The URL can be used to link to this page

FLD2011-07025; 1552 MYRTLE AVE S; RELIGIOUS COMMUNITY SERVICES � � 1552 S MYRTLE AVE Date Received: 7/1/2011 3:14:31 PM Religious Community Services ZONING DISTRICT: Office LAND USE: ResidentiaUOffice General ATLAS PAGE: 313B PLANNER OF RECORD: PLANNER: Kevin Nurnberger, Planner III - � CDB Meeting Date: September 20, 2011 Case Number: FLD2011-07025 Agenda Item: D. 1. Owner/Applicant/Agent: Religious Community Services, Inc. Address: 1552 South Myrtle Avenue CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT GENERAL INFORMATION: REQUEST: Flexible Development application to permit a 1,000 square foot addition(for a computer/storage room) to existing attached dwellings in the Office (0) District and the Medium Density Residential (MDR) District with a lot area of 59,831 square feet, a lot width of 164.07 feet, front (east) setback of 4 feet (to pavement) and 25 feet (to structure) where 25 feet is allowable, a side (south) setback of five feet (to structure) where five feet is allowable, a side (south) setback of 12.5 feet (to structure) where five feet is allowable, side (north) setback of 10 feet (to pavement) and 12.5 feet (to structure) where 5 feet is allowable, a rear (west) setback of 47 feet (to structure) where 10 feet is allowable, and a rear (west) setback of 40 feet (to structure) where 10 feet is allowable, a building height of 12.4 feet (to midpoint of pitched roo�, and sixteen parking spaces under the provisions of Community Development Code Section 2-304, as well as a reduction to the front perimeter buffer from 15 feet to 4 feet and a reduction to the side perimeter buffer from 10 feet to 5 feet, a request to reduce the Vehicular Use Area interior landscaping from 10 percent to 5.7 percent as a Comprehensive Landscape Program under provisions of Community Development Code Section 3-1202.G., and a request of Termination of Status as a Nonconformity under the provisions of Community Development Code Section 6-109. ZONING DISTRICT: Office (0) and Medium Density Residential (MDR) Districts FUTURE LAND USE PLAN CATEGORY: Residential/Office General (R/OG) and Residential Urban(RU) PROPERTY USE: Current: Attached Dwellings Proposed: Attached Dwellings EXISTING North: MDR District SURROUNDING Attached Dwellings ZONING AND USES: South: MDR and Commercial (C) Districts Attached Dwellings and Assisted Living Facility East: MDR District Attached Dwelling West: MDR District Detached Dwellings Community Development Board—September 20,2011 FLD2011-07025—Page 1 � ANALYSIS: Site Location and Existing Conditions: The subject property is approximately 1.37 acres and is located on the west side of South Myrtle Avenue at the intersection of Howard Street and South Myrtle Avenue. The property consists of two parcels with differing zoning districts and future land use plan classifications. The northernmost parcel (1.0 acres) has a future land use classification of Residential/Office General (R/OG) and is zoned Office (0) District. The southernmost parcel (0.37 acres) has a future land use classification of Residential Urban (RU) and is zoned Medium Density Residential (MDR) District. The property consists of the Religious Community Service Grace House, which was approved in 1995 as a 14-unit apartment complex with an administrative office and activity center. The apartment complex consists of four buildings: an administrative office, a resident activity center, and two apartment buildings. Also located on the property are a playground and 18 off-street parking spaces. It is noted that the project is not classified as a residential shelter use. At the time of its approval in 1995, it was determined that the operation, design, and ancillary facilities would be the same as those provided in an typical apartment complex, particularly those run by non-profit housing groups. Also, when this development was originally approved the zoning at the time permitted attached dwellings on both parcels. With the adoption of the Community Development Code in 1999, the zoning designations as well as the allowable uses for the subject property were changed. These changes resulted in the northern portion of this development being rendered a nonconforming use. Development Proposal: The application proposes a 1,000 square foot addition to the northernmost apartment building for the purpose of a computer lab for the residents, and a small storage area. The addition will be set back 12.5 feet from the north property line consistent with the existing building. The addition will be a single-story masonry structure with similar architectural features to those structures existing on site. There are eighteen parking spaces on site, but the building addition will result in the loss of two parking spaces. As a part of the request, the applicants have requested a termination of status as nonconformity for the existing use. Such an action will allow the attached dwellings to legally exist on that portion of the overall property that is within the O District; thereby allowing the applicants to expand the building. The proposal's compliance with the applicable development standards of the Community Development Code (CDC) is discussed below. Density: Pursuant to the Countywide Plan Rules and Sections 2-301.1 and 2-1001.1, CDC, properties with a future land use plan designation of RU are permitted a maximum of 7.5 dwelling units per acre, while properties with a designation of R/OG are permitted a m�imum of 15 dwelling units per acre. Taken together, the 1.37-acre subject property is permitted a m�imum of 17 attached dwelling units. The existing development consists of 14 attached dwelling units. Community Development Board—September 20,2011 FLD2011-07025—Page 2 Impervious Surface Ratio (ISR): Pursuant to the Countywide Plan Rules and Sections 2-301.1 and 2-1001.1, CDC, properties with a future land use plan designation of RU are permitted a maximum ISR of .65, while properties with a designation of R/OG are permitted a maximum ISR of.75. When averaged together, the 1.37-acre subject property has an ISR of .44 which is well below Code which allows an average ISR of 0.70. Minimum Lot Area and Width: As previously mentioned, the original development was approved by the City as attached dwellings. The zoning district standards applied to this project in the past most appropriately correspond to attached dwellings in the MDR District. Pursuant to CDC Table 2-304, the minimum lot area requirement for attached dwellings is 10,000 square feet. The subject property has a lot area of 59,831 square feet (1.37 acres). The minimum lot width requirement for attached dwellings is 100 feet. The width of the property is 164.07 square feet along South Myrtle Avenue. The proposal is consistent with these criteria. Since subject property consists of two separate parcels of land, the applicant shall record a Declaration of Unity of Title that states unequivocally that the entire property created by the combination of Parcels #21-29-15-00000-440-2500 and 21-29-15-00000-440-2600 or portions thereof by this development shall be regarded as unified under one title as an indivisible building site, and that the property shall be henceforth considered as one plot or parcel of land. Minimum Setbacks: Pursuant to CDC Table 2-304, the minimum setback requirement for attached dwellings is a front of 25 feet, a side of 5 feet and a rear of 10 feet. As built, an existing structure located at the front of the property does not comply with the front setback. The structures have a front (east) setback of 4 feet (to pavement) where 25 feet is allowable. The front setback cannot be met by the current request as it would result in the loss of two needed parking spaces. The remaining structures side and rear setbacks are consistent with the criteria. In regards to the setbacks for the building addition, it will be compliant with the setback standards. The building addition will be setback approximately 154 feet from the front property line. Also, it will have a side (north) setback of 12.5 feet where 5 feet is allowable and it will be built consistent with existing structures. The new addition will meet the development standards in CDC Section 2-304. Maximum Building Hei� Pursuant to CDC Table 2-304, the maximum building height for attached dwellings can range between 30 and 50 feet. The proposed height of the building addition is 12.4 feet (midpoint of pitched roo�. The proposed building height is less than the Code provisions. Minimum Off-Street Parkin�: Pursuant to CDC Table 2-304, the minimum number of off-street parking spaces for attached dwellings is two parking spaces per unit. However,this development was approved at a parking ratio of 1.5 spaces per dwelling unit and it currently has 18 parking spaces for existing dwelling units. As previously mentioned, the building addition will result in the loss of two parking spaces. The applicants proposed to relocate the parking spaces but due to the locations proximity to a mature oak tree, it was suggested by the City that they retain the tree. Any further off-street parking would not be possible given the existing on-site improvements. Although there will be less parking spaces then required by code, CDC Section 3-1404.E. allows Community Development Board—September 20,2011 FLD2011-07025—Page 3 for a reduction of up to 25 percent in the required number of parking spaces if it is necessary to preserve protected trees located on the parcel which the applicant has agreed to do. A parking ratio of 1.5 spaces per unit would have required 21 spaces; with the reduction of 25 percent to the required number of spaces, sixteen spaces would be necessary to meet criteria. Since the new addition will be for the sole use of the residents, it is believed by Staff that the remaining 16 parking spaces will be adequate for the property. The applicant has substantiated the reduction of parking spaces. They state that the RCS Grace House concentrates its efforts on assisting families in returning to permanent housing. As a result of family economic trauma, most families have sold valuable possessions including vehicles. RCS Grace House provides transportation using a program van as well as providing participants with bus passes. For the above findings, the proposed parking space arrangement is acceptable by Staff. Landscapin� A requirement of termination of status of nonconformity is that the landscaping on the subject property shall be brought into compliance with CDC Section 3-1202.D.1. If the site cannot be brought into compliance with the code then the Comprehensive Landscape Program may be used to satisfy landscaping requirements. The applicant has asked for flexibility in front and side perimeter landscape standards, and for a reduction to the interior landscape vehicular use area from 10 percent to 5.7 percent through the Comprehensive Landscape Program. Pursuant to CDC Section 3-1202.D.1, this site is required a fifteen-foot wide landscape buffer along South Myrtle Avenue and ten-foot wide side and rear landscape buffers. As mentioned above, the applicant asks for flexibility to allow a reduction to the front landscape buffer from fifteen feet to four feet (along South myrtle Avenue) and a reduction in the side (south) landscape buffer from ten feet to five feet. The adjoining parcel which is a part of this development has an existing side perimeter landscape buffer that reduces down from ten feet to five foot for a distance of 82 feet; however, the remaining 187 feet of that parcels side perimeter meets the ten foot side perimeter buffer standard. A similar situation exists in the front landscape buffer. A twenty-two foot landscape strip exists for most of the front yard perimeter; however, it reduces down to four feet (for a distance of fifteen feet) to allow for needed parking space on site. Due to the existing site conditions and necessary improvements to the site to comply with termination of status of nonconformity to allow for the building addition through the Comprehensive Landscape Program, existing perimeter landscape buffers widths cannot be increased without altering the parking lot dimensions resulting in a reduction to the number of parking spaces. To mitigate for the deviations to the landscape buffer requirements the applicants propose to add two shade trees (live oaks) to the front perimeter, nine small trees throughout the property for shading and screening, new hedges, foundation plantings, and groundcover as well as retaining existing live oak trees within the existing perimeter landscape buffers to make up for the deficiency in the width of the buffers to visually enhance the property. They also propose to replace an existing three foot high fence with a new three foot high fence in the front yard for child security. Community Development Board—September 20,2011 FLD2011-07025—Page 4 Pursuant to CDC Sections 3-1202.E.1 and 3-1202.E.2, a minimum of ten percent of the gross Vehicular Use Area (VUA) shall be dedicated to parking lot interior landscaping. The applicant has requested a reduction from the required ten percent to 5.7 percent for the parking lot interior landscape standards. A previously mentioned, the building expansion will result in the loss of two parking spaces. Although they are asking for a reduction, the plan will increase the existing VUA percentage to 5.7 percent by converting a 117 square foot remnant of a parking space into green space. For this finding and for the fact that the provision of green space is also in keeping with the standards of termination of status of nonconformity, Staff supports the requested reduction to the parking lot interior landscape area. However, the submitted landscape plan does not indicate that this green space will be landscaped in accordance CDC Sections 3-1202.E; therefore, the applicant shall plant one accent tree, shrubs, and groundcover within the new parking lot green space. Comprehensive Landscape Program: Pursuant to Section 3-1202.G of the Community Development Code, the landscaping requirements contained within the Code can be waived or modified if the application contains a Comprehensive Landscape Program satisfying certain criteria. The following table depicts the consistency of the development proposal with those criteria: Consistent Inconsistent 1. Architectural theme: a. The landscaping in a comprehensive landscape program shall be designed as a N/A N/A part of the architectural theme of the principle buildings proposed or developed on the parcel proposed for development;or b. The design, character, location and/or materials of the landscape treatment X proposed in the comprehensive landscape program shall be demonstrably more attractive than landscaping otherwise permitted on the parcel proposed for development under the minimum landscape standards. 2. Lighting: Any lighting proposed as a part of a comprehensive landscape program is X automatically controlled so that the lighting is turned off when the business is closed. 3. Community character: The landscape treatment proposed in the comprehensive X landscape program will enhance the community character of the City of Clearwater. 4. Property values: The landscape treatment proposed in the comprehensive landscape X program will have a beneficial impact on the value of property in the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. 5. Special area or scenic corridor plan: The landscape treatment proposed in the N/A N/A comprehensive landscape program is consistent with any special area or scenic corridor plan which the City of Clearwater has prepared and adopted for the area in which the parcel proposed for development is located. Solid Waste: The applicant has proposed no changes to the existing on site dumpster enclosure or method of waste collection. The proposal has been found to be acceptable by the City's Solid Waste Department. Si�ht Visibilitv Triangles: Pursuant to CDC Section 3-904.A, to minimize hazards at the driveways, no structures or landscaping may be installed which will obstruct views at a level between 30 inches above grade and eight feet above grade within 20-foot sight visibility triangles. No structures or landscaping is proposed within the site triangles. Community Development Board—September 20,2011 FLD2011-07025—Page 5 Signage: There is no existing signage and the applicant is not proposing any signage. Code Enforcement Analysis: There are no active Code Enforcement cases for the subject property. Termination of Status of Nonconformitv: As mentioned previously, the development proposal includes a request for termination of status of nonconformity to allow attached dwellings in the Office (0) District. At this time, attached dwelling units are not an allowable use in the O District, but were permitted when the property was developed in 1996. The sites attached dwellings lost their conforming status when the City implemented the current Community Development Code. However, the underlying land use category which is Residential/Office General (R/OG) permits a mix of uses such as office, residential equivalent, and residential uses. The criteria for termination of status of nonconformity, as per Section 6-109 and outlined in the table below, including compliance with perimeter buffer requirements, the provision of required landscaping for off-street parking lots and bringing nonconforming signs, lighting and accessory uses/structures into compliance with the Code will be met with this development proposal. Consistent Inconsistent 1. Perimeter buffers conforming to the requirements of Section 3-1202.D shall be X installed. 2. Off-street parking lots shall be improved to meet the landscaping standards established X in Section 3-1202.E. 3. Any nonconforming sign, outdoor lighting or other accessory structure or accessory X use located on the lot shall be terminated, removed or brought into conformity with this development code. 4. The comprehensive landscaping and comprehensive sign programs may be used to X satisfy the requirements of this section. Community Development Board—September 20,2011 FLD2011-07025—Page 6 COMPLIANCE WITH STANDARDS AND CRITERIA: The following table depicts the consistency of the development proposal with the standards of the R/OG future land use category and the MDR District per CDC Section 2-301.1 and Table 2- 304: Standard Proposed Consistent Inconsistent Density RU=7.5 du/ac(2 units) 14 existing attached dwelling units X R/OG =15 du/ac(15 units) ISR 0.75/0.65(0.70) 0.52/036(0.44) X Minimum Lot Area 10,000 sq.ft. 59,831 sq.ft.(1.37 acres) X Minimum Lot Width 100 feet 164.0'7 feet X Minimum Setbacks Front: 25 feet East: 4 feet(to pavement) X* 25 feet(to building) Rear 10 feet West: 40 feet(to building) X 47 feet(to building) Side: 5 feet North: 10 feet(to pavement) X 12.5 feet(to building) South: 5 feet(to building) X 12.5 feet(to building) Maximum Height 30-50 feet 12.4 feet(to midpoint of pitched roofl X Minimum 2 spaces per unit 16 parking spaces X Off-Street Parking (28 spaces) *Existing conditions on site COMPLIANCE WITH GENERAL STANDARDS FOR LEVEL TWO APPROVALS: The following table depicts the consistency of the development proposal with the General Standards for Level Two Approvals as per CDC Section 3-914.A: Consistent Inconsistent I. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, X coverage,density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage development and use of X adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons X residing or working in the neighborhood. 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. X 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the X immediate vicinity. 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, incl�ding X visual,acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts on adjacent properties. Community Development Board—September 20,2011 FLD2011-07025—Page 7 SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION: The Development Review Committee (DRC) reviewed the application and supporting materials at its meeting of August 4, 201 l, and deemed the development proposal to be legally sufficient to move forward to the Community Development Board (CDB), based upon the following: Findin�s of Fact. The Planning and Development Department, having reviewed all evidence submitted by the applicant and requirements of the Community Development Code, finds that there is substantial competent evidence to support the following findings of fact: l. The 1.37 acre subject property is located on the west side of South Myrtle Avenue at the intersection of Howard Street and South Myrtle Avenue; 2. That the northern parcel is located within the Office (0) District with an underlying Future Land Use Plan designation of Residential/Office General (R/OG). 3. That the southern parcel is located within the Medium Density Residential (MDR) District with an underlying Future Land Use designation of Residential Urban (RU); 4. The subject property is the location of the Religious Community Service Grace House which consists of a fourteen dwelling unit apartment complex with an administrative office and activity center; 5. The apartment complex was approved as a residential development in 1995; 6. The application proposes a 1,000 square foot building addition for the purpose of a computer lab for the residents use; 7. The proposed building addition will be 12.4 feet in height(to midpoint of pitched roo fl; 8. The new building addition will be set back 12.5 feet from the north property line; 9. The proposal includes a termination of status of nonconformity to allow the attached dwelling units to exist legally in the Office (0)District; 10. The proposal will result in the loss of two parking spaces leaving a total of sixteen parking spaces on site; 11. The proposed Comprehensive Landscape Program will provide additional landscaping within the landscape perimeter buffers, interior parking lot area, along building foundations, and throughout the site as well as retain existing live oak trees; 12. That, the 1.37-acre subject property is permitted a maYimum of 17 attached dwelling units, only 14 attached dwelling units exist on site which is below what is allowable; 13. That, the overall Impervious Surface Ratio is 0.44 which is less than the maximum allowable of 0.70; 14. Based on the existing character of the surrounding area, the proposed building addition is compatible and consistent with the character of the immediate area; and 15. There are no active Code Enforcement cases for the subject property. Conclusions of Law. The Planning and Development Department, having made the above findings of fact, reaches the following conclusions of law: 1. That the development proposal is consistent with the Flexible Development standards as per Section 2-301.1 and Table 2-304 of the Community Development Code; 2. That the development proposal is consistent with the General Standards for Level Two Approvals as per Section 3-914.A of the Community Development Code; 3. The proposal is consistent with the criteria of the Comprehensive Landscape Program as per Section 3-1202.G of the Community Development Code; and Community Development Board—September 20,2011 FLD2011-07025—Page 8 4. The proposal is consistent with the criteria for Termination of Status as a Nonconformity per Section 6-109 of the Community Development Code. Based upon the above, the Planning and Development Department recommends APPROVAL of Flexible Development application to permit a 1,000 square foot addition (for a computer/storage room) to existing attached dwellings in the Office (0) District and the Medium Density Residential (MDR) District with a lot area of 59,831 square feet, a lot width of 164.07 feet, front (east) setback of 4 feet (to pavement) and 25 feet (to structure) where 25 feet is allowable, a side (south) setback of five feet (to structure) where five feet is allowable, a side (south) setback of 12.5 feet (to structure) where five feet is allowable, side (north) setback of 10 feet (to pavement) and 12.5 feet (to structure) where 5 feet is allowable, a rear (west) setback of 47 feet (to structure) where 10 feet is allowable, and a rear (west) setback of 40 feet (to structure) where 10 feet is allowable, a building height of 12.4 feet (to midpoint of pitched roo fl, and sixteen parking spaces under the provisions of Community Development Code Section 2-304, as well as a reduction to the front perimeter buffer from 15 feet to 4 feet and a reduction to the side perimeter buffer from 10 feet to 5 feet, a request to reduce the Vehicular Use Area interior landscaping from 10 percent to 5.7 percent as a Comprehensive Landscape Program under provisions of Community Development Code Section 3-1202.G., and a request of Termination of Status as a Nonconformity under the provisions of Community Development Code Section 6-109, subject to the following conditions: Conditions of A�proval: l. That, a building permit be obtained for the parking lot improvements, landscaping and building improvements; 2. That, the applicant record a Declaration of Unity of Title with Pinellas County that combines the parcels#21-29-15-00000-440-2500 and 21-29-15-00000-440-2600 together; 3. That, fhe applicant shall plant one accent tree, shrubs, and groundcover within the new parking lot green space; 4. That, the applicant shall obtain a building permit for any new fencing on the subject property; 5. That, prior to the issuance of a building permit, all outstanding comments from the Engineering Department shall be addressed; and 6. That, prior to the issuance of a building permit, all outstanding comments from the Environmental Department shall be addressed. Prepared by Planning and Development Department Staff: evin W. Nu erger, Planner III ATTACHMENTS:Location Map;Aerial Map;Zoning Map;Existing Surrounding Uses Map;and Photographs S:IPlanning DepartmentlC D BIFLEX(FLD)IPending casesl Up for the nezt CDBIS.Myrtle 1552-Religious Community Services(0)(MDR)- 2011.xx-KWNIReligious Community Services Staff Report.docx Community Development Board—September 20,2011 FLD2011-07025—Page 9 Kevin W.Nurnberger 100 S Myrtle Avenue Clearwater,FL 33756 727-562-4567 kevin.nurnber�r(�a,myclearwater.com PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE Planner III March 2011 to present Planner II October 2010 to March 2011 City of Clearwater, Clearwater, Florida Duties include performing the technical review and preparation of staff reports for various land development applications, the organization of data and its display in order to track information and provide status reports, and making presentations to various City Boards and Committees. Planner County of York, Yorktown, Virginia 2007 to 2009 Reviewed residential, commercial and mixed use development site plans to ensure compliance with planning, zoning, subdivision, historic preservation, and environmental standards as well as design criteria, specifications, regulations, codes and ordinances. Led pre-application meetings with residents, neighborhood organizations, contractors, and developers regarding future projects which included state and local government agencies. Site Assistant Gahan and Long Ltd, Belfast, Northern Ireland 2006 to 2007 Enforced Article 3 of the Planning Order (NI) with land owners, developers and district councils on procedures relating to archaeological and built heritage remains on proposed development sites. On site assistant to project manager during the archeological process throughout the pre-development stage. Development Planner Versar Inc, Fort Story/Fort Eustis, Virginia 2005 to 2006 Developed survey strategies for the Cultural Resource Manager by reviewing local and state planning documents, the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Preservation Planning on Federal installations, the Virginia Department of Historic Resources, the Virginia Department of Transportation plan, and Virginia Power's public utility plan in the predevelopment stages of new development and building expansion projects to ensure protection of historic properties. City Planner City Planning Commission, New Orleans, Louisiana 2000 to 2005 Primary subdivision planner assisting applicants throughout the subdivision process in accordance with the zoning and subdivision regulations of the City of New Orleans. Reviewed various zoning and conditional use applications. Prepared and presented staff reports to the City Planning Commission and Board of Zoning Adjustments. EDUCATION University of New Orleans,LA MA Urban and Regional Planning(2004) State University of New York at Buffalo,NY BA Anthropology(1999) Y - L�KEVIE'N � W SOUTH � - .�•�� 9 7 p � d ;1 � � � `s e ,� D 57 � F � Z 0 ` d _ - ':� _ � � Q � z i °•��...�.,�`.:`:,'.'�c:;.�;i�.,,;..'',.',' � � ...... .....:• .� � g f E 5T �.'��.'.'',.':"i::'.':'-�'-.1�;�::':•':�.':'.;:.:;:�.',"�'�:�.1 W NGSLEY ST ;�i � d � -- � � M1YLENN:�N $�- N a QUEEN ST ' �� :� � QUEEN 3G Z ��a m ALh1A � +isve ;;8��:��4+F,::•.%.�•'•:.,��.�'r':';..';..,;�.,�,,I BLVD — ` Y O :,.:, •'i L �7f15 Q `� :.�`�-�! �~ PROJECT ` ww�m3on Ln p�.�r.:� �»^1AY g � Y �. � �rt�t:ir�tr�t�:�:'•:::• SITE �"':: :.� � �''•�.�._.::�,..�....,..�_� a: � „ ° W v:u�.;�x w r. -::;•,�;tz'�.,p � � � 4 Q a -:.}�QVf��rN;;:;.:�:=:::`:�'�:-;;:�-, , tiv000��,�ma � � �_lr: .'`r:. ::;;�::':::- :i _ �,�,_`�,�..��..":;;�:;;:::.. Z p_ .�:::':::,::::::;� o .. .. .:•. ,=;��:;�. o � � � �;, � ��,B�R �. '-t�tt�dl.�H�: '"`.�:' . : � �' a a a a �' �. _��'';:::�':'•.:� a - ��'�� ::�::::....:,::_; . .. • �b .�:..:�:,:.:::. � � :, :.i.�a.F!��'-:�•:'.��.._.:�':; �� • • -_ _::&.:��-:�. ',.i Q H04VRRD � `�: Z 0 �� ° } � ,� � o � t .�baicTG�f-. . .•�' ..� '1 6RYANT � � p s � cj � .;' ;�}5:�'_.�_ wl;;a�� ' � rn a — �. :;�:'._ '.� � � � �- J z a •� fi •......�..�T...�.. .�r�i�ti.+�.;r,+w...�r �e li�l �..� �rr-�..�...... _ •i.•_.=_ _ .T+�.. ;.. T.%�. RC +�.^,� -:� _} .M1. ' �"13:. '�'•�r�. - - �R�' - ��Cl ' - - ..+:ii.:i:r+::ii: .:�i.L, a . ��Y�c'�:�',:�:�='.�'-=:-� ,' .i :'� - r�1. .a�r.� '� ��,.�: �� x ' �.� ..�C"... ' .� � i� .f I�.� C7 Q ,: :i��'J'l�":•':;'i:�iiii� .:::,. - L LDL_ �' .�G,f.. ..til � i " ::a L-�• �YTrTlAN�� .�..... . '� .(J.' .7 ��_ ,•'� - _ _ �".:'- :I .�'. .�f: f• ._� �/ �� .� i:� '.�.��i _ _ '4L�� ,-�•• .. t -:'-,,.;�. .��w� �:.i.' l .'�' �lrn �4::'? S,. ..�-. .�� ::t� ��- �- ;�,. rr+:��: _}�..:. .:�y'� :� :� t� :�'7••TI�!"�'• .�• • •�. ' :�!f�;�'.'_ � •�.. u :�::. .�_, ��5i:�,:. .�'';:: i�� - :Ci+�':' .3::'•:=r': :�: _�..,. :�@C�:+E� �3A �;. �. �� :�.''-;:' - - - �r. - - •�� _ :�•. �'. ,�'�••7�'r ��..�• _ ''�i f .�••::�:� .C��.�.�'��,��r.,�-''- 1� ... .. . :..•�. ............:..� � :..� �.�.�.�.:..;}.�.� -.�1;,:�::�....�...}:: . .,-, � . .�.: .'." ' �� ....._. ..::.•�:.::.•- ..�i;;�:' �.�..:!.......... ...��....... ..�.�.;;�. �� ....... •.�: _ ::,��.-'.: . •C-�L: •��'�:" ��.' �. .�'�•Y " .......:......::::�::....:':_'.'.;: ;''�.'.:�.:_�::'.i.'•;:�. _''''.:��_...... .�_..-.. .._�..;...:�.�:::•:�'�'�:._��:: . �� :::3 �'r�=�:::::::..:...::.:.::••: .�°¢;'��. •�:�:=:�:':�:='>�J;r:::';:;•:�::;:::;:•:i:'„�:::;'; :��'� ,�:'�- ... - :'�:p�.7... '�R• D1�{. .�_. LOCAT►ON Owner: Religious Community Services, Inc. Case: FLD201 1-07025 Site: 1552 South Myrtle Avenue Property Size: 1.003 acres (43,717 sq. ft.) 0.37 acres 16,200 s . ft. PIN: 21-29-15-00000-440-2500 Atlas Page: 313B 21-29-15-00000-440-2600 '— - --'_ _�„ i_- - �- —.l J. I �_ ',_ 1 i � I � -- � WOODLAWN ST -- ", - , �, � �, �� o � v � `'� `'r� '.�u`� I'u� i� � �'I �o ,I �o ,I'� �o I�o � �, m 'u w eo a y �' , I �,, ' '. ' � ''�1514 , E o �� I � I I , I I �� ? 2 I l �� I 1 IW --1- 1 ' � I �s�a�, -- '�I_ 1506 � I 1516�,�, �'�..,�,--1511� � � 1512�� i 1511 i � - �. �i . . 1510 � 1513 � ._--� � - _- W � Q , , , , i_ I I --- �'. 1515 1516,0 1514 Q I, �i 1510'i 1507 -� � . , � 1514'r4 Z �' 151534 �' � - -I 1518�1J .. .. ,'� ,, 1519 1518',~ � � � -� 1516 � ' Z 1520; Q �I 1525 I J 1511 1528 �... I IQ --- Q i '�, ,. W -i 1528A ' � 'I 1522�U 1522 y � 1522 }I 1534 (111 1525 �iy 1525% �. '�'� 1522A I 7�/ i 1524 �.., � 1519 ..A � 1530I 1526� j�iy� '�, 1540�`� . 1526A li 1527 � 1527 . r''-.,... 1533 - _ ! m; 1528 i � 1530 . . ' 1529 I � � � 1544 '�, � m, 1537 �., 1540 1534 ; 1535 , � ' � ,-- � 1545 .. 1542 1538 ��, - 1537 , � 1549 ...� ... 1541 � 1548 �� , � 1546 1544 .... -. -. 1541;4 ' . 1548��, _ ._ . 1550,i ,54s ■ HOWARD ST __ _.._._. 1552 � � � ', 1 . ''�� j � ■ I � f 1573 1558 � i 1559 �� '�o I. o _ ��,., ■�� . � �� `° 1560 .. � . ' 1564 ! '�.. � � 1566 :� � 1560 ��i 1568 I � ��. �� ' �.� ... �I . 1570 O ',,., . . 1576 I ,� �, W �s�� . �� 15�5 ��. � � � � ,I ' � 'I ti � Q � � C�� ,�� W � � 5� iN � O . � � � �, �I 1581 � �o 1 0 58 �. � I —-- i � � �1�9p �� il ��, i 1584 I 1591 . I �gp .,. ... ' 1590 � . �' �� 1593 � � .. � 1�90 ' � _ � '',. � ', � _—_.. o �i � . � 1594 1595 ^ . . ZONING Owner: Religious CommunityServices, Inc. Case: FLD2011-07025 Site: 1552 South Myrtle Avenue Property Size: 1.003 acres (43,717 sq. ft.) 0.37 acres 16,200 s . ft. PIN: 21-29-15-00000-440-2500 Atlas Page: 313B 21-29-15-00000-440-2600 � ° WOODLAWN ST h e.� y ' O O O M h 01 01 p�p I�� `Ir � 2 '"r� , m ro ro �m m m m� 3 � � � � `0�a ; �' I � � ✓, � 54 �I 13 5 � � sl ? z � � � I 1 2 ' IyI q� �g �8 i0 7 _ 1 z 3 2 � 1514 2 1510 l� 1513 1508 � 1 1511 _ �_ _ 15 �1 > 1518 55 �6 .{ Q ^+�5 3 1510 1507 a 1575 _ �y _ ��_ 151 uros151 / Z 1515'/: � 4 1518 ',� - - - 53 _ 18 ---- - � q 51 B y 1519— �2- - i 9 1518 �/,2 15 � Q 15 J 1511 5 1528 51 20 __ Q �3 W 5 1528A 5Lq _ ��_ 152 5 2 5'1� s 1525 49 mna15 Z y 152 r � 1534 N _ — - -- -- - 6 1524 V � � N 3 4� 24 _153 28 aais N r 6 1540 � � 46 25 ��15 1� �� o I 1527 8 r- 1533 q5 26— - _ m _ 44. _ zZ _ ,ss& aa,6 �� 8 I a��r,}� - - 9 — D _ — 1 L �I I— - -7 ,� a� _ zs _ � 9592�12000�� m 1537�_ � _1540 9 1 5 3 4 1 5 3 5 �p L— —. _1 30 154�y� _ 31 154 �0 1538 1537 �� Sq�9 3z" AO/78 1541 8 1548 , 33 1`� 176 A c�c� 1� 1544 1�1% 12 ' _3i 3a 154 `�g0 36 35 155 ��°e ■ O ,� HOWARD ST mna ■ auzs 1552 ■ , `e° � I I � �' � _2 I ' I I � �g 1558 1559 �2 �0�4 �5 6 �I� �g aano15 ■��■ _a °° 15 0 � — 5 _g 1584 °�� 6 — — 1C4588 .,- r — � �,. — — N ; �5836 � � ; 1580 — 8 � _ _ i1588 � g � � ta570 � aaz' _ `? — — 1 � �� 757?t0 p 14578 y 15 � m & — _�� 16 — ,� _ iz 158� � — — — _ _�? _ iN � � � _ �a _ — - 1e — � � 1581 is _ 19 2 ' is —Zo — � p � zz z3 Za z 1584 �� — —21 — h 159 � — — — 18 22 i 459A � 6 5 3 1590 _ _ 19 _ 23_ o� 20 24 1yg$ �� 62478 � � � � a 1594 so 21 — 90 —25� �� 26 EXISTING CONDITIONS Owner: Religious Community Services, Inc. Case: FLD2011-07025 Site: 1552 South Myrtle Avenue Property Size: 1.003 acres (43,717 sq. ft.) 0.37 acres 16,200 s . ft. PIN: 21-29-15-00000-440-2500 Atlas Page: 3138 21-29-15-00000-440-2600 ,y, �a'�.. n c`+y . . '�� . j '�9 '"'+t'...a y�: _ , �� o- i ` •� { ` � �� Mr�y . .�`�� r + . . ,� .. . � ,� -vr?�7�' F��.k `c � y . � ',,aj�.?ti,... .:�� d r� � `�� t.;: .. � � , � .,�;. � ' . 2 � �t��,,f " .er , ;; , � _.. ,.��` _ ��, :t� , .�r, .� ,� ,,� 1�, .� � J�; �" ��'"Ic ,. . .%� � �x "7': .s. " i � . j , y � + J1 I Jo� �"d� �. i� ^ ��,+' �.� ' 1 . p �i... .id�.;, � ,'X IG � �Z'"�Y° .i ,., flir �7 , , a,,.' _.• f�� . , �- , :� �� 5^a��¢�'rt� �R �� .�• '�.' ��•'k � �C i ,►:Q;, ,.`w�+' , '.� + ?/<� . ' � "k,,,+ 'y��....5� ^�`��y .kr�� -� .�rq�' .�. „r =.t e. .-if. -r+•. .-f')�w A�. i:,�� ...,�i .,, . ;: ry� i� tyt." „�� ..� r�i�„,��7 ��., r��< '� ! '�r. ...r� 'X7"y�w iy�;� : ' �"''�C ? �4 �y�� • '.`r a k x�,� ��g wW Y .ry -�+ . � „�,, l�s r� K, ,ry��'�. � _ �S•`q �� ?f4�#`'��"� �",,;�'}! ('f>4..�� .��✓n y��} ,�d A � f�� y,�p'�x'.�J~.• J 4°�`•�.' I♦ .{�f • M1.�. 'i � .�r1'� �'o}wf"��..� ��!' � °-P 'b d - � � . �{ ��.��. ;�+�` 'G l'�i l. � � .+•, :� '.{ ..1� t,-. � m� F�;.�.��'t.. y . . � �. �� . � � .. '� t'�s� �''Y�,w �y � '�u � v. � e M, F � ✓,� �+�� , �� ` � �1' ��'a.f-� >, ` �-,fn��Y ,��°#�� ?,� J{i� � x a.+ � �j...'._ ;�..� _ 1 1 ;'�, � . .� '. � ��y"�, i t � ;? ,k'� ��.+� .. '�:vr ai.,:. ; �,. y� p.;�.�.: �° �rS" +�''�y qt.:'6 .`(.:. �r,� i...� �` 4. 'a. +.t >� � . ��. "� ✓ ! tt s' 4 ie.�,: �`L p',� �;y�� '�i.. ti,,. .. r� :., tc�.a * }{.1.. ,, I".. .�•: � r :;,n ,t''g: ..' ` : . W�Ay�� '$W�i{ ��u� y � .:fr� �, '.� y"� • '� x , '' '�' ` ' ,�'� r� '�. ; .Yyo� ' , P,��[�"�� ,� ■��;'� u �f'�9k,�.,� � -"'u^;� • � +. `i'� .. � e•�x, ` f�� .�,rr ,y'� � .. '., . .. e,�` ,�- �;:, 3 fl�F.� -;t . . 4Z �� '. � r . !y��M��, ` � E u,�� ±�, ,'t: ,/. '��' �r r tw.''.' i 7 .:-, �t �'�?' . � :: t � �i �` �#� ' � � :i. � .,.�� :��`�.r r*�. �� A�� ,�A .a� '� . nLi 9C �.t`�� `x t. ,� ,��s ��{ ,ti .. d1. �� 'ti,i�� .f. �..w . ', � t>f '.7' r"� dw''� � r �,, y'•1L '.a t rri' o h ��1,t r �� w��b r .(�,y _y # '�.,� �y'i� �,f J� r�� li T �? ��A�:. :�k. M1,:.G� ,�'� �ce j{�� r}��_ly��, �'n .#��":�#!'' �;.t: yµ 't'�y.. n• .•W, t:f.. yy 1 V`�! " ! , !' �.,.�yl � �".... � . V+, . vf r ` •� `° 'k.i� �ixr i r.� � ��o�. �� s � , '�� j S �.!A .T�a 9��f �y '� 4}' � 1 �l • � ry `� f� .re�is.'.�� `� '�*'t�, r 'i:+•�,;:�_ ��j�ti��r� �,�' �t�.. � �.� � � . yi��,' �,�� 1 "� �� . .. �s� �.'t^y�fl� ^�� 'h;,7�/. :1�@�1f��F. .d,•n� ..v �y� �}� � �+�.�} f, �"� � ,�.rtP� .�;s; t �i� �� r F;a�a .�' t%� ,�.,r�� ' -� �3 �.�,i ri �� ti �,!. • > } � -!t r n' s; 4.. �� . r , ,'��' '�'�� '. � �� h �l. � �': , T�i , :d�I" �. �� ., ��. „� ` �'.�� .�1�' �,� ,r�.°' ,�Y�i � . s� �r��'` �v s� -_ i�.��i� ,H" ��. y'«!", ., �:. .. � ��36f_'?.e� � r 1 � 1 � � �� • � • � � • � � � � � � • � � � � •�� 1� • ' � • � • ' • �� • � �� ' • ��— i � �/�� •�� f:'�- �. "° .. � � - ,,.�..s. �IIIw� � ,, _.. � � , , � : .� tiy � ;_� � n,�Ili�:,,.,�ia�i�r�lliil,� . _ � :�� . _ ._#�; �,,:, iii�„�� ._ - �... � _. .. °:w � �� --.- k^,•- � �'`'� r , � - , '��"`` , � � „ `;c�:>3 . ., � ' ° ,. � � ... � '' - , -_:.>, .-='r� - °'lT'}�'.�'#.Wr,r.rra,r�.. <,�.�:•. . .....__ . -x . �:_:_. .. .x . ::,g, t ,'/� . ��.:� . �},.. ��°.. .4.M" ..r...r , .. Looking W at subject property. Looking N at proposcd location of building addition 'At"'�� T � �� . . � � � -�� ,,> � ��_ V . _ . � . _ „ . , : . . . .,i , o�l�f �, I .� �}.; ,�,,4+� �. . . �� 1� �� A q . ��• J t y� �f 1�;'!`�"� :4r '� �� a � # � � • „ _. :, �F - � er1.� .w+wr � � � ` . .. .,t '.-.-; .._-�. . ."` ,� , ..F: ^ , ,. .. ., .._,._.. �, � v: ... � - . . � � �� —° . �� oe r��er, .. _ . . �.. .. t.�� .. Looking W at subject property and proposed building site Looking S along South Myrtle Avenue `.� � ��~�. ;��- t � �� , a I �,�� ti��. � � � - _ i.� - : ..__._.._.,„_,. ..r .--�. .�..:» _, . ,..... �.a .. � .... .:. ' ^� �::. �.. �. �� ` , �r. . .,.:� `,�a:. .... . .w . _...._ �� :,�T~� �} � �� r��'� ��i = Q,�M '�a ,i"1� '� � 'e'?�J��",y!a,_','� �:'+�+`--� a .....*� � "��i r �,c�..:.,�`� i'; C' j �^ti,, .,4'"a�.& � *'A , A "�,t �'.i :a�- ., � � r.`"':7t 4�T� 'ras';tf:',".� . , -, .� ��y. �'. .� s. � �� x .> .�y:. . >.. '¢� w'��:.,��'' 'y�,��r,�t t �t ',.;�,., � � .. . �'•, � . t. �Il�� . . . . . it � �� r �� .....-..,."°'°`.'�+c+"�" _ _ 3 lL._. '�.... ti.� b��+'a � ,n. ''ktr . ' _ . Looking N from subject property Looking NE at property located directly across form subject • property. 1552 South Myrtle Avenue FLD2011-07025 f r t � � Planning & Development CASE#: LL Department RECEIVED BY(staff initials): ° � earwater C/arwater,M lor da 33756 DATE RECEIVED: - Telephone: 727-562-4567 � Fax: 727-562-4865 ❑ SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION ❑ SUBMIT 14 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION-Plans and application are required to be collated,stapled,and folded into sets ❑ SUBMIT FIRE PRELIMARY SITE PLAN:$200.00 ❑ SUBMIT APPLICATION FEE$ 1.205 * NOTE: 15 TOTAL SETS OF INFORMATION REQUIRED (APPLICATIONS PLUS SITE PLAN SETS) FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION (Revised 05.04.2010) �PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT� A. APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A) APPLICANT NAME: R2I1 ious Communi Services, Inc. MAILINGADDRESS: 5O3 S. M81'tlil Lllthef KI11 Jr. Ave, Clearwater, FL 33756 PHONE NUMBER: (727) 584-3528 FAX NUMBER: 727 587-7747 CELL NUMBER: (727)254-7107 EMAIL: DU��811.0001@y@gt11211.COft1 PROPERTY OWNER(S): R@II ious Communi S21'VIC2S, �fIC. ' List ALL owners on the deed AGENT NAME: HOd @ M2118 ement, LLC MAILING ADDRESS: 8770 S@I111f1012 BOUI8V8Pd, Seminole, FL 33772 PHONE NUMBER: (813)507-0506 FEVC NuMBER: 813 464-7763 CELL NUMBER: (813) 507-0505 EMAi�: Hod eLLC tam aba .rr.com B. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A) PROJECT NAME: RCS G�BC@ HOUSe PROJECT VALUATION: $150,000 STREETADDRESS 1552 So. M rtle Avenue, Clearwater, Florida 33756 PARCEL NUMBER(S): 21-29-15-00000-440-2500 PARCEL SIZE(acres): PARCEL SIZE(square feet): 43,714 BEG 556.8FT N &30FT W OF SE COR TH N 89D15'09"W 420 FT TH NOD20'51"E 100FT TH LEGAL DESCRIPTION: S89D51'25"E 113.75 TH N25D 13'42"E 3.35FT TH S89D12' 20"E 304.84FT TH SOD20'51"W 103.97FT TO POB CONT 43116 SQ FT MOL PROPOSE�usE�s): Current Pro ert Use: 0311 A artments 10 units to 49 units Z:\Business Docs111006 RCS Grace House\Permittinglcompleted Flexible Development(FLD)5 2010.docx Page 1 of 7 ,� , t Flexible Development application to permit a 1,000 square foot addition (for a computer/storage room)to existing attached dwellings in the Office(0) District with a lot area of 43,714 square feet, a lot width of 104.07 feet, front(east) setback of 4 feet (to pavement)and 30 feet(to structure)where 25 feet is allowable, a side (south) setback of zero feet(to structure)where 5 feet is allowable, side (north) setback of 10 feet(to pavement) and 12 feet(to structure)where 5 feet is allowable, and a rear �ESCR�PTioN oF REQUEST: (West) setback of 40 feet(to structure)where 10 feet is allowable, a building height of 12.4 feet(to midpoint of pitched roofl, and a reduction from eighteen to sixteen parking spaces under the provisions of Community Development Code Section 2-304, as well as a reduction to the front perimeter buffer from 15 feet to 4 feet and side perimeter buffer from 10 feet to zero feet as a Comprehensive Landscape Program under provisions of Community Development Code Section 3-1202.G., and a request of Termination of Status as a Nonconformity under the provisions of Community Develo ment Code Section 6-109. Specifically identify the request (include number of units or square footage of non-residential use and all requested code deviations;e.g. reduction in required number of parking spaces,specific use,etc.) DOES THIS APPLICATION INVOLVE THE TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS (TDR), A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT,OR A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED(CERTIFIED)SITE PLAN? YES_ NO_X_ (if yes,attach a copy of the applicable documents) C. PROOF OF OWNERSHIP: (Code Section 4-202.A.5) � SUBMIT A COPY OF THE TITLE INSURANCE POLICY,DEED TO THE PROPERTY OR SIGN AFFIDAVIT ATTESTING OWNERSHIP (see page 7) D. WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 3-913.A) !r� Provide complete responses to the six(6)GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA—Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail: 1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale,bulk,coverage,density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. The proposed one-story addition will be designed to match and connect to the existing building on site 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. The proposed one-story addition will be designed to match and connect to the existing building on site and will not hinder or impact the use or value of adjacent properties. 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety or persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use. The proposed development is a small computer learning center designed and built according to all codes and current building standards. 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. The proposed development will not increase traffic or impede current traffic pattern or flow. 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. The proposed development will match and connect to existing building on property having no impact on community character. 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts, on adjacent properties. There will be no change in the scope of services offered on property and addition is designed to match existing structures which have little impact on visual, acoustic and olfactory environment of the surrounding properties. Z:\Business Docs\11006 RCS Grace House\Permitting\completed Flexible Development(FLD)5 2010.docx Page 2 of 7 , • WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Flexibility Criteria) �]j Provide complete responses to the applicable flexibility criteria for the specific Use as listed in each Zoning District to which the waiver is requested(use separate sheets as necessary)—Explain how each criteria is achieved,in detail: Flexible Development application to permit a 1,000 square foot addition (for a computer/storage room)to existing attached dwellings in the Office (0) District with a lot area of 43,714 square feet, a lot width of 104.07 feet, front(east) setback of 4 feet(to pavement) and 30 feet(to structure)where 25 feet is allowable, a side(south) setback of zero feet (to structure)where 5 feet is allowabie, side (north) setback of 10 feet(to pavement) and 12 feet(to structure)where 5 feet is allowab�e, and a rear(west) setback of 40 feet(to structure)where 10 feet is allowable, a building height of 12.4 feet(to midpoint of pitched roofl, and a reduction from eighteen to sixteen parking spaces under the provisions of Community Development Code Section 2-304, as well as a reduction to the front perimeter buffer from 15 feet to 4 feet and side perimeter buffer from 10 feet to zero feet as a Comprehensive Landscape Program under provisions of Community Development Code Section 3-1202.G., and a request of Termination of Status as a Nonconformity under the provisions of Communit Develo ment Code Section 6-109. E. STORMWATER PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteria Manual and 4-202.A.21) � A STORMWATER NARRATIVE MUST BE SUBMITTED WITH ALL APPLICATIONS.All applications that involve addition � or modification of impervious surface, including buildings, must include a stormwater plan that demonstrates compliance with the City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteria manual.A reduction in impervious surface area does not qualify as an exemption to this requirement. � If a plan is not required,the narrative shall provide an explanation as to why the site is exempt. �'C ❑ At a minimum,the STORMWATER PLAN shall include the following; ❑ Existing topography extending 50 feet beyond all property lines; ❑ Proposed grading including finished floor elevations of all structures; ❑ All adjacent streets and municipal storm systems; ❑ Proposed stormwater detention/retention area including top of bank,toe of slope and outlet control structure; � A narrative describing the proposed stormwater control plan including all calculations and data necessary to demonstrate compliance with the City manual. ❑ Proposed stormwater detention/retention area including top of bank,toe of slope and outlet control structure; ❑ Signature and seal of Florida Registered Professional Engineer on all plans and calculations. � COPY OF PERMIT INQUIRY LETTER OR SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT (SWFWMD) PERMIT SUBMITTAL(SWFWMD approval is required prior to issuance of City Building Permit),if applicable $t� ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF STORMWATER PLAN REQUIREMENTS(Applicant must initial one of the following): � Stormwater plan as noted above is included , Stormwater plan is not required and explanation narrative is attached. At a minimum, a grading plan and finished floor elevations shall be provided. CAUTION — IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A STORMWATER PLAN AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED,APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements,contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at(727)562-4750. F. SUPPLEMENTAL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 4-202.A) �`� SIGNED AND SEALED SURVEY(including legal description of property)—One original and 14 copies; �1 TREE SURVEY (including existing trees on site and within 25'of the adjacent site,by species,size(DBH 4"or greater),and location, including drip lines and indicating trees to be removed)—p/ease design around the existing trees; ❑j��TREE INVENTORY; prepared by a "certified arborisY', of all trees 4" DBH or greater, reflecting size, canopy (drip lines) and N/A '� condition of such trees;. � LOCATION MAP OF THE PROPERTY; Z:\Business Docs\11006 RCS Grace House\Pertnitting\completed Flexible Development(FLD)5 2010.docx Page 3 of 7 � ❑��PARKING DEMAND STUDY in conjunction with a request to make deviations to the parking standards (ie. Reduce number of spaces). Prior to the submittal of this application,the methodology of such study shall be approved by the Community Development Coordinator and N/A shall be in accordance with accepted traffic engineering principles. The findings of the study will be used in determining whether or not deviations to the parking standards are approved; � GRADING PLAN,as applicable; ��'PRELIMINARY PLAT,as required(Note: Building permits will not be issued until evidence of recording a final plat is provided); N/A .� � COPY OF RECORDED PLAT,as applicable; G. SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A) SI � PLAN with the following information(not to exceed 24"x 36"): Index sheet referencing individual sheets included in package; North arrow; Engineering bar scale(minimum scale one inch equals 50 feet),and date prepared; 1,� All dimensions; � Footprint and size of all EXISTING buildings and structures; Footprint and size of all PROPOSED buildings and structures; All required setbacks; �All existing and proposed points of access; �II required sight triangles; Identification of environmentally unique areas, such as watercourses, wetlands, tree masses, and specimen trees, including �' description and location of understory,ground cover vegetation and wildlife habitats,etc;Location of all public and private easements; Location of all street rights-of-way within and adjacent to the site; �ocation of existing public and private utilities, including fire hydrants,storm and sanitary sewer lines, manholes and lift stations, gas nd water lines; ✓ All parking spaces,driveways,loading areas and vehicular use areas; � Depiction by shading or crosshatching of all required parking lot interior landscaped areas; Location of all solid waste containers, recycling or trash handling areas and outside mechanical equipment and all required screening tper Section 3-201(D)(i)and Index#701}; �Location of all landscape material; � Location of all onsite and offsite storm-water management facilities; �Location of all outdoor lighting fixtures; Location of all existing and proposed sidewalks;and Floor plan typicals of buildings for all Level Two approvals. A floor plan of each floor is required for any parking garage requiring a . Level Two approval. � ITE DATA TABLE for existing,required,and proposed development,in written/tabular form: EXISTING REQUIRED PROPOSED �Land area in square feet and acres; 43,714 square feet, 1.003535 �cres MOL umber of EXISTING dwelling units; 14 �Number of PROPOSED dwelling units;14 /Gross floor area devoted to each use;2,406sf office,14,103sf �/ apartments,1,OOOsf new lab /Parking spaces: total number, presented in tabular form with the �$ 16 ✓ number of required spaces; �otal paved area, including all paved parking spaces &driveways, xpressed in square feet&percentage of the paved vehicular area; fficial records book and page numbers of all existing utility easement;08840/0923 �Building and structure heights;shown on plans � Impermeable surface ratio(I.S.R.);and 50.44 52.41 � �Fioor area ratio(F.A.R.)for all nonresidential uses. •2499 .2726 �REDUCED COLOR SITE PLAN to scale(8'/:X 11); �(FOR DEVELOPMENTS OVER ONE ACRE,provide the following additional information on site plan: N/A Z:\Business Docs\11006 RCS Grace House\Permitting\completed Flexible Development(FLD)5 2010.docx Page 4 of 7 � • � One-foot contours or spot elevations on site; Offsite elevations if required to evaluate the proposed stormwater management for the parcel; � All open space areas; Location of all earth or water retaining walls and earth berms; Lot lines and building lines(dimensioned); Streets and drives(dimensioned); Building and structural setbacks(dimensioned); p Structural overhangs; H. LANDSCAPING PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-1102.A) � LA�IDSCAPE PLAN with the following information(not to exceed 24"x 36"): '�% All existing and proposed structures; � Names of abutting streets; � Drainage and retention areas including swales,side slopes and bottom elevations; �,� Delineation and dimensions of all required perimeter landscape buffers; Sight visibility triangles; ;� Delineation and dimensions of all parking areas including landscaping islands and curbing; / Existing trees on-site and immediately adjacent to the site,by species,size and locations, including driplines(as indicated on required �/ tree survey); % Location, size, and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, indicated by a key relating to the plant f/ schedule; Plant schedule with a key(symbol or label) indicating the size,description,specifications, quantities, and spacing requirements of all � existing and proposed landscape materials,including botanical and common names; Typical planting details for trees, palms, shrubs and ground cover plants including instructions, soil mixes, backfilling, mulching and protective measures; Interior landscaping areas hatched and/or shaded and labeled and interior landscape coverage, expressing in both square feet and percentage covered; Conditions of a previous development approval(e.g.conditions imposed by the Community Development Board); irrigation notes. �REDUCED COLOR LANDSCAPE PLAN to scale(8'h X 11); .-�,- � COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM application, as applicable. Landscape associated with the Comprehensive Landscape Program shall exceed minimum Code requirements to offset the areas where minimum Code will not be met. I. BUILDING ELEVATION PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A.23) � BUILDING ELEVATION DRAWINGS—with the following information; t� �All sides of all buildings; Dimensioned; ��{Colors(provide one full sized set of colored elevations); W� Materials; 0� REDUCED BUILDING ELEVATIONS—same as above to scale on 8'/2 X 11. � Z:\Business Docs111006 RCS Grace House\Pertnitting\completed Flexible Development(FLD)5 2010.docx Page 5 of 7 , � J. SIGNAGE: (Division 19. SIGNS/Section 3-1806) � All EXISTING freestanding and attached signs; Provide photographs and dimensions (area, height, etc.), indicate whether they will be removed or to remain. � All PROPOSED freestanding and attached signs; Provide details including location, size, height, colors, materials and drawing; freestanding signs shall include the street address(numerals) �f�, Comprehensive Sign Program application,as applicable(separate application and fee required). N/A o[ ��I�Reduced signage proposal(8'/z X 11) (color), if submitting Comprehensive Sign Program application. N/A � K. TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY: (Section 4-202.A.13 and 4-801.C) ��,p( Include if required by the Traffic Operations Manager or his/her designee or if the proposed development: N/A 'F� ■ Will degrade the acceptable level of service for any roadway as adopted in the Comprehensive Plan. ■ Will generate 100 or more new vehicle directional trips per hour and/or 1000 or more new vehicle trips per day. ■ Will affect a nearby roadway segment and/or intersection with five(5)reportable accidents within the prior twelve(12)month period or that is on the City's annual list of most hazardous intersections. Trip generation shall be based on the most recent edition of the Institute of Transportation EngineePs(ITE)Trip General Manual. The Traffic Impact Study must be prepared in accordance with a "Scoping Meeting" held with the Traffic Operations Manager and the Planning DepartmenYs Development Review Manager or their designee(727-562-4750) Refer to Section 4-801 C of the Community Development Code for exceptions to this requirement. �1 Acknowledgement of traffic impact study requirements(Applicant must initial one of the following): Traffic Impact Study is included.The study must include a summary table of pre-and post-development levels of service for all roadway legs and each turning movement at all intersections identified in the Scoping Meeting. ��;j��yC Traffic Impact Study is not required. �— CAUTION- IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at(727) 562- 4750. L. FIRE FLOW CALCULATIONS/WATER STUDY: Provide Fire Flow Calculations.Water Study by a FIRE PROTECTION ENGINEER to assure an adequate water supply is available and to determine if any upgrades are required by the developer due to the impact of this project. The water supply must be able to support the needs of any required fire sprinkler,standpipe and/or fire pump. if a fire pump is required the water suppiy must be able to supply 150%of its rated capacity. Compliance with the 2004 Florida Fire Prevention Code to include NFPA 13,MFPA 14,NFPA 20,NFPA 291,and MFPA 1142(Annex H)is required. � Acknowledgement of fire flow calculations/water study requirements(Applicant must initial one of the following): N/A Fire Flow Calculations/Water Study is included. _� Fire Flow Calculations/Water Study is not required. CAUTION - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A FIRE FLOW CALCULATIONS/ WATER STUDY AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements,contact the City Fire Prevention Department at(727)562-4334. Z:\Business Docs111006 RCS Grace House\Permittinglcompleted Flexible Development(FLD)5 2010.docx Page 6 of 7 M. SIGNATURE: I,the undersigned,acknowledge that all representations made STATE OF FLORIDA,COUNTY OF PINELIJ,�S in this application are true and accurate to the best of my S orn to and s bscribed before me this 12� day of knowledge and authorize City representatives to visit and �g3,t�� ,A.D.20�_to me and/or by photograph the property described in this application. ,who is personally known has produced � as identification. - � Signa �e of p per� owne or resentative Notary pu ic, My commission expires: � G.C.ROBERTS Nofary Public,State of Fbrida My Comm.Expkes Dec.13,2p13 No.Dpg461gq Z:\Business Docs\11006 RCS Grace House\Permittinglcompleled Flexible Development(FLD)5 2010.docx Page 7 of 7 � Planning & Development CASE NUMBER:' � ��r�� Department RECEIVED BY(Staff Initials): j l�,� 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, Florida 33756 DATE RECEIVED: �' Teiephone: 727-562-4567 Fax: 727-562-4865 ❑ SU6MIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICAT]ON Q SUBMIT 14 COPIES OF TFiE ORIGINALAPPLICATION-Plans and appiicakion are required to be collafed,stapled and folded inlo sets �c NOTE: A TOTAL OF 15 SETS OF THIS APPLICATION AND ALL SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION IS REQUIRED TO BE SUBMITTED fN CQNJUNCT[ON WITH A COMPLE7E LEVEL ONE OR LEVEL TWO APPLICATfON. COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRA.M (Revised 11/29l2010} �PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT� APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A) aPPLtcANr HA�ne: Religious Community Services, Inc_ _ _ . __M _ .__. ---�� — -- -- -- - nnai��tv�a,DORESS: 503 South Martin Luther King Jr.Avenue,_Clearwater, FL 33756 PHONE NUMBER: �727 584T3528 __ CELL NUMBE�27�254-7107 _______.____.__.._.. __ ._. �-nnAl�AoDRESS: duggan cooley a�res�inellas:org PROPertN owNFR(s�: Religious Community Services,_Inc._ _ Jy__^ �._,__,_..... Lisl ALL owners on Ihe deed J �� AGENT NAME: _ _Hodge Mana�ement, LLC �u��___,___.,T:.___ MAILING ADDRESS: 8770 S217111101e BOUI@Vafd, Seminole, FL 33772 ----- -__� . .._._- ---------------- ___- ---- PHONENUMBER: _ (813) 507-0506 .._._,.. . ___ FAXNUMBERr (813)_464-7763_________._ _._ _ . .._._ CELL NUMBER: _�,81�507-0507 _ E-MAILADDRESS: HOCI ELLC tam abay,.rr,com ,_�_ ,,,,,___.�_ The landscaping requirements of Article 3, Division 12,may be modified or waived as part of a Level One(F[exible Standard}or Levet Two (Elexible Development) applicafion,as the case may be, if the application for development approval includes a Comprehensive Landscape Program, which satisfies the following criteria. The use of fandscape plans, secfions/elevations, renderings and perspectives may be necessary to supplement the information provided on this worksheet.Landscaping associated with the Comprehensive Landscape Program shall exceed minimum Code requirements Eo affset the areas where minimum Code will not be met. 1. ARCHITECTURAL TtiEME: a. The Iandscaping in a Comprehensive Landscape Program shall be designed as a part of the architectural theme of the principal buildings propased or developed on fhe parcel proposed for the development. OR � ' b. The design, character, location and/or materials oF the Iandscape treatment proposed in the Comprehensive Landscape Program shall be demonstrably more attractive than landscaping oiherwise permitted on ihe parcel proposed for development under the minimum landscape standards. We,plan to provide a variety of tree species in addition to accent trees shrubs qround cover, and turf to enhance the new and existing building envelope, meetinc,�the minimum landsca�e standards. �_______�_ __ Page 1 oF 2 2. �IGHTING: � Any lighting proposed as a part of a comprehensive landscape program is automatically conirolled so that the ]ighting is tumed off when the business is closed. Existing lighting is to remain -general lighting for the new computer lab is anticipated to be turned off when not in use. 3. COMMUNITY CHARACTER: The landscape treatment proQosed in lhe Comprehensive Landscape Program will enhance the community character of lhe City of Clearwaier. We plan to significantly enhance the community character by meeting the requirements of the comprehensive __ landscape program through the use of native vegetation. _y _____.�_ 4. PROPERTY VAl.UES: 7he landscape treatment proposed in lhe Comprehensive Landscape Program wiil have a beneficial impact on the value of ihe property in the immediate vicinity of the parce[proposed for development. New landscaping w'ill provide a beneficial impact on property values through enhancing existing conditions significantly through the addition of shade and accent trees, shrubs, ground cover, and additional turf. 5. SPECIAL AREA OR SCENIC CORRIDOR PLAN: The Iandscape treatrnent proposed in Ehe Comprehensive Landscape Program is consistent wiEh any special area or scenic corridor plan which the City oP Clearwater has prepared and adopted for the area in which the parcel proposed for deve(opment is located. The frontage of the lot will be enhanced alonq Myrtle Avenue to be consistent with the comprehensive landscape �ro�ram. We will provide a 12'wide buffer- 1 tree/35'-100%shrubs(6'within 3 years)and replace existing 3'fence with a new 3'fence for child security. SIGNATURE: I,the undersigned,acknowiedge that all representations made in STATE dF FLORIDA,COUNTY OF PINELLAS �- fhis appfication are true and accurate to the best of my Sw to and subscribed before me this �Z' day of knowledge and authorize Cit}/ representatives to visit and ��✓`�� ,A.D.20 11 to me andlor by photograph fhe property described in this application. �eSSICa o g2 , who is eersonall�known has produced as identificabon. - - — , � �.�_�.�_____.._ Signatur of propert own ,or r res ative Notary pu6lic, � My commission expires: Hod Management, LLC/Jessica Hodge, President Pk�tary Public,State ot Florida My Comm.Expires Dea•13,2013 No.DD946184 S;IPlanning DepartmenflApplication FormslDevefopment Review12010 FormslComprehensive Landscape Program 19.2010.doc Page 2 of 2 N. AFFIDAVIT TO AUTHORIZE AGEMT: i. Provide names of ali property owners on deed—PRINT(uli names: Religious Gommunity Services, Inc. 2. That(I am/we are)the owner{s)and record title holder(s)of the following described property(address or general location): 1552 Sa. Myrtle Avenue, Clearwater, Florida 33756 3. ThaE this property constilutes the property for which a requesl for a:(descr+be request) 1,000 square foot addition(for a computer/storage room)to existing attached dwel{ings 4. That the undersigned(haslhave)appoinfed and(does/do)appoint: Jessica Hodge, Hodge Management, LLC or Gareth Eich, Renker,Eich, Parks Architects as(hisftheir)agent(s)lo execute any peHtions or other documents necessary to affecl such peti6on; 5. That lhis affidavit has been executed to induce the City of Clearwater,Florida to consider and act on the above described property; 6. That site visils to fhe properiy are necessary by City representatives in order to process this application and the owner authorizes City representaUves to visit and pholograph the property described in Ihis application; 7. That(I/we),the undersigned authority,hereby certify that lhe foregoing is true and correct. —��.�.,,�- C�.�. 1�,..�.Q� G Ee 2C5�j,,.c . Pro e Owner Property Owner Property Owner Property Owner STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS �� 8efore me the undersigned,an offlcer duly commissloned by the laws of the State ot Florida,on this 1 i day of �,1i u S 1 , a�1 t personatiy appeared ��e,(1 (u o�`c� who having been first duly swom Deposes and says that he/she fully understands the contents of the affidavit that he/she signed. rw��nuu��uaunu�u�nunu�uu�anu . �AWN OWENS t e �, �uni�p007755�NW � Y � : ��i_1 ; y� � Expires A131Z09.2 _ ti+ , � ��'yy?a�a�� Fbride NdMY�� ' Noiary Public Signature Notary Seav��a�mp.................n....��.�......G -��I a��a My Commission Expires: Z:VBusiness Docs\110D6 RCS Grace HouselPermitingkompleled Flexible Uevetopment(FLO)5 2010.docz Page 8 nf 7 ' ' PO Box 3727 R E S P O N S E S '� � ��L` Seminole,FL 33775 HodgeLLC@tampabay.rr.com lT1Fil'JRGERlEI'7T,u..c CGC1509923 RCS GRACE HOUSE COMPUTER LIBRARY EXPANSION 1552 S. MYRTLE AVEN U E WRITfEN SUBMITTAL: Flexible Development application to permit a 1,000 square foot addition (for a computer/storage room) to existing attached dwellings in the Office (0) District with a lot area of 43,714 square feet, a lot width of 104.07 feet, front (east) setback of 4 feet (to pavement) and 30 feet (to structure) where 25 feet is allowable, a side (south) setback of zero feet (to structure) where 5 feet is allowable, side (north) setback of 10 feet (to pavement) and 12 feet (to structure) where 5 feet is allowable, and a rear (west) setback of 40 feet (to structure) where 10 feet is allowable, a building height of 12.4 feet (to midpoint of pitched roof), and a reduction from eighteen to sixteen parking spaces under the provisions of Community Development Code Section 2-304, as well as a reduction to the front perimeter buffer from 15 feet to 4 feet and side perimeter buffer from 10 feet to zero feet as a Comprehensive Landscape Program under provisions of Community Development Code Section 3-1202.G., and a request of Termination of Status as a Nonconformity under the provisions of Community Development Code Section 6-109. PARKING EXPLANATION: RCS Grace House is a program of Religious Community Services, Inc. which concentrates its efforts on assisting families in returning to permanent housing. As a result of family economic trauma, most families have sold valuable possessions including vehicles. RCS Grace House provides transportation using a program van as well as providing participants with bus passes. As a result, there are typically 5 to 6 cars maximum occupying the parking lot. This information has been verified by the program director and results from approximately 5 years of observation and experience. STORMWATER NARRATIVE: Existing stormwater system to remain except for relocating existing underground pipe due to footing conflicts. Existing impervious parking spaces are being removed at high end of parking lot. No changes to existing site sheet flow. � . : � � �. � �•� • •• :. � � � - . - ,..- , ..,. , - - �.. . . • • • . . � . � . • . • � _�___," � "P-` t,,, `�"��,..•,-. � �.��'� H�'"Mj„ � �� k � s� a d�:--�-_-�-�';' �„' '' ��„ f -r�°,�� '�s `--�--; ,� , r' '�_ S5}5}�r° a' •_-_�_.. G � #�P� Y� �� .;� 1�}! �d �' y �e,r,1� 5.��;! r } y^ � �,. { ,� . '1j �.V^ R 3 8 y �.. '.D� �, I AA`� � :°,�+ .�'""`�, ,�'1 i _ � � � ` �,,..� � .f � +— � '.. .�� ''�w�4 � .'s 'tj.� $,4 7°',^.+s"I , ��.�4.��? ':`m°'•.�. .s += � � �-�.'� G . �r � x� � ..,r < ��. ._,... ..� �,; ��,,.. . p ..� �}��i �g .� �--,-:.._�,,,,,-' . "j�'�- y� 1�,.x:F�! �"'• [""_"'__'¢..'�.� � g �� 1 r �#� �&�..•'+�.+»..t ��'"•� � � '!E':��, �#:.�,��. 4� � , �. � � � ' ro'+s�� P ..�'°f� '�� '. � Y�� y� { �`' +"# .�J�-. �.�� * � �0 � E A r T ��' . r�-�� F 6 1 �, `� �Y��',�. x..Y 4� � f➢ . � M r n i � � � �. . c p �s'�"`� �x, :.fia�'� � "t,_.�.' � �;''� � a +t � , � ' � � 1� �� M��JV � ` � �E��" �` r+�:, �k '-�;�d a :°i��, & �»:..t"'r � � �.,p ` � ,;p•� a_. � � � a�..:� ' � ,� x '�+ e G �2.�� ,} �� (� � ��• 'J�l�...�� f i S `. , S� z �,, �i� .�-�x�� ''��„' '� u � 'R'• '�� r r ,� '�� `.� t �.; � :K _ �... .-�-,, � �` , <, ,a �.� , ... . � ..._ ....< , ... ' a �. .�p'�'�`,k �, ..,.,� . r� `�4 • � • � � � � �.y£i "�/yC� '� � :. g �'� .w� � �� ' ,"�� f0�1,�.i c��—�v�� y?� � �:� �k�.' � _ _ ; —.,. } � � t 5 t " i f �' ' � � � �r� "'� 9 �� . �l'R w,� , ..:'_ ;�� TM..:y,.:x .�J'.:..,'" -a.4 .�� '� "y�;..,�.:. y�:'; � , 't; S .. . �,..�a� . . ,��',�,.�" �� , �.. � ,�� `� � -� � ` � 9° �� 7��.d�� t ,�� >� �� '�� ea �k�� R � .. 3Yi ,,� �'� �^Y �." �' �''\ �#��.�.�� ''� ; � �;J 4� ,:' . ��c "�'� . ,�„�o �: � ,' ,. {, . F� �'it � �'�' r---�r�µ---e�- :�l� '�� '' f,�t��` � �; ��is�"�e maa: , � l.. ti .`t �^s �,,;.�ti "` _ �� 5 � � r�s"j Asrl^'a:• '� R�' '"'�::h� "' >�j�'Y:�� € �T � 4a�,�'�� x.„, ^±+ ,� ;� ,�� 4� �;�`.�� [ ,�, . 'ri�' ry; ,*s+'b '� _' -.^_.--t r, s:V� ��w, � F . � W ,a ��```'; y` . . ..�1�'�' � '�1� ,T s ;� ti��; :'�, {9 f 1�� f �„y �ry �•q� ��'4� .ro _ r 'F T�' Y." l+. i '� � py ' � ''�'3�'�l� C,' 7 4r' ti` ,. a l.�x � ��' � �. �:i � g �� r a . .: � �. a . . � , � ` __ � �:! ys.�k�-� �� 5 9 {� : i'#fi:�� t � y�r-ty a . '� . , � � " �, y �� .� +'� ,f� � x �� .: � k +;��p .S i � ��,( �..�,. � � , . t� � iA r j � S`tr.. FC I 'f 7 ° ° � ��, ��1 I �; c wr t .° �S�. `� � � � �� " � � � �� { p� a.3 � � '.� "� � a' ;w��'t $�� e t � o �i�, � 3 : G� ; �I'�!�,. r �r' � .". � � i F _ d� � R ,Y' � f,��. �� R �Y.OiM i .. t ` � � �� T� Sti-�� ,._..� q � 1 _ 'Y-:'_'I32:wn+' � wt�.y 95n �..��+�+Mv w��+4 . ... ,,. .n.n . _ ,, . .v - _ " ' . _ _ ,..:.. t,. . +r�7w.�/�.. �f' � id.�.�.`��.'�f....`�Gr��,�.' �r��`�'s11�. { ,,.., ��e; ��. �� ...� �_� • ..� . . ,::.. . �:, .. a:�,�+� �.�; ,r u;: . .�: ..� N , .r;i . � � � � .Phone: �813)�D�-05D6 FAX: �813)4647763 _ � � r � . �� r �a1R 11Y� • �-- O � - �� v � �� ' R � m I/s��r p � � � VG F ± � � � � �n p � I:al � M � � � � � T a � o N „uu m � o� '�� a "'' F _ �� q� � � � F °' � F �p�� D ' e "p � �E � �� 0 q,., y ! �p�4 � �8 � � � � � g 4 �x , 1 a ' ' � `J � � � � � q, i R "�3Y� „ � a� • �� + e" �¢ a � � � � �� a . � � p �.- p � g � .. � �$ �� 1 k- ' . �� . _.._.._xA � — �--� i L.�• � ��'� �..,��. �'s � $ x ( �—�= x �; � �� 4 � � ' � � � � �� .8 � � .—. �I ' x� r l ¢;� .,. .. ��x � oT � � �� '' y � �� , �� . , � � � � �� A i _ n it � � C�P � � �� M . � � � ��( � s �� ( �� i � ��. ; -- ��- - i�i� -�- I � � ._.�... . � � r° � °°"'� �� p � f ,uf wr � �� 1 �---�� g ";�t�� o� � 1 �., �,,, , � ( ' ��t � rv ,� � . �� , s � � � Lx _ � — � YlRIIL Alp+[ fW�� I�iir� , �� _ � � _a �. A � ' � �' '!552 S MYRTLE AVE � Z �� • BCP2004-09�27 �� GRACE HOUSE 2arnrtg O �allasi!9138 2 �+1 � "T „ Y' ''�1 � f��A�� E�`/ FsSSE3�9aC=� � .�� } �� t�tit.H x� ..�. �� q��`€� � �X= ��`��" � a� �� s � � � � �� f�$� � � � �i 3 �i 3� �� i`` ��l�3� � � ��I��r��t# r�� f�� ,��,� � � i ��;►•�y�� j� �j ��t� 5� � ��, �'�� .. � qrtl � :s r_ ri :l�a.�l 6 c�xgo _eA,.ka . . :� � Cor orate Warrant Deed INST # 9q-314191 'r � � P y NOV 15, 1994 S;pgpM This Indenture, made [his 15th day of November pINELLAS COIINTY FLA. A.D.19 94 , Between OFF.,REC.$K 8BA0 PG 923 Ieaiah'a Inn, Inc., a Florida Corporation, not for profit whose pos[office address is: •� � � � � � � � � a corporation existing under the laws of the �`_ �' ` _ i . Statc of Elorida ,Grantor anA - '' � ,� '. �� . Religious Community Services, Inc., a � �-� � � > Florida Non-Profit Corporation ,'� i � 3C035131 COB 11-15-144� 16t59:�5 � � Ol UE6-ISAIpHS IHC ��.��.' whose ost office addmss is: RECORDIN6 1 f6.60 -= �� P DOC STAlIP-DRZ19 3 f504.60 ' , . . 1855 South Highland Ave. ;�� `��; T9Ti1l: �510.00 � � Cieazwater� F��4616 CHECK AIST.TE}OERED: f510.OD � I � , Grantees CH8A6Es f.00 � � � 1 REC Rll1Na Grantee. --. �. � ,' � C i� "� � - i i g .�O .� ��'� - � ,� WitnPSSeth, that the said Grantor, for and in consideration of the sam of( Ten & NOf]�00 `� � 5 Dollars,co is in liand paid by the said Grantee, the receipt whereof is hereby acknowledgcd,ht�s granced,�argained anct � sold to[he said Grantee forever,[he fallowing desccibed land,situate, lying and 6eing in the County of`� � _, � ' /c Pinella6 , Scate of Florida,to wit: -- � From the SE corner of the SE 1/4 of Section 2I, Townahip 29 S, ` Range iS E, run tSence N 0° 20' 51" E, along the deotioa line, 'raLS/0•Ot�- 556.80 feet for the Poiat o� Seginniag; thence N S�C �5' 09".W, 450.0 feet, thence N 0° 20' 51" E, 100.0 feet;,,thenae.5�89°��5a1.' 25" E� 113.75 feet� thence N 25° 13� 42" E� 3��$@et��t1leIIfie S 89° 12' 20" E, 334.84 feet to the aeetion line;\£herica S��d° 20' � � 51° W, along the aec�ion Zine, 103.97 fee�� to ��.�63nt:o£ x = Beginning. Lesa arid except the East 30.d�fret foz' road right of o` � " wap. --. �� ` �� = .' -�� ` �. � � J C � /� \ �� ,J c y � � .�` �`) �c� i i � � y _ — � � 1 I � � r � 1 � � U Subject to coveaaats, restrictimir� a{2�eas�xnente of recosd. Subject x 4 also to taxes for I995 aad�equ�gt��rea�s: '� Parael Identificatioa er: 81/�29/15/00000/�40/2500 � LL And the said Grnntor does here6y fut(y warryr[i�the ticiF tb�said land,nnd will defead[he same against the lawful � m claims of alI persons whomsocver. ,. � `„' � o � In Witness V4'hereaf, U�said GrahEof has caused this instrument to be ezecuted in its name by its duly � 'T i authoriud officer and caused irs cofgerate sfal ta bp�fixed[he day and yeaz Prst ubove written. ; � � ,' � � Isaiah's Inn, Tnc., a Florida � ., `� ��,' Corporatioa, aot for profit . . -- . . .' -- '. . . � �. .� � � � � � . . � � � � .. '"� � ,.� Signed and Sealed a�O�ar Pres�nte: By: <;`� `� �� ; Robert E. Crown .--�'� � ' lts President �?��-� r,�:p�%g-sou.thw�.��C � T `` � �VY )l/�Wl Q�O�a�[0�� !C N•"�:I�7.�3 CI]$Qldt GS�% � � �� ) � \ � �`SSate of `, � Florida �olu�ry of � ; Pinellas . � ' . The fbre�ng instrument was acknowledged bcfore me this 15th day of November . 19 94 .6Y RoberC E. Crown � of Isaiah's Ian, Inc., a Florida Corporation, not £or profit a corporation exisdng under the laws of the State aF Florida ,on behalf of the corporation. Hc/She is personally known to me or has produced driver's license as identificution. .�ItEPARED BY:Melisn Schmidt �Y/!•ZGG L��.i.t/zt-� RECORD&RETURN TO: Princ Nam�: �� Century Tittc and Ahstract,inc. NoWry Puhlic �� My Commission Expircs: .,� � OALS E.SOUTN1lVICIC 325 IIc�cher Road North ta�y u '�"�F 5/43 Clclnvatcr,Fioridn 34625 Cilc Pfo:30,493 9 �, MY��^•��g��'�� • • Corporate Wa�-ranty Deed Tl�is iudcuturc, made this 15th day oC Noveml�er A:D.14 94 , Bctwecn Ieaiah's Inn, Ina., a P'lorida Corporation, not for profit , wl�osc post offce address is: a corporation ezisling undcr the laws of the State of rlorida ,Granlor and Religioua Community Servicea, Inc., a Florida Non-Pro£it Corporation �vhose post o(fice address is: Granteea' SSN: , Gcantee, WitnCSSCIII, thal Qie said Crantor, for and in consideration of the sum of( Ten & NO/100 ) Dollars, to ir in lrmd paiJ by the said Grv�tee, pie reccipt wlieroof is hereby acknowSeJged,has granted, bargained and sold to t6c said Grantee Forevcr,Uie following descriUed land,siluate, lying and Ueing in the Covnty of Pinellas , State of Florida,to wit: From the SE corner of the SE 1/4 of 5ection 21, Towaahip 29 S, Range 15 E, run thence N 0° 20' 51'" E, along the section 1ine, 556.80 feet for the Point of Begianing; thence N B9° 15' 09" W, 450.0 feet, thence N 0° 20' S1° E, 100.0 feer; thence 5 89° 5i' 25" E, 113.75 feet; thence N 25° 13' 42" E, 3.35 feetf thence S 8g° 12' 20" E, 334.fl4 feet to the aection line; thence S 0° 20' 51" W, along the seation line, 1U3.97 feet to the Point of Beginning. Lesa and except the -East 30.0 feet for road right of way. Subject to covenants, reatrictiona and eaeements of record. Subject also to taxes foz 1995 and aubaequent yease. Parcel Tdentification Nvmber: 2i/29/15/00000/440/250o A�►d Aie said Grantor does hereUy fu[lywarrant the tide to said land,and wilIdefend the same against thc lawful claims of ail persons whomsocvcr. In WitneSS W1leCeoP, the sald Grantor has caused this instrumenl to Ue executed in its name by its duly authorizecl oCFcer and caused its corporate seal to be.afFued ieaiahd�yc=�%a=nvewritta Florida Corporation, not for protit Signed and Sealed in Our Presence: BY� r=`L� �� Rabert E. Crown � ' 1ts President �/ .1�.� w^K:pale'L�`. Soutl�wick ��u�- (Corporate Seal) �^�Melisa Schmi.dt State of Florida Counly of Pinellas The foregoing instnunent was acknowledged before me lhis 15t1'i day of November � t� 94 'by Robert E. Crown o[ Teaiah's Inn. Ine•. a Flor�da Corporation, nct £or profit ,on bchalf of the con�oration. a corparation existing under the laws of the Statc of E'lorida as identification. HelSlie is persanally known to me or hu produced driver s 7.ieenee PR�PAR�D 13Y:Mcliss►Schmidt K-'�U ��'tn��'— R�CORD&R�7TJRN TO: Print Name. Century Tillc and Abstract,Inc. Noiary Pubiic CWD-1 325 Iie[chcr Road Noril� My Commission Sspircs: . OALE E SOU7HN+BCK 9 ��°�m,E�e�s Se�t 2P 6.�140 5/9� Clcanvatcr,I'torida 34G25 I�i[c No:30,493 .,,, ��Ct3et�2 � � ftNUm to:(entlasn sclf�addressed stamped envelope) � " Name: 1 st Place Titl2 Addmsr. b22 6ypass Da,Suito 101 . CLEARLVATER,floriJa 34G24 This Instmmnnt Prepared by: nam�ss: William Rambaum,P.A. 622�ypass Drive,Suite 101 � Clearvvster,FL 34G24 ��o{.erty App�a�srr:Paicai latetilicebon GFoI'w�N�nnbcr�s�.11�79.15.00OOO�i10�1GU0 �ran[eelsl�5.�isl kam ReLgmux('onunun:ry$mr�fYs ;,ranlYrfsl�=wlslc . w�„r SFACE A90VE TH�S LINE FOR FAOCESSING PATA SFACE ABOVE THIS IINE FOIf f1E[�AOWG PATA V�JA,�1�..�1�T� I)EED c s�rn�ru•roizY POIZM-ti]iCl'lON 6R�).U2. F.ti.) �I'his Indenture, madc tl�ic 15th day oC Novetnber 1994,I3ChVCBiI John H.Meek,Jr.,a marriec!man,o! thc County oi PineUas , Statc uf Florida . �;ramor', anJ Religious Community Services, Ine., a Not-For-Prcfit corporation,wlinsc�x,st aifi�c adJress is 1558 Myrtle Avenue South,Clearwater,FL e�f ihe Qnmry of Pinellas.Sl.,ic n!Florida ,grant�c•, and Witnesseth d�a[said grant�u. fnr vnd in contiJcrSliun uf thr smn oC'frn ................................._..................... 1)ullars.and o�hrr�oocl amd v�luahlc cunsidcr�tiun t��suid grnntor in 1�anJ paid hy sv�l grantrc.Qir reccipl whcrcof is hcrchy arknnwlrJ,rd.hst gr•rntrd and xold to tli�said gran�ec,mid grantre'x hcirs nnd assigac Cnrcvcr.lhr(ullowing descrihrd land. situatc.lying anJ lxing in Pincllas County. l�lnrid�.to-W�it: I3rgin:d tl�c Suuthcasl tnrncr of Scctic�n Zl,Townsl�ip 2�)South, R.mgc IS East, :md run Nurt6 27G.ti fcet.Wcrl 3i10.0 fcct in Uie poinl of heginning;tlicncc run NorU�2KU.0 1cct; Ee�sl 3(1O.0 1'ect.Soutli 60.(? 1'cct, �'Vc�t 310.0 fcct,South 220.0 lccl, Wcst)6.0 fccl ln tlu point ol'hcginning;lcsti road righl-of-w�iy and less thr Sciuth 220.0 1'ect ihcreuf, Pincllns County, rlorida. "Ilu Grantc,r ccrliGc�thaL this property is not thc residcncc af thc Gramtor or nny mcmhcr<�f thc Grantorti huuu�hold. and said gramcv d�xs hrrcby tully warranl thr tiQc tn s7id land. aad will defcnJ tl�c samc agninst Uu lawtul c(aims nf all jxrsons wLcnnsnc�cr. `"Grnntc+r" �nd "grantec" arc u�cd Cur sin�:ulat or plur•rl, ae contcxl rcquires. In Witness Whereof� �rantur I�nz lurcunlu ul grunlor:s ImnJ�nd xrol tha day un�l yc7r first ulwvc wriltcn. Si�;n�'d cc•rlc�!nn.l Jdi�•rrrd in nttt preSCticr. C�._c iC V.i_r_..-�.�. � /�1 N'imµ,tiigm�iRr �'u[_L. .� itf.�-�JF..L � Ci�un�or gnewrc N+l�tiam' mbaum John Meek Jr. __,_ PnY � /�, . � � Primc.n:une `l-C:',�• i-1� � - �-�'7. '148 Viewto�Dnve Ctearvater FL ___ \l'im...Sipn:ny� �� r I _I'vx�Otlirc A.WnY� DeLynn Yerkey ' ' r��m�e n:��,� • S7'ATL• OP FLORID�1 COUNTY OP PINELLAS llir I'orc,srnng in�trumcn� w:�c arknci�vlcd�cJ Ix•furc�nc this 15th day of November, 1994,hy John H.PJleek, Jr.,a married man,.�vh�,is Ixrsnn�Ay known in mc ur�iiw li:�a pnxluccd:�Driver's License ac identil7cation nnd diJ takc an��:nA. NQ7'AItY PU131.IC': �4�C' ��.3'1�.. JOEI A.WEAVER �t l kOS3ry P1141it�Sla�e 01 Flo�tda mt ame: am am eum S'`�� ` ��A`,�'y s�� MX comm.ezpires AD�•29,1997 My Cammission I`sxpirrs: COl�rtl.No.CC281751 ti1�lc uf 1•lnrida m t.atgc (seal) . • {American Land Title Association Commitment—1966 Rev.] COMMITMENT �ttorneys' 'T�.�le In��rance Fund, Inic. ORLANDO, FLO.RIDA Commifinent To Insure Tifile ATTORNEYS'TTTLE INSUR.ANCE FUND,INC.,a Florida corparation,herein called The Fund, for a valuable consideration,hereby commits to issue its policy or policies of title insurance,as identified in Schedule A, in favor of the proposed Inswred named in Schedule A,as owner or mortgagee af the estate or interest covered hereby in the land described or referzed to in Schedule A; subject to the provisions of Schedules A and B and to the Conditians and Stipulatians hereof. This Commitment shall be effective only when the identity of the proposed Insured and the amount of the poiicy or policies committed#or have been inserted in Schedule A hereof by The � Fund, either aE the time of the issuance of this Commitment or by subsequent endorsement. This Commztment is preliminary Eo the issuance of such policy ar policies of title insurance and a11 liability and obligations hereunder shall cease and terminate six months after the effective date hereof or when the policy or policies committed for shall issue, whichever first occurs, provided that the failure to issue such policy or policies is not the fault of The Fund. ; . In Wttness Whereof, ATTORNEYS'TiTLE INSURANCE FUND, INC. has caused this Commit- ment to be signed and sealed as of the effective date of Comzzutment shown.in Schedule A,the f � Commitment to become valid when countersigned by an authorized signatory. � . , 1 t ''. � ,, .�..:. F ' '-�. ' i � f ' ��„ 1 � M ;�°��NSU�, I . � ; �;��„�o,a,, ��'- Attomeys'Tide Insurance Fund,Inc. f' � a�u: o r�, '-.zy i � � :°`• S��t�.., ��' By `C��iG�,�$rQ.� : . �.�� T ; =;�, .:�,�. ' ; .... � � � ��4., '�oRro�,..�''° Charles J.Kavaleski • . �nuwinn�u�" i � PrEBi[tertt � � . ; � - � ` SERIAL � Y' . + F � . i ` 'c" �.0�a3041 � . ; . ;�_ ___.___ __.__�_---- --.-___ .._ - ---- -_._.___ .__----- - ._____.__ . ____. __�__._� . . . . , � . . . . . . . �. . ,� .- . . . . _, ... ..; . �_.... �..:_.... . _ �,. ._ : . : .: � �� . . . ' COMMiTMENT � " to INS URE TITLE .�t�rllC'y�� Ti�le�surance Fund, In�. ORLANDO,FLORIDA Offices at 5955 T.G.Lee 8oulevard Orlando,Florida 32822 Standard Exceptions 'I`he owner policy will be subject to the mortgage,if any,noted under item two of Section I of Schedule B hereo£All policies will be subject to the following excepEions:(1)taxes foz the yeaz of the effective date of this Commitment and taxes or special assessments which are not shown as existing liens by the public records; (2) rights or claims of parties in possession not shown by the public records; (3) encroachments,overlaps,boundary line disputes,and any other matters which would be disclosed by an accurate surveq and inspection of the premises;(4)easements,or claims of easements,not shown by the public records; (5)any lien,or right to a lien,for services,labor,or material heretofore or hereafter furnished,imposed by law and not shown by the public records. Conditions and Stipulat�ons 1. The term "mortgage;'when used herein, shall include deed of trust, trust deed,or other security instrument. 2. If the proposed Insured has or acquires actual knowledge of any defect,lien,encumbrance,adverse claim or other matter affecting the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment other than those shown in Schednle B hereo�and shall fail to disclose such knowledge to The Fund in writing, The Pund shall be relieved from liability for any loss or damage resulting from anq act of reliance hereon to the extent The Fund is prejudiced by faiiure to so disclose such knowledge. If the proposed Insured shall disclose such knowledge to The Fund, or if The Fund otherwise acquires actual knowledge of any such defect,lien,encumhrance,adverse claim or ather matter,The Fund at its option may amend Schedule B of this Commitnnent accordingly, but such amendment shall not reIieve The Fund from liability previousIy incurred pursuant to paragraph 3 of these Conditions and Stipulations. .f 3. T:.iability of The Fund under this Commitment shall be only to the named proposed Tnsured and such parties included under the definition af Insured in the form of policy or policies committed for and only for actual loss incuzred in zeliance hereon in undertaking in good#aith(a)to comply with the requirements hereo� or(b) to eliminate exceptions shown in Schedule B, or (c)to acquire or create the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment.Xn no event shall such liabili#y exceed the amo�nt stated in 5chedule A for the policy or policies committed for and such liability is subjece to the insuring provisions,the Exclusions from Coverage and the Conditions and Stipulations of the forrn of policy or policies committeci for in favor of the proposed Insured which are hereby incorporated by reference and aze made a part of this Cammitzn.ent except as expressly modified herein. 4. Any action or actions vr rights of action that the proposed Insured may have or may bring against The Fund arising out of the status of the tiEle to the estate or interest or the status of the mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment must be based on and aze subject to the provisions of this Commitment. _ FUND COMMITMENT FORM SCHEDULE A Commitment No: C-2053041 Effective Date; U9/29/94 Member's File Reference: 11:OU pm meek-2 1. Policy or Policies or Guarantee to be issued: Proposed Amounl of Insurance OWNER'S: $ 28,00�.00 Proposed Insured: Religious Community Services MOTtTGAGEE: $ Proposed Insured: 2. The estate or interest in the land described ot referred to in lhis commitment is a fee simpte(if other, specify same) and title thareto is at the effective date heceof vested in: John H. Meek,Jr., a married man, pursuant to that Quit Claim Deed recorded April 26, 1983 at �.R. Book 8249, Page 1623, Pub(ic Records of Pinelfas County, Florida. 3. The land referred to in 4his commitment is described as foIlows: Begin at the Sautheast comer of Section 21,Township 24 South,Range 15 East, and run North 276,8 feet, West 3d0.0 feet to the point of beginning;thence run Narth 280.0 feet; East 300.0 feet, South 60.0 feet, West 210.0 feet, South 220.0 feet, West 90.0 feet to the point of beginning; less road right-of-way and less the South 220.0 feet thereof, Pinellas County, Florida. ISSUED BY: ��7- �I�� William Rambaum, P.A. 6842 � � � (Attomey or Firm of Attomeys) AGENT NO. TORNEY-AGENT'S S3GNATURE 622 Bvaass Drive, Suite 901 CEearwater , Florida 34624 PAGE 1 �F 3 (Mailing Address) (City} (Z�Qi �J�'' FUNI� CONIMITMENT FORM SCHEDULE B Cammitment No: C-2a53041 I. The following requirements are to be complied with: 1.Payment of the full consideration to, or for the accounl of, the grantors nr morigagors. 2. Inslruments creating lhe estate or interest to be insured which musl be executed,delivered and Fled for record. a. Warranty Deed from John H. Meek, Jr. and spouse to Religious Community 5ervices, Inc. (Nate: Spouse may not be required to sign Warranty Deed if not homestead of grantor.} b. Grant fzom City of Clearwater, Florida to Religious Community Services, Inc. c. Satisfaction of Mortgage from John H. Meek, 3r. to Barnett Bank of Piaellas County, Florida recorded at O.R. Book 8036, Page 1578, Public Records of PinelIas County, Florida. d. Proper documentation atEestzng to good standing of Religious Community Services, Inc. under laws of State of Florida and ResoIution of same to purchase said property from John H. Meek, Jr. See Attached Confinuafion Sheet II. Schedale B of the policy or policies or guarantee to be issued will contain excepuons to ihe following matters uniess the same are disposed of to the satisfaction of the PUND. 1. Defects, liens, encumbrances,adverse claims or othe�matters,if any,created, first appearing in the public records or attaching subsequent to ihe effecdve date hereof but prior to the date the praposed Insured acquires for value of record the eslate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this commitment. 2. Any ownerpolicy or owner guatan[ee issued putsuant hereto wiU contain under Schedule B the standard exceptionssel forth at ihe inside cover hereof.A.ny mortgage po[icy will contain under Schedule B the slandard excepGons unless an a�idavit of possession and a satisfactory currenl survey are submilled, and inspection of the premises is made,it is determined the cunent year's laxes or specia]assessments have been paid, and it is determined there is nothing of record which would giva rise to mechanics'liens which couId lake priority over the mortgage{where the liens would otherwise take priority, submission of waivers is necessary). 3. Any owner policy issued pursuant hereto will contain under Schedule B the following exception: Any adverse awnership claim by the State of Florida by right of sovereignty to any portion of the lands insureci hereunder, including submerged, �lled and artificially exposed lands, and lands accreted to such lands. 4. Tnterests of City of Clearwater, Florida in that Agreement for Covenants Running with the Land, dated February I2, 1992 and recorded March 17, 1992 at O.R. Book 7845, Page 18$2, Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida. S. Taxes for the year 1993 in the grass amount of$b23.50 were paid on March 11, 1994. The property is assessed at $27,b00.00 and did not receive a $25,000.00 homestead exemption. Tax Polio #21-29-15-00000-440-2600. }�A�OF 3 _ _ _ CGNTIN�JATION SHEET (ScheduIe Continued} Commitment ar Policy No: C-2053041 Continuaiion of Fund Commitment Form, Schedule B, Sectian I e. Proper compliance with all requirements of Commercial Contract and Addendum to Contract. f. Purchase of adjacent property as set forth and required in Addendum No. 2 to Contract. P,�E 3 OF 3 �r� ��c✓� RENKER• EICH� PARKS ARCHITECTS August 4th, 2011 August 15th, 2011 —REVISED City of Clearwater Planning and Development Department Municipal Services Building, 100 South Myrtle Avenue, Clearwater, Florida 33756 RE: Religious Community Services Inc. City Case Number. FLD2011-07025— 1552 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE REPA Project # 1103 1552 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE CLEARWATER, Florida- 33756 Owner/Applicant/ Representative : Religious Community Services Inc. 503 South MLK JR AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FL, 33756 PHONE: 727 584 3528, FAX: 727 587 7747 Dear Sir or Madame: The following are the responses to the DRC review comments (DATED AUGUST 1 ST, 2011) of the Documents for the aforementioned project. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW RESPONSE: - ASBESTOS SURVEY TO BE COMPLETED BY OTHERS. FIRE REVIEW FR QUESTION#1 /RESPONSE: - DO NOT AGREE-PER NFPA-101 2006 TABLE 6.1.14.4.1 REQUIRED SEPARATION OF OCCUPANCIES FROM STORAGE TO A BUSINESS-EXCEPTION-2 HOUR RATING MAY BE REDUCED BY ONE HOUR IF AN APPROVED AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER SYSTEM IS INSTALLED. EXISTING WALL DIRECTLY ADJACENT TO NEW CONSTRUCTION IS 1 HR/CMU-SEE ATTACHED. RESPONSE APPROVED BY DRC @ 8/4/2011 MEETING FR QUESTION#2/RESPONSE: - WE WILL COMPLY& INSTALL SIGNAGE @ ENTRY DOORS TO COMPLY WITH FAC 69A60 FFP CODE. SHOWING ROOF OF BUILDING HAS BEEN CONSTRUCTED WITH LIGHTWEIGHT TRUSS SYSTEM. RESPONSE APPROVED BY DRC @ 8/4/2011 MEETING FR QUESTION#3/RESPONSE: - DO NOT AGREE-PER NFPA-101 2006 TABLE 6.1.14.4.1 REQUIRED SEPARATION OF OCCUPANCIES FROM STORAGE TO A BUSINESS-EXCEPTION-2 HOUR RATING MAY BE REDUCED BY ONE HOUR IF AN APPROVED AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER SYSTEM IS INSTALLED. EXISTING WALL DIRECTLY ADJACENT TO NEW CONSTRUCTION IS 1 HR/CMU-SEE ATTACHED. RESPONSE APPROVED BY DRC @ 8/4/2011 MEETING 1609 Dr.M.L.King Jr.Street North,St.Petersburg,Florida 33704-4203 Telephone(727)821-2986 FAX(727)896-4911 Lic.AC001447 FR QUESTION#4/RESPONSE: - WE HAVE VERIFIED AND SHOWN THE LOCATION OF THE FIRE HYDRANT WHICH IS WITHIN 300' OF BUILDING-SEE ATTACHED RESPONSE APPROVED BY DRC @ 8/4/2011 MEETING FR QUESTION#5/ADDED @ 8/04/2011 MEETING SHOW EXISTING FIRE DEPARTMENT STANDPIPE CONNECTION/RESPONSE: - SEE DRAWING AS1.00 FOR LOCATION OF EXISTING STANDPIPE CONNECTION. LAND RESOURCE REVIEW LRR QUESTION#1 /RESPONSE: - ACTUAL CANOPIES OF ALL TREES TO REMAIN HAVE BEEN SHOWN ON PLAN SHEETS USING THE 1 FOOT RADIUS FOR EACH INCH OF DBH -SEE ATTACHED. RESPONSE APPROVED BY DRC @ 8/4/2011 MEETING LRR QUESTION#2/RESPONSE: - WE WILL USE CODE SECTION 3-1404 E AND REMOVE NEW PROPOSED PARKING STALLS FROM OUR PLANS TO ACCOMMODATE EXISTING 50°DBH OAK TREE-SEE ATTACHED RESPONSE APPROVED BY DRC @ 8/4/2011 MEETING LRR QUESTION#3/RESPONSE: - RESPONSE BY OTHERS-IT WILL BE THE INTENT OF THE CONTRACTOR TO HAND DIG AND TUNNEL UNDER ROOTS OF TREES TO BE PRESERVED AND/OR ALL TRENCHES TO RUN RADIAL TO THE TREE. RESPONSE APPROVED BY DRC @ 8/4/2011 MEETING LRR QUESTION#4/RESPONSE: - TREE PRESERVATION PLAN PREPARED BY A CERTIFIED ARBORIST IS BY OTHERS. PLANNING REVIEW PR QUESTION#1 /RESPONSE: - NO EXISTING SIGNS ON THE PROPERTY. RESPONSE APPROVED BY DRC @ 8/4/2011 MEETING PR QUESTION#2/RESPONSE: - SQUARE FOOTAGE OF THE VEHICLE USE AREA IS 7,065 SQ-FT WHICH IS GREATER THAN 4,000 SQ-FT. WE ARE PROPOSING TO CONVERT 398 SQ-FT OR 5.7% OF THE PROPOSED VUA TO PARKING LOT INTERIOR LANDSCAPING AREAS. RESPONSE APPROVED BY DRC @ 8/4/2011 MEETING PR QUESTION#3/RESPONSE: - WE ARE PROPOSING TO CONVERT 398 SQ-FT OR 5.7%OF THE PROPOSED VUA TO PARKING LOT INTERIOR LANDSCAPING AREAS THIS IS LESS THAN THE REQUIRED 10%AND WOULD LIKE TO INCLUDE THIS AMOUNT WITHIN A REDUCTION REQUEST AS A PART OF THE COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PLAN SEE ATTACHED SITE LANDSCAPE PLAN. RESPONSE APPROVED BY DRC @ 8/4/2011 MEETING PR QUESTION#4 I RESPONSE: - PARKING LOT INTERIOR LANDSCAPING AREAS ARE DEPICTED WITH A GROUND COVER HATCH PATTERN-SEE ATTACHED SITE LANDSCAPE PLAN. RESPONSE APPROVED BY DRC @ 8/4/2011 MEETING 2 PR QUESTION#5/RESPONSE: - EXISTING IMPERVIOUS SURFACE RATIO-50.71% PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS SURFACE RATIO-51.85% EXISTING FLOOR AREA RATIO-0.2499 PROPOSED FLOOR AREA RATIO-0.2726 ARE PROVIDED ON SITE LANDSCAPE PLAN-SEE ATTACHED. RESPONSE APPROVED BY DRC @ 8/4/2011 MEETING PR QUESTION#6/RESPONSE: - DIMENSIONS OF PROPOSED ADDTION AND ITS SETBACKS FROM THE NORTHERN PROPERTY LINE ARE PROVIDED ON THE SITE LANDSCAPE PLAN-SEE ATTACHED RESPONSE APPROVED BY DRC @ 8/4/2011 MEETING PR QUESTION#7/RESPONSE: - EXISTING PARKING SPACES ARE DIMENSIONED TO VERIFY COMPLIANCE W/CDC SECTION 3- 1402 SEE ATfACHED SITE LANDSCAPE PLAN. RESPONSE APPROVED BY DRC @ 8/4/2011 MEETING PR QUESTION#8/RESPONSE: - SURVEY IS OUTLINING THE EXISTING CONDITION-SITE PLAN IS PROPOSED SCOPE OF WORK- SEE ATTACHED RESPONSE APPROVED BY DRC @ 8/4/2011 MEETING PR QUESTION#9/RESPONSE: - THE PORTION OF THE PARKING LOT WHICH ABUTS THE NEW CONSTRUCTION WILL BE CURBED -SEE ATTACHED. RESPONSE APPROVED BY DRC @ 8/4/2011 MEETING PR QUESTION#10/RESPONSE: - 14 APARTMENTS ON SITE RESPONSE APPROVED BY DRC @ 8/4/2011 MEETING PR QUESTION#11 /RESPONSE: - REFERENCE SITE PLAN FOR VISIBILITY TRIANGLES-THERE IS A 42" OAK TREE WHICH IS WITHIN THE LIMITS OF THE VISIBILITY TRIANGLE-SEE ATTACHED SITE LANDSCAPE PLAN. OAK IS TO REMAIN AND SHRUBS NOT TO EXCEED 30" HIGH IN VISIBILITY TRIANGLE-TYP. RESPONSE APPROVED BY DRC @ 8/4/2011 MEETING PR QUESTION#12/RESPONSE: - FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION/DATED 06/30/2011 /SEE ATTACHED. RESPONSE APPROVED BY DRC @ 8/4/2011 MEETING STORMWATER REVIEW SR QUESTION#1 /RESPONSE: - STORMWATER IS TO BE RE-ROUTED AROUND PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION THRU THE INSTALLATION OF AN ADDITIONAL MANHOLE-SEE ATTACHED SITE LANDSCAPE PLAN. TOP OF NEW MAN HOLE TO BE 49.15. RESPONSE APPROVED BY DRC @ 8/4/2011 MEETING 3 TRAFFtC ENGINEERING REVIEW TER QUESTION#1 /RESPONSE:- WE HAVE PROVIDED THE DIMENSIONS OF ALL PARKING SPACES, AISLES,AND HC AISLE ADJACENT TO HC PARKING SPACES/PER CDC SECTION 3-1402 A/SECTION 3-1409/SEE ATTACHED. HC SIGN QATA HAS BEEN ADDED TQ DOCUMENTS RESPONSE APPROVED BY DRC @ 8i4J2011 MEETING TER QUESTION#2 t RESPONSE: - WE HAVE PROVIDED HC PARKING STALL&SIGNAGE DETAILS—SEE ATTACHED. RESPONSE APPROVED BY DRC @ 8/4/2011 MEETING TER QUESTION#3/RESPONSE: - WE HAVE SHOWN THE 20'X 20'VISIBILITY TRIANGLES AT THE DRIVEWAY W/CONDITIONS PER CDC 3- 904.THERE IS A 42° UAK TREE WHICH IS WITHIN THE LIMITS OF THE VISIBILITY TRIAMGLE—SEE ATTACHED SITE LANDSCAPE PLAN. OAK tS TO REMAIN AND SHRUBS NOT TO EXCEED 30"HIGH IN VISIBILITY TRIANG�E—TYP. RESPONSE APPROVED BY DRC�8/4/2011 MEETING TER QUESTION#4 I RESPt3NSE:- WE HAVE SHOWN THE PAVEMENT MARKINGS OF ALL PARKING SPACES ON THE S1TE PLAN—SEE ATTACHE D. RESPC?NSE APPROVED BY DRC @ 8/4/2011 MEETING Since�ely, Renker Eich Parks Architects Inc. �� .� a�r �_ ��-!1 Gareth N. Eich, AIA, FARA Architect r=�. �� ►� _.. _