The URL can be used to link to this page

LUP2011-01002 AND REZ2011-01002; 2995 DREW ST COMMON; BAYCARE PROPERTIES INC� 2995 DREW ST COMMON Date Received: 2/7/2011 10:39:44 AM Baycare Properties, Inc. ZONING DISTRICT: LAND USE: ATLAS PAGE: 291B PLANNER OF RECORD: CL PLANNER: Cate Lee, Planner III CDB Meetin�: August 16, 2011 Case Number: LUP2011-01002 Applicant: Ba�Care Health System, Inc. Address: 2995 Drew Street A�enda Item: E.1 (Related to E2 and E.3) STAFF REPORT LAND USE PLAN AMENDMENT I. GENERAL INFORMATION Request: To amend the present Future Land Use Map designations from Residential Medium (RM) and Residential/Office/Retail (R/O/R) to Residential/Office Limited (R/OL) Location: 2995 Drew Street, located on the southwest corner of Drew Street and Bayview Avenue Site Area: 1,733,252 square feet or 39.79 acres MOL II. BACKGROUND This case involves a 39.79-acre property located at the southwest corner of Drew Street and Bayview Avenue and is owned by the Clearwater Housing Authority. The property is comprised of one p arcel and is currently vacant. From the 1970s to 2004 the subject property contained a public housing project, Jasmine Courts. The request is to change the property's Future Land Use Map designations of Residential Medium (RM) and Residential/Office/Retail (R/O/R) to Residential/Office Limited (R/OL). The applicant, BayCare Health Systems, Inc., has indicated that the intended future use of the property will be corporate offices. A Development Agreement and a request for a rezoning of the property from Medium Density Residential (MDR) and Commercial (C) to Office (0) are being processed concurrently with this case (see REZ2011-01002 and DVA2011-06001). The Development Review Committee reviewed a Flexible Standard Development application (FLS2011- 06011) for Baycare Health System, Inc. at its July 7, 2011 meeting. Issuance of the development order is pending approval of the associated cases and required revisions to the site plan. III. SITE AND VICINITY CHARACTERISTICS A. Site Characteristics The property is currently vacant, with internal roads remaining from the previous use as multi-family housing. Adjacent to the property, to the east, is the Calvary Baptist Church, to the west is a mobile home park, to the north are recreational ball fields, and to the south are mobile homes and an RV park. Community Development Boazd — August 16, 2011 - Case LUP2011-01002 -Page 1 of 8 S:�Planning Department\C D BU.and Use AmendmentsU.and Use Amendments�Drew St 2995 LUP2011-01002 Baycaze Properties, Inc\Staff Report\LUP2011-01002 staffreport.doc B. Surrounding Future Land Use and Zoning Designations � � i � t Direction Land Use FLUM Designation Zoning Atlas Desi nation North: Recreational ball fields Recreation/Open Space Open Space/Recreation (R/OS) and Preservation (OS/R) and Preservation �P) �P East: Church Institutional (I} Institutional (I South: Mobile homes Residential Low Mobile Home Park RV Park Medium (RLIv� and (MHP) and Tourist (T) Resort Facilities High (RFH) West: Mobile homes Residential Low Mobile Home Park Medium (RLIv� (MHP) C. Uses and Intensities Allowed by Present and Requested Future Land Use Designations � � ' •� �• , � � 1 1• � �� , � '. � '• i• i i � ' � � � 1 � � 1 TT• 1 T_ z: 1 7 T T��.��1�. Yrimary Uses: ivioaeraie io nign tcesiaenii�i; �.,uw Lc�,�,�y Density Residential Residential ResidentiaUOffice Equivalent; Office; Retail; Overnight accommodation; PersonalBusiness Services Maximum Density: 15 Dwelling Units 18 Dwelling Units 7.5 Dwelling Units Per Acre Per Acre; 30 Per Acre Overnight Accommodation Units Per Acre Maximum Intensity: FAR 0.50; ISR 0.75 FAR 0.40; ISR 0.85 FAR 0.40; ISR 0.75 Consistent Zoning Medium Density Office (0); Office (0); Low Districts: Residential (MDR); Commercial (C); Medium Density Medium High Medium Density Residential Density Residential Residential (MDR) (LMDR) (MHDR) Communiry Development Boazd — August 16, 2011 - Case LUP20ll-01002 - Page 2 of 8 S:�Planning Department\C D B�L,and Use Amendments�I,and Use Amendments�Drew St 2995 LUP2011-01002 Baycare Properties, Inc\Staff ReportU.UP2011-01002 staffreport.doc IV. REVIEW CRITERIA No amendment to the Comprehensive Plan or Future Land Use Map shall be recommended for approval or receive a final action of approval unless it complies with the standards contained in Section 4-603.F, Community Development Code. A. Consistency with the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan [Section 4-603.F.1] Recommended Findings of Fact.• Applicable goals, objectives and policies of the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan which support the proposed amendments include: Goal A.2 A sufficient variety and amount of Future Land Use categories shall be provided to accommodate public demand and promote infll development. Goal A.4 The City shall not permit development to occur unless an adequate level of service is available to accommodate the impacts of development. Areas in which the impact of existing development exceeds the desired levels of service will be upgraded consistent with the target dates for infrastructure improvements included in the applicable functional plan element. Policy A.6.1.6 Land use decisions in Clearwater shall support the expansion of economic opportunity, the creation of jobs and training opportunities as well as the maintenance of existing industries through establishment of enterprise zones, activity centers and redevelopment areas and by coordination with the Chamber of Commerce, Tourist Development Council and other economic development organizations and agencies. Policy A.6.2.1 On a continuing basis, the Community Development Code and the site plan approval process shall be utilized in promoting infill development and/or planned developments that are compatible. Policy B.1.3.1 Requests for amendment to the Future Land Use Map will have an analysis of traffic impacts. Objective B.1.4 The City shall specifically consider the existing and planned LOS the road network affected by a proposed development, when considering an amendment to the land use map, rezoning, subdivision plat, or site plan approval. Recommended Conclusions of Law The request does not conflict with the goals, objectives and policies of the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan and furthers said plan as indicated in the following. The proposed corporate offices are compatible with the mix of uses in the area and expand economic opportunity in the City. In addition, the proposal does not degrade the level of service for public facilities below the adopted standards (a detailed public facilities analysis follows in this report). Community Development Boazd — August 16, 2011 - Case LUP2011-01002 -Page 3 of 8 S:�Planning Department\C D BU.and Use AmendmentsU.and Use Amendments�Drew St 2995 LUP2011-01002 Baycare Properties, Inc\Staff Report\LUP2011-01002 staffreport.doc B. Consistency with the Countywide Plan Rules Recommended Findings of Fact: Section 2.3.3.4.1 of the Countywide Plan Rules states that the purpose of the Residential/Ofiice Limited (R/OL) future land use classification is to depict those areas of the county that are now developed, or appropriate to be developed, in an office and/or urban low density residential use; and to recognize such areas as well-suited for such limited mixed-use consistent with the surrounding uses, transportation facilities and natural resource characteristics of such areas. Section 2.3.3.4.1 also states that the Residential/Office Limited (R/OL) future land use classification is generally appropriate to those locations where it would serve as a transition from more intensive nonresidential use to low density residential or less intensive public/semipublic use; and in areas where a combination of office and residential use is established or is determined appropriate as a means of encouraging reuse and neighborhood scale conversion. These areas are typically in proximity to and served by the collector and arterial highway network. The subject property is located on the south side of Drew Street (a collector road), between US Highway 19 and McMullen Booth Road (both arterial highways), an area that contains a mix of commercial, office and residential uses. Future use of the subject property, with offices, is consistent with the purposes of the ResidentiaUOffice Limited (R/OL) future land use category and compatible with surrounding properties and the neighborhood. Recommended Conclusions of Law The proposed Future Land Use Map amendment is consistent with the purpose and locational characteristics of the Countywide Plan Rules. G Compatibility with Surrounding Property/Character of the City & Neighborhood [Section 4-603.F.3 and Section 4-603.F.6] Recommended Findings of Fact.• Existing surrounding uses consist of the Calvary Baptist Church and associated buildings, recreational ball fields, and multifamily dwellings. Not immediately adjacent, but in proximity to the subject site, are offices and commercial uses. The future land use designations of surrounding properties include Institutional (I), Recreation/Open Space (R/OS), Preservation (P), Residential Low Medium (RLM) and Resort Facilities High (RFH). The proposed offices on the subject property are compatible with the surrounding properties and neighborhood. The proposed Residential/Office Limited (R/OL) future land use category permits 7.5 dwelling units per acre and a floor area ratio (FAR) of 0.40. The future land use designations of surrounding properties include Institutional (I) (12.6 Dwelling Units Per Acre; �'AR 0.65), Recreation/Open Space (R/OS) (FAR 0.25), Preservation (P) (FAR 0.10), Residential Low Medium (RL1V� (10 Dwelling Units Per Acre; FAR 0.50) and Resort Facilities High (RFH) (30 Dwelling Units Per Acre; FAR 1.2). The Residential/Office Limited (R/OL) future land use classification requested is consistent Community Development Boazd — August I6, 2011 - Case LUP2011-01002 -Page 4 of 8 S:�Planning Department\C D B�I,and Use Amendments�L,and Use Amendments�Drew St 2995 LUP2011-01002 Baycare Properties, Inc\Staff Report\LUP2011-01002 staffreport.doc with the surrounding future land use classifications that exist in the vicinity of the subject property. Recommended Conclusions of Law The proposed future land use designation will allow offices at a density and scale that is consistent with existing institutional and residential uses in the vicinity of the subject property. As such, the proposed amendment will allow development that is in character with the surrounding area. The proposed future land use designation is in character with the overall Future Land Use Map designation in the area. Further, the proposal is compatible with sunounding uses and consistent with the character of the sunounding properties and neighborhood. D. Sufficiency of Public Facilities (Section 4-603.F.5] Recommended Findings of Fact: To assess the sufficiency of public facilities needed to support potential development on the property, the m�imum development potential of the property under the present and requested Future Land Use Map designations was analyzed (see Table 1}. The request for amendment to the Residential/Office Limited (R/OL) Future Land Use Map category would decrease the amount of development potential allowed on the site (see Table 1 below). Table 1. Development Potential for Existing & Proposed FLiTM Designations Site Area 37.09 AC 2.70 AC 39.79 AC (1,615,640 SF) (117,612 SF) (1,733,252 SF) Present FLUM Present FLUM Requested Designation Designation FLUM Net Change «�„ «��„ Designation "R/OL" 556 DUs 48 DUs 298 DUs -306 DUs M�imum g07,820 SF 47,044 SF 693,300 SF -161,564 SF Development 0.50 FAR 0.40 FAR 0.40 FAR -0.05 FAR Abbreviations: FLIJM — Future Land Use Map DUs — Dwelling units AC — Acres FAR — Floor area ratio SF — Square feet Community Development Boazd — August 16, 2011 - Case LUP2011-01002 - Page 5 of 8 S:�Planning Department\C D B�L,and Use Amendments�L,and Use Amendments�Drew St 2995 LUP2011-01002 Baycaze Properties, Inc\Staff Report\LUP2011-01002 staffreport.doc As shown in Table 2 below, the proposed change will not degrade public facilities and services below acceptable levels. Table 2. Public Facilities Level of Service Analysis � '� • � ' � Public Present FLUM Requested Net Capacity Facility/Service present FLUM Designation FLUM Change Available? Designation ��R/O/R" Designation ��RM�� "R/OL „ Streets 3,783 Trips 915 Trips 4,974 Trips 276 Yes Potable Water 144,874 GPD 4,704 GPD 69,330 GPD -80,248 Yes Wastewater 130,386 GPD 3,763 GPD 55,464 GPD -78,685 Yes 1,410 240 Tons/Year 1,872 222 Solid Waste Tons/Year Ton/Year Yes Parkland 0.0 Acres 0.0 Acres 0.0 Acres 0 Yes Public School Facilities3 Yes Elementary 83.4 Students 72 Students 44.7 Students -45.9 Yes Middle 3.36 Students -21.42 School 38.92 Students 20.86 Students Yes High School 55.6 Students 4.8 Students 29.8 Students -30.6 Yes Notes: �_:�_. • r.__.-,. n:_,.n,.,. �,........ �,..... .:4o ua.,., v,.�o 1. ISQJCIl Vll'cIVGId�G Ually Ui�JJ }lci $i.7casc u�w�.� i ��i�.un� �,vuiiiy �.vuaaij�Jra a. uu u w. - Residential Medium (RM) - ResidentiaUOffice/Retail (R/O/R) - ResidentiaUOffice Limited (R/OL) ,. GPD — Gallons per day. �. Based on 4.0 acres of parkland per 1,000 persons and 2.2 persons per unit. 4. Pinellas County School Board student generation rate per unit: - Elementary School: 0.15 students per unit x 1 unit - Middle School: 0.07 students per unit x 1 unit - High School: 0.10 students per unit x 1 unit As shown in Table 3 below, the potential additional maximum daily trips associated with the requested for amendment to the Residential/Office Limited (R/OL) Future Land Use designation would not lower the operating level of service for Drew Street. Communiry Development Board — August 16, 20ll - Case LUP2011-01002 -Page 6 of 8 S:�Planning Department\C D BU.and Use AmendmentsU.and Use Amendments�Drew St 2995 LUP2011-01002 Baycaze Properties, Inc\Staff Report\LUP2011-01002 staff report.doc Table 3: Maximum Potential Traffic Drew Street Existing Current Proposed Net (US 19 to McMullen Booth Road) Conditions FLUMI FLUMZ Tri s Potential Additional Maximum Daily Tri s N/A 4,698 4,974 275 Potential Additional Maximum PM Peak N/A 446 473 26 HourTri s3 Roadway Volume 18,784 23,480 23,758' 275 Roadway Level of Service PM Peak Hour C C C' Ado ted Roadway Level of Service Standard D Peak Hour Abbreviations and Notes: N/A = Not Applicable. FLUM = Future Land Use Map, Clearwater Comprehensive Plan. 1. Based on PPC calculations of 339 trips per day per acre in the ResidentiaUOffice/Retail (R/O/R) future land use category and 102 trips per day per acre in the Residential Medium (RM) future land use category. 2. Based on PPC calculations of 125 trips per day per acre in the Residential/Office Limited (R/OL) future land use category 3. Based on MPO K-factor of 0.095. 4. Source: Pinellas County Metropolitan Planning Organization 2010 Level of Service Report. 5. Based on a comparison between the Pinellas County Metropolitan Planning Organization 2010 Level of Service Report and the 2009 Florida Department of Transportation Quality/Level of Service Handbook. Recommended Conclusions of Law Based upon the findings of fact, it is determined that the traffic generated by the proposed amendment will not result in the degradation of the existing level of service on Drew Street. The Development Agreement proposes several transportation improvements that will enhance the operational efficiency of the intersection at Drew Street and Bayview Avenue, as well as improve site access at the two points of ingress and egress. There is an increase in demand of solid waste service, but there is adequate capacity to accommodate the maximum demand generated by the proposed amendment. Furthermore, potable water, wastewater, parkland, recreation facilities, public school facilities and mass transit will not be affected by the proposed amendment. E. Impact on Natural Resources [Section 4-603.F.5] Recommended Findings of Fact: No wetlands appear to be located on the subject property. The property contained multi- family housing unti12004. Recommended Conclusions of Law Based on current information, no wetlands appear to be located on the subject property. The intent of the applicant is to redevelop the property as offices. The proposed redevelopment is required to be compliant with the City's tree preservation and storm water management requirements. Community Development Boazd — August 16, 2011 - Case LUP2011-01002 -Page 7 of 8 S:�Planning Department\C D B�I,and Use Amendments�I,and Use Amendments�Drew St 2995 LUP2011-01002 Baycare Properties, Inc\Staff ReportU.UP20ll-01002 staff report.doc V. REVIEW PROCEDURE Approval of the Future Land Use Map amendment does not guarantee the right to develop the subject property. The Future Land Use Map amendment is subject to approval by the Pinellas Planning Council and Board of County Commissioners acting as the Countywide Planning Authority. Based on the size of the parcel, review and approval by the Florida Department of Economic Opportunity (Division of Community Planning) is required. The property owner must comply with all laws and ordinances in effect at the time development permits are requested, including transportation concurrency provisions of the Concurrency Management System in Division 9, Community Development Code. VI. RECOMMENDATION Based on the foregoing, the Planning and Development Department recommends the following action: Recommend APPROVAL of the request for Future Land Use Map amendment from the Residential Medium (RM) and Residential/Office/Retail (R/O/R) classifications to the Residential/Office Limited (R/OL) classification. Prepared by Planning & Development Department staff: �%"'v --�� Catherine Lee Playny ar TTT Attachments: Resume Application for Future Land Use Plan Amendment Location Map Aerial Photograph of Site and Vicinity Future Land Use Map Zoning Map Existing Surrounding Use Map Site Photographs Community Development Boazd — August 16, 2011 - Case LUP2011-01002 -Page 8 of 8 S:�Planning Department\C D BU.and Use Amendments�L,and Use Amendments�Drew St 2995 LUP2012-01002 Baycare Properties, Inc\Staff ReportU.UP20] 1-01002 staff report.doc Catherine Lee, LEED Green Associate 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, FL 33756 727-562-4557 catherine.lee(a�mvclearwater.com PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE Planner III, Long Range Division October 201 D to Present Planner II, Long Range Division November 2008 to October 2010 City of Clearwater, Clearwater, Florida Responsible for numerous aspects of the Growth Management Act of Florida such as comprehensive planning, Future Land Use Plan amendments, rezonings, and annexations. Update Community Development Code by Ordinance. Prepare staff reports for the City Council and Community Development Board. Coordinate and manage various projects. Planner I and Planner II, Development Review Division City of Clearrvater, Clearwater, Florida March to October 2008 Provided information to the public concerning the City's Community Development Code, Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan, Beach by Design and general zoning information. Reviewed building plans for compliance with the Community Development Code. Presented Flexible Standard Development applications before the Development Review Committee. • Research Assistant Geography Department, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah September 2007 to January 2008 Contributed research on various land use and planning issues, including locally unwanted land uses and their roles in the American West for Dr. Richard H. Jackson, AICP. • Teaching Assistant Geography Department, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah January 2007 to December 2007 Explained North American land use patterns and concepts to students, including planning history and current practices. Graded student writing and exams, providing feedback for improvement and clarification of planning concepts. Planning Intern City of Port Angeles, Port Angeles, Washington May to August 2007 Assisted citizens at the zoning counter regarding the City's Municipal Code. Performed research related to intergovernmental cooperation, comprehensive plan amendments, and code changes. Presented research fmdings to the Planning Commission. EDUCATION Bachelor of Science in Urban, Rural and Environmental Planning, Brigham Young University, 2007 ASSOCIATION MEMBERSHIP • American Planning Association • LEED Green Associate S:�Planning Department\C D B\Land Use Amendments�I,and Use Amendments\Drew St 2995 LUP2011-01002 Baycare Properties, Inc\Maps\LUP,REZ201 1-01 002,DVA2011-06001 Location Map.doc � � ;t d �� ;' :"' � Ef �,,, � � 1 _ �l1�IIIt� , • . �rs _ �. _ .� 1 � � ± sF',. t r .' R : : - - : � _ ., a � �► • '�r � . . . . . - . . _ w. ' . � .,, .� � 4,� �". �, -., . a ^ . . .. ,. - `r . � , .. . _ � i , —"`� �� f �.�" " z �'.�.,{ i £ � . X�W��.�� ;� o ,— �,t � • � %,� � ,,�•,, -; �„ � '�" ��s . � ' � � � . i� �i 1 __ c`�a.� <. �. ^5�� '� * f t �*',- �.. ; �, �� / •^' ' � ' : . � � . � tr� , • � f • e� t . ,_� r ` "; }� � ��, r r�"�! , ti �. � � i+� � a ' "�" i; '� o ,. '"} ...i � t.� tc " z � y� 6 �,.' � .�" ` , .7 � � � ,�� : � ,� , � � ,� t�, � �� :� S$�� M1 � e aA . ��4 1� I , II '. = J.�9Y �i � , �..I�z � '� ��+ N ,i'7 Vi,�.� T ' �, ��f � ♦ ns.mMb•� I� � . , . � � � � i ♦ , �f '. �� F.� - � , ' �� ;"",�' 'f .�;.;....t i � y } �s \ � � 5� �^ , f ;' �� - � ::- �.., , � . � ��,�':: �'� !� �'� �,f �' �'x � � � �i �9��` r_��'r :. i k � S^ Rx l � "5 1 � 1 1. � �,� , i!,�.,k � +�'At � � 1 � � . a' � „z. ,�� '.,f" �. , � . � �f� a ia µ . �. q ti � � i ?F e� �n y . . y k t� �/ t `� `� . �_i� A� �1 � �,�, S � � '� � � a �� . � .I � � � . i. . � � ,� �.,� _.� �� t$Sr�� . . � �-��` • ;j# �.-. � fP.� �� . .- .._ .. p � .�• .r`' • J ' . � ..�� '�:: . 'Y: �� . 5. .� ' , r � � � ' � � • � �� o .. � , � ., ".,;3 ��:. �',�`� ' � ..�f r . � �1 Y�`�� .:'�`�ks�� ' f � •` � �� . w 1 R ! , �! "3�, � * ..1 �4 e _ �r Y . 1 i` 1 �. ; r, ;,,. �„ �" ,.,,� �c..��. p �'S' ' . j� . �n: � �r , — � � ��' , �` _ �. � � � r: ��W ►'�i+ � � i � +' ,4 �� .�v.� / � �� . �,� � r � ' R� . �� "t-"i�l ... ,�' i,' --� s,,, , �J :,,�,�.._.... f - 1::, b '—� ?�' �, '-� ..� � - ,� � �;,, =�.�—{ �� `' � .. �� ' �'� �'-�� ' � � �f AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH Owner: Clearwater Housing Authority Case: Applicant: BayCare Health System, Inc. � Site: 2995 Drew Street From To: Land Use RM and R/O/R R/OL Properfy Size(Acres): Zoning PIN MDR and C O f � LUP/REZ2011-01002 DVA201 1-06001 39.79 1 7-29-1 6-00000-1 1 0-01 00 Atlas Page: 291 B S:\Planning Department\C D B\Land Use Amendments\Land Use AmendmentslDrew St 2995 LUP20] ]-01002 Baycare Properties, Inc\Maps\LUP,REZ20 1 1-01002,DVA2011-06001 Aerial Photograph.doc S:�Planning Department\C D B\Land Use Amendments\Land Use Amendments\Drew St 2995 LUP201 1-0 1 002 Baycare Properties, Inc�Maps\LUP,REZ201 1-01 002,DVA2011-06001 Future Land Use Map.doc °o ' N � N y N o < 2 MDR OS/R ---- -- � � N N M M . ..__._._...... . ��.��1J�fJl_�l�llllJ■. ■�/I.��li�i��.��.• ��.��u��a�� _ BERMUDA 0 � + v Q�e O �Q'� ` � •'• r y HP � � � z W� � DR N I ])°`' � � y � L N � V � �. o' N �O�'!J'iR O O O O LEEWARD ISLE " �o " `" "' �' ' 13 � — i%��n►rii k vi _° -�, - � .� O "p"i.�__'_� �'1_-f�_M-i � �,.� ' � . � _ _O �O9 B� c�°� n. �r�j I M ��. _•.. �� ---im� _112� '. i a� • 115 ;oo �, . 72Q'►) � DR �� _YNN - ' ,ze "' � ° ° ,, . . .: , _ _ R 1VIHP T ._ � ._. �, � ' "' � . zo, � .. .•.� p�� .22 ��, 225 2� 209_ '�� o `" ' - �.i213 _22�i'�`b �_• .7. i � ZONING MAP Owner: Clearwater Housing Authority Case: LUP/REZ201 1-01 002 Applicant: BayCare Health System, Inc. DVA201 1-06001 Site: 2995 Drew Street Properfy 39.79 Size (Acres) : Land Use Zoning PIN: 17-29-16-00000-110-0100 From : RM and R/O/R MDR and C To: R/OL O Atlas Page: 291 B S:�Planning Department\C D B\Land Use Amendments\Land Use .Amendments\Drew St 2995 LUP2011-01002 Baycare Properties, Inc\Maps\LUP,REZ2011-01002,DVA2011-06001 Zoning Map.doc 0 e d > —� N � � �z:mo j a � �' � N �O a � Z 99< R�rci -- _ Multi-Family Recreational Residential Recreational ball fields w� ball�elds 0 I N � � a� O Oz.e n��., N � � STREET STftEET DREW BERMUDA Ch urch Mobile H�ime Park � � - � Q -I- -� �,�o , �' � , � , � g J p,� � O L I Q--�-- -- � z �. �„ _�_T---- �� W � � , � O L�_' � � z Q ' �• ' ' ,- 2 W � I� m F� � - y � ; � � � N N aEV[urvo Q Q �. � V � � � LEEWARD ISLE �o ° ° � C 13 . '� � .., ■��■��■ '�N - .. ,.r � � ,8� �., � Mobile � 9 � ,�,...� _� ,, . s �+ RV Park � �, N w.- ,- i --- -� Home � ,a s e �� ,'' ` eFamil Par k ,s A�,., nz � I., .� �_ L� ential y i:':�`: � ��' �. L - `� 2 � a r—� € z I„ o�e. •g �'��'3, , �, � � `_� oo �, - „e n�K� 'I � 4 4 R TENHESSEEt,�. �•� AVENUE EXISTING SURROUNDING USES MAP Owner: Clearwater Housing Authority Case: LUP/REZ201 1-01002 Applicant: BayCare Health S stem, Inc. DVA201 1-06001 Site: 2995 Drew Street Properfy 39.79 Size (Acres) : Land Use Zoning P I N : 17-29-16-00000-110-0100 From : RM and R/O/R MDR and C To: R/OL 0 Atlas Page: 291 B S:�Planning Department\C D B\Land Use Amendments\Land Use Amendments\Drew St 2995 LUP201 I-OI002 Baycare Properties, Inc\Maps\LUP,REZ20 1 1-01002,DVA2011-06001 Existing Surrounding Uses Map.doc �.:'� , a :,'s.. . . � I�e.�'.:: . '.. . a_:�........:.... .....__..� View looking south at the subject property, 2995 Drew Street \. .�, e �. � �� South of the subject property, on Bayview Avenue I__ ,_-- � __ . _ _ ------ - � East of the subject property, on Drew Street, Calvary Christian High School . �, rt�'�:fY .. . . � 5 { ! i� i �)� 6 c �, �. `-A"�.� �a i ��. . . �.�„ . ..,��„_.... ,.:, , , ��...:.,,3. _ ,. � .... .. . ...... .. . . . +sr�hm^u°s+ Across Drew Street, to north of the subject property, Eddie C. Moore Complex West of the subject property, on Drew Street East of the subject property, on Drew Street, Calvary Baptist Church LUP2011-01002, REZ2011-01002 and DVA2011-06001 Baycare Health System, Inc. 2995 Drew Street 0 { �, �{ B . , 'e �a��',�'`.�. � � ,, ��o-,��"`� `� `*� ; ``^. �F "s°c"*,. . �'`,.,_ . .. View looking westerly along Drew Street View looking northerly along Bayview Avenue View looking south at "Drive A" from Drew Street . . . '.�j (1�;� � . � M ,� m .c < ,� �{� � ' s^^^��;. ; n ,.c. s ' z. �� `j¢ .. �� . .� E� � � � � ' "�� _ >$ �.4r.. � ,. , .# ' ..xA � .av �i�AiiSPd . , ��. View looking easterly along Drew Street � View looking southerly along Bayview Avenue .: � d�t. � .a� �; ,�- r ,a• '- ,� :�r � � � �� a� . , . -�� '` � �` . . . _ ., . __ . . .. . �. _ . . .. .�.--�c;` ... View looking west at "Drive B" from Bayview Avenue LUP2011-01002, REZ2011-01002 and DVA2011-06001 Baycare Health System, Inc. 2995 Drew Street � � 2995 DREW ST CUMMON Date Received: 1/31/2011 3:09:13 PM Baycare Properties ZONING DISTRICT: LAND USE: ATLAS PAGE: 291B PLANNER OF RECORD: CL PLANNER: Cate Lee, Planner III CDB Meetin�: Au�ust 16, 2011 Case Number: REZ2011-01002 Applicant: BavCare Health Svstem, Inc. Address: 2995 Drew Street A�enda Item: E.2 (Related to E.1 and E.3) STAFF REPORT ZONING ATLAS AMENDMENT I. GENERAL INFORMATION Request: To amend the Zoning Atlas designation from the Medium Density Residential (MDR) and Commercial (C) Districts to the Office (0) District Location: 2995 Drew Street, located on the southwest corner of Drew Street and Bayview Avenue Site Area: 1,733,252 square feet or 39.79 acres MOL II. BACKGROUND This case involves a 39.79-acre property located at the southwest corner of Drew Street and Bayview Avenue and is owned by the Clearwater Housing Authority. The property is comprised of one p arcel and is currently vacant. From the 19�Os to 2004 the subject property contained a public housing project, Jasmine Courts. The request is to change the property's Zoning Atlas designations of Medium Density RPC;�1Pr,tial (Mi�RI and Commercial (Cl to Office (Ol. A Develonment Agreement and a request for a future land use amendment of the properiy from Residential Medium (RM) and Residential/Office/Retail (R/O/R) to Residential/Office Limited (R/OL) are being processed concurrently with this case (see LUP2011-01002 and DVA2011-06001). III. SITE AND VICINITY CHARACTERISTICS A. Site Characteristics The subject property is cunently vacant, with internal roads remaining from the previous multi-family housing use. Adjacent to the property, to the east, is the Calvary Baptist Church, to the west is a mobile home park, to the north are recreational ball fields, and to the south are mobile homes and an RV park. Communiry Development Board — August 16, 2011 - Case REZ2011-01002 -Page 1 of 7 S:�Planning Department\C D B�Zoning Atlas Amendments�REZ 2011�Drew St 2995 REZ201 I-01002 Baycaze Properties, Inc\Staff Report�REZ2011-01002 StaffReport.docx B. Surrounding Future Land Use and Zoning Designations i �i� � Direction Land Use FLUM Designation Zoning Atlas Desi nation North: Recreational ball fields Recreation/Open Space Open Space/Recreation (R/OS) and Preservation (OS/R) and Preservation �p) �P) East: Church Institutional (I) Institutional (I) South: Mobile homes Residential Low Mobile Home Park RV Park Medium (RLIvn and (MHP) and Tourist (T) Resort Facilities High (RFH West: Mobile homes Residential Low Mobile Home Park Medium (RLIv� (MHP) IV. REVIEW CRITERIA No amendment to the Zoning Atlas shall be recommended for approval or receive a final action of approval unless it complies with the standards contained in Section 4-602.F, Community Development Code. A. Consistency of Development with the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan and (:ommunity llevelopment t;ode and t;ity Kegulations �aection 4-6U1.1+.1 and 4- 602.F.2] Recommended Findings of Fact: Applicable goals, objectives and policies of the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan which support the proposed amendments include: Goal A.2 A sufiicient variety and amount of Future Land Use categories shall be provided to accommodate public demand and promote infill development. Goal A.4 The City shall not permit development to occur unless an adequate level of service is available to accommodate the impacts of development. Areas in which the impact of existing development exceeds the desired levels of service will be upgraded consistent with the target dates for infrastructure improvements included in the applicable functional plan element. Policy A.6.1.6 Land use decisions in Clearwater shall support the expansion of economic opportunity, the creation of jobs and training opportunities as well as the maintenance of existing industries through establishment of enterprise zones, activity centers and redevelopment areas and by coordination with the Chamber of Commerce, Tourist Development Council and other economic development arganizations and agencies. Community Development Board — August 16, 2011 - Case REZ2011-01002 -Page 2 of 7 S:�Planning Department\C D B�Zoning Atlas Amendments�REZ 2011�Drew St 2995 REZ2011-01002 Baycare Properties, Inc\Staff Report�REZ2011-01002 StaffReport.docx Policy A.6.2.1 On a continuing basis, the Community Development Code and the site plan approval process shall be utilized in promoting infill development and/or planned developments that are compatible. Objective B.1.4 The City shall specifically consider the existing and planned LOS the road network affected by a proposed development, when considering an amendment to the land use map, rezoning, subdivision plat, or site plan approval. Recommended Conclusions of Law The request does not conflict with the goals, objectives and policies of the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan and furthers said plan as indicated in the following. The proposed corporate offices are compatible with the mix of uses in the area and expand economic opportunity in the City. In addition, the proposal does not degrade the level of service for public facilities below the adopted standards (a detailed public facilities analysis follows in this report). B. Compatibility with Surrounding Property/Character of the City & Neighborhood [Sections 4-602.F.3 and 4-602.F.4] Existing surrounding uses consist of the Calvary Baptist Church and associated buildings, recreational ball fields, and multifamily dwellings. Not immediately adjacent, but in proximity to the subject site, are offices and commercial uses. The zoning designations of surrounding properties include Institutional (I), Open Space/Recreation (OS/R), Preservation (P), Mobile Home Park (MHP) and Tourist (T). The proposed offices on the subject property are compatible with the sunounding properties and neighborhood. The proposed Office (0) District primarily permits offices, parks and recreation facilities, places of worship and schools. All of these uses are in the general vicinity of the subject parcel, two of which are immediately adjacent (parks and recreation facilities and places of worship). The Office (0) zoning district requested is consistent with the surrounding zoning districts that exist in the vicinity of the subject property. The proposed zoning district will allow offices at a density and scale that is consistent with existing institutional and residential uses in the vicinity of the subject property. As such, the proposed amendment will allow development that is in character with the surrounding area. Recommended Conclusions of Law The proposed Zoning Atlas designation is in character with the overall Zoning Atlas designations in the area. Further, the proposal is compatible with surrounding uses and consistent with the character of the surrounding properties and neighborhood. C. Sufficiency of Public Facilities [Section 4-602.F.5] Recommended Findings of Fact: To assess the sufficiency of public facilities needed to support potential development on the property, the maximum development potential of the property under the present and Community Development Board — August 16, 2011 - Case REZ2011-01002 -Page 3 of 7 S:�Planning Department\C D B�Zoning Atlas Amendments�REZ 2011�Drew St 2995 REZ201 I-01002 Baycaze Properties, Inc\Staff Report�REZ201 l -01002 Staff Report.docx requested Future Land Use Map designations was analyzed (see Table 1). The request for amendment to the Residential/Office Limited (R/OL) Future Land Use Map category would allow a decrease in the number of possible dwelling units by 306 and decreases the amount of nonresidential floor area permitted by 161,564 square feet on the subject property. Table 1. Development Potential for Existing & Proposed FLUM Designations Site Area 37.09 AC 2.70 AC 39.79 AC (1,615,640 SF) (117,612 SF) (1,733,252 SF) Present FLUM Present FLUM Requested Designation Designation FLUM Net Change «�„ «��„ Designation "R/OL" 556 DUs 48 DUs 298 DUs -306 DUs Maximum g07,820 SF 47,044 SF 693,300 SF -161,564 SF Development 0.50 FAR 0.40 FAR 0.40 FAR -0.05 FAR Abbreviations: FLUM — Future Land Use Map DUs — Dwelling units AC — Acres FAR — Floor area ratio SF — Square feet The proposed change in designations would allow a decrease in the number of dwelling units and amount of allowable Floor Area Ratio (thus a decrease in square footage). The current Medium Density Residential (MDR) district primarily permits attached and rlPtar_,hPrl riwPllino�; commi�nity resiciential hpme� �n�i sc1��15. The current Commercial (C) district primarily permits offices, overnight accommodations, restaurants and retail sales and services. The proposed Office (0) District primarily permits offices, parks and recreation facilities, places of worship and schools. Community Development Boazd — August I6, 2011 - Case REZ2011-01002 -Page 4 of 7 S:�Planning Department\C D B�Zoning Atlas Amendments�REZ 2011�Drew St 2995 REZ201 1-01 002 Baycaze Properties, Inc\Staff ReportUZEZ20ll-01002 StaffReport.docx Table 2. Public Facilities Level of Service Analysis �� . � � � Public Present FLUM Requested Net Capacity Facility/Service Present FLLTM Designation FLUM Change Available? Designation ��R/O/R" Designation ��RM�� °°R/OL " Streets 3,783 Trips 915 Trips 4,974 Trips 276 Yes Potable Water 144,874 GPD 4,704 GPD 69,330 GPD -80,248 Yes Wastewater 130,386 GPD 3,763 GPD 55,464 GPD -78,685 Yes 1,410 240 Tons/Year 1,872 222 Solid Waste Tons/Year Ton/Year Yes Parkland 0.0 Acres 0.0 Acres 0.0 Acres 0 Yes Public School Facilities3 Yes Elementary 83.4 Students 7.2 Students 44.7 Students -45.9 Yes Middle 3.36 Students -21.42 School 38.92 Students 20.86 Students Yes High School 55.6 Students 4.8 Students 29.8 Students -30.6 Yes NoteS: 1. Based on average daily trips per acreage figure, Pinellas County Countywide Plan Rules. - i:.°.5�.'�.:.^..,31 1��1��m ;RTA� - ResidentiallOffice/Retail (R/O/R) - ResidentiaUOffice Limited (R/OL) 2. GPD — Gallons per day. 3. Based on 4.0 acres of parkland per 1,000 persons and 2.2 persons per unit. 4. Pinellas County School Board student generation rate per unit: - Elementary School: 0.15 students per unit x 1 unit - Middle School: 0.07 students per unit x 1 unit High School: 0.10 students per unit x 1 unit The Trip Generation Comparison by Zoning Atlas Designation in Table 3 below indicates the estimated trip generation for specific uses allowed in the current and proposed zoning districts based on the Institute of Transportation Engineer's (ITE) Trip Generation 8ry Edition. The table shows that while there would be a net increase in PM Peak Trips for a General Office Building, allowed in the proposed Office (0) District, there would be a net decrease in PM Peak Trips for the development proposed in the current Development Agreement case (see DVA2011-06001), Corporate Headquarters Office Building. The Development Agreement proposes several transportation improvements that will enhance the operational efficiency of the intersection at Drew Street and Bayview Avenue, as well as improve site access at the two points of ingress and egress. Community Development Boazd — August 16, 2011 - Case REZ201 I-01002 -Page 5 of 7 S:�Planning Department\C D B�Zoning Atlas Amendments�REZ 2011�Drew St 2995 REZ2011-01002 Baycare Properties, Inc\Staff Report�REZ2011-01002 Staff Report.docx Table 3: Trip Generation Comparison by Zoning Atlas Designation PM Net Development A�g' C ange Peak PM peak Change Land Use p o t e n t i a l Daily A v g D a i l y Trips T r i p s PM Trips Trips A�g Peak Rate Tri s Existin Desi nation: Commercial District Specialty Retail Center 47,044 SF 2,085 N/A 5.02 236 N/A (4432 trips/1,000 SF GFA Existin Desi nation: Medium Densi Residential District Single-Family Detached 556 DU 5,320 N/A 1.02 567 N/A Housing2 (9.57 trips/unit) Low-Rise Apartment 556 DU 3,664 N/A 0.62 344 N/A 6.59 tri s/unit Pro osed Desi nation: Office District General Office Building 693,300 SF 7,633 228 1.49 1,033 230 (11.01 trips/1,000 SF GFA) Permitted Use throu h Develo ment A reement VA2011-06001 Corporate Headquarters 300,000 SF 2,394 -5,011 1.40 420 -383 Office Building5 (7.98 tri s/1,000 SF GFA Abbreviations and Notes: N/A = Not Applicable. SF = Square Feet GFA = Gross Floor Area 1. Institute of Transportation Engineer's Trip Generation 8th Edition Land Use 814. 2. Institute of Transportation Engineer's Trip Generation 8th Edition Land Use 210. 3. Institute of Transportation Engineer's Trip Generation 8th Edition Land Use 22l . 4. Institute of Transportation Engineer's Trip Generation 8th Edition Land Use 710. 5. Institute of Transportation Engineer's Trip Generation 8th Edition Land Use 714. 6. Total gross floor area ratio permitted by the underlying R/O/R Future Land Use Map category is 0.40. 7. Total dwelling units permitted by the underlying RM Future Land Use Map category is 15 units per acre. 8. Total dwelling units permitted by the underlying RM Future Land Use Map category is 15 units per acre. 9. Total gross floor azea ratio permitted by �e underlying R/OL Future Land Use Map category is 0.40. ] 0. DVA2011-06001 limits development of the subject site to 300,000 square feet of office space. Recommended Conclusions of Law Based upon the findings of fact, it its determined that the traffic generated by the proposed amendment will not result in the degradation of the existing level of service on Drew Street. There is an increase in demand of solid waste service, but there is adequate capacity to accommodate the maximum demand generated by the proposed amendment. Furthermore, potable water, wastewater, parkland, recreation facilities, public school facilities and mass transit will not be affected by the proposed amendment. Community Development Board — August 16, 2011 - Case REZ201 I-01002 -Page 6 of 7 S:�Planning Department\C D B�Zoning Atlas Amendments�REZ 201 I�Drew St 2995 REZ201 1-0 1 002 Baycare Properties, Inc\Staff Report�REZ201 1-0 1 002 StaffReport.docx D. Location of District Boundaries [Section 4-602.F.6] Recommended Findings of Fact: The location of the proposed Office (0) District boundaries is consistent with the boundaries of the subject property. The proposed Office (O} District boundaries would consolidate the subject property into a single zoning district. The proposed Office (0) District is compatible with the place of worship use to the east, multi-family uses to the west and south and parks and recreation facilities use to the north. Recommended Conclusions of Law The district boundaries are appropriately drawn in regard to location and classifications of streets, ownership lines, existing improvements and the natural environment. V. REVIEW PROCEDURE Approval of the Zoning Atlas amendment does not guarantee the right to develop the subject property. The property owner must comply with all laws and ordinances in effect at the time development permits are requested, including transportation concurrency provisions of the Concurrency Management System in Division 9, Community Development Code. VI. RECOMMENDATION Based on the foregoing, the Planning and Development Department recommends the following action: Recommend APPROVAL of the request for Zoning Atlas amendment from the Medium Density Residential (MDR) and Commercial (C) districts to the Office (0) District. . ��'! �,. Prepared by Planning & Development Department staff: �.�, �' Catherine Lee Planner III Attachments: Resume Application for Future Land Use Plan Amendment Location Map Aerial Photograph of Site and Vicinity Future Land Use Map Zoning Map Existing Surrounding Use Map Site Photographs Community Development Boazd — August 16, 201 I- Case REZ2011-01002 -Page 7 of? S:�Planning Department\C D B�Zoning Atlas Amendments�REZ 2011�Drew St 2995 REZ2011-01002 Baycare Properties, Inc\Staff Report�REZ2011-01002 StaffReport.docx M CITY OF CLEARWATER S��' r�, APPLICATION FOR � '�� a COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT a � qq�A�� (INCLUDIN pLANNING DEPARTMENT ENDMENT) MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, 2"d FLOOR PHONE (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4576 APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNERS, AND AGENT INFORMATION: APPLICANT NAME: MAILING ADDRESS: Bay Care Health System, Inc. (Attn: James Orr) 8452-118th Avenue North, Largo, Florida 33773 PHONE NUMBER: 727-394-6576 FAX NUMBER: Clearwater Housing Authority (Attn: Jacqueline Rivera, CEO) PROPERTY OWNERS: P. O. Box 960, C1eaLwater, FL 33757-0960 (List all owners) . ng , s AGENTNAME: �TOrll'1SOri� Pope, Bokor, Ruppel & Burns, LLP MAILING ADDRESS: PHONE NUMBER: 911 Chestnut Street, Cleazwater, FL 33756 727-461-1818 .727-462-0365 FAX NUMBER: SITE INFORMATION: 2985 and 2995 Drew Street LOCATION: SOUt.Y1W2St corner of Drew Street and Bayview Avenue STREET ADDRESS: VaCc"�rit LEGAL DESCRIPTION: See �Llblt ��A�� attached. PARCEI NUMBER: SIZE OF SITE: FUTURELAND USE CLASSIFICATION: 17-29-16-00000-110-0100 39.79. acres m.o.l. PRESENT: ZONING CLASSIFICATION: PRESENT PROPOSED TEXT AMENDMENT (use additional paper if necessary) RM and R/O/R NIDR and C N/A I(We), the undersigned, acknowledge that all representations made in this application are true and accurate to the best of my/(our) knowledge Si ure of property owner or representative E. D. Armstrong III, Esquire Signature of property owner or representative R/OL REQUESTED: � REQUESTED: STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS Sw�y and subscribed before me this ��`— day of , A.D., ��l to me by E. ong , who is personally known ��b a�. C� . Not public .......�..r.� my ommission expires: ,,,,,,,, ; �ti:�::r�� : JAYNE E. SEARS :,: � :�; Commission # DD 907040 Bonded Thru Troy Fan Insu2nc¢ 800.3857019 CITY OF CLEARWATER APPLICATION FOR ZOIVING ATLAS AMENDMENT PLANNING DEPARTMENT MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, 2"d FLOOR PHONE (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4576 APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNERS, AND AGENT INFORMATION: BayCare Health System, Inc. (Attn: James Orr) APPLICANT NAME: MAILINGADDRESS: 8452—�-1HtY1 AVP_IlUe NOY'tl'1� IcZI'CfO� Florida 33773 PHONE NUMBER: 727-394-6576 FAX NUMBER: Clearwater Housing Authority (Attn: Jacx�ueline Rivera, CEO) PROPERTY OWNERS: P. O. Box 960, Clearwater, FL 33757-0960 (List all owners) E. D. Armstrong III, Esquire and AGENT NAME: � i i r MAILWG ADDRESS: 911 C�7�-'StT1Ut S�'�t � Cleazwater, FL 33756 727-4ti1-1R1R ��-a��-n�� PHONE NUMBER: FAX NUMBER: 2985 and 2995 Drew Street SITE INFORMATION: �uthwest corner of Drew Street and Bayview Avenue STREET ADDRESS: V1C3Tlt LEGAL DESCR�PTION: �e EXhl�lt ��A�� attached. PARCEL NUMBER: EXISTING ZONING: 17-29-16-00000-110-0100 37.09 acres zoned "NIDR" + 2,7 acres zoned "C" PROPOSED ZONING: Off1Ce ( ��0�� LAND USE PLAN Ciirrently RM and O cwssiFicATiorv: 1�zesting Residential Office Limited R/OL SIZE OF SITE: 39.:79 acres m.o, l REASON FOR REQUEST: �OPOS2(3 C�2VE?ZOplTlerit of BayCare cozporate headquarters I, the undersigned, acknowledge that all representations made in this application are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge. S' ature of property owner or representative E. D. Azmstrong IIi, Esquire STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS �iyn to and subscribed before me this.�,� �day of A.D.,� GU11 to me and/or by °ng I , who is personally known�� x� �. Notary p ic, my com ission expires: Page 1 of 2 JAYNE E. SEARS Bonded iTni Troy fain I�urance 800.385)019 N. AFFIDAVIT TO AUTHORIZE AGENT: 1. Provlde names of ail propeRy owners on deed — PRINT tull nart�es: Gl.eazwater Housing Authority, a non-profit oorporate body and•politic �u, °s . 2. That (I am/we are) the owner(s) and rewrd title holder(s} of the following described property (address or general bcation): Parcel No. 17-29-16-00000-110-0100 3. That this property constitutes the property ior which a request for a: {describe req�st) Zoning Atlas Amer�ent and 4. That the undersigned thas/have) appoirtted and (doesldo) appoint: E.- D. �rtt4strong III, E��i re, an�d Johnson, Pope, Bokor, Ru}�pel & Bu�s, LLP 911 Chestnut Street, Q�a�.i�, FL 33756 as (histtheir) agent(s) to execute any pettpons or other documents necessary to effect such petidon; 5. That this affidavit has been executed to induce the Ciry of Clearvvater, Fbrida to consider and act on the above described property; 6. That slte visiis to the property are necessary by City representalives in orcler to process this application and the owner authwizes City representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application; 7. That (Ihve), the undersigned authority, hereby ceriify that the foregoing is true and cotrect. Cleazwater Hpusing Authority Property Owner - P�opeAy , � � � �t�-' Property Owner % ; Property, Owne� - t.��cque Riv�era, C� STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS Before me the undersigned, an officer duly commissfoned by the laws of the State of Florida, on this �� day of MSy 2�11 �rsonally appeared JacSqueline R1V�Y'1� Cf7�* Who having been first duly swom Deposes and says that he/she iufly understands the contents of the affidavit that he/she signed. * of Cleaiwater Hausing Authority ��tnR � Pu•�C� I�fll� � � .. � �. *� * MY COI�MISSION N EE 067464 r'"�=��L-''" %�i� ,�r � EXPIRES: febNary 24, 2015 Notary Pub'c Signat re F Bwided iluu Bu 1� %a �% 1s Notary be°Fa�/Stamp ��S My Commission Expires: �,�c /�-� f C:�Documents and SerifngsWerek.fergusonlDesktoplplanning dept forms � ��:�i� : ��.�.� The Northeast '/ of the Northeast '/4 of Section 17, Township 29 South, Range 16 East, Pinellas County, Florida; less and except the North 50 feet thereof for right-of-way for Drew Street; also less and except the East 33 feet thereof for right-of-way for Bayview Boulevard. BAYCARE CORPORATE HQ LAND USE AMENDMENT / REZONING NARRATIVE SUMMARY OWNER: Clearwater Housing Authority PO Box 960 Clearwater, F133757-0960 Applicant/Contract Purchaser/Authorized Representative: BayCare Health System, Inc. (a Florida Corporation) 8452 — 118�' Avenue North Largo, FL 33773 Attn: James Orr Authorized Representative: Authorized Representative: Robert Pergolizzi, AICP/PTP Mr. Ed Armstrong, Esq. Gulf Coast Consulting, Inc. Johnson, Pope, Bokor, Ruppel & Burns, LLP 13825 Icot Boulevard, Suite 605 911 Chestnut Street Clearwater, Fl 33760 Clearwater, F133756 I. INTRODUCTION The subject property consists of 39.79 acres which are located on the south side of Drew Street west of Bayview Avenue in the City of Clearwater. The property is vacant and had been previously developed with apartments. BayCare is considering developing its corporate headquarters and relocating several employees from various locations in the Tampa Bay area into a unified campus. To develop the property with office uses the applicants seek to amend the land use plan for approximately Residential Medium (RM) and Residential/Office/Retail (R/O!R) to Residential/Office Limited (R/OL) and to rezone the site from Medium Density Residential (MDR and Commercial (C) to Office (0). This application is accompanied by a Development Agreement including a Master Plan for the property. II. LAND USE / ZONING The property in question has multiple land use designations and zoning classifications. EXISTING Parcel ID# Size Land Use Zoninp Part of 17/29/16/00000/110/0100 37.09 acres RM MDR Part of 17/29/16/00000/110/0100 2.70 acres R/O/R C TOTAL 39.79 acres The Drew Street corridor between US 19 and McMullen Booth Road contains a mixture of uses including Commercial General (CG), ResidentiaUOffice General (R/OG), Industrial Limited (IL), Residential Low Medium (RLM), Institutional (I), and Recreation/Open Space (R/OS. The proposed land use and zoning are outlined below: PROPOSED Parcel ID# Size Land Use ZoninQ Part of 17/29/16/00000/110/0100 37.09 acres R/OL O Part of 17/29/16/00000/110/0100 2.70 acres R/OL O TOTAL 39.79 acres Surrounding Uses around the subject property: North: Open space on land having a Recreation/Open Space (R/OS) land use designation and Open Space/Recreation (O/SR zoning, containing recreational fields.) South: Mobile home park on land having RLM land use, and MHP zoning, and RV park on land having RFH land use and T(tourist) zoning. East: Calvary Baptist Church on land having Institutional (I) land use and Institutional (I) zoning. West: Mobile home park on land having RLM land use and MHP zoning, west of Hampton Road, office uses and light manufacturing uses on land having IL land use and Industrial Research & Technology (IRT) zoning in the City of Clearwater. Given the mixture of uses, the establishment of a single user office compl�x is reasonable and can be adequately buffered from nearby residential uses by adhering to the standards set forth in the Community Development Code. III. TRANSPORTATION According to Pinellas Planning Council (PPC) criteria the net traffic impact of the plan amendment would be only 268 daily trips as calculated below: Current FLUM Desi nation: 37.09 acres RM @ 96 daily trips/acre = 3,560 daily trips 2.7 acres R/O/R (� 336 daily.trips/acre = 907 daily trips Total = 4,467 daily trips Proposed FLUM Desi na� tion: 39.79 acres R/OL @ 119 daily trips/acre = 4,735 daily trips 2 According to the MPO 2010 Level of Service Report, the segment of Drew Street between U.S. 19 and McMullen Booth Road is reported to operate at Level of Service (LOS) C carrying 18,784 vehicles per day. Capacity is available to support the Land Use Plan Amendment. Furthermore, the applicant anticipates up to 300,000 square feet of office space would be constructed. A detailed traffic analysis was prepared that demonstrates acceptable levels of service along Drew Street will be maintained. Based on ITE Trip Generation, 8`�' Edition, a 300,000 square foot corporate headquarters facility would generate 2,394 daily trips of which 447 trips would occur during the AM peak hour and 420 trips would occur during the PM peak hour. Access to Drew Street is available through a median opening near the western end of the site that could be used for the main project access. Secondary access could be taken via Bayview Avenue. Minor roadway improvements may be necessary to provide safe access. PSTA has several bus routes along Drew Street, so the area is well served by mass-transit. In addition, the nearby recreational trail provides alternate means of access to the area for increased pedestrian usage. IV. AVAILABILITY OF PUBLIC UTILITIES Potable water and sanitary sewer appear to be available to the site. Based on site observation and inspection of the Utility atlas maps obtained from the City of Clearwater, existing water and sewer facilities are available within and immediately adjacent to the site as follows: potable water lines are located within Bayview Avenue; sanitary sewer lines are located within Bayview Avenue, Drew Street, and within the site; reclaimed water lines (for irrigation) are located within Drew Street; and storm-water drainage pipes are located within Bayview Avenue and Drew Street as well as throughout the site. In addition, Clearwater Gas has natural gas lines within Bayview Avenue. It is apparent that power and cable facilities are also located throughout this Drew Street conidor. In summary all utilities appear to be readily available to serve this site. Therefore, sufficient public facilities are available to serve the property. V. OTHER INFORMATION The site is located in a NON-Hurricane Evacuation Zone and is not located within a 100- year floodplain. The consolidation of administrative and back-office functions would bring 500 to 1500 jobs to the City of Clearwater in an area slated for economic redevelopment by the City of Clearwater. The site is large enough to accommodate up to 300,000 square feet of building floor area, associated parking and roadways, while maintaining a large amount of open space, there are no wetlands identified on the property. Therefore, the amendment will not adversely affect the natural environment. 3 VI. CONCLUSION The amendment of the Future Land Use Plan and Zoning Atlas is appropriate and serves to provide consistency and compatibility of the land use designations and zoning districts throughout the campus. The property could be appropriately developed in compliance with all City of Clearwater criteria for Office (0) zoning. The following Comprehensive Plan Goals, Objectives and Policies are furthered by this amendment: Policy A.2.2.6 — Provide for safe on-site traffc circulation and connections to adjacent arterial and collector streets. The project is located on Drew Street a City Major Collector roadway with direct access via full median opening. Policy A.3.2.1 — All new development or redevelopment of property within the City of Clearwater shall meet all landscape requirements of the Community Development Code. The proposed Master Plan provides ample landscape opportunities that can meet and exceed code requirements Policy A.4.1.1 — No new development or redevelopment will be permitted which causes the level of City services (roads, recreation and open space, water, sewage treatment, garbage collection, public school facilities, and drainage to fall below minimum acceptable levels. The development of this property will not cause levels of service for affected city services to fall below acceptable levels. Policy A.6.1.6 — Land Use decisions in Clearwater shall support the expansion of economic opportunity, the creation of jobs and training opportunities as well as the maintenance of existing industries through establishment of enterprise zones, activity centers and redevelopment areas and by coordination with the Chamber of Commerce, Tourist Development Council and other economic development organizations and agencies The BayCare Corporate Headquarters will provide several jobs within the City of Clearwater. The health care industry is vital to the City of Clearwater and is an existing industry the currently provides thousands of jobs (Morton Plant Hospital). The establishment of the BayCare headquarters in the City furthers this policy. Policy A.6.8.9 — Promote a variety of transportation modes such as walking, bicycling, ride-sharing and mass transit to increase transportation choices and decrease dependence on the single-occupancy vehicle. 0 The site is well served by mass transit as PSTA has several routes along Drew Street and Bayview Avenue. The Master Plan includes construction of PSTA bus shelters at these locations, walking paths through the site to the PSTA bus shelters and public sidewalks. The Master Plan also shows a connection to the EC Moore Complex on the north side of Drew Street which in-turn is served by the Ream Wilson Trail which will encourage alternate modes of transportation. Policy B.1.3.1 — Requests for amendment to the Future Land Use Map will have an analysis of traffic impacts. Using PPC traffic criteria the affect of the land use plan request from RM and R/O/R to R/OL is minimal, creating an increase of only 268 daily trips. An analysis was submitted with the application demonstrating acceptable levels of service and identifying improvements. Objective B3.2 — The City of Clearwater shall encourage and promote mass transit with appropriate land use, zoning and land development policies. The site is well served by mass transit and the ability to place a major employment enter adjacent to mass transit facilities furthers this objective. Policy D.1.3.5 — Extend force mains, lift station capacity and gravity wastewater collection systems to serve existing development as well as new infill development. The site is presently served by wastewater lines within Drew Street and Bayview Avenue, this is an infill development that will connect to existing facilities. Policy D.3.3.4 — Development and redevelopment activities shall comply with all stormwater management design standards and criteria The site is large enough to provide on site stormwater retention ponds. The Master Plan depicts the general location of these ponds which will comply with the City criteria. Policy F.1.2.1 — Any construction in the 100-year floodplain shall comply with all requirements and standards of FEMA and the City's building codes The site is not located in a 100-year floodplain and does not affect floodplains. The location of a corporate headquarters complex will not impact floodplains at all. 5 TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS FOR BAYCARE CORPORATE HEADQUARTERS CLEARWATER, FLORIDA PREPARED �OR: BAYCARE PROPERTIES INC. PREPARED BY: GULF COAST CONSULTING, INC. JANUARY 2011 PROJECT # 10-033 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION II. EXISTING CONDITIONS III. FUTURE C4NDITIONS WITH PROJECT IV. CONCLUSION APPENDIX A APPENDIX B Robert Pergolizzi, AICP/PTP AICP # 9023 / PTP #133 I. INTRODUCTION Clearwater Housing Authority (CHA) owns a 39.8 acre site along Drew Street immediately west of Bayview Avenue in Clearwater. (See Figure 1) The site is presently zoned Medium Density Residential (MDR) and Commercial (C) with a Future Land Use Designation of Residential Medium (RM) and Residential/Office/Retail. The CHA plans to sell the property to BayCare for the purpose of consolidating corporate headquarters functions at this location to contain up to 300,000 squaxe feet of space. The CHA is filing a Land Use Plan Amendment and Rezaning Application, and City of Clearwater 1'lanning staff has requested a traffic impact analysis. Prior to completing this iraff`ic analysis a methodology was established with City of Clearwater Traf£'ic Engineering staff. II. EXISTING CONDITIONS The developnnent of this site will have a trafiic impact on the section of Drew Street between US 19 and McMullen Booth Road. This section of Drew Street is a four-lane divided arterial roadway and is controlled by traffic signals at the Hampton Road intersection, and at McMullen Booth Road. To establish existing conditions PM peak period (4-6 PM} intersection tutning movement counts were conducted at the following locations in Januacy 2�11: Drew Street / Hampton Road (signal) Drew Street/ Bayview Avenue Drew Street / McMullen Booth Road (signal) Gulf-to-Bay Blvd. (SR 60} / Bayview Avenue Intersection geometrics and signal tirr�ings were recorded in the field. Based on the MPO 2010 Level of Service Report the adjacent segment of Drew Street operates at LOS C carrying 18,784 vehicles per day AADT. Existing conditions were analyzed using HCS softwa,re. Existing PM peak hour traffic volumes are shown in Figure 2, and the HCS printouts are inciuded in Appendix A. Overall intersection levels of service (LOS) are shown below: EXISTING INTERSECTION LEVELS OF SERVICE - 2011 Intersection Location Tvt�e LOS Avera e�De_laX Drew St. / Hampton Rd. Signal C 28.0 sec/veh Drew St. / Bayview Avenue Unsignal A/D'� 9.6/26.4 sec/veh Drew St. / McMullen Booth Rd. Signal E 66.4 sec/veh Gulf-to-Bay / Bayview Avenue Unsignal C/E* 24.5/42.9 sec/veh * A/D = LOS major street left turn / minor street approach � .00. .�, c 0 ; � � � � � � � W � >• a x 0 0 aa z w a a N � U � EC MO�RE � � M � � �16 1202 i^,� a� � 83i 857 745 -- 563 585 511 N� N -•-- fi2 � � � t� �' 78 � DREW ST � zz ~ � � 1 � � 3ti �sz-- z�, � —� � r 940 � f r 9?, �e, i9 ---� r-- �89 63� 13� '�jF 839 -" � N 0^0 r � N 'L$ -'^ O i0 M 88 � "� � 318 � N M �� CHURCH W � � z W �� " � o � � � x �� '�� o N � 19d n o �n � 2875 �J 1 I--� (� 3 t GULF-TO-BAY BLVD 17 � � � � �sos -- �n ° N a --� EXISTING PM PEAK HOUft TRAFFIC (2Q i i) Gulf Coast Consulting, Inc. DATG: Land Development Consulting JAN/201 1 -1 �: DRAWN BY: MKC PROJCC!' NO: 10-033 rtGUREr The adjacent segments of Draw Street were analyzed using the FDOT Genei•alized Capacity Tabies. The segment between US 19 and Hampton Road operates at LOS C cat7ying 2,142 vehicles during the PM peak hour, the segment between Hampton Road and McMullen Booth Road operates at LOS C carrying 1,778 vehicles during the PM peak hour. EXISTING ROADWAY LEVELS OF SERVICE - 2011 Roadway Segment Lane Peak Hr. LOS D Pk Hr. �Rrom — To) Type Volume Capacity LOS Drew (US 19 — Hampton Road) 4LD 2142 3220 C Drew (Hampton — Bayview) 4LD 1778 3220 C Drew (Bayview—McMullen Booth) 4LD 1374 3220 C III. FUTURE CUNDITIONS WITH PROJECT A. BACKGROUND TRAFFYC The build-out date of the complex is expected to be 2015. As requested by the City of Clearwater, background traffic in 2015 was estimated by applying a 1% annual growth rate to existing traffic. B. PROJECT TRAFFIC The BayCare HQ will consolidate office functions into one location and will contain several meeting rooms, corporate t�aining rootns, file storage and data processing functions. Project traffic was estimated using ITE Titip Generation, 8�` Edition, Land Use Code 714 (Corporate Headquarters}. At full huild-out of 300,000 square feet, the project would generate 2,394 daily trips of which 447 would occur during the AM peak hour (416 entering / 31 exiting) and 420 would occur during the PM peak hour (42 entering / 378 exiting). Projeci traffic was distributed to the roadway system based on the following percentages which were based on residence locations of BayCare employees expected tv work at this complex: 30% west on Drew Street 10% west on Gulf to Bay Boulevard 20% south on McMullen Booth Road 20% north on McMullen Booth Road 20% east on Courtney Campbell Causeway Project trafiic was distributed to the roadway system and the intersections and adjacent segments of Drew Street were reanalyzed. Project traffic fiom the proposed development comprises a moderately significant impact. as compared to the PM peak hour LOS D capacify of nearby roadways, particularly to Drew Sneet. Roadway Segment Lane Project LOS D Project �From — To) Type Traffic Capacitv % Drew (US 19 — Hampton) 4LD +12? 3220 3.94% Drew (Hampton — Site) 4LD +127 3220 3.94% Drew (Site — Bayview) 4LD +144 3220 4.47% Drew {Bayview — McMullen Booth) 4LD +234 3220 7.26% McMullen Booth (SR 60-Drew) 6LD +150 5360 2.80% McMullen Booth {Drew — SR 590) 6LD +84 5360 1.57% SR 60 {Hampton — Bayview) 6LD +42 4880 0.08% SR 60 (Bayview—McMullen Booth) 6LD +17 4880 0.�3% SR 60 (McMullen Booth-Bayshore} 6LD +84 5360 1.Sb% Pinellas County is constructing interseciion improvements at the Drew Street / McMullen Booth Road intersection. These improvements include adding a southbound right turn lane, reconfiguring the noi�thbound approach to provide dual left turn lanes, and modifying the eastbound approach to include dual left turn lanes, a shared leftltluough lane, and an exclusive right turn lane. Other potential modificatians include restricting movements at the westbound approach. These extensive improvements combined with signa.l timing modifications will substantially improve the intersection operations. Future PM peak hour volumes are shown in �igure 3, the HCS printouts are in Appendix B. The expected future intersection levels of service are shown below: FUTURE iNTERSECTION LEVELS OF SERVICE - 2015 Intersection Location Drew St. / Hampton Rd. Drew St. / Bayview Avenue Drew St. / McMullen Booth Rd. Gulf-to-Bay / Bayview Avenue Drew St / Drive A Bayview Ave / Drive B Tvne Signal Unsignal Signal Unsignal Unszgnal Unsignal �' A/C = LOS major street left turn / minor street approach LOS C B/D* D D/F* A/C* A/B* Averag�e Delay 30.1 sec/veh 10.3/28.8 sec/veh 44.6 sec/veh 27.5/52.2 sec/veh 9.7/16.6 sec/veh 73/11.2sec/veh The major intersections would continue to operate at an acceptable level of service considering the Pinellas County improvements ai Drew Street and McMullen Booth Road. Minor tuin lane improvements may be helpful at minor intersections to reduce delay to right turning motorists. With background traffic and project traffic added the adjacent segments of Drew Street would continue to operate at acceptable levels of service. / � ��5 i— 9 cso> 8,2 -- -� r �, Z5> , z —� N M Q '" Q � v / a x H 0 O � z � ��1 -/-� � EC MOORB �� M� a �17 1363 N o a � 979 1006 784 _.__ 595 618 541 N�n � �- 85 � �1 1 I_,_ � �s � DREW ST � z3 � � J � � � az 99, 4 r s�� 94� 92� -- � r ,045 88� (� '� 14 � � I I —�' � —� 20 —7 rn ao —.r. —� 356 � � � I 885._-�. � c� � � f °° � , 50 —�- N rn`rQi 92 � `� � 481 � `� � Q � t ° � c�auxcx N � A SITE ¢ � 420 PM TRIPS DRIVE T3 � � N� n� O(42 ENTERj378 EXIT) (-� 447 AM TRIPS �8) 90 J �� (416 ENT£R/31 EXIT) (3) 38 � � N � � � � M N W o� �t m N � 2�5 n o co -- 2990 � 1 L�. � 3 GULF-TO-BAYBLVD ZZ� -7 i r- � aeo -- � a N a� FUTURE PM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC (2015) �n Gulf Coast Consulting, Inc. DA7��: �� JAN/2011 � Land Development Consulting ` �. �: � DRAWM BY: MKC PROJGCI' NO: �a-o33 FIGURG: FUTURE ROADWAY LEVELS OF SERVICE - 2015 Roadway Segment Lane Peak Hr. LOS D Pk Hr. �From — To) Ty�e Volume Capacitv LO5 Drew (US 19 — Hampton Road) 4LD 2354 3220 C Drew (Hampton — Site Access) 4LD 1976 3220 C Drew (Site Access — Bayview) 4LD 1731 3220 C Drew (Bayview—McMullen Booth) 4LD 1663 3220 C IV. CONCLUSION The campus is expected to include up to 300,000 square feet of corporate headquarters office space at full build-oui. This analysis demonstrates the additional trafiic wi11 comprise approximately 7.26% of the LOS D capacity of the adjacent segtnenf of Drew Street and these segments would continue to operate at acceptable levels of service. The adjacent intersections and roadways segments would continue to operate at acceptable levels of service given improvements under construction by Pinellas County. Additional recommended improvements to be completed by the developer include: 1. Construct project main access to Drew Street (Drive A) to include two exiting lanes to separate left and right turning vehicles, construct an eastbound right turn lane on Drew Street. Lengthen the existing westbound left turn Iane to include 100-feet of full width storage plus deceleration distance. 2. Construct project secondary access to Bayview Avenue. Tha driveway should include two exiting lanes to separate left and right turning vehicles. Construct a northbound left tuim lane on Bayview Avenue to include 175 feet of full width storage plus deceleration distance. 3. At the Drew Street Bayview Avenue intersection construct a northbound left turn lane. 4. Install bus pads and bus shelters along Drew Street and Bayview Avenue to accommodate PSTA routes and provide pedestrian access. 5. Provide pedestrian crosswalk across Drew Street to connect to the EC Moore complex and recreational trail to facilitate pedestrian access. �:�3�+ I�t:�7� A Page 1 of 1 Robert Pergolizzi From: Robert Pergolizzi Sent: Thursday, January 06, 2011 1:48 PM To: 'Himanshu.Patni@myClearwater.com' Subject: Drew Street Site Rezoning - Traffic Study Hinamshu - As we discussed this morning, we will be conducting a detailed traffic study for a Land Use Plan Amendment/Rezone ior the 40 acre site located at Drew Street and Bayview Avenue. The project would include a corpo�ate HQ bulEding(s) for a major employer, and would incfude between 20d,000- 300,000 square feet. According to ITE Trip Generation LUC 714 (Corporate HQ} the site would generate up to 2,394 trips per day , 447 AM peak trips and 420 PM peak trips. Access would be to Drew Street and to Bayview Avenue. GCC will obtain PM peak period (4-6 PM} intersection turning movement counts at the foliowing locations: Drew Street/ Hampton Road Drew Street / Bayviw Avenue Drew Street / McMullen Booth Road Gulf-to-Say / Bayview Avenue Existing condi#ions at these intersections will be analyzed, (inluding improvements being completed at McMulien Booth intersection), future conditions for thes intersections will be anafyzed to include a 1% annual growth rate and project traffic. The segment of Drew Street beiween US 19 and McMullen Booth Road will be analyzed for both existing and future conditions. The study wi{I be submiited with the Plan AmendmentlRezone applications by the February 1, 2011 deadllne. Thanks for your assistance. Robert Pergolizzi, AICP, PTP Gulf Coast ConsulEing, Inc. 13825 ICOT Bouievard, Suite 605 Cleanivater, FI 33760 Phone: 727-524-1818 Fax: i27-524-6090 Celiphon e: 727-644-2695 emaif: pergo@gulfcoastconsultinginc.com 1/6i201 I 2009 Peak Season �actos Category Report - Report Type: ALL Category: 1500 PZNELLAS COUNTYwIDE MOCF: 0.93 Week Dates SF PSCF m,z�za-s-�_-----��s-----:��--_____�__�_�a__��_°�--------------- -- i O1/O1/2009 - O1/03/2009 1.10 1.18 2 O1/04/2009 - O1/10/2009 1.07 1.i4 3 O1/11/2009 - O1/17/2009 trl7�; 1.22 4 O1/18/2009 - O1/24/2009 1.03 1.10 5 O1/25/2009 - O1/31/2009 1.01 1.08 6 •02/O1/2009 - 02/0'I/2�09 0.99 1.06 7 02/OB/2009 - 02/7.4/2009 0.97 1.04 * 6 02/15/2009 - 02/21/2009 0.95 1.02 * 9 02/22/2009 - 02/26/2009 0•94 1.01 *10 03/O1/2009 - 03/07/2009 0.93 1.00 *11 03/OB/2009 - 03/14/2009 0.92 0.98 *12 03/15/2099 - 03/21/2009 0.91 0.97 "13 03/22/2009 - 03/28/2009 0.91 0.97 *14 03/29/2009 - 04/04/2009 0.92 0.98 *15 04/OS/2009 - �9/11/2009 0-92 0.98 *16 04Y12/2009 - 04/18/2009 �.93 1.00 *1'I 04/19/2009 - 04/25/2009 0.94 1.01 *16 04/26/2009 - OS/02/2009 0.95 1.02 *19 OS/03/2009 - OS/09/2009 0.96 1.03 *20 OS/10/2009 - OS/16/2009 0•97 1.04 21 OSl17/2009 - OS/23/2009 0.97 1.04 22 95/24/2009 - OS/30l2009 0.97 1.04 23 05/31/2009 - 06/06/2009 0_97 1.04 24 06/07/2Q09 - 06/13/2009 0.97 1.04 25 06/19/2009 - 06/20/2009 0.97 1.04 26 06/21/2009 - 06/27/2009 0.98 7..05 27 06/28/2009 - 07/04/2009 0.98 1.05 � 28 07/OS/2009 - 0�/11/2009 0.99 1.06 � 29 07/12/2009 - 07/18/2009 0.99 J.•06 30 07/19/2009 - 07/25/2009 I.00 1.07 31 07/26/2009 - 06/O1/2009 1.00 1.07 32 OB/02/2009 - 08/OB/2009 1.01 ' 1.08 33 08/09/2009 - 08/15/2009 1.01 1.06 34 08/16/2009 - 08/22/2009 1.03 1.10 35 OB/23/2009 - OB/29/2009 1.04 1.11 36 08/30/2009 - 09/OS/2009 1.05 1.12 37 09/06/2009 - 09/].2/2009 1.06 1_13 38 09/13/2009 - 09/19/2009 I.07 1.14 39 09/20/2009 - 09/26/2009 1.06 1.13 40 09/27/2009 - 7.0/03/2009 1.06 1_13 41 10/04/2009 - 10/10/2009 1.05 1.12 42 10/11/2009 - 10/1?/2009 1.05 1.12 A3 10/18l2009 - 10/24/2009 1.05 1.12 44 10/25/2009 - 10/31/20�9 1.06 1.13 45 11/O1/2009 - 11/07/2004 1.07 1.14 46 11/08/2009 - 11/lA/2009 1.08 1.16 47 11/15/2009 - 11/21/2009 1.08 1.16 48 11/22/2009 - 11/28/2009 1.09 1.17 49 11/29/2009 - 12/OS/2009 1.09 1.17 50 22/06/2009 - 12/12/2009 1.09 1.1? 51 12/13/2009 - 12/19/2009 1.10 1.18 52 12/20/2009 - 12/26/2009 1.07 1.14 53 12/27/2009 - 12/31/2Q09 1.05 1.12 * Peak Seasoa Page 1 of 2 Detailed Report Page 1 of 1 HCS+"" DETAILED REPORT General lnformatlon Site Informatlon Analysf RP Intersection DREW/HAMPTON Agency or Co. GCC Area Type A!/ other areas Date Performed 1/14/2011 Jurisdiction CLEARWATER Time Period PM PEAK Analysis Year 2091 EX1STlNG Project ID Volume and Tfmin In u! EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Number of Lanes, N� 1 2 0 ? 2 4 1 9 0 1 9 0 Lane Grou L TR L TR L TR L TR Valume, V(v h 13 839 88 18 831 8 344 2 78 4 0 27 % Heavy Vehicles, °loHV 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 .90 0.90 0.90 Pretimed P) or Actuated A A A A A A A A A A A A A Start-up Lost Time, I� 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Extension of Effeative Green, e 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival Ty e, AT 3 4 3 4 3 3 3 3 Unit Extension, UE 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 FflteringlMetering, I 1.000 9.000 1.000 1.000 9.000 1.000 7.000 9.000 Initial Unmet Demand, Qn 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Ped / Bike ! RTOF2 Volumes 0 0 20 0 0 0 0 0 30 0 0 10 Lane Width 12.0 12,0 42.0 92.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 �2.0 Parking ! Grade / Parking N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N Parking Maneuvers, Nm Buses Stopping, Ns 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Min. Time for Pedestrians, GP 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2 Phasing Excl. I.eft EW Perm 03 04 NS Rerm Q6 07 08 G= 7.0 G= 38.0 G= G= G= 20.0 G= G= G= Timing Y= 5 Y= 5 Y= Y= Y= 5 Y= Y= Y= Duration of Anai sis, T= 0.25 C c{e Length, C= 80.0 Lane Grou Ca aci Control De1a , and LOS Deferminaffon EB WB NB SB l.T TH RT l.T TH ftT LT TH RT LT TN RT Adjusted Flow Rate, v �4 1008 20 932 382 55 4 19 Lane Group Capacity,c 373 1666 346 1682 347 398 336 396 v/c Ratio, X 0.04 0.61 0.06 0.55 1.10 0.?4 0.01 0.05 Totai Green Ratio, g/C 0.63 0,47 0.63 0.47 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 Uniform Delay, d� 6.7 15.5 7.0 15.0 30.0 23.3 22.6 22.8 Progression Factor, PF 1.000 0.803 9.000 0.803 1.000 �.000 1.000 9.000 Delay Calibration, k 0.11 0.19 0.11 0.15 0.50 0.11 0.19 0.19 Inc�emenial Delay, d2 0.0 0.6 0.1 0.4 78.2 0.2 0.0 0.9 Initial Queue Delay, d3 p.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Control Delay 6.7 13.1 7.1 12.4 108.2 23.5 22.fi 22.8 Lane Group LOS A 8 A B F C C C Approach Delay 93.0 12.3 97.6 22.8 Approach LOS 8 8 F C lntersection Delay 28.0 X� = 0•�� Intersection LOS C Copyright O 2007 University of Florida, Afi Rights Reserved JiCStT�''� Verston 5.3 Generated: 1M412011 70:37 AM fle://C:1Documents and Settingslrpergolizzi.GULFCOAST1Loca1 Settings\Temp1s2k4D,tmp 1/14/2011 PROJECT: LOCATION: DA • LAN l'YPE: NB SB EB WB PEAK HOUR PEAK HOUR / P.H.F. DATA BAY CARE DREW ST SITE PROJECTNO: to-033 Hampton Rd {NS) & Drew St (E-YI� January 12,2011 SPEED LIMff: SIGNAL TIMfNG: @ C,3 Y R {SECONDS) 3 La�e NB 35 NB WA 16 4 64 2 Lane SB {V/A SB WA 16 4 64 4 Lane Div EB 35 EB 9 55 4 24 4 l.ane Oiv WB 35 WB NIA 33 4 34 PM PEAK NOUR COUNTS TIME NB NB NB SB S8 SS EB EB E8 WB WB WB TOTAL HOURLY PM L T R L T R L T R L T R VOLUME VOLUMES 4:00-4:'15 356 4:15�430 368 4:30-4:45 406 4:45-6:00 429 1,559 5:00.5:15 502 1,705 5:15-5:30 593 '1,930 5:3Q5:45 544 2,068 FFOUIiLY FLOW DIAGRAM 5:45-6:00 506 2,945 30 22 596 2 122 6 0 26 22 1,37� 157 43 1.345 12 3,7p4 1 } I i7ME NB NB NB SB SB SB EB EB EB WB WB WB TOTAL 26 0 4 PM L T R L T R L T R L T R VOLUME I � I �_I L. 5:00-5:15 502 1,145 �--- 12 ^^—� t— 8 �--816 5:15-5:30 593 739 —► �--- 791 5:30-5:45 544 895 —► 84 --� .� 17 —► 877 5:45-6:00 506 �-7 � � I 328 2 74 4 0 26 12 799 84 '17 791 8 2,145 328 2 74 irrr�atsECnoni �a�c Houtt INTERSECTION PEAlC HOUR VOLUME PEAK HOIiR VOLUNIE NB PEAK HOUR VOLt1ME SB PEAK HOUR VOLtlME ES PEAK HOUR YOLUME WB 5:00-6:00 2,145 4a4 30 895 8'I6 INTERSECTION PHF PHF NB PHF SB PHF EB PHF WB 0.90 0.74 0.47 0.92 0.84 1 1 101 404 � --t G �j' �'j�= i.C� � t � �✓ t--ai t 3 --S '�- S � 3a --� F-- g � ; �b �3 '"� ,�""" 1 S ¢ � I� � F f 3� � � V Two-Way Stop Control Page 1 of 1 _ TWU-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General information Site Information nal st RP Iniersection DREW/BAYVIEW enc JCo. GCC urisdiction CLEARWATER Date Performed 9/19/2011 nal sis Year 2011 EXlSTlNG nal sis Time Period PM PEAK Pro'ect Descri tion EasWVest Street: DREW STREET North/South Street: BAYVlEWAVENUE Intersectian Orientation: East West Stud Period hrs : 0.25 ehicle Vo(umes and Ad'ustments Ma or Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R olume veh/h 762 99 22 563 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF ?.00 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 793 19 22 588 0 vehlh Percent Hea Vehicies 0 -- -- 2 -- -- Median T e Raised curb RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 2 0 1 2 0 Confi uration T TR L T U stream Si nal 0 0 Mtnor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 l. T R L T R olume veh/h 982 27 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.96 9,�0 0,96 9.00 9.00 9.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR �89 0 28 0 0 0 veh/h Perceni Heav Vehicles 2 0 2 0 0 0 Percent Grade (°/a) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channefized 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 Confi uration LR Dala Queue Len th and Level of Service pproach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Sauthbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L LR (vehlh) 22 Z17 C (m) {veh/h) E90 380 v/c 0.03 0.57 95% queue length 0.08 3.42 Controi Delay (s/veh) 9.6 26.4 LOS A D pproach Delay (s/veh} -- -- 26.4 pproach LOS -- -- D Copyrlght � 2007 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved NCS+rM Verslon fi.3 Ge�erated: 1/2012011 7:62 AM file://C:1Documents and Settuigslrpergolizzi.GULFCOAST1Loca1 Settings\Temp\u2k66.tmp 1/20/2011 PEAK HOUR / P.H.F. DATA PROJECT: 6+4Y CARE DREW ST SITE PROJECT NO: '10-033 LOCATION: 88yview Ave (NB} 3 Drew St (E-VY) DA7E: January 18, 2011 LANE TYPE: SPEED LIMIi: ^�IGNAL TIMING: � G Y R (SECONDS) (�atapplicabie) NB 2 Lene NB 25 NB � SB WA SB N!A SB EB 4 Lane piv EB 45 EB WB 4 Lane Div WB 45 WB PM PEAK HOUR COUNTS TdM�6 NB NB SB SB SB EB EB EB WB WB WB TOTAI HOURLY Pht L T R L T R L T R L T R VOLUME VOLUMES 4:00-4:15 289 4:i5-4:30 297 4:30-4:45 333 4:45-5:00 329 1,248 5:OQ5:15 348 1,307 5:15-5:30 375 1,385 5:305:45 387 1,439 HOURLY FLOW DIAGRAM 5:45-6:00 4 390 1,500 0 0 272 0 44 0 0 0 0 1,303 35 33 1,065 0 2,748 1 ? I PEAK HOUR 71ME NB NB NB SB SB SB EB EB EB WB WB YYB TOTAL 0 0 0 PM L T R L T R L T R L T R VOtUME I 1 I rl L� 5:00-5:'15 348 709 r 0 —� � 0 f— 557 5:15-5:30 375 726 —► �— 536 5:30-S:45 387 74d —+ 18 —� � 21 � 752 5:45-6:00 390 � � � 773 0 26 0 0 0 0 726 18 2'I 536 0 1,500 173 0 26 1 1 WTERSECTION PEAK HOUR 5:00-6:00 INTERSECTION PHF 0.96 39 199 INTERSECTION PEAK HOUR VOLUME 1,500 AEAK HOUR VOLUME NB 199 PHF NB 0.92 PEAK HOUR VOLUME SB 0 PHF SB �DIV/O! S� =��S PEAK HOUR VOLUME EB �44 PHF EB O.S3 PEAK HOUR VOLUME WB 557 PHF WB 0.34 ^ i�2 -- `^� �"- v <e = `G � � �� 1 � sz �-� Detailed Repart Page 1 of 2 _ ___ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ NCS+'" DETAfLED REPORT General Information Site Information Ana�yst RP (ntersection DREW/MCMULLEN Agency or Co. GCC BOOTH Date Performed 9/14/2011 Area Type All other areas Jurisdiction CLWTR/P!N CO Time Period PM PEAK Analysis Year 2091 EXlSITNG Project ID Volume and Timin !n ut EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TN RT Number of Lanes, N� 9 1 9 1 9 0 9 3 0 9 3 0 Lane Grou L LT R L TR L TR L TR Volume, V v h 271 48 398 31 62 96 204 3265 35 29 1504 245 °!o Heav Vehiciss, °taHV 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 Q.98 0.98 0.98 Pretimed P or Actuated (A) A A A A A A A A a a A A Start-u Lost Time, !� 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Extension of Effective Green, 2 0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 e Arrival T e, AT 3 3 3 3 3 3 4 3 4 Unit Extension, UE 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3,0 3.0 Filterin /Meterin , I 9.000 1.000 9.000 9.000 9.000 9.000 ?.000 1.000 1.000 Initial Unmet Demand, Q� 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Ped / Bike / RTOR Volumes 0 0 80 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 60 Lane Width 12.0 92.0 12.0 12.0 92.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Parking / Grade / Parking N D N N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N Parking Maneuvers, Nm Buses Sto in , Na 0 0 D 0 0 0 0 0 0 Min. Time for Pedestrians Gp 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2 Phasin EB Onl WB Onl 03 04 Excl, Left NB Onl Thru & RT 08 Timing G= 33.0 G= 23.0 G= G= G= 92.0 G= 28.0 G= 11&.0 G_ Y= 7 Y= 7 Y= Y= Y= 6 Y= 0 Y= 6 Y= Duration of Anal sis, T= 0.25 C cIe Len th, C= 240.0 Lane Grou Ca aci Control Dela and I.OS Determinaifon EB WB NB SB LT TH RT l.T TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Adjusted Flow Rate, v 994 132 243 32 79 208 3368 30 1724 Lana Group Capac(ty, c 243 248 521 170 173 339 3082 89 2454 vlc Ratio, X 0.80 0.53 0,47 0.99 0.4fi 0.61 J.09 0.34 0.70 Total Green Ratio, g/C 0.14 O.t4 0.33 0.10 0.90 0.19 0.69 0.05 0.49 Uniform Delay, d� 100.3 g6.3 63.8 gg,g 102.6 gg.g 47.0 �T �"2 47.4 Progression Factor, PF 1.000 1.000 9.000 9.000 1.d00 1.000 0.555 1.000 0.779 Delay Calibration, k 0.34 0.94 0.91 0.19 0. 91 0.20 0.50 0. 91 0.27 (ncrementai Delay, d2 96.9 2.2 0.7 0.5 1.9 3.3 47.8 2.2 0.9 Initial Queue Qelay, d3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Q.0 Control Delay 117.2 98.5 64.5 100.4 904.5 92.1 73.8 912.4 37.8 F F E -F F F E F D file://C:\Documenis and Settingslrpergolizzi.GULFCOAST1Local Settings\Temp\s2k96.tmp 1/20/20I 1 Detailed Report _ �� _ , Lane Group LOS Approach Delay 90.3 Approach LOS F Intersection Delay 66.4 Copyrlght C�i 2007 University of Florida, Alf Rights Reserved Page 2 of 2 , � � ,� � , i ,i <, _ __ 903.3 74.9 F E X� = 0.94 Intersection LOS NCS+T� Version 5.3 39.1 D E Generated: S/20i2011 8:37 AM file://C:\Documents and Settingstrpergolizzi.GULFCOASTiLocal Settings\Temp\s2k96.hnp 1f20/2011 P$ JECT: LqCATION: � LANE IYPE• NB SB EB WB PF11K HOUR PEAK NOUR 1 P.fi.F. DATA BAY CARE DREW ST SfTE PROJECT NO: 10-033 NcMulle�rBooth RO (NSj 8 Drew St (E-IM1� January 1 �, 201'I SPEED LIMff: SIGNAL TIMING: A 1C Y R (SECONDS) 6 lane Div NB 45 NB 40 176 5 55 6 Lane Div SB 45 SB 12 141 5 55 4 Lane Div EB 45 EB 25 25 4 215 2lBne WB 25 WB 9 9 4 230 TIME PM 4:00�:'I S 4:15-430 4:30�:45 4:455:00 5:00-5:15 5:75-5:30 5:30-5:45 5:45-6:00 TIME P6i 4:45-5:00 5:00-5:15 5:'I 5-5:30 5:3Q5:45 PM PEAK HOUR COUNTS NB NB NB SB SB SS EB EB EB WB WB WB TOTAL HOURLY L T R L T R L T R L T R VOLUME VOLUMES 1,172 1.327 1,243 '1,424 5,166 �,439 5,433 1,413 S,S19 '1,464 6,740 HOURLY FL�W DIAGRAM 1,306 5,622 — t,693 3,383 403 5,822 61 43 2,619 452 508 97 576 60 1i7 30 10,788 1 � NB NB NB SB SB SB EB ES EB WB WB WB TOTAL 233 1,432 28 L T R L T R L T R L T R VOLUME � I I � L. 1,424 A86 �— 258 —S '�. 15 �—'103 1,439 46 —+ � 59 1,4�3 60T —► 303 � � 29 -^^► 107 _ ,.� .� r r 194 3.1'10 33 28 1,432 233 258 46 303 28 59 15 5,740 194 3,1'[0 33 INTERSECTION PEAK HOUR INTERSECTION PEAK }lOilR VOLUME PEAK HOtJR VOLUME NB PEAK HOUR VOlUME SB PEAK HOUR YOLUME EB PEAK HOUR VOWME VYB 4:45-5:4fi 5,740 3,337 1,693 6D7 103 iNTERSECTION PHF PHF NB PHF SB PHF EB PHF WB 1 T 0.98 t,764 3,337 0.96 Z4S u0# �c 0.95 � ` o.sz S F = I. a j y 0.86 � { �' � 1..v..-_ � �, ��i � �s .�, 4— C�,2 G3� �t �y "� 3� S J, �1� � r 35 3zC� Two-Way Stop Control PaEe 1 of 1 - � �%�rvf.•� ..i�.ii�1JtY,tt V�l,Uhtl;':; �r�C�((3Y4:i-� ��;� 70°!J 1'd ��CCr�»7 l=ri�{.. �RI.:Y.i �..iyt��tit�. t° c..�, :� _ __ ___. TWO WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY r�< �„r.,�;°:> qa�d General fnformation Site Information nal st RP Intersection GULF TO BAY/BAYVIEW enc /Co. GCC Jurisdiction CLEARWATER/FDOT Date Performed 9/19/2091 nal sis Year 2099 EXISTlNG nal sis Time Period PM PEAK Rro'ect Descri tion East/West Street: GULF TO BAY SLVD North/South Street: BAYVlEW AVENUE Intersection Orientation: East-West Stud Period hrs ; 0.25 ehicle Votumes and Ad'ustments Ma'or Street Eastbound Westbound Mavement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R oEume veh/h 17 1265 8 3 2092 990 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 Nourly Flow Rate, HFR q8 1360 8 3 2163 204 veh/h Percent Heav Vehicles 2 -- -- 2 -- -- Median T e Two Way Leff Turn Lane RT Channelized D 0 Lanes ? 2 1 9 2 p Confi uration L T R L T TR U stream Si nal 0 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 1 a 11 12 L T R L T R olume veh/h 5 0 92 6 0 34 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.83 Q.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 Hourly Ftow Rate, HFR 5 0 12 S 0 36 veh/h Percent Heav Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 � Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 Q Lanes 0 9 0 0 1 0 Confi uration LTR LTR Dela Queue Len th and Level of Ssrvlce pproach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Conftguration L L LTR LTR v(vehlh) 18 3 17 42 C(m) (veh/h) 203 498 225 136 v/c 0.09 0.01 0.08 0.39 95% queue length 0.29 0.02 0.2a 9.21 Control Delay (s/veh) 24.5 12.3 22.3 42,g LOS C 8 C E pproach Delay (s/veh) -- -- 22.3 42.9 pproach L�S -- -- - C E Copyright 0 2607 University of Florida, All Rlghts Reserved HCS�TM Ve�slon 6,3 Generated: 1/2d/2011 8:14 AM � d 1...� f E� LOCATtON: DATE" LAN 7'YPE: N8 SB E8 WB � PFJ1K HpUR! P.H.F. DATA BAY CARE DREW ST SITE PROJECT NO: 10-033 Bayview Ave (NS) � Gulf to Bay Blvd (E-11V� Janu3ry 73. 2011 SPEED LIMIT: SIGNAL Tld[lNG: A_ ,1C, Y R (SECONDS) (not applieable) 2 Lane NS 25 NB 2 Lane 58 25 SB 7 Lane EB 45 EB 7 Lane WB 45 WS 71ME PM 4:00-4:15 4:15-4:30 4:30-4:45 4:455:00 5:00-5:15 5:15-5:30 5:30-5:45 5:45-8:00 TiME PM 5:00-5:15 5:95-5:30 5:3a5:45 5:45�6:00 PM PEAK HOUR COUN7'S NB NB NB SS SB SB EB EB EB WB WB WB TOTAL HOURLY L T R L T R L T R L T R VOLUAl1E VOLUMES 932 973 957 1,098 3,960 1,790 4,2'[8 7,276 4,b2'f '1,124 4,688 HOURRY FLOW DfAGRAM 9.133 4.723 — 39 '197 �4 0 27 12 0 66 28 3,301 25 9 4,927 274 8,683 1 ? I NB NB NB SB SB SB EB EB EB WB WB WB TOTAL 33 0 6 L F R L T R L 7 R L T R VOLUME I I I t.J r �_,. • 1,190 2,776 �— 16 � L 181 �----2,922 1,276 1,T22 —► t— 2,738 1.124 t,746 —+ g ----�, � 3 —► 1,739 — � �'133 � * �-+ � � 5 0 11 6 0 33 S6 1,722 8 3 2,738 187 4,723 5 0 11 INTERSECTION PEAK HOUR INTERSECTION PEAK HOUR VOLUME PEAK HOUR VOLUME NB PEAK HOUR YOLUME SB PEAK HOUR VOLUME EB PEAK HOUR VOLUd1E NB S:Q0�:00 4,723 18 39 1,746 z,szz INTERSECTION PHF PHF NB PHF SB PHF EB PHF WB 0.93 0.80 0.89 0.83 0.99 l t 11 16 J� _ �.�� 34 �' Cr� � � �--a �! ,..� �-- t 9:? '4��:t�� 4--- 28? a 3 � �� S o ►� TABLE 1 �eneralized Annual Average Daify �olumes for Florida's Urbanized Areas lo�Qi�o STATG SIGNALIZ�D ART�RIALS T'REEWAYS �IaSS �(>Q.00 to 1.99 signalized intersections per �nile) �nes B C D � Lanes Media�i B C D E 4 43,500 59,800 73,b00 74,400 2 Undivided 9,600 15,400 1b,500 �'** 6 65,300 90,500 110,300 122,700 a Dividcd 29,300 35,500 36,,700 *�`* 8 87,000 120,100 146,500 166,000 6 Divided 45,000 53,700 �55,300� �** l0 108,700 151,700 184,000 209,200 4,,.�_.__...._ 8 Divided 60,800 71,800 73,800 **M 12 149,300 202,100 238,600 252,500 �ree�vay Adjustments CIaSS II (2.OQ to 4.50 signalized intersections por mile) Awciliary Ramp Ianes Median B C D � Lanes Metering 2 Undivided ** 10,500 ;15,2-00! 16,200 +2a.000 t$% 4 Divided �* 25,00� i33�20Q� 3$,100 6 Divided ** 39,000 ;50�3Q0`; 53,100 ��TERRUPTED F�'T.OW flIGHWAYS 8 Divided ** 53,100 67,300 7d,900 Lanes Median B C D � Class IItIIV (more than 4.5 signalized intersections per mite) 2 Undivided 7,800 15,600 22,200 27,900 Tanes Median B C D E 4 llivided 34,300 49,600 64,300 72,800 2 Undivided *'r 5,100 11,900 14,900 6 Divided 51,500 74,400 96,400 109,400 4 Divided ** 12,600 28,200 31,900 Uninterrupted Flow Highway AdjustmenEs 6 Divided *�' 19,700 43,700 48,200 Lanes Median Exctusive left lanes Adjustment factors 8 Divided �"� 27,000 59,500 64,700 2 Divided Yes +S% Multi Undivided Yes -5% Multi Undivided No -25% Non-State Signalized Road�vay Adjustments BICYCLE MOD�Z (Alter corresponding state volwnes by the u�diceted percent) (Multiply motorized vehicla volumes shown below by numher of diractional roadway lanes to determine two-way maximwn service voliunes.) Major City/County Roadways -10% Paved Shoulder/ Bicycle Lana Other Signalized Roadways - 35% coverage B C D E o-a�% ** 3,200 12,100 >12,100 State & Non-Stt�te Signalized Roadway Adjustments so-84% 2,4Q0 3,700 >3,700 *** (Alter corresponding statc volwnes by the indicated percent.) 85-100% 6,300 >6,340 *�` * ** �` Divided/Undivided & Turn Lane Adjustments pED�STRIAN MODEZ Exclusive Exclusiva Adjustmant Lanes Median Left Lanes Right i.anes Factors (MulHply motorized vehicle volumes shown betow by number of directional 2 Divided Yes No -FS% roadway lanes to determine two-way maximu�n sen+ice volumes.) 2 Undivided IQo No -20°/a Sidewa►k Coverage B C D E Multi Undivided 1'es No -5% 0•49% '�* �`* $,000 14,400 Multi Undividod No No -25% 50-84% *'� *'� 11,300 18,800 - - - Yes �I- 5% 85-t00% *� 11,400 18,8Q0 >18,800 One-Way I+acility Adjustment BUS MODE (Scheduled Fixed Route)' {Buses in peak hour in peak direction) Muttipiy t[u correspoucling two-directional voluutes in tius table by 0.6, Sidewalk Coverage B C D E 0-84/0 >5 >4 >3 >Z ss-l00% >4 >3 >2 >1 � Valuea shown are prceeiUod as i�vo-way aunual everaga daily volwnas for lavais of serviee aud ara for tha auromobile/truck modes unless specificully steted. Althaug6 presented as daily volumcs, thcy actuaUy represeut peak hour d'uection co¢dilions tivith applicablo K and D featas epplied, This tablo dces not covseihne a atnudncd vtd sliould ba uscd only for geneml planoing npplicxtions. The computu models from tivluch this tablo is dcrivcd should be used fnr mom specific plauuing appticotioas, The tablo and deriving comptdcr modds should nat be used for corridor or intersectian desigq whcro moro rofined techniques axist Calccdatioos are based on planning applications of tho FGglnvay Capecity Manuat, Bicycle LOS Madcl, Pcdoslrian LOS Madel mul Treosit Cepncity and Qustity oFServico Manual, respectively for tho automobilc/m�ck, bicycle, pedesvien and 6us modes. � Leval of secvice foz the hicycle and pcdcstrian modes in this table ia besed on num6er of motoriud vehicles, not number of bicyolisW or pedestrians using the fncility. 3 Huses per ho�v shown aro only for the peak fiovrio thc single direction ofthe highcr haf5c flo�r. SOia'Ce: •• Can�t be achicved usu�g tabla iuput velue defaults. Florida Depu�tment of Traztsportation "'f Not a Gcable for that leLef of swice letter da. For Q�e autoino6i� modc, volwues Systems Planning Office pp gre gfcatar d�au leval of service D 605 Suwanuee Street MS i9 becamo F Ixcause intecsec�ion capecitics daw ban r�ached For tha bicycle uwde, tha laval of scrvice lettar grade (iueluding . f) u not aehievable becauso there is no maxiumum vehicta volnme thcesLold usiog table input velua defsalts. T8I18I19SSC0, FL 32399-0450 www dot s�ate fl us/plenning/syste�c/s�n/toc/defauft��htm 2009 �DOT QUALITY/LEVEL OF SERVICE HAN D800K Generalized Pealt Hour iwo-Way Valumes for Florida's TA�L� 4- Urt�anized,4reas1 �oiai�o STAT� SIGNALIZ�D ART�RIALS FREEWAYS ClflSS 1(>0.00 to 1.99 signalized intersectians per milc) I.a��es B C D � Lanes Median B C D E 4 4,000 5,500 6,770 �,300 2 Undivided 930 1,500 1,600 *�� G 6,000 8,320 10,150 I1,29U 4 Divided 2,840 3,440 3,560 *** 8 8,000 11,050 13,480 15,270 6 Divided 4,370 5,200 ! 5,360 , *�* 10 10,000 13,960 16,930 19,250 � *** �2 13,730 18,6Q0 21,950 23,230 8 Divided 5,900 6,970 7,160 • I+reewny Adjustments C18SS II(2.00 to 4.50 signalized intersectio�u per mile) Auxiliary Ramp Lanes Median B C D E Lanes Meterutg 2 Uudivided ** 1,020 ; 1,480; I,570 + F,800 +5% 4 T�ivided ** 2,420 �� 0� 3,400 6 Divided ** 3,790 ;4,880 S,I50 UNINTERRUPTED FLOW HIGHWAYS s Divided '"* 5,150 6,530 6,880 Lanes Median B C D E Class IIUN {more than 4.50 signaiized iniersections per mile) 2 Undivided 730 1,460 2,080 2,G20 Lanes Median B C D E 4 Divided 3,220 4,660 6,040 6,84Q 2 Undividad ** 500 1,150 1,440 6 Divided 4,840 6,990 9,060 10,28d 4 Aivided *'^ 1,220 2 730 3 100 ' ' Unintea•rupted Flow Higt��vay Adjustments 6 Divided �`* 1,910 4,240 4,680 Lanes Median Exclusive left lanes Adjustment factors 8 Divided ** 2,620 5,770 6,280 2 Divided Yes +5% Mulri Undivided Yes -5% MuIN Undivided No -25% lYon-State Signalized Roadwxy Adjustments BICYCLE MODEZ (Altcr corresponding state volumes by the indicnted percent.) (MidtipEy motorized vehicle volwnes siiown below by number of dicectional roadway lanes to deteanine two-way maximum service volumes.) MajOr City/County Roadways - 10% Paved Shoulder/ Bicyele Lane Othec Sigi�alized Roadways - 350�o coverage B C D � 0-49% ** 310 1,1$0 >1,180 State & 1`7on-Stste Signalized Road�vay Adjusfn�nts 50-84% 240 360 >360 *** (Alter conesponding state vol�unes by the indicafed percent.) SS-100% G2Q >620 *'�* �`*'� Divided/Undivided & Turn I,ane Adjustments pED�STRIAN MODEZ Bxclusive Exclusive Adjushnent Lanes Median Left L.enes Rigirt Laues I'actors (Miiltigly motorized vehicic volumes shown bcEow by nwnber of directionai 2 Divided Yes No +5% roadway lancs to determine fwo-vmy maxitnwn service voluinesJ 2 Undivided No No -20% Sidewalk Coverage B C D � Multi Undivided I'es No -5% 0-49% ^`�` *� 480 1,390 Muld Undivided I�o No -25% SQ-84% '�� ** 1,100 1,820 - - -- Yes -h 5% 85-100% '"* 1,100 1,820 >1,820 One-Way T�'acility Adjustmeui BUS MODE (Scheduled Figed Routej3 (IIuses in peak ha�r in peak direetion) Multiply ttae correspouding two-directional volurues iu this table by 0.6. Sidewallc Coverage B C D E o-s�°ia >5 >4 >3 >2 85-�00% >4 >3 >2 >1 � Ve6ws shown aze presented aa ho�uiy two-way volwues for lovals of sorvico and aro for tlie euromobile/truck modes u�dcss specificatly steted NHwugh prcsented es peek hour two- �vey volumes, ihey actuat[y ropresent peak haur peak dicactian conditious with an appllonblo D fuetor applied. 1Lis tab2a doas uot coustituto a stuixlazd and sl�ould be used only for senaral planaing appGcations, Tha computar nwdals fram whieh this ta61e is derived ahould 6e used for �re s�ecific planning applications. 17u table and deciving camputer �nadels shauld uot ba used for comdot ot inteaeclion desigq whe�v moro raSucd tecluuques oxisi. Calcuiations are based oa planniug applications of tha Highway Cepacity Maauel, Bicycle LQS Model, Pedeshinn LOS Model and Traiuit Capacify and Quality of Servica Manual, respectivdy for the eutomo6ilaltruck, bicycle, pedestrian ond 6�u ntodea = Level of service for the bicycle and peclesUieu modes ia this lablo is besul ou numbu of niotoriud velucfes, not numbcr oi bicyclisls orpedestrians using the �acility. ; Buses jxx houra6own ure only for �e peatc 4our iu tlw si�rok �lircction oftle hiEher ua6c Ilow. ,Soul'Ce: •• eeoao� be acwoved �s�g rebfo i�y,uc vau,e de�u�c5. Florida Deparhneut of Tra�ispoitation i0• Not appliceblc far ttwt Icvel of scrvioo kner grada. For the autamobita moda, volwnos gmator tlien level of sen�ice D Systems PlanniAg Qf$Ce becana F bxauso inte�section oapacities hare been reachcd. For thc bicyclo modq iLc lowl of suvice let[er gcade (inoludiog 605 Suwannea Stteet, MS 19 F) is not acluevabla bccauso Wcra is no maximum veLicle votume dvesltold usuig tabla input valtta defaults. TaII&i18SS06� I'L 32399-4450 www.dot.state.fl.us/plannin¢/�}}rstems/sm/los/dafault.shtm 20Q9 fDOT QUALITY/LEVEL Of SERVICE HANDBOOK Generalized Peak Hour Directiona) Volumes for Florida's TABLE 7 Urbanized Areasl �o�a��o STATE SIGNALIZ�D ARTERIALS I{'RE�WAYS Class I(>0.00 to 1.99 signatized intersections per nule) Y.aities B C D E Le�ies Media�t B C A E 2 2,200 3,020 3,'720 4,020 1 Undivided 510 820 880 **�` 3 3,300 4,580 5,580 6,200 2 D;vided 1,560 1,890 1,960 *** 4 4,400 6,080 7,420 8,400 _ .....� 3 Divided 2,400 2,860 2,940; '"�* 5 5,500 7,680 9,320 10,580 4 Divided 3,240 3,83Q 3�940 *'•`* 6 7,560 10,220 I2,080 12,780 £ree�vay Ad,justments C1R33 II (2.00 to 4.50 signrilized infersections per mile} Auxiliary Itamp J.anes Iviedian B C D E Lanes Metering t Undividecl *`� 56Q ? 810`j 860 + 1,000 + 5% 2 Diviaed "* 1,330 (1,,770j 1,870 3 Divided �* 2,080 ; 2,680 j 2,830 �Ij�jTERRIJI'TED F{LOW HIGHWAYS 4 Aivided '�`�` 2,830 3,590 3,78Q Lanes Median B C D• E Class III/IV (more ttian 4.50 signafized intersections per milc) � Undivided 400 800 1,140 1,440 Lanes Medea�i B C D E 2 Divided 1,770 2,560 3,320 3,760 t Undivided *x 270 634 790 3 Divided 2,660 3,840 4,980 5,650 2 Divided '�� 670 1,SOQ I,700 Uninterrupted Fiorv Highwt►y Adjustments 3 Divided '''* 1,050 2,330 2,570 Lanes Median Exclusivelcftlanes Adjushnentfactors 4 Divided *'� 1,440 3,170 3,450 2 Divided Yes +5% MuIN CJndivided Yes -5% Mulli Undivided No -25% Nou-Stnte Signalized Rondway Adjustments BICYCL� MODEZ (Alter coResponding state volumes by tho indicated percent.) (Miiltiply motorized vehicle voiumes shown below Uy numbar of directional roadway lanes to deter�ntne two-way maximwn service volumes.) Major City/County I2Dadw�ys - ld% Paved shoutdarl Bicy�le I.ane Other Signalized Roadways - 35% coverege B C D � o-a9°io ** 170 650 >650 Siate & Non-State Signalized Roadway Adjustments so-s4% 130 200 >200 **'� (Alter conesponding stata volumes by the uidicated percent.) 85-100% 340 >340 '�*'� *** Divided/CJndivided & Turn L.►ne Adj[�siments pEDESTRIAN MOD�� Exclusive Exclusivo Adjustment Lanes Median Le$ Lanes Right Lcumes Factors (Multiply �notorized vehicEe volwnes shown below by number of directionat 2 Divided Yes No +So�a roadway lanes to determiva two-way maximwn service volumes.) 2 ilndivided No No -20% Sidewalk Coveragc B C D E Multi Undivided Yes No -5% 0-d9% ** '�* 270 770 Multi Undivided No Mo -25% 50-84% *�' 100 600 1000 - - - Yes -f' $°/a 85-100°/a �`� b10 1�0� >10�� One-Wa F�cilit Ad ustment BUS MOD� (Scheduled Fi�ed Ro[ate)3 3' y 3 (Buses in peak hour in peak direction) Multiply tlie correspouding volwues in this tabla by 1,20. Sidewalk Coverage B C D r U-84% >5 >4 >3 >2 as-toa�i >4 >3 >2 >1 � Valces shmvu aze pcesented as l�audy dirxdoual voluma for levels of secviee and are for the autanobilrJtruck modcs ueless specificnlly stated. To couvert to annuel averege daily haffic volwnw, tLese voltw�es must bo divided by appropriata D and K ractocs. 7Lie table dpes not constitute a:teudazd aad sltould be used mily for general ptanning �plicntio�. 7'6e computer, modc)s from which tLis table is dcrived should be used for moro epecific planning npplications. Tho table eud deriving wmputer models ateould not be used Cor coeridar or iateesec6iou desigu, whera mae ro6ned techniqves exist Ca(culadons era based on pleuning applications of tLe Flighway Capacity Mentutl, IIicycie IAS Model, Pcdwlrian CAS Model a�id Trausit Cepacily end Quality of5arvico Menuat, respactive(y for the autamobiidtruck, bioycle, pedeshien and bus mades. t Level of service for tha bicycle end pedestrimt madca in this ta61e is besed ou utun6er of motorized velticics, nat numher of bicyclists or pedesUrens usieg tha facility. 3 Auses per hour sho�w ere anly for Ure peak Iwur in Uie singlc di�ection ofdu higl�x tralSc flav. SOt(7'C2: �• Cannoc be ncb;oved usin6 wbta inpur vulue detautis. Florida Deparhnent of Transportation 's• Not n licabla for thac laval of scrvica lener ade. Far thc amomo6i(a mode, volumes Systetns Plannulg Oi6Ce pp �r �tatu then level of servica Q 605 Suwatwee Street, MS 19 baewma F becnwe iuterswtion capautiw 1�aw Inxu reached For tLo bicycle modo, die level of servicc letter grede (including F) is not aahievable bacause tl�uo is no maximutn wlucl¢ volwna thteshdd itsing table input velue defnults. T811ff�1&SSee� �L 32399-0450 www.dotstate.fl.us/�lenn�i�/systems(sm/los/default.shhn 2009 FDOT QUALITY/LEVEL OF SERVICE HANDBOOK APPENDIX B _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _.. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _, �' Land lJse: 714 Corpora�e Headquarters �uilding Description A corporate headquarters building is a singfe tenanf o�ce building that houses the corporate ; headquarters of a company or organiza#ion, which generally consisfs of offices; meeting rooms;� space for file storage and data processing; a restaurant or cafeteria; and ofher service funcfions. General office building (Land Use 71�), single tenant affce building (Land Use 7'f 5), office park (Land Use 750}, research and development center (Land Use 760) and business park (Land Use 770) are related uses. � Additional Data , The average vehicle occupancy for the 10 studies for which information was submitted was approx'rmately 1.2 persons per automobile. The vehicle occupancy rates ranged from 1,03 to 1.74 persons per automobile. The majorify of the sites were surveyed between the late 1980s and the fate 1990s throughout the United States, with nearly haff conducted in the Washington, DC and Atianta, Georgia metropolitan areas. Trip Characteristics The trip generafion for the a.m. and p.m. peak hours of the generator fypically coincided with the peak hours of the adjacent street fraffic; therefore, anly one a.m. peak hour and one p.m. peak hour, which represent both the peak hour of the generator and the peak hour of the adjacent street traffic, are shown for a corporate headquarters building, Source Numbers 9, 247, 251, 262, 273, 298, 302, 303, 304, 323, 324, 327, 406, 444, 524, 552 Trip Generation, 8th Edition 1210 Institute of Transpo�tation Engineers .:� ,�. � _� Corporate Headquarters Builcling � (714) ;, Average Vehicie Trip Ends vs: 10q0 Sq, Feet Gross Ftoor Area On a: Weekday '� Number of Studies: 8 Average 1000 Sq. Feet GFA: 229 Directional Distribution: 50% entering, 50% exiting Trip Genera#ion per 1000 Sq. F'eet Gross Fioor Area Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation 7.98 5.87 - 12.39 3.89 Data Plot and Equation a,000 �,000 6,000 v G W n 5,000 F- N U t j 4,000 a� rn cti > Q 3,Od0 I H 2,000 1,000 0 ..--- : - : ._... : .- : .......: ...... : ......: ..... : .. , -.....i . . , . . . . . X : .. ......'---....X ........ : ...... ....:...... : -.. : .... -I -...-•.----...'...- .:..... ...................�..- - -.-- - --�.......;.....__, � ..... : - -- ; - - : � - - ; ��---� .:.......: ......: ..... : .... : ••••• + , X : : : , : : : 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 X= 1000 Sq. Feet G�oss Floor Area %< Actual Data PoEnts Fitted Curve °----� Average Rate ' , I i ! Fitted Curve Equatiom Ln(1� = 0.97 Ln(X) + 2,23 R2 = 0.94 I Trip Generation, Sth Edition 1216 Instltufe of Transportation Engineers � r � � I i : I i � � i Corporate Headq�arie�rs u�ldir�g (' � �} � Average Vehicle Trip Ends vs: 1000 Sq. Feet Gross Floor Area On a: Weekday, A.M. Peak Nour Number of Studies: i 9 Average 1000 Sq. Feet GFA: 272 Direciional Distribution: 93% entering, 7% exiting Trip Generation per 1000 Sq. Feet Gross Floor Area Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation 1.49 0.46 - 3.01 1.36 Daia Plot and Equation � � c W a � a� � � a� > ro rn N N 4 I I F- 1,40C 1,30C 1,200 1.100 1,000 900 800 700 600 fi00 400 300 200 100 n ..... : .. - . •� - . •- .. ,_....- , . . ...... ..... .;:.- • � ....-� .......:........�....._....._x._._....%C...�_...._. :. ... ..._...._... .... : ..... : ... . : .. ... : ...... : ..... -- � ;---... ; -�---�DC� ----- : : ' � ;� : : ; : .. - ...:...... : .... . : • --- �f'- ... _: ...... : . _ _... :...... ; . _ .. _, :...., . � ....- : � : �--.k.,. _ ._,x ...... ........ . ...... � . --..: .... ; � � . . . . . _ _ . . - . � - - - • . - . . . . - . � - . � . . . . . . . . - . - � . - . . . . � ?ZtX.'�� : : . ; , - -�--..X..x.. .r�_..�.,...---�� ..........:........:... ....:...... : ;-..... .............� `-��- �.`'- -••-:-�.X•--.•........•- � • • - -�,,..F- - - � ; . . . . . . . . - � - : • . . . . . . . . . . : . . . . . . : . . . . � - ; . . _ . . _ . . . . . . � ?E 0 100 200 300 400 500 G00 X=1000 Sq. Feet Gross Floor Area X Acival Data Potnts Fltted Curve Fitted Curve Equatlon: Ln(T) = 0.95 Ln(Xj + 0.66 Tr1p Generation, 8th Edition 1217 70Q 800 900 1000 --"-' Average Rate R2 = 0.80 Institute of Transportation Engineers _ ._ _ _ _ _ _ , __ _ . Corporate Headquarters �uiidrng (714} Average Vehicle Trip Ends vs: 1000 Sq. Feet Gross Floor Area On a: Weekday, P.M. Peak Hour Number of Studies: 21 Average 1000 Sq. Feet GFA: 279 Directionaf Distribution: 10% entering, 90% exiting Trip Generatiort per 1000 Sq. Feet Gross Floor Area Average Rate Range of Rates 1.40 0.52 - 2.67 Data Plot and Equation 1,30C 1,20C 1,100 1,000 � 900 c W fl- B00 H a� � 7OO L � � N B�O m m ¢ 50Q II � 400 300 200 100 n Standard Deviation 1.28 ....._ ... � . --�� , - �-�- , �-- _ .._... - � , ��- .'.' .... , - -• .._.... -- ...� ............. ..:...x....:_ __....:....... � --...:.. ........ ' � • � , � . : ..... :.......:.... � �--- -� �- -...:..X.-• -- : - .; ......K...... ......:.......:..........�- -..:...--- •��t•-- ....- ----........:.......:......_ : : : ,'r' : : ; : : -�• ;--....: � - X;•--�'- :-�-�---;--�-• -; �-�- ; ..-• --.... ;-�--• - .... .......� ... . : .......:y�-_.-- _ ...- - . ..... ..... , ....__; .._.. � .......:...... - �-X--�- �•----:........:- - ..:.. --.:.-• --:... --• � - --� x x . . . : . ; .. . X . . . . -�- X: .' ... : ...... . ...... : ... . : .. ... :. ...... . .....• : � -- � ; �-• � ; : . : : : : :, . �X . ... ....... ....... �---.......... ......- -......_......_...... 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 X=1000 Sq. Feet Gross Floor Area X Actual bata Polnts FRted Curve Fitted Curve Equation: Ln(T) - 0.87 Ln(X) + 1.01 Trfp Generatron, 8th Edition 1218 700 800 900 1000 """'" AVerage Rate R2 = 0.78 Instltute of Transportation Engineers Detailed Repoi�t Page 1 of 1 HCS+'" DETAILED REPORT Genera! Information Site lnformation Analyst RP fnterseotion DREW/HAMPTON Agency or Co. GCC Area Type All otherareas Date Performed 1/20/20J1 Jurisdiation CLEARWATER Time Period PM PEAK Analysis Year 2095 WITH PROJECT ProjectiD Volume and Timin !n ut EB WB NB SB LT TH RT l,T TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Number of Lanes, N� 9 2 0 1 2 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 Lane Group L TR L TR L TR L TR Volume, V v h 14 885 92 19 979 8 357 2 89 4 0 27 % Heav Vehicles, °/aHV 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 4,90 0.90 0.90 Pretimed (P) or Actuated A A A A A A A A A A A a a Start-up Lost Time, (� 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Extension of Effective Green, e 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.Q 2.0 Arrival T e, AT 3 � 3 4 3 3 3 3 Unit Extension, UE 3,0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.� Filterin /Meterin , I 1.000 9.000 9.000 9.000 9.000 9.000 9.000 1.000 Initial Unmet Demand, Qb 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 Ped I Bike I RTOR Volumes 0 0 20 0 0 0 0 0 30 0 0 10 Lane Width 12.0 92.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 ?2.0 12.0 Parking 1 Grade / Parking N Q N N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N Parking Maneuvers, Nm Buses Stopping, Na 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Min. Time for Pedestrians, Gp 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2 Phasing Excl. Left EW Perm 03 04 NS Perm 06 07 08 G= 7.0 G= 38.0 G= G= G= 20.0 G= G= G= Timing Y= 5 Y= 5 Y= Y= Y= 5 Y= Y= Y= Duration of Analysis, T= 0.25 Cycle Length, C= 80.0 Lane Grou Ca aci Control Dela and LOS Determinatfon EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TN RT LT TH RT Adjusted Flow Ftate, v 96 9063 29 1097 397 59 . 4 19 Lane Group Capacity,c 317 9666 328 16&2 347 398 335 396 v/c Ratfo, X 0.05 0.64 0.06 0.65 1.74 0.15 0.09 0.05 Total Green Ratio, g/C 0.63 0.47 0.63 0,47 0.25 0.25 0.26 0.25 Uniform Delay, d1 7.4 15.8 7.3 96.0 30.0 23.9 22,6 22.8 Progression Factor, PF i.00Q 0.803 1.000 0.803 9.000 9.000 1.000 1.000 Delay Calibration, k 0. 9 9 0.22 0. 9 9 0.23 0.50 0. 91 0.11 0. ? 9 Incremental Delay, d2 0, 9 0.8 0.1 0,9 93.4 0.2 0.0 0.9 Initial Queue Delay, d3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 O.o 0.0 0.0 0.0 Control Delay 7.5 13.5 7.3 13.7 123.4 23.5 22.6 22,8 Lane Group LOS p B R B F C C C Approach Delay 13.4 13.6 110.5 22.8 Approach LOS 8 8 F C Intersectlon Delay 30.1 x� _ �•75 (ntersection LOS C Copyright � 2007 Unlversity of Florfda, All Rights Reserved HCS+T"� Version 5.3 . Ge+�erated; 1l20/2011 7:48 AM file://C:1Documents and Settingsirpergolizzi.GULFCOAST1Local SettingslTemp\s2k60.tmp 1/20/2011 Two-Way Stop Control Page 1 of 1 _ _ _ _. TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information nai st RP Intersection DREW/BAYVIEW enc /Co. GCC Jurisdiction CLEARW,4TER Date Performed 9/20/2019 nal sis Year 2095 W1TH PROJECT nal sis iime Period PM PEAK Pro'ect Descri tion EastJWest Street: DREW STREET North/South Street: BAYVIEW AVENUE Intersectian Orientation: Easi West Stud Period hrs : 0.25 ehicle Volumes and Ad'ustments Ma'or Street Eastbound Wesfbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R olume veh/h 927 20 23 595 Peak-Hour Factor PHF 9.00 0.96 0.96 0.9fi 0.95 1.00 Houriy Flow Rate, HFR 0 965 20 23 699 0 veh/h Percent Meav Vehicles 0 -- -- 2 -- -- Median T e Raised curb RT Channelized Q � Lanes 0 2 0 1 2 0 Confi uration 7' TR L T U stream Si nal a 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R olume veh/h 989 118 Peak-Hour Factor PHF 0.96 9.00 0.96 1.00 9.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 996 0 922 0 0 0 veh/h Percent Heav Vehicles 2 0 2 0 0 0 Percent Grade (%} 0 � Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 � Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 Canfi uratian LR Dela Queue Len th and Level of Service pproach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L LR v (veh/h) 23 318 C (m) (veh/h) 697 362 v/c 0.03 0.88 95%queue length 0.?0 8.51 Control Delay {slveh) 10.3 � 56.0 LOS B F pproach De(ay (s/veh) -- -- 56.0 pp�oach LOS -- -- F Copyright � 2007 Unlversity of Florfda, All Righfs Reserved NCS+T� Version 5.3 Generated: 1/20/2011 7:65 AM file:!/C:1Docutnents and Settings\rpergolizzi.GULFCOAST1Loca1 SettingslTemp1u2k6b.tmp 1/20/2011 Twa-Way Stop Control Page 1 of 1 __ _ ___ _ __ _ ._ TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL. SUMMARY General Information Site Information nal st RP Intersection DREW/BAYVIEW enc /Co. GCC Jurisdiction CLEARWATER Date Performed 1/20/201 ? nal sis Year 2095 Wl7'H PROJECT nal sis Time Period PM PEAK Pro'ect Descri tion East/West Street: OREW STREET North/South Street: BAYVIEW AVENUE Intersection Orieniation: East Wesf Stud Period hrs : 0.25 ehicle Volumes and Ad'ustmen#s Ma'or Street Eastbaund Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R oEume veh/h 927 20 23 595 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 0.96 0.96 0.96 0,96 9.00 Hourly Fiow Rate, HFR 0 965 20 23 699 0 veh/h Percent Heav Vehicfes 0 -- -- 2 ° -- Median T e Raised curb RT Channelized D 0 Lanes 0 2 0 1 2 0 Confi uration T TR L T U stream Si nal 0 0 Minor SEreet Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R olume veh/h 989 918 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.96 1.00 0.96 1.00 1.00 9.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 196 0 122 0 0 0 veh/h Percent Heav Vehicles 2 0 2 0 0 0 Percent Grade (%) 0 o Ftared A roach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 � Lanes 1 0 9 0 0 0 Confi uratlon L R Qela , Queue Len th and Level of Service pproach Eastbound Westbaund Northbound Southbaund � Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L L R v (veh/h) 23 196 122 C (m) (veh/h) 697 294 575 v!c 0.03 0.67 0.21 95% queue length 0.10 4.49 0.80 Control Delay (slveh) 10.3 38.7 12.9 La5 B E B pproach Delay (s/veh} -- -- � 28.8 pproach LOS -- -- D Copyright � 2007 University of Fiorida, All Rights Reserved HCS+T^� Versfon 5.3 Generated: 1/20I201 t 10:48 AM file://C:1Documents and Settings�pergolizzi.GULFCOAST1Loca1 SettingslTemp\u2kBE.tmp 1/2012411 Detailed Report Page 1 of 2 __. _ _ _ _ _ HCS+'" DETAlLED REPORT General lnformaiion Site lnformation Intersection DREW/MCMULLEN Analyst RP BOOTH Agency or Co. GCC Area 1'ype AI! other areas Date Performed 1/20/2011 Jurisdiction CLWTR/P!!V CO Time Period PM PEAK Analysis Year 2015 + PROJECT/ 1lVIPROVEMENTS Project ID Volume and Timin !n ut EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Number of Lanes, N� 2 1 1 1 J 0 2 3 0 1 3 1 Lane Grou L LT R L TR L TR L T R Volume, V(vph) 356 50 481 32 65 17 292 3396 36 30 1564 264 % Heav Vehicles, %HV 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 Pretimed P or Actuated A A A A A A A A A A A A A Start-up Lost Time, I� 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Extension of Effective Green, 2 0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 e Arrival T e, AT 3 3 3 3 3 3 4 3 4 3 Unit Extension, UE 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Filtering/Meterin , I 9.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 9.000 9.000 9.000 1.000 9.000 9.000 Inifial Unmet Demand, Qa 0.0 D.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 a.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Ped / Bike I RTOR Volumes 0 0 80 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 80 Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 92.0 12.0 Parking / Grade / Parking N 0. N N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N Parking Maneuvers, IVm Buses Sto in , Ns 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Min. Time for Pedestrians, GP 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2 Phasin EB Onl WB Onl 03 04 Excl. Left NB Onl Thru & RT 08. Timing G= 33.0 G= 1Z.0 G= G= G= 7.0 G= 40.0 G- �22'0 G= Y= 7 Y= 7 Y= Y= Y= 6 Y= 0 Y= 6 Y= Duration of Anai sis, T= 0.25 C cle Len th, C= 240.0 Lane Grou Ca acit , Contro! Dela and LOS Determinatlon EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Adjusted Flow F2ate, v 272 142 4�9 33 83 296 3502 31 1596 208 Lane Group Capacity, c 473 248 567 89 90 759 3420 52 2579 1062 v/c Ratio, X 0.58 0.57 0.72 0.37 0.92 0.28 1.02 0.60 0.62 0.20 Totai Green Ratio, g/C 0.14 0.14 0.36 0.05 0.05 0.22 0.68 0.03 0.59 0.67 Uniform Defay, d� 96.9 96.9 66.6 � �0.3 993.5 77 7 39 Q ? 15.9 �2 3 15, 0 Progression Factor, PF 9,000 1.000 9.000 1.000 9.000 1.000 0.354 9.000 0.754 1.000 Delay Calibratfon, k 0.97 0.17 0.28 0.9? Q.44 0.19 0.50 0.19 0.20 0.11 Incremenfal Delay, d2 1.7 3.2 4.5 28 69.7 0.2 21.9 17.3 0.5 0.1 Initial Queue D�lay, d3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Control Detay 98.7 900.1 71.9 192.9 183.2 77.9 35.7 932.4 32.4 95.1 iile://C:\Documents and Settingslrpergolizzi.GULFCOAST1Loca1 SettingslTempls2kA9.tmp 1/20/2011 Detailed Repoi�t Page 2 of 2 _ _ � Lane Group LOS F_ F_ E F F _ E D F C B ; Approach Delay 85.2 963.2 38.9 32.1 Approach LOS F F D C Intersection Delay 44.6 x� = 0.94 Intersection LOS D Copyright O 2007 Unfversity of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS+rM Verslon 5.3 Generated: 1/20/2011 8:41 AM file://C:\Documents and Settings�rpergolizzi.GULFCOAST1Local Settings\Temp�s21cA9.tmp 1/20/2011 Two-Way Stop Control Page I of 1 - ,:: ;, , . . . "� �N�.i �f{(IUIJU!�( �lU�. 'Mi:`;.. � i. ,.'-� 5�,: t /i;'%"f �� U ��.�.U�:;�i, ( . f':. �? bit-1 �:if.C:r': �'i(.� �:- �'= _..... . . . ..... .. ... _. . ..... TW4-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY �`` � �"''` � `� °f` '�►-.;, General lnformation Site Information nal st RP Intersection GULF TO BAY/BAYVIEW enc /Co. GCC Jurisdiction CLEARWATER/FDOT Date Performed 9/20/2011 nal sis Year 2015 WtTH PROJECT nal sis Time Period PM PEAK Pro'ect Descri tlon ' East/West Street: GULF TO 8AY BLVD North/South Street: BAYVIEW AVENUE Intersection Orientation: East-West Stud Period hrs : 0.25 ehicle Volumes and Ad'ustments Ma'or StreeE Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R olume veh/h 22 9396 8 3 2093 215 Peak-Hour Factor PHF 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 23 1495 8 3 2250 231 veh/h Percent Heav Vehicles 2 -- -- 2 -- -- Medfan T e Two Way Left Turn Lane RT Channefized o � Lanes ? 2 1 1 2 0 Confi uration L T R L T TR U stream Si nal 0 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R olume veh/h 5 0 12 6 0 74 Peak-Wour Factor PHF 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 Nourly Flow Rate, HFR 5 0 12 6 0 79 veh/h Peroent Heav Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Confi uration L.TR LTR Dela Queue Len th, and L,evel of Service pproach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuratfon L L LTR LTR v(veh/h) 23 3 97 85 C(m) (veh/h) 183 474 184 957 v/c 0.93 0.01 0.09 0.54 95% queue length 0.42 0.02 0.30 2.72 Control Delay (s/veh) 27.5 12.6 26.5 52.2 LOS D B D F pproach Delay (s/veh} -- -- 26.5 52.2 pproach LOS -- -- D F Copyright� 2007 Unlversity at Florlda, All Wghts Reserved HCS+rM Verslon 5.3 Generated: 1/2012011 8:46 AM file://C:\Documents and Settings\rpergolizzi.GULFCOAST1Loca1 Settings\Temp\u2kAF.tmp 1/20/2011 Two-Way Stap Contcol Page 1 of 1 Copyright � 2047 University of Florida, Ail Rights Reserved HCS+T� Version 5.3 Generatea: ��zur�u� i a:uq Hnn file://C:Wocuments and Settings�rpergolizzi.GULFCOAST1Local SettingslTemp\u2kB4.imp 1/20/2011 Two-Way Stop Control Page 1 of 1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information nai st RP intersection 8AYVIEW/DRIVEB enc /Co. GCC Jurisdiction CLEARWATER Date Performed 1/20/2019 nal sis Year 2015 WlTN PROJECT nal sis Time Period PM PEAK Pro'eci Descri tion East/West Street: S17E DRIVE B North/South Street: BAYVIEW AVENUE Intersection Orientation: North-South Stud Period hrs : 0,25 ehicle Volumes and Ad'ustments Ma or St�eet Northbound 5outhbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R olume veh/h 29 217 5 5 43 0 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 23 249 5 5 47 0 veh/h Percent Heav Vehicles 2 -- -- 2 -- -- Median T e Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 1 1 0 0 1 0 Confi uration L TR tTR U stream Si nal 0 0 Minor Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R olume veh/h 90 0 38 5 0 5 Peak-Hour Factor PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR ��0 0 42 5 0 5 veh/h Percent Hea Vehicles 2 2 2 2 2 2 Percent Grade (%} 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 1 9 0 0 9 0 Confi uration L TR LTR Dela , Queue Len th and Level of Service pproach Northbound Southbound Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lan� Configuration L LTR LTR Z TR v(veh/h) 23 5 90 900 42 C(m) (veh/h) 1560 1320 654 594 9022 lc 0.01 0.00 0.02 0. 97 0.04 95% queue length 0.04 0.01 0.05 0, 60 0.13 Control Delay (slveh) 7.3 7.7 10.6 12.3 8.7 LOS A A B B A pproach Delay (s/veh) -- -- 10.6 11.2 pproach LOS -- -- B B Copyright � 200T Unlversity of Florida, Ail Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.3 Generated: 1/20/2011 9:i2 AM file:l/C:iDocuments and Settings�rpergo�izzi.GULFCOAST�Local Settings\Temp\u2kB8.tmp 1/20/2011 r�: 7'his Instrumcn! Prcparcd By And Rcturn To: Ricardo L. Gilmorc, Esq. Salem, Snxon S Niciscn, P.A. P.O. Box 3399 Tampa, FL 33C01 00-113093 APR-18-2000 11:46Rn PINELLRS CO BK 10861 PG 2115 � �� {�� {� �� E� ��{S� � �� ,'� � �� i _ �� __, -- � _ - ,` _ ``� �i . � ' . Property Appraiser's Parcel '. � Identification No.: 17-29-I6-00000-110-0100 - - � �� .�� ` �> i �� i , �� , THIS DEED WAS PREPARED WITHOUT THE $ENEFIT OF A TITL�$EA�2CI��E' COMMITNIENT, OR SURVEY. �� ' , � - - � � , , , � , , WARRANTY DEED =. THIS INUENTURE, made as of the,� day of Iylarch, 2000�iset�yee,�iCleanvater Housing Corporation, Inc., a Florida not-for-profit corporation, �Jhi�s�.��dressls 2Y0 South Ewing Avenue, Clearwater, Florida 33756, as GRANTOR, to th� Clearvt;atei; i�ousgng Authority, a non-profit . corporate body and politic pursuant to Chapter 4��; �loriaa �fatutes, wliose address is 210 South Ewing Avenue, Clearwater, Florida 33756, �s t',3�ANT�E. �� ; �,� ��: ` Witnesseth that Grantor, for gaof� and va'�uable�consideration, receipt of which is acknowledged, grants, bargains and Sells to Grantee a11 t�he real property located in Pinellas County, Florida, more particulazly describ'ed as; � -' PAGF:,; �� - - �CC�i fiE:C:?� ,` �-J U� , ,' `, ��2 � `� — t �.� � � 3E� EXHIBIT "A" ATTACHED ��' --� �-- �� HERETO,AND MADE A PART HEREOF INl _ __ _ _ . FE[:� -_ _ .... � il.? " - - N��,• .� together with afil�en�anents„Ire�editaments and appurtenances thereto, and all covenants, conditions, RL-"v restriction�, easements� t�ghis-of-way and other matters of record. TC)T�,' (; ,• � , ,' ; . �� T"ahav� ar�d-Co,fiold, the same in fee simple forever. CK t �� I�Gh„F, ��Y, � �-- -,� �� -''-- ` �. .;-�rid_�r�ntor hereby covenants with Gi•antee that Grantor is lawfull�seized of s�i�l;la�}dY�,r�-� T; �, �fees�ila�le; that Grantor has good right and lawful authority to sell and coqvey s�id la��d; aiid�tl�8t y� � C�r�ntor liereby fully wanants the title to said ]and and wi I1 defend the same a�ains�ihe law�u�'xlaii�ts� `_; of �11 persons whomsoever. ,^� z, �� - `; ,-, � �Q� � � �� -, - � / T� \\-i j ;� T .i. v..�� ., i .` _- ^ �-- _ _ � ._ -» y; . i, m a�z� �-, .-t '" r'i � ni f�_. � � ? �=� r.n . = l' '-.�l `7 =p �� f" (TI i.� '_" ` Ti� .. ?- �r� �n � _! �- .� G'J 1- �t ��: i m ini �; �N . »i `n':_n i .,a �n 3_ i - '.:� �_� i ,.� '- _ :_ __ i � .__ - r� r .. : D ��F� � r �. � „ _... VJ 4 �� `, i� _L_' � - 1-' nl �A T �D t- � D �� r= � -r� � �xi -=+ 0 � THIS DOCO!ffiiT OR A PO OF THIS DOGD!ffiiT IS OP POOB : QIIALITY AI�ID 2�AY BE ILLEGIBLE. � ' PINEL�RS COUNTY FLR, � '' QFF,REC.BK IOB81 PG 2117 I' _. ,� . _. _ , , �� ' �� __ �-;.� _ �, � • `, , . ,� ! � . __._ .... � • i, � - . . . -�,', ,\�� .� i �XHe��IT � ; ; , , , �- � , , ,, , -- - _ ,; ,' ' �-= ► ,- ,-, . � . .._ _ _ ..._... . . , �, , , . i _ . , ,, . .. . . __ � � 1'Dso itostAust qaart�z o! th� tbrt�ast,gut�etar o! e�olion i9. i u ` lo++ri�1�iP a! rotnb• ltangs lE �aab. Lbl��p �XC�fT,�h��lfozsh I ' 80 !�t o! Wts if�t o! eh� 1tl� o! .Rsotiotr �7. �ip 2! �oaeh, M�►q� l6 �at !or rlqht-o#-way �'or.c�w �triait'1t� 11�� sast »- I tpt o! tts� 1�f o! !he lfs� o: ssd,t`�r ir.�i�i2�l,p Z! butA, � . �o u raee l�or si4ht-ol-waY lor, ayw"tsv �ivd.. a�i iXin� _ . _ . u�e bw� !a tsa.2�t�s a�o,ush►R :,lorsa�. .,�bi�ot eo �sso�al►t . lro�a ChRtt�� Oon�r�e s�- e7ult� �o�ia. hts �tii'�, and ' J�es ilarkiA' snd feai�.a-11o3��n. �bh '!a. to th� Mty o! Cl�ar- I �ratar. lar nsilisi�a,; drala�aq��l�stitlatia� and �i�aaeo� owt 4b� �e�h 10, la�t ��sd e��; fkst 10 l�at o� tlf� ltt� oP tA� � �'o! qoliott 19,� '�b+�aonip Zi .Qouth► �gs' 16 �RSt� liaal3si Coun�►, Y2ori�!%i = : . • ;. " - , ', � ;, Z -_ I ,' �, � I , ,' , � �� i i , � i i � � _ � � ' ' I _''-_ I �� `�� i � ' �i . . . . . .. � ,;�,-��., . .. . . . .. ' : �::r .. � . .