Loading...
05/31/2011 COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING MINUTES CITY OF CLEARWATER May Present: Chair/Trustee Frank Hibbard, Trustee George N. Cretekos, Trustee John Doran, Trustee Paul Gibson, and Trustee Bill Jonson. Also Present: Jill S. Silverboard - Assistant City Manager, Rod Irwin -Assistant City Manager, Pamela K. Akin - City Attorney, Rosemarie Call - City Clerk, and Nicole Sprague — Official Records and Legislative Services Coordinator. To provide continuity for research, items are in agenda order although not necessarily discussed in that order. 1. Call to Order— Chair/Trustee Frank Hibbard The meeting was called to order at 9:04 a.m. at City Hall. 2. Approval of Minutes 2.1 Approve the minutes of the May 16, 2011 CRA Meeting as submitted in written summation by the City Clerk. Trustee Bill Jonson moved to approve the minutes of the May 16, 2011 CRA Meeting as submitted in written summation by the City Clerk. The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously. 3. CRA Items 3.1 Authorize the Clearwater Community Redevelopment Agency (CRA) to accept funds from the proceeds of the sale from the City of Clearwater's Voluntary Clean-up Tax Credits according to the agreement with Clocktower Tax Credits, LLC. A tax credit is an economic incentive issued by a government agency to encourage private activity, typically investments, in economic development. The Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) issued these awards to the City of Clearwater based on approved FDEP costs incurred for environmental Community Redevelopment Agency 2011-05-31 1 remediation work at the Clearwater Automotive property, located at 205 S. Martin Luther King Avenue. The Voluntary Cleanup Tax Credits (VCTC) are in the form of four certificates received in fiscal years 2007, 2008, 2009 and 2011 for a cumulative total of$516,944.18. The original intent for the use of the VCTC was as an incentive for the redevelopment of the property. An interlocal agreement was executed on July 1, 2006 between the Clearwater Community Redevelopment Agency (CRA) and the City of Clearwater. The purpose and intent of this Agreement is to provide a means by which the CRA and the City would exercise their respective powers and services in a manner that will best accord with the existing and anticipated resources available to meet specific expenses incurred for the environmental cleanup of the Clearwater Automotive Salvage Yard (project site). The CRA is the owner of the project site and incurred the expenses related to the tax credits issued. The CRA borrowed funds from the City's Brownfields Cleanup Revolving Loan Fund for this purpose. The City was the entity that entered into the contracts for the remediation of the site. The VCTC have a one-time, transferable limitation and can be sold or allocated to outside investors subject to the conditions in Florida Statutes Section 220.1845. The City has a five-year time frame, from the issue date on the original certificate, to transfer the VCTC certificates to an entity that has a Florida corporate income tax liability. When a transfer occurs, the five-year clock restarts, the transferee will receive a certificate with a new issue date (date of transfer) and the transferee will have five years from that date to use the certificate. The certificate is not eligible to be sold once a new certificate is issued. As the original certificate deadline is nearing expiration, staff is recommending the sale of the four certificates together anticipating a higher rate of return. In addition, as the sale of tax credits is a specialized service, staff discussed with the FDEP the City's options. The FDEP provided a list of qualified vendors experienced with Florida's program. Because it is impractical to bid, the City received two bids from firms that are experienced with Florida's program. On May 5, 2011, the City Council approved the sale of the tax credit certificates and a contract with Clocktower Tax Credits, LLC to manage the sale and transfer of the ownership of the VCTC given their experience and pricing structure. FDEP verified that in fiscal year 2010, Jeff Jacobson, President of Clocktower Tax Credits, Inc. successfully processed fourteen of the eighteen transactions they received. The cities of Orlando, St. Petersburg, Gainesville and the Jackson Electric Authority verified excellent service regarding the sale of VCTC with Jeff Jacobson. Clocktower's (Agency) services will include, but are not limited to: securing its client to purchase the VCTC, drafting all legal documents (purchase agreement between the City of Clearwater and purchaser and referral agreement between the City of Clearwater and Agency), file the required transfer documents and forms with the State of Florida, and manage the transfer of funds from the purchaser to the City. Community Redevelopment Agency 2011-05-31 2 Tax credit pricing is determined by the marketplace. Transferable tax credits are priced with a cents-per-dollar of credit purchase price. The current pricing being paid is $0.85 per dollar of each credit (takes into account the time value of money). The sale of the City's certificates will yield $439,402.55 at this price. Clocktower Tax Credits, LLC will refer its qualified Florida taxpayers to the City for an agency referral fee capped at $0.05 for each dollar of credit purchased by its client, or $25,847.21. The City would receive $0.80 per dollar of each credit estimated at $413,555.34. If VCTC certificates are sold above $0.85 per dollar, the Agency will pay the City the additional proceeds. The funds received from the sale of the certificates will be transferred to the CRA and deposited into the Downtown Redevelopment line item (94714). Trustee John Doran moved to authorize the Clearwater Community Redevelopment Agency (CRA) to accept funds from the proceeds of the sale from the City of Clearwater's Voluntary Clean-up Tax Credits according to the agreement with Clocktower Tax Credits, LLC. The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously. 3.2 Accept selection committee recommendation and approve a Professional Services Contract between the Clearwater Community Redevelopment Agency and M. Arthur Gensler, Jr. and Associates, Inc. (Gensler), for the development of an East Gateway District Vision Plan according to RFP 15-11 in an amount not to exceed $68,000 and authorize the appropriate officials to execute same. In June 2009, the East Gateway Stakeholder Advisory Group, the steering committee for the East Gateway Five-Year Action Program, suggested that the City/CRA engage the community in redefining a vision for future development and community character of the East Gateway District. In January 2010, the Community Redevelopment Agency (CRA) staff put the issue before the CRA Board as a multi-phase project to include vision development as phase one and implementation based on vision plan outcomes as an optional subsequent phase. The CRA Board agreed to proceed. On March 8, 2011, the CRA sought proposals from qualified firms to develop a comprehensive and collaborative neighborhood vision plan that will address three main areas: 1) a Neighborhood Market/Economic Analysis that defines the economic base for market-supportable revitalization efforts; 2) Community Outreach and Stakeholder Involvement culminating in a Community Design Charrette that provides a strong, clear vision of the area and responds to current and future market opportunities; and 3) a Concept Plan and Policy Framework Community Redevelopment Agency 2011-05-31 3 that identify specific implementation actions and tools needed to achieve the vision over a 20-year horizon. On April 8, 2011, the CRA received eighteen (18) proposals from consulting firms. The five-member Evaluation/Selection Committee was comprised of the following individuals: Geraldine Campos Lopez, Director of Economic Development and Housing Department Gina Clayton, Assistant Director of Planning and Development Department Felicia Leonard, Administrative Support Manager of Parks and Rec. and member of the East Gateway Task Force Duggan Cooley, President/CEO of RCS and member of the East Gateway Stakeholder Advisory Group Ekaterini Gerakios, Community Development Coordinator The Evaluation/Selection Committee met on April 15, 2011 to review and rank the proposals. Proposals were evaluated and ranked based on each firm's qualifications and experience, project understanding and approach to the advertised Scope of Work, and quality of previous performance. The Committee invited the following five (5) firms for an oral presentation: AECOM (Orlando, FL) Gensler (Tampa, FL) HDR Engineering, Inc. (Tampa, FL) IBI Group, Inc. (Tampa, FL) Wade Trim, Inc. (Tampa, FL) The first two (2) oral presentations took place on April 25, 2011. The last three (3) oral presentations took place on April 28, 2011. On May 3, 2011, after the completion of all five oral presentations and checking of references, the Evaluation/Selection Committee chose Gensler as the top-ranked firm. Staff is recommending Gensler for the following reasons: Community Redevelopment Agency 2011-05-31 4 Comprehensive approach to the Scope of Work with clear objectives, strategies, and tactics Partnership with Social Compact Inc., a nonprofit in operation for 20 years, experienced in performing market analyses in underserved, lower-income neighborhoods Unique approach to the market/economic analysis with a proven methodology called Progressive Analytics for Development (PAD) Extensive experience with relevant projects including analysis, design, planning and facilitation skills Experience with branding strategies to reposition the East Gateway District for market development Excellent references from City of Tampa, FL, City of Houston, TX, Central Houston Inc., Detroit Economic Growth Corporation, and Washington, DC Economic Partnership Bilingual staff to be provided as necessary throughout the duration of the visioning process The East Gateway District Vision Plan is expected to: Deliver a workable strategy with supporting rationale Ensure that new development can be economically viable Build on previous and current plans, initiatives, and projects Maximize ultimate return on public investment Address community interests and concerns Provide recommendations aimed to enhance the quality of life and standard of living The contract is for a not to exceed amount of$68,000 ($60,000 for labor and $8,000 in direct reimbursable expenses). Funding is available in the CRA's East Gateway line item (94849) for this contract. Community Redevelopment Agency 2011-05-31 5 In response to questions, Economic Development and Housing Director Geri Campos Lopez said the proposed study is meant to look past the 5-year East Gateway neighborhood stabilization strategy. CRA Executive Director Rod Irwin said the market analysis will identify how much retail, commercial and residential the neighborhood can support in the mid- and long-term. Discussion ensued with concerns expressed regarding pursuing with the study. Mr. Irwin said that although over $200,000 has been spent in recent years for different economic studies, downtown and citywide, this study includes a design charrette and architectural analysis. The community stakeholders requested staff to conduct the study. It was suggested that staff provide a status report on all studies for downtown over the past five years. In response to questions, Planning and Development Director Michael Delk said the economic analysis would provide staff with information regarding the East Gateway's market potential. He commented that it would be worthwhile to revisit the downtown plan as time has elapsed since it was created and that the community's needs may have changed. Incorporating all of downtown to the East Gateway area will expand the scope of the district, which is critical in the long-term. Trustee George N. Cretekos moved to accept selection committee recommendation and approve a Professional Services Contract between the Clearwater Community Redevelopment Agency and M. Arthur Gensler, Jr. and Associates, Inc. (Gensler), for the development of an East Gateway District Vision Plan according to RFP 15-11 in an amount not to exceed $68,000 and authorize the appropriate officials to execute same. The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously. 4. Other Business — None. 5. Adiourn The meeting was adjourned at 9:50 a.m. i �Q` AT s ,,,C air Attest 'mow own '\. community Redevelopment Agency * rcqt .,fr,(2,4ux, City Clerk �<<�fN11111111►NII� Community Redevelopment Agency 2011-05-31 6