FLD2011-07026; 622 BYPASS DR; CAREY & LEISURE LAW PARKING .
..
�
622 BYPASS DR
Date Received: 7/29/2011 1 :02:07 PM
Carey & Leisure Law Parking
ZONING DISTRICT: Office
LAND USE: ResidentiaUOffice General
ATLAS PAGE: 299B
PLANNER OF RECORD:
PLANNER: A. Scott Kurleman, Planner III
.
CDB Meeting Date: October 18, 2011
Case Number: FLD2011-07026
Agenda Item: D. 1.
Owner/Applicant: Thomas W. Carev, Trustee of the T & L Land Trust
Address: 622 & 628 Bypass Drive
CITY OF CLEARWATER
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
STAFF REPORT
GENERAL INFORMATION:
REQUEST: Flexible Development application to permit the addition of 20 off-street
parking spaces for an existing 15,247 square foot office building in the
Office (0) District with a lot area of 66,211 square feet (1.52 acres), a
lot width of 152 feet (along Druid Road) and 438 feet (along Bypass
Drive), a building height of 22 feet, a front (south) setback of 19 feet
(to proposed pavement) and 90.2 feet (to existing building), a front
(east) setback of 15 feet (to proposed pavement) and 88.3 feet (to
existing building), a side (west) setback of 4.5 feet (to proposed
pavement) and 9.9 feet (to existing building), a side (north) setback of
zero feet (to existing building and pavement), and 73 parking spaces as
a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project under the provisions of
Community Development Code Section 2-1004.B.; as well as a
reduction to the west landscape buffer from five feet to 4.5 feet as a
Comprehensive Landscape Program under the provisions of
Community Development Code Section 3-1202.G.
ZONING DISTRICT: Office (0) District
FUTURE LAND USE
PLAN CATEGORY: Residential/Office General (R/OG)
PROPERTY USE: Current: Office
Proposed: Office
EXISTING North: Office (0) District
SURROUNDING Offices
ZONING AND USES: South: Medium Density Residential (MDR) District
Attached Dwellings
East: Office (0) District
Office
West: Unincorporated
Util ity/Infrastructure
Community Development Board—October 18,2011
FLD2011-07026—Page 1
�ANALYSIS:
Site Location and Existing Conditions:
The 1.52 acre property is located at the northwest corner of Druid Road and Bypass Drive.
Bypass Drive is a commercial corridor that runs north to south between Gulf to Bay Boulevard
and Druid Road. Along the corridor are primarily retail, office and restaurant uses. The property
has 438 feet of frontage on Bypass Drive 152 feet along Druid Road and can be accessed from
Druid Road, Bypass Drive and a shared vehicular access area to the north. As the property is
located on a corner lot it has two front setbacks and two side setbacks.
The surrounding land use is mainly commercial with an office located to the north, Sam's Club
and vacant land to the east, attached dwellings to the south across Druid Road and a Progress
Energy transmission line easement to the west. The subject property contains a 15,247 square
foot office building housing Carey and Leisure Law offices which was approved through
FLS2002-12082.
Development Proposal:
The proposal is to permit the construction of an additional 20 parking spaces on the southern
portion of the parcel. No changes are proposed to the intensity, lot area or width, or setbacks to
existing building. The existing building has setbacks ranging from a maximum of 90.2 feet to a
minimum of zero feet. Regarding the site,the existing curbing along the southern drive aisle will
be removed for the additional parking. The proposed parking area will have setbacks to
pavement as follows: a front (east) setback of 15 feet, a front (south) setback of 19 feet and a
side (west) setback of 4.5 feet. The existing parking lot along the side (north) is a shared
vehicular access area and no changes are proposed there.
Pursuant to Community Development Code (CDC) Section 2-1004, the minimum side setback
for an office use can range between 10 — 20 feet. The proposed side (west) setback is 4.5 feet;
thus the filing of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project application. The development
proposal's compliance with the applicable development standards of the CDC is discussed
below.
Intensitv: Pursuant to the Countywide Plan Rules and CDC Section 2-1001.1, the m�imum
allowable intensity is a floor area ratio (FAR) of 0.50. The proposal is in compliance with the
above as it has a FAR of 0.235.
Impervious Surface Ratio (ISR): Pursuant to the Countywide Plan Rules and CDC Section 2-
1001.1, the maximum allowable ISR is 0.75 for R/OG. The overall proposed ISR is 0.452, which
is consistent with the above.
Minimum Lot Area and Width: Pursuant to CDC Table 2-1004, there is no minimum required lot
area or lot width for a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project. However, for a point of
comparison, the minimum lot area requirement for offices is 3,500 square feet. The subject
property is 66,211 square feet (1.52 acres). Also for comparative purposes, the minimum lot
width requirement for offices is 50 feet in width. The lot width along Bypass Drive 483 feet and
along Druid Road it is 152 feet. Both the lot size and lot width are consistent with the above.
Community Development Board—October 18,2011
FLD2011-07026—Page 2
Minimum Setbacks: Pursuant to CDC Table 2-1004, there are no minimum setback requirements
for a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project. However, for a point of comparison, the
minimum front setback requirement for offices can range between 15 —35 feet and the minimum
side setbacks can range between 10—20 feet.
With regard to the existing building, the minimum required setbacks are all being met with the
exception of the side (north) setback where the existing building and pavement are located on the
property line. As this is an existing building and no changes are proposed other than additional
parking it will not impede the development and improvement of surrounding properties.
Regarding setbacks to pavement, flexibility has been requested for the side (west) setback to 4.5
feet to proposed pavement. The other setbacks to proposed pavement include a front (south)
setback of 19 feet and a front (east) setback of 15 feet, both of which are within the minimum
setback requirements. Staff supports the request for the side (west) setback of 4.5 feet to
proposed pavement as the adjacent property is a Progress Energy transmission line easement and
as such,the setback to proposed pavement will not visually be apparent.
Maximum Buildin� Hei� Pursuant to CDC Table 2-1004, there is no m�imum allowable
building height for a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project. However, for a point of
comparison, the m�imum building height for an office can range between 30 — 80 feet. The
existing building height is 22 feet, well within the range based upon the above Code provisions.
Minimum Off-Street Parkin�: Pursuant to CDC Table 2-1004, the minimum required parking for
a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project is determined by the Community Development
Coordinator based on the specific use and/or ITE Manual standards. The off-street parking
requirement for offices is three spaces per 1,000 square feet of gross floor area. For 15,247
square feet of office floor area, this results in a requirement of 46 spaces. Currently there are 53
parking spaces and 73 are proposed. The applicant conducted a parking study which showed that
the office employs 51 employees, averages 10 to 15 walk in clients per day and conducts a
minimum of one to two depositions and mediations per month. The average number of people
attending depositions and mediations is between four and six. With this number of employees
and clients, the parking lot is full on a daily basis which causes clients to park on Bypass Drive
and Sam's Club parking lot. Staff supports the request for the increase in the number of parking
spaces based on the parking study.
Si�ht Visibility Triangles: Pursuant to CDC Section 3-904.A, to minimize hazards at the
driveways, no structures or landscaping may be installed which will obstruct views at a level
between 30 inches above grade and eight feet above grade within 20-foot sight visibility
triangles. No structures or landscaping is proposed within the site triangles.
Solid Waste: The existing refuse area is located on the south side of the building with appropriate
screening. This has been found to be acceptable by the City's Solid Waste Department.
Landscapin�: Since the existing use will not be improved in excess of 25 percent of the value of
the principal structure, no landscape requirements must be met other than the requirements for
the areas in which the parking has been expanded. Pursuant to CDC Section 3-1202.D.1,this site
is required a 10-foot wide landscape buffer along Druid Road and Bypass Drive and a five foot
Community Development Board—October 18,20l 1
FLD2011-07026—Page 3
wide landscape buffer along the west property line. The proposal includes a 15-foot wide
landscape buffer along both Druid Road and Bypass Drive. Due to the required drive aisle
widths, the proposed buffer along the west property line is proposed at 4.5 feet rather than the
required five feet.
Pursuant to CDC Section 3-1202.E.1, 12 percent of the gross vehicular use area shall be provided
as landscape islands a minimum of eight feet wide and 150 square feet in size. The site proposes
15.1 percent of the vehicular use areas to be landscape islands.
To mitigate for the deviations to the buffer requirements along the west property line, the
applicant has provided additional buffer plantings along both Druid Road and Bypass Drive.
Comprehensive Landscape Program: Pursuant to CDC Section 3-1202.G, the landscaping
requirements contained within the Code can be waived or modified if the application contains a
Comprehensive Landscape Program satisfying certain criteria. The following table depicts the
consistency of the development proposal with those criteria:
Consistent Inconsistent
1. Architectural theme:
a. The landscaping in a comprehensive landscape program shall be designed as a part of N/A N/A
the architectural theme of the principle buildings proposed or developed on the parcel
proposed for development;or
b. The design, character, location and/or materials of the landscape treatment proposed X
in the comprehensive landscape program shall be demonstrably more attractive than
landscaping otherwise permitted on the parcel proposed for development under the
minimum landscape standards.
2. Lighting: Any lighting proposed as a part of a comprehensive landscape program is N/A N/A
automatically controlled so that the lighting is turned off when the business is closed.
3. Communiry character: The landscape treatment proposed in the comprehensive X
landscape program will enhance the community character of the City of Clearwater.
4. Property values: The landscape treatment proposed in the comprehensive landscape X
program will have a beneficial impact on the value of property in the immediate vicinity
of the parcel proposed for development.
5. Special area or scenic corridor plan: The landscape treatment proposed in the N/A N/A
comprehensive landscape program is consistent with any special area or scenic corridor
plan which the City of Clearwater has prepared and adopted for the area in which the
arcel ro osed for develo ment is located.
Code Enforcement Analysis: There are no outstanding Code Enforcement issues associated
with the subject property.
Community Development Board—October 18,2011
FLD2011-07026—Page 4
COMPLIANCE WITH STANDARDS AND CRITERIA:
The following table depicts the consistency of the development proposal with the standards and
criteria as per CDC Sections 2-1001.1 and 2-1004:
Standard Existing/Proposed Consistent Inconsistent
F.A.R. 0.50 0.235 X
I.S.R. 0.75(R/OG) 0.452 X
Minimum Lot Area N/A 66,211 square feet(1.52 acres) X'
Minimum Lot Width N/A Druid Road 152 feet X�
Bypass Drive 438 feet X1
Maximum Height N/A 22 feet X�
Minimum Setbacks Front: N/A Druid Road: 88.3 feet(to building)
15 feet(to pavement) X1
Bypass Dr.: 90.2 feet(to building)
19 feet(to pavement) X'
Side: N/A West: 10 feet(to building) X�
4.5 feet(to pavement)
North: 0 feet(to building) X�
0 feet(to pavement)
Minimum Off-Street Parking 3 spaces/i,000sf GFA 4.79 spaces/1,OOOsf GFA X
46 arkin s aces 73 arkin s aces
� See analysis in Staff Report.
Community Development Board—October 18,2011
FLD2011-07026—Page 5
COMPLIANCE WITH FLEXIBILITY CRITERIA:
The following table depicts the consistency of the development proposal with the Flexibility
criteria as per CDC Section 2-1004.B. (Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project):
Consistent Inconsistent
1. The development or redevelopment is otherwise impractical without deviations from X
the use and/or development standards set forth in this zoning district.
2. The development or redevelopment will be consistent with the goals and policies of X
the Comprehensive Plan, as well as with the general purpose, intent and basic
planning objectives of this Code, and with the intent and purpose of this zoning
district.
3. The development or redevelopment will not impede the normal and orderly X
development and improvement of surrounding properties.
4. Adjoining properties will not suffer substantial detriment as a result of the proposed X
development.
5. The proposed use shall otherwise be permitted by the underlying future land use X
category, be compatible with adjacent land uses, will not substantially alter the
essential use characteristics of the neighborhood; and shall demonstrate compliance
with one or more of the following objectives:
a. The proposed use is permitted in this zoning district as a minimum standard,
flexible standard or flexible development use;
b. The proposed use would be a significant economic contributor to the City's
economic base by diversifying the local economy or by creating jobs;
c. The development proposal accommodates the expansion ar redevelopment of an
existing economic contributor;
d. The proposed use provides for the provision of affordable housing;
e. The proposed use provides for development or redevelopment in an area that is
characterized by other similar development and where a land use plan amendment
and rezoning would result in a spot land use or zoning designation;or
£ The proposed use provides for the development of a new and/or preservation of a
working waterfront use.
6. Flexibiliry with regard to use, lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street X
parking are justified based on demonstrated compliance with all of the following
design objectives:
a. The proposed development will not impede the normal and orderly development
and improvement of the surrounding properties for uses permitted in this zoning
district;
b. The proposed development complies with applicable design guidelines adopted
by the City;
c. The design, scale and intensity of the proposed development supports the
established or emerging character of an area;
d. In order to form a cohesive, visually interesting and attractive appearance, the
proposed development incorporates a substantial number of the following design
elements:
❑ Changes in horizontal building planes;
❑ Use of architectural details such as columns,cornices,stringcourses,pilasters,
porticos,balconies,railings,awnings,etc.;
❑ Variety in materials,colors and textures;
❑ Distinctive fenestration patterns;
❑ Building stepbacks;and
❑ Distinctive roofs forms.
e. The proposed development provides for appropriate buffers, enhanced landscape
desi n and a ro riate distances between buildin s.
Community Development Board—October 18,2011
FLD2011-07026—Page 6
COMPLIANCE WITH GENERAL STANDARDS FOR LEVEL TWO APPROVALS:
The following table depicts the consistency of the development proposal with the General
Standards for Level Two Approvals as per CDC Section 3-914.A:
Consistent Inconsistent
1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, X
coverage,density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located.
2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage development and use of X
adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof.
3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons X
residing or working in the neighborhood.
4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. X
5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the X
immediate vicinity.
6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including X
visual,acoustic and olfacto and hours of o eration im acts on ad'acent ro erties.
SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION:
The Development Review Committee (DRC) reviewed the application and supporting materials
at its meeting of September 1, 2011, and deemed the development proposal to be legally
sufficient to move forward to the Community Development Board (CDB), based upon the
following:
Findings of Fact. The Planning and Development Department, having reviewed all evidence
submitted by the applicant and requirements of the Community Development Code, finds that
there is substantial competent evidence to support the following findings of fact:
1. That the 1.52 acre subject property is located at the northwest corner of Bypass Drive and
Druid Road;
2. That the subject property is located within the Office (0) District and the Residential/Office
General (R/OG) Future Land Use Plan category;
3. The site currently contains 15,247 square feet of office space;
4. The minimum required structural setbacks are all being met with the exception of the side
(north) setback where the existing building is located on the property;
5. The proposal includes a setback reduction to proposed pavement;
6. The proposal includes a reduction to the perimeter landscape buffer requirement along the
west property line from five feet to 4.5 feet;
7. The proposal includes 73 parking spaces;
8. The existing building height is 22 feet; and
9. There is no outstanding Code Enforcement issue associated with the subject property.
Conclusions of Law. The Planning and Development Department, having made the above
findings of fact, reaches the following conclusions of law:
1. That the development proposal is consistent with the Standards as per Tables 2-1001.1. and
2-1004 of the Community Development Code;
2. That the development proposal is consistent with the Flexibility criteria as per Section 2-
1004.B of the Community Development Code;
Community Development Board—October 18,2011
FLD2011-07026—Page 7
3. That the development proposal is consistent with the General Standards for Level Two
Approvals as per Section 3-914.A of the Community Development Code; and
4. The development proposal is consistent with the Flexibility criteria as per Section 3-1202.G
of Community Development Code.
Based upon the above, the Planning and Development Department recommends APPROVAL of
the Flexible Development application to permit the addition of 20 off-street parking spaces for an
existing 15,247 square foot office building in the Office (0) District with a lot area of 66,211
square feet (1.52 acres), a lot width of 152 feet (along Druid Road) and 438 feet (along Bypass
Drive), a building height of 22 feet, a front (south) setback of 19 feet (to proposed pavement) and
90.2 feet (to existing building), a front (east) setback of 15 feet (to proposed pavement) and 88.3
feet (to existing building), a side (west) setback of 4.5 feet (to proposed pavement) and 9.9 feet
(to existing building), a side (north) setback of zero feet (to existing building and pavement), and
73 parking spaces as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project under the provisions of
Community Development Code Section 2-1004.B.; as well as a reduction to the west landscape
buffer from five feet to 4.5 feet as a Comprehensive Landscape Program under the provisions of
Community Development Code Section 3-1202.G., subject to the following conditions:
Conditions of Approval:
1. That a building permit be obtained for the parking lot improvements and landscaping;
2. That, all proposed landscape material be installed prior to the issuance of a certificate of
completion; and
3. That the parking requirement in the site data table be corrected to reflect 46 required parking
spaces rather than 42.
n
Prepared by Planning and Development Department Staff: � C,C�'=
A. Scott Kurleman, Planner III
ATTACHMENTS:Location Map;Aerial Map;Zoning Map;Existing Surrounding Uses Map;and Photographs of Site and Viciniry
Community Development Board—October 18,2011
FLD2011-07026—Page 8
��� � ` �� �/
: ,
.....___.__._.__�. , �� j
� . � R�.
1
! �� ♦
.� 1� b u ... � ,
�-A ��`•� u , ��� ..
'w`�'k . � � .�
�. .. ...,,et^ ..
t..�
..�
S � "Y�, ���. .. �.
t e�f `�. �y,
� ��,,��� �„�ysg 1ka � raw ��
'�� �-�"� '' . �, a�+= �.
rt ,�`�b��^�''Y` c t� ;; . ' `'} .7" ' , .
H F.� , .?Br� . �4k �. . •:s:J- . '�.. .... .a ... �. . ._..., �.....
Looking northeast from Druid Road Looking west from Druid Road
F ` § fl. ���� i,
� �^�� �,' b �t
YY. .�+: � �6 . A
1 }
..
,� v-�._....... ,- `�
� .
�.:,u��a� � ' �t ��. : ��{ ��. tl
i� _� i �� 1�►1► _;�, �.
��� � � �a
... Y. `.°°°__ • y,x.t.fi.
';."°e�
.� ,
� ��'�
� �
, .
_... � ... � . .�.
�__ '^ �
._...__ _. , , .
�� ..._. � � � , �' ��� �r
.....:_.._ _._ -_..: � ,. ,
�.�,
� :,, ti
yi1h,� . �.. #S§tlw~�'.. ' t 4 b�y➢i+L ..
4���� - .d�Yll��' ua, . .. . yx "4�.:'.��4 �, y'a..:w`?�
,� ' �_ �� � �
�" ,� �� � . f",
�tt :' ��� �.,1 � .. #t �''� �#Fx3�"n=l
�, � y' . � hi` .. _r.t..�!s.Ac .*r##.f�W � «a°�i8�-d !, ,_._ _..�......._... �,.,rv.�.
Looking south across Druid Road East side of subject building
: �,_ �s�.;' � . , �, � � �� ,. ' _ -
.. �,� t. �X�.4+iYbF i �. � c^� :.� ^�..> � _. � ..
y.,k +' �� , .,,� a
t:.��,� �� � °�� y�f �s�+`,�� i
. ,y F '""�'•�'�- � � '�..;.,.. � t� r
y� 4 �/
.. y ..J'` ,�R1 � �,�
K: �� �` .++ �� � . A !
�+�° � �dl'Cil��' ,��_r �� ��I� ��4 l!
T� ��:.,
- ���• �� �� k � •. ,._
.
I t� �-•r�1s?`r�i�� ' ��
r ,
�► : •v.
. _.��,
,.a
a+L�pyy♦r � �. j F :��"S�"i" ��y�X� , . .�
4'""�" .{.` �.� �.. �.?fk'� .._ Fl
. ��..� kY �• �y}. ,..ry �,. . , " ro4�i,paCA,.jf�_W�¢d.yi'�
}�a
�c` �'"�3 i# �.y�{
� � r�.YJ.«' l,�t'"Y' �� t f��`�� r.1'., . 1 �, �
,,.� w... . Y"iY17`f�a�" ,.. ., r..�.W.i�« ..{._ . �'•, f."'+ `t � _ ' . . .
Existing landscape buffer along Bypass Drive Retention area on the subject site
622 & 628 Bypass Drive
FLD2011-07026
Page 1 of 1
� , , , �� a ; $,. i,� � � ^ ^ ' � `�' �::
,a � , 4 � .�'s1 #' � s � �9-, .fl. , �
A �:: . - ^ � �- �
i i i � � � � � � �
�� � i i �,, � I � � � o
� � � �
� '1 � � � � s � . � .�
�A 1 � , , , �r a � �' ; I
, •, , , , �, .."� _�-�
, , , , , ' ' - � , .,
1 l l 7 '1 { , � 'w .� ':R, -a -� � �
� 7 � � ' l l , ,;��� j� � � :•.1
3
!J �
i i i i i � i 4-
. �
� .
.-�." -„—� ' `�
�` I *� ,., � � � "—�.: . _
._ `,'��. . -'i:�.._. ..—.;�.-•.
- ` _n �
i ,}���
� � '. �'y. � �X 4
.
. � �} � � ,,., .., , .,
� ..�j� „ � � „ �%�
.44'i , �{}Y 11 .�',
{;!
�fi . #�� ... __
� f� - :���. ��
N s" �I � �
�� � .. .
;� ��
,� ;, �
i��� `4:'fk�° I
' � ,
� , .a' �
� �. -�r_ . - � �... .,._ ,
x �� � • ,.t;�r.
i� , � f, � �,�,�e4 �
r.y:: ;���•� �* _. . �, ./+�/ =•.
l � �� "��, ' ,/ +y r
•4 i . . . . � _ _ , a -� � .. .. " ,. ' _ o � ie�•. � .... ..
, �
j� � , '
; ,' ` i"L�l' � � " ,� � :��� ' �� ��
, ,
, ; �
_, , ..
�., t � � ,,,:
�< ,(,,�,� ..C%f! �
���_'.'�....�.,�, "{ dy�,:..
��~� n t��^/ ��` .e!
M1 �a �� � 'kf�.'4 � � l, j
t �/ � ���� �°�:� � .k4 � �4' .z, :'�� �',
/�,�5 i � j. ��S :�,. , ,
f + [ �' Y,. '� �4a � I
' i � / `.,�'3�{. "x � '. �, '� �ti ,:y r j.� i
�I� ' �, f� j ; d��' '� ti "" �
� F� �;!tiiL- �
i , J k ' .
/ ,
�� „ ; '„/, x. K
/ / ;
f � ` � ; r 1
� ,»! ��: }X 5 ;
, �� , . , � ,:. .
.
, ,
t¢� -',� f ' r � 1 ' �� , �' }� ti Y��t� �i�
,% � / ' � . .. /j .�.�:� k Y� t �'' .f. �' y;�.i �- .�1'
f � �:ti c . -- ,,• �,r
, �¢
�� r . . - s„ �.� �.o .�F",4''
' j. (� r xlF � g l
/. •� �i�i� � 1� � �✓. _ � .
,
���� � " 9l1� ',� / } ��� t �r- � � �� � � L
i �� ...
i
i /> ,:���f/ ,�.� �'�a �"« �' I ,�.+�.x �
� l >>��. n ' �/ �
1' �' (
AERIAL MAP
Owner: Thomas W. Carey, Trustee of the T& L Trust Case: FLD201 1-07026
Site: 622 8� 628 Bypass Drive Property Size: 1.52 Acres
PIN: 18-29-16-12932-000-0050 Atlas Page: 299B
18-29-16-12932-000-0020
A c cc> ' �
�.a�� ' .e., ` airoe a v
t
4.'-�• .' 800 ° a
r.``..`,;-`'° ° 1.03 Ac r_ _ � i z
r o°,� $
�:� " RETAIL SALES AND �
� � � '.. ,` SERVICES
�•.••�'•�•�_` ,: `� . �
�.',`�'.;��"d,�va,: .,.. .
p�•,• OFFICF,S
��, 0 3.5.`Q.b��>.' -
�::' � �. '�'`"� `• .'•..:. 2 822
� '��� -
�, PROGRESS v+ 3 � �
� ENERGY � VACANT
TRANS�1ISSION 4 � � I 0
LINES. - _L� y
��e a
r: .. . 5 �.
. � - - — m
� �, , � � 6 828
• ains
m K3 cp2 m1 . •.•.ao• — —
5 N N N N '.. •`N.:. . . 7 �.24
. �
DRUID RD
• • .I' • �'_� ^ R.,B.
. ° � �� ••c�°e' � ' � � ^ I
.��. . e�:.�•••.�. I h _ N O h
, A N � � 41A4 N
, : ... , = ATTACtiED L1984* � ; 6°�0
'' -• . � ' DWELLING
avoi y �. ``�` " . 2 a
�. . mA�,•� aaroz
�. . � '.. . 2�3 3 ,
� n " '.� O
. , r— —
° � ° � • ( 80353
,. , � .. , 2
�� .. y .. v �4
EXISTING SURROUNDING USES MAP
Owner: Thomas W. Carey, Trustee of the T& L Trust Case: FLD201 1-07026
Site: 622 & 628 Bypass Drive Property Size: 1.52 Acres
PIN: 18-29-16-12932-000-0050 Atlas Page: 2998
18-29-16-12932-000-0020
°" . �
" ; , soo " �
° z a
C „ . C
� ' 620
. "�" -N-f'/
° � s • sz2*
, i
.. �� e �
.. .. , *�
' --i�
- °:' iQ
� i*a
$�
e� � ' O 628*m
� � R � ��� .��y�.;�:: �.. i O
N N N N •f ,•�`L *
EE!-H�
I
, � . -.a�� . 25a5 � N MDR� --
• � +�+•e' ` 2509 N N
` °..• '.` • =' ° ° 2 513 �
2517
e. ,,',�,•`�`°`- e°.''°.•,�'•� `u 2521
I2481 . • ' • �e •L c 2525
I [ ' . 2529
.`�`. '• • . .
I . . ,. R p --
. _I,.s .` .
2541
�
.. �. �., .�. :. .. �.. MHP
�•2as�a. ' ` , � •
ZONING MAP
Owner: Thomas W. Carey,Trustee of the T8� L Trust Case: FLD201 1-07026
Site: 622 8� 628 Bypass Drive Property Size: 1.52 Acres
PIN: 18-29-16-12932-000-0050 Atlas Page: 299B
18-29-16-12932-000-0020
iR w � ,^
•---.
sl�m�e:..�'.:�;,.�1 _._::�
wasra o �
sr y e
5
u� w � Q
ST a ¢ � �
ui WHtTMAPI ST
> �
a Z w
S� � W � CHAUCER ST
� � Y
st z
w SHELLEY ST �
a
a
SR-60
� m, o PROJECT
�� F�:�. '! � `� SITE
._i. �'� �''�°�
1 ��� . •,� W �:•` -� �,
l .•�� . .I a 4` •� >
j :: ���� �`�.
r.DRl11D•'::.'.= t�..-■.e RD
�� . .. .,.,. �,� > w ; i
€'�'•1 r > @:'_`"'°"''�� � v-'��
�, �•� W W E 9, • SEVILLE BLVD
a - 'RD 3 �.:.�...�.. .�., ..•��
� � � � � �
w �
> J W f �
° Z �° s��� � Pearce pr
¢
U �� �:�.m
� 8����E �R ❑a
�
� a > ; > ; > ; � ✓
a a Q Q a a a ��
GLENMOOR
w W 7ROPIC MLLS DR ^ �
Q =� O � > ��
DRNE � � z c¢i ¢ �
z
w
a o � �
tiF z W � �
y
LOCATION MAP
Owner: Thomas W. Carey, Trustee of the T8� L Trust Case: FLD2011-07026
Site: 622 8� 628 Bypass Drive Property Size: 1.52 Acres
PIN: 18-29-16-12932-000-0050 Atlas Page: 299B
18-29-16-12932-000-0020
A. Scott Kurleman
100 South Myrtle Avenue
Clearwater,FL 33756
727-562-4553
scott.kurleman(cr�,mvclearwater.com
PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE
■ Planner III
City of Clearwater, Clearwater, Florida August 2008 to Present
Duties include performing the technical review and preparation of staff reports for various land
development applications, assist public customers at the Zoning Counter,the organization of data and
its display in order to track information and provide status reports and making presentations to
various City Boards and Committees.
■ Planner II
City of Clearwater, Clearwater, Florida June 2005 to August 2008
Duties include performing the technical review and preparation of staff reports for various land
development applications, the organization of data and its display in order to track information and
provide status reports. Assist public customers at the Zoning Counter. Review Building Permits, Sign
Permits, Business Tax Receipts, and Landscape Plans as well as Comprehensive Sign Program
Applications.
■ Land Resource Specialist
City of Clearwater, Clearwater, Florida June 1996 to June 2005
Coordinates with City Legal Department to initiate legal proceedings for non-compliance with City
land resource regulations. Landscape re-inspection program. Plans and directs program to ensure
that plant material installed per the approved landscape plan remains in a healthy growing condition
in perpetuity and restores deficient landscaped with new plant material. Certificate of Occupancy
Inspection. Perform inspections with contractors, owners, and City departments to monitor the
installation of required landscape material per an approved site plan. Process tree permits ensuring
that regulations governing the removal criteria are followed. Provide technical tree evaluations for
structural defects, hazards, proper pruning, and identification for trees on public and private
properties.
■ Account Manager
Cherry Lake Farms, IMG Enterprise, Inc. Groveland, Florida June 1993 to June 1996
Supervised and managed existing territory accounts, while handling a strategic marketing plan.
Planned and directed in-field inspection program for landscape architects, municipalities and private
corporations. Prepared technical training modules for corporate employees and customers regarding
arboricultural techniques related to trees.
■ Licensed Marketing Representative
Allstate Insurance Company, Clearwater, Florida June 1991 to June 1993
Field inspections of insured structures.Policy service and account maintenance.
■ Store Manager
William Natorp Company, Inc. Cincinnati Ohio June 1983 to June 1991
Managed a team of 20 sales people and sales associates in a landscape center. Responsible for teams
of employees including but not limited to payroll,budgeting, sales, store and equipment maintenance,
workplace safety, and advertising. Managed outdoor staff, merchandised and cared for all outdoor
products. Responsible for all indoor staff and horticultural products.
EDUCATION
GRADUATE—Certificate: Communitv Development, UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHFLORIDA,
TAMPA, FLORIDA. Currently pursuing.
BS in Sustainability Management,ST. PETERSBURG COLLEGE, FLORIDA.
Currently pursuing.
BA in Business Administration,ST. LEO UNIVERSI7'Y, ST. LEO,FLORIDA.
Graduated July,2002 Cum Laude.Major: Management
AA in Business Administration,ST. PETERSBURG COLLEGE, FLORIDA.
Graduated 1998. Major: Management.
AS in Ornamental Horticulture, OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY,WOOSTER,
Graduated 1984 Cum Laude. Major: Horticulture Technology with emphasis in
Arboriculture.
ISA, International Society of Arboriculture, Certified Arborist,FL-0414
LEED Green Associate, Currently pursuing
MOTIVATIONAL Mentor Award,December 2010
�, Planning Department CASE#:
learwater 100 South Myrtle Avenue RECEIVED BY(staff initials):
.- � Clearwater, Florida 33756 DATE RECEIVED:
Telephone:727-562-4567
Fax: 727-562-4865
O SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION
❑ SUBMIT 14 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION-Plans and
application are required to be collated,stapled,and folded into sets
❑ SUBMIT FIRE PRELIMARY SITE PLAN:a200.O0
❑ SUBMIT APPLICATION FEE$ 1,405.00
* NOTE:15 TOTAL SETS OF INFORMATION REQUIRED (APPLICATIONS PLUS SITE PLAN SETS)
FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION
(Revised 07/i l/2008)
�PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT�
A. APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A)
APPLICANT NAME: Thomas W.Carey,Trustee of the T 8�L Land Trust
MAILING ADDRESS: 622 Bypass Drive,Suite 100 Clearwater,FL 33764
PHONE NUMBER: 727-799-3900 FAX NUMBER: 727-231-0869
CELL NUMBER: EMAIL: donna@tcarey.com
PROPERTY OWNER(S): Thomas W.Carey,Trustee of the T&L Land Trust
List ALL ovmers on the deed
AGENT NAME: Synergy Civil Engineering, Inc.(Michael J. Palmer)
MAILING ADDRESS: 3000 Gulf to Bay Bivd.,Suite 201 Clearwater,
PHONE NUMBER: 727-7gg-�g2g FAX NUMBER:
CELL NUMBER: EMAIL: m lamer s ner civilen .com
B. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4202.A)
PROJECT NAME: Carey 8�Leisure Law(Parking Addition) PROJECT VALUATION: $ 80,000.00
STREET ADDRESS 622 Bypass Drive,Suite 100 Clearwater,FL 33764
PARCEL NUMBER(S): 18-29-16-12932-000-0050 8�18-29-16-12932-000-0020
PARCEL SIZE(acres): 1.52 PARCEL SIZE(square feet): 66,211
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Portion of Bypass Park Tract recorded in Plat Book 92,page 2
PROPOSED USE(S): Commercial(Parking Lot)
DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST: Reduction in front yard setback from 25 ft to 19 ft&side yard set back from 10 ft to 4.5 ft to
Specifically identify the request a�tlow a c1i i na�ff�tre�t pa�king. ----
(include number of units or square - —
footage of non-residential use and all.
requested code deviations;e.g.
reduction in required number of
parking spaces,specific use,etc.)
C:1DocumeMS and Settings\derek.fergusonlDesktoplplanning dept forms 0708\Fle�tible Development(FLD)ZODB 07-11.doc
Page 1 of 7
DOES THIS APPLICATION INVOLVE THE TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS (TDR), A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED PLANNED UNIT
DEVELOPMENT,OR A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED(CERTIFIED)SITE PLAN? YES_ NO X (if yes,attach a copy of the applicable documents)
C. PROOF OF OWNERSHIP: (Code Section 4202.A.5)
�SUBMIT A COPY OF THE TITLE INSURANCE POLICY,DEED TO THE PROPERTY OR SIGN AFFIDAVIT ATTESTING OWNERSHIP
(see page 7)
D. WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS:(Code Section 3-913.A)
Pi Provide complete responses to the six(6)GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA—Explain how each criteria is achieved,in detail:
1. The proposed development of the land will be in hartnony with the scale,bulk,coverage,density and character of adjacent properties in which it is
located.
The proposed parkinq(22 Stalls)and dry retention pond modification will be located adjacent to Bypass Drive 8�the Power
Company and will be landscaped to buffer the view from adjacent properties.The proposed development will not adversely
icnpact-#kie-cbaracte � 9-��e-Pa�p9-o�-�Pa=�n"�.°
2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or signficantiy
impair the value thereof.
The proposed development will be located within the interior property of the existing 1.52 acre commercial complex and will
not impa e eve opmen o a �acen prope �es or ui mgs.
3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety or persons residing or working in the neighborfiood of the proposed use.
The proposed development will improve the circulation of emergency vehides by reducing the likelihood of vehicle parking
on ypass nve, us improv�ng ea an sa e issues re a e o emergency ve ic e circu ation.
4. The proposed development is designed to minim¢e traffic congestion.
The proposed development will reduce the likelihood of vehicle parking on Bypass Drive,thus minimizing traffic
�ngestion.
5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development.
The proposed development has been designed to be a harmonious continuation of the existing parking area. The
wall on site for the proposed retaining wall adjacent to the proposed parking area.
6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects,induding visual,acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts,on
adjacent properties.
The proposed development minimizes adverse effects by reducing the likelih�od of vehicles to park on Bypass Drive,the
incorporation of additional landscaping and use of existing materials on the existing site(matching existing retaining wall)will
'g�{pr�that thP nrnoncPrt narkinn araa anrl m 'nn nn�nrl will
be under construction for 30-90 days so that visual,acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation are minimally impacted.
C:1Documents and SetlingslderekfergusonlDesktoplplanning dept forms 07081Fle�dble Development(FLD)2008 07-11.doc
Page 2 of 7
WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS:(Flexibility Criteria)
❑ Provide complete responses to the applipble flexibility criteria for the specfic Use as listed in each Zoning District to which the waiver is
requested(use separate sheets as necessary)—E�lain how each criteria is achieved,in detail:
E. STORMWATER PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (City of Clearvvater Storm Drainage Design Criteria
Manual and 4202.A.27)
I�f A STORMWATER NARRATNE MUST BE SUBMIITED WITH ALL APPLICATIONS.All applications that invoive addition
or modification of impervious surface, induding buildings, must include a stormwater plan that demonstrates compliance with the City of
Clearvvater Storm Drainage Design Criteria manual.A reduction in impervious surface area does not qualify as an exemption to this requirement
❑ If a plan is not required,the narrative shail provide an explanation as to why the site is exempt
❑ At a minimum,the STORMWATER PLAN shall include the following;
❑ Existing topography extending 50 feet beyond all property lines;
❑ Proposed grading induding finished floor elevations of all structures;
❑ All adjacent streets and municipal storm systems;
❑ Proposed stormwater detentioNreten6on area including top of bank,toe of slope and outlet control structure;
� A nartative describing the proposed stortnwater control plan induding all calculations and data necessary to demonstrate�mpiiance with
the City manual.
❑ Proposed stormwater detentionlreterrtion area including top of bank,toe of sbpe and outlet control structure;
❑ Signature and seal of Florida Registered Professional Engineer on all plans and calculations.
� COPY OF PERMIT INQUIRY LETTER OR SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT (SWFWMD} PERMIT
SUBMITTAL(SWFWMD approval is required prior to issuance of City Building Permit),ff applipble
❑ ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF STORMWATER PLAN REQUIREMENTS(Applicant must initial one of the following):
�
� Stortnwater plan as noted above is induded
Stormwater plan is not required and explanation narrative is attached. At a minimum, a grading plan and finished floor
elevations shall be provided.
CAUTION — IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A STORMWATER PLAN
AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED,APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY
MAY OCCUR.
If you have questions regarding these requirements,contact the City Public Worics Administration Engineering Department at(727)562-4750.
F. SUPPLEMENTAL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 4202.A)
� SIGNED AND SEALED SURVEY(induding legal description of property)—One originai and 14 copies;
Q TREE SURVEY (inciuding existing trees on site and within 25'of the adjacent site,by speaes,size(DBH 4"or greater),and location,
including drip lines and indicating trees to be removed)—please design around the existing trees;
Q TREE INVENTORY; prepared by a "certified arborisY, of all trees 4° DBH or greater, reflecting size, qnopy (drip lines) and
condition of such trees;.
� LOCATION MAP OF THE PROPERTY;
❑ PARKING DEMAND STUDY in conjunction with a request to make deviations to the parking standarcls (ie. Reduce number of spaces).
Prior to the submittal of this applica6on,the methodology of such study shall be approved by the Community Development Coordinator and
shall be in accordance with accepted traffic engineering prinaples. The findings of the study wiit be used in determining whether or not
deviations to the parlcing standards are approved;N/A
� GRADING PLAN,as applicable;
� PRELIMINARY PLAT,as required(Note: Building permits wili not be issued until evidence of recording a final plat is provided);N/A
� COPY OF RECORDED PLAT,as applicable;N/A
C:�Documents and SeUingslderek.fargusron\Desktop�plannirg dept forms 07081Fle�dble DevelopmeM(FLD)2008 07-11.dx
Page 3 of 7
G. SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4202.A)
� SITE PLAN witfi the following information(not to exceed 24'x 36'�:
X Index sheet referencing individual sheets induded in package;
X North arrow;
X Engineering bar scale(minimum scale one inch equals 50 feet),and date prepared;
X All dimensions;
X Footprint and size of all EXISTING buildings and structures;
N/A Footprint and s¢e of all PROPOSED buildings and structures;
X All required setbacks;
X All existing and proposed points of access;
X All required sight triangles;
Identification of environmentally unique areas, such as watercourses, wetlands, tree masses, and speamen trees, induding
N/A description and loqtion of understory,ground cover vegetation and wildliFe habitats,etc;Location of all public and private easements;
X Location of all street rights-of-way within and adjacent to the s'ite;
Location of e�dsting pubiic and private utilities,induding fire hydrants,storm and sanitary sewer lines,manholes and lift sta6ons,gas
X and water lines;
X All parking spaces,driveways,loading areas and vehicular use areas;
X Depiction by shading or crosshatching of all required pariting bt interior landspped areas;
X Location of all solid waste containers,recyciing or trash handling areas and outside mechanical equipment and ali required screening
_ {per Section 3-201(D)(i)and Index#701};
X Location of atl landscape material;
X Location of ail onsite and offsite storm-water management faalities;
X Location of all outdoor lighting fixtures;
X Location of all existing and proposed sidewalks;and
Floor plan typicals of buildings for ali Level Two approvals. A floor pian of each floor is required for any parking garage requiring a
N/A Level Two approval.
� SITE DATA TABLE for existing,required,and proposed deveiopment,in wiitten/tabular form:
EXISTiNG REQUIRED PROPOSED
X Land area in square feet and acres; 66,211/1.52 10,000/0.23 66,211/1.52
N/A Number of EXISTING dweliing units;
N/A Number of PROPOSED dwelling units;
N/A Gross floor area devoted to each use; �f
X Parking spaces: total number, presented in tabular form with the
_ number of required spaces; 57 off street �ofF street 79 off street
X Total paved area, induding all paved parking spaces 8�driveways, 26,510/40% 49,658/75% 29,959/45%
_ expressed in square feet 8�percentage of the paved vehicular area;
Official records book and page numbers of ail existing u6lity
N/A easement;
N/A Building and structure heights;
X ImpeRneabie surface ratio(I.S.R.);and 0_400 0.750 0.452
WA Floor area ratio(F.A.R.)for all nonresidential uses.
� REDUCED COLOR SITE PLAN to scale(8'h X 11);
� FOR DEVELOPMENTS OVER ONE ACRE,provide the following additional information on site plan: N/A
_ One-foot contours or spot elevations on site;
_ Offsite eleva6ons'rf required to evaluate the proposed stormwater management for the parcel;
_ All open space areas;
_ Location of all earth or water retaining walls and earth berms;
_ Lot lines and building lines(dimensioned);
_ Streets and drives(dimensioned):
Building and structural setbacks(dimensioned);
_ Structural overhangs;
C:Wocuments and SetlingsWerekferguson\Desktop�plenning deptfortns 0706\Fle�dble Developmetrt(FLD)2006 07-11.doc
Page 4 of 7
H. LANDSCAPING PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 41102.A)
� LANDSCAPE PLAN with the following infortnation(not to exceed 24°x 36'�:
X All e�tisting and proposed structures;
X Names of abutting streets;
X Drainage and retention areas inGuding swales,side slopes and bottom elevations;
X Delineation and dimensions of all required perimeter landscape buffers;
X Sight visibility triangles;
X Delineation and dimensions of all parking areas inGuding landscaping islands and curbing;
X Existing trees on-site and immediately adjacent to the site,by species,size and locations,induding dripiines(as indicated on required
_ tree survey);
X Location, s¢e, and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, indiqted by a key relating to the plant
schedule;
X Plant schedule with a key(symbol or label)indicating the size,description,specifications,quantities,and spaang requirements of all
existing and proposed landscape materials,including botanical and common names;
X Typical planting details for trees,palms, shrubs and ground cover plants inGuding instructions,soii mixes, badcfilling, mulching and
_ protective measures;
X Interior landscaping areas hatched and/or shaded and labeled and interior landscape coverage, expressing in both square feet and
_ percentage covered;
N/A Conditions of a previous development approval(e.g.conditions imposed by the Community Development Board);
X Irrigation notes.
� REDUCED COLOR LANDSCAPE PLAN to scale(8'/�X 11);
� COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM appiication, as applicable. Landscape assoaated with the Comprehensive Landscape
Program shall exceed minimum Code requirements to offset the areas where minimum Code wili not be met
I. BUILDING ELEVATION PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4202.A.23)
� BUILDING ELEVATION DRAWINGS—with the following infortnation; N/A
Ail sides of all buildings;
Dimensioned;
Colors(provide one full sized set of colored elevations);
Materials;
� REDUCED BUILDING ELEVATIONS—same as above to scale on 8%Z X 11. N/A
J. SIGNAGE: (Division 19. SIGNS/Section 3-1806) N/A
❑ All EXISTING freestanding and attached signs; Provide photographs and dimensions (area, height, etc.), indicate whether they will be
removed or to remain.
❑ Ail PROPOSED freestanding and attached signs; Provide details including location, s¢e, height, colors, materials and drawing;
freestanding signs shall inciude the street address(numerals)
� Comprehensive Sign Program application,as applicable(separate applica6on and fee required).
� Reduced signage proposal(8%:X 11) (color),if submitting Comprehensive Sign Program applica6on.
C:WocumenLS and Seffings\derakferguson\Dasktop\planning dept tortns 07081Flebble DevalopmeM(RD)2008 07-11.doc
Page 5 of 7
K. TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY: (Section 4202.A.13 and 4-801.C) N/A
� Indude if required by the Traffic Operations Manager or hislher designee or'rf the proposed development:
• Will degrade the acceptabie level of service for any roadway as adopted in the Comprehensive Plan.
■ Will generate 100 or more new vehicle directional trips per hour and/or 1000 or more new vehicle trips per day.
• Will affect a nearby roadway segment and/or intersection with five(5)reportable accidents within the prior twelve(12)month period or
that is on the City's annual list of most hazardous intersections.
Trip generation shall be based on the most recent edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineers(ITE)Trip General Manual.
The Traffic impact Study must be prepared in accordance with a `Scoping Meeting' held with the Traffic Operations Manager and the
Planning DepaRment's Development Review Manager or their designee(727-562-4750)
Refer to Section 4-801 C of the Community Development Code for exceptions to this requirement.
� Acknowledgement of traffic impact study requirements(Applipnt must initial one of the foliowing):
Traffic impact Study is induded.The study must inGude a summary table of pre-and post-development levels of service for all
roadway legs and each tuming movement at all intersections identified in the Scoping Meeting.
,l" Traffic Impact Study is not required.
CAUTION—IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY
AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED,APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY
MAY OCCUR.
If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Pubiic Works Administration Engi�eering Departrnent at(727)562-
4750.
L. FIRE FLOW CALCULATIONS/WATER STUDY: N/A
Provide Fire Flow Calcutations.Water Study by a FIRE PROTECTION ENGINEER to assure an adequate water supply is available and to detertnine if
any upgrades are required by the devebper due to the impact of this project The water supply must be abie to support the needs of any required fire
sprinkler,standpipe and/or fire pump. If a fire pump is required the water suppiy must be able to supply 150%of its rated capacity. Compliance with
the 2004 Florida Fire Prevention Code to include NFPA 13,MFPA 14,NFPA 20,NFPA 291,and MFPA 1142(Annex H)is required.
� Adcnowledgement of fire flow calculations/water study requirements(Applicant must initial one of the following):
Fire Flow Calculations/Water Study is included.
�—'�s- Fire Flow CalculationsNllater Study is not required.
CAUTION — IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A FIRE FLOW
CALCULATIONS/ WATER STUDY AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED; APPLICATION MUST BE
RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR.
if you have questions regarding these requirements,contact the City Fire Prevention Department at(72�562-4334.
M. SIGNATURE:
I,the undersigned,acknowledge that all representations made STATE OF FLORIDA,COUNTY OF PINELLA��
in this application are true and accurate to the best of my Swom � and s scribed before me this��"day of
knowledge and author¢e City representatives to visit and ,A.D.20L�to me and/or by
photograph the prope e "bed' thi pl' on. is pe nally known has
p uced
` asidentification --• �--
� ��►RY";'-; SHARON LOUISE JACK ON
�� Y CONIMISSION#DD7 709
�"Notary public, ' GXPIRES Februa 03 12
S i g n a t u r e o f p ro p e o w n e r o r r e p r e s e n t a t i v e '•?o s y,�,:�` ry �
Mycommissionexpires: �����
(40T)398-0153 FloridalloarySarvice.com
C:1Documents and Setlings\derek.fergusonlDesktopVp�anning dept fomu 07081Flexible Development(FLD)2006 07-11.doc
Page 6 of 7
N. AFFIDAVIT TO AUTHORIZE AGENT:
1. Provide names of all property owners on deed—PRINT full names:
Thomas W.Carey,Trustee of the T&L Land Trust
2. That(I am/we are)the owner(s)and record tiUe holder(s)of the fo0owing described property(address or general location):
622&628 Bypass Drive,Suite 100 Clearwater,FL 33764
3. That this property constitutes the property for which a request for a:(describe request)
Construction of 22 Additional Off-Street Parking Stalls
4. That the undersigned(has/have)appointed and(doesldo)appoint:
Synergy Civil Engineering,Inc.(Michael J. Palmer)
as(his/their)agent(s)to execute any petitions or other documents necessary to affect such petition;
5. That this affidavit has been executed to induce the City of Clearwater,Florida to consider and act on the above described property;
6. That site visits to the property are necessary by Ciry representatives in order to process this appiication and the owner authorizes City
representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application;
7. That(I/ ),the rsigned authority,hereby certify that the foregoing is true and correct.
roperty Owner Property Owner
Property Owner Property Ovmer
STATE OF FLORIDA,
COUNTY OF PINELLAS
Before me the undersigned,an o�cer duly commissioned by the laws of the State of Florida,on this �� day of
, �li�� personally appeared i7�ZdU� ���/��Id���o having been first duly swom
Depos and says that he/she fully understands the contents of the affidavit that hefshe signed.
NOTARY PUBLIC-STATE Or^FfARIDA
�""'°- Diane Darby Griffin
`� :Commission#DD831895
y�,�-•`Espires: OCT.16,2012 i
BUNDED'1�ltIIATT.ANTtCBONnI�GCa,II1G Notary Publ' 3i ature
Notary Seat/Stamp My Commission Expires:
C:1Dowments and Settings�derek.ferguson\Desktoplplanning dept forms 0708\Flexible Development(FLD)2008 07•11.doc
Page 7 of 7
i
• CASE NUMBER:
LL Planning Department
° � ����� 100 South M rtle Avenue
� � �� y RECEIVED BY(Staff Initials):
Clearvvater, Florida 33756
� Telephone:727-562-4567 DATE RECEIVED:
Fax:727-562-4865
❑ SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION
❑ SUBMIT 14 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION-Plans and
application are required to be collated,stapled and folded into sets
* NOTE:A TOTAL OF 15 SETS OF THIS APPLICATION AND ALL SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION IS REQUIRED TO BE SUBMITTED IN
CONJUNCTION W1TH A COMPLETE LEVEL ONE OR LEVEL TWO APPLICATION.
COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM
(Revised 04/24/200'n
�PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT�
APPLICANT,PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4202.A)
APPUCANT NAME: Thomas W.Carey,Trustee of the T 8�L Land Trust
MAILING ADDRESS: 622 Bypass Drive,Suite 100 Clearwater,FL 33764
PHONE NUMBER: 727-799-3900 FAX NUMBER: 727-231-0869
CELL NUMBER: EMAIL: donna@tcarey.com
PROPERTY OWNER(S): Thomas W.Carey,Trustee of the T 8 L Land Trust
List ALL owners on the deed
AGENT NAME• Synergy Civil Engineering,Inc.(Michael J.Palmer)
MAILING ADDRESS: 3000 Gulf to Bay Bivd.,Suite 201 Clearwater, FL 33759
PHONE NUMBER: 727-�96-�926 FAX NUMBER:
CELL NUMBER: EMAIL: mpalmer@synergycivileng.com
1. ARCHITECTURAL THEME:
a. The landscaping in a Comprehensive landscape Program shall be designed as a part of the architectural theme of the principal buildings
proposed or developed on the parcel proposed for the development.
The following variances are being�roposed 1)For the south side along Druid Road-Reduce the South setback from 25 ft to
19 ft. 2)For the west side adjacent to the Power Company-Reduce the West setback from 10 ft to 4.5 feet Enhanced
an scapin i s n w s i e.
OR
b. The design,character, location and/or materials of the landscape treatrnent proposed in the Comprehensive Landscape Program shall be
demonstrably more attractive than landscaping otherwise permitted on the parcel proposed for development under the minimum landscape
standards.
C.1Documents and Settings�derekfergusonlDeskfoplplanningforms_07071Comprehensive Landscape Program 04-24-07.doc
Page 1 of 2
.
2. COMMUNITY CHARACTER:
The landscape treatment proposed in the Comprehensive Landscape Program will enhance the community character of the Cily of Clearwater.
The proposed development wiil enhance the community character of the City of Clearwater by the use of enhanced
landscaping along the south property line and around the proposed parking spaces on the west side of the parcel.
3. PROPERTY VALUES:
The landscape treatment proposed in the Comprehensive Landscape Program will have a benefiaat impact on the value of the property in the
immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development
n tha+thana is si�ff'jCIBfltTarking onsitP This
alone will increase the value of the existing and adjacent propefies. The proposed development is a seamless transition from the
existing pa ng o in o e propose pa ing spaces. e propos re irnng wa m e mo ry reten on pon a a e
trees and plantinqs alonq the south and west propertv lines will result in increased value to the property as well as adjacent
properly owners.
4. SPECIAL AREA OR SCENIC CORRIDOR PLAN:
The landscape treatment proposed in the Comprehensive Landsqpe Program is consistent with any speciai area or scenic corridor plan which
the City of Clearwater has prepared and adopted for the area in which the parcel proposed for development is located.
N/A
THE LANDSCAPING REQUIREMENTS OF ARTICLE 3, DIVISION 12 MAY BE WAIVED OR MODIFIED AS A PART OF A LEVEL ONE OR LEVEL
TWO APPLICATION, AS THE CASE MAY BE, IF THE APPLICATION FOR DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL INCLUDES A COMPREHENSIVE
LANDSCAPE PROGRAM, WHICH SATISFIES THE ABOVE CRITERIA. THE USE OF LANDSCAPE PLANS, SECTIONS / ELEVATIONS,
RENDERINGS AND PERSPECTIVES MAY BE NECESSARY TO SUPPLEMENT THE INFORMATION PROVIDED ON THIS WORKSHEET.
SIGNATURE:
I,the undersigned,adcnowledge that all representations made in STATE OF FLORIDA,COUNTY OF PINELLAS�
this application are Uue and accurate to the best of my m to nd subscribed before me this L�day of
Imowledge and author¢e City representatives to visit and ,A.D.20 to me and/or by
photograph th rope escribed in thi ppl' tion. o is pe naNy known has
P ��
as identificati ACKSO
� " �": f��Y COMMISStON#DD7547 9
X IR b 201
Signature of property e or representative Notary public, (4p7)396-095'� FloridalloferyServlce.eom
My commission exp�res: °�
C.�1Documents and SettingslderekfergusonWesktop�pianningforms_07071Comprehensive Landscape Program 04-24-07.doc
Page 2 of 2
� Flexibility Criteria (Office Zoning District) FLD2011-07026-622 Bypass Dr.
Flexibility with regard to use, lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street parking are
justified based on demonstrated compliance with all of the following design objectives:
A. The proposed development will not impede the normal and orderly development
and improvement of the surrounding properties for uses permitted in this zoning
district.
RESPONSE- The proposed development is bounded by road right of ways on the
south and east property lines and a power company easement on the west. The
additional parking area wil!hove no impact on the surrounding properties.
B. The proposed development complies with applicable design guidelines adopted by
the city.
RESPONSE- The proposed project will meet all applicable design guidelines
adopted by the city.
C. The design, scale and intensity of the proposed development supports the
established or emerging character of an area.
RESPONSE- The origina/ project was constructed in 2003 with an anticipated
parking demand of 3 spaces per 1000 GFA, however as the dient base grew the
parking demand increased and is now ot approximately 5 parking spaces per 1000
GFA. The increase in off street parking is consistent with the established character
of the area ond will eliminate the current need for vehides to park on the city
street/sidewa/ks.
D. In order to form a cohesive, visually interesting and attractive appearance, the
proposed development incorporates a substantial number of the following design
elements:
• Changes in horizontal building planes.
• Use of architectural details such as columns, cornices, stringcourses, pilasters,
porticos, balconies, railings, awnings, etc.
• Variety in materials, colors and textures.
• Distinctive fenestration patterns.
• Building step backs.
• Distinctive �oofs forms.
1
� Flexibility Criteria (Office Zoning District) FLD2011-07026-622 Bypass Dr.
RESPONSE- The proposed development has been designed to be a harmonious
continuation of the existing parking area. The proposed design includes additional
landscaping, and incorporates the same block material used in an existing
retaining wa/l on site for the proposed retaining wall adjacent to the proposed
parking area.
E. The proposed development provides for appropriate buffers, enhanced landscape
design and appropriate distances between buildings.
RESPONSE- Enhanced /andscaping is proposed a/ong the south property line and
around the proposed parking spaces on the west side of the property.
2
�DRE��URNT� ���� INST # 96-155382
Ou7da1i°°i,`d ����W. E9Q� JUN 6, 1996 11:14AM
9ELLEAIFi,FL 9/dt0�960
This Quitclaim Deed made this,�_day uf �� r���.n.,
Bctwcen ;�
WILFItIED H. �LORIN und KAREN Y. FLORIN, his wife, `, � :
�
. of the Cuuiiry af Pi►te!/rr� Statr u�Flnrida. Grorrtru', und PINELLA5 COUN'flf-Fj,A: �� :
OFF.REC.BK 9365"PG 13�'Q`.
� : TqOMAS W.CAREY,Trustec,of thc T&L Land Trust datexi August Z2, 1985,with full powcr and aujhnrity tn;prntcct, �'�
I : consc�vc.sc(1 k:asc,encumber or otherwise maesy,c smd dispose of saict property pursuant tu F�rida Stdtu�6Ry�7{.
�� ., ,
���wu'ssr addrus is: 622 Bpp�ss Drivc.Pincllas Clcarwatcr, of the Caunty uf ,' �` `•
� � .
, � , .
Pincll�.�, Sttttc of Fk��ida,Gran[ec! ' � ` `��,'
. � � �� ,
! „ � �
Witoccscth, diat Ilie GR�lNTO�for und ut ca�uiderutiwi of!he sum uf TEN DL�LIJII��AND NO�1/JO (�'!p.(XJ) �o
• C;Iti1N70R in hund puir!by GRANfF.�rhe rcecipc whem�f rs l�enby adrno�vlalgrc� has,rfeaei�d rclea�!-mtr�yuitcluimr�� rnert
Irr liJ4►B�?r"..SCIiiS(IOCb'fCl7:is�rcJrwr wu!qtritcicim u�cro s�id GRA1V7�'E a(!tlie tigh�titl�in�erns�y dpfm an�dcrnend n/rirh aiirl '
� C:ILtN'%Qlt hu.c ue ri�rd to dn foltu►ving dcscribal!oy picce or parcrl nf lanr�sit�wt� lying�trid bcing ui Atry►Crnoity of/'i�icl4�s,Str�►c �
' nJ'Flnrida, to roil: • , '
�` .
{ " _
` [.i��2, tugcthcr with S 2"OF Lot 1,BYPASS PARK,Plat Book 92,Page Z, and L.ot 3, BYPASS PARK,
`' 1ca�rding w thc map or pint thereoF as recorded in Plat Bool 9�i,P�ge 2,Public Rccords of Pincllas Cuunty, _
�
:s Florida ��� .'; :
. . . . , .
.'' �� �
' nnd murc cc�mmonly l.-nown as:622 Bypass Drive, Cleatwater, Ptipejlas,Ctmnty,Flenda
_ ,^� ����,�� -! Documr.ntary Tax Pd. 9 ' �d .
�� Parccl # 18-29-16-129320000020 � ��
.� ,_`��.`. �` � 6— -- Int�a�ibla Tax Pd,
. � � �
�; '"Grantor"and"Grantec"are used for s� ot pfurai,ag dpdtext requires, xcrietln F, t k�,cie�k.Pinolla:co:mcy :
' Sociai Security No.of Grantcc: 59-68�` ,� �.% ar oepucy C�xk 's
:i � , �� � .
1 TO IIAVE AND TO HOLU die samc�(ugFthAC�!�o/�lrnil surgerlar dic appurte►wnces nc�reunto beJu►rging ur ui unp�i�.n .
- uplxrtuini��, and aJ!�he es(a�righ�titl�ti�e�es�Jiat�eqaily and claim whulsoever uf Gmntur, eirher in luw or eqidty. cn d�e urily
- proper erse, brnrfit and bchoof uf said.Gsrintee�'wrve(.�, `
_ `� ;
Thc subject properry i�somm�rc�i�lproperty and not end never has becn thc homcstcad property of thc Grantor.whci �
- residcs at �� .Clcanvatcr, Florida. '
� �
'�'� , � �, �
IN WITNCSS WULREO}�(he Giruitor has heneim�o set hrs hand and sw!the day and ywr fus�ub�ivr nritlriw
a.. __ � .
� 01 Rr:C�„�f*.;; �
Siu�cd,.,s�culed,�ne�d�l�vet�in W`pFCSCUCe of• �� � �_ .
� _t�' ' �a�l �t..r�.-,J�n� [�.sr� ), kEC --- au
` l (Scal) �F?':9 ::]G
:� rint) � . .. _ . . ;-WILFRIED H.FLORIN ��` .._.._.___
� ,�,�_ ,, �c�� .� ,_;� ;t, . trrr �
� �� ��- ���' '' (s��) �r�: -.,......_.. ;:
� (�rlrlt� 2 " '�� - ��j1' Y.FL IN C�r:, ' M^` s:
; , `'
. . :� ,•: „t _ _ ..___---- �.
, STATf`p�I'i F�X9�RIDA '••:�'i-"•:ii.i•'r� }+• FF�:tt __ - �,
�� ��`.�COUN7'iP�I�Pll�i�LLAS •'•7�"H:� } hi�l F _ �� !.
:� � ` ,' � � REV :
� � '. . , ---, •
�: Tfie khegaing document was acknowiedged before me on the f�_duy af l L 1946,by WILI�RIED L_FLO ,,nd_� i
� KARCN Y.[�[.ORIN,who:�rc personally known to mc,or O arc nat person known to me�who pn�c�(�+' --� �
as identificatiun. '
�
� ��� NOT Y PUBLIC K
tpRY PVe OFFICIAL NOTARY SEAL � � , .� z
O �i CHRIS7INE MuNDAY �� '
« 1 ..�.;� � ' /
�-�'.: � COMMISSION 11UMBER '• �:-" •�� /./-'' l'j� :
`:�"{;,.', Q CC351915
'�„:�' o Statc of Florida at Largc ;
F� ��D MY COMMISSION EXa. �
o�;.� �,RqR, y,�og, Commission Numbcr& Expiration Datc: �
:�nix;���ta.,.uc�n �
{
:i f
i
�
i ,a
. �
I�: 2005275791 BK: 14455 PG: 1494, 07/15/2005 at 10:49 AM, RECORDING 2 PAGES
$18.50 D DOC STAMP COLLECTION $2344.30 KEN BURKE, CLERK OF COURT PINET•T•IIR
COUNTY, FL BY DEPUTY CLERFC: CLKRD22
� ,
This inelnm�mt pn,pered by end redun co:
7111.E SECURI'[Y
2552 l et Ava�ae North
St PUaebucg,EL 33713 ���
� '
Fk#OS-11999 � �
_ � i
. �'--_� �.
• ,--. . ��
�` `�:
�'� �� �
.�,' � �
. . .
.``„','
--- .
- �.
��, . � �.
WARRANTY DEED � � � � �'�
� , � ,
� , � �
, . • ,
_ , , , ,
.,-
: ;� , __ , ,
, ' ---
, ; ,-�� .
� , � �
, , , �
This WARRANTY DEED is made this�day of Ja1y,2005 between THOMAS`,' --'�'
W. CAREY, as Trustee of The T.& L. Land Trust dsted August 22, 1985, whose mailing �`-"
addtess is:622 Bypass Drive,Suitc 100,Cleazwater,FI.33764, ("Grentor")anc(�T�E SII.ENT
J'S PLUS T,LLC,s Florida limited liability company, whose mailing address Ss:�622 Bypas��
Drive Clearw8ter FL 33764"(Crtantee"), ,, ���` �'.
. , ,
� .�'� `�'�
WTTNESSETH,that the said Gisntor,for and in�nsidetation of the sum a?�'teniJoll�s.(51�6.00)
and other valuable consid�ation to said Grantor in hand Paid, the�?eceiPt��v�liyreof i�hereby
aclmowledged, hes granted, bargained, and sold unto the said GranteF,`�nd�Q Grantee's heus,
svccessots and assigns forever,all that c�tain pm�cel of land Iega�I"y d�cxiDod as I1Qws:
�, '.�
Lots 5,6 and 7,Togther with the Sonth 22.00 feet of Lot 4,BYPASS`�A1ZR,as Recorded in
Plat Book 92,Page 2,of the Pablic Records of PTmeD�s,Conn`�y,Florida.�
. ,�. � �
Resl Estate Tax Parcel No: 18CZ9/16/12�3�%000/00�0��dc��8/Z9/16/12932/000/0060 &
18/32/16/12932/000l0070&18/29/16/12932/00�/6d40 � �����
: : ' .
�Thomas W. Carey,Tnistee aff'ums that h�ie tli��t ading Tmstee of The T.&L. Land Trus�t
dated August 22,1985 and that said T��es not bee�amended or revoked and is in full force and
effect , , �,� •
, ` �
.� ��, �
. .�
, -- �.
.
, -- `,
� �.' �� .` ��
� , � � '
� � �
` �
. � , ;
�`,` .� _ � .
`� �--
,. --___-_.
, .
.``,` `
� �
�, � , Page 1
. . ,
.� , �
PINELLAS COUNTY FL OFF. REC. BK 14455 PG 1495
And the said Crrentor does hereby fiilly weirent the tifle to said laad, and will def�d the same
against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoeva,except taxes for the year 2005 and subseque�t
yeazs.("Grenbor"and"GTSatee"are used herein fur singnler or plival,the singular shall include the �',
plural,and mry ge,nder shall include all gendeas,as context reqtures.) �� ',
� �
WITNESSES: � -'-�' �
�
--_ .
' ,� - '.
.' �� �� � ��%
, ,� , ,
� Witness THO S W. CAREY, ustee of TLe ��,;. ,����
� T.&L.Lsnd Trnst Aagast 22, --_ �
.
1985 - ��`�
.', �`,
� � � ' `` ` ���
� , � ,
� . � �
W� .4w.leYw+ Fti fw.t '- � ` ' ,
. � ,
,�,
' �� �` -- ' .
, � ,_,
� , �'�•
� ` � ,
� . � '
STATE OF FLORIDA ` ' ,' :
COUNTY OF PINELLAS __� �
SWORN TO AND SUBSCRIBED befote me this � day of July, 2005, by��OMAS W.
CAREY, Trastce of The T. & L. Land Trns dated Angost 22, 1985, who is/�ne`personaljy�
knowa to me or hasThave pmduced f l4 �. G'� as ideatFgcatioa. '.'� ' �
�
�,��.
�rrca�oHi�oa��e �s � `' �'
�: � ��%
� . �nwnor�r��«c �
Notary `c th 6C�te of Florida
MY,(.`,omm�ssirnl glcp�iie�
�S�►L) �.� ��`
, � � ,
,�, � . � �
. .
,` .
,. _,
,�,
.�, ���
:�: ���.
,� .
.. �.
, ,` (
,�,
��� ,. �.
�: � ��
. ,
,` `�,
.
� -- ,` .
, , � �. , ,�>
� � � � �
� � � �
� � � ,
�� . � .
, .� __ � .
.
____-_. .
., '.� ____;
�� .
.�
�, � �,;
� �
� , Page 2
'.' � ,
.� � ,
A
��� SYNERGY PARKING STUDY& NARRATIVE . '� ' • ' ' �
Civil Engineering, Inc.
3000 Gulf to Bay Boulevard,Suite 201
Clearwater,FL 33759
(727)796-1926
www.synergycivileng.com
Certificate of Authorization No.27692
PARKING STUDY & NARRATIVE
PREPARED
FOR
Carey Law Office Building
622 Bypass Drive
Clearwater, Florida 33764
Preaared bv
SYNERGY CIVIL ENGINEERING, INC.
3000 Gulf to Bay Boulevard,Suite 201
Clearwater, FI 34759
— Page 1
PARKING STUDY& NARRATIVE '• ' •' ' �
NARRATIVE
OBJECTIVE:
The goal of this report is to demonstrate that the 20 additional parking spaces proposed to
be constructed at 622 Bypass Drive in the City of Clearwater, are necessary due to the
current and future operational needs of the businesses located at the subject property.
BACKGROUND:
The project is located on a 1.52 +/- acre parcel of land located at the intersection of Druid
Road and Bypass Drive. The following buildings are located within the project property
boundaries:
• 8,615 square foot office building occupied by Law Office
• 6,632 square foot office building occupied by Medical Records Office
The law office currently employs 31 people and the medical records office employs 20
people. The total number of employees is 51 and there are 53 standard parking spaces and
4 handicapped spaces available.
The available parking for clients is 2 standard spaces and 4 handicapped spaces. The law
firm has on average 10 to 15 walk in clients per day and conducts at a minimum one to two
depositions per month and one mediation meeting per month. The average number of
people attending a deposition is 4 and the average number of people attending a mediation
meeting is 6.
On a monthly average the law firm will have at least two (2) depositions or mediation
meetings occurring simultaneously and frequently (3) depositions or mediation meetings
occurring simultaneously.
On a daily basis the parking lot is full and clients are force to park on Bypass Drive, the
ReMax Reality parking lot,Sam's Club Parking lot or the drive aisle within the subject parcel.
The law firm has been notified on a few occasions by the Clean�vater Police Department that
their clients were parking illegally within the ReMax Reality property parking lot. (See
exhibit "A"for a map of the overflow parking areas)
Page 2
PARKING STUDY& NARRATIVE ' • ' � ' ' �
The following is an example of a monthly parking demand that occurs during 3
simultaneous deposition meetings:
• 51 Employees
• 15 Walk in Clients/Meetings
• 14 Clients/Attorneys
• Total =80 Employees/Clients/Attorneys
The above example does not include visitors to the Medical Records Office.
METHODOLOGY:
It was agreed that a static parking count taken during the normal work week Monday
through Friday would be sufFicient to document the current parking demand. The
businesses normally operate Monday through Friday from 8:00 AM to 5:00 PM so a
weekend parking count was not necessary.
CITY OF CLEARWATER CODE REQUIEMENTS:
Per section 2-1004 of the City of Clearwater code (Flexible Development) OfFice District the
minimum parking requirement for the subject buildings is 3 spaces per 1000 square feet of
building GFA. The total existing building GFA is 15,247, making the total minimum parking
requirement 46 parking stalls.
DATA COLLECTION, 622 BYPA55 DRIVE:
Table A
TIME DAY OCCUPIED HANDI OVER OVER OVER OVER TOTAL
SPACES CAP FLOW FLOW FLOW FLOW PARKING
ON SITE SPAGES PARKING PARKING PARKING PARKING
AREA-1 AREA-2 AREA-3 AREA-4
11:30 9-01- 55 2 2 10 2 3 74
� 11
10:00 9-06- 53 0 1 7 2 0 63
� 11
2:00 9-0�- 53 0 0 14 2 2 71
PM ��
11:00 9-09- 53 0 2 12 0 0 67
� 11
Page 3
PARKING STUDY&NARRATIVE ' • ' • ' ' �
CONCLUSION:
The parking count indicates that on a daily basis the current onsite parking is being utilized
to its maximum capacity forcing clients and visitors to seek parking in unsafe and illegal
parking areas.
It was observed that cars parking along Bypass Drive would park on the sidewalk
obstructing the pathway of pedestrian traffic. It was also noted that there was an unsafe
condition while opening the driver's side door when parked on Bypass Drive as trafFic
speeds appeared to be greater than 30 mph.
Also, clients / visitors that parked in the Sam's Club Parking lot had to cross Bypass Drive
with no available crosswalk. Visitors that parked at the ReMax Reality parking lot did so
illegally.
The 20 additional parking spaces proposed will alleviate the daily unsafe parking conditions
that exist today and should provide adequate parking for peak times when meetings at the
law office occur simultaneously.
The proposed parking ratio will be 5 / 1000 which is acceptable within the Office Zone
District.
If you have any questions regarding this report please contact me at 727-796-1926.
Sincerely,
, /,:
r ! �j -
!/
Michael J. Palmer
Project Manager
Page 4
Y
PARKING STUDY& NARRATIVE ' • ' • ' ' � '
EXHIBIT A
OVER FLOW PARKING AREA DIAGRAM
� .._.w.�� . .
, , �
�� �
�
�� tk;
Z
�
� � � �. �.
��s h:¢�{�'
f. V . . a .#. .�. '..ab 1 S �.. �
1 . ., ���� 1� � �.
I ► � i;
1. _� —_ / ��el' �.. �.ti.�+.
f �
��
:�. }_...: _
4'. "^`dw.r.... y.7.�.�.._ {� � � '� ; � Yd
e:� r��F-::,T n 4�l Z 4 J r . . } ..
,>ti' =1 s�s �a�yyt� �`���'�� x s:F w��,,� t �„a p v��^�;t.,"",�k��;� �*� .;��y '
: ,h'3.� �,"��.;k YAk�s�sf�F' w,..a.>�:� " , : , .,. ,.�,
�: ��y,�$.+3�ryt� j::fl a+Fi'� `�u i rx v }..2 r�y+' _
;�dd �.. �.
� � �:
} � y.;:.t ���} �
:' � ''' �,l�t `�:
PARKING AREA DESCRIPTION:
• (Area-1) Project Site Interior parking within driveway aisle.
• (Area-2) Parking within Bypass Road Right of Way.
• (Area-3) Parking within property owned by ReMax Realty.
• (Area-4) Parking within property owned by Sam's Club.
Page 5
� •
�/ �`�/ 3000 Gulf to Bay Boulevard,Suite 201
�'� �� S I N E RV i Clearwater,FL 33759
(727)79Cr1926
Civil Engineering, Inc.
www.synergycivileng.com
Certificate of Authorization No.27692
September 11, 2011
City of Clearwater
A. Scott Kurleman, Planner III
Municipal Services Building
100 South Myrtle Avenue
Ciearwater, FL 33756
RE: 622 Bypass Drive
FLD2011-07026 (Additiona) Items Requested to Complete Submittal per DRC
Comments Dated 5-29-2011)
The following items have been included or revised on the plans and or application
submitted to the City of Clearwater for the above referenced project:
En�ineerin� Review
1. Sheets C-02 and C-06 are beyond the requirements of the DRC submittal and have
not been reviewed.
. 2. DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may be
forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application.
RESPONSE:Acknowledged
Environmental Review
1. DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may be
forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application.
RESPONSE:Acknowledged
F i re Review
1. All dumpsters and any associated screening which consists of combustible fencing
around the dumpster pad shall have a minimum separation from the nearest building
overhang of ten feet (10').
RESPONSE:Dumpster enclosure is existing and not part of this project
2. Sheet 7 of 10 shows the scales as 1"=10' scale does not match.
Page 1
.
RESPONSE:Drawing scale has been revised to 1"=10:
3. The plan indicates brick pavers, note. Must be able to meet the requirements of NFPA-1,
2006 edition Chapter 18 Clearwater Fire & Rescue has a weight of 80,000 Ibs
ACKNOWLEDGE PRIOR TO CDB.
RESPONSE:The brick pavers were install in 2003 and they are not/ocated over any storm
vault or chamber system. The pavers are not part of the projeci:
Land Resource Review
1. The proposed 1'-2' cuts adjacent to trees 602, 203, 604 and 606 is too close and too
severe as these tree species are intolerant to these impacts. Either change the parking
surFace to concrete with a monolithic curb on grade and provide W.A.N.E. aeration
system or remove the trees. Note an inch for inch replacement ratio will be required.
RESPONSE: Trees have been removed and rep/aced(see landscape plan).
Plannin� Review
1. Show by a parking count / study why the site needs so much parking. Only 43 spaces
area required but proposal is for 75 spaces. Staff is not inclined to support a side setback
reduction to 4.5 feet when the site is compliant with parking requirements.
RESPONSE:See Parking Stud y/narrotive.
2. Staff is not inclined to support 12 parking spaces in a row when parking requirements
have been exceeded.
RESPONSE:The 12 parking spaces are to be located within the existing paved area,no
additiona/pavement is required.
3. Show calculations for interior landscape plantings. Note: Areas, such as retention ponds
do not count toward interior landscape requirements unless they meet the planting
requirements.
RESPONSE:Interior/andscape calcu/ations have been revised and shown on the landscape
p/an.Square footages of the interior landscape areas are noted on the landscape p/an.
4. A condition of Development Order will be that the two interior islands and landscape
buffers identified on the landscape plan be planted per the approved landscape plan
from 2003.
RESPONSE:Noted on the landscape p/an sheet.
5. Identify what type of plant material is proposed for the two interior islands with new
light poles and new power control boxes.
Page 2
I
RESPONSE: The interior islands will now remain in p/ace.
6. Correct site data table to indicate two side setbacks and two front setbacks, there is no
rear and required parking spaces is 46 not 43.
RESPONSE:Site data table has been corrected.
Storm water Review
1. The lowest berm elevation is at 37.70,which is 0.52' lower than the top of control
structure (38.22). Please address this issue.
RESPONSE:The gnading plon now shows proposed contours for top and bottom of
bank and directs the contractor to re-establish the top of bank.
2. Based on the site visit 8/18/11.The pond appeared to be wet, but the underdrain pipe
was not flowing water. Please assess the underdrain condition and restore it to working
condition.
RESPONSE:I personally performed a site visit on 9-6-11 at 10:30 AM and noted that
the water in the pond was at the weir elevotion 1.5'above the pond bottom. The 6"
under droin was approximately f/owing ha/f full and appeared to be operoting
correct/y. I personally made a return site visit on 9-7-11 (24 hours later)and noted that
the pond had drained to the pond bottom. There was no visible standing water. l
returned on 9-9-11 at 10:00 AM and noted that the landscape contractor had cut the
gross in the pond bottom and banks and no visible woter was noted.
3. Please install a trench drain across the entrance at Druid Road or grade the new parking
area so that runoff can sheet flow directly to the pond. Current design shows runoff is
being directed toward the existing inlet at the entrance,which does not appear to
capture runoff efFectively.
RESPONSE:A trench droin and detail has been added to the p/an set.
4. Please note, only 20% percent void in stone layer is allowed for required volume.
RESPONSE:The chamber calculations have been revised to show 20%void ratio.
5. When Rational Method is used, please utilize time of concentration of 60 minutes for
both pre and post conditions.
RESPONSE:Calcu/ations have been revised to show the rotiona/method with a pre&
post development Tc of 60 minutes.
6. Please show all design elevations, including seasonal high water table(SHWT), on
section B-B and pond the pond cross section. It is required that that the SHWT shall be
6" minimum below the stone layer of the StormTech chamber.
RESPONSE:Information has been added to the cross sections.
7. Provide drawdown calculations of the existing pond and the proposed stormtech
chamber meeting the City's 24 hour recovery requirement.
RESPONSE:The original calculations and the calculations(using Ponds Software)to
check the drow down time are included in the storm water repori:
Page 3
8. Please submit the soils analysis with the SHWT supporting the design.
RESPONSE:A copy of the soils report is included.
9. The�" water quality volume provided in the pond from the pond bottom to the weir
elevation is not sufficient for the entire site.
RESPONSE:Per our conversations the open pond as been enlarged by removing 2
parking spaces. The open pond now ho/d approximately 82%of the treatment volume
and the remainder is contained within the storm chambers.
10. Please design the system so that runoff from the site drains to the pond first for
treatment and overflows to the chamber when the treatment elevation is reached.The
outlet pipe from the chamber shall be a separate pipe.
RESPONSE:The system is now designed to droin storm wofer into the pond frrst.
Prior to Building Permit:
1. Submit the operational and maintenance guide for the entire storm water
management system that was accepted by the owner.
2. Provide a copy of the approved SWFWMD permit.
RESPONSE:Acknowledged.
General note:
1. All resubmittals shall be accompanied with a response letter addressing
how each department condition has been met.
2. DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional
comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application.
RESPONSE:Acknowledged.
Traffic Review
1. DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional
comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application.
RESPONSE:Acknowledged.
Synergy Civil Engineering, Inc.
i
� � ; ;'� / ,:
, �
Michael J. Palm r, P.E.
Project Manager
Page 4