FLD2011-10035; 2118 DREW ST; ANIMAL HEALTHCARE CLINIC 4
_
2118 DREW ST
Date Received: 10/3/2011 10:20:18 AM
Animal Healthcare Clinic
ZONING DISTRICT: Commercial
LAND USE: Commercial General
ATLAS PAGE: 280B
PLANNER OF RECORD: ESC
PLANNER: Ellen Crandall, Planner II
CDB Meeting Date: November 15, 2011
Case Number: FLD2011-10035
Agenda Item: D.S.
Owner: Leich�eld, LLC
Applicant: Josepha Mvron, Mark M. ron
Address: 2118 Drew Street
CITY OF CLEARWATER
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
STAFF REPORT
GENERAL INFORMATION:
REQUEST: Flexible Development application to permit a 5,220 square foot
Veterinary Office in an existing building within the Commercial (C)
and Office (0) Districts with a lot area of 27,407 square feet, a lot
width of 123.7 feet, front (south) setbacks of 25 feet (to pavement),
and 309 feet(to existing building), side (east) setback of 2.16 feet (to
existing building), side (west) setbacks of 2 feet (to existing
pavement) and 46.8 feet (to existing building}, rear (north) setbacks
of 12 feet (to proposed pavement) and 103 feet (to existing building),
a building height of 16 feet (to flat roo�, and 25 off-street parking
spaces as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project under the
Provisions of Community Development Code Section 2-703.C., as
well as reduction to the side (east) landscape buffer from 5 feet to 2
feet, a reduction in the side (west) landscape buffer from 5 feet to 2
feet, a reduction in the required interior landscaping from 10% of the
vehicular use area to 8.4%, as a Comprehensive Landscape Program
under the provisions of the Community Development Code Section
3-1202.G.
ZONING DISTRICT: Commercial (C) and Office (0) Districts
FUTURE LAND USE
PLAN CATEGORY: Commercial General (CG)
PROPERTY USE: Current Use: Vacant (previously Office)
Proposed Use: Veterinary Office
EXISTING North: Office (0)District
SURROUNDING Office
ZONING AND USES: South: Commercial (C) District
Office
East: Commercial (C) District
Office
West: Commercial (C) District
Office
Community Development Board—November 15,2011
FLD2011- 10035—Page 1
ANALYSIS:
Site Location and Existing Conditions:
The 0.63 acre site is located on the north side of Drew Street and immediately west of Starcrest
Drive. The site consists of an existing 5,220 square foot building with twenty-five off-street
parking spaces. Parking areas are located to the north and west sides of the building. The lot is
narrow with a 123 foot width; however, it is a deep lot (approximately 239 feet) which accounts
for the existing site layout. The majority of the property is in the Commercial (C) District;
however the northern 25 feet of the property are in the Office (0) District; however the entire
property has a Future Land Use Designation of Commercial General (CG). The O District
portion of the property will be used as landscaping and parking. The building is set back 30.9
feet from the front property line along Drew Street. It is approximately 39.9 feet wide and is
situated adjacent to the east property line.
Surrounding properties are in the C and O Districts however all have an office use.
Development Proposal:
The application proposes to establish a Veterinary Clinic in the existing 5,220 square foot office
building. This site will serve as a Veterinary Clinic only and will not provide animal boarding or
kenneling. Previously this location was occupied by a Land Surveying Office which moved in
2009 and a Real Estate Office which closed in 2011. The change in use from Office to
Veterinary Clinic and the existing non-conforming setbacks required the applicant to file an
application as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project. The site conforms to cunent
standards for minimum lot area, lot width, impervious surface ratio (I.S.R.) and floor area ratio
(F.A.R.), however additional landscaping is proposed. The existing building and pavement
setbacks are nonconforming to current Code requirements. Asphalt is proposed to be removed at
the rear property line; this will increase the site conformity with an increased setback, landscape
buffer, and interior landscaping and will not detract from the function or parking requirements of
the site. The applicant proposes to make some minor modifications to the facade by painting the
building. Other site improvements will include restriping the parking lot, ensuring handicap
access routes comply with ADA requirements, and adding landscaping within allowable areas.
The proposal's compliance with the applicable development standards of the Community
Development Code (CDC) is discussed below.
Floor Area Ratio: Pursuant to the Countywide Plan Rules the maximum allowable FAR is 0.55
for properties with a Future Land Use Map designation of CG. The overall proposed FAR is
0.19, which is consistent with the above.
Impervious Surface Ratio (ISR2 Pursuant to the Countywide Plan Rules the maximum allowable
ISR is 0.90 for properties with a Future Land Use Map designation of CG. The proposed ISR is
0.75, which is consistent with the above.
Minimum Lot Area and Width: Pursuant to CDC Table 2-704, there is no minimum required lot
area or lot width for a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project. However, for a point of
comparison, the minimum lot area requirement for offices is 10,000 square feet. The subject
Community Development Board—November 15,2011
FLD2011- 10035—Page 2
property has a lot area of 27,407 square feet. The minimum lot width requirement for an office
is 100 feet. The width of the subject property is 123.4 feet along Drew Street.
Minimum Setbacks: Pursuant to CDC Table 2-704, there are no minimum setback requirements
for a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project. However, for a point of comparison, the
minimum setback requirements for an office are 25 feet (front), 10 feet(rear), and 20 feet (rear).
With regard to setbacks to the existing building, no changes are proposed to the site that would
affect the existing building setbacks. However a swath of asphalt, 9 feet by 99 feet to the north
will be removed and replaced with landscaping. The parking spaces in this area will be shifted to
the south and with not have negative results to the dimensions or drive aisle. In addition asphalt
will be removed for a 17 foot by 21 foot landscape island in the northeast corner of the property.
This additional landscaping will result in a 12 foot rear setback and landscape area. Flexibility
has been requested with regard to the setbacks to the vehicular use areas and building. The
request includes a side (east) setback of 2.16 feet (to existing building), a side (west) setback of 2
feet (to existing pavement), and a rear (north) setback of 12 feet (to proposed pavement).The
setbacks to existing pavement and building are acceptable to Staff.
Maximum Buildin� Hei� Pursuant to CDC Table 2-704, there is no maximum allowable
height for a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project. However, for a point of comparison,
the maximum building height for an office can range between 25 feet and 50 feet. The existing
building height is 16 feet (to flat roo fl. The proposed building height of 16 feet is less than the
Code provisions.
Minimum Off-Street Parkin�: Pursuant to CDC Table 2-704, the minimum required parking for a
Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project is determined by the Community Development
Coordinator based on the specific use andlor ITE Manual standards. The off-street parking
requirement for a veterinary clinic use is 4 spaces per 1,000 square feet of gross floor area, which
for a 5,220 square foot building would result in a requirement of 21 spaces. The site has 25
parking spaces. No additional off-street parking is proposed as part of this application.
Landscapin�: Pursuant to CDC Section 3-1202.D.1, this site is required a fifteen-foot wide
landscape buffer along Drew Street, and five-foot wide landscape buffers on the sides and rear.
The request for flexibility is for a reduction to the side (east and west) landscape buffers from 5
feet to 2 feet.
To mitigate for the deviations to the landscape buffer requirements, asphalt will be removed for a
9 feet by 99 feet area along the north property line and asphalt will be removed for a 17 foot by
21 foot landscape island at the northeast corner of the property. This additional landscaping will
provide a landscape buffer along the north property line that is in excess of minimum code
requirements as well as and increase in the amount of interior landscaping from 1.5 to 8.4
percent of the vehicular use area. The site and surrounding sites have mature live oaks, as such
only one shade tree is proposed in the new landscape island. Shrubs and ground cover are
proposed for the north, south, east and west boundaries while two accent trees are proposed on
the western buffer and one in the landscape island adjacent to the west building fa�ade. The
additional landscaping area and materials make up for the deficiency in the width of the buffers
to visually enhance the property.
Community Development Board—November 15,2011
FLD201 1- 10035—Page 3
Pursuant to CDC Sections 3-1202., ten percent of the gross vehicular use area shall be provided
as landscape isiands a minimum of eight feet wide and 150 square feet in size and foundation
plantings shall be provided for 100 percent of a building fa�ade with frontage along a street
right-of-way. The foundation plantings must be within an area that is a minimum of five feet
wide and consist of at least two accent trees or three palm trees for every 40 linear feet of
building fa�ade and one shrub for every 20 square feet of required landscape area. A minimum
of 50 percent of the area shall contain shrubs with the remainder to be ground cover. Additional
landscaping is proposed that will increase the amount of interior landscaping from l.5 to 8.4
percent of the vehicular use area. Foundation landscaping of ground cover and shrubs is
proposed for 100 percent of the building fa�ade area. Staff supports the proposed landscaping.
The applicant is also asking for flexibility from CDC Section 3-1204.D., that requires all
landscaping be protected from vehicular and pedestrian traffic by the installation of curbing and
wheel stops, or other protective devices along the perimeter of any landscaping which adjoins
vehicular use areas or sidewalks. The site currently does not have any curbing, wheel stops, or
other protective devised along the perimeter of any of the landscaping. Is will be a condition of
approval that the site will provide protection as required in CDC Section 3-1204.D.
Comprehensive Landscape Program: Pursuant to Section 3-1202.G of the Community
Development Code, the landscaping requirements contained within the Code can be waived or
modified if the application contains a Comprehensive Landscape Program satisfying certain
criteria. The following table depicts the consistency of the development proposal with those
criteria:
Consistent Inconsistent
1. Architectural theme:
a. The landscaping in a comprehensive landscape program shall be designed as a N/A N/A
part of the architectural theme of the principle buildings proposed or developed on
the parcel proposed for development;or
b. The design, character, location and/or materials of the landscape treatment X
proposed in the comprehensive landscape program shal] be demonstrably more
attractive than landscaping otherwise permitted on the parcel proposed for
development under the minimum landscape standards.
2. Lighting: Any lighting proposed as a part of a comprehensive landscape program is X
automatically controlled so that the lighting is turned off when the business is closed.
3. Community character: The landscape treatment proposed in the comprehensive X
landscape program will enhance the community character of the City of Clearwater.
4. Properry values: The landscape treatment proposed in the comprehensive landscape X
program will have a beneficial impact on the value of property in the immediate
vicinity of the parcel proposed for development.
5. Special area or scenic corridor plan: The landscape treatment proposed in the N/A N/A
comprehensive landscape program is consistent with any special area or scenic
corridor plan which the City of Clearwater has prepared and adopted for the area in
which the parcel proposed for development is]ocated.
Solid Waste: The site has an existing dumpster. This location will be moved to the south as a
swath of asphalt will be removed for additional landscaping. The dumpster will be screened with
six foot PVC fencing.
Community Development Board—November 15,2011
FLD2011- 10035—Page 4
Si�ht Visibility Triangles: Pursuant to CDC Section 3-904.A, to minimize hazards at the
driveways, no structures or landscaping may be installed which will obstruct views at a level
between 30 inches above grade and eight feet above grade within 20-foot sight visibility
triangles. No structure or landscaping is proposed within the sight triangles.
Si�ge: The applicant is not proposing any signage concurrent with this development proposal.
It is noted that pursuant to Section 6-104 of the Community Development Code, in the event a
building permit is required for the redevelopment of a principal use/structure nonconforming
signs on the parcel proposed for development shall be brought into compliance. The most recent
submitta� does not include this information. Without a sign inventory of existing signs located
on the subject property it cannot be determined whether this Code is met. It has been attached as
a condition of approval that all existing and future signage must meet the requirements of Code.
Code Enforcement Analysis: There are no active Code Enforcement cases for the subject
property.
COMPLIANCE WITH STANDARDS AND CRITERIA:
The following table depicts the consistency of the development proposal with the standards of
the Commercial General (CG) land use category, the Commercial (C) and Office (0) Districts as
per CDC Sections 2-701.1, Table 2-704, 2-1001.1 and Table 2-1004:
Standard Proposed Consistent Inconsistent
FAR 0.55 0.19 X
ISR 0.90 0.75 X
Minimum Lot Area N/A 27,407 sq.ft.(0.63 acres) X
Minimum Lot Width N/A Drew: 299 feet X
Minimum Setbacks Front: N/A South: 25 feet(to pavement) X
309 feet(to building)
Side: N/A East: 2.16 feet(to building) X
West: 2 feet(to pavement) X
46.8 feet(to building)
Rear: N/A North: 12 feet(to pavement) X
103 feet(to building)
Maximum Height N/A 16 feet(to pitched roofl X
Minimum 4 spaces per 1,000 SF GFA 25 parking spaces X
Off-Street Parking (21 spaces)
COMPLIANCE WITH FLEXIBILITY CRITERIA:
Community Development Board—November 15,2011
FLD2011- 10035—Page 5
The following table depicts the consistency of the development proposal with the Flexibility
criteria as per CDC Section 2-704.0 (Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project):
Consistent Inconsistent
1. The development or redevelopment is otherwise impractical without deviations from X
the use and/or development standards set forth in this zoning district.
2. The development or redevelopment will be consistent with the goals and policies of X
the Comprehensive Plan, as well as with the general purpose, intent and basic
planning objectives of this Code, and with the intent and puipose of this zoning
district.
3. The development or redevelopment will not impede the normal and orderly X
development and improvement of surrounding properties.
4. Adjoining properties will not suffer substantial detriment as a result of the proposed X
development
5. The proposed use shall otherwise be permitted by the underlying future land use X
category, be compatible with adjacent land uses, will not substantially alter the
essential use characteristics of the neighborhood; and shall demonstrate compliance
with one or more of the following objectives:
a. The proposed use is permitted in this zoning district as a minimum standard,
flexible standard or flexible development use;
b. The proposed use would be a significant economic contributor to the City's
economic base by diversifying the local economy or by creating jobs;
c.• The development proposal accommodates the expansion or redevelopment of an
existing economic contributor;
d. The proposed use provides for the provision of affordable housing;
e. The proposed use provides for development or redevelopment in an area that is
characterized by other similar development and where a land use plan
amendment and rezoning would result in a spot land use or zoning designation;
or
f. The proposed use provides for the development of a new and/or preservation of a
working waterfront.
6. Flexibility with regard to use, lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street X
parking are justified based on demonstrated compliance with all of the following
design objectives:
a. The proposed development will not impede the normal and orderly development
and improvement of the surrounding properties for uses permitted in this zoning
district;
b. The proposed development complies with applicable design guidelines adopted
by the City;
c. The design, scale and intensity of the proposed development supports the
established or emerging character of an area;
d. In order to form a cohesive, visually interesting and attractive appearance, the
proposed development incorporates a substantial number of the following design
elements:
❑ Changes in horizontal building planes;
❑ Use of architectural details such as columns, cornices, stringcourses,
pilasters,porticos,balconies,railings,awnings,etc.;
❑ Variety in materials,colors and textures;
❑ Distinctive fenestration patterns;
❑ Building step backs;and
D Distinctive roofs forms.
e. The proposed development provides for appropriate buffers, enhanced landscape
desi n and a ro riate distances between buildin s.
COMPLIANCE WITH GENERAL STANDARDS FOR LEVEL TWO APPROVALS:
The following table depicts the consistency of the development proposal with the General
Standards for Level Two Approvals as per CDC Section 3-914.A:
Community Development Board—November I5,2011
FLD2011- 10035—Page 6
Consistent Inconsistent
l. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, X
coverage,densiTy and character of adjacent properties in which it is located.
2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage development and use of X
adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof.
3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons X
residing or working in the neighborhood.
4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. X
5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the X
immediate vicinity.
6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including X
visual,acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts on adjacent properties.
SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION:
The Development Review Committee (DRC) reviewed the application and supporting materials
at its meeting of November 3, 2011, and deemed the development proposal to be legally
sufficient to move forward to the Community Development Board (CDB), based upon the
following:
Findings of Fact. The Planning and Development Department, having reviewed all evidence
submitted by the applicant and requirements of the Community Development Code, finds that
there is substantial competent evidence to support the following findings of fact:
1. The 0.63 acres on the north side of Drew Street and immediately west of Starcrest Drive;
2. That the subject property is located within the Commercial (C) District and Office (0)
District and the Commercial General (CG) Future Land Use Plan category;
3. The site is currently improved with a 5,220 square foot office building;
4. The application proposes to convert the existing 5,220 square-foot office building into a
veterinary clinic;
5. The subject property is presently non-conforming with respect to the existing building and
off-street parking area not meeting the minimum required setbacks;
6. The applicant proposes to remove existing asphalt to provide additional buffer width and
landscaping;
7. The proposed Comprehensive Landscape Program will provide additional landscaping within
green spaces as well as retain existing live oak trees.;
8. The proposal has no negative impact upon the following development standards: F.A.R.,
I.S.R., minimum lot area/size and maximum building height;
9. The proposed use will not exacerbate the existing nonconforming setbacks for the off-street
parking area;
10. Based on the existing character of the surrounding area, the proposed use is compatible and
consistent with this character of the immediate area; and
11. There are no active Code Enforcement cases for the subject property.
Conclusions of Law. The Planning and Development Department, having made the above
findings of fact, reaches the following conclusions of law:
Community Development Board—November 15,2011
FLD2011- 10035—Page 7
l. That the development proposal is consistent with the Standards as per Sections 2-?Ol.l and
2-1001.1 and Tables 2-703 and 2-1003, of the Community Development Code;
2. That the development proposal is consistent with the Flexibility criteria as per Sections 2-
704.0 and 2-1004.0 of the Community Development Code;
3. That the development proposal is consistent with the General Standards for Level Two
Approvals as per Section 3-914.A of the Community Development Code; and
4. That the development proposal is consistent with the criteria of the Comprehensive
Landscape Program as per Section 3-1202.G of the Community Development Code.
Based upon the above, the Planning and Development Department recommends APPROVAL of
Flexible Development application to permit a 5,220 square foot Veterinary Office in an existing
building within the Commercial (C) District with a lot area of 27,407 square feet, a lot width of
123.7 feet, front (south) setbacks of 25 feet (to pavement), and 30.9 feet (to existing building),
side (east) setback of 2.16 feet (to existing building), side (west) setbacks of 2 feet (to existing
pavement) and 46.8 feet (to existing building), rear (north) setbacks of 12 feet (to proposed
pavement) and 103 feet (to existing building), a building height of 16 feet (to flat roo fl, and 25
off-street parking spaces as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project under the Provisions
of Community Development Code Section 2-703.C., as well as reduction to the side (east)
landscape buffer from 5 feet to 2 feet, a reduction in the side (west) landscape buffer from 5 feet
to 2 feet, a reduction in the required interior landscaping from 10% of the vehicular use area to
8.4%, as a Comprehensive Landscape Program under the provisions of the Community
Development Code Section 3-1202.G.subject to the following conditions:
Conditions of A�proval:
1. That, a building permit be obtained for the parking lot improvements, landscaping and
building improvements;
2. That, prior to the issuance of a certificate of completion or business tax receipt, whichever
occurs first adequate landscaping as per CDC requirements in Section CDC Section 3-
1202.B. be provided in the rear landscape area and a new landscape plan is provided;
3. That, prior to the issuance of a certificate of completion or business tax receipt, whichever
occurs first, pin curbing be provided around all landscape areas adjacent to vehicular use as
per CDC Section 3-1204.D.;
4. That all existing and any future signage must meet the requirements of Code and be
architecturally integrated with the design of the building with regard to proportion, color,
material and finish as part of a final sign package submitted to and approved by Staff;
Prepared by Planning and Development Department Staff: ���(/�O��:x.i
Ellen Crandall, Planner II
ATTACHMENTS:Location Map;Aerial Map;Zoning Map;Existing Sunounding Uses Map;and Photographs
Community Development Board—November 15,2011
FLD2011- 10035—Page 8
� N o
z � �
� 205
rn o A o ~ ' 2`'°ti 3
atio6. � o ° N T�
N � 901, �
�`' J � ti GRAHAM DR �
� � 3 o m
� �
� (Q 2o7t N w w � ztot y
C7� (p � � 2073 � o o �
�� � Q 2075 � 2106 ~
r � 2077
� 2o�s
O � 21 � W 2083 � 6y�y ��� 2105
2085
� ^' 2087 v C ��1
� 2089 � y B
� 2091
N m ~ �2 5L6Z
W � 2095 � p�bZ �ti �'�
2097 y �ti
1
y�Z /� 2 � �� �2�2
O � 2105 p V'2� �Q �2
� 0
o �� �1,2 ��y Z 6�yti
�• �*� Qj ti�2
� `�� � �£�2 �2 0��2
� 2111 � � � �Q
o � ��
� � 2
o i g��2 .;� �E� ��2
D � n � i ��'� z
Q � � � +� 6��2 9�,b
Q � ARCRESTDR �z`'' tl�2
�
� Z
(D �• O yZb �
O �py
N V b '1�z9
2131 �py2
� � r 2133 pqb2
�` 2135
� W O 2137 •, •.b5��;•
D 2139
� � rnm on`"i 2141 -. •
� O . . ... , .. . :�5`2
�" N MA1N AVE ZS��,�2 • • �.. � � •
o � 99�� . . • -Not ta Scale_.
+ � .. • °' ,, •'r�'," '
2165 - ' .. ' . . '',m�. .
� . - , -Na(a Survey-
�, .L. 4'a, .�. � .. . . . �
"' � .� ;..'...�.' � i' r• ••• ._. •� ''•�••�•''•
PALIdE`fTfl 5 ---•J'- •,R-55(7 iPf�L-}h�i4O-=��= . •'�'•
arriage n ��� � ` "
ARL4NUTON �. , = _°
.� , z ? C
� 4'" Q�' } ,� � 'a.� ---•-7 _�t
j'+'�G'�` .r:� ;'
i�antern Way ,,✓- �
� � , �C,�' •��°�
�___1l� � �� ���
���� ;�
C �P �. .� '
4
� �� ��,� •
�
� �
fAAR1LYN ST tdARJLYN 53 SHARKEY� f1�L7':;'� .�':.—'_:^
S� � a ❑ Q � c,���, � i,Q~ �'_. .� ... '�'.
�� a� � r� ,,:-�- r-* , -�'•�'.••.�. • ' ' �•••.
�� ¢ MCKMLEY �q :� +t*'���;,��-.+1 �RR���•'.'t}R'' �'. •'�..
� � � >- � ``'.::::� '+'� �•: .':..... ,�- � , �. _."'• :: ..
rw�flir�c � � � '�... , � . ,...._ . . •: ,, ¢� ...�
�° ?�.azA a u�, 'Q PL� •°\ f-yr +�.,'•.',�'���'�R �{�R-.,�_.° � . ,�
p � ,L (Y �,j�Rt` ��!�•: .r t,� �� :-••. . .- ' � .
ST � � FWRDING � VO4� l;'•�••• F1. � ...'�'� . .�.. �'. ,�. ' -4,�,
� ��' � ��- �• '1i° -� �J._`P'►f?€2j4U�N. ...�yR: 'c] '..
❑ � 4- �'-f--
r�zn .`t} ------._..----'-• F'
DREYJ ST "— CR-528,
9.'..
r.�
PROJECT `�"` '
� � } �..
� � e a SI TE ° ; ;:
� �;.
U�
sr � �, .�
o a ��
� � � � :.�
� m T �� � C�7 �.�.ua_:
� d V � � � r � �
W O � "' � `� Z �
r c� � � t� ¢ �
� ¢ � `"� s d WFA7MAN
Z �
Z
OR � ...� � {�{a.UCE
�
CAMELt34 �' �
4
� SHELL
c�+�u
Location Map
Owner: Leichgeld, LLC Case: FLD2011-10035
Site: 2118 Drew Property Size: 0.63 Acres
PIN: 1 2-29-1 5-59 1 84-000-001 3 Atlas Page: 280B
� �'' •.�u,.
MCK/NLEYST �•''�o " ,o • • • �`��-':'„
1� � � . .�. : O.-:
h `'' 9� ��"' 0 ;`''�;:: ' �,
o N 35 N � � 8 �`�,6'l�i� �A`� �' .sa.•�+.'•. .. o �
-f a-�.
r� -.�� a
,4 31 0 3„ a ekach d � `' � G� � �' ? ?
'� P '
o a�a O
ss �G , .
Q We gs 6 1�� � , :.
3 13 30 Z 30� 37 � 5 �? � a� O ':�5�
� 4 ?' /10 � a�Oi `. . %�:6;.
4 12 � 3�a d� � 16�� ?�J� , •�,��_.• .
3 � p .
1� � �/ �., O . �:�'{��.=..
30 / ' . .
o� � , ��,�O °.•o•.
i� 2 �� l ,�$5 z �._� �:�e°:
a ^` ��/ 5918 .
218 2d9 / ` � d j'?� �"_ •�'�.`"� � -
10 � > ?� � •• ••
� �91/ ?' � 3 ' ..
�0 6� ?� � ' -�4. .
9 �d `b � O ICe � • .
� �
� �,ao � - ,
a
8 �� s a� ^ 2 �; .
\ \
.'�� 1`=�-� fi`c '`�,�� 0 Office � .
$ .�� 55818 �"� � \� °O O
�. O < r,
� • \ � �€�C@ c3 � -
Y: �:�.v.• � �% �'>> �/ .-% c'a `'N a �'d,o o,� ' .,
•' - -• �• ° -�-{�-�.� ° � ° � `ri-
'�L_ _�"R=�"'_
�saoo �� DREW ST
DREW ST
� � :r�.��ra.roM�r.°'� aa �-
000000�oaao 00 � ,. � � �,
N N N N N N N N N N� N N O N �
1 I 2 O e� N
01 a�M M) t�01 a-
� A t�me N q M M M�7 V
Retail ales a d N N N N N N N r•
� 3 L 9
— � 14616 �Sel"�'1C 0
"� W
�— �s2 �
3 � h 119 120 117
113 121 129 4 ���e �LI N71.13 Ac 178 Q
4 110 105 � _ � 120 � 115 118 ¢ 4
I 62830 � Q �
5 1 100 y 101 �
Z
10 101 3
6 1 2 ' 3 101
N
Existing Surrounding Uses Map
Owner: Leichgeld, LLC Case: FLD201 1-1 0035
Site: 21 18 Drew Property Size: 0.63 Acres
PIN: 12-29-15-59184-000-0013 Atlas Page: 280B
i _
Ellen Crandall
100 South Myrtle Avenue
Clearwater,FL 33756
727-562-4836
ellen.crandall(cr�,m�elean��ater.com
PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE
■ Planner II
City of Clearrvater, Clearwater, Florida May 2010 to Present
Duties include performing the technical review and preparation of staff reports for various land
development applications, the organization of data and its display in order to track information and
provide status reports.
■ Planner I
City of Clearwater, Clearwater, Florida December 2009 to May 201 D
Assist public customers at the Zoning Counter. Review Building Permits, Sign Permits, Business Tax
Receipts, and Landscape Plans as well as Comprehensive Sign Program Applications, and Flexible
Standard Developments. Regulate growth and development of the City in accordance with land
resource ordinances and regulations related to community development. Interdepartmental and
zoning assistance. Respond as a City representative to citizens, City officials, and businesses
concerning ordinances and regulations. Make recommendations and presentations at staff level at
various review committees,boards, and meetings.
■ Community Planner
Bradford County, Towanda, Pennsylvania January 2008 to May 2009
Coordinates with the 51 municipalities in Bradford County and assisted them in writing
Comprehensive Plans, developing ordinances, and general public and municipal education on zoning,
land use, and ordinances. I developed a comprehensive Zoning Lexicon that included zoning maps,
districts and definitions for all municipalities with zoning ordinances. Assisted in the County Parks
Plan and in developing a comprehensive Park's book listing all the parks in Bradford County. I
assisted mapping the natural gas wells as well as printing maps and parcel data for the gas companies.
■ Intern
Pennsylvania Geologic Survey, Middletown, Pennsylvania May 2006 to September 2006
Scanned geologic maps,updated documents and assisted in general office tasks.
EDUCATION
Bachelor of Science, -Major: Geography,-Minor: Art, -Certificate: Geo�raphic Information S s�tem
SHIPPENSBURG ZINIVERSITY, Shippensburg, Pennsylvania
ISA, International Society of Arboriculture, Certified Arborist
LEED Green Associate
!' �'LL1, `t. � l , �,,� 1
�� ` �. .� p .
� • v
♦ � ' �•�r' � �
� `�• _- _. � �< �. � _,
� �`v M ro� .,� '� �i
';.;�i► , ,��.
, .
,
, t` , _ , ,..
.� �
y
�'`'��� , a� . �� � " �„
,t `�- �� .: `,;t ,.`: .u,�:
t, +` ;^1�ti � .,'..�, ,��T i'
.1 �� �1 }V` . ° r. � �
�4 \r ��.+ �.Y �►�:. >;r'�
. ♦�� 1� � � y I
K� \. .�� �.
�+ + �� 'w �� \
. r„ .' `.,,� ,�iy', ^�
� �.• � ..'��. � �• ���.. :# � �\. .` I
v}ii"��. , �
, �"�� � ..��' sS. �
.w �,,
x � y�l!. ��' ± f. � �.
`1 ��- } � � ��x���'���
3 . � •'� �'K� �
f ,,1.�.. ��� �� ` a, v.` � � � �� �
�,� �. � �`' /�r'tie,� k� •' \.,+ R � �� �
, _ . , �+ .
.
�il�, r � 1►�R
. �
, � � . �:.��� '.. \ -, • , r �
�� � � � r� . . �; ..�� . t � +^(z"?�.. � , V'"� .. � ,� �� S 1t. , �.,t��,
_. _ . ` _ U',i:Ll"�1' T. m T. � • �n- �� °7,,; `_:.,. �` e, � r+-
'�,�� -�.. " _ � � �//.�� � 1!r �yg R » � � R
,� k. . '�"*� ,�,•r' F� � �I ' --�` - ., r �:. �
,. • _,.
��'� • �� (6 .
- , ""
-., � , \
, � _ r- ° e}♦
., f
... �j�I,. k �1 '�( ��.� . F
'� +J—_ ��f/ iA�. r ��1�.. ���� Iy , ��� ..t` �\. �
} , ___ __ .. _�------�'- .� � .rer�F�1�: ' � '� �. ��
� . �J ,
.r,. � � ,�5.'� r � J ;�.
_ ,i�� ,. '._. * �'��.aw.,:�:. 1� 'T. � 6 f 1 1 '� � ���T'�: •
, .�� I�.. ��. ' ' .�1 1�x�''�r+ �' �
` �. _, ,� !!� r
,� *� � ��.
� '" '°� � :`;''' p'';
t:' ' 'J J �
r �► R �. .
� x
_ �v' "T .� ��,�,p�
��Mi � ' . �e�
w � `
�` � - ( I�� ....v +� � '��'-., *. �R+ ',,
t � � . �: i� �.+� '��.
Aerial Map
Owner: Leichgeld, LLC Case: FLD2011-10035
Site: 2118 Drew Property Size: 0.63 Acres
PIN: 12-29-15-59184-000-0013 Atlas Page: 280B
f.
_ .� � t�
,, �,.
•� 1 � �,,�
'�� i�� . �-""�'�
� �� �� .
::,�� ��
�� .� ����a� � � ,
� .5�
. _
. d„ � 1�'i�8 �_v tY-f,s d�.u'x'}K�x ,-. � - �
��� � �
� �� � �
_ �� 1 �
wi.���� �.��
� �".�`�, �
�� ���°�.���
- . • y ay . .
South building elevation West building elevation
� � , =
��°� i ���'I' � 6 I 1 ��`+: � °r�.
� ��� �I
�_�+� ' F� 't� ,�, ,�r�4"$;•" � �;-.
u
��„M� �. ���i
,t a �e;
/� • ��� x
,.. , ...,_.. ,
_. �
� ��
a"
North building elevation and parking area Southern property line and existing dumpster
2118 Drew
FLD2011-10035
Page 1 of 1
. � .
P�nnlr�g S Development c.nsE rn�BErt:
- �P�'� RECEIVED BY(SmfF Ml�els}:
�learwater �,��� �����:
_ Tslspl'�n�727�6'2�567
r-�:rn�z.�8�
O SUBMIT ORIGMIAL SIC,NED AH0 NOTAR�D APPUCATIOM
0 SUBIWIT 14 CDPIES DF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION-Plans amd
app�icat�n ars�aquirod fio�colls�sd.staPled and iolded'm�o se�s
ir NOTE:A TtTiJi1L OF 13 dEf�OF TF�APPLIGITIQN AND ALL 3UPPORTNaII'i DQCU�IENTATIOM��REQ TO BE sUBM11T�IN
CONJUflCTION W11'M A CO�LER LEV�.ONE OR LEVEL TWO APPLICATION.
COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM
�i�rzoio�
�PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT�
�PLICANT,�tOPat7Y dWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION:(Codo Sectlon�-�Z02.A►)
MPi�ANTNAIf�: 1 aichna�� � C
IW11L9�0l1DQRE�:
PHf7NE NUMBEF� CELL NUk�ER:
e-rrui�wa�s: MMYRON�americaii.com
v
��TM��:
L��L DIYI�1�WI�@ 1�BOd
w6�r�: G2 Desi n LLC Eric Glinsboeckel
r�w��noo�ss:
�Nw�sErt �727�527-0130 FA)iPRJMBER: N�,4
cELL au�a� ��,�� 6$6 q724 ��5s:
�h.I�les�s4u�•ms�s aF A.ad.�,D�e 1�,ru�r b.ewdlll�a or r�edvsd w i�oF.t�i a�.�I.�le 8bmdad►or L.ew�l7wv
��P�1�PP��,�ON ca��ny►b�.K��9on far d�lopnMnt appr�6�clud�s a Com�1�M L.and�c�
Pro�rany whl�h aalldMs Uu ioRo�rqly crM�e1�. Tln 1� ad lu+dr� P�Isn�. �� �d P�P�� �Y�
nsceaary iv appl�nt tl��a�n p�ovld�d on tfd�worlwh�at.Larnheap�anoclabd�h tl�s C�pnhsnNvs L�d�pps Proar�n
�Y�d mq�num Cod�r+�quMam�s lo oihat!!a�wh�A�eMlmun�Caels rrl�nat 6a raqt.
1. �tRCF9'fFCTURAL'T1�IYI�
i The lan�g M a Camprehee�va L�ProOrmn s�M be deNgned�a patt af fie an:M4ec4u�tttems of q�Prk�l buY�nps
ProPosed or deu�lopod at the Ps�l ProPouod fior the davalaPmo�d-
OR
b_ Ths deslgn,d�arnclar,locatlon�dlar mated�of the Isnd�Ps 4�a�pmposed In�Comprohenshre Lm�scape Progtam�be
demor�aYably mae attrac6+�e tF�lan�capinp othsrwiss permil�d on tlna P�P�P��r developme��der tha rtdrtirn�an lendsmps
a�n�ards.
See attached a response .
r�e�a�z
� i ,
2. LIGHTING:
My lighting proposed as a part of a comprehensive landscape program is automatically controlled so that the lighting is tumed off when the
business is closed.
No new lightinq is proposed for the pro�ect.
3. COMMUNITY CHARACTER:
The landscape treatment proposed in the Comprehensive Landscape Program will enhance the community charader of the City of Clearwater.
Discussions with the City of Clearwater have taken place to
ensure that the proposed landscapinq fits the desired community
character The landscapina has therefore been chosen to flow
with the existing landscaping desired throuqhout the community.
4. PROPERTY VALUES:
The landscape treatment proposed in the Comprehensive Landscape Program will have a beneficiai impact on the value of the propeRy in the
immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development.
The added landscape will better screen the existing parking areas .
It will also enhance the right of way and provide a beneficail
impact to the adjacent properties and the existing site.
5. SPECIAL AREA OR SCENIC CORRIDOR PLAN:
The landscape treatment proposed in the Comprehensive Landscape Program is consistent with any special area or scenic corridor plan which
the City of Clearvvater has prepared and adopted for the area in which the parcel proposed for development is located.
Not Ag�licable
SIGNATURE:
I,the undersigned,acknowledge that ali representations made in STATE OF FLORIDA,COUNTY OF PINELLAS �y
this application are true and accurate to the best of my S o to and subscribed before me this «� day of
knowledge and authori City representatives to visit and ���QP1� ,A.D.20 o me and/or by
photograph the prope described in this applicatio�. , who is p na y knoWn has
pr �
� as identifica n.
igna property owner or representative ota u c,
My m ssion expires:
�N11111y �
'�,.�,`; �C���u#��24�
"'�°;;�`.°�' EXPIRES:November 7,2015
C:IDocuments and Settingslderek.fergusonlLoca!SettingslTemporary Intemet FileslContent.0utlooklKPMVX8F11Comprehensive Landscape Program
11 2010.docx
Page 2 of 2
. • - •
RE: 2118 Drew Street, Comprehensive Landscape Program
b. The design, character, location and/or materials of the landscape treatment proposed
in the Comprehensive Landscape Program shall be demonstrably more attractive than
landscaping otherwise permitted on the parcel proposed for development under the
minimum landscape standards.
Answer:
Enhancing shrubs are proposed for the east, west, north and south property lines. The
shrub line does not continue behind the building on the east property line due to the
buildings proximity to the property line. Ground cover is also proposed adjacent to the
right of way along with the shrubs to provide a five foot landscaped buffer. Ground
cover is also proposed for the interior landscape island and across the front portion of the
buiiding that is adjacent to the parking. Along with the ground cover shrubs are also
proposed for the front of the building wrapping around the southwest corner and
continuing to the southeast corner of the building. Grround cover was not proposed for
the entire southern portion of the building due to the density of the exposed root system
around the large existing oak tree. An understory tree is proposed for the interior
landscape island and an oak tree is proposed for the west property line. The existing tree
canopies are so large that additional trees were not proposed for the remaining perimeter
areas. Overall the new landscaping will greatly enhance the site without compromising
the required functionality.
_ __ �
,� .
Planning& Development � CASE#:
_ Department RECEIVED BY (staff initials)_
� Clearv�at�r �00 South Myrtle Avenue DATE RECEIVED
Ciearwater, Florida 33756
Telephone:727-562-4567
� Fax:727-562-4865
❑ SUBMIT ORIGINAt S{GNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATtON
❑ SUBMIT 14 COPIES OF THE�RIGINAL APPLICATION-Plans and
application are required to be collated,stapled,and folded into sets
O SUBMiT FIRE PRELIMARY SITE PLAN:$200.00
❑ SUBMIT APPLICATION FEE$
* NQTE:15 TOTAL SETS OF INFORMATION REQUIRED (APPLICATIONS PLUS SITE PLAN SETS)
FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION
Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project
(Revised 05.04.2010)
�FLEASE TYPE OR PRINT�
A. APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A)
APPLICANT NAME: L@ICII�eIC�,__._L.L�r ___ _ _ __._ __
MAILINGADDRESS: 62�R�CI��l_.RQgd,__I1[�OR_S-FJ[1C19S,_FL�4�SH------------
-- _ _.
PHONE NUMBER: �7Z7�44C-r'J�Q� _ _ FAX NUMBER: N/A _ _ _._...__. _ _
__
c���NuMBER _�727� 324-3539 ___ _ E"'A"- MMYBQNQamericaii.�Qm _ _ __
__
_
_ ______ _. ._ _ ____ ___ _ _.__ ____ _ _ _ __ _ ____
PROPERTY OWNER(S): _____ _ . __-___
J_osepha__I1L��crQn _____ ___ ___ --____ _ ---__ -------.__-- _ ___._------__.
List ALL owners on the deed Mark..M�(rOn__. . .
AGENT NAME: GZ D@S1911,_L_LC, Eric Glinsbo�ckel __ ___ __
_ _ ____ _ _ ____
MAILINGADDRESS: �030_35tF1_AVe N_,._��,_P���C$.bU�g,_FL_3�7Q4 _._ _
_ _ _
PHONE NUMBER: -�7Z7�_.�JZ7-Q�3O _ ____ FAX NUMBER' N/A ...__... _ _
CEIL NUMBER: ��T27�6SF)-�.ZZ4 _._ __ _ EMAIL eCJ_C��CIc'�fGI].lteCtU.L2_COC17
B. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A)
PROJECT NAME: Af11CY18I Healtll CIIIIIC PROJECT VALUATION' � 27 3�jQ,OO _..,,_.,__
___ __._._ _____ __.__ ___ __..
_ i_. _ _---
STREETADDRESS 2118 Drew Street
___ _....__ ...__---__. __._ __ __._ _. ___ ____ ___ -- __ _____ _-
PARCELNUMBER(S): 12/29/15/59184/000/0013
__ _ __ -- _ ___
_ _.
PARCEL SIZE(acres): O . 6 3 PARCEL SIZE(square feet). 2 7,4 0 7 S. f .
-- '£HAT PP�32'i` �F` LfYI` Z, MOSELL ACRES, ACCORDING TO THE PL�1T THEIZEOF-AS REC�RDED
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: �N---PLAT---BOOI4-..�.4.,- PAGE 7-0, OF 'FHE P�TBIsIE RECOI�DB OF PINEE�LAS-EOL3NPY, FF;ORIfDA,
DES.�1?IB$D_A�_EQLI�QHI&_:.,— - _ ______ _- _ _._____ _.__-----
_._.._ _ _. ------
PROPOSED USE(5):V2t2Y'lriaz'1d11 Of f ice
FROM THE NORTHEASTERLY CORNER OF SAID LOT 1, RUN THENCE S36°07'26"E, ALONG
DESCRIPTION OFREQUEST: THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 1, 170.0 FEET FOR THE POINT OF BEGINNING;
_ __ __ __ _ _ ___ __ _ _ _
Spec�cally identify the request THENCE CONTINUE S36°07'26"E, ALONG SAID EASTERLY LINE, 313.39 FEET TO 'TAE
(include number of units or square NORTHEKLY RIGHT"-QF=WAY LINE OF DREW STREET`; THEI��E Ng�°25'27"W, ALONG SAID
footage of non-residential use and�RTI-�E}2LY R3-G�I'£=QF=WAY LINE, t23.47 FEET; 'i`�iEPiCE N3f°09'26"W, 239.6O FEET"p - "
requested code deviations;e.g. CE_Id5.3-°�2'34-!!�, 99-:0—FEET-TO THE POINT OF BEGINi3ING:
S:1Planning DepartmentL4pplication Forms\Development Review�2010 Forms updated with new Department name\Comprehensive Infill Project(FLDj
5.2010.docx
Page 1 of 8
__ �
_ _ ._ ___ _ _
_ _
reduction in required number of
parking spaces,speciflc use,etc.)
dOES THIS APPLICATION INVOLVE THE TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS (TDR), A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED PLANNED UNI
DEVELOPMENT,OR A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED(CERTIFIED)SITE PLAN? YES_ N�X (if yes.attach a copy of the applicable documents}
C. PROOF OF OWNERSHIP: (Code Section 4-202.A.5)
❑ SUBMIT A COPY OF THE TITLE INSURANCE POLICY, DEED TO THE PROPERTY OR SIGN AFFIDAVIT ATTESTING OWNERSHIP (see
page 7)
D. WR{TTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 3-913.A)
�7 Provide complete responses to the six(6)GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA—Explain how each criteria is achieved,in detaii:
1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale,bulk,coverage,density and character of adjacent properties in which it
is located.
The development will be in harmony _with the _adjacent pro�erties because
- ------------------ ------- --
it is existing. The density and setbacks are comparable to neighboring
_ _ ___ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ ___ __ __ __. _.. _ __ _ _.
properties . The north building setback is reduced however the adjacent
_ ___..--- ___. _ ____
__--__ _ _.___ _ ._----_ _.
proper�y "fias a re�duced setback similar and will therefore match.
2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly
impair the value thereof.
The development will not hinder or discourage the use of adjacent land.
- - - -- _ _
__--- __ _ __ -- -- --
____.__--- ___ .---___ __ ____ _.__ _
The proposed use is compatible with the surrounding uses .
_ _ _
__ ___ _.__.. _ __ __. _ __ _.
3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the heaith or safety of persons residing or working in the neighborhoad of the proposed use-
The development is already existing. _ ADA _accessibility has been
�-- _._ - --�---
_ _ _--
--- ___.
improved for better access.
4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion.
The change of use from retail to veterinarian office will result in a
__ ____ __ ---____ __ _ __..
-- - -
____.__ __-- _--- _ _ _ _
reduction of vehicle trip counts .
_ ___. _____ __ ___ _ _ _.... __ _. _ __ _ _ __
5. The proposed devefopment is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development.
The development is consistent with the community character of
_ ____.-- -__ ___..
_ _ _ __ ___ _ ._._ - _--------- .__ _ _-- --.__ _ ______
neighboring properties . The parking and layout is similar to the
_
proper�ies adjacent to the north and south.
6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual,acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts,on
adjacent properties.
The development is already existing however new buffer landscaping
__--_ _--�__ __...
--__ ___ _ _ __ _- ----- _ .___ .____ ----_ -------- _ � _-- -_
consisting of hedges, trees, and ground cover will improve the
_ __
___ _ __ _ __ _ _ _
aesthetics .
S:\Planning DepartmentlApplication Forms\Development Review�2010 Forms updated with new Department namelCompreher�sive infill Project(FLD)
5.2010.docx
Page 2 of 8
_ �
WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Comprehensive Infil! Redevelopment Project Criteria}
t7 Provide complete responses to the six(6)COMPREHENSIVE INFILL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT CRITERIA—Explain how each criteria is
achieved in detail:
1. The development or redevelopment is otherwise fmpractical without deviations from the use and/or development standards set forth in ihis
zoning district.
The development is already existing. Therefore, changes to the
__ ___ __._ _
_ ____ __ __ __ _ _
existing development would be impractical and cost prohibitive.
_ __ _ __ _-- ___ _ ___ _. _..._ _
_ __ ____ ____ _..__. __ ___ ___ __ _ __.._.. __..____ _ ____ __ ___.
2. The development or redevelopment wll be consistent with the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Pian, as well as with the general
purpose,intent and basic pianning objectives of this Code,and with the intent and purpose of this zoning distrid
The proposed use satisfies the intent of the zoning district,__ _The _vet
__ ___ _ ----
-- --- ---- _ __ __
_ _ . _ -- -
office hours and overall appearance of the development _will be_._ ___
- ------_._____. ._____
__..________-------_
consistent with neighboring general office develo�ments .
3. The development or redevelopment wiii not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of surrounding properties_
The development will not impede surrounding properties . There will be
_. _ _ __ _ __ _ _
_ __ _
no outside kennels or boarding that would impact surrounding properti_es .
_ _ _... _ __ __. _ _ __ __ __._._. _ _ _
_ _. _ _. _ __ _ _ __. _ __. __ __ __ _
4 Adjoining properties will not suffer substantial detriment as a result of the proposed development.
Adjoining properties will not suffer as a result of this development._
___. _ ____
__ - _
__ __.__._- -------- _______ __ _ ____
- __ _ __--
The traffic counts and trip generation will be similar to that of
_ -- -_ ._____ _--____ .__
_ _._____-- _ ____ ._ .. .__
_ � -------- - ---___ ---_ ..
an office development.
5. The proposed use shall otherwise be permitted by the underlying future land use category, be compatfble with adjacent land uses, wili not
substantially alter the essential use characteristics of the neighborhood; and shall demonstrate comp�iance with one or more of the foilowing
objectives:
a. The proposed use is permitted in this zoning district as a minimum standard,flexible standard or flexible development use;
b- The proposed use would be a significant economic contributor to the City's economic base by diversifying the local economy or by creatfng
jobs;
c. The development proposai accommodates ihe expansion or redeveiopment or an exisiing economic coniripuTOr;
d. The proposed use provides for the provision of affordable housing;
e. The proposed use provides for development or redevelopment in an area that is characterized by other similar development and where a
land use plan amendment and rezoning would result in a spot land use or zoning designation;or
f. The proposed use provides for the development of a new and/or preservation of a working waterfront use.
A, B, and C.
__ _.. .. ___ _ _ __ _ _ _ __ _..__ _ _ __ _ __ _
_ __ ____
__ ____ _ _._ _ _. _ __ _
6. Flexibility with regard to use,lot width, required setbacks,height and off-street parking are justified based on demonstrated compliance with afi of
the following design objectives:
a. The proposed development will not impede the normai and orderly development and improvement of the surrounding properties for uses
permitted in this zoning district;
b. The proposed developme�t compiies with applicable design guidefines adopted by the City;
c. The design,scale and intensity of the proposed development supports the established or emerging character of an area;
d. In order to form a cohesive,visualiy interesting and attractive appearance,the proposed development incorporates a substantiai number of
the following design elements:
❑ Changes in horizontal building planes;
0 Use of architecturai details such as columns,cornices,stringcourses,pilasters,porticos,balconies, railings,awnings,etc.;
❑ Variety in materiais,colors and textures;
❑ Distinctive fenestration patterns;
❑ Building stepbacks;and
O Distinctive roofs forms.
e. The proposed development provides for appropriate buffers,enhanced landscape design and appropriate distances between buildings.
_The proposed_develo�me��__�_Q����_.wi.th�th�_.ahnv.e.__ohj_e.c.t..i.�zes-.-._.__- -_--.___..._-
S:1Pianning DepartmentlP,pplication Forms\Development Review\2010 Forms updated with new Department name\Comprehensive infili Project(FLD)
5201 Q.docx
Page 3 of 8
--- ___ 1
E. STORMWATER PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteria
Manuai and 4-202.A.21)
O A STORMWATER NARRATNE MUST BE SUBMITTEQ W(TH ALL APPLICATIONS.AII appiications that involve addition
or modification of impervious surface, including buildings, must inciude a stormwater plan that demonstrates compliance with the City of
Clearwater 5torm Drainage Design Criteria manuai_A reduction in impervious surface area does not qualify as an exemption to this requirement
❑ If a plan is not required,the narrative shall provide an explanation as to why the site is exempt.
l:l At a minimum,the STORMWATER PLAN shall include the foilowing;
p Existing topography extending 50 feet beyond ali property lines;
p Proposed grading including finished flaor elevations of atl structures;
❑ AII adjacent streets and municipal storm systems;
D Proposed stormwater detention/retention area including top of bank,toe of slope and outlet control structure;
❑ A na«ative describing the proposed stormwater control plan including all calculations and data necessary to demonstrate compliance with
the City manuai.
� Proposed stormwater detention/retention area induding top of bank,toe of slope and outlet control structure;
� Signature and seal of Flonda Registered Professional Engineer on all plans and calculations.
❑ COPY OF PERMIT INQUIRY LETTER OR SOUTHWEST FLORiDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT (SWFWMD) PERMIT
SUBMITTAL(SWFWMD approval is required prior to issuance of City Buiiding Permit), if applicable
� ACKNOWLE�GEMENT OF STORMWATER PLAN REQUIREMENTS(Applicant must initial one of the following):
Stormwater plan as noted above is inciuded
Storrnwater plan is not requi�d and,ex�lanation narrative is attached. At a minimum, a grading plan and finished floor
X elevations shall be provided. arrativ No substantial modifications to impervious area, building area,
- pond size, etc. are proposed. Therefore, topographic information
was not required.
CAUTION — IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A STORMWATER PLAN
AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED,APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGIVIFICANT DELAY
MAY OCCUR.
if you have questions regarding these requirements,contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at(727)562-4750.
F. SUPPLEMENTAL SUBMiTTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 4-202.A)
�� SIGNED AND SEALED SURVEY(including fegal description of property)—One original and 14 copies;
❑ TREE SURVEY (including existing trees on site and within 25' of the adjacent site, by species, size (DBH 4" or greater), and location,
including drip lines and indicating trees to be removed)—please design around ihe existing trees;
❑ TREE fNVENTORY; prepared by a "certified arborisY': of all trees 4" DBH or greater, reflecting size, canopy (drip Iines) and condition of
such trees;
❑ LOCATION MAP OF THE PROPERTY;
O PARKING DEMAND STUDY in conjunction with a request to make deviations to the parking standards (ie. Reduce number of spaces).
Prior to the submittal of this application,the methodology ot such study shall be approved by the Community Development Coordinator and
shall be in accordance with accepted tra�c engineering principles. The findings of the study will be used in determining whether or not
deviations to the parking standards are approved;
(.� GRADING PLAN, as applicable;
❑ PRELIMINARY PLAT,as reqwred(Note: Building permits wiil not be issued until evidence of recording a final plat is provided};
❑ COPY OF RECORDED PLAT,as applicable;
S:\Planning Department�Appiication Forms\Development Review12010 Forms updated with new Department name�Comprehensive infiil Project(FLD)
5.2010.docx
Page4of8
— - -- ---
i
G. SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: {Section 4-202.A�
p SITE PLAN with the following information(not to exceed 24"x 36"):
index sheet referencing individual sheets included in package;
North arrow;
Engineering bar scale Iminimum scale one inch equals 50 feet),and date prepared;
Ali dimensions;
Footprint and size of all EXISTING buildings and structures;
Footprint and size of all PROPOSED buiidings and structures;
AI�required setbacks;
_ _..
All existing and proposed points of access;
All required sight triangles;
Identification of environmentally unique areas, such as watercourses, wetiands, tree masses, and specimen trees, including
description and location of understory,ground cover vegetation and wildiife habitats,etc;Location of all public and private easements;
Location of all street rights-of-way within and adjacent to the site;
Location of existing public and private utilities, including fire hydrants, storm and sanitary sewer lines, manholes and lift stations, gas
and water lines;
All parking spaces,driveways,foading areas and vehicular use areas;
Deplction by shading or crosshatching of aii required parking lot interior landscaped areas;
Location of ali solfd waste containers,recycling or trash handling areas and outside mechanical equipment and all required screening
{per Section 3-201(D}(i)and Index#701}:
Location of aii landscape material;
_
location of all onsite and offsite storm-water management facilities;
Location of all outdoor lighting fixtures;
____
Location of all existing and proposed sidewalks;and
Floor plan typicals of buildings for all Level Two approvals. A floor plan of each Floor is requfred for any parking garage requiring a
Levei Two approval.
❑ SITE DATA TABLE for existing,required,and proposed development,in written/tabular form: �2'.���,a�,
EXISTING REQUIRED PROPOSED
Land area in square feet and acres; 2'}��O� ---��36f/0.63 10,000/0.23_ ���66/0.63
��...`���..i C'V ICT11.1(`.J.....11:......n.1.- . .........__ ._ ........ ......_____.__........
rvwn�ci vi�nw�nvv unrcmny wnw, O O O
_.___.._ ____- _____... __.... ____._. _____ ._____ _____. .......__
Number of PROPOSEd dweliing units; Q � �
_ -- - _ _ __
_. ____
Gross floor area devoted to each use; 1,�(X5� 5 220
Parking spaces: total number, presented in tabular form with the
_ ___ _
__
number of required spaces; 25 23 __ ____ 25....__ __
Total paved area, including all paved parki�g spaces 8 driveways;
expressed in square feet 8 percentage of the paved vehicular area; 15,889SF 16,069SF
Official records book and page numbers of alI existing utility
__ __ _.... _ _ __ _ _ ___
easement; 12/29/15/59184/000/0013
_ _ __ _ __ _ _._
Building and structure heights; 16'-0" 25'-0" 16'-0"
Impermeable surFace ratio(I.S.R.),and (}!S'3 tJ` �'3 �,Q� O.�c7 Q,�' O,'}-�
___._. _ _ _ _ _
Fioor area ratio(F.A.R.)far alI nonresidential uses. �.1 J Q� Q•SS 0.19
_. ___ __..._ _.__. _
❑ REDUCED COLOR SITE PLAN to scale(8 Yz X 11);
� FOR DEVELOPMENTS OVER ONE ACRE,provide the foilowing additional information on site plan:
__ __._
One-foot contours or spot elevations on site;
Offsite elevations if required to evaluate the proposed stormwater management for the parcel;
All open space areas;
Location of ail earth or water retaining walis and earth berms;
Lot lines and buiiding lines(dimensioned);
_ _
Streets and drives(dimensioned);
Building and structural setbacks(dimensioned);
5tructural overhangs;
S:1Plannfng DepaRmentlApplication FormslDevelopment Review�2010 Forms updated with new Department namelComprehensive Infill Project(FLD)
5.2010.docx
Page 5 af 8
— �
H. LANQSCAPING PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-1102.A)
p LANDSCAPE PLAN with the following information(�ot to exceed 24"x 36"):
All exisUng and proposed sYructures;
___.._.
Names of abutting streets;
Drainage and retention areas includi�g swales,side slopes and bottom elevations;
Delineation and dimensions of aN required perimeter landscape buffers;
Sight visibiiity triangles,
delineation and dimensions of all parking areas including landscaping islands and curbing;
_ _
Existing trees on-site and immediately adjacent to the site,by species,size and locations,including driplines(as indicated on required
tree survey):
�ocation, size, and quantities of ali existing and proposed Iandscape materiais, indicated by a key relating to the plant
schedule;
Plant schedule wfth a key(symbol or label)indicating the size,description,specifications,quantities, and spacing requirements of ali
existing and proposed landscape materiais,including botanical and common names;
Typical planting details for trees, palms, shrubs and ground cover plants including instructions, sofl mixes, backfiliing, mulching and
protective measures;
Interior tandscaping areas hatched and/or shaded and labeled and interior landscape cov2rage, expressing in both square teet and
perce�tage covered;
Conditions of a previous development approval(e.g.conditions imposed by the Community Development Board);
Irrigation notes.
O REDUCED COLOR LANDSCAPE PLAN to scale(8'h X 11);
O COMPREHENSIVE EANDSCAPE PROGRAM application, as appiicable. Landscape associated with the Comprehensive Landscape
Program shali exceed minimum Code requirements to offset the areas where minimum Code wili not be met.
I. BUILDING ELEVATION PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A.23)
� BUILDING ELEVATION DRAWINGS—with the following information:
Ail sides of ail buiidings
Dimensioned
Colors(provide one full sized set of colored elevations)
Materiais
❑ REDUCED BUILDING ELEVATIONS—same as above to scale on 8 Yz X 11
J. SIGNAGE: (Division 19. SIGNS/Section 3-1806)
� All EXISTING freestanding and attached signs; Provide photographs and dimensions (area, height, etc.), indicate whether they wiil be
removed or to remain.
❑ AII PROPOSED freestanding and attached signs; Provide details including location, size, height, colors, materials and drawing;
freestanding signs shall include the street address(numerals)
D Comprehensive Sign Program appiication,as applicable(separate application and fee required).
�J Reduced signage proposal(8'/z X 11) (color),if submitting Comprehensive Sign Program appiication.
S\Planning DepartmentWppiication Forms\Development Review�2010 Forms updated with new Department name\Comprehensive Infill Project(FLDj
5.2010.docx
Page 6 of 8
_ t
K. TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY: (Section 4-202.A.13 and 4-8U1.C}
p include if required by the TrafFc Operations Manager or his/her designee or if the proposed development:
- Will degrade the acceptable level of service for any roadway as adopted in the Comprehensive Plan_
• WiII generate 1Q0 or more new vehicle directional trips per hour andlor 1000 or more new vehicle trips per day.
• W[il affect a nearby roadway segment and/or intersection wlth five{5)reportable accidents within the prior iwelve(12)month period or
that is an the City's annual Ifst of most hazardous intersections.
Trip generation shail be based on the most recent edition of the institute ot Transportation Engineer's(ITE)Trfp Generat Manual
The Traffic Impact Study must be prepared in accordance with a "Scoping Meeting" he�d with the Traffic Operations Manager and the
Planning Department's Development Review Manager or their designee(727-562-4750)
Refer to Section 4-801 C of the Community Development Code for exceptions to this requirement.
❑ Acknowledqement of traffic impact study requirements(Applicant must initiai one of the foliowingj:
Traffic Impact Study is included.The study must inciude a summary table of pre-and post-development levels of service for ali
roadway legs and each turning movement at ali intersections identified in the Scoping Meeting.
X Traffic Impact Study is not required.
_._ .. _
CAUTION — IF APPLlCATION REVIEW RESU�TS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A TRAFFIC IMPACT
STUDY AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND
SIGNlFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR.
If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at(727) 562-
4750
L. FIRE FLOW CALCULATIONS!WATER STUDY:
Provide Fire Flow Calculations.Water Study by a FIRE PROTECTION ENGINEER to assure an adequate water supply is available and to determine if
any upgrades are required by che developer due to the impact of this project. The water supply must be able to support the needs of any required fire
sprinkler,standpipe and/or fire pump. If a fire pump is required the water supply must be able to supply 150%of its rated capacity. Compliance with
the 2004 Florida Fire Prevention Code to include NFPA 13,MFPA 14, NFPA 20, NFPA 291,and MFPA 1 t42(Annex H)is required.
� Acknowledgement of fire flow calculations/water study requirements(Applicant must initial one of the foliowing):
Fire Flow Caiculations/Water Study is induded.
X Fire Flow CalcuiationslWater Study is not required.
___ _.
CAUTION — IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A FIRE FLOW
CALCULATIONS/ WATER STUDY AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE
RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR.
If yau have questions regarding these requirements,contact the City Fire Prevention Department at(727)562-4334.
M. SIGNATURE:
I,the undersigned,acknowledge that all representations made STATE OF FLORIDA,COUNTY OF PINE S
in this application are true and accurate to the best of my Sw rn to and subscribed before me this � day of
knowledge and authorize Ciry representatives to visit and ��-t��2tr ,A .20`L�to me and/or by
photograph the property described in this application. ,who is rsonally known has
produced /"
enti ic tion.
�
. __..._ r ..___. ........_ _ ..._.. .. .____ f .._._._
Signatur roperty owner or representative Not p lic,
My co issi ires:
;�,...,:,. ,�asow uru�s
�_ �1'COMMISSIO(y �F
S:\Planning DepartmentW,ppiication Forms�Development Review12010 Forms updated with � �� ���j�nen��C�mpre�2tt5?��iil roject(FLD)
5.2010.docx °���� 2015
Page 7 of 8
. , �
J. AFFIDAVIT TO AUTHdRtZE AGENT:
Provide names of al!property owners on deed—PRINT full names.
�`�v�.. V • ` ``�` v+�+.. .
_ .. . ... _...._ .. _ ._..._. ...
?. That(i am/we are)the owner(s)and record title holder(s)of the fol!owing described property(address or general location):
�.1��-��-� �- c�\�.���-�e-a--,�"I -_3�.�5-?-f _ _
_ _ __ . .._ __ __
3. That this propeRy constitutes the property for which a request for a (describe request)
��.-2�r..�.��.�c-- __�\_.__�..\��i`n-e4� ..�.E'�J.���__---...__
4. That the undersigned(haslhave)appointed and(does/do)appoint: .
� �Z._iC __ . ���(_�.�J��o� G.�Cf�L. _ _.��,,�--1��� ___ _ __._.
as(his!their)agent(s)to execute any petitions or other documen±s necessary to affect such petition;
5. That this affidavit has been executed to induce the City of Clearwater,Fiorida to consider and act on the above described property;
6. That site visits to ihe property are necessary by City represerrtatives in order to process this appiication and the owner authorizes City
representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application;
7. That(Ilwe),the undersigned authority,he e@y certify that ihe foregoing is true and correct.
t��,�1�9 _.f15�.... ���f?���t O�S d�. . t��.�...1.-�._.. . _. _ .___.._
Pr rty dwner `�� Pro y Owner
_ ......._.. .. _.. . ._....... _......._...,.._. . . _ _. .._. .. _.._._ .._. .._.. . .._..._..
..
_.
Propert�•Owner Property Owner
STATE OF FLORIDA,
COUNTY OF PINELLAS
Before me the undersigned,an officer duly commissioned by the laws of the State of Florida,on this �Ia� day of
�.-� �J /� �n
���,r' ��l personally appeared ��� M, M yW� who having been first duly sworn
Deposes and says that he/she fuily understands the contents of the affidavit that helshe signed.
JODIE C/►MOVA �----� �
Not�Y PubNc,Steree ot Fio�ida
My COmm.Expket Aup.31.2014 ��.� _ l��,..��' _
No.EE 22375 _ _._ ..........
Notary Pubiic Signature
Notary Seal/Stamp My Commission Expires:� �.� z�`�
I_ ....._._ _ .... ._....
�
S:\Planning DepartrnenriApplication FortnslDevetopment Review�20?0 Forms updated with new Department namelComprehensive Infili Project(FLD)
5.2010.docx
Pa9e 8 of 8
L4
Z
Animal Healt�i Clinic �?
N
Clearwater, �L ;
Flexible Development package
o��,�
U w�,a,
a�Y-e t/3"
�} . .. .... ..._ .. __ _"_ __"'" _......_... ... .__ O _ _..__.__. ...__._ . ____... ,_._.__._ _.._. ...__. __..._._ ....__. ..... . __. CO x
I PERIYLiNf r ,�\ io/t0/ti
i � __ _- - ��_ - - - - - - - -
/ "•
� I � / �.
�o�._,. � �
� � _ _ _ ____ _ _ � , , .�.:
II ��-.. � .-_..___I / liev.l{ftuv.DaccrlUWn
, , , � � i �
E.��S'��N0.5�„0��,SpTq�RY � . I ,
I II � . �'10E90GA&f fEFrG�� � . J
� � %
� � f , �
� � � � � � ��� � '� ��� �
� � � i �� �
,
, � � ,
, , q
� �' � � �� � ��o d �#�
0
" � §�
��. I � � � � _ — � _ _ � r— '�, ,�` �
m , , �,,. , �
�
i �L= _�-i , �
0
. W �,
i�,� , ,,- � � - � --1-�- ` � "�� _
-------------- --- ---- -=_
I� � � `�
�� � �4
� � � �
� � \
i �� i % � �� � -�.,
. ,
I I o' FfFEA 10 clNt ENGWEERWG :'�... eC
I DRANINGS fOR SIIE � �
�I I �� CONSiRUCTOU PL�N�NO /
L�NOSCAPE PIAH. �
� i U
I �
I_ � --_.. . _--- _____ ___ _ o�� �i
I I � I _ ____ _ - -- '�-� Q
_ ._ _
_
__ ____ ____
- - - - - - - - --'�.-- - - - - - - - — .-_, � -
! PROPEFTY E
I /� � �� �
� J '� �t
� ¢ _. __- ¢3a /' _..___.. ._____._ __—_.__ ..____ ._ ___._— -_.....__._ <�. ; � N �F
„ .._. . . ._._ __._.. ____ .—_'____ _.._._.____ _._ / �"
_ .._ _. _.. . .. � Y`
Q VICINITY MAP / � � ~�
SITE PLAN �
� � scuc:i-io-o� �� �Orawin9 Title:
t � D COYER SHEET
� .� .. .. �.SITE PLAN
� ''_ ' �oxN��oxwEwG��c<, w�o�o PROViDEO � n r—� s a���Ka�����a
; _ T??--T`—' DRAWING INDEX ��a�ea� ,�;a�aa
5 �.�.� � . � s c .rrL .. -. s4a a°oaSMwJ._ 1L34?_ o io so no - -- --.__
e � o so o� z]..c, ._ � -- JOB#: 11041
� ' 1B-cu -S'RS ._ N� .,. �nP�c�^� � AOUl COVER_S1TE PL4N INOIX_NOTES • • _
� . �F�_ ��`_ _ �i Li _ _. i�m= m��n noo e Loi—e — Drawn: EDGUMG
Y �i ., ,�� , �, .�� � ssre ... _.g',� __ Ls .. _ ...�. . .. � � Checked:
g 0 WBLE _
., � RES -� R_ __ ._ __. CNIL ...— ..__ -__. _
_— _
� k� '�.. 5 ..�.. O.B ..._ fis... ... ,_. CI GENERALNOTE'� • —_" ._ �SGdl9; a511031Bd
$ . :.r ___ ._ _._" _ _ _
p reneixc _-_ .za __. as__ _- _ _..— __ .__ .___ Sheal
� PROJECTLOGATION `i NO DS NTEICONTROLPIAN � _�._
___—' _'" ....
; -----{N� , ,=��EO�SO�a,�- . A001
$ , 2 l0 4 �5 1 of 7 sheets
I�
�
Z
�
-
�� �,� �, , N
� �� ^ , � W
�� � � i �, yd ; u
ii��i�� �'�i�)�I �Q a ���' � a�Vi��
�'�V� �y,� ��i'�!x^ �
a�.'�:r;°
.. .µ ,�..:� }. :r ,. � .
a.�. aua�.�afmn�
. . ,. . �. �� . m rzreeesru
n, . ..,w r...rnenc�z
�� A � �l�
� ��
�EXISTING SOUTH ELEVATION �EXISTING WEST ELEVATION �EXISTING NORTH ELEVATION �1 EXISTING EAST ELEVATION ��� ��
i i0 SC��E pi ta SC��E `� Oi iD SG�E Y 1 10 sG1F
5
Aar.k Rev.Oeocrlptlon
PEfliNCLfREOf BNLWMG���uE�xwxo P[RiMElEREOF BIII�OINC��rv�[nnouuo
-a�iui u ii E%iSiING ROOi SM�N0.E5 TO REUIJN ENiSTNG R001'sHwctES i0 REMUN
P i cMCP VXOV(5E0 PAYYAR4r iLAC�OE COLOx P v ox
4 SIpRE�RONi SYSiEMS LL SiqiEfRONi SYS1E45 �WR.1GE DOOR i0^NAiCH a BU�WNG CO�OH�- Q Q
uxrt0 xNiE uu o xrvilE tnNO a u�r �• €$J �
��� v�� �
����' �I s�� �I�a
m
! � o�
�� .,,s� . ,�;�
� �ti .��
.. � .�.,
� �
�PROPOSED SOUTH ELEVATION �PROPOSED WEST ELEVATION �PROPOSED NORTH ELEVATION �PROPOSED EAST ELEVATION V �
„ o,.oK�E �
o�i
�
� Q
� � o
HDiE: 0 i5 iu PRWRE55 YMLLE SUBAUIIU PA[rtnGE i5 Bfluc r !� y LL
PRCP�RED�COLORS ME 51NhE5 Of PROPOSED&lilOwG COLORS.OWNEH i0 C ^
Q COUP�EiE PAiHTNG�N S.�Mf COLCR SCHEwE�5 iuMCniEO.�b ExiEProx '� � C-
COt�SiRUtiiON SH�LL Bf PMT Of E%LEFIOR uPGFnDES
a
� w ��
� o�awi�rme:
� - BUILDIN6
� ELEVATIONS
�
E
Y
9
� .IOB N: 11 041
Drawn: EDG/JMG
Checked:
� Dete: 10/03/11
�Scale: as rwteA
$ Sheat
<
A100
8 1 2 L 4 i5 2 m T s^�,m
a
i `
TREE TABLE ` �
,.,,,� rwavm'„°�ar��wm°E`�aiHnro�N��w:w��uN�w,�w.�nwre�.� ��'�,, YJ
�x�won�a�cexree.u�^�oo
�( ���s�c.���,P�,o�.�.���Pmw�TMEP�.n���� W
�< ���;�
���<i��� ,u,,rc, � aan��.�„�.,�,�,��, •
,. < , �yz"�:,w ��„��
r :; -� �bti;.�W �n,�� a
� �p � �����
o��,o �,o.
, ��o��,�na �t�; �«, °""�'�.��,�.wEE
�1"., SCALC�i�3p• � I�Elue¢Paimf�nurvqul �Wt G
t\ � H
It�aW�1'1r��(LAUhbC�'� � � �NWfMMt
rNil�i�ln�n�w td r �;, ( �' - . wxw wrnwi�.s�e� o � ,
i�Vu�yUVp� �`: .
��a�G/ ����,�� , � sreaeoP.,reAwow�m�r��nm..,sxe.e�,uw�rN� o.
�,� \ �!N UNh i e+rewxe�rw�cH¢oevew+uuuduwou�es��w�.
1 111 \.'� . . /y � � �/(
\ n �
M t �'htES � /�� ��\. I FI �+ Y'�� �sormf�ssuu�cnanv.vuwvawrxoFnmwm r,
�-
H L''G IO � � uM1tJ }
et�'�.� f���_ nP
Ly')l�F �� _ �..��n.�� 5
��. CITY OF CLEARWATER GENERAL '"�°"�°°Oea°�b°on
� � �� ' LANDSCAPE NOTES
ie M+t��� U.�,', NrJHIION JI �l- f�\
� m>>r�,�a kis : \ �...E�om�
��,h � �\ �.,»�.., e e
. . rJ"', �V��� ��,��,,.,�,...��.,��.,� �� � � �
\� ��LL q��
� �` � ��� �u.��.�.����«�„��.�.a.�.e o� ��o�� 3��
� .
� „
� ' �w���
� .. �,y �, a,��.»�w ��.a,��.
n n _;oNr .,.� � ��,� �\ �.�.,�..�.�...,,�.a.. �
if nm)FL,[t, � ,� .ronia . w. �� .
r ti ��C �+t � sr����, ��
� \ �
��;� ' �r'�� �\�;v� n��.
�� � � �� ,..o.G.,�,d.,���,.�,o
,� , � �..�»�„�.�, .,�
, � .�._�o. �
;�,N� ti�'�'� ����a ,���,°�..°,�... ��..�.ro.�E�..� - �
� � U
� ,�� �� �� �,._�; �����°�,�� � �
� ,, . ...a,�..�.,�w,K,
� ,
, o�.�,�:,��: ` �
� uAk�, ,.�,���,�uro�»���„�, _ �
��, .. �
°»��a,�� °
. , o.,
� �,����� � � �� � � �,.���.�,»��.�e��,�m�,����,���,�s�t�, � �
:a.
, ;
�r� Uy; ,� , ,. ,, y _ e �
�
� ,�s�_ �„ ,� ,� �d9�,4aw �
a _ ". � � �:
�:�� �„�.�;� ,- � -� •..., � � .
,�.„<,. ��s�. - ; A
� �ss , ��, � =
� � , � '° � ° � „ � � H `
� _
-.;-�-, � -- _'�-- , �.__ �,
�� A �.*�. .��.i�a�w��. � �. Drewing Titla:
� '
' � � . DREW STREET ; ue+oscnaeauN
_ I _
_. ._ � ��m�� nrv,., ..._ ,
u✓/ Y
`r" '�� �JOB 1{: 11 091
'� `'Drawn: DR
'?Checked: GO
; Data: 10/03/11
p Scele:SEE PLAN
ENGINEERING � S//���'�
..xl:LiUMt-FtMiONNFNlN \I�
eoo sMFVENUE N..9UIiE98T.PEiER6&Nq.fl?si0i
PENO�BNIONOEMMINPE FqHONERia4]bv0o 0� 6hB816
, C FIGnIENO.�eitB
_ _ . _ __--__ _ _
w. . � : . , Owner's Policy of Title Insurance
` �r�tAmer�e� Title ISSUED BY
_:���
First American Titte Insurance Company
POLICY NUMBER
Sch ed u I e A 5011412-0006816e
Name and Address of Titie Insurance Company:
FIRST AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY, 1 First American Way, Santa Ana, California
92707
�gent File Number: Fifth Third/ Animal Health
FAST File Number: 2037-2522486
Address Reference: 2118 Drew Street, Clearvvater, Florida
Amount of Insurance: $350,000.00
Date of Policy: June 7, 2011 at 9:39 A,M.
1. Name of Insured:
Leichgeld, �LC
2. The estate or interest in the Land that is insured by this policy is:
Fee Simple
3. Titie is vested in:
Leichgeld, LLC, a FVorida limited liability company
4. The Land referred to in this palicy is descri�d as follows:
See Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof
Zimmerman, Kiser nd Sutcl� e P.A,
sy;
Authorized Co n ignature n, Kiser and Sutcliffe P.A.
This Scheduie A valid only when Schedule B is attached)
—_____
..--. �. ._.�_ '._,�_. _cr,u_ r......,..,,.,..,,, ;C_17_tl�l (�.,itfi Glnririm m�fiifir�afinncl �
, • �
+ ti � t
' '� ISSUE�BY
� �t�t A��r�le8n �tle First American Title I�surance Company
,�,(iL+�' �C}LICY NUMBER
` 5011412-Q006816e
Exhibit A
Agent File Number: Fifth Third ( Animal Health
FAST File Number: 2037-2522486
The iand referred to herein befow is situated in the County of Pineilas, State of Florida, and described as foilows:
�"'�at part of Lot 1 of MOSELL ACRES, according to the Plat thereof as recorded in Pfat Book 24, Page{s) 70, of the Pub{ic
Records af PINELLAS County, Florida described as foilows: From the Northeasteriy corne� of said Lot 1, run thence South
36°07'26" East, along the Easteriy line of said Lot 1, 170.0 feet for the ROINT OF SEGINNING; Thence continue South
36°07'26" East, along said Easterly line, 313.39 feet to the Northerly right-of-way line of Drew Street, thence North �
89°25'27" West, along said Northerly right-af-way line, 123.47 feet; thence North 36°07'26" West, 239.60 feet; thence
North 53°52`34" East, 99.0 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING.