FLD2011-08028; 740 ELDORADO AVE; MODANO RESIDENCE �
740 ELDORADO AVE
Date Received: 8/31/2011 1 :51 :00 PM
Modano Residence
ZONING DISTRICT: Low Medium Density
Residential
LAND USE: Residential Urb an (7.5 du/acre)
ATLAS PAGE: 249A
PLANNER OF RECORD:
PLANNER: Kevin Nurnberger, Planner III
CDB Meeting Date: November 1 S,2011
Case Number: ELD2011-08028
Agenda Item: D.4
Owner/Applicant: Michael Thomas Modano
Agent: Chancey Design Partnershi�
Address: 740 Eldorado Avenue
CITY OF CLEARWATER
PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
STAFF REPORT
GENERAL INFORMATION:
REQUEST: Flexible Development approval for the construction of a new
single-family detached dwelling within the Low Medium Density
Residential (LMDR) District with a lot area of 6,534 square feet, a
lot width of 60 feet, a reduction in the front (East} setback from 25
feet to 10 feet (to building), and a reduction to the rear (west)
setback from 10 feet to zero feet (to Costal Construction Control
Line) for an in-ground swimming pool and deck at existing grade
as a Residential Infill Project under the provisions of Community
Development Code Section 2-204.E.
ZONING: Low Medium Density Residential (LMDR) District
FUTURE LAND USE Residential Urban(RU)
CATEGORY:
PROPERTY USE: Current: Detached Dwelling
Proposed: Detached Dwelling
EXISTING North: Low Medium Residential (LMDR) District
SURROUNDING Detached Dwellings
ZONING AND USES:
South: Low Medium Residential (LMDR) District
Detached Dwellings
East: Low Medium Residential (LMDR) District
Detached Dwellings
West: Preservation (P) District
Water
ANALYSIS:
Site Location and Existing Conditions:
The 0.15 acre subject property is located on the west side of Eldorado Avenue approximately 125
feet south of Bohenia Circle South. The property is presently developed with a detached dwelling
which is going to be demolished. The properties to the north, south and east are zoned Low
Medium Density Residential (LMDR) District and are developed with detached dwellings. Land
to the west is zoned Preservation (P)District and is the Gulf of Mexico.
Community Development Board—November 15,2011
FLD2011-08028—Page 1 of 6
Development Proposal:
The proposal is to redevelop the subject property with single-family detached dwelling. A
similar request on the subject property was approved by the Community Development Board in
2010; however, the time period of the Development Order has expired requiring a review of the
project through the Flexible Development application. Back then as now, this request is being
processed as a Residential Infill Project due to the requested rear (west) setback reduction to the
Coastal Construction Control Line (CCCL) for pool and decking. The pool and decking location
has shifted from the southern partion of the rear year towards the northern end of the property
from the previous request, but does not affect the proposal or request. The main structure will
maintain a 20-foot setback from the CCCL which is consistent with both houses immediately
adjacent to the subject property. It will have relatively the same footprint as the previously
approved project; however, the buildings square footage will slightly increase as the new
proposal moves the side walls closer to the side setback which results in an increase from 2,500
square feet to 2,900 square feet. Nevertheless, as pursuant to Section 3-905.C.2 of the
Community Development Code (CDC), any requests to modify setback requirements from the
CCCL shall be considered through a Level Two development process.
The development proposal's compliance with the various development standards of the CDC is
discussed below.
Impervious Surface Ratio (ISRZ Pursuant to the Countywide Plan Rules and CDC Section 2-
201.1, within the Residential Urban (RU) land use category, the allowable ISR is 0.65. The site
is in compliance as an ISR of 0.55 is proposed.
Densitv: Pursuant to the Countywide Plan Rules and CDC Section 2-201.1, within the
Residential Urban (RU) land use category, the allowable density is 7.5 units per acre. As the lot
area is 6,600 square feet (0.15 acres), one dwelling unit is allowed and therefore, the proposed
density is in compliance.
Minimum Lot Area: Pursuant to Table 2-204 of the CDC, for Residential Infill Projects, there is
no minimum lot area. The lot area of the subject property is 6,600 square feet which exceeds the
detached dwelling minimum standard of 5,000 square feet found in Table 2-202.
Minimum Lot Width: Pursuant to Table 2-204 of the CDC, for Residential Infill Projects,there is
no minimum lot width. The subject property lot width is 60 feet which exceeds the detached
dwelling minimum standard of 50 feet found in Table 2-202.
Minimum Setbacks: Pursuant to Table 2-204 of the CDC, within the LMDR District, Residential
Infill Projects may have a front setback between 10—25 feet, a side setback between zero to five
feet, and a rear setback between zero to 15 feet. The proposal includes a front (east) setback of
10 feet and a rear (west) setback of zero feet. The building will also be setback 5 feet on both the
north and south side setbacks. The development is compliant with the above referenced
requirements.
The reduction in front and rear setbacks allows for a development consistent with the
surrounding and emerging development pattern. The existing detached dwellings immediately
Community Development Board—November 15,2011
FLD2011-08028—Page 2 of 6
adjacent to the subject property to the north and south are setback 10 feet or less from the east
property lines. With regard to the rear setback reduction, the development pattern along
Eldorado is moving from typical ranch style Florida homes toward larger homes occupying a
greater portion of lot area than the existing hames. In addition, a site visit and review of aerial
photographs show tl�at several existing waterfront detached dwellings in the vicinity of the
subject property appear to nave zero foot structural and building setbacks from the CCCL.
Therefore, the rear setback reduction to provide a typical amenity of a pool and decking for a
beachfront detached dwelling is justified and consistent with the emerging development pattern.
Maximum Buildin� Height: Pursuant to Table 2-204 of the CDC, for Residential Infill projects,
the maxirnum building height in the LMDR District is 30 feet. The building height of the
detached dwelling will have a height of 29.1 feet as measured from the Base Flood Elevation to
midpoint of pitched roof,which is consistent with the above.
Minimum Off-Street Parkin�: Pursuant to Table 2-204 of the CDC, for Residential Infill
projects, two parking spaces are required. The proposal is to provide two parking spaces for the
dwelling, which is consistent with the above.
Mechanical Equipment: Pursuant to CDC Section 3-903.H.1, air conditioning and similar
mechanical equipment is exempt from the side and rear setback requirements, but such
equipment must be screened from view from streets and adjacent property. Outside condensing
units for air conditioners as well as pool equipment will be placed adjacent to the side of the
dwelling. Compliance with screening requirements will be reviewed at time of building permit
submittal.
Utilities: Pursuant to CDC Section 3-912, all utility facilities including individual distribution
lines shall be installed underground unless such undergrounding is impractical. This proposal
will comply with this requirement.
Solid Waste: The dwelling unit will be provided a black barrel for solid waste disposal which
will be stored exterior to the dwelling. CDC Section 3-201.D.1 requires these black barrels to be
screened from view from streets and adjacent properties. Provisions for walls, fences or other
appropriate screening materials will be reviewed at time of building permit submittal.
Code Enforcement Analysis: There are no outstanding Code Enforcement issues associated
with the subject property.
Community Development Board—November 15,2011
FLD2011-08028—Page 3 of 6
COMPLIANCE WITH STANDARDS AND CRITERIA: The following table depicts the
consistency of the detached dwelling subdivision proposal with the standards as per CDC Tables
2-201.1 and 2-204:
Standard Proposed Consistent Inconsistent
Density 7.5 du/ac(1 unit) 6.6 du/ac(1 unit) X
ISR 0.65 0.56 X
Minimum Lot Area N/A 6,600 square feet X'
Minimum Lot Width N/A 6a feet X�
Minimum Setbacks Front: 10-25 feet East: 10 feet X�
Side: 0-5 feet North: 5 feet X
South: 5 feet X
Rear: 0- 10 feet West: Zero feet X'
Maximum Height 30 feet 29.1 feet X
Minimum Off-Street 2 spaces per dwelling unit 2 spaces X
Parkin
COMPLIANCE WITH FLEXIBILITY CRITERIA: The following table depicts the
consistency of the development proposal with the Flexibility criteria as per CDC Section 2-204.E
(Residential Infill Project):
Consistent Inconsistent
l. The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development is X
otherwise impractical without deviations from one or more of the following: intensity
or other development standards.
2. The development of the parce]proposed for development as a residential infill project X
will not materially reduce the fair market value of abutting properties.
3. The uses within the residential infill project are otherwise permitted in the district. X
4. The uses within the residential infill project are compatible with adjacent land uses. X
5. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a residential infill project X
will upgrade the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development.
6. The design of the proposed residential infill project creates a form and function which X
enhances the communiTy character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for
development and the City of Clearwater as a whole.
7. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height, off=street parking, access X
or other development standards are justified by the benefits to community character
and the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of
Clearwater as a whole.
Community Development Board—November 15,2011
FLD2011-08028—Page 4 of 6
COMPLIANCE WITH GENERAL STANDARDS FOR LEVEL TWO APPROVALS: The
following table depicts the consistency of the development proposal with the General Standards
for Level Two Approvals as per CDC Section 3-913:
Consistent Inconsistent
1. The proposed development of the land will be in harznony with the scale, bulk, X
coverage,density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located.
2. The proposed development will not hinder or diseourage development and use of X
adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof.
3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the heaith or safety of persons X
residing or working in the neighborhood.
4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. X
5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the X
immediate vicinity.
6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, X
acoustic and olfacto and hours of o eration im acts on ad�acent ro erties.
SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION:
The Development Review Committee (DRC) reviewed the application and supporting materials
at its meeting of October 6, 2011, and deemed the development proposal to be legally sufficient
to move forward to the Community Development Board (CDB), based upon the following:
Findin�s of Fact: The Planning and Development Department, having reviewed all evidence
submitted by the applicant and requirements of the Community Development Code, finds that
there is substantial competent evidence to support the following findings of fact:
1. That the 0.15 acres is located on the west side of Eldorado Avenue approximately 125 feet
south of Bohenia Circle South;
2. That the property is developed with a detached dwelling which is to be demolished;
3. That the proposal is to redevelop the subject property with a single-family detached dwelling;
4. That the proposal includes a reduction of the rear setback from the Coastal Construction
Control Line (CCCL) of 10 feet to zero feet where zero feet is allowable;
5. That pursuant to CDC Section 3-905.C3, any requests to modify setback requirements from
the CCCL shall be considered through a Level Two development process;
6. That the proposal includes a reduction of the front (east) setback from and 25 to 10 feet
where 10 feet is allowable;
7. That the building height of the detached dwelling will have a height of 29.1 feet as measured
from the Base Flood Elevation to midpoint of pitched roof; and
8. That there are no outstanding Code Enforcement issues associated with the subject property.
Conclusions of Law: The Planning and Development Department, having made the above
findings of fact,reaches the following conclusions of law:
1. That the development proposal is consistent with the Standards as per Tables 2-201.1 and 2-
204 of the Community Development Code;
2. That the development proposal is consistent with the Flexibility criteria as per Section 2-
204.E of the Community Development Code; and
3. That the development proposal is consistent with the General Standards for Level Two
Approvals as per Section 3-913 of the Community Development Code.
Community Development Board—November 15,2011
FLD2011-08028—Page 5 of 6
Based upon the above,the Planning and Development Department recommends APPROVAL of
the Flexible Development application for the construction of a new single-family detached
dwelling within the Low Medium Density Residential (LMDR) District with a lot area of 6,534
square feet, a lot width of 60 feet, a reduction in the front (East) setback from 25 feet to 10 feet
(to building), and a reduction to the rear (west) setback from 10 feet to zero feet (to Costal
Construction Control Line) for an in-ground swimming pool and deck at existing grade as a
Residential Infill Project under the provisions of Community Deveiopment Code Section 2-
204.E with the following conditions of approval:
Conditions of Approval:
1. That the final design and colors of the detached dwelling be consistent with the elevations
approved by the CDB;
2. That prior to the issuance of any building permits, a separate right-of-way permit must be
approved for the installation of the brick paver drive apron;
3. That there are no obstructions in the waterfront site visibility triangle;
4. That pool and deck not be constructed higher than 12 inches above existing grade;
5. That vehicles cannot be parked in the driveway blocking the pedestrian access to the concrete
sidewalk;
6. That prior to the issuance of any permits, the applicant shall comply with all requirements of
the Engineering Department;
7. That black barrels stored exterior to the dwelling and outdoor mechanical equipment
including air conditioning and pool equipment be screened from view from adjacent streets
and properties; and
8. That all utility facilities, including but not limited to gas, water, wastewater collection,
electric, telephone and television cables, except major transmission lines and transformers,
� shall be located underground,prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy.
.
Prepared by Planning and Development Department Staff:
evin W. berger, Planner III
Attachments:Location Map;Aerial Map;Zoning Map;Existing Surrounding Uses Map;and Photographs of Site and Vicinity
S:IPlanning DepartmentlC D BIFZEX(FLD)IPending casesl Up for the next CDBIEIdorado 0740-Detached Dwelling(LMDR)-
2011.xz-KWM740 Eldorado Staff RepOTt-2011.C10CX
Community Development Board—November I5,2011
FLD2011-08028—Page 6 of 6
Kevin W.Nurnberger
100 S Myrtle Avenue
Clearwater,FL 33756
727-562-4567
kevin.number er cr�nvctearwater.com
PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE
Planner III March 2011 to present
Planner II October 2010 to March 2011
City of Clearwater, Clearwater, Florida
Duties include performing the technica] review and preparation of staff reports for various land
development applications, the organization of data and its display in arder to track information and
provide status reports, and making presentations to various City Boards and Committees.
Planner
County of York, Yorktown, Virginia 2007 to 2009
Reviewed residential, commercial and mixed use development site plans to ensure compliance with
planning, zoning, subdivision, historic preservation, and environmental standards as well as design
criteria, specifications, regulations, codes and ordinances. Led pre-application meetings with residents,
neighborhood organizations, contractors, and developers regarding future projects which included state
and local government agencies.
Site Assistant
Gahan and Long Ltd, Belfast, Northern Ireland 2006 to 2007
Enforced Article 3 of the Planning Order (NI) with land owners, developers and district councils on
procedures relating to archaeological and built heritage remains on proposed development sites. On site
assistant to project manager during the archeological process throughout the pre-development stage.
Development Planner
Versar Inc, Fort Story/Fort Eustis, Virginia 2005 to 2006
Developed survey strategies for the Cultural Resource Manager by reviewing local and state planning
documents, the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Preservation Planning on Federal installations,
the Virginia Department of Historic Resources, the Virginia Department of Transportation plan, and
Virginia Power's public utility plan in the predevelopment stages of new development and building
expansion projects to ensure protection of historic properties.
City Planner
City Planning Commission, New Orleans, Louisiana 2000 to 2005
Primary subdivision planner assisting applicants throughout the subdivision process in accordance with
the zoning and subdivision regulations of the City of New Orleans. Reviewed various zoning and
conditional use applications. Prepared and presented staff reports to the City Planning Commission and
Board of Zoning Adjustments.
EDUCATION
University of New Orleans,LA
MA Urban and Regional Planning(2004)
State University of New York at Buffalo,NY
BA Anthropology(1999)
w a
,fessamne t Guava t ' �,
U � c `�a'
IQPLING p(,qZq ? �
�
�> Z
a �'A (n
QGARDENIA ST �
� aD D�p
�yFN�q VERBENA
�� � �
p MANGO ST p
PROJECT o s
SITE W D� W �
�N�N�P a c�
� m iRis
XU `iFN._ �r
a �
W �
� ASTER
� �
O O ACACIA ST �
� 0 O �
J s°e^� sr � a
� �}'
rn CAMBRIA j �
v � Q T
y
IDLEWILD �
GIE�NDA E ROYAL AY � �.�p.Rg�
HEIL 00 �
O s"Y z�
'4VA�ON n N � o
�_J W O
KENDALL �'�"�a z �
C� ❑� v �
BF1Y ESPLANADE
�oc,arioN
Owner: Modano Case: FLD2011-08028
Site: 740 Eldorado Ave Property Size: 0.15 acres
PIN: 05-29-15-54666-003-0030 Atlas Page: 249A
780 781 � 765 �
, �
776 779 770 763 y y
c
775 ? 2,°
770 764 757
763
771 76
760 � 761
753 �
766 765 C
756 � 757
m 755
760 761 754 751 n
754 m 751
756 75� 750
750 745
755 �
� �A�IR S � ,6 �4,
o BoNEN �4, �40
� 742 737
750 n 737 736
� iR►s sr
� 745 738 733 734
744 n
O732 729 ,`�
P m 743 732 ✓�j�_�` 730 727
�-
L �z9 sr
736 726
O a 725
U �
734 735 n 725
724 Z 724
X n �z3
723
w 1'� 721 720
� 730 725 718 � 719 716
� n 721
O �2, �,2 m �,> >,2
� �,o �„
�20 �a9 �a8
� 709
f�1 707
�•J 716 719 706 705 704
70
�1z 705
O1 700 703
710 a� 701 � �
701 u�
ACAC/A ST ACACIA ST
708
N N n W W
o� � t� y� V ? v
ZONING
Owner: Modano Case: FLD2011-08028
Site: 740 Eldorado Ave Property Size: 0.15 acres
PIN: 05-29-15-54666-003-0030 Atlas Page: 249A
7HO N 6 7 ___ 1
e e s
� 776 779 ��770 7635 a � � —
�
" y 5
8 775 8 ��764 75 �5 9 ? z a
770 —
J 7715 '11 3 �ds 7B1
V O �SO �� _
cVj 766 765 �
a 13 756 _ _Z_ � 757
w 4 1
� 760 761 14 754 751
J 3 3 754
751
� 2 758 7572 _15 750 6 �
C 745
O ' v 755� 1e S ,�� � m
Z o ��R a �a
o n BOHEN�A 7413 14 �ao m
U � 742 8 73
� 750 � 12 Z 9 738
N 5 � ��
z —
�
p 744 m 745 733 i to 734
U 4 �o i3 32 72
Q 743 732 °� ✓Fj_ �� 730 �o
� 3 9 14 �F�
a � 729 sr
� z 736 739 8 �s 726 n s �
U
O Z
U � 734 735 � 1216 724 n 725 � 9 724
X � 723
W $ s n "C 72� 13 �� 720
C 731 720
G 730 5 18 718 m 719 5 1t 718
� a
Q 2 721 4 is 712 717 4 tz 712 �
J � NO eo 711 3 13 60
� s �zo �os �os
(�r �° �oe �° �o�
5 718 719Z 2 704 705 Z 14704
712 13
4 701� 2 22 sa � 16 15700 �
23 N 701 M �
3 2 �
�oa �
� ACACIA ST
2 04'� I N I 1 I N M �F � g
EX ISTI NG CONDITIONS
Owner: Modano Case: FLD201 1-08028
Site: 740 Eldorado Ave Property Size: 0.15 acres
PIN: 05-29-15-54666-003-0030 Atlas Page: 249A
. _
t� �#� e� ? , �
, ; � ,�'�•,:��:i-� � '4� � �::,.I � � �����.,�,..�,�J�� 1 �
,' �l � �
��,: � `^°'• ' — � �, "°' � ( "�' "' '���„ " a
�� ,Y ''� r , h_.._ �,,',,� , z _ 4'
: , . � :�� c ��_ , +�� ��, �.�' '�� z \
�` m � — ' n� - s:" k" ,l��'�, °,�' '��'
�� .. �� �I ��'1,. ,�,.��`�1 '� A� -r`:
5" °�
, � �
x. ` '� �. �` '. , z •°,
;`" �
��
�,
���
_.�.
_
�_ C"� �a�
..v � ��� t.' {ti - � a�����, c� ,1� �� v -, ��i iz •e .�,�
�2 `� .� • �. l.� �,,. 4h �j,���. .'q��,,q�•�,.� e •r
R� � ; � � p
ri. � �� _ . � ,�� � �
, .ra � '�. � f�->.�� , �� '�ti~ .�.
��d`m '``" �' I ,�:e�-�' �: ���,�, �' �� +'� .t
� $�' ,�; _ � �\� � �,
�. : �,,� '� .. 4 �� �I„ �. k $'" ` �� `+� �.. � �i " -
,��e� : : S.v9 � ,`r \�y. R .
i+. � x,y,.v,c r ` '� ���. ��lp � 'a�' � .� . .� �L,
�� A �r �� � � d �.� ��
r 4.c�it _ '�{ � Y� __ ,_. �r''];y� � �
� ` -;.i ��9. �:j�� �� yf � Jg�Y ; � „*g„
� � e�S:N-� t. 1 ��" � .��\{�- �'' �.
� .;i �,w -��!�, { b , a� ��: �` F.
. .��r F � "` �� � �� �. ' M1. � �.,
�; / ,;
r
; ,. �
Y
_ , .
x � Y s,ry w.; �, � �,,� 6 � ,,� `
U
" ka� �i
u §,.t= '',C „� � :1? �,; !P , / 6�;, '
. :... ..+. , � , � :�.y�'��A ���. . ,a�C�; ,
y �.
1.
. �. 1"n') '�� ' • � �Y �! �:'1F'. ( '� ,�'
� �2
a
� 4 qs �w
� �, .-�,-- k � I t
� � �. =;�''� � �' ,��� „K'r?r�� ,��k.�� � � � �` y� . �;�
: e
V �,�; ..:� �y� �, ,� � ���� � ��". �',' 4
X "r' ` ,1, ,k � n .�,�r.s�s+d,. �J' � ,
I `
W . .. `� ` t 1 s t. � ��:, '1 � �' .�#.5�., .
c � r, ,,. �� �
, �.
c j�r �, ���^ i ,,; � ��&r -*��; � i r,
LL �'`- � .i ,�:�' �'�c ,•��' � �r �'� �
0 � ,'� � �� � � r.� � I '��'=�.L� � ��oi
� `, ���� � � , �*4��'�, ,
� ' M� � "�� � ����'S.w�{, y- q.� �� � w �.�
� 1_.��, . ';!������� i. . �.'S. ��:e�l:l�'d' �Y-_.,�_ � �, �
n� } �,,,�v',`���. �`, ���x������z< \,..
. � _, "`�.� ;� .�
3 e r r',ti .— 1 ��(r? itl: � - ��.
cG'r � �1�T!/ �s,Y ' ��` � l�q.n�,.s, � � M'�iY:� !,�'�'` �.
�� �� �
,
_�':�t�_ �,�; ;s� �'(�� '�" �i� �, � ..�.°� ,a .lz�,...11, r�,l' i.,
� � '�"� -- , _ . ���'� �, � �n)e;�"`,
.x.. -� �; �4���K,;"�� � ,
AERIAL
Owner: Modano Case: FLD2011-08028
Site: 740 Eldorado Ave Property Size: 0.15 acres
PIN: 05-29-15-54666-003-0030 Atlas Page: 249A
+ I 1 .- I�r __
1 .
� � � ��
I 'I.�,/� � lilt '— / � ,' ' , j..
r� � i
� �
1 ti
� / ; .
• .
� �
� i .'e �
. !
.._.._�.. �`i'.�.�.........d —. . y t� e� '.x�
�:. __ 4� Y � '
,. ' 1,`� 4 .... . � �* . � :
'� „& ��� . �'•
:, �A.
�►" �
, III �I .I�i - -.*, �
�
!
�.
. .
.. . ' « � r`y .x�, .. �:;.
� , ,
�. :�: ,.:,. �. ;, ��....� ,
_, � '`s
_ ;� � u� .
�:� _�:�.��„�:� '��`' _�' s � '� ��
View from southeast corner of property looking west. View from northeast corner of property looking west.
�'
. „,
��v� ,� � , � �
r � _
p� �{r~ i� �'� ��= � -�.-_ 4� ,. �i '
� ,1 � . �. � � ,. �II ,
� � � ���� ,�I _
�, ��• � ..� . . a ,�R�. - .-�
„� �,,� „- .,
., �
,
t�; .� �.,�, �,.�,_ � �a� � '�. �.
� Fu €�. �y
� �� � � i ,.`i���
� a.
� -
�;' `� r g.:;, t
c�� �� �j4 1
View from rear(west)property line looking south. View from rear(west)property line looking north.
.II� � `
,,�
, � �
�
� 1
,
,.�- *
, �� � � .
� ..,,.
4 � k .�
� {F
, � ` � 1�__ C � yl . , 4� � � � � �
Z �� w�
—,. ..;
.
.�
t —____.__.____—�__ � �a` ,.
"' t � �i � \� '�ti,;
��� � �� �.
View from front(east)property line looking north. View from rear(west)property line looking east.
740 Eldorado Ave.
FLD2011-08028
�I
�i
� ,
�h�an�ey
C�+�sic�r� P�rtnershi�
r�:hit?ctu�e i �'lanr�j a i-�t=.rir�r�iE�ign
October 14, 2011
To: Mr. Kevin Nurnberger, Planner III
City of Clearwater Planning and Development
100 South Myrtle Avenue
Clearwater, Florida 33756
From:Chancey Design Partnership and Applicant, Michael T. Modano. (Contact: Kalah Woerner,
phone 813-739-6135)
Re: Modano Residence, Case#FLD2011-08028-740 Eldorado Ave.
Dear Mr. Nurnberger,
Listed below are the Owner's and Architect's responses to the Design Review Committee comments,
dated 10/3/2011.
Enqineerinq Review:
1. Comment: Parked Vehicles shall not block the City's sidewalk per City Ordinance Section
30.041(1)(b). Parked Vehicles in the driveway shall not overhang into the City's sidewalk and
righf-or-way. Acknowledge before Community Development Board.
Response: The Owner is aware of this requirement. The 18' distance between the garage door
and the sidewalk edge is adequate to accommodate a car with no overhang at the sidewalk. This
requirement has been added as a general note on the Site Plan A-001.
2. Comment: DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review;additional comments may be
forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application
Response: The Owner and Architect understand that there may be further comments upon
submittal of a Building Permit Application.
Environmental Review:
1. Comment: DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review;additional comments may be
forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application
Tsmpa
1228 East'th A�renu�,Tampa,FL u3fr05
�cl 813 2�18 3258 Fax 813?17 3�i7
S�ea�rove
5365�ast Caur�ty Hi�h�a�ay 34-A,�u tc 168
��.agrove Bea�:h.Fl 3�A53
T�I S�iO 231 20a7 �ax€fi�Q 231 3�53
-�r��srv�.ch�ncEyde�ign.cam
�tA.0 OCJ1785
Response: The Owner and Architect acknowledge that there may be further comments upon
submittal of a Building Permit Application.
Fire Review:
1. Comment: Show Location of the closest fire hydrant, must be within 500 feet of this new
structure. ACKNOWLEDGE PRIOR TO CDB.
Response: A map showing the location of the nearest fire hydrant has been added to the last
page of the application package(8.5 x 11 packet). The closest fire hydrant is approximately 190
feet away at 731 Eldorado Avenue.
Planninq Review:
1. Comment: Sheet A-001 shows that pool pavers will be within side (north) Setback. On same
sheet call out pavers and provide the proposed side yard setback dimension from the property
line to the pavers.
Response: The project team has determined that the pavers do not need to extend into the side
setback as originally shown. This change has been clouded as Revision 1 on the Site Plan A-
001.
2. Comment: Revise request on application form to include a reduction in the side (north)setback
from 5 feet to 3 feet.
Response: The project team has determined that the pavers do not need to extend into the side
setback as originally shown. This change has been clouded as Revision 1 on the Site Plan A-
001.
3. Comment: Pursuant to 3-1908, all utility facilities, including but not limited to gas, water,
wastewater collecfion, electric, telephone, and television cables, except major transmission lines
and transformers, shall be located underground.
Response: This is acknowledged by the project team, and a general note has been added to the
Site Plan, sheet A-001.
4. Comment: The applicant shall submit a Check for$200 for Fire Inspection fee for new residential
development.
Response: A check for$200 will be submitted with the application package.
Stormwater Review:
1. Comment: DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review;additional comments may be
forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application
Response: The Owner and Architect acknowledge that there may be further comments upon
submittal of a Building Permit Application.
Traffic Enqineerinq Review:
1. Comment: DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review,•additional comments may be
forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application
Response: The Owner and Architect acknowledge that there may be further comments upon
submittal of a Building Permit Application.
END OF RESPONSES
'� '�
Planning Department CASE#:
�' � � � � RECEIVED BY(staff initials):
W � �� � _� CI�arvvater,M lor da 33756
DATE RECEIVED:
� . Telephone:727-562-4567
Fax:727-562-4865
1g SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION
1� SUBMIT 14 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION-Plans and
application are required to be collated,stapled,and folded into sets
18l SUBMIT FIRE PRELIMARY SITE PLAN:$200.00
� SUBMIT APPLICATION FEE$ 3OO
�` NOTE:15 TOTAL SETS OF INFORMATION REQUIRED (APPLICATIONS PLUS SITE PLAN SETS)
FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION
Residential Infill Project
(Revised 07/11/2008)
�PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT�
. APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A)
aPPUCaNT NaME: Michael and Amanda Modano
MaiuNC a��RESS: 6424 Mimosa Lane Dallas TX 75230
PHONE NUMBER: 972-974-$$$�j FAX NUMBER:
CELL NUMBER: EMAIL: rpandah�pe(�X aOI.COt1'1
PROPeR�nr owNeR�s�: Michael Thomas Modano
List ALL owners on the deed
aGer,T Nanne: Chancey Design Partnership- Kalah Woerner/Walt Chancey
MAILING ADDRESS: 122$ E'c1St 7tll AV@., Tam a, Forida 33635
PHONE NUMBER: �$'I 3� Z4$- 9ZrJH FAX NUMBER:
CELL NUMBER: EMAIL: I�W08CC1G'CQU Cha11C@)/CIeS19C1.00171
�t, B. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION:(Code Section 4-202.A)
Y`
PROJECT NAME: MOCIaf10 R@SICI211C@ PROJECT VALUATION: $ �j00,��Q
STREETADDRESS 740 Eldorado Avenue
PaRCE�NuMBER�s>: Lot 3 Block 3 Mandala
PARCEL SIZE(acres): O.1 'rJ ACt'eS PARCEL SIZE(square feet): 6600 S.F.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOt 3 BIOCk S MafICIaIa er Plat Book 14 Pa es 32-35 Public Records
of Pinellas Count FL.
PROPOSE�usE�s�: Beach Residence
DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST: 'I Reduction of the front East setback from 25' to 10' to buildin .
Specifically identify the request 2) Reduction of the rear (West) setback from 10' to zero feet (to Coastal
(include number of units or square
footage of non-residential use and all Construction Control Line) for an inground swimming pool and deck at
requested code deviations;e.9. existing grade.
reduction in required number of
parking spaces,specific use,etc.)
C:\Documents and Settings�derek.ferguson\Desktop�planning dept fortns 07081Residentlal Infill Project(FLD)2008 07-11.doc
Page 1 of 8
' �t
DOES THIS APPLICATION INVOLVE THE TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS(TDR),A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED PLANNED UNIT
DEVELOPMENT,OR A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED(CERTIFIED)SITE PLAN? YES_ NO�(if yes,attach a copy of the applicable documents)
C�ROOF OF OWNER$HIP:(Code Section 4-202.A.5)
� SUBMIT A COPY OF THE TITLE INSURANCE POLICY,DEED TO THE PROPERTY OR SIGN AFFIDAVIT ATTESTING OWNERSHIP
(see page 7)
D. WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 3-913.A)
� Qrovide complete responses to the six(6)GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA—Explain how each criteria is achieved,in detail:
1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale,bulk,coverage,density and character of adjacent properties in which
it is located.
The proposed 2900 single family residence will be in pilinas above the Base Flood Elevation
(BFE-13), similar to all new construction along the West side of Eldorado Avenue
2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly
impair the value thereof.
The proposed 2-story residence will be sited comfortably within the setbacks similar to other
adjacent properties.
3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety or persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use.
Th�p�nosPCi r id n P will funrtinn a� a wP k nd and a�onal beach home for the
owners and their family.
4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffc congestion.
Because the existing home is at grade below the B F E qarking is currently relegated to the
street. The proposed project, built on pilings above the B.F.E., will accommodate more
on-site par ing.
5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development.
The proposed project will be wood framed with wood siding, above a block/stucco wall base,
and will make use of exterior materials similar to other residences in the immediate vicinity.
6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects,including visual,acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts,
on adjacent properties.
The proposed proiect will be a well insulated home of solid construction with an energy
efficient footprint.
C:�Documents and SettingsWerek.ferguson\DesMop�planning dept forms 0708�Residential Infill Project(FLD)2006 07-17.doc
Page 2 of 8
' •ti
WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS:(Residential Infill Project Criteria)
��PrOVide complete responses to the seven(7)RESIDENTIAL INFILL PROJECT CRITERIA—Explain how each criteria is achieved,in detaii:
1. The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development is othervvise impractical without deviations from the intensity and
development standards.
If the proposed project adhered to the develo�ment standard setbacks (25' FronU 25' Rear,
5' sides) then it would severely affect the size home that could be developed for this beach
ron prope y.
2. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a residential infill project will not materially reduce the fair market value of abutting
properties.(Include the existing value of the site and the proposed value of the site with the improvements.)
The proposed project is likely to increase the fair market value of surrounding homes with a
well-built, well-designed home that enhances the existing character of the local community.
3. The uses within the residential infill project are othervvise permitted in the City of Clearwater.
The use of the proposed project com�lies with the intent and purpose of the residences
within the 'LMDR' District.
4. The uses or mix of use within the residential infill project are compatible with adjacent land uses.
The proposed project is a two-story single family residence that meets the intent and
purpose of the 'LMDR' District.
5. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a residential infill project will upgrade the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed
for development.
Because the existing home on the �ro e�rty is outdated (codel and non-compliant with
F.E.M.A. guidelines for a V-Zone Residence, the proposed project will upgrade the parcel to
curren s an ar s.
6. The design of the proposed residential infill project creates a form and function that enhances the community character of the immediate vicinity of
the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole.
Becuase the proposed proiect is beinq desiqned by an architect, careful attention to form,
scale, and proportion as well as material selection will enhance the character of the
commun� y.
7. Flexibility in regard to lot width,required setbacks,height and off-street parking are justified by the benefits to community character and the
immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole.
Flexibility with regard to required setbacks�per the variance re�uest, will allow the�ro�osed
project to maintain and uphold the character and fabric of the immediate vicinity.
C:1Documents and SelGngsWerek.ferguson\Desktoplplanning dept fortns 0708�Residentlal Infi�l Project(FLD)2008 07-11.doc
Page 3 of 8
. .� .
E. STORMWATER PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteria
Manual and 4-202.A.21)
❑ A STORMWATER NARRATIVE MUST BE SUBMITTED WITH ALL APPLICATIONS.All appiications that involve addition
or modification bf impervious surface, including buildings, must inciude a stormwater plan that demonstrates compliance with the City of
Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteria manual.A reduction in impervious surface area does not qualify as an exemption to this requirement.
�( If a plan is not required,the narrative shall provide an explanation as to why the site is exempt.
❑ At a minimum,the STORMWATER PLAN shall include the following; Per Matthew Jackson (08-26-2011),
❑ Existing topography extending 50 feet beyond all property lines; a Stormwater Submittal is not
❑ Proposed grading including finished floor elevations of all structures; required at this time.
❑ All adjacent streets and municipal storm systems;
❑ Proposed stormwater detention/retention area including top of bank,toe of slope and outiet control structure;
� A narrative describing the proposed stormwater control plan including ail calculations and data necessary to demonstrate compliance with
the City manual.
❑ Proposed stormwater detentioNretention area including top of bank,toe of slope and outlet control structure;
❑ Signature and seal of Florida Registered Professional Engineer on all pians and calculations.
� COPY OF PERMIT INQUIRY LETTER OR SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT (SWFWMD) PERMIT
SUBMITTAL(SWFWMD approval is required prior to issuance of City Building Permit),if applicable
❑ ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF STORMWATER PLAN REQUIREMENTS(Applicant must initial one of the following):
Stormwater plan as noted above is included
Stormwater plan is not required and explanation narrative is attached. At a minimum, a grading plan and finished floor
}���I„� elevations shall be provided.
t'
CAUTION — IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A STORMWATER PLAN
AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED,APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY
MAY OCCUR.
If you have questions regarding these requirements,contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at(727)562-4750.
F. SUPPLEMENTAL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 4-202.A)
��IGNED AND SEALED SURVEY(including legal description of property)—One original and 14 copies;
�(�I"REE SURVEY (including existing trees on site and within 25'of the adjacent site,by species,size(DBH 4"or greater),and location,
mcluding drip lines and indicating trees to be removed)—please design a�ound the existing trees;
❑ TREE INVENTORY; prepared by a "certified arborist", of all trees 4" DBH or greater, reflecting size, canopy (drip lines) and
condition of such trees;
��OCATION MAP OF THE PROPERTY; Map and Aerial Image
❑ PARKING DEMAND STUDY in conjunction with a request to make deviations to the parking standards (ie. Reduce number of spaces).
Prior to the submittal of this application,the methodology of such stuiiy shall be approved by the Community Development Coordinator and
shall be in accordance with accepted traffic engineering principles. The findings of the study will be used in determining whether or not
deviations to the parking standards are approved;
� GRADING PLAN,as appiicable;
� PRELIMINARY PIAT,as required(Note: Building permits will not be issued until evidence of recording a final plat is provided);
� COPY OF RECORDED PLAT,as applicable;
C:1DOCUments and SettingsWerek.ferguson�Desktoplplanning dept fortns 0708U2esidential Infill Project(RD)2008 07-11.doc
Page 4 of 8
� �1
G. SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL RE�UIREMENTS:(Section 4-202.A)
��"SITE PLAN with the following information(not to exceed 24°x 36"):
�W� Index sheet referencing individual sheets included in package;
1�„y�� North arrow;
i(,,1�� Engineering bar scale(minimum scale one inch equals 50 feet),and date prepared;
1(„(J�� All dimensions;
Footprint and size of all EXISTING buildings and structures;
� Footprint and size of all PROPOSED buildings and structures;
1�3� All required setbacks;
�� All existing and proposed points of access;
�� All required sight triangles;
Identification of environmentally unique areas, such as watercourses, wetlands, tree masses, and specimen trees, including
�� description and location of understory,ground cover vegetation and wildlife habitats,etc;Location of all public and private easements;
� Location of all street rights-of-way within and adjacent to the site;
Location of existing public and private utilities,including fire hydrants,storm and sanitary sewer lines,manholes and lift stations,gas
� and water lines;
� All parking spaces,driveways,loading areas and vehicular use areas;
N/A Depiction by shading or crosshatching of all required parking lot interior landscaped areas;
Location of all solid waste containers,recycling or trash handling areas and outside mechanical equipment and all required screening
N�A {per Section 3-201(D)(i)and Index#701};
N/A Location of all landscape material;
N/A Location of all onsite and offsite storm-water management facilities;
N/A Location of all outdoor lighting fixtures;
�� Location of all existing and proposed sidewalks;and
Floor plan typicals of buildings for all Level One(flexible standard development)and Level Two approvals. A floor plan of each floor is
�,t�� required for any parking garage requiring a Level One(minimum standard and flexible standard)or Level Two approval.
�„_.SITE DATA TABLE for existing,required,and proposed development,in written/tabular form:
N�
EXISTING REQUIRED PROPOSED
�� Land area in square feet and acres; 6600 S.F./0.01515 Acres
t� Number of EXISTING dwelling units; 1-Demo
�� Number of PROPOSED dwelling units; 1
Uulc/ Gross floor area devoted to each use; �"2��� S.F. �"29�0 S.F.
�""_� Parking spaces: total number, presented in tabular form with the
�I,V� number of required spaces; ' 1-I- StC28t 2 Required 2
� Total paved area, inciuding all paved parking spaces &driveways,
e x p r e s s e d i n s q u a r e f e e t&p e r c e n t a g e o f t h e p av ed vehicular area; 'E"210� S.F Concrete ±1060 Perv. Paver
Official records book and page numbers of all existing utility
easement;
�� Building and structure heights; ±22' from grade MSX. 30' at70V2 B.F.
����Impermeable surface ratio(I.S.R.);and �.62 �.65 max. �.rJ�J
Floor area ratio(F.A.R.)for all nonresidential uses. N/A N/A
�� REDUCED COLOR SITE PLAN to scale(8'/:X 11);
�� � FOR DEVELOPMENTS OVER ONE ACRE,provide the following additionai information on site plan:
_ One-foot contours or spot elevations on site;
Offsite elevations if required to evaluate the proposed stormwater management for the parcel;
_ All open space areas;
Location of all earth or water retaining walis and earth berms;
Lot lines and building lines(dimensioned);
Streets and drives(dimensioned);
_ Building and structural setbacks(dimensioned);
Structural overhangs;
C:1Documents and Seffings�derek.fergusonlDesktop�planning dept forms 0708�Residential Infill Project(FLD)2008 07-11.doc
Page 5 of 8
�r
H. LANDSCAPING PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-1102.A)
� �LANDSCAPE PLAN with the following information(not to exceed 24°x 36"):
_ All existing and proposed structures; 7� Per Matthew Jackson (08-26-2011),
_ Names of abutting streets; a Landscape Plan is not required at
_ Drainage and retention areas including swales,side slopes and bottom elevations; this time. Landscape Plans will be
_ Delineation and dimensions of all required perimeter landscape buffers; provided at Permit Review.
Sight visibility triangies;
_ Delineation and dimensions of all parking areas including landscaping islands and curbing;
Existing trees on-site and immediately adjacent to the site,by species,size and locations,including driplines(as indicated on required
_ tree sunrey);
Location, size, and quantities of ali existing and proposed landscape materials, indicated by a key relating to the plant
schedule;
Plant schedule with a key(symbol or label)indicating the size,description,specifications,quantities,and spacing requirements of all
_ existing and proposed landscape materials,inciuding botanical and common names;
Typical planting details for trees, palms, shrubs and ground cover piants including instructions, soii mixes, backfilling, muiching and
_ protective measures,
Interior landscaping areas hatched and/or shaded and labeled and interior landscape coverage, expressing in both square feet and
_ percentage covered; �
_ Conditions of a previous development approval(e.g.conditions imposed by the Community Development Board);
_ Irrigation notes.
� REDUCED COLOR LANDSCAPE PLAN to scale(8'/=X 11);
❑ COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM application, as applicable. Landscape associated with the Comprehensive
Landscape Program shall exceed minimum Code requirements to offset the areas where minimum Code will not be met.
I. BUILDING ELEVATION PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS:(Section 4-202.A.23)
� � BUILDING ELEVATION DRAWINGS—with the following information;
�iW� All sides of all buildings;
1�,t1�� Dimensioned;
1�� Colors(provide one full sized set of colored elevations�reliminary exterior color selections are provided
�� Materials; (selections have not been finalized).
��REDUCED BUILDING ELEVATIONS—same as above to scale on 8'h X 11.
J. SIGNAGE: (Division 19.SIGNS/Section 3-1806)
❑ All EXISTING freestanding and attached signs; Provide photographs and dimensions (area, height, etc.), indicate whether they will be
removed or to remain.
❑ All PROPOSED freestanding and attached signs; Provide details including� location, size, height, colors, materials and drawing;
freestanding signs shall include the street address(numerals)
� Comprehensive Sign Program application,as applicable(separate application and fee required).
� Reduced signage proposal(8'/X 11) (color),if submitting Comprehensive Sign Program application.
���Per Matthew Jackson (08-26-2011), no
Signage Submittal is required at this time.
C:�Documents and SettingsWerek.ferguson�Desktoplplanning dept forms 0708\Residential Infill Projad(FL�)2008 07-11.doc
Page 6 of 8
K. TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY: (Section 4-202.A.13 and 4-801.C)
� Include if required by the Traffic Operations Manager or his/her designee or if the proposed development:
■ Will degrade the acceptable level of service for any roadway as adopted in the Comprehensive Plan.
■ Will generate 100 or more new vehicle directional trips per hour and/or 1000 or more new vehicle trips per day.
■ Will affect a nearby roadway segment and/or intersection with five(5)reportable accidents within the prior twelve(12)month period or
that is on the City's annual list of most hazardous intersections.
Trip generation shall be based on the most recent edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineer's(ITE)Trip General Manual.
The Tra�c Impact Study must be prepared in accordance with a �Scoping Meeting" held with the Traffic Operations Manager and the
Planning DepartmenYs Development Review Manager or their designee(727-562-4750)
Refer to Section 4-801 C of the Community Development Code for exceptions to this requirement.
� Acknowledgement of traffic impact study requirements(Applicant must initiai one of the following):
Traffc Impact Study is included.The study must include a summary table of pre-and post-development levels of senrice for all
roadway legs and each turning movement at all intersections identified in the Scoping Meeting.
�� Traffic Impact Study is not required.
CAUTION — IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REt�UIREMENT FOR A TRAFFIC
IMPACT STUDY AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED
AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR.
If you have questions regarding these requirements,contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at(727)562-
4750.
L. FIRE FLOW CALCULATIONS/WATER STUDY:
Provide Fire Flow Calculations.Water Study by a FIRE PROTECTION ENGINEER to assure an adequate water supply is available and to determine if
any upgrades are required by the developer due to the impact of this project. The water suppiy must be abie to support the needs of any required fire
sprinkler,standpipe and/or fire pump. If a fire pump is required the water supply must be able to supply 150°/a of its rated capacity. Compliance with
the 2004 Florida Fire Prevention Code to inciude NFPA 13,MFPA 14,NFPA 20,NFPA 291,and MFPA 1142(Annex H)is required.
� Acknowledgement of fire flow calculations/water study requirements(Applicant must initial one of the following):
Fire Flow Calculations/Water Study is included.
-�� Fire Fiow CalculationslWater Study is not required.
CAUTION — IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A FIRE FLOW
CALCULATIONS/WATER STUDY AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE
RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR.
If you have questions regarding these requirements,contact the City Fire Prevention Department at(727)562-4334.
M. SIGNATURE:
i,the undersigned,acknowledge that ail representations made STATE OF FLORIDA,COUNTY OF PHdEtt�s ��II h�l�'D✓�i�l
in this application are true and accurate to the best of my Swo to and subscribed before me this 3t� day of `�
knowiedge and authorize City representatives to visit and ,A.D.20 l l to me and/or by
photograph the property described in this application. O N ,who is�,ersonally known has
produced
as identific n.
�esJC�.���(� /
Signature of property owner or representative Notary p li . �(,• ZD��- .
My commission expires:
,,�"•�= DESIREE A PERQ
:•: rg MY CAMMISSION#EE 017715
C:1Documents and SettingsWerek.ferguson�Desktoplplanning dept forms 07081Residentlal Infill Project(R �,y ��RES:Auglist 16,2014
Page 7 of 8 .�Af,�:�•' '�0�ed Thru Notary PubC�c Undervrtiters
N. AFFIDAVIT TO AUTHORIZE AGENT:
1. Provide names M atl property owners on deed—PRIN7 full names:
Michaet Thomas Modano
2. That(I am/we are)the ovmer(s)and record Uile holder(s)o{the fotlowing described property(address or general location):
_74D Eldorado Avenue., Cleannrater Beach�.FL __ �_..___� ____ __
3, l'hat this properly consUtules Ihe properiy fnr which a request tor a:(describe request) .
_ Level i Flexible Development for Front and Rear Setback requirements; ______ .._..__
_Level II Flexibie Development for Accessory Structure{Pooi} setback. _ _ _____
4. That the u�dersigned(has/have)appoiMed and(does/do)appoini_ � ,
__Kalah Woerner/ Walt Chan� of Cf�a�cey Design Partnership o�Tampa Floricia. .
as(h(sltheir)agenl(s)to execute any peQtlons or other documents necessary t6 aifect such petition:
5. That this affidavit has been executed to induce the City of Clearwater,Florida to consider and act on ihe above described praperly;
6. Thal site visits to lhe property are necessary by City represenlafives in order to process this applicalion and the owner authorizes City
represeniatives to vistt and photograph lhe propeRy described in this appfieation;
7. That( , e dersign ori ,he by certify ihat lhe loregoing is true and correct
._-- — - rap Uvner `--•-----------•- —•--•--------Property Owner —._..----•--�----
------------•—Proper[y Owner --•_ --._____ •--�------ —;-Property Owner� •_. --
' STATE OF FLORIDA,
COUNTYOF-P}PFE�9 -�-���Ih�aor'oUS�'1
B fore me the undersigned,an offioer duly commissioned by ihe laws oi Ihe State oi Florida,ort tE�is _.._-3�� ,____ day of
_ ..�� , ��� � personally appeared _�(�2C�_�Ol�avl.�_. , who having been first duly swom
Deposes and says that he/she fully undersiands the contents of Ute affidavit that he/sh igned.
, ' ' / �� .
Notary Pu Signature
Notary SeaUSlamp My Comm�ssion Expire : �. 201
—._ ..�+---- '--k-._�_. --
' ",,,�",•,,, DESIREE A PERQ
��'� MY COMMISSION Y EE 017715
�, 'ti�a D(PIRES:August 16,2014
iq,P f�:4d'� Bonded Ttw Nat�y Pubiic Und�twriters
>
a �
�u � . ,.. ,�. <�> n
� v •-• .
�
�
� �
� `d
�' .: ti t �.aa s �v�`Yr t.+� Y'����L[ " 1,� Fx *� ��` ..�t,a t€�`a ,,.�
y1� �'au'..��'�dJ'xa�r���t�i,�� � �`f t���a•yy � r �
5' `T .� '
k
t
h M�"�g;a� t �y,�,w�,4•�`�"�i ,�•�$'y�+ s � ����7�', -.�.i� 6�i k t # �y.:
�� "���i � � �s�t A�.N,� e .y �^'/KuaW3. .
£�°� +.��*;�r$ �:��+,..��1 t�.. �r�.£'f�,�,,�,j�,�` a .�'� t ���< ^r- '� f..j
,� k xr '��, }'R d� �' X.� u ��� 7�.h.:� �
� � �, 7� . C ,,,�.,r.�'�a„*�sT sj,? b �,� ���'�4p�t1G ,, 4 5" �� *�.�.L?Zl
@; m a� fP .7+.�x.. ..�µ h"•. �.N�N'� M�
.
��� ;. ..,, •
@ � uWMrprM �� Y � �.
R ��'.
e A�'�� O "'�`�-�r���—�� �{`' ,s �:;� q�,��`�,�.� �s � i f�� 3
57���� *4 ��A �4�. . .
,.� �'ka F i*6�' �icF � ^. S�
Ji�?g" j li"'.,�_;. !'41 °R':'=aa $ , k p�uuAv�"�
� � � s
, A W
s+ � .ev.o�w �, � ri s� ,t � � ,.: 3{
.+vqP.wod �"p� . ... x;
r .,� ' � xy, �S.�r��� �'��! �dwd+`�t` �'�s�"m7u���' r? }' :�. i , ....a.,.em:U. .�� .
� � �
},,. �, ' * ,�`�� ��,+.L� y ��, lMrnJ
� ''�"�.�:: � 'F3`�r�.,,`.�- �3 `��Z"�"`.�` �` k x n'k {,+t �. 3 4 � �' � �� �„�
�:�� . �S �,.;c 5� �r���.� ',�.,+a' ��:P�
� Bry�� ' "+ �`�� �'� r��.�� �y�i��,s�. @ v.� #�'!.a .�v�� j t;
,..i ;. ,�"',.x��I�� ��-,� g ,�r�., � ��
.
r�-�5� �" -'� .,`,�+''�a'�p�i�� ���F��� � �
..,�*. '�,3s r�' :.'+` ayE�i n
�A�`�y,tr,�� "-n
��$,M::f ' '.�,i
M
3«lt.. �lR"F�U X�� -�`t
.C` �. & zkS �.M� +
L Yc�
p � \� "�` :'�K Y � J�^' T R `^+'?
< t .4 �R a I �� F a�.�' Y Ar l� b�,�t
� t � G
� �t�� ��' � � , f"� � � �'�.^ � ' w�L,�.�9�i `'`�z K6 �a .
��� i t �} . Y. {� �y�� ir S
" �.+ f.�` IYtiyNry �,:, .:'i s;.
k>?� �., � r '{
st'i� � � ��.¢. ,�.�r ; i '.� ���
��w( S �?��� .����..r �- Y .s H�;� � ¢f• � :'���+.��,�i
:
"E 4.. t}�
Y!� ir.`� ��c�t a .�� ,�.'s. # 1� ;$�L
�'�"'"'� ��,' � � � '����z.�.
Y���
�, .
; �� * �`
A'.��, �k ��.� � ���,��. s�'�
k � '�'�.t�. '��''r;
^. i1�""�:�",��tr µ*`:,. x� ��'ki,:,�'� t �'
.' .. tW.,�i'*a 4�.�' � =..��
��'p�M°'"A "� . �,:�„��^ t�� C-,�i-. -.
:� • x� c�
7 . �5;� '�' � °��i
h � �x q+W�M � � �� ��,� .
+�4 t�, . ,�am .:{. �-.�
x �
� ����,��-�. -�""+�"� �� ''
5 . a 1t5 x J `i��u 41�1'��.,�,—..� � ti�..
� ��"� � ����ex� �4�� ��A � ��� .
���'..� 14 {.w��."�+i7 t�M1ta,F `.�.. �.
h .+�' 'x�a . .�A+�b�'-'a
� - - -���,.�- �,. �
� .- • -- : . .
,. .
, � .�����111����-�__, ,
�� �� '
-, ,_ �� ,_,�-� .�
�� r-� � �� =�!1=nl :• �� lir ' �ii =►.�
, � ` : � !,1� II�
_
�':�� '���.�'����'-��1:'�: : I■ :�I:��-
_ , , .� .
�: ��i�����
— _` - �
.�'-._,,.,;: ,.,, , .,,.,,., ,.,,., ,..,,.,, �
...._
� � � � � �'���� ���
�
_ ■■ ■■ : � ■■ ; ■■ ;
I_I� I���I ���� : _- I��' :
�= I�I I� : =�� I�' ?
I �I- - _ _� —
, ���: � uiim����� .
�Illlllll�llli '
�' I_ �.��-- i�,s^
�,.
�
�o �� � �`"v_
( I - �--- - - -I' _ ��: �
�� '
- ' , . ,.. ..
_ -:
'I
' '' i1 I - -
I1 ' ■ ■ 1� � ` �i ,. , ,, , ,
O ' '
�
�����Illllilllllllll I �� Illlllllli��������• ---
� ���s�e��e��e��e�
le��e � � �le��llll�lllll�
�
�`---- �� �� --- ������ -- ��II�IY I ---��i
I�I�I I lil■�,,I■�_
- __ ■, �� � ,
� .,. .
,,� ,
;I==C==C=CC==C==C=iC==GiiOi=G=iQ==Ci=C=CC==C==C==Q;� , ' . ,
'�_���_:__ — - s==��,�s:.- ����
= I_ .�1 �� I--= I �1_=i
. �� � �1�'�1� i ���
- �,' �s�
,
� � _ : II 'll =��,��i�=� _�� _� ���
__ _ �� _ - ���
-
: �� � :
- _I I_ I■ _f
.
�.
.
.
,. .. .
. - - �m�
_ �' -
= =_ IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII � = 11111111111111111111111111111111111111111 =`__.
II1--I III I . _ ���_ I— . .
• � �� ■— --'- �_ . _ � _—��-- .»
� � ��l�f� I � I�wwuwwnwwuw�i���
: ����_.—t�=: �;- ,"; : : . .
" �� � ��������������������������������������������������� I�;I� .
; — ..,
,,,� ., ,.-
:: �: ���� - ��������� ��������������������������������������������������� :;-►� :: , . .
- _ �� i � �miiiiiuiiiiiuiiiiiiiniumiuuiiiimiimutt�ll
, o . . .
� :
„ � �
.. � .
%\••�� '�
,%�IIII���II���_� �� jll
�¢,��,\I I�
�
`'�1—=�-=�1 11:�-\`� ��IIi�il � "��°I' -
— ��; 'I (:�
•=__— •'—, I■I'�� ■I .
_�� ��� .
I —
� --- •
� � :=,:a... ..__ _����� � . . .
— -
. -��.=�.=�.-�:;.;.,�-.�..._ �
.
_ � . . ,
� — �.
_
—_
_ _
}� �_ ��� ......... �.
,,.,,..,., .
_ ..,..,,.,. .
�_ _ _.�_�,_��_
� . .,.,,.,,.,,.,,.,,.,,.,,.,,.,,.,,.,,.,,.,,.,,.,...._ i,�
_,, :„,_,_o� �o`��i��
___ _:. __
- I:I'' I:'��I=1��� �I----; ;--
_ __o� �o _ �
_ _ I
;. �;;i!� �- ... _ - ���ii� �i��� � .
_ ii�� _ _,�I� _ __ ,,�
,.
—
,
__— �
,
. ' _ -— _, — —i� .. , .
�:��i ��� �, ,�
.. � ���I�I�lil - -, �� - ��, , .
����������� � � -._ � �_ . _�: ��. . . �,
o .. . .
::!!�III IIIII��'��I�,
___ ________
����.�....,, � �
.........,_.�,�����l������� . �
==oii��-_ — — _'�������
'�'-i'—=I'�_— — °��I:,�:�� i�l:� :I�':',�----��
-- _I'I'll'I'll= �_
_ �.,...■�,� �, �i 111 I .. .
: �i;i3��=I,'��'I_��I�'������IM�����������������I� ����
..--� — — — — — ;'— -- ;: ����
_ . — _
�-� , � , oolllomlloollloo` ►ooj oo�� ►o�Ioo,Iool�o� � � iP� ���
�=�lill°Ir- - -- _ _ _ _ =__
_ — _ '@ ���
�_'� �I -11��t(t�t� �t�t� �������1 - ��� _��
_��_�� - _
.• .; _ „� _ . . ._
._. � -_ — — �' - - _ .— -I�I�I��, =1 �.
� ,,,.,��I��i'i��lf�ll�! �J I�II— — -,�
: � ._, •�
_ _ . . . . � . .1
_ ��
I�I I�_ - � �5:'.
-- ° �s= 1
U�I���_ = . . ��_ • . ,
_ _ _ �
740 Eldorado Ave, Clearwater Beach,FL 33767 to 731 Eldorado Ave, Clearwater Beach, ... Page 1 of 2
� � — Directions to 731 Eldorado Ave,Clearwater
���,����� Beach, FL 33767
�- 187 ft
i Save trees.Go green! -'
'oa�m�Qad cor�gie Maps on your
ipd�ane at goagle.tamlymm
� � ��F �
, ; �r j
�
, i }
r
� (
4. � ; � ,:
� � t h� t k.
k�' ' �,�t j�t� .
} ��� �S t
� � � t £
� }
{ '
t > � ?�° �
: � t ',
� � r � �
. . � i X Y�t� . ..
,�i., � it
� � � � 40 Eldorado Ave �;_. � � �
�y ;� ����,
� ' ;,�;�
4 ��k
� ; t
�
�� ; � j'
� � Nearest fi�re � `
, # n
; } hy�rant �approx.
��0 feet a�vayj '
; `# ,
�`
. . . ��.�k � . . . . . .. �
� � . � �I .��i `-�.�
. . .. � t, . . . . . .j�t
� . . � �_._ .. .. . _.. . , ; ,,
`` �CiGi'3Q � ", � � ,:. � _
� ���� E €� ' ;
. z�� � �
��° ,� ti , ; �a f � ����.� 1 :".
d =
� . � , �= s
� � � ��' �'�� `��� �� ����020]�Go'ogle�Map`data02011 Googie=
http://maps.google.com/maps?saddr=740+E1dorado+Ave,+Clearwater+Beach,+FL+3376... 10/12/2011