FLD2011-07024; 21311 US HWY 19 N; DREW 19 SHOPPING CENTER �
21311 US HIGHWAY 19 N
Date Received: 7/1/2011 9:25:55 AM
Drew 19 shopping center
ZONING DISTRICT: Commercial
LAND USE: Commercial General
ATLAS PAGE: 291A
PLANNER OF RECORD:
PLANNER: Kevin Nurnberger, Planner III
.
CDB Meeting Date: October 18, 2011
Case Number: FLD2011-07024
Agenda Item: D. 2.
Owner/Applicant: Brown-19 LLC
Agent: Avid Group
Address: 21311 US Highwav I9 North
CITY OF CLEARWATER
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
STAFF REPORT
GENERAL INFORMATION:
REQUEST: Flexible Development application to permit a 17,200 square foot
addition to an existing 74,241 square foot retail sales and service
building in the Commercial (C) District with a lot area of 739,872
square feet (16.99 acres), a lot width of 590 square feet (along US
Highway 19 N) and 1,445 square feet (along Drew Street), front (west)
setbacks of 10 feet (to pavement) and 15 feet (to building), front (north)
setbacks of 5 feet (to pavement) and 50.4 feet (to building), side (east)
setbacks of 32 feet (to pavement) and 111.8 feet (to building), side
(south) setbacks of 36.8 feet (to pavement) and 61 feet (to building),
side (east) setbacks of 7.6 feet (to pavement) and 178.2 feet (to
building), and side (south) setbacks of zero feet (to pavement), 20 feet
(to loading dock), and 34.8 feet (to building), a building height of 28.4
feet (to flat roo� and 39.3 feet (to top of cornice), and 822 off-street
parking spaces (4.04 spaces per 1000 square feet of GFA) as a
Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project under the provisions of
the Community Development Code Section 2-704.C., as well as a
reduction to the front (west) perimeter buffer from 15 feet to 10 feet, a
reduction to the front (north) perimeter buffer from 15 feet to 5 feet, a
reduction to the side (east)perimeter buffer from 10 feet to 7.6 feet, and
a reduction to the side (south) perimeter buffer from 10 feet to zero feet
as a Comprehensive Landscape Program under the provisions of the
Community Development Code Section 3-1202.G.
ZONING DISTRICT: Commercial (C) District
FUTURE LAND USE
PLAN CATEGORY: Commercial General (CG)
PROPERTY USE: Current: Retail Sales and Services
Proposed: Retail Sales and Services
EXISTING North: C and Medium High Density Attached Dwellings,
SURROUNDING Residential (MHDR) Districts Retail Sales and Services
ZONING AND USES: South: MHDR District Attached Dwellings
East: Office (0) and MHDR Districts Attached Dwellings
West: C District Retail Sales and Services
Community Development Board—October 18,2011
FLD201 1-07024—Page 1
.
ANALYSIS:
Site Location and Existing Conditions:
The 16.99 acre subject property is located at the southeast corner of US Highway 19 North and
Drew Street. It is a corner lot with ingress/egress onto Drew Street and US Highway 19 North
service road. The site consists of two, one-story, masonry block commercial buildings with one
building located along the east side of the property and the other is on the south side of the
property. The northeast building consists of approximately 133,657 square feet of retail and
storage space and has two primary tenants which are Best Buy and Rooms to Go. The building
sited to the southwest is currently 74,241 square feet of retail space and consists of three tenants
which are Guitar Center, Marshalls, and Babies R Us.
In 1994, as a part of the widening of US Highway 19 North service road, the subject property
lost significant land area along both Drew Street and US Highway 19 North service road
resulting in the elimination of 107 parking spaces. In 2002, the applicant received an approval
for a Flexible Standard Development (FLS 01-12-91) request to reduce the required front (west)
setback along US Highway 19 North service road from 15 feet to 10 feet (to pavement) and to
reduce the number of required parking spaces from 911 to 787 parking spaces (4.32 spaces per
1,000 square feet of gross floor area) to allow for a 7,899 addition to the subject building. This
redevelopment of the site resulted in the loss of 51 parking spaces to comply with required
landscaping standards. Following this redevelopment project, in 2005, a portion of the subject
building was expanded by 5,000 square foot to increase the tenant space that is currently
occupied by the Guitar Center.
To the north, across Drew Street are a few commercial properties consisting of a car wash,
automobile dealership, and a small shopping center. Further east along the north side of Drew
Street is a residential development consisting of attached dwellings. Abutting the subject
property to the south and east are residential developments consisting of attached dwellings.
Development Proposal:
The request proposes to expand the existing 74,241 building on the south side of the property by
adding 17,200 square feet of retail space. It will allow a Toys R Us to share retail space with the
existing Babies R Us now occupying a tenant space within the subject building. This addition
will be on the west side of the building adjacent to US Highway 19 N, and when constructed will
result in the loss of twenty-two parking spaces that currently exist within the project area. The
applicant will replace these parking spaces as well as add fifty-five additional parking spaces
resulting in increasing the number of parking spaces from 775 to 822 parking spaces. This will
be accomplished by reducing the size of existing interior islands, adding a number of spaces to
the ends of existing rows where opportunity allows, and by constructing new parking areas in the
northwest corner of the property. When built the new addition will be setback fifteen feet from
the front property line along US Highway 19 North Service Road. It will be 28.4 feet in height
to flat roof and 39.3 feet in height to the top of the cornice and will be architecturally identical to
the existing building. An ADA walkway will be built in front of the new addition and connected
to the walkways on site and those in the right-of-way. Other site improvements include,
restriping portions of the parking lot, constructing a new loading dock behind Babies R Us,
erecting a new retaining wall along a portion of the side property line near the project area,
expanding the retention pond adjacent to the east wall of the subject building, adding
Community Development Board—October 18,2011
FLD201 1-07024—Page 2
landscaping within allowable areas, and remodeling the interior space of Best Buy to create a
new 8,301 square foot retail sales and service space for a future tenant.
The proposal's compliance with the applicable development standards of the Community
Development Code (CDC) is discussed below.
Floor Area Ratio (FAR): Pursuant to the Countywide Plan Rules and CDC Section 2-701.1, the
maximum allowable FAR is 0.55. The overall proposed FAR is 0.30, which is consistent with
the Code provisions.
Impervious Surface Ratio (ISRZ Pursuant to the Countywide Plan Rules and CDC Section 2-
701.1, the maximum allowable ISR is 0.90. The overall proposed ISR is 0.$7, which is
consistent with the Code provisions.
Minimum Lot Area and Width: Pursuant to CDC Table 2-704, there is no minimum required lot
area or lot width for a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project. However, for a point of
comparison, the minimtun lot area requirement for retail sales and services is 10,000 square feet.
The subject property has a lot area of 739,872 square feet (16.99 acres). The minimum lot width
requirement for a retail sales and services is 100 feet. The width of the subject property is 590
square feet along US Highway 19 N and 1,445 square feet along Drew Street. The proposal is
consistent with these criteria.
Minimum Setbacks: Pursuant to CDC Table 2-704, there are no minimum setback requirements
for a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project. However, for a point of comparison, the
minimum front setback requirement for retail sales and services can range between 15 and 25
feet while side setbacks may range between zero and 10 feet. Specific to this project are the
setbacks to front (west) setbacks of 10 feet (to pavement) and 15 feet (to building), a front
(north) setback of 5 feet (to pavement), and side (south) setbacks of zero feet (to pavement) and
20 feet (to loading dock). The requested flexibility in front setbacks reflect the applicants'
proposal to provide the minimum fifteen foot front setback for the new addition while trying to
provide a sufficient number of parking spaces on site. Side setbacks will allow for an updated
loading dock and a new retaining wall. Each setback is within the range of flexibility allowed
by CDC Table 2-704. Due to the existing and proposed improvements on site, the requested
setbacks to pavement and structures are acceptable to Staff.
Maximum Buildin� Hei� Pursuant to CDC Table 2-704, there is no maximum allowable
height for a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project. However, for a point of comparison,
the maximum building height for retail sales and services can range between 25 and 50 feet. The
proposed height of the building addition is 28.4 feet (to flat roo� and 39.7 feet (to top of
cornice). The proposed building height is less than the Code provisions.
Minimum Off-Street Parkin�: Pursuant to CDC Table 2-704, the minimum required parking for a
Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project is determined by the Community Development
Coordinator based on the specific use and/or ITE Manual standards. The off-street parking
requirement for retail sales and service uses is between 4 and 5 spaces per 1,000 square feet of
gross floor area. This property was granted a parking space reduction in 2002 from 911 to 787
Community Development Board—October 18,2011
FLD2011-07024—Page 3
parking spaces at a parking ratio of 4.32 spaces per 1,000 square feet of gross floor area. To off-
set for the increase in gross floor area, the applicant proposes to increase the number of parking
spaces by adding 77 spaces, bringing the total number of spaces to 822 parking spaces which
calculates to a parking ratio of 4.04 spaces per 1,000 square feet of gross floor area. Although
there is an increase in the number of parking spaces it is still less than the previously approved
parking ratio. For this reason, Staff required a parking demand study to justify the reduction to
the sites parking standards.
The parking demand study indicates that 814 parking spaces (4.0 spaces per 1,000 square feet of
gross floor area) will be adequate for this shopping center after the building expansion. Based on
several site visits during the weekday and weekend, the applicants' consultants determined that
the existing parking demand is significantly lower than the available parking supply. The actual
study was carried out over a weekend period and found that the overall parking demand occurred
between 2:30 to 2:45 PM on Saturday and between 2:15 and 2:30 PM on Sunday. For the
purpose of conducting the parking lot survey, the parking areas were broken out into six parking
zones. Most customers parked in Zone 1 and Zone 2 which are the parking areas directly in front
of each building. The total number of parking spaces occupied during the peak time on Saturday
was 300 spaces; while 294 parking spaces were occupied during Sunday's peak period. Zone 6,
the parking area to be eliminated by the building expansion had only one automobile park within
its area throughout the time of study. Therefore, the parking demand study demonstrates that
814 parking spaces at a ratio of 4.0 spaces per 1,000 square feet will be adequate to meet the
parking demand at the proposed shopping center; thereby justifying the decrease from the
existing parking ratio of 4.32 spaces per 1,000 square feet of gross floor area. Nevertheless, the
applicant prefers to provide 822 parking spaces at a parking ratio of 4.04 spaces per 1,000 rather
than 814 parking spaces at a ratio of 4.0 spaces per 1,000 square feet as found in the parking
demand study. The applicant believes that retaining eight parking spaces will alleviate
unforeseen parking issues, if any. The number of proposed parking spaces (822) as well as a
reduction to the current parking ratio to 4.04 spaces per 1,000 square feet of gross floor area is
acceptable by staff at this location.
In addition,the applicant proposes to add twenty-one parking spaces at a 65 degree parking angle
to replicate existing conditions on site. This parking angle is foremost on this site; however,
CDC Section 3-1402 standards do not recognize this angle any longer. Most of the parking
spaces were constructed prior to the adoption of the Community Development Code. Since the
project valuation is less than 25 percent, the applicant is not required to bring the entire parking
area to code. However, in sections where parking spaces are to be added they will be designed
and dimensioned to match existing spaces at the 65 degree parking angle. Given that only a low
number of spaces are to be created at the 65 degree parking angle in comparison to the overall
number of existing spaces, it was found not necessary for the applicant to restripe the parking lot
to meet current code dimensions for parking spaces by Traffic Engineering.
Landscapi•n�: Pursuant to CDC Section 3-1202.D.1, this site is required a 15 foot wide landscape
buffer along both Drew Street and US Highway 19 N., as well as a 10 foot wide landscape
buffers within each side yard. The application includes a request for a reduction to the front
landscape buffer along US Highway 19 North to 10 feet, a reduction in the front landscape buffer
along Drew Street to 5 feet, a reduction in the side (east) landscape buffer to 7.6 feet (to existing
Community Development Board—October 18,2011
FLD2011-07024—Page 4
pavement), and a reduction in the side (south) landscape buffer to zero feet. As mentioned
earlier, the setback and landscape buffer flexibility request for this project mostly reflect existing
conditions on site. Where the applicant will be completing work directly related to this project is
mostly along US Highway 19 North service road, a portion of Drew Street, and the side (south)
landscape buffer. The reduction in the front landscape buffer will allow for additional parking.
Little space is available to increase the width of existing landscaping buffers; however, where
possible the applicant has proposed to add the required number of trees as well as provide
additional trees to exceed the minimum landscaping standard. The side (south) setback area
where the reduction request is to zero feet, will allow the applicant to build a new retaining wall
and expand the width of the pavement for delivery vehicles utilizing the new loading docks. The
requested reductions to the landscape perimeter buffers are acceptable to Staff.
In regards to landscaping along the front and side of the building addition, the landscape plan
shows that 100 percent the building fa�ade will planted as set forth in CDC Section 3-1202.E.
The foundation plantings along Drew Street and US Highway 19 North service road are within
an area that is a minimum of five feet wide and consist of at least three palm trees for every 40
linear feet of building fa�ade and one shrub for every 20 square feet of required landscape area.
A minimum of 50 percent of the area is shown to contain shrubs with the remainder to be ground
cover. However, as set forth in CDC Section 3-1202.D., one shade tree every 35 feet is required
within the front perimeter buffer (along US Highway 19 North service road). The length of this
buffer would require five shade trees. The applicant has chosen not to plant the required number
of shade trees; rather, to mitigate for the deviations to the landscape buffer requirements, they
intend to plant nine accent trees (crape myrtles) and four palm tree clusters to exceed required
landscape standards. These trees in combination with the foundation plantings should provide an
attractive vegetative buffer that enhances the visual appearance in this traffic corridor; yet, the
landscape plan does not show that any type of shrub will be added within this buffer. Staff
recommends that Indian Hawthorne or Jasmine groundcover be included to further enhance the
landscaping within this landscape buffer along US Highway 19 North service road. All proposed
plant material shall be Florida No. 1 grade or better. The planting of more trees than the required
number within the front (west) landscape perimeter buffer is an acceptable alternative to Staff.
As mentioned earlier, the applicant will slightly deviate from the parking demand study finding
and provide 822 parking spaces on site rather than 814 parking spaces recommended by the
parking demand study's findings. This decision elevates the parking demand ratio from 4.0
spaces per 1,000 square feet to 4.04 spaces per 1,000 square feet which is within the acceptable
range in CDC Table 2-704. Increasing the number of parking spaces requires the applicant to
modify an existing interior island and eliminate two islands. An interior island in the southwest
area of the parking lot will be divided into two islands that will meet the interior parking island
standards set forth in CDC Section 3-1202.E. Two islands will be removed due to the redesign
of the parking lot; however, they will be replaced further north then their current location to
allow for the extension of two parking rows to increase the number of parking spaces. In
addition, the applicant will add three new code compliant landscaped interior islands within the
parking area to increase green space in the parking area and to comply with Staff's requirement
that a reduction to the number of parking spaces found by the parking demand study will result
in converting existing parking spaces into additional parking lot interior islands. Pursuant to
Community Development Board—October 18,2011
FLD201 1-07024—Page 5
CDC Sections 3-1202.E.1, the final Vehicle Use Area green space percentage will be 18.04
percent which exceeds the ten percent of the gross vehicular use area provision.
In accordance with CDC Sections 3-1204 and 3-1205, the applicant intends to use this
redevelopment opportunity to upgrade all the existing parking lot interior landscape islands not
affected by the parking lot improvements. All these interior islands will be preserved with each
tree being thinned of dead or broken branches. While the existing shell or mulch within the
interior islands will be removed to be replaced with ground cover plants. In addition, within the
front perimeter buffers, all dead sod or grass areas will be re-graded and replaced with new sod.
Furthermore, four mature crepe myrtle trees will be preserved and relocated from an area where
new parking spaces will be constructed to an interior island near the Drew Street entrance. New
plant beds will be installed in this island to further visually enhance the landscaping at this
entrance.
Comprehensive Landscape Program: Pursuant to Section 3-1202.G of the Community
Development Code, the landscaping requirements contained within the Code can be waived or
modified if the application contains a Comprehensive Landscape Program satisfying certain
criteria. The following table depicts the consistency of the development proposal with those
criteria:
Consistent Inconsistent
1. Architectural theme:
a. The landscaping in a comprehensive landscape program shall be designed as a N/A N/A
part of the architectural theme of the principle buildings proposed or developed on
the parcel proposed for development;or
b. The design, character, location and/or materials of the landscape treatment X
proposed in the comprehensive landscape program shall be demonstrably more
attractive than landscaping otherwise permitted on the parcel proposed for
development under the minimum landscape standards.
2. Lighting. Any lighting proposed as a part of a comprehensive landscape program is X
automatically controlled so that the lighting is turned off when the business is closed.
3. Community character: The landscape treatment proposed in the comprehensive X
landscape program will enhance the community character of the City of Clearwater.
4. Property values: The landscape treatment proposed in the comprehensive landscape X
program will have a beneficial impact on the value of property in the immediate
vicinity of the parcel proposed for development.
5. Special area or scenic corridor plan: The landscape treatment proposed in the N/A N/A
comprehensive landscape program is consistent with any special area or scenic
corridor plan which the City of Clearwater has prepared and adopted for the area in
which the parcel proposed for development is located.
Solid Waste: The placement of the new verti-pack dumpster on the south side of building
addition has been found to be acceptable by the City's Solid Waste Department.
Si�ht Visibilit�Tr'i,angl�es: Pursuant to CDC Section 3-904.A, to minimize hazards at the
driveways, no structures or landscaping may be installed which will obstruct views at a level
between 30 inches above grade and eight feet above grade within 20-foot sight visibility
triangles. No structure or landscaping is proposed within the site triangles.
Code Enforcement Analysis: There are no active Code Enforcement cases for the subject
property.
Community Development Board-October 18,2011
FLD201 1-07024-Page 6
- ___ _
COMPLIANCE WITH STANDARDS AND CRITERIA:
The following table depicts the consistency of the development proposal with the standards of
the Commercial General (CG) land use category and the Commercial (C) District as per CDC
Section 2-701.1 and Table 2-704:
Standard Proposed Consistent Inconsistent
FAR 0.55 0.30 X
ISR 0.90 0.87 X
Minimum Lot Area N/A 739,872 sq.ft.(16.99 acres) X
Minimum Lot Width N/A US 19 N: 590 feet X
Drew: 1,445 feet X
Minimum Setbacks Front: N/A West: 10 feet(to pavement) X
l5 feet(to building)
North: 5 feet(to pavement) X
50.4 feet(to building)
Side: N/A East: 7.6 feet(to pavement) X
32 feet(to pavement)
111.6 feet(to building)
178.2 feet(to building)
South: Zero feet(to pavement) X
36.8 feet(to pavement)
20 feet(to loading dock)
34.8 feet(to building)
61 feet(to building)
Maximum Height N/A 28.4 feet(to flat roofl X
393 feet(to cornice)
Minimum 4-5 spaces per 1,000 SF GFA 822 parking spaces(4.04 spaces per X
Off-Street Parking (Specific to this project 4.32 1,000 square feet of GFA)
spaces per 1,000 square feet
of GFA
Community Development Board—October 18,2011
FLD201 1-07024—Page 7
COMPLIANCE WITH FLEXIBILITY CRITERIA:
The following table depicts the consistency of the development proposal with the Flexibility
criteria as per CDC Section 2-703.0 (Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project):
Consistent Inconsistent
1. The development or redevelopment is otherwise impractical without deviations from X
the use and/or development standards set forth in this zoning district.
2. The development or redevelopment will be consistent with the goals and policies of X
the Comprehensive Plan, as well as with the general purpose, intent and basic
planning objectives of this Code, and with the intent and purpose of this zoning
district.
3. The development or redevelopment will not impede the normal and orderly X
development and improvement of surrounding properties.
4. Adjoining properties will not suffer substantial detriment as a result of the proposed X
development
5. The proposed use shall otherwise be permitted by the underlying future land use X
category, be compatible with adjacent land uses, will not substantially alter the
essential use characteristics of the neighborhood;and shall demonstrate compliance
with one or more of the following objectives:
a. The proposed use is permitted in this zoning district as a minimum standard,
flexible standard or flexible development use;
b. The proposed use would be a significant economic contributor to the City's
economic base by diversifying the local economy or by creating jobs;
c. The development proposal accommodates the expansion or redevelopment of an
existing economic contributor;
d. The proposed use provides for the provision of affordable housing;
e. The proposed use provides for development or redevelopment in an area that is
characterized by other similar development and where a land use plan
amendment and rezoning would result in a spot land use or zoning designation;
or
f. The proposed use provides for the development of a new and/or preservation of a
working waterfront.
6. Flexibility with regard to use, lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street X
parking are justified based on demonstrated compliance with all of the following
design objectives:
a. The proposed development will not impede the normal and orderly development
and improvement of the sunounding properties for uses permitted in this zoning
district;
b. The proposed development complies with applicable design guidelines adopted
by the City;
c. The design, scale and intensity of the proposed development supports the
established or emerging character of an area;
d. In order to form a cohesive, visually interesting and attractive appearance, the
proposed development incorporates a substantial number of the following design
elements:
❑ Changes in horizontal building planes;
❑ Use of architectural details such as columns, comices, stringcourses,
pilasters,porticos,balconies,railings,awnings,eta;
❑ Variety in materials,colors and textures;
❑ Distinctive fenestration patterns;
❑ Building step backs;and
❑ Distinctive roofs forms.
e. The proposed development provides for appropriate buffers,enhanced landscape
desi n and a ro riate distances between buildin s.
Community Development Board—October 18,2011
FLD201 1-07024—Page 8
COMPLIANCE WITH GENERAL STANDARDS FOR LEVEL TWO APPROVALS:
The following table depicts the consistency of the development proposal with the General
Standards for Level Two Approvals as per CDC Section 3-914.A:
Consistent Inconsistent
1. The proposed development of the land will be in hazmony with the scale, bulk, X
coverage,density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located.
2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage development and use of X
adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof.
3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons X
residing or working in the neighborhood.
4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. X
5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the X
immediate vicinity.
6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including X
visual,acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts on adjacent properties.
SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION:
The Development Review Committee (DRC) reviewed the application and supporting materials
at its meeting of August 4, 2011, and deemed the development proposal to be legally sufficient to
move forward to the Community Development Board (CDB), based upon the following:
Findin�s of Fact. The Planning and Development Department, having reviewed all evidence
submitted by the applicant and requirements of the Community Development Code, finds that
there is substantial competent evidence to support the following findings of fact:
1. The 16.99 acre subject property is located at the southeast corner of US Highway 19 North
and Drew Street;
2. That the subject property is located within the Commercial (C) District and the Commercial
General (CG) Future Land Use Plan category;
3. The site is currently improved with two, one-story, masonry block commercial buildings with
207,898 square feet of gross floor area;
4. The subject property has a lot area of 739,872 square feet (16.99 acres), a lot width of 590
square feet (along US Highway 19 N) and 1,445 square feet(along Drew Street);
5. The maximum allowable FAR is 0.55, the proposed FAR is 0.30;
6. The maximum allowable ISR is 0.90, the proposed ISR is 0.87;
7. The application proposes to expand the southwest building by adding a 17,200 square foot
addition to accommodate a new retail sales and service space;
8. The request includes flexibility to front (west) setbacks of 10 feet (to pavement) and 15 feet
(to building), front (north) setbacks of 5 feet (to pavement) and 50.4 feet (to building), side
(east) setbacks of 32 feet (to pavement) and 111.6 feet (to building), side (south) setbacks of
36.8 feet (to pavement) and 61 feet (to building), side (east) setbacks of 7.6 feet (to
pavement) and 178.2 feet (to building), and side (south) setbacks of zero feet (to pavement),
20 feet(to loading dock), and 34.8 feet(to building);
9. The building addition will be 28.4 feet in height (to flat roo� and 39.3 feet (to top of
cornice);
Community Development Board—October 18,2011
FLD2011-07024—Page 9
10. The development proposes to increase the number of off-street parking spaces from 785 to 822
spaces;
11. The submitted parking demand study demonstrates that 822 off-street parking spaces will be
adequate for a parking needs for the overall shopping center during all periods of hours of
operation;
12. The building addition with an increase in the number of off-street parking spaces will result in
a decrease in the parking area ratio from 4.32 spaces per ground floor area to 4.04 parking
spaces per ground floor area;
13. The application proposes to reduce the front (west) perimeter buffer from 15 feet to 10 feet
(along US Highway 19 North), to reduce the front (north) perimeter buffer from 15 feet to 5
feet (along Drew Street), to reduce the side (east) perimeter buffer from 10 feet to 7.6 feet,
and to reduce the side (south) perimeter buffer from 10 feet to zero feet through the
Comprehensive Landscape Program;
14. The proposed Comprehensive Landscape Program will provide additional landscaping within
green spaces and interior islands as well as retain a number of shade trees and accent trees; and
15. There are no active Code Enforcement cases for the subject property.
Conclusions of Law. The Planning and Development Department, having made the above
findings of fact, reaches the following conclusions of law:
l. That the development proposal is consistent with the Standards as per Section 2-701.1 and
Table 2-703 of the Community Development Code;
2. That the development proposal is consistent with the Flexibility criteria as per Section 2-
704.0 of the Community Development Code;
3. That the development proposal is consistent with the General Standards for Level Two
Approvals as per Section 3-914.A of the Community Development Code; and
4. That the development proposal is consistent with the criteria of the Comprehensive
Landscape Program as per Section 3-1202.G of the Community Development Code.
Based upon the above, the Planning and Development Department recommends APPROVAL of
this Flexible Development application to permit a 17,200 square foot addition to an existing
74,241 square foot retail sales and service building in the Commercial (C) District with a lot area
of 739,872 square feet (16.99 acres), a lot width of 590 square feet (along US Highway 19 N)
and 1,445 square feet (along Drew Street), front (west) setbacks of 10 feet (to pavement) and 15
feet (to building), front (north) setbacks of 5 feet (to pavement) and 50.4 feet (to building), side
(east) setbacks of 32 feet(to pavement) and 111.8 feet (to building), side (south) setbacks of 36.8
feet (to pavement) and 61 feet (to building), side (east) setbacks of 7.6 feet (to pavement) and
178.2 feet (to building), and side (south) setbacks of zero feet (to pavement), 20 feet (to loading
dock), and 34.8 feet (to building), a building height of 28.4 feet (to flat roo� and 39.3 feet (to top
of cornice), and 822 off-street parking spaces (4.04 spaces per 1000 square feet of GFA) as a
Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project under the provisions of the Community
Development Code Section 2-704.C., as well as a reduction to the front (west) perimeter buffer
from 15 feet to 10 feet, a reduction to the front (north) perimeter buffer from 15 feet to 5 feet, a
reduction to the side (east) perimeter buffer from 10 feet to 7.6 feet, and a reduction to the side
(south) perimeter buffer from 10 feet to zero feet as a Comprehensive Landscape Program under
Community Development Board—October 18,2011
FLD201 1-07024—Page 10
the provisions of the Community Development Code Section 3-1202.G., subject to the following
conditions:
Conditions of Approval:
1. That a building permit be obtained for the parking lot improvements, landscaping and
building improvements;
2. That prior to the issuance of a building permit, the landscape plan shall be revised to show
that either Indian Hawthorne or Jasmine groundcover added into the perimeter buffer
adjacent to the new addition along US Highway 19 North service Road;
3. That prior to the issuance of any permits, the applicant shall comply with all requirements of
the Engineering Department;
4. That all existing and any future signage must meet the requirements of Code and be
architecturally integrated with the design of the building with regard to proportion, color,
material and finish as part of a final sign package submitted to and approved by Staff;
5. That prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy all of the proposed landscaping shall
be installed.
�
;
,° �'�
Prepared by Planning and Development Department Staff:
evin W. u berger, Planner III
ATTACHMENTS:Location Map;Aerial Map;Zoning Map;Existing Surrounding Uses Map;and Photographs
S:IPlanning DepartmentlC D BIFLEX(FLD)IPending casesl Up for the next CDBI US Highway 19 N 21311-Drew 19 Shopping Center(C)-
2011.xx-KWNIDREW 19 Staff Report.docx
Community Development Board—October 18,2011
FLD20ll-07024—Page 11
Kevin W.Nurnberger
100 S Myrtle Avenue
Clearwater,FL 33756
727-562-4567
kevin.nun�ber�er c�i myclearvvater.com
PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE
Planner III March 2011 to present
Planner II October 2010 to March 2011
City of Clearwater, Clearwater, Florida
Duties include performing the technical review and preparation of staff reports for various land
development applications, the organization of data and its display in order to track information and
provide status reports, and making presentations to various City Boards and Committees.
Planner
County of York, Yorktown, Virginia 2007 to 2009
Reviewed residential, commercial and mixed use development site plans to ensure compliance with
planning, zoning, subdivision, historic preservation, and environmental standards as well as design
criteria, specifications, regulations, codes and ordinances. Led pre-application meetings with residents,
neighborhood organizations, contractors, and developers regarding future projects which included state
and local government agencies.
Site Assistant
Gahan and Long Ltd, Belfast, Northern Ireland 2006 to 2007
Enforced Article 3 of the Planning Order (NI) with land owners, developers and district councils on
procedures relating to archaeological and built heritage remains on proposed development sites. On site
assistant to project manager during the archeological process throughout the pre-development stage.
Development Planner
Versar Inc, Fort Story/Fort Eustis, Virginia 2005 to 2006
Developed survey strategies for the Cultural Resource Manager by reviewing local and state planning
documents, the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Preservation Planning on Federal installations,
the Virginia Department of Historic Resources, the Virginia Department of Transportation plan, and
Virginia Power's public utility plan in the predevelopment stages of new development and building
expansion projects to ensure protection of historic properties.
City Planner
City Planning Commission, New Orleans, Louisiana 2000 to 2005
Primary subdivision planner assisting applicants throughout the subdivision process in accordance with
the zoning and subdivision regulations of the City of New Orleans. Reviewed various zoning and
conditional use applications. Prepared and presented staff reports to the City Planning Commission and
Board of Zoning Adjustments.
EDUCATION
University of New Orleans,LA
MA Urban and Regional Planning(2004)
State University of New York at Buffalo,NY
BA Anthropology(1999)
�'' �Y,4. . ° :�
`.g � .�_.�k�.:G____._-f�_._._ '.:_.� � -�, �� y �
.� � a Fr'.IRiM1'OD o o �
`t � � 2 2
� : — - � aD
� _ eF �
..�n��_.__.�.a � L,�
RC � Briaa�'oor
� �
� � C
O
�---�-_-�- � PROJECT
i :: a " SI TE
;.',:'. . .
� _ . _- __
� o �
� >
w� �
iJ C�
�
U
,P+�
`j � �
=� r'amhridge Cir. c
� �
��(n o r=:.-c..�-.t
CL �
� �
�g W
>
Q
ST ��-% SE,,L
�
ST _°— �
z d
� �
� � a
¢
a =
SR-6G `r
°m
°�d
x
s
4' v.E C]
LOCATION
Owner: Brown-19 LLC Case: FLD2011-07024
Site: 21211 US Highway !9 North Property Size: 16.99 acres
PIN: 17-29-16-00000-220-0100 Atlas Page: 291 A
N
8
i � 450
�o ,r
N 6�ry 440 a Z
`L o y
p� � i°. 430 Q "
� N � ° tl
z ?
' 21699 410 400
z �1651 340 W
N N � Q �
� /��,�//]\/
I 2�649 b N I��1J 2� Q
N
310 Q
631 Q
� 300�
, 216 � � 230
e�p... N N �
$ Q 22� 240 Q
' „F'1.�.�0��• �� � / N q N �
C . � �
� � eei N 2fO 2OO ry
N N
DREW ST
DOT 21489SIG
v� p� 2148��
`� � 21409
^ 'A� 21421 �
N `�+ M
21466 � } N I
� r�
z'�1464, �' 21415 �
i
� � � 2621
n .�
� 21411
213J8 ' * •- �n rn N ��-� aa,
p1 � M n "� �M M M'v rn
213�� N N N � NNN NN '�p
2615 .\\
1 � ^
`�0�"� �� �` 6
\5
212�2 `�6'i� / \� \`�2,�
-v �
2,2 o MHDR CAMBR/DGE CIR Zsso
��
zsos !
I 21227
� � �
o s�s
211i4 21133 `� ' Q
� J
� � 2�00
2�os �o �
1 2�oa� I vQ �o,
DR �, z,o5, � � � Q
� (%� 21021 � ��Q'� �.�p�
I , I �BO Q
ZONING
Owner: Brown-19 LLC Case: FLD2011-07024
Site: 21211 US Highway !9 North Property Size: 16.99 acres
PIN: 17-29-16-00000-220-0100 Atlas Page: 291 A
21830 O N
2,82� 2,8 ^
2181� 9J9 Ac¢� fp p�p ��
21800 � m q, v _ �
21790 z M•� y N O ti6� � o �
�.J �
a
� i9.66 AcFi ? �
, r—� 21899 4�1b`"' �
Lsa a J ��4
2��1851 340 ;
21750 N� oo � 330 530 Q
°� �"` 849 m N
� e� 320 O
, ;�* 310 O
_ zos n�R� 831
� a �'i 218.,� � � 230 30 �
e.�.' ,� y `� �' � 22O 24O�
�n�F� • '.°2�t59P`v�. ? N m `°
e} ...T. �,� N
� �O N
`r ..�°"•, "°" N N 21O 2OO
DS A - A � = p
� _ DREW ST
N
h �r 21489SfG -
^ � m 1409
N � 21421 N
� L,9,., � 214 � �., N
ti
� � 21415
m Q 2821
"° ,e.e, �<a, p1411
P� S � t"f M M � MP'fM ty� NOf
O see r '
� wao� N N N NNN� �
380 AcF�
21 0 2815
6`ti�
,,, 'y
Q 21 52 �6`j�
328 Acc� •." O
^ 263
�11 0 ^ iva n�
y 2606
.' J 21227
Q „�� o �s,�
's' �", 21133 � N s
211 � ,., � 5s� ��
�
w4y
O ,sa n�R�10 4 , 7
——'i
—� v u.n 2� BAO •
� ..� �+'8 �:OK�
EXISTING CONDITIONS
Owner: Brown-19 LLC Case: FLD2011-07024
Site: 21211 US Highway !9 North Property Size: 16.99 acres
PIN: 17-29-16-00000-220-0100 Atlas Page: 291 A
, �
� �• �� ,� � � s�� '�� ,�I• ��ti. � �'y s > ,.k, �
� � ` ` � � �, ' {s:� �� "'' ��, `, ����j ' ' �
��.��tt� � �� , �� � r � :'iii'�� �, �''� : �
,.r� -- F : ;' � G � g• s�
�, _ . sD. � �, ��� � s• - � �i � , � ,- �,� � `�
� � a ..:1�• .. '�� . ''✓1 "•� *. � 6 ,� h`•,;� � M , `,�; � ^..� �� (, , �
, _ - `'-� ; i �1
; . , t ��_yi, .�1 r`r 4. � .
,
�f �
_.. . �,�q�
. .
',' �'� ' �� �""��5� ) . .} � !r-:! � (�� y,� ���
`� t} � .� _� � ..�� �
L..
�t..�l; �� t �. � , � � f,. •S � N� � � �� ' � ,_v.
�.,�nl�r r� r.�l . .; %�� '$ � �� �� ,� �.�,.�'* 31 '' , r
� . . C� �� 1. , � , �� -��# r� 5�. ,�I 1 r -x. ��.
�F �f iR
.� � � . ; � • ��. � ►. _,:� , �. r/ � }y
y� ��j >^{ �ya � �f�- ��`'v M1
� R �. 'e� � � �• � , f11. � _ ^ .a �� �
.,F� e : � � �� � � ��
� . � �, � � �' +� Y���. � y �.' 1� , � !'1y , , • (�j ��
I � e
. � ^ p4
.
�. t � ..
� '
� i:
� . ._rW'i�,�� C�� '� � � w I �A.�� �j��ff T1 f � ��� .�� '�{_�. ` . ..
. _«�.. �_ �� _ ; � � - ��. ���,.�L�l:�'�'��1'
.
� w - � �G ,
_ .. . . ,. - � �r,1.
,. �d..�
,� , , - ,� -,
.,.d:F.�..
�� �, ,� ,��� M�'� •.,. . . �
� � �
t .
� � �� � � �, � � ii�'�//,�ti,� � !� �I
�;, - ' '':� �: ' � 3 �;,";�,��� _ . �. � � I � 'j
,� :�. a ';�r �� � �� r , � " ' ' 3, J
=y , ��• . .� � , _ � �. �� � -r � �
s. '�' '� � � � '� 1 s��� R . �e � Y�!�+�� r,.d .. . ��. a• y .
� ,�. � * +'+, •.�"(¢w` � . � `� �' . � 1. �� �i
x �� n:�,�. . � i¢ �� .� + q� • ; � �:_ - '
� r+� ' 1 'S ! 1. {� ' +
/�.,� �� � �� � `� ��1*1N�,. S �� . t «.�:.'i� . .
]�:'�� �/ ••I�/� '�� l� � A
' , � �`�a Jf � ' . � � � . „ R�'' ,q
,' �� • • ' :N'
�� � � r��� _ ; • � . �+ ,r4� °:
1. ' . :.,� �:�h'!h-,� � • I�� . . � fi��,j� � � .� !+'1�� ,�+.��. ;
� � _ `� r�x�, ` ��t � � � � +.�, � �
, . _
� `{' �" �� � e � r�� � . .,... . ... ...�.��� �` �� � ��1 i
� � i
� � �y�}# � *,'��i^fM{ w�f�� ` � � � . i�•, r� ':. �\`�'+ �� �
# �...-��-�:.�`,-��,� 1�f�'� � �_ '. f� � � � �_, _ i. ` ���
� f . 1� ��' � �.. � � �+' � E� �� •4� +��)�.
:ti� � y�..I.� 1�
$ .� �_'. . {���� �*'� j � ''�/�� 'J = .*..r.' ��� '� �
�
,�, ri� -
` „� � > "g$��� �' �'Sfi'} .� i `�� �' 4= ''} ��
�. �'� ,�a "� '� . . . . - � . , ..,=<: •.� y�� e,r„�
v {�
Y � �! � � � . . `j� �4��-0 � �J�.
. y ' ��� � � �^��I
71 „ C . .
�j��� - � � � t �
i ��': . A� �C
� *;. �'J) +� � r r, t` • �{���1
'��" ��� � � f� � '?_'e� "i �'��
r �
t � . + � .,. i'''r...�1 �.,t ,� �
,w.',. �.� * � .��l��.t �.�� Y��x�.
S{:' � I��' � f
-.,.. a�� I JI _ .
..�` _.� i � � �: r, � —.. . �.. .,
� � � ' ��� � �� y � � '�, �`�
,
��' � �° 1x �J�� �� � ,�it s' s� .r �� S +
AERIAL
Owner: Brown-19 LLC Case: FLD201 1-07024
Site: 2121 1 US Highway !9 North Property Size: 16.99 acres
PIN: 1 7-29-1 6-00000-220-0 1 00 Atlas Page: 291 A
....�. � �;. � ;
:� ��
. ���rr„ � ,^�a
� ,�" .,. �"�
a 3�
�
. �
�
�+
�.
I
�� �; ..
;"2 ,1
,;��
�i= l� � ;� �°� ?��..
� � � �i :�� *�`` �* :
' : . � ��
. N;
� ... � �a,,::,�..>.
•�. .:u�«�+'�i
tA �•' ��'s ,�+
� „
�. � r
�It __
. ,,, , ��{..L' _> ..
....... � �_ _ �--
_ • ��_ � :- _ �,
� � ��;N n ,
� x
;�*3 , �x k���„.i4�F
.,.�v�,.
Looking SW at subject property. Looking SE at location of building addition
x;� t������ ,�
�r�� �
� �>�' ��w` � ��' . � � � �
{ �
i 8A6iES A'US'
. :
~ , _...�-
� _
i
'� .
, �.� . �.
� i !
,
�,� _.. Yy _`� �
F�., ,,..^�
� �'"
i�� I ���j ����, .� s
_
_
_
�
Looking S at subject redevelopment area Looking SW at subject redevelopment area adjacent to
US19N
� � , r
'„ k���� �` �
� . ,'�x�,Y.s ."' ��$ jk�S Ai..m''E r. . .. .
h"�.U9'. �+y�? t(,�� � � Ye'wp
�
y� K"
�,
�w
... . .......
� �M� , � x ,� � '
ij ...._...
,,,.. ..-n-.., r�� . � . ,
� ' �'�
_ . .�
� ;
� �
; �� ��II� - 4 _
�,�s� "�°' . � .�x��� `'�'��j.,��< _ _ ,'�°.
Looking N along US 19 North Looking W on subject property at intersection of Drew
• Street and US 19 North at areas where parking spaces and
landscaping will be added.
21311 US Highway 19 North
FLD2011-07024
2300 CURLEW ROAD, Suite 201
PALM HARBOR, FLORIDA 34683
PHONE(727)789-9500
GROUP� FAX(727)784-6662
[AUTH#6139 LC0000361 LB7345]
WWW.AVIDGROUP.COM
September 9, 2011
City of Clearwater Planning Department
100 South Myrtle Avenue
Clearwater, FL 33756
Re: Curlew & US 19 Plaza
Flexible Standard Development— Comprehensive Infill— Level II
Case No.: FLD2011-07024--21311 US HIGHWAY 19 N
Avid Job No.: 2291-001
Dear Staff:
Attached are fifteen (15) sets of revised plans in response to your comments, the DRC
meeting held on August 9, 2011 and follow up requests. My response to your comments is
shown below. For your convenience we have listed your comments in bold and our
responses in italics.
Engineering Review: Acknowledge prior to review by the Community
Development Board:
1. A copy of an approved Florida Department of Transportation permit will be provided
for all work proposed in US Highway 19 row prior to the issuance of a building permit.
Acknowledged
2. A copy of approved Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) permit
will be provided prior to the issuance of a building permit.
Acknowledged
Prior to the issuance of a Building Permit:
1. Sanitary sewer collection system is private; any new sanitary manhole cover shall
not have the words City of Clearwater on it.
Acknowledged
Prior to a Certificate of Occupancy:
1. Prior to Engineering Sanitary Sewer, Engineering Storm Water and Engineering
Final inspections, the applicant shall submit 5 sets of as-built drawings that are
signed and sealed by a State of Florida Registered Professional Engineer. The
Construction Services Inspector will field inspect as-built drawings for accuracy.
Acknowledged
General Note:
1. All resubmittals shall be accompanied with a response letter addressing how each
department condition has been met.
Acknowledged
Engineering Review
1. Relocate DDC and meter prior to starting construction. Currently the DDC is being
served by the water main that will be taken out of service. The existing building will
not have fire protection once the water main is removed.
Acknowledged
2. Replaced/off set water main should be Ductile iron pipe.
Acknowledged, see revised Utility Plan
3. Maintain proper clearance between water main and other utility.
Acknowledged, see Utility Note 14.
4. Show any utility conflicts
Acknowledged, to be detailed on construction plans
5. A line stop on the section of main rear of the building will be necessary to keep the
buildings in water when the old main is removed.
Acknowledged, see Utility Note 12.
6. Please restrain joints per City of Clearwater Specs.
Acknowledged, see Utility Note 13.
Utility Notes:
1. The City of Clearwater will provide (with cost) and install all meters and backflow
devices for the distribution system. The Utility Notes # 1 state the contractor provides.
Utility Note 1 has been revised.
2. Note#3 states that the water main distribution system will be privately owned and
maintained. The city owns the water distribution system on this site. The City of
Clearwater owns the Water mains, Service lines up to and including the water meter
itself. The system downstream of the water meter is privately owned.
Utility Note 3 has been revised.
Environmental Review DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review;
additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit
Application.
Please Note: An Asbestos Survey is usually required prior to conducting any
demolition or renovations. Please contact Pinellas County Air Quality (464-4422)for
further information.
Acknowledged, see Demolifion Note 10.
Fire Review
1) Plan shows the building length at 284' Must Comply with Ordinance No. 7617-06
Radio System Regulations for buildings, install 911 Radio Repeater! Antenna Booster
System the building exceeds the 250' horizontal feet in one dimension
ACKNOWLEDGE PRIOR TO CDB
Acknowledged
2) Plan shows the new addition and this reduces the distance between the building
and the existing fire hydrant assembly, except for hydrants that are located within the
right of way of public streets, all hydrants shall be located at least forty feet (40) from
any building. ACKNOWLEDGE PRIOR TO CDB
Acknowledged, the fire hydrant and FDC have been re%cated to the north side of the drive
as discussed at the DRC meeting.
3)A supporting fire hydrant shall be within 25-50 feet of the Fire Department
Connection, when fire hydrant and fire department connection are relocated
ACKNOWLEDGE PRIOR TO CDB
Acknowledged, the fire hydrant and FDC have been relocated to the north side of the drive
as discussed at the DRC meeting.
4) Fire Department Connection shall be arranged so that the connection is between
thirty inches (30") and thirty-six inches (36) above the finished grade at the location of
the connection. Plan does not show the elevation of this Fire Department Connection
which is at a six feet (6) above finished grade. Correct the height to meet code
ACKNOWLEDGE PRIOR TO CDB
Acknowledged, see Utility Note 15.
5) Fire Hydrant does not show any elevation the correct height to the center of the
main steamer is 18" (minimum) 36" (maximum)the current fire hydrant is at 55"
correct the height to meet code criteria see NFPA-24, 2002 edition Chapter 7 Hydrants
733* Contact Mr. Terry Labelle 5624960 x7227 Public Utilities Water Distribution Public
Utilities Coordinator for proper installation of any fire hydrant assembly.
ACKNOWLEDGE PRIOR TO CDB
Acknowledged, see Utility Note 16.
6) Plan shows an address of 21311 US Highway 19 N the Babies "R" Us is 21315 US
Highway 19N are you going to change this address? Provide details as this will have
an effect on the fire alarm notification and the Fire Department Connection signage
currently on property. ACKNOWLEDGE PRIOR TO CDB
Acknowledged
21311 is the address for the overall center, 21315 is the address for the Babies "R"US.
We are not changing any addresses.
7. Plan shows a reduction on the south side from 24 to 20 this is becoming a fire
department access road, must provide signage to meet the requirements of NFPA 1
2006 edition Chapter 18 see 18.2.3.5.2 ACKNOWLEDGE PRIOR TO CDB
Acknowledged.
8. A marked fire apparatus access road shall also be known as a fire lane. See Florida
Edition 18.2.3.5.3 Fire lanes shall be marked with freestanding signs with the wording
"NO PARKING FIRE LANE BY ORDER OF THE FIRE DEPARTMENT" or similar
wording. Such signs shall be 12 in by 18 in with white background and red letters and
shall be a maximum of seven feet in height from the roadway to the bottom part of the
sign. The signs shall be within sight of the traffic flow and be a maximum of 60 feet
apart. ACKNOWLEDGE PRIOR TO CDB
Acknowledged, see signs on revised sheet 6
9. NFPA 1 2000 Edition Chapter 3 General Provisions, 3-6 Access Boxes a Knox Box
SHALL be provided for FIRE DEPARTMENT rapid entry. Form can be obtained at the
Clearwater Fire and Rescue Division of Fire Prevention Services 610 Franklin St.
Clearwater, FI. 33756 Phone (727) 562-4327, Fax (727) 562-4461 ACKNOWLEDGE
PRIOR TO CDB
Acknowledged
10. All fire underground work is required to have a Class 1, 2 or 5 licensed contractor
submit plans for a separate underground fire permit. Plans must include all details
including restraint devices and additional pre-cast thrust blocks at all 45 and 90
degree turns for private fire mains in accordance with NFPA 24 ACKNOWLEDGE
PRIOR TO CDB
Acknowledged
11. Sheet 5 of site data shows the removal of the existing Backflow Preventer, how are
you planning on keeping the existing fire sprinkler system wet and meeting the
requirements of NFPA-241, 2004 edition Standard for Safeguarding Construction,
Alteration, and Demolition Operations. ACKNOWLEDGE PRIOR TO CDB
The new backflow preventer will be installed prior to removing the existing backflow
preventer. The time that the fire sprinkler sysfem will be out of service will be minimized, and
a fire watch will be coordinated with the City Fire Department.
12. Must provide Knox locking caps for the Fire Department Connection.
ACKNOWLEDGE PRIOR TO CDB
Acknowledged, see revised sheet 12
Land Resource Review
1. The tree survey and tree inventory is incomplete. Noticed that the trees around the
existing retention pond and some crepe myrtles along Drew St. are missing. Verify
that all trees are surveyed and inventory the ones adjacent to proposed construction
prior to CDB.
Missing frees have been added to the Demolition Plan and Landscape Plan
2. Revise the stormwater system to avoid the landscape islands with trees. Revise
prior to CDB
The stormwater pipe locations are based upon the existing pipes. The existing pipes musf
be removed.
3. The proposed impacts, stormwater pond and proposed parking, with its typical
cross section, may be too severe for tree #T-041. Discuss options with your arborist to
reduce these impacts prior to CDB.
Impacts have been reduced by deleting one parking space, using "F"curb (instead of"D')
and using a 4"concrete pavement(instead of asphalt, base and sub-base). See Sheet 7.
Planning Review
1. The shopping center was approved at a parking ratio of 4.32 spaces per 1,000
square feet of gross floor area in 2002. This parking ratio will need to be maintained
for the subject redevelopment of the site. If the 4.32 parking ratio cannot be upheld
then a parking demand study based upon the City's standards shall be performed
prior to the CDB. Prior to the preparation of a Parking Demand Study the architect,
civil engineer or AICP accredited professional whom is preparing the Study shall
schedule and attend a mandatory meeting with City staff from Traffic Engineering
(Engineering Department) and Planning & Development in order to establish an
approved methodology for the Study.
A Parking Demand Study has been performed showing the proposed 822 spaces at a ratio of
4.04/1,000 sf will be adequate. The 822 spaces provides a 8 space buffer over the
4.00/1,000 sf ratio. This buffer is necessary to accommodate future unforeseen condifions.
2. Based upon the Parking Demand Study finding, the City may require that the
development comply with the minimum interior landscaping requirements for parking
lots set forth in CDC Section 3-1202.E.
Three additional landscape islands have been added to improve the interior landscaping.
See Sheet 7.
3. Provide the existing Vehicle Use Area (VUA) percentage and a new VUA percentage,
if additional interior landscaping is required in the parking lot (landscaping may be
required if the parking demand study finds a parking service ratio less than 4.32 ratio),
to determine what the reduction to or increase in VUA percentage will be as set forth
in the CDC Section 3-1202.E.
See revised Sife Data table on the Cover Sheet.
4. Include on signed and sealed landscape plan any additional landscaping that will
comply with the interior landscaping standards.
Acknowledged
5. Provide a project valuation on resubmitted application form. As set forth in CDC
Section 3-1202.A and 3-1401.B, if improvements value 25 percent or more of the
valuation of the existing principal structure as reflected on the property appraisers
current records then the landscaping and parking lot shall be brought to compliance
for the entire property.
The existing value of the center is$9,400,000.00. The value of the proposed improvements
is $2,200,000.00 which is 23% of the existing value.
6. On the Site Plan show in the northwest and southwest areas where any new interior
islands and parking spaces are proposed, provide the dimensional widths of drive
aisles and parking spaces to ensure the new construction compiles with CDC Section
3-1402.
Additional dimensions have been shown as discussed at our meeting on August 9. See
Sheets 6-8.
7. If additional interior landscape islands in the parking lot are required based upon
the Parking Demand Study finding, locate the islands in areas where the number of
parking spaces in a row will be reduced to at least 15 spaces or less.
Agreed, see revise Site Plan
8. There is a Comprehensive Sign program on the subject property, any signage
requests must comply with the established standards. Any signage inconsistent with
the standards shall be reviewed separately through the Comprehensive Sign Program.
Acknowledged
Solid Waste Review Solid Waste Review
The dumpster has been turned to make it accessible
Stormwater Review The following shall be addressed prior to Community
Development Board:
It appears that the existing 30" RCP offsite runoff from the southern property is being
blocked as part of this redevelopment. Please demonstrate that this will not cause any
adverse impact to the adjacent property.
The 30"RCP from fhe south will be connected to the new 42"SD. See Sheet 9.
The following shall be addressed prior to the issuance of the Building Permit:
1. Submit 4 copies of the approved SWFWMD permit.
Acknowledged
2. The proposed ponds shall drawdown within 24 hours, not 36 hours as currently
designed.
Acknowledged, see revised stormwater ca/cs.
3. Show on the plans the SW basin that contributes to the SW pond and the NW basin
that contributes to the NW pond.
See Basin Maps in the revised stormwafer report
4. Please provide a minimum of 6" freeboard (from top of grade of control structures
to the top of bank) for the proposed ponds.
Acknowledged, see revised sheets 9 & 10.
5. Please show clearly on the plan the flow path of the existing storm sewer including
invert elevations.
Acknowledged, see revised sheets 9 & 10 and Survey.
6. Provide a detail for each of the control structures along with weir calculations and
show that the proposed storm system does not cause adverse impact to the
surrounding areas.
See Drainage Detail Sheet 13 and stormwater calcs.
7. A 20 drainage easement over the new 24" RCP along Drew Street shall be dedicated
to the City. Please call 727-562-4754 for further information on the process of
easement dedication.
Acknowledged, see sheets 10 & 11 showing the proposed drainage easement.
General note:
1. All resubmittals shall be accompanied with a response letter addressing how each
department condition has been met.
Acknowledged
2. DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may
be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application.
Acknowledged
Traffic Eng Review Prior to review by the Community Development Board:
1. All signs and pavement markings within the portions of the parking lot be
redeveloped shall meet the requirements of the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control
Devices (MUTCD).
Acknowledged, see notes on sheet 5.
2. Provide a typical dimension for regular parking spaces including the angle in
degrees. All parking spaces shall comply to current City standards per Community
Development Code Section 3-1 402 A.
The new 90 degree parking complies with City standards. The angle parking maintains the
existing parking pattern with 10'wide spaces as discussed on August 9.
3. Provide handicapped parking stall and sign details compliant with City standards.
(Part C Section 100, Index No. 118 �1 19)
http:/Iwww.myclearwater.com/gov/depts/pwa/engin/Production/stddet/index.asp
Acknowledged, to be provided during construction plan review.
4. Provide sight visibility triangles at the driveway(s) along US 19 and Drew Street per
FDOT's (Florida Department of Transportation) guidelines. (Florida Department of
Transportations 2010 Design Standards, Index 549.)
See Horizontal Control Plan sheets 6-8.
5. Provide an accessible path to and from multiple buildings on site e.g. from Babies R
Us to Best Buy, compliant with Florida Accessibility Code for Building Construction
Chapter 11, Section 11-4.3.2.
Acknowledged, fhe path currently exists from Best Buy to Babies R Us. The proposed plan
will continue this pafh to the FDOT sidewalk along US 19.
Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy:
1. Applicant shall pay the applicable Transportation Impact fee.
Acknowledged
Enclosed for your review are the requested materials. Should you have any questions or
require additional information regarding this submittal, please contact our office at (727)
789-9500 ext 122.
Sincerely,
GROUP
��
� /� \
� �
i
J
,
� Robert H. i ro,
, Senior Pr ec� M nager/Associate
,
�; Planning Department CASE#:
�� � 100 South Myrtle Avenue RECEIVED BY(staff initials):
k �� ����'�� Clearwater Florida 33756 DATE RECEIVED:
,
>� Telephone: 727-562-4567
Fax: 727-562-4865
�ij SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION
�[ SUBMIT 14 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION-Plans and
application are required to be collated,stapled,and folded into sets
�Q SUBMIT FIRE PRELIMARY SITE PLAN:$200.00
�S[ SUBMIT APPLICATION FEE$ �,2O�J.00
* NOTE:15 TOTAL SETS OF INFORMATION REQUIRED (APPLICATIONS PLUS SITE PLAN SETS)
FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION
Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project
(Revised 07/11/2008)
�PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT�
A. APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A)
APPLICANT NAME: BI'OWfI-'I 9 LLC, ATTN: Jared D. Brown
�_.___...__.� �___..---...�_.__.___._._._..._______.__-----.--__..._.......____._�_
MAILING ADDRESS: 635 COUrt St(e@t, Suite 120, Clearwater, FL 33765-5512
__._____.._-------�_.. ---..-
PHONE NUMBER: �727�443-6Q$H FAX NUMBER: �727�4O3-S7HO
CELL NUMBER �727) -403-8780 EMAi�: JDBrown@herbertgbrown.com
-- ----------------._._._...�___...._....._..._-------..__._............._....__.._.._..._..._...._._....._..___....------_----------..._._______------..._
PROPeRrY owNeR�s�: Brown-19 LLC
__ .___..__.._.._...__....._..__.._._..__.__.�_._._.....---
List ALL owners on the deed
AGENT NAME: AVICI GC'OUp, ATTN: Peter R. Pensa, AICP
MAILING ADDRESS: Q5OO CUPI@W RCI SUIt@ ZO'I Palm Harbor FL 34683 �
PHONENUMBER: (72� 7$9-9rj�0 X �8� FAXNUMBER: �727� 78t�-6662 �
--._�___.______--- — -�.�..._--..__....�____
CELLNUMBER: �27) 234-80�5 EMAIL: gtg�.pgnSB avid roup.com
B. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A) $9,4 0 0, 0 0 o exi st
PROJECTNAME: Df@W "I9 SllOpplflg C@ilt@I' PROJECTVALUATION: $ $2�200, 000 propos
______
srREET A�oRESS 21311_ US Hi�hway 9 9 N_�SEC of Drew St& US-19)
__ . _. . _....
PARCE�NUMBER(S): �7 29-�6-0�0��-220-��0�
PARCEL SIZE(acres): �6.985 T PARCEL SIZE(square feet): 739�$']2
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: S@@ SUN@
_...___..___.._._...__.Y_....._....................._...._..._........__ .__._.
PROPOSE�usE�s>: Retail/Sho��n� Center �
17,200 sq ft. commercial addition and interior remodel to address changing needs of
DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST: tg�antS. Ke uestin deviations for:front US-19 setback reduction from 25'to 10-15'
Specificatly identify the request bU er wi S 8S BpIC�� ; ron - rew U@I'pavemen �8 UC 1011S f'OI11
(include number of units or square t9-8p p��'0�-3:5'-3�-5'- e��idt#-as-depi�ted;-si�e�s�ut#}-b�1#eN��/err�e�t-Fed�c�ioFl-#rom
footage of non-residential use and all 10'to a rox. 0'-5' buffer width as de icted; vehicular use area/interior landscape island
requested code deviations;e.9. re UC 1011S �0111 0, sq. a every aces o main ammg 2 eXIS Iflg
reduction in required number of nanconfocrx�ing-islaads-thcoughou�-ttae-site-and-tostdpe-additi duA
parking spaces,specific use,ecc.� behind Best Buy as depicted; and to provide a parking ratio of 4.�1 sp ces�y pe er�1,00 sq.ft..
C:\Documents and Settings\derek.fergusonlDesktop\planning dept forms 07081Comprehensive Infill Project(FLD)2008 07-11.doc
Page 1 of 8
DOES THIS APPLICATION INVOLVE THE TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS (TDR), A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED PLANNED UNI
DEVELOPMENT,OR A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED(CERTIFIED)SITE PLAN? YES_ NO� (if yes,attach a copy of the applicable documents)
C. PROOF OF OWNERSHIP: (Code Section 4-202.A.5)
�S( SUBMIT A COPY OF THE TITLE INSURANCE POLICY, DEED TO THE PROPERTY OR SIGN AFFIDAVIT ATTESTING OWNERSHIP (see
page 7)
D. WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 3-913.A)
� Provide complete responses to the six(6)GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA—Explain how each criteria is achieved,in detail:
1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale,bulk,coverage,density and character of adjacent properties in which it
is located.
The existin sho in center alread exists in harmon with the ad'acent ro e�ties.All four corners of the US-19 and Drew
ree m ersec ion are commercia y eve ope an e si e a u s o ig , ensi resi en ia apa men comp exe�f�-
to the south and east.The buildin s were constructed for retail occu anc in 197 and there have been several additions and
remo e s smce t en to accommo ate c angmg retai mar et nee s wi m e commurn e propose a ition wi aa itate
retainin and co-locatin Babies"R"Us/To s"R"Us within the sho in center.Babies" "Us is currentl located in the end
unit abu ing US-19. —
2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly
impair the value thereof.
The proposed addition will positively impact the surrounding area,property values,and local economy.The adjacent apartment
complexes and their residents benefit from the existing shopping center's 100%occupancy rate and the mix of products and
services that its existing and proposed retail tenants provide.
3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use.
The proposed addition onto an existing retail shopping center development will not adversely affect health or safety.
4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion.
The developmenYs access points will not chan e,exce t that the southernmost drivewa on the US-19 frontaqe road will be
c� ange� rom a o-wa�y service ve ic�e an �secon ary cus omer access in o a one-way in ound�e ict-I very vel�ic e a� ccess
for Babies"R"Us/Toys°R"Us and the other tenants located along the southern boundary. he primary cusfomer access from
IIS- ron age roa wi con mue o e�e��us no o e exis ing propose s ore ron s. o c anges are propose
along Drew Street.
5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development.
The existing development is already consistent with the area's community character.The proposed building addition will
complement the existing structures located on the property as depicted in the architectural renderings.Additional landscape
plantings are also proposed as shown on the landscape plan.
6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual,acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts,on
adjacent properties.
The Babies"R"Us/Toys"R"Us delive ��k wells have been tlesigned to minimize potential adverse effects on adjacent
properties and there will be no outdoor storage of materials.The service area is located below existing grade on the abutting
property, plus the apartment complex recently constructed a new six-foot high masonry screening wall along the common
property line. ----- ----------- - -
C:\Documents and Settings\derek.ferguson\Desktop\planning dept forms 0708\Comprehensive Infill Project(FLD)2008 07-11.doc
Page 2 of 8
WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Comprehensive In�ll Redevelopment Project Criteria)
�Q Provide complete responses to the six(6)COMPREHENSIVE INFILL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT CRITERIA—Explain how each criteria is
achieved,in detail:
1. The development or redevelopment is otherwise impractical without deviations from the use and/or development standards set forth in this
zoning district.
Given the form function and a e of the sho in center it is im ractical to res ond to chan in market conditions without
some a owance or crea vi an evia ions in e re eve opmen pro�cess. e propose si e an an scaping ans s ow e
applicauts.antent_to_balar�ce-ihe-teaaats'buiJdipg_arearparkin raad�isibilit�aeedswitk�the�it�'�cuuentsetbac�packin�and-
landscaping development standards in order to create a cost�easible retlevelopment project that will enhance the shopping
ee�#er�a�peaFa�ee-afld-fdr�etiar�ali#y. —
2. The development or redevelopment will be consistent with the goals and policies ot the Comprehensive Plan, as well as with the general
purpose,intent and basic planning objectives of this Code,and with the intent and purpose of this zoning district
Continued use of the property as a shopping center is consistent with the general purpose and intent of the code and the
goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan regarding locational appropriateness,community aesthetics,and utilization of
innovative and flexible planning and engineering to promote redevelopment and compact infill development.
3. The development or redevelopment will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of surrounding properties.
The proposed redevelopment activiry will not impede normal and orderly development and improvement of the surrounding_
properties which are already develo eP d• ____ _
4. Adjoining properties will not suffer substantial detriment as a result of the proposed development.
The proposed redevelopment activiry will not create a detriment upon adjoininq properties.The buildinq addition and parkinq/
landscaping modifications will enhance the site's appearance.
5. The proposed use shall otherwise be permitted by the underlying future land use category, be compatible with adjacent land uses, will not
substantially alter the essential use characteristics of the neighborhood; and shall demonstrate compliance with one or more of the following
objectives:
a. The proposed use is permitted in this zoning district as a minimum standard,flexible standard or flexible development use;
b. The proposed use would be a significant economic contributor to the City's economic base by diversifying the local economy or by creating
jobs;
c. The development proposal accommodates the expansion or redevelopment of an existing economic contributor;
d. The proposed use provides for the provision of affordable housing;
e. The proposed use provides for development or redevelopment in an area that is characterized by other similar development and where a
land use plan amendment and rezoning would result in a spot land use or zoning designation;or
f. The proposed use provides for the development of a new and/or preservation of a working waterfront use.
"Retail Sales and Services"use is permitted as both a standard and flexible development use within the"C"(Commercial)
zoning district and"CG"(Commercial General)future land use category.
6. Flexibility with regard to use,lot width,required setbacks,height and off-street parking are justified based on demonstrated compliance with all of
the following design objectives:
a. The proposed development will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of the surrounding properties for uses
permitted in this zoning district;
b. The proposed development complies with applicable design guidelines adopted by the City;
c. The design,scale and intensity of the proposed development supports the established or emerging character of an area;
d. In order to form a cohesive,visually interesting and attractive appearance,the proposed development incorporates a substantial number of
the following design elements:
❑ Changes in horizontal building planes;
❑ Use of architectural details such as columns,cornices,stringcourses,pilasters,porticos,balconies,railings,awnings,etc.;
❑ Variety in materials,colors and textures;
❑ Distinctive fenestration patterns;
❑ Building stepbacks;and
❑ Distinctive roofs forms.
e. The proposed development provides for appropriate buffers,enhanced landscape design and appropriate distances between buildings.
The redevelopment plans demonstrate compliance with all five of these design objectives.
C:\Documents and Settings\derek.ferguson\Desktop\planning dept forms 0708\Comprehensive Infill Project(FLD)2008 07-11.doc
Page 3 of 8
E. STORMWATER PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteria
Manual and 4-202.A.21)
jiQ A STORMWATER NARRATIVE MUST BE SUBMITTED WITH ALL APPLICATIONS.All applications that involve addition
or modification of impervious surface, including buildings, must include a stormwater plan that demonstrates compliance with the City of
Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteria manual.A reduction in impervious surface area does not qualify as an exemption to this requirement.
�Y( If a plan is not required,the narrative shail provide an explanation as to why the site is exempt.
�7( At a minimum,the STORMWATER PLAN shall include the following;
]tQ Existing topography extending 50 feet beyond all property lines;
]8( Proposed grading including finished floor elevations of all structures;
�( All adjacent streets and municipal storm systems;
�S( Proposed stormwater detention/retention area including top of bank,toe of slope and outlet control structure;
}f� A narrative describing the proposed stormwater control plan including all calculations and data necessary to demonstrate compliance with
the City manual.
� Proposed stormwater detention/retention area including top of bank,toe of slope and outlet control structure;
�Q Signature and seal of Florida Registered Professional Engineer on all plans and calculations.
kQ COPY OF PERMIT INQUIRY LETTER OR SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT (SWFWMD) PERMIT
SUBMITTAL(SWFWMD approval is required prior to issuance of City Building Permit),if applicable
� WLEDGEMENT OF STORMWATER PLAN REQUIREMENTS(Applicant must initial one of the following):
Stormwater plan as noted above is included
/ Stormwater plan is not required and explanation narrative is attached. At a minimum, a grading plan and finished floor
C I elevations shall be provided.
CAUTION — IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A STORMWATER PLAN
AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED,APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY
MAY OCCUR.
If you have questions regarding these requirements,contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at(727)562-4750.
F. SUPPLEMENTAL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 4-202.A)
�8( SIGNED AND SEALED SURVEY(including legal description of property)—One original and 14 copies;
� TREE SURVEY (including existing trees on site and within 25'of the adjacent site, by species, size (DBH 4"or greater), and location,
including drip lines and indicating trees to be removed)—please design around the existing trees;
]� TREE INVENTORY; prepared by a"certified arborist", of all trees 4" DBH or greater, reflecting size, canopy(drip lines)and condition of
such trees;
� LOCATION MAP OF THE PROPERTY;
�( PARKING DEMAND STUDY in conjunction with a request to make deviations to the parking standards (ie. Reduce number of spaces).
Prior to the submittal of this application,the methodology of such study shall be approved by the Community Development Coordinator and
shall be in accordance with accepted traffic engineering principles. The findings of the study will be used in determining whether or not
deviations to the parking standards are approved;
�[ GRADING PLAN,as applicable;
N/A 0 PRELIMINARY PLAT,as required(Note: Building permits will not be issued until evidence of recording a final plat is provided);
N/A � COPY OF RECORDED PLAT,as applicable;
C:\Documents and Settings\derek.ferguson\Desktop\planning dept forms 0708\Comprehensive Infill Project(FLD)2008 07-11.doc
Page 4 of 8
G. SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A)
� SITE PLAN with the following information(not to exceed 24"x 36"):
X Index sheet referencing individual sheets included in package;
X North arrow;
X Engineering bar scale(minimum scale one inch equals 50 feet),and date prepared;
X All dimensions;
X Footprint and size of all EXISTING buildings and structures;
�( Footprint and size of all PROPOSED buildings and structures;
�( All required setbacks;
X All existing and proposed points of access;
X All required sight triangles;
Identification of environmentally unique areas, such as watercourses, wetlands, tree masses, and specimen trees, including
X description and location of understory,ground cover vegetation and wildlife habitats,etc;Location of all public and private easements;
�( Location of all street rights-of-way within and adjacent to the site;
Location of existing public and private utilities, including fire hydrants, storm and sanitary sewer lines, manholes and lift stations,gas
X and water lines;
X All parking spaces,driveways,loading areas and vehicular use areas;
X Depiction by shading or crosshatching of all required parking lot interior landscaped areas;
X Location of all solid waste containers, recycling or trash handling areas and outside mechanical equipment and all required screening
_ {per Section 3-201(D)(i)and Index#701};
�( Location of all landscape material;
X Location of ail onsite and offsite storm-water management facilities;
�( Location of all outdoor lighting fixtures;
�( Location of all existing and proposed sidewalks;and
Floor plan typicals of buildings for all Level Two approvals. A floor plan of each floor is required for any parking garage requiring a
X Level Two approval.
� SITE DATA TABLE for existing,required,and proposed development,in written/tabular form:
EXISTING REQUIRED PROPOSED
X Land area in square feet and acres;
X Number of EXISTING dwelling units;
X Number of PROPOSED dwelling units;
X Gross floor area devoted to each use;
XParking spaces: total number, presented in tabular form with the
number of required spaces;
Total paved area, including all paved parking spaces&driveways,
X expressed in square feet&percentage of the paved vehicular area;
Official records book and page numbers of all existing utility
X easement;
X Building and structure heights;
X Impermeable surface ratio(I.S.R.);and
� Floor area ratio(F.A.R.)for all nonresidential uses.
� REDUCED COLOR SITE PIAN to scale(8 Yz X 11);
� FOR DEVELOPMENTS OVER ONE ACRE,provide the following additional i�formation on site plan:
X One-foot contours or spot elevations on site;
X Offsite elevations if required to evaluate the proposed stormwater management for the parcel;
X All open space areas;
X Location of all earth or water retaining walls and earth berms;
X Lot lines and building lines(dimensioned);
�( Streets and drives(dimensioned);
�( Building and structural setbacks(dimensioned);
X Structural overhangs;
C:\Documents and Settings\derek.ferguson\Desktop�pianning dept forms 0708\Comprehensive Infill Project(FLD)2008 07-11.doc
Page 5 of 8
H. LANDSCAPING PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-1102.A)
� LANDSCAPE PLAN with the following information(not to exceed 24"x 36"):
X All existing and proposed structures;
X Names of abutting streets;
X Drainage and retention areas including swales,side slopes and bottom elevations;
X Delineation and dimensions of all required perimeter landscape buffers;
)( Sight visibility triangies;
�( Delineation and dimensions of all parking areas including landscaping islands and curbing;
Existing trees on-site and immediately adjacent to the site,by species,size and locations,including driplines(as indicated on required
X tree survey);
Location, size, and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, indicated by a key relating to the plant
X schedule;
Plant schedule with a key(symbol or label)indicating the size,description,specifications,quantities,and spacing requirements of all
X existing and proposed landscape materials,including botanical and common names;
Typical planting details for trees, palms, shrubs and ground cover plants including instructions, soil mixes, backfilling, mulching and
X protective measures;
Interior landscaping areas hatched and/or shaded and labeled and interior landscape coverage, expressing in both square feet and
)( percentage covered;
X Conditions of a previous development approval(e.g.conditions imposed by the Community Development Board);
�( Irrigation notes.
�) REDUCED COLOR LANDSCAPE PLAN to scale(S Y�X 11);
�(► COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM application, as applicable. Landscape associated with the Comprehensive Landscape
Program shall exceed minimum Code requirements to offset the areas where minimum Code will not be met.
I. BUILDING ELEVATION PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A.23)
� BUILDING ELEVATION DRAWINGS—with the following information:
X All sides of all buiidings
X Dimensioned
�( Colors(provide one full sized set of colored elevations)
�( Materials
$�j REDUCED BUILDING ELEVATIONS—same as above to scale on 8'/2 X 11
J. SIGNAGE: (Division 19.SIGNS/Section 3-1806)
�1 All EXISTING freestanding and attached signs; Provide photographs and dimensions (area, height, etc.), indicate whether they will be
removed or to remain.
$� All PROPOSED freestanding and attached signs; Provide details including location, size, height, colors, materials and drawing;
freestanding signs shall include the street address(numerals)
,�) Comprehensive Sign Program application,as applicable(separate application and fee required).
� Reduced signage proposal(8 Y�X 11) (color),if submitting Comprehensive Sign Program application.
C:\Documents and Settings\derek.ferguson\Desktop\planning dept forms 0708\Comprehensive Infill Project(FLD)2008 07-11.doc
Page 6 of 8
K. TRAFFIC IMPAC7 STUDY: (Section 4202.A.13 and 4-801.C)
❑ Include if required by the Tiaffic Operetions Manager or his/her designee or if the proposed development:
N/A
• Will degrade ihe acceptable level of service for any roadway as adopted in the Comprehensive Alan.
• Wiil generate 10D or more new vehicle direclional trips per hour andlor 1000 or more new vehicfe trips per day.
• Will affect a nearby roadway segmenk and/or interseclion with five(5)reportable accidents wilhin the prior twelve(12)month period or
that is on the City's annual list of most hazardous intersections.
Trip generation shali be based on the most recenl edition of the Inslilute of Transportation Engineer s(1TE)Trip General Manual.
The Traffic Impaci 5tudy must be prepared in accordance with a "Scoping Meeting" held with the Traftic Operations Manager and 1he
Planning Depariment's Development Review Manager or their designee(727-562-4750}
Refer to Section 4-801 C of lhe Community Development Code tor exceptions to this requirement.
�4( Acknowledgement of trafiic impact study requirements{Applicant must iniGai one of the following}:
Traffic Impact Study is included.The study must incfude a summary table of pre-and post-development levels of seryice for all
raadway legs and each turning movement at all intersections identified in the Scoping Meeling.
X /�� Traific Impact Study is not required.
CAUTION — IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS 1N THE REQUIREMENT FOR A 7RAFFIC IMPAC7
STUDY AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICAT[ON MUST BE RESUBMlTTED AND
SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR.
If you have questions regarding lhese requirements, contact the City Publlc Works AdministreGon Engineering Department at{727)562-
4750.
L. FIRE FI.OW CALCUI..AT10NS1 WATER STUDY:
Provide Fire Flow Calculations.Water Study by a F1t2E PROTECTION ENGINEER to assure an adequate water supply!s available and to determine if
any upgredes are required by the developer due lo the impaat ot thEs projec�t. The water supply must be abls to support lhe needs of any required fire
sprinkler,standpipe andlor fire pump. If a fire pump fs requlred the water supply must be able to supply 150°�of its rated capacity. Compliance wilh
khe 2004 Florida Rre Prevenlion Code to include NFPA 13,MFPA 14,NFPA 20,NFPA 291,and MFPA 1142(Annex H)is required.
�( Acknowiedgement of fire flow calculations/water study requirements(Applicant must initial one of the following):
X� Fire Flow CalculallonslWater Study is lncluded.
Fire Flow CalculationslWater Study fs not required.
CAUTION — !F APPLiCATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A FIRE FLOW
CALCULA7tONS/ WATER STUDY AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE
RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR.
If you have questions regarding these requirements,contact the City Fire Prevention Department at(727)562-4334.
M. SIGNATURE:
I,the undersigned,acknowisdge tfiat all representations made STATE OF FLORIDA,COUNTY OF PINEJ.LAS
in thls appllcatfon are true and accurate to the best of my S om to and subscribed before me this����,,,day of
knowledge and suthorize City representatives to vlsit and ,A.D,_20--1-�"—to•me andlor hy
photograph the properiy described in this application. _ ' ;who is personally�4c�own has
produced _ �
� as identification. ,�
X , � r-- j. � �
Signature oF r wner o representative . �f
/Nota public, ^���
� MY'G9 mission expires:
,K+r+�r:�,,�+�,e'��+'�/�✓..
Jy��ry�ublic State ol Florida
C:1Documents and Settingslderek.fergusonlDesktop\pla�:ning dept forms 07081Comprehensive Infill Project L�l�'F'�,U7Blr ntr Satrenek
Page 7 of 8 : �y r'amm�ssion QD749031 j
� � �.m�es0311012D12 S
�or N° 1
N. AFFlDAVIT TO AUTNORIZE AGENT:
1. Provide names of a!I property owners on deed-PRINT full names:
Brown-19 LLC
2. That{I am/we are)the owner(s)and record title holder(s)of the foilowing described property(address or generaf location):
Drew 19 Shopping Center, located at 2131'i US Highway 19 N (SEC of Drew St& US-19),
Parcel ID no. 17-29-1fi-Q0000-22D-0100
3. Thai this property consGlutes ihe property for which a request for a:(describe request)
Permittin of a commercial buildin addition and associated site im rovements, including applications_
o�r F exi6 e eve opmen ompre ensive Tnfiill-Re ev�etopmenf ro�ec , ompre��ve an scape
Proaram,..and�.theLaRpli�ations as may_b.�_n��de�d.
4. That the undersigned(haslhave)appoinied and(does/do}appoint:
Robert H. Pierro, P.E. and/or Peter R. Pensa, A1CP of Avid Group
as(hisltheir)agent{s)ta execute any petiGons or other documents necessary lo aNect such petition;
5. That this a�davit has been executed lo induce the Clty of Clearvvaler,Florida lo consider and act on ihe above described property;
6. Thal site vlsils to the property are necessary by Cily representatives in order to process Ihis appllcalion and the owner authorizes City
represenlatives to 'sita pholograph the property described in this appticallon;
7. Th�f• !we},!he u ersi ne uthorit her b�certify that Ihe fore ng' true and correct.
� p � ner L Property Owner
� - l�!� -�-
Pro rty'�wner Property Owner
STATE OF FL,ORIDA,
/ COUNTY OF PINELLAS
Before me the undersigned,an offcer duly commissloned by the laws ot the State of Flnrida,on thls � � day of
�^
�Q_�} , �O/ personally appeared .,z�(�f�� ]� r-o r,J� who having been first duly swom
Depose�and says that he/she fully understands lhe contents of the aHidavit Ihal helshe signetl.
.c�JNIFER daHERTY
�`�*�� AAY COMid15SI0N#U4884D20
t � D(PIRES:JUL 01,2013
a*� Donded Uuouph 7st 51ate Insurance
Notary Public Slg�rald
Notary Seal/Stamp My Commission Expires: 7�' � —�
C:1Documents and Sellingslderek.fergusonlDeskloplplanning dept fortns 07081Comprehensive Infill ProJecl(FlD)2008 07-11.doc
Page 8 0(B
s�,,��, CITY OF CLEARWATER
,��� � AFFIDAVIT TO AUTHORIZE AGENT
9�- o� PLANNING &DEVELOPMENT SERVICES ADMINISTRATION
9h'�4TfN.��' tviUMC]PAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 S011TH MYRTLE AVENUE, 2'�FLOOR
PHONE(?27)-562-A567 FAX(727) 562-4576
Brown-19 LLC
(Name o(all properly owners)
1. That(I am/we are)the owner(s)and record title holder(s)of the following described property:
Drew 19 Shopping Center, located at 21311 US Highway 19 N (SEC of Drew St 8� US-19),
Parcel ID no. 17-29-16-00000-220-0100
{Add�ess or General Locallon)
2. That this property constitutes the property for which a request for a:
Permitting of a commercial building addition and associated site improvements, including
applications for Flexible Development{Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project),
Comprehensive Landscape Program, and other applications as may be needed.
(Nature of requesi)
3. That the undersigned{has/ttave)appointed and{does/do}appoint Robert H. Pierro, P.E. and/or
Peter R. Pensa, AICP of Avid Group
as(hisJlheir)agent{s)to rxecute any petitions or other documents necessary lo affect such petition;
4. That this affidavit has been executed to induce the City of Clearwater, Florida to consider and act
on the above described property;
5. That(I/we),the undersigned authority, hereby certify tha th for oi '�e� d coRect.
-'i ��- - ���--�
P% r� �J���1 !�'�N
P�roperty Ow�er /v���.��
STATE OF FLORIQA, //�
COUNTY OF PINELLAS
Before me 1he undersigned,an officer duly commissioned by the la of the 5tale of Florida,on thls � day of
,� 1 l personallyappeared �(�C'� _� �r"'�t..)Y? who having been firstduly swom
dep and says that he/she fully understands lhe contents of the a�idavit that he/she signed.
JENNIFER OONEA7Y
_��''�"'ti,. MY COMMISSION#DQ884Q2D
My Commission Expires:
�,�� EXPIRES:JUL 01,2d13 No ry Publlc
BarMad lhrouyh 1s1 State Insurance
S:applkalion fortnsldevelopmenl review/Affidavit lo Auihorize Agent
Planning& Development CASE NUMBER:
Department RECEIVED BY(Staff Initials):
° Clearwater 100 South Myrtle Avenue
> Clearwater, Florida 33756 DATE RECEIVED:
- Telephone: 727-562-4567
� Fax: 727-562-4865
� SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION
�( SUBMIT 14 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION-Plans and
application are required to be collated,stapled and folded into sets
* NOTE: A TOTAL OF 15 SETS OF THIS APPLICATION AND ALL SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION IS REQUIRED TO BE SUBMITTED IN
CONJUNCTION WITH A COMPLETE LEVEL ONE OR LEVEL TWO APPLICATION.
COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM
(Revised 11/29/2010)
�PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT�
APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A)
APPLICANT NAME: BCOWtI-'I 9 LLC, ATTN: Jared D. Brown
MAILING ADDRESS: 635 COUPt Stf@2t, Suite 120, Clearwater, FL 33765-5512
PHONE NUMBER: �727�443-G488 CELL NUMBER: �7Z7�4O3-S78O
E-nna,i�A��RESS: JDBrown@herbertgbrown.com
PROPERTY OWNER(S): BfOWII-"I 9 LLC
List ALL owners on the deed
AGENT NAME: AVICI GfOUp, ATTN: Peter R. Pensa, AICP
MAILINGADDRESS: 9500 CUfI@W Rd, Suite 201, Palm Harbor, FL 34683
PHONE NUMBER: (7Z7� 7H9-95O0 X "I H'I Fax NuMeER: 727 784-6662
CELL NUMBER: (7ZT�Z34-HO�rJ E-MAIL ADDRESS: peter.penSa CI aVId9f0Up.COf11
The landscaping requirements of Article 3, Division 12, may be modified or waived as part of a Level One(Flexible Standard)or Level Two
(Flexible Developmentj application,as the case may be, if the application for development approval includes a Comprehensive Landscape
Program, which satisfies the following criteria. The use of landscape plans, sections/elevations, renderings and perspectives may be
necessary to supplement the information provided on this worksheet.Landscaping associated with the Comprehensive Landscape Program
shall exceed minimum Code requirements to offset the areas where minimum Code will not be met.
1. ARCHITECTURAL THEME:
a. The landscaping in a Comprehensive Landscape Program shall be designed as a part of the architecturat theme of the principal buildings
proposed or developed on the parcel proposed for the development.
The landscape program incorporates the architectural theme of the shopping center's existing/proposed buildings. In order for
the redevelopment project to be feasible,the comprehensive landscape program had to complement the architecture and sitel
landscaping layout while continuing to meet the needs of existing tenants.The landscape design is impacted by physical
conditions which include overhead and underground utilities,parking and traffic circulation, provision of additional stormwater
oR (continued below)
b. The design, character, location and/or materials of the landscape treatment proposed in the Comprehensive Landscape Program shall be
demonstrably more attractive than landscaping otherwise permitted on the parcel proposed for development under the minimum landscape
standards.
capacity, previous right-of-way taking,and limited tenant visibility due to construction of the US-19 frontage road and overpass.
As depicted on the site and landscape plans,the project construction limits comprise those areas immediately surrounding the
Toys"R"Us building adtlition at the southwest comer of the property,the new parking and stormwater pond along Drew Street,
expansion of the existing stormwater pond next to Guitar Center,and pavement restriping for employee parking behind the
Best Buy/Rooms to Go building.The landscape program focuses primary on the US-19 and Drew Street frontages.
Page 1 of 2
2. LIGHTING:
Any lighting proposed as a part of a comprehensive landscape program is automatically controlled so that the lighting is turned off when the
business is closed.
Site lighting for the existing shopping center is already on a programmable timer system. Lighting that is not needed to maintain
public safety/security is turned off when the center is not in operation.
3. COMMUNIN CHARACTER:
The landscape treatment proposed in the Comprehensive Landscape Program will enhance the community character of the City of Clearwater.
The existing development is already consistent with the community character. Redevelopment will relocate the Babies"R"Us loading
tlock and some remote parking along the US-19 frontage and replace them with the new Toys"R"Us building addition.This allows
for improved architectural and landscaping treatment along that portion of the US-19 frontage,as well as foundation piantings along
the new storefront.Existing landscaping and tree canopy will be preserved were feasible elsewhere with the development.
4. PROPERTY VALUES:
The landscape treatment proposed in the Comprehensive Landscape Program will have a beneficial impact on the value of the property in the
immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development.
The proposed landscape treatments will complement and enhance the aesthetics of the property,while allowing redevelopment
to address changing market conditions.Therefore,the improvements will have a beneficial impact on the value of the subject
property and those in the immediate vicinity.
5. SPECIAL AREA OR SCENIC CORRIDOR PLAN:
The landscape treatment proposed in the Comprehensive Landscape Program is consistent with any special area or scenic corridor plan which
the City of Clearwater has prepared and adopted for the area in which the parcel proposed for development is located.
N/A-LDC Sec.3-1203 identifies US-19 as as a primary corridor and Drew Street as a secondary corridor but,as of the date of
this application,the city has not adopted a scenic corridor plan for the area.
SIGNATURE:
I,the undersigned,acknowledge that all representations made in STATE OF FLORIDA,COUNTY OF PINELLAS
this application are true and accurate to the best of my Sworn to and subscribed before me this day of
knowledge and authorize City representatives to visit and , A.D. 20 to me and/or by
photograph the property described in this application. , who is personally known has
produced
as identification.
Signature of� wner o representative Notary public,
My commission expires:
C:IDocuments and Settingslderek.fergusonlLocal SettingslTemporary Intemef FileslContent.0utlooklKPMVX8F11Comprehensive Landscape Program
11 2010.docx
Page 2 of 2
. . . . . .. . . .. . _ :r; ::�' - . .. . -
��� -. �. .:'� � .. ��� ....... ..'—'__..._...�... ...... .... _. -
d -- ... .:. ......._......:_.__.._.: _ . ; . . .
� • . INST * 99-032303
. FEB 2, 1999 5:50PM
�
• PINELLFlS COUNTY FLR. �
• . ' � ' OFF.REC.6K 10391 PG 2235� i
_ . + �
: �,.,; , r . ..•�� ._' . •• '` ,
: ' ' � ,' . , • 5Ci14375 PAD OP-0�-1999 17:15c56 _== ` �, � .
O1 DED-9AOYH-19� LLC 1 124.00 -
RfCQRDING - � � '.�.� ;
; OOC 5TB11P-DR219 3 16�872.60 ,'.-, � ,
� TOiAI: f6�896.6Q',, , �
I CHFCK AlfT.TEHflERED: fb,E9b.64��•,,','�
� CIUiNGE: .-i:OD �
I �' -
I �'1''+ ```�,`',```� '
� -1 �v STATUTQRY WARRANTY DEED _ �,`., � ,
� � n ;_�, , � '
�� THIS INDENTURE, is made� effeciive as of the 15th da"q of Jarau�ry,"9999, .
� � �� between HERB�F2T G. BROWN ( Grantor), whose post o�ce�ddress;is 121 Narth
� Osceola Avenue, Clean�rater, FL 33755, and BROWN-19, LLC,a�Floiidailmited liability •
'� �W�� company,d/b/a Drew 19 Shopping Center{"Grantee"),whose post offiee address is c/o
i ���� Lee E.Arnold, 121 North Osceola Avenue,Clearwat�r,.FL 33765. ,
��� ,
d]W�'�l i��
���� w�-r N�s s�,��y� � ;�.,-;-' : ,
W r , � -�.��-.'.,�
ai ti�: �
�-�ay Grantor, for and in consideration oY Ten Y�olCars j$1U.00j and other good and
� s��a valuable consideration to Grantor in haPd,�aid,by,�rantee, the receipf and sufficiency .
��:�:—
�;� oF which are hereby acknowledged,-�ias-granted;,�rgained and sold to Grantee, and :
I � y^ Grantee's heirs, successors and a�signs for�v�r;#he following described land, situated �
' � � o°' in Pinellas County, Florida: ', � ;; �.:
'� `\, � . .
See Exhibit;'�,+-"'attached hereto and made a part hereof.
�� , , ,.� , ,� .
; St1BJEf��to,lfia�ters shown on Exhibit "B" attached hereto
� �� and xFjade�,par!hereof. �
:� �
;
� a �,-�HlS�t:S NOTTHE HOMESTEAD pF GRANTOR. �
�� Gra�Cor does�h�reby fully warrant the title to said land and will defend the same �
� agair�st.th�I�wful�Fa�ms of al!persons whomsoever.
1 _- •
� � ;`_;-�F�e';,�.tax parcel number for the aforedescribed ptoperty is
;�,17��9%1b7069fl0/220/0900. The tax identification number for the Grantee is
ti
, .,r j .: . .
� �'� '�"•,��',' .�°ld �
. � . �����
:� ,
� -:;`(� /�g�a• Gn
� . .i _._.-- aame�+.ary ia:<pd.=1Lr.—.--�-----
' �c- ,___ I:1•�.'.. ��c?d
, ... ,.�. ?'.�---��,�(. V .... .�'{'e:n}; ':
'' ' .� 1(:ll L s•n � �f�"+�_
�,.0 _.__,—..._ •,�L � .._- � t:, . .
�:L'�� ��._� I�1 _..-. .' fJ
•i:,i:�,�����`L�D '
.�
�
{ • . - . �4 It' ..��.
--� �i:�.�� � �\
� � . . ,�•��,'`���A�' . i w ; n �
S
t.� l� �+! _ 4 �N 1 1
���� " �
' . . �} 3� �-t.�•• , �l.l . .
. ' �r F/F. . .
� . ���::Yi .. � ' . . . .. .. .
• ... � .an. - . �i�ti�r r- . .._ _ �} �x• . ' 1 �
. . . �:�J:�1:rr��r�T'�7"r��f�'r�.�i5'7 ei.Y� i r. ��i.��. s� t� i � .. � .. . .
. . . � .'ar�14:=?�.���".�.�.r`•��!A���r4yl:i ti ra�5�� � tlC�f 4� _ . . .
. . ':1 .f ;4YC�,s W5l���♦�NY�Jn�'r'I���i�:��`Z�;�1 �. . _. . • . .
. .. ..r._.._ ..I.......�..� ,.�.L�►.:Ll�L'�.:.�:9:i.•I•Sitili'����Ws�-:���.i..�.........-..�... �.. _.............. �. . .. . ,
1 �• •
� •
' • � .
• �
f'..
' P I NELLRS COUNTY FI.R,��� "
� OFF.REC.BK 10391 PG 223�', E
: . . � ,
� �
I - '' ' .
� ItJ WITNESS WHEREOF, Grantor has hereunto set Grantor's hand and seal,tlfe�-, - ,;.� • , .
day and year first ab�ve written. �; ; • ; ,
Signed,sealed and delivered .
in the presence of: ' ' � � -•
, �,��'�,�,
, � ,
� , � :.
, , � �:��.
�, � i _- _ � , ;:;_.;
v.. • , ' - ::�,
nature iierbert G. �r n ���`
, � � �
, � , �;�:� . .
J0817 M.VeCChinn _ �•' +,:•"��:
Print name � '�
I�.N.'
�' �> -
Signature �,�` � � ^'1;' .
�
� \ � �i�
> > �
� �� �� " +
Shirlan S.Whitener � � , : �'�
, � <•;.,.';`
Print name - ' � �
, �_:��:':':
;; ��,,
,' '•
, ,' , y t;r:
� � ��� '
� � � � '•':'•
STATE OF�LORIAA ) � � ' ' ' '-•`-�"
. � , °t.•:;...
-- ;:; _
COUNTYaF�iNELLAS,r;•'� � �
� . ,' �'.'>
The foregoin�',iristrume,�t was acknowledged before me this /� ay af
,.1989,,by H��t�ERT G. BROVUN, who [is personally knawn to me]
[ _ �de�+#teatimt}: f;��,
,- , �.. �.
,- � .
�'� `�� ., �, �.
, '� , .
t , , I �.
� , , , .
� ' ' Notary Public �
� �- -' Print name Shirlan S.Whitener �
, - -_ ---'�, My commission expires:
. ,� __
,�.
``bJ)08l9409�5 AM d-3
� 35�50:�4253
�'.�""""• Sh61ao S Wi�Aener
0170p25.02 �A•• �h bsyCOMM15510N/CU40b06 DfPIRES
`_ �as,`'�� Fabruary T3,TOOP
f� BOl0F01l14UIIIOYf/WlIIKU➢NiCEAIC
1
� �
a
1
�
:+ 2
.�
a (;� � '"' '�TR!:a 5 .�:a;u:� '•iir .i::i•n`.`•,';: .
e� -� - .+��• ' u.�i .- t tY?'"�� � � :
' P - ... �� �;J .� Y' �� t�L.t� � .
r . •-,::.., ,�i�, .. <i9
. t i a�r '�S al� , .
� ti=N ,�/ � ia1, rSe.�jC� t�r .�u �� i n,�.'' � . . i
1 a+.ir�= �'�'+� ��� •so-•: . . . .
!�� 1� d r� � .� +'j t r
[r ' .��;�ci���'�rr/�d "",�..xn . • '' � .rrp�`��r: � r.� ��
5 n.w ,:r ��r r � .
; �• , . . , • , . ... J;:.ii-��:.rf�,�,��' .. . �• . t, .•1����� . . - .. . .
. . . .. ..... ��• .�� •, �i1r3.r ' . ..
;�� �;�.-•,�.,�;•«�..���,., .,. l ��
, .��iil�+�+��?j��rS�iY�;rt`�n�„�L�.s� � S �� � .. . . , �
� �t�.1: i x��i �`'. r U.l�4� •'�" .r ; i. � . ' . . .. ,
� "� .�-•� � !/�� `r� . f` � . . � .
..-._ .._ .. ..�."'�� u�.u.� .� ...L�.. .�......»........... _ .... . -- . _ ..
� ' �'
• • �
. ' �.
. �'.
PIN£LLRS COUNTY FLR. �
E`
OFF.REC,BK 10391 PG 2237;, ��
� � � �
� ,
.j __ � , �;
i An undivided 1/3 interest in and to the following described pareel:. ��� � 11 � •
���� , � ,'.� �
� A tract in the NorChwest !/9 of the Horthwest 1/9 of Section 17, Township 29 �oqth„','
`: Range 16 East, Pinellas County, Florida, described ae follows: '.�.� � �
-- ;� t
From the Northwest carner of said Northwest 1/9 oE Che NorChwest 1/4 of Se�Cian'17",.�. � .
run Soa°35��E^W along Che WesC bounduzy of said NorthwesC 1/4 0£ the No��hwest '�/'p of% ;•`�< :
Section i7, a distance of 73U.0 feet; thence N89°34'39•E, parallel to end 73�.0 �eeC
South of the Nozth bounr3ary of Che Northwest 1/4 oE Section 17, a distarlce�of 102,.0 c�'-; .
� feet to a Point of 8eginning, whfch point ie on the East right-o�;w�y'2iria af-U.$.
j Highway Route No. 19; from said Point of Beginning, continue N89°39'34°E,.�x distance �
( of 823.0 feeC; run thence N00°35'10"B, a distance of 131.0 £eet; run Cher�c�
N69°34'39•£ parallel to the North boundary of eaid Northweat 1/9`�of Secta`on 17, a
di.stance o£ 397.29 feet to a point which is 30.0 feet West oE the��ast-�Q�indary of -:.'
said Northwest 1/9 of the NorChwest 1/4 of Section 17t run thence NO'0°IIb'21"W para13.e1 �+:�
to the 'East boundary oE said Northwest 1/A of the Nortin�(est 1/9 of Section 17, a -•••
distance of 598.92 feet Ca a poinC, which ie 50.0 feet�Sbuth of the North boundary of �'':�
said Narthwest 1/9 of 5ection 17; run thence S89°39'34"W�p�ail�l,>to the North .�'��
boundary ot said NorChwest 1/4 of Section 17, a d�.�tance o�,�e¢E,:9fi feet; run theace '.:=;�.
Southwesterly a2ong a cuxve to the left (radius -�25:8,£eet)�•ah are distance bf 23.18 :r.�:'{s:.'-
feet (chord 22.36 feet, chord bearing S26°OB'��4"W}'�Cp.$.'�foint of reverse curvej run -
Chence SouChwesterly along a curve to the rig�it, (rati�u's SS.o feet) an arc diatance of
86.34 feet (chozd �7.78 feet, chord beari,ng_�544°�.4'3ANW) to a point of tangency; run
Chence S89°34'34"W, a distance of 153.3d"�eet Cd.a�Qd9,nt of a curve: run thence
Southwesterly along a cuxve to the left�(radiuq..1�5.A feet} an arc distance of 172.80
feeC {chord ib1.29 feet, chord bearing',$52°54'27*W)�to a point on the East =�;. :��
right-of-way line of D.S. Highway 1iouCe Ko. 19;,' run thence SDO°35'ie^YI along said East :=;,-.=:,
right=of-way line o£ D.S. Highway�13mu�e�Ajo.-L9'f�a dietance of 508.68 feeC to the Foint ��� � �:-
Of eeginning. .' � `-
, ,- ,�, �� .
. �
.',�,�A]DrAF LSGAL ABSCRIFTION i ,
• - �.:
.' �� . .
� �� ' .. •
� � ���, .
� � �
� ` ' � ? '
,',� � �
_ ' � .
.��� -- __, ,
� � `�
� ���. .
� '
� '
� _' �
t
�I
;
r,
; _ �
;
EXHIBIT �
�
•; .
�
. 1�4�GI .'�;'Y.�:� "r1��P.i: - .�:'��;�rt"P� . . _..._ _.._._
. a7� I z .,.- � . - `.r.,.'L�f;.�s t ,- .
. �. � � • .�� t���� 1;���K��ti� . . - .
r t� ' ,t,
, - �� „ � �i; t�,�C�,' . ' ��.��,:�����' • . . .�
, -,r nJ� ���,�y }:!� .. • 'it�rl�r��a+ si �
� } r��r i�.��;":'��;f;, t}YK�t�. ' . . .. . . tti�vi'i� l . .
I /.��
I - ' . . .. ... � ....... rf•�:• rYiIA+�.s .. _ '. . ..l.f._,t� � � . . . . ..- .. ...-.
+...._�..�...J... ' � �
� '
� _
��
1
�
p�NEl.LRS COUNTY FLR.-;
OFF.REC.HK 10391 PG 223�'�
/'___ �t, ,
1. Taxe��or a9sessmersto !cr the y�er 1999 and eubsaguenb ynnru, ntui eexe■ or - �' �
aseeenmenta ahich are not 9t1DW71 n� exiating liena by ths public recozda. I?ex;-'���, '��>
Parcel N4. 17-29-t6-OOQ00-22D-OI00, I99B Groe� lla�ouqt �5196,9D1.31 !.e p�id.?,',' � + �
.
2. Righta ot tersnnte accupying nl.l or part oi the insurad land under uaretordFd`.''.'�
leaees ar rentai ngraemenea. __ ���,
,' ,
3• Tez�.9, eotsditione and provipioaq n� thdt certnin uareeotdqd led�e axsc+ut�d lry�,�ad��
becween Iisrbert G, 8rowti, R.J. Wileon Ca„ trtc., PirBt NnCional Beak�,o� Tampa;and
Tempa 49hoiesala Compnny, a Piorida corpozntion deteQ 8ebsv4ty 4;],D�7g•Lepneq�a'
�neereet Sn aaid Lease haniag bsen iansigr�ad to Lucky Stor.A, Yssc., a Plbr3da-' �
eor�orafiion by iascsssmenz reeorded in Otticisi Recordn Book �8�1, peg�'�79i
lurthes aeaigned Ga Lucky SGore�, It�e., �i Dalawatr corporetion��by iliec ent
recor�ed is� DPticial Recozda Book 6766, page 13�Dt further aedi.g{ed and'�rsow held
of record by 7Caah N' Karsy Faed Store�, Znc., a nelaware corpoia�ost bSr I
. instxvmcnt recorded �n otlieial Reeosds 800k 7i43, �ege 1e5�; Agra�m�nt rsletiva i
ehereto recorded in 01'i'ieisl R4eerde Book :219, par�a�9o3, zogecher tiith any and
aIl amendments, moditicatioao es�d/or aubieaAee thare�b. al2 a; the Public Racarda i
of Pirteliea Couney, piosida. . �� . >
; 4• 2esms, conditiona and prwieion� b! shae certal,n;Aea�s�iec4tead by and betaeea , '
Arav beaeing Aeaoeiakea, a Plarida gonere� pnstt�e Bl�tp-�21 Roberdr, Zne., en Ohio
; carporation dated Ueeembcr 7, i995 a Metnotan�um o�,which xae reeorded Sa C!lieiai �
� Recorde 8ock 9Z07. page i�50, ef the Pvb13d.Rqeo�cll� oP P�nellag Caunty, @losa,da. �
' S. Term9, canditionn nnd pmvl�iene of �,hat�ca7rr�di�'$e'ciproeql Saaement AgrnamenC ` J
� execuced �r and amor►g The PirAt Nat�on�l Henk�of'Tampa, �� Tsuotee, Herbart G. !
± Browrt and H,J'. W319on CotnppnY. LYC.;��dated ]1�4�ust 15, 1975 pnd zacordsd Augu6t I
j 25, l9'75 in Cffieial Aecoxde 800k�437�;.pagd,512, o� th4 p�lia Reccrd■ o� i
' Pinellaa Cavsey, B'losid�. � `
I �.' ' _ ' �
� 6. �7aaemeat ia favor oi City� a� Cledrwnter'conteined in inetrutnent rneorded l�cvember �
' 14, 1977 in. O£ficial l�e$or�'800k i623, page 1923; St:bordinaCion af City �lti7.iCy i
• Intereata recoxded ilY,oEt3a �i��ecorde Seok 8698, page it04, of Che Pubiic ;
' Recorcl� oE Finella9'�ourit�', Pi�rl,da, •
t �� £asement in fav�sr-of�f�it�y o� Cleaxora�er coataine3 ia inst'rurEtent recorded •
Septamber 9, i�pt1-4z�pP��cia�. RecoXdp Hook 5072, pege �i2o1 8uhordinax�on eE City
Otil3.iy �nCarg��s re�a�d�cL�ia OEfxcia7. Rerords eook 8698, nege 1104 and 4fficial
Recorda eook;8699, peqa 1165,' of the Pubiic Recerde o� Piaeilqa Couaxy, Blezida.
, ` � •
. 8� ReatricCibiie.,��Ccveas£1C9 and copdit3eaa as centainecl in t37e'iri9Crumeat recorded
�7une �9, 137 iri'QPficial Rece�ds Soak 3823, pqge 4, togethrs with the Amendment,
aa r�ao�acd��Officiat Recor4t� Saok 438�, page 337, ali oE the Public Recoxde of
Q�elips��aun�c� Siarida. �
•� .� • , ,
9. Ternis;�cdrid3,tieri9 and pxovieiona o� tttat Certain Agreemer.t by and batweea Marsis
'. Bilgn�e;, ecal dnd The City of Clearwstar recarded IWgupt 2z, 1974 �t� Of�iGial
�`,�Record� Haok 42Q7, page 1273, af the Public fiecards of Pinellaa Ccunty, slorida. �
,
10. State-c£�8!orida Department oE Trasl�partat3on Aigh�-oE-S9ay l28Solution far Staca �
Highway Syetem Projeeta recorded in official Fcecords Book 838t, page 22ii $a
carreeted by ehst certain iaetXUment �ecorded in Officiel Record9 Sook 996B, page
1925 and 5tdte o� Ploridn neparcmenk of Tratf�portation �tnlnent Doa�ain Resolutilon
zecoXded ia OfP3ci87. Aecoxd� Heok 9670, pnge ts93, of the Publit Recorde a� ' +:
Pinellap County, 8�ozida.
.. ..._--- �
.,•. _ _ . • -• -
� :;s
� � �:_�
. �:'i.` �' . •
� • . -
� • . .. '
, �.,�; .. . -:,�:. - -;;;; . __ .
. .
. ..
�---��------ . . _
. __ .. ..� . ..._..._----� - - . ... __... . . _.: � . .
� ;
,
i; �
� � i
, ' � '
. � � •'
� P iNELLRS ���T� F�-R.`��`` 1
� OFP.REC.BK )d�117G' 2239 •�> :
�
�
11. Tezme, coaditioae and provieionp coatained ia t2�at cerFain Lease by Afsci'SeCveeri.��
DRSW l9 SH�8PID1G CEt�HR JOINT VE�ibR9, a Fiorida genaral pnstnerahiy dnd BaS�t$II7i.�
STDR83, I�.S., a Del�olax'e 1�qitCd pastrierehip, dnted Qetcber 28, 199�,�4 ' �
Memorandum oE mhich aas recorcled danuary 22, i997 3p OPticia2 Sgcardq�80ok 95�'�, �
page 561� pf the �iic aecoxae o£ PiAelld9 County, 810r�,da, ,",-_� __
� � ___
73. Terms, conditions nnd�provieiane cortta3aed in zeese between �I�ERT oi��ROWN, H.
S. iqlLSi� CO.� �C. 8rid THS BIRST NATIONAI� BANK OP TAMPA� AS STBH, ;a� . • .
LaridlOSC3. ai�$ bROtQN'S HQ�NxTt1RE D25TRI9�i'OR9. INC�� eB TeUarlti.daFed-}�tlguat 15, � .
i975, da 8aid TenaAta intereek waa ee93gned to ARSW LBA32NG A9SOe3AR'85, a Flozida
4en�tal pnrtnerahi.p. Sa3d aealgnlnent aEPirmed by thati cettairi Aesigrunent af Lease �
. . =@�o=asa r��n s, 3897 in D£ficinl Iteeords Book 96?9,•�page 1950. .
13. Terrtfe atu3 couditriona o� tinreCOrBed sublea9e grqtp,l�9H�N,�,ttARilY�to 8 P Oi� CO, -'.
, ,
�� �:�'. ' .
, � .. ..
�14. Matkera e�1 �hora on pusvpy pzegased by PpLlIRIS�SOCS7.�'FES� IlAC., dated 71pri1 • -
1, 1947, ].agt 4pdnted Jaanasy 11, 1999, fi7db�NO1 007-�037), aa folio+ls: ' _
. , �
� � i. +'�
, al Asphalt yavefient� 7 leot rata�qtng%xal7,.isf��,,fenae ancroach ir�to
�asement racord�d in olticis7,'tieeozde �+ook i6�i, page 197ar I,,�
� � � � • .
b) bist Pede�trien pett�vay }vnni'aq�fsom 7�arid South an� adjoitil.t�g caysioaed �
psemisee 3nbo eeptione�p3yirni�as�arld- ,' ' �
. � _
a) o+►eYhead utiiicy lij[eg, gqa`Iii�e, iire hydrants� �rnitary ■ewer
� - manhnle�, telephpnp�abld,arsd ut�ility bo�eee, drop gtatp !alata, �
evideace o� undar�n�tlid'QT& attd bfCl Cabla, dssiefage manholea, psapnne
{ tank nnd fize afqtera 'tJitpugl�out captioned preq�isep. .
� � .
15. t�forCgage from ArowrlTl����C and`Herbert G. Brown to First National Bank of Florida.
dated January 14,-19�9,,��in the principal amounC of $3,600,000.00� to be recorded in
Che Public ReSord�s,p� P3risllas County� Florida. '
?16. Assignment oP�Rents fkbm`Brown-19, I,LC and Herbert G. Brown to F3rst National Bank of
: of F1or34Tat �da`ked Jaytuary 14, 1994, Co be recorded in the Public Records of P;tnellas
f County, F],eF�i�s;'-
i - _ `. _--
;17. UCC��'���cing�5tatement from Brown-19, LLC and Herbert G. Stown to First National
a$Ak a,���lorida', dated January 14, I999, to be recorded in the Public Records of
i Pine9las�County, Flor3da.
� � •� ' '
�� �
�,
. ,
� __
i
�
i
i
�
i i��� .
� .,w �. r p. �. � - �--�.
� . . !•����.!'s!"'' ' . . `�7. . .
1 . ^+� L �
q� „i .
�•'t � . � � r
. . � c�� K) !� . �
. � - . /� � ��}'sfn • ' 't';� h V ' �
� . ". . . . _ �! . . '.y� i�� � .1�,. . . r "�
I#: 20664D3933 BK: 15457 PG: 2238, il/02/2006 at 02:34 PM, RECORDSNG 3 PAGES
$27.00 D DOC ST�MP COLLECTION $0.70 ICEN HURKE� CLERK OF COURT PINELLAS
COUNTY, FL BY DEPUTY CLERK: CLKRD22
This instrumeni prepared by, Percel No.: ]OS
or undec the dir�ctioa o� ltemlSegmern No.: 2569571
Richard vckers Managing District: Seven ;',
Deparhneni ofTransportadon County: Pinellas ', �
1 I201 North McKuiley Drive ___ '��+
Tampa,Ftorids 33612-6456 ' ' �
" �� ��
�, � .
•,' � �
. -- �.
QUITCI.AIMDEED � '� �` ,
, r `` ,
THIS IIVDEtVTt7RE,Made thia�day of�,a'�006,by end betwee�►the STA1E OF FLORIDI�b�,��, %,'
end through the STATE OF FLORIDA DII'ART1vIENT OF TRANSPORTATTON,Party of the First P�rR;wh6se '� _^
address is 712D1 North Msleolm McIGnley Drive,Tampa,Fiorida 33612-6456 to BROWN-19,LLC,AFin�Sc(a Limited ���`
Liability Company,whose eddress is 17757 US Fi'ighway 19 Narth,Suite 32i,Clearwater,F7orida 33764.� ` � �
� � + �
. � � ,
W1INESSETH --
WI-�REA.S,said land ha�einaRer descdbed was hcretofore acquired for state highw�y p�rposes;and
,�
WHEREAS,said land is no longer required for svch pu�poses,and the Pecty�o��7taF�rst Pa�t;by.�etion of the
District Secretary, Distrid Stven Florida Depardmmt of Transportation on SeptemHer t8,�2006�pursuant io the
providoas ofSection 337.25 Florida Statutes,haa sgneed to quitclnim the Iend iK.reinaftendC�cn'bed to the Perty ofthe
Second Part. � �
-- ` �
NOW Ti�REFOItE, TFIIS IIVDENTIJRE WTI'NESSETF�','Thet�tt�c�artx`gt�'the Fust Part for and in
cansideration ofthe sum ofS1.00 and other valuable considera6ons,rec�ipt and su�eieney being hereby acknowledge�
does hereby remise,rdease and qnitciaim unto the Party of the Sdoond'P�,and as��s,forever,all their rights,tide and
interest in all thst oertain fand situated in Pinellas County,Flopc��Jiz: --
,', �-
'�� �>
. ,
�',
(Sce F.xlu't►it"�k°.attachet�he�etp and mede a part hereo fl
.
,� ,� ..
� ,
. -
, �� �� .,
TO HAVE AND TO�iOLD,�the said pr taa�ises and the appurtenances tbereofu�rto the Party of the Second Part.
,� , ,,
. ,
__ '�t°'�'4�,t/
, ---_ Jim Potle,Senior Agent
+�` FL Departmem of T
ranspaitution
` ` �W Property Mwuigemrnt
`��;� ` . � 11201 N,McKinJry prjve
� � TamP�F1.3361Z�645(
i
�
� PINELLAS COUNTY FL OFF. REC. HK 15457 PG 2239
ParcelNa.: ]Oi
Iteat/Se�ent No.: 2569571
M�SNS District: Sevea ��
, ,
ounty: Pinellas
, ,
IN WI'TNESS WFiEREOF,the State ofFlorida Departmeat of Transportatian has caused these presents to be _ � -�1��
signed in the name ofthe 5tate afF7orida Department of Transportaiion by its Disirict Sccretary,Distrid Seven and its -.�� ` `,�>
scal to be hereunto a&ixed,attested by its Exewtive Secretgry,on the dafe fust above written. ,�; �� ; ; �
„
STATE OF Fi.ORIDA --
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION ,`, --'
+ ' �` .
� �` �
, 3 + �
� � . � ,
AT`TEST -- . ` ' �
By: Or► L, .
Execvtive Secretary Donald].Skelton,P.E. �'�� ' -_-
/�� District Sevon Secretary � � ���`
Print Name:_X!�n r�.c_ ���-°Y M.k.y� ' ' ; '
� � ,
, ,
WlTNESS: .� G�+26-- --
Priat Name: �� 3-I"e h CR f S�� ,�`` ,'>
��_
�` r ,�,
� \
� �
(AflvcDepartmentSeat) •'• • ,,��• �
. •
- ��;i�4,(v
,,,,'� _, ,, ,.r�' a'f�dG
, � „ -
, , , �
STATE OF FLO A , • , ,
. ,
COUNTY OF G O - --
T6e foregoing instrument wes aclmowledged before me tlLs'' ,:a.�`.d�y of ��T�r� 20D6,
by Doasld J.Skehon,P.E.,District 5ecretery for Disqict,$even,' ho is personelly Irnowa to me.
. , ,,
.','
--- `�
_ .`�
�' e:
,' �� `����� Ndtary Public in and for the Coumy and Stete last aforesaid.
(,A���otary Seal� ;My Commission Expires:
,
, . ___ ,� �n'�e�essior�� ��`
� �--_ ����.�ro
.,� u�*...
��, � ;,
,
�� ,
, ,
PINELLAS COUNTY E'L OFF. REC. HK 15457 PG 2240
` �- � eXn;bit a
SECTION 15150-2566 STATE ROAD 55 PINELLAS COUNTY DESCRIPTION
���
� ,
That part of: �+ ',
, ,
_ --� �
The Northwest 1/4 of the Northwest 1/9 of Section 17, Township 29 '�--_
South, Range 16 East, Pinellas County, Florida, more particularly -,', ��`�
described as follows: " '
�,' , �
Commence at a railroad spike marking the Northeast corner of the ' /
Northwest 1/9 of Section 17, Township 29 South, Range 16 East, Pinellas __
County, Florida, run thence N.89E56`49"W., a distance of 2489.93 feet ,','� ����`�•�;
along the North boundary of the t3orthwest 1/4 of said Sectian 17; ' { �� ',
thence S.DOE03'll"W., a distance of B5.00 feet to the POINT OF__, �`���� �;
6EGINNING; thence 5.37E12'90"W., a distance of 78.7fi feet to the SoutJr"' --
right-of-way line of prew Street; said South right-of-way iine being�a `����-�
curve; thence Northeasterly, 79.56 feet along said right-of-way l�me � ,
and the arc of a curve to the right, having a radius of 135.00 feet �d, , ;
a central angle of 33E95'S3" (chord bearing N.73E10'14"E., 78.41 feet)�;,__�'
thence S.89E56'99"E., along said right-of-way line, a distance of
153.39 feet to the beginning of a curve; thence NortheastE.7cly, 71.20
feet along said right-of-way line and the arc of said eu�L.e to �k�e
left, having a radius of 55.00 feet and a central arl�3e of�79'�10'�6"
{chord bearing N.52E57'S8"E., 6b.34 feet); thence ',N�,89�56;99:'J�., a
distance of 233.71 feet to the k'OINT OF BEGINNZtJ�. '�`, .�," ,
. �
Containing 9,752 square feet, more or less. _- � �,
�
-..: `� �
��
� �� ,.` ��
� � � � '
, � � �
�' � � ' �
. ,
L�p�D�OAI', � ---
na�• a e� � " �.�
FI'DcP�Q� iansRor�n
D7 Susveyiug gc M�pp�
� ' ..
.�
� �� �`�� ,
' � � ��
� � , �
` � �
�` ---
`� ''-
.
`�� � ��
�
�� �
, ,
, ,
i#: 2006323005 BK: 15334 PG: 1320, D8/29/2006 at 03:52 PM, RECORDING 2 PAGES
$18.50 D DOC STAMP COLLECTION $245.00 F�N BURFCE, CI,ERK OF COURT PZNELI.AS
COLJNTY, FL HY DEPLJ'!Y CLERK: CI.I�M04
PRSPARED BY AND RETORN T0:
HARRY 5. CLINE, £squire ;,`
Macfazlane Ferguson & McMullen `,��
�
625 Court Street, Suite 200 -_ _ '� �
Post Office Box 1669 (33757) '-- �
Clearwater, Florida 33756 -,�� ���
, � .
',' � i
WARRAt1TY DEED __
. - .
+ � `�`` .
�� ' � ,� �i `
THIS INDENT[JRE made this �� day of August, 2006, by and _ `� `� ,' �
between MTCHAEL A. CAIRNS, a aingle pereon of the County o��� `� ` ' -_.
, ,.
i � � �
Pinellas, in the State oF Florida, Party of the First Part, whose�, ; �
. � � ,
mailing address ia 4001 Bosswood Drive, Columbus, OH 43230 and�-,;_"�.'
BROWN-19, LLC, a Florida limited 1lability company, of;'the County
of Pinellas, in the State of Florida, Party of the Secd�cl�Paxt,,�
� �; .,�
whoee mailing addrese is 17757 US Hwy. 19 I�.�,'-S�rte�..�25,
� �
Clearwater, FL 33764. � ��''� '
�
� �
- ` �
W Z T N E S 5 E T,�[;-_; `� �
�
That the said Party of the First �P9rt, for��and�in consider-
, � � ,
ation of the sum of Ten Dollara ($10�.�OQ) `�o it ,3n' hand paid by the
said Party of the Second PaLC,��'the���ceipt whereof is hereby
' . . . ��
acknowledged, has granted, baig,ain'�d�and sold to the said Party of
� , . .
Che Second Part, heiF�'�anpl t9�;gns forever, the following
. ,
described land, situate`1Xilig�and being in the County of Pinellas,
State of Florida,.�ro-witi� �
r � , ` ..
� �
A Tract�,iri,�`�he Nottihwest 3f of the Northwest �{ of
Section �7�, 'sol�,nsx,ip��29 South, Range 16 East, Pinellas
Cour�y, F�io�ida;-"described ae follows: From the
No1'th�a9£'eo�nar of said Northwest 1,6 of the Northwest '�f
qf, SeFh.'ton 7?;' zun South, along the Eaet boundary of
said,�NArC�west ;f of the Northwest ',f of Section 17, a
dist�rl�e��o� 50 feeC; thence South, a distance of 598.92
.
,feet; � �-un thence West, a distance of 30 feet; thence
`,Tlorth�,'a distance of 548.92 feet; thence East, a
�istence of 30.00 feet to the Point of Seginning.
Subject Co 2006 real estate taxes, restrictions,
reservations and easements of record.
Parcel I.D. No. 17/29/16/00000/22�/0400
PINELLAS COUI3TY FL OFF. REC. BK 15334 PG 1321
' �---�—�--- —
http:l,tnail.google.comlmuiV?vicw=att&dispQvnhBcottid=0.l&th=10d...
And the said Party of the First Part does hereby fully warrant the
title to said land, and will defend the same against the lawEul
claims of all persons whomsoever.
�",
, ,
IN wITNESB WHEREOF, the said Party of the F'irst Part has hereunto ', `�
set his hand and seal the day and year first ab�ve written. -__ ', �
_ ,
Signed, Sealed and nelivered �� � `�•�
�,' � ,
'n Our Presence: `����
� ay �� ; ., .
�iS�1 � _ ``' ` �
I + ,
� , �
1 , �
rint � �J MiCHAEL A. CAZRNS __, � � __,'�.�
�� �_,
i �� �� �
i � �
..�.c+.c�/..t�! �L�.......r � � � i
� � � �
Print Name .,ff�AKrr �. .Jy�/i9,rJau,f,� , -= ,
.` ��
STATE OF OHIO �;�;-,
, � '
'F��„k t;., , , '
courrrY oF , ,,.;, .
,
I HEREHY CERTIFY, that on this day per�sonall��app�ared before me,
an officer duly authoriaed to ac}fii�rii�ter ��txatd�is and take
acknowledgmenCS, MICSAEL A. CI►.tRiqs, a S$aQle ma�, '.h.'a me personally
known or who has produced G��o-v�'��.=.s.C�t+fi�.r�-= � � as identification
and who did take an oath, and knoWq�.to.m@ to�be the individual(s)
described in and who executad,��he. foreggii�g instrument and he
acknowledged before me that he,'execvte�l`�Che same for the purposes
. �
therein expressed. � �
�,� �, .
�," �iw�.t
WITNE��S,f my hand and of�3cia1 s'e�1 at C,t�, said County and State,
thiso2,"'aay of August, ,206b. � ` '
�'�'r `�`� ,,,`�%z�.L c.C jC�cc�s.-.-'
�o�Eary Pub�ic„ � � _
� � r,•
� Pt� < < � �����
�i�it_NdIP�� C�tt'u .c c•�:1.J - . "
'- `My.Commission Expires: /:ZS-e 9 •
__, r.
`�.` � �� .�..
� ,
i ,
h:1du mlrslljti��browndeed.�«
_, i
�
1 of 1 RQ4/2066 1:]0 PM
. ___ ___ _ _ _
�•
I ' ��_�'_ ��
� � 3 4 � � � �
E���� y:r
I � i!
�g�`� ��•
i I I I � �� [] I � I I ��E��� °�e
_-o-z � , �_-0 � ��;g;Q�rR
- , --------' ------ E I pX.�v !�
� _ , .
I I I I f'�
I I I I I��� I �
I I I I W'��� I i ; ,
I I I I w��� I i �
I I I I ��, I j � �
I I I I ��� I j � �p �
o-- ------ -- ----- --- , ' m d
�— ----------�------- —}— -------�-- -{L--- ---- � -0 I � t5 �
I I I I i�'� I � �s �
I� I I I 4`r ----- --I� I � I ����p
I I I f„ i I I � � �
I I I I'„ i j ; I �
� �
I I I G„ I I ' �
I I I f„ I I ; i , !
� o-- ---------- - 1- -- -- ----- �-- -----l------- -�- -----L- - ---� -------- !--0 i :
I EXISTING BUILDING I I�',� I PROPOSED ADOITION I i I ' �
' i 30,000 S.F. i i�., i 17,200 S.F. i i � �
I � I I I',i I � i j �W
I I I I; I I ' ~
I I I f,� I I I � j ��
I I I I'�,� I i j j � ��� �
I I I I I I � � I °�W'� �
� ' � °C�
o-- — — -- 1---------- r— --------r--- �; � � .� a �� �
, , — ---- — — ---- -i , � _ <
' �------ -�- —
3°° 6
i I I I P,j I I j � I W
: �
Q
I I I � �o� �
I'�,! I I ,
I �
; I I I I','� I I ' ��:
� �- � I I I','� I I j i � �
, � � �
j I I I I I'�,'� I I j �
a' i a��na�
( �—
� � A7^ '_—_—_—_ �-_� �a�... '—_—_—___—_—_ _ � 4�' —_— _— _— —_— —_ — __ — _ _i 'A1
f �� � �� _—� ___-_=-_ I I I I �;�o�.cr. ::.. ,:: ..umr��.. � ��..:.�
� '
j f l I - I _ i I� � � �
� b b b �`� b b b ��b 8 b �
, a��
� /�1 ARCHTECTURAL FLOOR PLAN M
� �i�x..,._o. A21
m�:m.oi.ii
r�' w: i i
I%�' y�
�����g ��
� �
E;�g� '�ie
. • i
'����I ��i
�.o.-� 1�ps:y ti!
_ - r�',�— lx:51C@ eg�
ps?N'-��• ��
�.n+s ��
�n.ww�m - _ u`iC/v�} •�\W yjJ�;i _ _ �m.�.
C/U`''�•
� ------------- _ _ _ - -- --- - _ _ ,.o.s�
____._ _ I
0��-0• _ -- - - —
ca wwm
� .___-_ ——__ —
� — g�
�y.� � S
IYIAIED Ratll � �
�Irt I(R COTIIC~BI.�bIE P�ILGIbI w � �
� NORTH EXTERIOR FIEVATION � �
��� ����p
�o-�
� 0 0.-�.
� �
�:a-,.� � _
�
�iu.wsam 1 0 4 � �co.�ww�xr
'�. _ _ _ .. ._____.____. ________._____ _____________________ ___ _ ..
_____..___-__-
�I — -
i0-a' ! —
r� � — —
_ — _—_____ — �
— W
0a'-a• --__--- -------- Z
�wv�m noon
W
V t
J¢
WEST EXTERIOR ELEVATION 6 F� o
2 ,nz•-�-0• �W+ �
¢� �
�
T t
; I II lili -' ii i i rr�— � YJ� us�
, � � i I III �'�i �I ii� � I�'ll�� I�� I� II �I���lil� G� iS
�- I i � I
� �YA_'Y601M = — - , — 'i �'; ij� ���li�lll� li, I li'I � I ' I j II�I: IIII� �I�II I �i �;�i �r I ,j�II � -- - - imusmrae
} a.-0. 7 li..'�. '�I i i I.�I I I� I I�I i I� I�I I I.�!�!I il u If I.I� I� I I I II.II hl'��I I�I I I II�'c I�i II�i I���i I�I:I�:��r: I�I�il I n 1,I��..III In� 'I I:��:I!II�:lill I�I ��I�II:�I.�-�%�I I i I I�III!III'I il�'I���� i I I�:;I':II�(I I�I II�I�I IIII i I I I I I I:���'�:�I�I II I��I I I���i r �I ��ii.� �
p �r.o.wsaar _ _ __ __— �j�I I,!�i�i��I.I�.I.II�� PFltlllf
�. � -__ _— - .
. _ ....— ___
-- '__ —
: — --:--- .__—_ CONS�p.
g :- - ,_ _—
� - — — xtxs�s:
1 7 -_ - —
i
° - '= -
g o-o• —
E �ms�mnaax ... --- — ---- ,:.
�
______ ____- I
� .. . . . .. . _._ -___________
__
i._.. i._ _'__-'___- ______ '._..
— mav�mnox usmc wnw
�
g �REAR EXTERIOR ELEVATION
,n:..,.-0.
� �uwa�a
M00�
�
m A4.1
� hw. :o.oi.n
- rn' xo.: i�
• . �
� . . � . . . , �
� �� i '� � F �
*,.. �� ; � .� , � ., �
..� . �h.��R`����; , �
;� � �� �� �` -�, -,.�y�;,j.�; .. �'r �,�..� ,� . . ..
_ a� � w ,� �1� i ., '`�'�c � �� � �� -. ���� r_
� }/�, �
y _ �
. � ,.
�}� .
'F ', �. , ` ..
. �
, . • ..
" '
�. ' �' � , ' - . �y.
�'
.
{
p . ''
.
, �R\'►1� �� � �
.� , �� �: . .'l ��:.,� i .1� �,, I` .�. � .. , .. "i,: , ;. r :,a ' . . ?t�.� �• `'-i���s�. rv
, �
. . . .
� ' ` _- -- _ __..._ - " ..
R. ;
.
. �
. �,.5,
}. f ' ` ..
, .� . � . ... - � .. . .. _ _ .e.rr�I+n�y� .,� "
; _ _ � . ��- .. . _ �.
� . .� �. ..+ ,�
.� .
'
.,: d . � _.. _.- - __ .
. ... . '�
.= 4
t" . - r rr p . F' � rj r'a"r' .t '. �r` � . . , . . ' ' ... . ._. � . ��•
� t+kF M�""�.w��l���� ����1 Ma. ` �.�..T Ic+�;.�"'� � . ."i .,,....,.,y}... . , . y.
.
i;:� ��� � . . .. e �J: . S�� � �� ` - �
` ��;:. F a� . �. .,rfF ..�..:, ...:: Mn...�'�4' x •� �-`�- �Ek
�w.l��. . ,♦ t��� ��� . �. 1 .. _ t � � ' �4 ... .�`��-,-`;-^.-,?�,.����,ti4 .... . ..
w,..� . $ ; �y� ' .Y.�m„ �,�. � .�. '� : �--�-t'i�"':.v
���
�'
� -- -am s __ . _ ,.
.� .'
�' �a � ,.o-... �~� � < ':. -"�;1 .r;'> "� �" � � -�
�._
' ,; -._.- -`--'--` ` �� —
,�. i .'13 t ., • r�� i . a.,. .x . '- �. _
, �..._ .. ... .., a�n `�T
.� �". . . . . ,. �,�� .� `'� _ Ff I
��.� (1�1,�� ��c"rr-��rl �. ���\\\� �J� V .. . ,.�'
Ia .�� p' � '#�
�� �;, , - 1�� .,�',�.
� � � � � � �:.. _�
1 • ��'�" � , .gEST � ,' ���
�: � �� -
� �;�,�'� i.� _ �Y :- ; !^"
,5 � � � � r �,
, _ ,
; � �"�� ; � � �, � a `} �.
. '�. . p g i � 7 .
�. ! � f�Y i .....� I - �\�� ��. --� _ 'R
� � ( �`{� ���� _ S��1� +. .,
• «
� , 1 1 + .._. ,
. � .,,
; w
` . �1 � `/ _ __- _ _ - ...
„ �1� � _1 - �`�+..�
�
. �� - � ' , � , .
� 1 1 / � � �
,tT �� �_ '_ �'+ � � ( _ � Y� �
�� � �_
� ' ���kA � � i l�� ��' � � a t ,,, � �-� � _ � . Q a �.� r
��. ��; F r;g� —
� F,
�'��,�; .� J� � �6 �� _ �'. f� ,�, �:
p r„ �, .�.� . � .. - :� :,:�is ,'....:.. _ S ��� �"4
. . . ... . �. .. ...
� a � :_:, . .:, ,;;; ,.,..:,.._� �� ;,! � �` ��_
, ;. 6
� _ _.. ,.
� � ' � � � � �3�� �... ,. v, 8 �� ,
! .�.
; . � ' _ ___ __. ! ,
'` � " PROPOSED — ,.:� x, ��.
I �
' ' � � ADDITION �tn� �Y
. . �>
.
� � �� � �p� �: ,�.z�sF '' ''s� Marshalls e���� ; � a ��,. „ �, ,�;� ;:.4�-.-_
� � � �C i� ���1w1!_� ��Vi _ �� f :m-��-�t «-a... . '..,�/�. � e �qz
• P
� . � ,
; �.. 1� � """"„ ., _ ' ' . � M.��� �..,.
{ �
�� _" .
�� � :,
.
. 1�y�r ' � Y f+�•
°'z:� F"'•' •1 ,... +� � =,��" � � ,_j s�`.
ri .�- " � - .:�� _. �.t� �F �f
. .
... _, ,
� .
� �� ik� .. .,�r � ��: '�, . . � :, a�,'" .. ,��� - �� :
� � ��` � _ -� - �� __ '� �
���, , . 4,. � r . _ .�s .�»z.`�i...�+ ._- .�Y.�.� �
a�
1�,.�
� .
, ,- -
� �g,�; .'� � �,{i,;.. i rt r .... .,..,.....,.,� n `� !I- ,r��:- �^° r �.�"+�,:,�ac�a'C' +� _� � .� „"�r',�„`
.
.
��. ��r t,'�*
, z
� +. �
L
� � �w _ �' ' +� '�
.'�� , .'w , q.. �
#.L . �., I , �. .� '�� ' � ..�� ,
i, i�� 'i � ��� . . , � F� ' � • � �
�� � ' , � ,�
�
�
, �
a� �a � ,r ,� � ; � :
i� �� � .
+y }t� .rc �� y =� �",��.`c
� � .
� , .
, . . . `s"
� �� y � � __ a �����
. � ���
.
i� .4�. rr` �'f,p• . ..IM:� .' ,. .. � l �• �5
. ...,e�n,a.:.
r: � � �
a..
�._ . S�L�.. '�. � . ' I
:.� . . . . ..: . .. . . ... . . . .� �,.e�.a� •.,
p ! , � /
., v '.. .. . n.�
...... . ..... ..... , ...e.. .� . .. �. �. nn6-'i"'''... '+,�.',.:
�fA—M�2
. : '� � : A�-Y
..._. ._ �:A P9lF
3� e�
�.� ..__'__..___ '' �
' I M-f
i„-0.W9pRl . :... � �� .'. ...... ..._... ....__.. ._. __— t •A YW1P'
. ....._ . . .� l .._. ` .,. ,.
�1�-0' _ ...... : . . � _ �. _...
___— .._ ..^
_ -._ . ...... .. _
141�IiR�M' _— . . . . ; ... '-- . _
��.�. ..._ _. .�._—___ �_...�. ,_. -_- . .
�
— _ .
-. _ :.._ .��
j� , ,.
' r
---
_.
-
z- _.r ,_,.,,; , , , � -S . . �
.
__ •
_ 1
. .
:. . .. ' . ' ..h .. _ ., _ . .
a• — i
< .. —
•�c: . .. .. — - ..
�. "W.. � I .. _ .._ _. .
_....��.�+��nc"�+ _-. �c�-�. , ,..; ,. ,t....,�..
.
r. ._ •_ " ♦�.trr�k '�:.o.:� . ' K'WMv�
�-. ._ . �iV .t . � ��.
pr�'. +�# �M.e Y� .�.,".:s ` r�
� �.�N
""' � �b.'G" ,� �'a � �'� F� = ',
.�n: �,.�� ..�`�.�',"'�,��'s.• . . . . . � - .. . � . . � a!a'•H-It � .�,�.�:..,��.: �I
i.±o�
r
�
�tt-n _''_ , . . . .
ia.canaa
0 in�irsc.vr � � M''�
�co min_
� I
i �
, ` .
�.�•_p• ._,� Jr. -+ .
.
� �iA. SMAr . r� :� �' I
_ . _ k .�
. � s
t .. r „ „ :� � �
_
—
r - ., ,
� , _ � I ,. . "'�^: �. . — -
l`i�a'Rdal" � I . .... . ... .. .. �
� . � �/� �'l ;�--J---- _ �r- ---- 1 ' .��' �
e �^' � . �?� �+� � �'— ��4� .
� „ �� � 1 ��g � M. . .
� °�` �t �°�� '" �' • �. "�'' �W �YVE37 EXTFAIOR ELEYATIOW ���
� ,��•_,.-�•
m. ,., ,,
r�.;. : x �� �: ���
. . , :... .. . .. . _-- -- '� .,�; �,�`y"t^� t`���,�a�� � .yt . � . :.
�,,,.., . � , . �
r,.
. �� . .��'���c, .. ... ' ._ _ ... .
,.. ...,, ._.,�...�v .
x. .. . .. . . ,. . ...
�A Ytl'CW� �..—_—_"_ .....
�y N-Q � �
'YtII YtlpF! ... .. . _ _—_'_"'" . .'_""_..... . . . .. ....... . .
�^. � . ...... � � .
.
� �� .i ! - . ....
�n�� � �� �.., :�.... ... . .... ..'.' �... .. � .I .�',:�.i:� �.�. .�. . . .... . :...'.. �
.�^w'k 3" ... . . . . .. ... .... - .— .—— ....
� ��. � �•..
� =f
.
u » �,�_� . �
ff �,
__.�„_
_.�__.,��._____._m_______
.�'.i#� ' ��k'R'Yr' �$' � �yy'
r; �. . , .. . < . �
. +
j
�„ , � , � q 1 Nit
,{ e REAR EXTERIOR ELEVA
'�...�.>,,`�,e '.'��"�1",�:«+ , r: .:a>-� �. � . �nn,.3. ^�'., �•., r.�. ,' _. J 3/:f=i-.
__--_ ..... . .. ..... . :� ...... ..�.... ..... . .. ... . . :..... ... . . . . .. ...........
r' �
- Painted CMU/SpliHace SW7006"Erztra White" SVW098'Pacer Whde I SW5100"Pract�wl Beige" � SW 6101"Sands nf Time" � � Alucobond Panef �
cw
SW7006"Ezira White" '� � Anodized Clear Finish -!-!; �
� i �
� B A B I E S R U S E X PA N S I O N EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS
DREW & 1 9 RETAIL CENTER �-; -� F 1 s h e I�
�r ______ _______ _ � A rc h ite c ts
� 2_ :���o,o
/��
Toys R Us Babies R Us Celebrating 41 Years of Quality Manufacruring and Service '�,41
Clearwater, FL
� i
63'S 5/8" -j
�
26'-4 1/4"
- � 29'-7" I
- - - - - - - - - - -
i
- - - - - - - - - 0 � _
j _ _ �
� � � __� � `-' I �H� 1 ■ � , � � �
4�'8�� ' 4'-0 � SIGN & AWNING CO INC
O _ � �
1 J ' 4590 1 1 8TH Avenue North
- ' - - - - - - - - - ... - - - - - - - - - - .
�� �
Clearwater, Florida 33762
, - - - - - - -
� - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ' l_____-J' : 1 � •
LED Illuminated Channel Letters Scale:3/16°=i� 43, 8„ ' www.thomassign.com
TOYS R Us and BABIES R Us identity channel letter faces to be
acrylic,trimmed with a 1"jewelite, decorated with 3M vinyl ��'-�� s�s" 22'-2" Toys R Us Babies R Us
to conform with"To s R Us and Babies R Us"color ro ram. p _ - - - - - - j _ _ _ _ _ o _ _ - - - - - � - - - - - 49'�74'�"'h''
Y p 9
Backs and returns to be.063 aluminum. Returns to be 5 dee A ELEV CL
3 2 � � Installation Address
All channel letters to be illuminated with ener savin LED l � � �
gy g �_ � 2131 5 Us HWY 10,
components powered by low voltage transformers. - - - - - - - - - - - � clearwacer, FL
284�-��� � Pro�ect Ident�ty Number
Frontage area=8989.66'
� 46576
,�..,. Sq.Ft.:Toys R Us= 133.1' � ��
DOMINIC NEl50N TH
`�'ro cnRr� �
-� Sq.Ft.:Babies R Us=149.0' , ,.
I_ 1 ,i7 I T�, I IZ1 --� ���
; ,. � � Total Signage Sq.Ft.=3.1 /o of Store frontage Sq.Ft. ' �s� oe�2s/ZOi i
:..!.- —
�To�oA�E �r��� , ;j
.,
� ,. . � f ro;eci Not�.-�
r.e. ; _ __. _. � Ta �S� 6A6iES �JS � - .- --- _ _ r.ai X
TO.MNSON ! — _ .__' rOF';SOVPV'
.... .-- : . �.
X
���--- ----- __., ,
39'-3" ! I , ; ' E '
' �
� . . I . �..� I �. . . � 28�-4�� Project completion X
i�11 ' � . .... : . � � i � ..._ Xunir_i
_... ...._.. ',
_'____ .. . :
T.O.MRSON � �� � - � _... �— F�alrty
� i 1
-- — f i�
� ��, --- . Square Footage Allowable X �
------- ---- - �, r, �'� '�� I � --- � .,..._ _
-- —----------------- ------ ------ ----
' � ------ --- i .
+ - � �"J � �, i � Square Footage Shown-X �
o,-0. � i � �- -- - - — -- _ ---- __
— _ --- -- , _ _ -
�
— -- ----- -- — --- --�- -- -- ---- __ . _ -
'a FiN�sHeoFioon - '— ---- --- ------- - ---- ; Project Updates
16'-0' l 116'd' �,
� ENIS?ING BIN.DNIG PMJVOSFD ADDIIIOI�'
162'-8"
Frontage area=5037' �
;9-�• EQ Sq.Ft.:Toys R Us=6339'
�-T°`�"`E EQ Sq.Ft.:Babies R Us=70.1'
�TO.COANKE r ... . -
':_. ___ _ _ ,
I _
,�,,3_>>• � I I__ I�L _I I_�1 _ Total Signage Sq.Ft.=2.6%of Store frontage Sq.Ft. '
_-
TO.CONN[E ❑Approved
�]9d' �. . . .. ����/ ��A� ;___ , 2fs'
—__ _ .__._—___--_
��_ —_—________ -_'_
" TC.NASONAY -_-__...__ _ ._ .....______ — .
� �' 1 ?o rr�sonx+ DATE:
— ---._- ---____ _. `� EQ ', ❑Approved as noted
39'-3" ' �, � ', I ' ..._
DATE:
. � -�_ -j �I � �� ❑Revise&Re-Submit
I -- =: : �
,
,°°. �� - � in
� � z _ /� r
t0.nu50wltt . . I � — f ,� ^ DATE
� 8 4 VO�V � „9:
u
_ _ � '
r d 9 n� d a
-- - ----- --------- -- � -- --------- — — —
�� � ; - - I �„J'Graphics 3M ° ,.,,. ,
, ,< <,,P
� � „�
- — --- - l -_ — -- _----- ' aunar+�n nu�ncn,wEa `
_ _
c-0 _ — ' ---- � FUSA550488 •.�-
_
..
r F�N��EOF��A
I �
�.� -:--- ��� - - --� <5,. -- --__ __� 1 of 1
Front Elevation
Scale:3/64"=1' • •,
� :