Loading...
FLS2007-05022CLWCoverSheet FL 470 PALM T12EPAN1. JOB ATLAS# 258B ZONING: IEOD LAND USE: RU RECEIVED: 05/04/2007 INCOMPLETE: COMPLETE: MAPS: PHOTOS: t4t,. STAFF REPORT: DRC: of - o CDB: �x FROM :OLIVERIL ARCHITECTS WRITTEN SUBMITTAL R Q Provide Complete rNponees to (IENCOD). Explain how each I j I. The development or redevelops 7!2t—F-- - r-N 0 L4--s L->-- ml t t�RftivK—AAI RIES I 1D e N C- JFS 2. Single-family detached dwelling residentlal Infill prow 2ppicaut A L- .3. The development or rpqeval!qI?ir the foll6vAnietrileti5q, other do, tZ bX V1 A -ST? vcTv te e -0 4 T 6AT- he development of a parcel ph properties. 6.Vf 11:=-M?! 5. The uses within the residential 6, The development or the parc proposed for deveiopw*nt -TA -.. _UV FrLrh�M �I FAX TA FAX NO. :7277816623 21 2007 09:28AM P2 (8) Residwhal Infill Project criteria for the 1818nd Estates Neighborhood ConsaMtjon Overlay District achieved, In detail: of We parcel proposed fordevelopment is consisiontWth tine island r=awas Neighborhood Plan, ne -r- Tue P- lw#�C- H 15. aN ---tr ['- W --Mc — td community residential homes with 31X or fewer residents are the only pennitted uses eligible W the IS ... ......... ...... of the par9pl, proposed for development Is oI1*wwj&o impractical without devi2tions Ilmm one or more of W*nt standards. ... ... - . -... - A i-b ly-lk-' --5 1 9:�� OF IN 9 — P-E�,a —t-000M IVOT 89 fS 76 -7"NAE S7,1-4moirbs "A-Irg Avir ?j5/"17-rEL) MOK 7-/vr. �'EgeL�irl 0je1 MN7-_r-C2 O)kj *TH E IRREG-OLAR S ),KAlf _cA 4C Alt SF,7 Agwwk, for develop4rient as a residential Innii project will not materially reduce the fair nit irket value of abuffirig of ETA FL PAVcEk AS Pgo'?-si �FLVJ14-i, IAICKEA E 774E -t IS T-1AfG QLoe,) 0oo POS (=- A VA L-V a !Ct are comPaftle Mth adjacent land user. 4/VL,) 'IRE Col-'kIPAI'134e WIT14 'rH.F AWAC-P-MT- W for development as a residential infill projoel Will upgrade the Immediate vicinity of tho parcel P!7 CT 7. Tice design of the pmpfted re ei fal Infill project creates a farm and, function which onhigincer, the community charae-Wr of the Immodlale vFJ"nityof the parcel PMpomdfcr Ltlopmerit and the City of 0eanvateras a whole- -T#—F . � MI MN YA N --S 7r� 4 10?F51D�Algf � 4At D 66--47]El� ....... . . ....... F" +A/ S L) oeR.L) Ll,,V OZ Al 8. Flexibility In regard to lot wft, 1 1 setbacks, height, Off -street Parking, a=$ or other development standards Is Justfta by Me benefits s' to community Kracter and tho m vicinity Of 11110 Parcel proposed for ftyciopmont and the City of Cloarvmtor N a whole, e6fVjE.;rje4D Ap _F) TB r 'DUE 70 L A4,4AJI, 77VE AD3AC9-JV7- RWEI-S A-9F- Z)1W0A15TR,4771 I-A R A& b I/V AA IfA!5,65; F114 -!KM1r: RF/fe 5e73,6,-1r As 10V,4RE Apci.)EN77A SAIRanivusj C'd 9K998LLZz FVM%Dev6'6Prr4r' Afjv1AvA20W FQrfMft*1dCnV91 InN Pro*, (FLS) Wand Qualm 08.14-w.di5d Pacc 3 of 9 wedei-L asojoi 80.80 LO LI, AeW FROM :OLIVERI ARCHITECTS FAX NO. :7277816623 21 2007 09:27AM P1 AA • 0002921 DATE: !`1 0 7 TO: I _ FAX 7'r 56 .1 - 4865 PAGE 1 OF (including cover sheet) PROD. NAME: . - rff'e4n!l 0?- r'D��K PROJECT #: FROM:�4� ►rt GosT:g BENDING ORIGINAL ❑ Yes ❑ No p r3L 7` ,�E.�� /S TNT �xs'! i71�`^!�lAL .I'N Fit ( �,eu r�C,.i C�� �'�•�I•q rr3 � 7^�fC L,4t4 %.rj4 -F�S, � 'f/ DIP�UOL CofV 7` 10N 0 ✓,� L.4 F✓ �1s9"r4/Cr ARC= 4A) Y 0u0-x7-i0NS C-r V 15 M E CAC. 32707 US Hw,y. 19 • P41m I•iarbor, Fr, 34684 • Phone 727 • 781 • 7525 • Fax 727 • 781, 6623 • F mail design @oLveriarch.com • A' earater Planning Department 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, Florida 33756 Telephone: 727 - 562 -4567 Fax: 727 - 562 -4865 ❑ SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION ❑ SUBMIT 14 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION - Plans and application are required to be collated, stapled, and folded into sets ❑ SUBMIT APPLICATION FEE $ CASE #: 05622 RECEIVED BY (staff initials): DATE RECEIVED: ORIGINA4. RECEM f,'.A .I 12007 PLANNING DEPARTMENT" * NOTE: 15 TOTAL SETS OF INFORMATION REQUI RED (APPLICATIONS PLUS SITE PLAN SETS) FLEXIBLE STANDARD DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION Residential Infill Project - Single Family (LDR or LMDR only) (Revised 03/28/2006) A. APPLICANT, P APPLICANT NAME: MAILING ADDRESS: PHONE NUMBER: PROPERTY OWNER(S): List ALL owners on the deed AGENT NAME: MAILING ADDRESS: PHONE NUMBER: CELL NUMBER: PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT ERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4- 202.A) J 0SF-fH IIZ15PANI 4 114 ` 01 .6 C9661C. - r9AI±L- 005MAK , 64910 3410-771 A4 CELL NUMBER JOSePK T "P B. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION: PROJECT NAME: 1W 12E5c0WC6 4y_ Pig STREET ADDRESS 4.70 PAW (SLA PARCEL NUMBER(S): 05-11-15— A PARCEL SIZE (acres): 0 25S LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT 89 (f .6 66 Au.>oI'zDlif46 To Ti PROPOSED USE(S): DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST: Specifically identify the request (include number of units or square footage of non - residential use and all requested code deviations; e.g. reduction in required number of parking spaces, specific use, etc.) FAX NUMBER: E- MAIL ADDRESS: VALUATION: 000 - (7890 PARCEL SIZE (square feet): n EE'rmf.6s 0 CL Page 1 of 8 $ 11250, (3oJ (O i �RC.K 1r"'1 l5 f o 0 0 DOES THIS APPLICATION INVOLVE THE TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS (TDR), A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, OR A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED (CERTIFIED) SITE PLAN? YES — NO ✓ (if yes, attach a copy of the applicable documents C. PROOF OF OWNERSHIP: (Code Section 4- 202.A.5) 5 �c'TCA"CC.y�fO , 410, SUBMIT A COPY OF THE TITLE INSURANCE POLICY, DEED TO THE PROPERTY OR SIGN AFFIDAVIT ATTESTING OWNERSHIP (see page 7) D. WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 3- 913.A) C1 Provide complete responses to the six (6) GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA – Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail: 1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. �!i! �JUR- r- R-OPaSCD ST(�1LrUR �i(ks LINE W�ticvl k� lT �N l�Atvt� �v l-r� -r�-c 2. The prop sed evelopment will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. y1 E Flzo POseD 3TRULTAP01- - IS 16 _ Mo -�ropz _i rr R W GAN 3Tyc -6 - Cu-�7_v_!q HOPS W 1 cN_(� �oNtP_ !? - _�A Tome" WPRO(JAIDW� - -- - 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safely or persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use. 1 10a1TIV rgwsG'rCAILTI'1D L�"�► 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. 7rAls L5 k� cc - - -- -NAY -- ,P- iQPViC��t.E � -----=---------------- - - - - -- --------------- - - - - -- 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. 6. The design of the proposed dwelopment minimises adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts, on adjacent properties. A ._ ' kl _ : —.J ------ _ p� ap G -- - (Rz- _.. - - - -To ---- L�!lM1 ►W- ----------- - - - - -- SAI'lanning Department\Applica(ion Formsldevelopmenl review12006 FormslFlexible Standard Development (FLS) 2006.0c I'age 2 of'7 oPIGiN, RECEM WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Residential Infill Project Criteria) HAI L 1 &.WW I C? LM wMENY Provide complete responses to the seven (7) RESIDENTIAL INFILL PROJECT CRITERIA — Explain how eaci4Vg1�� ! o th 1. The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development is otherwise impractical Without de vi ns om the intensity and development standards. -rgg' , - � 6! i'lc cl+leA� ` D lbn( aF '1�fE C u�t±c�Pr� Gcllk![.Q Ivor t �,_ t-V GV 1F. 1/� v�rI IIV Y✓ b / X r VFAAA IRD S M69EC { I � 1'� M—A FO; ' Mr -CT V, Trn RA PDnP801A 6WWrEP aN Itff-- (AZ616LILAfZ . a.4-W PWR I A RC- CU4.�'i,c�( t- vrw ReAfL. T$�ct�. �s WPOATAWr: 2. The developmen of the parcel proposed for development as a esidential infill project will not materially reduce the fair market value of abutting properties. (Include the existing value of the site and the proposed value of the site with the improvements.) 19 D Oft'r" 6-' 7KE pXCEL Pcs mo W(L'L PYew ArLoF - ISTrNb VA 200000 PMPOS69 3. The uses within the residential infill project are otherwise permitted in the City of Clearwater. ►!V' 4. The uses or mix of use within the residential infill project are compatible with adjacent land uses. 1" ()60 C APwl AND AAE' PA11 �� - W 12, 17K :�IAr.�r�`i' LP"D USE. 5. The design of the proposed residential infill project creates.a form and function that enhances the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel or000sed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. 6"Wtbt4& COM fA L1tV1_ 1 . 56e P ATS aa/AMONS . 6. The design of the proposed residential infill project creates a form and function that enhances the community character of the immediate vicinity, of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. WOW- 5 AftL/Z 7. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height and off - street parking are justified by the benefits to community character and the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. W� ARC SEE IyG. Page 3 of 8 • WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Flexibility Criteria) n U Provide complete responses to the applicable flexibility criteria for the specific Use as listed in each Zoninq District to which the waiver i!. requested (use separate sheets as necessary) — Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail: E. STORMWATER PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS:' (City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteria 1` Manual and 4- 202.A.21) t]6 A STORMWATER NARRATIVE MUST BE SUBMITTED WITH ALL APPLICATIONS. All applications that involve addition or modification of impervious surface, including buildings, must include a stormwater plan that demonstrates compliance with the City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteria manual. A reduction in impervious surface area does not qualify as an exemption to this requirement. CU If a plan is not required, the narrative shall provide an explanation as to why the site is exempt. W-Z AMA-t'GLtEp NAIZVA�1VV,, U At a minimum, the STORMWATER PLAN shall include the following; ❑ t(XExisting topography extending 50 feet beyond all property lines; W, Proposed grading including finished floor elevations of all structures; SE6 AcvrQj(L EID avre I? xq- U NP, All adjacent streets and municipal storm systems; P+ Proposed stormwater detention /retention area including top of bank, toe of slope and outlet control structure; A narrative describing the proposed stormwater control plan including all calculations and data necessary to demonstrate compliance with the City manual. X4.1. Kl 1 A. ❑ tv p lk Proposed stormwater detention /retention area including top of bank, toe of slope and outlet control structure; ❑aPSignature and seal of Florida Registered Professional Engineer on all plans and calculations. ❑ �ACOPY OF PERMIT INQUIRY LETTER OR SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT (SWFWMD) PERMIT SUBMITTAL (SWFWMD approval is required prior to issuance of City Building Permit), if applicable l ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF STORMWATER PLAN REQUIREMENTS (Applicant must initial one of the following): &AUTION tormwater plan as noted above is included so Stormwater plan is not required and explanation narrative is attached. At a minimum, .a grading plan and finished floorelevations shall be provided. — IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A STORMWATER PLAN AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 562 -4750. F. SUPPLEMENTAL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 4- 202.A) Cpl SIGNED AND SEALED SURVEY (including legal description of property) —One original and 14 copies; ❑�JkTREE SURVEY (including existing trees on site and within 25' of the adjacent site, by species, size (DBH 4" or greater), and location, including drip lines.and indicating trees to be removed) — please design around the existing trees; No _CR.S*1a5 ON. S`.rt-71 ❑ tI TREE INVENTORY; prepared by a "certified arborist ", of all trees 4" DBH or greater, reflecting size, canopy (drip lines) and condition of such trees; wo '((Y s ON svf C I%* LOCATION MAP OF THE PROPERTY; : %C OO�PARKING DEMAND STUDY in conjunction with a request to make deviations to the parking standards (ie. Reduce number of spaces). Prior to the submittal of this application, the methodology of such study shall be approved by the Community Development Coordinator and shall be in accordance with accepted traffic engineering principles. The findings of the study will be used in determining whether or not / deviations to the parking standards are approved; W, GRADING PLAN, as applicable; 5M WMCAep sw6 ❑ Vp�, PRELIMINARY PLAT, as required (Note: Building permits will not be issued until evidence of recording a fit 61 ovided); U'N�COPY OF RECORDED PLAT, as applicable; RBXM PlAY 112007 SVIanning DeparlmenRApplication FormsWevelopmenl review12006 FormslFlexible Slanderd Development (FLS) 2006 doc bate , ol'7 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER 0 • Trepani Residence City of Clearwater Flexible Standard Development Application Section E Stormwater Narrative: The site in question is an existing residential lot with an existing structure on it. The proposed project includes demolishing the existing structure and rebuilding a new house in its place. The new design has a slightly larger footprint which will require the 15' -0" requested rear setback. The existing grades surrounding the structure are to remain as is. The existing stormwater drainage design for this parcel should not be affected by the proposed structure. The requested 15' -0" rear setback should have no impact on the drainage. HAY 11 2007 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER • G. SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4- 202.A) VSITE PLAN with the following information (not to ex(.;ced 24" x 36'): Index sheet referencing individual sheets included in package, North arrow; V Engineering bar scale (minimum scale one inch equals 50 feet), and date prepared; VAll dimensions; Footprint and size of all EXISTING buildings and structures; Footprint and size of all PROPOSED buildings and structures; All required setbacks; All existing and proposed points of access; -NP_ All required sight triangles; A, Identification of environmentally unique areas, such as watercourses, wetlands, tree masses, and specimen trees, including ly�, description and location of understory, ground cover vegetation and wildlife habitats, etc; Location of all public and private easements; V_ Location of a:l street rights -of -way within and adjacent to the site; Location of existing public and private utilities, including fire hydrants, storm and sanitary sewer lines, manholes and lift stations, gas V_ and water lines; ✓ All parking spaces, driveways, loading areas and vehicular use areas; Depiction by shading or crosshatching of all required parking lot interior landscaped areas; Location of all solid waste containers, recycling or trash handling areas and outside mechanical equipment and all required screening _ (per Section 3- 201(D)(i) and Index #701); Location of all landscape material; V Location of all onsite and offsite storm -water management facilities; 5U, ATfPrek6O NpVRx ve, Location of all outdoor lighting fixtures; and Location of all existing and proposed sidewalks. ❑ SITE DATA TABLE for existing, required, and proposed development, in written /tabular form: fYJ a s.. wr�p EXISTING G Land area in square feet and acres: It,SlI SQ. PV -2618 Ac Number of EXISTING dwelling units; I Number of PROPOSED dwelling units; Gross floor area devoted to each use; Parking spaces: total number, presented in tabular form with the number of required spaces; Total paved area, including all paved parking spaces & driveways, expressed in square feet,& percentage of the paved vehicular area; Official records book and page numbers of all existing utility easement; Building and structure heights; Impermeable surface ratio (LS.R.); and Floor area ratio_ (F.A.R.) for all nonresidential uses. REDUCED COLOR SITE PLAN to scale (8 Xz X 11); REQUIRED N A /I `& _... _ _..Nlk ... _ ..... - - _514 _4. L °/° — - - -- PROPOSED l►2 %I SW X258 k - -- --- `- -- _ __ ----- to ?I -st)w. �(•5% ?o3o_sQ,9r f - - - - -- 1354_.s� Li FOR DEVELOPMENTS OVER ONE ACRE, provide the following additional information on site plan: IAP One -foot contours or spot elevations on site; Offsite elevations if required to evaluate the proposed stormwnter management for the parcel; All open space areas; Location of all earth or water retaining walls and earth berms; ®RIVlNAh Lot lines and building lines (dimensioned); I Streets and drives (dimensioned); �AA�tir�•s112007 � Building and structural setbacks (dimensioned); MAY Structural overhangs; PLANNING DEPARTMENT SAPlanning DeparlmenRApplicalion Formsldevelopment review12006 FormsTlexible Standard Development (FLS) 2006.doc Page 4 of -/ H. LANDSCAPING PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4- 1102.A) U LANDSCAPE PLAN with the following information (not to exceed 24" x 36'): LW MCAPtK6 Not QE&N oe. t(.Wro NibAll existing and proposed structures; � Names of abutting streets; Drainage and retention areas including swales, side slopes and bottom elevations; Delineation.and dimensions of all required perimeter landscape buffers; Sight visibility triangles; Delineation and dimensions of all parking areas including landscaping islands and curbing; Existing trees on -site and immediately adjacent to the site, by species, size and locations, including driplinas (as indicated on required tree survey); Location, size, and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, indicated by a key relating to the plant schedule; Plant schedule with a key (symbol or label) indicating the size, description, specifications, quantities, and spacing requirements of all existing and proposed landscape materials, including botanical and common names; Typical planting details for trees, palms, shrubs and ground cover plants including instructions, soil mixes, backfilling, mulching and _ protective measures; Interior landscaping areas hatched and /or shaded and labeled and interior landscape coverage, expressing in both square feet and percentage covered: Conditions of a previous development approval (e.g. conditions imposed by the Community Development Board); Irrigation notes. ❑ t A REDUCED COLOR LANDSCAPE PLAN to scale (8% X 11); 0 >N._P,COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM application, as applicable. Landscape associated with the Comprehensive Landscape Program shall exceed minimum Code requirements to offset the areas where minimum Code will not be met. I. BUILDING ELEVATION PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4- 202.A.23) V BUILDING ELEVATION DRAWINGS —with the following information: V, sides of all buildings; V Dimensions; G _fir Colors (provide one full sized set of colored elevations); and C �r 15 EU�c'nao LWLt . / v Materials. S((ZU�'jVR[� -Ftl RA� - 5TVCGO lNprA-S f BAR40L -ALL, (Z0oP tl REDUCED BUILDING ELEVATIONS —same as above to scale on 8 %X 11. J. SIGNAGE: (Division 19. SIGNS / Section 3 -1806) NIA U All EXISTING freestanding and attached signs; Provide photographs and dimensions (area, height, etc.), indicate whether they will be removed or to remain. U All PROPOSED freestanding and attached signs; Provide details including location, size, height, colors, materials and drawing; freestanding signs shall include the street address (numerals) ❑ Comprehensive Sign Program application, as applicable (separate application and fee required). U Reduced signage proposal (8 % X 11) (color), if submitting Comprehensive Sign Program application. . MR hAY 112007 SAPlanning Department\Applicalion Formsldevelopment review \2006 Forms \Flexible Standard Development (FLS) 40®WING DEPARTMENT I'age 5 nr7 CITY OIFCLEARWATER ORIGINAL RECENED K. • TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY: (Section 4- 202.A.13 and 4- 801.C) PLANNING DEPARTMENT U Include if required by the Traffic Operations Manager or his /her designee or if the proposed development: CITY OF CLEARWATER • Will degrade the acceptable level of service for any roadway as adopted in the Comprehensive Plan. • Will generate 100 or more new vehicle directional trips per hour and /or 1000 or more new vehicle trips per day. • Will affect a nearby roadway segment and /or intersection with five (5) reportable accidents within the prior twelve (12) month period or that is on the City's annual list of most hazardous intersections. Trip generation shall be based on the most recent edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineer's (ITE) Trip General Manual. The Traffic Impact Study must be prepared in accordance with a "Scoping Meeting" held with the. Traffic Operations Manager and the Planning Department's Development Review Manager or their designee (727- 562 -4750) Refer to Section 4 -801 C of the Community Development Code for exceptions to this requirement. Acknowledgement of traffic impact study requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following): 2AND fic Impact Study is included. The study must include a summary table of pre- and post - development levels of service for all way legs and each turning movement at all intersections identified in the Scoping Meeting. ic Impact Study is not required. 9UDY IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A TRAFFIC IMPACT NONE HAS BEEN SUBMIT TED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 562- 4750. L. FIRE FLOW CALCULATIONS/ WATER STUDY: Provide Fire Flow Calculations. Water Study by a FIRE PROTECTION ENGINEER to assure an adequate water supply is available and to determine if any upgrades are required by the developer due to the impact of this project. The water supply must be able to support the needs of any required fire sprinkler, standpipe and /or fire pump. If a fire pump is required the water supply must be able to supply 150% of its rated capacity. Compliance with the 04 Florida Fire Prevention Code to include NFPA 13, MFPA 14, NFPA 20, NFPA 291, and MFPA 1142 (Annex H) is required. Acknowledgement of fire Flow calculations /water study requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following): Fire Flow Calculations/Water Study is included. Fire Flow Calculations/Water Study is not: required. Cp�UTION — IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A FIRE FLOW ALCULATIONS/ WATER STUDY AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Fire Prevention Department at (727) 562 -4334. M. SIGNATURE: I, the undersigned, acknowledge that all representations made in this application are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge and authorize Cit repres ntatives to visit and photograph tip "erty �ribe -i this application. 1 Sigpfafure of propel& owner or representative STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLA,9 Sworn to and subscribed before me this I day of A.D. 20 O to me and /or by o Is personally known as produced as i fication. A No ary public, My commission expires: SHARON E. PRAIRIE EXPIRES: May 9 Bonded Thru Notary Pubitc S: \Planning DepartmenMpplication Fonns \development review \2006 Forms \F -lextble. Standard Development (FMS) 2006.dor, I'age 6 of' 7 Prepared By: RECORD & RETURN TO: SOMERS TITLE COMPANY 1290 COURT STREET CLEARWATER, FL 33756 (' incidental to the issuance of a title File Number: 02090050c Parcel ID #: 05-29- 15-43434 -000- Grantee(s) SS #: This WARRANTY DEED, date Melissa C. Scoggins and Kirk whose post office address is: hereinafter called the GRANTO Joseph B. Trepani, a married whose post office address is: 5225 Enclave Drive, Oldsmar, hereinafter called the GRAI\NTE: (Wherever used herein the ten representatives and assigns of in WITNESSETH: That the GRA receipt whereof is hereby ackn( unto the GRANTEE, all that cer Parcel No. 05- 29 -I5- 43434 -OOC LOT 89, UNIT SIX -B (6-B), I recorded in Plat Book 61, Pap 1 -1088 ice policy. W. Y DEED UAL) 25, 2002 by husband and wife 4677 ntor" and "GrAntee" include all parties to this instrument and the heirs, legal s, and the successors and assigns of corporations.) for and in cons'deration of the sum of $10.00 and other valuable considerations, I, hereby grant, bargains, sells, aliens, remises, releases, conveys and confirms I situate in Pinellas County, Florida, viz: �i l D ESTATES OF CLEARWATER, according to the map or plat thereof as blic Records of Pinellas. County, Florida. P co l-d 9tG998LLZL pedeal eseael d99 :Z0 LO LO AeW SEP -25 -C2 UED 11 S111)JGCI• TO cot taxes and rrssc s�mr and prohibitions in TOWITHFAk with TO HAvr ANi) T ANT) THE GRAN seiztd of said land that theGRAN•I.OI persons whomsocv, IN W11 NT. SS will SIGNED IN TH}i P Signature: r K� I'rint Name; Signrture:zy Print Name: StWe of Montann County of 4-1=— THL FOREGOING Kirk Scongin9 a w116 is pc'tsonal ly lu i FAX N0, 0 P. 03 conditions, restrictions rcacrvations, limitations, easements grid agreements of record, if any; ]rc year 2002 and subsequent years; and to all applicable xMing ordinances and/or restriction; Y govcmmental authorities, if any. nements, humr:ditamern aid appurtenances thereto belonging or in anywise appertaining, ),11re same !n fee simpli forevor. eby eowltants with sai d GRANTEE that except as above noted, tix GRANTOR is lawtially imple; that the GRANTOR has good right and lawful authority to sell and ctmvcy said laird: fully warrants the titre to said land mild will defend the same against the lawful claims of all ANTOR has signed and scaled these presents the date $et forth above. ON 11111 FOLLOWING .JLtAds..iC e,S ENT was $warn and acknowledged before me on Sgrlember 25th., 20112 by. C. SeO%Zioe, husband and wire ur wbobis produced as idcrrlification. Sigtrature: i'ri . t Name; Notary Public, State of Montana H.hn R, Jackson KOIARY PUBLIC for tho State of Montana Residing or Kalispell; Montane Mr Commission 11101me ;Nn 190 =W 41.P�NINGC EP C� of Z'd 9tG998LLZL iuedeal eselel d99ZO LO LO AeW F-) I T 'Clearwater 0 Planning Department 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, Florida 33756 Telephone: 727-562-4567 Fax: 727-562-4865 ❑ SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION ❑ SUBMIT 14 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION - Plans and application are required to be collated, stapled, and folded into sets ❑ SUBMIT APPLICATION FEE $_ /0C) CASE #: 1 y L�- ✓ RECEIVED BY (staff initials): DATE RECEIVED: * NOTE: 15 TOTAL SETS OF INFORMATION REQUIRED (APPLICATIONS PLUS SITE PLAN SETS) FLEXIBLE STANDARD DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION (Revised 10/30/2006) -PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT- A. APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A) APPLICANT NAME: J0%YR Wo 16M% TWAN MAILING ADDRESS: A'q4 TUF(1,,'15 Ckz1%V- TIZAIL., OWMAP- 364AZPA PHONE NUMBER: 14__7 ' 1) fo:� - 51liG A r.7 FAX NUMBER: PROPERTY OWNER(S): List ALL owners on the deed AGENT NAME: 0 L, WEP__ I MAILING ADDRESS: 5 hV tl CA I PHONE NUMBER: -70( 14512,r FAX NUMBER: CELL NUMBER: E-MAIL ADDRESS: B. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A) PROJECT NAME: jj� PROJECT VALUATION: STREET ADDRESS PARCEL NUMBER(S): PARCEL SIZE (acres): PARCEL SIZE (square feet): LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lar sq Ujqrr 6A JSLAifo -es-wre-s Cr- CLCkruri PROPOSED USE(S): DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST: vwucw� (f- tzpg- Specifically identify the request (include number of units or square footage of non-residential use and all requested code deviations; e.g. reduction in required number of parking spaces, specific use, etc.) :: 4 p I . Npck co M%, $ 000 . .............. ...... ........ ............................. ... . ... . . ..... . . . .... ..... ....... ....... . ........ ACCOMIN� T S:\Planning DepartmenOApplication FormsWevelopment review0006 FormsTlexible Standard Development (FLS) 2006.doc Page] of 7 DOES THIS APPLICATION INVOLVE THE TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS (TDR), A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, OR A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED (CERTIFIED) SITE PLAN? YES _ NO ✓ (if yes, attach a copy of the applicable documents C. PROOF OF OWNERSHIP: (Code Section 4-202.A.5) OWNC(Z �o S06mi-1- 50WJp'-rW ❑ SUBMIT A COPY OF THE TITLE INSURANCE POLICY, DEED TO THE PROPERTY OR SIGN AFFIDAVIT ATTESTING OWNERSHIP (see page 7) D. WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 3-913.A) ❑ Provide complete responses to the six (6) GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA — Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail: 1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. S@Je112A(L- � W'.—,IkWENT " 5U1ZRW1',JJ G STf -uCTU R-GS AMY iA�E ,55178AC-K, VAtCH 9ANOG 'ROM (510" -TQ -10!O", OUR rROP65e,50 STrax-rt)k Pi HAS 0 r4LY -S C 0 tZ kt r<- V 0 JrS AT 114 C (C5(- 0 t' LINE Wk W44 k W75 t -r IM 14 m P-WZWO ZTWLTUW-5 will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. T06 FRot"OSOD 3T-aL)(,TLAPv,7 IS 6 IM 5rop—q "1- CUSroM 14006 acP A,- - M- i- PA(ZP&15 R"Tdr, W99 00AA CO D/ IV 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety or persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use. WING TJILS t.5 N 1?49A P 113C_T We-Avrk MD—Wrvi 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. Kao !�ls Ls '16., w510wtNu TAWnc- tls&)- s PV(C Ile 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. Prn p6,56D V q ..... ........ veems wrrk OiRv- v--et�iD s Q"mv* v 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts, on adjacent properties. N -A 46- r SAPlanning Department\Application FormsWevelopment review0006 FormsTlexible Standard Development (FLS) 2006.doc Page 2 of 7 WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Flexibility Criteria) ❑ Provide complete responses to the applicable flexibility criteria for the specific Use as listed in each Zoning District to which the waiver is requested (use separate sheets as necessary) - Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail: E. STORMWATER PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteria Manual and 4- 202.A.21) [� A STORMWATER NARRATIVE MUST BE SUBMITTED WITH ALL APPLICATIONS. All applications that involve addition or modification of impervious surface, including buildings, must include a stormwater plan that demonstrates compliance with the City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteria manual. A reduction in impervious surface area does not qualify as an exemption to this requirement. If a plan is not required, the narrative shall provide an explanation as to why the site is exempt. c-1Z AMPIT- Ck'610 INArRKA1111+/6. ❑ At a minimum, the STORMWATER PLAN shall include the following; ❑ t4XExisting topography extending 50 feet beyond all property lines; Proposed grading including finished floor elevations of all structures; si�f' 1-�11-KVJ W avre F(AH. ❑ NPIAII adjacent streets and municipal storm systems; ❑ Vp., Proposed stormwater detention /retention area including top of bank, toe of slope and outlet control. structure; N( A narrative describing the proposed stormwater control plan including all calculations and data necessary to demonstrate compliance with p the City manual. %Ssrt,,. PLTJ 0�'Cl A� o mm.?ems ❑ tv Q► Proposed stormwater detention /retention area including top of bank, toe of slope and outlet control structure; ❑tjPtSignature and seal of Florida Registered Professional Engineer on all plans and calculations. ❑ ORCOPY OF PERMIT INQUIRY LETTER OR SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT (SWFWMD) PERMIT SUBMITTAL (SWFWMD approval is required prior to issuance of City Building Permit), if applicable ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF STORMWATER PLAN REQUIREMENTS (Applicant must initial one of the following): Stormwater plan as noted above is included v Stormwater plan is not required and explanation narrative is attached. At a minimum, a grading plan and finished floor evations shall be provided. CA TION - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A STORMWATER PLAN AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 562 -4750. F. SUPPLEMENTAL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 4- 202.A) SIGNED AND SEALED SURVEY (including legal description of property) -One original and 14 copies; �C'Ckl>✓P 00PtTREE SURVEY (including existing trees on site and within 25' of the adjacent site, by species, size (DBH 4" or greater), and location, including drip lines and indicating trees to be removed) - please design around the existing trees; t4d, •'R1Go; 00. Sroz ❑ NPTREE INVENTORY; prepared by a "certified arborist ", of all trees 4" DBH or greater, reflecting size, canopy (drip lines) and condition of such trees; wO IKE'S * 5atr LOCATION MAP OF THE PROPERTY; see ff- (Pk'KC4iIW 00()�,PARKING DEMAND STUDY in conjunction with a request to make deviations to the parking standards (ie. Reduce number of spaces). Prior to the submittal of this application, the methodology of such study shall be approved by the Community Development Coordinator and shall be in accordance with accepted traffic engineering principles. The findings of the study will be used in determining whether or not deviations to the parking standards are approved; Lsl GRADING PLAN, as applicable; 5t: Trepani Residence City of Clearwater Flexible Standard Development Application Section E Stormwater Narrative: • The site in question is an existing residential lot with an existing structure on it. The proposed project includes demolishing the existing structure and rebuilding a new house in its place. The new design has a slightly larger footprint which will require the 15' -0" requested rear setback. The existing grades surrounding the structure are to remain as is. The existing stormwater drainage design for this parcel should not be affected by the proposed structure. The requested 15' -0" rear setback should have no impact on the drainage. 19 19 • 0 G. SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4- 202.A) i/ SITE PLAN with the following information (not to exceed 24" x 36 "): _Y Index sheet referencing individual sheets included in package; V/ North arrow; Engineering bar scale (minimum scale one inch equals 50 feet), and date prepared; All dimensions; !v h Footprint and size of all EXISTING buildings and structures; Footprint and size of all PROPOSED buildings and structures; _ All required setbacks; All existing and proposed points of access; All required sight triangles; Identification of environmentally unique areas, such as watercourses, wetlands, tree masses, and specimen trees, including �,rn _►vim description and location of understory, ground cover vegetation and wildlife habitats, etc; Location of all public and private easements; 1%' Location of all street rights -of -way within and adjacent to the site; Location of existing public and private utilities, including fire hydrants, storm and sanitary sewer lines, manholes and lift stations, gas and water lines; All parking spaces, driveways, loading areas and vehicular use areas; 01 Depiction by shading or crosshatching of all required parking lot interior landscaped areas: Location of all solid waste containers, recycling or trash handling areas and outside mechanical equipment and all required screening (per Section 3- 201(D)(i) and Index #701); !' n Location of all landscape material; t! Location of all onsite and offsite storm -water management facilities; SG(G A"rIPTCkW N CS Location of all outdoor lighting fixtures; and Location of all existing and proposed sidewalks. SITE DATA TABLE for existing, required, and proposed development, in written /tabular form: EXISTING REQUIRED PROPOSED Land area in square feet and acres; Aor- Na 12;919/ f Number of EXISTING dwelling units; Number of PROPOSED dwelling units; ------ (�jA._..._._.- _._- _- -. ----- NjDt Gross floor area devoted to each use; Parking spaces: total number, presented in tabular form with the _ number of required spaces; Total paved area, including all paved parking spaces & driveways, 1 c/ V _ expressed in square feet,& percentage of the paved vehicular area; 5:4 �� _�.�i /o -- -^ -__ 1071 50(x' 70 Official records book and page numbers of all existing utility easement; Building and structure heights; �qr OI! -- -- '2,I �tE�l I Impermeable surface ratio (I.S.R.); and 7430 s9ift 1 i • �2. _fib SQ>�� _ j Floor area ratio (F.A.R.) for all nonresidential uses. REDUCED COLOR SITE PLAN to scale (8 %X 11); FOR DEVELOPMENTS OVER ONE ACRE, provide the following additional information on site plan: Wft One -foot contours or spot elevations on site; Offsite elevations if required to evaluate the proposed stormwater management for the parcel; All open space areas; Location of all earth or water retaining walls and earth berms; Lot lines and building lines (dimensioned); Streets and drives (dimensioned); Building and structural setbacks (dimensioned); .................. Structural overhangs; S1Planning Deparlment\Application Forms \development review \2006 Forms\Flexible Standard Development (FLS) 2006.doc Page 4 of 7 • . 0 H. LANDSCAPING PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4- 1102.A) O LANDSCAPE PLAN with the following information (not to exceed 24" x 36 "): LWMCP Arfw w6 Not Qf,&N pegt6Wo �i All existing and proposed structures; I', Names of abutting streets; Drainage and retention areas including swales, side slopes and bottom elevations; Delineation and dimensions of all required perimeter landscape buffers; Sight visibility triangles; Delineation and dimensions of all parking areas including landscaping islands and curbing; Existing trees on -site and immediately adjacent to the site, by species, size and locations, including driplines (as indicated on required tree survey); Location, size, and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, indicated by a key relating to the plant schedule; Plant schedule with a key (symbol or label) indicating the size, description, specifications, quantities, and spacing requirements of all existing and proposed landscape materials, including botanical and common names; Typical planting details for trees, palms, shrubs and ground cover plants including instructions, soil mixes, backfilling, mulching and protective measures; Interior landscaping areas hatched and /or shaded and labeled and interior landscape coverage, expressing in both square feet and percentage covered; Conditions of a previous development approval (e.g. conditions imposed by the Community Development Board); Irrigation notes. OVA REDUCED COLOR LANDSCAPE PLAN to scale (8 %X 11); ❑ W,, j COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM application, as applicable. Landscape associated with the Comprehensive Landscape Program shall exceed minimum Code requirements to offset the areas where minimum Code will not be met. I. BUILDING ELEVATION PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4- 202.A.23) V BUILDING ELEVATION DRAWINGS —with the following information: V All sides of all buildings; V Dimensions; _✓, Colors (provide one full sized set of colored elevations); and Materials. S1R0C -' ?z Tu qA -5 -0 (MD�A,S I QPc�. 'CIi� (�of REDUCED BUILDING ELEVATIONS —same as above to scale on 8%X 11. J. SIGNAGE: (Division 19. SIGNS / Section 3 -1806) O All EXISTING freestanding and attached signs; Provide photographs and dimensions (area, height, etc.), indicate whether they will be removed or to remain. ❑ All PROPOSED freestanding and attached signs; Provide details including location, size, height, colors, materials and drawing; freestanding signs shall include the street address (numerals) ❑ Comprehensive Sign Program application, as applicable (separate application and fee required). ❑ Reduced signage proposal (8 '/z X 11) (color), if submitting Comprehensive Sign Program application. SAPlanning Department\Application Formsldevelopment review \2006 Forms \Flexible Standard Development (FLS) 2006.doc Page 5 of 7 K. TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY: (Section 4- 202.A.13 and 4- 801.C) wjt Li Include if required by the Traffic Operations Manager or his /her designee or if the proposed development: • Will degrade the acceptable level of service for any roadway as adopted in the Comprehensive Plan. • Will generate 100 or more new vehicle directional trips per hour and /or 1000 or more new vehicle trips per day. - • Will affect a nearby roadway segment and /or intersection with five (5) reportable accidents within the prior twelve (12) month period or that is on the City's annual list of most hazardous intersections. Trip generation shall be based on the most recent edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineer's (ITE) Trip General Manual. The Traffic Impact Study must be prepared in accordance with a "Scoping Meeting" held with the Traffic Operations Manager and the . Planning Department's Development Review Manager or their designee (727- 562 -4750) Refer to Section 4 -801 C of the Community Development Code for exceptions to this requirement. O Acknowledgement of traffic impact study requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following): Traffic Impact Study is included. The study must include a summary table of pre- and post - development levels of service for all roadway legs and each turning movement at all intersections identified in the Scoping Meeting. Traffic Impact Study is not required. CAUTION — IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 562- 4750. L. FIRE FLOW CALCULATIONS/ WATER STUDY: NIPS Provide Fire Flow Calculations. Water Study by a FIRE PROTECTION ENGINEER to assure an adequate water supply is available and to determine if any upgrades are required by the developer due to the impact of this project. The water supply must be able to support the needs of any required fire sprinkler, standpipe and /or fire pump. If a fire pump is required the water supply must be able to supply 150% of its rated capacity. Compliance with the 2004 Florida Fire Prevention Code to include NFPA 13, MFPA 14, NFPA 20, NFPA 291, and MFPA 1142 (Annex H) is required. O Acknowledgement of fire flow calculations /water study requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following): Fire Flow Calculations/Water Study is included. Fire Flow Calculations/Water Study is not required. CAUTION — IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A FIRE FLOW CALCULATIONS/ WATER STUDY AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Fire Prevention Department at (727) 562 -4334. M. SIGNATURE: I, the undersigned, acknowledge that all representations made in this application are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge and authorize City repres atives to visit and photograph the pr4pertytde ed i th application. Signature of propirty owner or representative STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS Sworn to and subscribed before me this day of A.D. 20 to me and /or by who is personally known has produced as identification. Notary public, My commission expires: S: \Planning Deparlment\Application Forms development review \2006 FormsTlexible Standard Development (FLS) 2006.doc Page 6 of 7 N. AFFIDAVIT TO AUTHORIZE AGENT: 1. Provide names of all property owners on deed — PRINT full names 12. That (I am /we are) the owner(s) 3. That this oro%ft1St V1, 1 4. That the undersigned as (his /their) agent(s) to execute yZns or c 5. That this affid has b t�Induce the 6. That I . o e property are necessary by City repre tives to visit and photograph the pr rtyl � 1 7. That (1 /we), the undersigned &ut t )by c ify Before ReWS 03 an an officer duly pers Deposes 2nd says that he/she fully de Notary Seal /Stamp A ,\ ■WAA RAi tr` to process this plication; .10 .�ir+r� Vlawsthe COUNT 5ned by the 7y ow m?' City ®� lb lorida, on this who h i been firs ly sworn he signed. Notary Public Signature My Commission Expires: SAPlanning DepartmenRApplication Forms \development review12006 FormslFlexible Standard Development (FLS) 2006.doc Page 7 of 7 jo Sit°' r Line Items: Case No Receipt #: 1200700000000003943 Date: 05/04/2007 Tran Code Description FLS2007 -05022 02 Flex Std - Residential Revenue Account No 5/4/2007 3:59:33PM Amount Paid 010- 341262 100.00 Line Item Total: $100.00 Payments: Method Payer Initials Check No Confirm No How Received Amount Paid Check OLIVERI ARCHITECTS R_D 11823 In Person 100.00 Payment Total: $100.00 THIS IS NOT A PERMIT. This is a receipt for an application for a permit. This application will be reviewed and you will be notified as to the outcome of the application. Page 1 of 1 cReceipt.rpt PLANINING DEPARTMENT June 28, 2007 Mr. Joseph Trepani 4914 Turtle Creek Trail Oldsmar, Florida 34677 • CITY CAF CLE,ARWATER POST OFFICE BOX 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758 -4748 MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562 -4567 FAX (727) 562 -4865 Re: FLS2007 -05022 — 470 Palm Island NE Dear Mr. Trepam: This letter constitutes a Development Order pursuant to Section 4 -202.E of the Community Development Code. On June 7, 2007, the Development Review Committee (DRC) reviewed your Flexible Standard Development application for a detached dwelling within the Low Medium Density Residential (LMDR) District / Island Estates Neighborhood Conservation Overlay District (IENCOD) with a front setback reduction from 25 feet to 21 feet (to pavement) and a rear setback reduction from 25 feet to 15 feet (to building) as a Residential Infill Project pursuant to Section 2- 1602.E of the Community Development Code. The DRC DENIED this application based upon the following Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law. Findings of Fact 1. That the 0.258 -acre subject property is located at the northeast corner of Palm Island NE; 2. That the subject property is located within the Low Medium Density Residential (LMDR) District and the Island Estates Neighborhood Conservation Overlay District (IENCOD); 3. That the subject property is located within the Residential Urban (RU) Future Land Use Plan category; 4. That the development proposal is subject to the requirements of the Island Estates Neighborhood Plan; and 5. That there are no active Code Enforcement violations associated with the subject property. Conclusions of Law: 1. That the development proposal is inconsistent with the applicable portions of the Island Estates Neighborhood Plan; 2. That the development proposal is inconsistent with the Standards and Criteria as per Section 2- 1602.E.2.a of the Community Development Code; 3. That the development proposal is inconsistent with the Standards and Criteria as per Section 2- 1602.E.2.c of the Community Development Code; 4. That the development proposal is inconsistent with the Standards and Criteria as per Section 2- 1602.E.2.f of the Community Development Code; 5. That the development proposal is .inconsistent with the Standards and Criteria as per Section 2- 1602.E.2.g of the Community Development Code; 6. That the development proposal is inconsistent with the Standards and Criteria as per Section 2- 1602.E.2.h of the Community Development Code; 7. That the development proposal is inconsistent with the General Applicability Criteria as per Section 3- 913.A.1 of the Community Development Code; and FRANK HIBBARD, MAYOR JOHN DORAN, COUNCILMEMBER J.B. JOHNSON, COUNCILMEMBER BILL JONSON, COUNCILMEMBER CARLEN A. PETERSEN, COUNCILMEMBER "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER" June 28, 2007 470 Palm Island NE Page 2 of 2 8. That the development proposal is inconsistent with the General Applicability Criteria as per Section 3- 913.A.2 of the Community Development Code. Pursuant to Section 4- 501.A.3 of the Community Development Code, an appeal of a Level One application decision may be initiated by the applicant within seven (7) days of the date the Development Order is issued. The filing of an application/notice of appeal shall stay the effect of the decision pending the final determination of the case. The appeal period for your case expires on July 10, 2007. Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact Robert. G. Tefft, Planner jH at (727) 562 -4539 or via e -mail at robert.tefft Myclearwater.com. Sincerely, Michael Delk, AICP Planning Director S: (Planning DepartmentlCD BIFlex Standard (FLS)Ilnactive or Finished CaseslPalm Island NE 470 - Trepani Residence (LMDR- IENCOD) DeniedlPalm Island NE 470 -Development Order Denial 06- 28- 07.doc 0 10:00 am Case Number: FLS2007 -05022 -- 470 PALM ISLAND NE Owner(s): Joseph B Trepani 4914 Turtle Creek Trl Oldsmar, Fl 34677 TELEPHONE: No Phone, FAX: No Fax, E -MAIL: No Email Location: 0.258 -acre parcel at the northeastern corner of Palm Island NE Atlas Page: 258B Zoning District: IEOD, Island Estates Neighborhood Overlay District Request: Flexible Standard Development approval for a detached dwelling within the Low Medium Density Residential (LMDR) District / Island Estates Neighborhood Conservation Overlay District (IENCOD) with a front setback reduction from 25 feet to 21 feet (to pavement) and a rear setback reduction from 25 feet to 15 feet (to building) as a Residential Infill Project pursuant to Section 2- 1602.E of the Community Development Code. Proposed Use: Detached dwelling Neighborhood Clearwater Neighborhoods Coalition Association(s): Clearwater, Fl 33758 P O Box 8204 TELEPHONE: No Phone, FAX: No Fax, E -MAIL: No Email Neighborhood Island Estates Civic Association Association(s): Clearwater, Fl 33767 460 Palm Island Ne TELEPHONE: 442 -2237, FAX: No Fax, E -MAIL: No Email Presenter: Robert Tefft, Planner III Attendees Included: The DRC reviewed this application with the following comments: General Engineering: I . The following to be addressed prior to building permit: 1. Extend proposed drive apron to existing curb, not as shown. 2. If brick pavers are used for driveway installation, a separate right -of -way permit will be required for paver installation within the right -of -way. See Don Melone 727.562.4798 in Room #220 at the MSB (Municipal Services Building). General Note: DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review, additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. Environmental: I . No Issues. Fire: I . Show location of fire hydrant SHALL be within 500 feet of project. Acknowledge PRIOR to D.O. Harbor Master: No Comments Legal: No Comments Land Resources: I . Install erosion Control / and tree barricades 2. Apply for tree removal permits. Landscaping: No Comments Parks and Recreation: I . No issues - new single family residence replacing existing single family residence. Stormwater: Development Review Agenda - Thursday, June 7, 2007 - Page 10 • • The following shall be addressed prior to issuance of building permit. 1. Install over -sized gutters and downspouts to direct roof runoff to swales then to street or the bay and not to the adjacent homes. 2. Garage shall have a minimum finished floor elevation of 3/4 foot above the crown of the adjacentroad(s). 3. Site plan only shows the existing grade. Please show proposed grade elevations on plan. Existing grade shall be maintained as pre- developed elevation to ensure on site run -off not overflow to adjacent homes. Show swales along the east and west property lines to direct runoff to Palm Island NE and/or the bay. Show cross sections of swales. Note: Swales shall be a minimum of 6" deep and 5' wide. 4. Show proposed elevations of the pool deck and provide cross section between the deck and the east property line. 5. Survey shall include 50 -feet of adjacent topography, which includes finished floor elevations of the adjacent homes General notes: 6. Grading plan shall be signed and sealed by the civil engineer. 7. DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. Solid Waste: No Comments Traffic Engineering: I . No Issues. Planning: Development Review Agenda - Thursday, June 7, 2007 - Page I I I . Pursuant to Section 3 -911 of the Community Development Code, all utilities, including individual distribution lines, shall be installed underground. 2. Pursuant to Section 3- 1205.D.2 of the Community Development Code, single - family properties between 10,001 and 15,000 square feet in size are required a minimum of six trees. The proposed plan depicts only three unidentified palms (which given their placement would not constitute a tree). Revise the proposed plan to depict the required trees. Please be advised that all required trees must meet the standards set forth in Section 3- 1202.13.1 of the Community Development Code. 3 . Objective A of the Waterfront and Canals goal of the Island Estates Neighborhood Plan states that water views shall be preserved by maintaining established rear building setbacks, etc. Provide evidence that the proposal is in compliance with this objective. 4. Objective D of the Neighborhood Appearance and Maintenance goal of the Island Estates Neighborhood Plan seeks to maintain openness in rear setbacks, to preserve consistent appearance in waterfront yards and to control building bulk. Provide evidence that the proposal is in compliance with this objective. 5 . Objective G of the Neighborhood Appearance and Maintenance goal and the associated Development Standards of the Island Estates Neighborhood Plan state that 35% of the area between the principle structure and the right -of -way shall consist of vegitated landscaping in order to preserve a landscaped appearance throughout the neighborhood. The proposal, while denoting landscape areas, does not identify any proposed plantings. Provide evidence that this objective and development standard will be met. 6. Objective L of the Neighborhood Appearance and Maintenance goal and the Development Standards of the Island.Estates Neighborhood Plan address the screening of all mechanical equipment from public rights -of -way, adjacent properties and the waterfront. The proposed plan does not address how this objective is being complied with. 7. Objective B of the Utilities and Infrastructure goal of the Island Estates Neighborhood Plan states that any existing overhead utility lines are to be relocated underground. The proposed plan denotes that the existing overhead power lines are not to be relocated - this notation must be revised. 8. Objective B of the Character of Redevelopment goal of the Island Estates Neighborhood Plan states that setback requirements shall be consistent with deed restrictions. Provide evidence that the application is consistent with any and all deed restrictions. 9. Pursuant to the Development Standars of the Island Estates Neighborhood Plan, the rear /waterfront setback shall be 25' except where adjacent structures on either side of the lot are setback 20', then the minimum rear /waterfront setback shall be 20'. The application does not provide any evidence to support a deviation to 20' as per the above, much less a deviation to 15' as proposed. Further, the proposed rear setback is inconsistent with the Plan. 10. Keyed Note #22 is for an existing 4' wide sidewalk. General Note #8 states the existing sidewalk is to be removed and replaced to Code. Review the proposed plan to depict the new sidewalk and revise Keyed Note #22 accordingly. 11 . Pursuant to Section 3- 913.A.1 of the Community Development Code, the proposed development shall be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. The response provided discusses the proposed rear setback and states that it is in harmony with surrounding structures; however the response does not discuss all of the elements of the criteria and does not state how there is harmony between the existing and the proposed. Provide a revised response. 12. Pursuant to Section 3- 913.A.2 of the Community Development Code, the proposed development shall not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof The response provided states the architectural style of the proposed dwelling and that it is comparable to surrounding residences; however it does not discuss the criterion. Provide a revised response. 13. Pursuant to Section 2- 1602.E.2.a of the Community Development Code, a written response is to be provided that outlines how the redevelopment of the parcel shall be consistent with the Island Estates Neighborhood Plan. The response provided to this criterion states that the proposed residence has a high level of detailed Mediterranean architecture that is in keeping with other residences in the community; however it provides no discussion on the proposals consistency with the Plan. Development Review Agenda - Thursday, June 7, 2007 - Page 12 • 0 14 . Pursuant to Section 2- 1602.E.2.c of the Community Development Code, a written response is to be provided that outlines how the redevelopment of the parcel is otherwise impractical without deviations from the development standards. The response provided states that the desired architectural design of the residence would not be achieved without the requested deviations; however it does not discuss how the redevelopment of the parcel would be impractical without the requested rear setback deviation. 15. Pursuant to Section 2- 1602.E.2.f of the Community Development Code, a written response is to be provided that outlines how the redevelopment of the parcel as a residential infill project will upgrade the immediate vicinity of the subject property. The response provided references a response to another criterion, and does not address how the proposed development will upgrade the immediate vicinity. 16. Pursuant to Section 2- 1602.E.2.g of the Community Development Code, a written response is to be provided that outlines how the design of the proposed residential infill project will create a form and function enhancing the community character of the immediate vicinity. The response provided states that the architectural style (i.e. building design) will do this; however the response does not address how the site design (i.e. the reduced setbacks) will be an enhancement to the community character. 17. Pursuant to Section 2- 1602.E.2.h of the Community Development Code, a written response is to be provided that outlines how flexibility in regard to the required setbacks is justified by the benefits to community character and the immediate vicinity. The response provided states that many adjacent parcels demonstrate a similar /same rear setback to that requested. However, the response does not actually provided any evidence to support this claim. Other: No Comments Notes: The DRC has found the application to be inconsistent with the IENCOD. The DRC further finds that the application has not met the criteria as per Sections 3 -913.A and 2- 1602.E.2. Therefore, the DRC recommends denial of the application. Development Review Agenda - Thursday, June 7, 2007 - Page 13 0 • CITY OF CLEARWATER LL PLANNING DEPARTMENT ° Clearwater 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE ~_ CLEARWATER) FLORIDA 33756. U TEL: (727) 562 -4567 FAx: (727) 562 -4865 Date: To: From: Re: Comments: FACSIMILE COVER SHEET June 5, 2007 Daniel Costa, (727) 781 -6623 Robert G. Tefft, Planner III FLS2007 -05022 — 470 Palm Island NE Number of Pages Including Cover Sheet: 4 ** Please confirm receipt via e-mail at: robert .tefft(acWzyclearwater.coin ** ** Visit the Planning Department online at www.znyclearwater.conz ** Jun. 05 2007 11:31AN YOUR LOGO YOUR FAX NO. :.7275624865 NO. OTHER FACS -IMILE START TIME USAGE TIME MODE PAGES RESULT 01 J7816623 Jun.05 11:29AM 01'44 SND 05 OK TO TURN OFF REPORT, PRESS 'MENU' #04. THEN SELECT OFF BY USING ' +' OR FOR FAX ADVANTAGE ASSISTANCE, PLEBE CALL 1 -800- HELP -FAX (435- 7329). i i i i I i i 9 it of PL ,UNNING DEPARTMENT May 14, 2007 Mr. Joseph Trepani 4914 Turtle Creek Trail Oldsmar, Florida 34677 0 0 (("ATY OF CLEARWATER POST OFFICE Box 4748, CLEARWATER, ]FLORIDA 33758 -4748 MUNICIPAL. SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAx (727) 562 -4865 Re: FLS2007 -05022 — 470 Palm Island NE Dear Mr. Trepani: This letter is provided to you as the designated agent for the above referenced application. The application submitted to our office was previously been determined to be complete; however as staff has started the formal review of your application it has been determined that the application contained a flaw. The flaw was that a portion of the application specified the generic criteria for the Residential Infill Project type of application and not the specific criteria applicable to Residential Infill Projects within the Island Estates Neighborhood Conservation Overlay District — where your property is located. Due to this error, the Planning Department staff does not have the necessary information to complete the required review of your application. Please find attached a section of the application you have submitted, which has been revised to correctly reflect the criteria applicable to your request. Please provide complete answers to these criteria specifically indicating how your request complys with each criterion, and return the document to our offices as soon as possible. Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, Robert G. Tefft, Planner III Tel: (727) 562 -4539 Fax: (727) 562 -4865 E -Mail: rohert t�t(dlnzyclewivater.conz FaA.Nx HIBBARD, A/LAYOR Jr)I -rt +l Dorm?, COr1i CILT.`E ,iBER J. B. JOHNSON, COUNCILMEMBER BULL JONSON, COUNCILMEMBER CARLEN A. PETERSEN, COUNCILMEMBER °'EQUAL. EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATNE ACTION EMPLOYER" « � M a �waw�tA PLf+I\'NING DEPARTMENT May 11, 2007 Mr. Joseph Trepani 4914 Turtle Creek Trail Oldsmar, Florida 34677 • 0 C 1TY OF C LEARWAT E R POST OFFICE Box 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758 -4748 1! uNicIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAx (727) 562 -4865 Re: FLS2007 -05022 — 470 Palm Island NE — Letter of Completeness Dear Mr. Trepani: The Planning Department staff has entered your application into the Department's filing system and assigned the case number FLS2007- 05022. After a preliminary review of the submitted documents, staff has determined that the application is complete. The Development Review Committee (DRC) will review the application for sufficiency on Thursday, June 7, 2007, in the Planning Department Conference Room (Room 216), which is located on the second floor of the Municipal Services Building at 100 South Myrtle Avenue. You will be contacted by the Planning Department's Administrative Analyst within one week prior to the meeting date for the approximate time that your case will be reviewed. You or your representative (as applicable) must be present to answer any questions that the DRC may have regarding your application. Additional comments may be generated by the DRC at the time of the meeting. Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, Robert G. Tefft, Planner HI Tel: (727) 562 -4539 Fax: (727) 562 -4865 E- Mail: roberuefft(runzvcleari ater.COTn FRANK HIBBARD, MAYOR )OI-TN DORAN, COUNCILMEMBER J.B. JOHNSON, COUNCILMEMBER BILL JONSON, COUNCILMEMBER CARLEN A. PETERSEN, COUNCILMEMBER ".E,QUAL EMPLOYIMENT AND AFFIRMATPIE ACTION EMPLOYER" y w i �d�•��f Rtff a e PLANNING DEPARTMENT May 7, 2007 Mr. Joseph Oliveri Oliveri Architects 32707 US Highway 19 Palm Harbor, Florida 34684 i 0 .� 11- T Y 0 F C L JEE A R W A T E R POST OFFICE Box 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758 -4748 MUINICIRU SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562 -4567 FAx (727) 562 -4865 Re: FLS2007 -05022 — 470 Palm Island NE — Letter of Incompleteness Dear Mr. Oliveri: The Planning Department staff has entered your application into the Department's filing system and assigned the case number FLS2007- 05022. After a preliminary review of the submitted documents, staff has determined that the application is incomplete with the following comments: Section B of the application requires the provision of the parcel number of the subject property. This has not been provided on the application. . The description of request made within Section B of the application is inconsistent with the standards and criteria for the Low Medium Density Residential (LMDR) / Island Estates Neighborhood Conservation Overlay District (IENCOD) [ref. Section 2- 1602]. Also, as pavement/pavers are structures as per the Code, they must also meet setbacks. Based upon the proposed plans, the development request would need to be made as an Flexible Standard Development Residential Infill Project. 4? Section C of the application has not been completed. -_ Whie responses to the General Applicability Criteria have been provided, responses to the Flexibility Criteria for the LMDR/IENCOD have not been provided. Sections K and L of the application have not been completed. The applicant must initial one of the two acknowledgements in each section. �? Section M of the application requires that the applicants signature be notarized. The application submitted was not notarized. �' Section N of the application has not been completed. Pursuant to Section 4 -202 of the Community Development Code, if an application is deemed incomplete, the deficiencies of the application shall be specified by Staff and no further development review action shall be taken until those specified deficiencies are corrected and the application is deemed complete. Please resubmit FR ,NK. FT!BBARD, MAYOR jIOHf,T Dc)mN, COUNCI;.AMEPIBER J.B. JOHNSON, COUNCILMEMBER ?ILL JONSON, COUNCIL?,1EMBER CARLEN A. PETERSEN, COUNCILMEMBER "EQUAL. ENI..PLOYMENT AND IiFFIRI anvE ACTION EMPLOYER" revised plans and application materials as per the above comments no later than Noon, Monday, May 14, 2007. Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, Robert G. Tefft, Planner III Tel: (727) 562 -4539 Fax: (727) 562 -4865 E -Mail: robert.tefft a,myclearwater.com CITY OF CLEARWATER LL PLANNING DEPARTMENT ° } Clearwater 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE '- CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 U TEL: (727) 562 -4567 FAx: (727) 562 -4865 Date: To: From: Re: Comments: FACSIMILE COVER SHEET May 7, 2007 Joseph Oliveri, (727) 781 -6623 Robert G. Tefft, Planner III FLS2007 -05022 — 470 Palm Island NE Number of Pages Including Cover Sheet: 3 ** Please confirm receipt via e-mail at: robert.te. KDnivclearwater.coin ** ** Visit the Planning Department online at www.mvclearwater.com ** May. 07 2007 09:41AM YOUR LOGO YOUR FAX N0. 7275624865 NO. OTHER FACSIMILE START TIME USAGE TIME: MODE PAGES RESULT 01 97816623 May.07 09:39AM 01'03 SND 03 OK TO TURN OFF REPORT, PRESS 'MENU' #04. THEN SELECT OFF BY USING +' OR FOR FAX ADVANTAGE ASSISTANCE, PLEASE CALL 1 -800 -HELP -FAX C435- 73291. =aid: CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNMG DEPM MENT `••.�TER�` ' Posr OmcE Box 4748 CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748 ( BEKIRI, VASKO BEKIRI, PEMBE 431 PALM .ISL NE CLEARWATER FL 1 95PN a ? PIT"E° 01 0 02 ,M $00-33 4 0004229492 MAY22 2007 a MAILED FROM ZIPCODE 33602 NTXIE 337 bC 1 - 00 05/25/07 RETURN TO SENDER NOT DELIYERABLE.AS ADDRESSED UNABLE TO FORWARD BC: 33759474848 *0901- 00590 -23 -00 1„II„I,Illoll CITY OF CLEARWATER � = Q PLVMG DEPARTMENT !91 EpE�, POST ONCE Box 4748 CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748 MILLER, ROYLEE MILLER, KATHLEEN R X380 PALM ISL NE CLEARWATER FL 3 ?-- 3:37580 4'74e IN J' MEV BOVVts O _ 1 02 1M $00-334 uWuv 0004229492 MAY22 2007 MAILED FROM ZIPOODE 33602 X 337 NFE 1 506G 00 05/24/07 FORWARD. TIME EXP RTN TO SEND MILLER O30 N SNORE DR NE APT 14D ST PETERSBURG FL 33701 -2038 {{ ]t(( RETURN `` TO SENDER !1J(il lll�l�lF1 /11{1111)/ 111)11 1111�1�i{�Ill�lltlll / /1�1)1�11I i �Itv. �4 PLANNING DEPARTMENT May 15, 2007 0 Is CITY OF CLEARWATER POST OFFICE BOX 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758 -4748 MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562 -4865 RE: NOTICE OF FILING OF AN APPLICATION FOR FLEXIBLE STANDARD DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL AT 470 PALM ISLAND NE (FLS2007- 05022) To Surrounding Property Owners: As a property owner within 500 feet of 470 Palm Island NE, the City of Clearwater Planning Department gives notice that an application has been submitted for Flexible Standard Development approval for a detached dwelling within the Low Medium Density Residential (LMDR) District / Island Estates Neighborhood Conservation Overlay District (IENCOD) with a front setback reduction from 25 feet to 21 feet (to pavement) and a rear setback reduction from 25 feet to 15 feet (to building) as a Residential Infill Project pursuant to Section 2- 1602.E of the Community Development Code. On June 7, 2007, the Development Review Committee (composed of the City's professional staff) will review and determine whether the application demonstrates compliance with the City's Community Development Code. Following that review and determiniation, the Planning Director will issue a Development Order approving, approving with conditions, or denying the application. The earliest date that the City will make a decision on the application will be June 7, 2007. The City encourages you to participate in the review of this application. You may contact me at (727) 562 -4539 or via email at robert .tefft(Li)myclearwater.com for further information, visit our office to review the files and/or submit written comments to be considered in the City's review of the application. Please be advised that the applicant may submit additional or new information regarding this case, which you may review during regular business hours. However, no further notice will be provided to you should the application be amended. An appeal of the decision of the Planning Director may be initiated by the applicant or property owners within the required notice area who present competent substantial evidence at, or prior to, the Development Review Committee meeting on June 7, 2007. Sincerely, Robert G. Tefft, Planner III Tel: (727) 562 -4539 Fax: (727) 5624865 E -Mail: robert.te[i @niyclew atencoin FRANK I IIBBARD, MAYOR JOHN DORAN, COUNCILMEMBER J.B. JOHNSON, COUNCILMEMBER BILL JONSON, COUNCILMEMBER ® CAREEN A. PETERSEN, COUNCILMEMBER "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER" „MASLOWSKI, ELBA I THE 430 PALM ISL SE CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1938 �; STEFANADIS, GUS D STEFANADIS, SONJA B 460 PALM ISL SE CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1938 MILLER, ROYLEE MILLER, KATHLEEN R 380 PALM ISL NE CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1930 LAWSON, CHRISTINA PO BOX 373 WINDHAM CT 06280 - 0373 WEXLER, FRED S WEXLER, SHARON P 460 PALM ISL NE CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1932 ELLIOTT, CYNTHIA L 471 PALM ISLAND NE CLEARWATER FL 33767- 1933 IHRIE, ROBERT S 441 PALM ISLAND NE CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1933 DEAN, FRANCES 411 PALM ISL NE CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1933 0 FORD, S NEIL JR 0 FORD, KATHERINE C 440 PALM ISL SE CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1938 BRADLEY, BRUCE E THE 837 BERKSHIRE RD GROSSE POINTE MI 48230 - 1819 CLEARWATER NEIGHBORHOODS COALITION P O BOX 8204 CLEARWATER, FL 33758 JOE EVICH TEW, DOUGLAS M TEW, KATHRYN S 470 PALM ISL SE CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1938 KREMCHEK, JOHN K THE 6947 CRANBROOK DR BRECKSVILLE OH 44141 - 2704 FERGUSON, HUGO S FERGUSON, EVELYN M 440 PALM ISL NE CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1932 TREPANI, JOSEPH B 4914 TURTLE CREEK TRL OLDSMAR FL 34677 - 1969 BRITTS, JARRELL BRITTS, KATHERINE J 461 PALM ISL NE CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1933 BEKIRI, VASKO BEKIRI, PEMBE 431 PALM ISL NE CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1933 JEVTIC, VICTOR JEVTIC, MIHAILO M 401 PALM ISL NE CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1933 KEATS, GERRIT K KEATS, JOANNE M 615 HARBOR IS CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1802 ISLAND ESTATES CIVIC ASSOC. 460 PALM ISLAND NE CLEARWATER, FL 33767 PRESIDENT: SHARON WESLER ROPHIE, RALPH ROPHIE, VANESSA 450 PALM ISL SE CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1938 LEISURE, HUGH G LEISURE, JODI B 480 PALM ISL SE CLEARWATER FL 33767 1938 NOEL, JERRY M 420 PALM ISL NE CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1932 MARCHIANO, FRANK MARCHIANO, KATHLEEN E 450 PALM ISL NE CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1932 TRAVNICEK, GARY E TRAVNICEK, SANDRA K 480 PALM ISL NE CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1932 LIAKOS, GEORGE LIAKOS, DEMETRA 451 PALM ISL NE CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1933 KULIGOWSKI, JOSEPH M KULIGOWSKI, PATRICIA A 421 PALM ISL NE CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1933 CARPENTER, JAY E CARPENTER, JANA Q 612 HARBOR IS CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1801 GENGLER, JOHN M LOWNEY, MARY S 727 LEIGH AURORA IL 60506 - 5721 FLS2007 -05022 Robert Tefft 470 Palm Island 1 FZA A SECTION ...5 .. , TOWNSHIP .. 29 .. SOUTH, RANGE .. 15 .. EAST, ......PINELLAS ..... COUNTY, FLORIDA BOUNDARY SURVEY FOUND NAIL AND DISK 14019 `> Y PVCPi CURVE RADIUS Lot CHORD CHORD BEARING C1 50'R 42.70'R 41.41'RM N6757'32 "W RM s 140.80'R 140.91"M S67'57'32 "E R S68'01'04 "E M LOT 89 IV CD 3 TIE 27.,r CL � ilk izt FOUND NAIL AND DISK � N O TIE 6.98' 6'. PV6 0.761 �5 10 os Q Pr- P� Z� ,_,j V LEGEND --� - GUY WIRE — - - - — - OVERHEAD WIRES • - POWER POLE x— - PVC FENCE 8 - RECLAIMED WATER BOX 0- VALVE BOX 0- WATER METER ON -SITE TBM SET NAIL AND. TAB ELEV. = 7.90 FEET NAVD88 LEGAL DESCRIPTION LOT 89, UNIT 6B ISLAND ESTATES OF CLEARWATER, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 61, PAGE 46, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA. FLOOD ZONE THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY APPEARS TO BE IN ZONE AE (WITH A BASE FLOOD OF 11 FEET), IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE, FIRM MAP OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, COMMUNITY PANEL 125096, MAP NUMBER 12103C- 0102 -G, MAP REVISED SEPTEMBER 3, 2003. ELEVATIONS SHOWN HEREON ARE BASED ON THE CITY OF CLEARWATER'S BENCHMARK '1- 03.5," AT WHICH THE ELEVATION IS REPORTED AS 6.54 FEET NAVD88. CERTIFICATION: I HEREBY CERTIFY TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF THAT THE SURVEY SHOWN.HEREON SUBSTANTIALLY MEETS THE MINIMUM TECHNICAL STANDARDS FOR LAND SURVEYING` DESCRIBED IN THE STATE OF FLORIDA RULE 61G17, F.A.C. FURTHERMORE, THIS, CE i11FICA�O�4 BFI, ji NOT EXTEND TO ANY OTHER PERSONS OR PARTIES OTHER THAN THO NAMED ON TH& SURVEY AND SHALL NOT BE VAUD AND BINDING AGAINST JR1141 "ED SURVEYOR WITHOUT THE ORIGINAL RAISED SEAL REa F THE FL SED SURVEYOR AND MAPPER t �ti a 'GEORGE Ar ORMP- �i,�FI.ORIL� REGISTERED' LAND SURVEYOR No. 2512 DWAYNE A. RUTH, _lI?,ROFE§kNAL: SURVEYOR & MAPPER No. 5635 THIS SURVEY IS NOT COMPLETE OR VAUD'UNLE% ATTACHED TO SURVEYOR'S REPORT. CURVE TABLE CURVE RADIUS ARC CHORD CHORD BEARING C1 50'R 42.70'R 41.41'RM N6757'32 "W RM C2 170'R 145.17'R 140.80'R 140.91"M S67'57'32 "E R S68'01'04 "E M JOB NUMBER: 050370 DATE SURVEYED: 5/6 DRAWING FILE: 050370.DWG DATE DRAWN: 5/12 2 LAST REVISION: N/A X REFERENCE: N/A GEORGE A. SHIllIP H AND ASSOCIATES, INCORPORATED LAND SURVEYORS LAND PLANNERS 9901 'perm Raul ar ", slime D P" ZWOR, HaRlAd 94689 LB 1834 P8OYT (927) 784- -5496 JvJX (787) 796 -1,856 r✓� - i l �J ,r41MAM%1/MII�MAMM► = - � l�A►.. M�..MA1�i nA `: _ El -. A�^.° "^'AA ^'a"w' ^AtI�.�AMAAAAAAMI►.. �"m1A.�An^rad►+a'm ..AAMMAAAAAAAMAAAy AAAr.:.wMAAAAAAAAM. AAAAAAAA /IMr:A%IiIAAA%I��%IAq.., .�AMAMMAMAMAM .. AAAAAAAA.. �AAAAAAAAAAAr. �AMAAAMAAAI ►!�AMIIM.�I�I1�1�1r�._ .AMAAAAMMAMAAA r�/IAAAAAAAAAA/� A1V�IAAAMAIb1►._._-.,�,,�.,�, -- Al_i�. AMA'!/ 111111�AI� /IMM/111MA►...������u���� 2-00AAMAAAAAi► �� ■EV' rya MEN m Il I\ �7\ Aso �■ ■■ IO� S nj�h��hll1 AAIIAA�:,A�MAAA!ri/IAA�► .wiwww...:_•....� :1:�: q;pl.��la�l�h II�I�I� �hhhli �.. I •.:.._.__; I f'" �r::� I a ..n►. �11AAA%Ir.. AA ►�AAAAAAAri1AAAAr "�wwwwwwwww� —� AAAAAAAAw.- .+A�l _ .AAAAAAA�,,rjAAAAAA►. _ —_ —_ — !'���!��A�'�AAAAAAMAAAi— v AAA..,—• iAAAA► -- -- a El ■�� :eta; ■�■ °.:: ■■ ■■ FRONT EXTERIOR ELEVATION SCALE: NLT.S. r -V '.e1MAAAl1AAlil / o.. rAY tAMAMAMAArAAA►.. � �Mi.AAAA�AAMAMp .4U V��ilAr.: �A�I,�!A1111AAAAAAr.... AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAr.. MAMA .�A AAA /I/1 ^ AAAA�IIAAAAAA ,;AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAI�� � .�AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA� ° ° �i .www���i - ►� - -� ; A/ iAAAAAAAAAAAAAAMAMAAAAAAAAAMi ►.. �•� _ ��:� nnr.nnnnnnnnn �,' nnr.nnnnnnn., .�A%1AAAAAAAAAAA/Ir� ''��'• nAAMA1�..AAAAAAMAMAAAAAAAMAM► ..Al1AAAAAAMMAA _ .411�/1/11111/IAAAAMAAMAAAAA �^""`�- �'1i�1'.�_ �1 �I�AAAAAAAAMAAAl11e. �IIAAAAAAAAAAAAAA/lr. _ ,.A�iAA/ 11111/ 1AA1�r�..�AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA ARM ►� •'�AAAAAAAAAi►^ �AMMAAAAAAAMMMAA ^%- /11AAAAAAAAAAAAAAI1r.. �AAAAAAAAMMMM►,. _ —'.. _ ..,— ii11Al !AAAAAAAAAAl111AAAAAAA►�'�'�'_' �AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAI�..\ -_� -- �;_ O — ■■ - - EXTERIOR O o� s� �J 1 C _T ...eIAAAM'►! r1AAA AAA AMAII►� V IAA�AMAAI►.� ., s�AA.M�A s�A/ I/ U�I��R.. AAAAAAAAAAAA�- Aim— M�l' lib�A�r�AA-A. AAIArAAf A►.:►lAAAl�A►A',A.^A1AAMAAArA:r.:.r. �AA�vMAMAM/_Ile.. �AAAAAAr...V o,rQii/0►._M .A_./ 0►. .�i .• o1M. AA1/ A.nAnAnAdA A AAAAAAAAAAAAA 1AAl1AAAl1IlA�: r!.AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA1111AAA•� �AAl1Al111AA11111111AA111111A1111111111111111 IMAM I�AAMAMAMA1e•. MAMAMAMAa,. .� ... UC z .�IiAAAAAAAAAAAIIiI�... WW � ,./IAAAAAAAAAAI!1A/IAAA/1/1/IAA �__ �� LEFT SIDE EXTERIOR ELEVATION I