Waste: 1 . How will solid waste be handled ?.. Where? Traffic Engineering: 1'. The City's parallel parking dimensions are measured 8'. wide by 23'. long.. If the parallel parking spaces along Cleveland Street and Drew Street are striped to 23'. in length then the applicant can aqcuire more public parking spaces. 2. Describe where and how boats will be unloaded and loaded with a boat trailer? The above to be addressed prior to a Community Development Board (CDB) hearing. Planning: The following to be addressed prior to a Building Permit: 1. On page D -1 of the detail page see handicap parking sign, change the. Florida Statute number to read. "F.S. 318.18 ". 2. Add to the projects detail sheet the F.D.O.T.'s truncated dome detail (Index 304 page 6 of 6). See link provided: http: / /www. dot. state .fl.us /rddesign/rd/RTDS /08 /304.pdf General Note(s):. 1) Applicant shall comply with the current Transportation Impact Fee Ordinance and fee schedule and paid prior to a Certificate of Occupancy (C.O.). 2) DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. Development Review Agenda -. Thursday, September 4, 2008 -. Page 3 DRC Action Agenda )A I . Description of Reot on Page 1 of the application needs to includ* setback reductions (north and south) and width increase. The reduction to the required setback should be written "a reduction to the side (south) setback from 197. to 43 feet ". Additionally, there should be a reduction to the side (north) setback as the existing dock, nor the proposed extension, does not appear to be 197 feet from the north property line extended. Finally, there may be a dock width increase, because we need to look at the TOTAL width of the docks (existing and proposed) from the north "end" to. the south "end ", including the Memorial Bridge. Causeway area (not an addition of 535' + 503'). See other comments about dimensioning. 2. Site Plans need to show the following: a. City property lines on the north and south; b. A dimension as to the property width (it has been indicated as 1,970 feet but I have no drawings that show such dimension); c. The property lines (see "a" above) need to be extended into the water; d. Setback dimensions need to be indicated from the property, lines (north and south) to the closest part of the docks (existing and proposed) on the north and south. On the north side there is the existing fishing pier that is included as part of the "dock ". and there is an extension of such that also includes the floating dock that keeps boats out of the seagrass area; e. A dimension as to the dock width (that dimension between the setbacks requested); f. A dimension as to the dock length (it has been indicated as 675 feet, but I have no drawings that show such dimension); and g. A dimension showing the width of the waterway that the docks are being located within (response to Section 3- 601.C.3.h.ii refers to 75% of the waterway width being 1,477 feet, but it is 75% of what dimension ?). 3. The first page of the application indicates the following parcel numbers are involved with this application: 16-29-15-00000-210-0110; 16-29-15-00000-210-0100; 16-29-15-43956-000-0010; 16- 29 -15- 76482 - 002 -0010; and 16- 29 -15- 20358- 001 -0040. After cross - referencing with the Pinellas County Property. Appraiser's office, it does not appear that these are all of the parcel numbers for property involved with this project. For advertising purposes, I need to ensure all affect parcel numbers are listed on the application. Please. check with the Property. Appraiser's office for all affected parcels. I have a map that indicates the properties listed above by parcel number that you may have to assist in determining all affected parcel numbers. 4. Need to complete the Affidavit to Authorize. Agent (page 7 of the application). by including the appropriate information in Sections 1, 2,3 and 4. 5. Response to General Applicability. criteria #2 - The boat slip project is also. abutts the Scientology property on the north side of Drew Street.. Revise response to. include this adjacent property.. 6. Response to General Applicability criteria #5. -. In the. 4th line, change "compliment ". to "complement ". 7. Response to General Applicability criteria #6 -. The response refers to "the public docks ". Am unclear where such "public docks" are located, as the Misener Marine plan does not indicate . where the "public docks" are. Expand the. written material in this criteria response and provide a plan as to where. such "public docks ". are located. 8. City of Clearwater Land Ownership - This paragraph describes what submerged land the City owns. Can there be submitted a map showing what the City owns (even if 8.5 "x11 in size) with an indication (generally) where a lease. will be necessary. from the State? 9. Project Description - The first paragraph mentions a "ferry landing ", but there is no plan that shows where that is to occur. Indicate such on plans. Additionally, suggest expanding the written material to discuss what is meant by a "ferry landing ", including where such a ferry might operate between other location(s), where such a ferry might dock (it probably won't operate 24 hours a day, so that it will be docked someplace just like any other boat), the operational characteristics of such a ferry, the positives and negatives for having such a ferry landing, how it relates to upland improvements (including the dropoff area and parking), etc. 10. Responses to Section 3- 601.C.3.a.ii). -. The. response needs to comment only on the. docks and not the dockmaster building or other upland improvements. It is important to note in the response that this is a publicly -owned marina, which may not be consistent with docks on adjacent properties, but is also as generally approved by the voters in 2007. 11 . Responses to Section 3- 601.C.3.b - Need to. include how the design of the docks will not inhibit boat traffic within the channel of the Inracoastal Waterway and how the dock design will provide a defined location for transient slips for events at Coachman Park. Development Review Agenda - Thursday, September 4, 2008 - Page 4 DRC Action Agmda L 1 12 . Responses to Sect- 601.C.3.c - There is no plan that shows where channel of the Intracoastal Waterway is located, especially in proximity to the proposed marina. Include such. 13. Responses to Section 3- 601.C.3.d.i) - The slip layout plan by Misener has been referenced as to the location of sea grass beds. However, the shading of such beds is not called out as "sea grass beds" so that it is clear as to what the shading depicts. In the South Basin, what will prevent boaters from traveling eastward closer to the seawall, and into the sea grass bed, east of Dock D?. Will there be any signs restricting access to this eastern area? 14. Responses to Section 3- 601.C.3.e.i). - Part of the criteria was left out when typed (add in).. Also, the response in the last paragraph needs to. address the one -foot minimum clearance distance between the bottom of the vessel and the bottom of the water body at mean or ordinary low water. 15. Responses to Section 3- 601.C.3.h.i) - Need to also deal with any setback reduction on the north side. For both the north and south side setback reductions, need to provide justification for such reductions. 16. Responses to Section 3- 601.C.3.h.ii). -. Need to also indicate that the length of the docks is restricted by the channel of the Intracoastal Waterway. 17. Responses to Section 3- 601.C.3.h.iii) - See other comments needing dimensions on plans showing the waterfront width (indicated as 1,970 feet in width). Width of the dock must be measured from the northernmost tip of the existing fishing pier (closest to the seawall) in the North Basin to the southernmost tip of the wave attenuator on the south side of Dock A in the South Basin. You cannot take out for the Memorial Causeway Bridge. It appears that the width will exceed the 75% rule. Will need to determine the actual width, include such in the request and provide justification for such increase in width. 18_ Responses to Section 3- 601.C.3.i -. This is a publicly owned facility. Need to provide a response. 19. Response to Section 3 -603.A - Response states that sewerage pump out facilities will be provided.. Unclear if this is a change from prior Committee meetings, as I do not recollect such facility to be provided. If to be provided, show where such will occur. and the operational aspects of such. 20. Response to Section 3 -603.13 - Need to address all aspects of the criteria (only fueling addressed). Additionally, the proposed marina is not adjacent to residentially zoned property. 21 . Response to Section 3 -603.0 -. Response appears inconsistent with that in the Response to Section 3- 603.A, where sewerage pump. out is proposed. Need to expound and clarify. 22. Response. to. Section 3 -6031 -. Did not address "adequate sanitary. facilities ". landside (at the dock master building). 23_ Response to Section 3 -603.I - Need to provide a response, beyond that other agencies approval processes will require demonstrate adequate tidal flushing and aquatic circulation patterns. 24. Dock master building - There needs to be a discussion in the application material as to what functions will occur at this building (dock master offices, laundry, restroom and showers). Need to discuss (possibly if floor plans are available [existing versus proposed] to assist visually) the existing building, how it has been used, how it will be renovated and expanded and how it will function. 25. Sheet C -10 Wheel stops are required for the eastern parking spaces in the southern parking lot (Section 3- 1204.D). Because the western parking spaces are flush with the. sidewalk, it is highly recommended to install wheel stops to prevent vehicle encroaching the sidewalk and traveling into the water (same comment is applicable to the parking spaces on the west side of the northern parking lot on Sheets C -11 and C -12). 26. Sheets C -2, C -5, C -6, C -9, C -10, C -13, C -14, C -17, C -18, C -21, E -1 & E -4 - Show property lines (there is private property to the west and to the north). 27. Sheets C -2, C -4, C -5, C -6, C -8 & C -9 Remove proposed boat slips from the "Existing Site Plan ". and "Demolition Plan" sheets. 28 . Sheet C -11 Dimension the width of the sidewalk west of the northern parking lot. 29.. Sheet C -11 - Dimension the width of the landscape area between the northern parking lot and street curb for parallel parking spaces. 30. Sheet C -11 - Parking spaces have been dimensioned as nine -feet wide typically with an overall dimension of 36'. It was previously recommended to make the landscape island on the south side of the handicap parking space 0.9 feet larger. Instead, the HC space has been widened to 13 feet. Reduce the HC space to 12 feet and convert the 0.9 or 1 -foot to landscaping as previoiusly requested. Development Review Agenda - Thursday, September 4, 2008 - Page 5 DRC Action Agmda I.1 31 . Sheets C -11 & C -O-kt appears that the concrete curb proposed on test side of the parking spaces in the northern parking lot on the 90% plans has been removed.. As such, it appears, based on the ME indicated on Sheets C -15 and C -16, that there should be no need for a handicap ramp for the handicap space in the western sidewalk. 32. Sheet C -12 Indicate the width of the sidewalk along the seawall. 33. Sheet C -12 Indicate the width of the driveway into the northern parking lot. 34. Sheet C -13. - It was previously recommended to install a flagpole in front of the harbormaster building. If to be provided, need to show location on this sheet (need to. also indicate proposed height of flagpole). 35. Sheets C -18, C -19. and C -20 -. Code requires interior landscaping at a rate of 10% of the vehicular. use area of these two parking lots, with one shade. tree per 150 square feet of interior landscape. area (two accent trees = one shade tree, planted relatively close to each other; three palms = one shade tree, planted in a cluster of three).. Revise to provide the required number of trees. 36— Sheets C -18 and C -19 - Fire truck access from north end of southern parking lot to Cleveland Street -. How will the fire truck driver know the location of the geoweb so as to stay on the access area? Will it be outlined somehow so the driver knows the path?.. Is the sidewalk along Cleveland Street being designed to withstand the weight of the fire truck? 37.. Sheets C -19. and C -20 - Landscape islands in the northern parking lot are large enough for shade trees to be planted. Alternately, two accent trees or three palms are required in the islands. 38. Sheet D -6 - Move to be Sheet C -22. 39. Sheet D -6 (should be. C -22) -. Revise the Landscape Schedule for the following: a. Indicate for the LI, LI2 and LJ that they must be a minimum of 2" caliper at time of planting; and b. Indicate there must be a rain sensor for the irrigation system. 40.. To be clear, is the electric service for the bollard lights and the parking lot lights for the southern . parking lot being placed underground? 41.. Need a detail for the compactor dumpster enclosure. Unclear how one gets into the dumpster enclosure to dump the trash.. Unclear of the exterior material and color of the dumpster enclosure, including the gates. Other: No Comments Notes: Sufficient To be placed on the 10/21/08 CDB agenda, submit 15 collated copies of the revised plans & application material addressing all above departments' comments by noon, 9/15/08.. Packets shall be collated, folded and stapled as appropriate. Development Review Agenda - Thursday, September 4, 2008. - Page 6 DRC Action Agmda 1.1 Wells,. Wayne From: Morris, William. D. Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2008.11:27 AM To: Wells, Wayne Cc: Buysse, Beverly A.; Yellin, Catherine; Lutz, Deb; 'DGILDERSLEEVE @WadeTrim.com ;. Chesney,. Ed Subject: RE: FLD2008- 08026 -.210 Drew Street, Downtown. Boat Slips Wayne, I and my staff have reviewed this and the. only thing we could find is not on a numbered page but near the front of the application Under Flexible Development Application Applicant Reponses. I am not sure if they are material to the application in that it concerns the. Job classification we say we will. put in the office on site. and that has not been decided yet. Section D. Written Submittal requirements. (Code Section 3 -19.A) Subparagraph. 6. Where it speaks to Hours of Operation.. It is worded that: " The Downtown. Boat Slips will be staffed 24 hours a day, Seven Days a week. The staffing will consist of a Dock Master office Staff manned by a Marine Trades worker from 6:30 Am. until 9 PM and a police. Aide Security Guard from 9. PM until 6:30. AM the next morning." It should read: ". The Downtown Boat Slips. will be staffed 24 hours. a day, Seven. Days a week. The staffing will consist of a Dock Master office Staff from. 6:30 Am until 9 PM and. a police Aide Security Guard. from 9 PM until 6:30 AM the next morning." similarly further down in the same section the last paragraph in Section 6. Says the office; Of will be staffed with a Marine Facility Operator " and it should just say: will be staffed with Marine Department personnel " and in the last line of that same paragraph the words: Marine. Facility Operator " Should be: Marine Department staff. " Thanks for the reminder,. We will. determine the job classification of the office staff at a later date,. Bill. M - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Monday, August 25, 2008 7:48 PM To: Morris, William D. Subject: FLD2008 -08026 -. 210 Drew Street, Downtown Boat Slips Bill - Do you have any comments on this case for the September 4, 2008, DRC. meeting?. Please let me know by noon on Wednesday, August 27, 2008, so that I can input your comments into Permit Plan for our pre -DRC meeting at 9:00 am on Thursday morning, August 28,. 2008. Wayne M. Wells, A/CP Planner III City of Clearwater 100 South Myrtle Avenue a. �. � - M i� � � � �k'- �. 4'r A�.. 4. i � i'R" i r r� 4 _ ,� - - - ,,w - _ x : . �. I P I P I `•• . I 1 iI �Dle IP I pE A z 3 v� z.. i5 i il®� ��1�! ■ill /1 , • , �' ' -I' 31{13 lain II,� aj'•I 1 — -- _ ' i* ED L J � i ,I, wl 'I `!,_k Lm21. JI, I,j >I• __- - , vEnca wal I � �e�ra i im t Jrto, 1m e.n 1! Y IT t2 I �� -i[, ....�_..._ ____ 711 •�' 0. L°nn J I 5 F;, IT >: r r a u a a 74; -- - -��'— Mo I - I I ROOERS 3T - -- – –�Se RpeEaS ST St." D M. z�Clearwater U Prepared by: Engineering Department Geographic Txhnology Division 10D S. Myrtb Ave, Clmmater, FL 11756 Ph: (727)552.6750, Fax: (727)5264755 www.Myclmrwatercom D6WImr PiE1c hbmrlM d,b N Imialdb7M OydDb�«err En yn..Mq D. Wn.nt .la,,."e e..o<,vrd.d,a.d �M I.ciPW a wan M w.r:wa q ar M ee, rRd..d mNCbdbM pupm. darYOpNp a ppNe Inm,•n..1,..a.ry.,v �n M oTrdcw«r.m.c., ti+MOa, .xp.swEaIrRYMd wMq M.avMy, mrpVr,.v, neltlHr.> 3Nnydtlt, 6b bra• .•«sq�akd�us WMmM �Ceyd LMwWr /Wey wlwbe.•wr Yd,ImrM VSo �rducad,r� N 1 inch equals 200 feel W� E zoo too o z a Feel Legend 4 City Owned Property • Agreement to Annex 12315 J SUB NUMBER ('- Referto PlaQ OBLOCK NUMBER O SUB PARCEL NUMBER OPARCEL NUMBER (M&B) '` -- LAND HOOK (COMMON OWNERSHIP / PLATTED SUBDMSION BOUNDARY ,Q COUNTY HIGHWAY QQ STATE HIGHWAY ' U.S. HIGHWAY Outside City of Clearwater RESOEMUILMTRICTS ----- —' UM LtOR -WWM Dm#J R.,I " •SXi •M.d,xn D.mlr R.M.red MOR - NMun1'bn DawtYR..W-W 1CR -Han D.mEY Rgdwtl,l a -MbNM MwM P.rt CRNCOD • Waclmm RNp H.bae.aa.e Caw.neq, �t•CDD - hQ"'YIN E,na.. nLyewhmA Caawvlbn Drwl.y Dr.ela SPECLA ME CWWTS COWAERtNL c13Tr4 T5 art -hae•u Pte. -T.rMtar O.O I - htllwJa,al T.Ta �R .�� .d U_Cmm,ed,l D.w ten Zoning Atlas Aug 22, 2007 NE 114 of 16 -29 -15 286B 10roperty Appraiser General Info ation: 16/29/15/00000/210 /0110 Cari, Interactive Map of this Comparable Sales Back to Query New Tax Collector parcel Listing Results Search Information Page 1 of 4 _ uestion/Comment about this 16/29/15/00000/210 /0110 Building 1 Data Current . as of August 24, 2008. [4:21 pm Wednesday August 27] Nonresidential Property Owner, Address, and Sales Print Retail Store Property Use: 413 - (CLEARWATER FERRY SERVICE LEASE TO YR 2000) FROM NE COR SEC 16 RUN W 2445.54FT TO PT ON SEAWALL FOR POB TH S22DW 83.02FT TH. W 143.16FT TH N 102FT TH E 184.28FT TH S22DW 26.95FT TO POB PART SUBM LAND ** Click here for short legal ** 2008 Exemptions Homestead: No Use: 0% Ownership: 0% Tax Exempt: 0% Government: Yes Institutional: No Agricultural: $0 Historic: $0 2008 Value 2008 Tax Information Comparable Sales Value:: $0 Tax District: CWD F_S._553.84.4 Just /Market_Value_ $182,400 Proposed Millage: 21.5626 Assessed Value/ SOH Cap_$182,400 Proposed Non Ad Valorem Assessments: $.00 History Taxable Value: $0 Proposed Taxes: $.00 A significant taxable value increase may Proposed Taxes without Save -Our -Homes $.00 occur when sold. Click here for details. cap: Proposed Taxes without any exemptions: $3,933.02 Owner /Mailing Address CLEARWATER, CITY OF ATTN: CASH & INVESTMENTS MGR PO BOX 4748 CLEARWATER FL 33758 -4748 Property Address ,210 DREW ST Parcel Information Book/Page: Land Use: Municipal, 01205/0410 other tha... (89) Census Tract: Evacuation Zone: A 261.00 Sale Date Book/Page Price Q/U V/I No Recent Sales Plat Year Plat Book/Page(s) Not Platted 0 http: / /www.pcpao.org /gencral _ nadet.php ?pn= 1529160000021001101 8/27/2008 *operty Appraiser General Info ation: 16/29/15/00000/210 /0110 Car Seawall: Land Information Frontage: None Land Use Land Size Municipal, other than parks recreational areas,... 15 x 83 Rivers and Lakes, Submerged Lands(95) Structural Elements Foundation: Continuous Footing Floor System: Slab on Grade Exterior Wall: Siding Average Roof Frame: Gable & Hip Roof Cover: Composition Shingle Height Factor: 0 Floor Finish: Concrete Finish Interior Finish: Drywall Party wall: None. Structural Frame: None Cabinet & Mill: Average Quality: Average Heating & Air: Heating & cooling Package Electric: Average Bath Tile: None Fixtures: 2 Total Units: 1 Year Built: 1989 Effective Age: 10 Other Depreciation: 0 Functional Depreciation: 0 Economic Depreciation: 0 Page 2 of 4 View: Unit Units Method Value . 40.00 1,245.00 S 1,000.00 .38 A Open plot in New Window View Floor: 1 ;Click here if screen is blank **-M I http: / /www.pcpao.org/general _ nadet.php ?pn= 1529160000021001101 8/27/2008 Property Appraiser General Information: 16/29/15/00000/210 /0110 Card Page 3 of 4 Sub Area information Description Building Finished Ft2 Gross Area Ft2 Factor Effective Ft2 Base Area 294 294 1.00 294 Carport Finished 280 .30 84 E Total Building Finished SF: 294 Total Gross SF: 574 Total Effective SF: 378 Nonresidential Extra Features Description Dimensions Value/Unit Units - Total NewValue Depreciated Value Year Asphalt 72600 $1.75 72600 $127,050.00 $127,050.00 Unknown Dock 1290 $25.00 1290 $32,250.00 $23,870.00 1989 http: / /www.pcpao.org/general _ nadet.php ?pn= 1529160000021001101 8/27/2008 `Welcome to VDB on the Web 10 . Page 1 of 1 _;.Aerial = Photography:. 2007 Color �t Transparency (0.0 =- in 1.0 ) A Theme Description is the-default set. It has no data S, just linework. All of the map, s are black.. http: / /vdb.pcpao.org/vdb.php - , y. : 8/27/2008 _ _' - P4operty Appraiser General Information: 16/29/15/00000/210 /0100 Car Page 1 of 2 Interactive Map of this Back to QueU New Tax Collector Question/Comment about this parcel ncbuu5 ocarcu 1.11101 uiaL10_11 parcci 16/29/15/00000/210/0100 Data Current as of August 24, 2008 [4:24 pm Wednesday August 27] Property Owner, Address, Sales Print Vacant and Property Use: 0 ; FROM NE COR OF NE 1/4 RUN W 2250 FT(S) TO W R/W OF DREW ST FOR POB TH SW'LY ALG W R/W 390 FT(S) TH W TO SEAWALL TH NE'LY 197FT (S) TH E 15FT(S) TH NE PAR TO SEAWALL 83FT TH E 185FT(S) TO POB LESS RD RW * Click here for short le a� 1 ** 2008 Exemptions. . Homestead: No Use: 0% Ownership: 0% Tax Exempt: 0% Government: Yes Institutional: No Agricultural: $0 Historic: $0 2008 Value 2008 Tax Information Comparable Sales Value:: $0 Tax District: CWD Just/Mark,et_Value_ $384,500 Proposed Millage: 21.5626 Assessed Value/ SOH Cap_$384,500 Proposed Non Ad Valorem Assessments: $.00 History Taxable Value: $0 Proposed Taxes: $.00 A significant taxable value increase may Proposed Taxes without Save - Our -Homes $.00 occur when sold. Click here for details. cap: Proposed Taxes without any exemptions: $8,290.82 Owner /Mailing Property Address Sale Date Book/Page Price Q/U VII Address No Recent Sales CLEARWATER, CITY OF ATTN: CASH & Plat Year Plat Book/Page(s) INVESTMENTS MGR Not Platted PO BOX 4748 CLEARWATER FL 33758 -4748 Parcel Information Book/Page: Land Use: Municipal, 01205/0410 other tha... (89) Census Tract: Evacuation Zone: A 261.00 Land Information Seawall: Frontage: None View: Land Use Land Size Unit Value Units Method Vacant Commerci al(10� 40.00 12,168.47 S http: / /www.pcpao.org/general _ vadet.php ?pn= 1529160000021001000 8/27/2008 Welcome to VDB on the Web Page 1 of 1 1.0 Theme Description This is the default set. It has no data layers, just linework. All of the map layers are black. I 1 11 1 http: / /vdb.pcpao.org/vdb.php 8/27/2008 Property Appraiser General Inf ation: 16/29/15/43956/000 /0010 Car Interactive Map of this Comparable Sales- Back to Query New Tax Collector parcel Listing Results Search Information 16/29/15/43956/000 /0010 Building 1 Page 1 of 5 Question/Comrnent about this ap rcel Data Current as of August 24, 2008 [4:25 pm Wednesday August 27] Nonresidential Property Owner, Address, and Sales Print Offices PMerty_.Use:413 JEFFORDS & SMOYERS 1 ST ADD LOTS 1, 4 & 5 ALL OF VAC SUNSET CT R/W & LOT 2 EXT TO SEAWALL LESS DREW ST TOGETHER WITH PART OF LOTS A & B OF SUNSET COURT SUB & PART OF BLKS 4 & 5 OF ROMPON'S & BASKIN'S CORR MAP OF CSWY BUSINESS DIST TOGETHER WITH UNPLATTED LAND TO N BND ON W & N BY DREW ST & ON E BY OSCEOLA AVE N ALL DESC AS BEG 16.73FT S OF NE COR OF BLK 5 OF ROMPON'S & BASKIN'S CORR MAP OF CSWY BUSINESS DIST TH W 291.48FT TH N 100.31FT TH CUR LT RAD 163.84FT ARC 67.2FT CB S60DW 66.75FT TH W 422.97 FT TH NE'LY 461FT(S) ALG E'LY R/W OF DREW ST TH TH E 368FT(S) ALG R/W OF DREW ST TO W R/W OF N OSCEOLA AVE TH S 448FT ALG R/W TO POB TOGETHER WITH THAT STRIP OF LAND W OF DREW ST TO SEAWALL BND ON N BY N LINE OF JEFFORDS & SMOYERS 1 ST ADD & BND ON S BY S LINE OF SUNSET COURT SUB (PER O.R. 961/347, 1205/412, 2284/554 & 9205/625) ** Click here for short legal ** 2008 Exemptions Homestead: No Use: 0% Ownership: 0% Tax Exempt: 0% Government: Yes Institutional: No Agricultural: $0 Historic: $0 2008 Value 2008 Tax Information Comparable Sales Value:: $0 Tax District: CWD F.S. 553.844 Just /Market Value: $22,790,400 Assessed Value/ SOH Cap: $22,790,400 History Taxable Value: $0 A significant taxable value increase may -occur when sold. Click here for details. Owner/Mailing Address CLEARWATER, CITY OF ATTN: CASH & INVESTMENTS MGR PO BOX 4748 Property Address 100 N OSCEOLA AVE Proposed Millage: 21.5626 Proposed Non Ad Valorem $,00 Assessments: Proposed Taxes: $.00 Proposed Taxes without Save -Our- $.00 Homes cap: Proposed Taxes without any $491,420.00 exemptions: Sale Date Book/Page Price Q/U VII No Recent Sales Plat Year Plat Book/Page(s) 1915 004/010 http: / /www.pepao.org/ general_ nadet .php ?pn = 1529164395600000101 8/27/2008 property Appraiser General Inf ation: 16/29/15/43956/000 /0010 Carj, Land Information Seawall: Frontage: None Land Use Land Size Municipal, other than parks, recreational areas - (89). Page 3 of 5 View: Unit Units Method Value 50.00 283,309.00 S Structural Elements Foundation: Spread/Monolithic Footing Floor System: Slab on Grade Exterior Wall: Glass Roof Frame: Steel Truss & Purlin Roof Cover: Custom Height Factor: 0 Floor Finish: Carpet Combination Interior Finish: Drywall Party wall: None Structural Frame: Rigid Frame Cabinet & Mill: Average No Building Drawing for this card Quality: Above Average Heating. & Air: Heating & cooling Package Electric: Average Bath Tile: Floor and Wall Fixtures: 85 Total Units: 0 Year Built: 2004 Effective Age: 4 Other Depreciation: 0 Functional Depreciation: 0 Economic Depreciation: 0 http: / /www.pcpao.org /general _ nadet.php ?pn = 1529164395600000101 8/27/2008 i4roperty Appraiser General Inf ation: 16/29/15/43956/000 /0010 Carjj Sub Area. information Page 4 of 5 Description Building Finished Ft2 Gross Area Ft2 Factor Effective Ft? Base Area 90,000 90,000 1.00 90,000 Open Porch Finished 8,550 .30 2,565 Total Building Finished SF: 90,000 Total Gross SF: 98,550 Total Effective SF: 92,565 http: / /www.pcpao.org/general _ nadet.php ?pn= 1529164395600000101 8/27/2008 Nonresidential Extra Features Description Dimensions Value/Unit Units Total NewValue Depreciated Value Year Asphalt 12500 1 $1.75 12500 $21,880.00 $21,880.00 Unknown Elevator $60,000.00 3 $180,000.00 $165,600.00 2004 Elevator Stop $3,500.00 13 $45,500.00 $41,860.00 2004 Fire Sprinkler 90000 $2.00 90000 $180,000.00 $172,800.00 2004 http: / /www.pcpao.org/general _ nadet.php ?pn= 1529164395600000101 8/27/2008 Welcome to VDB on the Web 0 Page I of I , r► r ,� a IM, 1� Photography: 12007 Color Transparency (0.0 -r�--� Theme is the default set. It has no data s, just linework. All of the map s are black.. http: / /vdb.pcpao.org/vdb.php 8/27/2008 ,.. ?r'?,roperty Appraiser General Inf ation: 16/29/15/76482/002 /0010 Car Page 1 of 2 Interactive MaP_of this Back to QuerX New Tax_Coll..ector (�uestion�Comment about this Parcel Results Search Information Parcel 16/29/15/76482/002 /0010 Data Current as of August 24, 2008 .[4:27 pm Wednesday August 27] Vacant Property Owner, Address, and Sales Print Property-Use: 0 ROMPON'S & BASKIN'S CORR MAP OF CSWY BUS. DIST THAT PART OF BLK 2 LYING W OF DREW ST . *_ _Cl ck_._here_for short legal_ ** 2008 Exemptions Homestead: No Use: 0% Ownership: 0% Tax Exempt: 0% Government: Yes Institutional: No Agricultural: $0 Historic: $0 2008 Value. 2008 Tax Information Comparable Sales Value:: $0 Tax District: CWD Just/Market Value: $635,700 Proposed Millage: 21.5626 Assessed Value/ SOH Cap: $635,700 Proposed Non Ad Valorem $ 00 History Taxable Value: $0 Assessments: A. significant taxable value increase may Proposed Taxes: $.00 occur when sold. Click)) e re. for details. Proposed Taxes without Save -Our- $.00 Homes cap: Proposed Taxes without any $13,707.30 exemptions: Owner/Mailing Sale Date Book/Page Price _Q /U V/1 Address Property Address No Recent Sales CLEARWATER, CITY OF Plat Year Plat Book/Page(s) ATTN: CASH & INVESTMENTS MGR 1960 057/ 001- 002 PO BOX 4748 CLEARWATER FL 33758 -4748 Parcel Information Book/Page: Land Use: Municipal, _0.0927/0009 other tha... (&9) Census Tract: Evacuation Zone: A 259.01 Seawall: Land Use Vacant Commercial(10) Land Information Frontage: Norte Land Size Unit Value 40.00 View: Units Method 19,680.59 S http: / /www.pcpao.org /general _ vadet.php ?pn = 1529167648200200100 8/27/2008 + - Welcome to VDB on the Web 0 Page 1 of I y - r �cm� ■ Photography: 2007 Color Transparency (0.0- In Theme Description This is the default set. It has no data layers, just linework. All of the map . layers are black. http: / /vdb.pcpao.org/vdb.php 8/27/2008 Property Appraiser General Info i ation: 16/29/15/20358/001 /0040 Card Interactive_MaD of this ColnmrableSales Backto_Ouery New Tax Collector. parcel Listing Results Search Information. 16/29/15/20358/001 /0040 Building 1 Page 1 of 5 Question/Comment about this parcel, Data Cut ent as of August 24, 2008 [4:28 pm Wednesday August 27] Nonresidential Property Owner, Address, and Sales Print Offices Property Use: 413 DAVEY'S, JOHN R. RESUB BLK A, PART OF LOTS 2, 3, 4 & 5 & UNPLATTED TRACT ON W DESC FROM NE COR OF SD BLK A TH SO1D22'45'E 43.12 FT TH W 354.40FT FOR POB TH S 174.82FT TH E 23.61FT TH SO1D22'45'E 56FT TH E 320FT TO W R/W OF OSCEOLA AVE TH S 297FT(S) ALG R/W TO N R/W OF PIERCE ST PER O.R. 2059/493 TH W 754FT (S) TO W R/W OF PIERCE BLVD TH S'LY 48FT(S) ALG R/W TO MOST E'LY COR OF R/W DESC IN O.R. 11197 PG 2056 TH CUR RT RAD 224.63 FT ARC 61.33FT CB N62DO9' 35'W 61.14FT TH CUR RT RAD 224.63FT ARC 25.69FT CB N51D03'43'W 25.69FT TH CUR RT RAD 224.63FT ARC 9.43FT CB N46D34'59'W 9.43FT TO MOST E'LY COR OF PIERCE 100 CONDO TH CUR RT RAD 224.63FT ARC 118.17FT CB N30D56'52'W 116.81FT TH W 37.86FT TH NO3D33'00'E 40.08FT TH W 225FT TH N 20 FT TH W 209.64FT TH N45DW 27.83FT TH W 61 AFT TO NW COR OF SD CONDO TH N'LY 95 FT(S) TH E'LY 520FT(S) TO SEAWALL TH N'LY 348FT(S) ALG SEAWALL TO BRIDGE TH NE'LY 40FT TO S'LY R/W OF CLEVELAND ST TH SE'LY 635 FT(S) ALG CLEVELAND ST TO POB LESS R/W FOR PIERCE BLVD (SEE D.B. 113/176,361/249, 668/409,1417/329 & 1418/23,1493/403 & O.R. 991/284, TIIF 22686A O.R. 1105/162 & 16016/175) Click here for short legal ** 2008 Exemptions Homestead: No Use: 0% Ownership: 0% Tax Exempt: 0% Government: Yes Institutional: No Agricultural: $0 Historic: $0 2008 Value 2008 Tax Information Comparable Sales Value:: $0 Tax District: CWD F.S. 553.844 Just/Market Value: Proposed Millage: 21.5626 $23,489,400 Proposed Non Ad Valorem Assessed Value/ SOH Cap_$23,489,400 Assessments: $•00 History Taxable Value: $0 Proposed Taxes: $.00 A significant taxable value increase may Proposed Taxes without Save -Our- $•00 occur when sold. Click here for details. Homes cap: Proposed Taxes without any $506,493.00 exemptions: Owner /Mailing Property Address Sale Date Book/Page Price Q/U VII Address No Recent Sales http: / /www.pcpao.org/ general_ nadet .php ?pn = 1529162035800100401 8/27/2008 Property Appraiser General Inf ation: 16/29/15/20358/001 /0040 Carb CLEARWATER, CITY OF ATTN CASH & INVESTMENTS MGR 112 S OSCEOLA AVE PO BOX 4748 CLEARWATER FL 33758 -4748 Parcel Information Book/Page: Land Use: Municipal, 00113/01.76 other tha_(89) Census Tract: .00 Evacuation Zone: A Plat Year 1896 Page 2 of 5 Plat Book/Page(s) OHl/ 087 http: / /www.pcpao.org/general _ nadet.php ?pn= 1529162035800100401 8/27/2008 S 'Property Appraiser General Inf ation: 16/29/15/20358/001 /0040 Car Seawall: Land Information Frontage: None Land Use Land Size Municipal, other than parks, recreational areas. 89 Rivers and Lakes, Submer eg d Lauds(95) Structural Elements Foundation: Special Footing Floor System: Structural Slab Exterior Wall: Concrete Block/Stucco Roof Frame: Reinforced Concrete Roof Cover: Built -up Composition Height Factor: 0 Floor Finish: Carpet Combination Interior Finish: Drywall Party wall: None Structural Frame: Concrete Reinforced Cabinet & Mill: Average Quality: Average Heating & Air: Heating & cooling Package Electric: Average Bath Tile: Floor and Wall Fixtures: 24 Total Units: 0 Year Built: 1966 Effective Age: 14 Other Depreciation: 0 Functional Depreciation: 0 Economic Depreciation: 0 Page 3 of 5 View: Unit Units Method Value 70.00 383,650.00 S 1,000.00 No Building Drawing for this card 1.34 A http: / /www.pcpao.org/general _ nadet.php ?pn= 1529162035800100401 8/27/2008 ' Property Appraiser General Inf ation: 16/29/15/20358/001 /0040 Carj, Sub Area information Page 4 of 5 Description Building Finished Ft2 Gross Area Ft2 Factor Effective Ft2 Base Area 24,614 24,614 1.00 24,614 Total Building Finished SF: 24,614 Total Gross SF: 24,614 Total Effective SF: 24,614 http: / /www.pcpao.org /general _ nadet.php ?pn = 1529162035800100401 8/27/2008 Nonresidential Extra Features Description Dimensions Value/Unit Units Total NewValue Depreciated Value Year Asphalt 10X4694 $1.75 30000 $52,500.00 $52,500.00 Unknown Patio/Deck 1OX188 $12.00 1188 $14,260.00 $6,560.00 1986 Elevator 2500LB $30,000.00 2 $60,000.00 $37,200.00 1994 Elevator Stop ESTOP $3,500.00 6 $21,000.00 $13,020.00 1994 Fire Sprinkler 24614SF $2.00 24614 $49,230.00 $41,350.00 1997 Fence 490LF $5.00 490 $2,450.00 $980.00 1982 Shed 45X20 $20.00 900 $18,000.00 $7,200.00 1967 Tennis Court $25,000.00 4 $100,000.00 $77,000.00 1999 http: / /www.pcpao.org /general _ nadet.php ?pn = 1529162035800100401 8/27/2008 ` 'Welcome to VDB on the Web FZ... qyT, �Pan TG0 vu�,ctow Tu=1 de Aerial Photography: 2007 Color Transparency (0.0- n 1.0 ) 1— Theme Description This is the default set. It has no data layers, just linework. All of the map layers are black. 0 Page 1 of 1 17d''°_1�.AIPlZ'iPl� �_- � � ri�� __- is �, ��:•� y.,,a'' 3 n a -,M, 71 �-44 - J1, .c ,r i, Y i` http: / /vdb.pcpao.org/vdb.php 8/27/2008 CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY FLAG SVC 503 CLEVELAND ST CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 4007 PINELLAS COUNTY 315 COURT ST CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5165 CLEARWATER, CITY OF PO BOX 4748 CLEARWATER FL 33758 - 4748 CLEARWATER, CITY OF PO BOX 4748 CLEARWATER FL. 33758 - 4748 MOREHOUSE, JASON S GOLD DREDGE LLC 1100 N ST STE IC SACRAMENTO CA 95814 - 5634 CAFE CONCERTO INC 800 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 903 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 3002 HICKOK INVESTMENTS LLC 1647 SAND KEY ESTATE CT CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2959 PINELLAS COUNTY 315 COURT ST CLEARWATER F1- 33756 - 5165 PINELLAS COUNTY 315 COURT ST CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5165 le PINELLAS COUNTY 315 COURT ST CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5165 CLEARWATER BLUFF ONE LLC 4200 W CYPRESS ST STE 444 TAMPA FL 33607 - 4168 CLEARWATER BLUFF ONE LLC 4200 W CYPRESS ST STE 444 TAMPA FL 33607 - 4168 WATERS EDGE ONE LLC 4200 W CYPRESS ST STE 444 TAMPA FL 33607 - 4168 FIRST CHURCH OF CHRIST SCIENTI 210 TURNER ST CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5213 OSCEOLA CLEVELAND LLC 413 CLEVELAND ST CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 4004 M A M C FLORIDA SPORTSDANCE LL 200 BISCAYNE BLVD # 1000 MIAMI FL 33131 - PEACE MEMORIAL PRESBYTERIAN CH 110 S FORT HARRISON AVE CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5107 CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY FLAG SVC 503 CLEVELAND ST CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 4007 a PINELLAS COUNTY 315 COURT ST CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5165 CLEARWATER BLUFF ONE LLC 4200 W CYPRESS ST STE 444 TAMPA FL 33607 - 4168 CLEARWATER, CITY OF PO BOX 4748 CLEARWATER FL 33758 - 4748 CLEARWATER, CITY OF PO BOX 4748 CLEARWATER FL 33758 - 4748 TSAFATINOS, TERRY 667 SNUG IS CLEARWATER FL 33767 -1830 ONE STOPPE SHOPPE INC 411 CLEVELAND ST CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 4004 CAPEL PROPERTIES 870 LANTERN WAY CLEARWATER FL 33765 - PEACE MEMORIAL PRESBYTERIAN CH 110 S FORT HARRISON AVE CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5107 PINELLAS COUNTY 315 COURT ST CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5165 PINELLAS COUNTY CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY 315 COURT ST RELIGIOU RELIGIOU CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5165 319 S GARDEN AVE 319 S GARDEN AVE CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5423 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5423 CHURCH OF SCI.ENTOLOGY RELIGIOU 319 S GARDEN AVE CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5423 KOCHAN, JOAN R 100 PIERCE ST # 109 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5114 MATHIS, DAVID L & BONNIE K JOI 11515 TORREY RD FENTON MI 48430 - 9631 SCHENKELBERG,CATHY TRUST 100 PIERCE ST # 310 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5102 CORR, DIANE C 100 PIERCE ST # 304 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 51.41 WU, STEVE KUO, LUCIA 100 PIERCE ST # 307 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 51.02 COPPELMAN, JEFFREY M 100 PIERCE ST # 3 10 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5102 WINTEREGG, GREGORY A WINTEREGG, SANDRA K 418 BUTTONWOOD LN LARGO FL 33770 - 4046 COLON, LUIS A JR COLON, JUDITH 11571 POPES HEAD VIEW LN FAIRFAX VA 22030 - 5451 FARCA,RAQUEL BOSQUE MOCTEZUMA 167 HERRADURA HUIXQUILUCAN EDO 52784 00002 - MEXICO @�IERCE 100 CONDO ASSN INC 100 PIERCE ST CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5156 TSAMBARLIS, EMMANUEL KARPINSKI, ANNA 100 PIERCE ST # 201 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - HALSEY, LEIZA 100 PIERCE ST # 209 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5158 MATHERS, ALBERT J MATHERS, FUMEI PO BOX 2574 CLEARWATER FL 33757 - 2574 CARSON, MICHAEL D CARSON, NORMA K 318 BREEMAN CIR LAFAYETTE LA 70508 - 5955 COHEN, LAURA 100 PIERCE ST # 308 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5102 CASSANO, RAYMOND P 100 PIERCE ST # 401 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5115 MOORE, ANGELICA 100 PIERCE ST # 404 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5142 PETERSON, ELIZABETH M LIVING T 6459 WYDOWN BLVD ST LOUIS MO 63105 - 2214 BOURIKAS, CHRISTINA BOURIKAS, CONSTANTINE 100 PIERCE ST # 410 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5142 *BOOCOCK, GERRY T THE BOOCOCK, REVA J THE 100 PIERCE ST # 108 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5114 PIERCE 100 # 202 TRUST PO BOX 15722 CLEARWATER FL 33766 - 5722 KILGO, AMELIA A PO BOX 15722 CLEARWATER FL 33766 - 5722 MELLISH, KATHY F 100 PIERCE ST # 303 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5141 PREMOLI, IOLANDA VIA SAVONA 12 MILAN 20144 00003 - ITALY GIORGIO, ROBERT P GIORGIO, SHIRLEY D 2757 RAVINE PL NORTH BELLMORE NY 11710 - 1414 REGNI, GERALD J JR 937 CHRISTIAN ST PHILADELPHIA PA 19147 - 3832 DI MARCO, JAMES V BRAADT, ELIZABETH M 100 PIERCE ST # 405 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5142 YETTER, LISA L ALTINTOP, JOHN 10274 KALUA DR SUNLAND CA 91040 - 1515 BARBEE, CHARLES M BARBEE, SUSAN B 100 PIERCE ST # 501 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5101 WILSON, WARD AUSTIN SR VARGAS, NANCY G 100 PIERCE ST # 502 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5101 SCHOFNER, VIRGINIA M 100 PIERCE ST # 506 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5101 FINK, HEDWIG SCHNEIDERGRUBER, MANUELA 100 PIERCE ST # 509 CLEARWATER FL 3 3756 - 5128 MILLER, LAWRENCE T MILLER, CHARLEN E A 1400 LILAC LN ADDISON IL 60101 - 5743 MATHEIS, HILDEGARD 100 PIERCE ST # 605 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5151 KAMPH, GLORIA A KAMPH, JOCELYN SYDELL 100 PIERCE ST # 608 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 51.16 ALEMIS, ALEXANDER 100 PIERCE ST # 701 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5117 DESAI, VARSHA S 7593 ARALIA WAY LARGO FL 33777 - 4910 KOKER, AHMET KOKER,SUZAN 100 PIERCE ST # 707 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5159 TURNER, TERRY S 100 PIERCE ST # 71.0 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 51.59 • IOTROWSKI, CATHY THE *GOOD, EARL W 100 PIERCE ST # 503 GOOD, JOAVA M CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5101 1047 E 13200 S DRAPER UT 84020 - 9399 MENKHAUS, EDWARD M MENKHAUS, AMY L 100 PIERCE ST # 507 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5101 MATHERS, ALBERT J MATHERS, FUMEI 8 EVONAIRE CIR BELLEAIR FL 33756 - 1603 DRUMRIGHT, DOLORES F 3222 SAN PEDRO ST CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 3537 CORREA, JORGE MARTINEZ, LILIANA 3200 COCONUT GROVE DR CORAL GABLES FL 33134 - 6827 BOCK, THOMAS L BOCK, BARBARA R 100 PIERCE ST # 609 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5116 JACKSON, WARNER LOVE - JACKSON, ALICIA 7901 N BERWYN GLENDALE WI 53209 - 1809 SASNETT, ANNIE K 100 PIERCE ST # 705 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5159 MARTIN, PATRICK A MARTIN, ELENA 8960 CAMINO DEL AVION GRANITE BAY CA 95746 - 5845 KUO, LUCIA WU, STEVE 887 SWISS TRAILS RD DUARTE CA 91010 - 2180 DOKUMACI, OZDEMIR DOKUMACI, AYHAN 100 PIERCE ST # 508 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5101 SPATUZZI, FRANK L SPATUZZI, INGE 100 PIERCE ST # 601 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5151 SNYDER, CHARLES 1000 ESCALSON AVE # 3054 SUNNYVALE CA 94085 - MC PHEE, A LLOYD MC PHEE, DIANE 100 PIERCE ST # 607 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5116 WELLS, DEBORAH 2919 WEST BAY DR BELLEAIR BLUFFS FL 33770 - 2621 LUNDGREN, RICHARD W 100 PIERCE ST # 703 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5117 FITZSIMONS, BETTINA R 100 PIERCE ST # 706 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 51.59 MELENDEZ, JORGE A MELENDEZ, DIANE M 4510 OLD ORCHARD DR TAMPA FL 33618 - 8654 DABBAH, SALOMON DABBAH, ALICIA CASA DE LA MONEDA # 106 COL 10 DE ADRIL DF CP 11250 00002 - MILOVIC, NENAD MILOVIC, MARLISE 100 PIERCE ST # 803 CLEARWATER ILL 33756 - 5152 ST CLAIR, ARLENE F TRUST 120 KERCHEVAL GROSSE POINTE FARMS MI 48236-3619 SUPLEE, SUSAN W TRUST 400 ROBERTS RD BRYN MAWR PA 19010 - 1136 FERNANDEZ, SALVADOR 411 CLEVELAND ST # 169 CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 4004 ROSE, GLENDA 5060 WOODLAND DR LEWISTON NY 14092 - 1914 . VAN ROMER, GARRY K VAN ROMER, HELEN C 203 CROSS CREEK DR SENECA SC 29678 - 1 148 D K S SOUTH LLC ONE PINCKNEY SOUTH ST 2ND FL MADISON WI 53703 - 51.60 SGROI, JENNIFER A SGROI, ELIZABETH A 75 HILLTOP CT W SENECA NY 14224 - 4210 SCHEER, ALAN C SCHEER, JOYCE R 100 PIERCE ST # 1007 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5162 OJOYCE, GERTRUDE M HURLEY, MAUREEN J POA 501 MANDALAY AVE # 902 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1713 FAYEK M & NADIA L BARSOOM REVO BARSOOM, FAYEK M THE 100 PIERCE ST # 807 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5152 INANC, DOGAN INANC, MERAL 100 PIERCE ST # 810 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5161 RIVIERE, LUCILE F 100 PIERCE ST # 903 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5153 BRAADT, PAUL BRAADT, GEORGETTE 1028 S CEDARCREST BLVD ALLENTOWN PA 18103 - 5444 ALMSTEAD, RICHARD E ALMSTEAD, JEAN 31 ALLEGRA CT WHITE PLAINS NY 10603 - 1534 BEILHART, ROBERT W 294 SPOTTIS WOODE CT CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5268 ASSAAD, HANI A 100 PIERCE ST # 1005 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5162 MARKS, JOHN L 6615 N LEROY AVE LINCOLNWOOD IL 60712 - 3201 •GLANVILLE, THOMAS O 100 PIERCE ST # 805 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5152 WILLEBRANDS, ELSA M 213 AVA RD TORONTO ON M6C 1 W9 00001 - CANADA DOB1N, SHARYN REVOCABLE TRUST 4 ORCHARD WAY WARREN NJ 07059 - 5056 GAILZAID, VICKI BENTHIEN, SIMONE 100 PIERCE ST # 904 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5153 TETZLAFF & VISCO REVOCABLE FAM TETZLAFF, TERRY JOEL THE 100 PIERCE ST # 907 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5118 ALAIN, MARC 55 JEAN - TALON ST W 2ND FL MONTREAL QC H2R 2W8 00001 CANADA KOTSIOPOULOS, PETER J KOTSIOPOULOS, JOHN G 591 BRAEMAR LN BARRINGTON IL 60010 - 6517 ARNOLD, B G ARNOLD, FRANCES COUNTRY CLUB VIEW MIDDLESBORO KY 40965 - COYLE, JEFFERY MARK COYLE, NICHOLAS WESLEY 100 PIERCE ST # 1009 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5162 CHRISTOPHER, CHRISTINE F TRELA, CHRISTINE M FREDERICKS, CLYDE F 100 PIERCE ST # 1010 4101 PARAMOUNT BLVD # 94 100 PIERCE ST # 1102 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5162 PICO RIVERA CA 90660 - 6090 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 51.54 HARTMAN, DEBORAH REHMAN, GLORIA V 100 PIERCE ST # 1103 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5154 SIMON, CHARLES SIMON, MARINA 100 PIERCE ST # 1 106 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 51.54 MONTERO, ART WESLY MONTERO, LOURDES 2350 FOOTHILL BLVD # 16 LA CANADA CA 91011 - ELIAS, EDWARD 1537 CANOPY OAKS BLVD PALM HARBOR FL 34683 - 6162 WOLFAARDT, HEIDI 100 PIERCE ST # 1206 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5155 NADIR, SHELIA 34 MEDALIST RD WILLOWDALE ON M2P IY5 00001- CANADA HOEKSTRA, JODI L HOEKSTRA, BURTON R 4501 SUNFLOWER RIDGE DR NE ADA MI 49301 - URBANEK, ANTHONY P URBANEK, ANN M 227 WINDWARD PS E CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2237 DUGGAN, ROBERT W DUGGAN, PATRICIA 100 PIERCE ST # PH 10 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5166 ISSARAFIAN, STEVEN A 100 PIERCE ST # 1104 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5154 ROTEN, REX A 100 PIERCE ST # 1107 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5154 NEWELL, MARGARET C 837 WISCONSIN AVE PALM HARBOR FL 34683 - 4250 TARBERT, JEFFREY J CAFRUNY, MADALYN B 402 LITTLE FALLS ST FALLS CHURCH VA 22046 - 2637 LOFGREN, CLIFFORD E LOFGREN, FRANCINE T 100 PIERCE ST # 1207 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5155 WELLS, DEBORAH 2917 WEST BAY DR BELLEAIR BLUFFS FL 33770 - 2621 WAGENVOORD, DAVID WAGENVOORD, LOLA 2360 NE COACHMAN RD CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 2216 YETTER, LISA L ALTINTOP, JOHN 10274 KALUA DR SUNLAND CA 91040 - 1515 PINELLAS COUNTY 315 COURT ST CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5165 • URBANEK, ANTHONY P URBANEK, ANN MARIE 100 PIERCE ST # 1105 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5154 ROTEN, RANDY M ROTEN, MERLE 1408 N CEDER HILL RD CEDER HILL TX 75104 - 5204 PREWETT, LUCAS PREWETT, AGNES J 100 PIERCE ST # 1201 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5155 CLEMENTS, KAREN L K 100 PIERCE ST # 1205 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5155 ALEXANDER, WILLIAM 100 PIERCE ST # 1208 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5114 CLARK, JAMES C CLARK, MICHAEL C 100 PIERCE ST # PHI CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5140 KOCHAN, JANE L 100 PIERCE ST # 1305 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5156 FRISBY, MICHAEL B TRUST FRISBY, MICHAEL B THE 100 PIERCE ST # 1309 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5156 PINELLAS COUNTY 315 COURT ST CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5165 CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY CLEARWATER, CITY OF RELIGIOU FLAG SVC PO BOX 4748 319 S GARDEN AVE 503 CLEVELAND ST CLEARWATER FL 33758 - 4748 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5423 CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 4007 CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY FLAG SER 503 CLEVELAND ST CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 4007 CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY FLAG SER 503 CLEVELAND ST CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 4007 CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY FLAG SER 503 CLEVELAND ST CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 4007 CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY FLAG SER 503 CLEVELAND ST CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 4007 CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY FLAG SER 503 CLEVELAND ST CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 4007 CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY FLAG SER 503 CLEVELAND ST CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 4007 CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY FLAG SER 503 CLEVELAND ST CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 4007 CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY FLAG SER 503 CLEVELAND ST CLEARWATER FL. 33755 - 4007 CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY FLAG SER 503 CLEVELAND ST CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 4007 SALINAS, MARY THE CHURCH SCIENTOLOGY RELIGIOUS 503 CLEVELAND ST CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 4007 • CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY FLAG SER 503 CLEVELAND ST CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 4007 CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY FLAG SER 503 CLEVELAND ST CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 4007 CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY FLAG SER 503 CLEVELAND ST CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 4007 CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY FLAG SER 503 CLEVELAND ST CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 4007 CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY FLAG SER 503 CLEVELAND ST CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 4007 CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY FLAG SER 503 CLEVELAND ST CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 4007 CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY FLAG SER 503 CLEVELAND ST CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 4007 CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY FLAG SER 503 CLEVELAND ST CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 4007 CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY FLAG SER 503 CLEVELAND ST CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 4007 CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY RELIGIOU 319 S GARDEN AVE CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5423 • CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY FLAG SER 503 CLEVELAND ST CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 4007 CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY FLAG SER 503 CLEVELAND ST CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 4007 CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY . FLAG SER 503 CLEVELAND ST CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 4007 CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY FLAG SER 503 CLEVELAND ST CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 4007 CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY FLAG SER 503 CLEVELAND ST CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 4007 CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY FLAG SER 503 CLEVELAND ST CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 4007 CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY FLAG SER 503 CLEVELAND ST CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 4007 CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY FLAG SER 503 CLEVELAND ST CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 4007 TRIANGLES A LAND LLC 305 N FORT HARRISON AVE CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3923 CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY FLAG SVC 503 CLEVELAND ST CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 4007 CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY FLAG SER 503 CLEVELAND ST CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 4007 ALBANIAN ISLAMIC CULTURAL CENT 225 N FT HARRISON AVE CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 4022 CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY FLAG SVC 503 CLEVELAND ST CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 4007 ARNOLD BROWN PROPERTIES 311 PARK PLACE BLVD # 600 CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 4925 CLEARWATER, CITY OF PO BOX 4748 CLEARWATER FL 33758 - 4748 MAINSTREET CLEARWATER DEV 206 S BRAND BLVD GLENDALE CA 91204 - 1310 MAINSTREET CLEARWATER DEV 206 S BRAND BLVD GLENDALE CA 91204 - 1310 TSAFATINOS, ANNA 667 SNUG IS CLEARWATER FL 3' )767 - 1.830 JANNELLI, GILBERT G 909 S FORT HARRISON AVE CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3903 STRIANGLE OLD BAY HOLDINGS LLC 501 N FORT HARRISON AVE CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3906 CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY RELIGIOU 503 CLEVELAND ST CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 4007 JANNELLI, GILBERT G 909 S FORT HARRISON AVE CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3903 ARNOLD BROWN PROPERTIES 311 PARK PLACE BLVD # 600 CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 4925 CLEARWATER, CITY OF PO BOX 4748 CLEARWATER FL 33758 - 4748 MAINSTREET CLEARWATER DEV 206 S BRAND BLVD GLENDALE CA 91204 - 1310 GOUDREAULT, JOSEE 24 -28 N FT HARRISON CLEARWATER FL 33755 - WHTBUFF INC 34 N FT HARRISON AVE CLEARWATER FL 33755 - WHTBUFF INC 34 N FT HARRISON AVE CLEARWATER FL 33755 - •JAMESCHRIS CORP 431 GULFVIEW BLVD CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2508 302 -308 N OSCEOLA PROPERTIES L 305 N FT HARRISON AVE CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3923 400 CLEVELAND 206 S BRAND BLVD GLENDALE CA 91204 - 1310 CHETKIN, LEONARD CHETKIN, MARY E 701 WASHINGTON ST KEY WEST FL 33040 - 4732 400 CLEVELAND 206 S BRAND BLVD GLENDALE CA 91204 - 1310 MAINSTREET CLEARWATER DEV 206 S BRAND BLVD GLENDALE CA 91204 - 1310 JANNELLI, GILBERT G 909 S FORT HARRISON AVE CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3903 JANNELLI, GILBERT G 909 S FORT HARRISON AVE CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3903 WHTBUFF INC 34 N FT HARRISON AVE CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 400 CLEVELAND KWALL, LOUIS CHAMBERS, DIANNE B 206 S BRAND BLVD KWALL, JEAN H CHAMBERS, JAMES D GLENDALE CA 91204 - 1 31.0 133 N FORT HARRISON AVE 820 ELDORADO AVE CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 4020 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1312 2 J W GROUP LLC 404 MARTIN LUTHER KING JR AVE CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5719 GIRONELLA, BONNIE R 430 OLD OAK CIR PALM HARBOR FL 34683 - 5866 CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY RELIGIOU C/O HUGER, MARY SALINAS THE 319 S GARDEN AVE CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY FLAG SVC 503 CLEVELAND ST CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 4007 CLEARWATER, CITY OF PO BOX 4748 CLEARWATER FL 33758 - 4748 *CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY FLAG SVC 503 CLEVELAND ST CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 4007 CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY FLAG SVC 503 CLEVELAND ST CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 4007 CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY FLAG SVC 503 CLEVELAND ST CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 4007 CLEARWATER, CITY OF PO BOX 4748 CLEARWATER FL 33758 - 4748 *GIRONELLA, BONNIE R 430 OLD OAK CIR PALM HARBOR FL 34683 - 5866 CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY FLAG SVC 503 CLEVELAND ST CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 4007 CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY FLAG SER 503 CLEVELAND ST CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 4007 CLEARWATER, CITY OF PO BOX 4748 CLEARWATER FL 33758 - 4748 CITY OF CLEARWATER NOTICE OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD PUBLIC HEARINGS The Community Development Board of the City of Clearwater, Florida, will hold public hearings on Tuesday, October 21, 2008, beginning at 1:00 p.m., in the City Council Chambers, in City Hall, 3rd floor, 112 South Osceola Ave, Clearwater, Florida, to consider the following requests: NOTE: All persons wishing to address an item need to be present at the BEGINNING of the meeting. Those cases that are not contested by the applicant, staff, neiahborin2 property owners, etc. will be placed on a consent agenda and approved by a single vote at the beQjnninjZ of the meeting. 1. (Cont'd from 9- 16 -08) BVG Acquisition Inc are requesting Flexible Development approval for the redevelopment of the overall 31.12 acre - property zoned Commercial (C) District, Office (0) District and proposed Medium High Density Residential (MHDR) District (companion rezoning Case No. REZ2008- 07007) to permit a total of 229 attached dwellings (Independent Living Units) (73 units existing to remain; 156 units proposed), a total of 40 nursing home beds (proposed) and a total of 170 beds of assisted living facility (94 beds existing to remain; 76 beds proposed); (A) In the Commercial (C) District with a lot area of 2.45 acres, a lot width of 200 feet along Gulf to Bay Blvd (north) and a total of 210 ft along Cross Blvd, a front (north) setback along Gulf to Bay Blvd of 4 ft (to existing sign) and 28 ft (to existing pavement), a front (east) setback along Cross Blvd of one -foot (to existing pavement), a front (north) setback along Cross Blvd of 25 ft (to proposed guardhouse), a side (east) setback of 5 feet (to existing pavement), a side (west) setback of 2 feet (to existing pavement), a side (north) setback of zero feet (to existing pavement) and a building height of 81 ft (to roof deck of existing assisted living facility building), as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project in the Commercial (C) District, under the provisions of Sec. 2- 704.C; (B) In the proposed Medium High Density Residential (MHDR) District with a lot area of 28.33 acres, a lot width along Sky Harbor Dr. of 282 ft, a reduction to the front (:vest) setback along S i ua;-hnr Dr. from 25 to 21 ft (to existing building), µa reduction to the side (east) setback from 10 to 5 ft (to existing pavement), a reduction to the side (west) setback at the southeast corner of the adjacent nursing home parcel from 10 to 5 ft (to proposed pavement), an increase to building height from 30 to 82 ft (to top of roof of proposed building) and a reduction to the required number of parking spaces from 583 to 426 parking spaces, as a Residential Infill Project under the provisions of Sec. 2- 304.G; and (C) Reductions to perimeter buffers along Cross Blvd (east) from 10 ft to one -foot (to existing pavement), along the east side from 7 to 5 ft (to existing pavement), along the west side from 5 to 2 ft (to existing pavement), along the north side from 10 ft to zero ft (to existing pavement) and at the southeast corner of the adjacent nursing home parcel from 10 ft to 5 ft (to proposed pavement), as a Comprehensive Landscape Program under the provisions of Sec. 3- 1202.G. Proposed Use: 229 attached dwellings (Independent Living Units) (73 units existing to remain; 156 units proposed), a total of 40 nursing home beds (proposed) and a total of 170 beds of assisted living facility (94 beds existing to remain; 76 beds proposed) at 2855 Gulf to Bay Boulevard, Baskin's Replat Resub pt of lot 2 desc from NE cor of lot 1 TH E 60FT & S 190FT for the POB TH E 135.2FT. Assigned Planner: Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Planner 111. FLD2008- 05012 2. K & P Clearwater Estate, LLC is requesting (1) Flexible Development approval to Tenninate the Status of a Nonconformity for density (200 overnight accommodation units; where 137 overnight accommodation units are permitted today) within the Tourist District, under the provisions of Sec. 6- 109.C; (2) Flexible Development approval to permit a 450 -unit Overnight Accommodation use (through an increase of the permitted density of 250 overnight accommodation • t units from the density pool created pursuant to Beach by Design), with a lot area of 119,856 sq. ft (2.75 acres), a lot width of approximately 545 ft along Coronado Dr. and 227 ft along proposed 2 "' St., a front (east along Coronado Dr.) setback of zero ft (to building and pavement), a front (south along proposed 2 "d St.) setback of 18.83 ft (to building), a front (west and north along S. Gulfview Blvd.) setback of zero ft (to building), a building height of 150 ft (to roof deck) and either 463 valet - only parking spaces or 455 valet -only parking spaces with 8 public parking spaces at 1.028 or 1.011 parking spaces per hotel room, respectively, as well as the allowance of a two -year time frame to submit for a building permit, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Sec. 2- 803.C; (3) To reduce the required foundation landscaping along Coronado Dr. and S. Gulfview Blvd from 5 to zero ft (to building and pavement), as a Comprehensive Landscape Program, under the provisions of Sec. 3- 1202.G; and (4) Vacation of a portion of S. Gulfview Blvd (former bridge landing). Proposed Use: Overnight accommodation use of a total of 450 rooms (163.6 rooms /acre on total site) and a maximum of 37,000 sq. ft (0.31 FAR on total site) of amenities accessory to the hotel at a height of 150 ft (to roof deck) at 100 Coronado Dr, 201, 215 & 219 S. Gulfview Blvd., Lot 1, Blk A of Columbia Sub, Lloyd White Skinner Sub Lots 44 -47 Incl & Lots 90 -93 Incl, 48 -52 Incl, Lot 98, Lots 53, 54, 99 & 100, prt of Gulfview Blvd, prt of lot 101, prt of lot 55, prt of lot 102, lots 94 -97 incl, prt of vac prt of 151 Ave., part of vac pt of Coronado, and vac pt of Gulfview Blvd. Assigned Planner: Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Planner III. FLD2008 -05013 3. James P. & Joyce P. Gills are requesting Flexible Development approval for a new single family detached dwelling within the Low Density Residential (LDR) District with a lot area of 53,799 sq ft, (33,977 sq ft Open Space/Recreation (OSR) and 19,822 sq ft LDR), a lot width of 121 ft, a reduction to the side (north) setback from 15 ft to 3 ft (to pavement) and 5 ft (to building), a reduction to the side (south) setback from 15 ft to 10 ft (to building), a reduction to the rear (west) setback from 15 ft to zero feet (to raised pool & building) from the Coastal Construction Control Line (CCCL) and an increase in the maximum building height from 30 ft 34 ft (to midpoint of pitched roof) as a Residential Infill Redevelopment Project as per Community Development Code Section 2- 104.D. Proposed Use: Detached Dwelling at 1160 Mandalay Point Rd., Mandalay Point Sub 151 Add Lots 16, 16A, 17 & 17A. Assigned Planner: A. Scott Kurleman, Planner III. FLD2008 -08025 4. Salt Block 57 LLC is requesting (1) Termination of Status of Nonconformity for density (217 overnight accommodation units (as established by Cases FLD2005- 01005, FLD2005 -05047 and FLD2007- 11034); where 93 overnight accommodation units are permitted, today), under the provisions of Sec.6 -109; (2) Flexible Development approval to permit a 230 -room overnight accommodation use (hotel) in the Tourist (T) District with a lot area of 81,450 sq ft/1.87 acres zoned Tourist District (2.45 total acres; 0.58 acres of total acreage zoned Open Space/Recreation District), a lot width of 236 ft, a front (east) setback of 2.5 ft (to building) and zero ft (to pavement), a side (north) setback of zero ft (to building) from the Coastal Construction Control Line (CCCL) and to permit a sidewalk 10 ft seaward of the CCCL, a side (south) setback of 16 ft (to building), 1.5 ft (to pavement) and zero ft (to privacy wall), a rear (west) setback of two ft (to building) from the CCCL and to permit concrete patios 13 ft seaward of the CCCL, a building height* of 150 ft above Base Flood Elevation (BFE) to top of roof deck and 296 valet -only parking spaces at 1.286 parking spaces per hotel room, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Sec.2- 803.C, and three driveways where the two northernmost driveways are spaced 110 ft apart and the two southernmost driveways are spaced 18 ft apart, where 125 ft is required by Sec.3 -102 and approval of a two -year development order; and (3) including the Transfer of Development Rights of eight total dwelling units (being converted to 13 overnight accommodation units) previously approved and transferred under TDR2005- 05022, including four dwelling units from 557 and 579 Cyprus Ave. one dwelling unit from 625 -627 Bay Esplanade and three dwelling l • !• units from 667 Bay Esplanade, under the provisions of Sec. 4 -1402. Proposed Use: Overnight accommodation use of a total of 230 rooms at 430 S. Gulfview Blvd. Lloyd White - Skinner Sub Lots 33, 34 & 35 & Pt of Lot 36 and Subm Land on W Per O.R. 765/542. Assigned Planner: Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Planner III. FLD2008 -08024 5. City of Clearwater is requesting Flexible Development approval to permit a marina for 127 slips in the Downtown (D) District with a reduction to the side (north) setback from 135.7 to 19 feet, a reduction to the side (south) setback from 135.7 to 7.67 feet and an increase to the maximum width from 75% of the lot width (1,017.7 feet) to 109.8% of the lot width (1,490 feet), under the provisions of Sections 2- 903.H, 3- 601.C.3 and 3 -603. Proposed Use: City Downtown Marina for 127 boat slips at 210 Drew Street, 16 -29 -15 M & B 21.10, 21.11, Jeffords & Smoyers 151 Add Lots 1, 4 & 5 of all Vac Sunset Ct. R/W & Lot 2 Ext to Seawall Less Drew St, Rompon's & Baskin's Corr Map of Cswy Bus Dist, Part of Blk 2, John R. Davey's Resub Blk A, Part of Lots 2 -5 & Unplatted tract on West. Assigned Planner: Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Planner III. FLD2008- 08026 Interested parties may appear and be heard at the hearing or file written notice of approval or objection with the Planning Director or City Clerk prior to the hearing. Any person who decides to appeal any decision made by the Board or Council, with respect to any matter considered at such hearings, will need to request a record of the proceedings and, for such purpose, may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based per Florida Statute 286.0105. Community Development Code Sec 4 -206 states that party status shall be granted by the Board in quasi judicial cases if the person requesting such status demonstrates that s/he is substantially affected. Party status entitles parties to personally testify, present evidence, argument and witnesses, cross - examine witnesses, appeal the decision and speak on reconsideration requests, and needs to be requested and obtained during the case discussion before the CDB. An oath will be administered swearing in all persons giving testimony in quasi-judicial public hearing cases. If you wish to speak at the meeting, please wait to be recognized, then state and spell your name and provide your address. Persons without party status speaking before the CDB shall be limited to three minutes unless an individual is representing a group in which case the Chairperson may authorize a reasonable amount of time up to 10 minutes. Five days prior to the meeting, staff reports and recommendations on the above requests will be available for review by interested parties between the hours of 8:30 a.m. and 4:30 p.m., weekdays, at the City of Clearwater, Planning Department, 100 S. Myrtle Ave., Clearwater, FL 33756. Please contact the case presenter, at 562 -4567 to discuss any questions or concerns about the project and/or to better understand the proposal and review the site plan. . Michael Delk Cynthia E. Goudeau, MMC Planning Director City Clerk City of Clearwater P.O. Box 4748, Clearwater, FL 33758 -4748 NOTE: Applicant or representative must be present at the hearing. A COPY OF THIS AD IN LARGE PRINT IS AVAILABLE IN OFFICIAL RECORDS AND LEGISLATIVE SERVICES. ANY PERSON WITH A DISABILITY REQUIRING REASONABLE ACCOMMODATION IN ORDER TO PARTICIPATE IN THIS MEETING SHOULD CALL (727) 562 -4093 WITH THEIR REQUEST. To learn more about presenting to Clearwater boards and City Council, go to http:// clearwater .granicus.comNiewPublisher.php ?view id =11 and click on "Resident Engagement Video." You can also check the informational video out from any Clearwater public library. Ad: 10/09/08 F 008 - 08026; 34 tj 2 J W GROUP LLC 302 -308 N OSCEOLA PROPERTIES L 404 MARTIN LUTHER KING JR AVE 305 N FT HARRISON AVE CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5719 CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3923 ALBANIAN ISLAMIC CULTURAL CENT 225 N FT HARRISON AVE CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 4022 CAPEL PROPERTIES 870 LANTERN WAY CLEARWATER FL 33765 - CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY FLAG SER 503 CLEVELAND ST CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 4007 GIRONELLA, BONNIE R 430 OLD OAK CIR PALM HARBOR FL 34683 - 5866 JAMESCHRIS CORP 431 GULFVIEW BLVD CLEARWATER FL 33767 -'2508 M A M C FLORIDA SPORTSDANCE LL 200 BISCAYNE BLVD # 1000 MIAMI FL 33131 - ONE STOPPE SHOPPE INC 411 CLEVELAND ST CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 4004 PINELLAS COUNTY 315 COURT ST CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5165 ARNOLD BROWN PROPERTIES 311 PARK PLACE BLVD # 600 CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 4925 CHAMBERS, DIANNE B CHAMBERS, JAMES D 820 EL DORADO AVE CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1312 CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY RELIGIOU C/O HUBER, MARY SALINAS THE 319 S GARDEN AVE CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5423 GOUDREAULT, JOSEE 24 -28 N FT HARRISON CLEARWATER FL 33755 - JANNELLI, GILBERT G 909 S FORT HARRISON AVE CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3903 MAINSTREET CLEARWATER DEV 206 S BRAND BLVD GLENDALE CA 91204 - 1310 OSCEOLA CLEVELAND LLC 413 CLEVELAND ST CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 4004 SALINAS, MARY THE CHURCH SCIENTOLOGY RELIGIOUS 503 CLEVELAND ST CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 4007 •400 CLEVELAND 206 S BRAND BLVD GLENDALE CA 91204 - 1310 CAFE CONCERTO INC 800 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 903 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 3002 CHETKIN, LEONARD CHETKIN, MARY E 701 WASHINGTON ST KEY WEST FL 33040 - 4732 FIRST CHURCH OF CHRIST SCIENTI 210 TURNER ST CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5213 HICKOK INVESTMENTS LLC 1647 SAND KEY ESTATE CT CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2959 KWALL, LOUIS KWALL, JEAN H 133 N FORT HARRISON AVE CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 4020 MOREHOUSE, JASON S GOLD DREDGE LLC 1100 N ST STE 1 C SACRAMENTO CA 95814 - 5634 PEACE MEMORIAL PRESBYTERIAN CH 110 S FORT HARRISON AVE CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5107 TRIANGLE OLD BAY HOLDINGS LLC 501 N FORT HARRISON AVE CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3906 TRIANGLE S A LAND LLC TSAFATINOS, ANNA WATERS EDGE ONE LLC 305 N FORT HARRISON AVE 667 SNUG IS 4200 W CYPRESS ST STE 444 CLEARWATER FL 33755 3923 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1830 TAMPA FL 33607 - 4168 WHTBUFF INC 34 N FT HARRISON AVE CLEARWATER FL 33755 — .e Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Friday, March 13, 2009 4:24 PM To: Chesney, Ed Subject: Pinellas County Permit for Downtown Marina Ed - I don't remember the "why" this email of process was sent to you, but my guess is that I was probably asked to send an email to you regarding the boat slip schedule and our processes ( ?). Since this was to be a public hearing item at the CDB, I copied my Director and Assistant Director so that they would be aware of what information I was giving out. I also copied Kevin Garriott as the Building Official since part of the email dealt with the harbormaster building and its improvement, so that he was aware of the process for building permits. Not all employees in the Planning Department were copied on the email. Wayne - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Chesney, Ed Sent: Friday, March 13, 2009 8:32 AM To: Wells, Wayne Cc: Rice, Scott Subject: FW: Pinellas County Permit for Downtown Marina Wayne, I get your point. I do not remember seeing this document? Why am I the only one it is addressed to (not the applicant MQ or owner BM), but copied throughout the planning department? - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Thursday, March 12, 2009 6:19 PM To: Chesney, Ed Subject: Pinellas County Permit for Downtown Marina Ed - See the attached email for discussion of the Pinellas County permit. Wayne M.. Wells, AICP Planner III City of Clearwater 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, FL 33756 -5520 Phone: 727 - 562 -4504 Fax: 727 - 562 -4865 << File: E. Chesney - Downtown Boat Slips Schedule 6.25.08.rtf >> Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Friday, March 13, 2009 3:04 PM To: Chesney, Ed Subject: Pinellas County Application Thanks. We finally figured out how to get to it and I have printed it out for the hard file and saved it to our electronic file. - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Chesney, Ed Sent: Friday, March 13, 2009 12:05 PM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: RE: Pinellas County Application \ \msb- shares -1 \citywide \Planning Department Try the path above - see folder named pdf - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Friday, March 13, 2009 11:55 AM To: Chesney, Ed Subject: Pinellas County Application Ed - Thanks for the application pdf. Unfortunately, I do not have access to Engineering files on the S Drive. Is there another way to provide such to me (or just hard copies)? Wayne - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Chesney, Ed Sent: Thursday, March 12, 2009 11:00 AM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: Pinellas County Application « File: application.pdf >> See Sheet C -4 for set backs. This file is too big to send, but can be found at S: \Engin \CADSanPDF: file name 1228O8signed drawings.pdf Ed Chesney, P.E. Environmental Manager City of Clearwater 100 South Myrtle Ave., #220 Clearwater, FL. 33756 -5520 Phone: 727 - 562 -4742 Fax: 727 - 562 -4755 DIAL CORDY AND ASSOCIATES JNC Envrronrneraol Consultants 18 December 2008 Cleric, Water and Navigation Pinellas County .50 Floor 315 Court. Street- Clearwater, FL 33756 RE: Commercial and Multi- .Use Dock Permit Application For City of Clearwater Boat Slips To Whom It May Concern: On behalf of our client, the City of Clearwater, we are pleased to present you with this application for a commercial dock, in, addition to the :attached application form and authorization from the municipality, the information below is provided as required by Pinellas County Code - Sections 16 6 -328, -329, and -330. Information pertaining to each code item is, provided in boldface type below each item /request: Sec. 1'66 -328. Private dock apolication Jnfor`matidn (a) All applications for private dock permits, must be submitted to the�Clgrk °of the, Authority` or the Clerk's representative on approved application forms. This letter /application has been sub miff to the Clerk.. (b) All applications for permits for docks to be located. within a municipal Iiiir'it must have municipal approval prior to submission to the Authority. This. submittal, has the approval of the City. of Clearwater; please see attached letter from the Engineering D,epartment:of the City of. Clearwater. (c) Where required, notarized. statements of no objection signed by the adjacent property owners must be provided on the permit, drawing accompanying the application for a private dock. This :application is. not for .a private dock, and therefore does not require adjacent property owner statements. 490 OSCEOLA Ave luE - JACKSONVILLETrhCH, FLORmA 32250 904 -241 -8821 - FAx 904 -241 -8885 0 E- �WL.inf6@dialcordycom OFFICE ALSO 1N NVJL?,flNGTON,.NoRi -H CAROLINA 0 • Clerk, Water and Navigation, Pinellas County, FL Page 2 of 7 Clearwater Boat Slips (d) Adequate water depth at the slip and to navigable waters must be evidenced on applications for the expansion of existing dock facilities orthe creation of new dock facilities. Please see attached bathymetric survey. Adequate water depths. at slips are evidenced by the attached bathymetric survey. {e} The following information ,is required'for applications for private dock permits:< (1) The;application form. adopted by the authority; properly filied out and signed. The application form is attached for review and adoption by the 'authority; the form is properly filled out, and signed by proper municipal authority. (2) A detailed statement describing the upland land.. use and activities (i.e., commercial marinas multiuse, condominium, restaurant, private single- family, etc.). The uplands adjacent to the proposed marina comprise the following city properties: Coachman Park, the Harbor View Center, and. the.Bayfront Tennis Complex. Coachman Park is a public space; which regularly'hosts community events.. The Harbor View is 'a mixed - use convention `center,, while the tennis complex is part of the City of Clearwater's Parks & Recreation Department. Operations of these venues will continue. However, the new marina is expected to attract more visitors to these facilities, Pierce 1100 is a residential. condominium tower in the downtown zoning district, which allows residential use.. (3) Satisfactory evidence of title or extent of interest of the applicant to the riparian upland ownership or submerged; ownership with a copy of the, trustee's deed in chain of title. Please. see enclosed documents. The. City of Clearwater .owns the riparian upland adjacent W. the project area, and Leases from the State of Florida the submerged lands on which the project will. be constructed.. (4) A copy of the State Department of Environmental Protection permit application, where applicable. A copy of the initial Joint Environmental Resource Permit application package submitted to the DEP and the USAGE is enclosed {information supplied therein may be superseded by information in subsequent responses to the DEP /USAGE and in this County permit application). • • Clerk; W. ater and Navigation, Pinellas County, FL Page ,3 of 7 Clearwater Boat Slips (5,) A copy of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers permit application, where applicable. A: copy of the initial Joint Environmental Resource Permit application package submitted to the DEP and the USACE is. enclosed (infohnationsupplied therein may be superseded by information in subsequent responses to the DEP/U:SACE and in this County permit application). (6) An of idavit.attesting to the dates any existing structures were built, and..a copy of any prior authorization, or, permit for the structures; where applicable: There are no .existing structures in the proposed project's footprint. However, the Memorial Causeway bridge bisects the project area, and the Promenade (a pedestrian pier) is currently under construction immediately ,adjacent to the south (floating) dock of the proposed north boatslip basin.. (7) Permit sketches clearly depicting the proposed project. The sketches and application package must` include the following: a. Three .copies of black and white drawings of the proposed project drawn to an appropriate scale: (from 1.;10 to 1:60, lettering to be .0.10 inch high or greater),, PLEASE-SEE ATTACHED PLANS. b.. The drawings must clearly show the following: 1. Name of waterway. 2. North arrow and graphic.scale. 3. Existing shoreline; limits of the Waters of the County, and the mean high water line (or ordinary high water) based on NGVD. 4. Sufficent,water depths in the affected areas. 5. Locations. of existing structures. 6. Linea "r,footage of. riparian shoreline. 7.. All drawings and legal descriptions pertaining to proof of ownership submitted 'as part of an application for a .permit from the Authority must contain the required signature and seal of a registered professional land surveyor in accordance, with F.S. § 472.031(1). 8. Location of the proposed activity, including half section, township, range, affected water body, and a vicinity map, preferably a reproduction of the appropriate portion of the United States Geological Survey quadrangle.map-,. Please see enclosed plans. NAVD for the area, as listed on project plans, can be converted to NGVD using the following table: Clerk, Water and Navigation, Pinellas County, FL Page 4 of 7 Clearwater Boat. Slips Tubte_ 1 Tidal elevations published at Clearwater Beach, Florida ( NOAAI ).. 'Data available onlirre:;at httpsco= ops.nos.noaa gov (8) ,Proper fee as determined by the Authority._ (Ord. No. 94 -34, § %8', 4- 19 -94) We have; been informed by Mr. Hogan that a fee is. not necessary as a municipality is the applicant. We have also been informed that $250 will be required for posting notice for the Board of County Commissioners hearing. Sec. 166 =329. Multiuse private dock application information. The following information is required for applications for multiuse; private docks, (1) All information: required under section 16642.8'. Information required by Pineilas:County Code Section 166 =328 is provided above. (2) Except for applications for tie, piling and previously approved lifts, all applications for multiuse private and commercial ;docks shall have the signature and. seal of a state registered professional engineer affixed to the plans submitted for approval. Attached plans for the proposed project have the signature and seal of 'a state- registered professional engineer. ver'lical Datums feet. Clearwater, Harbor Clearwater Beach Hi hest Observed Water levet (03113/19,93 ) 5M Mean Hi her Hi h Wa*r MHHw t3.98 OM , Mean High Wate' MHW NAVp8t3 o:UO Mean. Sea Level :MSL A- 0.3011 M;v n Tide level (MTL) -0:31 -E1:33 NGVD29 .. ... -0:8 £f 86 Mean Low Water, MLW- .. 4:25 -127 Mean ,Lower, Low Water MLLVV -1,76 -1.79 Lowest Observed Water Levet u1119i1977 . .., 4:33 'Data available onlirre:;at httpsco= ops.nos.noaa gov (8) ,Proper fee as determined by the Authority._ (Ord. No. 94 -34, § %8', 4- 19 -94) We have; been informed by Mr. Hogan that a fee is. not necessary as a municipality is the applicant. We have also been informed that $250 will be required for posting notice for the Board of County Commissioners hearing. Sec. 166 =329. Multiuse private dock application information. The following information is required for applications for multiuse; private docks, (1) All information: required under section 16642.8'. Information required by Pineilas:County Code Section 166 =328 is provided above. (2) Except for applications for tie, piling and previously approved lifts, all applications for multiuse private and commercial ;docks shall have the signature and. seal of a state registered professional engineer affixed to the plans submitted for approval. Attached plans for the proposed project have the signature and seal of 'a state- registered professional engineer. I% - 1 • • Clerk; Water and Navigation, Pinellas County, FL Page 5 of 7 Clearwater Boat Slips (3) Information shall be submitted, prepared by a state registered civil engineer, attesting to the fact that adequate flushing exists and that the project will not cause stagnation or water quality degradation. Tidal current speeds were measured on 1.7 December 2008 in the vicinity of the center of the proposed north basin (Site A), and slightly west of the center of the proposed south basin (Site B). Tidal data and observed current. speeds are reported below: TIDES (Clearwater Beach station. 97 -18 December 2008). High 3:48 PM +10 ft Low 9:20 PM +08 ft High 3:22 AM +2.1 ft Observed Tidal _Current Speeds (1.7 December 20081 Site A 1,830 hrs 030m/s Site B. 1830 'hrs 0.44 m/s Site A 2330 hrs 0.37 m/s Site B 2330 hrs 0.31 m/s Tides before and after measurements were taken were not especially high or low, and therefore, the values above present a conservative estimate of speeds. We also believe that due to the position of the proposed marina, within and completely exposed. to the open waters of . Clearwater Harbor,, immediately adjacent to the Intracoastal Waterway, and" in, close proximity to Clearwater Pass, 'the issue of mixing and flushing character should require no further investigation. Tidal flushing at the project area is :sufficient, as indicated by the current speeds, and wave action, particularly due to ;strong: north winds (Olson and Associates Inc. 2006), would contribute to substantial water mixing even apart from tides. (4) The following additional information is required: a. A detailed statement describing the proposed activity and how it affects the Waters of the County. The proposed activity will not have adverse effects on the Waters of the County. Seagrass habitat in the project area will be preserved; and speed zones near and within. the facility will be enforced to ensure boating thatis not only safe, but 'environmentally sound, .such that sediments are not directly disturbed. Mariner and environmental education will be important fixtures a the new proposed facility, and that will help' ensure that the Waters of the County are viewed by the `user groups /public as a shared resource. b. A copy of the Southwest Florida Water Management District permit application, where applicable. No application to the SWFWMD is required for this project. • • Clerk, Waterand Navigation, Pinellas County, FL Page 6 of 7 Clearwater Boat Slips c. Permit sketches must be signed and sealed, by a state registered professional engineer. This has been carried out. (5) A;completed copy of the disclosure form-provided by the County. N/A (6) Location of the proposed activity; including half section, town hip, ran9e, affected: waterbody, and, a vicinity map; preferably a reproduction of the appropriate portion of `the United States Geological Survey < - quadrangle map. Please ,see the, response to item "e(7)b.7." regarding ;Pinellas County. Code Sectior% 166 -328 above. (7) A 1 :200 scale aerial photo of the area showing the,location of the property:therein, (Ord. No. 9434, § 10.9, 4= 19 -94) Please see enciosed aerial photo. Sec. 166 -330. Commercial dock application information The.following 'information is required forappiications: for commercial docks: (1) All information required under sections 1667328`.arid.166 -329. Information required by Pinellas County Co.def Sections 166 =328 and -329 are provided above. (2) An. approved hurricane plan unless waived per.section'166- 321(j), Please see.enclosed hurricane plan. (3) ,Any other information necessary to meet the criteria of Ihis article. (Ord. No. 94 =34, § '10.10; 4- 19 =941) We believe:that,all possible relevant information has been provided.. Clerk, Water ,and Navigation, Pinellas'Courity, FL Page Tof 1 Clearwater Boat Slips Thank you for your attention io this p -mail M6 Oevert@dialc6rdy.bom) project; Please call ore should you have any questions regarding the above. We forward look fo rd� to working With the 0 County on, this important prpjectf&,, the people of'Clearwater, Pinellas County and .Florida's Gulf coast. l�SSOCIA7�S INC:: Ecologist: Enclosures: Commercial, and Multi-Use Dock - Permit Application Form 1 incl I P&W Signpd/..S."Pplpd'Plans,'ai'11:110,to Scale Cross-septions,of Docks, Att&rjuator8, Reviatments Bathymetric 'Survey EvJdence of-Title for'Rip6rian Uplands E,)dent.,df Interest/Lease Oocumisn'iaflon�for Submerged 'Lands Cow& Jo(rtER'P sqbmitialto' DEO,'and USACF= Location Map on USGS Quad 4erial Photo at. 1`:200 Water Quality 'Statement from State- Registered P.E., (unless contained i above) Hurricane Plan L'IJo6s-Ju0601-1 100108-1070\Permitting- Pinefissco\Pin Go.applicatioh let:doc • • Direct 811 correspondence to Clerk, Water and Navigatioh,.6' Floor Application # 315 .5 Court Street (OFFICIAL USE-ONLY)' Clearwater, FL 33756 COMMERCIALAND MULTI-USE DOCK PERMIT APPLICATION PINELLAS,:COUNTY WATER AND NAVIGATION 1. PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION: A. A pp 1ca is 'N 1 e :: CI(yof Clearwater B., MailidgAddeess.- Municipal Manna, 26 Causeway auseway Blvd City: Clearwater St4te. FL Zip: '33767 727-462-6954 William. MorrisComy - learwate co13 C. Telephone No: E-mail Address: [L AGENT INFORMATION: A. Name: Jason Evert B. Address: 490.. Osceola Avenue Jacksonville Beath, 32250 City: State: R a. 1p. C. Tclep - hone No,- 904-241-8821 Email Address: j6'vdrt@diaJdordy . Xom III- SITE INFORMATION: A. Construction Site Address: 210 Drew St, Clearwater; FL 55756 chy: Clearwater FL State: Zip: 33755 g. .1: n ttnded Use. Marina/Bogt'Sl iog 16 29 lm/, 15 1 76482 002 001 o: C., Parcel ID Number: D. Incorporated: 6 Unincorporated: 0 E. Affected Water Body: Clearwater Harbor and'intratoasial Waterway F. Previous Permits: N/A G. Datc;applicantassumcd property ownership: No recent saleslist0d by.Pinellas County Prop Appr8r 13 H. Ob§.tructidfis, (Dogs, Fences,,e'tc.) None month /year L Attach 9. V2' X I I "vicini , ty Map showing specific project location. J. All other information pursuant to : Section 66-319 and 16&330 1 PiriellasCoun p ty Code, As needed. K. Does the project abut residentially zbncd property? Yes 0 No 91 L, For projects requiring a,,ptiblilc,h'cai-ij)g,attach a copy ,ofthe complete legal description. IV. PROJECT DESCRIPTION A. Nature and Size of Project: Application # (OFFICIAL USE ONLY) MULTI -USE COMMERCIAL Construct docks for 126 wet slips ranging from 30-55 feet in lug i h Square fleet: B. Variance: Yes ❑ No K1 Amount in variance: Length: Width: Setbacks: Left; Right: Other: 316,327 (7:25' ac) NOTE: It is.the applicant's; responsibility to clearly demonstrate that any requested variances are consistent with the variance criteria of Section 166 -291 of the Pinellas County Code. The applicant must demonstrate that a I iteral enforcement of the regulations would result in an extreme hardship.due,to the unique nature of the, project and the applicant's property. The hardship must not be created by action(s) of the project owner(s). The granting of the variance must be in harmony with the general intent of the regulations and not infringe upon the property rights of others. The variance requested must be the minimum possible to allow for the reasonable use of the applicant's property. Should the applicant fail to demonstrate that any variance request is consistent with the criteria outlined'in the regulations, staff cannot recommend approval of the application:. C., Net Increase in Number of Wetslips.: 121e V. CONTRACTOR INFORMATION: I, John W. Whalen a cerfifed.coniractor, state that the dock has not been constructed and that it will be built in compliance with all requirements and standards set forth in'the Pinellas County Code, and in accordance with the attached drawings which accurately represent all ih information required to be fumished. In the. event that this dock is not built in accordance with the permit or. {h� infofr�iation furnished is�{�gt co ct, l agree to either remove the dock or correct the deficiency. Signed:_ Company @ City = ._ Misener Marine Construction Inc. W. Commerce St. Tampa E -mail Address: lwhalen @misenemiarine,com VI. OWNER'S SIGNATURE: Cert No.: CGC- 010213 TelephoneNoi (813) 839 -8441 p State: Florida Zip: 33616 p. I hereby apply for a permit to do the above work, and state that the same will be done according to the map or plan attached hereto and made a part hereof, and agree to abide by the criteria of the Pinellas County Code for such construction and, if said construction is within the corporate limits of a municipality, to;first secure approval from said municipality. I further state that said construction will be maintained in a safe condition at all times, should this application be "approved, that I am the legal owner of the upland from which i herein propose to construct the improvements, and that the above stated agent(contractor may act, as my representative. 1, understand that I, not Pinellas County,. am responsible.for the accuracy of the information provided as part of this application and that it is my responsibility to obtain any necessary permits and approvals applicable for the proposed activities on either private or sovereign owned submerged land.: r Date Legal Signature LJ :MULTI -USE / COMMERCIAL DOCK MOW'' M)LW .BOTTOM Proflle%'ew �ENb. SCALE: P' N. • Application.4 (OFFICIAL USF,ONLY,) Planv,iow (4pPlicaht and 4djacdfi.tl ddcks) To SQtTARE FEET SQUARE FEET WATERWAY WIDTH WATERFRONT -WIDTH • EN.'(;1NT--f,RJNG DrPARTNmw beceinbcr 16,2008 Navigation Clerk, Water and Pinellas, County ,5thiploOr 3 "15 Court .8 fre: e Clearwater; FL 33756: • CITY OF CLEARWATER Pori' OFFICE Box 4748, CvmwAm, RojuDA 337584748 MumaPAL Sfxvicrs 15vmmm, 100 Soum MyRnx AmuE, CLwwwm, FLORWA 33756 Tr:UAME (727) 562-4750 FAx (7/ 27),562-4755 Re: Clearwater Downtown Boat Slip s To 'Whom It May Concern: Please accept this -letter on behalf of the City of Clearwater. (City.) for the above; referenced subject. The ,City has -reviewed .Md. approvedall 48 of the design, plan sheets prepared by Halcrow" Shore Master and, Misener Marie, f6r the dpwntow . n boat slip project. Cc: Ed. Chesney, P E.,C City of Clearwater learWater Jason Ev'ert, Dial Cordy &,Associate,§: U,wy bocuments\DT I b6atsli PA , Desigh_ letterldoc EmPLOYER"