FLD2011-08027; 551 SATURN AVE N; CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY s
�
551 N SATURN AVE
Date Received: 8/1/2011 11 :44:07 AM
Church of Scientology
ZONING DISTRICT: Medium High Density
Residential
LAND USE: Residential High (30 du/acre)
ATLAS PAGE: 279B
PLANNER OF RECORD:
PLANNER: Kevin Nurnberger, Planner III
�
CDB Meeting Date: October 18, 2011
Case Number: FLD2011-08027
Agenda Item: D. 3.
Owner/Applicant: Church of Scientolog,�la� Service Or�anization, Inc
Agent: Cournoyer Construction
Address: 551 North Saturn Avenue
CITY OF CLEARWATER
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
STAFF REPORT
GENERAL INFORMATION:
REQUEST: Flexible Development application to permit an 82 square foot
gatehouse at the entrance to an existing attached dwelling complex in
the Medium High Density Residential (MHDR) District with a front
(west) setback of zero feet (to proposed structure) where 10 feet is
allowable, but may be varied based upon compliance with established
criteria; and no changes to lot size/area, landscaping, parking spaces or
height as a Residential Infill Development Project under the provisions
of Community Development Code Section 2-404.F.
ZONING DISTRICT: Medium High Density Residential (MHDR) District
FUTURE LAND USE
PLAN CATEGORY: Residential High (RH)
PROPERTY USE: Current: Attached Dwellings
Proposed: Attached Dwellings
EXISTING North: Institutional (I) District
SURROUNDING Utility/Infrastructure Faciliry
ZONING AND USES: South: Medium Density Residential (MDR) District
Detached dwellings
East: Medium Density Residential (MDR) District
Attached Dwelling
West: Open Space/Recreation(OS/R)District
Park and Recreational Facilities
ANALYSIS:
Site Location and Existing Conditions:
The 10 acre property is bordered by North Saturn Avenue on its west, Airport Drive on the
south, and North Keene Road on the east. The main entrance is located 338 feet north of the N.
Saturn Avenue and Airport Drive intersection. Situated on this site is the Hacienda Gardens
Apartment Complex which consists of 190 attached dwellings and 290 parking spaces.
To the south, directly across Airport Drive are detached dwellings. Located to the east are
attached dwelling units. To the west is an open space recreational property which consists of
Community Development Board—October 18,2011
FLD201 1-08027—Page 1
ball fields. To the north, is a utility infrastructure facility that consists of the Skycrest Reclaimed
Water System and a nursery maintenance building operated by City of Clearwater.
Development Proposal:
The request is to allow a gatehouse with a zero foot setback at the front (west) property line.
This gatehouse will be located at the main entrance to the Hacienda Gardens Apartment
Complex. An existing gatehouse currently stands approximately fifty feet back from the existing
gate; however the applicants state that over time there have been multiple breeches of security on
the property due to the distance between the gate and gatehouse. This gatehouse will be
removed. The applicant believes that locating the proposed gatehouse at the property line will
allow for easier vehicle identification and less queue time. Moving the gatehouse forward will
provide direct visual and voice contact which will minimize traffic congestion. They state that
the location will also provide increased security for residents by monitoring the street and
sidewalks. The gatehouse will be eighty-two square feet in floor area, eleven feet in height, and it
will be architecturally similar in design and color to the existing buildings on site. It will be of a
Spanish motif with a clay tile roof and stucco exterior walls. This development will not result in
any changes to existing parking, landscaping, impervious surface ratio, and lot size/area.
Impervious Surface Ratio (ISRZ Pursuant to the Countywide Plan Rules and CDC Section 2-
401.1, the maximum allowable ISR is 0.85. The project will not result in any change to the
existing ISR. The current ISR is 0.66 which is consistent with the Code provisions.
Minimum Lot Area and Width: Pursuant to CDC Table 2-404, the minimum lot area
requirement for attached dwellings is 15,000 square feet. The subject property has a lot area of
435,600 square feet (10 acres). The minimum lot width requirement for attached dwellings is
150 feet. The subject property has a lot width of 856.28 feet (along Saturn Avenue), a lot width
of 595 feet (along Airport Drive), and a lot width of 726.76 feet (along Keene Road). The
proposal is consistent with these criteria.
Minimum Setbacks: As previously mentioned, the purpose of this request is to permit an 82
square foot gatehouse with a front (west) setback of zero feet where 10 feet is allowable as a
Residential Infill Project. Be that as it may, pursuant to CDC Table 2-404(3), the development
standards for residential infill projects are guidelines and may be varied based on the specific
criteria in Section 2-404.F. Staff has reviewed the request against the criteria set forth in Section
2-404.F, and has determined the gatehouse warrants further flexibility to allow the structure to be
built at a zero foot setback from the front (west) property line. Staff agrees that the location of
the gatehouse will provide enhanced security for the residents of the apartment complex and that
this request will not cause any harm to or materially reduce the fair market value of abutting
properties. Its design is compatible with adjacent uses and is in keeping with the design of the
existing buildings on site. This request is also consistent with the remaining criteria of Section
2-404.F as shown below in the compliance with flexibility criteria table.
Maximum Buildin�Hei� Pursuant to CDC Table 2-404, the maximum building height for
Residential Infill Projects is 30 feet in height. The proposed height of the gatehouse is 11.0 feet
(to top of roo�. The proposed building height is less than the Code provisions.
Community Development Board—October 18,2011
FLD201 1-08027—Page 2
Minimum Off-Street Parkin�: No parking space is required for the gatehouse. However,
pursuant to CDC Section 3-1406.B, a minimum of 40 feet of clear stacking space shall be
provided in advance of a gatehouse or security gates to ensure that traffic may not back-up into
the public street system. As shown on the submitted partial site plan, an existing queuing lane
that is 60 feet in length runs parallel to the public street near the sites entrance. This distance
exceeds the required linear footage for stacking. Furthermore, it is believed that most of the
residents typically use the scheduled buses provided by the Church of Scientology to go to and
from the apartment complex. Such use of mass private transportation should reduce the
number of vehicles entering the site at any one time. The Traffic Engineering Division found
these existing conditions to be acceptable.
Landscapin�: The applicant is proposing no changes to the existing landscaping.
Solid Waste: The applicant has proposed no changes to the existing method of waste collection.
The proposal has been found to be acceptable by the City's Solid Waste Department.
Si�ht Visibilitv Triangl, es: Pursuant to CDC Section 3-904.A, to minimize hazards at the
driveways, no structures or landscaping may be installed which will obstruct views at a level
between 30 inches above grade and eight feet above grade within 20-foot sight visibility
triangles. The gatehouse will be within the sight triangles; however, Traffic Engineering has
reviewed the proposal and has no issue with the location of the gatehouse.
Code Enforcement Analysis: There are no active Code Enforcement cases for the subject
property.
COMPLIANCE WITH STANDARDS AND CRITERIA:
The following table depicts the consistency of the development proposal with the standards of
the Residential High (RH) land use category and the Medium High Density Residential (MHDR)
District per CDC Section 2-401.1 and Table 2-404:
Standard Proposed Consistent Inconsistent
ISR 0.85 0.66 X
Minimum Lot Area 15,000 sq.ft. 435,600 sq.ft.(10.0 acres) X
Minimum Lot Width 150 feet N. Saturn Ave. 856.28 feet X
Airport Drive 595 feet X
N.Keene Road 726.76 feet X
Minimum Setbacks Front: 10-25 feet West: Zero feet(to structure) X*
South: 20 feet(to pavement) X
32 feet(to structure)
East: 20 feet(to pavement) X
30 feet(to structure)
Side: 0-10 feet North: 8 feet (to building) X
Maximum Height 30 feet 11 feet(to top of gatehouse roofl X
Minimum 40 feet of clear 60 feet of clear stacking space X
Off-Street Parking stacking space
* CDC Table 2-404(3)states that the development standards for residential infill projects are guidelines and may be varied based on the
criteria specific in Section 2-404.F.
Community Development Board—October 18,2011
FLD201 1-08027—Page 3
COMPLIANCE WITH FLEXIBILITY CRITERIA: The following table depicts the
consistency of the development proposal with the Flexibility criteria as per CDC Section 2-404.F
(Residential Infill Redevelopment Project):
Consistent Inconsistent
1. The development or redevelopment is otherwise impractica]without deviations from X
one or more of the following:intensity;other development standards;
2. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a residential infill X
project will not materially reduce the fair market value of abutting properties;
3. The uses within the residential infill project are otherwise permitted in the district; X
4. The uses within the residential infill project are compatible with adjacent land uses; X
5. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a residential infill X
project will upgrade the immediate vicinity of the parce]proposed for development;
6. The design of the proposed residentia] infill project creates a form and function X
which enhances the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel
proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole;
7. Flexibility in regard to lot width,required setbacks, height, off-street parking access X
or other development standards are justified by the benefits to community character
and the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of
Clearwater as a whole.
COMPLIANCE WITH GENERAL STANDARDS FOR LEVEL TWO APPROVALS:
The following table depicts the consistency of the development proposal with the General
Standards for Level Two Approvals as per CDC Section 3-914.A:
Consistent Inconsistent
1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, X
coverage,density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located.
2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage development and use of X
adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof.
3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons X
residing or working in the neighborhood.
4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. X
5. The proposed development is consistent with the community chazacter of the X
immediate vicinity.
6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including X
visual,acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts on adjacent properties.
SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION:
The Development Review Committee (DRC) reviewed the application and supporting materials
at its meeting of September 1, 2011, and deemed the development proposal to be legally
sufficient to move forward to the Community Development Board (CDB), based upon the
following:
Community Development Board—October 18,2011
FLD201 1-08027—Page 4
Findin�s of Fact. The Planning and Development Department, having reviewed all evidence
submitted by the applicant and requirements of the Community Development Code, finds that
there is substantial competent evidence to support the following findings of fact:
1. The 10 acre property is bordered by North Saturn Avenue on its west, Airport Drive on the
south, and North Keene Road on the east.; the main entrance is 338 feet north of the N.
Saturn Avenue and Airport Drive intersection;
2. The subject property is located within the Medium High Density Residential (MHDR}
District and the Residential High(RH) Future Land Use Plan category;
3. The subject property is the location of the Hacienda Gardens Apartment Complex which
consists of a 190 attached dwelling units and 290 parking spaces;
4. The applicants request to be permitted to build an 82 square foot gatehouse with a front
(west) setback of zero feet where 10 feet is allowable;
5. CDC Section 2-404 allows for the development standards for residential infill projects to be
used as guidelines and be varied based on the criteria specific in Section 2-404.F.;
6. In compliance with CDC Section 3-1406.B, the applicants will provide more than the
required 40 feet of clear stacking space in advance of a gatehouse or security gate;
7. The gatehouse will be of similar architectural design and character of existing buildings on
site and it will stand at 11 feet in height(to top of roo�;
8. This development will not result in any changes to existing parking, landscaping, impervious
surface ratio, and lot size/area;
9. Based on the existing character of the surrounding area, the proposed gatehouse is
compatible and consistent with the character of the immediate area; and
10. There are no active Code Enforcement cases for the subject property.
Conclusions of Law. The Planning and Development Department, having made the above
findings of fact, reaches the following conclusions of law:
l. That the development proposal is consistent with the Flexible Development standards as per
Section 2-401.1 and Table 2-404 of the Community Development Code;
2. The proposal is consistent with the criteria of the Residential Infill Projects per CDC Section
2-404.F of the Community Development Code; and
3. That the development proposal is consistent with the General Standards for Level Two
Approvals as per Section 3-914.A of the Community Development Code
Based upon the above, the Planning and Development Department recommends APPROVAL of
Flexible Development application to permit an 82 square foot gatehouse at the entrance to an
existing attached dwelling complex in the Medium High Density Residential (MHDR) District
with a front (west) setback of zero feet (to proposed structure) where 10 feet is allowable, but
may be varied based upon compliance with established criteria; and no changes to lot size/area,
landscaping, parking spaces or height as a Residential Infill Development Project under the
provisions of Community Development Code Section 2-404.F., subject to the following
conditions:
Community Development Board—October 18,2011
FLD201 1-08027—Page 5
Conditions of A�roval:
1. That a building permit be obtained for the building improvements; and
2. That prior to the issuance of any building permits, all outstanding comments from the
Engineering Department shall be addressed.
Prepared by Planning and Development Department Staff:
evin W.Nurnber , Planner III
ATTACHMENTS:Location Map;Aerial Map;Zoning Map;Existing Surrounding Uses Map;and Photographs
S:IPlanning DepartmentlC D BIFLEX(FLD)IPending casesl Up for the next CDBI551 N.Saturn Church of Scientology-Gatehouse(MHDR)-
2011.xx-KWIJIGatehouse Staff Report.docx
Community Development Board—October 18,2011
FLD201 1-08027—Page 6
Kevin W.Nurnberger
100 S Myrtle Avenue
Clearwater,FL 33756
727-562-4567
kevin.nurnber ernmyclea�l�ater.com
PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE
Planner III March 2011 to present
Planner II October 2010 to March 2011
City of Clearwater, Clearwater, Florida
Duties include performing the technical review and preparation of staff reports for various land
development applications, the organization of data and its display in order to track information and
provide status reports, and making presentations to various City Boards and Committees.
Planner
Counry of York, Yorktown, Virginia 2007 to 2009
Reviewed residential, commercial and mixed use development site plans to ensure compliance with
planning, zoning, subdivision, historic preservation, and environmental standards as well as design
criteria, specifications, regulations, codes and ordinances. Led pre-application meetings with residents,
neighborhood organizations, contractors, and developers regarding future projects which included state
and local government agencies.
Site Assistant
Gahan and Long Ltd, Belfast, Northern Ireland 2006 to 2007
Enforced Article 3 of the Planning Order (NI) with land owners, developers and district councils on
procedures relating to archaeological and built heritage remains on proposed development sites. On site
assistant to project manager during the archeological process throughout the pre-development stage.
Development Planner
Versar Inc, Fort Story/Fort Eustis, Virginia 2005 to 2006
Developed survey strategies for the Cultural Resource Manager by reviewing local and state planning
documents, the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Preservation Planning on Federal installations,
the Virginia Department of Historic Resources, the Virginia Department of Transportation plan, and
Virginia Power's public utility plan in the predevelopment stages of new development and building
expansion projects to ensure protection of historic properties.
City Planner
City Planning Commission, New Orleans, Louisiana 2000 to 2005
Primary subdivision planner assisting applicants throughout the subdivision process in accordance with
the zoning and subdivision regulations of the City of New Orleans. Reviewed various zoning and
conditional use applications. Prepared and presented staff reports to the City Planning Commission and
Board of Zoning Adjustments.
EDUCATION
University of New Orleans,LA
MA Urban and Regional Planning(2004)
State University of New York at Buffalo,NY
BA Anthropology(1999)
`.�i � a Q � a � .. _ . _ ,.
, j j LEO LN S
°6 .�. `..� V Q G o <<'' •, �P•.' ,
•.••.�••` SHER1,�(Q� gT � §a"F,ERtN�Ob`� . ;, �
GENYRY �:�� j �• � z
�� � r°Jn a uZi Z .- �-' ���,a..l�m��.t:.S:[ .
�. R Z j O � � � �'.6 a• �'• Y �°
r. ST�'s� � � U t�me� .a �z`��
€`:° °7
p•," "` �s� ST
�E , o ....,...e.�m..m.�
,�s.f,� '€ WEBB DR ;�:
�
t � �YST�'�<" a a a � GRAND AVE �7:J
„`,�..t m � v' �'i
,a E�$ � U
��� � �
,pd s...%� -
°."°•."`"`°"" O PA�METTO ST �
\J
ST W PROJECT
sr a � SI TE
a �
�I 1
�
DR
�ichards Gt CASLER T �
AIRPORT DR Z M
� p�� � KENNETH W tree O ��
i¢, w
�
W �a � d �
SF � U � � `, � GILBERT m ST ��
RIDGEWOOD �Z
RIDGEWOOD ST q
MCKINLEY %
ST
HAROING
�
q PLAZA
U '� �
Z
IiARDING ST � �
� O� W { OREW U
Q PI AZA
� � SR-590 DREW
w
ST Q
�
O
LOCATION
Owner: Church of Scientology Case: FLD201 1-08027
Flag Service Organization, Inc.
Site: 551 North Saturn Ave. Property Size: 10.29 acres
PIN: 11-29-15-00000-410-0300 Atlas Page: 279B
f028
1006 1005 �024 f007 Q
1016 10 Q�
I o , ,008 �
� R ,000 W a �
,000 ,00� W �, �
Y ? z
� 2
�
901 I osrR
I � � ^
� � � � � � � � �
soo ' `° °° �
i i
� y 51
i �i
i � �MHDR � � 829
OS/R 714 + ± � 82�
� � ! 825
� � �
�' 823
� i Z 821
�y �
i 551 � Y 701 629
� � � 627
� r*
� i 625
i � 647 645 643 641 � � 623
� � � ^ 621
■
■
+ ■ o 0 0 0 ^ M v> i.
�Hia���-FL���-��-{�����;��-/i-� � � � �o �o �n m � �o
550 ��fa�/ ■!
51 �51 519 �
O�� N <o
��^ � � � ^ ^ 517 �N ro ro m m �' � 525
51 515 S� �o � ��
� ^ ENNETH PL' 511 S'PS 55�5 Z �'B ^ W s,s
50 Q �9 508 509 W ,p W 513
Z 509 � 505 `,�OB W 507 W 1 1Aw �'
50 Q 9 507 �3 502 ' 503 I � �i � � 507 .
V � 50� soo Q so� Z W so, i
41� 503 50 � �� 41 415 414 y 415 1B5 a � a M 431
415 q� 413 412 � 413 °p � °J °D � 1
40 O 415 41 411 40 409 408 Q 411 18 ¢ 425
4 I �9 qp 407 40 407 406 � 407 n W 419 i
40 r �
ZONING
Owner: Church of Scientology Case: FLD201 1-08027
Flag Service Organization, Inc.
Site: 551 North Saturn Ave. Property Size: 10.29 acres
PIN: 11-29-15-00000-410-0300 Atlas Page: 279B
�oss
1,�08 1005 1018 ��
1005
° 1000 W 1001 1008 1003 � d
m �. � � ' �e 1000
" Q 1000 1001 � �;
9 ? 2
n �
�
.. F�
f/j 901
Z O
5.1� Ac�c�
3240 0 �
J11J-!-/-■�Jia-�
M e� � O� 1. v1 q �
� � ���� � � � �
9�0
51
O q �M
��
� � �� 82
19.51 Ac�q 7,�4 82
82
o $2
O 821
7029 Ac�c� �
0
551 �p g2
� 82
� ! 825
7845 643 641 m m 823
i L��an � 821
■
■ t� q b 1� �
� m m m m � � ��
m m m m
550
A/RPORT DR
�s 5� �e n�^ i� +N � eon� m 517ai � N o '7 a�o 525
" " " " �' `r•` 51 "s� �� 11 � e� � � � � r' � '
p 5 KENNETH PL 13� s'6 5y'�y 15 ' � �s 2
5 50918 508 509 ° � " � W �i3
z, a 50 50� n �0 5��� 508 W 507 1° Q s 18 8 � � � �
50 50� 507 50 g03„ 8502 � 503 � ,0 18 2 " 1e '� � � Sb7 3
zz 50 e, �. 5017 500 Q 501 13 lV a' `.}�1 <
4 4 50�" " 50 3 25 41 �3�s 414 y 415 Z » 18 �a �'� " ^8 W q�1
� 415 41 413 m412 Q 413 " W �-° � � � � 1
41543 ,z �� � 409 5 408 Q 411 � 1z�85 Q 4�5 s
za 409 � 411 n 4 '° �'408 � 407 " _ � �g 6
" 4 Z
EX ISTING CONDITIONS
Owner: Church of Scientology Case: FLD201 1-08027
Flag Service Organization, Inc.
Site: 551 North Saturn Ave. Property Size: 10.29 acres
PIN: 11-29-15-00000-410-0300 Atlas Page: 279B
--_ -_ _ __
�; y
A ���s �� �'�, _ .!�iR +� 1� �'- ��t '�' '� �;.
: °� R���`y, y� � � y'� i� � � � � 'J� �► t ����� s. ,
�"'�"S,, � �R" `i. y iS�; ,"�4 �.!�" �'4:°..�� x i}� ..,� � � � 'l o �`
,
.
r a '�
�
��,� � 0 " o�.. �' ,+'� , �� '�pr ��� '� 4. {"
� . �., �� !' M � • . � �� `4
;\� �t ' , � , c � .• �� R� �� '�rw.
�4�� � .\�:' \.. "`1p'S, -1 �k .�' , .. �.
�� �� � � .w+rdw�.�� � , '.� �� *�i. � �
.f p r ���-"''"�k�i !� } . ,� + �, '�
. . ��r �, � , �
� �4. � J\ � },���� ,�—� �y . �. i . � ti � �u
��� ;� w1, t � �� y„ 1 �' > �' � � �.
T �,tt�` .., . ���: �� �,�� ��' ,:� f. .
�E P
.�,r�� i �F�. �,�J
� ►�rl 5 �. �
. 'M��. ,$:� 4.��. •����a_ ,�,��'���^"" `°'�,�� y,,;,'� r.. .,� �;R ' .
t c' .NL .t t t s ktt i; C
e
R � 4 .
_ r �4►
,t.
�: � � �
_ .
. �i ��` . �t.._
n: .
,. +R ,
..
�:�:�- �, ' � �r � , k�,.
•�, \ ' .. r " :
x� .V`� .,. },.�,� J�.,.�:. : ,c .� �� �i�t�.
�
��yc,��
, � N �
� �? � �' � �
� � .. � ��`"�. \ , r y�' :,�.. r ��, _ ,�,;.,
...'t � '('�n, �: I 1 .
> ' . � �,.ri , �'W' �a�l. �II . .� ��`•. ,
..,t i d� �. --� = } r,
� ; �` � � ��' e' � ^�.: ' , 1' !�
�\ \ •u .a,.r3 h
� . h. � ° '?a y
� �� � � � � f
� . � , .. h�, ��� � `� � '}� . � '� � i
,•� ' � � � � w� �
t;�� ��. �.�� � <r� ,� �"; �� � � „ a, ��„ „ { , ,. � �;�
,�. _ . 1x'�,^�•.'��l, +�e • ,�► �� .'Q" ► .,��^ t1Ft#-� '�'�
't�r ����.1����, P ti i �' ��
�r �� �� ' �..�. ..` �... • . . �� � i.�A 1 ti+.
��. f'���`� .; � �y 8
-+g 1 a
"` � ♦� aJ,i L f •a h
. � � � � � � ��� q ��°,�- � �,
a � . .l' . l t��... r � I � �
�� � � _'� �L-7�'• n « ;� , �� f' �� ;;� � a����� ' , � � � ,�;�
,
�. .
�, a � „
„
i-�i¢*
xfl, _ ; . , , . • ° �J '—'J.l
t
. ,�
� ,. -
� • jr
h. ., ': .,. . � "� . � � ��.
: � m
� .
�`w
t _ � ,� . � � p � '� � f � {k, v.► �a� � . �.
` �
Tt ,~ �.
'� � r}�M�.t l ��* , � ,I..
� � -��,. i ,�. -��r.. �:
� �, �;. . ,- � �,�,V � , -�.� t
..�'s �:t� , �, � � � � � � �� �. :t
. . . : -� •
_l, �... ;�; • }
�l � � y :. � �,� . : � ; � ,
;T , � - _J` !#' �, ; +�,f ,, � � � t� ,
�b� � P¢ '1�„ �f<" rC. �,� 1,�5!
AERIAL
Owner: Church of Scientology Case: FLD201 1-08027
Flag Service Organization, Inc.
Site: 551 North Saturn Ave. Property Size: 10.29 acres
PIN: 11-29-15-00000-410-0300 Atlas Page: 279B
_ ,
�, � �=.}
,�. .�� �� , _ �
�..,_
, 9- "
j,, _ _, _. � .:,
4 :��. ,�° ,
,„ �
_ ._._.� ��� �
� a�t
� �.���
f �:� �,fi,�� -
�6 "'�`sk 'T �.xT.. •<V, 'i«� ;i$k+#3 ���`ux4W .,
_ _ Tw� �� '�`�. �F.. w,$
.+.....i: .:.. , ...r .;. ..
_ _. ux
.. _ . _:.... e . .`��� .. .
Looking E at subject property. Looking E at subject property
'� ��
F
ir.r�
' _ �
..�_....._: .. .
• .b -
��� �; �! � .
M�..
�: __ �
, ,. _ _
r..�< _. ,
_. ,,1,,,. �
. ,
, .
i , ., ,,
� �'r.,;qa�,w ,��`•`'y�', .
� �� '"y�� � '
�-+:. _, ..�
Looking NE at subject property queuing lane Looking S along Saturn Ave. at subject propertics entrance.
,,�� �
_ �
<
�
" „ "' ,�'
�,
i _ �, .�
� : �� . � '.�
.
, . . ..�
--�� � - �.�.
„ ,
Y. �h � y _.,,Y
11'��'��'��'��'���p���� ���a�.���� x.�._.�,,��t
� „
_ _ � ~.�,,�,:�,;
'" " � _ ," „��,s�����
,
. _ - „�,�:�-wr �,,�,
. : �:+�
T .
., � A�.. , „�;, , � �,� --'�'�,'��y.c. .z ..�..: .. ,. .
�� }
. ��p��i � ' �,Ya' .�,yt�r�=�.� �..:
. �...:�,:e� �� .. 4 . , ,...:;.�n'.c. ....,
Looking N along Saturn Ave. Looking Eat subject property.
551 Saturn Avenue
FLD2011-08027
���7€�Gh ����I��t7�?L��l' � ��PVICE fli�GAP�3Z�aT(t7h 1��.
8 September, 2011
Mr. Robert Tefft
Planning Department
City of Clearwater
100 South Myrtle Avenue
Clearwater, FL 33756
Re: Hacienda Gardens Main Entrance Guard Booth Development
Application FLD201 1-08027 - 551 N. Saturn Ave
Dear Mr. Tefft,
Please accept our application for reduced set-back for the main
entrance guard booth at Hacienda Gardens.
This application consists of:
(15) Application with Written Submittal Requirements attached
(15) Property deed
(15) Stormwater narrative with photo of existing conditions
(15) Boundary survey
(15) 11x17 Area plan, Existing plan and Proposed plan
(15) Colored elevations
(15) 8 1/2 x 11 reduced plans and elevations
(15) Landscape narrative with o of existing conditions
If you have any questi s need additional information please
do not hesitate to email o cal 38-9088.
Sincerely
e�%_
James Bond
Church of Scientology
503 CLEVELAND STREET • CLEARWATER • FLORIDA • 33755
727-638-9088 • FAX 727-445-7277
_ Planning 8� Development CASE#:
� ' Y De artment
J � � P RECElVED BY (staff initials):
` 10.� South Myrtte Avenue DATE RECEIVED:
: • ����� Y��� _ __
Clearwater, rtorida 33756
� Telephane:.727-562-4567
Fax: 727-562-486�
] BUBMIT ORIGI�JALSIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION
] SUBMIT 14 COPIES OF THE ORIGINALAPPLICATION-Plans and
application are required to be coilated,stapled,and folded into sets
� UBMIT FIRE PRE�IMARY SITE PLAN:$20D:00
9 SUBMITARPUGATION FEE� ���
` NOTE:15fiOTAL SETS QF INFORMATION REQUIRED (APPLICATIONS PWS SITE PLAN SETS)
�L�X�BLE DEVEL�PMENT ,��P��CA'�'�QI�
Residential I�11 Project
(Revised 05.04.2010)
PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT�
�. ARP..LfCANT,;RRORER7Y OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATIOl�: (Code Section �4-202.A)
�PPLIGANTN;Ah11E: �LCyCtt� (.t' �!_lTJV IIJLVL.F1` t—L.tf'�.t� �V�t-� ���-t'�eV�L.f�f L� �L4V�
AAILING ADDRESS: SQ;3 C��N� c�'T' �.(,� � 3 7
'HONE NUMBER: (�3g`�D�j F NUMBER: ��� 7?
;cLL NIJMBER r L/ EMAIL: � a,�,{Q,SOC�VI- C' . CAS, G[
'ROPERN OWNER(5): I GtE(d12f..1� 6� SC..��.)l��y ���i S�GL C�KE#GCl'�.1 ZGL'C'1lll�l � �L.
.isiALL owners on:the.deed j
�
1GENT NAME: [����� ����,[��i
AAILINGADDRESS: �[k-�� C����4��'� (��.f �( 33���
�HONE NUMBER: 4,L� � �-j a( FP,X NUMBER:
',ELL NUMBER: L�.�(���� EMAIL:
3. •PROPOSED:DEVELOPMENT INFORMATIOt�: (Cod.e Section 4-202.A}
�ROJECT NAME: ���� �� ��(u(� PROJECT VALUATION: $ � ��
— �
3TREET ADDRESS
/� / __ __. .___._. _ . _ . ___
�ARC�LNUMBER(S):__ _-�� Z� / J�l D ��O __
?ARCEL SIZE(acres): PARCEL SIZE(sguare feet): � (/�
_�sl(�S s
_EGAL DESCRIP'flOt�: S{{pQ,'[' (�[��L �N(J�(,(((�eD, W►?�__ "'
�t�I i «(,�4 S 16 _
�ROPOSED USE(S): �� � ��51 N[�-; �Sl/JE�()� k'L4{L,�'-E. 7��GuL!
_ --. _ _ :_ _ ......_ _-_.. __ _ ,_._ ____� _
�ESCRIPTION OF REQUEST: �;Q;,�C{'"((� (� 5���[,� �C> Q,S / �_ ��n}(� �(,(�(� ��-
5pecificaily identif��the request � T � �~+
'include number of units or square ---
=ootage of non-residential use and ali
-equested code deviations;e.p.
•eduction in required number of — ---
�arking spaces,specificuse, etc.)
, 5:\Planning DepartmentWpplication Forms\Development Review1201D Forms updaied with new Departmen?name\Residenlial�Infill Project�FLD)520'IO.doc
Page] of 8
)OES TMlS APPLICATION INVOLVE THc TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS.(TDR),A P �VIOUSLY APPROVED PLANNED UNIT
)EVELOPMENT, OR A PREVI�USLY APPROVED(CERTIFtED)SITE PLAN? YES HD_ (if yes,attach a copy of the applicable documents)
� ROOF lJF fJWNERSHIP: (Gode Section 4=20.2.A.5)
.
S.UBMIT A COPY OF THETITLE INSIJRANCE POLICY, QEED TO THE PROPERTY UR SIGN AFFIDAVIT ATTESTING OWNERSHIP
(see page 7) k�r�n Shj�;�,(�,�
__ _— _.._.._- - -- ---- ----
___ ___._ . __ _ _ _
�. - RIT7'�I�SU.BMtTT-ALREQ.UIRE'MENTS,..(Go_de.Secfi�n 3-91�.A)
Provide complete responses to the six(6)GFNERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA—Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail:
I. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale,bulk,coverage,density and character of adjacent properties in which
it is located.
,��.L. 2�S(�I�� �. �T'r�:#�.� s�;Pfl���'rT�LY
?. The.proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly
impair the va�ue therepf.
3. The proposed development will not adversely afrect the heatth or safety or persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use.
4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion.
5. The proposed deuelopment is consistent with the community charecter of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for devefopment.
6. The design of#he proposed development minimizes adverse effects, inciuding visual,acoustic and oliactory and hours of operation impacts, '
on adjacent properties.
_ _ _.._ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ . ___ . _ _ _ _ s
S:\Ptanning Departmenri4pplication Fortns\Development Review12010 Fortns upda�ed with new Department name\Residential Infill Projed(FLD)5.2010.doc
Paee 2 of S
WRi EN SUBtVI1TTA�RFQEJIREMENTS: (FResidential infi[I Pcaject Griteria:}
__
Provide complete responses to theseven(7)RESIDENTIAL INFICC"PRQJECT CRITERIA=Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detaiL
1. The devefopment or tedevelopment ofthe pareel-Proposed for development is otherwise-impractical-without-deviations from the intensity and
development standards.
/�t�.S� Q�R��, -�I�� �.�'�".����'��`".�.
�
2. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a residential infill project will not materiaily reduce the fait market value of abutting
propeities:(Include'fhe existing value of the site and the proPosed value of the site with•the improvements.)
3. The uses within the residential infill project are otherwise permitted in the City of Clearvrater.
4. The uses or mix of use within the residential infill project are compatible with adjacent land uses.
5. The development ofthe parcei Proposed':for development as a residential infili project wiil upgrade#he immediatevicinity�fthe parcel proposed
fordevelonment:
6: The design of.the-proposed residential-infill project.creates.a form.and function that enhances the_community_character of the.immediate vicinity of ,
the paroel:proposed for:deuelopment:and�the City of;Clearwater as a whole.
_ _ _ . ------
_ _ . ---- -- __ _ _.__ _ __
_ —
— _ _
7. Flexibility in regard to lot width„ required setbacks,height and off-street parkiqg are justified.by the benefts to community character and the
immediate vicinity of the par�el,proposed for:development and the.City of Cleanvater as a whole.
S:1Planning DepartmentlApplication Fortnsl�evelopmeni RevieW�2D10 Fortns updateC wilh new Deparimenl name\Residential Infilt Proiect(FLD)520'IO.doc
Pa�e 3 of S '
E. STORMWATER PLAN SUBMITTAL REQl11REMEt�TS: (Gity of Ctearwater StQrm Drainage Design Criteria
Manuat and 4-202.A.21)
� A STORMWATER'NARR/�TIVE MUST BE S.UBMITTED WITH ALL i4PPLIGATIONS.All appiications that involve addition
or modification of impervious surface, induding buildings,-must include-a stormwater-plan-:that-.demonstrates .compliance-with_.the-_City .of_
earwater Storm Drainage Design Criteria manual.A reduction in impervious surface area does not qualify as an exemption to this requirement.
If a plan is not required,the narrative shall provide an explanation as to why the site is exempt.
� At a minimum,the STORMWATER PLAN shall include the following;
� Existing topography extending 50 feet beyond all property lines;
� ProPosed grading-inelucling-finished floor-elevations of-all-structu�es; -
� Ali adjacent streets and municipal storm systems;
� Proposed stormwater detention/retention area including.top of bank,toe of slope and outlet control steucture;
� A narrative describing the proposed stormwater control pfan including all calculations and data necessary to demonstrate eompliance with
the City manual.
� Proposed storrnwater detention/retention area including top of bank,toe of slope and outlet control structure;
� Signature and seal of Florida Registered Professional Engineer on all plans and caiculations.
� COPY OF PERMIT INQUIRY LE"i fER OR SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT (SWFWMD) PERMIT
SUBMITfAL(SWFVVMD approval is required prior to issuance of City Building PeRnit),if applicable
� ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF STORMWATER PLAN REQUIREMENTS(Applicantmust initial ons of the folfowing}: ,
Stormwater plan as noted above is included
Stormwater plan is not required and expianation narrative is attached. At a minimum, a grading plan and finished floor
elevations shail be provided.
CAUTION - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A ST�RM\NATER PLAN
AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMiTTED,APPLICATION Ml1ST BE RESEIBMITTED AND StGNtFICANT D�ELAY
MAY OCCUR.
If you have questions regarding these requirements,contact the City Public Works Administration�ngineering Department at{727)562-4750.
F. SIJPPLEMENTAL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS.: (C�de Section 4-202.A)
yt" SIGNED.AND SEALED SURVEY(including legal description of property)-�ne original and 14:copies;
❑ TREE SURVEY {inciuding existing trees on site and within 25'of the adjacent site,.by species,size.(DBH 4"or greater),and focation,
including drip lines and indicating trees to be removed)-please design around the existing irees;
❑ TREE INVENTORY; prepared by a "certified arborisY', of all trees 4" DBH or greate4.reflecting size, canopy (drip lines) and
condifion ofsuch trees; �� � � �.� -� 'j--�f )
/
� LOCATI�N.MAP OF THE PROPERTY;
❑ PARKING DEMAND STUDY in conjunetion with a request to make deviations to the parking standards ,(ie. Red.uce number of spaces).
_ __.Prior t�the submittal of this application,the methodology of such study shall be approved by the Community Development Coordinator and
- -- - - _- -
shall be in acaordance with accepted 4raffic engineering principles. The findings of the study will be used in determirtin,g whether or not
deviations to the parking standards are approved;
��(2� (S P�0 C�Eftlu�,� LN �R.�fi1�!a�
� GRADING PLA�I,as appficable;
� PRELIMINARY PLAT, as required(Note: Buifding,permits will not be issued unfil evidence of recording a final plat is provided;;
.. ;
D __ ._ _._ _ _ ___ .
COPY OF R�CORDED PLAT,as appiicable;
5:\Planning DepartmentlApplicalion FormslDevelopment Review12010 Forms updated with new Department name\Residential1n51i Project(FLD)5.20'ID.doc
Page 4 of S
G. SITE PLAN SUBMITT,4L REQt11REME�TS: (Section 4-2Q2.A)
� _
SITE PLAN with the following information(not to exceed 2�'"x 36"):
Index sheet reterencing individual sheets included in package;
North arrow;
Engineering bar scale(minimum scale one inch-equals 50 feet),.and date prepared;
All dimensions,
Footprint and size of all EXISTING buildings and structures;
�. -
Footprint and size of all PROPOSED buildings antl structure5;
All required setbacks;
All existing and proposed points of access;
All required sight triangles;
� Identification of environmentally unique areas, such as watercourses, wetlands, tree masse5, and specimen tcees, including
description and location of understory,ground cover vegetation and wildlife habitats,etc;Location of all pubiic and private easements;
Location of all street rights-of-way within and adjacenfto the site;
L�cation �f existing public and private utilities, including fire hydrants, storm and sanitary sewer lines,manholes and lift stations, gas
and water fines;
^ All parking spaces,driveways,loading areas and vehicular use areas;
� Depiction by shading or crosshatching of all required parking lot interior landscaped areas;
Location ofall solid waste containers, recycling or trash handling areas and outside mechanical equipment and aU reqaired screening
{per Section 3-201(D)(i)and Index#701};
Location of all tandscape materiat;
Location of all onsite and offsite storm-water management facilities;
Location of all outdoor lighting fixtures,
Location of all existing and proposed sidewalks; and
Floor plan typicals of buildings for all Level One(flexible standard development)and Level Two approvals. A floor plan ofi each floor is
required for any parking garage requiring a Levei One(minimum standard and flexi6le standard)or Level Two apProval.
� SfTE DATA TABLE for existing,required,and proposed development,in written/tabular form:
EXlSTING � REQUIRED RROP SSED
�I LdIIU$ICH i�i�yi.idiE icEi'aiiu cGicS; `�K ���� �
� Number of EXISTING dwelling units; � '`'L� _
�/ Number of PROPOSED dweliing units; L°t� �
_,C Gross floor area devoted to each use; �(Q�� _ �
Parking spaces: total number, presented in tabular form with the
� number of required spaces, 2-�� _
Total_paved_area, including ail paved parking spaces 8 driveways,
expressed in square feet&percentage of the paved�ehicular area;
Official records book and page numbers of all existing u.tility �
easement; �� 7—
✓ Building and structure heights; �Z-`t�''r}�
� Impermeablesurface catio(I.S.R.);and �6 (C�
� Floor area ratio(F.A.R.)for all nonresidential uses. �
REDUCED COLOR SfTE-PLAN to scale(8"/z X 11); -- - - -- - " --- —
� 7� �
� FOR DEVELOPMENTS OVER ONE ACRE,provide the#ollowing additional infiormation on site plan: /
�
One-foot contours or spot elevations on site;
Offsite elevations if required#o evaluate the proposed stormwater management for the parcel;
All open space areas;
__--,� _ ___ ---
_._ _ _. _ _ __. .. .. .... __ _ _. _
_. _ .
Location of all earth or water rstaining walls and earth berms,
Lot lines and building lines(dimensioned);
Streets and drives(dimensioned);
Building and structural setbacks(dimensioned);
Structurai overhangs;
S:\Planning Depanmen6Application Fortns\Developmenl Review12070 Forms updaled with new Department name\Residential Infill Project(FLD)5.2D10.doc
Pase 5 of S
H. LANDSCAPING PLAN S[1BMtTrAL REQUI:RENfENTS: ESectinn 411�2:A)
__ __ .- -n,/�,,yy,��-/� �, '/�, e�v . ���..
� LANDSCAPE PLAN with theiollowing information(notto exceed 2S"x 3.0"): �(� r�4lFU�'_t.1 L�C�TfY�� ����`'�r�
Ail existing and proposed structures,
Names of abutting streets;
Drainage-and retention-areas induding.swales,.sideslopes.and_bottom elevations;
Delineation and dimensions of all required perimeter landscape buffers;
��..
Sight visibility triangles;
Delineation and dimension"s"ofall pa�king areas including landscaping istands and-curbing; - -
� Existing trees on-site-and-immediatefy adjacent-to-the site, by species;size and locations, including driPlines{as indicated on required
tree.survey);
� Location, size, and quantities of ail existing and proposed fandscape materials, indicated by a key relating to the plant
schedule;
Plant schedule with a-key (symboi or tabel)indicating the size,description, specifications, quantities, and spacing rsquirements of all
existing and proposed{andscape materials,including botanical and common names
^ Typicai pkanting details for trees, palms, shrutas and ground cover plants including instructions, soil mixes, backfilling, mulchin.g and
protective measures,
Interior landscaping areas hatched and/or shaded and labeied and interior landscape coverage, expressing in both square Teet and
peraentage covered;
^ Conditions of a previous development approval(e.g.conditions imposed by the Community Development Board);
irrigation notes.
� REDUCED COLOR LANDSCAPE PLAN to scale(8'/�X 11);
❑ GOMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM application, as app(icable. Landscape assowiated with the Gomprehensive
Landscape Program shail exceed minimum Code requirements to ofFset the areas where minimum Code will not be met.
L BUILDWG ELEVATION-PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Secti.on 4-202.A.23} .
+� BUILDING ELEVATION DRAWINGS—with the following information;
� All sides of ail buildings;
�-----777��� Dimensioned;
�Colors(provide one fuii sized set ofi colored elevations);
Materials;
REDUCED BUILDING ELEVATIO)>!S—same as above to scale on 8'/z X 11.
J. S)GNAGE: (Division 1'9.SiGt�S l Section 3-1806) ,� ����� s���� �����
– ------ _ - --.—, - - -
O Ail EXlSTING freestanding and attached stgns; Provide photographs and-dimensions Zarea,height, etc:);indicate Whether theyw.ill-be -- ' -- ---- —
removed or to remain.
O All Pr�OP05ED frees.anding :and attached signs, Provide details including io�ation, size, height, colors, materials and drawing;
treestanding signs shall inclutlethe street addrsss(numerals)
� C�mprehensive Sign Pro,gram application,as-applicable(separate appfication and#ee required).
;
� Reduced signage proposal(8 Yz X 11)(color),if submitting Comprehensive Sign Program appfication.
�S:1Planning DepartmentlAppiication Fortns\Development Review12010 Forms updated with new Department name\Residentiai Infill Project(FLD)52D10.doc
Page 6 of 8
, .:�..n.-�:. ' , .
K. TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY: (Section 4-2Q2.A.43 and 4-80't.G}
__ . _ _ _ __
� Include if required by the Traffic Operations Manager or his/her designee or if the proposed development:
• Will degrade the acceptable level of service for any roadway as adopted in the Comprehensive Pfan.
• Will genera[e 100 or more new vehicle directional trips per hour and/or 1000 or more,new vehicle trips per day.
• UVill affect a nearby roadway segment and/or intersection with five(5)reportable accidents within theprior tweive(12)month period or -
that is on the City's annual list of most hazardous intersections.
Trip generation shall be based on the most recent edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineer's(ITE)Trip General Manual.
_ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ___ _ _..
The Traffic.lmpact Study must 6e prepared in accordance with a "$coping Meeting" held with the Traffc Operations Manager and_the
Planning DepartmenYs Deveiopment Review Manager or their designee(727-562-4750)
Refer to Section 4-801 C of the Community Development Code for exceptions to this requirement.
� Acknowledgement of traffic impact study requirements(Appiicant must initial one of the following):
Traffic Impact Study is included.The study must include a summary table of pre-and-post-deveiopment levels of service for all
roadway legs and each turning movement at all intersections identified in the Scoping Meeting.
7raffc Impact Study is not required.
AUTION — IF APPLICATION REVIEIN RESULTS 'FN THE REQUIRE'MENT FOR A TRAFFIC
JMPACT STUQY.AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MLlS'f BE RESUBMfTTED
AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR.
If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 562-
475D.
L. FIRE FLOW CALCULATIONS/WATER STUDY:
Provide Fire Flow Calculations.Water Study by a FIRE PROTECTION ENGINEER to assure an adequate water supply is,available and to determine if.
any�upgrades are required by the deueloper due to the impaci of this project. The water suppiy must be able to s4Pport the needs of any required f re ,
sprinkler,standpipe and/or.fire pump. If a fire pump is required the water suPpfy must be able to sUpply 150°io of its rated capacity. Compiiance with -
�„ �„ . �.:-
l'ft2�uv4�iDFI(]c�Ii'�rfBVE�iiuii CGuc iu iiiCitiuc ivFrn i3,ivi��r.i•"t, iv��r,��,ivr=i=n�$i,ai�u iv�r=rn i i=r��i=�TliBx i'�l IJ ICI.fUIlEt1.
� Acknowledgement of fire flow calcutations/water study requirements(Applicant must initial one of the folfowing):
Fire Flow Calculatiors/Water Study is included.
Fire Flow Caiculations/Water Study is not required.
AUTION — :IF APPLICATION REVIEIN RESULTS iN THE REQUIREMENT FOR ;A ;F.IRE �.FLOW
CALGULATIONS/1NATER STt1DY AND'N�NE H;4S`BEEN 'SUgMITTED, :APP.LI.CATION"MUST 'BE
--- RESUBMITTED-AND SIGNIF�CANT DELAY-1ttIAY O'GCUR.
If you have questions regarding these requirements,conta¢t the City Fire Prevention Department at(727)562-4334.
M. SIGNATURE:
I,#he undersigned,acknowiedge that all representations made STATE OF FLORIDA,COUNTY C1F PINFLL�
in this applicafion aretrue and accurate to the best ofimy Sworn to and su ri6etl before me'this `� day of
know.ledge and authorize City representatives to visit and ,A:D.2D 4/ to me=and/orby
photo ra h the rope descnbe i ��, 6c tion,, . , who is ersonall known ha$
9 P P �Y �UnfR:�x t���wfu-..:n1�OF�lAP.ITJh' p y
_ _::__ _ __ , �.� .�,.,, tFTa _ _
_ �riar:..P,.�Asa1� � __.
'��=�ommission��D824$59 �"°c"""`�°�""n.
�:,,�,�.,�,,.,=�x�ires: OCT.D4,2u12
— �orins��z�r:zLn:.TT�cs�tn�cn.,�c.
Signa ure of pro erty owner or representative Notary pub ,., ,
����.��` �,�,��'����,�,��� My commission expires:
��3R.� ����E?�''�'��C)�-�'
.��*��n1.3 �i$�Va'4infia���¢�N�a`�op���av�op�l-Revi�.4J�.�b�Forms updated with new Deparlment namelResidenlial Infill Project(FLD)�520'1D.doc
Page 7 of S
____
� r, '
�
t�. AFFIaAVITTO AUTHORIZE AGENT:
_ __
_ . _ _
�. Provide names of all property owners on deed—PRINT tull names:
_.___��.}���"�— ._��__—��„�L-��1:��- - ' _ �---- -
__ �"�-.���r�. c�,��t z.�'�if'� -�"�
- _ _ � - -. _ _
( } 9 P P rtY� 9 ) -
2. That(I am/we are)ihe owner(s)and recortl title tiolde�s of the followin descnbed �o e adcJress or enera ocation :
____�� t V ��f�f-lL�.��'i�� ��/��__.._.l t-�� t � _-__.�
T �
3. That this property constitutes the property for which a request for a:(describe request)
..� �'�L , ..-
4. That the undersigned(has/have)appointed and(does/do)appoint
����7� �_��%�-��(;(/1�
as(his/their)agent(s)to execute any petitions or other documents neeessary to affect such petition;
5. That this affdavit has been executed to induee the City of Clearwater, Florida to consider and act on the above described property;
6. That site visits to the property are necessary by City representatives in order to process this application and the owner authorizes City
representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application;
7. That(Uwe),the under � ned authority, hereby certify that the foregoing is true and correct.
---__.....:_..._.............__ ._.4—_ —. _...._.__.__..._...--�----------__......___.._.....__._...._....._.._..._......_.._................._..---....._......_..
pe Owner Property Owner
�.1'��`�!�''. ��.,�� �'�''.���`����
—��'��p�jr_p�������� Property Owner
���5�������������'�5��.�� FLORIDA,
— --:_ _ _ ------ ----- ----COU'NTY'OF�PINELLAS. ------------ -- ---__ - --- --- --
�
Before ms the.undersigned,an officer duly commissioned by the laws of the State:of Florida,on this �/ day of
J�� , � 1 1 personally,appeared G�,'E�S�fo�������� who having been first duly swom
�,.�,�i-rc��-Y.�--
Deposes and says that helshe#ully understands fhe contents ofthe a�davit that heishe signed.
_ . . . ------ ---- _
----___.. ____.. .__ ___
- — ..—.__.. - — ------ . _-
_ _--- hC31�,R�'PtJ�,:ue•�%�T.EOFFLf)RID�i
,,,-s Brian 14. Asay
��=Commission#DD824869
`Ex�ir?s; �OCT.04,201�
Nota.ry Public Signature
�UTIAEU THRL�AT',.ANTJC BONDING CO.,INC,
Notary SeaUStamp My Commission Expires:
S:1Planning DeparlmentlApplication Forzns\Development Review12010 Forms updated with new Department�namelResidentiai Infill Prqect(FLD)5.201D.doc �
Page S of S
e
D. V«2IT�'EN SUBNIITTAL REQUIREMLNTS: (Code Section 3-913.A) (RESI�ENTIAL}
1. The proposed development of the land will be in hannony with the scale,bu1�:, coverage,
density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located.
The existing guard booth-on the prope��t��-has existed for 1 S years and this proposal
is simply to move it fonvard to the gates such that identification of entering vehicles
is fasteY. The scale, bulk, coverage and density is the same, and is the minimum
necessaiy for the function. The chat-acteY is in harmony with the public ball fields
which is the only function adjacent to the main entrance and the entire west side of
the property.
2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and
use of adjacent land and buildings or si�iricantly impair fne value thereof.
The proposed develo�ment will have no effect on the development and use of
adjacent properties, except possibly to encourage use by providing improved
security and traffic flow at this section of the street and the opposite public parking
Zot.
3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons residing
or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use.
The proposed development will provide increased security at this section of the st�•eet
by having the manned guard booth closer to the street and sidewalks.
4. The proposed development is designed to riinimize traffic congestion.
The primary pu�Pose of the proposed development is to reduce any standing time of
vehicles entering the property, by providing direct visual and voice contact, which
will minimize any tra�c congestion.
�. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate
��icinity of the parcel proposed for development.
The proposed development is consistent with the community character as the gates
and hedge have existed for man��years, and the guard booth is a normal and
consistent structure at this 10 acre, 200 apartment complex
6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, incluc3ing visual,
acoustic and olfactory and haurs of operation impacts, on adjacent properties.
The pro�osed development will have no acoustic, olfactor�� or hours of operation
impacts on adjacent properties. It will improve the visual impact by providing a
stucco and clay tile roof guard booth which is integrated with the existing buildings
of Spanish detailed Haeienda Ga��dens apariments.
a
VGTRITTEl\T SLTBMITTAL REQUII2EMEN'I'S: (Residential Infill Project Criteria).
1. The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development is otherwise
impractical without deviations from the intensity and development standards.
No deviation from the intensity standards is r-equested.
The intended purpose of close visual and verbal contact with ente��ing drivers, to
expedite traffic flow off the street, is not possible without reduction of the setbac�:
standard for the guard booth st��ucture.
2. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a residential infill proj ect will
not materially reduce the fair market value of abutting properties. (Include the e�isting value
of the site and the proposed value of the site with the improvements.}
The only request in this development proposal is for reduction of setback
requirement so the gate guard booth can be moved up to the p��operty line. This will
have no effect on.the fair market value of the abutting properties, ezcept to possibly
increase the value due to a) a proper "gated community"look, and b) improved
tr�affic flow on the street, and c) improved security due to a manned gate booth.
3. The uses within the residentia.l infill proj ect are otherwise permitted in the City of
Clearwater.
The existing uses of inedium-density residential and accessory uses are permitted in
the City and on this property, and these are not proposed to change.
4. The uses or mix of use within the residential infill project are compatible with adjacent land
uses.
The uses on this property have existed for over 40 years, ar•e compaiible with the
adjacent Zand uses of inedium-density residential to the east,public/semi public to
the north and west, and residential(no street access from Ai�Port Rd) to the south.
The existing uses a�•e not proposed to change.
5. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a residential infill project u�ill
upgrade the unmediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development.
The proposed development will upo ade the immediate vicinity by a) expediting
traffic off the street, and b) improving security by p�roviding a manned booth
adjacent to the st�-eet and obser-ving the public pai°kzng lot directly across the street.
6. The design of the proposed residential infill project creates a form and function that
enhances the community character of the immediate vicuuty of the parcel proposed for
development and the-City of Clearwater as a whole.
The proposed development enhances community character by adding a manned
booth at the property entrance where citizens can ask directions or seek assistance
when necessaly.
d
7. Fle�bility with regard to Iot width,required setbacks,height and off-street parl:ing are
justified by the benefits to community character and the immediate vicinity of the parcel
proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole.
The onl��flexibility reguested is the required setbackfor the 6foot wide guard booth
at the-main-entrance gates. Lot�width, setbacks in all-other areas, height and off-
street parking are not necessary or requested to change.
. ' .—s.� �'� - . • . � � ~ ' �. . . ' � .
T.: " _ . " • . � . . . ` O.R.���PAGE�?! . '
?�, � ,
11_�9` _ ,,- . -�-8�1 L�7.t7,��r7 : ` ,�iia.u:., '�,u�':xl•
�-
Rec �• : _ . .,', .
` �1".D,. ; '' � � _— - . _ _ 'PrvFx°is'r: ._•..,+, in7 �,
.�.Int. � - . .� • .d::.�� . .
�.
_ - . _.
'-�.;�'��ttS' },ro,•1;�� ' x;8"�SCIAI, WRRRANTx. D�3D O.. �llL:�� � t� ��I �Gb
TSIS'��BC� wARB�lNT� D88D,3das3'� �ia� Z� da of-�u7.y. ' _ `_
� , -.,--
;�986.,`�b+j and bet�ecn �DA9� HG ��lSSOCT.�TSS,• LTD„ -a Flocida Lim _
itad'; •'Far.tnershi�;, (heraiaaftrr. calle3 th�e-'GRA�IR`OR�) .and
C9�iRG8. .OP �CZB2ITQLOGX i!7�G S��ICB=;DRG i:;I�IC ;�a� Flo�rida Cor �
po�e���c�c� �l�ose addreas, is Z7,0 Sautb 49rt Har.r�aon., :•Cle�r,�a ,
E�r, Elorid�t 335'15.:(3rere�,na�ftar called the "GR•�S3').: ,: - ;'�,-�„ ;•
7�en,+R+f,eY naed.� hecai°n� ,-the .t��me '9�Pi'QR`.; and 'GRANTSB' r Sr��
� inc3 e. � 1;��e� gartiea:..3a this, instrume�t�-�'nd the tiei.rs, Se . � •
� � � � . 1 '. `k�p�
' S ; g�t1 re�i�e�ta�.artives..ana�� aasiqiis-,•of iad3.viduals,�and the auc- �` -� ���,�
cassoX� aad ffs�iz�tis. o.£ carpci�atioas: - . � �-
, �'o ��
-�_ ;,_' W�T:9BSSBTH: ,. . .. � ' - ' . �,}.�� `.�'�
1 + —T u bY �,� � �K`;.
'.:_ ( , .� . , . :' � .. _ ,. � .. . . '�_ � ' .
« il ' . .. ' . . . . � ' � ' � . . .. . �c � Si9.�+;�
�� r - t 'i'hat G�T;3R� f�r;>�ind ia .cvnsideration of.t�1e "sum o� .Ten - ���Y����
����
F ' � � a�}d bio;(100:: �o3iara :,(.�1-0 0�} :and other: valnable. conaidera. _ r ;�` ' ��;U�
F "_ t3.oas, :racz:i�t yheteof is hereby• ac.knoaledged, .by��hese pres , :,
� ,�;�
w ent�: does;;erant„�hargain, ..selly. ali,en, �semise.�:,'release, con _ t�-
I ;"' Y�
�48�r 'C=a31Sf8X and'�conf�,r-m .unto: GItANT88 all. that certain land� • �.,�, 4� ,
>a��n�sta� ii�;Fi�ell�as Caunty; Florida, to wit: . ' . ' �:;:� �" `�
� ��w�
. . , � .i�_ } �
_ • —r"_' ��T- Re�_�ROPSRS�`�-desri.ibed�: on SXSIBT.^_` 'A" . at- - . - - r�' '�
� � �d�..
� � ,.tac,3�ed hereto and._ incncparatad h�z'eYn by this •ref- . �
�.. ese�s;ca� and �eraonal ..prnper.ty thereon' (hereinaftes - 1�-��''�
__ . r�fers�ed ta as fhe 'P�tD�P$RT°').�wYiich_�s :SUhject i� ,,,�,,: k;;�
' ,, SX3IBIT� 'B' •attached hereta and°.incorporated-hersin" ' >>�
. ; il-'
-- - --- -�iy r-+ef�reac�•- - .� - • _ . " • - • ���-�
-- • - �- _ ._ . u�.� ,�z"``�
'.3"flG�T9SR WITS all taflements,,heredi�aments and all, "
4.f�
� �.
:_ . a��artenaacsa theseto bel�stnqinq• or in •anY�ise ap= - • x ` �-�
_ - • . pur�ai-n3:ng. .. , , �: �r �...-�:_
. • ^ . ,... _. , . ��, .�,;.... =,;�
- � . � Tfl. HA'VS AND. TO HOI,B the same-. in �ee_:simple :,f.ocev-. �; ; ,;; r,�
_- . � -_ , . o er. - - • . , e _ . - . that at , , ,v - 7� �' . � �'
' " �' 1►�ii�:6&ABi�R does heretry cavenant with GRANTSB = F-._ =
� .� t}te. �i�e... pf de3:iver� of'' this -SPSCiAL WAR'�ANTY DSBD, the , : f� ;
�•- .
at�ave=deac'ribed�zeal;�"property �+as .f e.`��ZOm,all, encumbrnncea • {< ! :
• �iade,_by�>�"CR, esc�plt �thqse, matt�e�r9 described on $XHIBIT #., � : -
- '.:'B• ' attac3ied ,_heceta:`. atnd incorporated. heseYn by. this refer- f ;
erice;: and�- tha�` 6RANTbR will warraat and .defand the same ` " `
� ' . � aga�nat, t,he l:aaful.ciaime and demanda of al. geraons claiming. �., �;_ `:
_ by, thrvugh, or under .sa' _.GB&DiTflR, but-'agains� none othar. •_,
- � - �----
, ZN�,WI2NSSS• WHSR�OF, G$ANTORS have caused these.�yresents. �€'; %r^,��,=
tc_.be `�aecutad .in theiz nane, tkia dag and jeas,fi�rat ahove • � ,. .,';'.�+---
�� .� rrittxn. _ ,. �,. u . • �` ;
'" �' �(�
� :,.sicx�o. �s�aa ana Dsi�vsztsD ° . . : - � �� �--�-=; -
� ��`
�.in � e:• resenc�. of z - _
a., . 1 GRA�iITOR: ' . _ �a.' �.;�
�" -- " ° " — DRW. HG^ASSOCIATB3, LTB. , �- "�
F„ _ � �
Hy: Gene;al� Partner �."`'�
g
, . • O "• � . . ' . ��/�.f-I Q .. . .'�. ' — -
� �. . . 1�J � • • �
>c�G�-�C.. �, 'Q ..,.,:
- .. - . . � - PAtH, F.r?l��ILBY, ', ce-ciires � " -
• ' � P,31. PROPSRTISS. .IP1C. � .:ti
.�� _ ,.. ,. , ,
. - .,,
-_ -<
' , . � _ • �. . . . � , ' ' . . • ' T ''a'..:.�+T^j,
����� � . �'�5810732 4D 1. 2�.1L8d ° , ;
_ . �aeumen+ary Tai, �aei7...� • - �0 21.00 r_':
; �' •-r••••••:.:••••... •Intsnglble.7u Pd, .
fl ' ,�3s�35.04. � ��,'
"� - � F e o�aker. Cierk � , : TOTAL . 2�rQ36.4U C:iK , ,"a'�`
Pinell�s.Counly�� � � T.
�� ' ...c: . . DeP�h CterY t . . � � . , � . , �. - . Kj.r ,:. t
�-,ii. - . , . . . • . . - . - �" '•�"�.'�'
' ' : . ' RETURH T�hie Ihafrumsm wes AroPa�ad�y � � ►^-'"'
— . t•, .
• ,' :20HN'E.CICF.FID.ll,AttameY-�t-law � � � y"�" _��
—•---•--... _ Elphth�Floor. _ . '�i�
i - — - . — — — • - Tsmpa-Ti�eaue 8ulldh�p ' '.
�. :
" . , 70T Frsnkllo Streei Matl ��
, .� , .
. . . ; . ' Tem W.Florlda 9°S02. — ,ti=;._ '.
. ,. _ . . .'' . , � � ' .. � . � .J,� • ' � , �.-
. � .._.. ' ,..�._ . ... __s.a. � .. ..._. . . i
�,,.—..,: ,..... ,:,r-:..._.:y.�^_"' ,.s..._,.._,... -a . ' `c . . --- . _ .
.< . _ �.x� �-y:�
�'. . .-.. . ' . . .. - - - ' . ; _ . .. . � +' � ¢ ti _ - _ _
�roper�y Appra�ser Cienerallntorrnation ra�c 1 vl �
Interactive�Ian of this narcel Sales Quzrv Back to Que.ti�Results Ne�N Search Tax Coilector Horne Pa�e Question/Couunent about this pase
I
��.-29-�.5-fl���4�-41�-0��0�
Portabilit�r Data Cur?'ent as of Ju1v 28 �Ol 1 Im�rovement Value
Calculator [1:04 pm Sunday 7uly �l] pru�t Radius Search perF.S. 5�3.844
Ownership/1Ylailin6�ddress I, Site Address (First Buildina) � �� ��:
CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY FLt�G SVC i ��1 N SATURN AVE CLE�IRWATER�375�- � S ,,� �
ORG?NC � '" � �'
503 CLEVELAi�TD ST Jum to buildin� u �;��
......_ � '� "� :i ��� .�.
CLEARWATER FL �375J-�007 (1) 5�1 N SATURN AVE CLEARWATER 33755- -F �
Property T1se: 0310 (Apar�ments (50 units or more)) Living Units: 0
[click here to hide] 2fl11 Legal Description
FROM SE COR OF N�E 1/4 OF SE 1/4 TH N 60FT TH N89DW 85.9�FT FOR POB TH N89DW 521.08FT TH
NOlDW 856.28FT TH E 520FT TH SO1DE 726.76 FT TH S89DE 12.74FT TH SOlDE 68.86FT TH CL�RT RAD
2750FT ARC 55.9FT CB S 55.39FT TH S46DW 14.15FT TO POB CONT 10.29AC(C)
ZOl1 EYem�tions `'� File for Homestead Exemption
Homestead: No Save-Our-Homes Cap Percentage: 0.00°% Non-Homestead 10% Cap: Yes
Government:No Institutional: Yes Agricultural: �0 Historic: $0
Zfl11 Parcel Information ZD10 OriQinal Trim Notice
lylost Recent Convevanc� Sales Com��arison Census Tract Evacuation Zo e Plat BooWPage
06279/2067 � � Sales Quei-v � 1210�026602 NON EVAC � �
20ll Pr�liminarv Va1ue Information
Year Save-Our- Just/Nlarl{et �ssessed Value/ Countv TaYable School TaYable Nlunici�al TaYable
Homes cap Value SOH Cap Value Vahie Vahie
2011 No �9,6�14,947 �9,544,947 �96,�49 $96,449 �96,449
[click here to hide] Value History as Certified {yellow indicates correction on file)
Year Save-Our- Just/Marlcet :Assessed Vahie/ Countv Taxable School Taxable Nlunic�al TaYable
Hoines Cav Value SOH Cap Value Value Value
2010 No �9,593,202 �9,�93,202 $95,932 �95,932 �95,932
2009 No $10,942,342 �10,942,342 $109,�23 $109,4�3 $109,423
200�g No $ll,565,900 $11,565,900 �115,659 $115,659 �115,659
2007 No $11,568,600 $11,568,600 �2,822,7�8 N/A �2,822,733
2006 No �10,959,600 $10,959;600 $2,674,142 N/A $2,674,142
2005 No $10,219,200 $10,219,200 �2,493,500 N/A $2,493,500
2004 No $9,469,900 $9,469,900 $2,310,700 N/A $2,310,700
2003 No $7,525,000 $7,525,000 $1,836,100 N/A $1,836,100
2002 No �7,526,800 �7,526,800 �1,8�6,540 N/A $1;836,540
2001 No $6,963,400 $6,96�,400 $1,699,070 N/A $1,699,070
2000 No $0,680,400 $6,680,�00 $1;630,020 N/A �1,6�0,020
1999 No �6,2i7,100 $6,277,100 $1,531,610 N/A $1,531,610
1998 No $5,619,500 $5,619;500 $1,371,160 N/A $1,�71,160
1997 No $4,848,800 $4,848,800 $1,183,110 N/A $1,183,110
1996 No $4,�48,500 $4,8�8,800 $1,115,220 N/A $1,115,220
http://www.pcpao.or�/aeneral.php?strap=152911000004100�00 7/31/2011
, �
Stormwater
This proposal includes only the request to move the existing gate guard booth
(rebuild) from approximately 50 ft back from the gates, to a position between the
entrance and exit gates, such that incoming vehicle drivers can be identified and directed
to the correct building, when necessary(service personnel, visitors, etc) and also answer
any questions from exiting vehicle drivers, all for the purpose of expediting the traffic
flow on and off the property resulting in the least amount of queing on the roadside.
The attached photograph shows the existing conditions of gates, guard booth,
driveway and landscape areas, and the central stormwater drain grate in the center of the
area. The amount of impervious surface area does not change as the area proposed to
locate it is akeady impervious surface. The new guard booth is not located over the
existing storm drain, or even close to it.
There are no proposed changes in any e�sting grades, so it is assumed that a grading
plan will not be required. All existing grades slope to the existing drain grate and drain
properly in this area.
�n�� ..
� �
�
� �
�a�e�f�' .�.y..:. s JT
�c
Y.: ��. :
,, � -:���.
I,�r� , �r ;�: . $��
4 t.` ,�°
��� . ���� � � ��
� ..,, � . � ��
� ` �,�� ' �
�'����� �i�\ \�i�
.):��, fF��,`� ����ar�`t�k1��4
�:44��' ' � ���� � � . � '
�, ..
� �
S� �� �"'t ," .� k�� +' � ��,�`�?� ���'i� .'
��� �', . *� �ii�
� ,
�
,
x 6 r �
«e. .
� .
.� : �i
,: 4 + '. ' aj
� +��*., .,�- �
��` ,�:� ` � � ,�. �" ��
, �,. ` ,,* ���' ..- ", �„ �.
�k >:;.,. • R I Y■{ ■■■ ak z`� �� ^�-� ���� �s � r �,
. .. - ' *�t � ����� ��� A•�'� .i a,R �te4i#.Y',.�CY. •Y C��C/�[�� l���k{ � i�I �YY � i '�P 3,
- � �r �' '�`. � ���' '��# .,�� � � ��4�j��� ������ ��� '�` � -
. _� �� � � ���� �i�� � ����� II ����,���„�14�. _�il��l���!��l�� �° � <�. � � ��_ T�. - ��� ;
.���s � ,� � ������ , �����������l� i11 I� ��� �, �.� _�� $.�� �
- X � � :�������� � �� ���. �; � �� ����� .� * � � � ��
.- �
- � � ��._� � :�w������ 1` ' ' �� ��Ilill[I���I�I� ll �II����► � , # �.
,. . . .� . .
.� .. .. . � .
� � �IIIIII1�_ �I���
�11111i � � ��
_ _ � ._�.
, ��� .
: �. , � � ���,�������� ,�������� _______ �
..;.. - � ��� � «u �� ���._ --�--
- ..........�- _
� �
�r �.wh �,s���,�;��¢��.,
�,�, <�� �" ,,;�,�r, Iltu ,� .,-�., = e
� �
,:' , ,„�,,.
,. - �
.��t,. � � � � � � �� �
�.' ''�
�.
� ' A Proposed G uard Booth for the Owner:
� � � iend �
� � � � � 13 � Service Organization
551 N. Saturn Ave., Clearwater, Florida 319 South Garden Avenue
Clear�rater, FL 33756-5423
August 31, 2011 tel 727-467-6588
In/Out Gate Emergency
for Buses Only Exit Only
Keene Road
0
�
z
a
� m
BUILDING G BUILDING H BUILDING N S h e e t I�d e x
� BUILDING I
� BUILDING M 1 Site Plan, Showing
z � All existing buildings
A and site access points
a w
� z 2 Existing Plan at Main
v Gate
a �
� ..,
a ra 3 Proposed Plan at Main
� .� Entrance, showing
�' addition of new
0
— - — Q• Guard Booth
�.
...
Q 4 Elevations of Proposed
Guard Booth
Q BUILDING J BUILDING L 5 Partial Site Plan
z showing vehicle access
� A BUILDING C BUILDING B BUILDING A Bo�Pth posed Guard
�
a
m
Saturn Avenue �
Emergency I ' �Area of Wo�k �
Exit Only Main gate �
�
S�te Key P�a� �,
N �o
c�
a
0 25 100 250
Scale in Feet
� � A Proposed Guard Booth for the Owner:
� � � � � � � �
� � 1 � � � � Servi�p Organization
551 N. Saturn Ave., ClearwaLer, Florida 319 South Garden Avenue
Clearwater, EL 33756-5423
August 31, 2011 tel 727-467-6588
Vehicle Exit
� O O
Already—Permitted
Concrete Sidewalk Existing Gate Motor �:��
Existing Gate Motor y . y � y �
Existing Fence y � ya� yy� yy
O O Already—Permitted ` �,'�' .�`�' .�'�'
Existing Column Sliding Entry Gates Existing Fence �, ' ,�,, ` �
. y y y ` y y ya�
Existing Column . y�J�� y�J� y y��L �
yLW+ +y+Wl yy�W � 1yy�
,�, + �� , + �� „
a J. � y J. � y y � � W. ay.� ,. +y.�� ay�
„I ,, y ,I ,, y ,f „ y ,,f .. , ,.
W V/ V/ V/ : Already—Permitted � Vehicie Entrance a y+�y y`� a ya�a
a y W a y W y W a y Metal Fence ��j,� a ,�, Y ,,�,, y .
� y y..
� + y W y y W ` y
. .
ay.J/� + J/ . ay,.�/�
i �_�_� ` �.�•.
' — -- -- -- -- --- -- �.,.�• .::�'.
. J. � J. '�. -- -- -- -- — � :�. .� . ._y . ,— -- -- -- -- . -- -- -- -- -- -- -- .�� . .�j.
J. . y J.a y J.a
� y � y � y � Property Line Existing Groun � +y�J� � ay�� -
` y �l, ` y �l, ` y �l, ` Cover y�+ � y�y a�a^.�..
Existing Ground
Cover
Existing Sidewalk
Existing
Sidewalk
� y � y �
y � y � y Existing Ground
� y '�I� ' y Cover
` y � ' y '� Street Right—of—way
W ` y �1/ � . . ,^
Ll.l
, y ,I �
�i/
�, . Edge of Pavement �
� O
. �
G�
�— SATURN ROAD �
C�
�x�s�i� �'1��� ��a� �� S�t� E�try �a�es p-"
�
� 0 1 5 10
V � �
Scale in Feet
� � A Proposed G uard Booth for the Owner:
� �. �cie � c� �.
7�-2�� � a �° � � � �
Servica Organization
551 N. Saturn Ave., Clearwater, Florida 319 South Garden Avenue
August 31, 2�11 `Q;arwater, 7273467—fi588
Vehicle Exit
Already–Permitted
.,'� �:-: - O O
Concrete Sidewalk Existing Gate Motor ;:��i�
Proposed Guard Booth
Existing Gate Motor y � y � y .
Existing Fence y J' y � y �` y
O O Already–Permitted Proposed �. � y�� - y�� � y�� �
Existing Column Sliding Entry Gates � Existing Fence ,� ,� �
G�a�d �r y � y y y � yi`
BOO�li Existing Column � y��� y-J� � y-� �
_ y I y yy I y yy I a yy`
�Y V/ W
� � � � ,�/ , ` .�. y ,,� .
a �l. � a J. � y J. � . I . I ,.
� `. y V/ L y � ` � �: Site Triangle Remains - = �`a y+�` ` y+�`y y+\
` �" Clear (not affected by �� y`�'y y`�'' y`�' a
+ y � a y � y �' Proposed Guard Booth) Vehic�e Entrance � ,, �
,I ,I `� � Proposed Planter o � y+� a y� a yy
W 1 y W ' y V//` y � 1y�\�k + �� ay� I �
�i . •. _ V/
. :�. ''��..
y �—•.�T�/� — y -- --� —�— �-- -- -- -- — � -- —� —� �— -- -- --� --� —�— — -- -- -- -- ��� — y�� .
. . — --�-- -- � y ly ay�.
� j y ��y � y � � Property Line�� Existing Groun � Ly�� ay���
` y '�l� `�y � ` y '�l� ` Site Triangle Remains Cover a�a � � ° �
_ . . . . . . .y. . . . , .a. . . : Existing Ground Clear (not affected by . .
` •�'` • -` � �` �� `��� `��� �� Cover Proposed Guard Booth)
_ _ _ .::.;_.� :..
,1::':�:�:'�:�;:::��::::�:':;�:::��::'�: �:�°� :�:�'�
Existing Sidewalk
Existing
� Sidewalk
i
� y � y � �
y �' �' � y Existing Ground ~
� ` � 1 y Cover
y y �`l; ` y � Strest Right–of–Way
� L y � L�.J
' � `
�, � y Edge of Pavement �
� O
� �
�
-�— SATURN R�AD �,p
CC�
�'�o�� �'��� at Si�,e ���� Ga�es, S���in ��o �sed ����� Boot� �'
3' g �
1�t o � 5 io
� � �
i
Scale in Feet
� � A Proposed Guard Booth for the Owner:
� �. � � e1� c� �.
� � � i►+L � � � Service Organization
� 551 N. Saturn �ve., Clearwater, Florida 319 South Garden Avenue
August 31, 2011 �eiarwater, 727 3 67—fi588
a o
�
0 o Proposed
Guard
� Booth = °
. .�
� . -------------------------------- ---------- ----- -- - --------------- — — -- — - - — - -- -
0 �
0'
� � �
�
�
21'-0" 39'-6"
-�-- SATURN ROAD
�'a��ia� S��e �'�a� a� E�t�y Ga�e
N �
�
0
�
c.�
�
cd
�
0 5 10 20
Scale in Feet
' � ��--� � : .� � �
i / i ����
v
. . — , . . ,
. , , :
. . . —, _
�
,
� w �:
. _
.
., :..,a .: . __ .
.
..r�..i.�..._..... ... , . - ..�.�.r�r.�r�.
I.��[AlAIAfAI�t►���► 4►� 1�►�!. ��AI�IAt IA{AIA�I�r�'!
.►!r�11AlAi� �EA�AI�IN�� r►!`�IA�IA;l1�'►.'►,.� ��I" A A���A �A N ..�►
►�lM�1�1������1���������i ►�1�1�t��1�i1�i�l�t�l�i�i�i . . . . � � � • ' ����I�IA1��1��1��������11� .
♦f lAI�IA! EA �t i ♦ ♦��*1 1 � � IA1 i�-,�►. .
_ A ..�;>� �.,_,
. �
...
��
_; _..�.�� .�. :,.����: . �.,..;�; ,� , ,. ..a. :�� . .� �...._, _.r�;���� ;.�_��,�.�������
� „ �
�;
�
�
�
■�■�������■��• ���� ���� �������������■ ` '; ;'
� �� �
. ;
�.,.�,: �; � � �� , .�w
��
�
�. � ��
� �s` ��
i�■�S�■■��■■�� ■� i� ����■■���■���■
V
•
/ • / I • . • � •
i : !
��,,�
���'~`!' � : 1 1 !
� 1 ^ �
.!!~t�'A�r��i�iAi'►iA�i��, � , � , � -
� : .
� .,_. .
�
„ �
�:* -
jY� �.
_ _
■���� �■i��■��■■����■�����■■�����■■■���■���■��■■���■■�� ���i i�■� ����������■�����i������■�■���������■�■�t/i�l����i 1�■�■
(
�,.
� �� �� •
� ��' � �R�!l�i���l����i��������i����■��l�■�����l������■■� ■.■� I �... ���i���/������■��■��/�■��f■���f�������������#��#� �� �`� � � .
■t�il ,.. . � �� , a .�,..:.n.�..�, ���■
�� -
. . . . , .
.
. . — i
.
. � � . ■
. • .
� �
.
A Propoaed Guard Booth for the Owher:
Hacienda
Ga r d e n s Service Organization
551 N.Saturn Ave.,Clearwater,Florida 31B South Gerden Avehue
Au ll9i 31�2011 �7earwater,FL 33758-5423
g tel 727-467-8588
In/Out Gate Emergency
for Buaes Only Eait Only
Keene Road
0
cs
z
� a
� � �
BUILD[NG G �BUIL�H� � BUILDING N Sheet Index
w HUILDING I
BUILDING M 1 Site Plan,Showing
� � � ❑ All ezisting buildinga
Q � and site acceas points
d p°
� z 2 Eziating Plan at Main
Q D Gate
.a •
� q 3 Proposed Plan at Main
� � Entrance, showing
o addition of new
—-— a Guard Booth
d 4 Elevationa of Propoaed
Guard Booth
Q BUILDING J HUILDING L 5 Partial Site Plan
'� ahowing vehicle accesa
�
a BUILDING C HUILDING H HUILDING A Hooth pOaed Guard
w �
Saturn Avenue �
Emergency '�Area of Work o
Ezit Only Main gate
.-i
Site Key Plan �,
N av
c�
a
0 25 100 250
u � �
Scale in Feet
.
A Propoeed Guard Booth for the owner:
Hacienda
Ga r d e n s Service Organization
551 N.Saturn Ave.,Clearwater,Florida 319 South Garden Aveaue
Au ust 31,2011 ��rnater,FL 337563423
B tel 727-487-8588
Vehicle Ezit
Already—Permitted O O
Concrete Sidewalk Szieting Gate Motor ,�;:
Eaiating Gate Motor y , Ii , Iy .
Esiating Fence y�y� +�W y W '� \
O O Already—Permitted � y�`�'� y•�'• y��'�
Eziating Column Sliding&ntry Gates Eziating Fence y,�,, 'y �,, 'y.�,. 'y.�
Saiating Column y..l.. y.J•. �y..l•.
y.�. y.�. y.�y. y..
+W. .�y. .�y.
,1y y.�. y.�y. y..
� 'y� �y W 'y� . . .
� , � � , ` Already—Permitted Vehicle Entrance ` y'�" y'�" y'�"
� y Metal Fence
'I� .I� ,1 .�, y,�. .�. y..
W 'y W �y W �y . . .
'W�`-=�=-zI -'�' -- ------------------------------ � J. -�-J�
•1 .1 . •'� ----------------------- ----- =----=----- .
�. � .
W y W y W y W . y. y� y,.
� y� y� Property Line Eaiating Groun . y..�• y�J��
. . COV@1' '; .� .�. .�.
Ezisting Ground
Cover
Eziating Sidewalk
Eziating
Sidewalk
. 1 . 1 .
'`�' '��' '� Eziating Ground
�: � . �y Cover
.y� .y�
� y� Street Right—of—Nay
y,I 4✓
W �
�, � Edge of Pavement �
• O
C�2
�
E SATURN ROAD - (�
C�
Existing Floor Plan at Site Entry Gates p"
N o i e io
� � �
� Scale in Feet
A Propoaed Guard Booth for the owner:
Hacienda
� 7�-z�� Gardens
Service Organization
551 N.Saturn Ave.,Clearwater,Florida 919 Soulh Gerdea Avenue
Clesrneter,F�93758-5423
August 31,2011 Le� 727-467-6598
Vehicle Eait
Already-Permitted i�;i, O O
Concrete Sidewalk Eaiating Gate Motor
Proposed Guard Booth
Eziating Gate Motor Iy , �1y , 1y ,
Eziating Fence y W Iy W �Iy� W Iy `
O O Already-Permitted Proposed � � y+W+ y•W� y�W•
fizieting Column Sliding Entry Gates Guard � Ezisting Fence ,�„ ' ,�„ ' ,�„ '
:y 1 J 1 J••
BOO�1., Existing Column y.�� y.y• y�J��
11 I I
' y.�y, y.�y. y.�. y..
..�. ' .�,. ' .j,.
1 , �: , 1 • •
� �y� �y� �y�L,: Site Triangle Remains �.; � '` � �' � �'
Clear(not affected by Vehicle Entrance ' +'�" +`y' y'�"
� � J: �y�; �' Propoaed Guard Booth) ' '
J, . �, . �, .� Proposed Plante o . y`�• •�. y.•
1 . �L� J� �
�-�� 1 ������ __-__________.___-__-__ ___ _ �' _��__�.�_��_ ___ _____-__-__-_ ___"__'_ __ __ __
N y.� �. y.�.
� y��y� y� ,�, y, y.�i. y..
Property Line� Eziating Groun • y�. y.J��
� �' ��y�' �y�' � Site Triangle Remaina Cover .� � � �
Eziating Ground Clear(not affected by ��
l Cover Proposed Guard Booth)
\
Eziating Sidewalk ,
Eaisting
m Sidewalk
. 1 . i . �
�
`J' �'�' ' Esiating Ground ~
�: � , �y Cover
,y� .y�
� y� Street Right-of-Aay
y� Y�
�, � Edge of Pavement �
� O
C`7
�
-E SATURN ROAD- - �
C�
Floor Plan at Site Entry Gates, Showing Proposed Guard Booth
a
N o i s io
u -
Scale In Feet
A Propoaed Guard Haoth fer the owner:
Hacienda
Ga r d e n s ��i�or`a��tlan
551 N.Setnrn Ave.,Clearwater,Plorida 31a sovth ca�u aveaue
Clnrw�ter,F'L 93758-5429
Augnet 91�2�11 tel 727-487-05B8
"�Barrel Tllee to
Match Exieting
on Site
Stucco on Concrete
Hlock
Ezieting![etal Feace
�: I
F,��-. ���� . -� ..
l �� /// � m °� ,/ �//� /�
� / � : :, /� : �/ �.` /� :
I �❑ ❑
i � '
19'w 11'-4" _� 7'-2" ll'-4° I 19"
South Elevation East Elevation North Elevation
Barnl Tilee to
![atch Eziet(nQ
on Site
Stucca on Concrete
Hlock
�� ��
Szieting Yetal Fence k Gatee
� ���/�J
11�
I w
O
d�
, �
7,_2„ Planter �
West Elevation (Facing Street) a
0 ! 5 10
Seate in Peel
I
A Propoaed Guard Hooth for the owner:
Hacienda
Ga r d e n s Service Organizatian
551 N.Saturn Ave.,Cleareater,Florida 3t9 south carden A.enue
Clearwateq FL 33758-5423
Auguet 31,2011 c�i 727-487-B5B8
❑.
Pro
Po�
Guard
o�o Booth
.. .
�-- -------- ---------- _ ----`•
� ---- ----- -- - ,,_,
< < ----------—--- . ..� _^.
1
_ �
�
21'-0" 39'-6"
�--SATURN ROAD—�
Partial Site Plan at Entry Gate
N �n
�
0
�
a�
an
c�
a
0 5 10 20
�J �
Scale in Feet
� ,
Landsc�.pe
This proposal includes only the request to move the existing gate guard booth
(rebuild) from appro�imately 50 ft back from the gates, to a position between the
en�ance and e�it gates, such that incoming vehicle drivers can be identined and directed
to the correct building, when necessary(se�-vice personnel, visitors, etc) and also answer
any questions from exiting vehicle drivers, aIl for the purpose of e�pediting the traffic
flow on and offthe property resulting in the least amount of queing an the roadside.
The e�isting landscape consists of a hed�e and palm trees on the property Iine, and
b ass in the right-of-way, and is not proposed to be changed. Grass areas are shown on
the�lan view drawing submitted.
Please accept the attached photo�aph which shows what the e�isting conditions.
tr'�� �' "� ,�` �s2 �`4�qYm� t.
��.,
, . ! � � `� �Y�.
! - �
�} :
, �
Y
� r
�a c
�` '�,�,t�"`�FK��c :v
aAH �:� A �. .,k .}9k�q� .rr Y� �d. x '�c a ;, �t `'��-� v� ?..Sj„ . . .
t r �
,_: _ ... ',,, , , �: .,
`
� , �:'
,. . .. ,-: , a
�
,�
. :� . . . , : , ,�
� I_
: `4a t � isr . - . . .
��� $� "��f����1S.u.� :' � �Y \Y
5�p• Y „{�j A.Y k .
`Y {'
� v 1 ?'�`�L 3 rY � .
�� y
,}
� �
... �. ' . ,, . .
.. o �nr.r .... . , ,
,
�i:, ?�.
� .,..
4
>�r��rri��� �1 t ,���i{������������j����i f������� ��j! " .; E
(}� {�� .
"`lii���■���������������t������� a� ������!{!��l1I�{� �f INNq ����.ti� �� R � ,,�a , � �
. "���7"9'�<`�.� .. �#���.7 � �,�� •���,, ..�,,.11�i?Jiliil i1iF•�#i=" '^apt,' �� � ..,'.. � �""�x , �� ��� '�.
, ,:
.._ ' ��. . �.�_ - :�� . �����'K"a � . -.4. }'� _ : t .� � �„� - `r
_ ��
�
Sk+Y4'li ` . . � �� . . � .'+� t�a�. Sa . .
.. � �, � - ' _ �,, �>, ,�-y� � a�
,
. . ,.. �T �... . �` q '�t'"� c �C� t .t ' � �
. , _ r �� , ,�..�.; �
W �_. „ 'c' ,� . !,_
_ . �, y
- . ... . -. i �� �.�:, . �Y� . � �"�„'� V r �-_t. :i - �R �-�� ,� �
: '
.�. . . A m� .Y`� 4A�'�'
,i _ �
`�' �i��� �'
� .�,� �,,a
�. � 3 �i,x ��
.,� ��;�� �,. , , �. ��� �� ���
, � 1��- �R �
.
.��� � , (
� � ��
, �
.
-� � � � �. ._ u -- .�.
, . ,�.�, �
� �,�� �� � �.�., - � , , .� �
_ , ,
. ,
��;.... �, ,
. , ,� :
� �,'°'.
_. ti �
. ,. �; r r �. .�
�4• f Y y� T� P�w��� 1� 5
�f ,� `
• � . `� � �� a� .� W, V S`"� ��%� ��' ��.. ��
z l /
��
. i : f�� It
.�_ p
. .�p , •K ��,�;�,s ���' tY'-r
h3�� $� �, \ �/� � � . �'K �.�
. �``,�`�� � ,
� ��s.��'� �i; ' 4 , :��
,,� i �l��;r� �
�� �.-� � �° ,�- ' ,>x
�� y},�''�� :
'� �r. ` ��
�S, r -".•'�P+�.�'+w.���.. +.�1 �t, J"/' � '���' .F.
� .. � ,�g`� � �� .
�.,.v "� .��„- � t r.�, "�'W„`-,#�
Y„�„� J� �.� �'�a ���~+':%
s �'� i�, t*.�.' ..
.� �,
.�� �., ;, ,}� ,R,�'f
��, �
� � a,
.N �3��L�� �
4���'a��:s���� ^c x
�t��� ,�,��