The URL can be used to link to this page

FLD2011-09029; 507 CEDAR ST; CLAYTON RESIDENCE - Continued from November 15, 2011 � ,A � 507 CEDAR ST Date Received: 9/1/2011 11 :50:29 AM Clayton Residence ZONING DISTRICT: Commercial LAND USE: Commercial General ATLAS PAGE: 268B PLANNER OF RECORD: PLANNER: Robert Tefft, Development Review Manager CDB Meeting Date: December 20, 2011 Case Number: FLD2011-09029 Agenda Item: D. 2. Owner/Applicant: Robert F. Clayton Agent Jay F. Myers Address: 507 Cedar Street CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT GENERAL INFORMATION: REQUEST: Flexible Development application to permit a single-family detached dwelling within the Commercial (C) District with a lot size of 3,500 square feet, a lot width of 50 feet, a front (north) setback of 15 feet, a rear (south) setback of six feet, side (east and west) setbacks of six feet, a height of 13 feet, and two off-street parking spaces as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project as per Community Development Code Section 2-704.C. ZONING DISTRICT: Commercial (C) District FUTURE LAND USE PLAN CATEGORY: Commercial General (CG) PROPERTY USE: Current: Vacant Proposed: Detached Dwelling EXISTING North: Commercial (C) District SURROUNDING Vacant ZONING AND USES: South: Commercial (C)District Attachecl Dwellings East: Commercial (C)District Attachecl Dwellings West: Commercial (C) District Retail Sales cznd Service (Vacant) UPDATE: This case was continued at the November 15, 2011, Community Development Board (CDB) meeting to this meeting as a result of a 3-2 vote by the Board to deny the application (four votes are required to approve or deny an application). During the discussions regarding this application there was a question as to the zoning history of the property. Based upon the zoning atlas's that are presently available, as of November 5, 1987, the property was zoned Multiple Family Residential 8 (RM8). At some point between that date and November 18, 1993, the property was rezoned to Infill Commercial (CI). Upon the adoption of the Community Development Code (CDC) on January 21, 1999 (which became effective March 8, 1999), the property was rezoned to Commercial (C) District, which is the current zoning designation of the Community Development Board—November 15,2011 FLD20ll-09029—Page 1 property. It can also be confirmed that the subject property was purchased by Mr. Clayton on January 12, 1999. ANALYSIS: Site Location and Existing Conditions: The 0.08 acre property is located on the south side of Cedar Street, approximately 125 feet east of North Fort Harrison Avenue. While the property previously consisted of a single-family detached dwelling, the structure was demolished in 1996 and has been a vacant parcel ever sense. The surrounding area is predominantly residential in nature with a mixture of attached and detached dwellings; however there are also commercially developed properties to the west along N. Fort Harrison Avenue. Development Proposal: The proposal is to permit the construction of a detached dwelling in the Commercial (C) District. The proposed 1,475 square foot, single-story dwelling would have a front setback of 15 feet as well as side and rear setbacks of six feet. The dwelling would also consist of an attached one-car garage with adequate space in the driveway to park an additional vehicle. Pursuant to Article 2, Division 7, Community Development Code (CDC), detached dwellings are not a permitted use within the Commercial (C) District. However, Section 2-704.C., CDC, does allow for uses that are otherwise permissible by the underlying future land use plan category to be applied for through the submittal of an application for a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project. The development proposal's compliance with the applicable development standards of the CDC is discussed below. Density: Pursuant to the Countywide Plan Rules and Section 2-701.1, CDC, the maximum allowable density in the Commercial General (CG) future land use plan category is 24 dwelling units per acre. The proposed single-family detached dwelling will result in a density of 12.5 dwelling units per acre, which is consistent with the above. Impervious Surface Ratio (ISR): Pursuant to the Countywide Plan Rules and Section 2-701.1, CDC, the maximum allowable ISR in the CG future land use plan category is 0.9. The overall proposed ISR is 0.51, which is consistent with the above. Minimum Lot Area and Width: Pursuant to CDC Table 2-704, there is no minimum required lot area or lot width for a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project. However, for a point of comparison, the minimum lot area and lot width requirements for detached dwellings in the various residential zoning districts are as follows: Minimum Lot Area Minimum Lot Width Zonin District Standard Flexible to Stanrlard Flezible to LDR 20,000 square feet 10,000 square feet ]00 feet 50 feet LMDR 5,000 square feet 3,000 square feet 50 feet 25 feet MDR 5,000 square feet 3,000 square feet 50 feet 30 feet MHDR I5,000 square feet 5,000 square feet I50 fcet 50 feet HDR 15,000 s uare feet 5,000 s uare feeT 150 feet 50 feet Community Development Board—November 15, 20ll FLD2011-09029—Page 2 The subject property has a width of 50 feet and an area of approximately 3,500 square feet (0.08 acres) both of which are well within what would be the allowable range for lot area and width of detached dwellings in residential districts. Minimum Setbacks: Pursuant to Table 2-704, CDC, there are no minimum setback requirements for a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Proj ect. However, for a point of comparison, the minimum setback requirements for detached dwellings in the various residential zoning districts are as follows: Minimum Front Setback Minimum Side Setback Minimum Rear Setback Zonin District Standard Flexible to Standard Flexible to Standard F[exible to LDR 25 feet 25 feet 15 feet 5 feet 25 feet 5 feet LMDR 25 feet 15 feet 5 feet 2 feet 10 feet 5 feet MDR 25 feet 25 feet 5 feet 0 feet 5 feet 5 feet MHDR 25 feet 25 feet 10 feet 5 feet 15 feet 5 feet HDR 25 feet 25 feet 10 feet 5 feet 15 feet 5 feet The subject property has a front setback of 15 feet and side and rear setbacks of six feet. While the proposed side and rear setbacks are well within the allowable range for detached dwellings in residential districts, the proposed front setback would only be allowable in one of the five residential districts. However, it is noted that the 15-foot setback would be consistent with the typical allowable setbacks for development in the C District. Maximum Buildin� Hei�ht: Pursuant to Table 2-704, there is no maximum allowable building hPi�ht fnr a �'r,rr,pr?hPnsive Tn_fi_ll Reclevel�nment Proiect. However, for a point of comparison, the maximum building height allowed as a minimum standard for detached dwellings in the various residential zoning districts is 30 feet. In the C District, the typical maximum building 1leight allowed as a minimum standard is 25 feet regardless of use. The proposed building height is 13 feet, which is well below any of the above maximums. Minimum Off-Street Parkin�: Pursuant to CDC Table 2-704, the minimum required parking for a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project is determined by the Community Development Coordinator based on the specific use and/or ITE Manual standards. The off-street parking requirement for detached dwellings in the various residential zoning districts is two spaces per dwelling unit. The development proposal would comply with these requirements as it includes a one-car garage with adequate room for an additional space in the driveway. Solid Waste: Solid waste will be handled by black barrel containers stored in the attached garage. Com�rehensive Infill Redevelopment Project Criteria: Pursuant to Section 2-704, CDC, the uses allowed within the C District are subject to the standards and criteria set forth in this Section. As the proposed use of the subject property (detached dwelling) is not specifically authorized in the C District, the proposal has been made using the Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project application, and is subject to those criteria in Section 2-704.C., CDC, as follows: Community Development Board—November 15, 2011 FLD2011-09029—Page 3 1. The development or redevelopment is otherwise impractical without deviations from the use and/or development standnrcls set forth in this zoning district. Regardless of the use being proposed, any development of the subject property would require deviation from the development standards established for the C District. Given the relatively small size of the property, it would be impossible to develop as any use without some amount of flexibility being given to lot size, lot width, setbacks, height and off-street parking. If the proposal was for a commercial-type use, then the flexibility being requested would most likely be even more substantial than is being requested for the detached dwelling— assuming that it would even be possible to develop the property with a commercial-type use. 2. The development or redevelopment will be consistent with the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plc�n, as well as with the general purpose, intent ancl basic planning objectives of this Code, and with the intent and purpose of this zoning district. This criterion requires consistency with three distinctly different areas of concern, and each bears need for its own response. Consistency with the Comprehensive Plan: There are several goals, objectives and/or policies of the Comprehensive Plan that the development proposal would be consistent with, and for the most part the applicant has done a fine job in identifying these. In addition to those noted by the applicant, Policy A.2.2.3 states that "commercial land uses shall be located at the intersection of arterial or collector streets and should be sited in such a way as to minimize the intrusion of off-site impacts into residential neighborhoods. New plats and site plans shall discourage the creation of "strip commercial" zones by insuring that adequate lot depths are maintained and by zoning for commercial development at major intersections". As previously noted, the subject property is relatively small, and the property would not appear to be able to meet the standard established in Policy A.2.2.3 as it lacks the depth (and width) necessary to accommodate commercial development. Further, it is not located at an intersection; let alone the intersection of arterial and collector streets. Based upon this information, it would appear that development of the subject property as anything other than a residential use would be contrary to the Comprehensive Plan. However, before arriving at such a conclusion there are two policies that should be taken into consideration: Policy A.6.2.2 and Policy A.6.2.3. Policy A.6.2.2 encourages land use conversions on economically underutilized parcels and corridors to promote redevelopment activities in these areas, while Policy A.6.2.3 states that redevelopment activities should be targeted in areas where land assembly opportunities exist. The neighborhood originally developed with attached and detached dwellings, and several years ago the neighborhood was rezoned as Commercial (C) District with the hope of revitalizing the area by providing for increased development potential; however this change has yet to occur. The original attached and detached dwellings are now interspersed among numerous vacant lots (such as the subject property) and are representative of an area that is economically underutilized and underdeveloped, or as the applicant puts it, an area that "without a doubt is stagnated." Community Development Board—November 15, 2011 FLD2011-09029—Page 4 The dwellings that remain in the area are constructed for the most part on substandard lots that could only be redeveloped with flexibility from development standards, and would be much better served being combined with other adj acent parcels to form property that conforms to the established lot size and width standards for the district. These newer and larger parcels could then be developed in a manner that is consistent with the district standards. In fact, there are already properties within this very block that have been assembled together far the purpose of future commercial development with the owner intent upon acquiring additional properties in the future. The purpose of Comprehensive Plan Policies A.6.2.2 and A.6.2.3 is to provide the direction necessary to bring about the change that has been envisioned for neighborhoods and properties such as this one. Based upon these policies the approval of a new single-family detached dwelling on the subject property that is contrary in its use to the zoning designation of the property, and would only serve to perpetuate the ongoing economic underutilization and underdevelopment of the neighborhood, and would become an impediment to land assembly opportunities cannot be supported and the application should be denied. Consistency with the General Purpose of the CDC: As was noted previously, there are properties within the subject block that have been assembled for the purpose of future commercial development, and the owner of these properties is intent upon acquiring additional land to be a part of this development. Among these pieces of land is the parcel immediately to the south of the subject property. The approval of a residential use on the subject property would have a distinct and negative impact upon the redevelopment potential of this adjacent property that would not be present should the subject property redevelop in-line with adopted C District development standards. Specifically, Section 3-1202.D.1., CllC, requires where non-residential deveiopment is proposed adjacent to other non-residential development that a five-foot wide landscape buffer be provided with one tree every 35 feet (on center) and a continuous shrubs (hedge) for 100% of the length of this buffer. However, this same Section requires where non- residential development is proposed adjacent to a detached dwelling that this perimeter landscape buffer have a width of twelve feet and that the shrubs (hedge) attain a height of six feet within three years of planting. Non-Residential Adjacent to Non-Residential Non-Residential Adjacent to Detached Dwelling 5-foot wide landscape buffer 12-foot wide landscape buffer One tree/35 feet One tree/35 feet 100%shrubs 100%shrubs(height of 6 feet within 3 years) What this means is that the approval of a detached dwelling on the subject property would constitute an impediment to the redevelopment of the surrounding properties, and not just the property to the south either. What this means is further expense in developing these adjacent properties, and additional hurdles that a prospective owner/developer would need to overcome in order to obtain fair and equitable value far their property. Community Development Board—November 15, 2011 FLD2011-09029—Page 5 Section 1-103, CDC, sets forth the general purposes of the Code. Among those stated are the following purposes that would be violated should the proposed application be approved: Section 1-103.B.2. Ensuring that development and redevelopment will not have a negative impact on the value of surrounding properties and wherever practicable promoting development and redevelopment which will enhance the value of surrounding properties. Section 1-103.E.3. Protect and conserve the value of land throughout the city and the value of buildings and improvements upon the land, and minimize the conflicts among the uses of land and buildings. Consistency with the Intent and Purpose of the Commercial (C) District: The intent and purpose of the C District is to provide the citizens of the City of Clearwater with convenient access to goods and services throughout the city without adversely impacting the integrity of residential neighborhoods, diminishing the scenic quality of the city or negatively impacting the safe and efficient movement of people and things within the City of Clearwater. The development of the subject property with a single-family detached dwelling would fail to meet the aforementioned intent and purpose of the district as it will not provide the surrounding neighborhood with access to good and services. Failing this, the application cannot be supported and should be denied. 3. The development or redevelopment will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of surrounding properties. As discussed previously, the subject property has a zoning designation of C; the purpose of which is far the property (most likely in conjunction with other surrounding property) to be developed with the purpose of providing access to goods and services to the citizens of the City. This would be what is envisioned as being "normal and orderly development." As the development proposal would not accomplish this and instead develop the property as a detached dwelling, it cannot be found to comply with this criterion as it would perpetuate the neighborhood as existing in a manner that is contrary to the established vision. 4. Adjoining properties will not sz ffer substantial detriment ccs c� result of the proposed clevelopment. As discussed previously, if the subject property is developed as a detached dwelling the perimeter landscape buffer required to be provide on the adjacent properties increases substantially. This would result in an impediment to the redevelopment of these surrounding properties manifested in greater development expenditures and additional hurdles that a prospective owner/developer would need to overcome in order to obtain fair and equitable value far their property. Community Development Board—November 15, 2011 FLD2011-09029—Page 6 ____ _ S. The proposecl use shall otherwise be permitted by the underlying future land use category, be compatible with adjc�cent land uses, will not substantially alter the essential use characteristics of the neighborhood; and shall clemonstrate compliance with one or more of the following objectives: a. The proposed use is permitted in this zoning district as a minimum standard, flexible stanclard or flexible development use; b. The proposecl use would be a significant economic contributor to the City's economic base by diversifying the local economy or by creating jobs,- c. The development proposal accommoclates the expansion or redevelopment of c�n existing economic contributor; d. The proposed use provides for the provision of affordable housing; e. The proposed use provides for development or redevelopment in an area that is characterizecl by other similar development and where a Icznd use plan amendment c�nd rezoning would result in a spot lancl use or zoning designation; or f. The proposed use provides for the development of a new and/or preservation of a working waterfront use. The underlying future land use plan designation for the subject property is General Commercial (GC), which pursuant to the Countywide Plan Rules, includes residential uses as being appropriate and consistent with the category. As noted previously, the surrounding area includes a mix of attached and detached dwellings, so the proposal will be compatible with adjacent land uses and will not alter the characteristics of the neighborhood. Further, the proposal is consistent with objective "e", above, for those same reasons having just been noted. 6. Flexibility with regczrd to use, lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street pczrking are justified based on demonstrated compliance with czll of theJollowing design oti�ectives: a. The proposed development will not impede the normal and orderly development ancl improveanent of the surrouncling properties for uses permitted in this zoning district; b. The proposed development complies with applicable design guidelines �cdoptecl by the City; c. The design, scale and intensity of the proposed development supports the established or emerging character of czn czrea; d. In order to form n cohesive, visually interesting ancl attractive appearance, the proposed development incorporates a substantial number of the following design elements: ❑ Changes in horizontal builcling planes; ❑ Use of architectural details such as columns, cornices, stringcourses, pilasters, porticos, balconies, railings, awnings, etc.; ❑ Variety in materials, colors ancl textures; ❑ Distinctive fenestrntion patterns; ❑ Building step backs; ancl o Distinctive roofs forms. e. The proposed development provides for appropriate buffers, enhanced landscape clesign and appropriate distances between buildings. Cornmimity Development Board—November 15, 20ll FLD201 1-09029—Page 7 It is noted that in order for a positive finding to be made with regard to this criterion, compliance must be demonstrated with all of the noted design objectives. While there appears to be compliance with regard to objectives "b", "c", "d" and "e", the development proposal cannot achieve compliance with objective "a" as the proposal would not develop the property with the purpose of providing access to goods and services to the citizens of the City of Clearwater, which is what is envisioned as being "normal and orderly development" for properties with a zoning designation of C. As this objective has not been achieved, the criterion has not been met. COMPLIANCE WITH STANDARDS AND CRITERIA: The following table depicts the consistency of the development proposal with the standards and criteria as per Sections 2-701.1 and 2-704, CDC: Standard Proposed Consistent lnconsistent Density 24 du/ac 12.5 du/ac X I.S.R. 0.9 0.51 X Minimum Lot Area N/A 3,500 square feet(0.08 acres) X Minimum Lot Width N/A 50 feet X Maximum Height N/A 13 feet X Minimum Setbacks Front: N/A North: IS feet(to buiiding) X Side: N/A East: 6 feet(to building) X West: G feet(to building) X Rear: N/A South: 6 feet(to building) X Minimum Determined by the Community 2 parking spaces X Off-Street Parking Development Coordinator based on the specific use and/or ITE Manual standards(2 parking spaces) Community Development Board—November 15, 20ll FLD2011-09029—Page 8 COMPLIANCE WITH FLEXIBILITY CRITERIA: The following table depicts the consistency of the development proposal with the Flexibility criteria as per Section 2-704.C., CDC, (Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project): Consistent Inconsistent L The development or redevelopment is otherwise impractical without deviations from X the use and/or development standards set forth in this zoning district. 2. The development or redevelopment will be consistent with the goals and policies of X the Comprehensive Plan, as well as with the general purpose, intent and basic planning objectives of this Code, and with the intent and purpose of this zoning district. 3. The development or redevelopment will not impede the normal and orderly X development and improvement of surrounding properties. 4. Adjoining properties will not suffer substantial detriment as a result of the proposed X development. 5. The proposed use shall otherwise be permitted by the underlying future land use X category, be compatible with adjacent land uses, will not substantially alter the essential use characteristics of the neighborhood; and shall demonstrate compliance with one or more of the following objectives: a. The proposed use is permitted in this zoning district as a minimum standard, flexible standard or flexible development use; b. The proposed use would be a significant economic contributor to the City's economic base by diversifying the local economy or by creating jobs; c. The development proposal accommodates the expansion or redevelopment of an existing economic contributor; d. The proposed use provides for the provision of affordable housing; e. The proposed use provides for development or redevelopment in an area that is characterized by other similar development and where a land use plan amendment and rezoning would result in a spot land use or zoning designation;or f. The proposed use provides for the development of a new and/or preservation of a working waterfront use. 6. Flexibility with regard to use, lot width, required setbacks, height and oft-street X parking are justified based on demonstrated compliance with all of the following design objectives: a. The proposed development will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of the surrounding properties for uses permitted in this zoning district; b. The proposed development complies with applicable design guidelines adopted by the City; c. The design, scale and intensity of the proposed development supports the esYablished or emerging character of an area; d. In order to form a cohesive, visually interesting and attractive appearance, the proposed development incorporates a substantial number of the following design elements: ❑ Changes in horizontal building planes; ❑ Use of architectural details such as columns,cornices,stringcourses,pilasters, porticos,balconies,railings,awnings,etc.; ❑ Variety in materials,colors and textures; ❑ Distinctive fenestration patterns; ❑ Building step backs;and ❑ Distinctive roofs forms. e. The proposed development provides for appropriate buffers, enhanced landscape design and appropriate distances between buildings. Community Development Board—November 15,2011 FLD2011-09029—Page 9 COMPLIANCE WITH GENERAL STANDARDS FOR LEVEL TWO APPROVALS: The following table depicts the consistency of the development proposal with the General Standards for Level Two Approvals as per Section 3-914.A., CDC: Consistent Inconsistent l. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, X coverage,density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage development and use of 7� adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons X residing or working in the neighborhood. 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. X 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the X immediate vicinity. 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including X visual,acoustic and olfactor and hours of o eration im acts on ad acent ro erties. SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION: The Development Review Committee (DRC) reviewed the application and supporting materials at its meeting of October 5, 2011, and deemed the development proposal to be legally sufficient to move forward to the Community Development Board (CDB), based upon the following: Findin�s of Fact. The Planning and Development Department, having reviewed all evidence submitted by the applicant and requirements of the Community Development Code, finds that there is substantial competent evidence to support the following findings of fact: l. That the 0.08-acre (3,500 square foot) subject property is located on the south side of Cedar �treet, approximateiy i25 ieei easi oi ivorin rori riarrisun tivel�ue; 2. That the subject property is located within the Commercial (C) District and the Commercial General (CG) Future Land Use Plan category; 3. That the subject property is currently vacant; 4. That the subject property has a width of 50 feet as measured at the front (north) property line; S. That the development proposal requests the approval of a use (detached dwelling) that is not specifically authorized by the Community Development Code for the C District; 6. That the development proposal includes a front setback of 15 feet as well as side and rear setbacks of six feet; 7. That the development proposal includes a building height of 13 feet, and the provisions of two off-street parking spaces; 8. That Comprehensive Plan Policy A.6.2.2 encourages land use conversions on economically underutilized parcels and corridors to promote redevelopment activities in these areas; and Comprehensive Plan Policy A.6.2.3 states that redevelopment activities should be targeted in areas where land assembly opportunities exist; 9. That the intent and purpose of the C District is to provide the citizens of the City of Clearwater with convenient access to goods and services throughout the city; and 10. That there are no outstanding code enforcement issues associated with the subject propei-ty. Community Development Board—November 15,2011 FLD2011-09029—Page 10 Conclusions of Law. The Planning and Development Department, having made the above findings of fact, reaches the following conclusions of law: l. That the development proposal is consistent with the Standards as per Tables 2-701.1. and 2- 704, CDC; 2. That the development proposal is consistent with the Flexibility criteria set forth in Sections 2-704.C.1 and 5, CDC; 3. That the development proposal is not consistent with the Flexibility criteria set forth in Sections 2-704.C.2, 3, 4 and 6, CDC; 4. That the development proposal is consistent with the General Standards for Level Two Approvals as per Sections 3-914.A.1, 3, 4, 5 and 6, CDC; and 5. That the development proposal is not consistent with the General Standards for Level Two Approvals as per Section 3-914.A.2, CDC. Based upon the above, the Planning and Development Department recommends DENIAL of the Flexible Development application to permit a single-family detached dwelling within the Commercial (C) District with a lot size of 3,500 square feet, a lot width of 50 feet, a front (north) setback of 15 feet, a rear (south) setback of six feet, side (east and west) setbacks of six feet, a height of 13 feet, and two off-street parking spaces as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project as per Community Development Code Section 2-704.C. �— �� , �'!i , Prepared by Planning and Development Department Staff: — Robert G. Tefft, Development Review Manager ATTACHMENTS:Location Map;Aerial Map;Zoning Map;Existing Surrounding Uses Map;and Photographs of Site and Vicinity Comrriunity Development Board—November 15, 2011 FLD2011-09029—Page 11 Robert G.Tefft 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater,FL 33756 (727)562-4539 robert.tefft(a�mvclearwater.com PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE ■ Development Review Manager City of Clearwater, Clearwater, Florida August 2008 to Present Direct Development Review activities for the City. Supervise professional planners, land resource specialists and administrative staf£ Conduct performance reviews. Serve as staff to the Community Development Board. ■ Planner III City of Clearwater, Clearwater, Florida June 2005 to August 2008 Duties include performing the technical review and preparation of staff reports for various land development applications, the organization of data and its display in order to track information and provide status reports, and making presentations to various City Boards and Committees. ■ Planner II - City of Clearwater, Clearwater, Florida May 2005 to June 2005 Duties include performing the technical review and preparation of staff reports for various land development applications, the organization of data and its display in order to track information and provide status reports. ■ Senior Planner City of Delray Beach, Delray Beach, Florida October 2003 to May 2005 Performed technical review of and prepared staff reports for land development applications such as, DUL IlUI 11ID11CC1 LU: S1lC PldI15� GVI1111L1VI1Q1 USGS� fC`LUI11I1�, 1dIlC1 USC dII1CI1C1II1CIll5� dIl(1 LCXI 'dII1CI1ClII1CIILS. Organized data and its display in order to track information and provide status reports. Make presentations to various City Boards. ■ Planner City of Delray Beach, Delray Beach, Florida March 2001 to October 2003 Performed technical review of and prepared staff reports for land development applications such as, but not limited to: site plans, conditional use and text amendments. Organization of data and its display in arder to track information and provide status reports. Provided in-depth training to the Assistant Planner position with respect to essential job functions and continuous guidance. ■ Assistant Planner City of Delray Beach, Delray Beach, Florida October 1999 to March 2001 Performed technical review of and prepared staff reports for site plan development applications. Performed reviews of building permit applications. Provided information on land use applications, ordinances, land development regulations, codes, and related planning programs/services to other professionals and the public. EDUCATION Bachelor of Arts, Geography(Urban Studies), University of South Florida, Tampa,Florida � rv� PaIARSHALl. d W GRANI � y (7 F. /.. GJ (y --� Q� C1� � �"" � Z �� CARLTpN � '� L1 , _ O � ��MAN �� w� �'�L� � 7ANGE � � � EN G MAN � Si � '�- 9'O W�L� �� O pAL.M � LA SALLE � _ �I.U�F sr � PROJECT Q PALM s- � � SITE } � a�pRi NG � � � Z w� Z ,v C�DAR g� M� � � 14fET70 � �fr /( � �� L �/ ' hbe.RGO �! � � � +v�cEto�sont sT � � � rnc�o�saa sr V � ❑ 0 �� s�nn�uo�� a � �� 4 ELDRIDGE ST U v�i�LJ� � MO � � Maple MAPLE � � C� W LEE St � � Q ¢ PLAZA Sf ¢ GE�2 GdA � � HART ST �� JONES � s� � ST �ocar►oN Owner: Robert F. Clayton Case: FLD201 1-09029 Site: 507 Cedar Street Property Size: 0.08 acres PIN: 09-29-15-60102-003-0100 Atlas Page: 268B »pp 1f05 �� °o � � � � f017 ��02� � � � i � � I � i " v �016� � �015 �� 1f07 � � � a f076� � 9�p� � z z �012��(/ ��3 i � »00 � 10>? � i , /� 1013 / � o / f07� fp / L D Q ,o„ �° �,00� /� � �o„ � ,o,o� � o � �� I � a >0,�,� . ! , ',��9 /,�50 /N �'' V >oos >oos �� I � l � �ooe/ � � � y --� °j � `ti �� f007 �004 Q � � 100q�� l>007 � � � �040 � 2 � � ,00s � �ooz � � �ooz � Q ��o � / � � � � � , '� / / � °' � ,- � Q � � � e � W ° � Q ° e o00 �Q � � � � �O � � Q �o � � � �o�o � aoo � � j � � � % � / IJ► i � U'� CEDAR ST � m�b � I � �� ,n � 9f3 h 9lp� � �9>5 � � u�� °v �� '$ �� r°o� � �� Z / ` r 9>1 � i i 909 9fj � �� 8 � 908 � 909 !909 / � 906 � l l �� 908 � � I I 906 / � 907 / g07 / / 912! � 906 / � � I � �o� 1 sos� � � - sa4 � ; � 904 gp5 ,l_-____----' �� BOS / , � 905 904/ � �4 j 903 ; V i 902 �/ i9p03 / 90 % 902 / 90f / � �� o ^ ^ / ' � o �v v �0 900� � � � � I u4 �i 900 00 � pv o � � � � / V ? C V / ( � `O I tp � 'p � ,, I m � V � I �II 8f0 i 813� v °� °' Bf�/ / �i �i �°n �i �i ° I � �^°o v I v m Ic� �' � h o � � � � SOB � 808/ 809 � 808 � 817 ` ° o 0 /ao� sos eo� � / � ai� , m N�CHOLSON ST � g06 9 i 806 % gpg —_.___,� ((� M �n a � 804 �� 804� � � � 804� (� � I �� 4 � 2 805 � 807 � � � � � 804 8ps i / � � i / MV � , g03 gO / 803 � 802/ 805 � 802 � .. v / 8021�1 / p� 80, � 80 � � % % L11� R � oN Q � soo'' o ! 8p� °v°v v° °v h b° � v° v� 801°o o Qo o � o � �°o a v'� o o r� �o 'o p� io c � � i. o o� � �� SEMINOLE ST ZONING Owner: Robert F. Clayton Case: FLD201 1-09029 Site: 507 Cedar Street Property Size: 0.08 acres PIN: 09-29-15-60102-003-0100 Atlas Page: 268B - — L _ 00 1f05 a �a � �o 0 a � z — � 33 �y 1102 ��3 �' �o 101735 — � _ 3 � � 20 � 1 � 36 1100 1107 22 Z4 26 �26 �� / y 2 � , O y 7��6 7�7J� ��s �5 2 � ��Q� ' o e �.:/ t3 14 40 2 2 A ,—o,—,� ,0,3 — r � 2> >,00 � ,0,3 'S �6 �o,? ? Q ,z ,a 6 � a$ �o 39 Q �-1 �� 010 — — — — i v �o» „ 16 R °� �L� a � �o� E� �o�o �� , O 3 2 `V � — — � ° — — � " `' �o�o � B �oos 24 ,° �oos�ET CH D�oos oso � 1 �o ,� s o �, - - - - - - r z `� `y 1007 9 18 1pp 23 30 ��4 ' 35 42 6 1040 2 4 1 HED — E — — _ _ s is �pp2 2z s� f0o foof � as — _ DET� CH O fp — � 4 o � �o,� � °vzo �000 � 2, � ��W LLIN S ss $aa m �o�o �, 00 � ,� as ��z ,<ro, � CEDAR ST ,� � �o 0 0 o p ,� y ,�l 9f3 O�Z s o 0 0 60 � ^ � � �o � sf 2 '`° tom m � �T IL ALES sos SCHOOL L�it�{/ICES y0e O 9 O + 908 - - e�A�N� 908 � 909 Z 9 _ 909 2 906 ai,oi � _ $IIB l/'1� l{.� � 9073 907 912 so> > � z sos ZQ ACANT �� E� -0�T CFI�D 904 ' — h 905 1-� 905 a S � Q 904 905 SC��L g� O 4 s ' DU� I os � v .. h „ �,W 902 903 (VA�Af�� O1 90? �� _ � n I �1 I� � 40 �°v'S � / �v°v9� _ �� 9� so m � � sm 60 � 4 � I 2 �' � � NICHOLSON ST � � 5� 6 I � �9 Z � $��r° °v � °v*°a o � o o v I 10 h h $ h h �D „ m l� gl $ ol � l \ y,\� ' �N bos � 10 �j (� � O h r. r. � r. � 08 811 / � 808 808 81j� nms � � V / � '� � p 807 ,�l 81 � m � � 8ps �$� �ry�2 806 2 9 0 0 3 8 D 4 � � _ � — a o � i°. M °L--��' � ? 805 3 2 8 "° Q� 807 �e � V 60 02^�^ 8'os� � 4 � �a S O Q 14 �s � I �i '�� ep3 g � 5 �8p 803 a 7 �n p (�� 05 2 � 802 m 1 � � Z�p 8 �0� _ _�_� = O — _ 15 16 17 19 _�� sg 80 , � �pp � I �s o 8p1� v� a, v $ 5 y 9�ri � � 8� m 5 m m�,'J sm 4p g � � � � � o �` � ,o '° SEMINOLE ST A R s EXISTING CONDITIONS Owner: Robert F. Clayton Case: FLD2011-09029 Site: 507 Cedar Street Property Size: 0.08 acres PIN: 09-29-15-60102-003-0100 Atlas Page: 268B , .�,. _ � �� p��• � � •J r • �� _ v � � �� . -� R U , ' # r Z / � �� ` 1� '� � � l ,t i, M1�;� . R� �/ .� } , ,}`' y s � �� U J��I. \v 3. �, � ` � „ 'J ' " '� � ��;'�� f �Y�� !�� " � � ' � I—, �' ' r j, J � .� �� ;�- � ,�r ,�' �� ' �= r . , -� �.' �' ( 1r �. �' �.r � � �� :, J r • ' � � ,(�' >-� �`; s �r y �.. �,. � _ �,� ;r ;,, �. fi � . � '� � ` �.. . _. s �:,�' �. �'y'� GL'"� f � 7 ; . y f ,�q� +S � .. �j �� a� r�, � ,' � � � � 1 ' r ..+� � '�r,�',� � „w - �.° It'(l�d.l..��!� '= i� A �� f., � �� i r � �{. .�.` �� ' I � �' � + � �i/ .. .� - - �,..y� � :�,► 'C�4' . . ..� �+. _ ., �� '� t ,�,;� �L , `,I\� ` ;,.� `� ',., . � __.� �� :,� ��) � � `` J.: � . `, K 1 � �`� �� a �. +�'� " ' { .J��ll' _'" • �'. � � ,, � � k' r.,, :� . i . r � _� � t � E � � f � � ..• .� i� 1 �r ` �I� ..ii K �I v � � r ��, t ' f _ .* � + ' ..�• J - � �� ; �.- ,,. �_ SCIt'i(!�'��LL�1 r` . �. .+�. . AERIAL Owner: Robert F. Clayton Case: FLD201 1-09029 Site: 507 Cedar Street Property Size: 0.08 acres PIN: 09-29-15-60102-003-0100 Atlas Page: 268B � ,, , � �-}� ,,��.� �,. �� h� �� !�. ' .� ,� . r a aa � �� •r�� ; /� � � �� :. � '_- - ". ! . . �r � ,� i� - �� . .r � �, r '1yi '. h . .y�� .i�c � .� s a#� :S�E �" v"Sl�. ' I �� ' .;�' e�*'.:t �`�'T`:� �.'t>. � , , '�� :S�n; _..F'� . , . �,K ..- r �' _ �a p .. , � � ,,,�4,.:s ,� �c; �� '��II � � ,-_...� � � � �' � t.f� �' �� ,... �� `� ��.�.�� ,��.� �` ��.�s.�'r. _'��Ss �:..� ..x. ...m a�s�,.�.�, . , �"'e . ... . Looking south from Cedar Street at subject property Looking south from Cedar Street at adjacent property to the west � �A � �p� �� ,��r�= �T �pe � �� ' 1� 4 s �� ? r `I t �; I 4,� �� t� i i t � i ( 1 �— �z , _ ._ . �_e�. _ _ , .�`: � � � �;- ... . - � __ v _. � _ , . . .a,�M � .,.,�.4,,., �,��:.. il .. Looking southeast from Cedar Street at adjacent Looking east along Cedar Street property to the east � � �� ,� ,��3.�� ':, •� � '�,� 'ti`� ,*�,, � �� h d, 4� �� r' � �,� , ` 4 ` �, �. . �� ! F � f� ,•� 2i 1 '�. ��i"�� 9 �":� ,,4 '4 ; �':�" '� �• , 1��'�s_ +��;4 d1�,� � ti ��, .. � E.�. .{ ii K�".i• �u �1.. �� =t` �,t ,� � �,�'� �� r f, T • `t � ' � � #� �,�i. � �..� r��, �i�l * `� _�,. 1 � � �,�.ta.�� y�� I I�I�� . � �.� . �� "*�. -� . 1! ^ R•�! �' � � �T,'�' ��,� �,�� _ �-� . �� - � �� _ . �� ,, . � � � ,� ,t_ # � w _�.�: � . Looking north from Cedar Street at vacant property Looking northeast from Cedar Street at vacant . across from the subject property property and nearby residential property 507 Cedar Street FLD2011-09029 To Whom It May Concern I have been inforxned of the proposed residential structure at 507 Cedar St., Clearwater, FL adjacent to my property, and I have no objection. Signed: L7,1�- Date: L/ I �/�� Ed Chesney owner of parcel 09/29/15/60102/003/0090 906 N. Garden Ave. Clearwater, FL 33755 / " - �/�CC��'` t�°'t�"�t Pa�t,� �l°`�S - �a� � � ��t�tr�,t. -�'F€:F�`✓Ei �{ .A �.�i;{ r.� d��;E�=�,�Fr�sE��; ``Tp �r ti:LEF,p�,yr/�7Ef< November 4, 2011 Community Development Board I am in receipt of the Notice of Community Development Board Public Hearings to be held on November 15, 2011, Case No. FLD2011-09029 -507 Cedar St. I had previously signed a letter of No Objection to the development of the property located at 507 Cedar Street. At that time the full details of the project were not provided. I see from the notice a rear and side setback of 6 feet is proposed. My property abuts this property to the south and I am concerned and surprised at how close to the property line this house would ultimately sit. I had not realized how small the proposed lot is or how big the house would be. At this time I would like to retract my No Objection status. While I will not outright oppose my neighbor's project, I will remain neutral and concerned. The ultimate decision will be up to the CDB. My concern is what impacts (if any) a newly granted residential use could have on me, being so close to any commercial re-development on my property. Sincerely, � G%(�-- Ed Chesney i. ' Pianning Deparbnent CASE#: .' C earwater 100 South Myrtle Avenue RECEIVED BY(staff initials): Clearwater,Florida 33756 DATE RECEIVED: Telephone:T27-562-4567 Fax:727-562-4865 O SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION ❑ SUBMIT 14 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION-Pians and appiication are required to be collated,stapled,and foided into sets ❑ SUBMIT FIRE PRELIMARY SITE PLAN:5200.00 ❑ SUBMIT APPLICATION FEE$ * NOTE:15 TOTAL SETS OF INFORMATION REQUIRED (APPLICATtONS PLUS SITE PLAN SETS) FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project (Revised 07/11/2008) �PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT� A. APPLICANT,PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION:(Code Section 4202.A) APPLICANT NAME: �pb�}.. � � MAILING ADDRESS: ?� � C7�� FL ?�q0 PHONE NUMBER: '7?� • $12 '77? � FAX NUMBER: , '7 CELLNUMBER s�y�,�� ay �� EMAIL: t+�'G� �� PROPER7YOWNER(S�: �abe.r�- F. C-Ic�� OVL� List AlL owners on the deed AGENT NAME: � � MAILING ADDRESS: � G 'l� PHONE NUMBER: 127. 15 c�fJ. .'�� FAX NUMBER: '7Z,� • C��j • 7�3 8 CELL NUMBER: '�2'� • �� .C�j�3 2,. EMAIL: � � , � ,�� B. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION:(Code Section 4-202.A) PROJECT NAME: [��}v y� �.a� L1�K�,,e�_ _ PROJECT VALUATION: $ 2.Cj�{jl 1 Z.S "' STREET ADDRESS 50-� C,�� PARCEL NUMBER(S): .. � - D • C7 O PARCEL SIZE(acres): � D��e � PARCEL SIZE{square feetj: ?� LEGAL DESCRIPTION: �, � � � � '� �� , ( � PROPOSED USE(S): DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST: � �D;- GL �d e��C�.� C�. � Specifically identiy the request ��, .� e S` (include number of units or square . footage of non-residential use and ail �,�u�T�� O v1n�N►t�f c�G�� (�LCvLt�.� . _ _____ requested code deviations;e.g. —S reduction in required number of _ _ _ ______._ parking spaces,specific use,etc.) C:1Documents and Settingslderek.fergusonlDesktoplplanning dept forms 0708\Comprehensive Infill Project(FLD)2008 07-11.doc Page 1 of 8 DOES THIS APPLICATION INVOLVE THE TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS (TDR), A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED PLANNED UNI DEVELOPMENT,OR A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED(CERTIFIEO)SITE PLAIY? YES_ NO,�[ (if yes,attach a copy of the applicable documents) r� C. PROOF OF OWNERSHIP: (Code Section 4-202.A.5) � SUBMIT A COPY OF THE TITLE INSURANCE POLICY, DEED TO THE PROPERTY OR SiGN AFFIDAVIT ATTESTING OWNERSHIP (see page 7j D. WRiTTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 3-913.A) O Provide complete responses to the six(6)GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERlA-Explain J�w each criteria is achieved,in detail: 1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale,buik,coverage,densiry and charader of adjacent properties in which R is located. �c.� �}�r�.c,.ln.e�1. __—__ - --— — — - 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. � f"'�'��..+1a.` 3. The proposed development wili not adversely aifect the heafth or safety of persons residing or working in the neighbofiood of the proposed use. �`J' e� ��a.��t�e.d 4. The proposed development is designed to minlmize traffic congestion. JtC. ��C.L►�� _ 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. �C-t tt�r�-t�G�lP � --—- 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse eifects,including visual,acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts,on adjacent properties. � �"C��G.� _ C:1Documents and Settingslderek.ferguson�Desktoplpla�ning dept forms 07081Comprehensive Infiil Project(FLD)2008 07-11.doc Page 2 of 8 WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Comprehensive Infiil Redevefopment Project C�iteria) ❑ Provide complete responses to the six(6)COMPREHENSIVE INFILL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT CRITERIA-Explain j�w each criteria is achieved,in detail: 1. The development or redevelopment is otherwise impracticaf without deviations from the use and/or developmeM standards set forth in this zoning district. Stc f�C'�I�GC.�/l.Q.� 2. The development or redevelopment will be consistent with the goals and policies of the Compr�ehensive Plan, as well as with the general purpose,intent and basic planning objectives of this Code,and with the intent and purpose of this zoning distrid .�e,t. /s�4-�rt.t.ld�..d 3. The development or redevelopment wili not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of surrounding properties. ��i►� �t�+tCwt.�A.�� - - — - 4. Adjoining properties wiil not sufEer substantial detriment as a resutt of the proposed development. :Jec �kk�►.c i�.e_(�, 5. The proposed use shall othervvise be pertnitted by the underlying future land use category, be compatible with adjacent land uses, wili not ' substantialy aRer the essential use characteristics of the neighborhood; and shail demonstrate compliance with one or more of the following objectives: a. The proposed use is permitted in this zoning district as a minimum standard,flexible standard or flexible development use; b. The proposed use would be a signficant economic contributor to the City's economic base by diversifying the local economy or by creating jobs; c. The development proposal accommodates ihe expansion or►edevelopment of an existing economic contributor, d. The proposed use provides for the provision of affordabie housing; e. The proposed use provides fo�development or redevelopment in an area that is characterized by other similar development and where a land use plan amendment and rezoning would result in a spot land use or zoning designation;or f. The proposed use provides for the developmeM of a new and/or preservation of a working waterfront use. � A��.�. 6. Flexibility with regard to use,lot width,required setbacks,height and off-street parking are justified based on demonstrated compliance with all of the follawing design objectives: a. The proposed development will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of the surrounding properties for uses permitted in this zoning disMct; b. The proposed development complies with appliqble design guidelines adopted by the City; c. The design,scale and intensity of the proposed development supports the established or emerging character of an area; d. In order to form a cohesive,visually interesting and attrac�ive appearanoe,the proposad development incorporates a substantial number of the following design elements: O Changes in horizontal building planes; D Use of architectural detaits such as columns,comioes,stringcours,ess,pilasters,port�os,balconies,railings,av+mings,etc.; ❑ Variety in materia�,colors and textures; ❑ Distinctive fenestration patterns; ❑ Building stepbadcs;and O Distinctive roofs forms. e. The proposed development provides for appropriate buffe�s,enhanced landscape design and appropriate distances beiween buildings. 5ee. Akkr,.,c..�� ._ __ �. C:1Documents and Settingslderek.ferguson�ktoplplanning dept forms 0708\Comprehensive Infill Project(FLD)2008 07-11.doc Page 3 of 8 E. STORMWATER PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (City of Ciearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteria Manual and 4-202.A.21) ❑ A STORMWATER NARRATIVE MUST BE SUBMI7TED WITH ALL APPLICATIONS.All appiications that involve addition or modification of impervious surface, including buildings, must indude a stormwater plan that demonstrates compliance with the Cily of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteria manual.A reduction in impervlous surface area does not qualify as an exemption to this requirement. ❑ If a plan is not required,the narrative shall provide an explanation as to why the site is exempt. O At a minimum,the STORMWATER PLAN shall inGude the foltowing; ❑ Existing topography extending 50 feet beyond all property lines; ❑ Proposed grading including finished floor elevations of all structures; ❑ All adjacent streets and municipal storm systems; ❑ Proposed stortnwater detentioNretention area including top of bank,tce of slope and ouUet control structure; ❑ A naRative describing the proposed stortnwater control plan includ'mg aii calculations and data necessary to demonstrate compliance with the City manual. ❑ Proposed stortnwater detentioNretention area including top of bank,tce of slope and outlet control structure; ❑ Signature and seai of Ftorida Registered Professional Engineer on all plans and cak7uulatio�s. ❑ COPY OF PERMIT INQUIRY LE'iTER OR SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT (SWFWMD) PERMIT SUBMITTAL(SWFWMD approval is required prior to issuance of City Building Permit),if appiicable � ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF STORMWATER PLAN REQUIREMENTS(ApplicaM must initial one of the folbwing): Stormwater pian as noted above is inGuded _� Stormwater plan is not required and explanation naRative is attached. At a minimum, a grading plan and finished floor elevations shali be prov�ed. CAUTION — IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A STORMWATER PLAN AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED,APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements,contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at(727)562-4750. F. SUPPLEMENTAL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS:(Code Section 4 202.Aj l� SIGNED AND SEALED SURVEY(induding legal description of property)—One original and 14 copies; �` TREE SURVEY (induding existing trees on site and within 25' of the adjacent site, by species, s¢e(DBH 4°or greater), and location, including drip lines and indicating trees to be removed)—p/ease design around the existing b�ees; � TREE INVEN70RY; prepared by a"cert�ed arborisY', of all tress 4'DBH or greater, refleding size, canopy(drip lines)and condition of such trees; f� LOCATION MAP OF THE PROPERTY; O PARKING DEMAND STUDY in conjunction with a request to make deviations to the parking standards(ie. Reduce number of spaces). Prior to the submittal of this application,the methodology of such study shall be approved by the Community Development Coordinator and �'Ac shall be in axordance with acoepted traffic engineering principtes. The findings of the study will be used in determ(ning whether or not deviations to the parking standards are approved; 6� GRADING PIAN,as applicable; ❑ PRELIMINARY PLAT,as required(Note: Building permits will not be issued urrtil evidence of recording a frnal plat is provided); ❑ COPY OF RECOROED PLAT,as applicable; C:1Documents and Settingslderek.fergusonlDesktoplplanning dept forms 0708\Comprehensive Infill Project(FLD)2008 07-11.doc Page 4 of 8 G. SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS:(Section 4-202.A) 6� SITE PLAN with the following information(not to exceed 24"x 36'�: �/ Index sheet referencing i�dividual sheets inGuded in padcage; � North arrow; ,/ Engineerirtg bar scale(minimum scale one inch equals 50 feet),and date prepared; �/ All dimensions; � (A Footprint and size of all EXISTiNG buildings and structures; ��Footprint and size of ali PROPOSED buildings and structures; �� Ali required setbacks; �/All existing and proposed points of access; f All required sight tria�gles; Identfication of environmentally unique areas, such as watercourses, wetiands, tree masses, and specimen trees, induding IJ��r description and location of understory,ground cover vegetation and wildlife habitats,etc;Location of all public and private easements; �,C Location of all street rights-of-way within and adjacent to the site; � Location of existing public and private utilities,inciuding fire hydrants,storm and sanitary sewer lines,manholes and lift stations,gas and water lines; � All parking spaces,driveways,loading areas and vehicular use areas; � Depiction by shading or crosshatching of all required parking lot Interior landscaped areas; � Location of all solid waste containers,recycling or trash handling areas and outside mechanicai equipment and all required screening _ {per Section 3-201(D}(i)and index#701}; .L Location of aB landscape material; .� Location of all onsite and offsite storm water management facilities; �1 l► Location of all outdoor lighting fixtures; '�4- � Location of ail existing and proposed sidewalks;and � Floor plan typicals of buiidings for all Level Two approvals. A floor plan of each floor is required for any paricing garage requiring a _ Level Two approval. � SITE DATA TABLE for existing,required,and proposed development,in written/tabular form: EXISTING REQUIRED PROPOSED ,/ Land area in square feet and acxes; 3�'l�(� s,�.�{, �.O$G�trCS fJ fjp.wt,,�. �/ Number of EXISTING dweiling units; � N Q �/ Number of PROPOSED dwelling units; �__ �j ' ,4 _ � � Gross floor area devoted to each use; � ��_�J __�_� Parking spaces: total number, presented in tabular form with the � number of required spaoes; (� 2-- Z Total paved area, inc{uding all paved parking spaces 8 driveways, �Zvj ,/ expressed in square feet&percentage of the paved vehicular area; (' !J�_____ 1�7Z5�� -- Official records book and page numbers of all existing utility ✓ easement; N�/� N�Lt N�� Building and strudure heights; Q N�A 1 Z'tO��abOVtO� � Impermeable surface ratio(I.S.R.);and � 1�/A, �j� �'jo _�Ftoor area ratio(F.A.R.)for all nonresidential uses. nj�/4. J,(/4- N�Ja— (� REDUCED COLOR SITE PLAN to scale(8%:X 11); ❑ FOR DEVELOPMENTS OVER ONE ACRE,provide the following additional information on site plan: ��i� One-foot contours or spot elevations on site; I ll�.G)_ Offsite elevations if required to evaluate the proposed stoRnwater management for the parcel; Ali open space areas; Location of all earth or water retaining walls and earth berms; Lot lines and building lines(dimensioned); Streets and drives(dimensioned); Building and structural setbacks(dimensioned); Structural overhangs; C:�Documents and Settingsklerek.fergusonlDesktop�pianning dept forms 0708\Comprehensive Infill Project(FLD)2008 07-11.doc Page 5 of 8 H. LANDSCAPING PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 41102.A) L�; LAIVpSCAPE PLAN with the following information(not to exceed 24°x 36°): yAll existing and proposed structures; � , Names of abutting streets; � Drainage and retention areas including swales,side siopes and bottom elevations; " � Delineation and dimensions of all required perimeter landscape buffers; , �/ Sight visibility triangles; �/ Defineation and dimensions of all parking areas including landscaping islands and curbing; f Existing trees on-site and immediately adjacent to the site,by speaes,size and locations,inGuding driplines(as indicated on required _ tree survey); Location, size, and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, indicated by a key relating to the plant � schedule; J Plant schedule with a key(symbol or label)indicating the size,description,spec�cations,quantities,and spacing requirements of all _ existing and proposed landscape materials,including botanical and common names; fTypical planting details for trees, palms, shrubs and ground cover plants including instructions,soil mixes, backfilling, mulching and protective measures; Interior landscaping areas hatched and/or shaded and labeled and interior landscape coverage, expressing in both square feet and � percentage covered; ��Cond'Rions of a previous development approval(e.g.conditions imposed by the Communiry Development Board); • � Irrigation notes. $� REDUCED COLOR LANDSCAPE PLAN to scale(8'/X 11); ❑�1�kCOMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM application, as applicable. Landscape associated with the Comprehensive Landscape Program shall exceed minimum Code requirements to offset the areas where minimum Code will not be met. I. BUILDING ELEVATION PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4202.A.23) � BUILDING ELEVATION DRAWINGS—with the following information: ,`� All sides of all buildings � Dimensioned � Colors(provide one full sized set of colored elevations) � Materials '� REDUCED BUILDING ELEVATIONS—same as above to scale on 8'/:X 11 J. SIGNAGE: (Division 19.SIGNS/Section 3-1806) ❑��All EXISTING freestanding and attached signs; Provide photographs and dimensions (area, height, etc.), indicate whether they will be removed or to remain. ❑p�,Ali PROPOSED fneestanding and attached signs; Provide details inGuding location, size, height, colors, materials and drawing; freestanding signs shall include the street address(numerals) ❑�1A►Comprehensive Sign Program application,as applicable(separate application and fee required). ❑N'RReduced signage proposal(8'/:X 11) (cobr),if submitting Comprehensive Sign Program application. C:1Documents and Settingslderek.ferguson�Desktoplplanning dept forms 0708\Comprehensive Inflll Project(FLD)2008 07-11.doc Page 6 of 8 K. TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY:(Section 4202.A.13 and 4-801.C) ❑ include if required by the Traffic Operations Manager or hisTher designee or if the proposed development: �' ■ Will degrade the acceptable level of service for any roadway as adopted in the Comprehensive Plan. • Will generate 100 or more new vehicle directionai trips per hour and/or 1000 or more new vehide trips per day. ■ Will affect a nearby roadway segment and/or iMersection with frve(5)reportable acxidents within the prior twelve(12)month period or that is on the City's annual iist of most hazardous intersections. Trip generation shail be based on the most recerrt edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineer's pTE)Trip General Manual. The Traffic Impact Study must be prepared in accordanoe with a "Scoping Meeting" held with the Traffic Operations Manager and the Pianning OepaRmenYs Development Review Manager or their designee(727-562-4750} Refer to Section 4-801 C of the Community Development Code for exceptions to this requirement. � Adcnowledgement of traffic anpad study requiremerrts(Applicant must initial one of the folbwing): Traffic Impact Study is included.The study must inciude a summary table of pre-and post-development levels of service for all roadway legs a�d each tuming movement at all intersections identified in the Scoping Meeting. _�_ Traffic Impad Study is not required. CAUTION - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUiREMENT FOR A TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMI'iTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements,contact the City Pubiic Works Administration Engineering DepaRment at(727)562- 4750. L. FIRE FLOW CALCULATIONS/WATER STUDY: Provide Fire Flow Calculations.Water Study by a FIRE PROTECTION ENGINEER to assure an adequate water supply is available and to detertnine iF any upgrades are required by the developer due to the impact of this project. The water suppty must be abie to support the needs of any required fire sprinkler,standpipe and/or fire pump. If a fire pump is required the water supply must be able to supply 150°�,of its rated capacity. Compliance with the 2004 Florida Fire Prevention Code to inGude NFPA 13,MFPA 14,NFPA 20,NFPA 291,and MFPA 1142(Mnex H)is required. � Adcnowledgement of fire flow calculations/water study requirements(Appticant must initial one of the following): Fire Flow Calculations/Water Study is included. � Fire Flow Calculations/Water Study is not required. � CAUTION - IF APPLICATtON REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A FIRE FLOW CALCULATIONS/ WATER STUDY AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMIITED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. � If you have questions regarcling these requirements,contact the City Fire Prevention Department at(727)562-4334. M. SIGNATURE: I,the undersigned,adcnowledge that all representations made STATE OF FLORIDA,COUNTY OF PIN��LJ�S in this application are true and accurate to the best of my S m to a d subscribed before me this '�`� day of kn ge and autho' City representatives to visit and _��r ,A.D.20�to me andlor by • phot raph the prope described in ' - F ,who is personaly known has `""' AARON D. RYAN p � Y�'b� :,.o. =,�� ",- MY COMMISSION#OD 9683S2 tfication. :;;��a.= EXPIRES:February 21,2014 �°`'�� onal Notary :K public, Signature of roperty owner or pre My commission expi . C:1Documents and Settingsklerek.fergusoMDesktop�planning dept forms 0708\Comprehensive Infill Project(FLD)2008 07-11.doc Page 7 of 8 N. AFFIDAVIT TO AUTHORIZE AGENT: 1. Provide names of all property owners on deed-PRINT full names: �obcr-�- �F Gl�.�a-o.2.�----- _ ______ _____ ___ ___ _ _ _. 2. That(I am/we are)the owner(s)and record titie holder(s)of the following described property(address or general location): 5�� _Ge._dc�..r__�-�-_r__�.e,-l-�_ .G1e c�r-i..�o.kc.�-- -�L--_'337 5 S__. - --- - _ _ _ _ ._. 3. That this property constitutes the property for which a request for a:(describe request) l�ye o F .k�LL�._�c3�_c�.5_.._�"e,5��t.�►_c.��.5_._�.\e_�e_\__kw�.-�e r w�.��k}-e�c� _.��_�-____ i�t__-�� Gv�N`Z�---�`-►1C�. _V`7e_---�y`—'�-f-,�v�-_�-- Gowi.vuerc_i�1 .�[ev�.e,rc.�l . _. _ 4. That the undersigned(has/have)appointed and(does/do)appoint: �c�.{ �, t/Ift�e-'r�.__ ---r^'".�- t-_(o,Yr,_��.o�-}-a--ec�_�,-- ---- ____ _ _ _. as(his/their)agent(s)to execute any petitions or other documents necessary to affect such petition; 5. That this affidavit has been executed to induce the City of Cieanwater,Florida to consider and act on the above described property; 6. That site visits to the prope�ty are necessary by City representatives in order to process this application and the owner authorizes City representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application; 7. That /w , u dersi ne thority,here�certify that the foregoing is true and correct. ! ��,�_� -- __ __ __ _____ _ ______ __ ___ _____ ___ __ ___ _ _ ___ _ Property wner Property Owner . - - -.__ __ -- ------- --- - -_ __---_____ _---- _ _ _. --- _ _ _ _ __. . _. _ . Property Owner Property Owner STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS � Before me the undersigned,an officer duly commissioned by the laws of the State of Florida,on this j�� day of --- -- ----- - f''�6v�� , 2-Q �� personally appeared ' �"��=-2'r j� � y T o r�j 9 Y 41 ' _ who havin been first dul sworn Deposes and says that he/she fully understands the contents of the a�davit that helshe signed. :�►��- CATHEiiiFdE A�i. GTTA +► ';� ifi�COAAAAI�N#00 946034 ^� :: _ _- - - -- -L��____ _ _ _ _ � � EXPI�ES:AAarct►5. .,^ ;�� 201d - - -_ •.,�� .�4., �n�� Notary Public Signatu e „R,�� . Notary Seal/Stam My Commission Expires: _ 3_ �1_�G�`1__ C:\Documents and Settings\derek.fergusonlDesMoplplenning depl forms 07081FIexible Developmenl(FLD)2008 07-11.doc Page$of'a , . 507 Cedar Street. General Applicabilitv Criteria l. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. The neighborhood consists largely of single story, single family homes. This development is a single story, single farnily home. The street facing fa�ade has detail of lapstrake Hardiplank to appear similar to the surrounding wood siding homes. 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. New development, with its addition of more potential customers, improves the neighborhood demographics which encourages commercial development. Any new development increases property values for surrounding parcels and encourages people to improve their properties. It leads by example. 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use. Residential construction is required by law to be benign. No health related issues exist in residential construction. This design goes further by using environmentally sensitive materials. The construction is intended to be carbon negative, and would qualify for LEED certification. It will absorb more CO2 than is used in its construction. We have also chosen to uses low VOC materials in the finishes to reduce the amount of off'gassing. 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. Residential traffic is far less than commercial traffic. This development replaces a house that was previously on this parcel so its traffic is already contained within the current traffic layout as it exists today. Therefore it will result in zero new traffic. The placernent of the driveway was chosen to alleviate any possible congestion when backing out by not being across from the existing driveway at the small lot to the North. It is almost center to this block of Cedar, and well arvay from the corners of the adjacent streets. 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. The community character is residential in nature, and has been that way for a very long time. The plats and lots were designed to be residential in nature, and by design are too small to accommodate a commercial use. The neighboring properties of 1000, 912, and 906 Garden are all occupied residential, and 913 Ft. Harrison, while currently having a commercial use, is a Residential structure. The other two lots North-West and North of the property are Vacant. The residential use and design proposed fits well in the look and use of the neighborhood. Page 1 of 4 i 6. The design of the proposed development minimized adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts, on adjacent properties. By its nature, there are no adverse effects that pertain to residential use of any property. It will be an attractive new home, however, there will be an insulating cementitious material wall on the West property line, and wood fences on the South and East sides as well for privacy. The house is a conventional style with no unusual architectural features to offend traditionalists. There will be so much liine used in its construction it will actually absorb odors. Its hours of operation are the same as the surrounding houses. Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Proiect Criteria l. The development of redevelopment is otherwise impractical without deviations from the use and/or development standards set forth in this zoning district. The lot is only 3,360 sq.ft. As such it cannot meet any Commercial zoning requirements for parking, minimum lot size, et cetera. Without deviations, development of this lot in any way is impossible. The use of the lot as a detached dwelling makes rnore sense in terms of the neighborhood 2. The development or redevelopment will be consistent with the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan, as well as with the general purpose, intent, and basic planning objectives of this Code, and with the intent and purpose of this zoning district. According to Future Land Use Goal "A.2 GOAL—A SUFFICIENT VARIETY AND AMOUNT OF FUTURE LAND USE CATEGORIES SHALL BE PROVIDED TO ACCOMMODATE PUBLIC DEMAND AND PROMOTE INFILL DEVELOPMENT."A major theme to the Comprehensive plan is reducing undeveloped sites, this development would help move towards that goal in a responsible manner. Also, Policy A.2.2.2 "Residential land uses shall be sited on well-drained soils, in proximity to parks, schools, mass transit and other neighborhood-serving land uses.". This site satisfies all those requirements by being near a bus route, and the local community park on Garden. Another Policy touching on this is A.6.2.2 "Encourage land use conversions on economically underutilized parcels and corridors, and promote redevelopment activities in these areas." The area without a doubt is stagnated. We can only hope this small development might be catalytic in nature. Per A.5.5 Objective— "Promote high quality design standards that support Clearwater's image and contribute to its identity."And Policy:A.5.5.1 "Development should be designed to maintain and support the existing or envisioned character of the neighborhood." We feel that the design of this development is attractive, as well as consistent with the neighborhood using similar finishes and scale. And lastly Objective A.6.9 is particularly applicable to this project. "Decrease energy consumption, use more renewable energy and reduce the impact of the built environment Page 2 of 4 . on the natural environment." And the accompanying Policy A.6.9.2 "Support the construction or renovation of buildings consistent with US Green Building Council's (USGBC) Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED)principles or the (FGBC) Florida Green Building Coalition's Green Land development and building standards." The new-to-Florida materials that we will be using are environmentally responsible and groundbreaking for the state. We hope that this development can be a boilerplate to lead the way in this sort of building technology. 3. The development or redevelopment will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of surrounding properties. The proposed development will actually encourage development of surrounding properties by having activity in the area, showing a willingness of the area to grow and develop. Every attempt was made in its design to reduce the perceived noise within the house so it will live happily in a noisy, bustling urban environment. 4. Adjoining properties will not suffer substantial detriment as a result of the proposed development. The proposal has reasonable setbacks and utilizes fences and a wall for privacy in order to avoid causing any detriment to the neighboring properties. There is no aspect of its design that will affect the neighbors. 5. The proposed use shall otherwise be permitted by the underlying future land use category, by compatible with adjacent land uses, will not substantially alter the essential use characteristics of the neighborhood; and shall demonstrate compliance with one or more of the following objectives: a. The proposed use is permitted in this zoning district as a minimum standard, flexible standard or flexible development use; b. The proposed use would be a significant economic contributar to the City's economic base by diversifying the local economy or by creating jobs; c. The development proposal accommodates the expansion or redevelopment of an existing economic contributor; d. The proposed use provides for the provision of affordable housing; e. The proposed use provides for development or redevelopment in an area that is characterized by other similar development and where a land use plan amendment and rezoning would result in a spot land use or zoning designation; or f. The proposed use provides for the development of a new and/or preservation of a warking waterfront use. e. As you can see from the attached current use map, the vast majority of the neighborhood is Single Farnily Residential, which this project intends to be. 6. Flexibility with regard to use, lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street parking are justified based on demonstrated compliance with all of the following design objectives: Page 3 of 4 r a. The proposed development will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of the surrounding properties for uses permitted in this zoning district; The proposed development will actually encourage development of surrounding properties by having activity in the area, showing a willingness of the area to grow and develop. This project is fully contained within its footprint and has no effects outside of its perimeter b. The proposed development complies with applicable design guidelines adopted by the City; The proposed house is similar in style and architectural language of the houses around it, utilizing a cementitious finish and lap siding. The project is not in any Overlay areas that require more stringent design guidelines, but would fit right in with them and meets all residential codes. c. The design, scale and intensity of the proposed development supports the established or emerging character of an area; This will be an attractive home that fits in the existing residential character of the neighborhood. Attractive homes attract commercial services. d. In order to form a cohesive, visually interesting and attractive appearance, the proposed development incorporates a substantial number of the following design elements: _ Changes in horizontal building planes; _ Use of architectural details such as columns, cornices, stringcourses, pilasters, porticos, balconies, railings, awnings, etc; _ Variety in materials, colors and textures; _ Distinctive fenestration patterns; _ Building setbacks; and Distinctive roofs forms. The proposed home is an attractive single story residence which incorporates a front porch and column, along with nice trim to accentuate its features. It steps appropriately to follow the size and shape of the site, which in turn generates an interesting roofline. We plan to use environmentally beneficial recycled materials with a simulated wood shake appearance. We also used a variety of textures and attractive colors to ensure the home has good "curb appeal". e. The proposed development provides for appropriate buffers, enhanced landscape design and appropriate distances between buildings. The landscape has been designed to be an attractive mixture of low-water, Florida friendly plantings. Page 4 of 4 To Whom It May Concern I have been informed of the proposed residential structure at 507 Cedar St., Clearwater, FL adjacent to my properly, and I have no objection. Signed: L�J'�- Date: G f j �� Ed Chesney owner of parce109/29/15/60102/003/0090 906 N. Garden Ave. Clearwater, FL 33755 / � 'D1�s . G,�,c�C� �� .� T �a� � �' M YERS & ASSOCIATES ARCHITECTURE, AIA, P.A. AA-0003461 ARCHITECTURE • PLANNING • INTERIOR ARCHITECTURE • LANDSCAPE DESIGN • ARBORICULTURE .............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 9I 70 CJakhurst Rd., Suite 3B . Seminc��e, Florida 3377b September 1, 201 1 Tree Preservation Plan Notes Re: 507 Cedar St., Clearwater FL The ratings are written in the foliowing format: Tree number Description Ratinct 1. Variety of Laurel Oak, not much of a tree. Leans toward street -To be removed. 2 2. Old Laurel Oak, could be dangerous- To be removed. 1.5 3. Small Sable Palm could possibly be transplanted -To be removed and saved. 3 4. Split Laurel Oak, could have included bark and rot in split -To be removed. 1.5 5. Small citrus in poor condition-To be removed. 2.2 Other trees off property Sin rely, Jay F. yers, AIA Florida Arborist No. 5542A �- �� , , . i,ii;i",;�;I, :i!p ili�� ii� I �'I Phane: 727-595-7100 Fax: 727-595-7138 E-mail: myersarch a�7ix.netcom.com ��'��u I��, MYERS & ASSOC►ATES ARCHITECTURE, AIA, P.A. AA-0003461 ARCHITECTURE • PLANNING • INTERIOR ARCHITECTURE • LANDSCAPE DESIGN • ARBORICULTURE .........................................._................................................................................................_................................................................................................. .0 I %i._I `.�1C.3Kii'ti(5' i'CLi., J.1':�f.". .z�J - 1 � S .�i^....-f � : 5�:�.'.,i�ilt�ji_; i'"i�✓I�'�i`�..i .i�t� I�� August 31, 2011 RE: 507 Cedar St. Stormwater Narrative The stormwater on-site wiil be handied using swales around the house to drain the water to Cedar, North of the site in question. Sin rely, ---� Jay F. yers, AIA ,��,� Ivuilc �ii)) F'�r�r��: 7�7�59�-7?s�� F�x: ;2�'-��5-7�:38 �-ni�i1: ��yersar�;t�(r�ix.n�tc�ra�.cc�� SECTION 9 , 1'OWNSNIP 29 SOUTH, RANGE 15 EAST, PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA ;: _ Boundary _Survey . � : � . � _ �: ��CEDAR STREET (60' R/W} _ .. . . tiq � �- . . . . � . . . � . . . . � . . ,�. './ � .� �- _� .� - � � . l ¢�' ae �i ti � . . � ��Z°'! '�� 45'CURB `5' �p ,�� . . . .. � . . . . . CURB CUT ,�, . � . ... , .. � � ��: �� *1�" . � Q .. � � . � � - 12" � . � . , . �� . � � � PP � 18'xr* BOX CUT!N CURB � ' � . . . . ' :.� t8M ELEYA110N�30.88'.NAVD t98B . �.. . . � - � . . ' .,FCIt! .. . . '�.. � ' . 5'CONCREIE SIDEWALK ,�� 'y1 .. . . ',1 � . . 2 . �°X4�� __._�� — PCIiE'�� _... A _ _ � FCM LC„ ' `�,.X4 »�R x 76.86'(M) � 129.35'(Nl} 125'(P) r/r�,p ,s. a�xmoe�racE 3 f�""' , --„4'x� �- 'r'\ � a�E ,o�oa�,5• 50.00(M) '�: a� 125(P) �VERALL (�,� I 4 �� »�� 1 � ,� O �/ ��r �U �1,! , ` � � �s r�/ `� �` 0. a -. / � v7 \ c�I , �° � I ., VACANT .-- � � �—�T � ' „��' � ��o-,o• x�'* �,� EAST 75' LOT 10 r�° I � ��.,� \/ BLOCK 3 0 ' / LOT 10 �N LOT 10 �/ � �, co° � y/ � � % BLOCK 3 ��o �v^ BLOCK 3 �� c� /� Q/ / x W �'�'g � C� (� L�GAL DESCRIPTiON: / . ', Y"�`� lOT 10, LESS THE EAST 75.0 FEET THEREOF, A t0�"°B� � '� �•c�sr�toN � � BLOCK 3, IBA NICH4lSON'S AODi110N TO / ti�— �, �sso•as• �.o�Tro 5 � � suur�ar C ARWATE F A. •�' ''�o e�w000�r+ce o.rw �•g'��E 78,14'(M) q xa" 1NEREOF, RECORDEDA NC PL A'T BOOK 2E AGE 44, / ! FcM Q2N 49.86 M �rti .FCM �25'(P� OVERALL ' ^ ^ � .�°� PUBUC RECORDS OF HII.LSBOROUGH COUNTY, ' 4"x4" Q3�, ,,� �' 4"xa" �/ FLORtOA, OF NMICH PINELLAS COUNTY WAS / ,'+ � s��+Y j FORMERLY A PART. x�' x� CLEANWT J � WVERT 2&80' / � FLOOD STA7EMENT: THIS PROPERTY UES IN FLOOD ZONE "X", LOT 9 I ACCORDING TO F.E.M.A FLOOD lNSURANCE RATE MAP �12103C0106H, DATED MAY 17, 2005. ' BLOCK 3 �' LEGEND i CERTlFlED TO: }ROBERT F. CLATON vx .roht ot Gmn�anm�t FlR�Faew hon rtad t c�'� ELEVATtON NQ'[E: ' • �p,p,t,��y�„ � .�yo,vy„ ELEVAT10P15 ARE BASED ON GTY OF " oem v.r o�� +' �rw�u�a�a aro. � CLEARWATER BENCHMARK G-05, -n.asm.d oeeo wv -�a ow�vw• ° rm�°e ELEVATION 4.2325' NAVD 1988. .rm�ome ra.r.�;t aw� : :�� .�� .,:°. . , GUYHALEL4/V�SUR!/EY/NG .�o.e eoo� w�u -r.,n�at�e..,o. P R �� aa e«+t� s t�ete acP _ : ;�;�t;P f!BI,r,- a _�,�, �e� �s,�6° + oo+oits�vAt�a+. Nnw�eee GRAPHIC SCALE CERTIF/CA 170N.' ` `+ �, FP . d Pwmatt GS�Cena�l�9aE n � 1.CUY 0.MAI-E.1HE S11RVkl'OIi W RE�9NSI �� .. R�"°a+""s�s�''��m. s`ac'iw -me� �� 1 = 20 c��,r n�►T n�sim,�v�r�smnm , ' • '� . �;,I r � A90VE GRWND SURVEY AND SKETOi ARE A'IE' . .r � ues:�n..e ue s.� ¢ -c.�e�a�. 0 20' 40� 60' oF ur�cr+o nno�,su.�r,NO�,wQ•ku�� ..:�• � i� aw-s,,,n�s...,wu�a. cn .car r sw�. E3 oa+o�s onx co.so,n�ry a.m aa pr.wav wn. � rxn+ari W 'S'ii�T�i.°'r� --�:� • oexo�s amus , �� x ..� ;,, � ��t��pr=:, Q:�OOA SOUTHBELCHERR0.40 ��n�°ae �:�'»°"„�,,,:,w'�°'"�'x xc oao�s Pwa suRV�r�sue�ct ro� mt�sensai troe�ts, �, .� .1�tE-,11 Q'F+;.��'-"'�LEARWATF'R,FLOR/DA 33765 �GH75-OF-WAY Nffi 07HER MATTERS�RECORO.8ASf5 OF Gt/YQ NALf PL5 flP28 �;.., Y. r '� �a�o��n u�°�o�H�N0 ,xae n+u�ssAxr-� ` ,�ott',�:�,��`727J734�4266FAX(72T)T34-3228 � ! _ _. __ --� --.._.__.__..... , . 1�`t ,.. r ,, .•. _ . .._. . - I _ _ _____.__._ , :_ . _. � b Palm Harbor East Lake .�-��"-� �� . ��1 + pAIM�UFF g �� Oldsmar �'��"� ' � • ) ; t o��ea�� -- � . �� • � • I • �2� r . . . . . . sarecy He�oo� —__ ,. '� r • J � " J`� •~ +—` �� ( � � � ' Ci�arwaMr W. • t; 'L.—• � � �f• � R PALMIBLUFFST�`` 9ell�air yt�i. � �� . —� ./ • - �r+ Bellea�r Beach urgo Feather Sound -- — _-��. p 1 • J� . T ' �'r. � — — �! '.'-� :" • • � • • • ~ ' � K ? 1 . � � . ..._ ... � � I �� : � � q � ' CG • 3� � . � � r � � . • • • I • � � � • � 1 • ;2,� � � J ♦ U E SST Wn�ER SPR1Nfit7 I '� 1 � U � t� ..`,_ � ,/;. �r � l+ f : _ �_ � J R N f`Ei . .. � � ' :F�� -----_ . . � • • • d I d � }f � 6 ,� � �....� � , � � � � . „-.. ; 2�� ''. � . ¢.. ��la� . ( • T t .�_�_� � ... � ��i . • . ' il1 _y� i • � r , y ;. -•-�i.------1._ xr - � � ' � .. : w� METfO ST + . „ � - � . � , . LB�;"' .. � "� ��__��« . ,,....�� •�- „ �. � M, r ..�..� ! � �, . �:� 7 G B *. �` ...��.. ._ .:. . . . • � • • • '� �^ CEOAR 57 2=._ • w� - � � • I §� _ _ . J � � < a 1 � : • • ' � � � + � J, �"� • f .. 2 ' �^. . .. . . ' ', .._----' • t • � 4 <= �� .��.r PALMETTO ST �' : ' � .: '` .... I 1 � .. .. . . . 7 s � • • j 1 , � ' j :t i 5 �-� ,- _._—�� • • • 'i s ! l' � , � ; , , , w r . . �, �v�. � � � 7 W I. . i � � ( s,---- , ' ' :� �`�co ave �`,i • . <' . , . � J W ��`� f ' , , i � r . � . rr � _ . . � _ � ' , . r I, � . . �, > ,:�i :. 3,. � .:. fz � � • • "?� �� x�.+�.+.i�'r"c'iC"'^ ��r' �.w... NiC110LSON ST -. .� � ,.;,r . ; "�L, ;..*+^^'�. � �r�."'�"'��^� -� �r- � � ♦ � . x. „ _ . . �. .�� ...:�. . � ' � • • I CBG _ ,,._... ..; . ; : \ .:�- f w . -~- ` '�_, • i a ' ' �� a • ' - . �NICHOLSON ST".. , � r '- ,_ ,. ...: .� .. _—�- '� "'-+�-� 1 j� „ � �NICHOLSON ST �� I • i I • � • �J • . ��, r , _ ;- � ,� . ' �, . , . . , ,�. �:- .' . f' • � a . , f _ _ i , SFy� f -' � � . ° • • ' aFST • -- + ;�s�r __ ;' p ' :1J 71 -� p_ .c� . :_,_ _ Commercial � Subject Property � Undeveloped � City Park and Playground Residential Cu rrent Uses � Institutional ,.,. ,. _,..; . ._�. _.--�.-.,� . ... ..., . ., .tl....J. .._ . �� i � Palm Harbor East Lake _± � � a T`-�-.�.,.�,,.`^ ; + � Oldsmar • �i� � t 1 ,) � f Dunedin -j � � � ..,� , e + � � � � r I ��_ w � a r w � � � • • • ► • • ♦ � s Safety Harbor �, � � �� , , -_ ��. -�--�;---� r_�� f, , . . �: � C�arwaEer Q � • � c� � � • � �"""'••-W+ � i ---- PALM BLUFF ST f �r; i Belleair �nC�i! • � r ( �� i' �w� � `-�-r� � �r s s � s • � BelleairBeach��9° FeatherSound � Or '; � O j • �..,_. � � �' • � � �L' � � � • • • • � � � ..... ..� � .,.�..:�.,.. �Y I �� ,,�, I 4 �� o , s • ■ • ♦ , �' • i • . . �y�� $�f"' i - SPRING CT� LMDR - �. $j + t� u t�-...,,� � � �� • .URGENS S" P • '' LL � j' � .� 'i . ♦ • e� • . . . . • • � • 'a, 1 r �t� • s � � f �� ` � � � r • J • Jr .: :* . A i� i . f j a � , / 1 1 � • � .t �"T'��"'� � C --1 • f � Yt r � h'E"O5� • . • • • � � • � ♦ �• ♦ �t � + � � "' - _ , �-----.-----�._._.�1 � � �.___.�.�._�,� r ; . � . . . --� CECnR 5' Lj a � � � � � � 1J�'� t f r— 1 � W i � � . • +� �d1 � ' .1��• f °�� , ♦ '� � �� f� i �� MDR 1 � �i—L—� 1�`�"'� � � � ,i,' ' pr,LtAETTOS7 �t �Ir a 1 a ; i 1 � � '� • �_�i� � � • s � y f ' ►- 1 r � . . . • 1 f ) �) ♦ t • i � ♦ I I� : W • ♦ . � f � i ��......�� W • , � " f �I� � I,�/1RC'i0/1VE W 4 • Q • ♦ I� i �� I � I f � �t r'' +' z � � ( l a � • � � � ( � . � ♦ � 1 7 ; • > • f + � � . � � J . . . � ;'' J ; y' a t �r = a . , . . . . , I l __. _ . .� ' . h�cHO�son s'__—' . . . ; ._ ----_ -- --- r-- , — - -- JJJ 8 • • � � � • • • • • ; NICHOLSON ST � O • • � NICHOLSON ST � . • � • • • • • • D • ■ ►- • � • • • . � • � • °7 i i . • � • • • • • z � • � • • • � • � '1 (l7tr'i � • • • • n Zonin Curre t g , •.n -, ;� �� } .... ,, �1� t -a.,� r Palm Harbor Eaet Lske �"`^� � { � � _Y§ � �f � � NAi M p�1�tF'gT",� i `�'a � -r t.� � � � � ''1*si y � II Oldcmar ■_-t � Dunedin --__ .�. � � �1._,,. � � � jj,, �,J • � r f � � ;�� . � + rh RM . a • � a 5afety Harbor j • t+ -�[m� —...! i � / �� e ,� ° f d�� i ,� � !!� ' � : . •�� 3,°---..... ��1 '.�°tw-��...>.,.,...,. tt='r�"" �`" C�Sanva�ar R� �--�j_�• i �, � ♦ 1 � —f� � '.. Pnlh�BLUff ST 0elieair u; j ^��4 � .� � � � ....- - Boll�a�r Boach�arpo Fcather Sound ` �� _� * � p � �'bM ��, � �� ` ^ v • • • . . __�' a ' ,.''��^, y ~� _ • � `g • M � :,w � . ` � � t + { s ■ • • • . ��.. • ♦ � ) �4 � O. ., CG {� �� :. � � - �" : I • �.. —� s /. 2 . : �¢ • �^��...�...s._., :' / � ��.iURGENS�7. + C' + , . ..� . . � ,:, � v1nTER .. SPRING Ci � �R . J�p .�_.,-,...., ? f� � j "�`z�. . « 1�� • o • � `� : • ;,"}'� � � • s �_�� . . i • • � r a � ; �. • • j 1 f � �. � � � � � � �� . • � . ° . �t ` + ��'"'-,r^.$ • •If 1� 1�� , ME7T0 ST �, . , � ...._ � d . �, , �.`R ! r . , . J, /� • ;. �... ..i_ ., ' ._ 1 r, !•' I�: .. • 6 • ��'� O P �,..._ ..__. - 4 .. . . . .. •. �, ' ` � r " �. .w ,w�'A��'_ �r CEOAR S' � i e r 3..� � � �� * � • • �� d $e�% `�� "'� r i� 9� r I « _ . ..� .� ' �.....�,..e.,_....� �-�� • �t� ° r �` Lh!ET � < f � ,t:. • f. � f� � � � � ':-4 . ,��PA TO ST _ � _ ,. . f 4 _._.,,�--,_„_,�_.o... * g � � •� � � ��_•• • « � • W{ • Q � " ♦ �� a E ,... . .,` > w .... � � r�� w 2 ,� �,MARGO AVE j� �I • C e li � � �� w ,+ z rr �._..,�,.,r_i� � . 6 � � '� �' .LL �� > . � • �r� � . . . �, a R li t� ,' Z ! � � � � f "�'� ��g�a'�� NICHOLSON 5T�� J �,�1 e • .• .. _.r,_ + - , , � � - .�-s� � � i • • • • .. . � .. . . C� ..` .�� • • � • • � � '� NICHOLSO!!ST�,. '��. • . p ; ...___,. ... • � �NICHOLSON ST i `� � • ♦ � - • � • � � � � � � "* 0 ♦ .� • � t -j- ♦ � � • � S��O�FST � � � � � � 0 '� )� 7�� .. _ _ _ n Use Future La d EX.6'WOOD 10/14/11 51TE DATR: ..�••' NEW 6' j 8 FENGE TO IZEMAIN-� � �.�'" INSULATMG NO ENVIRONMENTALLY UNIGNJE AREA5. �i � GEMENTITIOUS � �`� LAND AREA:3.360 SQ.FT..O.OS AGRES ��-3" 11'-l" A.. 1�'-0" Wf�LLTO BE za �� _ —— ———— - ,� O EXfSTING DWELLINGS '�`--- �---�.-�'"�-----i`' THE SAME �� <2� ,p 1 PROP05ED DriELLING UNIT5 •�/i' i� MATERIAL f+5 g� �rn � � � ��w 1,4?5 SQ.FT.RESIDENTIAL i.-'�� K i �,i� NOUSE �� ca� � � i i Z 9 NON VEHIGULAR PAVED AREA:1,51?SQ.FT. .�'" �p,� y-�' z ry !p} (INGLUDES BUILDING) ,..-° � 6�jG��F , , �a Q a� '�-� VEHIGULAR AREA:208 SQ.FT.(129b OF Q,:''� b �i -i , / I i p I M P E R V I O U S) i / E -— ———— —- �� PERVIOUS AREA: 1,635 SQ.FT. ( i �jf1� � -A�G PAD � TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA t,'725 SQ.FT. ;i � / � E HARDIPLANK FOR LANDSGAPING,5EE A-2 m ' �/ ,� � � � � Q p � NO F�5EMENTS ON REGORD � � a a � 51DING NORTH �LE1/ATION � MEAN ROOF HEIGHT:12'-2"ABOVE FINISHED i � i C `> a e: = FLOOR(12'-10"P$OVE GRADE) � / / /W I C i� IMPERVIOUS SURFAGE AREA:51.1 9b OF 51TE � w � J I ��t FLOOR AREA RATIO:BUILDING 15 43.9 90 OF 51TE � I / �� w-� ` BEARING POIhtT REQUIREp PARKING-2 SPAGES I � �� E NRO�OSED PARXGKIN6 2 SPAGES(1 IN GARAGE) I� � i _ m �5 � ��µ!N _ ______ ___ _ -EXTERIOR YVALL5 TO BE 12"INSULATING i Ii U� ;,� =m� V GEMEh1TITI0U5 MATERIAL .d ( v W � -WINDOWS TO BE TRIPLE PANE INSULATED _ � 1-( 6-0 �y � � i � tll� � �� r -LIME HARDGOAT RENDER (f) i / / Y � i� -- ---------- BYBl+UMIT.ASTUGCA �Y �� U�� x ------ LIKE FINISH.GOLOR TO O vFi a BE"LOVE 31'!9' � ' PROPOSED 1,4'l 5Q. T. �. 50UTH ELEVATION 6�� 1 STORY FRAME R5IDENGE � I �� a e: _ �.6�wooD I ,� � � � ENVIR05HAKE REGLAIMED F�GE TO REM,41N � / � I en a '; PLASTIG AND RUBBER � � i I _� oyc r � SHAKE LOOKING ROOFING �'' � f-----'�- � � r ,� m I ' � � I ----------�$ � � ;, i u� � � -- -------'----------- WALLTO � � ' � I SETB,4GK Z O ZW ��/ �l O FINI5HE17 FLOOR � � `ti N 0� WOOD FENGE TO �� - �9 - � .- �d F 14'-6" 2 '-9" - 6 Q�U BE 3'IN SETBAGK- + � ------- ---------]��0 � _ ' :�.•• �LL EX.3'WOOD PIGKET �-�------ �� '` H A R D I P L A N K �S T E L..E V A T I O N F E N G E T O R E M A I N.6,4 T E � v� SIDING a e: = ro ee ReMOVEV �.�•� �� ,- ,•�'� � n� �i`' LLwu /i� �y�,�� . . . .::::::.� W ro ,- . .�.�.:::..: .:.:.::......::::.. „ � ' �,55�� 1 5 10 p �� — ------------------- x -FJCISTING � �' cur a cur � �8 � � � �X.�� N --- --------- -------- — � - -: 51TE PL/�N H LIME HARDCAAT RENDEIt BY 51TE LOG/kTION ca e: - `— � BAUMIT,A STUGGO LIKE FIN15H. E�AST ELEVP�TION �R,�� ,� 0 GOLOR TO BE"LOVE 31"19•- a e� = G�/ �� EX.6'YVOOD FENGE TO PINES 10/14/11 REMAIN- � LANDSG,�PE PLA�N H�vwoops ��K Q ca e: ,� � NOTE: se�rrz� ,..._�� N c ��'�'"� �,. PRESERVATION � I 9 '� � �^ EX. 12" • '�� NOTES FOR �' � � �v x �•4�� OAK •'� 5P �� DE5GRIPTIONS OF I �'s L^' GITRUS A,,_.�'"� - � w ' EXI5TIN6 ON-51TE � s� �i �� 5 � � �� .�p.GKi 3 � � ,: TREES�1-5-TO � � � {� ,�n, � y,ec m� �X. 6' 4 �{� 6'S�� BE REMOVED WLGM 9'PRGM 91EM '^� �i' � ��¢ GITRUS � � ��` ` MG 'r / / i �enumc r.�a�ts�a r w�u.de � E � _ s�c+rev.nsr.E uaraw�r r ,�� m � zo � �,��,� � a o :. I /� // � w emra+oF Rmr wee v�or ►� orrvee u+e ,� n'Q c` � ��--� e°"'�rwaws � i�zc � rr�"�Q � � h'— � � F � � � / �� NSUI.ATING �er►ia n Naara� n vu � ��izarrK �1 �� EX. 5" � U1 u+oeneeeeo 7 W l / / �� I i GEMENTITIOUS � � �a'O � e ro s�rmrH zu. GITRUS + J I � / ( WALLTO BE oFnarei+.r.x+e�o 2� E O E �� I � M A T E R I A�E A 5 SHRUB d GROUNDGOVER PLANTING DETAI L MIOOD SP�RRIER DETAIL ►L �µ�N � � I HOUSE N.T.S. N.T9.�� C m x � I � v "� � EX 10"P�htD 10" � I I nnm�^wo rE w�ar+v� w �ai a ' Lf�tJREL OAK � � � '^ � o ( / � � �� c c0 Q� r � \W �9 V F, ¢ 6'WOOD / � ( aN.�u ee etw�aNr H+v ei.+c aes Q y� u. wnaur cucvt�,rn�or wxe, *� ��K � I FENGE TO REMAIN /� �mw+�+e�s.woeooTb � � ' �� PALM �J " rMec r� �•x�•x a�ar,acn W Q¢ 1= f / i � � A11�N'N[T MULGH 9'PROM TRUNK z y�� , Fp( rNtU+9•DErM ,n v. � W � � / I y � d!Y YRG 6ILV 7K1ED�BL009O1� ^ �a � � ,} I �/ � � EX 6"AND 1"1" 6 e"mi`o�iaooe Q � � a�e�oe L.AUREL DAK e ur�ee aR aaurw. �{1 i ENGE TO / 9-]'%4'Xi6"riPOOCNBAT7Etq w � �E 3'IN �'� n i cormec�ran��-a�4�e�.b�v. umnn+neev sa� � SETBAGK '� iNALL TO � rxs•wow awse(s en,nnU .� BE 3'IN ra.x ro enrmr�ern� ,` '/ 5ETBAGK�� in (�J]k4'k96'Y�OOLENSTN� n�E k Z : . . / - oIG.1�ILL b�OIL 6�.MQJN� Q �:• ' � �1� �• �. ItQ7TBN.l. RM+IN OP 711E ROOTBIJ..L'..'RCAO O ;��i� ;:��•�, . �f .: g ,x+s uricbn,�em� TREE PLANTIN6 DETAIL � �p I �y % ZP IG EX 72" LAUREL H»+.�,+�*we � t+.rs. � V or ne rtooreau snaew +.�u.nrov�xr.ee xieucE ae ne rne�eu.e neewrev. � ��li� 2 RGIP2ALL91RM6UORWRCY�VfICDNfOU1DTVINK i �p 3 3 O 9.R@10.�E ALL STRM6.ROPED.1'�RE.Vpt 9TRM65V6CO TO LIFT i11E ROOTBNJ_ � �� "--� ,i•' PALM PLANTING DETAIL �.��wy,�w��ra or rHe reoar euL N.T.9. 3.TO'OF FIXJ76N,L TO BE YR 7 TO I'IHOJG XRROUImING PMIeN bRACE. � � �••i' � GJ_,�,�_K. PROVIDE TREES,SHRUB5 AND PLANTS THAT GOMPLY 1NITH STANDAR.DS OF FLORIDA 6RAVE�1 OR BETTER AS G�VEN � � � y��Y'�" IN GRADES AND STANDARDS FOR NURSERY PLANTS,STATE OF FLORIDA,DEPARTMENT OF A6ftIGULTURE AND w EX. 'Y�CJOD PIGKET FENGE TO�.•�'� GONSUMER SERVIGES.ALL PLANTING�4REA5 AND OTHER AREftiS A5 INDIGATED SHALL REGEfVE A MMIMUM OF 3"OF v IL� REMaIN.6ATE TO BE REM PIHE 5TRAri MULGH.50D TO BE DOT GRADE PENSAGOLA BAHIA GRA55 �W J EX. 12'� PFLOVIDE AUTOMATIG�RRIGATION SY5TEM TO PROVIDE FULL GOVERING OF PLANTIN6 AtJD 50D AREAS ANp U ' PALM--►� SURROUNDING ALL NEN!PLANTIN6 ARE,45. 5Y5TEM TO HAVE RAIN 5EN50R WtTH AUTOMATIG SHUT OFF. � �O� t�L Q��d BOTAIV�P�L � �� KEY C�'Z[` N�tME �iQMMO�I�I�_(�1� �I�F C.ONTAINER 5PL4GING �L"�A_�� w r }- ��N IG 3 Nex cas5ine DAHOON HOLLY 8"GALIPER,8'TO 10'HIGH SINGLE S7EM BaB OR GONTRiNER GROWN AS 5H01^�1 � IV 10 Ilex vomitaria YAllPON HOLLY 18"TO 24"H�GH 3 GAL. NO MORE THAN�'-b"O.G. �, ry ry MG 20 M rica'ceri era YVAx MYt2TLE t8"TO 24"H16H 3 GAL NO MORE THRN 2'-6"O.G. � � LLQ MG 1 M n�oa ran i ora SOU ERN MAGNpLIA 3" ALI ER 12'HIGH 8B OR GON AINER GROWN AS SHONA! SP 3 5able lmett0 GABBAGE PALM 10'TO 14'HIGH GLEAR TRUNK 50LID EARTH BALL NO BOOTS A5 5H01^CJ NOT PIRE SGAftRED � � � ZP 3 Zamia umrla CAONTtE 18"TO 24"HIGH 3 GAL. NO MORE THAN 2'-b"O.G. I = z I '�{ ��,,,.��: k < � 5 �� l �� '�0 �?' r NN � 0�� i i _ ( C Z�rn � �� '==a �z A Cl ' , � _ _�-;�_; �� Ad� I cr-o j ;�� ;{' zA , oc i � ti� �' �-�� 1 l, � .�F �d � Z �t�� ';:a� �� , j �; ' � -r-�' � —t�� I --,-- �_, � z rn � I � ` a � � � � � �A� � � �� I � I d � � • �: k � .. � � •. 't` 1`. r `g I x � I � � � I _ °� ' °� � � o , _ �: �� N I kr z � �� :, �_�_ ,� . . I � �� I � � � 0 .A , _ I � � � � '' o A �g � N I E� � N � �� _ � = J� � ro t u 1�?i � �--� • � � �. n rn � � �� rn � � rn ' ;' ' �� { � { I � I A � ' , ' � � r-� r,-� �. z -� � j r�r� � I r� }� 0 I � 0 � � : I I � � � i � 0 Z � 12'-10" i �� ; ��' ( � h�11D POINT OF ROOF � 9'-4" I TO GRADE / / 1�'-10° ' / / MID POINT OF ROOF TO GRADE �,pLORED ELEVA�TIONS NEW RE5IDENGE FOR JAY F. MYERS p M�. ROBERT GL�YTON MYERS & ASSOCIATES ARCHITECTURE AIA PA 9170 OAKHURST ROAD SUITE 3B SEMINOLE, FLORiDA ARRIE MATTEOL � 50?GEDftR 5T, GLEARYVATER FLORIDA 727-595-7100 FAX 727-595-7138 myersarch��'ix.netcom. 10/14/11 r,,,..�-"'� 51T� DATA: �X. 6' WOOD „r. •~'''.. —N�YV 6' -�r � �ENGE TO REMAIN — ��-�'' IN5UL,4TING � ` � NO ENVIRONMENTALLY UNIQU� AREAS. � �� .,r, ;�'��,r GEMENTITIOUS � � —�0 10-3 11 -� ..�• 13-O W,qLLTO SE o� I �r LAND AR�R: 3,360 5Q. FT. , O.OS AGRES THE SAME �rn Q� O EXISTING DWELLINGS ,..••• �» m R 0 1 PROP05ED DWELLING UNITS .-f'''� �,.. -�'" � HOUSE �AL A5 �c� W� � �W 1,475 5Q. �T. RE5IDENTIAL i ,,,r+,,,,,..• ,' ,.- [i:S ¢ � ��- � Z� NON VEHIGULAR PAV�D ,�REA: 1,51"I SQ.�T. � .-''" -(Qj�`G� ''' �Q � _L ._ _ � ��.__.._.. N 0�, (INGLUDES BUILDING) .,,,,.. " � � �` 5� ,,, � , ��, ti d ____----- � fL VEHIGULAR AREA: �OS SQ.�T. (12% O� , ..-• b ,,,.- "' � j � ' / / , � ` U � � p� IMPERVIOUS) �`.� _ _ � � '� � �. � � .�- � / / ,� � � � ,.._ �a � ~ � _ �� PERVIOUS AR�A: 1,635 SQ.FT. � r,,,,� ,,' ,� ,� %;'� �'✓G PAD o , � TOT�L IMPERVIOUS AREA 1,'125 SQ.�T. I,,..� � ' � %� �/ �� , �/ �� ;� ' ; � � o HA�RDIPL,�NK �'OR LANDSGAPING, 5EE A-2 m�/ ,j � �''`k' f .�,/ / % � � a Q � 51DINC� �/ NORTH ELEVA�TION NO EASEMENTS ON R�GORD ' � �; .% , ; � �i ' a o � MEAN ROOF H�IGHT: 12'-2" A�BOVE �INISHED I I �' ' .f ;�� ' ' • -� /�'� �,', � .� °` Gr� G: _ ' ' ; ' � , a w Ua �LOOR (12'-10' AB0�1E GRADE) � , , /� � i , / , � i ,: , ; u-1 IMPERVIOUS SURFAG� �REA: 51.1 3'o OF SITE � w ( I ! / ' ' � � ,' i � � �/ � " / :!" � a ui � �LOOR AR�A RATIO: BUILDING 15 43.�i 3'o OF 51TE � I .� %'� �`l�'' ` � ` �'� i� ,'"� /� % 1 � � � G �, BEf�RING POINT REQUIR�D PARKING - 2 SPAGES � � !� , � �� '� '�/� / , % ' ' i�,� � z ;, � PROPOSED PARXGKING 2 SPAGES (1 IN�GARAGE) � � I �,;� ,!�; j/�'��' ��,.��% ,,� � � � � '� � � " � _ � � � NOTE: li � I '; /, j L„";,"r'" '� / ct1 W , /� � � �'� ✓ J ',/ /' 1 � Ca - - - - - - - - — - - EXTERIOR WALLS TO BE 12" INSULATING �� ( � ' !' ' " �' ` �� ; ,,� /,`,, ' //' � � = M � GEMENTITIOUS MATERIAL � � f '�, / � ' � / ;!' � � � V F � � m /' �' �� " � /��/� '; � %// � ' � 6'-O� � � o ' /�.%/, � ' � , f�., � � % i'�/ / , o - WINDOWS TO BE TRIPL� PANE INSULAT�D ' � I /'�' � /� � � � I y �n � � � I ;% , �' i / � ,i � � r � � ,� _ - �� LIM� HARDGOAT R�ND�R ((1 � � I �, l ;+s ; F, / ,, , , � ; �, %, ,� % j' %� � Q p � � � � BY SAUMIT, ft STUGGO �t ' ' � � i ,% /� i�,%% • ' , /' , ! �% � ,� V H � -- -- -- -- -- - % / O � •— "' LIK� �IN15H. GOLOR TO ( � �' � PR0�05ED 1,4�5 5Q. �T. � ,�' � m y � w s� ��LOVE 31'19" ` 6'-O" ' J � !�1 STORY FR�ME R5IDENG�`�(, � � x 50UTH ELEVf�TION '� � w ¢ � � , � , , , ,� S ca e: _ �x. 6� wooD ,, i � / � / � , , ,, , , � i � x EN�/IR05HA�KE REGL�IMED ��c� To R�Ma.it� — �I ( , ' �,;�'.� � j �';�;' ,%'.� % �� ,' ' � � °� ° � , , � �;/ PL�hSTIG f�ND RUBBER �� w ( / � ' � � � � / �/� � N � � � �� , �%'� /, � �n SHRKE LOOKING ROOFING � � � � , '� ;�'�' �';'!� �% ,- �- --------,/ ( w � � °� � � � � i i � � � � ` ,� � � I ;, �� ,';,� ,��, , � � � 0 � � �' �� '� ' �- ; �c ••�- � � � ' � ��, -0� � ��'�'� �� ' i r Y- '' \ � �tfl ( y � - - - - — -- -- — -- -- -- - - � � � �� ' !�/�.��/ � � � � ; � � WALL TO � ( , . ,,,,. � � BE 3' IN Z 0 �tU �,,, r ; �� SETBAGK O `- �-'' ' � 4 � FINISHED �LOOR � ;, � � �y 0� WOOD �ENGE TO ..- '"' �� ', „ O � Q i � � `- a" �U BE 3' IN SETBAGK � � 14-6 � 20-�1 � � QQ ' i � � �..._, _ _._. ___. .,�.. ._ �� i i •,,,,. � lL .,r. ...... ...... _... ._.. �,. ...._ .�.... � �_"__"____ ,„r. WEST ELEY,�TION �x. 3' WOOD PIGK�T V � —H�RDIPL,�NK F�NGE TO REMAIN. GATE �' 51DING Ga e: � - TO BE REMOVED �, ^„r,.-�''''' �- , ,,,,,,.• ��~''' 'IL` 1 � ` ,,,,-�� 41.1 J .+r/ I,,��,� :• •:• :•: lU � ; ..r' •.•.•. � ''''� � .•.•. •.•.•.• V _ — __._ _� � -- -_ _. __ , T. __ � � ,�. � �, �\,��r .'1,' .'.5,.' .'10''. � Q u� � �EXISTING Q � 9 ' GURB GUT � �/ � _ � � � � � � - � �� Gv'R8 z � �i _ _ �. _ _ ._.... _ _ ._.. � 51T� �'L,�l�t N � � , LIME HARDGOAT R�NDER BY �'JITE LOG�TION - BAUMIT, A STUGGO LIKE �IN15H. / �ST ELE�IATION ca e: �� .� � O ' G O L O R T O B E "LOY� 31'19" -� c a e: = G� �``' ..- � ..-�'"'y� FJC. 6' WOOD �ENG� TO 10/14/11 L��IDSG�P� PL�1� REMAIN p�,�� -�• ' HA1�WC�C�DS NOT 5 �°� D��L�� ,,,... � ,s��` —� EE TREE R�� o . ca e: _ .,,�••, . . �,� , v- ,,..• � ;� PRESERVATION � � - EX. 12" •:'� �� . NOTES FOR n �' tjj w� �� . 4" p�,K .• � � 5P �',., � �. �z DESGRIPTIONS OF ,J �� o ` GITRUS � �,..�� ' ''' , � . EXISTING ON-51TE � u- w� wQ � . � "�` � GK.,-- 3 � � TREES #1-5 - TO x � # ;�a � �� ' � 5��'' i , _ BE REMO\/ED '� � � � �' QQ ¢ � � EX. 6 � � (� f ,,,•� ' ' ,' j � � = Mu�ct+��P'RONt ST�M9 til '� U GITRUS �� ,,,� -� ', �' %�,' � a MG .�"' / � � i / I PERTILI�t TAB1,P_T3/�5 3"MULGN l.hY�R O O /�' � j � �; �� / / � I 9F'CGIP�D.1°LhCd°_UNIFORMLY � � � " ; 2O '�� l / •.! , � hRGUND RC?t?T M,43ffi � Q � �,� j �� BETI"!'EN M67L?LC MIU rt� Q Q � � f /i / �' / ' � , ( 90R'OM UP RODT Mh59 2/9 F IP LINE lL a � ,�� i� �� / � '�` j' ,/ � / ,/ , w � 4'NTIR4 RII�4IN� .� � c '+ � � / �� f / �' �// / �/��I Y� � SOIL AR�17 PLMITMIb UPRI6HT �_ UPRIGNT Q ,_„1 �< � - / ' � i �� i i �� / � � �' � 7 f T2x2 � PT2X2 �Qt� `J- Ud � /��% �J' � �� /�� i� i ' I � �� F7� � HOIRIZON Pt 1X4 � HORIZONTAL U► � W � EX. 5�� • / /, � i J � � �� % � / �� INSUL,ttTING L'XI5TIN6 _Y� m PT tX4 ,� � I ' � / �; / / , ,• i , i / � UNDI�TUR$CD � W m GITRUS w �/ �� , / ; �� ,/ � � �; � �, � � , �'/ I � GEMENTITIOUS a ro rir�es wm,�,a �o�� £ Q � � � � � i , / ' � �� .: � , �, ��, I WALLTO BE or Rvc�rsn�.L srR� � !11 � '-. � � vcr '�, , " ,� '/ %,. ' , �' , ' � � TH� SAME WOOI7 E3r�1ZRl�R UET,0.1L �- W � �1 � I , , ' ; � ';, � ,� , ',� - � ;� /,: ;'��'� , MATERIAL A5 gHRUB � Gi�C3UNL�GC7VER PLANTING T7ETAIL ---- -- U w`=� �/ l� ' I � 'j %i � / ,� � ' '/; i i � HOUS� N.T.5. N.T.B. Bf°REAL> ~ L � � �'" � i�� % � �� '�/ 1�L �� m 00 (, , / / / � � ,; � - i i / 1�1 � 1 � M .��/ � �� ,'� � / .� � / �� H � � �--� � / � � /� / YRUNt AND TIE FRONDS � � � � � ' ' , ,� � , � , ,/ �, �, ;_ � �X 10" �.ND 10" a � � � � ' � �� ,� ' LAUREL O�IG � { � � ' � ' ' J ~ N � �%� �� ' � �� / ( �- s� Ul � � N i � �,/y � � � � � /�� i � �� i ,�� / �� / �� ( w 4� 2 � ��ly �y i3 � V � r�C , / �i %�� / ', �f � \ i �' / ; / i � , •oyl \ l�/ �X. 6� WOOD , ', �� % /� /// � / �' I TPGUNK SHI�J.L BC 9TRAI6HT hND °sUR IiYONtB Q RU89E�@ HOSE Q (O/� � L�L ; � � WRHCUT GJRV�9,FTiEC OP SGARS, T� (n ^ , I �� NGE TO R�MAIN '� ' % ' �' - � EX 1�� BuRNM��cr,r�va ecao� �ev�nzurnc Q -' , , � ' � ,'��,` � ;' T�SI /�� 3� �1 � a°x�� x a�sr�es � � 8 � � _" Q , �� '� � i � �/� ; � Pl"�LM � AT 130 APAR7 ��MULGH 9"PROM�RUNK W � � l� I,' / / � j / ; � i j'� i � ;' � I MULGH 9"D�PTH z v1 /� ,n � � ' ' �1�• i " � �O bAbk bAI..V T141�D AND WOSLNED �1 � � � W I / •' , /i �' i I � bUY WIR� h1I�TIVE 501L 9AGkl'ILL � W U~� � � / '/ �' : � J'' I EX 6'� AND 1�� a�`2 ra s°iBOVe W � � � , � � % � , � , �r Q � % � ' •' ' �! J CmRP�i�C ��;=-�i�oo� � �� L,�UREL O�K 5 V+YERb OF BURLAl�, �� ;'%';�FENGE TO � .�' � s-�°xa�x�e°wcaofltH BnrreNS ��re.�� ; �;r.---uivaisn�een�oi� W � BE 3 IN i r ''� n y GONNR'Cl'R'D WITN 2-3!/4"ST�@L�3ANf�. i\ �,Y r � IL ��/�SETBAGK � . .-- --WALL TO � _.z,,�,a��woav s�ce r�en,n+�,� �_ � .� :, i, /. , . `` ��_ B� 3� I� NhIL TO BATT�NS 6 SThl�b ,` � ' ' . `' f8J�"x4"x'S6"WC7�i17�N 97MKE5 V � �--'=-� ' � � �-�,t'`�,� SETBAGK nSeNefl � 2 rr+ s�n+e ruvrf+ � Z � � /� � ''�,1 X[ �r/4GKPILL b"901L 5N1G�R A�tGUNJ7 GP 7HE RDOTBAL4 31eR6AD O ROC�'iBhLl- P�LANTMb HdI.P. Q '�: ;;;;�;,,,,, a°�+u�cN�,�r� TREE PL.?�NTIIVG I�ETihIL z Q I +,'. '` 15TIN6 UNDISTUPE6�U SpIL � ,� � �� t+. /� �v ` I v ZP �t� L/� �2�� LAUREL MR�i.3 TIMtB TH�W n�+ ��o o s N n�N G 5 p R U G�O R p I N E P R@ 3 8 U 1 2�T R E A T E D. � " � / QI+7H�ROOTBAL4 9PREhD (� 3 � O� ! � � 9. �MOVL"ALL STFtAPb`RGP��,WIR��CR STTkI�N,9 U5ED 70 LJ�T TH�FtOOTF3ALL, """' � j 1O M6 ,,,,.� � PALM_PLA�NTING DET,�IL 4, 12tMOVE ALL BURI.AP!/O!2 NURE PROM TNE TOP OP THE ROGT BALL, W � , N.7.S` 3, TpP OI"RpOTBhL.L TD�@ 08T Z"70 4"A$pVt 9URROUNDIN6 F'IN19N btQ.,4aE. � , ` � � � �J ,..••/ � �X, �`_,,�\_� PROVIDE TREES, SHRUBS AND PLANTS THAT GOMPLY WITH STAND?.RDS OF �LORlD� 6RL�DE #1 OR BETT�R AS GIVEN � � � -'"" ��Y'�"" IN GRAD�S A1JD STAND?�RDS �Of� NURSERY PLANTS, STAT� O� �LORiDA, DEPARTM�NT OF AGRiGULTURE AND W � � � �X. ' W O O D P I G K�T �E N G� T O�.•�"''� G O N S U M E R S�R V I G�S. A L L P L A N T I U 6 A R�A S A N D O i H�R R R E R S A 5 I N D I G A T E D S H A L L R�G�I V� A M I N I M U M O� 3" O� REMAIN. GATE TO BE REMO�/E —% PINE STRAW MULGH. 50D TO BE DOT GRADE PENSAGOLA BAHIA 6RA55 � � � U EX. 12�� PROVIDE AUTOM,4TIG IRRlGATION SYSTEM TO PROVIDE �ULL GO�/�RING O� P�RNTING RND 50D AREAS AND J � � PL�1�lT LIST PALM —►� SURROUNDIN6 ALL NEW PLANTING AREAS. 5Y5TEM TO HA�E RAIN 5Eiv50R WITH ?�UTOMATIG SHUT 0��. z � O � BOTf�N I GP�L N � � � K Y QTY Nf�M GOMMON N,�N(E 51Z GONT�INER SP�GING REMf�RKS � � � � W � r }- z � u�i ' IG 3 /lex cassine DAHOON HOLLY 3°GALIPER, 8' TO 10' Hi6H 51N6L� STEM B8B OR GONTAI�IER GROWN AS SHOWN � I�/ 10 /lex vomitoria YAUPON HOLLY 18" TO 24" HI6H 3 6AL. NO MORE THAN 2'-6" O.G. � (� ry MG 20 M rica cerifera WAX MYRTL� 18" TO 24" HIGH 3 GA! NO MOR� THAN 2'-6" O.G. � ,� ' MG 1 Ma niloa randiflora 50UTH�RN MAGNOLlA 3" GALIPER, 12' HI6H BdB OR GONTAINER 6ROWN AS SHOWN � 5P 3 5able aimetto GL�BBA6E PALM 10' TO 14' HIGH, GL��R TRUNK SOLID E,�R.TH BALL, NO a00T5 A5 SHOWN NOT �IFZE SGARRED � � � ZP 3 Zamia umila GOONTIE 18" TO 24" HIGH 3 G,4L. NO MORE THAN 2'-6" O.G.