FLD2011-12042; 1916 CALUMET ST; ROBERT SMITH PROPERTY � _ _
�
1916 CALUMET ST
Date Received: 12/1/2011 9:18:08 AM
Robert Smith Property
ZONING DISTRICT: Industrial Research
and Technology
LAND USE: Industrial General
ATLAS PAGE: 262A
PLANNER OF RECORD: ESC
PLANNER: Ellen Crandall, Planner II
CDB Meeting Date: Februarv 21, 2012
Case Number: FLD2011-12042
Agenda Item: D. 1.
Owner/Applicant: Robert I. Smith, Jr.
Agent: Barr_y P. Ullmann
Address: 1916 Calumet Street
CITY OF CLEARWATER
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
STAFF REPORT
GENERAL INFORMATION:
REQUEST: Flexible Development application to permit 7,300 square feet of
warehouse and manufacturing in the Industrial Research and
Technology (IRT) District with a lot area of 18,014 square feet, a lot
width of 128.67 feet, a front(south) setback of 1.09 feet (to
pavement),and 27.09 feet (to building), a side (west) setback of 17.6
feet (to building), a side (east) setback of 20.33 feet (to building), a rear
(north) setback of 32.63 feet(to building), a building height of 21.5 feet
(to top of flat roo fl, and six parking spaces (0.82 per thousand feet of
floor area)as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project under the
provisions of Community Development Code Section 2-1301.1 and 2-
1304.C, as well as a reduction to the foundation landscape requirement
on the front(south) fa�ade from five feet to zero feet and a reduction of
the front(south) landscape buffer from 10 feet to 1.09 feet, as part of a
Comprehensive Landscape Program under the provisions of
Community Development Code Section 3-1202.G.
ZONING DISTRICT: Industrial, Research, and Technology (IRT) District
FUTURE LAND USE
PLAN CATEGORY: Industrial General (IG)
PROPERTY USE: Current: Vacant
Proposed: Warehousing and Manufacturing
EXISTING North: Unincorporated Pinellas County
SURROUNDING Storm water retention pond
ZONING AND USES: South: Industrial, Reseazch, and Technology (IRT) District
Warehousing and Manufacturing
East: Industrial, Research, and Technology (IRT) District
Vehicle Service
West: Industrial, Research, and Technology (IRT) District
Vacant
Community Development Board—February 21,2012
FLD201 1- 12042—Page 1
ANALYSIS:
Site Location and Existing Conditions:
The 0.41 acre property consists of a 7,300 square foot building with non-conforming back-out
parking spaces. The site has historically held industrial uses, most recently manufacturing as
Fairchilds Iron Works, however the site has been vacant for more than six months.
The surrounding properties, excluding the property to the north, are within the City of Clearwater
and the IRT District. The property to the south is a contractor's office, the property to the east is
a vehicle repair, and the property to the west is currently vacant. The surrounding buildings are
industrial in appearance and have Iimited architectural improvements or aesthetics. The property
to the north is in unincorporated Pinellas County and is a large storm water retention pond.
Development Proposal:
The request proposes to use the existing 7,300 square foot building for warehousing and
manufacturing. The applicant proposes six off-street parking spaces, where 11 are required, and
has provided a parking demand study justifying the reduction. For this reason,the application has
been submitted as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project. The applicant is also
requesting the overhead utilities to remain as-is as relocating them underground is cost
prohibitive. The front (south) fa�ade will be improved with awnings over the entrances .
The proposal's compliance with the applicable development standards of the Community
Development Code (CDC) is discussed below.
Floor Area Ratio (FAR� Pursuant to the Countywide Plan Rules and CDC Section 2-1301.1,the
m�imum allowable FAR is 0.75. The overall proposed FAR is 0.41, which is consistent with
the Code provisions.
Impervious Surface Ratio (ISR): Pursuant to the Countywide Plan Rules and CDC Section 2-
1301.1, the m�imum allowable ISR is 0.95. The overall proposed ISR is 0.65, which is
consistent with the Code provisions.
Minimum Lot Area and Width: Pursuant to CDC Table 2-1304,there is no minimum required lot
area or lot width for a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project. However, for a point of
comparison, the minimum lot area requirement for warehouse facility is 20,000 square feet. The
subject property has a lot area of 18,014 square feet (0.41 acres). The minimum lot width
requirement for a warehouse facility is 200 feet. The width of the subject property is 128.67 feet
along Calumet Street. The proposal is consistent with these criteria.
Minimum Setbacks: Pursuant to CDC Table 2-1304, there are no minimum setback requirements
for a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project. However, for a point of comparison, the
minimum front setback requirement for warehouse facility is 20 feet while a minimum side
setback is 15 feet. Specific to this project is a front(south) setback of 1.09 feet (to pavement), and
27.09 feet (to building), a side (west) setback of 17.6 feet (to building), a side (east) setback of
20.33 feet (to building), a rear (north) setback of 32.63 feet(to building). The reduced front
setbacks are justified as these are necessary to provide the conforming off-street parking.
Enhancements will be made in the form of landscaping. Specifically the west side of the property
Community Development Board—February 21,2012
FLD201 1- 12042—Page 2
will be improved with landscaping as well as the landscaping in the front parking islands. For
this reason, the application has been submitted as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment
Proj ect.
M�imum Building Height: Pursuant to CDC Table 2-1304, there is no maximum allowable
height for a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project. However, for a point of comparison,
the m�imum building height for warehouse facility is 50 feet in height. The proposed height of
the building addition is 21.5 feet (to top of flat roo�. The proposed building height is less than
the Code provisions.
Minimum Off-Street Parkin�: Pursuant to CDC Table 2-1304, the minimum required parking for
a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project is determined by the Community Development
Coordinator based on the specific use and/or ITE Manual standards. The minimum off-street
parking requirement for warehouse or manufacturing facility uses is 1.5 spaces per 1,000 square
feet of gross floor area which requires the applicant to provide 11 parking spaces on site.
Currently, the property has non-conforming back-out parking spaces; however, the development
proposes 6 new off-street parking spaces located on the south side of the property. These off-
street parking spaces shall be designed in accordance with the standards set forth in CDC Section
3-1402. For this reason, a parking demand study was required to justify the reduction in off-
street parking.
The parking demand study found that 5 parking spaces will be adequate for this facility. A study
was conducted at 1914 Calumet which is a similar use of warehousing and manufacturing in the
same industrial park. The study was conducted between 8 am and 5 pm on a normal weekday,
Tuesday December 13, 2011. The counts were taken to determine the number of staff at the
facility and the number of parking spaces used at various times of day. As previously
mentioned, work performed within this facility includes manufactures, stores, repairs, and
distributes horse exercise equipment. Based on the parking demand study, the most heavily used
parking occurs on weekdays with a maximum of 2 parked vehicles, or 0.23 parking spaces per
thousand feet of floor area. The project site proposes 2-3 staff inembers and at 0.23 per thousand
would require 5 spaces. Based on the findings,the six parking spaces proposed is acceptable by
staff.
Landsca�n�: Pursuant to CDC Section 3-1202.D.1, this site is required a 15 foot wide landscape
buffer along Calumet Street, as well as 5 foot wide landscape buffers within each side and rear
yard. The east property line has a shared access agreement and does not require a landscape
buffer. The front landscape buffer is proposed at 1.09 feet and the foundation landscaping along
Calumet is reduced to zero to accommodate necessary compliant parking stalls. The landscape
buffer to the west will be increased to 17.6 feet in width and will have new shrubs and trees. The
buffer to the north currently has an existing oak and palms and is an existing drainage area. No
additional landscaping is provided to the north due to the existing drainage and trees. A condition
of approval has been added to ensure that all landscaping must be installed prior to receiving a
Certificate of Completion.
The landscape areas to the south will contain 100 percent shrubs and accent trees while the
landscape buffer to the west will have a solid hedge row and will have one shade tree one shade
Community Development Board—February 21,2012
FLD2011- 12042—Page 3
tree every 35 feet as set forth in CDC Section 3-1202.D. All proposed plant material shall be
Florida Grade No. 1 or better.
In regards to interior landscaping requirements, the vehicular use area is less than 4,000 square
feet and interior landscaping is not required set forth in CDC Sections 3-1202.E.1
Pursuant to CDC Section 3-1202.C, it shall be a condition of approval that the applicants install
an automatic permanent irrigation system providing complete water coverage for all required and
other landscaping materials and be maintained as a fully functioning system in order to preserve
the landscaping in a healthy growing condition or submit evidence that an irrigation system
exists that will provide complete water coverage for the new landscaping.
Solid Waste: The applicant has proposed no changes to the existing method of waste collection
and will continue to use black barrel pick-up. The proposal has been found to be acceptable by
the City's Solid Waste Department.
Si�ht Visibilit�Triangles: Pursuant to CDC Section 3-904.A, to minimize any hazards at the
driveways, no structures or landscaping may be installed which will obstruct views at a level
between 30 inches above grade and eight feet above grade within 20-foot sight visibility
triangles. No structure or landscaping exceeding either 30 inches or more is proposed within the
site triangles.
Code Enforcement Analysis: There are no active Code Enforcement cases for the subject
property.
COMPLIANCE WITH STANDARDS AND CRITERIA:
The following table depicts the consistency of the development proposal with the standards of
the Industrial General (IG) future land use plan category and the Industrial, Research, and
Technology (IRT) District as per CDC Section 2-1302 and Table 2-1304:
Standard Proposed Consistent Inconsistent
FAR 0.75 0.41 X
ISR 0.95 0.65 X
Minimum Lot Area N/A 1,8014 sq.ft.(0.41 acres) X
Minimum Lot Width N/A 128.67 feet X
Minimum Setbacks Front: N/A South: 1.09 feet(to pavement) X
27.09 feet(to building)
Side: N/A West: 17.6 feet(to building) X
North: 32.63 feet(to building) X
East: 2033 feet(to building) X
Maximum Height N/A 21.5 feet(to flat roofl X
Minimum 1.5 spaces per 1,000 SF GFA 6 spaces X
Off-Street Parking
Community Development Board—February 21,2012
FLD201 1- 12042—Page 4
COMPLIANCE WITH FLEXIBILITY CRITERIA:
The following table depicts the consistency of the development proposal with the Flexibility
criteria as per CDC Section 2-1304. (Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project):
Consistent Inconsistent
1. The development or redevelopment is otherwise impractical without deviations from X
the use and/or development standards set forth in this zoning district.
2. The development or redevelopment will be consistent with the goals and policies of X
the Comprehensive Plan, as well as with the general purpose, intent and basic
planning objectives of this Code, and with the intent and purpose of this zoning
district.
3. The development or redevelopment will not impede the normal and orderly X
development and improvement of surrounding properties.
4. Adjoining properties will not suffer substantial detriment as a result of the proposed X
development
5. The proposed use shall otherwise be permitted by the underlying future land use X
category, be compatible with adjacent land uses, will not substantially alter the
essential use characteristics of the neighborhood;and shall demonstrate compliance
with one or more of the following objectives:
a. The proposed use is permitted in this zoning district as a minimum standard,
flexible standazd or flexible development use;
b. The proposed use would be a significant economic contributor to the City's
economic base by diversifying the local economy or by creating jobs;
c. The development proposal accommodates the expansion or redevelopment of an
existing economic contributor;
d. The proposed use provides for the provision of affordable housing;
e. The proposed use provides for development or redevelopment in an area that is
characterized by other similar development and where a land use plan
amendment and rezoning would result in a spot land use or zoning designation;
or
f. The proposed use provides for the development of a new and/or preservation of a
working waterfront.
6. Flexibility with regard to use, lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street X
parking are justified based on demonstrated compliance with all of the following
design objectives:
a. The proposed development will not impede the normal and orderly development
and improvement of the surrounding properties for uses permitted in this zoning
district;
b. The proposed development compiies with applicable design guidelines adopted
by the City;
c. The design, scale and intensity of the proposed development supports the
established or emerging character of an area;
d. In order to form a cohesive, visually interesting and attractive appearance, the
proposed development incorporates a substantial number of the following design
elements:
D Changes in horizontal building planes;
O Use of architectural details such as columns, cornices, stringcourses,
pilasters,porticos,balconies,railings,awnings,etc.;
❑ Variety in materials,colors and textures;
❑ Distinctive fenestration patterns;
❑ Building step backs;and
❑ Distinctive roofs forms.
e. The proposed development provides for appropriate buffers,enhanced landscape
desi and a ro riate distances between buildin s.
Community Development Board—February 21,2012
FLD2011- 12042—Page 5
COMPLIANCE WITH GENERAL STANDARDS FOR LEVEL TWO APPROVALS:
The following table depicts the consistency of the development proposal with the General
Standards for Level Two Approvals as per CDC Section 3-914.A:
Consistent Inconsistent
l. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, X
coverage,density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located.
2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage development and use of X
adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof.
3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons X
residing or working in the neighborhood.
4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. X
5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the X
immediate vicinity.
6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including X
visual,acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts on adjacent properties.
SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION:
The Development Review Committee (DRC) reviewed the application and supporting materials
at its meeting of Januaxy 5, 2011, and deemed the development proposal to be legally sufficient
to move forward to the Community Development Board (CDB), based upon the following:
Findings of Fact. The Planning and Development Department, having reviewed all evidence
submitted by the applicant and requirements of the Community Development Code, finds that
there is substantial competent evidence to support the following findings of fact:
1. That the 0.41 acre subject property is located at the north side of Calumet Street roughly 900
feet west of Hercules Avenue;
2. That the subject property is located within the Industrial, Research and Technology (IRT)
District and the Industrial General (IG) Future Land Use Plan category;
3. The site is currently improved with a 7,300 square foot of gross floor building;
4. The subject property has a lot area of 18,014 square feet (0.41 acres), a lot width of 128.67
feet(along Calumet Street);
5. The maximum allowable FAR is 0.75,the proposed FAR is 0.41;
6. The m�imum allowable ISR is 0.95, the proposed ISR is 0.65;
7. The application proposes to redevelop the building for warehousing and manufacturing and
redevelop the site with 6 parking stalls;
8. The building will be 21.5 feet in height(to flat roo� ;
9. The development proposes to increase the number of off-street parking spaces from zero to 6
spaces;
10. The submitted parking demand study demonstrates that 6 off-street parking spaces will be
adequate for parking needs for the warehouse and manufacturing facility during all periods of
hours of operation; and
1 l. There are no active Code Enforcement cases for the subject property.
Conclusions of Law. The Planning and Development Department, having made the above
findings of fact, reaches the following conclusions of law:
Community Development Board—February 21,2012
FLD201 1- 12042—Page 6
1. That the development proposal is consistent with the Standards as per Section 2-1301.1 and
Table 2-1304 of the Community Development Code;
2. That the development proposal is consistent with the Flexibility criteria as per Section 2-
1304.0 of the Community Development Code;
3. That the development proposal is consistent with the General Standards for Level Two
Approvals as per Section 3-914.A of the Community Development Code; and
4. That the development proposal is consistent with the General Standards for Comprehensive
Landscape Program as per Section 3-1202.G. of the Community Development Code.
Based upon the above,the Planning and Development Department recommends APPROVAL of
this Flexible Development application to permit a 7,300 square feet of warehouse and
manufacturing in the Industrial Research and Technology (IRT) District with a lot area of 18,014
square feet, a lot width of 128.67 feet, a front(south) setback of 1.09 feet (to pavement),and
27.09 feet (to building), a side (west) setback of 17.6 feet (to building), a side (east) setback of
20.33 feet (to building), a rear (north) setback of 32.63 feet(to building), a building height of
21.5 feet (to top of flat roo fl, and six parking spaces (0.82 per thousand feet of floor area)as a
Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project under the provisions of Community Development
Code Section 2-1301.1 and 2-1304.C, as well as a reduction to the foundation landscape
requirement on the front(south) fa�ade from five feet to zero feet and a reduction of the
front(south) landscape buffer from 10 feet to 1.09 feet, as part of a Comprehensive Landscape
Program under the provisions of Community Development Code Section 3-1202.G., subject to
the following conditions:
Conditions of Ap�roval:
1. That a building permit be obtained for the parking lot improvements, landscaping and
building improvements;
2. That an automatic permanent irrigation system shall be provided for complete water
coverage for all required and other landscaping materials and maintained as a fully
functioning system in order to preserve the landscaping in a healthy growing condition;
3. That prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Completion all of the proposed landscaping shall
be installed; and
4. That prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Completion, awnings shall be installed on the
entrances of the south building fa�ade.
Prepared by Planning and Development Department Staff: �,.�� ���,.lM���..,
Ellen Crandall, Planner II
ATTACHMENTS:Location Map;Aerial Map;Zoning Map;Existing Sunounding Uses Map;and Photographs
Community Development Board—February 21,2012
FLD201 1- 12042—Page 7
Ellen Crandall
100 South Myrtle Avenue
Clearwater,FL 33756
727-562-4836
ellen.crandall(a�mvclearwater.com
PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE
■ Planner II
City of Clearwater, Clearwater, Florida May 201 D to Present
Duties include performing the technical review and preparation of staff reports for various land
development applications, the organization of data and its display in order to track information and
provide status reports.
■ Planner I
City of Clearwater, Clearwater, Florida December 2009 to May 2010
Assist public customers at the Zoning Counter. Review Building Permits, Sign Permits, Business Tax
Receipts, and Landscape Plans as well as Comprehensive Sign Program Applications, and Flexible
Standard Developments. Regulate growth and development of the City in accordance with land
resource ardinances and regulations related to community development. Interdepartmental and
zoning assistance. Respond as a City representative to citizens, City officials, and businesses
concerning ordinances and regulations. Make recommendations and presentations at staff level at
various review committees,boards, and meetings.
■ Community Planner
Brac�ford County, Towanda, Pennsylvania January 2008 to May 2009
Coordinates with the 51 municipalities in Bradford County and assisted them in writing
Comprehensive Plans, developing ordinances, and general public and municipal education on zoning,
land use, and ordinances. I developed a comprehensive Zoning Lexicon that included zoning maps,
districts and definitions for all municipalities with zoning ordinances. Assisted in the County Parks
Plan and in developing a comprehensive Park's book listing all the parks in Bradford County. I
assisted mapping the natural gas wells as well as printing maps and parcel data for the gas companies.
■ Intern
Pennsylvania Geologic Survey, Middletown, Pennsylvania May 2006 to September 2006
Scanned geologic maps, updated documents and assisted in general office tasks.
EDUCATION
Bachelor of Science, -Major: Geography, -Minor: Art, -Certificate: Geo�raphic Information System
SHIPPENSBURG UNIVERSITY, Shippensburg,Pennsylvania
ISA, International Society of Arboriculture, Certified Arbarist
LEED Green Associate
,y:.
_ .
__
�„ �
�"�� . � ,
� �:.
�� I
_._.''�,!�_ '� -°�-,i.Fi--- + .�` -
. , � �.�
. n ,t..
�II� .
_ ,
.�. ; . � .;.
. ...
�. �w��.:�` �:�;.�...,..�.0�':�`.a+:...,°.,.,r�°°.y -�:; �,„, _ y,,._
�;� s
View of west side of the building. View of south(front)side of the building.
�,.
� .
,
: � � �
.�.�.
' - .
. .u�""�I�!`•' `-_
,.�. �;t
��
x���,.«-����
� � �s�. ��t� �`�" s aP.
�arh�,,;.,< .+,� .�. �r`R ;�va�:� : , °: •
� :.,.. � . .:. , ..�.
�
. . -. k. . �. � $...n
� �
�, ' ' t
. . ,.e':. .. �
'�5rw::+ ':�N �q Yg{ ...'�. ..... ' .
_ .,. . Y �'+ z.,' . 3^-Y�.
View of the east side of the building. View of the subject building(middle)and
surrounding buildings.
� '
a
.r' I � �
\ � �
.ji �4 ,��y �
d �
ti
North(rear)side of building. �
1916 Calumet Street 'I
Case Number FLD2011-12042
Page 1 of 1
� * tot, r s# �' � � � � � a�: ��
�� �r '!' ° e l
�
�
�
� E
,
� �
'� ��' ... ?
. ¢. � z ?
.. ,, � � � �
� ����� �.
} ;� �. .. �� ;,�,
� �� 'Y f!IR'� �:✓� ��! F A �� � �
T a s �
� :.�7', � $# *.
,
k �
���t. � :... .
. . . .�,.,....._.,. ..
. . i . ' �c.. .r�",..ry_} ♦
� . �. . �` �'�� ���'.,,�,,.'u�"'`. . . `.
_ . , , , r '�li. .�` _ �, `;" �
.# �
� ' ..:y'y :���_. 4J .. . �,'�i4C '�1*M',S,�M 4 . w..
� ra4^4. �H�...
,
� ' '.. . . :�,..
,
Y"'s,4 . j � �
� � � �
. � : 6 °' �A�r �� .•h
K� � t��� � * ��'�
`��;� ��� �A �� � ��
�
+ � � '�
a�f �+�+n *� ���h.K � �_� ��,�,,., S . . � �� �
_ �
, • '�
+� , „i �• � :� �,� �1� '� �+d' !h
Cl�LL�lI'!L 'SI" . ��� 3 �� ;
��, °�,r,� !4 ' �i �E � e � � ,,� � .�
'I�l�t U� �4`'�° . � , - ` ��; � ��J
� 3�# '� ' it �, 5� .� � !~~ � �
.
�• `�..,al�� � , � �'� s � 3 � �,.�6��_ �'��.
.,K.�,__� ��. � '.v+ r➢
Y y'"
� - ,� ? . �^"'r°�,.. '. � '��'� I�
�i+ � ��.. _.a, - . �.�
i �:� .:, .`!U d� y"" " ....a � ,
�. � �� , . , "�� T* ` �..�» ��.. �� ' .,--•:� ,p,2
+ � n� • < < ��f. ���' �'
.
' .r - r ' F• —
.e . .� _...,..: ,- .
• J,T �;��� _ " . . , � ��� -j �1�
. . . - . N • _ ��
ti _. ., , •� , . - ` '�,��;� y '.� f ���
_( •. �. � ': � �1 •`�.
,
..� -
� � , j
_ . . . - _ - ...j I "3�-_ x,�• p �Y, f,� �
M ' � � � , � � ` ,I
�� � � ���, , �.r. I�� �
,�t � q?� +^ .! l l 6'���� ��
�'�3� ��0������ � � - , � ` 1,�, 'i�' ; , � �`"?
� ; F, ._ r��; � °,� �s �+�,...._ . �
�! �� '�� �'l,�' � � �, -.N.w ''' . r �k i i
� �"�� �� �� -- -^ - ��
Aerial Map
Owner: Robert I.Smith Jr. Case: FLD201 1-1 2042
Site: 1916 Calumet Street Property Size: 0.41
PIN: O1-29-1 5-00000-340-1 300 Atlas Page: 262A
�: �� RADCLIFFE oa w �, �
j��,. = LU ma ��TEE
QI�V� % Q � 6 � 7 L '`
� $ � � V a�� y � I
� � a
x � �` m v 01d U DR i 01 SUH TRE� �
� �* c� � � 2 I
� ° �- sure�es v~i ¢ ���1
� � `� � vu � � �u 40` � _ HA
U
SUNRFSE � � Sswn Ct FWSTIhfGS LN � r•-- � �l� � �
ll
I' � �� SurtsetGroveLn
� r . � I, �-y
� �; �:�T _ _ _ PROJECT :,-•--i—:--r� :j _
SITE .
sr �. '--�� -� ' •'� •.i
� (' • ::. .. .t7 ' � , •�F�d���.'.":I � BLY D
DR I ' .� _•��: '. ;�::1 P•-•- •!
t. , '.' — :�.-_i --_,-1
bT .. C� -�••I
�I: . y. -� g '•i , •+
i �- .�,. .�_ .I L"'E' " .1 CALUMEr �:'I Er
1 I � � ' •,� ._ � l._;='i � '�
. . .. • ��.r_.— �,��:'�
��� � .l� • •.4.� •• ••� •�� ' Cf ':.•. �' � ..� �L....7.�
'-4-,. I•� L•.� v ��-•°••. , j�
`--. i �..; ...:,. _._.�..� _, ;..�:;:
, •� I" _ —.-_-:�.1. k • , .� .
Z �. :.:,. . . � .COGAN•
(LI � �� • • •" �..�.:1dL.s'
� O LN 5 `E " . . •.. �y.. • . • fn
�s j 5 .
� 'SMER4�i0ab� . -4T ,:�.:...:.• - . ., • I
'rl ,� .�: .GENifr'C' �v�• `1
Z � � ••p�.1�'.t.Ii_�w�' . ''�`•� —"�-- ' •'1
� v � l-•_' t•� �. .,�y—.'�y�'�.? '�.r•�� RD
Location Map
Owner: Robert I.Smith Jr. Case: FLD201 1-1 2042
Site: 1916 Calumet Street Properfy Size: 0.41
PIN: 01-29-15-00000-340-1300 Atlas Page: 262A
::: - . ::j: . -• .. ;r� . - . .. .r:'' , ... Q �
. . � , Z 2
� .. •� . •� ��9$(!•�
I . .:�_:. ,�_: .�.�. . :-� �. _-.�. . :- .. _�. ::
- . :;:- . � . � . . � . �:�
. .. ,, . .: .. � . .. ' �'39�a' :��
� � N �..:•, '�'•����• . � .,. :��a�� ••�
F+ pl �Q� •�0���� .�• �
' •OA .��i 'M� • �
��B? .CA. a'M�X'S�•.•" .. . W
. �
� ° .. .�• • �•�•� ;� .•. .�.' ".fi90��- W
1780 • � , ' _
� �� . .. .. ',d'78$�� 2
1914 . . . •.1��9;
1909 IRT .. :� .: � � . -:;�BQ
1907
1912 .
1905 � • '�7r80,-
1907 . .
1908 ' ���
1903
� 1770
1904
•- .. "' .. .. .�.1750•
'' �1 AQ0
. �
Zoning Map
Owner: Robert I.Smith Jr. Case: FLD201 1-1 2042
Site: 1916 Calumet Street Property Size: 0.41
PIN: O1-29-15-00000-340-1300 Atlas Page: 262A
, • • . .•�-.-. . _
13 .. •1$•" ' " ., '.i: '. "_.
... . .. ... :,•a.,:;'' ... �
, � . , '�' _r.•, , y a
� -15-� . .1: "1�• •�aso.: i z
': ._ : _. :�. . .
�. � ::. . .. ::. �• . ;�;�, ._ . ••�. .
� •• .... . . . . .. . . .. _. :��'_� '.:s.�
. • :;:-�.-,•.�.:•' .••._•:'-: . . - •:'¢'.�� -
. ��.. . . Unincorporated '�� ' � . , �'
.t�. .
==- �� . = County 'a''"'� . : .. �
,�: : .�:;:;:
' , �. , � �i: :��•�.�-
� - :� - • �.1� ...� � •3eid.� ����. � . '
:: -- '' :: -� :�:. �'�",'� _ :z.,'. .�,.
� � � :� .. �- -- . .
Vacant o ' :�•�' ' ` ��,s ��
� . . ..
�` 3M13 31H2 •.9CKQ., . '•.3Mr. ,3W5•, •�•�s���.
3,,,8 �J �J :-. .�.�.-��.-.�. :�;. :�:.• -.._-.�..�,.-��.��'
��8? CALUI�IE7';�S,p;�' ' � �� ,�
:�.i
N '�N� � b. "'�'�. ' , g3
�� act 'n� � Contractor Office � •'-'. :'�' „w¢ •:� ��' "�0'-
1780 •• • . . a^'°4.' . . .
a^i 3ant ,iuda•' � �� . . . .�3Lo7�'�,-•�•'
sat� p� O ��• � �
�ifact rin " Unincorporated
�"� �.'o a,° , � . Count
�s�a Y
.. . , .. , . . ., , . . $
�sos �: „�,•. ,. �zaa:
.. .., . ��•. ....'�'.;:. .
3N,8 • �
1912 990NIanufacturin� .
1905 .. . • - • • •l�:
au,s 1907�.. , ���i •
.�,•
su2a 08 , •••�•
1903 �0.13 A c�c> .
1770
O1904 �z
�yl.•; " ' "' ��� .ai�e3•;' •-• �.1750•
"M14p
w
, � 1
Existing Conditions
Owner: Robert I.Smith Jr. Case: FLD201 1-1 2042
Site: 1916 Calumet Street Property Size: 0.41
PIN: 01-29-15-00000-340-1300 Atlas Page: 262A
Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project
Robert Smith
1916 Calumet Street Clearweater, FI. 33765
Table of Contents
• Flexible Development Appiication
• Comprehensive Landscape Program
• Deed
• Survey
• Map
• Pictures
• Site Plan
• Parking Study
• DRC Comments
• DRC Comment Responses
• Backup Construction Costs
• Electrical Underground Cost and Time Backup
�� -
v � Planning$Development CASE#:
LL Department RECEIVED BY(staff initials):
° rwater 100 South Myrtle Avenue DATE RECEIVED:
' Ciearwater, Florlda 33756
�
Telephone: 727-562-4567
� Fax: 727-562-4865
O SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOT RI D APPLiCATiON
O SUBMIT 14 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION-Plans and
applicatlon are required b be coliated,stapled,and folded InM sets
❑ SUBMIT FIRE PRELIMARYSITE PLAN:;Z00.00
❑ SUBMIT APPLICATION FEE$
* NOTE:15 TOTAL SET3 OF INFORMATION REQUIRED (APPLICATIONS PLUS SITE PLAN SETS)
FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION
Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project
(Revised 10.27.2011)
---PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT�
A. APPLICANT,PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION: (Code Sectton 4202.A)
APPLICANT NAAAE: Robert I Smith Jr
MAILINGADDRESS: 2030 Ri n Drive Clearwater Fl. 33765
PHONE NUMBER: 727 Q�}S-7S� FAX NUMBER: "]27 �5-7534
CELL NUMBER 727 243-6g2� EMAIL: ��� b�d�� ' � ,COTri
PROPERTY OWNER(S): ROU@I't I. Smith Jr.
List ALL owners on the deed
AGENT NAME: $ P, �,��t�LLC
MAILINGADDRESS: 615 S. Missouri Ave. Suite B Clearwater,Fl. 33756
PHONE NUMBER: ' 72']4Q.j-�FOS FAXNUMBER: ']2']�j�OS
CELL NUMBER: ']27 43Q.-$H3H EMAIL: $ �I,.COITI
B. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION: (Code Sectlon 4202.A)
PROJECT NAME: RObeI't SIIll�l prOp� PROJECT VALUATION: $10,000 to$15,000
STREET ADDRESS 1916 Calumet Street Clearwater,Fl. 33765
PARCELNUMBER(S): �],-29-1$,QQQQQ-340-1300 �
PARCEL SIZE(acxes): ,41 PARCEL SIZE(square feet): j$O14
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: See atta.ched surv
PROPOSED USE(S): �T�e]16�5�P�m8IIUfaChl�ng
DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST: 1 Relief from azkin r ' ement of 11 aces to 8. 2 Relief of front set
Speciflcally identlfy the request requirment to a11ow parking to occur. 3)Dailey occupancy will not require 11
(fnGude number of units or square
footage of non-residentlal use and all az� �e3.
requested code deviatlons;e.g.
C:1Users�smithc.BRANDES1AppDatalLocallMlcrosoftlWindows\Temporary Intemet FIIeslContentOuUook�3GFZA106�Comprehensivs Inflll ProJect(FLD)
10 27 2011.docx
Page 1 of 8
, .
reducUon in requfred number of •
� p�rking spaces,speciflc use,etc.)
DOES THIS APPLICATION iNVOLVE THE TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS (TDR), A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED PLANNED UNI
DEVELOPMENT,OR A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED(CERTIFIED)SITE PLAN? YES_ NO_� (if yes,attach a copy of the applipbie documents)
C. PROOF OF OWNERSHIP: (Code Section 4202.A.5)
X SUBMIT A COPY OF THE TITLE INSURANCE POLICY,DEED TO THE PROPERTY OR SIGN AFFIDAVIT ATTESTING OWNERSHIP(see page
7)
D. WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Sect(on 3-913.A)
O Provlde complete responses to the six(6)GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA—Explain�each criter(a is achieved,In detail:
1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony wfth the scale,bulk,coverage,density and character of adjacent propertles in which ft
is bc�ted.
The proposed development wlll be In harmony by decreasing paved coverage and Increasing 8reen area 3urrounding properties
havs very Ilttle green space.Exlsting surrounding development Is 20 to 40 y�ears old.
2. The proposed development will not hlndeF or dlscourage the appropriate development and use of ad)acent land and buildings or slgniflqntly
(mpalr the value thereof.
AdJacent land value could be enhanced with the proposed upgrades to the subJect property.Improvemerrts are site contalned
and will not hinder similar developments.
3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons residing or working in the neighborhood of U�e proposed use.
No adverse affects,safety is improved by new parking arraignment There will not be any hazardous materials(chemicals,
exptosives or combust(bles)stored or manufactured on slte.
4. The proposed development is designed to mirdmize traffic congestlon.
New parking wlil be in conformancs with the present design standards,eliminating maneuvering IMo the dght of way.
5. The proposed development 1s consisterrt wHh fhe community character of the Immedlate Ndnity of the parcel proposed for devetopment
It wlil conform to the preserrt desipn standaMs.Being the flrst property on the street to tha present code in may not be consistent
with the community character but should set the standard for future redevelopment in the area
6. The design of the proposed development minimtzes adverse effects,induding visual,acoustic and olfactory and hours of operaUon Impacts,on
adjacent properties.
New parking and landscaping schemes will Improve visual,and safety.Olfactory and hours of operatlon wlll be in Iine wlth the
surrounding community charectar.
C:IUserslsmithc.BRANDES1AppData\L.ocaMAicroso}t1WlndowslTemporary Intemet FtIeslContentOutlookl3GFZA1081Comprehensbe Inftll ProJect(FLD)
10 27 2011.docx
Page 2 of 8 •
. � WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Comprehensive Inflll Redevelopment Project Criteria)
xProvide complete responses to the six(6)COMPREHENSIVE INFILL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT CRITERIA—Explain�each cxlterla fs
achieved,in detail:
1. The development or redevelopment is o�ervvise impractlql without deviatlons irom the use and/or development standarcJs set forth in this
zoning dtsMd '
The axlsting building and improvements cannot fully meet new code requirements.Site area avallabla Is insuiflcient to allow
required parking.Rear dralnage area prevents additlonal parking.
2. The development or redevelopment will be consistent with the goals and polides of the Comprehenslve Plan, as well as wtth the general
purpose,InteM and baslc plarming obJectives of thls Code,and with the Intent and purpose of this zontng distrld
The proposed redevelopmerrt will bring a non coMorming property into general conformance wlth the basic obJectives the code,
comprehensive plan and zoning dlsMct
3. The development or redevelopment wtll not impede the nortnal and orclerly developmerrt and improveinent of surrounding propertles.
The proposed redevelopment is coMalned within the property Iines,surrounding properttes wlll not be Ilmited In thetr scope for
improvemerns.
4. AdJoINnB propertles w111 not suffer substantlal debiment as a result of the proposed development
Adjolnin�properties should be improved by the added green space and traRic safety.
5. The proposed use shall otherwise be permitted by the underlying future land use category, be compatible with adjacent land uses, will not
substandally alter the essential use characteristics of the neighborhood; and shall demonstrate compliance with one or more of the following
obJectives:
a. The proposed use is permitted in this zoning district as a mtnimum standard,flexlble standard or flexible development use;
b. The proposed use w�ould be a significant ec:onomic contributor to the City's economlc base by diversifying the local economy or by creating
jobs;
c. The development proposal accommodates the expansion or redevelopment of an existlng economic contributor;
d• The proposed use provides for fhe provtsion of affordable housing;
e. The proposed use provides for development or redevelopment in an area that Is characterized by other similar development and where a
land use pian amendment and rezoning would result In a spot land use or zoning designatlon;or
f. The proposed use provides for ihe development of a new and/or preservaUon of a working waterfront use,
A,b,c�e apply.The development proposal wlll allow a vacant property to become active agaln provlding Jobs,improve the
nelghborhood and contribute economically.
6. Flexlblqty with regard to use,lot widtl�,requlred setbadcs,height and off-street parking are justlfled based on demonstrated compliance with all of
the following design obJecUves:
a. The proposed development wlll not Impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of the surrounding propertles for uses
permitted in this zoning distrid;
b. The proposed development complles with applicabie deslgn guldelines adopted by the City;
c. The design,acale and intensriy of the proposed development supports the establlshed or emerging character of an area;
d. In order to form a cohesive,v(sualy interestlng and attractive appearance,the proposed development incorporates a substantlal number of
the followtng deslgn elements:
❑ Changes In horizontal build(ng planes;
O Use of architectural dehalis such as columns,comices,string�urses,pilasters,porticos,balconies,railings,awnings,etc.;
❑ Variety in materlals,oolors and textures;
❑ DlstincUve fenestratlon pattems; Mlnor upgrade to of the existing bullding is proposed.
❑ Building stepbacks;and
❑ DlsBnc�lve roofs forms.
e. The proposed development provides for appropriate buffers,enhanced landscape design and approprlate distances between bulldings.
A,b,c 8 e apply.Parking and landscaping buffers are proposed to bring developmerK closer to compliance wlth present City
�uldelines.No adverse affects on surroundtng propertles.
C:1Users�.smitfic.BRANDES1AppDatalLocaMAicrosofllWlndowslTemporary Intemet FlteslContent.0utlookl3GFZA108\Comprehensive Inflll ProJect(FLD)
' 10 27 2011.dopc
Page 4 of 8
i
E. STORMWATER PLAN SUBMI7TAL REQUIREMENTS: (City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criterta
� � Manual and 4202.A.21)
❑ A STORMWATER NARRATNE MUST BE SUBMITTED WITH ALL APPL�CATIONS.All applipBons that Involve addttlon
or modtflcatlon of Impenrfous surface, including buildings, must indude a st�rmwater plan Niat demonstrates compilance wNh the City of
Clearvvater Storm Drainage Destgn Criteria manual.A reducdon in impervious surface area does not qualify as an exemptlon to thts requiremenk
0 If a plan is not requtred,the narrative shali provide an explanatbn as bo why the site is exempt
� At a minimum,the STORMWATER PLAN shaA Include the following; Not applicable per BPRC meeting
0 Ex�stlng topography extending 50 feet beyond all property lines;
O Proposed grading induding flntshed floor elevatlons of all structures;
O All ad�cent streeb arid munidpal storm systems;
❑ Proposed storm�nrater detenUoNretentlon area induding bp of bank,toe of slope and ouUet control struclure;
❑ A narrative desaidng fhe proposed stormwater control plan including aA calculatlons and data necessary to demonstrate compliance with
the City manual.
0 Proposed stormwater detentloNretenUon area induding top of bank,toe of slope and outlet control structure;
O Signature and seal of Flortda Registered Professtonal Engineer on all plans and qlculatlons.
O COPY OF PERMIT INQUIRY LETTER OR SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMEIYT DISTRICT (SWFWMD) PERMIT
SUBMITTAL(SWFWMD approval is requtred prior to Issuance of City Building Permit),If applicabie
O ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF STORMWATER PLAN REQUIREMENTS(Applicarrt must InlUal one of the following):
Stormwater plan as noted above Is included
Stormwater plan is not required and explanaUon narrative Is attached. At a minimum, a grading pian and flntshed floor
etevatlons shall be provided.
CAUTION - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A STORMWATER PLAN
AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY
MAY OCCUR.
If you have questions regarding these requirements,contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at(727)562-4750.
F. SUPPLEMENTAL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Sectlon 4202.A)
x SIGNED AND SEALED SURVEY(including legal descxiptlon of property)—One orlglnal and 14 coples;
x TREE SURVEY (including extstlng trees on stte and wtthin 25'of the adJacent aRe, by spedes, size(DBH 4'or greater), and locatlon,
including drip Ilnes and IndlqUng trees to be removed)—please des/gn enound the ex/syng trees 011 Slt@ p�a11
x TREE INVENTORY;prepared by a'certifled arborist",of all trees 4'DBH or greater, reflecdng size, canopy(drip Ilnes)and conditlon of
S�a,a�;on site plan
x LOCATION MAP OF THE PROPERTY;
❑ PARKING DEMAND S7UDY in conjunction with a request to make deviationa to the parktng atandards (te. Reduce number of
apacesl. Prior to the submitte� of thie appitcation, the methodology of such atudy shall be approved by the Community
Development Coordinetor and ahall be in accordance with accepted traffic engineering princfples. The flndtngs of the study will be
used in determin(ng whether or not deviationa to the parking atandarda are epproved;Met with engineering to show
preliminary site plan. Was toid it appeared acceptable.
� GRADING PLAN,as applicable;N/A per BPRC meeting
� PRELIMINARY PLAT,as required(Note: Building permtts wtll not be Issued untll evidence of recording a flnal plat Is provided);N/A
� COPY OF RECORDED PLAT,as appllpble;N/A
C:IUserslsmithc.BRANDES1AppData\LocallMicxosoftlWirxlows�Tempordry Intemet FlIeslContent.0ut1ook13GFZA1081Comprehensive Infill Projed(FLD)
10 27 2011.docx
Page 5 of 8
�
G. SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS:(Section 4202.A)
x SITE PLAN wNh the followtng Informatlon(not to exceed 24"x 38'):
_ Index sheet referendng Individual sheets inciuded in package;2 pages
x North amow;
x Englneering bar scale(minimum scale one Inch equals 50 feet),and date prepared;
x All dimenslons;
x Footprirrt and size of all EXISTING buildings and structures;
x Footprirrt and size of all PROPOSED butldings and shudures;
X ai req�ired set��s;
x AII exis8ng and proposed points of access;
x All required slght trfangles;
X Identlflcatlon of envlronmentally unique areas, such as watercourses, wetlands, tree masses, and specimen trees, induding
descxiptlon and bcatlon of understory,ground cover vegetatlon and wtldlife habitats,etc;Locatlon of all public and prtvate easements;
x LocaUon of all street dghts-of-way wtthtn and adjacent to the site;
X Loc�Uon of exlstlng pubitc and private u�litles,Induding flre hydrants,stortn and sanitary sewer lines, manholes and Iift staUons,gas
_ and water Ilnes;
x AN parkirg spac�s,ddveways,loading areas and vehicular use areas;
x Depidion by shading or crosshatching of all required parlcing lot Interior landscaped areas;
X LocaUon of all sol(d waste contalners,recycling or trash harxiling areas and outside mechanical equipment and all required scxeening
_ {per Sectlon 3-201(D�i)and index#701};
x Locatlon of all landsppe material;
x LocaUon of all onslte and ofisite stam-water management facilftles;
x Locatlon of all outdoor Iightlng flxlures;
x Locatlon of all existlng and proposed sidewalks;and
X Floor plan typicais of buiidings for all Level Two approvals. A floor plan of each floor(s required for any parking garage requlring a
_ Level Two approval.
x SITE DATA TABLE for existing,required,and proposed development,in written/tabular form:O11 Slt@ pI811
EXISTING REQUIRED PROPOSED
x Land area in square feet and acres;
_ Number of EXISTING dwelling units;N/A
_ Number of PROPOSED dwelling units;W/A
x Gross floor area devoted to each use;
x Parking spaces: tota� number, presented tn tabular ierm with the All Ot1 Site �
number of required spaces; _Plan
x Tofal paved area, induding all paved paridr�g spaces&driveways,
_ expressed in square feet�percentage of the paved vehicular area;
x Offldal records book and page numbers of all existlng utlNty
_ �semenk
x Buliding and structure helghts;
x Impenneable surface ratlo(I.S.R.);and
x Floor area ratlo(F.A.R.)for all nonresldentlal uses. .
0 REDUCED COLOR SITE PLAN to scale(8 i4 X 11);
D FOR DEVELOPMENTS OVER ONE ACRE,provide the following additlonal IMormatfon on site plan:
One-foot oonburs or spot elevaUons on site;
_ Offsite elevatbns if reguired to evaluate the proposed stormwater management for the parcel;
All open space areas;
_ LocaUon of all earth or water rehaining walis and earth berms;
_ Lot Iines and building Ilnes(dimensfoned);
Streets and ddves(dimensloned);
_ Buildtng and structural setbacks(dirnensbned);
Strudural overhangs;
C:1Userslsmithc.BRANDESWppDatalLocaMAicrosoftlWindowslTemporary Intemet FileslContent.0utlookl3GFZA1061Comprehensive Inftll Project(FLD)
10 27 2011.docx
Page 6 of 8
H. LANDSCAPING PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Sectlon 41102.A)
x LANDSCAPE PLAN wlth the following InformaHon(not to exceed 24'x 36'):
x All exisUng and proposed structures;
x Names of abuttlng streets;
x Drainage and retenUon areas including swales,side slopes and bottom elevaUons;
x Delineatlon and dimensions of all requlred perlmeter landscape buffers;
x Sight vislbllity triangles;
x Delfneatlon and dlmensions of ali parlcing areas including landscaping fslands and curbing;
X Existlng trees on-site and Immedlately adJacent b the site,by spedes,size and locatlons,InGuding dripltnes(as Indtcated on requ�red
_ tree survey);
X LocaUon, size, and quantltles of all existlng and proposed landscape m8tertals, indicated by a key relaUng M the plant
_ schedule;
X Plant schedule wiU�a key(symbol or label)IndtcaUng the size,descriptlon,speciflcaUons,quantltles,and spactng requirements of ali
,_ exisUng and proposed landscape materials,induding botanical and common rrames;
X Typical plantlng detalls tor trees.Palms, shrubs and gro�md cover plants Induding instructlons,soli mixes, backfilMg, mulchtng and
_ Protective measures;
Interior landsc�ptng ar�s hatched arxi/or shaded and labeled and Interior landscape coverage, expresstng in both square feet and
a��e�o��;N/A
x Conditlons of a previous development approval(e.g.conditlons fmposed by the Community Development Board);
x IrtigaBon notes.
0 REDUCED COLOR LANDSCAPE PLAN to sple(8�4 X 11);N/A per BPRC
O COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM appl(ptlon, as applicabie. Landscape assoctated wtth the Comprehenslve Landsqpe
Program shall exceed minimum Code requirements to offset the areas where m(ntmum Code will not be meLN�l4 p@I'BRPC
1. BUILDING ELEVATION PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4202.A.23)
❑ BUILDING ELEVATION DRAWINGS—wifh the following informatlon:
All sides of all buildings
_ Dimensloned N/A per BPRC meeting
_ Colors(provide one full stzed set of colored elevatlons) .
Materials
❑ REDUCED BUILDING ELEVATIONS—same as above bo scale on 8�4 X 11
J. SIGNAGE: (Division 19. SIGNS/Section 3-1806)
❑ All EXISTING freestanding and attached slgns; Provide photographs and dimensions (area, height, etc.), Indicate whether they will be
removed or to remain.
❑ All PROPOSED freestandtng and attached signs; Provide detalls induding locatlon, size, height, oolors, materials and drawing;
freestanding signs shail inctude the street address(numerals)
� Comprehensive Sign Program appilcatlon, as appl(cable (separate applicaUon and fee required). N/A p@I' BPRC
meeting
❑ Reduced signage proposal(8'r4 X 11) (color),if submittlng Comprehensive Sign Program applicaUon.
C:1Userslsmtthc.BRANDES1AppDataU.ocaMAlcrosoftlW(rKiowslTemporary Intemet FilesiContent.0utlookl3GFZA106\Comprehensive Inflll ProJect(FLD)
10 27 2011.docx
Page 8 of 8
K. TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY:(Sectlon 4202.A13 and 4801.C)
O Indude if required by the Traffic Operadons Manager or his/her deslgnee or if the proposed development
■ WIII degrade the acceptable level of service for any roadway as adopted in the Comprehenstve Plan.
• WIII generate 100 or more new vehide directionai Mps per hour and/or 1000 or more new vehide Mps per day.
• WIII affed a nearby roadway segment end/or Intersectlon with flve(5)reportable accidents wltliln the prlor twelve(12)month period or
that Is on the Citys annual Ilst of most hazardous Intersecdons. •
Trip generadon shall be based on the most rec:ent edltlon of the Instltute of Transportatlon Engineer's(ITE)Tdp General Manual.
The.Trafflc Impact Study must be prepared In accorciance with a "Scoping Meetlng' held with the Trafflc Operatlons Manager and the
Planning Department's Development Review Manager or their designee(727-562-4750)
Refer to SecUon 4-801 C of the Communily Development Code for exc�pUons to th(s requlrement.
° Adcnow�edgement ot trafflc�mpaa sh,dy req��rements(,4ppucant must�ntUa�one or tne fo��owing): N/A per BPRC meeting
Traflic Impad Study Is induded.The study must indude a summary table of pre-and post�Jevelopment levels of seMce for all
roadway legs and�ch tuming movement at a0 tntersecUons IdenUfled in ihe Scoping MeeUng.
Trafltc Impact Siudy Is not requlred.
CAUTION — IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A TRAFFIC IMPACT
STUDY� AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND
SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR.
If you have questlons regarcling these requirements, contact the City Public Worics Adminlstratlon Engineering Department at(72�562-
4750.
L. FIRE FLOW CALCULATIONS/WATER STUDY:
Provide Fire Flow Calculatlons.Water Study by a FIRE PROTECTION ENGINEER to assure an adequate water supply is avallable and to determine if
any upgrades are required by the developer due to tl�e impact of thls project. The water supply must be able to support the needs of any requlred fire
sprinkler,standpipe and/or fire pump. If a flre pump is required the water supply must be able to supply 150%of its rated qpadty. Compliance with
the 2004 Florida Fire Preventlon Code to indude NFPA 13,MFPA 14,NFPA 20,NFPA 291,and MFPA 1142(Mnex H)is required.
� Acknowledgement of ftre flow calwlallons/water study requirements(Appltcant must inlUal one of the following):
Fire Flrnv Calculatlons/VVater Study is Induded.
Fire Flow Calculations/Water Sh�dy is not requtred per BPRC was told to put nearest fire hydrant
on site plan and this would be acceptable.
CAUTION — IF APpLICAT70N REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A FIRE FLOW
CALCULATIONS/ WATER STUDY AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APpLICATiON MUST BE
RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR.
If you have quesUons regarding these requtrements,contact the City Fire Preventlon Departrnent at(727)562-4334.
M. SIGNATURE:
i,tl�e underslgned,adcnowledge that all representaUons made STATE OF FLORIDA,COUNTY OF PINE4LAS
tn this appliptlon are bve and accurate to the best of my and subscribed before me this 3 D day of
knowledge nd authorize Gty representatives to Nstt and �! r" A.D.20 1� to me and/or by
P��9 e proPertY descxibed In is applicatlon. ' .who Is personalN konwn has
.
_. __ produced
as identlftqtlon �Y�
i. :� MP'COMMI8810N/DD�1987
'B�Oember 21,2018
Sigriatu of property owner or represen e Notary pu Ic,
My commi e Ires:
C:1Userslsmithc.BRANDES1AppData�Loca►W�(p�oso{tWy�ndowslTemporary Intemet FileslCont�tOutlookl3GFZA108�Comprehensive Infttl Project(FLD)
10 27 2011.docx
Page 9 of 8
_ _ _
N. AFFIDAVIT TO AUTHORIZE AGENT:
1. Provide names of all property owners on deed—PRINT full names:
Robert I.SmNh Jr.
2 That(I amhnre are)the owner(s)and record tlUe holder(s)of the following descrlbed property(address or general bcaUon):
1918 Calumet Street,Clearvvater FI.33765
3. That thls property consUtutes fhe property for whfch a request for a:(descxibe request)
Property requires a Flexible development Level 2(Sec.2-1304)review for sfte compliance.
a, That the undersigned(hasJhave)appotnted and(does/do)appoln�
Barty P.Ullmann Architect LLC
as(his/tlieir)agent(s)to execute any petlUons or other documents necessary to affec:t such petltlon;
5. That this afftdavit has been executed to induce the City of Clearvvater,Flodda to conslder and act on the above described property;
6. That site visits to the property are necessary by City representatives in order to process this applfption and the owner auU�orizes Clty
representatives to visit and photograph the property described in thfs application;
7. That(I/we),the undersf ty,her by that th foregoing Is true and�rrect
Robert I.SmNh Jr.
P�o Owner Property Owner
Property Owner Property Owner
STATE OF FLORIDA,
COUNTY OF PINELLAS
Before me the undersigned,an offlcer duly commissioned by the laws of the State of Flortda,on this �__ day of
� ✓ , �, I personally aPP�red D qcr-f' � �rh�i ►-/L who having been flrst duly swom
Deposes and says tha he fuly understands the contents of the affldavit that he/she signed.
'" � MY CaUMiS310N t DD BA1837
��3�epte►n�ber 21��
' No Publi Slg re
Notary Seal/Stamp My Commtssion Expires: �.� ;�l.b f ,_
C:1UserslsmNhc.BRANDES1AppDatalLocaMA(crosoftlWlndowslTemporary Intemet Files\ContentOutlookl3GFZA106�Comprehensive Infill Project(FLD)
10 27 2011.docx
Page 10 of 8
__.
�
� � Planning&Development Department CASE NUMBER:
p 100 South Myrtle Avenue RECEIVED BY(Staff initlals):
rwater Clearwater� Florida 33756
� Telephone: 727-562-4567 DATE RECEIVED:
� Fax: 727-562-4865
O SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION
❑ SUBMIT 14 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION-Plans and applicatlon are
required M be oollated,stapled and folded into sets �
* NOTE: A TOTAL OF 16 SETS OF THIS APPUCATION AND ALL SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION IS REQUIRED TO BE 3UBMITTED IN
CONJUNCTION WITH A COMPLETE LEVEL ONE OR LEVEL 111V0 APPLICATION.
COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGR,AM
�x��a ior��i2oii�
�PLEASE TYPE OR PRIN'!'�
APPLICANT� PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION: (Code Sectlon 4202.A)
APPLICANT NAME: Robert I. Smith Jr.
MAILING ADDRESS: ZO3O RI on Drive Clearvvater, FI. 33764 -
PHONE NUMBER: 7Z7 ��J-7S� CELL NUMBER: 727 2�-GHZO '
E-MAILADDRESS: rsmith@brandesengineerin .com
PROPERTY Robert I. Smith Jr.
OWNER(3):
Ust ALL owners on ihe
deed
AGENT NAME: Ba P. Ullmann, Architect
MAILING ADDRESS: C�rJ S. Missouri Ave. Suite B Clearwater fl. 33756
PHONE NUMBER: 72 T �Z-44OS FAX NUMBER:
CELL NUMBER: D ESS: BaRYUIlllla�'lll Q�aOI.COf11
The landscapinp requlremeMs of Article 8,Division 12, may be modifted or waNed as part oi a Level One(Flextble Standard)or Levei Two
(Flexible DsvelopmeM)applicatlon, as the c�e may be�If the appllcatlon for developmerrt approval Includes a Comprehenslve Landscape
Program� which satisfles the foilowing criterla The uss of iandscape plans, secttons/elevations, rende�ings and perspectives may be
necessary to supplement the IMormatlon provided on fhls worksheeL Landscaping assoclated with the Comprehensive Landscape Propram
shall exceed minimum Code requiremer�ts to offset the areas where minimum Coda will not be met
1. ARCHITECTURAL THEME:
a. The landscaping in a Comprehensive Landscape Program shall be designed as a part of�e archttectural Uieme of the prindpal buildfngs
proposed or developed on�e parcel proposed for the developmenl
Landscaping and green space were added to the proposed chanqes They are on the site
_plan for review and comment
OR
b. The design,diaracter, locatlon and/or mate�iais of the landscape treaUnent proposed In the Comprehenslve LancJscape Program shall be
demonstrably more altractive than landscaping ofherwise permitted on fhe parcel proposed for development under the minimum iandscape
sfandards.
Please see proposed site plan
Page 1 of 2
, 2. LIGHTING:
� My IlghUng proposed as a part of a comprehensive landscape program is automatlplly controlled so that the itghtlng Is tumed off when the
business is dosed.
A light exists on a utility pole in front of the subject property.
3. COMMUNITY CHARACTER:
The landscape treatrnent proposed fn the Comprehensive Landscape Program wtll enhance the community charader of t�e Gty of Clearwater.
It may set a standard being that most existing properties are 20 to 40 years old
4. PROPERTY VALUE3:
The landscape treatrnent proposed in the Comprehensive Landscape Program will have a benefldal impact on the value of the property in the
immedlate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development
In my opinion when the economy tums and values stabilize and/or increase yes it will enhance
the value.
5. SPECIAL AREA OR SCENIC CORRIDOR PLAN:
The landscape treatment proposed in the Comprehensive Landscape Program is consistent with any speaal area or scenic corridor plan which
the City of Clearvvater has prepared and adopted for the area in which the parcel proposed for development is located.
Not a scenic corridor. It is a dead end street with a cul de sac �
SIGNATURE:
I,the und (gned,acknowledge that all representatlons made In STATE OF FLORIDA,COUNTY OF PINELLAS
this a I Uon are trve and accurate to the best of my Svi�qm� arxl subscribed before me this ,,� day of
ge and authorize City repres fatives to visit and lJ� A.D. 20 �
P rap tt�e rty desaibed in fh pplicatlon. � who is�ally k wn�has
P uced
as tdentlflqtlon.
� NAWCYCOLE
e /00891837
Signa re of property r or re enFaUve Notary pu . Noeery pub�c�,aaw,ue,s
My commisslon I . a
C:IUserslsm/tha8R,4NDES1AppDataV.ocallMlcrosoftlWlndowslTem�oorery/ntemef FlleslContent.0utlookl3GFZA/081Comprehensl►�e Landscape
Program 102011(2).docar
Page 2 of 2
Prepared by: PINELLAS COUNTY F�ORIDART
Tiffiney L.Daniels , INST# 201117229T 061Z912011 at 11:56 AM
Rory B.Weiner,P.A. OFF REC BK:17289 PG: 2119-2119
671 West Lumsden Road DceType:DEED RECORDING: 510.00
D DOC STAMP: ;1400.00
Brandon,Florida 33511
File Number: 10-1145
S P ���U, p4� � �v General Warranty Deed
Made this June 27,2011 A.D.By Barbara A.Wortman,an unremarried widow and surviving spouse of William F.Wortman,
whose address is: 175 S.Thayer Ave,Lecanto,Fl.34461,hereinafter called the gantor,to Robert Smith,whose post office address is:
2030 Ripon Drive,Clearwater,Fl.33764,hereinafter called the grantee:
(Whenever used herein the term"grantor"and"grantee"include all the parties to this instrument and the heirs,legal representatives and assigns of
individuals, and the successors and assigns of corporations)
Witnesseth,that the grantor,for and in consideration of the sum of Ten Dollars, ($10.00)and other valuable considerations,
receipt whereof is hereby aclmowledged,hereby grants,bargains,sells,aliens,remises,releases,conveys and confirms unto the grantee,
all that certain land situate in Pinellas County,Florida,viz:
Beginning at the Northeast corner of the Southeast 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of Section 1,Township 29 South,Range 15 East,
run thence S Odeg17'48"E,along the North-South centerline of said Section 1,(centerline of Hercules Avenue) 140.03 feet;
thence N 89deg14'24"W,along the Northerly line of Calumet Street(see O.R.Book 2099,page 356,public records of
Pinellas County,Florida)855.70 feet for a Point of Beginning;thence continue N 89deg14'24"W,along said Right of Way
line, 128.67 feet;thence N Odeg45'36"E 140.00 feet;thence S 89deg14'24"E 128.67 feet;thence S Odeg45'36"W 140.00
feet to the Point of Beginning. Subject to a non-exclusive easement for ingress and egress over and across the East 10 feet of
said property and Together with a non-exclusive easement for ingress and egress over and across the West 10 feet of the
following described properiy:Beginning at the Northeast corner of the Southeast 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of Section 1,
Township 29 South,Range 15 East,run thence S Odeg17'48"E,along the Norkh-South centerline of said Section 1,(centerline
of Hercules Avenue) 140.03 feet;thence N 89deg14'24" W,along the Northerly line of Calumet Street(see O.R.Book 2099,
page 356,public records of Pinellas County,Florida)720.45 feet for a Point of Beginning;thence continue N 89deg14'24"W,
along said Right of Way line, 135.25 feet;thence N Odeg45'36"E 140.00 feet;thence S 89deg14'24"E 135.25 feet;thence S
Odeg45'36"W 140.00 feet to the Point of Beginning.
Parcel ID Number: O1-29-15-00000-340-1300
Together with all the tenements,hereditaments and appurtenances thereto belonging or in anywise appertaining.
To Have and to Hold, the same in fee simple forever.
And the grantor hereby covenants with said grantee that the grantor is lawfully seized of said land in fee simple;that the grantor
has good right and lawful authority to sell and convey said land;that the grantor hereby fully warrants the title to said land and will defend
the same against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever; and that said land is free of all encumbrances except taxes accruing
subsequent to December 31,2011.
In Witness Whereof, the said grantor has signed and sealed these presents the day and year first above written.
Signed, sealed and delivered in our presence:
��,.�'�•` �" � I,� �tyJ � (Seal)
'�-�`� ` "��r /� � / Barbara A.Wortman
Wimess Printed Name ?' �F11'r.� ( Q�"T L/" _ Address: 175 S.Thayer Ave,Lecanto,Fl.34461
� ' �� )� � (Seal)
L/�J �r/L.
WitnessPrintedName ����//' ��/C �•��'<�N Address:
State of �! r�°�`�
County of `, C; �'rv S
r.
The foregoing instrument was aciciowledged before me this ��-���day of June,2011,by Barbara A.Wortman,an unremarried widow and
surviving spouse of William F.Wortman,who is/are personally known to me or who has produced d►ivers license as identification.
,..�`�r p'.. CHRIS CARTER C.�L"J��' CJ�✓f��J
`` �� NM�ty PuDIiC•Sfile 01 HO►�d� Notary Pubhc � C�r�T � �/
�• • M�1 Con�m.fxpin=Mu 2a,ZO1S Print Name:
y'?, �` comm�::�on�►EE»ee� 3�����,� -
„Q°�„x. ��� �M. My Commission Expires: '`-'
DEED Individual Warranty Deed-Legal on Face
�
�
SECTiON . . .�. . . , TOWNSHIP . . 29 . . SOUTH, RANGE . . 15 . . EAST, . . . . . PINELLAS . . . . . . COUNTY, FLORIDA
.. .. . . . . . BOUNDARY SURVEY - --; ��- -
15' R/W PER . BASIS � BEARINGS IS DEED
S89'14'24°E TAX �IAP 128.67'R
. S�R S89'14'14"E 128.68'M s�R
.T—..�
I I � LEGAL DESCRIP110N
I �
� � � P•0•C o BEqNNIN6 AT THE NORIHEAST CORNER OF THE
'rNj N � NE CoRNER oF �E � N . SpUTHEAST 1/4 OF 1HE SOUIHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 1,
SE 1/4 OF 1HE SW 1/4 l ^ TOWNSHIP 29 SOU1H, RANGE 15 EAST, RUN THENCE S
'6� � . � � � o� s�c. t-2s-t5 J 0'17'48" E ALON6 iHE NOR1H-SOUTH CENIERUNE OF SAID
I <
. _ � � N SECTiQN 1, (CENT�RLJNE OF HERCULES AVENUE) 140.03
;r�� � � I FEET, THENCE N 89'14'24' W, ALONG iHE NORTHERLY -
E� nE ��.s2' _ � ,. , nE za.2s� E� � UNE OF CALU�fET STREET (SEE O.R. BOOK 2099, PAGE
� ,, I � 356;PUBIIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA)
�� . : ( � j � I L E G E N D 855.10 FEET FOR A POINT OF BEqNNiNG; 1HENCE
�o . �, t sr� � �, . CONTINUE N 89'14 24 W, ALONG SAID RIGHT OF WAY IJNE,
�:� � k $ c3 I o°' • - POWER POLE 128.67 FEET; 1HENCE N 0'45'36' E 140.00 FEET; 1HENCE
-- � ' � � ° � � ` � - WATER METER S 89'14'24' E 128.67 FEET; 1HENCE S 0 45'36� W 140.00
, . , �
� � � o - BROADBAND
� � I � PEDESTAL � T O T H E P O I N T O F B E q N N I N G.
l� ��;� � � I —� - G U Y W I R E F L O O D Z O N E
IL� t? r s
IJ---' ^,-�r« '� s{:�r k �5..+�n�` i� F.
CQ� ' � � � THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY APPEARS TO BE IN
'=�W� �$.. =�, �_ � � :- � � Q .
�1 '� k, � � � �; � : � I � ZONE AE (B.F.E.= 52), IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE FlRM
a � � � � _ g� �
� ��� � ; � � � � �, �IAP OF THE qTY OF CLEARWAlER, PINELLAS COUNTY,
� >� ��.� I �; � � ' BENCH MARK COb11�UNITY NUYBER 125096 (MAP NU�IBER
'� �. � " tA�L.. I � N
� � � � CITY OF CLEARWATER "I-11° 12103C-1017-H), I�AP DATED MAY 17, 2005.
� � � � ' Q � � W I ELEV.= 60.8051'
� E,,, � s� � '� I � oo N.A.V.D. 1988 PREPARED FOR
� �' � � � � ^ ,
� ': I �, o ROBERT I. SIr111H, �2.
�� F�-�'� �.� I � ° I OLD REPUBLIC NATIONAL 111LE
. � � �� � � . RORY B. WEINER, P.A
, �
[' _�� j �,`
I -� Q �
g:,� � � •� ` : F • � � ( - z CERiIFlCAlION: I HEREBY CER1�Y T01HE BEST OF UY KNOMILEDGE AND �LIEF
: : ;
1�f�� ,: .. . ' T1E ��5 (: ' .
t�s'�t ' PLANIER PLANTER p�7� ! THAT 1HE Sl�2VE'f SIiO�lt,i UN SUBSTMF�IAILY MffET'S 1HE Mq1N�IlNd IECHNICAI
a „ _ , _ ' � ' STAND �.:]HE STA1E OF fLOPoDA RULE 5�17,
�
: Ef1P' �. .' E< _ . . ;NDT D(IEND TO ANY O1HER PERSONS
�r+E ';. ,�`:� - � �: OR - 'SURVEY AND SHALL NOT BE
� � g' YAIHOUT 1HE ORIGINAL
� � V
`^` " ���� � �"' � - .. , : .: .,A F]' SURVEYOR AND AIAPPER.
�` � � � �f � � .�::r� .
I ;. y
, :
, � � I -
:�;.
��.[� �IE ... � }:e� � .
f - ������ � �14'24°W 8 5 70'R �D SURVEYOR No. 2512
�_..___.. r ° +.� I' R YOR � �IAPPER No. 6137
5 I
-� ..
k1� NdiF� - ��''��� ��� " ' ��,� � � ,... 11��1974CHED TO SURVEYOR'S REPORT.
��24 W 385.31 M
�'�� I��'��'� ' � " ���k� _ s _ , FlR 1/2' :' fl647�� .:DR1E SURVEYED: 6 9 2011
o � �� �t�a
" �' ���,-�' ��' DRAWING FlLE 060�84ADWG DATE DRAWN: 6 10 20t1
; ._ ��: �
. . . . ... �...: . � . �� .. : . _ : :' . �
. . - - . . . ... .: .. .. .. . . . . . . . .. . . , LAST REVISION: N A X REFERENCE: 060784
. . . � . . � .. . . . . .
� � ..�.��. : . . . .
_
. . .. . ..�. .: ... . � . .
���;-�-�� rt _ ON-SITE T.B.M. AND A.SSO�TES, IN��TED
. , _ � - :
�/ FND NNL �C ilN
� ���� ��� EL£V.= 50.38'
—�_r___ _ __ LAND SURVEYORS LAND PL4NNERS
_ _ _ _�_�
_—�,_ _ N.AV.D. 1988 ,?,3►0111eSOT0 BOUI.�'!�/RII, SUlT�'D
' �'`� ` 6� f�� �5�4�,T � Plld(B�RBO� FLORIll� 34683
� t LB 1834 P80N�'�7',27� �'B�5496�'.l�Y��,27J 786->256
1916 Calumet St, Clearwater, FL 33765 Directions, Location and Map � MapQuest Page 1 of 1
������'��• . Notes __ _. ._ _ _ __
Map of: ''
1916 Calumet St
Clearwater, FL 33765-1141
� _... �un�et�irov��n
; ;
, �_ ,,.__.� ,,,,..�_,.._„ _.,.
}„�
,. . �� ��sta#�st Gt
.$
mm:�
_ _n_. ��
tt � �w�'h ��
�t ''
_ �, ,,;:..�. .. ��
� . ��,..,�..��
� � £ ' �u�tn�rdal�Bhrd
�..�....._�,,;�� � �
� ,.:.�_� . _
���_, ,� � � , �.. �. .. _,�,.....W.�
� (
,.., � ��..� 43a�c1��+r � i �
���...H,, _�.0 �.��,.,.,�s ,:m
,..<. � �� n„n,» �.,,.,,,, �
� �
�
�
��� � €� �t}�`''��� ��_� � � s
_ _.,_ v. _.....
_ � � ,�, � � ,
�� �� ��� ��
� , �
� � � `; m � � � _ ���tCt '
( , , �. ___ , �
_.....���
i �F i3 �g
� I
�
� £, � . . . } .. �
. i . � � � � � . . � . � � . . �
y i�
;',��19P"�}F"::�� � ���y .
x.�« � �Cy
�.� �� �,���. �.� );��
... ����rfi*"�'i�S:;��. . � ��: ..: .
� � 500ft u
'��L 100m =�� '�� �
�..�
x. v; ' � � � _ C�2012 MapQnesk,- P �ions C�YI012 N�,�V1`�� Intermap�Tercns '
02011 MapQuest,Inc.Use of directions and maps is subject to the MapQuest Terms of Use.We make no guarantee of the accuracy of their content,road
conditions or route usability.You assume all risk of use.View Terms of lJse
http://www.mapquest.com/print?a=app.core.b59a3feb4283ecb8175696aa 1/12/2012
Front Elevation
���� ;� � ��.;
� , ��' ' � '-�
����,p A'
�` �.. ��� 4 l ���f'.
3
� � : ��j3 / �j
�� �'�� �� s zs a - � �����1�
b � � ii � �,�a�i��'� s� ��
�
ai
.; . � ��. E - r
r� �� / i
/� '�. t ,1 3� � ���� /y !� ��� .�
:�. , . . . ...
�y�''�y�'�'�3' �': ,,%�'Xf �... 3.: �P
�. y frE .: ;� �..., .
K'aF 0 y�
� �, ,� ..�: � �� �����3 � �
y
k �
� .�-�_ � ,����a��3�r +��� ���
�' �
: ' � � _. .`^� ... �x��. r �' /,�' �
y�_ � . //r..a���; . ,_ y '�� .. 1�' �
� o� z '�;� �.
�i-° � / _"� , F ,
�� \\y �j
� ' ..v.
; :..
_�
FY .,:.. . .:...._ - ;
� � �,6� � �\\, ,�^3a1.. �/ �,:
i",,,..,, ,
/
� ',:.,,:: � .,;,;,.-. ,
/
. . . . . _ . ... .... ...... .... .. ..
Rear Elevation
��,
€dn+f§� d � r��WY ev ���[N a o aila 14nu i�ju��uh��yy i,�A 3 ,
.di �a,�.
1i �
,1'r �v/ s�: �, ��, �'��-� �;
"�= �,��,' -y
"-:{' �
i �
�
/a � r,
re';
East Elevation
x ,�: ' i�� ��y � , � n� ��
� �- � � �� � �i�"'��� ' a �i
,
_
� � � � f� /�'
�' ' "' .�,,'�,�a a'�, E �� „,�;;�€ .
. .:. ,-. � � ���. � � - E �� � ��
_ � ��� ' ��b��.
^ � 3 7
v� �L 3 � �.:\ F x����N'�k�'/ `. % ' �. �
� �f6
�
��'�� �� � � ��� �� �,
� � a
. . , - i � �i i �
� i
�� � ��� � � �; ��. x:-��� � ��
E �, y % r '� �,��
:. : : .. ...:;�� ,=_k r
_. _.,,,.,xu.. , t�
. : ,.'�.,,.«N-,„W,. i, �
� �� ������� � �
�; �
i
_
,i �
II�!
1.
� �
' 3 �Ili F
_w,,.. <.n < ;
� - �n �
.e:, .,�,.:�
;
„
��..,:� � ,���,• ,
.,.
...
�'
, °
�� �r' ��„�
}�;�.�., �,:: �
�
�
�
West Elevation
3
I
�%
;� vs"'
/ �
�
�
3�
�, i.
F '
�`�". - .�.� i;
' �� .. ,_�.w�: �
�._,.
� .
«
. i. --- �K. ,.
i�:
.w+�,�. �s�:_� ��' `,�+:� �.;� ��
^�?�
rv;
.. .. . . ,� <: :;`,
� �
' ,„ n ,.,-. `���"
�.�„'"` '�.�c y
� _ � � i,�
� � ': a- � . : ' . '�'�;'t.;�
.�� ��y n4? .�:,,A
� � � ��
, ,
PARKING STUDY
FOR
1916 CALUMET STREET
CLEARWATER, FLORIDA
PREPARED FOR:
Mr. Robert Smith
PREPARED BY:
GULF COAST CONSULTING, INC.
REVISED JANUARY 2012
PROJECT# 11-051
'� " f (° '
� �' �.;7`� 9
�✓ Y }�
Robert Pergoliz i,�TCP/PTP
AICP #9023/PTP #133
I. INTRODUCTION
The applicant is seeking approval to utilize an existing vacant building located at
#1916 Calumet Street as an area for warehouse storage, and miscellaneous
fabrication, manufacturing, and assembly of inetal products such as handrails,
walkways and platforms. The 0.41 acre property is located on the north side of
Calumet Street west of Hercules Avenue and is zoned "IRT". (See Figure 1) The
redevelopment of the property is the subject of a Flexible Development
Application. This application requires an assessment of the parking adequacy for
the operation and it was detPrmined a parking study should be completed.
As part of the redevelopment a parking lot will be restriped to include a total
of six (6) parking spaces as discussed at the January 5, 2012 DRC meeting.
The building currently has 7,300 square feet of floor space. The proposed use
would operate on weekdays and would employ 2-3 total employees.
II. METHODOLOGY
Prior to conducting this analysis a methodology was established with the City of
Clearwater staf£ It was agreed GCC would conduct a paxking accumulation study
of a similar use within the same industrial park on a normal weekday (Tuesday,
Wednesday or Thursday) between 8 AM and 5 PM. The agreed to comparable
location is the Cool Walk facility located at#1914 Calumet Street,just west of the
subject site. The Cool Walk facility is located on a 0.54 acre site with 8,864
square feet of gross building area, and contains six (6) parking spaces. The Cool
Walk business manufactures, stores, repairs and distributes horse exercise
equipment. The study area included the existing parking lot only since public
parking lots and on-street spaces are not in close proximity to the Cool Walk site.
Both the existing Cool Walk facility and the vacant building at #1916 Calumet
Street are similar in size, similar in lot size, and are both facilities where
manufacturing/fabrication and storage occurs. Both sites are located in the same
industrial park and have similar trip generation characteristics with few
employees and little or no customer based traffic.
Per Section 2-1302 of the Community Development Code there is a minimum
parking requirement of 1.5 spaces per 1,000 square feet of gross floor area for
both manufacturing uses and warehouse uses. According to strict interpretation of
the code, the 7,300 square foot building would require 11 parking spaces. The
code provides for reducing the required number of parking spaces to recognize the
special situations that exist. The Community Development Code allows a
reduction in parking if the property will require fewer parking spaces per floor
area than otherwise required due to unique operations and a significant portion of
the building is used for stora�e or non-parking demand-generating purposes. The
applicant believes the proposed uses are specialized such that parking needs will
be reduced.
1
� .� ' ��'"_ �r 1 ',��.+-C� �T� _
' � �r �w' `�. �.�:. .�._ '� ,n..y, � iF ,m m �.-a n
'yG p ',� �. * �,a�.; c -
�� y'�"�'`�, � � �� � .
. �
S
� , �t, 1 _� • : � . .
� � ... �._r ( " . _ �7�
.r: `. d ° +G�. � ' 1� " � �..,` ._ ;1 'd, ��„ F �,y�,
n o J �� . c t. t .
M x M�',�#' �-.� ' I ,° �¥� n� ,..¢ ���� �
i i
, ..
x
� �
� . ....� . � .i
. '
� ,, i�� � A = � "�'-_�' �r �� "� ]��,�.�
�
�; 1.�; Z��� S �a �� €• ' 1���W k7!
„�♦ 'd , :: .>
� x
- ���� � �. . , ti ��
�, .. w ' ' �_ .R -.- . � .- _ ." _..�
. w.�: �.• . .
- . . j . s,� Is _ � � � � ,� •�-s^ _ ...r,�y,�y7.,,w�i y
.. . . •
..... �l�qrn. ._.. ...._ � _
� r �� _ �
* `� {(! «.. .��� '' � �..�s�-� - �.
' �� '.�1�. x 1. , .'!Wiv'� R .:'ai'd.9e ����i; .�-���� ...X.�.F!y � '...1
� � .
s ' �
y, � �
P r
,.. s �,�M ��I�. �.. .. '. , " S_I � - 4. �!}•
...�r� - � f
� ;�+ � � L !' f _ u ?.. .,�F -
.�. {, , r �'.
�� p' .
'�. �Q �.i: _��.- L� � � f 7� .r..� � i b .:,i� � ,'� t•�'^� `� y, �.
-- � �'` ��� �. � , '
— 1 i ~. `�v * d ` �./}i�.� � ±:,t� l'�,x�.l'.L,.
4' a '�� ��ti _ p •� ,�,_. }�;
.
.
, , y
� r ' „x -' ve-�� �
�Fxy�.�, t ` �."� � j i s � q' 1� � i a
z k'�;�� t ��R��.�..°.!-� r . :'$t�a rfd ..'I
'11 � � , �` � ,� ��+� � , M�L ,� —� '�
�t _
1 ;
u .. •�� �� � +� y�K�:�q�• � •�
sl . .,.� , ' • - � ^, i. �1 � � ���� �NY;4.:.fd�' ..n.
.. . , �� t � ..
� _' �A _ b 1 J-'R' .� �f4,�� �
N
' " � , . ��,. :. � ... -
� � � s
� '. t _
� ., 4 t.syn I�1� ' { .
� X"zmM,y��l'�y . «
^ � t I
� _
, � � �M1.. •'. . - � � _,.:
Y ��
,�
� i
} � _
y, M' k _ F��"'n'�..�'�', `.�,,:�� + r �� .�5 tiyY a ,
. � .
. .. q
� * _ �' f� �
�s �� �. +� ,.i :f'Fq 1 P i.� �..�,�.+d... .�}. ..'��_' ,A1�.xr.�rw�,,
� �� � �
" ' ' � µ` n� � ��., � �^I�� K' ' �
19*q'�",. - �� �5
.r.j ��. 6� r � �, �
� ��'E .�� � : — � _ e, =s�,'.�`� ;�
, ,
. � ' '.. � � .�,� • Ni y���
` � " " j � '1"�
...?.. . ,.. " � ' �" � . �
y . .. ' , . .. .
-
t . . � " n
._ .__ � . — � t �
'�� ��.'."°'14,;:. ' (I��. -� �, .- � . "�• --►•:�� ::� '� ;� ,� 1.. �, ,
' i� �.��.�,� ��, �J��` �-Xa"�.��- rr:�; !�C1�Y .'� n ' 1 �n n.
�'x r rrrn' ,,s � .�,
.. � ._ j- � ^ `� .
7 ,� {{�
�' , ' �'r�, " � .���i �ar�•-�o - • ,
. . ....,_ ..
,�k M� � .
,. � � „�'�i . � �.
, , , � -�-��...�--- .
� � '�`� " , , � , �'!�"i' °';' , , i �' - � ��:
' r�, �,t�+u
�� a �d
� � � � , � r �- x
, ��:o
�,< _ ! � , ya .. �rr_. ' , r � ..- �• t �� ",r,,
r r : . � � r� a '��,;: :�'�.; �. � � � �
ni �
n a �
i ,'; '� �, `� � n�, � i� i f' ...
, e �` .
.� '� i � � . - 'y. ,7�. �� �
A � '�� 5 1 fi*� �I � �,� �`1`'�„�, .w..+ . ..'..�� '.,,� ` . I�,,.
• °p� �• �;, �� �:;%�� .
; r �
� � -�• - r� �'�^`�:�:� ,�� '�- .4��:...y�ri,>
.` . .
�.�.� �, r a ' ' '� ' � .
� r�ir .. .�� �t�~f � t� � �H
';,i -s� F.. . �-.._..�.�o ty;�:�� � , �'Vr�' �s F,.!�. ' , � .� ��
»� P ��L s '� � �
¢ �,�• j`�� y� "'+ ��,"r ,� ' """ ' "'� P,:.r,-' `"'C."�'� `�:°'�4 4 � �/��. L
�.. . � . .
J'., ' + � '�'�`" r� �.w.0 a - , '�� *4
, c
� � .��kr H . 'Y `�JY�A �', + � ^ .. �_ •t� ■/ V:; ' M
i � ( ' � ' ' =�
a , ,g �' i.. ^4-�°`,,,�: � �... ��. � � � {�. .... � - ` �i;�
�• �r �"'s�t ��"f � �� - �{ .°:��.y'171�` "' . S.t �i.i• t� �f��•� tS•. y,�+ .. ,� #♦
� °+�,�q*`,- + �l� P *d� � "L•��! ��'��''� ' '��'+ r�
, a
, ,
� �y �, : � �,.t•.` r +'.1 R� :.�� �i���yy�' ���, t� i � � '*_ -ti:.,�..�`,� .� .F. � a. �a�,x'.
,�jr \ L.r� ( [�
� ?i1"4 � ,�1�i'�° ��'�.s_-.-ti` � 'r�� � 11 ' �^ 4
� y j � , =� I' r � 1 —�. ,. ��; �! � � �;� Z.. .-�.,n� }�.r
� � ��' ti•'a� h c"' ..��� ��, �� �' t,a f�,.
� j 4�'"" ��. �` 3 �C'� '�$', �7��i i;, �� jea!�,±
t'� ,� � !
� t .�� �+' `:'�\ Fr'r._ ,�3 ��! ' "i.� "��r':�w.. ! . " F��b
0
' PROJECT LOCATION P�oJECrNO:
� 11 -051
� DATE: FIGURE:
° Gulf Coast Consulting, Inc. 1 2�2 01 1
"��M Land Development Consulting
ENGINEERIlVG TRANSPORTATTON PLANNAiG PERMITTING
� 13825 ICOT BLVD.,SLJITE 605
� Clearwater, Florida 33760 DRAWN BY:
� Phone: (727)524-1818 Fax: (727)524-6090
'� www.gulfcoastconsultinginc.com M K C
5
z
>'
III. EXISTING PARKING CONDITIONS OF COOL WALK
Existing conditions were established by conducting parking lot counts between
the hours of 8:00 AM and 5:00 PM on Tuesday December 13, 2011. The existing
Cool Walk paxking lot was checked on the hour for the number of spaces that
were occupied. The number of occupied spaces was noted and an hourly
accumulated total was obtained.
Tuesday December 13, 2011
On Tuesday December 13, 2011 paxking demand was relatively low throughout
the day from a low of 0 occupied spaces (0 %) at 8 AM to a peak demand of two
(2) occupied spaces (33%) between 12 Noon and 3 PM. Table 1 provides an
hourly tabulation and Figure 2 provides a graph of hourly parking space
occupancy.
Based on the data collected the Cool Walk facility has an actual parking demand
of 0.23 spaces per 1,000 square feet of floor area. This ratio (2 spaces / 8,864 s�
may be transferred to similar uses in the area. As such, the estimated parking
demand for #1916 was calculated at two (2) parking spaces based on square feet
of floor area. Given the proposed use would have 2-3 employees, it is reasonable
to expect the parking demand to be three (3) spaces at a minimum with maximum
demand of five (5) spaces.
IV. FUTURE CONDITIONS WITH REDEVELOPMENT
The proposed modifications would result in six (6) on-site parking spaces. The
site would require 11 parking spaces according to strict interpretation of the code.
Using the data obtained from a comparable site and assuming employee load the
maximum demand for the proposed use at #1916 would be between three (3) and
five (5) spaces, and an additional space would be available for overflow if ever
needed. Therefore, the construction of the parking lot to contain six (6) spaces
will still provide adequate parking for the proposed operation at this site.
V. CONCLUSION
This analysis was conducted in accordance with a specific methodology
established with City of Clearwater staff. This analysis demonstrates a maximum
of two (2) parking spaces were occupied during any hour of the study period at a
comparable site. As such, the parking demands for a metals products storage,
manufacturing/fabrication and assembly facility were estimated to be between
three (3) and five (5) total spaces and are easily satisfied with the proposed
parking supply. With the redevelopment of site providing a parking supply to six
(6) spaces, the parking demands of the proposed use can be accommodated.
2
TABLE 1
TUESDAY DECEMBER 13, 2011
COOL WALK PARKING LOT
TIME OCC. TOTAL % OCCUPIED
8:00 AM 0 6 0%
9:00 AM 1 6 17%
10:00 AM 1 6 17%
11:00 AM 1 6 17%
12 NOON 2 6 33%
1:00 PM 2 6 33%
2:00 PM 2 6 33%
3:00 PM 2 6 33%
4:00 PM 1 6 17%
5:00 PM 0 6 0%
FIGURE 2 -TUESDAY DECEMBER 13, 2011
6 ��� �� ��' � _ � ,
b.r
( �^�' S t .,n
3 #4` �'` �,� +� b
� 4� h h X'� . "
T`' '� 3� �� � P� �b ��
C.!
5 " `� � �
�
4 ��
- .� ;_
�� � h. : � � ,. �
fA '. y 5
VI
W M1 �. i ; '�. � Y
¢^�z J }
U � t �"�' 4. 1 �'�S� t �
� .��.�SY�"�,�,�� # �4 � . Y r ,� 3 ��,.�^� � g, �r� �,
N � , t '� � � � � , F f i:
j. ,_
a r , _ �; ; �."$ a:� }
A ,� k �i J
R t y d '�.. a .i h i �..3'
W 3 S . � � —�—Series1
(�j `E � � ,�
C� c�, ' � � �
O � ���
�u ,�....0 �� � r �� �
�, F c r x�:� �.-�°� � k:, , 4�,,>^� , }" v
2 2v z
�, � � �� � � k �
..
� � a�� _ � � , �
r� �� � � �, � �
_ �F �'t � �!'-S R �,� ;.
Z f
. �..�.�;w�1t � �,� .��k�,a q i t� .7 .r r ; � � i �# �� M",� ,..,x-x x ° � `�,� �
y �S{ 3
1 � ° � � � � �'�
i P �� �'�s+� '4 t�'a,� s � �. r 3 5 �-a t`�
� �.� �� '"7 �1�'�'',�.'� '�p- `�' � �� � � a re.�. g � y � �+`���. p �''��*"" ``e�: ``'��.a F; i�" »� `�
; � S h� ti�:i� s �" � � E a Y`,s"§���aaa. w{� t �'�'har-t �Y
,� �,. � 3 � v� �i � ��r r � �^s �k �t�. i .
�'�' � b � �� � � } t- „� � �°�i�7�7 : ��,. � � ��� �Y �i�
` �° � `� ,s�z �,� .: o ��. � � h � �," �''�� �� x '`��.7 _
_ - z.��� '� g�, a: ;�' � „�, e �v,u � : 7.
kTt P> �° � � :kt ?n 4 y.
yi+`�.S..S� � �,<< � .µ 1�.1� V
. _.. . ., �. . :
. �
' � . . _ . .s' � � `` ��
Oi }
8:00 AM 9:00 AM 10:00 AM 11:00 AM 12 NOON 1:00 PM 2:00 PM 3:00 PM 4:00 PM 5:00 PM
TIME OF DAY
APPENDIX A
--- .�._a _ ,
�-----
�__.____._______ .
Page 1 of 2
Robert Pergolizzi
From: EIIen.Crandall@MyClearwater.com
Sent: Thursday, December 08, 2011 4:19 PM
To: Robert Pergolizzi
Subject: RE: 1916 Calumet Street Parking Study
The site 1914 Calumet is appropriate to study.
Ellen Crandall
From: Robert Pergolizzi [mailto:pergo@gulfcoastconsultinginc.com]
Sent: Thursday,December 08,2011 2:05 PM
To: Crandall,Ellen
Cc:Elbo,Bennett;rsmith@brandesengineering.com
Subject: RE: 1916 Calumet Street Parking Study
Methodology Confirmation:
I spoke with Benett Elbo earlier then spoke with my client Mr. Smith.His proposed use for the#1916 Calumet
building is warehouse storage and miscellaneous fabrication,manufacturing and assembly of inetals produsts such
as handrails,platforms,and metal walkways.He intends to have 2-3 employees at this 7,200 sf building including
himself.
The study site at#1914 "Cool Walk"is also fabrication,assembly and storage of horse excersize carousels."The
building is similar in size at 8864 sf.
Bennett and I agree that this is a comparable use since both sites contain manufacturing/fabrication and storage.
Both sites have
similar trip generation characteristics(employee based not customer based)and the CDC parking requirements for
both manufacturing and warehouse,is 1.5 spaces/1000 square feet gross floor area.
Bennett requested we do a mid-week day(Tuesday,Wednesday or Thursday)for our 8 AM-5 PM data collection,
which we agreed.
I will have the report completed/submitted by Monday 12/19. Thank you.
Robert Pergolizzi,AICP,PTP
Gulf Coast Consulting,Inc.
13825 ICOT Boulevard, Suite 605
Clearwater,F133760
Phone: 727-524-1818
Fax: 727-524-6090
Cellphone: 727-644-2695
email:pergo@gulfcoastconsultinginc.com
From: El1en.Crandall@MyClearwater.com[mailto:Ellen.Crandall@MyClearwater.com]
Sent: Thursday,December 08,2011 1:11 PM
To: Robert Pergolizzi
Subject: RE: 1916 Calumet Street Parking Study
Planning has some questions for Traffic and we will let you know our determination as soon as possible.
Ellen Crandall
__ _ , --- _.
From: Robert Pergolizzi[mailto:pergo@gulfcoastconsultinginc.com]
Sent: Thursday,December 08,2011 11:38 AM
To: Crandall,Ellen;Elbo,Bennett
12/9/2011
Page 2 of 2
Cc:rsmith@brandesengineering.com
Subject: 1916 Calumet Street Parking Study
Hello-We have found an alternate site that can be studied,it is a facility locate at#1914 Calument around the corner from the subject
site.The business is Cool Walk,and they manufacture and store horse wallcing carousels. I went by the site today. The site is 0.�4
acres and has an 8864 sf warehouse building. The site has 6 paved parking spaces in front of the building and a loading dock.
My plan is to perform hourly observations on a normal business day from 8 AM- 5 PM.Use the actual data to calculate a parking
ratio per 1000 sf and apply that to the subject site with 7,200 s£I will put the results into a report and submit by Monday 12/19.
Robert Pergolizzi,AICP,PTP
Gulf Coast Consulting, Inc.
13825 ICOT Boulevard, Suite 605
Clearwater,F133760
Phone: 727-524-1818
Fa�c: 727-524-6090
C ellphone:727-644-2695
email:pergo@gulfcoastconsultinginc.com
12/9/2011
ZONING DISTPICTS §2-1302
Clearwater or negatively impacting the safe and
efficient movement of people and things within
the City of Clearwater.
Section 2-1301.1. Maximum development potential.
The Industrial, Research and Technology District ("IRT") may be located in more than one land use
category. It is the intent of the IRT District that development be consistent with the Countywide Future
Land Use Plan as required by State law. The uses and development potential of a parcel of land within
the IRT District shall be determined by the standards found in this Development Code as well as the
Countywide Future Land Use Designation of the property,including any acreage or floor area restrictions
set forth in the Rules Concerning the Administration of the Countywide Future Land Use Plan, as
amended from time to time. Development potential for the Countywide Future Land Use Designations
that apply to the IRT District are as follows:
M¢ximum Duernight
Maximu�n Floor Area Ratio/ Accommodations
Imperuious Surface Ratio Units Per Acre *
Overnight Overnight Non-Residential Base Alternative
Countywide Maximum Accommoda- Accommoda- Uses
Future Land Use Dwelling Units tions tions
Designation per Acre of Land (Base) (Alternative)
Industrial Lim- N/A FAR.65/ISR.85 FAR 1.5/ISR.85 FAR.65/ISR.85 50 [subject to 75 [subject to
ited master develop- master develop-
ment plan re- ment plan re-
quirements in quirements in
Section 2.3.3.6.1 Section 2.3.3.6.1
of the of the
Countywide Plan Countywide Plan
Rules] Rules]
Industrial Gen- N/A N/A N/A FAR.75/ISR.95 N/A N/A
eral
(Ord. No. 7926-08, § 9, 7-17-08; Ord. No. 8043-09, § 17, 9-3-09)
Sectioaa 2-1302. l�inimu� standard development.
The following uses are Level One permitted uses in the Industrial Research and Technology "IRT"
District subject to the minimLUn standards set out in this section and other applicable provisions of
Article 3.
Table 2-1302. "IRT"District Minimunz Stand¢rd Developme�zt
Min. Lot
Area Min. Lot Mi�a. Setbaclas Max. Height
Uses (sq.ft.) Widtlt (jtJ (ft.) (ft.) Min. Off-Street P¢rki�zg
Fro�at Side l
Rear
Accessory�wellings 5,000 50 20 15 50 1/unit
Governmental Uses(1) 20,000 200 20 15 50 3/1,000 SF GFA
Indoor Recreation/Entertainment(2) 20;000 200 20 15 50 I 5/1,000 SF GFA or 5/1ane,
2lcourt or 1lmachine
�� ManufacturinQ(3) 20,000 200 20 15 50 1.5/1,000 SF GFA
Offices(4) 20,000 200 20 15 50 3/1,000 SF GFA
Supp.No. 25 CD2:109
§ 2-1302 COMNUNIlY DEVET�p1�Z�,�j 1^C��E
Table 2-1302. "IRT"District Minimum St¢ndard Deuelopment
Min. Lot
Area Min. Lot Min. Setbacks M¢x. Height
Uses (sq. ft.) Width(ft.) (ft.J (ft.) Min. Off-Street P¢rking
Front Side/
Rear
Outdoor Storage(accessory use)(5) n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a
1 per 20,000 SF land area
or as determined by the
Parks and Recreation Facilities n/a n/a 25 10/20 50 community development
coordinator based on the
. ITE Manual standards
Publishing and Printing 20,000 200 20 15 50 3/1,000 SF GFA
Research and Technology 20,000 200 20 15 50 2/1,000 SF GFA
Restaurants(6) 10,000 200 20 15 50 15 spaces per 1,000 SF
GFA
Self Storage 20,000 200 20 15 50 1 per 20 units plus 2 for
manager's office
TV/Radio Studios 20,000 200 20 15 50 4/1000 SF GFA
Vehicle Service(7) 20,000 200 20 15 50 1.5/1,000 SF GFA
Wholesale/Distribution/
~� Warehouse Facility 20,000 200 20 15 50 1.5/1,000 SF GFA
(1) Government uses shall not exceed five acres. Any such use, alone or when added to contiguous
like uses which exceed five acres shall requipe a land use plan map amendment to Institutional
which shall include such uses and all contiguous like uses.
(2) Indoor recreation/entertainment uses, when alone or added to existing contiguous like uses, and
when not part of a master development plan, shall not exceed five acres. This restriction applies
when used in the Industrial Limited (IL) Countywide fiiture land use plan category.
(3) In tke Industrial Limited(IL)land use category,manufacturing shall be limited to a use engaged
in tlie manufacture, predominately from pa�eviously prepared materials, of finished products or
parts, u7cluding processing, fabrication, assembly, treatment, packaging, storage, sales and
distribution of goods, and shall not include or allow for any exterior storage or processing of
equipment or materials of any kind.
(4) Offices located in the Industrial General(IG)fiiture land use category shall be allowed only as an
accessory use, located within the structure to which it is accessory, and shall not exceed 25
percent of the floor area of the principal use to which it is accessory.
(5) Outdoor storage within the required front yard setback shall be prohibited. Such outdoor storage
areas shall be limited to not more than 30 percent of the subject lot or parcel and shall be
completely screened from view froni all adjacent resiclential zoned properties and/or public
rights-of-way by a solid walUfence sis feet in height. Items stored witlain outdoor storage areas
shall not excee�l six feet in height ancUor shall not be otherwise visible from adjacent residentially
zoned property and/or public rights-of-way.
(6) Restaurants that axe accessory or incidental to any permitted use will not require Fle�ble
Standard Development application for review. Restaura�its located in the IL future land use
category shall not exceed five acres. Any such use, aloaie or when added to contiguous like uses
which exceed five acres shall require a land use plan amendment to the appropriate category
Supp.No. 25 CD2:110
r
tirrr�r0�
a �, CITY OF CLEARWATER
��,$� �
r� '��'' aC PLnrr�vu�rc&DEVB.orMr�vr Darrax�+rrr
"�`rry,+� �� PosT Or�rc,�Box 4748,Ci.Ennwa�x,FLOxm,�33758-4748
`C�G_� v� MUNICIPAL S�RVICfiS BUILDING� 1��SOUTN MYRTLli L�VNNUE,CLLARWAI'ER,F�.oiunA 33756
a'`ATER,,� T�►.�rorr�(72�5G2-�567 Fax(72�562-4576
�•�r.0
9:30 AM
Case number: FLD2011-12042— 1916 CALUMET ST
Owner(s): Robert Smith
2030 Ripon Dr
Ciearwater, FL 33764-4753
PHONE: 7274414405, Fax: No fax, Email: No email
Applicant: Barry Uilmann
615 S. Missouri Ave. Suite B
Clearwater, FL 33756
PHONE: 7274414405, Fax: No fax, Email: Barryullmann@aol.Com
Representative: Barry Ullmann
615 S. Missouri Ave. Suite B
Clearwater, FL 33756
PHONE: 7274414405, Fax: No fax, Email: Barryullmann@aol.Com
Location:
Atlas Page: 262A
Zoning District: Industrial Research and Technology
Request:
Proposed Use:
Neighborhood Clearwater Neighborhood Coalition
Association(sp.
Presenter: Ellen Crandall, Planner II
1/3/2012 1 DRC Comments
pEQUAL EMPI,OYMLNT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACfION ED9PLOYER°
The DRC reviewed this application with the following comments:
Engineering Review Prior to Building Construction Permit:
1. As per Section 3-1701, Sidewalks required, Plan considerations, if the
remodeling of an existing structure will exceed by 50%of the assessed
evaluation of the property where a sidewalk does not exist, an applicant shall
provide for construction of a sidewalk in an easement or right-of-way. If the
property owner qualifies for an exception,the property owner shall pay a fee in
lieu of constructing the sidewalk to be used to construct a sidewalk at a future
date.
2. Applicant shall bring all sub-standard sidewalks and sidewalk ramps
adjacent to or a part of the project up to standard, including A.D.A.
(Truncated domes per FDOT Index#304.)
General Notes:
1. A submittal of an approved site plan for a building permit will require a
separate review/comments. Additional comments may be necessary based
on the responses to conditions.
Environmental Review General Notes:
1. DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional
comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit
Application.
Fire Review 1) Must meetthe requirements of NFPA-1,2006 edition Chapter 18 Fire
Department Access and Water Supply
18.2.3.2.2
Fire department access roads shall be provided such that any portion of the
facility or any portion of an exterior wall of the first story of the building is
located not more than 150 ft(46 m)from fire department access roads as
measured by an approved route around the exterior of the building or facility.
18.2.3.2.2.1 �
When buildings are protected throughout with an approved automatic sprinkler
system that is installed in accordance with NFPA 13, NFPA 13D, or NFPA
13R,the distance in 18.2.3.2.2 shall be permitted to be increased to 450 ft
(137 m).
18.2.3.4.1.1
Fire department access roads shall have an unobstructed width of not less
than 20 ft(6.1 m).
Plan shows the reduction on the east side of this building to ten feet(10')
provide details showing how the code will be maintained as no scale is listed
on the site plan.ACKNOWLEDGE PRIOR TO CDB
2) How will solid waste be handled, note: No dumpster shown on plan, all
dumpsters, and any associated screening which consists of combustible
fencing around the dumpster pad shall have a minimum separation from the
nearest building or building overhang of ten feet(10')ACKNOWLEDGE
PRIOR TO CDB
1/3/2012 2 DRC Comments
"EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND t'�FrTRMATIVE ACI'ION EMPLOYER°
.
Planning Review 1.As per CDC Section 3-1202.D.the subject property is required to have a five
foot wide landscape buffer composed of one tree every 35 feet with 100
percent shrubs along the west and north property lines. Revise landscaping to
comply with required buffers. Existing trees may be used to satisfy the
required tree every 35 feet.
2. Required trees are shade trees. However two accents ,such as Crepe
Myrtle,equal one shade and three palms equal one shade. 25 percent of the
total required shade trees may be accents and 25 percent of the total required
shade trees may be palms. In instances such as the ftont landscape area
where adequate space is not available for a shade tree accents area
acceptable.Additional trees will be not be required in the drainage swale,
however along the west property line there is ample room for the required
shade tree every 35 feet.
3.The Flexibility Criteria for a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project in
the IRT(CDC Section2-1304.C.6.d-see IRT District)includes architectural
details such as columns,cornices, stringcourses, pilasters, porticos, railing,
awnings, etc. as well as variety in materials, colors and textures, step backs,
distinctive fenestration patterns, distinctive roof forms and changes in
horizontal building plane.As the building on this property is existing and is a
single story certain details will not be applicable, however awnings over the
entrances and other architectural improvements are appropriate. Provide
appropriate architectural improvements, specifically on the front(south)
elevation.
4. Clarify and delineate on the north east corner between the drainage swale
and turF area and the pavement.
Planning Review 5. Mechanical equipment(A/C) must be screened from adjacent properties and
public rights of way.A/C may remain where it is however it must be screened
with landscaping or fencing. It may be appropriate to relocate to the west side
and screen with landscaping. Notate on plans how the mechanical equipment
will be screened.
6.As per CDC 3-912 developments not involving a subdivision, all utilities
including individual distribution lines shall be installed underground unless
such undergrounding is not practicable. Located utilities underground.
Solid Waste Review I need to see plans for solid waste services. What kind of business would
determine what level of service would be required. Then we would need to
show storage and screening of said receptacle.
Stormwater Review General Note:
DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments
may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application.
1/3/2012 3 DRC Comments
"EQvn�.EMru�Y�rrT nrm AFr-r�n7�Ac;r�onr Ersrt:o�x"
A
Traffic Eng Review Prior to CDB(Community Development Board) hearing:
1.There shall be no landscaping in the sight triangle which does not meet the
Ciry's acceptable vertical height criteria at a level between 30 inches above
grade and eight feet above grade. (City's Community Development Code,
Section 3-904).
Prior to Building Construction Permit:
1. Provide an accessible path from a building's accessible entrance to a
public sidewalk or right-of-way per Florida Accessibility Code for Building
Construction Chapter 11, Section 11-4.3.2.
2. Accessible sign detail shall be to current City standards. Use web address
provided for the current sign detail.
http://www.myclearwater.com/gov/depts/pwa/engin/publications/stddeU100-
Streets/pdf/11901.pdf
General Note:
1. DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional
comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit
Application.
1/3/2012 4 DRC Comments
°EQUAL EMPLOYMIiNT AND AFF[RMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER"
BARRY P. ULLMANN ARCHITECT
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
615 S. Missouri Avenue, Suite B • Clearwater, Florida 33756 • (727) 441-4405
January 1 �, ?.01 2
City of Clearwater
Development Review Committee
100 S. Myrtle Ave.
Clearwater, FL 33756
RE: 1916 Calumet - FLD2011 -12042
Following are responses to DRC comments of 1 /3/2012 .
Engineering Review
1 . Sidewalk not required. Cost of renovation does not exceed
50% of the assessed evaluation of the property_. See
attached documenation.
2 . No existing sidewalks .
Fire Review
1 . Access provided maximum 140 ft.. 20 ft. access road provided
as well as perpetual easement.
2 . Solid waste by City curbside pick-up of black cans . Staging
area provided. See plan.
Planning Review
1 . Trees and hedge buffer provided along west property line.
North property line has 11 existing palm trees and one new
oak tree. A waiver of the requirement of the hedge is
requested due to the entire property line abutting a Pinellas
County retention pond. Nothing is adjacent to require any
further screening.
2. Trees provided in accordance with code.
3 . Two awnings on the street face of the building are to be
provided over entrances .
4 . East corner delineated on plan.
5 . Screen fence provided for A/C unit. See plan.
6 . A waiver to allow existing overhead utility lines to remain
is requested. None of these services are being affected by
the renovations and the cost to relocate them is
disproportionate to the cost of renovations . See attached
documentation.
Solid Waste Review
1 . Previously addressed. See staging area on plan.
Traffic Engineering Review
1 . Landscaping called for on the plans meets 30" height limit
in sight triangles .
1916 C�lunet January 10, 2a12
FLD2011 -12042 Page 2 of 2
Traffic Engineering Review continued:
1a. Mar',ced accessible aisle and walk have been provided from
building to street. See plan.
2 . New sign detail provided. See plan.
4�,\���'u,.. L.3'✓
. r;,. . �Sl l„°1+'�,'�
� �� r�`� �� .
_a 6 -.s,.. "'L/� ��.���
c.n _. . s���f
• =�:�,'•. ; Barry,��.; �J�limann, Architect
Y?b � ltitp "``�� \ ��..�.� ..
\��+� a n e �.�\,i\ i .
i`` �
.A�1�,^. F - _
Robert Smith
1916 Calumet Street
Clearwater, FI. 33765
RE: Cost estimate for parking and landscaping upgrades.
Below is a scope with an estimated range of cost for the work required to fulfill the requirements
of the "Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment ProjecY', for the address listed above.
• Paving improvements (includes stripping, curb, signage)
• Sod (per the site plan)
• Sidewalk at the front.
• Landscaping, trees and irrigation.
• Canopies
• 2 pedestrian doors.
The range of cost for the above is $16,500.00 to $19,500.00.
�
A I 3817 Monroes Business Park
'� �`, €°,,` Tampa,R 33635
i��,��,d��� �;� 8 I 3-855-0048
€ .: � a ;. 727-725-0048
iax 813-855-5404
piwur.� �{6i�t� c�t �c�`itio�ra��S'er�wce """"'E'�""E�".`�"
FL Lic.#EC 0002698 OK Lic.#00134419 AR M-8499 S TAT E O F F L O R I D A C E R T I F I E D W B E
MSLIc.#17933-MC VALic.#2705-1 3 1 1 81A MDLic.#12114
Date: January 12,2012
From: Bill Cochran
To: Brandes design 8 Build Inc.
Job Name: Calumet service change
ERWIN ELECTRIC, INC.
PROPOSAL AND MASTER CONTRACT AGREEMENT
The purpose of this agreement is to communicate the standard policies and procedures required
for a Contractor or Owner to do business with Erwin Electric, Inc.
The Master Agreement will be binding for the duration of each project and renew annually unless
canceled in writing. It consists of three parts and may require additional sections per job specific
requirements.
Section 1 Scope of Work
Section 2 Terms and Master Agreement
Section 3 Payment Policy
This will become part of the contract between Erwin Electric, Inc. and the Contractor or Owner.
Review the policies and procedures, sign below and initial each page. Please execute and return
to our office within seven(7) calendar days. The Proposal and Master Contract Agreement will
become void in seven days if not accepted and returned to us.
Please advise us if you have any comments or concerns, but do not ma.ke any modifications.
Please review and be sure we have included everything required to complete your project.
On behalf of Erwin Electric, Inc., we thank you for your cooperation and look forward to a
mutually prosperous relationship.
Contractor or Owner:
Agreed to by:
Title:
Date:
� I I � Y� I 3817 Monroes Business Park
�,� �� �"i�� Tampa,FL 33635
�Gi. t � 813-855-0048
' �� 727-725-0048
�E_
fax 813-855-5404
www.Erwe�Elecaic.com
Prr�w.�r �{6i�t� & f.,,GC�ptio�ra��S'e�r�ce
Fl.Lic.#EC 0002698 OK Lic.#00134419 AR M-8499 S TA T E O F F L O R I D A C E R T I F I E D W B E
MS Lic.#17933-MC VA Lic.#2705-I 3 I 182A MD Lic.#I 21 14
Date: January 12,2012
From: Bill Cochran
To: Brandes design � Build Inc.
Job Name: Calumet service change
Scope of Work: Section #1
We have included the following:
1. Work completed Monday-Friday.
2. Electrical work as Bryan(Brandes) and Lonnie Yates viewing site
3. We will furnish labor and materials 200amp and 400 amp service underground
4. We will furnish Sch 40 conduit for under ground service.
5. We will furnish THNN wire 600 mcxn to 400/240v/3phase amp service.
6. We will furnish THNN wire 400 thhn to 200/240v/3phase amp service
7. We will furnish termination at meter can.
8. We will furnish new ground rod at service as needed.
9. We will furnish asphalt cutting approximately 60 ft.
We have not included the following:
1. Permit fees or, Utility Company Charges and Bond.
2. Cutting of asphalt only no cutting or patching of concrete.
3. Dumpster or removal offsite of construction refuse or demoed items.
4. Replacement of asphalt cut away by service replacement.
5. New disconnect or meter cans.
Project Price 200a/240v/3 phase service.............$ 4,695.00
Project Price 400a/240v/3 phase service.............$ 7,991.00
Project Price utility cost for Progress Energy....$ 6,500.00
'This is an approximate cost from Progress energy if cost runs higher Erwin Electric is not held
responsible for cost oveman of utility cost. Progress Energy will require approx. 5-7 weeks from
initial contact to perform their work.
e/9!a'.
PLANNING SZ DEVELOPMENT
February 22, 2012
u
1�1
CITY OF CLEARWATER
POST �FFICE BOX 4%'3S� CLEARWATER� FLO�,DA 33758-4748
MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING� IOO SOUTH MyRTI.EAVENUE� CLEARWATER� FLORIDA �j�j%S�7
T�L�rxocvE (727) 562-4567 Fnx (727) 562-4865
Mr. Barry P. Ullmann
615 S. Missouri Avenue Suite B.
Clearwater FL, 33756
RE: Development Order - FLD2011-12042
1916 Calumet Street
Dear Mr. Ullmann:
This letter constitutes a Development Order pursuant to Community Development Code (CDC)
Section 4-206.D.6. On February 21, 2012, the Community Development Board (CDB) reviewed
your Flexible Development application to permit 7,300 square feet of warehouse and
manufacturing in the Industrial Research and Technology (IRT) District with a lot area of 18,014
square feet, a lot width of 128.67 feet, a front(south) setback of 1.09 feet (to pavement),and
27.09 feet (to building), a side (west) setback of 17.6 feet (to building), a side (east) setback of
20.33 feet (to building), a rear (north) setback of 32.63 feet(to building), a building height of
21.5 feet (to top of flat roo fl, and six parking spaces (0.82 per thousand feet of floor area)as a
Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project under the provisions of Community Development
Code Section 2-1301.1 and 2-1304.C, as well as a reduction to the foundation landscape
requirement on the front(south) fa�ade from five feet to zero feet and a reduction of the
front(south) landscape buffer from 10 feet to 1.09 feet, as part of a Comprehensive Landscape
Program under the provisions of Community Development Code Section 3-1202.G.. The CDB
APPROVED the application with the following Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and
Conditions of Approval:
Findings of Fact:
l. That the 0.41 acre subject property is located at the north side of Calumet Street roughly 900
feet west of Hercules Avenue;
2. That the subject property is located within the Industrial, Research and Technology (IRT)
District and the Industrial General (IG) Future Land Use Plan category;
3. The site is currently improved with a 7,300 square foot of gross floor building;
4. The subject property has a lot area of 18,014 square feet (0.41 acres), a lot width of 128.67
feet (along Calumet Street);
5. The maximum allowable FAR is 0.'75, the proposed FAR is 0.41;
6. The maximum allowable ISR is 0.95, the proposed ISR is 0.65;
7. The application proposes to redevelop the building for warehousing and manufacturing and
redevelop the site with 6 parking stalls;
��y
.«r
��EQUAI. EMPLOYMENT e�NDAFF1Rh1dTIVEACTION EMPLOYER��
� �
Development Order— FLD201 1-12042 — 1916 Calumet Street
Page 2
8. The building will be 21.5 feet in height (to flat roo fl;
9. The development proposes to increase the number of off-street parking spaces from zero to 6
spaces;
10. The submitted parking demand study demonstrates that 6 off-street parking spaces will be
adequate for parking needs for the warehouse and manufacturing facility during all periods of
hours of operation; and
1 l. There are no active Code Enforcement cases for the subject property.
Conclusions of Law:
l. That the development proposal is consistent with the Standards as per Section 2-1301.1 and
Table 2-1304 of the Community Development Code;
2. That the development proposal is consistent with the Flexibility criteria as per Section 2-
1304.0 of the Community Development Code;
3. That the development proposal is consistent with the General Standards for Level Two
Approvals as per Section 3-914.A of the Community Development Code; and
4. That the development proposal is consistent with the General Standards for Comprehensive
Landscape Program as per Section 3-1202.G. of the Community Development Code.
Conditions of Auproval:
1. That a building permit be obtained for the parking lot improvements, landscaping and
building improvements;
2. That an automatic permanent irrigation system shall be provided for complete water
coverage for all required and other landscaping materials and maintained as a fully
functioning system in order to preserve the landscaping in a healthy growing condition;
3. That prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Completion all of the proposed landscaping shall
be installed; and
4. That prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Completion, awnings shall be installed on the
entrances of the south building farade.
Pursuant to CDC Section 4-407, an application for a building permit or other approvals shall be
made within one year of the date of Flexible Development approval (by February 22, 2013). All
required certificates of occupancy shall be obtained within two years of the date of issuance of
the initial building permit. The buildin�permit must be obtained within six months of the initial
permit application. This timeframe to obtain the initial building permit may be extended for an
additional six months for cause by the Community Development Coordinator. Time frames do
not change with successive owners. The Community Development Coordinator may grant an
extension of time for the Flexible Development approval for a period not to exceed one year and
only within the original period of validity.
The issuance of this Development Order does not relieve you of the necessity to obtain any
building permits or pay any impact fees that may be required. In order to facilitate the issuance
of any permit or license affected by this approval, please bring a copy of this letter with you
when applying for any permits or licenses that require this prior development approval.
� �
Development Order— FLD201 1-12042 — 1916 Calumet Street
Page 3
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call Ellen Crandall, Planner II, at 727-562-
4836 or by email at E11en.Crandall cr,myclearwater.com.
Sincerely,
f �e
��
Michael Delk, AICP
Planning & Development Director
� BAARY P.l.LMANN � ARCHITECT
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
615 S. Missouri Avenue. Suite B• Clsarwater. Florida 33756 •(727) 441-4405
January 1 �, ?. 01 2
City of Clearwater
Development Review Committee
100 S. Myrtle Ave.
Clearwater, FL 33756
RE: 1916 Calumet - FLD2011-12042
Following are responses to DRC comments of 1/3/2012.
Engineering Review
1. Sidewalk not required. Cost of renovation does not exceed
50� of the assessed evaluation of the property. See
attached documenation. �
2. No existing sidewalks.
Fire Review
1. Access provided maximum 140 ft., 20 ft. access road provided
as well as perpetual easement.
2. Solid waste by City curbside pick-up of black cans. Staging
area provided. See plan.
Planning Review
1. Trees and hedge buffer provided along west property line.
North property line has 11 existing palm trees and one new
oak tree. A waiver of the requirement of the hedge is
requested due to the entire property line abutting-a Pinellas
County retention pond. Nothing is adjacent to require any
further screening.
2. Trees provided in accordance with code.
3. Two awnings on the street face of the building are to be
provided over entrances.
4. East corner delineated on plan.
5. Screen fence provided for A/C unit. See plan.
6. A waiver to allow existing overhead utility lines to remain
is requested. None of these services are being affected by
the renovations and the cost to relocate them is
disproportionate to the cost of renovations. See attached
documentation.
Solid Waste Review
1. Previously addressed. See staging area on plan.
Traffic Engineering Review
1_ Landscaping called for on the plans meets 30" height limit
in sight triangles.
.
L_J
1916 C�lu:net
FLD201 1 -1 2042
�
January 10, 2a12
Page 2 of 2
Traffic Engineering Review continued:
1a. Mar'.ced accessible aisle and walk have been provided from
building to street. See plan.
2. New sign detail provided. See plan.
Sinc�rely,
�� � ��j�� _
�' . �/�
��Z�
Barry P. Ullmann, Architect
L_..J
�
�,<<.,.,
.����S�Q`���%, CIT� �� CLEAR�XT�.TER
:� ,�r,�.�. }
" :
1�. ���i�t, � llt7 ri ��y�sr� i Di�e��Ri �tr i i
.� ���; Pc��rOr>>� t�B�>ti +�i8,(fi� �R����rT F�rnunti�3'�S �,-�8
'-99 �-._.�,�,�``;���� 'ktc�u���?�.� 5ei�tix �s F3i ui�i�<,, I(3{l5<��riu \tli;riE �li:��:i. (,�i��z»�ieit, i�l.r�i;ir�a;3'>G
���E;;,;�+' I t:�.�:r��c»r ('2"} �t�2- i�(i� f}s (-',) 7{iZ- �5(i�
December 5, 2011
Barry P. Uilmann ��� �` � 2011 VIA FAX:
615 S. Missouri Ave. Suite B
Clearwater, FL 33756
r
RE: FLD2011-12042 -- 1916 CALUMET ST-- Letter of Incompleteness
Dear Barry P. Ullmann:
The Planning Staff has entered your application into the Department's filing system and assigned the
case number: FLD2011-12042. After a preliminary review of the submitted documents, staff has
determined that the application is Incomplete with the following comments.
�E��,U o.c/
5tf�, l
� fy�d+tcl•C�' 4�
.�d� /
�,
�5",��ur,� �.e/
stt.; �
��
1. Parking Demand Study. Please see attached description of the parking demand
study. Please schedule a scouting meeting for the Parking Demand Study with
Planning (Robert TefFt, 727-562-4539) and Traffic Engineering (Ben Elbo 727-562-
4775). If a site is requesting a reduction in required parking the Parking Demand
Study is required at the time of submittal.
2. Clarify the proposed treatment of the area on the west where the asphalt is to be
removed. Will it be landscaped? Turf, ground cover, dirt? Please be aware that all
areas must be appropriately landscaped or have turF. (They may not be open dirt).
Landscaping is used to describe certain materials such as trees, shrubs, and ground
cover. Where landscaping is required turt is not an approved material. Landscaping is
only required in the buffers, foundation, and interior island.
3. Clarify if and where curbing exists on site and where it is proposed. Please be aware
any instance where landscaping and vehicular use area abuts curbing is required.
4. Provide building height.
Section 4-1008 of the Community Development Code states that if an application is deemed incomplete,
the deficiencies of the application shall be specified by Staff. No further development review action shall
be taken until the deficiencies are corrected and the application is deemed complete. Please resubmit by
December 12, 2011 at NOON. Failure to do so will result in the application being withdrawn.
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at 727-562-4836 or
ellen.crandall@myclearwater.com.
Sincerely yours,
Ellen Crandall
12/5/2011
�����t��,t.E����t.z}s>,�L;�t� ��nA��,:ut�t�rt����: �r�`���� i���tPL{>7iat,�
Letter_Of_I ncompleteness