FLD2011-09030; 2800 GULF TO BAY BLVD; HOOTERS �
2800 GULF TO BAY BLVD
Date Received: 9/1/2011 1 :09:53 PM
Hooters
ZONING DISTRICT: Commercial
LAND USE: Commercial General
ATLAS PAGE: 291B
PLANNER OF RECORD:
PLANNER: Kevin Nurnberger, Planner III
CDB Meeting Date: November 15, 2011
Case Number: FLD2011-09030
Agenda Item: D. 7.
Owner: Limited Properties, Inc.
Applicant: Hooters Mana�ement Corporation
Agent: Northside En ineerin� Services. Inc.
Address: 2800 Gulf to Bay Boulevard
CITY OF CLEARWATER
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
STAFF REPORT
GENERAL INFORMATION:
REQUEST: Flexible Development application to permit a 2,138 square foot
addition to an existing 4,996 square foot restaurant in the Commercial
(C) District and Office (0) District with a lot area of 84,141 square feet
(1.93 acres), a lot width of 185.01 feet (along Gulf to Bay Boulevard)
and 255 feet (along Hampton Road), front (south) setbacks of 15 feet
(to proposed pavement) and 1.2 feet (to building), front (west) setbacks
of 3.9 feet (to proposed pavement) and 1.1 foot (to building), side (east)
setbacks of 3.3 feet (to pavement) and 114.3 feet (to proposed
addition), side (north) setbacks of 5.1 feet (to pavement) and 157.8 feet
(to proposed addition), side (north) setback of zero feet (to pavement),
and a side (west) setback of zero feet (to pavement), a building height
of 15.8 feet (to top of parapet wall) and 21.3 feet (to mid-point of
pitched roo�, and 107 off-street parking spaces, as a Comprehensive
Infill Redevelopment Project under the provisions of the Community
Development Code sections 2-704.C. and 2-1004.B., as well as
reduction to the front (south) perimeter buffer from 15 feet to 1.2 feet
(along Gulf to Bay Boulevard), a reduction to the front (west)perimeter
buffer from 10 feet to 1.1 feet (along Hampton Road), a reduction to
the side (east)perimeter buffer from 5 feet to 3.3 feet, a reduction to the
side (north) perimeter buffer from 5 feet to zero feet, and a reduction of
side (west) perimeter buffer of 5 feet to zero feet, and a reduction to the
parking lot interior island standard for existing interior islands from 8
feet greenspace (from back of curb to back of curb) and 150 square feet
to 7.8 feet greenspace (from back of curb to back of curb) and 143
square feet and 7.9 feet greenspace (from back of curb to back of curb)
and 147 square feet as a Comprehensive Landscape Program under the
provisions of the Community Development Code Section 3-1202.G.
ZONING DISTRICT: Commercial (C), and Office (0) Districts
FUTURE LAND USE Commercial General (CG), and
PLAN CATEGORY: Residential/Office Limited (R/OL)
PROPERTY USE: Cunent: Restaurant
Proposed: Restaurant
Community Development Board—November 15,2011
FLD2011-09030—Page 1
EXISTING North: Office (0)District
SURROUNDING Offices
ZONING AND USES: South: Commercial (C) District
Restaurant
East: C and Low Medium Density Residential (LMDR) Districts
Restaurant and Detached Dwellings
West: C and LMDR Districts
Retail Sales and Service and Retention Pond
ANALYSIS:
Site Location and Existing Conditions:
The 1.93 acre property is located on the northeast corner of Hampton Road and Gulf to Bay
Boulevard. It's the location of the original Hooters restaurant. This property has two zoning
classifications. The southern portion of the property (1.24 acres) is zoned Commercial (C)
District and consists of the existing 4,996 square foot restaurant and 66 parking spaces. The
northern portion of the property (0.69 acres) is zoned Office (0) District and consists of a reserve
parking area with 45 parking spaces. The property has 185 feet of frontage on Gulf to Bay
Boulevard and 255 feet along Hampton Road. The property can be directly accessed from both
Gulf to Bay Boulevard and Hampton Road; however, it may also be accessed from the adjoining
property to the north as well as by the property to the east off David Avenue.
To the south, located directly across Gulf to Bay Boulevard is a shopping center that consists of
various retails sales and services and restaurants. The adjacent property to the east consists of a
Pete and Shorty's restaurant. To the north, is the Hooters Corporate office building. Located to
the west, across Hampton Road, is another shopping center that consists of various restaurants,
and retail sales and service uses.
Development Proposal:
This development proposal is a request to allow for the expansion of an existing restaurant. The
primary purpose of the request is to add 2,138 square feet of indoor floor area for a new
dininglbar room area that will allow for the enlargement of the restaurants back of house
facilities such as the kitchen, restrooms, preparation and wait staff area. The expansion of the
building will allow for some emphasized enhancements to the building's east and south facing
fa�ade such as a covered portico, a parapet wall, 687 square feet of covered outdoor seating area,
and an additional hip roof tower situated on top of the new addition which is in keeping with the
existing character of the building.
Other features include large dining room windows and bahamas shutters on some existing
second story windows, all facing Gulf to Bay Boulevard. As mentioned, the character of
building far�ade will look mostly as it does today. Minor changes to the current color scheme
include adding a light gray colored new standing seam metal roof with the building itself
remaining a grey (Behr paints Sparrow) with dark grey (Behr paints Anonymous) trim.
Regarding the buildings setbacks, the new addition will be setback 3.6 feet along Gulf to Bay
Boulevard and 9.5 feet along Hampton Road which is more than existing conditions.
Community Development Board—November 15,2011
FLD201 1-09030—Page 2
Regarding the site, portions of the parking area shall be modified to allow for the building
addition by eliminating parking stalls and drive aisles to create space for a new dumpster
enclosure, loading space, outdoor seating and waiting areas. Other alterations to the site include,
reducing the size of the existing retention pond to allow for new parking spaces and adding a
new right in/right out driveway on Gulf to Bay Boulevard which will improve ingress and egress
as well as improve traffic movement on the property. A front setback to pavement along Gulf to
Bay Boulevard will be improved from 123 feet to 15 feet.
The proposal's compliance with the applicable development standards of the Community
Development Code (CDC)is discussed below.
Floor Area Ratio (FAR� Pursuant to the Countywide Plan Rules, the maximum allowable FAR
for the Commercial General (CG) Future Land Use Plan Categary is 0.55 as set forth in CDC
Section 2-701.1. The existing development along with the proposed addition will result in a
FAR of 0.13.
Impervious Surface Ratio (ISR� Pursuant to the Countywide Plan Rules and CDC Section 2-
701.1, the m�imum allowable ISR for the CG Future Land Use Plan Category is 0.90. The
proposed ISR for this property is 0.70. Pursuant to the Countywide Plan Rules and CDC
Section 2-1001.1, the maximum allowable ISR for the Residential/Office Limited (R/OL) Future
Land Use Plan Category is 0.75. The proposed ISR for this property is 0.50. The ISR for each
property is less than what may be permitted based upon the above code provisions.
Minimum Lot Area and Width: Pursuant to CDC Tables 2-704 and 2-1004, there is no minimum
required lot area or lot width for a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project. However, for a
point of comparison, CDC Table 2-702 requires a minimum lot area of 10,000 square feet and a
lot width of 100 feet for restaurants. The subject property has a lot area of 84,141 square feet
(1.93 acres). The width of the subject property is 185.01 square feet along Gulf to Bay
Boulevard and 255 square feet along Hampton Road. The proposal is consistent with these
criteria.
Minimum Setbacks: Pursuant to CDC Tables 2-704 and 2-1004, there are no minimum setback
requirements for a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project. However, for a point of
comparison, the minimum front setback requirement for restaurants can range between 15 and 25
feet, while side yards shall be at 10 feet. The existing front setbacks are 1.1 feet and 1.2 feet to
building. Front setbacks to the new addition will be 10.1 feet and 3.6 feet. None of the
structural setbacks exacerbate existing conditions. Each setback primarily continues in line with
or is slightly greater than the existing building footprint. The requested setbacks to structures are
acceptable to Staff.
In regards to setbacks to pavement, the front setback will be 15 feet to allow for a front
landscape perimeter buffer. The remaining setbacks to pavement are existing conditions and if
modified would result in the reduction to drive aisles widths and required number of parking
spaces. The requested setbacks to pavement are acceptable to Staff.
Community Development Board—November I 5,2011
FLD2011-09030—Page 3
In addition to the above, the site plan shows that a wood deck is located within the side (east)
setback below the billboard sign. An on-site inspection found that this accessory structure does
not serve the Hooters restaurant; rather it is used by the restaurant on the adjacent property as a
band stand. Although the applicants own the adjacent property as well, the accessory structure
does not meet most standards set forth in CDC Section 3-2�1.B. Specifically, that the accessory
structure is not located on the same property as the principal use, nor does it contribute to the
comfort, convenience or use of the principal use on the property it is located on; therefore, it is
attached as a condition of approval that the deck must be removed prior to the issuance of a
Certificate of Completion.
Maximum Buildin� Height: Pursuant to CDC Tables 2-704 and 2-1004, there is no maximum
allowable height for a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project. However, for a point of
comparison, the m�imum building height for restaurants in the C District can range between 25
and 50 feet. The proposed height of the building addition is 15.4 feet (to top of parapet wall).
The existing height of the restaurant is 2I.3 feet (to mid-point of pitched roo fl. The building
height is less than the Code provisions would allow for.
Minimum Off-Street Parkin�: Pursuant to CDC Tables 2-704 and 2-1004, the minimum required
parking for a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project is determined by the Community
Development Coordinator based on the specific use and/ar ITE Manual standards. The standard
off-street parking requirement for a restaurant use is 15 spaces per 1,000 square feet of gross
floor area. The proposed addition would increase the parking requirement to 106 off-street
parking spaces. The site plan shows that 107 parking spaces will be provided on site which
meets the standard set forth in CDC Section 3-1402. Furthermore, in regards to the outdoor
seating areas, restaurants may establish on-site outdoor cafes as an accessory use and such uses
shall be exempt from parking requirements as set forth in CDC Section 3-201.C.
Landscaping_ Pursuant to CDC Section 3-1202.D.1, this site is required a fifteen-foot wide
landscape buffer along both Hampton Road and Gulf to Bay Boulevard. Ten-foot wide
landscape buffers are required within each side yard. The application includes a request for a
reduction to the front (south) perimeter buffer from 15 feet to 1.2 feet (along Gulf to Bay
Boulevard), a reduction to the front (west) perimeter buffer from 10 feet to 1.1 feet (along
Hampton Road), a reduction to the side (east)perimeter buffer from 5 feet to 3.3 feet, a reduction
to the side (north) perimeter buffer from 5 feet to zero, and a reduction of side (west) setback of
5 feet to zero feet.
Where the applicant will be completing work directly related to this redevelopment is mostly
along Gulf to Bay Boulevard. The reduction in the front landscape perimeter buffer from 15 feet
to 1.2 feet is the only perimeter buffer area affected by the modifications to the site. All other
buffers are existing and cannot be increased without loss of parking spaces or a reduction to
drive aisles.
In regards to the reduction request for the front landscape perimeter buffer from 15 feet to 1.2
feet front, the applicant will provide a 15 foot wide landscape buffer for 37 percent (63 feet) of
the properties width along Gulf to Bay Boulevard. This reduced buffer area will be planted with
5 accent trees (glossy privet) and shrubs (compact simpson's stopper) with a mix of two
Community Development Board—November 15,2011
FLD201 1-09030—Page 4
groundcovers (super green giant lily turf and parsoni juniper). As to the remaining perimeter
buffers, the landscape plan shows that most existing trees will remain, while shrubs and
groundcover will added where possible to fill in the buffers. The result will be a continuous
hedge with two types of shrubs (schefflera and compact simpson's stopper) along the side
property lines and planting various types of groundcovers within the buffers. Also, creeping figs
will be planted around the fence within the buffer along the west side of the building which
should eventually cover and soften the fence with plant material. Such actions will improve the
perimeter landscaping. The landscape materials planted within the buffers especially those in
both front perimeter buffers and along the foundation of the building should provide a softened
edge between the building and the sidewalk as well as provide an attractive vegetative buffer that
enhances the visual appearance from the roadways. As proposed, this landscape plan goes
beyond standard perimeter buffer provisions and complies with the intent of the Comprehensive
Landscape Program. In addition, all the proposed landscape materials will be Florida Grade #l.
The requested reductions to the landscape perimeter buffers are acceptable to Staff.
In regards to interior landscaping, a reduction to two existing interior islands located in the
northern portion of the reserve parking lot has been requested to allow interior islands with 7.8
feet of greenspace (from back of curb to back of curb) and 143 square feet of interior island and
7.9 feet of greenspace (from back of curb to back of curb) and 147 square feet of interior island
to remain. CDC Section 3-1202.E requires interior islands to be 8 feet of greenspace (from back
of curb to back of curb) and 150 square feet. Staff believes the islands are acceptable as is since
the landscaping for this parking area was approved as a part of the development to construct the
Hooters Corporate Building in 2003 (BCP2003-03288B). However, the applicant shall restore
and/or replace any unhealthy or dead landscaping found within that parking area as shown on the
approved landscape plan. The approved landscape plan is compliant with current landscape
standards. The remainder of the interior landscaping shown on the landscape plan meets the
provisions set forth in CDC Section 3-1202.E.
In regards to the overall landscaping plan, the applicant proposes to incorporate a Florida
friendly Mediterranean theme to enhance the building improvements by offering a variety of
contrasting plant textures, shapes and colors. Plans indicate that there will be sprawling dark
green groundcovers planted in front of a light green upright yellow flowering shrubs as well as
upright variegated yellow and green dense foliage shrubs planted behind dark green delicate
ferns. Fountain like palms and crape myrtles will add height and depth to the design. Landscape
material planted to achieve this theme will mostly be planted along the buildings east fa�ade and
around the retention pond. Plants to be included are lavender crape myrtles, pigmy date palms,
pond cypresses, firecracker plants, wild date palms, and silver saw palmettos. Over 2,000
landscape materials will be planted on site, and to ensure sustainability, the majority of plants
will be drought tolerate native plantings. Staff believes the overall landscape plan exceed
minimum code requirements to off-set where code requirements will not be met.
Comprehensive Landscape Program: Pursuant to Section 3-1202.G of the Community
Development Code, the landscaping requirements contained within the Code can be waived or
modified if the application contains a Comprehensive Landscape Program satisfying certain
Community Development Board—November 15,2011
FLD201 1-09030—Page 5
criteria. The following table depicts the consistency of the development proposai with those
criteria:
Consistent Inconsistent
l. Architectural theme:
a. The landscaping in a comprehensive landscape program shall be designed as a X
part of the architectural theme of the principle buildings proposed or developed on
the parcel proposed for development;or
b. The design, character, location and/or materials of the landscape treatment X
proposed in the comprehensive landscape program shall be demonstrabty more
attractive than landscaping otherwise permitted on the parcel proposed far
development under the minimum landscape standards.
2. Lighting.• Any lighting proposed as a part of a comprehensive landscape program is X
automatically controlled so that the lighting is tumed off when the business is closed.
3. Communiry character: The landscape treatment proposed in the comprehensive X
landscape program will enhance the community character of the City of Clearwater.
4. Property values: The landscape treatment proposed in the comprehensive landscape X
program will have a beneficial impact on the value of property in the immediate
vicinity of the parcel proposed for development.
5. Special area or scenic corridor plan: The ]andscape treatment proposed in the N/A N/A
comprehensive landscape program is consistent with any special area or scenic
conidor plan which the City of Clearwater has prepared and adopted for the area in
which the parcel proposed for development is located.
Solid Waste: The location of the new enclosed dumpster on the northwest side of the building
addition has been found to be acceptable by the City's Solid Waste Department. It is a condition
of approval that the new dumpster enclosure shall be made of a masonry wall of similar material,
architectural details and colors as the proposed addition;
Si�?ht Visibility Triangles: Pursuant to CDC Section 3-904.A, to minimize hazards at the
driveways, no structures ar landscaping may be installed which will obstruct views at a level
between 30 inches above grade and eight feet above grade within 20-foot sight visibility
triangles. As shown on site plan, a portion of the outdoor seating area is located within the sight
triangle. The applicants plan to use a non-opaque fence material as the railing that encloses this
seating area. Traffic Engineering has reviewed the proposal and has determined the
encroachment not to be a safety issue. The conversion of the existing entrance from Gulf to Bay
Boulevard into a right turn in/right turn out only access way eliminates the ability for vehicles to
cross Gulf to Bay Boulevard to gain entry into the east bound traffic lanes. For this reason, the
structure encroachment was determined to not be a hazard within the sight triangle.
Si ng a�e: There is no sign request a part of this application.
Code Enforcement Analysis: There are no active Code Enforcement cases for the subject
property.
Community Development Board—November 15,2011
FLD201 1-09030—Page 6
COMPLIANCE WITH STANDARDS AND CRITERIA:
The following table depicts the consistency of the development proposal with the standards of
the Commercial General (CG) and Residential/Office Limited (R/OL) future land use plan
categories and the Commercial (C) and Office (0) Districts as per CDC Sections 2-701.1 and
2.1041.1 and Tables 2-704 and 2-1004.
Standard Proposed Consistent Inconsistent
FAR 0.5� 0.I 3 X
ISR 0.90 (CG) 0.70 X
0.75 (R/OL) 0.50
Minimum Lot Area N/A 84,141 square feet(1.93 acres) X
Minimum Lot Width N/A South: 185.01 feet X
West: 255 feet
Minimum Setbacks Front: N/A South: 15 feet(to pavement) X
1.2 feet(to building)
West: 3.9 feet(to pavement) X
1.1 feet(to building)
Side: N/A East: 33 feet(to pavement) X
114.3 feet(to building)
North: 157.8 feet(to building) X
Zero feet(to pavement)
West: Zero feet(to pavement) X
Maximum Height N/A 21.3 feet(mid-point of pitched roofl X
Minimum 15 spaces per 1,000 SF GFA 107 parking spaces X
Off-Street Parking (106 parking spaces required)
Community Development Board—November 15,2011
FLD201 1-09030—Page 7
COMPLIANCE WITH FLEXIBILITY CRITERIA:
The following table depicts the consistency of the development proposal with the Flexibility
criteria as per CDC Sections 2-704.0 and 2-10048 (Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment
Proj ect):
Consistent Inconsistent
1. The development or redevelopment is otherwise impractical without deviations from X
the use and/or development standards set forth in this zoning district.
2. The development or redevelopment will be consistent with the goals and policies of X
the Comprehensive Plan, as well as with the general purpose, intent and basic
planning objectives of this Code, and with the intent and purpose of this zoning
district.
3. The development or redevelopment will not impede the normal and orderly X
development and improvement of surrounding properties.
4. Adjoining properties will not suffer substantial detriment as a result of the proposed X
development
5. The proposed use shall otherwise be permitted by the underlying future land use X
category, be compatible with adjacent land uses, will not substantially alter the
essential use characteristics of the neighborhood; and shal] demonstrate compliance
with one or more of the following objectives:
a. The proposed use is permitted in this zoning district as a minimum standard,
flexible standard or flexible development use;
b. The proposed use would be a significant economic contributor to the City's
economic base by diversifying the local economy or by creating jobs;
c. The development proposal accommodates the expansion or redevelopment of an
existing economic contributor;
d. The proposed use provides for the provision of affordable housing;
e. The proposed use provides for development or redevelopment in an area that is
characterized by other similar development and where a land use plan
arnendment and rezoning would result in a spot land use or zoning designation;
or
£ The proposed use provides for the development of a new and/or preservation of a
working waterfront.
6. Flexibility with regard to use, lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street X
parking are justified based on demonstrated compliance with all of the following
design objectives:
a. The proposed development will not impede the normal and orderly development
and improvement of the surrounding properties for uses permitted in this zoning
district;
b. The proposed development complies with applicable design guidelines adopted
by the City;
c. The design, scale and intensity of the proposed development supports the
established or emerging character of an area;
d. In order to form a cohesive, visually interesting and attractive appearance, the
proposed development incorporates a substantial number of the following design
elements:
0 Changes in horizontal building planes;
❑ Use of architectural details such as columns, cornices, stringcourses,
pilasters,porticos,balconies,railings,awnings,etc.;
❑ Variety in materials,colors and textures;
❑ Distinctive fenestration patterns;
❑ Building step backs;and
❑ Distinctive roofs forms.
e. The proposed development provides for appropriate buffers,enhanced landscape
desi n and a ro riate distances between buildin s.
Community Development Board—November 15,2011
FLD201 1-09030—Page 8
COMPLIANCE WITH GENERAL STANDARDS FOR LEVEL TWO APPROVALS:
The following table depicts the consistency of the development proposal with the General
Standards for Level Two Approvals as per CDC Section 3-914.A:
Consistent Inconsistent
1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, X
coverage,density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located.
2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage development and use of X
adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof.
3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons X
residing or working in the neighborhood.
4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. X
5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the X
immediate vicinity.
6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including X
visual,acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts on adjacent properties.
SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION:
The Development Review Committee (DRC) reviewed the application and supporting materials
at its meeting of October 6, 2011, and deemed the development proposal to be legally sufficient
to move forward to the Community Development Board (CDB), based upon the following:
Findings of Fact. The Planning and Development Department, having reviewed all evidence
submitted by the applicant and requirements of the Community Development Code, finds that
there is substantial competent evidence to support the following findings of fact:
L The 1.93 acre property is located on the northeast corner of Hampton Road and Gulf to Bay
Boulevard;
2. That the subject property has two separate zoning classifications with the southern portion of
the property located within the Commercial (C) District and the Commercial General (CG)
Future Land Use Plan category and the northern portion of the property located within the
Office (0) District and the Residential/Office Limited (R/OL) Future Land Use Plan
category;
3. The subject property is the location of the original Hooters restaurant which consists of a
4,996 square foot restaurant and 111 parking spaces;
4. The subject property has a lot area of 84,141 square feet (1.93 acres), a lot width of 185.1
feet along Gulf to Bay Boulevard and 255 feet along Hampton Road;
5. The maximum allowable FAR for the Commercial General (CG) is 0.55. The proposed ISR
is 0.13;
6. The maximum allowable ISR for the Commercial General (CG) is 0.90. The proposed ISR is
0.70;
7. The maximum allowable ISR for the Residential/Office Limited (R/OL) is 0.75. The
proposed ISR is 0.50;
8. The application proposes to expand the existing restaurant by adding 2,138 square feet of
interior floor area;
Community Development Board—November 15,2011
FLD201 1-09030—Page 9
9. The proposal includes front and side setback reductions to recognize the location of the
existing building and pavement at less than the required setbacks, but also to provide for the
proposed building addition with front setbacks of 3.6 feet and 10.1 feet;
10. The building addition will be 15.4 feet in height (to top of parapet) and 21.3 feet (to mid-
point of pitched roo�;
1 l. The request includes a reduction to the front (south) perimeter landscape buffer from 15 feet
to 1.2 feet (along Gulf to Bay Boulevard), a reduction to the front (west) perimeter landscape
buffer from 10 feet to 1.1 feet (along Hampton Road}, a reduction to the side (east)
perimeter landscape buffer from 5 feet to 33 feet, a reduction to the side (north) perimeter
landscape buffer from 5 feet to zero feet, and a reduction of side (west) perimeter landscape
buffer of 5 feet to zero feet through the Comprehensive Landscape Program;
12. The wood deck (accessory structure) located at the southeast corner of on the subject
property does not serve the principal use, nor does it contribute to the comfort, convenience
or use of the principal use;
13. The proposed Comprehensive Landscape Program will provide additional landscaping within
green spaces and interior islands as well as retain a number of shade trees;
14. Based on the existing character of the surrounding area, the proposed building addition is
compatible and consistent with this character of the immediate area; and
15. There are no active Code Enforcement cases for the subject property.
Conclusions of Law. The Planning and Development Department, having made the above
findings of fact, reaches the following conclusions of law:
1. That the development proposal is consistent with the Standards as per Section 2-701.1 and
Table 2-704 of the Community Development Code;
2. That the development proposal is consistent with the Standards as per Section 2-1001.1 and
Table 2-1004 of the Community Development Code;
3. That the development proposal is consistent with the Flexibility criteria as per Sections 2-
704.0 of the Community Development Code;
4. That the development proposal is consistent with the Flexibility criteria as per Sections 2-
1004.B of the Community Development Code;
5. That the development proposal is consistent with the General Standards for Level Two
Approvals as per Section 3-914.A of the Community Development Code; and
6. That the development proposal is consistent with the criteria of the Comprehensive
Landscape Program as per Section 3-1202.G of the Community Development Code.
Based upon the above,the Planning and Development Department recommends APPROVAL of
this Flexible Development application to permit a 2,138 square foot addition to an existing 4,996
square foot restaurant in the Commercial (C) District and Office (0) District with a lot area of
84,141 square feet (1.93 acres), a lot width of 185.01 feet (along Gulf to Bay Boulevard) and 255
feet(along Hampton Road), front(south) setbacks of 15 feet (to proposed pavement} and 1.2 feet
(to building), front (west) setbacks of 3.9 feet (to proposed pavement) and 1.1 foot (to building),
side (east) setbacks of 33 feet (to pavement) and 114.3 feet (to proposed addition), side (north)
setbacks of 5.1 feet (to pavement) and 157.8 feet (to proposed addition), side (north) setback of
zero feet (to pavement), and a side (west) setback of zero feet (to pavement), a building height
of 15.8 feet (to top of parapet wall) and 21.3 feet (to mid-point of pitched roo�, and 107 off-
street parking spaces, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project under the provisions of
Community Development Board-November 15,2011
FLD2011-09030-Page 10
the Community Development Code sections 2-704.C. and 2-1004.B., as well as reduction to the
front (south)perimeter buffer from 15 feet to 1.2 feet (along Gulf to Bay Boulevard), a reduction
to the front (west) perimeter buffer from 10 feet to l.l feet (along Hampton Road), a reduction
to the side (east) perimeter buffer from 5 feet to 3.3 feet, a reduction to the side (north) perimeter
buffer from 5 feet to zero feet, and a reduction of side (west} perimeter buffer of 5 feet to zero
feet, and a reduction to the parking lot interior island standard for existing interior islands from 8
feet greenspace (from back of curb to back of curb) and 150 square feet to 7.8 feet greenspace
(from back of curb to back of curb) and 143 square feet and 7.9 feet greenspace (from back of
curb to back of curb) and 147 square feet as a Comprehensive Landscape Program under the
provisions of the Community Developrnent Code Section 3-1202.G., subject to the following
conditions:
Conditions of Approval:
l. That a building permit be obtained for the parking lot improvements, landscaping and
building improvements;
2. That the final design, color, and elevations of the proposed architectural modifications and
color changes to the building be consistent with the design, color, and elevations approved by
the CDB;
3. That the dumpster enclosure shall be made of a masonry wall of similar material,
architectural details and colors as the proposed addition;
4. That prior to issuance of any building permit, the applicant shall comply with any
outstanding comments from the Engineering Department.
5. That prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Completion, the applicant shall apply for a
demolition permit to remove the accessory structure (wood deck) and submit evidence that
the accessory structure (wood deck)in the side (east) yard has been removed;
6. That all existing and any future signage must meet the requirements of Code and be
architecturally integrated with the design of the building with regard to proportion, color,
material and finish as part of a final sign package submitted to and approved by Staff;
7. That prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy, all of the proposed landscaping shall
be installed; and
8. That prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Completion, the applicant must install any/all
landscape materials missing, dead or unhealthy from the northern parking area as per the
previously approved landscape plan for the site, and that any mate ' being installed are to
be Florida Grade#1.
Prepared by Planning and Development Department Staff:
K in W. Nurnberger, Planner III
ATTACHMENTS:Location Map;Aerial Map;Zoning Map;Existing Sunounding Uses Map;and Photographs
S:IPlanning DeparhnentlC D BIFLEX(FLD)IPending caseslUp for the next CDBIGuIf to Bay 2800-Hooters(C)&(0)-2011.xx-
KWNIHooters 2800 G to B-Staff Report.docx
Community Development Board—November 15,2011
FLD201 1-09030—Page 11
I
Kevin W.Nurnberger
100 S Myrtle Avenue
Clearwater,FL 33756
727-562-4567
kevin.mitnber er,nao,myclearwater.com
PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE
Planner III March 2011 to present
Planner II October 2010 to March 2011
City of Clearwater, Clearwater, Florida
Duties include performing the technical review and preparation of staff reports for various land
development applications, the organization of data and its display in order to track information and
provide status reports, and making presentations to various City Boards and Committees.
Planner
County of York, Yorktown, Virginia 2007 to 2009
Reviewed residential, commercial and mixed use development site plans to ensure compliance with
planning, zoning, subdivision, historic preservation, and environmental standards as well as design
criteria, specifications, regulations, codes and ordinances. Led pre-application meetings with residents,
neighborhood organizations, contractors, and developers regarding future projects which included state
and local government agencies.
Site Assistant
Gahan and Long Ltd, Belfast, Northern Ireland 2006 to 2007
Enforced Article 3 of the Planning Order (NI) with land owners, developers and district councils on
procedures relating to archaeological and built heritage remains on proposed development sites. On site
assistant to project manager during the archeological process throughout the pre-development stage.
Development Planner
Versar Inc, Fort Story/Fort Eustis, Virginia 2005 to 2006
Developed survey strategies for the Cultural Resource Manager by reviewing local and state planning
documents, the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Preservation Planning on Federal installations,
the Virginia Department of Historic Resources, the Virginia Department of Transportation plan, and
Virginia Power's public utility plan in the predevelopment stages of new development and building
expansion projects to ensure protection of historic properties.
City Planner
City Planning Commission, New Orleans, Louisiana 2000 to 2005
Primary subdivision planner assisting applicants throughout the subdivision process in accordance with
the zoning and subdivision regulations of the City of New Orleans. Reviewed various zoning and
conditional use applications. Prepared and presented staff reports to the Ciiy Planning Commission and
Board of Zoning Adjustments.
EDUCATION
University of New Orleans,LA
MA Urban and Regional Planning(2004)
State University of New York at Buffalo,NY
BA Anthropology(1999)
DREW ST
> � y y
� m 2,° 2
v a �m
°' Cambridge Cir. � PROJECT
� � S�TE
M QP�r F � 9a W �:_..z Iv.�• �
°�a a L�
G_ � D
o ,-� �
Z j � --
O $
Y a d
� � m ar�:s
Q N
a w
SR-60 GULF-TO-
Q U
�
O
Y
N '- F
Z
�
O
2
H
.� vh, `l���.��
O �``��I. � �v ' ...'�
; '.; �; '.'.` .i
� . . . .
P� r � /t.�' f 8 �; . .. �; • .
f� . . . .
SEVILLE BLVD 1• ' . • • �
,0� .: ,, :: ,, .':
\ , ': .. , '; .. . ..
�'� • .. .. .. .. . .. ., .. ....
� Pearce pr t�`r�. • .. , ' ., : .. , .
�'�. .. . •
LOCATION
Owner: Limited Properties, Inc Case: FLD201 1-09030
Hooters Management Corporation
Site: 2800 Gulf to Bay Boulevard Property Size: 1.93 acres
PIN: 17-29-16-00000-130-0700 Atlas Page: 291 B
208 209
d
21 213 208 � Z
y
,��`' O 21 s 217 ? z
ry
5 2zo W n�
� z�
300 Q 301
� �
�ss tititi 30 Q 305 MDR 2,
30B 309
30
■
��� 312 313
� 33
375 � 33
■
320 321 332
CL 32 325
38
40
401
� 407
404
28f0*
i 413
_
¢ ¢
N p N V N
� (�p n o01 opi O N M h b
N N � N N N N N N N
GULF-TO-BAY BLVD
GULF-TO-BAY BLVD
�
� � " �� "
N N N N N
�M
W
�
�
�5 MDR
ZONING
Owner: Limited Properties, Inc Case: FLD201 1-09030
Hooters Management Corporation
Site: 2800 Gulf to Bay Boulevard Property Size: 1.93 acres
PIN: 17-29-16-00000-130-0700 Atlas Page: 291 B
� 14 20 209 24
� 13/09 13
21 213 205 y �
� � 13 z`' 5.49 A� � a
ry Z O 21 217 ? ?
�78
O i�as 12 26
� g
� 2.59 A c cc� �� 220 , 221 27 '
= p Q 301 W
10 r � Q 28 �
p �
�ss � ��� I I30 � 305 �mou«�.�.
s � � zs
o ���0 309 30 a
2aoa g
6.16 Ac�c� ■ ��� 31 313
■ 7 g� iarzs 33
375 � 33
se � 6 31 317
sz r — �
� L 02573 � 1
32 321
5 33 �
"'06 3y 325
4 34 iy�oi 38
32 = — �— — �arzs
3 35 � 40
ao�z — — 401
zao�i ���
�yo� 2404 36 I
zaai _
zaoz — � 38 iaoei
2810 413 O
1.59 A c�c> 1.65 A c�c� t 1•67 A c�c> ' 1.03 A c�c� �
¢ ¢ � s� �
ap N � a0 O N
A n N n 1� � o�p N eo � N N N
N N N N
74
$ n � $ � GULF-TO-BAY BLVD
GUL -TO-BAY BLVD
h� �
� � �, �� �
^ ^ N N N
N N
3 <
2
535
EXISTING CONDITIONS
Owner: Limited Properties, Inc Case: FLD2011-09030
Hooters Management Corporation
Site: 2800 Gulf to Bay Boulevard Property Size: 1.93 acres
PIN: 17-29-16-00000-130-0700 Atlas Page: 291 B
. f � ' �� � ;' � �
{. ��� .� �� t P �v .
R�4 ;�� `�,�, ,�` x r�� � �`� � '* S:� 1�� •�R! c � s.
. . �7��� Y" :i Z
�
� o
a� �� � � � f ,.,� " ''� � _ ?
,P �t � ��'1� � x,
..��t �4 '` } % i $ �_
�,�� `4. � }� �
K c t � G � �
.
;
_ 'v • � � - -
, '� `'" — J '-
�:>t : • .� � �� - '� t x �*
�k } �+* .�' '� 9, �. " ' '�w � � ��� �a` +4
* �d t'���v.r j#� �� p�'i_ ,�y�. � � t
� �� �� �% i.. :� ,�y r .�-,Y.. � • `,*' : �t+ Y
' i �����i-� • . ..
�
r "r �
'
, '.
t ��*, ' ,� � � r t q� � ,�� t
, �•�'�'�'�.h • �,.;5 ��� s� �� -
tl��,, o*�
.f>
k `•
i � �` ~; � u t> �
� �' �a= a5 . . � , �� � a�'�� .. y �:..
i k
. .�t � }R;`�§1z!S.
� �' 4i" . �1�`�t ?��
. : .- .
�
,, �
(�iiaJ '�� � �! If � �y µ .� �� � , �� �� ?
� ,, � +� �'? +° + - �,A` � l;�r � � �4
�, , '` *' `k�. � � '� �� , , `�_: '
I , i; ''�� }�r�����*? �.'�� j � � t f ` m a 3aa=:-! ; ..
�, .
?' ', � ,
�� "
� �,���;,} .,` ' ip9,�3�39��� � �, t ���� ,� $ - ,
4 1 i' .� i+
�++��,�1 � ., f 1 :d. �' �""`��y" �
� riY��'l,J ���9� � i � �f� � � 3���'d`�'id��.a �' �,,
�`�'%'�%�►•l�Ea:,S R.t� `` ' � r.�.t,!... �, � .�
�
nr;r� -n,�+ » n�n ay_ - p
_ ' __ . ,:
i'�,,, �,e� I,CILI=.I`t?-L-'!�1 L"LlL - �.,,,
i , _ ,., �..
� .�. r ., ' . ' .....�...- . .
-�r/ �I� ,,,�� � .�"�rj• � .. . `�j�_ (�'� , �� Y, �/F,.%. � .�� .
,_r �'���������`:" ,9;:l+��t1'1�';.�+�,����T �,����� /,� �.,. ����'
. ..r'/;. ,� r��. '� ..31 j `�,. ;6,
�yv. -;
.
r., a..'� . . i .�T
' � i
� !"f sT"
� ;��; . .
� f _ _
„ .� , �� A . _ �� �
;_ • � - - - _ ,� , , .- .- - , � -
� �,,
��"� �; !'' -`"°- " �� � �,IM , I
;c � 4 '� � °.� ; E` 1'�ss.
,�r ' r�} :�,;_ �,,� �a^�-'�;V, r
�� � � *: � *4,�, �',.� t
''` --
AERIAL
Owner: Limited Properties, Inc Case: FLD201 1-09030
Hooters Management Corporation
Site: 2800 Gulf to Bay Boulevard Property Size: 1.93 acres
PIN: 17-29-16-00000-130-0700 Atlas Page: 291 B
� � � + �
�
��.'�� ;�' »
� �. '.
�,t�.J�+f�+.'.,'. � �'�, t�'
� „
�d
ti _ ,
� � l
�'"°-„` i�
, ��� 1�� ,
, l.
� -- � � ��!�'.� '� �`I� �.
�---.
�_�. _
s�,,;"` �a�,` — '� ,,. � � ; ,
w ;':��*� � r.n,z�s. . �',�; �� t�,
.�" r� . �?`. _ .
,
� �k r, t ��'" ���e �,s ��y�y�
,'"� �., r �, �, s� (
�}' `� '"n'�n.l'sj�� �,.ii"' ,�4"'`. �t.. .
s R, •;*'' X .
Looking W at subject property along Gulf to Bay Blvd. Looking E at subject properiy from Gulf to bay Blvd.
��;� , �
i t �r
{' ;
��a: � ' � ; i
. -. '�
o f"' y ,�
�'� �• '+
� KK, T
. •�i._ 1��-° '�'�� ��� .�� I
!
, __
„ � _
��.:
��.
. � ��� . � �,.
;;y .�&°'l,wrla ��.;�iat<,�,4i4.�� ,;;,'rr �,, ;i;p, .�r�,,,.ii��'a
' ' � I I� �Y i i ' _
.. _ .' ,, � v ,�I��
� .
, � �
,
.. ��. ,_ ..�,. .. ., . .� .
�
�,rYa����. . .. . _.
Looking N at subject property along Hampton Road Looking S along Hampton Road towards subject property
and Gulf to Bay Blvd.
,�� �----�..�_ � •J,
.�-��� .e.. � �.y�.•�. .
p� ! r � -`'�
�k r'
,... n 1f11' ' ,�n��.-- � �.
�
' i�SM � e� .i i� .�w�. ,k� ���
��` ��� -;✓�, � ;.i. ''11"' i. � � �'h� .
_ �
� F
t q � r
. . '3' �i�E1tt�.'.��ir��.+.i . . �' .�.. �. -
_— '.
' �r,r�. �� �
� .. s• �''C, .
y .
� � •�S ''�
� .
.y� :. -. .,� 'r ,;c•'
} � ,.
w '"�� �p�e
} �
.,���- .. ".. . .. ��:�,� ;,C�. r `�/'v+ � � . "-,� -
x}��'9j t'� i � t �_tiY','Tr! �':'�N��� t v..-�n a
. , . �� •� � A �,�." �
� ' f Y4�L;. �.
.. ! ';�`�.�. �Y ��� §v �'4 ''��
��• .y v ys
• '. .�'(�,�y> r`'�� y '*1�:" y,a:
. . - �w. .���',t �:.1.�� . . ..�{• � �i.�' ..:�°S -.. . � ..
Looking W at existing outdoor seating area. Looking at eastern building far�ade where most
• modifications to site and building will occur.
2800 Gulf to Bay Boulevard
FLD2011-09030
., , , w Civil
.
Lnnd Planning
D«e Diligence Reports
�
Re-Zonin�,Land Use,Annexation
,�'��x��-r�C�����G� .��'lt�G`�t� °��W�°.. - _ ' � � Stormwater Management
Utility Design '
October 12, 2011 Traffic
Constructian Administration
City of Clearwater
Planning & Development Review Department
Kevin Numberger, Planner III
100 S. Myrtle Avenue
Clearwater, rlorida 33756
RE: FLD2011-09030 -2800 Gulf to Bay Blvd.
Hooters Management Corporation
Dear Mr. Numberger,
Below please find our responses to the DRC comments associated with the above referenced project:
Engineering Review Prior to review by the Community Development Board:
1. Sheet C1.2 was not reviewed. This level of detail is not required for this submittal and will
be reviewed at building perrriit ;r;� ���tir°������� � � � .
Public Utilities Comments
L �Protect all water lines during construction.
2. Must protect sewer infrastructure during construction.
3. C�r,±act Rob Powers in Industrial Pretreatment for details and proper sizing of grease traps.
Acknowledge above before Community�evelopment Board
General Note: If the proposed project necessitates infrastructure modification to satisfy site-specific
water capacity and pressure requirements and/or wastewater capacity requirements, the
modifications shall be completed by the applicant and at their expense. If underground water mains
and hydrants are to be installed, the installation shall be completed and in service prior to
construction in accordance with Fire Department requirements.
General Note: DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may
be forth coming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application.
NES Response: Item 1 and Items 1-3 Including General Notes 1 and 2 are hereby acknowledged.
300 SouCh Be.lcfier Roarl
�le��•watei:rlorida 33�'65 1
tech��norr..hsid�engineeringservices.com
727�143 28E>�J �ax 77_7 �#d{6 �3Q3�, ;:,,, : . ,
' Environmental Review � ` �"` �
,. , N
DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may be forthcoming
upon submittal of a Building Permit Application.
Pp�ase Note: An asbestos Survey is usually required prior to conducting any demolition or
renovations. Please contact Pinellas County Air Quality (464-4422) for further information.
� ...
NES Response: Acknowledgec�; adaitional_comments may be forthcoming'�ased upon submittal
of a Building Permit Application and asbestos survey will be recpui�ed the Proposed demolition and/or
renovations.
Fire Review
1. Pl�n shows a total sc�uare foot�ge �vith the neu� addition of 7,08q sq�aare feet a fire sprinkler system is
accordance with 2002 NFPA 13 is required. PRIOR TO CDB
Architect Response: If determined to be required, fire sprinkler system in accordance with 2002
NFPA 13 will be provided prior to permitting.
2. 12.3.4 Detection, Alarm, and Communications Systems. 12.3.4.1 General. Assembly occupancies with
occupant loads of more than 300 and all theaters with more than one audience-viewing room shall be
provided with an approved fire alarm system in accordance with 9.6.1 and 12.3.4, unless otherwise
permitted by the following: this will be a voice evacuation. ACKNOWLDEGE PRIOR TO CDB
Architect Response: Acknowledged, use is restaurant and will have an occupant load of less than
300; if determined ta be required, an appraved fire alarm system in accordance with 9.6.1 and 12.3.4
will be provided prior to permitting. ,
I�'s�r�._ �
3. A supporting fire hydrant shall be within 25-50 feet of the Fire Department Connection. Note this will
be in addition to the fire hydrant shown,to'meet the 300 feet as the hose lays. ACKNOWLEDGE
PRIOR TO CT�B� .
a .
,,.
NES Response: yf�Acki�°a����dged, if fire sprinkler system is required FDC, DCVA and FHA will be
provided on plans prior to permitting. v�� ��- �- '' `
4. Must meet the requirement of FAC 69A60 Florida Fire Prevention code to install signage at entry doors
to identify if this building has been constructed with lightweight truss floor and road system. You may
contact this office for a copy of details at 727-562-4327 x 3062.
ACKNOWLEDGE PRIOR TO CDB
Architect Response: Acknowledged.
2
5. Sheet C3.1 shows a Dumpster Enclosure 10 x 20, note All dumpsters, and any screening which consists
of coinbustible fencing around the dumpster pad shall have a minimum separation from the nearest
building or building overhang of ten feet (10') ACKNOWLEDGE PRIOR TO CDB
NES Response: Please see revised Civil Sheet C3.1 providing new location for dumpster and
enclosure which is more than 10' from the building and/or building overhang.
6. Note to be addressed at time of construction, separate permits for hood system, fire suppression, fire
alarm, fire sprinlcler ACKNOWLEDGE PRIOR TO CDB
Architect Response: Acknowledged.
I.and Kesources -� �
1. Also show to be removed tree #9�s this tree is declining.
NES Reskaonse: � Acknowledged, please see revised plans, Tree#9 shown to be removed. ,
2. Acknowledge"'�1��t a certi�ed arborist will supervise and perform the requirements set forth ori
the Tree Preservation Plan shee� L�.? �
NES Response: Acknowledged, Contractor ar�� �eveloper have been informed that a certi�ied
arborist will supervise and perform the requirements set forth in the Tree Preservation Plan Sheet
L1.3.
Plannin� Review (Items 1-6 Required Prior to CDB)
1. The wood deck (bandstand) within the east side setback does not appear from a site inspection an
accessory structure that serves the principle use on the subject property. This accessory structure (deck)
does not meet most of the standards for an accessory structure as set forth in CDC Section 3-904;
therefore, the structure shall be removed unless the applicant can provide documentation that the deck as
been legally permitted.
NES Response: Please see Civil Sheet C2.1 wood deck is shown to be demolished.
2. Based upon the revised boundary survey and site plan, there are a total of 111 proposed parking spaces
on the subject property. A shared parking agreement is not necessary since the required number of
parking spaces (106 spaces) has been provided in accordance with the standards set forth in CDC
Section 2-702.
- 3
_ � . . .„�,... -
NES Response: The final required parking count is 107 required parking spaces, 107 parking spaces
exists on site (5 handicap), please see revised plans.
3. CDC Section 3-1409 requires 5 handicap parking spaces for a property with i 11 parking spaces; only 4
are shown on the plan. Provide an additional handicap parking space.
NES Response: Please see revised Site Plan pt-oviding 5 handicap parking spaces as required for 107
parking �paces. �
4. The dumpSter_,should be a minimum of 10 feet from the building. This may result in a reduction to the
loading space area anct'�re�uire a relocation/reconfiguration of the proposed enclosed dumpster.
Architect Response: The dumpster has been relocated anc� as more than 10' away from any building
and/or overhang, the loading zone has also been adjusted.
5. Before reconfiguring location of ciumpster determine that the proposed soiid waste container is of a
sufficient size to serve the use to which they are accessory with the Solid Waste Department.
NES ResPonse: As directed by the Solid Waste Department a 10' x 24' dumpster and enclosure have
been provided, please see revised plans.
6. In regards to the loading space, the required one off-street loading space shall measure not less than 12
feet in width and 35 feet in length, exclusive of aisle and maneuvering spaces, and shall have a vertical
clearance of at least 14 feet. Off-street loading shall be strategically located as near as possible to a
service entrance and designed to accommodate all vehicles on site without obstructing aisles or parking
spaces as set forth in CDC Section 3-1406.
NES Response: Acknowledged, loading space has been reconfigured and meets the above referenced
Section.
7. Ensure that all information provided in the Site Data Table accurately reflects the information shown on
the plan such as the number of parking spaces etc. Also, it is important that the boundary survey and
site plan each accurately reflect existing cons�itic�ns�or each will need to be re�ised prior to moving this
project any further also in the Flexible Development process.
NES Response: T'h� Site Date�Table ha'��been.revised and correctly reflects the information on the
plans. The parking space count has been revised to include all full spaces encompassed within the
propertyEboundary as directed at DRC.
, � "h.
r,
8. The entire property "ii�ust�be-included as a part of the landscape plan and Comprehensive Landscape
Program as shown on revised bo�ndary survey a�d site plan.
NES Response: The northern area of the site was developed more recently and approved under the
current code. The Developers agree to replace any missing, dead or dying plantings determined
necessary at time of inspection as per our discussion and agreement at DRC.
4
Solid Waste Review
l. Center Dumpster pad is not fully to code. Staging pad or full enclosure? Used for garbage service or
recycle containers? Dumpster on present design would only be able accommodate 4 yard Dumpster on
wheels maximum.
NES Response: As Per our discussion at DRC the center dumpster is intended to remain and is used
for recycling. The revised plans provide a 10' x 24' dumpster as per your kind direction at DRC, the
dumpster has also been re-oriented to allow more ease of access.
Stormwater Review
The following shall be addressed prior to Community Development Board:
l. The outfall of the vault is flat and appears to alter the historic flow path of the existing storm water
system. The outfall of the on-site stormwater system shall continue to connect to the FDOT drainage
system or verify there will be no adverse impacts resulted from alteration.
,'.t f I+ _
NES Response: The outfall from the vault will�be directed to the existing connection point in the
FDOT drainage system.
� � � ���4 3 :�,y�.,�... . _ � ,
2. Please submit•a copy of the FDOT drainage connection application and/or a pre-application meeting
notes����� � �
NES Response: ` P���se.�ee provided FDOT Drainage Connection Permit Application
3. Please provide soil analysis demonstrating that the praposec� ;���d �utiom is 6" higher than the Seasonal
High Water Table, as required by the City's criteria. If this criterion is not met, vault and pond shall be
to be isolated from ground water infiltration.
NES Response: Please see soil analysis provided within the drainage calculations, the underdrain
at the retention pond isolates ground water infiltration and a solid bottom has been provided within
the vault. Also, please see provided buoyancy calculations for the vault on Civil Sheet C5.2.
4. Submit the draw down analysis showing the pond and the vault draw down their volume within 24
hours.
NES Response: Please see draw down analysis within the provided drainage calculations,vault
draw down analysis is no longer required due to the proposed concrete bottom within the vault.
5. Provide a detail for each of the 2 proposed control structures. Which control structure the weir design in
the drainage report belongs to? Please verify and revise the weir design data accordingly.
NES Response: Please see Civil Sheet C5.1
,
5
6. Pond and Vault shall have a minimum freeboard of 6".
NES Response: Please see drainage calculations providing 6" free board.
7. Provide the vault's stage storage table.
NES ResPonse: See provided drainage c�lculations which include the vault's stage storage table.
Traffic En�ineerin� Review Prior to a Community Development Board hearing:
. . , .; Q .
1. Create a crosswalk with truncated domes at the end of the one-way porte cochere. '
NES Response: "� Please see revised plans, porte cochere has been removed from the design.
2. Porte cochere sha11 be a minimum of 114 inches per Florida Buildi�g Code Chapter 11 Section 11-
4.6.5.
NES Response: Please see revised plans, porte cochere has been removed from the design.
3. Provide truncated dome mats on curb ramps along Hampton Road and S.R. 60 per FDOT Standards
use Index 304 page 6 of 6.
NES Response: Please see revised Civil Sheet C5.1 for FDOT Index 304.
General Note(s):
l. Applicant shall comply with the current Transportation Impact Fee Ordinance and fee schedule and
paid prior to a Certificate of Occupancy.
2. DRC review is a prerequisite for Bu8ilding Permit Review; additional comments may be forth
coming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application.
NES Response: Acknowledged.
We trust this information is sufficient to respond to the DRC comments and will allow the project to move
forward to the Community Development Board.c�"�Y�n�'�ddiYional items can arid will be addressed at time of
Building Permit Application. � -
Please feel free to ccntact us if you have qt�EStions�or require additional information.
Sincerely, �
Renee Ruggiero, Senior Pr �ect Planner
Northside Engineering Services, Inc.
6
�a Planning Department CASE#:
- l�ar�vat r 100 South Myrtle Avenue RECEIVED BY (staff initials):
. � � Clearwater Florida 33756 DATE RECEIVED:
�
�., Telephone: 727-562-4567
Fax: 727-562-4865
❑ SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APP�ICATION
❑ SUBMIT 14 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION-Plans and � -.
application are required to be collated,stapled,and folded into sets
❑ SUBMIT FIRE PRELIMARY S�TE PLAN:$200.00
❑ SUBMIT.APPLICATION FEE$
* NOTE:15 TOTAL SETS OF INFORMATION REQUIRED (APPLICATIONS PLUS SITE PLAN SETS)
�'�,E�I]BL� �EV�'�,�PM�l�'T "�PP�,ICATI�ll�
Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project
(Revised 07/11/2008)
�PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT�
A. APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A)
APPLICANT NAME: Limited Properties, Inc. c/o Hooters Management Corporation
MAILING ADDRESS: 107 Hampton Road, Suite 200, Clearwater, FL 33759
PHONE NUMBER: 727-725-2551 FAX NUMBER:
CELL NUMBER EMAIL:
PROPERTY OWNER(S): Limited Properties, Inc.
List ALL owners on the deed
Northside Engineering Services, Inc. Housh Ghovaee, CEO
AGENT NAME: Renee Ruggiero, Senior Project Planner
MAILING ADDRESS: 300 S. Belcher Road, Clearwater, FL 33756
PHONE NUMBER: 727-443-2869 FAX NUMBER: 727-443-8036
CELLNUMBER: 727-235-8475 (Renee Ruggiero) EMAIL: Renee@Northsideengineering.net
B. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A)
PROJECT NAME: Hooters Management°�'C'orporation PROJECT VALUATION: $ 550,000.00
STREETADDRESS 2800 Gulf to Bay Boulevard, Clearwater, FL 33759 � -
PARCELNUMBER(S): 17-29-16-00000-130-0700
PARCEL SIZE(acres): 1.93 AcreS PARCEL SIZE(square feet): 84,066 sq. ft.
LEGAL DESC.RIPTION: See Attached Legal Description
PROPOSED USE(S): Restaurant
DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST: See Attached Narrative
Specifically identify the request
(include number of units or square
footage of non-residential use and all
requested code deviations;e.g.
reduction in required number of
parking spaces,specific use,etc.)
C:\Documents and Settings\derek.ferguson\Desktop\planning dept forms 0708\Comprehensive Infill Project(FLD)2008 07-11.doc
Page 1 of 8
DOES THIS APPLICATION INVOLVE THE TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS (TDR), A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED PLANNED UNI
DEVELOPMENT,OR A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED(CERTIFIED)SITE PLAN? YES_ NO X (if yes,attach a copy of the applicable documents)
C. PROOF OF OWNERSHIP: (Code Section 4-202.A.5)
❑ SUBMIT A COPY OF THE TITLE INSURANCE POLICY, DEED TO THE PROPERTY OR SIGN AFFIDAVIT ATTESTING OWNERSHIP (see
Pa9e�)
D. WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 3-913.A)
❑ Provide complete responses to the six(6)GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA—Explain how each criteria is achieved,in detail:
1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk,coverage,density and character of adjacent properties in which it
is located.
See Attached Narrative
2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly
impair the value thereof.
See Attached Narrative
3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use.
See Attached Narrative
4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion.
See Attached Narrative
5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development.
See Attached Narrative
6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts, on
adjacent properties.
See Attached Narrative
C:\Documents and Settings\derek.fergusonlDesktop\planning dept forms 0708\Comprehensive Infill Project(FLD)2008 07-11.doc
Page 2 of 8
WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project Criteria)
❑ Provide complete responses to the six(6)COMPREHENSIVE INFILL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT CRITERIA—Explain how each criteria is
achieved,in detail:
1. The development or redevelopment is otherwise impractical without deviations from the use and/or development standards set forth in this
zoning district.
See Attached Narrative
2. The development or redevelopment will be consistent with the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan, as well as with the general
purpose, intent and basic planning.objectives of this Code,and with the intent and purpose of this zoning district
See Attachecl Narrative
3. The development or reclevelopment wili nof impede the normal and orderly devefopment and improvement of surrounding properties.
See Attached Narrative
4. Adjoining properties will not suffer substantial detriment as a result of the proposed development.
See Attached Narrative
5. The proposed use shall otherwise be permitted by the underlyi�g future land use category, be compatible with adjacent land uses, will not
substantially alter the essential use characteristics of the neighborhood; and shall demonstrate compliance with one or more of the following
objectives:
a. The proposed use is permitted in this zoning district as a minimum standard,flexibie standard or flexible development use;
b. The proposed use would be a significant economic contributor to the City's economic base by diversifying the local economy or by creating
jobs;
c. The development proposal accommodates the expansion or redevelopment of an existing economic contributor;
d. The proposecl use provides for the provision of affordable housing;
e. The proposed use provides for development or redevelopment in an area that is characterized by other similar development and where a
land use plan amendment and rezoning would result in a spot land use or zoning designation;or
f. The proposed use provides for the development of a new and/or preservation of a working waterfront use.
See Attached Narrative
6. Flexibility with regard to use,lot width, required setbacks,height and off-street parking are justified based on demonstrated compliance with all of
the following design objectives: ;_.�,:�:•�-
a. The proposed development will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of the surrounding properties for uses
permitted in this zoning district;
b. The proposed development complies with applicable design guidelines adopted by the City;
c. The design,scale and intensity of the proposed development supports the established or emerging character of an area;
d. In order to form a cohesive,visually interesting and attractive appearance,the proposed development incorporates a substantial number of
the following design elements:
❑ Changes in horizontal building planes,
❑ Use of architectural details such as columns,cornices,stringcourses,pilasters,porticos,balconies, railings,awnings,etc.;
❑ Variety in materiais,colors and textures;
❑ Distinctive fenestration patterns;
❑ Building stepbacks;and
❑ Distinctive roofs forms.
e. The proposed development provides for appropriate buffers,enhanced landscape design and appropriate distances between buildings.
See Attached Narrative
C:\Documents and Settings\derek.ferguson\Desktop\planning dept forms 0708\Comprehensive lnfill Project(FLD)2008 07-11.doc
Page 3 of 8
E. STORMWATER PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMEtdTS: (City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteria
Manual and 4-202.A.21)
❑ A STORMWATER NARRATIVE MUST BE SUBMITTED WITH ALL APPLICATIONS.All applications that involve addition
or modification of impervious surface, including buildings, must include a stormwater plan that demonstrates compliance with the City of
Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteria manual.A reduction in impervious surface area does not qualify as an exemption to this requirement.
❑ If a plan is not required,the narrative shall provide an explanation as to why the site is exempt.
❑ At a minimum,the STORMWATER PLAN shall include the foliowing;
❑ Existing iopography extending 50 feet beyond all property lines;
❑ Proposed grading including finished floor elevations of all structures;
❑ All adjacent streets and municipal storm systems;
❑ Proposed stormwater detention/retention area inciuding top of bank,toe of slope and outlet control structure;
❑ A narrative describing the proposed stormwater control plan including all calculations and data necessary to demonstrate compliance with
the City manual.
❑ Proposed stormwater detention/retention area including top of bank,toe of slope and outlet control structure;
❑ Signature and seal of Florida Registered Professional Engineer on ali plans and calculations.
❑ COPY OF PERMIT INQUIRY LETTER OR SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT (SWFWMD) PERMIT
SUBMITTAL.(SWFWMD approval is required prior to issuance of City Building Permit),if applicable
❑ ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF STORMWATER PLAN REQUIREMENTS(Applicant must initial one of the following):
HG Stormwater plan as noted above is included
Stormwater plan is not required and explanation narrative is attached. At a minimum, a grading plan and finished floor
elevations shall be provided.
CAUTION — IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN �WE REQUIREMENT FOR A STORMWATER PLAN
AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED,APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY
MAY OCCUR.
If you have questions regarding these requirements,contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at(727)562-4750.
F. SUPPLEMENTAL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 4-202.A)
❑ SIGNED AND SEALED SURVEY(including legai description of property)-One original and 14 copies;
❑ TREE SURVEY (including existing trees on site and within 25' of the adjacent site, by species, size (DBH 4" or greater), and location,
including drip lines and indicating trees to be removed)-please design around the existing trees;
❑ TREE INVENTORY; prepared by a "certified arborisY', of all trees 4" DBH or greater, reflecting size, canopy(drip lines)and condition of
such trees,
❑ LOCATION MAP OF THE PROPERTY;
❑ PARKING DEMAND STUDY in conjunction with a request to make deviations to the parking standards (ie. Reduce number of spaces).
Prior to the submittal of this application,the methodology of such study shall be approved by the Community Development Coordinator and
shall be in accordance wikh accepted traffic engineering principles. The findings of the study will be used in determining whether or not
deviations to the parking standards are approved; N/A Per Rbt Tefft - Please see provided Parking Analysis
❑ GRADING PLAN,as applicable;
❑ PRELIMINARY PLAT,as required(Note: Building permits will not be issued until evidence of recording a final plat is provided);
❑ COPY OF RECORDED PLAT,as applicable;
C:\Documents and Settings\derek.ferguson\Desktop\planning dept forms 0708\Comprehensive Infill Project(FLD)2008 07-11.doc
Page 4 of 8
G. SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A)
❑ SITE PLAN with the following information(not to exceed 24"x 36"):
Index sheet referencing individual sheets included in package;
North arrow;
Engineering bar scale(minimum scale one inch equals 50 feet),and date prepared;
All dimensions;
Footprint and size of all EXISTING buildings and structures;
Footprint and size of all PROPOSED buildings and structures;
All required setbacks;
All existing and proposed points of access;
All required sight triangles;
Identification of environmentally unique areas, such as watercourses, wetlands, tree masses, and specimen trees, including
_ description and location of understory,ground cover vegetation and wildlife habitats,etc;Location of all public and private easements;
Location of all street rights-of-way within and adjacent to the site;
Location of existing public and private utilities, including fire hydrants, storm and sanitary sewer lines, manholes and lift stations, gas
and water lines;
All parking spaces,driveways,loading areas and vehicular use areas;
Depiction by shading or crosshatching of all reauired parking iot interior landscaped areas;
Location of all solid waste containers,recycling or trash handling areas and outside mechanical equipment and all required screening
_ {perSection 3-201(D)(i)and Index#701};
Location of all landscape material;
Location of all onsite and offsite storm-water management facilities;
Location of all outdoor lighting fixtures;
Location of all existing and proposed sidewalks;and
Floor plan typicals of buildings for all Level Two approvals. A floor plan of each floor is required for any parking garage requiring a
Level Two approval.
❑ SITE DATA TABLE for existing, required,and proposed development,in written/tabular form:
EXISTING REQUIRED PROPOSED
Land area in square feet and acres;
Nurnber of EXISTING dwelling units; See Site Data Table Provided on Civil Plans
Nurnber of PROPOSED dwelling units;
Gross floor area devoted to each use;
Parking spaces: total number, presented in tabular form with the
number of required spaces;
Total paved area, including all paved parking spaces& driveways,
_ expressed in square feet&percentage of the paved vehicular area;
Official records book and page numbers of all existing utility
easement;
Building and structure heights;
Impermeable surface ratio(I.S.R.);and
Floor area ratio(F.A.R.)for ali nonresidential uses.
0 REDUCED COLOR SITE PLAN to scale(8'/Z X 11);
❑ FOR DEVELOPMENTS OVER ONE ACRE,provide the follo�ing additional information on site plan:
One-foot contours or spot elevations on site;
Offsite elevations if required to evaluate the proposed stormwater management for the parcel;
All open space areas;
Location of all earth or water retaining walls and earth berms;
Lot lines and building lines(dimensioned);
Streets and drives(dimensioned);
Building and structural setbacks(dimensioned);
Structural overhangs;
C:\Documents and Settings\derek.fergusonlDesktop\planning dept forms 0708\Comprehensive Infill Project(FLD)2008 07-11.doc
Page 5 of 8
H. LANDSCAPING PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-1102.A)
❑ LANDSCAPE PLAN with the following information(not to exceed 24"x 36"):
All existing and proposed structures;
Names of abutting streets;
Drainage and retention areas including swales,side siopes and bottom elevations;
Delineation and dimensions of all required perimeter landscape buffers;
Sight visibility triangles;
Delineation and dimensions of all parking areas including landscaping isiands and curbing;
Existing trees on-site and immediately adjacent to the site,by species,size and locations,including driplines(as indicated on required
_ tree survey);
Location, size, and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, indicated by a key relating to the plant
schedule;
Plant schedule with a key(symbol or label)indicating the size, description, specifications, quantities, and spacing requirements of all
_ existing and proposed landscape materials,including botanical and common names;
Typical planting details for trees, palms, shrubs and ground cover plants including instructions, soil mixes, backfilling, mulching and
_ protective measures;
Interior landscaping areas hatched and/or shaded and labeled and interior landscape coverage, expressing in both square feet and
_ percentage covered;
Conditions of a previous development approval(e.g.conditions imposed by the Community Development Board);
T Irrigation notes.
❑ REDUCED COLOR LANDSCAPE PLAN to scale(8'/:X 11);
❑ COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM application, as applicable. Landscape associated with the Comprehensive Landscape
Program shall exceed minimum Code requirements to offset the areas where minimum Code will not be met.
I. BUILDING ELEVATION PLAId SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT�: (Section 4-202.A.23)
❑ BUILDING ELEVATION DRAWINGS—with the following information:
All sides of ali buildings
Dimensioned
Colors(provide one full sized set of colored elevations)
Materials
❑ REDUCED BUILDING ELEVATIONS—same as above to scale on 8 YZ X 11
J. SIGNAGE: (Division 19. SIGNS/Section 3-1806) *****NO New signage Proposed At This Time****
❑ All EXISTING freestanding and attached signs; Provide photographs and dimensions (area, height, etc.), indicate whether they will be
removed or to remain.
❑ All PROPOSED freestanding and attached signs; Provide details including location, size, height, colors, materials and drawing;
freestanding signs shall include the street address(numerals)
❑ Comprehensive Sign Program appiication,as applicable(separate appiication and fee required).
❑ Reduced signage proposal(8'/2 X 11) (color),if submitting Comprehensive Sign Program application.
C:\Documents and Settings\derek.ferguson\Desktop\planning dept forms 0708\Comprehensive Infill Project(FLD)2008 07-11.doc
Page 6 c�
.
K. TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY: (Section 4-202.A.13 and 4-801.C)
❑ Include if required by the Traffic Operations Manager or his/her designee or if the propused aevelo�men�:
r
• Will degrade the acceptable level of service for any roadway as adopted in the Comprehensive Plan.
• Will generate 100 or more new vehicle directional trips per hour and/or 1000 or more new vehicle trips per day.
■ Will affect a nearby roadway segment and/or intersection with five(5)reportable accidents within the prior twelve(12)month period or
that is on the City's annual list of most hazardous intersections.
Trip generation shall be based on the most recent edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineer's(ITE)Trip General Manual.
The Traffic Impact Study must be prepared in accordance with a "Scoping Meeting" held with the Traffic Operations Manager and the
Planning DepartmenYs Development Review Manager or their designee(727-562-4750)
Refer to Section 4-801 C of the Community Development Code for exceptions to thiS requirement.
❑ Acknowledgement of traffic impact study requirements(Applicant must initial one of the following):
Traffic Impact Study is i��luded.The study must include a summary table of pre-and post-developmert levels of service for all
roadway legs and each turning movemen+-�all intersections identified in the Scoping Meeting.
HG
Traffic Impact Study is^ot required.
CAUTION — IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A TRAFFIC IMPACT
STUDY AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND
SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR.
If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727)562-
4750.
L. FIRE FLOW CALCULATIONS/WATER STUDY;
Provide Fire Flow Calculations.Water Study by a FIRE PROTECTION ENGINEER to assure an adequate water suppiy is available and to determine if
any upgrades are required by the developer due to the impact of this project. The water supply must be able to support the needs of any required fire
sprinkler, standpipe and/or fire pump. If a fire pump is required the water supply must be able to supply 150%of its rated capacity. Compiiance with
the 2004 Florida Fire Prevention Code to include NFPA 13, MFPA 14, NFPA 20, NFPA 291,and MFPA 1142(Annex H)is required.
❑ Acknowledgement of fire flow calculations/water study requirements(Applicant must initial one of the following):
Fire Flow Calculations/Water Study is included.
HG Fire Flow Calculations/Water Study is not required. (Hydrant Flow Test Provided - Formal Fire Flow Calc
� if Reqd. Will Be Provided Prior To Permitting)
CAUTION — IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A FIRE FLOW
CALCULATIONS/ WATER STUDY AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE
RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR.
If you have questions regarding these requirements,contact the City Fire Prevention Department at(727)562-4334.
M. SIGNATURE:
I,the undersigned,acknowledge that ali representations made STATE OF FLORIDA,COUNTY OF PINELLA�
in this pplication are true and accurate to the best of my Swo.rn to nd s scr be before me this ay of
kno I � ge and authorize City representatives to visit and V� ,A.D.20 to me and/or by
pho �aph the property described in this application. V ,who is personally known has
pro uced �.
__- as identificatio
� /'. (�=�,p' '�
Notary public,
Sign ture of property owner or representative My commission expires: ��,v � ' /�r t,.�
1 I
ZI�Y pV
C:\Documents and Settinys\derek.ferguson\Desktop\planning dept forms 07 G�'b' hell�iy��'��,(�,�„(,�l 2008 07-11.doc
Page 7 of 8 ,�. * M l: Il� �H10�7L
s EXPiRtS:May3,2014
'�iF���t.�O! Banded Thru Budgat Notary SeiMlq�
, � ,
N. AFFIDAVIT TO AUTHORIZE AGENT:
1. Provide names of all property owners on deed-PRINT full names:
Limited Properties, Inc.
_...............................................
2. That(I am/we are)the owner(s)and record title holder(s)of the foltowing described property(address or general location):
2800 Gulf to Bay Blvd. , Clearwater, FL 33759
3. That this property constitutes the property for which a request for a:(describe request)
Comprehensive In-fill Redevelopment Application for the proposed addition to the existing
restaurant.
4. That the undersigned(has/have)appointed and(does/do)appoint:
Northside Engineering Services, Housh Ghovaee, CEO and/or Renee Ruggiero, Senior Project
_.................................................................................................................._.............................................._................_...._..........._......................................................................................................................................................................
Planner
as(histtheir)agent(s)to execute any petitions or other documents necessary to affect such petition;
5. That this affidavit has been executed to induce the City of Clearwater,Florida to consider and act on the above described propeRy;
6. That site visits to the property are ecessary by City representatives in order to process this application and the owner authorizes City
representativ s to visit and pho graph the property described in this application;
7. That(i/we t u e ' d uthority,hereby certify that the foregoing is true and correct.
.�....__...____._.. _..._._.. .----.....----_.._....__...__....__.._�.
. __....---..__._._..__.__..__.._..........__..----....._._._.__.._______.__._..._._..__....____.._._..._.___.__...._.__....
Neil . 'e er perty Owner PresjC&0 PropeRy Owner
Hooters Management Corp.
Property Owner Property Owner
STATE OF FLORIDA,
COUNTY OF PINELLAS
Before me the undersigned,an officer duly commissioned by the laws of the State of Florida,on this __3��� _ day of
(�-c,�re r�.C� , _�L personally appeared (��-�� G, (��.�-`-p � who having been first duly sworn
,_..=.1_ba�
Deposes and says that he/she fully understands the contents of the a�davit that he/she signed.
� -- --� �
�i: '!'�;,: JENNIFER GIOVANNONt• � .
s•� •�; MY COMMISSlON�6E�38528 �
� � EXPIRES Fabruary u4,2015 ----..`_.- �'"_. -"-- ----. _"'``�l�cr`���"����.__._..�_--
%,q!„.�'� Notary ublic Signature
3 -015 FloddallofaryServiCe.com
My Commission Expires: [-21�__ .J ��/ ZOl`J
�_'"_f—
C:1Documents and Settings\derek.ferguson\Desktop\planning dept forms 0708\Comprehensive Infill Project(FLD)2008 07-11.doc
Page 8 of 8
�
i � • +`
�
LETTER OF AUTHORIZATION
This letter will serve as authorization for Housh Ghovaee
(agent Name)
with Northside Enqineerinq Services, Inc. to act as an agent for
Limited Properties, Inc.
�r � (Property Owner's Name)
and to execute any and;all documents related to securing permits and/or
approvals for the construction on the property generally located at
2800 Gulf to Bav, Clearwater, FL. 33759
(Property Location)
PINE AS County, State of FLORIDA.
Neil G. Kiefer
�
Signatu o perty Owner Print Name of Property Owner
Pres./CEO
107 Hampton Rd, Suite 200 Hooters Management Corp.
Address of Property Owner Title
Clearwater, FL 33759 (727) 725-2551
City/State/Zip Code Telephone Number
State of �/a(`,`(ll(;t� The foregoing instrument was acknowledge before me this 3Q�� day
County of +f1 e-l G( of �� � -� , 20�, by �� � G, �i�(��� , as�reS�a(nn,i-���'P�rw� �
who i personally known to m��e',orwho has produced
`' ��: JENNIFER GIOVANNONI identification and who didc�did )take an oath.
�'? MY COMMISSION 1t�E0386��
, EXPIRES February 04,2015 _ - ,
� 36e.o�ss FlorfdeNo �..com ,�, � ; ,� � � ,�,,,� , Notary Public
(Si �ature)
Commission # I:�C�3 S�'�ZR�
(SEAL ABOVE) Tnn:��-e� G=6vannnn, (Name of Notary Typed, Printed or Stamped)
'
�
Planning Department CASE NUMBER:
° 100 South Myrtle Avenue RECEIVED BY(Staff Initials):
� C earwater Clearwater, Florida 33756
Telephone: 727-562-4567 DATE RECEIVED:
� Fax: 727-562-4865
❑ SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION
❑ SUBMIT 14 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION-Plans and
application are required to be collated,stapled and folded into sets
* NOTE: A TOTAL OF 15 SETS OF THIS APPLICATION AND ALL SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION IS REQUIRED TO BE SUBMITTED IN
CONJUNCTION WITH A COMPLETE LEVEL ONE OR LEVEL TWO APPLICATION.
COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM
(Revised 03/29/2006)
�PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT-�-
APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER AND AGER�T INFORM�►"�BO�I: (Cod�Section 4-202.A)
APPLICANT NAME: Llfillt@Cl PPOp@I"tl@S, Inc. c/o Hooters Management Corp.
MAILING ADDRESS: 107 H8mpt011 ROad, Clearwater, FL 33759
PHONE NUMBER: 727-725-2551 CELL NUMBER:
PROPERTY OWNER(S): _Llllllt@d PfO�@I"tleS II1C.
,
List ALL owners on the deed
- ----------------- --.....------------...--....------------------.`—.—�.-------
Nor�nsid� Engineering Services, Inc.
AGENT NAME: _ HOUSh GhOVBt;@, ��O - Renee Ruggiero, Senior Project Planner
MAILING ADDRESS: 300 S. Belcher Road, Clearwater, FL 33765
PHONE NUMBER: 727-443-2869 FAX NUMBER: 727-446-8036
727-235-8475 E-MAIL Renee@northsideengineering.net
CELL NUMBER: ADDRESS:
�. REQUEST: Reduction to the perimeter West landscape buffer along Hamden Rd. from 10' to 1.1' (to
Existing Bldg.), a reduction to the perimeter South landscape buffer along Gulf to Bay Blvd. from 15' to
1.2' (to Existing Bldg.), a reduction to the East perimeter landscape buffer from 5' to 4.1' (to Existing
P'vmt), and a reduction to allow one (1) existing interior landscape island at 147 sq. ft. in lieu of the 150
sq. ft. minimurn required as a Comprehensive Landscape Program.
2. ARCHITECTURAL THEME:
a. The landscaping in a Comprehensive Landscape Program shall be designed as a part of the architectural theme of the principal buildings
proposed or developed on the parcel proposed for the development.
A Florida friendly .Mediterranean theme has been incorporated into the landscape design, offering a
variety of contrasting plant textures,shapes and colors. There are sprawling dark green ground covers
planted in front of light green upright yellow flowering shrubs. Upright variegated yellow & green
dense foliage shrubs planted behind dark green delicate ferns. Fountain like Phoenix Sylvester palms
and Lavender Crepe Myrtles add hei�ht and deeth to the design. _
Y.�12010 AufoCAD Projecfs11G0&-Hooter's CIwlLtrs. &CorreslComp./andscape App w Narrative.8.29.11.doc
Page 1 of 2
OR
b. The design, character, location and/or materials of the landscape treatment proposed in the Comprehensive Landscape Program shall be
demonstrably more attractive than IandscapinG otherwise permitted on the parcel proposed for deVelopment under the minimum landscape
standards.
3. LIGHTING:
Any lighting proposed as a part of a Comprehensive Landscape Program is automatically controlled so that the lighting is turned off when the
business is closed.
Acknowledged, any proposed lighting will be turned off when the business is closed.
4. COMMUNITY CHARACTER:
The landscape treatment proposed in the Comprehensive Landscape Program will enhance the community character of the City of Clearwater.
Ti�� �iiaiu�t�P �� the Cal'i'ii7iiii�fiji, $UP�'OUiiCliii� i��ighbori�oru a�d st���tsaaae witi be yreatfy
enhanced with the installation of over 20 new trees consisting of 5 different varieties in addition to over
2,000 other new plantings. 100% of all available open space will be planted to the fullest extent possible.
5. PROPERTY VALUES:
The landscape treatment proposed in the Comprehensive Landscape Program will have a beneficial impact on the value of the property in the
immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development.
The proposed improvements will have a positive impact on the value of the surrounding properties and
the immediate vicinity. To insure sustainability of th� �nvestment;draught tolerant native plantings make
up the majority of this design. Through sound landscape design,the improvements will be enjoyed
by the community for many years to come.
6. SPECIAL AREA OR SCENIC CORRIDOR PLAN:
The landscape treatment proposed in the Comprehensive Landscape Program is consistent with any special area or scenic corridor plan which
the City of Clearwater has prepared and adopted for the area in which the parcel proposed for development is located.
N/A
THE LANDSCAPING REQUIREMENTS OF ARTICLE 3, DIVISION 12 MAY BE WAIVED OR MODIFIED AS A PART OF A LEVEL ONE OR LEVEL
TWO APPLICATION, AS THE CASE MAY BE, IF THE APPLICATION FOR DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL INCLUDES A COMPREHENSIVE
LANDSCAPE PROGRAM, WHICH SATISFIES THE ABOVE CRITERIA. THE USE OF LANDSCAPE PLANS, SECTIONS / ELEVATIONS,
RENDERINGS AND PERSPECTIVES MAY BE NECESSARY TO SUPPLEMENT THE INFORMATION PROVIDED ON THIS WORKSHEET.
SIGNATURE:
I,the undersigned, acknowledge that all representations made in STATE OF FLORIDA,COUNTY OF PINELLAS
this appli tion are true and accurate to the best of my Sworn_ to ar�d ubscribed before me this�day of
knowle g and authorize City representatives to visit and _����"' ,A.D.20 to me and/or by
photo ra h the property described in this application. k}AU" who is personally known has
produced � .
as identification.
'�r'. -`�, l �p0.Y U C ��M�IW ��
���•.�% q�,���E� �-.r
ign ure of property owne r representative � * MYCOMMISSIOI�t�4�lic,
N,, � EXPIRES:A�'3c�J�nission expires: H,��,J '�J y
"rso �oR`O Bonded Th
Y:12010 AutoCAD Projecfs11006-Hooter's CIwlLfrs. &CorreslComp.landscape App w Narrafive.8.29.11.doc
Page 2 of 2
�-!- �.`� - I`a-c���--.. i� � - ��7 �--� , '
, , _ �'��--��
' :'%, ~ .� _. . . . . , . � .....�....�_.
�' . � •
V: �, ,
: '701.�`"�"18d
�.�, �;��-Y� , � •. � � � o�., 3459 F��875 � � , �
F�b ���;_
�;�i� Pr�ied f�t Lr�an`'�Ide C�ara���F'wed,[hL...dg Flaidn 71�I�Itutrvt»cn[uu prrptrctl byt
� . GU'Y L.KFZV7dEDY,JIt.` . ' d)��-
+� i �, ' , • i�«.�.,..t.. . .
■Lni uA (, S01 S F`I. Birri.e�l�m.� '
WV�L,L Li1�lI� �Y��.(S1ANT�QY fORH—$ECI�ON 6B9.OZ FS� CL1[AIl1VATlE$ FLOQIDA laSlf , .. '
iII e�.�tt�rnlure s` �i.a�chu � ""� an or - -�. . ._...._.._._..-- •---
�1 ., r December . i�JO , �trlarrrn
��WA�EN L. �F�N..and �ET2aA Y._GEEEH.'..�1�,.@_ +��e •. . .
ot�hr Councy of • � pitYellae . ,5Gte of__ �'joX�dB'. � .granlar•,and
. LINI'TESI P,AUPFRTIES, �G., a,�Io`riaa corgora�'iou;---------�—'----'�� .-___._...
whrnr�m�.otBcr .ddrea I, 31�i South fiiesouri.•Ave., 'S�ite 3�2 ' •
; Clenrwater. Florida 33516
uf�hr Counry.of � Piaellas �SIY�C of Plorida • • � ,gnntre•, '.
' �ItlllBBtl�, �y�sald grnntor, (or und (n ronsideratiot�qf lhe sum nf, • _ , . .
- - -- � - - - - - = - -- Other valuable coneideratione as�d '1'EN -' p„►L•h,
and othrr go«]��xl�xlur6k cvnsidmtin�u to uld g+nfor D�hand pald 6y sx(d grantee,the recrlpt whnro(Is hrreb)' •
LC'Ift11M'IR�$C(I, h� grinted, bargaiRccl end iold 1o'the saJd .ntee,m�d granters hc{n nnd asslgi4 forct•er. the fvl-
ra
lowing dcstriTxd Li�d, sihi�fr, lying and berng In. pj,p@ LA9 . Cotinty,'Fbrid� to-wiL• . •
i
' The'i5outh�330 fer_t oP the-peet 130-feet oF CI7N—SOLLC}11iQ9t � '
1 5 I�T Z I �.�ter (SW�) of the Northeaet Quarter (NE�J o�' Section � � s
IIIIkiIlFt�o(fJ' 17� �Townehip 29 :iauth, Ran,ge 16 Eaet, Ptnellae Countp, ��, ' i3• .
NP a r,_.�� Florida, LESS Atil) S7CCEE'T the right of way for Cot�f.y Road c�;;� --
�- ���i;[D Num�er 144, a/k/n Hamp[on Enad, ovet approximatedy the a LJ
� �m—{ Nes� 30 feet thereof, and the righE� of way for Star_e Road ��s: . �,
• v }��Tl ��er 60, a/k/a i�1F-to-Hay $oulevard� �over apprqximaCelp�p�. � ,
�p �the•�South 5U feet thereof� . „��' s_ �
c '"� _ ; •— �°---���
.,, ' � Alsc�.Rnown As 2BQ0 Gul��to-Bay�Boulevard, Cleaiwatr_r, Plor daf , •„_ _
;� �,r . �.� �
= - -^' DO Suhj;ect to Restric'tions and Hasements of Record. . '
�. � _ . . . '
o � n� � . .
-o XD J . ,
� .�Hl �:+Id grantor doyy hrrrby Fully wurxol Uu title ta:lld laiid,+�nd u911,defend thr satne agalnst the l�a�ful clxlrn�
' nf uIl personsµ-ha'��°�'er., • ,
. T"Crintor a�d`grantec sre used for singular or plura� rs contcxt rcyu(ra. '
, . � .
. �Il itqr�vs 3�t�xreaf, ,Grantor hu bcrrunto ut grinta'y hand and seal the d�y a yca{6rst AI)O'FLµTillCU. __
gr
Stgn scaled�nd v ''wr ' . � /� _
- �`---,--`-+' ,. . .��F1�A1�� � k ���(Fi"Ii .� '
..------- •
�v • , — (Seil)
' � . , �J , � , ' , . '
� , • . i • ' � :v-" " . .
--- t . (Sri1)
" STA7E U FLUR73�A . . �- • .
Co u rrr�r o F P INELT�IS .. � ' . , �
I NEftERY CERTIFI' t}ut on thls d�y bcfore mr, �n o�cir duly c�uallC�ed fo hke �ckiwwled�ment�, percomlly
�PP«r�d i�ARREti t,. GKEEN and VEIW� 31'. GREEN, Liie Wife, • . .
• to mc�mqz�'to br�hc ptra�+s descn'bed in'+��d who c:ecuted the (nregotng instrument nnd'acknawled�qnl bc{ore �
mr Uiat Uic�y cacevtrd the sune� .. . •- • ,
1V1'I7v��r�lypandidnd officlal ual in the Ga�nty and SCrtr tu+ �td�7,1, , y;o( cember :
!9�0•:�... . , r .. . ' _ . " .
:�., , � . .�
��i%�cl�mis�sF�ki�rai . . . . ° _ PuhNc ' .
2 ; C 'i �'
� . J�r��1.ITi._di`_.fl.OL�.I.{T U�tt . .. .. . .. . ..... . _ . ..... ' ' — ,
Fj7ut�DE{. RP, 19]
�P�.w.w�.,+ n.,ti�..,._..0 11l1f�1166EHTA$Y^-
, ., �',�; , .. o DOCUMENTAR ;____��
� �� .�� �''���;e�"` ' « : S U R TAX= [Ti�T1�7C=
1 � �NNM+..` �€ ,' ?Y _ � . - FLORI A � � �A , �, . . .
'; � �� " �Y x���-� 0 I. 0 0 _ 3 T. 5�U _ :.
'r- r.�. �
� o n�t! . . ,
. . �•�'
. . . f _ . . . . .......................... .. .. .... ........ ... .. .. �.�
_ . � � • �. • '*'� -:3'�. - .��"$�':' '`;%- a�.. . . •w��.•� - '..-..:
..- s 1: . .. •'�'i'{?1•;.n'.:�..'y' �l,�y
.ci,��� .
I
f .
+
�
1 - -
� , `_
, • . _ . .. . . - .�:., v7t l.�.... � _ ..
..T ,. . .. . . �1' " . .. , ' ..... � . . .. ' � . �
��.�..`,. , .. . ' . ' , ' , �
��tr nf�iIIr�d� t � ,
a[nuutn cE Pinellas f ���•��5�racE 218 3 �
�
.,;- � �rrrbg QSertlfy T�tRr,o», fh.es 31st daU of October,
�
-;� i .9. D: >386, before »�e per:vou.oll7� appearcd
c:�j, ; i SUE M. UAVISTON, an unremarried ,widow,
��;'�� t.o me I���oiu�a to be t,lee persorL cdescribed i�t an.d :u1to e.toorated• Clae fore�toirt.Q
"1: co�t•UCUunce to —
� LIMITED PROPERTiES, TNC., a Florfda corporation,
_,.. aaacl severall� ac1�u•owledee�l
tlee exacritia�i t.h.ereo/' to be her J'ree o.et a�rJ deed. jor Eh.e �ases nrr.�l hicn��n,sea '
tlier ntentco�ce�l; ,:",.. .;; �...
�es �' nr.�si}n.dticre a.ucl o/jl.ci.ad scat at Clearwater : 1�:,: : �..:•- .
irt. t.hR Cott.�r.t�/ oj Pinellas nud State oj�lora�da;•1�se fl�.� a��d". . �
. Jear lasf uforesa.id. '� •(�'ehl);;
MY��ary Pu61ir,Stalo of F1ori�y .�� ,�! ,`� '
. . � �. _ mmiubn Expires rie6.l4,1ggQ Ll� - . �J 1.�' :
• �M' Comm�ssion Ex ares ,� .• '�
, � . U P� utarr,/P lr.o j•.,•.. ;
�.�;��„�•�• �
�
. � ,
! 'z�
LEGl1L DCSCRI f+TION . '
i
PJIRCEL A ` � i �
ltegin fron the aenter of 5ealion 17, Township 29 SouLh, Range 16 -
Last,, Pi��ellas Counky, Florida, and sun thence alonq Che N/S i , '
centerline o! suid settion, �lsa the R/W centerline of Hampton � ; ,
Road, N Od'20'17" M, 720.•00 feetf thence N 84•46'Ol" E, 25.00 •
feet, to e point along the eastesly R/W line of seid Hampton Road
for P.O.B.; tbe�cc zun N 89'�6'Ol"E,105.00 feet; thence N � �
� 00"20'13" w, 15.00 feet; thence S 89•�6'O1" W, 105.00 feet,te � , . ,
•aid easterly R/W line of Hampton Rcad; thenee along said R/A' , '
� line S 00•20'13" h, �15.00 feet to the Pofnt of Bec�inning, j �
eontaining 1,575 square feet, I ,
- I
'I
rArcc£L a ' �
�
I Begin from the center of Section 17, Township 29 South, Range 16
� Ast, Pinellas County, Florida, and run Ehence along the N/5 � ,
� centezline of said seetion, aiao the R/w centerline of Hampton
� Road� N 00'20'13" W� 735.D0 feet; �thence N 69'66'O1"—E-��30.00
feet for a P.o.s.; thence continne N 89•46'O1" F,� 10.00 feet:
� thcnce S 00•20'13" E, 131.85 feet to a peint on the north line '
,� of Parcel C; thenee N 89•57'26.9" W, along the north line of ; .
Parcel C, 10.0 feet; thence N 00•20'13' N, 1a1.85 feet to the �--
'��. ?.C.B., ao�ta8zing 1�3le S!i''LL�1'H fept. ' ��
; r
'� ?ARCEL C :
7'he East Y00 feet uf the West 230 feet, less the North 730 `.eet �� � �
�;� ' ihereof, af the SW h of the NE k of Section 17, Tovnship 29 5,
,'t,ange 1G E, less Gulf-to-eay 81vd. right-of-way, containing
55,315 sryuare feet.
..
. , .
, ,�;
.::
4.,.
�.,,�� . . . ' L .
u'�
'� �� EXHIBIT A _
�, � ��.- �,�.. ,
� � � , '� .
I �- e�
n `�;,�'.• I
.
� . . .,., . , ,. ,
: . . . .
� � . .
:
.:
..:::t.. .� ..... :.R . ' . . , • `
�. ........., ._
�:�..i.:..,.. i... . . '• . � .. . . . .
I .. .... � . . .. \\ . ; � .
���' ' . � .a..ay� � � .
����� �� �FORAt IISS ROpIDA•WARMNTY DEGD l =- '�n r � TuT�LANN w.vrewm v...wr.o..w� �
:.•. �re ca,m.„�> $(7�.+J 5'b V J ,.,.,.�.,,..�.,,..,�...�...�.._.�....
���'--" rnPs O.A,6 3 5�Fb��218 2 �
�,��H,pp � ♦ a � � � ;
::�:,�' t ltg ����ltl � ' �
:� �: � � �
"�" ' JJtade tlti,s 31st October �
; :� I� m , daU oj ✓1.D.Y9 86� :
���}i ; 7mP#ll1$�ll SUE M. DAVISTON, an unremarried widow, � "`
., �;
;; '� ;'
.:,�
` �' of th.o Coic�rt o PinelYas �
�/ f �nd Stato of Florida,
j; part y of t1t.oJlrst part,¢n.d LIMITEU PROPERTIES, INC., i i
I P:O: Box 4946, Clearwater, FL 33518, .
-j a corporatio�c esisti,�z�s uauler the lnres oj t.]ca SLaCe of Florida , '
laavi�r.� ita >>ri�tei•pal placc oj littsiu.esa i.:a Glae Cort.�r•t� of Pinellas� a�acl I
� � State oj Florida parly of tlae aecon�l parC,
�Ctt[pS��t�. CTcat t7ta saicl part y a/'ilae n•rst��arC,fa�a�td.in.con.erderu.Li.o�t I
o/' tlao BII•T)L of other good and valuable consideration and Ten Doddars,. ; , �
to her i��. ha.�rrl. pai�l, Uce reeci.��/ 7oh.erenf 7:a h.ereb�� aeknorulerdgr.d•, Jias i ,
d�•antecl, bareur.�r.ed., soltl; allertc<7, ren�i.verl., rc%r�rsed, e�i.feo/)'e�l, r,on.vc�ecl anrl• co�t-
. ltrnaed ¢x.rl b� Llaese prexe�ala do�s rrrrn.t, litrr6�r.u., sell, al•ien•, rent.r.ve, releuso, I
c�rfco/J',co�i.ve�ir�rcl. co»JErnr. u�id.o Ll�e eaiJ part•U o/'ilae seca�d pnrt a_rr.td iL:c sx.eces-
. sors aixcl assig».s /o,euer, udl (IaJC r.erEai�a r�nrcel. vf laiarl lr�iiab a�id. Le+�xD i�t tlic '
Cotuat� of Pinell.as a�+.d. Stale of Tlnyicict, nxore parLde:�larl� � .
described as fullorus: i
S , �
, < q See Attached Exhibit A. � �= �
r"' Im�
� � `� Subject to restrictions and easements of record and`..�a� � I : �
m° � for 1967 and subsequent years. I �
� ►+ F � � un '��;' riT -
� m < a Together with and including all of the Grantor s rig�t,:':; � j
a� d tit le an d in terest un der A G R E E M E N T F O R E X C H A N G� O F �_ ^c ' ' / '
� � �� �y � ACCESS RIGHx5-OF-WAY, dated and recorded 8/30/84, i� ?'^ '� j + �
U � OR Book 5832, Page 2133, of the Publid Records of c� ;'::� £ ' �
h � o Pinellas County, Florida. ' i '
__ - �N � K !,
H c
. � �" � m oi Cas 11 Ch � ��`-�• �� 15 I56369�3� �40 1.9.OQi Eb r 1 ' ,
� ra.: .r..... . .
9 � QO Re Dqcumant�N�'� � �..�� Y�r �'�� 41 lr 125.00
� d at d;�' o a . �„M.,.. ; .
y s...... ....:�a�,r,�ci,.A n����
•.+�O:"'�r TDTAL 1r234.U0
0 43 !n� t;adt,`i•�y.D" � �vmdr C�r:': i
� R7 *Q //Ir��� .-n.... �
� N Tnl�. /C7��
. {; ° ,o�� •
.�� �� �ugttl�rr zviGl+, aZl Clta tr,rl.en't.c�t ls, Tic��erlil�nrcrxts a�acl npprr.rt.e�eaar.ces, i�itTt r ; ,/t'`"
� • � eaer�privr.leae,ri�lzt, ttf.l.c,iraterest nit.il�.slctic,doir,er o��rl rr?Jr.(,r�/'rlvtver, reucrs�ioia, � i ,
�i a rent.ain�ier a�zd easonxent GI1.ereGa bela�yi.»e or i•ia u�i.f�rui1e nj���erlar»in•�: �
°"�"5�, i � �
I
(�11 �F11tC Ellt�1 �it �p!!,I f.Ite s�rnac i�l•fee silrt•ple foreuer. ,
✓bad tlac eatd part y o/ elac Jtrst piarG rXves coverrau.t ruiGla �lr.e sui�l >>rarLJ o/ � ,
- LTee �seeo�z�l p¢rt ticat she as laiu/u!!��ser.�ecl o/'Glae saicl•��renir.ses, lh.caG ilceu are ,..._ �
� • /'ree of all i.rce:inzbraa�.ee, u�icl tltaC she has �rood ri.�Ir.l u�+cl duw/tr.d au.Lk.ori.CU "
to sell Clte s¢n1.e;antl tltat saicl part y o/' t.Tte Jlrs%parl.�IoClc li.cr�Lr�f�cT.l.r�warra�r.0
tlze tiEle t.n saicl la�r.�l, u�a�l Tuill cl.c/'errd l.Tac sanr.e abui��.st tlae lraru/'rcl clainxs of all •
!`� ? perso�ts wlto»zaoct�er.
G ,�lt ��ttlP�.6 �[�pYPil�, t.l�e ,vnicl port.y nj lTae JI�:sG >>arC 1an•s Jaererc�zto
` � set he= Tza�atl a�:d seaG tlae dttU aitv Jcar aLoua rurilLe�z.
� ! Sigrteei,8caled nnd Delivered in Our Preeencc: �
. �
'• � ,�,�
� .v,���J, t� �1 � �
�; SUE M. DAVISTON
� , —
:.�. �
•1. � J C�y
;i l./�
2
LEGAL DESCRIPT/ON
LEGAL DESCR/PT/ON
(PER OFFIC/AL RECORDS BC��I��3�'0, PAGES 2182 Al1f�2'83) :
PARCEL A
BEG/N Ff?C,li�1 TME CENTER OF SECT/ON 17, TOWNSH/P 29 SOUTH,
f?ANGE 16 EAST,P/NELLAS COUNTY, FLOR/DA,AND RUN THENCE
ALONG THE N/S CENTERL/NE OF SA/D SECT/ON, ALSO THE R/W
CENTERLINE OF HAMPTON ROAD, N 00°20'93"W, 720.00 FEET,• THENCE
N 89°46'01"E, 25.00 FEET, TO A PO/NT ALONG THE EASTERL Y R/W LINE.
OF SAID HAMPTOIOI ROAD FOR P.O.B.; THENCE R11�'1/N 83°46'09"E,
105.00 FEET,• THENCE N 00°20'13"W, 15 00 FEET,• THENCE S 89°46'01"W,
105.00 FEET, TO SAID EASTERL Y R/W LINE OF HAMPTON ROAD;
THENCE AL ONG SA/D R/W LINE S 00°20'13" W, �5.00 FEET TO THE
POINT OF BEG/NN/NG, CONTA/N/NG 1,575 SQUARE FEET.
PARCEL B
BEG/N FROM THE CENTER OF SECT/ON �7, TOWNSH/P 29 SOUTH,
RANGE 16 EAST, P/NELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA, AND RUN THENCE
ALONG THE N/S CENTERL/NE OF SA/D SECT/ON, ALSO THE R/W
CENTERUNE OF HAMPTON ROAD, N 00°20'13" W, 735.00 FEET; THENCE
N 89°46'01"E, 930.00 FEET FOR A P.O.B.; THENCE CONT/NUE N 89°46'01"
E, �0.00 FEET,• THENCE S 00°20'�3"E, 13�.85 FEET TO A POINT ON THE
NORTH LINE OF PARCEL C; THENCE N 89°5726.9" W, ALONG THE
NORTH LINE OFPARCEL C, 90.0 FEET,• THENCE N 00°20'�3" W, 139.85
FEET TO THE P.O.B., CONTA/N/NG 1,318 SQUARE FEET.
PARCEL C
THE EAST �00 FEET OF THE WEST 230 FEET, LESS THE NORTH 730
FEET THEREOF, OF THE 51�19/4 OF THE NE 1/4 OF SECTION 97,
TOWNSHIP 29 S., RANGE 16 E, LcSS �11�F TC�-BAY BL!/,D.
R/GHT-OF-WAY, CONTA/N/NG 55,315 SQUARE FEET.
f
�
� LEGAL DESCR/PT/OISi (PER OFFIC/AL RECORDS BOOK 3459, PAGE 87�
s"
� THE SOUTH 330 FEET OF THE WEST 130 FEET OF THE SOUTHWEST
� QUARTER (SW 1/4J OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER (NE 1/4J OF
$ SECTION 97, TOWNSH/P 29 SOUTH, RANGE �6 EAST, PINELLAS
� COUNTY, FLOR/D�1, L��,S AM,Q�XCEPT TO�E R/GHT OF WAY FOR
= COUNTY ROAD NUIVIBEfZ a��,A/K/•4 HAMPTON ROAD, �VER
� APPROX/MATELY THE WEST 30 FEET THEREOF, AAIa THE R/GHT OF
� WAYFOR STATE ROAD NUMBER 60, A/K/A GULF-TO-BAYBOULEVARD,
� OVER APPROX/MATEL Y THE SOUTH 50 FEET THEREOF.
8 (LABELED AS "PARCEL D"ON THE DRAWING ABOVE)
�
� THE ENT/RE PARCEL CONTAINS 1.93 ACRES, MORE OR LESS.
0
�
a
0
IV
� 368/17/2011 �7:47 7275624961 PUBLIC UTILITIES PAGE 02
' , >�i��s
�'� '� �'`�
N� � °C'�
FLt�W 7�5�`
CITY Cf�CLEAl2WA'1rER
WATER DEPARTMENT
LtxGATi�N "'Y �7C� 'C"C"� a
bATE Q�TEST L � �
STATIC: PSi r V �
RESIQUAL PSI 4..J � � �
PITOT F'SI ���LL � °�Q
�r�d �'tl �- � .
FLOW GPM � � ��U �� ��
l��� C ra� / �. .
HYbRANT# �
Ca�tlD# �
��w�`�i: / �^-'k./ J � `' �� � r �
��./��� � �� � '^'�+l " • '`� ! � �� ■ ��
,rJ �
CUSTQrUlEI��EQU�$TING TE3T
' 08/17/2611 �7: 47 7275624961 PUBLIC UTILITIES PAGE 03
. L vlty u� Page 9
. . Cf;��rwater Aug 92,20��/95.�32
Hydrazxt Test Sezvice Oy-d�r •
..... ..__..._. -_........-----._..
��II� _......-----..... . ..
I ��242�86 Ac�CiO;C� Code: FI��'ST .Created By:cr�z�i.,cox`�.. ,nu$-i2=�-r �s:3o��
.
i.. __. _........ . * , 7 z 4 2 B � �. -Effcctive_Da.te:Au�-15-201_1 ___._. ._._.__. ...._—. ....----.... ...i
.. ..... _ .....
Dist.ribution: 'VYATER
C.,�tisto�ner: 2125936 NOR ...__ ........,.. . _.__.._...... ......_.._._.. __.._._.... ............_.._ ..—_.. ...__.._... ...._.....
THSIDF�NGINEF,RING
Pl�.otie nun�l�ex•(s): BiJS 727-443-28G9 Ext.DORE.F..N
P.iaone n.umbez s : BUS 727-44G-8036 fax
. ....._...----.. ......__U_....... ....-------.... ------ ...---- .....------._..... -----... ...------ --�--- —.—_. ..
_.. ...._..._.�
� elccotml: 4.18y 045 1VQ.R'�'HStDF.�NCI.1vE,F,,RTNG
_..nr�a;
. __._ 1
Cnmmenc: Hydi�ant�}i0 on we.r[.ri�/e ofHanr�[o,r near Nq��tla}i�est cnrn�r of Gtt1f tn I�c�y arrd Hantpton 727-235�8475 RGr�ee Rug�iero o�ae fayeraitt t�st
l� � �"�� ��
� �
l� l �r ��
� �
�
�- C C,� ►�
1 .7 �""
,� � r � 1
� --
�
Civil
Lancl f'larining
C�c.a�: �iligence Re�orts
' `' - Re-Zaning,Laiid Use,Annexatian
.:,.. _; . ._
�;� , �� r �
� ��i��:dt��:��9xr;� , �t������€'a?, ��,����'� St:c�rmwatei• Management
Utility Design
EXHIB[T "�'! Traffic
TO FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION FOR C=��nstruccioii Adrninistration I
COMPREHENSIVE INFILL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT
2800 Gulf to Bay T�3�ulevard I
_ �
Section B. Description of Request
The Applicant Hooters Management Corporation proposes improvements to the existing
restaurant structure and site through the Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment process.
The site is an aggregate of 1.93 acres bounded on the west by Hampton Road and the
south by Gulf to Bay Boulevard; an office development is located to the north of the site
- = and a restaurant operation to the east. !
�
Specifically, the Applicant requests flexible development approval to allow a 2,138 sq. ft.
- expansion to the existing restaurant for a total of 7,134 gross sq. ft. with:
a. a Lot Area of 84,066 square feet;
— b. a Lot Width of 255 feet on Hampton Road and 185.01 feet on Gulf to Bay
— Boulevard;
c. a Height of 21'7"to mid-point of roof and 15'8"to top of parapet;
= d. a Front(west) Setback along Hampton Road of 1.1' to existing building, and
4.2' to parking lot pavement;
e. a Front (south) s���ack alon� �utf to Bay Boulevard of 1.2' to the existing
,._.__. __;
building,3'6"for the proposed addition and 15' to parking lot pavement;
f. a Side (east) setback of 114.30'to the proposed addition and 3.3' to the
�arking lot pavemerit;
g. a Side (north) setback of 157.8' to the proposed addition and 0' to the
parking lot pavement;
h. an Imp�rvious Sui-�fao��R.atio of 0.70 �
i. F.A.R. of 0.08
j. Providing 107 On-Site Parking Spaces
k. Flexibility to the minimunl standards for Sight Visibility Triangles associated
with the existing building at the intersection of Hampton Road and Gulf to
Bay and in association with a portion of the attached outdoor dinning area
roof along the west side of the driveway adjacent to Gulf to Bay;
300 South Belclier- fZo7rl
Clearwater,Hloi•i�la 337bri 1
ter.h c�northsidee>n�ine�:rii7f;s�.�t-vi<:�s.con�
727 443 2�359 Fax 727�<iG £3�3fi
as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of
Section 2-704.0 of the Development Code including approval of a Comprehensive
Landscape Program Application.
History
The site is the home of the "Or'ig'ihal" �3ooters`Restaurant, established in 1983. The
structure built in 1946, is a local landmark housing the location that began the successful
worldwide chain of restaurants now c.onsisting of over 400 locations, in 44 States and 25
Countries. - ,„ ' , ,,, ,
When Hooters began operation 28 years ago, the restaurant was well served by the
existing 4,996 square foot building. Times and equipment have changed and to remain
competitive in �he �conomy and local market, upgrades to the building, kitchen and site
are necessary to meet current resfaura�t-,sta�nciards and expectations of patrons. This re-
development plan will allow Hooters Restaurani to continue as an economic contributor
within the community and help to insure longevity of the local business.
Maintaining the existing character of the structure and site is important to the owners; in
an effort to stay true to history, the site, building and business will remain much the same
as it is today. Much of the well known existing structure will remain in place, allowing
the local landmark to maintain its place in Hooters history with the new addition
providing a nice update to the entrance.
This location remains under much the same ownership as the original restaurant and will
continue to provide the same high standard of operation and community involvement as
in the past 28 years.
Proposed
The Applicant is seeking re-development approval to allow an addition to the existing
restaurant with associated site modifications including new outdoor seating areas and
upgrades to site landscaping. The proposal includes interior renovation of the existing
structure to update the kitchen, preparation and wait staff areas and restroom facilities,
addressing the need to upgrade and expand back of house facilities. The proposal also
offers new seating areas with a.nie��'�pda��.�a�tl�e'building entranee:. The second floor of
the existing structure will con�inue ta be utilized as storage space with desk area for the
on duty manager; the second:floor,ar:�a will not be enlarged. A complete upgrade to site
landscapin� has been provided within this proposal, offering a professional designed
landscape plan to enhance the site and the street appeal of the development.
As otirtlined below, the proposed re-development plan and associated improvements
meet the Geriera� i4��licability Criteria and the Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment
Project Criteria of the Land I��wel�pr�.ent Code; the proposed improvements are
appropriate in scale and intensity for, this c�mmerciall� designated corridor and
surrounding mixture of uses. The proposed improvem�'rits will reflect positively on the
value of land and will allow for the continuation of an economic contributor and
enlployer within our community.
2
, ' Section D. Written Submittal Requirements (3-913.A)
General /�p�tic�b�litv Criteria:
1) The proposed development of the land will �Se in harmony with the scale,
bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is
located.
Through appropriate architectural and site design, the proposed re-development
will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, intensity and character of the
adjacent properties. The proposed single story expansion is similar in scale and
character of the adj acent and surrounding sites; the addition will offer a fresh
appearance to the building entrance and will be harmonious with the existing
structure.
The basic site lay out will not change with this proposal, pavement setbacks are
primarily unchanged; the healthy and non-hazardous trees will remain, the
character of the site will remain much the same as it is today only improved.
The existing structure, built in 1946, either predates or equals the construction date
of many of the surrounding structures; the building has been a part of the built
environment for many years and is in harmony �.�ith the bulk, coverage, density
character of the surrounding properties. The area, comprised of an array of various
building types and uses p�c$,r�cl���q p���i�ular emerging ch�racter.
2) The proposed developmen# will not hinder or discourage the appropriate
d�v�lap�ment and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair
the value thereof.
�� The proposed re-development and continuation of this successful restaurant
operation will noi h�nder or discourage development and use of adjacent land and
buildings, the restaurant use is appra�riate and compaiible with the similar
adjacent commercial uses of retail; au�ce ana -restaurant.
The proposed upgrades to the building and site will not hinder appropriate
development and may encourage new development and re-development of
adjacent land, providing a positive effect on the property values of the surrounding
land.
Some of the many improvements proposed to the building and site include:
• A new eastern fa�ade and entrance, including new outdoor dining areas.
• Upgrades to patron areas including indoor seating areas and restroom
facilities.
3
�.;, :a, .
I
• Improved safety associated with pedestrian and vehicular circulation
through the addition of pedestrian walkways, and restricted ingress and
egress along Gulf to Bay Blvd. where previously un-restricted.
� • New professionally designed landscaping will be present within all
available yards. New plantings will be installed along the parking area
adjacent to Gulf to Bay Blvd. The east and west side yards will receive
landscape treatment to the fullest extent possible taking into consideration
the existing building location and the presence of many trees along the side
yards. All islands within the older parlcing lot will receive new landscape
materials, offerin�`�ie�a�atAful ize�v"upgrades to the site.
�
The items outlined ahove �nly touch on the more than $550,000.00 worth of
improvements proposed far this site; the proposed improvements will aide and
support the value of surrounding lands and buildings. The proposed re-
development will help to encourage commercial development and re-development
.. along this commercial corridor.
..,....
3) The proposed �+edelopme�t�ill not adversely affect the.h��lth or safety of
persons residing orworking in th� a�ei�hb�rhorrd o�'the proposed use.
The proposed re-development will have positive effects on the health and safety of
area residents and workers; safety will be improved in association with pedestrian
and vehicular circulation through the addition of pedestrian walkways, and
restricted ingress and egress along Gulf to Bay Blvd. where previously un-
restricted.
Through proven and continued responsible business management and operation
the health and safety of persons residing and/or working in the neighborhood will
not be adversely affected. The business provides reasonable hours of operation;
the site is located within a commercially designated area and offers appropriate
and responsible stormwater management, trash disposal and access.
4) The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion.
As a part of this re-development proposal improvements will be made to
minimize traffic congestion through the addition of restricted ingress and egress
to and from Gulf to Bay Blvd. A new divider median is proposed at the entrance
along Gulf to Bay Blvd. to deter east bounc� traffic from using the Gulf to Bay
���,,r.�,.
entrance. The new divid��ar��,ia{�.will �lso discourage left.turns onto Gulf to Bay
when leaving the site; both actions can safely and easily be accomplished through
utilization of the Hampton Road driveway.
The proposed addition will ribt degrade the level of service of the roadway, will
not generate 100 or more new vehicular trips per hour and/or 1,000 per day and
will not negatively affect the nearby roadway.
4
t +?'l:' . , .... � �r:
5) The proposed developmen�t is consistent with the community character of
the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development.
The proposed re-development will be consistent with the bulk, scale, use and
intensity of the vicinity; the_proposed is consistent with the character of the
immediate vicinity. The Hooters Resta�rant is a lor� �tanding component of the
vicinity and neighborhood.
6) The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects,
including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts on
adjacent properties.
The proposed re-development will not cause adverse effects on adjacent
properties, through sound site design, improvements to access, appropriate trash
disposal and hours of operation the nronosal minimizes aclv�rse effects on acijacent
properties.
Written Submittal Requirements
Comprehensive infill Redevelopment Proiect Criteria:
1. The development or redevelopment is otherwise impractical without
deviations from the use and9or development standards set forth in this
zoning district. ` � '�- "
The proposed deviatians from Code are the minimum necessary to make practical
use of this existing building and existing site improvements. Certain deviations
ar"e necessary due to existing site conditions and/or were not self created by the
Applicant; the double frontage lot, the location of the existing building and
location of the existing trees all play a part in the hardships associated with re-
developi�ent-af.the_site. Re-development would be impractical without the
requested deviations. - "
Setbacks
Relief sought for the building setbacks are the minimum necessary to
accommodate the existing building and the proposed addition. The addition has
been pushed back along the south to insure no portion of the addition projects
beyond the southern property boundary. The remaining setback deviations are
associated with pavement and are minimal and similar to the existing conditions
and the conditions on many of the surrounding sites. A small portion of the
existing building at the southwest corner of the site is located at 0.20' beyond the
property line and has been an existing condition since the ROW expansion took
place and will remain.
5
Parking
The site provides the 107 required parking spaces on site; approporiate parking
has been provided for the restaurant.
Si�ht Visibilitv Triangles
A request for flexibility with regard to the sight visibility triangle at the
intersection of Hampton Road and Gulf to Bay Blvd is necessary to address the
existing building location and to allow a small portion of the shade structure
associated with the new attached outdoor dining area, along the west side of the
driveway adjacent to Gulf to Bay Blvd. The shade structure will not create an
unsafe condition associatec�, with vi�ibility as the structure will not impede
visibility of pedestrians along the sidewalk nor vehicles traveling east ciown Gulf
to Bay as no left turn wi11 be permitted at this driveway.
2. `��� +��vefopment or redevelopment will be consistent with the goals and
policies of the Comprehensive Plan, as well as with the general purpose,
intent and basic planning objectives of this Code, and with the intent and
�urpose of this zoning district.
The re-development proposal, vviYi the reguested approE�at as a Comprehensive
In-Fill Project, is consistent witr. many ai �he goals and policies within the �
Comprehensive Plan, especially in association with urban conservation and
renewal, business retention and sharing of facilities such as access and parking.
Restaurant uses are permissible uses within the "Commercial" zoning district and
within the "Commercial General" land use category.
3. The development or redevelopment will not impede the normal and orderly
development and improvement of surrounding properties.
The proposed project is compatible with the neighborhood, as is more particularly
discussed in General Applicability Criteria 1 and 2 together with Comprehensive
Infill Criteria 4 below, will not impede other development. The proposed re-
development project with the associated improvements will benefit the
surrounding properties and the community as a whole.
4. Adjoining properties will not suffer substantial detriment as a result of the
proposed development.
_ ;� ,
Adjoining properties v�iill not��suffer substantial detriment as a��res�zlt of this
proposal; Restaurant za.ses are allowable within the Commercial District and are
well esiablished v�ithin the nei�hborhood and on this site. The proposal includes
�nany upgrades such as improvements to the site landscaping, improvement to
pedestrian and vehicular movements and access, improving the safety of
pedestrians and motorist. Please see General Applicability Criteria 2 for additional
discuss��r_�re�arding this item.
�
5. The proposed use shai� othE��v✓�s� be permitted by the undEr!ying future land
use category, be com��atible with adjacent land uses, will not su�sta�ntially
alter the essentiaN �►.�e Gh�racteristics of the neighborhood; and shall
demor.strate c�!�piiance with one or more of the following objectives:
a. The proposed use is permitted in this zoning district as a
minimum standard, flexible standard or flexible development
use;
b. The propos�� use �ould be a significant economic
contributor to the C�ty`s ecot�omic base by diversifying the
local economy or by creating jobs;
c. The development proposal accommodates the expansion or
redevelopment of an existing economic contributor;
d. The proposed use provides for the provision of affordable
housing;
e. The proposed use provides for development or
redevelopment in an area that is characterized by other
similar development and where a land use plan amendment
and rezoning would result in a spot land use or zoning
designation; or
f. The proposed use provides for the development of a new,
and/or preservation of a working waterfront use.
Restaurant uses are permitted by the "Commercial General" land use category and
in the "Commercial" zoning district as a minimum standard, flexible standard and
flexible use. The existing restaurant use �nci proposed improvements are
compatible with the surroi��.e�:ia?g:: u-ses and character "of the neighborhood as
previously discussed in�General Applicability Criteria l.
The H�oters Restaurant.is a -lqcal economic contributor and employer, with many
o�her contributions to the community through sponsorship.
6. FlexibilitS�=�A�ith regard to use, lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street
parking are justifi�d b���d on demonstrated compliance wyth all of the
following design object�ves:
a. The proposed development will not impede the normal and orderly
development and improvement of the surrounding properties for
uses permitted in this zoning district.
The restaurant use is permitted in the Commercial zoning district and as previously
discussed in General Applicability Criteria 1, the proposed re-development will not
impede development of surrounding properties; the proposed improvements may help
to stimulate additional business activity in the area and encourage redevelopment of
surrounding sites.
7
b. The proposed development complies with applicable design
guidelines adopted by the City.
No design guidelines are applicable to this area.
c. The design, scale and intensity of the proposed development
supports the established or emerging character of�n area;
The proposed improvements are supported by the character of the neighborhood, the
surrounding retail, restaurant and office developments are similar in design, scale
and intensity, please see General Applicability Criteria #4 for additional discussion
of compatibility with the neighborhood.
d. In order to form a cohesive, visually interesting and attractive
appearance, the proposed development incorporates a suf�stantial
number of the followinq design elements:
• Changes in horizontal building�plan�s;
• Use of archift��9�axal,:W,>ci�tails- such as �ofumns, cornices,
stringcourses, pilasters, porticos, balconies, railings,- �wnings,
etc; y. �
• Variet� in r�atet�ials, colors and textures;
- � • Distinctive fenestration patterns;
• Building stepbacks; and distinctive roofs forms.
In lceeping with the imagery and context of the existing building we are using the
same concept and materials that started with this location as the "o�iginal" Hooters
Restaurant and that has made it an "ican" t� t�e public. �Ve will use distinctive roof
forms, and stepping parapet walls. The color� to be used will be mainly shades of
gray and white.
e. The proposed development provides for appropriate buffers,
enhanced landscape design and appropriate distances between
buildings.
Through this proposal the site and building will receive many upgrades; the re-
development plan offers sufficient buffers with appropriate distances between
buildings and enhanced landscaping within all buffers and islands.
****************��*�
10/17/2011 4:07 PM RMR
�, J �':'4wYA •a - �� . .... . ...
k .. .. . . , ...
,.,.••"`� '.��..:.:'�.�-.f'�.�.��.,'.��..
O