FLD2011-06022; 385 MANDALAY AVE A; 387 AND 397 MANDALAY AVE,
0
�
385 MANDALAY AVE A
Date Received: 6/1/2011 1:53:48 PM
387 and 397 Mandalay Ave
ZONING DISTRICT: Tourist
LAND USE: Resort Facilities High (30
du/acre)
ATLAS PAGE: 267A
PLANNER OF RECORD:
PLANNER: Matthew Jackson, Planner II
CDB Meeting Date:
Case Number:
Agenda Item:
Owner/Applicant:
Representative:
Address:
Augnst 16, 2011
FLD2011-06022
D. 1.
385 Mandalav Avenue, LLC
Renee Ru�L�iero Senior Pro�ect Planner, Northside En�ineerin�
387 - 391 Mandalav Avenue
CITY OF CLEARWATER
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
STAFF REPORT
GENERAL INFORMATION:
REQUEST: Flexible Development approval to permit Retail Sales and Services of
1,899 square feet of floor area and Restaurants of 6,075 square feet of
floor area in the Tourist (T) District with a lot area of 8,074 square feet,
a lot width of 74.95 feet on Mandalay Avenue (west), a front (south)
setback of zero feet (to building and sidewalk), a front (west) setback of
zero feet (to building and sidewalk), a side (north) setback of zero feet
(to building and sidewalk), a side (east) setback of 24 feet (to parking),
a building height of 32.47 feet (to flat roo fl and 3 parking spaces, as a
Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of
the Community Development Code (CDC) Section 2-803.C.
ZONING DISTRICT: Tourist (T)
FUTURE LAND USE
PLAN CATEGORY:
BEACH BYDESIGN
CHARACTER
DISTRICT:
Resort Facilities High (RFH)
Retail and Restaurant District
PROPERTY USE: Current: Retail Sales and Services of 3,800 square feet of floor area
on the first floor and six attached dwelling units on the
second floor with a total of seven parking spaces.
Proposed: Retail Sales and Services of 1,899 square feet of floor area,
Restaurants of 6,075 square feet of floor area and three
parking spaces (including one handicapped space) with a
0.987 Floor Area Ratio at a height of 32.47 feet (to flat
roo�.
EXISTING North:
SURROUNDING
ZONING AND USES: South:
East:
Tourist (T) District
Retail Sales and Services and Restaurants
Tourist (T) District
Clearwater Marina
Tourist (T) District
Retail Sales and Services
West: Open Space/Recreation (OS/R) District
Clearwater Beach
Community Development Board — August 16, 2011
FLD2010-12033 -- Page 1 of 8
ANALYSIS:
Site Location and Existing Conditions:
The 0.18-acre subject property is located on the east side of Mandalay Avenue approximately 85
feet north of Causeway Boulevard which is within the "Retail/ Restaurant" District of Beach by
Design. The site is currently developed with a two-story building comprised of 3,800 square feet
of retail on the first floor and six attached dwellings on the second floor with a total of seven off-
street parking spaces.
Development Proposal:
The development proposal is to demolish the existing building and to construct 1,899 square feet
of retail sales and services floor area and 6,075 square feet of restaurant floor area. The building
will be three stories with the third floor being mostly open and functioning as a rooftop deck.
The first floor will contain two tenant spaces with Starbuck's occupying one of the tenant spaces.
The owner is pursuing another national chain for the second tenant space. The second and third
floor will be occupied by Hooters restaurant. The proposal includes front, side and rear setback
reductions to provide for the proposed building to have similar setbacks as the existing as well as
maintain the development pattern of the existing building immediately to the north. A sidewalk
on the south side of the building connecting to existing City sidewalk will provide required
building access.
The proposal changes the architectural style from the existing to a tropical modern architecture,
which is appropriate and aesthetically pleasing for this beachfront property and complements the
tropical vernacular envisioned in Beach by Design. The proposal meets the tropical vernacular
architecture guidelines through the use of large expanses of windows, covered and uncovered
balconies allowing for outdoor seating, overhangs providing patrons on the balconies protection
from the sun, awnings and sunshades providing the windows screening from the sun and finish
treatments commonly found in tropical vernacular architecture such as stucco, wood (faux) and
horizontal siding.
Due to the location of the proposed building and the size and configuration of the subject
property, only limited parking is available. The proposal includes a reduction to the required
parking for retail sales and services from 10 spaces (based on 5 spaces per 1,000 square feet),
and restaurant from 92 spaces (based on 15 spaces per 1,000 square feet) to three spaces. The
applicant has submitted a Parking Demand Study that analyzed the available parking within
1,000 feet of the subject property.
The development proposal's compliance with the various development standards of the
Community Development Code (CDC) is discussed below.
Floor Area Ratio (FAR): Pursuant to the Countywide Plan Rules and CDC Section 2-801.1, the
maximum FAR for properties with a future land use plan designation of Resort Facilities High is
1.0. The proposal is for a total of 7,974 square feet of floor area at a FAR of 0.987, which is
consistent with the Code provisions.
Impervious Surface Ratio (ISR): Pursuant to the Countywide Plan Rules and CDC Section 2-
801.1, the maximum allowable ISR is 0.95. The proposed ISR is 0.95, which is consistent with
the Code provisions.
Community Development Board — August 16, 2011
FLD2010-12033 — Page 2 of 8
Minimum Lot Area and Width: Pursuant to CDC Table 2-803, there is no minimum lot area or
width requirement for Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Projects. The subject property has a
lot area 8,074 square feet and lot width along Mandalay Avenue of 74.95 feet.
Minimum Setbacks: Pursuant to CDC Table 2-803, there are no minimum setback requirements
for Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Projects. The development proposal includes a front
(south) setback of zero feet (to building and sidewalk), a front (west) setback of zero feet (to
building and sidewalk), a side (north) setback of zero feet (to building and sidewalk), and a side
(east) setback of 24 feet (to parking)
Maximum Buildin� Hei h�t�. Pursuant to CDC Table 2-803, there is no maximum allowable
height for Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Projects. The proposed building is 34.51 feet
(to top of building parapet).
Minimum Off-Street Parkin�: Pursuant to CDC Table 2-803, the minimum off-street parking
requirements for Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Projects shall be as determined by the
Community Development Coordinator based on the specific use and/or ITE Manual standards.
As stated previously, due to the location of the proposed building and the size and configuration
of the subject property, only limited parking is available. The proposal includes a reduction to
the required parking for retail sales and services from 10 spaces (based on 5 spaces per 1,000
square feet), and restaurant from 92 spaces (based on 15 spaces per 1,000 square feet) for a total
of 102 required parking spaces to three spaces. Of these spaces, one will be dedicated for
handicapped use. The applicant submitted a Parking Demand Study that analyzed the available
parking within 1,000 feet of the subject property. The study concluded in accordance with a
methodology established with the City of Clearwater staff that there are a total 1,040 available
parking spaces within the study area. A maximum of 744 of these spaces were occupied at one
time during the study period leaving 296 spaces available. As such, and as the study determined
that the parking demand would generate a m�imum of 105 spaces, adequate parking is available
within reasonable walking distance of the project. It should be noted that Beach by Design does
not envision the parking would be provided on the individual properties of the Retail and
restaurant District, but instead within a parking garage that would provide convenient parking to
the District. The public parking available within the Hyatt and Surfside parking garages should
help to meet the needs of this District.
Mechanical Equipment: Pursuant to CDC Section 3-903.H.1, mechanical equipment shall be
screened from any public right-of-way and adjacent properties. The proposal includes an open-
air mechanical well area on the rooftop for mechanical equipment including HVAC. As the well
is located on the rooftop, the interior of the well will not be able to be viewed from adjacent
rights-of-way. The mechanical equipment will be screened from view from adjacent property
owners by walls on all four sides of the well.
Sight Visibilit.y Trian l�es�._ Pursuant to CDC Section 3-904.A, to minimize hazards at street or
driveway intersections, no structures or landscaping may be installed which will obstruct views
at a level between 30 inches above grade and eight feet above grade within 20-foot sight
visibility triangles. There is only one existing driveway on this property accessing S.R. 60 that is
not to be changed. The proposal has been reviewed by the City's Traffic Engineering
Department and been found to be acceptable.
Community Development Board - August 16, 2011
FLD2010-12033 - Page 3 of 8
Utilities: Pursuant to CDC Section 3-912, for development that does not involve a subdivision,
all utilities, including individual distribution lines, must be installed underground unless such
undergrounding is not practicable. Electric and communication lines for this development will
be installed underground on-site in compliance with this requirement. It is unknown of the
location of proposed electric panels, boxes and meters for this development. If located exterior
to the building, to ensure views are minimized, this electrical equipment should be painted the
same color as the building. The location and potential views of such electrical equipment will be
addressed at the building permit stage.
Landscapin� Pursuant to CDC Section 3-1202.D, there are no perimeter buffers required in the
Tourist District; and pursuant to Section 3-1202.E, as the proposed vehicular use area is less than
4,000 square feet, no interior landscaping is required. Foundation plantings are not requested as
the footprint of the proposed building matches the existing along Mandalay Avenue maintaining
a cohesive development pattern along the property line not allowing appropriate area for
foundation plantings. The south building fa�ade facing S.R. 60 is not receiving foundation
landscaping as existing is a large area of landscaping between the proposed building and right-
of-way. This landscaped area contains multiple palm trees, hedging and shrubs which meets the
intent of the required foundation landscaping. A condition of approval will be included in the
development order for the applicant to landscape and provide irrigation for the open areas.
Solid Waste: The proposal will utilize three roll out dumpster for trash removal. Dumpsters will
be located along the south building facade with walls matching the proposed building and gates
meeting City of Clearwater specifications. On trash days, the dumpsters will be staged to meet
the Solid Waste Department's trash pick-up requirements.
Si na e: No freestanding or attached signage is proposed at this time. And while due to site
constraints freestanding signage is not expected, freestanding signage in the Tourist District is
restricted to a maximum height of four feet, or six feet through a Comprehensive Sign Program.
Any approval of this application should include a condition allowing for freestanding signage,
where such future freestanding signage must be a monument-style sign meeting Code
requirements and be designed to match the exterior materials and color of the building. Any
proposed attached signage not meeting minimum Code requirements will be approved through a
Comprehensive Sign Program.
Additional Beach by Desi�n Guidelines: Section C.1 requires buildings with a footprint of
greater than 5,000 square feet to be constructed so that no more than two of the three building
dimensions in the vertical or horizontal planes are equal in length. The proposed building
footprint is approximately 3,988 square feet. And while the footprin� is less than 5,000 square
feet, the proposal still meets the requirement. The project's overall horizontal plane dimensions
are approximately 68 feet along Mandalay Avenue (west), 58 feet along Causeway Boulevard
(south), 58 feet on north side of the building and 72 feet along the east side of the building,
while the vertical plane is 36.84 feet from ground level to flat roo£ Except for the north and
south building dimensions, no other dimensions are equal; thus the proposal complies with this
provision.
Section C.2 requires no plane or elevation to continue uninterrupted for greater than 100 feet
without an offset of more than five feet. As all facades of the building are less than 100 feet in
length, this requirement does not need to be met. However, the proposal does include step-backs
which would suffice this requirement if necessary.
Community Development Board — August 16, 20ll
FLD2010-12033 — Page 4 of 8
Section C.3 requires at least 60 percent of any elevation to be covered with windows or
architectural decoration. The elevations along Mandalay Avenue and Causeway Boulevard
contain windows, railings, columns overhangs and faux wood treatments covering the entire
building elevations. On the north and south elevations, where the visibility of the elevations is
limited or hindered, less architectural decoration is practical and provided. This Beach by
Design provision is a guideline that does not require relief.
Section C.4 requires that no more than 60 percent of the theoretical maximum building envelope
located above 45 feet be occupied by a building. As the m�imum height of the development
proposal is 36.84 feet to flat roof, this guideline is not applicable. However, the building
envelope is tapered and would meet this requirement if necessary.
Code Enforcement Analysis: There are no active Code Enforcement cases for the subject
property.
COMPLIANCE WITH STANDARDS AND CRITERIA: The following table depicts the
consistency of the development proposal with the standards as per CDC Section 2-801.1 and
Tables 2-802 and 2-803:
Standard Proposed Consistent Inconsistent
Floor Area Ratio 1.0 7,974 square feet (0.987) X
Impervious Surface Ratio 0.95 0.95 X
Minimum Lot Area N/A 8,074 sq. ft. X
Minimum Lot Width N/A 74.95 feet X
Minimum Setbacks Front: N/A South: Zero feet (to building) X
Zero feet (to building)
West: Zero feet (to building) X
Zero feet (to building)
Side: N/A North: Zero feet (to building) X
Zero feet (to sidewalk)
East: 24 feet (to parking) X
Maximum Height N/A 32.47 feet (to flat roofl X
Minimum Off-Street Parking N/A 3 parking spaces X
Community Development Board — August 16, 2011
FLD2010-12033 — Page 5 of 8
COMPLIANCE WITH FLEXIBILITY CRITERIA: The following table depicts the
consistency of the development proposal with the Flexibility criteria as per CDC Section 2-803.0
(Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project):
Inconsistent
1. The development or redevelopment is otherwise impractical without deviations from X
the use and/or development standards set forth in this zoning district.
2. The development or redevelopment will be consistent with the goals and policies of X
the Comprehensive Plan, as well as with the genera] purpose, intent and basic
planning objectives of this Code, and with the intent and purpose of this zoning
district.
3. The development or redevelopment will not impede the normal and orderly
development and improvement of surrounding properties.
4. Adjoining properties will not suffer substantia] detriment as a result of the proposed
development.
5. The proposed use shall otherwise be permitted by the underlying future land use
category, be compatible with adjacent land uses, will not substantially alter the
essential use characteristics of the neighborhood; and shall demonstrate compliance
with one or more of the following objectives:
a. The proposed use is permitted in this zoning district as a minimum standard,
flexible standard or flexible development use;
b. The proposed use would be a significant economic contributor to the City's
economic base by diversifying the local economy or by creating jobs;
c. The development proposal accommodates the expansion or redevelopment
of an existing economic contributor;
d. The proposed use provides for the provision of affordable housing;
e. The proposed use provides for development or redevelopment in an area
that is chazacterized by other similar development and where a land use plan
amendment and rezoning would result in a spot land use or zoning
designation; or
a. The proposed use provides for the development of a new and/or preservation of a
working waterfront use.
�/_
X
�i
6. Flexibility with regard to use, lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street X
parking are justified based on demonstrated compliance with all of the following
design objectives:
a. The proposed development will not impede the normal and orderly
development and improvement of the surrounding properties for uses
permitted in this zoning district;
b. The proposed development complies with applicable design guidelines
adopted by the City;
c. The design, scale and intensity of the proposed development supports the
established or emerging character of an area;
d. In order to form a cohesive, visually interesting and attractive appearance,
the proposed development incorporates a substantial number of the
following design elements:
❑ Changes in horizontal building planes;
❑ Use of architectural details such as columns, comices, stringcourses,
pilasters, porticos, balconies, railings, awnings, etc.;
❑ Variety in materials, colors and textures;
❑ Distinctive fenestration patterns;
❑ Building step backs; and
❑ Distinctive roofs forms.
e. The proposed development provides for appropriate buffers, enhanced landscape
desiQn and appropriate distances between buildings.
Community Development Board — August 16, 2011
FLD2010-12033 — Page 6 of 8
COMPLIANCE WITH GENERAL STANDARDS FOR LEVEL TWO APPROVALS: The
following table depicts the consistency of the development proposal with the General Standards
for Level Two Approvals as per CDC Section 3-914.A:
Consistent Inconsistent
1. The proposed development of the land will be in hazmony with the scale, bulk, X
coverage, densiry and character of adjacent properties in which it is located.
2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage development and use of X
adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof.
3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons X
residing or working in the neighborhood.
4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. X
5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the X
immediate vicinity.
6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including X
visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts on ad�acent ro erties.
SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION:
The Development Review Committee (DRC) reviewed the application and supporting materials
at its meeting of June 07, 2011, and deemed the development proposal to be legally sufficient to
move forward to the Community Development Board (CDB), based upon the following:
Findin�s of Fact. The Planning and Development Department, having reviewed all evidence
submitted by the applicant and requirements of the Community Development Code, finds that
there is substantial competent evidence to support the following findings of fact:
1. That the 0.18-acre subject property is located on the east side of Mandalay Avenue
approximately 85 feet north of Causeway Boulevard;
2. That the subject property is located in the Tourist (T) District and the Resort Facilities High
(RFH) future land use plan category;
3. That the subject property is located within the Retail/ Restaurant District of Beach by Design
and is subject to all applicable requirements set forth therein;
4. That the properties were previously developed with retail sales and service and six attached
dwelling units. All of the building containing these uses is being demolished;
5. That the proposal includes the construction of 1,899 square feet of retail sales and services
floor area, 6,075 square feet of restaurant (Starbuck's and Hooters) floor area, and three
parking spaces;
6. That the proposal includes a front (south along Causeway Boulevard) setback of setback of
zero feet (to building and sidewalk), a front (west along Mandalay Avenue) setback of zero
feet (to building and sidewalk), a side (north) setback of zero feet (to building and sidewalk),
and a side (east) setback of 24 feet (to parking);
7. That the proposal includes large expanses of windows, covered and uncovered balconies,
overhangs, awnings, sunshades, and finish treatments such as stucco, wood (faux) and
horizontal siding; and
8. That there are no active Code Enforcement cases for the subject property.
Conclusions of Law. The Planning and Development Department, having made the above
findings of fact, reaches the following conclusions of law:
1. That the development proposal is consistent with the Standards as per Community
Development Code Tables 2-801.1, 2-802 and 2-803;
Community Development Board — August 16, 2011
FLD2010-12033 — Page 7 of 8
2. That the development proposal is consistent with the Flexibility criteria as per Community
Development Code Section 2-803.C;
3. That the development proposal is consistent with the General Standards for Level Two
Approvals as per Community Development Code Section 3-914.A; and
4. That the development proposal is consistent with the Design Guidelines of Beach by Design.
Based upon the above, the Planning and Development Department recommends APPROVAL of
the Flexible Development approval to permit Retail Sales and Services of 1,819 square feet of
floor area and Restaurants of 6,075 square feet of floor area in the Tourist (T) District with a lot
area of 8,074 square feet, a lot width of 74.95 feet on Mandalay Avenue (west), a front (south)
setback of zero feet (to building and sidewalk), a front (west) setback of zero feet (to building
and sidewalk), a side (north) setback of zero feet (to building and sidewalk}, a side (east) setback
of 24 feet (to parking), a building height of 32.47 feet (to flat roo� and 3 parking spaces, as a
Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of the Community
Development Code (CDC) Section 2-803.C., with the following conditions:
Conditions of Approval:
1. That, prior to the issuance of any building permits, all Stormwater conditions be met;
2. That prior to the issuance of any building permits, all Public Utilities conditions be met;
3. That prior to the issuance of any building permits, a narrative is submitted to Traffic
Engineering describing how the project will be constructed with respect to the use of adjacent
street rights-of-way without lane or sidewalk closures on Mandalay Avenue;
4. That prior to the issuance of any building permits, City of Clearwater at the applicant's
expense will remove or relocate any water meters that have to be relocated as part of this
development including reclaimed water meters. No water meters shall be located within any
impervious area;
5. That prior to the issuance of any building permits, it is demonstrated how a scaled delivery
truck enters and exits the delivery space;
6. That prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, five sets of built drawings signed
and sealed by a State of Florida Registered Professional Engineer be submitted for review by
the Construction Services Inspector;
7. That all open spaces will be landscaped with Florida Grade #1 plant material with an
automatic irrigation system;
8. That all utilities, including individual distribution lines, must be installed underground unless
undergrounding is not practicable;
9. That electric panels and meters for this development, if proposed to be outside and in view of
adjacent rights-of-way and properties be painted the same color as the building; and
10. That any future freestanding signage must be monument-style meeting Code requirements
and be designed to match exterior materials and color of the building.
Prepared by Planning and Development Department Staff: /���
Matt Jackson, Planner II
ATTACHMENTS: Location Map; Aerial Map; Zoning Map; Existing Surrounding Uses Map; and Photographs
S: IPlanning DepartmentlC D BIFLEX (FLD)IPending casesl Up for the next CDBIMandalay Ave 385 Hooters Starbucks (C) 2011.Ox - MJ1Staff
Report 2011 08-16.docx
Community Development Board — August 16, 2011
FLD2010-12033 — Page 8 of 8
Matthew Jackson
100 South Myrtle Avenue
Clearwater, Florida 33756
(727) 562-4836
matthew.iackson(a�,mvclearwater.com
PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE
❑ Planner II
Ciry of Clearwater, Clearwater, Florida May 2011 to Present
Octobe�� 2008 to June ?O10
Regulate growth and development of the City in accordance with land resource ordinances and
regulations related to community development. Landscape plan review including: conceptLial, and
variance. Reviews and analyzes site plans and conducts tield studies to determine the integrity of
development plans and their compatibility with surroundings. Interdepartmental and zoning
assistance. Respond as a City representative to citizens, City officials, and businesses concernii�g
ordinances and regulations. Make recommendations and presentations at staff level at various review
committees, boards, and meetings.
❑ Planner I
Calvin-Giordano and Associates, Fort Lauderdale, Florida May 2005 to December Z007
Project manager for various development applications such as plat, site plan, rezoning and variances.
In-depth government agency, in-house and client coordination to ensure that the projects maintained
submittal schedules stayed within budget constraints and attained approval. Schedule and lead
project kick-off ineetings, ensure municipal project conditions were resolved, produce supparting
docuinents and mal<e site visits as well. Research and prepare due diligence reports including subject
matter such as zoning, land uses, densities, available public utilities and land development costs.
Member of emergency mitigation committee formed to prepare and mitigate for natural or man-made
disasters affecting Calvin, Giordano and Associates and local municipalities.
❑ Manager
Church Street Entertainment, Orlando, Florida September 1999 to Februa�y ?004
Supervised and managed daytime and nighttime operations of a bar and nightclub entertainment
complex including 100+ staff. Conducted hiring and training operations including security and
inventory control. Managed and reconciled nightly gross revenues as well as preparing and
delivering deposits. Assisted in taking inventory and preparing weekly inventory orders, marketing
and special events.
❑ Linguist
ZIS Army, Fort Campbell, KY October 1991 to Octobei° 1995
Maintain fluency in the Arabic language and knowledge of customs and culture as well as military
readiness for possible deployments or training operations. Co-managed intelligence gathering
operation in Haiti including coordination between multiple Special Forces units and civilian
authorities. Interpreter between U.S. and Egyptian soldiers during training exercises. Liaison
between Special Forces battalions to coordinate certification training.
EDUCATION
❑ Master of Arts, Urban and Regional Planning, Florida Atlantic University, 2007
❑ Bachelor of Arts, Urban and Regional Planning, Rollins College, 2004
��� x.,
Looking N at the subject property from Causeway
Boulevard.
Looking N at the subject properry from Causeway
Boulevard.
Looking E at the subject property from Mandalay Avenue. Looking E at the subject property from Mandalay Avenue
385 Mandalay Avenue
FLD2011-06022
e
�
����,� � 7 , � � � _ �.-��e,.....,�,,�l�►?:
� ,
�„ . � �,
_. _. q. i. !' . � � � i � i
� r� ' , a:;..;�? f
♦� ''�.''*�M- -:� `'„ � ' �=H� x � � �
"'�:,� �, _ _ _ �, � �.
� � i� „� . r" ^�-� � +
� .,,� • . - :' .� . —�.. � ' ' .�►� ��
_,,.,�,
� . ,� � ,.�., ��
�
�,�1 , ,,.�_,,�� �����t � .. _�
. ,
_ � � � � �� __ ' � '
���� �t�M� �:'��t�i�� ?�..�, � � r � � �.
�«. '* - '�' j
a � tt��� ���t� — "�"'�� �� • -'
.+� �� � � � ' ,
���.- ..� � � � � r
i". - �'�� � . �
. . . � , -�,.,� � � � .
,�
� �,,;���,
�.�F �, �j;�:..__ _ _
�`i:m= � � ,' . , ��- i
� ,. � . ' ; , � � , .y " .�.�.` �
t � � , w�° . �
�. ,� ;�,.,,: , �� _� � .,
t M' ` � �j� � � -���' J�
k ; - ; '1`' _. .yN �
� �
.�;' � *.r;,~� , .� � :.
�� - � �; � �F. :�, �`: _ ' ' : : ,�
i � :-� = � " _ , . �.,, p ,�'��tA.
�; �.. ` - K � - '�j�� .� ,,.
'�R� :` � '��R.
r � t � �. `! t ��iiY ��
��
i �� �� f: ? �,�
r . . . « r= ,, -_____ „�`� ,J�
. s'r. � t_ � G,� , YiT }�;
• i ^ ...� _._ . ��, . �, . . •
� .� �
� � ': �. . � ` . . + .-, �
� �' •. r � ��aJ
a. C �, �� Q- 'r.� .�;; 4` "� �� �7�
� � � � r"'_":'.>.. � h...ecl�++R `'�'�
r• : .
� � . .
� t�. .:� ; �� 1
'� t � C I � �� — r , . I
� �' . � rv` �
�� � �,.-
* d � �• . .. . u ��II�'� � �� /` � � + a 1 : y � Z «� � a
! . � •C,.1► , j -�p '� �� I +�4 � � � �� � x4+ + ~ � r t � �0.
` { �� � � �,
. t� �II � � ° � .c.���iaeae � _
Aerial Map
owner: . Interstate Hotels and Resorts Case:
i �
' Property
site: � 400 Mandalay Avenue
� Size(Acres):
I�t►
Atlas Page:
FLD2004-04027
10.03
08/29/15/00000/230/0100
267A
Zoning Map
Owner: � Interstate Hotels and Resorts I Case:
site: 400 Mandalay Avenue I Property
I ( Size�Acres):
�
Atlas Page:
FLD2004-04027
10.03
08/29/15/00000/230/0100
267A
,
��' ������.���
� , w,._.�"�+.�^�.r
Planning i?epartment
'100 South Myrtfe Avenue
Clearwater, Florida 33756
Telephone. 727-562-45B7
Fax; 727-562-4865
� SUBMIT ORlGINAL 51GNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION
Q SUBM(T 14 COPlES OF THE ORICINl,� APPLICATIQN - Pians and
application are required to be collated, siapfed, and foided into sets
❑ SUBMIT FIRE PREIiMARY SITE PLAN: �24t3.Dfl
f1 SUBMIT APPL{CATI�N FEE $
CASE #:
RECEiVED BY (staff initials):
DATE REGEfVEQ:
� NOTE: 15 TOTAL SETS OF INFOi2MATION REQUIRER {APf'LlCATIONS Pl.US 51TE PLAN SETS)
FT ��IR�,F TIFVF�QpI�!��Il�'?' ��]PnT �r[ '��'I'��ll�
Camprehensive Intill RedeY�elo�ment Project
(Re��ise�i fJ7/1112�08)
�PL�ASE TYP� OR PRIl�tT�
A. A�PLICANT, PROPERTY OWtJER AND AGENT tNFORMATlON: (Code Section 4-2Q2.A)
APPLICANT NAME:
MAILING A�DRESS:
PNONE NUMBER:
CELL NUMBER
PROPERTY dWNER(5):
List ALL owners on the deed
3$7 - 391 Mendalay Ave, LLC (Joseph Kokolakis, Managing I�fember)
202 E. Center S�.reet, Tarpon Spz-ings, FT, 34689
{ 727 ) 942-2211 FAX NUMBER: { 727 } 437-5708
_----- _..___._._
EMAIL: �oseph@ikokolakis.com
387 - 391 hfandalay Ave, LLC
Housn c;novaee, c:�v
AGENT NAME: Northside Engineering Services, Inc. Renee Ruggisro, Senior Projeet Planner
--.._._.. -----__.._
MAILING ADDRESS: 300 5. Be].cher Road, Clearwater, FL 33765
—. _.__ ___ .
PHONE NUMBER: ( 727 ) 443-2869 FAX NUMBER: (?27 ) 446-8036
CEL�NUMBER: (727) 235-8475 EMAIL: Renee@northsideengineering.net
B. PROPOSED D�VELC)PME�1T 1NFORMATiON: (CQde Section 4-202.A}
PROJECT NAME: 387 - 391 Fiandalay Ave, LLC PROJECT VAI.UATION: �i 1, 200, 004. Od
STREETADDRESS 385 Mandalay Ave. and 387 iiandal�y Ave. Glearwater, Fl 33767
PARCELNUMBER{S): 08-29-15-02542-OQi-0260 and 08-29-15-02592-001-0230
PARCEL SIZE (acresj: 0.185 ( 385 } �. 285 ( 387 j � PARCEL SIZE (square feet): 8, Q74 Sq. Ft. { 385 }
LEGALDESCRIPTi�N: Sae �ttached Lega2 Descriptions 8,079 Sq. Ft. (387)
PROPOSED USE(S): Retail/Restaurant
DESCRlPTlON OF REQUEST: See Attached Y3arrative
Specifically identify the request
(include number ofi units or square -- - - ------- ---- ----
f�otage of nan-residentiai use and aif
requested code deviations; e.g.
reduction in requirad number ot --
parking spaces, specific use, eto.)
C�\[?ocuments and Settingslderek.iergusonlDesktoplpianning dept forms 07081Comprehensive infili Praject (�LD� 20d8 07-11.doc
Page 1 of 8
�
DOES TI-f!S APPLfCkTiON iNVOLVE THE 7RANSFER OF DEVELOPME=NT RIGHTS (TDR), A PREViOUS�Y APPROVED PLfINNED UNl
DEVELOPtv1ENT, OR A PREVIOUSLY APPfZOVED (CERTIFIED) SITE PLAN? YES _ NO X (if yes, attach a copy of ihe appiicable documents)
C. PROOF O�' OWlVERSH(P: (Code Section 4-202.A.5)
� SUBMIT A COPY OF THE TITLE INSURANCE POLICY, DEED TO THE: PR4PEFZTY OR SIGN AFFIDAVIT AT'I"ESTING OWNERSHiP {see
page 7)
Q. WRITTEN SUBMITTAl. REQUIREMENTS: (Cor+� �ac�ion 3-913.A)
❑ Provide complete responses to the six (6} GENERAL APPLICABILITY GR ITERlA — Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail:
1. ihe proposed devetopment of #he Iand will be in harmony w�rh the scale, buik, coverage, density aad character af adjacent properties in which it
is iocated.
See Attached Narratiue
2. ihe proposed deveEopment u�ill not hinder or discourage the appropriate deveioprnent and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly
impair tl�s value thereof.
See Attached Narrativa
3. The proposed development wi(I not adversely affect the health or safety of persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use.
See Attached Narrative
4. The proposed development is designed to minimize tra�c congestion.
See Attached Narrative
5. The proposed cievelopment is cansis#ent with fhe commun'tty character of t�e immediate vicinity o€ the parcel proposed for development.
See Attached Narrative
6. The design of the proposed development rninimizes ad��ers�=.=f�,::�:Cs,'lncluding �isuef, acoustic and olfactory and hours nf cperation impacis, on
adjacent properties.
See Attached IJarratiiTe
C:1Documents and Settings\derek.4ergusonlDesktoplpianning dept {arms 0708\Comprehensive lnfill Pro}ec# (FLt�) 2Q68 07-11.doc
Page 2 ot 8
WRiTTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Camprehensive (nfill Redevefopment Pr�ject Cri#eria}
1;,7 Peovide complete responses to the six (6) COMPREHENSIVF fNFILL REC)EVELpPNtENT PROJECT CRITERIA— Explain how each criteria is
achieved, in detail:
1. The development or redzvelopmes�t is otherwise impractical without deviations from the use and/ar development standards saf farth in this
zoning district.
See Attached t?arrative
2. The development ar redevelopmenf wii! be consistent with the goals ai�d policies of the Comprehensive Pian, as well as with the genera#
purpose, intent and basic planning objectives of this Code, and with the intent and purpose of this zoning district
See Attached Narrative
;s. The developmeni or redeveiopment will no� impede the normaf and arderty deve3opment and improvement of surrounding properties.
See Attached Narrative
4. Adjoining properties will not suffer subsfantia! detrimen# as a result of the proposed development.
See Attached Narrative
5. The proposed use shaii atherw€se be permitted by ihe underlying future (and use category, bs compafible with adjacent land uses, wiil not
substantiatly alter the essential use charac#eristics of the neigl�borhood; and shali damonstrate compliance with one or mare of the follovring
objectives:
a. The proposed use is permitted in this zoning district as a.+r��ws;,r��n standard, flexiale standard or flexible development use;
b. The proposed use wouid be a signi€icant economic conirihutor to the City's economic base by diversifying the loca! economy or by creating
jobs;
a The development proposal accammodates the expansior� or redsveiopment of an existing eca�omic cantributor;
d. The proposed use pravides fcr the provision of affordabie housing;
e. The propased use provid�s for deveiopment cr redevelopment in an area that is characterized by other similar development and where a
land use plan amendment and rezoning woidd resul# in a spot land us� or zoning designation; or
f. The propased use provides for the deveinpment of a naw andlor preservafiQn of a working waferfront use.
See At�ached Narrative
Flexibiiity v�ith regard to usA, iat widih, required setbacks, height and oif-sireei parking are justified based an d�monstrated complianee with alI o#
the following design ohjecfives:
a. The prapased rfevelopment will not impede the normal and orderly aevalopment and improvement of fhe surrounding properties for uses
permitted in ihis zoning district;
b. The proposed development compiies with applicable design guidelines adopted 6y the City;
c. The design, scale and intensity of the proposed developmerrt supports fhe established or emerging character of an area;
d. In order to form a cohesive, uisuaily i�teresting and attractive appearance, the proposed development inco�porates a substanYiai number of
the €olfawing design slemenfs:
❑ Changes in horizontal building planes;
C] Use of architecYura3 details such as calumns, carnices, sfringcaurses, pi3asters, porticos, taalconies, railings, awnings, efc.;
❑ Variety in materials, colors a�d textures;
❑ Bistinctive fenestration pattems;
�] Building stepbacks; and
Ci Qistinctive roofs for,�ns.
e. The proposed developme�t provides for appropriate bGiffers, enhanced landscape design and appropriate distances between buildings.
See P_ttached �iarrative
C:iDoc�in�ents and Settings\derek.#erguson\Desktoplp(anning dept forms Q708\Ccmprehensive }nfili Project {FLDj 2008 Q7-11.dnc
Page 3 of 8
E. STORMWATER PLAN SUBMiTTAL REQUIREMEN7'S: {City of Glearwater Starm Drainage Design Criteria
Manuai and 4202.A.2'Ij
� A STORMWATER NARRATfVE MtJST BE SUBMITTEC3 Wli`H ALL APPLICAT10T�tS. All appiications that invoive addition
or modification of impetvious surface, inciuding buildings, must inciude: a stormwater plan that demonstrates compliance wiih the City of
Ciearwater Storni Drainage Dasign Cri(eria manual. A reduction in imperviaus surfac� area does not quaiify as an exemption to this requirement,
❑ if a plan is not required, the narrative shall provide an expfanation as to why the site is exempt.
❑ At a minirnun�, the STORMWATER PLAN shall include the foIlowing;
❑ Existing topography e�ct�nding 50 feet beyond all property lines;
❑ Proposed grading including ftnished floor elevations of ail structures;
CJ All adjacent stree4s and municipal storm systems;
l3 Proposed stormwaker detention/refention area including top of bank, toe of slope and outlet contro! structure;
❑ A narraiive describing the proposed storm+n�ater cantro( plan inciuding all calculations and data necessary to den}onstrate compiiance with
th� City manual.
Q Proposed sformwater defentio�/retention area including top of banu: :se of slope and outiet cantrol structure;
C] Signature and seal of Florida Registered Pro€essional Engii�eer at� ali plans and calculations.
C7 COPY OF PERMIT iNQUfRY iE3TER flR SQUTHV�iEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT (SWFWMQ) PERMIT
SUBMITTAL (SWFVVMD approval is required prior fo issuance of City Bui(ding Permit), if applicable
l� ACKNOWLEDG�M�N7 OF STORMWATEt2 PLAh1 REQUiREME1V7S {AppEicant must initial one of the following}:
5tormwater plan as noted above is inc(udsd
xG � Sformwater pfan is not required and explanation narraTive� is atfached. At a minimum, a grading plan and finished floor
elevations shail be pravided.
CAUTION — IF APPLICATiON F2EVIEIN RESULTS IN TiiE REQUIREMENT FUf� A STORMWATER P�.AN
AND NON� HAS BEEN SUBi�€IT7ED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTEE7 AND SIGNIFICANT D�LAY
MAY OGCUR.
If you have questions regarding thssa requirements, contact the City Pubiic Works Administration Engineering DepartmenY a# (727j 562-4750.
F. SUPPLEMENTAL SUBMtTTAL REQUlREMENTS: (Code Section 4-2ti2.Aj
O S1GN�D AND SEALED SURVEY (including legal description of property) — One original and 14 copies;
❑ TREE SURVEY (induding existing traes an site and within 25' of the adjacent site, by species, size {DBH 4" or greater), and locatian,
inciuding drip lines and indica#ing trees to be removed) — please design arour�d ths existing irees;
0 TREE #NVENTORY; prepared 6y a"certified arborisY', of ail trees 4" DBM or greater, reflecting size, canopy {drip lines} and condition of
such irees; �i/A Per Rick Albee — i3o T:ree Exist on Site
Cl LOCATiON MAP O� THE PROPERTY;
❑ PARKItJG DEMAND STUDY in conjunction with a request to make deviations to the parking standards (ie. f?educe number of spaces).
Prior to the suBmittai of this appfication, fhe mathodology of such study strall be appraved by the Gommunity Developmant Coordinator and
shail be in accordance with accepted tra�c engineering principies. The findings of the study wiil be used in determining whether or not
devisfions to the parking sfandards are approve�; p1ease See Pr�vided Parking Study
❑ GRAQING PLAN, as applicable;
❑ PRELIN#INARY PLAT, as required (Note: Buifdirng permiis wi11 not be issued until evidence of recarding a finai plat is provided); �T��
O COPY OF RECORDED PLAT, as applicable; N/A .....•. °`-`
G:\Documents and Setfings�derek.fergusonlDesktoplplanning dept farms 0708iCompreMensive infiA Projecf (F�D] 2008 07-11.doc
Page 4 of 8
G. SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENl'S: (Section 4-202.A)
❑ SITE PLAN with the following information (not to exceed 24" x 36"):
Index sheet referencing individua! sheets induded in package;
� North arrow;
Engineering bar scale (minimum scale one inch equals 50 feetj, an� date preparad;
Ali dimensions;
Footprint and size of ail EXISTING buildings and structures;
��ootprint and size of all PROPOSED buildings and structures;
� All required setbacks;
All existing and proposed points ofi access;
� Aii required sight triangles;
T identification of environmentaiiy unique areas, such as watercaurses, wetiands, tree masses, and specime� trees, including
_ description and iocation of understory, ground cover vegetation and wiidlife habitats, etc; Location of all public and private easements;
Location of al! street righis-of-way within and adjacent to the site;
� Location of existing public and private utilities, inciuding fire hydrants, storm and sanitary sewer lines, manholes and lift stations, gas
and water tines;
All parking spaces, driveways, loading areas and vehicular use areas;
�� Depiction by shading or crosshatching of all required parking lot intertor landscaped areas;
Locaiion of all solid waste containers, recycling or trash handling areas and outside mechanical equipment and aii required screening
_ {per Section 3-201(D)(i} and Index #701};
Location of all landscape materiaf;
Location oF all onsite and oflsife storm-water management facilities;
Location of all outdoor lighting iixtures; No Outdoor Lighting Proposed at This Time
Location of aIt existing and proposed sidewalks; and
Fioor plan typicals of buildings for all Level Twa approvals. A fioor plan of each f{oar is required for any parking garage requiring a
Level Two approval.
❑ SITE DATA TABLE for existing, required, and proposed development, in written/tabular iorm:
EXISTING REL2UIRED PROPflSED
Land area in square feet and acres;
---- _-------- --- __------._.._
Number of EXISTI�JG dwelling units; S�E SITE DATA TABLE
Number of PROP05ED dweliing units;
-- -- -- -----------
Gross floor area devoted to eacn use;
Parking spaces: total number, presented in tabular form with the
number of required spaces;
— -. ..---------- -....._____
Totai paved area, including all paved parking spaces & driveways,
expressed in square feet & percentage of the paved vehicular area;
Official records book and page numbers of ali existing utility
easement;
� - _ _ _ - ----- ---.�
Building and structure heights;
lmpermeable surface ratio (I.S.R.); and
Floor area ratio (F.A.R.) for al! nonresidential us�s.
0 REDUCED COLOR SITE PLAN to scale (8 Yz X 11);
❑ FOR DEVELOPMENTS OVER ONE ACRE, provide the following additio�al information on site pian: N/A Less Than an Acre
One-foot contours or spot elevafions on site;
Offsite elevations if required to evafuate the proposed stormwater management for the parcei;
All open space areas;
Location of all earth or water retaining wails and earth berms;
Lot lines and building lines (dimensioned);
Streets and drives (dimensioned};
Building and structurai setbacks (dimensioned);
Structural overhangs;
C:\Documents and 5et#ingslderek.fergusonlDesktopiplanning dept forms 0708\Comprehensive Intill Project (FLD) 2008 07-11.doc
Page 5 of 8
H. LANDSCAPfNG PLAN SUBMiTTAL REQUfREMENTS: (Section 4-9102.Aj
No Landscaping Proposed at This Time
❑ LANDSCAPE pLAN with the following information (not to exceed 24" x 30"1:
per Robert Tefft Landscape Comp Infill
All existing and proposed strucYures;
Names of abutting streets; Not Required
Drainage and retention areas including swales, side slopes and boi;om elevations;
�� Delineation and dimensions of ali required perimeter landscape buffers;
5ight visibility triangles;
� a Delineafion and dimensions of all parking areas including landscapinq islands and curbing;
Existing trees on-site and immediately adjacent to the site, by species, size and locations, inciuding dripiines (as indicated on required
tree survey);
Location, size, and quantities of all existing and proposed landsc:ape materials, indicated by a key reiating to the piant
schedule;
� Plant schedule wifh a key (symbol or labei) indicating the size, description, speci#ications, quantities, and spacing requirements of ail
_^ existing and proposed landscape materials, induding botanical and common names;
Typical pianting details for trees, palms, shrubs and ground cover plants inc}uding instructions, soil mixes, backfilling, mulching and
prolectiv� r77easures;
Interior landscaping areas hatched and/or shaded and labeled and interior landscape coverage, expressing in both square feat and
percentage covered;
Conditions of a previous devetopment approvai {e.g. condifions imposed by the Community Qevelopment Board);
Irrigation notes,
❑ REDUCED COLOR LANDSCAPE PLAN to scale {$'/� X 11 j;
❑ COMPREHENSlVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM appiicafion, as applicable. Landscapa associated with fhe Comprehensive Landscape
Program shall exceed minimum Code requirements to offset the areas wnere minimum Code wili not be met. N/A
Per Robert Tefft - No Comp Landscape Program App. req'd as zero setback provides no landscape
I. SUtLDING ELEVATlON PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A.23)
❑ BUiLDING ELEVATION DRAWiNG5-with the following information:
AII sides of all buiidings
Dirnensioned
Colors (provide on2 full sized set of colored elevations)
Materials
❑ REDUCED BUILDING ELEVATIONS - same as above #o scale on 8'/ X 11
J. SiGNAGE: (Division 19. SIGNS / Section 3-1806) rro siynaye Proposed At This Time
❑ All EXISTING freestanding and attached signs; Provide photographs and dimensions (area, height, etc.j, indicate whether they will be
removed or to remain.
❑ All PROPOSED freestanding and attached signs; Provide details inciuding location, size, height, colars, materials and drawing;
freestanding signs siiall inciude the street address (numerals)
f� Comprehensive Sign Program application, as appiicabie {separate application and fee required).
C! Reduced signage proposal (8 %z X 11) (color), if submiiiing Comprehensive Sign Program appiication.
C1Documents and Settingslderek.fergusonlDesl:toplpianning dept fortns 07081Comprehensive Infill Project (FLD) 2Q08 67-11.doc
Page 6 of 8
K. TRAFFIG IMPACT STUDY: (Section 4-202.A.13 and 4-801.C)
❑ Include if required by the Traffic Qperations Manager or h;s/her desie^�e or if fha proposed development: please See Pzovided
Traf£ic Impact Study
� Will degrade the acceptabie level of service for any roadway as adopted in the Comprehensive Pian.
• Will generate 900 or more new vehicle directional trip� per hour and(or 1000 or more new vehicle trips per day.
� V1411 af%ct a nearby roadtvay segment and/ar intersection with flve (5j reportabie accidents within the prior tw�ive (12) month period or
that is on the City's annual Iist of most hatardous intersectians.
Trip genera#ion shall be based on the most recant editior� of the lnstitute of Transportation Engineer's (ITE) Trip General fi�lat�uai.
The Traffic Impact Study must be prepared in accordance with a"Scoping Meeting" held with the Traffic Operations Manager and the
Plar�ning Department's i]evelopment Review Manager or their designee (727-582-4750)
Refer to Section 4-801 C of #he Gomm.fnity Develaprnent Code for exceF�tions to this requiremenY.
❑ Acknowledgement af traffic impaci study requirements jApplican# must initia( one of the following):
� �C2�C ��T���,Ct Srti�j� IS ii �CiiluBt�. Tirc SiUuj+ iiiii8� Ii3G�Uuc a SLi�Tiilla('�+ i6�iiE Gi pr�- and pust-del=e1cN��,enT levels oi scivii:e ior aii
�R roadway �egs and each turning movement at all interssctians ideniified in the Scoping Meeting.
Traffic hnpacY Study is not required.
CAUTION — 1� APPL.iCAiIt�N REVtEW RESULTS IN THE REQUtREMENT F�R A TRAFFlG IMPACT
STUDY AND NaP1E HAS BEEN SllBMtTTED, APPL1CATlON MUST BE RESUBMiTTED ANU
S[GNIFIGANT QELAY MAY OCCUR.
If you have questions regarding these requirements, contaet the City P�.�blic V1JOrks Administratian Engineering Dapartment at (727) 562-
4750.
L. F1RE FL�W GALCULATlQNSI V1lATER STUDY:
Provide Fire Fiow Caicuiations. Water Study by a FIRE PROTECTION ENGINEER to assure an adequate water suppiy is available and to determine if
any upgrades are required by the developer due #o the impack of khis project. The watsr supp3y must be abie to support lhe needs af any required fire
sprinkler, standpipe and/or flre pump. if a fre pump is required the water supply must be able to supply 950% of its rated capacity. Con7pijancs with
the 2004 Florida Fire Prevention Code to include NFPA 13, MFPA 14, NFPA 2D, NFPA 291, and MFAA 1142 (Annex H) is requirad.
D Acknawledgemerat af fire f(ow calcuiationslGVater study requirements (Applicant must mitial one of the foilowing)_
HG ��rs Flow Ca(culationsN4raier Study is incfuded. �'lease See Provided xydrant Flow Test Results
Fire Fiow Ca(culationslWater Study is not required.
CAUTtON — i� APPLECAT'IOIV REViEW f���i�i. �S IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A FIRE FLOW
GAL.CULATIONS/ WATER STUDY AND tVf3iVE HAS BEEN SUBMiTTED, APPLICATION MUBT BE
RESUBMlTTED AND SlGNIFiCANT DELAY M�Y CICCUR.
ff you have questions regarding #hese requirements, contact tha City Fire Preventian Departmenf at {727} 562-4334.
M. SfGNATUFZ�:
i, ihe undersignad, acknowiedga that al! representations made
in this�application are true and accurate to the besf of my
know��ge and authorize City representatives ta visif and
phot aph the properfy described in this appiicatian.
of proper#y owner or rspresen#ative
STATc OF FLORlDA, COUNTY OF PINELLf�
Sv✓om to and subscribed before me this ��%i'day of
A.D. 20��__ io me and/or by
�, �/,� � wha is personaily known has
producsd � � . �,. .
as identification.
w"� ' � —
Notary pubiic:
My commission expires: �+iy��',% °a�,� � j �
_ �
p.�pRY P�e
C:\Documen#s and Settingslder�k.f�rgusnniDesktoplplanning clept fonns 07fl81 ptekSensive Inf�AkRfa�j,��',LD) 2008 07-11.doc
Page 7 of 8 zt * F,�YCQ�1ra1SS10N�QQ949$32
N,' 9� EXPIRES: b�ay 3, 2014
rF�,F f�o�` 8onded Thru Budged Notary Sarvices
0
N. AFFIDAVIT TO AUTNC)RIZE AGENT:
1. Provide names of aI) property oivners on deed - PRINT fuli names:
387 - 391 idandalay Ave, LLC
2. That Q aml4ve are) the owner(s) and record tilie holder(s) of the following described prope�ty {address or general location):
365 and 387 Mandalay Avenue, Clear�y�ater, FL 337fi7
3. That this property conslitutes the property for which a request for a; (describe request)
Approvai of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Application to construct a new commerc4al
development with a loading zone on 387 Mandalay
4. That the unQersigned (has/have) appoinfed and (does/do} appoint:
Housh Ghovaee, CEO and Renee Ruggiero, Sen?_ur Project Planner - Northside Engineering Services
as (hisltheir} agent(s) to execute any peiitions or othe; documents necessary to affect such petition;
5. That this affdavit has been executed to induce the City of Cleanvater, Florida to consider and act on ihe abova described property;
6. That sita visits to the praperty are necessary by Gity representalives in order to process this application and ihe owner authorizes City
representatives to visit and phot�ra� #he property described in this appiication;
� 7. That (Uwej, the unde�ne�j�hority, hereby certify that the for�g�ing is true and correct.
- -.
aS�tK`.(. �KU,•_;
Propsrty Ov,�ner
STATE OF FLORIDA,
COUNTY OF PINELLAS
Property
Property Owner
��-
Before me the undersigned, an o�cer duly commissioned by the laws of the 5ta#e of florida, on fhis �� �" day of
_-!� P l'�__ , �(j_� �_ personaliy appeared ���i �\, � 1���,�j who having been First duly swom
f �', --- ---
De poses/ a n d s a y s t h a t h e l s h e f u l l y u n d e r s t a n d s t h e c o n i e n t s o f t h e � t� a v i t t h a t h e/ s h e s i g n e d.
1 All;�si—���L�A;! ,li';�� i. ��� �� ..�
� � �.t�ii,� `��� ..- .�
�r '
�� � �� J.�. � �'�':If
l –' ---
� t ,�i � .,..lt�[! -.-i � 1.._�; , ''? �—
�ri..� . _ . .,_ — .._�._..__'
�' 4 i�.`�� �1�, ��t?1�.� NoaryP bli 5ignaiure
(iCh L.�i ritt t._Ti3 1�l3UP� r� GCO,I'�'.
Notary Seai/Siamp My Commission Expires:
C:\Documents and Settinqsiderek.farguso�tDesk;on\planning dept forms 07061Camprehensive Infili Project (FLD) 2008 D7-11.doc
Page 8 of 8
LETTER Q F' �4,UTH O RIZAT! ❑ N
This letter will serve as auth�rization fior Housh Ghovaee
(agent Name)
with Northside Enqineerinq Services, Inc. to act as an agent for
��' 7-
��
(Property Owner's Name) �
And to execute any and all documen#s related to securing permits and
approvals for the construction on the property generally located a#
365 and 387 Mandalay Avenue, Clearwater, FL 33767
(Property Location)
PINELLAS Caunty,�-�#�#e of FL�RIDA.
Signa�efre�R oc.��t,y Owner
��� �. ��' � i�j U�-'�ill, ��j,.'�j �7"
Address of Property �wner
i;� .�:-'.�,��-r �� 3/G S=�
CityiState/Zip Code
�_------
�r.S'�'p/�f � f%a/��u1�-Ci J'
Print Nam�f Property �wner
/ F7�✓ .JL �Z/�1" "'i�
Titf e
�.� �- �t�:�_ � 2 � �
Telephone Number
State of ' t�' 'C ' The fareq�;n� ?sfstrument was acknowledge before me this � 7� day
County of l�%•LC�-5 of ��`(A��, 20�, by,1�_ itG��(c�fnt.;S , as '�� tJr- :
. _. _-.
,..,,__. .
���
who i�personally known tg� me or who has praduced
�._____..__ _�_. _..
as identification and who di (did not} take an aath.
,.
,
'��_�: � 't' i �� 'i ��1 ILC°'�1i10 � �' �
l . I>�t�t �i�- -.....
li. t�� �IU�i tt���)�t17v% r
'{� r jG ,"!Ii tt�, �t�l? r�,� -�� f - Notary Pubiic
tt� r,F��.L Ittt;ildi7fLri1Ct3trttlDrhGC�.,INC.
{Signature)
(SEAL ABUVEj
Commission # � � � � �� ��
(Name of Notary Typed, Prin#ed ar Stamped)
?#- 20 0327778 EK: 17093 PG: 1556, 11/19/2D10 at d2:47 PM, RECORDING 2 PAGES
�$i8.50* D DOC STAMP COLLECTION $14000.00 ECEN BURKE, CLERK OF COURT PSNELT�C
CpUNTY, FL BY DEPUTY CLERK: CLKDMC3
PREPARED BY AND RETURN TO:
STEPHEN O. COLE, Esquire
Macfarlane Ferguson & McMullen
625 Court Street, Suite 200
Post Office Box t669 (3375�
Cleanvater, Fiorida 33756
.�
l 1
1 4
1 i
1 1
' - _ 1 1
\` .
`, �
1 �
,, .
, , `, �, ,
�� ,,
„ �
' ,� � � -- J ,,
WARRANTY DEED ; � `, �,
�, �
� ; , ,
THIS INDENTURE made this �'day of November, 2010, between KDHW, LLC, a `-�
Florida limited (iability company, having its principal ptACe of business in the Codnt� of Pinellasf �
State of Fiorida, Party of the First Part, whose mailing address is: 10 Bay;ESplanade, C�leamdaZer,
1 L 33767, of the Coanty of Pinellas, in the State of Florida, and 387-391 MAt�'IiA,Y.;4I'�1.VENUE,
,�
LLC, a Ftorida limited liability company, Party of the Secqnd Pait; ,wl�ose mailing address is:
-. ,',
202 F.sist Center Sireet, Tarpon Springs, FL 34589, '�, l
� ,
� , "� �,
� ��
�� „
�
W I T N E�S,S E T,I-i:, ' ___
.'
`. ,
That the said Party of the Ficst P�rt, fdK az�d in consideration of the surn of Ten Dollazs
($10.00) to it in hand paid by the,said Part3� of t�ie �4econd Part, the receipt whereof is hereby
. ,
acknowledged, has granted, basgaine�ci ��sold to the said Party of the Second Part, fo�ver, the
foliowing described landj situate lyinga�d b�irig in the County of Pinellas, State of Florida, to-wit:
� ,�
� '. �
Luts 26, 27 ahd'28; B�o2tc:4 of BARBOUR-MORRe`3ei^� SUB7)MSION, according to
the �isp�or-p�at t�iereof ss recorded in Plat Book 2:,, page -a5, public records of Pieellas
�'oun�;� lorida _ ;
Suliject to �(}f l real estate taxes> restrictions, reserva!ions and easements of record.
� � , Parcel I�D: No. � 08-29-15-02592-001-0260
, ,�
,
And the said Party of thc First Part does hereby fully warrant the tiUe ta said land, and wil! defend
the same against the lawfiil ciaims of all persans whomsocver.
FINELx'�,S COUNTY FL OFF. REC. BK 17093 FG I557
TN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said Party of the First Pazt has caused these presents to be
signed in its name by 'sts Manager Member, the day anci year first above written.
Signed, Scaled and D�livered K!?HW, LLC, a Florida limited liability
in Our Prese ce: ' company
� �� �Y;-'���lj1M1ti4LL�-----����"'�^'� �S�f�.,�
rint Name r� /� � �+ � Kenoeth G. Hamiltoa, Manager Member
Print
,�
�i
,�
�,
i 1
- _ i i
� ".
_ .. `,
��
.�
,� .--
� J ���\
� � i i .
4 � ` �
i � i
. �� i +
.
-� ��� --
,',' _ _
, , ',
�, `��
, �,
.` �,
,
STATE OF FLORIDA
C�UNTY OF PINELLAS � ,
; ,;
I HEREBY CERTIFY that before tne pecsonallY appe�ed �Nt�i�'i`� G.
HAMILTON, as Manager Member of KDHW, LLC, a Florida aunited Ii��Zility cottipany, to
me [?Q personally knorvn or j ] who has produce� `; �. '. ` as
identificatioa and known to me to be the person described in �nci"; �no?execut�d ih� fpregoiz�g instru-
ment, and acknowledged the eacecution ihereaf to be his free acY and deed as �uc� manager, for ti�e
uses and p�uposes therein expressed, and the said instxumenA i�! the act aneE deed'bf said company.
, ��
, �, , ,
WITNESS my hand and off ciat seai at Clea}water ,said Gaunby a`nd State, this L1'�tiay of
November, 201 Q. � �. ` � -
, \ , ``� tJ
,
,`,�
I�otary Publ
� �Print Name
_ ` My Commission Expires:
' • '�
!' 3 R \ � /
{ � ,
� � i
� \ � �
_ — r
f _ .
�`
�{ v
4� �
i
_ � ��
A:Wri�komYkiiVwrnnf daddx
,as+ pioqry pup�c Sfa� d fiarids
aP � gMpMn O Cde
�.� �►Ay Canmisuat OD420244
p�pini PB" 9M011
I�: 2010132952 BK: 16914 PG: 2510, 05/13/2010 at �1:16 P;M, RECORDING 1 PAGES
$10.00 D LK}C STAMP COLLECTION $8400.00 KEN BURKE, CLERK OF COURT FINE�LAS
COUNTY, FL BY DEPUTY CLERtt: CLKDMO$
ll�yL, j,r�Lr
PREPARED BY & PLEASE RETURN 70:
DAV1Q BROWQER JR., ESQ.
3Q5 S. Durtcaa Av�.
C�wAr��, FL 33755
YVarranty Deed
Ttas I+�t�ru�, EFFECTIVE rNns �pqY � MAY, 2010, BetwEEta HOAitER PROAERTtES, ENG., ,', -
FoRr���r x�ww �s HONIER REALTY COMPA�tY, m F�t�ato�► Cor�u�, wtiosE aoD�ss is: 2848 �+r
WEStEVnN Dt�, Pa,ua Hnrtsat, FL 34684� HEREtN REFERRED TO AS `c�artrat", Arao 387•3.41 ', `,
MANAALAY AVENUE, LLC� A FLOft�A LIi�IfiED L446fUTY COMPANY, WNOSE AQQRESS IS: 202 EAST CENTER ,�=;;'�`.
STREEi, TARPON SPRINGS, FL 34$$9� liEREiN REFERF�O TQ AS ��RAHTEE'. �•, ��
, , ".
� , �� �
WiTN£SSEiH f1iAT iHE SA4b GRANTOR, FoR ataQ �� cot�sir�wmoN oF 'n� suM oF TEN DOLLARS (S10.OQj �� ;'
AND OTF�R GOOD AND YN.tlABLE CONSI�RATION i0 SAID GRANTOR iN }UWD PAtD 8Y THE SAID GRANTEE, THE� ,�___.'��
RECEtPi YVhiEREO� tS HERE6Y Att�MMOWt.EDGEQ, HA5 GiiAt�tTED, BAF2GAlNED AI� SOLO 70 TFt� SAID 6RANiEE, AND �__,
GRANTEE$ NEfR5 AND ASSIGNEES FOREVER, T1iE FfM.lQ1MNG �SGRIB�p LANQ, SITUATE, LYING AND BEiNG IN
PENEU.AS CikIMtY, FLORIDA, raw�r.
� , .
LOTS 23, 24, � 25, BLpC}( A, BARBOUR-MORROW SUB�IYISiON, R��1t�6 7tTTkt� i� oR
PLAT THEREO� AS RECORDEQ IN PLAT B4QlC 23, Pac� 45 c� �t►5 �F?uauC F{�� d� Pitt��tAs
COtlNTY, FLORtDA. �' +
� `�
_ `�
PRO�ftrr APt�,vse�'s P�tc�# 08t29J9510259211QOf/02�t1' _ . , ',
� "� ,
� , `„
, , � ,
AND SAtD fRNNTOR �5 HFREBY FtM1.Y WARRANT THE TiF��TO�SJiID IAND, �ND iMLl, pEFEND TliE S+4ME
AGAiNSi LAWFiJL CL4EMS � All PERSCM+iS WHOMSOEVER: �E1S US�41t+1 TNiB �ISTRt?hfEMT THE WORBS "GRANTOR"
ANd `GRANTEE" ARE USEQ F�2 BOTH SINGUTAR AND P.L1KiAt AS T�{£ CLiNFFcXT REQCIIRES.
.
't .
IN WiTMESS WHEREOF, 6RANTQR HAS NERE4J!'170 SEi �Rr4NTORS Hflt�O AND SEAL 71iE DAY AMD YEAR F(RSi
A80VE 4YfiiTTEN.
�; _
SIGNEO, SENCED, AND DEUVERED !N OUR PR�SETI(2E: R
HOMER r�R�PERTlES, INC.
W " Da , ', r.�
' �Y ,,�..
55: �t R. R�€o�R- �;� ROBERT C. HQ �R PRE�oetrr ._...�
- - cw�w�t�t
STATE OF FL'9R[99 ; ' - -+_ ,' � ,
COUMY O�Pit�Lt�S ` ' ' -
�. THE FOR�GOiNf3 iNSTRUMENT wns nC�ic�.�oc�o ae�� ME Tttts � DAY OF M1fiAY,
20tQ,�av R � 0. HQ ,as PR�StDe�rr oF HQMER Pi2QPERTIES, INC.. n F�owQn Go�ORAttoH,
WHO i5 SONd4�LY 0 ME QR WHQ HAS PROIXlGED AS
tDENTIFICAilON AqWOWl.EDGEO TO ME THAT ME EXECUiEp THE F�iEG�NG FOR Th1E PURFOSES
EXFRESSED Tt�fjE .
��L�`�f�
NOTARY FUBLiC, STATE t7F FLORIDA �AY C01�iMISSlCNI EXPiR�S:
NAt�lE:
My Serial No.: 9�
�
�r�� �„�
�,�� �
.�
i�
,�
,�
„
- _, ,
_ --,'
, ,,
'. .
��
,r
.
.,
'� ,
', ,
��
.�
.1
�
�
a
0
a`
0
`�}
a'
LE�AL DESCR/PT/ONrJ
385 MANDA�AY AVE.
�DEVEL4PMENT S�TE}
LEGAL DESCRIPTIC�N
L�TS 26, 27 AND 28, BLOCK A,
BARBaUR—MORROW SUBC�IVISfON, AC��RDING TO
THE MAP OR PLAT TNERE�F AS RECORDED IN
PLAT BO�JK 23, PAGE 45, OF THE PUBLIC
REC�RDS OF PINEL�AS COUNTY, FL�RIDA.
387 �AN DALAY AVE.
��C}ADING ZC�NE LOCATICJ��
� � •• �-
LOTS 23, 24 AND 25, B�OCK A,
BARB�}UR--MORROW SUBQIVISI�N, ACCCJRDiNG TO
TNE MAP OR P�AT TNEREOF AS REC�RDED IN
PLAT BOOK 23, PAGE 45, OF THE PUBLIC
RECORDS (�F PINEL�AS C�UNTY, FLORIDA.
p�/27/2f�11 �8:19 ,2%56?�961 �'1.��! IC UTILITIES PQ�aE �1
�� �i�'�. ► ! ����
c. � �.�_�'".�`*_../��...f'�._/�ti.✓'��-,....''
�t-1� tVI���A��
CiTY UF CLEARWA`f'�i� t PUB�iC UTfLIT1�S
1650-� ARGTURAS A�lE. N.
CL�AF�WATER, �L. 3���5
PNOi�� (727) 562-49�p
FAX (727} 562-�963
� 1 � "i� . ! � . , 1 .,
LOGAT((�N;
FAX NUMBER: ������,,�• ���� T
�ROM: � * �+G�!�
DAT�: �► Z`7 �� � TiM�: ^, �"•�► l�►
REMAR.��; � �� ���� ��
.
� ,
� �����
N��MB�R aF PACC�S (�NC�Uf�ING THtS Gf��ER Pq�� �
�512?/2a11 �8:19 ?'!75E2�9b1 PUBLIC UTILITIES P�GE @2
� �� .p }� � � �,agfi 1 F
�1� L�f f�� ..
C/2arlNc���t" � j�� � f�€ay 24,_Oi i l 17.:3 i u
U
�-t�,�.rant T�`st icivicc t`�i-cl�,r —
� , . -- .. �.
�� Crc.t�t4�l y I3IiA.N15TZ Ra } �
:,.�,��n ° I � � (a. ' � � I t� � �' I � �circ��1 Cocl�: FH�'�+`T . - a i i i..._ c� �
I ' j ' � nd � � 4 �
..
i I' ( ,� f F�=fective 1�<<t�,: �'1� T-��-2011
� l 02 T 79 ���� � �;�i���,�= U,{ I i � ,.
� . ��I�.i���r�� � � II ._ .. . ... _ . ... ,. ... �
�_. ..... . .. .� �* 1 1 0 2 i 7 � .� ,._..... .. .. .... . .
lllSt.rt}]liilU71: l��s'�.'�Fi� ,�
C'llstOt��cr- 212�S4c�2 _ I'v�1RTHSLC)T�� FT�T{;INI�L•:1t.iN�'r ,�.iEP�V[C:�S, .�
Ph�?11e numbc:r(s); T3U� 72 , a-E3-2RG9 ._. _ '
. _
�i _ �OR'I 1-t5iI7E �Nt;iNf:l?R(NG S��C#'VIC�S. tNC �
I Account� 417914. -- � - •
1�13:1 �
C:ott1�,E�nc; N,pCI�'nr�.d .�N,i r1�1�rrJain}° -,N'�„-tlts �ci� Err,� �5'4������ <<t;ntr�c� �2e�tc` lit.r�_�;ir�.-„ 7?i-?}5-�Y�l. j l'cl $_ii1 fnr� oitC ht'dr�;ar�[
��
�� � �
�.��:�'�
�
' �--`� �� .
�
�
E5127f2�21 E��:1� ?"?755?��3oi
�#�I�R�I'C �L�J�r7 fiE��' ��jg�
UTIL,TT�' C:'�7�T�1?4'�T7. 5�1�.��C'�.
F�BLIG UTILITIES
�AG� fl3
'I'i7 W�bt� :�t .�++!(ii� �'t'�r3w-c�7:
T'7oa�e cnm�let� th� f�.(:icr�R�i;� info;t�r��,tinn i,�3c:���Ji�o �+..iz�dx,Ic a. �,ydr�nt f7o��� a:��t. T`�i!� :�t;,t�T �����[ ��,c i�
���%.�'Q :c�z� �,��:�� I�s��������. �� ;t�c, �
�at[t.��.x�y 1W��n.e� ��,,,,� o R,Y.�„ �';��., �r•.�i tz �:.�...r°i n.� ��; �-�--� "�'r.5c��
1
g.`a�t� ni �,�Fdrun� �r���: ;;tt� hc. e�-yt�r�ri �y '�V�tsr .�3�pfi.,j .
��;����s�� A�!�a-��s; �e�� �4 �-��.t�,..__r-- �� . ��o�rz���r � � t . � � `�(.�.�'�
{:.'t??Ttt��'� �i+��',�,f?:Ct: ��^� r`��s�. �' {y �j � �. z- � s .`�,}'c` � ;,� � •��� �,-�- ��r-r.r^��.�rr - -
Jt..1
�`e�Q�hi�t����.znber; `�:�-�1� �-{�.�''�' �,�-�1-��t �o�#',z�) �7'�`� r �-��.. �tE'IS �r�6, ���
F�x �,��n�Qz-z ��`�-�i �- `� �� L� � ��3 C�
T�yt3x�rat �7 1„��tr�� ` . rtz-n� a.i��►n: _ .
� n� �
�� � ���� ������ �
rIy�ir-�a� �f2 i�n�a�ir�r� , , r �
�1��{} �#RtT¢7�r
���C�I'��f r'`�J �t)��i�:"�t7Lt J�%1���43[��l�+Yt.
�,���ra�f t�4 !�►q�tin�t �rifvrm�t�o�:
Si,nc:�.ee�t�
; f' /`���
, ,
,
; �
� . f -- r �v' f,
� ,�`�...� � � _ _�.
L,..� k � °� � ��
F�5!2lI2Et11 F��:19 7^7�����9c1
�
C�
� � ���t�j,�'
N
Y
cn
i�
`Nf
��� � `
r�t
�j. ��'L3 1/��
'7` �
�.^.. . ,_.. . �- .
t
�
�
tq
, `�t
b'/�C„L�����d
PUBLIC UTIiITIES P�GE �4
� ' � '1
� � i ■ +
� � �" � i
i i , � y� �
� i �
� , (
� � � �,
i ; i : �, g
' I
, �i' p
i to ' �1: .�'
i ; 4 , ,
_ --. ...... •'��c:�-at-'�— .- -- . ..-ti
* � _ ...,� .._ ; ; i t
' ' �
� I � i
l i ' ' '
l ' �
,�
� �
�
� �; ; '� : 4�
�� , e ; � ;
i ; � � 1
' �� i , ; }
il� ,r j i i ; � .QI
�
� �( , � ;� �
�;
�
; � : �� s � ; , ��,,� �..�r,r
i i i � � �' i D� ���
I 1� i i I
E t i I �
i s � � ; � h
i� f E � � I i � V�}
;� � � '� � �
i . , { . j �
7 � i � i 1 ' �
�� I : 1 ( � I � ,
1' ; 1 1 t �
i! } ; i � : V
t i �
m. �k 3 � k � , .
�'] - � , r j r
.T � � i L� �, ,
) `
��
� �
�
�
� � �
i t �'! t�. ��: � � :
_r � ,
,�' ',r �, T-
'o- � =r� �? +.� � y � �,.
A _'1, l ' V+ � f+0
�-�,_,.-.� �� I V�i7�V `�/ a� i i M ,,,�'.l.
� .. . . . -.,�-.
.�- ._. .,__._ �.� v v .
� , t � t � �
� 4 ��
'"� � I ��
`� t ��ry
'.,i � 1 ±
�...-1 ' .. � � *-4fs
} ! �, � � \
+�,�?. `{ � Q. ; I,T 4 K�
V9 K.,�{ i i) �1 i ��+,,, j H(i
.� � � ( i i �+ i
f ; � i ' `^'r'. �
i� ! I ' 1 � ��
,. , � �; �
i� I i 1 � i
E i
�° ° �{ 1 � t 4 � l
f� I i � �
7 I I i
i�.I� .,� . ! i I Irtil
� � 7 � '._�7 �
� s � , { i
I : � � ,�
�, ':� �, . i j i i
� � ! ;, �
�.`,�,.,�/ ; ,, �
,�` i � .
�I�� _
l�� ',' ; ,
���x
if, t 't
i
's '
t, ; �
� =4, i ' �
.
t`c� � ' ;
<v� '`i. a' , !t
F' i
■.i
�Gn •
� �y
. � �rC�, Lt1
`�Y
— � ,
j
1 � i�� �
' r.l \
�5t27/2�11 �8:19 7?75624961 PUBLIC UTILITIES P�aGE �5
DATE aF TE$T
S'TATI�:
R�SlC1UAL
P13QT
��ow
�'L�1N TE�T
CITY OF CLEARINATER
WATEFt b�PAFtTMENT
FSI
PSi �4' �
P51
GPM E�7
���° -�t ��U
�
��
0
�
�ri� ��
��
/l„� �j 'Ir'`�`�-'� � � � '� -�' i�l , �� �",
�
STi1MER R�QU�STI�i ,f.� 1'EST
�
���
.��.
::.
�
�
L '�Lf�{'vlt'f.�iR���I�Y° �k.3i�f��f��a�(.,a�fiy 1trl�`,
:rL�ly 13, zol l
City of Clearwater :�
Planiling & Development Review Department
Matthew Jackson, Planner II
100 S. Myrtle Avenue
Clearwater, rlorida 33756
� u`', _ i;
IZE: FLD2011-06022 — 385 Mandalay Avenue
387 — 391 Mandalay Ave, LLC.
Dear Mr. Jacicson,
Civil
I_�tnd f'lanning
Due Diligence Repores
IZr-Z.oning, I_and Usc�, Annexaeion
St�rrnw��cer �'lana�ernent
Utilicy fac:sigi7
Traffir
(�onseriir.tion Adrninistracion
Below please find our responses to the DRC comments associated with the above referenced project:
En�ineerin� Review
Prior to Building Permit:
Comments from Public Utilities:
1. Reclaimed water should be available for irrigation for this site. To verify the location contact
Milce Vacca (Public Utilities/Reclaimed WTR 727-562-4960, x7213).
NES Resnonse: Acknowledged, should irrigation be required for the site reclaimed vvater will be
utilized.
2. City Water meters and DDC should be located as close to the water main as possible. Water
equipment under over-hangs will be difficult to install and service.
�,�,^°, -.°;
,
NES Resn�nse: Per discussion at DRC tl�e DDC (and meters) will be located within the ROW to
avoid pl�cement under over-hangs and/or l�al�onies.
3. Existing water main very deep, and wet. Other Utilities are crowded in with our water main.
This will need to be de-watered along with a trench box by contractor.
NES Resnonse: We hereby aci�nowledge the existing water mains are deep and wet requiring de-
watering and a trench box. Please see Note on Civil Sheet C41.
4. What size are the three water meters coming ofFthe two inch service line?
NES Response: Please see Civil Sheet C4.1 for the proposed meter sizes associated with the
project.
30(� Soi.itli E3r-lnc�r• Ro�i�l
CIG;�trwr:rr.f.>.i; F�Ic�rid,x 3:�76�i
r.c.e.l� ct iinrtltside�.=.r��;inrc,i�in�;s�i-vict:s.coin
�l �% 4�G� �. �/Y�I�fii E'""]*1 ! I I �il��\ t51 i�f'�
1
En�ineerin� Review
Prior to Bt�ilding Permit:
1. The City of Clearwater, at the applicants expense.will remove or relocate a11y water meters that have to
be_relocated as part of this development incl�.iding rerl�imed water meters. No meters shall be located.
within any irnpervious areas. ,
NES Response: Acknowledged, applicants is r�sponsible to remove or relocate any water meters
that have to be relocated as part of this deve��ap�ent including reclaimed water meters and further
acicnowledge, meters shall not be located vvitliin impervious areas. Please see note added to revised
Civil Sheet C4.1 �� �
Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy:
1. Applicant shall submit 5 sets of as built drawings that are signed and sealed by a State of Florida
Registered Professional Engineer. The Construction Services Inspector will field inspect as built
drawings for accuracy.
NES Response: Acknowledged.
Environmental Review
1. DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may be forthcoming
upon submittal of a Building Permit Application.
Please Note: An asbestos Survey is usually required prior to conducting any demolition or
renovations. Please contact Pinellas County Air Quality (464-4422) for further information.
NES Response: Acicnowledged, addition�l comments may be forthcoming based upon submittal
of a Building Permit Application and asbestos survey will be required the proposed demolition and/or
renovations.
Fire Review
1. Plan shows the dumpster less than 10' feet from,e�clr of the building(s) meeting on June 20, 2011 with
JW Smith Archiiect will malce this a two (2) �,�i'aur�separation with fire sprinkler system designed into it.
ARCHITECT Response: Dumpster encl�saure to be 2 hr. rated covered with a roof and sprinlcled.
2
�_�::
2.� Plai� shows the f`ire depai-�ment connection. and the fire hydrant, an additional hydi�ant will be reqi�ired
wi�hin 300' on the same side of the street. ACKNOtiVLEDGE PRI�3R TO CDI3
NES Response: Acknowledgecl, a second hydr�nt exists within approx. 160' of the proposed
building and is locateci within the ROW in front of t}ie neighboring development to the east; please
see revised Civil Sheet C4.1 for the location of the second hydrant.
3. Note from Engineering Review #3 indicates that this will require a trench box and de-watering because
the existing water main is deep. You will be require.d to meet the City Ordinance No. 7918-08 along
with the Florida Trench Safety Act Sections 553.60-553.64, Florida State Statutes and the provisions of
the Occupational Safety and Health Administration's (OSHA) Excavation safety standards, 29 C.F.R.'s
1926.650 Subparagraph P, or current revisions of these laws and have a separate permit for Trenching
for an inspection by the Clearwater L'ire Department �iivision of Fire Prevention Services.
i�T�S tcesponse: Aeicnowiedgeci, piease see note �dded io reviseci i:ivii �heet �`4.1
Land Resources
1. Reroute t17e water and sanitary lines to be at least 5' away from the palm trees.
NES Resnonse: Please note added to Civil Sheet C4.1 indicating water and sanitary lines shall be
located 5' from any Palm trees; please note existing sanitary line is within approx. 1S' of the existing
trees.
ning Review (Items 1-7 Require
For the purposes of verifying the gross floor,�rea of 7,450 reflected in the site plan data table, provide a
detailed chart showing the gross floor calculations, per floor and also per use, including revised floor
plans showing all dimensions. Once the correct gross floor area has been calculated, additional
comments may be necessary.
NES and Architect Resnonse: Please see chart provided within the revised narrative as per your
request indicating gross f7oor calculations, per floor and per use; the same chart is included within
Architectural plan. All information (Site Data �Table, Narrative and Architectural plans) is
coordinated.
2. In the subrnittal narrative, and once the square footage's for each tenant space/use has been determined,
provide all the square footage's not just the retail space and Starbucics. The IIooter's square footage was
not annotated.
NES Response: Please see revised narrative which includes a chart providing all square footages.
3. Pursuant to the bullc guidelines of Beach by Design, ��ew development is to el7sure aesthetically pleasing
architecture in a tropical vernacular. Provide phol:ographic and written evidence how the proposed
developments possesses a tropical vernacular architec;ture.
Architect Response: See Photo Collage with Narrative Prepared and Provided by Architect
4. Show on the plans the location oF any ouidoor mechanical equipment such as air conditioning
condensers. Pursuant to Community Development Code Section 3-903.II.2., if inechanical equipment is
viewable From adjacent rights of way or properties, it must be screened from view.
Architect Response: We are now showing on the floorplans general locations for mechanica]
equipment and it is screened irom view using wells �ncl parapets
. :.t ��..
5. Pursiian�t to CDC Section 3-912, far devel��pment �that does not involve a subdivision, all ulilities,
incluciing indivicival distribution iines, must ue installed underground unless such undergrounding is not
prac�ical. As such, add a note to the pl�ns that new Lrtility lines such as electrical and utility shall be
installed underground. The electric panels and meters far this development, if proposed to be outside
and in view of adjacent rights of way ar properties, will be painted th�- same color as the building.
NES Resnonse: Please see note added to Civil Sheet C4.1 "Pursuant to CDC Section 3-912, for
development that does not involve a subdivision, all utilities, including individual distribution lines,
must be installed underground unless such undergrounding is not practical".
Architect Response: The electric p�nels and meters for this development, if proposed to be outside
and in view of adjacent rights of way or properties, will be painted the same color as the building, see
note added to Sheet PRE-1 - It will be noted on the final construction documents - probably sheet A-2.
6. While a cornprehensive landscape plan application is not being required for this development, provide
landscaping for the open areas such as the triangttlar space immediately to the north of the handicapped
parlcing space and the open space at the bottom of the stairwell on the east side of the building. Use
Florida native plant material and depending on the plant material chose, irrigation may be required.
NES Resnonse: Please see revised Civil Sheet C3.1 providing a note indicating Florida Native and
Drought Tolerant ground cover and/or plantings shall be located within all open areas. A formal
landscape plan will be provided at time of Permit subrnission for review, comment and/or apProval
by the City.
7. Provide clarification if the Hooters maintenance hall will be open for access to the public. If not,
handicapped individuals parking on the east side of the building will be required to travel throngh the
retail store, bacic out onto the public sidewallc to eventually gain access to the elevator.
NES Resnonse: The maintenance hall is inte�a�ei�=`�'or employee use only and will serve as a service
hall for trash and deliveries. All persons util'�;ng the parl�ing spaces to the rear of the building will
be required to use the public sidewalk along t�Ye south to gain access to Mandalay Avenue.
�
c.�lt:::�:.<..,.• .
8. This condition is being inchtded as a courtesy�:�nd For yoiu- reference from the ]3uilding Depar�inent, As
tl�e subject property is located in an AR l�lor�d zone, provide details how the ground floor construction
� will be rnediated to ineet I'�AM requireir.�nts.
Architect Response: The floor slab is to be of a grfater thicicness (to be determinecl by structural
engineering drawings) for bYioy�ncy. The storefront is engineered to meet floocl requirements which
will be large missile impact rated, and have sealed calculations for flood resistance as well as Florida
Procluct Approval numbers and/or Miami-Dade Notice of Acceptance. The product website is
http://www.glassfloodbarriers.com/ - all entry doors will have additional, removable, site stored
floodgates.
9. This conciition is being included as a courtesy and for your reference froin the Building Department.
Refer to 2007 plumbing code for the appropriate f xture counts per the floor area proposed.
Architect itesponse: We are i�ying oui iixtures in accordance witn use and occupancy:
Solid W�ste Revlew Solid Waste Condition per Mike Pryor
1. The Durnpster enclosure will need to be redesigned as it will not fiinction as proposed.
NES Response: Please see plans for revised dumpster location and sizing as per discussions with
Mike Pryor.
Stormwater Review
The following shall be �ddressed prior to Comm�nat� �evelopment Board:
;,,;�_.
Please address City's stormwater redevelopment re�uirements.
NES Response: As agreed upon, A�iplication for Payment in of Lieu of Retention will be made
prior to issuance of building permit; the City has calculated $21,020.00 as the amount due.
The following shall be addressed pr�or to issuance of the Building Permit:
l. Submit 4 copies of the approved SWFWMD permit.
NES Resnonse: Acicnowledged, 4 copies of the approved SWFWMD permit shall be provided
upon receipt.
2. Provide a roof runoff collection system on the plan and show that it collects and routes runoff to a
retention pond for attenuation and treatment prior to discharging off site.
NES Res�onse: Acicnowledged, pl�ns will be revised to inclnde connection to the City system to
c�►pture water from downspouts.
5
Traf�c En�ineering Revlew Prior to review by the Community Development Boarcl:
Accessible parking space shall have a vertical clear height of 8'2" per F'lorida Building Code
Chapter 11, Section 11-4.6.5.
NES Resnonse: Please see note added to revised Civil Sheet C3.1 stating: Accessible parlcing space
shall have a vertical clear height of 8'2"; the design (architectural and civil) meets this requirement - there is
a clear headspace of 10'-0" now shown on plans and elevations.
2. Demonstrate how a scaled delivery trucic enters and exits the delivery space.
NES Response: A new 12' x 35' loacling are� is provided on the adjacent site to the nortli and is
commonly owned; the location is intended to serve BOTH sites as the site to the north cYYrrently loads
from Mandalay Avenue.
The loading area is accessible from the existing curb cut (Ingress/Egress driveway) of the proposed
development and will provide a loading are�,,��!f��� off the rights of way in lieu of loading on the
Mandalay ROW. We have provided �t ��'ru�ck 'Curning Sheet within this submission which
demonstrates the ingress/egress path for a�el� very trucic.
We trust this information is sufficient to respond to the DRC comment� and will allow the project to move
forward to the Community Development Board. Any additional items ean and will be addressed at time of
Building Permit Application.
Please feel free to contact Lts if you have questions or require additional information.
Sincerely,
��,,., ��
. � � r � ��� .�--..
� ,.._ o �
` Renee Ru iero Senior P�i�
�.r ., .��..._..__,_._.��-
gg , ro ect Planner
Northside Engineering Services, Inc.
. 'vh��
�4.
�
, �
)yp py 2�9�v,�9gg N'�I� ynp /) y
� .eE`A�i✓}dY6'f�'4l"bLG�S'4�,/%' � W�S'I.���K�E:��N.�' �1F`.C�'�A1>
f .;
387 - 391 MANnALaY AvE, LLC
PROPOSED RESTAURANT/RETAIL DEVELOPMENT
385 MANDALAY AVENUE
NARRATIVE
Description of Request
Civil
Land Planning
Gue Giligence Reports
I�G-�f?i11V1�,(_ancJ Use,Annexation
St:arrnwat:er Management
Utility C�esign
Traffic
C�nstruccion /�drninist:ration
The Applicant 387 — 391 Mandalay Ave, LLC. proposes to redevelop the site with a two
story restaurant and retail development. The subject 0.185 acre site is� comprised of three
lots and is bounded by Mandalay Avenue to the west, Clearwater Beach/State Road 60
Roundabout to the south, with commercial developments to the north and east. The site
is located within the Retail and Restaurant District of Beach by Design.
Specifically, the Applicant requests flexil�le'development approval to allow the retail and
restaurant development with:
a. a Lot Area of b.18 acres (8,074 square feet);
b. a Lot Width of 74.95' along Mandalay Avenue and 108.10' along
State Road 60 Roundabout;
c. a maximum Building Height (above BFE) of 32.47' to the roof deck
and 36.84' to the parapet;
d. an F.A.R. of 0.987
e. an LS.R. of 0.95
f. a front (West) setback along Mandalay Avenue 3.8' to building , 3.2'
over ROW to canopy and zero to pavement and column;
g. a front (South) setback along State Road 60 Roundabout of 2.9' to
building, 3.2' over ROW to canopy and zero to pavement and column;
h. a side (North) interior setback of zero' building, balcony and
dumpster enclosure;
i. an (East) side setback of 39.6' to the building, 25' to the stairwell,
23.8' to dumpster enclosure and zero to parlcing lot pavement;
j. Providing 3 Parking Spaces;
k. Flexibility to the minimum standards for the Sight Visibility Triangle
at the southwest corner adjacent to Mandalay Ave and State Road 60
Roundabout ROW;
as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-
803.0 of the Development Code.
�
+ . �
300 Sc>ueh Beleht:r Ro<rcl
CIC7rw��ter, l=fc�rirJ�� :3:3�7i,.5
tech�nr,�rtl3sirle��r��;inE.�ringse��vice�.cr.am
?27 �}43 2Qb9 I'=ax 7?7 446 8036
Discussion
The existing two story building contains approximately 3,800 square feet of retail space
on the first floor and six (6) attached dwelling units on the second floor. The site is
situated on a highly visible and active intersection of Clearwater Beach and is located
within the Retail and Restaurant District of Be�zclz by Design. Bec�ch by Desigh
identifies vital retail and restaurant districts as a key element of any successful resort
destination and based partly upon the surrounding land use patterns, traffic, and its close
proximity to public parking facilities Beach by Design designated this specific area as the
Retail and Restaccrant District of Clearwater Beach.
Proposed Use
The Developer is currently working toward tenant agreements with two highly
recognizable and successful national brands to bring a Hooters Restaurant and Starbucks
Restaurant to Clearwater Beach.
The proposed design contemplates two primary first floor tenant spaces; the majority of
the northern portion of the first floor is allocated to a retail tenant (yet to be determined)
occupying approximately 1,819 sq. ff. Starbucks is envisioned within the south portion
of the first floor of the building, occupying approximately 1,546 sq. ft. The remaining
area of the first floor is allocated to the Elevator/Stair Lobby and Rear Service Hallway
for the second floor tenant in addition to an 80 sq. ft. Electrical Room.
Outdoor seating areas are contemplated within the development project associated with
the Starbucks tenant space and shall be accomplished through a separate review as
needed and determined, 375 sq. ft. of oLrtdoor seating area (within private property) has
been allocated for parking purposes. It is the intent of the Developer to cooperatively
work with the City to accomplish an appropriate and acceptable outdoor seating area as
the development plans progress through the review and permit process. The specific
design of any outdoor seating area(s) will require additional input and discussion and
shall be addressed prior to issuance of a building permit.
Second floor occupancy is assigned to the proposed Hooters Restaurant (approx. 3,164
sq. ft.); the design also includes a scenic roof top pavilion, providing wonderful outdoor
dining opportunities.
Please see the attached Tenant Area Schedule which provides specific areas and uses
per floor; this information also includes areas for the purpose of calculations associated
with FAR and Parking and is included within the Architectural plans for continuity.
Through this development proposal, Clearwater Beach will have a rare opportunity to
provide customers of two nationally recognized restaurant establishments, locations yards
from the sand and the Gulf of Mexico. The development proposal provides vibrant retail
and restaurant uses as requested for the District within Beach by Deszgn and will offer a
unique and memorable experience for the patrons of the nationally known restaurants.
2
The design offers a two (2) story structure with many architectural features creating an
interesting and vibrant focal point for a main entryway to our beach community. The
proposed balconies and outdoor seating areas will reflect positively on the beach
experience, creating the inviting and welcoming street-level environment desired by
Beach by Design.
General Applicability Criteria
1. The proposed development of t1�P iand will be in harmony with the scale,
bulk, coverage, density and �naracter of adjacent properties in which it is
located.
The adjacent properties are primarily comprised of one and two story buildings
similar in bulk, coverage, density and character of the �roposed development.
The proposed two (2) story retail and restaurant development will be in harmony
with the scale, bulk and coverage of the surrounding developments as the
proposed development provides similar lot coverage and density as the
surrounding sites. The proposal offers a building design of appropriate bulk and
scale based upon the project area, the character of the surrounding properties and
the intent of Beach by Design.
2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate
development and use of adjacent land and buildings or signi�cantly impair
the value thereof.
The proposed improvements will not discourage appropriate development and use
of the adjacent land and buildings, the area is already developed and the value of
adjacent and surrounding properties will not be compromised.
The development proposal will enhance this area of the Beach in a number of
ways, including:
1. Providing Clearwater Beach with highly recognized restaurant brands which
will serve the needs of the guests of the surrounding overnight
accommodations.
2. The proposed tenants �f .ihe,: �evelopment will provide important and
necessary support to the be�cn community in off-season months, offering uses
that will draw the locals throughout the year, in and out of season.
3. Proposed improvemenx� will significantly increase the value of the land
offering benefit to the surrounding land values and tax base.
4. The proposed updated architectural design will significantly enhance the
human scale and aesthetic �ppeal of the street-level facade creating a more
pedestrian-friendly environment at this highly visible intersection of the
beach.
3
5. Offering uses that clearly rneet the vision of the Retail and Restaurant District
of Beach by Design ai�� are recognized as vital to the success of a resort
destination.
6. Providing a new buildi:lg which meets currer�t Building Code, FEMA
regulations and ADA requirements in addition to meeting the intent of Beach
by Design and Design Criteria.
7. The incorporation of outdoor seating and balconies to enhance the street level
atmosphere; the roof top pavili��n will create additional outdoor dining
opportunities for the public, offering outdoor space for all to enjoy our
wonderful Florida lifestyle and Beach community.
8. The proposed development will be a contributor to the City's economic base
and creating many employment opportunities in fields that have been heavily
affected by the economy.
3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety of
persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use.
The proposed development will comply, as required, with all applicable codes
including the Florida Building Code, the Life Safety Code and the Florida Fire
Prevention Code. The proposed uses are appropriate and desired for the area,
responsible trash collection and disposal is provided for within the development
plan. Hours of operation will be appropriate for the commercially designated area
and the surrounding uses. Access to the development will be primarily pedestrian
in nature and will not adversely affect persons residing or working in the
neighborhood.
4. The proposed developm�nt is designed to minimize traffic congestion.
As stated above, pedestrian access is the primary means of access to the
development; ample parking i� available within the many public parking facilities
with other customers wallcing from nearby hotels.
Functionality from a parking perspective will be similar to the Palm Pavilion
Beachside Grill & Bar and Frenchy's Rockaway Grill on North Beach; Beach by
Design recognized a key element in the success of the Retail and Restaurant
District is the reliance on convenient public parking. A formal Parking Study is
provided within this submission and contains specific information and data in
association with parking for the development.
Trafiic impacts as a result of the proposed development will be minimal; it is
anticipated that nearby intersections and adjacent roadways will continue to
operate at the same levels of service after the proposed improvements are
completed. A formal Traffic Study is provided within this submission and
contains specific information and data regarding Traffic in association with the
proposed development.
�
5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the
immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development.
The community character is primarily comprised of one and two story
developments. The proposed two story development is consistent with the
surrounding and nearby uses, and the character of the community; the design
offers an appropriately scaled development for the vicinity.
The proposed development will meet the needs of the tourist driven community
and the desires of Beach by Design by providing uses specifically desired within
the District. The architectural design of the proposed development will visually
enhance the block and the entrance to our Beach Community.
6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including
visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts, on adjacent
properties. . �
The development proposal w�tl improve the visual appeal of the property from the
street and pedestrian-levPl; offering a Modern Miami architectural style which is
appropriate and aesthetically pleasing for this highly visible Beach location.
The proposed trash collection area is located at the rear of the building, is
properly screened and will not negatively impact the passerby; a loading area is
provided for on the commonly owned site to the north, effectively and responsibly
serving both properties. The architectural components of the building provide
desired buffering and minimize all activities associated with restaurant operation
at street level.
COMPREHENSIVE INFILL REDEVELOPMENT - PROJECT CRITERIA
1. The development or redevelopment is otherwise impractical without
deviations from use and/or development standards set forth in the zoning
district.
Redevelopment without deviations is impractical as the deviations are necessary
to meet the intent of the Design Criteria contained within Beach by Design, to
accommodate the specific needs of nationally recognizable retail and restaurant
tenants; and to provide a viable development on a minimally sized parcel of land
in the current economy. Deviations associated with parking are necessary as
acknowledged by Beach by Design within the District discussion. The proposed
deviations are necessary to accommodate the retail and restaurant uses desired by
Beach by Design and to maximize the allowable development potential of the
land.
5
Setbacks
Architectural elements and red?iced setbacks are desired within the Design
Guidelines of Beach by Des�g �; �?cvi:ations are necessary to accommodate the
reduced setbacks for the builc�:r�g, balconies and columns. The proposed design
will enhance the block and �resent a. more pedestrian-friendly environment as
desired by I3each by Desi���.
Deviations associated with the parking, pavement setback for the drive aisle and
the dumpster enclosure is also necessary; the area is sufficiently and effectively
designed to provide a few parking spaces, the required trash staging area and
access to a shared loading zone. The small surface parking area and proposed
setbacks to pavement along the east result in sufficient and appropriate
separation/buffering between buildings and is similar to the existing developed
conditions. This "back of house" area is necessary for business operation, is out
of primary view and will not have a negative impact on neighboring properties or
street-level activities.
Si�ht Visibility Trian�les
A request for flexibility with regard to the sight visibility triangle located at the
southwest corner of the site (Mandalay Avenue and State Road 60 Roundabout) is
requested. The proposed encroachment projects into the large landscaped area
and sidewalk within the Right of Way and in no way creates a hazard to vehicles
or pedestrians.
2. The development or redevelopment will be consistent with the goals and
policies of the Comprehensive Plan, as well as with the general purpose,
intent and basic planning objectives of this code, and with the intent and
purpose of this zoning district.
The proposal supports the following Comprehensive Plan
Goals/Policies/Objectives but �s not limited to:
A.6.6 Objective - Tourism is a substantial element of the City's economic base
and as such the City shall continue to support the maintenance and enhancement
of this important economic sectc�r.
A.6.7 Objective - Redevelopment activities shall be sensitive to the city's
waterfront and promote appropriate public access to the city's waterfront
resources.
Beach by Deszgn, Retail and Restaurant District, prefers retail and restaurant uses
within this specific area of the Beach. The availability of convenient public
parking was noted as a key element for the strategy and success of the District.
C�
The proposed uses will promote tourism activities and enjoyment of our natural
resources. The proposed redevelopment will provide an allowable and desired
use within the "Tourist" zoning district and the "Resort Facilities High" land use
category, the proposed uses are consistent with the goals of the Comprehensive
plan and Beach by Design.
3. The development or redevelopment will not impede the normal and orderly
development and improvement of surrounding properties.
The proposed development is compatible with the neighborhood, as is more
particularly discussed in General Applicability Criteria 1 and 2 together with
Comprehensive Infill Criteria 4 below, and will not impede other development.
The proposed redevelopment project will beneiit the ,community as a whole and
specifically this district. The proposed development may encourage additional
investment and improvement to the surrounding properties and may draw
additional nationally recognized corporations to the Beach.
4. Adjoining properties wil� �►ot suffer substantial detriment as a result of the
proposed development.
Adjoining properties will not suffer substantial detriment as a result of this
proposal. The proposed retail and restaurant use is an allowable and preferred
use, as the District name suggests. Retail and restaurant uses are well established
within the neighborhood and the district. The proposal includes many
improvements such as, providing a new updated structure which meets current
building codes, FEMA regulations, fire and ADA requirements; the site
improvements include provisions for responsible trash staging and a loading area.
5. The proposed use shall otherwise be permitted by the underlying future land
use category, be compatible with adjacent land uses, will not substantially
alter the essential use characteristics of the neighborhood; and shall
demonstrate compliance with one or more of the following objectives:
a. The proposed use is permitted in this zoning district as a minimum
standard, flexible standard or flexible development use;
b. The proposed use would be a signi�cant economic contributor to the
City's economic base by diversifying the local economy or by creating
jobs;
c. The development proposal accommodates the expansion or
redevelopment of an existing economic contributor
d. The proposed use provides for the provision of affordable housing
e. The proposed use provides far development or redevelopment in an
area that is characterized by other similar development and where a
land use plan amendment and rezoning would result in spot land use
or zoning designation; ,
f. The proposed use pr�vistes for the development of a new and/or
preservation of a��c� �cing waterfront use
7
The "Resort Facility High" land use category and the "Tourist" zoning district
both permit retail and restaurant uses; the district allows both uses as minimum
standard and flexible standard uses. The proposed nationally recognized
businesses will significantly contribute to the local economy, will promote
tourism and generate new jobs for the community.
6. Flexibility with regard to u.�e., ��i w�idth, required setbacks, height, and off-
street parking are justifie� based on demonstrated compliance with all of the
following design objectives:
a. The proposed develop�ment will not impede the normal and orderly
development and impr�vement of the surr�unding properties for uses
permitted in this zoning district;
Retail and Restaurant uses are permitted in the "Tourist" (T) zoning
district without special approval. As ihe surrounding properties are made
up of retail, restaurant and overnight accommodations, the proposed two
story development will not impede normal and orderly development and
improvements of the surrounding properties as previously discussed
within General Applicability Criteria 2. This re-development proposal
may stimulate additional redevelopment and improvements in the area.
b. The proposed development complies with applicable design guidelines
adopted by the City;
Through site and architectural design the proposed development complies
with the design guidelines within Beach by Design and the Retail and
Restaurant District.
c. The design, scale, and intensity of the proposed development supports
the established or emerging character of an area;
The proposed two story retail and restaurant development will continue to
support the character of area. The area is primarily comprised of similar
uses and developments of similar design, scale and intensity as the
proposed development. ,
Please see additior�al �iscussion under General Applicability Criteria 1.
d. In order to form a cohesive, visually interesting and attractive
appearance, the prop�sed development i�tcorporates a substantial
number of fhe following design elements:
• Changes in horizontal building planes
• Use of architectural details such as columns, cornices,
stringcourses, Pilasters, porticos, balconies, railings, awnings,
etc.
� Variety of materials and colors
• Distinctive fenestration patterns
• Building stepbacks; and
• Distinctive roof forms
E
n
A variety of the above elements are incorporated into the architectural
design as shown on the building elevations. While there are flat roofs and
continuous level floors for accessibility, there are cantilevered roof
overhangs, awnings, and a variety of congruous but varying elements such
as roofs, railings, curtain wall mullings and reveals.
Columns and plasters take a very prominent role in the design of several
large floor to above roof instances. Columns are also a combination of
large masses with proportionately sealed round columns. A portico was
not provided but there are sheltered spaces at ground level meeting the
intent of the Design Guidelines. There are several balconies both
cantilevered and conventional. There are several awnings on the third
level. There is a large proportionate roof mass above the elevator and
elevator lobby on the third floor. There is a string course type element
tying horizontal reveals and horizontal mullings together.
The project uses at least two different stucco finishes as well as large glass
surfaces and metal railings. Two contrasting, complementary colars are
used throughout.
On the large column/plasters, a tightly struck horizontal pattern is used. In
other areas there are broad axeas of stucco always framed linearly by
horizontal and vertical ele�nents. There are step backs on three of four
sides and on each floor.
There are several �arge vertical forms tying into a proportionately large
roof mass as well as several cantilevered roofs.
e. The proposed development provides for appropriate buffers,
enhances landscape design and appropriate distances between
buildings.
The proposed setbacks and buffers are appropriate for the Beach
environment and meet the intent of Beach by Design; reduced setbacks are
provided with outdoor space being reserved for seating and pedestrian
flow.
Beach by Design
The proposed restaurant and retail development is within the allowable 1.0 F.A.R and is an
appropriate scale for the surrounding area.
The proposed two story structure meets the height allowances permitted by code and provides a
use that is preferred within the Retail and Restaurant District of Beach by Design. The
architectural design creates the desired change in the building plate, plane and mass as prescribed
by Beach by Design.
��
�
The Design Guidelines Section of Beach by Design states "No particular architectural style is
prescribed. However, good architecture, from a community character perspective, comes in all
shapes and styles. There is, however, in every community an established vocabulary of the
"good," the "bad," and the "ugly." New builldings should respect this vocabulary and enhance
the community character whenever possible. The more daring the design, the more sensitive the
particular architecture is to failure." Five quantifiable aspects of the architectural vocabulary are
provided within this Section of Beach by De;sign and we have taken great care to design this
project to meet each of the criteria;
The design is respectful of the arc�iitectural vocabulary within Beach by Design and the
community character; the buildir.g is in scale to its height and length and offers the desired
elements of step-backs, and balcor.ies.
While the building footprint is considerably less than 5,000 square feet and no single dimensions
approach 100', we have tried to use step backs to break up broad planes and keep in scope and
spirit of the quantifiable aspects. The building envelope tapers as it rises vertically in
proportions we feel accommodate the beach by design criteria.
The street level fa�ade encompasses a wrap-around plaza at the southwest corner easily
accessible by pedestrian traffic while still maintaining the required setbacks. There are large and
inviting expanses of transparent vertical glass with several areas open for landscaping.
Materials are stucco and metal with colors taken from the surrounding natural areas in light tan
to dark brown. .
The proposed development is compatible with the neighborhood, as is more particularly
discussed in General Applicability Criteria 1 and 2 together with Comprehensive Infill Criteria 4
above.
The existing dimensions of the right of way and curb locations allow appropriate sidewalks along
Mandalay Avenue with a connection to the public sidewalk along the south side of the
development. The street-level fa�ade offers the desired architectural details and elements. Street
level outdoor seating areas are proposed but will be finalized to meet the requirements of Code
and/or as approved/agreed to by the City. We are collectively working with the City to
determine the specific design and location of outdoor seating areas. The provision of outdoor
seating meets the desires and intent of Beach by Design to promote pedestrian activity and
tourism on Clearwater Beach.
Please see architectural plans and �arovi�ed Photo Collage with Narrative prepared by the
Architect for additional illustratif �e e��n�lence of compliance with the Design Guidelines
contained within Beach by Design.
387 -391 Mandalay Ave LLC. NES 1102 - 07.14.11 by Renee Ruggierohmr
10
_� -
�-
�
�
�
�
�
.
a
�- TENANT AREA SCHEDULE
TYPE OF
TENANT TYPE OF SPACE LEVEL FAR PARKING OCCUPANT AREA
ELECTRICAL ELECTRICAUPHONE 1ST FLOOR YES YES MECHANICAL 80 SF
ROOM
MECHANICAL 80 SF
STARBUCKS MAIN SPACE iST FLOOR YES YES RESTAURANT 1546 SF
HOOTERS LOBBY iST FLOOR YES YES RESTAURANT 228 SF
STARBUCKS PATIO 1ST FLOOR NO YES RESTAURANT 375 SF
HOOTERS CORRIDOR 1ST FLOOR YES YES RESTAURANT 248 SF
RESTAURANT 2396 SF
RETAIL ONE MAIN SPACE 1ST FLOOR YES YES RETAIL 1819 SF
RETAIL 1819 SF
HOOTERS BALCONY 2ND FLOOR NO YES RESTAURANT 1350 SF
HOOTERS MAIN SPACE 2ND FLOOR YES YES RESTAURANT 2058 SF
HOOTERS -- LOBBY 2ND FLOOR YES YES RESTAURANT 1505e
HOOTERS � KITCHEN 2ND FLOOR YES YES RESTAURANT 956 SF
RES i AURANT . 4513 SF
MECHANICAL ELEV. EQUIP. ROOFTOP LEVEL NO NO MECHANICAL 88 SF
MECHANICAL WELL NON-PUBLIC ACCESS ROOFTOP LEVEL NO NO MECHANICAL 868 SF
MECHANICAL 956 SF
HOOTERS COVERED BAR / ROOFTOP LEVEL NO YES RESTAURANT 979 SF
SEATING
HOOTERS LOBBY ROOFTOPLEVEL YES YES RESTAURANT 240SF
HOOTERS UNISEX TOILET ROOM ROOFTOP LEVEL YES YES RESTAURANT 81 SF
HOOTERS DRY STORAGE ROOFTOP LEVEL YES NO RESTAURANT 320 SF
HOOTERS BEER COOLER ROOFTOP LEVEL YES NO RESTAURANT 248 SF
HOOTERS OPEN SEATING ROOFTOP LEVEL NO YES RESTAURANT 1772 SF
RESTAURANT 3640 SF
Grand total 13404 SF
FAR AREA SCHE�ULE
LEVEL AR�A
1ST FLOOR 3920 SF
2ND FLOOR 3163 SF
ROOFTOP LEVEL 889 SF
Grand total 7973 SF
PARKING AREA SCHEDULE
LEVEL AREA
1 ST FLOOR 4296 SF
2ND FLOOR 4513 SF
ROOFTOP LEVEL 3072 SF
Grand total 11880 SF
�
F-
z
�
�
w
J
Q
U
�
H
0
Z
O
�
JOB NUMBER:
10162
DATE:
05/19/11
DRAWN BY:
in
JAB3
DATE
12 DESIGN REFINEMENTS 0523.11
13 DESIGN REFINEMENTS 0524.11
14 DESIGN REFINEMENTS 0525.11
15 SITE REFINEMENTS 05.30.11
16 DESIGN APPROVAL 06.01.11
18 RAISED RF. TOP 4 IN. 06.16.11
19 DESIGN REFINEMENTS 06.23.11
20 DESIGN REFINEMENTS 07.01.11
22 DRC COMMENTS 07.14.11
� n � .--�
i
�
1 " ___'.'_'--.
�
LANOSGAPENOTE: LEGEND —����x. ��;,
RaRlo� IUTIVE UNDSCAPIMG WILL BE YROVIOEO
♦NO PER SELTON l-�201C 0/ iNE LOWIINT' ���
OEVELDPYENf LO�E. AM AUTOWTIC PERWMEM HFy �p�y�T i � !} ��r�.�,;
IRNIUTON MTEY WILL Bf PFWIGED.
YPERVIOS SURfACE N�11D SHALL NDT BE NEN CONCXEfE �
IXLEEOE�.
0.�5 PEWIOUS SIIq�ALE RAT10 SX�Il BE NEW 9lDG.
� �:
iNOVIpED ON SRE.
�!Sfis �` r'//i
FX B.MIC PAVfRS NEIY 01I1&SIFA FNtLO3LLK ��. 1� '`$ .��
r rwu roxc. a.o g �/
n,� m iura er� .um I� [
urr ro�rcr rnr w nvr. sres � ��!
� U)Y SR'tfAy �� ^F ur<2i �:`\.'.! ` �
'=x �. = " .._°-.-r. ;, H �!� -'--_ �3.i1 � ` �.. '; j /
.. ...,.� . ,>m : .
. . ,E,= ---�a�zm �' :J„ i 'd � ; ,_-��!,
Of'UVERI(5 b l': . i '.
m.� � '.��� . , . -'. w �- . t:: � ��_� �_ __ ' �_�v .�' i .� W ''t ;�:. _
_ _ . � �-, � " --_'_c___--_'__ � �''� '�
aa'/ �w� m.� f.r'"r,..�'�� �� ��' : ,..�.� �:�
ra" ' �
/ '�. (�'��W � � � � _ � -�
,,. ;�..�.�,�� °'� �'— '_"J � lt i
„""`^. � / � � � � .. �� _ � �
rrcw i:• r ss• wauG mxc , q�g1�3 '_ a. q ���� � � iu""" 3 I� i � �..,,�
,
�x"�°„"` ` ���� ,�,. �,. , . �—� � � �
L.�
� 3 f j— � � --, _,�}.,.,,,,,�
� _ �. '. ' � ��- .'p a.i. � m[� I `�� �ti $ t _.\\ \
-���,.,'- ���c� V rv=`r:- i� rurniexw �. \t� \\
� I I �,�. ..� , , �V�,
J � r� € �\ `; `�� :
. . _ , , ,,
, .- ,
g= '� �:�' � • , � .` ,> ',:,
- � � �. ,�. � , � � � .
� �r, ' �
� cc � � ic, s.�cx -. . ,�yc o� mw �. ` � _�'�' 'i
i
x� > -' ^ �� nitns[°'°� teaxv ��\ �xn � �
... ' t �, � F.�� . ' �-yyyE _
� , q � nx. ovn�w.vc � ^„ A
4 ]
o•hac IHt2.6TORYBIDG i g j! ' � .,
SRliq'-�a� �����r� _ _ _ I+ �h fi �.i
� �.�s� - 4! �l ta � i
_ '� � w.roFm �� �� °
- ' - �'�-na. oiwww _
_ " ivm �. � i p E � !
�cusm �
s�msr � ' evym y.v � 3 '_ � i ( �
� . . . _ . �� i i
� a �K � ` .. . � 3 . i
:� Lll�f. � b��' I i cG
I 11
1J
.Y,} - _ - MYN� SNiII g� -- �a ( rA 7 � �
'�< �-,a . _ "sre°i^'r"u"cc ;�g�c°fur'oNO.rr i
'^��: � ;� ' � h my`_ i �'
XX' �
'�'\-M�°y�. �_� -,Y� ��,c,�,� � �� xnrsrr /-' . . �` � ,
F _ � , ��RACif � l'� l f g '
_ �, f: � .�. l _ � - - �- I _, .,-"+• 7;� �� ! :/
,. ' "`� , _ . __.. - / � �
� '�s � ue ar n.w
z r fi.vo R.e sro u� � , � _ �� - s / ,.; � -... ,s�.,.,,,y ; /
. s" a'°.1 °�rwuMC `t'a cur a ��a.m n. '!�iaz°= � .. `� ura ar zro '^ //
r. ec �- �— _ -�_-_-____ x a .:- . 1 _ 14� 9uevnw�r � •. L -� ' arrmu.w. ' /,/�
�_,_,_� `-,-_... .� .vW � L - � 1 � �� �w �\ � �// �y
aq""--,._ '_- �1.1ro /AS - �- i°�-. ;a ,:
� + v> n
_ _ _�=-`__ �--u- � ��
`_- — —` = _ I . _ r: , - x � -. .- '„� i
l `�,�, ` � -� i
�;+e��.__; __�:3� _ �`. �.-'%'..;;�
, _ _ '-�r.-- -- ..... : � ,
---- � ; i i 1 �
"` - ' jl n
-w.cr, ! j i 1, „�, '�...
_ -__,_.
�-��.� --'----.__ „--�--.-..___ :
r,,r„ '_,-,_. _..--,:._._:_..�.__--._.._,,,_. -�"��; i!
_
,,, _
_ � _, �
�= ..
,.- .;� .�` � _
� �-:i; i r �'_ _�� ;,==_ , `!: �
� � e �. s'.. ♦ � �.;� �." .. . � � �
�i
. ..aNx) ,n , �-_—.__. �_" �_..�.._ -:��_
.� µ ::
,� �fi
G \�cF
•.r r����
(bip� N iF
xtw '.�
tlGRi:
1. 1CC651B1E P�RKING SP�CE SH�LL IU�VE A
VERTIGL LLGF HEICM Of s' - 2' PER
FLORIW BUILDING COOE CIUPTER 11. SECTION
11-48.5
2
�
Q
Z
SCALE: 1 "=10'
� io o s io zo
� U
d �
J
a a
M9 r
� a °0
� Q aLL
� � �W
� a
� �a
�{ � � z
� � W
�Il � � ca
� m -�
NO�S�d6
V� �o �
� `:; . . -..
�
� _ ____._.__
LY CW:G
ro aauµ
35.00
a.00 zs.00
$U-3$ teet
Width : 8.00
7roek : 8.00
B�.K p�� Lock to Lock 7ime : 6.00 �, �� s_ �,�,
Steering Angle : 30.00 pyK., �0 M/e' mcx M�us
ro wrcrr ,vcw nac �xo wrc
m �rrtr arr a nnr. uas
.,.�_._. msus�r. ^-a"iC... . �::ra.�.,
���1,•��
x ss• r,wwas e
casorcHr
LEGEND
NFNASTLLT ,. x.,.i�d'.,y°:S�'.���
MEW COMLREfE �
MEW BLUG �
�
�
�,'�„ �� w�+n
I �` ' � I i _ `� � '� /i
� � � 3.t� '�v )YIF � `�$ Y
__ ���`..�� �v" "y�Y �p Y �i rLLVC 6�311U ' t. `� `'.�,
� �= i , r,� .»„�
`,A
� �� � : � �
, , , �
� i,� �� � ,
g� ��� ; . . ,�
o �.�-� _j �
` a� x sww � m-a" Lw ,�.��
ucwn �
i
� t,n-.r �� ai' smvl_ 'I �ti+HC ��m . �1 ; �
nx. r�-,xwxc ., � ..
.. � � . � � . . �
srrn'�i �ar r , IRiY] bSORYBIDQ � e e� � . : a
F
�
• x-. _ - FtaSa _ ` � BA e !� t
�.r ''
- (UR�RffiAB� �� z �. e, . �
- � �uwc �:xa 3rf t\ .
na. ovicecwc � �\ '
_ . � ;� � i 8 � e � ��i
nom �•
; ; . . , m�na ' . _ � i .r i' I 1
° _ �. nvo� . �Aar ' , � ' 9 � � � �
. ... ��. ,; .. ' � - �. � � 3 � � ,
;
; � . . _ �y� ; � -:.. � :', 1 ! r
� _ , _ ep � , � % Nn
� 1l �
� "T` N .. � .. , ,( s
� � � i � ,..➢MCG Iwl 3 � �li 1.
�.'<Y,-�1 �io��.r�,;.� i � 'f ' ..�,.r„'°°e-� . rsxaucwr' '���.. . . � J �
=��' � : xtw ewr /"`" ��
' _ , �.,, �.' _ - I �, nmo i �xAa' i /�� `
- : , 1__ .� " �'fnat'� �,,,,, ' �•
1 ,� /
� � .� ��.: u,r o� sliwJ � ranv .- _ " i � "f� '"` ^�.G
� � _ (PMnM—Jx0 �M/c[K�p� L____ � " p '� ••id %
= y y.s ax.l °7�nw.vc �aa -L' � - `� uxr ar vro : � •
u..wn � „!` � �rr cr zxn �"---� ' � --�.y�..rtw. orcieuxe.'�.r"��
,L,,,� a: - 2e a+(cwr �r.r cr —sL,
fW0 r�f� .,u s ___ �� .I_ �F \. `� _s '/ �? ��i�
Tt J �� ` �'. ,�
,� ,
e: -.� I �
+. ' ��l ., �
- a+w 11 11 a v�
_- en an - --_.,.— - — — ,. �_ .m., 'I j; I �I
- z-_ � ,
' -____. 1 '
�AANDALAY AIENUE ` "� ��
�MAND w .�....... _ .
AIAY BOULEVARD - PLAT) u.,,, �� - -- __---�.__ �! �r� �,a"`
w.o 'r` --�' �___ _ ��
� �
��.
1. ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACE SfULL HAVE A
VERf1UL LIE�R NEIGHT OG !' — 2' PER
ROMIO� BUIIDIMG COOE CXAPTER 11, SECiION
I1-1.63
NOTE:
1. CURBS SHALL
BE MODIFIED TO
MITIGATE FOR
� TRUCK
� ACCESSIBILITY.
CLEARWATER BEACH/
SiATE ROA� 60 ROUNDABOUT
(MARIANNE STREET-PLAT)
Pn �om vu�l
2
�
O
Z
SCALE: 1"=70'
1
za
Z
a
J
a
�
�
H
U
�
�
�~ i
U
J
J
a
'a
J �
Q e-
O
= a�
Q
� �d
aw
rn cQ
�3
fa
�
�
NO�S�pe
0000
PARKING ANALYSIS FOR
HOOTERS AT CLEARWATER BEACH
385 MANDALAY AVENUE
CLEARWATER BEACH, FLORIDA
PREPARED FOR:
387-391 MANDALAY AVE, LLC
�. . . . . .
• _• _ •
GULF COAST CONSULTING, INC.
REVISED JULY 2011
PROJECT # 11-018
TABLE OF CONTENTS
INTRODUCTION
II. METHODOLOGY
III. EXISTING CONDITIONS ANALYSIS
IV. FUTURE CONDITIONS WITH REDEVELOPMENT
V. CONCLUSION
� �
Robert C. Per li i, AICP/PTP
AICP # 9023 / PTP #133
I. INTRODUCTION
The 0.19 acre proj ect site is located at 3 85 Mandalay Avenue and currently
contains a ground floor retail shop and six apartments on the second floor. The
site is proposed to be redeveloped as a mixed use project containing a 8,142
square foot two story + rooftop deck Hooters restaurant, a 1,921 square foot
ground floor Starbucks, and a 1,819 square foot specialty retail store (Crocs). The
site is located on the east side of Mandalay Avenue between the roundabout and
Papaya Street on Clearwater Beach (See Figure 1). The site is located in the
Tourist (T) zoning district, and per Section 2-802 of the Community Development
Code has a minimum parking requirement of 7-15 parking spaces per 1,000
square feet of restaurant space, and 4-5 spaces per 1,000 square feet of retail
space. According to strict interpretation of the code, the proposed development
would require between 77-160 parking spaces (7-9 spaces for the retail space and
70 — 151 spaces for the restaurants. The proposed site plan shows a total of three
(3) spaces being provided on-site.
Per Section 3-1405 "Shared Parking" of the Community Development Code the
peak shared parking requirement is 76-159 spaces between 6PM and Midnight on
weekdays as shown below:
SHARED PARKING DEMAND (LOW)
Land Use Weekday Weekday Weekday Weekend Weekend
12 - 6 AM 9AM - 4PM 6PM - 12 9AM - 4PM 6- 12 PM
Mid
Retail 5% (0) 70% (5) 90% (6) 100% (7) 70% (5)
Restaurant 10% (7) 50% (35) 100% (70) 50% (35) 100% (70)
Total 7 40 76 42 75
SHARED PARKING DEMAND (HIGH)
Land Use Weekday Weekday Weekday Weekend Weekend
12 - 6 AM 9AM - 4PM 6PM - 12 9AM - 4PM 6- 12 PM
Mid
Retail 5% (0) 70% (6) 90% (8) 100% (9) 70% (6)
Restaurant 10% (15) 50% (76) 100% (151) 50% (76) 100% (151)
Total 15 82 159 85 157
The code provides for reducing the required number of parking spaces to
recognize the special situations that exist on Clearwater Beach. Section 2-802 of
the Community Development Code allows a reduction in parking if the property
will require fewer parking spaces per floor axea than otherwise required or
adequa.te parking is available through existing or planned and committed parking
facilities within 1,000 feet of the property.
City of Clearwater staff has recognized the retail establishments located on
Clearwater Beach, in close proximity to municipal parking lots, on-street parking
spaces, nearby hotels/motels and residential condominiums within walking
distance, have a great potential for "walk-up" customers The Jolly Trolley also
stops near the site and there are bicycle racks near the site. Staff also recognizes
the available public parking in nearby lots serves two functions, one to serve
beachgoers, and two to provide paxking for beach related businesses. This parking
analysis was prepared to determine the availability of parking spaces.
II. METHODOLOGY
Prior to conducting this analysis a methodology was established with the City of
Clearwater staff. It was agreed GCC would obtain hours of operation and
employee shift data from each establishment. Employee parking demand was
based on 80% of employees requiring a parking space and 20% arriving by other
modes of transportation as has been customary for previous parking studies on
Clearwater Beach. The parking space requirement for customers was evaluated
using a 50% factor based on customer surveys conducted at Surf Style/Britts for a
previous parking study. The previous study confirmed 50% of the customers
parking in local hotels and condominium lots, and 50% parked in public beach
lots or used on-site parking spaces. These factors are shown in Table l. These
factors were used in preparing a"time-of-day" matrix which is shown in Table 2.
It was agreed GCC would conduct a parking accumulation study on a Friday
between 11AM and 2 PM (lunch) and 6 PM to 10 PM, and Saturday between 10
AM and 4 PM and 6 PM — 10 PM. The study area included on-street parking
along Mandalay Avenue between the Hilton south driveway and San Marco
Street, on-street paxking on Papaya Street, Municipal Lot #31, Municipal Lot #
34, Municipal Lot # 35, Municipal Lot #43 and the Hyatt Aqualea parking garage
which contains public parking. These areas include a total of 1,040 parking
spaces.
TABLE 1- HOOTERS AT CLEARWATER BEACH - PARKING DEMAND PARAMETERS
SPACES REQUIRED
ASSUMPTIONS:
EMPLOYEE PARKING IS LIMITED TO 80% OF EMPLOYEES USING A CAR BASED ON CLEARWATER EXPECTATIONS
RESTAURANT CUSTOMERS PARKING BASED ON CODE REQUIREMENT OF 15 SPACES/1000 SF FOR RESTAURANT
RETAIL CUSTOMERS PARKING BASED ON CODE REQUIREMENT OF 5 SPACES / 1000 SF OF RETAIL AREA
THIS HAS A TOTAL DEMAND OF 122 SPACES FOR HOOTERS
A TOTAL DEMAND OF 29 SPACES FOR STARBUCKS
A TOTAL DEMAND OF 9 SPACES FOR RETAIL SPACE
TABLE 2- TIME OF DAY PARKING DEMAND
HOOTERS HOOTERS STARBUCKS STARBUCKS STARBUCKS RETAIL RETAIL HOOTERS STARBUCKS RETAIL TOTAL
TIME PERIOD SHIFT A SHIFT B SHIFT A SHIFT B SHIFT C SHIFT A SHIFT B CUSTOMERS CUSTOMERS CUSTOMERS DEMAND
12 MID-1 AM 8 S
1AM-2AM �
2AM-3AM �
3AM-4AM �
4AM-5AM 4 4
5AM-6AM 4 75 19
6AM-7AM 4 15 19
7AM-8AM 4 4 15 23
SAM-9AM 4 4 2 75 25
9AM-10AM 4 4 2 75 5 30
10 AM - 11 AM 6 4 4 2 15 5 36
11 AM - 12 NOON 6 4 4 2 61 15 5 97
12 NOON - 1 PM 6 4 2 2 61 15 5 95
1 PM-2PM 6 4 4 2 2 61 15 5 99
2PM-3PM 6 4 4 2 2 61 15 5 99
3 PM - 4 PM 6 4 4 2 2 61 15 5 99
4 PM - 5 PM 6 8 4 4 2 61 15 5 105
5PM-6PM 6 8 4 2 61 15 5 101
6PM-7PM 8 4 2 61 15 5 95
7 PM -8 PM 8 4 2 67 15 5 95
8 PM - 9 PM 8 4 2 67 15 5 95
9PM-10PM 8 4 2 61 75
10PM-11 PM 8 4 61 73
11 PM - 12 MID 8 4 61 73
III. EXISTING CONDITIONS ANALYSIS
Existing conditions were established by conducting parking lot counts between
the hours of 6:00 PM and 10:00 PM on Friday May 20, 201 l, and Saturday May
21 2011 between 10:00 AM and 4:00 PM and 6:00 PM and 10:00 PM. Weather
conditions were typical for late May with a high temperature of 90 degrees and
lows of 78 degrees. No rain was encountered at any time during the study. The
aforementioned parking areas were checked on the hour for the number of spaces
that were occupied. The number of occupied spaces was noted and an hourly
accumulated total was obtained for each specific parking area and the whole study
area.
The main parking facilities serving the southern part of the Mandalay Avenue
business district are two municipal lots and on-street parking. Municipal Lot #31
contains 152 parking spaces, Municipal lot # 34 contains 23 metered spaces plus 1
handicapped space and is located south of Papaya Street. Municipal lot # 35
contains 25 metered parking spaces plus 1 handicapped space and is located south
of the CVS, Municipal Lot #43 contains 41 metered spaces and is located both
east and west of East Shore Drive, and Municipal Lot #63 is located between
Poinsettia Avenue and East Shore Drive and contains 33 spaces + 2 handicapped
spaces. Mandalay Avenue between the Hilton main entrance and San Marco
Street contains 26 metered on-street parallel parking spaces and Papaya Street
contains 7 metered parking spaces.
Frida�Mav 20, 2011
On Friday paxking demand did not vary significantly throughout the study period
with a low of 305 occupied spaces (29%) at 11:00 AM to a peak demand of 570
occupied spaces (55%) at 8:00 PM. As such, there were a minimum of 474
unused spaces in the study area throughout the study period. Closer analysis
shows Municipal Lot # 31 and the on-street spaces on Papaya Street were almost
always full, Municipal Lots #34, #35 and #43 and Mandalay Avenue spaces were
underutilized throughout the mid-day hours but nearly fully occupied through the
evening. The Hyatt garage was underutilized throughout the mid-day and evening
study hours. Table 3 provides an hourly tabulation and Figure 2 provides a graph
of hourly parking space occupancy.
Saturdav May 21, 2011
On Saturday parking demand varied significantly throughout the day from a low
of 282 occupied spaces (27%) at 10:00 AM to a peak demand of 744 occupied
spaces (72%) at 4:00 PM. As such, there were a minimum of 296 unused spaces
throughout the day. Again a closer analysis shows Municipal Lot # 31 and the on-
street spaces on Papaya Street were almost always full. However on Saturday
Municipal Lots #34, #35 and #43 and Mandalay Avenue spaces were heavily used
0
N
N
}
Q
M �
wa
m9
az
f LL
�f��is�
W aaaaaaa
��0000000
� o 0 0 0 0 0�
�.-N�(V <C'rio �
� � (��l
F � �
O � �
J J J
a��
vaa
Z U U
7 Z Z
Z � �
N Z 2
W W W
U U U
Q Q Q
aaa
(/1 (q N
O O �
W W W
aaa
odadaQ
U U U
�Z �Z OZ
S 2 2
m.- �
N N N
>?�
U U U
Z Z Z
1000
900
800
700
�
v 600
a
a
�
W 500
a
�
v 400
c�
0
300
200
100
0
FIGURE 2- FRIDAY MAY 20, 2011
11AM 12:00 PM 1:00 PM 2:00 PM 6:00 PM 7:00 PM 8:00 PM 9:00 PM
TIME OF DAY
--� Series1
0
N
i'
a
f
r
a
w°�
J �
m f
f N
�p o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 o g o 0 0 0 0
� o � iv � iJ i+i e in i� io 6i
� c� n
Fit#
�00
a��
vaa
Z U U
] Z Z
Z � �
— Z 2
N _ _
W W W
U U U
6QQ
aaa
fn N f/1
0 O O
wWW
aaa
¢ndd
U U U
�Z OZ OZ
2 2 2
e � �
f/1 N fq
W W W
� O O
U U cJJ
2 Z Z
1000
900
800
700
N
cWj 600
a
a
�
W 500
a
�
v 400
O
300
200
100
0
FIGURE 3- SATURDAY MAY 21, 2011
10:00 AM 11:00 AM 12:00 PM 1:00 PM 2:00 PM 3:00 PM 4:00 PM 6:00 PM 7:00 PM 8:00 PM 9:00 PM
TIME OF DAY
� Series1
throughout the mid-day hours and occupied through the evening. The Hyatt
garage was underutilized throughout the mid-day and evening study hours. Table
4 provides an hourly tabulation and Figure 3 provides a graph of hourly parking
space occupancy.
IV. FUTURE CONDITIONS WITH REDEVELOPMENT
The proposed redevelopment as a mixed-use project would result in only 3 on-site
parking spaces and must obviously rely on available public parking spaces in the
area. The redevelopment would require between 76 and 159 parking spaces
according to strict interpretation of section 3-1405 of the code. A detailed hourly
analysis was completed based on the expected operating characteristics of the
restaurants and retail space. As shown in Table 2, employee plus customer
parking, including shift overlaps, would result in a peak parking space demand of
105 spaces at 4 PM. Parking demand would vary throughout the day/night, being
near 100 spaces for the period of 11 AM — 9 PM.
In reviewing the available spaces from Table 3 and Table 4, and assuming the
worst case, a minimum of 296 parking spaces are available to satisfy any demand
therefore there is adequate parking available to support the proposed
redevelopment.
V. CONCLUSION
This an�alysis was conducted in accordance with a specific methodology
establisYied with City of Clearwater staff. This analysis demonstrates of the 1,040
total parking spaces included in the study area, a maximum of 744 were occupied
during any hour of the study period and a minimum of 296 spaces were available.
A detailed analysis of time of day variations demonstrate parking demand would
vary from 0 spaces to 105 spaces. As such, adequate parking is available within
reasonable walking distance of the project to support the reduction in on-site
parking spaces.
APPENDIX A
Pa�e 1 of 1
Robert Pergolizzi
From: Robert Pergolizzi
Sent: Wednesday, May 18, 2011 4:09 PM
To: 'Robert.Tefft@MyClearwater.com'; 'tracey.bruch@myClearwater.com'; Bennett.Elbo@myClearwater.com
Cc: 'Renee Ruggiero'
Subject: Hooters / Starbucks at Clearwater Beach - Parking Study
Good Afternoon - Here is a summary of our meeting this morning. We will be conducting a Parking Study
for the proposed Hooters/Starbucks at Clearwater Beach this weekend. We will obtain data on # of
employees, hours of operation, and shift changes. A mode split for employees will be based on approved
prior studies to determine the number of employees requiring a parking space.
Customers of these establishments are expected to come from the beach, nearby hotels, and from the
mainland. We have surveys conducted for Surt Style/Britts that provided a good estimate of customer
parking characteristics for retail/restaurant developments on the beach. This factor will be used to
determine the customer demand for parking spaces. It is generally agreed due to the limited amount of
on-site parking available, the customers (and employees) will need to rely on public parking in the area.
I have field reviewed nearby public parking lots, as well as on street parking on Mandalay and Papaya
Street. As discussed we will also include the Hyatt Aqualea garage (764 spaces) as part of the study
area. The total number of spaces in the study area are 1,033 including 8 handicapped spaces.
We will pertorm hourly observations within these lots during the specified time periods:
Friday May 20, 2011: 11 AM - 2 PM and 6 PM - 9 PM.
Saturday May 21, 2011: 10 AM - 4 PM and 6 PM - 9 PM.
Available supply within these areas will be compared to expected parking demand. A written report will be
provided. I usually submit 3 copies. It is expected to be a very warm and sunny weekend, so it is perfect
for doing this study.
Thnaks Tracey for your information on the garage!
Robert Pergolizzi, AICP, PTP
Gulf Coast Consulting, Inc.
13825 ICOT Boulevard, Suite 605
Clearwater, FI 33760
Phone: 727-524-1818
Fax: 727-524-6090
Cellphone: 727-644-2695
email: pergo@gulfcoastconsultinginc.com
5/18/2011
` � � � IqLEN7LU � ` I Y
�� i �
'i7 ��.1.�lCC'S GLEN[IAlE �
5T '� Q
WAY �,
NORTH H6LWUOD M
�y
Nof fo Scale �� _ � �, �
�
< ;�
53 Spaces , AvsT N � �i
y WAY
ST � �
BAY a
} ' 33
�� '
aoauw�r 79 Spaces
i45 Spaces ST
4
G
ti
�'C
W
� ��
T5 Spaces
�
O
��•
�, 23 Spaces
�
`a
�
p�R 60
��.
139 Spaces
i
��_ ,.
,�
�
�
N
233 Spaces � S
�
GV
�
�
�
Q
GV
�
V
� 33 Spaces
� � ��
° 4'1 Spaces
cswr
L___-----
MARINA �
a�
Spaces
'°94ccepting - Visa/Master Card/American Express
Daily max rate - $10.00/$12.50 (where appiicable)
** Seasonal Rate - March through April everyday
***Permit Parking Oniy
9Vot�s: Does not include Handicap Spaces
In�ormatiaro Stabject to Change
���� ;
277l71 * ` k Spaces
MARCNA ACTtVITIES
LEGEND: (n
� City Park �
� Public Beach ■�
� �' City Parking Lot �i
� , Private Parking Lot ��
�
��ro ,�°a`-:� PrivateParkingGarage ■�
����'o,�� �~ On Street Parking V
�. °'Pi °�a � Oversize Vehicle Pkg. �
6°�9� cqG (24°-40' only) �
��q}
4NLY (8arn - 6pm} -----------
C� EA R w,`� T�'R
FIARB�R
�RY\6dtTE PARKINC� _
Open to Public '�
No. Location Rate Information i
A 301 S. Gulfview Blvd. (800) 310-7275 �
B 100 Coronado �r. (813) 770-48Fi1
a
General Parking Information s
(727) 562-4704 V
Parking System Hotline �
(727) 562-4892 m
i
- -:. ��, �
t i r.. , n T x
. .....�....... '�. f L C�
f3��CH 1?vAi.:K �
�
° Clearwater �
�
U�' ��, �
e�\°��Y icr Parking lot #40 - 5AND KEY (1060 GULF BLVD.} ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT V
Dpen: Sun-Up to Sun-Down (All times park g�t� i� o,�esi)
� as3 sQa�es; �i.00��o�r -�a.2s J�m�r tseaso��E � WWW,112yCIeca1'Wc'�l'e1:C0111
t �--� n�
i
�b
Section 3-1405. Shared parking.
DEVELOPMENTSTANDARDS
,---•-�-•---•-•-•• -•-•-•-�-•
' j�= �� ':'� I
I (`�' � _ `a'' I
� — �I
� �� OFFICE — e � �0�
I — I
� � I
I — �
I — � 1
I �"°� THEATER �
I j� I
�✓ I
i _
I
I I
� -•�•---._._._._._.� :�
SHARED PARKING
shared parking dia�ram
§ 3-1405
WEEKDAY WEEKEND
Night Day Evening Day Evening
Midnight 9 a.m. 6 p.m. 9 a.m. 6 p.m.
USE 6 a.m. 4 p.�n. Midnight 4 p.m. Midnight
Residential 100% 60% 90% 80% 90%
Government 5% 100% 0% 0% 0%
Office and Marinas 5% 100% 10% 10% 5%
Retail � ea �� �-� �p �� U{_ �, � 5% -rj 70% (p 90% � 100% r"j 70%
Overnight Accommodations 80% 80% 100% 80% 100%
Restaurant � b� ��,3 s.f -� �q o r J -� 10% ? S 50% 1 p 100% ?. S 50% �J � 100%
Entertainment 10% 40% 100% 80% 100%
Places of Worship 0% 20% 10% 100% 20�%
Others 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%
� �� n� When any land, building or area is used for two or more uses which are listed below, the minimum total
number of required parking spaces shall be determined by the following:
�� L� w Multiply the minimum required parking spaces for each individual use, excluding spaces reserved for
use by specified individuals or classes of individuals, by the appropriate percentage listed in the Table
`1 �o �� 4z `�s
Supp. No. 25 CD3:57
�
j ��L
�
i��
j cv'7��.-
���
h-I IG7
DEVEI,OPMENT STANDARDS
Section 3-1405. Shared parking.
..--------.
I � �
--�� i
I _ ��
� �' OFFICE , I
1 I
I � I
I �
� � I
� ° THEATER �
I � �
� i
i
i �
� -•�----•-------._._�.�_p._.;
SHARED PARKING
shared parking diagram
�-1 i G r(
§ 3-1405
.
WEEKDAY WEEKEND
Night Day Evening D¢y Evening
Midnight 9 a.m. 6 p.m. 9 a.m. 6 p.m.
USE 6 a.m. 4 p.�n. Midnight 4 p.m. Midnight
Residential 100% 60% 90% 80% 90%
Government 5% 100% 0% 0% 0%
Office and Marinas 5% 100% 10% 10% 5%
Retail l�, ` c� ��.� ��� �� � � 5% (� 70% g 90% � 100% (� 70%
Overnight Accommodations 80% 80% 100% 80% 100%
Restaurant �p oC�3 ��' ����,�:,��� � S 10% �� 50% 4c�� 100% -j� 50% �s.f 100%
Entertainment 10% 40% 100% 80% 100%
Places of Worship 0% 20% 10% 100% 20%
Others 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%
When any land, building or area is used for two or more uses which are listed below, the minimum total
number of required parking spaces shall be determined by the following:
Multiply the minimum required parking spaces for each individual use, excluding spaces reserved for
use by specified individuals or classes of individuals, by the appropriate percentage listed in the Table
(S 8Z ri�R�p
Supp. No. 25 CD3:57 �°���~� �-� t��
'� �1
TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY
FOR
HOOTERS AT CLEARWATER BEACH
385 MANDALAY AVENUE
CLEARWATER BEACH, FLORIDA
PREPARED FOR:
387-391 MANDALAY AVENUE, LLC
� : ' : : �1�7:�•ii
GULF COAST CONSULTING,INC.
REVISED JULY 2011
PROJECT # 11-018
�
V
Robert Perg iz , AICP, PTP
AICP #9023, PTP #133
�� ��
I. INTRODUCTION
The 0.19 acre project site is located at 385 Mandalay Avenue and currently
contains a ground floor retail shop and six apartments on the second floor. The
site is proposed to be redeveloped as a mixed use project containing a 8,142
square foot Hooters restaurant, a 1,921 square foot ground floor Starbucks, and a
1,819 square foot specialty retail store (Crocs). The site is located on the east side
of Mandalay Avenue between the roundabout and Papaya Street on Clearwater
Beach (See Figure 1).
The redevelopment of the property is the subject of a Comprehensive Infill
Redevelopment in the Tourist "T" zoning district. This application requires an
assessment of the traffic impacts of development. Prior to completing this
analysis a methodology was established with the City of Clearwater staff.
IT, EXISTING TR.�FIC rc�NDITIONS
The property has frontage on Mandalay Avenue and has access to its small
parking area and dumpsters via a rear alley immediately north of the roundabout.
Mandalay Avenue is a four-lane divided collector roadway between the
roundabout and Baymont Street. Coronado Drive is four lanes between the
roundabout and S. Gulfview Boulevard, and Causeway Boulevard is a four-lane
divided arterial roadway. As specified by Clearwater staff, traffic counts were
conducted between 11 AM - 2 PM and 4- 6 PM on Friday May 20, 2011 at the
following intersections:
Causeway Boulevard / East Shore Drive
Mandalay Avenue / Baymont Street
Coronado Drive / S. Gulfview Boulevard
All traffic counts were converted to annual average equivalents using FDOT
seasonal adjustment factors. Existing traffic volumes are shown in Figure 2.
Existing intersections were analyzed using the HCS+ software. The HCS+
printouts are included in Appendix A.
At the intersection of Causeway Boulevard / East Shore Drive the primary
movements are eastbound-westbound, whereas the southbound approach (East
Shore Drive) is stop controlled. The HCS+ analysis shows the southbound stop-
controlled movements operate at LOS B during both the midday peak hour and
the PM peak hour.
Presently the signalized intersection at Mandalay Avenue / Baymont Street
operates at LOS A with average delay of 7.4 seconds per vehicle during the
midday peak hour, and LOS A with average delay of 7.5 seconds per vehicle
during the PM peak hour.
1
I a L � x
� ��_`, r � � �� '�� " ►� �' ,� � �i � .si� � F Y�r ,^ w.r�"" at, �, ,�
� _� � '
� ,��,�� �t �� ���� ��� , y ' �f
_ � i � � �» � � �,�� I � i
,< ,
� =� - '� , ; y '�i.�. '�' � ,, � r �., � � :•_.�t
.J� + �� � �.; ` '= � ` x�,.:
.+e { �'r" R" 1 �
, .._._-- --�7tf�- e'_, t'-.� � i ` a Lni'� �
. ., . y
� .. �� �......, � � � �f� ��1r�..�f^f i
�. !, �, • �;-f !'�, � �, ....�.� .,.
� i
, � A i � i - � ..
�` , --'1"'�� 4 �Y- � f� M ��x�. T"" �' .i � �����.
,
a ",� + , f i i�"�-�� �,' '
�I
� � i`�t i� +�+r�f�i!+� � �
,+ �
'
:� � `.' � � ,�.
, ' -- � .i� �� � � � . ,r � : 7R � 't . �
__ �s�'� �LL;d`� ' t �� ,"-'i' R + �f �$�ir!
_ �.�'�4�i � � � �l M � ,'!..
� . � � .� � f• ��"�! �.. � �`—. _ ' " ,.1.
��y i'�'��r. �a: i� �„% � �-��w' � r..
:- ��,�
r.
. � � , �� . �
� t� �' ► � , :,; � � u=�� � ��' 'i,��
. .
� �
� ,� �
, . �
�.. �. . ^^��.�� � ' ' � i
��� .�.. ; �'
� .. � � E . �' -��e �
rri I I
��I i i I II� III��.
PROJECT � �
�
..
„� �� ,; .,�' ��'�`
LOCATION -� . � � �t ' � �� �' �`+
�' _ # � ti � � � �� '�� q �-�' � .,
�� I« ��� �
,r , �s' , f"-
� .�y��,� � - yfF. �4���'; , f
��• ��',Jf `� f'� - �,� (i''+k.-' -•-�,fi ��. _�� Y ,
2��� �?' '� �� � .�a�`s,A""�.?w,- �� �• � � +Ri. � ��
�c ����''%`_ �, �. rr x; R I �� ..
� ^ ��.,d 'i` . �~�� --
�,t �'„�, A+ .:.4� �'�!. ' � i ` i t I :�
w. P�,�g � R -�� :'�•�t.�,/�:� � � I �. ��.♦�.
M
���� ._. Y '
... � ._.-� - �-- -�' ci�- "� � .,., ' �' _� � ,'. �� ���� . .. -
� ' ^� 4 c ... . �.. � ' .. � �GJ 1
� q\
_ y,: . �. � , . . l�. ��� \f' ^�R ..o- " :.
.�R �-� ,y�€� � R \ � +� .
. . ,-.. - � .-.. - - _ . ..- � ,
.,..... �... . : � � � � . . . s.—. � 3 __ . . ___ .
= I � a �.. �, . �_� �
.. , . . � - " . +++�wr�� b ' �;� t" �. �i'. . .w� ^ w . �.. — — - —_.
. __
.. . �
,
,._z � �1' • .r � " --- '—
� d l �� � � 1-�i�� l. � 6 Y'y. b� R
L.L �� �tf �1� ������ �
- — _ � , ` � * �� 7E'��' �Nq ��`�` � 1 � j��
' .�...�.w�t 4
�� . ' � I
� � � :� �, ��4 .
� �,
' • . , _� .� � ..�a� � � _
� ,.
___-- � -- �x ,��
_ ,� ! �
?.�
- ,��'� a" oPs � � ie�c� - S�_c f f � E te �
e ���
�w�..� . t -e
�, ! �' • :: � • � • ' .� �S � "
� ieR..�. ' '�; , F, � •' r Q 'ti ) �!t �' f; � �'ii �� '�
' . _.
" • ., �v:�� F ,� � �� � »�t� ` � � t �r
t �; . • �S • . , ✓ b^ z . , . �,zi�.1 . e� NM
� � �.: �g e��Sy R e re �'� ` ,. a-� '�1 � `""''. r ,
:.
�� �r , � ,.Fr..1J _ - -
. e :' ,l. 'h �._�'R�f �H.—:-�•�i� q_. _
� R �� M ;G .S:y;M.1�tF,l'"..�. -, y cZ
'�L 16'
.�� � �,d� 4At �Y��t ��Y � pJ
�
.� � �- . ��I�� � 1 i . �
�s �. � ' • � � .m � � �IM1�I,
^ �, fl,�� rt
: �. �
r , . , �
�
w ,
� �� �� ��
,�'� ' ;� ' ' ,4
. �"�*�? "t"` - .� —
-
,:��' ty , ,?�x_.
�.
w
r
�` ,
,.
� � � -'�'.i'it�c*rr "` � � �,�� . _ �
__�*,�``_" `�
�,•"'�— ` �' _ :• �..
. ;�, ,� , � � , _ �``.`_
"�t� r i_�.� e d�.:°x-� �"�i'P�. �� a �i'•
__ ��� ` _,
tt �i �4, � �,�yy����� �� r .i_
R � a
�� 'I � ( ti �� r '4-�,':, a'a�k .
a- � t � �� j� 't•� r �-+.
�
a
i
� .,� . F. ��,.� j_ .
� � ' . �j'� w �E ti a
.. . . � . . 4 � } +' " I vy k '. ,y��,r`` ,� B
e, _k' �'—'_ f7�',�'n''� "d s. �. e � ►, � � � � { ���� 'f;;r. � w+ � f a�, ��
� �3 t u
� "r ' . M �..` 1 ' ....��e._ ar,;. ��.. sy, ts s � .,.�. �:.�, v � ,;kq _
� 4� � � � ,. �_ y' S, f. . - .....,.�..� . . .. , � _ ..,.,
�P�9�T�C'�' LOCATIOI`�T PROrECT �ro:
ii-0�$
�:,
�Gu�f �C�as� �onsulting, Inc. "ATE: �'GU�:
���� Land Development Consulting 5�201 1
� +��
DRAWN BY:
� I �tKC
� ti M 1
�
0
�
0
�
�
�
O
CL
�
�
0
b
U
�
�
v
m
�
�
�
v
8
_
�
J
W
Z
a
r
�
M
� ^ N
N i�.
� � n
� M M
�J 1 L-�
i 2(�) �
3�g� �
49(41) �
`!� I
� (119)108
-- (5)12
� (19)30
BAYMONT ST
-� f r
�o�
a v �
N � �
�t t0
M
�
O N
.�.. M �
SAN MARCO ST
�
¢' j
PAPAYA ST
�
� ti
4 �
� �
'� O
a
�
M
�v � (117)130 (870)
�(�ss)�aa 878 CAUSEWAY
(s�o) �8�0� BLVD
� „�6 „�6
�b��lti
6�
� �$n,$ MARINA
�o � Q
" "' O
^ M ^
4�{
� � �
��
� 1 �
� � p (XX) = MID-DAY PEAK HOUR
� S� XX = PM PEAK HOUR
� 285(246) � � �
,��' 10(26) � � �
o �.
� M
�
y �
O
�
� � M � n
v � M
� �
EXISTING PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUME (2011)
Gulf Coast Consulting, Inc. DATE:
Land Development Consulting 5�201 1
DRAWN BY:
MKC
A
�
O
�
H
�
W
N
PROJECT NO:
11-018
FIGURE:
� � � a
Presently the signalized intersection at Coronado Drive / S. Gulfview Boulevard
Street operates at LOS A with average delay of 9.5 seconds per vehicle during the
midday peak hour, and LOS A with average delay of 9.7 seconds per vehicle
during the PM peak hour.
Causeway Boulevard is a four-lane divided arterial roadway and according to
FDOT 2009 QLOS Handbook capacity tables has a LOS D capacity of 3,560
vehicles per hour. The segment of Mandalay Avenue is a four-lane divided
collector roadway with a LOS D capacity of 2,900 vehicles per hour, and
Coronado Drive between the roundabout and S. Gulfview is a four-lane divided
collector roadway with a LOS D capacity of 2,900 vehicles per hour, and
Coronado Drive south of S. Gulfview is three lanes with a capacity of 1,550
vehicles per hour.
EXISTING ROADWAY CONDITIONS - 2011
Roadwav Segment Midday�eak Middav LOS PM peak PM LOS
Causeway Blvd 1740 vph LOS B 1984 vph LOS B
Mandalay Ave. 813 vph LOS C 910 vph LOS C
Coronado Dr. 1325 vph LOS C 1480 vph LOS C
Coronado Dr (S. of Gulfview) 757 vph LOS C 929 vph LOS C
As shown above all roadway segments and intersections operate at LOS C or
better during both the midday and PM peak hours.
III. FUTURE TRAFFIC CONDITIONS
Existing traffic was adjusted by a 4% annual growth rate to the expected build-out
year of 2012 to account for background traffic from other nearby redevelopment
proj ects. The site will be developed as a 8,142 square foot Hooters restaurant, a
1,921 square foot Starbucks restaurant, and 1,819 square feet of specialty retail
space, replacing existing retail space and second floor apartments,. Using Institute
of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation, 8�' Edition rates, the amount
of new trips was calculated and estimates are shown below:
TRIP GENER.ATION ESTIMATES
Land Use ITE LUC Amount Dailv Mid-Day PM Peak
Hooters 932 8,142 sf 1035 151 (81/70) 91 (54/37)
Starbucks 933 1,921 sf 1375 101 (51/50) 50 (25/25)
Retail 814 1,819 sf 80 9 5/4 5 2/3
TOTAL 2490 261 (137/124) 146 (81/65)
Based on prior studies of businesses on Clearwater Beach a substantial amount of
the customers are expected to be walk-ups from nearby hotels, the beach itself,
and condominiums in the area. The data from previous studies indicates 38% of
2
i. 4 � �
the customers of beach businesses are staying in nearby hotels or used another
mode of transportation other than a car such as walking, biking, or Jolly Trolley.
The gross vehicle trip generation was reduced by 38% to account for this capture,
and as a result it is estimated the actual vehicle trip generation would be 162
midday peak hour trips (85 entering / 77 exiting), and 91 PM peak hour trips (51
entering / 40 exiting). The expected distribution of vehicular trips is as follows:
10% to / from the north
30% to / from the south
60% to / from the east
PROJECT IMPACT CALCULATIONS (MIDDAY PEAK HOUR)
Proj ect
Road Se�ment Lanes Pro�ect Trips Capacitv Percent
Causeway Blvd. (Roundabout- Island way) 4LD 98 3560 2.75%
Mandalay Ave. (Roundabout — Baymont) �4LD 16 2900 0.55%
Coronado Drive (Roundabout — Gulfview) 4LD 49 2900 1.69%
Coronado Drive (Hamden. — Gulfview) 2LD 49 1550 3.16%
Background traffic and project traffic vehicular traffic were added to determine
total traffic for 2012 and the intersections and roadway segments were reanalyzed.
The future traffic volumes are shown in Figure 3, and the HCS+ printouts are
included in Appendix B.
At the intersection of Causeway Boulevard / East Shore Drive the HCS+ analysis
shows the southbound stop-controlled movements would continue to operate at
LOS B during both the midday peak hour and the PM peak hour.
Under future conditions the signalized intersection at Mandalay Avenue /
Baymont Street would operate at LOS A with average delay of 7.4 seconds per
vehicle during the midday peak hour, and LOS A with average delay of 7.5
seconds per vehicle during the PM peak hour.
Under future conditions the signalized intersection at Coronado Drive / S.
Gulfview Boulevard Street would operate at LOS A with average delay of 9.5
seconds per vehicle during the midday peak hour, and LOS A with average delay
of 9.8 seconds per vehicle during the PM peak hour.
FUTURE ROADWAY CONDITIONS - 2012
Roadwa�Seement Midday�eak MiddaXLOS PM peak PM LOS
Causeway Blvd 1907 vph LOS B 2118 vph LOS B
Mandalay Ave. 863 vph LOS C 955 vph LOS C
Coronado Dr. 1426 vph LOS C 1566 vph LOS C
Coronado Dr (S. of Gulfview) 836 vph LOS C 993 vph LOS C
w l ) l
N
N
� a �
� � r.
� � �
��
� 1 L--►
i z(�) �1
3�g� �
1 51(44) �
0
� � I
M �
..�.. �
SAN MARCO ST
� (124)112
� (5)12
� (20)31
BAYMONTST
� � �
O1 N �
a �o �
� M �
���
�
M
��
N � I� �
� W
� PAPAYA ST Q
�
¢�' �
4 �
� z
°
Q
�
O
�
�
�
�
w
N
� so�
� �
�v �(122)135 _(957)
�-(835)8os 944 CAUSEWAY
(950) _ (950) BLVD
1174 1174
^��� `696 g
� L�go,'I MARiNA
h N Q
� � Q
N M q
lD N �
v � O
v� � � � (XX) = MID-DAY PEAK HOUR
� �, XX = PM PEAK HOUR
� 296(256) J � I
��w 10(27) � o m
�
C{ o
�
y N
� � �
v M O
U �v�
FUTURE PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUME (2012)
Gulf Coast Consulting, Inc. DATE:
��'"" 5/201 1
Land Development Consulting
��" �,
� �' DRAWN BY:
MKC
PROJECT NO:
11-018
FIGURE:
�
� t ) i
As shown above all roadway segments and intersections would continue to
operate at LOS C or better during both the midday and PM peak hours.
IV. CONCLUSION
This analysis was conducted in accordance with a specific methodology
established with City of Clearwater staff. This analysis demonstrates traffic
operations at nearby intersections and on adjacent roadways would continue at
acceptable levels of service during both midday and PM peak hours with the
proj ect impacts.
0
+ i. 1 1
r_����,��.�►:�=�
2009 Pealc Season Factor Category Report - Report Type: ALL
Category: 1500 PINELLAS COUNTYWIDE
MOCF: 0.93
Wee]c Dates SF PSCF
----------------------- --
1 O1/O1/2009 - O1/03/2009 1.10 1.18
2 O1/04/2009 - Ol/10/2009 1.07 1.14
3 O1/11/2009 - O1/17/2009 1.05 1.12
4 01/18/2009 - Ol/24/2009 1.03 1.10
5 O1/25/2009 - Ol/31/2009 1.01 1.08
6 02/O1/2009 - 02/07/2009 0.99 1.06
7 02/08/2009 - 02/14/2009 0.97 1.04
* 8 02/15/2009 - 02/21/2009 0.95 1.02
* 9 02/22/2009-- 02/28/2009 0.94 1.01
*10 03/Ol/2009 - 03/07/2009 0.93 1.00
*11 03/OS/2009 - 03/19/2009 0.92 0.98
*12 03/15/2009 - 03/21/2009 0.91 0.97
*13 03/22/2009 - 03/28/2009 0.91 0.97
*14 03/29/2009 - 04/04/2009 0.92 0_98
*15 04/OS/2009 - 04/11/2009 0.92 0.98
*16 04y12/2009 - 04/18/2009 0.93 1.00
*17 04/19/2009 - 04/25/2009 0.94 1.01
*18 04/26/2009 - OS/02/2009 0.95 1.02
*19 OS/03/2009 - OS/09/2009 0.96 1.03
*20 OS/10/2009 - OS/16/2009 0.97 1.04
21 OS/17/2009 - OS/23/2009 0.97 1.04
22 OS/24/2009 - O5/30/2009 0.97 1.04
23 OS/31/2009 - 06/06/2009 0.97 1.04
24 06/07/2009 - 06/13/2009 0.97 1.04
25 06/14/2009 - 06/20/2009 0.97 1.04
2G 06/21/2009 - 06/27/2009 0.98 1.05
�� �F/7R/7��9 - �7/�4/9��9 n aR i ns
28 07/OS/2009 - 07/11/2009 0.99 1.06
29 07/12/2009 - 07/18/2009 0.99 1.06
30 07/19/2009 - 07/25/2009 1.00 1.07
31 07/26/2009 - OB/O1/2009 1.00 1.07
32 08/02/2009 - 08/08/2009 1.01 1.08
33 08/09/2009 - 08/15/2009 1.01 1.06
34 OB/16/2009 - 08/22/2009 1.03 1.10
35 08/23/2009 - 08/29/2009 1.04 1.11
36 08/30/2009 - 09/OS/2009 1.05 1.12
37 09/06/2009 - 09/12/2009 1.06 1.13
38 09/13/2009 - 09/19/2009 1.07 1.14
39 09/20/2009 - 09/26/2009 1.06 1.13
40 09/27/2009 - 10/03/2009 1.06 1.13
41 10/04/2009 - 10/10/2009 1.05 1.12
42 10/11/2009 - 10/17/2009 1.05 1.12
43 10/18/2009 - 10/24/2009 1.05 1.12
44 10/25/2009 - 10/31/2009 1.06 1.13
45 11/O1/2009 - 11/07/2009 1.07 1.14
46 11/08/2009 - 11/14/2009 1.06 1.16
47 11/15/2009 - 11/21/2009 1.06 1.16
48 11/22/2009 - 11/28/2009 1.09 1.17
99 11/29/2009 - 12/OS/2009 1.09 1.17
50 12/06/2009 - 12/12/2009 1.09 1.17
51 12/13/2009 - 12/19/2009 1.10 1.18
52 12/20/2009 - 12/26/2009 1.07 1.14
53 12/27/2009 - 12/31/2009 1.05 1.12
* Pealc Season
Page 1 of 2
� a • a
Type of peak hour being reported: Intersection Peak
LOCAiION: E Shore Dr -- Causeway Blvd
rirvrGfaTF• Cleanivater Beach. FL
24 0.72 121
J; * �
24 0 0
e► i �.
800 4 0 � L 121 1. 897
0.91 897 +► 0.97 1� 776 0.94
897 �► 0 'i i 0 y 897
� • r
0 0 0
� a t
0 0.00 0
� �Srr�r j �
a � � ,' � o
� �
� O I
J .► i b �
� Z
.► � F
z r
�� t ��
Method for
Peak-Hour: 1:00 PM -- 2:00 PM
Peak 15-Min: 1:45 PM -- 2:00 PM
�
�t.l��i'�� ��3i1�'l��s
� � �� �
�J
---►
�
�
ak hour: Total Entering Volume
QC JOB #: 10618702
QAiE: 5/20/2011
0.0 1.7
J i * �
0.0 0.0 0.0
.! i �.
3.4 « 0.0 1 " R 1•7 IY 3.2
4.2 �► ' ��' « 3.5
42 � 0.0 'i ' i 0.0 �► 4.2
�, t �►
o.o o.o o.o
� a ,►
o.o o.o
0 0 0
�., a a
o s t o
o .► � � o
o z � o
h t f'
� 0 0 0 �
J .7 i 4 L--
� � '� «
�
z �
��► t ��
R• = RTOR
15-Min Count E Shore Dr E Shore Dr Causeway Blvd Causeway Bivd
Period (Northbound) (Southbound) (Eastbound) (Westbound) To�� Hourly
Beginning At Left Thru Ri ht U R" Left Thru Ri ht U R' Left Thru Ri ht U R" Left Thru Ri ht U R' Totals
11:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 212 0 0 0 0 210 22 D 0 446
11:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 203 0 0 0 0 211 22 0 0 439
11:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 183 0 0 0 0 222 26 0 0 436
11:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 175 0 0 0 0 1 BS 37 0 0 405 1726
12:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 206 0 0 0 0 205 23 0 0 436 1716
12:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 199 0 0 0 0 208 31 0 0 446 1723
12:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 169 0 0 0 0 223 33 0 0 432 1719
12:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 195 0 0 0 0 210 27 0 0 438 1752
1:00 PM ' 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 -0 0' 0: 223 0+ 0 0 0 191 28 0' A 446 1762 '
1[15PM 0 0 0 0 0- 0 0 9 0 0 0 219 0 0 0 0 198 41 0 0 467 9783
1:30 PM' 0 D 0 b 0 0 0 6 0 0` 0 209 0 0 0 0 196 26' 0 0 437 1768
� .,: . ,, .:.., . ay%�,.' ., .*. , -M , � ..,,�= r'� , e -::. .'� ➢ . ,�'...`� L�?�Ke ;� 5 , 4? �.. s;r,. .
?�
�> i�= ;�,�`� �
�'
��
Heavy Trucks 0 0 0
Pedestrians 0
Bicycles 0 0 0
Railroad
Sto ed Buses
Comments:
Report generated on 5/25/2011 10:23 AM
�'," --�
0 0 0 0 40 0 0 24 8
�2 p 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total
1872
72
12
0
SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http://www.qualitycounts.net)
x. ►,
Type of peak hour being reported: Intersection Peak
LOCATION: E Shore Dr -- Causeway Blvd
CITYfSTATE: Clearwater Beach, FL
42 0.75 134
�1 ; * �
az o 0
✓ i 4
813 1� 0 � !. 134 � 905
0.96 1140► 0.95 1� 771 0.96
1140�► 0 Z !' 0 �►1140
h f O
0 0 0
�a t
a o.00 a
J � �
2 �.. z�� ,.�' � 0
� � I
� ✓ i b �
> <
�,�«
� s
�M t r►�
Period
�innina At
Method for determi
Peak-Hour: 4:15 PM -- 5:15 PM
Peak 15-Min: 4:15 PM -- 4:30 PM
�
C�u2lit�+ ��,unts
.... .. 4 .. .
� Y
---►
�
�
ak hour: Total Entering Volume
QC JOB #: 10618701
DATE: 5/20/2011
o.o o.o
�+ *�
o.o o.o o.o
.► i 4
2.5 � OA ,r ' L 0.0 � 2.2
"
1.8 �► ` �,:: � 2.6
1.8 +r 0.0 Z ' �' 0.0 �► 1.8
�, t r
o.o o.o o.o
� s f
0.� Q.Q
I � � �
�J .► j 4
p � �R o
5 .► � 4 2
0 `L i 0
'� 4 d
� 0 0 0 �
�.► t 4 �
.t �, <
,► �� «
Z r �
�� t �►�
R` = RTOR
Causeway Blvd
(Vllestbound) Houriy
_. _. . . .. ... T-v`uJ i r_._,_
�� 4t30 PM �0 '� D �� 0 0 0- b 0'' 7 -0 0 �- tl��281 ` �0 0 0`� 0„196 � 34 ' 0�� 0 518 �
4:45 PM A' 0 0 0' 0 0 0 11 0 0 ' 0 2A0''' Q 0 0 0 201 29 ' 0 0 531. 2088
S:OO PM 0 0 0 0 0 ' 0 0 7 0 0 0 271 0 ' 0 0 0 177 35 ' 0 0 490'"- 2087
5:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 0 0 0 275 0 0 0 0 214 27 0 0 527 2066
5:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 0 0 0 268 0 0 0 0 198 33 0 0 515 2063
5:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 0 0 0 226 0 0 0 0 214 27 0 0 481 2013
`�:% = r?.�'°�
4t
�
Heavy Trucks 0 0 0
'i Pedestrians 0
Bicycles 0 0 0
Railroad
Sto ed Buses
Commenfs:
Report generated on 5/25/2011 10:23 AM
_,_._._.�,
�ro�.
0 0 0
44
0 0 0
2._ i 3a
�---
`��B
0 16 0 0 20 0
0 �
o � o o z o
rotal
2192
36
44
3
SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http://www.qualitycounts.net)
Type of peak hour being reported: Intersection Peak
LQCATION: Mandalay Ave -- Baymont St
CITYISTATE: Clearwater Beach, F
414 0.90 481
J + * L�
13 363 38
.► i 4
60 4 7 � t 123 1. 147
078 8 .► 0.94 � 5 0.76
57 � 42 Z i 19 �► 60
'4 1 I'
48 351 14
� i t
430 0.95 413
� � I�
94 � � �,:` � 61
�
� 80 �
� d i b �
.� <
.. ,� «
z �
� `1 t f' �
Method for determi
Peak-Hour: 12:45 PM -- 1:45 PM
Peak 15-Min: 1:15 PM --1:30 PM
�
C�UaL�t� �e�u�ts
.. � ,�` .... .
� '1 1'
�
�
ak hour: Total Entering Volume
QC JOB #: 10618704
QATE: 5/20/2011
5.B 4.6
�+ * �
23.1 5.5 2.6
J i 4
6.7 �0.0 1 L 2.4« 2.7
0 0 �► ' � `:k' 1. 0.0
3.5 � 4.8 7 ' � 5.3 �► 1.7
h t P
2.1 5.4 0.0
� i t
5.3 4.B
0 1 0
� .► i �.
0 � �t 2
2 � � � 0
� 0 f � 0
h t �
�'
� 0 0 0
� � �
Period (Northbound) (Southbountl) �tassoo
�ginning At Left Thru Ri ht U R* Left Thru Ri ht U R* Left Thru Ri t
11:00 AM 9 89 6 1 1 7 77 4 0 0 2 2 6
11:15 AM 5 73 10 0 0 9 78 1 0 0 0 0 6
11:30 AM 2 89 3 1 0 6 85 3 0 0 0 0 4
11:45 AM 8 79 3 0 1 7 72 2 0 0 2 0 7
12:00 PM 11 71 4 1 0 14 95 2 0 0 2 0 4
12:15 PM 8 87 1 2 0 9 75 1 0 0 3 0 8
12:30 PM 6 93 7 1 0 7 71 3 0 0 1 0 2
12:451PM 9 100 - 3 0 0 15 95 2 0 1 3 0 3
1:00 PM 10'' 78 4 2, 0 ! 4 96 ' 4 0 0 3 3 11
�; � , ;
. , ,t ,. � - �. , � �t ,�« : . � a . 4� . _ �,
1:30 PM 8 60 4 3 0 10 88 " 3 b 0` 0 1 7
1:45 PM 4 81 8 0 0 10 104 1 0 1 3 1 3
3 '
SF , �,^--� '3 �` '�"
� ��
� —�` �—"�
Y� �y
40 _-7 .��9
q :� ` �
�ti�� t4-
Heavy Trucks 0 24 0 0 20 4
Pedestrians 132 64
Bicycles 0 0 0 0 1 0
Railroad
Sto ed Buses
Commenfs:
Report generated on 5/25/2011 10:23 AM
0 0 0
100
0 2 0
J .� i 4 I-.
.. �� «
z �
� h t P �
R' = RTOR
St Baymont St
nd) (Westbound) Total Hourly
U R* Left Thru Ri ht U R' Totals
0 12 3 0 15 1 5 240
0 3 6 1 19 0 6 217
0 2 3 2 22 0 0 222
0 10 4 3 23 0 1 222 901
0 6 6 0 22 0 1 239 900
0 2 3 2 23 0 2 226 909
0 1 8 4 19 0 2 225 912
0 4: 3 2 27 0^ 5 272, 962-
0 3 4 9 23 0 2 248 971,
0 4 4 1 25 0 0 238"- 1031
0 8 10 3 28 0 0 265 1024
0 0 4
72
0 0 0
Total
1092
52
368
3
SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http://www.qualitycounts.net)
� a � !
ype of peak hour being reported: Intersection Peak Method for determining peak hour: Total Entering Volume
LOCATION: Mandalay Ave -- Baymont St QC JOB #: 10618703
CITY/STATE: Clearwater Beach FL DATE: 5/20/2011
512 0.92 469 Peak-Hour: 4:30 PM -- 5:30 PM z.a z.s
�; * I Peak 15-Min: 4:45 PM -- 5:00 PM � a t�
16 453 43 I 0.0 2.6 2.3
d i b L- .► i�.
66 4 12 � f. 111 �. 154 0.0 f 8.3 ,t ' � 3.6 1. 3.9
0.65 3 �► 0.91 �. 12 0.95 0.0 �► �±-' F 0.0
65 � 50 3 i 31 �► 60 3.1 +► 2A 7 ` t 6.5 �► 17
�'h t r' � h t �
i 3� t� �113�i�'�' �i�U�'i�5 � a 2.o t�
539 0.92 403 .,. i r .,. -� i , ........
2.8 1.7
� 33 I
�. L•'_
172�:: � ,;�' � 54
��-'--'�`'�
� 112 �
J .% i t. L�.
> L
» � �.
7. i
�'! t P �
� � �
�
�
Period (Northbound) ��ousnoouna�
�inning At Left Thru Riqht U R* Left Thru Right U R"
4:00 PM 11 69 4 2 0 12 99 2 0 3
4:15 PM 9 71 6 2 0 15 103 4 0 0
I 0 0 1
�1.► � 4
o � �` ,
0 �► � « 0
� 0 i � o
h t �'
� � 0 0 0 �
�l f� �
7 0
�I .► i 4 �
.► �t «
Z r �
�h * f'�
R* = RTOR
Baymont St
_ (Westbound) _ To�� Hourly
5 32 0
5:00 PM" 10 ' 79 3�Y 1 0 B 128 ^ 2 A 0 3 1:: 4 0 3' B 3 30 : 0 ' 3 285 ', 1121
5:15PM 5 100 5 1 0 13 1d5 4 ` 0 0 : 2 0 9 0 3 10 -"1 19 A 0 277 1134
5:30 PM 10 77 6 2 1 10 93 2 D 0 1 8 12 0 5 7 2 21 0 0 257 1130
5:45 PM 10 87 2 0 0 4 95 2 0 0 0 2 6 0 2 7 1 16 0 1 237 1056
G'�.i : a.c'1��.
��a����
� � -�> �
l Z '�.. �oc�
:� ��' �-- I Z
�t �i ---�� �--- °� �
� � �
q2�T�f�_.
Heavy Trucks 0 20 0 0 16 0
Pedestrians 84 5z
Bicycles 0 0 0 0 0 0
Railroad
Sto ed Buses
Comments:
Report generated on 5/25/2011 10:23 AM
0 0 0
136
0 0 0
R Thru`Riaht �U R* Total
4 12 116 0 4 1244
8 0 4 48
56 328
0 0 D 0
SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http://www.qualitycounts.net)
v � ♦ '
Type of peak hour being reported: Intersection Peak
LOCATION: Coronado Dr -- S Gulfview Blvc
GITYISTATE: Clearwater Beach FL
663 0.93 703
�a *�
360 303 0
.+ a +.
360 � 25a = L a�. o
0.92 0 +► 0.97 �. 0 0.00
281 +► 27 �l i 0�► 0
Period
Method for determi
Peak-Hour: 12:15 PM --1:15 PM
Peak 15-Min: 12:15 PM --12:30 PM
�1 * P �,
� aas o i��113��"�',� �Li�.1Ti�S
�a t�
331 0.93 450 -'... F �'. -. .
� � L�
4 � . � ;' � 0
�
� 45 �
J� i t.�
> <
� ,� «
i �
� `1 t l' �
unt Coronado Dr
�JJ11
1
�
�
ak hour: Total Entering Volume
QC JOB #: 10618706
3.5 4.8
�+ * �
2.5 4.6 0.0
,� a a
2.5 � 5.9 1 L 0.0 t 0.0
0.0 ♦ ' �� i� 0.0
6.0 �► 7A 7 " � 0.0 �► 0.0
�, t r►
0.0 4.2 0.0
� i t
4.8 4.2
0 1 0
� d i �.
o S V t 0
0 .► � F 0
o � � a
h t �'
� 0 1 0 �
� d i 4 �
TT� ���«
a
z r
�h t f'�
R' = RTOR
S Gulfview Blvd S Gulfview Blvd
(Eastbound) (Westbound) Total Hourly
Thru Ri ht U R* Left Thru Ri ht U R* Totals
0 3 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 358
11:15 AM 0 112 0 0 0 0 74 98 0 0 53 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 339
11:30 AM 0 101 0 0 0 0 88 87 0 0 62 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 342
11:45 AM 0 94 0 0 0 0 58 92 0 0 49 0 4 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 298 1337
12:00 PM 0 110 0 0 0 0 78 68 0 0 48 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 308 1287
��r � �a .
,- , . � �,. � � ,
12:30PM 0' 99 „ 0 0 0 0 64 :; 99 0 0 61 0: 3 `0 0�' 0 0 0; 0'' `0 326 : 1291"
: 12:4BPM 0 113 0 0 0 0` 79 ' 83 0 0- 65 0' 9 " 0 2? 0 '' 0 0` 0 0 351 `' 134d
1:00 PM 0 117' 0 0 0 0 78 ' 81 0' ` 0 76 A 6 0 0` 0'' 0 0 0 0 358 ` 1394`
1:15 PM 0 106 0 0 0 0 75 84 0 0 72 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 340 1375
1:30 PM 0 107 0 0 0 0 77 76 0 0 65 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 326 1375
1:45 PM 0 117 0 0 0 0 71 83 0 0 74 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 351 1375
�;"7�'" S� ��{ •.�-f"�✓���
� *Y
2A �
�:��-��� � �
� 93�n
Heavy Trucks 0 12 0
Pedestrians 60
Bicycles 0 0 0
Railroad
Sto ed Buses
, Commenfs:
Report generated on 5/25/2011 10:23 AM
0 16 6 8 0 4 0 0 0
0 4 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total
1436
48
64
0
SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http://vwvw.qualitycounts.net)
., ..
ype of peak hour being reported: Intersection Peak
LOCATfON: Coronado Dr -- S Gulfview Bivd
CiTY(STATE: Clearwater Beach, FL
652 0.93 857
�+ * �
285 367 0
� i �.
285 � 294 ,? t 0� 0
o.a5 0� 0.93 � o 0.00
304 +► 10 Z � 0�► 0
Method for determining peak hour: Total Entering Volume
QC JOB #: 10618705
DATE: 5/20/2011
Peak-Hour: 4:00 PM -- 5:00 PM
Peak 15-Min: 4:00 PM -- 4:15 PM
'h ♦ (� �
0 563 0 �����.�.�f ������
� i * �r
377 0.93 563 '
� � L.�
9 � . � ,> � 0
� � �
� ,► i b l--
,� <
»,�«
Z �
� '1 t P �
�JJ11
1
�
�
Coronado
�
I I �
S
Period (Northbound) (soumoouna� �cascovuna�
Beginning At Left Thru Ri ht U R" Left Thru Ri ht U R" Left Thru Ri ht U R*
3 1
4:15 FM 0 152 0 0` 0" 0 90 71 0 0 78 0 3 0 1'
4:30 PM 0 137 . 0 0 0 0 84 ' 62 U 0 65 0 2 ' 0 0
4:45 PM 0 123 ' 0 0 0 0 95 75 D 0 71 0` 2 0 1
5:00 PM 0 145 0 0 0 0 92 77 0 0 76 0 2 0 0
5:15 PM 0 121 0 0 0 0 80 85 1 0 93 0 0 0 0
5:30 PM 0 134 0 0 0 0 81 62 0 0 72 0 0 0 0
5:45 PM 0 125 0 0 0 0 92 63 0 0 58 0 4 0 0
�� �'`�'�� � c'"]io ��:t��
� �
� i�e�». ,��
,:. G �,
( O -��,_� E� �
b
:� 3�n
Heavy Trucks 0 4 0
! Pedestrians 8
Bicycles 0 3 0
Railroad
Sto ed Buses
Commenfs:
Report generated on 5/25/2011 10:23 AM
0 8 12 B 0 0
0 4
0 0 1 0 0 0
z.e �.s
�a *�
3.2 2.5 0.0
.� i 4
3z � 2.a J � t o.o � o.o
00 •► <�;;� � o.o
z.s .► �0.07 � o.a •► o.a
h t P'
o.o �.a o.o
�a t
2.7 1.4
2 1 0
�.� i 4
1 1 �` O
0 �► � � 0
o � � o
h t P
� 0 9 0 �
� .� i 4 �
•► '� «
i r �'
�h t �'�
R' = RTOR
S Gulfview Blvd
_ (Westbound) ^ Total Hourly
0 A 0' ' D 0 395 "
D 0 0` 0 0 350
p 0 0 0 0 367 1519
0 0 0 0 0 392 1504
0 0 0 0 0 380 1489
0 0 0 0 0 349 1488
0 0 0 0 0 342 1463
0 0 0
0
0 0 0
rotal
1628
32
12
4
SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http://www.qualitycounts.net)
Two-Wa� Stop Control
TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY
General Information Site Information
nal st RP Intersection
enc /Co. GCC Jurisdiction
Date Performed 5/25/2011 nalvsis Year
nal sis Time Period MIDDAY PEAK
Project Description
EastJWest Street: CAUSEWAY BLVD
Intersection Orientation: East-West
Vehicle Volumes and Ad'ustments
Ma'or Street Eastbound
Movement � 2
L T
Volume veh/h 870
Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 0.97
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR p 896
veh/h
Percent Heavy `J�hicles 0 --
Median Type
RT Channelized
Lanes
Configuration
IUpstream Signal
Minor Street
�
�
�
�
�
2
T
0
-
Northbound
8
T
Peak-Hour Factor, PHF � 1.00
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR � 0
veh/h
Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0
Percent Grade (%) 0
Flared Approach N
Storage �
RT Channelized
Lanes 0 0
Configuration
Dela , Queue Len th, and Level of Service
Approach Eastbound Westbound
Movement 1 4
Lane Configuration
v (veh/h)
C (m) (veh/h)
Page 1 of 1
1SEWAY/EAST
�RE
:ARWATER
1 EXISTING
3outh Street: EAST SHORE (RT ONL
Period (hrs): 0.25
��
��
--
�� ��
��
��
-. .
�_
��'�
�
�
�
��
�
0
V
�
Northbound
7 8
�
�
�
��
�
n
0
E
Westbound
5 6
T R
753 117
0.97 0.97
776 120
0
2 0
T TR
0
Southbound
11 12
T R
23
1.00 0.97
0 23
0 2
0
N
0
0
0 1
R
Southbound
10 11 12
R
23
609
0. 04
0 12
y5 io queue iengtn •
Control Delay (s/veh) � �- �
LOS B
pproach Delay (s/veh) -- -- 1 �• �
pproach LOS -- -- B
Copyright O 2010 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.6 Generated: 5/25/2011 3:03 PM
file://C:\Documents and Settings�rpergolizzi.GULFCOAST\Local Settings\Temp\u2k43.tmp 5/25/2011
Two-Wa� Stop Control
eneral Information
nalyst
qency/Co.
ate Performed
nalvsis Time Period
TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY
Site Information
p Intersection
CC Jurisdiction
�25/2011 nal sis Year
M PEAK
=ast/West Street: CAUSEWAY BLVD
ntersection Orientation: Easf West
Vehicle Volumes and Ad'ustments
Ma'or Street Eastbound
Movement � 2
L T
Volume veh/h 1106
Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 0.95
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR � 1164
veh/h
Percent Heavy Vehicl�s 0 --
Median Type
RT Channelized
Lanes
Configuration
IUpstream Signal
Minor Street
�
�
�
2
T
0
Nort- d
8
T
Page 1 of 1
JSEWAY / EAST
�RE
:ARWATER
1 EXIST/NG
3outh Street: EAST SHORE (RT ONL
Period (hrs): 0.25
��
��
--
�� �i
��
��
-. .
�-
�'�
��
��
Westbound
5
T
748
0. 95
787
2
T
0
Sout-
11
T
�
�
�
�•
�
�
�
�
�
i%�
12
R
�olume veh/h 41
Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR � 0 0 0 0 42
veh/h
Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 2
Percent Grade (%) 0 �
Flared Approach N N
Storage 0 0
RT Channelized 0 0
Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 1
Confi uration R
Dela , Queue Len th, and Level of Service
Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12
Lane Configuration R
v (veh/h) 42
C (m) (veh/h)
598
v/c 0. 07
95% queue length 0.23
Control Delay (s/veh) 11.5
LOS B
pproach Delay (s/veh) -- -- 11.5
pproach LOS -- -- B
Copyright O 2010 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.6 Generated: 5/25/2011 3:06 PM
file://C:\Documents and Settings�rpergolizzi.GULFCOAST\Local Settings\Temp\u2k43.tmp 5/25/2011
l�etailed Report Page 1 of 1
HCS+'" DETAILED REPORT
Genera/ Information Site Information
Analyst RP Intersection MANDALAY/BAYMONT
Agency or Co. GCC Area Type A!I other areas
Date Performed 5/25/2011 Jurisdiction CLEARWATER
Time Period M/DDAY PEAK Analysis Year 2011 EXISTING
Project ID
Volume and Timin In ut
EB WB NB SB
LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT
Number of Lanes, N� 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 2 0
Lane Group LTR LTR LTR LTR
Volume, V(vph) 7 8 41 19 5 119 47 340 14 37 352 13
% Heavy Vehicles, %HV 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.94 0.93 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94
Pretimed (P) or Actuated (A) A A A A A A A A A A A A
Start-up Lost Time, I� 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0
Extension of Effective Green, e 2.0 2•0 2•0 2'0
Arrival Type, AT 3 3 3 3
Unit Extension, UE 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0
Filtering/Metering, I 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000
Initial Unmet Demand, Qb 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Ped / Bike / RTOR Volumes 94 0 15 61 0 11 80 0 0 51 0 0
Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0
Parking / Grade / Parking N 0 N N 0 N N D N N 0 N
Parking Maneuvers, Nm
Buses Stopping, Ns 0 0 0 0
Min. Time for Pedestrians, GP 3.6 3.5 3.6 3.4
Phasing EW Perm 02 03 04 NS Perm 06 07 08
G= 14.0 G= G= G= G= 38.0 G= G= G=
Timing Y= 4 Y= Y= Y= Y= 4 Y= Y= Y=
Duration of Analysis, T= 0.25 Cycle Length, C= 60.0
Lane Grou Ca aci , Contro/ Dela , and LOS Determirtation
EB WB NB SB
LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT
Adjusted Flow Rate, v 44 140 427 42�
Lane Group Capacity, c 381 372 1959 2007
v/c Ratio, X 0.12 0.38 0.22 0.21
Total Green Ratio, g/C 0.23 0.23 0.63 0.63
Uniform Delay, d� 18.1 19.3 4•7 4•�
Progression Factor, PF 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000
Delay Calibration, k 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11
Incremental Delay, d2 0.1 0.6 0.1 0.1
Initial Queue Delay, d3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Control Delay 18.3 20.0 4.7 4.7
Lane Group LOS B B A A
Approach Delay 18.3 20.0 4.7 4.7
Approach LOS 8 8 A A
Intersection Delay 7.4 X� = 0.26 Intersection LOS A
Copyright �O 2007 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.3 Generated: 5/25/2011 322 PM
file://C:\Documents and Settings�rpergolizzi.GULFCOAST\Local Settings\Temp\s2k5C.tmp 5/25/2011
Detailed Report Page 1 of 1
HCS+�' DETAILED REPORT
General Information Siie Information
Analyst RP Intersection MANDALAY/BAYMONT
Agency or Co. GCC Area Type A/l other areas
Date Performed 5/25/2011 Jurisdiction CLEARWATER
Time Period PM PEAK Analysis Year 2011 EX/STING
Project ID
Volume and Timin In ut
EB WB NB SB
LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT
Number of Lanes, N� 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 2 0
Lane Group LTR LTR LTR LTR
Volume, V(vph) 12 3 49 30 12 108 42 336 14 42 439 16
% Heavy Vehicles, %HV 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91
Pretimed (P) or Actuated (A) A A A A A A A A A A A A
Start-up Lost Time, I� 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0
Eutension of Effective Green, e 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0
Arrival Type, AT 3 3 3 3
Unit Extension, UE 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0
Filtering/Metering, I 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000
Initial Unmet Demand, Qb 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Ped / Bike / RTOR Volumes 172 0 15 54 0 11 112 0 0 33 0 0
Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0
Parking / Grade / Parking N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N
Parking Maneuvers, Nm
Buses Stopping, Ne 0 0 0 0
Min. Time for Pedestrians, Gp 4.0 3.4 3.7 3.3
Phasing EW Perm 02 03 04 NS Perm 06 07 08
G= 14.0 G= G= G= G= 38.0 G= G= G=
Timing Y= 4 Y= Y= Y= Y= 4 Y= Y= Y=
Duration of Analysis, T= 0.25 Cycle Length, C= 60.0
Lane Grou Ca aci , Control Dela , and LOS Determination
EB WB NB SB
LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT
Adjusted Flow Rate, v 53 153 430 546
Lane Group Capacity, c 364 368 1946 2004
v/c Ratio, X 0.15 0.42 0.22 0.27
Total Green Ratio, g/C 0.23 0.23 0.63 0.63
Uniform Delay, d� 18.3 19.5 4.7 4.9
Progression Factor, PF 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000
Delay Calibration, k 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11
Incremental Delay, d2 0.2 0.8 0.1 0.1
Initial Queue Delay, d3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Control Delay 18.4 20.3 4.7 4.9
Lane Group LOS 8 C A A
Approach Delay 18.4 20.3 4.7 4.9
Approach LOS B C A A
Intersection Delay 7.5 X� = 0.31 Intersection LOS A
Copyright �O 2007 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS+rM Version 5.3 Generated: 5/25/2011 3:25 PM
file://C:\Documents and Settings�rpergolizzi.GULFCOAST\Local Settings\Temp\s2k5C.tmp 5/25/2011
petaalec� Report Page 1 of 1
HCS+'" DETAILED REPORT
Genera/ lnformation Site Information
Analyst RP I ntersection CORONADO / GULFVIEW
Agency or Co. GCC Area Type A/l other areas
Date Performed 5/25/2011 Jurisdiction CLEARWATER
Time Period M/DDAY PEAK Analysis Year 2011 EX/STING
Project ID
Volume and Timin In ut
EB WB NB SB
LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT
Number of Lanes, N� 2 0 0 2 2 2
Lane Group L LR LT T R
Volume, V(vph) 246 26 1 436 294 349
% Heavy Vehicles, %HV 2 2 2 2 2 2
Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97
Pretimed (P) or Actuated (A) A A A A A A
Start-up Lost Time, I� 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0
Extension of Effective Green, e 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0
Arrival Type, AT 3 3 3 3 3
Unit Extension, UE 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0
Filtering/Metering, I 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000
Initial Unmet Demand, Qb 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Ped / Bike / RTOR Volumes 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 45 0 0
Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0
Parking / Grade / Parking N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N
Parking Maneuvers, Nm
Buses Stopping, Na 0 0 0 0 0
Min. Time for Pedestrians, Gp 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.4
Phasing EB Only 02 03 04 NS Perm 06 07 08
G= 22.0 G= G= G= G= 30.0 G= G= G=
Timing Y= 4 Y= Y= Y= Y= 4 Y= Y= Y=
Duration of Analysis, T= 0.25 Cycle Length, C= 60.0
Lane Grou Ca aci , Control Dela , and LOS Determinafion
EB WB NB SB
LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT
Adjusted Flow Rate, v 254 27 450 303 360
Lane Group Capacity, c 1260 580 1693 1774 1402
v/c Ratio, X 0.20 0.05 0.27 0.17 0.26
Total Green Ratio, g/C 0.37 0.37 0.50 0.50 0.50
Uniform Delay, d� 13.0 12.2 8.6 8.2 8.6
Progression Factor, PF 9.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000
Delay Calibration, k 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11
Incremental Delay, d2 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.1
Initial Queue Delay, d3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Control Delay 13.1 12.3 8.7 8.2 8.7
Lane Group LOS 8 8 A A A
Approach Delay 13.0 8.7 8.5
Approach LOS 8 A A
Intersection Delay g.5 X� = 0.24 Intersection LOS A
Copyright O 2007 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.3 Generated: 5/25/2011 3:35 PM
file://C:\Documents and Settings�rpergolizzi.GULFCOAST\Local Settings\Temp\s2k7E.tmp 5/25/2011
Deta.iled Report Page 1 of 1
HCS+'� DETAILED REPORT
Genera/ lnformation Site lnformaiion
Analyst RP Intersection CORONADO/GULFV/EW
Agency or Co. GCC Area Type A/l other areas
Date Pertormed 5/25/2011 Jurisdiction CLEARWATER
Time Period PM PEAK Analysis Year 2011 EXISTING
Project ID
Volume and Timin In ut
EB WB NB SB
LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT
Number of Lanes, N� 2 0 0 2 2 2
Lane Group L LR LT T R
Volume, V(vph) 285 10 0 563 356 276
% Heavy Vehicles, %HV 2 2 2 2 2 2
Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93
Pretimed (P) or Actuated (A) A A A A A A
Start-up Lost Time, I� 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0
Extension of Effective Green, e 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0
Arrival Type, AT 3 3 3 3 3
Unit Extension, UE 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0
Filterin /Metering, I 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 9.000
Initial Unmet Demand, Qb D.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Ped / Bike / RTOR Volumes 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 45 0 0
Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0
Parking / Grade / Parking N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N
Parking Maneuvers, Nm
Buses Stopping, NB 0 0 0 0 0
Min. Time for Pedestrians, Gp 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.4
Phasing EB Only 02 03 04 NS Perm 06 07 08
G= 22.0 G= G= G= G= 30.0 G= G= G=
Timing Y= 4 Y= Y= Y= Y= 4 Y= Y= Y=
Duration of Analysis, T= 0.25 Cycle Length, C= 60.0
Lane Grou Ca aci , Control Dela , and LOS Determination
EB WB NB SB
LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT
Adjusted Flow Rate, v 306 11 605 383 297
Lane Group Capacity, c 1260 580 1774 1774 1402
v/c Ratio, X 0.24 0.02 0.34 0.22 0.21
Total Green Ratio, g/C 0.37 0.37 0.50 0.50 0.50
Uniform Delay, d� 13.2 12.1 9.0 8.4 8.4
Progression Factor, PF 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000
Delay Calibration, k 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11
Incremental Delay, d2 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1
Initial Queue Delay, d3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Control Delay 13.3 12.1 9.2 8.5 8.5
Lane Group LOS 8 8 A A A
Approach Delay 13.3 9.2 8•5
Approach LOS 8 A A
Intersection Delay g.7 X� = 0.30 Intersection LOS A
Copyright �O 2007 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.3 Generated: 5/25/2011 3:38 PM
file://C:\Documents and Settings�rpergolizzi.GULFCOAST\Local Settings\Temp\s2k7E.tmp 5/25/2011
:�
TABLE 4 Generalized Pe�k Hour �°'wo-Way Volumes for Florida's
Urbanized Areas �oi4i�o
STATE SIGNALIZED ARTERIALS FREEWAYS
CI3SS I(>0.00 to 1.99 signalized intersections per mile) Lanes B C D E
L,anes Median B C D E 4 4,000 5,500 6,770 7,300
2 Undivided 930 1,500 1 *** 6 6,000 8,320 10,150 11,290
4 Divided 2,840 3,440 3 560 *** 8 8,000 11,050 13,480 15,270
6 Divided 4,370 5,200 5,360 *** 10 10,000 13,960 16,930 19,250
8 Divided 5,900 6,970 7,160 *** 12 13,730 18,600 21,950 23,230
�����`� Freeway Adjustments
C1aSS II (2.00 to 4.50 sigialized intersections per mile) Auxiliary Ramp
Lanes Median B C D E Lanes Metering
2 Undivided ** 1,020 1,480 1,570 + 1,800 + 5%
4 Divided ** 2,420 3,220 3,400
6 Divided ** 3,790 4,880 5,150 UNINTERRUPTED FLOW HIGHWAYS
� Divided ** 5,15�) 6153� 6,880
�D e�-tY 1 u`t 1� S Lanes Median B C D E
l.P Ct-i`4 Cr���3et4r�.'t� 2V0�% ZCtOD
Class III/IV (more than 4.50 signalized intersections per mile) 2 Undivided 730 1,460 2,080 2,620
Lanes Median B C D E 4 Divided 3,220 4,660 6,040 6,840
2 Undivided ** 500 1,150 1,440 6 Divided 4,840 6,990 9,060 10,280
4 Divided ** 1,220 2,730 3,100 Uninterrupted Flow Highway Adjustments
6 Divided ** 1,910 4,240 4,680 Lanes Median Exclusive left lanes Adjustrnent factors
8 Divided ** 2,620 5,770 6,280 2 Divided Yes +5%
Multi Undivided Yes -5%
Multi Undivided No -25°/a
Non-State Signalized Roadway Adjustments BICYCLE MODE2
(Alter corresponding state volumes by the indicated percent.) (Mulriply motorized vehicle volumes shown below by number of directional
roadway lanes to detemune two-way maxunum service volumes.)
Major City/County Roadways - 10% Paved Shoulder/ Bicycle Lane
Other Signalized Roadways - 35% Coverage B C D E
0-49% ** 310 1,180 >1,180
State & Non-State Signalized Roadway Adjustments so-s4% 240 360 >360 ***
(Alter corresponding state wlumes by the indicated percent.) 85-100% fi20 >620 *** ***
Divided/iJndivided & Turn Lane Adjustments Z
Exclusive Exclusive Adjustment PEDESTRIAN MODE
Lanes Median Left Lanes Right Lanes Faa (Mulriply motorized vehicle volumes shown below by number of d'uectional
2 Divided Yes No +5° roadway lanes to determine two-way maximum service volumes.)
2 Undivided No No -20% Sidewalk Coverage B C D E
Mulri Undivided Yes No -5% 0-49% ** ** 480 1,390
Multi Undivided No No -25% 50-84% ** ** 1,100 1,82�
- - - Yes + 5% 85-100% ** 1,100 1,820 >1,820
One-Way Facility Adjustment BUS MODE (Scheduled Fixed Route)3
(Buses in peak hour in peak direction)
Multiply the coxresponding two-directional volumes in this table by 0.6. S idewalk Coverage B C D E
0-84% >5 >4 >3 >2
ss-1oo°ro >4 >3 >2 >1
� Values shown are presented as hourly rivo-way volumes for levels of service and aze for the automobile/truck modes unless specifically stated. Akhough presented as peak hour two-
way volumes, they actually represent peak hour peak direction conditions with an applicable D factor applied. Tlus table does not constitute a standazd and should be used only for
general planning applications. The computer models from wluch ttus table is derived should be used for more specific planning applications. The table and deriving computer models
should not be used for corridor or intersection design, where more refined techniques exist. Calculations are based on planning applicarions of the Highway Capacity Manual, Bic}�cle
LOS Model, Pedesuian LOS Model and Transit Capacity and Quality of Service Manual, respectively for the automobileftruck, bicycle, pedesh-ian and bus modes.
Z Level of service for the bicycle and pedesuian modes in this table is based on number of motorized vehicles, not number of
bicyclists or pedestrians using the facility.
3 Buses per hour shown are only for the peak bour in the single duection of the lvgher haffic flow. S021YC2:
** Cannot be achieved using table input value defiults. - FIOPld3 Dep3TfIl1EriY Of 1'T'anSpOI't3t10ri
S stems Plannin Office
*** Not applicable for that level of service letter grade. For the automobile mode, volumes greater than level of service D Y g
become F because intersecrion capacities have been reached. For the bicycle mode, the level of service letter grade (including 6�� SUW3TLIl0e StTOet, MS 19
F) is not achievable because there is no ma�cimum veMcle volume threshold using table input value defaults. T311311a5S0e, FL 32399-0450
www.dot.state.fl.us�lannin�vstems/sm/los/default.shtm 2009 FDOT QUALITY/LEVEL OF SERVICE HANDBOOK
�. ,� ,,
High�Turnover (Si$�Down) Restaurant
(9�2)
Average Vehicle Trip Ends vs: '1000 Sq. Feet Gross Floor qrea
On a: 4Neekday
Number of Studies: 14
Average 1000 Sq. Feet GFA: 7
Directional Distribution: 50% entering, 50% exiting
Trip Generation per 1000 Sq. Feet Gross Floor Area
Average Rate
127.15
Data Plot and Equation
1,500
1,400
1, 300
� 1,200
�
c
W
Q
� 1,100
m
U
L
� 1,000
�
c6
a� 900
a'
u
~ soo
�oo
600
500
Range of Rates
73.51 - 246.00
Standard Deviation
41.77
-- - - - �
-
�--
X,
-
�'
X
'X - -
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ' . _ .� _ _ . _ .
X
X
- - - - X - , -
X
x
X :
x -
X
x,
,-_... - ... - - --
, - - I
X
4 5 6 7 8 9 10 �1 12
X Actual Data Points
Fitted Curve Equation: Not given
Trip Generation, 8th Edition
X= 1000 Sq. Feet Gross Floor Area
1795
------ Average Rate
R2 _ ****
Institute of Transportation Engineers
r • �� � �
Fligh-Turnover (Sit-Down) Restaurant
(932)
Average Vehicle Trip Ends vs: 1000 Sq. Feet Gross Floor Area
On a: Weekday,
P.M. Peak Hour of Generator
Number of Studies: 31 �,.._,_. �...� t'W �=�
Average 1000 Sq. Feet GFA: 5
Directional Distribution: 54% entering, 46% exiting
Trip Generation per y 000 Sq. Feet Gross Floor Area
Average Rate
18.49
Data Plot and Equation
�
a
c
W
Q
F-
a�
U
.0
N
>
m
�
c�
�
>
Q
I I
H
220
zio
zoo
190
180
170
160
150
140
130
120
110
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
Range of Rates
5.60 - 69.20
Standard Deviation
13.32
� - X -- � - - - �
;-'
;.. — ; ; - X � --
X -' � - - - -
X
- � � - - - -
X :
...... ....�..,.X._�'�.:._...... ...__._X L-X-'-.
, X
, -.k -X
�'. X
; - - �
-
, -
, X- .
XX .. �..
X
; ;C .' X h � - • •
X
� �X X X • � - �
� X-X - • - - - -
X
- - �;' ° � � -
; X ;.. � - ;
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
X Actual Data Points
Fitted Curve Equation: Not given
X= 1000 Sq. Feet Gross Floor Area
------ Average Rate
R2 _ xxxx
Trip Generation, 8th Edition 1799 Institute of Transportation Engineers
. , �( ,{ ,
FlighmTurnover (Sit-Down) Restauranf
(932)
Average Vehicle Trip Ends vs: 1000 Sq. Feet Gross Floor Area
On a: Weekday,
Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic,
One Hour Between 4 and 6 p.m.
Number of Studies: 46
Average 1000 Sq. Feet GFA: 6
Directional Distribution: 59% entering, 41 % exiting
Trip Generation per 1000 Sq. Feet Gross Floor Area
Average Rate Range of Rates
11.15 2.80 - 62.00
Data Plot and Equation
�
�
�
W
a
F�
N
U
�
�
>
a�
�
�
a�
>
a
u
I--
220
210
200
190
180
170
160
150
140
130
120
110
ioo
so
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
Standard Deviation
9.13
; X , �-
- - 1
- - ,i
, X - -
X X ;
� - X - �
X
� - : . . � � - �� � X �� �� �
X
X X
� � � x' � � ` X �
x:
� � � � � ��3�-� � � � � � �
X
X X � �X - k X
� .
�
X X
' '� X
X X,� � � , �
X :-__�< - XX
x X
X, `
. X
>E � X � x' `
.X X
�T , ,
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
X Actual Data Points
Fitted Curve Equation: Not given
j Trip Generation, 8th Edition
X= 1000 Sq. Feet Gross Floor Area
1797
------ Average Rate
Rz _ *�**
Institute of Transportation Engineers
- . ,{ , .
Land Use: 933
Fast-Food Restaurant without
Drive-Through Window
Independent Variab/es with One Observation
The following trip generation data are for independent variables with only one observation. This
information is shown in this table only; there are no related plots for these data.
Users are cautioned to use data with care because of the small sample size.
Trip Size of Number
Generation Independent of
Independent Variable Rate Variable Studies Directional Distribution
1,000 S uare Feet Gross Floor Area
Weekda 716 1 1 50% enterin , 50% exitinc
Saturday 696 1 1 50% enterin , 50% exitinc
Saturday Peak Hour of 54.55 5 1 49% entering, 51 % exitinc
Generator
Sunda 500 1 1 50% enterin , 50% exitin
Seats
Weekda 42.12 17 1 50% enterin , 50% exitin
Weekday p.m. Peak 2.13 30 1 64% entering, 36% exiting
Hour of Adjacent Street
Traffic
Weekday p.m. Peak 6.59 17 1 52% entering, 48% exiting
Hour of Generator
Saturday 40.94 17 1 50% enterin , 50% exitin
Sunda 29.41 17 1 50% enterinq, 50% exitina
Trip Generation, 8th Edition
1815 Institute of Transportation Engineers
., ,�: ,,,
�ast-Food F�estaurant withaut Drive-Through Window
(933)
Average Vehicle Trip Ends vs: 1000 Sq. Feet Gross Floor Area
On a: Weekday,
P.M. Peak Hour of Generator
Number of Studies: 5 �� � ���
Average 1000 Sq. Feet GFA: 3
Directional Distribution: 51 % entering, 49% exiting
Trip Generation per 1000 Sq. Feet Gross Floor Area
Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation
�' 52.40 29.05 - 112.00 19.86
Data Plot and Equation Caution - Use Carefully - Small Sample Size
�
�
c
W
�
F-
�
U
L
�
>
N
�
N
�
>
Q
I I
H
zso
240
230
220
210
200
190
180
170
160
150
140
130
120
110
100
90
80
70
60
50
�
- - - -- -- � - - - - �- - -- - -- - --- ------f'�- -- -
-- -- - -- - - �� - ---- --
- - -- -- >�---- -
- ' - - - - - - - -:= -
- -- - -- -'- - - - '�/ --' --- --- - -
- - - - - - - - - X - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - -�� - - .- - - -
- - ,'
`
- �� - - -- - -- -
-- -�'� -- -- - -- - - -
-- --X - � -
% Actual Data Points
2 3
X= 1000 Sq. Feet Gross Floor Area
Fotted Curve
Fitted Curve Equation: T= 42.68(X) + 27.79
Trip Generation, 8th Edition 1819
4 5
-----� AverageRate
RZ - 0.72
Institute of Transportation Engineers
• . 1 i F •
..._.: �.. ......�.��:. �C �::".:aL:� �..
�ast-�ooc! Restaurant withoui Drive-ihrough V�/indow
(933)
Average Vehicle Trip Ends vs: 1000 Sq. Feet Gross Floor Area
On a: Weekday,
Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic,
One Hour Between 4 and 6 p.m.
Number of Studies: 4
Average 1000 Sq. Feet GFA: 4
Directional Distribution: 51 % entering, 49% exiting
Trip Generation per 1000 Sq. Feet Gross Floor Area
Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation
26.15 14.28 - 36.36 10.51
Data Plot and Equation
�
a
c
W
Q
H
�
U
L
N
�
N
�
ro
a�
>
Q
n
�
130
120
7io
100
90
so
�o
so
Caution - Use Carefully - Small Sample Size
X
- X
,��
x.
3.0 3.1 3.2 3.3 3.4 3.5 3.6 3.7 3.8 3.9 4.0 4.1 42 4.3 4.4 4.5 4.6 4.7
X= 1000 Sq. Feet Gross Floor Area
%< Actual Data Points
Fitted Curve Equation: Not given
------ Average Rate
R2 _ ****
Trip Generation, 8th Edition 1817 Institute of Transportation Engineers
l,
4
,:
�, .,��
����
�',
�i
�.>
Specialty Retaol �eni�r
(81 �)
Average Vehicle Trip Ends vs: 1000 Sq. Feet Gross Leasable Area
On a: Weekday
Number of Studies: 4
Average 1000 Sq. Feet GLA: 25
Directional Distribution: 50% entering, 50% exiting
Trip Generation per 1000 Sq. Feet Gross Leasable Area
Average Rate Range of Rates
44.32 21.30 - 64.21
Data Plot and Equation
�
�
c
W
Q
�
�
U
�
a�
>
�
�
c�
N
>
Q
I
F--
2,100
2,000
1,900
1,800
1,700
1,600
1,500
1,400
1, 300
1,200
1,100
1, 000
900
800
700
600
500
400
10
Standard Deviation
15.52
Caution - Use Carefully - Small Sample Size
X
- - - �
;�- -
- -�� -- - - -
-
-- - -� -- -- - ..
------�--------�---�--------------------�----------�-�-------�-------------------
X
X
X
20 30
X= 1000 Sq. Feet Gross Leasable Area
X Actual Data Points Pitted Curve
Fitted Curve Equation: T= 42.78(X) + 37.66
Trip Generation, 8th Edition
1387
40
------ Average Rate
R2 = 0.69
50
Institute of Transportation Engineers
� , .
Specialty Retail Center
(814)
Average Vehicle Trip Ends vs: 1000 Sq. Feet Gross Leasable Area
On a: Weekday,
P.M. Peak Hour of Generator
Number of Studies: 3 �� N�, �
Average 1000 Sq. Feet GLA: 75
Directional Distribution: 56% entering, 44% exiting
Trip Generation per 1000 Sq. Feet Gross Leasable Area
Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation
5.02 4.59 - 6.18 2.31
Data Plot and Equation Caufion - Use Carefully - Small Sample Size
soo
�oo
600
�
�
c
w
p_ 500
H
N
U
L
� 400
�
�
cu
�
Q 300
I I
F—
200
100
0
10
j- x
X .
- !� � �
X,- - . - - -.
20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150
X= 1000 Sq. Feet Gross Leasable Area
X Actual Data Points
Fitted Curve Equation: Not given
'----- Average Rate
R2 _ �,r+�
Trip Generation, Sth Edition 1390 Institute of Transportation Engineers
a � .
3
Specialty Retail Center
(814)
Average Vehicle Trip Ends vs: 1000 Sq. Feet Gross Leasable Area
On a: Weekday,
Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic,
One Hour Between 4 and 6 p.m.
Number of Studies: 5
Average 1000 Sq. Feet GLA: 69
Directional Distribution: 44% entering, 56% exiting
Trip Generation per 1000 Sq. Feet Gross Leasable Area
Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation
2.71 2.03 - 5.16 1.83
Data Plot and �quation Cauiion - Use Carefully - Small Sample Size
600
500
�
� 400
W
�
�
N
U
L
� 300
a�
�
ro
�
>
Q
�� 200
H
100
0
0 100 200 300
X= 1000 Sq. Feet Gross Leasable Area
%< Actual �ata Points Fitted Curve ------ Average Rate
Fitted Curve Equation: T= 2.40(X) + 21.48 RZ = 0.98
Trip Generation, 8th Edition 1388 Institute of Transportation Engineers
�
Two-Way Stop Control Page 1 of 1
. �, ,
TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY
General Information Site Information
nal st RP Intersection CAUSEWAY/EAST
enc /Co. GCC SHORE
Jurisdiction CLEARWATER
Date Performed 7/15/2011 nal sis Year FUTURE CONDITIONS
nal sis Time Period MIDDAY PEAK
Pro'ect Descri tion
East/West Street: CAUSEWAY BLVD North/South Street: EAST SHORE RT ONLY
Intersection Orientation: East-West Stud Period hrs : 0.25
ehicle Volumes and Ad'ustments
Ma'or Street Eastbound Westbound
Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6
L T R L T R
olume veh/h 950 835 122
Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.97 0.97
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 979 0 0 860 125
veh/h
Percent Heav Vehicles 0 -- -- Q -- --
Median Type Raised curb
RT Channelized 0 0
Lanes 0 2 0 0 2 0
Confi uration T T TR
U stream Si nal 0 0
Minor Street Northbound Southbound
Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12
L T R L T R
olume veh/h 24
Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 0 0 0 0 24
veh/h
Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 2
Percent Grade (%) 0 �
Flared Approach N N
Storage 0 0
RT Channelized 0 0
Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 1
Confi uration R
Dela , Queue Len th, and Level of Service
pproach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12
Lane Configuration R
v (veh/h) 24
C (m) (veh/h) 575
v/c 0. 04
95% queue length 0.13
Control Delay (s/veh) 11.5
LOS B
pproach Delay (s/veh) -- -- 11.5
pproach LOS -- -- B
Copyright O 2010 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.6 Generated: 7/15/2011 7:15 AM
file://C:\Documents and Settings�rpergolizzi.GULFCOAST\Local Settings\Temp\u2k5C.tmp 7/15/2011
�'wo-Way Stop Control Page 1 of 1
,, .
TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY
General Information Site Information
nal st RP Intersection CAUSEWAY/EAST
enc /Co. GCC SHORE
Jurisdiction CLEARWATER
Date Performed nal sis Year FUTURE CONDIT/ONS
nal sis Time Period PM PEAK
Pro'ect Descri tion
East/West Street: CAUSEWAY BLVD North/South Street: EAST SHORE RT ONLY
Intersection Orientation: East-West Stud Period hrs : 0.25
ehicle Volumes and Ad'ustments
Ma'or Street Eastbound Westbound
Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6
L T R L T R
olume veh/h 1174 809 135
Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 1235 0 0 851 142
veh/h
Percent Heav Vehicles 0 -- -- 0 -- --
Median Type Raised curb
RT Channelized 0 0
Lanes 0 2 0 0 2 0
Confi uration T T TR
U stream Si nal 0 0
Minor Street Northbound Southbound
Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12
L T R L T R
olume veh/h 43
Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 0 0 0 0 45
veh/h
Percent Heav Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 2
Percent Grade (%) 0 �
Flared Approach N N
Storage 0 0
RT Channelized 0 0
Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 1
Configuration R
Dela , Queue Len th, and Level of Service
pproach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12
Lane Configuration R
v (veh/h) 45
C (m) (veh/h) 572
v/c 0. 08
95% queue length 0.26
Control Delay (s/veh) 11.8
LOS B
pproach Delay (s/veh) -- -- 11.8
pproach LOS -- -- B
Copyright O 2010 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.6 Generated: 7/15/2011 7:17 AM
file://C:\Documents and Settings�rpergolizzi.GULFCOAST\Local Settings\Temp\u2k60.tmp 7/15/2011
Detailed Report Page 1 of 1
,
HCS+'" DETAILED REPORT
Genera/ lnformation Site Information
Analyst RP Intersection MANDALAY/BAYMONT
Agency or Co. GCC Area Type A/l other areas
Date Performed 7/15/2011 Jurisdiction CLEARWATER
Time Period M/DDAY PEAK Analysis Year FUTURE CONDITIONS
Project ID
Volume and Timin ln ut
EB WB NB SB
LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT
Number of Lanes, N� 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 2 0
Lane Group LTR LTR LTR LTR
Volume, V(vph) 7 8 44 20 5 124 49 362 14 38 374 13
% Heavy Vehicles, %HV 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94
Pretimed (P) or Actuated (A) A A A A A A A A A A A A
Start-up Lost Time, I� 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0
Extension of Effective Green, e 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0
Arrival Type, AT 3 3 3 3
Unit Extension, UE 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0
Filtering/Meterin , I 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000
Initial Unmet Demand, Qb 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Ped / Bike / RTOR Volumes 94 0 15 61 0 11 80 0 0 51 0 0
Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0
Parking / Grade / Parking N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N
Parking Maneuvers, Nm
Buses Stopping, Na 0 0 0 0
Min. Time for Pedestrians, GP 3.6 3.5 3.6 3.4
Phasing EW Perm 02 03 04 NS Perm 06 07 08
G= 14.0 G= G= G= G= 38.0 G= G= G=
Timing Y= 4 Y= Y= Y= Y= 4 Y= Y= Y=
Duration of Analysis, T= 0.25 Cycle Length, C= 60.0
Lane Grou Ca aci , Control De/a , and LOS Determination
EB WB NB SB
LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT
Adjusted Flow Rate, v 47 146 452 452
Lane Group Capacity, c 380 371 1951 2004
v/c Ratio, X 0.12 0.39 0.23 0.23
Total Green Ratio, g/C 0.23 0.23 0.63 0.63
Uniform Delay, d� 18.2 19.4 4.7 4.7
Progression Factor, PF 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000
Delay Calibration, k 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11
Incremental Delay, dz 0.1 0.7 0.1 0.1
Initial Queue Delay, d3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Control Delay 18.3 20.1 4.8 4.8
Lane Group LOS 8 C A A
Approach Delay 18.3 20.1 4.8 4.8
Approach LOS B C A A
Intersection Delay 7,4 X� = 0.28 Intersection LOS A
Copyright �O 2007 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.3 Generated: 7115/2011 7:18 AM
file://C:\Documents and Settings�rpergolizzi.GULFCOAST\Local Settings\Temp\s2k72.tmp 7/15/2011
Detailed Report Page 1 of 1
,. .
HCS+'" DETAILED REPORT
General Information Site Information
Analyst RP Intersection MANDALAY/BAYMONT
Agency or Co. GCC Area Type All other areas
Date Performed 7/15/2011 Jurisdiction CLEARWATER
Time Period PM PEAK Analysis Year FUTURE CONDITIONS
Project ID
Volume and Timin ln ut
EB WB NB SB
LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT
Number of Lanes, N� 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 2 0
Lane Group LTR LTR LTR LTR
Volume, V(vph) 12 3 51 31 12 112 44 353 14 44 462 16
% Heavy Vehicles, %HV 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91
Pretimed (P) or Actuated (A) A A A A A A A A A A A A
Start-up Lost Time, li 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0
Extension of Effective Green, e 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0
Arrival Type, AT 3 3 3 3
Unit Extension, UE 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0
Filterin /Metering, I 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000
Initial Unmet Demand, Qb 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Ped / Bike / RTOR Volumes 172 0 15 54 0 11 112 0 0 33 0 0
Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0
Parking / Grade / Parking N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N
Parking Maneuvers, Nm
Buses Stopping, Ns 0 0 0 0
Min. Time for Pedestrians, GP 4.0 3.4 3.7 3.3
Phasing EW Perm 02 03 04 NS Perm 06 07 08
G= 14.0 G= G= G= G= 38.0 G= G= G=
Timing Y= 4 Y= Y= Y= Y= 4 Y= Y= Y=
Duration of Analysis, T= 0.25 Cycle Length, C= 60.0
Lane Grou Ca aci , Control Dela , and LOS Determination
Eg Wg NB SB
LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT
Adjusted Flow Rate, v 56 158 451 574
Lane Group Capacity, c 364 367 1935 1998
v/c Ratio, X 0.15 0.43 0.23 0.29
Total Green Ratio, g/C 0.23 0.23 0.63 0.63
Uniform Delay, d� 18.3 19.6 4.7 4.9
Progression Factor, PF 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000
Delay Calibration, k 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11
Incremental Delay, d2 0.2 0.8 0.1 0.1
Initial Queue Delay, d3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Control Delay 18.5 20.4 4.8 5.0
Lane Group LOS 8 C A A
Approach Delay 18.5 20.4 4.8 5.0
Approach LOS B C A A
Intersection Delay 7,5 X� = 0.33 Intersection LOS A
Copyright O 2007 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.3 Generated: 7/15/2011 7:19 AM
file:l/C:\Documents and Settings�rpergolizzi.GULFCOAST\Local Settings\Temp\s2k84.tmp 7/15/2011
Detailed Report Page 1 of 1
�. .
HCS+�' DETAILED REPORT
General Information Site Information
Analyst RP Intersection CORONADO/GULFVIEW
Agency or Co. GCC Area Type A/l other areas
Date PerFormed 7/15/2011 Jurisdiction CLEARWATER
Time Period M/DDAY PEAK Analysis Year FUTURE CONDITIONS
Project ID
Volume and Timin In ui
EB WB NB SB
LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT
Number of Lanes, N� 2 0 0 2 2 2
Lane Group L LR LT T R
Volume, V(vph) 256 27 1 479 329 362
% Heavy Vehicles, %HV 2 2 2 2 2 2
Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97
Pretimed (P) or Actuated (A) A A A A A A
Start-up Lost Time, I� 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0
Extension of Effective Green, e 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0
Arrival Type, AT 3 3 3 3 3
Unit Extension, UE 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0
Filterin /Metering, I 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000
Initial Unmet Demand, Qb 0.0 0.0 0.0 D.D 0.0
Ped / Bike / RTOR Volumes 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 45 0 0
Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0
Parking / Grade / Parking N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N
Parking Maneuvers, Nm
Buses Stopping, Na 0 0 0 0 0
Min. Time for Pedestrians, GP 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.4
Phasing EB Only 02 03 04 NS Perm 06 07 08
G= 22.0 G= G= • G= G= 30.0 G= G= G=
Timing Y= 4 Y= Y= Y= Y= 4 Y= Y= Y=
Duration of Analysis, T= 0.25 Cycle Length, C= 60.0
Lane Grou Ca aci , Contro/ Dela , and LOS Defermination
EB WB NB SB
LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT
Adjusted Flow Rate, v 264 2g 495 339 373
Lane Group Capacity, c 1260 580 1693 1774 1402
v/c Ratio, X 0.21 0.05 0.29 0.19 0.27
Total Green Ratio, g/C 0.37 0.37 0.50 0.50 0.50
Uniform Delay, d� 13.0 12.3 8.8 8.3 8.7
Progression Factor, PF 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000
Delay Calibration, k 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11
Incremental Delay, d2 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1
Initial Queue Delay, d3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Control Delay 13.1 12.3 8.9 8.3 8.8
Lane Group LOS 8 8 A A A
Approach Delay 13.0 8.9 8.6
Approach LOS e A A
Intersection Delay 9,5 X� = 0.26 Intersection LOS A
Copyright O 2007 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.3 Generated: 7I1512011 7:20 AM
file://C:\Documents and Settings�rpergolizzi.GULFCOAST�Local Settings\Temp\s2k96.tmp 7/15/2011
Detailed Report Page 1 of 1
.. ,�,, . ..
HCS+�' DETAILED REPORT
Genera/ Information Site Information
Analyst RP Intersection CORONADO / GULFVIEW
Agency or Co. GCC Area Type A/l other areas
Date Performed 7/15/2011 Jurisdiction CLEARWATER
Time Period PM PEAK Analysis Year FUTURE CONDITIONS
Project ID
Volume and Timin In ut
EB WB NB SB
LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT
Number of Lanes, N� 2 0 0 2 2 2
Lane Group L LR LT T R
Volume, V(vph) 296 10 0 601 382 287
% Heavy Vehicles, %HV 2 2 2 2 2 2
Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93
Pretimed (P) or Actuated (A) A A A A A A
Start-up Lost Time, I� 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0
Extension of Effective Green, e 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0
Arrival Type, AT 3 3 3 3 3
Unit Extension, UE 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0
Filtering/Metering, I 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000
Initial Unmet Demand, Qb 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Ped / Bike / RTOR Volumes 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 45 0 0
Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0
Parking / Grade / Parking N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N
Parking Maneuvers, Nm
Buses Stopping, Na 0 0 0 0 0
Min. Time for Pedestrians, Gp 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.4
Phasing EB Only 02 03 04 NS Perm 06 07 08
G= 22.0 G= G= G= G= 30.0 G= G= G=
Timing Y= 4 Y= Y= Y= Y= 4 Y= Y= Y=
Duration of Analysis, T= 0.25 Cycle Length, C= 60.0
Lane Grou Ca aci , Control Dela , and LOS Determination
EB WB NB SB
LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT
Adjusted Flow Rate, v 318 11 646 411 309
Lane Group Capacity, c 1260 580 1774 1774 1402
v/c Ratio, X 0.25 0.02 0.36 0.23 0.22
Total Green Ratio, g/C 0.37 0.37 0.50 0.50 0.50
Uniform Delay, d� 13.3 12.1 9.2 8.5 8.4
Progression Factor, PF 1.000 9.000 1.000 1.000 1.000
Delay Calibration, k 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11
Incremental Delay, d2 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1
Initial Queue Delay, d3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Control Delay 13.4 12.1 9.3 8.5 8.5
Lane Group LOS 8 8 A A A
Approach Delay 13.3 9.3 8.5
Approach LOS 8 A A
Intersection Delay g.g X� = 0.32 Intersection LOS A
Copyright O 2007 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS+rM Version 5.3 Generated: 7115/2011 7:20 AM
file://C:\Documents and Settings�rpergolizzi.GULFCOAST\Local Settings\Temp\s2kA8.tmp 7/15/2011
J
r
��.�,�«�..����..$.
< ,�. .,,:.
;
I y
'� ?� _____
�,
, ----
��� � � ---=; _
_
0
_ - o 0 l0
—�--- i I�
�_�\ I � m
:�,/ � y a
- � c
_ �
�
ti a
a
`--- � F
O
Z
I
m
O
�
',, I. . __ O �N
�___ __ -�.
- i�
��� �
�
� � o
� ___-
� _ _ ___ _ ____ ___ . _ _ ____ _ �_ _
- � ___, , �
_ ��
. __� �
�_ _�________ _ , �� .
___i
-_, ;
_ ___
_ __
, __ _ ,� __ � , :,, .._x. ,�,
�
�
�� ,
�— ——__ '=3=-- -- -—\�\ � I
---- --- t
�
I�
�C 2011 J.W.SMITH DESIGN GROUP,LL.C. � DO NOT SCALE PRINTS
ARETAILBUILDOUT t ��`"�"°':"�° PN°�"'o °> `o�
O ..� y ' m� �� CrQu' ��Q��Pn�QQi�rQ 0 Z . Z
z Z m � = J.KOKOLAKIS CONTRACTING � 11� ■V ��������+��+����� � y g =
�o� �, � � 3asnnnNOnu+vnvE. AaCHITECTURE / PLANNING �mm��9�==���"'���� D �
�T Z � CLEARWATER BEACH,FL �Q o R y���m N� � o
C)O y � w 748 BROADWAV SUfiE 202 - N� ,�,y� V Ig �
��� 1 a DUNEDIN,FLORIDA34698 o��p�gx x�� ggggg�o D o 0
� � PROPOSED iST FLOOR PLAN PH.727J85.4441 FAX 727J24.4149 - �$°',d M'Y n m ��p:_. y m m
Z � AA26001913 ___"_'�_>> _____ m cu n�
�.��.�,.,�.
s�
,. _ �
, � _ -- -,
I �O °
�� ---- -- '
', I - — ---
', � ---
�I --- _
� � � �
�� m nt � `� � �
'�� �= �
b
�� �.. � A � �:� � ..
�
�i � ' . . ...... ....
Z .
w'�, �,. . K : 4 . .
�
� �� ,_ 2
t Ip =
m p
� 'a
s
N
O O
��. ��. � _ ��I: .
m
. , :_._ z .. ... . .. . .
�
'. . � ,, . ��.
. . (i� ; � . . . �'
m
' y X ��fE
�
C�2017OJ.W.SMRH DESIGN GR�,L.L.=. � ����� �s P U,V DO NOT£G1LE PRINTz
ARETAILBUILDOUT ' �u�°""°°""=` ���5 °
� s m
5qR CR� R �€�RA A
zZm m J.KOKOLAKISCONTRACTING E���������������� y m
�a3 m � i sasMnNOnv,vAVE. ARCHITECTURE / PLANHING ��T�����_����"��g� 9
�TZ � ; CLEARWATERBEACH,FL „i���e�Nmm�m yN D
n O D � m 748 BROADWAV SUITE 202 �N$ ���y � g c°u
�D 31 _1_ a DUNEDIN,FLORIDA 34698 0�g��� a g� p g8 g g o D o 0
� j �v PROPOSED 2ND FLOOR PLAN PH.727J85.4447 FAX.72772a.a149 r a°f��R`�"x�e m '�'�q:�. m � m
Z AA2600t913 "____"'-_- -_-__ � N
• N JOBNUMBER�.
� 2 70162
¢
d Da7E:
Q 04/26/11
N
ORAWN BV:
o Author
z NO. DESCRIPTION DATE�.
0
WEPSTERS
t0 pE51CNGWW'ES OS.�Btt
DE&CNNEFINEMEMS Oit9.l1
13 OESIGNflEFINEAIENTS 051�.11
OESMiiHEFWEMENTS O.U5.11
t5 91TEFEFMBAEMS OSdO_It
is oESiwrnvnau osoi�i
UYpRSAODFD
_�-� i8 MISEOIK.LUPaIN. a6t6t�
-- � fB DESIW FEFNIEMENTS 062t.t1
20 pE51(WPEFIe�EMENiS�).Oi.ii
r .. zi urareenEw m.as.n
- oacco.wcxrs oeia�
______ az �
.,,_.. ............... ._..... �� -
', _ LEV.
' I ' DRY S flAGE '
U EX
,
MECHANICAL
q [j c�
�1 ��__ �
' O BAR EER C(1U .T� z m�
p • � t��
�, �^ 6 �¢n
\ V/0 m
� 'a°�o
� TT W 3LLf�
c��' ,Ha�E �./ � '— p o?Q I
i i
i
i � V
W N
� W mZ�
' L_ _.__.__. .. ... f" mQf� .
._ ....._______�. _______ ______________
�, .__-� '�' d ^
u =
� ` a
' �
- Z
F
Q
FIOOTERS Z z
O " a
_
j o � Qw o
o y �m LL
s � 5w w
, m O oa >
��_� � W p �¢ o
� _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ' � �
0
a "� m U ¢
U SHEETNUMBER
�
.
. - ¢ PRE-3
� �1 _ __ __ _ _ _ __ �
� ,-a�=; t,� z
�__ �
N SEAL
W
� O
C
� N PRELIMINARY-
� N NOTFOR
CONSTRUCTION
O
W JOBNUMBER�.
. z 10162
. Q
� DATE:
FINISH M3_� � FINISH k2,-����, � Q O4/ZS/1�
__ - - _ _.. ,. ._ . T -- �_� .. __— . . _ u F ` .._;. VUl
, ..... ......... ._ _�... .... ..r
I �t ..'FINISHp3'.. .. ORAWNBV�. JAB3
_' .�.. '1 , F-
. - __ _ _ � - --_. .. .-. _ ._.. _ _ .__.. _ �� r r �, '...• � p NO. DESCRIPTION Or1TE�.
'� - __.-_-� __' � .___ � O < �
_
_
if - ....'"'�F I 6 �E910NCHC11GE5 OIZ1.11
� - FINISHMI a2���
�RNI6H kP'� . Y.•. . �_ _ IL .__�: � -� ... '� 6 RFLmArE
-' I / I FINISHM2 I WMPS*Ens
FINISH%3';- I li oE51GrvG�u+GES mie,�1
. �
., . �. .��. / � 10
FINISH%2'•- t �,�.'�. ��:,� .� . t� o[SIfwFEFINFAlEHi5o5.�i.t�
� . ,. " '. �I� ...:..�"��� � .FINISHN2_� .. �, t� �FSNWPEFINEMENiS 05311�
� I
T— �^ ��. . .-... �._.. ��.�.�_� , - - --_ -w-� �FINISHm . "1�RV . �,, u oESict+PEfwEUENiS ttzs.ii
�� "' : IS 91tE11FfYlLEM6 053011
_...... _- FINISHp3'',, Z""" -. . .... . . �b oF51GN�PPFWU a6.Otii
,FINISHX4:- . ' �..; ..._ ... � .. . , i » uVWiS�mED acastt
. .,..... Ib 0.USEOlif tOP<IN OS�S�t
' „ I I .. f *� :,�FINISH#2 � 'i 19 OESM�IPEFINEMENi50fi1]11
{j{j{j p OESWNFEFINEMENiS O�D1.11
- }}}
�:, I I {I ]3 OFGG�MMfENiS Oii1.11
IFINISHM2,'.— - � I � I I '�� �� J I
1�I . � � �. I � I ll ', I
, .~* ��.. II ..FINISH� �, ,
� 1 � �
. �. _�L y _ �FINISHt3] i
.. -'� _'. � '_-
_ — ._ � . .., _ _ , -' -.. i i — _ ,k ar .
� [ .,y _ .. .... . � -_.�
I �
r-� ° , � � � �- , ' ��
� � ^.�� `i � �I ' r � � � �
FINISH F2
. . .. .�. .... �. � r �
_ - ..�_ _ .. — � -TR} -'{ �.� I� -,_T — - \ .
��
I i FIN18H M3]
�
Y I I � �� I �� .
' � 'I I� � III! I''�. ... F�N�sH zz]
If . . . _ __ Rrqp[N �'�,-
I! �
� � ,�._ . � �. i
�� / ' � � FINISHA2 � p
FINISH p1 I �����' �--[FINISH M3�. � � �
fFINISHN2:---� ��-� ` �FINISHk1: �� FINISHNI._I
� � FINISH LEGEND �
FINISHyI ALUMINUM-CLEARANNODIZEDFlNISH �..Z d
FINISN y2 BENJAMIN MOORE-NAVAJO W HRE-907 - a
FINISHi3 BENJAMINMOORE-STONEBNOWN-2112-30 v
FINISHM4 BEWMMNMOORE-JETBIACK-2120-10 �
• � ��ri
>an
MATERIALS: � `�-�°Q o
wni.i.,- >ruceo a o LL
RAILINGS- WROUGHT A�UMINUA�t 3o LL_�
UOOHS AND WWDOWS- IMPA�i GLA�S W�ANNOLAZEU �� u c?�¢
AWMINU�dFRAPAES Q°w �
A4VNINGS- ALUMMUM OR STEEL "'' aD
i, mzn
� � �°�
�...- — n n
x
;_FWISHM3} .. FINISHp2_�'�. u S
� a
._—_ .`., — � — —... . ._— -- — wr_sr.ru�- L'�,.... . .�. �� <
—_ ._ .__— ._ _ _ ._. _ —_. — a�r � � ,
. �.., ,-� +�-� �_FINISH#2 I . I
_._._._. �',., � .. .—�� .._. Lc— _ __ .....— _. _. _.._... __ �at5_%aFn���.�: �. C7
... _. ' ��z ,� �
FINISHp3 F �� ' II Z
i {IjI F
i juj� �— �_ j Q
�FINISHR3� . ... .. .. I.�_Jl.. I � I I ... .._. . �.. Q
........ � ` . . . �
I .. FINISH k3 i�
_ � O �
-- .... .___ i
— --- -- � n-v . r Uwv
� - ...__ ._ ._.... _ i _ .._i :rl � � �Q
�FINISHIt2� .-.. .. .. -.. � +�FINISHpt 'Y � - Q m
.. _ . ._ . —_T- .. ._T_.. ...._._ �3 ° Y >
� ,` I� �-��_� . _ -
I �k �� i ' ! � � 5 w Z
�FiNisH xz t- - �-' �� ro O o a o
i �I I � f ¢ � a� <
I.FINISMl13_f . ...r ^ .'... Q Y �w W
__ - — �ur \... �.. Q '� `�U W
T � � I SHEETNUMBER
�FlN�sH et�. _.►i ' ... ..., � ...-� � , _... I ::I __. I__: —T-_-- -j FINISH Nl i J
FINISH k2 " { I f-�1 1� ' � I I a
"�� PRE-4
-� �- —r--� - �. - r-�- - - _ � —�, -a o
�
� , �
� , , , � � �; �
� + , . ; 4 - �� �
� . � ' is� '� . w 3EAL
--. _. . — ._ _a .. � o
H
f
� 3 PRELIMINAFY-
� NOT FOR
� N CONSTRUCTION
U
� JOBNUMBEF:
• 2 10162
� � FINISHC2 a DATE'
_-..
_ . .._. __ . ' �,_.
_ _- -. .. __ _ _ _ - _ ' .__.__ - _ - _ . -_ _. �t��ru,-� � OS/19l11
� _.. __ . a s � ..i a
I I N DRAWNBV'.
- '...:.�' .
. _ _ _ _ - ..."___ _ _ . ._ _ _ _' �. _ __ ...._ - _ _. ___..._ ._ ._-..- - �_'{..- __- - _-___. . �� a�iiz ...t I Q AUIhOf
I '', Z NO. DESCRIVTION OATE:
�FINISH p2� . . � ,.�: .. �...I �', 0 i ��.
FINISfI k9, '�� ...��
.. , i. , �! DE9M>4PEFINEMENTS S.i1
.. I .. i,. '.�.. ,, S 9iElifMflAEMS OS.JOi1
�.
1
� . II , � t6 OESIf.NMPRWFL 46011t
_ ..._. . ..___ ..._-. ... '.. ! i) WYqR5PO0ED d6.Ofi.li
-i- .. ___.. . ...... .. ........ :' i IB IWSEDRF.tOP�IN. 06.�G1i
i
I IB oESICNNEFlNEMEMS�fi1Jt�
____ _ ...:_T . -�-- �iau� I w oESMnn�ir�cucxrs o o.ii
-. - . - -__: __ _. -._._.,r:. . _.__.. _
�, n�o' , a� oacawneHrs oziau
;. _
_ " - m
�FINI9H N2'r y%.�� � -......1 FlNISM M2.� I
: ;�--{FINISITY2.; . ��,
�FINISH#3.!.. .. � � I
�
�__,,. ___»._.: y.����,�. �
_ _ -_ .
. _-_. - _-___ _. __— - -__ _ -! _ - ia�r'�.� �'I
_-. - ` .__ _ .
_. - .'„ �'.� � .___. __.... ._._. ��J.�� 'I
,,.,,:�_._ _ I . . I
i FlNISH%3.: ._.._ � ., ' � .
� I
_� +t-:.�� ....... ...
_T - -_ __ - —��`' -_ ...-.. _ _.�..._ - �. ...?
�
-:� ,y V ���,�n_�__
H.C.SPACE" !
� {--� - . `—o_s .�1 . .
i
' ��FiNisH+ra'i FINISH LEGEND
�������-��-----� FINISHM/ ALUMINUM-CLEARANNODIZEDFINISH
FINISITY2 BENJAMINMOORE-NAVAJOWHfTE�967 � V. a
FINISNI3 BENJAMINMOORE-STONEBROWN-2112-30 ..Z w
FINISHN4 BENJAMINMOORE-JETBLACK-2120-10 - �
� = N��
MATERIALS: • � � ���
WALLS- STOCCO ° N o^�,�
RAILINGS- WROUGHTA_UMINUM .\ Q
UOOHS ANG WINCCWS- IAIPACI"u�ASS Wi ANNODIZEi Q�"
ALUMINUM FHAMES W 3 LL��
AWNINGS- Ai.UMINUM GR STEEL ����°.. °a?�
V ¢W m
- i FlNISM,f2��, _„����. "' mm Z I�
/ �"' x
.— .._. — �_ __ — . X3F5"c,�qVEi��`,_. . u
^0 N
r
.__ __ —..... — --....
._ _ _._. — _ ____. _ _— . ... _ . ... —. f S
FINI9HN3��. °�s � � a
I FINISITY2 .� �I � � i � I, � <
_.__ � . ..__. .. .... _ _ ���D��.ii�M1r� �, •�_...{ ':
... ._ _. . __-. .. .___. -_� a� 2 -��
. ...._.__. __ .__._ _. -__. _. _.-_. I
I FINISITY2 .�.-....-..►� -- �.� �
FMlI5HY2_}-.... � . � .- I,FINISM#3���., �'. F
:I I I
I U
FINISH N3��._ . . .. ' _.__ ____ .....`� ____- k '',, Q
I � I
� �
_-__ _- _. ._ -.. _.-- ._ - _..._ - __-_. _ _.. __ .. ..._ . ._. _ ____..
�tarepp � Z
i � O LL
S
FMIISHI3.}_.. ���� ::�� ,,y I j � Q W
,FiN�sn Ma - ......_. .. ,. Q Y m
,FlNISITYI}- .___... --�,FINISMi2_� ! � J g W N
Z
r
- �fFlNISHp3I I O
I � �'� J O �Q O
�, �` _— � � �I �
--- --- - - - — — - .._— - - _. __ ir r I Y w w
___'___ ___"' ' ___' _" ___ _ ___ "�_ .
��FINISH M4 J
�
,wri
tr N J
FINISHM2}-►. a,�i^ � . - ____ "...._ ��. a '� �U w
�
� �� � . ,��� � �� . , J SHEET NUMBER
i
� � .._ _ _-.___ �.-�=- .T�
- -.- �_.�. . _ --:- --`-O ----.•- - . - _ � . }...�.
...��' �-FINISHt2 j
i � � �� . � ' � � xi. _ II a
, �� � PRE-5
..
I� �y _, , . . ; , . ��.. ...._ .'FINISHM3_� ¢
x � �`.�*,,,EB � _i9rROpi r. � Z
'� p�T... ..f U'
� w SEAI
�9 �
H
& 3
PRELIMINARY-
, ^ NOT FOR
# ' CONSTRUCTION
� N
� O
� JOBNUMBER'.
. � � . Z 10162
,; ____....
-__.______ . , _____ . � ¢
___.— - ....
____ __.___.. `
— d DATE:
� . � 04/25/11
_._.. �... ��� ---_
___,. .""'...
. _._ . .� � � U
. �.., -- w N DRAWNBV:
.-__.-.,._ ,... p Au�hof
� � � � Z NO. DESCRIPTION OATE'.
� �
' I s oESNWCJWUifS ws��1
(- . 6 PELOWIE 011I.t1
I - _ � WWSIERS
I
, _ OESNfNGNN0E6 OS.ie�t
_ �_-- t0
� 1... . .. ... ... . . ..... . ... . � tt DESIfi�VPEFINEMENtS a5.i9i�
- pFyGVPFFINFM.ENiS 651a1t
, .•..�..• .. •.... • , . �'c � r� � i5 SIiEfEFEWFAIEMSTS�5.11
.,.�.��. „� .t�:. �,e�*� .....� e, � ��.. f ��- r; 16 OESIGN�IPPFWN 060i�t
�i
� , 4 �k �0 ftV5E011F TWa1N. 06.�&ti
_.�.�'4 _.. � y ..� � m �wnfln�i�Mtr�i s a�a.i
� � , w.o��u
y "" a oa.ccoo�ex.s
t i' �£
I � '-�'
,� ��
,
i � � _ -
, {
� , �� �� �
� '` ,
..._..,�— M -
t - - -- —_. _.
I ... -- �. . .. .__ — --- --...__ _.
__ —.�
— �
k,,;.,.
� I ,:, ., ;.�.�� „ � d, _ .,- ..,, .. - .. , . '� '..
, . < .. ' ' .. .�: � .
i �
.,. '�,�;�� � ia �k i .
�� y;-: . . . __..... � �_� ,_ ,�.
}
�i;�.�1 � I ��t��� � i � �#
�k �'�� I k{ I� I � � �
if` k �
�� .} I�I/I��I .
{
� Z I
�xy: " . -s..�� __,: . .E . -� —�(�""'�... k�`�"��}� I�., _
---�.�.� . ,a.-�.->" . . � . --i � '�
� �
� � z rn
� —1- - - y � F _ e
— - — . � .. - � - .���� o m
z �
_." i� � : - . -, � . _ -__ - _ �--. - - - -- • � ����
„ .. �--_
---
(�� WESTERN EXPOSURE � �oX�
\_� __ _--- m
<�`�
_ _ U� ° �
_
<o�
_ _ �
, ,�,��,���� _ _ _` —� � mjm
� �
---- ....-. — ��
� � �
`T � _
.. ' ..._.. � � a
_ _ �
■
�
I �
Z
->- _ F-
f �' Q
a>' Ex; �
��, � -�.`:� :�'� ' Z ii
` „
� �'4c'
� .� �- ' � _ _ M... ;., � O "'a w
O � �w
p Y a pp >
W
7 J �W
>
� � a � a¢ a
, .:�„ � - - - -- ¢ Y �w a�
�- � � J W
__� __� � - ;,. -, i a -i �U a
�l J SHEETNUMBER
e � I �
� ` � � � � PRE-6 ';
y o
t ; � ¢
� - _1
......���...�a,� �:; _ -- �''
� :
� ;- -;., � .. . , ...;_ -� � _ " � � SEAL
; <��. ,.. ....>�'�.„ . .��:
, � . .. .� ,A '._.. ,. _ ' O
...... � . .. .
� ,
� � .__�.__> >.- .. _
_.—.T.�.��.��.,�� ' "
..— . . . ..... . _ .,. _..., ,:..... . , ....... S
u,...., {. F
�
� �' PRELIMINARY-
� __ _ _ __
3 NOT FOR
�SOUTH WESTERN EXPOSURE ° corvsrRUCriorv
1 �
0
����,��.�,�,, '
�
– i '�,����
��� ��1�
, °, r�..
, i ; !
, -- -- '
_ I
j � ; �1:�
� � � ,
�
_. t �t � � ' , ;
I� , , ?.. , ,-m,.- —_ __ �
��P, _
`
, .,
� � , r� ,
,
�_ �� , �___ �' :
� � --
, � --
a, � � —�
�. ."_'�� I. �...:.:_ n_._7,'�.
� � � I *�
� , � _�._.�._.�_i ? `'� �
– � i
. � — — i
_� _-T_
i
i'� � � � �
r
i — _ ���
� –
. � — _ �_�,_ –
If t � �'r �
� �a i � _ _
/� �� '^ I
V/ :. � J' �: 4 ,� VJ ..�� .
' �
i F v
_ .. � �'. ^`��� .
. � ��
'.O � :': -• � v'. � O .
C C i - ( II
�2 `� a �� II � � �!�'.
m '�� � I; ! 1
!D
�
,��
,
;
, �
c ,':
;
, , ,,
,
'Cn ��; �_` � �Z �' ; _ _� �,
. ` ,
{ X, � i l i �,
m i�
�o '" i :. � — - -
z p
'1 ���_: ��� _� i i
X 1� �_, � K ' !C j lF I I �.
�'� �� �' j� �� .�x.:� 70 :��, ; _ � i
,;,
� H,'' m _
���cn 1� � T , i ''
,
� .
� � _ ` _ ' I;
m 4 F
� _ l�;
� � i
� i I�
,, i i
,� � � �
----- fi
'I; . i �
�
l i
�;.
___-�
/�' z
� �
n^'
c. `' ��
� ` r �� (�
� �.: ��� l: € ,5;
� ,�, ��° � �
E. � �.
��
a ���� � �
�� ����
� QC 2011 J.W.SMITH DESIGN GROUP,LLC. � �' � DO NOT SCALE PRINTS
O A RETAIL BUILDOUT ������ ��'°m°""'"'_° o g °> o`
z Z m � m J.KOKOLAKIS CONTRACTING ����������� m � ;
�o� � � aesMnN�n�nvnvE. ARCHITECTURE / PLANNING �=��b�m"� � ;
n
�T Z T c CLEARWATER BEACH,FL --q q �=4� a
n O D � • ' • m 748 BROADWAV SURE 202 �:?�F����� � < °
A
� � � a DUNEDIN,FLORIDA 34698 y N y N D
� < � °°xR$a �� o � m o
PERSPECTNE VIEWS PH.727.785.aaa1 FAx.72z724.a1a9 ;,-y��m m �y �
AA26001973 =-___'-'__ 'm ° N
�.�,,,�..��.��,.�,..m. '
'G s 1
I�
�
'�
� i
_---_.. --
�� �, -
-------
+ I
j � �I
� a 3 's
I ��,��,�
' �'
� - V �'
� - ,I
i^
,m ,-__
,D �
_
� , '.
, = sr.
m � . _ � _r ,�, �
� i !, ;
z
� f � '
jo ' j ! ;
,� � i
� G
m � ,
�
,
;
� i ,ry � ,�
, �
�', � -..—r°1
1 I,
� I j' i
� y��.
I
�
I
i
I� , _______.___._._— __f:
1
; �
� ��
�
�C 2011 J.W.SMRH DESIGN GROUP,LLC. � '''( ,��� DO NOT$CALE PRINTS
\�
T A RETAIL BUILDOUT \ ��n m�_�_� = g �
� 7] �J m \ ` R 'S A�A� ,R F o D
�z� m J.KOKOLAKIS CONTRACTING �v ���������� m � �
-��— � 385 MANDALAY AVE. � � a n
��� � � ARCHITECTURE / PLANNING ���. ���� �
�T Z � � m C�EARWATEq BEACH,FL ���q����N �y
��D 748 BROADWAV SUITE 202 N £'"y N y �� p
� � � a DUNEDIN,FLORIDA 34698 o S& �S o c m o
Z � � PERSPECTNE VIEWS PH.727785.4441 FAX.727J24.a1a9 �°�P���p m . m o �
AA28001913 """"' � N
����.��,,,.,�..
`� � �
� � �
�� ����
1 �
�;, �..
��;
�`
; ,
, ; �. ,
�. ���,
`, _ i �r � ` �,.
� i�'li "� 1
' � , °��� �
� ;
�
�� ����� 1
� �.
, ,
, �-- �,J' � ����.
�, _J i I , u�:a��, ,
'i i
�' ���
� ---,{; I 'u }w
F� � � , I, ����
�� � � - � ' � �'�
� '
, � , �
�
� , � �,
F �� i � r�� �I�i � (
�:, ,' �
�
h°3„'.
6"
th
�°'
� j� �.
�
;
�:
�` �+ �
��:��, �:
j ��'I �`��
� � ,f�.� �� ��
�� �, � �
- �1� r� - � �� �.
�' �� � �
,�.
r.�,,.,�
I�`,
, �
���t--� �,- ;' ;
. '-f,,---r __-- �
� ,
, � �� ��:
I, � .
� _ � � i � r.
3
� ,.. .. k�`�:
� t
�.
I
`1.
. �, �,e?.j�. .
. , •�E�.. �,
C�2011 J.W.SMRH DESIGN GROUP,L.L.C. � �( ,��� DO NOT SCALE PRINTS
\�
n A RETAIL BUILDOUT ' �; ���'m� o °� °> `om
z z m �T m J.KOKOLAKIS CONTRACTING v ������ � _ ;
�O'- O1i 385 MANDALAY AVE. �^m�'�� n -
�.�� �J z ARCHITECTURE / PUNNING ��mg�
� m c CLEARWATER BEACH,F� R N
�O�� 1 ■ � m 748 BROADWAV SU R E 202 y�„F � �n �
{ � DUNEDIN,FLORIDA 34698 °g B R o S o °
PERSPECTIVE VIEWS PH.727785.4441 FAX.7D72a.a7a9 '°?�v�°�;m o m
Z � AA26001913 ___�>> N
� N JOBNUMBER�
_� TENMR AREA SCNEDULE z �0162
-� -- . . ._._—__.T— ----- �T__- ¢
'� TYPE OF a onTE�
TENANT TYPE OF SPACE LEVEL FAR PARqNG OCCUPANT �' AREA "' 05/19/11
OPEN i. - ' i ELFCTRICAI ELECTRICALRMONE 1STFLOOR VES VES MECHANICAL BOSF U
31SF . ' " HOOTERS aoom ' � oanwNev:
MECHANICAL 8p$F � �pg3
I � 24 STARBUCKS� MAIN SPACE 1ST ROOR YES YES RESiRURANT 1516 SF Z
H TERS �'� � --- --- p NO. DESCRIP710N DATE'.
�_ . HOOTERS LOBBV 1STFLOOR YES VES RESTAURANT 22BSF
_�8 Sr j,l STAR8UGK5 _ PAT10 15T ROOR NO VES REST�URANi 375 SF � � �
,
_ .L�,_=: HOOTERS CORRIDOR ISTFLOOR VES VES RESTRUR/WT 248SF �� �yp�q�qh��y��,y��
I ' � RESiAUflNJT 239BSF
w _-'t. i� OE4CN PEFlHEMEMS 051511
; � RETAILONE MAINSPACE 1STFLOOR YES YES RETAIL �18195F �5 9rEREfINEr�EMS 690.��
- ' RETAIL 18195F �8 oE9av�PPHw/1 o6o�i�
- � ' 'I ,'� :: � HOOTERS BALCONV 2NDFLOOR NO VES RESTAUMNT 1350SF
' �! I � MOOIERS AINNSPFCE � 2NDFLOOR YES VES RESTAURAN� 2058$F �e iwSEDla.iav�ln a6i6+�
__--. ... i9 OE9C�111EFlNEl1FN15 4Et111
—— . M pE9(WPFANBIBlIS 0]-0I.tt
G a HOOTERS LOBBV 2NDFLOOR YES YES RESTAURANT 150SF y p��prErrts o�ilti
OPEN HOOTERS qTCMEN 2N0 ROOR YES YES RESTAURMlf 956 SF
6S SF �T��—� RESTAURAN7 d5135F
. 1819 SF MECHANIChL ELEV.EOUIP. ROOFTOPLEVEL NO NO MECHANCAL BB SF
'. � MECHANICALWELL NOP4PU&JCACCESS ROOFTOPIEVEL NO NO MECHANCAL 868SF
�� ,�; MEGHANICAL 956 SF
" _' _—
. . . HOOTERS COVEREDBAR� ROOFTOPLEVEL NO YES RESiAURANT 979SF
. . �:- �:� ,,, , ..:;. . � i SEATNG . .
�' HOOTERS IOBBV fl00FTOPLEVEL YES YES RESTAUfUN� 2COSF
OPEN Il� HOOTERS UNISEXTpLETROOM ROOFTOPLEVEL YES VES RESTAURANT B1SF
ZZSF �� � ^ �y HOOTERS 'ORVSTOfiAGE ROOFTOPLEVEL YE$ NO RESTAURPNT 3205F
� ��� � ' ` � � � � ���� p OPEN HOOTERS � BEERCOOLER ROOfTOPLEVEL YES NO RESTAURANT 248SF
;I HOOTERS OPENSEAI7NG �� ROOFTOPLEVEL NO VES RESTAURANT 1772SF
� ___--_ _____..__ "—_ .__
- RESTAURANT 3600 SF
i„
Grantl�olal t3404 SF
'����'������� FAR AREA SCHEDULE PARpNG AREA SCHEDULE
' ' ' I LEVEL AREA LEVEL AREA
. 1 ST FLOOR 3920$F 1 ST FLOOR 42%SF
_ . 2ND FLOOR 3167 SF 2ND FLOOR� 4517 SF
ROOfTOP IEVEL B89 SF ROOFfOP LEVEL 3072 SF
,� QPEN Grantl�o�al 7973 SF GranO�o�el 11880 SF
50 SF �
.� • � � �j= �$N
T
' NOTE:SQUARE FOOTAGE CALCULATIONS ARE TO THE EXTERIOR � �-� C��
��E� � �� FACE OF EXTERIOR WALLS AND TO CENTER OF TENANT �� y o�
52 SF SEPARATION W ALLS �� ��O1
106SF � TT �W 3�`�
. _._ - �.^.�V �
ao�
--T"_� '���--. m z n
M��a��. � = $o�^,
� �
� i
x �
�� . � ���� � rrn .,:� � �� l I� �� � s a
q <
TI d � TERS � � HOO�ERS
i� ' HOOTEfiS �-�750 SF --
240 SF T " '�'� "'..� - 956 SF
.. .: ,.,,, . . �
�'� ._. 8t SF 320 SF .. `> , Z
i j
H
� � � Q
h100TERS ECfWNiCAk.WE�I_; � ` �
979 SF &i8 SF � <� Z LL
OOTERS O
x
H TER 2058 SF � V ui U
248 SP ' �� � � -c �
' �
�;��� �^ S Y ;m
�
��,� << _ _ � g � �
�,"� � � -�� ,� � � m o <
� Z
t ;
O �,��`�- ,, L�'., �'r , � Y Q¢ a
�''�+- d�����i� a
��' ' � �?, w �Y �w w
¢ ¢
' ,� a � �o ¢
�
- � i �
�� „ _ - J SHEETNUMBER
� �� i . �'� � :
� I`
' .. �... .._ J ...__ '�� I I J
� PRE-1
�
-- .._ %100TERS �� HOOTERS Q
- .,,�� +772 SF j �? � �
€ 50$ z
L �
; �I I _ Nj SEAL
� ��I --� .�� I ._ .. .. ___. ..� 2
I �
� .I r ,- �' PRELIMINARY-
i 3 NOT FOR
j �' CONSTRUCTION
S �