FLD2011-10039; 220 TULANE RD; 220 TULANE PARKING LOT REPLACEMENT t
a
�
220 TULANE RD
Date Received: 10/3/2011 3:06:47 PM
220 Tulane Parking lot Replacement
ZONING DISTRICT: Medium Density
Residential
LAND USE: Residential Medium (15
du/acre)
ATLAS PAGE: 280A
PLANNER OF RECORD:
PLANNER: Kevin Nurnberger, Planner III
CDB Meeting Date: December 20, 2011
Case Number: FLD2011-10039
Agenda Item: E. 5.
Owner/Applicant: 220 Tulane, LLC
Representative: John Mueller, Howard Civil En in� ,g LLC
Address: 220 Tulane Road
CITY OF CLEARWATER
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
STAFF REPORT
GENERAL INFORMATION:
REQUEST: Flexible Development application to permit the expansion of a
parking lot serving existing attached dwellings in the Medium
Density Residential (MDR) District with a front (east) setback of
10 feet (to pavement) where 10 feet is allowable, as a Residential
Infill Project under the provisions of Community Development
Code Section 2-304.G.
ZONING DISTRICT: Medium Density Residential (MDR) District
FUTURE LAND USE
PLAN CATEGORY: Residential Medium (RM)
PROPERTY USE: Current: Attached Dwellings
Proposed: Attached Dwellings
EXISTING North: Medium Density Residential (MDR) District
SURROUNDING Vacant land
ZONING AND USES: South: Commercial (C) District
Retail Sales and Storage
East: Medium Density Residential (MDR) District
Detached Dwellings and Parking for office and
commercial uses fronting on Drew Street
West: Medium Density Residential (MDR) District
Detached Dwelling and Vacant land
ANALYSIS:
Site Location and Existing Conditions:
The 0.41 acres is located on the west side of Tulane Road, approximately 200 feet north of Drew
Street. The subject property is currently developed with four attached dwellings and accessory
parking. The subject property has approximately 131 feet of frontage along Tulane Road, which
is a right-of-way of approximately 30 feet in width that dead ends at the north side of the subject
property.
At its meeting of June 15, 2010, the Community Development Board approved a Flexible
Development request for a reduction of the front setback to 15 feet as a Residential Infill
Community Development Board—December 20,2011
FLD2011-10039—Page 1 of 6
Development Project under the provisions of Section 2-304.G of the Community Development
Code; however, the applicant was unable to perform the work within the approved time frame
detailed in the Development Order which has since expired. The applicant is now proposing to
further decrease the front (east) setback to 10 feet where 10 feet is allowable. The primary
purpose of this proposal is to provide the current Code requirement of two parking spaces per
unit.
The property to the north is presently zoned Medium Density Residential (MDR) District and is
presently vacant. Properties to the east across Tulane Road are zoned Medium Density
Residential (MDR) District and are developed with a detached dwelling and a parking lot for the
office and commercial uses fronting on Drew Street. The property to the south at 1808 — 1820
Drew Street is zoned Commercial (C) District and is developed with retail sales and storage uses.
Properties to the west of the subject property are zoned Medium Density Residential (MDR)
District and are developed with a detached dwelling and are otherwise vacant.
Development Proposal:
The purpose of this application is to provide the current Code requirement of two parking spaces
for each dwelling unit (eight spaces proposed), rather than the 1.5 spaces per unit that currently
exist (six spaces presently provided). Due to a large healthy tree at the northeast corner of the
northern unit and the existing building locations, laying pavement for additional vehicular use
area is restricted on the west side of the parking lot; therefore, additional pavement is proposed
on the east side of the parking lot which will be within the required front setback. To achieve the
desired number of parking spaces, the applicant has proposed a front (east) setback of 10 feet.
For this reason, this application is being processed as a Residential Infill Project since the
attached dwelling use in the MDR District does not afford such flexibility to the front setback.
Other proposed modifications to the existing parking lot include adding pin-curbs and curbs
around the edge of the parking lot, placing wheel stops in each parking stall, expanding the throat
of the driveway to 26 feet, constructing ADA compliant ramp, sidewalks, and parking space as
well as adding some shrubs and shade trees in the front perimeter landscape buffer and along the
northern edge of the parking lot.
Densitv: Pursuant to the Countywide Future Land Use Plan for the Residential Medium (RM)
land use category and Community Development Code (CDC) Section 2-301.1, the m�imum
density of 15 dwelling units per acre would allow for a maximum of six dwelling units on this
parcel. There exist four dwelling units on the property (9.756 dwelling units per acre), which is
consistent with the Code provisions.
Impervious Surface Ratio (ISR): Pursuant to the Countywide Future Land Use Plan and CDC
Section 2-301.1, the maximum allowable ISR is 0.75. The proposed ISR is 0.45, which is
consistent with the Code provisions.
Minimum Lot Area and Width: Pursuant to CDC Table 2-304, there is no minimum required lot
area or lot width for a Residential Infill Project. However, for a point of comparison, the
minimum lot area requirement for attached dwellings is 10,000 square feet. The existing lot area
for this parcel is 17,986 square feet (0.41 acres). For comparative purposes, the minimum lot
Community Development Board—December 20,2011
FLD2011-10039—Page 2 of 6
width requirement for attached dwellings is 100 feet. The lot width along Tulane Road is
approximately 131 feet. The proposal exceeds these comparative Code provisions for attached
dwellings.
Minimum Setbacks: Pursuant to CDC Table 2-304, the minimum front setback for Residential
Infill Projects can range between 10 —25 feet. The minimum side setback can range between 0—
5 feet and the minimum rear setback can range between 0 — 10 feet. It is noted that for attached
dwellings, the minimum required front setback is 25 feet, the minimum side setback is five feet
and the minimum rear setback is 10 feet. The proposal exceeds both the minimum side and rear
setback requirements. The design of the proposal includes the location of the expanded parking
lot at a front setback to the Tulane Road property line of 10 feet. The purpose of this proposal is
to provide the current Code requirement of two parking spaces per unit. However, the width of
each standard parking space is greater than the required 9 feet. Pursuant CDC Section 3-1402,
off-street paxking spaces at a 90 degree angle shall be 9 feet by 18 feet unless it is found
necessary to alter the parking space dimensions for safe and efficient vehicular movement
particularly where columns, walls, or other site conditions impede maneuverability or vision. No
such obstruction exists on site at the driveway or parking lot; therefore Staff, recommends that
each parking space other than the handicap space meet the standard parking space dimension.
For this reason, Staff recommends a reduction to the front (east) setback at 12 feet rather than the
requested 10 feet setback to existing pavement.
Maximum Buildin��Height: Pursuant to CDC Table 2-304, the maximum allowable height for a
Residential Infill Project (and attached dwellings) can range between 30 — 50 feet. The height of
the existing one-story residential building is approximately 10 feet to the midpoint of the pitched
roof, which is less than the allowable height.
Minimum Off-Street Parkin�: Pursuant to CDC Table 2-304, the minimum required parking for
a Residential Infill Project (and attached dwellings} is two spaces per unit. The purpose of this
application is to upgrade the site from 1.5 spaces per unit (six spaces existing) to the current
Code requirement of two spaces per unit (eight spaces). One of these spaces will be a handicap
space meeting Code requirements. The existing driveway is also being widened to the required
24-foot width.
Si�ht Visibility Triangles: Pursuant to CDC Section 3-904.A, to minimize hazards at the existing
driveway on Tulane Road, no structures ar landscaping may be installed which will obstruct
views at a level between 30 inches above grade and eight feet above grade within 20-foot sight
visibility triangles. The proposal was reviewed by the City's Traffic Engineering Department
and found to be acceptable.
Utilities: Pursuant to Section 3-912 of the Community Development Code, for development that
does not involve a subdivision, all utilities including individual distribution lines shall be
installed underground unless such undergrounding is not practicable. The civil site plan for this
proposal shows that overhead utility lines have been placed underground as a condition of
approval for the dumpster enclosure (FLD2009-06019), in conformance with this Code
requirement.
Community Development Board—December 20,20l 1
FLD2011-10039—Page 3 of 6
Landscaping_ Pursuant to CDC Section 3-1202.D, there is a 10-foot wide perimeter buffer
required along Tulane Road. The proposal will meet this required perimeter buffer by providing
a 10-foot wide area that will be planted with a hedge and a shade tree on both sides of the
driveway for screening of the parking area. No additional landscaping is required since the cost
of the project is less than 25 percent of the value of the principle structure and that the parking lot
area is less than 4,000 square feet.
Solid Waste: A dumpster enclosure on the subject property serves the attached dwellings as well
as the the commercial uses to the south (approved through FLD2009-06019). The applicant has
proposed no changes to the existing method of waste collection. The proposal has been found to
be acceptable by the City's Solid Waste Department.
Code Enforcement Analysis: There are no active Code Enforcement cases for the subject
property.
COMPLIANCE WITH STANDARDS AND CRITERIA:
The following table depicts the consistency of the development proposal with the standards of
the Residential Medium (RM) future land use plan category and the Medium Densiry Residential
(MDR) District as per CDC Section 2-301.1 and Table 2-304:
Standard Proposed Consistent Inconsistent
ensity 15 dwelling units per acre 9.756 dwelling units per acre X
(ma�cimum of 6 dwelling units) (4 dwelling units)
Impervious Surface 0.75 0.45 X
atio
Minimum Lot Area N/A 17,986 sq.ft.(0.41 acres) X
Minimum Lot Width N/A 131 feet X
Minimum Setbacks Front: : 10-25 feet East: 10 feet(to pavement);25 X'
feet(to existing building)
Side: 0-5 feet North: 8 feet(to pavement); X
28.8 feet(to existing
building)
South: 24.9 feet(to existing
building)
Rear: 0-]0 feet West: 15 feet X
Maximum Height 30-50 feet 10 feet X
(to mid-point of pitched roo fl
Minimum 2 spaces per unit(8 parking spaces) 8 parking spaces X
Off-Street Parking
� See analysis in Staff Report
Community Development Board—December 20,2011
FLD2011-10039—Page 4 of 6
COMPLIANCE WITH FLEXIBILITY CRITERIA:
The following table depicts the consistency of the development proposal with the Flexibility
criteria as per CDC Section 2-304.G (Residential Infill Project):
Consistent Inconsistent
1. The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development is X
otherwise impractical without deviations from one or more of the following:
intensity;other development standards.
2. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a residential infill X
project will not materially reduce the fair market value of abutting properties.
3. The uses within the residential infill project are otherwise permitted in the district. X
4. The uses within the residential infill project are compatible with adjacent land uses. X
5. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a residential infill X
project will upgrade the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development.
6. The design of the proposed residential infill project creates a form and function X
which enhances the community chazacter of the immediate vicinity of the parcel
proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole.
7. Flexibility in regard to lot width,required setbacks,height,off-street parking access X
or other development standards are justified by the benefits to community character
and the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of
Clearwater as a whole.
COMPLIANCE WITH GENERAL STANDARDS FOR LEVEL TWO APPROVALS:
The following table depicts the consistency of the development proposal with the General
Standards for Level Two Approvals as per CDC Section 3-914.A:
Consistent Inconsistent
1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, X'
coverage,density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located.
2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage development and use of X
adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof.
3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons X
residing or working in the neighborhood.
4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. X
5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the X
immediate vicinity.
6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including X
visual,acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts on adjacent properties.
SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION:
The Development Review Committee (DRC) reviewed the application and supporting materials
at its meeting of November 3, 2011 and deemed the development proposal to be legally sufficient
to move forward to the Community Development Board (CDB), based upon the following:
Findin�s of Fact. The Planning and Development Department, having reviewed all evidence
submitted by the applicant and requirements of the Community Development Code, finds that
there is substantial competent evidence to support the following findings of fact:
1. The 0.41 acres is located on the west side of Tulane Road, approximately 200 feet north of
Drew Street;
Community Development Board—December 20,2011
FLD2011-10039—Page 5 of 6
2. The subject property has approximately 131 feet of frontage along Tulane Road;
3. The site is currently developed with four attached dwelling units;
4. The proposal is to provide two parking spaces per dwelling unit (eight parking spaces),
rather than the 1.5 spaces per dwelling unit under prior regulations (six spaces);
5. The proposal includes a reduction of the front (east) setback to 10 feet where 10 feet is
allowable;
6. The front (east) setback shall be set at 12 feet rather than the requested 10 feet since no
columns, walls, or other site conditions impede maneuverability or vision exist on site that
would permit a revision to the standard parking space dimension of 9 feet by 18 feet;
7. The proposal exceeds the required 10-foot wide perimeter landscape buffer along Tulane
Road;
8. The property owner has undergrounded the overhead utilities within the Tulane Road right-of-
way;
9. A dumpster enclosure that serves the commercial uses to the south (approved through
FLD2009-06019), as well as these attached dwellings, has been constructed in the southeast
corner of the property; and
10. There is no active Code Enforcement case for the subject property.
Conclusions of Law. The Planning and Development Department, having made the above
findings of fact, reaches the following conclusions of law:
1. That the development proposal is consistent with the Standards as per Tables 2-301.1 and 2-
304 of the Community Development Code;
2. That the development proposal is consistent with the Flexibility criteria as per Section 2-
304.G of the Community Development Code; and
3. That the development proposal is consistent with the General Standards for Level Two
Approvals as per Section 3-913 of the Community Development Code.
Based upon the above, the Planning and Development Department recommends APPROVAL of
the Flexible Development application to perrnit the expansion of a parking lot serving existing
attached dwellings in the Medium Density Residential (MDR) District with a front (east) setback
of 12 feet (to pavement), as a Residential Infill Project under the provisions of Community
Development Code Section 2-304.G, with the following conditions:
Conditions of A�proval:
1. That the Site Plan be revised to reflect a front(east) setback of 12 feet to structure;
2. That a building permit be obtained for the parking lot improvements and landscaping
improvements; and
3. That prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Completion all landscaping shall be installed.
Prepared by Planning and Development Department Staff:
m W. Nurnberger, Planner III
ATTACHMENTS:Location Map;Aerial Map;Zoning Map;Existing Surrounding Uses Map;Photographs of Site and Vicinity
Community Development Board—December 20,2011
FLD2011-10039—Page 6 of 6
Kevin W.Nurnberger
100 S Myrtle Avenue
Clearwater,FL 33756
727-562-4567
kevin.nurnberger,nmyclearwater.com
PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE
Planner III March 2011 to present
Planner II October 2010 to March 2011
City of Clearwater, Clearwater, Florida
Duties include performing the technical review and preparation of staff reports for various land
development applications, the organization of data and its display in order to track information and
provide status reports, and making presentations to various City Boards and Committees.
Planner
County of York, Yorktown, Virginia 2007 to 2009
Reviewed residential, commercial and mixed use development site plans to ensure compliance with
planning, zoning, subdivision, historic preservation, and environmental standards as well as design
criteria, specifications, regulations, codes and ordinances. Led pre-application meetings with residents,
neighborhood organizations, contractars, and developers regarding future projects which included state
and local government agencies.
Site Assistant
Gahan and Long Ltd, Belfast, Northern Ireland 2006 to 2007
Enforced Article 3 of the Planning Order (NI) with land owners, developers and district councils on
procedures relating to archaeological and built heritage remains on proposed development sites. On site
assistant to project manager during the archeological process throughout the pre-development stage.
Development Planner
Versar Inc, Fort Story/Fort Eustis, Virginia 2005 to 2006
Developed survey strategies for the Cultural Resource Manager by reviewing local and state planning
documents, the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Preservation Planning on Federal installations,
the Virginia Department of Historic Resources, the Virginia Department of Transportation plan, and
Virginia Power's public utility plan in the predevelopment stages of new development and building
expansion projects to ensure protection of historic properties.
CiTy Planner
Ciry Planning Commission, New Orleans, Louisiana 2000 to 2005
Primary subdivision planner assisting applicants throughout the subdivision process in accordance with
the zoning and subdivision regulations of the City of New Orleans. Reviewed various zoning and
conditional use applications. Prepared and presented staff reports to the CiTy Planning Commission and
Board of Zoning Adjustments.
EDUCATION
University of New Orleans,LA
MA Urban and Regional Planning(2004)
State University of New York at Buffalo,NY
BA Anthropology(1999)
� N o
Z � � �RANG�WODOAVE NAI�I�'N �• •�,:
� H�BART AVE p� �� �
CU
� n 1.�� AVE l�
' I
8
N N N � RICHAR�S
kEYSTONE DR rt� VU
' O O � v
N
i� C C O BsiKER � � �A
� � � � � � � ����� �
r
� � � CASLER p qVE O
� � r' DUNCAN AVE
O Q �
DUNCAN AVE y
O '-
� JUPITER AVE � �
0 .LPITER AVE � O
O =
SATURN AVE �
�� �v
cr��
� MARS AVE OU �
O p
KEENE RD CR.1
� KE E NE RD
� V�NUS AV�� VENUS AVE �
�a �
Feath a O
= $ A ORION AVE �❑ � �
Z
Q O y O � ATHER TREE DR
� AVE
N � �
Q ""' D �1�, a 1 /
(Q N CORONA A�� o y N � A / T
cp �. A � y 0 rn �1
N mm �
ARCTURAS AVE a y BRANDON �
N � �
D � � METEOR m AVE � �y
� � �
� � z �
. o
� o COMET nv� �yaN����
w �
o �O a o ,4t/M7��d
� p m
AURORA A� � � � � o
Q �' a
n Gf -Nor ro scafe-
�
� HERCULES AVE CR425
� �p� �� -No!a Survey_
ciRUS av� � ,,-�
�
N
^ ^ �
413
R/DGEWOOD ST 412 407 s z
h y
o a
� Q 401 � ° 2°, 2°,
� 406 � 0
328
MCK/NLEY ST
325 400
W 331
322 323 � 325
330
320 321 ai m ^ n
h � rn � ^ �
316 319 � � � ,^ ,^ 316 324 = 319 31
314 3{� 317 �
315 314
3f0 W 309 313 312 318 � 313
308 Q 307 309 3f0 312 30 �
I 308
302 � 303 307 306
300 C( 301 3 DR 304 306 � � ^ �
226 Z 227 301 302 300 301 �- °' °'
224 zzs ne 22a HARD/NG ST
223 222
222 223 221 � 22 221 � � �
� � � 21
220 221 219 21
214 217 216
215
212 213 212
211 210 �
209 208 �
� ¢ ¢ �a m
��b b ^ �
� b � O O p � O� ' 1D 0 N Q N �4 0 co Q RI
^ ' tb co � q� to 4f N m 4� tb lo � � � � � ���
^
� DREW ST
C DREW ST Z
�
W DREW ST
� ^ ^^ ��� Y ° � ; ; � "
Z � I
W no
� O W
114 � 115 Z �
11
Q W > >is
108 � f09 �
� Y � f09 f0
f04 L � Z 104
105
ZONI NG
Owner: 220 Tulane, LLC. Case: FLD201 1-1 0039
Site: 220 Tulane Road Property Size: 17,986 sq. ft. (0.41 acres)
PIN: 12-29-15-22482-002-0040 Atlas Page: 280A
_ --
8
r�. n �o� L7520 � 4�§ �
� � �
IDGEWOOD ST � 46 412 400 ' z „ �
pq Q � a
n qg �8 Q 499 � z �2°,
328 325 9 � �� � W '
aa aoo W 3� � MCK/NLEY ST
322 323 4.93 A c�c> � 325
320 321 8 � g 43 330 � 33 amo 0o n
r P '
318 317 �ti13°�°I°�° °a°�O°�° ' i0 31 42 324 = 334 3
7 � � �I�� _ �
314 ' 315 31314 I 12 � �� I s 312 a� 318 W 335 8 7 6 5
310 Q 309 — � _ �
308 y 307 6 309_ 15 � e`r�� qp 312 30� 1 p 3 a
g
302 � 303 —�
0 � 301 5 3�� _ 16 I � I �� 39 308 m 2� � r°p.
Z 0 � �02 N 300 �� .. .• i. ..
2 8 227 �� 38
�,z a zzs 4 2zs �a 5 22 � � HARD/NG ST
� 223 22
�22I2 22�3�J 221 — — '22 2 3y°2
�0 2'LY 3 Z� — 19 4 — Z' � � �
21
214 217 21
215 �3 g 7 6 5
� 212 _ 2 _ Q 213 — - - 212 � �
� _211 — — — 2 210 �
W _zos Zz_ _ , _2os W
avos q
, W i� T �—� — � - -� Q O 1.07 A� mmmm z I �� �
o W �o °o 1o�o le� $48118 � J N �uoa o0000000 '¢a� I�4 �
eo � Y n .°�.�.° �°p., °� ���.�.I.�. � aNO u0 M uNi '� famo a�o o^o I
r r r N rnt�e� cp QOCO C
�• o � I � � ~ e� � � � It���
30
� � - � DREW ST
DREW ST +' �
h�
� � DREW ST
n so r".r'°.r°°. �{:{: 60� o � I I w w `" "' `�' I
^ �-�.. •.•.•. " I I � � I� I� i� I � I
� I 2 I 3 I 4 I s � s I � � a
� � z z i a i s 2 120� I I I O � I �
—� - - - �e � � I I I� I ' I
114 � ��5 � 11 Q
; 3 � 3 ; 115 5 1 O
108 Q 109 Q �
� 4 4 Z = 109 6 2 � 0
Z
�oa g �os 5 5 W W �o
Z � � 105 � 3
Z H
EXIST►NG CONDITIONS
Owner: 220 Tulane, LLC. Case: FLD201 1-1 0039
Site: 220 Tulane Road Property Size: 17,986 sq. ft. (0.41 acres)
PIN: 12-29-15-22482-002-0040 Atlas Page: 280A
�,' µ f'l �K -
�� i•.�
� . a k4 °L
l:lL(s'C��i�L'�l. . ' . �✓ �� ' z
,� ,,� ., � �
� , ,�
P -.�` �'°
,
T iF
• 1
,
�
` � ; •.r�� �-� �� ��
� � . �' � , .— ;
��,. * ��,
� �r�* '�`Q
ti
� r -
.'u � •`
�. Y : ;;
, -r
� • • C • ���� �p
�� �� I k
� ± � ,h .n
�1� i}v �k
�� ^ri � .
i
`r. � �' e ��
� .`� � � . �� 0. 1
MF1 Q� . ,. �..� � 4 �{� ��`�
_ .
'I� � ' � +
i�zy�� 4 • � ? ' 1 ['., : „
` \ . � �'L'M' r
^(� , . �� o , f��.
s
b y � § � ,c, ,r .. I I I�� � .
9 ��*a.,�l�4 �',Y'
�� �' ��' �i• :.��.`"� �•;�` �'•
��� ,, . ��r � �� ,,.,�..,��E �
� �t `��. � �,�„ . . �. � �4„4� '
;r/ r �.i ,-r ��.� .jb, �1 �'..j��ih,�� ♦ ,y . � r;� .
E
.
V�` �°
� 4
j
� 1 �
� .y,� . '—..� . . 5�.� .
� �F� �J` i'� � _
�
n
_ .; �:' � Pl tl.�
{�, � ^f ,
, „ `�t���E �-�-�
.�,.J �� t - � � _ r • �
� � E� r .. , � � _ ��-. , , � , � �r '
. _
.
- � � ,-�� .. - !`a � .
>;
�� ,_ �_ . „�� ��,, L :L�l'�'�
- >.. i , . � _ �
.. �
� L-L'l'.i'.1 , -� y l _ --
� � `1 �
, ..�..,�+t"�`� f. ��j �"+x �`, . _�,.: _ �� = L!° -�� :�,- ��
_ � , �
,;.:S�1:: �: ;t,!, �y
�� 3 ��' �� � �, � a.�.
�rE. �I� .� (a ,
p 3. �� k� . !, � �'� . R, c:. .
F H
N I .... f `F° ,
� n � � `
; , �. . ......
i ���.�wN%��'
1 �.� ' F . . � ��1'
� �. � � � .. � ��
. , i
'', ^' ` � J �IY r:� .,li t J .'��. .
, .
. . � '- -� �� � ���� k'��
_r. � ` .:: ri t _ . ... > � � . r.
�'' + F�
. . , —..
'� � '_I � � � r._ �� ', ;a
� ,.., ,i : , � � ��� �e-j� -
. .�—,. �7( .. ... . �. � '^. . y` a
fR� �.^ .
1� �� t �.•; � 11 ..� , � .I/ � .•. ._ .ewY�r
� § i � C � �... i�`� -w J.` �� _ ._�i� �% I _ °.�,
y,�, ' x � R �:��� � �, � � ,
� `�' , � '� � `� `•* �
., � - � -_ �
� � � � �
AERIAL
Owner: 220Tulane, LLC. Case: FLD201 1-1 0039
Site: 220 Tulane Road Property Size: 17,986 sq. ft. (0.41 acres)
PIN: 12-29-15-22482-002-0040 Atlas Page: 280A
-,
�er..*N� p�}I � I \� " ����� � ;
.!y v� `�
:A=
. ..:. '�� � �III ,�. ,
F ��I�
.,.,�.�-�.:
� .... -. .. . �� �..ft,... :—.._e .�My-- ,.�
' Y'_..., � 5,}��� .
4X.�i .w..+a��wt .. . �1-•_ • €`:',........:.$�
�
- o
.:�
.
'
�. � . � .� ..,�Nar "'ri'�a` .
.,. . ...�� ,.,
� ..�
�`�a��.� �. k U�t �
)��3 .. �
�.
� 'A`
�*�;r .�w�.��� , .
� � �� �
...X.,���' . �. . �. . .�...�.. .. ,e s..'r,.,,y_�:nx �„
View looking NW from Tulane Road at parking lot area of the View looking SW from'I'ulane Road at parking lot area of the
subject ro e sub�ect ro e
:. ,�:m,-
_ r
�
� �`
���
�C ' �
� ��
I
�
�. s�
���,�� �������*�
�_ �
g, �"��# �"�,.. ..x
>" ` "r.
_
View looking SW from Tulane Road at subject property View looking NW from Tulane Road at subject property
parking lot.
�
� � �
��
, -, . _
� �i
�,�:
� R�: :. .. � ..
^ -N. ' irt.� ..r , . �n e
•� �<
, .- � �. .. '�...r.� . .�..ey..
.... .�.'.weNl .,:u�',�� >T�,+:`5..
�.. �� � ' . .(x ..
...
.. .. . . ��l,
t .._8 t �.,:. .. .-:. : _
y �
Q
ee
uN< < .,r..�s� �
. .< e , .,. —s ,. � . r• r , ps
3
�
..... .. .a.. .._ b.'k����... ....
View looking South along Tulane Road towards Drew Street. View looking W from Tulane Road at storage building south of
. the subject property
220 Tulane Road
FLD2011-10039
H
A
D
CIVIL ENGINEERING
11 November 2011
Kevin Nurnberger
City of Clearwater
Planning Department
100 South Myrtle Avenue
Clearwater, Florida 33756
Re: FLD2011-10039—220 Tulane Road
Response to DRC comments, 3 November 2011
Dear Mr. Nurnburger:
In response to the comments provided by the DRC for the above referenced project, Howard Civil Engineering
provides the following:
Engineering review:
1) Sheet C-2 was not review at this time. That level of detail is not necessary for DRC and will be reviewed
at Building Permit.
Understood, no response.
2) All utility pole relocations shall be coordinated with the owners of such facilities as noted on the drawings.
The pole relocations shall accommodate the proposed sidewalk and/or drive apron installation within the
right of ways of the adjacent streets. The City requires a 2-foot horizontal clearance from edge of
sidewalk to any vertical construction.
No utility pole relocations are required as a part of this application. The shown poles and
overhead utility lines have already been placed underground.
Environmental Review
1) DRC review is a prerequisite for building permit review; additional comments may be forthcoming upon
submittal of a building permit application.
Understood, no response.
Fire review
1) Plan shows a head wall to the north of the driveway, must not alter this as this the tee-turn to meet the
requirements of NFPA-1, 2006 edition Chapter 18 Fire Department Access, acknowledge prior to CDB.
The headwall to the north is not proposed to be altered in any way.
2) Must provide 30-foot radius on driveway. Acknowledge prior to CDB.
Driveway radii have been adjusted to have a 30-foot radius.
Howard Civil Engineering, LLC 4805 Independence Parkway-Suite 2508 Tampa,FL. 33634
Office 813.341.0496 Fax 813.341.0498 ii�..�i:��•r<�rciC'i.;i;�r�c;ir=�F;rir;G.zx;rr�
Land resource review
1) The proposed parking lot curb will impact the 50"oak tree than the previously approved plan.
Recommend resurfacing over replacement. If replacement is preferred obtain a certified arborist and
provide a Tree Preservation Plan stated in comment #2 below.
The plan has been revised to hold the existing edge of pavement to ensure that no further
encroachments in root zone area. Curb in this area is shown to be doweled/pinned curb.
2) Provide a tree preservation plan prepared by a certified arborist, consultant arborist, landscape architect
or other specialist in the field of arboriculture. This plan must show how the proposed parking,
stormwater, and irrigation impact the critical root zones (drip lines) of trees to preserved and how you
propose to address these impacts ie, crown elevating, root pruning, and/or root aeration systems. Other
data required on this plan must show the trees canopy line, actual tree barricade limits (2/3 of the drip
line and/or in the root prune lines if required), and the tree barricade detail. And any other pertinent
information relating to tree preservation. Provide prior to building permit.
Holding the existing pavement edge and utilizing the eutruded curb will not increase the
impacts to the root zone of the tree. After revising the plan per other comments,the
unpaved area of the root zone will increase. Of the 2/3 drip line area, approximately 48
square feet existing pavement is within the 2/3 zone. Post development the total amount of
pavement overlaying the drip line is 42 square feet,a net improvement.
Planning Review
1) The development proposal was approved for a front(east) setback of 15 feet in 2010, but was not built.
Please provide an explanation why the current request is asking to reduce the front setback to 10 feet.
The original permitted plan did not include curbing or the marginally wider spaces. Adding
in the curb and then maintaining or improving the existing impacts to the 50"oak tree
requires the further encroachment into the setback. Under the MDR zoning development
guidelines,for multi-family attached housing,this is acceptable.
2) The vehicle turn around in front of the single unit building is not necessary. It should be removed to
allow for some additional landscaping and expand the sidewalk.
The vehicle turn around has been removed.
3) A condition of approval for the dumpster enclosure (FLD2009-06019 & BCP2010-03135) was that the
Tulane Road overhead utility lines were to be placed underground. Submitted site plan shows utility lines
over a portion of the dumpster pad. Are utility lines not underground? Maybe an issue with the solid
waste department.
The overhead utility lines have already been placed underground. They have been removed
from the drawing.
4) Per CDC Section 4-202, provide a north arrow on all sheets.
North arrows have been placed on all plan sheets.
5) Per CDC Section 4-202, provide setback dimensions for the north, east, and south property lines to
pavement on site plan.
Dimensions to the property lines form the pavement have been added to the site plan.
Howard Civil Engineering,LLC 4805 Independence Parkway-Suite 2508 Tampa,FL. 33634
Office 813.341.0498 Fax 813.341.0498 ti���ur.i�c;w�rc��iv;s��n�ir�e�rin�.f;°�;rr�, Page2of4
6) Per CDC Sections 3-1403 and 3-1404, the parking area shall be resurfaced and restriped. Provide a note
stating that the asphalt parking area shall be resurfaced and restriped on the site plan.
The requested note has been added to the site plans, note # 6 sheet C-4.
7) Provide a note stating the parking Per CDC Section 3-1402, provide parking stall and aisle dimensions on
the site plan.
The requested note has been added to the site plan and dimensions are included on the site
plan as well.
8) Show wheel stops in each parking stall.
Wheel stops have been included on the site plan.
9) Provide a note stating that the parking lot/driveway curbs will be 6-inch concrete curbs.
On sheet C-4,Site Plan, the call out, note number 8 and the curb detail all indicate a required
6 inch height.
10) Remove all proposed curbing within Tulane Ave right-of-way shown on sheet C-4.
All curbing has been removed with the ROW. Curbs are shown to be terminated at the
property line.
11) Per CDC Section 4-202, show site triangles on the site plan.
Site triangles have been shown on the site plan.
12) Provide a note on the site plan stating that there are no proposed lighting changes to the existing site.
The requested note has been included on the site plan, #9 sheet C-4.
Solid Waste Review
1) I will need to see the enclosure brought up to code. The bollards in the back are too wide apart, one
needs to be placed in the middle of the two. Also, two on each side need to be placed.
Bollards have been indicated to be constructed within the enclosure. A bollard detail has
been included as well.
Stormwater review
The following shall be addressed prior to CDB:
1) Please tie the pond outfall into the ditch to avoid destabilizing the soil next to the existing concrete weir.
A swale from the outfall to the ditch as well as gravel dissipater pad underlain with
geotextile fabric to maintain the integrity of the existing features.
The following shall be addressed prior to building permit.
1) Provide a copy of the approved SWFWMD permit.
An exemption has been requested and a copy of the exemption letter will be provided upon
receipt.
Howard Civil Engineering,LLC 4805/ndependence Parkway-Suite 2508 Tampa,FL. 33634
Office 813.341.0496 Fax 813.341.0498 ���+rr°�.}���rrard�ivii�t��irse�r€rt ,F:��r�� Page3of4
General notes:
1) All resubmittals shall be accompanied by a response letter addressing how each department condition is
met.
This is the response letter.
2) DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may be forthcoming upon
submittal of Building Permit Application.
Understood, no comment.
Traffic Engineering Review
1) Provide accisble parking stall and details compliant with City standards on Sheet 22 (Index No. 118 and
119).
Standard city details have been provided on the dimension sheet, C-6.
Please do not hesitate to contact me with any questions or comments regarding this project at 813-341-0496 or
via email at iohn@howardcivilengineering.com.
Sincerely,
:'� ���
° � �
;�w
a!�� !� �r ..
John J. Mueller
Howard Civil Engineering
Howard Civil Engineering,LLC 4805 Independence Parkway-Suite 2508 Tampa,FL. 33634
Office 813.341.0496 Fax 813.341.0498 vn�v��:.i-icwar;��,iui=�'n�irre�r�n�,E;•'�rr Page 4 of4
� j
" Planning Department CASE#: ,
??. RECEIVED BY(staff initials):
�: 100 South Myrtls Avenue DATE RECEIVED:
-� :. '� Clearwater,Florida 33756
� - Telephone:727-562-4567
. . Fax:727'-562�86b
❑ SUBIWIT ORkGINAL SiGNEa AND OTARIZED APPLICATION
O SUBl�AIT 14 COPIES OF THE ORlGINAL APPLICATION-Plans and
application are required to he wlkated,stapled,and fdded IMo sets
O SUBMIT FIRE PRELIMARY SITE PLAN:;200.00
Q SUBMIT APPUCATION FEE$
* NOTE:1 S TOTAL 8ET8 OF INFORMATION REQUIRED (APPLICAT10N3 PLUS SI'fE PLAN SET3)
FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION
Residential Infill Project
(Revised 07/11/2008)
�PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT�
A. APPLICANT,PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION:(Code Section 4202.A)
APPLICANT NAME: 220 Tulane,LLC
MAILING ADDRESS: iQ7 Moore Street,Princeton,PU 08540 �
PHONE NUMBER: ��9�'9� FAX NUMBER:
CELL NUMBER: EMAlL: peter allington_marks�yahoa.com
PROPERTY OWNER(S�: 220 TUIetIE,LLC
Liat ALL wvners on the deed
Ac3ENT NAME: John Mueller,PE-Howard Civil Enginee�ing
MAILING ADDRESS: 4805 Indpendence Pkwy,Ste.250B
PHONE NUMBER: 813-341-0496 FAX NUMBER:813-341-0498
CELL NUMBER: � �� EM�v�: john�howarddvilengineering.corn
B. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION:(Code Section 4202.A)
PROJECT NAME: 220 Tulane Parking Lot Replacement PROJECT VALUATION: �
STREET ADDRESS 220 Tulane Rpad,Clearwater,FL 33756
PARCEL NUMBER(S): 12-2�15-22482-002-0040 �^ � ��
PARCEL SIZE(acres): 0.41 ax PARCEL SIZE(squere feet}: 17985 Sq ft
LEGAL DESCRIPTI�N: See attached deed
PROPOSED UsE(sy: Muki-family residential,no change in use
DESCRIPTION oF REC2uEST; Owner wtshes to remo�e the exlsting parking Iot and and base and rebuild the bt compl�ing
speci�ca�yr identity the requ�t with todays current standards to the greatest extent possible. A stormwater swale will be
(include number of units or square ���u e o prov e a enu on,re en on,fi a�menf� e a ona mpe ous.
footage of non-residential use and all
requested code deviaUoRS;e.g. '
reduction in required number of
parki spaces,speafic use,etc.)
C:�oa�ments and SettkipsWerekfergusonlPeslmoplplaming dept fams 07DB�Reside�lal InIIN Pro�ect(FLD)200607-11.00c
Page S of 8
. ,
DOES THIS APPLICATION INVOLVE THE TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS(TDR),I�REVIOUSLY APPROVED PLANNED UNIT
DEVELOPMENT,OR A PREVIOUSLY APPRQVED(CERTIFIED)SITE PLAN? YES_ NO n (if yes,attach a copy of the appkcable documents)
C. PROOF OF OWNERSHIP:(Code Section 4202.A.Sy
@ SUBMIT A COPY OF THE TITLE INSURANCE POLICY,DEED TO THE PROPERTY OR SIGN AFFIDAVIT A7TESTlNG OWNERSHIP
(see Pa9e�
D. WRITTEN SUBMITTAL RE�UIREMENTS:(Code Section 3-913.A)
10 Provide compSete resporises to the six{6}GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA—Explaln�each cri0e�ia is achieve3,in tletail:
1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony witfi the scale,bulk,coverage,densify and character of adjacent properties in which
it is�ocased.
This application dces not propose any change of use of the site. The proposed parking lot improvements are in
compliance with the local regulations. The site is multifamily which provides an aaeptac6le transistion trom the
2. The proposed develapmerrt will not hinder or disoourage the appropriate developmerrt and use af adJacent land and buildings or significanUyr
impair the value thereof.
The proposed improvemerrts are entirely within the boundary of the site and will not have any effect on the
a jacent properties.
3. The proposed development will not adversely atfecl the healfh or safetyr or persons residing or working in the neighbortaod of ihe proposed use.
the propsced improvements will not have any adverse effects on the health and safety of the residents. The
mprovemetns w attua mpro�e e ety o t e s te w t e construtt on o an par ng space at
n�nafc fnrl��'e rU17eRt�(�S
4. The proposed development Is deslgned to minimize traffic oongestion.
The proposed development will not have any effect on traffic,adversely nor positively,there is no change in use of;he
s e t at Mn I ncrease nor ecrease e amount o tra c to an rom e te.
5. The proposed devebpment is consistent with the communky character of the immediate viclnity oi the parcel proposed for development_
The parking area is desgined to same standards as the surrounding propertie. There is no change in use of the slte.
6. The design of ihe proposed development minimizes adverse effects,induding visual,acoustic and olfactory and hours oi operation impacts,
an adjacent properties.
There is no change in use of the site associated with this application which is resider�tial in nature. The surrounding
propert s are most commerc a w c are ig er ntensity use an e su �ect s e.
C:IDocumentsard SeltinqSWarek.(xguwnlDesMOp�plartning dept fortns 07081ResidenUal Irfill PraJect�FLDj ZUDH W-11.Eac
Page 2 of 8
WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Residential Infill Project Criteria}
� Provide complete responses ta the seven(�RE5IDENTIAL INFILL PRQJECT CRITERIA—Explain�each criteria is achieved,in detall:
1. TAe developmeM or redevebpment oi the parcel proposad(or devebprrreM is otherwise impractical withaut deviatlons irom the intensity and
developmeM standards.
There are no proposed deviabions as a part of this application.
2. The developmer�t of the parcel proposed for development as a residential InRll project will nol materially reduoe the fair market value of abutting
prope�es.(Indude the exisUng value of the site and the proposed value of lhe site with the imprav�ements.)
The�e is no change in use of the subject site from the current existing residential use and no additlonal impacts to the
surroun ng propert es.
3. The uses within the residential inflll projed are otherwise pertnitted In the Ciry of Clearwater.
Yes,the existing residentia4 use is a permitted use of the site in the City.
4. The uses or ma of use within the residential infill pro}ect are compatlble with adjacent land uses.
The existing use is oompatible with the adjacent properties and provides transition from the commerciat properties
that front on Drew Sueet.
5. The development ot the parcel proposed for developmenl as a residential iriflll project wlll upgrede the immediaie vianity of the paroel proposed
tor development.
The proposed impravemeMs wili greatly enhance the visual appeal of the site.
6. The des�gn of the proposed restdential irHlll project Creates a form and functlon that enhances the community Character of the immediate vicinily of
the parcel proposed for developmer�t and the Clty af Clearwater as a whole.
The proposed improvements creates a safe parking area in complfance with current codes and with the visual
Improvement contributes to the character of the community.
7. Flexibilily in regard to lot wldth,requtred setbadcs,helght and off-street parking are justified by the benefits to cammunity character and the
immediate vicinity ot the paroel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole.
The proposed improvements creates a safe parking area in wmpliance with current codes and with the vlsual
mpravement con ubes to t e c aracter o t e commumty.
c:�oocumerns end semnps�aerek.rergue«,�oewnop�paanninp dep�rams o7oe�Reswenua rmu arqect�Fl.o)2ooe o�-��.doc
Page 3 of 8
E. STORMINATER PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUlREMENTS: (City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteria
Manual and 4-202.A.21)
�SI A$70RMWATER NARRATIVE MUST BE SUBMITTED WITH ALL APPLICATIONS.AII applications that irnolve additlon
or madificadon of impervious surface, induding buildings, must include a stormwater plan lhat demonatrates compliance with the Cily of
Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteda manual.A reductfon in impervious surtace area does r�ot quallry as an exempUon to lhis requirerr�eM.
O If a plan is rtot required,the narrative shall provide an explanation as to why the site is exempt
�p At a minimum,thc STORMWATER PIAN shall inckude the folbwing;
Xl Existing topography exlending 50 feet beyond all property lines;
a4 Proposed grading inrJuding finished floor elevations of all structures;
�1 AA adjaoent sVeets and municipal storm systems;
OG Proposed stomnnraler detentionhetention area including top of bank,toe of slope and outlet coMrol structure;
� A naRative desCribing Ihe proposed storm�nrater co�trol plan induding aN calculations and data necessary to demonstrate comptianoe with
tl�e City manual.
❑ Proposed stortnwater deter�tioNreler�tlon area including top of bank,toe oF slope and outlel conlyd structure; Duplitdte CheCklist item.
� Signature and aeal of Flarida Registered Professional Engineer on all plans and cala�lations.
� COPY OF PERMIT IN�UIRY LETTER OR SOUTFNVEST FLORIDA WATER 14fANAGEMENT DISTRICT (SWFWMD) PERMiT
SUBMITTAL{SWFWMd appro�al is required prior to Issuance of Cily Building Permft},if applicable
� NOWLEDCaEMENY QF$TORMWATER PLAN REQUIREMENTS(Appllcant muat inRial one of the following):
Stormxrater plan as noled above is induded
Stormwater plan is not requlred and explanatlon narrative is attached. At a minimum, a grading plan and Tinished floor
elevatlons shall be provided.
CAUTION — IF APPUCA710N REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A STORMWATER PLAN
AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED,APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY
MAY OCCUR.
If you have questia�s regarding these nequiremenis,cflntacl the City Publlc Works AdmiNstration Engineering Deparlment at(72�562-4750.
F. SUPP�EMENTAL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 4202.A)
� SIGNED AND 5EALED SURVEY(including legal description of property)—One orlginal and 14 copies;
� TREE SURVEY (inGuding existing treea on site and witF�n 25'ot the adjacent sfte,by species,siz�(DBH 4"or greater},and locatlon,
induding drlp Ilnes and indicating trees to be removed)—p/ease design sround the existfng t�es;
!� TREE INVENTORY; prepared by a"oerUfied arborisY', of all trees 4' DBH or greater, reflecting siie, canopy(drip Ifnes) and
c�dition ot such trees;
� LOCATION MAP OF THE PROPERTY;
❑ PARKING DEMAND STUDY In conjundlon wiUt a request to make devia8ons to the paricing standards(fe. Reduce number of spaces).
Prior to the submlttal of this application,the methodology of such study shalE be approved by the Commu�ity Developmenl Coadinator and
shall be in accordance wlth accepted traffic engineerirg principles. The findings of the study will be used in determining whether or not
deviations to the parking standan�is are approved;
� GRADING PIAN,as appliqble;
� PRELIMINARY PLAT,as requlred(Note: Building permfts will not be issued until evidence of reoording a�nal plat is provided);
0 COPY OF RECORDED PLAT,as applicable;
C:loocurtrems and Seltingeld�rck.fergusonlDes�cmp�plannhy oept fams o708�Rediaennall�mN arojea(FLO)2009 a7•t�.aoc
Page 4 of 8
G. SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS:(Ssction 4202.A)
� SITE PLAN with the following ir�formation(not to exceed 24"x 36'�:
X Index sheet reter�ang individual sheets included in package;
x North arrow;
x Engineering bar scale(minimum scale one inch equals 50 teet},and date prepared;
X AN dimensions;
X Footpri�t and size of all EXISTING buildings arxJ structures;
N/A Footprint and size of all PROPOSED buildings and sirucWres;
x All required setbecks;
X All existing and proposed points of acaess:
x All required sight triangles;
x IdeMitication of �vironmentaNy unique areas, such as walercourses, wetlands, tree masses, and speamen Vees, induding
descripUon and location of understory,ground cover vegetatbn and wilydlife habftats,etc;Location of all public and private easements;
X Location M all street righ�-of-way within and adjacent to the she;
x Location of existing public and private udlfties,including fire hydrants,storm and sanilary seHrer linea,manhdes and lift staUons,gas
and water lines;
x All parking spaces,driv�aways,loading areas and vehicular use areas;
X pepidion by shading or crosshatching of all required parking lot interior landscaped areas;
X Location o1 all solid waste coMainers,recyding or trash handling areas and outs+de mechar�cal equlpmeM and all required screening
_ {per Sectiore 3201(D)(i}and Index�7U1};
x Location of all landscape material:
X Location of a11 onsite and oifsite storm-water m�agement faalities;
N/A Location of all outdoor ligMing fixtures;
X Localion of all existing and proposed sidewalks;and
Floor plan typicals of buildings for all Level One(flexi6le standard development)and Level Two apqrovals_ A floar plan of each floor is
N/A�quired for arry paridng garage requirir�g a Level One{mirimum standard and flexible standard)or Leve!Two approval.
� SITE DATA TABLE for existing,req�ted,and proposed deve{opmerrt,in writteMabular form:
EXISTING REQUIRED PROPOSED
X Land area in square feet arxl acres; 17386 sf/0.41 ac N/A N/A
T Number of EXISTING dwelling units; 4 ��— 4
x Number of PRQPOSED dwelling units; a N/A 0
X Gross floor area devoted to each use; 3981 sf � 3981 sf
� Parking spaces: totaf number, presented In labular fortn with the 8 8
x number of requlred spaces; �
x Tota�paved area,induding all paved parking spaces 8 driveways, 2436 sf/0.056 ac 3053 sf/OA70ac
_ expressed in square teet 8�percentage of the paved vehicular area;
x Official records book and page numbers of all e�sUng uliliry None
easemenr,
x Building and sinKture heights; 25� _ �_ � _
X lmpermeable suriace ratio(I.S.R.};and 0.40fi 0.459
N/a Floor area ratio(F.A.R.)for all nonresidential uses. _
� REDUCEp COLOR SITE PLAN to scale(8%:X 11);
0 FOR DEVELOPMENTS OVER ONE ACRE,provide the fdlowing additional infamation on site plan:
` One-foot contours or spot elevations on site;
� Otfsite elevations if required to e�aluate tl�e proposed stormwater management tor the parcel;
_ All apen space areas;
� Locatio�oi all earth or water retaining walls and earth berms;
_,,,_,,, Lot lines and building Ifnes{dimensionedy;
� Streets and drives{dimensioried);
_ Building and structural setbacks(dimensioned);
^ Structural overhangs;
C:1�ocumerqa�d Seltingebwak.teryuson�DeektoplpenNnp dept tortn��7081Rastdenial IMW ProJea(FLD)200847-�1.tloc
Page 5 of 8
H. LANDSCAPI�IG PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 41102.A)
�1 LANdSCAPE PLAN wiU�the following informadon(not to exceed 24"x 36'):
x All exisNng and proposed sVuclures;
X Names of abutting streefs;
x Drainage and retention areas inGuding swales,side slapes and bottom elerations;
X Delineadon and dirnensions ot all required perimeter landscape bufiers;
x SgM risibility triangles;
x Delineatfon and dimensions of all parking areas including Iandscaping Islands snd curbing;
x Existing trees on-site and immedfately adjacerst to the site,by species,size and locations,induding driplines(as indiCated on required
� tree survey);
Locadan, size, and 4uantities of ail existing and proposed landscape materials, indicated by a key relating to the plant
x schedule;
x Plartt schedule with a key(symbol or label)indicating the size,descxiption,specifications,quantftles,and spadng requiremerrts of ail
_ e�tisting and proposed landscape mate�ials,including botanical and common names;
x Typical pWnting details for trees,palms,shrubs and ground oover plarrts including insiructions,sdl mixes,backfilling, mulching and
_ protediwe measures;
x Interior landscaping areas hatChed andlor shaded and labeled and interior landscape cove►age,expressing in both square feet and
_ percentage covered;
N/A Conditions of a previous development approval(e.g.conditions imposed by the Community Development Board);
X Irrigation�oies.
� REDUCED COLOR LANDSCAPE PLAN to scale(8�X 11);
O COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM application, as applicable. Landscape assoGated witti the Comprehensive
Landscape Program shall exceed minimum Code requlrements to offset the areas rvhere minimum Code will not be met.
I. BUILDING ELEVATION PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4202.A.23)
a BUILDING ELEVATIDN DRAWINGS—with the fol4owing informatlon;
_ All sides of all buildings;
This section not applicable.
Dimensior�ed:
_ Colors(provide one full sized set of colored elevalions);
Materials;
a REDUCED BUILDING EIEVATIONS—same as above to scale on 8%=X 11.
J. SIGNAGE:(Di�ision 19.SIGNS!Section 3-7806)
❑N�A�111 EXISTING f�eestanding and attached signs; Provide photographs and dimensions (area, hegh[, etc.), indicate whether they will be
removed or to remain.
ON/AAII PROPOSED freestanding and altached slgns; Provide details including Iocation, size, height, colors, materials and drawing;
freesta�ir►g signs shall indude the street address(numerals)
��AComprehensive Sign Program application,as appliCable(separate app{ication and(ee required).
�f�Reduced signage proposal(8'r4 X 11) (color),'rf submltling Compreher�sive Sign Program applicatlon.
C:1�ocumente and SelHngelderek.fergusonlDeslRaplplenninp dept farms 070B�Rasi0e�a1 fnfiN Projoct{FLD}2D06 07-11.doc
Page 6 of S
K. TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY:(Section 4202.A.13 and 48a1.C)
0 Include'rf required by the Traffic Operations Manager or hislher designee or if the proposed developme�t:
• Vlfill degrade the aoceptable level of service for any roadway as adopted in the Comprehensive Plan.
■ Will generate 100 or more new vehicle directional trips per hour and/or 7000 w more new vehicle trips per Aay.
■ Will aftect a nearby roadway segment andlor interseclion with flve(5)reportable accidents within the prior twelve(12)month period or
that is on the Cilys annual list oi most hazardous intersections.
T�ip generation shall be based on lhe most recent edi6on of the InsGtute oi Transportalion Engincers(ITE)Trip General Manuaf.
The Traffic Impact Study muat be prepared in accordance wlth a 'Sc;oping Meeling°held with the T�affic OperaUons Manager and the
Planrdng DepartmenYs Developmerrt Revlew Manager or lheir designee(727-562�T50)
Refer to Section 4801 C of the Community Development Code tor exoeptions to this requirement.
�1 Aa;knowledgemeM of traific impact study requirements{Applicant must initia!one of the tollowing):
Traffic ImpaG Study is induded.The study must inGude a summary table of pre-and post-developmer�levels of service for all
roadway legs and each tuming moverrter►t at all intersecdons identified in the Sooping MeeHng.
Traffic Impact SluOy is not required.
AUTION - IF APPLICATION RENIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A TRAFFIC
IMPACT STUDY AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBM{TTED
AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR.
Ii you ha�e questlons regard'mg these requirements, oontact the City PubNC Works Administralion Eng�eering Department at(727y 5fi2-
4750.
L. FIRE FLOW CALCULATIONS!WATER 3TUDY:
Provide Fire Flow Calculations.Water Study by a FIRE PROTECTION ENGINEER to assure an adequate water supply is available and to determine if
amr upgrades are requlred by the developer due to the impaG of thls projecL The water supply must be able to support U�e needs of any required fire
spriNder,standpipe andlor flre purnp. If a fire pump is required the water supply must 6e able to supply 150%of its raled capacily. Compliance wilh
the 2004 Florida Fire PreveMion Code to include NFPA 13,MFPA 14,idFPA 20,NFPA 291,and MFPA 1142(Annex H)is required.
� Acknowledgement of lire flow calculations/water study requirements(Applicarit must initiai one of the fdlowing):
Fire Flow CalculationsNVater Study is included_ ,
Fire Flow Calculations1V11ater Study Is not required.
AUTION - lF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUiREMENT FOR A FIRE FLOW
ALCULATIONS/WATER STUDY AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED,APPUCATION MUST BE
RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIfICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR.
If you have questions regarding lhese requiremeMS,oontact the Cityr Fire Prevention Department at(72�582-4334.
M. SIGNATURE:
1,the underslgned,acknoNAedge that ail resentallons made STATE OF FLORIOA,COUIVTY OF PINELLA�S
in this ap lication are true an accurate the 6est of my Swom lo nd subscribed before me this,�_�ay of
knovul a e C' repre tives lo vislt and r ,A.�.20�!to me andfor by
phot r h e cxibe is applicatlon. � ,who�s pers ally know�qas
produ - 7D" 7" �) a
as iderrtification.
-- #INMi01�T
Si atu ro owner or re resentffiive ary puWic,
P p My Commissipt expi �'�•���/�.�1
OIM�MNM 1 H 1!!1!�
J , c:looarnants end setnnya�derek.fergusonweskcopp�andnq aept f«ms o7oevte.idenur�nnu vrqed(fLO)zaoa o7-11.aoc
Page 7 af 8
N. AFFIDAVIT TO AUTHORIZE AGENT:
1. Provide names oi all property owners on deed—PRINT full names:
220 Tulane,LLC
2. That(1 am/we are)the owner(s)and record title holder(s)of the foll�wring described property{address or general location):
220 Tulane Road,Clearwater,F!
3. Thet ihis property constitutes the property for which a request for a:{desaibe request)
Permit to construct parking lot improvements.
4. That ihe unders�ned(haslhave)appoiMed and(doesldo)appant:
lohn Mueller,PE-Howard Civit Engineering
as(hisRheuy agent(s)to execule any peMions or other documents necessary to affect such petition;
5. That this aH'idavit has been executed!a induoe the City of Clearvuater,Flarida to coraider and act on the above described property;
fi. That site visits lo the property are neoessary by Cily representatives in order to process this apptication and the owner authorizes Cily
representatives ta visit and photograph the property described in this applicaUon;
7. That(Ilwe�e undersigned authority,hereby certify that the foregoing is true and correG.
�? I�c��.r 0-'i+.��t
?roperty Owner Property Owner
Property Owner Properly Owner
STATE OF F�9R�BA, ►V•.,.,, ��,��
couNnr oF+u�u�s ��«.,
fore me the ndersigned,an offloer duly commissioned by the laws of the State of�le�ide-on Ihis � day of
7�.f... .^�a.�
�� personally appeared ��jL�aKK� who having been Tirst duly swom
De ses and says that helshe fully understands the contenls of the affida�it that helshe signed.
IVAN M BALEV
Commission �1 2273810
Notary Public, Siate of New Jersey
My Commission ExP ires
April 03. 2016 Notary PubUc Signatute (�
Notary SeaUStamp My Commission Expires: �� '� ��^pC ��,b
C:1Doc�mer�le and Setlirgalderek.tsrgusonlDeekloplpl�ning dept torms WOB1Residen6al I�A ProjeU(F�D)2008 07-17.00C
Page 8 of 8
� City of Clearwater
° }p� Development & Neighborhood Services
�. ��64�
�- Building Department
c� 100 South Myrtle Avenue, Clearwater, FL 33756
Phone (727) 562-45fi7 Fax (727) 562-4576
www.myclearv+►ater.com
Permit Application Checklist:
Only cornplete perrnit subrnittals will be aocepted.
Complete application must include the following as applicable to your project:
X Permit application form-cornpleted with legal description{Paroel Number).
N A Updated State, PCCLB, Occupational Licenses
N A NOTICE OF C4MMENCEMENT-RECORDED-one copy
X Plans review fee must be paid at time af submittal.
N a Interiorwork: 3 sets of signed and sealeci plans.
• Drawings to show entire scape of work-Floor ptans, electrical, mechanical,
plumbing,structural, elevatians,wall sections,details,etc.
X Exterior/site work: 8 sets of signect and sealed pfans for Commercial.
(3 sets for Residential -Interior&Exterior)
• Drawings to include items listed above plus drawings shawing scope of site
work. Engineered site plans shall include parking layout and lot survey.
• Tree survey(including 4"trees and their drip lines on site and within 25'of the
adjacent site.
• Landscape Plans for exteriar work.
N�A Development Order issued by the Director of Planning, if Flex or Flex Standard
was required.
X Clearing &Grubbing Permit. $1U.00 Fee.
N A Tree Removal application or`No Tree°verification forrrt.
Energy calculations as required by State Energy Code{3 sets).
N/A FEMA information for flood zone proper[ies.
a. New Construction:
1. Proposed elevation of new construction.
2. Sealed grade elevation survey(NGVD).
3. Plans shall be signed and sealed by architect or engineer.
4. Tie In Survey
b. Additians and remodels:
1. Need iwo cost estirnates for construction, or signed contract.
Building Official may ask for additional estimates.
2. Photos of existing structure.
3. Floor plans of existing structures.
4. Elevation Certificate showing lowest floor eievation (if not on file}.
N/A Owner-Builder forms for owner permit following contractor exemption noted in
florida Statute. Must show proof of residency/occupancy.
N/a Asbestos survey for all demolitions 8 renovations-Pinellas County 464-4422.
NOTE: Site and building drawings must be submitted together in a package
Permit Application Checklist-new.doc Re�ised 03/20/2006
Properry Appraiser General Information http://www.pcpao.org�general.php?pn=152912224820020040&sir-0&...
Infieractive Man of this oarcel Sales Ouerv Back to Query Results New Search Tax Collector Home P e Q�estion/Comment about this aa�e
r �
12-29-15-22482-002-0040 �
Portability Data Current as of September 24, 2011 Imp,rovement Ualue�
i Catculator [8:33 am Monday September 26] 1'rint Radius Search per F.S.553.844
-----...------------_-------___-__..____.----_._...--__ .___.--------------..__..._..._.__�_.._._........_.__._...._..-----------
s:•'�6'.
Owners�i ilin Address Site Address
� -
�
� TCJLANE LLC
(; 911 CHESTNUTG ST � 220 TULANE AVE CLEARWATER 33765- _. ...
CLEARWATER FL 33756 ' �'�.'
� .
� Pro,�erty Use.0820(Duplex-Triplex-Fourplex) Living Unrts:4
3 [click here to hide] 2011 Legal Description
j DREW HEIGHTS BLK B,N 31.25FT OF LOT 3&LOTS 4 AND S
;_______-___--------___-------------........_.._------------.....__.__.__...__..______._.......�-------.......�......_...._.___.._.....__---------_.____..---.._.__...._..._._..----____.------___._._._._...._.._........_i
t �� 2011 Exemntions Mortsage Letter � File for Homestead Eaemption
� Homestead:No Save-O�r-Homes Cap Percentage:0.00% Nan-Homestead 10%Cap: Yes �
; Government:No Institutional:No Agricultural:$b Historic:$0 I
;----------._._._._.__._._._..__.__.___...___. __
_ _._........__..._._..-----.._.__...----.._...--------..._._._.__.._._.__.__.____-----____._.._..__.....� _
� 2011 Parcel Infarmatian 2Q11'1}�im Notice
� �----------------�-�------------ ------�_._..._._.�;._._......_------�--------------------.__�----------------;----�-�--�---�---;------------------�-�-----...__.._......_.._._._._.,
Mast Recent Conve ay nce ;_ �Sales Comuarisnn � Censas TYacta Evacuahou Zone Plat Book/Page ;
� 16b75/0480 ; $244,1{IO Sales e 12103026602 NON E�/AC � Ol l/]O1 ;�
� 2011 Preliminarv Value Informatian s
� Year �ve-Our-Homes Just/Market Assessed Value/ County,.Taxable School Taxable Municipal Taxable s
� c�a Value S�H Cap �a.lue Value Value ;
� 2011 No $171,780 5171,780 5171,780 $171,780 $171,780;
€ [click here to lude]Value�Iistory as Certified(yellow indicates correction on file)A' ;
4 },eaz Save-Our-Homes Just/Market Assessed Value/ CauntX Taxable School Taxable Municipal Taxable i
C�a Value SOH Cap Value Value Value ;
i 2U10 No $175,216 $175,216 $175,216 $175,216 $]75,216?
( 2009 No $215,753 $215,754 $215,754 $215,754 �215,754)
; 2Q08 No $266,300 $266,300 �266,300 $266,300 $26�.300
� 2007 No $272,304 $272,300 $272,30(} N/A $272,300
� 2006 No �267,00(1 $267,000 $267,000 N/A $267,004
� 2005 No $201,900 $201,900 $201,900 N/A $201,9QOI
� 2004 No $]9b,800 $196,800 $196,800 N/A $196,800�
� 2003 No $184,900 $184,900 $184,900 N/A $184,900�
� 2402 No $173,500 $173,500 $]73,500 N/A $173,500;
; 2001 No $144,900 $144,900 $144,9(}0 N/A $144,400;
� 2000 No $126,700 $126,700 $126,700 N/A $12b,700;
i 1999 No $]25,200 $125,20Q $125,200 N/A $125,200�
; 1998 No $123,300 $123,3Ub $123,300 N/A $123,300j
� 1997 No $122,400 $122,400 $122,400 N/A $122,400'
1996 No $122,400 $122,400 �122,400 N/A $122,40�I
_. . .. .. .. . .. .......
- --.___....._...__......_.._..__,_...,.,.........._...�.----...--�-----.___._....._._......... ......._._.... . ...__._._._._. .. _._._._._._...__.____.__._...__._..._.._._.._......_......---------......._..---------..-------------�
t ZO10'I�ag Iaformation i Ranked Sales See aU transactions �
{ Click Here for 2010 Tax BiEI Tax District:CW ! Sale I}ate BooklPage Price �/U V/I i
�2010 Final Millage Rate 20.9523 i 18 Aug 2009 16675/U480 ■ $25d,000 Q 1 ;
; i 1
1 of 3 9/26/2011 8:37 AM
Property Appraiser General Information http://www.pcpao.org/general.php?pt�=152912224820020040&sr�&...
2010 Est Taxes w/o Cap or 24 Jun 1998 10144/O160 � $155,0(l0 U I
Exemptions $3,671.18 1980 45086/0310 +9 $11,OU0 Q
A significant change in taxable value may occur when
sold due to changes in the market or the removai of
exemptions.Click here fo�more information,
2011 Land Ipformation �
Seawall:No Frontage:None View: '_,
�
;
Land Use Land Size Unit Value Units Total Adiustments Adiusted Value Method �
Multi-Fam<10 Units(08) 131x139 225.OU 131.0000 0.9520 $28,060 FF 3
____.�
[click here to hide] 2011 Building 1 Structu�al Elements Back to Ton �
�
Site Address: 220 TULANE AVE CLEARWATER 33765- �
€
Quality:Average s. i
� s
Square Footage:4420.OU �
, 19 `
Foundation:Continuous Footing �
Floor System:Slab On Grade .. I
Exterior Wall:Cb Stucco/Cb Reclad ;
. �
Roof Frame:Gable Qr Hip � !
ao T an B� :a t
Roof Cover:Composition Shingle � )
�
Stories: l s, BAS 3j �
Living units:4 " 3 {
ss--�
Floor Finish:CarpeU YnyUAsphalt �
Interior Finish:Drywall/Plaster . �
Fixtures: 12 �
36 �
Year Built: 1983 j
Effective Age:21 �
Heating:Central Duct i
�
Cooling:Cooling(Central) i
�
� Building 1 Sub Area Information
� Description Livin Area Fiz Gross Area Ftz Factor Effective Ft2;
I
Base 3,660 3,660 1.00 3,660�
Oqen Porch d 550 0.20 110E
Utility 0 2]0 0.35 74 i
Total Living SF:3,660 Total Gross SF:4,420 Total Effective SF:3,844i
. .. _ ..._._.-------'._�._.._-----J......_.__...-.-'-_'.--'...__. .�__._.-.._._._._._....�- ----1
f �� [click here to hide]2011 Extra Features �
; Description Value/Unit Units Total NewValue Depreciated Value Year ;
( PATIO/DECK $6.00 195.00 $1,170.00 $468.U0 1983 �
� ..._..._______.__�.—�. ____.� _ _._.� �
� [click here to hide] Permit Data
Pemit i�omiotlon fa ncaiv�d from1M Cou�Hy and Ciq�s.This dafs rny bs Y�ca�QNb and rt�y�xelud�pemils U+at do not nsuk in iNld rovNws(ior�xsrtplo
/or wabr M�r nplae��nt pamils}.My qwstlons nganling p�rMFS should be dincfod to the pamitlinp ofNe�In whieh the structu�Is located.
�� Permit Number--.—---�Descri�tion-- ---�-- Issue Date ; Estimated Valae �
BCP2011-02087 HEAT/AiR ! 07 Feb 2011 ; $3,22�
2 of 3 9/26/20l 1 8:37 AM
Property Appraiser General Information htlp://www.pcpao.org/general.php?pn=152912224520020040&s�(?&...
I 2006U2588 � ROOF E 09 Mar 2006 $12,3 ,I
dius i ;
feet): j erials: 2Qi1 Color ; ' rans arenc 0 5 �
� �..--- ; p y -=----_._,
1000 y � _
�.
..�..�,,..._�....._�._-------._..._._.__.._...._..._.___..._.._.._____._..._._.__..._....._..._�_....--------...�._.._.__.�_-----_._________----------_._...__...........----_._---------__.— -------_._._...---�
if you do not see map,the SVG viewer has not been tnstalled. Click here for informatlon and installatbn. i
ow to eopy and pastc a static map usiag Interoet Expbner.Right clickon the map;Select"Copy SVG';Open a Word documenr Select `
"Paste Special"from Edit menu on toolbar;Select Bihnap,then OK ;
ow to copy and pxste a static map using Mozilla Firofox:Right-click on the map;Select"This Frame";Select"Open Frame in New ;
�
indow';Prim from the new window. ±
{ " i
t �
i
i
.
I
i
( s
�
� �
;
i i
( �
�
I
i
Click here� Click here;
for I for 3
, lnteractive� nteractive�
i Man � Map ;
� t
� t
I
f (
� Y �''.'�..' !
` � �
S ��'_':��
j "�:':''•: ,
� ��.-.....:.:3r.':' i
�
�
i
E
� 3�
E �
� �
� `
,
f i `
--------- ----...__._...._.�._..,.._------._.---------------------_..___.
Interactive Man of this parcel Sales uerv�a�k to Ouerv Result�New Search'Cux Collector Home PaS4 Ouestioi�lComment about this naee
3 of 3 9/2b12011 8:37 AM
IN: 2009219079 BK: 16675. PG: 480, 08/19/2009 at 09:56 AM, RECORDINa 1 PaG83
$10.00 D DOC STAMP OOLLECTION $1750.00 I�.N H(JR1C6, CI.$RK OF COUR'f PINELLAS
COUNTY, FL BY DEPUTY CLERK: CI.F�R03
�
CK,
,•,
rr+�w�a ov a�n�rurw Ta ' '
�
DA1M BROWDER JR.�ESQ. + i
305 s.Duwr�w avE. _ ' �
C�vtwA�R FL 33755 '- _�� ��
(NO 1TilE NSURED OR 5EARCfi PEAFOFwEO) -,�` �.�)
�`� � � ..
PROP6air APrr+us�x'S PutCEL 1�12@9113fY148?lOQ2A(!90 ,��� ' '
. . . �
• �`�,�.
Wsrranty Dwd � � �,
-- '.
,
,' ��
THIS INDEHfTURE, EFFECTIVE n�us_�DAY oF AuGUST, 2009, 8EIWEEN JULIE STREET, A SING4E � ,��' `,����, `��'
PERSON�WFIOSE POST OFfICE AODRESS IS:6SO ARBOR LANE, Uwco,FL 33774,HEREM REFERRED TO AS ��`� � ;
"('�IiA1di0R��AND ZZO YULANE�LLC,A FtORIOA LIMREp LIABN.ITY COMPANY,IAMOSE P06T OFFICE ADORESS�.�_;� `� ��__ i���
tS:911 CHESTNUT STREET,CIEARWATER,FL 33756,HERElN REfERREO TU AS°GFtANTEE". � ' ..
I / .
i i :'�
WITNESSETH TFiA?7HE SAID GRANTOR,FOR MD IN CONSIDERATION OF THE SUM OF TEN DOLLARS($1O.QO���` � ;
AI�O OT}�R Ca00D AND VALUABLE CONSIDERATiON TO SAID GWWTOR IN HA1JD PA1D BY TFE SAID GRANTEE,THE"� ��_�� ,'
RECEIPT YVH£FiECF IS HEREBY AqCNONfLEOC�ED,HAS GWWTED,BARGAIPED 141�SOLD TO THE SAID GRANTEE,AND � --
6RHNFEE�S HEIRS AND ASSIGNEES FOREVER,THE FOLLOWING{lE*'uCR18ED LAND, SITUATE, LY�NG AND BEkA1G iN
PplELtAS COUNTY,FLORIDA,TO-YYfT: ,��'�
.`>
�r� NoRTr+ 31.25 �T oF Loz 3 n►a au oF Lots 4 a� 5, BLOC�f�:-[]RENi'HEICNIS,
ACCORDING TO TNE MAP OR PUIT TIIEREOF AS tiECO�ED IN PiAT BOOK 11,RA6£�1f}�aF 3F�E'PAlBUC
� � . ,,, .
RECOH�S OF PINELLAS COUNTY,FLORIDA. ` �.' ' �'
� �
.`� ,
� �
ANU SAID GRANTOR DOES HEREBY FULLY WARRANT TFE TI1lE TO SAID_UWD, ltf�7'Y'ALL,DF�FEW THE ShME
AGAINST LAINFUL CWMS OF ALL PERSONS YdFlOMSOEVER. AS USED 11f�pWS INSTRUME��t1��1N0(iD6"GRANTOR"
ANG'GRANTEE"ARE USEO fOR BOTH SINGULAR RND PWRAL AS THE�ONTE%T REIX11FtFS.
� � � �
, � r
fN WITNESS WHEREOF,GRANTOR HAS HEREUNTO SET,GRANTOR�S�HATID6ND'5FAL TFIE DAY AND YEAR FIRST
. . ,
ABQVE 1NRITTEN. � ' `-
.�, `��.
SkGNED,SFA ANDOE RED W S�iC�:�``„'��� �`�
� , . .� . i'�. !�.
* `�'� � ; ��.��ie�l/O '������
i w ss: �, � , IE STREET,�wwroR
:Z� ,
,
f�ESS: ATRICUIR�#E£DER�,�� �.�,
� � `��� `.i
i � i ,
STATE OF FLORiDA'`. �`,�•, ;�`
! COUNNOF PINELLAS�`.�� __ � �
� ` ``. :' tk�
TyE�fORE691t�;INS�RUMENT wns o e�FORe � n+is _ /d� ou►r oF
AUGUST,`� �1',`�ULIE SrREET WHO IS PERSONAU.Y TO h1E OR WHO HAVE PRO�►10ED
� � ` �� S IDENTIFI ID NOT)TAKE AN OATH.
.�
NaTnF�r n�.i�,Sti��oF F�owaa MY CO►�ussroN ExPr�s:
Nl1ME: --
A�l SCf{8�NO,; 11YODI�i�p110GNlIr/
E1i�iMDL2oH
wwir�mwunr�.w
2011 LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY ANNUAL REPORT FILED
DOCUMENT#L09000�61671 Secretary of St te
EMity Name: 220 TULANE, LLC
Current Principal Place of Buslness: New Pr�neipal Place aT Business:
911 CMESTNtlT STREET
CLEARWATER, FL 33756 US
Curre�Mailing Address: New IYlailing Address:
911 CHESTNUT S7REET
CLEARWATER, FL 337b6 US
FEI Number.27-0792112 FEI Nurnber Appisd For( ) FEI Mxnbsr Not Applicabls( } CsrtiBcata oT Status Dssirsd( �
Name and Address of Current Registered Apent: Name and Address of New Registered Agent:
POTTER,ROBER7
911 CHESTNUT STREET
CLEARWATER, FL 33756 US
The above named entity submits this statement for the purpose of changing its registered office or registered agent,or both,
in the State of Florida.
SIGNATURE:
Electronic Signature of Registered qgent ��
MANAGING MEMBERSlMANAGERS:
Title: MOR
Name: HM FLORIDA HOLDINOS,LLC
Address: 811 CHESTNIIr STREET
City-St-�ip: CLEARWATER,FL 33756 US
I hereby certify that the information indicated on this report is true and accurate and that my electronic signature shall have
the same legal effect as if made under oath;that I am a managing member or manager of the limited liability company or the
receiver or trustee empowered to execute this report as required by Chapter fi08,Florida Statues.
SIGNATURE: R08ERT V POTTER RA Q4/24/2011
Electronic Signature of Signing Managing Member, Manager,or Authorized Representative/Date
2011 LIMITED LIABiLITY CQMPANY ANNUAL REPORT FELED
DOCUMENT#LD90Q0061311 3ecretary of St,ate
Entity NamQ: HM FLORIDA HOLDINGS, LLC
Current P�incipal Place of Business: New P�fncipal Place ot Business:
911 CHESTNUT STREET
CLEARWATER, FL 33756
Current Mailing Address; New Mailiny Address:
911 CHESTNUT STREET
CLEARWATER, FL 33756
FEI Numdsr.2T-07922�7 FEI Number AppNsd For( ) FEI N�nbsr Not Applicabls( } Certilkate oT Status Dsa'ved( )
Name and Address of Current Reglstered Agerrt: Name and Address of New Registered Agent:
POTTER,ROBERT
911 CHESTNUT STREET
CLEARWATER, FL 33756 US
The above named entity submits this statement for the purpose of changing its registered office or registered agent,or both,
in the State of Florida.
SIGNA7URE:
Electronic Signature of Registered,�qent Date
MANAGING MEMSERSIMANA�iERS:
Title: M(iR
Name: MARKS,PETER A MR
Address: 107 MOORE STREET
City-St-Zip: PRINCETON,NJ 08540 US
I hereby certify thatthe information indicated on this report is true and accurate and that my electronic signature shall have
the same legal effect as if made under oath;that I am a managing member or manager of the limited liability company or tfie
receiver or trustee empowered to execute this report as required by Chapter 608,Florida Statues.
SIGNATURE: ROBERT V POTTER RA 0412112011
Electronic Signature of Signing Managing Member, Manager,or Authorized Representative/Dake
SITE PLAN - 220 TULANE ROAD �
PARCEL ID:12-29-15-22482-002-0040 J �'�
� �LL A
a�k,�� W w��
°'n�� Z ;��
� (7V��
c
' y -°-' � � ,�a�amn-a� W m o'��
. e,.,n a
nmi
«�
W J � �'
i.:�" . . .. W E � ;�a�
I� ' , .. p,-� ..._ ___� "' � £ . � nmi�0.� (� > $�
a � �- s � ��
��_ ...._ ...� _..�.::_..._..._..._.�` = _ S �U� o
' . . .._ ... ...
... ... �Yr
u�c.�mcerv�. s�isn'
t,
t �._______ _________...._ 54i6_5�_1'�nt`,K_.......,�_...._ �-� a
In`" I _ 3��a
�
� " O
I ' � �,�,m ° �, 1° . ^ NOTES: _
Ia / 4 —
i ' p/eWmwROOr2qS.�oE*/L -9 9 U 1. PPOPOSEDCONS'fNUGRqN9TAXT0ATE:0ECOABEfl
y�I . I SIGHTTRL4NGLEPER CLEARWATER � '�
,'�'-`:: elYf� CAMM.CODE SECTION&904 z. n�ie s���ccesae�rNnawc sr,uc�s u+� r�"�.
i I o E � g�� � � � � m ' TMERE CAN BE NO OBSTRUCTIONS 11ECOMMENOED TO BE P�VEO MrtIH CONCNETE �.
BEIWEEN 2.5 AND EIGHT FEET WITTIIN THE PAVEMENT�SEE DETNIS SHEEf e�.ARPlNLT IMV BE
r�cn
I I : �1 1 � I . VISIBILfLYTRVINCLE3(NOTREESOR ��M�OMIEVEII.THECOHIAACTOII���DVISED�� \��``.,�
' 28.9� � �RS " FREESTAND�NGSIGNI. ADACOMPLUNCE��WI���MENlS. �>v�
I i E r '__--_- "" ;�T . � 9. ILLLDISTVRBED�REA60NSRENlDWIiHIN110Y/SIWL �
I � � :���� Wr2��m . Q {. IHESUDBEGT9RE18LOCATEDINFLOODZONEX g P
�5� ��W � amfeocr ewO�muKxrt� I Q NiEASWi510E0F500YEMFlAODELEVAl10NS.FEMA ��
f .{ �: ., ��TPA�r € yq MqPPANEL1210.9C010]H. �
i � � 1'STORYMASONRRY �oE,,,,� € � 5. NlYD�M�DSIOEM/Al1CCUA�01iPAVEMEMM�MIN ��tl ����
n�e now sNnu ee rv�raoveo u+o n�o.
€ 'Ya> BUILDING Y E,e,� 8. TIEPAHpNpMFA$&INLBEPAVEDWIMASPINLT �
_... s� � PARTMENTUNR f � Fom�.mmn ANDSIPoPED116SHOW�IPFACIEMWRTFAWC31W9 � 4 ����
� .I � �� , �N W I nnoaia�. �$ ��.
€ � (1 UNI'� ir z ]. PNtlON0UY0UTPEPCtENIM/ATElICACSECIqN ��� �3a �
( __.�,�. . � 40 �f 3tao2.
� �{ � / �x' �:.� O��frLL 14TYP. J B. �CURXlPROP09ESNOALBlFAM10N8TOTHES1IE ° E a
i'' _____ _ �enenwcud °�a° 'i I � u01rtNOWFNSfPo1CfUNE ��� �
. �
i
1 � ;; b' � ' : �S �
,, � .......__� �. .
� ,_ � �� �. R9v, . � ' __ �s o.rou<F w�
o I 29.9' � to.t9'� �I � �... � ��
�� ,� ::�: lE➢W� _ Wrcin9 Surfan�
� ' MfN81MqHfCUl. ; n�R
1t
i __"� e BH ETK I I �w .. o
90.8' .oe , : ..._..._..._..._...__._.__..._..._ o �� .
i 220 TULANE ,� �-• — a
��� °� aa.. o g
� Perol ID:12-2&1&22182-002-0D90 �I ..I b v e ' Q¢U
3 ° 1 STORY MASONARY BUILDING o I >s�:�°�'��'. �b9'�°"��. . z ¢O ui
� � APARTMENT UNIT(3 UNRS) ° I `ik� a z W
___i IXCAVATION NOTE i, � yZ�%%i� /li� � �F�
_._
I:'"_'_�.� WMPACf011TOPWTAKRIEMFA80F e�� : � N �Q F
� IXGVATpN1HATOCLUIUNDHiT{IE 37�P I
��`, GfJOPESOFE10611NGlilE6. -_______. � � �� _____�+ •, . STRAIGHT CURB I f Q O
x• I
G •
'90.6 I ea+uoe a �a N
,�°,- ° (��N
� Y% £ N ll
�� � ________ i p
_ ,
�
j � :` ���:::�
_� � � � � �."' �
�� ; � �� _'� �O � a�� �I � �e..n�aaa
. �� .� -.va, ___:.._.. �a:�_ � �i \
�; �.... 'i� _- s ices�u,K ' 'lr� -�, 1. ,- --� �,... ? p a.
�`., �..,._... �...�..._..._;�,. _..._.—..._..._ ir '`}.�..,� _ _... ...—...�.. � _..__ � aac
, . ..r,.. . ,,. . � %
• � �� �
•aae �� r� ��na.�.iv�a
�� 1
\� �
� '�•���.
� ._ un.ari-urmc9ns j�...•.•.•.. • ' '
�- . - _ �� RN/OOMIF.LL�q1RB
. � mnsmna pIG1n)
_ . _"'_._ om.em,r � , ia�ve
s�romtwnrrn��ari�m �� �� �' I I i � __aammmxa[rex.¢lim�a� 6����E� �
Sidewalk With Curb �i '°°"'"'�"°T-'° � •`'°`�`
K..a an,��
;� �a��ro�.� ���,o-�
�.���E:,w«�..,�,,,.�..,».a«� ��.,s„��,
` °�""`°"`"""""°`�""'°°�"°"°'� STANDARD PARIQNG LOT PAVEMENT �TANDARD CONCREfE PAVEMENT
�,.,md«�.�,,,�.Y„o,�.�.��..�,�.���,,�
. �,�"`a"���������
N.TS
C-4
.
LAN DSCAP E P LAN - 220 TU LAN E ROAD � �
PARCELID:12-29-15-22482-002-0040 m��
�i, t � �� c� �� � � �o (7 m LL�
I N Z � �
,.< � — c,
--- � W W ��
�:::_..._..._..._..._..._..._...—..._:::_..._..._..._..._..._..._..._.__..._...K.�. —
I �� �
�,
1 W E W.
_..._..._..._._ .,,. � 67.88 2.�� ..
� - � �. _,_ _ _ — � s —
C7V�LL
-----n�3� 6,`�d' yZj m v',�
, ����
, � , � �;�, � �� V m��
S G0
,�� �� +� � ��'��� s 3��g
� o � � a
g � MG �
� ' �' � � — °` SIGHT TRIANGLE PER CLEARWATER °x
�° �." +�� 'I _ � COMM.CODE SECTION 3-904 � � ;�
� �. �o,' '��' � m THERE CAN BE NO OBSTRUCTIONS ���
`O �� 6� �� ; �`O �� �'� �� BETWEEN 2.5 AND EIGHT FEET WITHIN THE �a
°� �; ' I I �g J �, ' �� VISIBILITY TRIANGLES(NO TREES OR
� '��, + � FREESTANDING SIGN). g� �
�"
� + �
9 6'9 J +��� 'SO rL`LY �� ��� ����
Q �.
�_J–=' � °�. � ��� � �
� � �W� ���
-� � Q ��� ��`�
o `��` gpg
� . o�=T � a
7 P�N��NG NOTES €p� �
,��b � �NU�s��rw�..��.w.�m�n+ea�o� �@
�� ,.�r..e�cmon wonr .cmn..
aravw�x�amwennowo�ro.i an�ne�.uaer wm�rmenrna
oe�mwwr oF rnwa�n��annosa.vo ar,vnwoe wn w�rc ri.v�a rrnr i
�� + 1� D<� ,� � YWp1D�10m�ttae�.ua�wom��e sr wimx�
' q�� �- "-j � x wwneHUSrcncu�xmawim�wi,flm�ra��mu�romeY�an
� ,v�.wvnmmrcnw�nrmv.m��au�naa��aMw
�'�. -�`O ...+`O h`b `x �f ��m:y...,YP,Rmvr�.,m,xov�aswn�r.mo,m Q
4 � TF + ��� /� � v�,x�a'�''ieaa�nreuua�nxan�a'�war��'i�romE�..ar� �2 U
<3. O{ � � \� � �u���&Wi�w�io�A81F�eBMIroENB11� � O Q J
a l� �b� �O �� (o , 'rFx'"E-r"w�m�"�'0w.`Oi�r.a or+s°PrffrMOPEiao'�oam°XN1oracgr:oF�aocwc w W�ui
a � �O �J� ,\� � `�^u,w�muamuaxomwnone+s�vrovuu�,m.cwau+e nd Z W�
� d�� V �� � � °'�muvrxa�irt�s�nunmeurNTMtuaxrEwuwownmr� h �Q
�ei� 1 ' 0.mm�aw�roarvei�oarcm��s�nm�Er�a.� � ���
���. I �� � � ����ennra�e��aaem�nmwrwnwxcw c°�q�
�J. � �� �� �� .I � „v�"�nu"im"PE�nuw�oeriswu�s ururimErnor�� J
me
� p1.: �. w��r�nwx�rx+,rn�arearcamiauo��onan U
. a �� ' C�v'" ��' . �f 'Pwwiff�ua,�mw�rx°�'isrmi���a"��°s�wa��ov�.
�. n�weeeo�an o�a ew�u mnno�m�ano�v�x aF.n.�a�
` ,: ia�wn�uo
_.. �-- �C �3 . � ...�� I� �ernumra xrese�um.
u.wuunonmMm.e�oxroemrvoenuaerersw urourroan.scciw mrnro
�0�� �O � � � i w �q� o `� "`
08_ I ��`b ��� 6'j � �
O.8� ROPOSED ADA + �° �
..._..._..._..._..._...—..._..._..._.__..._..._..._..._.._..._.__.__..._.__
DETPJL ' � �O �°� �
LAN E � ��� - -- �
�:� � �g.
r, � M _—+
PROP09ED RANT IFGEND
/�\ 9hWe tntm
�J�I 2 WieGemM�9i^w� w9^Mr6atlMa�eMG) 2.5'f+iWa.loRb9M.5b'SP�.30y. �
�L J �
Shrvbs
1•=5
O 29 Wsw vb.mmim Wam�m olavwum ry0) i&-21'FagM.29'mn.apue.3C Mc.9 gl.
eOoFannr�l Name AbbcwGai
w
'�r
�C-7