The URL can be used to link to this page

FLS2007-04018 (2)BLS Z07- o'i o T8 ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT REPORT OF RECOGNIZED ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS AND HAZARDOUS BUILDING MATERIALS WAL *MART — Clearwater (Highland) STORE #4667 -00 1815 Highland Avenue, Clearwater, Florida Tenant Spaces 1, 2, and 5 Prepared for: WAL *MART STORES; INC. Prepared by: MACTEC ENGINEERING. AND CONSULTING, INC. 4.919 West aurel Street Tampa, Florida 33607 �R1GBy�, MACTEC Project 6515-05 - 0452.01' MAY 252007 November 27, 2005 Mr. David Walthall Kimley -Horn and Associates, Inc. 10117 Princess Palm Avenue, Suite 300 Tampa, Florida 33610 -8302 Ph: 813 -620 -1460 Fx: 813- 620 -1542 E -mail: David .Waltballna.Kimley- horn.com Subject: Environmental Site Assessment Report of Recognized Environmental Conditions and Hazardous Building Materials Wal *Mart — Clearwater (Highland). Store #4667 -00 1815 Highland Avenue, Clearwater, Florida Tenant Spaces 1, 2 and 5 MACTEC Project 6515 -05- 0452.01 Via e -mail & I' Class Mail Dear Mr. WalthalI: MACTEC Engineering and Consulting, Inc. (MACTEC) has completed the Environmental Site Assessment Report of Recognized Environmental Conditions and Hazardous Building Materials, which includes the Recognized Environmental Conditions (REC) and Hazardous Building Materials (HBM) survey, due to the presence of building structures on the site referred to above, as outlined in the Wal *Mart Supplement to Phase I Guidelines - When Buildings Are Present (Revised 5/22/00). These services were provided in general accordance with MACTEC Proposal PROP06TMPA -285, dated October 18, 2006. This report, consisting of the narrative and supporting appendices, tables, and figures, must be utilized in its entirety. We appreciate the opportunity to be of service to you and look forward to our continued association. If you have any questions concerning this report, please contact us at your convenience. Sincerely, MACTEC ENGINEERING AND CONSULTING, INC. Asbestos Business License No. ZA0000116 o jJ Carol L. Thoma Sr. Safety & IH Specialist ORIGIM MAY 2 5 2007 PLA IN DEPARTMEN �LEARWATER ussell E. to er, P.E. Florida Asbestos Consultant License No. EA -000016 P. IENYJROl2006lProjectsl6515 -06 -0452 Highland Sq 1,2 5 SurveyTeporttACMREC- HBMReport.doc Distribution: Addressee (6) File (1) MACTEC Engineering and Consulting, Inc. 4919 West laurel Street a Tampa, FL 33607 • Phone: 813.289.0750 • Fax: 813.289.5474 www.mactec.com Wal *Mart - Clearwater (Highland), Store #4667 -00, Clearwater, Florida November 27, 2005 1815 Highland Avenue, Clearwater, Florida Environmental Site Assessment Report of MACTECProject 6515 -05 -0452.01 Recognized Environmental Conditions and Hazardous Building Materials TABLE OF CONTENTS Page LISTOF TABLES .................................................................................»........ ............................... iv , LIST OF FIGURES ......................................................................................... ............................... iv 1.0 SCOPE OF SERVICES ........................................................................ ..............................1 2.0 SITE DESCRIPTION ........................................................................... ..............................2 3.0 SURVEY PROCEDURES .................................................................... ..............................3 3.1 STRUCTURES ......................................................................... ............................... 3 3.2 PCBS ......................................................................................... ............................... 3 3.3 MERCURY ............................................................................... ............................... 4 3.4 CFCs ......................................................................................... ............................... 4 3.5 PRE - DEMOLI'T'ION ASBESTOS INSPECTION ..................... ............................... 5 3.6 FLOOR DRAINS ..................... ................ 6 3.7 LBP ........................................................................................... ............................... 7 3.8 HAZARDOUS AND REGULATED MATERIALS USE AND STORAGE........... 8 4.0 RESULTS .............................................................................................. .......................... »...9 4.1 STRUCTURES ......................................................................... ............................... 9 4.2 PCBS ......................................................................................... ............... ...............10 4.3 MERCURY ............................................................................... .............................11 4.4 CFCs ......................................................................................... .............................11 4.5 PRE - DEMOLITION ASBESTOS INSPECTION ................... ............................... 12 4.5.1 Friable ACM ...........................................................--- .------ ......--------- ....... -- 13 4.5.2 Category I Non - Friable ACM ...................................... .............................13 4.5.3 Category II Non - Friable ACM ..................................... .............................14 4.5.4 Materials Containing <1% Asbestos .............................. ...........................1.,4 4.6 FLOOR DRAINS .................................................................... ............................... i5 4.7 LBP ........................................................................................... ...:.........................15 4.8 HAZARDOUS AND REGULATED MATERIALS USE AND STORAGE ......... 16 5.0 RECOMMENDATIONS ..................................................................... .............................17 5.1 STRUCTURES ......................................................................... .............................17 5.2 PCBs .............................................. ...........:._._....... ..................... ........................ ..... 17 5.3 MERCURY ............................................................................... .............................17 5.4 CFCs ......................................................................................... .............................18 5.5 PRE- DEMOLITION ASBESTOS INSPECTION ..................... .............................18 5.6 FLOORDRAINS .................................................................... .................. ............. 19 5.7 LBP ........................................................................................... .............................19 5.8 HAZARDOUS AND REGULATED MATERIALS USE AND STORAGE......... 19 6.0 QUALIFICATIONS ............................................................................. .............................21 11 :. __.. _.. Wal *Mart — Clearwater (Highland), Store 94667 -00, Clearwater, Florida November 27, 2005 1815 Highland Avenue, Clearwater, Florida Environmental Site Assessment Report of MACTEC Project 6515 -05- 0452.01 Recognized Environmental Conditions and Hazardous Building Materials TABLE OF CONTENTS - Continued APPENDIX A: SAMPLE LIST OF SUSPECT ASBESTOS - CONTAINING MATERIALS APPENDIX B: PLM REPORT SUMMARIES APPENDIX C: LICENSES AND CERTIFICATIONS ORIGIN& RECEIVED MAY 2 5 2007 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER hi 1 Hazardous Materials inventory 2 Pre - Demolition Asbestos Inspection Inventory 3 Lead -Based Paint Testing Results Figure I Site Plan 2 - 5 Asbestos Sample Locations LIST OF FIGURES IV Wal kMart — Clearwater (Highland), Store #4667 -00, Clearwater, Florida November 27, 2005 1815 Highland Avenue, Clearwater, Florida Environmental Site Assessment Report of MACTECProject 651 5 -05- 0452.01 Recognized Environmental Conditions and Hazardous Building Materials 1.0 SCOPE OF SERVICES Based upon the information provided, the following is our understanding of Wal *Mart's requirements for this project, Deviations from the Wal *Mart standard are noted in bold. The subject site contains existing structures. As such, Wal -Mart has additional service expectations related to Recognized Environmental Conditions (REC), Hazardous Building Materials (HBM), and "other potential liabilities" which may be present on the site. The services MACTEC provided generally conform with Wal -Mart's Supplement to Phase I Guidelines -When Buildings Are Present (Revised 5/22/00), herein referred to as the Supplement, and include: • VisuaI inspection of the building's interior and exterior structural features; • Identification of polychlorinated biphenyls (PCB) - containing equipment (sampling was conducted only if warranted and only with prior approval from Kimley -Horn and Associates, Inc. (Kimley- Hom)); • Identification of mercury- containing equipment; • Identification of chlorofluorocarbons (CFC)- containing equipment; • Visual identification of above and underground storage tanks (this effort was assumed to be performed in conjunction with an existing Phase I activities — not included); • Notation of the presence and discharge point of floor drains (sampling was conducted only if warranted and only with prior approval from Kimley -Horn); • Identification and sampling of asbestos containing material (ACM); • Testing of potable water sources for lead content (not included); • Surveying for the presence of lead -based paint (LBP) — sampling via XRF only; • Notation of regulated and hazardous materials use and storage (sampling was conducted only if warranted and only with prior approval from Kimley - Horn); and • Report preparation - included. 1 Wal *Mart — Clearwater (Highland), Store #4667 -00, Clearwater, Florida November 27, 2005 1815HighlandAvenue, Clearwater, Florida Environmental Site Assessment Report of MACTEC Project 6515 -05- 0452.01 Recognized Environmental Conditions and Hazardous Building Materials 2.0 SITE DESCRIPTION The project site is located at 1815 Highland Avenue North, Clearwater, Pinellas County, Florida, Tenant Spaces 1, 2 and 5. The site primarily consists of a strip center. We understand that three existing tenant spaces are planned for demolition to provide space for the new Wal -Mart store. The existing tenant spaces at the site include the following: Tenant Space 1: Former Winn Dixie • Tenant Space 2: Former Bingo Hall • Tenant Space 5: Former Church Wal *Mart — Clearwater (Highland), Store #4667 -00, Clearwater, Florida November 27, 2005 1815 Highland Avenue, Clearwater, Florida Environmental Site Assessment Report of AM CTEC Project 6515 -05- 0452.01 Recognized Environmental Conditions and Hazardous Building Materials 3.0 SURVEY PROCEDURES The following sections include our identification and quantification processes of REC and HBM. Other potential liabilities were not identified at the site. These services were performed on November 8 through 10 and 13, 2006. 3.1 STRUCTURES The following building features were noted and reported, if available: • Construction date, • Approximate square footage, • Type of heating system and public utilities, • Past and present uses, • The presence of basements or crawl spaces, • The presence and discharge points of floor drains. 3.2 PCBS PCBs are a mixture of chemicals used in a wide variety of components which do not breakdown in the environment and may accumulate in the food chain. In 1979, the Toxic Substance Control Act (TSCA) banned the manufacture of PCBs. Since PCB - containing fluorescent lighting fixtures were allowed by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to remain in use and since these types of fixtures can have an expected usage life of 30 or more years, PCBs are still present today. Requirements for disposition of these items include identification, transport to a processor for removal of the PCB components, and disposal at approved facilities by the EPA. Recycling of light ballasts, common PCB - containing components, is recommended by the State for their disposition. MACTEC performed a site reconnaissance to visually identify and record the presence,, location, and condition of suspect PCB - containing equipment such as fluorescent light ballasts and electrical transformers, where reasonably accessible. Any obvious signs of leakage were documented. The 3 Wal *Mart = Clearwater (Highland), Store #4667 -00, Clearwater, Florida November 27, 2005 1815 Highland Avenue, Clearwater, Florida Environmental Site Assessment Report of MACTEC Project 6515 -05- 0452.01 Recognized Environmental Conditions and Hazardous Building Materials documented. The equipment was not visually inspected for external labels indicating PCB - content and serial numbers. No attempts were made to disassemble the units to check for internal leakage. The reconnaissance was limited to those areas that were accessible without danger to human safety or environmental well- being. For equipment not readily identifiable as containing PCBs, no further investigation or record searching was performed at the time to determine its presence or absence. In addition, sampling of media that were potentially impacted by PCBs, or reservoirs, was not performed. 33 MERCURY Mercury is a toxic metal that, in certain forms, can accumulate in living tissue and cause adverse health effects. Florida Administrative Code (FAC) Chapter 62 -737 outlines the regulations for the proper handling, recycling, and management of such items. The State recommends recycling as the management option for the disposition of fluorescent lamps, which are common mercury - containing components. MACTEC performed a site reconnaissance to visually identify and record the presence, location, and general condition of suspect mercury vapor - containing equipment such as fluorescent, mercury vapor, high intensity discharge (HDD), and other lamps, as well as liquid mercury- containing equipment such as thermostats, and other temperature control and Heating, Ventilation, and Air Conditioning (HVAC) devices, where reasonably accessible. Any obvious signs of leakage were documented. No attempts were made to disassemble the units to check for internal leakage. The reconnaissance was limited to those areas that were accessible without danger to human safety or environmental well being. 3.4 CFCs The EPA is responsible for several programs that protect the stratosphere ozone layer, under Title VI of the CIean Air Act (CAA). The EPA regulations promulgated to protect the ozone layer are in 40 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 82.. Generally stated, stationary air - conditioning and refrigeration appliances are regulated under Section 608, and motor vehicle air - conditioning 4 .. Wal *Mart — Clearwater (Highland), Store #4667 -00, Clearwater, Florida November 27, 2005 1815 Highland Avenue, Clearwater, Florida Environmental Site Assessment Report of MACTEC Project 6515 -05- 0452.01 Recognized Environmental Conditions and Hazardous Building Materials systems are regulated under Section 609. While Florida does not have the statutory authority to administer stationary air - conditioning and refrigeration programs, it does have the authority to administer a motor vehicle air conditioning program. Among the recommended methods for the disposition of CFCs are recycling and reclamation. MACTEC performed a site reconnaissance to visually identify and record the presence, location, and general condition of suspect CFC- containing equipment, such as refrigerators and air conditioning units. Any obvious signs of leakage were documented. The equipment was not visually inspected for external labels indicating CFC content and serial numbers. No attempts were made to disassemble the units to check for internal leakage. These efforts were limited to those areas that were accessible without danger to human safety or environmental well- being. For equipment not readily identifiable as containing CFCs, no further investigation or record searching was performed at the time to determine the presence or absence. 3.5 PRE - DEMOLITION ASBESTOS INSPECTION The National Emissions Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) Final Rule Revision (EPA 40 CFR, Part 61) dated November 20, 1990, includes several items addressing asbestos removal and disposal. One key element is the categorization of ACM. These are categorized as follows: • Friable ACM includes any material that can be reduced to powder by hand pressure when dry; • Category I Non- Friable ACM includes packing, gaskets, resilient floor coverings, and roofing products that contain more than one percent asbestos; e . Category 11 Non - Friable ACM includes any material, excluding Category I Non - Friable ACM, that contains more than one percent asbestos, and is not friable; Regulated ACM (RACM) includes all friable ACM and Category I Non - Friable ACM that will be or has been subject to sanding, grinding, cutting, or abrading, Category 11 Non - Friable ACM that has become friable, and Category II Non - Friable ACM that has a high probability of becoming, or has become crumbled, pulverized, or reduced to a powder by forces expected to act on the material in the course of demolition or renovation operations. Wal 'Mart — Clearwater (Highland), Store #4667 -00, Clearwater, Florida November 27, 2005 1815 Highland Avenue, Clearwater, Florida Environmental Site Assessment Report of MACTEC Project 6515 -05- 0452.01 Recognized Environmental Conditions and Hazardous Building Materials The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) asbestos regulations incorporate a category of suspect ACM (those which may contain asbestos) in which the likelihood of containing asbestos is so great that they are presumed . to contain asbestos; these materials are known as Presumed Asbestos - Containing Materials (PACM). Generally stated, these are friable or flooring materials installed in facilities prior to 1981. Sampling would typically be required to determine that any noted PACM does not contain asbestos. Alternatively, OSHA requires that any noted PACM be handled as though they do contain asbestos until documented otherwise. The pre - demolition asbestos inspection was performed by an Asbestos Inspector, accredited under the EPA Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA), and the work was directed by Mr. Russell E. Stauffer, State of Florida Licensed Asbestos Consultant No. EA- 0000016. As requested, the survey was performed to .generally satisfy the pre- demolition/renovation asbestos inspection requirements in the Supplement and included limited destructive sample testing. MACTEC services conducted included: (1) a review of provided previous reports, building specifications, and blueprints (if available), (2) a walk-through of the facilities, (3) sampling of suspect ACM, (4) testing for asbestos content of suspect ACM samples by Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM), (5) identification of ACM, including its location, condition, quantity, and NESHAP category, and (6) providing recommendations in general accordance with the Supplement. 3.6 FLOOR DRAINS MACTEC performed a site reconnaissance to visually identify and record the presence of any floor drains, grease traps, and oil/water separators associated with the building with an attempt to determine associated discharge points. Sampling of material within the drainage structure was not performed. 6 Wal *Mart — Clearwater (Highland), Store #4667 -00, Clearwater, Florida November 27, 2005 1815 Highland Avenue, Clearwater, Florida Environmental Site Assessment Report of MACTECProjeci 6515 -05- 0452.01 Recognized Environmental Conditions and Hazardous Building Materials 3.7 LBP The purpose of the LBP survey was to identify and record the presence of LBP by testing the paint /coatings on various interior and exterior surfaces of the building. The location and condition of building surfaces tested was also documented. The testing included a walk- through of accessible areas of the building. • The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) has defined LBP as coatings where the concentration of lead is equal to or exceeds either of 1.0 milligrams of lead per square centimeter of surface area (1.0 mg/cm2), when tested by X -Ray Fluorescence (XRF), or as coatings in which the concentration of lead is equal to or greater than 0.5 percent by weight, which is equal to 5,000 milligrams of lead per kilogram of sample ( mg/kg), or alternately stated as 5,000 parts per million (ppm), when analyzed by laboratory methods. • EPA has defined LBP as coatings where the concentration of lead is equal to or exceeds either of 1.0 mgICM2, when tested by XRF, or as coatings in which the concentration of lead is equal to or greater than 0.5 percent by weight, which is equal to 5,000 mg/kg or 5,000 ppm when analyzed by laboratory methods. • In 1998, the Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) banned coatings for non - industrial applications where the concentration of lead is equal to or exceeds 600 ppm or 0.06 percent by weight in the dry film. • OSHA does not have a definition of LBP. Instead, OSHA addresses lead that can become airborne if coatings containing any concentrations of lead are disturbed during construction activities. The surfaces were tested for LBP using selected portions of the inspection protocol of Chapter 7 of HUD's Guidelines for the Evaluation and Control of Lead Based Paint Hazards in Housing, (1997 revision), to document whether lead -based coatings were present. EPA- trained LBP Inspectors/Risk Assessors performed the testing. The results, to assist in compliance with requirements of the OSHA, are reported in a format that documents which surfaces are covered with lead -based coatings. MACTEC utilized an XRF Spectrum Analyzer to document the concentration of lead in paint for each testing combination. A testing combination for the OSHA focus of the testing was defined as a unique combination of coating color, component type, and substrate type. The selection of the test 7 Wal *Mart — Clearwater (Highland), Store #4667 -00, Clearwater, Florida November 27, 2005 1815 Highland Avenue, Clearwater, Florida Environmental Site Assessment Report of MACTEC Project 6515 -05- 0452.01 Recognized Environmental Conditions and Hazardous Building Materials test location for a specific testing combination was representative of the paint over the areas that were most likely to be coated with suspect lead -based coatings. In accordance with OSHA directives, the lead content of "negative" (less than 1.0 mg/cm2) XRF results was extrapolated from the XRF readings into an analogous ppm value. Zero and "tme- negative" readings (i.e., -0.2) are noted as below the detection limit of the instrument. 3.8 HAZARDOUS AND REGULATED MATERIALS USE AND STORAGE Hazardous wastes are wastes listed in 40 CFR 261, Subpart D, as hazardous by the EPA, or they are wastes characterized in 40 CFR 261, Subpart C as hazardous by exhibiting 1 of 4 characteristics: ignitability, corrosivity, reactivity, or toxicity. If a material is hazardous, then it must be recycled, treated, stored, or disposed at a proper hazardous waste facility. Florida regulations dealing with hazardous waste are included in Chapter 62 -730, FAC. Hazardous wastes are not to be disposed of in Florida. MACTEC performed a site reconnaissance to identify potentially hazardous and regulated materials within the property boundary. The presence, location, and condition of containers storing regulated or hazardous materials were documented. Containers were inspected for labels identifying contents. Due to the absence of any facility managers at the facility, Material Safety Data Sheets (MSDS) were not requested for any materials stored and used on -site. Each container and underlying substrate was visually inspected for signs of leaks. The presence and discharge points of any floor drains located in the vicinity of any regulated or hazardous materials storage and use were noted. If improper storage and use of a regulated or hazardous material was identified, MACTEC recommended appropriate action. If leaky containers or containers in poor condition were identified, appropriate documentation was completed and recommendations for off-site disposal were made. Sampling of unidentified containers, potentially impacted areas, or drainage systems was not performed. 0 Wal *Mart — Clearwater (Highland), Store #4667 -00, Clearwater, Florida November 17, 2005 1815 Highland Avenue, Clearwater, Florida Environmental Site Assessment Report of MACTEC Project 6515 -05- 0452.01 Recognized Environmental Conditions and Hazardous Building Materials 4.0 RESULTS The following sections describe the results obtained during our identification of REC and HBM. 4.1 STRUCTURES Based on information obtained from the site visit and/or the Pinellas County Property Appraiser's research data, facility information is shown below: _......nant_ .ace 1.... Fozm�rrnn I3t�ete ::. 9,447 Construction Date 1970's Approx. Square Footage 30,870 Stories One HVAC System Central Units Utilities Electric, Water Present Use Vacant Past Use Grocery Store Basement/Crawl S ace No Floor Drains 16 Roof Type 1 Built Up Roof Construction Date 1970's Approx. Square Footage 9,447 Stories One HVAC System Central Units Utilities Electric, Water Present Use Vacant Past Use Bingo Hall Basement/Crawl Space No Floor Drains None Roof Type Built !Jp Roof 9 Wal *Mart — Clearwater (Highland), Store #4667 -00, Clearwater, Florida November 27, 2005 1815 Highland Avenue, Clearwater, Florida Environmental Site Assessment Report of MACTECProject 6515 -05- 0452.01 Recognized Environmental Conditions and Hazardous Building Materials -• ___---- -• �- ...: .,..:.- ••- COIIltit_�Ili`�:..,•:: -::. _�_ .:..........:.__: � r==i Construction Date 1970's Approx. Square Footage 13,320 Stories One HVAC System Central Units Utilities Electric, Water Present Use Vacant Past Use Church Basement /Crawl Space No Floor Drains None RoofType Built Yp Roof 4.2 PCBS MACTEC performed a site reconnaissance to document the presence, location, and condition of potential PCB- containing components located on the proposed site and within the structures described in Section 4.1. Table 1 outlines potential PCB - containing components identified during MACTEC's inspection which may pose a potential liability. These included the following: Tenant Space 1 + 350, eight foot ballasts + .45, four foot ballasts + 1 transformer Tenant Space 2 + 181, eight foot ballasts Tenant Space 5 + 75, eight foot ballasts All components identified as potentially containing PCBs appeared to have no staining or other evidence of leaks, and generally speaking, these components appeared to be in good condition. This evaluation was based upon our observation of the exterior of the components only. 10 Wal *Mart — Clearwater (Highland), Store #4667 -00, Clearwater, Florida November 27, 2005 1815 Highland Avenue, Clearwater, Florida Environmental Site Assessment Report of MACTEC Project 6515 -05- 0452.01 Recognized Environmental Conditions and Hazardous Building Materials 4.3 MERCURY MACTEC performed a site reconnaissance to document the presence, Iocation, and condition of potential mercury- containing components located on the proposed site and within the structures described in Section 4.1. Table 1 outlines potential mercury - containing components identified during MACTEC's inspection which may pose a potential liability. These included our count of the following: Tenant Space I • 924, eight -foot fluorescent bulbs 0 90, four -foot fluorescent bulbs 12 thermostats • 6 exterior mercury/sodium vapor lamps Tenant Space 2 • 543, eight -foot fluorescent bulbs • 2 thermostats Tenant Space 5 • 256, eight -foot fluorescent bulbs • 4 thermostats within tenant space The fluorescent bulbs, mercury/sodium vapor lamps, and thermostats appeared to be in good condition. During our site reconnaissance, none of the components identified as potentially containing mercury indicated that a leak had occurred. This evaluation was based upon our observation of the exterior of the components only. 4.4 CFCS .MACTEC performed a site reconnaissance to determine the presence, location, and condition of potential CFC- containing components located on the proposed site and within the structures described in Section 4.1. Table I outlines potential CFC - containing components identified during MACTEC's inspection which may pose a potential liability. These included the following: 11 Wal 'Mart — Clearwater (Highland), Store #4667 -00, Clearwater, Florida November 27, 2005 1815 Highland Avenue, Clearwater, Florida Environmental Site Assessment Report of MACTEC Project 6515 -05- 0452.01 Recognized Environmental Conditions and Hazardous Building Materials Tenant Space 1 • 26, six -foot meat coolers • 8, three -foot meat coolers • 13, five and one -half -foot vegetable coolers • 32, three -foot vegetable cooler • 12, six -foot freezers • 48, three -foot freezers • 3, three -foot deli coolers • 2, four -foot deli coolers • 8 walk -in cooler /freezers • 1 water fountain • 12 HVAC systems • 14 four -foot cylinders of refrigerant Tenant Space 2 • 2 water fountains • . 2 HVAC systems Tenant Space 5 - • 1 water fountain • 4 HVAC systems During our site reconnaissance, none of the components identified as potentially containing CFCs indicated that a leak had occurred. Generally speaking, the components appeared to be in good condition. This evaluation was based upon our observation of the exterior of the components only. 4.5 PRE- DEMOLITION ASBESTOS INSPECTION MACTEC completed a pre- demolition asbestos inspection of the three designated structures Iocated on site. Previous reports, building specifications, or blue prints were not made available, so a records review was not accomplished. Included as Appendix A is a Sample List of Suspect ACM that is used as a guide to identify those items that may contain asbestos. 12 Wal *Mart — Clearwater (Highland), Store #4667 -00, Clearwater, Florida November 27, 2005 1815 Highland Avenue, Clearwater, Florida Environmental Site Assessment Report of MACTEC Project 6515 -05 -0452.01 Recognized Environmental Conditions and Hazardous Building Materials During our inspection, a total of 189 samples of suspect ACM were obtained, as outlined in the following table: =...:::-::, :c. :.::::..:.:..- .......,_..._. ,..._..._..___. ._ .__x.- .._._. .� ._.. �.,., .:- .::er.;,�.-- . *•::a::o::....- ems:.:- :...,_...._..- -- _..__..�.._.._... 107 Tenant Space 1 40 Tenant Space 2 42 Tenant Space 5 Results of the identified ACM/PACM are summarized as follows: 4.5.1 Friable ACM Tenant Space 1: • None Tenant Space 2: • None Tenant Space 5: • None 4.5.2 Category I Non- Friable ACM Tenant Space 1: • Floor Tile and Mastic • Black Mastic under Leveling Compound • Roofing Mastic Tenant Space 2: • Floor Tile and Mastic • Wall Panel Gray Mastic • Mirror Mastic • Roofing Mastic Tenant Space 5: • Floor Tile and Mastic • Roofing Mastic 13 Wal *Mart — Clearwater (Highland), Store #4667 -00, Clearwater, Florida November 27, 2005 1815 Highland Avenue, Clearwater, Florida Environmental Site Assessment Report of MACTEC Project 6515 -05 - 0452.01 Recognized Environmental Conditions and Hazardous Building Materials 4.53 Category II Non - Friable ACM Tennant Space 1: • Paint Texture • Drywall Joint Compound Tenant Space 2: • None Tenant Space 5: • None 4.5.4 Materials Containing <1% Asbestos Tennant Space 1: • None Tennant Space 2: • Paint Texture • Joint Compound • Ceramic Tile White Adhesive Tennant Space 5: • Joint Compound • Ceramic Tile White Adhesive The HVAC Duct insulation within Tenant Spaces 2 and 5 were constructed of non- suspect building materials and therefore, not sampled. Areas that were not accessible during the survey included interior of fire doors within Tenant Spaces 1, 2 and 5. The identified ACM was observed to be in.fair to good condition at the time of the survey. Table 2 details the summary of the ACM analysis for each tenant space, and Figure 2 depicts the asbestos sample locations. Laboratory analytical results are included in Appendix B of this report. I4 Wal *Mart —Clearwater (Highland), Store #4667.00, Clearwater, Florida November 27, 2005 1815 Highland Avenue, Clearwater, Florida Environmental Site Assessment Report of AM CTEC Project 6515 -05- 0452.01 Recognized Environmental Conditions and Hazardous Building Materials Various other, typically non- suspect materials (i.e., concrete, block, rubber products, etc.) were noted in the structures but were not sampled. 4.6 FLOOR DRAINS MACTEC identified 16 floor drains within Tenant Space 1 during the site reconnaissance. 4.7 LBP During the LBP survey, MACTEC identified the presence, location, and condition of LBP on the building's surfaces. The XRF testing results are as follows: Tenant Space 1 (46 tests) • 1 combinations were above the HUD /EPA 5,000 ppm definition • 15 combinations contained lead above the instrument detection limit but below the HUD/EPA 5,000 ppm definition • 30 combinations were below the detection limit of the instrument Tenant Space 2 (44 tests) 0 0 combinations were above the HUD /EPA 5,000 ppm definition • 9 combinations contained lead above the instrument detection limit but below the HUD /EPA 5,000 ppm definition • 35 combination were below the detection limit of the instrument Tenant Space 5 (55 tests) 0 0 combinations were above the HUD/EPA 5,000 ppm definition • 19 combinations contained lead above the instrument detection limit but below The HUD /EPA 5,000 ppm definition 0 36 combination were below the detection limit of the instrument The testing results. obtained during the survey are included in Table 3. The painted surfaces tested on the interior and exterior of the buildings appeared to be in good to fair condition. 15 Wal *Mart — Clearwater (Highland), Store #4667 -00, Clearwater, Florida November 27, 2005 1815 Highland Avenue, Clearwater, Florida Environmental Site Assessment Report of AMCTECProject 6515 -05- 0452.01 Recognized Environmental Conditions and Hazardous Building Materials .. ..4.8 HAZARDOUS AND REGULATED MATERIALS USE AND STORAGE .: MACTEC completed a reconnaissance to identify and record the presence, location, and condition of hazardous or regulated materials located on the property. Table l .lists those items found within the buildings which may present a concern. Typical items identified included electrical outlets, electrical switches, electrical panels, security monitoring systems, and computer /register system. Other items include: neon sign letters, ovens, trash compactor, and water heaters. These items were generally in fair to good condition. Of note, none of the containers or items listed showed any sign of leakage. In addition, MACTEC personnel looked for floor drains in the vicinity of each item or container, but none were identified. Wal 'Mart — Clearwater (Highland), Store #4667 -00, Clearwater, Florida November 27, 2005 1815 Highland Avenue, Clearwater, Florida Environmental Site Assessment Report of MACTEC Project 6515 -05- 0452.01 Recognized Environmental Conditions and Hazardous Building Materials 5.0 RECOMMENDATIONS The following recommendations are made with regards to the on -site structures, with the assumption that demolition or extensive remodeling will be completed. 5.1 STRUCTURES If a structure possessing items containing RECs or HBMs (such as PCBs, mercury, CFCs, lead, etc.) is demolished or remodeled, MACTEC recommends that they be properly disposed either through recycling or landfill disposal depending upon the material being managed. It should be noted that under Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA), contractors who dispose of hazardous materials /waste may be subject to notification requirements, record keeping, and possibly future liability. Prior to disposal, the specific regulatory requirements and proper procedures for management should be evaluated regarding potentially hazardous materials that will be removed for disposal. 5.2 PCBS Items identified as containing PCBs (such as ballasts) must be disposed of at EPA approved facilities and, if not broken, should be recycled. If leaky ballasts require disposal, it should be placed in a heavy, plastic bag and disposed at an EPA- approved high temperature incinerator. MACTEC recommends either the recycling or removal of PCB - containing material as part of, or prior to, the demolition or remodeling of a structure. 53 MERCURY In accordance with Chapter 62 -737, FAC, MACTEC recommends either recycling or removing and properly disposing of mercury- containing material prior to the demolition or remodeling of the building. Items containing mercury cannot be incinerated or disposed of in a landfill. The best disposal option for mercury- containing components is recycling. 17 Wal 'Mart — Clearwater (Highland), Store #4667 -00, Clearwater, Florida November 27, 2005 1815 Highland Avenue, Clearwater, Florida Environmental Site'Assessment Report of MACTECProject 6515 -05- 0452.01 Recognized Environmental Conditions and Hazardous Building Materials 5.4 CFCS Prior to demolition efforts of structures housing CFC- containing equipment, special considerations need to be addressed. Items containing refrigerant, such as retail food refrigeration, central residential air conditioning, and chillers, etc., must have the refrigerant recovered in accordance with EPA's servicing and recycling requirements of Section 608 Refrigerant Recycling Rule of the CAA. However, items that typically enter the waste stream with the charge intact (e.g., motor vehicle air conditioners, household refrigerators and freezers, and room air conditioners) are subject to special safe disposal requirements. Based on the manner in which the equipment is to be managed, please follow CAA Section 608 and 40 CFR, Part 82, Subpart F, to ensure regulatory compliance. 5.5 PRE - DEMOLITION ASBESTOS INSPECTION We recommend that ACM be removed prior to any disturbance during repair, renovation or demolition that would dislodge or similarly break -up the material. If subjected to activities that would cause the materials to become RACM, they should be removed as such. Materials being removed must be done so in compliance with Chapter 469, Florida Statutes, typically by a. State Licensed Asbestos Abatement Contractor. Likewise, it is recommended that removals are conducted incorporating the delineation, control, and documentation of Technical Specifications/ Bidding Documents, which would include, per the Supplement, full -time, on -site project monitoring. Alternately, the Category I Non - Friable ACM may be left-in-place during a "wet demolition" with the prior approval of the local EPA/NESHAP regulator and following all appropriate handling and disposal requirements. Category R Non - Friable ACM is typically required to be removed prior to demolition activities that would cause the materials to become RACK OSHA has recently noted, in 7 recent interpretations, that materials containing less than 1% asbestos are subject to "...certain precautions...[that are] universal and apply to all work with asbestos, regardless of airborne exposures or asbestos content of previously installed materials. These requirements are to utilize wet methods, to the extent feasible...and to promptly clean up and 18 Wal 'Mart -- Clearwater (Highland), Store #4667 -00, Clearwater, Florida . November 27, 2005 1815 Highland Avenue, Clearwater, Florida Environmental Site Assessment ,Report of MACTEC Project 6515 -05- 0452.01 Recognized Environmental Conditions and Hazardous Building Materials and dispose in closed containers, waste and debris contaminated with asbestos... " (OSHA Standards Interpretation and Compliance Letter, July 7, 1998). OSHA has further required that workers involved with the demolition of materials containing less than 1 percent asbestos would also be required to have their work activities assessed to document that exposures above the Permissible Exposure Limit (PEL) did not occur (OSHA Standards Interpretation and Compliance Letter, August 13, 1999). 5.6 FLOOR DRAINS Sixteen floor drains was identified in the Tenant Space 1. 5.7 LBP The disturbance of lead - containing painted surfaces should be addressed in accordance with OSHA Construction Standard for Lead (29 CFR 1926.62). Based on the concentration of lead identified, any waste generated by operations that would disturb these materials should be considered - potentially hazardous with waste characterization (including Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure testing) performed by the field inspector prior to off -site waste shipment, to determine the proper disposal requirements. Waste should be considered hazardous if it contains leachable lead at concentrations greater than 5.0 mg/kg. 5.8 HAZARDOUS AND REGULATED MATERIALS USE AND STORAGE Hazardous waste must be managed and disposed of in accordance with 40 CFR 260 -268. All hazardous waste must be properly containerized to ensure delivery to a permitted treatment, storage, or disposal facility. Records to account for disposition of the wastes must be retained for three years. For the removal and disposal of those items /containers that were identified as potential liabilities, proper disposal should be conducted based on the waste stream. Batteries located on site cannot be disposed of in a landfill, and arrangements should be made with an appropri ate recycler or permitted disposal facility that accepts lead -acid and nickel - cadmium batteries. 19 r1 r Wal *Mart — Clearwater (Highland), Store #4667 -00, Clearwater, Florida November 27, 2005 1815 Highland Avenue, Clearwater, Florida Environmental Site Assessment Report of MACTECProject 6515 -05 - 0452.01 Recognized Environmental Conditions and Hazardous Building Materials For other identified wastes which may be considered household wastes, such as paint or a small quantity of solvents, there are local Hazardous Waste Collection Centers which are facilities intended to provide free collections of non - regulated hazardous waste from households and to provide short-term storage of potentially hazardous wastes. Typically, businesses are charged a fee for disposal of wastes at these types of facilities. 20 Wal *'Mart — Ctearwater (Highland), Store #4667 -00, Clearwater, Florida November 27, 2005 1815 Highland Avenue, Clearwater, Florida Environmental Site Assessment Report of MACTEC Project 6515 -05- 0452.01 Recognized Environmental Conditions and Hazardous Building Materials 6.0 QUALIFICATIONS MACTEC has endeavored to observe the existing conditions.at the designated areas of the facility using generally accepted procedures. Regardless of the thoroughness of a survey, there is always the possibility that some areas were overlooked, inaccessible, or different from. those at specific sample locations. Therefore, conditions at every location may not be as anticipated and as summarized in this report. In addition, renovation or demolition may uncover altered or differing conditions. We recommend that you notify MACTEC if any changed conditions are encountered so that we can assess the situation and its impact on our original recommendations. Included in Appendix C are the licenses and resumes of those individuals who performed the site evaluations. Our asbestos recommendations are based upon the guidelines presented in the EPA's publication Guidance for Controlling Asbestos- Containing Materials in Buildings (EPA 560/5 -85 -024). Any conditions discovered which deviate from the data contained in this report, such as the discovery of suspect materials not addressed in this report, should be presented to us for review and evaluation. A Sample List of Suspect Asbestos - Containing Materials is included in Appendix A. Due to the health hazards and legal ramifications involved in asbestos exposure in buildings, an interdisciplinary approach among the engineering, medical, and legal communities should be involved when determining an asbestos control program. There are notice obligations imposed on building owners with respect to building employees, occupants, vendors, and others required in the OSHA Asbestos Standards (29 CFR 1910.1001 and 29 CFR 1926.1101), and for public agencies, the EPA Worker Protection Rule (40 CFR 763, Subpart G). Our LBP recommendations are based upon compliance with the previously cited OSHA and EPA regulations, and the state of the current industry practices in regard to the handling, disturbance and disposal of construction materials containing lead. Likewise, our hazardous material assessments and recommendations have been developed in general accordance with the Recommended Management Practices for the Removal of Hazardous Materials from Buildings prior to Demolition, as developed by the University of Florida and the Florida Department of Protection (FDEP). 21 Wal *Mart — Clearwater (Highland), Store #4667 -00, Clearwater, Florida November 27, 2005 1815 Highland Avenue, Clearwater, Florida Environmental Site Assessment Report of MACTEC Project 6515 -05- 0452.01 Recognized Environmental Conditions and Hazardous Building Materials We recommend that you involve appropriate legal counsel in your asbestos, LBP, and hazardous materials program to address these very important issues. This report was not intended or developed to be substituted for project - specific bidding or contract documents. This report is intended for the exclusive use of Kimley -Horn and Wal *Mart Stores, Inc. Use of this report or reliance upon information contained in this report by any other party acts as an agreement by that party to the same terms and conditions under which our services were provided. Furthermore, any use of this report by a party for purposes beyond those intended by MACTEC, Kimley -Horn, and Wal *Mart Stores, Inc., will be at the sole risk of that party. TABLES Highland Square 1, 2, 5, Clearwater, Florida MACTEC Project 6515 -06 -0452 Table 1: Hazardous or Regulated Materials November 27, 2006 Hazardous Materials Building Survey ,t Store Location: Tenant Space I - Winn Dixie North Wall 6' Hi h Meat Cooler freon-cfc-copper 8 Good East Wall 6' Hi h Meat Cooler freon-cfe-copper 18 Good East Wall 3' Hi h Meat Cooler freon-cfe-copper 8 Good South Wall 5 1/2' Hi h Veggie Cooler freon-cfc-copper 6 Good West Wall 5 1/2' Hi h Ve ie Cooler freon-cfc-coEper 7 Good Veggie Floor 3' Hi h Veggie Coolers freon-cfc-copper 32 Good Center Main Floor 6' High Freezers freon - cfc - copper 12 Good Center Main Floor 3' High Freezers freon -cfc- copper 48 Good Deli Floor 3' Hi h Coolers freon-cfc-copper 4 Good Deli 4' Hi h Coolers freon-cfc-copper 2 Good Throughout Tenant Space Exit Signs copper 5 Good Neon Signs chemical vapor 6 Good Electrical Outlets /Swiches copper 250 Good Intercom System copper 1 Fair Security Monitoring System copper 1 Fair Telephone System copper 1 Fair Computer/Register System copper 8 Fair 8' Fluorescent Bulbs mercwy 924 Good 4' Fluorescent Bulbs mercury 90 Good 8' Ballast PCB 350 Good 4' Ballast PCB 45 Good HAVC System/Thermostats freon - cfc - copper /mercury 12 Fair Water Fountain freon-cfc-copper 1 Good Building Exterior Transformer PCB 1 Good Mercury/Sodium Vapor Lams chemical vapor 6 Good P:IENVIR0120061Prgiccts16515 -06 -0452 Highland Sq 1,2 5 SurveylRepoMREC -HMB Table.xls Page 1 of 4 Highland Square 1, 2, 5, Clearwater, Florida MACTEC Project 6515 -06 -0452 Table 1: Hazardous or Regulated Materials Store Location: Tenant Saace 1 November 27, 2006 Hazardous Materials Building Survey Deli Ovens copper 7 Good Floor Drains 10 Good Walk -in Coolers/Freezers freon-cfc-copper 2 Good Meat/Fish /Veggie ---Prep Area Walk -in Coolers/Freezers freon - cfc -co er 3 Good Floor Drains 6 Good Back Storage Refrigerant freon - chemicals 4'C hinder 14 Good Floor Drains 6 Good Trash Compactor copper-oil 1 Good Overhead Door copper-oil-hydraulic fluid 1 Good Walk -in Coolers/Freezers freon-cfo-copper 3 Good Mezzanine Hot Water Heaters copper 2 Good Electrical Panels copper 14 Good Freezer Compressors oil -PCB 6 Fair Battery lead - sulfuric acid 1 Fair Copper Piping copper 3000 LF Runs throughout store and roof/Good Checked by: CT P :Ir,NV /RO12OO6lProjectsl6515 -06 -0452 Highland Sq 1,2 5 SurveytReporMEC -HMB Table.xls Page 2 of 4 Highland Square 1, 2, 5, Clearwater, Florida MACTEC Project 6515 -06 -0452 Table 1: Hazardous or Regulated Materials Store Location: Tenant Space 2 - Bin¢o Hall November 27, 2006 Hazardous Materials Building Survey Throughout 8' Fluorescent Bulbs mercury 543 Good 8' Ballast PCB 181 Good Electrical Outlet/Switches copper 45 Good Electrical Boxes copper 4 Good Exit Sin co er 2 Good Drinking Fountains freon-cfc-copper 2 Fair Telephone/Cable Outlet copper 1 Fair Air Filter System copper 3 Air Filter Boxes Good HVAC - Thermostat freon-efc-copper/mercury 2 Good Computer Lines copper 1 Fair Emergency Light copper 2 Good Snack Bar Hot Water Heater copper 1 Good Soda Machine co er 1 Fair Checked by: (=r P:IENVIR0120064Projecisl6515 -06 -0451 Highland Sq 1,2 5 SurveylReportlREC -HMB Table.xls Highland Square 1, 2, S, Clearwater, Florida MACTEC Project 6515 -06 -0452 Table 1: Hazardous or Regulated Materials November 27, 2006 Hazardous Materials Building Survey Store Location: Tenant Space 5 - Church Mezzanine 8' Fluorescent Bulbs mercury 30 Good Hot Water Heater copper 1 Good Storage Room Paint chemicals 1 Gallon 27 Fair Paint chemicals 5- Gallon i Fair Paint chemicals Quarts 8 Fair Throughout Drinking Fountain freon - cfc -co er 1 Fair 8' Fluorescent Bulbs mercury 226 Good 8' Ballast PCB 75 Good Exit Signs copper 3 Good Electrical Boxes copper 3 Good Electrical Outlet/Switches cc er 30 Good HVAC - Thermostat freon-cfc-copper/mercury 4 Good Emergency Light co er 4 Good Checked by: CT P.IENY/RO120061Projecls16515 -06 -0452 Highland Sq 1,2 5 SurveylReportIREC - -HMB Table.xls Highland Square 1, 2, 5 Survey, Clearwater, Florida ,AM CTEC Project 6515-06-0452 LABORATORY ANALYSIS SUMMARY November 27, 2006 Hazardous Building Materials Survey HA = Homogeneous Area LF = Linear Feet ND = None Detected SF = Square Feet Asbestos noted is Chrysotile P.-IENYIR0120061Projectsl6515-06 -0452 Highland Sq 1.2 5 SurveylReportlkbestos Tahle.doc Checked by: CT . .. .................. Q is TN.. ..... ... 00 s:,stti, fs 11 Tenant Space I Floor Tile, 12"x 12", Tan Main Floor Front, F1 1-3 Streaked, w/Mastic Bakery ND Aisle 5 F2 4-5 Floor Tile, 12 "x12 ", Orange Produce (2 layers), Streaked, w/Mastic Register #2 ND Floor Tile, 12 "x12 ", Brown Main Floor - Northeast FS 6-7 Streaked, w/Mastic Comer, ND Main Floor — Front F3 8-9 Floor Tile, 12 "x12 ", Gold Produce ND Streaked, w/Mastic Main Floor — Northeast Comer F4 10-11 Floor Tile, 12"x12", Green, 5% Black Mastic Category I w/Mastic Product (2 layers) (under leveling 1,000 SF Non-Friable See Recommendations compound layer) F5 12-13 Floor Tile, 12 "x12 ", Blue, Frozen Food, ND w/Mastic Seafood (2 layers) F6 14-15 Floor Tile, 12"x12", Red, Seafood (2 layers), - w/Mastic Meat Dept. ND F7 16-17 Floor Tile, 12"x12", Gray, Seafood (2 layers), 5% Black Mastic Category I w/Mastic Frozen Food (under leveling 700 SF Non-Friable See Recommendations compound layer) F9 18-19 Clay Tile, 6" sq., Tan Deli, ND Seafood 1710 20-21 Ceramic Tile, 2" sq., Tan Men's Room, ND Women's Room MS6 22 —23 Ceramic Tile Cove Base, 4" Men's Room, ND Women's Room MS1 24-25 Baseboard, 5", Black Store South Entrance, ND Restroom Foyer MS2 26 Mirror Mastic Men's Room ND MS4 27 Stair Tread Stairs to Mezzanine Level ND MSS ..28 Freezer Insulation Meat Freezer ND HA = Homogeneous Area LF = Linear Feet ND = None Detected SF = Square Feet Asbestos noted is Chrysotile P.-IENYIR0120061Projectsl6515-06 -0452 Highland Sq 1.2 5 SurveylReportlkbestos Tahle.doc Checked by: CT Highland Square 1, -2, 5 Survey, Clearwater, Florida MA CTEC Project 6515-06-0452 LABORATORY ANALYSIS SUMMARY November 27, 2006 Hazardous Building Materials Survey HA = Homogeneous Area ND = None Detected SF = Square Feet Checked by- LF = Linear Feet Asbestos noted is Chrysotile P:4ENVIROl2006IProjeclsl6515-06-0452 Higlitand Sq 1,2 5 SurveyiReporltAsbaslos Table.doc Page 2 of 9 . . ...... ... . ................... ... - ....... ... N.� :: DES T Tenant Space 1— Cont. W4 29-30 Wood Panel Glue South Store Entrance, ND Front Office West Wall, 2% Paint W7 31-35 Drywall/Joint Compound, South Addition South Wall, Texture, 3000 SF , Category 11, See Recommendations East Wall 2% Joint Non-Friable Compound Office Front, W6 36-40 Drywall/Joint Compound Office Hallway, Meat Cooler, 2% Joint 6,000 SF Category H , See Recommendations (old part) Znd Floor, Compound Non-Friable Above Seafood Back Room Deli Soffit, Drywall/Joint Compound — Magazine Area, W15 41-45 North Addition North Wall, ND East Soffit Wall, Restroom Foyer ME2 46 HVAC Duct Work — New Stock Room — South End ND Insulation, Pink ME3 47 — 48 HVAC Duct Work — Old Stock Room — Central, ND Insulation, Yellow Stock room W9 49-50 Ceramic Tile, 4" sq., Tan Deli ND F11 51-52 Floor Tile, 12'IxI2II, Beige Stock Room 5% Floor Tile, 1,000 SF Category 1, See Recommendations w/Gray Streaks 5% Black Mastic Non-Friable Ceiling Panels, 2'x4', Stock Room above. Coolers, C6 53-54 Gypsum Mezzanine Employee ND Breakroom MEI 55-56 Pipe Cover, Black Foam Meat Cooler Area, Back Rubber, Glue Room Pipe Chase ND W12 57 Tan Panel w/ Glue Men's Room ND C5 58-59 Ceiling Tile, 2'x4% Speckled Men's Room ND HA = Homogeneous Area ND = None Detected SF = Square Feet Checked by- LF = Linear Feet Asbestos noted is Chrysotile P:4ENVIROl2006IProjeclsl6515-06-0452 Higlitand Sq 1,2 5 SurveyiReporltAsbaslos Table.doc Page 2 of 9 . . ...... ... . ................... ... - ....... ... Highland Square 1, 2, 5 Survey, Clearwater, Florida MA CTEC Project 6515-06-0452 LABORATORY ANALYSIS SUMMARY November 27, 2006 Hazardous Building Materials Survey HA = Homogeneous Area ND = None Detected LF = Linear Feet Asbestos noted is Chrysotile P•IENVIR0120061Prqlects46515-06-0452 Highland Sq 1,13 SurveyfReporlUshestos Table.doc SF = Square Feet Checked by: CT Page 3 of 9 WTIR.?�N RY4 B 111 18 Tenant Space 1— Cont, Ceiling Tile, 2'x4', C2 60-61 Fiberglass, Plastic Skin, Restroom Foyer, ND Cloth Texture Seafood Hallway Ceiling Tile, 2'x4', C3 62-63 Fiberglass, Plastic Skin, Restroom Foyer, ND Knockdown Texture Produce Prep Area C4 64-65 Ceiling Tile, 2'x4', Gypsum/ Produce Prep Area, Skin Deli ND W2 66-67 Exterior Lower Wall, 4" sq., Exterior Front — South, ND Ceramic Tile Exterior Front — North Exterior — Southwest, W1 68-72 Stucco Exterior — Central, ND Exterior — Northwest Exterior — North Front Entrance, C 1 73-75 Stucco Ceiling, Sand Texture Exterior — North, ND Exterior — South Front Entrance Roof - Southeast Comer, Southwest Comer, RR1 RRI—RR5 Built-up Roof Membrane Northwest Comer, ND Northeast Comer, Center Roof — Northeast Comer, RR2 RR6 — RR9 Built-up Roof Edge Flashing South Center Edge, ND West Edge at Parapet Joint, East Edge Center RR3 RRIO — Parapet Wall Flashing Parapet Wall — South, ND RRI I Parapet Wall — North RR12 — Northwest Comer Exhaust I RR4 RR13 Pitch Pan Fan, ND I East Center Package Unit HA = Homogeneous Area ND = None Detected LF = Linear Feet Asbestos noted is Chrysotile P•IENVIR0120061Prqlects46515-06-0452 Highland Sq 1,13 SurveyfReporlUshestos Table.doc SF = Square Feet Checked by: CT Page 3 of 9 Highland Square 1, 2, 5 Survey, Clearwater, Florida MACTEC Project 6515-06-0452 LABORATORY ANALYSIS SUMMARY November 27, 2006 Hazardous Building Materials Survey HA = Homogeneous Area LF = Linear Feet ND = None Detected SF = Square Feet Asbestos noted is Chrysotile P.-IEArVIR012006tProjeclsl6515-06-0452 Highland Sq 1,2 5 SurveylReporflAsbestos Tabledoc Checked by, CT Page 4 of 9 Sx 71M 'Eq . . . IDE 0N . . . . . . . . Tenant Space 1— Cont. RRS RR14 — Vent Hood Flashing East Center Vent Hood, 5% Roofing 50 SF Category I See Recommendations RR15 Southeast Vent Hood Mastic (5 hoods) Non-Friable RR6 RR 16 Expansion Joint Material Southeast Roof Joint, ND RR17 Southwest Roof Joint RR7 RR18 — Equipment Curb Flashing Northwest Exhaust Fan Curb, ND I RR19 East Center HVAC Unit Curb RR20 — RR8 Pitch Pan Gravel Roof HVAC Unit ND RR21 RR9 RR22 — Equipment Curb Flashing Gravel Roof Exhaust Vent, 5% Roofing 90 SF Category I See Recommendations RR23 Gravel Roof HVAC Unit Mastic (6 curbs) Non-Friable RRIO RR24 — Expansion Joint Material Gravel Roof West Joint, ND RR25 Gravel Roof South Joint/Wall Gravel Roof Southwest RR1 1 RR26 — Parapet Wall Flashing Parapet, 5% Roofing 160 SF Category I See Recommendations RR27 Gravel Roof Northwest Mastic Non-Friable Parapet RR28 — Gravel Roof East Extension, RR12 RR30 Built-up Roof Field Gravel Roof North Side, ND Gravel Roof Northwest Comer Gravel Roof Northwest RR13 RR31 — Built-up Roof Edge Edge, 5,% Roofing Category I . RR32 Membrane Gravel Roof Southeast Mastic 800 SF Non-Friable tions See Recommendations I I I Corner I I I I HA = Homogeneous Area LF = Linear Feet ND = None Detected SF = Square Feet Asbestos noted is Chrysotile P.-IEArVIR012006tProjeclsl6515-06-0452 Highland Sq 1,2 5 SurveylReporflAsbestos Tabledoc Checked by, CT Page 4 of 9 Highland Square 1, 2, 5 Survey, Clearwater, Florida MACTEC Project 6515-064452 LABORATORY ANALYSIS SUMMARY November27,2006 Hazardous Building Materials Survey HA = Homogeneous Area LF = Linear Feet ND = None Detected Asbestos noted is Chrysotile SF = Square Feet Checked by: CS *Sample number 19 and 20 not used 4 P.-IENVIR0120064Projects;6515-06-0432 Highland Sq 1,2 5 SurveylReportlAsbesios Table.doc Page 5 of 9 'ES M'A Fuld, k. T .4 T.0 1 Q'! Fil Vi �IiK Oil! d V: 1", Tenant Space 2 Floor Tile, 12"x12", Tan/ 3% - Floor Tile Category 1, F1 1-2 Brown w/Mastic Main Floor 5% - Black 6,000 SF Non-Friable See Recommendations Mastic F2 3-4 Floor Tile, 12"x12", Main Floor Patches 10% - Black 1,000 SF Category 1, See Recommendations Tan/Dark Brown w/Mastic Mastic Non-Friable F3 5-6 Floor Tile, 12 "x12 ", Blue Restrooms ND w/Mastic F4 7-8_ Floor Tile, 12"x 12", Light Gray Snack Bar ND w/Mastic <1% Paint W1 9-10 Drywall/Joint Compound, Perimeter Texture 3000 SF OSFIA <1% See Recommendations Old <1% Joint , Compound W2 11-12 Drywall/Joint Compound, New Back Room ND MS1 13-14 Wall Panels w/Gray & Tan Perimeter 5% - Gray 500 SF Category 1, See Recommendations Mastic Mastic Non-Friable F6 15-16 Carpet, Tan w/Mastic Platform in Front Room ND MS3 17-18 Baseboard, 4" Black ND MS4 19-20 Mirror Mastic Rear Room Soffit Not Submitted MSS 21-22 Stair Treads Comer Office ND F5 23-24 Floor Tile, 12"x12", Tan Front (patch) 5% - Black 50 SF Category 1, See Recommendations 1 Mottled w/Mastic Mastic Non-Friable MS6 25-26 Caulking, Window Frames Front ND W5 27-29 Texture on Columns Front ND W2 30 32 Stucco, Sand Texture ND W3 33-34 Ceramic Tile, 4" sq., Tan, Front <1% - White 100 SF OSHA <1% See Recommendations . . I Grout - i Adhesive HA = Homogeneous Area LF = Linear Feet ND = None Detected Asbestos noted is Chrysotile SF = Square Feet Checked by: CS *Sample number 19 and 20 not used 4 P.-IENVIR0120064Projects;6515-06-0432 Highland Sq 1,2 5 SurveylReportlAsbesios Table.doc Page 5 of 9 Highland Square 1, 2, 5 Survey, Clearwater, Florida MA CTEC Project 6515-06-0452 LABORATORY ANALYSIS SUMMARY November 27, 2006 Hazardous Building Materials Survey HA = Homogeneous Area ND = None Detected SF = Square Feet LF = Linear Feet Asbestos noted is Chrysotile *Sample number 19 and 20 not used P:IENVIRO{2006IProjectsl6515-06-0452 Highland Sq 1,2 3 SurveyiReporMsbeslos Table.doc Checked by: a Page 6 of 9 9AMP M. MAL 4: tlll _vnw i-IM1111 IT! Tenant Space 2 — Cont. C5 34(a)-35 Ceiling Tile, 2'x4' Main Floor Area ND Fiberglass/Plastic Skin C4 36-37 Ceiling Tile, 2'x4' Leather Main Floor Area ND Texture C3 38-39 Ceiling Tile, 2'x4' Main Floor Area ND Divot/Pinhole C2 40-41 Ceiling Tile, 2'x4' Smooth Main Floor Area ND C7 42-43 Ceiling Tile, 2'x4' Main Floor Area ND Pinhole/Knobby Texture MS1 44-45 Mirror Mastic Upper Back Wall 20% 200 SF Category I See Recommendations Non-Friable C1 46-48 Stucco Ceiling Exterior Walkway ND HA = Homogeneous Area ND = None Detected SF = Square Feet LF = Linear Feet Asbestos noted is Chrysotile *Sample number 19 and 20 not used P:IENVIRO{2006IProjectsl6515-06-0452 Highland Sq 1,2 3 SurveyiReporMsbeslos Table.doc Checked by: a Page 6 of 9 Highland Square 1, 2, 5 Survey, Clearwater, Florida MACTEC Project 6515 -06 -0452 LABORATORY ANALYSIS SUMMARY ..:........... .. .. .. ... ,. . .... SA1VI1'T.,E / .............. ....•....... .. ... _.. _............ .:... , .,......... ............:............ .... . .. .....:...... . .............: .. ,............:.:.... ..:.. ..! . , .. ....,.. .... >..,.. .. ..... .......,..:.:................ _..... ..::...: , .. , .,f... ,a•; t .... :...,:::::.',;,YO _,:+:,> AuPP ale:::., . f : ..f., i >� n.....,...,,r..,,.. -... ,. : , t � Its I . , �:'i_ �1Il,ill' I ( ., (�•f.� � 1 = ..h ;iil ji. � : I,i .Lv .s f... s ., „ill.. , I I ...L ... t ,•s . ,:.:<,_, MATE AL DES CRrPTION .... .. : SAMPLE <. ,,:; > i Si IAP ; ; , ~�' T .G.. , �Ye< ;,;,,, ;;; ; ' �;;l'': "'�` ss +''; i•,'•nu . s ......: , .. :' ,....:'::.. f , •: {,., . ,:, ft, � s , ,�.;,,, Tenant Space 5 W6 1-2 Drywall /Joint Compound New Restroom, Wall ND W1 3-5 Texture on Column Exterior ND W2 6-7 Drywall /Joint Compound, Old under front window Interior <1% - Joint Compound 200 SF OSHA <1% See Recommendations W3 8-10 Drywall/Joint Compound, Interior ND w/Stippled Texture (perimeter) Drywall/Joint Compound, W4 11 —13 w /Stippled Texture (nursery Interior ND partition/office partition) W5 14-15 Drywall/Joint Compound, Interior ND w/Stippled Texture erimeter W6 18-19 Drywall/Joint Compound (new Interior ND conference room/new partition) Floor Tile, 12 11x12 ", Tan F1 20-21 w/Light Brown Streaks Interior 5% - Black 5,000 SF Category I, See Recommendations w/Mastic Mastic Non - Friable F2 22-23 Floor Tile, 12 "x12 ", Tan, Interior 5% - Floor Tile 10% - Black 5,000 SF Category I, See Recommendations Mottled w/Mastic Non - Friable Mastic F3 24-25 Carpet, Purple; Floor Tile w/Mastic 2 °d layer) ( Front Reception 5% - Floor Tile 10% - Black 700 SF Category I g y ° See Recommendations y Mastic Non - Friable F4 26 Floor Tile, 12 "x12", Pink Interior 10% - Black 5 SF Category I, See Recommendations w/Mastic Mastic Non - Friable MS 1 27-28 Baseboard, 4 ", Gray w/Mastic Interior ND MS2 29-30 Baseboard, 4 ", Black w/Mastic Interior ND MS3 31-32 Carpet, Green; Floor Tile w/Mastic (2 °d layer) Nursery 5% - Floor Tile 10% - Black 150 SF Category I See Recommendations Mastic Non -Fri ble C9 33— 34 Drywall /Joint Compound Interior —New Restroom ND Ceilin 11411 — 1Vullc LJCLGGLCU LF = Linear Feet Asbestos noted is Chrysotile P:IENVIROQ006lProjectsl6515 -06 -0452 Highland Sq 1,2 5 SurveylReporlWsbestos Table.doc or =square reet *Sample number 16 and 17 not used C tleckeei by: 41 Page 7 of 9 Highland Square 1, 2, 5 Survey, Clearwater, Florida AM CTEC Project 6515-06-0452 LABORATORY ANALYSIS SUMMARY HA = Homogeneous Area ND = None Detected LF = Linear Feet Asbestos noted is Chrysotile P:IENYIRO12006IProjectsl6515-06-0452 Highland Sq 1,2 5 SurveylReportWsbestos Table.doc - ----------- --- - SF = Square Feet *Sample number 16 and 17 not used Checked by: C1 Page 8 of 9 ........ .... -A' L'', D" M t" AHON' S Tenant Space 5 — Cont. MS6 35-36 Caulk on Window Frames Front ND MS7 37-38 Ceramic Tile, White Window Ledge <1% - White Adhesive 200 SF 0SlElA <1% See Recommendations C7 39-40 Ceiling Tile, 2'x4' Knock- down Texture Main Floor Area ND C4 41-42 Ceiling Tile, 2'x4' Smooth Main Floor Area ND C6 43-44 Ceiling Tile, 2'x4' Wormhole Main Floor Tile ND C5 45-46 Ceiling Tile, 2'x4' Speckled Main Floor Tile ND C8 47-48 Ceiling Tile, 2'x4' Stippled Office ND C9 49 -50 Drywall Joint Compound Restroom Ceiling ND Cl 51 -53 Stucco Exterior Walkway Ceiling ND HA = Homogeneous Area ND = None Detected LF = Linear Feet Asbestos noted is Chrysotile P:IENYIRO12006IProjectsl6515-06-0452 Highland Sq 1,2 5 SurveylReportWsbestos Table.doc - ----------- --- - SF = Square Feet *Sample number 16 and 17 not used Checked by: C1 Page 8 of 9 Highland Square 7, 2, 5 Survey, Clearwater, Florida MACTEC Project 6515-06-0452 LABORATORY ANALYSIS SUMMARY November 27, 2006 Hazardous Building Materials Survey HA = Homogeneous Area LF = Linear Feet ND = None Detected SF = Square Feet Asbestos noted is Chrysotile P:tENVIR000061Projectsl6515-06-0432 Highland Sq 1.2 5 SurveyReportWsbestos Tabledoc Checked by: CT Page 9 of 9 : fO W W TV. ..... ........ "TI" LP M AMP'.; LEILQ S .J .................. Nil Tenant Spaces (TS) 2 and 5 Roof TS-2 - Center Roof, RI RF1 -RF4 Built-up Roof Membrane Southwest Comer ND TS-5 - Northeast Comer, West Center TS-2 - Northeast Comer Edge, R2 RF5 - RF8 Built-up Roof Edge Flashing South Center Edge ND TS-5 - North Center Edge, South Center Edge RF9 - TS-2 - Center HVAC Unit 10% 33 SF Category I R3 RF11 Pitch Pan TS-5 - East HVAC Unit, See Recommendations West HVAC Unit Roofing Mastic (33 boxes) Non-Friable TS-2 - East Center HVAC RF12 - Unit, R4 RF 15 Equipment Curb Flashing West HVAC Unit ND TS-5 - East HVAC Unit, Southeast HVAC Unit' RF16 - TS-2 - East Wall 2% Category I R5 RF18 Parapet Wall Flashing TS-5 - Northeast Wall, 660 SF See Recommendations Southeast Wall Roofing Mastic Non-Friable 19- Roof Vent Hood Flashing TS-2 - Center Hood 2% 120 SF Category I See Recommendations ?2 0 f I TS-5 - East Center Hood Roofing Mastic (12 hoods) Non-Friable 1 —1 HA = Homogeneous Area LF = Linear Feet ND = None Detected SF = Square Feet Asbestos noted is Chrysotile P:tENVIR000061Projectsl6515-06-0432 Highland Sq 1.2 5 SurveyReportWsbestos Tabledoc Checked by: CT Page 9 of 9 : Highland Square 1, 2, S, Clearwater, Florida MACTEC Project 651 5 -06 -0451 Tech: C. Thoma Date: 11/13/2006 Table 3 Tenant Space #1 November 27, 2606 Hazardous Materials Building Survey Reading No. Specific Location Component Substrate Color Condition Test Reading m /cm2 Extrapolated Result (ppm) 2 Calibration 1.1 3 Calibration 1.1 4 Calibration 1.1 5 Wail A - Main Floor Paneling Wood Peach Good 0.00 BDL 6 Wall A - Main Floor Decorative Letters Plastic Red Good 2.3 11,500 7 Wall A - Main Floor Counter Wood Varnish Good 0.04 200 8 Wall D - Main Floor Door Metal Cream Fair 0.00 BDL 9 Wall D - Main Floor Door Jamb Metal Cream Fair 0.00 BDL 10 Wall D - Main Floor Paneling Wood Varnish Good 0.00 BDL 11 Wall D - Main Floor Wall Drywall Peach Fair 0.00 BDL 12 Wall D - Main Floor Wall Drywall Teal Good . 0.01 50 I3 Wall D - Main Floor Wall Drywall Red Good 0.00 BDL 14 Wall A - Office Wall Drywall White Good 0.00 BDL 15 Wall D - Main Floor Magazine Rack Wood Cream Good 0.00 BDL 16 Wall D - Main Floor Decorative Letters Plastic Brown Good 0.3 1,500 17 Wall D -.Main Floor Support Column Metal White Fair 0.03 150 18 Wall A - Bakery Wall Dgwall Cream Good 0.00 BDL 19 Wall C - Main Floor Wall Trim Wood White Good 0.00 BDL 20 Wall C - Main Floor Paneling Wood Cream Good 0.00 BDL 21 Wall C - Main Floor Wall Drywall Peach Good 0.00 BDL 22 Wall C - Main Floor Wall Drywall Teal Good -0.33 BDL 23 Wall C - Main Floor Wall Drywall Red Good 0.00 BDL 24 Wall D - Back Hallway Paneling Wood Varnish Good 0.00 BDL 25 Wall C - Back Hallwa Door Metal Gray Fair 0.00 BDL 26 Wall C - Back Hallway Door Jamb Metal Gray Fair 0,01 50 27 Wall C - Stock Room Wall Concrete Block Yellow Good -0.5 BDL 28 Wail D - Stock Room Wall Wood Yellow Fair 0.00 BDL Notes: nig/cm2 = milligrams per square centimeter ppm = parts per million P: \ENVIRO \2006\Projects \65I5 -06 -0452 Highland Sq 1,2 5 Survey\Report\Tenant Space l.xls Page 1 of 2 C Highland Square 1, 2, 5, Clearwater, Florida MACTEC Project 6515 -06 -0452 Table 3 Tenant Space #1 November 27, 2006 Hazardous Materials Building Survey Reading No. Specific Location Component Substrate Color Condition Test Reading (mg/cm 2 Extrapolated Result (ppm) 29 Wall D - Stock Room Wall Wood Red Good 0.00 BDL 30 Wall C - Stock Room Door Wood Yellow Fair 0.00 BDL 31 Wall D - Stock Room Wall Concrete BIock Green Fair -0.1 BDL 32 Wall D - Stock Room Wall Concrete Block Yellow Fair 0.00 BDL 33 Wall A - Stock Room Wall Wood Green Fair 0.01 50 34 Wall A - Stock Room Wall Wood Yellow Fair 0.00 BDL 35 Wall A - Mezzanine Handrail Panel Wood Oranize Fair 0.41 2,050 36 Mezzanine - Mech. Room Floor Concrete Red Fair 0.00 BDL 37 Mezzanine - Mech. Room Floor Wood Red Fair 0.00 BDL 38 Wall C - Mezzanine Mech. Room Door Metal Cream Fair 0.07 350 39 Wall C - Mezzanine Mech. Room Door Jamb Metal Cream Fair 0.02 100 40 Wall C - Break Room Wall Concrete Block Yellow Fair 0.01 50 41 Wall A - Mezzanine Hand Rail Metal Black Fair 0.12 600 42 Wall B - Stock Room Door Jamb Metal Black Fair 0.01 50 43 Wall A - Veggie Prep. Wall Wood Yellow Fair 0.02 100 44 Wall B Wall Concrete Block Yellow Fair -0.3 BDL 45 Wall A - Main Floor Wall Drywall Peach Fair -0.6 BDL 46 Wall A - Main Floor Wall Drywall Teal Fair -0.6 BDL 47 Wall A - Main Floor Wall Drywall Red Fair 0.00 BDL 48 Exterior Column Concrete Yellow Fair 0.01 50 49 Exterior Floor Concrete Gray Fair 0.02 100 50 Exterior Store Front Stucco Yellow Fair 0.00 BDL 53 Calibration 1.0 54 Calibration 1,2 55 Calibration 1.1 Checked by: L1 Notes: mg/cmz = milligrams per square centimeter ppm = parts per million P: \ENVIRO\2006 \Projects \6515 -06 -0452 Highland Sq 1,2 5 Survey\ReportUenant Space l.xls Page 2 of 2 Highland Square 1, 2, 5, Clearivater, Florida MACTEC Project 6515 -06 -0452 Tech: C. Thoma Date: 11/9/2006 Table 3 Tenant Space #2 November 27, 2006 Hazardous Building Materials Survey Reading No. Specific Location Component Substrate Color Condition Test Reading m Cin Extrapolated Result (ppm) Location: Front Room 4 Calibration 1.1 5 Calibration 1.2 6 Calibration 1 7 C Wall Wall Concrete Block Red Good 0.00 BDL 8 C Wall Wall Wood Panel Red Good 0.00 BDL 9 C Wall Baseboard Vinyl Black Good 0.01 50 10 D Wall Wall Wood Yellow Good 0.00 BDL 11 D Wall Door Wood Yellow Good 0.00 BDL 12 D Wall Door Jamb Metal White Good 0.01 50 13 D Wall Window Frame Wood White Good 0.00 BDL 14 D Wall Wall Wood White Good 0.00 BDL 15 D Wail Wall Wood Black Good 0.00 BDL 16 D Wall Window Ledge Wood Black Good 0.00 BDL 17 D Wall Window Frame Metal Black Good -0.4 BDL 18 D Wall Door Metal Black Good -0.3 BDL 19 D Wall Door Jamb Metal Black Good -0.5 BDL 20 A Wall Wall Wood Red Good 0.00 BDL 21 A Wall Baseboard Vinyl Red Good 0.00 BDL 22 A Wall Wall Concrete Block Red Good 0.00 BDL 23 Center Wall Wood Black Good 0.00 BDL 24 Center Window Ledge Wood GM Good 0.01 50 25 Center Door Frame Wood Gray Good 0.00 BDL 26 Center Wall Wood Pink Good 0.00 BDL 27 Center Wall Wood White Good 0.00 BDL 28 B Wall Cabinet Wood Gray Good 0.00 BDL 29 B Wall Shelves Wood Lt. Blue Good -0.02 BDL Notes: mg/cmZ = milligrams per square centimeter ppm = parts per million P: \ENV1RO \20061Projects \6515 -06 -0452 Highland Sq 1,2 5 Survey \Report \Tennant Space 2.xls Page 1 of 2 Highland Square 1, 2. 5, Clearwater, Florida MACTEC Project 6515 -06 -0452 Table 3 Tenant Space #2 November 27, 2006 Hazardous Building Materials Survey Reading No. Specific Location Component Substrate Color Condition Test Reading m /CmZ Extrapolated Result (ppm) Front Room - Cont. 30 B Wall Wall D all Red Good 0.00 BDL 31 B Wall Baseboard Wood Red Good 0.00 BDL 32 B Wall Wall Wood White Good 0.00 BDL 33 B Wall Door Metal Blue Good 0.00 BDL 34 B Wall Door Jamb Metal Blue Good 0.00 BDL Location: Back Area 35 Ladies Room - A Wall Wall Drywall White Good 0.01 50 36 Ladies Room - A Wall Door Wood White Good 0.00 BDL 37 Ladies Room - A Wall Door Jamb Wood White Good 0.00 BDL 38 Men's Room - C Wall Wall Drywall White Good 0.00 BDL 39 Men's Room- C Wall Door Wood White Good 0.00 BDL 40 Men's Room - C Wall Door Jamb Wood White Good 0.00 BDL 41 Exterior Door - B Wall Door Metal Brown Good 0.07 350 42 Exterior Door - B Wall Door Jamb Metal Brown Good 0.15 750 Location: Front Room 43 Podium Stand - C Wall Podium Wood Yellow Good 0.00 BDL 44 Podium Stand - C Wall Podium Wood BIack Good 0.00 BDL 45 Podium Stand - C Wall Podium Stand Wood Lt. Blue Good 0.07 350 46 Podium Stand - C Wall Podium Stand Wood Yellow Good 0.00 BDL 46 Exterior - A Wall Wall Stucco Cream Good 0.01 50 47 Exterior - A Wall Window Ledge Brick Gray Good 0.04 200 Location: Back Area 48 Floor Floor Concrete Dk. Gray Fair 0.00 BDL 49 Floor Floor Concrete Lt. Gray Fair 0.00 BDL 50 Calibration 1.4 51 Calibration . i.0 52 Calibration 0,9 Checked by: Notes: mg /cmZ = milligrams per square centimeter ppm = parts per million P: \ENV1RO\2006 \Projects \6515 -06 -0452 Highland Sq 1,2 5 Survey \Report \Tennant Space 2.xls U- Page 2 of 2 Highland Square 1, 2, 5, Clearwater, Florida iYM4CTECProject 6515 -06 -0452 Tech: C. Thoma Date: 11/9/2006 Table 3 . Tenant Space #5 November 27, 2006 Hazardous Building Materials Survey Reading No. Specific Location Component Substrate Color Condition Test Reading m /cmZ Extrapolated Result (ppm) Location: Main Room 2 Calibration 1.1 3 Calibration 1.1 4 Calibration 1.1 5 C Wall Wall Wood Maroon Good -0.8 BDL 6 C Wall Wall Drywall Cream Good 0.00 BDL 7 C Wall Window Frame Wood Maroon :Good 0.00 BDL 8 C Wall Door Wood Varnish Good 0.00 BDL 9 C Wall Door Jamb Wood Maroon Good -0.2 BDL 10 C Wall Wall Drywall Maroon Good -0.7 BDL 11 C Wall Wall Concrete Block Cream Good 0.01 50 12 C Wall Baseboard Vinyl Gray Good -0.2 BDL 13 C Wall Door Wood Maroon Good 0.7 3,500 14 C Wall Door Jamb Metal Maroon Good 0.6 2,500 15 B Wall C66 Area Wood Maroon Good -0.3 BDL 16 B Wall Partition Wall Drywall Maroon Good 0.00 BDL 17 B Wall Wall Drywall Maroon Good -0.7 BDL 18 B Wall Wall Concrete Block Cream Good 0.3 1,500 19 A Wall Wall Drywall White & Good 0.4 2,000 20 A Wall Wall Concrete Block White & Good 0.5 2,500 21 A Wall Decorative Pillar Wood Maroon Good 0.00 BDL 22 A Wall Decorative Pillar Wood Gray Good 0.00 BDL 23 A Wall Decorative Pillar Wood Green Good 0.00 BDL 24 A Wall Stage Ede Wood Gray Good 0.00 BDL 25 A Wall Partition Wall Wood Cream Good 0.00 1 BDL Notes: mg /cmZ = milligrams per square centimeter ppm = parts per million P: \ENVIRO\2006 \Projects \6515 -06 -0452 Highland Sq 1,2 5 Survey \Report \Tennant Space S.xls Page 1 of 3 Highland Square 1, 2, 5, Clearwater, Florida Table 3 November 27, 2006 MACTEC Project 6515 -06 -0452 Tenant Space #5 Hazardous Building Materials Survey Reading No Specific Location Component Substrate Color Condition Test Reading (MR/em) Extrapolated Result (ppm) Main Room - Cont. 26 A Wall Partition Wall Drywall Maroon Good 0.1 500 27 A Wall Window Frame Wood Cream Good 0.00 BDL 28 Center Room Partition Wall D all Gray Good 0.01 50 29 Center Room Partition Wall Drywall Maroon Good 0.01 50 30 Center Room Stand Trim Wood Gray Good 0.00 BDL 31 Center Room Stand Front Wood Maroon Good 0.00 BDL Location: Nursery 32 B Wall Wall Drywall Green Good 0.3 1,500 33 B Wall Wall Concrete Block Blue Good 0.4 2,000 34 B Wall Partition Wall Wood Yellow Good 0.00 BDL 35 B Wall Partition Wall Wood Green Good 0.00 BDL 36 B Wall Partition Wall Wood Lt. Blue Good 0.00 BDL 37 B Wall Stage Wood Black Good 0.00 BDL 38 C Wall. Wall Wood Green Good 0.00 BDL 39 C Wall Wall Wood Black Good 0.00 BDL 40 C Wall Wall Wood Brown Good 0.00 BDL 41 C Wall Wall Wood Lt, Blue Good 0.00 BDL 42 C Wall Wall Wood Yellow Good 0.00 BDL 43 C Wall Wall Wood Red Good 0.00 BDL 44 C Wall Wall Wood Gra Good 0.01 50 45 C Wall Door Wood Black Good 0.00 BDL 46 C Wall Door Jamb Wood Black Good 0.01 50 Location: Office 47 A Wall Wall Drywall BIue Good 0.6 3,000 48 B Wall Window Frame Wood Blue Good 0.05 250 49 C Wall Door Wood Varnish Good 0.00 BDL 50 C Wall Door Frame Wood Blue Good 0.3 1,500 51 C Wall Baseboard Vinyl Gray Good -0.2 BDL Notes: mg /cm2 = milligrams per square centimeter ppm = parts per million P: \ENV1.RO\2006 \Projects \6515 -06 -0452 Highland Sq 1,2 5 Survey \Report \Tennant Space 5.xls Page 2 of 3 Highland Square 1, 2, 5, Clearwater, Florida MACTECProject 6515 -06 -0452 Table 3 Tenant Space ##5 November 27, 2006 Hazardous Building Materials Survey Reading No, Specific Location Component Substrate Color Condition Test Reading m /Cm2 Extrapolated Result (ppm) Location: Conference Room 52 B Wall Wall Frame Wood Varnish Good 0.00 BDL 53 D Wall Wall Concrete Block White Good 0.02 100 54 D Wall Wall Drywall Blue Good 0.4 2,000 55 A Wall Wall Wood Blue Good -0.3 BDL Location: Restrooms 56 A Wall Wall D all Maroon Good 0.00 BDL 57 A Wall Wall Drywall Cream Good 0.00 BDL 58 B Wall Door Wood Maroon Good 0.01 50 59 B Wall Door Jamb Wood Maroon Good 0.00 BDL 60 Calibration 1.00 61 Calibration 1.1 62 Calibration 1.00 Checked by: CT Notes: mg/cm2 = milligrams per square centimeter ppm = parts per million P: \ENVIRO \2006\Projects \6515 -06 -0452 Highland Sq 1,2 5 Survey \Report\Tennant Space5.xls Page 3 of 3 i FIGURES 6515 -06 -045201 HIGHLANDS SQUARE 1815 HIGHLANDS AVE. NORTH CLEARWATER, FLORIDA J MACTEC SITE PLAN Project 6515 -06 -0452 Figure 1 1 a'ro.o• _ 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 11 PHASE y RESTA,4RANT l'� 160.0 r � �. 6 -... 11 f0 • y0 ; ...,_ ' a i J do —U— + , ^ I . _ — �16ao• I u 1O ...._ �i i {0 i t � u IIti'' � � 5 BANKS MN R PYLON 51QN �i r% _-4 oI ,; Ell NORTH • ---- - ----- GREENLEA ROAD - -- ._ ._...._.____ _ .. ._.__• _ X I / Prepared /Date: JT 11/27/06 Checked/Date: CC' It (2,Z jal HIGHLANDS SQUARE 1815 HIGHLANDS AVE. NORTH CLEARWATER, FLORIDA J MACTEC SITE PLAN Project 6515 -06 -0452 Figure 1 20,22,26,57,58,59 60,62 LEGEND: 3— SAMPLE LOCATION eme- ae -obzm • EMPLOtEE SECOND FLOOR MEZZANINE saEAxROOM 54 28 55 PROWCE � 52 --• 56 53-1 J PREY 63,64 - ForEa MEN$aR 21,23 �51 sm"ROOM 39 27 40 MEAr I + 61 f 44 I 38 46,47,48 I 34 .---9 I 15 19,35 �6 j I 13,14,16 i i I I � I I. 43 I I f 3'---' j •----11 - MAIN I I I —12,17 r 49 i 10 —#- 50 41 42 34 37 ancES 30,36 ~— 5 8 I —4 4 MV - eAMY 2 �--- 65 PROOUCEj at= 24,29,31 33 f 18 r7 1 I I 1 cvsm IR sEaHCE AREA ' 72 73 i �, " PreperedJOate: JT 11127/D6 67 71 74 70 69� 66 68 CheckedMate; Cr it - HIGHLANDS SQUARE 1815 HIGHLA NDS AVE. NO RTH MACTEC SAMPLE LOCATIONS TENANT SPACE #1(rLOOR PLAN) CLEARWATER, FLORIDA Project 6515 -06 -0462 Figure 2 RR13 ----• ROOF SAMPLE LOCATION RR29 RR28 RR22 RR32 j RR4 RR20 ---• I RR13 -+ I I I � RR6 RR21 I I I I RR25 -• R RR24 I I I I I I j I RR2 3 -- - ` - -- RR18 RR12 " RR30 3 RRR27 RR3 RR11 VRR9 - - RR14 ROOF 05 ---• RRB HIGHLANDS SQUARE 1878 HIGHLANDS AVE. NORTH CLEARWATER, FLORIDA •- RR19 K1 I I I I I I I I I RR7 ---+ I I I I I t t RR16 ---- -+ RR15 MA CTEC 28 26 LEGEND: 3 -+ SAMPLE LOCATION HIGHLANDS SQUARE R2 ROOF SAMPLE LOCATION 1615 HIGHLANDS AVE. NORTHMACTEC CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 5 6 R.R. �12 -- R.R. R.R. ] 8 j SrORAG SNACK BAR 11 44,45----* 18 39 -- 38,40,41 42,43 NON- SMOKING 4 —2 10 34,35 36,37 SMOKING 15,16 14 33 43,17 21,22 /� 23 25 oF�cs r 24,34 +ssnsucs 30,31,32 29 - —• 48 47 46 =27 28 26 LEGEND: 3 -+ SAMPLE LOCATION HIGHLANDS SQUARE R2 ROOF SAMPLE LOCATION 1615 HIGHLANDS AVE. NORTHMACTEC CLEARWATER, FLORIDA ?,43,44 5� �51 4J 31,32 L 53 J 3 HIGHLANDS AVE. SQUARE NO 1815 HIGHLANDS AVE NORTH CLEARWATER, FLORIDA R17 7 �---- R3 R2O RIO -=- �--- R7 ROOF _ R14 .- R4 Rit =• rMACTEC 17 ;W� 1111110 11, 1, APPENDIXA SAMPLE LIST OF SUSPECT ASBESTOS-CONTAINING MATERIALS APPENDIXA SAMPLE LIST OF SUSPECT ASBESTOS-CONTAINING MATERIALS SAMPLE LIST OF SUSPECT ASBESTOS - CONTAINING MATERIALS Cement Pipes Elevator Brake Shoes Cement Wall Board HVAC Duct Insulation Cement Siding Boiler Insulation Asphalt Floor Tile Breeching Insulation Vinyl Floor Tile Ductwork Flexible Fabric Connections Vinyl Sheet Flooring Cooling Towers Flooring Backing Pipe Insulation (Corrugated Air -Cell, etc.) Heating & Electrical Ducts Construction Mastics (Flooring, Carpet, etc.) Acoustical Plaster Electrical Panel Partitions Decorative Plaster Electrical Cloth Textured Paints /Coatings Electrical Wiring Insulation Ceiling Tiles & Lay -in Panels Chalkboards Spray - applied Insulation Roofing Shingles Blown -in Insulation Roofing Felts Fireproofing Materials Base Flashings Taping Compounds (Thermal) Thermal Paper Products Fire Doors Packing Materials (Wall,.Flooring Penetrations) High Temperature Gaskets Caulking/Putties Laboratory Hoods/Table Tops Adhesives Laboratory Gloves Wallboard Fire Blankets Joint Compound Fire Curtains Vinyl Wall coverings Elevator Equipment Panels Spackling Compounds NOTE: This list does not include every product /material that may contain asbestos. It is intended as a general guide to show which types of materials may contain asbestos. t')USEPA Document 20 T -2003, July 1990, "Managing Asbestos in Place, A Building Owner's Guide to Operations and Maintenance Programs for Asbestos - Containing Materials." .- 'y' L �' S 2 : �• 1 - Cdr ;� .� 4p: - S P,G1 ,« k �� %. �' k yy.. { i PLM REPORT SUMMARY Cates Laboratories NVLAP Lab No. 200569 -0 f` 613 S. Bois D'Arc TDH License No. 30 -0287 7 Forney, Texas 75126 (972) 564 -4723 Client: MACTEC Engineering & Consulting, Inc. Lab Job No.: PLM -01517 Project: Highland Square -Tenants' Space #1 Report Date: 11/16/2006 Project No: 6515 - 06-0452 Sample Date: 11 /10/2006 Identification: Asbestos, Bulk Sample Analysis Test Method: Polarized Light Microscopy /Dispersion Staining (PLM/DS) EPA Method 600/R- 93/116 Pagel of8 On 11113/2006, seventy-five (75) bulk samples were submitted by Ms. Carol Thoma of MACTEC Engineering & Consulting, Inc. for asbestos analysis by PLM/DS. Copies of the lab data sheets are attached; additional information may be found therein. The results are summarized below'. Lab Client Sample Description/Location Asbestos Content Sample No. Field I.D. CL068826 1 Floor Tile, 12" X 12" Tan Streaked w/Mastic - Main Floor Front 1 None Detected - Floor Tile None Detected - Black Mastic CL068827 2 Floor Tile, 12" X 12" Tan Streaked w/Mastic - Bakery None Detected - Floor Tile None Detected - Black Mastic CL068828 3 Floor Tile, 12" X 12" Tan Streaked w/Mastic - Aisle 5 None Detected - Floor Tile None Detected - Black Mastic CL068829 . 4 Floor Tile, 12" X 12" Orange Streaked w/Mastic (2 layers) - Produce None Detected - Floor Tile None Detected - Clear Adhesive None Detected - Leveling Compound CL068830 5 Floor Tile, 12" X 12" Orange Streaked w/Mastic (2 layers) - Register #2 None Detected - Floor Tile None Detected - Black Mastic None Detected - Leveling Compound CL068831 6 Floor Tile, 12" X 12" Brown Streaked w/Mastic - Main Floor, Northeast None Detected - Floor Tile Corner None Detected - Black Mastic CL068832 7 Floor Tile, 12" X 12" Brown Streaked w/Mastic - Main Floor, Front None Detected - Floor Tile None Detected - Black Mastic CL068833 8 Floor Tile, 12" X 12" Gold Streaked w/Mastic - Produce None Detected - Floor Tile None Detected - Black Mastic CL068834 9 Floor Tile, 12" X 12" Gold Streaked w/Mastic - Main Floor, Northeast None Detected - Floor Tile Comer None Detected -Black Mastic ;.:::::...:......._..:.,.:.,._.....::...: Floor -,Tile .12':': X;12" : Green w/Masfic: 2tla .ers '- Producels; ' :'; i ;: _'::<:.;- ;. ;:`. .,:...:..:.:,......_ ...::....:. :.(...... y.:....)......:.:...._...::.,::.:..,..:...:.,:....._..::...... :.........:.:..- >None:Detected :Floor:,Tile` ...:._.:.,_::.. .. one Deteited Clear ,Adhesive '_ °None :Detected:- Legeling_Compound `5% siihle Black Masao'; CL068836 11 Floor Tile, 12" X 12" Green w/Mastic (2 layers) - Produce None Detected - Floor Tile None Detected - Black Mastic None Detected - Leveling Compound These samples were analyzed by layers. The overall percent asbestos for the sample is reported when relevant. The EPA considers a material to be asbestos containing only if it contains greater than one percent asbestos by Calibrated Visual Area Estimation (CVAE), EPA regulations also indicate that Regulated Asbestos Containing Materials (RACM) — materials that are friable or may become friable — be further analyzed by point counting when the results indicate less than ten percent asbestos by . CVAE. CatesLab utilizes CVAE on a routine basis and does not include point counting unless specifically requested by the client. The results may not be reproduced except in full. Ct PLM REPORT SUMMARY - r Cates Laboratories NVLAP Lab No. 200569 -0 613S. Bois D'Arc TDH License No. 30 -0287 Forney, Texas 75126 (972)564 -4723 Client: MACTEC Engineering & Consulting, Inc. Lab Job No.: PLM -01517 Project: Highland Square - Tenants' Space #1 Report Date: 11/16/2006 Project No: 6515 -06 -0452 Sample Date: 11/10/2006 Identification: Asbestos, Bulk Sample Analysis Test Method: Polarized Light Microscopy /Dispersion Staining (PLM/DS) EPA Method 600/R- 93/116 Page 2 of 8 On 11/13/2006, seventy -five (75) bulk samples were submitted by Ms. Carol Thoma of MACTEC Engineering & Consulting, Inc. for asbestos analysis by PLM/DS. Copies of the lab data sheets are attached; additional information may be found therein. The results are summarized below: Lab Client Sample Description/Location Asbestos Content Sample No. Field X.D. CL068837 12 Floor Tile, 12" X 12" Blue w/Mastic - Frozen Food None Detected - Floor Tile None Detected - Black Mastic None Detected - Leveling Compound CL068838. 13 Floor Tile, I2" X 12" Blue w/Mastic (2 layers) - Seafood None Detected - Floor Tile None Detected - Black Mastic None Detected - Leveling Compound CL068839 14 Floor Tile, 12" X 12" Red w/Mastic (2 layers) - Seafood None Detected - Floor Tile None Detected - Black Mastic None Detected - Leveling Compound CL068840 15 Floor Tile, 12" X 12" Red w/Mastic - Meat Department None Detected - Floor Tile None Detected - Black Mastic None Detected - Leveling Compound CLO68841 16 Floor Tile, 12" X 12" Gray w/Mastic (2 layers) - Seafood None Detected - Floor Tile None Detected - Black Mastic None Detected - Leveling Compound CLQ68842 17 Floor Ttle, 12' X 12' Gray w/Mashc Frozen Food None Detected Floor Ttle , " /None Detected Clear Adhesive None�Detectid' Ieveling;;Compound S %Chrysotde B1ackMasttc CL068843 I8 Clay Tile, 6" X 6" Tan - Deli None Detected - Tile None Detected - Grout None Detected - Mortar CL068844 19 Clay Tile, 6" X 6" Tan - Seafood None Detected - Tile None Detected - Grout None Detected - Mortar CL068845 20 Ceramic Tile, 2" X 2" Tan - Men's Room None Detected - Ceramic Tile None Detected - Grout None Detected - Adhesive These samples were analyzed by layers. The overall percent asbestos for the sample is reported when relevant. The EPA considers a material to be asbestos containing only if it contains greater than one percent asbestos by Calibrated Visual Area Estimation (CVAE). EPA regulations also indicate that Regulated Asbestos Containing Materials (RACM) — materials that are friable or may become friable —be further analyzed by point counting when the results indicate less than ten percent asbestos by CVAE. CatesLab utilizes CVAE on a routine basis and does not include point counting unless specifically requested by the client. The results may not be reproduced except in full. c� PLM REPORT SUMMARY Cates laboratories NVLAP Lab No.'200569 -0 6 613 S. Bois D'Arc TDH License No. 30 -0287 Forney, Texas 75126 (972) 564 -4723 Client: MACTEC Engineering & Consulting, Inc. Lab .lob No.: PLM -01517 Project: Highland Square -Tenants' Space 91 Report Date: 11/1612006 Project No: ' 6515 -06 -0452 Sample Date: 11/10/2006 Identification: Asbestos, Bulk Sample Analysis Test Method: Polarized Light Microscopy /Dispersion Staining (PLM/DS) EPA Method 600 /R- 93/116 Page 3 of 8 On 11113/2006, seventy -five (75) bulk samples were submitted by Ms. Carol Thoma of MACTEC Engineering & Consulting, Inc. for asbestos analysis by PLMMS. Copies of the lab data sheets are attached; additional information may be found therein. The results are summarized below: Lab Client Sample Description/Location Asbestos Content Sample No. Field I.D. CLO68846 21 Ceramic Tile, 2" X 2" Tan - Women's Room None Detected - Ceramic Tile None Detected - Grout None Detected - Adhesive CL068947 22 4" Ceramic Tile Cove Base - Men's Room None Detected - Ceramic Tile None Detected - Grout CLO68848 23 4" Ceramic Tile Cove Base - Women's Room None Detected - Ceramic Tile None Detected - Grout CL068949 24 5" Baseboard, Black - Store South Entrance None Detected CL069850 25 5" Baseboard, Black - Restroom Foyer None Detected CL069851 26 Mirror Mastic - Men's Room None Detected CL068852 27 Stair Tread - Stars to Mezzanine Level None Detected - Stair Tread None Detected - Black Mastic None Detected - Brown Mastic CLM853 28 Freezer Insulation - Meat Freezer None Detected CL068854 29 Wood Panel Glue - South Store Entrance None Detected CL068855 30 Wood Panel Glue - Front Office None Detected CL068856 31 Drywall / Joint Compound - South Addition - West Wall None Detected - Joint Tape None Detected - Joint Compound None Detected - Paper None Detected - Wallboard Material CL068857 32 Drywall / J6i Compotirid South'Addttton. South Wall 2 °� Chrysotrle Patnt Texture. .. None Detected Joint Tape 2 %o Clirysotik:" Joint Compound None Dete.;cted Paper ; None Detected Wallboard Ivlateri These samples were analyzed by layers. The overall percent asbestos for the sample is reported when relevant The EPA considers a material to be asbestos containing only if it contains greater than one percent asbestos by Calibrated Visual Area Estimation (CVAE). EPA regulations also indicate that Regulated Asbestos Containing Materials (RACM) — materials that are friable or may become friable — be further analyzed by point counting when the results indicate less than ten percent asbestos by CVAE. CatesLab utilizes CVAE on a routine basis and does not include point counting unless specifically requested by the client. The results may not be reproduced except in full. CT PLM REPORT SUMMARY Cates Laboratories NVLAP Lab No. 200569-0 t 613 S. Bois D Arc TDH License No. 30 -0287 Forney, Texas 75126 (972) 5644723 Client: MACTEC Engineering & Consulting, Inc. Lab Job No.: PLM -01517 Project: Highland Square -Tenants' Space #1 Report Date: 11/16/2006 Project No: 6515 -06 -0452 Sample Date: 11 /1012006 Identification: Asbestos, Bulk Sample Analysis Test Method: Polarized Light Microscopy /Dispersion Staining (PLM /DS) EPA Method 600 /R- 931116 Page 4 of 8 On 11/13/2006, seventy -five (75) bulk samples were submitted by Ms. Carol Thoma of MACTEC Engineering & Consulting, Inc. for asbestos analysis by PLM/DS. Copies of the lab data sheets are attached; additional information may be found therein. The results are summarized below: Lab Client Sample Description/Location Asbestos Content Sample No. Field I.D. CL068858 33 Drywall / Joint Compound - South Addition - West Wall None Detected - Paint Texture None Detected - Joint Tape None Detected - Joint Compound None Detected - Paper None Detected - Wallboard Material CL068859 34 Drywall / Joint Compound - South Addition - South Wall None Detected - Paint Layer None Detected - Joint Compound None Detected - Paper . None Detected - Wallboard Material CL068860 35 Drywall / Joint Compound - South Addition - East Wall None Detected - Paint Layer None Detected - Joint Compound None Detected - Paper None Detected - Wallboard Material CL068861 36 Drywall / Joint Compound (old part) - Office Front None Detected - Paint Layer None Detected - Joint Compound None Detected - Paper None Detected - Wallboard Material CL068862 37 Drywall / Joint Compound (old part) - Office Hallway None Detected - Joint Tape None Detected - Joint Compound None Detected - Paper None Detected - Wallboard Material CLO69863 38 Drywall / Joint Compound (old part) - Meat Cooler None Detected - Paint Layer None Detected - Joint Compound None Detected - Paper None Detected - Wallboard Material CL068864 39 Drywall / Joint Compound (old part) - 2nd Floor None Detected - Joint Compound None Detected - Paper None Detected - Wallboard Material CLO68865 '''' ` ` 40 `Di w"_- Joint Comp6tind (old part) - above Seafood,• Back R6om ., : , None Detected. Famt Layer 2% C .,,, hryso,.trle Joutt Compound `!None Detected Paper IN Detected Wallboard Material These samples were analyzed by layers. The overall percent asbestos for the sample is reported when relevant The EPA considers a material to be asbestos containing only if it contains greater than one percent asbestos by Calibrated Visual Area Estimation (CVAE). EPA regulations also indicate that Regulated Asbestos Containing Materials (RACM) — materials that are friable or may become friable — be further analyzed by point counting when the results indicate less than ten percent asbestos by CVAE. CatesLab utilizes CVAE on a routine basis and does not include point counting unless specifically requested by the client The results may not be reproduced except in full. Ct .......... PLM REPORT SUMMARY Cates Laboratories NVLAP Lab No. 200569 -0 613 S. Bois D'Arc TDH License No. 30 -0287 Forney, Texas 75126 (972) 564 -4723 Client: MACTEC Engineering & Consulting, Inc. Lab Job No.: PLM -01517 Project: Highland Square - Tenants' Space 91 Report Date: 11/16/2006 Project No: 6515 -06 -0452 Sample Date: i 1 /10/2006 Identification: Asbestos, Bulk Sample Analysis Test Method: Polarized Light Microscopy /Dispersion Staining (PLM /DS) EPA Method 600 /R- 93/116 Page 5 of 8 On 11/1312006, seventy -frve (75) bulk samples were submitted by Ms. Carol Thoma ofMACTEC Engineering & Consulting, Inc. for asbestos analysis by PLM/DS. Copies of the lab data sheets are attached; additional information may be found therein. The results are summarized below: Lab Client Sample Description/Location Asbestos Content Sample No. Field I.D. CL068866 41 Drywall / Joint Compound, North Addition - Deli Soffit None Detected - Paint Layer None Detected - Joint Compound None Detected - Paper None Detected - WalIboard Material CL068867 42 Drywall / Joint Compound, North Addition - Magazine Area None Detected - Paint Layer None Detected - Joint Compound None Detected - Paper None Detected - Wallboard Material CL068868 43 Drywall / Joint Compound, North Addition - North Wall None Detected - Paint Layer None Detected - Joint Compound None Detected - Paper R_ None Detected - Wallboard Material CL068869 44 Drywall / Joint Compound, North Addition - East Soffit Wall None Detected - Paint Layer None Detected - Joint Compound None Detected - Paper None Detected - Wallboard Material CL068870 45 Drywall / Joint Compound, North Addition - Restcoom Foyer None Detected - Paint Layer None Detected - Joint Compound None Detected - Paper None Detected - Wallboard Material CL068871 46 HVAC Duct Work, New Insulation, Pink - South End, Stock Room None Detected - Wrap None Detected - Insulation CL068872 47 HVAC Duct Work, Old Insulation, Yellow " - Central, Stock Room None Detected - Wrap None Detected - Insulation CL068873 48 HVAC Duct Work, Old Insulation, Yellow - Stock Room None Detected - Wrap None Detected - Insulation CL068874 49 Ceramic Tile, 4" X 4" Tan - Deli None Detected - Ceramic Tile None Detected - Grout None Detected -Mortar These samples were analyzed by layers. The overall percent asbestos for the sample is reported when relevant. The EPA considers a material to be asbestos containing only if it contains greater than one percent asbestos by Calibrated Visual Area Estimation (CVAE). EPA regulations also indicate that Regulated Asbestos Containing Materials (RACM) — materials that are friable or may become friable — be further analyzed by point counting when the results indicate less than ten percent asbestos by CVAE. CatesLab utilizes CVAE on a routine basis and does not include point counting unless specifically requested by the client. The results may not be reproduced except in full. GT PLM REPORT SUMMARY Cates Laboratories NVLAP Lab No. 200569 -0 613 S. Bois D'Arc TDH License No. 30 -0287 Forney, Texas 75126 (972) 5644723 Client: MACTEC Engineering & Consulting, Inc. Lab lob No.: PLM -01517 Project: Highland Square -Tenants' Space #1 Report Date: 11/16/2006 Project No: 6515 -06-0452 Sample Date: 11/10/2006 Identification: Asbestos, Bulk Sample Analysis Test Method: Polarized Light Microscopy /Dispersion Staining (PLM /DS) EPA Method 600/R- 93/116 Page 6 of 8 On 11/13/2006, seventy-five (75) bulk samples were submitted by Ms. Carol Thoma of MACTEC Engineering & Consulting, Inc. for asbestos analysis by PLM/DS. Copies of the lab data sheets are attached; additional information may be found therein. The results are summarized below: Lab Client Sample Des cription/Location Asbestos Content Sample No. Field I.D. CL068875 50 Ceramic Tile, 4" X 4" Tan - Deli None Detected - Ceramic Tile None Detected - Grout None Detected - Mortar ;`CL068876 51 Floor.Tile 12" X 12" Beige w /Gray Streak - Stock Room 5 %Chrysokle Floor Ttle htysottle B1ackMastic. ,. CLO68877 52 Floor Tile, 12" X 12" Beige w /Gray Streak - Stock Room None Detected - Floor Tile None Detected - Black Mastic CL068878 53 TX T Gypsum Ceiling Panels - Stock Room, above Coolers None Detected CLO68879 54 2' X 4' Gypsum Ceiling Panels - Mezzanine Employee Break Room None Detected CL068880 55 Pipe Cover, Black Foam / Rubber and Glue - Meat Cooler None Detected - Insulation None Detected - Yellow Mastic CL068881 56 Pipe Cover, Black Foam / Rubber and Glue - Back Room, Pipe Chase None Detected - Insulation None Detected - Yellow Mastic CL068882 57 Tan Panels w /Glue - Men's Room None Detected - Wall Paneling None Detected - Yellow Mastic CL069883 58 TX 4' Ceiling Tile, Speckled - Men's Room None Detected CLO68984 59 TX 4' Ceiling Tile, Speckled - Men's Room None Detected CL068885 60 TX 4' Ceiling Tile, Fiber Glass / Plastic Skin / Cloth Texture - Restroom None Detected Foyer CL068886 61 TX 4' Ceiling Tile, Fiber Glass / Plastic Skin / Cloth Texture - Seafood None Detected Hallway CL068887 62 TX 4' Ceiling Tile, Fiber Glass / Plastic Skin / Knock -down Texture - None Detected Restroom Foyer CLO68888 63 TX 4' Ceiling Tile, Fiber Glass / Plastic Skin / Knock -down Texture - None Detected Produce Prep Area CL068889 64 TX 4' Ceiling Tile, Gypsum / Skin - Produce Prep Area None Detected These samples were analyzed by layers. The overall percent asbestos for the sample is reported when relevant. The EPA considers a material to be asbestos containing only if it contains greater than one percent asbestos by Calibrated Visual Area Estimation (CVAE). EPA regulations also indicate that Regulated Asbestos Containing Materials (RACM) — materials that are friable or may become friable — be further analyzed by point counting when the results indicate less than ten percent asbestos by CVAE. CatesLab utilizes CVAE on a routine basis and does not include point counting unless specifically requested by the client The results may not be reproduced except in full. �r PLM REPORT SUMMARY Cates Laboratories NVLAP Lab No. 200569 -0 613 S. Bois D'Arc TDH License No. 30 -0287 Forney, Texas 75126 (972) 564 -4723 Client: MACTEC Engineering & Consulting, Inc. Lab Job No.: PLM -01517 Project: Highland Square -Tenants' Space #1 Report Date: 11/16/2006 Project No: 6515 -06 -0452 Sample Date: 11110/2006 Identification: Asbestos, Bulk Sample Analysis Test Method: Polarized Light Microscopy /Dispersion Staining (PLM/DS) EPA Method 600 /R- 931116 Page 7 of 8 On 11/13/2006, seventy -five (75) bulk samples were submitted by Ms. Carol Thoma of MACTEC Engineering 8c Consulting, Inc. for asbestos analysis by PLM/DS. Copies of the lab data sheets are attached; additional information may be found therein. The results are summarized below: Lab Client Sample Description/Location Asbestos Content Sample No. Field I.D. CLO68890 65 TX 4' Ceiling Tile, Gypsum / Skin - Deli None Detected CL068891 66 4" X 4" Ceramic Tile - Exterior Front -South None Detected - Ceramic Tile None Detected - Grout CL068892 67 4" X 4" Ceramic Tile - Exterior Front -North None Detected - Ceramic Tile None Detected - Grout CL068893 68 Stucco - Exterior, Southwest None Detected CLO68894 69 Stucco - Exterior, Southwest None Detected CL068895 70 Stucco - Exterior, Central None Detected CL068896 7I Stucco - Exterior, Northwest None Detected CL068897 72 Stucco - Exterior, Northwest None Detected CLO68898 73 Stucco Ceiling, Sand Texture - Exterior, North Front Entrance None Detected CLO68899 74 Stucco Ceiling, Sand Texture - Exterior, North None Detected CL068900 75 Stucco Ceiling, Sand Texture - Exterior, South Front Entrance None Detected These samples were analyzed by layers. The overall percent asbestos for the sample is reported when relevant. The EPA considers a material to be asbestos containing only if it contains greater than one percent asbestos by Calibrated Visual Area Estimation (CVAE). EPA regulations also indicate that Regulated Asbestos Containing Materials (RACM) — materials that are friable or may become friable — be further analyzed by point counting when the results indicate less than ten percent asbestos by CVAE. CatesLab utilizes CVAE on a routine basis and does not include point counting unless specifically requested by the client The results may not be reproduced except in full. Ci PLM REPORT SUMMARY f Cates Laboratories NVLAP Lab No. 200569 -0 613 S. Bois D'Are TDH License No. 30 -0287 Forney, Texas 75126 (972) 5644723 Client: MACTEC Engineering & Consulting, Inc. Lab Job No.: PLM -01517 Project: Highland Square -Tenants' Space #1 Report Date: 11/16/2006 Project No: 6515 -06 -0452 Sample Date: 11/10/2006 Identification: Asbestos, Bulk Sample Analysis Test Method: Polarized Light Microscopy /Dispersion Staining (PLM /DS) EPA Method 60018- 931116 Page 8 of 8 On 1111342006, seventy-five(75) bulk samples were submitted by Ms. Carol Thoma ofMACTEC Engineering & Consulting, Inc. for asbestos analysis by FLU/DS. Copies of the lab data sheets are attached; additional information may be found therein. STATEMENT OF LABORATORY ACCREDITATION The samples were analyzed in general accordance with the procedures outlined in the Method for the Determination of Asbestos in Bulk Building Materials, EPA/600/R- 93/116 or the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency method, under AHERA, for the analysis of asbestos in building materials by polarized light microscopy. The results of each bulk sample relate only to the material tested and the results shall not be used to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any agency of the U.S. Government. Specific questions concerning bulk sample results shall be directed to the Laboratory Director. Analyst: Mark Turner Laboratory Director: John R. Cates, P.G Approved Signatory: Nv�a� CT PLM REPORT SUMMARY r Cates Laboratories NVLAP Lab No. 200569 -0 613 S. Bois D'Arc TDH License No. 30 -0287 Forney, Texas 75126 (972) 564 -4723 Client: MACTEC Engineering & Consulting, Inc. Lab Job No.: PLM - 01517 Project: Highland Square - Tenants' Space #1, Roofing Report Date: 11116/2006 Project No: 6515 -06 -0452 Sample Date: 11/10/2006 Identification: Asbestos, Bulk Sample Analysis Test Method: Polarized Light Microscopy /Dispersion Staining (PLM /DS) EPA Method 60O /R- 93/116 Page] of 4 On 11/13/2006, thirty -two (32) bulk samples were submitted by Mr. Karl Kologiski of MACTEC Engineering & Consulting, Inc- for asbestos analysis by PLM/DS. Copies of the lab data sheets are attached; additional information may be found therein. The results are summarized below: Lab Client Sample Description/Location Asbestos Content Sample No. Field I.D. CL069048 RRt Built -up Roofing, Membrane - Tenant Space #l, Southeast Corner None Detected - Roofing Membrane None Detected - Insulation CL069049 RR2 Built -up Roofing, Membrane - Tenant Space 41, Southwest Comer None Detected - Roofing Membrane None Detected - Insulation CL069050 RR3 Built -up Roofing, Membrane - Tenant Space #1, Northwest Comer None Detected - Roofing Membrane None Detected - Insulation CL069051 RR4 Built -up Roofing, Membrane - Tenant Space #l, Northeast Corner None Detected - Roofing Membrane None Detected - Insulation CL069052 RR5 Built -up Roofing, Membrane - Tenant Space # l; Center Roof None Detected - Roofing Membrane None Detected - Insulation CL069053 RR6 Built -up Roofing, Edge Flashing - Tenant Space #1, Northeast Corner None Detected - Roof Flashing CL069054 RR7 Built -up Roofing, Edge Flashing - Tenant Space #l, South Center Edge None Detected - Roof Flashing CL069055 RR8 Built -up Roofing, Edge Flashing - Tenant Space # 1, West Edge at Parapet None Detected - Roof Flashing Joint None Detected - Insulation CL069056 RR9 Built -up Roofing, Edge Flashing - Tenant Space 41, East Edge, Center None Detected - Roof Flashing CL069057 RRIO Parapet Wall Flashing -Tenant Space #1, Parapet Wall, South None Detected - Roof Flashing None Detected - Insulation CL069058 RRl 1 Parapet Wall Flashing - Tenant Space #l, Parapet Wall, North None Detected - Roof Flashing None Detected - Insulation CL069059 RR 12 Pitch Pan - Tenant Space #l, Northwest Comer Exhaust Fan None Detected - Roofing Mastic CL069060 RR13 Pitch Pan - Tenant Space #l, East Center, Package Unit None Detected - Roofing Mastic CL069061 kR14 Vent Hood Flashing Tenant Space #] East Center Vent Hood `5% Chrysotile Roofing Mastic 'r ` .,None Detected Roof lashing': fng Mastic CL069062 RR15 Vent Hood Flashing - Tenant Space #l; Southeast, Vent Bood None Detected - Silver Paint None Detected - Roof Flashing These samples were analyzed by layers. The overall percent asbestos for the sample is reported when relevant. The EPA considers a material to be asbestos containing only if it contains greater than one percent asbestos by Calibrated Visual Area Estimation (CVAE). EPA regulations also indicate that Regulated Asbestos Containing Materials (RACM) - materials that are friable or may become friable - be further analyzed by point counting when the results indicate less than ten percent asbestos by CVAE. CatesLab utilizes CVAE on a routine basis and does not include point counting unless specifically requested by the client. The results may not be reproduced except in full. 4T PLM REPORT SUMMARY Cates Laboratories NVLAP Lab No. 200569-0 613 S. Bois D'Arc TDH License No. 30 -0287 Forney, Texas 75126 (972) 564 -4723 Client: MACTEC Engineering & Consulting, Inc. Lab Job No.: PLM -01517 Project: Highland Square - Tenants' Space #1, Roofing Report Date: 11/16/2006 Project No: 6515 -06 -0452 Sample Date: 11/10/2006 Identification: Asbestos, Bulk Sample Analysis Test Method: Polarized Light Microscopy/Dispersion Staining (PLM /DS) EPA Method 600 1R- 931116 Page 2 of 4 On 11/1312006, thirty-two (32) bulk samples were submitted by Mr. Karl Kologiski of MACTEC Engineering & Consulting, Inc. for asbestos analysis by PLM/DS. Copies of the lab data sheets are attached; additional information may be found therein. The results are summarized below: Lab Client Sample Description/Location Asbestos Content Sample No. Field I.D. CL069063 RR16 Expansion Joint Material - Tenant Space #I, Southeast Roof, Joint None Detected CL069064 RR17 Expansion Joint Material - Tenant Space #1, Southwest Roof, Joint None Detected CL069065 RR18 Equipment Curb Flashing - Tenant Space # 1, Northwest Exhaust, Fan Curb None Detected - Roof Flashing CL069066 RRl 9 Equipment Curb Flashing - Tenant Space #I, East Center, HVAC Unit Curb None Detected - Roof Flashing None Detected - Insulation CL069067 RR20 Pitch Pan - Tenant Space #1, Gravel Roof HVAC Unit None Detected - Silver Paint None Detected - Roofing Mastic CL069068 RR21 Pitch Pan - Tenant Space # 1, Gravel Roof HVAC Unit None Detected - Silver Paint None Detected - Roofing Mastic GL069069 RR22 ' :.. Egtripinent Curb Flashing fen`ani Spa ee #1, Gravel Rool >Eichaust Uept :;None Detected Roof Flashing ;; ;5 %;Ctirysoti1 = :RoofingMastic CL069070 RR23 Equipment Curb Flashing - Tenant Space #1, Gravel Roof HVAC Unit None Detected - Silver Paint None Detected - Roof Flashing CL069071 RR24 Expansion Joint Material - Tenant Space 41, Gravel Roof, West Joint None Detected CL069072 RR25 Expansion Joint Material - Tenant Space #1, Gravel Roof, South Joint/ None Detected Wall CLO69073 RR26 Parapet Wall Flashing - Tenant Space #l, Gravel Roof, Southwest Parapet None Detected - Silver Paint None Detected - Roofing Mastic None Detected - Roof Flashing GL069074 -RR27 Parapet Wall flashing .':Tenant Spaoe#1oravel Roof Northwest l'a ;apet None Detected SilverPamt :: 5 %Chrysotile wAbb fng Mastic,. N..oneD.etectea-` 0:01 asking" CL069075 RR28 Built -up Roofing, Field - Gravel Roof; East Extension None Detected - Roofing Membrane None Detected - Insulation CL069076 RR29 Built -up Roofing, Field - Gravel Roof, North Side None Detected - Roofing Membrane None Detected - Insulation These samples were analyzed by layers. The overall percent asbestos for the sample is reported when relevant. The EPA considers a material to be asbestos containing only if it contains greater than one percent asbestos by Calibrated Visual Area Estimation (CVAE). EPA regulations also indicate that Regulated Asbestos Containing Materials (RACM) — materials that are friable or may become friable — be further analyzed by point counting when the results indicate less than ten percent asbestos by CVAE. Cateslab utilizes CVAE on a routine basis and does not include point counting unless specifically requested by the client. The results may not be reproduced except in full. a�T PLM REPORT SUMMARY Cates Laboratories NVLAP Lab No. 200569-0 613 S. Bois D'Arc TDH License No. 30 -0287 Forney, Texas 75126 (972) 564 -4723 Client: MACTEC Engineering & Consulting, Inc. Lab Job No.: PLM -01517 Project: Highland Square -Tenants' Space #1, Roofing Report Date: 11/16/2006 Project No: 6515 -06 -0452 Sample Date: 11/10/2006 Identification: Asbestos, Bulk Sample Analysis Test Method: Polarized Light Microscopy /Dispersion Staining (PLM /DS) EPA Method 600/R- 93/116 Page 3 of 4 On]]/] 3/2006, thirty-two (32) bulk samples were submitted by Mr. Karl Kologiski of MACTEC Engineering & Consulting, Inc. for asbestos analysis by PLM/DS. Copies of the lab data sheets are attached; additional information may be found therein. The results are summarized below: Lab Client Sample Description/Location Asbestos Content Sample No. Field I.D. CL069077 RR30 Built -up Roofing, Field - Gravel Roof. Northwest Corner None. Detected - Roofing Membrane None Detected - Insulation CL069078 RR31 Built -up Roofing, Edge Membrane - Gravel Roof Northwest Edge None Detected - Roofing Membrane CIQ69079 _RR32 •.'. Built=up Roo fing,EdgeMembraiie GravellZoof Southeast .Corner " None Detected. ILoofingMembrane None Detected .1V.. S eet ,5 %Chry'sohle Roo�ngMasttc These samples were analyzed by layers. The overall percent asbestos for the sample is reported when relevant. The EPA considers a material to be asbestos containing only if it contains greater than one percent asbestos by Calibrated Visual Area Estimation (CVAE). EPA regulations also indicate that Regulated Asbestos Containing Materials (RACM) - materials that are friable or may become friable - be further analyzed by point counting when the results indicate less than ten percent asbestos by CVAE. CatesLab utilizes CVAE on a routine basis and does not include point counting unless specifically requested by the client. The results may not be reproduced except in fill. 0_1r PLM REPORT SUMMARY Cates Laboratories NVLAP Lab No. 200569 -0 613 S. Bois D'Arc TDH License No. 30 -0287 i Fomey, Texas 75126 (972) 5644723 Client: MACTEC Engineering & Consulting, Inc. Lab Job No.: PLM -01517 Project: Highland Square - Tenants' Space #1, Roofing Report Date: 11/16/2006 Project No' 6515 - 06-0452 Sample Date: 11/10/2006 Identification: Asbestos, Bulk Sample Analysis Test Method: Polarized Light Microscopy/Dispersion Staining (PLM/DS) EPA Method 600/R- 93/116 Page 4 of 4 On 11913/2006, thirty -two (32) bulk samples were submitted by Mr. Karl Kologiski of MACTEC Engineering & Consulting, Inc. for asbestos analysis by PLM/DS. Copies of the lab data sheets are attached; additional information may be found therein. STATEMENT OF LABORATORY ACCREDITATION The samples were analyzed in general accordance with the procedures outlined in the Method for the Determination of Asbestos in Bulk Building Materials, EPA /600!12- 93/116 or the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency method, under AHERA, for the analysis of asbestos in building materials by polarized light microscopy. The results of each bulk sample relate only to the material tested and the results shall not be used to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any agency of the U.S. Government. Specific questions concerning bulk sample results shall be directed to the Laboratory Director. Analyst: John R. Cates Laboratory Director: John R. Cates, P.G. Approved Signatory: NV A a PLM REPORT SUMMARY - Cates Laboratories NVLAP Lab No. 200569 -0 r 613 S. Bois D Arc TDH License No. 30 -0287 L= Forney, Texas 75126 (972) 564 -4723 Client: MACTEC Engineering & Consulting, Inc. Lab Job No.: PLM -01517 Project: Highland Square = :Tenants "Space: #2:, Report Date: 11/12/2006 Project No: 6515 -06 -0452 Sample Date: 11/8/2006 Identification: Asbestos, Hulk Sample Analysis Test Method: Polarized Light Microscopy /Dispersion Staining (PLM /DS) EPA Method 600/R- 93/116 Pagel of4 On 11/9/2006, thirty -four (34) bulk samples were submitted by Mr. Charles Merrill of MACTEC Engineering & Consulting, Inc. for asbestos analysis by PLM/DS. Copies of the lab data sheets are attached; additional information may be found therein. The results are summarized below: Lab Client Sample Description/Location Asbestos Content Sample No. Field T.D. CL068713 1 Floor Tile, 12" X 12" Tan/Brown w/Mastic - #2, Main Floor 3% Chrysotile - Floor Tile 5% Chrysotile - Black Mastic CL068714 2 Floor Tile, 12" X 12" Tan/Brown w/Mastic - #2, Main Floor 3% Chrysotile - Floor Tile 5% Chrysotile - Black Mastic CL068715 3 Floor Tile, 12" X 12" Tan/Dark Brown: w/Mastic - #2, Main Floor Patches None Detected - Floor Tile 10% Chrysotile - Black Mastic CL068716 4 Floor Tile, 12" X 12" Tan/Dark Brown w/Mastic - #2, Main Floor Patches None Detected - Floor Tile 10% Chrysotile -Black Mastic CL068717 5 Floor Tile, 12" X I2" Blue w/Mastic - 42, Restrooms None Detected - Floor Tile None Detected - Yellow Mastic CLO68718 6 Floor Tile, 12" X I2" Blue w/Mastic - #2, Restroom . None Detected - Floor Tile None Detected - Yellow Mastic CL068719 7 Floor Tile, 12" X 12" Light Gray w/Mastic - #2, Snack Bar None Detected - Floor Tile None Detected - Yellow Mastic CL068720 8 Floor Tile, 12" X 12" Light Gray w/Mastic - #2, Snack Bar None Detected - Floor Tile None Detected - Yellow Mastic CL068721 9 Drywall / Joint Compound, Old - #2, Perimeter <1% Chrysotile - Paint Texture None Detected - Joint Tape <1% Chrysotile - Joint Compound None Detected - Paper CL068722 10 Drywall / Joint Compound, Old - 42, Perimeter <1% Chrysotile - Paint Texture None Detected - Joint Tape <1% Chrysotile - Joint Compound None Detected - Paper CL068723 11 Drywall / Joint Compound, New - #2, Back Room None Detected - Joint Tape None Detected - Joint Compound None Detected - Paper None Detected Wallboard Material These samples were analyzed by layers. The overall percent asbestos for the sample is reported when relevant. The EPA considers a material to be asbestos containing only if it contains greater than one percent asbestos by Calibrated Visual Area Estimation (CVAE). EPA regulations also indicate that Regulated Asbestos Containing Materials (RACM) — materials that are friable or may become friable — be further analyzed by point counting when the results indicate less than ten percent asbestos by CVAR CatesLab utilizes CVAE on a routine basis and does not include point counting unless specifically requested by the client The results may not be reproduced except in full. all PLM REPORT SUMMARY Cates Laboratories NVLAP Lab No. 200569 -0 613 S. Bois D'Arc TDH License No. 30 -0287 Forney, Texas 75126 (972) 5644723 Client: MACTEC Engineering & Consulting. Inc. Lab Job No.: PLM -01517 Project: Highland Square -Tenants' Space #2 Report Date: 11/12/2006 Project No: 6515 -06 -0452 Sample Date: 11/8/2006 Identification: Asbestos, Bulk Sample Analysis Test Method: Polarized Light Microscopy /Dispersion Staining (PLM/DS) EPA Method 600 /R- 93/116 Page 2 of On 11/9/2006, thirty-four (34) bulk samples were submitted by Mr. Charles Merrill of MACTEC Engineering & Consulting, Inc, for asbestos analysis by PLM/DS. Copies of the lab data sheets are attached; additional information may be found therein. The results are summarized below: Lab Client Sample Description/Location Asbestos Content Sample No. Field I.D. CLO68724 12 Drywall / Joint Compound, New - #2, Back Room None Detected - Joint Tape None Detected - Joint Compound None Detected - Paper None Detected - Wallboard Material CL068725 13 Wall Panels w/Tan Mastic - #2; Perimeter None Detected - Tan Mastic CL068726 14 Wall Panels w /Gray & Tan Mastic - #2, Perimeter None Detected - Tan Mastic 5% Chrysotile - Gray Mastic CL068727 15 Carpet, Tan w/Mastic - Platform in Front Room None Detected - Carpet None Detected - Yellow Mastic CL068728 16 Carpet, Tan w/Mastic - Platform in Front Room None Detected - Carpet None Detected - Yellow Mastic CL068729 17 Baseboard, Black 4" None Detected CL068730 18 Baseboard, Black 4" None Detected CL068731 19 Mirror Mastic - #2, Rear Room Soffit Not Submitted ., CL068732 20 Mirror Mastic - #2, Rear Room Soffit Not Submitted CL068733 21 Stair Treads - #2, Corner Office None Detected - Stair Tread None Detected - Yellow Mastic CL068734 22 Stair Treads - #2, Comer Office None Detected - Stair Tread None Detected - Yellow Mastic CL068735 23 Floor Tile, 12" X 12" Tan, Mottled w/Mastic - #2, Front (patch) None Detected - Floor Tile 5% Chrysotile - Black Mastic CL068736 24 Floor Tile, 12" X 12" Tan, Mottled w/Mastic - #2, Front (patch) None Detected - Floor Tile 5% Chrysotile - Black Mastic CLO68737 25 Caulking, Window Frames - #2, Front None Detected CL068738 26 Caulking, Window Frames - #2, Front None Detected CL 068739 27 Texture on Columns - #2, Front None Detected These samples were analyzed by layers. The overall percent asbestos for the sample is reported when relevant The EPA considers a material to be asbestos containing only if it contains greater than one percent asbestos by Calibrated Visual Area Estimation (CVAE). EPA regulations also indicate that Regulated Asbestos Containing Materials (RACM) — materials that are friable or may become friable — be further analyzed by point counting when the results indicate less than ten percent asbestos by CVAE. CatesLab utilizes CVAE on a routine basis and does not include point counting unless specifically requested by the client The results may not be reproduced except in full. 0 PLM REPORT SUMMARY Cates Laboratories NVLAP Lab N o.200569-0 613 S. Bois D'Arc TDH License No. 30 -0287 Fomey, Texas 75126 (972) 564 -4723 Client: MACTEC Engineering & Consulting, Inc. Lab Job No.: PLM -01517 Project: Highland Square - Tenants' Space #2 Report Date: 11/12/2006 Project No: 6515 -06 -0452 Sample Date: 11/8/2006 Identification: Asbestos, Bulk Sample Analysis Test Method: Polarized Light Microscopy /Dispersion Staining (PLM /DS) EPA Method 600/R- 93/116 Page 3 of On 11/9/2006, thirty -four (34) bulk samples were submitted by Mr. Charles Merrill of MACTEC Engineering & Consulting, Inc. for asbestos analysis by PLM/DS. Copies of the lab data sheets are attached, additional information may be found therein. The results are summarized below: Lab Client Sample Description/Location Asbestos Content Sample No. Field I.D. CL068740 28 Texture on Columns - #2, Front None Detected , CL068741 29 Texture on Columns - #2, Front None Detected CL068742 30 Stucco, Sand Texture None Detected CL068743 31 Stucco, Sand Texture None Detected CL068744 32 Stucco, Sand Texture None Detected CL068745 .33 Ceramic Tile, Tan 4" Square, Grout, Adhesive - #2, Front None Detected - Ceramic Tile None Detected - Grout <1% Chrysotiie - White Adhesive None Detected - Grey Bedding CL068746 34 Ceramic Tile, Tan 4" Square; Grout, Adhesive - #2, Front None Detected - Ceramic Tile None Detected - Grout <1% Chrysotile - White Adhesive None Detected - Grey Bedding These samples were analyzed by layers. The overall percent asbestos for the sample is reported when relevant. The EPA considers a material to be asbestos containing only if it contains greater than one percent asbestos by Calibrated Visual Area Estimation (CVAE). EPA regulations also indicate that Regulated Asbestos Containing Materials (RACM) — materials that are friable or may become friable — be further analyzed by point counting when the results indicate less than ben percent asbestos by CVAE. CatesLab utilizes CVAE on a routine basis and does not include point counting unless specifically requested by the client.. The results may not be reproduced except in full. CT PLM REPORT SUMMARY Cates Laboratories NVLAP Lab No. 200569 -0 613 S. Bois D'Arc TDH License No. 30 -0287 Z� Forney, Texas 75126 (972) 564 -4723 Client: MACTEC Engineering & Consulting, Inc. Lab JobNo.: PLM -01517 Project: Highland Square -Tenants' Space #2 Report Date: 11/12/2006 Project No: 6515 -06 -0452 Sample Date: 11 /812006 Identification: Asbestos, Bulk Sample Analysis Test Method: Polarized Light Microscopy /Dispersion Staining (PLM /DS) EPA Method 600 /R- 93/116 Page 4 of On 11/9/2006, thirty-four (34) bulk samples were submitted by Mr. Charles Merrill of MACTEC Engineering & Consulting, Inc. for asbestos analysis by PLM/DS. Copies of the lab data sheets are attached; additional information may be found therein. STATEMENT OF LABORATORY ACCREDITATION The samples were analyzed in general accordance with the procedures outlined, in the Method for the Determination of Asbestos in Bulk Building Materials, EPA/600/R- 93/116 or the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency method, under AHERA, for the analysis of asbestos in building materials by polarized light microscopy. The results of each bulk sample relate only to the material tested and the results shall not be used to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any agency of the U.S. Government. Specific questions concerning bulk sample results shall be directed to the Laboratory Director. Analyst: John R. Cates Laboratory Director: John R. Cates, P.G. .. Approved Signatory: CT ....... ... _ . .....- .... .......................... PLM REPORT SUMMARY Cates Laboratories NVLAP Lab No. 200569 -0 613 S. Bois D'Arc TDH License No. 30 -0287 Forney, Texas 75126 (972) 564 -4723 Client: MACTEC Engineering & Consulting, Inc. Lab Job No.: PLM -01517 Project: Highland Square -Tenants' Space #2 Report Date: 11/16/2006 Project No: 6515 -06 -0452 Sample Date: 11/13/2006 Identification: Asbestos, Bulk Sample Analysis Test Method: Polarized Light Microscopy /Dispersion Staining (PLM/DS) EPA Method 600/R- 93/116 Page 1 of On 11/14/2006, fifteen (15) bulk samples were submitted by Ms. Carol Thoma of MACTEC Engineering & Consulting, Inc. for asbestos analysis by PLM/DS. Copies of the lab data sheets are attached; additional information may be found therein. The results are summarized below: Lab Client Sample Description/Location Asbestos Content Sample No. Field I.D. CL069018 34 Ceiling Tile, T X 4' Fiberglass / Plastic Skin - Tenant #2, Main Floor None Detected CL069019 35 Ceiling Tile, T X 4' Fiberglass / Plastic Skin - Tenant #2, Main Floor None Detected CL069020 36 Ceiling Tile, TX 4' Leather Texture - Tenant #2, Main Floor None Detected CLO69021 37 Ceiling Tile, 2' X 4' Leather Texture - Tenant #2, Main Floor None Detected CL069022 38 Ceiling Tile, 2' X 4' Divot / Pinhole - Tenant #2, Main Floor None Detected CL069023 39 Ceiling Tile, TX 4' Divot / Pinhole - Tenant #2, Main Floor None Detected CL069024 40 Ceiling Tile, TX 4' Smooth -Tenant #2, Main Floor None Detected CL069025 41 Ceiling Tile, TX 4' Smooth - Tenant #2, Main Floor None Detected CLO69026 42 Ceiling Tile, TX 4' Pinhole / Knobby Texture - Tenant #2, Main Floor None Detected CL069027 43 Ceiling Tile, TX 4' Pinhole / Knobby Texture - Tenant #2, Main Floor None Detected CL069028 44 Mirror Mastic - Tenant 42, Back Wall 20% Chtsotile CL069029 45 Mirror Mastic - Tenant #2, Back Wall 20% Chrysotile CL069030 46 Stucco Ceiling - Exterior Walkway None Detected CL069031 47 Stucco Ceiling - Exterior Walkway None Detected CL 069032 48 Stucco Ceiling - Exterior Walkway None Detected These samples were analyzed by layers. The overall percent asbestos for the sample is reported when relevant. The EPA considers a material to be asbestos containing only if it contains greater than one percent asbestos by Calibrated Visual Area Estimation (CVAE). EPA regulations also indicate that Regulated Asbestos Containing Materials (RACM) — materials that are friable or may become friable — be further analyzed by point counting when the results indicate Iess than ten percent asbestos by CVAE. CatesLab utilizes CVAE on a routine basis and does not include point counting unless specifically requested by the client. The results may not be reproduced except in full. CT _.:..:....___. - ... _ ....... .._ v..... PLM REPORT SUMMARY f Cates Laboratories NVLAP Lab No. 200569 -0 613 S. Bois D'Arc TDH License No. 30 -0287 Forney, Texas 75126 (972 )564 -4723 Client: MACTEC Engineering & Consulting, Inc. Lab Job No.: PLM -01517 Project: Highland Square -Tenants' Space #2 Report Date: 11/16/2006 Project No: 6515 -06 -0452 Sample Date: 11/13/2006 Identification: Asbestos, Bulk Sample Analysis Test Method: Polarized Light Microscopy /Dispersion Staining (PLM /DS) EPA Method 600 /R- 93/116 Page 2 of 2 On 11/14/1006, fifteen (15) bulk samples were submitted by Ms. Carol Tho na of MACTEC Engineering & Consulting, Inc. for asbestos analysis by PLM/DS. Copies of the lab data sheets are attached; additional information may be found therein. STATEMENT OF LABORATORY ACCREDITATION The samples were analyzed in general accordance with the procedures outlined in the Method for the Determination of Asbestos. in Bulk Building Materials, EPA/600/R-9 3/116 or the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency method, under AHERA, for the analysis of asbestos in building materials by polarized light microscopy. The results of each bulk sample relate only to the material tested and the results shall not be used to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any agency of the U.S. Government. Specific questions concerning bulk sample results shall be directed to the Laboratory Director. Analyst: John R. Cates Laboratory Director: John R. Cates, P.G. Approved Signatory: MME 0-1 PLM REPORT SUMMARY r ° Cates Laboratories NVLAP Lab No. 200569 -0 / 613 S. Bois D'Arc TDH License No. 30-0287 - Fomey, Texas 75126 (972) 564-0723 Client: MACTEC Engineering & Consulting, Inc. Lab Job No.: PLM -01517 Project: Highland Square.- :;i`eriarits' Space #5• Report Date: 11/12/2006 Project No: 6515 -06 -0452 Sample Date: 11/8/2006 Identification: Asbestos, Sulk Sample Analysis Test Method: Polarized Light Microscopy /Dispersion Staining (PLILUDS) EPA Method 600 /R- 93/116 Page 1 of On l 1/9/2006, thirty -eight (38) bulk samples were submitted by Mr. Charles Merrill ofMACTEC Engineering & Consulting, Inc, for asbestos analysis by PLM/DS. Copies of the lab data sheets are attached; additional information may be found therein. The results are summarized below: Lab Client Sample Description/Location Asbestos Content Sample No. Field I.D. CLO68747 1 Drywall ! Joint Compound - #5, New Restroom, Wall None Detected - Paint Texture None Detected - Joint Tape None Detected - Joint Compound None Detected - Paper None Detected - Wallboard Material CL068748 2 Drywall / Joint Compound - #5, New Restroom, Wall None Detected - Paint Texture None Detected - Joint Tape None Detected - Joint Compound None Detected - Paper None Detected - Wallboard Material CLO68749 3 Texture on Column - #5, Exterior Column None Detected CLO68750 4 Texture on Column - #5, Exterior Column None Detected CLO68751 5 Texture on Column - #5, Exterior Column None Detected CLO68752 6 Drywall / Joint Compound, Old (under front window) - #5, Interior None Detected - Paint Layer <1% Chrysotile - Joint Compound None Detected - Paper None Detected - Wallboard Material CL068753 7 Drywall / Joint Compound, OId (trader front window) - #5, hiterior None Detected - Paint Layer <1% Chrysotile - Joint Compound None Detected - Paper None Detected - Wallboard Material CL068754 8 Drywall / Joint Compound, w /Stippled Texture (perimeter) - #5, Interior None Detected - Paint Texture None Detected - Joint Compound None Detected - Paper None Detected - Wallboard Material CL068755 9 Drywall /Joint Compound, w /Stippled Texture (perimeter) - #5, Interior None Detected - Paint Texture None Detected - Joint Compound None Detected - Paper None Detected - Wallboard Material These samples were analyzed by layers. The overall percent asbestos for the sample is reported when relevant. The EPA considers a material to be asbestos containing only if it contains greater than one percent asbestos by Calibrated Visual Area Estimation (CVAE). EPA regulations also indicate that Regulated Asbestos Containing Materials (RACM) — materials that are friable or may become friable — be further analyzed by point counting when the results indicate less than ten percent asbestos by CVAE. CatesLab utilizes CVAE on a routine basis and does not include point counting unless specifically requested by the client. The results may not be reproduced except in full. GT PLM REPORT SUMMARY Cates Laboratories NVLAP Lab No. 200569 -0 613 S. Bois D'Are TDH License No. 30 -0287 X Forney, Texas 75126 (972) 564 -4723 Client: MACTEC Engineering & Consulting, Inc. Lab Job No.: PLM -01517 Project: Highland Square = Tenants' Space #5 Report Date: 11/12/2006 Project No: 6515 -06 -0452 Sample Date: 11 /8/2006 Identification: Asbestos, Bulk Sample Analysis Test Method: Polarized Light Microscopy /Dispersion Staining (PLM /DS) EPA Method 600 /R- 93/116 Page 2 of 5 on 1119/2Q06, thirty -eight (38) bulk samples were submitted by Mr. Charles Merrill of MACTEC Engineering & Consulting, Inc. for asbestos analysis by PLM/DS. Copies of the lab data sheets are attached; additional information may be found therein. The results are summarized below: Lab Client Sample Description/Location Asbestos Content Sample No. Field I.D. CL068756 10 Drywall / Joint Compound, w /Stippled Texture (perimeter) - #5, Interior None Detected - Paint Texture None Detected - Joint Compound None Detected - Paper None Detected - Wallboard Material CL068757 11 Drywall / Joint Compound, w /Stippled Texture (nursery partition / office None Detected - Paint Texture partition) - #5, Interior None Detected - Joint Tape None Detected - Joint Compound None Detected - Paper None Detected - Wallboard Material CLO68758 12 Drywall / Joint Compound, w /Stippled Texture (nursery partition / office None Detected - Paint Texture partition) - #5, Interior None Detected - Joint Compound None Detected - Paper None Detected - Wallboard Material CL068759 13 Drywall / Joint Compound, w /Stippled Texture (nursery partition / office None Detected - Paint Texture partition) - #5, Interior None Detected - Joint Compound None Detected - Paper None Detected - Wallboard Material CL068760 14 Drywall / Joint Compound, w /Stippled Texture (perimeter) - #5, Interior None Detected - Paint Texture None Detected - Joint Compound None Detected - Paper None Detected - Wallboard Material CL068761 15 Drywall / Joint Compound, w /Stippled Texture (perimeter) - #5, Interior None Detected - Paint Texture None Detected - Joint Compound None Detected - Paper None Detected - Wallboard Material CL068762 16 Not Used Not Used CL068763 17 Not Used Not Used CLO68764 18 Drywall / Joint Compound (new conference room / new partition) - #5, None Detected - Paint Texture Interior None Detected - Joint Compound None Detected - Paper None Detected - Wallboard Material These samples were analyzed by layers. The overall percent asbestos for the sample is reported when relevant. The EPA considers a material to be asbestos containing only if it contains greater than one percent asbestos by Calibrated Visual Area Estimation (CVAE). EPA regulations also indicate that Regulated Asbestos Containing Materials (RACM) — materials that are friable or may become friable — be further analyzed by point counting when the results indicate less than ten percent asbestos by CVAE. CatesLab utilizes CVAE on a routine basis and does not include point counting unless specifically requested by the client. The results may not be reproduced except in full. CIT. PLM REPORT SUMMARY Cates Laboratories NVLAP Lab No. 200569 -0 613 S. Bois D'Arc TDH License No. 30 -0287 = : Forney, Texas 75126 (972) 564A723 Client: MACTEC Engineering & Consulting, Inc. Lab Job No.: PLM -01517 Project: Highland Square - Tenants' Space #5 Report Date: 11/12/2006 Project No: 6515 -06 -0452 Sample Date: 1118/2006 Identification: Asbestos, Bulk Sample Analysis Test Method: Polarized Light Microscopy /Dispersion Staining (PLM/DS) EPA Method 600 /R- 93/116 Page 3 of 5 On 11/9/2006, thirty -eight (38) bulk samples were submitted by Mr. Charles Merrill of MACTEC Engineering & Consulting, Inc. for asbestos analysis by PLM/DS. Copies of the lab data sheets are attached; additional information may be found therein, The results are summarized below: Lab Client Sample Description/Location Asbestos Content Sample No. Field I.D. CL068765 19 Drywall / Joint Compound (new conference room / new partition) - #5, None Detected - Paint Layer Interior None Detected - Paper. None Detected - Wallboard Material CL068766 20 Floor Tile, 12" X 12" Tan w/Light Brown Streaks w/Mastic - #5, Interior None Detected - Floor Tile 5% Chrysotile - Black Mastic CL069767 21 Floor Tile, 12" X 12" Tan w/Light Brown Streaks w/Mastic - #5, Interior None Detected - Floor Tile 5% Chrysotile - Black Mastic CL068768 22 Floor Tile, 12" X 12" Tan w/Mottled w/Mastic - #5, Interior 5% Cbrysotile - Floor Tile 10% Chrysotile - Black Mastic CL068769 23 Floor Tile, 12" X 12" Tan w/Mottled w/Mastic - #5, Interior 5% Chrysotile - Floor Tile 10% Chrysotile - Black Mastic CL068770 24 Carpet, Purple / Floor Tile w/Mastic (2nd layer) - Front Reception None Detected - Carpet None Detected - Yellow Mastic 5% Chrysotile - Floor Tile 10% Chrysotile - Black Mastic CL068771 25 Carpet, Purple - Rear Platform None Detected - Carpet CL068772 26 Floor Tile, 12" X 12" Pink w/Mastio - #5, Interior None Detected - Floor Tile None Detected - Yellow Mastic 10% Chrysotile - Black Mastic CL068773 27 Baseboard, Gray 4" w/Mastie - #5, Interior None Detected CLO68774 28 Baseboard, Gray 4" w /Mastic - #5, Interior None Detected CL068775 29 Baseboard, Black 4" w /Mastic - #5, Interior None Detected CL068776 30 Baseboard, Black 4" w/Mastic - #5, Interior None Detected CL068777 31 Carpet, Green / Floor Tile w/Mastic (2nd layer) - Nursery None Detected - Carpet 5% Chrysotile - Floor Tile 10% Chrysotile - Black Mastic These samples were analyzed by layers. The overall percent asbestos for the sample is reported when relevant. The EPA considers a material to be asbestos containing only if it contains greater than one percent asbestos by Calibrated Visual Area Estimation (CVAE). EPA regulations also indicate that Regulated Asbestos Containing Materials (RACM) — materials that are friable or may become friable — be further analyzed by point counting when the results indicate less than ten percent asbestos by CVAE. CatesLab utilizes CVAE on a routine basis and does not include point counting unless specifically requested by the client. The results may not be reproduced except in full. C1 PLM REPORT SUMMARY Af. Cates Laboratories NVLAP Lab No. 200569 -0 613 S. Bois D'Arc TDH License No. 30 -0287 jF :. Forney, Texas 75126 (972) 56414723 Client: MACTEC Engineering & Consulting, Inc. Lab Job No.: PLM -01517 Project: Highland Square -Tenants' Space #5 Report Date: 11/12/2006 Project No: 6515 -06 -0452 Sample Date: 11/8/2006 Identification: Asbestos, Bulk Sample Analysis Test Method: Polarized Light Microscopy /Dispersion Staining (PLM /DS) EPA Method 6001R- 931116 Page 4 of 5 On 11/9/2006, thirty -eight (38) bulk samples were submitted by Mr. Charles Merrill of MACTEC Engineering & Consulting, Inc. for asbestos analysis by PLM/D5. Copies of the lab data sheets are attached; additional information may be found therein. The results are summarized below: Lab Client Sample Description/Location Asbestos Content Sample No. Field I.D. CLO68778 32 Carpet, Green / Floor Tile w/Mastic (2nd layer) - Nursery None Detected - Carpet 5% Chrysotile - Floor Tile 10% Chrysotile - Black Mastic CL069779 33 Drywall / Joint Compound - 45, Interior, New Restroom Ceiling None Detected - Paint Texture None Detected -Joint Tape None Detected - Joint Compound None Detected - Paper None Detected - Wallboard Material CL068780 34 Drywall / Joint Compound - #5, Interior, New Restroom Ceiling None Detected - Paint Texture None Detected - Joint Tape None Detected - Joint Compound None Detected - Paper None Detected - Wallboard Material CL068781 35 Caulk on Window Frames - 45, Front None Detected CL068782 36 Caulk on Window Frames - #5, Front None Detected CL068783 37 Ceramic Tile, White - #5, Window Ledge None Detected - Ceramic Tile None Detected - Grout <1% Chrysotile - White Adhesive None Detected - Grey Bedding CL068784 38 Ceramic Tile, White - #5, Window Ledge None Detected - Ceramic Tile None Detected - Grout <1% Chrysotile - White Adhesive None Detected - Grey Bedding These samples were analyzed by layers. The overall percent asbestos for the sample is reported when relevant. The EPA considers a material to be asbestos containing only if it contains greater than one percent asbestos by Calibrated Visual Area Estimation (CVAE). EPA regulations also indicate that Regulated Asbestos Containing Materials (RACM) — materials that are friable or may become friable — be further analyzed by point counting when the results indicate less than ten percent asbestos by CVAE. CatesLab utilizes CVAE on a routine basis and does not include point counting unless specifically requested by the client. The results may not be reproduced except in full. ::...:._.__. q.:....:.. _....._..... - .......... PLM REPORT SUMMARY `' ,: Cates Laboratories NVLAP Lab No. 200569-0 V : 613 S. Bois D'Are TDH License No. 30-0287 Forney, Texas 75126 (972) 5644723 Client: MACTEC Engineering & Consulting, Inc. Lab JobNo.: PLM -01517 Project: Highland Square Tenants' Space #5 Report Date: 11/12/2006 Project No: 6515 -06 -0452 Sample Date: 11/8/2006 Identification: Asbestos, Bulk Sample Analysis Test Method: Polarized Light Microscopy /Dispersion Staining (PLM/DS) EPA Method 600 /R- 93/116 Page 5 of 5 on 11/9/2006, thirty -eight (38) bulk samples were submitted by Mr. Charles Merrill of MACTEC Engineering & Consulting, Inc. for asbestos analysis by PLM/DS. Copies of the lab data sheets are attached; additional information may be found therein. STATEMENT OF LABORATORY ACCREDITATION The samples were analyzed in general accordance with the procedures outlined in the Method for the Determination of Asbestos in Bulk Building Materials, EPA/600/R-93/116 or the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency method, under AHERA, for the analysis of asbestos in building materials by polarized light microscopy. The results of each bulk sample relate only to the material tested and the results shall not be used to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any agency of the U.S. Government. Specific questions concerning bulk sample results shall be directed to the Laboratory Director. Analyst: John R. Cates Laboratory Director: John R. Cates, P.G. ... . zs Approved Signatory: Elm CST PLM REPORT SUMMARY Cates Laboratories NVLAP Lab No. 200569 -0 613 S. Bois D'Arc TDH License No. 30 -0287 Forney, Texas 75126 (972) 5644723 Client: MACTEC Engineering & Consulting, Inc. Lab Job No.: PLM -01517 Project: Highland Square -Tenants' Space #5 Report Date: 11116/2006 Project No: 6515 -06 -0452 Sample Date: 11 /13/2006 Identification: Asbestos, Bulk Sample Analysis Test Method: Polarized Light Microscopy /Dispersion Staining (PLM /DS) EPA Method 600 /R- 93/116 Page I of 2 On 11/14/2006, fifteen (15) bulk samples were submitted by Ms. Carol Thoma of MACTEC Engineering & Consulting, Inc. for asbestos analysis by PLM/DS. Copies of the lab data sheets are attached; additional information may be found therein. The results are summarized below: Lab Client Sample Description/Location Asbestos Content Sample No. Field I.D. CL069633 39 Ceiling Tile, T X 4' Knock -down Texture - Tenant #5, Main Floor None Detected CL069034 40 Ceiling Tile, 2' X 4' Knock -down Texture - Tenant #5, Main Floor None Detected CL069035 41 Ceiling Tile, T X 4' Smooth - Tenant #5, Main Floor None Detected CL069036 42 Ceiling Tile, TX 4' Smooth - Tenant #5, Main Floor None Detected CLO69037 43 Ceiling Tile, TX 4' Wormhole - Tenant #5, Main Floor None Detected CL069038 44 Ceiling Tile, TX 4' Wormhole - Tenant #5, Main Floor None Detected CL069039 45 Ceiling Tile, TX 4' Speckled - Tenant #5, Main Floor None Detected CLO69040 46 Ceiling Tile, 2' X 4' Speckled - Tenant #5, Main Floor None Detected CL069041 47 Ceiling Tile, TX 4' Stippled - Tenant #5, Office None Detected CLO69042 48 Ceiling Tile, TX 4' Stippled -Tenant #5, Office None Detected CL069043 49 Drywall / Joint Compound, Ceiling - Restroom Ceiling None Detected - Paint Texture None Detected - Joint Tape None Detected - Joint Compound None Detected - Paper None Detected - Wallboard Material CL069044 50 Drywall / Joint Compound, Ceiling - Restroom Ceiling None Detected - Paint Texture None Detected - Joint Tape None Detected - Joint Compound None Detected - Paper None Detected - Wallboard Material CL069045 51 Stucco - Exterior Walkway Ceiling None Detected CLO69046 52 Stucco - Exterior Walkway Ceiling None Detected CL069047 53 Stucco - Exterior Walkway Ceiling None Detected These samples were analyzed by layers. The overall percent asbestos for the sample is reported when relevant The EPA considers a material to be asbestos containing only if it contains greater than one percent asbestos by Calibrated Visual Area Estimation (CVAE). EPA regulations also indicate that Regulated Asbestos Containing Materials (RACK _ materials that are friable or may become friable — be further analyzed by point counting when the results indicate less than ten percent asbestos by CVAE. CatesLab utilizes CVAE on a routine basis and does not include point counting unless specifically requested by the client. The results may not be reproduced except in full. CT .... .... ... :..:.._._.: ... ........ ... _ ::.............. ........ _ ........ _ ........................_. _........... PLM REPORT SUMMARY Cates Laboratories NVLAP Lab No. 200569 -0 613 S. Bois D'Arc TDH License No. 30-0287 I• Fomey, Texas 75126 (972) 564 -4723 Client: MACTEC Engineering & Consulting, Inc. Lab Job No.: PLM -01517 Project: Highland Square -Tenants' Space #5 Report Date: 1111612006 Project No: 6515 -06 -0452 Sample Date: 11/13/2006 Identification: Asbestos, Bulk Sample Analysis Test Method: Polarized Light Microscopy /Dispersion Staining (PLM /DS) EPA Method 600 /R- 93/116. Page 2 of 2 On 11/14/2006, fifteen (15) bulk samples were submitted by Ms. Carat Thoma of MACTEC Engineering & Consulting, Inc, for asbestos analysis by PLM/D5. Copies of the lab data sheets are attached, additional information maybe found therein. STATEMENT OF LABORATORY ACCREDITATION The samples were analyzed in general accordance .with the procedures- outlined in the Method for the Determination of Asbestos in Bulk Building Materials, EPA /600/R- 93/116 or the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency method, under AHERA, for the analysis of asbestos in building materials by polarized light microscopy. The results of each bulk sample relate only to the material tested and the results shall not be used to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any agency of the U.S. Government. Specific questions concerning bulk sample results shall be directed to the Laboratory Director. Analyst: John R. Cates Laboratory Director: John R. Cates, P.G. Approved Signatory: Nv�a� GT PLM REPORT SUMMARY Cates Laboratories NVLAP Lab No. 200569 -0 6I3 S. Bois D'Are TDH License No. 30 -0287 'C ! Forney, Texas 75126 (972) 564 -4723 Client: MACTEC Engineering & Consulting, Inc. Lab lob No.: PLM -01517 Project: Highland Square - Tenants' Space #2 & #5, Roofing Report Date: 11/16/2006 Project No: 6515 -06 -0452 Sample Date: 11/10/2006 Identification: Asbestos, Bulk.Sample Analysis Test Method: Polarized Light Microscopy /Dispersion Staining (PLM /DS) EPA Method 600 /R- 93/116 Page I of 3 On 11/13/2006, twenty (20) bulk samples were submitted by Mr. Karl Kologiski ofMACTEC Engineering & Consulting, Inc. for asbestos analysis by PLM/DS. Copies of the lab data sheets are attached; additional information may be found therein. The results are summarized below. Lab Client Sample Description/Location Asbestos Content Sample No. Field I.D. CL069090 RF -I Built -up Roofing, Membrane - Tenant Space 42, Center Roof None Detected - Roofing Membrane None Detected - Insulation CL069081 RF -2 Built -up Roofing, Membrane - Tenant Space #2, Southwest Corner None Detected - Roofing Membrane None Detected - Insulation CL069082 RF -3 Built -up Roofing, Membrane - Tenant Space #5, Northeast Corner None Detected - Roofing Membrane None Detected - Insulation CL069083 RF-4 Built -up Roofing, Membrane - Tenant Space #5, West Center None Detected - Roofmg Membrane None Detected - Insulation CL069084 RF -5 Built -up Roofing, Edge Flashing - Tenant Space #2, Northeast Corner Edge None Detected - Roof Flashing CL069085 RF -6 Built-up Roofin g, Edge Flashing Tenant Space #2 South Center Edg e None Detected - Roof Flashing None Detected - Insulation CLO69086 RF -7 Built -up Roofing, Edge Flashing - Tenant Space #5, North Center Edge None Detected - Roof Flashing None Detected - Insulation CL069087 RF -8 Built- up.Roofing, Edge Flashing - Tenant Space #5, South Center Edge None Detected - Roof Flashing None Detected - Insulation CLOb9088 ,:RF -9 w Prtch Pan . Tenant Space it2,` Center 7dVAC Unit ' c'= h0%.CFvysottI = .Roofing'Masnc - - CL069089 RF -10 Pitch Pan - Tenant Space #5, East HVAC Unit None Detected - Roofing Mastic CL069Q90 RF 11 „ ' Prtch:Pan Tenant Space. #5, West HVAC Unit' 10% Chrysoale ;Roofing Ivlasttc CLO69091 RF -12 Equipment Curb Flashing - Tenant Space #2, East Center HVAC Unit None Detected - Roof Flashing None Detected - Insulation CL069092 RF -13 Equipment Curb Flashing - Tenant Space #2, West HVAC Unit None Detected - Roof Flashing None Detected - Insulation CL069093 RF -14 Equipment Curb Flashing - Tenant Space #5, East HVAC Unit None Detected - Roof Flashing None Detected - Insulation CL069094 RF -15 Equipment Curb Flashing - Tenant Space #5, Southeast HVAC Unit None Detected - Roof Flashing None Detected - insulation These samples were analyzed by layers. The overall percent asbestos for the sample is reported when relevant. The EPA considers a material to be asbestos containing only if it contains greater than one percent asbestos by Calibrated Visual Area Estimation (CVAE). EPA regulations also indicate that Regulated Asbestos Containing Materials (RACM) — materials that are friable or may become friable — be further analyzed by point counting when the results indicate less than ten percent asbestos by CVAE. CatesLab utilizes CVAE on a routine basis and does not include point counting unless specifically requested by the client. The results may not be reproduced except in full. ICIT PLM REPORT SUMMARY Cates Laboratories NVLAP Lab No. 200569 -0 613 S. Bois D'Arc TDH License No. 30 -0287 Forney, Texas 75126 (972) 564 -4723 Client: MACTEC Engineering & Consulting, Inc. Lab Job No.: PLM -01517 Project: Highland Square - Tenants' Space #2 & #5, Roofing Report Date: 11/1612006 Project No: 6515 -06 -0452 Sample Date: 11/10/2006 Identification: Asbestos, Bulk Sample Analysis Test Method: Polarized Light Microscopy/Dispersion Staining (PLM /DS) EPA Method 600/R- 93/116 Page 2 of 3 On 11/13/2006, twenty (20) bulk samples were submitted by Mr. Karl Kologiski of MACTEC Engineering & Consulting, Inc. for asbestos analysis by PLM/DS. Copies of the lab data sheets are attached; additional information may be found therein. The results are summarized below: Lab Client Sample Description/Location Asbestos Content Sample No. Field I.D. CL069095 RF -16 Parapet Wall Flashing - Tenant Space 92, East Wall None Detected - Roof Flashing CL069096 RF -17 Parapet Wall Flashing - Tenant Space 45, Northeast Wall None Detected - Roof Flashing CL069097 RF 78 Parapet Wall Flash' Tenant Space #5; Soptheast Wall ;2 %Chrysottle Roofmg Masttc :" :'None Detected, ;Roof:FiasEim g. CL069098 RF J 9 Roof Yent Hood Flashttig Tenant Space #2, Centet Hood 2% Chrysotile 12oofing Masttc ..s ..; _.. None Detected 'RoofFlas n lu :; g CL069099 RF -20 Roof Vent Hood Flashing - Tenant Space #5, Last Center Hood None Detected - Roofing Mastic None Detected - Roof Flashing These samples were analyzed by layers. The overall percent asbestos for the sample is reported when relevant. The EPA considers a material to be asbestos containing only if it contains greater than one percent asbestos by Calibrated Visual Area Estimation (CVAE). EPA regulations also indicate that Regulated Asbestos Containing Materials (RACM) — materials that are friable or may become friable — be further analyzed by point counting when the results indicate less than ten percent asbestos by CVAE. CatesLab utilizes CVAE on a routine basis and does not include point counting unless specifically requested by the client. The results may not be reproduced except in full. CT PLM REPORT SUMMARY Cates Laboratories 613 S. Bois D'Arc Forney, Texas 75126 (972) 564 -4723 NVLAP Lab No. 200569 -0 TDH License No. 30 -0287 Client: MACTEC Engineering & Consulting, Inc. Lab Job No.: PLM -01517 Project: Highland Square - Tenants' Space k & #5, Roofing Report Date: 11/1612006 Project No: 6515 -06 -0452 Sample Date: 11/10/2006 Identification: Asbestos, Bulk Sample Analysis Test Method: Polarized Light Microscopy /Dispersion Staining (PLM /DS) EPA Method 600 /R- 93/116 Page 3 of 3 On 11113/2006, twenty (20) bulk samples were submitted by Mr. Karl Kologiski of MACTEC Engineering & Consulting, Inc. for asbestos analysis by PLMMS. Copies of the lab data sheets are attached; additional information may be found therein. STATEMENT OF LABORATORY ACCREDITATION The samples were analyzed in general accordance with the procedures outlined in the Method for the Determination of Asbestos in Bulk Building Materials, EPA /600/R- 93/116 or the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency method, under AHERA, for the analysis of asbestos in building materials by polarized light microscopy. The results of each bulk sample relate only to the material tested and the results shall not be used to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any agency of the U.S. Government. Specific questions concerning bulk sample results shall be directed to the Laboratory Director. Analyst: Mark Turner �y Laboratory Director: John R. Cates, P.G. Approved Signatory: MEEP G! APPENDIX C LICENSES AND CERTIFICATIONS r, W, " 'R77 VjIF 7' l.l"l!lllTTWq"V 7771 AFC Xtp APPENDIX C LICENSES AND CERTIFICATIONS r, W, " STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARZM ENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION ASBESTOS LICENSING UNIT (850) 487 -1395 1940 NORTH STRFLT32399 -0783 STAUFFER, RUSSELL E 1898 SETON CT CLEARWATER FL 33763 -4434 I i STATE OFFLORIDA AC.# 17 7 2 0 6 2 =iAT- ikf, pi- sus %T$sS .$ 00000a'6u £i.•;' !b �4,�i``:040+l99949 t_•,,.�":��..�+ '•.%' ^�� -mot`. ASBESTOS z ,,.�iNEER is LICENSED' a. the poet seioaa of C3i.+469- Pal e��esoo asset gRv 30, 2006 LOti�oso5a33.•:: DETACH HERE i %jJ 1 Vii• i'RTM : USTNS S�S�`f�7 �RE ZION Se;. ,^ �?', - "-'` $ vp�t•'�r >.;;, - `':ti • •.... .. ; •: •.': •SEL'G41�0.2'65�3�3:' —F w �. • 1 ,Q,�'TiYS�/i.. S -- rj ^�- t �^ r�^ -: � -�. �.' F.aN TI�S�'UI�`i�- r'' i.. LICLWSL• NBR + $ A g a.?.i' '�'.+ =f7� :: Y•�ij-�: .rY6. _ �'Li'- ;� •.- .. r` •;s =Y - BFQ�: LOIVyS[LTkT'r _ _ - _�,•�.� ;•�. a •k :; ^: , p�oii�;sions; 200 y �sc " ". 'y :�; • :. t:qq��.'' 4:•�,� - - �yt T'^t,,;.h� .,. ;rte.' � ,�•i� ' +' �•r:, �•ry y,�: _'.:' ?^i :..f,: .�c,¢••, ya��. ty f -r'. '•L,rtA Ad, '�l � •�•' =�:a� 'b �y�" �, d� _�7 �: r ..� :a .;.F. .Ci . }. {t'.1,+ ?��R :r�.'E�u. ..N fyy�.�1.�1'i.. ^.. .9 ' :"F. f.�. .. -?' i <, ir:r, .::• r: #:.r: �`F '. {•w'+n _ _-�F4 ..r(f -yjr,. t • r :�� ?.K- ��• .ti�'•... .. • ry � __ � l � i7,►717'� . °y�`�P'AD�r� -'E •;a 'R •,v �;7� .:�t�;'9'8�•<E�1§T':'4T;•� .,•,��....; :�;i;.:..:�aa+• .:r� �`�. i::� i :ii ic•:r: �:,.:: �:a�� .. -� ?`} .• .. ..,;,••.�� ' 1... .... • X44.3 OO .�qt�'4 .:. i :i: '.iii ^ °. -yii i',- '•'�'ri•a- ��`t'W! `•''F,�l '•' §~ .:: i''r�'..: .�i ii �%i'.j�y.. •Jett. _1. ,•:.� �ya. hT ::l ::a.. :,�:.: ,ysrN .,'`1 y,:i.- ;ra "e'.:ji .y` .1ff�. '�15 �. .�e! C�� :. -t�'� �'. H,r' . }a: :f'• - �LS i ' ��? � ••�"�s � K Y. y.;. • _,•'• •:'l 2. ._)�:.�'- ' Dom' �� ,�:`• !?+tj. �:.., '�,,� .. _ •r t. _• i STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION ASBESTOS LICENSING UNIT (850) 487 -1395 1940 NORTH �~°0 4TALLAHASSEEMONROE STRFLT32399 -0783 MACTEC ENGINEERING AND CONSULTING, INC. BRIAN DUCHENE 1105 SANCTUARY.PKWY STE 300 ALPHARETTA GA 30004 STATE OFKOMDA AC# 2323076 DEPARTMENT OF BUSINL$S AM PROFESSIONAL 1EGULATION Zi 9000115 x.1/10/05 056369244 air;'= � �•�;�s.�. _. . .A + E S BIISINESS ORGANIZ}1TION 'A CT EL.GGTNEERING AND CONSULTING {�'�ItIAI�'.•bU�I#ENE i IS LICENSED under tho provisions of Ch.469 ss. ' 6xyiratioa date: NOV 30, 2007 L05111001390, DETACH HERE ................ . ............................... . .. ...................................... ACS 2323076 STATE OF FLORIDA f 4,�. IN ````,.;, DEPARTMENT OF:'BUSZNESS.AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION=Z.4''' }�f ~; y ASENSTOS LICENSING# IVIT z 7I7 301 s (. -ation' date : DING, INC — PKWY PKWY FL 32804. d �: '-Na - � t• Dk§Fp AY AS REQUIRED BY nas, compietea trie -requisite -4 Hour training course for Asbestos' Accreditation Under TSCA Title 11 for the "Asbestos Abatement: Inspector Refresher" Course FL CE Course No. FL49- 0002835 CEU Awarded: 0.4 . P in p 1 instructor Russ St r' ci a auffer Rnttrb 4tate's Enutronmientat rotation Aglenru, a X 4, s �;,�ma has fulfilled the requirements of the Toxi Substan�aCon 402(a)!1 �nnd has received certification to conduct leaded painttivi ' art 745. Was a: 4 � �hi w Cy�A sS k 4 v Florida This certification is valid from the date of issuance and expires September 10. 2007. FL -R -971 &1 Certification # "" Joanne a tee Chief �r• Pesticides and Toxic Substances Branch. Issued On 11'1'4'►'iti . M LLC ff1 "Pi*� • erti i ca te. of c. tevement ►�..: Carol Thoma OHCEt vir°onYnental Engineering has successfully completed the Manufacturer's Training Course . for the NITON Spectrum Analyzer and is now certifier! in radiation safety and monitoring, measurement technology, Il ►�.1;` and machine maintenance of the NITON XRF Spectrum Analyzer, ►f`� ►i•` A4042940885. Certificate Number Training Coordinator, 05/19/04 Orlando FL ►<�..•.. ►. ►..•. Date & Site o nurse Director of Training iIf (r1'� man . ...... . ... - ......... . .............. .. .. .. .. . . .. ........... . Principal Instructor: 'Russ Stauffer 1, , ^7 � � ! •n,7• . -' ( \,, �r ,��1 �: � �i ' ^ l �r� �,� , +r) • f +r� 1 : �� ,i , M , •,4L. � �,�% 'M. ,l -•�r l .'',l, n1 .NWA , �/) •t v i `` t Af � ` l! i{ �'j'jf/`�1 { \yyy'jJ /� 1� � \i. 1 J�yf 3� 5• ', �� t � CJ R t v '\ � � :7 . , 1 � � • � � JT :1. v� ` 7.; ! ?1 •i: /• :�, ' f\::. '�. .�.. �(�.f 1\j,e . p �., i'f \� •s•+ '� �f �� r.�t•''r� � \i �"" +,�• h!� � ., `' ' � � ' \ � 'u '• \ _s' r • �:�' . n '�. . �! fi T1;i . ''1+ a I4. f � �t ri �)( v' � F ,+•• f ?J�� • �) _ `- ��l�r. A \L ,�1, � n'_ ��.:.J � 1 ..� i q!7 �,.,.•e{�1� � ' ``�� ..4 �1`� �,,: � �n �r7� .i>��5'� ��A�?��1^"...�:U` ,�' �' �A�� ^�� ? ".� r �`!i,�n��'� � �l ✓" .: 1: j Gj �1 It / N i 1 ; Tzi r. ' l 1 • ��/� 'sy' ;• l� iE /' '•_'"�� v r..��),E%l,e�►;►� •\�i,E / / /�►.,a..�'i \�),l ly ►ta. { v.. v .y 1 u. Lr:, Id:.'�ti.:t.i� ),E ,- l � /�•ryC�n �' }: v � � i\ ••`!- � J V °/' 1 y �,6i��3'• .. .K'1 %'� - .�V.` ��+ \J� _ `�:: +4: Y!':% , ... �h L {:� f sk , 11 Q.. ` '{yj� / +/ •.� f '� ]:{�r,.,wy, j(t,� 1r r�iµS y�yj .�G� �. 1 'fie' r y ea JAY;• IR ' WAL*MART SUSTAINABILITY 1, CLUB fl WAL*MART NEIGHBORHOOD MARKET STORE #4667-00 N. HIGHLAND AVENUE & GREENLEA DRIVE 'i J-rE& WAL*IVIART CLEARWATER CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA id - Canw msooas, � URBAN RESOURCE GROUP A WAM Of ~41M AN ASWUM URBAN RESOURCE GROUP A DIVISION Of KIMLEY -HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. April 2, 2007 Ms. Rebekah Rodriguez Senior Design Manager Wal -Mart Stores, Inc. 2001 SE 10`h Street Bentonville, AR 72716 -0550 RE: Job #047253467, Wal -Mart Clearwater, Store No. 4667 -00, NSC Dear Ms. Rodriguez: Urban Resource Group, a division of Kimley -Horn and Associates, Inc. (URG/KHA) performed a limited field observation on January 3, 2007 to review existing trees affected by the proposed construction. The evaluation was based upon a proposed site plan dated December 7, 2006, provided by KHA with existing tree locations based on a survey (Dated November 15, 2006) provided by Phoenix Land Surveying and Engineering, LLC. Each protected tree was photographed, measured, and evaluated based on existing conditions. The above referenced observations were not intended to be exhaustive or to extend to every aspect of the proposed construction. Observations were limited to spot checking, selective measurement, and similar methods of general observation of the protected trees based on URG's exercise of professional judgment. The purpose of URG's site visit was to provide the Client a greater degree of confidence in deciding what efforts should be made to protect, remove, or relocate existing trees affected by the proposed construction. URG shall not be responsible for the acts or omissions of any contractor, subcontractors, suppliers, or of any other individual or entity performing or furnishing any work for the project site described herein. URG certifies that all of the statements in this report are true, complete, and correct .- to the best of URG's knowledge based on above ground, visual field observations conducted on January 3, 2007. URG's compensation is not contingent upon a predetermined value or direction of value that favors any party in this case. URG has no present or prospective interest in the trees that are the subject of this report, and has no personal interest or bias with respect to the parties involved. The following report is comprised of background information provided to support the tree observations. If you have any questions, or need any additional information, please contact Chris Hice. Sincerely, ORIGINAL URBAN RESOURCE GROUP RECWD A Divi of Kimley -Horn and Associates, Inc. APR 0 2 2007 PL4NNiNG, DIrPARIMENT Christopher ice, ISA CITY OF CLEARWATER Certified Arborist, FL -5363A URBAN & DEVELOPMENT PLANNING • LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE • SITE GRAPHICS 2601 Cattlemen Road, Suite 500, Sarasota, FL 34232 voice: 941.926.1730 • fax: 941.922.2351 CONTENTS TreeEvaluation Methodology ............................................ ............................... 1 Survey............................................................................ ............................... 1 AerialPhoto .................................................................. ............................... 1 Cityof Clearwater Coordination ........................................... ............................... 1 TreeInventory Plan ........................................................ ............................... 2 Protected Trees ............................................................... ............................... 3 HazardousTrees ............................................................ ............................... 3 TreeCondition Evaluation ................................................ ............................... 4 Justificationof Tree Removal............ ................................. ............................... 4 TreePreservation Plan ..................................................... ............................... 4 TreeReplacement Calculations .......................................... ............ .I.................. 5 TreeCare/Pruning Guidelines ............................................ ............................... 5 Equipment.................................................................... ............................... 7 Summary...................................................................... ............................... 7 Definitions.................................................................... ............................... 9 Appendix 1— Survey of Existing Conditions Appendix 2 — Aerial Photo Appendix 3 — Tree Inventory Plan, Tree Preservation Plan, Landscape Plans/Details; and Color Rendered Landscape Plan Appendix 4 — Tree Condition Evaluation Form Appendix 5 — Tree Summary Spreadsheet Appendix 6 — Existing Tree Photographs APR 0 2 2007 PLANNING DEPARIMENf CITY OF OLEARWA EP Tree Observation Report Prepared by Christopher M. Hice,1S.A — Certified Arborist (FL 5363SA) All tree measurement and inspection data for this report was collected during site observations conducted on January 3, 2007. YE - sErVdi n WAL•MART CLEARWATER G 0 l Tree Evaluation Methodology This tree observation report is based on guidelines provided in the City of Clearwater Community Development Code, as well as the Guide for Plant Appraisal, 9`h Edition, as established by the Council of Tree and Landscape Appraisers (CTLA). CTLA is a consortium of seven national trade, educational, and scientific associations, including the International Society of Arboriculture, The American Society of Consulting Arborists, the National Arborist Association, the American Society of Landscape Architects, the Association of Consulting Foresters of America, and-the Associated Landscape Contractors of America (now known as Professional Landcare Network). Survey The proposed project site is greater than one (1) acre in area, and therefore requires a topographical survey of the property to be provided to the City of Clearwater. Observations were made based on a survey (dated November 15, 2006) provided by Phoenix Land Surveying and Engineering, LLC. The survey is provided in Appendix 1 of this report and shows the location and size of all protected trees and palms. Aerial Photo Due to the season of our site observations, aerial photos were used to help determine the health and vigor of some of the canopies that were bare from the fall foliage drop. An example of an aerial photo with the proposed site layout is provided in Appendix 2 of this report. City of Clearwater Coordination URG began coordinating with the City of Clearwater primarily via phone and email to discuss code clarification, the overall scale of the project and any potential conflicts with the City's codes and goals as they pertained to tree removal and tree preservation. Rick Albee has been the primary contact for the City of Clearwater, and is a representative of the Land Resources Department as well as the Building Plan Review Committee (BPRC). Mr. Albee was able to meet URG's ISA- Certified Arborist at the site on January 8`h, 2007 to discuss preliminary findings and concerns with the existing trees and the impacts that proposed construction may have. URG and Mr. Albee had previously discussed two (2) tree evaluation methods, one (1) provided by Mr. Albee, and one (1) provided by URG. After brief discussion it was agreed that URG's tree evaluation method was acceptable and would be used for the purposes of this observation. At the conclusion of the meeting on January 8`h; 2007, Mr. Albee elected to have the existing trees reviewed by another arborist. After that evaluation it was conveyed to URG that "It was determined that these trees can become hazardous and should be removed. Replacements will be calculated on a tree for tree basis, not an inch for inch." Further Mr. Albee stated "The tree for tree replacement will be for the B &B trees planted with the previous landscape planting. All other trees will be inch for inch if they are rated at 50% (Average) and above. Declining trees do not need to be replaced." URG's evaluation method does not provide an average rating, therefore for the purposes of this project any tree rated in "Poor" condition is considered to be a declining tree. Trees rated "fair" or better were calculated in the replacement calculations. See "Tree Condition Evaluation" below for further clarification on URG's evaluation methods. With the above communications from Mr. Albee, URG has prepared a Tree Inventory Plan (Sheet L100), a Tree Preservation Plan (Sheet L101) and Landscape Plans & Details (Sheets L102 and L103). These plans are included in Appendix 3 of this report. Please refer to the Tree Page 1 f WAL -MART CLEARWATER G V 7 Preservation Plan for explanation of the requirements on an inch for inch basis as well as a tree for tree basis. Tree Inventory Plan The Tree Inventory Plan was prepared under the direction of an ISA- Certified Arborist (FL- 5363A) and consists of all existing trees four (4) inches Diameter Breast Height (DBH) and greater specifying the species, size, average canopy spread (see drip line, fig. 1), and condition of such trees. Please refer to.the Tree Inventory Plan for more detailed information regarding tree removal /replacement calculations and tree barricade locations. ORIGINAL_ RECEIVED APR 0 2 2007 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER Dripline means an imaginary line along the ground which reflects the perimeter of the crown of a tree extended vertically to the ground. Page .2 rF servatt n WAL MART CLEARWATER ` O L Protected Trees Per Article 8, Section 8 -102 of the City of Clearwater Community Development Code: • Protected tree means any non - hazardous tree other than a prohibited tree of four (4) inches DBH or greater, and any palm with a ten (10) foot clear trunk. • Specimen tree means any tree which is determined to be of high value to the community because of its type, size, age, and exceptional quality. • Specimen tree stand means a contiguous grouping or cluster of trees which has been determined to be of high value based upon one or more of the following: o The relative maturity and even age of the stand; o The purity of the tree species composing the stand; o The rare or unusual nature of the stand; and o The aesthetic quality of the stand and so designated by the community development coordinator Based on URG's site observations, no observations were made that would designate an individual tree as a potential specimen tree. Two (2) areas qualify as specimen tree stands and are specified on the Tree Preservation Plan. Both specimen tree stands are outside of the demising line between Wal -Mart and the seller retained property and the overall project property line. All existing trees that were observed were considered to be protected before the condition evaluation was performed. Hazardous Trees Per Article 8, Section 8 -102 of the City of Clearwater Community Development Code: • Hazardous tree means a tree that constitutes a hazard to life or has a significant potential to cause injury to persons or damage to property as the tree is in imminent danger of falling, or is otherwise considered to be or likely to create a hazard. A hazardous tree shall include but not be limited to dead, diseased, broken, split, cracked, leaning and uprooted trees. A hazardous tree shall also include a tree harboring communicable diseases or insects of a type that could infest and cause the decline of adjacent trees. Through careful consideration and observations, as well as ongoing communications with Mr. Albee, it was determined that trees in the existing parking islands may become hazardous and should be removed. As agreed with Mr. Albee the replacement requirements for these trees was calculated on a tree for tree basis, rather than an inch for inch basis, which is typically required. While no existing trees considered to be hazardous were observed during URG's site observations, URG stresses that there is no such thing as a "Safe Tree ", and bears no responsibility regarding the safety of the existing trees observed. ORIGINAL RECERIVED APR 0 2 2007 PLANNING DEPARITAENT Page 3 CITY OF CLEARWATER WAL MART CLEARWATER c V Tree Condition Evaluation URG utilized the "Tree Condition Evaluation Form" (Approved by the City of Clearwater) to determine the specific condition points for each physical attribute described below. Evaluations were based upon visual observation from the ground surface only. A sample copy of the Tree Condition Evaluation form can be found in Appendix 4 of this report. ORIGINAL C��P� 1. Roots (above ground visual observation) RE 2. Trunk APR 0 2 2007 3. Limb and branch structure PEANNiNG DEPARTMENT 4. Twigs CITY OF CLEARWATER 5. Foliage Based on the above attributes URG established a "Tree Condition Ranking" (Excellent, Good, Fair, Poor) determined from the sum of the condition points. Detailed information based on the results of URG's observations is located on the Tree Inventory Plan and in a spreadsheet format in Appendix 5 of this report. Photographs of evaluated trees are provided in Appendix 6 of this report. Justification of Tree removal Based on URG's observations and conclusions above, it is URG's opinion that it would not be ideal for any excavation to take place within the driplines of the existing trees which are to remain. The impact of construction for the trees within the areas of construction disturbance has the potential to significantly inhibit the health and survivability both during and after construction, and all activities should be monitored. While the existing trees are established, it is URG's opinion that potential construction activities could result in loss of a significant amount of their root systems, and the amount of oxygen and water currently available in the existing soil where feeder roots remain. Potential conflicts and tree survivability may present a substantial concern that could outweigh the advantages to preserving or relocating the trees in question. Due to the condition of the trees determined to be replaced on a tree for tree basis it is not recommended that transplanting be considered as an option. Tree Preservation Plan The Tree Preservation Plan was prepared under the direction of an ISA- Certified Arborist (FL- 5363A). The Tree Preservation Plan specifies how each tree is to be protected and identifies how site development impacts the critical root zones (driplines) and how to address these impacts, i.e. crown elevating, root pruning and/or root aeration systems. The Tree Preservation Plan specifies the tree barricade limits (two- thirds of the drip line and in the root prune lines, if any), and the tree barricade construction specifications and other pertinent tree preservation information and methods. The total amount of DBH removed from the project site shall be replaced on an inch - for -inch basis, except as previously mentioned and as shown on the Tree Preservation Plan. Replacement trees shall be a minimum of four (4) caliper (see fig. 2) inches providing for one - inch caliper total replacement for each one -inch DBH removed. Any number of trees may be utilized to meet the inch - for -inch requirement, provided that acceptable spacings and design are maintained. Replacement palms shall have a clear and straight trunk of ten feet. Page 4 DIAMETER IN INCHES 1� 1 6° - SUM TOTAL OF THE DIAMETER OF ALL STEMS r_onnc IN INCHES 6" SINGLE- STEMMED TREE MULTI- STEMMED TREE YE t stru h WAL MART CLEARWATER E V / i ORIGINAL RECEEIVED APR 0 2 2007 PLAT NiNG DEPARTMEfNT CITY OF CLEARWATER Caliper means the measurement of young or nursery trees and is measured at a height six inches above the ground or soil level for trees up to and including four inches in caliper and 12 inches above the ground for larger trees. Any landscaping required to be installed by section 3 -1202 or 3 -1203 may be used as credit against tree replacement requirements. (See Landscape Plans & Details, Sheets L102, and L103). Tree Replacement Calculations It is the intent of the City of Clearwater to establish minimum landscaping/tree protection standards in order to promote the preservation of existing tree canopies, to promote the expansion of that canopy and to promote the enhancement of the quality of existing and future development in the city. Tree removal /replacement calculations for this project are located on the Tree Preservation Plan. Tree Care/Pruning Guidelines In an effort to meet the intent of the proposed project, all proposed trees and existing trees to remain should not be topped, shaped or severely pruned, and should be allowed to grow to maturity and attain their natural form so that crown (see fig. 3) development is not inhibited. Page 5 Figure 3 - Crown ORIGINAL RFi;ElVFD APR 0 2 2007 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER Crown means all branch parts of a tree, including all stems, twigs and foliage. Proposed replacement trees which are balled and burlapped must have the burlap removed or folded down at the time of planting. All twine or rope must be removed. If wire baskets are used, the upper rows must be cut and removed from the planting pit before - planting. If stakes or guy wires are used to support a tree, the wire must be covered with protective material where it is in contact with the tree and the stakes or guy wires must be removed after one year. URG suggests two (2) site observation visits by a certified arborist or landscape architect to ensure proper planting procedures are followed. One (1) site visit immediately after installation and one (1) site visit after all stakes and guy wires have been removed. Proposed replacement trees and existing trees to remain should have an annual maintenance plan adopted and implemented for general maintenance and pruning. Any maintenance plan identifying pruning and other methods of tree care should comply with ANSI A300 and should be monitored by a certified arborist. Page 6 ORlGE . RECEIVED APR 0 2 2007 PbkHNiNG DJtPAWHVikNi Equipment CITY OF CLFAPW.ATFP YE SErUdl 11 WAL MART CLEARWATER E o The Opti -Logic LHA- series Laser Rangefinder/Hypsometer height measurement system combines a pulsed laser rangefinder and a vertical angle sensor. Incorporating an internal electronic tilt sensor, the Laser Rangefinder/Hypsometer makes vertical angle measurements with better than one (1) degree resolution to remotely determine object heights. Applications of the hypsometer measurement system include tree height measurements, construction, utilities, architectural measurements, landscaping, real estate appraisal, and much more. The OPTi -LOGIC 40OLHA Laser Range Finder was used during URG's site observations to measure the existing trees by shooting the distance, and angle (to top of tree) to determine tree height as well as canopy spread. Summary This report has been prepared in accordance with the professional standard of care. No other warranties or guarantees, express or implied, are made or intended. URG was retained to perform a limited tree observation, and performed only those tasks specifically stated in URG's scope of services. This report has been prepared solely for Wal -Mart Stores, Inc. for the purpose stated herein and should not be relied upon by any other party for any other purpose. Specifically, this report may not be used in connection with actual renovation or construction of any kind without first obtaining the appropriate permits. The conclusions in this report are based on the limited observation described above. Any reliance on this report by any party other than Wal -Mart Stores, Inc. shall be without liability to URG or its employees. The Client may use this report as part of its due diligence, but this report should not be used as the sole basis for the Client's decision making. We endeavored to research site development issues and constraints to the extent practical given the scope, budget, and schedule agreed to with the Client. Our assessment is based in large part on information provided to us by Kimley -Horn and Associates, Inc. and therefore is only as accurate and complete as the information provided to us. This report is based.on our knowledge as of March 13, 2007 and is based on the desires of the Client that have been specifically disclosed to us. New issues may arise during development because of changes in governmental rules and policy, changed circumstances, or unforeseen conditions URG affirms that URG's opinions have been made in total good faith, based on the facts presented during URG's field review, with no coercion from others. URG further affirms that that URG has no interest with the parties or people involved with this issue or any interest with regard to the outcome. URG's responsibility to Wal -Mart Stores, Inc. and Public Trust ends with this report. URG has no responsibility to inspect or ensure any or all of the recommendations made in this report are executed, planned, or implemented. This report does not fall under the category of Privileged Information or Confidential Work Product. To simplify information in this report, it is sometimes necessary to use trade names of products, equipment, and firms. No endorsement is intended, nor is criticism implied of similar products, equipment, and firms which are not mentioned. Page 7 Definitions REI!C� City of Clearwater, Community Development Code Article 8, Section 8 -102 APR 02 2007 PLANNiNC iSEPARTMENT Arboriculture means the care and maintenance of trees. CITY OF CLEARWATER Coniferous means a tree belonging to a group of mostly evergreen trees that bear true cones or arillate fruit. Critical root zone means the rooting area of a tree, within the tree's dripline, which if injured or otherwise disturbed is likely to directly affect a tree's, chance for survival. Crown means all branch parts of a tree, including all stems, twigs and foliage. Diameter breast height (DBH) means a measurement of mature trees and is measured at a height four and one -half feet above the ground or soil level. Dripline means an imaginary line along the ground which reflects the perimeter of the crown of a tree extended vertically to the ground. Hazardous tree means a tree that constitutes a hazard to life or has a significant potential to cause injury to persons or damage to property as the tree is in imminent danger of falling, or is otherwise considered to be or likely to create a hazard. A hazardous tree shall include but not be limited to dead, diseased, broken, split, cracked, leaning and uprooted tree. A. hazardous tree shall also include a tree harboring communicable diseases or insects of a type that could infest and cause the decline of adjacent trees. Palm tree means a self - supporting, fibrous stemmed monocotyledon plant of the family Arecaceae (Palmae). Prohibited tree means Punk (cajeput) tree - Melaleuca quinquenervia also known as Melaleuca leucodendron; Brazilian pepper - Schinus terebinthifolius; Australian Pine - Casuarina equisetifolia; and Chinese Tallow - Sapium sebiferum. Protected tree means any non - hazardous tree other than a prohibited tree of four (4) inches DBH or greater. Remove or removal means the actual removal of a protected tree or causing the effective removal through damaging, poisoning, excessive pruning, or other direct or indirect actions resulting in the death of a protected tree. Shade tree means a self - supporting, woody plant which normally grows to a minimum height of 35 feet in the county, has a trunk which can be maintained with over eight feet of clear wood, and which is of a species having an average mature spread of cover greater than 25 feet. Specimen tree means any tree which is determined to be of high value to the community because of its type, size, age, exceptional quality, or other professional criteria, and so designated by the community development coordinator. Page 9 �— YF SfrVdf n WAL -MART CLEARWATER ` C / l Specimen tree stand means a contiguous grouping or cluster of trees which has been determined to be of high value based upon one or more of the following: a. The relative, maturity and .even age of the stand; b. The purity of the tree species composing the stand; c. The rare or unusual nature of the stand; and d. The aesthetic quality of the stand and so designed by the community development coordinator. Topping means utilizing inter -nodal cuts to remove the vertical leader stems on protected trees. Tree means any erect standing woody plant, together with its root system, of a species which normally attains a minimum overall height at maturity of at least 15 feet in the Clearwater. area. ORIGI NL VFI APR 02 2001 P ®F C� WA ERA Page 10 APPENDIX suRvty or 1XISTINQ C9nDITI9. nS ORIGINAL RECEN /M APR 0 2 2007 � t "�iivMEv �E i 614ENT SIT OFEF�iRVi��TEI le 0 E s 8 C I� -- -- -- - - -� ---- - -F- -- - -- `-- - - - --- - -- ------ -- - - -- 1 nsa - - --- h - J I I -j y� I - tra sJa' I trove. LOV I -- rR Awl ++Inri 3 I d2YCLUDED 4 . ..P._ a. azw sacs pa 7m ( I, cr j rn r . s° K z ■ i wnn, Rt c+tP Mo a> FP9D �...i..w , �C" JOEL `a°'r LANE «, - - _'"'G4I>!0'" I . 1 _.._ - - - _,.i rpm- r• cr o f 1 4 It i I FFPw p �TTi,TUTT /7�T/7�. t r v ` - srrrrr .1x73&7 8avaica�'w=r, ae 7la A ACS PAN= I 4r ow - - - - -- A t 19 -I all= ' I ol I � I � •� -_ � NO �/�" �", si ` vex � I I- - - - - ; � j• i l { p �,�u1w a O s �• �9 DRIVE atauraas srrr cf- , - ° v_ --v1 -_ _vim- ---v---v--- ► -v-i -_ a cS ° 11 �� o: all 11.1 -0I 1111 1 } w y� �ryy IGp? p ORIA N REINED Z co APR 0 2 2001 x X w PLKNNiNG DiPAWiMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER 0 yr � J Z W Z W c Q Q Lij F- Z Z C iw w O = v 29 DATE PROJECT ND. o .n e0 03 08 07 iA sEfEET NUMBER OFtAPF9C SCALE APPENDIX 2 AERIAL Pfd °T° Drawing name: H: 047253 — Wal —Mart 651 — Clearwater (Highland) CADD Exhibit: Aerial with site plan.dwg 24x36 Mar 07. 2007 12:513pm by: nat.linden ml. document, together with the awmpt, o,d d„Ig„ we ... I" h,rN . o, rn efm of .ery I. .—d,d only fm tn, ,wpifk Rurpo„ and dwt for „roh It ,d, w,pm.d. Rw„ of one • pmpw .•none. on thl. --t iA '94 n I _ m ° m o CLEARWATER HIGHLAND SCALE AS AS NOTED DESIGNED By ❑�❑ Kimley -Horn v Nm �Oy STORE No. 4667 -00 SITE PLAN I a p 'i and Associates, Inc. iE SE7t1Qit n C wy �m ■ - DRAWN BY © 2007 KIMLEY –HORN AND ASSOCIATES. INC. m N2 O o O N HIGHLAND AVE AND GREANLEA DR. NRL 0117 PRNCESS PA M AVENUE, S: E 300. iANPA FL JJ610 PHONE: 813- 620 -1460 FAX: 813 - 620 -1542 WALMAART CLEARWMTFN E ort A _ CITY OF CLEARWAIER FLORIDA n _ m ° m o CLEARWATER HIGHLAND SCALE AS AS NOTED DESIGNED By ❑�❑ Kimley -Horn v Nm �Oy STORE No. 4667 -00 SITE PLAN NRL r- ORIDAREGISTRATIONNUMBER: and Associates, Inc. iE SE7t1Qit n C wy �m DRAWN BY © 2007 KIMLEY –HORN AND ASSOCIATES. INC. m N2 O o O N HIGHLAND AVE AND GREANLEA DR. NRL 0117 PRNCESS PA M AVENUE, S: E 300. iANPA FL JJ610 PHONE: 813- 620 -1460 FAX: 813 - 620 -1542 WALMAART CLEARWMTFN E ort A _ CITY OF CLEARWAIER FLORIDA CHECKED BY DWW DATE: WWW.KIMLEY– HORN.COM CA 00000696 APPENDIX 3 TREE IN,V1T9RY PLAN TREE PRESERVAT19N PLAN LANDSCAPE PLANS/DETAILS C A OLYR RENDERED LANDSCAPE PLAN AN 0 2 2007 pLNWWHG- D-r-?Ak i M E CITY OF C-LEAWWNTEP p i i i. E 6 t 1 � I N T PALT75 I EVA � t , e ZIN I I TME00MMONEVALUAT10N . t� m S P.L '. .OBM . Ctrcrrnkrence liel gM .. S CorMalae -RmM StAlra 1 1 ( I F Frxr P lr—d 2 # U o Oak 1 17 53 % 39 . Far Z 30 IU Ok 15 47 23 % For RWmvad 4 Ui Oak 13 41 26 34 i� FFGrnoved 5 U. 0* - 13 41' 23 30 Pow PwWq d 6 P.I. 14 i E> I 15 Exodtet Raman - 7 CatbRgo Pam - 15 47- i7 15 Exo48at- E TNE. TREES -:1H THIS r z6 g SWMA.D Ndr BE AFFP m, � PRM 47 f4 CONSTRUCTN7PC'AND I .NOT OVAL IM Exoeam F 1J 9 Pa1rr 12 % 7 15 E-ele Rmtm 10 Parr THIS' GROUP; II OF 8 is PINES IS CONSIDERED T' Rm h A SPEC"M TRFZ Si Lhe Ook 1 Sm TREE PRESEWA 8 CC j Te PLAN (LIM) FM'.Mrrr.0 �- INkImto i 4% f p i i i. E 6 t 1 � I N T PALT75 I EVA � t , e ZIN I I TME00MMONEVALUAT10N . @ TREE S P.L '. .OBM . Ctrcrrnkrence liel gM .. S CorMalae -RmM StAlra 1 Lhe Oak I 20 63 35 45 Frxr P lr—d 2 # U o Oak 1 17 53 % 39 . Far Fk r..ed 30 IU Ok 15 47 23 % For RWmvad 4 Ui Oak 13 41 26 34 Pon FFGrnoved 5 U. 0* - 13 41' 23 30 Pow PwWq d 6 P.I. 14 M - 1A 15 Exodtet Raman - 7 CatbRgo Pam - 15 47- i7 15 Exo48at- ftr 8 Pa111 is 47 f4 i5 Exoeam Rem.Y. 9 Pa1rr 12 % 7 15 E-ele Rmtm 10 Parr 12 38 1 2 is E—IM Rm h 11 . Lhe Ook 1 11 % 24 29 FaFr Rerm.ed 12 Slash Pine 14 - 44 60 - 25 Good Rermwd 13 Slash Pho 15 47 63 23 Good Rorrein 14 Slash PM 15 47 6/ 24 Good Fb—irr /5 S1a;h Phre 19 60 -62 22 Gold Reman 16 Sla;h PIrM 11 35 62 10 - Geod Rennin 17 Smh Pine, 14 d4 66 24 Good Ramtln 18 SM h Pi.' 14 44 E8 25 Good Rertem .--19V U. Oak :' 17 53 30 37 Far RmM.ed 2D# Lhd Oak 16 57 1 37 44 Flit Rertp a0 2111 LhoOak 15 47 35 - 42 Pow - Rm—d 22 LheOak 15 47 1 ' 35 38 Fan ftl,. Ld 23 Lho Oak 13 41 I 20 25 Far W—W - 24 Lho Oak 13. 41 - 26 - 25. - Good ... Roll —d 25 Lhe Oek 15 47. % 33 .Good Rarllan, 26 Lie Oak - 11 35 27 - 26 - Far Remsin " 27 U. Oek 14 44. 32 29 Fah R-131n 28 Lie Oak 12 38 33 -30 Fah R N> 29 LU Oak 11 35 31 29 Fah RemBn, 30 Lhe Oak 14 44 1 27 33 .Far FL111 —d. 31 Lhe Oak 13 - 41 " . 1 30 27 - - Far - Fb-- -d 32 Lhe par 11 35 { 24 28 Far FR. —d 3311 U. Oak - 10 31 -. 1 18 - 25 Poor ii;; d 3411' Uh Oak 14 44. .' 1 26 32 Pmr Runorcd 35 LAC Onk 13 41 27 33 Poor R .Md % Li.e OBk .12 38 24 27 .Fah Rrrro.ed 37 Live Oak 14 4q 29 34 -F& Rartnned % U. Oak - is 47 25 29' - F44 F41r11aed % - Lhe Oak 16 s0 3t 32 Far Remand 40 Lie Oak 1s W % 33 Far Rmaved 41 Lhe Oak 15 47' 1 34 32 Felr P-r—d 4211 U.Oak 15 47 1 27 34 Pow RCrm.Cd 43A IUvnO* .12 % 1 27 33 Pow 1>rnrald 44 U.0.* 9 28 1' 18 24 Fwr Permed 45P U. Oak 9 28 20 23 Pow Rnnad - 46# Live Oak - is 47 -25 - 32 - Pow R Md 47ig Lm Oak 20 &T % 43 Fair Renmed 48# Live Oak 19 60 37 4S Pow Rsrr¢ 49 Live Oak 17 - 53 33 39 Pow Rienxlled pq# Live Oak. 13 41 26 32 Fair Fkrrkrmd 51 Lko Oak 11 35 33 32 Far - Rcmoed 52# Livo Oak - 12 30 1 25 34 Far I Remand 5311 LW Oak 10 31 27 28 Pow Remand 54 - CbWp Pdm 12 39 20 15 - Exoellb4 Rdooa:cd 56 ICbbMePatm 10' 31 1 20 15 Exaener4 Rd 56 Un Oak 12 % 1 -27 31 Far RmMwd 57 L"re Oak 1s 50 28 33 Far Remand 68# Lie Oak 9 28 221 24 Far Remand 59S Lie Oak 14 44 28 30 For Re...d 80 C Peon 72 - 38 20 15 Excellent Raacaed s1 PaSn 9 28 20 15 Exoalent Rel".ed 62 CaU o. PWri 11 35 19 15 Exadlan Rdacated 83 Patin 12 38 '18 15 Excdlml Rd4catcd ord oak 13 41 24 31 Pow Rern—d _ Pekn 13 41 5 15 F xcellerd Reman Oak .14 m. 26 37 . Flr Remo-ed Pam 16 50 6 15 E —oast Remain o Oak 13 A1- 29 35 - -Fair Rarmovatl it Oak 13 47 28 35 Fair Romped o Oak 9 28 .I. 24 23 Fair Remand e Oak 8 25 1 22 22 Fair Rmvomd C Oak - - 8 25 21 - 22 Pew - Retuned * —Elm 8. 25 . I 14 20 Fr RenxnM e Nutm SRe I 75 C.U.0e Palm 18 57' 9. 15 - Good . - Raman 76 Lhe Oak 13 41 % 26 far Roman 77 " Wars Otk - 10 31 - 26 m - Poor Rammed'. 78 W.v OA - - - - - 43 41 Fair Rarmin 79 Fe .. S—dg.. 13 41 1 % 19 Good Remain 80 Slash P- - 18 - 57 I 62 32 - Gmd Rwmin 81 Formula 9-d 14 44 61 41 25. Goad Remain 82 L—OA 28 88 1 51 62 Good Rlmein 83 Weer Oak 14 44 I 38 48 Far Rerrned 64 1,51ash P- 1 19 1 60 fis 41 -Good Raman &^r W1r'.er Oak 13 41 E 41 Pmr Rencled 86 C4 _FMm 9 28 16 45 Exoellml Rdocated 87 Cad:IrM Layrc1 25 25 Excetlem Rmain Jaceama 40 23 Exoalknt Rcrmin Jeea2rda - 47 47 Exeollmt Remain I kl$ 6 a �B �i J � p� �B �p S � I T+ J C 6 N G 1 9 E t I i 0 R n - •ATORa XMM of ALL e1'E�Ms OF 11NIG1TT7VE6 dtm ObN. PALM neD:xl, AT OR AT ORI TRIPLJE OP ALL PR0I ME MT M PNE iT Am OIER 0(>tMM TTY Y 6 AT OR I 16 CF TIE PRFLNE CF ALL OMM V"MM 1PoE GFECiE6. 4 PRO'47:TIVL N1N M OF TIED OW A EI'EC.M TM 6TMU AM ON6TMMM {16!19 NO LE66 T" TWO -NCH BY Tit-t" LIMER OF Q~ POD, LFRoff FOM 76 AM to M76 ANE TD Of LM A 1•MMM CP CM VMT ANCHORED N GPPJV AV ifAiF1: FELT AMW OITMNm. "ONT ODE NM BY F M COMM OF WOW FEET APART. H6>rdt MAL PALS AM TO BE COILY IWW IWO NO LM6 TEAK o001TDNAlOR ML B i16'J�IR YY ATTA AW TO '1fNI0. CF THE IP MHT P 06T. THE COM'OINY DEmA w b IMEA M A MANNED, B ON" MUN N MAAM IMR A L 00DDTR6IWICH ACTI VW 6 INNO&M. THE AMA M MOFlflMW MY to b ------ VOWAMNb i6PtTTT91 oOIEE l0.00' t nny ULTf w COONOWTOR oa. M+wr .f�, % r:s rt_ f?PlIOR TO 1H / MEA 1 61Pu l Il lAE P6WD I I� �T'ROTE1CITON BARRIER (7YP. �I } i t ANY PALM LIMA IM400 CUWX OR e?MMQ T TMW D FOR ADONOML NOTEL THE CITY NEA601IA aE OPF1DA16N6TY TO so a'ATF THN TOM LAM AMM ALL PROTECTED t1®6 Fwlae TO LArm MWAMM OR manou Tm AcTry 6 z XMM of ALL e1'E�Ms OF 11NIG1TT7VE6 dtm ObN. PALM neD:xl, \� TRIPLJE OP ALL PR0I ME MT M PNE iT Am OIER 0(>tMM TTY Y 6 ,oTAL onRe err Oe„ 16 CF TIE PRFLNE CF ALL OMM V"MM 1PoE GFECiE6. 3 N1N M OF TIED OW A EI'EC.M TM 6TMU ON6TMMM {16!19 NO LE66 T" TWO -NCH BY Tit-t" LIMER OF Q~ POD, LFRoff FOM j Of LM A 1•MMM CP CM VMT ANCHORED N GPPJV AV ifAiF1: FELT AMW OITMNm. "ONT C s M COMM OF WOW FEET APART. H6>rdt MAL PALS AM TO BE COILY IWW IWO NO LM6 TEAK L! ML B i16'J�IR YY ATTA AW TO '1fNI0. CF THE IP MHT P 06T. THE COM'OINY DEmA w b 0 MANNED, B ON" MUN N MAAM IMR A L 00DDTR6IWICH ACTI VW 6 INNO&M. THE AMA M MOFlflMW MY to b m ACTMTY OWNS G"MC M NATM1 aFaaNO cm= Alm Nt e)MVW t" R 6MJ111F "THWCLLTIIOUI omflal m*t vcVTC MOVIT 6Y'f0261TAY in "Vv" "Ftwom • C0 WRY DEVELCFP M COORDNATOR P1ATT 6F ECM fVV0 W 4BM OE oVNM CF TEE 3. m DT 17NALAL LA6dA UT6ASIN6 MAND 700LE OR BY CQIEIt APPRDVID 1'E1H1000� WEED PROTMTWE BARRIER ALL &WAGE TORE04 MATERIAL z TRVM OR OEB/O6 6R W.L TEE MWMaMAoAFllRMMCT"aplMM MLq MO 6UCN MAIE3NIAL aRLFttER 6HAI,L CT AMMA TIDLaLFhOftA6MCAI46o11D1' 00ITAAeCaPBTFekfIONMA1DtlAL6lAMtle t< O 1071!8 ATTaCGf91t'D CF ANT' INa 611ALL AITACLED ib ANY PIIE778GTED 1f1M OIt PAl1t Wr UMPSOMrAYMMEORCAMETOME EEXMAVW.MLEYMFI MTIMFRONDMON F a AMY PROlEC, IM OR PALM M 70 PIMC714 CWnCAL PIMTZME GF THE TFM FWOMCW BY tM 6WW?4 AND 8001 6UOFi 17 @A. z W LAA R F WYECIFD TTSE6 EO THAT THE CMTCAL ROOT ZCDE016 DtJ11PBED OR OEM fVoMS MAT BE YTM b PROVDm BT 11E CITY GP CLEAIiN1Eit. llY&PC EMM TO TIM POLLGVM9 ANDOMMYWAL TOCINUM 0 IMAM W. U EE Am11il W- AFFECW MWM MET BE 6EVOW BY CLEAN FMM an AT THE F06R FWM 80016 CAN BE PRAM 8T Mum 1q cum ft» pommEA MM THIN ICE t � F7WNA 1eaOt6 m1H a rlaNm -n eauy oiw e�w oTe arkae Fsaud�+en DFS>a� rnFe TRet LU J U HE CRMOAL ROOT ZAE TWAT ILL BE MAOTED W CONSTAXI M "At ME PADW TO A VEP. CF ID! Q1 M THE DEPiN CR D16TRNiMNOE P LE661WN1 B N1OIiE0 FTi7F111E E106TNS 6RAD8. DE71 0 M DOTAL= IITMN TIE CRMCAL ROOT ZO a TTE ROOT FONNL REIAMMIM MAY BE OWWVM *ELM OR VIEGMMI. DORM b OFF-06ED TO CM 1MDIpMYa IL BMEDIW CP F'R01MhV TP M THE F'RORR T16NM9 TEO#Mft AS M WAND 1l PVK MST 0 CUM "t WOW THE BRAMCTF COLLAR)AND /LOT CUTE MM TIMT LEAW A 6M CN TIE 1� A ANY IM THAT MAO WM 14PRO WLY PRAM G L NOT W PEOMO E]! b A IM LEFT CH TIO " CC COM AND TTE tOM OU NOT BB UTLM TO tW TM REFLACM6R REf O14MRA S 1 1 -TOTAL TlM TO M 169'10= atr OBM -M 116E61 IMP W POOR COIOITION TWLT DO NOT 1 gam OMP=AC01W 2W Mw IM1InIaI 40) TF M PM*NW N A COMM z 1 w Z MAT 169M fERACRIM Of A ME BT TM EE DAM AS VEfM"M ,oTAL onRe err Oe„ ?RU DRIP LRLE �{ BY CITY OF CLEAM AlM REPMITA1Wfi_ jw pm JS _ a a VMTM TIM TO BE %M=ATED Ulm P PRO'TECTWN p F wsTNn oac TIe�6 BARMEiR (TYP.) RECEIVED Emim PN1T TTEE6 dBl 4' 6OEF 6W Alm lH/4' LIVE CYK .YIN• 11BM 10 z I O 6ATI6FY IM �LACEMIT 1620010M UMPSOMrAYMMEORCAMETOME CITY OF CLEARWATER F a AMY PROlEC, IM OR PALM NOT, im •� -w —�.v -T. -4 ATE To RE va ED R z 1 w ,oTAL onRe err Oe„ ?RU DRIP LRLE l7YP.I w a a warm TPM TD eE RBTVIrm VMTM TIM TO BE %M=ATED Ulm P PRO'TECTWN p F wsTNn oac TIe�6 BARMEiR (TYP.) RECEIVED Emim PN1T TTEE6 APR 0 2 2007 z I � _ UMPSOMrAYMMEORCAMETOME CITY OF CLEARWATER F a AMY PROlEC, IM OR PALM _ ( 6LIiiROFl12STF f AFRAI - z W LAA YTM b PROVDm BT 11E CITY GP CLEAIiN1Eit. llY&PC f EkLIPF MR 11E IWVVAL OP HAZARDOUS t TN�6 O1H ��T iD DkEAtE,1tlBGT NOT, im •� -w —�.v -T. -4 ATE To RE va ED R PROJECT A 0 40 E 0472536 SHIFT NUN GRAPF/C SCALE L101 z DATE (1! 3/29/0 W w a a W W ORIGINAL CC RECEIVED � o APR 0 2 2007 z J PLA14NING DEPARTMENT _ oz ° W CITY OF CLEARWATER = � a W z W LAA a of z LU J U = U 3_ Z PROJECT A 0 40 E 0472536 SHIFT NUN GRAPF/C SCALE L101 z DATE 3/29/0 °s � E SF 1; g a Ili b B Q b � k � M � � O yD x J g owl"il: B! an CML v al _6 al � ak �4a 3r � x 2C "BISILITT - TPoANGLE (T1r.) vpaw tRrw wa" rs�,��rrr�aasr SARe PALM LIFITABI 48 NOWII 8E"i= ICU DM CAM 1- 800 - 432 -4770 E nv THE LAW IN R.ORDIII E FL NXME b6 WI (I=) EAII�ES WL OF 2 an m WIL of S arts NOTICE BE FOX YOU EGCIM(AM PLANT SCAEDULE REQUIRED: 10% OF GROSS VEHICULAR USE AREA (145,525 REQUIRED, EACH TREE SPECIES SHALL PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF S.F.) SHALL BE PROVIDED IN AN ISLAND, TEN (10) PERCENT OF THE TOTAL NUMBER OF PROPOSED, (16,7110 S.F.) OF INTERIOR ISLANDS EXCEEDS TREES. m= cm evtANK& C422M G= CAL 8BL Gm 821-Am WITH (145) PROPOSED TREES THERE ARE (7) OU SPECIES PROVIDED. (3 PALMS-1 TREE, 2 ACCENT L-P—b—y b�a- r t.Jr r.t.,re &w. t*Kw F.G. ru 10--1r MMI BI... 17 REQUIRED. TEN (10) PERCENT OF THE TOTAL NUMBER OF ISLANDS -40 TREES, 79 PALMS, AND A" SHRUBS. LM L.eUrwww bO. VW*ftre' MNtt -TrvM/ M.MNr 0+ Mr-0. PA. r40 W -17 eVW Mw. 71 //0 LS UVLrrr wymidrY. S.rwet Tun FA. 4'CN W -W Irr M MATERIAL WHERE IT 15 IN CONTACT WITH THE TREE AND THE REQUIRED, (2 ACCENT TREES) . i SHAME TREE; NO MORE THAN 01 tA..Lw TL"O't1.. S w— LIN 0.1, FA. 41Gn W -W Hr N TOTALS (12) PERCENT OF TOTAL TREES REQUIRED. OVA Utr Pr~I. •At%W ANee LA bwk On FA. a'CM 12• -N Nr 17 MUST BE GENERALLY INDIGENOUS TO THE LOCALE. SOIL MUST PAV1 T7,LH G= 0771NCAL ( C= CAL on 6= R@fSi&f - IRRIGATION SYSTEMS CONNECTED TO THE PUBLIC OM POTABLE WATER SUPPLY SYSTEM SHALL INCLUDE A G" rN,r.tte PUN l tY - PA. - V Cr. MIN. 49 NECESSARY TO INCREASE THE WATER RETENTION CAPABILITIES OIBC OF SOILS IN ORDER TO REDUCE THE AMOUNT OF WATERING H m vw. rdNt. Mdm. Pm Pet. PA. - V CT. MIN. a[ DURING PERIODS OF SUFFICIENT RAINFALL. swum cm THAT CROWN DEVELOPMENT 15 NOT INHIBITED. WITHIN THE DRIPLINES OF EXISTING TREES UNLESS (BIZ BITE MAINTAINED TO ALLOW UNOBSTRUCTED PASSAGE OF Q= lF3fa8KS PEDESTRIANS, O HM abl— •Fwt PNrr Tort toy—e• TIMA.0 Mte.. 3 4 L aw - GrzcrNt cA DRIVE BUFFER (954 LF) fb REQUIRED, 10' MIN. WIDE BUFFER. ONE (1) TREE PER 35 0 M M— e.&- •Nw GIWW Rd Inn • 4w I,~ INTERSECTIONS, NO STRUCTURE OR LANDSCAPING MAY BE M7 INSTALLED WHICH WILL OBSTRUCT VIEWS AT A LEVEL BETWEEN O RI I *hiw -PNrf k o. Irdl- W.Ah— p 1169tM` REQUIRED, 12' MIN. WIDE BUFFER. ONE (1) TREE PER 35 221 L,F. WITH 1009 SHRUBS TO REACH 6' WITHIN O w yt— eM.e.r. "Aw. tAYu..rn low 96-.W BY THE CITY OF CLEARWATER. 217 Qv1 vu...x... ed- t4. 3— S,,.A Vaw•..e ! pl 2w4w P11 GRW.ND cetm am OedHCdl GCa2.'►21 G= an ox 6[iiBL4S0 w =-Ate Nn..im V-kg" rl- LIM 1 9M 20- q'Ar tY aW LrNM YwI, t t...l.fe 1 Sew 241 N Ire * - 2% LlMr .,.a.,. I%* MAI, 3 000 W K. w NT Mt, 31 0 TA TrWhAW — dIU— Adetk -h—" I 9 2P c -r" iDl A P` APR ALL rA0PMW PLANT MAZER LAL 61" BE FLORIDA GRAM '1 OR DETIER • SEX-am-1_N» REQUIRED: 10% OF GROSS VEHICULAR USE AREA (145,525 REQUIRED, EACH TREE SPECIES SHALL PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF S.F.) SHALL BE PROVIDED IN AN ISLAND, TEN (10) PERCENT OF THE TOTAL NUMBER OF PROPOSED, (16,7110 S.F.) OF INTERIOR ISLANDS EXCEEDS TREES. REQUIREMENT OF (14,552 S.F,) PROPOSED, THE MINIMUM OF ANY ONE SPECIES OF TREE IS REQUIRED, TREES /PLANTS WITHIN NTERIOR ISLANDS (17) LIVE OAK WHICH IS APPROXIMATELY (10) - ONE (1) TREEASO SQUARE FEET OF RFAUJRED PERCENT OF THE TOTAL (145) TREES PROVIDED. GREENSPACE.. ONE TREE PER ISLAND MINIMUM. WITH (145) PROPOSED TREES THERE ARE (7) - SHRUBS. TO COVER MINIMUM 504 REQUIRED SPECIES PROVIDED. (3 PALMS-1 TREE, 2 ACCENT GREFNSPACE. TREES -1 TREE) PROPOSED- INTERIOR ISLAND (16,780 ST) - PROPOSED TREES/PLANTS WITHIN INTERIOR REQUIRED. TEN (10) PERCENT OF THE TOTAL NUMBER OF ISLANDS -40 TREES, 79 PALMS, AND A" SHRUBS. TREES SHALL BE OF A SPECIES WHICH EXHIBITS - TREES WHICH ARE BALLED AND BURLAPPED MUST HAVE THE CONSPICUOUS FLOWERS, BURLAP REMOVED OR FOLDED DtOAN AT THE TIME OF PLANTING. ALL TWINE OR ROPE MUST Be REMOVED. IF WIRE PROPOSED (40) CRAPE MYRTLE TO BE INSTALLED WHICH 15 A BASKETS ARE USED, THE UPPER ROWS MUST BE CUT BEFORE TOTAL OF (10) PERCENT OF ALL PROPOSED TREES, PLANTING. IF STAKES OR GUY WIRES ARE USED TO SUPPORT A (2 ACCENT TREES-1 TREE) TREE, THE WIRE MUST BE COVERED WITH PROTECTIVE MATERIAL WHERE IT 15 IN CONTACT WITH THE TREE AND THE REQUIRED, (2 ACCENT TREES) . i SHAME TREE; NO MORE THAN STAKES OR GUY WIRES MUST BE REMOVED AFTER ONE YEAR 259 OF REQUIRED TREES MAY BE ACCENT. - LANDSCAPING SMALL BE INSTALLED N A MANNER WHICH MINIMIZES CONFLICTS BETWEEN THE LANDSCAPING AND SIGNAGE PROPOSED: (40) ACCENT TREES (Lf 1) PROPOSED WHICH AND UTILITIES. TOTALS (12) PERCENT OF TOTAL TREES REQUIRED. - NO PARKING, DISPLAY OF VEHLES IC OR OUTDOOR STORAGE OR DISPLAY OF MERCHANDISE t5 PERMITTED IN OR OVER IRRIGATION REQUIRED LANDSCAPED AREA. REQUIRED - AN AUTOMATIC PERMANENT IRRIGATION SYSTEM - SOIL IN WHICH REQUIRED LANDSCAPING 15 TO BE INSTALLED PROVIDING COMPLETE WATER COVERAGE FOR ALL MUST BE GENERALLY INDIGENOUS TO THE LOCALE. SOIL MUST REQUIRED AND OTHER LANDSCAPING MATERIALS BE LOOSE, FRIABLE AND FREE OF LIMESTONE AND OTHER 51,44LL 13E PROVIDED AND MAINTAINED AS A FULLY CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS, RQADBIASE MATERIAL, ROCKS, FUNCTIONING SYSTEM IN ORDER TO PRESERVE THE WEEDS, GRASSES, HARDPAN CLAY OR OTHER DEBRIS. SOIL PH LANDSCAPING IN A HEALTHY GROWING CONDITION. SHALL BE ADJUSTED WHERE NECESSARY TO BE COMPATIBLE - IRRIGATION SYSTEMS CONNECTED TO THE PUBLIC WITH THE PLANT SPECIES BEING INSTALLED. BACKfILL SOIL POTABLE WATER SUPPLY SYSTEM SHALL INCLUDE A MATERIAL SHALL BE THOROUGHLY WATERED IN AND AROUND BACKFLOW PREVENTER AT THE SERVICE ROOT BALLS TO PREVENT ANY AIR POCKETS. THE USE OF CONNECTION. AMENDED AND €NRICHED SOILS MAY Of REQUIRED WHERE - IRRIGATION SYSTEM SHALL DE INSTALLED 50 AS NECESSARY TO INCREASE THE WATER RETENTION CAPABILITIES TO MINIMIZE SPRAY UPON ANY IMPERVIOUS OF SOILS IN ORDER TO REDUCE THE AMOUNT OF WATERING SURFACE, SUCH AS SIDEWALKS AND PAVED AREAS, NEEDED TO MEET THE LANDSCAPING WATERING REQUIREMENTS. - IRRIGATION SYSTEM SHALL INCLUDE A RAIN - REQUIRED SHADE TREES PLANTED SHALL NOT BE TOPPED, SENSOR/SHUT OFF DEVICE TO AVOID IRRIGATION SHAPED OR SEVERELY PRUNED, BUT MUST BE ALLOWED TO DURING PERIODS OF SUFFICIENT RAINFALL. GROW TO MATURITY AND ATTAIN THEIR NATURAL FORM SO - UNDERGROUND IRRIGATION SHALL BE INSTALLED THAT CROWN DEVELOPMENT 15 NOT INHIBITED. WITHIN THE DRIPLINES OF EXISTING TREES UNLESS - ALL LANDSCAPING NEAR PUBLIC SIDEWALKS MUST BE ROOT PROTECTION MEASURES ARE PROVIDED. MAINTAINED TO ALLOW UNOBSTRUCTED PASSAGE OF - IF AVAILABLE, RECLAIMED WATER SHALL BE PEDESTRIANS, USED FOR IRRIGATION PURPOSES. - DEAD, DECLINING, MISSING AND DISEASED PLANT MATERIAL SHALL BE REPLACED WITH HEALTHY MATERIAL OF SIMILAR PERIMETER SUFFERS CaRTICLF 3. 01V. {Z. SE 3 -1202 D) TYPE IN KEEPING WITH THE LANDSCAPING REQUIREMENTS AT - GrzcrNt cA DRIVE BUFFER (954 LF) THE TIME OF ORIGINAL PLANTING AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH REQUIRED, 10' MIN. WIDE BUFFER. ONE (1) TREE PER 35 THE APPROVED LANDSCAPE PLAN. SHRUBS. LFI WITH XEXI FIVE VE (5) EXISTING LIVE OAKS, TWO (2) EXISTING SABAL PALMS TO REMAIN, O ACCENT SIGHT V151BI IlY TRIANGLE (ARTI+I L„> c 3 DIV 9, SEC. 9 -W4 A) - TO MINIMIZE TRAFFIC HAZARDS AT STREET OR DRIVEWAY TREES AND N SHRUBS' INTERSECTIONS, NO STRUCTURE OR LANDSCAPING MAY BE NORTHERN BUFFER (225 LF) INSTALLED WHICH WILL OBSTRUCT VIEWS AT A LEVEL BETWEEN REQUIRED. 5' MN. WIDE B•UFF£R. ONE (I) TREE PER 35 L.F. (30) INCHES ABOVE' GRADE AND EIGHT (8) FEET ABOVE GRADE WITHIN THE SIGHT DISTANCE TRIANGLE. WITH 1009 SHRUBS. PROPOSED, 6 SWEET GUM, AND 57 SHRUBS, - EASTERN BUFFER (433 LE) 1,) SEE TREE INVENTORY PLAN (WOO) FOR EXISTING TREE REQUIRED, 12' MIN. WIDE BUFFER. ONE (1) TREE PER 35 DATA, 2.) SEE TREE PRESERVATION PLAN (LUM) FOR MITIGATION L,F. WITH 1009 SHRUBS TO REACH 6' WITHIN DETAILS. 744REE (3) YEARS, 3.) T4415 PROJECT 15 NOT LOCATED IN A SPECIAL AREA, OR PROPOSED. ONE (I) EXISTING SLASH PINE, TWO (2) SCENIC CORRIDER THAT CURRENTLY HAS AN ADOPTED PLAN EXISTING SWEET GUM TO REMAIN, THREE (3) BY THE CITY OF CLEARWATER. RELOCATED SABAL PALMS, 12 LIVE OAKS, 141 SHRUBS, 0 O AO w SCALE AS SHOWN U a i 3 °n k z s z 0 °I R S 9 m m x o c PALM PLANING DETAIL KTA DEBT PACE OF SH FWW N� riyRmG a t t REFER TO PLANT + t T 60t4EDULE_FOR SPACING + + + t AT BED EDGE NOTES, L TOP A TzBATLLi�. OF NG UP 2. PFiM ALL 8I RIBS TO ACHIEVE A UNFORM MAS6/NEIG14T 3.3' MINIMU'T OF PME BARK NUGGET MULCH OR AS 6PECFIED 4. EXCAVATE ENTIRE BED SPECIFIED FOR GIEDUDGOVER BED, S. ITdU ,UD GRADE (SEE GRADING 6. RPIE:PARED PLANTING SOIL AS SPECJFIED_ NOrM WHEN GROIM- �p�IRD Tp EBE IN M T. SGARfFYxR�pWlpTpALLSIDEO Q �� TT� SUBSOIL PLANT W WrAn. OECTICN VITA L CROWN MEDIANS • 4.1 SLOPES (OR AS SPECIFIED ON THE LANDSCAPE PLANSI 2• EXCAVATE A CONTINUOUS 24' DEEP Pit ~14 TOP OF CURD) FOIR ENTIRE LENGTH AND WIDTH OF ISLAND 4 BACffILL WITH APP- ROVED PLANTING SOIL MIX. SEE 202A OF SECTION 02WO OF PLANTING SPECIFICATIONS 3. WtOVtDE CONTINUOUS TDEEP ROOTY ROOT BARRIER (0)WEN SPEGFiEDA 4. PROTECT AND RETAIN ALL CUR66 AND BASE. S. PROVIDE 12' DEAD ZONE • CURB EDGES. 6. PROVIDE J' FROM TOP OF GARB TO RMOW GRADE TO ALLOW FOR 1 MULCH OR 600. PROVIDE 4' MN"JM TOPSOIL ABOVE COMPACTED SIDGRADE FOR SOD (TYP) COMPACTED SUBGRAPE TO REMAIN FOR STRUCTURAL SUPPORT OF CURB SYSTEM (TYPA GENERAL NOTES A VERIFY LOCATION OF ALL UTILIVE6 PRIOR TO ANY EXCAVATION ACTIVITY. B EXCAVATE ENTIRE AREA UPDER ALL 8HR'd@RBASROtlOGOV E W TFEEB. C. ALL MEDIANS SHALL UTILIZE POOR DRAINAGE DETAIL 044 PERCOLATION RATES ARE 2' PER HOUR OR LESS OR DO NOT MET LOCAL REM"IMMENTB. TYPICAL. L MOWA E hLEDIAN/ISLAW amcrm KTA L PROTECT TREE TRIM WITH 0'2-PLY BLACK R76BETR HOSE Z. DOUBLE STRAND GAUGE WIRE (NOTE FOR MULTI -TRUCK TREES, GUY TO STRONGEST T13IN . AT CMCINX COVEIMD WITH S' 2 -PLY BLACK R mam NOSE. !. TWO 6' COMMERCIAL GRADE T' - POST SPACED EVENLY AROUND TREE 4.3' MINIMUM OF PINE BARK NUGGET MULCH OR AA aMCFIED. S. SOIL BERI"I TO HOLD WATER 6. FINISHED GRAPE (SEE GRADING PLAN) T. TOP OF RO0T5ALL MIN. I' ABOVE FINISHED GRADE B. B N B OR CONTAINERIZED (SEE SPECFK'ATIONS FOR ROOT BALL REG)IRE]ME NTS). A PREPARED PLANTING SOIL AS SPECIFIED. 10. ROOTB,ALLS GREATER THAN 24' DIAMETER SHALL BE PLACED ON MORND OF 1UpIOTURBED SOIL TO PREVENIT SETTLING ROOTHALLS SMALLER THAN 24' N PIA MAY SIT ON COMPACTED EARTH. N07AL A CONTRACTOR SHALL ASSURE PERCOLATION OF ALL PLANTING PITS PRIOR TO NSTALLATION. B. FINAL STREE STAKING DETAIL6 AND PLACST1ENT TO BE APPROVED BY OWNER. G 'TREE SAVER' A)K.HORNG SYSTEM MAY BE SUBSTITUTED FOR T' -POST STAKING SYSTEM UPON APPROVAL BY OWNER OR LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT SMALL TREE PL1► MM DETAIL (w m um) offGTm N.TA L BASE OF TREE SHALL BE PLANTED SLIGHTLY ABOVE ADJACENT FINISH GRADE RAMOVE ALL TNNL• t STRAPS 1 CUT BURLAP MROM TOP 1/3 OF ROOTBALL. NO SYNTHETIC BURLAP WILL BE AGCEPIED. 2. 3' PINE BARK NUGGET MULCH 3. DIAMETER OF TREE PIT TO DE TWICE THE DIAMETLR Or ROOTBALL- ROUGHEN SDES GF TREE PIT. 4.3' HIGH SOIL 6AUCERN,IATER RING AROUND TREE. S. TOP601L MIX BACTO:ILL NOSE, IF SITE CONPITIOIS REQUIRE GLYNG OF THE TREE, GUYM DETAILS FROM SMALL TREE PLANTING SHALL BE USED_ MULTI -TRUING TREE PLANTM DETAIL 66CTION Nta. L FINISH GRADE 2. BApGILL WITH PREPARED PLANTING SOIL MIX At SPECIFIED. 3. FILTER CLOTH 4,12% CLEAN SAND. COMPACTED. ADJUST LAYER THICKNESS SO TOP OF RROOTBALL 16 AT EAST I' ABOVE FINISHED GRADE 5, SLOPE BOTTOM TO DRAIN •. WAALI'EIED HOLE PENETRATE THROUGH OCCLIDNG LAYER TO WATER TABLE OR TO A PEPTH OF T' TO ASSURE PROPER PERCOLATION T. BAGKFILL WITH IR' - 3/4' GRAVEL S, WATER TABLE FOR A PARKING ISLAND PLANTING SITUATION, CONTRACTOR TO BACIFILL ENTIRE LENGTH OF PLANTING AREA TO WITHIN 6. OF BACK OF CURB OIR EDGE O• PAVEMENT. POOR DRAINAGE CONDITION DIETAIL ON NTH. N� M Iloll� 6 TZ 14 II�� k' < z � p J a w 0 w Q U 0 Z bl L MNMIIM OF NINE (W bk2= GOOD PALM FRONDS A WASHNGTONIA q QD 2' PRNE AND TIE FF40ND6 PALMD SMLAR � WITH HEMP TONE' W/BOOTS INTACT. CAEIBACaE PALMS B. SEE FLANS AND TO BE UIRRICANE SPECS. FOR PALMS W/ I 3. 6 LAYERS OP BURLAP 50076 TO MMIAN 011 W TO PROTECT TRJNK TRAM: 4. F1VE 1" X 4' X16' WOOD C. F 6T 9 o 6. SECU/E BATTENS WITH 2- PROVED BYA - 4 TO HOOLLDBATTENNSS I r%.AACE. D. CONTRACTOR SHALL OF: F'ER:OLATION OF ALL Opt TO PIT'S PRIOR TO B INTO PALM. 1$KaHT OF BATTENS SMALL BE RJBTALLATWt�L C7 LOCATED N RELATION Na TO THE 1EIG14T OF THE PALM FOR ADEG)ATE BRACING OVERALL PALM HEIGHT (MEASURED 6.5-2* X 4'x a' TO TOP OF BUD) NAIL (DRILL AND NAIL F CLEAR T NECESSARY) TO 064TTENS fTfEABtRED TO AND 2' X 4' STAKES, FLAG BOTTOM OF AT MIDPONT AND AT BASE. LEAF SHEATHS) a 1. PROVIDE RAGGING GRAY a.3' SPECIFIED MULCH eNEEASI.�TO g S. BERM 601L TO HOLD WATER TOP OF HARDENED 10. FN16H GRADE TRiNK) IL 2' X 4' X 24' (MN.) EPARED LA N 6 12 PLANTING G M.. SOIL AS 0MCIFIED PALM PLANING DETAIL KTA DEBT PACE OF SH FWW N� riyRmG a t t REFER TO PLANT + t T 60t4EDULE_FOR SPACING + + + t AT BED EDGE NOTES, L TOP A TzBATLLi�. OF NG UP 2. PFiM ALL 8I RIBS TO ACHIEVE A UNFORM MAS6/NEIG14T 3.3' MINIMU'T OF PME BARK NUGGET MULCH OR AS 6PECFIED 4. EXCAVATE ENTIRE BED SPECIFIED FOR GIEDUDGOVER BED, S. ITdU ,UD GRADE (SEE GRADING 6. RPIE:PARED PLANTING SOIL AS SPECJFIED_ NOrM WHEN GROIM- �p�IRD Tp EBE IN M T. SGARfFYxR�pWlpTpALLSIDEO Q �� TT� SUBSOIL PLANT W WrAn. OECTICN VITA L CROWN MEDIANS • 4.1 SLOPES (OR AS SPECIFIED ON THE LANDSCAPE PLANSI 2• EXCAVATE A CONTINUOUS 24' DEEP Pit ~14 TOP OF CURD) FOIR ENTIRE LENGTH AND WIDTH OF ISLAND 4 BACffILL WITH APP- ROVED PLANTING SOIL MIX. SEE 202A OF SECTION 02WO OF PLANTING SPECIFICATIONS 3. WtOVtDE CONTINUOUS TDEEP ROOTY ROOT BARRIER (0)WEN SPEGFiEDA 4. PROTECT AND RETAIN ALL CUR66 AND BASE. S. PROVIDE 12' DEAD ZONE • CURB EDGES. 6. PROVIDE J' FROM TOP OF GARB TO RMOW GRADE TO ALLOW FOR 1 MULCH OR 600. PROVIDE 4' MN"JM TOPSOIL ABOVE COMPACTED SIDGRADE FOR SOD (TYP) COMPACTED SUBGRAPE TO REMAIN FOR STRUCTURAL SUPPORT OF CURB SYSTEM (TYPA GENERAL NOTES A VERIFY LOCATION OF ALL UTILIVE6 PRIOR TO ANY EXCAVATION ACTIVITY. B EXCAVATE ENTIRE AREA UPDER ALL 8HR'd@RBASROtlOGOV E W TFEEB. C. ALL MEDIANS SHALL UTILIZE POOR DRAINAGE DETAIL 044 PERCOLATION RATES ARE 2' PER HOUR OR LESS OR DO NOT MET LOCAL REM"IMMENTB. TYPICAL. L MOWA E hLEDIAN/ISLAW amcrm KTA L PROTECT TREE TRIM WITH 0'2-PLY BLACK R76BETR HOSE Z. DOUBLE STRAND GAUGE WIRE (NOTE FOR MULTI -TRUCK TREES, GUY TO STRONGEST T13IN . AT CMCINX COVEIMD WITH S' 2 -PLY BLACK R mam NOSE. !. TWO 6' COMMERCIAL GRADE T' - POST SPACED EVENLY AROUND TREE 4.3' MINIMUM OF PINE BARK NUGGET MULCH OR AA aMCFIED. S. SOIL BERI"I TO HOLD WATER 6. FINISHED GRAPE (SEE GRADING PLAN) T. TOP OF RO0T5ALL MIN. I' ABOVE FINISHED GRADE B. B N B OR CONTAINERIZED (SEE SPECFK'ATIONS FOR ROOT BALL REG)IRE]ME NTS). A PREPARED PLANTING SOIL AS SPECIFIED. 10. ROOTB,ALLS GREATER THAN 24' DIAMETER SHALL BE PLACED ON MORND OF 1UpIOTURBED SOIL TO PREVENIT SETTLING ROOTHALLS SMALLER THAN 24' N PIA MAY SIT ON COMPACTED EARTH. N07AL A CONTRACTOR SHALL ASSURE PERCOLATION OF ALL PLANTING PITS PRIOR TO NSTALLATION. B. FINAL STREE STAKING DETAIL6 AND PLACST1ENT TO BE APPROVED BY OWNER. G 'TREE SAVER' A)K.HORNG SYSTEM MAY BE SUBSTITUTED FOR T' -POST STAKING SYSTEM UPON APPROVAL BY OWNER OR LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT SMALL TREE PL1► MM DETAIL (w m um) offGTm N.TA L BASE OF TREE SHALL BE PLANTED SLIGHTLY ABOVE ADJACENT FINISH GRADE RAMOVE ALL TNNL• t STRAPS 1 CUT BURLAP MROM TOP 1/3 OF ROOTBALL. NO SYNTHETIC BURLAP WILL BE AGCEPIED. 2. 3' PINE BARK NUGGET MULCH 3. DIAMETER OF TREE PIT TO DE TWICE THE DIAMETLR Or ROOTBALL- ROUGHEN SDES GF TREE PIT. 4.3' HIGH SOIL 6AUCERN,IATER RING AROUND TREE. S. TOP601L MIX BACTO:ILL NOSE, IF SITE CONPITIOIS REQUIRE GLYNG OF THE TREE, GUYM DETAILS FROM SMALL TREE PLANTING SHALL BE USED_ MULTI -TRUING TREE PLANTM DETAIL 66CTION Nta. L FINISH GRADE 2. BApGILL WITH PREPARED PLANTING SOIL MIX At SPECIFIED. 3. FILTER CLOTH 4,12% CLEAN SAND. COMPACTED. ADJUST LAYER THICKNESS SO TOP OF RROOTBALL 16 AT EAST I' ABOVE FINISHED GRADE 5, SLOPE BOTTOM TO DRAIN •. WAALI'EIED HOLE PENETRATE THROUGH OCCLIDNG LAYER TO WATER TABLE OR TO A PEPTH OF T' TO ASSURE PROPER PERCOLATION T. BAGKFILL WITH IR' - 3/4' GRAVEL S, WATER TABLE FOR A PARKING ISLAND PLANTING SITUATION, CONTRACTOR TO BACIFILL ENTIRE LENGTH OF PLANTING AREA TO WITHIN 6. OF BACK OF CURB OIR EDGE O• PAVEMENT. POOR DRAINAGE CONDITION DIETAIL ON NTH. N� M Iloll� 6 TZ 14 II�� k' < z � p J a w 0 w Q U 0 Z bl L103 a . o q QD ORIGINAL � W REGf'IVF _ f` W ApV R 0 2 2007 APR W ca Z W z PLMNiNC DEPARTMENT o CITY OF CLEARWATER < In U C7 L103 cu 11� N r n- T", — L —------- - ------- L-------------------- 5------- ------- ao Drive OWGINAL RE('iNFI) APR 02 2007 PW4NiNG DiPARiMEN'f CITY OF CLEARWATER Plant Legend IN= 0 mom C.U." C'm. rv"ts. 0 rwft! T_%w a...* Fl- 0 EAU M= 0 cam= E) P1.6 /f F_ P.!— GQHM '".' IN— T" 0 Otd Boa 0 CAWLem-raum Vft- cd2=m 'N Wal-Mart Clearwater SCAI f: 114 FT f F 0 ill 2S sf) (�) WAL*MART (D)AUT&L'L:LN"X"E'S'OOL'M'U'OGOR'OUP, 2007 PP- = Fj IWIey-ftn bb� and Assoaales, Inc. Landscape Plan City of Clearwater, Florida URBAN RESOURCE GROUP . 0;`S:04 01 AsiociAr" 1k, I APPENDIX i TREE C 9. fIDIT14fl tVALUATI °fl Fg. ftM TREE CONDITION EVALUATION FORM A tree's condition is determined from the sum of the condition points established from the rating of a tree's roots, trunk, limb/branch structure, twigs and foliage. The condition ratings range from excellent to poor and are determined by a condition point system that weights problems identified on each component of the tree. The condition point system is structured as follows: no apparent problems (4 points), minor problems (3 points), mWor problems (2 points) and extreme problems (1 point). ROOTS • Root anchorage • Restricted root system relative to canopy • Mechanical injury • Girdling roots • Compaction or water - logged roots • Presence of insects or diseases Condition points TRUNK • Sound bark and wood, no cavities • Upright trunk (well tapered) • Included bark between codominant stems • Mechanical or fire injury • Cracks • Swollen or sunken area • Presence of insect and disease Condition points LIMB AND BRANCH STRUCTURE • Strong attachments, no included bark • Free of decay and cavities • Well proportioned, good form • Wound closure • Dead limbs/epicormic sprouting • Presence of decay, insects and diseases Condition points TWIGS • Shoot vigor compared to past 3 -year growth • Presence of weak or dead twigs • Presence of insects and diseases Condition points FOLIAGE • Normal appearance (size, color, density) • Nutrient deficiencies • Herbicidal, chemical injury symptoms • Wilted or dead leaves • Presence of insect or diseases Condition points Total Condition Points TREE CONDITION RANKING (The ranking does not incorporate a wood density evaluation of the root collar and includes an evaluation of the tree's canopy from the ground surface only) Total Points Condition 18 -20 Excellent 15 -17 Good 12 -14 Fair 11 or less Poor 'ORIGINAL RECHE WD APR 0 2 2007 PLA'if iif iG' DEPARYMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER APPENDIX 5 TREE SUMMITRY SPREADSKET TREE CONDITION EVALUATION TREE # Species DBH Circumference Height Spread Tree Condition Ranking Status 1 Live Oak 20 63 35 45 Fair Removed 2 Live Oak 17 53 35 39 Fair Removed 3 Live Oak 15 47 23 36 Fair Removed 4 Live Oak 13 41 26 34 Poor 5 Live Oak 13 41 23 30 Poor —Removed Removed 6 Cabbaqe Palm 14 44 14 15 Excellent Remain 7 Cabbage Palm 15 47 17 15 Excellent Remain 8 Cabbage Palm 15 47 14 15 Excellent. Remain 9 Cabbage Palm 12 38 7 15 Excellent Remain 10 Cabbaqe Palm 12 38 2 Is Excellent Remain 11 Live Oak 11 35 24 29 Fair Removed 12 Slash Pine 14 44 60 25 Good Removed 13 Slash Pine 15 47 63 23 Good Remain 14 Slash Pine 15 47 61 24 Good Remain 15 Slash Pine 19 60 62 22 Good Remain 16 Slash Pine 11 35 62 10 Good Remain 17 Slash Pine 14 44 66 24 Good Remain 18 Slash Pine 14 44 68 25 Good Remain 19 Live Oak 17 53 30 37 Fair Removed 20 Live Oak 18 57 37 44 Fair Removed 21 Live Oak 15 47 35 42 Poor Removed 22 Live Oak 15 47 35 36 Fair Removed 23 Live Oak 13 41 20 25 Fair Removed 24 Live Oak 13 41 26 25 Good Removed 25 Live Oak 15 47 30 33 Good Remain 26 Live Oak 11 35 27 28 Fair Remain 27 Live Oak 14 44 32 29 Fair Remain 28 Live Oak 12 38 33 30 Fair Remain 29 Live Oak 11 35 31 29 Fair Remain 30 Live Oak 14 44 27 33 Fair Removed 31 Live Oak 13 41 30 27 Fair Removed 32 Live Oak 11 35 24 28 Fair Removed 33 Live Oak 10 31 18 25 Poor Removed 34 Live Oak 14 44 26 32 Poor Removed 35 Live Oak 13 41 27 33 Poor Removed 36 Live Oak 12 38 24 27 Fair Removed 37 Live Oak 14 44 29 34 Fair Removed 38 Live Oak 15 47 25 29 Fair Removed 39 Live Oak 16 50 31 32 Fair Removed 40 Live Oak 16 50 39 33 Fair Removed 41 Live Oak 15 47 34 32 Fair Removed 42 Live Oak 15 47 27 34 Poor Removed 43 Live Oak 12 38 27 33 Poor Removed- 44 Live Oak 9 28 18 24 Fair Removed 45 Live Oak 9 28 20 23 Poor Removed 46 Live Oak 15 47 25 32 Poor Removed 47 Live Oak 20 63 36 40 Fair Removed 48 Live Oak 19 60 37 46 Poor Removed 49 Live Oak 17 53 33 39 Poor Removed 50 Live Oak 13 41 28 32 Fair Removed 51 Live Oak 11 35 33 32 Fair Removed 52 Live Oak 12 38 26 34 Fair Removed 53 Live Oak 10 31 27 26 Poor Removed 54 Cabbage Palm 12 38 20 15 Excellent Relocated 55 Cabbage Palm 10 31 20 15 Excellent Relocated 56 Live Oak 12 38 27 31 Fair Removed 57 Live Oak 16 50 28 33 Fair Removed 58 Live Oak 28 22 24 Fair Removed 59 Live Oak 14 44 28 30 Fair Removed 60 Cabbage Palm 12 38 20 15 Excellent Relocated 61 Cabbage Palm 9 28 20 15 Excellent Relocated 62 Cabbaoe Palm 11 35 19 15 Excellent Relocated 63 Cabbage Palm 12 38 18 15 Excellent Relocated 64 Laurel oak 13 41 24 31 Poor Removed 65 Cabbage Palm 13 41 5 15 Excellent Remain 66 Live Oak 14 44 28 37 Fair Removed 67 Cabbaqe Palm 16 50 6 15 Excellent 68 Live Oak 13 41 29 35 Fair —Remain Removed -69 Live Oak-- 13 41 28 35 -Fair Rerrlove6 70 Live Oak 9 28 24 26 Fair Removed 71 Live Oak 8 25 22 22 Fair Removed 72 Live Oak 8 25 21 22 Poor Removed 73 Chinese Elm 8 25 19 20 Fair Removed 74 Tree Not on Site - - - - 75 Cabbaae Palm 18 57 9 15 Good Remain 76 Live Oak 13 41 26 Fair Remain 77 Water Oak 10 31 26 20 Poor Removed 78 Water Oak - - 43 41 Fair Remain 79 Formosa Sweet um 13 41 38 19 Good Remain 80 Slash Pine 18 57 62 32 Good Remain 81 Formosa Sweet um 14 44 41 25 Good Remain 82 Live Oak 28 88 51 62 Good Remain 83 Water Oak 14 44 38 48 Fair Removed 84 Slash Pine 19 60 65 42 Good Remain 85 Water Oak 13 41 32 47 Poor Removed 86 Cabbage Palm 9 28 16 15 Excellent Relocated 87 Carolina Laurel Cherry 25 25 Excellent Remain 88 Jacaranda 40 26 Excellent Remain 89 Jacaranda 47 47 Excellent Remain IMP 0 _z z -0 fT I ;L, C= C= M Z L, APPENDIX G EXISTING TREE Pfd °T°GRAFMS ��- INI 7 -7100 r. Z ""' $•:yt' ." k it � �' Qxt PAN a 11 I? C- [ l Kiar � __ NA®oop &s, tic ORIGINAL REC,�IVFD AN 421001 plANNING Dry r CITY OF CIEA WATER sfraaft n rR i WAVMARI V Ar 1 TRUS 6 - GEC's =4 . URBAN RESOURCE GROUP TRt[ 12 ORIGINAL RE( -lVFD APR 02 2007 PLANNiNG DEPtiGt KENT CITY OF CLEARWATER re sErvati n -'Er WVAI-MAH I (I I A-, A-11W H E VJ rl TR tT 15 URBAN RE50URCF GROUP w'�� TRtt 13 ORIGINAL REC*FIVFD OR 022007 PLANNING DEPAKMiNt CITY OF CLEARWATER Iff WAVIAART CLEARWATER TRU, 16 I mivmi� 12 MM n KWI"=- k . URBAN RESOURCE GROUP TRU ORIGINAL RECIFIVED "R 0 2 2007 Pb NNING DipAk-IMENT OF CLEARWATER TFxtt 19 YE sErvatl n wAE•MAH7 CEEARWAT114 F ilrt C I'' "^�A�te,lA,�` eUI1l6. r URBAN RESOURCE GROUP all ORIGINAL RE011VEQ QDR 0 2 2007 OLANNING MNAWMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER YF IEIrUQ.t ti -In rmm n_ = 11 URBAN RESOURCE GROUP TRU 25 ORIGINAL REC'f-IVFD AD'R 0 2 2007 PLANAING DEPARiMENT CITY OF CLEARWATEp --- - --- -- ------------- -- -- ------------------------------------------------------- TR_Q__ -jrt7sirvai mort TRU 26 a%* ClMn Kllw,,,W� m WAswoa&k URBAN RESOURCE GROUP ORIGINAL REC,I'IVFD t�.)R 0 2 2007 PUNNING DEPAW-IMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER rE smah A! %!-,� I I h -, 'A, A I � r, W. Emm" URBAN AES&UjC!Aj,0:UP Picture of Tree 29 unavailable RECtIVED APR 0 2 2007 PLANNING DilAR-1 IVIMT CITY OF CLEARWATER e cmmn ��in URBAN RESOURCE GROUP � dnlb d uMt9a rSn uo u�ttui�t. u� '-u'4'muvv UMMIMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER YFF sErvaii n W -NI - MAlk Ci i A,NAIl a F UY� ki TRtt 3 G ORIGINAL REC'LFIVFD C�C1 Inc APR 0 2 2001 URBAN RESOURCE GROUP PLANNING [iiPMJNENT CITY OF CLEARWATER tmmn =k URBAN RESOURCE GROUP .1- -.1. 1-,-.,..- 11-1.11, � DRIG1. NAL RECI-IVED VIR 02 2007 PLANNING DEIjAkIMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER ervat A DIVISION Of NIMIR- M ENO ISSOC1.0. IN(. YE SErvali n WnL-AAA T Cain -'. nitH E Ur iL Tftft 't rlmmn URBAN RESOURCE GROUP . 00000 0 IMMA "a me Owtu 1.W 7RIGINAL RE(!_!VED OR 0 2 2007 PLANNING DiF kiMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER ►, f14!� re e WOWAL-NAART CLFARWAT E H f V r( TKtt I Amocates, Inc URBAN RESOURCE GROUP TREE I ')RIGI.ML qEC�,'VFD VIR 022007 PLAivf,qjNG - L) - - cPAOVIENT CITY OF CLEARWATER 11 I --- - d -. N r TRUS W& � !tr�yttxi. � arrd Awodelas, Inc URBAN RESOURCE GROUP TR [r 5 3 - in, ORIGINAL RECC-!VED APR 02 2007 PLANNING DikAk-IMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER sErvat WAL-MA141 CI I A;. AI I J<EDurt -1111-6 "IP- A 00 COW "vdASlwlo"M&kx URBAN RESOURCE GROUP 55 AIGNAL RECt-'VF-D AN 0 2 2007 PL-kNNING DiVAklIVIENT CITY OF '-',LEApWATEIZ YEf sfrvati n , WAL -MA 1 C.II A -WAI(H E Vrt TKtt 58 LrgBAN RESOURCE GROUP TO 3R!GKAL RECI -IkIED APR 02 2007 PLANNING DivAklIVIENT CITY OF CLEARWATER rRrrs 60 64MOMM rF sCfr {aati n ViiAl•MAHI C.1 I AAV.1AI I H Fb(Ir� Elm" Kn n +ic f' R�� Inc PLANNING 6EPAizl91ENT CITY OF CLUARWATER URBAN RESOURCE GROUP P w F R YE SETUQ)ilki WAI-%I,NH!E jrt URBAN RESOURCE GROUP .--mug A, -w W.3"- APR 0 2 2007 PLANNING DiPAKiiVIFNT '0NTY OF CLEARWATFR JYE sErvati h _ =n k URBAN RESOURCE GROUP 1170 ORIGINAL REff- QED °R 0 2 2007 PLANNING I. CPARTNENT CITY OF CLEARWATER TR U5 71 re sErvati n W,�i- HI C I AN.vnu H F Lt s and kr— URBAN RESOURCE6ROUP LM (R1 V!: tl!'1l- RECTAIED "''R 02 2007 PUANNING DEPARTMENT "'ITV OF CUARWATER YE sErvati n rlmmn =kl URtAN RESOURCE GROUP TREE 78 ORIGM RECIUVED APR 02 2007 L m-- 7to up - 'frolum- PLANNING DEVAk-11VIENT CITY OF CLEARWATER W .I I-M+.H! C:I I A,AAII H ?"WING Dirt'A INIENT CITY OF CLEARWATER W Assooa & Inc. URBAN RESOURCE GROUP a ""y aowe.w — uw.lh,- saraati n Cand Assoca:es. Inc URBAN RESOURCE GROUP TREE ORIGINAL RECD:'VED - '? ) 2 2007 'L,-vrxuwG DEPAWWENT TREE 8 5 / 1YFservaf WA I.4.,"k1 L.I I A,, '0', 1! Et)vrt rmm" a Aseooela kr. URBAN RESOURCE GROUP i S.." MW1111 MbM— a Ww- WAL•MART CLEARWATER WAW MART 11-0 Erudi nd � and Assoaales, ]nc. URBAN RESOURCE GROUP C Parking Demand Study For Submittal to the City of Clearwater Parking Demand Study Wal *Mart Neighborhood Market City of Clearwater, Florida Prepared for: Wal*Mart Stores, Inc. Bentonville, Arkansas Prepared by: Kimley -Horn and Associates, Inc. Tampa, Florida ©Kimley -Horn and Associates, Inc. March 2007 047253651 ®� ® Kimley -Horn D and Associates, Inc. Aftl APR 0 9 2007 PLANNING ®EPAR -r SENT C17Y OF CI.EARWATER 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Parking Demand Study For Submittal to the City of Clearwater Parking Demand Study Wal *Mart Neighborhood Market City of Clearwater, Florida Prepared for: Wal *Mart Stores, Inc. - Bentonville, Arkansas Prepared by: Kimley -Horn and Associates,. Inc. Tampa, Florida • ��`� j' -� yam. 1J %S/1o'� ©Kimley -Horn and Associates, Inc. David -E. roemel, P E. 4 , 4 Pate March 2007 1016 Princess Palm Avenu- wY � 047253651 ama; Flo:ida 336 10 -8300 TuF5 PE Ni 7614 = CA 00'000696 The entirety of this report, including text and images, is property of Kimley -Horn and Associates, protected under U.S. copyright law. Ccip right0.2007, Kimley -Horn and Associates, Inc. IG ey -HOM WAssoaates, Im Parking Demand Study EXECUTIVE SUMMARY A parking demand study was performed for a proposed shopping center redevelopment, which _._ ----square consists of _a_ ±40,000 square foot Wal*Mart Neighborhood Market and approximately ±9,500 ' feet of additional specialty retail, to be located in the northeast quadrant of the intersection of North Highland Avenue & Greenlea Drive in the City of Clearwater, Florida. The existing Wal *Mart Neighborhood Market located in the northwest quadrant of Hillsborough Avenue & Elliot Drive, in Hillsborough County, Florida was used as the study site to determine the parking demands for the Wal *Mart Neighborhood Market located in the proposed shopping center redevelopment. Data was collected at the Wal *Mart Neighborhood Market study site for two weekdays (Tuesday and Thursday) and one Saturday, in 15- minute intervals for eight -hours (10:00 a.m..to 6:00 p.m.) of a typical day, to determine the peak 15- minute parking demands for the study site. The data collection and analysis procedures used for the study were conducted in accordance with the agreed upon study methodology, and parking demands for the existing and future specialty retail on the site was determined based upon the Institute of Transportation Engineers' (ITE) Parking Generation, 3rd Edition (2004). Based upon the data collected on the three days studied, parking demands for the Wal *Mart Neighborhood Market range from 1.39 to 1.71 for typical weekdays, and was determined to be 2.31 for a typical Saturday. For the specialty retail uses at the proposed shopping center, data contained in ITE Parking Generation, 3rd Edition (2004) for Land Use Code 820: Shopping Center was used to determine an average peak period parking demand for a typical weekday of 2.65 vehicles per 1,000 square feet, and an average peak period parking demand for a typical Saturday of 2.97 vehicles per 1,000 square feet. Parking demand for the proposed shopping center redevelopment was calculated based upon the number of proposed parking spaces and proposed floor area independently for, both the Wal *Mart Neighborhood Market and the specialty retail uses as well as for the overall shopping Report 030107.doc i March 2007 �� lGmley Hom and ASSOCIat6S, Inc. Parking Demand Study center. A peak weekday parking demand of 2.11 vehicles per 1,000 square feet, and a. peak weekend parking demand of 2.60 vehicles per 1,000 square feet were calculated for the total shopping center redevelopment. The site plan for the shopping center shows a maximum parking ratio of 4.68 available parking spaces per 1,000 square feet. Based upon the analysis provided, the proposed shopping center in the northeast quadrant of the intersection of North Highland Avenue & Greenlea Drive in the City of Clearwater, Florida is expected to provide adequate parking to meet the shopping center's parking demands. Report 030107.doc Il March 2007 i 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 C]Mn Wey Hom Akoeietes, Inc. Parking Demand Study TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................ ............................... INTRODUCTION...................................... ............................... STUDY METHODOLOGY ....................... ............................... DATA COLLECTION ............................... ............................... Existing Study Site Inventory ......... ............................... Parking Demand Data Collection ... ............................... Page .............. ............................... i ............... ..............................1 ............... ......................:.......2 ............... ..............................3 ............... ..............................3 ............... ..............:...............4 PARKINGDEMAND ................................................................................. ..............................5 Wal *Mart Neighborhood Market Parking Demands ..................... ..............................5 Specialty Retail Parking Demands ................................................... ..............................6 PARKINGSUPPLY .................................................................................... ..............................7 PARKINGANALYSIS ............................................................................... ..............................8 CONCLUSION............................................................................................ ..............................9 LIST OF TABLES TABLE 1: Study Site Parking Inventory ................ ............................... TABLE 2: Parking Demand Data Summary .......... ............................... TABLE 3: Existing Parking Demand Summary ..... ............................... TABLE 4: Proposed Parking Supply Summary ..... ............................... TABLE 5: Parking Supply and Demand Comparison ........................... Page ..............................3 .............................:4 ..............................5 ..............................7 .............................. 8 .Report 030107.doc iji March 2007 ❑�� tGmley::es','1 nc.' Parking Demand Study LIST OF APPENDICES APPENDIX A: Proposed Site Plan APPENDIX B: Methodology Statement APPENDIX C: Existing Study Site Plan APPENDIX D: Count Data and Parking Demands APPENDIX E: ITE Parking Generation 3rd Edition Parking Rates I Report 030107.doc iv March 2007 E n� —. t0mley -Hom Assa�ates, Inc. Parking Demand Study INTRODUCTION Kimley -Horn and Associates, Inc. has been retained to conduct a parking demand study for the proposed shopping center redevelopment, which consists of a ±40,000 square foot Wal *Mart Neighborhood Market and approximately ±9,500 square feet of additional specialty retail, to be located in the northeast quadrant of the intersection of North Highland Avenue & Greenlea Drive in the City of Clearwater, Florida. The existing shopping center is comprised of a Winn -Dixie store, which will be demolished and replaced by the proposed Wal *Mart Neighborhood Market, and specialty retail center. The Flexible Development Standards of the City of Clearwater allow for a parking ratio that is less than 5.0 spaces, but greater than 4.0 spaces, per 1,000 square feet of commercial retail space with the support of a parking demand study. Therefore, this parking demand study has been conducted to determine expected parking demand for the proposed site. A site location map of the proposed shopping center is provided in Appendix A. The study for conducting this parking demand study methodology was discussed and agreed upon with City of Clearwater staff on Thursday, February 8, 2007. The following report summarizes the analysis that was conducted in accordance with the agreed upon study methodology located in Appendix B. - IReport 030107.doc Page -1 March 2007 �� fGm[ey Hom ates;:Inc. Parking Demand Study STUDY METHODOLOGY ' In an effort to understand the parking demands for the prop osed shopping center redevelopment which consists of a ±40,000 square Wal *Mart Neighborhood Market and approximately ±9,500 square feet of additional specialty retail, existing parking demands were evaluated at a similar site. Based upon discussions with City of Clearwater planning and traffic staff, the existing Wal *Mart Neighborhood Market located in the northwest quadrant of Hillsborough Avenue & ' Elliot Drive, in Hillsborough County, Florida was used as the study site to determine the parking demands for the Wal *Mart Neighborhood Market. This site was chosen because there are no Wal *Mart Neighborhood Markets in the City of Clearwater or Pinellas County. In addition, site access and driveway locations of the chosen study site allow Wal *Mart Neighborhood Market traffic to be easily isolated. A field inventory of parking spaces at the study site was conducted and used as the basis for the parking demand data collection. Data was collected. for two weekdays (Tuesday and Thursday) ' and one Saturday, in 15- minute intervals for eight -hours (10:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m.) of a typical day, to determine the peak 15- minute parking demands for the study site. The data collection and analysis procedures used for the study were conducted in accordance with the agreed upon study methodology provided in Appendix B. Parking demands for the existing and future specialty retail on the site was determined based upon the Institute of Transportation Engineers' (ITE) Parking Generation, 3rd Edition (2004). Report 030107.doc Page - 2 March 2007 f 1 M EC[ttley-HOm m W tes, In.c. Parking Demand Study DATA COLLECTION Existing Study Site Inventory A site plan was reviewed, to determine if the existing site plan reflects field conditions, for the existing Wal *Mart Neighborhood Market located in the northwest quadrant of Hillsborough Avenue & Elliot Drive, in Hillsborough County, Florida. A field inventory of existing parking spaces (regular and handicap) was conducted prior to the first day of the parking demand study. This information was used as the basis for the parking demand data collection. It was noted during the inventory that the study site includes a bank outparcel located at the southeast corner of the site. Based upon discussions with City of Clearwater planning and traffic staff, this outparcel is isolated from the Wal*Mart Neighborhood Market and not consistent with the proposed site plan. Therefore parking demand data was not collected at the bank as part of this study. A site location map of the existing study site is provided in Appendix C. Reviewing the approved site plan to field conditions, the existing site plan was similar to actual field conditions, with some minor changes. The site plan specifies 200 parking spaces with three (3) spaces allocated for shopping cart corrals. However, actual site inventory shows six (6) spaces currently being utilized for shopping .cart corrals. The modified., existing site plan is provided in Appendix C. Table 1 summarizes the existing square footage of the Wal *Mart Neighborhood Market study site, and the number of available parking spaces. Shopping cart corrals are not included as available parking spaces. Table 1 Study Site Parking Inventory Wal *Mart Neighborhood Market - Hillsborough Avenue & Elliot Drive vailabe ak�ng�SPacesa IL g, ti 40,314 187 7 194 Report 030107.doc Page - 3 March 2007 � tGmley Hom and AssoaaleS, lne. Parking Demand :Study Parking Demand Data Collection The study was conducted for eight (8) hour periods, on each study day, from 10:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. This time period was chosen because it is consistent with typical time -of -day parking demand for supermarkets presented in Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Parking Generation 3rd Edition (2004). Based upon the City's request, the data was collected for two typical weekdays on Tuesday, February 13, 2007 and Thursday, February 15, 2007. In addition typical weekend conditions were collected on Saturday, February 17, 2007. Weather conditions during the days of data collection were clear and sunny, except for approximately 2 hours (11 a.m. to 1 p.m.) of rain on Tuesday, February 13, 2007. The rain did not noticeably affect parking demand of the Wal *Mart Neighborhood Market, as shown by the parking count data in Appendix D. During the three separate eight -hour periods, the parking lot was surveyed for ri parked vehicles in 15- minute intervals. Table 2 summarizes the peak demands for the eight -hour periods. Table 2 Parking Demand Data Summary Wal *Mart Neighborhood Market - Hillsborough Avenue & Elliot Drive ? � ,� ak15Mviute asking D, eman � �� yy 'AF �� r Regilar E�d�ea Ttal Tuesday 3:30 p.m. — 3:45 p.m. 65 4 69 Thursday 3:00 p.m. to 3:15 p.m. 53 3 56 Saturday 5:15 -p..m. to 5:30 p.m. 89 4 93 Report 030107.doc Page - 4 March 2007 lCmfey -Horn and Associates, Inc. Parking Demand Study PARKING DEMAND ' Parking demands were determined for both the proposed Wal *Mart Neighborhood Market and Ithe specialty retail center. ' Wal *Mart Neighborhood Market Parking Demands Reviewing the parking occupancy demand data at the existing facility, peak parking demand ratios (spaces per 1,000 square feet) for the existing Wal *Mart Neighborhood Market at Hillsborough Avenue & Elliot Drive in Hillsborough County, Florida was determined as the ratio of parking spaces used to the existing store size. Based upon the data collected on the three days studied, parking demands for the Wal *Mart Neighborhood Market range from 1.39 to 1.71 for ' typical weekdays, and was determined to be 2.31 for a typical Saturday. Table 3 summarizes these findings. Table 3 Existing Parking Demand Summary Wal *Mart Neighborhood Market - Hillsborough Avenue & Elliot Drive t t r _ �Peak315- kinute Parking=Demand 4 NAk 'P arkin« g F . 4 ?ilSrt.o r ( Size 'G ndd aY , , DA-If' my n r q . Tuesday 3:30 p.m. — 3:45 p.m. 69 40,314 1.71 Thursday 3:00 p.m. to 3:15 p.m. 56 40,314 1.39 Saturday 5:15 p.m. to 5:30 p.m. 93 40,314 2.31 I*Parking Demand Ratio defined based upon parking spaces used per 1,000 square feet. ' Because the proposed Wal *Mart Neighborhood Market is primarily a grocery store, yearly peak fluctuations are not expected to change the results. Therefore, no adjustments were made to the existing parking demand determined in the field. IReport 030107.doc Page - 5 March 2007 ❑�� 10mley-HOM . and AssoaatesVinc. Parking Demand Study • Specialty Retail Parking Demands Since the study site did not include specialty retail, data contained in ITE Parking Generation, 3rd Edition (2004) for Land Use Code 820: Shopping Center (Appendix E) was used to determine the peak period parking demand expected for the existing and proposed specialty retail center. Based upon this information, the average peak period parking demand for a typical weekday is 2.65 vehicles per 1,000 square feet. The average peak period parking demand for a typical Saturday is 2.97 vehicles per 1,000 square feet. These two rates will be used to estimate the parking demand of the specialty retail uses at the proposed shopping center. ' Report 030107.doc Page - 6 March 2007 IH W" lftley -Hom LA and Assflciates;1nc. Parking Demand Study PARKING SUPPLY Parking ratios were calculated based upon the number of proposed parking spaces and proposed floor area (as shown in the site plan in Appendix A) independently for both the Wal *Mart Neighborhood Market and the specialty retail uses as well as for the overall shopping center. Table 3 summarizes the proposed site plan parking supply. Since the parking will be used for all specialty retail (existing and proposed), the specialty retail square footage is based upon the sum . of the existing and proposed specialty retail. A r 1 Table 4 Proposed Parking Supply Summary Wal *Mart Neighborhood Market — North Highland Avenue & Greenlea Drive 4"d =Jse� � �P k><ngt � " Bu d><ng Sloe Parkilig pply escr>< tion Su lx s eft � Rat><o °* i a. a PP,Y . :,..(q _) . Proposed Wal *Mart 185 39,729 4.66 Neighborhood Market Proposed �4 132 28,072 4.70 Specialty Retail Proposed Total 317 67,801 4.68 Shopping Center *Parking Supply Ratio defined in available parking supply per 1,000 square leer. Report 030107.doc Page - 7 March 2007 C 1 10mley -Hom and Associates, Inc. Parking Demand Study PARKING ANALYSIS Parking supply provided on the proposed site was compared to the overall parking demand expected for the site. Parking ratios (available spaces /1,000 sq. ft.), were calculated to determine if the proposed parking supplied (as shown on the site plan in Appendix A) is expected to meet the site parking demands based upon the parking demand data collected at the existing Wal *Mart Neighborhood Market and the parking rates contained in ITE Parking Generation 3rd IEdition. r Since the proposed site includes a shared parking lot for the specialty retail and the Wal *Mart Neighborhood Market, the overall parking demand for the site was determined as the aggregate of the parking spaces needed for both land uses. Table 5 compares the expected peak weekday and weekend parking demand conditions to the proposed parking supply. Table 5 Parking Sup2ly and Demand Comparison Parking Peak Weekday Peak Weekend' Parking Demand Parking Demand Parking Parking. Parking. Parking Y Parking Parking Land Use Building Description Size Ratio Provided Ratio Needed Ratio Needed Wal *Mart 39,729 Neighborhood s ft 4.66 185 1.71* 68 2.31 92 Market Specialty 28,072 4.70 132 2.65 75 2.97 84 Retail sq. ft. Shopping 67,801 4.68 317 2.11 ** 143 2.60 ** 176' Center sq. ft. Parking ratio based upon highest peak i3-minute interval on a typical weekday. ** Calculated as the ratio of total needed parking to total shopping center square footage (in 1,000 sq. ft.) As shown in Table 5, adequate parking is expected to be provided for typical peak weekday and weekend conditions. IReport 030107.doc Page - 8 March 2007 .� z EGmn a2md l AS50tYC1CQS, Inc. Parking Demand Study CONCLUSION Based upon the analysis provided, the proposed shopping center in the northeast quadrant of the intersection of North Highland Avenue & Greenlea Drive in the City of Clearwater, Florida is expected to provide adequate parking to meet the shopping center's parking demands. This analysis was based upon parking demand data collected at a similar Wal*Mart Neighborhood Market located in the northwest quadrant of Hillsborough Avenue & Elliot Drive, in Hillsborough County, Florida and parking demand estimates provided in ITE's Parking Generation, 3rd Edition (2004). Overall, the shopping center with the Wal*Mart Neighborhood Market is currently designed with an overall parking ratio of 4.68 spaces per 1,000 - square feet, which is greater than the expected peak parking demand on Saturday of 2.60 spaces per 1,000 square feet. Report 030107.doc Page - 9 March 2007 APPENDIX A: Proposed Site Plan 1 1 1 1 1 6 F a z 6 751: 11 s: 2 E E a S °o yS N c g u F MI6 Y 7i ./ O ss i JOEL LANE 2 LANE, DIVIDED ASPHALT ROADWAY AADT VOLUMES - WA EIOS7INO FULL) ACCESS DRIVEWAY i I I i I I I, I I ! ! ! ! 1 i I I I I I 1 E1a5TIMc ACCESS DRIV I I 1 I I t � 1, ! I I {I !— '�_-- I - - - - -- ' — — — — — — — - - - - -- — — — — — — — -- — — — — — — — -- — — — — -- I I I i EXISTING SHOPPING D I I I � CENTER i II OVERALL PROJECT PROPERTY UNE 11 r nht- t��F�h' l F Ew5lmc 9gP5 io g j }� I �1 Ii '�"� +� , � EIS' -x• x'4 „ s'� y _ l z�"=�` EXISTING e ESTA :_/ Y o URANT I_ LANDSCAPE ss iz 77.sr 1 I ` <.•aT I OVERALL MACE q 'aRavERTr ME M 1 ll -` s 8gsrrB� � Lot 17 - dWS 3' N DOYrsr w ° nm- (F) e � OTTEN STREET¢ 2 LANE, DMDED- -- - I--I 4fl ASPHALT ROADWAY MDT VOLUMES e WA I I I r-�- i I I Iwo I i I �I --------------------- 1 7v Un110 cmnrxrur..n7rK+ I 1? yy1''Q_4�i %0 I THE PRESS ?'S ppt LAW IN FLORIDA 1 ON THIS I l` °o g a / E SITE LEGEND 0 E 0 ODIPS rAVOO1T AT TCIVt q E 1014 iM b 0 1m1IA Ar Lm MAYYK ROOT m Momm�wll 11N6 r s 6 Om 1aeL to AROrlexRwa Ewe � cAT B IT Tpl Iil r10.; rtA6 MOM Ya1i TMT MY E IrOMm L11' MYOaTE fOEI iM M 10 Ci tN., E O� R tlINO TNV•li. {It69' IIOIm ORQB Q EDL L L � OAT Yt1E 0107rM OOOI IaGIRi aZ ARCMRT111RL 8.116 0:1LT @ AW LLG101161 mlO1NTRM iM CK IRNS � 6 i� o m e i OLOR]C1[ 1M1@60Q rC OONrtIC161 q CODtYUR nl WK 100 OrMR.C111 ORMt 3 � n N ' a= / f O� ��iRR'K�R ETK !QT TER RatiuRr 4R s - . 8 I (D rio i7irlE r-c v1¢ a `a 0 Ai 1�6sO1c1PAN� •�iw6�n 1a Eris Mm. o� JOEL LANE 2 LANE, DIVIDED ASPHALT ROADWAY AADT VOLUMES - WA EIOS7INO FULL) ACCESS DRIVEWAY i I I i I I I, I I ! ! ! ! 1 i I I I I I 1 E1a5TIMc ACCESS DRIV I I 1 I I t � 1, ! I I {I !— '�_-- I - - - - -- ' — — — — — — — - - - - -- — — — — — — — -- — — — — — — — -- — — — — -- I I I i EXISTING SHOPPING D I I I � CENTER i II OVERALL PROJECT PROPERTY UNE 11 r nht- t��F�h' l F Ew5lmc 9gP5 io g j }� I �1 Ii '�"� +� , � EIS' -x• x'4 „ s'� y _ l z�"=�` EXISTING e ESTA :_/ Y o URANT I_ LANDSCAPE ss iz 77.sr 1 I ` <.•aT I OVERALL MACE q 'aRavERTr ME M 1 ll -` s 8gsrrB� � Lot 17 - dWS 3' N DOYrsr w ° nm- (F) e � OTTEN STREET¢ 2 LANE, DMDED- -- - I--I 4fl ASPHALT ROADWAY MDT VOLUMES e WA I I I r-�- i I I Iwo I i I �I --------------------- 1 7v Un110 cmnrxrur..n7rK+ I 1? yy1''Q_4�i %0 I THE PRESS ?'S ppt LAW IN FLORIDA 1 ON THIS I l` PROJECT N0. GROUNDWATER SHOULD BE ANTICIPATED oa7zssesL SHEET NUMBER ,T. CONTRACTOR'S BID SHALL INCLUDE I C -1 MON FOR ADDRESSING THIS ISSUE 8 of 12 m SITE LEGEND ODIPS rAVOO1T AT TCIVt q E 1014 iM b 0 1m1IA Ar Lm MAYYK ROOT m Momm�wll 11N6 Om 1aeL to AROrlexRwa Ewe � cAT B IT Tpl Iil r10.; rtA6 MOM Ya1i TMT MY E IrOMm L11' MYOaTE fOEI iM M 10 Ci tN., a o O� R tlINO TNV•li. {It69' IIOIm ORQB Q EDL OAT Yt1E 0107rM OOOI IaGIRi aZ ARCMRT111RL 8.116 0:1LT @ AW LLG101161 mlO1NTRM iM CK IRNS OLOR]C1[ 1M1@60Q rC OONrtIC161 q CODtYUR nl WK 100 OrMR.C111 ORMt O� ��iRR'K�R ETK !QT TER RatiuRr 4R N I (D rio i7irlE r-c v1¢ Ai 1�6sO1c1PAN� •�iw6�n 1a Eris Mm. � ® rr E616cR aR17 Mo EIR7l1 TM1E11. a ETn Mrxc Oz •IRU6I rAtTr Rol m nA7 m IaGTax PARIONG DATA WAL7IAR . Z DZTING RETIUL 9M 1777.77769 &FF. m PROPOSED FWrA& BI 7E llelm 6F. BTANDARD BPA C 176 sPACE ' AOCEIBBLE BPACm PAM) 10 BPACEE ti - CARIUM FOR O raPA= PARIVII' FOR OTRE77B III 6PACEE i EE N'ALMAIR RATIO an I I.M 6F. DEVIELOPEIM RATIO 4.7o /1.=&F. CRY OF CLEARWATER aA /1ANDF. a n TOTALBTERATIO /.71/1.000 ELF. m 1Ti L�GIa6A,OM7 YTm ER ,POI mITS GO d puE i rinaR (mRTr Euum M1®1t sAtO VSm R CArt E6IRRIA 0 d b 2 s v� -rwr ncor� rAmo sAm (u sham v.� L.A .nam 1r,7 ; �Ma :MEae'pa .A�� a ii loT b .1106a1�LIWT�1Ky1MTrtwir . 1R:ea s AEmsc sAao 1aT7 an s �n"� RmMO.rn ( AEa Ta tm iAE6 iYMa) a rARna !ON m'IVL6 Q rr16a sAa¢ 7 � °I°°ows Loin E..m 'r tr 'r Done oE-rY Mt1a On f � ❑ SITE DATA d WAL7IANT PARCEL LWAC DEMELOPETT77 RETAINIED ROWN 7.17AC TmAl- 7MAC � F Emaom�mm 3 � m�.s a.�inc'� c MOm SIC CIAtSICAl4t Nr R CuMw 6 O �iI i IIY 1UI 10 111TEmOM � < BUILDING DATA o � 3 i � wOR® rAAO ALFA iT� i oREtl na61 ARU x7M s t<tuO6 IiEE'D rx6re wnr ° r� Io6eowam 1.r w loaaawum wuErr ws ona Our.a RnAI am IM SITE PLAN NOTES L 110IIATJIOtl a 10Rt WU— A TiOIO @ E IRD E w1ml® w-t16 1 W MdMCM WTOWA E 1rSIR 0110➢10 O111A171RaL WL7Mf m E 16m a 1110011® EN-OR a ml rM'I'r'i A�Tm Imouwa aoanu � a on�a1 1WTIImI i M NR 11ROR1D 6F6R J L� l u- awalnr IIOY uRas Ar x nl0ar wlian uo a® rE- aruslort laraz L ��AL@R N1mIR1�RM0®tl E r!Q IO61141 J T��, L /ill rM.f AIO WIOYIi 1MML rNLY @ NL OlR1N R1L6ATg6 MO ®6IIO OLIA rtNLwOa W 7. NIRMA f WL IOO1 q M AMRT¢MAL 11N6 M OVL'T Id• lO6 NO OROfW6 A Y61rIRli a@f RNK AMR m rm1nR>< rRw1 Emq rims 1YA10 E1LJ6RwA No Doer 11AO0 lrarrt anRM1a 1autRln a Au aRrm aAlos anll E LAIOYJIm. ' vJ `^ L ALL t11lm 11Ii01 ARE m E w MO r. uMm o11D1MS Cram q 010066 /10100 ARE q M IRE[ O mR 1NlE mIU11i VTOL M f0S1110 rALT1d OMI C660L11O1 URIR Nr m E E MM M4 m IIOOVa tl MAOfIR. NL COR f WL ti 111C fn+OMIT, 101EVA111Y. WR. AO bb E6vA1W 60011 � ®IaRTEY �LNLiIC lM0 fIR1R NO OYEOM6 UL aL4a 11 IIMRdT 110 fWL E 006vICIS Rr000 M A6L GaE Ig1aPwOMtlErKi IOOI m M OIPRO 1111a N Q m Mat q AM7rILCMAt 1VI6 /EI1 t1R 11an110 OaR10l IfMI 0. Q' o u 11661 q 11MIILIL a IMCIN iRMI1E E619a Ens wnT mn6o m1 Eria 6 RM0.11m wMnE E6T710L .Pn Q � Q^ LL] LL LEGEND FOR PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS Z J 99 W f 1L6va .aalE ease .c 2 ^ w 111vos7 E1N AIO Euna (7 ED � 2 v `-� o j}mcz�: o Z : RTAI W 1110® .l -�UItT M0110 w Ill X < W >� > 0,0 3 nova raMwTRx w6trAA.M D' I- Z a Q Vi w of J ,1'® J = o T11R EgDElalma V ,V^ 1AO1mm Nun auR o6l6ctc o = 0 Z U PROJECT N0. GROUNDWATER SHOULD BE ANTICIPATED oa7zssesL SHEET NUMBER ,T. CONTRACTOR'S BID SHALL INCLUDE I C -1 MON FOR ADDRESSING THIS ISSUE 8 of 12 APPENDIX B: Methodology Statement i r . I PARKING OCCUPANCY METHODOLOGY STATEMENT Wal*Mart Neighborhood Market — City of Clearwater, Florida Store No. 4667 -00 North Highland Avenue & Greenlea Drive Pinellas County, Florida Introduction This parking occupancy study will evaluate parking demands for the proposed shopping center, which consists of a ±40,000 (approximately) square foot Wal *Mart Neighborhood Market store and ±10,000 (approximately) square feet of retail, to be located in the northeast quadrant of the intersection of North Highland Avenue & Greenlea Drive in the City of Clearwater, Florida. The Flexible Development Standards of the City of Clearwater allow for a parking demand study to support a parking ratio of less than 5.0 spaces, but greater than 4.0 spaces, per 1,000 square feet of commercial retail space. The parking occupancy study will evaluate parking demands at an existing Wal *Mart Neighborhood Market store, located in the northwest quadrant of Elliot Drive & Hillsborough Avenue, in Hillsborough County, Florida as the study site. Parking demands will be determined for full occupancy of the existing site with the proposed Wal *Mart Neighborhood Market store. Site Inventory Parking spaces will be determined for the proposed shopping center, based upon the proposed site plan, which includes a±40,000 (approximately) square foot Wal *Mart Neighborhood Market store and ±10,000 (approximately) square feet of retail, to be located in the northeast quadrant of the intersection of North Highland Avenue & Greenlea Drive in.the.City.of Clearwater, Florida. A field inventory of parking spaces will be conducted at an existing Wal *Mart Neighborhood Market store, located in the northwest quadrant of Elliot Drive & Hillsborough Avenue, in Hillsborough County, Florida. This information will be used as the basis for the parking occupancy data collection. Parking Occupancy Data Collection A parking occupancy study will be conducted for three eight -hour (8) periods from 10:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m., which is consistent with time -of -day parking demand for supermarkets presented in Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Parking Generation 3`d Edition. Data will be collected on two (2) typical weekdays (Tuesday and Thursday) and a Saturday. The parking lot will be surveyed for parked vehicles in 15- minute intervals throughout the eight -hour (8) periods for each day. Data will be analyzed and summarized to determine the peak parking occupancy for each of the three days of study. Parking Occupancy Adjustments Adjustments will be made through trip generation rates to account for existing store vacancies and peak season fluctuations based upon Land Use Code 820: Shopping Center, contained in ITE Parking Generation, 3rd Edition. Analysis Scenarios Parking occupancies will be collected for each of the days of study and a parking rate per 1,000 square feet will be determined based upon the square footage of the ±40,000 (approximately) square foot Wal *Mart Neighborhood Market store and ±10,000 (approximately) square feet of retail. Report Analysis findings will be summarized in a report provided to the City of Clearwater. APPENDIX C: Existing Study Site Plan LEGEND (D TREES 10 BE PRESERVED (SEE LANDSCAPE PLAIN FOR OETAIS) NOTES 1. SE SHEETS a FOR SIGNACE AM STRIPING LOCATi0N5 AND 2. SE SHEETS B FOR SITE LIGHTING LAYOUT AND INFO MAT1l1N. RESIDENTIAL OSLIN STREET S 5318'00' E 300.00' �.- .- .- ._._._. -. - _._.- . -. -. F1EV. 7.00 F CIAM'lNK / T.OB. 4:1 FENCE x( �. �ElEV. 11.00 X - W CHAN-4UNK FENCE K AC + / -) 1- 11.00 ROM EL - 0.00 YR EL (SYFWMD) �•. Eli PROPOSE i- SEOENTAL -� L -,1 PROPOSED SCOIEN C SIDEWALK WALL i1YP. FUTURE (ELSE tot AREA ro BE KEPT FREE OF MAKERS �L AND TERIALS BY WCONTRAC'TOR STORAGE N, FULL ACf�- V a. CONTRACTOR SHALL REEDIT 70 ARCH TIMMAL PLANS FOR PRECISE BULD.m DI ENSION5, MALMO U1U7Y ENTIRNmE LOCATIONS, AND EXACT LOCATIONS AND DIMENSIONS OF VESOMULE, EDr PORCHES, RAMPS. TRUCK DOCKS. DOWNSPOUTS AND BOLLARDS N MAI DMC SIDEWALKS NO AT 1RUCK WELL RETAONC TUNIS ALSO RUM TO ARCHTECNRAL PLAITS FOR LOCATIONS AND MOUNTING NSRIMIIONS FOR WALL MOUNTED SIGNS 4. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL APPLY FOR AND OBTAIN NECESSARY PERMITS FROM HILLSOOROUGH COUNTY 4 ON -S11E DIMENSIONS AND RAOI ARE 70 FACE OF CUM OR EDGE OF LANE UNLESS OT ERWISE NOTED 0. OUANTITY OF CART CORRALS (3) PER WAL -KART RF.OUBE]EtOS IT ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES WILL BE PROPERLY SOLD AND STRIPED N ACCORDANCE WTI FLORIDA STATUTE 316. THE MANUAL ON INFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICESS, OR OTHER APPUCA13LE STANDARDS 6 THE ENGINEER CERTIFIES THAT THE SITE HAS BEEN DESIGNED N GENERAL. ACCORDANCE WTH THE AMERICANS WTH DSAMUTES ACT. G. ALL ON-SRE PARKING SPACES WILL BE STRIPED AND SIGNED N ACDOROANCE WITH THE MANUAL ON UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL CEO= LATEST EDITION WNLESS OTQRWSE NOTED HEREIN). DEIEMMKAL ARROWS AND STOP BARS STALL BE STRIPED N WRITE UNLESS 01ERW6E NOTED ON SHEETS 9 t 10. ASSOCIATE PAMNMG SPACES TO BE SWIPED YELLOW AND CUSTOMER PARING SHALL BE STRIPED N WHITE. ACCEWBIE STRIPING SHALL BE PER CODE R SHALL BE THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO PRO4T3Y SIC/ AND STRIPE THE SITE N ACCORDANCE WITI APPLICABLE STANDARDS. 10, NO IMCA71ON SYSTEM OR LANDSCAPING SHALL BE 06TALL D N ANY COUNTY OR STATE RIGHT-OF-WAY WTIOUT ISSUANCE OF APPROPRIATE RIGHT -OF -WAY USE POUT. 11. THE oWER/DEN:LOPER AOMOMIFDCES THAT THE SITE AND ITS SIFREOlEF1T BUILDING PEDYRS SHALL COMPLY LY IM ALL StiE PLAN APPROVAL CONDITIONS. 12 ALL STRUCTURES, NCAmNG BUFFER WALLS. RETANNG WALL; SWAGE. EIF REOIIE SEPARATE BUILDING PERMITSS, 13. SEE SKEET 2 FOR THE FOUNDATION SUB - SURFACE PREPARATION NOTE- 4. THE EXTEMOIR PANT FINISH WILL BE OF A NATIRA. TOE OR FARM TONE 15. RE TRASH COMPACTOR RILL BE SCREENED WIN AN ARCHITECTURALLY FINISHED MASONRY WALL. 10. FIOOOPIAN COMPENSATION NOT ROQUIRED DUE 70 UNLIMITED BASIN (RIO TAMPA 8A)). WRAAL 1 T NDIX AM HITS OF LEASE LOT / ONSTRI/CIIOI AREA Nor INC7IDED) � C 1 PROPOSED 0DEW 4• 5 S/tor�tay � C4AT CORRALS PAO f'OR Al1E 1.{' FLCII PANEL pROIECT)E I E S am OR EACH IDEWN CONCRETE W E SIDEWALK WAL * MA" 2 ASSOCIATE IIBONIVA R7RDAp/1�T 'ARKNG SPACES 6FQE0.aFaa•a6 Dean 40,314 S.F. F.F. - 1240 4 I- SCREEN WALL LEGATION -COMPAL D F COSINE (Iva) n ATRNG (TV.) (TIP.) SEE I e l s e rRl I• /I tt AssoaATE /'t / / /Ai C OF-Vi {lm S 5316.00 E 12D.00' (M)-1 I EnwavTTwId consultants E.& No. 696 1220 Tech Boulevard Tampa, Florida 33619 Phone: (813) 620 -1460 ,11 WWW.kimley- hom.can AlO pals ' 1t1�W1 � X O)m,f Ilmllm IOOp N N IiAAFNf 6 0WS 6 MDfm OlY fv T,e steam Np•eii Ai aDlf ra W4a R W IIBFIEII RISE 6Y0IFIATIII 1WIprMla a w npnnm Wppur FIRW raaWWAeW RW I6VTAWW nrcr- '1mN �a- M IIpWnT A IWILY�D1Wl Ai AtimAlg K W a Go a. O = Q U 1, W C) � o� 8 I 8.Y i+ LEGEND (D TREES 10 BE PRESERVED (SEE LANDSCAPE PLAIN FOR OETAIS) NOTES 1. SE SHEETS a FOR SIGNACE AM STRIPING LOCATi0N5 AND 2. SE SHEETS B FOR SITE LIGHTING LAYOUT AND INFO MAT1l1N. RESIDENTIAL OSLIN STREET S 5318'00' E 300.00' �.- .- .- ._._._. -. - _._.- . -. -. F1EV. 7.00 F CIAM'lNK / T.OB. 4:1 FENCE x( �. �ElEV. 11.00 X - W CHAN-4UNK FENCE K AC + / -) 1- 11.00 ROM EL - 0.00 YR EL (SYFWMD) �•. Eli PROPOSE i- SEOENTAL -� L -,1 PROPOSED SCOIEN C SIDEWALK WALL i1YP. FUTURE (ELSE tot AREA ro BE KEPT FREE OF MAKERS �L AND TERIALS BY WCONTRAC'TOR STORAGE N, FULL ACf�- V a. CONTRACTOR SHALL REEDIT 70 ARCH TIMMAL PLANS FOR PRECISE BULD.m DI ENSION5, MALMO U1U7Y ENTIRNmE LOCATIONS, AND EXACT LOCATIONS AND DIMENSIONS OF VESOMULE, EDr PORCHES, RAMPS. TRUCK DOCKS. DOWNSPOUTS AND BOLLARDS N MAI DMC SIDEWALKS NO AT 1RUCK WELL RETAONC TUNIS ALSO RUM TO ARCHTECNRAL PLAITS FOR LOCATIONS AND MOUNTING NSRIMIIONS FOR WALL MOUNTED SIGNS 4. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL APPLY FOR AND OBTAIN NECESSARY PERMITS FROM HILLSOOROUGH COUNTY 4 ON -S11E DIMENSIONS AND RAOI ARE 70 FACE OF CUM OR EDGE OF LANE UNLESS OT ERWISE NOTED 0. OUANTITY OF CART CORRALS (3) PER WAL -KART RF.OUBE]EtOS IT ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES WILL BE PROPERLY SOLD AND STRIPED N ACCORDANCE WTI FLORIDA STATUTE 316. THE MANUAL ON INFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICESS, OR OTHER APPUCA13LE STANDARDS 6 THE ENGINEER CERTIFIES THAT THE SITE HAS BEEN DESIGNED N GENERAL. ACCORDANCE WTH THE AMERICANS WTH DSAMUTES ACT. G. ALL ON-SRE PARKING SPACES WILL BE STRIPED AND SIGNED N ACDOROANCE WITH THE MANUAL ON UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL CEO= LATEST EDITION WNLESS OTQRWSE NOTED HEREIN). DEIEMMKAL ARROWS AND STOP BARS STALL BE STRIPED N WRITE UNLESS 01ERW6E NOTED ON SHEETS 9 t 10. ASSOCIATE PAMNMG SPACES TO BE SWIPED YELLOW AND CUSTOMER PARING SHALL BE STRIPED N WHITE. ACCEWBIE STRIPING SHALL BE PER CODE R SHALL BE THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO PRO4T3Y SIC/ AND STRIPE THE SITE N ACCORDANCE WITI APPLICABLE STANDARDS. 10, NO IMCA71ON SYSTEM OR LANDSCAPING SHALL BE 06TALL D N ANY COUNTY OR STATE RIGHT-OF-WAY WTIOUT ISSUANCE OF APPROPRIATE RIGHT -OF -WAY USE POUT. 11. THE oWER/DEN:LOPER AOMOMIFDCES THAT THE SITE AND ITS SIFREOlEF1T BUILDING PEDYRS SHALL COMPLY LY IM ALL StiE PLAN APPROVAL CONDITIONS. 12 ALL STRUCTURES, NCAmNG BUFFER WALLS. RETANNG WALL; SWAGE. EIF REOIIE SEPARATE BUILDING PERMITSS, 13. SEE SKEET 2 FOR THE FOUNDATION SUB - SURFACE PREPARATION NOTE- 4. THE EXTEMOIR PANT FINISH WILL BE OF A NATIRA. TOE OR FARM TONE 15. RE TRASH COMPACTOR RILL BE SCREENED WIN AN ARCHITECTURALLY FINISHED MASONRY WALL. 10. FIOOOPIAN COMPENSATION NOT ROQUIRED DUE 70 UNLIMITED BASIN (RIO TAMPA 8A)). WRAAL 1 T NDIX AM HITS OF LEASE LOT / ONSTRI/CIIOI AREA Nor INC7IDED) � C 1 PROPOSED 0DEW 4• 5 S/tor�tay � C4AT CORRALS PAO f'OR Al1E 1.{' FLCII PANEL pROIECT)E I E S am OR EACH IDEWN CONCRETE W E SIDEWALK WAL * MA" 2 ASSOCIATE IIBONIVA R7RDAp/1�T 'ARKNG SPACES 6FQE0.aFaa•a6 Dean 40,314 S.F. F.F. - 1240 4 I- SCREEN WALL LEGATION -COMPAL D F COSINE (Iva) n ATRNG (TV.) (TIP.) SEE I e l s e rRl I• /I tt AssoaATE /'t / / /Ai C OF-Vi {lm s ar SWING "h ELEV. 640 STDRMWATER POND N0. 2 (0.16 AC TOO -9.5 BOTTOM EL 140 a 25 NR EL (SNFYMD) 0.53 25 Yw EL ODOT) LZ5 100 YR EL (FOOT) L37 25 ' FUOT GRAVITY , yy i . i { RETANNC WAIL (Poe !it '� FDOT INDEX s12I �}� ONE (' 4 �i UNITS OF * ` a � i i ph.Mrr RELOCATED 6' AUAIIFAN FENCIIO AROUND SOUIKMST POND TO STORMWATER POND N0. 2 ♦ �' 'r -FI tt-t S��D Rau AVENUE s a a I r ( I A PART OF SECTION134, TOWNSHIP 28 SOUTH, RANGE 17 EAST. BONG A PART OF LOT 'A' OF EL IOT AND HARRISON SUBDIVISION AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 32, PA r17� THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF HILLS BOROUGH COUNTY, FLORIDA, METH LOTS 1 THROUGH 7, AND LOT 14 OF JANE TERRACE, AS D IN PUT BOOK 35, PACE 99 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF HIU.SCOUNTY, FLORIDA, ALL BEING MORE PARTICULARLY S FOLLOWS: COMMENCE AT THE ORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT 'A' OF ELUOT AND HARRISON SUBDIVISI AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 32, PACE 17 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF HIUSBOROUGH COUNTY, FLORIDA; THENCE ALONG THE NORTHWESTERLY RI T -OF -WAY LINE OF ELUOT DRIVE, S.3556'46'W., 200.00 FEET TO TH ;POINT OF BEGINNING, THENCE CONTINUE ALONG SAID NORTHWESTERLY fUgG�iT -OF -WAY LANE, S35'56'46'W, 395.82 FEET; THENCE DEPARTING SAID NO�IHWESIERLY RIGHT -OF -WAY LANE ALONG THE NORTHEASTERLY BOUNDARY OF THOSE LANDS DESCRIBED IN O.R. BOOK 11512, PAGE 41 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY, FLORIDA. N.54- 03.14 -�W"�."��150.00 FEET, THENCE ALONG THE NORTHWESTERLY BOUNDARY OF SAID IUNOS. 53556'46'W., 330.01 FEET TO THE NORTHEASTERLY PoG T -OF -WAY LANE OF HILLS80RWd1 AVENUE (STATE ROAD SBO }, THENCE 'ALONG SAID NORTHEASTERLY RIGHT -OF -WAY UNE N.5358'18'W, 87.24 FEET TO THE EASTERLY RIGHT -OF -WAY UNE OF IM RTENS STREET; ENCE ALONG SAID EASTERLY RIGHT -OF -WAY UNE, 14.00IM'SSE. 902-6j FEET TO THE SOUTHWESTERLY UNE OF LOTS 8 THROUGH 13 OF SAID JANE TERRACE; THENCE ALONG SAID SOUTHWESTERLY UNE'AND THE NORTHEASTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 14, S53'I6'00'E., 759.44 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. CONTAINING 7.1943 �CRES MORE OR LESS. Em motes, t(1c. I EnwavTTwId consultants E.& No. 696 1220 Tech Boulevard Tampa, Florida 33619 Phone: (813) 620 -1460 ,11 WWW.kimley- hom.can AlO pals ' 1t1�W1 � X O)m,f Ilmllm IOOp N N IiAAFNf 6 0WS 6 MDfm OlY fv T,e steam Np•eii Ai aDlf ra W4a R W IIBFIEII RISE 6Y0IFIATIII 1WIprMla a w npnnm Wppur FIRW raaWWAeW RW I6VTAWW nrcr- '1mN �a- M IIpWnT A IWILY�D1Wl Ai AtimAlg K W a Go a. O = Q U 1, W C) � o� 8 GRAPHIC SCALE 8.Y i+ � s t i ( w eacr) .1 ! I ' 1 Inch = 50 M BUILDING DATA • t L4.� MR ONIC AREA, O1 NEIQHBORFIOOD MARKET.) 40.314 S (*) NEIGHBORHOOD m ppq� MAXIMUM BY CODE ! 50' FLOOR ARAM SINE TOTAL 0.1] iYAXLON BY CODE . 025 SITE TOTAL 1292 V d NUMBER F CODE NUMBER CE FlA0R5 _ 2101[ 1 1 an Mc sETILAIXC FRONT (3O RED.) PROVIDED 1((S)S ��LLII C 1a a WW ((32 SCAIE: PROPOSED 5' CONCRETE SIDE (20 REC))- SOUTHEAST SIDE (20 It%) - SOUTHVtST ti< l*/ 164' (! 1 - SIDEWALK EVIL ACCESS LLA 1 t NUE PARKING DATA. 1 i PARKING CRITERLA RETAIL CODE REQUIRED PANIONG SPACES (t SP/20D TOTAL GFA) 202 SPACES t CAR CORRALS - STANDARD SPACES a.6'AI 3 190 SPACES ! 7_P�NCSPAftsyyR61NE0 ' rAW� roA PARKING RATIO COUNry 445 SP /Kam S P4 CA " • C W jBASED ON 40 SF)ILWOROIW RER wAL�IARf CPoIEIIAf VIED AN ACE K UNDER 44 THEREFORE A MNMW OF 21f ASE PARKING HAS BEEN PROVIDED. 1 1 ( SITE DATA ' PROPOSED 5. CONCRETE SDEWALK SITE LOCATION: NORTIR EST GORIER OF HILLSBOROUGH AWNS NO 1 FULL AOO5S ZOW40 CIASSHCATIO: ColsRRCIAL (U;=), - C-0 _ �y LAND USE CNA)FICAT l TAX FOLK) OM- La'AL ,IIIRISDICIIDM: �,, RESIDENTIAL - RES-B 008249,0000 MLLSHOROU H COUNTY. FLORIDA .it :�yc^�O C�pt�R ale AREA. NOOVIB0181000 MARKET 7.19 AD (t) st1 (M"I"NC 1E15E IOTnj , VITAL MPETMOU I AAFA _ ��T AREA GROSS 215,982 S St33 ( *IIAIIAIM PFRCQITS�MPERVIOUS � 69fI TORS PEIMITIED BY CODE) /Ca� PERCENT PERVIOUS 97.702 S (A) t 31Z (3OX MINIMUM PERMRiED BY OODE) (b AS REQUIRED BY CORE AID - EL 10.0 (INDICATES AREAS OF 10D -YEAR FLOOD; BASE FLOOD ELEVATIONS NO FLOOD HAZARD FACTORS ARE DEIEAMIED) FEMA FIRM PANEL N0. 1ZO1Z OK90C DATED APRIL 17. 1901, PROPOSE OF BANK PARKING LOT01NATI011 PARKING LOT Am I STOR S101MWA1ER AREA SHALL CE COORONATFD WM THE BAtIX TO , s ar SWING "h ELEV. 640 STDRMWATER POND N0. 2 (0.16 AC TOO -9.5 BOTTOM EL 140 a 25 NR EL (SNFYMD) 0.53 25 Yw EL ODOT) LZ5 100 YR EL (FOOT) L37 25 ' FUOT GRAVITY , yy i . i { RETANNC WAIL (Poe !it '� FDOT INDEX s12I �}� ONE (' 4 �i UNITS OF * ` a � i i ph.Mrr RELOCATED 6' AUAIIFAN FENCIIO AROUND SOUIKMST POND TO STORMWATER POND N0. 2 ♦ �' 'r -FI tt-t S��D Rau AVENUE s a a I r ( I A PART OF SECTION134, TOWNSHIP 28 SOUTH, RANGE 17 EAST. BONG A PART OF LOT 'A' OF EL IOT AND HARRISON SUBDIVISION AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 32, PA r17� THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF HILLS BOROUGH COUNTY, FLORIDA, METH LOTS 1 THROUGH 7, AND LOT 14 OF JANE TERRACE, AS D IN PUT BOOK 35, PACE 99 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF HIU.SCOUNTY, FLORIDA, ALL BEING MORE PARTICULARLY S FOLLOWS: COMMENCE AT THE ORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT 'A' OF ELUOT AND HARRISON SUBDIVISI AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 32, PACE 17 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF HIUSBOROUGH COUNTY, FLORIDA; THENCE ALONG THE NORTHWESTERLY RI T -OF -WAY LINE OF ELUOT DRIVE, S.3556'46'W., 200.00 FEET TO TH ;POINT OF BEGINNING, THENCE CONTINUE ALONG SAID NORTHWESTERLY fUgG�iT -OF -WAY LANE, S35'56'46'W, 395.82 FEET; THENCE DEPARTING SAID NO�IHWESIERLY RIGHT -OF -WAY LANE ALONG THE NORTHEASTERLY BOUNDARY OF THOSE LANDS DESCRIBED IN O.R. BOOK 11512, PAGE 41 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY, FLORIDA. N.54- 03.14 -�W"�."��150.00 FEET, THENCE ALONG THE NORTHWESTERLY BOUNDARY OF SAID IUNOS. 53556'46'W., 330.01 FEET TO THE NORTHEASTERLY PoG T -OF -WAY LANE OF HILLS80RWd1 AVENUE (STATE ROAD SBO }, THENCE 'ALONG SAID NORTHEASTERLY RIGHT -OF -WAY UNE N.5358'18'W, 87.24 FEET TO THE EASTERLY RIGHT -OF -WAY UNE OF IM RTENS STREET; ENCE ALONG SAID EASTERLY RIGHT -OF -WAY UNE, 14.00IM'SSE. 902-6j FEET TO THE SOUTHWESTERLY UNE OF LOTS 8 THROUGH 13 OF SAID JANE TERRACE; THENCE ALONG SAID SOUTHWESTERLY UNE'AND THE NORTHEASTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 14, S53'I6'00'E., 759.44 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. CONTAINING 7.1943 �CRES MORE OR LESS. Em motes, t(1c. £ngbnring, PlannkV and EnwavTTwId consultants E.& No. 696 1220 Tech Boulevard Tampa, Florida 33619 Phone: (813) 620 -1460 Fa1c (813) 620 -1542 WWW.kimley- hom.can AlO pals ' 1t1�W1 � X O)m,f Ilmllm IOOp N N IiAAFNf 6 0WS 6 MDfm OlY fv T,e steam Np•eii Ai aDlf ra W4a R W IIBFIEII RISE 6Y0IFIATIII 1WIprMla a w npnnm Wppur FIRW raaWWAeW RW I6VTAWW nrcr- '1mN �a- M IIpWnT A IWILY�D1Wl Ai AtimAlg K W a Go a. O = Q U W C) � o� 8 S 8.Y t O1 m ppq� m m V d a� 1 QQF OV ��LLII C 1a a WW SCAIE: 1. 50 DRAIIIDG NAME: 62663-01 SHWT If- 3 APPENDIX D: Count Data and Parking Demands t u 17 7 L CI' 7 �I Wal *Mart Parking Occupancy Study Wal *Mart Only Parking. Counts (Existing Conditions) Hillsborough County, Florida Store No. 5255 Date: Tuesday. February 13. 2007 Start Time Wal*Mart Parking Occupancy Counts Total Parking Counts Existing Parking Ratio (veh /S.F.) Regular Handicap 10:00 50 3 53 1.31 10:15 47 3 50 1.24 10:30 54 1 55 1.36 10:45 58 2 60 1.49 11:00 57 3 60 1.49 11:15 60 2 62 1.54 11:30 60 3 63 1.56 11:45 50 4 54 1.34 12:00 54 4 58 1.44 12:15 54 2 56 1.39 12:30 59 4 63 1.56 12:45 54 1 55 1.36 1:00 49 2 51 1.27 1:15 41 4 45 1.12 1:30 47 3 50 1.24 1:45 48 4 52 1.29 2:00 48 4 52 1.29 2:15 40 1 41 1.02 2:30 48 3 51 1.27 2:45 64 3 67 1.66 3:00 52 4 56 1.39 3:15 59 4 63 -1.56 . ., 3:45 58 3n fit 1.51 4:00 62 2 64 1.59 4:15 56 1 57 1.41 4:30 54 3 57 1.41 .4:45 48 2 50 1.24 5:00 52 2 54 1.34 5:15 55 2 57 1.41 5:30 54 2 56 1.39 5:45 56 1 57 1.41 8 -Hour Count Totals 1,713 86 1,799 Total Number of Spaces 194 Existing Wal *Mart S.F. (KSF) 40.314 Spaces /KSF 4.81 Wal*Mart Parking Occupancy Study Wal*Mart Only Parking Counts (Existing Conditions) Hillsborough County, Florida Store No. 5255 Date_ Thursday. February 15. 2007 Start Time Wal*Mart Parking Occupancy Counts Total Parking Counts Existing Parking Ratio (veh /S.F.) Regular Handicap 10:00 33 2 35 0.87 10:15 41 5 46 1.14 10:30 49 6 55 1.36 10:45 41 4 45 1.12 11:00 45 5 50 1.24 11:15 51 4 55 1.36 11:30 45 4 49 1.22 11:45 48 3 51 1.27 12:00 49 2 51 1.27 12:15 49 3 52 1.29 12:30 49 3 52 1.29 12:45 50 3 53 1.31 1:00 52 2 54 1.34 1:15 42 3 45 1.12 1:30 42 3 45 1.12 1:45 46 2 48 1.19 2:00 47 3 50 1.24 2:15 47 3 50 1.24 2:30 53 2 55 1.36 2:45 51 2 53 1.31 3:15 52 2 54 1.34 3:30 52 2 54 1.34 3:45 50 2 52 1.29 4:00 47 4 51 1.27 4:15 48 3 51 1.27 4:30 50 2 52 1.29 4:45 51 2 53 1.31 5:00 52 2 54 1.34 5:15 46 1 47 1.17 5:30 42 2 44 1.09 5:45 41 2 43 1.07 8 -Hour Count Totals 1,514 91 1,605 Total Number of Spaces 194 Existing Wal*Mart S.F. (KSF) 40.314 Spaces /KSF 4.81 ' Wal *Mart Parking Occupancy Study Wal *Mart Only Parking Counts (Existing Conditions) Hillsborough County, Florida ' Store No. 5255 Date: Saturdav, February 17, 2007 j� 7" L L L r-- I1 L_ � Start Time Wal *Mart Parking Occupancy Counts Total Parking Counts Existing Parking Ratio (veh /S.F.) Regular Handicap 10:00 46 2 48 1.19 10:15 52 3 55 1.36 10:30 62 4 66 1.64 10:45 62 3 .65 1.61 11:00 59 2 61 1.51 11:15 66 3 69 1.71 11:30 71 3 74 1.84 11:45 67 5 72 1.79 12:00 69 3 72 1.79 12:15 65 3 68 1.69 12:30 61 3 64 1.59 12:45 64 4 68 1.69 1:00 71 4 75 1.86 1:15 58 2 60 1.49 1:30 72 6 78 1.93 1:45 70 4 74 1.84 2:00 66 3 69 1.71 2:15 64 4 68 1.69 2:30 69 5 74 1.84 2:45 67 5 72 1.79 3:00 71 5 76 1.89 3:15 69 5 74 1.84 3:30 75 5 80 1.98 3:45 55 6 61 1.51 4:00 72 6 78 1.93 4:15 70 4 74 1.84 4:30 81 4 85 2.11 4:45 83 4 87 2.16 5:00 81 5 86 2.13 75 3 ti 78 1.93 5:30 5:45 72 6 78- 1.93 8 -Hour Count Totals 2,174 128 2,302 Total Number of Spaces 194 Existing Wal *Mart S.F. (KSF) 40.314 Spaces /KSF 4.81 APPENDIX E: ITE Parking Generation 3rd Edition Parking Rates Land Use: 820 Shopping Center Average Peak-Period Parking Demand vs: 1,000 sq. ft. GLA On a: Monday through Thursday (Non- December) Isis Peak Period Number of Study Sites Average Size of Study Sites Average Peak Period Parking Demand Standard Deviation Coefficient of Variation Range 85th Percentile 33rd Percentile 11:00 -3:00 n= .m.; 6:00 -7:00 p.m. as 19 331,000 sq. ft. GLA 2.65 vehicles per 1,000 sq. ft. GLA 0.98 6000 37% 1.33 -5.58 vehicles per 1,000 sq. ft. GLA 3.35 vehicles per 1,000 sq. ft. GLA 2.26 vehicles per 1,000 sq. ft. GLA Monday- Thursday Non - December Peak Period Parking Demand N 10000 as 8000 a� > 6000 M L 4000 ca a u 2000 IL 0 P = 1 _. x + 140 -- .� R 2 = 0.98 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 x = 1,000 sq. ft. GLA • Actual Data Points Institute of Transportation Engineers Fitted Curve - - - - Average Rate 199 Parking Generation, 3rd Edition Land Use: 820 Shopping Center Average Peak Period Parking Demand vs: 1,000 sq. ft. GLA On a: Saturday (Non- December) Saturday Non- December Peak Period Parking Demand N 12000 Peak Period 1:00 -2:00 p.m. Number of Study Sites 20 ,Average Size of Study Sites 549,000 sq. ft. GLA Average Peak Period Parking Demand 2.97 vehicles per 1,000 sq. ft. GLA Standard Deviation 0.71 Coefficient of Variation 24% 95% Confidence Interval 2.66 -3.28 vehicles er 1,000 sq. ft. GLA Range 1.85 -4.82 vehicles per 1,000 sq. ft. GLA 85th Percentile 3.56 vehicles per 1,000 sq. ft. GLA 33rd Percentile 2.65 vehicles per 1,000 sq. ft. GLA Saturday Non- December Peak Period Parking Demand N 12000 z 10000 8000 6000 m L c� 4000 a 11 2000 °' 0 P= 3.37x -94 R2 = 0.98 0 • Actual Data Points Institute of Transportation Engineers 1000 2000 3000 x = 1,000 sq. ft. GLA - - - - Average Rate Parking Generation, 3rd Edition 0 Parking Demand Study For Submittal to the City of Clearwater J Parking Demand Study Wal * Mart Neighborhood Market City of Clearwater, Florida Prepared for Wal*Mart Stores, Inc. Bentonville, Arkansas Prepared by: Kimley -Horn and Associates, Inc. Tampa, Florida ©Kimley -Hom and Associates, Inc. March 2007 047253651 ®� ® Kimley -Horn D and Associates, Inc. ORIGINAL RFD APR o 2 2007 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER Parking Demand Study For Submittal to the City of Clearwater Parking Demand Study Wal * Mart Neighborhood Market City of Clearwater, Florida Prepared for: Wal * Mart Stores, Inc. Bentonville, Arkansas Prepared by: Kimley -Horn and Associates, Inc. Tampa, Florida ©Kimley -Horn and Associates, Inc. David EiTlroemel T.E. -Date'` March 2007 10117 P.r', cess Palm Avenue '_, ° 047253651 Tampa, Florida 33610-8300'' ' PE Number: 57614 CA 00000696 The entirety of this report, including text and images, is property of Kimley -Horn and Associates, protected under U.S. copyright law. Copy'right ©2007 Kimley -Korn and Associates, Inc. ORIGINAL, tRELIED APR 0 2 2007 'C]Mrl. Iftley -Horn PLANNING DEPARTMENT W and AssWaW. Inc. CIPY OF CLEARwATER Parking Demand Study EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ' A parking demand study was performed for a proposed shopping center redevelopment, which ' consists of a ±40,000 square foot Wal *Mart Neighborhood Market and approximately ±9,500 square feet of additional specialty retail, to be located in the northeast quadrant of the ' intersection of North Highland Avenue & Greenlea Drive in the City of Clearwater, Florida. The existing Wal *Mart Neighborhood Market located in the northwest quadrant of Hillsborough ' Avenue & Elliot Drive, in Hillsborough County, Florida was used as the study site to determine the parking demands for the Wal *Mart Neighborhood Market located in the proposed shopping ' center redevelopment. ' Data was collected at the Wal *Mart Neighborhood Market study site for two weekdays (Tuesday and Thursday) and one Saturday, in 15- minute intervals for eight -hours (10:00 a.m. to ' 6:00 p.m.) of a typical day, to determine the peak 15- minute parking demands for the study site. The data collection and analysis procedures used for the study were conducted in accordance ' with the agreed upon study methodology, and parking demands for the existing and future specialty retail on the site was determined based upon the Institute of Transportation Engineers' ' (ITE) Parking Generation, 3rd Edition (2004). Based upon the data collected on the three -days - studied, parking demands for the Wal *Mart Neighborhood Market range from 1.39 to 1.71 for 1 typical weekdays, and was determined to be 2.31 for a typical Saturday. IFor the specialty retail uses at the proposed shopping center, data contained in ITE Parking Generation, 3rd Edition (2004) for Land Use Code 820: Shopping Center was used to determine an average peak period parking demand for a typical weekday of 2.65 vehicles per 1,000 square feet, and an average peak period parking demand for a typical Saturday of 2.97 vehicles per 1,000 square feet. ' Parking demand for the proposed shopping center redevelopment was calculated based upon the number of proposed parking spaces and proposed floor area independently for both the ' Wal *Mart Neighborhood Market and the specialty retail uses as well as for the overall shopping ' March 2007 Report 030107.doc 1 �—� iGmley -Hom 8M Associates, Inc. Parking Demand Study ' r e center. A peak weekday parking demand of 2.11 vehicles per 1,000 square feet, a eak peak ' weekend parking demand of 2.60 vehicles per 1,000 square feet were calculated for the total shopping center redevelopment. The site plan for the shopping center shows a maximum parking ' ratio of 4.68 available parking spaces per 1,000 square feet. ' Based upon the analysis provided, the proposed shopping center in the northeast quadrant of the intersection of North Highland Avenue & Greenlea Drive in the City of Clearwater, Florida is ' expected to provide adequate parking to meet the shopping center's parking demands. 11 Report 030107.doc 11 March 2007 ORIGINAL RECEIVED APR 0 2 2007 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER Report 030107.doc 11 March 2007 t ClEffIGmlq Horn ,�and.ksociatesi Inc. Parking Demand Study TABLE OF CONTENTS Page EXECUTIVESUMMARY ........................................................................ ............................... i INTRODUCTION....................................................................................... ..............................1 STUDYMETHODOLOGY ........................................................................ ..............................2 DATACOLLECTION ................................................................................ ..............................3 Existing Study Site Inventory ........................................................... .............................3. Parking Demand Data Collection .................................................... ..............................4 PARKINGDEMAND ..............................................................:.................. ..............................5 Wal *Mart Neighborhood Market Parking Demands ..................... ..............................5 Specialty Retail Parking Demands ................................................... ..............................6 PARKINGSUPPLY .................................................................................... ..............................7 PARKINGANALYSIS ............................................................................... ..............................8 CONCLUSION............................................................................................ ..............................9 LIST OF TABLES Page TABLE 1: Study Site Parking Inventory ................................................ ..............................3 TABLE 2: Parking Demand Data Summary ......................................... ..............................4 TABLE 3: Existing Parking Demand Summary .................................... ..............................5 TABLE 4: Proposed Parking Supply Summary .................................... ..............................7 TABLE 5: Parking Supply and Demand Comparison ........................... ..............................8 ORIGINAL RECEIVED APR 02 2007 PLANNING DEPARliviEw CITY OF CLFA PWAT P= Report 030107.doc iii March 2007 ,C]Mn 10mley -H ©m W .. ! and Associates, Inc. Parking Demand Study LIST OF APPENDICES APPENDIX A: Proposed Site Plan APPENDIX B: Methodology Statement APPENDIX C: Existing Study Site Plan APPENDIX D: Count Data and Parking Demands APPENDIX E: ITE Parking Generation 3rd Edition Parking Rates E 0MINAL RECEIVED APR 0 2 2007 PLANNING DEPARYIAENI CITY OF CLEARWATEP Report 030107:doc iv March 2007 W aIGmley -Hom and Associates, Inc. Parking Demand Study INTRODUCTION Kimley -Horn and Associates, Inc. has been retained to conduct a parking demand study for the proposed shopping center redevelopment, which consists of a ±40,000 square foot Wal *Mart Neighborhood Market and approximately ±9,500 square feet of additional specialty retail, to be located in the northeast quadrant of the intersection of North Highland Avenue & Green-lea Drive in the City of Clearwater, Florida. The existing shopping center is comprised of a Winn -Dixie ' store, which will be demolished and replaced by the proposed Wal *Mart Neighborhood Market, and specialty retail center. The Flexible Development Standards of the City of Clearwater allow fora parking ratio that is less than 5.0 spaces, but greater than 4.0 spaces, per 1,000 square feet of commercial retail space with the support of a parking demand study. Therefore, this parking demand study has been conducted to determine expected parking demand for the proposed site. A site location map of the proposed shopping center is provided in Appendix A. The study for conducting this parking demand study methodology was discussed and agreed upon with City of Clearwater staff on Thursday, February 8, 2007. The following report summarizes the analysis that was conducted in accordance with the agreed upon study methodology located in Appendix B. ORIGINAL RECEIVED APR Q 2 2007 PLANNING DEPARTMEW CITY OF CLEAPIMATP Report 030107.doc Page - I March 2007 1 anTd! -Hom �.. �teS, nc. Parking Demand Study STUDY METHODOLOGY In an effort to understand the parking demands for the proposed shopping center redevelopment which consists of a ±40,000 square Wal*Mart Neighborhood Market and approximately ±9,500 square feet of additional specialty retail, existing parking demands were evaluated at a similar ' site. Based upon discussions with City of Clearwater planning and traffic .staff, the existing Wal*Mart Neighborhood Market located in the northwest quadrant of Hillsborough Avenue & ' Elliot Drive, in Hillsborough County, Florida was used as the study site to determine the parking demands for the Wal*Mart Neighborhood Market. This site was chosen because there are no ' Wal*Mart Neighborhood Markets in the City of Clearwater or Pinellas County. In addition, site access and driveway locations of the chosen study site allow Wal*Mart Neighborhood Market traffic to be easily isolated. A field inventory of parking spaces at the study site was conducted and used as the basis for the parking demand data collection. Data was collected. for two weekdays (Tuesday and Thursday) ' and one Saturday, in 15- minute intervals for eight -hours (10:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m.) of a typical day, to determine the peak 15- minute parking demands for the study site. The data collection Iand analysis procedures used for the study were conducted in accordance with the agreed upon study methodology provided in Appendix B. Parking demands for the existing and future specialty retail on the site was determined based upon the Institute of Transportation Engineers' (ITE) Parking Generation, 3rd Edition (2004). ORIGINAL RECEIVED APR 02 2007 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATEP IReport 030107:doc Page - 2 March 2007 G C �n. —tGmley -Hom and A; iateS, In.c. Parking Demand Study DATA COLLECTION Existing Study Site Inventory A site plan was reviewed, to determine if the existing site plan reflects field conditions, for the existing Wal *Mart Neighborhood Market located in the northwest quadrant of Hillsborough Avenue & Elliot Drive, in Hillsborough County, Florida. A field inventory of existing parking spaces (regular and handicap) was conducted prior to the first day of the parking demand study. This information was used as the basis for the parking demand data collection. It was noted during the inventory that the study site includes a bank. outparcel located at the southeast corner of the site. Based upon discussions with City of Clearwater planning and traffic staff, this outparcel is isolated from the Wal *Mart Neighborhood Market and not consistent with the proposed site plan. Therefore parking demand data was not collected at the bank as part of this study. A site location map of the existing study site is provided in Appendix C. Reviewing the approved site plan to field conditions, the existing site plan was similar to actual field conditions, with some minor changes. The site plan specifies 200 parking spaces with three (3) spaces allocated for shopping cart corrals. However, actual site inventory shows six (6) spaces currently being utilized for shopping -cart corrals. The modified existing site plan is provided in Appendix C. Table 1 summarizes the existing square footage of the Wal *Mart Neighborhood Market study site,, and the number of available parking spaces: Shopping cart corrals are not included as available parking spaces. Table 1 Study Site Parking Inventory Wal *Mart Neighborhood Market - Hillsborough Avenue & Elliot Drive -i 'W ii a availble Building Size ` ) deg lar HandicaE � otA ( w _ . 40,314 187 7 194 ORIGINAL RE�eVED Report 030107.doc Page - 3 APR 0 2 2001 March 2007 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER �� IGmley Hom �' : AF1d ASSOGI1leS, Ins, Parking Demand Study Parking Demand Data Collection The study was conducted for eight (8) hour periods, on each study day, from 10:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. This time period was chosen because it is consistent with typical time -of -day parking demand for supermarkets presented in Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Parking Generation 3rd Edition (2004). Based upon the City's request, the data was collected for two typical weekdays on Tuesday, February 13, 2007 and Thursday, February 15, 2007. In addition typical weekend conditions were collected on Saturday, February 17, 2007. Weather conditions during the days of data collection were clear and sunny, except for approximately 2 hours (11 a.m. to 1 p.m.) of rain on Tuesday, February 13, 2007. The rain did not noticeably affect parking demand of the Wal*'Mart Neighborhood Market, as shown by the parking count data in Appendix D. During the three separate eight -hour periods, the parking lot was surveyed for parked vehicles in 15- minute intervals. Table 2 summarizes the peak demands for the eight -hour periods. Table 2 Parking Demand Data Summary Wal*Mart Neighborhood Market - Hillsborough Avenue & Elliot Drive OU k> Pea3 Y �. k r � yy NY, Nnue Parlange ReguiarH anti w� E �a andicap��Totl i e aces Vices) F �Sp .: >Da Mmei y 9 Tuesday 3:30 p.m. — 3:45 p.m. 65 4 69 Thursday 3:00 p.m. to 3:15 p.m. 53 3 56 Saturday 5:15 p.m. to 5:30 p.m. 89 4 93 ORIGINAL RECERED APR 0 2 2007 PLANNING DEPARTIAENT CITY OF CLF- APIVATEP ' Report 030107.doc Page - 4 March 2007 . I �J �I mley-Hom �IG; �IsSTtes, .Inc. Parking Demand Study PARKING DEMAND Parking demands were determined for both the proposed Wal *Mart Neighborhood Market and the specialty retail center. Wal *Mart Neighborhood Market Parkine Demands Reviewing the parking occupancy demand data at the existing facility, peak parking demand ratios (spaces per 1,000 square feet) for the existing Wal *Mart Neighborhood Market at Hillsborough Avenue & Elliot Drive in Hillsborough County, Florida was determined as the ratio of parking spaces used to the existing store size. Based upon the data collected on the three days studied, parking demands for the Wal *Mart Neighborhood Market range from 1.39 to 1.71 for typical weekdays, and was determined to be 2.31 for a typical Saturday. Table 3 summarizes these findings. Table 3 Existing Parking Demand Summary Wal *Mart Neighborhood Market H!Usborough Avenue & Elliot Drive s Peak15 °NI�nu�te�arkmg'�Demaand: �- 9, F t Ilan I I �Parlan � g�a StoreSize king De ands: DaY _x Timeof Da; D:emai►tl s ft ` do Tuesday 3:30,p.m. — 3:45 p.m. 69 40,314 1.71 Thursday 3:00 p.m. to 3:15 p.m. 56 40,314 1.39 Saturday 5:15.m. to 5:30 p.m. 93 40,314 2.31 *Parking Demand Ratio defined based upon parking spaces used per 1,000 square feet. Because the proposed Wal *Mart Neighborhood Market is primarily a grocery store, yearly peak fluctuations are not expected to change the results. Therefore, no adjustments were made to the ORIGIN& existing parking demand determined in the field. - RECEIVED APR 0 2 2007 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATEP Report 030107.doc Page - 5 March 2007 1GmieyA.Onl lm and Associates, Inc. Parking Demand Study Specialty Retail Parking Demands Since the study site did not include specialty retail, data contained in ITE Parking Generation, 3rd Edition (2004) for Land Use Code 820: Shopping Center (Appendix E) was used to determine the peak period parking demand expected for the existing and proposed specialty retail center. Based upon this information, the average peak period parking demand for a typical weekday is 2.65 vehicles per 1,000 square feet. The average peak period parking demand for ' a typical Saturday is 2.97 vehicles per 1,000 square feet. These two rates will be used to estimate the parking demand of the specialty retail uses at the proposed shopping center. Report 030107.doc Page - 6 ORIGINAL RECENED APR 02 2007 PLANNING DEPARI -MENT CITY OF CLEARWATER March 2007 1 ll l= F1 IGmley -Hom m am ASSOCiafPS, Inc. Parking Demand Study PARKING SUPPLY Parking ratios were calculated based upon the number of proposed parking spaces and proposed floor area (as shown in the site plan in Appendix A) independently for both the Wal *Mart Neighborhood Market and the specialty retail uses as well as for the overall shopping center. Table 3 summarizes the proposed site plan parking supply. Since the parking will be used for all specialty retail (existing and proposed), the specialty retail square footage is based upon the sum of the existing and proposed specialty retail. Table 4 Proposed Parking Supply Summary Wal *Mart Neighborhood Market — North Highland Avenue & Greenlea Drive � Land Useax 4 ja .. y 'c - -3 tQ Par 5250 mow- - 5 33fi 1 Bulliling Size i, yiParking Supply=, ,ywr Descripdon 4 S" -:01, X,, f (sq Rat><o* ti` ..' � .:; , Proposed Wal*Mart 185 39,729 4.66 Neighborhood Market Proposed 132 28,072 4.70 Specialty Retail Proposed Total 317 67,801 4.68 Shopping Center •Parking Supply Ratio defined in available parking supply per.1,OW square feet. ORIGINAL RECEIVED APR 0 2 2007 PLA14NING ®EPARVIENT CITY OF CLEARWATPP Report 030107.doc Page - 7 March 2007 E =F1 tGm ey- orn. m._ rnd;ASSOGIIeS; fine. Parking Demand Study PARKING ANALYSIS Parking supply provided on the proposed site was compared to the overall parking demand expected for the site. Parking ratios (available spaces /1,000 sq. ft.), were calculated to determine if the proposed parking supplied (as shown on the site plan in Appendix A) is expected to meet the site parking demands based upon the parking demand data collected at the existing Wal *Mart Neighborhood Market and the parking rates contained in ITE Parking Generation 3rd Edition. Since the proposed site includes a shared parking lot for the specialty retail and the Wal *Mart Neighborhood Market, the overall parking demand for the site was determined as the aggregate of the parking spaces needed for both land uses. Table 5 compares the expected peak weekday and weekend parking demand conditions to the proposed parking supply. Table 5 arkin Supply and Demand Comparison R KF �tt'P� L', t'`ayt C "S �/�I `� .� .y �.ff A tParking t 6 .({ 'ItS{ Peakk Weekday �` i yY.Y "T �PeakWeekend � �.zt.�.k 1 '?� z�Y•r; n{ DemandParlc><ngD_emand= '�+' � k .Land Ilse 2Bu><ldi<ng } a Parkrngs Parlung {mod �. f t»Z' rParl ngt Parti ng $.1r- e arrk><ng xParkmg Descr><p o=�S>IZe PProv><dYed Needed RatoNeededd Ratio ;Rat><o Wal *Mart Neighborhood 39 729 ' 4.66 185 1.71* 68 2.31 92 s q' ft Market Specialty 28,072 4.70 132 2.65 75 2.97 84 Retail sq. ft. Shopping 67,801 4.68 317 2.11 ** 143 2.60** 176' Center, sq. ft. Yarktng ratio based upon highest peaK 1 --)- tmnute mtervai on a typrcai weeKaay. Calculated as the ratio of total needed parking to total shopping center square footage (in 1,000 sq. ft.) As shown in Table 5, adequate parking is expected to be provided for typical peak weekday and weekend conditions. RECEIVED ' Report 030107.doc Page - 8 @R O Mafle f PLANNUG DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER 1 ' KM Hom C � and Assoaates, Inc. CONCLUSION Parking Demand Study Based upon the analysis provided, the proposed shopping center in the northeast quadrant of the intersection of North Highland Avenue & Greenlea Drive in the City of Clearwater, Florida is expected to provide adequate parking to meet the shopping center's parking demands. This analysis was based upon parking demand data collected at a similar Wal*Mart Neighborhood Market located in the northwest quadrant of Hillsborough Avenue & Elliot Drive, in Hillsborough County, Florida and parking demand estimates provided in ITE's Parking Generation, 3rd Edition (2004). Overall, the shopping center with the Wal*Mart Neighborhood Market is currently designed with an overall parking ratio of 4.68 spaces per 1,000 square feet, which is greater than the expected peak parking demand on Saturday of 2.60 spaces per 1,000 square feet. ORIGINAL RECEIVED APR © 2 2007 PLANNING DEFARjjWEPV1 CITY OF CtF4DWATF Report 030107.doc Page - 9 March 2007 APPENDIX A: Proposed Site Plan ORIGINAL RECEIVED APR 0 2 2007 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER � r {r Ir ml =l g 1 q c { i ( t , , i V S LEGEND FOR PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS r �� ioDfa uua F x ! i Y (D EXISTING SHOPPING i as a � MarosD vA�1rAr aAOaa 4 CENTER s I ' :I �I--Z� 4 �/� g W , , A Rawl Ismru® / OVERALL PROJECT rtwu - i, i mmlulal MOIOfD NGVW eun oaucf V o o = � r {r Ir ml =l 1 1 1 1 1 1 i IN W W 2 Q N CL z Li 1 JOEL LANE -*- � 2 LANE. DIVIDED ASPHALT ROADWAY 1 AADT VOLUMES= WA i EXISTING FULL J ACCESS DRIVEWAY E I ( i I i i ( I i I I I I i DOS T NG ACCESS ORR i E ' I g 1 f { i ( t , , i V S LEGEND FOR PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS u 5 �� ioDfa uua F 1 1 1 1 1 1 i IN W W 2 Q N CL z Li 1 JOEL LANE -*- � 2 LANE. DIVIDED ASPHALT ROADWAY 1 AADT VOLUMES= WA i EXISTING FULL J ACCESS DRIVEWAY E I ( i I i i ( I i I I I I i DOS T NG ACCESS ORR i E ' I g 1 0 N { i ( t , , i < M LEGEND FOR PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS u 5 �� ioDfa uua ra N S ! i Y (D EXISTING SHOPPING J 5 as a � MarosD vA�1rAr aAOaa Q W Q w 1 1 1 1 1 1 i IN W W 2 Q N CL z Li 1 JOEL LANE -*- � 2 LANE. DIVIDED ASPHALT ROADWAY 1 AADT VOLUMES= WA i EXISTING FULL J ACCESS DRIVEWAY E I ( i I i i ( I i I I I I i DOS T NG ACCESS ORR i E ' I Q Q q IWDI A MWNOMK I1w6 ml tR IIOIIr10 DNClafK NNL ^ IJ O { i ( t , , i J Q � !t LEGEND FOR PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS J Q �� ioDfa uua J O LLI 2 ti W ! (' (Y (D EXISTING SHOPPING \ as W Z LU MarosD vA�1rAr aAOaa Q W Q w CENTER 0 n 3 I ' :I �I--Z� 4 �/� g W , , A Rawl Ismru® / OVERALL PROJECT rtwu - i, i mmlulal MOIOfD NGVW eun oaucf V o o = �� ` ` Mwsm Nuvr am A>,rau PROPERTY LINE DATE 02/07/07 PROJECT NO. GROUNDWATER SHOULD BE ANMP ATED ) HUMBER SHEEET T NUMB T. CONTRACTOR'S BID SHALL DUDE C -1 PION FOR ADDRESSING THIS ISSUE 8 of 12 = SHOPS TO yIi i EXISTING 0 RESTAURANT ' I if I F f ' ° PROPOSED LANDSCAPE ISLAND 9.5' S 0 i { 2 77.57 3 M OVERALL PROJECT M i PROPERTY 11NE `. T j I y s dss7 xs t —rsa'of nik= OTTEN STREET '— — 2 LANE. DIVIDED- ol ASASPHALT T ROADWAY , AADT VOLUMES = WA 1 WE 1 ---------------------- _ ,([ A '_�� —��_� "IO LIAIIDO�JDC(YIDF %AN.f�TIW`rx . .4710 I THE PRESEE IN FLORIDA ON THIS SITE LEGEND O �rMWAfr AT YC �A E 11191 iIN O i •r am wsrr m wooanna run Qm rao� a wormwn wMa ra Oacr roc IDrAnon Fa ROl; RMS rlobll AMPM IINT wr E inr01 A/Ia MV£Opllr IIIIM MAO 6l10l. OararaL� rDIAAD rrwrx arm uowr anaQ a Erra QAr auoc aNfrso PoeA InO T9L a aAwlDCnwn w.I1S i rui aPCr >� wo IacATNw ra COMOIATNN an aq Q.uiu.�a n�.N r%1 u�i.cr�iau�ml .116O10 a� 010FIE 1RNdaaAl Ma Oala/CAI A OOOIOwIC iM � IRK lOta1 lA ►MY IYt ORMS OIl tF IMON iIK $ /ID fWrO� � OO �ILW �„TUi.� ETK .6T @I ML�IMT CNR ®re IDrera nac Ar Wu arWn rwpo sWas �' Ma1FD Waa sarrc •r r-v m 1WmmAA ro rwrolo sra. Os Ir mlocTS ara wo artarl Trarx a oLUa rELc Q`Hoot AaIR• aoa a owl mA IDf nao PARKING DATA WAL41MY BLDG. SUE S.7L SF. E709TWO RETAIL SIM Ikm SF. PROPOSED RETAIL SUM NAM Si. STANDARD SPACES 175 SPACES ACCESSBLE SPACES PAD%) ISSPACES CART CORRALS SPACES PAIDOR'FOROTHERS IM26PACE6 WAt.MMRT RATIO 4-MIIAOSSF. DEVELOP917 RATA L70 /1AMSF. CITYOFCLEARWATER 4M IIA00 SF. TOLL SITE RATIO LTG I IMay. . �� won a Mk Oloa ralxc mmaf i awLrla (mir innm roars am RID - sum u¢n R cnr maws} A .uL -NMr rE,vaLe IMac sAas cao snam .ss wL�+IMr M..r rwaA wlaz (as snwA sss mlE 1®rm IMrowo A l�aD a. I� LIAR ELA raaWR air Im a M �wmsa�i lai�cs rxis arr a I ns wxa roll fm swa iawlm) OaaAaS q INroao lN2n aRl! a5 lW0.MY A9f2 N' Erns v ac -wr wac Ir SITE DATA WALYARr PARCEL 4A7 AC DEVELOPER'S RETA84M REMAIN 3.13 AC TOTAL 7MAC =U O'✓s10omCT00A0 crr R asigrw nom mlE awar ume mlc c rrr aM xa maAaa9 BUILDING DATA aruA wu aaTN i rAY CAOA i1Ddl MIA Mr.T{ i EIYO.T IEO'0 IAa C eAr IV >� 1tl rIIAEN MOaIT IlAgri R 000[ w 1rloaom000 ro >r ��ooae�T nro IM �DA�I �� 6fl IM SITE PLAN NOTES L wTpNM 0 alTip EL E IISD A s wAMaleic wmwM a rLSrf; aPlmas a gwiMs nrus m E U.4D a raml® w-91E 1 DAQ 1WV1 AtOW /IIOY YDNOIIM 1MiM OM-aa, ID fbr. pusT, IMImAAIE w1Rlt IOgn oOagUf O�f2 al OOQ r011llii i M M Mml® OFr1E a Z fl® Al IAI6S' r RVAIY IlE1 n w Nwllrw:XrNq rAOOeSaL inmfq a oMU rwnnia AcmmES rAL rwac 1vs ati>rIa a Au rionl wD wrRws P1wL mrtr anI au min EDanrlaxs WID aoas wo osww RwowoA T. OaI1R.101ar alwalvma�inloa Tmau�a aac rA�w1w�WLw�aat Fn rara<M. TwA( amd. PRFnE Alain oPrlml -. wo [ier awalo uwm laawa uuton l ML OIIED oA1W AWL E IA10'Mf6 l ALL (MOm •.1E MC A E W Ma r. OOOIff IIRm. q Ma OrENr015 AM Ab ME A M M2 i Qa6 IMID OaAlaf MOrfD. IL vsalo RSICIUEi rIME m4rw1o1lal urn, we m E c i S1OpwDa4 m rOnGTm a Ieomarr. OIL aoR TINA u' Daa R' nma, uo n�meno' MOw m�mrc�uc w�im aclaml n maa ra awu E aaanonm R anon N Z O w C n m ��7 OE g ^ _d¢ $n"U 20 _ e g T7. x-c °mti as �o^ a Q � F � Q 1f0 u 3 Ha 0 5 & 0 0 � 0 3 3 p 0 3 x 3 O t0 Z Q R Z Z J W U) q M a9uo wT1R TnaO AT M raD 10G A M alar0 w1111 TNaE 6t Dal arap M rCT iASI Q Q q IWDI A MWNOMK I1w6 ml tR IIOIIr10 DNClafK NNL ^ IJ O q IOG A w111NL M lrrDlY 1RMIIO OMIXR OfMOQ DAiSr mmlJ tQ ETMIA i RNDND EwfA OONXIA fM6 J Q � !t LEGEND FOR PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS J Q �� ioDfa uua J O LLI 2 ti W ravvan as. wo artrol (' (Y (D XI [W eMr DaNlw. O as W Z LU MarosD vA�1rAr aAOaa Q W Q w rmrio Msc to EurAO 0 n 3 - raiOID 1aA0ADRI UWaICAIr1W �I--Z� 4 �/� g W , , A Rawl Ismru® / of T L) J = U rtwu - i, i mmlulal MOIOfD NGVW eun oaucf V o o = �� ` ` Mwsm Nuvr am A>,rau t�- Z U DATE 02/07/07 PROJECT NO. GROUNDWATER SHOULD BE ANMP ATED ) HUMBER SHEEET T NUMB T. CONTRACTOR'S BID SHALL DUDE C -1 PION FOR ADDRESSING THIS ISSUE 8 of 12 APPENDIX B: Methodology Statement ORIGINAL RECEIVED APR 0 2 2007 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER r. PARKING OCCUPANCY METHODOLOGY STATEMENT ' Wal*Mart Neighborhood Market — City of Clearwater, Florida Store No. 4667 -00 North Highland Avenue & Greenlea Drive ' Pinellas County, Florida ' Introduction This parking occupancy study will evaluate parking demands for the proposed shopping center, which consists of a ±40,000 (approximately) square foot Wal *Mart Neighborhood Market store and ±10,000 (approximately) square feet of retail, to be ' located in the northeast quadrant of the intersection of North Highland Avenue & Greenlea Drive in the City of Clearwater, Florida. The Flexible Development Standards of the City of Clearwater allow for a parking demand study to support a ' parking ratio of less than 5.0 spaces, but greater than 4.0 spaces, per 1,000 square feet of commercial retail space. ' The parking occupancy study will evaluate parking demands at an existing Wal *Mart Neighborhood Market store, located in the northwest quadrant of Elliot Drive & Hillsborough Avenue, in Hillsborough County, Florida as the study site. Parking demands will be determined for full occupancy of the existing site with the proposed Wal *Mart Neighborhood Market store. Site Inventory Parking spaces will be determined for the proposed shopping center, based upon the proposed site plan, which includes a ±40,000 (approximately) square foot Wal *Mart Neighborhood Market store and ±10,000 (approximately) square feet of retail, to be located in the northeast quadrant of the intersection of North Highland Avenue & Greenlea Drive in the City of Clearwater, Florida. n i IJ I G A field inventory of parking spaces will be conducted at an existing Wal *Mart Neighborhood Market store, located in the northwest quadrant of Elliot Drive & Hillsborough Avenue, in Hillsborough County, Florida. This information will be used as the basis for the parking occupancy data collection. Parking Occupancy Data Collection A parking occupancy study will be conducted for three eight -hour (8) periods from 10:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m., which is consistent with time -of -day parking demand for supermarkets presented in Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Parking Generation 3'd Edition. Data will be collected on two (2) typical weekdays (Tuesday and Thursday) and a Saturday. The parking lot will be surveyed for parked vehicles in 15- minute intervals throughout the eight -hour (8) periods for each day. Data will be analyzed and summarized to determine the peak parking occupancy for each of the three days of study. ORIGINAL. RECEIVED APR 0 2 2007 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITE' OF CLEARWATER Parking Occupancy Adjustments Adjustments will be made through trip generation rates to account for existing store vacancies and peak season fluctuations based upon Land Use Code 820: Shopping Center, contained in ITE Parking Generation, 3rd Edition. Analysis Scenarios Parking occupancies will be collected for each of the days of study and a parking rate per 1,000 square feet will be determined based upon the square footage of the ±40,000 (approximately) square foot Wal*Mart Neighborhood Market store and ±10,000 (approximately) square feet of retail. Report Analysis .findings will be summarized in a report provided to the City of Clearwater. ORIGINAL RECEIVED APR 02 2007 PLANNING ®EPARTMEN1 CITY OF CIEARWATFF APPENDIX C: Existing Study Site Plan ORIGINAL RECEIVED APR 0 2 2007 PLANNING DEPARTMENT MY OF CLEARWATEP ORIGINAL REMENTIAL RECEWED OSLIN STREET �� APR 02 2007 1r $37fiD0- E_31b73= (MJ-Y__ S 5316.00- E .120.00' (M) S 5316'00- E 300:00' (M) ---- -- - - -- - -- _- r `; - - - -- - -- , PLANNING ®EPARTMEN' GRAPx(c SCALE CITY OFCLEARW i ALTER Iv �I I� �j 3j itl i n g! j (DP T86T > y ' nl i E 1 I Inch = fi0 M1 jgatlsiv�' BUILDING DATA a : S� - yL----'s s5icao f- ,- so.o6•TG)'"�_� s Rua Arec.. MARKET NEIp60 MARKET 4 j _ i fiY,y @p�D 0314 S i (t) OA DING HEIGHT, NEIGHBORHOOD MARKET 3w MAXIMUM BY CODE w \�� I FLOOR NAP S AREA FIAT SITE TOTAL R als R MAINTENANCE MAXIMUM BY CODE am ACC s "N" PANEL \ : S Ss16001E : Y DOUNE SPARK W/ PROlEC1M1E TWd1 S CONCRETE i Ullflt misnur * '°^� w'EAa 9oEWALx SINE roTAL 1z9x S 5316'00- E 120.00' M S1rNE fi1� _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - - _ _ YAKINUI NUMBER OF FLOORS BY CODE 2SOD •• 1• •• •• •• •• - •• ••• • _ 1 SCREEN WALL "Me SPWIACIM j PROYIDED •` \\` ELEV. 7.00 T.0a 4:1 rTi4CE 7RA rn W ! RM (W �.) is (t3 a". 11.00 _ (( 3 �/ Y \\ -- CUTAPACTON PAD ! CONCRETE S' SIDE ,W RGa) - SOU7FRESf 1B4 * STORMWATER 'A .\_ Y:� POND NO. 1 9:N DOCK WELL E SCREEN RICO 6 SIDEWALK WOOD - . \ Kz (OM AC + / -) 65'q (2 BA`n ITW) ' IN •\ p\ Bo OM EL aoD i i - /�.�,.��. FtA1 A[ras \ 2$ 1R EL (S/F1NID) 4 ' II \ \\ YR EL B - A 4" •\ \•, 100 YR FL _ - 10. � � ,t - LEA-ISE LOT \ •' tt 'q1 i t \ CONSTRUCTION AREA / A. itC L L A (NUT INCLUDED) $ 5 N N R NUE PARKING DATA •\ I � U iHt 1 �, _ A 9? PARKING OITDIA FETAL. 01 , : , I WAL MART tI � REQUIRED PARKING SPACES (1 3/200 TOTAL GFA) 202 SPATES 0' CNAN- dIIWC(1�t t t - - tz ASSOCIATE 1 1, srANOAID SPACES (9.Sk1 ,00 SPACES FENCE \ III i PARKING SPACE c,NNI I 1 ACCEEBIE SACFS ((,Yd 7 SPACE ( 10.314 SF. < +/) i 7 TOTAL PARKING SPANfS P'VIDED 2L0 SPACE31M 41 1! - F.F. - 12.00 I 8 1 S/ 10ti `j y PAWING RATIO PER HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY IA6 SP / 1000 S k € t 1 (nv AL (DAM ON 'W314 Sn A� ACCESSIBLE n ' CAaT C 1i *PER WER -MAR E� AOFMAZ IS PARKING HAS \• `?� ;fi� I AREA ALONG ("P.) > ' BEER PRONGED. \• b 1 EPC EDA - 1$(001 c� - (TYPE) 57:E i ACRES OR 1752 6tSd; FT) E PROPOSED f tl Ir €i X A O d A 8 �_ - SEGMENTAL 4 / /// CONCRETE SIDEWALK WALE D7PJ y b,PJ iTTPJ PI ASSO SP�AGS FunRE LEAs LOT AREA ro R 4 § 4 P 1 ° PaarosfD 31 SITE DATA BE REPT FREE AM MATERIALS OF e 4 4 FII . ' 3 2 't' - j !� SITE LOCATIOM NORTHWEST CORNEA OF HCLSBOROUGH AVENUE AND BY CONTRACTOR IB -- A 10' YaNU1FNf 1 FTLL AC= ZONING CASSFICATIO!` k i OLIDONLaoic u. (GENEDALT - C-0 LAND USE Cuti9TCAntWE RESDENT& - RFS-6 SIGN rs TAN FOUO NUMBERS: f 006249.0000 LEGEND p¢ LOCAL A1RSDICTI E HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY. FLORIDA y ij (rro) 2 i U6 OTREES TO BE PRESERVED -- NSCHRO640M MAW(Ef (SEE LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR DETAILS) / . • B �m (NOIDINC lrAS lAT1 ; NETS AC (t) 4 B e B ` _ x Q ,per tGDROGROSS s E� �A AREA 03.604 SF :3 FULL AO.1s o ! In =Y PERCENT NPENWOUS - E9 (x 7O[S *MA*M PERMITTED BY CODE) (>p NF `"•• � TOTAL PERVIOUS AREA 97.762 SF PERCENT PERVIOUS 31% (36N MINIMUM PEFtMr D BY COOS) -1- "(O Eby As RECLINED BY CODE AIO BAS - FL "EL (NdCNS A D AREAS FLOW OF 100-YEAR F FLOOD; BASE FLOW "ELEVATIONS FEMA IN PANEL HAZARD 120100$ ARE DETERMINED. IV FENA FIN PANEL N0. 12072 090: GATED ARIL n. ,9a. as ca .i R 1^P NOTES CONCRETE > Wur SANK PARKING AM ATNNBEoF SVDRMWATER AREA SHALL 1. SEE SIFSR I FOR SWAM AN STRIPING UWAnONS AD REQUIFENENS SIDEWALK '�. -COORDINATED WITH THE RANK TO /��. ENSIURE THAT ACCESS ro THE 2. SEE SHEETS B FOR SITE UWTNC LAYOUT AND INFDINATDR shim 1 N yW�� . i _ , LIMITS BANK IS HOT E FESTRICTED PROPOSED BANK x CONTRACTOR SHALL REFER 70 ARQITMNIAL PLANS FOR PRECISE BUILDING Do EMSIOM% MUMC U16TY &AT cORR9 LS F tjji ENTRANCE LOCATIONS. AND EXACT LOCATKNS AND DIMENSIONS OF VESDOBUIE 001 PORCHES, RAPS TRIUM "+ I ��OR ro � � OF THE LEGAL DES IPTION DOOM OOWNSPOUTS, AND FOULARDS N NALDINC SIDEWALKS NO AT TRUCK WELL PETAMMC WA1S 250 R. 4 � ,..� 005TNG ENTRANCE RUM TO ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR LOCATIONS AND MOUNTING INSTRUCTIONS FOR WALL MONIED SONS 4. TFE OOTRACIOR SHALL AAY FOR AND OBTAN NECESSARY PE70BR FROM HIILWOMIC H COUNTY 4 � . • � A PART OF SEPOE cOLRLDNarw WORK. '. If Dousms ELEV. LOG j ( PART OF LOT An OF EW T AND HARRISON SUBDIVISION AS RECORDED IN L ON-SITE DWE3NSDMrs AND RAN ARE N FACE ff CURS ON EDGE W LANE UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. SWAG GATE s PLAT BOON 32, PACE 17 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF HILLSBOROUGH L auARTm a CART CORRALS (3) PER COAL MART NEO IIB3NOT5 S7TMMWATER POND N0. 2 - _ COUNTY, FLORIDA TOGETHER WITH LOTS t THROUGH 7. AND LOT E U OF (0.16 AC + / -) A JANE TERRACE, AS'REOORDED IN PLAT BOOK 35, PARE 99 OF THE PUBLIC 708 - 99 RECORDS OF HILLSB WGN COUNTY, FLORIDA, ALL BEING MORE 7. ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES WILL BE PROPERLY SIGNED AND STRIPED N ACCORDANCE WITH FLORIDA JIM - FL TAG ' PARTICULARLY BED AS FOLLOWS: STATUTE 310. lIE MANUAL ON UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES, OR OTl10t APPLICABLE STANDARDS. . i L THE eNcat m CERTIFIES THAT THE SITE HAS 8@I DESNIED N woo ACCORDANCE WITH TIE 25 YR EL (FDOT) - 9M ti� 2:1 t c . COMMENCE AT THE ' ORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LLOT -A- OF EWOT D AMERICANS WITH OMASIUT S ACT 100 YR EL (Fool) - 8.37 a 21 HARRISON SUSDIVI9 AS RECORDED M PLAT BOOK 32. PAGE 17 OF THE (ma y t ,t {, 6 PUSUC RECORDS OF HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY. FLORIDA: THENCE ALONG THE S. ALT. ON� -STI: PARKING SPACES WILL BE STRIPED AND SIGNED N ACCORDANCE WIN THE MANUAL ON ROOT NOEK ALL ! APT'} NORTHWESTERLY RI T -OF -WAY LINE OF EWOT DRM S.3556'46 -W., URRDRY TRAFFIC CONTROL DENCS' LATEST M (1UNUSS OTHERWISE NOTED HEREIN). DIRECTIONAL ) 4 ZOiNE ' t LAWNS OF 200.00 FEET TO PUNT OF BEGINNING THENCE CONTINUE ALONG SAID ARROWS AND SNP BARS SOUL BE STRIPED IN WE4TE UNLESS 01HERVISE NOTED ON SHEETS 9 B 10. 'i, (( i11 t� 1 i v . y TMy ASSODATE PAINNG SPACES TO S STRIPED YFLiDN AND CUSTOMER PAWING STALL BE STRIPED M WM7E .9 t l I, s.1 3 NORTHWESTERLY W OF -WAY LINE, 53556'46'W., 395.82 FEET, THENCE ACCESSIBLE STRIPING 94ALL BE PER CODE. IT SMALL BE THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY ro PROPERLY SEW RELOCATED 6• A SRN; � . (1T - DEPARTING SAD N THWESTERLY RIGHT -OF -WAY LINE ALONG THE AND STRIPE THE SITE N ACCORDANCE WITH APPLICABLE STANDARDS AROlNO SOUTNIRIISi POND ro d. �I, _ - -�__ NORTHEASTERLY NDARY OF THOSE LANDS DESCRIBED N O.R. BOOK 10. NO IRRIGATION SY5IFAI OR LANDSCAPING SIAl1 BE INSULTED N ANY COUNTY OR STATE RHOR- OF-WAY SNRMWATER POND NO. 2 + 11512, PAGE 41 OF'iHE PUBLIC RECORDS OF HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY, WITHOUT ISSUANCE OF APPROPRIATE RICK -OF -WAY USE FOUST. '° ` FLORIDA. N.54'0YWw.. 150.00 FEEF: THENCE ALONG THE NORTHWESTERLY 11. r 4 ° '�' Mb�IUMENT SIb'1'i BOUNDARY OF SAID`�LANDS. S.3556'46'W., 330.01 FEET TO THE CO LY WITH ALL APP ONIDCFS THAT THE SITE AND ITS 9AHSEauoNr BuTDWNe RfTO175 SMALL _1 1- /- C- p-yW^�-/YT"nTETr- S'f77 -rr _. O _ 5 _ COMPLY YAIHI ALL 571E PLAN APPROVAL COIDIlIONS 6 `7 o V !7 V V .A.7 /7 /'E W G /W Y G 17 NORTHF�ISTERLY PoG T--OF-WAY LINE OF HILLSBOROUGH AVENUE (STATE 12 ALL STRUCIRIE% INCLUDING BUFFER WALLS. NETAHM WALLS, SONACE, ETC REQUIRE SEPARATE ROAD THENCE ALONG SAID NORTHEASTERLY RIGHT -OF -WAY LINE SADING PINTS N.5358' 18 -W., 87.24 FEET TO THE EASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY UNE OF MEVENS STREET; - ENCE ALONG SAID EASTERLY RIGHT -OF -WAY UNE, 13. SE SHEET 2 FOR THE FOUNDATION SW-SUE EP ACE PREPARATION I'M N.0035'S5 -E., 907-5 FEET TO THE SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF LOTS B L4. THE EXTERIOR PANT FINISH WILL BE OF A NATURAL TOE OR EARN TORE THROUGH 13 OF SAI JANE TERRACE; THENCE ALONG SAID SOUTHWESTERLY LINE D THE NORTHEASTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 14, 15. THE TRASH COMPACIOU WILL BE SCREENED WITH AN ARCHnucTRWLY FINISHED MASONRY WALL f -- _ S.53T6'00 -E.. 759.44 FEET TO THE PUNT OF BEGINNING 1S, FUOOOPIAN COMPENSATION NOT REQUIRED DUE 70 ONUMIED BASIN (OD TAMPA RATS. ' S CONTAINING 7.1943 �-ES• MORE OR LESS. CC" W Amciate� Inc 6 ve inh,, PlannFNg d fnEirmmentd C6nsdtananh £a Na 695- 1220 Tech BouleWTrd Tampa Florida 33619 Phone: (813) 620 -1460 For (813) 620 -1542 "w- kimley- honn.c6m N�o INMNWL W:nKI1..1 x mma Carla Ilmllm IOeI N N w1aAn, s mllq a MB® tK Tar x WeR1N nFPaeE AIO adN Nat W4W R WAt 11@MEII IE1aE 6110 000721 arrllra ox 71N 9oOAWxr WFNUr aen01 AVENQALNI NO ANf Aa1 �1' bafY- A�AIq K fill N NM- M WNNIT A IOILYtiNl11 210 N ®rlq K Li Ni n N m � a_ o a = U � C) � 0 a e 5� e e er gz, pF t LU 0 6 o g d QQQ� I LO Q �WW SCAM: 1.50 DRAWDN NAME 62668P01 smQ No.: 3 APPENDIX D: Count Data and Parking Demands ORIGIN& RECEIVED APR 0 2 2007 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER J ' Wal *Mart Parking Occupancy Study Wal *Mart Only Parking Counts (Existing. Conditions) Hillsborough County, Florida Store No. 5255 Date: Tuesday Fehruary 13. 2007 Start Time Wal*Mart Parking. Occupancy Counts Total Parking Counts Existing Parking Ratio (veh /S.F.) Regular Handicap 10:00 50 3 53 1.31 10:15 47 3 50 1.24 10:30 54 1 55 1.36 10:45 ' 58 2 60 1.49 11:00 57 3 60 1.49 11:15 60 2 62 1.54 11:30 60 3 63 1.56 11:45 50 4 54 1.34 12:00 54 4 58 1.44 12:15 54 2 56 1.39 12:30 59 4 63 1.56 12:45 54 1 55 1.36 1:00 49 2 51 1.27 1:15 41 4 45 1.12 1:30 47 3 50 1.24 1 :45 48 4 52 1.29 2:00 48 4 52 1.29 2:15 40 1 41 1.02 2:30 48 3 51 1.27 2:45 64 3 1 67 1.66 3:00 52 4 56 1.39 3:15 59 4 63. 1.56_ k is `, 3`30 " .. ,,`fir 5�; ��'' t - ,^" ? `f ., ^ 469 �°..,+< ..- •�' ,., 3:45 58 3 61 1.51 4:00 62 2 64 1.59, 4:15 56 . 1 57 1.41 4:30 54 3 57 1.41 4:45 48 2 50 1.24 5:00 52 2 54 1.34 5:15 55 2 57 1.41 5:30 54 2 56 1.39 5:45 56 1 57 1.41 8 -Hour Count Totals 1,713 86 1,799 Total Number of Spaces 194 �� I Existing Wal *Mart S.F. (KSF) 40.314 Spaces /KSF 4.81 NAL RECERED APR 0 2 2001 PLANNING ®EPARieviW; CIW 0 n CLEARMi, -rr-r ' Wal*Mart Parking Occupancy Study Wal *Mart Only Parking Counts (Existing Conditions) ' Hillsborough County, Florida Store No. 5255 Date: Thursday. February 15. 2007 Start Time Wal*Mart Parking Occupancy Counts Total Parking Counts Existing Parking Ratio (veh /S.F.) Regular Handicap 10:00 33 2 35 0.87 10:15 41 5 46 1.14 10:30 49 6 55 1.36 10:45 41 4 45 1.12 11:00 45 5 50 1.24 11:15 51 4 55 1.36 11:30 45 4 49 1.22 11:45 48 3 51 1.27 12:00 49 2 51 1.27 12:15 49 3 52 1.29 12:30 49 3 52 1.29 12:45 50 3 53 1.31 1:00 52 2 54 1.34 1:15 42 3 45 1.12 1:30 42 3 45 1.12 1:45 46 2 48 1.19 2:00 47 3 50 1.24 2:15 47 3 50 1.24 2:30 53 2 55 1.36 2:45 51 2 53 1.331 3:15 AMM 52 2 54 _ 1.34 3:30 52 2 54 1.34 3:45 50 2 52 1.29 4:00 47 4 51 1.27 4:15 48 3 51 1.27 4:30 50 2 52 1.29 4:45 51 2 53 1.31 5:00 52 2 54 1.34 5:15 46 1 47 1.17 5:30 42 2 44 1.09 5:45 41 2 43 1.07 8 -Hour Count Totals 1,514 91 1,605 Total Number of Spaces 194 Existing. Wal *Mart S.F. (KSF) 40.314 Spaces /KSF 4.81 ORDINAL RECEIVED APR 0 2 2007 PLANNING DEPARTPVIEN`ll CITY OF CLEARWATEP Wal *Mart Parking Occupancy Study Wal *Mart Only Parking Counts (Existing Conditions) Hillsborough County, Florida Store No. 5255 natP. Saturday February 17. 2007 Start Time Wal *Mart Parking Occupancy Counts Total Parking Counts Existing Parking Ratio (veh/S.F.) Regular Handicap 10:00 46 2 48 1.19 10:15 52 3 55 1.36 10:30 62 4 66 1.64 10:45 62 3 65 1.61 11:00 59 2 61 1.51 11:15 66 3 69 1.71 11:30 71 3 74 1.84 11:45 67 5 72 1.79 12:00 69 3 72 1.79 12:15 65 3 68 1.69 12:30 61 3 64 1.59 12:45 64 4 68 1.69 1:00 71 4 75 1.86 1:15 58 2 60 1.49 1:30 72 6 78 1.93 1:45 70 4 74 1.84 2:00 66 3 69 1.71 2:15 64 4 68 1.69 2:30 69 5 74 1.84 2:45 67 5 72 1.79 3:00 71 5 76 1.89 3:15 69 5 -74 ._. _ - __1.84 3:30 75 5 80 1.98 3:45 55 6 61 1.51 4:00 72 6 78 1.93 4:15 70 4 74 1.84 4:30 81 4 85 2.11 4:45 83 4 87 2.16 5:00 81 5 86 2.13 5:30 75 3 78 73 1.93 5:45 72 6 78- 1.93 8 -Hour Count Totals 2,174 128 2,302 Total Number of Spaces 194 Existing Wal *Mart S.F. (KSF) 40.314 Spaces /KSF 4.81 APPENDIX E: ITE Parking Generation 3r1 Edition Parkin g Rates ORIGINAL RECEIVED APR 02 2007 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATE Land Use: 820 Shopping Center Average Peak Period Parking Demand vs: 1,000 sq. ft. GLA On a: Monday through Thursday (Non- December) Peak Period 11:00 -3:00 .m.; 6:00 -7:00 p.m. Number of Study Sites 19 Average Size of Study Sites 331,000 sq. ft. GLA Average Peak Period Parking Demand 2.65 vehicles per 1,000 sq. ft. GLA Standard Deviation 0.98 Coefficient of Variation 37% Range 1.33 =5.58 vehicles per 1,000 sq. ft. GLA 85th Percentile 3.35 vehicles per 1,000 sq. ft. GLA 33rd Percentile 2.26 vehicles per 1,000 sq. ft. GLA Monday - Thursday Non - December Peak Period Parking Demand y 10000 as 8000 :c d > 6000 L 4000 °- u 2000 o- 0 P = 1.60x + 140 ,� R2= 0.98 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 x = 1,000 sq. ft. GLA • Actual Data Points Fitted Curve - - - - Average Rate ORIGINAL RECEIVED APR 0 2 2007 PLANNING DEPARTMEW CITY OF CLEARWATFF Institute of Transportation Engineers 199 Parking Generation, 3rd Edition Land Use: 820 Shopping Center Average Peak Period Parking Demand vs: 1,000 sq. ft. GLA On a: Saturday (Non- December) Saturday Non - December Peak Period Parking Demand N 12000 Peak Period 1:00 -2:00 p.m. Number of Study Sites 20 Average Size of Stud Sites 549,000 sq. ft. GLA Average Peak Period Parking Demand 2.97 vehicles per 1,000 sq. ft. GLA Standard Deviation 0.71 Coefficient of Variation 24% 95% Confidence Interval 2.66 -3.28 vehicles per 1,000 sq. ft. GLA Range ' 1.85 -4.82 vehicles per 1,000 sq. ft. GLA 85th Percentile 3.56 vehicles per 1,000 sq. ft. GLA. 33rd Percentile 2.65 vehicles per 1,000 sq. ft. GLA Saturday Non - December Peak Period Parking Demand N 12000 as 10000 8000 6000 m L 4000 a 11 2000 o. P = 3.37x - 94 R2 = 0.98 0 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 r x = 1,000 sq. ft. GLA • Actual Data Points Institute of Transportation Engineers Fitted Curve - - - - Average Rate ORIGINAL RECIE6 D APR 0 2 2007 PLANNING DEPARTMEN) CITY OF CLEARWATEP 201 Parking Generation, 3rd Edition ❑■ Wal *Mart — Clearwater (Highland) Store No. 4667, WNM City of Clearwater, Florida I ORIGIM RECENE® MAY 2 5 2007 ®F C FAR �ER� ' Ci11f Wal *Mart — Clearwater (Highland) Store No. 4667, WNM City of Clearwater, Florida I ®D Kimley -Horn C7® and Associates, Inc. 7 Pr ep ared for: Wal*Mart Stores East, Inc. 2001 SE 10 h Street ' Bentonville, AR 72716 -0550 ®D Kimley -Horn C7® and Associates, Inc. 7 © Kimley -Hom and Associates, Inc. May 2007 Tampa, Florida 047253651 ®D Kimley -Horn C7® and Associates, Inc. 7 1 I t t t 1 1 Wal *Mart — Clearwater (Highland) Store No. 4667 -00, WNM City of Clearwater, Florida Prepared for: Wal*Mart Stores East, Inc. 2001 SE 10th Street Bentonville, Arkansas 72716 -0550 Prepared by: Kimley -Horn and Associates, Inc. 10117 Princess Palm Avenue, Suite 300 Tampa, Florida 33610 -8304 © Kimley -Hom and Associates, Inc. May 2007 Tampa, Florida 047253651 SRI I RECEND MAY 2 5 2007 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER h �� ^ ill �A,Ai L Gy FL #625' This document, together with the concepts and designs .presented herein, as an instrument of service, is intended only for the specific purposes and client for which it was prepared. Reuse of and improper reliance on this document without written authorization and adaptation by Kimley -Hom and Associates, Inc. shall be without liability to Kimley -Horn and Associates, Inc. t WAL *MART — CLEARWATER (HIGHLAND), FLORIDA STORE NO. 4667-00 ' HIGHLAND AVE. AND GREENLEA DR. Table of Contents Section No. ' Project Description ................................... .................... ............ 1 ' Pre- Development Calculations ..................... ............................... 2 Pre - Development Narrative Pre - Development Basin Map Pre- Development Node Diagram Curve Number Calculations Time of Concentration Calculations Pre- Development ICPR Input Data Pre - Development ICPR Node Results Post - Development Calculations .................... ............................... 3 Post Development Narrative Post - Development Basin Map Post- Development Node Diagram ' Curve Number Calculations Pond Stage- Storage Calculations Pond Underdrain Calculations Buoyancy Calculations Post- Development ICPR Input Data Post - Development ICPR Node Results ' Post - Development ICPR Time Series Results Storm Tabs Profile of Hydraulic Grade Line Appendix............................................... ............................... 4 ' A.1 - Location Map A.2 - Aerial Photograph A.3 - Soils Map ' A.4 - Quad Map A.5 - FIRM Map A.6 - Stormwater Management System Operation and Maintenance Program 1 A.7 - TR -55 Curve Numbers A.8 - Report of Geotechnical Exploration prepared by MACTEC Engineering and Consulting, Inc. Dated November 10, 2006 A.9 - FLUCFCS Map Section 1 Project Description t 1 i WAL *MART - CLEARWATER (HIGHLAND), FLORIDA STORE NO. 4667-00 HIGHLAND AVENUE AND GREENLEA DRIVE PROJECT DESCRIPTION Introduction This report was developed to describe the proposed surface water management system design associated with the redevelopment of a 7.80 ( + / -) acre site containing a Wal -Mart Neighborhood Market, various other retail shops, associated infrastructure, and stormwater facility. 730 acres of land will be treated and retained as part of the stormwater management plan; a total of 0.47 acres will remain undisturbed and flow as it had in pre - development conditions off -site to the Highland Avenue right of way and to the existing swale to the North, and 0.03 acres will flow into a City inlet as it did in the pre- development condition. The proposed design is for a stormwater system consisting of two (2) on -site dry detention ponds for treatment and an underground stormwater vault for attenuation. The ponds have been designed with the northest portion of the site draining to Pond A and south and west portion of the site draining to the Pond B. Pond A and Pond B will discharge to the stormwater attenuation vault which will discharge to a City of Clearwater storm drain in Greenlea Drive. Discharge from the ponds above the treatment elevation will be through engineered control structures. The two (2) ponds have been designed to treat the required volume of runoff through infiltration via underdrain with filter fabric. The vault was designed to reduce the runoff from the site into the Greenlea Drive storm drain for the 25 -year, 24 hour storm event. A pre- application meeting was held with Richard Alt -on November 22, 2006 (See notes Appendix A.10. Suggestions made by SWFWMD staff at this meeting have been incorporated into the design of the proposed surface water management system. Location The proposed Wal -Mart development is located on the northwest corner of Highland Avenue and Greenlea Drive, in Section 02, Township 29 South, Range 15 East of Pinellas County, Florida (See reap Appendix A.1). Currently the site has 77,156 s.f. of existing retail and grocery building area. Existing building area of 58,567 s.f will be demolished and replaced with a 39,729 s.f Wal -Mart grocery store and 9,483 s.f of retail; a net reduction in square footage of 9,354. Existing Conditions The existing retail plaza discharges to a number of areas. The northeast section of the site drains to the existing pond in the north east corner. Runoff resulting from most of the parking field and the buildings all flow southward to the Greenlea Drive right of way where it is captured by grate inlets at the project entrances. The western side of the site generally flows westward to the Highland Avenue right -of -way. The post - development design of the stormwater management facility will discharge solely to the city stormwater system located beneath the westernmost grate in the Greenlea Drive right of way. The post- development discharge at this location does not exceed the pre - development discharge at that location. The flowrate at this location does not include the runoff of the 0.47 acres of undisturbed land which will drain as.it had in pre- development conditions. Since this is an open drainage basin, the allowable discharge is the peak rate at which runoff leaves the proposed project area by gravity under existing conditions. The precipitation depths were determined using the SWFWMD 25 year, 24 hour rainfall map and the Soil Conservation Service's Type II Florida Modified 24 -hour rainfall distribution with an Antecedent Moisture Condition II. Water Quantity The propose system consists of two (2) dry detention ponds and an underground stormwater vault. The stormwater run -off will be collected by storm drain and then drains to either Pond A or Pond B where it is treated via underdrain. The bottom of both ponds will be lined. The water will then drain from each of the ponds to the stormwater vault for attenuation. The vault has been designed to reduce the runoff from the site into the stormdrain on Greenlea Drive by the southwest part of the property for the 25 -year, 24 hour storm event. According to the FEMA Firm Panel 1251390107 H; rev. May 17, 2005, the site is located in Zone X (Area of moderate or minimal hazard). (Appendix A.5). Water Quality Water quality for the project will be provided by an underdrain with filter fabric system. Treatment methodology for this system is taken from SWFWMD's dry detention criteria based on the requirements in Chapter 5.2b of the "Environmental Resource Permitting ' Information Manual" The percolation rates of the underdrains are based on FDOT road and bridge specifications. The dry detention ponds are designed to provide treatment of the first one -half inch of run -off from the 7.30 acres ( + / -) of the site that will be redeveloped. This gives a total treatment volume of 13,268 W. The treatment volume in Pond A is 4,754 ft3 and the treatment volume in Pond B is 8,885 ft3 for a total treatment volume of 13,639 ft3. Treatment is achieved at elevations of 36.80' and 36.93' for ponds A and B. ' Environmental Considerations There are no wetland or wetland buffer impacts on the site. r Section 2 Pre- Development Calculations t ' Pre- Development Calculations Wal *Mart Store #4667 -00, Clearwater (Highland), Florida, Highland and Greenlea NARRATIVE Based on the Phoenix Land Surveying and Engineering, LLC ( Pheonix) survey of existing site conditions for the project site, a pre - development basin map was developed (see this section). After the basins were adequately delineated for areas, the soil types and hydrologic group of each basin were determined (taken from the SCS Soils Report for Pasco County and from the Geotechnical Exploration Report by Maetec Engineering and Consulting Inc. 2). Time of concentrations (Tc) and weighted curve numbers (CN) were calculated based upon existing conditions as shown on the survey conducted by Phoenix. Like many developed sites, most Tc values were determined to be less than 10 minutes; however, a minimum of 10 minutes for each jbasin has been used in the ICPR modeling. The Tc and CN values were calculated using Technical Release 55: Urban Hydrology for Small Watersheds, 2nd Edition (TR -55) 3. t The 25 year, 24 hour rainfall event has been used to establish the pre - development discharge from the site. Based on discussion with City of Clearwater staff, the stormwater design is modeled to reflect half credits for the existing building area that is too be demolished. Thus, basins B -1 and B -2 show a total of 0.68 acres of Open Space (good conditions), which represents half of the existing building area that will be demolished. Most of the water drains south and then around the Winn -Dixie to discharge into the Greenlea Drive right of way near the front of the Winn- Dixie. Upon entering the right of way it flows west to be collected by the curb inlet located near the following ingress /egress. The roofs of the existing structures on the eastern side of the property direct run -off to the rear of the buildings. The remaining water from the eastern structures flows north into the dry detention pond which is connected by underdrain to a ditch that discharges to Sunset Point Road. Run -off from the structures along the northern boundary discharge off -site into the adjacent property to the north. The body of the parking lot flows southwest cutting across- the parking field, where it is then captured by the grate inlet located in the western access point along the southern boundary. The grate inlets along the western boundary serve their respective access drives while the southernmost of the two also receives run -off from the undisturbed wooded area. Basin S -2, which contains the remaining wooded area, drains into the Highland Avenue right of way where it then flows roughly 80' south into the curb inlets. The pre - development data was entered into iCPR and the model run for the 25 year -24 hour storm event. Based on the output from the program, the discharge is as follows: Node Name Basin Area. 25 year -24 hour Event N Discharge 0.39 acres 2.02 cfs NE Discharge 1.49 acres 0.18 cfs ROW Discharge W 0.77 acres 3.78 cfs SE Discharge 1.51 acres 6.81 cfs SW Discharge 3.65 acres 19.10 cfs Total Pre - Development Peak Discharge from Wal -Mart parcel and Offsite Runoff 7.81 acres 31.89 efs The pages included in this section are as follows: EXISTING CONDITIONS DATA 0 Pre- Development Basin Map • Pre - Development Node Diagram • Curve Number Calculations • Time of Concentration Calculations • Pre - Development ICPR Input Data • Pre- Development ICPR Node Min/Max (25 year -24 hour) r� ' 'The SCS Soils Report for Pasco County can be found in the Appendix A.3. 2The Geotechnical Exploration Report can be found in the Appendix A.8. 3TR -55 runoff curve numbers for different hydrologic soil groups can be found in the Appendix A.7. t s i i e Pre- Development Basin Map a E oa n 0 0 N O J Pre - Development Node Diagram ICPR Pre - Development Node Min /Max #4667 Clearwater (Hi Nodes A Stage /Area V Stage /Volume T Time /Stage M Manhole Basins 0 Overland Flow U SCS Unit Hydro S Santa Barbara Links P Pipe W Weir C Channel D_Drop Structure B Bridge R Rating Curve H Breach T:N Discharge U: B -3 T:ROW Discharge W U: S -2 U: S -3 U: S -1 U: OS -1 A: SWALE U: B -2 T:SE Discharge T:SW Discharge U: B -1 U:9-4 Interconnected Channel and Pond Routing Model (ICPR) ©20021Streamline Technologies, Inc. A:NE Discharge R:Underdrain 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Curve Number Calculations C=" Kimley- Horn M an.dAssociates; Im Pre vs. Post Runoff Analysis Composite Curve Number (CN) Project Information Project Name: Wal -Mart Clearwater (Highland) Store #4667 -00 KHA Project #: 047253651 Designed by: NRL 5/14/2007 Revised by: Revised by: PRE - DEVELOPMENT Land Use: Basin Urban Land Open Space Good Conditions Residential - 1/4 acre Impervious Water* HSG: B *area at Total Weighted, Type Soil Nos.: TOB Basin... ,;. RCN"', 'Acreage *..* Open/ RCN: 79 61 61 98 100 Closed °BASIN S 1< 0.004 0.14 0.14 97: Open 0.26 0.04 0.30 82:_:: Open S 3< 0.11 0.20 Q:31 . , 91... Open 0.37 3.28 3.65 96 ,.:. Open 0.06 0.58 0.87 = 1.51. 83 :: Open 0.35 0.10 1.02 0.02 : 1 49 ::. 91.:: Open 0.08 0.31 1 0.39.::: 04::: Open 0'S;4 0.02 :: 0.02.: DRAINAGE TOTAL: • 1.23 0.68 5.88 0.02 7.81 91.78 Weighted RCN Open Space * * = r Represents area assigned due 1/2 credits for existing building structures to be demolished. * Drainage Total is the area included in the surface water management plan. This includes the 0.02 acres of offsite runoff that drains site from gas station. 1 0 Time of Concentration Calculations C n = xEfO "1 Kimley -Horn . And Associates,_ Inc. Unpaved Diameter in feet Project Information of en n G"ulat#Y Project Name: Wal -Mart Clearwater (Highland) WNM KHA Project #: 047253651 Designed by: NRL 12.14.2006 Revised by: Revised by: Tc FOR PRE- DEVELOPMENT BASIN S -1 i Manning's n -value n = xEfO "1 Unpaved Diameter in feet D =1;17Q Length in feet L = X142 00 .c<c ci e Slope s = 0 001U Length in feet L Slope s = OOd10 Length in feet L =0 OQ Precipitation (in /hr) P = r576 Slope s = Tt = 0.00. Manning's n -value n = 1rt000 Cross section area a = 0.79 Paved Wetted perimeter Pw = 3.14 Slope s = 00035 Hydraulic radius r = 0.25 Length in feet L = Tt = 0.09 Tt = 0.00 Tt = 0.00 The formulas utilized are as follows: Tc = L / 0.6; L = (Lh ^ 0.8) ' ((S + 1) ^ 0.7) / 1900 ' (s " 0.5); and S = (1000 / CN) - 10 HA047253 - Wal- Mart\651 - Clearwater (Highland)\ Documents \Design \Storm \Spreadsheets \CN -Tc Calcs.xls 5/18/2007 �=,M MM =7_1- -:and :Associates; inc: Project Information Project Narrle' Wal-Mart Clearwater (Highland) WNM KHA Project #: Designed by: NRL. 12.14.2006 Revised by: Revised by:,. Tc FOR PRE-DEVELOPMENT BASIN S-2 0 fl676615. MINE ,;,Lt , , � 'E,1112 AN, ZIA, � 011 KMBW40—oh ntrated TO Manning's n-value n Length in feet re number Unpaved @0 Diameter in feet, D �s�=q L= Slope 0169 Slope S= %7071 Length in feet Length in feet L= 0,66 S= I 000- M11 L- KK- (hr) Precipitation (in/hr P �.,76 Y L = % Slope S= Tt 0.00 E, Manning's n-value n = 1 0 ro ll 0 02 Cross section area a = 0.79 Paved Wetted' perimeter Pw = 3.14 Slope S= 0.003$ Hydraulic radius e= 0.25 -Length in feet @6 K",11@65 ,en %01 Tt = 0.061 1 Tt = 0.00 Tt = 0.00 a� TOTAL TIME OF CONCENTRATION i IN m n 1`0 The formulas utilized are as follows: Sheet flow Tt = (0.007 (n L) - 6.8) 1 ((P - 0.5) (s ^ 0.4)); Shallow concentrated flow paved Tt = L ((20.3282 (S A 0.5)) 3600); Shallow concentrated flow unpaved Tt = L / ((16.1345 * (S A 0.5)) * 3600); and Channel/Pipe fiow'Tt = (L' n) / ((1.49' (i A 0.667) (S A 0.5)) * 3600) TIME OF CONCENTRATION CALCULATED BY SCS CURVE NUMBER METHOD 'aulic length in feet Lh re number CN.= F-0 P ft/ft S = I 000- M11 (hr) L = #DlV/0! The formulas utilized areas follows: Tc = L/b.6: L=(Lh A 0.8)' ((S + 1) "0.7) / 1900' (i A 0.5); and S = (1000 / CN) - 10 H:\047253 - Wal-Mart\651 - Clearwater (Highland)\Documents\Design\Storm \Spreadsheets\CN-Tt Calcs.xIs 5/18/2007 _ _ M Time of loncen Faat`ion "a culatl Kimley' Horn : . and Associates; anc Project Information N Project Name: Wal -Mart Clearwater (Highland) WNM KHA Project ## 047253651 Designed by; NRL 12.14.2006 Revised by: Revised bye, Tc FOR PRE- DEVELOPMENT BASIN S -3 e lffli 1 OUR, O,�Q�OQ !000 0.79 3.14 0.25 �I Tt = 0.151 Tt = 0.001 Tt —:____0._00J1 TOTAL TIME OF CONCENTRATION Nu`8 82minutes. ' or °' xQ'fi` ` ,= n015 Hours'3 y The formulas utilized are as follows: Street flow Tt = (0.007' ( n L) ^ 0.8) / ((P ^ 0.5)'' (s ^ 0.j )); Shallow concentrated flow paved Tt = L / ((20.3282 ' (s ^ 0.5)) ' 3600j; shallow concentrated flow unpaved Tt = L /((18:1345 ' (s ^ 0.5)) • 3600); and Channe1lPipe flow Tt = (L' n) / ((1.49 ' (r ^ 0.667) ' (s ^ 0.5)) ' 3600) TIME OF CONCENTRATION CALCULATED BY SCS CURVE NUMBER METHOD 0 Hydraulic length in feet manning-s n -value n = 0083; Curve number Unpaved Diameter in feet' D = S__ 0 Ob+ Length in feet L= 18200: Slope = 01 L = #DIV /0! Slope s = 0 00`10` Length in feet L = s Precipitation Length in feet L = 0 00: (in /hr) P = 5, 6 ?1 Slope s = Tt = 0.00 Manning's n -value n= Cross section area a= Paved Wetted perimeter PW = Slope S= 0,:0035: Hydraulic radius r= Length in feet L = OaOQ e lffli 1 OUR, O,�Q�OQ !000 0.79 3.14 0.25 �I Tt = 0.151 Tt = 0.001 Tt —:____0._00J1 TOTAL TIME OF CONCENTRATION Nu`8 82minutes. ' or °' xQ'fi` ` ,= n015 Hours'3 y The formulas utilized are as follows: Street flow Tt = (0.007' ( n L) ^ 0.8) / ((P ^ 0.5)'' (s ^ 0.j )); Shallow concentrated flow paved Tt = L / ((20.3282 ' (s ^ 0.5)) ' 3600j; shallow concentrated flow unpaved Tt = L /((18:1345 ' (s ^ 0.5)) • 3600); and Channe1lPipe flow Tt = (L' n) / ((1.49 ' (r ^ 0.667) ' (s ^ 0.5)) ' 3600) TIME OF CONCENTRATION CALCULATED BY SCS CURVE NUMBER METHOD 0 Hydraulic length in feet Lh = '0M Curve number CN = _ 0.1 Slope ft/ft S__ 0 Ob+ Lag (hr) L = #DIV /0! The formulas utilized are as follows: Tc = L / 0.6; L = (Lh ^ 0.8) • ((S + 1) ^ 0.7) / 1900' (s ^ 0.5); and S = (1000 /'CN) - 10 H:\047253.- Wal- Mart\651 - Clearwater (Highland)\ Documents\ Design \Storm \Spreadsheets\CN -Tc Calcs.xls 5/18/2007 C M n Kimley -Morn and Associates, Inc. Project Information e ofIRRcen n CWMAW Project Name: Wal -Mart Clearwater (Highland) WNM KHA Project #: 047253651. Designed by: NRL 12.14.2006 Revised by: Revised by: Tc FOR PRE - DEVELOPMENT BASIN S -4 TOTAL TIME OF CONCENTRATION "9;$T minutes or 016 Hours The formulas utilized are as follows: Sheet flow Tt = (0.007' ( n ' L) 10.8) / ((P 10.5) (s " 0.4)); Shallow concentrated flow paved Tt = L / ((20.3282' (s ^ 0.5))' 3600); Shallow concentrated flow unpaved Tt = L / ((16.1345' (s " 0.5))' 3600); and Channel /Pipe flow Tt = (L' n) / ((1.49 ' (r 10.667) * (s ^ 0.5))' 3600) TIME OF CONCENTRATION CALCULATED BY SCS CURVE NUMBER METHOD Hydraulic length in feet Lh = 0 00 Curve number CN = Manning's n -value n X0015 Lag (hr) L = Unpaved IY0010 Diameter in feet feet D = L 2 00 0 00 Length in feet L 190 bb' Slope s = Length in _ = Slope s r � y0 001 Length in feet L Precipitation (in) P ,5:76 Slope s = 0'0050 Tt = 0.00 Manning's n -value n = K 0 01x2 Cross section area a = 3.14 Paved Wetted perimeter Pw = 6.28 Slope s = Q067 Hydraulic radius r = 0.50 Len thin feet L = 578Qp'. Tt = 0.671 Tt = 0.10 Tt = 0.00 TOTAL TIME OF CONCENTRATION "9;$T minutes or 016 Hours The formulas utilized are as follows: Sheet flow Tt = (0.007' ( n ' L) 10.8) / ((P 10.5) (s " 0.4)); Shallow concentrated flow paved Tt = L / ((20.3282' (s ^ 0.5))' 3600); Shallow concentrated flow unpaved Tt = L / ((16.1345' (s " 0.5))' 3600); and Channel /Pipe flow Tt = (L' n) / ((1.49 ' (r 10.667) * (s ^ 0.5))' 3600) TIME OF CONCENTRATION CALCULATED BY SCS CURVE NUMBER METHOD The formulas utilized areas follows: Tc = L/0.6; L = (Lh " 0.8) ' ((S + 1) " 0.7) / 1900' (S ^ 0.5); and S = (1000 / CN) • 10 H: \047253 - Wal- Mart \651 - Clearwater (Highland)\ Documents\ Design \Storm \Spreadsheets \CN -Tc Calcs.xls 5/18/2007 Hydraulic length in feet Lh = 0 00 Curve number CN = Slope Wilt s = RIO* Lag (hr) L = #DIV /0! The formulas utilized areas follows: Tc = L/0.6; L = (Lh " 0.8) ' ((S + 1) " 0.7) / 1900' (S ^ 0.5); and S = (1000 / CN) • 10 H: \047253 - Wal- Mart \651 - Clearwater (Highland)\ Documents\ Design \Storm \Spreadsheets \CN -Tc Calcs.xls 5/18/2007 "K &WcenWn (WIlatIFF Kid, Horn .and :A s`odates ii nc: Project Information Project Name: Wal-Mart Clearwater (Highland) WNM KHA Project #: 041253651 Designed by: NRL 12.14.2006 Revised by: k Revised by: Tc FOR PRE- DEVELOPMENT BASIN B -1 �; SlieetlFiow "" � 4.,. 3 a i" j�, Sr r3? ss• ..,` .:�j>,,'a�L�.. n . .e, - t{ k r...:�'�1�''.. :.; ,_ , 3 -� �(i'a �•• v' Shaliowa0 ncer•rt�atedaFiow -� .' tiC .� i' YrTM EWERS ... ri � ME 11- a n+..x ._, ,��tn ..�.r..R, .t�''3s;,R.a - d'`i'�c. Channelll'ipe" -., ;;a Manning's n -value n = 0 01''5 Curve number Slope Unpaved = 0;000 Diameter in feet in feet D = L = 2 00 0 0 Length in feet L = Slope 138 00 feet 5 0:00 Length for x s = Precipitation (In/hr) P = 0 0020 5c76: Length in :' l = . Slope s = M0050 Tt = 0.00 Manning's n -value n =0 Ott I Cross section area a = 3.14 1 Paved Wetted perimeter Pw = 6.28 Scope s = 04'5. Hydraulic radius r = 0.50 Length in feet L = MS.? 0 t 0 Tt = 0.06 I Tt = - . 0.11 _ . - Tt = 0.00 ....:..:<:. ... iivt c::.r.- . ...:y:.. :...:.i'i... TOTAL TIME OF CONCENTRATION ` r ) 1048' urinates,,,., orx ,;0 17,Hou "rs' The formulas utilized are as follows: Sheet flow Tt = (0.007' ( n ' L) ^ 0.8) / ((P ^ 0.5) (s ^ 0.4)); Shallow concentrated flow paved Tt = L I ((20.3282' (s ^ 0.5))' 3600); Shallow concentrated flow unpaved Tt = L / ((16.1345' (s'^ 0.5))' 3600); and Channel/Pipe flow Tt = (L' n) / ((1.49 ' (r ^ 0.667)' is 10.5)) * 3600) TIME OF CONCENTRATION CALCULATED BY SCS CURVE NUMBER METHOD I ;-,"r . " ,Flow " Hydraulic length in feet Lh Curve number CN Slope ft/ft s = 0 ?0000 Lag (hr) L = #DIV /0! x i The formulas utilized areas follows: Tc = L 10.6; L = (Lh ^ 0.8)' ((S + 1) ^ 0.7) / 1900' (s ^ 0.5); and S = (1000 / CN) -10 H: \047253 - Wal- Mart\651 - Clearwater (Highland)\ Documents\ Design \Storm.Spreadsheets \CN -Tc Calcs.xls I 5/18/2007 C Kimley =Horn ..._... antl Associates; lne Project Information Mof Men>An Mlatw Project Name: Wal -Mart Clearwater (Highland) WNM KHA Project #: 047253651 Designed by: NRL_ 12.14.2006 Revised by: Revised by: Tc FOR PRE - DEVELOPMENT BASIN B -2 5 4 motif' <� . p.vs �+ *r• .,::i, �..,.:,T „c:. F „a v b+s/ r,�u..._.._. fir_..::: , �,n,,,, '. 'gyp' ��a �1:::� tL �.i �� ?'., w5eq�' ..�. , � a.3. ..,, . ,3'. i. .,, �. �., ,:..:' ,.. ,,;f , ..ua.,'.uki„ i,....:3: ,rlr.3, �� L'. l $"�"i ,,. 5.2""rvk�.*hY Manning's n -value n =0 0 i5; 00 Unpaved Diameter in feet D = �1 OQ Length in feet L= 10b Slope s = b 001f7 Length in feet L= RQ4OQ Slope s� Length in feet L= F.�OOi Precipitation (in /hr) P Slope S= Tt = 0.00 Manning's n -value n= Cross section area a= 0.79 Paved Wetted perimeter Pw = 3.14 Slope s__ b 0020 Hydraulic radius r= 0.25 Length in feet L= 292.00 Tt = 0.061 Tt = 0.091 Tt = 0.00 TIME OF CONCENTRATION CALCULATED BY SCS CURVE NUMBER METHOD The formulas utilized are as follows: Tc = L / 0.6; L = (Lh ^ 0.8) • ((S + 1) ^ 0.7) / 1900' (S ^ 0.5); and S = (1000 / CN) - 10 H: \047253 - Wal- Mart\651 - Clearwater (Highland)\ Documents \Design \Storm \Spreadsheets \CN -Tc Calcs.xls 5/18/2007 M of RLen on Mlatwm Kimley -Horn C ,and Associates;: Inc: Project Information Project Name: Wal -Mart Clearwater (Highland) WNM KHA Project #: 047253651 Designed -by: NRL 12.14.2006 Revised by: Revised by: Tc FOR PRE- DEVELOPMENT BASIN B -3 �Pllollol� Hydraulic length in feet Lh Manning's n -value Length in feet n = pp 0 015 R 50 00 0 r k0 00 Slope Unpaved S= 0 00 €0 Diameter in feet Length in feet D L =0 4.00 00 Slope s =� ,{.5 fa�f . • �Or00 [b' Length in feet L= S „ 0 DO Precipitation (in /hr) -P= ,. :'- y F 576 Slope S= 1 8000 Tt = 0.00 Manning's n -value n= 1;000 Cross section area a= 0.79 Paved Wetted perimeter Pw = 3.14 Slope S= 003Q ON, 001 Hydraulic radius r= 0.25 Length in feet L= 0 Tt = 0.04 Tt = 0.001 Tt = 0.00 TOTAL TIME OF CONCENTRATION E Kl 2 minutes or. -- i14 Ho The formulas utilized are as follows: Sheet flow Tt = (0.007 ' ( 6 L) ^ 0.8) / ((P ^ 0.5) ' (s ^ 0.4)); Shallow concentrated flow paved Tt = L / ((20.3282 ' (s ^ 0.5)) ' 3600); Shallow concentrated flow unpaved Tt = L / ((16.1345 (s ^ 0.5))' 3600); and Channel /Pipe flow Tt = (L' n) / ((1.49' (r ^ 0.667)' (s ^ 0.5))' 3600) TIME OF CONCENTRATION CALCULATED BY SCS CURVE NUMBER METHOD The formulas utilized areas follows: Tc = L/ 0.6; L= (Lh ^ 0.8)' ((S + 1) ^ 0.7) / 1900 ' (s ^ 0.5); and S= (1000 / CN) - 10 H: \047253 - Wal- Mart\651 - Clearwater (Highland)\ Documents \Design \Storm \Spreadsheets \CN -Tc Calcs:xls 5/18/2007 Hydraulic length in feet Lh Curve number C = r k0 00 Slope ft/ft s = 0 0000 Lag (hr) L = #DIV /0! . ` ` " #bIV/61, , The formulas utilized areas follows: Tc = L/ 0.6; L= (Lh ^ 0.8)' ((S + 1) ^ 0.7) / 1900 ' (s ^ 0.5); and S= (1000 / CN) - 10 H: \047253 - Wal- Mart\651 - Clearwater (Highland)\ Documents \Design \Storm \Spreadsheets \CN -Tc Calcs:xls 5/18/2007 ilk Ili r, IIII� III. II. i r, I� il� ■� r, e ofMcen n ati JW Kimley -Horn M' PIand Associates; Inc. Project Information Project Name: Wal -Mart Clearwater (Highland) WNM KHA Project #: ' 047253651 Designed by: NRL 12.14.2006 Revised by: Revised by: Tc FOR PRE - DEVELOPMENT BASIN OS -1 .. _ y ., .~I E�t� Vlr':� r�a#.,'ir«?'r�'% �� ,ssn�s"��K�.... . . , .. . ?. �z � 07i4E-tr� ".: -8 � �' , ;� ^', �:`'c#180"+B�/Ri 8�F'li� �'"�.��.uc•.. •:•�:''. Manning's n -value n ;015; 4'Mo s = x00000 Unpaved L = Diameter in feet D = 2:00 Length in feet Slope L $290 Slope Length in feet s = L = b 0010 Length in feet MEMO L s ._„ w.0, Precipitation (in) P 576 Slope s = 0050 Tt = 0.00 Manning's n -value n = 13:0.1;2 Cross section area a = 3.14 Paved Wetted perimeter Pw = 6.28 Slope s = _ 0 0067,; Hydraulic radius r = 0.50 Length in feet L = k5 Otl'. Tt = 0.021 Tt = 0.10 Tt = 0.00 �y� . w��"g',,�xS"�SSa�zZ.x9�z..•fi"`. hv; '� x ". .�.A � i �� Hydraulic length in feet Lh = b 00 Curve number CN =<a 0 0 Slope ft/ft s = x00000 Lag (hr) L = #DIV /0! The formulas utilized areas follows: To = L/ 0.6; L = (Lh " 0.8)' ((S + 1) " 0.7) / 1g00' (s ^ 0.5); and S = (1000 / CN) -10 i H: \047253 - Wal- Mart\651 - Clearwater (Highland)\ Documents\ Design \Storm \Spreadsheets \CN -Te Calcs.xls 5/18/2007 t Pre - Development ICPR Input Data y ICPR Pre - Development 25yr -24hr Min /Max #4667 Clearwater (Highland) Max Time Max Warning Max Delta Max Surf Max Time Max Max Time Max Name Group Simulation Stage Stage Stage Stage Area Inflow Inflow Outflow Outflow hrs ft ft ft ft2 hrs cfs hrs cfs N Discharge BASE 25Y24HR 0.00 0.000 0.000 0.0000 0 12.00 2.019 0.00 0.000 NE Discharge BASE 2SY24HR 23.96 43.898 50.000 * * * * * * * ** 113 2.30 0.180 0.00 0.000 ROW Discharge W BASE 25Y24HR 0.00 0.000 0.000 0.0000 0 12.00 3.775 0.00 0.000 SE Discharge BASE 25Y24HR 0.00 0.000 0.000 0.0000 0 12.00 6.807 0.00 0.000 SW Discharge BASE 25Y24HR 0.00 0.000 0.000 0.0000 0 12.00 19.095 0.00 0.000 SWALE BASE 25Y24HR 24.00 43.890 40.000 0.0099 13528 12.00 7.545 2.30 0.180 Interconnected Channel and Pond Routing Model (ICPR) ©2002 Streamline Technologies, Inc. Page 1 of 1 I ICPR Pre - Development I Input Data 44667 Clearwater (Highland) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Basins---------------------------------------------------°------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Name: B -1 Node: SE Discharge Status: Onsite Group: BASE Type: SCS Unit Hydrograph Unit Hydrograph: Uh256 Peaking Factor: 256.0 Rainfall File: Storm Duration(hrs): 0.00 Rainfall Amount(in): 0.000 Time of Conc(min): 10.48 Area(ac): 1.510 Time Shift(hrs): 0.00 Curve Number: 83.00 Max Allowable Q(cfs): 999999.000 DCIA( %): 0.00 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Name: B -2 Node: SWALE Status: Onsite Group: BASE Type: SCS Unit Hydrograph Unit Hydrograph: Uh256 Peaking Factor: 256.0 Rainfall File: Storm Duration(hrs) : 0.00 Rainfall Amount(in): 0.000 Time of Conc(min): 10.00 Area(ac): 1.490 Time Shift(hrs): 0.00 Curve Number: 91.00 Max Allowable Q(cfs): 999999.000 DCIA( %): 0.00 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Name: B -3 Node: N Discharge Status: Onsite Group: BASE - Type: SCS Unit Hydrograph Unit Hydrograph: Uh256 Peaking Factor: 256.0 Rainfall File: Storm Duration(hrs): 0.00 Rainfall Amount(in): 0.000 Time of Conc(min): 10.00 Area(ac): 0.390 Time Shift(hrs): 0.00 Curve Number: 94.00 Max Allowable Q(cfs): 999999.000 DCIAM : 0.00 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Name: OS -1 Node: ROW Discharge W Status: Onsite Group: BASE Type: SCS Unit Hydrograph Unit Hydrograph: Uh256 Peaking Factor: 256.0 Rainfall File: Storm Duration(hrs) :- 0.00 - - -- - - - - - - - - -- -- - - -- - - - - -- -- Rainfall Amount(in): 0.000 Time of Conc(min): 10.00 Area(ac): 0.020 Time Shift(hrs): 0.00 - Curve Number: 98.00 Max Allowable Q(cfs): 999999.000 DCIA( %): 0.00 ------------------------------ Name: S -1 Group: BASE Unit Hydrograph: Uh256 Rainfall File: Rainfall Amount(in): 0.000 Area(ac): 0.140 Curve Number: 97.00 DCIAM : 0.00 ------------------------------- Name: S -2 Group: BASE Unit Hydrograph: Uh256 Rainfall File: Rainfall Amount(in): 0.000 Area(ac): 0.300 Curve Number: 82.00 DCIA( %): 0.00 Node: ROW Discharge W Status: Onsite Type: SCS Unit Hydrograph Peaking Factor: 256.0 Storm Duration(hrs): 0.00 Time of Conc(min): 10.00 Time Shift(hrs): 0.00 Max Allowable Q(cfs): 999999.000, ----------------------------- -------- --- --- ----- ------ --- - -- Node: ROW Discharge W Status: Onsite Type: SCS Unit Hydrograph Peaking Factor: 256.0 Storm Duration(hrs): 0.00 Time of Conc(min): 10.00 Time Shift(hrs): 0.00 Max Allowable Q(cfs): 999999.000 Interconnected Channel and Pond Routing Model (ICPR) 02002 Streamline Technologies, Inc. Page 1 of 4 t ICPR Pre - Development Input'Data 44667 Clearwater (Highland) Name: S -3 Node: ROW Discharge W Status: Onsite Group: BASE Type: SCS Unit Hydrograph Unit Hydrograph: Uh256 - Peaking Factor: 256.0 Rainfall File: Storm Duration(hrs): 0.00 Rainfall Amount(in): 0.000 Time of Conc(min): 10.00 Area(ac): 0.310 Time Shift(hrs): 0.00 Curve Number: 91.00 Max Allowable Q(cfs) : 999999.000 DCIAM : 0.00 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Name: S -4 Node: SW Discharge Status: Onsite Group: BASE Type: SCS Unit Hydrograph Unit Hydrograph: Ub256 Peaking Factor: 256.0 Rainfall File: Storm Duration(hrs): 0.00 Rainfall Amount(in): 0.000 Time of Conc(min): 10.00 Area(ac): 3.650 Time Shift(hrs): 0.00 Curve Number: 96.00 Max Allowable Q(cfs): 999999.000 DCIA M : 0.00 , Nodes ________________________________________________ ________ Name: N Discharge Base Flow(cfs): 0.006 Init Stage(ft): 0.000 Group: BASE Warn Stage(ft): 0.000 Type: Time /Stage - - - -- Time(hrs) Stage(ft) - - -- 0.00 0.000 100.00 0.000 --------- ------------------------ - - - --- ------ -- Name: NE Discharge Base Flow(cfs): 0.000 Init Stage(ft): 0.000 Group: BASE Warn Stage(ft): 50.000 Type: Stage /Area Stage(ft) Area(ac) ------- ---- -- -- ---- --- -- - - -- -- ------------------------ ------ ---- --- ---- --- - Name: ROW Discharge W Base Flow(cfs): 0.000 Init Stage(ft): 0.000 Group: BASE Warn Stage(ft): 0.000 Type: Time /Stage. --------------- Time(hrs) Stage(ft) - - - - -- 0.00 0.000 100.00 0.000 --------------------------------------------------------------------- Name: SE Discharge Base Flow(cfs): 0.000 Init Stage(ft): 0.000 Group: BASE Warn Stage(ft): 0.000 Type: Time /Stage , Time(hrs) Stage(ft) - -- --------- --- ----------=---- 0.00 0.000 100.00 0.000 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Name: SW Discharge Base Flow(cfs): 0.000 Init Stage(ft): 0.000 Group: BASE Warn Stage(ft): 0.000 Interconnected Channel and Pond Routing Model (ICPR) ©2002 'Streamline Technologies, Inc. Page 2 of 4 ICPR Pre - Development Input Data #4667 Clearwater (Highland) Type: Time /Stage Time(hrs) Stage(ft) -- ------ - --- -- -------- - -- --- 0.00 0.000 100.00 0.000 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Name: SWALE Base Flow(cfs): 0.000 Init Stage(ft): 38.600 Group: BASE Warn Stage(ft): 40.000 Type: Stage /Area. Stage(ft) Area(ac) 38.600 0.0196 40.000 0.0966 ------------------------------------------------------- ---- Operating Tables ---- -------------------------------------------------------------------- Name: 6" Pipe Group: BASE Type: Rating Curve Function: Head vs. Discharge - - - - - -- Head(ft) Discharge(cfs) 0.00 0.18 50.00 0.18 ----------------- ------------- - - - --- - ___= Rating Curves ----------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Name: Underdrain From Node: SWALE Count: 1 Group: BASE To Node: NE Discharge Flow: Both TABLE ELEV ON(ft) ELEV OFF(ft) #1: 6" Pipe 38.610 38.600 #2: 0.000 0.000 #3: 0.000 0.000 #4: 0.000 0.000 ------------------------ ------------------------- - - -- -- -- ___= Hydrology Simulations Name: 10OY24HR Filename: H: \047253 - -Wal- Mart \651 - Clearwater (Highland) \Documents \Design \Storm \ICPR \100Y24HR.R32 Override Defaults: Yes Storm Duration(hrs): 24.00 Rainfall File: Flmod Rainfall Amount(in): 12.96 Time(hrs) Print Inc(min) --------- - - - - -- --------------- 48.000 30.00 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Name:.25Y24HR Filename: H: \047253 - Wal- Mart \651 - Clearwater ( Highland) \Documents \Design \Storm \ICPR \2SY24HR.R32 Override Defaults: Yes Storm Duration(hrs): 24.00 Rainfall File: Flmod Rainfall Amount(in): 9.00 Time(hrs) Print Inc(min) ----------- - - -- --------------- 24.000 15.00 Interconnected Channel and Pond Routing Model (ICPR) 02002 Streamline Technologies, Inc. Page 3 of 4 ICPR Pre - Development Input Data #4667 Clearwater (Highland) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ___= Routing Simulations =_________.________________________ _______________________________ Name: 100Y24HR Hydrology Sim: 100Y24HR Filename: H: \047253 - WAL- MART \651 - CLEARWATER ( HIGHLAND) \DOCUMENTS \ DES IGN\STORM \ICPR \100Y24HR.I32 Execute: No Restart: No Patch: No Alternative: No Filename: H: \047253 - Wal- Mart \651 Max Delta Z(ft): 1.00 Delta Z Factor: 0.01000 Time Step Optimizer: 10.000 Start Time(hrs): 0.000 End Time(hrs): 48.00 Min Calc Time(sec): 0.2500 Max Calc Time(sec): 15.0000 Boundary Stages: Start Time(hrs): .Boundary Flows: Time(hrs)------ Print Inc(min) --- ------ ----------- Print Inc(min) 48.000 30.000 - ----- ------ - 15.000 Group Group Run BASE Yes BASE Yes ---------------------------------------------=------------------------------------------------------- Name: 25Y24HR Hydrology Sim: 2SY24HR Filename: H: \047253 - Wal- Mart \651 - Clearwater ( Highland)\ Documents \Design \Storm \ICPR \25Y24HR.I32 Execute: Yes Restart: No Patch: No Alternative: No Max Delta Z(ft): 1.00 Delta Z Factor: 0.01000 Time Step Optimizer: 10.000 Start Time(hrs): 0.000 End Time(hrs): 24.00 Min Calc Time(sec): 0.5000 Max Calo Time(sec): 15.0000 Boundary - Stages: Boundary Flows: Time(hrs) Print Inc(min) 24.000 - ----- ------ - 15.000 Group Run BASE Yes Boundary Conditions ------------------- ------------------- Interconnected Channel and Pond Routing Model (ICPR) ©2002 Streamline Technologies, Inc. Page 4 of 4 I ICPR Pre - Development Input Data #4667 Clearwater (Highland) Name: S -1 Basins ,Node: ROW Discharge W Status: Onsite Group: BASE Name: B -1 Node: SE Discharge Status: Onsite ' Group: BASE Rainfall File: Type: SCS Unit Hydrograph Storm Duration(hrs): 0.00 Unit Hydrograph: Uh256 Peaking Factor: 256.0 Area(ac): Rainfall File: Time Shift(hrs): Storm Duration(hrs): 0.00 97.00 Rainfall Amount(in): 0.000 Time of Conc(min): 10.48 Area(ac): 1.510 Time Shift(hrs): 0.00 Status: Onsite Curve Number: 83.00 Max Allowable Q(cfs): 999999.000 Unit Hydrograph: DCIA M : 0.00 256.0 Rainfall File: Name: B -2 0.00 Node: SWALE Status: Onsite Time of Conc(min): Group: BASE Area(ac): Type: SCS Unit Hydrograph Time Shift(hrs): 0.00 Unit Hydrograph: Uh256 Peaking Factor: 256.0 DCIAM : Rainfall File: Storm Duration(hrs): 0.00 Rainfall Amount(in): 0.000 Time of Conc(min): 10.00 Area(ac): 1.490 Time Shift(hrs): 0.00 Curve Number: 91.00 Max Allowable Q(cfs): 999999.000 DCIAM : 0.00 Name: B -3 Node: N Discharge Status: Onsite Group: BASE Type: SCS Unit Hydrograph ' Unit Hydrograph: Uh256 Peaking Factor: 256.0 Rainfall File: 'Storm Duration(hrs): 0.00 Rainfall Amount(in): 0.000 Time of Conc(min): 10.00 Area(ac): 0.390 Time Shift(hrs): 0.00 Curve Number: 94.00 Max Allowable Q(cfs): 999999.000 1 DCIA M : 0.00 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Name: OS -1 Node: ROW Discharge W Status: Onsite Group: SASE Type: SCS Unit Hydrograph Unit Hydrograph: Uh256 Peaking Factor: 256.0 Rainfall File: Storm Duration(hrs): 0.00 Rainfall Amount(in): 0.000 Time of Conc(min): 10.00 Area(ac): 0.020 Time Shift(hrs): 0.00 Curve Number: 98.00 Max Allowable Q(cfs): 999999.000 DCIA(%): 0.00 Name: S -1 ,Node: ROW Discharge W Status: Onsite Group: BASE Type: SCS Unit Hydrograph Unit Hydrograph: Uh256 Peaking - Factor: -256.0 Rainfall File: Storm Duration(hrs): 0.00 Rainfall Amount(in): 0.000 Time of Conc(min): 10.00 Area(ac): 0.140 Time Shift(hrs): 0.00 Curve Number: 97.00 Max Allowable Q(cfs): 999999.000 DCIA M : 0.00 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Name: S-2 Node: ROW Discharge W Status: Onsite Group: BASE Type: SCS Unit Hydrograph Unit Hydrograph: Uh256 Peaking Factor: 256.0 Rainfall File: Storm Duration(hrs): 0.00 Rainfall Amount(in): 0.000 Time of Conc(min): 10.00 Area(ac): 0.300 Time Shift(hrs): 0.00 Curve Number: 82.00 Max Allowable Q(cfs): 999999.000 DCIAM : 0.00 Interconnected Channel and Pond Routing Model (ICPR) ©2002 Streamline Technologies, Inc. Page 1 of 4 ICPR Pre-Development Input Data #4667 Clearwater (Highland) Name: S -3 ----------------------------------------------------------------- Node: ROW Discharge W Status: Onsite Group: BASE Type: SCS Unit Hydrograph Unit Hydrograph:.Uh2S6 Peaking Factor: 256.0 Rainfall File: Storm Duration(hrs): 0.00 Rainfall Amount(in): 0.000 Time of Conc(min): 10.00 Area(ac): 0.310 Time Shift(hrs): 0.00 Curve Number: 91.00 Max Allowable Q(cfs): 999999.000 DCIA(%): 0.00 !. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Name: S -4 Node: SW Discharge Status: Onsite Group: BASE Type: SCS Unit Hydrograph Unit Hydrograph: Uh2S6 Peaking Factor: 256.0 Rainfall File: Storm Duration(hrs): 0.00 Rainfall Amount(in): 0.000 Time of Conc(min): 10.00 Area(ac): 3.650 Time Shift(hrs): 0.00 Curve Number: 96.00 Max Allowable Q(cfs): 999999.000 DCIA(%): 0.00 ---------------------------------------------------- Nodes Name: N Discharge Base Flow(cfs): 0.000 Init Stage(ft): 0.000 Group: BASE Warn Stage(ft): 0.000 Type: Time /Stage ------ Time(hrs) Stage(ft) 0.00 0.000 100.00 0.000 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Name: NE Discharge Base Flow(cfs): 0.000 Init Stage(ft): 0.000 Group: BASE Warn Stage(ft): 50.000 Type: Stage /Area --------------- Stage(ft) Area(ac) ------- - Name: ROW Discharge W Base Flow(cfs): 0.000 Init Stage(ft): 0.000 Group: BASE - Warn Stage(ft): 0.000 Type: Time /Stage - - - -- Time(hrs) Stage(ft) - - - - -- 0.00 0.000 100.00' 0.000 -------------------------------------g------------------ Name: SE Discharge Base Flow(cfs): 0.000 Init Stage(ft): 0.000 Group: BASE Warn Stage(ft): 0.000 Type: Time /Stage i Time(hrs) Stage(ft) --------------- --------------- 0.00 0.000 100.00----------- 0.000- -- -- ----- ---------------------------------------------------------- Name: SW Discharge Base Flow(cfs): 0.000 Init Stage(ft): 0.000 Group: BASE Warn Stage(ft): 0.000 Interconnected Channel and Pond Routing Model (ICPR) ©2002 Streamline Technologies, Inc. Page 2 of 4 I ICPR Pre - Development Input Data #4667 Clearwater (Highland) Type: Time /Stage Interconnected Channel and Pond Routing Model (ICPR) 02002 Streamline Technologies, Inc. Page 3 of 4 Time(hrs) Stage(ft) ---- ----- --- - -- --------------- 0.00 0.000 �. 100.00 0.000 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Name: SWALE Base Flow(cfs): 0.000 Init Stage(ft): 38.600 Group: BASE Warn Stage(ft): 40.000 Type: Stage /Area Stage(ft) Area(ac) --- - - - - -- --------------- 38.600 0 40.000 0.0966 --------------------=-----=--------------------------------------------------------------- ___= Operating Tables Name: 6° Pipe Group: BASE Type: Rating Curve Function: Head vs. Discharge _ Head(ft) Discharge(cfs) i -- --- ---- - ----- --------------- 0.00 0.18 50.00 0.18 ----------------------------------------------------------------- ---- tang Curves ---- ----------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- -------- -Name: ------------------------- Unde rdrain From Node: SWALE Count: 1 Group: BASE To Node: NE Discharge Flow: Both TABLE ELEV ON(ft) -ELEV OFF(ft) ' #1: 6° Pipe 38.610 38.600 #2: 0.000 0.000 #3: 0.000 0.000 #4: 0.000 0.000 --------------------------------------------------- ________________________ ---- Hydrology Simulations ------ - - - - -- Name: 10OY24HR ----------------------------------------- Filename: H: \047253 - Wal- Mart \651 - Clearwater (Highland)\ Documents \Design \Storm \ICPR \100Y24HR.R32 Override Defaults: Yes Storm Duration(hrs): 24.00 Rainfall File- Flmod Rainfall Amount(in): 12.96 Time(hrs) Print Inc(min) ----- ---- - ----- --------------- 48.000 30.00 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Name: 25Y24HR Filename: H: \047253 - Wal- Mart \651 - Clearwater (Highland)\ Documents\ Design\ Storm\ ICPR\ 2 5Y2 4HR. R3 2 Override Defaults: Yes Storm Duration(hrs): 24.00 Rainfall File: Flmod Rainfall Amount (in)c9.00 Time(hrs) Print Inc(min) - - -- -- 24.000 15.00 Interconnected Channel and Pond Routing Model (ICPR) 02002 Streamline Technologies, Inc. Page 3 of 4 ICPR Pre - Development Input Data #4667 Clearwater (Highland) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ___= Routing Simulations ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ,Print Inc(min) ---------- Name: IOOY24HR Hydrology Sim: 100Y24HR Filename: H: \047253 - WAL- MART \6S1 - CLEARWATER ( HIGHLAND) \DOCUMENTS \DESIGN\STORM \ICPR \100Y24HR.I32 Execute: No Restart: No Patch: No Alternative: No Max Delta Z(fO : 1.00 Delta Z Factor: 0.01000 Time Step Optimizer: 10.000 Start Time(hrs): 0.000 End Time(hrs): 48.00 Min Calc Time(sec): 0.2500 Max Calc Time(sec): 15.0000 Boundary Stages: Boundary Flows: Time(hrs) I Print Inc(min) -- ------------- --------------- 48.000 30.000 Group Run --------- -- - - -- - - - -- ' BASE Yes Name: 25Y24HR Hydrology Sim: 25Y24HR Filename: H: \047253 - Wal- Mart \651 - Clearwater ( Highland)\ Documents \Design \Storm \ICPR \25Y24HR.I32 Execute: Yes Restart: No Patch: No Alternative: No ' Max Delta Z(ft): 1.00 Delta Z Factor: 0.01000 Time Step Optimizer: 10.000 Start Time(hrs): 0:000 End Time(hrs): 24.00 Min Calc Time(sec): 0.5000 Max Calc Time(sec): 15.0000 Boundary Stages: Boundary Flows: Time(hrs) ,Print Inc(min) --------------- 24.000 --------------- 15.000 Group Run --------- ------ BASE - -- -- Yes ----------------------------------------------------------- ------- --- ---- --- -- ------------ Boundary Conditions ------------------------------------------------------ Interconnected Channel and Pond Routing Model (ICPR) ©2002 Streamline Technologies, Inc. Page 4 of 4 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Section 3 Post- Development Calculations 1 11 � I 1 L Post - Development Calculations Wal *Mart Store 94667 -00, Clearwater (Highland), Florida, Highland and Greenlea NARRATIVE KHA developed a stormwater management plan to meet both the water quantity and water quality conditions of the SWFWMD and City of Clearwater based upon the requirements for a redevelopment. The stormwater management plan consists of a stormwater vault and two treatment ponds. Per conversations with City of Clearwater staff, the stormwater vault is allowed for attenuation purposes only and there are no freeboard requirements for the pond. Treatment is achieved through the use of underdrains in each pond. Each of the ponds and underdrains will be lined per FDOT and City of Clearwater specs. To quickly convey water above the treatment elevation each pond is also equipped with a horizontal weir control structure. The two ponds send treated water to the vault where it discharges to the inlet at the western access on Greenlea Drive which is connected to the city system in the Greenlea Drive right of way. This plan provides water quality treatment for one -half inch (1/2 ") over the entire site and attenuation for the 25 year -24 hour storm while still drawing down in 24 hours. The underdrains are designed according to City of Clearwater and FDOT specifications and the associated underdrain filter media is designed to FDOT spec 902 -4 "Filter Media for Underdrains." Rainfall design intensity has been determined using SWFWMD figure D -5 "25 year -24 hour Return Period Rainfall Map" from the Environmental Resource Permit manual. As can be seen below, and in the attached calculations, post- development discharge for the 25 year, 24 hour storm event from the site and contributing off -site area does not exceed the pre- development discharge and the ponds drawdown within the required 24 hours; see the Results section of the Post Development Calculations narrative. Based on the Geotechnical Report (Appendix A.8) the current soil profile for the site appears to consist of a fine sand layer to depths ranging from 6 to 18 feet. Clay and indurated clay followed the sandy layer to an approximate depth of 26 feet. Borings that penetrated to that depth then showed a limestone layer beneath the clay. _ RESULTS POND STAGE ELEVATIONS Pond No. Bottom of Pond (Ft.) Top of Bank (Ft. ) Treatment Elevation (Ft.) 25 year DHWL Pond A 35.50 39.00 36.80 37.61 Pond B 33.70 38.00 36.93 37.32 r PEAK DISCHARGE RATE (cfs) Node Name Basin Area 25 year 24 hour Event City System 7.35 acres 16.38 cfs ROW Discharge 0.47 acres 2.24 cfs Total Post - Development Peak Discharge from Wal -Mart parcel 7.84 acres 18.62 cfs COMPARISON Node Name Basin Area (Pre) Basin Area (Post) Peak Discharge (Pre) Peak Discharge (Post) City System 3.65 acres 7.33 acres 19.10 cfs 16.38 cfs Unchanged ROW Discharge 0.47 acres 0.47 acres 2.24 cfs 2.24 cfs Other Discharge Points 3.69 acres - 10.55 cfs - Total Site Comparison 7.81 acres 7.82 acres 31.89 cfs 18.62 cfs Based on the following calculations, the 25 year -24 :hour post - development discharge from the ' stormwater vault is 16.38 cfs; and discharge offsite by areas to remain undisturbed account for another 2.24 cfs. The total of 18.62 cfs is significantly lower than the predevelopment peak discharge of 31.91 cfs. i 1 The pages included in this section are as follows: • Post - Development Basin Map , • Post - Development Node Diagram • Curve Number Calculations • Pond Stage = Storage Calculations • Pond Underdrain Calculations • Buoyancy Calculations • Post- Development ICPR input Data ' • Post- Development ICPR Node Results (10 year, 24 hour and 25 year, 24 hour) • Post- Development ICPR Time Series Results (25 year, 24 hour) • Storm Tabs • Profile of Hydraulic Grade Line r Post - Development Basin Map H: \047253 - Wal- Mart\651- Clearwater (Highland) \CADD \Exhibit \POST DRAINAGE MAP.dwg, POST DEV, 5/18/200710:39:02 AM, ,hawing name: m: \wrzoo - waI- Marc\oot - uearwater (n15 fii. aeaxn•nt. laths with tn. ---t. and e..1— .--d N.r.In. a. an 0 c 3 m 4) ■ WIWI D w 1; ti fr�(9rsl----- 1 _ J I t 1 A i I III III i� •� I.1 I!j I I l;l I! if I I 'frl I d I I. I pj 1 ail -Ills IIi III I I Im z II 1 ■ ICI I 1); I t `li I it lei I PoI I i III - �I —.... .._° -?li I Ertl � iEki I I li 6 SCALE AS NOTED <i II I )lt'\I`VW VNAIINAGL MAV.CWg ru3l UtV May Ia, zuuf Iu: 3Sam Dy. eueen.come 1. Int.nd.d -1, far t,. p..Ift purpaw and dimt for Wh It .a....par.d. R.u.. of and F V-p.r NI— an thi. d—nt .i—ut rj --------------------------- �;0F ----------- -- ---- ___ ASPHALT ROADWAY ...... . - ---- _ ..................... - ------ - -- `r-r�c.w._...........;-. R-- r. ..... � ......__... L�' r Y__ .............. ....._ ........... ..........�:-- Ip ease as 4X m Y. as as as 1 kax _........I I _. _.._ .............. _ —� : ................ D 1 W i 0 n e z ci 0 1 �I D 1 ♦ ' L_ 1 ♦�r�ta �I I I � ��.__� a # Ulm as a __ a a as g . b > as as as asaa x y as L as a ` {� as 1 lye��C all g 4y pig AEa g g� 9 aa 5 y { 4 pi 11 S rh n y ¢ ull L 44444 „'::r as J J a ___ . I�:':..� as as \� - as as s.., 5 A as as y �� I ■ � '� i9 g S pp 1 6 a Ia $ - ■.i � � a� � , I �a xY I a sa ss as Ye■ , � as I GJi ale1 k� aa I yy hIF It ng D. IS N I H S FuaoN �l1 S T x a o WAL -MART - CLEARWATER (HIGHLAND) SCALE AS NOTED DESIGN ENGINEER: Kimsey Hom — _ 0 0 . N as STORE #4667 -00, WNM ¢ POST- DEVELOPMENT DESIGNED BY RWEA REGSRATIXI NUMBER: ❑_❑ — and Associates, Inc. ¢ *1 —' ;�� Loo '� N. HIGHLAND AVE AND GREENLEA DR. DRAINAGE MAP DRANK BY NRL © 2007 KIMLEY —HORN AND ASSOCIA7ES, INC. 10117 Princ... Pdm Sulte 300, Tampa, FL 33610 m Awna., _..Y... .,r._.... .:.:: Fir t� �� -�- -s ■stets a� la ■9� _ CIIECI(m er DW14 t.ua= = I g �] FS ELa i a' y ■ BY IFS pS E' s a s r : tHI -s ° ua: or I i s.x,: sr:;:..rrs;nu ' via t (' it ■ I' ' I ! N ' � 1 � I ' i I ......... ... ..... ..... .... � I �� Ct � # I LILL I � - y I �� I LOr jz S S � I I i q V C i a ♦ � .0 its, r E rxar Hera I H S FuaoN �l1 S T x o 9 o WAL -MART - CLEARWATER (HIGHLAND) SCALE AS NOTED DESIGN ENGINEER: Kimsey Hom — _ 0 0 . N oD STORE #4667 -00, WNM POST- DEVELOPMENT DESIGNED BY RWEA REGSRATIXI NUMBER: ❑_❑ — and Associates, Inc. —' ;�� Loo '� N. HIGHLAND AVE AND GREENLEA DR. DRAINAGE MAP DRANK BY NRL © 2007 KIMLEY —HORN AND ASSOCIA7ES, INC. 10117 Princ... Pdm Sulte 300, Tampa, FL 33610 m Awna., z CITY OF CLEAR WATER FLORIDA CIIECI(m er DW14 SEAL PN.n.: (6u) 820 -1460 F.. (813) 620 -1542 WWW.KIMLEY- HORN.CGM CA 00000696 No REVISIONS DATE BY Post- Development Node Diagram ICPR Post Development 10yr -24hr Node Min /Max 44667 Clearwater (Hiah Nodes A Stage /Area V Stage /Volume T Time /Stage M Manhole Basins 0 Overland Flow U SCS Unit Hydro S Santa Barbara Links P Pipe W Weir C Channel D Drop Structure B Bridge R Rating Curve H Breach T:ROW DISCHARGE U: B -2 U: S -1 R:UNDERDRAIN A D:CS -A A:POND A .................... ... :................ i U:T -2 U:B -1 A:STR 2 -4 U: R -1 U: R -2 U: R -3 P: PIPE 3 A: JUNCTION A: POND B D:CS -B R:UNDERDRAIN B U:S -3 U:S -5 ......... ..............................: U: S-4 U:P -1 U:P -4 U: P -2 U: P -3 U:P -5 U: S -2 Interconnected Channel and Pond Routing Model (ICPR) 02002 Streamline Technologies, Inc. Curve Number Calculations M M M = = M = = � = = M = = - = = M C = F Kimley -Horn and Associates, Inc. Pre vs. Post Runoff Analysis Composite Curve Number (CN) Project Information Project Name: Wal -Mart Clearwater (Highland) Store #4667 -00 KHA Project #: 047253651 Designed by: NRL 5/14/2007 Revised by: Revised by: POST - DEVELOPMENT R 7 R2 0.20 0.20. Open Land Use: Urban Land 61 Open Space Good Conditions Residential -1/4 acre Impervious Water* Basin HSG: O e RUNON OFFSITE TOTAL: 0.54 B 1 0.54 area at Total :•: Weighted; Type Soil Nos.: TOB Basin. Acreage * -' Open/ RCN: 79 61 61 98 100 Closed 8,1 0.08 1.12 1.20 Open $ 2 0.08 0.31 0.39 - 94 . • Open 2 0.14 0.95 0.16 1.25.:: 94 .:. Open 0.11 1.68 j,7gr 96.:. : ; Open P 2, 0.04 0.79 0.83.. 96 :: Open P 3:° 0.03 0.77 _ 0:80:: 97::: Open 0.02 0.20 0.22 :_ 95::: Open P 3 0.05 0.25 _ 0.30 :_ :_ 92, :: Open P =6 0.01 0.06 O:07: Open S 1; 0.08 0.08 ::: :81:.... S=2e 0.06 0.01 0.11 0.18 ;87. Open S 3: 0.01 0.08 0.09:::: ;94' " : Open 0.26 0.04 0:30::: 66_ :: ; Open S-5'Y 0.24 0.00 0.10 Q;34.. 8:5::::: Open ONSITE DRAINAGE TOTAL: * 0.32 0.89 6.36 1 0.27 7.84 1 92.28 R 7 R2 0.20 0.20. Open 0.18 61 Open 0.16 0.1,6.: . .61 O e RUNON OFFSITE TOTAL: 0.54 1 0.54 1 61.00 Weighted RCN = (Pervious Are_a)x(Pervious RCN) +(Impervious Area)x(Impervious RCN) Total Basin Acreage *' Due to proposed grading the site no longer includes offsite run -off that previously was included. This accoutns for the change in total basin area from the predevelopment analysis. Pond Stage- Storage Calculations Stage /Storage Calculations Project Name: Project No.: Stage /Storage Calculations Project Name: Project No.: �*csn, Mare ft 1r� s I'NI area _acres Ume c Volume. ac -ft' ac f ,: 1 10 ;c =t< Bottom33 7D ' , „,.,, , �1N5$ -dfl x,,. 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Increment n ' #x3400 ;< r 3, 1800.31 0.04 513.96 513.96 0.01 0.01 Increment ';45. 1980.67 0.05 472.62 986:58 0.01 0.02 Increment 2161.02 0.05 517.71 1504.29 0.01 0.03 r4fl Increment x�34 75 ;:� 2341.38 0.05 562.80 2067.09 0.01 0.05 Increment 5 50 2882.45 0.07 1958.93 4026.03 0.04 0.09 Increment3trOQ,,, 3243.16 0.07. 1531.40 5557.43 0.04 0.13 CWE 3 93y,, `.�.<' 3914.08 0.09 3328.11 8885.54 0.08 0.20 _ DHWE��;3, 32 4195.43 0.10 1581.35 10466.90 0.04 0.24 • TOB3800,,, ,,, ,',, 5' 4686`.UO 0.11 3019.69 13486.58 0.07 0.31 Pond Underdrain Calculations Underdrain Drawdown Analysis Pond A Project Name: rd-OL E- "A-R- ,�W!R ATE, 2" Project No.: Center line of underdrain (ft NGVD) Top of treatment volume/weir elevation (ft NGVD) Pond bottom (ft NGVD) Diameter of underdrain (ft) Length of underdrain (ft) Width of underdrain filter bed Filter material "K" value (ft/hr) Volume between pond bottom and top of treatment volume/weir elevation (cf) Area at top of treatment volume (sf) Area at pond bottom (sf) Depth of filter media (ft) Vis on Date 07/1 b /03 Underdrain Drawdown Analysis Pond B - Line I Project Name: Project No.: Water -'le v I i gg gm 501 x,T M "ge - �' ME, M NIMMONS DIU 5 1 i nue VIII, � M n, OTA RX, 17 Rp g rg IS, U." IS ftaN151, 104 M�i IN, 1% RZ 0 "Off Avera "E"I'Malm "I, Al"Iti �LvV7 -- - -------- C 6fil a r f.cr OM I WN"11 hrs 7�� ro , ge Firs $" , r7 tot g- 36.93 5.73 3821.00 0.00 2.87 635.00 9824.09 0.00 0.00 -6tv, 0.00 36.71 5.51 3461.04 359.96 2.76 635.00 9454.90 9639.49 0.04 0.04 36.50 5.30 3120.23 340.81 2.65 635.00 9085.71 9270.30 0.04 0.07 36.28 5.08 2793.82 326.41 1 2.54 635.00 8716.52 8901.11 0.04 0.11 36.07 4.87 2481.81 312.01 2.43 635.00 8347.33 8531.92 0.04 0.15 35.85 4.65 2184.20 297.61 2.33 635.00 .7978.14. 8162.173 0.04 0.18 35.64 4.44 1900.98 283.21 1 2.22 635.00 7608.95 7793.55 0.04 0.22 35.42 4.22 1632.17 .268.81 1 2.11 635.00 7239.76 7424.36 0.04 0.26 35.21 4.01 1377.75 254.42 1 2.00 635.00 6870.57 7055.17 0.04 0.29 34.991 3.79 1137.74 240.02. 1 1,901 635.00 6501.38 6685.98 0.04 0.33 34.78 3.58 912.12 225.62 1 1.79 6132.20 6316.79 0.04 0.36 34.56 3.36 700.90 211.22 1 1.68 635.00 - 5763.01 �5947.60 -0.04 0.40 34.35 34.13 3.15 2.93 504.07 321.65 196.82 182A2 1 1 � 1 .57 1.47, 635.00 635.00 5393.82 5024.63 5578.41 5209.22 "0.04 0.04 0.43 0.47 33.92, .[------33.701 2.72 2.50 153.63 O.nnI 168.021 153.63[ 1 1- 1.36 1.25, 635.001 635.001- 4655.441 4286.251 .4840.031 4470.841 0.03 0.031 0.50 0.54 Center line of underdrain (ft NGVD) Too of treatment volum6/weir elevation (ft NGVD) Pond bottom (ft NGVD) Diameter•of underdrain (ft) Length of underdrain (ft) Width of underdrain filter bed Filter material "K" value (ft/hr) Volume between pond bottom and top of treatment volume/weir elevation (cf) Area at top of treatment volume (sf) Area at pond bottom (sf) Depth of filter media (ft) .............. :R J t Project Name: Project No.: Underdrain Drawdown Analysis Pond B - Line 2 VIS, _d ya _ n, MR, MINE I a, 6 gp- MIR W, FAFIR-Iffilviffil, 10, Q WRIM IM '174 I WI- ZA reraciRM' M C V I E., �i RWFIR MIAMI 36.93 5.73 5064.00 0.00 2.87 838.20 12967.79 0.00 0.00 0.00 36.71 5.51 4587.32 476.68 2.76 838.20 12480.46 12724.13 0.04 0.04 36:50 5.30 4135.55 451.77; 2.65 -838.20 11993.13 12236.80 0.04 0.07 36.28 5.08 3702.87 432.68 .2.54 838.20 11505.80 11749.47 0.04 0.11 36.07 4.87 3289.29 413.58 2.43 838.20 .11018.47 11262.14 0.04 0.15 35.85 4.65 2894.80 394.49 2.33 838.20, 10531.14 10774.81 0.04 0.18 35.64 4.44 2519.40 375.40, 2.22 838.20 10043.82 10287.48 0.04 0.22 35.42 4.22 2163.10 2.11 .838.20 9556.49. 9800.15 0.04 0.26 35.21 4.01 1825.88 337.21 t 2.00 838.20 9069.16 9312.82 0.04 0.29 34.99 3.79 1507.76 318.12 1 .1.90 838.20 8581.83 8825.49 0.04 0.33 34.78 3.58 1208.74 299.03 1 1.79 838.20. 8094.50 8338.16 0.04 0.37 34.56 3.36 928.80 279.93 f 1.68 838.20 7607.17 .7850.83 0.04 0.40 34.35 3.15 667.96 260.84 j 1.57 838.20 7119.84 7363.50 0.04 0.44 34.13 2.93 426.22 241.75 1 1.47 -838.20 6632.51 6876.17, 0.04 0.47 33.921 2.721 203.561 222.651 1.361L - 838.201 6145.181 6388.841 0.03 0.51 2.501 0.001 203.561- 1 1.251 838.201. 5657.851 5904.511 0.03, L-J-54 i Center line of underdrain (ft NGVD) Top of treatment volume/weir elevation (ft NGVD) Pond bottom (ft NGVD) Diameter of underdrain (ft) Length of underdrain (ft) Width of underdrain filter b4d Filter material "K" value (ft/hr) Volume between pond bottom and top of treatment volume/weir elevation (cf) Area at top of treatment volume (sf) Area at pond bottom (sf) Depth of filter media (ft) .......... w ...... ............ ... : ..... ll.i.l.:z..,....',.....-,!-,,-,��,-.,.,:.�,��,, . .................. ... Revision' Date: .... ... .. .... ... . Infiltration Rate of Underdrain Pond A Actual Infiltration Capacity of Infiltration Stage Rate (cfs) Pipe* (cfs) Rate 36.80 3.53 1.13 1.13 36.71 3.45 1.13 1.13 36.63 3.37 1.13 1.13 36.54 3.29 1.13 1.13 36.45 3.21 1.13 1.13 36.37 3.13 1.13 1.13 36.28 3.05 1.13 1.13 36.19 2.97 1.13 1.13 36.11 2.89 1.13 1.13, 36.02 2.81 1.13 1.13 35.93 2.73 1.13 1..13, 35.85 2.65 1.13 1.13. 35.76 2.57 1.13 1.13 35.67 2.49 1.13 1.13 35.59 2.41 1.13 1.13 35.50 2.33 1.13 1.13 Pipe Radius: 0.5 ft Pond B Infiltration Infiltration Stage Rate 1 Infiltration Capacity of Rate of (ft) (cfs) Rate 2 (cfs) each pipe" (cfs) Pond B 36.93 2.73 3.60 1.13 2.26 36.71 2.63 3.47 1.13 2.26 36.50 2.52 3.33 1.13 2.26 36.28 2.42 3.20 1.13 2.26 36.07 2.32 3.06 1.13 2.26 35.85 2.22 2.93 1.13 2.26 35.64 2.11 2.79 1.13 2.26 35.42 2.01 2.65 1.13 2.26 35.21 1.91 2.52 1.13 2.26 34.99 1.81 2.38 1.13 2.26 34.78 1.70 2.25 1.13 2.26 34.56 1.60 2.11 1.13 2.26 34.35 1.50 1.98 1.13 2.26 34.13 1.40 1.84 1.13 2.26 33.92 1.29 1.71 1.13 2.26 33.70 1.19 1.57 1.13 2.26 Pipe Radius: 0.5 ft *Based on Manning's equation assuming full flow with a bottom slope of .001 and an n value of .013 Pond Buoyancy Calculations Kimley -Horn and Associates, Inc �, . Sheet No. --L of Job M �{p as i.' ' L(ad Subject � ( "� (We !C Job No. Q 4171 3 GS Designed by Af 4 g y� Date 0-3130 �'�� Checked by- 1tL,/� P Date � 0 0 fi c � tkk 't. F 1� h �y a ❑ � ❑ Kimley -Horn and Associates, Inc. Sheet No. 1 of Jobs �✓'' �!f 4 ubject &1 -cu t'i�S Job No. d,7ZS36S T- Designed by /u12- Date Checked by At o Dale 3 % ❑ � � Kimley -Horn and Associates, Inc. Sheet No. / of f Job�m C/PcLru -rzfe-, Subject shor ^'(-oG-�-Cr" t �� 4-'Lr JobNoOq7a E2 (pS i Designed by Date 4-7 Checked by tiA-P Date .5119Z07- Imo¢ 0- I 0 - - -�-- �Ca- � -- : S v )J —, U r I� � �-)(� --4 _� .3 � I L3.- C�- { • —�--� 1 i-X, .l_.3.0 �l_. -� � � iC� i! , !O a7�_�1 IDA, T__r 7-11 i _ _ I _ p 3._3 3)( / 5'O I o�.f �-_'- I- I— } i T I I s'�, (� i _ _... , _... -� i ill _ , 1 i - -- I =i- a -'- —a4 � ' _ i - - -- - -1 -- L.� -- J- Imo¢ 0- Post - Development ICPR Input Data ICPR Post Development Input Data 44667 Clearwater (Highland) Page 1 of 8 -------------------- ------------ - - -- Basins ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ---- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Node: ROW DISCHARGE Status: Onsite ' Name: B -1 Node: POND A Status: Onsite ' Group: BASE Uh256 Type: SCS Unit Hydrograph 256.0 Unit Hydrograph: Uh256 Peaking Factor: 256.0 Rainfall File: 0.000 Storm Duration(hrs): 0.00 Rainfall Amount(in): 0.000 Time of Conc(min): 10.00 Area(ac): 1.200 Time Shift(hrs): 0.00 Curve Number: 96.00 Max Allowable Q(cfs): 999999.000 DCIA( %): 0.00 Node: POND B Status: Onsite Page 1 of 8 -------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------ Name: B -2 Node: ROW DISCHARGE Status: Onsite Group: BASE Type: SCS Unit Hydrograph ' Unit Hydrograph: Uh256 Peaking Factor: 256.0 Rainfall File: Storm Duration(hrs): 0.00 Rainfall Amount(in): 0.000 Time of Conc(min): 10.00 Area(ac): 0.390 Time Shift(hrs). 0.00 Curve Number: DCIA(96)i 94.00 0.00 Max Allowable Q(cfs): 999999.000 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Name: P -1 Node: POND B Status: Onsite ' Group: BASE Type: SCS Unit Hydrograph Unit'Hydrograph: Uh256 Peaking Factor: 256.0 Rainfall File: Storm Duration(hrs): 0.00 Rainfall Amount(in): 0.000 Time of Conc(min): 10.00 Area(ac): 1.790 Time Shift(hrs): 0.00 Curve Number: 96.00 Max Allowable Q(cfs): 999999.000 DCIAM : 0.00 -----------------------=-------------------------------------------------------------------------- Name: P -2 Node•.POND B Status: Onsite Group: BASE Type: SCS Unit Hydrograph Unit Hydrograph: Uh2S6 Peaking Factor': 256.0 Rainfall File: Storm Duration(hrs): 0.00 Rainfall Amount(in): 0.000 Time of Conc(min): 10.00 Area(ac): 0.830 Time Shift(hrs): 0.00 Curve Number: 96.00 Max Allowable Q(cfs): 999999.000 DCIA M : 0.00 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Name: P -3 Node: POND B Status: Onsite - ' Group: BASE Type: SCS Unit Hydrograph Unit Hydrograph: Uh256 Peaking Factor: 256.0 Rainfall File: Storm Duration(hrs): 0.00 , Rainfall Amount(in): 0.000 Time of Conc(min): 10.00 Area(ac): 0.800 Time Shift(hrs): 0.00 Curve Number: .97.00 Max Allowable Q(cfs): 999999.000 DCIAM : 0.00 ---------------`---------------------------------- ---- ----- --------- ------ - ----- `------------------ Name• P -4 Nod POND B Status• Onsite Group: BASE 'Type: SCS Unit Hydrograph , Unit Hydrograph: Uh256 Peaking Factor: 256.0 ' Rainfall File: Storm Duration(hrs): 0.00 Rainfall Amount(in): 0.000 Time of Conc(min): 10.00 Area(ac): 0.220 Time Shift(hrs): 0.00 Curve Number: 95.00 Max Allowable Q(cfs): 999,999.000 DCIA(%): 0.00 interconnected Channel and Pond Routing Model (ICPR) 02002 Streamline Technologies, Inc. Page 1 of 8 ICPR Post Development ' Input Data #4667 Clearwater (Highland) Page 2 of 8 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------- Name:-P-6-1 ame• P -6 Node: CITY SYSTEM Status: Onsite ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Name: P -5 Node: POND B Status: Onsite ' Group: BASE Uh256 Type: SCS Unit Hydrograph 256.0 ' Unit Hydrograph. Uh256 Peaking Factor: 256.0.; - Rainfall File: 0.000 Storm Duration(hrs): 0.00 Rainfall Amount(in): 0.000 Time of Conc(min): 10.00 Area(ac): 0.300 Time Shift(hrs): 0.00 ' Curve Number: 92.00 Max Allowable Q(cfs): 999999.000 DCIA( %): 0.00 Node: STR 2 -4 Status: Onsite Page 2 of 8 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------- Name:-P-6-1 ame• P -6 Node: CITY SYSTEM Status: Onsite Group: BASE Type: SCS Unit Hydrograph Unit Hydrograph: Uh256 Peaking Factor: 256.0 ' Rainfall File: Storm Duration(hrs): 0.00 Rainfall Amount(in): 0.000 Time of Conc(min): 10.00 Area(ac): 0.070 Time Shift(hrs): 0.00 Curve Number: 93.00 Max Allowable Q(cfs): 999999.000 ' DCIA M : 0.00 ------------------------------------------------`--------------------------------------------------- Name: R -1 Node: STR 2 -4 Status: Onsite Group: BASE Type: SCS Unit Hydrograph Unit Hydrograph: Uh256 Peaking Factor: 256.0 - Rainfall File: Storm Duration(hrs): 0.00 Rainfall Amount(in): 0.000 Time of Conc(min): 10.00 Area(ac): 0.200 Time Shift(hrs): 0.00 Curve Number: 61.00 Max Allowable Q(cfs): 999999.000 DCIAM : 0.00 1 -----------------------------------------------------------------------------(=---------------------- Name: R -2 Node: STR 2 -4 Status: Onsite Group: BASE Type: SCS Unit Hydrograph Unit Hydrograph: Uh256 Peaking Factor: 256.0 Rainfall File: Storm Duration(hrs): 0.00 ' Rainfall Amount(in): 0.000 Time of Conc(min): 10.00 Area(ac): 0.180 Time Shift(hrs): 0.00 Curve Number: 61.00 Max Allowable Q(cfs): 999999.000 DCIAM : 0.00 Name: R -3 Node: STR 2 -4 Status: Onsite Group: BASE Type: SCS Unit Hydrograph ' Unit Hydrograph: Uh256 Peaking Factor: 256.0 Rainfall File: Storm Duration(hrs): 0.00 Rainfall Amount(in): 0.000 Time of Conc(min): 10.00 Area(ac): 0.160 Time Shift(hrs): 0.00 Curve Number: 61.00 Max Allowable Q(cfs): 999999.000 ' DCIAM : 0.00 -----------------------------------------------S- Name: S -1 ---------------------------------------------------- Node: ROW DISCHARGE Status: Onsite Group: BASE Type: CS Unit Hydrograph Unit Hydrograph: Uh256 Peaking Factor: 256.0 Rainfall File: Storm Duration(hrs): 0.00 Rainfall Amount(in): 0.000 Time of Conc(min): 10.00 Area(ac): 0.080 Time Shift(hrs): 0.00 Curve Number. 61.00 Max Allowable Q(cfs): 999999.000 DCIAM : 0.00 Interconnected Channel and Pond Routing Model (ICPR) 02002 Streamline Technologies, Inc. Page 2 of 8 ICPR Post Development Input Data #4667 Clearwater (Highland) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------'--------------- Name: S -2 Node: POND B Status: Onsite Group: BASE Type: SCS Unit Hydrograph Unit Hydrograph: Ub256 Peaking Factor: 256.0 - Rainfall File: Storm Duration(hrs): 0.00 Rainfall Amount(in): 0.000 Time of Conc(min): 10.00 Area(ac): 0.180 Time Shift(hrs): 0.00 Curve Number: 87.00 Max Allowable Q(cfs): 999999.000 DCIA M : 0.00 i Name: S -3 Node: POND B -- ---- --- - --- Status: Onsite Group: BASE Type: SCS Unit Hydrograph Unit Hydrograph: Uh256 Peaking Factor: 256.0 Rainfall File: Storm Duration(hrs): 0.00 Rainfall Amount(in): 0.000 Time of Conc(min): 10.00 Area(ac): 0.090 Time Shift(hrs): 0.00 Curve Number: 94.00 Max Allowable Q(cfs): 999999.000 DCIA M : 0.00 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Name: S -4 Node: POND B Status: Onsite Group: BASE Type: SCS Unit Hydrograph Unit Hydrograph: Uh256 Peaking Factor: 256.0 Rainfall File: Storm Duration(hrs): 0.00 Rainfall Amount(in): 0.000 Time of Conc(min): 10.00 Area(ac): 0.300 Time Shift(hrs): 0.00 Curve Number: 66.00 Max Allowable Q(cfs): 999999.000 DCIAM : 0.00 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Name: S -5 Node: POND B Status: Onsite Group: BASE Type: SCS Unit Hydrograph Unit Hydrograph: Uh256 Peaking Factor: 256.0 Rainfall File: _Storm Duration(hrs): 0.00 Rainfall Amount(in): 0.000 Time of Conc(min) : 10.00 Area(ac): 0.340 Time Shift(hrs). 0.00 Curve Number: 85.00 Max •Allowable Q(cfs): 999999.000 DCIA( %): 0.00 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Name: T -2 Node: POND A Status: Onsite Group: BASE Type: SCS Unit Hydrograph Unit Hydrograph: Uh256 Peaking Factor- 256.0 Rainfall File: Storm Duration(hrs): 0.00 Rainfall Amount(in): 0.000 Time of Conc(min): 10.00 Area(ac): 1.250 Time Shift(hrs): 0.00 Curve Number: 96.00 Max Allowable Q(cfs): 999999.000 DCIAM : 0.00 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ =__= Nodes Name: CITY SYSTEM Base Flow(cfs): 0.000 Init Stage(ft): 30.380 Group: BASE Warn Stage(ft): 30.390 Type: Time /Stage Time(hrs) Stage(ft) Interconnected Channel and Pond Routing Model (ICPR) ©2002 Streamline Technologies, Inc. Page 3 of 8 ICPR Post Development Input Data #4667 Clearwater (Highland) 0.00 30.380 24.00 30.380 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Name: JUNCTION Base Flow(cfs): 0.000 Init Stage(ft): 30.670 Group: BASE Warn Stage(ft): 39.300 Type: Stage /Area i - - - -- Stage(ft) - Area(ac) 30.670 0.0008 39.930 0.0008 --------- ----- -------- ------------------ - Name: POND A Base Flow(cfs): 0.000 Init Stage(ft): 35.500 Group: BASE Warn Stage(ft): 39.000 Type: Stage /Area . Stage(ft) Area(ac) ----- ---- ------ --------------- 35.500 0.0700 36.500 0.0900 37.500 0.1200 38.500 0.1500 39.000 0.1600 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Name: POND B Base Flow(cfs): 0.000 Init Stage(ft): 33.700 Group: BASE Warn Stage(ft): 38.000 Type: Stage /Area --------------- Stage(ft) Area(ac) - - - - -- 33.700 0.0400 36.000 0.0700 37.000 0.0900 38.000 0.1100 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Name: ROW DISCHARGE Base Flow(cfs): 0.000 Init Stage(ft): 0.000 Group: BASE Warn Stage(ft): 0.000 Type: Time /Stage - Time(hrs) Stage(ft) 0.00 0.000 100.00 0.000 ------------- ----- --- ------ --------- - -- - -- --- Name: STR 2 -4 Base Flow(cfs): 0.000 Init Stage(ft): 31.230 Group: BASE Warn Stage(ft): 39.820 Type: Stage /Area , --------------- Stage(ft) Area(ac) ------ 31.230 0.0008 39.820 0.0008 ------- ---- ---- ------ -- -- ---- --- - - - - -- - Name: VAULT Base Flow(cfs) : 0.000 Init Stage(ft): 30.250 Group: BASE Warn Stage(ft): 35.080 Type: Stage /Area Stage(ft) Area(ac) - ---- ---- - --- -- -- ------- - - - - -- 30.500 0.2900 35.000 0.2900 Interconnected Channel and Pond Routing Model (ICPR) 02002 Streamline Technologies, Inc. a Page 4 of 8 r. I ICPR Post Development Input Data #4667 Clearwater (Highland) -------------------------------------- --- ---- - - - - -- -- - ___= Operating Tables -----------°------------------------------- -------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------ Name: UNDERDRAIN A Group: BASE Type: Rating Curve Function: Head vs. Discharge Head(ft) Discharge(cfs) - - - - -- 35.00 1.13 40.00 1.13 Name: UNDERDRAIN B Group: BASE Type: Rating Curve Function: Head vs. Discharge Head(ft) Discharge(cfs) - -------------- --------------- 33.00 2.26 38.00 2.26 ---- Pipes ------------------------------------------`--------- ---- ---------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ PIPE 2 From Node: JUNCTION --- ---_____________________ 128.00 Name: PIPE 1 From Node: VAULT Length(ft): 70.00 Group: BASE To Node: CITY SYSTEM Count: 1 - UPSTREAM DOWNSTREAM Friction Equation: Average Conveyance Geometry: UPSTREAM DOWNSTREAM Solution Algorithm: Automatic Geometry: Circular Circular Flow: Both Span(in): 18.00 18.00 Entrance Loss Coef: 0.20 Rise(in): 18.00 18.00 Exit Loss Coef: 1.00 Invert(ft): 30.500 30.380 Bend Loss Coef: 0.00 Manning's N: 0.013000 0.013000 Outlet Ctrl Spec: Use do or tw Top Clip(in): 0.000 0.000 Inlet Ctrl Spec: Use do Hot Clip(in): 0.000 0.000 Stabilizer Option: None ' Upstream FHWA Inlet Edge Description: Circular Concrete: Square edge w/ headwall Downstream FHWA Inlet Edge Description: Circular Concrete: Square edge w/ headwall 0 ------------------------------------------------------------=---------------------------------- Name: PIPE 2 From Node: JUNCTION Length(ft): 128.00 Group: BASE To Node: VAULT Count: 1 Friction Equation: Average Conveyance UPSTREAM DOWNSTREAM Solution Algorithm: Automatic Geometry: Circular Circular Flow: Both Span(in): 36.00 36.00 Entrance Loss Coef: 0.00 Rise(in): 36.00 36.00 Exit Loss Coef: 0.00 Invert(ft): 30.630 30.500 -Bend Loss Coef: 0.00 Manning's N: 0.013000 0.013000 Outlet Ctrl Spec: Use do or tw Top Clip(in): 0.000 0.000 Inlet Ctrl Spec: Use do Hot Clip(in): 0.000 0.000 Stabilizer Option: None Upstream FHWA Inlet Edge Description: Circular Concrete: Square edge w/ headwall Downstream FHWA Inlet Edge Description: Circular Concrete: Square edge w/ headwall ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ' Name: PIPE 3 From Node: STR 2 -4 Length(ft): 192.00 Interconnected Channel and Pond Routing Model (ICPR) 02002 Streamline Technologies, Inc. Page 5 of 8 ' ICPR Post Development Input Data #4667 Clearwater (Highland) ' Group: BASE From Node: POND A Length(ft): 391.00 UPSTREAM BASE Geometry: Circular Count: Span(in): 24.00 ' Rise(in): 24.00 Average Conveyance Invert(ft): 31.230 Circular Manning's N: 0.013'000 Automatic Top Clip(in): 0.000 ' Bot Clip(in): 0.000 To Node: JUNCTION DOWNSTREAM Circular 24.00 24.00 30.630 0.013000 0.000 0.000 Upstream FHWA Inlet Edge Description: ' Circular Concrete: Square edge w/ headwall Downstream FHWA Inlet Edge Description: Circular Concrete: Square edge w/ headwall U-1 .1 U U C Drop Structures Count: 1 Friction Equation: Average Conveyance Solution Algorithm: Automatic Flow: Both Entrance Loss Coef: 0.00 Exit Loss Coef: 0.00 Bend Loss Coef: 0.00 Outlet Ctrl Spec: Use do or tw Inlet Ctrl Spec: Use do Stabilizer Option: None Name: CS -1 From Node: POND A Length(ft): 391.00 Group: BASE To Node: STR 2 -4 Count: 1 UPSTREAM DOWNSTREAM Friction Equation: Average Conveyance Geometry: Circular Circular Solution Algorithm: Automatic Span(in): 18.00 18.00 Flow: Both Rise(in): 18.00 18.00 Entrance Loss Coef: 0.000 Invert(ft): 32.500 31.230 Exit Loss Coef: 0.000 Manning's N: 0.013000 0.013000 Outlet Ctrl Spec: Use do or tw Top Clip(in): 0.000 0.000 Inlet Ctrl Spec: Use do Bot Clip(in): 0.000 0.000 Solution Incs: 10 Upstream FHWA Inlet Edge Description: Circular Concrete: Square edge w/ headwall Downstream FHWA Inlet Edge Description: Circular Concrete: Square edge w/ headwall * ** Weir 1 of 1 for Drop Structure CS -1 * ** TABLE Count: 1 Bottom Clip(in): 0.000 Type: Horizontal 'Top Clip'(in): 0.000 Flow: Both Weir Disc Coef: 3.200 - Geometry: Rectangular Orifice Disc Coef: 0.600 Span(in): 54.00 Invert(ft): 36.800 Rise(in): 36.00 Control Elev(ft): 36.800 ------------------------------------------------------ Name: CS -2 From Node: POND,B Group: BASE To Node: JUNCTION UPSTREAM DOWNSTREAM Geometry: Circular Circular Span(in): 36.00 36.00 Rise(in): 36.00 36.00 Invert(ft): 30.670 30.630 Manning's N: 0.013000 0.013000 Top Clip(in): 0.000 0.000 Bot Clip(in): 0.000 0.000 Upstream FHWA Inlet Edge Description: Circular Concrete: Square edge w/ headwall Downstream FHWA Inlet Edge Description: Circular Concrete: Square edge w/ headwall — Weir 1 of 1 for Drop Structure CS -2 * ** ---------------------------------------- Length(ft): 30.00 Count: 1 Friction Equation: Average Conveyance Solution Algorithm: Automatic Flow: Both Entrance'Loss Coef: 0.000 Exit Loss Coef: 0.000 Outlet Ctrl Spec: Use do or tw Inlet Ctrl Spec: Use do Solution Incs: 10 TABLE Interconnected Channel and Pond Routing Model (ICPR) 02002 Streamline Technologies, Inc. Page 6 of 8 ICPR Post Development Input Data #4667 Clearwater (Highland) Count: 1 Type: Horizontal Flow: Both Geometry: Rectangular Span(in): 84.00 Rise(in): 84.00 ------------------ ------------------ ___= Rating Curves Bottom Clip(in): 0.000 Top Clip(in): 0.000 Weir Disc Coef: 3.200 Orifice Disc Coef: 0.600 Invert(ft): 36.930 Control Elev(ft): 36.930 Name: From Node: Count: 1 Group: BASE To Node: Flow: Both TABLE ELEV ON(ft) ELEV OFF(ft) - #1: 0.000 0.000 #2: 0.000 0.000 #3: 0.000 0.000 #4: 0.000 0.000 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Name: UNDERDRAIN A From Node: POND A Count: 1 ' Group: BASE To Node: STR 2 -4 Flow: Both TABLE ELEV ON(ft) ELEV OFF(ft) #1: UNDERDRAIN A 35.510 35.500 #2: 0.000 0.000 #3: - 0.000 0.000 #4: 0.000 0.000 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Name: UNDERDRAIN B From Node: POND B Count: 1 Group: BASE To Node: JUNCTION Flow: Both TABLE ELEV ON(ft) ELEV OFF(ft) #1: UNDERDRAIN B 33.710 33.700 #2: 0.000 0.000 #3: 0.000 0.000 #4: 0.000 0.000 Hydrology Simulations ' Name: 10YR24HR Filename: H: \047253 - WAL -MART \651 - CLEARWATER ( HIGHLAND)\ DOCUMENTS \DESIGN\STORM \ICPR \IOYR24HR.R32 Override Defaults: Yes Storm Duration(hrs): 24.00 ' Rainfall File: Flmod Rainfall Amount(in): 7.50 Time(hrs) Print Inc(min) --------------- --------------- ' 24.000 15.00 ---- - - - -- Name: 2SYR24HR Filename: H: \047253 - Wal- Mart \651 - Clearwater (Highland)\ Documents \Design \Storm \ICPR \25Y24HR.R32 Override Defaults: Yes Storm Duration(hrs): 24.00 Rainfall File: Flmod Rainfall Amount(in): 9.00 ' Time(hrs) Print Inc(min) 24.000 15.00 IRouting Simulations N Interconnected Channel and Pond Routing Model (ICPR) ©2002 Streamline Technologies, Inc. Pa_ ge 7 of 8 ICPR Post Development Input Data #4667 Clearwater (Highland) 15 J Name: 10YR24HR Hydrology Sim: 10YR24HR Filename: H: \047253 - WAL- MART \651 - CLEARWATER (HIGHL AND) \DOCUMENTS \DESIGN \STORM \ICPR \10YR24HR.I32 Execute: Yes Restart: No Patch: No Alternative: No Max Delta Z(ft): 1.00 Delta Z Factor: 0.01000 Time Step Optimizer: 10.000 Start Time(hrs):' 0.000 End Time(hrs): 24.00 .Min Calc Time(sec): 0.2500 Max Calc Time(sec): 15.0000 Boundary Stages: Boundary Flows: Time(hrs) - - -- Print Inc(min) Print Inc(min) ------------ 24.000 - - 24.000 15.000 Group - ---- ---------- Run ----- BASE Group Run -- ------ - - - ---- -- - -- BASE Yes - ---- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Name: 25YR24HR Hydrology Sim: 25YR24HR Filename: H: \047253 - WAL -MART \651 - CLEARWATER (HIGHLAND) \DOCUMENTS \DESIGN \STORM \ICPR \25YR24HR.I32 Execute: Yes Restart: No Patch: No Alternative: No Max Delta Z(ft): 1.00 Delta Z Factor: 0.01000 Time Step Optimizer: 10.000 Start Time(hrs): 0.000 End Time(hrs): 24.00 Min Calc Time(sec): 0.2500 Max Calc Time(sec): 15.0000 Boundary Stages: Boundary Flows: Time(hrs) Print Inc(min) ------------ 24.000 - -- --------------- 15.000 Group - ---- ---------- Run ----- BASE Yes - - - �- Boundary Conditions ------------------------ ------------------------ Interconnected Channel and Pond Routing Model (ICPR) 02002 Streamline Technologies, Inc. Page 8 of 8 0 Post .Development ICPR Node Min/Max Results I ICPR Post Development 10yr -24hr Node Min /Max #4667 Clearwater (Highland) Name Group Simulation Max Time Stage hrs Max Stage ft Warning Stage ft Max Delta Stage ft Max Surf Area ft2 Max Time Inflow hrs Max Inflow efs Max Time Outflow hrs Max Outflow cfe CITY SYSTEM BASE 10YR24HR 0.00 30.380 30.390 0.0000 3 12.55 13.855 0.00 0.000 JUNCTION BASE IOYR24HR 12.48 34.287 39.300 - 0.0100 132 12.02 30.895 12.02 30.874 POND A BASE IOYR24HR 12.06 37.137 39.000 0:0047 4753 12.00 10.644 12.04 9.995 POND B BASE 10YR24HR 12.02 37.268 38.000 0.0100 4154 12.00 20.197 12.02 19.892 ROW DISCHARGE BASE IOYR24HR 0.00 0.000 0.000 0.0000 0 12.00 1.829 0.00 0.000 STR 2 -4 BASE IOYR24HR 12.37 34.535 39.820 0.0099 123 12.03 11.042 12.03 11.024 VAULT BASE IOYR24HR 12.56 34.157 35.080 - 0.2500 12651 12.02 30.874 12.56 13.734 4 4 t Interconnected Channel and Pond Routing Model (ICPR) ©2002 Streamline Technologies, Inc. Page 1 of 1 ICPR Post Development 25yr -24hr Node Min /Max 44667 Clearwater (Highland) Max Time Max Warning Max Delta Max Surf Max Time Max Max Time Max Name Group Simulation Stage Stage Stage Stage Area Inflow Inflow Outflow Outflow hrs ft ft ft ft2 hrs Cfs hrs Cfs CITY SYSTEM BASE 25YR24HR 0.00 30.380 30.390 0.0000 3 12.64 16.383 0.00 0.000 JUNCTION BASE 25YR24HR 12.59 35.220 39.300 0.0100 132 12.01 35.426 12.01 35.114 POND A BASE 25YR24HR 12.33 37.608 39.000 - 0.0067 5369 12.00 12.822 11.97 9.989 POND B BASE 25YR24HR 12.01 37.321 38.000 0.0100 4200 12.00 24.522 12.01 24.171 ROW DISCHARGE BASE 25YR24HR 0.00 0.000 0.000 0.0000 0 - 12.00 2.243 0.00 0.000 STR 2 -4 BASE 25YR24HR 12.51 35.601 39.820 0.0100 123 12.00 11.454 11.99 11.276 VAULT BASE 25YR24HR 12.66 35.044 35.080 - 0.2500 12650 12.01 35.114 12.66 16.265 t Interconnected Channel and Pond Routing Model (ICPR) ©2002 Streamline Technologies, Inc. Page 1 of 1 Post - Development ICPR Node Time Series Results ICPR Post Development 25yr -24hr Node Time Series #4667 Clearwater (Highland) Simulation Node Group Time hrs Stage ft Warning Stage ft Surface Area ft2 Total Inflow cfs Total Outflow cfs Total Total Vol In Vol Out of of 25YR24HR POND A BASE 0.00 35.500 39.000 3049 0.000 0.000 0.0 0.0 25YR24HR POND A BASE 0.25 35.500 39.000 3049 0.000 0.000 0.0 0.0 25YR24HR POND A BASE 0.50 35.500 39.000 3049 0.000 0.000 0.0 0.0 2SYR24HR POND A BASE 0.75 35.500 39.000 3049 0.000 0.000 0.0 0.0 25YR24HR POND A BASE 1.00 35.501 39.000 3050 0.008 0.000 0.0 0.0 25YR24HR POND A BASE 1.25 35.507 39.000 3055 0.032 0.000 0.0 0.0 25YR24HR POND A BASE 1.50 35.500 39.000 3049 0.060 0.000 0.0 0.0 25YR24HR POND A BASE 1.75 35.500 39.000 3049 0.086 0.000 0.0 0.0 25YR24HR POND A BASE 2.00 35.500 39.000 3049 0.108 0.000 0.0 0.0 25YR24HR POND A BASE 2.25 35.500 39.000 3049 0.132 0.000 0.0 0.0 25YR24HR POND A BASE 2.50 35.500 39.000 3049 0.152 0.000 0.0 0.0 25YR24HR POND A BASE 2.75 35.500 39.000 3049 0.168 0.000 0.0 0.0 25YR24HR POND A BASE 3.00 35.500 39.000 3049 0.182 0.000 0.0 0.0 25YR24HR POND A BASE 3.25 135.500 39.000 3049 0.204 0.000 0.0 0.0 25YR24HR POND A BASE 3.50 35.500 39.000 3049 0.219 0.000 0.0 0.0 25YR24HR POND A BASE 3.75 35.500 39.000 3049 0.231 0.000 0.0 0.0 25YR24HR POND A BASE 4.00 35.500 39.000 3049 0.241 0.000. 0.0 0.0 25YR24HR POND A BASE 4.25 35.500 39.000 3049 0.268 0.000 0.0 0.0 25YR24HR POND A BASE 4.50 35.500 39.000 3049 0.284 0.000 0.0 0.0 25YR24HR POND A BASE 4.75 35.500 39.000 3049 0.295 0.000 0.1 0.0 25YR24HR POND A BASE 5.00 35.SOO 39.000 3049 0.302 0.000 0.1 0.0 2SYR24HR POND A BASE 5.25 35.500 39.000 3049 0.319 0.000 0.1 0.0 25YR24HR POND A BASE 5.50 35.500 39.000 3049 0.329 0.000 0.1 0.0 25YR24HR POND A BASE 5.75 35.500 39.000 3049 0.337 0.000 0.1 0.0 25YR24HR POND A BASE 6.00 35.500 39.000 3049 0.342 0.000 0.1 0.0 25YR24HR POND A BASE 6.25 35.500 39.000 3049 0.381 0.000 0.1 0.0 2SYR24HR POND A BASE 6.50 35.500 39.000 3049 0.400 0.000 0.1 0.0 25YR24HR POND A BASE 6.75 35.500 39.000 3049 0.411 0.000 0.1 0.0 25YR24HR POND A BASE 7.00 35.500 39.000 3049 0.416 0.000 0.1 0.0 25YR24HR POND A BASE 7.25 35.500 39.000 3049 0.457 0.000 0.1 0.0 25YR24HR POND A BASE 7.50 35.500 39.000 3049 0.476 0.000 0.1 0.0 25YR24HR POND A BASE 7.75 35.500 39.000 3049 0.487 0.000 0.1 0.0 25YR24HR POND A BASE 8.00 35.500 39.000 3049 0.492 0.000 0.2 0.0 25YR24HR POND A BASE 8.25 35.500 39.000 3049 0.544 0.000 0.2 0.0 25YR24HR POND A BASE 8.50 35.500 39.000 3049 0.569 1.130 0.2 0.0 25YR24HR POND A BASE 8.75 35.500 39.000 3049 0.631 0.000 0.2 0.0 25YR24HR POND A BASE 9.00 35.500 39.000 3050 0.659 1.130 0.2 0.0 25YR24HR POND A BASE 9.25 35.500 39.000 3049 0.696 1.130 0.2 0.1 2SYR24HR POND A BASE 9.50 35.500 39.000 3049 0.714 1.130 0.2 0.1 25YR24HR POND A BASE 9.75 35.500 39.000 3050 0.797 1.130 0.2 0.1 25YR24HR POND A BASE 10.00 35.500 39.000 3050 0.835 1.130 0.3 0.1 25YR24HR POND A BASE 10.25 35.500 39.000 3049 0.980 1.130 0.3 0.2 2SYR24HR POND A BASE 10.50 35.500 39.000 3050 1.045. 1.130 0.3 0.2 2SYR24HR POND A BASE 10.75 35.511 39.000 3059 1.252 1.130 0.3 0.2 25YR24HR POND A BASE 11.00 35.560 39.000 3101 1.342 1.130 (7�4 i O 1 ` 0.2 r ` 25YR24HR POND A BASE 11.25 35.634 39.000 3166 1.438 1.13 t` ��+ 0.2 25YR24HR POND A BASE 11.50 35.840 39.000 3346. 2.320 30 0.4 '3^,� 25YR24HR POND A BASE 11.75 36.679 39.000 4155 6.859 1.130 /y �� ot {d 25YR24HR POND A BASE 12.00 37.239 39.0Z43481.286 12.8 9.946 - 0.4 25YR24HR POND A BASE 12.25 '37.582 39.0 9 7 8.581 1.0 9,6 25YR24HR POND A BASE 12.50 37.484 39.0 .739 7.882 ( M g 25YR24HR POND A BASE 12.75 36.973 39.09 3.138 4.585 .2 0.9 25YR24HR POND A BASE 13.00 36.879 39.01.922 2.204 1.3 1.0 25YR24HR POND A BASE 13.25 36.844 39.00 1.430 1.579 1.3 1.0 25YR24HR POND A BASE 13.50 36.827 39.08 1.286 1.347 1.3 1.0 25YR24HR POND A BASE 13.75 36.811 39.07 1.089 1.185 1.3 1.1 25YR24HR POND A BASE 14.00 36.792 39.01 1.012 1.130 1.4 1.1 25YR24HR POND A BASE 14.25 36.755 39:0 4 0.903 1.130 1.4 1.1 25YR24HR POND A BASE 14.50 36.702 39. 4 0.860 1.130 1.4 1.1 25YR24HR POND A BASE 14.75 36.633 3 .000 4095 0.766 1.130 1.4 1.2 2SYR24HR POND A BASE 15.00 36.548 .000 3983 0.728 1.130 1.4 1.2 25YR24HR POND A BASE 15.25 36.451 39.000 3878 0.686 1.130 1.4 1.2 25YR24HR POND A BASE 15.50 36.345 39.000 3785 0.671 1.130 1.5 1.2 25YR24HR POND A BASE 15.75 36.227 39.000 3683 0.613 1.130 1.5 1.2 25YR24HR POND A BASE 16.00 36.09 39.000 3568 0.588 1.130 1.5 1.3 25YR24HR POND A BASE 16.25 35.9 2 39.000 3443 0.552 1.130 1.5 1.3 25YR24HR POND A BASE 16.50 35' 9 39.000 3307 0.538 1.130 1.5 1.3 25YR24HR POND A BASE j§_7_5 35. 7 39.000 3160 0.507 1.130 1.5 1.3 25YR24HR POND A BASE 7.00j .500 39.000 3049 0.494 0.000 1.5 1.4 25YR24HR POND A BASE 00 39.000 3049 0.489 0.000 1.5 1.4 25YR24HR POND A BASE 17.50 35.500 39.000 3049 0.487 0.000 1.6 1.4 25YR24HR POND A BASE 17.75 35.500 39.000 3049 0.435 0.000 1.6 1.4 25YR24HR POND A BASE 18.00 35.500 39.000 3049 0.412 0.000 1.6 1.4 25YR24HR POND A BASE 18.25 35.500 39.000 3049 0.428 0.000 1.6 1.4 25YR24HR POND A BASE 18.50 35.500 39.000 3049 0.437 0.000 1.6 1.4 25YR24HR POND A BASE 18.75 35.500 39.000 3049 0.389 0.000 1.6 1.4 25YR24HR POND A BASE 19.00 35.500 39.000 3049 0.367 0.000 1.6 1.4 Interconnected Channel and Pond Routing Model (ICPR) 02002 Streamline Technologies, Inc. Pagel of 3 ' ICPR Post Development 25yr -24hr Node Time Series #4667 Clearwater (Highland) Simulation Node Group Time hrs Stage ft Warning Stage ft Surface Area ft2 Total Inflow cfs Total Outflow cfs Total Vol In of Total Vol Out of 25YR24HR POND A BASE 19.25 35.500 39.000 3049 0.384 0.000 1.6 1.4 25YR24HR POND A BASE 19.50 35.500 39.000 3049 0.393 0.000 1.6 1.4 25YR24HR POND A BASE 19.75 35.500 39.000 3049 0.371 0.000 1.6 1.4 ' 25YR24HR POND A BASE 20.00 35.500 39.000 3049 0.361 0.000 1.6 1.4 2SYR24HR POND A BASE 20.25 35.500 39.000 3049 0.329 0.000 1.6 1.4 25YR24HR POND A BASE 20.50 35.500 39.000 3049 0.317 0.000 1.6 1.4 25YR24HR POND A BASE 20.75 35.500 39.000 3049 0.312 0.000 1.7 1.4 25YR24HR POND A BASE 21.00 35.500 39.000 3049 0.311 0.000 1.7 1.4 25YR24HR POND A BASE 21.25 35.500 39.000 3049 .0.311 0.000 1.7 1.4 25YR24HR POND A BASE 21.50 35.500 39.000 3049 0.311 0.000 1.7 1.4 25YR24HR POND A BASE 21.75 35.500 39.000 3049 0.310 0.000 1.7 1.4 25YR24HR POND A BASE 22.00 35.500 39.000 3049 0.310 0.000 1.7 1.4 25YR24HR POND A BASE 22.25 35.500 39.000 3049 0.311 0.000 1.7 1.4 25YR24HR POND A BASE 22.50 35.500 39.000 3049 0.310 0.000 1.7 1.4 ' 25YR24HR POND A BASE 22.75 35.500 .39.000 3049 0.284 0.000 1.7 1.4 25YR24HR POND A BASE 23.00 35.500 39..000 3049 0.273 0.000 1.7 1.4 25YR24HR POND A BASE 23.25 35.500 39.000 3049 0.267 0.000 1.7 1.4 2SYR24HR POND A BASE 23.50 35.500 39.000 3049 0.266 0.000 1.7 1.4 25YR24HR POND A BASE 23.75 35.500 39.000 3049 0.239 0.000 1.7 1.4 ' 25YR24HR POND A BASE 24.00 35.500 39.000 3049 0.000 0.000 1.7 1.4 2SYR24HR POND A BASE 24.00 35.500 39.000 3049 0.000 0.000 1.7 1.4 25YR24HR POND B BASE 0.00 33.700 38.000 1742 0.000 0.000 0.0 0.0 25YR24HR POND B BASE 0.25 33.700 38.000 1742 0.000 0.000 0.0 0.0 25YR24HR POND B BASE 0.50 33.700 38.000 1742 0.000 0.000 0.0 0.0 25YR24HR POND B BASE 0.75 33.700 38.000 1743. 0.002 0.000 0.0 0.0 25YR24HR POND B BASE 1.00 33.706 38.000 1746 0.019 0.000 0.0 0.0 25YR24HR POND B BASE 1.25 33.700 38.000 1742 0.057 0.000 0.0 0.0 25YR24HR POND B BASE 1.50 33.700 38.000 1742 0.099 0.000 0.0 0.0 25YR24HR POND B BASE 1.75 33.700 38.000 1742 0.139 0.000 0.0 0.0 25YR24HR POND.B BASE 2.00 33.700 38.000 1742 0.174 0.000 0.0 0.0 2SYR24HR POND B BASE 2.25 33.700 38.000 1742 0.213 0.000 0.0 0.0 25YR24HR POND B BASE 2.50 33.700 38.000 1742 0.245 0.000 0.0 0.0 25YR24HR POND B BASE 2.75 33.700 38.000 1742 0.271 0.000 0.0 0.0 2SYR24HR POND B BASE 3.00 33.700 38.000 1742 0.293 0.000 0.0 0.0 25YR24HR POND B BASE 3.25 33.700 38.000 1742 0.330 0.000 0.0 0.0 25YR24HR POND B BASE 3.50 33.700 38.000 1742 0.358 0.000 0.0 0.0 25YR24HR POND B BASE 3.75 33.700 38.000 1742 0.380 0.000 0.0 0.0 25YR24HR POND B BASE 4.00 33.700 38.000 1742 0.398 0.000 0.1 0.0 25YR24HR POND B BASE 4.2S 33.700 38.000 1742 0.445 0.000 0.1 0.0 ' 25YR24HR POND B BASE 4.50 33.700 38.000 1742 0.475 0.000 0.1 0.0 25YR24HR POND B BASE 4.75 33.700 38.000 1742 0.495 0.000 0.1 0.0 2SYR24HR POND B BASE 5.00 33.700 38.000 1742 0.510 0.000 0.1 0.0 25YR24HR POND B BASH 5.25 33.700 38.000 1742 0.541 0.000 0.1 0.0 25YR24HR POND B BASE 5.50 33.700 38.000 1742 0.561 0.000 0.1 0.0 25YR24HR POND B BASE 5.75 33.700 38.000 1742 0.575 0.000 0.1 0.0 ' 25YR24HR POND B BASE 6.00 33.700 38.000 1742 0.586 0.000 0.1 0.0 25YR24HR POND B BASE 6.25 33.700 38.000 1742 0.655 0.000 0.2 0.0 25YR24HR POND B BASE 6.50 33.700 38.000 1742 .0.691 0.000 0.2 0.0 25YR24HR POND B BASE 6.75 33.700 38.000 1742 0.712 0.000 0.2 0.0 25YR24HR POND B BASE 7.00 33.700 38.000 1742 0.723 0.000 0.2 0.0 ' 25YR24HR POND B BASE 7.25 33.700 38.000 1742 0.796 0.000 0.2 0.0 25YR24HR POND B BASE 7.50 33.700 38.000 1742 0.833 0.000 0.2 0.0 25YR24HR POND B BASE 7.75 33.700 38.000 1742 0.855 0.000 0.2 0.0 25YR24HR POND B BASE 8..00 33.700 38.000 1742 0.867 0.000 0.3 0.0 25YR24HR POND B BASE 8.25 33.700 38.000 1742 0.963 0.000 0.3 0.0 ' 25YR24HR POND B BASE 8.50 33.700 38.000 1742 1.011 0.000 0.3 0.0 25YR24HR POND B BASE 8.75 33.700 38.000 1742 1.126 0.000 0.3 0.0 25YR24HR POND B BASE 9.00 33.701 38.000 1743 1.180 2.260 0.4 0.0' 25YR24HR POND B BASE 9.25 33.701 38.000 1743 1.253 2.260 0.4 0.1 25YR24HR POND B BASE 9.50 33.701 38.000 1743 1.288 2.260 0.4 0.1 2SYR24HR POND B BASE 9.75 33.700 38.000 1742 1.444 0.000 0.4 0.1 25YR24HR POND B BASE 10.00 33.700 38.000 1742 1.519 0.000 0.5 0.1 25YR24HR POND B BASE 10.25 33.701 38.000 1743 1.790 2.260 0.5 0.2 25YR24HR POND B BASE 10.50 33.702 38.000 1744 1.917 2.260 0.5 0.2 25YR24HR POND B BASE 10.75 33.702 38.000 1744 2.306 2.260 0.6 0.3 25YR24HR POND B BASE 11.00 33.770 38.000 1782 2.481 2.260 0.6 0.3 ' 25YR24HR POND B BASE 11.25 33.924 38.000 1870 2.669 2.260 0.7 0.4 25YR24HR POND B BASE 11.50 34.473 38.000 2181 4.331 2.260 0.8 0.4 25YR24HR POND B BASE 11.75 36.536 38.000 3516 12.948 2.260 0.9 0.4 25YR24HR POND B BASE 12.00 37.318 38.000 4197 24.511 23.919 1.3 0.7 25YR24HR POND B BASE 12.25 37.254 38.000 4142 18.422 18.781 1.8 1.2 ' 25YR24HR POND B BASE 12.50 37.151 38.000 4052 11.080 11.568 2.1 1.5 25YR24HR POND B BASE 12.75 37.061 38.000 3974 6.078 6.513 2.2 1.7 25YR24HR POND B BASE 13.00 37.002 38.000 3922 3.730 4.000 2.3 1.8 25YR24HR POND B BASE 13.25 36.968 38.000 3893 2.779 2.926 2.4 1.8 25YR24HR POND B BASE 13.50 36.952 38.000 3879 2.501 2.558 2.5 1.9 Interconnected Channel and Pond Routing Model (ICPR) ©2002 Streamline Technologies, Inc. Page 2 of 3 I ICPR Post Development 25yr -24hr Node Time Series #4667 Clearwater (Highland) 1 1 Simulation Node POty D 8 POND B BASE 13.75 Group Time Stage Warning S rface Total Total Total Total Stage Area Inflow Outflow Vol In Vol Out hrs ft ft ft cfs cfs of of 25YR24HR POND B BASE 13.75 36.931 38.0 3860 2.118 2.261 2.5 1.9 25YR24HR POND B BASE 14.00 36.860 38. 00 3816 1.968 2.260 2.6 2.0 25YR24HR POND B BASE 14.25 36.785 38 000 3733 1.757 2.260 2.6 2.0 25YR24HR POND B BASE 14.50 36.651 3 .000 3617 1.674 2.260 2.6 2.1 25YR24HR POND B BASE 14.75 36.480 .000 3467 1.492 2.260 2.7 2.1 25YR24HR POND B BASE 15.00 36.264 8.000 3280 1.417 2.260 2.7 2.2 25YR24HR POND B BASE 15.25 36.014 38.000 3062 1.337 2.260 2.7 2.2 25YR24HR POND B BASE 15.50 35.731 38.000 2896 1.307 2.260 2.7 2.3 25YR24HR POND B BASE 15.75 35.407 38.000 2712 '1.195 2.260 2.8 2.3 25YR24HR POND B BASE 16.00 35.031 38.000 2498 1.147 2.260 2.8 2.4 25YR24HR POND B BASE 16.25 34.596 38.000 2251 1.077 2.260 2.8 2.4 25YR24HR POND B BASE 4 38.000 1961 1.049 2.260 2.8 2.5 25YR24HR POND B BASE 16.75 33.70 38.000 1742 0.988 0.000 2.9 2.5 25YR24HR POND B BASE 17.00 33.700 38.000 1742 0.963 0.000 2.9 2.5 25YR24HR POND B BASE 17.25 33.700 38.000 1742 0.954 0.000 2.9 2.5 25YR24HR POND B BASE 17.50 33.700 38.000 1742 0.950 0.000 2.9 2.5 25YR24HR POND B, BASE 17.75 33.700 38.000 1742 0.848 0.000 2.9 2.5 25YR24HR POND B BASE 18.00 33.700 38.000 1742 0.803 0.000 3.0 2.5 25YR24HR POND B BASE 18.25 33.700 38.000 1742 0.836 0.000 3.0 2.5 25YR24HR POND B BASE 18.50 33.700 38.000 1742 0.853 0.000 3.0 2.5 25YR24HR POND B BASE 18.75 33.700 38.000 1742 0.760 0.000 3.0 2.5 25YR24HR POND B BASE 19.00 33.700 38.000 1742 0.717 0.000 3.0 2.5 25YR24HR POND B BASE 19.25 33.700 38.000 1742 0.749 0.000 3.0 2.5 25YR24HR POND B BASE 19.50 33.700 38.000 1742 0.767 0.000 3.1 2.5 25YR24HR POND B BASE 19.75 33.700 38.000 1742 0.725 0.000 3.1 2.5 25YR24HR POND B BASE 20.00 33.700 38.000 1742 0.705 0.000 3.1 2.5 25YR24HR POND B BASE 20.25 33.700 38.000 1742 0.643 0.000 3.1 2.5 25YR24HR POND B BASE 20.50 33.700 38.000 1742 0.618 0.000 3.1 2.5 25YR24HR POND B BASE 20.75 33.700 38.000 1742 0.609. 0.000 3.1 2.5 25YR24HR POND B BASE 21.00 33.700 38.000 1742 0.607 0.000 3.1 2.5 25YR24HR POND B BASE 21.25 33.700 38.000 1742 0.607 0.000 3.2 2.5 25YR24HR POND B BASE 21.50 33.700 38.000 1742 0.607 0.000 3.2 2.5 25YR24HR POND B BASE 21.75 33.700 38.000 1742 0.607 0.000 3.2 2.5 25YR24HR POND B BASE 22.00 33.700 38.000 1742 0.607 0.000 3.2 2.5 25YR24HR POND B BASE 22.25 33.700 38.000 1742 0.607 0.000 3.2 2.5 25YR24HR POND B BASE 22.50 33.700 38.000 1742 0.607 0.000 3.2 2.5 25YR24HR POND B BASE 22.75 33.700 38.000 1742 0.555 0.000 3.2 2.5 25YR24HR POND B BASE 23.00 33.700 38.000 1742 0.533 0.000 3.2 2.5 2SYR24HR POND B BASE 23.25 33.700 38.000 1742 0.522 0.000 3.2 2.5 25YR24HR POND B BASE 23.50 33.700 38.000 1742 0.519 0.000 3.3 2.5 25YR24HR POND B BASE 23.75 33.700 38.000 1742 0.468 0.000 3.3 2.5 25YR24HR POND B BASE 24.00 33.700 38.000 1742 0.000 0.000 3.3 2.5 25YR24HR POND B BASE 24.00 33.700 38.000 1742 0.000 0.000 3.3 2.5 i Interconnected Channel and Pond Routing Model (ICPR) 02002 Streamline Technologies, Inc. Page 3 of 3 1 Storm Tabs M MWOAffiRA1"ABMIO #MRM9-%-Si1P PROJECT: Wal -Mart Clearwater (Highland), Fl Store No. 4667 -00 JOB #: 47253651 PREPARED BY: NRL DATE: 3116/2007 CHECKED BY: DATE: LOCATION OF UPPER END U w M 2 M, V p i z v z DRAINAGE AREA AC p m y INLET . Z z W p U y W Lu i < O INCR. 6n U O 7 R K t7 O G� K w HYD. GRADE LINE TOTAL Z W o HYD. GRAD. ZONE: 8 I FRED: (YEAR) 10 PIPE TOTAL CROWN MINOR MINOR PHYSICAL C = 0.98- z z �= g 20 in 3 ? FLOWLINE FRICT. FRICT. MIN. PHYS. FRED. FACTOR: 1.00 C = 0.81 UPPER END ELEV. FT LOWER END ELEV. FALL FT h - O2 x r� ow U O ai U o a a iN+. �? MIN. HGL COVER= 0.00 AREA AC C = 0.79 MIN. PIPE COVER = 0.83 UPPER INCR. TOTAL REMARKS LOWER 0.09 ST 1 -1 Type D SO 20 0.08 0.08 0.08 10 0.13 7.47 0.09 0.00 0.64 38.00 38.00 37.99 0.00 0.00 1 1.0 18 0.00 0.4 0.64 1 0.00 0.00 35.89 35.85 0.04 0.00 0.20 2.7 4.71 ST 1 -13 0.01 0.01 0.01 10.00 0.00 34.39 34.35 0.00 0.013 0.18 2.5 4.42 0.00 ST 1 -13 MH SO 124 0.08 0.08 10 0.81 7.43 0.09 0.00 0.64 38.05 37.99 37.99 0.01 - 0.01 0.6 18 0.00 0.4 0.64 0.00 0.00 35.85 35.62 0.23 0.00 0.19 2.6 4.53 ST 1 -2 0.01 0.01 10.13 0.00 34.35 34.12 0.00 0.013 1 0.18 2.5 4.42 0.00 ST 1 -2 MH SD 32 0.08 0.08 10 0.21 7.22 0.09 0.00 0.62 38.00 37.99 37.99 0.00 0.00 0.6 18 0.00 0.4 0.62 0.00 0.00 35.62 35.56 0.06 0.00 0.19 2.6 4.56 ST 1 -3 0.01 0.01 10.93 0.00 34.12 34.06 0.00 0.013 0.18 2.5 4.42 1.79 ST 1-3 Type D SD 130 1.68 1.76 1.72 10 0.87 7.17 1.80 0.00 12.91 37.90 37.99 37.91 0.08 0.08 0.6 36 0.04 1.8 12.91 0.11 0.11 0.07 37.06 36.97 0.09 0.03 0.07 2.5 17.59 ST 1-4 r 0.01 0.01 11.14 0.00 34.06 33.97 0.05 1 0.013 0.07 2.5 - 17.66 0.83 ST 1.4 Type D SO 79 0.79 2.55 2.50 10 0.51 6.97 2.60 0.00 18.11 37.90 37.91 37.80 0.11 0.11 0.5 36 0.07 2.6 18.11 0.04 0.15 0.09 36.97 36.92 0.05 0.05 0.06 2.4 16.82 ST 1 -7 0.01 0.01 12.01 0.00 33.97 33.92 0.06 0.013 0.07 2.5 17.66 0.30 ST 15 Type D SO 46 0.04 0.04 0.04 10 1 0.29 7.47 1 0.20 0.00 1.48 37.84 37.87 37.85 0.02 0.02 1.0 18 0.02 0.8 1.48 0.26 0.26. 0.16 35.70 35.61_ 0.09 0.01 0.20 2.6 4.66 ST 1.6 0.00 0.00 10760 0.00 34.20 34.11 0.01 0.013 0.18 2.5 4.42 0.34 ST 1-6 Type 4 SD 150 0.10 0.14 0.14 10 0.97 _ 7.39 0.49 0.00 3.59 38.31 37.85 37.80 0.05 0.05 0.8 24 0.02 1.1 3.59 0.26 0.16 36.11 35.92 0.19 0.02 0.13 2.6 8.07 ST 1-7 0.24 0.24 0.19 10.29 0.00 34.11 33.92 0.04 0.013 0.12 2.5 1 7.85 0.00 ST 1 -7 MH RCP 70 2.69 2.64 10 0.47 6.86 3.08 0.00 21.15 38.67 37.80 37.69 0.11 0.11 1.0 42 0.04 2.2 21.15 _ 0.41 0.25 37.42 37.38 0.04 0.08 0.06 2.5 ST 1-8 0.25 0.20 12.52 0.00 33.92 33.88 0.03 0.013 0.06 2.5 0.80 ST 1.8 Type D RCP 65 0.77 3.46 3.39 10 0.40 6.76 _ 3.86 0.00 26.08 38.00 37.69 37.58 0.11 0.11 0.6 42 0607 2.7 Will be constructed with equivelant elliptical pipe with a 34" rise and 5" thickness 0.03 0.44 0.27 37.38 37.34 0.04 0.07 0.06 2.6 N244 ST 1 -9 0.25 0.20 12.99 0.00 33.88 33.84 0.04 0.013 0.06 2.5 0.00 ST 1 -9 MH RCP 192 3.46 3.39 10 1:19 6.68 3.86 0.00 25.77 38.00 37.58 37.40 0.18 0.18 0.5 42 0.07 2.7 Will be constructed with equivalent elliptical pipe with a 34" rise and 5" thickness 0.44 0.27 37.34 37.23 0.11 0.06 0.06 2.5 ST 1 -10 0.25 0.20 13.39 0.00 33.84 33.73 0.13 0.013 0.06 2.5 24.04 0.22 ST 1 -10 Type D - RCP 53 0.20 3.66 3.59 10 0.32 6.46 4.06 0.00 26.25 38.05 1 37.40 3717 0613 0013 008 42 0.07 2.7 26.25 Pond Bottom 33.7 0.02 0.46 0.28 L37.23 37420 0.03 0009 0.06 2.5 23.99 -B POND B 10yr, 24hr DHWL ST 1 -12 0.25 0.20 14.58 0.00 1 33.73 33.70 0.04 0.013 0.06 2.5 24.04 37.27 David W. Walthall, P.E. Florida Registration No. 62599 M M Kimley -Hom and Associates, Inc. 10117 Princess Palm Ave, Suite 300 Tampa, Florida 33610 -8304 (813) 620 -1460 M M MWOIRRA W B(WIO1W ROW -SiffiN PROJECT: Wal -Mart Clearwater (Highland), FI Store No. 4667 -00 JOB #: 47253651 PREPARED BY: NRL DATE: 3/16/2007 CHECKED BY: DATE: LOCATION OF UPPER END C V w K - ai z K i2 p a z LL z DRAINAGE AREA AC V p m y INLET Z 3 i OLL p F y m 3 < O INCR. N i"i, O LL, 3 w HYD. GRADE LINE TOTAL z o HYD. GRAD. ZONE: 6 FRED: (YEAR) 10 PIPE TOTAL CROWN MINOR MINOR PHYSICAL C = 0.98 i U O i t- rn U 3 ? FLOWLINE FRICT. FRICT. MIN. PHYS. FRED. FACTOR: _ 1.00 C = 0.81 UPPER END ELEV. LOWER END ELEV. FT FALL FT y x LL y OwO U w p y a LL. 3¢ N ci MIN. HGL COVER = 0.00 AREA AC C = 0.79 MIN. PIPE COVER = 0.83 UPPER INCR. TOTAL REMARKS LOWER 0.00 CS -1 CS SO 165 0.00 0.00 10 0.59 7.47 0.00 8.20 8.20 39:00 39.31 37.98 1.33 1.33 1 1.0 18 0.61 4.6 8.20 1 0.00 0.00 34.00 33.46 0.54 033 0.33 3.4 6.02 ST 2 -2 0.00 0.00 10.00 8.20 32.50 1 31.96 1.00 0.013 0.18 2.5 4.42 0.23 ST 2 -2A Yard SD 23 0.00 0.00 10 0.04 7.47 0.14 0.00 1.05 39.69 38.29 37.98 0.31 1 0.31 1.0 8 0.75 10 1.05 0.23 1 0.23 0.14 35.17 33.46 1.71 0.14 7.43 9.5 3.30 ST 2-2 0.00 0.00 10.00 0.00 34.50 32.79 0.17 0.013 0.52 2.5 0.87 0.00 ST 2 -2 MH SO 130 0.00 0.00 10 0.42 7.31 0.14 0.00 9.23 39.82 37.98 36.64 1.34 1.34 0.8 18 0.77 5.- 2 9.23 0.23 0.14 33.46 33.04 0.42 0.34 0.32 3. 5.98 ST2 -3 0.00 0.00 10.59 8.20 31.96 31.54 1.00 0.013 0.18 2.5 4.42 0.21 ST 2 -3A Yard SO 23 0.00 0.00 10 0.03 7.47 0.13 0.00 0.96 39.68 36.90 36.64 0.26 0.26 1.0 8 0.62 2.7 0.96 0.21 0.21 0.13 36.47 33.04 3.43 0.12 14.91 13.4 4.68 ST 2 -3 0.00 0.00 10.00 0.00 35.80 32.37 0.14 0.013 1 0.52 2.5 0.87 0.00 ST 2 -3 MH SO 96 0.00 0.00 10 0.28 7.21 0.27 0.00 10.13 39.82 36.64 35.34 1.30 1.30 0.8 18 0.93 5.7 10.13 0.44 0.27 33.04 32.73 0.31 0.41 0.32 3.4 5.98 ST 2-4 0.00 0.00 11.01 8.20 31.54 31.23 0.89 0.013 0.18 2.5 4.42 0.19 ST 2-4A Yard SD 23 0.00 0.00 10 0.03 7.47 0.12 0.00 0.87 39.68 36.67 35.34 1.32 0.21 1.0 8 0.51 2.5 0.87 0.19 0.19 0.12 36.67 33.23 3.44 0.10 14.96 13.4 4.68 ST 2-4 0.00 0.00 10.00 0.00 36.00 32.56 0.12 0.013 0.52 2.5 0.87 0.00 ST 2-4 MH SD 65 0.00 0.00 10 0.26 7.14 0.38 0.00 10.94 39.82 35.34 35.04 0.30 0.30 1 0.8 24 0.23 15 10.94 0.63 0.38 33.23 33.02 0.21 0.15 0.32 4.1 12.89 ST 2 -5 0.00 0.00 11.29 8.20 31.23 31.02 0.15 0.013 0.12 2.5 7.85 0.00 ST 2 -5 MH SD 128 0.00 0.00 10 0.54 7.08 0.38 0.00 10.92 39.82 35.04 34.59 0.45 0.45 0.8 24 0.23 3.5 10.92 0.63 0.38 [_33.02A 32.63 0.39 0.15 0.30 4.0 12.51 ST 2.6 0.00 0.00 11.55 8.20 31.02 30.63 0.30 0.013 0.12 2.5 7.85 0.00 CS -2 MH SO 36 0.00 1 0.00 10 0.19 7.47 0.00 17.63 17663 17663 3999 34.72 34.59 0.12 0.12 1.0 36 0.07 2.5 17.63 0.00 0.00 33.67 33.63 0.04 0.10 0.11 3.2 22.28 ST 2-6 0.00 0.00 10.00 30.67 30.63 0.03 0.013 1 0.07 2.5 17.66 0600 ST 2-6 MH SO 128 0.00 0.00 10 0.53 6.95 0.38, 28.50 39.36 34.59 34.16 0.43 0.43 0.8 36 0.18 4.0 28.50 Vault Bottom 30.5 0.63 0.38 33.63 33.50 0.13 0.20 0.10 3.0 21.30 Vault 10 r 24hr DHWL ST 2 -7 0.00 0.00 12.09 30.63 30.50 0.23 0.013 0.07 2.5 17.66 34.16 15�'.8 0.30 ST 3.1 Type D SO 69 0425 0.25 0.25 10 0.50 7.47 0.28 2606 38600 37028 37.27 0.01 0.01 1.0 24 0.01 0.7 2.06 Pond b Bottom 33.7 0605 0.05 0603 35.77 35.70 0.07 0.01 0610 2.3 7.17 Pond B 10 r, 24hr DHWL ST 3-2 o. Do I 0.00 16o o-1 0600 33.77 33.70 0.01 0.013 0.12 265 7.85 1 37627 David W. Walthall, P.E. Florida Registration No. 62599 Kimley -Horn and Associates, Inc. 10117 Princess Palm Ave, Suite 300 Tampa, Florida 33610.8304 (813) 620 -1460 _ #"ABl W10#*RMM.% -S1 a PROJECT: Wal -Mart Clearwater (Highland), Fl Store No. 4667 -00 PREPARED BY: NRL DATE: 3116/2007 JOB #: 47253651 CHECKED BY: DATE: LOCATION OF UPPER END W V m g rn z W it �? rn p a? _ DRAINAGE AREA AC U p U) INLET Z o z LL ? p ? w1? m K N < O r- INCR. tl1 U O j J � M (0 O ? ww HYD. GRADE LINE TOTAL z W o HYD. GRAD. ZONE: 6 FRED: (YEAR) 10 PIPE TOTAL CROWN MINOR MINOR PHYSICAL C = 0.98 i O _ i? r m U 3 ? FLOWLINE FRICT. FRICT. MIN. PHYS. FRED. FACTOR: 1.00 C = 0.61 UPPER END ELEV. FT LOWER END ELEV. FT FALL FT N x'�. LL y L u O 704 ci `. MIN, HGL COVER = 0.00 AREA AC C = 0.79 MIN. PIPE COVER = 0.83 UPPER INCR. TOTAL REMARKS LOWER 0.00 ST 4-1 Trenc SD 305 0.00 0.00 0.00 10 6.17 7.47 0.00 0.00 0.00 39.40 1 38.21 38.21 0.00 0.00 1.0 12 0.00 0.0 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 36.82 36.72 0.10 0.00 0.03 0.8 0.65 ST 4-2 0.00 0.00 10.00 0.00 35.82 35.72 0.00 0.013 0.30 2.5 1.96 1.12 ST 4 -2 MH SO 142 1.12 1.12 1.10 10 0.62 6.19 1.10 0.00 6.79 39.40 3811 37.50 0.71 0.71 0.5 18 0.42 3.8 6.79 Pond A Bottom 35.5 0.00 _0.00 - 0.00 37.12 37.00 0.12 0.11 0.08 1.7 3.06 Pond A 10 r 24hr DHWL _ ST 5.3 0.00 0.00 16.17 0.00 35.62 35.50 0.59 0.013 0.18 2.5 4.42 37.14 0.06 ST 5-1 Truck SD 68 0.06 0.06 0.06 10 0.86 7.47 0.06 0.00 0.44 36.45 37.67 37.63 0.04 0.04 1.0 10 0.04 0.8 0.44 0.00 1 0.00 36.53 36.46 0.07 .0.01 0.10 - 1.3 0.70 ST 5-2 0.00 0.00 10.00 0.00 35.70 35.63 0.03 0.013 0.39 2.5 1.36 _ 0.42 ST 5-2 Type D SD 131 0.40 0.46_ 0.45 10 0.96 7.24 0.46 0.00 3.35 38.88 37.63 37.50 013 0.04 0.5 24 0.02 1.1 3.35 1 0.02 0.02 0.01 37.63 37.50 0.13 0.01 0.10 2.3 7.14 ST 5.3 0.00 0.00 10.88. 0.00 35.63 35.50 0.03 0.013 0.12 _ 2.5 7.85 0.51 ST 5-3 Type 6 SD 29 0.47 0.93 0.91 10 0.23 - 7.01 0.95 0.00 6.64 138.15 37.50 37.14 0.36 0.09 1.0 24 0.09 2.1 6.64 Pond A Bottom 35.5 0.04 0.06 0.04 37.50' 37.50 0.00 0.07 0.00 0.0 0.00 Pond A 10 r 24hr DHWL ST Sd 0.00 0.00 11.84 0.00 35.50 35.50 0.02 0.013 0.12 2.5 7.85 37.14 Kimley -Horn and Associates, Inc. 10117 Princess Palm Ave, Suite 300 David W. Walthall, P.E. Tampa, Florida 33610 -8304 Florida Registration No. 62599 (613) 620 -1460 Hydraulic Grade Line Profile Hydraulic Grade Line Profiles Run 1 39 38.8 38:6 38.4 c 3 8. 2 M -�— HGL �� h >y� 38- 37.8 _ Proposed w 37:6 Grade 37.4 � $ ' IWO 37.2 314 MEM ST 1 -12 ST 1 -10 ST 1 -9 ST 1-8 ST 1 -7 ST 1-6 ST 1S ST 14 ST 1 -3 ST 1 -2 ST 1 -13 ST 1 -1 Structure ' 39.5 c 39.0 ' o 38.5 d w ' 38.0 37.5 1 1 38.5 38 0 37.5 37 1 36 35.5 Hydraulic Grade Line Profiles Run 4 -� HGL -�- Proposed G' rade ST 4 -2 ST 4 -1 Structure Run 5* m ST 5 -3 ST 5 -3 ' Structure ' 'ST 5 -1 represents the truck dock inlet Section 4 Appendix A.1 cleanvater Beach '! II :acn_ , — Palm I Har o bor ( 501 752 611 � 58Br f'J 19 " 19 Dunedin ;ac Clearwater (D 69 .913 651 375 488 Dent Of ff HILLSBOROUGH 7 F L O R L D A; 589 I 584 Linec Oldsmar .�l arse 'Po Vq tr a i Rd M Ave W Safety Harbor 578 I �Cleamuater 60 -- Tar{ Air Park International —" Airport .. 611 '•. 0 ° °i., .888 St. Pats rsburg /Clealwatar._: -�•0 IL !; International Airport B P N E L L S I j ` 688 t9 i Ave 887 92 N� ^ 298 � :. 2 - ro —1f., Lb suo o liens. All ri ❑hts resew d Site Q Bermuda St Belleair Belleair Belleair Beach, Bluffs, a Idlaril Or La n Rocks 233 Beach, Ashton Ivg 5 St �� 888 Atli L�— Dent Of ff HILLSBOROUGH 7 F L O R L D A; 589 I 584 Linec Oldsmar .�l arse 'Po Vq tr a i Rd M Ave W Safety Harbor 578 I �Cleamuater 60 -- Tar{ Air Park International —" Airport .. 611 '•. 0 ° °i., .888 St. Pats rsburg /Clealwatar._: -�•0 IL !; International Airport B P N E L L S I j ` 688 t9 i Ave 887 92 N� ^ 298 � :. 2 - ro —1f., Lb suo o liens. All ri ❑hts resew d Site Q Bermuda St m a c Pine o, fl a Idlaril Or Q a 77 D 3 Woodlawri Terrace o Ashton Ivg 5 St �� B"m Or -I F _ Rd Algonquin Dr K t` = Circle —i U li2abeth - Erin Ln point Rd , (—� 345' i ... _ --. 36� i.__ �! —___. 1576 Spring Ln -n o I !j � o Joel Ln I, I��•r -� - -' Otten St d o` o 10 e { f I� a t rcBk it Sandy Ln L o a_ m J co 6 qyo cn Terrace Rd 375 Linwood Ds F1agler Or m St Fairmont St Claire Dr �I S m Fairmont St lI II C' m G Parkwood St t St Woodbine St = - '4 8 w Scott St -1 _J Cr. L St- Springdale St Coovriaht02004Microsofr Coro. and /.rihsuoo liens. All dams rosanrod A o I. She woad a r.,_.. ,�. m `L Lake Kimley -Hom SITE LOCATION MAP and Associates, Inc. WAL -MART - CLEARWATER (HIGHLAND), FL 10117 Princess Palm Avenue, Suite 300 STORE NO. 97873, WNM Tampa, Florida 33610 CITY OF CLEARWATER, FL Phone: (813) 620 -1460 Fax: (813) 620 -1542 Copyright 2006, Kim PR ley -Horn and Associates, Inc. SCALE: NTS OJ N 047253651 I DATEOctober 2006 FIGURE: 1 A,92 0 u s Sources: Aerial Express. 2003 AE, LLC. 2003 GDT, Inc. Southwest Florida Water Management District. GIs Data. USDA/SCS Soil Survey of Pinellas County, Florida. September, 1972. FAESS Hydric Soils of Florida Handbook. Third Edition. March 2000. IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIN F1 Kimley -Horn Aerial Map IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIE and Associates, Inc. WAL -MART - CLEARWATER (HIGHLAND), F 10117 Princess Palm Avenue, Suite 300 Tampa, Florida 33610 STORE NO. 97873, WNM Phone: (813) 620 -1460 CITY OF CLEARWATER, FL Fax: (813) 620 -1542 SCALE: PROJ. NO DATE: FIGURE: Copyright 2007, Kimley -Horn and Associates, Inc. 1 inch equals 400 feet 047253651 February 2007 A•2 Sources: Aerial Express. 2003 AE, LLC. 2003 GDT, Inc. Southwest Florida Water Management District. GIS Data. USDA /SCS Soil Survey of Pinellas County, Florida. September, 1972 FAESS Hydric Soils of Florida Handbook. Third Edition. March 2000. LEGEND 5 = Astatula fine sand /moderately deep water table 18 = Myakka fine sand + IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIN Kimley -Horn USDA /SCS SOILS MAP II and _ and Associates, Inc. WAL -MART - CLEARWATER (HIGHLAND), FL 10117 Princess Palm Avenue, Suite 300 Tampa, Florida 33610 STORE NO. 97873, WNM Phone: (813) 620 -1460 CITY OF CLEARWATER, FL Fax: (813) 620 -1542 SCALE: PROJ.NO. DATE: FIGURE: Copyright 2007, Kimley -Horn and Associates, Inc. NITS 047253651 February 2007 A.3 A.4 11 II Source: 3 -D TopoQuads. 1990 DeLorme Yarmouth ME 04096. Source Data: USGS, Section 2, Township 29 S, Range 15 E f ::= " Kimley -Horn 1987 USGS QUADRANGLE MAP - CLEARWATER, FL IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIN and Associates, Inc. WAL -MART CLEARWATER (HIGHLAND), FL 10117 Princess Palm Avenue, Suite 300 STORE NO. 97873 WNM Tampa, Florida 33610 Phone: (813) 620 -1460 CITY OF CLEARWATER, FL Fax: (813) 620 -1542 SCALE: PROJ. NO.: DATE: FIGURE: Copyright 2007, Kimley -Horn and Associates, Inc. NTS 047253651 1 February 2007 A•4 1 :�'; - SITE : , , �. -K, , , 't.�:. f.�' .f� 'c �:r� f r 1r! ..r� • .;yY. .� fir.. R l�. ,�s4` �•T> I '., 2, ri'ir a +i: Kya >: � nf;, i -`= ,�, ... - i �, .L, �,i,, s;• J,l.i.`��i, 1 .t, .rr 4:'•r t }:, r:;;!:' ;ayi•M1:S •,v,'::`:' ?', >:� �'.P!i ?, ...... ..... : ' .F '�'� yam• :.'- .,, '��•+ 'y t. !� ., r- ?.5•�f T . X {, ".J ''t `tom - Y Y.'�•!k.`�' K:!.•_ ''k'Y�t�Y:f3. ': J f. `�''� -;'- ':;7 :L •3s ^'4 ! .� i:� Source: 3 -D TopoQuads. 1990 DeLorme Yarmouth ME 04096. Source Data: USGS, Section 2, Township 29 S, Range 15 E f ::= " Kimley -Horn 1987 USGS QUADRANGLE MAP - CLEARWATER, FL IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIN and Associates, Inc. WAL -MART CLEARWATER (HIGHLAND), FL 10117 Princess Palm Avenue, Suite 300 STORE NO. 97873 WNM Tampa, Florida 33610 Phone: (813) 620 -1460 CITY OF CLEARWATER, FL Fax: (813) 620 -1542 SCALE: PROJ. NO.: DATE: FIGURE: Copyright 2007, Kimley -Horn and Associates, Inc. NTS 047253651 1 February 2007 A•4 A,95 t i Site GROVE 3E COURT Areas 125139 x LEGEND Zone X — Areas determined to be outside the 500 -year floodplain APPROXIMATE SCALE 500 - 0 - - 500 FEET NATIONAL RUB INSURANCE PROGRAM FIRM FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA AND INCORPORATED AREAS PANEL 101 OF 321 (aee — R— FOR F—Eta NOT vaia.ED) WNW m e en ottelel copy o1a On-Lin eTtae map do- n t r fect h- a a endm ent using F -MIT On -Line. m ma0 ba net rto the cate on en - For which may hero been made subsequent a the dale on the e lMacK For the latest Ixotluct information about abtlonal Flood Insurance ±I Ki mley -Hom FEMA FLOODPLAIN MAP and Air Inc. WAL -MART — CLEARWATER (HIGHLAND), FL 10117 Princess Palm Avenue, Suite 300 STORE NO. 97873, WNM Tampa, Florida 33610 CITY OF CLEARWATER, FL Phone: (813) 620 -1460 Fax: (813) 620 -1542 Copyright 2006, Kimley -Horn and Associates, Inc. - SCALE: As Shown 1 PROJ. N 11 047253651 I DATE: FIGURE: October 2006 5 MAP NUMBER 12103CO197H MAP REV MAY 17, 20 20 05 5 Federal Emeegmcy Maaep<mwt Agency m e en ottelel copy o1a On-Lin eTtae map do- n t r fect h- a a endm ent using F -MIT On -Line. m ma0 ba net rto the cate on en - For which may hero been made subsequent a the dale on the e lMacK For the latest Ixotluct information about abtlonal Flood Insurance ±I Ki mley -Hom FEMA FLOODPLAIN MAP and Air Inc. WAL -MART — CLEARWATER (HIGHLAND), FL 10117 Princess Palm Avenue, Suite 300 STORE NO. 97873, WNM Tampa, Florida 33610 CITY OF CLEARWATER, FL Phone: (813) 620 -1460 Fax: (813) 620 -1542 Copyright 2006, Kimley -Horn and Associates, Inc. - SCALE: As Shown 1 PROJ. N 11 047253651 I DATE: FIGURE: October 2006 5 A.6 Kimley -Horn and Associates, Inc. March 29, 2007 Mr. J. Chris Callaway Wal*Mart Stores East, Inc. 2001 S.E. 10th Street Bentonville, AR 72716 -0550 (479) 273 -4290 Re: Store #4667 -00, Clearwater, Florida, North highland Ave. and Greenlea Drive Stormwater Management System Operation and Maintenance ii Dear Mr. Callaway: Pursuant to Southwest Florida Water Management District regulations as set forth in form# 62- 343.900(1) Section E, Environmental Resource Permit Application, Part F, Item 1 and District policy, the owner of the proposed stormwater system must be informed of his responsibility to the Operation and Maintenance of this facility. In short, the Operation and Maintenance program is-broken out into three categories: Maintenance of Grassed Areas, Maintenance of Parking Areas, and an Operation Inspection Schedule. The specifics of the program are enclosed with this letter to explain in further detail. A co of this letter copy will be included in our submission of the Environmental Resource Permit for this site as proof to the District that the owner of this site has been informed of his responsibilities. No action is required on your part at this time. r � Should you need any further information or have any questions, please feel free to contact us. Sincerely, KFMMEY -HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. F? _ ZWalthall,- P.E. Project Manager • TEL 813 620 1460 FAX 813 620 1542 ■ Suite 300 10117 Princess Palm Avenue Tampa, Florida 33610 -8304 Wal *Mart — Clearwater (Highland), FL Store No. 4667 -00, Neighborhood Market NE corner of Highland Ave. and Greenlea Dr. STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE PROGRAM 1.0 MAINTENANCE OF GRASSED AREAS Once sodded and established, all grassed areas shall be mowed regularly and maintained free from bare earth conditions to prevent the potential for erosion. Grass clippings shall be collected and disposed of properly. Clippings shall not be disposed of in any created lakes or wetlands, swales, ditches or any other drainage facility. 2.0 MAINTENANCE OF PARKING FACILITIES Regularly scheduled vacuum sweeping, or other appropriate methods, of all common streets, parking lots and paved areas within the development. All parcel and/or lot owners within the development shall undertake similar sweeping programs within their properties. 3.0 OPERATION INSPECTION SCHEDULE �t Operation inspections by a qualified professional shall be conducted to assure that the surface water management system functions as designed. The frequency of these inspections shall be semi - annually for the first three years and annually r thereafter. Spot inspections during rainstorm events may also be periodically warranted. The following features of the surface water management system shall be inspected during each visitation. 3.1 STORMWATER RETENTION PONDS The ponds remove treatment volume via infiltration through the filter fabric and r underdrain system beneath the pond. Inspections of the of the stormwater pond will include a general review of the pond conditions with respect to slope stability, infiltration efficiency, and vegetative cover. Bank slopes will be inspected for signs or erosion, settlement, and slope failure. 1 If the infiltration rate of the stormwater retention pond appears to be restricted such that it is limiting system performance, the pond bottom shall be diced to displace accumulated fines in the pond bottom. 3.2 VEGETATION The need for vegetation harvesting or spraying will be determined. Grassed areas such as swales and lake banks will also be inspected to determine the need for mowing, reseeding or fertilization. 3.3 INLET/ OUTFALL STRUCTURES System structures will be inspected ensuring no obstructions to flow (i.e. debris) exist that would reduce the flow capacity of the system. The structural condition of inlets will also be inspected for evidence of pipe separation, settlement, or concrete deterioration. 3.4 CONVEYANCE SYSTEM The conveyance system which includes storm sewer piping, inlets, and junction boxes will be inspected for structural and functional integrity. Evidence of seepage, restricted flow, or turbid discharges will be noted. 3.5 FILL AREAS Areas which have been, filled and stabilized adjacent to any portion of the surface water management system (including wetlands) will be .inspected for evidence of settlement, erosion or slope failure. 3:6 UNDERGROUND VAULTS An underground vault has been designed to provide stormwater attenuation for this site. Observation of the vault should be performed for cracking, spilling and seepage. Observation should be made of the access covers for excessive wear. Access to the underground vault via access openings is provided for the maintenance of the system to include removal of sediment and debris and unclogging of the system. Observation should be made to ensure the structural openings within the 12" masonry walls are open and clean of debris that would impede the flow of water through the vault system. 3.7 UNDERDRAIN WITH FILTER FABRIC The underdrain is required to be free from clogging. If the vault system is found to not recover within 24 -hours of the most recent storm event and standing water still exists at that time, the underdrain should be inspected for clogging. Unclogging of the piping may be performed by backflushing the drain pipes. Filter media clogging may require. removal and replacement of the filter media. Removed filter media is to be disposed of in accordance with local disposal regulations, and as further described below. The filter material should be inspected for sediment buildup, which could restrict the filtration of the collected stormwater. Upon completion of any items requiring correction or general maintenance, the Engineer will certify to SWFWMD that the system is functioning as designed and permitted. The discharge system will also be subject to the SWFWMD permit requirements and inspected generally every 18 to 24 months. Said inspection will focus on visually verifying that the discharge The filtration system will be inspected to ensure that there is no erosion or .sedimentation build -up that would impede percolation of water through the filter media, and that the underdrain is not clogged and does not have restrictive flow. 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 A,07 Chapter 2 Cstimating Runoff Table 2 -2a Runoff curve numbers for urban areas Ii Cover descril a ion Technical Release 55 Urban Hydrology for Small Watersheds Curve numbers for - -- hydrologic soil group Average percent Cover type and hydrologic condition impervious area Z✓ A B C D Fully developed urban areas (vegetation c- stablished) l Open space (lawns, parks, golf courses, ceiiteLe.ries, etc.) -': Poor condition (grass cover < 50'x:) ........... ............................... 68 79 86 89 'e Fair condition (grass cover 50% to 7 51Y(i) ... .......................:....... 49 69 Good condition (grass cover > 75°f�.) .......:.. ............................... 39 61 Impervious areas: 79 74 84 80 Paved parking lots, roofs, driveways, vi . (excluding right -of -way) ............................ ............................... 98 98 Streets and roads: 98 98 Paved; curbs and storm sewers (c( hiding right -of -way) ................................................. ............................... 98 98 98 98 Paved; open ditches (including rigiu -(A-way) .......................... 83 89 92 93 Gravel (including right -of -way) .................. ............................... 76 85 Dirt (including right -of -way) ...................................................... 72 82 89 87 91 89 } Western desert urban areas: Natural desert landscaping (pervious urcas only) ai ..................... 63 77 85 88 Z Artificial desert landscaping (impervious weed barrier, desert shrub with 1- to 24nch sand or gravel mulch b and basin borders) ....................................... ..........................:.... 96 96 96 96 Urban districts: Commercial and business .................................. ............................... 85 89 92 Industrial................................:............................. ...................:........... 72 81 88 94 91 95 93 �i Residential districts by average lot size: 1/8 acre or less (town houses) ........................... ............................... 65 77 85 90 92 1/4 acre .............................................................:... ............................... 38 61 75 83 87 T1B acre ................................................................. ............................... 30 57 .. 72 1/2 acre ................................................................. ............................... 25 54 70 ...................... ............................... . 1 acre .......... ............................... :.... 20 51 68 81 80 79 86 85 84 2 acres ................................................................... ............................... 12 46 65 77 82 'P Developing urban areas Newly g1' aded areas (pervious areas only, no vegetation) 5/ ................................. ............................... 77 86 Idle lands (CN's are determined using cover types 91 94 similar to those in le tab 2-2c). 1 Average runoff condition, and I, = 0.2S. Z The average percent impervious area show+{ a%as nsed to develop the composite CN's. Other assumptions are as follows: impervious areas are directly connected to the drainage i ,'• ag system, imi,ecvious areas have a CN of ri and pervious areas are considered equivalent to open space in good hydrologic condition. CN's for other c•o!::binations of conditions may be computed using figure 2-3 or 24. 8 CN's shown are equivalent to those of pasture Unuposite CN's maybe computed for other combinations of open space cover type. y 4 Composite CN's for natural desert landscaping should be computed using figures 23 or 24 based on the impervious area percentage (CN = 98) and the pervious area CN. The pervious area CN's are assumed equivalent to desert shrub in poor hydrologic condition. 6 Composite CN's to use for the design of temporaiy measures dining grading and construction should be computed using figure 2.3 or 24 based on the degree of development (impervious area percentage) and the (.Ns for the newly graded pervious areas. �1 (210- VI- TR-55, Second lid., June 1986) 2-6 c r 1 • 1 I` I` I" I9 r REPORT OF GEOTECHNICAL EXPLORATION FOR. WPI*MAU@ STORE NO. 97873, WNM CLEARWATER (HIGHLAND) PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA MACTEC Project No. 6513 -06 -0450 Prepared for: KIMLEY -HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. Tampa, Florida Prepared by:.. MACTEC ENGINEERING AND CONSULTING, INC. Tampa, Florida November 10, 2006 MACTEC Project 6513 -06 -0450 AMACTEC OMACTEC engineering and constructing a better tomorrow iI 1l November 10, 2006 Wal -Mart Stores, Inc. c/o Mr. David Walthall, P.E. Kimley -Horn and Associates, Inc. 10117 Princess Palm Avenue, Suite 300 Tampa, Florida 33610 (813) 620 -1460 - Phone (813) 6201542 - Fax Subject: Report of Geotechnical Exploration P P Wal *Mart — CLEARWATER (HIGHLAND) STORE NO. 97873 WNM Pinellas County, Florida MACTEC Project No. 6513 -06 -0450 Dear Mr. Walthall, MACTEC Engineering and Consulting, Inc. (formerly Law Engineering and Environmental Services, Inc.) has performed a geotechnical study for the subject project. Our services were conducted in general accordance with MACTEC Proposal TG06 -074, dated October 2, 2006. Our services were performed in general accordance with the terms of our Master Agreement for 1 Continuing rofessional Services dated March 14 2003 and with the Wal *M " g art Geotechnical Investigation Specifications and Report Requirements" dated July 5, 2006. This report is for the exclusive use of Kimley Horn & Associates, Inc. and Wal *Mart Stores, Inc. and their successors and ! assigns. 1 The borings performed at the site, first penetrated a veneer of asphalt and limerock base, underlain by sandy soils to depths ranging from 6 to 18 feet. Clay and indurated clay was then encountered beneath the sandy layers to the termination depth of the borings (10 -foot, 20 -foot, and 25 -foot and 50 -foot borings). Some of the clay samples in borings B -1, B -2 and B-4 contained trace of limestone fragments at depths below 18 feet. A layer of limestone /weathered limestone strata was penetrated in borings B -2 and B -10 at depths of 28 and 26 feet, respectively. We recommend that foundations be designed using an allowable bearing pressure of 2,500 psf, subject to the constraints presented in the Recommendations section of this report. We anticipate column and wall settlements on the order of 3/a inch. The existing pavement should be pulverized and blended with the upper 12 inches of subgrade to provide a stabilized subgrade. In the heavy duty pavement areas this stabilized subgrade should have an LBR of at least 40. MACTEC Engineering and Consulting, Inc. 4919 W. laurel Street • Tampa, FL 33607 • Phone: 813.289.0750 • 813.289.5474 www.mactec.com �I �I i �i I I i Wal *Mart — Clearwater (Highland) Store No. 97873, WNM November 10, 2006 Pinellas County,FL Report of Geotechnical Ezploration- MACTEC Project 6513 -06 -0450 We have enjoyed assisting you and look forward to serving as your geotechnical consultant on the remainder of this project. If you have any questions concerning this report, please contact us. Sincerely, MACTEC ENGINEERING AND CONSULTING, INC. tni aquel Florence, E.I. Curtis J. Roos, P.E. otechnical Professional Chief Engineer Florida Registration 27570 P : \GEOTECIA2006\Projects\6513 -06 -0450 Walman HighlanMeportdoc Distribution: 6 — Addressee 1 — Addressee Electronic 1 —File it 1,i Wal *Mart — Clearwater (Highland) Store No. 97873, WNM November 10, 2006 Pinellas County,FL Report of Geotechnical Exploration MACTEC Project 6513 -06 -0450 TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION PAGE NUMBER 1.0 PROJECT INFORMATION AND STRUCTURAL CONDITIONS ...................... 1 1.1 GENERAL ..............................:.................................... ............................... 1 1.2 STRUCTURAL AND VEHICULAR LOADING INFORMATION......... 2 2.0 FIELD EXPLORATION .......................................................... ............................... 4 2.1 FIELD EXPLORATION ............................................. ............................... 4 2.2 LABORATORY TESTING ......................................... ............................... 5 5.8 EXCAVATION SLOPES ................................................. ............................... 18 5.9 'ADDITIONAL EXPLORATIONIREVIEW OF PLANS & SPECS............ 19 3.0 SITE AND SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS ', lii 3.1 3.2 SITE CONDITIIONS .............................................. ............................... , . SOIL SURVEY ............................................................ ............................... 5 6. 3.3 USGS TOPOGRAPHY SURVEY ...................... ............................... 'j 3.4 SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS .................................. ............................... 3.4.1 General ........................................................................... 4............ 7 7 3.4.2 Soils .......... :..................................................................................... 7 3.4.3 Ground Water......'....... 3.4.4 Estimated Seasonal High Water Table ........... ............................... 7 8 -4.0 EVALUATION .......................................................................... ............................... 9 4.1 SETTLEMENT POTENTIAL ..................................... ............................... 9 4.2 SOIL. CORROSION POTENTIAL .............................. ............................... 9 4.3 SEISMIC CONSIDERATIONS .................................. ............................... 9 4.4 SINKHOLE CONSIDERATIONS .............................. ............................... 10 ' 4.5 SOIL SUBSIDENCE CONDITIONS .......................... ............................... 10 5.0 RECOMMENDATIONS FOR FOUNDATION DESIGN AND SITE PREPARATION...................................................................... ............................... . 5.1 BASIS FOR RECOMMENDATIONS ........................ ............................... 11 ' 5.2 SITE PREPARATION ................................................. ............................... 5.2.1 Demolition, Clearing and Stripping ................ ............................... 11 11 5.2.2 Proofrolling of Exposed Surface Soils ............ ...................... .I........ 12 5.3 5.2.3 Structural Filling and Backfilling SHALLOW FOUNDATION DESIGN ....................... ............................... 13 5.4 FLOOR SLAB DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION .... ............................... 13 5.5 EARTHPRESSURE PARAMETERS FOR RETAINING WALLS .......... 14 5.6 GENERAL CONSTRUCTION MONITORING AND TESTING ............ 15 5.7 PAVEMENT RECOMMENDATIONS ............... ............................... 5.7.1 Subgrade ..................................................:....... ............................... 15 5.7.2 Base Course .................................................... ................ ................ 16 5.7.3 Asphalt Concrete ............ :.................... .............. : ............................ 16 5.7.4 Rigid Concrete Pavement .................................... ............................... 17 5.8 EXCAVATION SLOPES ................................................. ............................... 18 5.9 'ADDITIONAL EXPLORATIONIREVIEW OF PLANS & SPECS............ 19 ', lii I i 'I t Wal 'Mart — Clearwater (Highland) Store No. 97873, WNM Pinellas County, FL MACTEC Project 6513 -06 -0450 APPENDIX A - November 10, 2006 Report of Geotechnical Exploration SiteVicinity Map (Fig. 1) ................................................................ ............................... A -1 FieldExploration Plan (Fig. 2) ............................................:........... ............................... A -2 Soil Conservation Service Map (Fig. 3) ........................................... ............................... A -3 USGSSite Vicinity Map (Fig. 4) ..................................................... ................. .............. A-4 Key to Classifications and Symbols ................................................. ............................... A -5 Generalized Subsurface Profiles (Figs. 5) ........................................ ............................... A -6 SoilTest Boring Records ................................................................. ............................... A -7 APPENDIX B Summary of Laboratory Test Results ( Geotechnical) ...................... ............................... B -1 Report of Soil Corrosion Property Test Results ............................... ............................... B -2 Limerock Bearing Ratio (LBR) Test Results ................................... ............................... B -3 Double Ring Infiltration (DRI) Test Results ...:................................ ............................... B-4 Borehole Permeability Test Results ................................................. ............................... B -5 Pavement Thickness Measurements ................................................ ............................... B -6 APPENDIX C Geotechnical Investigation Fact Sheet .......................... ............................... Foundation Design Criteria ........................................... ............................... Foundation Subsurface Preparation ......................... . .............................. :.... Pavement Design Sketch (Fig. 6) .................................. ............................... PavementCalculations .................................................. ............................... Checklist . --- __ - -. _— - - -- -- ' iv C -1 C -2 C -3 C-4 C -5 -C -6 Wal '♦Mart — Clearwater (Highland) Store No. 97873, WNM November 10, 2006 Pinellas CounMFL Report of Geotechnical Exploration ' MACTEC Project 6513 -06 -0450 1.0 PROTECT INFORMATION AND STRUCTURAL CONDITIONS 1.1 GENERAL The purpose of this exploration was to develop information concerning the site and subsurface conditions in order to evaluate site preparation requirements and foundation alternatives for support of the planned retail store in Clearwater,. Florida. This report briefly describes the field and laboratory testing activities and presents the findings. The enclosed recommendations for site preparation and foundation design and construction represent approaches we feel would be appropriate for the planned construction. As shown on the Site Vicinity Map in Appendix A, the Wal*Mart Neighborhood Market Clearwater (Store No. 97873) will be located at the Highland Square commercial center, in the northeast quadrant of the intersection of N. Highland Avenue and Greenlea Drive in Clearwater, Florida. The proposed store will have a total plan area of 39,714 square feet. A current dry retention pond located in the northeast corner of the project site is planned to remain and expand to attenuate the stormwater runoff from behind the retail center. A new stormwater retention vault is planned for additional drainage /treatment in the area that is currently used for parking, west of the new store. Generally, the proposed construction will include a one -story retail store having a combination of concrete masonry shear walls (load - bearing and non- load - bearing) and steel columns supporting roof loads by means of steel joist girders and steel bar joists. Perimeter walls will be tied to the building slab with dowels. The typical bay spacing between columns and walls will be approximately 43 feet by 60 feet. Exterior columns will typically be spaced 60 feet apart. Additional structural loading information is discussed in the following section. J Wal *Mart — Clearwater (Highland) Store No. 97873, WNM November 10, 2006 Pinellas County, FL Report of Geotechnical Exploration MACTEC Project 6513 -06 -0450 1.2 STRUCTURAL AND VEHICULAR LOADING INFORMATION Furnished structural loading information for the building is summarized in Table 1: Table 1: Summary of Structural Loading Information Typical interior column load 85 kips Maximum column load due to severe live loading 150 kips Typical exterior column load 50 kips Concrete Masonry Wall Load (non- load - bearing walls) 1.5 to 2.0 klf Concrete Masonry Wall Load, {load- bearing walls) 4.0 to 6.0 klf Maximum uniform floor slab live load 125 psf Maximum floor slab concentrated load 5.0 kips Maximum column u lift load from wind 30 kips The maximum allowable differential settlements for soils supporting masonry walls is considered to be L /900, where L is the horizontal distance between control joints in the masonry wall (typically 40 feet). In the event the exterior wail is constructed using tilt -up concrete.panels in lieu of CMU, the maximum differential settlement is limited to L /500. The maximum allowable . differential settlements for soils supporting interior slabs or interior isolated footings is considered to be L/500, where L is the horizontal distance between any two columns or any two interior points on the floor slab (0.96 inches in 40 feet). The allowable differential vertical - settlement (or heave) between the exterior wall and adjacent floor slab is %2 inch. The allowable differential movement between interior footings and adjacent interior floor slabs is equal to L/500, as discussed previously. Total movements.should not exceed 3/4-inch. New pavement areas for automobile/light truck parking are planned primarily to the west and south of the store and heavy truck loading/unloading parking and driveways are planned east of the proposed store. Vehicular traffic information is summarized in Table 2: -2- Wal *Mart — Clearwater (Highland) Store No. 97873, WNM Pinellas County, FL MACTEC Project 6513 -06 -0450 November 10, 2006 Report of Geolechnical Exploration Table 2: Summary of Vehicular Traffic Information Neighborhood Market Standard Duty Pavement: - A design life of 20 years, based on a minimum ESAL (18 -kip) load applications per day of 15.0 ( 109,500 ESALs); - Design Reliability = 85% at an overall standard deviation of 0.45 for flexible pavements and 0.35 for rigid pavements; - Initial Serviceability = 4.2; Terminal Serviceability = 2.0; - Minimum Asphalt thickness = 3.0 inches (unless justified otherwise by engineering calculations); - Minimum concrete thickness 5.0 inches (unless justified otherwise by engineering calculations). Neighborhood Market Heavy Duty Pavement: - A design life of 20 years, based on a minimum ESAL (18 -kip) load applications per day of 29 { 211,700 ESALs }; - Design Reliability = 85% at an overall standard deviation of 0.45 for flexible pavements and 0.35 for rigid pavements; Initial Serviceability = 4.2; Terminal Serviceability = 2.0; - Minimum asphalt thickness 4.0 inches (unless justified otherwise by engineering calculations); - Minimum concrete thickness = 6.0 inches (unless justified otherwise by engineering calculations) - '- - - - - -- - - - - --- -3- Wal *Mart — Clearwater (Highland) Store No. 97873, WNM November 10, 2006 Pinellas County, FL Report of Geotechnical Exploration MACTEC Project 6513 -06 -0450 2.0 FIELD EXPLORATION 2.1 FIELD EXPLORATION In order to obtain information on the general subsurface conditions at the proposed project site in the proposed building and pavement areas, the following scope of field exploration was performed: i i - 9 borings to a depth of 20 - 50 feet in the proposed building area. - 5 borings to a depth of 25 feet in the existing pond, proposed pond extension and stormwater vault. - 12 borings to a depth of 10 feet in the proposed pavement areas. - 1 Double Ring Infiltration (DRI) Test in the pond expansion area and 1 Borehole Permeability Test in the proposed vault area. - 1 Limerock Bearing Ratio (LBR) Test on soils excavated from the existing pond. The SPT boring locations are shown on the Field Exploration Plan (Figure 2) in Appendix A. These locations were selected by MACTEC personnel. The borings were located in the field by MACTEC personnel using a compass and by measuring with a measuring tape from the existing building and parking features. ' The Soil Test Boring Records, in Appendix A, graphically show the penetration resistances and present the soil descriptions for each SPT boring. The stratification lines and depth designations on the boring records represent the approximate boundaries between soil types. In some instances, the transition between soil types may be gradual. The DRI test (DRI -1) was performed at a depth of 1 -foot, in the proposed stormwater retention pond ' expansion area. The DRI Test. was performed for a total duration of four hours in general accordance with ASTM Test Designation D -3385, titled "Infiltration Rate of Soils In Field Using Double -Ring Infiltrometer ". The results of the DRI tests, have been tabulated in the Appendix of the report. The Borehole Permeability Test (Location B -13) was performed in the proposed stormwater vault ' area. The test was performed for a period of 15 minutes, after achieving a stabilization pumping rate. The horizontal and vertical permeability rates have been tabulated in the Appendix of the 1 report. � d 0 J Wal *Mart — Clearwater (Highland) Store No. 97873, WNM Pinellas County, FL MACTEC Project 6513 -06 -0450 2.2 LABORATORY TESTING November 10, 2006 Report of Geotechnical Exploration The soil samples were transported to our laboratory and were classified by the Geotechnical Engineer using the USCS in general accordance with the ASTM Test Designation D -2488. In order to aid in classifying the soils and to help quantify and correlate engineering properties, laboratory index property and classification tests were performed on representative soil samples obtained from the borings. The laboratory testing included moisture content determinations, grain size ( -200 sieve) tests, Atterberg limits, Limerock Bearing Ratio (LBR) test, and Corrosion series (pH, resistivity, sulfates and chlorides). The results of these tests are presented on the Summary of Laboratory Test Results sheets in Appendix B. 3.0 SITE AND SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS 3.1 SITE CONDITIONS The project site is located at the Highland Square commercial center, in the northeast quadrant of the intersection of N. Highland Avenue and Greenlea Drive in Clearwater, Florida. We understand that a Wal *Mart Neighborhood Market is planned to replace the former Winn -Dixie store that currently occupies the site. The Winn Dixie building extends to the north into other retail facilities. The geotechnical study for the reconstruction of the adjacent retail facilities is not included in our scope of geotechnical services. The site had a gentle slope upwards from west to east. The asphalt parking lot surrounding the building had several minor surface depressions that, at the time of our field exploration, collected water. The asphalt pavements exhibited deterioration consisting of fatigue and thermal cracks, small potholes, and fuel spills. These types of damage were observed in various areas throughout the lots, particularly the east side being more noticeable. The asphalt deterioration was likely the result of the inadequate thickness of asphalt observed, harsh weather, heavy loads and the natural part of the aging process of a flexible thin layer pavement. Several patched asphalt areas were also noted. -5- Wal *Mart — Clearwater (Highland) Store No. 97873, WNM Pinellas County, FL MACTEC Project 6513 -06 -0450 November 10, 2006 Report of Geotechnical Exploration A stormwater retention pond was observed in the northeast corner of the project site. The depth to the bottom of the pond was approximately 2 feet. No standing water was observed during our visit. 3.2 SOIL SURVEY We have reviewed the Soil Survey of Pinellas County, Florida, published by the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) Soil Conservation Service (SCS). A reproduction of this map is presented in Appendix A. The USDA soil survey references three map units (As, Um & My) in the vicinity of the project site. Before development, the majority of the project area was most likely Myakka Sands (My). Table 3 presents a list of the predominant soil types listed above. Table 3: Summary of SCS May Units Pinellas County, Florida K��''I ..91,c�r• z"�'�Jq� e`�, Fh, }�.yp'�`�Y �� °��A �f'�7� s j.. a ,,yy55 .y�c � .F�. u$ 2 . ��. - � '�T 4. •e,• yt- .tr 5� ,� •� � -`J` .�< Y As Astatula fine sand From 40 to 60 inches for 6 to 12 SP -SM, SP months Um Urban. land — Myakka complex My Myakka fine sand Less than 10 inches for 1 to 4 SP -SM, SP months * This association consists of areas that have undergone extensive urban uevetopment. wenttrtcatton of tnese soils is not feasible. 3.3 USGS TOPOGRAPHY SURVEY The topographic survey map published by the United States Geological Survey was reviewed for ground surface features at the proposed project location (see Figure 4 in the Appendix of this report). Based on this review, the natural ground surface elevation sloped upward to the east direction from approximately +40 to +45 feet National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929 (NGVD). -6- Wal *Mart — Clearwater (Highland) Store No. 97873, WNM November 10, 2006 Pinellas County,FL Report of Geotechnical Exploration MACTEC Project 6513 -06 -0450 j 3.4 SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS 3.4.1 General An illustrated representation of the subsurface conditions encountered in the proposed building construction area is shown on the Generalized Subsurface Profiles (Figures 5) presented in Appendix A. The profiles and the soil conditions outlined below highlight the major subsurface stratification. The Soil Test Boring Records in Appendix A should be consulted for a detailed description of the 'i subsurface conditions encountered at each boring location. When reviewing the boring records and the subsurface profiles, it should be understood that soil conditions may vary between and away from boring locations. 3.4.2 Soils The borings first penetrated a veneer of asphalt and limerock base, underlain by sandy soils (SP) to depths ranging from 6 to 18 feet. The relative density of the sand strata was very loose to very dense, with typical standard penetration test resistances (N- values) ranging from 2 to 66 blows per foot. Clay (CL, CH) and indurated clay (CL) was then encountered beneath the sandy layers to the termination depth of the borings (10 -foot, 20 -foot, 25 -foot and 50 -foot borings): N values for the clayey soils ranged from 2 blows per foot to 50 blows for 3- inches of penetration. A clayey sand (SC) stratum was penetrated in several borings, just above or interbedded in the clay layer. Some of the clay samples in borings B -1, B -2 and B -4 contained trace of limestone fragments at depths below 18 feet. A layer of limestone /weathered limestone strata was penetrated in borings B -2 and B -10 at depths of 28 and 26 feet, respectively. N values of 81 blows per foot and 50 blows for 2 inches of penetration were recorded. A no- recovery zone was penetrated in boring B -1 at a depth of 30 feet. An N value of 50 blows for 0 inches (refusal material) was recorded indicating the layer is probably a limestone formation. ' 3.4.3 Ground Water The depth to ground water was measured at the majority of the boring locations at the time of drilling. The depth to ground water was measured after a period of 24 hours, only on those locations where it was suitable and pedestrian traffic was limited. Several of the stores at the commercial center were still in operation and pedestrian safety would be at risk, if boreholes were allowed to remain open for Wal *Mart Clearwater (Highland) Store No. 97873, WNM Pinellas County, FL MACTEC Project 6513 -06 -0450 November 10, 2006 Report of Ceotechnical Exploration the 24 hour period. The ground water table was generally encountered at depths ranging from 1.5 feet to about 4.5 feet below the existing ground surface. It should be noted that ground water levels tend to fluctuate during periods of prolonged drought, and extended rainfall and may be affected by man -made influences. In addition, a seasonal effect may also occur during which higher ground water levels are normally recorded during rainy seasons. 3.4.4 Estimated Seasonal High Ground Water Level Based on information obtained from the USDA, construction activity, surface water runoff, and other site - specific factors and our experience in the area, we estimate that the seasonal high ground water level to be at a depth of 1.5 feet below existing grades, ±6 inches. -8- I 1i Wal *Mart — Clearwater (Highland) Store No. 97873, WNM November 10, 2006 Pinellas County, FL Report of Ceotechnical Exploration ' MACTEC Project 6513 -06 -0450 4.0 EVALUATION �. 4.1 SETTLEMENT POTENTIAL Shallow foundations are the most economical foundation type for this site. We have compared .the field and laboratory test data obtained in this exploration with our experience with similar structures and empirical relationships for shallow foundation bearing and settlement. Provided that the recommended subgrade preparation operations are properly performed, the total settlements of isolated columns and wall footings should not exceed 3/a inch, with differential settlements on the order of 50 percent of the total settlements. Differential settlements between adjacent columns or along the length of a continuous wall footing of these magnitudes are usually considered tolerable for the anticipated construction. The tolerance of the proposed structures to the predicted total and differential settlements should be confirmed by the Structural Engineer. 4.2 SOIL CORROSION POTENTIAL Two samples were selected for pH, sulfate and chloride content, and electrical resistivity in order to assess their corrosion potential and electrical grounding characteristics. The soils were obtained in the upper approximately three feet of the soil profile. The results of these tests are presented in Appendix B. We have reviewed the Florida Department of Transportation Structures Design Guidelines (2000) for environmental corrosion classification. This document indicates that the tested soils range from "slightly aggressive" for concrete and "highly aggressive" for steel. From past local practice in ' Florida within the natural or fine sandy soils, buried ferrous metals do corrode; however, buried conventional concrete (Type I cement) historically has not developed significant corrosion Iproblems. Therefore, we believe that concrete. will have a longer service life. 4.3 SEISMIC CONSIDERATIONS ' Since the site exists within Zone 0 with respect to earthquake risk according to the Seismic Zone Map of the United States (1997 Uniform Building Code) and significant seismic activity has not ' been recorded in the area, no detailed geotechnical field or laboratory dynamic testing or seismic evaluation was performed. Zone 0 refers to areas having the lowest probability of seismic activity.. � 9 Wal *Mart — Clearwater (Highland) Store No. 97873, WNM November 10, 2006 Pinellas County,FL Report of Geotechnical Exploration .i MACTEC Project 6513 -06 -0450 Based on Table 16-J of the UBC, the soils at this site generally corresponds to Soil Profile Type Sp ' ( "Stiff Soil ,Profile "). The sands are considered susceptible to liquefaction in the event of an earthquake; however, the probability of seismic activity at this site is extremely low. 4.4 SINKHOLE CONSIDERATIONS Florida is underlain by limestone. The soils above the limestone are referred to as "overburden ". These overburden soils consist of sands, silts and clays. Limestone is predominantly composed of calcium carbonate. Calcium carbonate will dissolve in slightly acidic ground water. Over geologic time (thousands of years) this solution of calcium carbonate results in a series of cavities in the limestone formation. When the size of the cavity near the surface of the limestone exceeds the capacity of the overburden to bridge over the cavity, or when sandy soils are directly in contact with the cavity, the lower portion of the overburden falls into the cavity. The collapse progresses upward through the overburden until it reaches the ground surface and forms a depression or "sinkhole ". Depending on the nature of the overburden as well as the groundwater conditions, the upward migration of the void through the overburden may take minutes to many years. Sites with a thin overburden tend to have relatively rapid new sinkhole development. The size of the sinkhole is generally proportional to the overburden thickness. When the overburden soils directly above the limestone are clay, the frequency of sinkholes is i reduced. At this site, the deeper borings encountered a clay layer, therefore, the potential for raveling and subsequent sinkhole development is lower than other sites in the general area. Mapping of this portion of Pinellas County by the former Sinkhole Research Institute indicates a relatively low sinkhole frequency in the vicinity if the site. It is believed that if sinkhole activity is currently occurring, indications of soil raveling would have been encountered, such as surficial depressions and drilling fluid losses within the surficial soils. 4.5 SOIL SUBSIDENCE CONDITIONS IThis site is not located on soils that are prone to subsidence, therefore, no special design provisions are needed for under slab MEP systems or utility connections. -10- 1i Wal *Mart — Clearwater (Highland) Store No. 97873, WNM November 10, 2006 Pinellas County, FL Report of Geotechnical Exploration MACTEC Project 6513 -06 -0450 5.0 RECOMMENDATIONS FOR SITE PREPARATION AND FOUNDATION DESIGN 5.1 BASIS FOR RECOMMENDATIONS The following recommendations are based upon the previously presented project information and structural conditions along with the data obtained in this exploration. The field and laboratory data has been compared with previous performances of structure's bearing on soils similar to those encountered at this site. If the structural information is incorrect or if the location of the structure is changed, please contact us so that our recommendations can be reviewed. The assessment of site environmental conditions or the presence of pollutants in the soil, rock or ground water of the site is beyond the proposed scope of this geotechnical exploration. 5.2 SITE PREPARATION Site preparation should include the following elements: - Demolition, Clearing and Stripping - Proofrolling.of Exposed Soils - Structural Filling and Backfilling, 5.2.1 Demolition, Clearing and Stripping Existing pavements (concrete, asphalt and base) and vegetation should be stripped and removed from the construction area for a distance of at least 10 feet beyond the exterior building limits and from all areas to be paved. The asphalt and base materials should be pulverized and stockpiled for use as 1 stabilization under the new pavement. Pulverized concrete from the existing structure may also be used for stabilization, provided it is free from debris and reinforcing steel and has a maximum particle size less than 2 inches. All existing utilities and debris should be identified and removed. Utilities left in place could provide a conduit for raveling of bearing soils. -11- i l� Wal *Mart — Clearwater (Highland) Store No. 97873, WNM November 10, 2006 Pinellas County, FL Report of Geotechnical Exploration MACTEC Project 6513 -06 -0450 5.2.2 Proofrolling of Exposed Surface Soils Following stripping, the exposed subgrade within the proposed construction area should be proof rolled using a large vibratory roller. The roller should have a total operating static weight of at least 10 tons and a drum diameter of at least 5 feet. Both the building and paved areas should be proof rolled. Densities equivalent to at least 95 percent of the Modified Proctor maximum dry density (ASTM D- 1557) should be uniformly obtained to a depth of at least 12 inches below the compacted surface. -A moisture content within 2 percentage points of the optimum indicated by the Modified Proctor Test (ASTM D -1557) is recommended prior to compaction of the existing ground. Regardless of the degree of compaction achieved, a minimum of 10 complete coverages should be made in the building and pavement areas with the proofroller in order to help increase the density and improve the uniformity of the underlying soils. The roller coverages should be divided evenly into two perpendicular directions. Depending on the reaction of the soil to the proofrolling, some selected undercutting and replacement with compacted fill may be needed. Any areas that rut or deflect excessively during the proofrolling process should be removed and replaced with acceptable,_ compacted structural fill ' soils. We recommend that a qualified geotechnical engineer or engineering technician working under the direction of a geotechnical engineer witness the proofrolling operations. The site should be graded to avoid ponding of water in excavations (especially footing excavations) or on the ground surface. In general, concrete should be placed inr footings the day they are excavated. ' 5.2.3 Structural Filling and Backfllin g Structural fill, as required, may be placed in lifts not exceeding 12 inches in loose thickness. When the soils are relatively clean sand a vibratory roller should be used for compaction. Each lift should be thoroughly compacted with the appropriate roller until densities equivalent to at least 95 percent of the Modified Proctor maximum dry density are uniformly obtained. A moisture content within 2 percentage points of the optimum indicated by the Modified Proctor Test (ASTM D -1557) is. I -12- Wal *Mart — Clearwater (Highland) Store No. 97873, WNM November 10, 2006 Pinellas County, FL Report of Geotechnical Exploration MACTEC Project 6513 -06- 0450 recommended prior to compaction of the fill. Structural fill should consist of an inorganic, non- plastic, granular soil containing less than 12 percent material passing the No. 200 mesh sieve (relatively clean sand with a Unified Soil Classification of SP, SP -SC, or SP -SM). The upper foot of subgrade in the building and the pavement areas should be compacted to at least 98% of the Modified Proctor Maximum Dry Density (ASTM D- 1557). 5.3 SHALLOW FOUNDATION DESIGN After the recommended site preparation, we consider the building site acceptable for support of the proposed building on a shallow foundation system. Individual column footings and continuous wall footings may bear on compacted acceptable existing soils .or compacted structural fill soils. Column footings may be designed using an allowable gross soil bearing pressure of 2,500 psf. Continuous strip footings may also be designed using an allowable gross bearing pressure of 2,500 psf. Footings should bear at least 12 inches below the finished exterior grade in order to provide confinement for the bearing soils. Interior footings may bear at nominal depths below the floor slab. Minimum footing widths of 18 and 24 inches are recommended for continuous and individual footings, ' respectively, even though the allowable bearing pressure may not be fully developed in all cases. A density equivalent to at least 95 percent of the Modified Proctor maximum dry density (ASTM D- 1557) should be achieved in the footing bearing level soils. A coefficient of sliding friction value of 0.3 may be used in the design of footings subjected to inclined loads. 5.4 FLOOR SLAB DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION 1 It is expected that the floor slab will be supported on compacted structural fill. The floor slab subgrade soils should be compacted to a minimum dry density equal to 98 percent of the Modified Proctor maximum dry density to a depth of at least 12 inches. Structural fill placed below the uppermost 12 inches beneath the floor slab may be compacted to a 95 percent compaction criteria. Based upon the soil conditions encountered at the site, the planned fill placement, and the recommended site preparation operations . presented in this report, the modulus of vertical subgrade reaction (k) for the slab bearing soils is expected to be on the order of 180 pounds per square inch per inch of vertical deflection (pci), at the recommended structural fill compaction criteria. This exceeds the required minimum value of 150 pci. -13- i 1 Ll 1 Wal *Mart — Clearwater (Highland) Store No. 97873, WNM November 10, 2006 Pinellas County, FL Report of Geotechnical Exploration MACTEC Project 6513 -06 -0450 The 2004 Florida Building Code requires: Where installed beneath the slab, dampproofing shall consist of not less than 6 -mil [0.006 inch; (0.152 mm)] polyethylene with joints lapped not less than 6 inches (152 mm), or other approved methods or materials. Although 2004 Florida Building Code only requires a 6 -mil thickness, the Wal -Mart Geotechnical Investigation Specifications and Report Requirements recommend a minimum of 15 -mil polyethylene sheeting be used. Therefore, it is recommended that the floor slab bearing soils be covered by a lapped polyethylene sheeting of minimum 15 -mil thickness. The floor slab should be appropriately jointed to reduce the potential for cracking, and to allow for some differential movement between different sections of the slab. 5.5 EARTH PRESSURE PARAMETERS FOR RETAINING WALL DESIGN Retaining walls are planned to provide grade separation on the site. Table 5 presents recommended lateral earth pressure parameters for use in retaining wall design. As noted in the table, the earth pressure coefficient values represent ultimate conditions. Since the deflection necessary to mobilize the ultimate passive resistance may be more than can be tolerated, an appropriate factor of safety should be applied for design. The tabulated parameters assume adequate drainage is provided behind the wall to help prevent the build -up of excess hydrostatic pressures. Table 5: Recommended Earth Pressure Parameters Notes: a - Wall Friction Wall Ratio: Assumed smooth, formed concrete against granular soil. b - All earth pressure coefficient values are unfactored, ultimate values. c - Level backfill condition assumed. Passive earth pressure coefficients for sloping backfill should be appropriately adjusted. d - At -rest earth pressure coefficient was determined using the Jaky Formula: Ko — 1 -sin �. e - These materials do not exhibit appreciable cohesion. -14- Fine SAND (SP), slightly silty fine Damp: l 10 slightly clayey yey fine SAND (SP fi ne Saturated: 120 0 30t 0.6 0.339 0.59 2.59 SAND (SP -SC) Buoyant: 58' (Structural Fill Soils)` Notes: a - Wall Friction Wall Ratio: Assumed smooth, formed concrete against granular soil. b - All earth pressure coefficient values are unfactored, ultimate values. c - Level backfill condition assumed. Passive earth pressure coefficients for sloping backfill should be appropriately adjusted. d - At -rest earth pressure coefficient was determined using the Jaky Formula: Ko — 1 -sin �. e - These materials do not exhibit appreciable cohesion. -14- ii Wal 'Mart — Clearwater (Highland) Store No. 97873, WNM November 10, 2006 Pinellas County,FL Report of Geotechnical Exploration ' MACTEC Project 6513 -06 -0450 f- Friction angle for fill materials based upon a compacted density equivalent to 95 percent of the Modified Proctor maximum dry density (ASTM D -1557) for relatively clean sands (SP, SP -SM, SP -SC Unified classification). g - Equivalent Fluid Pressure = Unit Weight x Earth Pressure Coefficient I 5.6 GENERAL CONSTRUCTION MONITORING AND TESTING GUIDELINES The majority of the upper soils should be acceptable for use as structural fill. We have performed one LBR/laboratory moisture - density relationship tests of near surface existing soils in the pond area that may be used for structural fill. During construction, additional testing of existing soils will be needed. A representative number of in -place field density tests should be performed in the compacted existing soils and in each lift of structural fill or backfill to confirm that the required degree of compaction has been obtained. In -place density tests should also be performed at representative locations in the bearing level soils. We recommend that at least one density test be performed for every 5,000 square feet of compacted existing soils, subgrade, and in each lift of compacted fill or backfill. In addition, we recommend that at least one density test be performed for every 100 square feet of spread footing bearing area, and for every 50�lineal feet of continuous footing. 5.7 PAVEMENT RECOMMENDATIONS 5.7.1 Subgrade The new pavement subgrade should be no lower than the existing pavement subgrade, unless underdrains are used to lower the groundwater level. i The fill soils should be acceptable for construction and support of a limerock or crushed concrete flexible pavement section after proper site and subgrade preparation as described herein. The existing pavement section should be free of debris before pulverizing to a maximum particle size of 2 inches, then stockpiled for blending with the upper 12 inches of pavement subgrade. We recommend that the pavement subgrade be compacted to a minimum depth of 12 inches to at least 98 percent of the Modified Proctor maximum dry density (ASTM D- 1557). A subgrade with an LBR . > -40 is recommended for heavy duty pavements. ' -15- Wal *Mart — Clearwater (Highland) Store No. 97873, WNM November 10, 2006 Pinellas County,FL Report of Geotechnieal Exploration j MACTEC Project 6513 -06 -0450 Any fill utilized to elevate the pavement areas to subgrade elevation should consist of reasonably clean fine sands (inorganic, non - plastic sands containing less than 12 percent, by weight, of fines). Fill in the pavement area within 12 inches of the pavement base should be uniformly compacted to a minimum density of 98 percent of the soil's Modified Proctor maximum dry density (ASTM D- 1557), deeper fill should be compacted to at least 95 percent of ASTM D -1557. In heavy duty pavement I areas, onsite material will require Type B stabilization to increase the LBR to a minimum of 40. It is recommended that laboratory compaction and LBR tests be performed on the proposed structural fill materials to confirm that these soils can achieve the desired LBR values in the heavy duty pavement areas. Where subgrade stabilization is necessary, -it is recommended it be performed using Type B stabilization, as specified by the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) "Standard Specifications for Road and Bridge Construction," 2000 Edition, Section 160. Traffic should not be allowed on the subgrade before the base is placed to avoid rutting. 5.7.2 Base Course A limerock or crushed concrete base material may be used for this project. Limerock base material does not perform satisfactorily if the ground -water level is within 18 inches of the bottom of the pavement base. We recommend the base be at least 7 inches thick. Limerock base or crushed concrete material should meet FDOT requirements, including compaction to 95 percent of its maximum dry density as determined by the.Modifed Proctor Test (ASTM D -1557) and a minimum Limerock Bearing Ratio (LBR) of 100 at 95 percent compaction. 5.73 Asphaltic Concrete The asphaltic concrete structural course should consist of Type S -I (typical section) or S -III (overlay) asphaltic concrete material. The asphaltic concrete should meet standard FDOT material requirements and placement procedures as outlined in the 2000 Edition of the FDOT Standard Specifications for Road and Bridge Construction (This edition is prior to CQC /Superpave changes that have removed the Marshall -based mix designs). The asphalt should be compacted to a minimum of 96 percent of the laboratory unit weight when prepared in accordance with the Marshall Method. Wal *Mart — Clearwater (Highland) Store No. 97873, WNM Pinellas County, FL MACTEC Project 6513 -06 -0450 November 10, 2006 Report of Geotechnical Exploration Our pavement recommendations are based on the following design guidelines provided by Wal *Mart: Neighborhood Market Standard Duty Pavement: - A design life of 20 years, based on a Total Equivalent 18 kips axle load applications per day of 15 (109,500 ESALs }; - Design Reliability = 85 percent at an overall standard deviation of 0.45 for flexible pavements and 0.35 for rigid. pavements; - Initial Serviceability = 4.2; Terminal Serviceability = 2.0; - Minimum Asphalt thickness = 3 inches - Minimum concrete thickness = 5 inches Neighborhood Market Heavy Duty Pavement: - A design life of 20 years, based on a Total Equivalent 18 kips axle load applications per day of 29 1211,700 ESALs ); - Design Reliability = 85 percent at an overall standard deviation of 0.45 for flexible pavements and 0.35 for rigid pavements; - Initial Serviceability = 4.2; Terminal Serviceability = 2.0; - Minimum asphalt thickness = 4 inches - Minimum concrete thickness = 6 inches The following pavement sections are based upon our experience with similar facilities in the area. A copy of our pavement calculations is included in Appendix C. * For Standard Duty pavement, the subgrade need not be stabilized. 5.7.4 Rigid Concrete Pavement As an alternate to the above flexible pavement design, a rigid concrete pavement design could be used. It is recommended that the concrete pavement incorporate the following design criteria: • Minimum concrete modulus of rupture of 500 psi at 28 days. • Minimum concrete elastic modulus of 3,500,000 psi at 28 days. • Effective modulus of subgrade reaction of at least. 200 pci. -17- - _ Pavement Section Component Recommended Thickness (in) Standard Duty*, As halt 3.0 Base 7.0 Heavy Duty Asphalt 4.0 Base 7.0 Subgrade, LBR >_40 12.0 * For Standard Duty pavement, the subgrade need not be stabilized. 5.7.4 Rigid Concrete Pavement As an alternate to the above flexible pavement design, a rigid concrete pavement design could be used. It is recommended that the concrete pavement incorporate the following design criteria: • Minimum concrete modulus of rupture of 500 psi at 28 days. • Minimum concrete elastic modulus of 3,500,000 psi at 28 days. • Effective modulus of subgrade reaction of at least. 200 pci. -17- Wal *Mart — Clearwater (Highland) Store No. 97873, WNM November 10, 2006 Pinellas County, FL Report of Geotechnical Exploration MACTEC Project 6513 -06 -0450 • Load transfer coefficient of 3.2. • Drainage Coefficient of 0.9. The following pavement sections are based upon our experience with similar facilities in the area. A copy of our pavement calculations is included in Appendix C. r' —.v x� c1..,,r -�Y 7, .:�2,,,d �' -,,` '*5 s' ll$ t ' "g�r-�iw u_.i. `+"�'1..�+.�.n.....: �. - r'.. r��'t'i Y.Y: Pavement Section Component onent Recommended Thickness (in) Standard Duty Concrete 5.5 Heavy. Duty Concrete 7.0 The concrete properties noted above can typically be achieved in a 4,000 psi mix with #57 stone coarse aggregate having a slump on the order of 4 inches t/- 1 inch. We note that ACI recommends a minimum concrete strength of 4,000 psi for rigid pavement, which is slightly higher than the Wal*Mart standard of 3,500 psi. We recommend a thickness under tolerance of 1/4 inch and an over tolerance of 3/8 inch, with no more than 1/2 inch thickness variation within 10 feet. Proper jointing controls should be used. We recommend a maximum longitudinal to transverse pattern ratio of 1.2 to 1. We further recommend that the jointed section area ideally be on the order of 250 square feet but no, more than 400 square feet. Joints that intersect the edge should do so perpendicular to the edge. The joints should have a minimum cut depth of at least 1 inch or 1/5 of the slab thickness, whichever is greater. The joints should be cut within 8 hours of concrete placement. �. It is suggested that a rigid pavement be utilized in dumpster areas, including the areas in which dumpster trucks or other large vehicles load, backup and turn around. 5.8 EXCAVATION SLOPES Generally, for excavations less than 3 feet deep, the sides of the excavation can temporarily .stand with vertical cut slopes as a result of the apparent cohesion from soil moisture. For excavations greater than 3 feet deep, however, temporary side slopes in the sandy soils of 2:1 (H:V) or flatter should be maintained or the excavation properly braced or shored. The flatness of the slope will depend upon the type of groundwater control employed. -18- Wal *Mart — Clearwater (Highland) Store No. 97873, WNM November 10, 2006 Pinellas County, FL Report of Geolechnical Exploration MACTEC Project 6513 -06 -0450 Slopes for retention ponds should not exceed 3:1 (H:V) above the impounded water level and 4:1 (H:V) below the impounded water level. 5.9 ADDITIONAL EXPLORATION / REVIEW OF PLANS & SPECIFICATIONS We have performed all the field work necessary for the design of the proposed Neighborhood Market construction and associated paved areas. Once off -site improvements have been identified, additional field work may be required. This office plans to perform a general review of the foundation and earthwork plans and specifications prepared from the recommendations presented in this report. We will then suggest any modifications so that our recommendations are properly interpreted and implemented. Our report has been written in a guideline recommendation format and is not appropriate for use as a specification without in -part being reworded into a specification -type format. It is recommended that this report not be made a part of the contract documents; however, it should be made available to prospective contractors for information purposes. 1' ��; -19- j �r APPENDIX A • Site Vicinity Map (Fig. 1) • Field Exploration Plan (Fig. 2) • Soil Conservation Service Map (Fig. 3) - • USGS Site Vicinity Map (Fig. 4) • Key to Classifications and Symbols • Generalized Subsurface Profiles (Figs. 5) • Soil Test Boring Records �I i �I SITE LOCATION Source: Microsoft Streets & Trips 2005 Prepared by/ Date: SRF 1 1 /02/1 Checked by/ Date: 1'-jm 1i14 Wal *Mart — Clearwater (Highland) AMACTEC Store No. 97873, WNM . SITE VICINITY Pinellas County, Florida 6513 -06 -0450 Figure: I LBR-1 SOUTH DRIVE ---------- / ....... . ......... . .. ............ ........... 61.g 3 W. SHOP$ 10 11ralml 01 Tt M. Wao B-15 .;5 ... .. ....... . ....... .jGrm.tANE 011 wnwmutan Aa plwpom -B-16 i -4 - W. I.B48 ,ssE �rr,,:::� if ii �t F7- - - - - - OT-0. i i--- - - - - #-- --------- B-1Y • B-21 ........... ... . .......... I Source: Conceptual Site Plan #01, KHA, 9/20/06 Prepared by/ Date: SRF 11/C Checked by / Date: e �lr— I' Wal*Mart — Clearwater (Highland) 6 Store No. 97873, WNM MACTEC FIELD EXPLORATION . PLAN Pinellas County, Florida 16513-06-0450 Figure: 2 Up Up PC, ry WC A MY fi P ma 0 As Um Uc u� Um of rf U As p Ayr, b1yr,1 My '4,f r Y ma "U Ma m lik um Up P M Uk My U P r A �_ A" Q. •\ As Mik MA Ub 10 ma j. h Ub .2ft" tt, rpm r Up 6PI", P Up um Y IF— MR T.O.- U SITE LOCATION Prepared by Date: SRF 11 06 Source: USDA "Soil Survey of Pinellas County, Florida" Checked by/Date: C-ir' 1111y Wal*Mart — Clearwater (Highland) USDA VICINITY MAP Store No. 97873, WNM MAC T E C Pinellas County, Florida 6513-06-0450 Figure: 3 I SITE LOCATION USGS Quadrangle Map, Clearwater Florida, 1974 Source: Photorevised 1987 Prepared by / Date: SRF 11/02/06 / Checked by/ Date: CA's LI/ el Wal *Mart — Clearwater (Highland) MAC T E C USGS VICINITY MAP Store No. 97873, WNM Pinellas County, Florida 6513 -06 -0450 Figure: 4 ®.1 ---11( 2 -3-4 232 2 -34 2 - }5 1 -/ -3 2 -2 -5 7.7 -5 611 -15 - :'.- 9 -11 -12 4-7 -12 6 -11 -15 2 -2d 2 -24 4-5-5 :; :. 15 - CL tN=T)- _. -..... IN =It ---..... (N_T).....--- Irv= el-.....� (N= 4)..- ...... jN _. �1...... -.. N= ,�......SP N- 261......... . -•: N= -T31.- .._... - = 19J._..._.. .- .. = 261....._ -. (14=61— . - -... (N= 6)..- ...... = 101 ............. .... ...... ..... 1� CL CL- L CL 2 -1 -3 1 -2-4 `�' _ 9 -9-14 C�- 4 -6-12 C�- 10 -9-11 }5-9 2 - }3 SC 2d -5 � 1 -2 -3 2 -2 -3 94-7 2 -2 -3 5-7 -12 4 -}6 20 ........ .......... (N=om......... .(N=e1........ - N= 23)........ N ='16)- -- - - - - -- = Y01........ N= 1d)..._.... (N= 61 ...... - (N= 9) ... ..._ -. (N= 5) ......... Vt 5)_......CL _(N= .TI....... -. (N =51 ........ N= -191......... (N= 9)....................... BORING BORING BORING BORING BORING BORING BORING CL SC ' - TERMINATED TERMINATED TERMINATED TERMINATED TERMINATED TERMINATED TERMINATED 8.8-t0 5016 at 20.5 ft. at 20.5 ft. at 20.5 ft. at 20.5 ft. at 20.5 ft: at 20.5 ft_ at 20.5 ft. , -1_1 SC 1 -1-3 CL 624,2 4 -3-5 CL 7 -34 :. ................................................................................................. ............................... .. ................. .. 25 .- ......... N =181 ......CL (N= �......... .(N =-4) N.= e6)........ (N =8)......... (N.= 7) ..... .................. BORING BORING BORING BORING Ls TERMINATED TERMINATED TERMINATED TERMINATED solo 1-40 4,_5012 at 25.5 ft. at 25.5 ft- at 25.5 ft. at 25.5 ft. ................. ......................... .... .. ..... .............................. .... ............. ... ........... ........................ . .. ............................... LS BORING TERMINATED ,_,3zo 7.22.22 at 30.5 ft- AN35 ... 33)._.. CL N=4 4r' ......................................-........ ....................- ....... - -_ --- .- .- - - - - -- -- -• - - -- .- _ - - - - -_ - -----...--------.-.-.........-_..--..-........_.....................--.-.-........................-............................................. ............................... .................. - - -- -135 1� THE SOIL PROFILE SHOWN IS BASED ON INTERPOLATION OF CONDITIONS AT WIDELY SPACED BORINGS AND REASONABLE ENGINEERING JUDGEMENT_ NO WARRANTYIS REVISIONS B -1 B -2 OR 1MPUE0 Dates B -3 Project lame: Wal -Mart Highland flHACTEC Project Nv. X513 -06 -0450 Figure No. 5.A ATE B-4 B -5 Drawn by SRF B-6 B -7 B-8 B -9 B -10 B -11 B -12 B -13 B -14 12/12/2006 10/10/2006 10/12/2006 10/10/2006 10/10/2006 10/12/2006 10/12/2006 10/12/2006 10/12/2006 10/12/2006 10/13/2006 10/11/2006 • 10/11/2006 10/10/2006 0 ....... ASPHAL' 4SPHAL AcSPHAL - ''1SPHAt 101 ... ASPHAL "ASPHAL' ASPHAL- - - -ASPHAL ASPHAL -ASPHAL • •ASPHAL ASPHAL ASPHAL BAS 14 f 2SE . BAS N BASE-:--,-* BAS BAS B BASE BASE ':::. 6 7 3) N BASE- - �7 BAS }t °•9 3 z -5 s -9-11 - SP SS-6 5-6 -10 N=7) N - 20) SP .,- r7 �/ ., SP Nc18) SP :- N =161 z -za 1 -2d SP :. 14 SP .'. 2 -2 -3 1 -za SP 4- 40 -sas 1 -t -1 4.5T 'A 4 -s 6 1 -1 -2 SP 32� .: z -tJL za -st CJ .... .............. .: :_;. (N= Q)..__. - - -- - (N= .e1- ....:.. .: -_: -• (N'2)........ : -:. (N=s)--- - - -. -. ., -•. :'. = 101........ ..::,: ...._... -.... (N =21........ N =,t.,.1......... .. (N= 91........_ _ „)........ -(N=- 3) "'----- -- (N =dJ ........ (N =yl ....._... ._ .. (N.= 7)....- ..- .- ........ SP SP SP . SP 1 -1 -3 6-7-8 1 -2-8 -30 -34 SP 7-66 1 -2541 33-3 i -3-3 _ 4d-6 2.2 -5 2 -3d 2 -2 -3 4 -5-5 (N =4) N =15) N =10) N =64) N =12) N =66) (N =6) (N =61 N =10) (N =7) - (N =7) (N =5) pm 1 N =10) - 9-7 -7 ,:. - 5-8 -11 2 -3-5 6-5-6 34 -5 2 -1316 _ ". 5 -11 -15 24-6 _ 44 -7 SP 2.5.5 2.610 11-64 34L CL 4 -5-7 c14) - . - - .. • • :. -- N =19) - - - - • • . - _ _: (14-8) - . _ - . - _ N= IT)......5 -..- jN= y1.- ...... N= 291........ - :. = 261........ N= 10).._.. -SP N= 111........ = 10)......5 N =16)......._ N= 101........ N= 'idl.. ....... N =12J ............ ..... SC CL CL ' ®.1 ---11( 2 -3-4 232 2 -34 2 - }5 1 -/ -3 2 -2 -5 7.7 -5 611 -15 - :'.- 9 -11 -12 4-7 -12 6 -11 -15 2 -2d 2 -24 4-5-5 :; :. 15 - CL tN=T)- _. -..... IN =It ---..... (N_T).....--- Irv= el-.....� (N= 4)..- ...... jN _. �1...... -.. N= ,�......SP N- 261......... . -•: N= -T31.- .._... - = 19J._..._.. .- .. = 261....._ -. (14=61— . - -... (N= 6)..- ...... = 101 ............. .... ...... ..... 1� CL CL- L CL 2 -1 -3 1 -2-4 `�' _ 9 -9-14 C�- 4 -6-12 C�- 10 -9-11 }5-9 2 - }3 SC 2d -5 � 1 -2 -3 2 -2 -3 94-7 2 -2 -3 5-7 -12 4 -}6 20 ........ .......... (N=om......... .(N=e1........ - N= 23)........ N ='16)- -- - - - - -- = Y01........ N= 1d)..._.... (N= 61 ...... - (N= 9) ... ..._ -. (N= 5) ......... Vt 5)_......CL _(N= .TI....... -. (N =51 ........ N= -191......... (N= 9)....................... BORING BORING BORING BORING BORING BORING BORING CL SC ' - TERMINATED TERMINATED TERMINATED TERMINATED TERMINATED TERMINATED TERMINATED 8.8-t0 5016 at 20.5 ft. at 20.5 ft. at 20.5 ft. at 20.5 ft. at 20.5 ft: at 20.5 ft_ at 20.5 ft. , -1_1 SC 1 -1-3 CL 624,2 4 -3-5 CL 7 -34 :. ................................................................................................. ............................... .. ................. .. 25 .- ......... N =181 ......CL (N= �......... .(N =-4) N.= e6)........ (N =8)......... (N.= 7) ..... .................. BORING BORING BORING BORING Ls TERMINATED TERMINATED TERMINATED TERMINATED solo 1-40 4,_5012 at 25.5 ft. at 25.5 ft- at 25.5 ft. at 25.5 ft. ................. ......................... .... .. ..... .............................. .... ............. ... ........... ........................ . .. ............................... LS BORING TERMINATED ,_,3zo 7.22.22 at 30.5 ft- AN35 ... 33)._.. CL N=4 4r' ......................................-........ ....................- ....... - -_ --- .- .- - - - - -- -- -• - - -- .- _ - - - - -_ - -----...--------.-.-.........-_..--..-........_.....................--.-.-........................-............................................. ............................... .................. - - -- -135 1� THE SOIL PROFILE SHOWN IS BASED ON INTERPOLATION OF CONDITIONS AT WIDELY SPACED BORINGS AND REASONABLE ENGINEERING JUDGEMENT_ NO WARRANTYIS REVISIONS EXPRESSED Names OR 1MPUE0 Dates SUBSURFACE PROFILE Project lame: Wal -Mart Highland flHACTEC Project Nv. X513 -06 -0450 Figure No. 5.A ATE BY DESCRIPTION Drawn by SRF 11113/06 Checked �bMACTE� roved b THE SO11 PROFILF SHOWN IS SASM ON INTFRPOLATION OF CONDITIONS AT WIDELY SPACED BORINGS B -22 B -23 B -15 6-16 B -17 B -18 B -19 B -20 B -21 DESCRIPTION .. ASPHAL 10/17/2006 10/17/2006 10/11/2006 10/17/2006 10/12/2006 10/17/2006 10/11/2006 0 ....... ASPHALT- . . .... ............................... ------- ...ASPHAL BASE ..........ASPHAL BASE .'-'.-' BASE ................. BASE ..........ASPHAL ............. ... ....... ASPHALT- ... _................ BASE ...... ......._...... BASE ......................................... BASE .. .... ...................... ... ......... ....... ...................... BASE . .................................. BASE ............. ....................... . ................... _ ...................... .._..... ..........._.. 3-8 BASE BASE 5-6 S13 ' (N =11) v (N =11) 1 ................ .................... ..._............... . __.................. .................... .................... _..._.............. ... 'L .. ..... ........... :: .:.:. ._...._ -- ............ 2 -2 -3 .(N =5) :.-. -.: ............_......... - ::_ -:. 7 -R7- ............... _ .. _._............... - _ _ ............ d 56 .. ..._....... .... .. ... : 5 9.9 SP SP - (N =14) - - (N =111 - (N =11 ............ .:._ :: _ ...................... '.: �,: S-1P15 ........ :': 34.7 ---------------- ::. _ q-3 h ...... :................ ...... ....... 7 ' N-251 - (N =11) = (N 81 ............ ................... ..................... ....................... ......................................... SP 3-15-28 4-6-9 15.9 _ - (N = 43) ' -. 44.4 - 2 -2 -2 SP _.......... 1-0-0 .................... 2 -3-4 .... ....._. __...... 1 -2.3 ............._..._.. 1 -1 -1 ....._...... _._..._.........---------- .. 2 -2 -2 BORING BORING BORING (N =6) .... TERMINATED ---------- TERMINATED— ------ (N=4) - -- - -- - - - -- - - -- 11 - at 10.5 ft_ (N=0) at 10.5 ft. _ (N =7) - (N =5) (N =2) (N =4'. SP r SP SP -' SP SP :; 7 .................. '., :__ .1.1.1.._.............. _, ::. .i.t- ?.........._...... '..-:: .1.2.p...... -. .......... :....., .t_1.2....... .......... _:.. :. ..t, ?.5....... ...... ... .q.1,3 - ...... ......... .4.14. (N =2) (N =3) (N =4) - (N =3) (N =7) (N =4) (N =7) 8 .................. ..........._......_.. ._................... ..._..........._... ... ....__.._...._.__.... ._............_... _.. - .. _. _............._.._ ..... CL 9 ................... .......... ' ... ...._.............. --- ......--- ....... .................... - -- ---- - - - - -- ...... ..... 1 -2 -3 2 -24 3-5-7 139 - B -14 -30 65-13 34-7 (N, =5) - - (N =6) (N =12) - (N =12) - (N =44) - (N =21) (N =11) 10 .._........ -• -- .. ............ . . . .. ...._............._ ................_ ................. BORING BORING BORING BORING BORING BORING BORING 11 -- --- ------- TERMINATED--- - - - - -- TERMINATED --- - - - - -- TERMINATED--- - - - - -- TERMINATED— '•-- TERMINATE: D--- ----•-- TERMINATED -- .... TERMINATED at 10.5 ft. at 10.5 ft_ at 10.5 ft: at 10.5 ft. at 10.5 ft. at 10.5 ft. at10.5ft_ THE SO11 PROFILF SHOWN IS SASM ON INTFRPOLATION OF CONDITIONS AT WIDELY SPACED BORINGS B -22 B -23 B -24 B -25 A TE 10/17/2006 10/1312006 10/13/2006 10/1312006 DESCRIPTION .. ASPHAL SRF _ .......... P .... ASPHAL7 ........... ASPHAL A . ed by ............ "FRO I- . . .... ............................... 0 BASE BASE BASE BASE ............. .................... ... _................ ...... ......._...... ......................................... ............. .. .... ...................... ... ......... ....... ...................... . .................................. ....... ............. ....................... . ................... _ ...................... .._..... ..........._.. ................. 3 V v 44-6 (N =10) ; 2 -2-V (N =3) 2 -2 -3 .(N =5) SP : SP SP SP ............ .:._ :: _ ...................... '.: �,: S-1P15 ........ ............ 34.7 ---------------- ::. _ q-3 h ...... :................ ...... ....... 7 ' N-251 - (N =11) = (N 81 ............ ................... ..................... ....................... ......................................... 3-15-28 4-6-9 15.9 _ - (N = 43) ' -. (N = 151 - (N = 14) _.......... .................... _ .... ....._. __...... ............._..._.. ....._...... _._..._.........---------- .. BORING BORING BORING BORING ...... TERMINATED .... .... TERMINATED ---------- TERMINATED— ------ *TERMINATED ........ '------ - -- - -- - - - -- - - -- 11 - at 10.5 ft_ at 10.5 ft. at 10.5 ft. at. 10.5 ft. AND REASONABLE ENGINEERING JUDGEMENT. NO WARRANTY REVISIONS IS EXPRESSED Names OR IMPUED. bates A TE SUBSURFACE PROFILE Project Name: Wal -Mart Highland MACTEC Project No..�513 -06 -0450 Figure No. 53 RATE, By! DESCRIPTION Drawn b SRF 11/13/06 Checked b A . ed by D E P T H (ft0 'i i 5 10 i ' IS 1i 20 �i i 25 ' 30 0 35 ,I — 0 v 1 U Q 40 a ° 45 z 0 u 0 J F 50 0 ' N U F- U � 55 SOIL CLASSIFICATION L SAMPLES PLC /. NM( LL�(/e) I p E T T P N -COUNT o o v = N — AND REMARKS SEE KEY SYMBOL SHEET FOR EXPLANATION OF SYMBOLS AND ABBREVIATIONS BELOW. E G E N D A FINES ( %) * ORGANIC ( %) • SPT (bpf) 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 1 h SPT SPT 3 -8 (N = 12) 3 -2 -5 (N — 7) Limer3-8-4 k base Loose to medium dense tan to brown fine SAND (SP) SPT 2 -2 -2 (1,1= 4) 5 =: SPT 1-1 -3 (N=4) SpT 9-7 -7 (N = 14) 10 Firm green CLAY (CL) SPT (N 2-3-4 ) 15 Very loose to medium dense grayish green clayey fine SAND (SC) SPT 2 -1 -3 (N = 4) 20 SPT 8 -8 -10 (N =18) 25' No Recovery SPT 50 /0 30 Hard green CLAY (CL) with trace of limestone SPT 11 -13 -20 (N = 33) 35 SPT 12 -16-21 (N = 37) `� Very hard green indurated CLAY (CL) with trace of limestone SPT 15 -23-45 (N = 68) 45 SPT 9 -18 -50/5 0 BORING TERMINATED 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 DRILLER. R. Cartasco EQUIPMENT: CME Power Drill Rig METHOD: Rotary Wash with Bentonite Mud -ASTM D-1586 ' HOLE DIA._ 2 15116 inches REMARKS: THIS RECORD IS A REASONABLE INTERPRETATION. OF SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS.AT THE EXPLORATION - LOCATION. SUBSURFACE CONDITIONSAT OTHER, LOCATIONS AND A OTHER TIMES MAY DWFER- T . I INTERFACES BEWEEN STRATA ARE APPROXIMATE TRANSITIONS BETWEEN STRATA MAY BE GRADUAL.. r'. ;La ��'a�✓' � .�' -�� r °�B ©RI)`iG�RECORD PROJECT: Wal -Mart Highland LOCATION: Clearwater, FL BORING NO.: B -I DRILLED: December 12, 2006 PAGE 1 OF I PROJ. NO.: .. 65I3- 06-0450 CHECKED.BY: Awl MACTEG D E P H (o) SOIL CL.ASSIFTCATION AND REMARKS SEE KEY SYMBOL SHEET FOR EXPLANATION OF SYMBOLS AND ABBREVIATIONS BELOW- L E G N E D SAMPLES PL ( %) NM A ( %) v - -v ♦ FINES ( %) ♦ ORGANIC ( %) • SPT (bpf) 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 J D N T T P E N -COUNT o :o o " N 'R Asphalt AU 61-imerock base Loose to medittm dense brown fine SAND (SP) — 5 = SPT 1 -2A (N = 6) 5 . =. SPT 6-7 -8 (N = 15) 10 ` SPT 5-8 -11 (N = 19) 10 ' Firm green CLAY (CL) 15 SPT X 2 -3-2 (I,1 = 5) 15 20 SPT 1 -2-4 (N = 6) 20 Very hard green indurated CLAY (CL) with trace of limestone . 25 SPT X 50/6 5 Very hard light green weathered LIMESTONE (LS) 30 SPT 50 -41-40 (N=81) 30 Hard green indurated CLAY (CL) with trace of limestone 35 SPT (N =44) 35 Very hard grayish green indurated CLAY (CL) 40 SPT 11-18-50 (N = 68) 40 45 SPT 50/3 5 Very hard light green CLAY(CL) with limestone and chert fragments 50 SPT 12 -9 -50/4 0 BORING TERMINATED DRILLER: D. Teslicko EQUIPMENT: CME Power Drill Ric METHOD: Rotary Wash with Benionite Mud, ASTM D -1587 60' LE DIA -: 215/16 inches THIS RECORD IS A REASONABLE'INTERPRETATION OF SUBSURFACE COND3TION$.AT THE. EXPLORATION .-LOCATION. SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS AT OTHER . ; LOCATIONS AND. AT OTHER TIMES MAY:DIFFER INTERFACES BEWEEAI STRAT- XARE`A0110XIMATE. TRANSITIONS BETWEEN STRATA MAY BE 6RADUAL . MdlM:. Mu M-A PROJECT: - Wal -Mart Highland LOCATION: Clearwater, FL BORING NO.: B-2 DRILLED: October` 10, 2006 PAGE. I OF I PROD. NQ;:.... , 6Si 3-0G-0450 ..CHECKED BY:. .:.: At' TE SOIL CLASSIFICATION L SAMPLES PL ( %) NM ( %) LL ( %> 1 T N -COUNT AND REMARKS E ��° drilling G D A FINES ( %) ♦ ORGANIC ( %) E Y SEE KEY SYMBOL SHEET FOR EXPLANATION OF N N P o o :o • SPT (bpO SYMBOLS AND ABBREVIATIONS BELOW. D T E r C4 A I0 ZO 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 As halt SPT 10-10 (N =.20) 6-9-11 Limerock base Very loose to medium dense brown fine SAND (SP) -: SPT (N = 20) SPT (N = 2) 5 SPT 1 -2 -8 (N = 10) Firm green CLAY (CL) SPT 2 -3 -5 (1,1= 8) 10 SPT -4 2-34 = 7) 15 Medium dense grayish green clayey fine SAND (SC) with silty sand SPT 9 -9 -14 (N = 23) 20 BORING TERMINATED 25 30 35 40 45 50 DRILLER: R. Canto EQUIPMENT: CME Power brill Rig METHOD: Rotary Wash with Bcntoniie Mud, ASTM D1588 HOLE DIA.: 215116 inches REMARKS: Caved at 4.5 feet (assumed water table), when rrteasumA 24 hrs after drilling TI-JiS RECORD IS A REASONABLE INTERPRETATION OF SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS AT THE EXPLORATION LOCATION. SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS AT OTHER LOCATIONS AND AT OTFIER TIMES MAY DIFFER. INTERFACES BEWEEN STRATA ARE APPROXIMATE. I TRANSITIONS BETWEEN :STRATA MAY BE GRADUAL 0 ' 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 BORING NO.: 13-3 D.RILLED:. October 12, 2006 PAGE I OF I PROD. NO,: 6513 -06 =0450 CHECKED BY: . E P T H ! (0 _l 5 ,I ,� 10 i '; IS i. I 20 25 i 30 35 F p U V ' 3 40 ' a J V h 0 ° 45 z o F- a u 0 J a 50 LU 1 J _ 0 u F- u a 55 SOIL CLASSIRCATION L SAMPLES %/o) NM ( %) LL ( %) cf I D N T T Y P N C OUNT °o 0 0 ° v AND REMARICS SEE KEY SYMBOL SHEET FOR EXPLANATION OF SYMBOLS AND ABBREVIATIONS BELOW. E G E N D ♦ FINES (%) ♦ ORGANIC ( %) • SPT (bpf) 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 1 As halt + : ;l : {`,•: :`•` :::•,. AU Limerock base Loose to very dense tan to brown fine SAND (SP) SPT 2 -2 -3 (N = 5) 5 '- SPT SPT 36 -30-34 (N = 64) 6-5-6 (N= 11) 10 firm to stiff green CLAY (CL) SPT 2 -3-5' (N = 8) 15. Very stiffgreen sandy CLAY (CL) with trace of limestone Z—SPT 4-6-12 18). 20 BORING TERMINATED 25 30 35 40 45 50 DRILLER: ' D. Teslicko ' EQUIPMENT: CME Power 0ri11 Rig METHOD: Rotary Wadi with Benlonite Mud ASTT<1 D -1589 HOLE DIA.: 2 15/16 inches REMARKS: THIS RECORD'IS A•REASONABLE INTERPRETATION OF SUBSURFACE CONVMONS AT THE EXPLORATION LOCATION.: SUBSURFACE CONDIT)ONS AT OTHER .. LOCATIONS AND AT OTTtR TIMES MAY DIFFER. . INTERFACES BEWEEN STRATA ARE APPROXITMATI=_ TRANSI'IMONS BETWEEN STRATA TvtAY BE GRADUAL. 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 ..PROJECT:. Wal -Mart Highland LOCATION: Clearwater, FL BORING NO.: B4 DRILLED:' October I0, 2006 PAGE I OF t PRUJ: NO..; 6513 -06-0450. :.:CHECKED BY: M t i 1l D SOIL CLASSIFICATION } SAMPLES PL ( %) NM 0 D T N COUNT E P AND REMARKS E G ♦ FINES ( %) ♦ ORGANIC ( %) T E Y H SEE KEY SYMBOL SHEET FOR EXPLANATION OF N N P =o v 70 •SPT (bpf) (0) SYMBOLS AND ABBREVIATIONS BELOW. D T E N 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 1 Asphalt AU Limerock base Loose brown fine SAND (SP) 5 : SPT 1 -2 -8 (N= 10) 5 x 7-&6 6 Medium dense mixed brown/gray fine SAND (SP) - SPT (N =12) 34-5 Loose green clayey fine SAND (SP) _ 10 SPT (N = 9) 10 Soft green sandy CLAY (CL) with silty sand 15 SPT x 113 (N = 4) 15 Very stiff white indurated CLAY (CL) 20 SPT 10-9 -I 1. (N = 20) 20 BORING TERMINATED 25 25 30 30 35 35 40 40 45 7. 45 50 cc .- -- -- -- •- -., - .. .... .... .... ..... DRILLER-• D: Talicko EQUIPMENT_ CME Pawtr Drill Rig. METHOD: Rotary Wash with Bentonite Mud, ASTM D -1590 HOLE DIA.: 2.15/16 inches . REMARKS: THIS RECORD IS A REASONABLE INTERPRETATION OF SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS AT THE EXPLORATION LOCATION.-.SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS AT OTHER. ' LOCATIONS AND ATOTHER TIMES _MAY DIFFER.: (. INTERFACES BEWEEN STRATA ARE APPROXIMATE. 111ANSIT1014S BETWEEN STRATA MAY BE GRADUAL. PROJECT:. Wal -Mart Highland LOCATION- .Clearwater, FL BORING NO.: B=5 DRILLED: October. 10, 2006 ..PAGE 1 OF 1: 'PROJ, NO.: 6513- 05-0450.:.. CHEClKED BY MA TE 1 { SAMPLE'S D E SOIL CLASSIFICATION N -COUNT P AND REMARKS G D T ♦ FINES ( %) ♦ ORGANIC ( %) E H SEE KEY SYMBOL SHEET FOR EXPLANATION OF (ft) SYMBOLS AND ABBREVIATIONS BELOW. i 'o ° 0 1 halt I v Limerock base ' Very dense tan to brown fine SAND (SP) ' i S li 10 Medium dense clayey fine SAND (SC) Firm to stiff green CLAY (CL) 15 1� 44-40 -50/5 i 20 BORING TERMINATED Ij ! 25 I ' 30 SPT . ' 35 t F 0 All u (N = 66) 66) 22 -13 -16 1 ° a 40 J10 FE, 1� SPT (N = 29) 0 45 z. 0 1` u 0 J 4 50 . O U U Q � S5 DRILLER D: Testicko EQUIPMENT: CME Power Drill Rig ' METHOD: RotaryWashwith13monite Mud, ASTMD•1591 HOLE DIA: 215/16 inches REMARKS: Caved at'2:5 feet (assumed water table), when measured 24 hrs after driilliug ...THIS RECORD IS A REASONABLE INTERPRETATION OF.SI%URFACE CONDITIf)NS AT THE'EXI'LORATION LOCATION. SUBSURFACE'CONDITIONS AT OTHER LC+CA'hoNs AND AT. OTfIkk.TIMES'MAY. Dll` BR.. ' ... 1N` 7ERFACES .BEWEEN:S�RATA'AREAPPROXiMATE: .TRANSITIONS BM.EtN STRATA MAYBE GRADUAL. . L SAMPLE'S PL� %) I N -COUNT E G D T ♦ FINES ( %) ♦ ORGANIC ( %) E E Y D N E 'o ° 0 SPT (bPn I v r �+ 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 AU SPT 44-40 -50/5 SPT 31 -2 All (N = 66) 66) 22 -13 -16 J10 FE, SPT (N = 29) 3-5-9 (N =14) 30 50 [IIIII1.11. 0 10 20 30 40 50. 60 70. '80 90 100 PROJECT: Wal -Mart Highland LOCATION: Clearwater, FL' BORING NO:: B=pi DRILLED: October 12, 2006 PAGE i OF I •PROJ.NO:i . :'65.0,'06 =0450 CHE?CKEA.BY; . . E P T H (1) i I 5 I 10 i 15 20 ,i 25 ' 30 i� � 35 0 U v 3 40 a a 0 ° 45 z 0 F 6 C Q U F c. 50 O i U FW- U Q SOIL CLASSIFICATION L SAMPLES PL ('i /) NM (! ) LL ( %) I D T N -COUNT AND REMARKS E G 9° ♦ FINES ( %) ♦ ORGANIC ( %) W/o x E E Y SEE KEY SYMBOL SHEET FOR EXPLANATION OF N II P o :o o • SPT (bpQ SYMBOLS AND ABBREVIATIONS BELOW. D T E c -2 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 1 halt AU Limerock base Very loose to medium dense tan to brown fine SAND (SP) SPT 1.1.1 (IN = 2) 5 3 -3 -3 SPT (N = 6) SPT 5 -11 -15 (N = 26) 10 Firm to stiffgreen CLAY (CL) SPT 7 -7 -5 (N = 12) 15 SPT 2 -3 -3 (N = 6) 20 BORING TERMINATED 25 30 35 40 45 50 1 55 DRILLER: D. Teslicko EQUIPMENT: CMEPowerDrillRio METHOD: Rotary Wash with Bentonite Mud, ASTM D -1592 HOLE DL\.: 2 15/16 inches REMARKS: THIS RECORD IS A REASONABLE INTERPRETATION. OF SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS AT THE EXPLORATION LOCATION. SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS AT OTHER ' LOCATIONS AND AT OTHERTIMES MAY:DIFFER. INTERFACES BEWEEN STRATA ARE APPROXIMATE. TRANSITIONS BETWEEN STRATA MAY BE GRADUAL:. 0 10 26 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 PROJECT: Wal -Mart: Highland LOCATION: Clearwater, FL LED: October 12, 2006 7=—J. NO.: 6513 =06- 0450. W/o x BORING NO.: B-7 PAGE I OF i CHECKED BY: Vii, i mil. D E P ' T H (0 5 10 i i ,� IS 'i 20 25 30 c 35 r 0 v ao Ln v 3 40 45 z _o F Q. U O t- N 50 0 rJ u a 55 SOIL CLASSIFICATION L SAMPLES PT110) 1 D N T T P ly E N -COUNT p o ry AND REMARKS SEE KEY SYMBOL SHEET FOR EXPLANATION OF SYMBOLS AND ABBREVIATIONS BELOW. E G E N D A FINES ( %) ♦ ORGANIC ( %) • SPT (bpfl 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 1 As halt AU Limerock base Loose to mediwn dense tan to brown fine SAND (SP) SPT 45-6 (N =11) 5 SPT 13-3 (N = 6) SPT 2-4-6 (N=10) 10 Medium dense gray fine SAND (SP) SPT 6 11 -IS (N = 26) l5 Loose-grayish green clayey fine SAND (SC) with silty sand SPT 2-4-5 (11= 9) 20 BORING TERMINATED 25 30 35 40 45 50 DRILLER: D- Teslicko EQUIPMENT: CME Power Drill Rig METHOD:. Rotary Wash with Bentonite Mud, ASTM D -1593 ' HOLE DIA.: 2 15/16 etches REMARKS: THIS RECORD IS A. REASONABLE INTERPRETATIOIN OF SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS AT THE EXPLORATION LOCATION. SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS AT OTHER- LOCA VONS AND .AT OTHER TIMES MAY DIFFER, INTERFACES BEWEEN•STRATA ARE APPROXIMATE.. TRANSITIONS BETWEEN STRATA. MAY BE.GRADUAL. 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 .PROJECT: Wal -Mart Highland LOCATION: Clearwater, FL BORING NO:: B -8 DRILLED October 12; 2006 PAGE 1 OF I PROJ..:NO 6513 0x0450 :. CHECKED .BY:. 0,MmAP EC E P T H (0 1 5 I )0 15 I 20 25 i 30 35 Q U U a 40 a (7 d i 45 z 0 a V O H 0. 50 W U 6 55 ° SOIL CLASSIFICATION L SAMPLES PL,( %) NM ( % %) AND REMARI{ S E 1 N COUNT G ° Y ♦FINES ( %) ORGANIC (%) E SEE KEY SYMBOL SHEET FOR EXPLANATION OF N JE) P t/ SPT (bpi) SYMBOLS AND ABBREVIATIONS BELOW. D T E ry 10 20 .30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 1 As halt Limerock base AU Loose to medium dense tan to brown fine SAND (SP) 3 -4-5 SPT (N = 9) 5 SPT 4-4 -6 (N = 10) 4-4 -7 to 9 -11 -12 SPT (N = 23) 15 Firm green CLAY (CL) I -2 -3 BORING TERMINATED SPT (N — 5) 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 DRILLER: D. Teslicko EQUIPMENT: CME Power Drill Rig ' METHOD: Rotary Nash with Bentonite Mud ASTM D -1594 HOLE DIA.: 2 15/16 inches REMARKS: THIS RECORD IS A REASONABLE INTERPRETATION OF SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS AT THE EXPLORATION LOCATION- SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS AT'.OTHER LOCATIONS AND. AT OTHER TIMES MAY DIFFER. INTERFACES BEWEEN STRATA : AR APMOXIMATE- TRANSMONS BETWEEN STRATA MAY k8 GRADUAL. U lU N }U 4U -)U 6U 7U 25U YU IOU PROJECT: Wal-Mart Highland LOCATION: Clearwater, FL BORING NO:: B-9 DRILLED October 1.2, 2006 PAGE i OF I PRaJ,1V0.: .: 6513-06 -0450. CHECKED BY: MACTEC.... DRILLER: D. Teslicko EQUIPMENT: CME Power Drill Rig ' METHOD: Rotary Nash with Bentonite Mud ASTM D -1594 HOLE DIA.: 2 15/16 inches REMARKS: THIS RECORD IS A REASONABLE INTERPRETATION OF SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS AT THE EXPLORATION LOCATION- SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS AT'.OTHER LOCATIONS AND. AT OTHER TIMES MAY DIFFER. INTERFACES BEWEEN STRATA : AR APMOXIMATE- TRANSMONS BETWEEN STRATA MAY k8 GRADUAL. U lU N }U 4U -)U 6U 7U 25U YU IOU PROJECT: Wal-Mart Highland LOCATION: Clearwater, FL BORING NO:: B-9 DRILLED October 1.2, 2006 PAGE i OF I PRaJ,1V0.: .: 6513-06 -0450. CHECKED BY: MACTEC.... D E P T i H i tp) 5 ,i i ' 10 � 15 I 20 25 �I i 30 35 cn0 U 3 40 45 ' z 0 F Q U C. F— 50 a U F u a SOIL CLASSIFICATION L SAMPLES PL ( °i °) NM ( %) � BORING NO.: B -10: N -COUNT AND �"� E G ♦ FINES ( %) ♦ ORGANIC ( %) E AD SEE KEY SYMBOL SHEET FOR EXPLANATION OF N o 0 SPT (bpo SYMBOLS AND ABBREVIATIONS BELOW. D �, 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Loose to medium dense tan to brown fine SAND (SP) AU SPT 4-5 -6 (N = 1.1) 5 2 -2 -5 SPT (N =7) SPT 2 -5 -5 10 (N = 10) SPT 4-7 -12 (N = 19) 15 Very soft to firm green CLAY (CL) SPT 2 -2 -3 (N = 5) 20 SPT x 1 -1 -I (N = 2) 25 Very hard tan LIMESTONE (LS) SPT 4A1 -502 30 BORING TERMINATED 35 40 45 50 55 DRILLER D. Teslicko EQUIPMENT: CME Pores Dn71 Rig METHOD: Rotary Wash with Bentonite Mud. ASTM D -1595 HOLE DIA.: 2 151) 6 inehes REMARKS: TFIIS RECORD IS A REASONABLE INTERPRETATION OF SUBSURFACE :CONDITIONS.AT THE EXPLORATION .LOCAT104' SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS AT OTHER. .• LOCATIONS AND AT OTHER TIMES MAY DIFFER. . INTERFACES_BEWE04 _STRATA ARE APPROXIMATE.: TRANSMONS:BEi'WEEN STRATA MAY BE GRADUAL. 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 .PROJECT: Wal -Mart Highland LOCATION: Clearwater, FL BORING NO.: B -10: DRILLED: October 12, 2006 PAGE i OF I . PRO T. NO.:. 6513 -06 -0450 CHECKED,B�' f&MAPTE I r A 25 30 35 O E9 0- 40 45 U 1 0 50 0 U, F- U DRILLER- D. Tesficko EQUIPMENT: CME Pane, Drill Rig METHOD: Rotary Wash with Bmtonhe Mud..A.STM D -1596 HOLE DIA-: 2 15/16 inches REMARKS: THIS RECORD IS A REASONABLE INTERPRETATION OF SUBSURFACECONDITIONS AT THE EXPLORATION LOCATION. SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS AT OTHER LOCATIONS AND AT OTHER TIMES MAY DIFFER. INTERFACES BEWEEN STRATA ARE APPROXIMATE. TRANSITIONS BETWEEN STRATA MAY BE GRADUAL V IV 2u JU 4u 'lu bu /U N 9U luo PROJECT: Wal-Mart Highland LOCATION: Clearwater, FL BORING NO.: .41 DRILLED: October 13, 2006 PAGE f OF I :PROD. NO.:.._ .6513 -06 -0450. CIIECKE M ACTEC SOIL CLASSIFICATION L SAMPLES P Lg/.) NM 1 D E N T T T Y P E N-COUNT 10 '0 O C AND REMARKS SEE KEY SYMBOL SHEET FOR EXPLANATION OF SYMBOLS AND ABBREVIATIONS BELOW. E G E N D IN ♦ FES(%) ♦ORGANIC (%) 0 SPT (bpf) 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 I Asphalt AU 7 imerock base Mixed gray/brown fine SAND (SP) Very loose to medium dense tan to brown fine SAND (SP) —SPT (N = 3) 5 SPT 2-3 4 (N = 7) SPT 2 10 (N 16) 10 SPT X 6-11-15 (N 26) 15 — Firm green CLAY (CL) SPT 94-3 (N=7) 20 Very loose gray clayey fine SAND (SC) SPT (N 4) 25 BORING TERMINATED 30 35 40 45 50 DRILLER- D. Tesficko EQUIPMENT: CME Pane, Drill Rig METHOD: Rotary Wash with Bmtonhe Mud..A.STM D -1596 HOLE DIA-: 2 15/16 inches REMARKS: THIS RECORD IS A REASONABLE INTERPRETATION OF SUBSURFACECONDITIONS AT THE EXPLORATION LOCATION. SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS AT OTHER LOCATIONS AND AT OTHER TIMES MAY DIFFER. INTERFACES BEWEEN STRATA ARE APPROXIMATE. TRANSITIONS BETWEEN STRATA MAY BE GRADUAL V IV 2u JU 4u 'lu bu /U N 9U luo PROJECT: Wal-Mart Highland LOCATION: Clearwater, FL BORING NO.: .41 DRILLED: October 13, 2006 PAGE f OF I :PROD. NO.:.._ .6513 -06 -0450. CIIECKE M ACTEC D E P T H (0) I 5 i 10 15 i 20 I 25 i i� 30 0 35 i o U U 40 0 e ° 45 z o F- U 0 S0 o w U U Q SOIL CLASSIFICATION L SAMPLES PL0(°o) NMM(°o) I p T N -COUNT AND REMARKS E G A FINES ( %) ORGANIC (%) E E KEY SYMBOL SHEET FOR EXPLANATION OF N N P o o • SPT (bpf) SYMBOLS AND ABBREVIATIONS BELOW. D T E N 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 1 As halt _ SPT SPI 6-7 (N = 13) 5 -5-6 Limerock base Very loose to medium dense tan to brown fine SAND (SP) (N = 11) SPT x 3 -2 -2 5 (N = 4) 2 -2 -3 SPT (N =5) 11-64 Firm to stiff green CLAY (CL) SPT (N = 10) 10 SPT 2 -2-4 (N = 6) 15 SPT 2 -2 -3 (N = 5) 20 Very hard tan indurated CLAY (CL) with sill SPT 6 -24-42 (N = 66) 25 BORING TERMINATED 30 35 40 45 50 �5 DRILLER: R. Carrasco EQUIPMENT: CME Power Drill Rig METHOD: Rotary Wash with Bentonite Mud ASTM D -1597 HOLE DIA.: 215116 inches REMARKS: Caved at 4.6 feet (assumed water table), when measured 24 Ins after drilling THIS RECORD IS.A REASONABLE INTERPRETATION OF SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS. AT THE EXPLORATION LOCATION- SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS AT OTHER LOCATIONS AND AT OTHER TIMES MAY.DIFFER. INTERFACES BEWWEN STRATA ARE APPROXIMATE. TRANSITIONS BETWEEN- STRATA MAY BE GRADUAL. 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 PROJECT: Wal-Mart Highland LOCATION: Clearwater, :FL BORING NO.: B -12 DRILLED:. lOctober 11, 2006 PAGE 1 OF 1 PROD, NO . .6513-06-0450 CHECKED BY: MACTEC.. . D E P T H i (h 0 1 5 'j t 10 i 'I 15 20 �I 25 30 35 F 0 J m 1 3 40 N q 45 z 0 < U G H 50 rU, E � SS SOIL CLASSIFICATION L SAMPLES PLLI.) NM 1 T N- COUNT AND REMARKS E ° G D . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ♦ FINES ( %) ♦ ORGANIC ( %) E E Y SEE KEY SYMBOL SHEET FOR EXPLANATION OF N N P • SPT (bpt) SYMBOLS AND ABBREVIATIONS BELOW. D T E N �•`t 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 1 As halt SPT 6-7 (N = 13) 5 -8 -10 Limerock base V Medium dense to very loose tan to brown fine SAND (SP) SPT (N = 18) .: 2 -1 -2 SPT (1,1= 3) 5 Firm to stiff green CLAY (CL) S PT 3-5-6 (N=11) SPT 34-6 (N = 10) 10 SPT 2 -24 (N = 6) 15 Firm to very stiff light gray CLAY (CL) with silt SPT 5 -7 -12 (N = 19) 20 SPT 43 -5 (N = 8) 25 BORING TERMINATED 30 35 40 45 50 DRILLER:, R. Canauo EQUIPMENT: CMEPowerDrillRig METHOD: Rotary Wash with Bentonite Mud, ASTM D-1586 HOLEDIA.: 215 /16 inches REMARKS: . Caved at 1-5 feet (assumed water table), when measured 24 hrs after - dn7lmg THIS RECORD IS A REASONABLE INTERPRETATION:: OF SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS AT THE EXPLORATION - LOCATION. SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS AT OTHER LOCATIONS AND AT OTHER TIMES MAY DIFFER: INTERFACES. BEWEEN STRATA ARE APPROXIMATE. TRANSITIONS 131 WEENSTRATA. MAV,B:EGRADUA4 U 1U LU SU 4U >U W /U 8U 9U IUU PROJECT: Wal -Mart Highland LOCATION: Clearwater, FL BORING NO.: B-13 DRILLED: October 11,_ 2006. PAGE .I .OF 1 PROJ. NO.: 6513 -0Cr0450 .: CHECKED BY.: PM CTE'C . . . . . . . . . . . . . . i �l E P T H I i 5 10 IS �j 20 -1 25 �I 1 30 35 n U U 3 40 Q e ,6 ° 45 z o a U 0 f- a 50 ' O U m F- U Q 55 D SOIL CLASSIFICATION L SAMPLES P 0 0) NMe( %) %) AND REMARKS E 1 N cOUnrr G D T ♦ FINES ( %) ♦ ORGANIC ( %) E Y SEE KEY SYMBOL SHEET FOR EXPLANATION OF N N P = 'o � • SPT (bpi) SYMBOLS AND ABBREVIATIONS BELOW. D T O E 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 30 90 100 1 it 3-10 -9 Limercek base SPT (N = 19) Loose to medium dense tan to brown fine SAND (SP) 5_9-7 :- SPT (N = 16) 24-3 : SPT (N = 7) 5 Stiff grayish green sandy CLAY (CL) SPT 4-5 -5 (N = 10) 4-5 -7 SPT (N = 12) 10 Stiff grayish green sandy CLAY (CL) with sill 4 -5 -5 SPT (N = 10) 15 4-3-6 SPT X (N = 9) 20 Firm green indurated CLAY (CL) 7 -3 -4 BORING TERMINATED SPT (N = 7) 25 30 35 40 45 50 �I DRILLER: R. Camasco EQUIPMENT: CMIE Power Dal Rig METHOD: Rotary Wash with Bentonite Mud, ASTM DA 586 HOLE DIA_: 2 15A6 inches REMARKS: THIS RECORD IS A REASONABLE. INTERPRETATION OF SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS AT THE EXPLORATION. LOCATION. SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS AT OTHER LOCATIONS AND: AT OTHER TIMES MAY DIFFER- INTERFACES BEWEEN STRATAARE :APPROXIMATE- TRANSITIONS BETWEEN STRATAMAY.BE GRADUAL.. 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 PROJECT: Wal -Mart. Highland LOCATION: Clearwater, FL DRILLED:. October 10, 2006 PROD. N04..: 6513 -06-0450 BORING NO.: B -14 PAGE I OF I [ECKED. BY: 'Alm. A0 TEC �I DRILLER: R. Camasco EQUIPMENT: CMIE Power Dal Rig METHOD: Rotary Wash with Bentonite Mud, ASTM DA 586 HOLE DIA_: 2 15A6 inches REMARKS: THIS RECORD IS A REASONABLE. INTERPRETATION OF SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS AT THE EXPLORATION. LOCATION. SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS AT OTHER LOCATIONS AND: AT OTHER TIMES MAY DIFFER- INTERFACES BEWEEN STRATAARE :APPROXIMATE- TRANSITIONS BETWEEN STRATAMAY.BE GRADUAL.. 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 PROJECT: Wal -Mart. Highland LOCATION: Clearwater, FL DRILLED:. October 10, 2006 PROD. N04..: 6513 -06-0450 BORING NO.: B -14 PAGE I OF I [ECKED. BY: 'Alm. A0 TEC BORING NO.: B -14 PAGE I OF I [ECKED. BY: 'Alm. A0 TEC C v L F L D SOIL CLASSIFICATION L SAMPLES PL %) NMe( %) LL %) 1) T NcouNr E P AND REMARIC.S E G A FINES ( %) ♦ ORGANIC ( %) T E E Y H SEE KEY SYMBOL SHEET FOR EXPLANATION OF N N P o 0 0 • SPT (bpt) (�) SYMBOLS AND ABBREVIATIONS BELOW. D T E y c — N m 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 1 AsDhalt AU Limerock base Very loose to loose tan to brown fine SAND (SP) 5 -. —SPT 4-4-4 (N = 8) 5 '- SPT I 1 -1 (N = 2) 10 SPT 1�2 5 IN ) 10 BORING TERMINATED 15 IS 20 20 25 25 30 30 35 35 40 40 45 45 50 cc ' 50 DRILLER: R.Carrasco EQUIPMENT: CME PcwciE) i11 Rig METHOD: Rolary Wash with Banonite Mud, ASTM D-1586 HOLE DIA.: 215/16 inches REMARKS: THIS RECORD IS A REASONABLE INTERPRETAT)ON OF SUBSURFACE CQNDITIONS A7' TiW EXPLORA I.iuN LOCATION. SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS AT OTHER LOCATIONS AND-AT6ltMR TIMFSMAY.bIF1 ER f INTERFACES BEWEEN STRATA ARE APPROXIMATE. TRANSMoigS-Bl InFWEENST1tATA MAY BE GRADUAL V 1V LV JV YV Jv VV /V °V 7V 1VV PROJECT: Wal -Mart Highland LOCATION: Clearwater; FL BORING NO.: B -15 DRILLED:. October 17, 2006 PAGE 1 OF I PROD: NO.:' b513 -06 -0450 :...° ::CHECKED BY:. M AA .� liJ L Ec ACT :. D E P T 0 5 10 is 20 25 30 '2 — 35 m - 40 L? 9.- 45 0- P: u 0- N 0- u SOIL CLASSIFICATION AND REMARKS SEE KEY SYMBOL SHEET FOR EXPLANATION OF SYMBOLS AND ABBREVIATIONS BELOW L E G E N D SAMPLES PLP) NM (%) A FINES ( %) ORGANIC(%) 0 SPT (bpf) 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90.100 D E N T T Y P E N-COUNT 0 �0 I Asphalt BORING NO.: B-16. AU October 17, 2006 006 . PAGE .1 DIF f 65-0 6-0.45- CHECKED RY:,.. Limerock base Very loose to loose tan to brown fine SAND (SP) —SPT X 2-2-2 (N = 4) 5 SPT (N = 3) SPT 2-2 4 (N 6) 10 BORING TERMINATED 15 20 25 jo 35 40 .45 50 0 10 20 36 40 50 60 70 80 0 100 DRILLER: R. Carrasco EQUIPMENT` 04E Power Drim Rig METHOD: -Rotary Wash with Bcnton*-qc Mud, ASTM U;• 1586 HOLE DIA.: 2 151M inches REMARKS: 'THIS RECORD. 1S A REASONABLE INTERPRETATION 0FSUBSU.RfA.CE CONDITIONS AUNE EXPLORATION IVJN LOCATION". SUBSURFACE-CONDITIQNS AT OT!itR -ER DIFFER.: LOCATIONS AND AT - OTH TIMES MAY. D JMATE; INTERFACES STRATA ARE APPROX Zrjnwqi-tv.rwFiZN.4_ZF1RAT.A MAYBE GRADUAL PROJECT: Wal -Mart Higbiaid. 'LOCATION! Clearwater,. FL BORING NO.: B-16. I) RALLED: October 17, 2006 006 . PAGE .1 DIF f 65-0 6-0.45- CHECKED RY:,.. 'I U U D SOIL CLASSIFICATION L SAMPLES NM N -coUNT E E P AND REMARKS G D T ♦ FINES ( %) ♦ ORGANIC ( %) T E E Y H SEE KEY SYMBOL SHEET FOR EXPLANATION OF N IN P 10 0 SPT(bpf) SYMBOLS AND ABBREVIATIONS BELOW. D T E = 'R 10 20 30 40 50 6070 80 90 100 SPT 3-8 (N= ") - Wk base Very loose to medium dense tan to brown fine SAND (SP) SPT 7-7-7 (N = 14) 5 SPT x 1-0-0 (N 0) 5 1-2-2 SPT (N = 4) 3-5-7 Stiff green CLAY (CL) 10 — —SPT 10 BORING TERMINATED, 15 15 20 2 0 25 12 5 30 30 35 3 5 40 —40 45 45 50 50 DRILLER- R.0 .. sco EQUIPMENT: CNE Power Drill Rig METHOD: Rotary Wash with Bentonite MucL—ASTM D -1586 HOLE DLIL: 215/16 inches REMARKS: THIS RECORD IS A REASONABLE INTERPRETATION OF SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS AT THE. EXPLORATION LOCATION. SUBSURFACE CONDITIONSAT. OTII.Ek. LOCATIONS AND AT OTHER TIMES MAY DIFFER. 110WAIMS BE%YEEN. STRATA AREAPPROXIMATE JIMSMONS BETWEEN STRATA MAY BE GRADUAL. PROJECT: Wal-Mart Highland LOCATION: Clearwateri FL BORING NO.: B-17 DRILLED: October 11, 2006 PAGE 1. OF I PROD. NO.; .6513-06-0450 CHECKED BY MACTEC. ,: D E T 0 1 5 15 20 25 30 35 rri 3: — 40 45 2- U 0- 50 0 U L0 S011L CLASSIFICATION L SAMPLES PL 1.) NM D' E N T T Y P E N-COUNT 1 z 0 '0 AND REMARKS SEE KEY SYMBOL SHEET FOR EXPLANATION OF SYMBOLS AND ABBREVIATIONS BELOW. E G E N D A FINES ORGANIC (*/o) • SPT (bpo 10 20 30 40 -50 60 70 80 90 100 3 Astyhalt AU \5Limerock base Very loose to medium dense tan to brown fine SAND (SP) —SPT 2-34 (N = 7) 5 SPT (N = 3) _SPT 3 -3-9 (1,1 =12) to BORING TERMINATED 15 20 25 30 35 40 145 50 DRILLER: R. C—o EQUIPMENT: CI%4EPuwcr 'Drin Rig METHOD, Rotary Wash with Bcntonitc Mod, ASTMD-1586 HOLE DLA-.: 2 15/16 in.6cs REMARKS: Caved ai 5 fed (assurned water table), when mc&wred at time of drilling THIS RECORD IS A' REASONABLE INTERPRETATION 017'SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS AT THE EXPLORATION " LOCATION. --SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS AT OTHER LOCATIONS AND 'AT:OTHER-T1MES MAY DIFFER. -. IN ES BtWEEN STRATA ARE APPROXIMATE. TRANSITIONS BETWEEN STRATA. MAYBE GRADUAL 0 10 20 30 40 50 60' 70 80 90 100 PROJECT: Wal-Mart lEgbiand LOCATION: Clearwater, FL BORING NO.: B-18 DRILLED: October. jl, 2006 PAGE I OF 1 [PROJ. NO.: 6513=06-0450. CHECKED BY; MAGTEC DRILLER: . R_ Carmsco EQUIPMENT: CME Power Drill Rig METHOD: Rotary Wash with Bentonite Mud, ASTM. D -1586 HOLE DIA.: . 215/16 uxhet REMARKS THIS RECORD IS A REASONABLE INTERPRETATION: OF SUBSURFACE ,ONDITIONS.AT THE EXPLORATION LOCAT TI AT ]ON. SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS AT 0714ER I;OCAONS ,OTiIER T1MES MAa' i3IFFETt:.. .. ' INTERFACES AND BEWEEN STRATA ARE APPROXIMATE. TRANSITIONS BEP&TEN STRATA MAY BEGRADUAL SAMPLES L PROJECT: LOCATION: DRILLED:. PROJ. NO.: 1 N-COUN E E SOIL CLASSIFICATION T P AND REMARKS T P ' o :o H SEE KEY SYMBOL SHEET FOR EXPLANATION OF i ^� 2 (0) SYMBOLS AND ABBREVIATIONS BELOW. 5-6 (N= 11) 3 Asphalt SPT 4-5-6 Limerock base �I (N= 11) Loose to dense tan to brown fine SAND (SP) 5 SPT 10 1 -2 -5 BORING TERMINATED SPT 15 : ` SPT 8-14 -30 I (N = 44) 20 25 30 S 35 0 ai 3 40 u . 45 z 0 F u 0 h 6 50 Q 0 uVi u u Q, 55 DRILLER: . R_ Carmsco EQUIPMENT: CME Power Drill Rig METHOD: Rotary Wash with Bentonite Mud, ASTM. D -1586 HOLE DIA.: . 215/16 uxhet REMARKS THIS RECORD IS A REASONABLE INTERPRETATION: OF SUBSURFACE ,ONDITIONS.AT THE EXPLORATION LOCAT TI AT ]ON. SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS AT 0714ER I;OCAONS ,OTiIER T1MES MAa' i3IFFETt:.. .. ' INTERFACES AND BEWEEN STRATA ARE APPROXIMATE. TRANSITIONS BEP&TEN STRATA MAY BEGRADUAL PL /.) NMe( %) ♦FINES ( %) • ORGANIC (%) • SPT (bpl) 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 5 10 15 25 30 35 -1 �Uol 50 0 10. 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Wi��'��. -act' S F tSb�.�� O � �� Q��'s- n c �rs�. 6.°� F.-a:i'Y :`i .�.R.:�+: e'. ,� ,x`�''..i':.F >.. v . .. 6� SAMPLES L PROJECT: LOCATION: DRILLED:. PROJ. NO.: 1 N-COUN E G D T E E N P ' o :o D T E ^� 2 SPT 5-6 (N= 11) SPT 4-5-6 (N= 11) 1 -2 -3 SPT (N =5) 1 -2 -5 SPT (N =7) : ` SPT 8-14 -30 (N = 44) PL /.) NMe( %) ♦FINES ( %) • ORGANIC (%) • SPT (bpl) 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 5 10 15 25 30 35 -1 �Uol 50 0 10. 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Wi��'��. -act' S F tSb�.�� O � �� Q��'s- n c �rs�. 6.°� F.-a:i'Y :`i .�.R.:�+: e'. ,� ,x`�''..i':.F >.. v . .. 6� PROJECT: LOCATION: DRILLED:. PROJ. NO.: Wal -Mart Highland Clearwater, FI. BORING NO:: B -14 October 12, 2006 PAGE 1 OF I 6-5.11 =06 -0450 CHECKED BY: ..: . 11 -ACTEC :. t t 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 D E P T H (0' 5 10 IS 20 25 30 35 A U rm m U 3 40 a J c U h 0 .o 45 N 50 0 U F- 55 SOIL CLASSIFICATION L SAMPLES PLC °i NM ( %) LL�c°o) I D N T T Y P E N COUNT e 10 ° ,°, AND REMARK SEE KEY SYMBOL SHEET FOR EXPLANATION OF SYMBOLS AND ABBREVIATIONS BELOW. E G E N D ♦FINES ( %) ORGANIC (%) •SPT (bpQ 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 I halt AU 6Limerock base Very loose to medium dense tan to brown fine SAND (SP) SPT 1 -1 -1 (N = 2) 5 -: SPT (N = 4) SPT �j &21) 10 BORING TERMINATED 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 DRILLER: R. Carrasco EQUIPMENT: CME Powe Drill Rig METHOD: Rotary Wash with Bento'nile Mud, ASTM D4586 HOLE DIA'.: 2 15 /16'MOCS REMARKS: THIS RECORD IS A REASONABLE IN<ITERPRETATION OF SUBSURFACE CONDIT10N� ATT74t EJCPLORATIO]V LOCATION. SUBSURFACE,CQNDITIONS AT OTHER LOCATIONS AND A?' OTHER TIMES MAY DIFFER. INTERFACES BEWEEN STRATA-.ARE APPROMMATE. Tr?.AW4Z 6Xl1Z fkft%VPPN CTRATA.MAVR1=fR4n11A1'.- V IV LV JV 4V JV oV IV oV YV IVV �.✓s 7 I, �' aA.5x3c +t .S' X X ��!i • � .f.w'�i�tY.. � tai YyY •'.xv:- .iY. J 1.�: _ PROJECT: Wal -Mart Highland 'LOCATION: Clearwater, FL BORING NO.:. B-20 DRILLED: October 17, 2006 PAGE 1 Of 1 ;CHECKED. BY: M A.C- TE D E P T H 0 5 "i 1 10 15 20 `, I 25 30 35 L? 40 < 45 z 0- p < 0- so 0 LQ 55 S0H_ CLASSIFICATION L SAMPLES Pl, NM (%) LL (%) D E N T T Y p E I N COUNT 0 To 2 CIS In AND REMARKS SEE KEY SYMBOL SHEET FOR EXPLANATION OF SYMBOLS AND ABBREVIATIONS BELOW. ) E G E N D _44 — GD ♦ FINES ( %) ♦ ORGANIC ( %) SPT(bp0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 halt Ir SPT SPT 5-13 (N = 18) 5-9-9 (N = 18) \4Limerock base Very loose to medium dense brown fine SAND (SP) SPT SPT x 11 2-2-2 (N =4) 4-3-4 4-3A = 7) 5 . Firm to stiffgroen CLAY (CL) SlYT. 3A-7 (N If) 10 BORING TERMINATED 15 7 20 25 30 35 —40 45 50 9 10 10. 30 40 50 60 70 80 90.100 DRILLER :' R_ CarTasoo EQUIPMENT: CMEIowcrDfillRig METHOD: Rotary Wash With Bentonite Mud, AS7M D-1586 HOLE DLk: 2 15/16 inches REMARKS: THJS RECOkIJ IS AREASONABLE INTERPRETATION OF SUBSURFACE: CONDITIONS AT THE EXPLORATION LOCH 'hON.- .,S1UBURFACE CONDITIONS AT OTHER LOCATIONS. AND At 0THEk-Tt0,S MAY-DIt+tk. INTERFACE BEwEEN STRATA ARE APORO MATE. -" ` M TRANSONS-.O� MAY STRATA BE'GRADUAL D E P T H i; 10 15 20 25 30 35 LO 0- 3: — 40 o. 45 0- P < u 0 50 0 7 :2 — 55 DRILLER: R- C asm EQUIPMENT: emE Power bnmRig METHOD: Rotary Wash with Bentonite Mud, ASTM D -1586 HOLE DIA.: -2.15/16'i, h REMARKS: -niiS-RE't'Okb.:ISA.REASO-NABLEINTERPRETATION - OV-WOSURPACtCONDMON CONDITIONS :-,I:OCATION...- SUBSURFACE -CONDITIONS AT OTHER -',-,U)CAT1O14S*A9D At OTHER. TIMES MAY " - - . * ' ii4TEFFAtFSBk EENgTRATAAkE'APPROX TRANSITIONS BETWEEN STRATA MAY BE GRADUAL ., :0 IU ZU 30 40 50. 60 70 80 90 100 BORING NO.: 0-22*11 DRILLED: October 17, 2006 -PAGE. I OF 1. 1..MQJ.NO.- 651.3-06-0450.: CHECKED BY:.. SOIL CLASSIFICATION AND REMARKS SEE KEY SYMBOL SHEET FOR EXPLANATION OF SYMBOLS AND ABBREVIATIONS BELOW. L E G E N D SAMPLES PLP) N . M (j/.) LL V1.) 'c' — — ♦ FINES ORGANIC ( %) • SPT (bpi) 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 D E N T Y p E ITI N-COUNT 10 t� - -2 A 1 AU 5 10 IS 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 Dark to light brown fine SAND (SP) BORING TERMINATED DRILLER: R- C asm EQUIPMENT: emE Power bnmRig METHOD: Rotary Wash with Bentonite Mud, ASTM D -1586 HOLE DIA.: -2.15/16'i, h REMARKS: -niiS-RE't'Okb.:ISA.REASO-NABLEINTERPRETATION - OV-WOSURPACtCONDMON CONDITIONS :-,I:OCATION...- SUBSURFACE -CONDITIONS AT OTHER -',-,U)CAT1O14S*A9D At OTHER. TIMES MAY " - - . * ' ii4TEFFAtFSBk EENgTRATAAkE'APPROX TRANSITIONS BETWEEN STRATA MAY BE GRADUAL ., :0 IU ZU 30 40 50. 60 70 80 90 100 BORING NO.: 0-22*11 DRILLED: October 17, 2006 -PAGE. I OF 1. 1..MQJ.NO.- 651.3-06-0450.: CHECKED BY:.. I - D E P T H 0 5 10 15 20 r� 25 30 35 tri 40 `,r , V 45 Z O 0- 50 0 W - U 55 DRILLER: 'D. Temicko EQUIPMENT: CME Power Drill Rig METHOD: notary Nash with .Bcntonitc'Mud, ASTM D- 1586 HOLE DL4-: 2 15/16 inches REMARKS: THIS S RECORD IS A REASONABLE 191MRPRETATION OF SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS *AT THE ]EXPLORATION :LOCA-nO]4-.*' SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS A;r OTHER LOCATIONS AND AT OTHER TTMES* MAY 'DIFFER. INTERFACES B IEWtEN STRATA ARE APPROXIMATE. TR ANSMONS 130*0EN STRATA MAY BE GRADUAL:' 0 10 20 30 '40 50. 00. 70.80 90 100 PROJECT. SOIL CLASSIFICATION L SAMPLES P LZ.) NM D' E N T T Y P E N-COUNT PROD. NO::.:. AND REMARKS SEE KEY SYMBOL SHEET FOR EXPLANATION OF SYMBOLS AND ABBREVIATIONS BELOW. E G E N D A FINES(%) ♦ORGANIC (%) • SPT (bpo 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80* 90 100 '\2 1 It AU Vti= base Loose to dense tan to brown fine SAND (SP) —SPT 4-4-6 (N = 10) 5 SPT 5-10-15 (N = 25) \01 SPT 13-15-28 (N 43) 10 BORING TERMINATED Is 20 25 30 35 -7 40 45 50* DRILLER: 'D. Temicko EQUIPMENT: CME Power Drill Rig METHOD: notary Nash with .Bcntonitc'Mud, ASTM D- 1586 HOLE DL4-: 2 15/16 inches REMARKS: THIS S RECORD IS A REASONABLE 191MRPRETATION OF SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS *AT THE ]EXPLORATION :LOCA-nO]4-.*' SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS A;r OTHER LOCATIONS AND AT OTHER TTMES* MAY 'DIFFER. INTERFACES B IEWtEN STRATA ARE APPROXIMATE. TR ANSMONS 130*0EN STRATA MAY BE GRADUAL:' 0 10 20 30 '40 50. 00. 70.80 90 100 PROJECT. Wal=Mart Highland LOCATION Clearwiter, FL BORING NO;. B-23 DRILLED: October 13,2006 PAGE I OF 1. PROD. NO::.:. .6513=06-0450.. CHECKED BY. MACTEG' ..' D E P T 0 10 15 4 t i 20 25 30 ' ? 35 o 40 o' 45 z 0- U o- 50 '' 0 U W - F_ SOIL CLASSIFICATION AND REMARKS SEE KEY SYMBOL SHEET FOR EXPLANATION OF SYMBOLS AND ABBREVIATIONS BELOW. L E G E N D SAMPLES P L, nm – – ♦ FINES (%) ♦ ORGANIC ( %) • SPT (bpf) 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 f30 90 100 D' E N T T Y P E N-CO1UNT =, 0 ;b f -0 T .2 c DRILLED: October 13, 2006 -PAGE- I OF I AU -65Q706-0450:,-:.,.` '.CHECKED BY: - T'. . - -- Ec A A VI C A - �i=alt ..k base Very loose to medium dense brown fine SAND (SP) SPT 2-2-1 (N = 3) 5 SPT 34-7 (N=11) SPT (N 15 ) 10 BORING TERMINATED 20 25 30 35 40— 145 50 _j 0 10 '20 30 40 50 60 70 90 90 106 DRILLER: D. Tesficko EQUIPMENT: CME Power DO Rig METHOD: Rotary Wash with gmtonite Mud, ASTM D -1586 HOLE DIA.: 2 15/16 inches RE 4kRKS: THISRECORb IS A REASONABLE INTERPRETATION OF SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS AT THE EXPLORATION LOCATION. SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS AT OTHER: LOCATIONS AND ;AT OTHER TIMES MAY 6IFFEK' INTERFACES BEVEEN STRATA ARE APPROXIMATE. 'TRANSITIONS BETWEEN STRATA MAY BE GRADUAL IN. On, Er 0 ._PRO3.ECT: Wal -Mart Highland LOCATION: Clearwater, FL BORING NO.: B-24 DRILLED: October 13, 2006 -PAGE- I OF I �PRQ;. NO.: -65Q706-0450:,-:.,.` '.CHECKED BY: - T'. . - -- Ec A A VI C A D E P T H (01 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 F O u' cm m_ U 3 40 0 0 C? 45 z 0 < 0 `I— 50 1. ... 55 SOIL CLASSIFICATION AND REMARKS SEE KEY SYMBOL SHEET FOR EXPLANATION OF SYMBOLS AND ABBREVIATIONS BELOW. L E G E N D SAMPLES PL,�/) NM ( %_ ) 1 L� %) o �+� A FINES ( %) ORGANIC (%) 0 SPT (bpf) 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 1 p 1Ej T P Y N COUNT o ° 'o ° v A tjmnarked electrical cable encountered dining drilling AU L 9khall V9hall k base Loose to medium dense brown fine SAND (SP) SPT 2 -2 -3 (N = 5) 5 ;- SPT 1 -3-5 (N = 8) SPT 3-5 -9 (N = 14) 10 BORING TERMINATED 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 DRILLER D. Testicko EQUIPMENT: CME Power Drill Rig METHOD: Rotary Wash with Beotonite Mud ASTM D -1586 . HOLE DIa: 2 15116 inches REMARKS: tjmnarked electrical cable encountered dining drilling JMIIS RECORD 1S AREASONABLE INTTwRRRETATION OF SUBSURFACE CONDI710NS AT THE EXPLORATION LbcATTON.: AMSLJkkl b CONDITIONS AT OTHER LOCATIONS AND AT OTHER TIMES:MAY DIFFER. ' ! INTERFAC>r$;BEW18' ' T RATA ARE'APPRp)*ATE. ` iRANSTI7t)NS BEIIEEN.STRATA MAY BE.iGRADUAL. 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 PROJECT: WM- Mar(.HiAland LOCATION: ' ClearWater, FL . BORING.NO.: B-2S DRILLED: October 13, 2466 PAGE A .OF I .. PROD. NO.:. CHECKED $Y. , ...: . MAJOR DIVISIONS GROUP SYMBOLS TYPICAL NAMES Undisturbed Sample Boulders Auger Cuttings Median Coarse CLEAN o'er GW Well graded gavels, gavel ..sand mixtures, little or no fines. Split Spoon Sample P P P No Recovery GRAVELS GRAVELS (Little or no fines) e d GP poorly graded gravels or gave - sand mbar es, Rock Core Dilatometer More Man. of (_ •o .little or no. coarse fraction is LARGER than the GRAVELS o GM Silty gavels, gavel - sand - silt mixtures. _ Water Table at time of drilling Water Table after 24 hours COARSE No. 4 sieve size) WITH .FINES GRAINED SOILS (.Appreciable amount of fines) GC Clayey gavels, gravel -sand - clay mixnlres. {More than 5(P /n'of material is LARGER. CLEAN S W Well graded sands, gravelly sands, little or no fines. tliala.No. 200 sieve' SANDS SANDS �,: size) (Mole. than 50% of (1.•ittle or no tines) ;..0.� %; :- •:: S P Poorly graded sands or gavelly sands, little or coarse fraction is no fines. SMALLER dhan .dhe No. 4 Sieve Size) SANDS WiTH i ;; SM Silty sands, sand -silt mixtures FINES (Appreciable amount S C Clayey sands, sand- -clay mixtures. CORRELATION OF PENETRATION RESMANCE Of ) WTI RELATM DENSRY AND CONSISTENCY ML '"organics ilts and very tine sands, rock (lour, silty of SAND & GRAVEL SILT & CLAY Clayey me sands or clayey silts and w e, sl ght phstiaty. No. of Blows Relative Density No of Blows Consistency SILTS LD C.L Iorgnic lays low ictry' gravelly finds 0-4 Loose 0-2 Soft FINE u d limit S than 50 (Liia ) Ito lef (en lac lays, y silty y y 5-10 Loose 3-4 Soft GRAINED — OL Organic silts and organic silty clays of low l I - 30 Medium Dense 5 - 8 Firm SOILS = plasticity. 31= 50 Dense 9- 15 Stiff (More .than 50'/o .of MH inorganic silts. micaceous or diatomaceous fine Over 50 Ve Dense .16-30 Ve Stiff material is SMALLER than No. sandy or silty soils, elastic silts. Over 30 Hard 200 sieve size) Si.LTS AND CLAYS (Liquid limit GREATER than 50) CH Inorganic clays of high plasticity, fit claw OH Orgaluc.clays of n>edium to high plasticity,. LIMESTONE organic silts. No, of Blows Consistency HIGHLY ORGANIC SOILS PT s. Peat and other highly organic soil 10-20 Soft ` ='' 21-50 Medium LS Limestone 51 - 50/3" Hard LIMESTONE FORMATIONS. Greater than 50/3" Vea Hard -y WLS Weathered Limestone BOUNDARY CLASSIFICATIONS: Soils possessing characteristics of two groups are designated by combinations of group symbols. 0 SLLT OR CLAY SAND GRAVEL Cobbles Boulders Fine Median Coarse . Fine Come No.200 No.40 No.10 No.4 3/4" U.S. STANDARD SIEVE SiZE The Unified Soil Classification System, Corps of Engineers, lum No, 3 -357, Vol. 1, March, 1953 (.Revised April, 1960) 3" 12" U.S. Army Technical KEY TO SYMBOLS AND DESCRIPTIONS MACTEC \ l APPENDIX B • Summary of Laboratory Test Results • Report of Corrosion Properties Test Results Limerock Bearing Ratio (LBR) Test Results • Double Ring Infiltration (DRI) Test results • Borehole Permeability Test Results Boring No. Depth (ft) �j Percent Fiher than No. 200 Sieve (by weight) Organic Content . ( %) Atterberg Limits L L SUMMARY OF LABORATORY TEST RESULTS B -1 WM g • 10.4 STORE NO. 97873, WNM CLEARWATER (HIGHLAND) - PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA 9-10 MACTEC Project No. 6513 -06 -0450 Boring No. Depth (ft) Moisture .Content (%) Percent Fiher than No. 200 Sieve (by weight) Organic Content . ( %) Atterberg Limits L L PI B -1 1.5 -3 • 10.4 4.5 - - B -3 9-10 26.3 61.8 - 67 52 B -4 9-10 33.1 55.6 - 65 47 B -5 9-10 24.7 31.0 - - - B -11 4 -5.5 21.4 6.9 - - - B -12 6.5-8 25.3 1.1 - - - B -13 4 -5.5 23.9 3.1 - - - B -13 6.5-8 17.6 45.0 - 38 21 B -14 6.5-8 23.6 55.8 - 54 39 B -15 0.5 -4 4.4 2.7 - - - B -20 0.5-4 9.3 3.7 - - - B -21 6.5-8 22.2 58.5 - 53 37 B -24 3-4 5.7 2.4 - - - Boring. No. Depth Resistivity REPORT OF SOIL CORROSION PROPERTY TEST RESULTS Sulfate Content pH (ft) (ohm -cm) STORE NO. 97873, WNM (Ppm) CLEARWATER (HIGHLAND) PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA B -18 0.5 MACTEC Project No. 6513 -06 -0450 Boring. No. Depth Resistivity Chloride Content Sulfate Content pH (ft) (ohm -cm) (ppm) (Ppm) B -18 0.5 5,400 60 105.6 7.9 B -23 0.5 6,500 60 82.5 5.8 LIMEROCK BEARING RATIO (LBR) TEST RESULTS %W *MART® STORE NO. 97873, WNM CLEARWATER (HIGHLAND) PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA MACTEC Project No. 6513 -06 -0450 0 10 m J 4 2 1 L -- 7% 9% 11% 13% 15% MOISTURE CONTENT ( %) 17% n11V1EE Y -n V1t1N di AJJUUJA I LS Sample Number: LBR -I Location: N/P Soil Description: GRAY FINE SAND WITH TRACE OF ORGANICS Maximum L.B.R. Value = 47 Moisture - Density Relationship (Modified Proctor) r 110 CL J O 109 w LL 0 108 w 107 z 106 105 1- 7% 9% 11% 13% 15% MOISTURE CONTENT ( %) Max. Dry Density = 110 pcf Optimum Moisture = l I % 17% Respectfully Submitted 'i i Location: Field Rep: Date Performed: Test Depth: Procedures: Outer Ring Dia.: Inner Ring Dia.: Head: Test Duration: DOUBLE -RING INFILTRATION TEST RESULTS WAJm*MAUO STORE NO. 97873, WNM CLEARWATER (HIGHLAND) PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA MACTEC Project No. 6513 -06 -0450 DRI- I BC 10/17/2006 1.0 feet below ground surface ASTM D- 3385 -75 24 inches 12 inches 12 inches 4.0 hours Time Increment'(Minutes:Seconds) Infiltration Per Time Period (Inches) 15:00 0.75 15:00 0.5 15:00 0.5 15:00 0.5 30:00 0.75 30:00 0.75 30:00 0.5 30:00 0.5 30:00 0.5 30:00 0.5 Infiltration Rate: 1 inch per hour The water table was approximately 3.5 below existing grade at the time of testing. BOREHOLE PERMEABILITY TEST RESULTS WAL *MART® STORE NO. 97873, WNM CLEARWATER (HIGHLAND) PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA MACTEC Project No. 6513 -06 -0450 Test Method: Open Hole Test Method Field Rep: DT /DS Dates of Testing: 10/11/06 No factor of safety has been applied to these values. Ground Water Kh K� Boring Level at Time of Permeability- Permeability — No. Location Testing Horizontal Vertical (feet) (cm/sec) (cm/sec) B -13 Stormwater Vault 4.5 3.4 x 10 "4 2.3 x 10'4 No factor of safety has been applied to these values. I L PAVEMENT THICKNESS MEASUREMENTS STORE NO. 97873, WNM CLEARWATER (HIGHLAND) PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA MACTEC Project No. 6513 -06 -0450 Location (Boring No.) Asphalt Thickness (inches) Limerock Base Thickness (inches) B -1 1 5 B -2. 2 6 B -3 1 5 B -4 1 5 B -5 1 5 B -6 1 4 B -7 1.5 4.5 B -8 1 4 B -9 1 5 B -10 - - B -lI 1 7 B -12 1 5 B -13 1 4 B -14 1 3 B -15 1 5 B -16 1 5 B -17 1 5 B -18 3 5 B -19 3 3 B -20 1 6 B -21 1 4 B =22 1 6 B -23 2.5 3 B -24 .2 6 B -25 1 5 i� APPENDIX C • Geotechnical Investigation Fact Sheet • Foundation Design Criteria • Foundation Subsurface Preparation • Pavement Design Sketch (Fig. 6) • Pavement Calculations • Checklist 3 GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION FACT SHEET N Include this form in the Geotechnical Report as an Appendix. ' PROJECT LOCATION: Clearwater, FL, Store No. 97873 Engineer: Curtis J. Roos Phone #: 813- 289 -0750 i Geotechnical Engineering Co.: MACTEC Engineering and Consulting Inc. Report Date: 11/10/06 Ground Water Elevation: _Depth = 1.5 feet below grade Fill Soils Characteristics: (If encountered) Date Groundwater Measured: October, 2006 Maximum Liquid Limit: NP Topsoil /Stripping Depth: 2 inches (grass areas), Maximum Plasticity Index: NP (site is mostly aghalt paved). Undercut (If .Required): As directed by geotechnical engineer after proof rolling. 'I Specified Compaction: 95% ASTM D- 1557..98% ASTM D-1 557, in upper foot. 1 Standard Proctor Results: NA Moisture Content Range: ± 2% of optimum ! Recommended Compaction Control Tests: ' 1 Test for Each 5,000 Sq. Ft. each Lift (bldg. area) I Test for Each 5,000 Sq. Ft. each Lift (parking area) Structural Fill Maximum Lift Thickness 12 in. (Measured loose) Subgrade Design LBR value ? 15 standard -duty / 40 heavy -duty COMPONENT ASPHALT CONCRETE Standard Heavy Standard Heavy Subgrade (LBR > 20) 12 N/A 12 12 (98% ASTM D698) Stabilized Subgrade (LBR >_ 40) * 12* �i (98% ASTM D698) Base Material = Limerock 7 7 N/A N/A ' or Crushed Concrete Asphalt Base Course N/A N/A Leveling Binder Course N/A N/A Surface Course 3 inches 4 inches 5.5 inches 7 inches * Pulverized existing pavement with maximum particle size of 2 inches. NOTE:. This'inforrnation shall not be used separately from the.geotechnical report. . t? \GEOTECH \2006\Projects \6513 -06 -0450 Walmart Highland \GEOTECHNICAL.INVESTIGATION FACT. SHEET .d ' 1 of 3 '1 I 1i I FOUNDATION DESIGN CRITERIA Include this form in the .Geotechnical Report as an Appendix. PROJECT LOCATION: Clearwater (Highland Avenue), FL, Store No. 97873 Engineer: Curtis J. Roos _ Phone #: 813- 289 -0750 Geotechnical Engineering Co.: MACTEC Engineering and Consulting Inc. Report Date:11 /10/06 Foundation type: Shallow individual spread footings and continuous wall footings AIlowable bearing pressure: 2,500 psf (continuous): 2,500 psf (column) Factor of Safety: 2.5 min Minimum footing dimensions: Individual: 24 inches Continuous: 18 inches Minimum footing embedment: Exterior: 12 inches Frost depth: N/A Maximum foundation settlements: Total: 3/4 inch Differential: ''V2 inch Slab: Potential vertical rise: N/A Capillary Break (not a vapor barrier) describe: Interior: 12 inches Subgrade reaction modulus: 180 psi/in Method obtained: 98% ASTM D -1557 Active Equivalent Fluid Pressures 43 pounds per.square foot Passive Equivalent Fluid Pressures 275 pounds per square foot Perimeter Drains (describe): Building: N/A Retaining Walls: Toe Drain Cement Type: Type I Portland Retaining Wall: At rest pressure: 55 pounds per square foot per foot depth Coefficient of friction: 0.30 COMMENTS: FOUNDATION SUBSURFACE PREPARATION WAL * MART Store No. 97873 Clearwater (Highland), FL 11/10/2006 UNLESS SPECIFICALLY INDICATED OTHERWISE IN THE DRAWINGS AND /OR SPECIFICATIONS, THE LIMITS OF THIS SUBSURFACE PREPARATION ARE CONSIDERED TO BE THAT PORTION OF THE SITE DIRECTLY BENEATH AND 5 FEET BEYOND THE BUILDING AND APPURTENANCES. APPURTENANCES ARE THOSE ITEMS ATTACHED TO THE BUILDING PROPER (REFER TO DRAWING SHEET SP1), TYPICALLY INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE BUILDING SIDEWALKS, GARDEN CENTER, PORCHES, RAMPS, STOOPS, TRUCK WELLS/DOCKS, CONCRETE APRONS AT THE AUTOMOTIVE CENTER, COMPACTOR PAD, ETC. THE SUBBASE AND THE VAPOR BARRIER, WHERE REQUIRED, DO NOT EXTEND BEYOND THE LIMITS OF THE ACTUAL BUILDING AND THE APPURTENANCES. ESTABLISH THE FINAL SUBGRADE ELEVATION AT A MINIMUM OF 10 INCHES ( + / -) BELOW THE FINISHED FLOOR CONCRETE ELEVATION WHEN USING A 4 INCH SLAB OR 11.5 INCHES BELOW THE FINISHED FLOOR CONCRETE ELEVATION WHEN USING A 5.5 INCH SLAB, AS THE BUILDING CONTRACTOR IS REQUIRED TO INSTALL 6 INCHES OF CRUSHED LIMEROCK THE VAPOR RETARDER TO THE ELEVATION OF THE BOTTOM OF THE CONCRETE SLAB. THE CONTRACTOR 1S RESPONSIBLE FOR OBTAINING ACCURATE MEASUREMENTS FOR ALL CUT AND FILL DEPTHS REQUIRED. THE FLOOR SLAB BEARING SOILS IN THE RETAIL AREA SHALL BE COVERED BY A LAPPED POLYETHYLENE SHEETING MEMBRANE OF AT LEAST 15 -MIL THICKNESS, IN ORDER TO REDUCE THE POTENTIAL FOR FLOOR DAMPNESS WHICH CAN AFFECT THE PERFORMANCE OF GLUED TILE AND CARPET. EXISTING FOUNDATIONS, SLABS, PAVEMENTS, AND BELOW -GRADE STRUCTURES SHALL BE REMOVED FROM THE BUILDING AREA. REMOVE SURFACE VEGETATION, TOPSOIL, ROOT SYSTEMS, ORGANIC MATERIAL, EXISTING FILL, AND SOFT OR OTHERWISE UNSUITABLE MATERIAL FROM THE BUILDING AREA. PROOFROLL EXPOSED SUBGRADE. REMOVE AND ' REPLACE UNSUITABLE AREAS WITH SUITABLE MATERIAL. SUBGRADE MATERIAL SHALL BE FREE OF ORGANIC AND OTHER DELETERIOUS MATERIALS AND SHALL MEET THE FOLLOWING REQUIREMENTS: SAND, SLIGHTLY SILTY SAND, SLIGHTY CLAYEY SAND (SP, SP -SM, SP -SC — UNIFIED CLASSIFICATION) Organic Content: < 4% SUBGRADE MATERIAL SHALL BE PLACED IN LOOSE LIFTS NOT EXCEEDING 12 INCHES IN THICKNESS AND COMPACTED TO AT LEAST 98 PERCENT OF THE MODIFIED PROCTOR MAXIMUM DRY DENSITY (ASTM D -1557) AT A MOISTURE CONTENT WITHIN 2 PERCENT BELOW TO 2 PERCENT ABOVE THE OPTIMUM. THE FOUNDATION SYSTEM SHALL BE ISOLATED SPREAD FOOTINGS AT COLUMNS AND CONTINUOUS SPREAD FOOTINGS AT WALLS. THIS FOUNDATION SUBSURFACE PREPARATION DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A COMPLETE SITE WORK SPECIFICATION_ IN CASE OF CONFLICT, INFORMATION COVERED IN THIS PREPARATION SHALL TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER THE WAL -MART SPECIFICATIONS.. REFER TO THE SPECIFICATIONS FOR SPECIFIC INFORMATION NOT COVERED IN THIS PREPARATION_ THIS INFORMATION WAS TAKEN FROM A GEOTECHNICAL REPORT PREPARED BY SONIA FLORENCE AND CURTIS ROOS, DATED 11/10/06 (GEOTECHNICAL REPORT IS FOR INFORMATION ONLY AND IS NOT A CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION). An E, -Mail address for the.Geotechnical Engineer: ciroosa,,mactec:eom (A final review of the nad ores before the construction documents are completed.is reouired) P: \GEOTECH\2006\Projects \6513 -06 -0450 Walmart High land \GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION FACT SHEET .doc 3 of 3 JOB NO.&'5;k- OF Z AC T E C PHASE TASK i MACTEC Engineering and Consulting, Inc. JOB NAME 2801 Yorkmont Road, Suite 100 BY C2 DATE i I d C;' C1 Charlotte, NC 28208 ' I CHECKED BY C �� DATE 1 R `'r O-9•S abed TV 8 OOOZT 0D, T8 OOOZT 8E 8L OOSTT 9E SL OOOTT DIE 71. OOSOT ZE 89 OOOOT OE S9 90S6. 8z 19 0006 9Z 8S OOS8 bZ {,S 0008 ZZ TS OOSL OZ LTi OOOL g-C ET7 0009 9T 6.E (' ^SS F7 S ir OQ05 7T OE OOS t, OT E'dFrI I Sd 2ig`I Ot ��2I sL►ZnpoL1 �uaiTrsag 6ut�eag xao�auitZ -sanTeA ("W) snTnpoW auatiTsad uLelgO o-4 suoti2nba asagi olut Indui alam legs sanTeA -InduT (�gZ) otae2t 6ut�eag xaozamt, awos axe 6utmoTTo3 aqj SHn IVA aqd vs OHM 011v i SmIllyza �IJ02L3YiI`I Q ('�ri) SEl'IIIQObd SN arusau aaamxaa cuasHOIZf1aRH T ' S H'IaVI TABLE 5_4 STRUCTURAL COIRVFTCTF.NTS FOR DIFFERENT PAVEMENT LAYERS Soil Cement (500 psi) Layer Coef. 270 Soil Layer Per unit Spec. Group Type Thickness Sect. Friction B Stab. (LBR 30) 0.06 160 -2 Courses FC -S 0.00 337 Subgrade Cement Treated (300 psi) FC -12.5, FC -9.5 0.44 337 Structural O_OR 165 Courses Superpave Type SP (SP -9.5, SP -12 _ S, SP -19.0) 0.44 334 ---� Base Limerock (LBR 100) 0.18 200 -� Courses Cemented Coquina (.LBR 100) 0.18 250 (General use) Shell Rock (LBR 100) 0.18 250 Bank Run Shell (LBR 100) 0.18 250 Graded Aggregate (LBR 100) 0.15 204 Type B -12.5 0.30 280 Base Limerock Stab_ (LBR 70) 0.12 230 Courses Shell Stab. (LBR 70) 0.10 260 (Limited use) Sand Clay (LBR 75) 0.12 240 Soil Cement (500 psi) 0.20 270 Soil Cement (300 psi) 0.15 270 Stabilization Type B Stab. (LBR 40) 0.08 160 -2-- -- Type B Stab. (LBR 30) 0.06 160 -2 Typp C Stab_ 0.06 160 -2 Subgrade Cement Treated (300 psi) 0.12 170 Lime Treafcd O_OR 165 Page 5.12.0 I J J TABLE A.3A REQUIRED -- TAucnmAL NUI4DER (3Np) -1185% RELIABILITY MR) RESILIENT MODULUS CM.) RANGE 4000 PSI TO 18000 PSI Ru31L2ENT MODbl.VS (Mn), (POI z 1000) ESAL, 4 5 6 7 W 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 200 000 2.90 '2.66 X2.4 3 2.22 2.12 2.03 1.96 1.89 1.03 1.78 1.73 3.68 1_64 1.60 ISO 000 3.10 2.84'2.65 2.50 2.37 2_27 2.18 2.10 2.03 1.96 1_91 1.85 1.81 1_76 1.72 200 000 3.25 2.98 2_78 2.62 2.49 2.38 2.28 2.20 2.13 2.06 2.00 1_95 1.90 1.85 1_81 250 000 3_37 3 in 2_89 2_72 2.58 2_47 2:37 2.28 2.21 2_14 2.08 2_02 1.97 1.93 1.88 300 000 3.473.19 2_97 12. 80 2_66 2_54 2.44 2.3S 2.20 2.21 2.14 2.03 2.03 1.99 1_94 350 000 3. s6, I -7' 3.05 2.88 2_73 2.61 2.51 2.42 2.34 2.26 2.20 2.14 2.09 2_04 1_99 400 000 3.64 3.35 3_12 2.94 2.79 2.67 2.56 2.47 2.39 2.32 2.25 2.19 2.14 2.09 2_04 450 000 3.71 3.41 3.18 3.00 2_85 2.72 2_61 2.52 2.44 2.36 2.29 2.23 2.18 2.13 2_08 500 000 3.77 3.47 3.27 3_05 2_90 2.77 2.66 2.56 2.40 2.40 2434 2.27 2.22 2.17 2.12 600 000 3.89 3.58.3.34 3_14 2.99 2_85 2.74 2_64 2.55 2.48 2.41 2.34 2.29 2.23 2.18 700 000 3.98 3.67 3.42 3.23 3.06 2.93 2.81 2_71 2.62 2.54 2.47 2.40 2.35 2.29 2.24 800 000 4.07 3.75 3_50 3.30 3.13 2_99 2.88 2.77 2.68 2.60 2.53 2.46 2.40 2_34 2.29 DOO 000 4_14 3.82 3.S6 3 -36 3.19 3.05 2.93 2.83 2_73 2.65 2.58 2.51 2_45 2_39 2_34 1 000 000 4.21 3.88 3.63 3.42 3.25 3.11 2_98 2.88 2.78 2.70 2.62 2.55 2.49 2.43 2.38 1 500 000 4.48 4_14 3.87 3.65 3.47 3.32 3_19 3.08 2_98 2.88 2.80 2.73 2_66 2.60 2.54 2 000 000 4.68 4.33 4.05 3.83 3.64 3_48 3.35 3.23 3.12 3.03 2.94 2.86 2.79 2.73 2.67 2 SOO 000 4_83 4.47 4.19 3.97 3_78 3_61 3_47 3_35 3.24 3.14 3-OS 2.97 2_90 2_83 ].77 3 000 000 4.96 4.60 4.31 4.08 3.09 3.72 3.58 3.45 3.34 3.24 3.15 3.06 2.99 2.92 2.86 3 500 000 5.07 4.70 4.42 4.18 3.98 3.81 3.67 3.54 3.42 3.32 3.23 3.14 3.07 2.99 2.93 4 000 000 5.17 4_80 4_51 4.27 4_07 3_90 3_75 3_61 3.50 3.39 3.30 3.21 3_13 3.06 2_99 4 500 000 S.2S 4.88 4_59 4.35 4.14 3.97 3.82 3_68 3.S7 3.46 3.36 3.38 3.20 3_12 3-CS 5 000 000 5.33 4.95 4.66 4.42 4_21 4.04 3.88 3.75 3.63 3.52 3_42 3.33 3.25 3.18 3.11 6 000 000 5.47 5.08 4.78 4.54 4_33 4_13 4_00 3.86 3.74 3.63 3.53 3_43 3.35 3.27 3.20 7 000 000 5.58 5.20 4.89 4.64 4.43 4.25 4.09 3.95 3.83 3_72 3.61 3.52 3.44 3.36 3.29 9 000 000 5.68 S-294-99 4.74 4.52 4.34 4_19 4_04 3.91 3.80 3.69 3.60 3_Sl 3.43 3.36 9 000 000 5.77 5.38 5.07 4.82 4.68 4.42.4.26 4.11 3.99 3.81 3_76 3.67 3.58 3,50 3.42 10 000 000 5.86 5.46 5.15 4.89 4_68 4.49 4.33 4.18 4.0.5 3.94 3.83 3.73 3.64 3.56 3.48 15 000 000 6.18 5.77 5.45 5.16 4.96 4.77 4.60 4.45 4.31 4.19 4_06 3.98 3.89 3.80 3.72 20 000 000 6.42 S_59 5.67 5.39 5.17 4_07 4.90 4_64 4.51 4.39 4.37 4.16 4.07 3_98 3.90 25 000 000 6.60 6.17 5.84 5_56 5.33 5.13 4.96 4.80 4.66 4_53 4.42 4.31 4.21 4.12 4_04 30 000 000 6.76 6.32 5.98 5.70 5.47 5_26 5.09 4_93 4.79 4_66 4_54 4.43 4.33 4.24 4.15 35 000 000 6.89 6.45 6.10 5.82 5.58 5_38 5.20 5_04 4.B9 4.76 4.64 4.54 4_43 4.34 4.25 40 000 000 7.01 6.56 6.21 5.93 S.69 5_48 5:30 S.13 4.99 4.96 4_74 4.63 4.52 4_43 4.34 45 000 000 7.11 6.66 6.31 6.02 5_78 5_57 5.38 5_22 5.07 4.94 4.82 4.71 4.60 4.51 4.42 50 000 000 7.21 6.75 6.39 6_10 5.86 5.65 5.46 5.30 5.15 S_02 4.89 4_78 4.68 4.58 4.49 60 000 000 7.37 6.91 6.55 6.25 6_00 5.79 5.60 5.43 5.28 5_15 5.02 4.91 4_80 4_71 4_bl 70 000 000 7.52 ')-OS 6_69 6_38 6_12 S_91 S.72 5.55 5.40 5.26 5.13 5.02 4.91 4.81 4_72 80 000 000 7.64 7.17 6.79 6_49 6.23 6_01 5_82 5.65 5.50 5_36 5.23 5.3.1 5.01 4_91 4.81 90 000 000 7.75 7.27 6.89 6.59 6.33 6.11 5.91 5.74 S.59 5.45 5.32 5.20 5.09 4.99 4.90 100 000 000 7.66 7.37 6.99 6.68 6.42 6.19 6_00 5_82 5.67 5.52 5.40 5_28 5.17 5.07 4.97 Page A_9.0 Rigid Pavement Anatysis: FDOT Rigid Pavement Design Manual L)ocument No. W2"10.00ti-b Assume Modulus of Subgrade Reaction =100 pci or 30 MPalm for compacted sands Ref: FDOT Rigid Pvmt Manual Note: for design reliability =.85, Zr = -1.037 Std. Duty EASL zr So Dr Pi Pt Sc Cd 109500 -1.037 0.35 r-13FS-20-81 4.2 2 3447 0.9 Terml Temr2 Term3 Term4 Terrn5 Term6 5.039414119 5.430195 -0.033885881 2.7008 - 0.132164 1064.146 1442.664 5.039361 calc untilzcro: 0-000 5.26 inches say 5 112 inches Heavy Duty EASL zr So Dr Pi Pt Sc Cd 335800 -1.037 0.35 1539826 4.2 2 3447 0.9 Terml Term2 Term3 Term4 Terms Term6 5.526080692 5.989967 -0.080425725 2.7008 - 0.142294 1327.273 1841149 5.525234 calc until zero: 0.001 6.46 inches say 7 inches J Ec Kg 3.2 24132 30 J Ec Kg 32 24132 30 KHA GEOTECHNICAL REVIEW CHECKLIST Reference Current Wal -Mart Guidelines, updated for revision dated 4/11/06 Project Location/Store #: Clearwater Florida Store No. 97873, WNM Review Date Project Manager: Report Due Date Geotechnical Consultant: MACTEC Geotechnical Report Date: 02/25/05 P: \GEOTECH\2006 \Projects \6513 -06 -0450 Walmart Highland \georeviewchecklist.doc General Requirements: S U N/A is licensed in the jurisdiction. ® ❑ ❑ The Geotechnical engineer and experienced project ® ❑ ❑ Project Site Title, Wal -Mart store number, & Wal -Mart sequence number on the cover and each ' ❑ ❑ ® page of geotechnical report. If applicable, the CEC was provided name of company and employer of any subcontractor to be utilized by the Geotechnical Engineering Company. ❑ ❑ ® If applicable, the CEC was provided resumes, project lists, references, and proof of insurance for subcontractor to the Geotechnical Engineering Company. ® ❑ ❑ Proof of Insurance provided by the Geotechnical Engineering Company. Building Structural Load Data: Wal -Mart Building Structural Load Data: (The geotechnical report shall reference the following design data.) ' S U N/A ® ❑ ❑ If the automotive center includes a service trench area, the report shall include retaining wall design coefficients for active, passive, and "at rest" conditions shall include equivalent fluid pressure for active conditions and coefficient of friction. Bay Spacing: S U N/A ❑ ❑ ® Wal -Mart Proto 100, 134,137, and 139 is approximately 48 feet x 50 feet ❑ ❑ ® Sam's Club Proto 113,128,135, and 150 is approximately 60 feet x 40 feet ® ❑ ❑ Neighborhood Market Pi•oto 39 is approximately 43 feet x 60 feet ❑ ❑ ® Supercenter Proto 98, 99, 107, 145,173,192, and the 195 is approximately 55 feet x 48 feet ' Interior Gravity Load to Interior Column: S U N/A ❑ ❑ ® Wal -Mart Proto 100,134, 137, and 139 typical interior gravity -load is 77 kips ❑ ❑ ® Sam's Club Proto 113, 128, 135, and 150 typical interior gravity load is 80 kips ® ❑ ❑ Neighborhood Market Proto 39 typical interior gravity load is 85 kips ❑ ❑ ® Supercenter Proto 98, 99, 107, 145, 173,192, and the 195 typical interior gravity load is 85 kips Maximum Gravity Load: S U N/A ❑ ® Wal -Mart Proto 100,134,137, and 139 estimated max. gravity loads due to severe live loading is 125 kips. ' ❑ ❑ ® Sam's Club Proto 113, 128, 135, and 150 estimated max gravity load due to severe live loading is 150 kips. ® ❑ ❑ Neighborhood Market Proto 39 estimated max gravity load due to severe live loading is 150 kips. ❑ ❑ ® Supercenter Proto 98, 99,107,145,173,192, and the 195 estimated max gravity load due to severe live loading is 150 kips. S Exterior Column Gravity Load: U N/A ❑ ❑ ® Wal -Mart Proto 100, 134, 137, and 139 estimated typical exterior column gravity load is 40 kips. ❑ ❑ ® Sam's Club Proto 113,128,135, and 150 estimated typical exterior column gravity load is 50 kips. ® ❑ ❑ Neighborhood Market Proto 39 estimated typical exterior column gravity load is 50 kips. ❑ ❑ ® Supercenter Proto 98, 99,107,145,173,192, and the 195 estimated typical exterior column gravity load is 50 kips. P: \GEOTECH\2006 \Projects \6513 -06 -0450 Walmart Highland \georeviewchecklist.doc 02/25/05 Concrete Masonry Wall Gravity Load Ranges: ' S ❑ U ❑ N/A ® Wal -Mart Prato 100,134,137, and 139 load ranges between 1.5 and 2.0 kips per linear foot. ❑ ❑ ® Sam's Club Proto 113,128,135, and 150 load ranges between 1.5 and 3.0 kips per linear foot. ® ❑ ❑ Neighborhood Market Proto 39 load ranges between 1.5 and 2.0 kips per linear foot for non -load bearing walls and 4.0 to 6.0 kips per linear foot for load bearing walls. ❑ ❑ ® Supercenter Proto 98,99, 107Y 145, 173,192, and the 195 load ranges between 1.5 and 2.0 kips per linear foot for non -load bearing walls and 4.0 to 6.0 kips per linear foot for load bearing walls. Maximum Uniform Floor Slab Live Load: S U N/A ❑ ❑ ® Wal -Mart Prato 100,134,137, and 139 estimated maximum load is 125 psf. ❑ ❑ ® Sam's Club Proto 113,128,135, and 150 estimated maximum load is 250 psf. ®. ❑ ❑ Neighborhood Market Proto 39 estimated maximum load is 125 psf. f ❑ ❑ ® Supercenter Proto 98, 99,107,1459 173,192, and the 195 estimated maximum load is 125 psf. Maximum Concentrated Floor Load: ' S U N/A ❑ ❑ ® Wal -Mart Prato 100,134,137, and 139 estimated maximum load is 5.0 kips. ❑ ❑ ® Sam's Club Proto 113,128,135, and 150 estimated maximum load is 16.0 kips. ® ❑ ❑ Neighborhood Market Proto 39 estimated maximum load is 5.0 kips. ' ❑ ❑ ® Supercenter Proto 98, 99,107, 145, 173,192, and the 195 estimated maximum load is 5.0 kips. Maximum Column Uplift from Wind: S U N/A ❑ ❑ ® Sam's Club Proto 113,128,135, and 150 estimated maximum uplift is estimated at 30.0 kips. ® El Market Proto 39 estimated maximum uplift is estimated at 30.0 kips. ❑ ❑ ® Supercenter Proto 98,99,107,145, 173,192, and the 195 estimated maximum uplift is estimated at 30.0 kips. Minimum Scope of Services: Soil Borings in Building Area: S U N/A ' ❑ ❑ ❑ Borings within building footprint and along the perimeter of the building are equally spaced with regard to the building comers. ❑ ❑ ® Expansion Building: minimum of one boring per 10,000 s.f., but no less than a total of three. ® ❑ ❑ New Building up to 100,000 s.f., minimum of nine (9) borings required. ❑ ❑ ® New Building from 100,000 s.f. to 170,000 s.L, minimum of twelve (12) borings are required. ❑ ❑ ® New Building larger than 170,000 s.f., minimum of fifteen (15) borings are required. ❑ ❑ ® At least one boring located in the pit area of the T.L.E area. ® ❑ ❑ Soil borings are a minimum of twenty feet below the proposed finish floor elevation, or twenty feet below the natural ground surface, whichever is greater. ❑ ❑ ® A minimum of one boring was advanced to a depth of 100 feet below finished grade to determine the Site Class for buildings located in International Building Code Jurisdiction. ® ❑ ❑ Report includes a ground water level taken at the time of borings and 24 hours after the time of borings. ® ❑ ❑ Borings reflect surveyed locations (Horizontal and Vertical) *Borings locations were measured from existing ground features. ' Soil Borings in Non - Building Areas: S U N/A ® ❑ ❑ Borings are in a grid pattern at a maximum spacing of 100 feet *In new pavement areas ® ❑ ❑ Borings are completed to a minimum depth of 10 feet below the finished grade elevation, or 10 feet ' below the natural ground, whichever is greater. ® ❑ ❑ At least one boring was performed in each retention/detention pond area. ® ❑ ❑ Report includes a ground water level taken at the time of borings and 24 hours after the time of ' ® ❑ ❑ borings. Borings reflect surveyed locations (Horizontal and Vertical) *Borings locations were measured from existing ground features. P: \GEOTECH\2006 \Projects \6513 -06 -0450 Walmart Highland \georeviewchecklist.doc 1i - 02/25/05 Soil Borings in Off Site Construction Areas (Utility and Roadway Extensions): S U N/A ❑ ❑ ® Off site borings match the requirements identified in the approved proposal. ❑ ❑ ® Report includes a ground water level taken at the time of borings and 24 hours after the time of borings. ❑ ❑ ® Borings reflect surveyed locations (Horizontal and Vertical) *Borings locations were measured from existing ground features. Analytical Test Schedule: S U N/A ® ❑ ❑ Split spoon test, in granular soil or thin wall Shelby tube test, in cohesive soils was performed at intervals listed on sheet 3 of 12 of the Wal -Mart Geotechnical Investigation Specifications and Report Requirements. ❑ ❑ ® Organic content tested and upper surface suitability determined. Report identifies if these soils are suitable for topsoil, engineered fill for building pad, paved areas, detention ponds, berms, etc. ® ❑ ❑ Natural Density and Moisture Content Tests conducted. ® ❑ ❑ Atterberg Limits Tests — A Representative number of Plastic Limit (PL) Tests and Liquid Limit (LL) Tests conducted for each cohesive soil stratum encountered. If there are no cohesive soils on the site, ' state such in the report. ® ❑ ❑ Cohesion and Internal Friction Angle determined for site cuts exceeding ten feet. ❑ ❑ ® Slope stability Triaxial tests or multiple triaxial tests performed on samples from cut areas and where ❑ ❑ ® cut/fill slopes are 2:1 or steeper. All Shelby Tube Cohesive samples taken within the building area tested for unconfined compressive strength. ® ❑ ❑ Soaked CBR, R -Value Tests, or LBR tests performed on each soil stratum expected to be used for pavement subgrade. ® ❑ ❑ Sieve Analysis test was conducted on each soil stratum. ❑ ❑ ® One Moisture Density Test was conducted for each soil stratum to be compacted in the grading process. Proctor curves included in the geotechnical report plotted with a minimum of four points. ❑ ❑ ® A minimum of three pH tests and three Resistivity tests performed on soils below subgrade ❑ ❑ ® elevation. Consolidation Tests performed on soil layers that have settlement potential large enough to cause structural damage. ❑ ❑ ® Swell Tests performed on potentially expansive clays. Report Requirements: S U N/A ® ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Report identifies the site with regard to streets and highways Report provides a description of the topography, drainage conditions, and surface vegetation. ® ❑ ❑ Report includes a discussion of surface features including rock outcrops,' existing structures, debris, unstable or wet surface conditions, and a discussion of any soil related factors that affect foundation design. El ❑ ❑ Report includes a description of subsurface materials. ' ® ❑ ❑ Report includes a ground water level at time of boring, seasonal high water table, and seasonal water level range. ® ❑ ❑ Report includes a ground water level at the time of boring and at 24 hours after the time of boring. ❑ ❑ ® Recommendation for removal and disposal of debris as well as estimated quantities is identified, if ' applicable. ® ❑ ❑ Report includes a boring location site plan, per the Wal -Mart Geotechnical Investigation Specifications and Report Requirements, page 5 of 12. ® ❑ ❑ Report includes a completed "Geotechnical Investigation Fact Sheet" per page 8 of 12 of the Wal- Mart Geotechnical Investigation Specifications and Report Requirements. ® ❑ ❑ Report includes a completed "Foundation Design Criteria" form per page 9 of 12 of the Wal -Mart Geotechnical Investigation Specifications and Report Requirements. ® ❑ ❑ Report includes a completed modified prototypical "Foundation Subsurface Preparation" note per page 10 of 12 of the Wal -Mart Geotechnical Investigation Specifications and Report Requirements. ' ® ❑ ❑ At least six (6) copies of the report (9 for Sam's /Wal -Mart combination site) forwarded to CEC for review and distribution. ® ❑ ❑ Report includes a recommendation for angles of repose for slopes /ponds. ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ® ® Report includes an analysis of hydraulic conductivity, if applicable. Report includes an estimate of soil shrinkage from excavation and placing/compaction elsewhere on site. ❑ ❑ ® Demucking /Canal reclamation procedures (if applicable) ❑ ❑ ® If a surcharge is recommended, an estimated time delay is provided. ❑ ❑ ® Report includes cost to import till from offsite and distances to the local borrow pits. *Costs arc ' based on demand and will vary. ' P: \GEOTECH\2006 \Projects \6513 -06 -0450 Walmart Highland \georeviewchecklist.doc I .I Seismic Conditions: S 02/25/05 N/A ' ® Foundation and Slab Design Recommendations: ❑ S U N/A ® ❑ ❑ Foundation and Slab Design Recommendation based on the sub -grade compacted to a minimum of following: From the [BC Code (Site Class per section 1615.1.1, and proximity to active faults or 98%n of maximum dry density, in accordance with ASTM Test Method D -698; or 95% of optimum j density, in accordance with ASTM D -1557. ® ❑ ❑ Maximum allowable differential settlement for soils supporting masonry wall matches the requirements shown on page 5 of 12 of the Wal -Mart Geotechnical Investigation Specifications and Codes (Soil profile type per Chapter 16, and proximity to active faults or fault traces). Report Requirements (0.53 inches in 40 feet length) ® ® ❑ ❑ Maximum allowable differential settlement for soil supporting interior slabs or interior isolated Seismic hazard zone or earthquake fault zone is identified in the geotechnical report, if applicable. footings matches the requirements shown on page 5 of 12 of the Wal -Mart Geotechnical ❑ ❑ Investigation Specifications and Report Requirements (0.96 inches in 40 feet length) ' ® ❑ ❑ Maximum allowable Total movement is +0 (rise), -linch settlement for exposed concrete slabs. ® ❑ ❑ Maximum allowable Total movement is +1 inch (rise), -1 inch settlement for slabs with tile flooring. ❑ ❑ ® The design includes a recommendation for the most economical mitigation procedures to limit the potential vertical rise. ' ❑ ❑ ® The report includes specific construction procedures required to accommodate movements in the ® If applicable, building sites located on soils that are subject to subsidence, special design expansive clays. ® ❑ ❑ A 4" sub -base is prototypical for slabs with tile coverings and a 6" base is prototypical for a exposed requirements for under slab MEP systems and utility connections are included in the report (especially in the Mississippi Delta region of Louisiana). concrete slab. If recommendation differs, a specific justification is provided. ❑ ® ❑ ❑ For slabs with tile floors Wal -Mart's preference is a crusher run material equal to ASTM 1241 Grade ' P: \GEOTECH\2006 C or D or a similar locally available material that can be specified by a DOT gradation number. \Projects \6513 ® ❑ ❑ For exposed concrete slabs Wal -Mart's preference is as follows: -06 -0450 Course Aggregate Base — ASTM D448 No. 467, 57, or 67 with crushed, interlocking rock fines or crushed run road base with rock fines, or a similar locally available material that can be specified by a DOT gradation number. Fine Aggregate Base (placed over course aggregate to reduce subsurface friction). The base is to provide a clean granular fill with less than 3% clay and/or friable particles. The base gradation shall be per ASTM 448 No. 10 with 6% to 12% passing no. 200 sieve or per the table on page 6 of 13 of the Wal -Mart Geotechnical Investigation Specifications. ® ❑ ❑ Acceptable methods of controlling moisture through the building are as follows: For slabs with tile floors, Wal -Marts preference is a capillary break of free draining crushed aggregate or a vapor barrier overlain with a minimum of 4" of small aggregate material equal to ASTM D 1241 Grade C or D, a material such as clean sand is not acceptable. ' For exposed Concrete Slabs, Wal -Mart will accept sheet vapor retarder placed directly under the slab when justified by severe site conditions or by local code. ® ❑ ❑ Select backfill at truck dock walls, foundation walls, and /or grade beams identified and locally ' ❑ ❑ ® available. A cross section illustrating the backfill recommendation at dock walls, foundation wall, and/or grade beam. ® ❑ ❑ Method of achieving a subgrade modulus of at least 150 psi /in for the floor slab design, including the associated costs. ❑ ❑ ® No Type I or Type 11 cement for below grade structures. ' ® ❑ ❑ A minimum of two recommendations addressing field performance for dry and wet weather conditions, including dates for anticipated wet weather. ❑ ❑ ® Illustrations and locations of all recommended subsurface drainage systems are shown, if applicable. ❑ ❑ ® If piles, piers, or alternate foundations are recommended, the report includes design parameters, details, and comparisons of costs and schedules. ® ❑ ❑ Active, passive, "at rest" design coefficients as well as equivalent fluid pressure for active condition are listed in the report. ❑ ❑ ® For expansion projects, if the pad prep recommendation differ from the original recommendation, a . site justification and written explanation is included as well as the original Geotechnical report and Foundation Subsurface Preparation Note. Seismic Conditions: S U N/A ' ® ❑ ❑ If applicable, the seismic criteria determined from the local building jurisdiction shall include the following: From the [BC Code (Site Class per section 1615.1.1, and proximity to active faults or fault traces), from UBC (Seismic Zone per chapter 16, and site coefficient), and from BOAC & SBC Codes (Soil profile type per Chapter 16, and proximity to active faults or fault traces). ' ® ❑ ❑ Seismic hazard zone or earthquake fault zone is identified in the geotechnical report, if applicable. ® ❑ ❑ Liquefaction potential identified if groundwater is encountered at depths less than 40 feet below the site grade. ' Soil Subsidence Conditions: ❑ ❑ ® If applicable, building sites located on soils that are subject to subsidence, special design ' requirements for under slab MEP systems and utility connections are included in the report (especially in the Mississippi Delta region of Louisiana). ❑ ❑ ® The Geotechnical Engineer report addresses procedures /design solutions to counter this condition. ' P: \GEOTECH\2006 \Projects \6513 Walmart Highland \georeviewchecklist.doc -06 -0450 Design Criteria: U ` •1 ® 02/25/05 I Minimum Standard Duty Asphalt = 3" ® ❑ Minimum Pavement Design recommendations: ' S U N/A ❑ ❑ ® ❑ ❑ Pavement design based on a subgrade compaction of 95% of the standard Proctor density or 95% of ❑ ❑ the Modified Proctor density (ASTM D -1557) ® ® ❑ ❑ A cross section illustrating pavement design of LOCALLY AVAILABLE materials is included Locally Available materials recommended for the pavement design identified in the report by page, with references to the respective State Highway Standard specifications. ® 0 ❑ Pavement Design shows two transverse lifts. Design Criteria: ■ ■ ►5 ■ ■ ■ ►1 El El EEII ►4 ■ ►1 ■ ■I 20 year design life, based on ESAL (18 kips) for all protos. Terminal serviceability = 2.0 Reliability = 85% Initial serviceability = 4.2 Standard deviation = 0.45 for flexible pavement, and 0.35 for rigid pavement. For a Sam's Club the Minimum Daily ESAL's = 6 for standard duty pavement and 46 for heavy - duty pavement. For a Division 1 Store the Minimum Daily ESAL's = 10 for standard duty pavement and 23 for heavy -duty pavement. For a Supercenter the Minimum Daily ESAL's = 15 for standard duty pavement and 46 fo'r heavy - duty pavement. For a Neighborhood Market the Minimum Daily ESAL's = 15 for standard duty pavement and 29 for heavy -duty pavement. For a Sam's Club the Minimum 20 Year Design Life = 43,800 for standard duty pavement and 335,800 for heavy -duty pavement. For a Division 1 Store the Minimum 20 Year Design Life = 73,000 for standard duty pavement and 167,900 for heavy -duty pavement. For a Neighborhood Market the Minimum 20 Year Design Life = 109,500 for standard duty pavement and 211,700 for heavy -duty pavement. For a Supercenter or Neighborhood Markets the Minimum 20 Year Design Life = 109,500 for standard duty pavement and 335,800 for heavy -duty pavement. Paving design uses the "AASHTO Guide for design of Pavement Structures 1993 ". The subgrade design value shall be stated in the report: Alternate state approved design method used if applicable. Assumptions, calculations, tables and plots used for pavement design included in Appendices. Minimum Asphalt/Concrete Thickness: S U ` •1 ® ❑ ❑ Minimum Standard Duty Asphalt = 3" ® ❑ ❑ Minimum Standard Duty Concrete = 5" ® ❑ ❑ Heavy Duty Asphalt = 4" ® ❑ ❑ Heavy Duty Concrete = 6" ® ■ ■ ►5 ■ ■ ■ ►1 El El EEII ►4 ■ ►1 ■ ■I 20 year design life, based on ESAL (18 kips) for all protos. Terminal serviceability = 2.0 Reliability = 85% Initial serviceability = 4.2 Standard deviation = 0.45 for flexible pavement, and 0.35 for rigid pavement. For a Sam's Club the Minimum Daily ESAL's = 6 for standard duty pavement and 46 for heavy - duty pavement. For a Division 1 Store the Minimum Daily ESAL's = 10 for standard duty pavement and 23 for heavy -duty pavement. For a Supercenter the Minimum Daily ESAL's = 15 for standard duty pavement and 46 fo'r heavy - duty pavement. For a Neighborhood Market the Minimum Daily ESAL's = 15 for standard duty pavement and 29 for heavy -duty pavement. For a Sam's Club the Minimum 20 Year Design Life = 43,800 for standard duty pavement and 335,800 for heavy -duty pavement. For a Division 1 Store the Minimum 20 Year Design Life = 73,000 for standard duty pavement and 167,900 for heavy -duty pavement. For a Neighborhood Market the Minimum 20 Year Design Life = 109,500 for standard duty pavement and 211,700 for heavy -duty pavement. For a Supercenter or Neighborhood Markets the Minimum 20 Year Design Life = 109,500 for standard duty pavement and 335,800 for heavy -duty pavement. Paving design uses the "AASHTO Guide for design of Pavement Structures 1993 ". The subgrade design value shall be stated in the report: Alternate state approved design method used if applicable. Assumptions, calculations, tables and plots used for pavement design included in Appendices. Minimum Asphalt/Concrete Thickness: S U N/A ® ❑ ❑ Minimum Standard Duty Asphalt = 3" ® ❑ ❑ Minimum Standard Duty Concrete = 5" ® ❑ ❑ Heavy Duty Asphalt = 4" ® ❑ ❑ Heavy Duty Concrete = 6" ® ❑ ❑ Locally Available materials recommended for the pavement design identified in the report by page, section, and description in the.current State Highway Specifications, with the structural coefficient shown for each material. This data appended to the geotechnical report. ® ❑ ❑ A minimum 4" granular base course shall be provided for all pavement sections. ® ❑ ❑ No full depth asphalt or concrete sections are recommended. ' . P: \GEOTECH\2006 \Projects \6513 -06 -0450 Walmart Highland \georeviewchecklist.doc I I 0 'I i 1 1 t I I A09 LEGEND 0141 = Retail and Services (4.91± ac) Sources: Aerial Express. 2003 AE, LLC. 2003 GDT, Inc. Southwest Florida Water Management District. GIS Data. FDOT Florida Land Use, Cover and Forms Classification System, Handbook. January 1999. f Klmley-Horn VEGETATIVE COMMUNITIES (FLUCFCS) MAP and Associates, Inc. WAL -MART - CLEARWATER HIGHLAND F 10117 Princess Palm Avenue, Suite 300 �� Tampa, Florida 33610 STORE NO. 97873, WNM Phone: (813) 620 -1460 CITY OF CLEARWATER, FL Fax: (813) 620 -1542 SCALE: PROJ. NO.: DATE: FIGURE: Copyright 2007, Kimley -Horn and Associates, Inc. NTS 047253651 1 February 2007 A.9