The URL can be used to link to this page

FLD2011-09031; 1421 MISSOURI AVE S #A; BAY TO GULF � 1421 S MISSOURI AVE A Date Received: 9/1/2011 1 : 13:06 PM Bay to Gulf ZONING DISTRICT: Commercial LAND USE: Commercial General ATLAS PAGE: 314B PLANNER OF RECORD: PLANNER: Kevin Nurnberger, Planner III CDB Meeting Date: December 20, 2011 Case Number: FLD2011-09031 Agenda Item: E. 3. Owner/Applicant: Salvatore Belloise Representative: Housh Ghovee/Renee Rug�iero,Northside En in�eerin�Services, Inc Address: 1421 S. Missouri Avenue CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT GENERAL INFORMATION: REQUEST: Flexible Development application to permit 2,245 square feet of retail sales and services and 800 square feet of office use in the Commercial (C) District within an existing building with a lot area of 10,463 square feet, a lot width of 104 feet, front(west) setbacks of 12 feet (to existing building) and zero feet (to existing pavement), side (north) setback of 10.2 feet (to existing building) and zero feet (to existing pavement), side (south) setbacks of 37 feet (to existing building) and zero feet (to existing pavement), rear (east) setbacks of 18.5 feet (to existing building) and zero feet (to existing pavement), a building height of 11 feet (to top of flat roo fl and 14 feet (to top of parapet), and 12 off-street parking spaces as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project under the provisions of Community Development Code (CDC) Section 2-704.C., as well as reductions to the front (west) landscape buffer from 15 feet to zero feet, the side (south) landscape buffer from five feet to zero feet, the side (north) landscape buffer from five feet to zero feet, the rear (east) landscape buffer from five feet to zero feet, a reduction to the foundation landscape requirements from five feet to zero feet and a reduction to the interior landscape requirement from 10 percent to zero percent under the provisions of CDC Section 3-1202.G. ZONING DISTRICT: Commercial (C) District FUTURE LAND USE PLAN CATEGORY: Commercial General (CG) PROPERTY USE: Current: Vacant, Retail Sales and Services Proposed: Office, Retail Sales and Services EXISTING North: Commercial (C) District Vacant SURROUNDING South: Commercial (C) District Retail Sales and Services ZONING AND USES: East: Open Space/Recreation Open Space (OS/R) District West: Commercial (C) District Retail sales and vacant Community Development Board—December 20,2011 FLD2011-09031 —Page 1 of 10 _ ANALYSIS: Site Location and Existing Conditions: The 024 acres is located on the east side of S. Missouri Avenue approximately 380 feet south of the intersection of S. Missouri Avenue and Lakeview Avenue. The subject property is currently developed with a 3,245 square-foot commercial building with multiple tenant spaces. The building has been vacant for ten months. Surrounding properties adjacent to this site are zoned Commercial (C) District, with the exception being a retention pond to the east being zoned Open Space/Recreation (OS/R) and Preservation (P) Districts. Properties to the north and south of the subject property all have similar building and structure setbacks, and are either vacant or being currently used as a retail sales and service use. Properties to the west across S. Missouri Avenue are developed with retail sales and services uses. Development Proposal: The proposal is to establish retail sales and services use and an office use in a building that has been vacant for ten months. The building presently has two tenant spaces. The western tenant space of 2,245 square feet is to operate as a retail sale and service use. The other tenant space consists of 800 square feet that is to be utilized as an office space. No specific tenant is proposed to occupy either space. The applicants are aware that a condition of approval shall be that the 800 square feet of gross floor area proposed for Office use shall only for Office use. This site is nonconforming to current setback requirements. CDC Section 6-102.E requires nonconforming structures that have been abandoned for more than six months to be brought into full compliance with current Code requirements. Due to this site being fully developed, this proposal recognizes many of the existing setbacks to the existing building and pavement that do not meet current Code requirements. Site improvements are being made where possible and appropriate while providing as many parking spaces as possible. This proposal reorients the location of some of these parking spaces so that they function and comply with the parking standards of the Code. This proposal requires a minimum of 12 parking spaces as determined by shared parking table in CDC Section 3-1405 for an office and retail use in a building with 3,245 square feet of gross floor area. Pavement and trees are being removed in order to meet Code provisions and to improve sight triangle requirements at the entrance to the site. An existing greenspace area within the South Missouri Avenue right-of-way is being removed to provide an ADA compliant sidewalk and handrail offering access to the subject building. The removal of pavement at the rear of the property allows for added greenspace which will provide needed visual improvements to this site. These improvements, while not meeting the full Code provisions, will greatly improve the appearance of this site in an area of S. Missouri Avenue that needs improvement and re- investment. Without the reductions requested, the redevelopment of this site would be otherwise impractical. In order to form an attractive appearance, the proposal includes a few architectural design elements. The addition of a decorative black cloth awning will be added along the west and south elevations which includes extending the awning to wrap around the northwest corner of the Community Development Board—December 20,2011 FLD2011-09031 —Page 2 of 10 building. A decorative aluminum handrail is proposed along the south sidewalk that will add an architectural detail to the design of the structures. The applicants propose to provide a distinctive color pallet of rich brown, black and white. Such improvements to the appearance of the building will be in striking contrast to the previous condition of the building. Floor Area Ratio (FARZ Pursuant to the Countywide Plan Rules and CDC Section 2-701.1, the maximum FAR for properties•with a designation of Commercial General (CG) is 0.55. There presently exists a total floor area of 3,245 square feet for a FAR of 0.31, which is consistent with the Code provisions. Impervious Surface Ratio (ISR): Pursuant to the Countywide Plan Rules and CDC Section 2- 701.1, the maximum allowable ISR is 0.90. The existing ISR is 0.92 and, after construction of the proposed improvements, the ISR will be 0.91, which while still nonconforming, will at least reduce the existing nonconformity. Minimum Lot Area and Width: Pursuant to CDC Table 2-704, there is no minimum required lot area or lot width for a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project. However, for a point of comparison, pursuant to CDC Table 2-704, the minimum lot area for office and retail sales uses can range between 3,500 — 10,000 square feet. The existing site is 10,463 square feet of lot area, which exceeds these Code provisions. Pursuant to this same Table, the minimum lot width for office and retail sales uses can range between 35 — 100 feet. The site has 104 feet of frontage along S. Missouri Avenue, which exceeds these Code provisions. Minimum Setbacks: Pursuant to CDC Table 2-704,there are no minimum required setbacks for a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project. However, for a point of comparison, pursuant to CDC Table 2-704, the minimum front setback for office and retail sales services uses can range between 15 — 25 feet, the minimum side setback can range between 0— 10 feet and the minimum rear setback can range between 10 — 20 feet. The proposal includes a front (west) setback of 12 feet (to existing building) and zero feet (to existing pavement), side (north) setbacks of 10.2 feet (to existing building) and zero feet (to existing pavement), side (south) setbacks of 37 feet (to existing building) and zero feet (to existing pavement) and rear (east) setbacks of 18.5 feet (to existing building) and zero feet(to existing pavement). Due to this site being fully developed, this proposal recognizes many of the existing setbacks to the existing building and pavement. With the number of parking spaces meeting the minimum number required, site improvements are being made where possible and appropriate. No further removal of pavement will allow far the installation of enhanced perimeter landscaping without eliminating required parking spaces and drive aisles. Surrounding properties have setbacks to buildings and pavement similar to this site. Maximum Buildin� Height: Pursuant to CDC Table 2-704, there is no maximum allowable height for a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project. However, for a point of comparison, the maximum building height for office and retail sales and services can range between 25 and 50 feet. As proposed, the height of the flat roof will be at 11 feet with an additional 18 inches for a parapet wall, both of which are well below that which may be permitted based upon the above Code provisions. Community Development Board—December 20,2011 FLD2011-09031 —Page 3 of 10 Minimum Off-Street Parkin�: The applicant indicates there are 14 existing parking spaces that are not well marked and don't meet current Code requirements. This proposal reorients the location of some of these parking spaces so that they function and comply with the parking standards of the Code. Pursuant to CDC Table 2-704, the minimum required parking for office uses can range between 3 — 4 spaces per 1,000 square feet, retail sales uses can range between 4 — 5 spaces per 1,000 square feet. CDC Section 3-1405 requires two or more uses to calculate parking based on a Shared Parking basis. When taking both uses into account for this site and the Shared Parking calculation, the required parking is 12 parking spaces. The proposed site plan provides 12 parking spaces. Pursuant to CDC Section 3-1405, when any land, building or area is used for two or more uses that are listed in the shared parking table, the minimum number of required parking spaces shall be determined by multiplying the individual minimum parking requirements by the appropriate percentages listed in the table. The following table depicts the development proposals parking requirement as per the shared parking table: WEEKDAY WEEKEND Use: Midnight 9 A.M 6 P.M 9 A.M. 6 P.M. 6A.M 4 P.M. Midnight 4 P.M Midnight Retail(11.225) 5%=0.56 70%=7.85 90%= 10.1 100%=11.225 70%=7.85 Office(3.2) 5%=0.16 100%=3.2 10%=032 10%=032 5%=0.16 Totals: 0.72 11.05 10.42 11.545 12 8.01 Based upon the above, the development proposal requires a minimum of 12 parking spaces. As proposed, a total of 12 parking spaces will be provided; thus the development proposal meets its parking requirement. Sight Visibilitv Trian�lLes: Pursuant to CDC Section 3-904.A, to minimize hazards at the existing driveways on S. Missouri Avenue, no structures or landscaping may be installed which will obstruct views at a level between 30 inches above grade and eight feet above grade within 20- foot sight visibility triangles. The proposal has been reviewed by the City's Traffic Engineering Department and been found to be acceptable. Landscaping: The applicant has reoriented four parking spaces at the rear of the property. This has allowed for the removal of 276.5 feet of pavement which will be replaced with greenspace. Proposed plantings within this area will include two southern magnolias and white Indian hawthorne groundcover. The northern perimeter of the property will be planted with two crape myrtles, twenty-one schefflera shrubs and bahia grass groundcover. In addition to these plantings, seven schefflera shrubs will be added along the rear building foundation. The applicant is also proposing to landscape the State Road right-of-way along South Missouri Avenue with 840 square feet of groundcover. With very little area available to include landscaping, due to the need for every parking space proposed and drive aisles, there is no remaining area on site that can be further landscaped. The proposal includes a reduction to the perimeter buffer (west) along S. Missouri Avenue from 15 to zero feet, a reduction to the north perimeter buffer from five to zero feet (to existing pavement), a reduction to the south perimeter buffer from five to zero feet (to existing Community Development Board—December 20,2011 FLD2011-09031 —Page 4 of 10 pavement), a reduction to the east perimeter buffer from five to zero feet (to existing pavement), a reduction to the foundation planting area from five to zero feet and a reduction to the percentage of interior landscape area from 10% to 0%, as a Comprehensive Landscape Program under the provisions of CDC Section 3-1202.G. Much like required setbacks, this proposal recognizes many of the existing perimeter buffers. Staff finds the landscape proposal satisfactory due to the built conditions of the site. Comprehensive Landscape Program: Pursuant to CDC Section 3-1202.G, the landscaping requirements contained within the Code can be waived or modified if the application contains a Comprehensive Landscape Program satisfying certain criteria. The following table depicts the consistency of the development proposal with those criteria: Consistent Inconsistent 1. Architectural theme: a. The landscaping in a comprehensive landscape program shall be designed as a N/A N/A part of the architectural theme of the principle buildings proposed or developed on the parcel proposed for development;or b. The design, character, location and/or materials of the landscape treatment X proposed in the comprehensive landscape program shall be demonstrably more attractive than landscaping otherwise permitted on the parcel proposed for development under the minimum landscape standards. 2. Lighting: Any lighting proposed as a part of a comprehensive landscape program is X automatically controlled so that the lighting is tumed off when the business is closed. 3. Communiry character: The landscape treatment proposed in the comprehensive X landscape program will enhance the community character of the City of Clearwater. 4. Property values: The landscape treatment proposed in the comprehensive landscape X program wil] have a beneficial impact on the value of property in the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. 5. Special area or scenic corridor plan: The landscape treatment proposed in the X comprehensive landscape program is consistent with any special area or scenic corridor plan which the City of Clearwater has prepared and adopted for the area in which the arcel ro osed for develo ment is located. Solid Waste: The property will be served by black barrels for the office and retail uses. The proposal includes the construction of a concrete pad and sidewalk at the rear of the property. Black barrels will be stored on the pad. The sidewalk will allow the tenants to wheel the black barrels around the building to be brought to the front for collection. The proposal has been found to be acceptable by the City's Solid Waste and Fire Departments. Si ng a�,e: There exists a nonconforming (height and setback) freestanding sign. CDC Section 6- 104.A applies to this proposal in which any redevelopment of a principal structure, or a principal structure is vacant for a period of 180 days, signs on the parcel proposed for development shall be brought into compliance. No signage is proposed at this time, however, a condition of approval is that the nonconforming sign shall be removed and replaced with a sign that compliant with current Code requirements either through a building permit or the Comprehensive Sign Program. The removal of the existing sign must be done in conjunction with the other improvements being made to the property. Community Development Board—December 20,2011 FLD2011-09031 —Page 5 of 10 Code Enforcement Analysis: There are no active Code Compliance cases for the subject property. COMPLIANCE WITH STANDARDS AND CRITERIA: The following table depicts the consistency of the development proposal with the standards as per CDC Section 2-701.1 and Table 2-704: Standard Proposed Consistent Inconsistent FAR 0.55 0.33 X ISR 0.90 0.91 X' Minimum Lot Area N/A 10,463 sq.ft. X Minimum Lot Width N/A 104 feet X Maximum Height N/A 11 feet(to flat roo� X 1118 feet(to parapet wall) Minimum Setbacks Front: N/A West: 1.2 feet(to existing building) X 0 feet(to existing pavement) Side: N/A North: 10.2 feet(to existing building) X 0 feet(to existing pavement) South: 37 feet(to existing building) X 0 feet(to existing pavement) Rear: N/A East: 18.5 feet(to existing building) X 0 feet(to existing pavement) Minimum Office:4 per 1,000 SF 12 total parking spaces(12 spaces X Off-Street Parking Retail: 5 per 1,000 SF required per Shared Parking calculation) 1—See discussion in Staff Report Community Development Board—December 20,2011 FLD2011-09031 —Page 6 of 10 COMPLIANCE WITH FLEXIBILITY CRITERIA: The following table depicts the consistency of the development proposal with the Flexibility criteria as per CDC Section 2-704.0 (Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project): Consistent Inconsistent 1. The development or redevelopment is otherwise impractical without deviations from X the use and/or development standards set forth in this zoning district. 2. The development or redevelopment will be consistent with the goals and policies of X the Comprehensive Plan, as well as with the general purpose, intent and basic planning objectives of this Code, and with the intent and purpose of this zoning district. 3. The development ar redevelopment will not impede the normal and orderly X development and improvement of surrounding properties. 4. Adjoining properties will not suffer substantial detriment as a result of the proposed X development. 5. The proposed use shall otherwise be permitted by the underlying future land use X category, be compatible with adjacent land uses, will not substantially alter the essential use characteristics of the neighborhood; and shall demonstrate compliance with one or more of the following objectives: a. The proposed use is permitted in this zoning district as a minimum standard, flexible standard or flexible development use; b. The proposed use would be a significant economic contributor to the City's economic base by diversifying the local economy or by creating jobs; c. The development proposal accommodates the expansion or redevelopment of an existing economic contributor; d. The proposed use provides for the provision of affordable housing; e. The proposed use provides for development or redevelopment in an area that is characterized by other similar development and where a land use plan amendment and rezoning would result in a spot land use or zoning designation;or a. The proposed use provides for the development of a new and/or preservation of a working waterfront use. 6. Flexibility with regard to use, lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street X parking are justified based on demonstrated compliance with all of the following design objectives: a. The proposed development will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of the surrounding properties for uses permitted in this zoning district; b. The proposed development complies with applicable design guidelines adopted by the City; c. The design, scale and intensity of the proposed development supports the established or emerging character of an area; d. In order to form a cohesive, visually interesting and attractive appearance, the proposed development incorporates a substantial number of the following design elements: ❑ Changes in horizontal building planes; O Use of architectural details such as columns, cornices, stringcourses, pilasters,porticos,balconies,railings,awnings,etc.; ❑ Variety in materials,colors and textures; ❑ Distinctive fenestration pattems; 0 Building stepbacks;and O Distinctive roofs forms. e. The proposed development provides for appropriate buffers, enhanced landsca e desi n and a ro riate distances between buildin s. Community Development Board—December 20,2011 FLD2011-09031 —Page 7 of 10 COMPLIANCE WITH GENERAL STANDARDS FOR LEVEL TWO APPROVALS: The following table depicts the consistency of the development proposal with the General Standards for Level Two Approvals as per CDC Section 3-914.A: Consistent Inconsistent 1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, X coverage,density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage development and use of X adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons X residing or working in the neighborhood. 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. X 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the X immediate vicinity. 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including X visual,acoustic and olfacto and hours of o eration im acts on ad'acent ro erties. SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION: The Development Review Committee (DRC) reviewed the application and supporting materials at its meeting of October 6, 201 l, and deemed the development proposal to be legally sufficient to move forward to the Community Development Board (CDB), based upon the following: Findin�s of Fact. The Planning and Development Department, having reviewed all evidence submitted by the applicant and requirements of the Community Development Code, finds that there is substantial competent evidence to support the following findings of fact: 1. The 0.24 acres is located on the east side of S. Missouri Avenue approximately 380 feet south of the intersection of S. Missouri Avenue and Lakeview Avenue; 2. The subject property is currently developed with a 3,245 square foot commercial building with two tenant spaces that have been vacant for more than six months; 3. The proposal is to permit an office and retail sales and service use in the building; 4. This site is nonconforming to current setback requirements; 5. This proposal includes the provision of 12 parking spaces as determined by the Shared Parking calculation set forth in CDC Section 3-1405; 6. The maximum allowable FAR for the Commercial General (CG) is 0.55. The proposed FAR is 0.13; 7. The maximum allowable ISR for the Commercial General (CG) is 0.90. The proposed ISR is 0.91 which while nonconforming will result in a reduction of the existing nonconformity on the subject property; 8. The existing site is 10,463 square feet of lot area, which exceeds Code provisions; 9. The site has 104 feet of frontage along S. Missouri Avenue, which exceeds Code provisions; 10. The proposal includes reductions to setback and landscaping requirements; 1 L The creation of new landscaped areas, as well as the landscaping of existing perimeter buffers, while not meeting the full Code provisions, will greatly improve the appearance of this site in an area of S. Missouri Avenue that needs improvement and re-investment; 12. There are no active Code Compliance cases for the subject property. Community Development Board—December 20,2011 FLD2011-09031 —Page 8 of 10 Conclusions of Law. The Planning and Development Department, having made the above findings of fact, reaches the following conclusions of law: 1. That the development proposal is consistent with the Standards as per Section 2-701.1 and Table 2-704 of the Community Development Code; 2. That the development proposal is consistent with the Flexibility criteria as per Section 2- 704.0 of the Community Development Code; and 3. That the development proposal is consistent with the General Standards for Level Two Approvals as per Section 3-914.A of the Community Development Code. 4. The proposal is consistent with the criteria of the Comprehensive Landscape Program as per Section 3-1202.G of the Community Development Code. Based upon the above, the Planning and Development Department recommends APPROVAL of the Flexible Development application to (1) permit 2,245 square feet of retail sales and services and 800 square feet of office use in the Commercial (C) District within an existing building with a lot area of 10,463 square feet (0.24 acres), a lot width of 104 feet, a front (west) setback of 1.2 feet (to existing building) and zero feet (to existing pavement), a side (north) setback of 102 feet (to existing building) and zero feet (to existing pavement), side (south) setbacks of 37 feet (to existing building) and zero feet (to existing pavement), rear (east) setbacks of 18.5 feet (to existing building) and zero feet (to existing pavement), a building height of 11 feet (to top of flat roo fl and 14 feet (to top of parapet), and 12 parking spaces as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project under the provisions of Community Development Code Section 2- 704.C., as well as reductions to the front (west) landscape buffer from 15 feet to zero feet, the side (south) landscape buffer from five feet to zero feet, the side (north) landscape buffer from five feet to zero feet, the rear (east) landscape buffer from five feet to zero feet, a reduction to the foundation landscape requirements from five feet to zero feet and a reduction to the interior landscape requirement from 10 percent to zero percent as a Comprehensive Landscape Program under the provisions of Community Development Code Section 3-1202.G., with the following conditions: Conditions of Approval: l. That a building permit be obtained for the parking lot improvements, landscaping and building improvements; 2. That prior to the issuance of any Business Tax Receipt, that the parking lot improvements, landscaping, and building improvements are completed; 3. That the tenant space which consists of 800 square feet of gross floor shall be only for Office use; 4. That the existing 6 foot wooden fence which restricts access to the rear parking area be removed prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Completion; 5. That the final design, color, and elevations of the proposed architectural modifications to the building be consistent with the design, color, and elevations approved by the CDB; 6. That mechanical equipment on the exterior of the building shall be screened on all four sides; and 7. That the existing nonconforming freestanding sign shall be removed in conjunction with the other improvements and that any future signage must meet the requirements of Code. Community Development Board—December 20,2011 FLD2011-09031 —Page 9 of 10 _� i Prepared by Planning and Development Department Staff. v' W.Nurnberger, Planner III ATTACHMENTS: ❑ Location Map D Aerial Map O Zoning Map 0 Existing Surrounding Uses Map ❑ Photographs of Site and Vicinity CommuniTy Development Board—December 20,2011 FLD2011-09031 —Page 10 of 10 Kevin W.Nurnberger 100 S Myrtle Avenue Clearwater,FL 33756 727-562-4567 kevin.nurnber�er a myclearwater.com PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE Planner III March 2011 to present Planner II October 2010 to March 2011 City of Clearwater, Clearwater, Florida Duties include performing the technical review and preparation of staff reports for various land development applications, the organization of data and its display in order to track information and provide status reports, and making presentations to various City Boards and Committees. Planner County of York, Yorktown, Virginia 2007 to 2009 Reviewed residential, commercial and mixed use development site plans to ensure compliance with planning, zoning, subdivision, historic preservation, and environmental standards as well as design criteria, specifications, regulations, codes and ordinances. Led pre-application meetings with residents, neighborhood organizations, contractors, and developers regarding future projects which included state and local government agencies. Site Assistant Gahan and Long Ltd, Belfast, Northern Ireland 2006 to 2007 Enforced Article 3 of the Planning Order (NI) with land owners, developers and district councils on procedures relating to archaeological and built heritage remains on proposed development sites. On site assistant to project manager during the archeological process throughout the pre-development stage. Development Planner Versar Inc, Fort Story/Fort Eustis, Virginia 2005 to 2006 Developed survey strategies for the Cultural Resource Manager by reviewing local and state planning documents, the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Preservation Planning on Federal installations, the Virginia Department of Historic Resources, the Virginia Department of Transportation plan, and Virginia Power's public utility plan in the predevelopment stages of new development and building expansion projects to ensure protection of historic properties. City Planner City Planning Commission, New Orleans, Louisiana 2000 to 2005 Primary subdivision planner assisting applicants throughout the subdivision process in accordance with the zoning and subdivision regulations of the City of New Orleans. Reviewed various zoning and conditional use applications. Prepared and presented staff reports to the City Planning Commission and Board of Zoning Adjustments. EDUCATION University of New Orleans,LA MA Urban and Regional Planning(2004) State University of New York at Buffalo,NY BA Anthropology(1999) QV� � a (�� '� � TUS�W� — v� °"i'u'� ° z C�°0 D ��,� Z � 0�� o � � �` -� I' � FA LTON ° TUSKA'WIILLA ST rues�wa $ j �•` m �Z� I z O� BROWMNG �4 4._..s,� �m ��z r T� CF�488 � � d ¢ 4 d t� • •.'� ! J _' "- :1", > 1 d �[ � � Iy O �Of �� ; SOUTH Sf j � � 4 Em�j I— Z Z z � ��- J � _ ' Z � Z Z fl z � � . Q V � ° d � U �� PROJECT Q � � �' � � � � SITE v ,: IOt1G�LEY ST mpGelt � � ' � Z .� �,l K Z . .. � OUEEN Si y � - =• QUEEN m m � -:TEM11 � ALMA ` --'• �rveY O � o r_ _BELLEVUE BLVD �a�c,� Hsrris � f, -. Z � wn�uireonln I. _�• '• � � � w `;�LE ��,' '� • , . .,t � m �4 _ m Ltl W IRNODO UI �� •'•• • ��`{ � � � � Y ' � o > 7 m C] w ��"..t$• � d d 4., •. �_ �:;,. . . ',_' --1 ) > �_— • � ' � W �� "-�} —°-�v,�oou�ri'rvrr: :� ti L'h t_ '.! � r-r.N t. . . ��.'--°.�. j g d G Q 4 Ver'mn w �-: �. •,i ��er� �P,cJ 1'.. 4 ,i � 'C� ��..` ! � �. � -- � e Ha�ra�.a� sr }---" _ ..�.�.. s, � �4� . � Z o Z z i ,�'I • +Y- � ~ V�� Q Y � a Z � � -.t.'.�d1 �.� '`'I o � w � � vai O = d V � s te.�u.-�'_, p�•�� w � HDVJARD 37 z � r O � q� � g � 's ' � w � w � � � '� ' °'� °- m w � ..�s•*�I+�i�� wyr�� w�..'..r..,�.. Rp r�l;,t`^F.�_�� .��.�...�..�r•n��r�..r�.�i�iG6'�"�"7 ""� '_� : -�:';::T-- iGr':.rwr..�4 . •....•. • .._ ....... ... ...�.:...�.:...�. . .. ._....�: ..-::. ..•.... . : 5 �. .�.. . . ...'. •• ''y.i'::• ............. . ..... .a r'-:•. :� lil ' '-'� _ . - 3 : ::, � .� .. Q : _:;. .�. :. .:} _; �. _ _ LOCAT►ON Owner: Salvatore Belloise Case: FLD2011-09031 Site: 1421 S Missouri Ave Property Size: 0.24 Acres PIN: 22-29-15-78552-001-0040 Atlas Page: 314B 1377 1376 � �< 1379 1378 W 1380 � 1381 1377 W 1355 , � � 1383 1382 z 1383 1390 Q 1357 y � 1 a 1385 1384 � 1387 1354 � ? ? 139 1390 U 1393 = 1361 1360 W � � � p� � �@ � C � � KIN EY ST 1362 1363 1364 1 �o '� � 1401 1400 1149 1157 ' � � 1400 1402 1409 O`/K IJ l� 1404 1166 1176 '� '� ^ 1414 1417 w h ' 142 > ; p T^ ^ R Q Q ,42, L > > � � � y y 1435 u� v�i � 1430 � � � � 1437 ALMA ST y y � � � � 144 1445 N � N N �T\ 4 N N N N N � / . N N N N 1447 L BELLEVUE BLVD 1448 � �451 � .. _f4� . .'_'.', ''f452,. 1453 . '° -�td� ".'1635i.. . �.•y�� L "(�.;.' :14 ,�llj.�• "..•�� '•'�'�.• ta5� . .. •�•-•i�r' � -, -..• . W 1460 Q:.. .. C 1456`=� � �.�461,:',' ' -,.{46 �.. ,.`. •' ' �•• .�. .. ,'.•.� . .: �_:�4,�fi1• •r': '..1,45D. •��,��146,`f� 'r.� �o ' � .�.� •�•' � � , 1467 .4f '.'•.. :;,' � ' '��-'��5•••• . .'_f4fii{.••O:,°94¢5�: � � 147 1475 1470 • .... �. ,e ..� ;.•,•;:. 1471 '.��.,`�. . . • . . . 1479 > �f47��.. , • .''�- .f489'.f449. 1474 . •1d¢Q• 1158 148 .94 7;- •• :1a1'Y • •• 1483 1478 � . ZONING Owner: Salvatore Belloise Case: . FLD2011-09031 Site: 1421 S Missouri Ave Property Size: 0.24 Acres PIN: 22-29-15-78552-001-0040 Atias Page: 314B 737� �� 137 8 17 � ' � — — — ?6_ +�co 1380 138 I 1377» I I W 33 Z�_ 1 ,j v 138� 16 1382 1383 _ �_16 1390 Q 1357 32 — - - y y t z 2 29 ` � 1385� 151384 �� I t5 1387�Z _ 1�354 Z - - - - ? z 13 �I� r � I 1393 � I � 1381 30 _ _30 13Bp � � q�9 12y 13 �'1�90 11 � 12 � 13 I14 +� ��— 4 I25 I26 '27 0 - - � �-� � I so I I - - - - - - - � KINGSLEY STI � + 10 I I 136 50 1383 ze 32 138 eu 1 � m m m 140� —� - — — — —1400— • — ' ^ ' �— — �114 1157 � 1400 � 52 97 � � 192 � 193 I I 2s8 4 5 6 I 7 O •- •-O � '°° 1409 — � I— — f�— — � — � _ O 1402 8 se � � _isi � �sa _I � 2e�_ r — � � 1ao4 — 7 — ss � � �so �� ss— � L 2es �iY � a � e ^ 4 — 1 �— ,ea � <zo, � � � ; ,a, ,� �� ,00 , , _ �, �,—ss , zss q — — —� — — ioi � � iaa is� � I 2� 4.9 A o „o � — — i r — ' ^ ' S 142 ��; 5 102 � l — 1 7 1 198 L 283 — "� s � O O � 1421_ �03 � I i I t99 � I 282_ � —i r — - - — 0�5 �osO — — 104—I L —185 1 200 — � L 281 3 q � � y � 8 7� '�y 1435 105 � � 184 � 201 I � 280 ' �- y 1437 �os � r ias � zoz � � Z�s 9 S — �___� - — 2 3 4 ' ! � L22968 .� 144 1445 ' � �2 N7855 �,s e � a s to ii 9 � N N N � N N N N 7 8 9 1447 " e� �- � � � � � W s BELLEVUE BLVD �4a ��::� , ��—�—N�-- --- Q� . .�481,. . ., .14 �ao� � . ...`. ••1A52. eo 1453 ii 12 ��.�.. �f'•' .:18'�•945 .1Ab�'•:a'•• ��a9..ya�'a• 1 � Oj;•. � �145��. ••' :943 ' :� '.;•; .�' .°�;_• .•^ 1457 yt; -..•.•2,,`�.• .�i7.:'..c", -�._'1457.•'r`z '. •�7'1 5�._. z t � 148 � �' ' � :1,1�.. � 13 O ��.' ,.�AB;:',' ;:- •.•74 8�:: ._ � :•. � �•'-',';:: .�' ::��'-: . 14 � yf_ "��,�•a•'� ��ts� ... '�.�•�d81•�".�''� ��..148Q �'u.•. ,,1d$'f�3�r�� 1 �' `1487 '.' .4¢B �� ;'• . •� •': :, ' '.�_ . •• - w 4 °�5'' '. 1485•.e�4'' . .p5'•..•. •'�'•�94�Sa.. 1 e�.--�. !4 ��,4 1479 io 1470 1471 �,;� •��. ' --• ..',.e 148'4 .a:.. '.. •- •. 8 143� 9 147 5 O•''aa.'� :7`.�•�i4X1.6' Q� •14::.�,q�� . �" ,�� ' 1a 1158 1e� 1499 e ` •'/A�7'�. . ..e c{• . ... • . .. 1478 p` EXISTING CONDITIONS Owner: Salvatore Belloise Case: FLD2011-09031 Site: 1421 S Missouri Ave Property Size: 0.24 Acres PIN: 22-29-15-78552-001-0040 Atlas Page: 314B - I .r .`n `%�+fk� � �`�'j � F � I' r �� ' 1 ;, ,� ' .' '- � e �; � . , , . �"- i� �� o R i � }� ? ? M � S . �r �a� � � °" ��'� ' ` � a �i � ��`�� :�� , � °� ��', I-� `� ,��%+ r' i � �� + '�� r � � ` �� > �� .� -�. � .... . � . l. ' =.�.1�1 .�.t ;.: . 4. , �� . � �� ..�. �R,�. . � � � � '� � � , > � �" ;� y .1 e � , �z w ! . r ` ~a ��'� t,�� ; � �� l � a :` . e a r�a :� _ ,,,. Y� � ',�„t�� ' � �� `,�. � �' �L"Ll�' �' _ �, � ,� � - - - �'.; ':' II; . �.�. � �� , � � , � v1 �L�` , . � � I�_•� �~. T. ,. . . . M r �: " ' • �� : J J . u . ��_ � k `x i�.� � J J � � ,.� � i . e ��:�t JJ� =!J �� '� �.�� I .��.) 1 � ' ' � ' "" # �� t��,� �j+ . . ��,�-° f,�,�3f, � �1, '� . . . . , > . iS ��' �. k '+ 4E .�; s' . .'i ., r . . f � � i i�_ ' 4� � ,,� ,.r� �� „ 5� _ �,y � ` "�; � .�t�'�� '#,:, "'I � �._�z�r � �. �r; � =L - %L�L ;L l'L ` �� 1� — 4 � . �,. . 1� �. .� � `1 5�� '^ . . �, „�:� � t � � � �r ! ql �. ,0 1-.� ' �, �J �, � ,� �,J� i "a _ � , �9" ':.l}h � p 6�s F ,� iR i �f �.' ;,':; h � •�� _ � � -�. .� J � A �• .t J� ;.�'.. � � ,h E� " � ^ � �r � • �'1i � �t p'"t �i r' J {', ; ,• ` ' ' �� , � „ • � . i _ � > , • � ..� �� dr � / n � ,,- _� . :� ,�: � ? .� , � . . . +, �� , � _ � � • � � � ,€i �� .1� AERIAL Owner: Salvatore Belloise Case: FLD2011-09031 Site: 1421 S Missouri Ave Property Size: 0.24 Acres PIN: 22-29-15-78552-001-0040 Atlas Page: 314B :�—•—•�-�.....�� —___ � i � � � � �� , � � � �= '��_�� _ . . � � - - :. �� x � . . � �� - „ > �-. . � . i � $.{.�� , .._�.... �� a . .. .�3. �� ' .. �!` �', . .�4i.�'" . r�r;.'' ;y .� , :....�;�:�;_:: View from southwest corner of property looking northeast. View from property looking south along S.Missouri Ave. � I /�s.;:��;. .� k E . � � TM.i��' � t 1 r P 1� w �. ,_ ._ ..� �,�.�a. ,.. wP� - �.... � /AMIII�� . �. , a ... �. _ e��.3'3�. ryN^h x, �. r.... r dM.� ..u,u�.�a...s..,. ...:_... , .� �U� .a '+��,�. .. ...,.... . . . .�.,,. ....� . �}� �� % �ti' ��f t��y.�'� � � y Looking north along S.Missouri from property. Looking west from property directly across S.Missouri Ave. :_i � f .�� ' ;- r� �� . �� : . 5 � a- , � ��. �� '� � . � ��.*tA� . 4� > r',ii' �~ . . , 9� i2 �i � 1 5 � ',�.• �vt � :k ��}f \ � +r � N � , �..,.. c._. . �4 �g$� ? �e � ,� : . . �:, . ., .. ...: ..-,....:.... 0 ._ . �j�.�„��i� _ i ' �� _`'s ,�):� � "':�;A �,.,,�_,r u � ' r t �r ��IIIIIlB��,�i ��o�� '��'�-� ,� � I�""' �� . .�, '.�- � �� e� .�"�Y f�N^.t�S ��: . S .�s'n �y.:� .. , ' ..N. y�. . . . ss,, - R' t +r :!. �. .�,. r � .� .. � . . .�_. ._ .�. � kq: ,f � '� r� c�Y. i�,.;�..,;, �� '��,,t�y�.+,i ;.� vy�p'� a, . vi. _ �,. t"��; ' ' .. � ,. .. �i ..,, .. ..: � , r .� i�.: �a� ,�... ��:� .. , _ � View from street looking east at existing northern property View looking south at adjacent property. landscape buffer. 1421 South Missouri Avenue FLD2011-09031 � Civil L�nd Planning Due [?iligenee Reports �s,. �. Re-Zoning,Land Use,Annexation �w,��lt�f+%t�(�1'lf��f �: U"'tG��1 ��C�. Stormwater Management Utility Design November 9, 2011 T,-affic ConsCrt.�cr.ion Adrninistration City of Clearwater � Planning & Development Review Department A. Scott Kurleman, Planner III 100 S. Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, Florida 33756 RE: FLD2011-09031 - 1421 S. Missouri Avenue Salvatore�elloise,Applicant '; ' Dear Mr. Kurleman, Below please find our responses to the DRC comments associated with the above referenced project: Engineering Review Public Utilities: Prior to CBD: 1. Acknowledged, if clean out does not exist, one shall be installed before construction is complete; please see Note added to Civil Sheet C2.1. GN: #1 - Regarding infrastructure modifications and responsibilities is hereby acknowledged. GN: #2—Acknowledged, DRC is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may be forth coming. Environmental Review 1. DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. _ Fire Review l. Please see revised C2.1 for Fire hydrant location. The hydrant is located just south of the property along the same side of the street as the building and is within 300' of building. 3q0 So�a�h Q�:Icr7�r' Ro��3cl Clearwaeer,f=1c>rida :��"l'E�`i 1 [ech(i��nor�rhsidG�:ngiriec;ri��,gser•viees.c:c>m 727�4�#;� �8F�9 �ax 727 ��16 f�U36 , Plannin� Review 1. Acknowledged, Condition of Approval will require that the proposed Office portion (800 sq. ft.) be used for an office use. 2. Acknowledged, Please see revised proposed elevations providing a cohesive decorative awning along the west and south elevations of the building extending to the northwest corner of the building for continuity. Please see revised narrative for addition discussion. 3. Please see the revised Sheet L1.1; Landscape plan provides a new area of plantings along the rear of the building with updates provided to the landscaping along the north side of the building. 4. Acknowledged, Please see revised Civil Sheet C2.1 for note indicating proposed demolition of the 6' wooden fence restricting access to the rear of the building as per your request. 5. Acknowledged, please see revised Sheet L1.1; Landscape plan provides updates to the area along the north side of the building. Please see revised narratives for additional discussion. 6. As per our conversation at DRC the barrels will be r�iled to the street by way of the sidewalk along the rear and then down the driveway; the proposed staging area has been area has been downsized. Please see revised Civil Sheet C2.1 � 7. Acicnowledged, please see revised parking layout. 8. Acknowledged, Condition of Approval will require that a building permit be obtained for all parking, landscape and irrigation improvements and all improvements are required to be completed prior to issuance of a business tax receipt or cert�ficate of occupancy. 9. Parking spaces have been revised and no longer project �eyond the property boundary to the north. With the provided revisions additional easement/agreement should no longer be necessary. 10. Please see note added to Civil Sheet C2.1 as per your request associated with the Free Standing Sign. 11. Please see revised Data Table on Civil Sheet C.1.1; ISR number has been revised and correctly reflects the Impervious Ratio for the site. 12. Please see the revised plan L1.1 providing improved landscape design in all available open areas; please also see revised Narrative and Comprehensive Landscape Application. 13. Acknowledged, 14 copies of revised signed and sealed plans provided with this resubmission. z � � Solid Waste Review l. Acknowledged, a staging area has been provided for the Black Barrels at the rear of the building and we hereby ackr►owledge, the business personnel will be required to bring barrels to the curb on collection day and abide by Solid Waste code requirements for Black Barrel service. Stormwater Review 1. Acknowledged, DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may be forthcoming Ltpon submitta.l of a Building Permit Application. Traffi� E�tgi�eering Revie�►�v Prior ta review by th� �a�munity Development Board: 1. Parking stall lengths provid�� please �e� revised Civil Sheet C2.1. P��lcing layout in the rear of the building has been redesigned ar�d provides th� rzquired 24' backup in all areas; this parking area will be for staff use only and each space has been deiineated as such. 2. Please see revised Civil Sheet C2.1 providing the requested accessible path from the building entrance to the public sidewalk compliant with Florida Building Code Chapter 11; Section 11- 4.3.2 as well as FDOT requirements. 3. Please see revised Civil Sheet C2.1 providing the location of the neighboring southern parking spaces; a dimension of 16' has been provided on the plan. Please note: a vehicle backing out of the accessible space will have over 24' of maneuverability behind the accessible space and should not experience difficulties. We trust this information is sufficient to respond to the DRC comm�nts and allow the project to move forward to the Community Development Board. Please feel free to contact us if you have questions or require additional information and we will respond immediately. Sincerely, t , R nee Ruggiero, Senior roject Plann�r Northside Engineering S��vicess Ir�c. 3 " Planning Department CASE #: '�� .t�� 100 South Myrtle Avenc�� RECEIVF_D BY (staff initials): Clearwater, Florida 33755 �ATE RECEIVED: , Telephone: 727-562-4567 � Fax: 727-562-4865 ❑ SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION ❑ SUBMIT 14 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION-Plans and application are required to be collated,stapled,and folded into sets ❑ SUBMIT FIRE PRELIMARY SITE PLAN:$200.00 ❑ SUBMITAPPLICATION FEE$ * NOTE: 15 TOTAL SETS OF INFORMATION REQUIRED (APPLICATIONS PLUS SITE PLAN SETS) FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION Comprehensive Infill_EZedevelopment Project (Revised C17/11/2008) �PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT� A. APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A) APPLICANT NAME: Salvatore Belloise MAILING ADDRESS: 914 Narcissus Avenue, Clearwater"�each, FL 33767 PHONE NUMBER: 727-449-2700 FAX NUMBER: CELLNUMBER �727-7709-1272.. � EMAIL: salbelloise@tampabay.rr.com PROPERTY OWNER(Sl: Saivatore Belloise List ALL owners on the deed Housh Ghovaee, CEO AGENTNAME: Northside Ena,ineering Services, Inc. Renee Ruggiero, Ser.ior Project Planner MAILINGADDRESS: 300 S. Belcher Road, Clearwat�:r, FL 33756 — ---__._._________--.._.�__.._._------ --....._--------____T_.�.--- ..�. PHONE NUMBER: 727-443-2869 �JlX RJ�1AEiER: 727-443-8036 CELLNUMBER: 727-235-8475 (Renee Ruggiero) EMAIL: Renee@northsideengineering.net B. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A) PROJECT NAME: 1421 S. Missouri Avenue PROJECT VALUATION: $ 33,000.00 STREETADDRESS 1421 S. Missouri Avenue PARCELNUMBER(S): 22/29/15/78552/001/0040 � PARCEL SIZE(acres): 0.24 Acres PARCEL SIZE(square feet): 10,463 s.f. LEGALDESCRIPTION: See Attached Legal Description PROPOSED USE(S): Retai/Office �� DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST: See Attached Narrative Specifically identify the request � (include number of units or square footage of non-residential use and all requested code deviations;e.g. reduction in required number of ----..._.--- ---.----.--.- _.__.....__...-.---._._._-_-----.-----.----.--^_._. parking spaces,specific use,etc.) C:\Documents and Settings\derek.ferguson\Gesktop\plan,�ing dept forms 0708\Comprehensive Infill Project(FLD)2008 07-11.doc Page 1 of8'° DOES THIS APPLICATION INVOLVE THE TRANSFER OF DEVEL��PMENT RIGHTS (TDR), A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED PLANNED UNI DEVELOPMENT, OR A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED(CERTIFIED)SITE F'LAN? YES_ NO X (if yes,attach a copy of the applicable documents) C. PROOF OF OVIINERSHIP: (Code Section 4-202.A.5) ❑ SUBMIT A COPY OF THE TITLE INSURANCE PO�ICY, DEED TO THE PROPERTY OR SIGN AFFIDAVIT'ATTESTING OWNERSHIP (see page 7) _ - D. WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Sec,tion 3-913.A) ❑ Provide complete responses to the six(6)GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA—Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail: 1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the sc,ale, bulk,coverage,density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. See Attached Narrative 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. See Attached Narrative 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use. See Attached Narrative 4. The proposed development is designed td minimize traffic congestion. See Attached Narrative 5. The proposed development is consistent yyith the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. ......... See Attached Narrative - 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts, on adjacent properties. See Attached Narrative C:1Documents and Settings\derek.ferguson\Desktop\planning de;pt forms 0708\Comprehensive Infill Project(FLD)2008 07-11.doc Page:2 of 8 WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project Criteria) ❑ Provide cornplete responses to the six(6)COMPREHENSIVE INFILL.REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT CRITERIA—Explain how each criteria is achieved,in detail: 1. The developrnent or redevelopment is otherwise impractical without deviations from the use and/or development standards set forth in this zoning district. See Attached Narrative 2. The developrnent or redevelopment will be consistent with the ga�ls and policies of the Comprehensive Plan, as well as with the general purpose, intent and basic planning objectives of this Code,and with the intent and purpose of this zoning district See Attached Narrative 3. Th2 ue�2lopment or redevelopment�h�ill not impede the r.ormal and or�erl;�development an�improvemprt nf surroundinca�roperties. See Attached Narrative 4. Adjoining properties will not suffer substantial detriment as a result of the proposed development. See Attached Narrative 5. The proposed use shall otherwise be permitted by the underlying future I�r� us� category, be compatible with adjacent land uses, will not substantially alter the essential use characteristics of the neighborhood; and shall demonstrate compliance with one or more of the following objectives: a. The proposed use is permitted in this zoning district as a minimum standard,flexible standard or flexible development use; b. The proposed use would be a significant economic contributor to the City's economic base by diversifying the local economy or by creating jobs; c. The development proposal accommodates the expansion or redevelopment of an existing economic contributor; d. The proposed use provides for the provision of affordable housing; e. The proposed use provides for development or redevelopment in an area that is characterized by other similar development and where a land use plan amendment and rezoning would result in a spot land use or zoning designation;or f. The proposed use provides for the development of a new and/or preservation of a working waterfront use. See Attached Narrative 6. Flexibility with regard to use, lot width,required setbacks, height and off-street parking are justified based on demonstrated compliance with all of the following design objectives: a. The proposed development will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of the surrounding properties for uses permitted in this zoning district; b. The proposed development complies with applicabie design guidelines adopted by the City; c. The design,scale and intensity of the proposed development supports the established or emerging character of an area; d. In order to form a cohesive,visually interesting and attractive appearance,the proposed development incorporates a substantial number of the following design elements: ❑ Changes in horizontal building planes; ❑ Use of architectural details such as columns,cornices,stringcourses,pilasters,porticos,balconies,railings,awnings,etc.; ❑ Variety in materials,colors and textures; ❑ Distinctive fenestration pattems; ❑ Building stepbacks;and � ' ❑ Distinctive roofs forms. e. The proposed development provides for appropriate buffers,enhanced landscape design and appropriate distances between buildings. See Attached Narrative C:\Documents and Settings\derek.ferguson\Desktop\planning dept forms 0708\Comprehensive Infili Project(FLD)2008 07-11.doc . PagE.3 of 8 ' E. STORMWATER PLAN SUBMITTAL R'�QUIREMENTS: (City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteria Manual and 4-202.A.21) ❑ A STORMWATER NARRATIVE MUST BE SUBMITTED WITH ALL APPLICATIONS.Ail applications that involve addition or modification of impervious surface, including buildings, must include a stormwater plan that demonstrates compliance with the City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteria manual.A reduction in impervious surface area does not qualify as an exemption to this requirement. ❑ If a plan is not required,the narrative shali provide an explanation as to why the site is exempt. ❑ At a minimum,the STORMWATER PLAN shall inciude the following; ❑ Existing topography extending 50 feet beyond all property lines; ❑ Proposed grading including finished floer elevations of all structures; ❑ All adjacent streets and municipal storm syst�ms; ❑ Proposed stormwater detention/retention area including top of bank,toe of slope and outlet control structure; ❑ A narrative describing the proposed stormwater control plan including all calcu�stions and data necessary to demonstrate compliance with the City manuai. ❑ Proposed stormwater detention/retention area including top of bank,toe of slope and outlet control structure; ❑ Signature and seal of Florida Registered Professional Engineer on all plans and calculations. ❑ COPY OF PERMIT INQUIRY LETTER OR SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT (SWFWMD) PERMIT SUBMITTAL(SWFWMD approval is required prior to issuance of City Building Permit),if applicable ❑ ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF STORMWATER PLAN REQUIREMENTS(Applicant must initial one of the following): Stormwater plan as noted above is included Stormwater pian is not required and explanation narrative is attached. At a minimum, a grading plan and finished floor H.G. elevations shall be provided. CAUTION — IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A STORMWATER PLAN AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED,APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements,contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at(727)562-4750. F. SUPPLEMENTAL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 4-202.A) ❑ SIGNED AND SEALED SURVEY(including legal description'of property)-One original and 14 copies; ❑ TREE SURVEY (including existing trees on site;;and within 25' of the adjacent site, by species, size (DBH 4" or greater), and location, including drip lines and indicating trees to be,removed)-please design around the existing trees; No Trees Exist on Site. ❑ TREE INVENTORY; prepared by a "certified arborisY', of all trees 4" DBH or greater, reflecting size, canopy(drip lines) and condition of such trees; No Trees Exist on Site. ❑ LOCATION MAP OF THE PROPERTY; ❑ PARKING DEMAND STUDY,4in conjunction with a request to make deviations to the parking standards (ie. Reduce number of spaces). Prior to the submittal of this applicatidn,the methodology of such study shall be approved by the Community Development Coordinator and shall be in accordance with accepted traffi�engineering principles. The findings of the study will be used in determining whether or not deviations to the parking standards are approved; - _ - ❑ GRADING PLAN, as applicable; ❑ PRELIMINARY PLAT, as required(Note: Building permits will not be issued until evidence of recording a final plat is provided); ❑ COPY OF RECORDED PLAT, as applicable; C:\Documents and Settings\derek.ferguson\Desktoplplanning dept forms 0708\Comprehensive Infill Project(FLD)2008 07-11.doc Page 4 of 8 G. SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A) ❑ SITE PLAN with the following information(not to exceed 24"x 36"): Index sheet referencing individual sheets included in package; North arrow; Engineering bar scale(minimum scale one inch equals 50 feet),and date prepared; All dimensions; Footprint and size of all EXISTING buildings and structures; � Footprint and size of all PROPOSED buildings and structures; � All required setbacks; � All existing and proposed points of access; � Ail required sight triangles; � Identification of environmentally unique areas, such as watercourses, wetlands, tree masses, and specimen trees, including description and location of understory,ground cover vegetation and wildlife habitats,etc;Location of all public and private easements; � Location of all street rights-of-way within and adjacent to the site; � Location of existing public and private utilities, including fire hydrants, storm and sanitary sewer lines, manholes and lift stations, gas and water lines; w All parking spaces,driveways, loading areas and vehicular use areas; � Depiction by shading or crosshatching of all rec�uired parking lot interioriandscaped areas; Location of all solid waste containers, recycling or trash handling areas and outside mechanical equipment and all required screening {per Section 3-201(D)(i)and Index#701}; � Location of all landscape material; � Location of all onsite and offsite storm-water management facilities; T Location of all outdoor lighting fixtures; � Locaition of all existing and proposed sidewalks;and Y Floor plari typicals of buildings for all Level Two approvals. A floor plan of each floor is required for any parking garage requiring a Level Two approval. ° - •.•.. ❑ SITE DATA TABLE for existing, required,and proposed development,in written/tabular form: _. . �XISTING REQUIRED PROPOSED Land area in square feet and acres; � Number of EXISTING dwelling units; See Site Data Table Provided on Civil Plans m Number of PROPOSED dwelling units; � ` � _ � Gross floor area devoted to each use; Parking spaces: total number, presented in tabular form with the number of required spaces; Y_.�^ _� ___. � Total paved area, including all paved parking spaces & driveways, expressed in square feet&percentage of the paved vehicular area; __ � Official records book and page numbers of all existing utility easement; Building and structure heights; � Impermeabie surface ratio(I.S.R.);and � Floor area ratio(F.A.R.)for all nonresidential uses. __ __ _ �� _ __�_____� ❑ REDUCED COLOR SITE PLAN to scale(8'/zX 11); ❑ FOR DEVELOPMENTS OVER ONE ACRE, provide the following additional information on site plan: One-foot contours or spot elevations on site; � Offsite elevations if required to evaluate the proposed stormwater management for the parcel; v All open space areas; � Location of all earth or water retaining walls and earth berms; � Lot lines and building lines(dimensioned); Streets and drives(dimensioned); Building and structural setbacks(dimensionedf; � '``�' ` ' Structural overhangs; C:\Documents�nc3 Setiings\derek.ferguson\Desktop\planning dept forms 0708\Comprehensive Infill Project(FLD)2008 07-11.doc Page 5 of 8 H. LANDSCAPING PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-1102.A) ❑ LANDSCAPE PLAN with the following information(not to exceed 24"x 36"): Ali existing and proposed structures; Names of abutting streets; ' � Drainage and retention areas inciuding swales,side slopes and bottom elevations; ! Delineation and dimensions of all required perimeter landscape buffers; �� Sight visibility 4riangles, � Delineation and dimensions of all parking areas including landscaping islands and curbing; Existing trees on-site and immediately adjacent to the site, by species, size and locations, including driplines(as indicated on required tree survey); � Location, size; and cauantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, indicated by a key relating to the plant schedule; _ � Plant schedule with a key(symbol or�ahel) indicating the size, description, specifications, quant�±:2�, and spacing requirements of all existing and proposed landscape materials,including botanical and common names; � Typical planting details for trees, palms, shrubs and ground cover plants i�cluding instructions, soil mixes, backfilling, mulching and protective measures; � Interior landscaping areas hatched and/or shaded and labeled and interior landscape coverage, expressing in both square feet and percentage covered; � Conditions of a previous development approval(e.g.conditions imposed by the Community Development Board); � Irrigation notes. ❑ REDUCED COLOR LANDSCAPE PLAN to scale(8'/ZX 11); ❑ ,COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM application, as applicable. Landscape associated with the Comprehensive Landscape Program shall exceed minimum Code requirements to offset the areas where minimum Code will not be met. I. BUILDING ELEVATION PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A.23) ❑ BUILDING ELEVATION DRAWINGS—with the following information: All sides of all buildings Dimensioned Colors(provide one full sized set of colored elevations) Materials ❑ REDUCED BUILDING ELEVATIONS—same as above to scale on 8 Y�X 11 J. SIGNAGE: �€)�v��i�t� �i9. SIGNS/SeCtion 3-1806) *****No New signage Proposed At This Time**** ❑ All EXISTlNG freestanding and attached signs; Provide photographs and dimensions (area, height, etc.), indicate whether they will be removed or to remain. ❑ All PROPOSED freestanding ar.d attached signs; Provide details including location, size, height, colors, materials and drawing; freestanding signs shall include the street a�dress(numeraEs) - ❑ Comprehensive Sign Program application,as applicable(s�parate applicar�r�riu fee required). ❑ Reduced signage proposal(8 Yz X 11) (color),if submitting Comprehensive Sign Program application. C:\Documents and Settings\derek.ferguson\Desktop\planning dept forms 0708\Comprehensive Infill Project(FLD)2008 07-11.doc Page 6 of 8 K. TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY: (Section 4-202.A.13 and 4-801.C) ❑ Include if required by the Traffic Operations Manager or his/her designee or if the proposed development: • Will degrade the acceptable level of service for any roadway as adopted in the Comprehensive Plan. • Will generate 100 or more new vehicle directional trips per hour and/or 1000 or more new vehicle trips per day. • Will affect a nearby roadway segment and/or intersection with five(5)reportable accidents within the prior twelve(12)month period or that is on the City's annual list of most hazardous intersections. Trip generation shall be based on the most recent edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineer's(ITE)Trip General Manual. The Traffic Impact Study must be prepared in accordance with a "Scoping Meeting" held with the Traffic Operations Manager and the Planning Department's Development Review Manager oe their designee(727-562-4750) Refer to Section 4-801 C of the Community Development Code for exceaiions to,this requirement. ❑ Acknowledgement of traffic impact study requirements(Applicant must initial one of the following): i i aiflC IiTiFaCY SiUuy i5 iiiC�iiu2u.i�iE SfUu}i iiiiiSi IfiCiJuc 8 SUiiliiiaiy tabic ui Ni c-a�u�70St-�2V2ICpiii2iit I�V2IS Of SEIVICE TOi'a�� roadway legs and each t�rning movement at all intersections identified in the Scoping Meeting. HG Traffic Impact Study is not required. CAUTION — IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMIT7ED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY IV1�4Y OCCUR. if you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 562- 4750. L. FIRE FLOW CALCULATIONS/WATER STUDY: Provide Fire Flow Calculations.Water Study by a FIRE PROTECTION ENGINEER to assure an adequate water supply is available and to determine if any upgrades are required by the devaloper due to the impact of this project. The water supply must be ab�e to support the needs of any required fire sprinkler, standpipe and/or fire pump. If a fire pump is required the water supply must be able to supply 150%of its rated capacity. Compliance with the 2004 Florida Fire Prevention Code to include NFPA 13, MFPA 14, NFPA 20, NFPA 291,and MFPA 1142(Annex H)is required. ❑ Acknowledgement of fire flow calculations/water study requirements(ApplicanE must initial one of the following): Fire Flow Calculations/VVater Study is included. HG Fire Flow Calculations/Water Study is not required. CAUTION — IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A FIRE FLOW CALCULATIONS/ WATER STUDY AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements,contact the City Fire Prevention Department at(727)562-4334. M. SIGNATURE: I,the undersigned,acknowledge that al�representations made S?A.Tc OF FLORIDA,COUNTY OF PINELLAS in t is pplication are true and accurate to the best�f my Sworn to and subscribed before me this_.�1 day of kn wl dge and authorize City representatives to visit and }�U4 US 'r" A.D.201�to me and/or by p to raph the property described in this application. ��{s�¢_V��_ who is personally known has � pr duced i '"�FR''��'o RAMAdOEL asidentification. � � / ,Y,�� + ,� MY COMMISSION#DD 949832 p • • �� _� ' BES:May 3,2-0 .I"�—��.....--- � . ��'_ Sign ure of property owner or representatis�'"F�O�\� Baided Thm Budget Nofary S �rY Public, y commission expires: (�1/��I �{� °�b�� / C:1Documents and Settingslderek.ferguson\De�l<toplplanning dept forms 0708\Comprehensive Infill Project(FLD)2008 07-11.doc Page 7 of 8 N. AFFIDAVIT TO AUTHORIZE AGENT: 1. Provide names of all property owners on deed-PRINT full names: Salvatore Belloise 2. That(I am/we are)the owner(s)and record title holder(s)of the following described property(address or general location): 1421 South Missouri Avenue Clearwater, FL 33756 3. That this property constitutes the property for which a request for a:(describe request) Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Application to allow retail and office use on the above referenced property. 4. That the undersigned(has/have)appointed and(does/do)appoint: Northside Engineering Services, Inc. Housh Ghovaee, Ceo and/or Renee Ruggerio, 5enior Project Planner as(his/their)agent(s)to execute any petitions or other documents necessary to affect such petition; 5. That this affidavit has been executed to induce the City of Clearwater, Florida to consider and act on the above described property; �,,_�.,� 6. That site visit�5 to the property are necessary by City representatives in order to process this application and the owner authorizes City representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application; e �it " �,,„...,W.a�,. 7. That(I/we),th ,ndersigned a�fhority,her� y certify that the foregoing is true and correct. r� � �;. .. . > (4,,.°'"L......,..�,,,�_ ___ �».,., „_, -- ,�. .. _.__ . . - ------ ---__-------------—____ :..� °� ; � Property Owner vatore Belloise Property Owner � — ------ -----_ _._---------------- ----_------------------ - Property Owner Property Owner STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS �-'°'��t Before me the undersigned,an officer duly commissioned by the laws of the State of Florida,on this �_ day of �(�jt,'� __� , o�L3� l__ personally appeared ��_��_��,__ who having been first duly sworn Deposes and says that he/she fully understands the contents of the a�davit that he/she signed. NOTARY PUBLIC-STAT�OF FT.OKTUA ,.-� � Vincent Bedami '� �,.,,,, /,, ��'`-Commission#Dn833963 — •,,�„�o`E7Cpli'es: OCT.26,2012 �/ Notary Public Signature Notary Seal/Stamp BONDED 11iFiU ATLANTIC BOffiING CO3 INC. My Commission Expires: _��f L�__ C:�Documents and Settings\derek.ferguson\Desktop�pianning dept forms 0708\Comprehensive Infill Project(FLD)2008 07-11.doc Page 8 of 8 State of ��_..,. The foregoing instrument was acknowledge before me this J�� day County of �tr�.p,l�a-S of�_, 201 l, by �c�.�(1�.1-�-c;,w��_ .I�f�s�as who is personally known to me or who has produced �L �� as identification and who did (did not) take an oath. ,/ / � ir� Notary Public � ignature� Commission# D n S',��11�;� NOTARY 1�U13LiC-6TAx��F�i2I�t�— ""'°• Vincent Bedami ( ) �,' ;Commission#DD8339� rY YP P ) SEAL ABOVE ��1�Name of Nota T ed, Printed or Stam ed ..,,,,.•� � • 8(INDED T1iRU ATLANTIC BONnWG CO.,INC. LETTER O� AUTHORIZATItJN This letter will serve as authorization for Housh Ghovaee (agent Name) with Northside Enqineerinct Services, Inc. to act as an agent for Salvatore Belloise (Property Owner's Name) And to execute any and all documents related to securing permi#s and approvals for the construction on the property generally located at 1421 Missouri Avenue, Clearwater, Florida (Property Location) r�",� PINE�LAS County, State of FLORIDA. r4�` �,M� � � ' Salvatore Belloise �t�' �� A�i��! rca��._�C--�Z��S� Signature of Property Owner Print Name of Property Owner 914 Narcissus Avenue Property Owner Clearwater Beach,Florida 33767 Address of Property Owner Title Clearwater Beach, Florida 33767 727-�49-2700 City/State/Zip Code Telephone Number I#: 2011285123 BK: 17392 PG: 2581, 10/27/2011 at 01:55 PM, RECORDING 2 PAGE5 $18.5,0 D DQC STAMP COLLECTION $875.00 KEN BURKE, CLERK OF COURT PINELI�S COUNTY, FL BY DEPUTY CLERK: CLKDUI3 � ��u.x➢nLtY iO V� � las,om.c.x� i Corporate Warranty Deed � �'� „ I TUis Indenture, made,October 17,201 I A.D. � � � � i Between '�--� , Bay To Gulf Hoidings,LLC whose post office address is:4302 Henderson Blvd, _ --__ Suite 120,Taznpe,FL 33629 a corporation exisiing under the laws of the State of � � � Florida,Grantor and Salvatore Belloise,a married man whose post office address `\� `�" i � is:914 Nazcissus Avenue,Clearwater Beach,FL 33767,Gcantee, � <� � ' . �. . � ,' -- �. Witnesseth,that the said Grantor,for and in consideration of the sum of Ten and No1100 Dollars($10.00 ),to it in hand� i `�� , paid by tt�e said Grantee,the receipt whereof is hereby aclmowledged,has ganted,6azgained and sold to the said Grantee forever,the i � + i following described land,situate,lying and being in the County of Pinellas, State of Florida,to wit: _ ��. i � � , . -. -_ � ' -- That pert of Lots 4 and 5,Block A,SECOND ADDITION TO SALLS SUBDIVISION,in Section 22, i �� `��, ` � Township 29 South,Rsnge IS East,as per plat thereof recorded in Plat Book 35,Page 6,of the Public � � � � Records of Pinellas County,Florida: �� Lying within 60 feet of the survey line of State Road 5-595-A,Section 15570,South of Statian 1033+65.00, �- lying withln 65 feet of said survey line,between Station 1033+65.00 and Station 1034+45.00,IyinP'within 60 feet of said survey line Northerly of Station 1034+45.00,said survey line sud stations being describEavnd located as follows: $egin at the NW comer of the South 1/4 of Section 22,Township 29 South,Rauge 15 Eas�,sai�.COtaer being,�� 1323.45 feet Westedy of the NE corner of the IVW 1/4 of the SE 1/4 of said Section 22;run�th`�ncy Soa�h��, 0°19'i8"East,290.86 feet to Station 1034+45.00;cont3nue thence South 0°19°18��'ast,80.�,feet to Statio6 1033+65.00;continue thence South 0°19'18"East,2282.19 feet to the SW corner of�he SE 1/�of seid Section 22,said corner being 2645.31 feet Westerly of the SW corner of said Settion 2?�� , , , . � � , AND LESS the Sauth 34.50 feet of Lot 4,Block A,5ECOND ADDITION�"�l'O SALL$SJJBDIVISION,as per plat thereot recorded in Plat Book 35,Page 6,of the Public Records ot'`Pinellas Coun�y,`Florida,as conveyed by that certain Warranty Deed recorded September 7,1995 in Of'fteial Re¢ords Boo1v9100,Page 452,of the . . , Public Records of Pinellas County,Florida. ,. __ , �;. ,' . �� -- . � . Subject to ta�ces for the current yeaz,cauenants,rashi�tions ar��easements of record,if any. . . '� . ,' .� . Pazcel Identification Number:22/29/15l78552/60J/0040,'� `� . � �> \\< `J And the said Grantor does hereby fully war�anf the ritle to said lend,and will defend the same against the lawful claims of all - . � persons whomsoever. .'�__ � , � � �. . � In Witne89 Whereof, the said Grantox h9s ca�sed this instrument to he executed in its name by its duly autLorized officer and caused its wrporate seal to be affix�d the day and yFanfirst above written. � � i � :� � � � � �_ �. . •` _'-- _ .\ �� . . `� .v, �� i � �.� � i ��` � . � I Floriaa Coryo`ste DeedlLetta PINELLAS COUNTY FL OFF. REC. BK 17392 PG 2582 �� i � Bay To Gulf Holdings,LLC � �� , �,�--- — ' —_' ' I � ` —. `� . Si�ed and Sealed in Dur Presence: By: % . `� . . ntopher R Smith � " i � Its:Managing Member �' ' . .� . �� . , ��.Mo��.� °n -_ ' ;. i � , ' . � � (Corporate Seal) � i� *�� ` ` �' ' ' i � � � p � � � � j W1mmP�tNamc � ` � 'l� _ � � / , ♦\ / —� �_ �� ' State af Floride � �� -- County of Hillsborough � � ` � i � � � , � � i i The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 17th day of October,2011,by Christopher R.Smith,the Managing`Member �� of Bay To Gu1f Holdings,LLC A corporation e�cisting under the laws of the State of Florida,on bebalf of the corporation. ti_ He is personally l�own to me. .� . I � ,' Notery Publi ' • NotaryRin[edNeme: Tont�,�.��We��`� \ \ � c My Commission Expjres:: � � '�'� . \ �. Prepared by: :R•""'�. ` T�'A 9EWel1 '•: M1'�A�ISSION� D 2 Tonya Sewell,an employee of t' a��:�a�� Achieve TiBe Services,LLC., m"' �rv�4k ume,�u� 43U2 Henderson Blvd.,Suite 100 i , Tampa,Florida 33629 ,�� `� ; ; �� -- �. � File Nucnber:032382011 �� ' __, .� �� . . �� . � � `. ' . . . . . ; . �� . \ ' .� '. .;� � �� ,�> ��.. . \ - . � __ . ,' . . , . . � � �\ � � I � � � � � i � �`� � � i � i .\ `� �v� �� i � �� i �\� i i Florida Corpocate Dad/Lctter ,�� -__--„y.... ....--- -- - � � _ „ , --.-..— -... --- � � _ _ a�� :53pn ,..;;`.F ��-49?634 NQ�K 11�2? P� 1?2"1 p T"��1tUI11�II1��i1111tI1IIIIItIIIl111111111D11111 �.�'�: Il �""� ��;�. NZTJTUAL EASElVYENT DEED AND AGR�EMENT � a� . , �1ov�mlxr :.,,� �. THIS MUTUAL EASEMENT DBBD f1ND AGREEA�IENT is made diis �� day of�e�a�>2003, . -+�'� by a�ld bet�veen CPAFLA rNVESTri7ENT C�RPURATTON,whase address is 1435 Missouri Avenu�, �� ,�G,. South;Clearwater, Florida,liereinaf�er referred to as"FIRST PARTY",and MIDWAY TNVESTNIENT' �? �°�!: ` � , ,.,��-, EN'TEN.�RISE,INC.,whose address is 142� Missouri Avenue South,Clearwater,_T=Iorida,hereirraftcr'r__;�, ^�;� referred to as"SECOND PARTY", .'� ',,, "�4e- �' , � ,,,� � , ,' , , ,.,�� ;,: First Party o��ns that certain reai property situate in Pinellas County, Florida bearing the le�al�Ei,e�cXlpfion ri�,:: �!estern :"Y"� of Lot 3 and the Southem 34.5 feet of Lot 4,Block A,SALL'S 2"d ADDITION, less�b�d;on, ,;, : .. Boundary("First Party's Property"),with Second Party awning that certain ceal prop�rty sifuate in;; �y: Pine llas Count�y,Florida bearin g the legal description of the Northern 34.5 feet ofLa�4 and Lo�5, Block � ._ A, �ALL'S 2" ADDTTION, less Road on Wesk�r��undary("Second Party_-'s�'r,opr��X")_,,;.' � - , _ , ,' _ -'� Second Party's Property is appurienant ta the northern boundary oF�'irst Pa►`,ty's Pro�e�ty. First Party's �� • Propert}�and Second Party's Property s�ar�a common driveway off of Misscntri A��cnue that is the only :�",. ,. k�.. means of ingress and egress to these pr�p�erties, -- :,.�'r� ,,� �.. WXTNESSETH: That First Party apd S.econd Party, for and in capsideratiQn of$10.�0, paid by one tu �:,„�� ,,,��:_ the other,and other and mutual valuable consideration h@reirtset fdrth�t1Y�teeeipt and sufficiency of „�,;: ��•liich is hareby ae(:nowIedged by each Pai�ty,by these pr�sent�;��rst Party does hereby grant unto Second : �_+�•• Party, its successors and assigns,a perpetual,nonex��sive��eas�rneR��bver aiid upon that certain property ,.��.. locat�d in 1'inellas County,Florida,described as the Nf)�ZTI��RN TEN(10)FEET 4�THE :;;,"`, SOUT'Ii�Rl�l 3;1.5 F�ET,BLOCKA SALL'�21'��1DDIT�O'I�J; LESS ROAD Ot�1 WESTERN -�°�' � BpUN17ARY, and Second Party does heret�y;grant unte��'fx�t Party, successors and assigns,a perpetual , :.�"�. ,<��,,. noneYClusive easement over and upon tk�c�rtain prop��ty located in Pinellas County, Florida,described ' ;,;;.x,. as the SOUTHERN TCI'�I(10)FEET,OF.fi��ORT%��RN 34.5�'EET C}F LOT 4, BLOCK A, SALL'S •aa►�� .��i'r_. 2"a ADDITION,LESS ROAU OI�Y,V�ST�Bt�L1NDARY, such easements to be used solely for tl�e .,�� purpose of ingress and egress b�%the th�Parti�s;�their Iteirs,assigns, successors in interest, tenants, "�;;; invitees, licensees or guests�';� � �� _ �.„� -, ,:�':> ,�, ' . .,�.x . Provided hawever, E�ch Pa(�y hereby rzserves al[riglrt,title, interest,and privilege and the full „��„ enjoyment of land q�vr►ed��t�ai Party, and the use thereof for all purposes not inconsistent with the use ,��4 hereinabove speaifed. '�;�� - - "'" " � � � � , � � � �ach ParEy,res,esves and'c'etains all right,titIe, interest and privilege in the full use and enjoyment in, � ". over,and acrA4s�fie gas�iitent of tlieir Property for all purposes not inconsistent with the uses and rights "d, �r" grante�i"ltereafier,;�hese easements are granted by each Party and accepted by the other Party subject to „��." the'�o,l�oyZtipg�or�ditians that each Party covenants and a�rees to perform: ^�+4� ,,,,, �;;,_. C'�AGw� �,� ��1'.� �fo'use the said easement granted ta that Party with due care and good faith. ';,.;��. ACU� .,�q~} �.� To cause no unnecessary or unreasonable obstruction in the use of the other Party'stiProperty : �� C,�':; ' ° uests or tenants. "'r"` ar the parking of vehicles by the other I'arty's clients,customers, invit�es, g ..��., �i�� ,-�,� - 6., �� v�,.� 3. To use fhe easements granted hereunder in such manner as to prevent the creation of any ;a�, ��.aT tl�,t�T� obstrucfiou or condition that is ar may become hazardous ta the olher Party, its guests, ��- ��ES ,,,,�:� ernployees, invitees,licensees,or the ganeral public. �.�i iw�. fo�Tl� 4. To indemnify and hold the otlier�'��y�airmless from any,and all claims.For the pa}�menl of ;�;,;:, P(C . , � any compensation �r damages fi�r Yrnjury tc�persons(including wrongful death) or damage to .�:�.>.. �EV ,..�. ,�;4,. property resuIting from the use�±y the Party of the easemenf herein granted, together with an}�` �;�,,. TO�G��and a11 court costs and attorn��°'s fees incurred by the other Parfy in connection 4vit11 such „�+ �- � ' ;�i��.. claims. "� : - CK BA� _.---�-� . . .. .... - -.,��.. GHG AMT .----�---"-� /' , � ��- `" _�- � �. 1�f�, ka �-' >�;b:- �' � � ' � ,N � � ::,, GO � � �d�Qr c..,�� .-� .,;�;� L��. �(..,�. � ��C7� ,wk,.« �w iw,. . � __" . . .._' ' ""' ""'_ . ..:.yµ�... �' . � , ��- �, : ,,�-, ,,��. .,�,i,:. .��,}. P IN�LLRS COUNTY ��— 1�2� M''• OF'F .REC ,8K 132�7 PG ,.„� b. ,:,;�ts.. � � ..�,a;j.ila. _ml'.'« ,d+w- STATB OF FLOIZIDA ;�� '��,.n. COUNTY OF PINELLAS �, � �,��.� N„vev�bzr , �, �;y,.. Th� Foregoing instrument was acknowledged before tne this�_day of 9e�e�',2003, by DE1N-I�L�� ', ;`�;. I��I. CALHOUN,President of MIDWAY INVESTMENT ENTERI'R.ISE, INC., who is personalty k�t��v�� ,�, °'��` to me or�w�ho has produced his Florida Driver's License as identification. ,%,� � �'� - ,�;,,. , r;NY��"�, • ,Q�Of�(3EG.PAPPAS �� NOT Y PUB C-STA OF �� ^��°��s��no ao5..�ss :� '=W '�XPIRES:Jwe34,;2oC5 "a� PrintName: __ iw�;��f �Box.adThtutlotaryPuhficUnd�ni�hen �°"W'�� ..„by In,.. ' Cornmissior.No: ��,' , ` ;.: � 1�4y Cornmission Expires:� �� -�•.• � ' � ,k�i�. .� . , _� »'w� .._ . ..N.L�. G.i—. 4rj '� . ...MM7�j4k.: � �� , ...'��"... t .:��,.r;,.. . ` �� \ � +cf,`�- : � � `� . ..:y1�y.. � � � ��. �`,`�� KA�LEEN �. DE F�L�II�EKi CL.�I� �1F CL1(�'iT � ,`�'� �(`;,,,-_,, '�;; �;, �'It�LLRS COl1KC1'► FL�RIDR (7�7) 4h4��08°�� -�..,�;� °��, �, �;��, \`� ��?�1�i49 11-�1-20U3 17;52:p3 hfft(� '.�': � � ' ,',� 51 AGR-�fID��IAY INU INCRF' '�z- ' ' _="� ' 0031i�,6 ,�y�,y,,. � '� I�:0�497b34 BK:13Z27 SFG:1'�27 Ef`�s172'� -j�� ,, . � ' ,�; '�' kECQRDING 003 FAGES 1 �1�.�0 '��`�; " ' Dt� STRMP - OA21.� 3 �.7Q. "", ,� '' ,';, '' ., OF�f'TCTAL COPIE� 5 � �3.(� ��: � C�TIFCATI(�� 6 �1.00 °.� �.. .,�, -- . FEVE�lUE 13 �I.5G ,„;;'°� ,, , ., , , „ ------ .��.. ' ' � ' T�TF�; � �21."0 :;�;�,. , , � , � � ' , ',' CHECK RMT.TE}�UC�CD: 3`'�I.20;"';.�;µ , , „ ' `_ CHANGE: $.(}r� °�. ,�. '��---- _, 9Y _��''�i�F'UTY CLEFtK ""�; _ _ ;�; �.` -- __ �� . _ti, '�� .;> ;:;.;... �, ,,�;;±� � � ��,. ' ' �:��da� — ,��. � �sN.rn. �.s��yr. :.��:�'�. . ..a�y'��y'^ ...u11�iN. .nij}b w�' . � � ...y.:��...x. �:r.�'r,�� . .,.0�i,.. . ::/k.. ••41)��l:. ��p�.. yy� , +W Yr. Y1I fr� n ., ��: � , �u4��- ' " "'__"...�._. ""'"_ ' " ' "_' � "—__' � •1 ��.. � . �.y{�"�y. , � � � ';� .. •.iii k•' f'INELLAS COUNTY FLR , �- °�'° OF"F .REC .BK 13�27 PG 1728 � M�- „�y kf S. Each Party shall assume all liabilily and bear all expenses for the repair and maintenance of ' -�?� the Property consisfing of the easement being granted, Each Party shall reimburse the other `� ' 1' for costs of re air and maintenance caused b the ne li ence of that Pa its uests �4�. �' P Y g g rtS'� g > �', employees, invitees, licensees,heirs,assigns or saccessor in interest. � ','. ;.;;�; 6. Each Party understands and agrees that these easements are nonexclusive easements ancL_ �� ', °�a� agrees to use the same with due consideration for the rights of tlie property owner and ottrer-��;', ;`�� easement holders, if any. -�� ,'> ,,,� , � Novemb�r , , ` ,:�;k. EXECUTED this instrument this (a�-hciay of�et,2003. .. z- . .. . _ -- ,«� ��,' '� �� „ .,u� I I � � I 1 I 1 ��bi�'�' ` � I 1 Y�'itnesses: � � First Party: __ � ' _ � � ' CPAFLA 1'NV Ss ME.NT��'ORPD1�.Afi'�O1V -,�u:� � • . �. ' ` � � � , � .w�., � � , � ,�� . . . � , B.v: � • � �„�i,r Its:Pres t -- ' ""� �` .�� 2 �' ►� -- . � . .. �..;�-,;... AFFLX CORPCJ�ATE SE�1�,� .,,��.. ," . � K��„ ,; .�,.. \ .�. � � :b w , ,�, . � � � .„�. . S'ecohc��?arty�� '*�'�"� ,�;-]1��:�i��1KN'ESTI�IENT EN?ERP.RIS�',INC. ; ��`� : � > ��:.. . �, � ,. • �`, , r �� ` ,�, � � ��;;W. .L7L____. � ,,�� ,�- �,r . ..,i�pw �� ,�, �� : - :._ a O�y, �� .��... ; �.;�. .,.,� . �� It`s;Pr.esrdent ' "'�� . � �y y„. '�.' -- � � , .'. . > ' : ' 2 ,'�-\��,",�� AFFIX CORPORATE SEAL "�� . .;��:, �,. , .,� ., :.. � ryi!R: /�' �`� l�, �' " _ "M�V� STATE OF FLOR�DA �`,\f,� '� - . . . �.C, ��::`• COUNTY OF�PITrIL,I.LAS ' ' , , �; - _ �ove►�b�'' "�;a.. The,foregair�g�ir3strument was acknowledged before me this�_day of Llc[ebe�,-2003,by LINDA �M `� JEI�IC.TN"�-'(�'ROt�RI�EE,President aFCPAFLA INV�STMENT CORPORATION,who is personally ' ,:�`�`:. l:no�vr�,to m�,br who has produced her Florida Driver's License as i entific ion. "'� ' ' .\ ` � ,L�Y". ' � ,sa�.. � ,v_. -" NQTARY UB -S _ - ..- �,�r ..�,: 1��pAPP ,;��::. Print N e: �' � ns .�;4. .� , ,aF ��{�1��516N$DD 005586 � " Commission No s � ;; �€d�Junv3d,2oo3 + -�' � My Commission�xpires: - �0n��Y�EUndimdun i ,�`"M . �±w � ."i�� .<�'k.., .,,�i .. �u;j��- ..,g y�. ..,n4�„,_ arii' . •ce�k ,�,F. a*�,. q � ,� . . . . .. ., ��.e�u'�k.. . LE�AL DESCR/PTION LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lots 4 and 5, Block 'A" SECOND ADDITION TO SALLS SUBDIVISION, as per plat thereofrecorded in Plat Book 35, Page 6, of the Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida. LESS and EXCEPT that po�tion of Lots 4 and 5 as shown in that certain Final Judgment recorded in Official Records Book 3925, Page 639, and being further described as fol%ws: That part of Lots 4 and 5, Block A, SECOND ADDITION TO SALLS SUBDIVISION, in Section 22, Township 29 �outh, r'�ange ��asr, as per p1�t thereof recorded in Plat Book 35, Page 6, of the Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida: Lying within 60 feet of the survey line of State Road S-595 A, Section �557�, South of Station �033+65.00, lying within 65 feet of said survey line, between Station �033+65.00 and Station 1034+45 00, lying within 60 feet of said survey line Northerly of Station �034+45.00, said survey line and stations being described an located as fol%ws: Beg�n at#he NW corner of the South �/4 of Section 22, Township 29 South, Range �5 E�st, said corner being 9323.45 feet Weste�ly of the NE corner of the NW 1/4 of the SE �/4 of said Section 22; run thence South 0°�9'�8"East, 290.86 feet to Station �034+45.00; continue thence South 0°�9'�8" East, 80.0 feet to Station �033+65.00; continue a thence South 0°�9'�8"East, 2282. �9 feet to the g SW corner of the SE �/4 of said Section 22, said c corner being 2645.3� feet Westerly of the SW 3 corner of said Section 22. AND LESS the South 34.50 feet of Lot 4, Block A, � SECOND ADDITION TO SALLS SUBDIVISION, as � per plat thereof recorded in P/at Book 35, Page 6, � of the Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida, � v as conveyed by that certain Warranty Deed a recorded September 7, �995 in O�cia/Records � Book 9�00, Page 452, of the Public Records of ~ Pinellas County, Florida. , ,_ � � The parcel described above contains 0.24 acres, ` more or less. N IV � Civil Lancl Planning - Due Diligence Reports r �� Re-Zaning,Land Use,Annexation i'.;.te'��t'�'L'°tt''�t� ��"��'$tG��'��'� �,;�v2('�, St;ormwaxer Management Utility Design Traffic Conslruction Administ;ration November 10, 2011 DRAINAGE NARRATIVE 1421 Missouri Avenue Clearwater, Florida 33756 The existing developed site does not provide a retention basin, and currently drains to the roadways via sheet flow. a :r`.a,� ., . � . Our Civil design primaril� i��de�. xe-stri;ping of parking spaces and the addition of an ADA Rar�h� �`�?yit�°�w ex'isting asphalt in most cases is shown to remain. , A small increase in the overall open space is proposed from 8.4% to 9% providing irnproved conditions. Based upon the scope of the project �nd ihe abave in�ormation no new retention basin is required. 300 Sorith E3eiclrci- f�oad ; ` . :,' F, _ Clc:arwat�e,Fic�i•ida 337b5 �'°.'x -�;'�� : `' ,� ^-,u c.im4ry,. ....�.. . �, , � . r,.ech t't)nc.rrY_trsideei7gin��ri»�sPrvices.com � , � 727 943 2f3G9 i=ax 727 �#=#G f3036 , , � Civil Land I'lanning �Jue Diligence Reports Re-Zoning,l.and Use,Annexation ��°;;s�te.fC6�Pf��C�� :�t'�f��t:::' �,�v��. Stnrmwacer Management Utility(�esign EXHIBIT "B" Traffic Const.�°taction Administ�-atio�� TO FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION FOR COMPREHENSIVE INFILL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT 1421 Missouri Avenue Section B. Description of Request The Applicant, Savatore Belloise proposes to retain an existing commercial building, legally constructed in 1955 providing;3,24.5,��uare;�e�t of retail/ofiice area. The subject property is a 0.24 acre site bounded�by Missouri Avenue`on the west and commercial developments to the north and south. �. Specifically, the Applicant requests flexible development approval to retain the use of the site and building with: , � �,:.:,.a_Lot Area of 10,463 square feet; b. a Lot Width of 105'; ° ._ _,- c. an existing height of 11' to flat roof 11-18"to top of parapet; d. an existing front (west) setback along Missouri Avenue of 1.1' to existing building, 0' to the new proposed canopy and 1.2' to existing pavement; e. an existing rear (east) setback of 18.5' to existing building and 0' to existing pavement; f. an existing side (north) setback of 10.2' to existing building, 7.5' to the proposed canopy and 0' to existing pavement; g. an existing side (south) setback of 37' to existing building, 32' to the proposed canopy and 0' to existing pavement; h. providing for 12 on-site parking spaces; i. an impervious surface ratio of 0.91. ; - �, , � ��,,�,� �:� ,. . , ., ,, j. F.A.R. of 0.31 ;: , ` ,,, _. . as a Compreh�nsive Infill Redevelopment Project, und�r the provisions of Se�tion 2 7u4:C of the Code with reductions to the landscape requirements through a Comprehensive Landscape Application. 304 So�.rtl7 Bc�ich�r Raad � Cl�a�`wat;er,Flar•icia 33765 � ' � tech t�nortl�sideengineeringse�°vices.cai��9 r�� zs�� r�:��z.� �ab�r��r� Historv The existing structure was constructed in 1955 and contains 3,245 sq ft of commercial space and uniquely includes a non-habitable basement below. In March of 2011 Bay to Gulf Holdings, LLC purchased the site and it was determined that due to lack of occupancy while under the previous ownership the site was no longer approved for use without re-approval through this process as the existing development, although legally constructed in 1955, no longer meets current code requirements associated with setbacks for the existing structure, pavement and available area for landscaping. The current owner, Salvatore Belloise purchased the site in October of 2011 and is proceeding with the required process to occupy the existing development. Proposed Use It is intended that the existing structure and site will be used much the same as it always has been, with neighborhood commercial uses taking occupancy such as retail and office operations. Until this process is complete, new tenants can not be solicited and therefore ,r,: ,, , ; we can not offer the specific businesses proposing occupancy, the Developer has agreed to provide no more than 2,445�sq. ft. of retail to meet the parking needs and requirements for the existing development with the remaining area being utilized for an office use. , Any future proposed businesses will be required to obtain Certificates of Occupancies and meet the requirements associated with legal occupancy of the building. Depending upon the tenants taking the space the building may end up with a single tenant or multiple tenants, it is unc�erstoad that_an� interior tenant build outs will require permitting and approval. Again until this process is complets new tenants really-car�not be determined. Re-occupancy of the site will have a positive affect on the neighborhood and surrounding sites. Section D. Written Submittal Requirements General Applicabilitv Criteria: 1) The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. The bulk, coverage, density and scale of the surrounding commercial properties are very similar to the existing subject property as most were constructed in the same era and therefore are similar in site and building design. Many of the properties found to the south, west and north provide similar site and building designs, consisting of similar setbacks, building scale, bulk, coverage and density with parking similar to the subject site. Therefore, the proposed re-use of the existing building and site will be in h�rmc�n�% and:character with the adjacent ,, � . properties. 2 ;,`; 2) The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. Vacant buildings in an area generally have a�iegative impact on new development and re-development ancl can lower or impair property values. The proposed re- occupancy of the �uil�ing and site will help to encourage new development and re-developm�nt of adjacent land; in this difficult econorriic time, where vacancy rates are at the highest level in years, it is anticipated the proposed re-occupancy will have a positive effect on the surrounding properties and values. 3) The proposed developr��nt will not adversely ��'��C�t the health or safety of persons resitling or wor�i�g yn the neighborhood of the proposed use. Typically vacant sites do not promote safety; active, vibrant and utilized commercial properties reflect positively on the health and safety of residents and workers in the area. The proposed re-use of the existing site and building, together with proposed upgrades to the building and site will reflect positively on the community and persons residing or working in the neighborhood. 4) The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. This small scale commercial development will not create traffic congestion; this portion of the Missouri Avenue receives a lower rate of traffic and can easily handle the low number of trips generated by this small scale commercial development. 5) The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the �mmediate vicinit� of the parcel proposed for development. . . F;. ....,;, s .. The site and building �is clearly consistent with the charaeter of the community as. ma�y of'th� surroundin��ievelopments were designed and built in the same time � period and are very similar in design. The proposed upgrades will be consistent . with community character and will provide an improved update and fresh look to . the building and site. 6) The design of the prc�p�s�d de�s��o�s��r�� rninimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactorry� and hours of operation impacts on adjacent properties. 3 - The existing devel��ment �:�� roposed xe-use of the site ��ili not cause adverse effects on adjacent properties. Future�t�n��r:ts/.businesses taking occupation of the building will meet the use requirements" ot ihe district and code requirements associated with acoustic, olfactory and hours of operation. The basic action of occupancy will result in immediate minimalization of and improvement to, any adverse effects the vacant site currently may have on the adjacent properties. Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Proiect Criteria: l. The development or redevelopment is otherwise impractical without deviations from the use and/or development standards set forth in this zoning district. The proposed deviations from Code are necessary and minimal in order to make re-use of this existing site. Certain deviations are necessary in order to accommodate the existing building and site legally developed in 1955. Re-use of this site meets the City's vision of encouraging the adaptive re-use of underutilized buildings in the event redevelopment is not feasible. The building is structurally sound and is in character with the surrounding structures. The site design is similar to the designs found on�many o�the surrounding commercial developments. Additionally,,;�llowing�the re-occupation of this.existing building and site will provide positive'momentum in a very poor economic time�and in a district that is curr�r}tly struggling with vacant buildings and crime. , � . ' ' � _. , . '�,.1'IDi S <.... . , . ' ��,j'F ` . � . , Setbacks The relief sought from the setbacks are required and the minimum necessary to . accommodate use of the existing building, pavement and available areas for landscaping. The requesied setback reductions are primaxil}�•associated with the existing building and pavement an� not .a,eondition created by the owner. Improvements to landscape design, the 'build�ng elevations and function are proposed offering upgrades to current conditions where possible to achieve. Parkin� and Access The site has utilized the existing parking configuration since the original approval and construction in 1955 with a cross access document to allow this site and the southern site to share a driveway. Many of the developments in the vicinity, built in the same era provide similar parking situations. Employees/Staff/Owners will park in the rear area leaving the parking spaces along the entrance of the building open and available for customers. The proposal includes provisions to make the building handicap accessible, to add an accessible parking space where not currently present and to provide an accessible route to the public sidewalk. A Shared Parking Chart has been provided within the plan set and illustrates 12 Spaces being the highest number of required parking spaces with the 12 spaces being provided on site. � � ��,�, , � �4 . - � 2. The development or redevelopment will be consistent with the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan, as well as with the general purpose, intent and basic planning objectives of this Code, and with the intent and purpose of this zoning district. The subject site with the requested approval as a Comprehensive In-Fill Project is consistent with many of the goals and policies within the Comprehensive Plan associated with urban conservation and;"renewal. The re-use of this site meets the City's vision of encouraging the adaptive re-use of underutilized buildings in the event redevelopment is not feasible.Retail and/or Office uses are permissible uses within the "Commercial',',zo�ing district. The uses are als� permissible within the "Commercial General" land use category. 3. The development or rea��elQpment will not impede the,;,�or•mal and orderly development and impro��ment af ag��-ro�r��:ding pro�erties. The proposed project is compatible with the neighborhood, as is more particularly discussed in General Applicability Criteria 1 and 2 as well as Comprehensive Infill Criteria 4 below, and will not impede other development. The re-use of the site may encourage renovation or redevelopment of some of the other vacant sites in the vicinity. An occupied site with new businesses and tenants will certainly benefit the community as a whole and specifically this district. 4. Adjoining properties will not suffer substantial detriment as a result of the proposed development. The adjoining properties will not suffer detriment of any kind as a result of this proposal; actually the opposite is true, re-occupation of the property will improve the value of the adjoining properties as well as improving safety through the establishment of active businesses to help create a more vibrant and safe street presence. Illegal activity is threatened by legal activity; the proposed re-occupation of the site will help to deter crime, loitering and vandalism. The building and site wi�l be aitilized in.much the same manner as in the past 56 years and will not have � nega�ive impact the surrounding site. . 5. The prmposed use shall;atherwise be permitted by the u�nderlying future land use category, be compatible with adjacent land uses, will not substantially alter the essential use characteristics of the neighborhood; and shall demonstrate compliance with one or more of the following objectives: a. The proposed us�-as��ermitted in this zoning disfi�'�ct as a minimum standard, flexil��e �t��:��rd es•fl'��hle.��ve�opment use; 5 , ;! b. The proposed use would be a significant economic contributor to the City's economic base by diversifying the local economy or by creating jobs; c. The deveiop�ixbr_t proposal accommodates; thQ expansion or redevelopmea►� _r►f a� ��'sstx�b e�€��a.�mic ��niributor; d. The proposed use provides for the provision of affordable housing; e. The proposed use provides for development or redevelopment in an area that is characterized by other similar development and where a land use plan amendment and rezoning would result in a spot land use or zoning designation; or f. The proposed use provides for the development of a new, and/or preservation of a working waterfront use. Retail and Office uses are permitted by the "Commercial General" land use category and in the "Commercial" zoning district as a minimum standard, flexible standard and flexible use. Future tenants may create jobs within the community and will contribute to the local economy, the proposed Retail and/or Office use is compatible with the adjacent land uses of retail, service and office in an area characterized by other similar developments. � :iL�: � ._.i .�,. . .. � . � 6. Flexibility with regard to use, lot width, required setbacks, he�g:�t and off- street parking are justified based on demonstrated compliance with all of the fo�lowing desi�r� �bjectives: .w a. The proposed development will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of the surrounding properties for uses �ermitted in this zoning district. The proposed retail arr�,��r �3�fice t�ses �r� ��ri�itted in the Commercial zoning district. As previousl}�;�Ysc�:��v� i�? detail in General Applicability Criteria 1, the proposed re-occupation of the site will not impede the surrounding properties which are of similar size and use. The proposed project may stimulate additional business activity in this area and may encourage redevelopment of other sites. b. The proposed development complies with applicable design guidelines adopted by the City. No specific guidelines are in place for this area. 6 . , c. The design, scale and intensity of the proposed development supports the established or emerging character of an area; The majority of the surrounding sites were developed in the same era and therefore the design, scale and intensity of the existing subject site supports the established chai•acter of the area. Please see Comp. Infill Criteria 4 for discu�sion of compatibility with the neighborhood. d. In order to form a cohesive, visually interesting and attractive appearance, the proposed development incorporates a substantial number of the following design e��ments: • Changes in horizon�al building planes; • Use of arctaitectural details such as columns, cornices, stringcourses, pilasters,porticos,balconies, railings,awnings,�etc; e �ariety iri mate�ials,colors and textures; • Distinctive fenestration patterns; • Building stepbacks; and • Distinctive roofs forms. ' The existing building-��.cohesive, attractive and sim�?�s'""t�o the surrounding developments. Th� arctliteccurui cies5�r. :s re��cfive af the period, offering clean lines and a distinctive building�appe��nce. -�'lie proposal includes the addition of a cohesive decorative awning along the west and south elevations of the building and includes extending the decorative awning to wrap around the northwest corner for continuity. The building, upon completion will provide a distinctive color pallet of rich brown, black and white and will be a striking contrast to the previous condition of the building. The proposal includes removal of a portion of the existing overhang along the south building elevation allowing the deletion of the unattractive support columns along the south elevation. The new proposed decorative awning will not require support columns; a decorative aluminum handrail is proposed along the walkway of the south elevation and will compliment the building design and style. e. The proposed development provides for appropriate buffers, �nhanced landscape design and appropriate distances between buildings. ' The existing buffers are appropriate and reflective of the surrounding sites and the character of the area. Enhanced landscaping is proposed in all available areas; a new landscape area is provided al�ng the east side of the building between the parking space`s and the `building, offering improvements to the existing developrilent. ' ` , *��*�**��********:�:� 11/14/20ll 10:01 AM ,. .�. . " "LL �lanning D��artment CASE NUMBER: ° C earwater 100 SOUth Rfly1'�le AVe�lu� � RECENED BY(Staff Initials): Clearwater, Fiorida 3375n' ' Telephone: 727-562-4567 DATE RECEIVED: � Fax: 727-562-4865 ❑ SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION ❑ SUBMIT 14 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION-Plans and application are required to be collated,stapled and folded into sets * NOTE: A TOTAL OF 15 SETS OF THIS APPLICATION AND ALL SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION IS REQUIRED TO BE SUBMITTED IN CONJUNCTION WITH A COMPLETE LEVEL ONE OR LEVEL TWO APPLICATION. COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM (Revised 03/29/2006) �PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT� APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A) aPP�icANT NaME: Salvatore Belloise MAILING ADDRESS: J'IR N81'CISSUS A`V@IlU@, Cl��ruvater B��ci�, FL 3�767 � ��____ ____ _ __ __--------------...----...____ ..-----_.._._------- -- --__._ – — PHONE NUMBER: 727-449-2700 _ __ CELL NUMBER: 727-70J-1272 PROPERTY OWNER(S): _ S81V1t01'@ B@IIOIS�: __.__.._..._....- ---._. _.__.._......._.._. __... _.__.._.__. _._ . _..._._. . .._._.__...- -----_.____.__ -- --- __..__—....._----__.. List ALL owners on the deed Northside Engineering Services, Inc. AGENT NAME: HOUSII GhOVa@@, CEO - Renee Ru��iero, Senior Prolect Planner _ __---.---- --.______...__.._ --- __ MAILING ADDRESS: 300 S. Belcher Road, Clearwater, FL 33765 - -.._.. ------_-__. .......---- -----..-------- -.._._._ _ ... --____. _.__... _ _....___ .. ---- .___ PHONE NUMBER: iC��3-�869 FAX NUMBER: 727-446-8036 E-MAIL CELL NUMBER: 727'235-8475 A��vs: Rer�e��northsideengineering.net �. REQUEST: Reduction to the perimeter West landscape buffer along Missouri Avenue from 10' to 0' (to Existing Bldg and pavement.), a reduction to the perimeter South, North and East landscape buffers from 5' to 0' (to Existing P'vmt); to allow no terminal islands and 2.5% vehicular green-space in lieu of the required 10% as a Comprehensive Landscape Program. 2. ARCHITECTURAL THEME: a. The landscaping in a Comprehensive Landscape Program shall be designed as a part of the architectural theme of the principal buildings proposed or developed on the parcel proposed for the development. The landscape design will compliment the clean line of the building; four new trees and over 100 new plantings will be provided within the north side yard and the rear east yard. The improvements will accent the new decorative canopy and not cover the architectural interest bein�created through this Re-development proposal. OR b. The design, character, location and/or materials of the landscape treatment proposed in the Comprehensive Landscape Program shall be demonstrably more attractive than landscaping otherwise permitted on the parcel proposed for development under the minimum landscape standards. Z:12011 AutoCAD Projecfs11113-Missouri AvenuelLetfers�GocslDoes Under Sa/s NamelComp. ianuscape App w Narrative.11.3.11.doc Page 1 of 2 3. LIGHTING: Any lighting proposed as a part of a Comprehensive Landscape Program is automaticaily controlled so that the lighting is turned off when the business is closed. Acknowledged, any proposed lighting w�ll be turned off wFier� 4�F�e business is closed. 4. COMMUNITY CHARACTER: The landscape treatment proposed in the Comprehensive Landscape Program will enhance the community character of the City of Clearwater. 100% of all available open space adjacent is proposed to be planted with Florida friendiy plantings; new plantings are proposed in all available open areas_ The proposed 9% open space exceeds the minimum 5% required open space and is increased slightly though this re-development/re-occupation proposal. 5. PROPERTY VALUES: The landscape treatment proposed in the Comprehensive Landscape Program will have a beneficial impact on the value of the property in the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. The proposed improvements will most likely have a positive impact on the value of the surrounding properties and the immediate vicinity. To insure sustainability of tihe investment, draught tolerant native plantings make up the majority of the design. Through sound landscape design,the improvements will continue to be enjoyed for many years to come. � 6. SPECIAL AREA OR SCENIC CORRIDOR PLAN: The landscape treatment proposed in the Comprehensive Landscape Program is consistent with any special area or scenic corridor plan which the City of Clearwater has prepared and adopted for the area in which the parcel proposed for development is located. N/A � �� THE LANDSCAPING REQUIREMENTS OF ARTICLE 3, DIVISION 12 MAY BE WAIVED OR MODIFIED AS A PART OF A LEVEL ONE OR LEVEL TWO APPLICATION, AS THE GASE MAY BE, IF THE APPLICATION FOR DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL INCLUDES A COMPREHENSNE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM, WHICH SATISFIES THE---�BOVE CRITER�A. THE USE OF LANDSCAPE PI�,NS, SECTIONS / ELEVATIONS, RENDERINGS AND PERSPECTNES MAY BE NECESSARY 7�'SUFPLEMENT THE INFORMATION P..ROVIDED ON THIS WORKSHEET. SIGNATURE: I,the u er ned,acknowledge that all representations made in STATE OF FLORIDA,COUNTY OF PINELLAS this a li ion are true and accurate to the best of my Sworn to and su scribed before me this�day of know d and authorize City representatives to visit and ,A.D.20 to me and/or by pho gr ph the property described in this application. who is personally known has produce . �. as identification. -'�� ,�'L..�. �. ' ature of property owner or representative Notary public, � � My commission expires: (H 3j �3� �ptPR*pUglr . �r + � c* MY COMM�ISS ON#p gqgg�j EXPIRES:May 3,2014 N��rFOF FL��\�P Bonded Thru Budget NoGuy$�g Z:12011 AutoCAD Projects11113-Missouri AvenuelLetters&DocslDocs Under Sa/s NamelComp. landscape App w Narrative.11.3.11.doc Page 2 of 2 ,�� f .. � tC ff 8�� ;,� _ ,,....=i '_ _'___ ,` )fF� d - .ILOCA 4 tlG7E � �i y �LL NECH�NIGL EWIPNDIT SHALL BE$CREENm�5 PER SECTON �x� S + � + �;i 7 . J-RO1.D OG THE IAND OEVELOP4ENT RFGIIUTq15 � S q Y ,. . � � s�oex uioxc � N � �� - � 1�1�_.\ .lyl\N��..1VLli.�]U�li\ 1.::.� -.1 l.»�1..1.1 .��1:� � ..1�'�.1�.»l l� �1.�` �� 1.>\:.a.�\\\.u.]]»1`..11�..il.\.> >1.il� .1��5 1 lvll_ 1 � p � � ��0�E! t II�= �I II_ I . 'R`'.: � ��0'48 E� � �.99' p 4.99 10 � w ��'� +� �� i _____ .,. . � ;i ........ . � � = � RL 3 \ ., " � lu .. i I I� � -.. � L J .._ _ � —EWRm_ .._ � �� - �v� � �� x . �� _, _ �� - �� Art RER P I .'...- Pv � --1 � '. n. ^ ':r ..... I 5 P�RNINO�SP�CES � I . � I �,,,_ —_ MHEEL STfIP � : .-.y, . k --... �� '..�: I I 1 � ,--+,e� "•-'P � - .. 1105F� . �� , �„ , 6 , , , , ; ` r � � �� ., r ,r �.��r�� 4 I �' �,w�. �� g�,��, � :�, � f� . :- f � `- �� I� 3 j. 4 f` 1 ��; I � . �^� I . � �� i' t., i i . .r;t�� ,_K � �f � .. } , y... .-,s v. .._._ � +� '_ . _� . `.'4.,°. . i , F > � �� a. .� _:� � „ i � _r... �.... - � gp � iti I G$3 "� I�0 �`� � �� E n� -n�uove exrsn a `-'f� � ,' f I� : 5{ � �� siear5iosene�� °' � � DS��PF AS �//�� PER LANpSCAPE �' ''" � / I I I 5 � � oV � I .� f 4 � n (BLACx BMRELS) C C f$. �'N'H i .' I ° � � � C011C ` � ; � � ` i �� _, �3 ;- c 50EWA11(� I� ° 3� . ' • .a , EX. 1-STORY '�:. '��1�-�-- --� � . � - '£;.. 1-„70RY �` �➢ � ' s� � _" BUILD/NG `"'� � "' � �SW I� BULDING' ' ��: F ``�ti .. 4- MF '� FL EL = )0.5 _� �Y' �� '°"�`, .i .M'.. =� !" FL. EC. = 70.5 � ,.. . ....._ �•�. ?= �� r-w � -=" �m EX 7-S70RY ' < <-.K - q ez.cau �EX 7 STORY § - y. � - �t` f � RECON_IRLCT�CCE4 I� ��, y� � � '. '.. W "� BUILD/NG "� '�' aEOUwE u �'�o BUILDING ° I� ; � �' '- ? k � FL. EL = 10.0 4 �- '�-1 , FL EL. - 70 0 E� � 3 � E ``+ � }. ? � �., �<z,-�� .*>� ASSUMEO �- : � ? � ._ ,,._.,.... ASSUMED � �� _ ��3 . b ...,,.-_ -, ., . i .., , ., " A -> ...._�.�_.t B � � *� '� I � . _ 1�2'IPMAN SLWE W .^. �i3Oe � '•f.,�j.I .�: �y�� ;N i�"'4 15'I9UYETCRAOE�~ � ? � �.•' � HC SICN A I �.., �s:. � � A � ,_, ; .�� . � : -� a ._ e .. �,��,�e� a ;,,,� ��..,� :,` ,:�.�..i: �.+.-^.y' r.:��. `< ,�'.�"' ��_� 8 �8 '� ;,,;� emc mc[ "�: - �:L_� '�"'�i.:, ,'`,�`..:, co ceo.ecnwc r'g "' '`J^. t I s I I oKRnnN � �� m Bi acuovm) � �` "f�� ew uaxa s'u�uHpuy � sAi: .� .t Iy. CCJQtED CpNCREIE I I (TO REYMN) I I � ` � tT ,w3 *:� i i i i i 3 8 i i 3 i '" �-_ H _. 1P wui t ee oxu� .-�I-.2 � . i � i i i i i i i - ...., �' '�✓ �« ' * ;—T11 i i i i i i i ; _.__ � _ rn�cFi.aa� O �� I � �. ..._ .____ L� -- I y�y I LJ I I �B P�RKINGIqA�S I pj,�OVE�.a15lING � IXp� X�T F.� �� / � � �� '} I I i I I I CdlCRE"E WAIK/R/�,IP �T . � �RKMG I �'" � �I I I I I I ND C=T NS � I 4 � ! 3 L_ -� ■ � Pn'�eli /779 s�: \ `LL � �.,,�. . ..i.z � y � ... � ' �. � , e 1 � 3�16'SIGX .« � ,•^` � J ` ::.r:z T .s�..- +.^" �€ _ j'�i� -�� ,.<. ,�. a..isiau�: ; p OW29H7 ' I � ' � . . � _ _ �_ wo. . 1 W � ' Y< <. fi..A f ~'E uNOEP ��. -. g ,1.Jr.� r LANDSC�PEBVa X REWIRE➢ • �'�, _ �. , ._ _ � �. _ , � _ , �_ _ _ ��,____� .�.. � a°^ -, � , . N 8970'18'W 104.98' -�--�-� � v�:.. ._., ..�'yilae'.�y •.��.... � � F` i 3� a. :' •.� � � NB9'1048 W if04.89' — x' . . i . .. r:_ M„r.. .N „ A �c �r. � � c , � � � .. s„v x ��, ,._ .. n, t p�wc� r� � , _ _.,F. �..— � av� , _ � =, "*- "l '",- ^� -`. .n � o� : �,.. �: � . c �.: < , . ;.. ___ . _ ,.� ... .. '.d", . , ., .,. lf`� �$: . �,,. '.. `�-`, � ( '�-; i _ � 'j i �_. . � �� H _, • "�° y „r. : i � �. ° � ' --� . .. :.s- ; a _ �` . n :� ... ,... � - - � �� O .._._ _._ _____ __...._ � - -. . .._ ..._ -_ __. ._ J I ! , � .. ',, , -- ....� �� J . �__. ..__ . ._.__ ------._ .......... . . ___ ._ __..... ...... .. .._.__ .___ ._ ...____- .__.__. W �. �.: . �� °�U y �-r . �...��_.�_.... � M � ..^. �`;'- ,v t �� `a ✓e' ._ „.. o o W .v+ ' - Ex. e�oc. � �� r , Ex. a�oc. �,4L��G�� t?�:�nsC^�DOC��C�� Q d ��M DC�Mnti 0O dO��J� p�f� a a uz.� d a r�., g� Q �t.� DEMOL/T/ON NOTES �� LINE TABLE �� °F o E%5TN0 NON-fANfORYINC RE6T�NDING y r� ��L � LABEL BEARINC LENGTH ��' � �C � SICM SXIiLL BC REYOYED ANU BROUGXT IMO . � r �£IX. CONiDRMT'�UR514MI TO CDC fi ioa.c.s wr L-1 N 00'19'29�W(M) 21.20'(M) d` "�'"� ,.. � [W]R2 MIR �� ND 6-1 W:�NY NEW PIIOPoSED SIGMI�OE °N"� L 2 �� O "� Sx�LL BE Mq1EssEO TxvouGM• ��" \ C °� .-, - N B9'40'31�E M 5.00� M) (n Uj O ��f�' � COYPREXENSNE SIGM PROCPFY x� \ � .. _ ", L-3 S 89'40'37"W M 5.00'(M) �� H W N O��Q.��. ,y�,� a SEP�RITE 1PPLIGTION�NO SIIBYISSIDN. �, N� (� ..;.::...... � qq/�,� L-4 N 00'19'29�W M 229'(M [1 @ � e'U W �^°�°� '"��r NORTH � NOTE. dd ��OT� o� y��` IX.W�TER!SEWER SEMING CURRENT jj Q q�pK q�.,�p��t giq ��s��.Mpp� SITE TO RE WIN AS-I5.�DU�C.O.ON I Y µ° ��r a�� s�w�rvwn cwrxcrm w ri un m SEwER uNE If woT IXISTINC. LM,.�� ;,�I TREE LEGEND SCALE: 1"=1 D' NO�IIB 0 y` ° caan�nov�o[cers�srui�'ttvr N�w�ic .. - ,� ayr�s..�..L. �,ur a.ow.� � �r.�..+�m�,r�c...�w °�,a,"HS��.,�.w�a� SECTION A-A ..,.,: ,,. = aa�re rnEe ��(�\/`''/��//�)\J J4I�II s I.4�O�f IX.I/FFS IIINwS MIMIi' �p��M.S1PY nQ MIFR LKS l�ll Md4 `/LJ 0 LI r.. ��..o.o.u�mu�c.c�cas c HANDRAIL DETAIL xo o io sa �o x ,� � � NEW 4' CONC. � � r � � SIDEWALK p�I `�::�t .I �----� \ � I I. ., � ��»��'�L�ti\�\.�� ,��.��L:A��i��t�5 �„ 1 -� ' 3 S 89 10 48" E,� 4.99� � .. h` r� , .�--�� .� �, � , �,�. X ,,.., � E5.00' � � '� � � � ""'� �� a� �� 5j` �B�FER REQUIRED � __ L-3 I - ,� ' �q...� � � ' / J ;1 r-�� WHEEL STOP � �w �.� -- 4i,;` � j� � z i�.� .� m �.: / R / � .:I- I 36 P OJECTING O � (u �¢ _..; i CANOPY �; �� QT J � , � `a �'`' ��I' � I � � ' BI,DCli A / i �r''�+�� I v ' t ^^: vc. ,�:ANu �n.�, h'ES C�5' ` � . B+ ��i � —�—_ � '1 y,C ,� I `'�p,:, � m --F AS%�4_ �.�.��.�'s' o I �; n�'. �e � �:,� .�} ...'I; A MIN �M y' c � { �I _ •� AWtvING f :•� .. � �� ,� :�� cVE�HAhG / � .; '---'I NEW 5'x5' TRASH `�� cn o� c � ��,Q p i STAGING AREA �.•--'�- � 18 24 r � -: � I �.&-� � . w� I � � (BLACK BARRELS) �� NEW 4� CONC. Z � p $-? �.� � ��":� a� '� • SIDEWALK o � ( � �o % l�. v, X c. - � Y ��'�� _� z� � Ex. �-sroRY Y�� { ,� --� '' z _ �� , 3 ��yl ;_ �� '�� V�LQ�N�i ��cr ... -�g � � Y ' 7 � m �t:- � :a �m FL EL. = 10.5 '' �z = � ;:. Ex. co�uMN- EX. 1—STORY Z m a s � I i�a � � ,• • � R�CONS7RUCT ACCES$ u � {� � z �' TO BLDG TO MEET ADA BUILDING � � � w "�^ ci I `�`' � ;�� -� � F:EQUIREMENTS _ � p �`�� „�� ,~C'�, ,`; � Z �. � � FL. EL. — 10.0 � :m 2 ''� ° {( N F��.z�N s .;�� n�,��,�� _ �_ ._ � ASSUMED - � m � �� `v I� '�' �.:��:I. '� e t4 � r [j, ^ � ° C/; o �.♦ � ''-° � ��':.• � � RAMP UP � � �� r;a' 12:1 MAX SLOPE ( �-��,� I r.z { �. � �;-ia�C �t �OhC,-.S .. Q W �:� �2.3'3' 2'.1' 6' 102' 4.1' 9.4' 6' 16' �v ^� MAX HEIGHT '� � �� . � C, � !�' HC SIGN � 15" ABOVE GR b � � � H N O , h� I� � � 0 P: JE�TMG i: .w�' 'Ufl' - DETECTABLE x � '�+� C�NDPY .;t�/ �,2:. �� :'lr., ,.'./:� . �.�� WARNING .. p +: � BLDG. EDGE �.= "' -`'` ' " � ' — 60' PROJEC NG I � � c n: : ;.=.._ - � -�-��x - - r i b � .: -_} —� o 0 o CANOPY � (n � � . 3 'A�AL S�X5� LANDING � R 1 ��„�� NEW E AINING �,,, a N' r,� 1 1�' _ �� WALL & HANDRAIL 12' � � � � �- __ _- � � HC m ,,,,_,_� 5�..:;_• �a�� ` i: WHEE� STOP � 0 o i O EX. ,� HALT' �� a Q � -�: PF�RKING � h 3= E, ,'� Z 3 I � _ `� ' i i � ` �; J � o�°o ' �LI I 9 � _ � ✓ja� - �oo � "' �� 20'x20' SIGHT �t+; TYP. �" �" �'/!��`� � �� VISIBILITY `rQ ' EX. A F�-P.LT PA� H�NT ��y ��" � TRIANGLE �z ; �: � ,;�Q . ��_- LOfi 4 - ..._�_�-- __ � � do3� PROP. �� o° �LOCK A � _ � LINE . < � ` � 5 LANDSCAPE BUF R REQUIRED � '" � � � � ,i�� 3 �, � N 89 10'48 W � 104.99' � a „ 3 � j � Q O1 1 '� y�-' " �9i'v LN"c ":; v ��_'.- EDGE OF �. (�h ° ' � , � . �� =�� PARKING Y ,. . � ( ��' c: o .. �%_ r "E!v','�? n'--�... '� c ? � ` vi ti_ � � �, l � I �y / Q I � b = �.O� �� F ' � �� j . �T i � " V? S c � � ( � �� M I '�'. =I 1 7 � '� I .� �i �i � � � .. � I �_ .. L), . � '.. r�..� .4\ , , _,,, . ~ . . .._ ._.. .,_ ��...-_ � -� .. .__ � _. . ' ... .�. �._ .._.._ ._ �'- - ,,,. .., ..... ,.. : .__ ..._. __ .___" _.. _ _.._.. _ f_.__ ... .._.._. ,��. �s$�M-��„a�„ � � �es�' 4 [�� , bixk doth amrq . . . ��'� 3�-0• .�. ... . . .. . .. ..... .. .5-0'. . . ..:,... ...., ,. ... .�..., ..... . . . .. . : .� � . .. .. � . . � � . . � . F:. -3 tY1 � 0'5. �� .._ . .� g�� ..... ..; . 14'-10" y�.:L� � . .. 17.812' . . . . . . . . .. .. � • �� M, � � . .. . �ci.c F. X M I . . .. . .. � . . . . � � � . � `�b� m A S e ram ''– --1ev I��r�w �------ � . , . . a�lt�rve �� 50UTN��VA110N .v, �;., � �� _ �� H ,�. _ _ _:..,. . . _ .. . � . . . .. ...,.. _ 8'-9112' S.,Q. � rFp . � � '°'°�6�tU�. . / � 2 c lYtlt � N. . - � �. � � 8'-10' - fh�h . � �, e,-0' r. ,� o, .� ai� � fn�sl,ed flcer level , , b�M ------------------------------------ ------------------------- p q� — --- --- �,: - - � O� ;; � �'C. W�51"�I.�VA110N w ��w ^�y�r . . . . . . . .. . qR1as 8 km-"whda" 'p O+� ,y �T��, . . . . . . T 7 ' � ry�� Q � � W F+�� . � � . . . . - . � , . . . � a'-1' bla�k dcd,amM ;��N N � panb5W b},yl�q � . � . � ...,, . . . . � . . ��„ �. .1-.---�10-�0'_-- � C/��U o��F„oFrush . a�cunit .. .. . vs�soF'bti� ... � � . . . � . . �. �, , f1�eh � .. � . . : .. ... .. . . . �. �� tz�8 fYY . a � ~c�w � � . � . . . . f �� tn� ----------------------------f�Lshedflarlevel_;_ e', �";�� – -------- -------------- Q _ ----------------- � _ --------------------- ' � �gw Zi=F� NO�TN��VA110N _ a,Hers&Wn.��xfiRe" 9�s 8 km-��v,fiihe�� d�, r� i -- b,-0, ^�tal�v^. a/c unit � �n!!, a/c unit r•��: �� ._6,4' .,._.. 6'-11• �� . $-0'. . . � . - � .� _ .. . 3'-0' .. � / . YIO P.XIt � 5�� / � � c�r � �µ � � � � � �� e Y�aYiA�e� � .. � �� . .'Pa�af'61QI � � �. � .. -.._.. � ,. .: . . jy�.i , .::: -----.: �--------r ,��,�t--- �. � . . .. -- - �� ......,.,•.�,._,,., . . --�_ �A51"��VA110N p�OpOS�n��VA110N 1 B SCW.E: I/9"-I f00(