The URL can be used to link to this page

FLS2007-04017(/ . 9 L)5 CLWCoverSheet r ti FLS2007 -04017 1529 MAPLE ST SHERMAN RESIDENCE PLANNER OF RECORD: NOT ENTERED ATLAS # 279A ZONING: LMDR LAND USE: RU RECEIVED: 04/02/2007 INCOMPLETE: COMPLETE: MAPS: PHOTOS: STAFF REPORT: DRC: CDB: i 3 Y f1��rwatPr 0 Planning Department 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, Florida 33756 Telephone: 727 - 562 -4567 Fax: 727-562-4865 ❑ SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION ❑ SUBMIT 14 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION - Plans and application are required to be collated, stapled, and folded into sets ❑ SUBMIT APPLICATION FEE $ 100 0, CASE #: RECEIVED BY (staff initials): _ DATE RECEIVED: * NOTE: 15 TOTAL SETS OF INFORMATION REQUI RED (APPLICATIONS PLUS SITE PLAN SETS) FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION (Revised 03/28/2006) PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT A. APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4- 202.A) APPLICANT NAME: n MAILING ADDRESS: 15529 Maple Street, Clearwater, FL PHONE NUMBER: 727,441 ,41551 CELL NUMBER: PROPERTY OWNER(S): Alden Sherman; Laura Sherman List ALL owners on the deed AGENT NAME: PliSko Architecture P.A. MAILING ADDRESS: 800 Drew St. Clearwater Florida 33755 PHONE NUMBER: 727.442.7200 FAX NUMBER: CELL NUMBER 727,461.0 0 E MAIL ADDRESS: B. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4- 202.A) PROJECT NAME: Sherman Residence PROJECT VALUATION: $150.000 STREET ADDRESS 152A Merle treet PARCEL NUMBER(S): 11 /29/15/31194/000/1120 PARCEL SIZE (acres): T21 q PARCEL SIZE (square feet): 9,q50 _ LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot 112, Block 11, Glenwood Subdivision, as recorded in Plat Book 8, page 1 of the Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida. PROPOSED USE(S): Single Familv Residence DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST: flexible standard development to reduce the front setback from 25 -0" to 10' -0 ", Specifically identify the request side setback from 5' -0" to V -5 1/2", rear setback from 15' -0" to 4' -0" and to construct 3' (include number of units or square footage of non - residential use and all high wall within front setback. requested code deviations; e.g. reduction in required number of parking spaces, specific use, etc.) VKIV 11 GIPP4 Page 1 of APR 0 2 2007 PLANNING DERAMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER a 0 DOES THIS APPLICATION INVOLVE THE TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS (TDR), A DEVIOUSLY APPROVED PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, OR A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED (CERTIFIED) SITE PLAN? YES _ NO _ (if yes, attach a copy of the applicable documents) C. PROOF OF OWNERSHIP: (Code Section 4- 202.A.5) ❑ SUBMIT A COPY OF THE TITLE INSURANCE POLICY, DEED TO THE PROPERTY OR SIGN AFFIDAVIT ATTESTING OWNERSHIP (see page 7) D. ❑ 1. WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 3- 913.A) Provide complete responses to the six (6) GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA — Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail: The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. The requested setback variance is to allow for a new 2 car garage on the front of the existing residence, a new pool house in the back yard and a 3' high privacy wall in the front yard. All of these items are design to conform with the character and scale of the existing neighborhood. 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. The proposed improvements will add value to the existing property and thus increase adjacent property values. 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety or persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use. The proposed improvements will make it possible to park 2 cars on the property without overhanging the sidewalk or the street. 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. The proposed improvements will keep cars from parking in the street. 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. Since the existing house is ± 6' above the sidewalk, adding a lower garage on the front of the house closer to the street will make the house seem more in scale with the house around it. 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts, on adjacent properties. The garage will keep neighbors from ahving to look out their windows at cars, and the privacy wall in the front yard will keep noise from reaching the neighbors. The new pool house will replace the existing shed that is in disrepair in the back yard. ORIC71NAL RECEIVED Page 2 of 7 APR 0 2 2007 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWUATER • i WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Flexibility Criteria) ❑ Provide complete responses to the applicable flexibility criteria for the specific Use as listed in each Zoning District to which the waiver is requested (use separate sheets as necessary) — Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail: E. STORMWATER PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteria Manual and 4- 202.A.21) ❑ A STORMWATER NARRATIVE MUST BE SUBMITTED WITH ALL APPLICATIONS. All applications that involve addition or modification of impervious surface, including buildings, must include a stormwater plan that demonstrates compliance with the City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteria manual. A reduction in impervious surface area does not qualify as an exemption to this requirement. ❑ If a plan is not required, the narrative shall provide an explanation as to why the site is exempt. ❑ At a minimum, the STORMWATER PLAN shall include the following; ❑ Existing topography extending 50 feet beyond all property lines; ❑ Proposed grading including finished floor elevations of all structures; ❑ All adjacent streets and municipal storm systems; ❑ Proposed stormwater detention /retention area including top of bank, toe of slope and outlet control structure; ❑ A narrative describing the proposed stormwater control plan including all calculations and data necessary to demonstrate compliance with the City manual. • Proposed stormwater detention /retention area including top of bank, toe of slope and outlet control structure; • Signature and seal of Florida Registered Professional Engineer on all plans and calculations. ❑ COPY OF PERMIT INQUIRY LETTER OR SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT (SWFWMD) PERMIT SUBMITTAL (SWFWMD approval is required prior to issuance of City Building Permit), if applicable ❑ ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF STORMWATER PLAN REQUIREMENTS (Applicant must initial one of the following): Stormwater plan as noted above is included Stormwater plan is not required and explanation narrative is attached. At a minimum, a grading plan and finished floor n elevations shall be provided. 00-- CAUTION — IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A STORMWATER PLAN AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 562 -4750. F. SUPPLEMENTAL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 4- 202.A) ❑ SIGNED AND SEALED SURVEY (including legal description of property) —One original and 14 copies; ❑ TREE SURVEY (including existing trees on site and within 25' of the adjacent site, by species, size (DBH 4" or greater), and location, including drip lines and indicating trees to be removed) — please design around the existing trees; ❑ TREE INVENTORY; prepared by a "certified arborist ", of all trees 8" DBH or greater, reflecting size, canopy (drip lines) and condition of such trees;. ❑ LOCATION MAP OF THE PROPERTY; ❑ PARKING DEMAND STUDY in conjunction with a request to make deviations to the parking standards (ie. Reduce number of spaces). Prior to the submittal of this application, the methodology of such study shall be approved by the Community Development Coordinator and shall be in accordance with accepted traffic engineering principles. The findings of the study will be used in determining whether or not deviations to the parking standards are approved; ❑ GRADING PLAN, as applicable; ❑ PRELIMINARY PLAT, as required (Note: Building permits will not be issued until evidence of recording a final plat is provided); ❑ COPY OF RECORDED PLAT, as applicable; Page 3 of 7 RECHVED APR 02 2007 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER • 1529 Maple Street FLS 2007- 10 WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Residential Infill Project Criteria) ❑ Provide complete responses to the seven (7) RESIDENTIAL INFILL PROJECT CRITERIA — Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail: 1. The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development is otherwise impractical without deviations from the intensity and development standards. Constructing the Garage, Pool House, and wall additions will improve the value, the appearance, and the functionality of the existing residence. 2. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a residential infill project will not materially reduce the fair market value of abutting properties. (Include the existing value of the site and the proposed value of the site with the improvements.) The existing value of the site is $400,000 according to the most recent appraisal; the addition will increase the value of the site to an estimated $550,000, thereby increasing the value of the adjacent propert' 3. The uses within the residential infill project are otherwise permitted in the City of Clearwater. TitP will l i gne in ancardance with all ap2licable codes and standards. 4. The uses or mix of use within the residential infill project are compatible with adjacent land uses. The adjacent land uses are also single - family residential; the community has many parcels that are occupied by residences with attached garages. 5. The design of the proposed residential infill project creates a form and function that enhances the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. The design of the additions will allow for storage of vehicles off the street, freeing up on- street parking; the pool house will complement the character of the house, and the wall will frame the front of the propert 6. The design of the proposed residential infill project creates a form and function that enhances the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. The proposed addition will be consistent with the surrounding community and subdivision, having an enclosed Garage for off - street parking. Increasing the property value will increase the value of the City. 7. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height and off - street parking are justified by the benefits to community character and the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. Thp rgCliaegted setback Variance will Al l c-jw f--hp rnrctriiC+ -inn of an Pnr_l Ase Garage for off - street parking, construction of a pool house, and construction of a 3 -foot high wall to enhance privacy. ORIGINAL RECEIVED APR 0 2 2007 Page 3 of 8 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER as. G. SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4202.A) IN SITE PLAN with the following information (not to exceed 24" x 36 "): Index sheet referencing individual sheets included in package; North arrow; Engineering bar scale (minimum scale one inch equals 50 feet), and date prepared; All dimensions; Footprint and size of all EXISTING buildings and structures; Footprint and size of all PROPOSED buildings and structures; 0 All required setbacks; _ All existing and proposed points of access; All required sight triangles; Identification of environmentally unique areas, such as watercourses, wetlands, tree masses, and specimen trees, including description and location of understory, ground cover vegetation and wildlife habitats, etc; Location of all public and private easements; Location of all street rights- of-way within and adjacent to the site; Location of existing public and private utilities, including fire hydrants, storm and sanitary sewer lines, manholes and lift stations, gas and water lines; All parking spaces, driveways, loading areas and vehicular use areas; _ Depiction by shading or crosshatching of all required parking lot interior landscaped areas; Location of all solid waste containers, recycling or trash handling areas and outside mechanical equipment and all required screening {per Section 3- 201(D)(i) and Index #701); Location of all landscape material; Location of all onsite and offsite stormwater management facilities; Location of all outdoor lighting fixtures; and Location of all existing and proposed sidewalks. ❑ SITE DATA TABLE for existing, required, and proposed development, in written /tabular form: EXISTING REQUIRED PROPOSED Land area in square feet and acres; 9,350 SF 6,248 SF _ Number of EXISTING dwelling units; ! .__. _._...,..._ _1...._ Number of PROPOSED dwelling units; 1 1 Gross floor area devoted to each use; 3,249 SF 4,443 SF _ Parking spaces: total number, presented in tabular form with the number of required spaces; - - - -- ----- Total paved area, including all paved parking spaces & driveways, expressed in square feet & percentage of the paved vehicular area; 5 053 SF 5,749 SF Official records book and page numbers of all existing utility easement; - ---- "'° Building and structure heights; 231 -0" 231 -011 _ Impermeable surface ratio (I.S.R.); and .54 .61 Floor area ratio (F.A.R.) for all nonresidential uses. --- -- ----- ❑ REDUCED COLOR SITE PLAN to scale (8'/2 X 11); O FOR DEV ELOPMENTS OVER ONE ACRE, provide the following additional information on site plan: One -foot contours or spot elevations on site; Offsite elevations if required to evaluate the proposed stormwater management for the parcel; All open space areas; Location of all earth or water retaining walls and earth berms; Lot lines and building lines (dimensioned); _ Streets and drives (dimensioned); Building and structural setbacks (dimensioned); Structural overhangs; Page 4 of 7 APR 02 2007 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER 0 H. LANDSCAPING PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4- 1102.A) ❑ LANDSCAPE PLAN with the following information (not to exceed 24" x 36 "): All existing and proposed structures; Names of abutting streets; _ Drainage and retention areas including swales, side slopes and bottom elevations; Delineation and dimensions of all required perimeter landscape buffers; Sight visibility triangles; Delineation and dimensions of all parking areas including landscaping islands and curbing; Existing trees on -site and immediately adjacent to the site, by species, size and locations, including driplines (as indicated on required tree survey); — Location, size, and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, indicated by a key relating to the plant schedule; Plant schedule with a key (symbol or label) indicating the size, description, specifications, quantities, and spacing requirements of all existing and proposed landscape materials, including botanical and common names; Typical planting details for trees, palms, shrubs and ground cover plants including instructions, soil mixes, backfilling, mulching and _ protective measures; Interior landscaping areas hatched and /or shaded and labeled and interior landscape coverage, expressing in both square feet and percentage covered; Conditions of a previous development approval (e.g. conditions imposed by the Community Development Board); Irrigation notes. ❑ REDUCED COLOR LANDSCAPE PLAN to scale (8'% X 11); ❑ COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM application, as applicable. Landscape associated with the Comprehensive Landscape Program shall exceed minimum Code requirements to offset the areas where minimum Code will not be met. I. BUILDING ELEVATION PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4- 202.A.23) ❑ BUILDING ELEVATION DRAWINGS — with the following information; All sides of all buildings; Dimensioned; Colors (provide one full sized set of colored elevations); Materials; ❑ REDUCED BUILDING ELEVATIONS — same as above to scale on 8' /z X 11. J. SIGNAGE: (Division 19. SIGNS / Section 3 -1806) ❑ All EXISTING freestanding and attached signs; Provide photographs and dimensions (area, height, etc.), indicate whether they will be removed or to remain. ❑ All PROPOSED freestanding and attached signs; Provide details including location, size, height, colors, materials and drawing; freestanding signs shall include the street address (numerals) ❑ Comprehensive Sign Program application, as applicable (separate application and fee required). ❑ Reduced signage proposal (8 % X 11) (color), if submitting Comprehensive Sign Program application. ORIGINAL RECEIVED Page 5 of7 Ai R ® 2 2007 MANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER March 29, 2007 Planning Department 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, FL 33756 Re: Renovation of an existing Single Family Residence 1529 Maple Street, Clearwater, FL Written Submittal Requirements, Stormwater Plan None submitted — No site work is being done. Written Submittal Requirements, Traffic Impact Study None submitted — The use will remain single- family residential, and there will be no increase in traffic generated. ORIGINAL RECEIVED APR 0 2 2007 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER i • K TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY: (Section 4- 202.A.13 and 4- 801.C) l7 Include if required by the Traffic Operations Manager or his /her designee or if the proposed development: • Will degrade the acceptable level of service for any roadway as adopted in the Comprehensive Plan. • Will generate 100 or more new vehicle directional trips per hour and /or 1000 or more new vehicle trips per day. • Will affect a nearby roadway segment and /or intersection with five (5) reportable accidents within the prior twelve (12) month period or that is on the City's annual list of most hazardous intersections. Trip generation shall be based on the most recent edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineer's (ITE) Trip General Manual. The Traffic Impact Study must be prepared in accordance with a "Scoping Meeting" held with the Traffic Operations Manager and the Planning Department's Development Review Manager or their designee (727 - 5624750) Refer to Section 4 -801 C of the Community Development Code for exceptions to this requirement. O Acknowledgement of traffic impact study requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following): Traffic Impact Study is included. The study must include a summary table of pre- and post development levels of service for all roadway legs and each turning movement at all intersections identified in the Scoping Meeting. Traffic Impact Study is not required. CAUTION — IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 562- 4750. L. FIRE FLOW CALCULATIONS/ WATER STUDY: Provide Fire Flow Calculations. Water Study by a FIRE PROTECTION ENGINEER to assure an adequate water supply is available and to determine if any upgrades are required by the developer due to the impact of this project. The water supply must be able to support the needs of any required fire sprinkler, standpipe and /or fire pump. If a fire pump is required the water supply must be able to supply 150% of its rated capacity. Compliance with the 2004 Florida Fire Prevention Code to include NFPA 13, MFPA 14, NFPA 20, NFPA 291, and MFPA 1142 (Annex H) is required. 0 Acknowledgement of fire flow calculations /water study requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following): - �=--b� Fire Flow Calculations/Water Study is included. Fire Flow Calculations/Water Study is not required. CAUTION — IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A FIRE FLOW CALCULATIONS/ WATER STUDY AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Fire Prevention Department at (727) 562 -4334. M. SIGNATURE: 1, the undersigned, acknowledge that all representations made in this application are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge and authorize City representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application. ignature of property owner or represent ive STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS Sworn to an subscribed before me this —�*— day of A. fs °ttrm or by is personally known has produced as identification. NOTARY PUBLIC -STATE OF n "• KENNETH M PET] Commission #DD3 Notft public, Expit+- s: OCT. U3, My commission expires: BONDED THRU AgANTIC BONDING RECEIVED Page 6 of 7 iR 0 2 2007 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER N. AFFIDAVIT TO AUTHORIZE AGENT: 1. Provide names of all property owners on deed – PRINT full names: Alden Sherman Laura Sherman 2. That (I am/we are) the owners) and record title holder(s) of the following described property (address or general location): 1529 Maple Street 3. That this property constitutes the property for which a request for a: (describe request) flexible standard development to reduce the front setback from 25 -0" to 10' -0 ", side setback from 5' -0" to 1' -5 1/2", rear setback from 15' -0" to 4' -0" and to construct 3' high wall within front setback 4. That the undersigned (has/have) appointed and (does/do) appoint: Plisko Architecture, P.A. as (his/their) agent(s) to execute any petitions or other documents necessary to affect such petition; 5. That this affidavit has been executed to induce the City of Clearwater, Florida to consider and act on the above described property; 6. That site visits to the property are necessary by City representatives in order to process this application and the owner authorizes City representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application; 7. T1 Q(IA. , the u dersig ed authority, hereby certify that the foregoing is true and correct. rty Owner Properly Owner roperty Owner Property Owner STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS Before me( the undersigned, an officer duly commissioned by the laws of the ate of Florida, on this '70.— - day of personally appeared L k V� �y a-' �t LL who having been first duty swom Deposes and says that he/she fully understands the contents of the affidavit that he /she signed. P�" Notary Public State of Florida ? Patna ,Markey My Commission DD429435 se. or r� °p Expires 05/15/2009 Notary Public S;i p � u� o, Notary Seal/Stamp My Commission Expires: 5 11 �j Page 7 of7 ORIGINAL REIVED APR 02 2007 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER fie' ed by and lcwvter C. D'©rie Gottlieb & Gottlieb, P.A. 2475 Enterprise Road Sane 8100 Clearwater, FL 33763 727 - 9911977 Ffie Number: 05 -06110 Will Call No.: KEN BURKE, CLERK OF COURT PINELLAS COUNTY FLORIDA INST# 200607122102/24/2006 at 01:16 PM OFF REC BK: 14953 PG: 601 -602 DocType:DEED RECORDING: $18.50 D DOC STAMP: $3990.00 Parcel Identification No. 11/n/15/91194AHWI120 fSonee AbmweThis We For Reconrug Dam] Warranty Deed WATU'1ORY FORM - ==N 684.02, F.S.) This Indenum made this 24th day of February, 2006 between Thmmunt J. Ross, III, a married alas, joined by his wife Paula Ron wose post office address is 1812 Sunset Drive, Clrsrwater, FL 33753 of the County of Plludlas, State of Florida, grantor*, add'Alden Sherman and Laura Sherman, husband and wife whose post office address is 2138 Virginia Place, Atlanta, CA 30305 of the County of Fulton, State of Georgia, grameo *, WitneSSt th that said grantor, for and in consideration of the sum of TEN AND NO1100 DOLLARS ($10.00) and other good and valuable coaddezadons to said granoor in had paid by said' gramme, the receipt whereof is bereby acknowledged, has granted, bargained, and sold to the said greaten, and grantee's heirs and assigns forever, the following described land, sire, lying =d being in Pinellas County, Florida, to-wit: Lot 112, Glenwood Subdivision, aeem*ng to the map or plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 3, Page(s) 14, Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida. and said grantor does hereby filly warrant the tide to said land, and will defend the, same against lowu claims of all persons whomsoever. * "G=101' and "Gmtee"' are used tar singular ar phad. as cmaW vc*fim. In Witness Wberet g has hareuano set grantors hand and seal the day and year fint.above written. Signed, sealed avid derwered in our presence: . ORIGINAL REOFIVED APR 0 2 2007 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER The foregoing h0rument was aduumledged before me this 24th day b , 200+d by Thurman J. Ross, III and Paula Rass, win U is Personally (mown or [XI has produced a driwYs ' as ' itiftca [Plolmry Sea]] Notary Public My Commission Expires: IV--WDOW (- mftftVFv -# -ftp2 )kIGINAL RE IVFD APR 0 2 2007 PLANNING ©EPAR) MENT CITY OF CLEARWATER SCALE: 1 "= 20' LEGEND SM — Benchmark CB — Concrete Block CL — Centerline CM — Concrete Monument ELEV — Elevation FND — Found IP — Iron Pie IR — Iron Rod ASP — Asphalt LS,f — Land Surveyor Registration Number N/i — Nail & Tab N &O — Nail & Disk M.H. — Manhole P.R.M. — Permanent Reference Monument R7W — Right Of Way CONC — Concrete P.C. — Point OF Curvature P.T. — Point Of Tangent P.R.C. — Point Of Reverse Curvature P.C.C. — Point Of Compound Curve Ch. — Chord P.P. — Power Pole W.M. — Water Meter R.R.S. — Railroad Spike RAD. — Radius R — Record D — Deed M — Measured C — Calculated O.B. — Deed Book P.B. — Plat Book O.R. — Official Record Book PG — Page PVMT — Pavement P.O.B. Point Of Bearing P.O.C. Point Of Commencement CH.B. Chord Bearing R.P. — Radius Point CLF — Chain Link Fence P.C.P — Permanent Control Point P.I. — Point of Intersection GENERAL NOTES: 1. No instruments of record reflecting easements, rights —of —way, and /or ownership were furnished, except as shown. 2. No foundations or underground improvements located except as shown. J. If elevations are shown, such elevations ore based on N.G.V.D. 1929 (MSL 0.00), Except Pinellas County Where elevations are based on N.A.VD. 1988 (MSL = 0.00). 4. Declaration is made to original purchaser of the survey. It is not transferable to additional institutions or subsequent owners. 5. Surveyor has made no investigation or independent search for easements of record, encumbrances, restrictive covenants, ownership title evidence, or any other facts that an accurate and current title search may disclose. 6. No water meters located except as shown. 7. This Survey is prepared for the exclusive use of those parties certiried herein and is valid for one (1) year from Date of Certification. This property lies within Flood Zone X as depicted on Flood Insurance Rote Map Community Panel # 12103CO 107H Dated: 5 -17 -05 BENCHMARK: BASE FLOOD ELEVATION: N/A SECTION__1 L - TOWNSHIP-2-9S.–RANGE –L5L- BASIS OF BEARINGS: THE SLY R/W OF MAPLE ST., S.78'4747 E. (M) BOUNDARY SURVEY- LOT 112, GLENWOOD, ACCORDING TO THE MAP OR PLAT THEREOF AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 8, PAGE 14, PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA. CURVE TABLE (M) NO. RADIUS ARC CHORD CHORD BEARING 1 1260.58' 80.18' 80.16' S 78'4747 "E. �- MAp4e ST ASP 2 COHC CURB a, n / 85' R FND 9f" CU 7 v' N.87'01 '23'E. 1 15.07'(M� S.87 05'O 1 1/ FND 112" IR FND I" IP (NO fl) (NO /f) NW COR. LOT 111 NW COR. LOT 56 vJ -LOT 111 SHED ON 2O; _ SHED 0,V "� IRON FENCE ON O 8 Q) Z 4'IRON FENCE A/C V 7.7' IRON a FENC =,y 0.8' FND 4x4" CM (NO jf) P.P." I 0 LOT 114 REVISED: 2 -10 -06 (CERTIFICATIONS) OFFICE LOCATION: 1305 SOUTH HIGHLAND AVE. 4 CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 -3508 FND 112" IR NOT VALID WITHOUT THE SIGNATURE AND THE ORIGINAL RAISED SEAL OF A FLORIDA LICENSED SURVEYOR AND MAPPER. CONC' PREPARED FOR AND CERTIFIED TO: <'PAV WS MASONRY WALL CONC HOMEBANC MORTGAGE CORPORATION r� (TYPICAL) STEPS ALDEN SHERMAN AND LAURA SHERMAN —0 GOTTLIEB & GOTTLIEB, P.A. ATTORNEYS' TITLE INSURANCE FUND, INC. 02 l°y''' ' '-TIL'E ' r) O .. mM FND LINE CUT ON PROP. COR. ��0 COPYRIGHT © 2005 TARGET LAND SURVEYING INC. fi 6'%NC£ ON 0.6' a ° 5 L pNC �qLK 4 d FND 112" IR d .' I 80 d e - u 0.14' N. CONC' 4 0.29' W. <'PAV WS MASONRY WALL CONC FND LINE CUT ON PROP. COR. r� (TYPICAL) STEPS S` g. 60 �R 5' ...... `25 E- 0. .: l°y''' ' '-TIL'E ' '.fSTEPS:�.: .. .. I FND LINE CUT ON PROP. COR. ^:.... 34: -., N£ COR. LOT 113 )RE: • �' ti 3.7' :l. p ti COVERED 6'%NC£ ON 0.6' ... .. ry ENTRY 10.4' H TWO STORY CK ON 5.5' STUCCO_ FRAME :. 00 ME :D RESIDENCE 1.4' ....::.:::.: 1529 POOL 7 h 3 7' u•6 p, 21 3,q �• PAVERS. -:.. LOT 113 SPA Q) 11.0' • ,.. Ch' ON 7.7' ti 29.2' 7'LATTICE LOT 112 .'.. FENCE : .,. \ AND LANDING WOOD DECK a3. NSHED )6,A ErVT �pER P(4T� o 145 , 6'W000 E 17YP /CAG O t° O LOT 115 a y y M LINE LEGEND: CENTERLINE—L _ BOUNDARY LINE BUILDING LINE --t, PLAT LOT LINE 3 _ EASEMENT LINE POWER LINE - -I P -P- WOOD FEwN, CE M w w CHAIN LINK FENCE WIRE FENCE .WATER LFLOOD ZONE LINE BUILDING TIE(DIMENSION SHED ON 8.7' 6FENCE ON O,•q SHED ON 10.0' P.P. � I \ p FND 4x4" CM (NO /) p I 0.24' N. W 0.02' W. FND 314' 1P (NO 1) 0 LOT 116 TARGET LAND SURVEYING. INC. P.O. BOX 663 DUNEDIN, FL 34697 -0663 PH: (727) 784 -0573 I hereby certify that this survey was made under my responsible charge and meets • the minimum Technical Standards as set forth by the Florida Board of Professional Land Surveyors in Chapter 61 G 17, Florida Administrative Code, pursuant to Section 472.027, Florida Statutes Field Survey: 9 -8 -05 J`� FB# 467 -A p9 23 Philip C. Stock Job# 050902.05 RLS #3035, LB #5570 9 -9 -05 Drown By: D. MARISCAL DATE OF CERTIFICATION Surveyed By: P. STOCK -� Plisko Architecture P.A., AIA P —j �► Alex Plisko, Jr., AIA, NCARB April 5, 2007 City of Clearwater Planning Department 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, FL 33756 Re: FLS2007 — 1529 Maple Street — Letter of Incompleteness Dear Planning Staff- Listed below are Plisko Architecture, P.A., AIA, replies to the Planning Department Comments for the above - referenced project: 1. Page 4 — Site Plan Submittal Requirements — Provide 20' x 20' sight visibility triangles adjacent to driveway. • Reply: Added to Sheet A -1, Site Plan, Revised 04/05/07. 2. Page 4 — Site Plan Submittal Requirements — Provide footprint and size of all proposed buildings and structures. Please provide the dimensions of the "New Pool House" on the Site Plan. • Reply: Added to Sheet A -1, Site Plan, Revised 04/05/07. 3. Page 5 — Building Elevation Submittal Requirements — Provide the height of the "new garage" measured from .grade to midline of main roof. • .Reply: Added to Sheet A -1, Site Plan, Revised 04/05/07. 4. Page 5 — Building Elevation Plan Submittal Requirements — Provide the height of the "New Pool House" measured from grade to midline of main roof. • Reply: Added to Sheet A -1, Site Plan, Revised 04/05/07. Please feel to contact me if you have any further questions or concerns. Sincerely, Lt,� Z. ev &X_/;_ Daniel P. Uebler DPU /ss ORIGIN REM11 D APR 05 2007 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER 800 Drew Street Clearwater, Florida 33755 -4516 727 - 461 -0030 727 - 442 -7200 Fax 727 - 447 -6914 Florida Architect Corporation License Number AA C000813 pliskoarchitecture@verizon.net • • S�AL�m 4/2/2007 Receipt #: 1200700000000002840 12:06:22PM Date: 04/02/2007 r� Line Items: Case No Tran Code Description Revenue Account No Amount Paid FLS2007 -04017 02 Flex Std - Residential 010- 341262 100.00 Line Item Total: $100.00 Payments: Method Payer Initials Check No Confirm No How Received Check LAURA RICE SHERMAN _RD 2018 In Person Payment Total: OpiGINk RECRIED APR 02 2007 PL4NNING, DEP *j1WkW CITY OF CLEOWATEP THIS IS NOT A PERMIT. This is a receipt for an application for a permit. This application will be reviewed and you will be notified as to the outcome of the application. Page 1 of 1 Amount Paid 100.00 $100.00 cReceiptspt I Jul. 02 2007 03:50PM YOUR LOGO . YOUR FAX NO. :!7275624865 NO. OTHER FACSIMILE ;START TIME USAGE TIME MODE PAGES RESULT 01 94476914 Jul.02 03:48PM 01'23 SND 04 OK TO TURN OFF REPORT, PRESS 'MENU' #04. THEN SELECT OFF BY USING ' +' OR FOR FAX ADVANTAGE ASSISTANCE, PLEASE CALL 1- 800 -HELP -FAX i i C435- 73291. . Aug 16 07 03:03p P sko Arch 7274476914 i Planning Department CASE #: f a�Q r 100 South Myrtle Avenue RECEIVED BY (staff initials): _ a , Clearwater, Ftorida.33756 i DATE RECEIVED: U Telephone: 727 -662 -4567 Fax: 72762 -4$65 ❑ SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION I ❑ SUBMIT 14 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION - Plans and application are required to be collated, stapled, and folded into sets i ❑ SUBMIT APPLICATION FEE $ 100 NOTE: 15 TOTAL SETS OF INFORMATION REQUIRED (APPLICATIONS PLUS SITE PLAN SETS) FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION (Revised 03/28/20017 -- PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT- A. APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION: (Code APPLICANT NAME: Alden and aura Sherman MAILINGi4D6RESS: 1529 Maple Street, Clearwater FL PHONE NUMBER: 727.441.4151, CELL NUMBER: PROPERTYOWNER(S): Alden Sherman; Laura Sherman List ALL owners on the deed AGENT NAME. MAILING ADDRESS: PHONE NUMBER: CELL NUMBER 727.442.7200 FAX NUMBER: 727.461.003Q MAIL ADDRESS: ■ i B. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A) PROJECT NAME: Sherman` Residence PROJECT VALUATION: $150.000 STREET ADDRESS 1529 Maple Street PARCEL- iJUMBER(S): 11/29/15/31194/000 /1120 PARCEL SIZE (acres): .214 PARCEL SIZE (square feet): 350 _ LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot 112, Block 11, Glenwood Subdivision, as recorded in Plat Book 8, page 14, of the Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida. PROPOSED USE(S): Single Family Residence DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST. I flexible standard development to ri duce the front setback from 25 -0" t 0' -0" Specifically identify the request side setback from 5' -0" t 1' -51/2) rear setback from 15' -0" to 4' -0" and to construct 3' (include number of units or square footage of non - residential use and all high wall within front setbaC . requested co, de deviations; e.g. reduction in required number of Parking spaces, specific use, etc.) p.3 Aug 16 07 03:03p P sko Arch 74476914 p.1 FAX TRANOMI TTAL 1 J_ (727) 447 - 61q14 SENT-TO: ATTENTION: - - - -- - FAX NUMBER: DATE SENT: TIME 5ENT: _ 3: Oo HARD COPY TO FOLLOW: YE5: F NO:,N NUMBER OF PAGES TRAN5MITTED INCLUDING TH15 SHEET: 3 IF TH15 TRAN5MI5510N 6 NOT LE6I15LE, FLEA5E GONTAGT U5. SY: > )1- - Plisko Architecture, P.A., AIA 800 Drew Street Clearwater, Florida 33755 -4516 727. 461 -0030 727-442 -7200 Fax 727-447 -6914 Florida Architect Corporation License Number AA C000813 email aparchitect @aol.com PLANNING DEPARTMENT July 2, 2007 Mr. Daniel P. Uebler Plisko Architecture, P.A. 800 Drew St. Clearwater, FL 33755 • C CITY OF CLEARWATER POST OFFICE BOX 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758 -4748 MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562 -4567 FAx (727) 562 -4865 RE: Development Order regarding case FLS2007 -04017 at 1529 Maple St. (Sherman Res.) Dear Mr. Uebler: This letter constitutes a Development Order .pursuant to Section 4 -202.E of the Community Development Code. On May 3, 2007, the Development Review Committee (DRC) reviewed your application for Flexible Standard Development approval for front, side and rear setback reductions associated with garage and pool house additions to a single - family residence, in the LMDR zoning district. The request was for reductions to the front (north) setback from 25 feet to 10.3 feet to garage P. face, side (west) from 5 feet to 1.4 feet to garage and rear (south) from 5 feet to 4 feet to accessory (pool house) structure as a residential mfill project, per section 2- 203.C. The DRC requested modifications and upon receipt of the resubmitted materials recommended approval of the application with the following bases and conditions: Bases for Approval: 1. The proposal complies with Residential Infill Project criteria under the provisions of Section 2- 203.C; 2. The plan complies with General Applicability Criteria under the provisions of Section 3 -913; and 3. The proposed development is compatible with the surrounding area. Conditions: 1. Pool house shall meet required rear setback of 5 feet. 2. Damaged Chinaberry trees (3) be removed, show on building permit submittals. 3. Reconfigure sidewalk to permit 19 -foot space between garage door face and sidewalk to eliminate pedestrian conflict with vehicle parked in front of garage. Right of way permits required. 4. Record "Declaration of Restricted Covenant" with Pinellas County, limiting the use of the property as single - family residence. FRANK HIBBARD, MAYOR S:\Planning DepartmeAeIJ &9WSQ9M9k*NWactive or Finished Cases\Maple 1529 - Sl4AaW(t f-DXPfqbVRWple 1529 Development BILL JONSON, COUNCILMEMBER Or c CAREEN A: PETERSEN, COUNCILMEMBER "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER" • July 2, 2007 Page 2 - Sherman • I concur with the findings of the Development Review Committee and, through this letter, approve your application for Flexible Standard Development with the above four condition. The approval is based on and must adhere to the submitted application and revised site plan dated received May 29, 2007. Pursuant to Section 4 -303, an application for a building permit shall be made within one year of this Flexible Standard Development approval (July 2, 2008). All required certificates of occupancy shall be obtained within one year of the date of issuance of the building permit. Time frames do not change with successive owners. The issuance of this Development Order does not relieve you of the necessity to obtain any building permits or pay any impact fees that may be required. In order to facilitate the issuance of any permits affected by this approval, please bring a copy of this letter with you when applying. Pursuant to Section 4- 502.A, an appeal may be initiated within seven days of the date the Development Order is issued by an applicant or property owners within the required notice area and who presented competent substantial evidence in the Level One review. A copy of the Development Order is being sent to those surrounding, property owners who presented competent substantial evidence in the Level One review. The filing of an application/notice of appeal shall stay the effect of the decision pending the final determination of the case. The appeal period for your case will expire on July 9, 2007 (seven days from date of Development Order). If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call Neil Thompson, Development Review Manager, at 727 -562 -4557 or neil .thompson(2myclearwater.com. Sincerely, Michael Delk, AIC Planning Director SA\Planning Department \C D B\Flex Standard (FLS) \Inactive or Finished Cases\Maple 1529 - Sherman (LMDR) - Approved\Maple 1529 Development Order.doc DECLARATION OF RESTRICTIVE COVENANT KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: WHEREAS, the undersigned is /are the fee simple owner(s) of the following described property situated and being in the City of Clearwater, Florida [the "subject property "]: Lot(s) , Block _ thereof, as recorded in County, Florida, and of _ Plat Book Page Subdivision, according to the plat of the Public Records of Pinellas WHEREAS, the undersigned owner(s) of a single family residence located on said property desire to utilize said Lot(s) as a single family residence with associated occupied space, and the undersigned owner(s) do(es) hereby declare and agree as follows: That the subject property will be used only as one single family residence as defined by the Clearwater Community Development Code, as amended from time to time. NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the undersigned do(es) hereby declare that he /she will not convey or cause to be conveyed the title to the above property without requiring the successor in title to abide by all terms and conditions set forth herein. FURTHER, the undersigned declare(s) that this covenant is intended and shall constitute a restrictive covenant concerning the use, enjoyment and title to the above property and shall constitute a covenant running with the land and shall be binding upon the undersigned, his /her successors and assigns and may only be released by the City of Clearwater, or its successor, in accordance with the ordinance of said City then in effect. • 0 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has /have caused hand(s) and seal(s) to be affixed hereto on this day of '200 WITNESS(ES) By: Print Name: By: Print Name: STATE OF FLORIDA ) COUNTY OF PINELLAS ) OWNER(S) By: Print Name: By: Print Name: I HEREBY CERTIFY that on this day personally appeared before me who is personally know to me or has produced (type of identification) as identification and he /she acknowledge that he /she executed the foregoing, freely and voluntarily, for purposes therein expressed. SWORN TO AND SUBSCRIBED before me on this day of , 20_. My commission expires: NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF FLORIDA PREPARED BY: Leslie K. Dougall -Sides Assistant City Attorney City of Clearwater 0 0 N of July 2, 2007 Mr. Daniel P. Uebler Plisko Architecture, P.A. 800 Drew St. Clearwater, FL 33755 • RE: Development Order regarding case FLS2007 -04017 at 1529 Maple St. (Sherman Res.) Dear Mr. Uebler: This letter constitutes a Development Order pursuant to Section 4 -202.E of the Community Development Code. On May 3, 2007, the Development Review Committee (DRC) reviewed your application for Flexible Standard Development approval for front, side and rear setback reductions associated with garage and pool house additions to a single - family residence, in the LMDR zoning district. The request was for reductions to the front (north) setback from 25 feet to 10.3 feet to garage face, side (west) from 5 feet to 1.4 feet to garage and rear (south) from 5 feet to 4 feet to accessory (pool house) structure as a residential infill project, per section 2- 203.C. The DRC requested modifications and upon receipt of the resubmitted materials recommended approval of the application with the following bases and conditions: Bases for Approval: 1. The proposal complies with Residential Infill Project criteria under the provisions of Section 2- 203.C; 2. The plan complies with General Applicability Criteria under the provisions of Section 3 -913; and 3. The proposed development is compatible with the surrounding area. Conditions: 1. Pool house shall meet required rear setback of 5 feet. 2. Damaged Chinaberry trees (3) be removed, show on building permit submittals. 3. Reconfigure sidewalk to permit 19 -foot space between garage door face and sidewalk to eliminate pedestrian conflict with vehicle parked in front of garage. Right of way permits required. 4. Record "Declaration of Restricted Covenant" with Pinellas County, limiting the use of the property as single - family residence. SAPlanning Department \C D B\Flex Standard (FLS) \Inactive or Finished Cases\Maple 1529 - Sherman (LMDR) - Approved\Maple 1529 Development Order.doc ,Plisko Architecture OR., AIA ® Alex Plisko, Jr., AIA, NCARB May 29, 2007 Mr. Neil Thomson City of Clearwater Planning Department PO Box 4748 Clearwater, FL 33758 -4748 Re: FLS2007 — 04017 Issues Dear Mr. Thomson: Listed below are Plisko Architecture, P.A., AIA, replies to the Planning Department Comments for the above - referenced project: Type: Engineering Condition — Reviewed by Steve Doherty • No structure(s) may be constructed within the 4 ft. rear easement... • Reply: Pool House has been modified so it is 5' -0" from the rear property line. Type: Zoning Condition — Reviewed by Steven Everitt • Only one dwelling per unit is permitted on this site... • Reply: Pool House square footage has been clarified in Site Data Table on Sheet A -1. Type: Land Resource Condition — Reviewed by Rick Albee • Show to be removed the 3 Chinaberry trees (U) at the SE corner as these trees have been topped to avoid the adjacent wires. Revise plan prior to building permit. • Reply: Added note to remove three chinaberry trees as requested. Type: Traffic Engineering Condition — Reviewed by Steve Doherty • The driveway distance between the face of garage and back edge of sidewalk shall be 19' deep to prevent a parked vehicle from encroaching into and /or /blocking the sidewalk... • Sidewalk has been reconfigured so vehicles parked in front of garage doors will not block sidewalk. 800 Drew Street Clearwater, Florida 33755 -4516 727 - 461 -0030 727 - 442 -7200 Fax 727 - 447 -6914 Florida Architect Corporation License Number AA C000813 pliskoarchitecture@verizon.net Type: Zoning Condition — Reviewed by Steven Everitt • Applicant shall provide evidence that the reductions of setbacks are consistent with adjacent properties... • This house is the only house in the neighborhood that does not have a garage. Due to the complexities of the site, the proposed location is the smallest and most conforming option of.putting a garage on the site. The garage floor elevation will be at the same height of the existing driveway. Attached are two perspective views showing the minimal impact on the street front. (See Site Plan Sheet A -1 for perspective locations.) Also, the property is on the inside of a bend in the street, so the view of a passer -by is never directly at this lot. Please feel to contact me if you have any further questions or concerns. Sincerely, Daniel P. Uebler DPU /ss encl: Four copies Revised Site Plan A -1 dated 05.29.07 Four copies Perspective #1 Four copies Perspective #2 Photographs of existing property PERSPECTIVE #1 KENOVATION5 TO: 152q MAPLE STREET GLEARINATER, FL PLISKO ARCHITECTURE, P.A. AIA 800 DREW STREET CLEARWATER, FL 33755 1 J 1 727- 461 -0030 727- 442 -7200 FAX 727- 447 -6914 rn ?a (J) a M n rn N r Ut a � A O � O r -v' Q A N tri M�0 yI —{ �► a > -n to x -r v. v 9. Ct1 A C" J w rn w� •• � J LA A LA 0 • DECLARATION OF RESTRICTIVE COVENANT KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: WHEREAS, the undersigned is /are the fee simple' owner(s) of the following described property situated and being in the City of Clearwater, Florida [the "subject property "]: Lot(s) thereof, as _ , Block of _ recorded in Plat Book County, Florida, and Page Subdivision, according.to the plat of the Public Records of Pinellas WHEREAS, the undersigned owner(s) of a single family residence located on said property desire to utilize said Lot(s) as a single family residence with associated occupied space, and the undersigned owner(s) do(es) hereby declare and agree as follows: That the subject property will be used only as one single family residence as defined by the Clearwater Community Development Code, as amended from time to time, and 2. That the occupied space located over the two -car garage shall not be used as a single family residence on the subject property. NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable-consideration, the undersigned do(es) hereby declare that he /she will not convey or cause to be conveyed the title to the above property without requiring the successor in title to abide by all terms and conditions set forth herein. FURTHER, the undersigned declare(s) that this covenant is intended and shall constitute a restrictive covenant concerning the use, enjoyment and title to the above property and shall constitute a covenant running with the land and shall be binding upon the undersigned, his /her successors and assigns and may only be released by the City of Clearwater, or its successor, in accordance with the ordinance of said City then in effect. 0 • IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has /have caused hand(s) and seal(s) to be affixed hereto on this day of .9 200 WITNESS(ES) By: Print Name: By: Print Name: STATE OF FLORIDA ) COUNTY OF PINELLAS ) OWNER(S) By: Print Name: By: Print Name: I HEREBY CERTIFY that on this day personally appeared before me who is personally know to me or has produced (type of identification) as identification and he /she acknowledge that he /she executed the foregoing, freely and voluntarily, for purposes therein expressed. SWORN TO AND SUBSCRIBED before me on this day of 200 My commission expires: NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF FLORIDA PREPARED BY: Leslie K. Dougall -Sides Assistant City Attorney City of Clearwater i FAX COVER MEMO CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT 100S. MYRTLE AVE., 2nd Floor CLEARWATER, FL 33756 (727) 562 -4567 FAX: (727) 562 -4865 TOA ex P\:sko FAX: -/Z7 �I I/1 9) `1 Phone: 6 bin FROM: *& S c DATE: n 6 C ZO 8 SUBJECT: l5 7 R rYl a o \e 1,b 7iDb�+'��`� MESSAGE tali NUMBER OF PAGES(INCLUDING THIS PAGE) 4 Page 1 of 1 i Everitt, Steven From: katygaudet [katygaudet @tampabay.rr.com] Sent: Friday, April 20, 2007 4:21 PM To: Everitt, Steven Subject: 1529 Maple (FLS2007- 04017) In regards to our conversation on Friday, April 20, 2007: My concerns lies with the location of the new pool house. Current zoning laws for these type of structures states they must be 10 feet from the property line and I would like the Planning Department to be consider enforcement of this statute. The current structure is now approx. 2 -3 feet from the property line (if that) and is not only an eyesore but compromises the privacy of our property. Since there is no other neighboring property that has set a precedence for this type of structure, I respectfully request the Planning Department enforce the 10 foot rule. Thank you so much for your consideration, Katy Gaudet 4/24/2007 ,W Everitt, Steven From: rick.linda [rick.linda @verizon.net] Sent: Monday, April 23, 2007 10:50 PM To: Everitt, Steven Page 1 of 1 Subject: RE: Notice of filing of an application for Flexible Standard Development Approval at 1529 Maple St (FLS2007- 04017) RE: Notice of filing of an application for Flexible Standard Development Approval at 1529 Maple St (FLS2007- 04017) Dear Mr. Everitt, We have received your notice, described above and wish to object to the application. The property owners at 1529 Maple Street have already made substantial improvements and modification which set this property apart from the rest of the neighborhood as a strange property. The approval of this application would create a property which is even more out of character with the neighborhood. The North setback, at 10 feet would be closer to the street than any other property and would stick out like a sore thumb. The setback of 1.46 feet on the west and 4 feet on the south would be a terrible imposition on the neighbors who's property abuts this property. We feel that the owners are probably trying to make this property into a compound which should be on a much larger parcel of land. We hope that you do not grant this application. Sincerely, Rick and Linda Stuart 1539 Ridgewood St. Clearwater, FL 33755 4/24/2007 Everitt, Steven • From: Rita J Garvey [rjgarvey @knology.net] Sent: Friday, April 27, 2007 6:03 PM To: Everitt, Steven Subject: FLS2007 -04017 review Steven Everitt Development Review Committee 1529 Maple Street (F1S2007- 04017) I am adamantly opposed to the variances requested for 1529 Maple Street. This property /lot is already fully developed, in fact maybe overdeveloped by our neighborhood development pattern. The purpose of setbacks is to give space between neighbors and maintain an openness to the neighborhood. The side and rear setback variances would violate that principle. I advise the members of the Development Review Committee to visit the property to see the adverse effect on our neighborhood, one of the older neighborhoods in Clearwater and still a desirable place to live. I have lived at 1550 Ridgewood Street since 1978 and do not understand how this property, this neighborhood, qualifies for "residential infill ". The requests go against the basic principles that will keep our neighborhood integrity. Rita Garvey 1550 Ridgewood Street Clearwater 446 -3845 1 �. :.l Fax Cover Memo, CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, 2ND FLOOR CLEARWATER, FL 33756 (727) 562 -4567 FAX: (727) 562 -4865 TO: Alex Plisko DATE: 04/30/07 FAX: 727 - 447 -6914 TELEPHONE: FROM: Neil Thompson TELEPHONE: (727) 562 -4557 EMAIL: neil.thompson @myclearwater.com SUBJECT: FLS2007 -04017 — 1529 Maple St. — DRC Conditions MESSAGE: NUMBER OF SHEETS (INCLUDING THIS PAGE): 2 Engineering Condition Roberta Gluski 562 -4753 04/20/2007 1. No structure(s) may be constructed within the 4 ft. rear easement. Not Met 2. Parked vehicles shall not block City sidewalk per City Ordinance Section 30..041(1)(b). 3. Driveway shall be at least 19' deep as measured from inside of sidewalk to garage to accommodate a standard sized vehicle and prevent parking on sidewalk. (Note: This will require relocation of the sidewalk closer to curb on subject site and adjacent property to north). All of the above shall be addressed prior to issuance of a Development Order. After issuance of a building permit: 1. Applicant shall obtain an Engineering Easement Inspection prior to pouring concrete foundation for the proposed pool house. General Note: DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review, additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. Environmental Condition Sarah Josuns 562 -4897 04/11/2007 No Issues. Not Met Fire Condition No Issues Not Met Harbor Master Condition Steven Everitt 562 -4547 04/26/2007 No issues. Not Met LANDSCAPE CONDITION Steven Everitt 562 -4547 04/26/2007 No issues. Not Met Legal Condition Steven Everitt 562 -4547 04/26/2007 No issues. Not Met Land Resource Condition Rick Albee 727- 562 -4741 04/17/2007 Show to be removed the 3 Chinaberry trees (U) at the SE corner as these trees have been topped Not Met to avoide the adjacent wires. Revise plan prior to building permit. Parks & Recs Condition Debbie Reid 562 -4818 04/16/2007 No issues - single family residence adding new garage and pool house. Not Met Storm Water Condition 04/18/2007 No Issues. Solid Waste Condition 04/26/2007 No.issues. Traffic Eng Condition Print Date: 04/30/2007 Phuong Vo 562 -4752 Steven Everitt 562 -4547 Bennett Elbo 562 -4775 Page 1 of 2 Not Met Not Met CaseConditons Conditions Associated WHO ` °aa ` FLS2007 -04017 ` 1529 MAPLE ST ,t >4TS Engineering Condition Roberta Gluski 562 -4753 04/20/2007 1. No structure(s) may be constructed within the 4 ft. rear easement. Not Met 2. Parked vehicles shall not block City sidewalk per City Ordinance Section 30..041(1)(b). 3. Driveway shall be at least 19' deep as measured from inside of sidewalk to garage to accommodate a standard sized vehicle and prevent parking on sidewalk. (Note: This will require relocation of the sidewalk closer to curb on subject site and adjacent property to north). All of the above shall be addressed prior to issuance of a Development Order. After issuance of a building permit: 1. Applicant shall obtain an Engineering Easement Inspection prior to pouring concrete foundation for the proposed pool house. General Note: DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review, additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. Environmental Condition Sarah Josuns 562 -4897 04/11/2007 No Issues. Not Met Fire Condition No Issues Not Met Harbor Master Condition Steven Everitt 562 -4547 04/26/2007 No issues. Not Met LANDSCAPE CONDITION Steven Everitt 562 -4547 04/26/2007 No issues. Not Met Legal Condition Steven Everitt 562 -4547 04/26/2007 No issues. Not Met Land Resource Condition Rick Albee 727- 562 -4741 04/17/2007 Show to be removed the 3 Chinaberry trees (U) at the SE corner as these trees have been topped Not Met to avoide the adjacent wires. Revise plan prior to building permit. Parks & Recs Condition Debbie Reid 562 -4818 04/16/2007 No issues - single family residence adding new garage and pool house. Not Met Storm Water Condition 04/18/2007 No Issues. Solid Waste Condition 04/26/2007 No.issues. Traffic Eng Condition Print Date: 04/30/2007 Phuong Vo 562 -4752 Steven Everitt 562 -4547 Bennett Elbo 562 -4775 Page 1 of 2 Not Met Not Met CaseConditons FLS2007 -04017 1529 MAPLE ST Traffic Eng Condition Bennett Elbo 562 -4775 04/16/2007 The driveway distance between the face of garage and back edge of sidewalk shall be 19' deep to Not Met prevent a parked vehicle from encroaching and /or /blocking the sidewalk. 2. Show 20' x 20' sight visibility triangles at the driveway. There shall be no objects in the sight triangle over the City's acceptable vertical height criteria. (City's Community Development Code, Section 3 -904). The above to be addressed prior to a Development Order (D.O.). General Note(s): 1) Applicant shall comply with the current Transportation Impact Fee Ordinance and fee schedule and paid prior to a Certificate of Occupancy (C.O.). 2) DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. Zoning Condition Steven Everitt 562 -4547 04/25/2007 Applicant shall provide evidence that the reductions of setbacks are consistent with adjacent Not Met properties. Applicant should submit copies of surveys. Staff may request the setbacks be increased to be consistent with adjacent properties. 04/26/2007 Only one dwelling unit is permitted on this site. Has this site been used as two dwelling units? Not Met May generate more conditions. Print Date: 04/30/2007 Page 2 of 2 CaseConditons i i • 1 • Apr. 30 2007 02:49PM YOUR LOGO YOUR FAX NO. 7275624865 NO. OTHER FACSIMILE START TIME USAGE TIME MODE PAGES RESULT 01 94476914 Apr.30 02:48PM 00'58 SND, 03 OK TO TURN OFF REPORT, PRESS 'MENU' #04. THEN.SELECT OFF BY USING ' +' OR FOR FAX ADVANTAGE ASSISTANCE, PLEASE CALL 1- 800 -HELP -FAX 0435- 73297. ' � i • Clearwater Ll Fax Cover Memo CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, 2ND FLOOR CLEARWATER, FL 33756 (727) 562 -4567 TO: Alex Plisko, Jr. FAX: 727 - 447 -6914 FROM: Steven Everitt FAX: (727) 562 -4865 DATE: 04/06/2007 TELEPHONE: TELEPHONE: (727) 562 -4547 EMAIL: steven.everitt @myclearwater.com SUBJECT: FLS2007- 04017 — 1529 Maple St — Letter of Completeness MESSAGE: NUMBER OF SHEETS (INCLUDING THIS PAGE): 2 0 CITY OF CLAARWATER Clearwater PLANNING DEPARTMENT MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING 0 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE: (727) 562 -4567 FAX: (727) 562 -4576 W W W . MYCLEARWATER. C OM April 06, 2007 Alex Plisko Jr 800 Drew Street Clearwater, F133755 VIA FAX: 727 - 447 -6914 RE: FLS2007 -04017 -- 1529 MAPLE ST -- Letter of Completeness Dear Alex Plisko Jr: The Planning Staff has entered your application into the Department's filing system and assigned the case number: FLS2007- 04017. After a preliminary review of the submitted documents, staff has determined that the application is complete. The Development Review Committee (DRC) will review the application for sufficiency on May 03, 2007, in the Planning Department conference room - Room 216 - on the second floor of the Municipal Services Building. The building is located at 100 South Myrtle Avenue in downtown Clearwater. You will be contacted by the Planning Department's Administrative Analyst within one week prior to the meeting date for the approximate time that your case will be reviewed. You or your representative (as applicable) must be present to answer any questions that the DRC may have regarding your application. Additional comments may be generated by the DRC at the time of the meeting. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at 562 -4547 or Steven.Everitt@myclearwater.com. Sincerely yours, Steven Everitt Planner II Letter of Completeness - FLS2007 -04017 - 1529 MAPLE ST f Apr. 06 2007 02:34PM YOUR LOGO YOUR FAX NO. : 7275624865 NO. OTHER FACSIMILE START TIME USAGE TIME1i MODE PAGES RESULT 01 94476914 Apr.06 02 :34PM 00'45 SND 02 OK TO TURN OFF REPORT, PRESS 'MENU' #04. THEN SELECT OFF BY USING ' +' OR FOR FAX ADVANTAGE ASSISTANCE, PLEASE CALL 1- 800 - HELP -FAX (435- 7329). i i j . i ' I N, F LL Clearwater 0 Fax Cover Memo, CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, 2ND FLOOR CLEARWATER, FL 33756 (727) 562 -4567 FAX: (727) 562 -4865 TO: Alex Plisko, Jr. FAX: 727 - 447 -6914 FROM: Steven Everitt DATE: 04/03/2007 TELEPHONE: TELEPHONE: (727) 562 -4547 EMAIL: steven.everitt @myclearwater.com SUBJECT: FLS2007- 04017.— 1529 Maple St — Letter of Incompleteness MESSAGE: NUMBER OF SHEETS (INCLUDING THIS PAGE): 2 '1 Clearwater April 03, 2007 Alex Plisko Jr 800 Drew Street Clearwater. Fl 33755 CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE: (727) 562 -4567 FAX: (727) 562 -4576 W W W .MYCLEARWATER. COM VIA FAX: 727 - 447 -6914 RE: FLS2007 -04017 -- 1529 MAPLE ST -- Letter of Incompleteness Dear Alex Plisko Jr : The Planning Staff has entered your application into the Department's filing system and assigned the case number: FLS2007- 04017. After a preliminary review of the submitted documents, staff has determined that the application is Incomplete with the following comments. 1. Page 4 - Site Plan Submittal Requirements - Provide 20'x 20' sight visibility triangles adjacent to driveway. 2. Page 4 - Site Plan Submittal Requirements - Provide footprint and size of all proposed buildings and structures. Please provide the dimensions of the "New Pool House" on the Site Plan. 3. Page 5 - Building Elevation Plan Submittal Requirements - Provide the height of "new garage" measured from grade to midline of main roof. 4. Page 5 - Building Elevation Plan Submittal Requirements - Provide the height of the "New Pool House" measured from grade to midline of main roof. Section 4 -202 of the Community Development Code states that if an application is deemed incomplete, the deficiencies of the application shall be specified by Staff. No further development review action shall be taken until the deficiencies are corrected and the application is deemed complete. Please resubmit by 10 am on Tuesday, April 10, 2007. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at 562 -4547 or Steven.Everitt@myclearwater.com. Sincerely yours, Lf y. Steven Everitt Planner H Letter of /ncompleteness - FLS2007 -040/7 - 1529 MAPLE ST Apr. 03 2007 04:31PM YOUR LOGO' YOUR FAX NO. 7275624865 NO. OTHER FACSIMILE :START TIME USAGE TIME MODE PAGES RESULT 01 94476914 'Apr.03 04:31PM 00'46 SND 02 OK TO TURN OFF REPORT, PRESS 'MENU' #04. THEN SELECT OFF BY USING ' +' OR FOR FAX ADVANTAGE ASSISTANCE, PLEASE CALL 1- 800 -HELP -FAX C435- 7329]. i j ' 1 j j i I i i I a :�� . �� s � r � ,; � A � � � ��i+ �'� ,� �i ,� ;�', � St �� _ bbb- I'- L-1 r 'R( i` .w ow t Via^, AAY:, Af F. ,, RF 4 W17 it Jlti 2a. I VAIL r° 01 y� ' -''-----�'--- +/ ' Pfopery Appraiser General Information: 11/29/? /31194/000/1120 C... http://www.pcpao.01.1—'2eneral radet.php?pn=1529113119400011201 Interactive Map of Comparable Sales Back to Query New Tax Collector Question/Comment about this parcel Listing Results Search Information this page 11/29/15/31194/000 /1120 Building 1 Data Current as of April 01, 2007 [2:44 pra Friday April 6] Residential Property Owner, Address, and Sales Print Single Family Property Use: 210 Living Units: 1 GLENWOOD LOT 112 2006 Exemptions Homestead: No Use: 100 % Ownership: 100 % Tax Exempt: 0 % Government: No Institutional: No Agricultural: $0 Historic: $0 m 2006 Value Value Added over Cap Comparable Sales value based on sales from 2004 -2005: $470,000 Just/Market Value: $402,800 Assessed Value/ SOH Cap: $259,074 History Taxable Value: $234,074' A significant taxable value increase may occur when sold. Click here for details. Owner /Mailing Property Address Address SHERMAN, ALDEN SHERMAN, LAURA 1529 MAPLE ST 1529 MAPLE ST CLEARWATER FL 33755 Parcel Information Book/Page: Land Use: Single Family, 14953/0601 (01) Census Tract: Evacuation Zone: 265.00 NON -EVAC 2006 Tax Information Tax District: CW Millage: 21.7640'' Special Tax: $.00'. Taxes: $5,094.39!. Taxes without Save - Our -Homes cap: $8,222.44. Taxes without any exemptions: $8,766.54'. Sale Date Book/Page 2/2006 14953/601 8/1995 9076/2 190 1/1992 7788/1451 1978 4784/1587 Plat Year 1924 Price Q/U V/I $570,000 Q I $145,000 Q I $124,000 Q I $58,000 Q I Plat Book/Page(s) 008/01.4 1 of 4 4/6/2007 2:44 PM Ptoperty Appraiser General Information: 11/29/31194/000 /1120 C... http: / /www.pcpao. eneral _ radet.php ?pn = 1529113119400011201 Land Information Seawall: No Frontage: None View: Land Use Land Size Unit Value Units Method Single Family(01) 80 x 118 2,250.00 80.00 F Foundation: Continuous Wall Floor System: Wood Exterior Wall: Frame /Stucco Roof Frame: Gable -Hip Roof Cover: Clay Tile /Glazed 2 Stories Floor Finish: Carpet/Hard Tile /Hardwood/Marble /Parquet Interior Finish: Upgrade Fixtures: 12 Quality: Above Average Year Built: 1925 Effective Age: 20 Heating: Central Duct Cooling: Cooling (Central) Other Depreciation: 0 Functional Depreciation: 0 Economic Depreciation: 0 9 Structural Elements Open plot in New Window View Floor: 1 2 Help 2 of 4 4/6/2007 2:44 PM Property Appraiser General Information: 11/2931194/000/1120 C... http:// www .pcpao.;general_radet.php ?pn= 1529113119400011201 3 of 4 4/6/2007 2:44 PM Sub Area Information Description Living Area Ft Gross Area Ft Factor Effective Ft2 Base Area 2,047 2,047 1.00 2,047 Upper Story Finished 1,299 1,299 .90 1,169 Open Porch. Finished 12 .20 2 Utility Room Unfinished 63 .25 16 Total Living SF: 3,346 Total Gross SF: 3,421 Total Effective SF: 3,234 Residential Extra Features Description Dimensions Value/Unit Units Total NewValue Depreciated Value Year Patio/Deck 350SF $12.00 350 $4,200.00 $1,680.00 1965 Fireplace $2,500.00 1 $2,500.00 $1,000.00 1925 Patio /Deck 560SF $9.50 560 $5,320.00 $4,420.00 2000 Spa/Jacuzzi /Hot Tub $9,000.00 1 $9,000.00 $7,470.00 2000 Pool $24,000.00 1 $24,000.00 $19,920.00 2000 3 of 4 4/6/2007 2:44 PM Pfoperty Appraiser General Information: 11/2931194/000/1120 C... http: / /www.pcpao.eneral radet.php ?pn= 1529113119400011201 Interactive Map of Comparable Sales Back to Query New Tax Collector Question/Comment about this parcel Listing Results Search Information this page 4 of 4 4/6/2007 2:44 PM CITY OF CLE.ARWATER POST OFFICE BOX 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758 -4748 MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTI:E AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562 -4567 FAX (727) 562 -4865 PLANNING DEPARTMENT July 2, 2007 Mr. Daniel P. Uebler Plisko.Architecture, P.A. 800 Drew St. Clearwater, FL 33755 RE: Development Order regarding case FLS2007 -04017 at 1529 Maple St. (Sherman Res.) Dear Mr. Uebler: This letter constitutes a Development Order pursuant to Section 4 -202.E of the Community Development Code. On May 3, 2007, the Development Review Committee (DRC) reviewed your application for Flexible Standard Development approval for front, side and rear setback reductions ' l� associated with garage and pool house additions to a single - family residence, in the LMDR zoning Q t district. The request was for reductions to the front (north) setback from 25 feet to 10.3 feet to garage face, side (west) from 5 feet to 1.4 feet to garage and rear (south) from 5 feet to 4 feet to accessory 1 g� (pool house) structure as a residential infill project, per section 2- 203.C. The DRC requested 1, modifications and upon receipt of the resubmitted materials recommended approval of the application with the following bases and conditions:. Bases for App r oval: 1. The proposal complies with Residential Infill Project criteria under the provisions of Section 2- 203. C; 2. The plan complies with General Applicability Criteria under the provisions of Section 3 -913; and 3. The proposed development is compatibl6 with the surrounding area. (~nnrliti nn o 1. Pool house shall meet required rear setback of 5 feet. 2. Damaged Chinaberry trees (3) be removed, show on building permit submittals. 3. Reconfigure sidewalk to permit 19 -foot space between garage door face and sidewalk to eliminate pedestrian conflict with vehicle parked in front of garage. Right of way permits required. 4. Record "Declaration of Restricted Covenant" with Pinellas County, limiting the use of the property as single - family residence. FRANK HIBBARD, MAYOR. SAPlanning Departme4eFD &P1WSW39AQkVEN active or Finished Cases\Maple 1529 - S44aP -QX# bW1*M9ple 1529 Development BILL JONSON, COUNCILMEMBER Or C CAREEN A. PETERSEN, COUNCILMEMBER "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER" July 2, 2007 Page 2 - Sherman I concur with the findings of the Development Review Committee and, through this letter, approve your application for Flexible Standard Development with the above four condition. The approval is based on and must adhere to the submitted application and revised site plan dated received May 29, 2007. Pursuant to Section 4 -303, an application for a building permit shall be made within one year of this Flexible Standard Development approval (July 2, 2008). All required certificates of occupancy shall be obtained within one year of the date of issuance of the building permit. Time frames do not change with successive owners. The issuance. of this Development Order does not relieve you of the necessity to obtain any building permits or pay any impact fees that may be required. In order to facilitate the issuance of any permits affected by this approval, please bring a copy of this letter with you when applying. Pursuant to Section 4- 502.A, an appeal may be initiated within seven days of the date the Development Order is issued by an applicant or property owners within the required notice area and who presented competent substantial evidence in the Level One review. A copy of the Development Order is being sent to those surrounding property owners who presented competent substantial evidence in the Level One review. The filing of an application/notice of appeal shall stay the effect of the decision pending the final determination of the case. The appeal period for your case will expire on July 9, 2007 (seven days from date of Development Order). If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call Neil Thompson, Development Review Manager, at 727 -562 -4557 or neil.thompson@myclearwater.com. Sincerely, Michael Delk, AIC Planning Director S APlanning Department \C D B\Flex Standard (FLS) \Inactive or Finished Cases\Maple 1529 - Sherman (LMDR) - Approved\Maple 1529 Development Order.doc Everitt, Steven From: Rita J Garvey [rjgarvey @knology.net] Sent: Friday, April 27, 2007 6:03 PM To: Everitt, Steven Subject: FLS2007 -04017 review Steven Everitt Development Review Committee 1529 Maple Street (F1S2007- 04017) I am adamantly opposed to the variances requested for 1529 Maple Street. This property /lot is already fully developed, in fact maybe overdeveloped by our neighborhood development pattern. The purpose of setbacks is to give space between neighbors and maintain an openness to the neighborhood. The side and rear setback variances would violate that principle. I advise the members of the Development Review Committee to visit the property to see the adverse effect on our neighborhood, one of the older neighborhoods in Clearwater and still a desirable place to live. I have lived at 1550 Ridgewood Street since 1978 and do not understand how this property, this neighborhood, qualifies for "residential infill ". The requests go against the basic principles that will keep our neighborhood integrity. Rita Garvey 1550 Ridgewood Street Clearwater 446 -3845 1 0 Everitt, Steven From: Everitt, Steven Sent: Monday, April 23, 2007 11:40 AM To: 'rjgarvey @knology.net' Subject: FLS2007 -04017 - 1529 Maple Street • Ms. Garvey, Attached are the definition of Residential Infill Project and the Low Medium Density Residential zoning district code. Steven Everitt Planner II Planning Department City of Clearwater, FL 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, FL 33758 Tel: (727) 562 -4547 Fax: (727) 562 -4796 Residential Infill Project and... 0 • Residential infill project means a development approved pursuant to flexibility criteria that allow the development of properties which due to unique conditions or historical patterns of development and ownership could not otherwise be developed. DIVISION 2. LOW MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT ( "LMDR ") Section 2 -201. Intent and purpose. The intent and purpose of the Low Medium Density Residential District ( "LMDR ") is to protect and preserve the integrity and value of existing, stable residential neighborhoods of low to medium density while at the same time, allowing a careful and deliberate redevelopment and revitalization of such neighborhoods in need of revitalization or neighborhoods with unique amenities which create unique opportunities to increase property values and the overall attractiveness of the City. Section 2- 201.1. Maximum development potential. The Low Medium Density Residential District ( "LMDR ") may be located in more than one land use category. It is the intent of the LMDR District that development be consistent with the Countywide Future Land Use Plan as required by State law. The development potential of a parcel of land within the LMDR District shall be determined by the standards found in this Development Code as well as the Countywide Future Land Use Designation of the property. Development potential for the Countywide Future Land Use Designations that apply to the LMDR District are as follows: TABLE INSET: Countywide Future Land Maximum Dwelling Units Maximum Floor Area Ratio /hnper- vious Surface Use Designation per Acre of Land Ratio Residential Low 5 dwelling units per acre FAR .40 /ISR .65 Residential Urban 7.5 dwelling units per FFAR.40/ISR.65 Street acre (sq. ft.) (Ord. No. 6526 -00, § 1, 6- 15 -00; Ord. No. 7449 -05, § 3, 12- 15 -05) Section 2 -202. Minimum standard development. The following uses are Level One permitted uses in the LMDR District subject to the minimum standards set out in this section and other applicable provisions of Article 3. TABLE INSET: Table 2 -202. "LMDR" District Minimum Standard Development Min. Lot Min. Lot Max. Min. Off - se Size Width Min. Setbacks (ft.) Height Street (sq. ft.) (ft.) (ft.) Parking Front Side Rear(1) (1) Waterfront detached dwellings in LMDR District should be 25 feet except as provided in Article 3 Division 8, Section 3 -805 and Division 9, Section 3 -904 and except where adjacent structures on either side of the parcel proposed for development are setback 20 feet and then the rear setback shall be 20 feet. The Building Code may require the rear setback to be at least 18 feet from a seawall. GRAPHIC LINK:LMDR Minimum Standard Development Diagram (Ord. No. 6417 -99, § 2, 8- 19 -99; Ord. No. 6526 -00, § 1, 6- 15 -00; Ord. No. 6928 -02, §§ 4, 5, 5 -2 -02; Ord. No. 7449 -05, §§ 4, 5, 12- 15 -05; Ord. No. 7631 -06, § 20, 11 -2 -06) Section 2 -203. Flexible standard development. The following Level One uses are permitted in the LMDR District subject to the standards and criteria set out in this Section and other applicable regulations in Article 3. TABLE INSET: Table 2 -203. "LMDR" District Flexible Standard Development Min. Lot in' Max. Min. Off - se Community 5,000 in. Setbacks (ft.) Height Street (sq. ft.) Residential Homes (ft.) 50 25 5 10 30 2 /unit (up to 6 residents) Front Side Rear(1) Detached 5,000 50 25 5 10 30 2 /unit Dwellings Detached Dwellings 5,000 50 25 5 5 - -15 30 (1) Waterfront detached dwellings in LMDR District should be 25 feet except as provided in Article 3 Division 8, Section 3 -805 and Division 9, Section 3 -904 and except where adjacent structures on either side of the parcel proposed for development are setback 20 feet and then the rear setback shall be 20 feet. The Building Code may require the rear setback to be at least 18 feet from a seawall. GRAPHIC LINK:LMDR Minimum Standard Development Diagram (Ord. No. 6417 -99, § 2, 8- 19 -99; Ord. No. 6526 -00, § 1, 6- 15 -00; Ord. No. 6928 -02, §§ 4, 5, 5 -2 -02; Ord. No. 7449 -05, §§ 4, 5, 12- 15 -05; Ord. No. 7631 -06, § 20, 11 -2 -06) Section 2 -203. Flexible standard development. The following Level One uses are permitted in the LMDR District subject to the standards and criteria set out in this Section and other applicable regulations in Article 3. TABLE INSET: Table 2 -203. "LMDR" District Flexible Standard Development Min. Lot in' Max. Min. Off - se Size °t Width in. Setbacks (ft.) Height Street (sq. ft.) (ft.) Parking Front Side Rear(1) Attached Dwellings 10,000 100 25 10 15 30 2 /unit Detached Dwellings 5,000 50 25 5 5 - -15 30 2 /unit Residentiallnfill n/a n/a 10 -- 0 - -5 0 - -15 30 2 /unit Projects(3) 25 Utility /Infrastructure n/a n/a 25 10 15 n/a n/a Facilities(2) (1) Waterfront detached dwellings in LMDR District should be 25 feet except as provided in Article 3 Division 8, section 3 -805 and Division 9, section 3 -904 and except where adjacent structures on either side of the parcel proposed for development are setback 20 feet and then the rear setback shall be 20 feet. The Building Code may require the rear setback to be at least 18 feet from any seawall. r (2) Utility /infrt ucture uses shall not exceed three acres. Any such use, alone or when added to contiguous like uses which exceed three acres shall require a land use plan map amendment to Transportation which shall include such uses and all contiguous like uses. (3) The development standards for residential infill projects are guidelines and may be varied based on the criteria set forth in Section 2- 203(C). Flexibility Criteria: A. Attached dwellings. 1. The parcel proposed for development is a corner lot and is vacant on the date of adoption of this Development Code; 2. The buildings are designed with front setbacks on both streets; 3. Off - street parking is screened from adjacent parcels of land by a landscaped wall or fence of at least four feet in height; 4. No more than two of the front doors of the dwelling units front on a single street; 5. The development of the attached dwellings does not require the removal of a protected tree; 6. The dwelling units are contained in no more than two buildings; 7. The buildings are consistent with the architectural style of existing dwellings in the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development; 8. The parcel proposed for development is not located in a designated Neighborhood Conservation District, or if the parcel is within the boundaries of a designated Neighborhood Conservation District, the lot area, lot width and setbacks are not less than 90 percent of the average lot area, lot width and setbacks of all improved parcels of land which are located within the Neighborhood Conservation Immediate Vicinity Area and the height does not exceed 120 percent of the average height of buildings and structures located within the Neighborhood Conservation Immediate Vicinity Area. B. Detached dwellings. 1. Front setback: a. A determination of the front setback shall consider the extent to which existing structures in the neighborhood have been constructed to a regular or uniform set back from the right -of -way; b. The reduction in front setback will not adversely affect adjacent property values. c. The reduction in front setback is consistent with neighborhood character; and d. The reduction in front setback results in an efficient house layout. 2. Rear setback: a. The reduction in rear setback will allow for the preservation of existing vegetation which could not otherwise be preserved; or b. The reduction in rear setback will allow the development or redevelopment of a substandard lot which would otherwise not be feasible; or c. The reduction results in an efficient house layout; and d. The structures located within the rear setback otherwise required in the LMDR District are buffered with landscape material or fences to protect the privacy and value of adjacent properties. 3. Side setback: The reduction in side setback will allow for the preservation of existing vegetation which could not otherwise be preserved. C. Residential infill projects: 1. Single- family detached dwellings are the only permitted use eligible for residential infill project application; 2. The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development is otherwise impractical without deviations from one or more of the following: intensity; other development standards; 3. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a residential infill project will not materially reduce the fair market value of abutting properties; 4. The uses within the residential infill project are otherwise permitted in the district; 5. The uses within the residential infill project are compatible with adjacent land uses; 6. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a residential infill project will upgrade the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development; 7. The design of the proposed residential infill project creates a form and function which enhances the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole; 8. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height, off - street parking access or other development standards are justified by the benefits to community character and the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. D. Utility /infrastructure facilities. 1. No above ground structures are located adjacent to a street right -of -way; 2. Any above ground structure other than permitted telecommunication towers and utility distribution lines located on or along a rear lot line shall be screened from view by a landscaped opaque wall or fence which is at least two- thirds the height of the above ground structure and shall be landscaped with trees and hedges which five years after installation will substantially obscure the fence or wall and the above ground structure. (Ord. No. 6526 -00, § 1, 6- 15 -00; Ord. No. 6680 -01, § 2, 4 -5 -01; Ord. No. 7413 -05, § 3, 5 -5 -05; Ord. No. 7449 -05, § 38, 12- 15 -05; Ord. No. 7605 -06, § 21, 4- 20 -06) Section 2 -204. Flexible development. The following Level Two uses are permitted in the LMDR District subject to the standards and criteria set out in this section andother applicable regulations in Article 3. TABLE INSET: Table 2 -204. "LMDR" District Flexible Development Min. Lot Min. Max. Min. Off - Street Use Size Lot Min. Setbacks (ft.) Height parking (sq. ft.) Width (ft.) (1) Waterfront detached dwellings in LMDR District should be 25 feet except as provided in Article 3 Division 8, Section 3 -805 and Division 9, Section 3 -904 and except where adjacent structures on either side of the parcel proposed for development are setback 20 feet and then the rear setback shall be 20 feet. The Building Code may require the rear setback to be at least 18 feet from a seawall. (2) The development standards for residential infill projects areguidelines and may be varied based on the criteria specified in Section 2- 204(E). Flexibility Criteria: A. Attached dwellings. 1. The parcel proposed for development is a corner lot and is vacant on the date of adoption of this Development Code; 2. The buildings are designed with front setbacks on both streets; 3. Off - street parking is screened from adjacent parcels of land by a landscaped wall or fence of at least four feet in height; 4. No more than two dwelling units front on a single street; 5. The development of attached dwellings does not require the removal of a protected tree; 6. The dwelling units are contained in no more than two buildings; (ft.) Front Side Rear(1) Attached 10,000 100 25 5 15 30 2 /unit Dwellings Detached 3,000 -- 25 -- 15 -- 2 - -5 5 - -15 30 2 /unit Dwellings g 5,000 50 25 Non - Residential n/a n/a 25 10 10 n/a n/a Off - Street Parking 1 per 20,000 SF land area or as determined Parks and by the community Recreation n/a n/a 35 20 25 30 development director Facilities based on ITE Manual standards Residential -- 0 - -5 Infill n/a n/a 20 0 - -15 30 2 /unit Proj ects(2) Schools 40,000 200 35 25 15 30 1/3 students (1) Waterfront detached dwellings in LMDR District should be 25 feet except as provided in Article 3 Division 8, Section 3 -805 and Division 9, Section 3 -904 and except where adjacent structures on either side of the parcel proposed for development are setback 20 feet and then the rear setback shall be 20 feet. The Building Code may require the rear setback to be at least 18 feet from a seawall. (2) The development standards for residential infill projects areguidelines and may be varied based on the criteria specified in Section 2- 204(E). Flexibility Criteria: A. Attached dwellings. 1. The parcel proposed for development is a corner lot and is vacant on the date of adoption of this Development Code; 2. The buildings are designed with front setbacks on both streets; 3. Off - street parking is screened from adjacent parcels of land by a landscaped wall or fence of at least four feet in height; 4. No more than two dwelling units front on a single street; 5. The development of attached dwellings does not require the removal of a protected tree; 6. The dwelling units are contained in no more than two buildings; 0 0 7. The buildings are consistent with the architectural style of existing dwellings in the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development; 8. The parcel proposed for development is not located in a designated Neighborhood Conservation District; or if the parcel is within the boundaries of a designated Neighborhood Conservation District, the lot area, lot width and setbacks are not less than 90 percent of the average lot area, lot width and setbacks of all improved parcels of land which are located within the Neighborhood Conservation Immediate Vicinity Area and the height does not exceed 120 percent of the average height of buildings and structures located within the Neighborhood Conservation Immediate Vicinity Area. B. Detached dwellings. 1. Minimum lot size per dwelling of less than 5,000 square feet is an existing lot or a lot size of less than 5,000 square feet is necessary to the development or redevelopment of a vacant lot which would otherwise not be economically feasible; 2. Access is provided to each lot by frontage on a public street or by an easement of access at least 15 feet in width; 3. The volume to lot size ratio of the structures to be developed on the lot is no more than ten percent greater than the average volume to lot size ratio of all existing structures within 500 feet of the lot; 4. Front setback: a. The existing structures along the same side of the road have been constructed with irregular setbacks and the proposed reduction in front setback will not be out of character with the neighborhood; b. The extent to which existing structures in the neighborhood have been constructed to a regular or uniform set back from the right -of -way; c. The reduction in front setback will not adversely affect adjacent property values; 5. Rear setback: a. The reduction in rear setback will allow for the preservation of existing vegetation which could not otherwise be preserved; or b. The reduction in rear setback will allow the development or redevelopment of a substandard structure which would otherwise not be feasible; or c. The reduction results in an efficient house layout. 6. Side setback: The reduction in side setback will allow for the preservation of existing vegetation which could not otherwise be preserved. C. Non - residential off - street parking. 1. The parcel proposed for development is contiguous to the parcel on which the non- residential use which will be served by the off - street parking spaces, is located and has a common boundary of at least 25 feet, or the parcel proposed for development is located immediately across a public road from the non - residential use which will be served by the off - street parking spaces, provided that access to the off - street parking does not involve the use of local streets which have residential units on both sides ofthe street. 2. No off - street parking spaces are located in the required front setback for detached dwellings in the LMDR District or within ten feet, whichever is greater, or within ten feet of a side or rear lot line, except along the common boundary of the parcel proposed for development Pd the parcel on which the non - residential use which will be served by the off - street parking spaces. 3. Off - street parking spaces are screened by a wall or fence of at least three feet in height which is landscaped on the external side with a continuous hedge or non - deciduous vine. 4. All outdoor lighting is automatically switched to turn off at 9:00 p.m. 5. All parking spaces shall be surface parking. D. Parks and recreation facilities. 1. The proposed use is compatible with the surrounding properties. 2. Off - street parking is screened from adjacent parcels of land and any street by a landscaped wall or fence of at least four feet in height. 3. All outdoor lighting is designed so that no light fixtures cast light directly on adjacent land used for residential purposes. 4. The characteristics of the parcel proposed for development are such that the uses of the property will require fewer parking spaces than otherwise required or that the use of significant portions of the property will be use for passive recreational purposes. E. Residential infill projects. 1. The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development is otherwise impractical without deviations from one or more of the following: intensity; other development standards; 2. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a residential infill project will not materially reduce the fair market value of abutting properties; 3. The uses within the residential infill project are otherwise permitted in the district; 4. The uses within the residential infill project are compatible with adjacent land uses; 5. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a residential infill project will upgrade the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development; 6. The design of the proposed residential infill project creates a form and function which enhances the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole; 7. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height, off - street parking, access or other development standards are justified by the benefits to community character and the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. F. Schools. 1. The parcel proposed for development fronts on a major arterial street; 2. All off - street parking is located at least 200 feet from any property used for residential purposes or is designated as residential in the Zoning Atlas; 3. All outdoor lighting is designed and located so that no light fixture is within 200 feet from the nearest existing building used for residential purposes and so that no light falls on residential property. (Ord. No. 6526 -00, § 1, 6- 15 -00; Ord. No. 6595 -00, § 2, 9 -7 -00; Ord. No. 7413 -05, § 4, 5 -5 -05; Ord. No. 7449 -05, § 38, 12- 15 -05; Ord. No. 7605 -06, § 22, 4- 20 -06) h J Everitt, Steven From: Everitt, Steven Sent: Monday, April 23, 2007 11:40 AM To: 'rjgarvey @knology.net' Subject: FLS2007 -04017 - 1529 Maple Street Ms. Garvey, Attached are the definition of Residential Infill Project and the Low Medium Density Residential zoning district code. Steven Everitt Planner II Planning Department City of Clearwater, FL 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, FL 33758 Tel: (727) 562 -4547 Fax: (727) 562 -4796 Residential Infill Project and... Page 1 of 1 Everitt, Steven From: rick.linda [rick.linda @verizon.net] Sent: Monday, April 23, 2007 10:50 PM To: Everitt, Steven Subject: RE: Notice of filing of an application for Flexible Standard Development Approval at 1529 Maple St (FLS2007- 04017) RE: Notice of filing of an application for Flexible Standard Development Approval at 1529 Maple St (FLS2007- 04017) Dear Mr. Everitt, We have received your notice, described above and wish to object to the application. The property owners at 1529 Maple Street have already made substantial improvements and modification which set this property apart from the rest of the neighborhood as a strange property. The approval of this application would create a property which is even more out of character with the neighborhood. The North setback, at 10 feet would be closer to the street than any other property and would stick out like a sore thumb. The setback of 1.46 feet on the west and 4 feet on the south would be a terrible imposition on the neighbors who's property abuts this property. We feel that the owners are probably trying to make this property into a compound which should be on a much larger parcel of land. We hope that you do not grant this application. Sincerely, Rick and Linda Stuart 1539 Ridgewood St. Clearwater, FL 33755 4/24/2007 0 0 Page 1 of 1 Everitt, Steven From: katygaudet [katygaudet @tampabay.rr.com] Sent: Friday, April 20, 2007 5:50 PM To: Everitt, Steven Subject: RE: 1529 Maple (FLS2007- 04017) . Yes, a tree was cut down. Also, I would like to add that although 10 feet is optimal, I would rather see a new structure built than to have the present structure stay. It really is an eyesore and the new structure would certainly be an improvement — or at least, we would hope so! Any chance we could view the plans? Do you know if there any elevation drawings? It would be nice to see what we're going to be gazing at from our patio. Thanks for the information! Katy Gaudet From: Steven.Everitt @myClearwater.com [ mailto: Steven.Everitt@myClearwater.com] Sent: Friday, April 20, 2007 2:55 PM To: katygaudet @tampabay.rr.com Subject: RE: 1529 Maple (FLS2007- 04017) Ms. Gaudet, I will add this letter to the file. I forgot to ask you while we speaking on the phone, Was a tree cut down recently at 1529 Maple near the rear property line? Steven Everitt Planner II Planning Department City of Clearwater, FL 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, FL 33758 Tel: (727) 562 -4547 Fax: (727) 562 -4796 - - - -- Original Message---- - From: katygaudet [mailto :katygaudet @tampabay.rr.com] Sent: Friday, April 20, 2007 4:21 PM To: Everitt, Steven Subject: 1529 Maple (FLS2007- 04017) In regards to our conversation on Friday, April 20, 2007: My concerns lies with the location of the new pool house. Current zoning laws for these type of structures states they must be 10 feet from the property line and I would like the Planning Department to be consider enforcement of this statute. The current structure is now approx. 2 -3 feet from the property line (if that) and is not only an eyesore but compromises the privacy of our property. Since there is no other neighboring property that has set a precedence for this type of structure, I respectfully request the Planning Department enforce the 10 foot rule. Thank you so much for your consideration, Katy Gaudet 4/25/2007 6 0 Page 1 of 1 Everitt, Steven From: katygaudet [katygaudet @tampabay.rr.com] Sent: Friday, April 20, 2007 4:21 PM To: Everitt, Steven Subject: 1529 Maple (FLS2007- 04017) In regards to our conversation on Friday, April 20, 2007: My concerns lies with the location of the new pool house. Current zoning laws for these type of structures states they must be 10 feet from the property line and I would like the Planning Department to be consider enforcement of this statute. The current structure is now approx. 2 -3 feet from the property line (if that) and is not only,an eyesore but compromises the privacy of our property. Since there is no other neighboring property that has set a precedence for this type of structure, I respectfully request the Planning Department enforce the 10 foot rule. Thank you so much for your consideration, Katy Gaudet 4/24/2007 CITY OF CLEARWATER ��PF qw5i;w" PLANNING DEPARTMENT ' Posr OFmcE Box 4748 oc� T • ' $00-308 CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 3375&4748 - w�i 000 229492 APR19 2007 o LL MAILED 'FROM ZIP CODE 33602 LOEHWING, RUDI LOEHWING, CLAIRE 1560 RIDGEWOOD ST RECEIVED CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 5748 APR 2 ro' 200 �II ,.... -__ . -.._.. ,.. P€JN€N €NGDEpARTMENT.,.....__._ - ._- • - - -. _.....�.. ;..._... _..._.r ....107`- CffyOF CLEARWATER NIXIE .��7.. .� .. 'Z54%�2.�Y'07 RETURN TO ATTEMPTED - UNABLE TO SENDER NOT KNOWN FORWARD BC: 33758474848 *2374- 03334 -23 -18 �.Im® 9 CITY OF CLEARWATER lQ PLkfqNWG DEPARTMENT POST OITICE Box 4748 CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 337584748 i I --r- r- )17-r LAP2'17 1 R 2.5 "u CITY OF CLEARW�—L�---' uj< ATNEY UOVVFS 0 oil- 02 1M $00-308 UJ 40 0004229492 APR 19 2007 , IN MAILED FROM ZIP CODE 33602 BARANET, ! IZABETH 695 SNUG I CLEARWATE FL 33767 - 1830 RETURN TO NOT DELIVERABLE UNABLE TO BC:, 33750474049 0 04/23107 SENDER AS ADDRESSED FORWARD *2474-05405-23-19 1.11 )Jill Ill Jill . 1111.1'HIJ111111 CITY OF CLEARWATER o: PLANNING DEMK MENT _ Q• JTEP,E° Posr OFFICE Box 4748 CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748 0 APR 2 5 2007 `. 1 CI-EARWA-i :. 0 f W N F� �U Off, UJ N co CK o: n u- WITZ, MITCHEL WITZ, MARTHA L 1515 MAPLE ST CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 5728 AR 2 (0, , Wiv P17'N!V BOWES 02 1M $ 00.30$ 0004229492 APR19 2007 MAILED FROM ZIPCODE 33802 NIXIE 337 1 RETURN TO ATTEMPTED - UNABLE TO BC: 33750474948 07 04/2Z/07 SENDER NOT KNOWN FORWARD *2474- 00566 -23 -18 CITY OF CLEARWATER zf RTM PI.ANNWG DEPA NT Q• POST OFFICE Box 4748 CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748 rp APR 2 5 2007 s � DEt E�w`�NF'i'•1!'•i�;� �;:,�:-��:�8 @4748 ; 0 Ewc � � RIMY BOWES o $ 00.308 0 02 1M tuo 0004229492 APR 1 9 2007 au. MAILED FROM ZIPCODE 33602 BIER, NELSON M 1531 MAPLE ST CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 5730 NIXIE 337 1 RETURN TO ATTEMPTED - UNABLE TO BC: 33758474848 00 04/23/07 SENDER NOT KNOWN FORWARD *2474- 00563 -23 -18 4`. CITY OF CLEARWATER •Y PLANNMG DEPARTMENT e 9TEgE ' POST OITICE Box 4748 CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748 nD ' APR 2 5 2007 C.7(:4f i_i.:J �Itiwi�d Y SLi i'v is � _..� •i C! c Y OF CLEAMb1IATE:'r4 4 � o�PI ou 02 1M $ 00.308 w r 000 229492 APR 1 9 2007 CL LLAAIiI =D FROM ZIP CODE 33602 MINKOFF, DAVID I MINKOFF, SUSAN S 404 EDGEWOOD AVE CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 5705 NIXIE 337 1 RETURN TO ATTEMPTED - UNABLE TO BC: 33758474848 07 04/23107 SENDER NOT KNOWN FORWARD �d474- OOr�•'6� -23 -18 CITY OF CLEARWATER o: PLANNING DEPARMNT 99KgTE(tE��, Posr OFFICE Box 4748 CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758 -4748 �R a l i F APR 2 3- 2 7 vL s � 1 CITY C't= :;LEAS"-_. y ? �o 0� $ 03.308 0 2 1 ivl wo 0004229492 APR 19 2007 as MAIiEDFROMZIPCODE 33602 EISENMAN, CHRISTOPHER R 410 N GLENWOOD AVE CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 5709 E:AHF= •I••41*-IZ: Z; :,-Z71t- 1@4740 337 NO 1 606 1 07 04/20107 RETURN TO SENDER ESSENMAN MOVED LEFT NO ADDRESS UNABLE TO FORWARD RETURN TO SENDER BC: 337594474040 *2574- 03726 -20 -29 111 1111111111111111111 ,111111 till 111111 ,111111111,111111111111 1< AI LL CITY OF CLEARWATER ° e 'rwater PLANNING DEPARTMENT MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING 0 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE: (727) 562 -4567 FAX: (727) 562 -4576 W W W.MYCLEARWATER.COM April 13, 2007 RE: NOTICE OF FILING OF AN APPLICATION FOR FLEXIBLE STANDARD DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL AT 1529 MAPLE ST (FLS2007- 04017) To Surrounding Property Owners: As a property owner within 500 feet of 1529 MAPLE ST, the City of Clearwater Planning Department gives notice that an application for Flexible Standard Development approval to permit a reduction, to an existing Detached Dwelling Use (Single Family Residence), to the front (north) setback from 25 feet to 10.02 feet, a reduction to the side (west) setback from 5 feet to 1.46 feet, and a reduction to the rear (south) setback from 10 feet to 4 feet for an accessory structure (pool house) as a Residential Infill Project in the Low Medium Density Residential (L.MDR) District under the provisions of Section 2- 203.C. and to permit an increase to the permitted gross floor area of an accessory structure from 10 percent (444.3 square feet) to 10.26 percent (456 square feet) of the principle use under the provisions of Section 3- 201.13. of the Community Development Code. On May 03, 2007, the Development Review Committee (composed of the City's professional star will review and determine whether the application demonstrates compliance with the City's Community Development Code. Following that review and determiniation, the Planning Director will issue a Development Order approving, approving with conditions, or denying the application. The earliest date that the City will make a decision on the application will be May 03, 2007. The City encourages you to participate in the review of this application. You may contact me at 562 -4547 or Steven.Everitt@myclearwater.com for further information, visit our office to review the files and/or submit written comments to be considered in the City's review of the application. Please be advised that the applicant may submit additional or new information regarding this case; which you may review during regular business hours. However, no further notice will be provided to you should the application be amended. An appeal of the decision of the Planning Director may be initiated by the applicant or property owners within the required notice area who present competent substantial evidence at, or prior to, the Development Review Committee meeting on May 03, 2007. An appeal must be filed, including an appeal fee, with the Planning Department within seven days of the date of the Development Order. Thank you for your interest in the City of Clearwater's development review process. You may access our Planning Department through the City's website: www.myclearwater.com. Sincerely yours, Steven Everitt Planner H �I I AKE, BRIAN C `1 17 N HIGHLAND AVE CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 5418 MAPLE ST TRUST 716 N 35TH ST SEATTLE WA 98103 - 8803 MORGAN, DARNELL MORGAN, SASHA 417 N HIGHLAND AVE CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 5716 LORD, LESLIE MICHELL LORD, STEPHANIE ANNE 1640 RIDGEWOOD ST CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 5835 EISENMAN, TREVOR W. JR EISENMAN, MARIT S 504 N GLENWOOD AVE CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 5711 ACTON, KEVIN 1512 MAPLE ST CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 5727 BASSETT, WILLIAM L JR BASSETT, JEANNE E 615 N GLENWOOD AVE CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 5410 KRENTZMAN, JOHN A KRENTZMAN, MICHELE F 505 N GLENWOOD AVE CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 5712 MC MURTREY, THOMAS B JR MC MURTREY, MARY A 309 N GLENWOOD AVE CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 5708 BARANET, ELIZABETH 695 SNUG IS CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1830 ROSENHECK, ELEANORE L ROSENHECK, MARTIN 509 N HIGHLAND AVE CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 5718 SPARKS, RICHARD D 415 NORTH HIGHLAND AVE CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 5716 BARLA, GIORGIO 12676 RIDGE RD LARGO FL 33778 - 1812 WHITE, NANCY M 508 N GLENWOOD AVE CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 5711 WEIMER, LILLIAN 610 N GLENWOOD AVE CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 5409 TURNER, ALLIN M 609 N GLENWOOD AVE CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 5410 CIONI, ROBERT G CIONI, MARGIE L 411 N GLENWOOD AVE CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 5710 CLEARWATER, CITY OF 112 S OSCEOLA AVE CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5103 ESTRADA, CAROL 1500 MAPLE ST CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 5727 DORAN, VINCENT R JR DORAN, JOANNE B 505 N HIGHLAND AVE CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 5718 MORRISON, JOHN MORRISON, KARENA 409 N HIGHLAND AVE CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 5716 EISENMAN, CHRISTOPHER R 410 N GLENWOOD AVE CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 5709 WITZ, MITCHEL WITZ, MARTHA L 1515 MAPLE ST CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 5728 MASSARELLI, PETER T MASSARELLI, PATRICIA M 616 N GLENWOOD AVE CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 5409 REDALIA, DEBRA 509 N GLENWOOD AVE CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 5712 WARREN, JAMES R WARREN, CYNTHIA 403 N GLENWOOD AVE CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 5710 GARVEY, RITA J 1550 RIDGEWOOD ST CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 5748 MISSONIS, PAUL J JR MAGUIRE, GAIL ROSS, THURMAN J III MISSONIS, MARY H 1525 MAPLE ST 1529 MAPLE ST 1411 DRUID RD CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 5730 CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 5730 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 6127 r BIER, NELSON M ".4531 MAPLE ST CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 5730 SLEDD, DAVID SLEDD, NINA 1531 RIDGEWOOD ST CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 5747 FUGE, RALPH H FUGE, DOROTHY M 1525 PINEWOOD ST CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 5745 STUART, RODERICK B STUART, LINDA M 1539 RIDGEWOOD ST CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 5747 CLEARWATER, CITY OF P O BOX 4748 CLEARWATER FL 33758 - 4748 GAUDET, DAVID W GAUDET, MARY K 1530 RIDGEWOOD ST CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 5746 RACE, EDNA D ZINSZER, TONI K 1526 PINEWOOD ST CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 5744 MC CORMICK, BARBARA 2060 RIDGELANE RD CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 1264 FODERINGHAM, HEATHER H 1538 RIDGEWOOD ST CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 5746 GUIGNON, CLAIRE 1603 BONAIR ST CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3706 MARIER, MARY E 1532 RIDGEWOOD ST CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 5746 STUART, JEAN H 1532 PINEWOOD ST CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 5744 DOUGLASS, GREGG B DOUGLASS, LESLIE J 1539 PINEWOOD ST CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 5745 SIMIELE, ANTHONY J III SIMIELE, KRISTINE E 1533 MAPLE ST CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 5730 KAYE, REBECCA W KAYE, TERENCE D 1555 MAPLE ST CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 5731 LOEHWING, RUDI MINKOFF, DAVID I FLS2007 -04017 LOEHWING, CLAIRE MINKOFF, SUSAN S 1529 Maple Street 1560 RIDGEWOOD ST 404 EDGEWOOD AVE Steven Everitt CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 5748 CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 5705 CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARMNT POST OFFICE Box 4748 CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748 APR 18 2007 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER C�eau��Zw��h �� {� eon 300 Qo A �-e ovl(� OZ �l 33�SB I 0 -0 6 "U I O �) O PC• ' PG PC O ! 6 U 10 PG . I 6 "u!o i 6 "U l0 o..0 O pG o o� j O PG 1 6 "U i j 611U 012 "P ! o I 1 N ® 6. 'u SITE LOCATION MAP (2) 5TORY RE51I ?F- OE PG ! NOT TO SCALE PERSPECTIVE PERSPECTIVE VIEW #2 VIEW #1 ,9 CASWM. k,i*Y' i \ 10N1c= Too 152q CoLEAP4NATER, FLORIDA 20' V151BILITY TRIANGLE v� EXISTING 5 GONG. WALK ! 60 � A -1 G - CREPE MYRTLE E EXISTING ° POOL j o P - PALM PG - PALM CLUSTER U 0 6 "U I EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS NEW• ' 12 "P ; ! EX15T NG ATTACHED N .L PGO I STORAGE o �t U I I. I I I I I j V / V (10 -15F) II 811pO i I i II II C/� M • -641 II O i Q � • I PG i . I O 00 r- I I ! • 1 j 1 1 I 1 I I EXISTING PG i I 5PA ! I I 0 O i ' 9 "PIO 9 "P PG 1 I I j I . ; NEW AIR TOW ' I I REMOVED I O ! i I I ' -- —_ II —I I'i I�r-r ! T I T 14 "U ! ! I ! i up- I ! ------- e==- = - - -__ I O ! NOTE: THREE 16 "0 I CHINABERRY TREES TO BE REMOVED 12 "U _•._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._ .._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._. 8 U 016"U — — intu � I NUMBER DE5I6NATE5 DIAMETER RECEIVED MAY 2 9 2007 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER TREE FLAN 50ALE: 1/5" = 1' -0" NORTH LIST OF DRA1,,l""il,,iIN65 ARCHITECTURAL DRANIN65 A -1 G - CREPE MYRTLE E - PINE O - OAK P - PALM PG - PALM CLUSTER U - UNKNOWN NUMBER DE5I6NATE5 DIAMETER RECEIVED MAY 2 9 2007 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER TREE FLAN 50ALE: 1/5" = 1' -0" NORTH LIST OF DRA1,,l""il,,iIN65 ARCHITECTURAL DRANIN65 A -1 1/8" 51TE PLAN A -2 1/4" FLOOR PLANS A -3 1/4" POOLHOUSE PLANS & EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS A -4 1/4" EXTERIOR ELEVATION5 A -5 1/4" EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS ZONIN : LMDR SETBACKS: 25' FRONT 5ETBAGK 5' 51DE 5ETBACK5, 15' REAR SETBACK 1m T-IGmy yum1- t''tc.1=: TOTAL 51TE AREA - 5aUARE FEET (5.F.): • EXISTING BUILDING AREA (5.F.): • EXISTING DRIVEWAY (5.F.): • EXISTING FRONT WALKWAY (5.17.): • EXISTING POOL DECK/REAR WALK5 (5.F.): • EXISTING SHED (5.F.): • EXISTING TOTAL IMPERVIOU5 AREA (5.F.): EXISTING 15R 5,053 / g34q = • PROPO5E7 BUILDING AREA (5.F.): • PROP05ED DRIVEWAY (5.F.): • PROP05ED FRONT WALKWAY (5.F.): • PROP05ED POOL DECK /REAR WALK5 (S.F.): • PROP05ED POOL HOUSE (5.F.): • PROPOSED POOL HOUSE COVERED PATIO (5.F.): • PROP05ED TOTAL IMPERVIOU5 AREA (5.F.): PROP05ED 15R 5,74q / g34q = ALLOWABLE 15R =.65 Kt= I EXISTING — 36" HIGH WALL NEW 1 5 GONG. WALK ; 20' V151BILITY TRIANGLE NEW 5' GONG. WALK -- -------- - - - - -- --------- - - - - -- -------------------------------------- EXISTING = / r- EXISTING 5' GONG. ---------------------- WALK Q 36" HIGH TO BE REMOVED WALL 1. I I I I �aoo� -c�a 17 EXISTING 5' GONG. WALK I I / EXISTING PAVER 1 � 1 , DRIVEWAY ; ; EXISTING ° ! 5TAIR5 1 1 11' -11 1/2" FROM GRADE TO MIDPOINT 111 ; 1 1 NEW GARAGE ; ' 1 1 :- 1,1 (501 5F) ` - -� -- - - - - -� - EXISTING PAVERS a. ' ----- - - - - 1 14' -4 3/4" OF NEW GARAGE ROOF M 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 M 1 I i' ' I I I t\ � • L _ NEW• .L I +,S I I I o �t U I I. I I I I I V / V (10 -15F) II 1- i II II C/� M • -641 II I I I I I , 2,211 3q5 685 1,6-16 56 5,053 .54 2,51q 1q6 (010 1,668, 253 203 5,'14q .61 1 ° I EXISTING UP (2) 5'rORY RESIDENCE I , I 1 � - --------- - - -- - -- - - - - -- - - - - -- � I \ ♦ /' I I h II Ed I I III �'1 I I I I I - - - -I- - J L - - - - - - - - - -- -- :: I I EXI5TING ATTACHED ! STORAGE I i I I I II I I 1 1 14' -4 3/4" M I 5' SIDE SETBACK 1 I M 1 I i' ' I I I t\ � e , NEW• r1W o �t U I o N Nt V (10 -15F) 1 1- H o C/� M ® o o I I I I I Q � • O 1 � O 00 r- • 1 j 1 1 I 1 I 1 I ' I I I 1 I I I I . ; ' -- —_ II —I I'i I�r-r ! T I T I w — — intu pw t._.._.._.._.._....._.._.._ ._.._.._. ._.._.._..--- ••...... ...... ...... SITE PLAN SCALE: 1/8" = 1' -O" Iv YWlvlviivl�i uctr�l(IiVICIV! CITY AF CLEARWATER z ' o ! N ! NEW 36" HIGH PRIVACY WALL I EXISTING ! FENCE I I I I 1 I i 1 I ! I I ! ! I ! I ! I EXISTING I j POOL I I • I I ! I I 1 EXISTING 1 5PA I I ' S1DE SETBACK I I i I I 1 I I NEW POOL HOUSE ! COVERED PATIO I j (253 5F) ❑" 1 1 I I I NEW POOL HOUSE I -(253 5F) 1 I I 1 I 1 i 1 I I I I I sl to ..- .............. J EXISTING SHED TO BE REMOVED L- 12' -6" FROM GRADE TO MIDPOINT OF NEW GARAGE ROOF NORTH REV. 5 -2q -0'7 4 -2 -0-7 U AA C 000813 J ©200-7 0 1� a 12 1 �•ah Q�` � 1. 1 M �p M 1 e a t\ � e , L r1W o �t U N � N Nt V W W 1 N H o C/� M ® o o W Q � O 1 � O 00 r- 1 �•ah Q�` � 1. 1