The URL can be used to link to this page

08/16/2011Present: Absent: Also Present: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD MEETING MINUTES CITY OF CLEARWATER August 16, 2011 Nicholas C. Fritsch Doreen DiPolito Frank L. Dame Brian A. Barker Kurt B. Hinrichs Norma R. Carlough Thomas Coates Richard Adelson Morris Massey Leslie Dougall-Sides Michael Delk Gina Clayton Robert Tefft Patricia O. Sullivan Chair Board Member Board Member Board Member Board Member Acting Board Member Vice-Chair Board Member Attorney for the Board Assistant City Attorney Planning & Development Director Assistant Planning & Development Director Development Review Manager Board Reporter The Chair called the meeting to order at 1:00 p.m. at City Hall, followed by the Invocation and Pledge of Allegiance. To provide continuity for research, items are in agenda order although not necessarily discussed in that order. C- APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING: July 19, 2011 Member Dame moved to approve the minutes of the regular Community Development Board meeting of July 19, 2011, as recorded and submitted in written summation to each board member. The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously. D— CONSENT AGENDA: Followinq cases are not contested by applicant, staff, neiqhborinq property owners, etc. and will be approved by a sinqle vote at the beqinninq of the meetinq: (Items 1— 4) 1. Case: FLD2011-06022 — 385 Mandalay Avenue Level Two Application Owners/ Applicant: 387 — 391 Mandalay Ave, LLC. Agent: Renee Ruggiero, Northside Engineering (300 S Belcher Road, Clearwater, FL 33765); phone: (727) 443-2869; fax: (727) 446-8036; email: renee@northsideengineering. net) Location: 0.185 acre located on the east side of Mandalay Avenue just north of the Memorial Causeway roundabout Atlas Page: 267A Zoning: Tourist (T) District Request: Flexible Development approval to permit Retail Sales and Services of 1,899 square-feet of floor area and Restaurants of 6,075 square-feet of floor area in the Tourist (T) District with a lot area of 8,074 square-feet, a lot width of 74.95 feet on Mandalay Avenue (west), a front (south) setback of zero feet (to building and sidewalk), a front (west) setback of zero feet (to building and Community Development 2011-08-16 sidewalk), a side(north) setback of zero feet (to building and sidewalk), a side (east) setback of 24 feet (to parking), a building height of 32.47 feet (to flat roof) and 3 parking spaces, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of the Community Development Code Section 2-803.C. Proposed Use: 1,899 square-feet of retail sales and service use and 6,075 square-feet of restaurant use Neighborhood Associations: Clearwater Beach Association and Clearwater Neighborhoods Coalition Presenter: Matt Jackson, Planner II See Agenda for Staff Report. Member Dame moved to approve Case FLD2011-06022 on today's Consent Agenda based on evidence in the record, including the application and the Staff Report, and hereby adopt the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law stated in the Staff Report, with conditions of approval as listed. The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously. 2. Case: LUP2011-01002 — 2995 Drew Street Level Three Application (Related to REZ2011-01002, DVA2011-06001) Owner/Applicant: Clearwater Housing Authority/BayCare Health System, Inc. Representative: E.D. Armstrong III, Esquire, Johnson, Pope, Bokor, Ruppel & Burns, LLP (P.O. Box 1368, Clearwater, FL 33757; phone: 727-461-1818; fax: 727-462-0365; email: eda@jpfirm.com) Location: 39.79 acres, located on southwest corner of Drew Street and Bayview Avenue Atlas Page: 291 B Request: Future Land Use Map amendment from Residential Medium (RM) and Residential/Office/Retail (R/O/R) to Residential/Office Limited (R/OL). Type of Amendment: Large scale Proposed Use: Offices Neighborhood Associations: Skycrest Neighborhood Association and Clearwater Neighborhoods Coalition Presenter: Catherine Lee, Planner III See Agenda for Staff Report. See page 3 for recommendation of approval. 3. Case: REZ2011-01002— 2995 Drew Street Level Three Application (Related to LUP2011-01002, DVA2011-06001) Owner/Applicant: Clearwater Housing Authority/BayCare Health System, Inc. Representative: E.D. Armstrong III, Esquire, Johnson, Pope, Bokor, Ruppel & Burns, LLP (P.O. Box 1368, Clearwater, FL 33757; phone: 727-461-1818; fax: 727-462-0365; email: eda@jpfirm.com) Location: 39.79 acres, located on southwest corner of Drew Street and Bayview Avenue Atlas Page: 291 B Request: Zoning Atlas amendment from Medium Density Residential (MDR) and Commercial (C) to Office (0) Type of Amendment: Large scale Proposed Use: Offices Community Development 2011-08-16 2 Neighborhood Associations: Skycrest Neighborhood Association and Clearwater Neighborhoods Coalition Presenter: Catherine Lee, Planner III See Agenda for Staff Report. See below for recommendation of approval. 4. Case: DVA2011-06001 – 2995 Drew Street Level Three Application (Related to LUP2011-01002, REZ2011-01002) Owners/Applicant: Clearwater Housing Authority/BayCare Health System, Inc. Representative: E.D. Armstrong II1, Esquire, Johnson, Pope, Bokor, Ruppel & Burns, LLP (P.O. Box 1368, Clearwater, FL 33757; phone: 727-461-1818; fax: 727-462-0365; email: eda@jpfirm.com) Location: 39.79 acres, located on southwest corner of Drew Street and Bayview Avenue Atlas Page: 291 B Request: Review of, and recommendation to the City Council, of a Development Agreement between BayCare Health System, Inc. (the developer) and the City of Clearwater under the provisions of Community Development Code Section 4-606 Proposed Use: Office use of up to 300,000 square-feet of floor area (0.20 Floor Area Ratio) at a maximum height of 50 feet Neighborhood Associations: Skycrest Neighborhood Association and Clearwater Neighborhoods Coalition Presenter: Catherine Lee, Planner III See Agenda for Staff Report. Acting Member Carlough moved to recommend approval of Cases: LUP2011-01002, REZ2011-01002, and DVA2011-06001 on today's Consent Agenda based on evidence in the record, including the applications and the Staff Reports, and hereby adopt the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law stated in the Staff Reports. The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously. E - ADJOURN The meeting adjourned at 1:14 p.m. � � � , �� _�� `� �'/��-_ - � - � . �- - .. - :.. . Community Development 2011-08-16 3 TO: FROM: COPIES: � o �� } � U Interdepartmental Correspondence Sheet Community Development Board Members Robert Tefft, Development Review Manager Leslie Dougall-Sides, Assistant City Attorney; Susan Chase, City Clerk Specialist; Sue Diana, Assistant City Clerk; /Pat Sullivan, Board Reporter SUBJECT: Agenda Items for August 16, 2011 DATE: August 11, 20ll CDB packets being distributed on contain the following items: Agenda Site investigation form Unapproved minutes of previous meeting Level Two Applications (Item 1) 1. Case: Case: FLD201 1-06002 — 385 Mandalay Avenue Yes No LEVEL THREE APPLICATIONS (Item 1): 1. Case: Case: LUP201 1-01002 — 2995 Drew Street DVA2011-06001) Yes / \ No I have Signature: (Related to REZ2011-01002, zl site visit to the followinQ properties. Date: ��,� �r.� PRINT NAME S: IPlanning DepartmentiC D BlAgendas DRC & CDBICDBI2011108 August 201111 Cover MEMO 2010.doc � � �� U Interdepartmental Correspondence Sheet TO: Community Development Board Members FROM: Robert Tefft, Development Review Manager COPIES: Leslie Dougall-Sides, Assistant City Attorney; Susan Chase, City Clerk Specialist; Sue Diana, Assistant City Clerk; /Pat Sullivan, Board Reporter SUBJECT: Agenda Items for August 16, 2011 DATE: August 1 l, 2011 CDB packets being distributed on contain the following items: Agenda Site investigation form Unapproved minutes of previous meeting Level Two Anplications (Item 1) 1. Cas� Case: FLD201 1-06002 — 385 Mandalay Avenue ,� \ Yes � No LEVEL THREE APPLICATIONS (Item 1): 1. Case: Case: LUP201 1-01002 — 2995 Drew Street (Related to REZ2011-01002, DV�S?�O l 1-06001) �Yes No Signat r : 'VL. Date: �' ( � �� ' '., � (,t..' (_ , �. . -__________ PRINT NAME S: IPlanning DepartmentlC D BlAgendas DRC & CDBICDBI2011108 August 2011 V Cover MEMO 2010.doc � 0 } �� U Interdepartmental Correspondence Sheet TO: Community Development Board Members FROM: Rohert Tefft, Development Review Manager COPIES: Leslie Dougall-Sides, Assistant City Attorney; Susan Chase, City Clerk Specialist; Sue Diana, Assistant City Clerk; /Pat Sullivan, Board Reporter SUBJECT: Agenda Items for August 16, 2011 DATE: August 1 l, 2011 CDB packets being distributed on contain the following items: Agenda Site investigation form Unapproved minutes of previous meeting Level Two Anplications (Item 1) 1. Case: Case: FLD201 1-06002 — 385 Mandalay Avenue [/ Yes No LEVEL THREE APPLICATIONS (Item 1): 1. Case: Case: LUP2011-01-002 — 2995 Drew Street (Related to REZ20 1 1-0 1 002, DVA2011-06001) Yes No I have Signature: Date: C�� .o ��.�✓l� � , ,��9�.��. PRINT NAME S: IPlanning DepartmentlC D BlAgendas DRC & CDBICDBI2011108 August 201111 Cover MEMO 2010.doc TO: FROM: COPIES: � ° ��va �r � � U Interdepartmental Correspondence Sheet Community Development Board Members Robert Tefft, Development Review Manager Leslie Dougall-Sides, Assistant City Attorney; Susan Chase, City Clerk Specialist; Sue Diana, Assistant City Clerk; /Pat Sullivan, Board Reporter SUBJECT: Agenda Items for August 16, 2011 DATE: August 11, 2011 CDB packets being distributed on contain the following items: Agenda Site investigation form Unapproved minutes of previous meeting Level Two Applications (Item 1) 1. Case: Case: FLD201 1-06002 — 385 Mandalay Avenue Yes No LEVEL THREE APPLICATIONS (Item 1): 1. Case: Case: LUP201 1-01002 — 2995 Drew Street (Related DVA2011-06001) Yes No to REZ20 1 1-0 1 002, PRINT NAME S: IPlanning DepartmentlC D BlAgendas DRC & CDBICDBI2011108 August 2011 V Cover MEMO 2010. doc TO: FROM: COPIES: � p �� U Interdepartmental Correspondence Sheet Community Development Board Members Robert Tefft, Development Review Manager Leslie Dougall-Sides, Assistant City Attorney; Susan Chase, City Clerk Specialist; Sue Diana, Assistant City Clerk; /Pat Sullivan, Board Reporter SUBJECT: Agenda Items for August 16, 2011 DATE: August 1 l, 2011 CDB packets being distributed on contain the following items: Agenda Site investigation form Unapproved minutes of previous meeting Level Two Auplications (Item 1) 1. Case: Case: FLD201 1-06002 — 385 Mandalay Avenue Yes V No LEVEL THREE APPLICATIONS (Item 1): 1. Case: Case: LUP201 1-01002 — 2995 Drew Street DVA2011-06001) Yes Signatu � (Related to REZ2011-01002, al site visit to the followinQ properties. Date: �Z- < La�,� L�t�/7� � t� % �'s �G� PRINT NAME S: IPlanning DepartmentlC D BlAgendas DRC & CDBICDB12011108 August 201111 Cover MEMO 2010.doc � O } �� U Interdepartmental Correspondence Sheet TO: Community Development Board Members FROM: Robert Tefft, Development Review Manager COPIES: Leslie Dougall-Sides, Assistant City Attorney; Susan Chase, City Clerk Specialist; Sue Diana, Assistant City Clerk; lPat Sullivan, Board Reporter SUBJECT: Agenda Items for August 16, 2011 DATE: August 11, 2011 CDB packets being distributed on contain the following items: Agenda Site investigation form Unapproved minutes of previous meeting Level Two Auplications (Item 1) 1. Case: Case: FLD201 1-06002 — 385 Mandalay Avenue Yes � No LEVEL THREE APPLICATIONS (Item 1): 1. Case: Case: LUP201 1-01002 — 2995 Drew Street (Related to REZ20 1 1-0 1 002, DVA2011-06001) Yes No ` 16 t� Signature: _ __ _ Date: � t�( �.- t -7'7. �--�' c iJ2 l C� 5 PRINT NAME S: IPlanning DepartmentlC D BlAgendas DRC & CDBICDBI2011108 August 201111 Cover MEMO 2010.doc , 0 � 385 MANDALAY AVE A Date Received: 6/1/2011 1:53:48 PM 387 and 397 Mandalay Ave ZONING DISTRICT: Tourist LAND USE: Resort Facilities High (30 du/acre) ATLAS PAGE: 267A PLANNER OF RECORD: PLANNER: Matthew Jackson, Planner II CDB Meeting Date: Case Number: Agenda Item: Owner/Applicant: Representative: Address: Augnst 16, 2011 FLD2011-06022 D. 1. 385 Mandalav Avenue, LLC Renee Ru�L�iero Senior Pro�ect Planner, Northside En�ineerin� 387 - 391 Mandalav Avenue CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT GENERAL INFORMATION: REQUEST: Flexible Development approval to permit Retail Sales and Services of 1,899 square feet of floor area and Restaurants of 6,075 square feet of floor area in the Tourist (T) District with a lot area of 8,074 square feet, a lot width of 74.95 feet on Mandalay Avenue (west), a front (south) setback of zero feet (to building and sidewalk), a front (west) setback of zero feet (to building and sidewalk), a side (north) setback of zero feet (to building and sidewalk), a side (east) setback of 24 feet (to parking), a building height of 32.47 feet (to flat roo fl and 3 parking spaces, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of the Community Development Code (CDC) Section 2-803.C. ZONING DISTRICT: Tourist (T) FUTURE LAND USE PLAN CATEGORY: BEACH BYDESIGN CHARACTER DISTRICT: Resort Facilities High (RFH) Retail and Restaurant District PROPERTY USE: Current: Retail Sales and Services of 3,800 square feet of floor area on the first floor and six attached dwelling units on the second floor with a total of seven parking spaces. Proposed: Retail Sales and Services of 1,899 square feet of floor area, Restaurants of 6,075 square feet of floor area and three parking spaces (including one handicapped space) with a 0.987 Floor Area Ratio at a height of 32.47 feet (to flat roo�. EXISTING North: SURROUNDING ZONING AND USES: South: East: Tourist (T) District Retail Sales and Services and Restaurants Tourist (T) District Clearwater Marina Tourist (T) District Retail Sales and Services West: Open Space/Recreation (OS/R) District Clearwater Beach Community Development Board — August 16, 2011 FLD2010-12033 -- Page 1 of 8 ANALYSIS: Site Location and Existing Conditions: The 0.18-acre subject property is located on the east side of Mandalay Avenue approximately 85 feet north of Causeway Boulevard which is within the "Retail/ Restaurant" District of Beach by Design. The site is currently developed with a two-story building comprised of 3,800 square feet of retail on the first floor and six attached dwellings on the second floor with a total of seven off- street parking spaces. Development Proposal: The development proposal is to demolish the existing building and to construct 1,899 square feet of retail sales and services floor area and 6,075 square feet of restaurant floor area. The building will be three stories with the third floor being mostly open and functioning as a rooftop deck. The first floor will contain two tenant spaces with Starbuck's occupying one of the tenant spaces. The owner is pursuing another national chain for the second tenant space. The second and third floor will be occupied by Hooters restaurant. The proposal includes front, side and rear setback reductions to provide for the proposed building to have similar setbacks as the existing as well as maintain the development pattern of the existing building immediately to the north. A sidewalk on the south side of the building connecting to existing City sidewalk will provide required building access. The proposal changes the architectural style from the existing to a tropical modern architecture, which is appropriate and aesthetically pleasing for this beachfront property and complements the tropical vernacular envisioned in Beach by Design. The proposal meets the tropical vernacular architecture guidelines through the use of large expanses of windows, covered and uncovered balconies allowing for outdoor seating, overhangs providing patrons on the balconies protection from the sun, awnings and sunshades providing the windows screening from the sun and finish treatments commonly found in tropical vernacular architecture such as stucco, wood (faux) and horizontal siding. Due to the location of the proposed building and the size and configuration of the subject property, only limited parking is available. The proposal includes a reduction to the required parking for retail sales and services from 10 spaces (based on 5 spaces per 1,000 square feet), and restaurant from 92 spaces (based on 15 spaces per 1,000 square feet) to three spaces. The applicant has submitted a Parking Demand Study that analyzed the available parking within 1,000 feet of the subject property. The development proposal's compliance with the various development standards of the Community Development Code (CDC) is discussed below. Floor Area Ratio (FAR): Pursuant to the Countywide Plan Rules and CDC Section 2-801.1, the maximum FAR for properties with a future land use plan designation of Resort Facilities High is 1.0. The proposal is for a total of 7,974 square feet of floor area at a FAR of 0.987, which is consistent with the Code provisions. Impervious Surface Ratio (ISR): Pursuant to the Countywide Plan Rules and CDC Section 2- 801.1, the maximum allowable ISR is 0.95. The proposed ISR is 0.95, which is consistent with the Code provisions. Community Development Board — August 16, 2011 FLD2010-12033 — Page 2 of 8 Minimum Lot Area and Width: Pursuant to CDC Table 2-803, there is no minimum lot area or width requirement for Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Projects. The subject property has a lot area 8,074 square feet and lot width along Mandalay Avenue of 74.95 feet. Minimum Setbacks: Pursuant to CDC Table 2-803, there are no minimum setback requirements for Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Projects. The development proposal includes a front (south) setback of zero feet (to building and sidewalk), a front (west) setback of zero feet (to building and sidewalk), a side (north) setback of zero feet (to building and sidewalk), and a side (east) setback of 24 feet (to parking) Maximum Buildin� Hei h�t�. Pursuant to CDC Table 2-803, there is no maximum allowable height for Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Projects. The proposed building is 34.51 feet (to top of building parapet). Minimum Off-Street Parkin�: Pursuant to CDC Table 2-803, the minimum off-street parking requirements for Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Projects shall be as determined by the Community Development Coordinator based on the specific use and/or ITE Manual standards. As stated previously, due to the location of the proposed building and the size and configuration of the subject property, only limited parking is available. The proposal includes a reduction to the required parking for retail sales and services from 10 spaces (based on 5 spaces per 1,000 square feet), and restaurant from 92 spaces (based on 15 spaces per 1,000 square feet) for a total of 102 required parking spaces to three spaces. Of these spaces, one will be dedicated for handicapped use. The applicant submitted a Parking Demand Study that analyzed the available parking within 1,000 feet of the subject property. The study concluded in accordance with a methodology established with the City of Clearwater staff that there are a total 1,040 available parking spaces within the study area. A maximum of 744 of these spaces were occupied at one time during the study period leaving 296 spaces available. As such, and as the study determined that the parking demand would generate a m�imum of 105 spaces, adequate parking is available within reasonable walking distance of the project. It should be noted that Beach by Design does not envision the parking would be provided on the individual properties of the Retail and restaurant District, but instead within a parking garage that would provide convenient parking to the District. The public parking available within the Hyatt and Surfside parking garages should help to meet the needs of this District. Mechanical Equipment: Pursuant to CDC Section 3-903.H.1, mechanical equipment shall be screened from any public right-of-way and adjacent properties. The proposal includes an open- air mechanical well area on the rooftop for mechanical equipment including HVAC. As the well is located on the rooftop, the interior of the well will not be able to be viewed from adjacent rights-of-way. The mechanical equipment will be screened from view from adjacent property owners by walls on all four sides of the well. Sight Visibilit.y Trian l�es�._ Pursuant to CDC Section 3-904.A, to minimize hazards at street or driveway intersections, no structures or landscaping may be installed which will obstruct views at a level between 30 inches above grade and eight feet above grade within 20-foot sight visibility triangles. There is only one existing driveway on this property accessing S.R. 60 that is not to be changed. The proposal has been reviewed by the City's Traffic Engineering Department and been found to be acceptable. Community Development Board - August 16, 2011 FLD2010-12033 - Page 3 of 8 Utilities: Pursuant to CDC Section 3-912, for development that does not involve a subdivision, all utilities, including individual distribution lines, must be installed underground unless such undergrounding is not practicable. Electric and communication lines for this development will be installed underground on-site in compliance with this requirement. It is unknown of the location of proposed electric panels, boxes and meters for this development. If located exterior to the building, to ensure views are minimized, this electrical equipment should be painted the same color as the building. The location and potential views of such electrical equipment will be addressed at the building permit stage. Landscapin� Pursuant to CDC Section 3-1202.D, there are no perimeter buffers required in the Tourist District; and pursuant to Section 3-1202.E, as the proposed vehicular use area is less than 4,000 square feet, no interior landscaping is required. Foundation plantings are not requested as the footprint of the proposed building matches the existing along Mandalay Avenue maintaining a cohesive development pattern along the property line not allowing appropriate area for foundation plantings. The south building fa�ade facing S.R. 60 is not receiving foundation landscaping as existing is a large area of landscaping between the proposed building and right- of-way. This landscaped area contains multiple palm trees, hedging and shrubs which meets the intent of the required foundation landscaping. A condition of approval will be included in the development order for the applicant to landscape and provide irrigation for the open areas. Solid Waste: The proposal will utilize three roll out dumpster for trash removal. Dumpsters will be located along the south building facade with walls matching the proposed building and gates meeting City of Clearwater specifications. On trash days, the dumpsters will be staged to meet the Solid Waste Department's trash pick-up requirements. Si na e: No freestanding or attached signage is proposed at this time. And while due to site constraints freestanding signage is not expected, freestanding signage in the Tourist District is restricted to a maximum height of four feet, or six feet through a Comprehensive Sign Program. Any approval of this application should include a condition allowing for freestanding signage, where such future freestanding signage must be a monument-style sign meeting Code requirements and be designed to match the exterior materials and color of the building. Any proposed attached signage not meeting minimum Code requirements will be approved through a Comprehensive Sign Program. Additional Beach by Desi�n Guidelines: Section C.1 requires buildings with a footprint of greater than 5,000 square feet to be constructed so that no more than two of the three building dimensions in the vertical or horizontal planes are equal in length. The proposed building footprint is approximately 3,988 square feet. And while the footprin� is less than 5,000 square feet, the proposal still meets the requirement. The project's overall horizontal plane dimensions are approximately 68 feet along Mandalay Avenue (west), 58 feet along Causeway Boulevard (south), 58 feet on north side of the building and 72 feet along the east side of the building, while the vertical plane is 36.84 feet from ground level to flat roo£ Except for the north and south building dimensions, no other dimensions are equal; thus the proposal complies with this provision. Section C.2 requires no plane or elevation to continue uninterrupted for greater than 100 feet without an offset of more than five feet. As all facades of the building are less than 100 feet in length, this requirement does not need to be met. However, the proposal does include step-backs which would suffice this requirement if necessary. Community Development Board — August 16, 20ll FLD2010-12033 — Page 4 of 8 Section C.3 requires at least 60 percent of any elevation to be covered with windows or architectural decoration. The elevations along Mandalay Avenue and Causeway Boulevard contain windows, railings, columns overhangs and faux wood treatments covering the entire building elevations. On the north and south elevations, where the visibility of the elevations is limited or hindered, less architectural decoration is practical and provided. This Beach by Design provision is a guideline that does not require relief. Section C.4 requires that no more than 60 percent of the theoretical maximum building envelope located above 45 feet be occupied by a building. As the m�imum height of the development proposal is 36.84 feet to flat roof, this guideline is not applicable. However, the building envelope is tapered and would meet this requirement if necessary. Code Enforcement Analysis: There are no active Code Enforcement cases for the subject property. COMPLIANCE WITH STANDARDS AND CRITERIA: The following table depicts the consistency of the development proposal with the standards as per CDC Section 2-801.1 and Tables 2-802 and 2-803: Standard Proposed Consistent Inconsistent Floor Area Ratio 1.0 7,974 square feet (0.987) X Impervious Surface Ratio 0.95 0.95 X Minimum Lot Area N/A 8,074 sq. ft. X Minimum Lot Width N/A 74.95 feet X Minimum Setbacks Front: N/A South: Zero feet (to building) X Zero feet (to building) West: Zero feet (to building) X Zero feet (to building) Side: N/A North: Zero feet (to building) X Zero feet (to sidewalk) East: 24 feet (to parking) X Maximum Height N/A 32.47 feet (to flat roofl X Minimum Off-Street Parking N/A 3 parking spaces X Community Development Board — August 16, 2011 FLD2010-12033 — Page 5 of 8 COMPLIANCE WITH FLEXIBILITY CRITERIA: The following table depicts the consistency of the development proposal with the Flexibility criteria as per CDC Section 2-803.0 (Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project): Inconsistent 1. The development or redevelopment is otherwise impractical without deviations from X the use and/or development standards set forth in this zoning district. 2. The development or redevelopment will be consistent with the goals and policies of X the Comprehensive Plan, as well as with the genera] purpose, intent and basic planning objectives of this Code, and with the intent and purpose of this zoning district. 3. The development or redevelopment will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of surrounding properties. 4. Adjoining properties will not suffer substantia] detriment as a result of the proposed development. 5. The proposed use shall otherwise be permitted by the underlying future land use category, be compatible with adjacent land uses, will not substantially alter the essential use characteristics of the neighborhood; and shall demonstrate compliance with one or more of the following objectives: a. The proposed use is permitted in this zoning district as a minimum standard, flexible standard or flexible development use; b. The proposed use would be a significant economic contributor to the City's economic base by diversifying the local economy or by creating jobs; c. The development proposal accommodates the expansion or redevelopment of an existing economic contributor; d. The proposed use provides for the provision of affordable housing; e. The proposed use provides for development or redevelopment in an area that is chazacterized by other similar development and where a land use plan amendment and rezoning would result in a spot land use or zoning designation; or a. The proposed use provides for the development of a new and/or preservation of a working waterfront use. �/_ X �i 6. Flexibility with regard to use, lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street X parking are justified based on demonstrated compliance with all of the following design objectives: a. The proposed development will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of the surrounding properties for uses permitted in this zoning district; b. The proposed development complies with applicable design guidelines adopted by the City; c. The design, scale and intensity of the proposed development supports the established or emerging character of an area; d. In order to form a cohesive, visually interesting and attractive appearance, the proposed development incorporates a substantial number of the following design elements: ❑ Changes in horizontal building planes; ❑ Use of architectural details such as columns, comices, stringcourses, pilasters, porticos, balconies, railings, awnings, etc.; ❑ Variety in materials, colors and textures; ❑ Distinctive fenestration patterns; ❑ Building step backs; and ❑ Distinctive roofs forms. e. The proposed development provides for appropriate buffers, enhanced landscape desiQn and appropriate distances between buildings. Community Development Board — August 16, 2011 FLD2010-12033 — Page 6 of 8 COMPLIANCE WITH GENERAL STANDARDS FOR LEVEL TWO APPROVALS: The following table depicts the consistency of the development proposal with the General Standards for Level Two Approvals as per CDC Section 3-914.A: Consistent Inconsistent 1. The proposed development of the land will be in hazmony with the scale, bulk, X coverage, densiry and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage development and use of X adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons X residing or working in the neighborhood. 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. X 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the X immediate vicinity. 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including X visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts on ad�acent ro erties. SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION: The Development Review Committee (DRC) reviewed the application and supporting materials at its meeting of June 07, 2011, and deemed the development proposal to be legally sufficient to move forward to the Community Development Board (CDB), based upon the following: Findin�s of Fact. The Planning and Development Department, having reviewed all evidence submitted by the applicant and requirements of the Community Development Code, finds that there is substantial competent evidence to support the following findings of fact: 1. That the 0.18-acre subject property is located on the east side of Mandalay Avenue approximately 85 feet north of Causeway Boulevard; 2. That the subject property is located in the Tourist (T) District and the Resort Facilities High (RFH) future land use plan category; 3. That the subject property is located within the Retail/ Restaurant District of Beach by Design and is subject to all applicable requirements set forth therein; 4. That the properties were previously developed with retail sales and service and six attached dwelling units. All of the building containing these uses is being demolished; 5. That the proposal includes the construction of 1,899 square feet of retail sales and services floor area, 6,075 square feet of restaurant (Starbuck's and Hooters) floor area, and three parking spaces; 6. That the proposal includes a front (south along Causeway Boulevard) setback of setback of zero feet (to building and sidewalk), a front (west along Mandalay Avenue) setback of zero feet (to building and sidewalk), a side (north) setback of zero feet (to building and sidewalk), and a side (east) setback of 24 feet (to parking); 7. That the proposal includes large expanses of windows, covered and uncovered balconies, overhangs, awnings, sunshades, and finish treatments such as stucco, wood (faux) and horizontal siding; and 8. That there are no active Code Enforcement cases for the subject property. Conclusions of Law. The Planning and Development Department, having made the above findings of fact, reaches the following conclusions of law: 1. That the development proposal is consistent with the Standards as per Community Development Code Tables 2-801.1, 2-802 and 2-803; Community Development Board — August 16, 2011 FLD2010-12033 — Page 7 of 8 2. That the development proposal is consistent with the Flexibility criteria as per Community Development Code Section 2-803.C; 3. That the development proposal is consistent with the General Standards for Level Two Approvals as per Community Development Code Section 3-914.A; and 4. That the development proposal is consistent with the Design Guidelines of Beach by Design. Based upon the above, the Planning and Development Department recommends APPROVAL of the Flexible Development approval to permit Retail Sales and Services of 1,819 square feet of floor area and Restaurants of 6,075 square feet of floor area in the Tourist (T) District with a lot area of 8,074 square feet, a lot width of 74.95 feet on Mandalay Avenue (west), a front (south) setback of zero feet (to building and sidewalk), a front (west) setback of zero feet (to building and sidewalk), a side (north) setback of zero feet (to building and sidewalk}, a side (east) setback of 24 feet (to parking), a building height of 32.47 feet (to flat roo� and 3 parking spaces, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of the Community Development Code (CDC) Section 2-803.C., with the following conditions: Conditions of Approval: 1. That, prior to the issuance of any building permits, all Stormwater conditions be met; 2. That prior to the issuance of any building permits, all Public Utilities conditions be met; 3. That prior to the issuance of any building permits, a narrative is submitted to Traffic Engineering describing how the project will be constructed with respect to the use of adjacent street rights-of-way without lane or sidewalk closures on Mandalay Avenue; 4. That prior to the issuance of any building permits, City of Clearwater at the applicant's expense will remove or relocate any water meters that have to be relocated as part of this development including reclaimed water meters. No water meters shall be located within any impervious area; 5. That prior to the issuance of any building permits, it is demonstrated how a scaled delivery truck enters and exits the delivery space; 6. That prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, five sets of built drawings signed and sealed by a State of Florida Registered Professional Engineer be submitted for review by the Construction Services Inspector; 7. That all open spaces will be landscaped with Florida Grade #1 plant material with an automatic irrigation system; 8. That all utilities, including individual distribution lines, must be installed underground unless undergrounding is not practicable; 9. That electric panels and meters for this development, if proposed to be outside and in view of adjacent rights-of-way and properties be painted the same color as the building; and 10. That any future freestanding signage must be monument-style meeting Code requirements and be designed to match exterior materials and color of the building. Prepared by Planning and Development Department Staff: /�� Matt Jackson, Planner II ATTACHMENTS: Location Map; Aerial Map; Zoning Map; Existing Surrounding Uses Map; and Photographs S: IPlanning DepartmentlC D BIFLEX (FLD)IPending casesl Up for the next CDBIMandalay Ave 385 Hooters Starbucks (C) 2011.Ox - MJ1Staff Report 2011 08-16.docx Community Development Board — August 16, 2011 FLD2010-12033 — Page 8 of 8 Matthew Jackson 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, Florida 33756 (727) 562-4836 matthew.iackson(a�,mvclearwater.com PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE ❑ Planner II Ciry of Clearwater, Clearwater, Florida May 2011 to Present Octobe�� 2008 to June ?O10 Regulate growth and development of the City in accordance with land resource ordinances and regulations related to community development. Landscape plan review including: conceptLial, and variance. Reviews and analyzes site plans and conducts tield studies to determine the integrity of development plans and their compatibility with surroundings. Interdepartmental and zoning assistance. Respond as a City representative to citizens, City officials, and businesses concernii�g ordinances and regulations. Make recommendations and presentations at staff level at various review committees, boards, and meetings. ❑ Planner I Calvin-Giordano and Associates, Fort Lauderdale, Florida May 2005 to December Z007 Project manager for various development applications such as plat, site plan, rezoning and variances. In-depth government agency, in-house and client coordination to ensure that the projects maintained submittal schedules stayed within budget constraints and attained approval. Schedule and lead project kick-off ineetings, ensure municipal project conditions were resolved, produce supparting docuinents and mal<e site visits as well. Research and prepare due diligence reports including subject matter such as zoning, land uses, densities, available public utilities and land development costs. Member of emergency mitigation committee formed to prepare and mitigate for natural or man-made disasters affecting Calvin, Giordano and Associates and local municipalities. ❑ Manager Church Street Entertainment, Orlando, Florida September 1999 to Februa�y ?004 Supervised and managed daytime and nighttime operations of a bar and nightclub entertainment complex including 100+ staff. Conducted hiring and training operations including security and inventory control. Managed and reconciled nightly gross revenues as well as preparing and delivering deposits. Assisted in taking inventory and preparing weekly inventory orders, marketing and special events. ❑ Linguist ZIS Army, Fort Campbell, KY October 1991 to Octobei° 1995 Maintain fluency in the Arabic language and knowledge of customs and culture as well as military readiness for possible deployments or training operations. Co-managed intelligence gathering operation in Haiti including coordination between multiple Special Forces units and civilian authorities. Interpreter between U.S. and Egyptian soldiers during training exercises. Liaison between Special Forces battalions to coordinate certification training. EDUCATION ❑ Master of Arts, Urban and Regional Planning, Florida Atlantic University, 2007 ❑ Bachelor of Arts, Urban and Regional Planning, Rollins College, 2004 �� x., Looking N at the subject property from Causeway Boulevard. Looking N at the subject properry from Causeway Boulevard. Looking E at the subject property from Mandalay Avenue. Looking E at the subject property from Mandalay Avenue 385 Mandalay Avenue FLD2011-06022 e � ��,� � 7 , � � � _ �.-��e,.....,�,,�l�►?: � , �„ . � �, _. _. q. i. !' . � � � i � i � r� ' , a:;..;�? f ♦� ''�.''*�M- -:� `'„ � ' �=H� x � � � "'�:,� �, _ _ _ �, � �. � � i� „� . r" ^�-� � + � .,,� • . - :' .� . —�.. � ' ' .�►� �� _,,.,�, � . ,� � ,.�., �� ,�1 , ,,.�_,,�� t � .. _� . , _ � � � � �� __ ' � ' �� t�M� �:'��t�i�� ?�..�, � � r � � �. �«. '* - '�' j a � tt�� t� — "�"'�� • -' .+� �� ' , ��.- ..� � � � � r i". - �'�� . � . . . � , -�,.,� � � � . ,� � �,,;��, �.�F �, �j;�:..__ _ _ �`i:m= � � ,' . , ��- i � ,. � . ' ; , � � , .y " .�.�.` � t � � , w�° . � �. ,� ;�,.,,: , �� _� � ., t M' ` � �j� � � -��' J� k ; - ; '1`' _. .yN � � � .�;' � *.r;,~� , .� � :. �� - � �; � �F. :�, �`: _ ' ' : : ,� i � :-� = � " _ , . �.,, p ,�'��tA. �; �.. ` - K � - '�j�� .� ,,. '�R� :` � '��R. r � t � �. `! t ��iiY �� i �� f: ? �,� r . . . « r= ,, -_____ „�`� ,J� . s'r. � t_ � G,� , YiT }�; • i ^ ...� _._ . ��, . �, . . • � .� � � � ': �. . � ` . . + .-, � � �' •. r � ��aJ a. C �, �� Q- 'r.� .�;; 4` "� �� 7� � � � � r"'_":'.>.. � h...ecl�++R `'�'� r• : . � � . . � t�. .:� ; �� 1 '� t � C I � �� — r , . I � �' . � rv` � �� ,.- * d � �• . .. . u ��II�'� � �� /` � � + a 1 : y � Z «� � a ! . � •C,.1► , j -�p '� �� I +�4 � � � �� x4+ + ~ � r t � �0. ` { �� , . t� �II � � ° � .c.��iaeae � _ Aerial Map owner: . Interstate Hotels and Resorts Case: i � ' Property site: � 400 Mandalay Avenue � Size(Acres): I�t► Atlas Page: FLD2004-04027 10.03 08/29/15/00000/230/0100 267A Zoning Map Owner: � Interstate Hotels and Resorts I Case: site: 400 Mandalay Avenue I Property I ( Size�Acres): � Atlas Page: FLD2004-04027 10.03 08/29/15/00000/230/0100 267A , ��' ��.�� , w,._.�"�+.�^�.r Planning i?epartment '100 South Myrtfe Avenue Clearwater, Florida 33756 Telephone. 727-562-45B7 Fax; 727-562-4865 � SUBMIT ORlGINAL 51GNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION Q SUBM(T 14 COPlES OF THE ORICINl,� APPLICATIQN - Pians and application are required to be collated, siapfed, and foided into sets ❑ SUBMIT FIRE PREIiMARY SITE PLAN: �24t3.Dfl f1 SUBMIT APPL{CATI�N FEE $ CASE #: RECEiVED BY (staff initials): DATE REGEfVEQ: � NOTE: 15 TOTAL SETS OF INFOi2MATION REQUIRER {APf'LlCATIONS Pl.US 51TE PLAN SETS) FT ��IR�,F TIFVF�QpI�!��Il�'?' ��]PnT �r[ '��'I'��ll� Camprehensive Intill RedeY�elo�ment Project (Re��ise�i fJ7/1112�08) �PL�ASE TYP� OR PRIl�tT� A. A�PLICANT, PROPERTY OWtJER AND AGENT tNFORMATlON: (Code Section 4-2Q2.A) APPLICANT NAME: MAILING A�DRESS: PNONE NUMBER: CELL NUMBER PROPERTY dWNER(5): List ALL owners on the deed 3$7 - 391 Mendalay Ave, LLC (Joseph Kokolakis, Managing I�fember) 202 E. Center S�.reet, Tarpon Spz-ings, FT, 34689 { 727 ) 942-2211 FAX NUMBER: { 727 } 437-5708 _----- _..___._._ EMAIL: �oseph@ikokolakis.com 387 - 391 hfandalay Ave, LLC Housn c;novaee, c:�v AGENT NAME: Northside Engineering Services, Inc. Renee Ruggisro, Senior Projeet Planner --.._._.. -----__.._ MAILING ADDRESS: 300 5. Be].cher Road, Clearwater, FL 33765 —. _.__ ___ . PHONE NUMBER: ( 727 ) 443-2869 FAX NUMBER: (?27 ) 446-8036 CEL�NUMBER: (727) 235-8475 EMAIL: Renee@northsideengineering.net B. PROPOSED D�VELC)PME�1T 1NFORMATiON: (CQde Section 4-202.A} PROJECT NAME: 387 - 391 Fiandalay Ave, LLC PROJECT VAI.UATION: �i 1, 200, 004. Od STREETADDRESS 385 Mandalay Ave. and 387 iiandal�y Ave. Glearwater, Fl 33767 PARCELNUMBER{S): 08-29-15-02542-OQi-0260 and 08-29-15-02592-001-0230 PARCEL SIZE (acresj: 0.185 ( 385 } �. 285 ( 387 j � PARCEL SIZE (square feet): 8, Q74 Sq. Ft. { 385 } LEGALDESCRIPTi�N: Sae �ttached Lega2 Descriptions 8,079 Sq. Ft. (387) PROPOSED USE(S): Retail/Restaurant DESCRlPTlON OF REQUEST: See Attached Y3arrative Specifically identify the request (include number ofi units or square -- - - ------- ---- ---- f�otage of nan-residentiai use and aif requested code deviations; e.g. reduction in requirad number ot -- parking spaces, specific use, eto.) C�\[?ocuments and Settingslderek.iergusonlDesktoplpianning dept forms 07081Comprehensive infili Praject (�LD� 20d8 07-11.doc Page 1 of 8 � DOES TI-f!S APPLfCkTiON iNVOLVE THE 7RANSFER OF DEVELOPME=NT RIGHTS (TDR), A PREViOUS�Y APPROVED PLfINNED UNl DEVELOPtv1ENT, OR A PREVIOUSLY APPfZOVED (CERTIFIED) SITE PLAN? YES _ NO X (if yes, attach a copy of ihe appiicable documents) C. PROOF O�' OWlVERSH(P: (Code Section 4-202.A.5) � SUBMIT A COPY OF THE TITLE INSURANCE POLICY, DEED TO THE: PR4PEFZTY OR SIGN AFFIDAVIT AT'I"ESTING OWNERSHiP {see page 7) Q. WRITTEN SUBMITTAl. REQUIREMENTS: (Cor+� �ac�ion 3-913.A) ❑ Provide complete responses to the six (6} GENERAL APPLICABILITY GR ITERlA — Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail: 1. ihe proposed devetopment of #he Iand will be in harmony w�rh the scale, buik, coverage, density aad character af adjacent properties in which it is iocated. See Attached Narratiue 2. ihe proposed deveEopment u�ill not hinder or discourage the appropriate deveioprnent and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair tl�s value thereof. See Attached Narrativa 3. The proposed development wi(I not adversely affect the health or safety of persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use. See Attached Narrative 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize tra�c congestion. See Attached Narrative 5. The proposed cievelopment is cansis#ent with fhe commun'tty character of t�e immediate vicinity o€ the parcel proposed for development. See Attached Narrative 6. The design of the proposed development rninimizes ad��ers�=.=f�,::�:Cs,'lncluding �isuef, acoustic and olfactory and hours nf cperation impacis, on adjacent properties. See Attached IJarratiiTe C:1Documents and Settings\derek.4ergusonlDesktoplpianning dept {arms 0708\Comprehensive lnfill Pro}ec# (FLt�) 2Q68 07-11.doc Page 2 ot 8 WRiTTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Camprehensive (nfill Redevefopment Pr�ject Cri#eria} 1;,7 Peovide complete responses to the six (6) COMPREHENSIVF fNFILL REC)EVELpPNtENT PROJECT CRITERIA— Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail: 1. The development or redzvelopmes�t is otherwise impractical without deviations from the use and/ar development standards saf farth in this zoning district. See Attached t?arrative 2. The development ar redevelopmenf wii! be consistent with the goals ai�d policies of the Comprehensive Pian, as well as with the genera# purpose, intent and basic planning objectives of this Code, and with the intent and purpose of this zoning district See Attached Narrative ;s. The developmeni or redeveiopment will no� impede the normaf and arderty deve3opment and improvement of surrounding properties. See Attached Narrative 4. Adjoining properties will not suffer subsfantia! detrimen# as a result of the proposed development. See Attached Narrative 5. The proposed use shaii atherw€se be permitted by ihe underlying future (and use category, bs compafible with adjacent land uses, wiil not substantiatly alter the essential use charac#eristics of the neigl�borhood; and shali damonstrate compliance with one or mare of the follovring objectives: a. The proposed use is permitted in this zoning district as a.+r��ws;,r��n standard, flexiale standard or flexible development use; b. The proposed use wouid be a signi€icant economic conirihutor to the City's economic base by diversifying the loca! economy or by creating jobs; a The development proposal accammodates the expansior� or redsveiopment of an existing eca�omic cantributor; d. The proposed use pravides fcr the provision of affordabie housing; e. The propased use provid�s for deveiopment cr redevelopment in an area that is characterized by other similar development and where a land use plan amendment and rezoning woidd resul# in a spot land us� or zoning designation; or f. The propased use provides for the deveinpment of a naw andlor preservafiQn of a working waferfront use. See At�ached Narrative Flexibiiity v�ith regard to usA, iat widih, required setbacks, height and oif-sireei parking are justified based an d�monstrated complianee with alI o# the following design ohjecfives: a. The prapased rfevelopment will not impede the normal and orderly aevalopment and improvement of fhe surrounding properties for uses permitted in ihis zoning district; b. The proposed development compiies with applicable design guidelines adopted 6y the City; c. The design, scale and intensity of the proposed developmerrt supports fhe established or emerging character of an area; d. In order to form a cohesive, uisuaily i�teresting and attractive appearance, the proposed development inco�porates a substanYiai number of the €olfawing design slemenfs: ❑ Changes in horizontal building planes; C] Use of architecYura3 details such as calumns, carnices, sfringcaurses, pi3asters, porticos, taalconies, railings, awnings, efc.; ❑ Variety in materials, colors a�d textures; ❑ Bistinctive fenestration pattems; �] Building stepbacks; and Ci Qistinctive roofs for,�ns. e. The proposed developme�t provides for appropriate bGiffers, enhanced landscape design and appropriate distances between buildings. See P_ttached �iarrative C:iDoc�in�ents and Settings\derek.#erguson\Desktoplp(anning dept forms Q708\Ccmprehensive }nfili Project {FLDj 2008 Q7-11.dnc Page 3 of 8 E. STORMWATER PLAN SUBMiTTAL REQUIREMEN7'S: {City of Glearwater Starm Drainage Design Criteria Manuai and 4202.A.2'Ij � A STORMWATER NARRATfVE MtJST BE SUBMITTEC3 Wli`H ALL APPLICAT10T�tS. All appiications that invoive addition or modification of impetvious surface, inciuding buildings, must inciude: a stormwater plan that demonstrates compliance wiih the City of Ciearwater Storni Drainage Dasign Cri(eria manual. A reduction in imperviaus surfac� area does not quaiify as an exemption to this requirement, ❑ if a plan is not required, the narrative shall provide an expfanation as to why the site is exempt. ❑ At a minirnun�, the STORMWATER PLAN shall include the foIlowing; ❑ Existing topography e�ct�nding 50 feet beyond all property lines; ❑ Proposed grading including ftnished floor elevations of ail structures; CJ All adjacent stree4s and municipal storm systems; l3 Proposed stormwaker detention/refention area including top of bank, toe of slope and outlet contro! structure; ❑ A narraiive describing the proposed storm+n�ater cantro( plan inciuding all calculations and data necessary to den}onstrate compiiance with th� City manual. Q Proposed sformwater defentio�/retention area including top of banu: :se of slope and outiet cantrol structure; C] Signature and seal of Florida Registered Pro€essional Engii�eer at� ali plans and calculations. C7 COPY OF PERMIT iNQUfRY iE3TER flR SQUTHV�iEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT (SWFWMQ) PERMIT SUBMITTAL (SWFVVMD approval is required prior fo issuance of City Bui(ding Permit), if applicable l� ACKNOWLEDG�M�N7 OF STORMWATEt2 PLAh1 REQUiREME1V7S {AppEicant must initial one of the following}: 5tormwater plan as noted above is inc(udsd xG � Sformwater pfan is not required and explanation narraTive� is atfached. At a minimum, a grading plan and finished floor elevations shail be pravided. CAUTION — IF APPLICATiON F2EVIEIN RESULTS IN TiiE REQUIREMENT FUf� A STORMWATER P�.AN AND NON� HAS BEEN SUBi�€IT7ED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTEE7 AND SIGNIFICANT D�LAY MAY OGCUR. If you have questions regarding thssa requirements, contact the City Pubiic Works Administration Engineering DepartmenY a# (727j 562-4750. F. SUPPLEMENTAL SUBMtTTAL REQUlREMENTS: (Code Section 4-2ti2.Aj O S1GN�D AND SEALED SURVEY (including legal description of property) — One original and 14 copies; ❑ TREE SURVEY (induding existing traes an site and within 25' of the adjacent site, by species, size {DBH 4" or greater), and locatian, inciuding drip lines and indica#ing trees to be removed) — please design arour�d ths existing irees; 0 TREE #NVENTORY; prepared 6y a"certified arborisY', of ail trees 4" DBM or greater, reflecting size, canopy {drip lines} and condition of such irees; �i/A Per Rick Albee — i3o T:ree Exist on Site Cl LOCATiON MAP O� THE PROPERTY; ❑ PARKItJG DEMAND STUDY in conjunction with a request to make deviations to the parking standards (ie. f?educe number of spaces). Prior to the suBmittai of this appfication, fhe mathodology of such study strall be appraved by the Gommunity Developmant Coordinator and shail be in accordance with accepted tra�c engineering principies. The findings of the study wiil be used in determining whether or not devisfions to the parking sfandards are approve�; p1ease See Pr�vided Parking Study ❑ GRAQING PLAN, as applicable; ❑ PRELIN#INARY PLAT, as required (Note: Buifdirng permiis wi11 not be issued until evidence of recarding a finai plat is provided); �T�� O COPY OF RECORDED PLAT, as applicable; N/A .....•. °`-` G:\Documents and Setfings�derek.fergusonlDesktoplplanning dept farms 0708iCompreMensive infiA Projecf (F�D] 2008 07-11.doc Page 4 of 8 G. SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENl'S: (Section 4-202.A) ❑ SITE PLAN with the following information (not to exceed 24" x 36"): Index sheet referencing individua! sheets induded in package; � North arrow; Engineering bar scale (minimum scale one inch equals 50 feetj, an� date preparad; Ali dimensions; Footprint and size of ail EXISTING buildings and structures; ��ootprint and size of all PROPOSED buildings and structures; � All required setbacks; All existing and proposed points ofi access; � Aii required sight triangles; T identification of environmentaiiy unique areas, such as watercaurses, wetiands, tree masses, and specime� trees, including _ description and iocation of understory, ground cover vegetation and wiidlife habitats, etc; Location of all public and private easements; Location of al! street righis-of-way within and adjacent to the site; � Location of existing public and private utilities, inciuding fire hydrants, storm and sanitary sewer lines, manholes and lift stations, gas and water tines; All parking spaces, driveways, loading areas and vehicular use areas; �� Depiction by shading or crosshatching of all required parking lot intertor landscaped areas; Locaiion of all solid waste containers, recycling or trash handling areas and outside mechanical equipment and aii required screening _ {per Section 3-201(D)(i} and Index #701}; Location of all landscape materiaf; Location oF all onsite and oflsife storm-water management facilities; Location of all outdoor lighting iixtures; No Outdoor Lighting Proposed at This Time Location of aIt existing and proposed sidewalks; and Fioor plan typicals of buildings for all Level Twa approvals. A fioor plan of each f{oar is required for any parking garage requiring a Level Two approval. ❑ SITE DATA TABLE for existing, required, and proposed development, in written/tabular iorm: EXISTING REL2UIRED PROPflSED Land area in square feet and acres; ---- _-------- --- __------._.._ Number of EXISTI�JG dwelling units; S�E SITE DATA TABLE Number of PROP05ED dweliing units; -- -- -- ----------- Gross floor area devoted to eacn use; Parking spaces: total number, presented in tabular form with the number of required spaces; — -. ..---------- -....._____ Totai paved area, including all paved parking spaces & driveways, expressed in square feet & percentage of the paved vehicular area; Official records book and page numbers of ali existing utility easement; � - _ _ _ - ----- ---.� Building and structure heights; lmpermeable surface ratio (I.S.R.); and Floor area ratio (F.A.R.) for al! nonresidential us�s. 0 REDUCED COLOR SITE PLAN to scale (8 Yz X 11); ❑ FOR DEVELOPMENTS OVER ONE ACRE, provide the following additio�al information on site pian: N/A Less Than an Acre One-foot contours or spot elevafions on site; Offsite elevations if required to evafuate the proposed stormwater management for the parcei; All open space areas; Location of all earth or water retaining wails and earth berms; Lot lines and building lines (dimensioned); Streets and drives (dimensioned}; Building and structurai setbacks (dimensioned); Structural overhangs; C:\Documents and 5et#ingslderek.fergusonlDesktopiplanning dept forms 0708\Comprehensive Intill Project (FLD) 2008 07-11.doc Page 5 of 8 H. LANDSCAPfNG PLAN SUBMiTTAL REQUfREMENTS: (Section 4-9102.Aj No Landscaping Proposed at This Time ❑ LANDSCAPE pLAN with the following information (not to exceed 24" x 30"1: per Robert Tefft Landscape Comp Infill All existing and proposed strucYures; Names of abutting streets; Not Required Drainage and retention areas including swales, side slopes and boi;om elevations; �� Delineation and dimensions of ali required perimeter landscape buffers; 5ight visibility triangles; � a Delineafion and dimensions of all parking areas including landscapinq islands and curbing; Existing trees on-site and immediately adjacent to the site, by species, size and locations, inciuding dripiines (as indicated on required tree survey); Location, size, and quantities of all existing and proposed landsc:ape materials, indicated by a key reiating to the piant schedule; � Plant schedule wifh a key (symbol or labei) indicating the size, description, speci#ications, quantities, and spacing requirements of ail _^ existing and proposed landscape materials, induding botanical and common names; Typical pianting details for trees, palms, shrubs and ground cover plants inc}uding instructions, soil mixes, backfilling, mulching and prolectiv� r77easures; Interior landscaping areas hatched and/or shaded and labeled and interior landscape coverage, expressing in both square feat and percentage covered; Conditions of a previous devetopment approvai {e.g. condifions imposed by the Community Qevelopment Board); Irrigation notes, ❑ REDUCED COLOR LANDSCAPE PLAN to scale {$'/� X 11 j; ❑ COMPREHENSlVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM appiicafion, as applicable. Landscapa associated with fhe Comprehensive Landscape Program shall exceed minimum Code requirements to offset the areas wnere minimum Code wili not be met. N/A Per Robert Tefft - No Comp Landscape Program App. req'd as zero setback provides no landscape I. SUtLDING ELEVATlON PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A.23) ❑ BUiLDING ELEVATION DRAWiNG5-with the following information: AII sides of all buiidings Dirnensioned Colors (provide on2 full sized set of colored elevations) Materials ❑ REDUCED BUILDING ELEVATIONS - same as above #o scale on 8'/ X 11 J. SiGNAGE: (Division 19. SIGNS / Section 3-1806) rro siynaye Proposed At This Time ❑ All EXISTING freestanding and attached signs; Provide photographs and dimensions (area, height, etc.j, indicate whether they will be removed or to remain. ❑ All PROPOSED freestanding and attached signs; Provide details inciuding location, size, height, colars, materials and drawing; freestanding signs siiall inciude the street address (numerals) f� Comprehensive Sign Program application, as appiicabie {separate application and fee required). C! Reduced signage proposal (8 %z X 11) (color), if submiiiing Comprehensive Sign Program appiication. C1Documents and Settingslderek.fergusonlDesl:toplpianning dept fortns 07081Comprehensive Infill Project (FLD) 2Q08 67-11.doc Page 6 of 8 K. TRAFFIG IMPACT STUDY: (Section 4-202.A.13 and 4-801.C) ❑ Include if required by the Traffic Qperations Manager or h;s/her desie^�e or if fha proposed development: please See Pzovided Traf£ic Impact Study � Will degrade the acceptabie level of service for any roadway as adopted in the Comprehensive Pian. • Will generate 900 or more new vehicle directional trip� per hour and(or 1000 or more new vehicle trips per day. � V1411 af%ct a nearby roadtvay segment and/ar intersection with flve (5j reportabie accidents within the prior tw�ive (12) month period or that is on the City's annual Iist of most hatardous intersectians. Trip genera#ion shall be based on the most recant editior� of the lnstitute of Transportation Engineer's (ITE) Trip General fi�lat�uai. The Traffic Impact Study must be prepared in accordance with a"Scoping Meeting" held with the Traffic Operations Manager and the Plar�ning Department's i]evelopment Review Manager or their designee (727-582-4750) Refer to Section 4-801 C of #he Gomm.fnity Develaprnent Code for exceF�tions to this requiremenY. ❑ Acknowledgement af traffic impaci study requirements jApplican# must initia( one of the following): � �C2�C ��T��,Ct Srti�j� IS ii �CiiluBt�. Tirc SiUuj+ iiiii8� Ii3G�Uuc a SLi�Tiilla('�+ i6�iiE Gi pr�- and pust-del=e1cN��,enT levels oi scivii:e ior aii �R roadway �egs and each turning movement at all interssctians ideniified in the Scoping Meeting. Traffic hnpacY Study is not required. CAUTION — 1� APPL.iCAiIt�N REVtEW RESULTS IN THE REQUtREMENT F�R A TRAFFlG IMPACT STUDY AND NaP1E HAS BEEN SllBMtTTED, APPL1CATlON MUST BE RESUBMiTTED ANU S[GNIFIGANT QELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contaet the City P�.�blic V1JOrks Administratian Engineering Dapartment at (727) 562- 4750. L. F1RE FL�W GALCULATlQNSI V1lATER STUDY: Provide Fire Fiow Caicuiations. Water Study by a FIRE PROTECTION ENGINEER to assure an adequate water suppiy is available and to determine if any upgrades are required by the developer due #o the impack of khis project. The watsr supp3y must be abie to support lhe needs af any required fire sprinkler, standpipe and/or flre pump. if a fre pump is required the water supply must be able to supply 950% of its rated capacity. Con7pijancs with the 2004 Florida Fire Prevention Code to include NFPA 13, MFPA 14, NFPA 2D, NFPA 291, and MFAA 1142 (Annex H) is requirad. D Acknawledgemerat af fire f(ow calcuiationslGVater study requirements (Applicant must mitial one of the foilowing)_ HG ��rs Flow Ca(culationsN4raier Study is incfuded. �'lease See Provided xydrant Flow Test Results Fire Fiow Ca(culationslWater Study is not required. CAUTtON — i� APPLECAT'IOIV REViEW f��i�i. �S IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A FIRE FLOW GAL.CULATIONS/ WATER STUDY AND tVf3iVE HAS BEEN SUBMiTTED, APPLICATION MUBT BE RESUBMlTTED AND SlGNIFiCANT DELAY M�Y CICCUR. ff you have questions regarding #hese requirements, contact tha City Fire Preventian Departmenf at {727} 562-4334. M. SfGNATUFZ�: i, ihe undersignad, acknowiedga that al! representations made in this�application are true and accurate to the besf of my know��ge and authorize City representatives ta visif and phot aph the properfy described in this appiicatian. of proper#y owner or rspresen#ative STATc OF FLORlDA, COUNTY OF PINELLf� Sv✓om to and subscribed before me this ��%i'day of A.D. 20��__ io me and/or by �, �/,� � wha is personaily known has producsd � � . �,. . as identification. w"� ' � — Notary pubiic: My commission expires: �+iy��',% °a�,� � j � _ � p.�pRY P�e C:\Documen#s and Settingslder�k.f�rgusnniDesktoplplanning clept fonns 07fl81 ptekSensive Inf�AkRfa�j,��',LD) 2008 07-11.doc Page 7 of 8 zt * F,�YCQ�1ra1SS10N�QQ949$32 N,' 9� EXPIRES: b�ay 3, 2014 rF�,F f�o�` 8onded Thru Budged Notary Sarvices 0 N. AFFIDAVIT TO AUTNC)RIZE AGENT: 1. Provide names of aI) property oivners on deed - PRINT fuli names: 387 - 391 idandalay Ave, LLC 2. That Q aml4ve are) the owner(s) and record tilie holder(s) of the following described prope�ty {address or general location): 365 and 387 Mandalay Avenue, Clear�y�ater, FL 337fi7 3. That this property conslitutes the property for which a request for a; (describe request) Approvai of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Application to construct a new commerc4al development with a loading zone on 387 Mandalay 4. That the unQersigned (has/have) appoinfed and (does/do} appoint: Housh Ghovaee, CEO and Renee Ruggiero, Sen?_ur Project Planner - Northside Engineering Services as (hisltheir} agent(s) to execute any peiitions or othe; documents necessary to affect such petition; 5. That this affdavit has been executed to induce the City of Cleanvater, Florida to consider and act on ihe abova described property; 6. That sita visits to the praperty are necessary by Gity representalives in order to process this application and ihe owner authorizes City representatives to visit and phot�ra� #he property described in this appiication; � 7. That (Uwej, the unde�ne�j�hority, hereby certify that the for�g�ing is true and correct. - -. aS�tK`.(. �KU,•_; Propsrty Ov,�ner STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS Property Property Owner ��- Before me the undersigned, an o�cer duly commissioned by the laws of the 5ta#e of florida, on fhis �� " day of _-!� P l'�__ , �(j_� �_ personaliy appeared ��i �\, � 1��,�j who having been First duly swom f �', --- --- De poses/ a n d s a y s t h a t h e l s h e f u l l y u n d e r s t a n d s t h e c o n i e n t s o f t h e � t� a v i t t h a t h e/ s h e s i g n e d. 1 All;�si—��L�A;! ,li';�� i. �� ..� � � �.t�ii,� `�� ..- .� �r ' �� J.�. � �'�':If l –' --- � t ,�i � .,..lt�[! -.-i � 1.._�; , ''? �— �ri..� . _ . .,_ — .._�._..__' �' 4 i�.`�� 1�, ��t?1�.� NoaryP bli 5ignaiure (iCh L.�i ritt t._Ti3 1�l3UP� r� GCO,I'�'. Notary Seai/Siamp My Commission Expires: C:\Documents and Settinqsiderek.farguso�tDesk;on\planning dept forms 07061Camprehensive Infili Project (FLD) 2008 D7-11.doc Page 8 of 8 LETTER Q F' �4,UTH O RIZAT! ❑ N This letter will serve as auth�rization fior Housh Ghovaee (agent Name) with Northside Enqineerinq Services, Inc. to act as an agent for ��' 7- �� (Property Owner's Name) � And to execute any and all documen#s related to securing permits and approvals for the construction on the property generally located a# 365 and 387 Mandalay Avenue, Clearwater, FL 33767 (Property Location) PINELLAS Caunty,�-�#�#e of FL�RIDA. Signa�efre�R oc.��t,y Owner �� . ��' � i�j U�-'�ill, ��j,.'�j �7" Address of Property �wner i;� .�:-'.�,��-r �� 3/G S=� CityiState/Zip Code �_------ �r.S'�'p/�f � f%a/��u1�-Ci J' Print Nam�f Property �wner / F7�✓ .JL �Z/�1" "'i� Titf e �.� �- �t�:�_ � 2 � � Telephone Number State of ' t�' 'C ' The fareq�;n� ?sfstrument was acknowledge before me this � 7� day County of l�%•LC�-5 of ��`(A��, 20�, by,1�_ itG��(c�fnt.;S , as '�� tJr- : . _. _-. ,..,,__. . �� who i�personally known tg� me or who has praduced �._____..__ _�_. _.. as identification and who di (did not} take an aath. ,. , '��_�: � 't' i �� 'i ��1 ILC°'�1i10 � �' � l . I>�t�t �i�- -..... li. t�� IU�i tt��)�t17v% r '{� r jG ,"!Ii tt�, �t�l? r�,� -�� f - Notary Pubiic tt� r,F��.L Ittt;ildi7fLri1Ct3trttlDrhGC�.,INC. {Signature) (SEAL ABUVEj Commission # � � � � �� (Name of Notary Typed, Prin#ed ar Stamped) ?#- 20 0327778 EK: 17093 PG: 1556, 11/19/2D10 at d2:47 PM, RECORDING 2 PAGES �$i8.50* D DOC STAMP COLLECTION $14000.00 ECEN BURKE, CLERK OF COURT PSNELT�C CpUNTY, FL BY DEPUTY CLERK: CLKDMC3 PREPARED BY AND RETURN TO: STEPHEN O. COLE, Esquire Macfarlane Ferguson & McMullen 625 Court Street, Suite 200 Post Office Box t669 (3375� Cleanvater, Fiorida 33756 .� l 1 1 4 1 i 1 1 ' - _ 1 1 \` . `, � 1 � ,, . , , `, �, , �� ,, „ � ' ,� � � -- J ,, WARRANTY DEED ; � `, �, �, � � ; , , THIS INDENTURE made this �'day of November, 2010, between KDHW, LLC, a `-� Florida limited (iability company, having its principal ptACe of business in the Codnt� of Pinellasf � State of Fiorida, Party of the First Part, whose mailing address is: 10 Bay;ESplanade, C�leamdaZer, 1 L 33767, of the Coanty of Pinellas, in the State of Florida, and 387-391 MAt�'IiA,Y.;4I'�1.VENUE, ,� LLC, a Ftorida limited liability company, Party of the Secqnd Pait; ,wl�ose mailing address is: -. ,', 202 F.sist Center Sireet, Tarpon Springs, FL 34589, '�, l � , � , "� �, � �� „ � W I T N E�S,S E T,I-i:, ' ___ .' `. , That the said Party of the Ficst P�rt, fdK az�d in consideration of the surn of Ten Dollazs ($10.00) to it in hand paid by the,said Part3� of t�ie �4econd Part, the receipt whereof is hereby . , acknowledged, has granted, basgaine�ci ��sold to the said Party of the Second Part, fo�ver, the foliowing described landj situate lyinga�d b�irig in the County of Pinellas, State of Florida, to-wit: � ,� � '. � Luts 26, 27 ahd'28; B�o2tc:4 of BARBOUR-MORRe`3ei^� SUB7)MSION, according to the �isp�or-p�at t�iereof ss recorded in Plat Book 2:,, page -a5, public records of Pieellas �'oun�;� lorida _ ; Suliject to �(}f l real estate taxes> restrictions, reserva!ions and easements of record. � � , Parcel I�D: No. � 08-29-15-02592-001-0260 , ,� , And the said Party of thc First Part does hereby fully warrant the tiUe ta said land, and wil! defend the same against the lawfiil ciaims of all persans whomsocver. FINELx'�,S COUNTY FL OFF. REC. BK 17093 FG I557 TN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said Party of the First Pazt has caused these presents to be signed in its name by 'sts Manager Member, the day anci year first above written. Signed, Scaled and D�livered K!?HW, LLC, a Florida limited liability in Our Prese ce: ' company � �� Y;-'��lj1M1ti4LL�-----��"'�^'� �S�f�.,� rint Name r� /� � �+ � Kenoeth G. Hamiltoa, Manager Member Print ,� �i ,� �, i 1 - _ i i � ". _ .. `, �� .� ,� .-- � J ��\ � � i i . 4 � ` � i � i . �� i + . -� �� -- ,',' _ _ , , ', �, `�� , �, .` �, , STATE OF FLORIDA C�UNTY OF PINELLAS � , ; ,; I HEREBY CERTIFY that before tne pecsonallY appe�ed �Nt�i�'i`� G. HAMILTON, as Manager Member of KDHW, LLC, a Florida aunited Ii��Zility cottipany, to me [?Q personally knorvn or j ] who has produce� `; �. '. ` as identificatioa and known to me to be the person described in �nci"; �no?execut�d ih� fpregoiz�g instru- ment, and acknowledged the eacecution ihereaf to be his free acY and deed as �uc� manager, for ti�e uses and p�uposes therein expressed, and the said instxumenA i�! the act aneE deed'bf said company. , �� , �, , , WITNESS my hand and off ciat seai at Clea}water ,said Gaunby a`nd State, this L1'�tiay of November, 201 Q. � �. ` � - , \ , ``� tJ , ,`,� I�otary Publ � �Print Name _ ` My Commission Expires: ' • '� !' 3 R \ � / { � , � � i � \ � � _ — r f _ . �` �{ v 4� � i _ � �� A:Wri�komYkiiVwrnnf daddx ,as+ pioqry pup�c Sfa� d fiarids aP � gMpMn O Cde �.� �►Ay Canmisuat OD420244 p�pini PB" 9M011 I�: 2010132952 BK: 16914 PG: 2510, 05/13/2010 at �1:16 P;M, RECORDING 1 PAGES $10.00 D LK}C STAMP COLLECTION $8400.00 KEN BURKE, CLERK OF COURT FINE�LAS COUNTY, FL BY DEPUTY CLERtt: CLKDMO$ ll�yL, j,r�Lr PREPARED BY & PLEASE RETURN 70: DAV1Q BROWQER JR., ESQ. 3Q5 S. Durtcaa Av�. C�wAr��, FL 33755 YVarranty Deed Ttas I+�t�ru�, EFFECTIVE rNns �pqY � MAY, 2010, BetwEEta HOAitER PROAERTtES, ENG., ,', - FoRr��r x�ww �s HONIER REALTY COMPA�tY, m F�t�ato�► Cor�u�, wtiosE aoD�ss is: 2848 �+r WEStEVnN Dt�, Pa,ua Hnrtsat, FL 34684� HEREtN REFERRED TO AS `c�artrat", Arao 387•3.41 ', `, MANAALAY AVENUE, LLC� A FLOft�A LIi�IfiED L446fUTY COMPANY, WNOSE AQQRESS IS: 202 EAST CENTER ,�=;;'�`. STREEi, TARPON SPRINGS, FL 34$$9� liEREiN REFERF�O TQ AS ��RAHTEE'. �•, �� , , ". � , �� WiTN£SSEiH f1iAT iHE SA4b GRANTOR, FoR ataQ �� cot�sir�wmoN oF 'n� suM oF TEN DOLLARS (S10.OQj �� ;' AND OTF�R GOOD AND YN.tlABLE CONSI�RATION i0 SAID GRANTOR iN }UWD PAtD 8Y THE SAID GRANTEE, THE� ,�___.'�� RECEtPi YVhiEREO� tS HERE6Y Att�MMOWt.EDGEQ, HA5 GiiAt�tTED, BAF2GAlNED AI� SOLO 70 TFt� SAID 6RANiEE, AND �__, GRANTEE$ NEfR5 AND ASSIGNEES FOREVER, T1iE FfM.lQ1MNG �SGRIB�p LANQ, SITUATE, LYING AND BEiNG IN PENEU.AS CikIMtY, FLORIDA, raw�r. � , . LOTS 23, 24, � 25, BLpC}( A, BARBOUR-MORROW SUB�IYISiON, R��1t�6 7tTTkt� i� oR PLAT THEREO� AS RECORDEQ IN PLAT B4QlC 23, Pac� 45 c� �t►5 �F?uauC F{�� d� Pitt��tAs COtlNTY, FLORtDA. �' + � `� _ `� PRO�ftrr APt�,vse�'s P�tc�# 08t29J9510259211QOf/02�t1' _ . , ', � "� , � , `„ , , � , AND SAtD fRNNTOR �5 HFREBY FtM1.Y WARRANT THE TiF��TO�SJiID IAND, �ND iMLl, pEFEND TliE S+4ME AGAiNSi LAWFiJL CL4EMS � All PERSCM+iS WHOMSOEVER: �E1S US�41t+1 TNiB �ISTRt?hfEMT THE WORBS "GRANTOR" ANd `GRANTEE" ARE USEQ F�2 BOTH SINGUTAR AND P.L1KiAt AS T�{£ CLiNFFcXT REQCIIRES. . 't . IN WiTMESS WHEREOF, 6RANTQR HAS NERE4J!'170 SEi �Rr4NTORS Hflt�O AND SEAL 71iE DAY AMD YEAR F(RSi A80VE 4YfiiTTEN. �; _ SIGNEO, SENCED, AND DEUVERED !N OUR PR�SETI(2E: R HOMER r�R�PERTlES, INC. W " Da , ', r.� ' �Y ,,�.. 55: �t R. R�€o�R- �;� ROBERT C. HQ �R PRE�oetrr ._...� - - cw�w�t�t STATE OF FL'9R[99 ; ' - -+_ ,' � , COUMY O�Pit�Lt�S ` ' ' - �. THE FOR�GOiNf3 iNSTRUMENT wns nC�ic�.�oc�o ae�� ME Tttts � DAY OF M1fiAY, 20tQ,�av R � 0. HQ ,as PR�StDe�rr oF HQMER Pi2QPERTIES, INC.. n F�owQn Go�ORAttoH, WHO i5 SONd4�LY 0 ME QR WHQ HAS PROIXlGED AS tDENTIFICAilON AqWOWl.EDGEO TO ME THAT ME EXECUiEp THE F�iEG�NG FOR Th1E PURFOSES EXFRESSED Tt�fjE . ��L�`�f� NOTARY FUBLiC, STATE t7F FLORIDA �AY C01�iMISSlCNI EXPiR�S: NAt�lE: My Serial No.: 9� � �r�� „� �,�� .� i� ,� ,� „ - _, , _ --,' , ,, '. . �� ,r . ., '� , ', , �� .� .1 � � a 0 a` 0 `�} a' LE�AL DESCR/PT/ONrJ 385 MANDA�AY AVE. �DEVEL4PMENT S�TE} LEGAL DESCRIPTIC�N L�TS 26, 27 AND 28, BLOCK A, BARBaUR—MORROW SUBC�IVISfON, AC��RDING TO THE MAP OR PLAT TNERE�F AS RECORDED IN PLAT BO�JK 23, PAGE 45, OF THE PUBLIC REC�RDS OF PINEL�AS COUNTY, FL�RIDA. 387 �AN DALAY AVE. ��C}ADING ZC�NE LOCATICJ�� •• �- LOTS 23, 24 AND 25, B�OCK A, BARB�}UR--MORROW SUBQIVISI�N, ACCCJRDiNG TO TNE MAP OR P�AT TNEREOF AS REC�RDED IN PLAT BOOK 23, PAGE 45, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS (�F PINEL�AS C�UNTY, FLORIDA. p�/27/2f�11 �8:19 ,2%56?�961 �'1.��! IC UTILITIES PQ�aE �1 �� i�'�. ► ! �� c. � �.�_�'".�`*_../��...f'�._/�ti.✓'��-,....'' �t-1� tVI��A�� CiTY UF CLEARWA`f'�i� t PUB�iC UTfLIT1�S 1650-� ARGTURAS A�lE. N. CL�AF�WATER, �L. 3��5 PNOi�� (727) 562-49�p FAX (727} 562-�963 � 1 � "i� . ! � . , 1 ., LOGAT((�N; FAX NUMBER: ��,,�• �� T �ROM: � * �+G�!� DAT�: �► Z`7 �� TiM�: ^, �"•�► l�► REMAR.��; � �� . � , � �� N��MB�R aF PACC�S (�NC�Uf�ING THtS Gf��ER Pq�� 512?/2a11 �8:19 ?'!75E2�9b1 PUBLIC UTILITIES P�GE @2 � �� .p }� � � �,agfi 1 F �1� L�f f�� .. C/2arlNc��t" � j�� f�€ay 24,_Oi i l 17.:3 i u U �-t�,�.rant T�`st icivicc t`�i-cl�,r — � , . -- .. �. �� Crc.t�t4�l y I3IiA.N15TZ Ra } � :,.�,��n ° I � � (a. ' � � I t� � �' I � �circ��1 Cocl�: FH�'�+`T . - a i i i..._ c� � I ' j ' � nd � � 4 � .. i I' ( ,� f F�=fective 1�<<t�,: �'1� T-��-2011 � l 02 T 79 �� ;�i��,�= U,{ I i � ,. � . ��I�.i��r�� II ._ .. . ... _ . ... ,. ... � �_. ..... . .. .� �* 1 1 0 2 i 7 � .� ,._..... .. .. .... . . lllSt.rt}]liilU71: l��s'�.'�Fi� ,� C'llstOt��cr- 212�S4c�2 _ I'v�1RTHSLC)T�� FT�T{;INI�L•:1t.iN�'r ,�.iEP�V[C:�S, .� Ph�?11e numbc:r(s); T3U� 72 , a-E3-2RG9 ._. _ ' . _ �i _ �OR'I 1-t5iI7E �Nt;iNf:l?R(NG S��C#'VIC�S. tNC � I Account� 417914. -- � - • 1�13:1 � C:ott1�,E�nc; N,pCI�'nr�.d .�N,i r1�1�rrJain}° -,N'�„-tlts �ci� Err,� �5'4�� <<t;ntr�c� �2e�tc` lit.r�_�;ir�.-„ 7?i-?}5-�Y�l. j l'cl $_ii1 fnr� oitC ht'dr�;ar�[ �� .��:�'� � ' �--`� �� . � � E5127f2�21 E��:1� ?"?755?��3oi �#�I�R�I'C �L�J�r7 fiE��' ��jg� UTIL,TT�' C:'�7�T�1?4'�T7. 5�1�.��C'�. F�BLIG UTILITIES �AG� fl3 'I'i7 W�bt� :�t .�++!(ii� �'t'�r3w-c�7: T'7oa�e cnm�let� th� f�.(:icr�R�i;� info;t�r��,tinn i,�3c:��Ji�o �+..iz�dx,Ic a. �,ydr�nt f7o�� a:��t. T`�i!� :�t;,t�T ��[ ��,c i� ��%.�'Q :c�z� �,��:�� I�s��. �� ;t�c, � �at[t.��.x�y 1W��n.e� ��,,,,� o R,Y.�„ �';��., �r•.�i tz �:.�...r°i n.� ��; �-�--� "�'r.5c�� 1 g.`a�t� ni �,�Fdrun� �r��: ;;tt� hc. e�-yt�r�ri �y '�V�tsr .�3�pfi.,j . ��;��s�� A�!�a-��s; �e�� 4 �-��.t�,..__r-- �� . ��o�rz��r � � t . � � `�(.�.�'� {:.'t??Ttt��'� �i+��',�,f?:Ct: ��^� r`��s�. �' {y �j � �. z- � s .`�,}'c` � ;,� � •�� ,-�- ��r-r.r^��.�rr - - Jt..1 �`e�Q�hi�t��.znber; `�:�-�1� �-{�.�''�' �,�-�1-��t �o�#',z�) �7'�`� r �-��.. �tE'IS �r�6, �� F�x �,��n�Qz-z ��`�-�i �- `� �� L� � ��3 C� T�yt3x�rat �7 1„��tr�� ` . rtz-n� a.i��►n: _ . � n� � �� rIy�ir-�a� �f2 i�n�a�ir�r� , , r � �1��{} �#RtT¢7�r ��C�I'��f r'`�J �t)��i�:"�t7Lt J�%1��43[��l�+Yt. �,��ra�f t�4 !�►q�tin�t �rifvrm�t�o�: Si,nc:�.ee�t� ; f' /`�� , , , ; � � . f -- r �v' f, � ,�`�...� � � _ _�. L,..� k � °� � �� F�5!2lI2Et11 F��:19 7^7��9c1 � C� � � ��t�j,�' N Y cn i� `Nf �� ` r�t �j. ��'L3 1/�� '7` � �.^.. . ,_.. . �- . t � � tq , `�t b'/�C„L��d PUBLIC UTIiITIES P�GE �4 � ' � '1 � � i ■ + � � �" � i i i , � y� � � i � � , ( � � � �, i ; i : �, g ' I , �i' p i to ' �1: .�' i ; 4 , , _ --. ...... •'��c:�-at-'�— .- -- . ..-ti * � _ ...,� .._ ; ; i t ' ' � � I � i l i ' ' ' l ' � ,� � � � � �; ; '� : 4� �� , e ; � ; i ; � � 1 ' �� i , ; } il� ,r j i i ; � .QI � � �( , � ;� � �; � ; � : �� s � ; , ��,,� �..�r,r i i i � � �' i D� �� I 1� i i I E t i I � i s � � ; � h i� f E � � I i � V�} ;� � � '� � � i . , { . j � 7 � i � i 1 ' � �� I : 1 ( � I � , 1' ; 1 1 t � i! } ; i � : V t i � m. �k 3 � k � , . �'] - � , r j r .T � � i L� �, , ) ` �� i t �'! t�. ��: � � : _r � , ,�' ',r �, T- 'o- � =r� �? +.� � y � �,. A _'1, l ' V+ � f+0 �-�,_,.-.� �� I V�i7�V `�/ a� i i M ,,,�'.l. � .. . . . -.,�-. .�- ._. .,__._ �.� v v . � , t � t � � � 4 �� '"� � I �� `� t ��ry '.,i � 1 ± �...-1 ' .. � � *-4fs } ! �, � � \ +�,�?. `{ � Q. ; I,T 4 K� V9 K.,�{ i i) �1 i ��+,,, j H(i .� � � ( i i �+ i f ; � i ' `^'r'. � i� ! I ' 1 � �� ,. , � �; � i� I i 1 � i E i �° ° �{ 1 � t 4 � l f� I i � � 7 I I i i�.I� .,� . ! i I Irtil � � 7 � '._�7 � � s � , { i I : � � ,� �, ':� �, . i j i i � � ! ;, � �.`,�,.,�/ ; ,, � ,�` i � . �I�� _ l�� ',' ; , ��x if, t 't i 's ' t, ; � � =4, i ' � . t`c� � ' ; <v� '`i. a' , !t F' i ■.i �Gn • � �y . � �rC�, Lt1 `�Y — � , j 1 � i�� ' r.l \ �5t27/2�11 �8:19 7?75624961 PUBLIC UTILITIES P�aGE �5 DATE aF TE$T S'TATI�: R�SlC1UAL P13QT ��ow �'L�1N TE�T CITY OF CLEARINATER WATEFt b�PAFtTMENT FSI PSi �4' � P51 GPM E�7 ��° -�t ��U � �� 0 � �ri� �� /l„� �j 'Ir'`�`�-'� � � � '� -�' i�l , �� ", � STi1MER R�QU�STI�i ,f.� 1'EST � �� .��. ::. � � L '�Lf�{'vlt'f.�iR��I�Y° �k.3i�f��f��a�(.,a�fiy 1trl�`, :rL�ly 13, zol l City of Clearwater :� Planiling & Development Review Department Matthew Jackson, Planner II 100 S. Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, rlorida 33756 � u`', _ i; IZE: FLD2011-06022 — 385 Mandalay Avenue 387 — 391 Mandalay Ave, LLC. Dear Mr. Jacicson, Civil I_�tnd f'lanning Due Diligence Repores IZr-Z.oning, I_and Usc�, Annexaeion St�rrnw��cer �'lana�ernent Utilicy fac:sigi7 Traffir (�onseriir.tion Adrninistracion Below please find our responses to the DRC comments associated with the above referenced project: En�ineerin� Review Prior to Building Permit: Comments from Public Utilities: 1. Reclaimed water should be available for irrigation for this site. To verify the location contact Milce Vacca (Public Utilities/Reclaimed WTR 727-562-4960, x7213). NES Resnonse: Acknowledged, should irrigation be required for the site reclaimed vvater will be utilized. 2. City Water meters and DDC should be located as close to the water main as possible. Water equipment under over-hangs will be difficult to install and service. �,�,^°, -.°; , NES Resn�nse: Per discussion at DRC tl�e DDC (and meters) will be located within the ROW to avoid pl�cement under over-hangs and/or l�al�onies. 3. Existing water main very deep, and wet. Other Utilities are crowded in with our water main. This will need to be de-watered along with a trench box by contractor. NES Resnonse: We hereby aci�nowledge the existing water mains are deep and wet requiring de- watering and a trench box. Please see Note on Civil Sheet C41. 4. What size are the three water meters coming ofFthe two inch service line? NES Response: Please see Civil Sheet C4.1 for the proposed meter sizes associated with the project. 30(� Soi.itli E3r-lnc�r• Ro�i�l CIG;�trwr:rr.f.>.i; F�Ic�rid,x 3:�76�i r.c.e.l� ct iinrtltside�.=.r��;inrc,i�in�;s�i-vict:s.coin �l �% 4�G� �. �/Y�I�fii E'""]*1 ! I I �il��\ t51 i�f'� 1 En�ineerin� Review Prior to Bt�ilding Permit: 1. The City of Clearwater, at the applicants expense.will remove or relocate a11y water meters that have to be_relocated as part of this development incl�.iding rerl�imed water meters. No meters shall be located. within any irnpervious areas. , NES Response: Acknowledged, applicants is r�sponsible to remove or relocate any water meters that have to be relocated as part of this deve��ap�ent including reclaimed water meters and further acicnowledge, meters shall not be located vvitliin impervious areas. Please see note added to revised Civil Sheet C4.1 �� Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy: 1. Applicant shall submit 5 sets of as built drawings that are signed and sealed by a State of Florida Registered Professional Engineer. The Construction Services Inspector will field inspect as built drawings for accuracy. NES Response: Acknowledged. Environmental Review 1. DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. Please Note: An asbestos Survey is usually required prior to conducting any demolition or renovations. Please contact Pinellas County Air Quality (464-4422) for further information. NES Response: Acicnowledged, addition�l comments may be forthcoming based upon submittal of a Building Permit Application and asbestos survey will be required the proposed demolition and/or renovations. Fire Review 1. Plan shows the dumpster less than 10' feet from,e�clr of the building(s) meeting on June 20, 2011 with JW Smith Archiiect will malce this a two (2) �,�i'aur�separation with fire sprinkler system designed into it. ARCHITECT Response: Dumpster encl�saure to be 2 hr. rated covered with a roof and sprinlcled. 2 �_�:: 2.� Plai� shows the f`ire depai-�ment connection. and the fire hydrant, an additional hydi�ant will be reqi�ired wi�hin 300' on the same side of the street. ACKNOtiVLEDGE PRI�3R TO CDI3 NES Response: Acknowledgecl, a second hydr�nt exists within approx. 160' of the proposed building and is locateci within the ROW in front of t}ie neighboring development to the east; please see revised Civil Sheet C4.1 for the location of the second hydrant. 3. Note from Engineering Review #3 indicates that this will require a trench box and de-watering because the existing water main is deep. You will be require.d to meet the City Ordinance No. 7918-08 along with the Florida Trench Safety Act Sections 553.60-553.64, Florida State Statutes and the provisions of the Occupational Safety and Health Administration's (OSHA) Excavation safety standards, 29 C.F.R.'s 1926.650 Subparagraph P, or current revisions of these laws and have a separate permit for Trenching for an inspection by the Clearwater L'ire Department �iivision of Fire Prevention Services. i�T�S tcesponse: Aeicnowiedgeci, piease see note �dded io reviseci i:ivii �heet �`4.1 Land Resources 1. Reroute t17e water and sanitary lines to be at least 5' away from the palm trees. NES Resnonse: Please note added to Civil Sheet C4.1 indicating water and sanitary lines shall be located 5' from any Palm trees; please note existing sanitary line is within approx. 1S' of the existing trees. ning Review (Items 1-7 Require For the purposes of verifying the gross floor,�rea of 7,450 reflected in the site plan data table, provide a detailed chart showing the gross floor calculations, per floor and also per use, including revised floor plans showing all dimensions. Once the correct gross floor area has been calculated, additional comments may be necessary. NES and Architect Resnonse: Please see chart provided within the revised narrative as per your request indicating gross f7oor calculations, per floor and per use; the same chart is included within Architectural plan. All information (Site Data �Table, Narrative and Architectural plans) is coordinated. 2. In the subrnittal narrative, and once the square footage's for each tenant space/use has been determined, provide all the square footage's not just the retail space and Starbucics. The IIooter's square footage was not annotated. NES Response: Please see revised narrative which includes a chart providing all square footages. 3. Pursuant to the bullc guidelines of Beach by Design, ��ew development is to el7sure aesthetically pleasing architecture in a tropical vernacular. Provide phol:ographic and written evidence how the proposed developments possesses a tropical vernacular architec;ture. Architect Response: See Photo Collage with Narrative Prepared and Provided by Architect 4. Show on the plans the location oF any ouidoor mechanical equipment such as air conditioning condensers. Pursuant to Community Development Code Section 3-903.II.2., if inechanical equipment is viewable From adjacent rights of way or properties, it must be screened from view. Architect Response: We are now showing on the floorplans general locations for mechanica] equipment and it is screened irom view using wells �ncl parapets . :.t ��.. 5. Pursiian�t to CDC Section 3-912, far devel��pment �that does not involve a subdivision, all ulilities, incluciing indivicival distribution iines, must ue installed underground unless such undergrounding is not prac�ical. As such, add a note to the pl�ns that new Lrtility lines such as electrical and utility shall be installed underground. The electric panels and meters far this development, if proposed to be outside and in view of adjacent rights of way ar properties, will be painted th�- same color as the building. NES Resnonse: Please see note added to Civil Sheet C4.1 "Pursuant to CDC Section 3-912, for development that does not involve a subdivision, all utilities, including individual distribution lines, must be installed underground unless such undergrounding is not practical". Architect Response: The electric p�nels and meters for this development, if proposed to be outside and in view of adjacent rights of way or properties, will be painted the same color as the building, see note added to Sheet PRE-1 - It will be noted on the final construction documents - probably sheet A-2. 6. While a cornprehensive landscape plan application is not being required for this development, provide landscaping for the open areas such as the triangttlar space immediately to the north of the handicapped parlcing space and the open space at the bottom of the stairwell on the east side of the building. Use Florida native plant material and depending on the plant material chose, irrigation may be required. NES Resnonse: Please see revised Civil Sheet C3.1 providing a note indicating Florida Native and Drought Tolerant ground cover and/or plantings shall be located within all open areas. A formal landscape plan will be provided at time of Permit subrnission for review, comment and/or apProval by the City. 7. Provide clarification if the Hooters maintenance hall will be open for access to the public. If not, handicapped individuals parking on the east side of the building will be required to travel throngh the retail store, bacic out onto the public sidewallc to eventually gain access to the elevator. NES Resnonse: The maintenance hall is inte�a�ei�=`�'or employee use only and will serve as a service hall for trash and deliveries. All persons util'�;ng the parl�ing spaces to the rear of the building will be required to use the public sidewalk along t�Ye south to gain access to Mandalay Avenue. � c.�lt:::�:.<..,.• . 8. This condition is being inchtded as a courtesy�:�nd For yoiu- reference from the ]3uilding Depar�inent, As tl�e subject property is located in an AR l�lor�d zone, provide details how the ground floor construction � will be rnediated to ineet I'�AM requireir.�nts. Architect Response: The floor slab is to be of a grfater thicicness (to be determinecl by structural engineering drawings) for bYioy�ncy. The storefront is engineered to meet floocl requirements which will be large missile impact rated, and have sealed calculations for flood resistance as well as Florida Procluct Approval numbers and/or Miami-Dade Notice of Acceptance. The product website is http://www.glassfloodbarriers.com/ - all entry doors will have additional, removable, site stored floodgates. 9. This conciition is being included as a courtesy and for your reference froin the Building Department. Refer to 2007 plumbing code for the appropriate f xture counts per the floor area proposed. Architect itesponse: We are i�ying oui iixtures in accordance witn use and occupancy: Solid W�ste Revlew Solid Waste Condition per Mike Pryor 1. The Durnpster enclosure will need to be redesigned as it will not fiinction as proposed. NES Response: Please see plans for revised dumpster location and sizing as per discussions with Mike Pryor. Stormwater Review The following shall be �ddressed prior to Comm�nat� �evelopment Board: ;,,;�_. Please address City's stormwater redevelopment re�uirements. NES Response: As agreed upon, A�iplication for Payment in of Lieu of Retention will be made prior to issuance of building permit; the City has calculated $21,020.00 as the amount due. The following shall be addressed pr�or to issuance of the Building Permit: l. Submit 4 copies of the approved SWFWMD permit. NES Resnonse: Acicnowledged, 4 copies of the approved SWFWMD permit shall be provided upon receipt. 2. Provide a roof runoff collection system on the plan and show that it collects and routes runoff to a retention pond for attenuation and treatment prior to discharging off site. NES Res�onse: Acicnowledged, pl�ns will be revised to inclnde connection to the City system to c�►pture water from downspouts. 5 Traf�c En�ineering Revlew Prior to review by the Community Development Boarcl: Accessible parking space shall have a vertical clear height of 8'2" per F'lorida Building Code Chapter 11, Section 11-4.6.5. NES Resnonse: Please see note added to revised Civil Sheet C3.1 stating: Accessible parlcing space shall have a vertical clear height of 8'2"; the design (architectural and civil) meets this requirement - there is a clear headspace of 10'-0" now shown on plans and elevations. 2. Demonstrate how a scaled delivery trucic enters and exits the delivery space. NES Response: A new 12' x 35' loacling are� is provided on the adjacent site to the nortli and is commonly owned; the location is intended to serve BOTH sites as the site to the north cYYrrently loads from Mandalay Avenue. The loading area is accessible from the existing curb cut (Ingress/Egress driveway) of the proposed development and will provide a loading are�,,��!f�� off the rights of way in lieu of loading on the Mandalay ROW. We have provided �t ��'ru�ck 'Curning Sheet within this submission which demonstrates the ingress/egress path for a�el� very trucic. We trust this information is sufficient to respond to the DRC comment� and will allow the project to move forward to the Community Development Board. Any additional items ean and will be addressed at time of Building Permit Application. Please feel free to contact Lts if you have questions or require additional information. Sincerely, ��,,., �� . � � r � �� .�--.. � ,.._ o � ` Renee Ru iero Senior P�i� �.r ., .��..._..__,_._.��- gg , ro ect Planner Northside Engineering Services, Inc. . 'vh�� 4. � , � )yp py 2�9�v,�9gg N'�I� ynp /) y � .eE`A�i✓}dY6'f�'4l"bLG�S'4�,/%' � W�S'I.��K�E:��N.�' �1F`.C�'�A1> f .; 387 - 391 MANnALaY AvE, LLC PROPOSED RESTAURANT/RETAIL DEVELOPMENT 385 MANDALAY AVENUE NARRATIVE Description of Request Civil Land Planning Gue Giligence Reports I�G-�f?i11V1�,(_ancJ Use,Annexation St:arrnwat:er Management Utility C�esign Traffic C�nstruccion /�drninist:ration The Applicant 387 — 391 Mandalay Ave, LLC. proposes to redevelop the site with a two story restaurant and retail development. The subject 0.185 acre site is� comprised of three lots and is bounded by Mandalay Avenue to the west, Clearwater Beach/State Road 60 Roundabout to the south, with commercial developments to the north and east. The site is located within the Retail and Restaurant District of Beach by Design. Specifically, the Applicant requests flexil�le'development approval to allow the retail and restaurant development with: a. a Lot Area of b.18 acres (8,074 square feet); b. a Lot Width of 74.95' along Mandalay Avenue and 108.10' along State Road 60 Roundabout; c. a maximum Building Height (above BFE) of 32.47' to the roof deck and 36.84' to the parapet; d. an F.A.R. of 0.987 e. an LS.R. of 0.95 f. a front (West) setback along Mandalay Avenue 3.8' to building , 3.2' over ROW to canopy and zero to pavement and column; g. a front (South) setback along State Road 60 Roundabout of 2.9' to building, 3.2' over ROW to canopy and zero to pavement and column; h. a side (North) interior setback of zero' building, balcony and dumpster enclosure; i. an (East) side setback of 39.6' to the building, 25' to the stairwell, 23.8' to dumpster enclosure and zero to parlcing lot pavement; j. Providing 3 Parking Spaces; k. Flexibility to the minimum standards for the Sight Visibility Triangle at the southwest corner adjacent to Mandalay Ave and State Road 60 Roundabout ROW; as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2- 803.0 of the Development Code. � + . � 300 Sc>ueh Beleht:r Ro<rcl CIC7rw��ter, l=fc�rirJ�� :3:3�7i,.5 tech�nr,�rtl3sirle��r��;inE.�ringse��vice�.cr.am ?27 �}43 2Qb9 I'=ax 7?7 446 8036 Discussion The existing two story building contains approximately 3,800 square feet of retail space on the first floor and six (6) attached dwelling units on the second floor. The site is situated on a highly visible and active intersection of Clearwater Beach and is located within the Retail and Restaurant District of Be�zclz by Design. Bec�ch by Desigh identifies vital retail and restaurant districts as a key element of any successful resort destination and based partly upon the surrounding land use patterns, traffic, and its close proximity to public parking facilities Beach by Design designated this specific area as the Retail and Restaccrant District of Clearwater Beach. Proposed Use The Developer is currently working toward tenant agreements with two highly recognizable and successful national brands to bring a Hooters Restaurant and Starbucks Restaurant to Clearwater Beach. The proposed design contemplates two primary first floor tenant spaces; the majority of the northern portion of the first floor is allocated to a retail tenant (yet to be determined) occupying approximately 1,819 sq. ff. Starbucks is envisioned within the south portion of the first floor of the building, occupying approximately 1,546 sq. ft. The remaining area of the first floor is allocated to the Elevator/Stair Lobby and Rear Service Hallway for the second floor tenant in addition to an 80 sq. ft. Electrical Room. Outdoor seating areas are contemplated within the development project associated with the Starbucks tenant space and shall be accomplished through a separate review as needed and determined, 375 sq. ft. of oLrtdoor seating area (within private property) has been allocated for parking purposes. It is the intent of the Developer to cooperatively work with the City to accomplish an appropriate and acceptable outdoor seating area as the development plans progress through the review and permit process. The specific design of any outdoor seating area(s) will require additional input and discussion and shall be addressed prior to issuance of a building permit. Second floor occupancy is assigned to the proposed Hooters Restaurant (approx. 3,164 sq. ft.); the design also includes a scenic roof top pavilion, providing wonderful outdoor dining opportunities. Please see the attached Tenant Area Schedule which provides specific areas and uses per floor; this information also includes areas for the purpose of calculations associated with FAR and Parking and is included within the Architectural plans for continuity. Through this development proposal, Clearwater Beach will have a rare opportunity to provide customers of two nationally recognized restaurant establishments, locations yards from the sand and the Gulf of Mexico. The development proposal provides vibrant retail and restaurant uses as requested for the District within Beach by Deszgn and will offer a unique and memorable experience for the patrons of the nationally known restaurants. 2 The design offers a two (2) story structure with many architectural features creating an interesting and vibrant focal point for a main entryway to our beach community. The proposed balconies and outdoor seating areas will reflect positively on the beach experience, creating the inviting and welcoming street-level environment desired by Beach by Design. General Applicability Criteria 1. The proposed development of t1�P iand will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and �naracter of adjacent properties in which it is located. The adjacent properties are primarily comprised of one and two story buildings similar in bulk, coverage, density and character of the �roposed development. The proposed two (2) story retail and restaurant development will be in harmony with the scale, bulk and coverage of the surrounding developments as the proposed development provides similar lot coverage and density as the surrounding sites. The proposal offers a building design of appropriate bulk and scale based upon the project area, the character of the surrounding properties and the intent of Beach by Design. 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or signi�cantly impair the value thereof. The proposed improvements will not discourage appropriate development and use of the adjacent land and buildings, the area is already developed and the value of adjacent and surrounding properties will not be compromised. The development proposal will enhance this area of the Beach in a number of ways, including: 1. Providing Clearwater Beach with highly recognized restaurant brands which will serve the needs of the guests of the surrounding overnight accommodations. 2. The proposed tenants �f .ihe,: �evelopment will provide important and necessary support to the be�cn community in off-season months, offering uses that will draw the locals throughout the year, in and out of season. 3. Proposed improvemenx� will significantly increase the value of the land offering benefit to the surrounding land values and tax base. 4. The proposed updated architectural design will significantly enhance the human scale and aesthetic �ppeal of the street-level facade creating a more pedestrian-friendly environment at this highly visible intersection of the beach. 3 5. Offering uses that clearly rneet the vision of the Retail and Restaurant District of Beach by Design ai�� are recognized as vital to the success of a resort destination. 6. Providing a new buildi:lg which meets currer�t Building Code, FEMA regulations and ADA requirements in addition to meeting the intent of Beach by Design and Design Criteria. 7. The incorporation of outdoor seating and balconies to enhance the street level atmosphere; the roof top pavili��n will create additional outdoor dining opportunities for the public, offering outdoor space for all to enjoy our wonderful Florida lifestyle and Beach community. 8. The proposed development will be a contributor to the City's economic base and creating many employment opportunities in fields that have been heavily affected by the economy. 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use. The proposed development will comply, as required, with all applicable codes including the Florida Building Code, the Life Safety Code and the Florida Fire Prevention Code. The proposed uses are appropriate and desired for the area, responsible trash collection and disposal is provided for within the development plan. Hours of operation will be appropriate for the commercially designated area and the surrounding uses. Access to the development will be primarily pedestrian in nature and will not adversely affect persons residing or working in the neighborhood. 4. The proposed developm�nt is designed to minimize traffic congestion. As stated above, pedestrian access is the primary means of access to the development; ample parking i� available within the many public parking facilities with other customers wallcing from nearby hotels. Functionality from a parking perspective will be similar to the Palm Pavilion Beachside Grill & Bar and Frenchy's Rockaway Grill on North Beach; Beach by Design recognized a key element in the success of the Retail and Restaurant District is the reliance on convenient public parking. A formal Parking Study is provided within this submission and contains specific information and data in association with parking for the development. Trafiic impacts as a result of the proposed development will be minimal; it is anticipated that nearby intersections and adjacent roadways will continue to operate at the same levels of service after the proposed improvements are completed. A formal Traffic Study is provided within this submission and contains specific information and data regarding Traffic in association with the proposed development. � 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. The community character is primarily comprised of one and two story developments. The proposed two story development is consistent with the surrounding and nearby uses, and the character of the community; the design offers an appropriately scaled development for the vicinity. The proposed development will meet the needs of the tourist driven community and the desires of Beach by Design by providing uses specifically desired within the District. The architectural design of the proposed development will visually enhance the block and the entrance to our Beach Community. 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts, on adjacent properties. . � The development proposal w�tl improve the visual appeal of the property from the street and pedestrian-levPl; offering a Modern Miami architectural style which is appropriate and aesthetically pleasing for this highly visible Beach location. The proposed trash collection area is located at the rear of the building, is properly screened and will not negatively impact the passerby; a loading area is provided for on the commonly owned site to the north, effectively and responsibly serving both properties. The architectural components of the building provide desired buffering and minimize all activities associated with restaurant operation at street level. COMPREHENSIVE INFILL REDEVELOPMENT - PROJECT CRITERIA 1. The development or redevelopment is otherwise impractical without deviations from use and/or development standards set forth in the zoning district. Redevelopment without deviations is impractical as the deviations are necessary to meet the intent of the Design Criteria contained within Beach by Design, to accommodate the specific needs of nationally recognizable retail and restaurant tenants; and to provide a viable development on a minimally sized parcel of land in the current economy. Deviations associated with parking are necessary as acknowledged by Beach by Design within the District discussion. The proposed deviations are necessary to accommodate the retail and restaurant uses desired by Beach by Design and to maximize the allowable development potential of the land. 5 Setbacks Architectural elements and red?iced setbacks are desired within the Design Guidelines of Beach by Des�g �; �?cvi:ations are necessary to accommodate the reduced setbacks for the builc�:r�g, balconies and columns. The proposed design will enhance the block and �resent a. more pedestrian-friendly environment as desired by I3each by Desi��. Deviations associated with the parking, pavement setback for the drive aisle and the dumpster enclosure is also necessary; the area is sufficiently and effectively designed to provide a few parking spaces, the required trash staging area and access to a shared loading zone. The small surface parking area and proposed setbacks to pavement along the east result in sufficient and appropriate separation/buffering between buildings and is similar to the existing developed conditions. This "back of house" area is necessary for business operation, is out of primary view and will not have a negative impact on neighboring properties or street-level activities. Si�ht Visibility Trian�les A request for flexibility with regard to the sight visibility triangle located at the southwest corner of the site (Mandalay Avenue and State Road 60 Roundabout) is requested. The proposed encroachment projects into the large landscaped area and sidewalk within the Right of Way and in no way creates a hazard to vehicles or pedestrians. 2. The development or redevelopment will be consistent with the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan, as well as with the general purpose, intent and basic planning objectives of this code, and with the intent and purpose of this zoning district. The proposal supports the following Comprehensive Plan Goals/Policies/Objectives but �s not limited to: A.6.6 Objective - Tourism is a substantial element of the City's economic base and as such the City shall continue to support the maintenance and enhancement of this important economic sectc�r. A.6.7 Objective - Redevelopment activities shall be sensitive to the city's waterfront and promote appropriate public access to the city's waterfront resources. Beach by Deszgn, Retail and Restaurant District, prefers retail and restaurant uses within this specific area of the Beach. The availability of convenient public parking was noted as a key element for the strategy and success of the District. C� The proposed uses will promote tourism activities and enjoyment of our natural resources. The proposed redevelopment will provide an allowable and desired use within the "Tourist" zoning district and the "Resort Facilities High" land use category, the proposed uses are consistent with the goals of the Comprehensive plan and Beach by Design. 3. The development or redevelopment will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of surrounding properties. The proposed development is compatible with the neighborhood, as is more particularly discussed in General Applicability Criteria 1 and 2 together with Comprehensive Infill Criteria 4 below, and will not impede other development. The proposed redevelopment project will beneiit the ,community as a whole and specifically this district. The proposed development may encourage additional investment and improvement to the surrounding properties and may draw additional nationally recognized corporations to the Beach. 4. Adjoining properties wil� �►ot suffer substantial detriment as a result of the proposed development. Adjoining properties will not suffer substantial detriment as a result of this proposal. The proposed retail and restaurant use is an allowable and preferred use, as the District name suggests. Retail and restaurant uses are well established within the neighborhood and the district. The proposal includes many improvements such as, providing a new updated structure which meets current building codes, FEMA regulations, fire and ADA requirements; the site improvements include provisions for responsible trash staging and a loading area. 5. The proposed use shall otherwise be permitted by the underlying future land use category, be compatible with adjacent land uses, will not substantially alter the essential use characteristics of the neighborhood; and shall demonstrate compliance with one or more of the following objectives: a. The proposed use is permitted in this zoning district as a minimum standard, flexible standard or flexible development use; b. The proposed use would be a signi�cant economic contributor to the City's economic base by diversifying the local economy or by creating jobs; c. The development proposal accommodates the expansion or redevelopment of an existing economic contributor d. The proposed use provides for the provision of affordable housing e. The proposed use provides far development or redevelopment in an area that is characterized by other similar development and where a land use plan amendment and rezoning would result in spot land use or zoning designation; , f. The proposed use pr�vistes for the development of a new and/or preservation of a��c� �cing waterfront use 7 The "Resort Facility High" land use category and the "Tourist" zoning district both permit retail and restaurant uses; the district allows both uses as minimum standard and flexible standard uses. The proposed nationally recognized businesses will significantly contribute to the local economy, will promote tourism and generate new jobs for the community. 6. Flexibility with regard to u.�e., ��i w�idth, required setbacks, height, and off- street parking are justifie� based on demonstrated compliance with all of the following design objectives: a. The proposed develop�ment will not impede the normal and orderly development and impr�vement of the surr�unding properties for uses permitted in this zoning district; Retail and Restaurant uses are permitted in the "Tourist" (T) zoning district without special approval. As ihe surrounding properties are made up of retail, restaurant and overnight accommodations, the proposed two story development will not impede normal and orderly development and improvements of the surrounding properties as previously discussed within General Applicability Criteria 2. This re-development proposal may stimulate additional redevelopment and improvements in the area. b. The proposed development complies with applicable design guidelines adopted by the City; Through site and architectural design the proposed development complies with the design guidelines within Beach by Design and the Retail and Restaurant District. c. The design, scale, and intensity of the proposed development supports the established or emerging character of an area; The proposed two story retail and restaurant development will continue to support the character of area. The area is primarily comprised of similar uses and developments of similar design, scale and intensity as the proposed development. , Please see additior�al �iscussion under General Applicability Criteria 1. d. In order to form a cohesive, visually interesting and attractive appearance, the prop�sed development i�tcorporates a substantial number of fhe following design elements: • Changes in horizontal building planes • Use of architectural details such as columns, cornices, stringcourses, Pilasters, porticos, balconies, railings, awnings, etc. � Variety of materials and colors • Distinctive fenestration patterns • Building stepbacks; and • Distinctive roof forms E n A variety of the above elements are incorporated into the architectural design as shown on the building elevations. While there are flat roofs and continuous level floors for accessibility, there are cantilevered roof overhangs, awnings, and a variety of congruous but varying elements such as roofs, railings, curtain wall mullings and reveals. Columns and plasters take a very prominent role in the design of several large floor to above roof instances. Columns are also a combination of large masses with proportionately sealed round columns. A portico was not provided but there are sheltered spaces at ground level meeting the intent of the Design Guidelines. There are several balconies both cantilevered and conventional. There are several awnings on the third level. There is a large proportionate roof mass above the elevator and elevator lobby on the third floor. There is a string course type element tying horizontal reveals and horizontal mullings together. The project uses at least two different stucco finishes as well as large glass surfaces and metal railings. Two contrasting, complementary colars are used throughout. On the large column/plasters, a tightly struck horizontal pattern is used. In other areas there are broad axeas of stucco always framed linearly by horizontal and vertical ele�nents. There are step backs on three of four sides and on each floor. There are several �arge vertical forms tying into a proportionately large roof mass as well as several cantilevered roofs. e. The proposed development provides for appropriate buffers, enhances landscape design and appropriate distances between buildings. The proposed setbacks and buffers are appropriate for the Beach environment and meet the intent of Beach by Design; reduced setbacks are provided with outdoor space being reserved for seating and pedestrian flow. Beach by Design The proposed restaurant and retail development is within the allowable 1.0 F.A.R and is an appropriate scale for the surrounding area. The proposed two story structure meets the height allowances permitted by code and provides a use that is preferred within the Retail and Restaurant District of Beach by Design. The architectural design creates the desired change in the building plate, plane and mass as prescribed by Beach by Design. �� The Design Guidelines Section of Beach by Design states "No particular architectural style is prescribed. However, good architecture, from a community character perspective, comes in all shapes and styles. There is, however, in every community an established vocabulary of the "good," the "bad," and the "ugly." New builldings should respect this vocabulary and enhance the community character whenever possible. The more daring the design, the more sensitive the particular architecture is to failure." Five quantifiable aspects of the architectural vocabulary are provided within this Section of Beach by De;sign and we have taken great care to design this project to meet each of the criteria; The design is respectful of the arc�iitectural vocabulary within Beach by Design and the community character; the buildir.g is in scale to its height and length and offers the desired elements of step-backs, and balcor.ies. While the building footprint is considerably less than 5,000 square feet and no single dimensions approach 100', we have tried to use step backs to break up broad planes and keep in scope and spirit of the quantifiable aspects. The building envelope tapers as it rises vertically in proportions we feel accommodate the beach by design criteria. The street level fa�ade encompasses a wrap-around plaza at the southwest corner easily accessible by pedestrian traffic while still maintaining the required setbacks. There are large and inviting expanses of transparent vertical glass with several areas open for landscaping. Materials are stucco and metal with colors taken from the surrounding natural areas in light tan to dark brown. . The proposed development is compatible with the neighborhood, as is more particularly discussed in General Applicability Criteria 1 and 2 together with Comprehensive Infill Criteria 4 above. The existing dimensions of the right of way and curb locations allow appropriate sidewalks along Mandalay Avenue with a connection to the public sidewalk along the south side of the development. The street-level fa�ade offers the desired architectural details and elements. Street level outdoor seating areas are proposed but will be finalized to meet the requirements of Code and/or as approved/agreed to by the City. We are collectively working with the City to determine the specific design and location of outdoor seating areas. The provision of outdoor seating meets the desires and intent of Beach by Design to promote pedestrian activity and tourism on Clearwater Beach. Please see architectural plans and �arovi�ed Photo Collage with Narrative prepared by the Architect for additional illustratif �e e��n�lence of compliance with the Design Guidelines contained within Beach by Design. 387 -391 Mandalay Ave LLC. NES 1102 - 07.14.11 by Renee Ruggierohmr 10 _� - �- � � � � � . a �- TENANT AREA SCHEDULE TYPE OF TENANT TYPE OF SPACE LEVEL FAR PARKING OCCUPANT AREA ELECTRICAL ELECTRICAUPHONE 1ST FLOOR YES YES MECHANICAL 80 SF ROOM MECHANICAL 80 SF STARBUCKS MAIN SPACE iST FLOOR YES YES RESTAURANT 1546 SF HOOTERS LOBBY iST FLOOR YES YES RESTAURANT 228 SF STARBUCKS PATIO 1ST FLOOR NO YES RESTAURANT 375 SF HOOTERS CORRIDOR 1ST FLOOR YES YES RESTAURANT 248 SF RESTAURANT 2396 SF RETAIL ONE MAIN SPACE 1ST FLOOR YES YES RETAIL 1819 SF RETAIL 1819 SF HOOTERS BALCONY 2ND FLOOR NO YES RESTAURANT 1350 SF HOOTERS MAIN SPACE 2ND FLOOR YES YES RESTAURANT 2058 SF HOOTERS -- LOBBY 2ND FLOOR YES YES RESTAURANT 1505e HOOTERS � KITCHEN 2ND FLOOR YES YES RESTAURANT 956 SF RES i AURANT . 4513 SF MECHANICAL ELEV. EQUIP. ROOFTOP LEVEL NO NO MECHANICAL 88 SF MECHANICAL WELL NON-PUBLIC ACCESS ROOFTOP LEVEL NO NO MECHANICAL 868 SF MECHANICAL 956 SF HOOTERS COVERED BAR / ROOFTOP LEVEL NO YES RESTAURANT 979 SF SEATING HOOTERS LOBBY ROOFTOPLEVEL YES YES RESTAURANT 240SF HOOTERS UNISEX TOILET ROOM ROOFTOP LEVEL YES YES RESTAURANT 81 SF HOOTERS DRY STORAGE ROOFTOP LEVEL YES NO RESTAURANT 320 SF HOOTERS BEER COOLER ROOFTOP LEVEL YES NO RESTAURANT 248 SF HOOTERS OPEN SEATING ROOFTOP LEVEL NO YES RESTAURANT 1772 SF RESTAURANT 3640 SF Grand total 13404 SF FAR AREA SCHE�ULE LEVEL AR�A 1ST FLOOR 3920 SF 2ND FLOOR 3163 SF ROOFTOP LEVEL 889 SF Grand total 7973 SF PARKING AREA SCHEDULE LEVEL AREA 1 ST FLOOR 4296 SF 2ND FLOOR 4513 SF ROOFTOP LEVEL 3072 SF Grand total 11880 SF � F- z � � w J Q U � H 0 Z O � JOB NUMBER: 10162 DATE: 05/19/11 DRAWN BY: in JAB3 DATE 12 DESIGN REFINEMENTS 0523.11 13 DESIGN REFINEMENTS 0524.11 14 DESIGN REFINEMENTS 0525.11 15 SITE REFINEMENTS 05.30.11 16 DESIGN APPROVAL 06.01.11 18 RAISED RF. TOP 4 IN. 06.16.11 19 DESIGN REFINEMENTS 06.23.11 20 DESIGN REFINEMENTS 07.01.11 22 DRC COMMENTS 07.14.11 � n � .--� LEGEND � - 4" METAL PIPE � - COLUMN � - GAS METER ❑E - ELECTRIC VAULT ■ - GRATE INLET o - SIGN °C� - FIRE HYDRANT O - MANHOLE � - LIGHT POLE * - SPOT LIGHT � - GAS VALVE o - BOLLARD • - POWER POLE O - SEWER CLEAN OUT O - SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE � - TELEPHONE PEDESTAL � - UNDERGROUND GAS MARKER TS - TRAFFIC SIGNAL VAULT 0 - STREET LIGHT BOX � - WATER METER � - WATER VALVE � - GUY WIRE - - - - OVERHEAD WIRES - G - UNDERGROUND GAS LINE - E - UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC LINE oo°p - PALM s A9 A�- 2F lC l , s fj��. �,lo �. 2 '¢ W � W a U O z J s s �'�.. ��;lc �. I � , � � I � I � � � I �. � � �,.� ., i \ .'� � �. � I� � � i � � � � I ,� : �. . � < � � I �� , i � � � � I i �4.�.': -��, � � � .. .. .. . - ; � BRICK CROSSWALK s s I ts:qJl g��B'l�, � OB F C � � C 9 \ 2 � 9A � � \O 9y LEGAL DESCRIPTION LQTS 23, 24, 25, 26, 27 AND 28, BLOCK A, BARBOUR-MQRROW SUBDIVISION, ACCORDING TO THE MAP OR PLAT THEREOF AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 23, PAGE 45, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA_ FLOOD ZONE THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY APPEARS TQ BE IN ZONE AE (B.F.E.= 12'), IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE FIRM MAP OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, PINELLAS COUNTY, COMMUNITY NUMBER 125096 (MAP NUMBER 12103C-0102-G), MAP REVISED SEPTEMBER 3, 2003. PREPARED FOR JOSEPH J. KOKOLAKIS J. KOKOLAKIS CONTRACTING, INC. 387-391 MANDALAY AVENUE, LLC OLD REPUBLIC NATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY � T�_4.59 FL 432 10'Q ZF q 5 � � �� e � r� � 0 ti � � �ti P �,� � 10'� ❑0 40'R FND N&D LB# 5776 �� 00 N N 3 � � :� � � �� fND N&D LB� 5776 I �� °� _ I�N � _ _ �'�'C�'I011T �, T V�I�� 29 �. 9 I�11TGa i��'�, P�1��'LL� �' CO U1�T �'� FLO�Il�� s / � 2 � \ Z � 0 10 20 30 GRAPHIC SCALE 1 inch = 10 feet BENCH MARK CLEARWATER G-03 ELEV.= 4J495' N_A.V.D. 1 �88 3 3 . � I ^ n-� ` - :� � - __._ _ _ --._._ - -- - --- - ____._ _ � -. .. a :-� 11.9' � o : , , , ; ! , ��; � �� . , --- -- , ' �2 - --- --- --- -- - �- ---- --- �- -- - -- - =--- _ _ , -- _ _ _ _ _ � _ --- - - --- --- ---- --- ----- - -- - --- � , , � : • TiNO . ' --_ _ __ -- - �. -- .. _ -- -- -- -_ , , 9•O �. __ . _ , _ _ , , --- - -- ----CCTNIM ER�1A a-BtD� B # : �� _ � ` -et�c -- __ _ . _ ___ �t�c: ._- ° FND N&D TIE - �-- � -- `— '-- '_-- �-- � - ---- ---E�1S� '�--- -- — ---- -- --- . _ ,__.._ _ __ � _ --- - --- '__... --- __ ; -108 2'R ' 0 4� ". , o os's. LB# 5776 3.23' , 6.24'W. ; ; x4 --- �- -- , � S89°54 55°E FCM 4" 108 27'M i s : COV. � � .- -- - -- ---- - -- - 30 --- - s — ` ;. o.os'N. i., ; �DG. ! sss Xss ,,,1 5� c �.:: , t, �. �,.� � �� t_ __ ; ; j � � BCDG. 9 FoP r ss 2.56'W. 1. _ . � _- - - `- `--- =-- �--_ __ - --_ � __ �_ . . _ o __ . 1 � 0,`0'I'S ` , - - - - ---- - _ -- � - �-- ---D.O�'S '-- .,h�` � ; o.a�'s. i , � o.a2'e. ` ' ` � , . - -- - - ' _. ^. — -- --- -- - --- - ,. , — - -- -- -- �- �- - � - -- - - - __ --- , � o: , � �. , - i � � �--- ' --- __ __ _ _ . � � .>� � ; . i ; , �_. _ � � � �--- - --- — ---- �- --- � --- --- � �- --- - _ , � , _ -- � - - _ �_- - -- � , � , � � a: } � I ' °.. ___ _ t. __'._ _ ` � N __ - : _. -- - � `__ �-- ,, . . _ i 23 : � , : , _ �_ _ _ - _ -__ _ _ _____ . __ _ �. � , �� , . - - -- - - — = o� , - - -_-- - - = - -- � - � _ � - --- • F - - - -- - - - -- - - - �„ � �� :_ - � � �. ;:� � � � � _. , . � , ___ -- ' -__ _ . `. . � � � - ___ _ _ _. _ __ _ _ _ -- __ . - -.._. , _ :. _ - --- _-- + ' ; i ; ; � � O � ' � , � -- �--- - - -- _ - -- -- _ ' , � , $ -- _._ _- ---- __ _ _ .__- - - -- -_ � _- --- - - -- --- _-- � ; ; , _�'�'.�,', � ° � .� � .. � � � �AST 1p8.2'R i '��n rn J � � to.O '� � - .. - - , - . - _. s, . X ; r� ^ , ; . ,, ! ; ��t' i � - • -___ - — __- -- �__ -- - -- �— --- ? '�.£� . --- � ____ _ . _._ - . � ` � � j i , pI (�(��/ > > > > - - -- _ �_ ___ -- Xs� � ' ' _ -- - � � �__ �.75 - - •--- - . v , ' -- - -- -- . __ ; n ' - __ __ �_--- _ _ . � ; ., �. _ --_ __ -U7 L lJ L..l�\�- F� ,�v � 1� - - i 4 r. - f � , � _ L.._._ _ ____ �. � - _ �-_ --. __ _ I__-- - '-- �---- - --- - - ---- - - ---- '- - -_ --- - � ::. � w , : , ' , , ,<, ; � ;- _ _ � - - •--- - -- '- �__ ONE'STO�Y C.B S. ` a (CONCRETE) _ __ � _ ._. - --- - - _ _._ --- -_ _- -- - rs � �l, � � ;: o , ; __ iCOMMERCIi4L BLDG. .__ - - - __ _ _ _ _ � � ;� , , ; � 3£� � � �-- ��- , � ; . h. ,.._.- -- -- - -- -- - �-- - � ' � � �' 4 ' ; ; ! � � ' f .o . " ; : -- - — ' •- ... _. _ .. _--- - --- — .__ _ _... --- �� -� 39� � , �_ � � t .� � ' LpWEST FLOOR EfiVA710N 564 ___ __.. - - - �--._. _._ - --__. , :_- --___. � : - - �_ __ __ __ -- -_ _ �;` � W I :� �� c�i f < 3 DO' � �� -- �� __ 1_. , � , � o � ' � _ __ _ __ _ __ __ ___ ' ' - - �_ _.._ __ _ _ _._. __ --- L.___. _..__. � � � � � . ., • � � � - � . . F � � .. : ', . . . , , , , , . ; , � . . - ....__. ` . _-- `.-_- . . . , W ` p 3p `--- - ---_ . --. . _ _.-- _ .__ _ - ---- _ `--- _ - - -- i _ , � _ � ` ; :"�"'r.��- -�' � i � �AST ��, , i cfl , r„� �; .. _. ' , . _. . . . „�. o � �p82'R� _. _. � �� . � Z � . � . 3 45 ` �-- - � -- _ ._- '--__ �,- —_ ...- �-. _ _ _ � �--- __ �-_-- - - -- - -- - --- _ _-- i � '�°�,'f' t �' K'� ` � , . XSSb � � ,�! . I -_. ' �.. ' „o�� i � '�. � '�. . � - ; � � . � i �r.� �x�% . � QI � ___ _ '`____ ' - --- ___ ,_-- ----_ ---- -- _'_ - _ __ `_ ---- -- --- -- _ _ c0 10�0 � � „' . � j ¢ V�j c0 � . y. I �3'1,; �,� "_3.45 :___._ . � __. __ _ '-.. _._ -. _.._ _ _ __ _ __ � cn `\ o i h � : , � � 'r_020 ; ' _ . _ _. . - _ _ _. ,.__ G ___ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ i _ __ �_ _ . -.__. ' � �J � i � , oo ; � � a:so• � - ! _- '-- � - - - '- -. '�__ _ . _.. -_ - - - -_- ---- - ____ _ __ '__ ---- --- � � ___. ' " " � ss� � ; , i>., �, _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _._ __ _ � _ �_ __ . _ _ _ _._. � �a�o ___ ._ i ; , ! ' ___ _ - - --- - - � .� N . � c�v. � : , ..,;- . r.eo` �LD� -_ . _ __ _ _ - - _ ___- - __-- __ - --- --_ __ -- - - � ; S '� n n . ' 2.57'W. 1; , '�n �.26 N. ! ; --- _ _ _-- � - 0.60' UPRIGHT CU B �._ o.,z�N. c ,. � �. .�--- ----_ _ --- --- �_ _ .._--- - �--- �--_ - - - _ _-- -- � �-- - ---- � - - - --- : B�oc. - - - � _ -��'� ! ,�,.3-� �:'��1 ss2' ;� : 6.13'N. ---- s - - _� Sys. �--- �--- , , �'-� •-5_ ' ` ! ! ` '� � ' � 73�s `: ' i h^� ' y� �ss Ss2:Fr� FIR 1/2 ____._ ,o , i ;. � � : x � FND N&D o, e' � ,�, . ` X , r ____ _. � h�' ,,. � WEST n s2s � ,.�� 1082'R `�� '� �'�� - � Jfl LB# 6423 ; � X ', r�; = h N89 58 34 W � 108.44'M �. /...!" f� ,�� ___ __- 12.2' i x�`�°' ..' � � L NDNG corac�t� sraRS � � � '.. �. ��-�'`y , ��• . : T�� WITH METAL FRAME �CONCRETE� � � '`� - - �- `- y�. - � 2"d,3' � �� w i � � X � � � w �, , . � �, L - �oo -- - --- �- s? z " � , : � 26 9 _"� _ ----- � J '� . � . � � : t y� . i � , � � s� � ; � 10 QO � � ,F .7, `-._- - �— !. -- L '- �-- 68.bD--- ' -- - ' � ' = � „ v �' ` � W � �- �_.__ �-. �.._-_ -__ � . � U W m U W m O 9' ,• � � f . ',. � I ; ; , � , ,�_ : .; ; , � . li � _ _. . ____ C� 1 ' ' m . . `-- - '`- - �--- L_. . �-- - '-- `--- � �-- - '- -- - ---. -_ L__ ._-- -- '--- xs, ,.'� �/ - -- h ;� 1 � �, ; i ! ' , � ��y , , ' � --_.._. _ ._ _ �._ -- -- � . , 7 �._ ,,. ; m ; ,N i �_ __ _- _ _- - - � - -- - . _ -_- - _ __ � -- -S- -- O - ' f ' '. � ��.�� `�-+ � � 1� , , , ; � � � � _ _--- --- - ---- _._ --- - . . __._ . -- - - -_ _. - -- ----. � " � _..__.. - ---- , , _ � - , ,� __. ; � , , , ; , I �. '` ! ; � " ' CfiEiE� a��AtS ; °- I I ; � i � ! i s,�j � .,, __ _ _ __ _-'- _..__ __ - __ _ �_._ _ . �_.__ __ !_ _..___ . '-- - __._. IYIxHilEiltL'fdtAYf � _. � s � -� i ''6' ' --- � ' ; 2,R , � 1`` �', - . - `--_.. � . � ' i ' I � � � � 'i , �,. _"___"__ `_ '_'_"-_ _ �_'_'_ � " . . . , , �.___. `___. L._ `_ -__ . _-_ _ . . _- ___ _.-. ___ �� __ __ - i � '� . .. .. �� . � � � � I � • I '` ' . . �.' ^ ' � i ,� ' 1 :' �' I . i � �� ' . � � . 1 I ' _. �� . . I � I ` . ... .._...._. i....._. I �. .. ' . 1.._ .__ ...__.__ .. �.. _ .__�__. L W ^ ��:, W" .�. _._.._. . .. _ . .__- .__ __ . .. ,_...._ � C� I ___ -. ____ � . � . , , ,, , , . �z , ,__.. .. j � � i 1 � . I Qo �`� .'� � J` � ,. � r� � ;_ 1 , � - i ' - i a r- ; � � � -. _._._ ._ ,_ . �__.. l___ - `___ �.-_' -_. �"- '__ `_ _._ �-._ '- _-... _.__ L. '__ _ �.- �Q � ! ; � � j � , �' - �'�•�fl S�j� ;-- - ; , , � � , � __. _ . . _ _ W i . , ' : �__._- ,___ __._--- �--- _ i_ __.. _ _____ _ L_.__ _ s __ � � , :' • -' ' ; ' -_ ___ _ TWO STORY C B:S__ . , � ..' `.� „ �- -- - - _._. ._ �-- �" �'�.` �; ; ! ; ; iCOMMERCIi4L BLDG. {� 38� , ------ --� � --- _- �- - �. , ,r-, , � �-- -- .__. F �_, _ ! ' _ i- '--- ' - ' _�'"� ��/�JlJJ > > t f , i�. - - -_ _ --iON'ESi-FL09R fLEVA�ION='S�4' --- -- __ i t^�. --- J� � ,. - --- �. �-j � JI �.( [] � , � � , _ '� ; I ,� ' ` D F EL ON 7 � SECON LOOR EVi4Tl �6.9 �A�P��i.T� ; . I � , I ; , � ,,. , { � , � ,O ._. ._ __--.__. ____ :... _. i.._._.._ i .. __ i_. .. , , . �'--_ ._.._._ ..._..._.. . ... . _ _.._ . .._ .. � - . . U�yV �ll\ �/ 1 . � . ' - ; , -- =�--' _ � ____ - .._ ___ ' w _ __._.. o0 i , ,� f �jj �, � i ' '� � i i � Z r;.� �t �. � .._ ._ �_._.._ i._.._. '� _ �__.___ . ,__ _. '`_..- '--..- ` �' c� - N � � �� .. ; ; , � I , _ . ,. _ _ �.__. �_ __. _ .__ _ `___ �.___ � j¢ z� � _ _ . - 2o f I ' ' ! ' �' Z ' i �' , , � � � � � � ; ; � I�, - -- -- `--- ___ � - � � --- --_.- '- -- = `--- � � ---. _ ..__._.. . -- •--- --- _ ' ' ;:; �� : - _. _, . __ (� W'-oW 1 h L --_ -__ '___ '_ -- -- - - -'-- ��$.Z�R �499 �J ' , '� L ��--- ��_-_ i i I,�. ..._ � �. '.__ - - ' -- - -- � � , I 5 s�0 p N t - - - -- �-- - `-- .-- i- �_ _ �-- ` _ --- �-- --- --- - . i.-- - � � , Z � f '' , � , ' Z3 `' 1 z � ' { � I � . i ' � ; � �' �' 6� � . _ �.. . __._._. .. .'-- . __.-- - ._.. ,_--- . . :_._ ._ _ _ _..-- -. _ . �._.__ . _.- '.---- � .� ._..-.. ._. _ tC / �^�l � � � , ,; , , , : �. . � � � � F� �S� , � , � i �� i � . i , , , ' i i� , ' . � � !, i i 1 ' i � ' ' ; I . t � i . ; ! : f.� j � -. � : � � '� �; . j , .� �.. _ , .:. tr� . ' . . . , . " " __'_.... . _.... ,._._ . ' .. ' . '� . ' ' . ! �_ __.. .._ . .._ ........ . ..... ._._ ._.......... ... i..... ...__..._. .. � _"'._...." ___.. ._..... .._._.._ ' . �. — - `___'- ___ _ _ `___" � �;. , : . �, � _ . - _ . ; , � � i ' � i �� r�-� _ ' � �. I \ r i, � I � . . � �' ��' � : "r-� ' ' - , � . ... � L.__._. L ' � � . - � __ _ ._.__.. � __ .__.. .__ �_._ __ L N __ .__ - -_ _ __ .._ _ � ... ----�{ - -___ - `- __ _ `_ s ',, ` I ' / � I �� ,�' � , ; i i , , I '; , ; .p� � � _ , - -_. --- - .-- _ `__. -- - �---- - ' _ _ ' -- ----- _ �_, ----. . ..-- --- �. 4 �,; . � j i i 1 �-- --��-- - .. - �� o .: '' . . '� � . ' �` ,,� 41,��; . ;:,� !--- �-- L.- '-- ' _ - - �--- _-- -- •--__ . __ � _ �___ ___ _ _- - �---- � ` 2e ,5 ,_i„� --- � c5� 9 �, .� �,s .,,: � '�,,�.:�' �� r . 1- . : Ks.zs' ; �' �.� pti ':l L�V �: h ti . , ; , � � . , r - � - 1-�- - _. L_ . i— '- : A0 a.._ v- i _ ; •. � `- --- `-- 1.31•. � � � � L� _��.JI . - . . . . . � L � 01 32 / �oo soy ya1 � _ _ -- _ � w� 118 46 M �"' N4EST 118 26'R `r� � N �iE �� 7� ,��' ' �`" ��7'�0"W X FND N&D EAST �,� c� �.' "��$.�j� cn --p �. ��T � LB� 5776 S89'52�52��E R� ��'S ' �� FIR 1/2° PLAT PRM BIKE RACK x °`�� `�� LB# 6168 4 ��h ,�� ` � �� ,�� „ � � � � BLK. COR. B4 yX EOP ,,6�� .� _ - . � A9� � . �`� 6'SX k� ' �� .f.� . - « ; 8'0 °` �r ��R : , i2'p . : �. : ' ,.. . �+t��TC. �ui c7. . ` ' 'I . . . :' :. `! . ` 3 R1 O A s'� e,?�' �y° � h h� 9'p STORM SEWER MANHOLE N. RIM EL.= 4.77' �so. ,�� F( 9•�Xr '29 a ,`° A1� � * �s•o � 10'� 9"� ` �,0 $.� �,. 11'QX x 4 �lC ❑ 4B� 4,� �A s'p �� 4 ' �O AB ? ,p 5 �� r� �rs � 46, � � ' * _ r�°' 14'Q � 1;X 4' OUAU 0 � O❑ O a� ��RB BRICK CROSSWALK � � j c� h o• LANDSCAPED MEDIAN a�'�� p" BOUNDARY SURVEY , : ��0 p1 1• � A� i � 1 " ___'.'_'--. � LANOSGAPENOTE: LEGEND —��x. ��;, RaRlo� IUTIVE UNDSCAPIMG WILL BE YROVIOEO ♦NO PER SELTON l-�201C 0/ iNE LOWIINT' �� OEVELDPYENf LO�E. AM AUTOWTIC PERWMEM HFy �p�y�T i � !} ��r�.�,; IRNIUTON MTEY WILL Bf PFWIGED. YPERVIOS SURfACE N�11D SHALL NDT BE NEN CONCXEfE � IXLEEOE�. 0.�5 PEWIOUS SIIq�ALE RAT10 SX�Il BE NEW 9lDG. � �: iNOVIpED ON SRE. �!Sfis �` r'//i FX B.MIC PAVfRS NEIY 01I1&SIFA FNtLO3LLK ��. 1� '`$ .�� r rwu roxc. a.o g �/ n,� m iura er� .um I� [ urr ro�rcr rnr w nvr. sres � ��! � U)Y SR'tfAy �� ^F ur<2i �:`\.'.! ` � '=x �. = " .._°-.-r. ;, H �!� -'--_ �3.i1 � ` �.. '; j / .. ...,.� . ,>m : . . . ,E,= ---�a�zm �' :J„ i 'd � ; ,_-��!, Of'UVERI(5 b l': . i '. m.� � '.�� . , . -'. w �- . t:: � ��_� �_ __ ' �_�v .�' i .� W ''t ;�:. _ _ _ . � �-, � " --_'_c___--_'__ � �''� '� aa'/ �w� m.� f.r'"r,..�'�� ' : ,..�.� �:� ra" ' � / '�. (�'��W � � � � _ � -� ,,. ;�..�.�,�� °'� �'— '_"J � lt i „""`^. � / � � � � .. �� _ � � rrcw i:• r ss• wauG mxc , q�g1�3 '_ a. q �� iu""" 3 I� i � �..,,� , �x"�°„"` ` �� ,�,. �,. , . �—� � � � L.� � 3 f j— � � --, _,�}.,.,,,,,� � _ �. '. ' � ��- .'p a.i. � m[� I `�� ti $ t _.\\ \ -��,.,'- ��c� V rv=`r:- i� rurniexw �. \t� \\ � I I �,�. ..� , , �V�, J � r� € �\ `; `�� : . . _ , , ,, , .- , g= '� �:�' � • , � .` ,> ',:, - � � �. ,�. � , � � � . � �r, ' � � cc � � ic, s.�cx -. . ,�yc o� mw �. ` � _�'�' 'i i x� > -' ^ �� nitns[°'°� teaxv ��\ �xn � � ... ' t �, � F.�� . ' �-yyyE _ � , q � nx. ovn�w.vc � ^„ A 4 ] o•hac IHt2.6TORYBIDG i g j! ' � ., SRliq'-�a� ��r� _ _ _ I+ �h fi �.i � �.�s� - 4! �l ta � i _ '� � w.roFm �� ° - ' - �'�-na. oiwww _ _ " ivm �. � i p E � ! �cusm � s�msr � ' evym y.v � 3 '_ � i ( � � . . . _ . �� i i � a �K � ` .. . � 3 . i :� Lll�f. � b��' I i cG I 11 1J .Y,} - _ - MYN� SNiII g� -- �a ( rA 7 � � '�< �-,a . _ "sre°i^'r"u"cc ;�g�c°fur'oNO.rr i '^��: � ;� ' � h my`_ i �' XX' � '�'\-M�°y�. �_� -,Y� ��,c,�,� � �� xnrsrr /-' . . �` � , F _ � , ��RACif � l'� l f g ' _ �, f: � .�. l _ � - - �- I _, .,-"+• 7;� �� ! :/ ,. ' "`� , _ . __.. - / � � � '�s � ue ar n.w z r fi.vo R.e sro u� � , � _ �� - s / ,.; � -... ,s�.,.,,,y ; / . s" a'°.1 °�rwuMC `t'a cur a ��a.m n. '!�iaz°= � .. `� ura ar zro '^ // r. ec �- �— _ -�_-_-____ x a .:- . 1 _ 14� 9uevnw�r � •. L -� ' arrmu.w. ' /,/� �_,_,_� `-,-_... .� .vW � L - � 1 � �� w �\ � �// �y aq""--,._ '_- �1.1ro /AS - �- i°�-. ;a ,: � + v> n _ _ _�=-`__ �--u- � �� `_- — —` = _ I . _ r: , - x � -. .- '„� i l `�,�, ` � -� i �;+e��.__; __�:3� _ �`. �.-'%'..;;� , _ _ '-�r.-- -- ..... : � , ---- � ; i i 1 � "` - ' jl n -w.cr, ! j i 1, „�, '�... _ -__,_. �-��.� --'----.__ „--�--.-..___ : r,,r„ '_,-,_. _..--,:._._:_..�.__--._.._,,,_. -�"��; i! _ ,,, _ _ � _, � �= .. ,.- .;� .�` � _ � �-:i; i r �'_ _�� ;,==_ , `!: � � � e �. s'.. ♦ � �.;� �." .. . � � � �i . ..aNx) ,n , �-_—.__. �_" �_..�.._ -:��_ .� µ :: ,� �fi G \�cF •.r r�� (bip� N iF xtw '.� tlGRi: 1. 1CC651B1E P�RKING SP�CE SH�LL IU�VE A VERTIGL LLGF HEICM Of s' - 2' PER FLORIW BUILDING COOE CIUPTER 11. SECTION 11-48.5 2 � Q Z SCALE: 1 "=10' � io o s io zo � U d � J a a M9 r � a °0 � Q aLL � � �W � a � �a �{ � � z � � W �Il � � ca � m -� NO�S�d6 V� �o � � `:; . . -.. � � _ ____._.__ LY CW:G ro aauµ 35.00 a.00 zs.00 $U-3$ teet Width : 8.00 7roek : 8.00 B�.K p�� Lock to Lock 7ime : 6.00 �, �� s_ �,�, Steering Angle : 30.00 pyK., �0 M/e' mcx M�us ro wrcrr ,vcw nac �xo wrc m �rrtr arr a nnr. uas .,.�_._. msus�r. ^-a"iC... . �::ra.�., ��1,•�� x ss• r,wwas e casorcHr LEGEND NFNASTLLT ,. x.,.i�d'.,y°:S�'.�� MEW COMLREfE � MEW BLUG � � � �,'�„ �� w�+n I �` ' � I i _ `� � '� /i � � � 3.t� '�v )YIF � `�$ Y __ ��`..�� v" "y�Y �p Y �i rLLVC 6�311U ' t. `� `'.�, � �= i , r,� .»„� `,A � �� : � � , , , � � i,� �� , g� �� ; . . ,� o �.�-� _j � ` a� x sww � m-a" Lw ,�.�� ucwn � i � t,n-.r �� ai' smvl_ 'I �ti+HC ��m . �1 ; � nx. r�-,xwxc ., � .. .. � � . � � . . � srrn'�i �ar r , IRiY] bSORYBIDQ � e e� � . : a F � • x-. _ - FtaSa _ ` � BA e !� t �.r '' - (UR�RffiAB� �� z �. e, . � - � �uwc �:xa 3rf t\ . na. ovicecwc � �\ ' _ . � ;� � i 8 � e � ��i nom �• ; ; . . , m�na ' . _ � i .r i' I 1 ° _ �. nvo� . �Aar ' , � ' 9 � � � � . ... ��. ,; .. ' � - �. � � 3 � � , ; ; � . . _ �y� ; � -:.. � :', 1 ! r � _ , _ ep � , � % Nn � 1l � � "T` N .. � .. , ,( s � � � i � ,..➢MCG Iwl 3 � �li 1. �.'<Y,-�1 �io��.r�,;.� i � 'f ' ..�,.r„'°°e-� . rsxaucwr' '��.. . . � J � =��' � : xtw ewr /"`" �� ' _ , �.,, �.' _ - I �, nmo i �xAa' i /�� ` - : , 1__ .� " �'fnat'� �,,,,, ' �• 1 ,� / � � .� ��.: u,r o� sliwJ � ranv .- _ " i � "f� '"` ^�.G � � _ (PMnM—Jx0 �M/c[K�p� L____ � " p '� ••id % = y y.s ax.l °7�nw.vc �aa -L' � - `� uxr ar vro : � • u..wn � „!` � �rr cr zxn �"---� ' � --�.y�..rtw. orcieuxe.'�.r"�� ,L,,,� a: - 2e a+(cwr �r.r cr —sL, fW0 r�f� .,u s ___ �� .I_ �F \. `� _s '/ �? ��i� Tt J �� ` �'. ,� ,� , e: -.� I � +. ' ��l ., � - a+w 11 11 a v� _- en an - --_.,.— - — — ,. �_ .m., 'I j; I �I - z-_ � , ' -____. 1 ' �AANDALAY AIENUE ` "� �� MAND w .�....... _ . AIAY BOULEVARD - PLAT) u.,,, �� - -- __---�.__ �! �r� �,a"` w.o 'r` --�' �___ _ �� . 1. ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACE SfULL HAVE A VERf1UL LIE�R NEIGHT OG !' — 2' PER ROMIO� BUIIDIMG COOE CXAPTER 11, SECiION I1-1.63 NOTE: 1. CURBS SHALL BE MODIFIED TO MITIGATE FOR � TRUCK � ACCESSIBILITY. CLEARWATER BEACH/ SiATE ROA� 60 ROUNDABOUT (MARIANNE STREET-PLAT) Pn �om vu�l 2 � O Z SCALE: 1"=70' 1 za Z a J a � � H U � � �~ i U J J a 'a J � Q e- O = a� Q � �d aw rn cQ �3 fa � � NO�S�pe 0000 u I� o- � g � ,,, s 4 � N OWNER/CONTACT OWNER /NFORMAT/ON: 387-391 MANDALAYAVENUE, LLC JOSEPH J. KOKOLAKIS 202 EAST CENTER ST TARPON SPRINGS , FL 34689 DESIGN PROFESS/ONALS ClVIL ENGINEER/PL4NNER: NORTHSIDE ENGINEER/NG SERVICES 300 SOUTH BELCHER ROAD CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33765 727-443-2869 SURVEYOR; ARCH/TfCT,• GEORGEA. SH/MP ll J. W. SMITH DESIGN GROUP, L.L.C. AND ASSOCIATES INC. ARCH/TECTURE & PLANN/NG 3309 DeSOTO BOULEVARD, SUITE D 748 BROADWAY SUITE 202 PALM HARBOR, FLOR/DA 34683 DUNEDIN, FL 34698 727-784-5496 727-785-4441 FLOOD ZONE /NfORMAT/ON COMMUN/TY PANEL No.: FLODD ZONE.� REVISED MAP DATE.• MAP No.: �25096 AE (B.F.E.= 12') SEPTEMBER 3, 2003 12�03C-0102-G � ETIN � T WN HlP RAN E 5 E � � PA R OS-29- �5-02592-00 �-0260 - 385 Mandala A ve De ve% ment Site EL / . D. y � a � PA R EL /. D. OS-29- �5-02592-00 �-0230 - 387 Mandala A ve L oadin Zone L ocation y �► � � ci ry oF CLEARINATER � �-�� ::* h� �r �� ,� �� .��.+ � ... .. _ � ,._., .� ,_� �. TP _ ��` '� �- � �"`,.� � '+� ;"� -�:`�' . - n _ - � � � � � .�� ' � �'��' � � r ' ; �F ` :�r � � � _ �� 4� . . ; _1 , , � '� � ��,�i'!� . ,� a �t �� s� ,;�, a, . i � "z �,; x. 'i� � �s:' . � v . . �,ty " � . . f'.1!! ,' � � � `tl -. . . .,,� _. w �. - °� 1'� ", �- � ,�` �.� � . - ` � � -> -y a��_ � „t 's ; .i- xk--�t . . a ' �3.^�+t_�' �� fi '�� 'v.'r � � �� - � . . x � � i� _ � - � '� . - ' .. .� . �. �. - .-_.. ' � _ -�ir� �e. � _n�� s�`iP�; . . �..��*. J�,. I 1 I,'.:"'�` - _ t�j� � �' - c:� '� �Ya ,fr s� � -. "�' ,_z _' . ��, .. _ !,� - ..Y� �' ;� . .�� :s�� _ s,. . ..� { ., . ,+' '�a'-' - � �3�-�. � : '§� :. � s�a�� -;-�� ,.� _ u,� Y t � _ ^ � - d -.fw' �, _ .. v. �� -� r : ' '�- --�� : i_r�� _.. '�.� '.r6 �3�, � r . . � Fklr� '� .,�� s�. .� _ � ., �'` cM'��^:; :t�M��_ !i�, _� ta.,j�a.e a��'iAJ ~ ;±'.!� � i ��V �:�' s.�._s r 4�� n:� fa I� . ' 4-ak _ •_ c � . ��. �� e ��.,:: .__ ! � � x` itl lp.l � r.�i �:�� .�t: ` '� �� : �� _ 1�.. �. ;F. . .� �� . � �� .,. -: r �F .j . �� _..a i* � �`Y :. . t ., � _ Y3., %,� i'.� '��- . _ � . :� t ,'� ._ � �� . . � � � � .� ;� _' ": .. -s ': . . .... � . , ._ � C �: _ [� is,q i - la• - � as �n�, r �_, ; � � . # Mr;�;��. �. � 4:" a=�' r? �` : � :� i�� .. � �, x r: . '- �� ,�, � ,, (j - . �Y�i !j — �� dsV,3sUl1 -.. � ��nlM �� , �� . .#b. .�.9r� �iMt.}: �.-�rg — j �� S � ` wi� . . � ai• � � ,�i� ,5 - ,� � � „s,.�, i, . �� + . ,. . -.*t ,- �� . z'�-� :�.�.: .,:F�_ � ,.'�A ��7�=+-•- �-�� 4,r : ,�� t:j -�i� - � �� ,.. � �' _ �` -- __'�r-*'u - - .�'o .F +i, r ' �=„ , ,�,� �'a i u, � � �.�,, ,� r:. - . "yt �.-4' _ �e_, - � - - .,1it (JI:rJF �ni .r. �� (� -- 1 �=�: =s � � >,.�-,'�. .�' �i _ �.,�?�. '.. . � a - ' . ,_ s �'. � -- �� ' z�-e �'>: .� ° a.? � ,�iili ;a S ! i .. .�a . _se, .. �. _ �� - .. � �, � v �`- . � <. s _: � ...x s"j', sd_�e. .__� 'uji.Rs :.?{[il �/: � F - � "'.y�T�� AE�$- ' a � - " • �. i r-. .. . �- . .. , �' _ � �, a ,. �'r � . � ��. ,. �j � iC F; - : !�l �er �� i (' : _ a ,�� k ��.� , � ,. .. . p.�,.; _. --.. • .. r t. , }-` .r 4 �' �, r� r � � ,3 � laY. 2 + s '� �r�:;.� �r�*�"� � #i�y� #'di � e'�` ' '�:- +�. . ;,,R;�t,,, _ - i �' � n� .� - °�. �-..t1 �'�_ r - � !1` . E� ' � �! i . R' +�`F,: � . Y� - "r :�.+t� �r� .� �r;._ [. � g - =a �.- " �:-:�� f• a. -��4 �k �'�� T�,,a:�.; �' - s $ �:,�a .�;.y". � ;?. `�:�:- l�, . .�.. . �� - i g. - . � - ' p �:.r_ ,� .�.�.3 � . _ . _ . f -:�:K � :�±�t � �`� . - . �- .. .. . . _ , � F �� _ � � r � �:; - 4 _ " � `� -'_"`. - 1� i a� :: . . � . � , . ; . . � ; : . .. . _'' t ,(_ , -. ., . ., s ' . . : � ., •� .` F e:, -�l� �:`� ` �r.,': • -:- . . , �y �� ° _ s.� y' �• �^ .�" r� �.,_' ,. " .3it �: �' �,`� _ . . lAll i .' I .�f , � � � a�� 1 P i,� � .+, �r � �� .� � ; .. ,�y,��. � ,-� :• a� � s, � - � �� ,�� . � , . �, � � � 3 P - '� � i �� ,.�`v��. � � �'-� # r is �Q+. a� �� ,�� -� '� � F _ � � x. ._ � _ � �' ��, �` „ � _ � � " .� � �,: `�, ;r.�-.�° � � -�� - � , � { � �� .� , ��' � � � � .� ,� , 1 f � a �� -: � � _ _ �� ; ; � , � ,. �. . � � a� � d . . F ° u j 5 � Y , ,;� , x a y � � .. �S-+.1 : g`c�` _ .�'-. _ - �c:. ° - 5 �j �,� `�. �t'a„�'s'�.. i 1 s�.i�:a +t ,'__, ��' � ,�`.� � .. ,r`_.� ' � , - .t` : � ._ � �.; -�:. � .. i. t . J• �� € " .�w i , . �. , � . . -, ,{ �. � �.. ..� --, �,-�E: - .. .- -_ �y i'B ��1�y ,� � F.��.2 ' y��'` 3E� i , �� ," ' - ' A „ �s �, i � •. � , - � . . � y M �x" •.� ,� � r. . , . . .s�,.::`�" ' � ?e R � `�i � h�. �• �� ':� � � �y�� * �' �t , .. , . � �. b x � . �� » �► '� .� � �_ _ :_ . , , T� � � _ � i - ,��. ,� t, r= � � � �. � #� � �; �v.. a� � � � � � . � , �� -, . . . � { ,r r , � �, :� : . .: . r - . .:_.,._ , .. �=` � , 4 ., - ,� n , �'� � . t� . � :�, s i �, � � _ Y = ,�:"4` _ " ,�fi. �"` +` � -+vw�...�.i �m+�- . i, . , _ _ . , _. � �, - � .r' � .-`-�, '-� �'• ^ ,',�.�:ti�,,.t'%t �I i"- e� � �",� :': , a � e . � +� ;i, � l J.�- 1,3} F `�r ua ^�-�€ �x,�r(�T" ..,�..,..�..,., x�-'< ` '.�� ► - � � � � �,.. _.. �,-.!� ,.�:�.�n�:�.-.�- ' • — • �, �` . _ _ .-.-�.,�--,..,E�.- _...�.,�..°-*��-""'°-.�.';,.�� . � :� _ �. : �, �" - ► # �n. y � -� - - 9 ��' � �' :'�`� : ' ✓ ~ � �a-ev.n,.�.vssmx -=-"+wW�Jere•��.^r`-_-ivr Y • eM"" . . . , ._.. �z �� ; ` � � � .. �� % , � ';-', ` ;msc 4 `� .',, .: � , pi � `�+X � "p� F y7f .... - �:. � . - i -_ S ;. - ,,,• . �t !+� � '�a� � ._y p�,� � _ .�.. .. ,�.._ ��, . � . pt { ,y � ``.,� �" t s k"-:;�^'".�' r^'� r� ,� . , r � i � .; � � .. � � �� , ... � ., . �� .�'�� . - �, r . > ., `�x ,��t . �: � ' _ �� ; . . ., ,. .� �-.; ; , -� _ ; a _� � , �� - , * � t ' � ,�`'' v � »c : s � � ,; ' , �p-,,,- . - a ��", ,��'�'�1�t�+,�� , � - � f i �i . -� � .:�,- - �;'*�r t`�..-.. l �' � x ,:�: � r y� . .. , ,. ^,� �x :� L. � - . �� :�-,::.� - 1 .. � �� j , .. � =�� - � �: � _ .. �� . , . . . ' "''... [ �; T...�wF'i, � -:Iw � -.'F-S y ��,�t`_ : ..l°,:.r. �� ., , r �,' _'�� d%� k �-. .,u= ' .: �TSF �...: :..,�. ".Y ..s'S�h .S .: � ..n 1�" ....,„ - .l�..,a. ..�. ._..�. . .....�, �„ .:... ._�,. - .ir�t,-1.r.�,;:Y . �- . , !� . � _ : .,». . ,,.. , �,., .. . : .+,�. %� ��" �:� - M1. -" �,r'�.� 3 ': S :._�� 7- `S, ;. � .�:°, �..�cy: ., . _ . t .+ .:' . � ■ y._. �1 _ � . , ' r ,. } i � ,... . o� � �':-:.� �rr_z .._ ,.,., ,� _ . _ .:„ .. . r:; � . �s - � . �..:.. -..,.. .. .: - ` --..� _ , � , . �., ,� r,, t,. s . �_ . ��,- ,M :.� �-' . z x.u:.: ■ � - ' � . - .. . ..�.. -..,. _.::,.,. . . . .,....:.- . -.,, _._ . .:.. _. ..,. ._ . ` "..�' � � . s � 5 . ._�. � . . f. • . � . . �. . f, ,.n.-�� :..a.r .....;�- ..,�.:�. s+.._, _ _ .i.: 'r , . .. ., .. ��' � _ ' .��..' :' . ._. L ° .? . ,: M . . .... . � �:'.. ' ; �_ � , � a, : .; ' � c rv EF 'k , � �- -, .� �..y'. ..i, �r, .:. ` . ..,� �. }+ _ . ..:�t i:H G. ::?i- t �L.. .i . . -:. : � ... . '. S , -:: - F , a.�'! ■. , �y :: , :,�.:: ..�'.. :' �r . . .•. . .:..: _. . . , r._,-, . , ;��s . ,... -... . . r . _.-.. .-.,� .,. ..� ,._�� , �=�i � _ f;r � f" - <.. {i, r,v�'. ;�' . � �7s ,�< _ ,.:., ._,: . , ..�❑ ;' - rr'. " �, : � .� . , e � � �. � � � . .. ' . e' � ^.-: � �,t� 2 r. : ... _ .' a { . . : � � .. f. .. s.=.. r.��:�._ � f. :: . _ .. �� ,. . " .. � . , � _. i • �, _ : _ - � - , ' -'_ i . • , � , . , ,; „ . ;. , , � :< { , ° . �. s a--# � 's a�� ..a�:�: "`� � s.,: , , n Y t , S ,. , k � � �"t , ! � r. ,..: * ., ,. � , ::. ,� � � s .. q�,S'� <,. �. ^;� r _,, " , , + . � c a :.�y . .� _x . ` � . * , ..:x�. � a . , '�:� • � , ` � � . � � , SITE DA TA 385 MANDALA YA VE (DEVEL OPMENT SITE) 387 MANDAL4 YA VE (L OAD/NG ZONf PURPOSES ONL Y) COREDEVE�OPMEN7r /LL PROJECT EX/STING PROPOSED EX/STIN� PROPOSED ALLOWED► ZON/NG: T T ZON/NG: T T T FUTURE LAND USE.• RFH RFH FUTURE LAND USE: RFH RFH RFH 1ST FLODR - RETA/L USAGE.' 2ND FLDOR - 6ATTACHED RETAIL /RESTAURANT USAGE.' RETA/L RETA/L COMMERC/AIL DWELL/NG NITS B4O74 S.F. 8,074 S.F. 8,079 S.F. 8,079 S.F. N/A LOT AREA: 0.18 AC. 0.18 AC. LOT AREA: 0. 98 AC. 0.18 AC. LOT WIDTH.• (SOUTH) 908.10' (SOUTH) 108.10' ( WEST) 74.95' ( WEST) 74.95' LOT WIDTH.• 108.4' FT. 108.4' FT. N/A BUILD/NG COVERAGE.• 3,838 S.F. 3,988 S.F. BUILD/NG COVERAGE.• (S.F. &% OF GROSS SIT� 5,906 S.F. 5,906 S.F. N�A 47.5 % 49.3 3b (S.F. & 9b OF GROSS SIT� 73. �� 73.1 3b GROSS FLOOR AREA ( S.F.) : 7, 676 S.F. 7, 974 S.F. GROSS FLOOR AREA ( S.F.) : 5,906 S.F. 5,906 S.F. � � � F.A.R.: 0.95 0.987 F.A.R.: 0.73 0.73 3.8' TO BLDG. FRONT ( WES'n : 2 4� 3.2' OVER R/W TO CANOPY FRONT ( WES� : 4' TO BLDG. 4' N/A 0' TO PAVEMENT 0' TO COLUMN SIDE (NORTI-� : D' TO BLDG. 0' N�A 2.9' TO BLDG. SETBACKS: FRONT ( SOUTi'� : 2 4� 3.2' OVER R/W TO CANOPY SETBACKS: 0' TO PAVEMENT SIDE (SOUTI� : 0' TO BLDG. 0' 0' TO COLUMN N/A 39.6' TO BLDG. SIDE (EASn : 36' 25' TO STAIRWELL 23.9' TO BLDG. 23.9' TO BLDG. N�q 0' TO PAVEMENT REAR (EASn : 0' TO PAVEMENT 0' TO PAVEMENT 23.8' TD DUMPSTER ENC. SIDE ( NORTI� : 5.8' 0' TO BLDG. 0' TO BALCONY 0' TO DUMPSTER ENC. N�A BLDG. HEIGHT.• 1-STORY 1-STORY BLDG. HEIGHT.• 2-STORY 36.84' FROM BFE - PARPET 32.47' FROM BFE - ROOF DECK VEHICULAR USEAREA ( V. U.A.) 2, 363 S.F. 2,471 S.F. VEHICULAR USEAREA ( V, U.A.) 356 S.F. 356 S.F. --- IMPERVIOUS SURFACE RATIO: 7, 956 S. F. 7, 668 S. F. IMPERVIOUS SURFACE RATlO: 8, 076 S. F. 8, 076 S. F. �� S R� 0.98 0.95 0.99 0.99 0.95 MAX (I.S.R.) OPEN SPACE.• 918 S.F. 406 S.F. OPEN SPACE.• 3 S F. 3 S.F. (S.F. &% OF GROSS SIT� 1.46% 5.0% 0.03% 0.03% 0.05 MlN ( S.F. & 3b OF GROSS SlT�7 PARK/NG LOT INTERIOR LAND�SCAPE.- 0 S.F. PARKING LOT INTERIOR LANDSCAPE,• 0 S.F. 0 S.F. o p� N/A LESS THAN4,000 S.F. o N/A 0% 10% OF V.U.AI. (S.F. &/o OF V. U.A.) ( S.F. &/o OF V. U.A.) PARK/NG: 7 SPACES 3 SPACES PARK/NG: 0 SPACES 0 SPACES SEE BELOW PARK/NG CALCULATIONS FOR NEW DEVELOPMENT.• RETAIL 1,819 SF @ 5 SPACES/1000 = 10 SPACES RESTAUR.4NT 10,063 SF @ 15 SPACES/1000 = 151 SPACES PER SHARED PARKING TABLE SECTION 3-1405 76-159 PARKING SPACES REQUIRED TOTAL PARK/NG REQUIRED: 161 LEGAL DESCR/Pl/ON'S 385 MANDALAY AVE. (DEVELOPMENT SITE ) LEGAL DES RI PTI N C 0 LOTS 26, 27 AND 28, BLOCK A, BARBOUR—MORROW SUBDIVISION, ACCORDING TO THE MAP OR PLAT THEREOF AS RECORDED IN PLAT B K 00 23, PAGE 45, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA. 387 MAN DALAY AVE. (LOADING ZONE LOCATION) LEGAL DESCRIPTION LOTS 23, 24 AND 25, BLOCK A, BARBOUR—MORROW SUBDIVISION, ACCORDING TO THE MAP OR PLAT THEREOF AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 23, PAGE 45, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA. C1.1 C1.2 C2.1 C3.1 C4.1 C5.1 /NDEX OF SHEETS CIVIL SITE DATA CIVIL SITE SPECIFICATIONS DEMOLITION PLAN STAKING SITE PLAN GRADING & UTILITIES PLAN CIVIL SITE DETAILS I � �m d� �� a� �W _ ,� `� � � 'a, ykaci �� . ��t � _� � N � � �� d� i� _� = d m w . � 0 � 0 0 M . � Q � � .� � C � �° e � � ,� -•c � y �,.`�. H�� V i= � e � d � C � G�1 ,t �� c �o ,� �Q = c°', � e C d w � �:�3 � . p � +� C�O�iC> ;.� � � j� }y� � `��•�V� � y!' •��V�� . �.o ii '•�� ra »• � 4 �� f' � 4y �. ' �A I� � : � -' . m "�� .n � . ( ' RAlill A. GOE�; �h.D., P.E. #47431 COPlfS Of TH£Sf PUNS ARE N�T VAiID UNLfSS � fMBOSSfD WITH THE 3lGNlNG ENG/NfERS Sf,9L J Project # 1102 Issue Date: 05/06/11 Revisions: No. Date Descri tion 0 0 0 0 0 0 � 0 � � � � 0 W � � � �J � � � � V J J � a a a 0 Z Q � r M � OO M � ti W M M a� � w W Q � � Q a� � 1� W M t� Northsiae E��.�. s�. ��. ❑ � ti 0 � � �`� k �# �; I ; 0 GfNERAL CONSTRUCT/ON NOTES l. ALL DESlGN AND CONSTRUCT/ON MUST CONFORM TO THE M/N/MUM STANDARDS SET DOWN lN CITY OF CLEARWATER LAND DEVELOPMENr ZON/NC AND / OR RELATED ORDlNANCES. 2. ALL ELEVArIONS ARE REF£RENCED FROM N.A.V.D. 1988. 3. LOCATIONS, ELEVATlONS, AND DIMENS/ONS OF £XlSTING UTIUT/ES, STRUCTURES, AND OTHER FEATURES ARE SHOWN ACCORDlNG TO TNE BEST /NFORMAT/ON AVA/LABLE Ar THE rIME OF PREPARAT/ON OF THESE PLANS. THE CONTRACrOR W/LL VER/FY THE LOCATiONS, £LEVATIONS, AND DIMENS/�NS OF ALL EX/STING UTILlTIES, STRUCTURES AND OrHER FEATURES AFFECTING TH/S WORK PR/OR TO CONSTRUCTlON. 4. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CNECK TNE PLANS FOR CONFLICTS AND DISCREPANC/ES PR/OR i0 CONSTRUCTlON. rHE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE OWN£R S ENGlNEER OF ANY C�NFL/CTS OR DISCR£PANC/fS BEFORE PERF�RMING ANY VYORK !N THE AFF£CTED AREA. 5. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL EXERC/S£ EXTR£ME CAUTION lN AREAS OF BURIED UTIL/TIES, AND SHALL PROVlDE AT LEASr 48 HOURS NOrlCE TO TH£ VAR/0US UTIL/TY COMPAN/ES, IN ORD£R TO P£RMIT MARKlNG THE LOCATIONS OF EX/ST/NG UNDERGROUND UTILITIES, lN ADVANC£ OF CONSTRUCTlON, BY CALL/NG "SUNSH/NE" AT l-800-432-4770 M/N/MUM OF 2 DAYS ANO MAXIMUM OF 5 DAYS PRlOR TO THE STARr OF CONSTRUCTlON. THE CONTRACTOR /S RESP�NSIBL£ FOR CONTACTlNG ALL UTIL/TlES NOr lNCLUDED /N THE 'SUNSHINE" PROGRAM. 6. CONrRACTOR /S SOLELY RESPONSlBLE FOR CONSTRUCl/ON SAFETY. SPEC/AL PRECAUTiONS MAY BE REQUIRED !N TH£ V/C/NlTY OF POWER L/NES AND OTHER UTIL/TifS. 7. ALL UNDERGROUNO UrILITlES MUST BE /N PLACE AND T£STED AND INSPECTfD PR/OR r0 BAS£ AND SURfACE CONSTRUCTlON. 8. lT /S THE CONrRACTOR S RESPONS/BJL/TY TO BECOME FAM/LIAR W/TH THE PERMlT AND /NSPECTlDN REQU/REMENTS OF THE VAR/DUS GOVERNMENTAL AGENC/ES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAlN ALL N£C£SSARY PERMIrS PR/OR r0 CONSTRUC170N, SCHEDULE /NSPfCrIONS ACCORDlNG TO AG£NCY INSTRUCT/ON AND THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PAY ANY FINE IMPOS£D BY ANY AG£NCY. 9. 1'HE CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMlT FOR APPROVAL TO THf OWNER'S ENG/NEER,� SHOP DRAW/NGS ON ALL PRECAST AND MANUFACTURED ITEMS FOR THIS S/Tf. FA/LURf TO OBTA/N APPROVAL B£FORE lNSTALLAT/ON MAY RESUL r lN R£MOVAL AND REPLACEMENT AT THE CONTRACTOR'S EXP£NS£. ALL SHOP DRAW/NCS AR£ TO B£ RfV/fWfD AND APPROV£D BY THE CON1'RACTOR PR/OR i0 SUBMITTAL TO THE OWNER S ENG/NEER. 10. AT LEAST THRfE (3) WORK/NG DAYS PRlOR TO CONSTRUCTION, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOrIFY THE ENGlN£ER AND APPROPR/ATE AGENC/ES, AND SUPPLY THEM WITH ALL REQUlR£D SHOP ORAWINGS, TNf CONTRACTOR S NAME, START/NG DATE, PROJfCTED SCH£DULf, AND OTHER /NFORMAT/ON AS REQU/RED. ANY WORK PERFORMED PR/OR TO NOiIFYING THE ENGINEER, �R WITHOUT AGENCY lNSP£CTOR PRESENT, MAY BE SUBJ£CT r0 REMOVAL AND REPLACfMENr AT THE CONTRACTOR S EXPENSE. 11. BACKF/LL MATER/AL SHALL BE SOL/DLY TAMPfD AROUND PIPES !N 6" LAYERS UP TO A LEVEL OF Al LfAST ONE FOOT ABOVE rHE TOP OF THE P/P£. /N AREAS TO BE PAVED, BACKFILL SHALL BE COMPACT£D TO 100% MAX/MUM DfNS/TY AS DETERM/NED BY AASHTO T-99. 12. CONCR£TE SHALL NAVE A COMPRESS/V£ STR£NGTN OF Ar LEAST 3,OOD P.S.I. !N 28 DAYS, UNLESS OTHERW/SE NOTED. 13. ALL PR/VATE AND PUBLlC PROPERTY AFFfCTfO BY TNE W�RK SHALL BE RESrORED TO A CONDlTI�N £QUAL TO OR BETTER THAN £K1STlNG CONDlT/ONS UNL£SS SP£C/F/CALLY £X£MPTED BY TH£ PLANS. ADDlTIONAL COSTS ARE /NCIDENTAL 70 OTHER CONSTRUCTION AND NO EXTRA COMPENSAT/ON /S TO BE ALLOWED. 14. ALL D/STURB£D AREAS WNICH ARE NOT TO 8E SODDfD, ARf TO B£ SEEDED AND MULCHED TO DOr STANDAROS, AND MA/NTAINED UNTIL A SATISFACTORY SrAND OF GRASS, ACCEPTABLE TO THE REGULATORY AGENCY AND ENG/NE£R OF RECORD, HAVE BEEN OBTA/NfO. ANY WASHOUTS, R£GRAD/NG, RESEEDING, AND GRASS/NG WORK, AND OTHER EROS/ON WORK REOUIRED, WILL B£ P£RfORMED BY THE CONTRACTOR, AT H/S EXPENSE, UNTlL THE SYST£M /S ACCEPTED FOR MAiNTENANCE, BY THE REGULATORY AGENCY AND ENG/NfER OF RECORD. 15. THE SOILS ENG/NEER !S TO SUPPLY TN£ fNG/NEER WITH A PHOTOCOPY OF ALL COMPACTlON TESrS, AND ASPHALr R£SULTS. 7Hf SO/LS ENG/N£fR /S TO C£RTIFY TO TNE ENG/NEER OF RECORD, lN WR/T/NG, THA1' ALL T£SrING R£QU/R£MFNTS, RE UIRfD BY THE LOCAL REGULATORY AGENCY AND THE FLORlDA D£PARTM N OF 0 , E T TRANSPORrAT10N (FDOT), FOR rHE IMPROVEMENTS, AS REQU/RED BY 1'HE ENG/NEER/NG CONSTRUCTlON DRAWINGS, HAVE 8£EN SAT/SFIED. 16. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTA/N A COPY OF THE APPROVfD PL4NS AND PERM/TS AT THE CONSTRUCT/ON SITE. 17. THESE DRAW/NGS D� N07 (NCLUDE NECESSARY COMPON£NTS FOR CONSTRUC7/ON SAFETY. TNE CONrRACTOR /S SOLELY RfSPONS/BLE fOR MEANS AND METHODS FOR CONSrRUCTlON SIrE SAFETY. 18. ALL SODD/NG, SEED/NG AND MULCH/NG SHALL /NCLUDE WATER/NG AND FERTILlZATION. THE CONTRACrOR SHALL BE RESPONS/BLf FOR MAINTA/N/NG 1'HESE AREAS UNTIL THE PROJECT /S COMPLETED AND ACCEPTED BY 7HE OWNER. 19. ALL P/P£ LENGTHS ARE PLUS OR MlNUS. PlP£ MEASUR£MENTS ARE C£NTER TO CENTER OF STRUCTURES OR F1Tr1NGS. P/PE MEASUREMENTS FOR MlT£RED END SECT/ONS AR£ TO END OF P/PE. 20. EX/STING PAVEMENT SHALL BE SAW-CUT WHERE NEW PAVEM£NT /S TO BE ADOED OR EX/Sr1NG PAVEMENT TO B£ EL/MINATED. 21. ADJUSTMENTS OF lNLETS, JUNCrI�N BOXES, MANHOL£ TOPS, WA1'ER VALVES, WATfR M£T£RS, ETC., SHALL Bf /NCLUDED /N THf CON1'RACTOR S BlD AND NO CLA/M SHALL BE MADE AGA/NST THE OWNER OR ENGINEER FOR THESE ADJUSTM£NTS, lF RfQU/RED. 22. ALL BACKF/LL OVER ANY P/PE (STORM SfWER, SANlTARY S£WER, OR WATERUNES) TNAT /5 /NSTALLED UNDER ROADWAYS OR WITN/N THE EMBANKMENT OF TH£ ROADWAY, SHALL BE COMPACTfD 1N ACCORDANCf W/TH F.D.O.T. SrANDARO SPECIFlCAr10NS, SECT/ON 125-8.3, LATEST ED/T/ON. 23. THE CONTRACTOR PERFORM/NC TRENCH EXCAVATION, lN EXCESS Of 5' FEET /N D£PTH, SHALL COMPLY W/TN 1'HE OCCUPAT/OIJAL SAFETY AND HfALTH ADM/NlSrRAT/ON S (OSHA) TRENCH EXCAVAT/ON SAFETY STANDARDS, 29 C.F.R., S.1926.650, SUBPART P, lNCLUDlNG ALL SUBSEQU£NT REVISIONS OR UPDATES TO THE STANDARDS AS ADOPrED BY TH£ DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND fMPLDYMENT SECURITY (DLES). 24. CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE THf PDINTS OF CONNECT/ONS OF THE UT/LITIES W/TH D/FFERENT SUBS. SITE CONTRACTOR TO CONSTRUCT THE UNDERGROUND lNFRASTRUCTURES i.e. SANITARY SEWER, STORM S£WFR, WATER LlNES, f/RE UNES, ETC., TO 5' OUTSIDE OF rHE BLDC(5). THE PLUMB/NG CONTRACTOR /S TD CONNECT AND Mffi TH£ /NVERl ELEVATIONS �F rH£ SA/D UT/Ll17ES. ANY UTILITY WORK PERFORMED WITHlN 5' OF THE BLDG. SHALL B£ TNE RESPONS/B/LITY OF THE PLUMBlNG CONTRACTOR. ALL WORK SHALL COMPLY W/lH ALL APPLlCABLf FED£RAL, STA7E, AND LOCAL CODES, ORD/NANCES AND R£qU1REMENTS 25. ALL WORK SNALL BE PERFORMED AND F/N/SNED /N A WORKMANUKE MANNER TO COMPLfTE SATISFACT/ON OF TH£ ARCH/lECT/ENG/NEER !N ACCORDANCE W/TH rHE BEST RECOGN/ZED TRAD£ PRACTICES. 26. D£VlAT/ONS TO TNESE PLANS AND SPEC/F/CAT/ONS WITHOUT CONSENT OF THE ENG/NEfR MAY BE CAUSE FOR THE WORK TO BE UNACC£PTABLE. DEVIAiIONS SHALL RfCElVf WR/TTEN APPROVAL fROM iHE ENG/NffR. 27. S/GNS, BUFFER WALLS & FENCfS AR£ SUBJfCT TD SEPARAT£ SUBM/TTAL(S) AND PERM/TTfNG. DfViATlONS SHALL RECEIVE WRITTEN APPROVAL FROM THE ENGINEER. 28. SAFE PEDESTR/AN TRAFF/C TO BE MA/NTAINED AT ALL TIMES. 29. ANY S/DEWALK WH/CH BECOMES UNDERMINED MUST BE REMOVED AND REPLACED. S/DEWALKS TO BE RECONS]'RUCTED WlTH/N THREE DAYS AFT£R REMOVAL. WHEN EX/STJNG S/DEWALK /S R£MOVED lT lS TO BE REMOVED TO 7HE NEAREST JOINT. rH/S APPLIES TO ALL SIDEWALK. 30. SAW CUT EXISTlNG EOGE OF PAV£M£NT PRIOR T� PLACING ASPHALT 31. CONSiRUCT10N EQUIPMENT IS NOr ALLOWED ON SlTE UNTIL THf NAB/TAT MANAG£MfNT AND LANDSCAPE PERMIT /S /N HAND. CLEAR/NG AND GRUBB/NG NOTES 1. PRlOR TO ANY SIrE CLEAR/NG, ALL TRf£S SHOWN TO REMA/N ON THE CONSTRUCTION PLANS SHALL BE PROTECT£D lN ACC�RDANCf W/TH THE LOCAL RE6ULA70RY ACENCY S ` lREf ORD/NANCE AND Df1'A/LS CONl'A/NED /N rHESE PLANS. !T SHALL BE THE CONTRACrOR'S RESPONS/B/L/TY TO MA/NTA/N THESE rREfS IN GOOD CONDiTION. 2. 7HE CONTRACTOR /S TO PREPARE TH£ Slif PR/OR TO BEC/NNlNG TH£ ACTUAL CONSTRUCT/ON /N ACCORDANCf, W1rH THE SOILS TfST/NC RfPORr COPI£S OF 7Hf SOILS REPORT ARE AVA/L.4BLE THROUGH THf OWN£R OR THf SO/LS TESTlNG COMPANV. QUESTIONS RfGARDING SITf PR£PARATION REQU/REMENTS DESCR/BED /N f THE SO/LS R£PORT ARE TO BE D/RECTED TO THE SOlLS TESTING COMPANY. 3. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CLfAR AND GRUB, ONLY THOSE PORTIONS �F TH£ S/Tf, NECESSARY FOR C�NS7RUCTlON. OlSTURBED AREAS WILL B£ SEEDED, MULCH£D, OR PLANrED WIrH OTHER APPROVED LANDSCAPE MATER/AL IMMED/ATELY FOLLOW/NG coasrRUCrioN 4. rH£ TDP 4" 70 6" OF GROUND REMDVED DURING CLEAR/NG AND GRUBBING SHALL BE STOCKP/LED AT A SITE DES/GNATfD BY TH£ OWNER TO BE USfD FOR LANOSCAPlNG PURPOSES, UNLESS OTNERWISE DIRECTED BY THf OWNER. 5. ALL CONSTRUCT/ON D£BRIS AND OTHER WASiE MATER/AL SHALL B£ DISPOSED OF OFF-SlT£ lN ACCORDANC£ WITH APPLICABL£ R£GULATIONS. �NLY 'GRAD/NG BY HAND" 15 PERM/TTED W17H/N TH£ CANOPY L/N£ OF TRf£S THAT ARE TO RfMAIN. 6. THE CONTRACrOR /5 TO OBTAIN ALL NECESSARY P£RMITS FOR REMOV/NG ANY EXIST/NG SrRUCTURES. 7. lT /S TH£ CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSlBILIrY TO NOTIFY ALL UTILITY COMPAN/ES TO OlSCONNECT OR REMOVE rNE/R FAC/L/T/ES PRIOR TO REMOV/NG OR DEMOL/SH/NG. 8. THE CONTRACTOR W/LL B£ R£SPONSIBLE FOR MAK/NG A V/SUAL /NSPECTION OF THE S/T£ AND WILL Bf RESPONS/BLE FOR THE DEMOL/T/ON AND RfMOVAL OF ALL UNDERGROUND AND ABOVf GROUND S7RUCTUR£S THAT WILL NOT Bf lNCORPORATED INTO THE NEW FACIL/TlfS SHOULD ANY DISCREPANC/ES EX/ST W/TH THE PLANS, THE C�NTRACTOR SHALL Bf RESPONSIBL£ FOR CALUNG THE OWNER ANO R£QUESTING A CLARIF/CAT/ON OF THE PIANS PR/OR TO D£MOUT/ON. 9. DUR/NG CONSTRUCTION, ALL STORM SfWER /NLETS /N THf V/C/N/TY OF TH£ PROJ£CT SHALL BE PROTECTfO BY SEDIMENT TRAPS SUCH AS S ECURED HAY BALES, SOD, SI'ON£, ETG WN/CH SHALL B£ MAINTA/NfD AND M00/FlED AS REQU/RED 8Y CONSTRUCTION PROGRESS. 10. ALL EROSION AND S/LTATION CONTROL M£THODS SHALL BE /MPLfMENTED PR/OR TO rNE START OF CONSTRUCTlON AND MAINTAINED UNT/L C�NSTRUCTION !S COMPLfTE. f 1. WHEN CONSTRUCT/ON /S COMPLETED, THE RETENT/0N/DfrENTION AREAS WILL Bf R£SHAPED, CLEANED OF SlLT, MUD AND D£BRIS, AND RE-SODOED /N ACCORDANCE WITN THE PLANS. 12. CONTRACiOR lS TO PROV/DE EROSION CONTROL/SEDIMENTAT/ON BARR/ER (HAY BALES OR S/LTATION CURTA/N) TO PREVENT SILTAiION OF ADJACENT PROPfRTIES, STREETS, STORM SEWERS, WATERWAYS, AMD EXISTING WETLANDS. EROS/ONAND S/LTATION COMTROL NOTES 1. SED/MENT TRAPP/NG MEASURES: SED/MENT BAS/NS AND TRAPS, PER/MflER BERMS, FlLTER F£NCES, BERMS, SEDlMENT BARR/ERS, VEGETATlVE BUFFERS AND OTH£R MEASURES /NTENDED r0 TRAP SEDlMENT AND/OR PREVENT TNE TRANSPORT OF SED/MENr ONTO ADJACENT PROPERTlES, OR /NT0 EXIST/NG WAT£R BOD/ES, MUST BE INSTALLED, CONSTRUCTED OR, lN THE CASE OF VEGETAT/V£ BUFFERS, PROTECrED FROM DlSrURBANCE, AS A F/RST STEP /N THE LAND ALTERATION PROCESS SUCH SYSTEMS SHALL BE FULLY OP£RATIVE ANO /NSPECTED BY THE £NCINEER BfFORE ANY OTH£R D/STURBANCE OF TNE SlTE BECINS. 2. PROTECTION OF EX/STING STORM S£WER SYS?EMS: DURING CONSTRUCT/0N, ALL ST�RM SEWER lNL£rS lN THE V!ClNITY OF TH£ PROJfCT SHALL BE PROTECTED BY SED/MENT TRAPS SUCH AS S£CURED HAY �BALfS, SOD, STONE, ETC., WHlCH SHALL BE MAINrAINED AND MOD/F/ED AS REOUIRED B!Y CONSTRUCiION PROGRESS, AND WHICH M(1Si BE APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER BfFORE INSTALLATlON. 3. Sf0/MENTArION BAS/N: TH£ CONTRACTOR W/LL BE REQU/RfD TO PROHIBlT D/SCHARGf OF SILT THROUGH THf OUTFALL STRUCTURIE DURING CONSTRUCT/ON OF ANY R£TENTION ARfA AND WILL B£ REOU/RED TO CLEAN O�UT TH£ RETENT/ON AREA BEFORE /NSTALUNG ANY PfRMANfNT SUBDRA/N PIPE. lN ADDI'T/ON, PERMANfNT R£TfNT/ON AREAS MUST BE TOTALLY CLEANED OUT AND OPERAT£ PROP£RLY Ar FINAL /NSPfCrlON AND AT THE £ND OF THE WARRANTY PER/OD. 4. SWALES, Dl7CNfS AND CHANN£LS: ALL SIWALES, DlTCHES AND CHANNELS LfAD/NG FR�M THE S/Tf SHALL Bf SODDED WITH/N (3) DAYS OF EXCAVATION. ALL OTHfR INTER/OR SWAL£S, £TC., INCLUDlNG DETENJ�I�N AREAS WILL BE SODDED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A CERTlF/CATE OF OCCUPANCY. 5. PROTECTION AND SiAB/LIZATlON OF SO/L STOCKPILES F/LL MATER/AL STOCKP/LES SHALL BE PROTECTED AT ALL TIMES BY OM!-S/TE DRAlNAGE CONTROLS WN/CH PREVfNT EROS/ON OF THE STOCKPILEO MA;TERlAL CONTROL OF DUST FROM SUCH STOCKPlL£D MA7'£RIAL, MAY BE REOUIRED, DEPENDINC UPON THE/R LOCAT/ON AND THE EXPECTED LENGTH OF T/ME THE STOCKPILES W/LL BE PRESENT. lN NO CASE SHALL UNSTAB/LIZED STOCKP/LE RfMA/N AFTER iHlIRTY (3D) CALENDAR DAYS. 6. MA/NTENANCE: ALL EROSION AND SlLTATION CONTROL DEVlCES SHALL Bf CHECKED REGUL4RLY, £SPECIALLY AFT£R EACH RAIN�ALL AND W/LL Bf CL£AN£D OUT AND/OR REPAIR£D AS REQUIRED. 7. REQU/RED EROS/ON CONTROL M£ASURES MUST REMAIN /NTACT 7HROUGHOUT CONSTRUCT/ON. FA/LURE TO /NSTALL OR PR�PERLY MAlNTA/N THESE BARR/CADES W/LL RESULT lN ENFORCfMfNT ACTION WHICH MAY INCLUDE CITArIONS, AS PROV/DED BY CHAPrERS 40D-4 dc 400-40 F.A.C. CAN RESULT JN A P£NALTY NOT TO EXCEED �fO,DOD PER OFF£NSE WITH EACH DAT£ DURING WH/CH :SUCH VIOLArION OCCURS CONSTITUT/NG A OFFfNSE. 8. ALL D/STURBED COND/T/ONS SHALL BE RESTORED l0 NATURAL COND/T/ONS OR BETTfR. 9. DUR/NG CONSTRUCTION SED/MENT !S TO REMA/N ON S/TE. TH£ C�NTRACTOR lS RfSPONSlBLE FOR TNE /NSTALLATION OF EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL D£VlCES PR/OR TO 1N/l/AT/NC AND DUR/NG ALL PHA�ES OF LAND CLfAR/NC AND CONSTRUCT/ON TO PREV£NT SO/L EROSION AND SILTATiON. WATER SYSTEM SPECIF/CATInNS AND NOTES 1. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT B£G/N CONSrRUCT/ON ON ANY PART OF THE WATER SYSTEM UNLESS D.E.P. PERMIT HAS BfEN ISSU£D. 2. ALL WATER MAlNS SHALL HAV£ A MlN/MUMI OF 36 /NCHFS �F COVER. 3. ALL WATER SYSTEM WORK SHALL CONFORAtif W/TH LOCAL AND STArE R£GULATORY STANDAROS AND SPEC/F/CATIONS. 4. ALL DUCTlLE IRON P/PE SHALL B£ CLASS :52 /N ACCORDANC£ WITH ANS! A 21.50 (AWWA C 150) AND ANS/ A 21.31 (AWWA C 151) AND PIPE SNALL RfCE/V£ EXTER/OR BlTUMINOUS COATlNG lN ACCORD�4NC£ WITH ANS/ A 21.6, A 21.B OR A 21.51 ANO SHALL BE MORTAR L/NED, STAANDARD THICKNESS, AND B/TUMINOUS SEALED IN ACCORDANCf WfIK ANS! A 21.41 (AWWA C f04-71). 5. ALL FlTTINGS LARGER THAN 2° SHALL BE �DUCT2E IRON CLASS 53 /N ACCORDANC£ WIrH AWWA C-110 WITH A PRESSURf RArIING OF 350 PSI. JOlNTS SHALL Bf MECHANlCAL JOlNTS /N ACCORDANCE W/TH AK'WA C-111. FITTINGS SHALL 8E CEMENT MORTAR LINED AND COATED IN AC�CORDANCE W/TH AWWA C-f04. 6. ALL PVC WATER MA/NS 4" THROUGH 12" .SHALL BE /N ACCOROANCE W/TH AWWA C-900. PIPE SHALL B£ CLASS l50 AND MIfET THE REQUIREMENTS OF SOR 18 /N ACCORDANC£ YYITH ASTM D-2241. 7. WATER MAIN P!PlNG Of L£SS THAN 4" SH',�4LL B£ PER ASTM D2241-89. 8. ALL FITTINCS 2" AND SMALLER SHALL BE SDR21. 9. ALL GATE VALVES 2" OR LARGER SHALL B�E RES/LI£NT SEAT OR RESIL/ENr WEDG£ MEET/NG THE RfQU/REMENTS OF AWWA C509. f0. ALL F/RE HYDRANTS SHALL M££T THE R£QU/REMENTS OF AWWA C502 AND SHALL BE APPROVED BY TNE LOCAL UT/LITY AND FIRE MARSHALL. 1 i. THE CONTRACTOR /S T� 1NSTALL TEMPORARY BLOW-OFFS Al rHE fND OF WATfR SfRV/C£ L4TERALS T� ASSURE AD£QUATE FLUSHING AND DISINFECT/ON. 12. RESTRAINED JO/NTS SHALL B£ PROV/D£D AT ALL FITT/NGS AND NYDRANTS. f3. MATER/ALS AND CONSTRI/CTION METNODS FOR WATER DISTRIBUrION SYSTEM SHALL BE /N ACCORDANCE WITH THE LOCAL REGUL4TDRY AGENCY COD£S. 14. THE /RRl6ATlON SYSTEM SHALL HAVf PURPLE COLOR P/P/NC AND LABfLING ON rHE P/Pf TO INSUR£ DIFFERENT/ATION FROM POTABLE WATER P/PlNG. WATER SYSTEM /NSPECTION, TEST/NG AND CERT/F/CAT/ON REQU/REMENTS t. ALL COMPON£NTS OF 7HE WAT£R SYSTEM, lIVCLUD/NG F/TTlNGS, CONN£CT/ONS, VALVES AND F/R£ HYDRANTS SNALL RfMA/N UNCOV£RED UNTIL PROPERLY PRESSURE TESTED AND ACCEPTED BY NORTNSIDE ENGINEER/NG AND COUNTY/CIrY lNSPECTOR. CONTR,4CTOR TO NOrIFY NORTHS/DE ENGlNEERING SERVICES AND WATER DEPARTMENT INSPECTORS 48 HOURS /N ADVANCE OF PERFORMING INSP£CT/ONS 2. AFTER COMPL£T/ON OF /NSTALLA170N OF NEW W,4TER MA/NS, PRESSURE T£STING SHALL BE PERFORMED 1N ACCORDANCE WITH THE LOCAL & STAT£ JUR/S0lCT/ON'S WAT£R SYSTEM STANDARDS, SPEClFICAT/ONS AND CHLORINATlON R£QUIREMENTS. SAMPL/NG OF NEW WATER MAlNS SHALL CONFORM W/TH F.D.E.P. R£QUIREMEN'TS AND RESULTS F�RWARDED TO NORTHSIDE £NG/NEERlNG SERV/CES W/TH/N 3 DAYS 3. CONrRACTOR SHALL PROV/D£ AND F�RWARD' r0 NORTHSIDE ENG/NEER/NG 6 C�PIES OF THf CERTIFI£D REC�RD ORAWINGS PREPAREO, S/GNED AND SEALEO BY A LAND SURVEYOR. DRAW/NGS SHALL SHOW rHE EXACT LOCAT/ON OF THE ENrIRE WATER AND FIRE NErWORK SYSTfM W/TH TH£ TOP ELEVAT/ON OF THE �PIP£S /NDICATED lN CRED/CAL LOCAT/ONS. CRfDlCAL LOCATlONS REFER TO AREAS WHERE WATER L/NES CROSS SAN/TARY AND STORM P/PES, TO INSUkE M/N. COVER, HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL DIMENSlONS ARE MET CRfD/CAL ELEVAT/ONS AND O/MENS/ONS MUST MEET OR EXC£ED M1NlMUM CLEARANCE STANDARDS AS SfT BY F.D.E.P., DEVIAT/ON SNALL CONSTlTUTE REMOVAL AND REPLACEMENT Ar CONTRACTOR S EXPENSf. 4. NORrHSlDE fNGlNEER/NG WILL SUBM/T FINAL AS-BUILT, CHLOR/NATJON TEST Rf5ULT5 ALONG WIrH TH£ CERTIFlCATION FORM TO F.D.E.P. TO OBTAIN CLEARANCE TO PLACE WATfR SYSTEM INTO SERV/C£. 5. CONTRACTOR UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCES SHALL PLAC£ THE WATER/F/RE SYSTEM INTO SERV/Cf UNLESS A LETTfR OF CLEARANCE/CERT/F/CATION NAS BEEN /SSUED BY f.D.E.P. 6. ANY OEV/AT/ON FROM THE REQU/REMENTS AS STIPULATED HEREWlTH COULD R£SULT lN F/NES AS DETERMINEO BY F.D.f.P. WH/CH SHALL Bf PAID BY TH£ CONTRACTOR. WATER/SEWER CLEARANCE REQU/REMENTS 62-555.314 LOCATlON OF PUBL/C WATER SYSTEM MAINS FOR THE PURPOSE Of TH/S SECTION, THE PHASE "WArER MAlNS" SHALL M£AN MAlNS, INCLUO/NC TR£ATMENT PLANT PROCESS P/P/NG, CONVfY/NC E/TNER RAW, PART/ALLY TREATED, OR F!NISHfD OR/NK/NG WATER, F/RE HYDRANT LEADS, AND S£RV/C£ UNES 1'HAi ARE UNDER THE CONTROL OF A PUBLIC WA7ER SYSTEM AND THAT HAVf AN /NS/DE DIAMETER OF rHR£E INCHES OR GR£ATER. (1) HORlZONTAL SfPARATlON B£TWEEN UNDERGROUND WATER MAINS AND SANITARY OR STORM SfW£RS, WAST£WATER OR STORMWATER FORCE MAINS, RECLAlM£D WATfR PlPELlNES, AND ON-SITE SEWAG£ TR£ATMENT AND D/SPOSAL SYSTEMS (A) N£W OR R£LOCAl£D, UNDERCROUND WATER MA/NS SHALL BE LA/D TO PROV/DE A HOR/ZONTAL DlSrANCE OF AT L£AST THREE FEET BETW£EN THE DUTS/D£ OF THE WATER MA1N AND THE OUTSIDE OF ANY £XIST/NG OR PROPOSED STORM SEWfR, STORMWATER FORCE MA/N, OR P/PEL/NE CONVEYING RECLA/M£D WATER R£GULArEO UNDER PART !ll OF CHAPTER 62-6f0,F.A.C. (B) NEW OR RELOCATED, UNDERGROUND WATfR MAlNS SNALL 8E LA/D TO PROV/DE A NORIZ�NTAL D/STANCE OF AT LEAST iNREE FEET, AND PREFERABLY TEN FE£T, B£TWEEN THf OUTSlDE OF THE WATER MAIN AND THE OUTSIDE OF ANY fXIST/NC OR PROPOSED VACUUM-TYPE SANITARY SEW£R. (C) NEW OR RELOCAT£D, UNDERGROUND WATER MAINS SHALL BE LA/0 TO PROVlO£ A HOR/ZONTAL D/STANCE OF AT LEAST SlX FEET, AND PR£FERABLY TEN F£f7, BfTWEfN TH£ OUTS/DE OF THE WATER MAlN AND TH£ OUTS/D£ �F ANY EX/STING OR PROPOSED GRAVIrY-�R PRESSURE-TYPE SAN/TARY SEWER, WAST£WAI'ER FORC£ MAlN, OR P/P/NG CONVfY/NG R£CLA/MED WATER NO! REGUCATED UNDER PART /I/ OF CNAPTER 62-6f0, F.A.C. lH£ M/N/MUM HORlZONTAL SfPARAT/ON D/STANCf B£TW£E� WAT£R MAINS AND GRAVITY-TYPE SAN/TARY SEW£RS SHALL BE REDUCED TO THR£E F££T WH£Rf TH£ BOTTOM OF THE WATfR MAIN /S LAID AT LEAST S/X /NCHES ABOVE THf TOP OF TN£ SEW£R. (C) NEW OR RfLOCAT£D, UNDERGROUND WArfR MAINS SHALL 8f LA/D TO PROVIDE A HOR/ZONTAL D/STANCE OF AT LEAST SlX FEET AND PRfFERABLY T£N FEET, BETW£EN THE OUTS/DE �f THE WATER MAIN AND THE OUTS/Df OF ANY EXlSTING OR PROPOS£0 GRAV/TY-OR PRESSURE-TYP£ SANlT,4RY 5£WER WASTEWATER FOR V , CE MAIN, OR P/PlNG CON EY/NG RECLA/MED WATER NOT RE6ULATfD UNDER PART Ill OF CNAPTER 62-610, F.A.C. THE MlNIMUM HOR/ZONTAL SEPARATION DISTANCE BETWEEN WATER MAINS AND GRAVITY-rYPE SANIrARY SEWERS SHALL BE REDUC£D TO THREE F£ET WHERE TH£ BOTTOM OF TNE WArER MAlN IS LAID AT LfAST 5!X lNCH£S ABOV£ THE TOP OF THE S£WfR. (D) NEW OR RELOCATfO, UNDERGROUND WATER MAINS SHALL BE LA/D T� PROVIDE A HOR/ZONTAL DISTANC£ OF AT LEAST TEN FEEr BETW£EN THf OUTS/DE OF TH£ WATfR MAIN AND ALL PARrS OF ANY EX/STlNG OR PROPOSED "ON-SITE SEWAGE TREArM£NT AND DISP�SAL SYSTfM" AS DEF/NED lN SECTlON 381.0065(2), F.S., AND RULf 64E-6.002, F.A.C. (2) VfRTICAL SEPARATION BETW£EN UNDERGROUND WAT£R MA/NS AND SANlTARY OR STORM SEWERS, WAST£WATER OR STORMWATER FORCE MA/NS, AND R£CLA/MED WA1'ER P/PfLINES. (A) NEW OR RELOCATED, UND£RGROUND WAT£R MA/NS CROSS/NG ANY EXlSTlNG OR PROPOSED GRAVITY-OR VACUUM-TYPE SANITARY SEWER OR STORM SEWER SHALL BE LA/D SO THE OUTSIOE �F TH£ WATER MA/N /S AT LEAST SlX /NCHES, ANO PREFERABLY 12 /NCHES, ABOVE OR AT LEAST 12 INCH£5 BEL�W THE OUTSlDf OF THE OTH£R PIPEL/Nf. HOWEVER, 1T l5 PREFERABL£ TO LAY THE WATER MA/N ABOVE THE OTN£R P/PELINf. (B) NEW OR RELOCATED, UNDERGR�UND WATER MA/NS CROSS/NG ANY EX/STING OR PROPOSED PR£SSURf-TYPf SANITARY SEWER, WAST£WATER OR STORMWATfR FORCE MA/N, OR P/PELINE CONVEYINC RECLAIM£D WATER SHALL B£ LAID SO THE OUTSIDf OF TH£ WATER MAIN /S AT LfAST 12 lNCH£S ABOVf OR B£LOW TNf OUTS/DE OF THE OTHfR PlP£L/NE. HOWEVER lT lS PREFERABLf TO LAY THE WATER MAIN ABOVf THE OTHER PIPEL/Nf. (C) AT TH£ UT/LIrY CROSS/NG OESCR/BED !N PARAGRAPHS (A) AND (B) AB�VE, �Nf FULL LENGTH DF WATER MAIN PIPE SNALL Bf CENTERED ABOV£ OR BELOW THf OTHER PIPEUNE SO THE WATER MA/N JOINTS WILL BE AS FAR AS POSSIBLE FROM THE OTHER PlP£LINE. ALTERNATlVELY, AT SUCH CROSSINCS, THE PIPES SNALL BE ARRANGED SO THAT ALL WATER MAIN JOINTS ARE AT LEAST THR£E FEET FROM ALL JOlNTS IN VACUUM-TYPE SAN/TARY SEWERS, STORM SEWERS, STORMWATER FORCE MA/NS, OR PIPEL/NES CONV£Y/NG RECLA/MED WATER R£GULATfD UNDER PART Ill OF CHAPTER 62-6f0, F.A.C., AND AT LEAST SlX FEET FROM ALL JOINTS IN CRAVITY-OR PRESSURE-1'YPf SANITARY SEWERS, WAST£WATER FORC£ MAINS, OR PIPELINES CONVEYING RECLA/M£D WATER NOT R£GULATED UNDER PART l!l OF CHAPTER 62-610, F.A.C. (3) SfPARATION B£TWEEN WATER MA/NS AND SAN/TARY OR STORM SEWER MANHOLES. (A) NO WAT£R MA/N SHALL PASS THROUGH, OR COME INTO CONTACr N'ITH, ANY PART OF A SANITARY S£WfR MANHOLE. (B) EFFECTIV£ AUGUST 28, 2003, WATER MA/NS SHALL N01' BE CONSTRUCTED OR ALTERED TO PASS THROUGH, OR COME INTO CONTACT WITH, ANY PART OF A STORM S£WER MANHOLf OR INLET STRUCTUR£. WHfRE /T /S NOT T£CHN/CALLY F£ASIBLE OR EC�NOMICALLY SENSIBLE TO COMPLY W/TH THIS REQUIREMENT (l.E., WHER£ iN£RE lS A CONFLICT !N TH£ ROUTING OF A WATER MAIN AND A STORM SEWER AND WHER£ ALTERNATlVE ROUTlNG OF TH£ WAT£l7 MA/N OR iHE STORM S£WER !S NOT T£CHNICALLY FEASIBLE OR lS NOT ECONOMICALLY SENS/BLE), TH£ DfPARTMfNT SNALL ALLOW £XCEPT/ONS TO THIS REQUIR£MENT l.£., THE DEPARTM£NT SHALL ALLOW CONSTRUCT/ON OF CONFL/CT MANNOLES), BUT SUPPLI£S OF WAT R OR PERSONS PROPOS/NC TO CONSTRUCT CONFLICT MANHOLES MUST FIRST OBTAIN A SPEC/FlC PERM/T FROM TH£ DfPARTMENT lN ACCORDANCE WJrH PART V OF TH/S CHAPT£R AND MUST PROVlD£ lN TH£ PRELlM/NARY DESICN REPORT OR DRAW/NGS, SPECIfICATIONS, AND DESIGN DATA ACCOMPANYING THEIR PERMIi APPLICATION THE FOLLOWING /NFORMATION: (1) TECHNICAL OR £CONOMIC JUST/FICATION FOR EACH CONFL/CT MANHOLE. 2 A STATEM£NT IDENTIFYING T P () Hf ARTY RESPONSIBLE FOR MAINTAIN/NG EACH CONFL/CT MANHOL£. (3) ASSURANCf OF COMPLlANCE WITH rNE DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION R£QU/R£MENTS lN SUB- SUBPARAGRAPHS A. THROUGH 0. B£LOW. (A) EACH WAT£R MA1N PASS/NC THROUGH A CONFLICT MANHOL£ SHALL HAVE A FLEX/BL£, WArERTIGHT JOINT ON EACH S/Df OF THE MANHOLE TO ACCOMMODATE DIFFfRENTlAL SfTTlNC BETWfEN THE MAIN AND TH£ MANH�LE. (B1 W1THlN fACH CONFL/CT MANHOLf, THE WAT£R MA/N PASS/NG THROUGH THE MANHOLE SHALL BE /NSTALLED lN A WATERTIGHT CASING P/PE HAV/NG HlGH IMPACT STRENGTH (l.E., HAVING AN IMPACT STRENGTH (GE., HAVING AN IMPACT STRENCTH AT LEAST £QUAL TD THAT OF 0.25-1NCH-THICK DUCT/Lf IRON P1P£). (C) EACN CONFLICT MANHOLE SHALL HAVE AN ACCESS OP£N/NC, AND SHALL BE SIZED, TO ALLOW FOR EASY CLfAN/NC OF THE MANH�t£. (0) GRAT/NGS SHALL B£ INSTALLED AT ALL STORM SEWER !NL£TS UPSTREAM Of EACH CONFUCT MANHOLE TO PREVfNT LARG£ OBJECTS FROM ENT£RING TH£ MANHOLE. (4) S£PARATION BfTWEfN FIRE HYDRANT ORA/N5 AND SANITARY OR ST�RM SEWfRS, WASTEWATER OR STORMWATfR FDRCE MA/NS, R£CLAIMED WATER PIPEUNES, AND ON-S!T£ SfWAG£ TR£ATMfNr AND DISPOSAL SYST£MS. N£W OR RELOCAT£D F/RE HYDRANTS WITH UND£RCROUND DRAINS SHALL BE LOCATED SO THAT THE DRA/NS ARf AT LEAST THRf£ FE£T FROM ANY £XISTING OR PR�POSED STORM S£WER, STORMWATER FORCE MA/N, OR P/PEL/N£ CONVEY/NG RECLA/MfD WATER RfGUTATED UNDER PARl //i OF CHAPTfR 62-6f0, F.A.C., AT LEAST THR£E FEET, AND PRff£RABLY TfN ffET, FROM ANY fXlSTlNG OR PROPOS£D VACUUM-TYPE SANITARY SEW£R, AT LEAST S/X FEfT AND PR£FfRABLY TEN FEET, FROM ANY EX1STlNG OR PROPOS£D GRAVITY OR PRfSSURf -TYPf SANIrARY S£WER, WAST£WATER fORC£ MA/N, OR PlP£L/NE CONVfY/NG RECLA/MED WATER NOT R£GULATfD UNDfR PART !0 OF CHAPTER 62-610, F.A.C. AND AT LEAST TEN FEET fROM ANY £XIST/NG OR PItOPOS£D "ON-SITf SfWAGE TR£ATMENT AND DlSPOSAL SYSTEM" AS 0£FlNED lN SECTION 381.0065(2), F.S. AND RULf 64E-6.002, F.A.C. (5) fXCEPTIONS, WHERf /T /S NOr TfCHNICALLY FEASIBLE OR ECONOM/CALLY SENSlBLE TO COMPLY WIrN THE R£QUIREMENTS lN SUBS£CT/ON (1) OR (2) ABOV£, THE D£PARTMENT SHALL ALLOW EXCEPTIONS TO THESE REQUIRfMfNTS lF SUPPUES OF WATfR OR CONSTRUCTlON PERM/T APPL/CANTS PROVIDE TfCHNICAL OR ECONOM/C JUSTIFICATION FOR fACH fXCEPT/ON AND PROVIDE ALTERNAT/VE CONSTRUCT/ON fEATURES THAT AFFORD A SlMILAR LEVEL Of R£LIABILIrY AND PUBL/C HEALTH PROTECTION. ACCEPTABLE ALTERNATIVE CONSTRUCTION ffATURES, INCLUDING THf FOLLOWING. (A) WHERE AN UNDfRGROUND WATfR MA/N lS Bf/NG L4/D LESS �HAN TH£ REQU/RED M/NIMUM HOR/ZONTAL DISTANCE FROM ANOTH£R PIPELINE AND WHERf AN UNDERGROUND WATER MA/N /S CROSSING ANOTHER PIPfL/N£ AND JO/NTS lN THE WATER MAIN ARE BfING LOCATED LESS �HAN TH£ REQU/R£D MINIMUM DISTANCE FROM JOINTS lN THE OTH£R PlP£LINE. (1) USE Of PRfSSURE-RATED PIPE CONFORMING 1'0 TH£ AM£RICAN ri'ATER WORKS ASSOC/ATION STANDARDS INCORPORATED INTO RULE 62-555.330, F.A.C., FOR TN£ OTNER PIPfL/NE /F 1T !S A GRAVITY-OR, VACUUM- TYP£ PlP£UNE. (Z) l/S£ OF W£LDED, FUSED, OR OTHERW/SE RESTRAINED JOINTS FOR EITHER THE WATER MAIN OR TH£ OTH£R P/PfLIN£. (3) USE OF W,4T£RTIGHT CAS/NG PIPE OR CONCRETE ENCASEMENT AT LEAST FOUR /NCNfS THICK FOR £lTH£R TNE WATfR MAIN OR rNE OTHER P/PEL/NE. (B) WHERE AN UNDER6ROUND WATER MA/N !S BE/NG LAlO LESS TNAN THREE FEET HOR/ZONTALLY FROM ANOTHER PIPfLINE AND WHER£ AN UNDERGROUND WATER MAIN !S CROSSlNG ANOTHER P/PfL/NE AND lS Bf/NC LAID LESS THAN THE REQUIRED MINIMUM VfRTICAL DISTANCE FROM THE OTHER PIPELIN£. �OUALSTO THATEOF 0.25SNCH HlCK DUCT/LE�GRONPPPE)SORECO Cl�£T�ENCA EMENT�AT LEAST FOU �NCHESTlCK FOR THE WATER MAIN, AND �2QUALSTO THAT OF 0.25SNCH-7HlCK DUCT/LE�GIRONPPIPE) OR CONCI�£ E ENCASEM£NT�ATALfAST FOUR /NCNES TH/CK fOR THf OTHER PIPfLIN£ !F lT IS NEW AND !S CONVfYING WAST£WATfR OR R£CLA/M£D WATER. �RAD/NG & DRA/NA6E TEST/NGAND INSPECTIONREQUIREMENTS 1. ALL DELETERIOUS SUBSTANCE MAT£RIAL, (l.E. MUCK, PEAT, BUR/ED DEBR/S), IS TO BE EXCAVATED /N ACCORDANCE W/TH THESE PLANS, OR AS DIRECT£D BY THE OWN£R'S ENGiNE£R, OR OWNER S S�IL T£STING COMPANY. D£LETERIOUS MATfR/AL lS TO BE STOCKP/LED OR RfMOVED FROM TH£ S1TE AS D/RECTED BY THE OWN£R. £XCAVATED AREAS ARE TD B£ BACKFILL£D WlTH APPROVED MATfRIALS AND COMPACTED AS SHOWN ON TH£SE PLANS. 2. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PROTECT/NG £XCAVAT/NG AGA/NST COLLAPSE AND WILL PROV/DE BRACING, SHEETfNG, OR SHORING, AS NfCfSSARY. TR£NCHES SHALL B£ KEPT DRY WHfL£ PIPf AND APPURTENANC£S ARE BElNG PLAC£D. DEWATER/NG SHALL BE USED AS REQU/RED. 3. ALL STORM SEWER PIPE SHALL Bf RE/NFORCED CONCRETE CLASS /ll (ASTM C-76) UNLESS OTHERWlS£ NOT£D ON PL4NS. HAVE FA8R1C WRAPS P£R F.D.O.T. INDEX 280 4. PVC STORM PIPE, 12" AND SMALLER SNALL CONFORM TO AWWA C-900, CLASS 150 STANDARDS, UNLfSS OTHERWISE NOTED. 5. ALL ORAINAGE STRUCTURE GRArES AND COVERS WITHIN TRAFF/C AREAS SNALL Bf rRAFFIC RATED FOR HS-20 LOADlNGS. 6. MATER/ALS AND CONSTRUCT/ON METHODS FOR STREETS AND STORM ORA/NAGE CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE /N ACCORDANCf W/TH TNE LOCAL REGULATORY AGENCY. 7. ALL STORM STRUCTURES SHALL Bf GROUTfD TO TH£ INVERT ELEVATION(S) OF THE STORM PIPES(S). STORM PIPE SHALL BE SAW-CUT EVEN WITN THE STRUCTURE WALL(S). GROUT AROUND PIPES FOR WATER TIGNT AND SMODTH FlN/SH. 8. THE STORM DRAINAGE PlPING AND FILTRAT/ON SYSTEM SHALL BE SUBJECT TO A VISUAL INSPECrION BY TNE OWN£R S SO/LS fNGlN£ER PR/OR TO TH£ PLACEMENT OF BACKFILL. 9. rHE CONTRACTOR SHALL MA/NTA/N TH£ STORM DRA/NACE SYSTEMS UNTIL F/NAL ACCEPTANCE OF THE PROJECT. 10. THE CONTRACTOR lS RESPONSIBLf FOR COORO/NAT/NG TNE APPLICABLE TESrING W/TH THE SOILS ENGINEER. TESTS WILL B£ REQUIR£D PURSUANr WlTH THE TfSTlN6 SCHEDULE FOUND !N THE ENGINEERING CONSTRU Tl N AW C 0 OR INGS. UPON COMPLfTION DF THE WORK, THE SOlLS ENGlN£ER MUST SUBMlT CERT/FlCATIOIVS TO TNE OWNER S£N6/N£ER STAT/NG TNAT ALL REQUIREMENTS HAVE BEEN MfT. ii PAV/NG NOTES 1. PRIOR TO CONSTRUCrING CONCRErE PAVEM£NT, THE CONTRACTOR /S TO SUBMIT A PROPOSED JOINTING PATTERN TO THE OWNER S£NG/NEER FOR APPROVAL. 2. THE CONrRACTOR 1S TO PROV/DE A i/2° BIrUMlNOUS EXPANS/ON JOINT MArERIAL W/TH S£At£R, AT ABUTMENT OF CONCRET£ AND ANY STRUCTURE. 3. ALL PAVEAIENT MARK/NCS SHALL 8E MAD£ W/TH TRAFFIC PAJNT /N ACCORDANCE TO FDOT STANDARD SPEC/F/CAT/ONS 971- f2 PARKINC STALL STRIPING TO BE 4" WlDE PAINT£D WHIT£ STRIPES. 4. THE CONTRACTOR lS TO INSTALL EXTRA BAS£ MAT£RIAL WHEN THE O/STANC£ BETWE£N THE PAVEMENT £LEVATION AND THE TOP OF THE PIPE OR BELL 15 LESS THAN TWELVE (J2) INCNES. 5. STANDARD INDEXES REFER TO THE LATEST EDIrION OF FDOT "ROADWAY AND TRAFFIC DESIGN STANDAROS. " 6. THE CONSTRUCTlON OF ASPHALT PAVEMENT WITHIN THE PROPERTY MUST MEET THE FOLLOWING CR/TER/A: A. LIGHT DUTY.• - fj¢" ASPHALT rYPE PC-3 ON 6" BAS£ COMPACTfO TO 98Y. OF MAX. DENSlTY PER AASNTO T-180. SUBBAS£ TO BE COMPACT£D TO 98% MAX. DENSl7Y AND SrABIL/Z£D TO LBR 40. B. RESURFACE EXlSTINC ASPHALT "TO REMAIN" WlTH 1" ASPHALT TYPE PC-3. C. BASE LAYERS SHALL BE AS FOLLOW/NG: - CfRTIFIED CRUSHED CONCRETE PfR FDOT SPfCS. - CERTIFI£D UMEROCK AS PER FDOT SPECS - CERTIFI£0 SH£LL AS PER FDOT SPECS. 7. CONSTRUCTlON OF C�NCRETE PAV£MENT MUST MEET THE FOLLOW/NG CRITER/A: A. VEHICULAR USE AREA: - 6" TNICK, 3000 PS/ CONCRETE WITH 6X6X10 W.W.M. OV£R COMPACI'ED GROUND TO 98.Y OF MAX. DENSlTY. B. SlDEWALK - 4" THlCK, 30D0 PS/ CONCRETE OVER COMPACTED GROUND TO 95Y. OF MAX. DENSITY. NOTE TO CONTRACTOR 1. TNf CONTRACT�R SHALL PROVIDf CERTlF1E0 REC�RD DRAW- INCS, SIGNED AND SfAL£D BY A PROFESSiONAL LAND SURVEYOR. THE R£CORD DRAWINGS SHALL SHOW FlNAL CRAD£S FOR /NL£TS dc P/P£S W/TH TOP & BOTTOM fLEVAT/ONS, INVERTS, & LOCATIONS OF ALL UTILlT/fS lNCLUD/NC THE SANITARY SEWER AND WATER P/P/NG. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE TWO COP/ES OF THE CERT/F/ED RECORD DRAWINGS TO THE ENGIN£ER. THE AFOREMENTION£D RECORD DR4W/NGS SHALL BE SUFF/CIENT ENOUGH lN DfTAIL TO BE ACC£PTABLE BY AGENCIES HAV/NG JURISD/CTION. 2. TREE BARR/CADfS AND EROS/ON CONTROL MEASURES MUST REMA/N /NTACT THROUGH�UT CONSTRUCTiON. ENCROACHMENT /NT� OR FAILURE TO MA/NTA/N TNES£ BARRACADES WILL RESULT lN ENFORC£M£NT ACT/ON WH/CH MAY /NCLUDE C/lAT/�NS AND/OR P£RM/l REVOCAT/0N AS PROVlDED BY CNAPTER 166 OF THf P/NELL4S COUNTY LAND DEVELOPM£NT CODE. 3. PROVlDE A SUITABLE ON-5lrE WASH DOWN & CREATE A D/SPOSAL AREA. D/SPOSAL OF OF CONCR£TE SLURRY DIRECrLY OF /NDlRECTLY iNTO PUBLIC DRAlNAGE SYSTEMS lS .� V/OLATION OF THE /LUC/T DISCHARGE "PROVISION OF TH£ P/NELLAS COUNTY LAND D£VELOPMENT CODE. " S£C. 58-239 OF THE PINELLAS COUNTY AUTHOR/ZES PENALTY OF UP TO $f0,000.00 FOR EACH OFFENSE. CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIB/L/TYNOTE lT lS THE CONTRACrQR S RESPONSIBIL/TY TO P£RFORM A SURVEY (ACCOMPANIED BY THE ARCHITECT AND OWNER) OF TH£ £NT/RE PROJECT AREA lNCLUDING BUILD/NG(S) AND S/TE lMM£DIATfLY UPON OCCUPYING THE WORK AREA AND BY PHOTOGRAPHIC AND WRITTEN CORR£SPONDENCE DETAILlNG ANY ARfAS THAT ARE NOT IN A F/RST CLASS COND/T/ON (SURFACES THAT ARE UNBROK£N, NON-CRACKED, NON-RUSTING, WITHOUT CHIPS, WITHOUT SPLINTERS, �F 1'EXTURE MATCHING lTS SURROUNDING, WITH NEW APPEARING FIN/SHES, AND OP£RAT/NG AS OR/C/NALLY DES/GNED OR INTENOfD TO OPERATf) WHICH W/LL REMA/N !N TH£lR PRESENT CONDIT/ON AT rHE CONCLUS/ON OF TNE PROJECT. THE CONTRACTOR W/LL B£ RESPONSIBL£ fOR PROV/DING TNE OWNER A COMPLETE PROJ£Cr !N FIRST CLASS CONDlTION M£ETING /NDUSTRY W/DE STANDARDS lN QUAL/TY AND PERFORMANCE THROUGHOUT THE fNTIRE PROJECT AREA BU/LD/NG(S) AND S/T£ (RECARDLESS OF WHETH£R AN AREA /S SP£ClFlCALLY IDENTIF/ED WITHIN THE DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICArIONS OR NOT) UNLESS A PART/CULAR AREA HAS BEEN DESCRIB£D /N THE AFOREMENT/ON£0 PHOTOGRAPHS ANO WR/TT£N D£TA/LS. CONTRACTOR HAS TNE RESPONS/B!L/TY TO PROT£CT THE EX/STlNG BUlLDING(S) UT/L/T/£S AND 5/TE THROUGHOUT THE PROJECT T/Mf FRAME. SHOULD, DURlNG lH£ COURS£ OF THE WORK, ANY AREA �F TNE BUILD/NG(S) AND/OR UTILIT/ES AND/OR TH£ SlTE BECOM£ DAMAGED AND THATAREA WAS NOT SPEClFICALLY CALLfO �U1' TD BE A PART OF TH£ CONSTRUCrION, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPA/R AND/OR R£PL4CE TH£ DAMAGED AREA TO TH£ SAT/SFACT/ON OF iHE ARCHITECT AND OW£R AT N� ADDITIONAL COST TO THf OWNER. AS A PART OF rHES£ DOCUMENTS, A S/Tf SURV£Y AND/OR S1TE DATA, WHEN PROVIDED, AND ANY ADDlTIONAL INFORMAT/ON THAT MAY Bf PROV/DED !S FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY, TNE OWNER AND HlS ACENT ASSUME NO R£SPONS/BlLIRY FOR THE/R PREPARATION, C�MPLETENESS NOR ACCURAT£NESS AND THE CONTRACTOR IS FULLY RESPONSJBLf WHEN USING SA/D SOURC£S rHf CONTRACTOR SHOULD USE SUCH /NFORMAT/ON ONLY AS A CU/D£ TO TH£ SUSP£CTED LOCATlON �F UNDERGROUND SERVlCES, INCLUD/NG BUT IJ�T L/MiTED T0: WATER SUPPLY STORM 5£WER ELfCTRICAL POWER lRR/CATION L!N£S FIBER OPTIC CABLES FIRE ALARM SYST£M CABLES CONTROL WlRlNG SAN/TARY SEW£R NATURAL AND LP GAS L/NES RECLAlMED WATER SUPPLY T. V. CABL£S TELEPHONE CABLES SECUR/TY W/RING S/l£ UNDERCRDUND MECHAN/CAL SYSTEMS /NCLUD/NG iNSULATION lT WILL B£ THE CONTRACTOR'S RfSPONS/B/LITY TO D£TERM/NE rHE SPECIFIC LOCAT/ON �F THE UNDERGROUND SERVIC£S BY CAREFUL HAND EXCAVAT/ON ONLY UNLfSS OTH£R MEANS AR£ APPROYED BY ARCHIT£CT AND OWNER B£FORf BEGINNlNG THE WORK. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPLACE OR REPAIR, PfR SPEC/FlCATlONS, ANY AND ALL DAMAGED UNDERGROUND SfRVICES AS LISTED ABOVE AT NO ADD/TIONAL COST TO TN£ OWNfR. TRENCH EXCAVAT/ON SAFETYREQU/REMENTS 1. INCLUDE OSHA STANDARD 29 CFR, S£CTION 1926.650 SUBPART P, WHlCH lS NOW A PART OF L4 WS OF FLORIDA CHAPTER 90-96. 2. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVlDE WR/TTEN ASSURANCE OF COMPLIANCE WIrH THIS LAW. 3. A S£PARATf COSr ITEM /DENTJFY/NG THE COST OF CDMPL/ANCE. 4. A TRENCH SAfETY SYSTEM SHALL B£ DESIGNED BY THE CONTRACTOR, AND APPROVED BY THE £NG/Nf£R. 5. ALL RETENT/ON AREAS, STORM SEWER P/P/NG, STORM SEWER STRUCTURES, ETC. MUS1' Bf lN PL4C£ AS PART OF THE FIRST PHASE OF CONSTRUCTlON. lT !S rHE RESPONSIBIL/TY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO ACCOMMODAT£ POSIT/VE DRAINAGE THROUGHOUT C�NSrRUCT/ON TO AVO/D FLO�DlNG OF THE ADJACENi PROP£RTIES. ANY FLOOD(NG THAT MAY OCCUR DUE TO H/S WORK W/LL BE TNE SOLf R£SPONSlB1L/TY OF THE CONTRACrOR 6. THf USE OF ELECTRON/CALLY STOR£D DATA lS /NTENDED FOR /NFORMArIONAL PURP�S£S ONLY AND NOT TO BE USED FOR CONSTRUCTION. CONTRACTOR MUST UTIL/Z£ SIGNED AND SEALED O�CUMENTS FOR CONSTRUCT/ON. !; �m d� � q� �� a� �W ,� � ° � 'o� w��i R�a • � m = 00 V M � � � � � � � � d I- m � w • , O � � • � d eQ0 C C � r� c .� � Q y�� ',��`e�c � J � � d e � a�i ;c .� � R� ca �a Q �v�G C GCI +a+ ++ te Of �ft v J � 3 � •OE"r � � +�. O vayv I f ��U $ � F '�. � . y ,; ' ° �� ,� � ZU� � .' �� '. 9 , , c� ,U�°� s�.' 4 `ii''" � „� �v � r�� ym : �, ��. -7-F, .. ;�y,� ;+.r; a` 'n,' RA'M A. G E . P Df �. '� f. #47431 . ,. . ._ �� .f :: . . . . � ,,:.T� r � .. (�. . �� BOSSED WITHETH� S16N/NG ENGlNfER S SFAL� I J Project # 1102 Issue Date: 05/06/11 Revisions: No. Date Descri tion 0 � 0 � � 0 � � � � � . � � a � � � � � W a � W � � � J � � � �C� V �..� � W Q Q J a � Z Q � � M 1 ti M � � W M M Q � � w W a� Za C � a 0�0 J M t.� Nor�hside �i�t�ceacGs� .$e2ccfCed. �%stC. ❑ : 8 I h IP � I i � � ''� 4 I � � i' � t''_' 'l) `' i U� � �' � �. I;CI�; ��uC � 3:;� EX. BLDG. — 0' SETBACK SO6'38'31 "W � �� I-_ __ _-- ____ __ _ -- 2� CJRB & GUrP,_R 8G' `��--`� ---- �R/ud — =—:--�—__ _� ;�„ � ��1.� �� L A Y A Ii�: !',�� ( �,��(;,�� !��)�� I�f �� ` �,� � -} , ,, � ( J __ '�'' f-1 I�/ �; NOTE: SILT FENCES AND EROS/ON CONTROL MEASURES MUST BE lN PLACE PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION AND BE MAINTA/NED THROUGH THE PROJECT. "l ACKNOWLEDGE THE PL4CEMENT & LOCATION OF ALL MEASURES THIS PLAN REQUIRES TO CONTROL TURBIDITY & EROSION FOR THIS SITE. THIS PLAN SHALL BE MADE AVAILABLE TO SITE CONTRACTOR" DATE: (HDUSH GHOVAEE) �' �L'�`t' �' G1i7iER SlL i FENCE � �G �� k. �p . W � � � ,; . �f7�. rSc' � !�ti ��$k �l� � F~ �� aa '`"--., �� DEMOLITION NOTES � REMOVE EX, ASPHAL T& BASE L E GE N D REMOVE: 2� REMOVE EX. CONC. WALK/SLAB - �: : ' .r: :. .: 3� REMO�E EX. BUILDING ., coNCRErE �,°-.�s��'��'��a ��yf�':. 4❑ REMOVE EX. STAIRS ASPH & aASE 5� REMOI/E EX. A/C UNIT LLLLLL 6� REM01/E EX. GAS METERS BUILDINGS (BY CLEARWATER GAS) 7� REMOVE EX. COVERED BALCONY DEMOLlTION OF THE SITE INCLUDES THE REMOI/,4L/RELOCATION OF 8� REMOI/E EX. POWER LINE ALL EXISTING STRUCTURES WITHIN PROJECT AREA, PAVING AND BASE, UTILITY LINES (SANITARY 9� REMO�E EX. ALUMINUM FENCE SEWER, STORM PIPES, WATER LINES, POWER POLES, Ol/ERHEAD 10 RELOCATE EX. BIKE RACK AND UNDERGROUND POWER AND TELEPHONE CABLES, GAS LINES, TREES, SHRUBS, ETC.) AND lS 91 REMOVE EX. CURB, PAVERS NOT UMITED i0 WHAT S SHOWN. & BOLLARD 12. ALL CAVITl' & EXCAI/ATION RESULTING FROM REMO�AL OF TREES, SHRUBS, PIPES, INLETS, GREASE TR,4PS, SIGN, AND POLE BASE SHALL BE FILLED WITH APPROI/ED SUITABLE MATERIAL AND COMPACTED lN 12" LIFTS TO 959' OF MAX DENSITY. 13. OFF-SITE DISPOSAL OF STRUCTURES, UTILITIES AND CONSTRUCTION DEBRIS SHALL OCCUR lN SOUD WASTE DISPOSAL FAClLITIES APPROVED BY F. D. E. P. , AND PINELLAS COUNTY. 14. CONTRACTOR lS RESPONSIBLE FOR RELOCAi(ON OF ANY OVER HEAD WIRES AS REQUIRED FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF THIS PROJECT � 15° o_ to 3 18" c� MIN. � � III I8�11 i 12" + '�:�F:�'��i�,l�i? ��Hc� j� �\ ,.� � �: � H I L_ I'��u b�' �� /�� -,�g4� �,. ,;r�5��i�F�i�,Nl`JE STREET-��,�,T) (R/th+ WID?i-1 ��;RIFS) I� s' M�c.—�-I 2 "x4 " OR 2.5'DIAM. WOOD; 1.33LBS./FT. MIN. STEEL FlL TER FABRIC lN CONFORMANCE VYITH SEC. 985 F, D.O. T � SPECS. OR EQUAL EXIST. .. .� GROUND ' PRINCIPAL POST � POSITION, CANTED 20' TOWARD FLOW � FlL TER FABRIC SlL T FLOW — , '�� EXIST. GRDUND , SILT BARRIER DETAIL N.T.S. NOTE.• SILT FENCE SNALL NOT BE rRENCHEO lN WHERE AD✓ACENT r0 TREES DESIGNATED TO REMAIN. THE SILT FENCE MUST BE SECURED THROUGH THE � PLACEMENT OF FILL OVER THE LOWER LlP OF THE �\ THE LOWER LlP OF rHE BARRICADE. 10 � SCALE: 1 "=10' 0 5 10 20 � �a�° � t_�O_ G .ri (� �� ` 0 N .� {� A Cp ` ��i� � � �� . ��_ N eti � � �m •- � � y I - $ . � �°e 'c a�� y � �� 1 � J C � eo '� E •'►' � � � �E R� �a Q 4 � � � � '=' 3 � . p � y �O1 G c'ycg � \ '°°� �a��=� ti��i �.. � � � �D i 1, : ;, �,. � _t .� � �:i i �ii .. �� RA�A A.��GO�L', Ph.D., R,E; �#47431 COPlfS Oi TNfSt� NL�N�S �IR�.N9T YAUD UNL£SS EMBOSSfD W/TH THf SIGN/NG ENG/NEfRS SFiIL Project # ` 1102 . Issue Date: 05/06/11 Revisions: No. Date Descri tion � � � 0 0 0 � 0 0 � � � a � O — � � � 0 � W � �..� J ...� � a a a � Z a � � M � 0 M � � W M M a� � w W a� 0 Q a� � a 0�0 J M t,.� Northside �� s�. ��. ❑ I �� I k I� I T� . I �� L)`i ��l J�U�\\I �v �' ... ��i�� ! � �� 3a� �,., ,�_ 7��. �� , I -- � � 0 � � g � 5 6 � � IJ SO6'38'3� "yy — e'� ^) � � N � 0 w F � � -d- .1") � � N � LANDSCAPE NOTE: FLORIDA NATIVE LANDSCAPING WILL BE PROVIDED AND PER SECTION 3-1202.0 OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE, AN AUTOMATIC PERMANENT IRRIGATION SYSTEM WILL BE PROVIDED. 0.95 IMPERVIOS SURFACE RATIO SHALL NOT BE EXCEEDED. 0.05 PERVIOUS SURFACE RATIO SHALL BE PROVIDED ON SITE. EX. BRICK PA VERS 74.97'M ��n;1 _, ,5�'�'� ' ��-�-- .—. � ., , �, ----___-- Sp � ' ' � f�� `,,�. 6 26'30"W � ;�� a.�J,��, �,� _ '•!* ,�1 �'�: .�. I,� `�� . ,�� ,C '�=��e� 0+-;� �;4J I, � � , �, ;� ,'�;, �,. � �, ;- �,?. � , � -'--�-��- . ��•-' � � ;� > , � , �H,I� ' � �-�''.�i � ti � N . , . �� I _ ��'L/��R/E� . � - � �� .- ` �. EX. CONC. DRIVE ^ � � - TO REMAIN . �a� v�� ` �. - , — � �� ' �; _' y� u _ . Y �:. 35' � — � v'�,\r" � J �� I4. lU ' � M EOL ARD- NEW 12' X 35' LOADING ZONE W/12' X 35' INGRESS & EGRESS EASEMENT C1NF STURY C.�.�. �0�,41�EPCIAI El C;G. � 387 - � 39;i iGWESi fLt)GR c�EVATI�J��- 5.64' ,o:;;,� ;t,.oi? �:i;. —_`�- t> ��,�� 70' � � � �� v�rv:.:�etFj _ _-�_-----�_.__-;- � � CI -- -. _ .___ �_ L '��l;B � �U?T - �� _.____..._.-_-_=__ +_� - � �, ��:�1'?.��.1 ` �.`!iS i U'�� 0' BLDG. SETBACK 0 �- o; NEW DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE 6 " THICK CONC. PAD �lNISH TO MATCH BLDG. AND GATE TO MEET CITY OF CLWT. SPECS C;vt S7JRY '' �, �.. �, S. IL,`N __ � i EOF --�_75.17 M --____!_---.� — _ � -- ------- — ------ c -_----_ ._ __-- ---- c — TH�REE - 4 YARD R�►LL OUT CO►NTAINERS EX. ASPHALT TO REMA/N (RESURFACE) c LEGEND NEW ASPHALT NEW CONCRETE NEW BLDG. 0.55 CUk� I � J O ! . � � c. i � s —c , � �x. ,iv! �r � r�;r E�. �.2� � � I 1PdV cL. 0.33 � � I � i 1 N .--- �-- - I � BRICK CROSSWALK ,� � ; i� ��STERS __ , NEW 6 �° �� k�� . _ 12' CURB I i�: t;UTiER � 1, . . , _ 9 i 1� I . . ° 7 NEW ASPH. 9 , ' ` - ` �2.�' : � ____ -- -, , � � � , � _ � � ' s ., _ � � \ � r - � � ^ ��' � �' �. w � . ' . � � ' '1 .rv� yc` i 7 --�' 1 �� 3 '� 3y1 . `y.�' ��,,�-� �, � s :: -i � 1 , . � �y, -��.. t� `"J ��T,iz-3 � "�� l�- : n��`,5�� 3' i (� � i \ � ° ` ,, .�� ..��ti�� ,� � � � �;� �� " ` EEW .. s ; � ��.��a �°��„� : y,� � j�� `�`�-- .� � ,� '-� a ' � _ � �� , � �� N - ... ; -- F i.+ �.� .�-��'� .._. �"i��l�'�r'�° �a"t��h��'"r-� � �.."F 't � `` �� -.� � ;� ; -� -_ , �� -��,Y �� ;�,� �-�-�- „F„ CURB , ._ � ..., . '�� . . .r , r^ ,�L� �v.�;�.� . �.: ,��,�-'�y� �-�,"�,�,: v-s.,,� .} `°V"'��-� — . 3.1 Y E \ x_ ..:e. � ; : ,....., , . . �. ' ; � '� _...... , � � • _ � � � �j'+��„ -. v:-��. . _ ._ _ _ _ ��'S�-4�� ' r .:. � �,� � � LINE OA 3R0 � _ . UP - � � �� rt �' I � � FLR. AWN/NG , ; , - , j _i , . , 9 , - -�___ � � . � ,�- _ , _ , � _ ; � , _ _ , , -- ____, � ° , ^� ` i , _ , _ � � � �,; , �._ _._ � - ; , ; � � -- _ i --, _ , � �CONC4�W�LK , ; Lll�(E QF 2NQ -- - _ ^ �_�_. --; �. ,° .• . � ; _ _._. ��,�?._ ABOI�E ; _� ,, _ - _, _ � ; -� I , � � `:d. • . . '� � - , ; -- - _ _ ` 10� CLR. �ID. - -- _ _ , _ ; _ ; ._ , _ , . _ , � , _ , _SPA� � _; - - ! ` � i �— , , _ _, __ ` ; � , ; a ; _ - r.a __ : : - - , _ , �� -, __ _ ; ; ; _ _ -�-lC ..�IGN ; ; - - _ � � , . ; ; ; I , V3 W ' ' __ s � _ ' , - L it , � ; , _ _ ' _.. ❑ .._ O' C� ,' ' , , , _ C _ _ _ , ; ._ _� � ; , ; � ; � __�„ — , � FL� � � �ONK , -- ; ; _ .; > . __ - . __ I � -. __ _ � � ' W-la!�'EL _ 5T0/� _ ; , - , __ ,' _ , _. , _ ,. W ` i , _' � � � -_ � �, � � _ , �� i , . I " _, u�_; __ _. (�TYP) ; ' _ . : � - , _- � � ,� ; _ , W , : ; � -� FLR. D HANG ; � LINE OF 2ND o ; , ___ , __ ; __ - � VER � ,, ; _ --- _ __ _ ; _ , _ _ � : __ , _ , _ � , _. , : , _ --' ; o o - - _. a: __ -. i 1 : . , f � , . � -- _ _ , i � - , _� ; _ NEW;2 - STaRY�LDG -_, - � __ , � � � ; � , � _ , __ , --- -- __ , -,� t � " ' ' �-{-�OO��P DECK - - _ � _ � : ___ , ; . _ , ; , __ � ,_ � � ; -_. __ , _ , ; , , - m, : - � ; ; ,� ; _ , _.. , - _ ._� _� � � � _ a�� , , _ � 2' � � FL. L. 5.4 <, " I � � � __ -- �_. : ��, � __ - , , , ._ ' � f 3 ~-1 , � ; : __ -_- ' `t — � � `" x , _ , , _ ; ; II � � _ . _ � ; -, _ .__ : , _ _ , - __ , � ,! ___ ,�, I f— ; - ..__ , FLR HANG LINE OF ZND _ � , _. - - . � - - � - -- _ r ' � , � ; ; __ ; � . ! . ; _ __ � ; _ - i _ , __ _. ; -- _ - ____ _ . , � __ � , , _ . ; , `� _, � ' '; _. . i _ ` � _ PROP05€D __ ' � ; ; ,, _... _ . , ' - ' , � � __' �' ' ......... ' . ; " . ' ."'_ - , , � �� ._ � : . ; ...' � ' I � __' _._.._ r .._ � . ... I � �l� � ' � � $TARBUCKS � ELEVATOR _ _: ; _ _ , ; - � _ _ _ . _' �,546 S.F: _, __ ' ; ; _ _PROPOSED ; ; � , _ , ; ; __ _ � , - - ._ _. ' o ; RETp�IL ._ _+ _' . _ ; - __ � . , , - , ; _ - '1,8�9 S.F. ' ---- - - , � + � _ , - _ _. , I , , , , ; ___ -_ __ ; . ; -- _ , � I , � � , _ ; - ;� _ _o ; , a�� M STARBUCKS _ _ ; , ,;, _ , _ ' ___ - — _ � `` PATIO o.;o' � , _ ; . ._. ` ._ _ � Vl�IBILQ � -SIGHT' ; , � � : �TY rRlA��L�- -- ' � L/NE OF 2ND � �_ - - i �� , , � �.: , ' ` ' 2, ��FLR. �BALCONY « � , � -.__. - �' °' � LlM _ � ; , ,, _ _.___ ' ,. 0 �o A � � � Q � �' �, E OF �, . , __ _ 3/�D ; ; ; - ; % �, w k: - , �� = . , ��R A N/N � I �j . �, f ` , � ; _ . .. i - - �X. STU,RM ,i9N, X � ., _ I �K � �. � .. � � -- ,; ; , , �� c .� � � ` � UP � � � �, _ � � R CKB � � ; , . � -_ . � --�__ - ' I � �M� I < � � .�,, . L _ , -�., _ � ... � ' _- .. _ . --�1� . — -� , � .• . :.. . ..._. � . .,: ° /.- � - - - b � ____,_ �''" "'��.. LINE OF STAIR - - - - � ' °p ° � _ �� 74 9�' - (2N0 FLR - 3RD �``� M ` 31' � L/NE ' M `� OF 2N0 FLR. L -- _ N06 28'20"E �►� `r ° P FLR.) OVERHANG 'co,vc��Fj - - - - `� _ � „ p��' �� ,� ,o„�-� ., � L/NE OF ZND - �----- cAS t;H; VE -- _ J'j L/NE �F 3RD � --�: � _ . ---__ `- -� "--` � �_' -- -�-`— __ `�_`__��-� —_: =--_ ----�-----_ `�� Ihf __- - °-_�_,� -_ R `� _---__-; �-_ 'i �'� �1 r `-- —_-= - , 1�. �!�� Y a �� ,�� .�- ==-=_ {�''��A��'D,�,i a,Y ��(�'�(-=tif�,� ��u- ��; � � � � L f� �� (�:iPi-iqi j) FLR. BALCONY � ��-FLR. OVERHAN _--_�_ _---- rntish ��h � Lbe^_� .� L//VE OF 2N0 `� � --_ ---�---- Carv �°%9" FLR BA L CONY M j/ ---------__ `- � � L/NE OF 2N0 f'� - - /' � `� / ; <' cuFa �-- - - _ --_ -`- OVERy � i..` '° '" ° ._ ,,� I� iG�Q �l � %. ' �.` G'�l T�:R �j - _�_ ``'—�=�� ANG �� H {'y. °1 rr ,.� � � � �{Vr.,�. i "'---- '�_ --�.._. � � �'�. ~ '"�i�'� r� P t �,�� ,�5 0 a.6B' r_�k8 LAfVDS'CAP��, MEUIra� Ex. cu,4� �n�� r - T�?P EL. 4.59 lAJV EL. 0. ?5 (ASPHqI �) �_�-�`' -- �—�_ �— �_�` � �R�cK ckr��sw�� ,�. Ff-�, .� �� tJ � f 1� i� � � t \� 1 \ ' 1 � S ' ! i i` ' \� � \ '51 ' t`J 1� Iw 1 I i rr 1; �� L,4NDSCAPED MEDiP,N G,,�, ��k� � �� ,d°t, � � 4" �UP.D� , ,� ` �1 � J J CJ z z z � �- �� . �w s � o� �_ ,=°Q � � ;ASPH;�L.T.j �::�E ,l,R��'�,TEi� E > iA�1�_ R��,J 6�� +j P�� !�'�. R I r� f�� r�� E S TR E (R,/"�V� WIDTH VAF NOTES: 1. ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACE SHALL HAVE A VERTICAL CLEAR HEIGHT OF 8' - 2" PER FLORIDA BUILDING CODE CHAPTER 1 1, SECTION 1 1-4.6.5 SCALE: 1 "=10' 10 0 5 10 20 • �� ►� �;� °�: � � �f y � W O tj G LL � B) �' ��a � � � ' a °_ N e`�a �� m � m •• 5~ H ' - $ . `� V � '� a�� d h�� o � �� m co {� E •=' � �ea m�„Q a e � o � �3� . � � y .� �cyci ,+�� 4�� : 4 F � � � lw � '��. �� 6��_�� 3 _ ..,,'� ��' M �� :� : �� ' �� : � ti ; ` � � � m:: � � - � �, � . R�►�lil � �Gc?�L,-Ph D., P.Ef i�47431 COPIES, Uf THESf �UN�S �IRE�MDI:VAUD UN/fSS , £MBOSS£D 'WITH TH£ S/GNfNF ENG/NEER S 5£AG Project # � 1102 Issue Date: 05/06/11 Revisions: No. Date Descri tion 0 0 0 � 0 � � 0 0 � a � a W H - N CS � — � a � � � J � a a � a 0 z a � � M . 00 M � � � W M M a� � w � aW °a Q � � 0�0 J M t� Nor�hsiae ��. s�. ��. ❑ I� f I� ��, � �- � g � ° s � � IV S.ft � r , 1'1 L._. _.. �I� � � 1 IF� �� ., E?. ��- I�4I�l G�GG #,� 395 SO6'38'31 "W NOTES: 1. WATER MAINS ARE DEEP AND WET AND WILL REQUIRE DEWATERING AND A TRENCH BOX AS REQUIRED TO MEET ALL APPLICABLE CODES AND STATUTES. SEPARATE PERMIT AND INSPECTIONS REQUIRED FOR TRENCHING BY CLEARWATER FIRE DEPARTEMENT. 2. DEVELOPER/CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE TO REMOVE OR RELOCATE ANY WATER METERS THAT REQUIRE RELOCATION AS A PART OF THIS DEVELOPMENT INCLUDING RECLAIMED WATER METERS. 3. WATER METERS SHALL NOT BE LOCATED WITHIN IMPERVIOUS AREAS. 4. PURSUANT TO CDC SECTION 3-912, FOR DEVELOPMENT THAT DOES NOT INVOLVE A SUBDIVISION, ALL UTILITIES, INCLUDING INDIVIDUAL DISTRIBUTION LINES, MUST BE INSTALLED UNDERGROUND UNLESS SUCH UNDERGROUNDING IS NOT PRACTICAL. 5. ALL UTILITIES LINES APPARATUSES SHALL BE INSTALLED 5' AWAY FROM ANY EXISTING PALM TREES AND OUTSIDE OF ANY OVRHANG. EX. BRICK PA VERS CQ� l, J �>> �n„��J �� C:UIiB & GUTiER , � ---_._ -�--_ _ � 0' ,��/G,d -----=_ --_ 4`--=�. j I�,�AI��j�f��h ��, ,t �. , �� b'� '�' � (rVi,�ll��,� ,� � +�(��'�,' - �;�� _�� C ✓, ti1i� --_. ��1' ;� T� , i ��; I �� r;�;�� T�RY U.�,�', <' curra � c�r��R NEW 4" CONC. WALK TO �� l MATCH EX. TEXTURE � �``� C-Y r"'! IRG +Af� Fi `� � ��— =�x. �- f;�. k'f6 LEGEND EXIST. ELEVATION NEW ELEVATION ��' + 5.6 EXIST. STORM SEWER .. , �� : � '- ��_ ,-. NEW STORM SEWER � � � � � EXIST. SAN. SEWER - - � � �� -� � �� = NEW SAN. SEWER � ■ � ■ � EXIST. WATER SERVICE � � NEW WATER SERVICE �� NEW INLET � NEW SAN. MANHOLE • C.O. NEW CLEAN—OUT(C.O.) �❑ TEMP. SILT BARRIER POINT OF CONNECTION �� OF NEW UTILITY TO EXIST. FLOW ARROW �"`'� SWALE ARROW �� T.B.O. TEMPORARY BLOW—OFF T.&V. TAP AND VALVE M METER F.H.A. FIRE HYDRANT ASSEMBLY F.D.C. FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTION , t;�F ,'-;R1��Jf;TLr �E,��N % �, , *��i-,�,iE F'O��i� i�0 F��U�1D�IC�OUT 1��: ��I`��7F;ir,f��JE STR�ET-P�,� i ) (RJ'�+ �9UTH VhRIES) 10 � SCALE: 1 "=10' 0 5 10 20 . � � ;, a, � �o ev�, ��'�W � ��o► - �� • ��t � N �gf �G N m •• � ,� � y ' - $ vV � ._ _�p� J 1� G .� L� y ;� y � � � � � J C � a '`t� E •=' '_�� Q �� -`Oa O0 3 � �d � c�c'�8 i ,,- :;,c , . , ♦ s ��,Ys�R � �. . � �a `_ � I . ° S•� •I � ��ti V.� � �.� LU� � -� . .m (� � • f✓� �.� � � r ` 51J � � M " ,� � , f. . - �:. �'' . � t � �m �. y. 3 `� W .� E , a ` RAM �,; GOEL; Ph`d �.I�. . #�7431-_ COPIES Of TNFSE.PWN$ ARf NOT VALID UNLf55 fN8055ED W/TN �H£ S/GN/NG ENG/NffR 5' SEAi ' Project # � ` 1102 Issue Date: 05/06/11 Revisions: No. Date Descri tion 0 0 � � 0 0 0 0 � � � � a � W � � � J - H � .. � � — 0 a � � V J J W a a J a 0 Z a � � M � O~O M ti co � W M Q � � w W a� °a Q � � Q M t� Nor�hsibe ��.�. s�. ��. a ❑ � � � � nI4 ` � II PLACE CONC. SLAB/WALK 4" BELOW FLOOR NEw BLDG. ELEV. EXCEPT AT ROOF DRAIN ASPHALT � 1/4" NEW BLDG. DOaRS REMAIN FLUSH. ;;� NEW BLDG. �� PER FT. MIN. � � FIN. GROUND ° i�` t,-�, n` EXCEPT AS NOTED EXPANSION JOINT 'n•i i � �. � �...-�;,�_ � � � 5� B DGGT OU 3D BE OW D _�.�i,�,1C �,`_; ��Q'l, � o�iC?(��t pr, i�_.��—, -t- FIN. FL. • UTILIIY (i.e. SANITARY � \ , 4_ SLOPE AT 1/4" e1 , FIN. FLOOR ELEVATION SEWER, WATER SERVICE, PLACE SOD ��Z�� PER FOOT BELOW PAVEMENT _i�li._!il�=.(i��;Ii��If�,=�� =}I��l�=�^4=- °�e ' 1 . FIRE LINE OR STORM ,° BC SOD ~ LIMEROCK BASE FIN. FL. ` 10:11 MAX. SLOPE °1—°°—'� �°�_ '� DRAIN BY SITE CONTRACTOR a � i > FIN. FL. MAX. SLOPE 4:1 F.D.O.T. CERTIFIED -�= SOD �,\ To s' FROM B��c. ° . FIN. GRADE PRIOR COMPACTED TO ° • _ ". -. MIN. SLOPE 2% NEW ASPHALT 98% MAX. DENSITY lil-ill�_Iiii_ii�l � ��, �� Iil IIII_!Ili=lill_'� a AND BASE TO SODDING ; = iNI_�!i;=1B1=11 ! -� a NOT'ES: -. UTILITY WITHIN 5� oF e�oc. __ ,�,U�— POSITIVE DRAINAGE 6�� SUBBASE , 1. PI�OVIDE 5�x5�X4� � . 8Y PLUMBWG CONTRACTOR, a _��j�n��1�1/n\l�jj�n��t�� COMPACTED TO "� THICK CONC. SLAB CONTRACOTORCUNLESSYOTHERWISE 9H% MAX. DENSITY � ALIL EMERGENCY EXITS. ��+�=��L°lul_IIll,i�i�-��_illi=1111 COORDINATED BY THE G.C. (SEE PAVING NOTES ON C1.2) 2. CONFORM TO ABOVE COMPACTED GROUND DETAIIL FOR PLACING WALKS AT THE BLDGS. UTILITY CONNECTION AT ALL BUILDINGS GROUND PREPARATION PLACEMENT OF PARKING & DRIVEWAY SECTION PLACEMENT OF CONCRETE N.T.S. AT ALL BUILDINGS SOD AT PAVEMENT ".T.S. SLAB AT ALL BUILDINGS ".T.S. ".T.S. N.T.S. GRADE � \ ��\ M� WATER MAIN OR MEDIUM BROOM STORM DRAIN FINISH CONC. WALK FINISH GRADE TO 18" MIN. VERT+CAL CLEARANCE 1�� BELOW EDGE OF WALK P/L SEE PLAN SAN. SEWER VARIES (SEE PLAN� � SHO DER PLACE 50D 1/2" 2"' RADIUS GRADE � SLOPE 1/4'� PER FOOT�( SOD BELOW PAVEMENT �J - Z io' \ to' 4 �'� ' " -' =III -III FIN. GRADE PRIOR I � VERTICAL CURB cO — NEW ASPHALT � � � Iil� "i4'�II � TO SODDING WATER MAIN OR AND BASE STORM DRAIN D.I.P. IS USED IN PLACE OF P.V.C. POSITIVE DRAINAGE 4:1 MAX PAVING FoR a MiN. oF �o� EACH WAY COMPACTED FILL OR MEET EX. ( > I I I— 6'� 2' LEVEL �, II + FROM C� OF WATER MAIN WHEN GRADE SHOULDER 'ti-► COMPACTED FILL � � I I I II I B�SE THE VERTICAL CLEARANCE l�ETWEEN � �a�„�� L � UNDISTURBED SOIL ``"` '�i��v��y��n" �` OR UNDISTURBED = —� WATER dc SEWER MAINS IS 18' OR LESS. � Z � � g 18" OR LESS VERTICAL CL. I M� SOD � -1111_lf IIJIII 1111=111FIIII=IIN wATER MAw � � � �_If'�— NOTE: C O M P A C T E D G R O U N D soi� I � � i�• ':. —,— COMPACTED WtiEt�I��R�LK IS PROVIDE 1/4�� -� � � � i � SUBBASE + TO B M(S�ED &/OR CONTROL JOINTS � 11_ 3,�00 PSI — - I I I'� I I NOJTE: 10' MIN. NEW 51DEWALK IS TO CONCRETE II ~ � 4�O.C., 5' O.C., ' �I PfROVIDE 1�4� P.V.C. OR V.C.P. HORIZONTAL CLEARANCE I BE ADDED, IT IS TO I- 8-II I1I CfJNTROL JOINTS Sat�. SEwER GRaVItt MwN NOTE: + BE REMOVED TO THE 8' O.C., OR 12' O.C. C�P 4'O.C., 5' O.C., CONCRETE ENCASEMENT OF STORM SEwER NEAREST EXPANSION & 1/2" BITUMINOUS SANITARY SEWER GRAVITY OR SAN. SEWER JOINT. EXPANSION JOINTS 8" O.C., OR 12' O.C. MAIN IS NOT PERMITTED. GRavirr Ma,iN � 40' �.C. FOR 4� GROUND TRANSITION 8c 1/2" BITUMIN�US SIDEWALKS, 50' O.C. EXPANSION JOINTS VERTICAL CLEARANCE HORIZONTAL CLEARANCE FOR 5' OR GREATER. � 40' O.C. FOR 4� AT THE PROPERTY LINE SIDEWALKS, 50' �.C. FOR 5� OR GREATER. CONCRETE WIALK DETAIL ".T.S. WATE R MAI N& SAN ITARY N.T.S. TYPE "D" CURB SEWER CLEARANCES N.T.S. N.T.S. . (�� V � � . � ' - . . � ,��wo� �"d co�, ��CW � � �i �� d ��v �� N @5 ��r � �'�w d� _� � d m w 0 y M 4 t0 � �� r� e �� a•� w N � y� � � �iJ �:� � ,� Q � � R � R '� Q a v � C O = d w V � a' 3 : �a�� VCyV LM" � t.%" _ . . . . •• =' ' ' � -�� .. �' � ' 2�t 1�1 i_)' : �j c� - ,:?.; �� L�� t r ' k i .�,. , � . % C3 C�'I f } `; u�'! � � a : s � . ; � . ` ,�� I �. _. ✓� .� ' • � .. r �•�- �F '� � � W . ►' �^.�", ' '. , . � , r-� : - RAMA.��OEL; PIf.D.;_P E.'#47431 COPIfS.Of THESE PIANS ARf'NOT'YAUD UNLfSS fNBOSS�O WtlN THE $1GNlNC EASCIN£ERS SFAL Project # 1102 Issue Date: 05/06/11 Revisions: No. Date Descri tion � 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 � �/ V � 0 Q � � � W � - N J — � � � J � a a a 0 Z a � � M � ti M � � W M M Q —J �� a� aW �a a� �Q L!'i W M CJ.1 NO�hsiae S.�gr,�ce�rr,.rg. se�tcea, �I.�c. ❑ PARKING ANALYSIS FOR HOOTERS AT CLEARWATER BEACH 385 MANDALAY AVENUE CLEARWATER BEACH, FLORIDA PREPARED FOR: 387-391 MANDALAY AVE, LLC �. . . . . . • _• _ • GULF COAST CONSULTING, INC. REVISED JULY 2011 PROJECT # 11-018 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION II. METHODOLOGY III. EXISTING CONDITIONS ANALYSIS IV. FUTURE CONDITIONS WITH REDEVELOPMENT V. CONCLUSION � � Robert C. Per li i, AICP/PTP AICP # 9023 / PTP #133 I. INTRODUCTION The 0.19 acre proj ect site is located at 3 85 Mandalay Avenue and currently contains a ground floor retail shop and six apartments on the second floor. The site is proposed to be redeveloped as a mixed use project containing a 8,142 square foot two story + rooftop deck Hooters restaurant, a 1,921 square foot ground floor Starbucks, and a 1,819 square foot specialty retail store (Crocs). The site is located on the east side of Mandalay Avenue between the roundabout and Papaya Street on Clearwater Beach (See Figure 1). The site is located in the Tourist (T) zoning district, and per Section 2-802 of the Community Development Code has a minimum parking requirement of 7-15 parking spaces per 1,000 square feet of restaurant space, and 4-5 spaces per 1,000 square feet of retail space. According to strict interpretation of the code, the proposed development would require between 77-160 parking spaces (7-9 spaces for the retail space and 70 — 151 spaces for the restaurants. The proposed site plan shows a total of three (3) spaces being provided on-site. Per Section 3-1405 "Shared Parking" of the Community Development Code the peak shared parking requirement is 76-159 spaces between 6PM and Midnight on weekdays as shown below: SHARED PARKING DEMAND (LOW) Land Use Weekday Weekday Weekday Weekend Weekend 12 - 6 AM 9AM - 4PM 6PM - 12 9AM - 4PM 6- 12 PM Mid Retail 5% (0) 70% (5) 90% (6) 100% (7) 70% (5) Restaurant 10% (7) 50% (35) 100% (70) 50% (35) 100% (70) Total 7 40 76 42 75 SHARED PARKING DEMAND (HIGH) Land Use Weekday Weekday Weekday Weekend Weekend 12 - 6 AM 9AM - 4PM 6PM - 12 9AM - 4PM 6- 12 PM Mid Retail 5% (0) 70% (6) 90% (8) 100% (9) 70% (6) Restaurant 10% (15) 50% (76) 100% (151) 50% (76) 100% (151) Total 15 82 159 85 157 The code provides for reducing the required number of parking spaces to recognize the special situations that exist on Clearwater Beach. Section 2-802 of the Community Development Code allows a reduction in parking if the property will require fewer parking spaces per floor axea than otherwise required or adequa.te parking is available through existing or planned and committed parking facilities within 1,000 feet of the property. City of Clearwater staff has recognized the retail establishments located on Clearwater Beach, in close proximity to municipal parking lots, on-street parking spaces, nearby hotels/motels and residential condominiums within walking distance, have a great potential for "walk-up" customers The Jolly Trolley also stops near the site and there are bicycle racks near the site. Staff also recognizes the available public parking in nearby lots serves two functions, one to serve beachgoers, and two to provide paxking for beach related businesses. This parking analysis was prepared to determine the availability of parking spaces. II. METHODOLOGY Prior to conducting this analysis a methodology was established with the City of Clearwater staff. It was agreed GCC would obtain hours of operation and employee shift data from each establishment. Employee parking demand was based on 80% of employees requiring a parking space and 20% arriving by other modes of transportation as has been customary for previous parking studies on Clearwater Beach. The parking space requirement for customers was evaluated using a 50% factor based on customer surveys conducted at Surf Style/Britts for a previous parking study. The previous study confirmed 50% of the customers parking in local hotels and condominium lots, and 50% parked in public beach lots or used on-site parking spaces. These factors are shown in Table l. These factors were used in preparing a"time-of-day" matrix which is shown in Table 2. It was agreed GCC would conduct a parking accumulation study on a Friday between 11AM and 2 PM (lunch) and 6 PM to 10 PM, and Saturday between 10 AM and 4 PM and 6 PM — 10 PM. The study area included on-street parking along Mandalay Avenue between the Hilton south driveway and San Marco Street, on-street paxking on Papaya Street, Municipal Lot #31, Municipal Lot # 34, Municipal Lot # 35, Municipal Lot #43 and the Hyatt Aqualea parking garage which contains public parking. These areas include a total of 1,040 parking spaces. TABLE 1- HOOTERS AT CLEARWATER BEACH - PARKING DEMAND PARAMETERS SPACES REQUIRED ASSUMPTIONS: EMPLOYEE PARKING IS LIMITED TO 80% OF EMPLOYEES USING A CAR BASED ON CLEARWATER EXPECTATIONS RESTAURANT CUSTOMERS PARKING BASED ON CODE REQUIREMENT OF 15 SPACES/1000 SF FOR RESTAURANT RETAIL CUSTOMERS PARKING BASED ON CODE REQUIREMENT OF 5 SPACES / 1000 SF OF RETAIL AREA THIS HAS A TOTAL DEMAND OF 122 SPACES FOR HOOTERS A TOTAL DEMAND OF 29 SPACES FOR STARBUCKS A TOTAL DEMAND OF 9 SPACES FOR RETAIL SPACE TABLE 2- TIME OF DAY PARKING DEMAND HOOTERS HOOTERS STARBUCKS STARBUCKS STARBUCKS RETAIL RETAIL HOOTERS STARBUCKS RETAIL TOTAL TIME PERIOD SHIFT A SHIFT B SHIFT A SHIFT B SHIFT C SHIFT A SHIFT B CUSTOMERS CUSTOMERS CUSTOMERS DEMAND 12 MID-1 AM 8 S 1AM-2AM � 2AM-3AM � 3AM-4AM � 4AM-5AM 4 4 5AM-6AM 4 75 19 6AM-7AM 4 15 19 7AM-8AM 4 4 15 23 SAM-9AM 4 4 2 75 25 9AM-10AM 4 4 2 75 5 30 10 AM - 11 AM 6 4 4 2 15 5 36 11 AM - 12 NOON 6 4 4 2 61 15 5 97 12 NOON - 1 PM 6 4 2 2 61 15 5 95 1 PM-2PM 6 4 4 2 2 61 15 5 99 2PM-3PM 6 4 4 2 2 61 15 5 99 3 PM - 4 PM 6 4 4 2 2 61 15 5 99 4 PM - 5 PM 6 8 4 4 2 61 15 5 105 5PM-6PM 6 8 4 2 61 15 5 101 6PM-7PM 8 4 2 61 15 5 95 7 PM -8 PM 8 4 2 67 15 5 95 8 PM - 9 PM 8 4 2 67 15 5 95 9PM-10PM 8 4 2 61 75 10PM-11 PM 8 4 61 73 11 PM - 12 MID 8 4 61 73 III. EXISTING CONDITIONS ANALYSIS Existing conditions were established by conducting parking lot counts between the hours of 6:00 PM and 10:00 PM on Friday May 20, 201 l, and Saturday May 21 2011 between 10:00 AM and 4:00 PM and 6:00 PM and 10:00 PM. Weather conditions were typical for late May with a high temperature of 90 degrees and lows of 78 degrees. No rain was encountered at any time during the study. The aforementioned parking areas were checked on the hour for the number of spaces that were occupied. The number of occupied spaces was noted and an hourly accumulated total was obtained for each specific parking area and the whole study area. The main parking facilities serving the southern part of the Mandalay Avenue business district are two municipal lots and on-street parking. Municipal Lot #31 contains 152 parking spaces, Municipal lot # 34 contains 23 metered spaces plus 1 handicapped space and is located south of Papaya Street. Municipal lot # 35 contains 25 metered parking spaces plus 1 handicapped space and is located south of the CVS, Municipal Lot #43 contains 41 metered spaces and is located both east and west of East Shore Drive, and Municipal Lot #63 is located between Poinsettia Avenue and East Shore Drive and contains 33 spaces + 2 handicapped spaces. Mandalay Avenue between the Hilton main entrance and San Marco Street contains 26 metered on-street parallel parking spaces and Papaya Street contains 7 metered parking spaces. Frida�Mav 20, 2011 On Friday paxking demand did not vary significantly throughout the study period with a low of 305 occupied spaces (29%) at 11:00 AM to a peak demand of 570 occupied spaces (55%) at 8:00 PM. As such, there were a minimum of 474 unused spaces in the study area throughout the study period. Closer analysis shows Municipal Lot # 31 and the on-street spaces on Papaya Street were almost always full, Municipal Lots #34, #35 and #43 and Mandalay Avenue spaces were underutilized throughout the mid-day hours but nearly fully occupied through the evening. The Hyatt garage was underutilized throughout the mid-day and evening study hours. Table 3 provides an hourly tabulation and Figure 2 provides a graph of hourly parking space occupancy. Saturdav May 21, 2011 On Saturday parking demand varied significantly throughout the day from a low of 282 occupied spaces (27%) at 10:00 AM to a peak demand of 744 occupied spaces (72%) at 4:00 PM. As such, there were a minimum of 296 unused spaces throughout the day. Again a closer analysis shows Municipal Lot # 31 and the on- street spaces on Papaya Street were almost always full. However on Saturday Municipal Lots #34, #35 and #43 and Mandalay Avenue spaces were heavily used 0 N N } Q M � wa m9 az f LL �f��is� W aaaaaaa ��0000000 � o 0 0 0 0 0� �.-N�(V <C'rio � � � (��l F � � O � � J J J a�� vaa Z U U 7 Z Z Z � � N Z 2 W W W U U U Q Q Q aaa (/1 (q N O O � W W W aaa odadaQ U U U �Z �Z OZ S 2 2 m.- � N N N >?� U U U Z Z Z 1000 900 800 700 � v 600 a a � W 500 a � v 400 c� 0 300 200 100 0 FIGURE 2- FRIDAY MAY 20, 2011 11AM 12:00 PM 1:00 PM 2:00 PM 6:00 PM 7:00 PM 8:00 PM 9:00 PM TIME OF DAY --� Series1 0 N i' a f r a w°� J � m f f N �p o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o g o 0 0 0 0 � o � iv � iJ i+i e in i� io 6i � c� n Fit# �00 a�� vaa Z U U ] Z Z Z � � — Z 2 N _ _ W W W U U U 6QQ aaa fn N f/1 0 O O wWW aaa ¢ndd U U U �Z OZ OZ 2 2 2 e � � f/1 N fq W W W � O O U U cJJ 2 Z Z 1000 900 800 700 N cWj 600 a a � W 500 a � v 400 O 300 200 100 0 FIGURE 3- SATURDAY MAY 21, 2011 10:00 AM 11:00 AM 12:00 PM 1:00 PM 2:00 PM 3:00 PM 4:00 PM 6:00 PM 7:00 PM 8:00 PM 9:00 PM TIME OF DAY � Series1 throughout the mid-day hours and occupied through the evening. The Hyatt garage was underutilized throughout the mid-day and evening study hours. Table 4 provides an hourly tabulation and Figure 3 provides a graph of hourly parking space occupancy. IV. FUTURE CONDITIONS WITH REDEVELOPMENT The proposed redevelopment as a mixed-use project would result in only 3 on-site parking spaces and must obviously rely on available public parking spaces in the area. The redevelopment would require between 76 and 159 parking spaces according to strict interpretation of section 3-1405 of the code. A detailed hourly analysis was completed based on the expected operating characteristics of the restaurants and retail space. As shown in Table 2, employee plus customer parking, including shift overlaps, would result in a peak parking space demand of 105 spaces at 4 PM. Parking demand would vary throughout the day/night, being near 100 spaces for the period of 11 AM — 9 PM. In reviewing the available spaces from Table 3 and Table 4, and assuming the worst case, a minimum of 296 parking spaces are available to satisfy any demand therefore there is adequate parking available to support the proposed redevelopment. V. CONCLUSION This an�alysis was conducted in accordance with a specific methodology establisYied with City of Clearwater staff. This analysis demonstrates of the 1,040 total parking spaces included in the study area, a maximum of 744 were occupied during any hour of the study period and a minimum of 296 spaces were available. A detailed analysis of time of day variations demonstrate parking demand would vary from 0 spaces to 105 spaces. As such, adequate parking is available within reasonable walking distance of the project to support the reduction in on-site parking spaces. APPENDIX A Pa�e 1 of 1 Robert Pergolizzi From: Robert Pergolizzi Sent: Wednesday, May 18, 2011 4:09 PM To: 'Robert.Tefft@MyClearwater.com'; 'tracey.bruch@myClearwater.com'; Bennett.Elbo@myClearwater.com Cc: 'Renee Ruggiero' Subject: Hooters / Starbucks at Clearwater Beach - Parking Study Good Afternoon - Here is a summary of our meeting this morning. We will be conducting a Parking Study for the proposed Hooters/Starbucks at Clearwater Beach this weekend. We will obtain data on # of employees, hours of operation, and shift changes. A mode split for employees will be based on approved prior studies to determine the number of employees requiring a parking space. Customers of these establishments are expected to come from the beach, nearby hotels, and from the mainland. We have surveys conducted for Surt Style/Britts that provided a good estimate of customer parking characteristics for retail/restaurant developments on the beach. This factor will be used to determine the customer demand for parking spaces. It is generally agreed due to the limited amount of on-site parking available, the customers (and employees) will need to rely on public parking in the area. I have field reviewed nearby public parking lots, as well as on street parking on Mandalay and Papaya Street. As discussed we will also include the Hyatt Aqualea garage (764 spaces) as part of the study area. The total number of spaces in the study area are 1,033 including 8 handicapped spaces. We will pertorm hourly observations within these lots during the specified time periods: Friday May 20, 2011: 11 AM - 2 PM and 6 PM - 9 PM. Saturday May 21, 2011: 10 AM - 4 PM and 6 PM - 9 PM. Available supply within these areas will be compared to expected parking demand. A written report will be provided. I usually submit 3 copies. It is expected to be a very warm and sunny weekend, so it is perfect for doing this study. Thnaks Tracey for your information on the garage! Robert Pergolizzi, AICP, PTP Gulf Coast Consulting, Inc. 13825 ICOT Boulevard, Suite 605 Clearwater, FI 33760 Phone: 727-524-1818 Fax: 727-524-6090 Cellphone: 727-644-2695 email: pergo@gulfcoastconsultinginc.com 5/18/2011 ` � � � IqLEN7LU � ` I Y �� i � 'i7 ��.1.�lCC'S GLEN[IAlE � 5T '� Q WAY �, NORTH H6LWUOD M �y Nof fo Scale �� _ � �, � � < ;� 53 Spaces , AvsT N � �i y WAY ST � � BAY a } ' 33 �� ' aoauw�r 79 Spaces i45 Spaces ST 4 G ti �'C W � �� T5 Spaces � O ��• �, 23 Spaces � `a � p�R 60 ��. 139 Spaces i ��_ ,. ,� � � N 233 Spaces � S � GV � � � Q GV � V � 33 Spaces � � �� ° 4'1 Spaces cswr L___----- MARINA � a� Spaces '°94ccepting - Visa/Master Card/American Express Daily max rate - $10.00/$12.50 (where appiicable) ** Seasonal Rate - March through April everyday ***Permit Parking Oniy 9Vot�s: Does not include Handicap Spaces In�ormatiaro Stabject to Change �� ; 277l71 * ` k Spaces MARCNA ACTtVITIES LEGEND: (n � City Park � � Public Beach ■� � �' City Parking Lot �i � , Private Parking Lot �� ro ,�°a`-:� PrivateParkingGarage ■� ��'o,�� ~ On Street Parking V �. °'Pi °�a � Oversize Vehicle Pkg. � 6°�9� cqG (24°-40' only) � ��q} 4NLY (8arn - 6pm} ----------- C� EA R w,`� T�'R FIARB�R �RY\6dtTE PARKINC� _ Open to Public '� No. Location Rate Information i A 301 S. Gulfview Blvd. (800) 310-7275 � B 100 Coronado �r. (813) 770-48Fi1 a General Parking Information s (727) 562-4704 V Parking System Hotline � (727) 562-4892 m i - -:. ��, � t i r.. , n T x . .....�....... '�. f L C� f3��CH 1?vAi.:K � � ° Clearwater � � U�' ��, � e�\°��Y icr Parking lot #40 - 5AND KEY (1060 GULF BLVD.} ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT V Dpen: Sun-Up to Sun-Down (All times park g�t� i� o,�esi) � as3 sQa�es; �i.00��o�r -�a.2s J�m�r tseaso��E � WWW,112yCIeca1'Wc'�l'e1:C0111 t �--� n� i �b Section 3-1405. Shared parking. DEVELOPMENTSTANDARDS ,---•-�-•---•-•-•• -•-•-•-�-• ' j�= �� ':'� I I (`�' � _ `a'' I � — �I � �� OFFICE — e � �0� I — I � � I I — � I — � 1 I �"°� THEATER � I j� I �✓ I i _ I I I � -•�•---._._._._._.� :� SHARED PARKING shared parking dia�ram § 3-1405 WEEKDAY WEEKEND Night Day Evening Day Evening Midnight 9 a.m. 6 p.m. 9 a.m. 6 p.m. USE 6 a.m. 4 p.�n. Midnight 4 p.m. Midnight Residential 100% 60% 90% 80% 90% Government 5% 100% 0% 0% 0% Office and Marinas 5% 100% 10% 10% 5% Retail � ea �� -� �p �� U{_ �, � 5% -rj 70% (p 90% � 100% r"j 70% Overnight Accommodations 80% 80% 100% 80% 100% Restaurant � b� ��,3 s.f -� �q o r J -� 10% ? S 50% 1 p 100% ?. S 50% �J � 100% Entertainment 10% 40% 100% 80% 100% Places of Worship 0% 20% 10% 100% 20�% Others 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% � �� n� When any land, building or area is used for two or more uses which are listed below, the minimum total number of required parking spaces shall be determined by the following: �� L� w Multiply the minimum required parking spaces for each individual use, excluding spaces reserved for use by specified individuals or classes of individuals, by the appropriate percentage listed in the Table `1 �o �� 4z `�s Supp. No. 25 CD3:57 � j ��L � i�� j cv'7��.- �� h-I IG7 DEVEI,OPMENT STANDARDS Section 3-1405. Shared parking. ..--------. I � � --�� i I _ �� ' OFFICE , I 1 I I � I I � � � I � ° THEATER � I � � � i i i � � -•�----•-------._._�.�_p._.; SHARED PARKING shared parking diagram �-1 i G r( § 3-1405 . WEEKDAY WEEKEND Night Day Evening D¢y Evening Midnight 9 a.m. 6 p.m. 9 a.m. 6 p.m. USE 6 a.m. 4 p.�n. Midnight 4 p.m. Midnight Residential 100% 60% 90% 80% 90% Government 5% 100% 0% 0% 0% Office and Marinas 5% 100% 10% 10% 5% Retail l�, ` c� ��.� �� 5% (� 70% g 90% � 100% (� 70% Overnight Accommodations 80% 80% 100% 80% 100% Restaurant �p oC�3 ��' ��,�:,�� S 10% �� 50% 4c�� 100% -j� 50% �s.f 100% Entertainment 10% 40% 100% 80% 100% Places of Worship 0% 20% 10% 100% 20% Others 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% When any land, building or area is used for two or more uses which are listed below, the minimum total number of required parking spaces shall be determined by the following: Multiply the minimum required parking spaces for each individual use, excluding spaces reserved for use by specified individuals or classes of individuals, by the appropriate percentage listed in the Table (S 8Z ri�R�p Supp. No. 25 CD3:57 �°��~� �-� t�� '� �1 TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY FOR HOOTERS AT CLEARWATER BEACH 385 MANDALAY AVENUE CLEARWATER BEACH, FLORIDA PREPARED FOR: 387-391 MANDALAY AVENUE, LLC � : ' : : �1�7:�•ii GULF COAST CONSULTING,INC. REVISED JULY 2011 PROJECT # 11-018 � V Robert Perg iz , AICP, PTP AICP #9023, PTP #133 �� I. INTRODUCTION The 0.19 acre project site is located at 385 Mandalay Avenue and currently contains a ground floor retail shop and six apartments on the second floor. The site is proposed to be redeveloped as a mixed use project containing a 8,142 square foot Hooters restaurant, a 1,921 square foot ground floor Starbucks, and a 1,819 square foot specialty retail store (Crocs). The site is located on the east side of Mandalay Avenue between the roundabout and Papaya Street on Clearwater Beach (See Figure 1). The redevelopment of the property is the subject of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment in the Tourist "T" zoning district. This application requires an assessment of the traffic impacts of development. Prior to completing this analysis a methodology was established with the City of Clearwater staff. IT, EXISTING TR.�FIC rc�NDITIONS The property has frontage on Mandalay Avenue and has access to its small parking area and dumpsters via a rear alley immediately north of the roundabout. Mandalay Avenue is a four-lane divided collector roadway between the roundabout and Baymont Street. Coronado Drive is four lanes between the roundabout and S. Gulfview Boulevard, and Causeway Boulevard is a four-lane divided arterial roadway. As specified by Clearwater staff, traffic counts were conducted between 11 AM - 2 PM and 4- 6 PM on Friday May 20, 2011 at the following intersections: Causeway Boulevard / East Shore Drive Mandalay Avenue / Baymont Street Coronado Drive / S. Gulfview Boulevard All traffic counts were converted to annual average equivalents using FDOT seasonal adjustment factors. Existing traffic volumes are shown in Figure 2. Existing intersections were analyzed using the HCS+ software. The HCS+ printouts are included in Appendix A. At the intersection of Causeway Boulevard / East Shore Drive the primary movements are eastbound-westbound, whereas the southbound approach (East Shore Drive) is stop controlled. The HCS+ analysis shows the southbound stop- controlled movements operate at LOS B during both the midday peak hour and the PM peak hour. Presently the signalized intersection at Mandalay Avenue / Baymont Street operates at LOS A with average delay of 7.4 seconds per vehicle during the midday peak hour, and LOS A with average delay of 7.5 seconds per vehicle during the PM peak hour. 1 I a L � x � ��_`, r � � �� '�� " ►� �' ,� � �i � .si� � F Y�r ,^ w.r�"" at, �, ,� � _� � ' � ,��,�� t �� , y ' �f _ � i � � �» � � �,�� I � i ,< , � =� - '� , ; y '�i.�. '�' � ,, � r �., � � :•_.�t .J� + �� .; ` '= � ` x�,.: .+e { �'r" R" 1 � , .._._-- --�7tf�- e'_, t'-.� � i ` a Lni'� � . ., . y � .. �� ......, � � � �f� ��1r�..�f^f i �. !, �, • �;-f !'�, � �, ....�.� .,. � i , � A i � i - � .. �` , --'1"'�� 4 �Y- � f� M ��x�. T"" �' .i � ��. , a ",� + , f i i�"�-�� ,' ' �I � � i`�t i� +�+r�f�i!+� � � ,+ � ' :� � `.' � � ,�. , ' -- � .i� �� . ,r � : 7R � 't . � __ �s�'� �LL;d`� ' t �� ,"-'i' R + �f �$�ir! _ �.�'�4�i � � � �l M � ,'!.. � . � � .� � f• ��"�! �.. � �`—. _ ' " ,.1. ��y i'�'��r. �a: i� �„% � �-��w' � r.. :- ��,� r. . � � , �� . � � t� �' ► � , :,; � � u=�� ' 'i,�� . . � � � ,� � , . � �.. �. . ^^��.�� ' ' � i �� .�.. ; �' � .. � � E . �' -��e � rri I I ��I i i I II� III��. PROJECT � � � .. „� �� ,; .,�' ��'�` LOCATION -� . � � �t ' � �� ' �`+ �' _ # � ti � � � �� '�� q �-�' � ., �� I« �� ,r , �s' , f"- � .�y��,� � - yfF. �4��'; , f ��• ��',Jf `� f'� - �,� (i''+k.-' -•-�,fi ��. _�� Y , 2�� ?' '� �� .�a�`s,A""�.?w,- �� • � � +Ri. � �� c ��''%`_ �, �. rr x; R I �� .. � ^ ��.,d 'i` . �~�� -- �,t �'„�, A+ .:.4� �'�!. ' � i ` i t I :� w. P�,�g � R -�� :'�•�t.�,/�:� � � I �. ��.♦�. M �� ._. Y ' ... � ._.-� - �-- -�' ci�- "� � .,., ' �' _� � ,'. �� . .. - � ' ^� 4 c ... . �.. � ' .. � �GJ 1 � q\ _ y,: . �. � , . . l�. �� \f' ^�R ..o- " :. .�R �-� ,y�€� � R \ � +� . . . ,-.. - � .-.. - - _ . ..- � , .,..... �... . : � � � � . . . s.—. � 3 __ . . ___ . = I � a �.. �, . �_� � .. , . . � - " . +++�wr�� b ' �;� t" �. �i'. . .w� ^ w . �.. — — - —_. . __ .. . � , ,._z � �1' • .r � " --- '— � d l �� 1-�i�� l. � 6 Y'y. b� R L.L �� tf �1� �� - — _ � , ` � * �� 7E'��' �Nq ��`�` � 1 � j�� ' .�...�.w�t 4 �� . ' � I � � � :� �, ��4 . � �, ' • . , _� .� � ..�a� � � _ � ,. ___-- � -- �x ,�� _ ,� ! � ?.� - ,��'� a" oPs � � ie�c� - S�_c f f � E te � e �� w�..� . t -e �, ! �' • :: � • � • ' .� �S � " � ieR..�. ' '�; , F, � •' r Q 'ti ) �!t �' f; � �'ii �� '� ' . _. " • ., �v:�� F ,� � �� »�t� ` � � t �r t �; . • �S • . , ✓ b^ z . , . �,zi�.1 . e� NM � � �.: �g e��Sy R e re �'� ` ,. a-� '�1 � `""''. r , :. �� r , � ,.Fr..1J _ - - . e :' ,l. 'h �._�'R�f �H.—:-�•�i� q_. _ � R �� M ;G .S:y;M.1�tF,l'"..�. -, y cZ '�L 16' .�� ,d� 4At �Y��t ��Y � pJ � .� � �- . ��I�� 1 i . � �s �. � ' • � � .m � � �IM1�I, ^ �, fl,�� rt : �. � r , . , � � w , � �� ,�'� ' ;� ' ' ,4 . �"�*�? "t"` - .� — - ,:��' ty , ,?�x_. �. w r �` , ,. � � � -'�'.i'it�c*rr "` � � �,�� . _ � __�*,�``_" `� �,•"'�— ` �' _ :• �.. . ;�, ,� , � � , _ �``.`_ "�t� r i_�.� e d�.:°x-� �"�i'P�. �� a �i'• __ �� ` _, tt �i �4, � �,�yy�� r .i_ R � a �� 'I � ( ti �� r '4-�,':, a'a�k . a- � t � �� j� 't•� r �-+. � a i � .,� . F. ��,.� j_ . � � ' . �j'� w �E ti a .. . . � . . 4 � } +' " I vy k '. ,y��,r`` ,� B e, _k' �'—'_ f7�',�'n''� "d s. �. e � ►, � � � � { �� 'f;;r. � w+ � f a�, �� 3 t u � "r ' . M �..` 1 ' ....��e._ ar,;. ��.. sy, ts s � .,.�. �:.�, v � ,;kq _ � 4� � � � ,. �_ y' S, f. . - .....,.�..� . . .. , � _ ..,., �P�9�T�C'�' LOCATIOI`�T PROrECT �ro: ii-0�$ �:, �Gu�f �C�as� �onsulting, Inc. "ATE: �'GU�: �� Land Development Consulting 5�201 1 � +�� DRAWN BY: � I �tKC � ti M 1 � 0 � 0 � � � O CL � � 0 b U � � v m � � � v 8 _ � J W Z a r � M � ^ N N i�. � � n � M M �J 1 L-� i 2(�) � 3�g� � 49(41) � `!� I � (119)108 -- (5)12 � (19)30 BAYMONT ST -� f r �o� a v � N � � �t t0 M � O N .�.. M � SAN MARCO ST � ¢' j PAPAYA ST � � ti 4 � � � '� O a � M �v � (117)130 (870) �(�ss)�aa 878 CAUSEWAY (s�o) �8�0� BLVD � „�6 „�6 �b��lti 6� � �$n,$ MARINA �o � Q " "' O ^ M ^ 4�{ � � � �� 1 � � � p (XX) = MID-DAY PEAK HOUR � S� XX = PM PEAK HOUR � 285(246) � � � ,��' 10(26) � � � o �. � M � y � O � � � M � n v � M � � EXISTING PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUME (2011) Gulf Coast Consulting, Inc. DATE: Land Development Consulting 5�201 1 DRAWN BY: MKC A � O � H � W N PROJECT NO: 11-018 FIGURE: � � � a Presently the signalized intersection at Coronado Drive / S. Gulfview Boulevard Street operates at LOS A with average delay of 9.5 seconds per vehicle during the midday peak hour, and LOS A with average delay of 9.7 seconds per vehicle during the PM peak hour. Causeway Boulevard is a four-lane divided arterial roadway and according to FDOT 2009 QLOS Handbook capacity tables has a LOS D capacity of 3,560 vehicles per hour. The segment of Mandalay Avenue is a four-lane divided collector roadway with a LOS D capacity of 2,900 vehicles per hour, and Coronado Drive between the roundabout and S. Gulfview is a four-lane divided collector roadway with a LOS D capacity of 2,900 vehicles per hour, and Coronado Drive south of S. Gulfview is three lanes with a capacity of 1,550 vehicles per hour. EXISTING ROADWAY CONDITIONS - 2011 Roadwav Segment Midday�eak Middav LOS PM peak PM LOS Causeway Blvd 1740 vph LOS B 1984 vph LOS B Mandalay Ave. 813 vph LOS C 910 vph LOS C Coronado Dr. 1325 vph LOS C 1480 vph LOS C Coronado Dr (S. of Gulfview) 757 vph LOS C 929 vph LOS C As shown above all roadway segments and intersections operate at LOS C or better during both the midday and PM peak hours. III. FUTURE TRAFFIC CONDITIONS Existing traffic was adjusted by a 4% annual growth rate to the expected build-out year of 2012 to account for background traffic from other nearby redevelopment proj ects. The site will be developed as a 8,142 square foot Hooters restaurant, a 1,921 square foot Starbucks restaurant, and 1,819 square feet of specialty retail space, replacing existing retail space and second floor apartments,. Using Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation, 8�' Edition rates, the amount of new trips was calculated and estimates are shown below: TRIP GENER.ATION ESTIMATES Land Use ITE LUC Amount Dailv Mid-Day PM Peak Hooters 932 8,142 sf 1035 151 (81/70) 91 (54/37) Starbucks 933 1,921 sf 1375 101 (51/50) 50 (25/25) Retail 814 1,819 sf 80 9 5/4 5 2/3 TOTAL 2490 261 (137/124) 146 (81/65) Based on prior studies of businesses on Clearwater Beach a substantial amount of the customers are expected to be walk-ups from nearby hotels, the beach itself, and condominiums in the area. The data from previous studies indicates 38% of 2 i. 4 � � the customers of beach businesses are staying in nearby hotels or used another mode of transportation other than a car such as walking, biking, or Jolly Trolley. The gross vehicle trip generation was reduced by 38% to account for this capture, and as a result it is estimated the actual vehicle trip generation would be 162 midday peak hour trips (85 entering / 77 exiting), and 91 PM peak hour trips (51 entering / 40 exiting). The expected distribution of vehicular trips is as follows: 10% to / from the north 30% to / from the south 60% to / from the east PROJECT IMPACT CALCULATIONS (MIDDAY PEAK HOUR) Proj ect Road Se�ment Lanes Pro�ect Trips Capacitv Percent Causeway Blvd. (Roundabout- Island way) 4LD 98 3560 2.75% Mandalay Ave. (Roundabout — Baymont) �4LD 16 2900 0.55% Coronado Drive (Roundabout — Gulfview) 4LD 49 2900 1.69% Coronado Drive (Hamden. — Gulfview) 2LD 49 1550 3.16% Background traffic and project traffic vehicular traffic were added to determine total traffic for 2012 and the intersections and roadway segments were reanalyzed. The future traffic volumes are shown in Figure 3, and the HCS+ printouts are included in Appendix B. At the intersection of Causeway Boulevard / East Shore Drive the HCS+ analysis shows the southbound stop-controlled movements would continue to operate at LOS B during both the midday peak hour and the PM peak hour. Under future conditions the signalized intersection at Mandalay Avenue / Baymont Street would operate at LOS A with average delay of 7.4 seconds per vehicle during the midday peak hour, and LOS A with average delay of 7.5 seconds per vehicle during the PM peak hour. Under future conditions the signalized intersection at Coronado Drive / S. Gulfview Boulevard Street would operate at LOS A with average delay of 9.5 seconds per vehicle during the midday peak hour, and LOS A with average delay of 9.8 seconds per vehicle during the PM peak hour. FUTURE ROADWAY CONDITIONS - 2012 Roadwa�Seement Midday�eak MiddaXLOS PM peak PM LOS Causeway Blvd 1907 vph LOS B 2118 vph LOS B Mandalay Ave. 863 vph LOS C 955 vph LOS C Coronado Dr. 1426 vph LOS C 1566 vph LOS C Coronado Dr (S. of Gulfview) 836 vph LOS C 993 vph LOS C w l ) l N N � a � � � r. � � � �� 1 L--► i z(�) �1 3�g� � 1 51(44) � 0 � � I M � ..�.. � SAN MARCO ST � (124)112 � (5)12 � (20)31 BAYMONTST � � � O1 N � a �o � � M � �� M �� N � I� � � W � PAPAYA ST Q � ¢�' � 4 � � z ° Q � O � � � � w N � so� � � �v �(122)135 _(957) �-(835)8os 944 CAUSEWAY (950) _ (950) BLVD 1174 1174 ^�� `696 g � L�go,'I MARiNA h N Q � � Q N M q lD N � v � O v� � � � (XX) = MID-DAY PEAK HOUR � �, XX = PM PEAK HOUR � 296(256) J � I ��w 10(27) � o m � C{ o � y N � � � v M O U �v� FUTURE PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUME (2012) Gulf Coast Consulting, Inc. DATE: ��'"" 5/201 1 Land Development Consulting ��" �, � �' DRAWN BY: MKC PROJECT NO: 11-018 FIGURE: � � t ) i As shown above all roadway segments and intersections would continue to operate at LOS C or better during both the midday and PM peak hours. IV. CONCLUSION This analysis was conducted in accordance with a specific methodology established with City of Clearwater staff. This analysis demonstrates traffic operations at nearby intersections and on adjacent roadways would continue at acceptable levels of service during both midday and PM peak hours with the proj ect impacts. 0 + i. 1 1 r_��,��.�►:�=� 2009 Pealc Season Factor Category Report - Report Type: ALL Category: 1500 PINELLAS COUNTYWIDE MOCF: 0.93 Wee]c Dates SF PSCF ----------------------- -- 1 O1/O1/2009 - O1/03/2009 1.10 1.18 2 O1/04/2009 - Ol/10/2009 1.07 1.14 3 O1/11/2009 - O1/17/2009 1.05 1.12 4 01/18/2009 - Ol/24/2009 1.03 1.10 5 O1/25/2009 - Ol/31/2009 1.01 1.08 6 02/O1/2009 - 02/07/2009 0.99 1.06 7 02/08/2009 - 02/14/2009 0.97 1.04 * 8 02/15/2009 - 02/21/2009 0.95 1.02 * 9 02/22/2009-- 02/28/2009 0.94 1.01 *10 03/Ol/2009 - 03/07/2009 0.93 1.00 *11 03/OS/2009 - 03/19/2009 0.92 0.98 *12 03/15/2009 - 03/21/2009 0.91 0.97 *13 03/22/2009 - 03/28/2009 0.91 0.97 *14 03/29/2009 - 04/04/2009 0.92 0_98 *15 04/OS/2009 - 04/11/2009 0.92 0.98 *16 04y12/2009 - 04/18/2009 0.93 1.00 *17 04/19/2009 - 04/25/2009 0.94 1.01 *18 04/26/2009 - OS/02/2009 0.95 1.02 *19 OS/03/2009 - OS/09/2009 0.96 1.03 *20 OS/10/2009 - OS/16/2009 0.97 1.04 21 OS/17/2009 - OS/23/2009 0.97 1.04 22 OS/24/2009 - O5/30/2009 0.97 1.04 23 OS/31/2009 - 06/06/2009 0.97 1.04 24 06/07/2009 - 06/13/2009 0.97 1.04 25 06/14/2009 - 06/20/2009 0.97 1.04 2G 06/21/2009 - 06/27/2009 0.98 1.05 �� F/7R/7��9 - �7/�4/9��9 n aR i ns 28 07/OS/2009 - 07/11/2009 0.99 1.06 29 07/12/2009 - 07/18/2009 0.99 1.06 30 07/19/2009 - 07/25/2009 1.00 1.07 31 07/26/2009 - OB/O1/2009 1.00 1.07 32 08/02/2009 - 08/08/2009 1.01 1.08 33 08/09/2009 - 08/15/2009 1.01 1.06 34 OB/16/2009 - 08/22/2009 1.03 1.10 35 08/23/2009 - 08/29/2009 1.04 1.11 36 08/30/2009 - 09/OS/2009 1.05 1.12 37 09/06/2009 - 09/12/2009 1.06 1.13 38 09/13/2009 - 09/19/2009 1.07 1.14 39 09/20/2009 - 09/26/2009 1.06 1.13 40 09/27/2009 - 10/03/2009 1.06 1.13 41 10/04/2009 - 10/10/2009 1.05 1.12 42 10/11/2009 - 10/17/2009 1.05 1.12 43 10/18/2009 - 10/24/2009 1.05 1.12 44 10/25/2009 - 10/31/2009 1.06 1.13 45 11/O1/2009 - 11/07/2009 1.07 1.14 46 11/08/2009 - 11/14/2009 1.06 1.16 47 11/15/2009 - 11/21/2009 1.06 1.16 48 11/22/2009 - 11/28/2009 1.09 1.17 99 11/29/2009 - 12/OS/2009 1.09 1.17 50 12/06/2009 - 12/12/2009 1.09 1.17 51 12/13/2009 - 12/19/2009 1.10 1.18 52 12/20/2009 - 12/26/2009 1.07 1.14 53 12/27/2009 - 12/31/2009 1.05 1.12 * Pealc Season Page 1 of 2 � a • a Type of peak hour being reported: Intersection Peak LOCAiION: E Shore Dr -- Causeway Blvd rirvrGfaTF• Cleanivater Beach. FL 24 0.72 121 J; * � 24 0 0 e► i �. 800 4 0 � L 121 1. 897 0.91 897 +► 0.97 1� 776 0.94 897 �► 0 'i i 0 y 897 � • r 0 0 0 � a t 0 0.00 0 � �Srr�r j � a � � ,' � o � � � O I J .► i b � � Z .► � F z r �� t �� Method for Peak-Hour: 1:00 PM -- 2:00 PM Peak 15-Min: 1:45 PM -- 2:00 PM � �t.l��i'�� 3i1�'l��s � � �� J ---► � � ak hour: Total Entering Volume QC JOB #: 10618702 QAiE: 5/20/2011 0.0 1.7 J i * � 0.0 0.0 0.0 .! i �. 3.4 « 0.0 1 " R 1•7 IY 3.2 4.2 �► ' ��' « 3.5 42 � 0.0 'i ' i 0.0 �► 4.2 �, t �► o.o o.o o.o � a ,► o.o o.o 0 0 0 �., a a o s t o o .► � � o o z � o h t f' � 0 0 0 � J .7 i 4 L-- � � '� « � z � ��► t �� R• = RTOR 15-Min Count E Shore Dr E Shore Dr Causeway Blvd Causeway Bivd Period (Northbound) (Southbound) (Eastbound) (Westbound) To�� Hourly Beginning At Left Thru Ri ht U R" Left Thru Ri ht U R' Left Thru Ri ht U R" Left Thru Ri ht U R' Totals 11:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 212 0 0 0 0 210 22 D 0 446 11:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 203 0 0 0 0 211 22 0 0 439 11:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 183 0 0 0 0 222 26 0 0 436 11:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 175 0 0 0 0 1 BS 37 0 0 405 1726 12:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 206 0 0 0 0 205 23 0 0 436 1716 12:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 199 0 0 0 0 208 31 0 0 446 1723 12:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 169 0 0 0 0 223 33 0 0 432 1719 12:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 195 0 0 0 0 210 27 0 0 438 1752 1:00 PM ' 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 -0 0' 0: 223 0+ 0 0 0 191 28 0' A 446 1762 ' 1[15PM 0 0 0 0 0- 0 0 9 0 0 0 219 0 0 0 0 198 41 0 0 467 9783 1:30 PM' 0 D 0 b 0 0 0 6 0 0` 0 209 0 0 0 0 196 26' 0 0 437 1768 � .,: . ,, .:.., . ay%�,.' ., .*. , -M , � ..,,�= r'� , e -::. .'� ➢ . ,�'...`� L�?�Ke ;� 5 , 4? �.. s;r,. . ?� �> i�= ;�,�`� � �' �� Heavy Trucks 0 0 0 Pedestrians 0 Bicycles 0 0 0 Railroad Sto ed Buses Comments: Report generated on 5/25/2011 10:23 AM �'," --� 0 0 0 0 40 0 0 24 8 �2 p 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 1872 72 12 0 SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http://www.qualitycounts.net) x. ►, Type of peak hour being reported: Intersection Peak LOCATION: E Shore Dr -- Causeway Blvd CITYfSTATE: Clearwater Beach, FL 42 0.75 134 �1 ; * � az o 0 ✓ i 4 813 1� 0 � !. 134 � 905 0.96 1140► 0.95 1� 771 0.96 1140�► 0 Z !' 0 �►1140 h f O 0 0 0 �a t a o.00 a J � � 2 �.. z�� ,.�' � 0 � � I � ✓ i b � > < �,�« � s �M t r►� Period �innina At Method for determi Peak-Hour: 4:15 PM -- 5:15 PM Peak 15-Min: 4:15 PM -- 4:30 PM � C�u2lit�+ ��,unts .... .. 4 .. . � Y ---► � � ak hour: Total Entering Volume QC JOB #: 10618701 DATE: 5/20/2011 o.o o.o �+ *� o.o o.o o.o .► i 4 2.5 � OA ,r ' L 0.0 � 2.2 " 1.8 �► ` �,:: � 2.6 1.8 +r 0.0 Z ' �' 0.0 �► 1.8 �, t r o.o o.o o.o � s f 0.� Q.Q I � � � �J .► j 4 p � �R o 5 .► � 4 2 0 `L i 0 '� 4 d � 0 0 0 � �.► t 4 � .t �, < ,► �� « Z r � �� t �►� R` = RTOR Causeway Blvd (Vllestbound) Houriy _. _. . . .. ... T-v`uJ i r_._,_ �� 4t30 PM �0 '� D �� 0 0 0- b 0'' 7 -0 0 �- tl��281 ` �0 0 0`� 0„196 � 34 ' 0�� 0 518 � 4:45 PM A' 0 0 0' 0 0 0 11 0 0 ' 0 2A0''' Q 0 0 0 201 29 ' 0 0 531. 2088 S:OO PM 0 0 0 0 0 ' 0 0 7 0 0 0 271 0 ' 0 0 0 177 35 ' 0 0 490'"- 2087 5:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 0 0 0 275 0 0 0 0 214 27 0 0 527 2066 5:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 0 0 0 268 0 0 0 0 198 33 0 0 515 2063 5:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 0 0 0 226 0 0 0 0 214 27 0 0 481 2013 `�:% = r?.�'°� 4t � Heavy Trucks 0 0 0 'i Pedestrians 0 Bicycles 0 0 0 Railroad Sto ed Buses Commenfs: Report generated on 5/25/2011 10:23 AM _,_._._.�, �ro�. 0 0 0 44 0 0 0 2._ i 3a �--- `��B 0 16 0 0 20 0 0 � o � o o z o rotal 2192 36 44 3 SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http://www.qualitycounts.net) Type of peak hour being reported: Intersection Peak LQCATION: Mandalay Ave -- Baymont St CITYISTATE: Clearwater Beach, F 414 0.90 481 J + * L� 13 363 38 .► i 4 60 4 7 � t 123 1. 147 078 8 .► 0.94 � 5 0.76 57 � 42 Z i 19 �► 60 '4 1 I' 48 351 14 � i t 430 0.95 413 � � I� 94 � � �,:` � 61 � � 80 � � d i b � .� < .. ,� « z � � `1 t f' � Method for determi Peak-Hour: 12:45 PM -- 1:45 PM Peak 15-Min: 1:15 PM --1:30 PM � C�UaL�t� �e�u�ts .. � ,�` .... . � '1 1' � � ak hour: Total Entering Volume QC JOB #: 10618704 QATE: 5/20/2011 5.B 4.6 �+ * � 23.1 5.5 2.6 J i 4 6.7 �0.0 1 L 2.4« 2.7 0 0 �► ' � `:k' 1. 0.0 3.5 � 4.8 7 ' � 5.3 �► 1.7 h t P 2.1 5.4 0.0 � i t 5.3 4.B 0 1 0 � .► i �. 0 � �t 2 2 � � � 0 � 0 f � 0 h t � �' � 0 0 0 � � � Period (Northbound) (Southbountl) �tassoo �ginning At Left Thru Ri ht U R* Left Thru Ri ht U R* Left Thru Ri t 11:00 AM 9 89 6 1 1 7 77 4 0 0 2 2 6 11:15 AM 5 73 10 0 0 9 78 1 0 0 0 0 6 11:30 AM 2 89 3 1 0 6 85 3 0 0 0 0 4 11:45 AM 8 79 3 0 1 7 72 2 0 0 2 0 7 12:00 PM 11 71 4 1 0 14 95 2 0 0 2 0 4 12:15 PM 8 87 1 2 0 9 75 1 0 0 3 0 8 12:30 PM 6 93 7 1 0 7 71 3 0 0 1 0 2 12:451PM 9 100 - 3 0 0 15 95 2 0 1 3 0 3 1:00 PM 10'' 78 4 2, 0 ! 4 96 ' 4 0 0 3 3 11 �; � , ; . , ,t ,. � - �. , � �t ,�« : . � a . 4� . _ �, 1:30 PM 8 60 4 3 0 10 88 " 3 b 0` 0 1 7 1:45 PM 4 81 8 0 0 10 104 1 0 1 3 1 3 3 ' SF , �,^--� '3 �` '�" � �� —�` �—"� Y� �y 40 _-7 .��9 q :� ` � �ti�� t4- Heavy Trucks 0 24 0 0 20 4 Pedestrians 132 64 Bicycles 0 0 0 0 1 0 Railroad Sto ed Buses Commenfs: Report generated on 5/25/2011 10:23 AM 0 0 0 100 0 2 0 J .� i 4 I-. .. �� « z � � h t P � R' = RTOR St Baymont St nd) (Westbound) Total Hourly U R* Left Thru Ri ht U R' Totals 0 12 3 0 15 1 5 240 0 3 6 1 19 0 6 217 0 2 3 2 22 0 0 222 0 10 4 3 23 0 1 222 901 0 6 6 0 22 0 1 239 900 0 2 3 2 23 0 2 226 909 0 1 8 4 19 0 2 225 912 0 4: 3 2 27 0^ 5 272, 962- 0 3 4 9 23 0 2 248 971, 0 4 4 1 25 0 0 238"- 1031 0 8 10 3 28 0 0 265 1024 0 0 4 72 0 0 0 Total 1092 52 368 3 SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http://www.qualitycounts.net) � a � ! ype of peak hour being reported: Intersection Peak Method for determining peak hour: Total Entering Volume LOCATION: Mandalay Ave -- Baymont St QC JOB #: 10618703 CITY/STATE: Clearwater Beach FL DATE: 5/20/2011 512 0.92 469 Peak-Hour: 4:30 PM -- 5:30 PM z.a z.s �; * I Peak 15-Min: 4:45 PM -- 5:00 PM � a t� 16 453 43 I 0.0 2.6 2.3 d i b L- .► i�. 66 4 12 � f. 111 �. 154 0.0 f 8.3 ,t ' � 3.6 1. 3.9 0.65 3 �► 0.91 �. 12 0.95 0.0 �► �±-' F 0.0 65 � 50 3 i 31 �► 60 3.1 +► 2A 7 ` t 6.5 �► 17 �'h t r' � h t � i 3� t� �113�i�'�' �i�U�'i�5 � a 2.o t� 539 0.92 403 .,. i r .,. -� i , ........ 2.8 1.7 � 33 I �. L•'_ 172�:: � ,;�' � 54 ��-'--'�`'� � 112 � J .% i t. L�. > L » � �. 7. i �'! t P � � � � � � Period (Northbound) ��ousnoouna� �inning At Left Thru Riqht U R* Left Thru Right U R" 4:00 PM 11 69 4 2 0 12 99 2 0 3 4:15 PM 9 71 6 2 0 15 103 4 0 0 I 0 0 1 �1.► � 4 o � �` , 0 �► � « 0 � 0 i � o h t �' � � 0 0 0 � �l f� � 7 0 �I .► i 4 � .► �t « Z r � �h * f'� R* = RTOR Baymont St _ (Westbound) _ To�� Hourly 5 32 0 5:00 PM" 10 ' 79 3�Y 1 0 B 128 ^ 2 A 0 3 1:: 4 0 3' B 3 30 : 0 ' 3 285 ', 1121 5:15PM 5 100 5 1 0 13 1d5 4 ` 0 0 : 2 0 9 0 3 10 -"1 19 A 0 277 1134 5:30 PM 10 77 6 2 1 10 93 2 D 0 1 8 12 0 5 7 2 21 0 0 257 1130 5:45 PM 10 87 2 0 0 4 95 2 0 0 0 2 6 0 2 7 1 16 0 1 237 1056 G'�.i : a.c'1��. ��a�� -�> � l Z '�.. �oc� :� ��' �-- I Z �t �i ---�� --- °� � � � � q2�T�f�_. Heavy Trucks 0 20 0 0 16 0 Pedestrians 84 5z Bicycles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Railroad Sto ed Buses Comments: Report generated on 5/25/2011 10:23 AM 0 0 0 136 0 0 0 R Thru`Riaht �U R* Total 4 12 116 0 4 1244 8 0 4 48 56 328 0 0 D 0 SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http://www.qualitycounts.net) v � ♦ ' Type of peak hour being reported: Intersection Peak LOCATION: Coronado Dr -- S Gulfview Blvc GITYISTATE: Clearwater Beach FL 663 0.93 703 �a *� 360 303 0 .+ a +. 360 � 25a = L a�. o 0.92 0 +► 0.97 �. 0 0.00 281 +► 27 �l i 0�► 0 Period Method for determi Peak-Hour: 12:15 PM --1:15 PM Peak 15-Min: 12:15 PM --12:30 PM �1 * P �, � aas o i��113��"�',� �Li�.1Ti�S �a t� 331 0.93 450 -'... F �'. -. . � � L� 4 � . � ;' � 0 � � 45 � J� i t.� > < � ,� « i � � `1 t l' � unt Coronado Dr �JJ11 1 � � ak hour: Total Entering Volume QC JOB #: 10618706 3.5 4.8 �+ * � 2.5 4.6 0.0 ,� a a 2.5 � 5.9 1 L 0.0 t 0.0 0.0 ♦ ' �� i� 0.0 6.0 �► 7A 7 " � 0.0 �► 0.0 �, t r► 0.0 4.2 0.0 � i t 4.8 4.2 0 1 0 � d i �. o S V t 0 0 .► � F 0 o � � a h t �' � 0 1 0 � � d i 4 � TT� ��« a z r �h t f'� R' = RTOR S Gulfview Blvd S Gulfview Blvd (Eastbound) (Westbound) Total Hourly Thru Ri ht U R* Left Thru Ri ht U R* Totals 0 3 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 358 11:15 AM 0 112 0 0 0 0 74 98 0 0 53 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 339 11:30 AM 0 101 0 0 0 0 88 87 0 0 62 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 342 11:45 AM 0 94 0 0 0 0 58 92 0 0 49 0 4 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 298 1337 12:00 PM 0 110 0 0 0 0 78 68 0 0 48 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 308 1287 ��r � �a . ,- , . � �,. � � , 12:30PM 0' 99 „ 0 0 0 0 64 :; 99 0 0 61 0: 3 `0 0�' 0 0 0; 0'' `0 326 : 1291" : 12:4BPM 0 113 0 0 0 0` 79 ' 83 0 0- 65 0' 9 " 0 2? 0 '' 0 0` 0 0 351 `' 134d 1:00 PM 0 117' 0 0 0 0 78 ' 81 0' ` 0 76 A 6 0 0` 0'' 0 0 0 0 358 ` 1394` 1:15 PM 0 106 0 0 0 0 75 84 0 0 72 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 340 1375 1:30 PM 0 107 0 0 0 0 77 76 0 0 65 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 326 1375 1:45 PM 0 117 0 0 0 0 71 83 0 0 74 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 351 1375 �;"7�'" S� ��{ •.�-f"�✓�� *Y 2A � �:��-�� 93�n Heavy Trucks 0 12 0 Pedestrians 60 Bicycles 0 0 0 Railroad Sto ed Buses , Commenfs: Report generated on 5/25/2011 10:23 AM 0 16 6 8 0 4 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 1436 48 64 0 SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http://vwvw.qualitycounts.net) ., .. ype of peak hour being reported: Intersection Peak LOCATfON: Coronado Dr -- S Gulfview Bivd CiTY(STATE: Clearwater Beach, FL 652 0.93 857 �+ * � 285 367 0 � i �. 285 � 294 ,? t 0� 0 o.a5 0� 0.93 � o 0.00 304 +► 10 Z � 0�► 0 Method for determining peak hour: Total Entering Volume QC JOB #: 10618705 DATE: 5/20/2011 Peak-Hour: 4:00 PM -- 5:00 PM Peak 15-Min: 4:00 PM -- 4:15 PM 'h ♦ (� � 0 563 0 ��.�.�f �� i * �r 377 0.93 563 ' � � L.� 9 � . � ,> � 0 � � � � ,► i b l-- ,� < »,�« Z � � '1 t P � �JJ11 1 � � Coronado � I I � S Period (Northbound) (soumoouna� �cascovuna� Beginning At Left Thru Ri ht U R" Left Thru Ri ht U R" Left Thru Ri ht U R* 3 1 4:15 FM 0 152 0 0` 0" 0 90 71 0 0 78 0 3 0 1' 4:30 PM 0 137 . 0 0 0 0 84 ' 62 U 0 65 0 2 ' 0 0 4:45 PM 0 123 ' 0 0 0 0 95 75 D 0 71 0` 2 0 1 5:00 PM 0 145 0 0 0 0 92 77 0 0 76 0 2 0 0 5:15 PM 0 121 0 0 0 0 80 85 1 0 93 0 0 0 0 5:30 PM 0 134 0 0 0 0 81 62 0 0 72 0 0 0 0 5:45 PM 0 125 0 0 0 0 92 63 0 0 58 0 4 0 0 �� '`�'�� c'"]io ��:t�� i�e�». ,�� ,:. G �, ( O -��,_� E� � b :� 3�n Heavy Trucks 0 4 0 ! Pedestrians 8 Bicycles 0 3 0 Railroad Sto ed Buses Commenfs: Report generated on 5/25/2011 10:23 AM 0 8 12 B 0 0 0 4 0 0 1 0 0 0 z.e �.s �a *� 3.2 2.5 0.0 .� i 4 3z � 2.a J � t o.o � o.o 00 •► <�;;� � o.o z.s .► �0.07 � o.a •► o.a h t P' o.o �.a o.o �a t 2.7 1.4 2 1 0 �.� i 4 1 1 �` O 0 �► � � 0 o � � o h t P � 0 9 0 � � .� i 4 � •► '� « i r �' �h t �'� R' = RTOR S Gulfview Blvd _ (Westbound) ^ Total Hourly 0 A 0' ' D 0 395 " D 0 0` 0 0 350 p 0 0 0 0 367 1519 0 0 0 0 0 392 1504 0 0 0 0 0 380 1489 0 0 0 0 0 349 1488 0 0 0 0 0 342 1463 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 rotal 1628 32 12 4 SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http://www.qualitycounts.net) Two-Wa� Stop Control TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information nal st RP Intersection enc /Co. GCC Jurisdiction Date Performed 5/25/2011 nalvsis Year nal sis Time Period MIDDAY PEAK Project Description EastJWest Street: CAUSEWAY BLVD Intersection Orientation: East-West Vehicle Volumes and Ad'ustments Ma'or Street Eastbound Movement � 2 L T Volume veh/h 870 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 0.97 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR p 896 veh/h Percent Heavy `J�hicles 0 -- Median Type RT Channelized Lanes Configuration IUpstream Signal Minor Street � � � � � 2 T 0 - Northbound 8 T Peak-Hour Factor, PHF � 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR � 0 veh/h Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 Percent Grade (%) 0 Flared Approach N Storage � RT Channelized Lanes 0 0 Configuration Dela , Queue Len th, and Level of Service Approach Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 4 Lane Configuration v (veh/h) C (m) (veh/h) Page 1 of 1 1SEWAY/EAST �RE :ARWATER 1 EXISTING 3outh Street: EAST SHORE (RT ONL Period (hrs): 0.25 �� -- �� -. . �_ ��'� � � � �� 0 V � Northbound 7 8 � � � �� n 0 E Westbound 5 6 T R 753 117 0.97 0.97 776 120 0 2 0 T TR 0 Southbound 11 12 T R 23 1.00 0.97 0 23 0 2 0 N 0 0 0 1 R Southbound 10 11 12 R 23 609 0. 04 0 12 y5 io queue iengtn • Control Delay (s/veh) � �- � LOS B pproach Delay (s/veh) -- -- 1 �• � pproach LOS -- -- B Copyright O 2010 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.6 Generated: 5/25/2011 3:03 PM file://C:\Documents and Settings�rpergolizzi.GULFCOAST\Local Settings\Temp\u2k43.tmp 5/25/2011 Two-Wa� Stop Control eneral Information nalyst qency/Co. ate Performed nalvsis Time Period TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Site Information p Intersection CC Jurisdiction �25/2011 nal sis Year M PEAK =ast/West Street: CAUSEWAY BLVD ntersection Orientation: Easf West Vehicle Volumes and Ad'ustments Ma'or Street Eastbound Movement � 2 L T Volume veh/h 1106 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR � 1164 veh/h Percent Heavy Vehicl�s 0 -- Median Type RT Channelized Lanes Configuration IUpstream Signal Minor Street � � � 2 T 0 Nort- d 8 T Page 1 of 1 JSEWAY / EAST �RE :ARWATER 1 EXIST/NG 3outh Street: EAST SHORE (RT ONL Period (hrs): 0.25 �� -- �� i �� -. . �- �'� �� Westbound 5 T 748 0. 95 787 2 T 0 Sout- 11 T � � � �• � � � � � i%� 12 R �olume veh/h 41 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR � 0 0 0 0 42 veh/h Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 2 Percent Grade (%) 0 � Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 1 Confi uration R Dela , Queue Len th, and Level of Service Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration R v (veh/h) 42 C (m) (veh/h) 598 v/c 0. 07 95% queue length 0.23 Control Delay (s/veh) 11.5 LOS B pproach Delay (s/veh) -- -- 11.5 pproach LOS -- -- B Copyright O 2010 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.6 Generated: 5/25/2011 3:06 PM file://C:\Documents and Settings�rpergolizzi.GULFCOAST\Local Settings\Temp\u2k43.tmp 5/25/2011 l�etailed Report Page 1 of 1 HCS+'" DETAILED REPORT Genera/ Information Site Information Analyst RP Intersection MANDALAY/BAYMONT Agency or Co. GCC Area Type A!I other areas Date Performed 5/25/2011 Jurisdiction CLEARWATER Time Period M/DDAY PEAK Analysis Year 2011 EXISTING Project ID Volume and Timin In ut EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Number of Lanes, N� 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 2 0 Lane Group LTR LTR LTR LTR Volume, V(vph) 7 8 41 19 5 119 47 340 14 37 352 13 % Heavy Vehicles, %HV 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.94 0.93 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Pretimed (P) or Actuated (A) A A A A A A A A A A A A Start-up Lost Time, I� 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Extension of Effective Green, e 2.0 2•0 2•0 2'0 Arrival Type, AT 3 3 3 3 Unit Extension, UE 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Filtering/Metering, I 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Initial Unmet Demand, Qb 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Ped / Bike / RTOR Volumes 94 0 15 61 0 11 80 0 0 51 0 0 Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Parking / Grade / Parking N 0 N N 0 N N D N N 0 N Parking Maneuvers, Nm Buses Stopping, Ns 0 0 0 0 Min. Time for Pedestrians, GP 3.6 3.5 3.6 3.4 Phasing EW Perm 02 03 04 NS Perm 06 07 08 G= 14.0 G= G= G= G= 38.0 G= G= G= Timing Y= 4 Y= Y= Y= Y= 4 Y= Y= Y= Duration of Analysis, T= 0.25 Cycle Length, C= 60.0 Lane Grou Ca aci , Contro/ Dela , and LOS Determirtation EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Adjusted Flow Rate, v 44 140 427 42� Lane Group Capacity, c 381 372 1959 2007 v/c Ratio, X 0.12 0.38 0.22 0.21 Total Green Ratio, g/C 0.23 0.23 0.63 0.63 Uniform Delay, d� 18.1 19.3 4•7 4•� Progression Factor, PF 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Delay Calibration, k 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 Incremental Delay, d2 0.1 0.6 0.1 0.1 Initial Queue Delay, d3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Control Delay 18.3 20.0 4.7 4.7 Lane Group LOS B B A A Approach Delay 18.3 20.0 4.7 4.7 Approach LOS 8 8 A A Intersection Delay 7.4 X� = 0.26 Intersection LOS A Copyright �O 2007 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.3 Generated: 5/25/2011 322 PM file://C:\Documents and Settings�rpergolizzi.GULFCOAST\Local Settings\Temp\s2k5C.tmp 5/25/2011 Detailed Report Page 1 of 1 HCS+�' DETAILED REPORT General Information Siie Information Analyst RP Intersection MANDALAY/BAYMONT Agency or Co. GCC Area Type A/l other areas Date Performed 5/25/2011 Jurisdiction CLEARWATER Time Period PM PEAK Analysis Year 2011 EX/STING Project ID Volume and Timin In ut EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Number of Lanes, N� 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 2 0 Lane Group LTR LTR LTR LTR Volume, V(vph) 12 3 49 30 12 108 42 336 14 42 439 16 % Heavy Vehicles, %HV 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 Pretimed (P) or Actuated (A) A A A A A A A A A A A A Start-up Lost Time, I� 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Eutension of Effective Green, e 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival Type, AT 3 3 3 3 Unit Extension, UE 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Filtering/Metering, I 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Initial Unmet Demand, Qb 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Ped / Bike / RTOR Volumes 172 0 15 54 0 11 112 0 0 33 0 0 Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Parking / Grade / Parking N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N Parking Maneuvers, Nm Buses Stopping, Ne 0 0 0 0 Min. Time for Pedestrians, Gp 4.0 3.4 3.7 3.3 Phasing EW Perm 02 03 04 NS Perm 06 07 08 G= 14.0 G= G= G= G= 38.0 G= G= G= Timing Y= 4 Y= Y= Y= Y= 4 Y= Y= Y= Duration of Analysis, T= 0.25 Cycle Length, C= 60.0 Lane Grou Ca aci , Control Dela , and LOS Determination EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Adjusted Flow Rate, v 53 153 430 546 Lane Group Capacity, c 364 368 1946 2004 v/c Ratio, X 0.15 0.42 0.22 0.27 Total Green Ratio, g/C 0.23 0.23 0.63 0.63 Uniform Delay, d� 18.3 19.5 4.7 4.9 Progression Factor, PF 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Delay Calibration, k 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 Incremental Delay, d2 0.2 0.8 0.1 0.1 Initial Queue Delay, d3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Control Delay 18.4 20.3 4.7 4.9 Lane Group LOS 8 C A A Approach Delay 18.4 20.3 4.7 4.9 Approach LOS B C A A Intersection Delay 7.5 X� = 0.31 Intersection LOS A Copyright �O 2007 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS+rM Version 5.3 Generated: 5/25/2011 3:25 PM file://C:\Documents and Settings�rpergolizzi.GULFCOAST\Local Settings\Temp\s2k5C.tmp 5/25/2011 petaalec� Report Page 1 of 1 HCS+'" DETAILED REPORT Genera/ lnformation Site Information Analyst RP I ntersection CORONADO / GULFVIEW Agency or Co. GCC Area Type A/l other areas Date Performed 5/25/2011 Jurisdiction CLEARWATER Time Period M/DDAY PEAK Analysis Year 2011 EX/STING Project ID Volume and Timin In ut EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Number of Lanes, N� 2 0 0 2 2 2 Lane Group L LR LT T R Volume, V(vph) 246 26 1 436 294 349 % Heavy Vehicles, %HV 2 2 2 2 2 2 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 Pretimed (P) or Actuated (A) A A A A A A Start-up Lost Time, I� 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Extension of Effective Green, e 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival Type, AT 3 3 3 3 3 Unit Extension, UE 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Filtering/Metering, I 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Initial Unmet Demand, Qb 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Ped / Bike / RTOR Volumes 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 45 0 0 Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Parking / Grade / Parking N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N Parking Maneuvers, Nm Buses Stopping, Na 0 0 0 0 0 Min. Time for Pedestrians, Gp 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.4 Phasing EB Only 02 03 04 NS Perm 06 07 08 G= 22.0 G= G= G= G= 30.0 G= G= G= Timing Y= 4 Y= Y= Y= Y= 4 Y= Y= Y= Duration of Analysis, T= 0.25 Cycle Length, C= 60.0 Lane Grou Ca aci , Control Dela , and LOS Determinafion EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Adjusted Flow Rate, v 254 27 450 303 360 Lane Group Capacity, c 1260 580 1693 1774 1402 v/c Ratio, X 0.20 0.05 0.27 0.17 0.26 Total Green Ratio, g/C 0.37 0.37 0.50 0.50 0.50 Uniform Delay, d� 13.0 12.2 8.6 8.2 8.6 Progression Factor, PF 9.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Delay Calibration, k 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 Incremental Delay, d2 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.1 Initial Queue Delay, d3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Control Delay 13.1 12.3 8.7 8.2 8.7 Lane Group LOS 8 8 A A A Approach Delay 13.0 8.7 8.5 Approach LOS 8 A A Intersection Delay g.5 X� = 0.24 Intersection LOS A Copyright O 2007 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.3 Generated: 5/25/2011 3:35 PM file://C:\Documents and Settings�rpergolizzi.GULFCOAST\Local Settings\Temp\s2k7E.tmp 5/25/2011 Deta.iled Report Page 1 of 1 HCS+'� DETAILED REPORT Genera/ lnformation Site lnformaiion Analyst RP Intersection CORONADO/GULFV/EW Agency or Co. GCC Area Type A/l other areas Date Pertormed 5/25/2011 Jurisdiction CLEARWATER Time Period PM PEAK Analysis Year 2011 EXISTING Project ID Volume and Timin In ut EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Number of Lanes, N� 2 0 0 2 2 2 Lane Group L LR LT T R Volume, V(vph) 285 10 0 563 356 276 % Heavy Vehicles, %HV 2 2 2 2 2 2 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 Pretimed (P) or Actuated (A) A A A A A A Start-up Lost Time, I� 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Extension of Effective Green, e 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival Type, AT 3 3 3 3 3 Unit Extension, UE 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Filterin /Metering, I 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 9.000 Initial Unmet Demand, Qb D.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Ped / Bike / RTOR Volumes 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 45 0 0 Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Parking / Grade / Parking N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N Parking Maneuvers, Nm Buses Stopping, NB 0 0 0 0 0 Min. Time for Pedestrians, Gp 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.4 Phasing EB Only 02 03 04 NS Perm 06 07 08 G= 22.0 G= G= G= G= 30.0 G= G= G= Timing Y= 4 Y= Y= Y= Y= 4 Y= Y= Y= Duration of Analysis, T= 0.25 Cycle Length, C= 60.0 Lane Grou Ca aci , Control Dela , and LOS Determination EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Adjusted Flow Rate, v 306 11 605 383 297 Lane Group Capacity, c 1260 580 1774 1774 1402 v/c Ratio, X 0.24 0.02 0.34 0.22 0.21 Total Green Ratio, g/C 0.37 0.37 0.50 0.50 0.50 Uniform Delay, d� 13.2 12.1 9.0 8.4 8.4 Progression Factor, PF 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Delay Calibration, k 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 Incremental Delay, d2 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 Initial Queue Delay, d3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Control Delay 13.3 12.1 9.2 8.5 8.5 Lane Group LOS 8 8 A A A Approach Delay 13.3 9.2 8•5 Approach LOS 8 A A Intersection Delay g.7 X� = 0.30 Intersection LOS A Copyright �O 2007 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.3 Generated: 5/25/2011 3:38 PM file://C:\Documents and Settings�rpergolizzi.GULFCOAST\Local Settings\Temp\s2k7E.tmp 5/25/2011 :� TABLE 4 Generalized Pe�k Hour �°'wo-Way Volumes for Florida's Urbanized Areas �oi4i�o STATE SIGNALIZED ARTERIALS FREEWAYS CI3SS I(>0.00 to 1.99 signalized intersections per mile) Lanes B C D E L,anes Median B C D E 4 4,000 5,500 6,770 7,300 2 Undivided 930 1,500 1 *** 6 6,000 8,320 10,150 11,290 4 Divided 2,840 3,440 3 560 *** 8 8,000 11,050 13,480 15,270 6 Divided 4,370 5,200 5,360 *** 10 10,000 13,960 16,930 19,250 8 Divided 5,900 6,970 7,160 *** 12 13,730 18,600 21,950 23,230 ��`� Freeway Adjustments C1aSS II (2.00 to 4.50 sigialized intersections per mile) Auxiliary Ramp Lanes Median B C D E Lanes Metering 2 Undivided ** 1,020 1,480 1,570 + 1,800 + 5% 4 Divided ** 2,420 3,220 3,400 6 Divided ** 3,790 4,880 5,150 UNINTERRUPTED FLOW HIGHWAYS � Divided ** 5,15�) 6153� 6,880 �D e�-tY 1 u`t 1� S Lanes Median B C D E l.P Ct-i`4 Cr��3et4r�.'t� 2V0�% ZCtOD Class III/IV (more than 4.50 signalized intersections per mile) 2 Undivided 730 1,460 2,080 2,620 Lanes Median B C D E 4 Divided 3,220 4,660 6,040 6,840 2 Undivided ** 500 1,150 1,440 6 Divided 4,840 6,990 9,060 10,280 4 Divided ** 1,220 2,730 3,100 Uninterrupted Flow Highway Adjustments 6 Divided ** 1,910 4,240 4,680 Lanes Median Exclusive left lanes Adjustrnent factors 8 Divided ** 2,620 5,770 6,280 2 Divided Yes +5% Multi Undivided Yes -5% Multi Undivided No -25°/a Non-State Signalized Roadway Adjustments BICYCLE MODE2 (Alter corresponding state volumes by the indicated percent.) (Mulriply motorized vehicle volumes shown below by number of directional roadway lanes to detemune two-way maxunum service volumes.) Major City/County Roadways - 10% Paved Shoulder/ Bicycle Lane Other Signalized Roadways - 35% Coverage B C D E 0-49% ** 310 1,180 >1,180 State & Non-State Signalized Roadway Adjustments so-s4% 240 360 >360 *** (Alter corresponding state wlumes by the indicated percent.) 85-100% fi20 >620 *** *** Divided/iJndivided & Turn Lane Adjustments Z Exclusive Exclusive Adjustment PEDESTRIAN MODE Lanes Median Left Lanes Right Lanes Faa (Mulriply motorized vehicle volumes shown below by number of d'uectional 2 Divided Yes No +5° roadway lanes to determine two-way maximum service volumes.) 2 Undivided No No -20% Sidewalk Coverage B C D E Mulri Undivided Yes No -5% 0-49% ** ** 480 1,390 Multi Undivided No No -25% 50-84% ** ** 1,100 1,82� - - - Yes + 5% 85-100% ** 1,100 1,820 >1,820 One-Way Facility Adjustment BUS MODE (Scheduled Fixed Route)3 (Buses in peak hour in peak direction) Multiply the coxresponding two-directional volumes in this table by 0.6. S idewalk Coverage B C D E 0-84% >5 >4 >3 >2 ss-1oo°ro >4 >3 >2 >1 � Values shown are presented as hourly rivo-way volumes for levels of service and aze for the automobile/truck modes unless specifically stated. Akhough presented as peak hour two- way volumes, they actually represent peak hour peak direction conditions with an applicable D factor applied. Tlus table does not constitute a standazd and should be used only for general planning applications. The computer models from wluch ttus table is derived should be used for more specific planning applications. The table and deriving computer models should not be used for corridor or intersection design, where more refined techniques exist. Calculations are based on planning applicarions of the Highway Capacity Manual, Bic}�cle LOS Model, Pedesuian LOS Model and Transit Capacity and Quality of Service Manual, respectively for the automobileftruck, bicycle, pedesh-ian and bus modes. Z Level of service for the bicycle and pedesuian modes in this table is based on number of motorized vehicles, not number of bicyclists or pedestrians using the facility. 3 Buses per hour shown are only for the peak bour in the single duection of the lvgher haffic flow. S021YC2: ** Cannot be achieved using table input value defiults. - FIOPld3 Dep3TfIl1EriY Of 1'T'anSpOI't3t10ri S stems Plannin Office *** Not applicable for that level of service letter grade. For the automobile mode, volumes greater than level of service D Y g become F because intersecrion capacities have been reached. For the bicycle mode, the level of service letter grade (including 6�� SUW3TLIl0e StTOet, MS 19 F) is not achievable because there is no ma�cimum veMcle volume threshold using table input value defaults. T311311a5S0e, FL 32399-0450 www.dot.state.fl.us�lannin�vstems/sm/los/default.shtm 2009 FDOT QUALITY/LEVEL OF SERVICE HANDBOOK �. ,� ,, High�Turnover (Si$�Down) Restaurant (9�2) Average Vehicle Trip Ends vs: '1000 Sq. Feet Gross Floor qrea On a: 4Neekday Number of Studies: 14 Average 1000 Sq. Feet GFA: 7 Directional Distribution: 50% entering, 50% exiting Trip Generation per 1000 Sq. Feet Gross Floor Area Average Rate 127.15 Data Plot and Equation 1,500 1,400 1, 300 � 1,200 � c W Q � 1,100 m U L � 1,000 � c6 a� 900 a' u ~ soo �oo 600 500 Range of Rates 73.51 - 246.00 Standard Deviation 41.77 -- - - - � - �-- X, - �' X 'X - - . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ' . _ .� _ _ . _ . X X - - - - X - , - X x X : x - X x, ,-_... - ... - - -- , - - I X 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 �1 12 X Actual Data Points Fitted Curve Equation: Not given Trip Generation, 8th Edition X= 1000 Sq. Feet Gross Floor Area 1795 ------ Average Rate R2 _ **** Institute of Transportation Engineers r • �� Fligh-Turnover (Sit-Down) Restaurant (932) Average Vehicle Trip Ends vs: 1000 Sq. Feet Gross Floor Area On a: Weekday, P.M. Peak Hour of Generator Number of Studies: 31 �,.._,_. �...� t'W �=� Average 1000 Sq. Feet GFA: 5 Directional Distribution: 54% entering, 46% exiting Trip Generation per y 000 Sq. Feet Gross Floor Area Average Rate 18.49 Data Plot and Equation � a c W Q F- a� U .0 N > m � c� � > Q I I H 220 zio zoo 190 180 170 160 150 140 130 120 110 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 Range of Rates 5.60 - 69.20 Standard Deviation 13.32 � - X -- � - - - � ;-' ;.. — ; ; - X � -- X -' � - - - - X - � � - - - - X : ...... ....�..,.X._�'�.:._...... ...__._X L-X-'-. , X , -.k -X �'. X ; - - � - , - , X- . XX .. �.. X ; ;C .' X h � - • • X � �X X X • � - � � X-X - • - - - - X - - �;' ° � � - ; X ;.. � - ; 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 X Actual Data Points Fitted Curve Equation: Not given X= 1000 Sq. Feet Gross Floor Area ------ Average Rate R2 _ xxxx Trip Generation, 8th Edition 1799 Institute of Transportation Engineers . , �( ,{ , FlighmTurnover (Sit-Down) Restauranf (932) Average Vehicle Trip Ends vs: 1000 Sq. Feet Gross Floor Area On a: Weekday, Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic, One Hour Between 4 and 6 p.m. Number of Studies: 46 Average 1000 Sq. Feet GFA: 6 Directional Distribution: 59% entering, 41 % exiting Trip Generation per 1000 Sq. Feet Gross Floor Area Average Rate Range of Rates 11.15 2.80 - 62.00 Data Plot and Equation � � � W a F� N U � � > a� � � a� > a u I-- 220 210 200 190 180 170 160 150 140 130 120 110 ioo so 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 Standard Deviation 9.13 ; X , �- - - 1 - - ,i , X - - X X ; � - X - � X � - : . . � � - �� X �� X X X � � � x' � � ` X � x: � � � � � ��3�-� � � � � � � X X X � �X - k X � . � X X ' '� X X X,� � � , � X :-__�< - XX x X X, ` . X >E � X � x' ` .X X �T , , 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 X Actual Data Points Fitted Curve Equation: Not given j Trip Generation, 8th Edition X= 1000 Sq. Feet Gross Floor Area 1797 ------ Average Rate Rz _ *�** Institute of Transportation Engineers - . ,{ , . Land Use: 933 Fast-Food Restaurant without Drive-Through Window Independent Variab/es with One Observation The following trip generation data are for independent variables with only one observation. This information is shown in this table only; there are no related plots for these data. Users are cautioned to use data with care because of the small sample size. Trip Size of Number Generation Independent of Independent Variable Rate Variable Studies Directional Distribution 1,000 S uare Feet Gross Floor Area Weekda 716 1 1 50% enterin , 50% exitinc Saturday 696 1 1 50% enterin , 50% exitinc Saturday Peak Hour of 54.55 5 1 49% entering, 51 % exitinc Generator Sunda 500 1 1 50% enterin , 50% exitin Seats Weekda 42.12 17 1 50% enterin , 50% exitin Weekday p.m. Peak 2.13 30 1 64% entering, 36% exiting Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic Weekday p.m. Peak 6.59 17 1 52% entering, 48% exiting Hour of Generator Saturday 40.94 17 1 50% enterin , 50% exitin Sunda 29.41 17 1 50% enterinq, 50% exitina Trip Generation, 8th Edition 1815 Institute of Transportation Engineers ., ,�: ,,, �ast-Food F�estaurant withaut Drive-Through Window (933) Average Vehicle Trip Ends vs: 1000 Sq. Feet Gross Floor Area On a: Weekday, P.M. Peak Hour of Generator Number of Studies: 5 �� Average 1000 Sq. Feet GFA: 3 Directional Distribution: 51 % entering, 49% exiting Trip Generation per 1000 Sq. Feet Gross Floor Area Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation �' 52.40 29.05 - 112.00 19.86 Data Plot and Equation Caution - Use Carefully - Small Sample Size � � c W � F- � U L � > N � N � > Q I I H zso 240 230 220 210 200 190 180 170 160 150 140 130 120 110 100 90 80 70 60 50 � - - - -- -- � - - - - �- - -- - -- - --- ------f'�- -- - -- -- - -- - - �� - ---- -- - - -- -- >�---- - - ' - - - - - - - -:= - - -- - -- -'- - - - '�/ --' --- --- - - - - - - - - - - - X - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -�� - - .- - - - - - ,' ` - �� - - -- - -- - -- -�'� -- -- - -- - - - -- --X - � - % Actual Data Points 2 3 X= 1000 Sq. Feet Gross Floor Area Fotted Curve Fitted Curve Equation: T= 42.68(X) + 27.79 Trip Generation, 8th Edition 1819 4 5 -----� AverageRate RZ - 0.72 Institute of Transportation Engineers • . 1 i F • ..._.: �.. ......�.��:. �C �::".:aL:� �.. �ast-�ooc! Restaurant withoui Drive-ihrough V�/indow (933) Average Vehicle Trip Ends vs: 1000 Sq. Feet Gross Floor Area On a: Weekday, Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic, One Hour Between 4 and 6 p.m. Number of Studies: 4 Average 1000 Sq. Feet GFA: 4 Directional Distribution: 51 % entering, 49% exiting Trip Generation per 1000 Sq. Feet Gross Floor Area Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation 26.15 14.28 - 36.36 10.51 Data Plot and Equation � a c W Q H � U L N � N � ro a� > Q n � 130 120 7io 100 90 so �o so Caution - Use Carefully - Small Sample Size X - X ,�� x. 3.0 3.1 3.2 3.3 3.4 3.5 3.6 3.7 3.8 3.9 4.0 4.1 42 4.3 4.4 4.5 4.6 4.7 X= 1000 Sq. Feet Gross Floor Area %< Actual Data Points Fitted Curve Equation: Not given ------ Average Rate R2 _ **** Trip Generation, 8th Edition 1817 Institute of Transportation Engineers l, 4 ,: �, .,�� ', �i �.> Specialty Retaol �eni�r (81 �) Average Vehicle Trip Ends vs: 1000 Sq. Feet Gross Leasable Area On a: Weekday Number of Studies: 4 Average 1000 Sq. Feet GLA: 25 Directional Distribution: 50% entering, 50% exiting Trip Generation per 1000 Sq. Feet Gross Leasable Area Average Rate Range of Rates 44.32 21.30 - 64.21 Data Plot and Equation � � c W Q � � U � a� > � � c� N > Q I F-- 2,100 2,000 1,900 1,800 1,700 1,600 1,500 1,400 1, 300 1,200 1,100 1, 000 900 800 700 600 500 400 10 Standard Deviation 15.52 Caution - Use Carefully - Small Sample Size X - - - � ;�- - - -�� -- - - - - -- - -� -- -- - .. ------�--------�---�--------------------�----------�-�-------�------------------- X X X 20 30 X= 1000 Sq. Feet Gross Leasable Area X Actual Data Points Pitted Curve Fitted Curve Equation: T= 42.78(X) + 37.66 Trip Generation, 8th Edition 1387 40 ------ Average Rate R2 = 0.69 50 Institute of Transportation Engineers � , . Specialty Retail Center (814) Average Vehicle Trip Ends vs: 1000 Sq. Feet Gross Leasable Area On a: Weekday, P.M. Peak Hour of Generator Number of Studies: 3 �� N�, � Average 1000 Sq. Feet GLA: 75 Directional Distribution: 56% entering, 44% exiting Trip Generation per 1000 Sq. Feet Gross Leasable Area Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation 5.02 4.59 - 6.18 2.31 Data Plot and Equation Caufion - Use Carefully - Small Sample Size soo �oo 600 � � c w p_ 500 H N U L � 400 � � cu � Q 300 I I F— 200 100 0 10 j- x X . - !� � � X,- - . - - -. 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 X= 1000 Sq. Feet Gross Leasable Area X Actual Data Points Fitted Curve Equation: Not given '----- Average Rate R2 _ �,r+� Trip Generation, Sth Edition 1390 Institute of Transportation Engineers a � . 3 Specialty Retail Center (814) Average Vehicle Trip Ends vs: 1000 Sq. Feet Gross Leasable Area On a: Weekday, Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic, One Hour Between 4 and 6 p.m. Number of Studies: 5 Average 1000 Sq. Feet GLA: 69 Directional Distribution: 44% entering, 56% exiting Trip Generation per 1000 Sq. Feet Gross Leasable Area Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation 2.71 2.03 - 5.16 1.83 Data Plot and �quation Cauiion - Use Carefully - Small Sample Size 600 500 � � 400 W � � N U L � 300 a� � ro � > Q �� 200 H 100 0 0 100 200 300 X= 1000 Sq. Feet Gross Leasable Area %< Actual �ata Points Fitted Curve ------ Average Rate Fitted Curve Equation: T= 2.40(X) + 21.48 RZ = 0.98 Trip Generation, 8th Edition 1388 Institute of Transportation Engineers � Two-Way Stop Control Page 1 of 1 . �, , TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information nal st RP Intersection CAUSEWAY/EAST enc /Co. GCC SHORE Jurisdiction CLEARWATER Date Performed 7/15/2011 nal sis Year FUTURE CONDITIONS nal sis Time Period MIDDAY PEAK Pro'ect Descri tion East/West Street: CAUSEWAY BLVD North/South Street: EAST SHORE RT ONLY Intersection Orientation: East-West Stud Period hrs : 0.25 ehicle Volumes and Ad'ustments Ma'or Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R olume veh/h 950 835 122 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.97 0.97 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 979 0 0 860 125 veh/h Percent Heav Vehicles 0 -- -- Q -- -- Median Type Raised curb RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 2 0 0 2 0 Confi uration T T TR U stream Si nal 0 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R olume veh/h 24 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 0 0 0 0 24 veh/h Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 2 Percent Grade (%) 0 � Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 1 Confi uration R Dela , Queue Len th, and Level of Service pproach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration R v (veh/h) 24 C (m) (veh/h) 575 v/c 0. 04 95% queue length 0.13 Control Delay (s/veh) 11.5 LOS B pproach Delay (s/veh) -- -- 11.5 pproach LOS -- -- B Copyright O 2010 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.6 Generated: 7/15/2011 7:15 AM file://C:\Documents and Settings�rpergolizzi.GULFCOAST\Local Settings\Temp\u2k5C.tmp 7/15/2011 �'wo-Way Stop Control Page 1 of 1 ,, . TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information nal st RP Intersection CAUSEWAY/EAST enc /Co. GCC SHORE Jurisdiction CLEARWATER Date Performed nal sis Year FUTURE CONDIT/ONS nal sis Time Period PM PEAK Pro'ect Descri tion East/West Street: CAUSEWAY BLVD North/South Street: EAST SHORE RT ONLY Intersection Orientation: East-West Stud Period hrs : 0.25 ehicle Volumes and Ad'ustments Ma'or Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R olume veh/h 1174 809 135 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 1235 0 0 851 142 veh/h Percent Heav Vehicles 0 -- -- 0 -- -- Median Type Raised curb RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 2 0 0 2 0 Confi uration T T TR U stream Si nal 0 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R olume veh/h 43 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 0 0 0 0 45 veh/h Percent Heav Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 2 Percent Grade (%) 0 � Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 1 Configuration R Dela , Queue Len th, and Level of Service pproach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration R v (veh/h) 45 C (m) (veh/h) 572 v/c 0. 08 95% queue length 0.26 Control Delay (s/veh) 11.8 LOS B pproach Delay (s/veh) -- -- 11.8 pproach LOS -- -- B Copyright O 2010 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.6 Generated: 7/15/2011 7:17 AM file://C:\Documents and Settings�rpergolizzi.GULFCOAST\Local Settings\Temp\u2k60.tmp 7/15/2011 Detailed Report Page 1 of 1 , HCS+'" DETAILED REPORT Genera/ lnformation Site Information Analyst RP Intersection MANDALAY/BAYMONT Agency or Co. GCC Area Type A/l other areas Date Performed 7/15/2011 Jurisdiction CLEARWATER Time Period M/DDAY PEAK Analysis Year FUTURE CONDITIONS Project ID Volume and Timin ln ut EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Number of Lanes, N� 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 2 0 Lane Group LTR LTR LTR LTR Volume, V(vph) 7 8 44 20 5 124 49 362 14 38 374 13 % Heavy Vehicles, %HV 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Pretimed (P) or Actuated (A) A A A A A A A A A A A A Start-up Lost Time, I� 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Extension of Effective Green, e 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival Type, AT 3 3 3 3 Unit Extension, UE 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Filtering/Meterin , I 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Initial Unmet Demand, Qb 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Ped / Bike / RTOR Volumes 94 0 15 61 0 11 80 0 0 51 0 0 Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Parking / Grade / Parking N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N Parking Maneuvers, Nm Buses Stopping, Na 0 0 0 0 Min. Time for Pedestrians, GP 3.6 3.5 3.6 3.4 Phasing EW Perm 02 03 04 NS Perm 06 07 08 G= 14.0 G= G= G= G= 38.0 G= G= G= Timing Y= 4 Y= Y= Y= Y= 4 Y= Y= Y= Duration of Analysis, T= 0.25 Cycle Length, C= 60.0 Lane Grou Ca aci , Control De/a , and LOS Determination EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Adjusted Flow Rate, v 47 146 452 452 Lane Group Capacity, c 380 371 1951 2004 v/c Ratio, X 0.12 0.39 0.23 0.23 Total Green Ratio, g/C 0.23 0.23 0.63 0.63 Uniform Delay, d� 18.2 19.4 4.7 4.7 Progression Factor, PF 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Delay Calibration, k 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 Incremental Delay, dz 0.1 0.7 0.1 0.1 Initial Queue Delay, d3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Control Delay 18.3 20.1 4.8 4.8 Lane Group LOS 8 C A A Approach Delay 18.3 20.1 4.8 4.8 Approach LOS B C A A Intersection Delay 7,4 X� = 0.28 Intersection LOS A Copyright �O 2007 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.3 Generated: 7115/2011 7:18 AM file://C:\Documents and Settings�rpergolizzi.GULFCOAST\Local Settings\Temp\s2k72.tmp 7/15/2011 Detailed Report Page 1 of 1 ,. . HCS+'" DETAILED REPORT General Information Site Information Analyst RP Intersection MANDALAY/BAYMONT Agency or Co. GCC Area Type All other areas Date Performed 7/15/2011 Jurisdiction CLEARWATER Time Period PM PEAK Analysis Year FUTURE CONDITIONS Project ID Volume and Timin ln ut EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Number of Lanes, N� 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 2 0 Lane Group LTR LTR LTR LTR Volume, V(vph) 12 3 51 31 12 112 44 353 14 44 462 16 % Heavy Vehicles, %HV 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 Pretimed (P) or Actuated (A) A A A A A A A A A A A A Start-up Lost Time, li 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Extension of Effective Green, e 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival Type, AT 3 3 3 3 Unit Extension, UE 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Filterin /Metering, I 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Initial Unmet Demand, Qb 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Ped / Bike / RTOR Volumes 172 0 15 54 0 11 112 0 0 33 0 0 Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Parking / Grade / Parking N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N Parking Maneuvers, Nm Buses Stopping, Ns 0 0 0 0 Min. Time for Pedestrians, GP 4.0 3.4 3.7 3.3 Phasing EW Perm 02 03 04 NS Perm 06 07 08 G= 14.0 G= G= G= G= 38.0 G= G= G= Timing Y= 4 Y= Y= Y= Y= 4 Y= Y= Y= Duration of Analysis, T= 0.25 Cycle Length, C= 60.0 Lane Grou Ca aci , Control Dela , and LOS Determination Eg Wg NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Adjusted Flow Rate, v 56 158 451 574 Lane Group Capacity, c 364 367 1935 1998 v/c Ratio, X 0.15 0.43 0.23 0.29 Total Green Ratio, g/C 0.23 0.23 0.63 0.63 Uniform Delay, d� 18.3 19.6 4.7 4.9 Progression Factor, PF 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Delay Calibration, k 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 Incremental Delay, d2 0.2 0.8 0.1 0.1 Initial Queue Delay, d3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Control Delay 18.5 20.4 4.8 5.0 Lane Group LOS 8 C A A Approach Delay 18.5 20.4 4.8 5.0 Approach LOS B C A A Intersection Delay 7,5 X� = 0.33 Intersection LOS A Copyright O 2007 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.3 Generated: 7/15/2011 7:19 AM file:l/C:\Documents and Settings�rpergolizzi.GULFCOAST\Local Settings\Temp\s2k84.tmp 7/15/2011 Detailed Report Page 1 of 1 �. . HCS+�' DETAILED REPORT General Information Site Information Analyst RP Intersection CORONADO/GULFVIEW Agency or Co. GCC Area Type A/l other areas Date PerFormed 7/15/2011 Jurisdiction CLEARWATER Time Period M/DDAY PEAK Analysis Year FUTURE CONDITIONS Project ID Volume and Timin In ui EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Number of Lanes, N� 2 0 0 2 2 2 Lane Group L LR LT T R Volume, V(vph) 256 27 1 479 329 362 % Heavy Vehicles, %HV 2 2 2 2 2 2 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 Pretimed (P) or Actuated (A) A A A A A A Start-up Lost Time, I� 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Extension of Effective Green, e 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival Type, AT 3 3 3 3 3 Unit Extension, UE 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Filterin /Metering, I 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Initial Unmet Demand, Qb 0.0 0.0 0.0 D.D 0.0 Ped / Bike / RTOR Volumes 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 45 0 0 Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Parking / Grade / Parking N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N Parking Maneuvers, Nm Buses Stopping, Na 0 0 0 0 0 Min. Time for Pedestrians, GP 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.4 Phasing EB Only 02 03 04 NS Perm 06 07 08 G= 22.0 G= G= • G= G= 30.0 G= G= G= Timing Y= 4 Y= Y= Y= Y= 4 Y= Y= Y= Duration of Analysis, T= 0.25 Cycle Length, C= 60.0 Lane Grou Ca aci , Contro/ Dela , and LOS Defermination EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Adjusted Flow Rate, v 264 2g 495 339 373 Lane Group Capacity, c 1260 580 1693 1774 1402 v/c Ratio, X 0.21 0.05 0.29 0.19 0.27 Total Green Ratio, g/C 0.37 0.37 0.50 0.50 0.50 Uniform Delay, d� 13.0 12.3 8.8 8.3 8.7 Progression Factor, PF 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Delay Calibration, k 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 Incremental Delay, d2 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 Initial Queue Delay, d3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Control Delay 13.1 12.3 8.9 8.3 8.8 Lane Group LOS 8 8 A A A Approach Delay 13.0 8.9 8.6 Approach LOS e A A Intersection Delay 9,5 X� = 0.26 Intersection LOS A Copyright O 2007 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.3 Generated: 7I1512011 7:20 AM file://C:\Documents and Settings�rpergolizzi.GULFCOAST�Local Settings\Temp\s2k96.tmp 7/15/2011 Detailed Report Page 1 of 1 .. ,�,, . .. HCS+�' DETAILED REPORT Genera/ Information Site Information Analyst RP Intersection CORONADO / GULFVIEW Agency or Co. GCC Area Type A/l other areas Date Performed 7/15/2011 Jurisdiction CLEARWATER Time Period PM PEAK Analysis Year FUTURE CONDITIONS Project ID Volume and Timin In ut EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Number of Lanes, N� 2 0 0 2 2 2 Lane Group L LR LT T R Volume, V(vph) 296 10 0 601 382 287 % Heavy Vehicles, %HV 2 2 2 2 2 2 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 Pretimed (P) or Actuated (A) A A A A A A Start-up Lost Time, I� 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Extension of Effective Green, e 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival Type, AT 3 3 3 3 3 Unit Extension, UE 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Filtering/Metering, I 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Initial Unmet Demand, Qb 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Ped / Bike / RTOR Volumes 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 45 0 0 Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Parking / Grade / Parking N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N Parking Maneuvers, Nm Buses Stopping, Na 0 0 0 0 0 Min. Time for Pedestrians, Gp 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.4 Phasing EB Only 02 03 04 NS Perm 06 07 08 G= 22.0 G= G= G= G= 30.0 G= G= G= Timing Y= 4 Y= Y= Y= Y= 4 Y= Y= Y= Duration of Analysis, T= 0.25 Cycle Length, C= 60.0 Lane Grou Ca aci , Control Dela , and LOS Determination EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Adjusted Flow Rate, v 318 11 646 411 309 Lane Group Capacity, c 1260 580 1774 1774 1402 v/c Ratio, X 0.25 0.02 0.36 0.23 0.22 Total Green Ratio, g/C 0.37 0.37 0.50 0.50 0.50 Uniform Delay, d� 13.3 12.1 9.2 8.5 8.4 Progression Factor, PF 1.000 9.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Delay Calibration, k 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 Incremental Delay, d2 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 Initial Queue Delay, d3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Control Delay 13.4 12.1 9.3 8.5 8.5 Lane Group LOS 8 8 A A A Approach Delay 13.3 9.3 8.5 Approach LOS 8 A A Intersection Delay g.g X� = 0.32 Intersection LOS A Copyright O 2007 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS+rM Version 5.3 Generated: 7115/2011 7:20 AM file://C:\Documents and Settings�rpergolizzi.GULFCOAST\Local Settings\Temp\s2kA8.tmp 7/15/2011 s' S • , ' Ci_'i ..... .. . . .. . . . . . .. .. .... ...fi . . . .�".' � ` ..... ' �- _ _ �1_, '��_, °" __ N JOBNUMBER�. Z 10162 2 a OATE. � 03.30.11 ¢ � DRAWNBV'. p JAB3 Z NO. DESCRIPTION DATE� o , -�snr pE51GNGINNGES J WAIFIGIICH 00.�f.il pE51GNCMNIGES 0112i1 5 �ESI(iNCMRNGES 012).it 6 RELOGiE W2�.11 WMPSlEPS i0 DESWCMWGES OSie.11 OESIGNFEFIHEMENiS OS t� OESIGNPEFINEMENTS OSN�i OESIGNREFINENEMS 0525.�� 15 9iEPFFNEMEMS OS30.�i 16 OESIf MPPMAI 0401.11 IAYWTSPDOED W.05ii wascou.raP<in. a.isi� t9 DESIGNFEFINEMENiS 0623.1t pESIGnFEFINEMFNiS �) v oRCCawEr��s or�oii � � = a � = N�,� • �- 6 w�r �¢�m \ �OLLm �../ `.�. OLL � ao? �. mzn � ��n � on x � � a � � Z H U Q Z a� g Z a O LL Q S � j U w� o � (� Q W LL o y �m ^ Q ¢ J p W < O Q ¢ O W � � Q p 2 Nw 2 a � mU a U SHEETNUMBER � PRE-1 :1 w SEAL 0 _ F i �' PRELIMINARY- 3 NOT FOR ' CONSTRUCTION O // _� ��/ � g, __,__. .._.. ... _....... . ... ..._.. JOBNUMBER�. 10162 DATE' 03.30.11 DRAWN BY: JAB3 �E&01lCYANGES 01.13.11 avriunw a.iaii DESIGHCINNGES OESpNCHNlCES PELUGATE M3"l.tt WAPSiERS OESIGNCH4�fE5 QiiBtt OESIf.NqEFINEMElRS OS.i9.i� OESIONPEFINEMENTS 052111 Of51GNFEFIHEMFMS �.25 SItENfMFY.E�nS M30.�i DESIGNIiPVPOVK 060iti IAYPRS AOOED RVSEDPF.TOP<IN OLiflil OESMNPEiWEMENTS 061J,i� OFSMV1FEfWEMENiS Oi ura*�viEw o�.a.ii oxcaxiervrs ozu.0 � � Z a e ;� < w�� T�/ 6 �� a \ N�xm � 6�LL� V L ` � � a?� 00 u"., w m �� m�� n � _ � ` a � Z F Q Q g Z a � LL O H = o �U � w O o Y ym Z � J 5 w O1 0 a� w Q �Y °z 3 a � �Y �W o a � �v a �j SHEETNUMBER � PRE-2 Z � w SEAL a S t � "' PRELIMINARY- 3 NOTFOR ' CONSTRUCTION O u �1 , a� _ � t,� __ __ _ _ _ __ ,_� N JOBNUMBER�. 2 70162 ¢ d Da7E: Q 04/26/11 U N ORAWNBV: o Author z 0 NO. DESCRIPTION DATE�. 0 WEPSTERS t0 pE51CNGWW'ES OS.�Btt DE&CNNEFINEMEMS Oit9.l1 13 OESIGNflEFINEAIENTS 051�.11 OESMiiHEFWEMENTS O.U5.11 t5 91TEFEFMBAEMS OSdO_It is oESiwrnvnau osoi�i UYpRSAODFD i8 MISEOIK.LUPaIN. a6t6t� fB DESIW FEFNIEMENTS 062t.t1 20 pE51(WPEFIe�EMENiS �).Oi.ii zi urareenEw m.as.n az oacco.wcxrs oeian � 1 � z a T = m� • � t�i� T� 6 �¢rm \ V/ OxQ a0'�o � 0 LL �o�a W w . � — m?m '"'� ��^ � _ � ` a � Z U Q � Z O " a x O � �w O a � Y > 0° �i � � 5w w m O oa > W � �¢ o ¢ � a -� � F'i ¢ U SHEETNUMBER � PRE-3 � N SEAL O C N PRELIMINARY - 3 NOTFOR � CONSTRUCTION O ii FINISH k2.; -�--- FINISH %3 -- � , FINISH %2 �:-. .. .- FINISH p3 �',, � �� 1+ : e � s 4 �� FINISH k2 I��-�� ._____________ I 1F. � I~ j II ,., ......I'I f FINISH M3 '. fFINISHN2 �'r-.... ..-,� � -ir.w:e `, . _;. �� . . __- . . _. u 6 t � �� FINISH p3 '�. :' � � _ —__. . ._. _ ._.. _ _ .__.. _ �r�m��_�.... '�,. riir �, �, � FINISH M1 J ,, I / i '. FINISH M2 � / ..:..^""_' �� -',, FINISHN2] ��. i ... � .. _ � _ � — . _ _—_ — � ... — .�: lti1V RC � FINISH tl2 ''�, �'�, �I { . �I I 7 ' u' '', _ . r f *� - FINISH #2 � .I I I . .... 'i,� .. jl .. ..� I �� i � I . FINISH� �`FINISH A'3] -.. i T - _ _ � ,k �a r . I I_FINI6H.Y1 , � ' , `. .... ..� ' i r TRf -{ — �� -' -� . — -"� �....-G i � FINISH M3 ] i . I! ..... ... �. FINISH R2 ] �� . . . _ __ �Srqp[N � �,._ r i � � FINISH It2 � p -�-��FINISHk1..i �� FINISHNI._I � � � � FINISH LEGEND FINISHyI ALUMINUM-CLEARANNODIZEDFlNISH FINISN y2 BENJAMIN MOORE - NAVAJO W HRE - 917 FINISHi3 BENJAMINMOORE-STONEBNOWN-2112-30 FINISHM4 BEWMMNMOORE-JETBIACK-2120-10 MATERIALS: WAI.LS - >TUCC,O RAILINGS- WROUGHTA�UMINUA�t UOOHS AND WWDOWS - IMPA�i GLA�S W� ANNOLAZEU AWMINU�d FRAPAES A4VNINGS - ALUMMUM OR STEEL ;_FWISHM3} �� FINISHp2_�'�. - - -- --- -. _- - . _. _ — _. . `' - — - - -... . ._— -- - wr_sr.wuE- L'�,.... . .�. Qr ' ; � -� +�-� �_ FINISH #2 I . I _._._._. �',., � .. .- �� .._. Lc- _ __ .....- _. _. _.. _... __ �at5_%aFn��.�: �. FINISHp3F...� .. _. ��r `1 � I {IjI i. � � juj� � - �__ .., I �FINISHR31 .................... I.�.11.. I ; I .. �L' ... .._. .FINISHk3 ��, I�� ... -- -�� ...+�FINISHpt � •wl . - - - _ - ..._- ....� , : � I..FINISHIt2� ._..... . .. .. .____ � I . .. ._... . _ - _:.r _ � � T— _._. .. � _ _ . . __ . Ik�� . ___ � <, 3 '. � FrN�sH «z r __ � ' ` I ' f� � ��—, — I il I � , I..FINISM!{3 j . . ..r ^ � .'.. _ __ - - �ur \... '.. T - _ -� . .-. _, _._ _ � _. � FINISH A1 �. _.►i ' .-.- ..., � ...-� � , _ ... ; .._ —T- _- - -j FINISH N1 i ' - � _ -.1 1 :..I i � I , r _� � � FINISH k2 f-- __ �_ �r - �. �. ::+�� .. ; + —,� -... _i- _ -_ � ��. � . - �s �� i W� G { — 'I W JOBNUMBER�. z 10162 Q � DATE: � 04/25/11 U N ORAWNBV�. � JAB3 Z NO. DESCRIPTION Or1TE o a �Sr 6 �E9IGNCHC11GE5 q2'.11 6 PELOLAiE .11 pUMP5iER5 0 �SIGNGINIGES OS.iB,11 SIGNqEFINEMENiS OS.IB.1 t� pF$I(INPEFINEMENiS 05311� S H pESMNPEfUlENENiS tt]S.ii IS SItE11EfYlLEMS OS30.11 tfi u51GN/�PPPWM �011i VWiS�D�ED 0.USEOIif.tOP<IM. 19 OESM�IPEFINEMENiS Ofi1]11 p OESWNFEFINEMENiS 0�.01.11 OFGG�MMfENiS Oii1.11 � � Z < � � ��ri �^ 6 'an \ N�xm a°�`o V � a?aa Oo . �_i mz�o �""� �� z ° ^ u i � � a < i:� Z F Q Q � Z LL 'o O � w o Y ym a ¢ N 7 J � W m �Y 23 � W �Y �w w Q a '� mU W U SHEETNUMBER � PRE-4 � w SEAL O H � �' PRELIMINAFY- 3 NOT FOR � CONSTRUCTION U �FINISH N2 � - �, FINISH #3 , �� _ . �.. I, FINISH N2 ,� --y �. FINISH #3.! . . . . ...:i i FlNISH %3 '. -- , FMlISIT Y2_ }-- �- - FINISH N3 ��.- . . .. � � FINISHM2.J ►�r�...'-.,— � _- . _ _—.__ � — _ _ �! l. -{ FINISH tl2.; i FINISH k3 '� . _...... __. ___. � � • FINISH C2 :� _-.. _ - - _.. . —_ _' .__.__ - - - _ ' . . _ . _ .. __ .. NrAtv�ru.�i � . � . . . U,6 �.. ' -. . � - I ...:. �' , I i _ _' �. - __"... -... _ ._ . _-�.- _' {..- . _- - _- ___. . �N� s��iP ...t I , �� .�...i � �'��, I i, - ....:_�T _ _ ...: _. -. —._....:�::. . __._ _.. . �__. ._. .__ . _ _ �I� II n 0' � . ^_�I � ........ 1 FlNISMM2.i '. I i _ _ �_'_ '! '. - tU%.00w '• _ _ .. —_.. .. _— _"" — ... ».� il Y �_ I ._... _...... ...... �.�1nN��.r+�N �I �i � tt-:.� � ....... ... .._ _ .T - -_ __ - —� -_ ...-.. _ _ .�..._ - � . ...? ,y H.C. SPACE;` ��,�_�__ � '� —e-v ��_1 . . FINISH LEGEND FINISHp/ �1LUMINUM-CLEARANNODIZEDFINISH FINISITY2 BENJAMINMOORE-NAVAJOWHfTE�967 FINISNI3 BENJAMINMOORE-STONEBROWN-2112-30 FINISHN4 BENJAMINMOORE-JETBLACK-2120-10 MATERIALS: WALLS- STOCCO RAILINGS- WROUGHTA_UMINUM UOOHS ANG WINCCWS - IAIPACI" u�ASS Wi ANNODIZEi ALUMINUM FHAMES AWNINGS - Ai.UMINUM GR STE[.l. ,- LFiNisH:z'. . � __ _ �s->.wr� ti_ ._ i -__ _ .— _ _____. _ - _- . ... _ . _. �_ �'' �,, _1 i FINISHN3_�' a.S '._ i ! FINISITY2 � -� � '.. — � � ... ._ _. . __—. .. . _---� �.. .... _ ._ �!�D� _iig q �_... "� , .-_. _. . ..__. . �_ � : I, FINISITY2 . �. -. ...-..►� � '". L , . . ... I, FINISM #3 ��. �i ''. I I I, I. - - -- _ _ _ _ —_ - - -- r ' _,_ _ ____ ___ __ ___ ' ___' _" ___ '___ "�_ i, �;. ' �� ._ - - �, .�aL_� I i, pp I � � � �, FINISMi2_� � fFlNISHp3� I -� FINISH M4 J - --�nr�r ., I .r �- FINISH t2 ......`.' _. r- �. FINISHM9_� F+�- � _i9tROpi ��i ... �f � v T � JOBNUMBEF: 2 10162 ¢ a DATE' w 05�� 9�� U N DRAWNBV'. Q Author Z NO. DESCRIVTION OATE o i ��Tr DE9Ki4 PEFINEMENTS S.i1 9iElefWFlAEMS OS.JO.i1 t6 OESIGNMFRWFL �) WYqR5PO0ED d6.Ofi.1� IWSED RF. tOP� IN. 06.�G1 i pESICNNEFlNEMEMS �fi1Jt� 40 DESM+NflEiINEMEHiS 0)01.11 12 pfiGGUMAEMS �'l.la�i ^ � y Z �J^ = N�� • �._ � ��N \ N�� 3��y�� _.. °a ? 3 W ¢w� � m�n /�- �� _ � a. a < � Z F- U Q Q � O " S � U w� O � �w o y �m � � 5w N m O OQ O Q Y z3 � � O Nw w < '7 M U w JSHEETNUMBER � PRE-5 C7 w SEAI � H � �" PRELIMINARY - 3 NOT FOR � CONSTRUCTION N Q (� WESTERN EXPOSURE \_2�_ _ _ _ --- _ � SOUTH WESTERN EXPOSURE JOBNUMBER'. 10162 DATE: 04/25/11 DRAWN BV: Author NO. DESCRIPTION OATE'. i�F��i'$'ii- OESNW GNN3f5 6 PELOWIE 011It1 W WS�ERS oE5MY1GW10E6 OS.ie�t DESIfi�VPEFINEMENtS a5.i9i� pFyGVPFFINFM.ENiS 651a1t OESIGVFEFWEMENTS 0515.11 i5 SIiEfEFWFlIEMS 16 OESIGM�IPPFWN 06Di�t ausconF.rav<�M oc�e>> �B OESNY�HEFINEMEniS � m ocs�ri+n�i�Menrs oro��i a oa.ccoo�ex*s o�.ia.ii � � z �z z • � w�� 6 t �Q��, � �'�Xm <�`� U� ° � <o� -... m=m � �� "— _ � � a < ti a � � � Z � � W O S F i N 3 0 � Z � U Q � H O " = u� 0 �>w w p Y a pp > J W Q i 7 J � W a O QQ a W Y �w Q ¢ < -� � U a SHEETNUMBER PRE-6 SEAL PRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION �;`� SOUTHERN EXPOSURE �.'„J- --- __ ------_ (� SOUTH EASTERN EXPOSURE �`,l JOBNUMBER'. 10162 onrE. oai26n t DRAWN BV: Author 10. DESCRIPTION DATE�. �� WMPSTERS pEyGN 'WlYES S.ielt OESIGNXEFINEMEMTS f6 pE51GNflEFINEMENTS f63 pELfNFEFlNEMEMS W]5.11 5 SRE PffM1ElAFNfS 6 aE51fNMPPOIN 060i.11 wiseuxr.ravaix. 9 �ESIGNFEFMFMENTS 06P3.i� pESIGHPEFINFA1ENi5 0] 3 DFCCOMAENiS Ot.Olit � � Z �Z � t ��n � 6 =a� \ N�xm ¢Q� a��`� V1'� � i V � �' m �1� � ��^ S � � a ti a � � Z � � w 0 2 � � � 3 � Z F- Q Q O " � = m � N >w w o Y �m > Q ¢ w J > a Y� °z 3 W � p a� a W Y � W ¢ ¢ a � �U a SHEETNUMBER PRE-7 s� PRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION EASTERN EXPOSURE t.� _ _ _ _ _ -- -- JOBNUMBEP�. 10162 DATE' 04/26/11 DRAWN BY Author JO. DESCRIPTION DATE '�I�AT�--�3ITr WAPSTEPS G OE5f�1C1lW:E5 YIiB.ii p[SIf1lPFFWE11FNi5 Mi4i1 OESpxRfFWELE1rt5 OF2�11 OESIGfIFFFNlEMENiS �S]S.tt SIiEPEFWFllEMS 0530.it B WJSE�PF.TOP�W. 06i6i� OF9fNPFFINEMFN�S W9 pfSpNHEFMIEMEMS OIOi.i� 2 piCLCMAEMS JI.i�.it � .� � �� Z Z �y _ ��n � w�� 6 yp�n \ 30�� aZ� W QWU> r mJ� S ��n V = t � � Z � U Q � F Z LL O � cn > w w ¢ j � Y >m w � Q 5w ? m 0 z° 3 a ¢ �Y �W ¢ < � MU d SHEETNUMBER PRE-8 s�� PRELIMINARY- NOTFOR CONSTRUCTION JOBNUMBER: 70162 DATE: 05/20/11 DRAWN BN. Author VO. DESCRIPTK)N �ATE�. �� i5 SRFflEFWB1ENf5 053�.11 ie ccswx,wvnax ouoi.ii �B MlSEDMF.TOF<Ik pEgGNREFNIEMFMS 06L.11 p DEyGNREFINEMFNTS 0].a1.1t t2 pqCC6MENiS 0)�111 � � � V 1 �� U R 0 � Z � � W 0 _ � � w 3 N � Z p N p _ �n � W � ° �a^�, � N¢a�' 3pLL�a?� po . ¢wm m�n � �a^ x s t � i� z � U Q � Z LL O � � Qa w o Y ym > w ¢ > � � 5W m p °z 3 w a w �Y f W ¢ ¢ < � t�i U a SHEETNUMBER PRE-9 s�� PRELIMINARY - NOTFOR CONSTRUCTION ;� OPEN 31 \SF I � �8 Sr Q O OPEN RETNL_ t�JE 65 SF 1819 SF OPEN 22Sf ...� . . ��.� I � � � ;I � il� fl OPEN i i�z ' ' ' I � OPEN 50 SF x� JPEfv ! 52 SF 106 SF FAR AREA SCHEDULE PARpNG AREA SCHEDULE LEVEL AREA LEVEL AREA 1 ST FLOOR 3920 $F 1 ST FLOOR 42% SF 2ND FLOOR 3167 SF 2ND FLOOR � 4517 SF ROOfTOPIEVEL B89 SF ROOFfOPLEVEL 3072 SF Grantl �o�al 7973 SF GranO �o�el 11880 SF NOTE: SQUARE FOOTAGE CALCULATIONS ARE TO THE EXTERIOR FACE OF EXTERIOR WALLS AND TO CENTER OF TENANT SEPARATION WALLS N JOBNUMBER� 2 10162 ¢ a DA7E' � 05/19/11 � DRAWNBV: p JA83 z p NO. DESCRIP710N DATE � i i iR OE9011RERNEMENtS OS1111 IJ OE9CWREFINEAIFNIS Mt111 OE4CN PEFlHEMEMS 051511 i5 9TE REFINEAIEMS 11G�� i8 OE9WMPPWK 060t.it R45EDPF.iOV�IM 4616�1 i9 OE9C�111EFlNEl1FN15 4Et111 M pE9(WPFANBIBlIS 0]-0��1t 12 piCCQME�(f5 0).ilt1 c� -z __ ��_ �� • o J w�� a NOn �� ¢'�m c,,, QoLL� V �o� � � aQg uV.� a -�� mm�n � p O n s � ` a � Z H Q � O " � _ � � �Q S Y ;m � m o oa g � o <¢ a Q Y �W w a � �o a U SHEETNUMBER ° PRE-1 � N SEAL � 2 f �' PRELIMINARY- 3 NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION O � � r � � � � � � �- n a � � U 1�s„ -1 �_a° � JOB NUMBER: z 10162 � � DATE: Q 03.30.11 U � DRAWN BY: o JAB3 z p NO. DESCRIPTION DATE: 0 1 04.04.11 2 3 4 5 8 10 11 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 DESIGN CIiANGES O4.19.11 CLARIFICATION 04.14.11 DESIGN CHANGES O422.11 DESIGN CFIANGES O427.11 RELOCAI'E 0427.11 DUMPSTERS DESIGN Ct�WJGES 06.18.11 DESIGN R6FINEMEM'S 05.19.11 DESIGN REFIN�MENTS 0524.11 DESIGN REFINEb�NTS 0525.11 SffE RFFINEMEWTS U6,30.11 DESIGN APPROVAL 0B.01.11 LAYOIiI'SADDED 06.06.11 RAISED RF. TOP 4 IN. 06.16.11 DESIGN REFINEMENTS 0623.11 DESIGN REFINEMEM'S 07A1.11 DRC COMMENTS 07.14.11 U � J Z J - � h^ Z > Z • 0 J � d � Z � � W � �C W = 0 ~ V � W F- � _ �� C Q U _I J 0.. � � � � Z � i» w 0 _ � � � � � T � N O � � 0 � m � H w Q V Z H U Q OC � Z � U � Y � O � � � � LL 2 aw �m � a� o� �¢ �w � c°�� U � T � N � ^ w� H�� N �QI�M � � T LL � � �Q�p'� Q J � I ��r� oo�� W � mZf� � � 0 ^ _ � SHEET NUMBER SEAL � z g a � � 0 � � � 0 w O a O a PRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION � � T4 a � � � � � � � � � U 1 /8" =1'-0" � H z � a w J U � H 0 z O 0 JOB NUMBER: 10162 DATE: 03.30.11 DRAWN BY: JAB3 NO. i 2 3 4 5 B 10 11 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 DATE: DESIGN CHfWGES O4.13.11 CW�IFICAl10N 04.14.11 DESIGN CHANGES O42211 DESIGN GHANGES O427,11 RELOCAiE 0427.11 DUMPSTERS DESIGN CF�WJGES 05,18.11 DESIGN REFINEMENTS 05.19.11 DESIGN REFINEMFMS 0524.11 DESIGN REFINEMENTS 0525.11 SffE REFINEMENTS 06.30.11 DESIGN APPROYAI. 06.01.11 L11YOtlTSADDED 06.06.11 RAISED RF. TOP 4 IN. 06.16.11 DESIGN REFINEMENTS 0623.11 DESIGN REFINEMENTS D7.01.11 LAYOUT REVIEW 07.06.11 DRC COMMENT� W.14.11 U � J Z J— �a z � Z • Q J � � � Z� � W � �G W = d ~ V W � F- � _ �� oC Q U J J � � � � � Z � � w 0 _ � � � � � T 0 N O � � � 0 m J �� w Q V Z F- U Q OC F- Z 0 U � Y Q � Y YO � J LL 2 >a Q W �m gW � Q �Q ,n w J c°h° U � T � NO�j�N W � 1-- d' � � N '�/�a� vf � T 1.1� � � � O � � •-- N OZ�� mZn � ^ � � _ � SHEEf NUMBER SEAL � z � a � � 0 J L.L °z N W � a � a PRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTI�N � � � � �, � � � � � � �. � U 1/8�� -1,_0° � JOB NUMBER: z 10162 � � DATE: Q 04/26/11 U � DRAWN BY: o Author z 0 NO. DESCRIPTION DATE � B 0427.11 DUMPSTERS 0 DESIGN CFWJGES 05.18.11 1 DESIGN REFINEMENTS 05.19.11 3 DESIGN REFINEMENTS 0524.11 4 DESIGN REFINEMENTS 0525.11 5 SITE REFINEMEIJiS 05.30.11 6 DESIGN APPROVAL 06.01.11 7 LAYOUTSADDED 06.a6.11 B RIUSED RF. TOP 4 II�L 06.16.11 9 DESIGN REFINEMENTS 0623.11 � DESIGN REFINEN�hITS W.01.11 1 IAYOUT REVIEW 07.06.11 2 DRC COMMENT'S 07.14.11 U � J Z J— �az � Z • � J � d � z� � W N �C W = 0 ~ V �- W H � _ �� C Q U J J a � O � C� Z � w 0 _ � � � � � 0 N O � Z 1-- U Q � N Z 0 U � Y Q � 0 � � J LL _ Qw } m � W � � � Q � W J i� U � � � Np�j^ {��N �Qi�M Ci 0 r ', � � � I �� r N Q Z � � � W � m Z n � � � � _ � SHEET NUMBER � SEAL z � a � O J LL J W W J LL � � PRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTI�N � � � � � � � � � � � �. � MATERIALS: WALLS - STUCCO RAILINGS - WROUGHT ALUMINUM DOORS AND WINDQWS - IMPACT GLASS W/ ANNODIZED ALUMINUM FRAMES AWNINGS - ALUMINUM OR STEEL � JOB NUMBER: z 10162 � � DATE: Q 04/25/11 U � DRAWN BY: o JAB3 z � NO. DESCRIPTION DATE; o a oa�.ti 5 DESIGN CHANGES O427.11 6 RELOCAlE 0427.11 DUMPSTERS 10 DE51GN CWWGES 05.1$.11 11 DESIGN REFINEMEM'S 05.19.11 13 DESIGN REFINEMEM'S 0624.11 14 DESIGN REFINEMENTS 0525.11 15 SITE REFINEMENTS 05.30.11 16 DESIGN APPROVAL 06.01.11 17 LAYOUTSADDED 06.06.11 18 RNSED RF. TOP 41N. 06.16.11 19 DESIGN RFFINEMENTS 0623.11 20 DESIGN REFINEMEMS W.01.11 22 DRC COMMENTS D7.14.11 U � J Z J — �az � Z • � J � d z� � W � °� W = a ~ V W �- F- � _ V oe Q U .J J d � � � � Z C� � w 0 _ � � � � � 0 N O V z � U Q o� t— Z � O � _ ~ � >a � o Y �m Q � m J Q IW- � O Z� w � �¢ � Y �J a —7 c°h� U �_ rn � � � 'N�� W � H � ^ M N aio�M � �� ao 0 I! ?� LL r � N Oo�� W � mZn � � � � _ d SHEET NUMBER � SEAL Z O > w J w PRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION � � � Z a � � � � � � � � a � � �r� ,�T►� ��i] FINISH FINISH #2 FINISH #3 � �� a s� w� a�� e`�� - �d � �dd� � �� ?' �� \ � ��4 �1�-!� ■ ■ � �Y�Y. �1-�� O�e �1-�� ■ � � r�� w� � � � ��K �I-�� " �'�� .�� B fi � � i � � � Fs� � FINISH #2 — — — �Ex��a �� , � � � � � � � ' ' � �s� �� a �� a e�� .•.. u , � �. �� i � ' � "`ik4�.�9 � �� i ��W.i � r� �° � - ---- i��i ��o.� ------ ��n� i�u i � �� r .��i 1 � � i � I I � s"�.L i"�7.3 � ' �� 1 ;�N�'S1 � �� i � ya� � i ��' �� p ��i � � .� iea�i � ��o.� -.^-°�°-- i w� � i i��i .es: .a�a _ai� o i - ��'�.'� ° �,Ri ��Ei _ � � _ . i . � . . :; �;.. . � ' • • i ' �.. ... ._ - __ _ FINISH #2 WGHES? RNISHFD AOOF SI�I �. AOOFTOP LEVEL 21' •D' _2NDFLOOR ��i•� B.F.E t7•D' FlNISH LEGEND FINISH #1 ALUMINUM - CLEAR ANNODIZED FINISH FINISH #2 BENJAMIN MOORE - NAVAJO WHITE - 947 FINISH #3 BENJAMIN MOORE - STONE BROWN - 2112-30 FINISH #4 BENJAMIN MOORE - JET BLACK - 2120-10 MATERIALS: WALLS - STUCCO RAILINGS - WROUGHT ALUMINUM DOORS AND WINDOWS - IMPACT GLASS W/ ANNOD ALUMINUM FRRMES AWNINGS - ALUMINUM OR STEEL �•s� �� , �� „ � _2ND FLOOR_,� �a•r v B.F.E 17•0' � m zo co c0 �(,� L'�] � JOB NUMBER: z 10162 � �' DATE: Q 05/19/11 U � DRAWN BY: o Author Z � NO. DESCRIPTION DATE� 0 13 0524.11 14 DESIGN REFINEMENTS 0525.11 15 SffE REFINEMEMiS 05.30.11 16 DESIGN MPROVAL 06.01.11 17 LAYOUTSADDED 06.06.11 18 RAISED RF. TOP 4 II�L 06.16.11 19 DESIGN REFINEMENTS 0623.11 20 DESIGN REFINEMENTS 07.01.11 22 DRC OOMMFJ�(TS 07.14.11 U � � Z J— �a z � Z • Q J � � Z� � W N �G �� o �' V W � �� _ L� OC Q U _I .J a � O � C� Z C3 � w 0 _ t-- � � � T 0 N O V Z H U Q � H Z -� O " _ � � �Q � Y }m Q � m � Q I-w— J O Z� � O a� � � ,� w ¢ . J � c° U � T N � N � ^ W � ~ M N � � � T � � � � T Q O 0 ��-T-� N Oo�� W � mZc�o _ � � � _ � SHEEf NUMBER � SEAL � O ¢ w J w PRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION � � > � � � � s 0 � � � � � � 0 � � � C) WESTERN EXP��URE SaUTH WESTERN EXP�SURE � JOB NUMBER: z 10162 � �' DATE: ¢ 04/25/11 U � DRAWN BY: p Author z � NO. DESCRIPTION DATE o a oa.�.t� DESIGN CHANGES O427.11 R9.OGA'TE 0427.11 DUMPSTERS DESIGN CFWJGES 06.18.11 DESIGN REFINEMENTS 06.19.11 DESIGN REFINEMENTS 0524.11 DESIGN REFINEMENTS 0525.11 SffE REFINEMENTS 05.30.11 DESIGN APPROVAL 06.01.11 RAISED RF. TOP 4 IN. 06.16.11 DESIGN REFINEMEKTS 0623.11 DESIGN REFINEMENTS WA1.11 DRC COMMENTS 07.14.11 U � J Z .1 — �a z � z • � J � d i� z� � W VJ � �, _ o �- V � W F- � _ V oe Q U J J � � � � Z (� (A w 0 _ H � � 3 � 0 N O � � 0 J m J Q W � Q V Z H U Q OC H Z 0 U � Y Q 0 � � � J LL _ Qw �m � W Z� � W p�p J c� U � d� T � N � ^ W � I-. �' I� � N � � � M ��' ¢��Oo � � T � N Oo�� W � m Z n � � 0 ^ _ d� SHEET NUMBER � w > W F- W d � W a � . . SEAL PRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION � � > � � � � � � a � �. � U SOUTH EASTERN EXP4SURE � JOB NUMBER: z 10162 � � DATE: ¢ 04/26/11 U � DRAWN BY: a Author z � NO. DESCRIPTION DATE: 0 B 0427.11 DUMPSTERS 10 DESIGN CHANGES 05.18.11 11 DESIGN REFINEMENTS 05.19.11 13 DESIGN REFINEMENTS 0524.11 14 DESIGN REFINEMENTS 0525.11 75 SITE REFINEI�IENTS 06.30.11 16 DESIGN APPROVAL 06.01.11 18 RAISED RF. TOP 4 IN. 06.16.11 19 DESIGN REFINEMENTS 0623.11 20 DESIGN REFINEMENTS 07.01.11 22 DRC COMMENTS 07.14.11 U � J Z J — �az � Z � � J � � Z� � W � �G W = L7 ~ V W � � � _ c..i oe Q U � J 0.. � � � � Z (� (A w 0 _ � � � 3 � 0 N O � 0 J � m J H w � Q � z �"_ U Q o� I-- Z � O " V = tn > Q Qw Y }m Q � O QH Y Q� O �w � J -7 c°h� U � T � Np�j^ F-�N -I � � T � � � LL Q� O �U'rCfl N QZ�Q O �� W � , mZn � � � � I = d SHEEf NUMBER SEAL � � w w > v W a � W a PRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION -EASTERN EXPQSURE � � > � � � � � � � n � � � � � U � JOB NUMBER: z 10162 � � DATE: J 04/26/11 ¢ U � DRAWN BY: o Author z � NO. DESCRIPTI�N DATE; 0 6 0427.11 DUMPSTERS 10 DESIGN CFUWGES 05.18.11 11 DESIGN REFINEMENTS 05.19.11 13 DESIGN REFINEMENTS 0524.11 14 DESIGN REFINEMENTS 0525.11 15 SITE REFINEMENTS 05.30.11 18 FWSEDRF.TOP41N. 06.16.11 19 DESIGN REFINEMENTS 0623.11 20 DESIGN REFINEMENTS 07.01.11 22 DRC COMMENTS 07.14.11 U � � Z � — �az � Z • � J � � � Z� � W � �C W = a� V � W F� �"' _ c� � Q U J J � � 0 � � Z (� (A w 0 _ H � � � T T � N O � 0 J � m J H w ¢ � Z H U Q � F-- Z 0 U � Y J � � � J LL _ Qw �m � aa 0 �Q ,n w J c°h� U rn � � N � N n ~ � N =Ql�ch � � T LL � � Q��Oo ��T-� N °aZ�a �w� m Z n � Q � n � _ a SHEET NUMBER � w > W > U w � � w a . . � • SEAL PRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION i � } � g � Y � O � � e � � � � � U � I-- z � d w J U Cn H z O 0 JOB NUMBER: ��62 DATE: 05/20/11 DRAWN BY: Author � DA 15 SITE REFINE]YIEIVTS 05.30.11 16 DESIGN APPROVAL 06.01.11 18 RAISED RF. TOP 4 IN. 06.16.11 19 DESIGN REFINEMENTS 0623.11 20 QESIGN REFINEMENTS 07.01.11 22 DRC OOMMENTS 07.14.11 U � J Z � — �az � Z • O J �. d Z� � W � GC W = � ~ V � W �� _ �i oe Q U J J �.. � 0 � � Z (3 � w � 2 E- � � 3 � T � N O � � 0 J m � �� w ¢ � z � U Q � F-- Z � U � Y Q 0 0 Y � J LL 2 aw �m gW o� �a �w c°i° U rn �t T � N � ^ W � H '� ^ � N � Q 1� � � M � � � Q��O �V-r� N O��a � W � m Z n � � � � _ � SHEET NUMBER SEAL � � � w > W � W � � w � PRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTI�N OPEN 65 SF OPEN 22 SF � � � 5 < �a � � � � � � a � � � � U _-.— - - .__ ' i vv �r __- TENANT AREA SCHEDULE TYPE OF TENANT TYPE OF SPACE LEVEL FAR PARKING OCCUPANT AREA ELECTRICAL ELECTRICAVPHONE 1 ST FLOOR YES YES MECHANICAL 80 SF ROOM MECHANICAL 80 SF STARBUCKS MAIN SPACE 1 ST FLOOR YES YES RESTAURANT 1546 SF HOOTERS LOBBY 1 ST FLOOR YES YES RESTAURANT 228 SF STARBUCKS PATIO 1 ST FLOOR NO YES RESTAURANT 375 SF HOOTERS CORRIDOR 1 ST FLOOR YES YES RESTAURANT 248 SF RESTAURANT 2396 SF RETAIL ONE MAIN SPACE 1 ST FLOOR YES YES RETAIL 1819 SF RETAIL 1819 SF HOOTERS BALCONY 2ND FLOOR NO YES RESTAURAN� 1350 SF HOOTERS MAIN SPACE 2ND FLOOR YES YES RESTAURANT 2058 SF HOOTERS LOBBY 2ND FLOOR YES YES RESTAURANT 150 SF HOOTERS KITCHEN 2ND FLOOR YES YES RESTAURANT 956 SF RESTAURANT 4513 SF MECHANICAL ELEV. EQUIP. ROOFTOP LEVEL NO NO MECHANICAL 88 SF MECHANICAL WELL NON-PUBLIC ACCESS ROOFTOP LEVEL NO NO MECHANICAL 868 SF MECHANICAL 956 SF HOOTERS COVERED BAR / ROOFfOP LEVEL NO YES RESTAURANT 979 SF SEATING HOOTERS LOBBY ROOFfOP LEVEL YES YES RESTAURANT 240 SF HOOTERS UNISEX TOILET ROOM ROOFTOP LEVEL YES YES RESTAURANT 81 SF HOOTERS DRY STORAGE ROOFTOP LEVEL YES NO RESTAURANT 320 SF HOOTERS BEER COOLER ROOFTOP LEVEL YES NO RESTAURANT 248 SF HOOTERS OPEN SEATING ROOFfOP LEVEL NO YES RESTAURANT 1772 SF RESTAURANT 3640 SF Grand total 13404 SF FAR AREA SCHEDULE LEVEL AREA 1 ST FLOOR 3920 SF 2ND FLOOR 3163 SF ROOFTOP LEVEL 889 SF Grand total 7973 SF _ �_ - �— PARKING AREA SCHEDULE LEVEL AREA 1 ST FLOOR 4296 SF 2ND FLOOR 4513 SF ROOFfOP LEVEL 3072 SF Grand total 11880 SF NOTE: SQUARE FOOTAGE CALCULATIONS ARE TO THE EXTERIOR FACE OF EXTERIOR WALLS AND TO CENTER OF TENANT SEPARATION WALLS � JOB NUMBER: z 10162 � �' DATE: ¢ 05/19/11 U � DRAWN BY: o JAB3 Z � NO. DESCRIPTION DATE; 0 11 05.19.11 2 DESIGN REFINEMENTS 0523.11 3 DESYGN REFINEMEM'S 0524.11 4 DESIGN REFINEMEMS 0525.11 5 SITE REFINEMEM'S 06,90.11 6 DESIGN APPROVAL 06.01.11 e RAISED RF. TOP 4 IN. 06.16.11 9 DESIGN REFINEMENTS 0623.11 0 DESIGN REFINEMENTS 07.01.11 2 DRC COMMENTS 07.14.11 U � J Z � — �a Z � Z • Q J � � � z� � W N °� W = � ~ V � W F- �"" _ V Cie d U J J a � O � C� Z � � w 0 _ � � � � � T 0 N O � 0 0 J m J Q W � Q V z �' U Q OC F— Z -� O " _ � >a Q �m � "J Q I— O Z� O �W � . J � c°h� U rn � T � NO�jN W � ^ � � � � N �a��, � � T LL. � � � r Q�J O ��T`� N Q Z � Q � W � �mZti � n�ti 2 � SHEEf NUMBER � SEAL Z Q d W � Q PRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION � � 5 $ � Y � � � 8 e a g U OPEN 31 SF �� ; i ; � : , , :' e P' a ' " . . . . . _ .. HOQTERS _=�8 SF --� ---a ---1 c �� iii iii i 0 OPEN 65 SF � I OPEN 22 SF � _ , _, _.... � c� � 0� STARBUCKS 375 SF RETAIL ONE 1819 SF STARBUCKS � 1546 S F _-� � � � \ _�� " � OPEN 1 ST FL00 R' 06 SF 1 � /07�� _ i � nN 0 I � I w �! � OPEN 80 SF � � �� iii ii �. �� i � �� OPEN i � 50 SF .� OPEN 52 SF �--�- -- TENANT AREA SCHEDULE TYPE OF TENANT TYPE OF SPACE LEVEL FAR PARKING OCCUPANT AREA ELECTRICAL ELECTRICAUPHONE 1ST FLOOR YES YES MECHANICAL 80 SF ROOM MECHANICAL 80 SF STARBUCKS MAIN SPACE 1ST FLOOR YES YES RESTAURANT 1546 SF HOOTERS LOBBY 1ST FLOOR YES YES RESTAURANT 228 SF STARBUCKS PATIO 1 ST FLOOR NO YES RESTAURANT 375 SF HOOTERS CORRIDOR 1ST FLOOR YES YES RESTAURANT 248 SF RESTAURANT 2396 SF RETAIL ONE MAIN SPACE 1ST FLOOR YES YES RETAIL 1819 SF RETAIL 1819 SF HOOTERS BALCONY 2ND FLOOR NO YES RESTAURANT 1350 SF HOOTERS MAIN SPACE 2ND FLOOR YES YES RESTAURANT 2058 SF HOOTERS LOBBY 2ND FLOOR YES YES RESTAURANT 150 SF HOOTERS KITCHEN 2ND FLOOR YES YES RESTAURANT 956 SF RESTAURANT 4513 SF MECHANICAL ELEV. EQUIP. ROOFTOP LEVEL NO NO MECHANICAL 88 SF MECHANICAL WELL NON-PUBLIC ACCESS ROOFfOP LEVEL NO NO MECHANICAL 868 SF MECHANICAL 956 SF HOOTERS COVERED BAR / ROOFTOP LEVEL NO YES RESTAURANT 979 SF SEATING HOOTERS LOBBY ROOFfOP LEVEL YES YES RESTAURANT 240 SF HOOTERS UNISEX TOILET ROOM ROOFfOP LEVEL YES YES RESTAURANT 81 SF HOOTERS DRY STORAGE ROOFTOP LEVEL YES NO RESTAURANT 320 SF HOOTERS BEER COOLER ROOFTOP LEVEL YES NO RESTAURANT 248 SF HOOTERS OPEN SEATING ROOFTOP LEVEL NO YES RESTAURANT 1772 SF RESTAURANT 3640 SF Grand total 13404 SF FAR AREA SCHEDULE LEVEL AREA 1 ST FLOOR 3920 SF 2ND FLOOR 3163 SF ROOFTOP LEVEL 889 SF Grand total 7973 SF __— - --- �— - PARKING AREA SCHEDULE LEVEL AREA 1 ST FLOOR 4296 SF 2ND FLOOR 4513 SF ROOFTOP LEVEL 3072 SF Grand total 11880 SF NOTE: SQUARE FOOTAGE CALCULATIONS ARE TO THE EXTERIOR FACE OF EXTERIOR WALLS AND TO CENTER OF TENANT SEPARATION WALLS � �'�L•• - 1 ��0�� c� JOB NUMBER: ? 10162 � W DATE: Q 05/19/11 U � DRAWN BY: Z JAB3 � NO. DESCRIPTION DATE: o .. 12 DESIGN RffINEMEf�ffS 0523,11 13 DESIGN REFINEMENTS 0524.11 14 DESIGN REFINEMENTS 05.25.11 15 SITE REFINEMENTS 05.3p.11 16 DESIGN APPFiOVAL 06.01.11 18 RlUSED RF. TOP 4 IN. 06.16.11 19 DESIGN REFINEMFNTS 0623.11 20 DESIGN REFINEMENTS 07.01.11 z2 oRCCO�e�rs o7.�a.1� c� z � � Z � Q ; J = a- L \ - W _� � -� V - W H - t V � � Q U J J d � � � � Z (_'3 � W 0 2 H � � > � T Q N l�J V Z F- U Q �C F- Z � O " � _ o � �w o Y Qm m J Qw Q O z� w � �¢ � � J Q � MU rn v T � N � N n F— �"� N �Q� �o � I.L � � }o�-o � LL- r N QZ�� o� �W� m Z f� � Q � � ^ _ d SHEET NUMBER � SEAL � Z � a w � Q PRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION � 2995 DREW ST COMMON Date Received: 2/7/2011 10:39:44 AM Baycare Properties, Inc. ZONING DISTRICT: LAND USE: ATLAS PAGE: 291B PLANNER OF RECORD: CL PLANNER: Cate Lee, Planner III CDB Meetin�: August 16, 2011 Case Number: LUP2011-01002 Applicant: Ba�Care Health System, Inc. Address: 2995 Drew Street A�enda Item: E.1 (Related to E2 and E.3) STAFF REPORT LAND USE PLAN AMENDMENT I. GENERAL INFORMATION Request: To amend the present Future Land Use Map designations from Residential Medium (RM) and Residential/Office/Retail (R/O/R) to Residential/Office Limited (R/OL) Location: 2995 Drew Street, located on the southwest corner of Drew Street and Bayview Avenue Site Area: 1,733,252 square feet or 39.79 acres MOL II. BACKGROUND This case involves a 39.79-acre property located at the southwest corner of Drew Street and Bayview Avenue and is owned by the Clearwater Housing Authority. The property is comprised of one p arcel and is currently vacant. From the 1970s to 2004 the subject property contained a public housing project, Jasmine Courts. The request is to change the property's Future Land Use Map designations of Residential Medium (RM) and Residential/Office/Retail (R/O/R) to Residential/Office Limited (R/OL). The applicant, BayCare Health Systems, Inc., has indicated that the intended future use of the property will be corporate offices. A Development Agreement and a request for a rezoning of the property from Medium Density Residential (MDR) and Commercial (C) to Office (0) are being processed concurrently with this case (see REZ2011-01002 and DVA2011-06001). The Development Review Committee reviewed a Flexible Standard Development application (FLS2011- 06011) for Baycare Health System, Inc. at its July 7, 2011 meeting. Issuance of the development order is pending approval of the associated cases and required revisions to the site plan. III. SITE AND VICINITY CHARACTERISTICS A. Site Characteristics The property is currently vacant, with internal roads remaining from the previous use as multi-family housing. Adjacent to the property, to the east, is the Calvary Baptist Church, to the west is a mobile home park, to the north are recreational ball fields, and to the south are mobile homes and an RV park. Community Development Boazd — August 16, 2011 - Case LUP2011-01002 -Page 1 of 8 S:�Planning Department\C D BU.and Use AmendmentsU.and Use Amendments�Drew St 2995 LUP2011-01002 Baycaze Properties, Inc\Staff Report\LUP2011-01002 staffreport.doc B. Surrounding Future Land Use and Zoning Designations � � i � t Direction Land Use FLUM Designation Zoning Atlas Desi nation North: Recreational ball fields Recreation/Open Space Open Space/Recreation (R/OS) and Preservation (OS/R) and Preservation �P) �P East: Church Institutional (I} Institutional (I South: Mobile homes Residential Low Mobile Home Park RV Park Medium (RLIv� and (MHP) and Tourist (T) Resort Facilities High (RFH) West: Mobile homes Residential Low Mobile Home Park Medium (RLIv� (MHP) C. Uses and Intensities Allowed by Present and Requested Future Land Use Designations � � ' •� �• , � � 1 1• � �� , � '. � '• i• i i � ' � � � 1 � � 1 TT• 1 T_ z: 1 7 T T��.��1�. Yrimary Uses: ivioaeraie io nign tcesiaenii�i; �.,uw Lc�,�,�y Density Residential Residential ResidentiaUOffice Equivalent; Office; Retail; Overnight accommodation; PersonalBusiness Services Maximum Density: 15 Dwelling Units 18 Dwelling Units 7.5 Dwelling Units Per Acre Per Acre; 30 Per Acre Overnight Accommodation Units Per Acre Maximum Intensity: FAR 0.50; ISR 0.75 FAR 0.40; ISR 0.85 FAR 0.40; ISR 0.75 Consistent Zoning Medium Density Office (0); Office (0); Low Districts: Residential (MDR); Commercial (C); Medium Density Medium High Medium Density Residential Density Residential Residential (MDR) (LMDR) (MHDR) Communiry Development Boazd — August 16, 2011 - Case LUP20ll-01002 - Page 2 of 8 S:�Planning Department\C D B�L,and Use Amendments�I,and Use Amendments�Drew St 2995 LUP2011-01002 Baycare Properties, Inc\Staff ReportU.UP2011-01002 staffreport.doc IV. REVIEW CRITERIA No amendment to the Comprehensive Plan or Future Land Use Map shall be recommended for approval or receive a final action of approval unless it complies with the standards contained in Section 4-603.F, Community Development Code. A. Consistency with the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan [Section 4-603.F.1] Recommended Findings of Fact.• Applicable goals, objectives and policies of the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan which support the proposed amendments include: Goal A.2 A sufficient variety and amount of Future Land Use categories shall be provided to accommodate public demand and promote infll development. Goal A.4 The City shall not permit development to occur unless an adequate level of service is available to accommodate the impacts of development. Areas in which the impact of existing development exceeds the desired levels of service will be upgraded consistent with the target dates for infrastructure improvements included in the applicable functional plan element. Policy A.6.1.6 Land use decisions in Clearwater shall support the expansion of economic opportunity, the creation of jobs and training opportunities as well as the maintenance of existing industries through establishment of enterprise zones, activity centers and redevelopment areas and by coordination with the Chamber of Commerce, Tourist Development Council and other economic development organizations and agencies. Policy A.6.2.1 On a continuing basis, the Community Development Code and the site plan approval process shall be utilized in promoting infill development and/or planned developments that are compatible. Policy B.1.3.1 Requests for amendment to the Future Land Use Map will have an analysis of traffic impacts. Objective B.1.4 The City shall specifically consider the existing and planned LOS the road network affected by a proposed development, when considering an amendment to the land use map, rezoning, subdivision plat, or site plan approval. Recommended Conclusions of Law The request does not conflict with the goals, objectives and policies of the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan and furthers said plan as indicated in the following. The proposed corporate offices are compatible with the mix of uses in the area and expand economic opportunity in the City. In addition, the proposal does not degrade the level of service for public facilities below the adopted standards (a detailed public facilities analysis follows in this report). Community Development Boazd — August 16, 2011 - Case LUP2011-01002 -Page 3 of 8 S:�Planning Department\C D BU.and Use AmendmentsU.and Use Amendments�Drew St 2995 LUP2011-01002 Baycare Properties, Inc\Staff Report\LUP2011-01002 staffreport.doc B. Consistency with the Countywide Plan Rules Recommended Findings of Fact: Section 2.3.3.4.1 of the Countywide Plan Rules states that the purpose of the Residential/Ofiice Limited (R/OL) future land use classification is to depict those areas of the county that are now developed, or appropriate to be developed, in an office and/or urban low density residential use; and to recognize such areas as well-suited for such limited mixed-use consistent with the surrounding uses, transportation facilities and natural resource characteristics of such areas. Section 2.3.3.4.1 also states that the Residential/Office Limited (R/OL) future land use classification is generally appropriate to those locations where it would serve as a transition from more intensive nonresidential use to low density residential or less intensive public/semipublic use; and in areas where a combination of office and residential use is established or is determined appropriate as a means of encouraging reuse and neighborhood scale conversion. These areas are typically in proximity to and served by the collector and arterial highway network. The subject property is located on the south side of Drew Street (a collector road), between US Highway 19 and McMullen Booth Road (both arterial highways), an area that contains a mix of commercial, office and residential uses. Future use of the subject property, with offices, is consistent with the purposes of the ResidentiaUOffice Limited (R/OL) future land use category and compatible with surrounding properties and the neighborhood. Recommended Conclusions of Law The proposed Future Land Use Map amendment is consistent with the purpose and locational characteristics of the Countywide Plan Rules. G Compatibility with Surrounding Property/Character of the City & Neighborhood [Section 4-603.F.3 and Section 4-603.F.6] Recommended Findings of Fact.• Existing surrounding uses consist of the Calvary Baptist Church and associated buildings, recreational ball fields, and multifamily dwellings. Not immediately adjacent, but in proximity to the subject site, are offices and commercial uses. The future land use designations of surrounding properties include Institutional (I), Recreation/Open Space (R/OS), Preservation (P), Residential Low Medium (RLM) and Resort Facilities High (RFH). The proposed offices on the subject property are compatible with the surrounding properties and neighborhood. The proposed Residential/Office Limited (R/OL) future land use category permits 7.5 dwelling units per acre and a floor area ratio (FAR) of 0.40. The future land use designations of surrounding properties include Institutional (I) (12.6 Dwelling Units Per Acre; �'AR 0.65), Recreation/Open Space (R/OS) (FAR 0.25), Preservation (P) (FAR 0.10), Residential Low Medium (RL1V� (10 Dwelling Units Per Acre; FAR 0.50) and Resort Facilities High (RFH) (30 Dwelling Units Per Acre; FAR 1.2). The Residential/Office Limited (R/OL) future land use classification requested is consistent Community Development Boazd — August I6, 2011 - Case LUP2011-01002 -Page 4 of 8 S:�Planning Department\C D B�I,and Use Amendments�L,and Use Amendments�Drew St 2995 LUP2011-01002 Baycare Properties, Inc\Staff Report\LUP2011-01002 staffreport.doc with the surrounding future land use classifications that exist in the vicinity of the subject property. Recommended Conclusions of Law The proposed future land use designation will allow offices at a density and scale that is consistent with existing institutional and residential uses in the vicinity of the subject property. As such, the proposed amendment will allow development that is in character with the surrounding area. The proposed future land use designation is in character with the overall Future Land Use Map designation in the area. Further, the proposal is compatible with sunounding uses and consistent with the character of the sunounding properties and neighborhood. D. Sufficiency of Public Facilities (Section 4-603.F.5] Recommended Findings of Fact: To assess the sufficiency of public facilities needed to support potential development on the property, the m�imum development potential of the property under the present and requested Future Land Use Map designations was analyzed (see Table 1}. The request for amendment to the Residential/Office Limited (R/OL) Future Land Use Map category would decrease the amount of development potential allowed on the site (see Table 1 below). Table 1. Development Potential for Existing & Proposed FLiTM Designations Site Area 37.09 AC 2.70 AC 39.79 AC (1,615,640 SF) (117,612 SF) (1,733,252 SF) Present FLUM Present FLUM Requested Designation Designation FLUM Net Change «�„ «��„ Designation "R/OL" 556 DUs 48 DUs 298 DUs -306 DUs M�imum g07,820 SF 47,044 SF 693,300 SF -161,564 SF Development 0.50 FAR 0.40 FAR 0.40 FAR -0.05 FAR Abbreviations: FLIJM — Future Land Use Map DUs — Dwelling units AC — Acres FAR — Floor area ratio SF — Square feet Community Development Boazd — August 16, 2011 - Case LUP2011-01002 - Page 5 of 8 S:�Planning Department\C D B�L,and Use Amendments�L,and Use Amendments�Drew St 2995 LUP2011-01002 Baycaze Properties, Inc\Staff Report\LUP2011-01002 staffreport.doc As shown in Table 2 below, the proposed change will not degrade public facilities and services below acceptable levels. Table 2. Public Facilities Level of Service Analysis � '� • � ' � Public Present FLUM Requested Net Capacity Facility/Service present FLUM Designation FLUM Change Available? Designation ��R/O/R" Designation ��RM�� "R/OL „ Streets 3,783 Trips 915 Trips 4,974 Trips 276 Yes Potable Water 144,874 GPD 4,704 GPD 69,330 GPD -80,248 Yes Wastewater 130,386 GPD 3,763 GPD 55,464 GPD -78,685 Yes 1,410 240 Tons/Year 1,872 222 Solid Waste Tons/Year Ton/Year Yes Parkland 0.0 Acres 0.0 Acres 0.0 Acres 0 Yes Public School Facilities3 Yes Elementary 83.4 Students 72 Students 44.7 Students -45.9 Yes Middle 3.36 Students -21.42 School 38.92 Students 20.86 Students Yes High School 55.6 Students 4.8 Students 29.8 Students -30.6 Yes Notes: �_:�_. • r.__.-,. n:_,.n,.,. �,........ �,..... .:4o ua.,., v,.�o 1. ISQJCIl Vll'cIVGId�G Ually Ui�JJ }lci $i.7casc u�w�.� i ��i�.un� �,vuiiiy �.vuaaij�Jra a. uu u w. - Residential Medium (RM) - ResidentiaUOffice/Retail (R/O/R) - ResidentiaUOffice Limited (R/OL) ,. GPD — Gallons per day. �. Based on 4.0 acres of parkland per 1,000 persons and 2.2 persons per unit. 4. Pinellas County School Board student generation rate per unit: - Elementary School: 0.15 students per unit x 1 unit - Middle School: 0.07 students per unit x 1 unit - High School: 0.10 students per unit x 1 unit As shown in Table 3 below, the potential additional maximum daily trips associated with the requested for amendment to the Residential/Office Limited (R/OL) Future Land Use designation would not lower the operating level of service for Drew Street. Communiry Development Board — August 16, 20ll - Case LUP2011-01002 -Page 6 of 8 S:�Planning Department\C D BU.and Use AmendmentsU.and Use Amendments�Drew St 2995 LUP2011-01002 Baycaze Properties, Inc\Staff Report\LUP2011-01002 staff report.doc Table 3: Maximum Potential Traffic Drew Street Existing Current Proposed Net (US 19 to McMullen Booth Road) Conditions FLUMI FLUMZ Tri s Potential Additional Maximum Daily Tri s N/A 4,698 4,974 275 Potential Additional Maximum PM Peak N/A 446 473 26 HourTri s3 Roadway Volume 18,784 23,480 23,758' 275 Roadway Level of Service PM Peak Hour C C C' Ado ted Roadway Level of Service Standard D Peak Hour Abbreviations and Notes: N/A = Not Applicable. FLUM = Future Land Use Map, Clearwater Comprehensive Plan. 1. Based on PPC calculations of 339 trips per day per acre in the ResidentiaUOffice/Retail (R/O/R) future land use category and 102 trips per day per acre in the Residential Medium (RM) future land use category. 2. Based on PPC calculations of 125 trips per day per acre in the Residential/Office Limited (R/OL) future land use category 3. Based on MPO K-factor of 0.095. 4. Source: Pinellas County Metropolitan Planning Organization 2010 Level of Service Report. 5. Based on a comparison between the Pinellas County Metropolitan Planning Organization 2010 Level of Service Report and the 2009 Florida Department of Transportation Quality/Level of Service Handbook. Recommended Conclusions of Law Based upon the findings of fact, it is determined that the traffic generated by the proposed amendment will not result in the degradation of the existing level of service on Drew Street. The Development Agreement proposes several transportation improvements that will enhance the operational efficiency of the intersection at Drew Street and Bayview Avenue, as well as improve site access at the two points of ingress and egress. There is an increase in demand of solid waste service, but there is adequate capacity to accommodate the maximum demand generated by the proposed amendment. Furthermore, potable water, wastewater, parkland, recreation facilities, public school facilities and mass transit will not be affected by the proposed amendment. E. Impact on Natural Resources [Section 4-603.F.5] Recommended Findings of Fact: No wetlands appear to be located on the subject property. The property contained multi- family housing unti12004. Recommended Conclusions of Law Based on current information, no wetlands appear to be located on the subject property. The intent of the applicant is to redevelop the property as offices. The proposed redevelopment is required to be compliant with the City's tree preservation and storm water management requirements. Community Development Boazd — August 16, 2011 - Case LUP2011-01002 -Page 7 of 8 S:�Planning Department\C D B�I,and Use Amendments�I,and Use Amendments�Drew St 2995 LUP2011-01002 Baycare Properties, Inc\Staff ReportU.UP20ll-01002 staff report.doc V. REVIEW PROCEDURE Approval of the Future Land Use Map amendment does not guarantee the right to develop the subject property. The Future Land Use Map amendment is subject to approval by the Pinellas Planning Council and Board of County Commissioners acting as the Countywide Planning Authority. Based on the size of the parcel, review and approval by the Florida Department of Economic Opportunity (Division of Community Planning) is required. The property owner must comply with all laws and ordinances in effect at the time development permits are requested, including transportation concurrency provisions of the Concurrency Management System in Division 9, Community Development Code. VI. RECOMMENDATION Based on the foregoing, the Planning and Development Department recommends the following action: Recommend APPROVAL of the request for Future Land Use Map amendment from the Residential Medium (RM) and Residential/Office/Retail (R/O/R) classifications to the Residential/Office Limited (R/OL) classification. Prepared by Planning & Development Department staff: �%"'v --�� Catherine Lee Playny ar TTT Attachments: Resume Application for Future Land Use Plan Amendment Location Map Aerial Photograph of Site and Vicinity Future Land Use Map Zoning Map Existing Surrounding Use Map Site Photographs Community Development Boazd — August 16, 2011 - Case LUP2011-01002 -Page 8 of 8 S:�Planning Department\C D BU.and Use Amendments�L,and Use Amendments�Drew St 2995 LUP2012-01002 Baycare Properties, Inc\Staff ReportU.UP20] 1-01002 staff report.doc Catherine Lee, LEED Green Associate 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, FL 33756 727-562-4557 catherine.lee(a�mvclearwater.com PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE Planner III, Long Range Division October 201 D to Present Planner II, Long Range Division November 2008 to October 2010 City of Clearwater, Clearwater, Florida Responsible for numerous aspects of the Growth Management Act of Florida such as comprehensive planning, Future Land Use Plan amendments, rezonings, and annexations. Update Community Development Code by Ordinance. Prepare staff reports for the City Council and Community Development Board. Coordinate and manage various projects. Planner I and Planner II, Development Review Division City of Clearrvater, Clearwater, Florida March to October 2008 Provided information to the public concerning the City's Community Development Code, Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan, Beach by Design and general zoning information. Reviewed building plans for compliance with the Community Development Code. Presented Flexible Standard Development applications before the Development Review Committee. • Research Assistant Geography Department, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah September 2007 to January 2008 Contributed research on various land use and planning issues, including locally unwanted land uses and their roles in the American West for Dr. Richard H. Jackson, AICP. • Teaching Assistant Geography Department, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah January 2007 to December 2007 Explained North American land use patterns and concepts to students, including planning history and current practices. Graded student writing and exams, providing feedback for improvement and clarification of planning concepts. Planning Intern City of Port Angeles, Port Angeles, Washington May to August 2007 Assisted citizens at the zoning counter regarding the City's Municipal Code. Performed research related to intergovernmental cooperation, comprehensive plan amendments, and code changes. Presented research fmdings to the Planning Commission. EDUCATION Bachelor of Science in Urban, Rural and Environmental Planning, Brigham Young University, 2007 ASSOCIATION MEMBERSHIP • American Planning Association • LEED Green Associate S:�Planning Department\C D B\Land Use Amendments�I,and Use Amendments\Drew St 2995 LUP2011-01002 Baycare Properties, Inc\Maps\LUP,REZ201 1-01 002,DVA2011-06001 Location Map.doc � � ;t d �� ;' :"' � Ef �,,, � � 1 _ �l1�IIIt� , • . �rs _ �. _ .� 1 � � ± sF',. t r .' R : : - - : � _ ., a � �► • '�r � . . . . . - . . _ w. ' . � .,, .� � 4,� �". �, -., . a ^ . . .. ,. - `r . � , .. . _ � i , —"`� �� f �.�" " z �'.�.,{ i £ � . X�W��.�� ;� o ,— �,t � • � %,� � ,,�•,, -; �„ � '�" ��s . � ' � � � . i� �i 1 __ c`�a.� <. �. ^5�� '� * f t �*',- �.. ; �, �� / •^' ' � ' : . � � . � tr� , • � f • e� t . ,_� r ` "; }� � ��, r r�"�! , ti �. � � i+� � a ' "�" i; '� o ,. '"} ...i � t.� tc " z � y� 6 �,.' � .�" ` , .7 � � � ,�� : � ,� , � � ,� t�, � �� :� S$�� M1 � e aA . ��4 1� I , II '. = J.�9Y �i � , �..I�z � '� ��+ N ,i'7 Vi,�.� T ' �, ��f � ♦ ns.mMb•� I� � . , . � � � � i ♦ , �f '. �� F.� - � , ' �� ;"",�' 'f .�;.;....t i � y } �s \ � � 5� �^ , f ;' �� - � ::- �.., , � . � ��,�':: �'� !� �'� �,f �' �'x � � � �i �9��` r_��'r :. i k � S^ Rx l � "5 1 � 1 1. � �,� , i!,�.,k � +�'At � � 1 � � . a' � „z. ,�� '.,f" �. , � . � �f� a ia µ . �. q ti � � i ?F e� �n y . . y k t� �/ t `� `� . �_i� A� �1 � �,�, S � � '� � � a �� . � .I � � � . i. . � � ,� �.,� _.� �� t$Sr�� . . � �-��` • ;j# �.-. � fP.� �� . .- .._ .. p � .�• .r`' • J ' . � ..�� '�:: . 'Y: �� . 5. .� ' , r � � � ' � � • � �� o .. � , � ., ".,;3 ��:. �',�`� ' � ..�f r . � �1 Y�`�� .:'�`�ks�� ' f � •` � �� . w 1 R ! , �! "3�, � * ..1 �4 e _ �r Y . 1 i` 1 �. ; r, ;,,. �„ �" ,.,,� �c..��. p �'S' ' . j� . �n: � �r , — � � ��' , �` _ �. � � � r: ��W ►'�i+ � � i � +' ,4 �� .�v.� / � �� . �,� � r � ' R� . �� "t-"i�l ... ,�' i,' --� s,,, , �J :,,�,�.._.... f - 1::, b '—� ?�' �, '-� ..� � - ,� � �;,, =�.�—{ �� `' � .. �� ' �'� �'-�� ' � � �f AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH Owner: Clearwater Housing Authority Case: Applicant: BayCare Health System, Inc. � Site: 2995 Drew Street From To: Land Use RM and R/O/R R/OL Properfy Size(Acres): Zoning PIN MDR and C O f � LUP/REZ2011-01002 DVA201 1-06001 39.79 1 7-29-1 6-00000-1 1 0-01 00 Atlas Page: 291 B S:\Planning Department\C D B\Land Use Amendments\Land Use AmendmentslDrew St 2995 LUP20] ]-01002 Baycare Properties, Inc\Maps\LUP,REZ20 1 1-01002,DVA2011-06001 Aerial Photograph.doc S:�Planning Department\C D B\Land Use Amendments\Land Use Amendments\Drew St 2995 LUP201 1-0 1 002 Baycare Properties, Inc�Maps\LUP,REZ201 1-01 002,DVA2011-06001 Future Land Use Map.doc °o ' N � N y N o < 2 MDR OS/R ---- -- � � N N M M . ..__._._...... . ��.��1J�fJl_�l�llllJ■. ■�/I.��li�i��.��.• ��.��u��a�� _ BERMUDA 0 � + v Q�e O �Q'� ` � •'• r y HP � � � z W� � DR N I ])°`' � � y � L N � V � �. o' N �O�'!J'iR O O O O LEEWARD ISLE " �o " `" "' �' ' 13 � — i%��n►rii k vi _° -�, - � .� O "p"i.�__'_� �'1_-f�_M-i � �,.� ' � . � _ _O �O9 B� c�°� n. �r�j I M ��. _•.. �� ---im� _112� '. i a� • 115 ;oo �, . 72Q'►) � DR �� _YNN - ' ,ze "' � ° ° ,, . . .: , _ _ R 1VIHP T ._ � ._. �, � ' "' � . zo, � .. .•.� p�� .22 ��, 225 2� 209_ '�� o `" ' - �.i213 _22�i'�`b �_• .7. i � ZONING MAP Owner: Clearwater Housing Authority Case: LUP/REZ201 1-01 002 Applicant: BayCare Health System, Inc. DVA201 1-06001 Site: 2995 Drew Street Properfy 39.79 Size (Acres) : Land Use Zoning PIN: 17-29-16-00000-110-0100 From : RM and R/O/R MDR and C To: R/OL O Atlas Page: 291 B S:�Planning Department\C D B\Land Use Amendments\Land Use .Amendments\Drew St 2995 LUP2011-01002 Baycare Properties, Inc\Maps\LUP,REZ2011-01002,DVA2011-06001 Zoning Map.doc 0 e d > —� N � � �z:mo j a � �' � N �O a � Z 99< R�rci -- _ Multi-Family Recreational Residential Recreational ball fields w� ball�elds 0 I N � � a� O Oz.e n��., N � � STREET STftEET DREW BERMUDA Ch urch Mobile H�ime Park � � - � Q -I- -� �,�o , �' � , � , � g J p,� � O L I Q--�-- -- � z �. �„ _�_T---- �� W � � , � O L�_' � � z Q ' �• ' ' ,- 2 W � I� m F� � - y � ; � � � N N aEV[urvo Q Q �. � V � � � LEEWARD ISLE �o ° ° � C 13 . '� � .., ■��■��■ '�N - .. ,.r � � ,8� �., � Mobile � 9 � ,�,...� _� ,, . s �+ RV Park � �, N w.- ,- i --- -� Home � ,a s e �� ,'' ` eFamil Par k ,s A�,., nz � I., .� �_ L� ential y i:':�`: � ��' �. L - `� 2 � a r—� € z I„ o�e. •g �'��'3, , �, � � `_� oo �, - „e n�K� 'I � 4 4 R TENHESSEEt,�. �•� AVENUE EXISTING SURROUNDING USES MAP Owner: Clearwater Housing Authority Case: LUP/REZ201 1-01002 Applicant: BayCare Health S stem, Inc. DVA201 1-06001 Site: 2995 Drew Street Properfy 39.79 Size (Acres) : Land Use Zoning P I N : 17-29-16-00000-110-0100 From : RM and R/O/R MDR and C To: R/OL 0 Atlas Page: 291 B S:�Planning Department\C D B\Land Use Amendments\Land Use Amendments\Drew St 2995 LUP201 I-OI002 Baycare Properties, Inc\Maps\LUP,REZ20 1 1-01002,DVA2011-06001 Existing Surrounding Uses Map.doc �.:'� , a :,'s.. . . � I�e.�'.:: . '.. . a_:�........:.... .....__..� View looking south at the subject property, 2995 Drew Street \. .�, e �. � �� South of the subject property, on Bayview Avenue I__ ,_-- � __ . _ _ ------ - � East of the subject property, on Drew Street, Calvary Christian High School . �, rt�'�:fY .. . . � 5 { ! i� i �)� 6 c �, �. `-A"�.� �a i ��. . . �.�„ . ..,��„_.... ,.:, , , ��...:.,,3. _ ,. � .... .. . ...... .. . . . +sr�hm^u°s+ Across Drew Street, to north of the subject property, Eddie C. Moore Complex West of the subject property, on Drew Street East of the subject property, on Drew Street, Calvary Baptist Church LUP2011-01002, REZ2011-01002 and DVA2011-06001 Baycare Health System, Inc. 2995 Drew Street 0 { �, �{ B . , 'e �a��',�'`.�. � � ,, ��o-,��"`� `� `*� ; ``^. �F "s°c"*,. . �'`,.,_ . .. View looking westerly along Drew Street View looking northerly along Bayview Avenue View looking south at "Drive A" from Drew Street . . . '.�j (1�;� � . � M ,� m .c < ,� �{� � ' s^^^��;. ; n ,.c. s ' z. �� `j¢ .. �� . .� E� � � � � ' "�� _ >$ �.4r.. � ,. , .# ' ..xA � .av �i�AiiSPd . , ��. View looking easterly along Drew Street � View looking southerly along Bayview Avenue .: � d�t. � .a� �; ,�- r ,a• '- ,� :�r � � � �� a� . , . -�� '` � �` . . . _ ., . __ . . .. . �. _ . . .. .�.--�c;` ... View looking west at "Drive B" from Bayview Avenue LUP2011-01002, REZ2011-01002 and DVA2011-06001 Baycare Health System, Inc. 2995 Drew Street � � 2995 DREW ST CUMMON Date Received: 1/31/2011 3:09:13 PM Baycare Properties ZONING DISTRICT: LAND USE: ATLAS PAGE: 291B PLANNER OF RECORD: CL PLANNER: Cate Lee, Planner III CDB Meetin�: Au�ust 16, 2011 Case Number: REZ2011-01002 Applicant: BavCare Health Svstem, Inc. Address: 2995 Drew Street A�enda Item: E.2 (Related to E.1 and E.3) STAFF REPORT ZONING ATLAS AMENDMENT I. GENERAL INFORMATION Request: To amend the Zoning Atlas designation from the Medium Density Residential (MDR) and Commercial (C) Districts to the Office (0) District Location: 2995 Drew Street, located on the southwest corner of Drew Street and Bayview Avenue Site Area: 1,733,252 square feet or 39.79 acres MOL II. BACKGROUND This case involves a 39.79-acre property located at the southwest corner of Drew Street and Bayview Avenue and is owned by the Clearwater Housing Authority. The property is comprised of one p arcel and is currently vacant. From the 19�Os to 2004 the subject property contained a public housing project, Jasmine Courts. The request is to change the property's Zoning Atlas designations of Medium Density RPC;�1Pr,tial (Mi�RI and Commercial (Cl to Office (Ol. A Develonment Agreement and a request for a future land use amendment of the properiy from Residential Medium (RM) and Residential/Office/Retail (R/O/R) to Residential/Office Limited (R/OL) are being processed concurrently with this case (see LUP2011-01002 and DVA2011-06001). III. SITE AND VICINITY CHARACTERISTICS A. Site Characteristics The subject property is cunently vacant, with internal roads remaining from the previous multi-family housing use. Adjacent to the property, to the east, is the Calvary Baptist Church, to the west is a mobile home park, to the north are recreational ball fields, and to the south are mobile homes and an RV park. Communiry Development Board — August 16, 2011 - Case REZ2011-01002 -Page 1 of 7 S:�Planning Department\C D B�Zoning Atlas Amendments�REZ 2011�Drew St 2995 REZ201 I-01002 Baycaze Properties, Inc\Staff Report�REZ2011-01002 StaffReport.docx B. Surrounding Future Land Use and Zoning Designations i �i� � Direction Land Use FLUM Designation Zoning Atlas Desi nation North: Recreational ball fields Recreation/Open Space Open Space/Recreation (R/OS) and Preservation (OS/R) and Preservation �p) �P) East: Church Institutional (I) Institutional (I) South: Mobile homes Residential Low Mobile Home Park RV Park Medium (RLIvn and (MHP) and Tourist (T) Resort Facilities High (RFH West: Mobile homes Residential Low Mobile Home Park Medium (RLIv� (MHP) IV. REVIEW CRITERIA No amendment to the Zoning Atlas shall be recommended for approval or receive a final action of approval unless it complies with the standards contained in Section 4-602.F, Community Development Code. A. Consistency of Development with the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan and (:ommunity llevelopment t;ode and t;ity Kegulations �aection 4-6U1.1+.1 and 4- 602.F.2] Recommended Findings of Fact: Applicable goals, objectives and policies of the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan which support the proposed amendments include: Goal A.2 A sufiicient variety and amount of Future Land Use categories shall be provided to accommodate public demand and promote infill development. Goal A.4 The City shall not permit development to occur unless an adequate level of service is available to accommodate the impacts of development. Areas in which the impact of existing development exceeds the desired levels of service will be upgraded consistent with the target dates for infrastructure improvements included in the applicable functional plan element. Policy A.6.1.6 Land use decisions in Clearwater shall support the expansion of economic opportunity, the creation of jobs and training opportunities as well as the maintenance of existing industries through establishment of enterprise zones, activity centers and redevelopment areas and by coordination with the Chamber of Commerce, Tourist Development Council and other economic development arganizations and agencies. Community Development Board — August 16, 2011 - Case REZ2011-01002 -Page 2 of 7 S:�Planning Department\C D B�Zoning Atlas Amendments�REZ 2011�Drew St 2995 REZ2011-01002 Baycare Properties, Inc\Staff Report�REZ2011-01002 StaffReport.docx Policy A.6.2.1 On a continuing basis, the Community Development Code and the site plan approval process shall be utilized in promoting infill development and/or planned developments that are compatible. Objective B.1.4 The City shall specifically consider the existing and planned LOS the road network affected by a proposed development, when considering an amendment to the land use map, rezoning, subdivision plat, or site plan approval. Recommended Conclusions of Law The request does not conflict with the goals, objectives and policies of the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan and furthers said plan as indicated in the following. The proposed corporate offices are compatible with the mix of uses in the area and expand economic opportunity in the City. In addition, the proposal does not degrade the level of service for public facilities below the adopted standards (a detailed public facilities analysis follows in this report). B. Compatibility with Surrounding Property/Character of the City & Neighborhood [Sections 4-602.F.3 and 4-602.F.4] Existing surrounding uses consist of the Calvary Baptist Church and associated buildings, recreational ball fields, and multifamily dwellings. Not immediately adjacent, but in proximity to the subject site, are offices and commercial uses. The zoning designations of surrounding properties include Institutional (I), Open Space/Recreation (OS/R), Preservation (P), Mobile Home Park (MHP) and Tourist (T). The proposed offices on the subject property are compatible with the sunounding properties and neighborhood. The proposed Office (0) District primarily permits offices, parks and recreation facilities, places of worship and schools. All of these uses are in the general vicinity of the subject parcel, two of which are immediately adjacent (parks and recreation facilities and places of worship). The Office (0) zoning district requested is consistent with the surrounding zoning districts that exist in the vicinity of the subject property. The proposed zoning district will allow offices at a density and scale that is consistent with existing institutional and residential uses in the vicinity of the subject property. As such, the proposed amendment will allow development that is in character with the surrounding area. Recommended Conclusions of Law The proposed Zoning Atlas designation is in character with the overall Zoning Atlas designations in the area. Further, the proposal is compatible with surrounding uses and consistent with the character of the surrounding properties and neighborhood. C. Sufficiency of Public Facilities [Section 4-602.F.5] Recommended Findings of Fact: To assess the sufficiency of public facilities needed to support potential development on the property, the maximum development potential of the property under the present and Community Development Board — August 16, 2011 - Case REZ2011-01002 -Page 3 of 7 S:�Planning Department\C D B�Zoning Atlas Amendments�REZ 2011�Drew St 2995 REZ201 I-01002 Baycaze Properties, Inc\Staff Report�REZ201 l -01002 Staff Report.docx requested Future Land Use Map designations was analyzed (see Table 1). The request for amendment to the Residential/Office Limited (R/OL) Future Land Use Map category would allow a decrease in the number of possible dwelling units by 306 and decreases the amount of nonresidential floor area permitted by 161,564 square feet on the subject property. Table 1. Development Potential for Existing & Proposed FLUM Designations Site Area 37.09 AC 2.70 AC 39.79 AC (1,615,640 SF) (117,612 SF) (1,733,252 SF) Present FLUM Present FLUM Requested Designation Designation FLUM Net Change «�„ «��„ Designation "R/OL" 556 DUs 48 DUs 298 DUs -306 DUs Maximum g07,820 SF 47,044 SF 693,300 SF -161,564 SF Development 0.50 FAR 0.40 FAR 0.40 FAR -0.05 FAR Abbreviations: FLUM — Future Land Use Map DUs — Dwelling units AC — Acres FAR — Floor area ratio SF — Square feet The proposed change in designations would allow a decrease in the number of dwelling units and amount of allowable Floor Area Ratio (thus a decrease in square footage). The current Medium Density Residential (MDR) district primarily permits attached and rlPtar_,hPrl riwPllino�; commi�nity resiciential hpme� �n�i sc1��15. The current Commercial (C) district primarily permits offices, overnight accommodations, restaurants and retail sales and services. The proposed Office (0) District primarily permits offices, parks and recreation facilities, places of worship and schools. Community Development Boazd — August I6, 2011 - Case REZ2011-01002 -Page 4 of 7 S:�Planning Department\C D B�Zoning Atlas Amendments�REZ 2011�Drew St 2995 REZ201 1-01 002 Baycaze Properties, Inc\Staff ReportUZEZ20ll-01002 StaffReport.docx Table 2. Public Facilities Level of Service Analysis �� . � � � Public Present FLUM Requested Net Capacity Facility/Service Present FLLTM Designation FLUM Change Available? Designation ��R/O/R" Designation ��RM�� °°R/OL " Streets 3,783 Trips 915 Trips 4,974 Trips 276 Yes Potable Water 144,874 GPD 4,704 GPD 69,330 GPD -80,248 Yes Wastewater 130,386 GPD 3,763 GPD 55,464 GPD -78,685 Yes 1,410 240 Tons/Year 1,872 222 Solid Waste Tons/Year Ton/Year Yes Parkland 0.0 Acres 0.0 Acres 0.0 Acres 0 Yes Public School Facilities3 Yes Elementary 83.4 Students 7.2 Students 44.7 Students -45.9 Yes Middle 3.36 Students -21.42 School 38.92 Students 20.86 Students Yes High School 55.6 Students 4.8 Students 29.8 Students -30.6 Yes NoteS: 1. Based on average daily trips per acreage figure, Pinellas County Countywide Plan Rules. - i:.°.5�.'�.:.^..,31 1��1��m ;RTA� - ResidentiallOffice/Retail (R/O/R) - ResidentiaUOffice Limited (R/OL) 2. GPD — Gallons per day. 3. Based on 4.0 acres of parkland per 1,000 persons and 2.2 persons per unit. 4. Pinellas County School Board student generation rate per unit: - Elementary School: 0.15 students per unit x 1 unit - Middle School: 0.07 students per unit x 1 unit High School: 0.10 students per unit x 1 unit The Trip Generation Comparison by Zoning Atlas Designation in Table 3 below indicates the estimated trip generation for specific uses allowed in the current and proposed zoning districts based on the Institute of Transportation Engineer's (ITE) Trip Generation 8ry Edition. The table shows that while there would be a net increase in PM Peak Trips for a General Office Building, allowed in the proposed Office (0) District, there would be a net decrease in PM Peak Trips for the development proposed in the current Development Agreement case (see DVA2011-06001), Corporate Headquarters Office Building. The Development Agreement proposes several transportation improvements that will enhance the operational efficiency of the intersection at Drew Street and Bayview Avenue, as well as improve site access at the two points of ingress and egress. Community Development Boazd — August 16, 2011 - Case REZ201 I-01002 -Page 5 of 7 S:�Planning Department\C D B�Zoning Atlas Amendments�REZ 2011�Drew St 2995 REZ2011-01002 Baycare Properties, Inc\Staff Report�REZ2011-01002 Staff Report.docx Table 3: Trip Generation Comparison by Zoning Atlas Designation PM Net Development A�g' C ange Peak PM peak Change Land Use p o t e n t i a l Daily A v g D a i l y Trips T r i p s PM Trips Trips A�g Peak Rate Tri s Existin Desi nation: Commercial District Specialty Retail Center 47,044 SF 2,085 N/A 5.02 236 N/A (4432 trips/1,000 SF GFA Existin Desi nation: Medium Densi Residential District Single-Family Detached 556 DU 5,320 N/A 1.02 567 N/A Housing2 (9.57 trips/unit) Low-Rise Apartment 556 DU 3,664 N/A 0.62 344 N/A 6.59 tri s/unit Pro osed Desi nation: Office District General Office Building 693,300 SF 7,633 228 1.49 1,033 230 (11.01 trips/1,000 SF GFA) Permitted Use throu h Develo ment A reement VA2011-06001 Corporate Headquarters 300,000 SF 2,394 -5,011 1.40 420 -383 Office Building5 (7.98 tri s/1,000 SF GFA Abbreviations and Notes: N/A = Not Applicable. SF = Square Feet GFA = Gross Floor Area 1. Institute of Transportation Engineer's Trip Generation 8th Edition Land Use 814. 2. Institute of Transportation Engineer's Trip Generation 8th Edition Land Use 210. 3. Institute of Transportation Engineer's Trip Generation 8th Edition Land Use 22l . 4. Institute of Transportation Engineer's Trip Generation 8th Edition Land Use 710. 5. Institute of Transportation Engineer's Trip Generation 8th Edition Land Use 714. 6. Total gross floor area ratio permitted by the underlying R/O/R Future Land Use Map category is 0.40. 7. Total dwelling units permitted by the underlying RM Future Land Use Map category is 15 units per acre. 8. Total dwelling units permitted by the underlying RM Future Land Use Map category is 15 units per acre. 9. Total gross floor azea ratio permitted by �e underlying R/OL Future Land Use Map category is 0.40. ] 0. DVA2011-06001 limits development of the subject site to 300,000 square feet of office space. Recommended Conclusions of Law Based upon the findings of fact, it its determined that the traffic generated by the proposed amendment will not result in the degradation of the existing level of service on Drew Street. There is an increase in demand of solid waste service, but there is adequate capacity to accommodate the maximum demand generated by the proposed amendment. Furthermore, potable water, wastewater, parkland, recreation facilities, public school facilities and mass transit will not be affected by the proposed amendment. Community Development Board — August 16, 2011 - Case REZ201 I-01002 -Page 6 of 7 S:�Planning Department\C D B�Zoning Atlas Amendments�REZ 201 I�Drew St 2995 REZ201 1-0 1 002 Baycare Properties, Inc\Staff Report�REZ201 1-0 1 002 StaffReport.docx D. Location of District Boundaries [Section 4-602.F.6] Recommended Findings of Fact: The location of the proposed Office (0) District boundaries is consistent with the boundaries of the subject property. The proposed Office (O} District boundaries would consolidate the subject property into a single zoning district. The proposed Office (0) District is compatible with the place of worship use to the east, multi-family uses to the west and south and parks and recreation facilities use to the north. Recommended Conclusions of Law The district boundaries are appropriately drawn in regard to location and classifications of streets, ownership lines, existing improvements and the natural environment. V. REVIEW PROCEDURE Approval of the Zoning Atlas amendment does not guarantee the right to develop the subject property. The property owner must comply with all laws and ordinances in effect at the time development permits are requested, including transportation concurrency provisions of the Concurrency Management System in Division 9, Community Development Code. VI. RECOMMENDATION Based on the foregoing, the Planning and Development Department recommends the following action: Recommend APPROVAL of the request for Zoning Atlas amendment from the Medium Density Residential (MDR) and Commercial (C) districts to the Office (0) District. . ��'! �,. Prepared by Planning & Development Department staff: �.�, �' Catherine Lee Planner III Attachments: Resume Application for Future Land Use Plan Amendment Location Map Aerial Photograph of Site and Vicinity Future Land Use Map Zoning Map Existing Surrounding Use Map Site Photographs Community Development Boazd — August 16, 201 I- Case REZ2011-01002 -Page 7 of? S:�Planning Department\C D B�Zoning Atlas Amendments�REZ 2011�Drew St 2995 REZ2011-01002 Baycare Properties, Inc\Staff Report�REZ2011-01002 StaffReport.docx M CITY OF CLEARWATER S��' r�, APPLICATION FOR � '�� a COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT a � qq�A�� (INCLUDIN pLANNING DEPARTMENT ENDMENT) MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, 2"d FLOOR PHONE (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4576 APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNERS, AND AGENT INFORMATION: APPLICANT NAME: MAILING ADDRESS: Bay Care Health System, Inc. (Attn: James Orr) 8452-118th Avenue North, Largo, Florida 33773 PHONE NUMBER: 727-394-6576 FAX NUMBER: Clearwater Housing Authority (Attn: Jacqueline Rivera, CEO) PROPERTY OWNERS: P. O. Box 960, C1eaLwater, FL 33757-0960 (List all owners) . ng , s AGENTNAME: �TOrll'1SOri� Pope, Bokor, Ruppel & Burns, LLP MAILING ADDRESS: PHONE NUMBER: 911 Chestnut Street, Cleazwater, FL 33756 727-461-1818 .727-462-0365 FAX NUMBER: SITE INFORMATION: 2985 and 2995 Drew Street LOCATION: SOUt.Y1W2St corner of Drew Street and Bayview Avenue STREET ADDRESS: VaCc"�rit LEGAL DESCRIPTION: See �Llblt ��A�� attached. PARCEI NUMBER: SIZE OF SITE: FUTURELAND USE CLASSIFICATION: 17-29-16-00000-110-0100 39.79. acres m.o.l. PRESENT: ZONING CLASSIFICATION: PRESENT PROPOSED TEXT AMENDMENT (use additional paper if necessary) RM and R/O/R NIDR and C N/A I(We), the undersigned, acknowledge that all representations made in this application are true and accurate to the best of my/(our) knowledge Si ure of property owner or representative E. D. Armstrong III, Esquire Signature of property owner or representative R/OL REQUESTED: � REQUESTED: STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS Sw�y and subscribed before me this ��`— day of , A.D., ��l to me by E. ong , who is personally known ��b a�. C� . Not public .......�..r.� my ommission expires: ,,,,,,,, ; �ti:�::r�� : JAYNE E. SEARS :,: � :�; Commission # DD 907040 Bonded Thru Troy Fan Insu2nc¢ 800.3857019 CITY OF CLEARWATER APPLICATION FOR ZOIVING ATLAS AMENDMENT PLANNING DEPARTMENT MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, 2"d FLOOR PHONE (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4576 APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNERS, AND AGENT INFORMATION: BayCare Health System, Inc. (Attn: James Orr) APPLICANT NAME: MAILINGADDRESS: 8452—�-1HtY1 AVP_IlUe NOY'tl'1� IcZI'CfO� Florida 33773 PHONE NUMBER: 727-394-6576 FAX NUMBER: Clearwater Housing Authority (Attn: Jacx�ueline Rivera, CEO) PROPERTY OWNERS: P. O. Box 960, Clearwater, FL 33757-0960 (List all owners) E. D. Armstrong III, Esquire and AGENT NAME: � i i r MAILWG ADDRESS: 911 C�7�-'StT1Ut S�'�t � Cleazwater, FL 33756 727-4ti1-1R1R ��-a��-n�� PHONE NUMBER: FAX NUMBER: 2985 and 2995 Drew Street SITE INFORMATION: �uthwest corner of Drew Street and Bayview Avenue STREET ADDRESS: V1C3Tlt LEGAL DESCR�PTION: �e EXhl�lt ��A�� attached. PARCEL NUMBER: EXISTING ZONING: 17-29-16-00000-110-0100 37.09 acres zoned "NIDR" + 2,7 acres zoned "C" PROPOSED ZONING: Off1Ce ( ��0�� LAND USE PLAN Ciirrently RM and O cwssiFicATiorv: 1�zesting Residential Office Limited R/OL SIZE OF SITE: 39.:79 acres m.o, l REASON FOR REQUEST: �OPOS2(3 C�2VE?ZOplTlerit of BayCare cozporate headquarters I, the undersigned, acknowledge that all representations made in this application are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge. S' ature of property owner or representative E. D. Azmstrong IIi, Esquire STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS �iyn to and subscribed before me this.�,� �day of A.D.,� GU11 to me and/or by °ng I , who is personally known�� x� �. Notary p ic, my com ission expires: Page 1 of 2 JAYNE E. SEARS Bonded iTni Troy fain I�urance 800.385)019 N. AFFIDAVIT TO AUTHORIZE AGENT: 1. Provlde names of ail propeRy owners on deed — PRINT tull nart�es: Gl.eazwater Housing Authority, a non-profit oorporate body and•politic �u, °s . 2. That (I am/we are) the owner(s) and rewrd title holder(s} of the following described property (address or general bcation): Parcel No. 17-29-16-00000-110-0100 3. That this property constitutes the property ior which a request for a: {describe req�st) Zoning Atlas Amer�ent and 4. That the undersigned thas/have) appoirtted and (doesldo) appoint: E.- D. �rtt4strong III, E��i re, an�d Johnson, Pope, Bokor, Ru}�pel & Bu�s, LLP 911 Chestnut Street, Q�a�.i�, FL 33756 as (histtheir) agent(s) to execute any pettpons or other documents necessary to effect such petidon; 5. That this affidavit has been executed to induce the Ciry of Clearvvater, Fbrida to consider and act on the above described property; 6. That slte visiis to the property are necessary by City representalives in orcler to process this application and the owner authwizes City representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application; 7. That (Ihve), the undersigned authority, hereby ceriify that the foregoing is true and cotrect. Cleazwater Hpusing Authority Property Owner - P�opeAy , � � � �t�-' Property Owner % ; Property, Owne� - t.��cque Riv�era, C� STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS Before me the undersigned, an officer duly commissfoned by the laws of the State of Florida, on this �� day of MSy 2�11 �rsonally appeared JacSqueline R1V�Y'1� Cf7�* Who having been first duly swom Deposes and says that he/she iufly understands the contents of the affidavit that he/she signed. * of Cleaiwater Hausing Authority ��tnR � Pu•�C� I�fll� � � .. � �. *� * MY COI�MISSION N EE 067464 r'"�=��L-''" %�i� ,�r � EXPIRES: febNary 24, 2015 Notary Pub'c Signat re F Bwided iluu Bu 1� %a �% 1s Notary be°Fa�/Stamp ��S My Commission Expires: �,�c /�-� f C:�Documents and SerifngsWerek.fergusonlDesktoplplanning dept forms � ��:�i� : ��.�.� The Northeast '/ of the Northeast '/4 of Section 17, Township 29 South, Range 16 East, Pinellas County, Florida; less and except the North 50 feet thereof for right-of-way for Drew Street; also less and except the East 33 feet thereof for right-of-way for Bayview Boulevard. BAYCARE CORPORATE HQ LAND USE AMENDMENT / REZONING NARRATIVE SUMMARY OWNER: Clearwater Housing Authority PO Box 960 Clearwater, F133757-0960 Applicant/Contract Purchaser/Authorized Representative: BayCare Health System, Inc. (a Florida Corporation) 8452 — 118�' Avenue North Largo, FL 33773 Attn: James Orr Authorized Representative: Authorized Representative: Robert Pergolizzi, AICP/PTP Mr. Ed Armstrong, Esq. Gulf Coast Consulting, Inc. Johnson, Pope, Bokor, Ruppel & Burns, LLP 13825 Icot Boulevard, Suite 605 911 Chestnut Street Clearwater, Fl 33760 Clearwater, F133756 I. INTRODUCTION The subject property consists of 39.79 acres which are located on the south side of Drew Street west of Bayview Avenue in the City of Clearwater. The property is vacant and had been previously developed with apartments. BayCare is considering developing its corporate headquarters and relocating several employees from various locations in the Tampa Bay area into a unified campus. To develop the property with office uses the applicants seek to amend the land use plan for approximately Residential Medium (RM) and Residential/Office/Retail (R/O!R) to Residential/Office Limited (R/OL) and to rezone the site from Medium Density Residential (MDR and Commercial (C) to Office (0). This application is accompanied by a Development Agreement including a Master Plan for the property. II. LAND USE / ZONING The property in question has multiple land use designations and zoning classifications. EXISTING Parcel ID# Size Land Use Zoninp Part of 17/29/16/00000/110/0100 37.09 acres RM MDR Part of 17/29/16/00000/110/0100 2.70 acres R/O/R C TOTAL 39.79 acres The Drew Street corridor between US 19 and McMullen Booth Road contains a mixture of uses including Commercial General (CG), ResidentiaUOffice General (R/OG), Industrial Limited (IL), Residential Low Medium (RLM), Institutional (I), and Recreation/Open Space (R/OS. The proposed land use and zoning are outlined below: PROPOSED Parcel ID# Size Land Use ZoninQ Part of 17/29/16/00000/110/0100 37.09 acres R/OL O Part of 17/29/16/00000/110/0100 2.70 acres R/OL O TOTAL 39.79 acres Surrounding Uses around the subject property: North: Open space on land having a Recreation/Open Space (R/OS) land use designation and Open Space/Recreation (O/SR zoning, containing recreational fields.) South: Mobile home park on land having RLM land use, and MHP zoning, and RV park on land having RFH land use and T(tourist) zoning. East: Calvary Baptist Church on land having Institutional (I) land use and Institutional (I) zoning. West: Mobile home park on land having RLM land use and MHP zoning, west of Hampton Road, office uses and light manufacturing uses on land having IL land use and Industrial Research & Technology (IRT) zoning in the City of Clearwater. Given the mixture of uses, the establishment of a single user office compl�x is reasonable and can be adequately buffered from nearby residential uses by adhering to the standards set forth in the Community Development Code. III. TRANSPORTATION According to Pinellas Planning Council (PPC) criteria the net traffic impact of the plan amendment would be only 268 daily trips as calculated below: Current FLUM Desi nation: 37.09 acres RM @ 96 daily trips/acre = 3,560 daily trips 2.7 acres R/O/R (� 336 daily.trips/acre = 907 daily trips Total = 4,467 daily trips Proposed FLUM Desi na� tion: 39.79 acres R/OL @ 119 daily trips/acre = 4,735 daily trips 2 According to the MPO 2010 Level of Service Report, the segment of Drew Street between U.S. 19 and McMullen Booth Road is reported to operate at Level of Service (LOS) C carrying 18,784 vehicles per day. Capacity is available to support the Land Use Plan Amendment. Furthermore, the applicant anticipates up to 300,000 square feet of office space would be constructed. A detailed traffic analysis was prepared that demonstrates acceptable levels of service along Drew Street will be maintained. Based on ITE Trip Generation, 8`�' Edition, a 300,000 square foot corporate headquarters facility would generate 2,394 daily trips of which 447 trips would occur during the AM peak hour and 420 trips would occur during the PM peak hour. Access to Drew Street is available through a median opening near the western end of the site that could be used for the main project access. Secondary access could be taken via Bayview Avenue. Minor roadway improvements may be necessary to provide safe access. PSTA has several bus routes along Drew Street, so the area is well served by mass-transit. In addition, the nearby recreational trail provides alternate means of access to the area for increased pedestrian usage. IV. AVAILABILITY OF PUBLIC UTILITIES Potable water and sanitary sewer appear to be available to the site. Based on site observation and inspection of the Utility atlas maps obtained from the City of Clearwater, existing water and sewer facilities are available within and immediately adjacent to the site as follows: potable water lines are located within Bayview Avenue; sanitary sewer lines are located within Bayview Avenue, Drew Street, and within the site; reclaimed water lines (for irrigation) are located within Drew Street; and storm-water drainage pipes are located within Bayview Avenue and Drew Street as well as throughout the site. In addition, Clearwater Gas has natural gas lines within Bayview Avenue. It is apparent that power and cable facilities are also located throughout this Drew Street conidor. In summary all utilities appear to be readily available to serve this site. Therefore, sufficient public facilities are available to serve the property. V. OTHER INFORMATION The site is located in a NON-Hurricane Evacuation Zone and is not located within a 100- year floodplain. The consolidation of administrative and back-office functions would bring 500 to 1500 jobs to the City of Clearwater in an area slated for economic redevelopment by the City of Clearwater. The site is large enough to accommodate up to 300,000 square feet of building floor area, associated parking and roadways, while maintaining a large amount of open space, there are no wetlands identified on the property. Therefore, the amendment will not adversely affect the natural environment. 3 VI. CONCLUSION The amendment of the Future Land Use Plan and Zoning Atlas is appropriate and serves to provide consistency and compatibility of the land use designations and zoning districts throughout the campus. The property could be appropriately developed in compliance with all City of Clearwater criteria for Office (0) zoning. The following Comprehensive Plan Goals, Objectives and Policies are furthered by this amendment: Policy A.2.2.6 — Provide for safe on-site traffc circulation and connections to adjacent arterial and collector streets. The project is located on Drew Street a City Major Collector roadway with direct access via full median opening. Policy A.3.2.1 — All new development or redevelopment of property within the City of Clearwater shall meet all landscape requirements of the Community Development Code. The proposed Master Plan provides ample landscape opportunities that can meet and exceed code requirements Policy A.4.1.1 — No new development or redevelopment will be permitted which causes the level of City services (roads, recreation and open space, water, sewage treatment, garbage collection, public school facilities, and drainage to fall below minimum acceptable levels. The development of this property will not cause levels of service for affected city services to fall below acceptable levels. Policy A.6.1.6 — Land Use decisions in Clearwater shall support the expansion of economic opportunity, the creation of jobs and training opportunities as well as the maintenance of existing industries through establishment of enterprise zones, activity centers and redevelopment areas and by coordination with the Chamber of Commerce, Tourist Development Council and other economic development organizations and agencies The BayCare Corporate Headquarters will provide several jobs within the City of Clearwater. The health care industry is vital to the City of Clearwater and is an existing industry the currently provides thousands of jobs (Morton Plant Hospital). The establishment of the BayCare headquarters in the City furthers this policy. Policy A.6.8.9 — Promote a variety of transportation modes such as walking, bicycling, ride-sharing and mass transit to increase transportation choices and decrease dependence on the single-occupancy vehicle. 0 The site is well served by mass transit as PSTA has several routes along Drew Street and Bayview Avenue. The Master Plan includes construction of PSTA bus shelters at these locations, walking paths through the site to the PSTA bus shelters and public sidewalks. The Master Plan also shows a connection to the EC Moore Complex on the north side of Drew Street which in-turn is served by the Ream Wilson Trail which will encourage alternate modes of transportation. Policy B.1.3.1 — Requests for amendment to the Future Land Use Map will have an analysis of traffic impacts. Using PPC traffic criteria the affect of the land use plan request from RM and R/O/R to R/OL is minimal, creating an increase of only 268 daily trips. An analysis was submitted with the application demonstrating acceptable levels of service and identifying improvements. Objective B3.2 — The City of Clearwater shall encourage and promote mass transit with appropriate land use, zoning and land development policies. The site is well served by mass transit and the ability to place a major employment enter adjacent to mass transit facilities furthers this objective. Policy D.1.3.5 — Extend force mains, lift station capacity and gravity wastewater collection systems to serve existing development as well as new infill development. The site is presently served by wastewater lines within Drew Street and Bayview Avenue, this is an infill development that will connect to existing facilities. Policy D.3.3.4 — Development and redevelopment activities shall comply with all stormwater management design standards and criteria The site is large enough to provide on site stormwater retention ponds. The Master Plan depicts the general location of these ponds which will comply with the City criteria. Policy F.1.2.1 — Any construction in the 100-year floodplain shall comply with all requirements and standards of FEMA and the City's building codes The site is not located in a 100-year floodplain and does not affect floodplains. The location of a corporate headquarters complex will not impact floodplains at all. 5 TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS FOR BAYCARE CORPORATE HEADQUARTERS CLEARWATER, FLORIDA PREPARED �OR: BAYCARE PROPERTIES INC. PREPARED BY: GULF COAST CONSULTING, INC. JANUARY 2011 PROJECT # 10-033 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION II. EXISTING CONDITIONS III. FUTURE C4NDITIONS WITH PROJECT IV. CONCLUSION APPENDIX A APPENDIX B Robert Pergolizzi, AICP/PTP AICP # 9023 / PTP #133 I. INTRODUCTION Clearwater Housing Authority (CHA) owns a 39.8 acre site along Drew Street immediately west of Bayview Avenue in Clearwater. (See Figure 1) The site is presently zoned Medium Density Residential (MDR) and Commercial (C) with a Future Land Use Designation of Residential Medium (RM) and Residential/Office/Retail. The CHA plans to sell the property to BayCare for the purpose of consolidating corporate headquarters functions at this location to contain up to 300,000 squaxe feet of space. The CHA is filing a Land Use Plan Amendment and Rezaning Application, and City of Clearwater 1'lanning staff has requested a traffic impact analysis. Prior to completing this iraff`ic analysis a methodology was established with City of Clearwater Traf£'ic Engineering staff. II. EXISTING CONDITIONS The developnnent of this site will have a trafiic impact on the section of Drew Street between US 19 and McMullen Booth Road. This section of Drew Street is a four-lane divided arterial roadway and is controlled by traffic signals at the Hampton Road intersection, and at McMullen Booth Road. To establish existing conditions PM peak period (4-6 PM} intersection tutning movement counts were conducted at the following locations in Januacy 2�11: Drew Street / Hampton Road (signal) Drew Street/ Bayview Avenue Drew Street / McMullen Booth Road (signal) Gulf-to-Bay Blvd. (SR 60} / Bayview Avenue Intersection geometrics and signal tirr�ings were recorded in the field. Based on the MPO 2010 Level of Service Report the adjacent segment of Drew Street operates at LOS C carrying 18,784 vehicles per day AADT. Existing conditions were analyzed using HCS softwa,re. Existing PM peak hour traffic volumes are shown in Figure 2, and the HCS printouts are inciuded in Appendix A. Overall intersection levels of service (LOS) are shown below: EXISTING INTERSECTION LEVELS OF SERVICE - 2011 Intersection Location Tvt�e LOS Avera e�De_laX Drew St. / Hampton Rd. Signal C 28.0 sec/veh Drew St. / Bayview Avenue Unsignal A/D'� 9.6/26.4 sec/veh Drew St. / McMullen Booth Rd. Signal E 66.4 sec/veh Gulf-to-Bay / Bayview Avenue Unsignal C/E* 24.5/42.9 sec/veh * A/D = LOS major street left turn / minor street approach � .00. .�, c 0 ; � � � � � � � W � >• a x 0 0 aa z w a a N � U � EC MO�RE � � M � � �16 1202 i^,� a� � 83i 857 745 -- 563 585 511 N� N -•-- fi2 � � � t� �' 78 � DREW ST � zz ~ � � 1 � � 3ti �sz-- z�, � —� � r 940 � f r 9?, �e, i9 ---� r-- �89 63� 13� '�jF 839 -" � N 0^0 r � N 'L$ -'^ O i0 M 88 � "� � 318 � N M �� CHURCH W � � z W �� " � o � � � x �� '�� o N � 19d n o �n � 2875 �J 1 I--� (� 3 t GULF-TO-BAY BLVD 17 � � � � �sos -- �n ° N a --� EXISTING PM PEAK HOUft TRAFFIC (2Q i i) Gulf Coast Consulting, Inc. DATG: Land Development Consulting JAN/201 1 -1 �: DRAWN BY: MKC PROJCC!' NO: 10-033 rtGUREr The adjacent segments of Draw Street were analyzed using the FDOT Genei•alized Capacity Tabies. The segment between US 19 and Hampton Road operates at LOS C cat7ying 2,142 vehicles during the PM peak hour, the segment between Hampton Road and McMullen Booth Road operates at LOS C carrying 1,778 vehicles during the PM peak hour. EXISTING ROADWAY LEVELS OF SERVICE - 2011 Roadway Segment Lane Peak Hr. LOS D Pk Hr. �Rrom — To) Type Volume Capacity LOS Drew (US 19 — Hampton Road) 4LD 2142 3220 C Drew (Hampton — Bayview) 4LD 1778 3220 C Drew (Bayview—McMullen Booth) 4LD 1374 3220 C III. FUTURE CUNDITIONS WITH PROJECT A. BACKGROUND TRAFFYC The build-out date of the complex is expected to be 2015. As requested by the City of Clearwater, background traffic in 2015 was estimated by applying a 1% annual growth rate to existing traffic. B. PROJECT TRAFFIC The BayCare HQ will consolidate office functions into one location and will contain several meeting rooms, corporate t�aining rootns, file storage and data processing functions. Project traffic was estimated using ITE Titip Generation, 8�` Edition, Land Use Code 714 (Corporate Headquarters}. At full huild-out of 300,000 square feet, the project would generate 2,394 daily trips of which 447 would occur during the AM peak hour (416 entering / 31 exiting) and 420 would occur during the PM peak hour (42 entering / 378 exiting). Projeci traffic was distributed to the roadway system based on the following percentages which were based on residence locations of BayCare employees expected tv work at this complex: 30% west on Drew Street 10% west on Gulf to Bay Boulevard 20% south on McMullen Booth Road 20% north on McMullen Booth Road 20% east on Courtney Campbell Causeway Project trafiic was distributed to the roadway system and the intersections and adjacent segments of Drew Street were reanalyzed. Project traffic fiom the proposed development comprises a moderately significant impact. as compared to the PM peak hour LOS D capacify of nearby roadways, particularly to Drew Sneet. Roadway Segment Lane Project LOS D Project �From — To) Type Traffic Capacitv % Drew (US 19 — Hampton) 4LD +12? 3220 3.94% Drew (Hampton — Site) 4LD +127 3220 3.94% Drew (Site — Bayview) 4LD +144 3220 4.47% Drew {Bayview — McMullen Booth) 4LD +234 3220 7.26% McMullen Booth (SR 60-Drew) 6LD +150 5360 2.80% McMullen Booth {Drew — SR 590) 6LD +84 5360 1.57% SR 60 {Hampton — Bayview) 6LD +42 4880 0.08% SR 60 (Bayview—McMullen Booth) 6LD +17 4880 0.�3% SR 60 (McMullen Booth-Bayshore} 6LD +84 5360 1.Sb% Pinellas County is constructing interseciion improvements at the Drew Street / McMullen Booth Road intersection. These improvements include adding a southbound right turn lane, reconfiguring the noi�thbound approach to provide dual left turn lanes, and modifying the eastbound approach to include dual left turn lanes, a shared leftltluough lane, and an exclusive right turn lane. Other potential modificatians include restricting movements at the westbound approach. These extensive improvements combined with signa.l timing modifications will substantially improve the intersection operations. Future PM peak hour volumes are shown in �igure 3, the HCS printouts are in Appendix B. The expected future intersection levels of service are shown below: FUTURE iNTERSECTION LEVELS OF SERVICE - 2015 Intersection Location Drew St. / Hampton Rd. Drew St. / Bayview Avenue Drew St. / McMullen Booth Rd. Gulf-to-Bay / Bayview Avenue Drew St / Drive A Bayview Ave / Drive B Tvne Signal Unsignal Signal Unsignal Unszgnal Unsignal �' A/C = LOS major street left turn / minor street approach LOS C B/D* D D/F* A/C* A/B* Averag�e Delay 30.1 sec/veh 10.3/28.8 sec/veh 44.6 sec/veh 27.5/52.2 sec/veh 9.7/16.6 sec/veh 73/11.2sec/veh The major intersections would continue to operate at an acceptable level of service considering the Pinellas County improvements ai Drew Street and McMullen Booth Road. Minor tuin lane improvements may be helpful at minor intersections to reduce delay to right turning motorists. With background traffic and project traffic added the adjacent segments of Drew Street would continue to operate at acceptable levels of service. / � ��5 i— 9 cso> 8,2 -- -� r �, Z5> , z —� N M Q '" Q � v / a x H 0 O � z � ��1 -/-� � EC MOORB �� M� a �17 1363 N o a � 979 1006 784 _.__ 595 618 541 N�n � �- 85 � �1 1 I_,_ � �s � DREW ST � z3 � � J � � � az 99, 4 r s�� 94� 92� -- � r ,045 88� (� '� 14 � � I I —�' � —� 20 —7 rn ao —.r. —� 356 � � � I 885._-�. � c� � � f °° � , 50 —�- N rn`rQi 92 � `� � 481 � `� � Q � t ° � c�auxcx N � A SITE ¢ � 420 PM TRIPS DRIVE T3 � � N� n� O(42 ENTERj378 EXIT) (-� 447 AM TRIPS �8) 90 J �� (416 ENT£R/31 EXIT) (3) 38 � � N � � � � M N W o� �t m N � 2�5 n o co -- 2990 � 1 L�. � 3 GULF-TO-BAYBLVD ZZ� -7 i r- � aeo -- � a N a� FUTURE PM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC (2015) �n Gulf Coast Consulting, Inc. DA7��: �� JAN/2011 � Land Development Consulting ` �. �: � DRAWM BY: MKC PROJGCI' NO: �a-o33 FIGURG: FUTURE ROADWAY LEVELS OF SERVICE - 2015 Roadway Segment Lane Peak Hr. LOS D Pk Hr. �From — To) Ty�e Volume Capacitv LO5 Drew (US 19 — Hampton Road) 4LD 2354 3220 C Drew (Hampton — Site Access) 4LD 1976 3220 C Drew (Site Access — Bayview) 4LD 1731 3220 C Drew (Bayview—McMullen Booth) 4LD 1663 3220 C IV. CONCLUSION The campus is expected to include up to 300,000 square feet of corporate headquarters office space at full build-oui. This analysis demonstrates the additional trafiic wi11 comprise approximately 7.26% of the LOS D capacity of the adjacent segtnenf of Drew Street and these segments would continue to operate at acceptable levels of service. The adjacent intersections and roadways segments would continue to operate at acceptable levels of service given improvements under construction by Pinellas County. Additional recommended improvements to be completed by the developer include: 1. Construct project main access to Drew Street (Drive A) to include two exiting lanes to separate left and right turning vehicles, construct an eastbound right turn lane on Drew Street. Lengthen the existing westbound left turn Iane to include 100-feet of full width storage plus deceleration distance. 2. Construct project secondary access to Bayview Avenue. Tha driveway should include two exiting lanes to separate left and right turning vehicles. Construct a northbound left tuim lane on Bayview Avenue to include 175 feet of full width storage plus deceleration distance. 3. At the Drew Street Bayview Avenue intersection construct a northbound left turn lane. 4. Install bus pads and bus shelters along Drew Street and Bayview Avenue to accommodate PSTA routes and provide pedestrian access. 5. Provide pedestrian crosswalk across Drew Street to connect to the EC Moore complex and recreational trail to facilitate pedestrian access. �:�3�+ I�t:�7� A Page 1 of 1 Robert Pergolizzi From: Robert Pergolizzi Sent: Thursday, January 06, 2011 1:48 PM To: 'Himanshu.Patni@myClearwater.com' Subject: Drew Street Site Rezoning - Traffic Study Hinamshu - As we discussed this morning, we will be conducting a detailed traffic study for a Land Use Plan Amendment/Rezone ior the 40 acre site located at Drew Street and Bayview Avenue. The project would include a corpo�ate HQ bulEding(s) for a major employer, and would incfude between 20d,000- 300,000 square feet. According to ITE Trip Generation LUC 714 (Corporate HQ} the site would generate up to 2,394 trips per day , 447 AM peak trips and 420 PM peak trips. Access would be to Drew Street and to Bayview Avenue. GCC will obtain PM peak period (4-6 PM} intersection turning movement counts at the foliowing locations: Drew Street/ Hampton Road Drew Street / Bayviw Avenue Drew Street / McMullen Booth Road Gulf-to-Say / Bayview Avenue Existing condi#ions at these intersections will be analyzed, (inluding improvements being completed at McMulien Booth intersection), future conditions for thes intersections will be anafyzed to include a 1% annual growth rate and project traffic. The segment of Drew Street beiween US 19 and McMullen Booth Road will be analyzed for both existing and future conditions. The study wi{I be submiited with the Plan AmendmentlRezone applications by the February 1, 2011 deadllne. Thanks for your assistance. Robert Pergolizzi, AICP, PTP Gulf Coast ConsulEing, Inc. 13825 ICOT Bouievard, Suite 605 Cleanivater, FI 33760 Phone: 727-524-1818 Fax: i27-524-6090 Celiphon e: 727-644-2695 emaif: pergo@gulfcoastconsultinginc.com 1/6i201 I 2009 Peak Season �actos Category Report - Report Type: ALL Category: 1500 PZNELLAS COUNTYwIDE MOCF: 0.93 Week Dates SF PSCF m,z�za-s-�_-----��s-----:��--_____�__�_�a__��_°�--------------- -- i O1/O1/2009 - O1/03/2009 1.10 1.18 2 O1/04/2009 - O1/10/2009 1.07 1.i4 3 O1/11/2009 - O1/17/2009 trl7�; 1.22 4 O1/18/2009 - O1/24/2009 1.03 1.10 5 O1/25/2009 - O1/31/2009 1.01 1.08 6 •02/O1/2009 - 02/0'I/2�09 0.99 1.06 7 02/OB/2009 - 02/7.4/2009 0.97 1.04 * 6 02/15/2009 - 02/21/2009 0.95 1.02 * 9 02/22/2009 - 02/26/2009 0•94 1.01 *10 03/O1/2009 - 03/07/2009 0.93 1.00 *11 03/OB/2009 - 03/14/2009 0.92 0.98 *12 03/15/2099 - 03/21/2009 0.91 0.97 "13 03/22/2009 - 03/28/2009 0.91 0.97 *14 03/29/2009 - 04/04/2009 0.92 0.98 *15 04/OS/2009 - �9/11/2009 0-92 0.98 *16 04Y12/2009 - 04/18/2009 �.93 1.00 *1'I 04/19/2009 - 04/25/2009 0.94 1.01 *16 04/26/2009 - OS/02/2009 0.95 1.02 *19 OS/03/2009 - OS/09/2009 0.96 1.03 *20 OS/10/2009 - OS/16/2009 0•97 1.04 21 OSl17/2009 - OS/23/2009 0.97 1.04 22 95/24/2009 - OS/30l2009 0.97 1.04 23 05/31/2009 - 06/06/2009 0_97 1.04 24 06/07/2Q09 - 06/13/2009 0.97 1.04 25 06/19/2009 - 06/20/2009 0.97 1.04 26 06/21/2009 - 06/27/2009 0.98 7..05 27 06/28/2009 - 07/04/2009 0.98 1.05 � 28 07/OS/2009 - 0�/11/2009 0.99 1.06 � 29 07/12/2009 - 07/18/2009 0.99 J.•06 30 07/19/2009 - 07/25/2009 I.00 1.07 31 07/26/2009 - 06/O1/2009 1.00 1.07 32 OB/02/2009 - 08/OB/2009 1.01 ' 1.08 33 08/09/2009 - 08/15/2009 1.01 1.06 34 08/16/2009 - 08/22/2009 1.03 1.10 35 OB/23/2009 - OB/29/2009 1.04 1.11 36 08/30/2009 - 09/OS/2009 1.05 1.12 37 09/06/2009 - 09/].2/2009 1.06 1_13 38 09/13/2009 - 09/19/2009 I.07 1.14 39 09/20/2009 - 09/26/2009 1.06 1.13 40 09/27/2009 - 7.0/03/2009 1.06 1_13 41 10/04/2009 - 10/10/2009 1.05 1.12 42 10/11/2009 - 10/1?/2009 1.05 1.12 A3 10/18l2009 - 10/24/2009 1.05 1.12 44 10/25/2009 - 10/31/20�9 1.06 1.13 45 11/O1/2009 - 11/07/2004 1.07 1.14 46 11/08/2009 - 11/lA/2009 1.08 1.16 47 11/15/2009 - 11/21/2009 1.08 1.16 48 11/22/2009 - 11/28/2009 1.09 1.17 49 11/29/2009 - 12/OS/2009 1.09 1.17 50 22/06/2009 - 12/12/2009 1.09 1.1? 51 12/13/2009 - 12/19/2009 1.10 1.18 52 12/20/2009 - 12/26/2009 1.07 1.14 53 12/27/2009 - 12/31/2Q09 1.05 1.12 * Peak Seasoa Page 1 of 2 Detailed Report Page 1 of 1 HCS+"" DETAILED REPORT General lnformatlon Site Informatlon Analysf RP Intersection DREW/HAMPTON Agency or Co. GCC Area Type A!/ other areas Date Performed 1/14/2011 Jurisdiction CLEARWATER Time Period PM PEAK Analysis Year 2091 EX1STlNG Project ID Volume and Tfmin In u! EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Number of Lanes, N� 1 2 0 ? 2 4 1 9 0 1 9 0 Lane Grou L TR L TR L TR L TR Valume, V(v h 13 839 88 18 831 8 344 2 78 4 0 27 % Heavy Vehicles, °loHV 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 .90 0.90 0.90 Pretimed P) or Actuated A A A A A A A A A A A A A Start-up Lost Time, I� 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Extension of Effeative Green, e 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival Ty e, AT 3 4 3 4 3 3 3 3 Unit Extension, UE 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 FflteringlMetering, I 1.000 9.000 1.000 1.000 9.000 1.000 7.000 9.000 Initial Unmet Demand, Qn 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Ped / Bike ! RTOF2 Volumes 0 0 20 0 0 0 0 0 30 0 0 10 Lane Width 12.0 12,0 42.0 92.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 �2.0 Parking ! Grade / Parking N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N Parking Maneuvers, Nm Buses Stopping, Ns 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Min. Time for Pedestrians, GP 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2 Phasing Excl. I.eft EW Perm 03 04 NS Rerm Q6 07 08 G= 7.0 G= 38.0 G= G= G= 20.0 G= G= G= Timing Y= 5 Y= 5 Y= Y= Y= 5 Y= Y= Y= Duration of Anai sis, T= 0.25 C c{e Length, C= 80.0 Lane Grou Ca aci Control De1a , and LOS Deferminaffon EB WB NB SB l.T TH RT l.T TH ftT LT TH RT LT TN RT Adjusted Flow Rate, v �4 1008 20 932 382 55 4 19 Lane Group Capacity,c 373 1666 346 1682 347 398 336 396 v/c Ratio, X 0.04 0.61 0.06 0.55 1.10 0.?4 0.01 0.05 Totai Green Ratio, g/C 0.63 0,47 0.63 0.47 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 Uniform Delay, d� 6.7 15.5 7.0 15.0 30.0 23.3 22.6 22.8 Progression Factor, PF 1.000 0.803 9.000 0.803 1.000 �.000 1.000 9.000 Delay Calibration, k 0.11 0.19 0.11 0.15 0.50 0.11 0.19 0.19 Inc�emenial Delay, d2 0.0 0.6 0.1 0.4 78.2 0.2 0.0 0.9 Initial Queue Delay, d3 p.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Control Delay 6.7 13.1 7.1 12.4 108.2 23.5 22.fi 22.8 Lane Group LOS A 8 A B F C C C Approach Delay 93.0 12.3 97.6 22.8 Approach LOS 8 8 F C lntersection Delay 28.0 X� = 0•�� Intersection LOS C Copyright O 2007 University of Florida, Afi Rights Reserved JiCStT�''� Verston 5.3 Generated: 1M412011 70:37 AM fle://C:1Documents and Settingslrpergolizzi.GULFCOAST1Loca1 Settings\Temp1s2k4D,tmp 1/14/2011 PROJECT: LOCATION: DA • LAN l'YPE: NB SB EB WB PEAK HOUR PEAK HOUR / P.H.F. DATA BAY CARE DREW ST SITE PROJECTNO: to-033 Hampton Rd {NS) & Drew St (E-YI� January 12,2011 SPEED LIMff: SIGNAL TIMfNG: @ C,3 Y R {SECONDS) 3 La�e NB 35 NB WA 16 4 64 2 Lane SB {V/A SB WA 16 4 64 4 Lane Div EB 35 EB 9 55 4 24 4 l.ane Oiv WB 35 WB NIA 33 4 34 PM PEAK NOUR COUNTS TIME NB NB NB SB S8 SS EB EB E8 WB WB WB TOTAL HOURLY PM L T R L T R L T R L T R VOLUME VOLUMES 4:00-4:'15 356 4:15�430 368 4:30-4:45 406 4:45-6:00 429 1,559 5:00.5:15 502 1,705 5:15-5:30 593 '1,930 5:3Q5:45 544 2,068 FFOUIiLY FLOW DIAGRAM 5:45-6:00 506 2,945 30 22 596 2 122 6 0 26 22 1,37� 157 43 1.345 12 3,7p4 1 } I i7ME NB NB NB SB SB SB EB EB EB WB WB WB TOTAL 26 0 4 PM L T R L T R L T R L T R VOLUME I � I �_I L. 5:00-5:15 502 1,145 �--- 12 ^^—� t— 8 �--816 5:15-5:30 593 739 —► �--- 791 5:30-5:45 544 895 —► 84 --� .� 17 —► 877 5:45-6:00 506 �-7 � � I 328 2 74 4 0 26 12 799 84 '17 791 8 2,145 328 2 74 irrr�atsECnoni �a�c Houtt INTERSECTION PEAlC HOUR VOLUME PEAK HOIiR VOLUNIE NB PEAK HOUR VOLt1ME SB PEAK HOUR VOLtlME ES PEAK HOUR YOLUME WB 5:00-6:00 2,145 4a4 30 895 8'I6 INTERSECTION PHF PHF NB PHF SB PHF EB PHF WB 0.90 0.74 0.47 0.92 0.84 1 1 101 404 � --t G �j' �'j�= i.C� � t � �✓ t--ai t 3 --S '�- S � 3a --� F-- g � ; �b �3 '"� ,�""" 1 S ¢ � I� � F f 3� � � V Two-Way Stop Control Page 1 of 1 _ TWU-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General information Site Information nal st RP Iniersection DREW/BAYVIEW enc JCo. GCC urisdiction CLEARWATER Date Performed 9/19/2011 nal sis Year 2011 EXlSTlNG nal sis Time Period PM PEAK Pro'ect Descri tion EasWVest Street: DREW STREET North/South Street: BAYVlEWAVENUE Intersectian Orientation: East West Stud Period hrs : 0.25 ehicle Vo(umes and Ad'ustments Ma or Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R olume veh/h 762 99 22 563 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF ?.00 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 793 19 22 588 0 vehlh Percent Hea Vehicies 0 -- -- 2 -- -- Median T e Raised curb RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 2 0 1 2 0 Confi uration T TR L T U stream Si nal 0 0 Mtnor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 l. T R L T R olume veh/h 982 27 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.96 9,�0 0,96 9.00 9.00 9.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR �89 0 28 0 0 0 veh/h Perceni Heav Vehicles 2 0 2 0 0 0 Percent Grade (°/a) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channefized 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 Confi uration LR Dala Queue Len th and Level of Service pproach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Sauthbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L LR (vehlh) 22 Z17 C (m) {veh/h) E90 380 v/c 0.03 0.57 95% queue length 0.08 3.42 Controi Delay (s/veh) 9.6 26.4 LOS A D pproach Delay (s/veh} -- -- 26.4 pproach LOS -- -- D Copyrlght � 2007 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved NCS+rM Verslon fi.3 Ge�erated: 1/2012011 7:62 AM file://C:1Documents and Settuigslrpergolizzi.GULFCOAST1Loca1 Settings\Temp\u2k66.tmp 1/20/2011 PEAK HOUR / P.H.F. DATA PROJECT: 6+4Y CARE DREW ST SITE PROJECT NO: '10-033 LOCATION: 88yview Ave (NB} 3 Drew St (E-VY) DA7E: January 18, 2011 LANE TYPE: SPEED LIMIi: ^�IGNAL TIMING: � G Y R (SECONDS) (�atapplicabie) NB 2 Lene NB 25 NB � SB WA SB N!A SB EB 4 Lane piv EB 45 EB WB 4 Lane Div WB 45 WB PM PEAK HOUR COUNTS TdM�6 NB NB SB SB SB EB EB EB WB WB WB TOTAI HOURLY Pht L T R L T R L T R L T R VOLUME VOLUMES 4:00-4:15 289 4:i5-4:30 297 4:30-4:45 333 4:45-5:00 329 1,248 5:OQ5:15 348 1,307 5:15-5:30 375 1,385 5:305:45 387 1,439 HOURLY FLOW DIAGRAM 5:45-6:00 4 390 1,500 0 0 272 0 44 0 0 0 0 1,303 35 33 1,065 0 2,748 1 ? I PEAK HOUR 71ME NB NB NB SB SB SB EB EB EB WB WB YYB TOTAL 0 0 0 PM L T R L T R L T R L T R VOtUME I 1 I rl L� 5:00-5:'15 348 709 r 0 —� � 0 f— 557 5:15-5:30 375 726 —► �— 536 5:30-S:45 387 74d —+ 18 —� � 21 � 752 5:45-6:00 390 � � � 773 0 26 0 0 0 0 726 18 2'I 536 0 1,500 173 0 26 1 1 WTERSECTION PEAK HOUR 5:00-6:00 INTERSECTION PHF 0.96 39 199 INTERSECTION PEAK HOUR VOLUME 1,500 AEAK HOUR VOLUME NB 199 PHF NB 0.92 PEAK HOUR VOLUME SB 0 PHF SB �DIV/O! S� =��S PEAK HOUR VOLUME EB �44 PHF EB O.S3 PEAK HOUR VOLUME WB 557 PHF WB 0.34 ^ i�2 -- `^� �"- v <e = `G � � �� 1 � sz �-� Detailed Repart Page 1 of 2 _ ___ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ NCS+'" DETAfLED REPORT General Information Site Information Ana�yst RP (ntersection DREW/MCMULLEN Agency or Co. GCC BOOTH Date Performed 9/14/2011 Area Type All other areas Jurisdiction CLWTR/P!N CO Time Period PM PEAK Analysis Year 2091 EXlSITNG Project ID Volume and Timin !n ut EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TN RT Number of Lanes, N� 9 1 9 1 9 0 9 3 0 9 3 0 Lane Grou L LT R L TR L TR L TR Volume, V v h 271 48 398 31 62 96 204 3265 35 29 1504 245 °!o Heav Vehiciss, °taHV 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 Q.98 0.98 0.98 Pretimed P or Actuated (A) A A A A A A A A a a A A Start-u Lost Time, !� 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Extension of Effective Green, 2 0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 e Arrival T e, AT 3 3 3 3 3 3 4 3 4 Unit Extension, UE 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3,0 3.0 Filterin /Meterin , I 9.000 1.000 9.000 9.000 9.000 9.000 ?.000 1.000 1.000 Initial Unmet Demand, Q� 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Ped / Bike / RTOR Volumes 0 0 80 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 60 Lane Width 12.0 92.0 12.0 12.0 92.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Parking / Grade / Parking N D N N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N Parking Maneuvers, Nm Buses Sto in , Na 0 0 D 0 0 0 0 0 0 Min. Time for Pedestrians Gp 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2 Phasin EB Onl WB Onl 03 04 Excl, Left NB Onl Thru & RT 08 Timing G= 33.0 G= 23.0 G= G= G= 92.0 G= 28.0 G= 11&.0 G_ Y= 7 Y= 7 Y= Y= Y= 6 Y= 0 Y= 6 Y= Duration of Anal sis, T= 0.25 C cIe Len th, C= 240.0 Lane Grou Ca aci Control Dela and I.OS Determinaifon EB WB NB SB LT TH RT l.T TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Adjusted Flow Rate, v 994 132 243 32 79 208 3368 30 1724 Lana Group Capac(ty, c 243 248 521 170 173 339 3082 89 2454 vlc Ratio, X 0.80 0.53 0,47 0.99 0.4fi 0.61 J.09 0.34 0.70 Total Green Ratio, g/C 0.14 O.t4 0.33 0.10 0.90 0.19 0.69 0.05 0.49 Uniform Delay, d� 100.3 g6.3 63.8 gg,g 102.6 gg.g 47.0 �T �"2 47.4 Progression Factor, PF 1.000 1.000 9.000 9.000 1.d00 1.000 0.555 1.000 0.779 Delay Calibration, k 0.34 0.94 0.91 0.19 0. 91 0.20 0.50 0. 91 0.27 (ncrementai Delay, d2 96.9 2.2 0.7 0.5 1.9 3.3 47.8 2.2 0.9 Initial Queue Qelay, d3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Q.0 Control Delay 117.2 98.5 64.5 100.4 904.5 92.1 73.8 912.4 37.8 F F E -F F F E F D file://C:\Documenis and Settingslrpergolizzi.GULFCOAST1Local Settings\Temp\s2k96.tmp 1/20/20I 1 Detailed Report _ �� _ , Lane Group LOS Approach Delay 90.3 Approach LOS F Intersection Delay 66.4 Copyrlght C�i 2007 University of Florida, Alf Rights Reserved Page 2 of 2 , � � ,� � , i ,i <, _ __ 903.3 74.9 F E X� = 0.94 Intersection LOS NCS+T� Version 5.3 39.1 D E Generated: S/20i2011 8:37 AM file://C:\Documents and Settingstrpergolizzi.GULFCOASTiLocal Settings\Temp\s2k96.hnp 1f20/2011 P$ JECT: LqCATION: � LANE IYPE• NB SB EB WB PF11K HOUR PEAK NOUR 1 P.fi.F. DATA BAY CARE DREW ST SfTE PROJECT NO: 10-033 NcMulle�rBooth RO (NSj 8 Drew St (E-IM1� January 1 �, 201'I SPEED LIMff: SIGNAL TIMING: A 1C Y R (SECONDS) 6 lane Div NB 45 NB 40 176 5 55 6 Lane Div SB 45 SB 12 141 5 55 4 Lane Div EB 45 EB 25 25 4 215 2lBne WB 25 WB 9 9 4 230 TIME PM 4:00�:'I S 4:15-430 4:30�:45 4:455:00 5:00-5:15 5:75-5:30 5:30-5:45 5:45-6:00 TIME P6i 4:45-5:00 5:00-5:15 5:'I 5-5:30 5:3Q5:45 PM PEAK HOUR COUNTS NB NB NB SB SB SS EB EB EB WB WB WB TOTAL HOURLY L T R L T R L T R L T R VOLUME VOLUMES 1,172 1.327 1,243 '1,424 5,166 �,439 5,433 1,413 S,S19 '1,464 6,740 HOURLY FL�W DIAGRAM 1,306 5,622 — t,693 3,383 403 5,822 61 43 2,619 452 508 97 576 60 1i7 30 10,788 1 � NB NB NB SB SB SB EB ES EB WB WB WB TOTAL 233 1,432 28 L T R L T R L T R L T R VOLUME � I I � L. 1,424 A86 �— 258 —S '�. 15 �—'103 1,439 46 —+ � 59 1,4�3 60T —► 303 � � 29 -^^► 107 _ ,.� .� r r 194 3.1'10 33 28 1,432 233 258 46 303 28 59 15 5,740 194 3,1'[0 33 INTERSECTION PEAK HOUR INTERSECTION PEAK }lOilR VOLUME PEAK HOtJR VOLUME NB PEAK HOUR VOlUME SB PEAK HOUR YOLUME EB PEAK HOUR VOWME VYB 4:45-5:4fi 5,740 3,337 1,693 6D7 103 iNTERSECTION PHF PHF NB PHF SB PHF EB PHF WB 1 T 0.98 t,764 3,337 0.96 Z4S u0# �c 0.95 � ` o.sz S F = I. a j y 0.86 � { �' � 1..v..-_ � �, ��i � �s .�, 4— C�,2 G3� �t �y "� 3� S J, �1� � r 35 3zC� Two-Way Stop Control PaEe 1 of 1 - � �%�rvf.•� ..i�.ii�1JtY,tt V�l,Uhtl;':; �r�C�((3Y4:i-� ��;� 70°!J 1'd ��CCr�»7 l=ri�{.. �RI.:Y.i �..iyt��tit�. t° c..�, :� _ __ ___. TWO WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY r�< �„r.,�;°:> qa�d General fnformation Site Information nal st RP Intersection GULF TO BAY/BAYVIEW enc /Co. GCC Jurisdiction CLEARWATER/FDOT Date Performed 9/19/2091 nal sis Year 2099 EXISTlNG nal sis Time Period PM PEAK Rro'ect Descri tion East/West Street: GULF TO BAY SLVD North/South Street: BAYVlEW AVENUE Intersection Orientation: East-West Stud Period hrs ; 0.25 ehicle Votumes and Ad'ustments Ma'or Street Eastbound Westbound Mavement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R oEume veh/h 17 1265 8 3 2092 990 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 Nourly Flow Rate, HFR q8 1360 8 3 2163 204 veh/h Percent Heav Vehicles 2 -- -- 2 -- -- Median T e Two Way Leff Turn Lane RT Channelized D 0 Lanes ? 2 1 9 2 p Confi uration L T R L T TR U stream Si nal 0 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 1 a 11 12 L T R L T R olume veh/h 5 0 92 6 0 34 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.83 Q.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 Hourly Ftow Rate, HFR 5 0 12 S 0 36 veh/h Percent Heav Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 � Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 Q Lanes 0 9 0 0 1 0 Confi uration LTR LTR Dela Queue Len th and Level of Ssrvlce pproach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Conftguration L L LTR LTR v(vehlh) 18 3 17 42 C(m) (veh/h) 203 498 225 136 v/c 0.09 0.01 0.08 0.39 95% queue length 0.29 0.02 0.2a 9.21 Control Delay (s/veh) 24.5 12.3 22.3 42,g LOS C 8 C E pproach Delay (s/veh) -- -- 22.3 42.9 pproach L�S -- -- - C E Copyright 0 2607 University of Florida, All Rlghts Reserved HCS�TM Ve�slon 6,3 Generated: 1/2d/2011 8:14 AM � d 1...� f E� LOCATtON: DATE" LAN 7'YPE: N8 SB E8 WB � PFJ1K HpUR! P.H.F. DATA BAY CARE DREW ST SITE PROJECT NO: 10-033 Bayview Ave (NS) � Gulf to Bay Blvd (E-11V� Janu3ry 73. 2011 SPEED LIMIT: SIGNAL Tld[lNG: A_ ,1C, Y R (SECONDS) (not applieable) 2 Lane NS 25 NB 2 Lane 58 25 SB 7 Lane EB 45 EB 7 Lane WB 45 WS 71ME PM 4:00-4:15 4:15-4:30 4:30-4:45 4:455:00 5:00-5:15 5:15-5:30 5:30-5:45 5:45-8:00 TiME PM 5:00-5:15 5:95-5:30 5:3a5:45 5:45�6:00 PM PEAK HOUR COUN7'S NB NB NB SS SB SB EB EB EB WB WB WB TOTAL HOURLY L T R L T R L T R L T R VOLUAl1E VOLUMES 932 973 957 1,098 3,960 1,790 4,2'[8 7,276 4,b2'f '1,124 4,688 HOURRY FLOW DfAGRAM 9.133 4.723 — 39 '197 �4 0 27 12 0 66 28 3,301 25 9 4,927 274 8,683 1 ? I NB NB NB SB SB SB EB EB EB WB WB WB TOTAL 33 0 6 L F R L T R L 7 R L T R VOLUME I I I t.J r �_,. • 1,190 2,776 �— 16 � L 181 �----2,922 1,276 1,T22 —► t— 2,738 1.124 t,746 —+ g ----�, � 3 —► 1,739 — � �'133 � * �-+ � � 5 0 11 6 0 33 S6 1,722 8 3 2,738 187 4,723 5 0 11 INTERSECTION PEAK HOUR INTERSECTION PEAK HOUR VOLUME PEAK HOUR VOLUME NB PEAK HOUR YOLUME SB PEAK HOUR VOLUME EB PEAK HOUR VOLUd1E NB S:Q0�:00 4,723 18 39 1,746 z,szz INTERSECTION PHF PHF NB PHF SB PHF EB PHF WB 0.93 0.80 0.89 0.83 0.99 l t 11 16 J� _ �.�� 34 �' Cr� � � �--a �! ,..� �-- t 9:? '4��:t�� 4--- 28? a 3 � �� S o ►� TABLE 1 �eneralized Annual Average Daify �olumes for Florida's Urbanized Areas lo�Qi�o STATG SIGNALIZ�D ART�RIALS T'REEWAYS �IaSS �(>Q.00 to 1.99 signalized intersections per �nile) �nes B C D � Lanes Media�i B C D E 4 43,500 59,800 73,b00 74,400 2 Undivided 9,600 15,400 1b,500 �'** 6 65,300 90,500 110,300 122,700 a Dividcd 29,300 35,500 36,,700 *�`* 8 87,000 120,100 146,500 166,000 6 Divided 45,000 53,700 �55,300� �** l0 108,700 151,700 184,000 209,200 4,,.�_.__...._ 8 Divided 60,800 71,800 73,800 **M 12 149,300 202,100 238,600 252,500 �ree�vay Adjustments CIaSS II (2.OQ to 4.50 signalized intersections por mile) Awciliary Ramp Ianes Median B C D � Lanes Metering 2 Undivided ** 10,500 ;15,2-00! 16,200 +2a.000 t$% 4 Divided �* 25,00� i33�20Q� 3$,100 6 Divided ** 39,000 ;50�3Q0`; 53,100 ��TERRUPTED F�'T.OW flIGHWAYS 8 Divided ** 53,100 67,300 7d,900 Lanes Median B C D � Class IItIIV (more than 4.5 signalized intersections per mite) 2 Undivided 7,800 15,600 22,200 27,900 Tanes Median B C D E 4 llivided 34,300 49,600 64,300 72,800 2 Undivided *'r 5,100 11,900 14,900 6 Divided 51,500 74,400 96,400 109,400 4 Divided ** 12,600 28,200 31,900 Uninterrupted Flow Highway AdjustmenEs 6 Divided *�' 19,700 43,700 48,200 Lanes Median Exctusive left lanes Adjustment factors 8 Divided �"� 27,000 59,500 64,700 2 Divided Yes +S% Multi Undivided Yes -5% Multi Undivided No -25% Non-State Signalized Road�vay Adjustments BICYCLE MOD�Z (Alter corresponding state volwnes by the u�diceted percent) (Multiply motorized vehicla volumes shown below by numher of diractional roadway lanes to determine two-way maximwn service voliunes.) Major City/County Roadways -10% Paved Shoulder/ Bicycle Lana Other Signalized Roadways - 35% coverage B C D E o-a�% ** 3,200 12,100 >12,100 State & Non-Stt�te Signalized Roadway Adjustments so-84% 2,4Q0 3,700 >3,700 *** (Alter corresponding statc volwnes by the indicated percent.) 85-100% 6,300 >6,340 *�` * ** �` Divided/Undivided & Turn Lane Adjustments pED�STRIAN MODEZ Exclusive Exclusiva Adjustmant Lanes Median Left Lanes Right i.anes Factors (MulHply motorized vehicle volumes shown betow by number of directional 2 Divided Yes No -FS% roadway lanes to determine two-way maximu�n sen+ice volumes.) 2 Undivided IQo No -20°/a Sidewa►k Coverage B C D E Multi Undivided 1'es No -5% 0•49% '�* �`* $,000 14,400 Multi Undividod No No -25% 50-84% *'� *'� 11,300 18,800 - - - Yes �I- 5% 85-t00% *� 11,400 18,8Q0 >18,800 One-Way I+acility Adjustment BUS MODE (Scheduled Fixed Route)' {Buses in peak hour in peak direction) Muttipiy t[u correspoucling two-directional voluutes in tius table by 0.6, Sidewalk Coverage B C D E 0-84/0 >5 >4 >3 >Z ss-l00% >4 >3 >2 >1 � Valuea shown are prceeiUod as i�vo-way aunual everaga daily volwnas for lavais of serviee aud ara for tha auromobile/truck modes unless specificully steted. Althaug6 presented as daily volumcs, thcy actuaUy represeut peak hour d'uection co¢dilions tivith applicablo K and D featas epplied, This tablo dces not covseihne a atnudncd vtd sliould ba uscd only for geneml planoing npplicxtions. The computu models from tivluch this tablo is dcrivcd should be used fnr mom specific plauuing appticotioas, The tablo and deriving comptdcr modds should nat be used for corridor or intersectian desigq whcro moro rofined techniques axist Calccdatioos are based on planning applications of tho FGglnvay Capecity Manuat, Bicycle LOS Madcl, Pcdoslrian LOS Madel mul Treosit Cepncity and Qustity oFServico Manual, respectively for tho automobilc/m�ck, bicycle, pedesvien and 6us modes. � Leval of secvice foz the hicycle and pcdcstrian modes in this table ia besed on num6er of motoriud vehicles, not number of bicyolisW or pedestrians using the fncility. 3 Huses per ho�v shown aro only for the peak fiovrio thc single direction ofthe highcr haf5c flo�r. SOia'Ce: •• Can�t be achicved usu�g tabla iuput velue defaults. Florida Depu�tment of Traztsportation "'f Not a Gcable for that leLef of swice letter da. For Q�e autoino6i� modc, volwues Systems Planning Office pp gre gfcatar d�au leval of service D 605 Suwanuee Street MS i9 becamo F Ixcause intecsec�ion capecitics daw ban r�ached For tha bicycle uwde, tha laval of scrvice lettar grade (iueluding . f) u not aehievable becauso there is no maxiumum vehicta volnme thcesLold usiog table input velua defsalts. T8I18I19SSC0, FL 32399-0450 www dot s�ate fl us/plenning/syste�c/s�n/toc/defauft��htm 2009 �DOT QUALITY/LEVEL OF SERVICE HAN D800K Generalized Pealt Hour iwo-Way Valumes for Florida's TA�L� 4- Urt�anized,4reas1 �oiai�o STAT� SIGNALIZ�D ART�RIALS FREEWAYS ClflSS 1(>0.00 to 1.99 signalized intersectians per milc) I.a��es B C D � Lanes Median B C D E 4 4,000 5,500 6,770 �,300 2 Undivided 930 1,500 1,600 *�� G 6,000 8,320 10,150 I1,29U 4 Divided 2,840 3,440 3,560 *** 8 8,000 11,050 13,480 15,270 6 Divided 4,370 5,200 ! 5,360 , *�* 10 10,000 13,960 16,930 19,250 � *** �2 13,730 18,6Q0 21,950 23,230 8 Divided 5,900 6,970 7,160 • I+reewny Adjustments C18SS II(2.00 to 4.50 signalized intersectio�u per mile) Auxiliary Ramp Lanes Median B C D E Lanes Meterutg 2 Uudivided ** 1,020 ; 1,480; I,570 + F,800 +5% 4 T�ivided ** 2,420 �� 0� 3,400 6 Divided ** 3,790 ;4,880 S,I50 UNINTERRUPTED FLOW HIGHWAYS s Divided '"* 5,150 6,530 6,880 Lanes Median B C D E Class IIUN {more than 4.50 signaiized iniersections per mile) 2 Undivided 730 1,460 2,080 2,G20 Lanes Median B C D E 4 Divided 3,220 4,660 6,040 6,84Q 2 Undividad ** 500 1,150 1,440 6 Divided 4,840 6,990 9,060 10,28d 4 Aivided *'^ 1,220 2 730 3 100 ' ' Unintea•rupted Flow Higt��vay Adjustments 6 Divided �`* 1,910 4,240 4,680 Lanes Median Exclusive left lanes Adjustment factors 8 Divided ** 2,620 5,770 6,280 2 Divided Yes +5% Mulri Undivided Yes -5% MuIN Undivided No -25% lYon-State Signalized Roadwxy Adjustments BICYCLE MODEZ (Altcr corresponding state volumes by the indicnted percent.) (MidtipEy motorized vehicle volwnes siiown below by number of dicectional roadway lanes to deteanine two-way maximum service volumes.) MajOr City/County Roadways - 10% Paved Shoulder/ Bicyele Lane Othec Sigi�alized Roadways - 350�o coverage B C D � 0-49% ** 310 1,1$0 >1,180 State & 1`7on-Stste Signalized Road�vay Adjusfn�nts 50-84% 240 360 >360 *** (Alter conesponding state vol�unes by the indicafed percent.) SS-100% G2Q >620 *'�* �`*'� Divided/Undivided & Turn I,ane Adjustments pED�STRIAN MODEZ Bxclusive Exclusive Adjushnent Lanes Median Left L.enes Rigirt Laues I'actors (Miiltigly motorized vehicic volumes shown bcEow by nwnber of directionai 2 Divided Yes No +5% roadway lancs to determine fwo-vmy maxitnwn service voluinesJ 2 Undivided No No -20% Sidewalk Coverage B C D � Multi Undivided I'es No -5% 0-49% ^`�` *� 480 1,390 Muld Undivided I�o No -25% SQ-84% '�� ** 1,100 1,820 - - -- Yes -h 5% 85-100% '"* 1,100 1,820 >1,820 One-Way T�'acility Adjustmeui BUS MODE (Scheduled Figed Routej3 (IIuses in peak ha�r in peak direetion) Multiply ttae correspouding two-directional volurues iu this table by 0.6. Sidewallc Coverage B C D E o-s�°ia >5 >4 >3 >2 85-�00% >4 >3 >2 >1 � Ve6ws shown aze presented aa ho�uiy two-way volwues for lovals of sorvico and aro for tlie euromobile/truck modes u�dcss specificatly steted NHwugh prcsented es peek hour two- �vey volumes, ihey actuat[y ropresent peak haur peak dicactian conditious with an appllonblo D fuetor applied. 1Lis tab2a doas uot coustituto a stuixlazd and sl�ould be used only for senaral planaing appGcations, Tha computar nwdals fram whieh this ta61e is derived ahould 6e used for �re s�ecific planning applications. 17u table and deciving camputer �nadels shauld uot ba used for comdot ot inteaeclion desigq whe�v moro raSucd tecluuques oxisi. Calcuiations are based oa planniug applications of tha Highway Cepacity Maauel, Bicycle LQS Model, Pedeshinn LOS Model and Traiuit Capacify and Quality of Servica Manual, respectivdy for the eutomo6ilaltruck, bicycle, pedestrian ond 6�u ntodea = Level of service for the bicycle and peclesUieu modes ia this lablo is besul ou numbu of niotoriud velucfes, not numbcr oi bicyclisls orpedestrians using the �acility. ; Buses jxx houra6own ure only for �e peatc 4our iu tlw si�rok �lircction oftle hiEher ua6c Ilow. ,Soul'Ce: •• eeoao� be acwoved �s�g rebfo i�y,uc vau,e de�u�c5. Florida Deparhneut of Tra�ispoitation i0• Not appliceblc far ttwt Icvel of scrvioo kner grada. For the autamobita moda, volwnos gmator tlien level of sen�ice D Systems PlanniAg Qf$Ce becana F bxauso inte�section oapacities hare been reachcd. For thc bicyclo modq iLc lowl of suvice let[er gcade (inoludiog 605 Suwannea Stteet, MS 19 F) is not acluevabla bccauso Wcra is no maximum veLicle votume dvesltold usuig tabla input valtta defaults. TaII&i18SS06� I'L 32399-4450 www.dot.state.fl.us/plannin¢/�}}rstems/sm/los/dafault.shtm 20Q9 fDOT QUALITY/LEVEL Of SERVICE HANDBOOK Generalized Peak Hour Directiona) Volumes for Florida's TABLE 7 Urbanized Areasl �o�a��o STATE SIGNALIZ�D ARTERIALS I{'RE�WAYS Class I(>0.00 to 1.99 signatized intersections per nule) Y.aities B C D E Le�ies Media�t B C A E 2 2,200 3,020 3,'720 4,020 1 Undivided 510 820 880 **�` 3 3,300 4,580 5,580 6,200 2 D;vided 1,560 1,890 1,960 *** 4 4,400 6,080 7,420 8,400 _ .....� 3 Divided 2,400 2,860 2,940; '"�* 5 5,500 7,680 9,320 10,580 4 Divided 3,240 3,83Q 3�940 *'•`* 6 7,560 10,220 I2,080 12,780 £ree�vay Ad,justments C1R33 II (2.00 to 4.50 signrilized infersections per mile} Auxiliary Itamp J.anes Iviedian B C D E Lanes Metering t Undividecl *`� 56Q ? 810`j 860 + 1,000 + 5% 2 Diviaed "* 1,330 (1,,770j 1,870 3 Divided �* 2,080 ; 2,680 j 2,830 �Ij�jTERRIJI'TED F{LOW HIGHWAYS 4 Aivided '�`�` 2,830 3,590 3,78Q Lanes Median B C D• E Class III/IV (more ttian 4.50 signafized intersections per milc) � Undivided 400 800 1,140 1,440 Lanes Medea�i B C D E 2 Divided 1,770 2,560 3,320 3,760 t Undivided *x 270 634 790 3 Divided 2,660 3,840 4,980 5,650 2 Divided '�� 670 1,SOQ I,700 Uninterrupted Fiorv Highwt►y Adjustments 3 Divided '''* 1,050 2,330 2,570 Lanes Median Exclusivelcftlanes Adjushnentfactors 4 Divided *'� 1,440 3,170 3,450 2 Divided Yes +5% MuIN CJndivided Yes -5% Mulli Undivided No -25% Nou-Stnte Signalized Rondway Adjustments BICYCL� MODEZ (Alter coResponding state volumes by tho indicated percent.) (Miiltiply motorized vehicle voiumes shown below Uy numbar of directional roadway lanes to deter�ntne two-way maximwn service volumes.) Major City/County I2Dadw�ys - ld% Paved shoutdarl Bicy�le I.ane Other Signalized Roadways - 35% coverege B C D � o-a9°io ** 170 650 >650 Siate & Non-State Signalized Roadway Adjustments so-s4% 130 200 >200 **'� (Alter conesponding stata volumes by the uidicated percent.) 85-100% 340 >340 '�*'� *** Divided/CJndivided & Turn L.►ne Adj[�siments pEDESTRIAN MOD�� Exclusive Exclusivo Adjustment Lanes Median Le$ Lanes Right Lcumes Factors (Multiply �notorized vehicEe volwnes shown below by number of directionat 2 Divided Yes No +So�a roadway lanes to determiva two-way maximwn service volumes.) 2 ilndivided No No -20% Sidewalk Coveragc B C D E Multi Undivided Yes No -5% 0-d9% ** '�* 270 770 Multi Undivided No Mo -25% 50-84% *�' 100 600 1000 - - - Yes -f' $°/a 85-100°/a �`� b10 1�0� >10�� One-Wa F�cilit Ad ustment BUS MOD� (Scheduled Fi�ed Ro[ate)3 3' y 3 (Buses in peak hour in peak direction) Multiply tlie correspouding volwues in this tabla by 1,20. Sidewalk Coverage B C D r U-84% >5 >4 >3 >2 as-toa�i >4 >3 >2 >1 � Valces shmvu aze pcesented as l�audy dirxdoual voluma for levels of secviee and are for the autanobilrJtruck modcs ueless specificnlly stated. To couvert to annuel averege daily haffic volwnw, tLese voltw�es must bo divided by appropriata D and K ractocs. 7Lie table dpes not constitute a:teudazd aad sltould be used mily for general ptanning �plicntio�. 7'6e computer, modc)s from which tLis table is dcrived should be used for moro epecific planning npplications. Tho table eud deriving wmputer models ateould not be used Cor coeridar or iateesec6iou desigu, whera mae ro6ned techniqves exist Ca(culadons era based on pleuning applications of tLe Flighway Capacity Mentutl, IIicycie IAS Model, Pcdwlrian CAS Model a�id Trausit Cepacily end Quality of5arvico Menuat, respactive(y for the autamobiidtruck, bioycle, pedeshien and bus mades. t Level of service for tha bicycle end pedestrimt madca in this ta61e is besed ou utun6er of motorized velticics, nat numher of bicyclists or pedesUrens usieg tha facility. 3 Auses per hour sho�w ere anly for Ure peak Iwur in Uie singlc di�ection ofdu higl�x tralSc flav. SOt(7'C2: �• Cannoc be ncb;oved usin6 wbta inpur vulue detautis. Florida Deparhnent of Transportation 's• Not n licabla for thac laval of scrvica lener ade. Far thc amomo6i(a mode, volumes Systetns Plannulg Oi6Ce pp �r �tatu then level of servica Q 605 Suwatwee Street, MS 19 baewma F becnwe iuterswtion capautiw 1�aw Inxu reached For tLo bicycle modo, die level of servicc letter grede (including F) is not aahievable bacause tl�uo is no maximutn wlucl¢ volwna thteshdd itsing table input velue defnults. T811ff�1&SSee� �L 32399-0450 www.dotstate.fl.us/�lenn�i�/systems(sm/los/default.shhn 2009 FDOT QUALITY/LEVEL OF SERVICE HANDBOOK APPENDIX B _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _.. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _, �' Land lJse: 714 Corpora�e Headquarters �uilding Description A corporate headquarters building is a singfe tenanf o�ce building that houses the corporate ; headquarters of a company or organiza#ion, which generally consisfs of offices; meeting rooms;� space for file storage and data processing; a restaurant or cafeteria; and ofher service funcfions. General office building (Land Use 71�), single tenant affce building (Land Use 7'f 5), office park (Land Use 750}, research and development center (Land Use 760) and business park (Land Use 770) are related uses. � Additional Data , The average vehicle occupancy for the 10 studies for which information was submitted was approx'rmately 1.2 persons per automobile. The vehicle occupancy rates ranged from 1,03 to 1.74 persons per automobile. The majorify of the sites were surveyed between the late 1980s and the fate 1990s throughout the United States, with nearly haff conducted in the Washington, DC and Atianta, Georgia metropolitan areas. Trip Characteristics The trip generafion for the a.m. and p.m. peak hours of the generator fypically coincided with the peak hours of the adjacent street fraffic; therefore, anly one a.m. peak hour and one p.m. peak hour, which represent both the peak hour of the generator and the peak hour of the adjacent street traffic, are shown for a corporate headquarters building, Source Numbers 9, 247, 251, 262, 273, 298, 302, 303, 304, 323, 324, 327, 406, 444, 524, 552 Trip Generation, 8th Edition 1210 Institute of Transpo�tation Engineers .:� ,�. � _� Corporate Headquarters Builcling � (714) ;, Average Vehicie Trip Ends vs: 10q0 Sq, Feet Gross Ftoor Area On a: Weekday '� Number of Studies: 8 Average 1000 Sq. Feet GFA: 229 Directional Distribution: 50% entering, 50% exiting Trip Genera#ion per 1000 Sq. F'eet Gross Fioor Area Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation 7.98 5.87 - 12.39 3.89 Data Plot and Equation a,000 �,000 6,000 v G W n 5,000 F- N U t j 4,000 a� rn cti > Q 3,Od0 I H 2,000 1,000 0 ..--- : - : ._... : .- : .......: ...... : ......: ..... : .. , -.....i . . , . . . . . X : .. ......'---....X ........ : ...... ....:...... : -.. : .... -I -...-•.----...'...- .:..... ...................�..- - -.-- - --�.......;.....__, � ..... : - -- ; - - : � - - ; ��---� .:.......: ......: ..... : .... : ••••• + , X : : : , : : : 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 X= 1000 Sq. Feet G�oss Floor Area %< Actual Data PoEnts Fitted Curve °----� Average Rate ' , I i ! Fitted Curve Equatiom Ln(1� = 0.97 Ln(X) + 2,23 R2 = 0.94 I Trip Generation, Sth Edition 1216 Instltufe of Transportation Engineers � r � � I i : I i � � i Corporate Headq�arie�rs u�ldir�g (' � �} � Average Vehicle Trip Ends vs: 1000 Sq. Feet Gross Floor Area On a: Weekday, A.M. Peak Nour Number of Studies: i 9 Average 1000 Sq. Feet GFA: 272 Direciional Distribution: 93% entering, 7% exiting Trip Generation per 1000 Sq. Feet Gross Floor Area Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation 1.49 0.46 - 3.01 1.36 Daia Plot and Equation � � c W a � a� � � a� > ro rn N N 4 I I F- 1,40C 1,30C 1,200 1.100 1,000 900 800 700 600 fi00 400 300 200 100 n ..... : .. - . •� - . •- .. ,_....- , . . ...... ..... .;:.- • � ....-� .......:........�....._....._x._._....%C...�_...._. :. ... ..._...._... .... : ..... : ... . : .. ... : ...... : ..... -- � ;---... ; -�---�DC� ----- : : ' � ;� : : ; : .. - ...:...... : .... . : • --- �f'- ... _: ...... : . _ _... :...... ; . _ .. _, :...., . � ....- : � : �--.k.,. _ ._,x ...... ........ . ...... � . --..: .... ; � � . . . . . _ _ . . - . � - - - • . - . . . . - . � - . � . . . . . . . . - . - � . - . . . . � ?ZtX.'�� : : . ; , - -�--..X..x.. .r�_..�.,...---�� ..........:........:... ....:...... : ;-..... .............� `-��- �.`'- -••-:-�.X•--.•........•- � • • - -�,,..F- - - � ; . . . . . . . . - � - : • . . . . . . . . . . : . . . . . . : . . . . � - ; . . _ . . _ . . . . . . � ?E 0 100 200 300 400 500 G00 X=1000 Sq. Feet Gross Floor Area X Acival Data Potnts Fltted Curve Fitted Curve Equatlon: Ln(T) = 0.95 Ln(Xj + 0.66 Tr1p Generation, 8th Edition 1217 70Q 800 900 1000 --"-' Average Rate R2 = 0.80 Institute of Transportation Engineers _ ._ _ _ _ _ _ , __ _ . Corporate Headquarters �uiidrng (714} Average Vehicle Trip Ends vs: 1000 Sq. Feet Gross Floor Area On a: Weekday, P.M. Peak Hour Number of Studies: 21 Average 1000 Sq. Feet GFA: 279 Directionaf Distribution: 10% entering, 90% exiting Trip Generatiort per 1000 Sq. Feet Gross Floor Area Average Rate Range of Rates 1.40 0.52 - 2.67 Data Plot and Equation 1,30C 1,20C 1,100 1,000 � 900 c W fl- B00 H a� � 7OO L � � N B�O m m ¢ 50Q II � 400 300 200 100 n Standard Deviation 1.28 ....._ ... � . --�� , - �-�- , �-- _ .._... - � , ��- .'.' .... , - -• .._.... -- ...� ............. ..:...x....:_ __....:....... � --...:.. ........ ' � • � , � . : ..... :.......:.... � �--- -� �- -...:..X.-• -- : - .; ......K...... ......:.......:..........�- -..:...--- •��t•-- ....- ----........:.......:......_ : : : ,'r' : : ; : : -�• ;--....: � - X;•--�'- :-�-�---;--�-• -; �-�- ; ..-• --.... ;-�--• - .... .......� ... . : .......:y�-_.-- _ ...- - . ..... ..... , ....__; .._.. � .......:...... - �-X--�- �•----:........:- - ..:.. --.:.-• --:... --• � - --� x x . . . : . ; .. . X . . . . -�- X: .' ... : ...... . ...... : ... . : .. ... :. ...... . .....• : � -- � ; �-• � ; : . : : : : :, . �X . ... ....... ....... �---.......... ......- -......_......_...... 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 X=1000 Sq. Feet Gross Floor Area X Actual bata Polnts FRted Curve Fitted Curve Equation: Ln(T) - 0.87 Ln(X) + 1.01 Trfp Generatron, 8th Edition 1218 700 800 900 1000 """'" AVerage Rate R2 = 0.78 Instltute of Transportation Engineers Detailed Repoi�t Page 1 of 1 HCS+'" DETAILED REPORT Genera! Information Site lnformation Analyst RP fnterseotion DREW/HAMPTON Agency or Co. GCC Area Type All otherareas Date Performed 1/20/20J1 Jurisdiation CLEARWATER Time Period PM PEAK Analysis Year 2095 WITH PROJECT ProjectiD Volume and Timin !n ut EB WB NB SB LT TH RT l,T TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Number of Lanes, N� 9 2 0 1 2 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 Lane Group L TR L TR L TR L TR Volume, V v h 14 885 92 19 979 8 357 2 89 4 0 27 % Heav Vehicles, °/aHV 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 4,90 0.90 0.90 Pretimed (P) or Actuated A A A A A A A A A A A a a Start-up Lost Time, (� 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Extension of Effective Green, e 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.Q 2.0 Arrival T e, AT 3 � 3 4 3 3 3 3 Unit Extension, UE 3,0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.� Filterin /Meterin , I 1.000 9.000 9.000 9.000 9.000 9.000 9.000 1.000 Initial Unmet Demand, Qb 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 Ped I Bike I RTOR Volumes 0 0 20 0 0 0 0 0 30 0 0 10 Lane Width 12.0 92.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 ?2.0 12.0 Parking 1 Grade / Parking N Q N N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N Parking Maneuvers, Nm Buses Stopping, Na 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Min. Time for Pedestrians, Gp 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2 Phasing Excl. Left EW Perm 03 04 NS Perm 06 07 08 G= 7.0 G= 38.0 G= G= G= 20.0 G= G= G= Timing Y= 5 Y= 5 Y= Y= Y= 5 Y= Y= Y= Duration of Analysis, T= 0.25 Cycle Length, C= 80.0 Lane Grou Ca aci Control Dela and LOS Determinatfon EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TN RT LT TH RT Adjusted Flow Ftate, v 96 9063 29 1097 397 59 . 4 19 Lane Group Capacity,c 317 9666 328 16&2 347 398 335 396 v/c Ratfo, X 0.05 0.64 0.06 0.65 1.74 0.15 0.09 0.05 Total Green Ratio, g/C 0.63 0.47 0.63 0,47 0.25 0.25 0.26 0.25 Uniform Delay, d1 7.4 15.8 7.3 96.0 30.0 23.9 22,6 22.8 Progression Factor, PF i.00Q 0.803 1.000 0.803 9.000 9.000 1.000 1.000 Delay Calibration, k 0. 9 9 0.22 0. 9 9 0.23 0.50 0. 91 0.11 0. ? 9 Incremental Delay, d2 0, 9 0.8 0.1 0,9 93.4 0.2 0.0 0.9 Initial Queue Delay, d3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 O.o 0.0 0.0 0.0 Control Delay 7.5 13.5 7.3 13.7 123.4 23.5 22.6 22,8 Lane Group LOS p B R B F C C C Approach Delay 13.4 13.6 110.5 22.8 Approach LOS 8 8 F C Intersectlon Delay 30.1 x� _ �•75 (ntersection LOS C Copyright � 2007 Unlversity of Florfda, All Rights Reserved HCS+T"� Version 5.3 . Ge+�erated; 1l20/2011 7:48 AM file://C:1Documents and Settingsirpergolizzi.GULFCOAST1Local SettingslTemp\s2k60.tmp 1/20/2011 Two-Way Stop Control Page 1 of 1 _ _ _ _. TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information nai st RP Intersection DREW/BAYVIEW enc /Co. GCC Jurisdiction CLEARW,4TER Date Performed 9/20/2019 nal sis Year 2095 W1TH PROJECT nal sis iime Period PM PEAK Pro'ect Descri tion EastJWest Street: DREW STREET North/South Street: BAYVIEW AVENUE Intersectian Orientation: Easi West Stud Period hrs : 0.25 ehicle Volumes and Ad'ustments Ma'or Street Eastbound Wesfbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R olume veh/h 927 20 23 595 Peak-Hour Factor PHF 9.00 0.96 0.96 0.9fi 0.95 1.00 Houriy Flow Rate, HFR 0 965 20 23 699 0 veh/h Percent Meav Vehicles 0 -- -- 2 -- -- Median T e Raised curb RT Channelized Q � Lanes 0 2 0 1 2 0 Confi uration 7' TR L T U stream Si nal a 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R olume veh/h 989 118 Peak-Hour Factor PHF 0.96 9.00 0.96 1.00 9.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 996 0 922 0 0 0 veh/h Percent Heav Vehicles 2 0 2 0 0 0 Percent Grade (%} 0 � Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 � Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 Canfi uratian LR Dela Queue Len th and Level of Service pproach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L LR v (veh/h) 23 318 C (m) (veh/h) 697 362 v/c 0.03 0.88 95%queue length 0.?0 8.51 Control Delay {slveh) 10.3 � 56.0 LOS B F pproach De(ay (s/veh) -- -- 56.0 pp�oach LOS -- -- F Copyright � 2007 Unlversity of Florfda, All Righfs Reserved NCS+T� Version 5.3 Generated: 1/20/2011 7:65 AM file:!/C:1Docutnents and Settings\rpergolizzi.GULFCOAST1Loca1 SettingslTemp1u2k6b.tmp 1/20/2011 Twa-Way Stop Control Page 1 of 1 __ _ ___ _ __ _ ._ TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL. SUMMARY General Information Site Information nal st RP Intersection DREW/BAYVIEW enc /Co. GCC Jurisdiction CLEARWATER Date Performed 1/20/201 ? nal sis Year 2095 Wl7'H PROJECT nal sis Time Period PM PEAK Pro'ect Descri tion East/West Street: OREW STREET North/South Street: BAYVIEW AVENUE Intersection Orieniation: East Wesf Stud Period hrs : 0.25 ehicle Volumes and Ad'ustmen#s Ma'or Street Eastbaund Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R oEume veh/h 927 20 23 595 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 0.96 0.96 0.96 0,96 9.00 Hourly Fiow Rate, HFR 0 965 20 23 699 0 veh/h Percent Heav Vehicfes 0 -- -- 2 ° -- Median T e Raised curb RT Channelized D 0 Lanes 0 2 0 1 2 0 Confi uration T TR L T U stream Si nal 0 0 Minor SEreet Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R olume veh/h 989 918 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.96 1.00 0.96 1.00 1.00 9.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 196 0 122 0 0 0 veh/h Percent Heav Vehicles 2 0 2 0 0 0 Percent Grade (%) 0 o Ftared A roach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 � Lanes 1 0 9 0 0 0 Confi uratlon L R Qela , Queue Len th and Level of Service pproach Eastbound Westbaund Northbound Southbaund � Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L L R v (veh/h) 23 196 122 C (m) (veh/h) 697 294 575 v!c 0.03 0.67 0.21 95% queue length 0.10 4.49 0.80 Control Delay (slveh) 10.3 38.7 12.9 La5 B E B pproach Delay (s/veh} -- -- � 28.8 pproach LOS -- -- D Copyright � 2007 University of Fiorida, All Rights Reserved HCS+T^� Versfon 5.3 Generated: 1/20I201 t 10:48 AM file://C:1Documents and Settings�pergolizzi.GULFCOAST1Loca1 SettingslTemp\u2kBE.tmp 1/2012411 Detailed Report Page 1 of 2 __. _ _ _ _ _ HCS+'" DETAlLED REPORT General lnformaiion Site lnformation Intersection DREW/MCMULLEN Analyst RP BOOTH Agency or Co. GCC Area 1'ype AI! other areas Date Performed 1/20/2011 Jurisdiction CLWTR/P!!V CO Time Period PM PEAK Analysis Year 2015 + PROJECT/ 1lVIPROVEMENTS Project ID Volume and Timin !n ut EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Number of Lanes, N� 2 1 1 1 J 0 2 3 0 1 3 1 Lane Grou L LT R L TR L TR L T R Volume, V(vph) 356 50 481 32 65 17 292 3396 36 30 1564 264 % Heav Vehicles, %HV 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 Pretimed P or Actuated A A A A A A A A A A A A A Start-up Lost Time, I� 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Extension of Effective Green, 2 0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 e Arrival T e, AT 3 3 3 3 3 3 4 3 4 3 Unit Extension, UE 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Filtering/Meterin , I 9.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 9.000 9.000 9.000 1.000 9.000 9.000 Inifial Unmet Demand, Qa 0.0 D.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 a.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Ped / Bike I RTOR Volumes 0 0 80 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 80 Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 92.0 12.0 Parking / Grade / Parking N 0. N N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N Parking Maneuvers, IVm Buses Sto in , Ns 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Min. Time for Pedestrians, GP 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2 Phasin EB Onl WB Onl 03 04 Excl. Left NB Onl Thru & RT 08. Timing G= 33.0 G= 1Z.0 G= G= G= 7.0 G= 40.0 G- �22'0 G= Y= 7 Y= 7 Y= Y= Y= 6 Y= 0 Y= 6 Y= Duration of Anai sis, T= 0.25 C cle Len th, C= 240.0 Lane Grou Ca acit , Contro! Dela and LOS Determinatlon EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Adjusted Flow F2ate, v 272 142 4�9 33 83 296 3502 31 1596 208 Lane Group Capacity, c 473 248 567 89 90 759 3420 52 2579 1062 v/c Ratio, X 0.58 0.57 0.72 0.37 0.92 0.28 1.02 0.60 0.62 0.20 Totai Green Ratio, g/C 0.14 0.14 0.36 0.05 0.05 0.22 0.68 0.03 0.59 0.67 Uniform Defay, d� 96.9 96.9 66.6 � �0.3 993.5 77 7 39 Q ? 15.9 �2 3 15, 0 Progression Factor, PF 9,000 1.000 9.000 1.000 9.000 1.000 0.354 9.000 0.754 1.000 Delay Calibratfon, k 0.97 0.17 0.28 0.9? Q.44 0.19 0.50 0.19 0.20 0.11 Incremenfal Delay, d2 1.7 3.2 4.5 28 69.7 0.2 21.9 17.3 0.5 0.1 Initial Queue D�lay, d3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Control Detay 98.7 900.1 71.9 192.9 183.2 77.9 35.7 932.4 32.4 95.1 iile://C:\Documents and Settingslrpergolizzi.GULFCOAST1Loca1 SettingslTempls2kA9.tmp 1/20/2011 Detailed Repoi�t Page 2 of 2 _ _ � Lane Group LOS F_ F_ E F F _ E D F C B ; Approach Delay 85.2 963.2 38.9 32.1 Approach LOS F F D C Intersection Delay 44.6 x� = 0.94 Intersection LOS D Copyright O 2007 Unfversity of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS+rM Verslon 5.3 Generated: 1/20/2011 8:41 AM file://C:\Documents and Settings�rpergolizzi.GULFCOAST1Local Settings\Temp�s21cA9.tmp 1/20/2011 Two-Way Stop Control Page I of 1 - ,:: ;, , . . . "� �N�.i �f{(IUIJU!�( �lU�. 'Mi:`;.. � i. ,.'-� 5�,: t /i;'%"f �� U ��.�.U�:;�i, ( . f':. �? bit-1 �:if.C:r': �'i(.� �:- �'= _..... . . . ..... .. ... _. . ..... TW4-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY �`` � �"''` � `� °f` '�►-.;, General lnformation Site Information nal st RP Intersection GULF TO BAY/BAYVIEW enc /Co. GCC Jurisdiction CLEARWATER/FDOT Date Performed 9/20/2011 nal sis Year 2015 WtTH PROJECT nal sis Time Period PM PEAK Pro'ect Descri tlon ' East/West Street: GULF TO 8AY BLVD North/South Street: BAYVIEW AVENUE Intersection Orientation: East-West Stud Period hrs : 0.25 ehicle Volumes and Ad'ustments Ma'or StreeE Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R olume veh/h 22 9396 8 3 2093 215 Peak-Hour Factor PHF 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 23 1495 8 3 2250 231 veh/h Percent Heav Vehicles 2 -- -- 2 -- -- Medfan T e Two Way Left Turn Lane RT Channefized o � Lanes ? 2 1 1 2 0 Confi uration L T R L T TR U stream Si nal 0 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R olume veh/h 5 0 12 6 0 74 Peak-Wour Factor PHF 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 Nourly Flow Rate, HFR 5 0 12 6 0 79 veh/h Peroent Heav Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Confi uration L.TR LTR Dela Queue Len th, and L,evel of Service pproach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuratfon L L LTR LTR v(veh/h) 23 3 97 85 C(m) (veh/h) 183 474 184 957 v/c 0.93 0.01 0.09 0.54 95% queue length 0.42 0.02 0.30 2.72 Control Delay (s/veh) 27.5 12.6 26.5 52.2 LOS D B D F pproach Delay (s/veh} -- -- 26.5 52.2 pproach LOS -- -- D F Copyright� 2007 Unlversity at Florlda, All Wghts Reserved HCS+rM Verslon 5.3 Generated: 1/2012011 8:46 AM file://C:\Documents and Settings\rpergolizzi.GULFCOAST1Loca1 Settings\Temp\u2kAF.tmp 1/20/2011 Two-Way Stap Contcol Page 1 of 1 Copyright � 2047 University of Florida, Ail Rights Reserved HCS+T� Version 5.3 Generatea: ��zur�u� i a:uq Hnn file://C:Wocuments and Settings�rpergolizzi.GULFCOAST1Local SettingslTemp\u2kB4.imp 1/20/2011 Two-Way Stop Control Page 1 of 1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information nai st RP intersection 8AYVIEW/DRIVEB enc /Co. GCC Jurisdiction CLEARWATER Date Performed 1/20/2019 nal sis Year 2015 WlTN PROJECT nal sis Time Period PM PEAK Pro'eci Descri tion East/West Street: S17E DRIVE B North/South Street: BAYVIEW AVENUE Intersection Orientation: North-South Stud Period hrs : 0,25 ehicle Volumes and Ad'ustments Ma or St�eet Northbound 5outhbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R olume veh/h 29 217 5 5 43 0 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 23 249 5 5 47 0 veh/h Percent Heav Vehicles 2 -- -- 2 -- -- Median T e Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 1 1 0 0 1 0 Confi uration L TR tTR U stream Si nal 0 0 Minor Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R olume veh/h 90 0 38 5 0 5 Peak-Hour Factor PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR ��0 0 42 5 0 5 veh/h Percent Hea Vehicles 2 2 2 2 2 2 Percent Grade (%} 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 1 9 0 0 9 0 Confi uration L TR LTR Dela , Queue Len th and Level of Service pproach Northbound Southbound Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lan� Configuration L LTR LTR Z TR v(veh/h) 23 5 90 900 42 C(m) (veh/h) 1560 1320 654 594 9022 lc 0.01 0.00 0.02 0. 97 0.04 95% queue length 0.04 0.01 0.05 0, 60 0.13 Control Delay (slveh) 7.3 7.7 10.6 12.3 8.7 LOS A A B B A pproach Delay (s/veh) -- -- 10.6 11.2 pproach LOS -- -- B B Copyright � 200T Unlversity of Florida, Ail Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.3 Generated: 1/20/2011 9:i2 AM file:l/C:iDocuments and Settings�rpergo�izzi.GULFCOAST�Local Settings\Temp\u2kB8.tmp 1/20/2011 r�: 7'his Instrumcn! Prcparcd By And Rcturn To: Ricardo L. Gilmorc, Esq. Salem, Snxon S Niciscn, P.A. P.O. Box 3399 Tampa, FL 33C01 00-113093 APR-18-2000 11:46Rn PINELLRS CO BK 10861 PG 2115 � �� {�� {� �� E� ��{S� � �� ,'� � �� i _ �� __, -- � _ - ,` _ ``� �i . � ' . Property Appraiser's Parcel '. � Identification No.: 17-29-I6-00000-110-0100 - - � �� .�� ` �> i �� i , �� , THIS DEED WAS PREPARED WITHOUT THE $ENEFIT OF A TITL�$EA�2CI��E' COMMITNIENT, OR SURVEY. �� ' , � - - � � , , , � , , WARRANTY DEED =. THIS INUENTURE, made as of the,� day of Iylarch, 2000�iset�yee,�iCleanvater Housing Corporation, Inc., a Florida not-for-profit corporation, �Jhi�s�.��dressls 2Y0 South Ewing Avenue, Clearwater, Florida 33756, as GRANTOR, to th� Clearvt;atei; i�ousgng Authority, a non-profit . corporate body and politic pursuant to Chapter 4��; �loriaa �fatutes, wliose address is 210 South Ewing Avenue, Clearwater, Florida 33756, �s t',3�ANT�E. �� ; �,� ��: ` Witnesseth that Grantor, for gaof� and va'�uable�consideration, receipt of which is acknowledged, grants, bargains and Sells to Grantee a11 t�he real property located in Pinellas County, Florida, more particulazly describ'ed as; � -' PAGF:,; �� - - �CC�i fiE:C:?� ,` �-J U� , ,' `, ��2 � `� — t �.� � � 3E� EXHIBIT "A" ATTACHED ��' --� �-- �� HERETO,AND MADE A PART HEREOF INl _ __ _ _ . FE[:� -_ _ .... � il.? " - - N��,• .� together with afil�en�anents„Ire�editaments and appurtenances thereto, and all covenants, conditions, RL-"v restriction�, easements� t�ghis-of-way and other matters of record. TC)T�,' (; ,• � , ,' ; . �� T"ahav� ar�d-Co,fiold, the same in fee simple forever. CK t �� I�Gh„F, ��Y, � �-- -,� �� -''-- ` �. .;-�rid_�r�ntor hereby covenants with Gi•antee that Grantor is lawfull�seized of s�i�l;la�}dY�,r�-� T; �, �fees�ila�le; that Grantor has good right and lawful authority to sell and coqvey s�id la��d; aiid�tl�8t y� � C�r�ntor liereby fully wanants the title to said ]and and wi I1 defend the same a�ains�ihe law�u�'xlaii�ts� `_; of �11 persons whomsoever. ,^� z, �� - `; ,-, � �Q� � � �� -, - � / T� \\-i j ;� T .i. v..�� ., i .` _- ^ �-- _ _ � ._ -» y; . i, m a�z� �-, .-t '" r'i � ni f�_. � � ? �=� r.n . = l' '-.�l `7 =p �� f" (TI i.� '_" ` Ti� .. ?- �r� �n � _! �- .� G'J 1- �t ��: i m ini �; �N . »i `n':_n i .,a �n 3_ i - '.:� �_� i ,.� '- _ :_ __ i � .__ - r� r .. : D ��F� � r �. � „ _... VJ 4 �� `, i� _L_' � - 1-' nl �A T �D t- � D �� r= � -r� � �xi -=+ 0 � THIS DOCO!ffiiT OR A PO OF THIS DOGD!ffiiT IS OP POOB : QIIALITY AI�ID 2�AY BE ILLEGIBLE. � ' PINEL�RS COUNTY FLR, � '' QFF,REC.BK IOB81 PG 2117 I' _. ,� . _. _ , , �� ' �� __ �-;.� _ �, � • `, , . ,� ! � . __._ .... � • i, � - . . . -�,', ,\�� .� i �XHe��IT � ; ; , , , �- � , , ,, , -- - _ ,; ,' ' �-= ► ,- ,-, . � . .._ _ _ ..._... . . , �, , , . i _ . , ,, . .. . . __ � � 1'Dso itostAust qaart�z o! th� tbrt�ast,gut�etar o! e�olion i9. i u ` lo++ri�1�iP a! rotnb• ltangs lE �aab. Lbl��p �XC�fT,�h��lfozsh I ' 80 !�t o! Wts if�t o! eh� 1tl� o! .Rsotiotr �7. �ip 2! �oaeh, M�►q� l6 �at !or rlqht-o#-way �'or.c�w �triait'1t� 11�� sast »- I tpt o! tts� 1�f o! !he lfs� o: ssd,t`�r ir.�i�i2�l,p Z! butA, � . �o u raee l�or si4ht-ol-waY lor, ayw"tsv �ivd.. a�i iXin� _ . _ . u�e bw� !a tsa.2�t�s a�o,ush►R :,lorsa�. .,�bi�ot eo �sso�al►t . lro�a ChRtt�� Oon�r�e s�- e7ult� �o�ia. hts �tii'�, and ' J�es ilarkiA' snd feai�.a-11o3��n. �bh '!a. to th� Mty o! Cl�ar- I �ratar. lar nsilisi�a,; drala�aq��l�stitlatia� and �i�aaeo� owt 4b� �e�h 10, la�t ��sd e��; fkst 10 l�at o� tlf� ltt� oP tA� � �'o! qoliott 19,� '�b+�aonip Zi .Qouth► �gs' 16 �RSt� liaal3si Coun�►, Y2ori�!%i = : . • ;. " - , ', � ;, Z -_ I ,' �, � I , ,' , � �� i i , � i i � � _ � � ' ' I _''-_ I �� `�� i � ' �i . . . . . .. � ,;�,-��., . .. . . . .. ' : �::r .. � . . 6 Z � Q � � O W Opd U O �" � � � t1') `� N W M � ~�O zO-m J Z � � � 0 � �o�� T� �� . �..�� .��. � � ti�� I � i � �O 23„ � 26.5 i � � ry�� x x � 28.0 x 272 � 23" 2.0 0 22" %2�.8 x28.9 " { I O 30.5 � I TOP OF GRATE �10" ; i ^ I I ELEV.= 28:26' � x 26.6 ! v4.,5�. � �c' 4 ' 1 ;f, --- � x r , � � i, 4��4�. �; '' I ; , } � �, � X27.5 i , N,�-----1 4� "28'6 SHOWN PER CIN OF CLEARWATER , � �26'� � 4„ 30.5 ' STORM A7LAS (TYPICAL) x 2� 6 x 2 3; : � � I { 1 w QO 24" ,y � � . M� 4:: � xti�� I�zs.$ � 6.9 � ORAINAGE MANHOLE + � O 5^g° � I RIM ELEV.=27.23� �� `5. � �� X �6. � 1 4� 4� Z 5" 0 9-4� X 28.I x 2$.8 x 28.7 '`l'^ � Q��g�� 91 x27.5 ' x26.6 ' 'L DRAINAGE MANNOIE I RIM ELEV.=28.32 ��" �--- 1 � � - ♦ � SCALE: 1 °=50' � MATCN LINE `�'�- , SEE SHEET 1 OF 2 0' ,o� z5� 30� ,00� ...._.`.�.r. �_.�...�_�__._..�..�.�_--- --�--, ------ .�_._.�.��.�.�..�_� ,,-^-,,� � - � ' ' 9x ` I. ��E i;� X29.3 l ' ' R,0 � . � G� �22'6 � . ,'� %27.8 ; ; , . �, • x 23.0 ', i � � i 7W0 6"V.C.P. 28J f 23.3� " , 9 �70" ' �" ;ii !�� i t ,' ' ' x29.2 x29.0 � 'L1 I �11'" �9 9,�9�.+ii i�� ;':: c � il � S t22.2X z23.1 x2�:.2 x24.� x24.9 x24.8 *24.1 x23,8 � � ; x29.4 � " x`�' .1 t 8.1 x28.5 1 2;.U= ti. �i i ,� 23.8 %28.7 x28.4 x i � � i +'i j'I i.' i SANITARY MANHOCE� � 1 � ,� 1� i � ' ? 28.2 '�•27.5 x27.5 �8�� x29.7 � ',{ ": ! �i� � � RIM ELEV.=29.05 x 29.0 � ; ! ' ; 1, j : x 28.0 x 28.7 � � iii i i?; ;' �'' INVERT N=22.52 "U" TfPE CONCRE7E j j x � ; i � o g� i�; t i�i i- ( iNVERT W=24.12 ENDWALL (TYPICAL� 1 � 24. 7 x 24.7 ` 22.7 j� � 21.6 ; �i � %y0 r �, ! • i � j;( INVERT W=25.54 ' 28.7 '22.8. i� 3d" R.C.P. x25.0 "24.9 � _� � � ; t�t � 'i �,�I x24.2 x23.3� i ! '� S INVERT ELEV.=21.95' • � t ��t INVER7 SE=22.47 j •� �+ �23.1 . � �' - ' � g � �j ' ��' f: I '` � ; � � x � + ' i, ,. ! 1 9• `�� l'� 1 x 28.7 1 �. ': �, x 25A � � x 23.1 � x� ; � '!� �^ � I t.7; 1 � � , . t r„ �� ;: , � %20.9. , �` x29.9 � � � ! ��i �� 28.5 , ! 1� x29.8' � Co i:� • ��_ � dL � ` �, �'. � x 241 x 24.8 � . ' � x 29.3 � ,y�' 1 i ' �i: x x 28.5 x 29.1 x 29.3 i 6� � A ` .�� r , ' x29.6 2 8. 4= � 2 7. 5 Y 2 7. S.2 Y 22.5 � � x24.6 ; �22.6�21.6 `ti ' �' � t , x 29.4 `9 c. 29.3 � � 23.4 x I i � x I '� !i� i �26.4 � ,,k22 5 x24.6 f� ,: r; 23.0 � 1 ti�� ; x.. I. ��? �;; �, CHESr��PEAKE STREET 26.Ex z�.z�2s.3 � \ z�:,,,� ,� ; � � � . �;; ; __ , � , \ �� \ ♦ � x 24. t . � � x 30.6 � � 0`•1' I �'J ��i� � >�'�,. k � cj � \ x23.0 ( ! x J z t i% '� �� 28.4 � ,r' ,4 � � x `�, �\, ' x24.6 ; / � ; , i 1+ 9 ; rc._1.• � K28.4 x23.1 ' � ' � t,- � " 'ir�'-�:� . '��' 11 ! il l � � �p '� : / 27.2 .� �� \ \�'x23.1 X 23.7 z 23.3 x 30.5 � I t a � 27.8 � �\ � '�22.6 � .x 23.2 J, ' x 28.9 x x ! 11 " ; � � t�i t % x28,0 x27.3 , `�,k . x24.2 � �� ipQ�` =30.2 x 2 9. 4 28.5 28.7 �27.8 x27.9 x29.0 �6.,5f. :,� i•. � x27.5 27.5 �1 \ TOP OF BANK ' 'S�� -x21.9;�g�' x27.5 � � j x29.0 x29.3 x29.9 ' �,f.\5��5^g••' �• X2b.z ." '\ •, � xz3.s �oF ; F xz7.s � x29.9 f1u� W �'�, � ORAINAGE MANHOtF - '� �i% \ \ , • 1 ��: �� / , O x 26.7 �27.9 � � � i"�, 1 i � t I ! 28.7k `x22.4 �� 22J � i��c. x- 28.0x' � �� t Z i j� p 28.3.�y....__�- -y 7 7 "�p^ ) RIM ELEV.=28.34 \ ,22.7 . �� , 'h `� , • � �`t � kx23.1.�_ i i � � O• � ��i� �� S TOP OF GRATE -�...` X23.4,: .� . I I 12" � �' I i �'� SANITARY MANHOLE ..-+�23.1 I x 30.4 I I `� `�,\ RIM ELEV.=28.93 _�f-ELEV.= 28.18' 2�4 "'--------_.._..__ •_�-�22.8._..,_--'""` x x23A .-�� ;` y �27.9 5 CONCRE7E � ,t�ii�� t � (' � 14"Q. x29.3 �` �. INVERT NW=21:69 x ` 28.4 -- 282 S� X , . . ___ �... x 29.1 G' �c28.7 �- - -'- • � x`�' t . F �. !. . )y ss.� � zz.a r-__._ Q. x_...___ =-': �:::.� "'21 J �--x 23.5, " -x..,,�28.1 0• t DEVJALK �' �, 8.. � a c}, i � �.. �. X28.9 x?.9 � ��c27.7 �',• _«.24A- -.._------x•23.2 �- '- 25.9 X 6.5 x28.1 i �'� 9 a: INVERT SW=22.79 �i.a21.9 x � � ! 028° 6"a° �L 2 "27:\ '• `L INVERT SE=21.69 2 � � �. " X ORAINAGE MANHOLE s, * � x 27.3 � � i � RIM ELEV.=28.62 �' � x 26 8 4/ ' 'ZJ 6 x 28.9 x 28.9 28.7 x k 28.0 i x 28.9 �-� ��' .�%i � � %'•: i � I _� .� � r_5"5" 30.4 � � •. • x2�.& K . X29.6 X2s.7 1 "2$•5 x28. x28. MIiERED ENp SECTION '•, �. i "29•g Op py I r,fi 10"13" f` �PQ +� ` x28.7 - , w29.8 `� x ^ 0 45" 30.1 .- x� } �`�',yi � i: INVERT EIEV.=22.36' ' x,30.4 � � h' I MITERED END SECTION • 30.4---- ,\x :x 29 3 ! i � x 30.1 �. �; �,� 90 �'•, 6��9p�9} � ;�,.�.28�.7 INVERT ELEV.=2).99" 30"x42"R.C.P. �x29.7�28.1. I 'f'i B .':;c• K29.5 INVERT EIEV.=2i.84' , ? j � x�ry A� ��p,•5•• j � �'�� x29.3� '9! 9S ��x26.7 __ - x � x28.3 � k : ;q 'i !: f � 4" ��•� � �. \ x30.3 29�t � �O �k28.3 t 10" s i�+ �''� d- r 5.. !�6 29.3 X 29.3 ;,` �� X x 28.9 ' RAINAGE MANHOLE S x'29.4 t ` X`L� `x [tf.4•-------x 28.7 �'j t { '! �ii I. �: X27.4 • RIM EIEV.=27.04 �i '^ ,1 � p �•. X+ x 27.4 o x 7.4 1h '�.` x 29.0 x 28.7 ,c 28.5 x 29.0 x 29.9 X 30.0 • 0, 1,0• ,y�i• X N .. � �'c �' . � 3 x31.0 x29.5 � 1 9 � 0" ti� �� Iif � � �1i '° 1` x x `L x x x ! 10"6 � � z x`L . �o � S-, 29.3 29.4 x , W O J '1 �� .. . x 29.3 29.2 « x. n 28.9 N '1 � '� �. � . 28:7 27.9 x 28.5 p� , a `Y '1. xry `O' k2 3 ?y � ! x28 4.�.------__x = 29.5 �y3 �1 � ��` � ' ; z� �- 5� � �, �. ry �� k`L •°� �,o X31.3 - i28.7 g o,`•�' n282 � 28.5 x30.0 M xx p 12°6" . �r, W W 6•, °L x`4 " ,\ x`1'�\ �� , ,�29.5 i , ryo�• x�' O � x28.2 � 0 '4 '� , � �.. x � �� P5�� 4,.3„ 9A.9 � 12' p DRAiNAGE twfANHOLE� /x� x 28.0 `Y�� a N 29.4 � Y x�, �L i � � .� 1�� w-D- x Y g• x �i' x 0 . �: f ❑ RIM ELEN.=27.51 '�c26.2 �'•.. 0� . .� i,� �� X x2s.� � �. ry �• -� 1 O I33 + R/W i � o �i..� 4" � o �s" � / � ..,\ ti�" z�.sx �� x Xti �� '�' :.._ o x28.a� �• , `, " Xti "zsz x2s.s "28.8 x2s.o ; ; \ ' � �; R/W WIDTH NOT DEi'ERMINED d- X30.1 29.2 �` y x28.4 x27.7 � o x 4 x 2 6. 6. 28.9xx x29.0 � \ ;� 6••6�5"9° 4; ZV. � � K i � � t :•1 w� 12"QO 4" �� x 29. t i , f /a �. r,� � �,� � Z .- � � � �\ �i' � x28.8! ! i � t J V r�� j � 1 04NER POLE /'� `� DRAWNGE R1ANHOLE `L °�' x 2 7, 828.5"29•1 >-29A w TEMPORARY i i, :1 -� �MITH EIECTRiC � `. �x25.8 RIM EIEV.=26.63 ti x 2 8. 7 28.8x x 2 7. 9 N i ?' t �'�• i • ( TOP OF GRATE - x25.8 �-. z ` p��g" �PE[1ESTAL � � ElE1�. = 26.61 � � �¢ � 27.8 X 29.0 6' CHAIN 'I� �'-� t,] <i D R A I N A G E M A N H O I E ">' �. I a w ! x 29.3 X ry x 29. � i 2•.9.,5" '`� SANITARY MANHOLE a x29.3 IINK fENCE i , i, � � �\ R IM E L�.= 2 9. 4 4 SANITARY MANHO L E >- a� x �� '� � �#� SANITARY MANHOLE '� �� i�_. a ftIM ELEV.=29.06 ��^y � � ' �' ''� �' '� INVERT NW=20.73 a RIM ELEV.=2$.72 � � �- 29.8 p� � h X`Y RIM ELE�/.=26.68 , x`�' .. iNVERT 5=20.21 � o¢ I "� I �i� , W , X 27,g INVERT SW=22.66 v ¢� j � 2•' �� }2" ; DRAINAGE MANHOLE ,J�26 �•� ., x27:4 INVERT 5E=20.85 > INVERT 5=24:87 � O � 'i �� p �. O ■28.7 X RIM ELEV.=26.84 25.96 x27_5 � � ( c� INVERT N=25.22 �; � h in 29.6 2 5` RAINAGE. MANHOLE x g INVERT W=19.68 +�. 4" � "29"0 x28.5 � 2. 5 28.6 I ? INVERT N=19.27 ; �� RIM E�EV:-26.70 9-� - I ,o ;�1� i iii INVERT N-21.67 a 9" CONCRETE ^ � X27,7 x26,6 G' x27.3 � �i. FOR TEMP. POWER BOX INVERT W=18.90 4 .,K ■ 28.3 �/ / , �� Q � * 28.8 28.3 j� 4.,x4" WOOD POST ' ' ; �_ o,• x g.4 g,px �... \ J� G x INVERT E=19.65 K' xry % � UNDERGROUN� GAS ? �APRON � ry / DRAINAGE DITCH 803TOM INLET � 26_ 1 6.60 �O �"' 28'6 " ■ a' j � � 12" 28 5 � � INVERT E=18.94 v -DRiVEWAY 015" 1.25�W. X 1.05'H. WIER �� 26.52�-;�2 26.87 'QA 28.2 � 27.9 } 27.8 x 29. t � 29:86 i '': DRAINAGE JUNCTION BOX � � OPENING IN N. FACE � '`� g"�.�,p � ! ELECTRIC 9.5x "2g,2� MARKER �' ,� ;i�,,;.�_� '�i � i / RAINAGE MANHOLE S ; 7RANSfORA�ER h �'� r GATE 0' WIER ELEV. = 28.51' i . ` .. MANHOLE RIM ELEV. = 30.45' 29.0 +x`Y R►M ELEV.=26.52 '`. �`+ x26.9 SAN 10'V.C.P. 10'V.C.P. � 12'V.C.R i�� N� EAST INV.(36" RCP� = 25.91' "�': I '' 27.3 - Vr-�- i�t GRATE ELEV. = 29.56' / � ' �y0• x • SqN � 12'V.C.S�18 18"78°i4 `b�' .� •r SOUTH INV.(24" PLASTIC) = 26.92' c��29.3� NORTH WV.(12" PLASTIC} = 26J0' / / " `• . x28.0 in i � .� .?�� itl � x 29.0 x 28.6 "�`4 � `\ \ ST � x 28.4 x 28.9 � x 28.6 °' � 1 � � ' E Ij ti' 6,. * 28.6 x 27.9 / 26.7 • x 26.9 x 27.1 �? � � ' r I;I ��' � 1 x26:1 x 1 i 28.3 � i � � RIM ELEY.=29.40 x x2�.2 / `•,� t %2� 6 x � ; , ^; � �,� i�� $ANITARY MANHOLE 4., ��. � 26.7 x 26.8 �'�.. S RIM ELEV =29 45 i '• ■ 28.7 28.3 x x 27.5 � x � x�• , r ��I � 11! ,I o x27,7 27.6 :��' : i�t INVERT N=18.48 � �-.�-� � 7.7 INVERT E=20.56 ; � � { ro `LB� x 2$.90 ; J� !b fi% - � '� SHOWN PER CIN OF CLEARWATER ` � O 0• x x �:i � ,�� NVERT W=18.53 '�, , i � � STORM ATiAS (NPICAL) x 27,2, ��•` INVERT NW=20.55 x 26.6 ��6.9 ' � ` i xy�� x�' �9•�� o: �> ��I ; 4� INVERT 5-18.42 � � k2s.s z�.8\ � I i > '14y' i:� ,,; '�, k27.1 , x 28.2 ! � N i ' i �� INVER� N=20.18 ` 29.9 / / x 26.5 � c4 X 25.7 x 28.4 � i , j � i� ��! �� 2.5• � � � I � x 29.0 x 28.2 ■ 27.5 � � �� `� \' x 27.2 ' ' � ' ,'t ' CABI:� BOX x28.1 i �• � ) o ��" � � � h x27.7 � � � ; x27.4 x ; � 0a �. ` �0., . � ,',', � x x i �i �' �y 0- i;; � RIM ELEV.=27.14 , x z � ! �1 :�•' ' '�'i � �. x �q x26.4 �. �� DRAINAGE MANNOLE � � 28.1 2$ � 27,6 13"� �y � ' :I I � � ti � � x 26.6 x 27.0 x 27.9 i27.1 �x27.3 ; ; 28.0 x� 27.4 � x 27.7 x`�� x(L R � 2„ ( � I r � If x / � i 1�°�'- 27.23� K 7.22 ?�26.6 i % ,+0xz7.5 "�8" � �72'y �� ; I;1 � � / � � � 27.3 x`t' ��''�x.27.0 ; 27.17 x 26.3 1 � x k27.4 f � � , -_.__ ,c.� ` , �i�.o � �s��2��is'Qo>>" ��•� ��i2" �� '? EAST FACE OF 8" CONCRETE 30.3 / 'y ..._ .__.__-•x. _ x. � � 28 OS �� Z�� K=' " ;- I;; . ._..-- 6• �� -x26.&_____..-�x�26.5--•y��------•---�•26.3_____�..i �26_43--x26.3-----_._. . 26.3 x•26:6- -___ •-x 26.5--_..__-°- -- 26J-_.._.,._.._____._...x. 6.9--�- �'x 7 77 ,.�.-x,.__ � ;�-0- ._.. � - i 1 � �L 'L o a '0 27.4 27.3 0, p 2 27.0 2._:.._�__:� _-�r.�x:27.80-==�-."`-27:92--x-2B.03.,._._--x.28:1'3---------- 28 17 BL'OCK WALL IS 0.3' WEST OF � �' x x '1 1• .-x->x� x �o '� �i o '� 27,q ' --- x- ">°-"k=" � #S �, 1Y,17.. 6 �. � �. 0• 0• ti 5 � �y`O� °' �• ��1 �o• o �. 1• gf% �• 27.88 �y 27.86 28.03 h �•'.._ � !;� i PROPERTY UNE � 1❑ C, � x � �" " �,." x / x �• x ¢ r- r_ ;� �. p O '1• x � x`t' 27.8 �27.5 �. �� .�. x 'L`O� x x�l. x ry x x4' �,'1. x�l. x ��. y �y0• x9. 28.1 ;t i. ;�� " 4• �L �o• �L 1• R. z w 29.3 x 28.1 x 28.3 � `L � x x x 27.7 27.3 / `L '� 27. i `b " X ROADWAY �ASE 0' �� • �; , i ry�' 27.2x x x26.8 � 26.7 26.6 x27.5 x28.4 - J'� LIMITS OF�� O x x`l. th �¢ � if �. I I` x � / x27.6 �"` �.x.2g.7 MATERIfAL ASPHALT PAVEMENT `t' `L � i;i �: C s'i cv 011" � � --.....-- . .. 26.6------_._._..-----_ _----x26.1------ --x'�::>� 26.7-_�__._._------'--___�._.._. . '� � � h� i ,� , � .. � _ _ _ _ _ - - _ _ -�, Qp. 23" � � __.�x , 27.58 _ _-.� � • '= 2 .c. � �_; . I � �27.6 26.3 , . �`� ....x 26.3-----_ _ ----.__- --x 26.5--- �---.___ x -- -�-- --------x-26.8----°----- --x•27.1--- •27 3- _ . _. .27.53 2 � N � 'i� �' - -- _ � 26.86 26.9 - x_..�._..._.....__°--==T� 777�-= .�x_ 7.86�._�,_._.»=w2$:Q1--------- -x 811 .�. o x 27.9 26.94 �'. 91 � 12" �' �. '' • ;i� �' � � � I •27.8 �12.. � � �� ; � f." •:I J I R � f / � X26.7 x x27.0 �� 13 �14" �9�� 4�.. � ; _t � Q13� � 26.9 %27.3 x27.3 �l 10"�ra ` L.,'. .I a i I I 32"Q ( 1 � DRAINAGE MANHOL t � ; I � f ` �� . / 0 15" �' .�; I�i �` t :.-7 v, '\ x`ti � � RIM ELEV.=26.88 � QO 17" �p 27" x`� 12" 1;; � i �� o � � _ SAN [i SAN 2� MIAMI � ;�� ' � ^� d. � � � � � � x29.6 x27.9 k27.5 �26.1 x26.4 x26.9 x27.8 x28.2 x28.1 x27J CURB �� ii �' i�` �•- y DkkINAGE MANHOLE(CONFLIC7) �15'� (�� E ( � � / � 26J8 - � 13" ! i 'i � � i ; Z RIA� ELEv.=28.�6 � i' �• i � / 26.01 � i ; i � w O M + 26.79 . N.W. INVER7 24" R.CP.= 22.51 �,� � i � i �~ � � L�- s 5. � � � � � DRAINAGE MANHOLE ,p, TOP OF 8" P.V.C.= 25.80 , ° r- I `A SITE 1NSPECTION DID NOT REVEAL 25•89 � RIM EIEV.=26.77 � 6' CHAIN ' Y��B�� i j � w w � / 8" P.V.C. IINE PASSES THROUGH MANHOIE, t: � �-- - -- - - - - - - - --�' / ANY ABOVE GROUND EVIDENCE OF UNK FENCE . ' + 1-�° _ � N OETNL'A' f g THE LOCATIONS OF SANITARY / ��2°.02 PRESUMED TO BE SANITARY.) ----_-_---_-.---.-----_---•.----------�--„--- .------ �� $�� t- > NOT TO SCALE 0� STRUCTURES NORTIi OF THE � ,� 26.79 ' � t ' N � xry CONFLICT MANHOLE SHOWN BELOW � 26�� % ■27,3 S SiDEWALKT�i• � � 1 O SANITARY MANHOLE O i ' 4- O %27.9 X27.7 � I � i � 28.3 K 7.8 � 27.5 RIM ELEV.=28.95 '' 29.5 x 28.0 (�� x 26.3 26.80 x26.3 X 27.5 x 28.0 x 28.8 x 28.1 2 � X 27.8 x 27.4 10" CLAY INV. ELEV.=18.03' N "� , 8n � ' � `� ,N 1i7.2 � x 27.9 "' \_ 6" CLAY INV. ELEV.=24.99' (W) {UPPER) ,; 9" � � � ,' z\ I � � i TOP OF GRA7E 0 20�� ; EIEV.= 27.10' 6" CLAY INV. EIEV.=18.63' (W) (LOWER) ,;� j '• � � �RAINAGE MANHOLE � / � i (CONf'IICT STRUCTUR� / � . � 12" C�.I.P. PASSES T ROU)CH STUCTURE N-S i 70" CLAY INV. ELEV.=17.93' (S) I ' i ' w � i �' t- Z x 28.9 x 29.0 x 28.2 x 28.2 X 28.9 x 2 ��p�8 � i' t Q w � I = v � . RIA1 ELEV. = 30J'f � � :.<!��$�. � � �''� � L i S.VI. aNV. (36"/kCP) - 21.59' . a9.. � � � W DRAINAGE JUNCTION BOX , ,�,�,• N.E:. iNV. (36" R F�= 21 J5' � � i i i'�- � �- ° MANHOLE RIM ELEV. = 3i.32' I � X TOP OFk12" .I.P.) = 22.91' •`�g�� * p � (A) NOR7H INV. (24" RCP) = 23.26' X 29,g / x� x 26.6 a 26.4 x 27.3 28.0 28.2 x 28.4 x " � . � � ° 8 NORTH INV. 24° CMP = 24.45't � � �' � 4 X27.6 , 15•. °�. x x 2g,4 TOP OF GRATE TOP OF GRATE TQP OF GRATE 0 ,�t r ! � t{C) N.E. INV. (36" RCP) = 21.59�t / / TOP OF GRATE TOP OF GRATE TOP OF GRATE TOP OF GRATE ELEV.= 27.88' ELEV.= 27.77' e�E�/,- 2g.24' R, :��7„ ' � i � (D) SOUTH INV. (36" RCP) _, 21.60't 72" �DRAINAGE MANHOLE (SANITARY LIO) EIEV.= 28.26' ' MARKER `� �� t ELEV.= 27.90' ELEV.= 28.25' ELEV.= 27.89' � (DEAD) 10" 0� '�20�� UNDERGROUND WATER ::� � � � a (E) SOUTH INV. (24'" RCP) = 23.34" �72" I i //�� (CONFLICT STRUCTURE) SANITARY MANHOLE � � 9u � i i i �' .0 72" D.I.P. PASSES THROUGH STUCTURE N-S _.�--- �' V � I f RIM ELEV.=29.95 x 28.7 x 27.9 . 28.1 X 28.5 x 28.2 : ��p� �,, '' ' SEE DETAtL �A� / RIM ELEV. = 30.69' �-� x 28.5 28.4 x 28.8 x 28.6 x 28•8 x 28.8 x 28.6 29.0 28.5x ::F�1 g" � I• 1� ° �� ,� S.W. INV. (36" RCP} = 21.63' (N) 8" V.C.P. (PLUG) INV. C•LEV.= 21.00' x28.9 =28.5 � i � � � a �y (E) 8" V.C.P. INV. ELEV.= 20.84' SANITARY MANHOLE '•.i r• I , � (SANITARY I.ID)DRAINAGE MkNHOLE ,y0' N.E. 1N1/. (36" RCP) = 22.01' (W) 8'' V.C.P. INV. ELEV.= 20.92� ' THIS SANITARY SEWER LINE IS CURRENTLY RIM EIEV.=28.92 �'! i � � RIM ELEV.=3i.26 " TOP OF 12" O.I.P. = 22.88' CONVEYING FLUID, HOWEVER, SAID fLUIDS DID NOT SANITARIY STRUCTURE 6" C.P.P. INV. ELEV.=26.72' W 9� � t � � o SOUTH INV. (36" RCP) = 21.52� { � X28.5 X28.8 "z9•0 APpEAR TO BE RAW SEWRGE (IT IS POSSIBLE THAT SANITARY MANHOLE �) � , J . I X30.8 "28•� x28.1 x28.i ■28,2 "28•5 "28•4 RIM ELEV.=29.56 {NO TOW OR RIMj (CORRUGATED PlAS17C PIPE) i ; �` v N.E. INV. (36" RCP) = 21.62' GROUNDWATER INFILTRATION MAY 8E THE SOURCE TOP EIEV.= 28.7# . i y i. (E) 10° V:C.P. INV. ELEV.= 19.38� 6" CLAY 1NV. EtEV.=26.59' (E) ;; �g' � NORTH INV. (24" RCP) = 23.68' I OF THE FLUIDS OBSERVED). IT IS UNCLEAR AT THIS (W) 8" V.C.P. INV. ELEV.= 19.45' (N) 8" \V.C.P. (PLUG) INV. ELEV.= 20.6't � � r Z DR�,INAGE MANHOLE(SANITARY lID) TIME WHETHER OR NOT THIS LINE IS PART OF AN (E) 70" V.C.P, INV. ELEV.= 18.6't ;;�; � ! ' � SANITARY STRUCTURE ACTIVE SANITARY SEWER SYSiEM. ° SANITARY MANHOLE H S --�29.4-SAN RI��t ELEV.=31.88 � SAN SAN {W) 10" V.C.P. INV. ELEV.= 18.6't •g" • (NO TOP OR RIM) WEST (15" CMP) INV. = 25.77' $AN � SAN SAN SAN SAN O�' 32" :,�� j , RIM ELEV. = 28.97' M - 70P ELEV.= 31.6't 09 ��i O� SOUTH (15" CMP) INV. = 29.18' 0 0,� o, , � ,y 0 � SAN i (N) 10" V.C.P. INV. ELEV.= 17.82' o (N) 8" V.GP. INV. ELEV.= 22.8't 4•'7^ �'y �y x'y X x`ti x`L o�• '� '1 0,• oy �' � S 1 m (E) 8" V.C.P. INV. EIEV.= 22.7't � � � SEE DEtAIL „i.'�� x ry0�' x29.8 x SEE DEfA�L n��'� "� x`�'� 'L°' 'S� k29.5 �y°'� `Y `L x' 28.5 8.6 84 � X2 .3 7 8,. ... . ELEV = 17.75 :, .. _ x x2 ;:. ., � in _ . 29.5 x 29.8 �i ^� ' x 28.6 � 2 V.0 P INV ELEV. 17.72' x x x X 29.3 K x 29.0 x x 2g_g x 28.6 x 28.3 �« 28.4 x x x 2 8 x 2g '.i �� i (W) 10" V C P INV ST x 29.7 % 28. x 29.3 `� x x '� .- :' � � , x30.7 � O 21" 0° 0. a h x x x � x �+• 28. 7„ N x 31.7 x 31.6 30.8 `L � R, �y ` ' � r 3 O29" •�3Q.8-___ . ,___ ..-•----_-X30.7 r , 6' CHAIN LWK FENCE .y0• ,y0' �0• `� I•-i I j � � > 322 x x 32 0 . �_ 10" x 29.2 ., -�. 7�. � ��• x 28.1 x 28 x 28.6 L nDn 2� 8.4 x� 28.5. ";$ ! . � •- 32.0 '�- ._._.____.___ ___._ 36" .z SEE DETAI :. ____ _..._...___ ___, __�.�___ .._.._.�_� , ._.-.-----.----..__..._ �� OR4INAGE MANHOLE SANITAftY MANHOLE LID EIECTRIC x ' 'v� �� '-'� '�'' --`-- \� .� � j "� `� ¢�_'_ u 32.6 x x 32.5 � � 6' CHAW LINK FENCE %30.8 x x 8"---- • s" 4^ �� __ ° "32J 30.5 x30.8 30.6 30.4 12" 30.0 29.9x 29.0 x29.1 � � 5" 70.,5•',� 9"6„5"4„4" ..t t TRANSFORMER • � �> > x29.7 x 28.3 6X t<��' t �0 33.3 x 33.1 x 32.3 !�IM ELEV.=31.80' 29.6 �y.o x 28.5 x , � I Os N 89 32 34 W 1355.67 (M) XZS.o x2a.s xza.s x2s.s x2s.s � 4"� �o . 9'• j, � in x X xg2,p $.E. 1NV. (36" CMP) = 28.20' OVERHEAD 0.'�_SANITARY MANHDLE 6' WOOD x2g•Z =29.0 � 6' WOOD fENCE 6' CHAIN LINK FENCE . SANITARY MANHOLE. 4"� �'�' �� ' VIRGINIA AVENUE `� 33.3 "31.8 SOUTH INV. {6' PVC) = 27.20' � + �:,`,� 7" ; �� Y � SANITARY MANHOLE ELECTRIC THE SOUTH LINE OF ?HE NE 'I 4 OF 4"P.V.C. RIM ELEV.=31.29 FENCE � Q12„ RIM ELEY.=29.88' � ;�.:�1 i . 9'- � � � O EAST INV. (i5" CMP) = 24.68' � , Q 33.1" X3i.81.5 WES7 INV. (42" RCP) = 21.45' RIM ELEV.=37.34 x31.1 •31.2 ' z d O(� NORTH INV. 36" RCP = 21.45 THE NE Xl 4 OF SECTION 17 30J5 SANITARY MANHOLE i':_ i � � ) 31.0 30.6�x�'`. , RIM ELtV.=29.48 p026" 0[]24'. � 'x 30J2 ' ;11i i i � ° �� 32.3 31.i %31.2 X31.3 x31.2 X31.4 x 1.1 X31.7 x31.4 f ,' T ' ' ' � �B x31.1 ■ o � M W 31.7 3 X31.5 x31.1 >37.2 �x3 50 30.2 X29.9 "29.4 x29.3 x29.2 , 28.7 x x28.1 X t::i � � � � � i:.i� 1 � ( 31.5 RECREATIONaI VEHICLE / 30.5 x30.a x29.1 x29.1 X29.t x 28.5 "28.3 x27.8 28.1 1:� F � i i o O'(' SEWAGE PUMP OUT STATION -� x Jg,4 � � = o � w OWNERSHIP UNDETERMINED • ' ' + i ° M � (PROPERTY APPRAIS ER'S W E B S I T E D O E S N O T C O N T A I N A �` � W �- V J Z � o m o� �� ; COMPLETE RECORD FOR THIS PROPERTIES OiWNERSHIP HISTORY.) LAURA N. CONNELLY, AS TRUSTEE OF THE LAURA NALL CONNOLY REVOCAE3LE TRUST `y pO�- Y � N � o Q �-, . • .Ta -. - ? �------. �-----------------� FOLlO #00000-140-0110 �-- - ,- --� . - ------- � m o 1 � Founo s/e" IRON R00 � (O.R. BOOK 15350, PAGE 947� � ! Y 1 � z� Y v? m � , 1.2' (2.2'I�t - 4.4'W) � � '• � N J 0 � n 0.3� �� FOUND 1/2° IRON ROD "L8.5408" 6' CHAIN LINK fENCE I FOUND 4'k4" • f � o ( CONCREiE MONUMENT 0.6' i� I o J O O I �'S�'� � 0.6' -- ENO OF 6' CHAIN LINK fENCE , � �"'� m I 0.4' 0.3' � � BOUNDARY uNE FOUNO 5/8" IRON ROD j� � BOUNOARY ItNE 2•�� y W 4' � � . � � 6� CHAW LINK FENCE BOUNDARY LWE � 9. � Z o -� O F'OUND 7/2" IRON ROD "L.6.1834" ( f-.-- 4,5' {pN BOUNDARY IINEj ' o I 6' CHAIN UNK FENCE � � � n. U' � � 0.5' � 0.6' �- 6' WOO D F EN C E I ( 0.2' i � I 6� CHAIN LINK fENCE � 2.7' � �w Z � � 5.,�- � � ,o � ° t 0 Z`------ - „----� �-- -- DEfAIL "E" ^� �---- -- - „-„--�� -� NOT TO SCALE o DETAIL "C NOT TQ SCALE DETAIL 0 � NOT TO SCALE 1 � UPDATED BOUNDARY SURVEY ANO TREE LOCATlON .DATA, SAMPLED/SUPPLEMEN7'ED .GROUND SPOT ELEVATIONS AND UPDATED/YERIFIED ACCESSIBLE SANITARY .AND STORA� QREV N0. REVISION OESCRIPTlON uu�s Ktr �vnnru�tu d7: DMD fIELD BOOK & PAGE: 04/05/11 DMD/89522 17_29�� CREW CHIEf: �JL REV. DATE URAVIN BY / EMP. N0. SEC-TWP-RGE DRAWN 8Y: OMD � � � �. .. j son � er ♦ New Directions In Planning, Design & Engineering. Since 1956. 2205 NORTH 2OTH STREET - TAMPA - FLORIDA - 33605 800.6434336.813.223.9500 • F813223.0009 'PROJECT �NilsonMiller,inc. . CeAificateofAuthorizafionN43 • FlLic.#LGCOOD170 • www.WilsonMiller.com �I;�2�; BAY CARE HEALTH �YSTEM, INC. 5610381 1561 i� � 20o BAY CARE HEALTH SYSTEM, INC. ��TA50'ALE: CORPORATE HEADQUARTERS ICAL SCALE: N/A BOUNDARY AN� TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY 215610381 iASK: CROSS REFERENCE: 2�0 04370-000-000 ,NSI/x 215610381-SU0I.DWG SHEET NUNBER: 2 OF 2 � � 7 ! �r �._.�... � ; t. � rr�� 1 <<. � SITE BENCH MARK THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE �:� NORTHEAST 1/4 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 �- -- , .��'�. - '; `� SET PK NAIL & DlSK IN PP OF SECTION 17, TOWNSHIP 29 SOUTH. ,�� i ; � ELEVATION = 28.30 RANGE 16 EAST . ` � � ;'>; N >>>o3.sss2 FOUND BRASS DISK '•. e� �, `� �. ,' . z'. E 9819�6262 � . • ^^-_ , . jl ; � n Y� ._ . ,.� (^ ; ,j � '•;�%'" �,� �� '•: ooao-ase � "PINELIAS COUN'IY ENGINEERlNG DEPT. i . S •` i� .� � i t �r r? � �_________"____�_� ____��_�_�_4��_"__'_____.......__ _ :. �� . � . ��, 1 1 � , . , ..., \ `. . .. .. .. -----°__----_.__---•----------------------- � -4J.•--------.-•/° �j_--•__---_.�_.._....__ c Yi SANIIRRY MANHOLE .• �. �, ;� � ., �t.._.._.____..._,.._...___.._y.-_..,._.�_.__�_ -.� _._.._..__..�_.�__�_;,_,__._.__._--•------- - - --- -----• . � . ____.____...___.---•----._...__.._.__.._.__._...- - - � ` � RIM _._..___....._. ,- _..._.._.___.._-_- � ------------°- - �--------�-• ---•--- ,. � _ > - .i'"i \:� � .. ., ---___ ._...__ . _ ___..._...... _ . � - i -----._��'----•------------'--_._---�---�--------^-------___._._....--"__._.�----`-•----------�-- --'--'--- z_..._.___._. _____.__�.__._. . . .. . ' - �� r _... .. - -'__._.,.... •_ '-"'---'-"'" i� ��...o.e._��....�.,-- - =-----u- _-,-.- - - -1 , , ELEV 32.58 �'� / . :`'� - ----•-•---•-_._.......__._..._.....__._._.-----._..._._.,.. .__.._._ ................... . __._.,----._._____.._.. ,� _.�..._.._�_---- ---- -.-..--�_-,.�.....��--- .....__v.__._ ._. _�_... _ _ ._.. _ • � , ��, - v� _....� --•--_____.. ° � � -.......-•----....__. ._._._._. -- ............._._.,.---•----�.--•---.__ . _ - -,r- - - - ..... _> .a..._ _..........._ _ - �......,�� _-., : �...�.�. �. o �.,........_ _,e„�........... - - �.. .. . _ . ... . __.__._._.__....____. ..__.�....---._._._......._--.__. ,.._. ' . � ^Y'^ �. ::' � ;, / ,• ... .... • . ::�_ .. -..rs� �m+... . . F...a..«.a...s..w.....�a...w _..__" _ ,. ._ ./ ... _.. - �. . . ._. _. ._ '_ " _' . . . � .� . �, •. ., ::. .. �: �. '�.:-. '... d✓CSf �i`[TC:.�u.4 s . _ , '___' __..,.._�......_._.,.......-..__._._._� _ _....�.....'"'_-.."__._ ."_ "'_",....__'__"'_""'.'_'"___...._ �..._"__ W. ��'�.��'..'�.��`��.��.��.�.�.��.�.��...�"��.' �.��..��...��.��.J".,.�.T�� •�.� --••'�'.�a.+.s��1.z'cT.r.M1+.^� �- �.�. +�efrA��.Tiav.w#�.�. I\ L'�� • �_....�__.-.__�...._.._.-.�'_� .\ .�r.�,��_.�_�...�.�.��.�' "'��'i� �Y w �. .�...��.�.��.�.��.�.��.......��.��.-.�.� �.��....�.��'� �..L�.::�.�� '�.�.��'�� ' . �.��w:.:aO:ic��-..�.�.'��. ..��...� ...."�. �... . :i�V. � !Y �(. . �"...�.__.� .._.�. V .....��.,:_��....�._ �..s.Acu.u:� i .�v..�:z5.9 . ,�. . . .s .� W.,. �- ........:...w . ,..E _._...�.��arz..�-----,L_��== --- - - ..... . -- -___. . �.. .,:r- :. ., ... .,.. -• -• •- ----...__ .,ww ...�,..,.. .. . _ _ _ ...... _.._...... . _._._.__. _.__._.._._._ . •......,,_,: . ,....,.. .� -:. . . . _ �,.. , . _. .. _ .:. . u �._.,. ;. ,. �.. _...�.:.. .._.._..---......_ ..._�:_._.......__._._._...._ ..:.............._ __ __ ._ ..._. �. � .. � ..� �s_�.�z_.�s�uu�a_,_._r_....._.�.� ......_....._--- � �_.__._ . _...,..w,��..,..w..:, :w,. J +r� a ..,...�� _ -- , .��- . .... . ..... �..�__.�...__"_.._..__.�.-._r �`�.___"__..___...._.__.........._..__�_...��..�^__ ._ ��i. "' _�_ '^_"..__��_:__.., ...s� n.......a.r.�w.. _.. . ' !� . .�-• -� •', .._. e.......,..�..w�., e......�::.,... ._ _....�:.�...-. ._... .. .._LL..'�..,. a ' "� . ...:..,....._ . . ...-.....� :: ` ._�__ - . . � . . \.....__.._...._:.:.._ \......._`.9 .,._ 1 ..._ _._.._....._ __._ .�> .,.... _........_ �:�........e..:� _......,..� ::...-... . .. =• __�... _..__.._.�_..._.....r ..,-._.� ._ .______..._._ti._._._.. . ^ � --' _ .. . �_.�._._.__...--•-_a....._..._._.._ . .....z_:_.:: �.�� -� ' _ -- - ' c' - -'- - -' - - - -_ ' - - - " ' --- - '_. ._ __ . . . ..._..�-_._... . �.�..: ., ....... ... .. .--' --•'-' ' "'. _ . ��^ ...-,:v.:.:,t.�.':,_:�.w,c:�..:+.d.`c-'.a.:,..:.::.��:...,.�..L:...<a5:m: '.nn.'o'-°"...ri+Gn:<•:_::B:r.:",� .v:�ii3�:F-r»:"'= .. ............... . " "_ ... _ ....; ' •"". . ,. __._' • � . _ ...�..'�... .. . `' ..�, �� ...._....__.."'_'.._..._.�__,._ _ .. . _ DOES-NOT@ONN�C'F��DIRFCr7�`k�--EfN}'F�ftkP-..__...--•--._..._.. ,..a....,_..t..�.r..-...ti_.�..s.:��....�..:�r:J_�:�_=ti�_•:;:-..-_:........._.........__..: _....._._.__..........._---.._.___._.._._. . . _ ,_,_ _ •�,�..__....o,..�.._:�..�,..�..,..�__,.......,.... _�_ t i .....__._----___..:........---_...�...____._._..__....__.�_�.__�_��,�.._�.__n>n.�.R�.::x_� . .. .,.� - - - -- - - - -- � . u�P_.�=.nr-=�.- ,_ = . - _. _�_. _ .. _ .--� - ---��-- - --....-- --- - - - - - - -- ,.�.: _ ............ .:�...�_ ,:r...,...� _-.�.. .� c._�_._ _........._.__.�__._�a_._. __ .._. _____..._._._-•-.-.-.-- --..... ..�.::.....�.� .�.... -.m.. _ . ..�.Y.�� __..,___�.___.. ___..,.__.__...... .-.--.._._� _ ._ _ --�----�---�-------- r a_._ts=_:_=�,_�--._._..�_ .---._......_......_� --__..._.____-•---...__....._._.._._-----.�__._.._-.-----.._._.._._._..._.._.-.--.-.-----._._.__...______.__.._____..--.----._.__.---•--__.___.._ -.--_._____---__...___._.,....._._.---.-----.--.__._.___._._..____._-.-------..---.---------.___ - - __.___.---•---------------_____ � 6" CIAY INV. ELEV.=26.06' (E) ---°-°--- _.�..._=�=_-_ ' _...:.�== __: �__.�____ -_._� ---------°-._._._..---___°---.._.._______.__.__.__ _ PAIN7 MARK �NDICA7ING r � � ,�:�= <:_.-�--.�--�•- ______---°-...____------------..__.___....__._.___... _.''•--------- =- --�--...___._._.__•--° _ fi'._CLAYJNv:��,�V:= 26.06'-- W __.•-•._._. --. -• -. -- __ _ 'POSSIBC�-COCAT�ON--• - -_ _. _. _.._ _._. . ... „ - �.) �• 4 P.V.C. INV. ELEV.= 28.73 (SE) __.._.----.-----.._.._--.--.-.:•---°--_..__..._._�..._._._ . . / � . ... -- ---• --- - - �---- - � ., _ • .- �:��•• ' _._ _._.._ ,_ _. __ _ OF UNDERGROUND -�'HE°•NORTFi•-L-{F�}•E--0E-�TkiE--PiE--•1_..-4.-OF--�- - _ .._._...----..__._.._.-------•--�----------------------�---------•---------__..........----------.__..._._..__...._____,.__.,. __ _.��_.._� _"'�_.. � .�_�.�. ,4 '�...��.� � . ✓ :� �_ � _ ........��.�.��.� �. -Y--y- •--•--•--•---•.-.--. ANITARY INES 4" P.V.C. INV. ELEV.= 30.33' N � � -- -------------- ..._�s_�.�.._��._.r---�-=__-__�_��:_�__�_-�.::��_,-_,-__�.�::,�::�:>_�'�___�..--�.r-_z:-��•:_::_::- __---�----_,.:-_•_,.....__ -�_..._�, .• S L -•-----�._.........._...._...._ � ) ._.._.__ ----�-- --._._...-------••- ---...._.__._. ______.___ ---1__..___-_--_--_--- ...._-.._..__.__._.: ;; THE NE 1/4 OF SECTION 17 ._ _.. _....,... _.... .__ _ .._._.... _..__..__ __•�:.-.::� -: -<�<..:_.�:�-_.,_:-_.:__::-.::_:.�.::�.._:.,...< _..._..... _.- :: . .__�______..._.------•-•---� �' ___._._.. _ .-� �._.__._. . ... _,:-._.,:.:.- :,._: . ...... - - _ _.......-.,:.,.�_:-_,:: � -:.:.-_....__-._T .._....._ _::��:�_.:._:...,:_-_� ..______._..--�-�-----------•-- ._ .._ __._:._-. �__...:_�_..:___:___..__..:-_=--�_ _ ------�-�- - > � ---•--- _.�..__- -.....:.. _. _ - --- _ __ -�---� --- --- - -- - - -- - -•s"'�"r.`^_m �_�.__.....__.�__.,."__...��__^_".._..___, rr.=,+�_' '__ ...._" ___.' _.. "'..__..:.. __- " ' _ '_ - ... _�:s.! �_...__.�__`.�..._.__....,�...__'__"' .. _-._.:�. ....'_"'___._z_��-._.�_. _ _ ._ .:. -..-._-...r. � - r_...,"'_z _'...-��-. _. - �/-� "'�"._��._��.��__�.__... --" ....._._,_.. '> .__..."""""_'" "'" ' __.. ..'"_"_""' .� ..._....�'_""'_-._'.-� _ `�"'....�__... .._' .............. __........_ j ._._.._._ . _ � .-.._�.�..: s:.:.�s "'"v"" : .... ......... . .. ... . . . .. .. . .. . _ __ ....._ "'� .. .. .__.__ ._.__.�._...._._'7' ----..._...._._._._. ._.. . ... __ __ . , . _.. ..._. _ �: � N H MA K ------� • --- �.��.�....� �� _�..� _ .. �.�__ _ .��Z.' � . i .��. �a�a�..es.�A._�w.....�x�s.axv�e.�..�-t�:s��.-.�a" Ja.-.dx�s�w�an.o.�-aeir:k G.�• � /! _..s..-�_"�_. "..___ _.'."_...._...__ J._..- ,.__...._... -----•.- �' --.._._......._._...__.__...._.__...___..._....__.......____.___....... .. ._. _. ' "� FOUND BRASS'D15K- �,..x:�� --� --... _._.._ ,_.. ..�."'.^_..__......�.....--.. l/ __._._._.,...__._......�."_""'_.�_.__.,__..._:.::.:::�+.:._�......t��.�:..r.�..-.�,�.....-....-....,<.s_-:��..�..'o--__�'__' ""_" '_.__._._..."""_ . .. .. ... .._....__._ __._..._. ..._..'"'_.._...�..,_._....."___._".'_'.�.___""'._"'.._""'__.._�_..______"�___^_____""'.___,..._ •/ � "q' _ �� ' ^. .. . .....�.:s._..�"'.�.s..�..._�._._..-.__..::::-::.5'�,__...,._......_ ........... ......................... � . .,�..._,.._..,.._._..,..._._._�...�........_.___....•a.t.�::�na..v:.�c..-.�::::_.;._•:_.m,:�:_.:r'•"'c:_�._ccc'.c"<:::.-.::.rc:-...•:-_;.:�:�::.:._.;__, .... ............_...._ .._"__'ti�..._...._ _...._�.,._...._,...""�...._.__.._,.��_._�_'_'�'"_"""'____'_' '"""'.__""'_ 5 CONCRETE . - - - • - -• - � ---::.. - . - - � . •_ . -_ _ ' - "PINELWS COUNN ENGINEERiNG DEPi." ..._...�.. �-:.-.��....:._.,:_:.-_- - - -- ' --_�.-z--. °S ANIiARY MANHOLE.�__�.�v._:�...��:�._y.s�aa.<�..-•��.,:..�__-.,-�_�„�::_.,-_-•,�r._:..-..�. -----.___-----------'--_- � _ ------'-°_..._.._...-'-._._.__�_.__..._._ .._.__.___.______-•_----•.----SIOEWAIK _ - ---___.____�_.__._._.____ � (� �/ - - - - -.�-� - �--�------------:----__.__ _._.-----.__._...----._.__-- � STREET _. -a: - .,-:.:-�. ��.y'�� . �y=:.: �. a.� ��.:�-��r -a. �v2 -e. -are � .v� v v� • - � -.w �.y� _ y n i� 2 VALLEY GUTiER P -•------____.__._.-°°--...._._._._..__.. , N E F CURB RIM ElE1/.=29.75 � __ - -• . ... .. ..... ... GUARD RAIL % TEMPORARY BUS STO .......__..______.__.___.__._..__._._.----�---• ----_ ._.__...__._.,�_.__...----._ .............--._..---......_1../.��..!_---._..__.-•-•--------°_•--•-----•-------°-----�• ' j�/ ITA � ,%/ NEVk534759��- , � � � ._--- ................__.__...........p.-•--�--_......__.------_. SANITRGtY.MHtJd41.�_R��_____----------°--�---- ------•------ 'f---•-•--�-•- S_RIM EL�/ 28A5 ---•---_ ---____._===_ _= - .ryn - __�____�_-.:--.::�.._-..-�__:::•---.-_----.5'_:CkIA1W_._.._. _._....,.-• ----._. _..._.____.---�---___._:_- ---/ (CONICRETE SLAB) • ' " 1D0.�0 RIGHT-=OF-WAY O EIEV.= 29.82• ------ - -----; -.._�..__.----•-------- - ------___ __......___.--.------• --��--•-•---E_19490.0000.______ _.,.:=�.__==--==-__-------��€�iiG_ . _ ._.-------... �_._._-----_- = =�=-<_ ---�---�-„___-_= __ -=_:a=.h-_a_�_-.��.�.:.._--�---- -_ --- - --_---- --_- ---- - - -- - S 89 y5 40 E 1366.�6 M i _ - _ __... .. .___.._ ..._... ---..... . ___._.__.__--: __._.--- --._... h ^� r 0 . . r---•.. ��_�-_:;::..�__.�,_ �:>.r-:_:_ _�.�_� .. .._ ..:_..:.:.:._�•-'..;:-.:_--.:�_ _. _ '-' -= c c" - " - - - 0090 35A -----------.._._._...__. n ._IElR FE C �. � .� - ... .... •- ::-::::_ ..... ..__.�- -- - . _. . . _. .. . ..�. . ....:_ . �.....__= _...._ __ _- .� ,:_.�. -�_.__..::.:_.. � _ �_::_::��:___<:_......._.....--=--�•--� - -- � -------------�----- -- .._. . ..._ ... F . • _ h ._ t- . ..._.. ..._:.: : � �� ...........:. _�:_:--::- ____-:__::<.:-:.::_.:::-:.:__-...�:__..._._.................__.._.___..._...---..........-.--._.....----._._----...-- - .� _-::._:.____,...__._ ._.._..._._._.._...__._._.___....__....---- -- - � . _ �..,.___. ,L�-- ' � :...,,:.,..,...�...,_.._.:..,---•----�.�.__..__:.,.�---...___=:_M-�-__�:.-.�__::.:::_.:_�:_:..-:::_::�:::_:.:�.::::::._:_:_:::.>:.-_....._.....---- . __._........__....._. „��o•""yF37.�'h_._ ...__,y�O--•�;•-��o�g�-•---;---� 'y=m--+�361. �-, i ....................in._._....._..._._.__s. _..__-_�.--_.__�-_._r.._=---_�_ -- --- ----- -- - - }�� zs_ . .a � . . r , � ._.._ ,,..�.�.__.__.__. __.._._._._........ •34.fi BASIS OF BEARINGS ----.�-_.�--=-•--_,__=_=�_z._=-_- - -- -_ - - - - -- --- - � � -.«�.� "�'�' .-`�' . . . �. . � . : • . ( ) - - � - -. _ -_-_• --� -_. - - - - - - - -- - - - - - -- ---- . ... _. ..._. • . ...:.. ... ...... �_ . � �•�. - --�-- ==-- --=-j- - .. __. _ __ -_._ - -- --- -._._..�___ - - - -- - _ - - - - -- - -- - - . . �.._ _..._ 6_�. . ____._ - _ ..__-•. --- . . . . .. n. ,� - . ... . _ _ .. _..... .. ... .. ;,:�'� __ - - - - t8- ^� , t�" 1 "r;- ,.._� �'-._L35J _ �____�_.�_�.._.____••--- _.��_-_---__... . . .. . . . . . .. ...... . . .. .. ... .. - .. _ � _. .. .... �.�'=" - - - - - -r. - - -- -- -- - -_ __ - - --- - --- ; .YO . , � 6 � �.� '-r'T'7U `L .. .. --rh.-� �ir/+e=Ic� � , . ... '.o � � • 6Y.C.P. :----. .... _ :. . _..... . �:.. - - - -..___ - . _____--�- •c ....._. '"... _... _. . ._. ..�_.... _. �._. .,_�. . .. .. .' '" _. . .. . .... . ..�. .,_ - -:'.._. .. " "' ... . . . . . , . , � �---A � _.....'..__."_........_.�_.._.. S__. _. ' ' . .. ....,... . . . : _ .- _-_ 'e.:_. . .. .�,f�,.�,� .__.�..... •"_'._._ .r;.T..._�..�___..._-._._. r'_'._....... _._..........._._"'_ ." ' ._.' . _"...._.._._.__.'_'._.. ._...._._.._� _ ' '_'_" __.._...�_•__..__ __._ . .� + . � ��bi��j��"��` � , '�^ $'y�,y'h�,y • „ �«3 .S�H-3 . 38.7Q1`�`+""- r ._ _.. _.�_ ,y'�._._._r;; � -Q� �n -. ...._. �f. . . __...__�.___T_.�_ --.�.tif �"._.._.�..__..__._ ._........_ - ;�!_....._......_...�. .. ' " -i`�r�-=.�w�.:e.:_':� ==-=.'i'1'�:� � . 8'V.C.P. - -- - - - - - -...� � .i'�� L � � 'h 'h' �`�'h 1�`'� ^�,._----'c t4 , r, k � •�j .. "•____a.�..y.; ....o..Y....w.,r,-. -_._ 6' WOOA 'h. ' ,y:` 'y �0�24,• 1• `I�• � � 13" . t. . 2 � a ' 6 b� . 1 s~`~ � ;. d� 1 j 31.1+�*��+`...0 O �ii....r.29.5 oi:.�� oi._ 29.5 �azrr�u�a..�,....d... _ ,�,,.., _»�.� . _`� iS�. ..�� . .0 I 12' � x 32.2 O x 31.9 � 17" . 37 .2 i O'x 30.5 x 31.2 30.4 -y ' 'L 'Y .. Y ` �+� ,��r29.3 0�i29.2.�.r. ��.,.,.... '�'S-' 'S '1 • " ,3`�0.2� x x s 0 y ...�.. 'y��r.28.5 'L 'L • ""'" .� L2 p X�j � �p X "� 11'� �¢"�11" •, , � � ❑ �12° ,`O k37x �- �h� :7 x x x`Y �y9• �,oi' ry°+ 28.� x28.9 , , �; •:/ + , x x �l. 28 9 •.�.R .�.�� "�y, Ni PENCE ' �y � 17" p • y t�i ,� �12" ❑ x 37.5 21" 6' CHnIN " " " `�9� x � ' �5. t 23" �y ( � 22" � � UGHT POLE 5' CONCRETE �j � x ; � „ ,� I , 14" 13" 'y . 27. � ;i� 'h �� r� �10° �12° I� k�� t1' t2' s � �p , 012•� 5.6' � x ti o• � i_ • SIDEWALK � ' :i 32.9 .yrc20° � w��'' �") •tj`LQ2..3..yry f x.y1 12" O O5„�� O �� 34.6 � LINK FENCE ' i J�' , i i 9 y� � i j� a C� �j 'SANITARY MANHOLE� x 0��' Q'Z,5" �f 30.7 �0 ✓ �� j I�i � 'h�'� �" � `� ' ,�• 'h�'� " RIM ELEV.=31.44 , 31.3 23�� x Q' X�L � h i�s j " g`y' 'b�� g1 �� .� j� x� " uNT TRAP PER ATIAS f �11" \ °i %30_3 c,' I I ,:, � T�}E OP SIOPE � i� POWER POLE � � � �y�' .a• ( SEE DEfA1L pf» i i� fOUND t/2" ROD "G.F.Y. L.8.02t" 1 �� ' I! WITH CABLE T 4" Pv.C. INV. ELEV.=29.62' (N) � tit x i 1 ;i; , £AST FACE Of 8" CONCRETE h# / ELEPHONE BOX � X3i.0 x30.3 30.0 x2g.7 a x x , 1 O �.• � I 4" P.V.C. INV. ELEV.=29.72' (S) x 3�.9 � x 29.7 X 29.7 30.0 29.6 x29.0 x x 28.3 � x 28.6 . i� �i, � � , � 30.9 28.9 x x BLOCK WALL 1 P ORER71(S UNE � x,y TOP OF BANK X ry• 'y � �' x ( )" 30.9�.x31.0 \\ 28.8 29.2 x 27.9 � �' '; � ' 9 'y x � 37.1 30.1 " FULL OF DIRT 30.2 x30.8...__,.x. / , ; �� t � � �� p� . ' � A S P H A T P AV E MI E N T � I W000 POWER POLE ,, i y !;� � ' O l SHOWN PER CITY OF CtEARWATER � ! �i � � "�1� �� h � +� STORM ATLAS (IYPICAL) 0� 2 ` (TOP CUT OFF) � �� '�' � '• � x LIMI7S OF x�g Oy S A N I T A R Y M A N H O L E I � ,b�?' 7 j; �� ASPHALT PAVEMfNT " RIM ELEV.=29.48 a 1 1. INVER7 N=25.31 I =29.7 � /�xry- �� '' i1j ( "3 � � 'h�� °j' INVERT W=25.27 � 29.9 * 29.6 � q ;i � � f U �� I�( \� 0 22" � =32.2 x3i.3 " 29.95� `L�'�'� •29.3 " x30.1 " K28.6 x29.2 X27.1 =27.9 � � I I� � � r Q x� 29.93 29.7 I x 29.4 x 29.5 x 29.4 I � �i i `L x 30.8 29.8 INVERT E=25.28 x 29.4 I x 29.1 : 28.4 x 27.8 . O 81 x 28.3 x 28.5 1 �, j � � � w O �"� � TOP OF GRATE I � � h ;;� ; w w � � � ,��4" �29.3 x29.4 �16" x3�.5 6"V.C.P. S 6'Y.C.P. I ELEV.= 29.05' . 2 tn < �' !L I /� 5' CONCRfTE �. ' i I,I 'i� � I SIDEWALK , 4 d � I'. �� O ry �L `1� �6 0°� ry�,• ti x . STORM ATLAS (TYPICAL) v � i � i 0- ! � i,,, �M-~ � x x�� L �� ^ a �°� �� xry°�� ".; � /`� SHOWN PER CI1Y OF CLEARWATER ' � Xry � i W � � W� �. 1� K^ x Xry� X� x� x 29.3 x 29.4 X 29.4 K 29.5 x 9y �. x 28.8 �y�,ry ,y 'h x 28. t �a x x 28.1 'Y � x�1.1� / � �� I z I� : Z� ,`` O 24� I � ` x29.i `L x�j.3 � x x29.0 x 0• %ry 28.5 x28.7 x� x28.3 / x27.5 � � t �� { i� � �i� F- z � � 37.3 � / " ,y�� ti / =2�.� � n �.. J �� a ;� � SCALE. 1 =50 -� 'Lry�x 3-i .6 i i `�,�' z " %27.3 � � � n � x x • 30.8 x e � h " w,,, i, ti xzs.s X � ,� �2s.s po. �a" po zo" � / ss.o cv za,i �, 3 T �6,.6.. ,�. 29.3 28.7ry�' 0 18" QO 13° . � � %'h TOP OF GRATE � x 29.� % ` ' � 'i �I � o � i i'� � �� 0' t' 28' 5D' 100' W ^ � ELEV.= 29.51' f � , t- O �2 I 0!0 ( X � ❑27 Ei..EV.= .27.45' / / �� :N � . I � +y � �i r i• Z �+- 33.8 �>>^ TOP OF GRATE = x`ti ! � y �� v i � ti �C28.2 N �i � �� '� ^ I " �.. / , x28.4 x27.6 x27.9 x � ;, . � '•t i�� r� � � ,...-_._--�•za.i-.._�._---x2a.a----.._-zs.s-�---x•2s.s------x2s.s-.-._._..---•-------�x�2s.z-----------•--.._._X. .. .. .. X. z�.� x2�.s i+M :: ,!� Q ��I i .._. _..._. � z8.2---_.._.__._. __ ..... _-� 2E.o�_._...__. x2�.�..._....._..__._... . K.2�.s�---....--------..__X. X. x2�.� ., , 27.5�-----.____..__...--•-- 27.6-�-..__....._..._.._ x26.9 Ci '� j ij 0 � 6 �.__. _.. 27.t � i � �` x, y0• tl� , Lg� 0`.Y _ % 27.6 x 26.8 x 2 7. 5 e- j h �• 4" '� ^ x� < f.t � "`�0 ' y " � xti ROADWAY BASE � x� -�x27.0 O � � �i! �i ��_` ' N 4•� i��,' x3D.6 I � � � MATERIAL 1. ,�1_, . � 9 27.6 x27.8 �' u I �i v-- i ro X29.6 ..__..�. 3._...-___.�.___ w x`l' .� ro• x29• �i� �I o• ■29.4 28. -x•28.4.�.._.�._____--K�28J--.w--_•28.5-�-- x•28.2_.__...__,._....__......._x. X � `Y tn i � i 27.9 �'--..._....___�...___ 28.0--�_.._._..�--•--°...28.1/ _...__..._- -•--.--._-x- x a �i• r , 4,� � x'S � 28.6x �28.1 �`Y . - - 27.6-_„.27.7-..__._.._--_--------°------�.......�_._.__....x.27.5•--- _.........._ � x27.8 ; � t� 9 �� I ' '` 28.2 X 28.9 x 28.8 x 29.3 �' x 28.7 ; ti l J� � DRAINAGE MANNOLE xry ; j I �li 2 1 32.4 �: QOQ 27' I 0• x27.7 '� / �10" '.'x27.1 �_\ �j- �' SHOWN PER CITY Of CLEARWATER x�O X27.7'��.�. �x27.4 �26.9 RIM ELEV.=28.58� t i i � ; i i k ISLAND � IN THE SUN CO-OP INC. � � + STORM ATIAS (lYPfCAL) i "�' � `. / � ; ;�, ' ,,, � � � � ! + 0 2 3" � O� 2"� 2" x 2 7. 7 `\�� •�`� X 2 j� ;2� SHOWN PER CIN OF CIEARWATER � V � � i� FOLIO #43450--��-��0� M �o� ! ' �9� o ,,�. �'� DRIM E EV=275U� i x26.2 STORM aTULS (TYe�CAL)� / 7ELEPHONE � !�� ;j O• x . i �y x`� ry°j� x29.o x28.8 . . / � �:: i �;i iti (O.R. �OOK ��i�55, �PAGE 746) o � , . � x 27.53 , / X2,., PEDESTAL • . 4..4.,5.�5.� x 3C�.3 � xti°'� :-n 28.8 �. i � � x 27.7 � 33� ��W �!� � p . � ,`•X26.7 � i o 26J 26.5 � �,'1• X27�9" I :ry i�i Z o• � -I---- "29•� ', �,' � ' DRAINAGE MANHOLE x R � i R/W WiD7H NOT DETERMINED 31.6 x� x 29A ( u�`'i + 29.0 _. x 28.8 � x 28.8 �26.� zr2 �7 � RIM EIEV.=27.52 � x28.2 ry0' i �� ! x30,� � TOP OP GRATE XZg,g 28•4" I m-' i`27•5x28'a =29.1 x 28•4x-"P �F 9P�K � � DRAINAGE MnNHOLE \` c,26.512fi"'" % APPROXIMA7E LIMITS Of ARFA BEING USED .aS x ! � �� i�i ' EIEV.= 28.86' 27.6. a x 2g, 7 X 29.0 SO x 28.4 �6.5 CONSTRUCAON 5TAGING/TEMPORARY MAiERIAI.S x 2. � ;y iy � � � i �-� � RiM'ELEV.=27.27 � R.�� 1 � STORAGE, MATERIALS HAVE NOT BEEN �OCATE�. � ��! " ��i \ U 19"i 7" � � 3 4 � 0�O � � x 26.84,L., ACTNIN OBSERVED OURING SURVEY 1NDICATES THE � jj �j� � I �� 'L �L°'� ' � z7•62 USE OF THIS SITE IN SUPPORT OF CONSTR�CT�ON � �� \ �-LIGHT POLE � Q�g" � ¢ � SANITARY MANHOLE x ; 29.0 x rc DRAINAGE MANHOLE � 26.5X DRAINAGE MANHOIE ; �'i f t 1 � � S RIM ELEV.=29.50 � RIM ELEV.=27.44 -� �' ACTNIAES ON PROPER7Y EAST OF BAYVIEW AVENUE. ; ;`� � � _�� RtM EIEV.=27.71 i� ''� � I � i 6'V.C.P. INVERT N=23.23 �28A � LOW ARFA x29.5 27.56� � � � �X x28.8 �' � ;1 ,y � �, 5„3..3., 4j � x 2 7.8 �� 26.83 27.5 x oi 28.1 x 26.6 � �� i? 1 '1' I INVERT W=23.26 HEAVII�Y VEGETATED 27.53 � 26. � � �1 ii � � 4"3" � �� I � x� j INVER7 S=23.18 � ANO HOLDING WATER (CONFUC7) DRAINAGE MANHOLE � � q,1' � � ;�! 1,� � , ��s� ' 30.9 x`Y UNABLE 70 COLIECT TOPOGRAPHIC RIM ELEV.=27J6 j j 26.66 �� X � xZg_g � �� ii � ( • 4"4" �'� � � INFORMATION 'RT 'TIME 'OF'FlELO Zg;g x TOP OF 10" D:t.P.= 25.6t � ;�26,78 \ �. \ / X • � ; �q a�l . I tx� x29.5 " 27.8 x27.3 x27.1 X27.9 x28.8 .� 28.8 SURVEY (04 05 2011 (10" �.I.P. L1NE PASSES THROUGH RIM V.-27.45 �27.44 � �,• i, �' 28 7 M / // , DRAINA�'iE'�li1ANNOLE �!� � ORAINAGE MANNOLE 0 y I 1;' �� d- r i � 4" �x� 2.�.6 I �� ,y x28A ,�0� 72" " � 28.2 "ry� `L9' � . x 29.2x � . 26J9 � � \ (ASSUMED LOCATiON PER CITY OF `L � � �i p., \� "29•1 MANHOIE, PRESUMED T BE SANITARY. �� 81 i� � S.�S..n , 4.�3,. q `b O x x �o QOQ 12" �� C EAR i �:t , i ��0 5" :s� n • 6"3" __-� . 4..4.. , , 5�. !,`! � s^4.� � OQ27,• zn c � x ti� x 1 x�0� 1 x�� I � I � ti9� � ::1.0 x29.2 i x28.6 x27.6 x 28.1 O TOP OF GRATE x`U� � Ei.EV.= 27.56' �20�� ) ------------' � DRAINAGE MANHOIb� + x,yo,• � RIM EIEV.=27.33 1 70P OF GRATE � j � ELEV.= 28.22' x26.88 1 '4i.0 x 28.6 � x 2$.4 x 28.0 27.3 x�� -- �. �;x 26.72 �30.4 � � F'c)wER POLE I{26.& WiTH ELECTRIC I � � Q qg" � F'(:DESTAL I f' �I � �� . w��• �+� .�.�� '�'r �. .__�__.r LEGEND LB = UCENSED BUSINESS 1� = CONCRETE Ui'ILIN POLE (P) = PIAT MFI+SUREMENT � _ � IGHT POLE (D) = DEED MEASUREMEtVT � = GUY ANCHOR (F) = FIELD MEASUREMENT iC� = L�TILITY POLE (C) = CALCULATED � _ �RAFFIC CONTROL BOX E.P. = EDGE OF PAVEMENT � = ELECTRIC PANEL CONC = CONCRE7E � = WATER VALVE G�L = CENTER UNE �- = FIRE HYDRANT SAN. = SANITARY � = GRAINAGE MANHOLE ' MH. = MANHOLE m = SANITARY MANHOIE INV. = iNVERT Q = C:AS METER P.V.C. = POLYVlNYL CHLORiDE PIPE D4 GV = GAS VALVE R.C.P. = REINFORCED CONCRET£ PIPE OO = TEL•EPHONE MANHOLE C.M.P. = CORRUGATEO METAL PIPE OT = iELEPHONE UTILITY BOX V.C.P. = VITR(FIED CIAY PIPE � = SIGN FDOT = FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF � = BE:IdCN MARK TRRNSPORTA710N S.R. = STl�1'E ROAD M E S = M i T E R E O E N D S E C T I O N R/W = RiCHT-OF-WAY �= U 7YPE CONCRETE WAIL (R) = f2ADIAL LINE D = ;i.ANITARY ClEANOUT P.S.M. = PROFESSIOi�AL SURVEYOR AND MAPPER Q = 1YELL � = WATER ME7ER ST = INOICATES DRAI�v'F�GE CULVERT SPOT ELEVATIONS xs.t = GROUND SPOT ELEVATION TREI_ LEGEND: (fROM 06/11 /2007 SURVEY) Q- UNKIVOWN TREE x6.t3 = PAVEMENT SPbT ELEVATtON �O= UAK TREE (FROM 06/i 1/2007 SURVEY) �� F'A1.M TREE 25.60 = PAVEMENT SPOT ELEVATION �= F'INE TREE 25.t0 = TOP OF CURB ELEVATION x 25.12 = EDGE �F PAVEMENT ELEVATION OO = ORNAMENTAL TREE (FROM 06/19/2007 SURVEY) �= MAPLE iREE QS = :iYCAMORE TREE 25.60 = TOP OF CURB ELEVATION e= (;EpAR TREE x 25.12 = EDGE OF PAVEMENT ELEVATION �= f2.OSEW00D TREE (FROM 06/11�2007 SURVEY) X '� = GROUND SPOT ELEVATIOtV (OBSERVED DURING 04/05/2011 SURVEY) ' 0' � =28J � a' GRATE iNLET L WA7ER STORM ATIAS) � � x`1' x2�� X�l-0 x29.2 `i' ryo�� /� x2�A i ! % 0 (,ASSUMEO LOCATION PER C{lY OF � }�28.2 I x29 6 ti°�. /� pRavAGE KANHOLE CLFARWATER STORM ATLAS) � i 28 7'�� x2a•7 � RiM ELEV.=27.82 , \ / � 28.7 ' \ �� ',` f �0 � 28�8 � � •,U.. TYPE CO� CRE7E ,y�' � � � 0 27'• ry'1 � ' "ry '.._�'- i ENDWALL (iYPICAL) �^ '�'� x29.0 / ry.� �` x � ��'i 29.2 x29. � � 10„ z 29.0 �i � � 30"R.C.P. / x � , x � 024"(OFJ+D) � \ 28.5 0, � � ' �. INVERT ELEV.=22.47' / / ; o�• . i %27.0 x2�.5 x27.9 x28.��12,� x29.7 f i � t\ x29.6 %28.6 x28.4 �%2%5/ x27.2 x`1'� iDh `� °� � � � � i Z 30"R.C.P. + `. ` `�K29.3 X29.4 TOP OF BANK 29.0 / x�' R.1 �27.5 ' � I � . x 29.1-.. . . ______. . . _....._._. x 28.9__ � �28.3 N INVERT ELEV.=23.01' ' \\ E � : i -�. k21.5 , x29.a . - . °�� ' � - - - - - - - - - ' . i � ',� \` Y �.X.29.5 � x 29.3 , x O •28.3-x 28.7 xry b,�" � � ; � '- - - - - - - - - ,� 22.4, � �� `\F S '� �"_, --. 28.2 2 28.T 28 3 \ ! x`�' i Q _ » » _ �9�- -'--' � � ry�1 ti0. / 1 26.7 � DRAINAGE MANHOLE ? ' i ` f /� 22.5 OF 'xi 9.7 `COp � - X �. ' x%�� x 28. x � � 6 x27.6 "28.6_ . , i i.23.0 T\. F .'-22.4v�:> 28.d x 27.0 p x 28.7�.. RIM EL�EV.=27.43 00 � ' � . r / O �� x-22.9---x• .� ••---'-- -• 22.8 � 30"C.M.P. �,`, �,0. . !20.5X l� • \ 'C . 23.0--_ ._._.__._...-.-x.22.5"`. INVERT ELEY.=22.84' , x �' " .J'� x � I , �22.5 22.5 S� �x20.3 . . - ---- -%22.8 � . �' � . ti �� x29.i : � +"22.9 23.Y'+a� AF �,w21.4--. ..._- ---x�20.9....__._..r_ ._._. x27.5-"-....__._., t� ±x229 i zry1 i ..__ .. `� 27.5 x 28.6 x 28 5 �t ' ! � .x- x•22.5_. __, �� - X 23 0~ '�-.-__ � x i � � x 28.1 , � ; I � � ` , �_.. 22.5-__..,_. _.._ _._.x . - ...-x 23. t. � 28.5 x 29.1 , 26.80 l x 22.3 i � ��22.7- ."._. __... . 23.0 ` .. 1 � : x 29.4 : x 29.4 • 21. 7� � 20.322.%23.6x 24. t �"23. T_-• --23.1 x TOP OF BANK ' x 23.2 . � x 28.6 � i `'� i � x 28.7 x 27.3 i 27.2 . . � f. �i . x 22.9 i xry1� i ; ! ; ' x 24.1 x24.2 x 23.7 �� ,�,,,, �.�,� t",�.,..;�,.,..,.� �� r ��.��. �r� ..nr..�.. �...�� r �r+�.�r.. ��iu......:.r�. �....�.... �.� rnr�.� w�.�� o..�� ...� �� MATCH LINE SEE SHEET 2 OF 2 r-----------------------� ._�_._.._ r_.._ / CONCREiE SIDEWALK `:1`� �_ 1 � CONCRETE SIDEWALK � \ l.________..__ ` '� ----1 � ^ \� � �� ! 1 , � � � � � i I � >>.s' '; `�� 1 + FOUND 1/2" �' `�� 9.9' 1 J IRON ROD � � �� ( °G.F.Y. L8.021�� f � �� i �6' CHA'N LINK FENCE { ; ' �,�„ 5.6' - 5.1' J! i 6' WO00 FENCE -' �� a� � w F O U N D 1/ 2" 6' CHAIN �UNK FENCE 3 5, � � � � J �•3� IRON ROD ' ° t ( � � J 7,1' (OISTURBED) 13.5' u� � ( �z 3 1.0' � I � � ; � � .� �Y. � � v; I � O BOUNDARY LINE I z • . S �l � � j � ( � 0.4' FOUNO 1/2" � � IROM ROD �..._ _ _. ._ - _ _ - - _ ' �_ _. , .r r. G.F.Y. L.8.021 " � DETAIL "F" � r � DEI'AIL "8" ,�OT 70 SCALE N07 TO SCALE DESCRIPTION: ' , THE NORTHEAST i/4 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 17, TOWNSHIP 29 SOUfiH, RANGE 16 EAST, PINELIAS COUN7Y, FLQRIQA; LESS AND EKCEPT THE NORTH 50 FEE? THEREOF FOR RIGNT-OF-WAY FQR URE1N STREET; ALSO LESS AND EXCEPT TME EAST 33 �EEi' THEREOF FOR TIGMT-OF-WAY FOR BAYVIEW BOULEVARD. � LINE TABL.E LINE LENGTH BEARING L1 50.00 S01`Q3'22'�W L2 33.00 N89' 15' 40"W . - � �.:.■'� 1 UPDATED BOUNDARY SURVEY AND TREE LOCATION DATA, SAMPLED/SUPPLEMENTED GROUND SPOT ELEVATIONS AND UPDAT.ED/VERIFIED ACCESSIBLE SANITARY AND STORM STRUCTURES 04/05/11 DMD/89522 �7 �S-�� CREW CHIEF: ,�L QREV NO. RtbISION DESCRIPTION REV. OA7E DRAWN BY / EMP. N0. SEC-7WP-RGE ORAWN BY: DMD, �ti4.� t ;y a r • -x 29.0 x 29.0 x�l.°' x 29.2 �� "� �x "29-5 j-d,„- 1 ry9. . �10.. x ' �-•�ii g � e� ti9� ; ;;i ; ►� !!t i � i': � � � ,�, _._� o' t ! ' � ' ' Z W O z � T (W11 t-- O O W � z� J w �Z WW _ w~ �� O SURVEY NOTES: ST�ATEMENTS ARE MADE WITH REGARD TO UNDERGROUND UTIL.ITIES: CONJUNCTION WITH THE 04/�5/2011 UPDATE EFFORT ARE SNOWN AT A 45 ANGLE TO DIFFERENTIATE THEM FRQM PREVIOUSLY 085ERVED DATA. 1. A COPY OF THAT CERTAIN TITLE COMMITMENT PREPARED BY FIDEUTY (i) STORM ORAINAGE CULVERiS HAVE BEEN GRAPHICALLY APPROXIMAi'ED NATIONAL 71TLE tNSURANCE COMPANY (ORDER NUMBER 3420039) HAVING MEREON BASED UPON TNE LOCATION OF ABOVE GROUND EVIQENCE 10. FFATURES WITNIN ADJACENT RIGHTS-OF-WAY (SHOWN HEREON BY AN EFFECTIVE DAT� OF FEBRUARY i8. 2Q11 AT 8:00 AM HAS BEEN iOiGETHER WITH STORMWATER ATLAS INF�RMATION PR�VIDED BY THE CIIY DASHED SCREENED I.INEIYPE/LINEWEiGHT) HAVE BEEN GRAPHiCALLY PROyIDEp TO TliE UNDPRSiGNED AND THE FOl.LOWlNG JTEMS FROM OF CLFARWATER. DE�P1Ci'�D BqS�fl iJPON TliAi' CE�TAIN SI�RV�If �'REPAR�D��flY 'fiiE SCHEDULE B- SECTION 2 THEREOF HAVE BEEN SHOWN OR NOTEQ UPON UNDER5IGNED ENTlTLEQ "fOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY -(OFF-SI7E ROADWAYS)" THtS MAP OF SURVEY AS FOLLOWS: (ii� THE CIN OF CLEARWATER STORMWATER A7LAS U5ED DEPICTS CERTAIN (PROJECT Na. 04370-000-001) HAYING A LAST REVISION DATE OF STIRUCTURES THAT HAVE NOT BEEN RECOVERED AND LOCATED AS A PART Q3/08/2005. THE DEPIC'fION OF FEAtURES HAS NOT BEEN UPDATED TO ITEM No.S: i'HAT CERTAIN EASEMENT DEED RECQRDED IN OFFICIAL RECORD OF THIS SURVEY. AS OF THE LAST DATE OF FIELD SURVEY SkIOWN HEREON REFLECT CHANGES WHICH MAY HAVE OCCURRED SlNCE THAT SURYEY DATE BOOK 3850, PAGE 737 DESCRIBES THE CONVEYANCE OF AN EASEMENT TH�E SITE REMAWS VEGETATED WITH GRASSES, WEEDS AND BRUSH TO THE AS SUCH EFFORTS ARE INCLUDED IN A PORTION OF THE CONTRACTUAL OVER U'fILITIES OWNED BY FLQRIDA POWER CORPORATION AS DESIGNED EXTENT THAT STRUCTURE LOCATIONS ARE OBSCURED. IN AE?DIiION, 7HE SCOPE OF SERVICES THAT HAS NOT Yt�' BEEN AUTHORIZED SY THE AND INSTALIED. THE fOLLOWiNG STATEMENTS ARE MADE REGARDING THiS AGCESS OPENIN�S OF CERTAIN STRUCTURES NAVE BEEN iN7ENTI0NALLY CLIENT. EASEMENT: CO�VEREO BY TWE PIACEMENT OF FILTRATION SCREEN MATERIAL OVER WHICH DiRT HAS BUILT UP AILOWiNG 7HE GROWTH OF VEGETATION OVER 11. THE LOCATIONS OF THOSE TREES WH1CH LIE WITHIN THE BOUNDARIES (i) THIS TOTAL AREA ENCOMPASSEO BY THIS EA5EMENT DOCUMENT COVERS SUICM STRUCfURES TO ?HE EXTENT THAT TMEIR LOCATtONS ARE FURTHER OF THE SUBJEC7 PARCEL AND ARE GONSiD�RED TO 8E PROjECTED 1REES 7HE Fllil �X7'EN7' OF TNE SUBJECT PARCFL. H�W�1/ER, A�TUAL GRANTED 4�SCURED AND WHICH MATERIAL PRF1/ENTS .ACCESS TO THE STRUCTURE UND£R ARTiCLE U OF 'CHAPfiER 168 OF 'i4i£ PIWELtAS COUNIY LAND EASEMENTS ARE LIMITED TO AREAS LYING 5 FEET ON EACH SIDE OF IN1fERI0R WITHOUT EXCAVATION EFFORTS THAT ARE BEYOND THE SCOPE OP DEVELOPMEN7 CODE HAVE BEEN SHOWN HEREON SUBJECT TO THE FACILITIES OWNED BY FLORIDA POWER CORPORATI4N AS DESIGN�D AND SE�RVICES OF THE CONTRACT UNDER WHiCH THIS SURVEY WAS PER�'ORMED. FOLLOWING• INSTALLED. ' (iii;) THIS SURVEY MAP IS NOT INTENDED AS A COMPLETE INVENTORY OF THERE ARE NUMEROUS TAMARIND TREES LOCATED ON TNE S1TE THAT NAVE (ii) THE UNDERSIGNED CAN NOT ATTEST TO THE OWNEftSHIP OF ilTiLiTlES STIORMWATER OR SANITARY SEWER FACILITIES. ADDITIONAL INVESTIGATI�N NOT BEEN LOCATED DUE 70 THE PR08ABILIN THAT iHE1R STATUS UNDER SMOWN HEREON, THEREFORE THE EXACT LiMtTS OF EASEMENT(S) GRANTED BE1fOND THE SCOPE OF SERVICES �F TME CONTRACT UNDER WHICH THIS ARTICLE il OF CHAPTER 166 OF THE PINEUAS COUNIY LAND DEVELOPMENT CANNOT 8E PREClSELY MAPPED AT THIS TIME. SUIRVtY WAS PERFORMED WOULD BE REQUIRED TO D�ELOP SUCti AN CODE MAY BE AFFECTED BY THEIR POTENTlAL CLASSIFICA110N AS AN INWENTORY. INVASIVE SPECIES. (iii) THE UNDERSIGNED MAS NOT PERFORMED SUBSURFACE INVESTIGATIONS 4. THIS SURVEY MAKES NO CLAIMS REGARDING OWNERSHIP OR RIGHTS OF AND THE LOCATION OR EXISTENCE OF SUBSURFACE INSTALi.ATiONS OWNED 8Y FLORIDA P�WER CORF'ORATION WITHIN TNE SlJBJECT PAF2CEl. AR� NOT PO�SSESSION. 12. LAS9' UAY OF �'tELD SilRV�Y: fl6J11/2007 (ORIGINAL ISSUE) CURRENTLY KNOWN TO T{1E UNDERSIGNED. 5. THIS SURVEY MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED IN SIZE BY REPRODUCTION. 04/05/2011 (REVISION No. 1) NO OTHER INSTRUMENTS 4F RECORD REF1.ECiING EASEMENTS, THf15 MU5T BE CONSIDERED WNEN OBTi41NING SCALED INFORMATION. RIGHTS-OF-WAY, AND/4R OWNERSHIP WERE FURNISHED TO OR PURSUED 13. 7HE SUBJECT PARCEL CONTAINS 39.792 ACRES (i,733,353 SQUARE BY THE UNDERSIGNED OTHER TNAN TNOSE NOTED HEREON OR TNOSE 6. THIS SURVEY WAS PERFORMED FOR THE SOLE AND EXCLUSIVE BENEFIT FEET), MORE OR LESS PER FIELD 5URVEY. INCLUDED IN SAiD COMMiTMENT. EASEMENTS OR RESTRICTIONS OF RECORD OF THE PARTIES LlSTEO HEREIN AND SHALL NOT BE RELIED UPON BY ANY O7HER 7MAN THOSE SHOWN HEREON MAY EKIST. WILSONMILLER, INC. ANQ OT'HER ENTIN OR INDIVIDUAL WHOMSOEVER. LIKEWISE, ANY RE-USE OF CERTiF1ED i'0: CERTIFYING LAND SURVEYOR ACCEP7 NO RESPONSIBILI7Y FOR THIIS SURVEY FOR ANY PURPOSE OTHER THAN WHICH WAS ORIGINALLY RIGHTS-�F-WAY, EASEMENTS, RESTRICTIONS OF RECORD OR OTHER 1NYENDED, WITHOUT THE WRITTEN PERMISSION OF 7HE UNDERSIGNED BAY CARE HEALTN SYSTEM, INC.; MAiTERS AFFECTING TITLE TO LANDS SllRVEYED OTHER THAN THOSE SIDRV�YOR AND MAPPER� WILL BE OONE SO AT THE RISK OF THE REUSING FIDEUlY NATiONAL TITLE INSt1RANCE COMPANY RECiTED IN 7HE A801/E REFFRENCED T17LE COMMITMENT OR . DTHER PPuRiY HidQ WITHOUT ANY UABILITY TQ TME UNDERSIGNED SURVEYOR - AND SQUIRE, SANDERS & DEMPSEY. L.L.P. INSTRUMENT5 OF RECORD FURNISHED BY CLIENT. MAiPPER. � "t�AC�ARL'ANE. FERGUSON dc M�MUL"C£N; 2. 7HIS SURVEY MAP AND TME COPlES THEREOF ARE NOl' VALID WITHOUT 7. SYMBOLS SNOWN UPON THIS SURVEY MAY NOT BE DRAWN TO SCALE. WlLSONMILLER. C THE SIGNATURE AND THE ORIGINAL RAiSED SEAL OF THE FLORIDA LICENSED CERTIF7. F�� TN �!O No.LB043 8. BEARINGS SHOWN HEREON Ai2E BASED ON THE MQNUMENTEQ SOUTH SURVEYOR AND MAPPER INDICATED BELOW. t'��-�:-' /� �- RI�HT-OF-WAY UNE OF DREW STREEf BEING ASSUMED AS S89'15'40"E. �/� %.. ' 3. NO EXCAVATION WAS PERFORMED TO VERIFY THE LOCATION OR � !�= � EXISTENCE OF ANY UNDERGROUND IMPROVEMENTS, STRUC7URES. OR 9. ELEVATION5 SHOWN HEREON ARE BASED ON NATIONAL GEODEfIC ,�� FOUNDATIONS. UNDERGROUND U71LITiES, IF SHOWN HEREON, ARE SNOWN SUIRVEY CONTROL STATION °COURTNEY B" HAVING A PUBLISHED ELEVATION � 0 DA� �I :{Jo.LS5535 PER ABOVE GROUNO EVIDENCE AND TNE LOCATION OF ALL UNDERGROUND OF 3.66 FEET. (REFERENCED TO 7HE NORTH AMERlCAN VERTICAL DATUM C% UTiL17Y UNES ARE APPROXIMATE ONLY. THIS bOCUMENT SHOUID NOT BE OF 1988). RELIED UPON FOR EXCAVATION OR CRITICAL DESIGN FUNC7tONS WITHOUT FIELD VERIFICATION OF UNDERGROUND UTIUN LOCATIONS. tfTILITIES OTHER TWE MAJORi11f OF GROUND SPOT ELEVATIONS WERE OBSERVED DURING TNE THAN THOSE SHOWN HEREON MAY EXIST. THE FOLLOWING ADDITIONAL 06►/1 i/2007 SURVEY. 6ROUND SP07 ELEI/ATIONS OBSERVED IN - , . � CUENT: ' pATE: TITLE: , � I � BAY CARE HEALTH SYSTEM, INC. os �, Zoo BAY CARE HEALTH SYSTEM, INC. �� HORIZON7AL SCALE: » ' CORPORATE HEADQUATERS New Directions In Planning, Design & Engineering. Since 1956. VERi CAL 50E: 2205NORTH2OTHSTREEf-TAMPA-FLORIDA•33605 N�A BOUNDARY AND TOPO�RAPHI� SURVEY 80U.643.4336.813.223.9500 . F813.223.00Q9 ' 'PRQJECT 'D'A7ABASE(s} Copytight ' WilsonMiller,�nc. . CerGflcateofAulhoriz3tion�143 • FLLic.#LGCUOOi70 . wwv�.wilsonMiuer.wm V:\2156\active\21561038i�survey\survey_dbase�,,c3d_21561038i_bay_COre_corp_hq ��nMillar Inc. 2D09 � _ I ASK: CROSS REfERENCE: 200 oa37o-o00-000 NDEX NUMB t�.�^- SV-215610381-SU01.DWG tHEEf NUMBER: 1 oF 2 , Q • � � � � � 2995 DREW ST COMMON Date Received: 6/1/2011 11:54:55 AM Baycare Healthcare ZONING DISTRICT: Medium Density Residential LAND USE: Residential Urban (7.5 du/acre) ATLAS PAGE : 291 B PLANNER OF RECORD: CL PLANNER: Cate Lee, Planner III CDB Meeting: Case Number: Owner/Applicant Representative: Address: Agenda Item: August 16, 2011 DVA2011-06001 (Related to LUP2011-01002 and REZ2011-01002) Clearwater Housin� Authority/Bavcare Health Svstem, Inc. ED Armstron� III, Esquire, and Johnson, Pope, Bokor, Ruppel & Burns 2995 Drew Street E.3 (Related to E.1 and E.2� CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT GENERAL INFORMATION Request: Review of a Development Agreement between Baycare Health System, Inc. (the property developer) and the City of Clearwater as per Community Development Code Section 4-606. Current/Proposed Zoning Current: Medium Density Residential (MDR) and Commercial Districts: (C) Districts Proposed: Office (0) District Current/Proposed Future Land Use Map Categories: Current: Property Use: Existing Surrounding Zoning And Uses: Proposed: Residential Medium (RM) and Residential/Office/Retail (R/O/R) RPCir�PntiaU(lffinP T.imita�l (R/(lT.l ---------------• � ----- --------- �- � � _., Current: Vacant Proposed: Offices (Corporate Headquarters) North: Open Space/Recreation (OS/R) and Preservation (P) Parks and Recreation Facilities South: Mobile Home Park (MHP) and Tourist (T) Mobile Homes and RV Park East: Institutional (I) Place of Worship West: Mobile Home Park (MHP) Mobile Homes ANALYSIS: Site Location and Existing Conditions: This case involves a 39.79-acre property located at the southwest corner of Drew Street and Bayview Avenue and is owned by the Clearwater Housing Authority. The property is comprised of one parcel and is currently vacant, with internal roads remaining from the previous use. From the 1970s to 2004 the subject property contained a public housing project, Jasmine Courts. The subject property has approximately 1,365 feet of frontage along Drew Street and 1,270 feet of frontage along Bayview Avenue. Community Development Board — August 16, 2011 DVA2011-06001 — Page 1 of 4 Development Proposals: A request for an amendment to the Future Land Use Map of the property from Residential Medium (RM) and Residential/Office/Retail (R/O/R) to Residential/Office Limited (R/OL) is being processed concurrently with this case. In addition, a request for rezoning of the property from Medium Density Residential (MDR) and Commercial (C) to Office (0) is also being processed concurrently with this case. The Development Review Committee reviewed a Flexible Standard Development application (FLS2011-06011) for Baycare Health System, Inc. at its July 7, 2011 meeting. Issuance of the development order is pending approval of the associated cases and required revisions to the site plan. Development Agreement Request: The proposed Residential/Office Limited (R/OL) future land use plan category permits a maximum floor area ratio (FAR) of 0.40. The proposed Development Agreement limits the use and development of the subject site to a total of 300,000 square feet (FAR of 0.20) of office space for a period of 20 years, whereas 693,300 square feet of development could be allowed. The Agreement sets forth public and private obligations and requires redevelopment of the site to be consistent with the following requirements: Is not effective until final approval and effectiveness of the Future Land Use Map and Zoning Atlas amendments under LUP2011-41002 and REZ2011-01002; 2. Sets out the Developer's transportation obligations, including: ❑ Construction of main access to Drew Street (Drive A) on the Property to contain two exiting lanes to separate left and right turning vehicles; n C'nn�tn��tinn pf an ��:�tho��nc3 ri ht tt�rn lane on l�r�w Str�et ?t l�rive A; ❑ Lengthening of the existing westbound left turn lane on Drew Street at Drive A to include 100 feet of full width storage plus deceleration distance; ❑ Construction of secondary access to Bayview Avenue (Drive B) to the Property with the driveway to include two exiting lanes to separate left and right turning vehicles; ❑ Construction of a northbound left turn lane on Bayview Avenue at Drive B to include 175 feet of full width storage plus deceleration distance; ❑ Construction of northbound left turn lanes at the intersection of Drew Street and Bayview Avenue; ❑ Installation of concrete bus pads and bus shelters along Drew Street and Bayview Avenue to accommodate PSTA routes and provide pedestrian access; and ❑ Construction of a pedestrian crosswalk across Drew Street to connect to the E.C. Moare Complex and a recreational trail to facilitate pedestrian access. 3. Requires the property to be developed in conformance with the concept plan submitted as E�ibit B and pursuant to FLS2011-06011; 4. Allows up to 1,600 parking spaces on the Property, provided such spaces can be accommodated while maintaining the required setbacks and internal landscaping requirements, to be shown on the final site plan approved pursuant to FLS2011-06011; Community Development Board — Aub st 16, 2011 DVA2011-06001 — Page 2 of 4 0 5. Limits the building height to a maYimum of 50 feet. Additionally, the Development Agreement obligates the City to comply with the following: 1. Concurrently process the Future Land Use Map amendment under LUP2011-01002 and Zoning Atlas amendment under REZ2011-01002; 2. Approve site and construction plan consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan and the submitted concept plan. CONSISTENCY WITH THE CITY'S COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: [Section 4-606.F] Recommended Findings of Fact: In reaching a decision on whether to approve a development agreement, the Community Development Code requires City Council to determine whether the development agreement is consistent with and furthers the goals, policies and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan. Applicable goals, objectives and policies of the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan which are supportive of the proposed development agreement include: Goal A.4 The City shall not permit development to occur unless an adequate level of service is available to accommodate the impacts of development. Areas in which the impact of existing development exceeds the desired levels of service will be upgraded consistent with the target dates for infrastructure improvements included in the applicable functional plan element. Policy A.6.1.6 Land use decisions in Clearwater shall support the expansion of economic opportunity, the creation of jobs and training opportunities as well as the maintenance of existing industries through establishment of enterprise zones, activity centers and redevelopment areas and by coordination with the Chamber of Commerce, Tourist Development Council and other economic development organizations and agencies. Policy A.6.2.1 On a continuing basis, the Community Development Code and the site plan approval process shall be utilized in promoting infill development and/or planned developments that are compatible. Recommended Conclusions of Law: The development agreement is consistent with the goals, objectives and policies of the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan as indicated in the following. The proposed corporate offices are compatible with the mix of uses in the area and expand economic opportunity in the City. In addition, the proposal does not degrade the level of service for public facilities below the adopted standards. SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION: The Development Review Committee (DRC) reviewed the application and supporting materials at its meeting of July 7, 2011, and deemed the development proposal to be legally sufficient to move forward to the CDB, based upon the following: Community Development Board — August 16, 2011 DVA2011-06001 — Page 3 of 4 Findin�s of Fact: l. That the 39.79-acre site is located on the southwest corner of Drew Street and Bayview Avenue; 2. That there is a companion application to amend the Future Land Use Map designations for the subject property from Residential Medium (RM) and ResidentiallOffice/Retail (R/O/R) to the Residential/Office Limited (R/OL ) d esignation ( LUP2011-01002), and to rezone the property from Medium Density Residential (MDR) and Commercial (C) districts to the Office (0) district (REZ2011-01002); 3. That the purpose of this Development Agreement is to restrict the development potential on the property to less than the maximums allowable; 4. That the Development Agreement requires certain transportation improvements. Conclusions of Law: The Planning and Development Department, having made the above findings of fact, reaches the following conclusions of law: 1. That the Development Agreement implements and formalizes the maximum requirements for the construction of on-site and off-site improvements under the related site plan proposal (FLS2011-06011); 2. That the Development Agreement complies with the standards and criteria of Section 4-606 of the Community Development Code; 3. That the Development Agreement is inconsistent with and the Visions, Goals, Objectives and Policies of the Comprehensive Plan. Based upon the above, the Planning and Development Department recommends the APPROVAL, and recommendation to the City Council, of a Development Agreement between Baycare Health System, Inc. (the developer) and the City of Clearwater as per Community Development Code Section 4-606, for the property at 2yy5 llrew Street. Prepared by Planning and Development Department Staff: '\��N Wl� � Catherine Lee, Planner III ATTACHMENTS: 0 Development Agreement with Exhibits ❑ Staff Resume O Location Map ❑ Aerial Map ❑ Future Land Use Map ❑ Zoning Map ❑ Existing Sunounding Uses Map ❑ Site Photographs S: IPlanning DepartmentlC D BlDevelopmenr Agreements (DVA)lDrew Street 2995 - DVA2011-06001 - Baycare Health System, IncLSta„tj ReportlDVA2011-06001 Drew Street 2995 DVA Staff Report for 81611 CDB.docx Community Development Board — August 16, 2011 DVA2011-06001 — Page 4 of 4 - _4 _. �� 1 Planning Department ° �l�arwater 100 South Myrtle Avenue > Clearwater, Florida 33756 Telephone: 727-562-4567 t� Fax: 727-562-4865 D SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION 0 SUBMIT 12 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION inciuding folded site plans 0 SUBMIT APPLICATION FEE $ CASE #: DATE RECEIVED: RECEIVED BY (staff initials): ATLAS PAGE #: ZONING DISTRICT: LAND USE CLASSIFICATION: ZONING & LAND USE CLASSIFICATION OF ADJACENT PROPERTIES: NORTH: SOUTH: WEST: EAST: DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT APPLICATION (Revised OS/22l02) �PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT� A. APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION: (Section 4-202.A) BayCare Health System, Inc. (Attn: James Orr) APPLICANT NAME 8452-118th Avenue North, Largo, Florida 33773 MAILING ADDRESS: PHONE NUMBER: CELL NUMBER: PROPERTY OWNER(S): 727-394-6576 FAX NUMBER: EMAIL ADDRESS: Clearwater Housing Authority (Attn: Jacqueline Rivera, CDO) �nn�5b.��`�OX��9o�"8 �rs)Clearwater, FL 33757-0960 E. D. Arn�strong III, Esquire, an AGENT NAME: J011T1SOI1 � POj�2 , Bokor, Rllpp2l & BLIY'I1S � T,T P 911 Chestnut Street, Clearwater, FL 33756 MAILING ADDRESS: 727-461-1818 727-462-0365 PHONE NUMBER: FAX NUMBER: B. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT IhFo RMATION: 2985 and 2995 Drew Street STREETADDRESS: VaCarit — SOUtI1WeSt corner of Drew Street and Bayview Avenue LEGAL DESCRtPTION: PARCEL NUMBER: PARCE� SIZE: PROPOSED USE AND SIZE: See E�hibit "A" attached. 17-29-16-00000-110-0100 39.7� acres m.o.l. (acres, square feet) See F��hihit "B" attached. (number of dwelling units, hotel rooms or square footage of nonresidential use) DESCRIPTION OF ANY RELATED REQUEST(S): R�jU2St fOr' rezoning to °�" ��I1C1 use plan dI�I1C�IC1�'T1t: to R/OL and Flexible Develo�nt Application for Comprehensive Infill Redev. Proje (approval of a developmentinclude all requested code deviations; e.g. reduction in required number of parking spaces, specific use, etc.) DOES THIS APPLICATION INVOLVE THE TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMEN7 RIGHTS (TDR), A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, OR A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED (CERTIFIED) SITE PLAN? YES _ NO X(if yes, attach a copy of the applicable documents) Page 1 0( 5— Development Agreement Apptication — City of Clearwater See �hibit "B" att�ched for Supplemental info�tion. B.2 DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENTS SUPPLEMENTAL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-606.B) An application for approval of a development agreement shall be accompanied by the following (use separate sheets or inGude in a formal report): ❑ STATEMENT OF THE REQUESTED DURATION OF THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT,WHICH SHALL NOT EXCEED TEN YEARS O DESCRIPTION OF ALL EXISTING AND PROPOSED PUBLIC FACILITIES AND SERVICES THAT SERVE OR WI�L SERVE THE DEVELOPMENT; ❑ DESCRIPTION OF THE USES DESIRED TO BE PERMITTED ON THE LAND, INCLUDING POPULATlON DENSITIES AND BUILDING INTENSITIES AND HEIGHTS; ❑ INDENTIFICATION OF ZONING DISTRICT CHANGES, CODE AMENDMENTS THAT WILL BE REQUIRED IF THE PROPOSED DEVELOPM PROPOSAL WERE TO BE APPROVED; 0 ZONING AND LAND USE CATEGORIES OF ALL ADJOINING PROPERTIES; 0 COMPLETE NAMES AND ADDRESSES OF ALL OWNERS OR PROPERTIES ABUTTING OR LYING WITHIN 200 FEET OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY AS CURRENTLY LISTED IN THE COUNTY RECORDS AS OF ONE WEEK PRIOR TO THE FILING OF AN APPLICATION. C. PROOF OF OWNERSHIP: (Section 4-202.A) ❑ SUBMIT A COPY OF THE TITLE OR DEED TO THE PROPERTY OR PROVIDE OWNER SIGNATURE ON PAGE OF THIS APPLICATION D. WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: {Section 4-606.G) D Provide the following contents to the development agreement, as follows: Contents. The approved development agreement shall contain, at a minimum, the following information: a. A legal description of the land subject to the development agreement. b. The names of ail persons having legal or equitable ownership of the land. c. The duration of the development agreement, which shall not exceed ten years. d. The development uses proposed for the land, including population densities, building intensities and building height. e. A description of the public facilities and services that will serve the development, including who shall provide such public faciiities and services; date any new public facilities and services, if needed, will be constructed; who shall bear the expense of construction of any new public facilities services; and a schedule to assure that the public facilities and services are available concurrent with the impacts of the development. development agreement shall provide for a cashier's check, a payment and performance bond or letter of credit in the amount of 115 percent of ,estimated cost of the public facilities and services, to be deposited with the city to secure construction of any new public facilities and servi required to be constructed by the development agreement. The development agreement shall provide that such construction shall be comple prior to the issuance of any certificate of occupancy. f. A description of any reservation or dedication of land for public purposes. g. A description of all local development approvals approved or needed to be approved for the development. h. A finding that the development approvals as proposed is consistent with the comprehensive plan and the community development co� Additionally, a finding that the requirements for concurrency as set forth in Article 4 Division 10 of these reguiations have been satisfied. i. A description of any conditions, terms, restrictions or other requirements determined to be necessary by the city commission for the public hea safety or welfare of the citizens of the City of Clearwater. Such conditions, terms, restrictions or other requirements may be supp�emental requirements in existing codes or ordinances of the city. j. A statement indicating that the failure of the development agreement to address a particular permit, condition, term or restriction shall not relie the developer of the necessity of complying with the law governing said permitting requirements, conditions, terms or restrictions. k. The development agreement may provide, in the discretion of the City Commission, that the entire development or any phase thereof commenced or be completed within a specific period of time. The development agreement may provide for liquidated damages, the denial of futi development approvals, the termination of the development agreement, or the withholding of certificates of occupancy for the failure of developer to comply with any such deadiine. I. A statement that the burdens of the devetopment agreement shall be binding upon, and the benefits of the development agreement shall inure all successors in interest to the parties to the development agreement. m. All development agreements shall specifically state that subsequentiy adopted ordinances and codes of the city which are of general application not governing the development of land shall be applicable to the lands subject to the development agreement, and ihat such modifications ; specificaliy anticipated in the development agreement. Page 2 of 5— Development Agreement Application — City of Ctearwater E. SUPPLEMENTAL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A) ❑ SIGNED AND SEALED SURVEY (including legal description of property) — One original and 12 copies; ❑ COPY OF RECORDED PLAT, as applicable; O PRELIMINARY PLAT, as required; ❑ LOCATION MAP OF THE PROPERTY. ❑ TREE SURVEY (including existing trees on site and within 25' of the adjacent site, by species, size (DBH 4" or greater), and location, including drip lines.) 0 GRADING PIAN, as applicable; F. SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A) ❑ S�TE PLAN with the following information (not to exceed 24" x 36"): All dimensions; North arrow; _ Engineering bar scale (minimum scale one inch equals 50 feet), and date prepared; _ Location map; _ Index sheet referencing individual sheets included in package; _ Footprint and size of all buildings and structures; _ A�I required setbacks; _ All existing and proposed points of access; _ All required sight triangles; _ Identification of environmentally unique areas, such as watercourses, wetlands, tree masses, and specimen trees, including description and location of understory, ground cover vegetation and wildlife habitats, etc; _ Location of al� public and private easements; _ Location of all street rights-of-way within and adjacent to the site; _ Location of existing public and private utilities, including fire hydrants, storm and sanitary sewer lines, manholes and lift stations, gas and water lines; _ Ail parking spaces, driveways, ioading areas and vehicular use areas; _ Depiction by shading or crosshatching of all required parking lot interior landscaped areas; _ Location of all refuse collection facilities and all required screening (min. 10'x12' clear space); _ Location of all landscape material; _ Location of all onsite and offsite storm-water management facilities; _ Location of all outdoor lighting fixtures; and _ Location of all existing and proposed sidewalks. ❑ SITE DATA TABLE for existing, required, and proposed development, in written/tabular form: _ �and area in square feet and acres; _ Number of dwelling units proposed; _ Gross floor area devoted to each use; _ Parking spaces: totai number, presented in tabutar form with the number of required spaces; _ Totai paved area, including all paved parking spaces and driveways, expressed in square feet and percentage of the paved vehicular area; _ Size and species of all landscape material; _ Official records book and page numbers of all existing utility easement; _ Building and structure heights _ tmpermeable surface ratio (I.S.R.); and _ Fioor area ratio (F.A.R.) for all nonresidential uses. ❑ REDUCED SITE PLAN to scale (8'/� X 11) and color rendering if possible; O FOR DEVELOPMENTS OVER ONE ACRE, provide the following additional information on site plan: _ One-foot contours or spot elevations on site; _ Offsite elevations if required to evaluate the proposed stormwater management for the parcel; _ All open space areas; _ Location of all earth or water retaining walls and earth berms; _ Lot lines and building lines (dimensioned); _ Streets and drives (dimensioned); _ Building and structural setbacks (dimensioned); _ Structural overhangs; _ Tree Inventory; prepared by a"certified arborisf', of all trees 8" DBH or greater, reflecting size, canopy (drip lines) and condition of such trees. Page 3 of 5— Development Agreement Application — City of Cleanvater G. LANDSCAPING PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-1102.A) �❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ LANDSCAPE PLAN: All existing and proposed structures; Names of abutting streets; Drainage and retention areas including swales, side slopes and battom elevations; Delineation and dimensions of all required perimeter landscape buffers; Sight visibility triangles; Delineation and dimensions of all parking areas inctuding landscaping islands and curbing; Proposed and required parking spaces; Existing trees on-site and immediately adjacent to the site, by spec;ies, size and locations, inGuding dripline; Location, size, description, specifications and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materiais, inciuding botanical and common names; Typical planting details for trees, palms, shrubs and ground cover piants including instructions, soil mixes, backfiliing, mulching and protective measures; Interior Iandscaping areas hatched andlor shaded and Iabeled and interior landscape coverage, expressing in both square feet and percentage covered; Conditions of a previous development approval (e.g. conditions imposed by the Communiiy Development Board); Irrigation notes. REDUCED LANDSCAPE PLAN to scaie (8 %z X 11) (color rendering if possible); IRRIGATION PLAN (required for level iwo and three approval); COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM application, as applicable. H. BUILDING ELEVATION PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: {Section 4-202.A.23) Required in the event the application includes a development where design standards are in issue (e.g. Tourist and Downtown Districts) or as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project or a Residential �nfill Project. ❑ BUILDING ELEVATION DRAWINGS — all sides of all buildings including height dimensions, colors and materials; ❑ REDUCED BUILDING ELEVATIONS — four sides of building with colors and materials to scale (8 '/z X 11) (black and white and color rendering, if possible) as required. i. SIGNAGE: (Division 19. SIGNS / Section 3-1806) ❑ Comprehensive Sign Program application, as applicable (separate application and fee required). ❑ Reduced signage proposal (8'/� X 11) (color), if submitting Comprehensive Sign Program application. J. TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY: (Section 4-801.C) 0 Include as required if proposed development will degrade the acceptable level of service for any roadway as adopted in the Comprehensive Plan. Trip generation shall be based on the most recent edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineer's Trip General Manual. Refer to Section 4-801 C of the Community Development Code for exceptions to this requirement. K. SIGNATURE: I, the undersigned, acknowledge that all representations made in this STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS application are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge and Swqrp to and subscribed before lr�e this �""y �day of authorize City representatives to visit and photograph the property P'ldy A.D. 20 to me andlor by described in this application. E. D. AL�nstrona III , who is personally known � � � � Signature of property owner or rep resentative E. D. Armstrong IlI, Esquire �. � N ry pu c, My commission e pi�s'i'•�'s%�;•: JAYNE E. SEARS _.; : : Commiss(on # DD 907040 =; �o; Expires September 2, 2013 P�fj�;,;ho�� 6onCed 71�ru iroy Paln Insurance 800•385-7019 Page 4 of 5— Development Agreement Application — City of Clearwater L. AFFIDAVIT TO AUTHORIZE AGENT: Clearwater I-�using Authority, a non profit oorp�rate.body and politic pursuant to Chapter 421, Florida Statutes (Names of all property owners) 1. That (I am/we are) the owner(s) and record title holder(s) of the foAowing described property (address or generaf location): Parcel No. 17-29-16-00000-110-01Q0 2. That this property constitules the property for which a request for a: (describe request} DeveloFa�nt ��ment approval 3. That the undersigned (has/have) appointed and (does/do) appoint: E. D. Armstrong III, Esc��ire, and Jahnson, Pope, Bokor, Ruppel & Burns, TT,p 11 l.A1Cbt11UV Jt_1.CCl.� 1..1GGL.WGi�-Gt� ii �✓i.+v as (his/their) agent(s) to execute any pefitions or other documents necessary to affect such petition; 4_ That this affidavit has been executed to induce the City of Clearwater, Florida to consider and act on the above described property; 5. That sile visits to the property are necessary by City represantatives in order to process this application and the owner authorizes City representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this appiication; 6. That (Ihve), the undersigned authority, hereby certify thai lhe foregoing is true and correct. Clearwater Housing Autho'rity �,,,,.�.., ��..�, ,.:. -- �% • ' �� :_i... �-_�:::.. �;, Property Owne;r f,�71 ell.xle Rivera, CEO STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS �� .-- �Be�fore me the u2dOe�s(gned, an officer duly commissione� by the Iay�S of the �tate of Florid,3,�.p�his day ot � 11 personally appeared aGC�Lle.Llrie Klvera, c;.r�� who having been first duly sworn Deposes and says that he/she fully understands the contents ot the affidavit that he/she signed. � *of Clearwatex Housing Autho'rity � - ;�, !�/-��. y.�tP.�`•p�c KRtSTN+1T'REZZA Notary ublic My Commission Expires: #' * MY COMMISSION # EE 067464 �� f�� l�.p t j EXPIRES: February 24, 2015 S� P . .,Q (I..�A.,,7T1..,��„l,.,d�l,d.....c...:..... S 1Planning Departmentl4pplicah'on Formsldevefopmen! reviewideveJopment egreement applicetion3.doc Page 5 of 5— Development Agreement Application — City ot Clearwaler EXHIBIT "A" The Northeast '/4 of the Northeast '/4 of Section 17, Township 29 South, Range 16 East, Pinellas County, Florida; less and except the North 50 feet thereof for right-of-way for Drew Street; also less and except the East 33 feet thereof for right-of-way for Bayview Boulevard. EXHIBIT "B" TO DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT APPLICATION BayCare Health System, Inc. Section B.2 Development Agreements Supplemental Submittal Requirements: ■ Statement of the requested duration of the development agreement, which shall not exceed ten years. The duration of the Agreement is 20 years, as stated in the Agreement. ■ Description of all existing and proposed public facilities and services that serve or will serve the development. The development will be served by City of Clearwater utilities, solid waste and fire protection, as stated in Section 7 of the Development Agreement. • Description of the uses desired to be permitted on the land, including population densities and building intensities and heights. The proposed use is a maximum of 300,000 square feet of office use, with a maximum FAR of .20 and a maximum height of 50 feet. • Identification of zoning district changes, code amendments that will be required if the proposed development proposal were to be approved. Current Zoning: Requested Zoning: Current Land Use Designation Requested Land Use Designation: Medium Density Residential (MDR) and Commercial (C) Office (0) Residential Medium (RM) and Residential/Office/Retail (R/O/R) Residential/Office Limited (R/OL) Applications for rezoning and land use plan amendment have been submitted simultaneously with this application. In addition, the applicant has submitted an application for Flexible Standard Development Approval of the proposed site plan. ■ Zoning and land use categories of a(I adjoining properties. Zonin Land Use North Open Recreation/Open Space (across Drew Space��Recreation (R/OS) Street) (OS/R) East Institutional (I) Institutional (I) (across Bayview Avenue) South West Tourist (T) Mobile Home Park (MHP} Mobile Home Park (MHP) Resort Facilities High (RFM) Residential Low Medium (RLM) Residential Low Medium (RLM) � Complete names and addresses of all owners of properties abutting or lying within 200 feet of the subject property as currently listed in the county records as of one week prior to the filing of an application. This list will be provided upon request. #561787 v1 - BayCare/Ex to DVA 2 DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT THIS DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT ("Agreement") is dated 2011 ("Execution Date"), effective as provided in Section 5 of this Agreement, and entered into between BAYCARE HEALTH SYSTEM, INC., a Florida not-for-profit corporation, its successors and assigns ("Developer"), and the CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA, a political subdivision of the State of Florida acting through its City Council, the governing body thereof ("City"). RECITALS: WHEREAS, Sections 163.3220 - 163.3243, Florida Statutes, which set forth the Florida Local Government Development Agreement Act ("Act"), authorize the City to enter into binding development agreements with persons having a legal or equitable interest in real property located within the corporate limits of the City; WHEREAS, under Section 1633223 of the Act, the City has adopted Section 4- 606 of the City of Clearwater Community Development Code ("Code"), establishing procedures and requirements to consider and enter into development agreements; WHEREAS, the Developer has entered into a contract to purchase approximately 39.79 acres of real property located at the southwest corner of Drew Street and Bayview Avenue as more particularly described on Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein ("Property"), which is owned by Clearwater Housing Authority, a non-profit corporate body and politic pursuant to Chapter 421, Florida Statues ("Owner"); WHEREAS, Owner has joined in and consented to this Agreement; WHEREAS, the Developer desires to develop the Property with up to 300,000 square feet of office development, generally conforming to the conceptual plan shown on Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein ("Concept Plan"); WHEREAS, the Developer has requested rezoning of the Property from Medium Density Residential (MDR) and Commercial (C) to Office (0) and a land use plan amendment from Residential Medium (RM) and Residential/Office/Retail (R/O/R) to Residential/Office Limited (R/OL); WHEREAS, the City has conducted such hearings as are required by and in accordance with Chapter 163.3220 Fla. Stat. (2008) and any other applicable law; WHEREAS, the City has determined that, as of the Effective Date of this Agreement, the proposed project is consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan and Code; WHEREAS, the City has conducted public hearings as required by Sections 4-206 and 4-606 of the Code; WHEREAS, at a duly called and advertised public meeting on , 2011, the City Council approved this Agreement and authorized and directed its execution by the appropriate officials of the City; WHEREAS, the City approved the Concept Plan as FLS2011-06011 on , 2011, conditioned upon the approval and execution of this Agreement; and WHEREAS, Developer has approved this Agreement and has duly authorized certain individuals to execute this Agreement on Developer's behalf. STATEMENT OF AGREEMENT In consideration of and in reliance upon the premises, the mutual covenants contained herein, and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto intending to be legally bound and in accordance with the Act, agree as follows: SECTION 1. Recitals. The above recitals are true and correct and are a part of this Agreement. SECTION 2. Incorporation of the Act. This Agreement is entered into in compliance with and under the authority of the Code and the Act, the terms of which as of the Execution Date of this Agreement are incorporated herein by this reference and made a part of this Agreement. Words used in this Agreement without definition that are defined in the Act shall have the same meaning in this Agreement as in the Act. SECTION 3. Property Subiect to this Agreement. The Property is subject to this Agreement. 3.1 The Property currently has land use designations of Residential Medium (RM) and Residential/Office/Retail (R/O/R) and is zoned Medium Density Residential (MDR) and Commercial (C). 3.2 Developer has requested a rezoning to Office (0) and a land use plan amendment to Residential/Office Limited (R/OL). 3.3. The Property is owned by Owner as is evidenced by the deed attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit C. 3.4 The Property is generally located at the southwest corner of Drew Street and Bayview Avenue, within the City limits. SECTION 4. Scope of Proiect 4.1 The Project shall consist of no more than 300,000 square feet of office development on the Property as generally depicted on the Concept Plan. 2 4.2 The Project shall include a maximum of 1,600 parking spaces on the Property, provided such spaces can be accommodated while maintaining the required setbacks and internal landscaping requirements, to be shown on the final site plan approved pursuant to FLS2011-06011. 4.3 The proposed floor area ratio on the Property shall not exceed .20 and the building height, as defined in the Code, shall be a maximum of 50 feet. 4.4 The Project shall comply with the Metropolitan Planning Organization's (MPO) countywide approach to the application of concurrency management for transportation facilities. SECTION 5. Effective Date/Duration of this Agreement. 5.1 This Agreement shall not be effective until 5.1.1 this Agreement is properly recorded in the public records of Pinellas County, Florida, and thirty (30) days have elapsed after having been received by the state land planning agency pursuant to Florida Statutes Section 163.3239 and Code Section 4-606.G.2; 5.1.2 final approval and effectiveness of a land use designation of Residential/Office Limited (R/OL) and a zoning of Office (0) on the Property; and 5.1.3 Developer becomes the fee simple owner of the Property. 5.2 Within fourteen (14) days after the City approves the execution of this Agreement, the City shall record the Agreement with the Clerk of the Circuit Court for Pinellas County. The Developer shall pay the cost of such recording. The City shall submit to the state land planning agency a copy of the recorded Agreement within fourteen (14) days after the Agreement is recorded. In the event that the contingencies described in Section 5.1.2 and Section 5.1.3 above are not satisfied within twelve (12) months from the Execution Date hereof, the City and Developer agree to execute and deliver a termination of this Agreement, in recordable form, which shall be recorded in the Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida at the expense of the Developer. 5.3 This Agreement shall continue in effect until terminated, as defined herein, but for a period not to exceed twenty (20) years. SECTION 6. Obli�ations under this AEreement. 6.1 Obligations of the Develoner 6.1.1 The obligations under this Agreement shall be binding upon and the benefits of this Agreement shall inure to the Developer, its successors in interests or assigns. 3 6.1.2 At the time of development of the Property, the Developer will submit such applications and documentation as are required by law and shall comply with the City's Code applicable at the time of building permit review. 6.1.3 The following restrictions shall apply to development of the Property: 6.1.3.1 The Property and improvements located thereon shall be developed in substantial conformance with the Concept Plan approved as FLS2011- 06011, including any conditions. Any minor revisions or changes to the Concept Plan shall be approved by the Planning and Development Director as a minor modification, pursuant to the Code. Any modifications determined by the Planning and Development Director as either inconsistent or constituting a substantial deviation from the approved Concept Plan will require an amendment to this Agreement in accordance with the procedures of the Act and the Code, as necessary and applicable. Any and all such approved and adopted amendments shall be recorded in the public records of Pinellas County, Florida. 6.1.3.2 The Developer shall obtain building permits and shall thereafter timely obtain required certificates of occupancy in accordance with the approved development order for FLS2011-06011 and Code Section 4-303. Nothing herein shall restrict Developer from seeking an extension of these time frames pursuant to applicable provisions of the Code and of the Florida Building Code or from seeking an amendment to this Agreement. 6.1.3.3 The Developer shall be responsible for the following transportation obligations (collectively, "Transportation Obligations"): (i) Construction of main access to Drew Street (Drive A) on the Property to contain two exiting lanes to separate left and right turning vehicles; (ii) Construction of an eastbound right turn lane on Drew Street at Drive A; (iii) Lengthen the existing westbound left turn lane on Drew Street at Drive A to include 100 feet of full width storage plus deceleration distance; (iv) Construct secondary access to Bayview Avenue (Drive B) to the Property with the driveway to include two exiting lanes to separate left and right turning vehicles; (v) Construct a northbound left turn lane on Bayview Avenue at Drive B to include 175 feet of full width storage plus deceleration distance; (vi) Construct northbound left turn lanes at the intersection of Drew Street and Bayview Avenue; (vii) Install concrete bus pads and bus shelters along Drew Street and Bayview Avenue to accommodate PSTA routes and provide pedestrian access; and 4 (viii) Provide pedestrian crosswalk across Drew Street to connect to the E.C. Moore Complex and a recreational trail to facilitate pedestrian access. The improvements described in Sections 6.1.3.3(i) through 6.1.3.3(v) above are not eligible for transportation impact fee credits. The improvements described in Sections 6.1.3.3(vi) through 6.1.3.3(viii) above shall be eligible for transportation impact fee credits. 6.1.3.4 In the event that the Florida Legislature, Pinellas County and/or the City enact a Mobility Fee requirement which supplements or supersedes the current Pinellas County countywide Traffic Impact Fee Ordinance ("Ordinance"), and the effective date of fee payment under said requirement occurs prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy, Developer shall pay the assessed amount under that Mobility Fee provision instead of, or in addition to, in accordance with that provision, the amount due under the current Ordinance. 6.2 Obligations of the City. 6.2.1 Concurrent with the approval of this Agreement, the City shall promptly process amendments to the land use plan and zoning designations for the Property as set forth in Section 5.1.2 of this Agreement. 6.2.2 The City shall promptly process site and construction plan applications for the Property that are consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, the Concept Plan and that meet the requirements of the Code. 6.23 The final effectiveness of the re-designations referenced in Section 6.2.1 is subject to: 6.2.3.1 The provisions of Chapters 163 and 166, Florida Statutes, as they may govern such amendments; and 6.2.3.2 The expiration of any appeal periods or, if an appeal is filed, the conclusion of such appeal. 6.2.4 The City will assign to Developer (i) transportation impact fee credits for the Transportation Obligations set forth in Sections 6.1.3.3(vi), 6.1.3.3(vii) and 6.1.33(viii) of this Agreement, in an amount equal to the cost of the right-of-way improvements constructed as appropriate; and (ii) transportation impact fee credits based on the previous use of the Property as a 284-unit multi-family development, as to Transportation Impact Fee ordinances in effect at the time the fee is to be paid. 6.2.5 In the event a Mobility Fee requirement is enacted as described in Section 6.1.3.4 of this Agreement, the City will assign to Developer any credits against the Mobility Fee based on the previous use of the Property as a 284-unit multi-family development and credits for design and construction of eligible transportation � improvements specified in Section 6.2.4 above, if such credits are available under the provisions of the Mobility Fee ordinance. SECTION 7. Public Facilities to Service Development. The following public facilities are presently available to the Property from the sources indicated below. Development of the Property will be governed by the concurrency ordinance provisions applicable at the time of development approval, unless otherwise provided by law. With respect to transportation and other public infrastructure and services subject to concurrency requirements, all applicable concurrency provisions for the proposed development have been met. 7.1 Potable water is available from the City. The Developer shall be responsible for all necessary main extensions and applicable connection fees. 7.2 Sewer service is currently provided by the City. The Developer shall be responsible for all necessary main extensions and applicable connection fees. 7.3 Reclaimed water is available from the City. The Developer shall be responsible for all necessary main extensions and applicable connection fees. 7.4 Fire protection from the City. 7.5 Drainage facilities for the Property will be provided by the Developer at the Developer's sole expense. 7.6 Transportation concurrency requirements have been met. 7.7 All improvements associated with the public facilities identified in Subsections 7.1 through 7.5 shall be completed prior to the issuance of any certificate of occupancy. 7.8 The Developer is responsible for the payment of any required impact fees, subject to the credits described in Section 6.2.4 of this Agreement. SECTION 8. Required Local Government Permits. The required local government development permits for development of the Property include, without limitation, the following: 8.1 Site plan approval(s) and associated utility licenses, access, and right-of-way utilization permits; 8.2 Construction plan approval(s); 8.3 Building permit(s); and 8.4 Certificate(s) of occupancy. 0 SECTION 9. Consistencv. The City finds that development of the Property is consistent with the terms of this Agreement, is consistent with the City Comprehensive Plan and the Code. SECTION 10. Termination. 10.1 If the Developer's obligations set forth in this Agreement are not followed in a timely manner, as reasonably determined by the City Manager, after notice to the Developer and an opportunity to be heard, existing permits shall be administratively suspended and issuance of new permits suspended until the Developer has fulfilled its obligations. Failure to timely fulfill its obligations may serve as a basis for termination of this Agreement by the City, (in addition to the termination provisions of Section 5.2 hereo fl, at the discretion of the City and after notice to the Developer and an opportunity for the Developer to be heard. SECTION 11. Other Terms and Conditions. 11.1 Except in the case of termination, until twenty (20) years after the Effective Date of this Agreement, the Property shall not be subject to down-zoning, unit density reduction, or intensity reduction, unless the City has held a public hearing and determined: 11.1.1 That substantial changes have occurred in pertinent conditions existing at the time of approval of this Agreement; or 11.1.2 This Agreement is based on substantially inaccurate information provided by the Developer; or 11.1.3 That the change is essential to the public health, safety, or welfare. SECTION 12. Compliance with Law. The failure of this Agreement to address any particular permit, condition, term or restriction shall not relieve the Developer from the necessity of complying with the law governing such permitting requirements, conditions, terms or restrictions. SECTION 13. Notices. Notices and communications required or desired to be given under this Agreement shall be given to the parties by hand delivery, by nationally recognized overnight courier service such as Federal Express, or by certified mail, return receipt requested, addressed as follows (copies as provided below shall be required for proper notice to be given): If to the Developer: BayCare Health System, Inc. Attention: James Orr 8452 118th Avenue North Largo, FL 33773 7 With copy to: E. D. Armstrong III, Esquire Johnson, Pope, Bokor, Ruppel & Burns, LLP 911 Chestnut Street Clearwater, FL 33756 If to City: City of Clearwater, City Attorney ATTN: Pamela Akin, Esquire 112 South Osceola Avenue Clearwater, FL 33756 Properly addressed, postage prepaid, notices or communications shall be deemed delivered and received on the day of hand delivery, the next business day after deposit with an overnight courier service for next day delivery, or on the third (3`d) day following deposit in the United States mail, certified mail, return receipt requested. The parties may change the addresses set forth above (including the addition of a mortgagee to receive copies of all notices), by notice in accordance with this Section. SECTION 14. Assi�nments. 14.1 By the Developer. The Developer may sell, convey, assign or otherwise dispose of any or all of its right, title, interest and obligations in and to the Property without the prior written notice to the City, provided that such party (hereinafter referred to as the "assignee"), to the extent of the sale, conveyance, assignment or other disposition by the Developer to the assignee, shall be bound by the terms of this Agreement the same as the Developer for such part of the Project as is subject to such sale, conveyance, assignment or other disposition. and Developer shall be released from such obligations that have been assumed by the Assignee. 14.2 Successors and Assigns. The terms herein contained shall bind and inure to the benefit of the City, and its successors and assigns, and the Developer and, as applicable to the parties comprising Developer, their successors and assigns, except as may otherwise be specifically provided herein. SECTION 15. Minor Non-Compliance. The Developer will not be deemed to have failed to comply with the terms of this Agreement in the event such non- compliance, in the judgment of the City Manager, reasonably exercised, is of a minor or inconsequential nature. SECTION 16. Covenant of Cooneration. The parties shall cooperate with and deal with each other in good faith and assist each other in the performance of the provisions of this Agreement and in achieving the completion of development of the Property. SECTION 17. Approvals. Whenever an approval or consent is required under or contemplated by this Agreement such approval or consent shall not be unreasonably withheld, delayed or conditioned. All such approvals and consents shall be requested and granted in writing. : SECTION 18. Completion of Agreement. Upon the completion of performance of this Agreement or its revocation or termination, a statement evidencing such completion, revocation or termination shall be signed by the parties hereto and recorded in the official records of the City. SECTION 19. Entire Agreement. This Agreement (including any and all Exhibits attached hereto all of which are a part of this Agreement to the same extent as if such Exhibits were set forth in full in the body of this Agreement), constitutes the entire agreement between the parties hereto pertaining to the subject matter hereof. SECTION 20. Construction. The titles, captions and section numbers in this Agreement are inserted for convenient reference only and do not define or limit the scope or intent and should not be used in the interpretation of any section, subsection or provision of this Agreement. Whenever the context requires or permits, the singular shall include the plural, and plural shall include the singular and any reference in this Agreement to the Developer includes the Developer's successors or assigns. This Agreement was the production of negotiations between representatives for the City and the Developer and the language of the Agreement should be given its plain and ordinary meaning and should not be strictly construed against any party hereto based upon draftsmanship. If any term or provision of this Agreement is susceptible to more than one interpretation, one or more of which render it valid and enforceable, and one or more of which would render it invalid or unenforceable, such term or provision shall be construed in a manner that would render it valid and enforceable. SECTION 21. Partial Invalidity. If any term or provision of this Agreement or the application thereof to any person or circumstance is declared invalid or unenforceable, the remainder of this Agreement, including any valid portion of the invalid term or provision and the application of such invalid term or provision to circumstances other than those as to which it is held invalid or unenforceable, shall not be affected thereby and shall with the remainder of this Agreement continue unmodified and in full force and effect. Notwithstanding the foregoing, if such responsibilities of any party hereto are thereby limited, to the extent that the purpose of this Agreement or the benefits sought to be received hereunder are frustrated, such party shall have the right to terminate this Agreement upon fifteen (15) days written notice to the other parties. SECTION 22. Code Amendments. Subsequently adopted ordinances and codes of the City which is of general application not governing the development of land shall be applicable to the Property, and such modifications are specifically anticipated in this Agreement. SECTION 23. Governing Law. This Agreement shall be governed by, and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Florida without regard to the conflict of laws principles of such state. SECTION 24. Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in counterparts, all of which together shall continue one and the same instrument. E SECTION 25. Amendment. This Agreement may be amended by mutual written consent of the City and the Developer so long as the amendment meets the requirements of the Act, applicable City ordinances, and Florida law. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have hereto executed this Agreement as of the Execution Date. WITNESSES: Printed Name: Printed Name: Printed Name: Printed Name: BAYCARE HEALTH SYSTEM, INC., a Florida not-for-profit corporation : Stephen Mason President CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA : William B. Horne II, City Manager Attest: Rosemarie Call, City Clerk Countersigned: Frank V. Hibbard, Mayor Approved as to Form: Leslie K. Dougall-Sides Assistant City Attorney 10 STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF PINELLAS The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this_day of , 2011, by Stephen Mason, as President of BAYCARE HEALTH SYSTEM, INC., a Florida not-for-profit corporation, on behalf of the corporation. He is _ personally known to me or has produced as identification. Notary Public Print Name: STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF PINELLAS The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this _day of , 2011, by WILLIAM B. HORNE, II, as City Manager of the City of Clearwater, Florida, who is _ personally known to me or who _ produced as identification. Notary Public Print Name: CONSENT OF OWNER Owner hereby joins in and consents to the terms of this Development Agreement between BayCare Health System, Inc, as Developer, and the City of Clearwater, Florida. WITNESSES: Printed Name: CLEARWATER HOUSING AUTHORITY : Jacqueline Rivera, CEO Address: P. O. Box 960 Printed Name: Clearwater, FL 33757-0960 11 STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF PINELLAS The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this _day of , 201 l, by Jacqueline Rivera, as CEO of the CLEARWATER HOUSING AUTHORITY, who is _ personally known to me or who _ produced as identification. Exhibit A Legal Description Exhibit B Concept Plan Exhibit C Deed 52568.I20611 #562507 v3 - BayCare/Corporate/Dev Agt Notary Public Print Name: 12 EXHIBIT A Legal De:scription The Northeast '/4 of the Northeast '/4 of Section 17, Township 29 South, Range 16 East, Pineilas County, Florida; less and except the North 50 feet thereof for right-of-way for Drew Street; also less and except the East 33 feet thereof for right-of-way for Bayview Boulevard. 0 MOBILE I R�nsicv� ocscre�crbv MOBI�E HOME PARK MOBILE HOME PARK AND TRAVELING RV PARK�NG l0T AE% f?l� 'i DM� B�/iHO. !Ea� ��SiGrvEP�. CH URCH PROPERTY JRCH PROPERTY VE B LEGEND Parcel Boundary �`� VEHICULAR ACCESS C■■••� PEDESTRIAN ACCESS AREAS / / LANDSCAPE BUFFER AREAS �/ SITE DATA: PARCEL SIZE: +1-39.75 Acres EXISTING ZONING: MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL PROPOSED ZONING: PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENTBETWEEN BAYCARE HEALTH SYSTEMS AND CITY OF CLEARWATER PROPOSED USE: OFFICES SETBACKS TO EDGE OF PAVEMENT: NORTH SIDE (FRONT)- ALONG DREW STREET 25' EAST SIDE (fRONT�-ALONG BAYVIEW AVENUE 25' SOUTH SIDE (REAR) 20' WEST SIDE (SIDE) 20' SETBACKS TO BUILDING: NORTH SIDE (FRONT)- ALONG DREW STREET 255' EAST SIDE (FRONT)-ALONG BAYVIEW AVENUE 280' SOUTH SIDE (REAR) 673' WEST SIDE �SIDE) 242' BAYCARE HEALTH SYSTEM, INC. ��" DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT HOR�2 5.<lE� N/A SITE PLAN BAYCARE COPPRATE OFFICE �`�',S;.�E ��o�_ �EF „�MP,p PROJECi NU!�BEF: � � � �� H �� EXHI}3IT C �. l�his Insirumcnt Prcparcd Dy And Rcturn To: Ricardo L. Gihnorc, Gsq. Salcm, Saxon & Niciscn, P.A. P.O. Box 3399 T�mpa, FL 3JG01 Property Appraiser's Parcel 00-113093 RPR-18-2000 11:46Rn PINE�LAS CO BK 10681 PG 2115 i Itll� tlVl IiUI UI� IIIIf �V Il�I ill!! IVI �� ;', �� _ �� _, �'- `� �� . � IdentificationNo.:17-29-1G-00000-Ii0-0100 � �' � '> , �� . � `, ', �,� ;; THIS DEED WAS PREPARED VVITHOUT THE BENEFIT OF A TITLE��A�tC"�i"FI-��" COMMITNIENT, OR SURVEY. ,' ,' ` -' � �� ', �� , � , � WARR4NTY DEED � - - THIS II�TDENTURE, n�ade as of the � day of lylai-ch, 2000i'behyeeri Cleanvater Housing Corporation, Inc., a Florida not-for-profit corporation, �Jhi�s��b�rESS ts 2.1'0 South Ewing Avenue, Clearwater, Florida 33756, as GRANTOR, to th� Cleaa�,a[e�;i-to�isrng Authority, a non-profit corporate body and politic pursuant to Chapter 42��'�lori�a �fatutes, wliose address is 210 South Ewing Avenue, Clearwater, Florida 33756, as �1�ANTFE. �` � Witnesseth that Grantor, for goo� and val,uable�consideration, receipt of which is acknowledged, grants, bargains andSeljs toGiantee al� the real property located inPinellas County, Florida, more particularly describ'ed as;� � -' PAGkS �„ � - - AC;C�1 . ftE:C �� , ,' �•, o+�? � `� __ � �;� ' � �EE EXHIBIT "A" ATTACHED ��' - - � -- � � HERETO.AND MADE A PART HEREOF INl FEE� __. _ ._ � �l.? � - - N��_. _� togeilierwi�h afil ten�anents„3re�editaments and appurtenances thereto, and all covenants, conditions, RLv � restriction$, easementsi t�ghis-of-way and other matters of record. TClil+,� � �L' ,� `, ' � C�: i;r�� '�''ai�ave ar�d-Coa�iold, tl�e same in fee simple forever. laGr.;✓. ' � '-'. _� �� `_' � . .,-�4�id;�r�ntor hereby covenants with Grantee that Grantor is ]awfully_seized of sai�i;lagd"ar�-, Y; ,�fees�ixple; that Grantor has good right and lawful authority to sel! and coqvey s�id la��d; arid�tf�et ;-� ��r�ntor Iiereby fulIy warrants the ti tle to said land and wi I l defend the sa�ne a�ainsGthe la�v�u�xlait�3s' ��_; of�l�6 persons whomsoever. � ?"�' ` �_� , � � � -, i� T i C� p J �r7 f., r�- :� "� _ -T.i 1 — '' ITj i-1 -T� �� _ c= -� ;,,_ , s. . i m —=i Z I .-y ' r= � f._.D —� .T.: m t_J � iT ' l � ^- � .�! - � f'_ — . '1 _L �� " !Tl �� i_' S � Ti�� •• • C1l il_l _ = I—. �� I�i GJF— : ! I — . cT `p u� �r i .: � �� '� `n <_n i .,> c?t � �: :.:� -=� ' '' =- .= r_ _. � ._ .:_ - H� �- _ r "�i r %� '�, � ,� r� i�. � l•—� fTI :,i=� T T -- 1—' f+l ._ �— S �.<' �� r� -ri � �i� -=+ � B PINE�LRS COUNTY FLR, OF'F , REC , BK IOBB 1 PG 21 16 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Grantor has hereunto set its hand and seal the da}� attd year first �', above written. � � _;_ --'.�� WITNESSES: GitANTOR: � � . � ri t N e: � � ' �" �f ( " ,t Print Name: �s � v; �, � �'. r�� ;, STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF PINELLAS 2000, by �.� Housing Corporation, �� CLEARWATER HOUSIN�(J�, ,� CORPORATION, INC., A FLORIDA-NOT= �,' ; FOR-PROFIT COP�PORATION ,' �,' - � � , ; � � , ; � � , �, _ �� , � -- ` ,� By: _ _ Print N e: �'O�rCj� U,� -, ' - " Title: �Al ' ' _ � � , � ' _ , ',� , , , `� ��c'� , .\, �obe.� -- � , / ,� /,/�� n, e�qo�Gledg�d beforehle��iisc7 � day of �'"K.( �C ��, ��'�S � � � � c��.+"i�- •f Clearwater a Florida�nat-foY;profit corporatio .�(n(,�� r 1 __ ' � ; N � ' Pi of Florida or Stamp a e �( i - - - �--�- � S.�'-�C' \ - - � � �c� u ,' , , � � � ', �'.Perso'nally Kn�wn �,OR Produced Identification � _ _ _T}�pe�Qf Identification Produced � k�CL\CV{AV�fISC�DEHD-JAS.D52 .\ , , � `� � i.' i • Pa o.�'YP�B� TiFFANYS. HARRELL x � Notary Pubiic - Staie of Floride "COMMlSSION +M CC 678327 �0� fl.� EXPIRES AUG 27, 2000 � j I I I _ i i I , i THIS DOCOP4ENT OB A POR OF TBIS DOGUHEt7T IS OF POOE ; QDALITY AHD 2iAY BE ILLEGIBLEe ' � P IIJELLRS COUNTY FLfl , � y OFF,REC.BK 1Qgg� p� 2117 '' ;�, �� . „ _ ,, __ '-; � • _ • `, . , � � -. --.. .... -- i . ..,' I �XH��1T'�.�..� - . . . ;;- ;;, ,' i , . � '� ----- _` ` ' I , ,�';� � _ = ; . . .. _ .----- � � �; �, � . __ .. ,, , , � . , _, ___ � spse if�sthus� e=nare�s ot Lhf srorstuaoe.ga`rter or A�oeion i9. I �mship 3f routls. Ra�g� SQ Saat. L1til��f �pq! �he �fosela � ' �0 t�et o� !hs Nii[ c! tho x!} oi J��t��7� R�ip 2! aonth, Rsoq+ te �ut tar riqht-o#-xay i�ar tta�t�e Yetr�t'A� Yh� stst �] - I tat o= !ha �P o! !Ae liE�f ot sed,t� 1T.��ws"ship S! iati�tb, . �a�qo ls Yaot !ar s�i91�tro8�-waY tor� �visv 31vQ.. a},� 2yir�g -. •- . aadt �al,aq !r� tia�l3as count1r.. tlori��t, s,�,�.ae ta .ssoxsnt � I hoe. Ch�r2ss Oon�ar�e a�d- fi�lt� qoa�►�ia, hfa xil�� and ' J�aao iltrkfn' snd �tal�lla�tin. `bS�e iei�. !a t1t� C3ty o! Clavz- I �ratar. lor e�ltiieiaa,� �it�aq��itiita11st3Aa +�d saiasaaataca � owr o}sr soa�h 30, l��t ��nd tt��; tkst 10 !� of !h� 1i7t� oP tb� � �'od iaotimt 17,� �o�a�h3p Z9 �auth. Rar�' �.6 �t, sia�ua� County� Yloti¢a.: � _ : . - ;. - - � , 1 . I .' -_` . I ; �.� , � � � �� . � , �� ,' __. � ___ � �� ;, �� - . .,,.,,.. —